Popular Inc Annual Report 2010

Plain-text annual report

A n n u a l R e p o r t 2010 I n f o r m e A n u a l A n n u a l R e p o r t 20 10 I n f o r m e A n u a l 1 2 5 6 8 Letter to Shareholders 11 Carta a los Accionistas Institutional Values 12 Valores Institucionales Highlights, Key Facts & Figures 15 Puntos Principales, Cifras y Datos Claves A Legacy of Caring 16 Un Legado de Compromiso 25-Year Historical Financial Summary 18 Resumen Financiero Histórico – 25 Años 10 Corporate Information 20 Información Corporativa 21 Financial Review and Supplementary Information Popular, Inc. (NASDAQ:BPOP) is a full service Popular, Inc. (NASDAQ: BPOP) es un proveedor ﬁnancial provider based in Puerto Rico with ﬁnanciero de servicio completo con base en Puerto operations in Puerto Rico and the United States. In Rico y operaciones en Puerto Rico y los Estados Puerto Rico it is the leading banking institution by Unidos. En Puerto Rico es la institución bancaria both assets and deposits, and ranks 35th in assets líder tanto en activos como en depósitos, y está among U.S. banks. With 185 branches in Puerto clasiﬁcada como la 35ta en activos entre los bancos Rico, Popular offers retail and commercial banking estadounidenses. Con 185 sucursales en Puerto Rico, services, as well as auto and equipment leasing and ofrece servicios bancarios a individuos y comerciales, ﬁnancing, mortgage loans, investment banking and así como arrendamiento y ﬁnanciamiento de broker-dealer services. In the United States, Popular autos y equipo, préstamos hipotecarios, banca de has established a community-banking franchise inversión y transacciones de corredores de valores. providing a broad range of ﬁnancial services and En los Estados Unidos, Popular ha establecido products with branches in New York, New Jersey, una franquicia bancaria de base comunitaria que Illinois, Florida and California. provee una amplia gama de servicios y productos ﬁnancieros, con sucursales en Nueva York, Nueva Jersey, Illinois, Florida y California. P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T 1 l et ter to S H A R E H O L D E R S DEAR SHAREHOLDERS: SALE OF EVERTEC I am pleased to report that Popular rose above signiﬁcant challenges and ended 2010 in a considerably stronger position than the year before. We built up our capital base, further solidiﬁed our leadership position in Puerto Rico, and continued making progress in the restructuring of our operations in the United States. 2 0 1 0 K E Y E V E N T S CAPITAL In the context of a potential FDIC driven consolidation process in Puerto Rico, we successfully completed a public offering in April, raising a total of $1.15 billion at a price equivalent to $3 per common share. This capital raise, along with the gain generated by the sale of a majority stake in EVERTEC, substantially strengthened all of our capital ratios. These transactions placed us in a position to participate in the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking market and allowed us to pursue strategies to improve the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio, such as the reclassiﬁcation and sale of high-risk portfolios. ACQUISITION OF WESTERNBANK The closing by the Ofﬁce of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions, together with the FDIC, of three banks in Puerto Rico, which at the time accounted for 20% of assets in the market, signiﬁcantly altered the local banking landscape. In what turned out to be the largest FDIC assisted transaction in 2010, Popular acquired approximately $9 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.4 billion in deposits. This transaction provided Banco Popular Puerto Rico with a substantial amount of incremental assets with a low level of credit risk since the FDIC reimburses Popular for 80% of the losses incurred on acquired loans. In addition, it further enhanced our leadership position on the island, which as of September 2010, boasted a deposit market share, excluding brokered deposits, of 42% and loan market share of 32%. As part of our capital plan, early in the year we launched a process to sell all or a majority interest in EVERTEC. In June, we signed an agreement to sell a 51% interest to Apollo Management. The transaction, which closed in September and valued EVERTEC at approximately $870 million, generated a net gain of $531 million. This was a difﬁcult decision, as this company, this group of colleagues, had grown from within our organization. But the sale was necessary to accomplish other important objectives. WE ARE PROUD OF EVERTEC AND ITS EVOLUTION, AND WE ARE EXTREMELY SATISFIED WITH THE TRANSACTION, WHICH ALLOWED US TO RETAIN SIGNIFICANT OWNERSHIP. As both, Apollo’s partner and EVERTEC’s largest client, we look forward to participating in the new venture’s growth and success. RECLASSIFICATION OF LOAN PORTFOLIOS FOR FUTURE SALE With the objective of reducing credit risk in our balance sheet, in December of 2010 we reclassiﬁed approximately $1 billion of loans as held-for-sale with the intent of selling them in the coming months. In Puerto Rico, the reclassiﬁcation involved approximately $603 million of construction and commercial real estate loans. In January of 2011, we signed a non-binding letter of intent to sell the majority of the reclassiﬁed loans. In the United States, we reclassiﬁed approximately $396 million of U.S. non-conforming residential mortgages and are actively pursuing several potential sale alternatives. While the reclassiﬁcation of these portfolios involved marking these loans to market, with a combined incremental provision expense of $176 million, the sale of these assets will substantially reduce non-performing assets in our books and will allow us to refocus the organization and redeploy resources to generate new business. 2 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T l et ter to S H A R E H O L D E R S F I N A N C I A L R E S U LT S A N D S TO C K P E R F O R M A N C E POPULAR ACHIEVED A NET INCOME OF $137.4 MILLION IN 2010 COMPARED TO A NET LOSS OF $573.9 MILLION IN 2009. The result for 2010 includes $531 million from the gain on the sale of a majority interest in EVERTEC, as well as additional income from the Westernbank operations acquired in April 2010, partially offset by $176 million in charges related to the reclassiﬁcation of several portfolios to loans held-for-sale, among other items. While credit remained the critical issue in 2010, for the ﬁrst time in ﬁve years, we saw signs of stabilization. The provision for loan losses in 2010 totaled $1.0 billion, compared to $1.4 billion in 2009. Excluding the impact of the expense related to the reclassiﬁcation of various portfolios to held-for-sale, the provision was 41% lower than 2009. Our stock price closed 2010 at $3.14. While it does not change the fact that our stock lost 85% of its value in the last ﬁve years, 2010 was the ﬁrst year since 2004 that the stock had a year-to-year positive performance. With a 39% gain, BPOP outperformed the S&P 500 and Keefe Bank Indices, as well as our peer institutions in the U.S. and all banks in Puerto Rico. B A N C O P O P U L A R P U E R TO R I C O DURING 2010, BANCO POPULAR PUERTO RICO (BPPR) FOCUSED MOST OF ITS EFFORTS ON INTEGRATING WESTERNBANK’S OPERATIONS AND MANAGING CREDIT QUALITY. During 2010, BPPR acquired approximately $9 billion in loans and assumed approximately $2.4 billion in deposits. An acquisition of this magnitude normally requires signiﬁcant attention, but the limited time frame and the complexities related to an FDIC assisted transaction, demanded even more resources in order to guarantee a smooth transition. I am pleased to report that we completed the system and branch conversion in just four months after the acquisition, leveraging our infrastructure to generate signiﬁcant synergies. WE ADDED TWELVE BRANCHES TO OUR NETWORK AND RETAINED APPROXIMATELY 57% OF WESTERNBANK’S EMPLOYEES. OUR HEADCOUNT IN BPPR IS PRACTICALLY AT THE SAME LEVEL IT WAS IN 2007, WHILE ASSETS HAVE INCREASED BY 8% IN THE SAME PERIOD. The Westernbank acquisition also offers many opportunities to grow our business moving forward. Westernbank had approximately 240,000 clients, 140,000 of which did not have a relationship with Popular at the time of the transaction. Furthermore, the majority only had one banking relationship with Westernbank, which translates into great cross-selling possibilities for us. As of year-end, we had retained more than 90% of the incoming clients, and we are offering the entire array of Popular’s products, services and channels to expand our relationship with them. The protracted recession in the Puerto Rican economy continued to have a negative impact on BPPR’s credit quality during 2010. Net charge-offs totaled $680 million, an increase of 33% when compared to the previous year, including $153 million related to the decision to promptly charge-off the previously reserved impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans. Higher net charge-offs in the construction, commercial and mortgage portfolios were partially offset by an improvement in the consumer portfolio. Non-performing loans held for investment reached $1.1 billion at the end of 2010, 25% lower than 2009. This decrease was mainly due to the previously discussed reclassiﬁcation of approximately $603 million of loans as held for sale, most of them in non- accruing status, as well as the charge-off of impaired collateral dependent loans mentioned above. The groups in charge of managing credit quality have worked diligently to minimize losses. The commercial credit unit aimed for the early detection of problem loans and the timely transfer to a specialized group that develops Institutional VA L U E S SOCIAL COMMITMENT We work hand-in-hand with our communities. We are committed to actively promote the social and economic well-being of our communities. CUSTOMER We develop life-long relationships. Our relationship with the customer takes precedence over any particular transaction. We add value to each interaction by offering high quality personalized service, and efﬁcient and innovative solutions. INTEGRITY We live up to the trust placed in us. We adhere to the strictest ethical and moral standards through our daily decisions and actions. 3 BPPR’S FUNDAMENTALS REMAIN AS STRONG AS EVER, IF NOT MORE SO. AS THE LEADING BANKING FRANCHISE IN PUERTO RICO, WE ARE WELL-POSITIONED TO BENEFIT FROM THE EVENTUAL STABILIZATION OF THE ECONOMY. WE INTEND TO CAPITALIZE ON THESE STRENGTHS TO INCREASE OUR SHARE OF THE MARKET THROUGH A RENEWED FOCUS ON CUSTOMER SERVICE AND EFFICIENCY. individual action plans for each loan it receives. The construction loan team continued working on accelerating absorption rates through aggressive marketing and sales initiatives and joined forces with Popular Mortgage to take advantage of the housing incentives introduced by the Puerto Rican government in the latter part of the year. The consumer loss mitigation group implemented a more customer-oriented strategy, improving its facilities and creating a dedicated call center. BPPR registered a net income of $47 million in 2010, compared to net income of $158 million in 2009. This reduction is mostly due to a persistently high provision for loan losses, as well as a gain of $228 million in the sale of securities registered in 2009. However, we are conﬁdent that the future sale of the reclassiﬁed portfolio, as well as the efforts to manage the quality of the loans on our books, will result in a better credit performance in 2011, lessening its pressure on our results. BPPR’s fundamentals remain as strong as ever, if not more so. As the leading banking franchise in Puerto Rico, we are well-positioned to beneﬁt from the eventual stabilization of the economy. We intend to capitalize on these strengths to increase our share of the market through a renewed focus on customer service and efﬁciency. B A N C O P O P U L A R N O R T H A M E R I C A BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA (BPNA) CLOSED 2010 WITH A NET LOSS OF $340 MILLION. THOUGH STILL FAR FROM WHERE WE NEED BPNA TO BE, THIS WAS A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT OVER THE $726 MILLION NET LOSS REGISTERED IN 2009. The reduction in the loss was driven by a lower provision for loan losses due to a general improvement in credit quality, partially offset by the impact of several transactions completed at year-end. First, in order to pursue the sale of the riskier portion of our non-conforming residential mortgage portfolio, we reclassiﬁed approximately $396 million in loans to held-for-sale, which resulted in an additional provision expense of $120 million. In addition, we terminated approximately $417 million in high-cost borrowings, incurring approximately $22 million in prepayment penalties. Even though these transactions had a signiﬁcant impact in 2010, BPNA should beneﬁt in the future from lower funding costs and an improvement in credit quality. BPNA CONTINUED THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN ANNOUNCED IN LATE 2008 THAT SEEKS TO FOCUS EFFORTS AND RESOURCES ON THE CORE COMMUNITY BANKING BUSINESS. As part of the branch network optimization effort, we completed ﬁve additional branch consolidations in 2010, bringing the total number of branches from 147 in 2007 to 96 by the end of 2010. To expand our customers’ free access to ATMs, we signed an agreement with Allpoint, a surcharge-free network, which has more than 40,000 ATMs nationwide. We also upgraded our Internet banking service, presenting a more user-friendly layout, improving navigation and adding capabilities such as the ability to open transactional accounts and CDs online. Just seven months after its launch, the number of active users of our Internet platform increased by 19%. We continued expanding our product offering with the introduction of two segment-oriented credit cards, leveraging Banco Popular Puerto Rico’s extensive expertise in this area. On the commercial and construction loan side, 2010 signaled the reversal of the severe deterioration in credit quality that started in 2006. Non-performing held-for-investment loans in these categories declined by 28% during the year and net charge-offs would have been in line with those in 2009 if not for the decision to accelerate the charge-off of previously reserved impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans. Similar to the rest of the industry, organic loan growth has been challenging due to reduced demand. As a result of last year’s reduction, BPNA’s commercial and construction loan portfolio declined by 19%, although 60% of the reduction came from those business segments we discontinued as part of the restructuring plan. EXCELLENCE INNOVATION OUR PEOPLE PERFORMANCE We strive to excel each day. We believe there is only one way to do things: doing them right from the ﬁrst time while exceeding expectations. We are a driving force for progress. We foster a constant search for innovative ideas and solutions in everything we do, thus enhancing our competitive advantage. We have the best talent. We are leaders and work together as a team in a caring and disciplined environment. We are fully committed to our shareholders. We aim to attain a high level of efﬁciency, both individually and as a team, to achieve superior and consistent ﬁnancial results based on a long-term vision. 4 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T l et t er to S H A R E H O L D E R S One of the most signiﬁcant events of the year was the rebranding of the Banco Popular North America franchise in the Illinois region. The strategy and the new name, Popular Community Bank, seeks to present non-Hispanic customers with a more inclusive and welcoming proposition while maintaining the strong legacy that Popular has within the Hispanic market. Launched in August, the rebranding pilot was supported by branch improvements, a new corporate attire for our employees and an advertising campaign. Initial results have been encouraging, reﬂecting an increase in business from non-Hispanic customers. We will continue monitoring results to decide on a potential rollout to other regions. Convinced that our efforts in the U.S. would beneﬁt greatly from a stronger and more uniﬁed management team, in September we named Carlos J. Vázquez President of Banco Popular North America. Carlos, who at the time was the head of the Consumer Lending Group in Puerto Rico, had also been leading the Retail Banking Operations at BPNA. As expected, Carlos hit the ground running, leading the efforts mentioned above and providing the BPNA team with the energy and direction necessary to continue the successful implementation of our restructuring plan to return BPNA to proﬁtable levels as soon as possible. O U R O R G A N I Z A T I O N In 2010, Ignacio Álvarez joined Popular as Chief Legal Ofﬁcer. Bringing with him extensive experience in banking, corporate ﬁnance and securities law, Ignacio has been a great addition to our senior management team. In May, David H. Chafey, Jr. concluded his career at Popular. We thank him his many years of service to our organization. THE ACHIEVEMENTS I HAVE SHARED WITH YOU ARE THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE WORK OF 8,277 DEDICATED EMPLOYEES WHO THROUGHOUT THE YEAR WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ORGANIZATION. I also want to express my gratitude to our Board of Directors for its invaluable contribution. There is much talk about corporate governance, and standards and rules abound. But for me, the true test of sound corporate governance is when, in difﬁcult times, a Board strikes the right balance between guidance and support. Popular is blessed to have a Board that has continuously struck this balance throughout these critical years. A very special member of our Board, Frederic V. Salerno, will not run for reelection in 2011 in order to devote more time to other professional responsibilities. Fred has been an integral part of our Board since he became a member in 2003, performing important roles such as Lead Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee with great skill, remarkable dedication and unquestionable integrity. Even though his experience, guidance and camaraderie will be missed by other Board members and management, Fred will always remain a close friend of Popular. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board commenced the process of identifying a new nominee, while William J. Teuber, who has been a Board member since 2004, will assume the role of Lead Director. There are still challenges ahead, including limited economic growth in our principal markets, the impact of new banking regulations and increased competition as the Puerto Rico banking market recovers from last year events. However, we are conﬁdent that, given the steps taken in 2010 and our strategies for 2011, Popular is well-positioned to reach operational proﬁtability in 2011. With continued optimism and renewed strength, we will work relentlessly to achieve it. Sincerely, RICHARD L. CARRIÓN CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2010 highlights K E Y FAC T S & F I G U R E S 5 P O P U L A R , I N C . 35th largest bank holding company in the U.S.1 with $38.7 billion in assets2 and 8,277 employees2 2010 HIGHLIGHTS (cid:154) Raised $1.6 billion in capital through the secondary offering of 383 million additional shares of common stock in April, and the majority sale of the technology processor EVERTEC to Apollo Management, L.P., giving the Corporation a robust capital base to meet Basel 3 requirements. (cid:154) Completed the FDIC assisted acquisition of Westernbank Puerto Rico, adding $5 billion in earning assets and close to 140,000 clients who previously did not have a relationship with Popular. (cid:154) Reclassiﬁed approximately $1 billion of loans held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale, reducing non- performing held-in-portfolio loans by approximately $608 million. B A N C O P O P U L A R P U E R TO R I C O KEY FACTS (cid:154) More than 1.5 million clients (cid:154)(cid:1)193 branches and 54 ofﬁces throughout Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands (cid:154)(cid:1)6,531 FTEs2 (cid:154)(cid:1)641 ATMs throughout Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands (cid:154) #1 market share in Total Deposits (42%)1 and Total Loans (32%)1 (cid:154)(cid:1)$29.3 billion in assets, $19.5 billion in loans and $20.2 billion in deposits2 B A N C O P O P U L A R N O R T H A M E R I C A KEY FACTS (cid:154)(cid:1)Approximately 415,000 clients (cid:154)(cid:1)96 branches throughout ﬁve states (Florida, California, New York, New Jersey, and Illinois) (cid:154)(cid:1)1,393 FTEs2 (cid:154)(cid:1)Access to more than 40,000 ATMs nationwide through Allpoint network (cid:154)(cid:1)E-LOAN held $580 million in deposits2 and approximately 28,600 clients (cid:154)(cid:1)$9.0 billion in assets, $6.9 billion in loans and $6.6 billion in total deposits2 1 As of 9/30/2010 2 As of 12/31/2010 6 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T a l egacy O F C A R I N G SINCE ITS FOUNDATION 117 YEARS AGO, POPULAR HAS DEMONSTRATED A SOLID COMMITMENT TO THE COMMUNITIES IT SERVES. FIRMLY GUIDED BY OUR VALUES, WE CONTRIBUTE IN NUMEROUS WAYS TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE. IN 2010, POPULAR EXPANDED ITS OUTREACH FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS AND ALLIANCES WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. D O N A T I O N S A R T S A N D M U S I C Fundación Banco Popular supports non-proﬁt organizations focused on improving the quality of education that students receive and on the social and economic development of our communities. In 2010, the Fundación invested $1,444,883 in support of 73 organizations in Puerto Rico. In the U.S., Banco Popular Foundation invested $116,350 in support of 27 non-proﬁt organizations. Fundación Banco Popular promotes arts and music as an integral part of student education. Since 2008, Fundación joins the local ﬁrm Méndez & Co. in the Berklee in Puerto Rico program conducted by faculty members of the renowned Berklee College of Music. In 2010, more than 150 students received music classes during the week-long workshop. E D U C A T I O N In an effort to multiply our individual impact on education non-proﬁts, the Fundación joined three other local foundations and Hispanics in Philanthropy to create the Puerto Rico Donor’s Education Collaborative (PRDEC). The PRDEC is the ﬁrst collaborative fund created in Puerto Rico to maximize available resources and donations for non-proﬁt organizations working in the education area. In 2010, the PRDEC awarded $320,000 to seven local organizations. For the ﬁfth consecutive year, the Fundación Banco Popular and the Luis A. Ferré Foundation sponsored the Revive la Música project, which promotes music education for children and youngsters. This program serves as a platform to develop music talent through the donation of instruments, community concerts, workshops and concerts with well-known Puerto Rican musicians for the beneﬁt of the participants and the general public. E M P L O Y E E C O M M I T M E N T In 2010, the Fundación contributed $321,200 in scholarships to 122 students through the Rafael Carrión Jr. Scholarship Fund, a scholarship program for children of Popular employees. Other educational programs include endowed scholarships for Puerto Rican students in seven colleges and universities and the Rafael Carrión Jr. Academic Excellence Award that granted $56,250 to 75 high school seniors. Employee involvement goes well beyond monetary contributions. In the U.S., over 650 BPNA employees volunteered 2,800 hours of community service during 2010’s Make a Difference Day beneﬁting 32 non-proﬁt organizations. In Puerto Rico, the Mi Escuela en Tus Manos project alone counted with the support of 1,600 Popular employees who helped paint and refurbish 70 public schools that serve over 18,000 students. The generosity of Popular employees is also manifested each year through voluntary contributions to the Fundación. In 2010, 75% of the employees showed their generous commitment to the community by donating $545,198 to the Fundación through payroll deduction. FUNDACIÓN BANCO POPULAR (P.R.) GRANTS AWARDED (1990-2010) BANCO POPULAR FOUNDATION (U.S.) GRANTS AWARDED (2010) Dollars in thousands GRANTS ORGANIZATIONS Dollars in thousands GRANTS ORGANIZATIONS $2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 80 40 0 $50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 California Central Florida South Florida Illinois New York Metro 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 7 we value our social commitmen t We work hand-in-hand with our communities. YMCA of San Juan Nuestra Escuela A H A N D T O H A I T I In 2010 Popular responded assertively to support our neighbors in Haiti affected by the earthquake. Fundación Banco Popular established a collection center where food and clothing items donated at the Bank’s branches were classiﬁed and sorted in 1,260 boxes, and sent to that country. Close to 300 volunteer employees participated in this effort. The Fundación opened an account to receive donations from the Puerto Rican public to help a local health organization’s efforts in Haiti. Over $320,000 were collected to aid medical volunteer efforts and the establishment of a health clinic outside of Port-Au-Prince. The Fundación also contributed to a conference-workshop for professionals about suggestions for the reconstruction of the country’s capital. A second account was opened by the Bank to beneﬁt the American Red Cross Puerto Rico for its efforts in Haiti. Collections for this account totaled $920,000. Banco Popular made a direct donation to this fund to make it reach $1 million. Teach Children to Save R E A C H I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E Banco Popular believes that people well-informed about ﬁnancial matters can contribute greatly to their personal well-being and to the well-being of their community and country. Thus, our Financial Education Program continued during 2010. A total of 107 workshops were held throughout Puerto Rico, with the participation of 4,107 adults. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR) was recognized by the American Banker’s Association for its efforts in carrying out the Teach Children to Save project. Banco Popular reached 109,554 elementary school students, more than any other bank in the nation. BPNA employees personally gave the savings education lessons, providing students with the tools to make smarter, more informed personal ﬁnance decisions. Popular’s commitment to SERVICE translates into numerous forms of expression. Whether as a provider of ﬁnancial services or as an instigator for progress in our communities, we continue to be guided by our unwavering dedication to serve. Mi Escuela en Tus Manos Revive La Música 8 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T Pop u lar, Inc. 25 y ear H I S T O R I C A L F I N A N C I A L SU M M A R Y (Dollars in millions, except per share data) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Selected Financial Information Net Income (Loss) Assets Net Loans Deposits Stockholders’ Equity Market Capitalization Return on Assets (ROA) Return on Equity (ROE) Per Common Share1 Net Income (Loss) – Basic Net Income (Loss) – Diluted Dividends (Declared) Book Value Market Price Assets by Geographical Area Puerto Rico United States Caribbean and Latin America Total Traditional Delivery System Banking Branches Puerto Rico Virgin Islands United States Subtotal Non-Banking Offices Popular Financial Holdings Popular Cash Express Popular Finance Popular Auto Popular Leasing, U.S.A. Popular Mortgage Popular Securities Popular Insurance Popular Insurance Agency U.S.A. Popular Insurance, V.I. E-LOAN EVERTEC Subtotal Total Electronic Delivery System ATMs Owned Puerto Rico Virgin Islands United States Total $ 38.3 4,531.8 2,271.0 3,820.2 283.1 $ 38.3 5,389.6 2,768.5 4,491.6 308.2 $ 47.4 5,706.5 3,096.3 4,715.8 341.9 $ 56.3 5,972.7 3,320.6 4,926.3 383.0 $ 63.4 8,983.6 $ 64.6 8,780.3 5,373.3 7,422.7 588.9 5,195.6 7,207.1 631.8 $ 85.1 10,002.3 5,252.1 8,038.7 $ 109.4 11,513.4 6,346.9 8,522.7 $ 124.7 12,778.4 7,781.3 $ 146.4 15,675.5 8,677.5 9,012.4 9,876.7 752.1 834.2 1,002.4 1,141.7 $ 185.2 16,764.1 9,779.0 10,763.3 1,262.5 $ 304.0 $ 260.0 $ 355.0 $ 430.1 $ 479.1 $ 579.0 $ 987.8 $ 1,014.7 $ 923.7 $ 1,276.8 $ 2,230.5 0.88% 15.12% 0.76% 13.09% 0.85% 14.87% 0.99% 15.87% 1.09% 15.55% 0.72% 10.57% 0.89% 12.72% 1.02% 13.80% 1.02% 13.80% 1.04% 14.22% 1.14% 16.17% $ $ $ $ 0.25 0.25 0.08 1.73 $ 2.00 $ 0.24 0.24 0.09 1.89 1.67 $ $ $ 0.30 0.30 0.09 2.10 2.22 $ $ $ $ 0.35 0.35 0.10 2.35 $ 2.69 $ 92% 7% 1% 100% 124 3 9 136 136 113 113 94% 5% 1% 100% 126 3 9 138 93% 6% 1% 100% 126 3 10 139 14 17 14 152 136 3 139 17 156 153 3 156 14.9 159.8 5,131 92% 6% 2% 100% 128 3 10 141 18 4 22 163 151 3 154 16.1 161.9 5,213 0.40 0.40 0.10 2.46 2.00 89% 9% 2% 100% 173 3 24 200 26 9 35 235 211 3 214 18.0 164.0 7,023 $ $ $ 0.27 0.27 0.10 2.63 2.41 $ $ $ 0.35 0.35 0.10 2.88 3.78 $ $ $ 0.42 0.42 0.12 3.19 3.88 $ $ $ 0.46 0.46 0.13 3.44 3.52 $ $ $ 0.53 0.53 0.15 3.96 4.85 $ $ $ 0.67 0.67 0.18 4.40 8.44 87% 11% 2% 100% 161 3 24 188 27 26 9 62 250 206 3 209 23.9 166.1 7,006 87% 10% 3% 100% 162 3 30 195 41 26 9 76 271 211 3 6 220 28.6 170.4 7,024 79% 16% 5% 100% 165 8 32 205 58 26 8 92 297 234 8 11 253 33.2 171.8 7,533 76% 20% 4% 100% 166 8 34 208 73 28 10 111 319 262 8 26 296 43.0 174.5 7,606 75% 21% 4% 100% 166 8 40 214 91 31 9 3 134 348 281 8 38 327 56.6 175.0 7,815 74% 22% 4% 100% 178 8 44 230 102 39 8 3 1 153 383 327 9 53 389 78.0 173.7 7,996 Transactions (in millions) Electronic Transactions 2 Items Processed3 Employees (full-time equivalent) 8.3 134.0 4,400 12.7 139.1 4,699 9 1 Per common share data adjusted for stock splits. 2 From 1981 to 2003, electronic transactions include ACH, Direct Payment, TelePago Popular, Internet Banking and ATH Network transactions in Puerto Rico. From 2004 to 2009, these numbers were adjusted to include ATH Network transactions in the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador and United States, health care transactions, wire transfers, and other electronic payment transactions in addition to those previously stated. Figures for 2010 only include electronic transactions made by Popular, Inc.’s clients and excludes electronic transactions processed by EVERTEC for other clients. 3 After the sale of EVERTEC, Popular’s information technology subsidiary, the Corporation is no longer processing items. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 $ 209.6 19,300.5 11,376.6 11,749.6 1,503.1 $ 232.3 23,160.4 13,078.8 13,672.2 1,709.1 $ 257.6 25,460.5 14,907.8 14,173.7 1,661.0 $ 276.1 28,057.1 16,057.1 14,804.9 1,993.6 $ 3,350.3 $ 4,611.7 $ 3,790.2 $ 3,578.1 $ 304.5 30,744.7 18,168.6 16,370.0 2,272.8 $ 3,965.4 $ 351.9 33,660.4 19,582.1 17,614.7 2,410.9 $ 4,476.4 $ 470.9 36,434.7 22,602.2 18,097.8 2,754.4 $ 5,960.2 $ 489.9 44,401.6 28,742.3 20,593.2 3,104.6 $ 7,685.6 $ 540.7 48,623.7 31,710.2 22,638.0 3,449.2 $ 5,836.5 $ 357.7 47,404.0 32,736.9 24,438.3 3,620.3 $ 5,003.4 $ (64.5) 44,411.4 29,911.0 28,334.4 3,581.9 $ 2,968.3 $ (1,243.9) $ (573.9) $ 137.4 38,882.8 26,276.1 27,550.2 3,268.4 $ 1,455.1 34,736.3 23,803.9 25,924.9 2,538.8 $ 1,445.4 38,723.0 26,458.9 26,762.2 3,800.5 $ 3,211.4 1.14% 15.83% 1.14% 15.41% 1.08% 15.45% 1.04% 15.00% 1.09% 14.84% 1.11% 16.29% 1.36% 19.30% 1.23% 17.60% 1.17% 17.12% 0.74% 9.73% -0.14% -2.08% -3.04% -44.47% -1.57% -32.95% 0.36% 4.37% $ $ 0.75 0.75 0.20 5.19 $ $ 0.83 0.83 0.25 5.93 $ $ 0.92 0.92 0.30 5.76 $ $ 0.99 0.99 0.32 6.96 $ $ 1.09 1.09 0.38 7.97 $ $ 1.31 1.31 0.40 9.10 $ $ 1.74 1.74 0.51 9.66 $ $ 1.79 1.79 0.62 10.95 $ $ $ 12.38 $ 17.00 $ 13.97 $ 13.16 $ 14.54 $ 16.90 $ 22.43 $ 28.83 $ $ $ 1.24 1.24 0.64 12.32 $ $ (0.27) (0.27) $ $ (4.55) (4.55) 0.64 12.12 1.98 1.97 0.64 11.82 21.15 53% 45% 2% 100% 194 8 136 338 212 4 49 17 14 33 12 2 1 1 1 5 351 689 583 61 181 825 $ $ $ 0.24 0.24 0.02 3.89 2.26 $ $ (0.06) (0.06) 0.00 3.67 3.14 $ 65% 32% 3% 100% 74% 23% 3% 100% 173 8 101 282 10 33 6 1 1 1 9 61 343 571 77 136 786 185 8 96 289 10 36 6 1 1 1 55 344 624 17 138 779 0.48 6.33 5.16 64% 33% 3% 100% 179 8 139 326 2 9 12 22 32 7 1 1 1 1 9 97 423 605 74 176 855 $ 17.95 $ 10.60 $ 52% 45% 3% 100% 59% 38% 3% 100% 191 8 142 341 158 52 15 11 32 12 2 1 1 1 7 292 633 605 65 192 862 196 8 147 351 134 51 12 24 32 13 2 1 1 1 9 280 631 615 69 187 871 71% 25% 4% 100% 71% 25% 4% 100% 72% 26% 2% 100% 68% 30% 2% 100% 66% 32% 2% 100% 62% 36% 2% 100% 55% 43% 2% 100% 199 8 91 298 137 102 47 12 10 13 2 4 327 625 442 68 99 609 199 8 95 302 136 132 61 12 11 21 3 2 4 382 684 478 37 109 624 196 8 96 300 149 154 55 20 13 25 4 2 1 4 427 727 524 39 118 681 195 8 96 299 153 195 36 18 13 29 7 2 1 1 5 460 759 539 53 131 723 193 8 97 298 181 129 43 18 11 32 8 2 1 1 5 431 729 557 57 129 743 192 8 128 328 183 114 43 18 15 30 9 2 1 1 5 421 749 568 59 163 790 74% 23% 3% 100% 201 8 63 272 117 44 10 7 3 2 183 455 391 17 71 479 111.2 171.9 198 8 89 295 128 51 48 10 8 11 2 258 553 421 59 94 574 130.5 170.9 159.4 171.0 11,501 199.5 160.2 10,651 206.0 149.9 11,334 236.6 145.3 11,037 255.7 138.5 11,474 568.5 133.9 12,139 625.9 140.3 13,210 690.2 150.0 772.7 175.2 849.4 202.2 12,508 12,303 10,587 804.1 191.7 9,407 381.6 0 8,277 8,854 10,549 10 o ur C R E E D Banco Popular is a local institution dedicating its efforts exclusively to the enhancement of the social and economic conditions in Puerto Rico and inspired by the most sound principles and fundamental practices of good banking. Popular pledges its efforts and resources to the development of a banking service for Puerto Rico within strict commercial practices and so efﬁcient that it could meet the requirements of the most progressive community in the world. These words, written in 1928 by Rafael Carrión Pacheco, Executive Vice President and President (1927-1956), embody the philosophy of Popular, Inc. in all its markets. o ur P E O P L E The men and women who work for our institution, from the highest executive to the employees who handle the most routine tasks, feel a special pride in serving our customers with care and dedication. All of them feel the personal satisfaction of belonging to the “Banco Popular Family”, which fosters affection and understanding among its members, and which at the same time ﬁrmly complies with the highest ethical and moral standards of behavior. These words by Rafael Carrión, Jr., President and Chairman of the Board (1956-1991), were written in 1988 to commemorate the 95th anniversary of Banco Popular, and reﬂect our commitment to human resources. C O R P O R A T E I N F O R M A T I O N Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Annual Meeting: The 2011 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting of Popular, Inc. will be held on Thursday, April 28, at 9:00 a.m. at Centro Europa Building in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Additional Information: The Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K and any other ﬁnancial information may also be viewed by visiting our website: www.popular.com B OA R D O F D I R E C TO R S E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R S RICHARD L. CARRIÓN RICHARD L. CARRIÓN Chairman President & Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Popular, Inc. & Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Chairman President & Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Popular, Inc. & Banco Popular de Puerto Rico ALEJANDRO M. BALLESTER JORGE A. JUNQUERA President Ballester Hermanos, Inc. MARÍA LUISA FERRÉ President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Grupo Ferré Rangel MICHAEL MASIN Private Investor MANUEL MORALES JR. President Parkview Realty, Inc. FREDERIC V. SALERNO Private Investor WILLIAM J. TEUBER JR. Vice Chairman EMC Corporation CARLOS A. UNANUE President Goya de Puerto Rico, Inc. JOSÉ R. VIZCARRONDO President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Desarrollos Metropolitanos, S.E. SAMUEL T. CÉSPEDES, ESQ. Secretary of the Board of Directors Popular, Inc. Senior Executive Vice President Chief Financial Ofﬁcer Corporate Finance Group Popular, Inc. CARLOS J. VÁZQUEZ Executive Vice President Popular, Inc. President of Banco Popular North America IGNACIO ÁLVAREZ Executive Vice President Chief Legal Ofﬁcer General Counsel & Corporate Matters Group Popular, Inc. JUAN GUERRERO Executive Vice President Financial & Insurance Services Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico AMÍLCAR JORDÁN Executive Vice President Corporate Risk Management Group Popular, Inc. GILBERTO MONZÓN Executive Vice President Individual Credit Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico EDUARDO J. NEGRÓN Executive Vice President Administration Group Popular, Inc. NÉSTOR O. RIVERA Executive Vice President Retail Banking and Operations Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico ELI SEPÚLVEDA Executive Vice President Commercial Credit Group Popular, Inc. RICARDO TORO Executive Vice President Commercial Banking Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 I N F O R M E A N U A L 11 cart a a los A C C I O N I S TA S ESTIMADOS ACCIONISTAS: Me place informar que Popular superó desafíos signiﬁcativos y terminó el 2010 en una posición considerablemente más fuerte que el año anterior. Aumentamos nuestra base de capital, solidiﬁcamos nuestra posición como líderes en Puerto Rico y continuamos progresando en la reestructuración de nuestras operaciones en los Estados Unidos. S U C E S O S C L AV E S E N E L 2 0 1 0 CAPITAL En el contexto de un proceso potencial de consolidación asistida por el FDIC en Puerto Rico, completamos con éxito un ofrecimiento público en abril, con el cual levantamos un total de $1,150 millones a un precio equivalente a $3 por acción común. Este aumento en capital, junto con una ganancia generada mediante la venta de una parte mayoritaria de EVERTEC, fortaleció sustancialmente todas nuestras relaciones de capital, colocándonos en posición para participar en la consolidación del mercado de la banca en Puerto Rico. A la vez, nos permitió enfocarnos en estrategias para mejorar la calidad general de crédito de nuestra cartera de préstamos, tales como la reclasiﬁcación y venta de carteras de alto riesgo. ADQUISICIÓN DE WESTERNBANK El cierre por la Oﬁcina del Comisionado de Instituciones Financieras, junto con el FDIC, de tres bancos en Puerto Rico, que en ese entonces componían el 20% de los activos en el mercado, alteró signiﬁcativamente el entorno local de la banca. En lo que resultó ser la transacción más grande asistida por la FDIC en el 2010, Popular adquirió aproximadamente $9,000 millones en activos y asumió aproximadamente $2,400 millones en depósitos. Esta transacción representó para Banco Popular Puerto Rico un aumento de activos con un bajo nivel de riesgo de crédito, puesto que la FDIC reembolsa a Popular el 80% de las pérdidas incurridas en los préstamos adquiridos. Además, mejoró aún más nuestra posición de líder en la isla, que desde septiembre del 2010, goza de una participación de mercado en depósitos, excluyendo depósitos a través de corredores, de 42% y participación de mercado en préstamos de 32%. VENTA DE EVERTEC Como parte de nuestro plan de capital, a principios de año lanzamos un proceso para vender todo o una parte mayoritaria de EVERTEC. En junio ﬁrmamos un acuerdo para vender una participación de 51% a Apollo Management. La transacción, que cerró en septiembre y valoró a EVERTEC en aproximadamente $870 millones, generó un ingreso neto de $531 millones. Se trató de una decisión difícil, puesto que esta compañía, este grupo de compañeros, se había desarrollado dentro de nuestra organización. Pero la venta era necesaria para lograr otros objetivos importantes. ESTAMOS ORGULLOSOS DE EVERTEC Y SU EVOLUCIÓN, Y EXTREMADAMENTE SATISFECHOS CON LA TRANSACCIÓN, QUE NOS PERMITIÓ RETENER UNA PARTE SIGNIFICATIVA COMO PROPIETARIOS. Tanto como socios de Apollo y el cliente más grande de EVERTEC, nos entusiasma poder participar en el crecimiento y en el éxito en esta nueva etapa. RECLASIFICACIÓN DE CARTERAS DE PRÉSTAMO PARA VENTA FUTURA Con miras a reducir el riesgo de crédito en nuestro estado de situación, en diciembre de 2010 reclasiﬁcamos aproximadamente $1,000 millones de préstamos como disponibles para la venta con la intención de venderlos en los próximos meses. En Puerto Rico, la reclasiﬁcación comprendió aproximadamente $603 millones de préstamos de construcción y comerciales 12 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 I N F O R M E A N U A L cart a a los A C C I O N I S TA S de bienes raíces. En enero de 2011 ﬁrmamos una carta de intención no vinculante para vender la mayoría de los préstamos reclasiﬁcados. En los Estados Unidos, reclasiﬁcamos aproximadamente $396 millones de hipotecas residenciales no conformes y estamos considerando activamente diversas alternativas potenciales de venta. Aunque la reclasiﬁcación de estas carteras comprendió marcar estos préstamos de acuerdo con el mercado, con un gasto incremental en la provisión de $176 millones, la venta de estos activos reducirá sustancialmente en nuestros libros los activos no acumulativos y nos permitirá reenfocar la organización y redistribuir los recursos para generar nuevos negocios. R E S U LTA D O S F I N A N C I E R O S Y D E S E M P E Ñ O D E L A AC C I Ó N POPULAR LOGRÓ UN INGRESO NETO DE $137.4 MILLONES EN 2010, COMPARADO CON UNA PÉRDIDA NETA DE $573.9 MILLONES EN 2009. El resultado de 2010 incluye $531 millones por la ganancia en la venta de una participación mayoritaria de EVERTEC, así como ingreso adicional de las operaciones de Westernbank adquiridas en abril de 2010, parcialmente contrarrestado por $176 millones en cargos relacionados con la reclasiﬁcación de varias carteras a préstamos disponibles para la venta, entre otras partidas. Aunque el crédito continuaba siendo el asunto crítico en el 2010, por primera vez en cinco años, vimos señales de estabilización. La provisión para pérdidas en préstamos en el 2010 totalizó $1,000 millones, comparada con $1,400 millones en 2009. Excluyendo el impacto del gasto relacionado con la reclasiﬁcación de varias carteras como disponibles para la venta, la provisión fue 41% más baja que en 2009. El precio de nuestra acción cerró en el 2010 en $3.14. Aunque esto no cambia el hecho de que nuestra acción perdió el 85% de su valor en los últimos cinco años, el 2010 fue el primer año desde el 2004 en que la acción tuvo un desempeño positivo de año a año. Con una ganancia de 39%, BPOP sobrepasó el desempeño de los índices S&P 500 y Keefe Bank, así como el de nuestras instituciones pares en los Estados Unidos y todos los bancos en Puerto Rico. B A N C O P O P U L A R P U E R TO R I C O DURANTE EL 2010, BANCO POPULAR PUERTO RICO (BPPR) ENFOCÓ LA MAYOR PARTE DE SUS ESFUERZOS EN LA INTEGRACIÓN DE LAS OPERACIONES DE WESTERNBANK Y EN MANEJAR LA CALIDAD DE CRÉDITO. En el 2010 BPPR adquirió aproximadamente $9,000 millones en préstamos y asumió aproximadamente $2,400 millones en depósitos. Una adquisición de esta magnitud normalmente requiere atención signiﬁcativa, pero el margen de tiempo limitado y las complejidades relacionadas con una transacción asistida por el FDIC exigieron aun más recursos a ﬁn de garantizar una transición sin inconvenientes. Me place informar que completamos la conversión de los sistemas y de sucursales en sólo cuatro meses tras la adquisición, apalancando nuestra infraestructura para generar sinergias signiﬁcativas. AGREGAMOS DOCE SUCURSALES A NUESTRA RED Y RETUVIMOS APROXIMADAMENTE EL 57% DE LOS EMPLEADOS DE WESTERNBANK. EL NÚMERO DE EMPLEADOS EN BPPR SE ENCUENTRA EN PRÁCTICAMENTE EL MISMO NIVEL QUE EN EL 2007, MIENTRAS QUE LOS ACTIVOS HAN AUMENTADO POR 8% DURANTE ESTE PERÍODO. La adquisición de Westernbank también ofrece numerosas oportunidades para hacer crecer y adelantar nuestro negocio. Westernbank tenía aproximadamente 240,000 clientes, 140,000 de los cuales no tenía una relación con Popular al momento de la transacción. Además, la mayoría solamente tenía una relación bancaria con Westernbank, lo que se traduce en grandes posibilidades de venta cruzada para nosotros. Al ﬁnal del año, habíamos retenido más del 90% de los clientes que asumimos, y les estamos ofreciendo la gama completa de productos, servicios y canales de Popular para expandir nuestra relación con ellos. La recesión prolongada en la economía de Puerto Rico continuó teniendo un impacto negativo en la calidad de crédito de BPPR durante el 2010. Las pérdidas netas en préstamos totalizaron $680 millones, un aumento de 33%, VALORES Institucionales COMPROMISO SOCIAL CLIENTE INTEGRIDAD Trabajamos mano a mano con nuestras comunidades. Estamos comprometidos a trabajar activamente para promover el desarrollo social y económico de nuestras comunidades. Desarrollamos relaciones para toda la vida. La relación con el cliente está por encima de una transacción particular. Añadimos valor a cada interacción ofreciendo servicio personalizado de alta calidad, y soluciones adecuadas, eﬁcientes e innovadoras. Honramos la conﬁanza depositada en nosotros. Nos desempeñamos bajo las normas más estrictas de ética y moral, manifestadas diariamente a través de todas nuestras decisiones y acciones. 13 LOS CIMIENTOS DE BPPR PERMANECEN TAN SÓLIDOS COMO SIEMPRE, SI ES QUE NO LO ESTÁN MÁS. COMO LA FRANQUICIA BANCARIA LÍDER EN PUERTO RICO, ESTAMOS BIEN POSICIONADOS PARA BENEFICIARNOS DE LA EVENTUAL ESTABILIZACIÓN DE LA ECONOMÍA. PRETENDEMOS CAPITALIZAR EN ESTAS FORTALEZAS PARA AUMENTAR NUESTRA PARTICIPACIÓN EN EL MERCADO MEDIANTE UN RENOVADO ENFOQUE EN EL SERVICIO AL CLIENTE Y EN LA EFICIENCIA. comparadas con el año anterior, incluyendo $153 millones relacionados con la decisión de tirar a pérdida de inmediato las cantidades anteriormente reservadas para préstamos deteriorados dependientes de colateral. Pérdidas netas más altas en las carteras de construcción, comerciales e hipotecarias fueron parcialmente balanceadas por una mejora en la cartera de consumo. Los préstamos no acumulativos retenidos para inversión alcanzaron $1,100 millones al ﬁnalizar el 2010, lo que constituye 25% más bajo que en el 2009. Esta disminución se debió mayormente a la reclasiﬁcación discutida anteriormente de aproximadamente $603 millones como disponibles para la venta, la mayoría de ellos en un estado de no acumulativos, así como a tirar a pérdida los préstamos deteriorados dependientes de colateral mencionados arriba. Los grupos designados para manejar la calidad del crédito han trabajado de forma diligente para minimizar las pérdidas. La unidad de crédito comercial se concentró en la detección temprana de préstamos con problemas y la transferencia rápida a un grupo especializado que desarrolla planes individuales de acción para cada préstamo que recibe. El equipo de préstamos de construcción continuó trabajando en acelerar las tasas de absorción mediante iniciativas dinámicas de mercadeo y ventas, a la vez que unió fuerzas con Popular Mortgage para aprovechar los incentivos para la compra de viviendas introducidos por el gobierno de Puerto Rico en la última parte del año. El grupo de mitigación de pérdidas de consumo implantó una estrategia más orientada al cliente, mejorando sus instalaciones y creando un centro dedicado para llamadas. BPPR registró un ingreso neto de $47 millones en el 2010, comparado con un ingreso neto de $158 millones en el 2009. Esta reducción se debe mayormente a una provisión para pérdidas en préstamos persistentemente alta, así como a un ingreso de $228 millones en la venta de valores registrada en el 2009. Sin embargo, estamos conﬁados en que la futura venta de la cartera reclasiﬁcada, así como los esfuerzos por manejar la calidad de los préstamos en nuestros libros, resultarán en un desempeño de crédito mejor en el 2011, disminuyendo la presión sobre nuestros resultados. Los cimientos de BPPR permanecen tan sólidos como siempre, si es que no lo están más. Como la franquicia bancaria líder en Puerto Rico, estamos bien posicionados para beneﬁciarnos de la eventual estabilización de la economía. Pretendemos capitalizar en estas fortalezas para aumentar nuestra participación en el mercado mediante un renovado enfoque en el servicio al cliente y en la eﬁciencia. B A N C O P O P U L A R N O R T H A M E R I C A BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA (BPNA) CERRÓ EL 2010 CON UNA PÉRDIDA NETA DE $340 MILLONES. AUNQUE AÚN ESTÁ LEJOS DE DONDE QUEREMOS QUE SE ENCUENTRE BPNA, ESTO SIGNIFICÓ UNA MEJORA SIGNIFICATIVA SOBRE LOS $726 MILLONES EN PÉRDIDAS NETAS REGISTRADAS EN EL 2009. La reducción en la pérdida neta fue impulsada por una provisión más baja para pérdidas en préstamos debido a una mejora general en la calidad del crédito, parcialmente contrarrestado por el impacto de varias transacciones completadas al ﬁnal del año. Primero, a ﬁn de enfocarnos en vender la porción más riesgosa de nuestra cartera de hipotecas residenciales no conformes, reclasiﬁcamos aproximadamente $396 millones en préstamos como disponibles para la venta, lo cual resultó en un gasto adicional de provisión de $120 millones. Además, pusimos ﬁn a aproximadamente $417 millones en préstamos de alto costo, incurriendo en aproximadamente $22 millones en penalidades por prepago. A pesar de que estas transacciones tuvieron un impacto signiﬁcativo en el 2010, BPNA deberá beneﬁciarse en el futuro de costos más bajos en ﬁnanciamiento y una mejora en la calidad del crédito. BPNA CONTINUÓ LA IMPLANTACIÓN DE UN PLAN ANUNCIADO HACIA FINES DEL 2008 QUE BUSCA ENFOCAR LOS ESFUERZOS Y RECURSOS EN EL NEGOCIO BÁSICO DE BANCA DE LA COMUNIDAD. Como parte del esfuerzo de optimizar la red de sucursales, completamos consolidaciones adicionales de cinco sucursales en el 2010, con lo cual llevamos el número total de sucursales de 147 en el 2007 a 96 a ﬁnales del 2010. Para expandir el acceso libre de costo de los clientes a los cajeros automáticos, EXCELENCIA INNOVACIÓN NUESTRA GENTE RENDIMIENTO Aspiramos a ser mejores cada día. Creemos que sólo hay una forma de hacer las cosas: bien hechas desde el principio y excediendo expectativas. Somos propulsores de futuro. Fomentamos la búsqueda incesante de ideas y soluciones innovadoras en todo lo que hacemos para realzar nuestra ventaja competitiva. Contamos con el mejor talento. Somos líderes y trabajamos en equipo para el éxito dentro de un ambiente de trabajo que se caracteriza por el cariño y la disciplina. Tenemos un compromiso total con nuestros accionistas. Nos exigimos un alto nivel de eﬁciencia, individual y en equipo, para obtener resultados ﬁnancieros altos y consistentes, fundamentados en una visión a largo plazo. 14 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 I N F O R M E A N U A L carta a lo s A C C I O N I S T A S ﬁrmamos un acuerdo con Allpoint, una red libre de cargo adicional, que cuenta con más de 40,000 cajeros en toda la nación. También mejoramos nuestro servicio de banca por Internet, presentando una composición de mayor facilidad para el usuario, mejorando el navegar en ella y agregando capacidad de uso, tal como la habilidad de poder abrir cuentas transaccionales y certiﬁcados de depósito en línea. Sólo siete meses luego de ser lanzada, el número de usuarios activos de nuestra plataforma de Internet aumentó 19%. Continuamos expandiendo nuestro ofrecimiento de productos con la introducción de dos tarjetas de crédito orientadas a segmentos especíﬁcos, aprovechando la amplia experiencia de Banco Popular Puerto Rico en esta área. En cuanto a los préstamos comerciales y de construcción, el 2010 marcó la reversión del deterioro severo en la calidad de crédito que comenzó en el 2006. Los préstamos no acumulativos retenidos para inversión en estas categorías bajaron 28% durante el año y las pérdidas netas hubieran estado a tenor de las del 2009 si no hubiera sido por la decisión de acelerar la pérdida de las cantidades anteriormente reservadas para préstamos deteriorados dependientes de colateral. Al igual que el resto de la industria, el crecimiento de préstamos orgánicos ha constituido un desafío debido a una demanda reducida. Como resultado de la reducción en el 2010, la cartera de préstamos comerciales de BPNA se contrajo por 19%, aunque 60% de esa reducción provino de los segmentos de negocios que descontinuamos como parte del plan de reestructuración. Uno de los sucesos más signiﬁcativos del año fue el reposicionamiento de la marca de Banco Popular North America en la región de Illinois. La estrategia y el nuevo nombre, Popular Community Bank, tiene como ﬁn presentar a los clientes no hispanos una propuesta más inclusiva y acogedora a la vez que mantiene el sólido legado que tiene Popular dentro del mercado hispano. El piloto de reposicionamiento, lanzado en agosto, fue apoyado por mejoras a las sucursales, una nueva vestimenta corporativa para nuestros empleados y una campaña publicitaria. Los resultados iniciales han sido alentadores, reﬂejando un aumento en negocios de clientes no hispanos. Continuaremos monitorizando los resultados para decidir si lo implantamos en otras regiones. Convencidos de que nuestros esfuerzos en los Estados Unidos se beneﬁciarían grandemente mediante un equipo gerencial más fuerte y más uniﬁcado, en septiembre nombramos a Carlos J. Vázquez Presidente de Banco Popular North America. Carlos, quien en ese momento dirigía el Grupo de Préstamos a Individuos en Puerto Rico, también había estado dirigiendo las Operaciones de Banca Individual en BPNA. Como se esperaba, Carlos asumió su puesto con entusiasmo, liderando los esfuerzos antes mencionados y proveyendo al equipo de BPNA la energía y la dirección necesarias para continuar la exitosa implantación de nuestro plan de reestructuración para llevar a BPNA a niveles rentables cuanto antes. N U E S T R A O R G A N I Z A C I Ó N En el 2010, Ignacio Álvarez se unió a Popular como Principal Oﬁcial Legal. Ignacio trae consigo una amplia experiencia en la banca, en ﬁnanzas corporativas y en leyes de valores, y ha sido una gran adición para nuestro consejo gerencial. En mayo, David H. Chafey, Jr. concluyó su carrera en Popular. Le agradecemos sus muchos años de servicio y aportación a nuestra organización. LOS LOGROS QUE HE COMPARTIDO CON USTEDES SON EL RESULTADO DIRECTO DEL TRABAJO DE 8,277 EMPLEADOS DEDICADOS QUE A TRAVÉS DEL AÑO SOBREPASARON EL LLAMADO DEL DEBER PARA BENEFICIO DE LA ORGANIZACIÓN. También quiero expresar mi gratitud a la Junta de Directores por su gran aportación. Se habla mucho de gerencia corporativa, y los estándares y reglas abundan. Pero para mí, la verdadera prueba de una gerencia corporativa sólida es cuando, en los tiempos difíciles, una Junta logra el balance correcto entre asesoramiento y respaldo. Popular está bendecido por contar con una Junta que continuamente ha logrado este balance a través de estos años críticos. Un miembro muy especial de nuestra Junta, Frederic V. Salerno, no se presentará para reelección en 2011 para dedicar más tiempo a otras responsabilidades profesionales. Fred ha sido parte integral de nuestra Junta desde que se convirtió en miembro en 2003, desempeñando papeles importantes tales como Principal Director y Presidente del Comité de Auditoría con gran destreza, asombrosa dedicación y una integridad incuestionable. Aunque otros miembros de la Junta y la gerencia echaremos de menos su experiencia, orientación y camaradería, Fred siempre seguirá siendo un amigo cercano de Popular. El Comité de Gerencia Corporativa y Nominaciones de la Junta ha comenzado el proceso de identiﬁcar a un nuevo candidato, mientras que William J. Teuber, quien ha sido miembro de la Junta desde 2004, asumirá el papel de Principal Director. Aún encaramos desafíos, incluyendo un crecimiento económico limitado en nuestros principales mercados, el impacto de nuevas regulaciones bancarias y un aumento en la competencia en la medida que el mercado bancario en Puerto Rico se recupera de los eventos del 2010. Sin embargo, estamos conﬁados que, dados los pasos tomados en el 2010 y nuestras estrategias para el 2011, Popular está bien posicionado para alcanzar rentabilidad operacional en 2011. Con un continuo optimismo y una renovada fortaleza, trabajaremos incesantemente para lograrlo. Sinceramente, RICHARD L. CARRIÓN PRESIDENTE DE LA JUNTA DE DIRECTORES PRESIDENTE, PRINCIPAL OFICIAL EJECUTIVO 15 puntos principales de 2010 CIFRAS Y DATOS CLAVES P O P U L A R , I N C . PUNTOS PRINCIPALES DE 2010 35ta compañía tenedora de acciones bancarias más grande en los Estados Unidos1 con $38,700 millones en activos2 y 8,277 empleados2. (cid:154) Generó $1,600 millones en capital mediante un ofrecimiento secundario de 383 millones adicionales de acciones comunes en abril, y la venta de la participación mayoritaria del procesador de tecnología EVERTEC a Apollo Management, L.P., proveyendo a la corporación una base robusta de capital para cumplir con los requisitos de Basilea 3. (cid:154)(cid:1)Completó la adquisición asistida por la FDIC de Westernbank Puerto Rico, agregando $5,000 millones en activos que devengan intereses y cerca de 140,000 clientes que anteriormente no tenían ninguna relación con Popular. (cid:154)(cid:1)Reclasiﬁcó aproximadamente $1,000 millones de préstamos retenidos en cartera como disponibles para la venta, reduciendo los préstamos no acumulativos retenidos en cartera por aproximadamente $608 millones. DATOS CLAVES (cid:154)(cid:1)Más de 1.5 millones de clientes (cid:154)(cid:1)193 sucursales y 54 oﬁcinas a través de Puerto Rico y las Islas Vírgenes (cid:154)(cid:1)6,531 empleados a tiempo completo2 (cid:154)(cid:1)641 cajeros automáticos a través de Puerto Rico e Islas Vírgenes (cid:154)(cid:1)Líder en participación en el mercado en total de depósitos (42%)1 y total de préstamos (32%)1 (cid:154)(cid:1)$29,300 millones en activos, $19,500 millones en préstamos y $20,200 millones en depósitos2 B A N C O P O P U L A R P U E R TO R I C O B A N C O P O P U L A R N O R T H A M E R I C A DATOS CLAVES (cid:154) Aproximadamente 415,000 clientes (cid:154) 96 sucursales a través de cinco estados (Florida, California, Nueva York, Nueva Jersey e Illinois) (cid:154)(cid:1)1,393 empleados a tiempo completo2 (cid:154)(cid:1)Acceso a más de 40,000 cajeros automáticos a través de la red Allpoint (cid:154) E-LOAN tenía $580 millones en depósitos2 y aproximadamente 28,600 clientes (cid:154)(cid:1)$9,000 millones en activos, $6,900 millones en préstamos y $6,600 en total de depósitos2 1 Al 30/9/2010 2 Al 31/12/2010 16 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 I N F O R M E A N U A L un l egado D E C O M P R O M I S O DESDE SU FUNDACIÓN HACE 117 AÑOS, POPULAR HA DEMOSTRADO UN COMPROMISO SÓLIDO HACIA LAS COMUNIDADES QUE SIRVE. GUIADOS FIRMEMENTE POR NUESTROS VALORES, CONTRIBUIMOS DE NUMEROSAS FORMAS A REALZAR LA CALIDAD DE VIDA DE MILES DE PERSONAS. EN 2010, POPULAR EXPANDIÓ SU ALCANCE HACIA EL DESARROLLO SOCIAL MEDIANTE ESFUERZOS DE COLABORACIÓN Y ALIANZAS CON OTRAS ORGANIZACIONES. D O N A T I V O S A R T E S Y M Ú S I C A Fundación Banco Popular respalda organizaciones sin ﬁnes de lucro enfocadas en mejorar la calidad de la educación que reciben los estudiantes y en el desarrollo social y económico de nuestras comunidades. En 2010, la Fundación invirtió $1,444,883 en apoyo a 73 organizaciones en Puerto Rico. En los Estados Unidos, Banco Popular Foundation invirtió $116,350 para apoyar a 27 organizaciones sin ﬁnes de lucro. Fundación Banco Popular promueve el arte y la música como parte integral de la educación de los estudiantes. Desde 2008, la Fundación se ha unido a la ﬁrma local Méndez & Co. en el programa Berklee en Puerto Rico llevado a cabo por miembros de la facultad del reconocido Berklee College of Music. En 2010, más de 150 estudiantes recibieron clases de música durante el taller de una semana de duración. E D U C A C I Ó N En un esfuerzo por multiplicar nuestro impacto individual en la educación sin ﬁnes de lucro, la Fundación se unió a otras tres fundaciones locales y a Hispanics in Philanthropy para crear el Puerto Rico Donor’s Education Collaborative (PRDEC). Este es el primer fondo colaborativo creado en Puerto Rico para maximizar los recursos disponibles y donativos para organizaciones sin ﬁnes de lucro en el área de la educación. En 2010, el PRDEC otorgó $320,000 a siete organizaciones locales. En 2010, la Fundación contribuyó $321,200 en becas a 122 estudiantes mediante el Fondo de Becas Rafael Carrión, Jr., un programa para hijos de empleados de Popular. Otros programas educativos incluyen fondos dotales para estudiantes puertorriqueños en siete universidades, y el Premio a la Excelencia Académica Rafael Carrión, Jr. que otorgó $56,250 a 75 estudiantes de cuarto año de escuela superior. Por quinto año consecutivo, la Fundación Banco Popular y la Fundación Luis A. Ferré patrocinaron el proyecto Revive la Música, que promueve la educación musical para niños y jóvenes. Este programa sirve como plataforma para desarrollar el talento musical a través de la donación de instrumentos, conciertos comunitarios, talleres y conciertos por reconocidos músicos puertorriqueños para beneﬁcio de los participantes y el público en general. C O M P R O M I S O D E L O S E M P L E A D O S La participación de los empleados va mucho más allá de aportaciones monetarias. En los Estados Unidos, empleados de BPNA dedicaron 2,800 horas de servicio comunitario durante el Día de Hacer la Diferencia 2010 beneﬁciando a 32 organizaciones sin ﬁnes de lucro. En Puerto Rico, el proyecto Mi Escuela en Tus Manos por sí solo contó con el respaldo de 1,600 empleados de Popular que ayudaron a pintar y restaurar 70 escuelas públicas a las que asisten 18,000 estudiantes. FUNDACIÓN BANCO POPULAR (P.R.) DONATIVOS OTORGADOS (1990-2010) BANCO POPULAR FOUNDATION (EE.UU.) DONATIVOS OTORGADOS (2010) Dólares en miles DONATIVOS ORGANIZACIONES 80 40 0 $50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Dólares en miles DONATIVOS ORGANIZACIONES 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 California Florida Central Sur de Florida Illinois Nueva York Metro $2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 17 valoramos nuestro compromi so social Trabajamos mano a mano con nuestras comunidades. YMCA de San Juan La generosidad de los empleados de Popular también se maniﬁesta cada año a través de aportaciones voluntarias a la Fundación. En 2010, el 75% de los empleados mostró su generoso compromiso con la comunidad al contribuir $545,198 a la Fundación mediante deducción de nómina. Nuestra Escuela D A N D O L A M A N O A H A I T Í En 2010, Popular respondió de forma asertiva para apoyar a nuestros vecinos en Haití afectados por el terremoto. Fundación Banco Popular estableció un centro de acopio en el que se clasiﬁcaron y distribuyeron en 1,260 cajas ropa y alimentos donados en las sucursales del Banco, y luego enviadas a ese país. Cerca de 300 empleados voluntarios participaron en este esfuerzo. La Fundación abrió una cuenta para recibir donativos del pueblo puertorriqueño en respaldo de los esfuerzos en Haití de una organización local de salud. Se recaudaron más de $320,000 para apoyar los esfuerzos médicos voluntarios y el establecimiento de una clínica de salud en las afueras de Puerto Príncipe. La Fundación también contribuyó a un taller-conferencia para profesionales respecto a sugerencias para reconstruir la capital del país. El Banco abrió una segunda cuenta para beneﬁciar a la Cruz Roja Americana de Puerto Rico en sus esfuerzos pro Haití. En esta cuenta se recaudaron $920,000. Banco Popular hizo un donativo directo a este fondo para que alcanzara $1 millón. I N V I R T I E N D O E N E L F U T U R O Banco Popular cree ﬁrmemente que un pueblo bien informado sobre asuntos ﬁnancieros puede contribuir grandemente al bienestar personal, de la comunidad y del país. Por ello, en 2010 se lanzó un programa de educación ﬁnanciera. En total, se efectuaron 107 talleres a través de Puerto Rico con la participación de 4,107 adultos. Banco Popular Puerto Rico (BPPR) fue reconocido por el American Banker’s Association por sus esfuerzos en llevar a cabo el proyecto Enseñe a los Niños a Ahorrar. Banco Popular impactó a 109,554 estudiantes de escuela elemental, más que cualquier otro banco en la nación. Los empleados de BPPR personalmente ofrecieron las clases de educación para el ahorro, y les proveyeron a los estudiantes las herramientas para tomar decisiones de ﬁnanzas personales de forma más informada y acertada. El compromiso de SERVICIO de Popular se expresa de de numerosas formas. Ya sea como proveedor de servicios ﬁnancieros o como propulsor para el progreso en nuestras comunidades, nos guiamos por nuestra dedicación invariable de servir. Proyecto Enseñe a los Niños a Ahorrar Mi Escuela en Tus Manos Revive La Música 18 P O P U L A R , I N C . 2 0 1 0 I N F O R M E A N U A L Po pu l ar , Inc. 25 A ño s R E S U M E N F I N A N C I E R O H I S T Ó R I C O (Dólares en millones, excepto información por acción) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Información Financiera Seleccionada Ingreso Neto (Pérdida Neta) Activos Préstamos Netos Depósitos Capital de Accionistas Valor Agregado en el Mercado Rendimiento de Activos (ROA) Rendimiento de Capital (ROE) Por Acción Común1 Ingreso Neto (Pérdida Neta) – Básico Ingreso Neto (Pérdida Neta) – Diluido Dividendos (Declarados) Valor en los Libros Precio en el Mercado Activos por Área Geográfica Puerto Rico Estados Unidos Caribe y Latinoamérica Total Sistema de Distribución Tradicional Sucursales Bancarias Puerto Rico Islas Vírgenes Estados Unidos Subtotal Oficinas No Bancarias Popular Financial Holdings Popular Cash Express Popular Finance Popular Auto Popular Leasing, U.S.A. Popular Mortgage Popular Securities Popular Insurance Popular Insurance Agency U.S.A. Popular Insurance, V.I. E-LOAN EVERTEC Subtotal Total Sistema Electrónico de Distribución Cajeros Automáticos Propios y Administrados Puerto Rico Islas Vírgenes Estados Unidos Total Transacciones (en millones) Transacciones Electrónicas 2 Efectos Procesados 3 $ 38.3 4,531.8 2,271.0 3,820.2 283.1 $ 38.3 5,389.6 2,768.5 4,491.6 308.2 $ 47.4 5,706.5 3,096.3 4,715.8 341.9 $ 56.3 5,972.7 3,320.6 4,926.3 383.0 $ 63.4 8,983.6 $ 64.6 8,780.3 5,373.3 7,422.7 588.9 5,195.6 7,207.1 631.8 $ 85.1 10,002.3 5,252.1 8,038.7 $ 109.4 11,513.4 6,346.9 8,522.7 $ 124.7 12,778.4 7,781.3 $ 146.4 15,675.5 8,677.5 9,012.4 9,876.7 752.1 834.2 1,002.4 1,141.7 $ 185.2 16,764.1 9,779.0 10,763.3 1,262.5 $ 304.0 $ 260.0 $ 355.0 $ 430.1 $ 479.1 $ 579.0 $ 987.8 $ 1,014.7 $ 923.7 $ 1,276.8 $ 2,230.5 0.88% 15.12% 0.76% 13.09% 0.85% 14.87% 0.99% 15.87% 1.09% 15.55% 0.72% 10.57% 0.89% 12.72% 1.02% 13.80% 1.02% 13.80% 1.04% 14.22% 1.14% 16.17% $ $ $ $ 0.25 0.25 0.08 1.73 $ 2.00 $ 0.24 0.24 0.09 1.89 1.67 $ $ $ 0.30 0.30 0.09 2.10 2.22 $ $ $ $ 0.35 0.35 0.10 2.35 $ 2.69 $ 0.40 0.40 0.10 2.46 2.00 89% 9% 2% 100% 173 3 24 200 26 9 35 235 211 3 214 18.0 164.0 7,023 $ $ $ 0.27 0.27 0.10 2.63 2.41 $ $ $ 0.35 0.35 0.10 2.88 3.78 $ $ $ 0.42 0.42 0.12 3.19 3.88 $ $ $ 0.46 0.46 0.13 3.44 3.52 $ $ $ 0.53 0.53 0.15 3.96 4.85 $ $ $ 0.67 0.67 0.18 4.40 8.44 87% 11% 2% 100% 161 3 24 188 27 26 9 62 250 206 3 209 23.9 166.1 7,006 87% 10% 3% 100% 162 3 30 195 41 26 9 76 271 211 3 6 220 28.6 170.4 7,024 79% 16% 5% 100% 165 8 32 205 58 26 8 92 297 234 8 11 253 33.2 171.8 7,533 76% 20% 4% 100% 166 8 34 208 73 28 10 111 319 262 8 26 296 43.0 174.5 7,606 75% 21% 4% 100% 166 8 40 214 91 31 9 3 134 348 281 8 38 327 56.6 175.0 7,815 74% 22% 4% 100% 178 8 44 230 102 39 8 3 1 153 383 327 9 53 389 78.0 173.7 7,996 92% 6% 2% 100% 128 3 10 141 18 4 22 163 151 3 154 16.1 161.9 5,213 92% 7% 1% 100% 124 3 9 136 94% 5% 1% 100% 126 3 9 138 93% 6% 1% 100% 126 3 10 139 14 17 136 113 113 8.3 134.0 14 152 136 3 139 12.7 139.1 4,699 17 156 153 3 156 14.9 159.8 5,131 Empleados (equivalente a tiempo completo) 4,400 19 1 Datos ajustados por las divisiones en acciones. 2 Del 1981 al 2003, las transacciones electrónicas incluyen transacciones ACH, Pago Directo, TelePago Popular, Banca por Internet y transacciones por la Red ATH en Puerto Rico. Desde el 2004 hasta el 2009, estos números incluyen el total de transacciones por la Red ATH en República Dominicana, Costa Rica, El Salvador y Estados Unidos, transacciones de facturación médica, transferencias cablegráficas y otros pagos electrónicos además de lo previamente señalado. Para el 2010, esta cifra incluye solamente las transacciones realizadas por los clientes de Popular, Inc. y excluye las transacciones procesadas por EVERTEC para otros clientes. 3 A partir del 2010, luego de la venta de EVERTEC, la subsidiaria de técnología de Popular, Inc., no se continuarán procesando efectos electrónicos. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 $ 209.6 19,300.5 11,376.6 11,749.6 1,503.1 $ 232.3 23,160.4 13,078.8 13,672.2 1,709.1 $ 257.6 25,460.5 14,907.8 14,173.7 1,661.0 $ 276.1 28,057.1 16,057.1 14,804.9 1,993.6 $ 3,350.3 $ 4,611.7 $ 3,790.2 $ 3,578.1 $ 304.5 30,744.7 18,168.6 16,370.0 2,272.8 $ 3,965.4 $ 351.9 33,660.4 19,582.1 17,614.7 2,410.9 $ 4,476.4 $ 470.9 36,434.7 22,602.2 18,097.8 2,754.4 $ 5,960.2 $ 489.9 44,401.6 28,742.3 20,593.2 3,104.6 $ 7,685.6 $ 540.7 48,623.7 31,710.2 22,638.0 3,449.2 $ 5,836.5 $ 357.7 47,404.0 32,736.9 24,438.3 3,620.3 $ 5,003.4 $ (64.5) 44,411.4 29,911.0 28,334.4 3,581.9 $ 2,968.3 $ (1,243.9) $ (573.9) 38,882.8 26,276.1 27,550.2 3,268.4 $ 1,455.1 34,736.3 23,803.9 25,924.9 2,538.8 $ 1,445.4 $ 137.4 38,723.0 26,458.9 26,762.2 3,800.5 $ 3,211.4 1.14% 15.83% 1.14% 15.41% 1.08% 15.45% 1.04% 15.00% 1.09% 14.84% 1.11% 16.29% 1.36% 19.30% 1.23% 17.60% 1.17% 17.12% 0.74% 9.73% -0.14% -2.08% -3.04% -44.47% -1.57% -32.95% 0.36% 4.37% $ $ 0.75 0.75 0.20 5.19 $ $ 0.83 0.83 0.25 5.93 $ $ 0.92 0.92 0.30 5.76 $ $ 0.99 0.99 0.32 6.96 $ $ 1.09 1.09 0.38 7.97 $ $ 1.31 1.31 0.40 9.10 $ $ 1.74 1.74 0.51 9.66 $ $ 1.79 1.79 0.62 10.95 $ $ $ 12.38 $ 17.00 $ 13.97 $ 13.16 $ 14.54 $ 16.90 $ 22.43 $ 28.83 $ $ $ 1.24 1.24 0.64 12.32 $ $ (0.27) (0.27) $ $ (4.55) (4.55) 0.64 12.12 1.98 1.97 0.64 11.82 21.15 53% 45% 2% 100% 194 8 136 338 212 4 49 17 14 33 12 2 1 1 1 5 351 689 583 61 181 825 $ $ $ 0.24 0.24 0.02 3.89 2.26 $ $ (0.06) (0.06) 0.00 3.67 3.14 $ 65% 32% 3% 100% 74% 23% 3% 100% 173 8 101 282 10 33 6 1 1 1 9 61 343 571 77 136 786 185 8 96 289 10 36 6 1 1 1 55 344 624 17 138 779 0.48 6.33 5.16 64% 33% 3% 100% 179 8 139 326 2 9 12 22 32 7 1 1 1 1 9 97 423 605 74 176 855 $ 17.95 $ 10.60 $ 52% 45% 3% 100% 59% 38% 3% 100% 191 8 142 341 158 52 15 11 32 12 2 1 1 1 7 292 633 605 65 192 862 196 8 147 351 134 51 12 24 32 13 2 1 1 1 9 280 631 615 69 187 871 71% 25% 4% 100% 71% 25% 4% 100% 72% 26% 2% 100% 68% 30% 2% 100% 66% 32% 2% 100% 62% 36% 2% 100% 55% 43% 2% 100% 199 8 91 298 137 102 47 12 10 13 2 4 327 625 442 68 99 609 199 8 95 302 136 132 61 12 11 21 3 2 4 382 684 478 37 109 624 196 8 96 300 149 154 55 20 13 25 4 2 1 4 427 727 524 39 118 681 195 8 96 299 153 195 36 18 13 29 7 2 1 1 5 460 759 539 53 131 723 193 8 97 298 181 129 43 18 11 32 8 2 1 1 5 431 729 557 57 129 743 192 8 128 328 183 114 43 18 15 30 9 2 1 1 5 421 749 568 59 163 790 74% 23% 3% 100% 201 8 63 272 117 44 10 7 3 2 183 455 391 17 71 479 111.2 171.9 198 8 89 295 128 51 48 10 8 11 2 258 553 421 59 94 574 130.5 170.9 159.4 171.0 11,501 199.5 160.2 10,651 206.0 149.9 11,334 236.6 145.3 11,037 255.7 138.5 11,474 568.5 133.9 12,139 625.9 140.3 13,210 690.2 150.0 772.7 175.2 849.4 202.2 12,508 12,303 10,587 804.1 191.7 9,407 381.6 0 8,277 8,854 10,549 20 nu est ro C R E D O El Banco Popular es una institución genuinamente nativa dedicada exclusivamente a trabajar por el bienestar social y económico de Puerto Rico e inspirada en los principios más sanos y fundamentales de una buena práctica bancaria. El Popular tiene empeñados sus esfuerzos y voluntad al desarrollo de un servicio bancario para Puerto Rico dentro de normas estrictamente comerciales y tan eﬁciente como pueda requerir la comunidad más progresista del mundo. Estas palabras, escritas en 1928 por don Rafael Carrión Pacheco, Vicepresidente Ejecutivo y Presidente (1927-1956), representan el pensamiento que rige a Popular, Inc. en todos sus mercados. nu est ra G E N T E Los hombres y mujeres que laboran para nuestra institución, desde los más altos ejecutivos hasta los empleados que llevan a cabo las tareas más rutinarias, sienten un orgullo especial al servir a nuestra clientela con esmero y dedicación. Todos sienten la íntima satisfacción de pertenecer a la Gran Familia del Banco Popular, en la que se fomenta el cariño y la comprensión entre todos sus miembros, y en la que a la vez se cumple ﬁrmemente con las más estrictas reglas de conducta y de moral. J U N TA D E D I R E C TO R E S O F I C I A L E S E J E C U T I V O S RICHARD L. CARRIÓN RICHARD L. CARRIÓN Presidente de la Junta de Directores Presidente y Principal Oﬁcial Ejecutivo Popular, Inc. y Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Presidente de la Junta de Directores Presidente y Principal Oﬁcial Ejecutivo Popular, Inc. y Banco Popular de Puerto Rico ALEJANDRO M. BALLESTER JORGE A. JUNQUERA Presidente Ballester Hermanos, Inc. MARÍA LUISA FERRÉ Presidenta y Principal Oﬁcial Ejecutiva Grupo Ferré Rangel MICHAEL MASIN Inversionista Privado MANUEL MORALES, JR. Presidente Parkview Realty, Inc. FREDERIC V. SALERNO Inversionista Privado WILLIAM J. TEUBER, JR. Vicepresidente Ejecutivo EMC Corporation CARLOS A. UNANUE Presidente Goya de Puerto Rico, Inc. JOSÉ R. VIZCARRONDO Presidente y Principal Oﬁcial Ejecutivo Desarrollos Metropolitanos, S.E. Primer Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Principal Oﬁcial Financiero Grupo Corporativo de Finanzas Popular, Inc. CARLOS J. VÁZQUEZ Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Popular, Inc. Presidente Banco Popular North America LCDO. IGNACIO ÁLVAREZ Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Principal Oﬁcial Legal Grupo Legal y de Asuntos Corporativos Popular, Inc. JUAN GUERRERO Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Finanzas y Servicios de Seguros Banco Popular de Puerto Rico AMÍLCAR JORDÁN Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo Corporativo de Manejo de Riesgo Popular, Inc. LCDO. SAMUEL T. CÉSPEDES GILBERTO MONZÓN Estas palabras fueron escritas en 1988 por don Rafael Carrión, Jr., Presidente y Presidente de la Junta de Directores (1956-1991), con motivo del 95to aniversario de Banco Popular de Puerto Rico y son muestra del compromiso con nuestros empleados. Secretario de la Junta de Directores Popular, Inc. I N F O R M A C I Ó N C O R P O R A T I V A Firma Registrada de Contabilidad Pública Independiente: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Reunión Anual: La reunión anual del 2011 de accionistas de Popular, Inc. se celebrará el jueves, 28 de abril, a las 9:00 a.m. en el Ediﬁcio Centro Europa en San Juan, Puerto Rico. Información Adicional: El Informe Anual en el Formulario 10-K radicado con la Comisión de Valores e Intercambio e información ﬁnanciera adicional están disponibles visitando nuestra página de Internet: www.popular.com Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Crédito a Individuos Banco Popular de Puerto Rico EDUARDO J. NEGRÓN Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Administración Popular, Inc. NÉSTOR O. RIVERA Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Banca Individual y Operaciones Banco Popular de Puerto Rico ELI SEPÚLVEDA Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Crédito Comercial Popular, Inc. RICARDO TORO Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Banca Comercial Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Financial Review and Supplementary Information Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Statistical Summaries Financial Statements Management’s Report to Stockholders Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2 90 95 96 98 99 100 101 103 104 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 2 3 3 9 12 13 25 25 30 31 33 34 35 36 41 41 41 45 46 47 49 50 58 64 65 69 84 85 88 90 91 92 94 Forward-Looking Statements Overview Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction Subsequent Events Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates Statement of Operations Analysis Net Interest Income Provision for Loan Losses Non-Interest Income Operating Expenses Income Taxes Fourth Quarter Results Reportable Segment Results Discontinued Operations Statement of Condition Analysis Assets Deposits and Borrowings Stockholders’ Equity Regulatory Capital Risk Management Market / Liquidity Risk Liquidity Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality Enterprise Risk and Operational Risk Management Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Standards Glossary of Selected Financial Terms Statistical Summaries Statements of Condition Statements of Operations Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income Quarterly Financial Data 3 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information which management believes necessary for understanding the financial performance of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation” or “Popular”). All accompanying tables, consolidated financial statements and corresponding notes included in this “Financial Review and Supplementary Information - 2010 Annual Report” (“the report”) should be considered an integral part of this MD&A. involve and, by their nature, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The information included in this report contains certain forward- looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continues,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may,” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future certain risks, performance uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of which are beyond the Corporation’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions; changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) on the Corporation’s businesses, business practices and costs of operations; the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located; the performance of the stock and bond markets; competition in the financial services industry; additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments; and possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic conditions that adversely affect the the job market, consumer general economy, housing prices, confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; adverse movements and volatility in debt and equity capital markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations; changes rules and interpretations; increased competition; the Corporation’s ability to grow its core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change the business mix of the Corporation; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks. Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges and juries. in accounting standards, All forward-looking statements included in this report are based upon information available to the Corporation as of the date of this report, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, management assumes no obligation to update or revise any such forward- looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements. The description of the Corporation’s business and risk factors contained in Item 1 and 1A of its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information about the business of the Corporation and the material risk factors that, in addition to the other information in this report, readers should consider. OVERVIEW The Corporation is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the mainland United States, the Caribbean and Latin America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the mainland United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The Corporation has a 49% interest in transaction processing services EVERTEC, which provides throughout the Caribbean and Latin America. The Corporation’s net income amounted to $137.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with a net loss of $573.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a net loss of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of 2009 and 2008 included net losses of discontinued operations amounting to $20.0 million and $563.4 million, respectively. The discussions that follow pertain to Popular, Inc.’s continuing operations, unless otherwise indicated. The year 2010 was one of significant accomplishments for the Corporation. In the context of positioning the Corporation to participate in a potential FDIC-assisted transaction in Puerto Rico, the Corporation enhanced its capital position with an offering of equity whereby it raised $1.15 billion of new common equity capital. This capital raise, along with the after-tax gain of $531.0 million, net of transaction costs, on the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, substantially strengthened the Corporation’s capital ratios, placing it in a position to participate in the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking market and to pursue strategies to improve the credit quality of its loan portfolio, such as the reclassification to held-for-sale of high-risk portfolios. Capital raise During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation completed the issuance of $1.15 billion of capital through the sale and subsequent conversion of depositary shares representing interests in shares of contingent convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock into common stock. This transaction resulted in the issuance of over 383 million additional shares of common stock in May 2010. The net proceeds from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Acquisition of Westernbank in an FDIC-assisted transaction The closing by the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions, together with the FDIC, of three banks in Puerto Rico significantly altered the local banking landscape. On April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (herein the “Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction”). As a result of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation’s total assets as of April 30, 2010 increased by $8.3 billion, principally consisting of a loan portfolio with an estimated fair value of $5.2 billion ($8.6 billion unpaid principal balance prior to purchase accounting adjustments) and a $2.3 billion FDIC loss share indemnification asset. Liabilities with a fair value of approximately $8.3 billion were recognized at the acquisition date, including $2.4 billion of assumed deposits, a $5.8 billion five-year promissory note issued to the FDIC at a fixed annual interest rate of 2.50% and an equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC with an estimated fair value of $52.5 million as of April 30, 2010. The indemnification asset represents the portion of estimated losses covered by loss sharing agreements between BPPR and the FDIC. The loss sharing agreements afford the Corporation significant protection against 4 future losses in the acquired loan and other real estate portfolio. The Corporation recorded goodwill of $87 million as part of the transaction. Refer to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction section in this MD&A for additional information on the transaction. Sale of EVERTEC On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a in its processing and technology business majority interest EVERTEC, including the businesses transferred by BPPR to EVERTEC in an internal reorganization that is discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. Under the terms of the sale, an unrelated third party acquired a 51% interest in to a leveraged buy-out. The EVERTEC for cash pursuant Corporation retained the remaining 49% interest and EVERTEC’s operations in Venezuela and certain related contracts. The Corporation’s investment in EVERTEC is currently accounted for under the equity method and the investment amounted to $197 million at December 31, 2010, which is included in “other assets” in the consolidated statement of condition. As a result of the sale, the Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain, net of transaction costs, of approximately $616.2 million ($531.0 million after-tax), of which $640.8 million was separately disclosed within non-interest income and $24.6 million are included as operating expenses (transaction costs). In connection with the sale, Popular entered into various agreements including a master services agreement pursuant to which EVERTEC will continue providing various processing and information technology services to Popular, BPPR, and their respective subsidiaries. The net cash proceeds received by the Corporation after transaction costs and taxes were approximately $528.6 million, which further boosted the Corporation’s liquidity position. The sale had a positive impact of approximately 2.19% on Tier 1 Common, 2.31% on Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios, and of approximately 1.20% on Popular’s Tier 1 Leverage ratio. consolidated statement of operations in the Reclassification of loan portfolios for future sale Actions taken in 2010 to reduce credit risk included the reclassification in the fourth quarter of approximately $1.0 billion of loans held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale. A majority of these loans are expected to be sold in the first quarter of 2011, and consist of approximately $603 million (book value) of construction, commercial real estate and land loans in Puerto Rico and of $396 million (book value) U.S. non-conventional residential mortgage loans. This action resulted in $327 million of write- downs to the allowance for loan losses to mark the loans to estimated sales price, which also considered an additional charge to the provision for loan losses of $176 million. Disposing of these loans will substantially reduce non-performing assets, further reduce the Corporation’s exposure to future real estate losses and allows the Corporation to refocus the organization and redeploy resources to generate new business. The subsequent events section in this MD&A provides more details on the Corporation’s plans with respect to these potential sales. 5 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Financial Highlights Table A provides selected financial data for the past five years. Table A Selected Financial Data (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Year ended December 31, Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Operating expenses Income tax expense (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income (loss) Net (loss) income applicable to common stock PER COMMON SHARE DATA [1] Net (loss) income Basic and diluted: From continuing operations From discontinued operations Total Dividends declared Book Value Market Price Outstanding shares: Average - basic Average - diluted End of period AVERAGE BALANCES Net loans [2] Earning assets Total assets Deposits Borrowings Total stockholders’ equity PERIOD END BALANCES Net loans [2] Allowance for loan losses Earning assets Total assets Deposits Borrowings Total stockholders’ equity SELECTED RATIOS $1,948,246 653,381 $1,854,997 753,744 $2,274,123 994,919 $2,552,235 1,246,577 $2,455,239 1,200,508 1,294,865 1,011,880 1,288,193 1,325,547 108,230 137,401 – 1,101,253 1,405,807 896,501 1,154,196 (8,302) (553,947) (19,972) 1,279,204 991,384 829,974 1,336,728 461,534 (680,468) (563,435) $137,401 ($573,919) ($1,243,903) ($54,576) $97,377 ($1,279,200) 1,305,658 341,219 873,695 1,545,462 90,164 202,508 (267,001) ($64,493) ($76,406) 1,254,731 187,556 770,509 1,278,231 139,694 419,759 (62,083) $357,676 $345,763 ($0.06) – ($0.06) – $3.67 3.14 $0.29 (0.05) $0.24 $0.02 3.89 2.26 ($2.55) (2.00) ($4.55) $0.48 6.33 5.16 $0.68 (0.95) ($0.27) $0.64 12.12 10.60 $1.46 (0.22) $1.24 $0.64 12.32 17.95 885,154,040 885,154,040 1,022,727,802 408,229,498 408,229,498 639,540,105 281,079,201 281,079,201 282,004,713 279,494,150 279,494,150 280,029,215 278,468,552 278,703,924 278,741,547 $25,821,778 34,154,021 38,318,896 26,650,497 7,448,021 3,259,167 $26,458,855 793,225 33,507,582 38,722,962 26,762,200 6,946,955 3,800,531 $24,836,067 34,083,406 36,569,370 26,828,209 5,832,896 2,852,065 $23,803,909 1,261,204 32,340,967 34,736,325 25,924,894 5,288,748 2,538,817 $26,471,616 36,026,077 40,924,017 27,464,279 7,378,438 3,358,295 $26,268,931 882,807 36,146,389 38,882,769 27,550,205 6,943,305 3,268,364 $25,380,548 36,374,143 47,104,935 25,569,100 9,356,912 3,861,426 $29,911,002 548,832 40,901,854 44,411,437 28,334,478 11,560,596 3,581,882 $24,123,315 36,895,536 48,294,566 23,264,132 12,498,004 3,741,273 $32,736,939 522,232 43,660,568 47,403,987 24,438,331 18,533,816 3,620,306 Net interest margin (taxable equivalent basis) Return on average total assets Return on average common stockholders’ equity Tier I Capital to risk-adjusted assets Total Capital to risk-adjusted assets 3.82% 0.36 4.37 14.54 15.81 3.47% (1.57) (32.95) 9.81 11.13 3.81% (3.04) (44.47) 10.81 12.08 3.83% (0.14) (2.08) 10.12 11.38 3.72% 0.74 9.73 10.61 11.86 [1] Per share data is based on the average number of shares outstanding during the periods, except for the book value and market price which are based on the information at the end of the periods. [2] Includes loans held-for-sale and covered loans. As indicated earlier, the Corporation achieved net income of $137.4 million in 2010, compared with a net loss of $573.9 million in 2009. The net income for 2010 primarily reflects the after-tax gain of $531.0 million on the sale of the majority interest in EVERTEC. Table B presents a five-year summary of the components of net income (loss) as a percentage of average total assets. Table B Components of Net Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Average Total Assets 6 Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale Trading account profit FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business Other non-interest income Total net interest income and non-interest income, net of provision for loan losses Operating expenses Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax Income tax (expense) benefit Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income (loss) The discussion that results of operations follows provides highlights of for the ended Corporation’s December 31, 2010 compared to the results of operations of 2009. It also provides some highlights with respect to the Corporation’s financial condition, credit quality, capital and liquidity. the year k Higher net interest income by $193.6 million, principally derived from interest income on the Westernbank acquired loans. Also, continued reduction in the cost of funding deposits has helped offset the negative effect brought by the reduction in the Corporation’s loan balances; k Lower provision for loan losses by $393.9 million, principally driven by a decrease of $380.0 million in the provision for loan losses in the BPNA reportable segment, reserve which was principally as a result of loans, requirements construction loans, U.S. non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit; lower commercial during 2010 for k Higher non-interest income by $391.7 million, mainly from the gain on the EVERTEC sale, partially offset by lower gains on the sale of investment securities; k Higher operating expenses by $171.4 million, mostly due to prepayment penalties on the early extinguishment of debt of $38.8 million in 2010, compared with gains of $78.3 million in 2009; and 2010 3.38% (2.64) 0.01 (0.15) 0.04 (0.06) 0.11 1.67 1.74 4.10 (3.46) 0.64 (0.28) 0.36 – 0.36% Year Ended December 31, 2009 3.01% (3.84) 0.60 (0.10) 0.11 – – – 1.84 1.62 (3.16) (1.54) 0.02 (1.52) (0.05) (1.57%) 2008 3.13% (2.42) 0.17 0.01 0.11 – – – 1.74 2.74 (3.27) (0.53) (1.13) (1.66) (1.38) (3.04%) 2007 2.77% (0.72) 0.21 0.13 0.08 – – – 1.43 3.90 (3.28) 0.62 (0.19) 0.43 (0.57) (0.14%) 2006 2.60% (0.39) 0.04 0.16 0.08 – – – 1.32 3.81 (2.65) 1.16 (0.29) 0.87 (0.13) 0.74% k An unfavorable variance in income tax of $116.5 million, principally due to higher taxable income in the Puerto Rico operations, mostly related to capital gains on the sale of EVERTEC, and lower benefit on net tax exempt interest income. In late 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (“PFH”) by selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $20.0 million and $563.4 million, respectively. The results of PFH are presented as part of “Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax” in Table A. The discussions in this MD&A pertain to Popular, Inc.’s continuing operations, unless otherwise indicated. Refer to the Discontinued Operations section in this MD&A for additional financial information. Total assets at December 31, 2010 amounted to $38.7 billion, an increase of $4.0 billion, or 11%, compared with December 31, 2009. Total earning assets at December 31, 2010 increased by $1.2 billion, or 4%, compared with December 31, 2009. Total assets and total earning assets amounted to $38.9 billion and $36.1 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2008. The increase in total assets, when compared to December 31, 2009, was principally in loans held-in-portfolio by $1.9 billion, due to the loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, partially offset by reductions in the Corporation’s non-covered loan portfolio. Also, the increase in total assets was 7 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT offset by a decline in investment related to the $2.3 billion FDIC loss share indemnification asset, securities partially in the available-for-sale by $1.5 billion. The decline the Corporation’s loan portfolio, excluding the impact of covered loans acquired, was influenced by high levels of loan charge-offs and the impact of exiting origination channels at BPNA as part of the restructuring activities undertaken during 2009. Also, the decline in loan originations reflects low demand in a weak economic environment. The reduction in total assets from 2008 to 2009 was also influenced by running off portfolio, charge-offs and low demand. assets. Deposits financing to total Refer to Statement of Condition Analysis section of this MD&A for the percentage allocation of the composition of the Corporation’s totaled $26.8 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $25.9 billion at December 31, 2009 and $27.6 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits during 2010 was associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, partially offset by lower volume of brokered certificates of deposit and reductions due to the effect of closure, sale and consolidation of branches in the U.S. mainland operations, and the attrition impact due to the reduction in the pricing of deposits, funds amounted to $6.9 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $5.3 billion at December 31, 2009 and $6.9 billion at December 31, 2008. The from December 31, 2009 to the same date in 2010 was related to the note issued to the FDIC in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which had a carrying amount of $2.5 billion at impact of December 31, 2010, partially offset by the in borrowings Borrowed including deposits. increase internet deleveraging strategies. The reduction in borrowings from 2008 to 2009 was the result of a smaller asset base given the reduction in size of the BPNA’s operations, reduced loan levels in the Puerto Rico operations and sale of securities. For detailed information on lending and investing activities, refer to the Statement of Condition Analysis and the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality sections of this MD&A. A glossary of selected financial terms has been included at the end of this MD&A. Stockholders’ equity totaled $3.8 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $2.5 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in stockholders’ equity from the end of 2009 to December 31, 2010 was principally due to the capital raised from the common stock issuance. Stockholders’ equity amounted to $3.3 billion at December 31, 2008. The reduction in total stockholders’ equity from December 31, 2008 to 2009 was principally due to the net loss incurred in 2009. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation was well-capitalized under the regulatory framework. Refer to Table J of this report for information on capital adequacy data, including regulatory capital ratios. The shares of the Corporation’s common stock are traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“NASDAQ”) system under the symbol BPOP. Table C shows the Corporation’s common stock performance on a quarterly basis during the last five years, including market prices and cash dividends declared. Further discussions of operating results, financial condition and business risks are presented in the narrative and tables included herein. Table C Common Stock Performance 8 Market Price High Low Cash Dividends Declared Per Share Book Value Per Share Dividend Payout Ratio Dividend Yield [1] Price / Earnings Ratio Market / Book Ratio $3.67 N.M. N.M. N.M. 85.56% $3.14 2.95 4.02 2.91 $2.80 2.83 3.66 5.52 $8.61 11.17 13.06 14.07 $12.51 16.18 17.49 18.94 $19.66 20.12 21.98 21.20 $2.70 2.45 2.64 1.75 $2.12 1.04 2.19 1.47 $4.90 5.12 6.59 8.90 $8.65 11.38 15.82 15.82 $17.23 17.41 18.53 19.54 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 $0.08 0.08 0.16 0.16 $0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 $0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 3.89 N.M. 2.55% N.M. 58.10 6.33 N.M. 6.17 N.M. 81.52 12.12 N.M. 4.38 (39.26x) 87.46 12.32 51.02% 3.26 14.48 145.70 2010 4th quarter 3rd quarter 2nd quarter 1st quarter 2009 4th quarter 3rd quarter 2nd quarter 1st quarter 2008 4th quarter 3rd quarter 2nd quarter 1st quarter 2007 4th quarter 3rd quarter 2nd quarter 1st quarter 2006 4th quarter 3rd quarter 2nd quarter 1st quarter [1] Based on the average high and low market price for the four quarters. N.M. - Not meaningful. 9 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table provides a calculation of net income (loss) per common share (“EPS”) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands, except share information) Table - Net Income per Common Share Net income (loss) from continuing operations Net loss from discontinued operations Preferred stock dividends Deemed dividend on preferred stock [1] Preferred stock discount accretion Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A and B preferred stock for common stock, net of issuance costs Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred stock for trust preferred securities Net (loss) income applicable to common stock Average common shares outstanding Average potential dilutive common shares Average common shares outstanding- assuming dilution Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations Basic and diluted EPS 2010 2009 $137,401 – (310) (191,667) – – – ($54,576) ($553,947) (19,972) (39,857) – (4,515) 230,388 485,280 $97,377 885,154,040 – 408,229,498 – 885,154,040 408,229,498 ($0.06) – ($0.06) $0.29 (0.05) $0.24 [1] Deemed dividend related to the issuance of depositary shares and the conversion of the preferred stock into shares of common stock in the second quarter of 2010. The principal factor that has affected the Corporation’s capital resources and results of operations in recent periods is the deterioration of credit quality and its related impact on the allowance for loan losses and provision. The deterioration of credit quality has been the result of the recessionary environment both in Puerto Rico and the mainland United States and the associated reduction in real estate and housing values in both markets. In addition, during the last three years the Corporation has in exiting certain non- losses conventional mortgage related operations in the mainland United States. incurred substantial During 2010, the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico, its principal market, continued to experience a high level of charge- offs in the commercial and construction loan portfolios principally due to reductions in real estate collateral values. Credit management has remained a primary area of focus in the BPPR reportable segment, principally in the commercial and construction lending areas. The continuing recession in Puerto Rico makes loan growth a challenge. Given the challenging economic environment in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s credit metrics for its Puerto Rico operations will remain under pressure for 2011, particularly with respect to mortgage related assets. The Island’s economy remained sluggish during 2010 and job creation continues to be a challenge. The government administration has taken a pragmatic approach toward a turnaround, reducing the budget deficit by close to 60% through difficult yet necessary cost-cutting initiatives. In September 2010, the Puerto Rico government signed into law an aggressive housing incentive package, providing a much needed jolt to the residential housing market. The whole package is generous, targets primarily new homes but also benefits existing ones, and has a ten-month expiration period which encourages people to act promptly. The program reduces cash outlays at closing and grants significant tax exemptions, such as no capital gain tax in the future sale of an acquired new home, no tax on rental income for 10 years and no property taxes for 5 years on new homes. Following the enactment of this new law, the Corporation saw an increase in interest among potential buyers and in originations for the fourth quarter of 2010. In the U.S. mainland, management remains focused on managing legacy assets and improving the performance of BPNA’s core banking business. The credit performance of BPNA has improved, resulting in a reduction in the provision for loan losses for the year 2010. The U.S. operations have on the mainland followed the top line demonstrating progressive improvement. BPNA’s income has remained steady. Management is working on increasing BPNA’s customer base as it moves from being mainly a Hispanic-focused bank to a more broad-based community bank. general trends credit WESTERNBANK FDIC-ASSISTED TRANSACTION As indicated previously, on April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico. 10 The following table presents the fair values of major classes of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Corporation as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date. (In thousands) Assets: Cash and money market investments Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock Loans FDIC loss share indemnification asset Covered other real estate owned Core deposit intangible Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note issued to the FDIC) Other assets Total assets Book value prior to purchase accounting adjustments Fair value adjustments Additional consideration As recorded by Popular, Inc. on April 30, 2010 $358,132 58,610 8,554,744 – 125,947 – – 44,926 – – ($3,354,287) 2,337,748 (73,867) 24,415 – – $9,142,359 ($1,065,991) – – – – – – $111,101 – $111,101 $358,132 58,610 5,200,457 2,337,748 52,080 24,415 111,101 44,926 $8,187,469 Liabilities: Deposits Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium of $12,411 resulting from the fair value adjustment) Equity appreciation instrument Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments Accrued expenses and other liabilities Total liabilities Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed $2,380,170 – – – 13,925 $2,394,095 $6,748,264 $11,465 – – 45,755 – $57,220 – Aggregate fair value adjustments Aggregate additional consideration, net Goodwill on acquisition – – – ($1,123,211) – – – $2,391,635 $5,770,495 52,500 – – $5,822,995 – – $5,711,894 5,770,495 52,500 45,755 13,925 $8,274,310 – – – – $86,841 During the fourth quarter of 2010, retrospective adjustments were made to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction to reflect new information obtained during the measurement period (as defined by ASC Topic 805), about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the acquisition-date fair value measurements. The retrospective adjustments were mostly driven by refinements in credit loss assumptions because of new information that became available. The revisions principally resulted in a decrease in the estimated credit losses, thus increasing the fair value of acquired loans and reducing the FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition, as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available, and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease. 11 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table depicts the principal changes in fair value as previously reported in Form 10-Qs filed during 2010 and the revised amounts recorded during the measurement period with general explanations of the major changes. (In thousands) Assets: Loans Less: Discount Net loans FDIC loss share indemnification asset Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Note issued to the FDIC Equity appreciation instrument Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments Other liabilities Total liabilities April 30, 2010 As recasted [a] April 30, 2010 As previously reported [b] $8,554,744 (3,354,287) 5,200,457 2,337,748 86,841 649,264 $8,554,744 (4,293,756) 4,260,988 3,322,561 106,230 670,419 Change – $939,469 [c] 939,469 (984,813) [d] (19,389) (21,155) [e] $8,274,310 $8,360,198 ($85,888) $2,391,635 5,770,495 52,500 45,755 13,925 $8,274,310 $2,391,635 5,769,696 52,500 132,442 13,925 $8,360,198 – $799 [f] – (86,687) [g] – ($85,888) [a] Amounts reported include retrospective adjustments during the measurement period (ASC Topic 805) related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. [b] Amounts are presented as previously reported. [c] Represents the increase in management’s best estimate of fair value mainly driven by lower expected future credit losses on the acquired loan portfolio based on facts and circumstances existent as of the acquisition date but known to management during the measurement period. The main factors that influenced the revised estimated credit losses included review of collateral, revised appraised values, and review of borrower’s payment capacity in more thorough due diligence procedures. [d] This reduction is directly influenced by the reduction in estimated future credit losses as they are substantially covered by the FDIC under the 80% FDIC loss sharing agreements. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset decreased in a greater proportion than the reduction in the loan portfolio estimated future credit losses because of the true-up provision of the loss sharing agreement. As part of the agreement with the FDIC, the Corporation has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels as determined under the criteria stipulated in the agreements. The true-up payment represents an estimated liability of $169 million for the recasted estimates, compared with an estimated liability of $50 million in the original reported estimates. This estimated liability is accounted for as part of the indemnification asset. [e] Represents revisions to acquisition date estimated fair values of other real estate properties based on new appraisals obtained. [f] Represents an increase in the premium on the note issued to the FDIC, also influenced by the cash flow streams impacted by the revised loan payment estimates. [g] Reduction due to revised credit loss estimates and commitments. The following table summarizes the principal changes in the statement of operations as a result of the recasting for retrospective adjustments for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010. (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Non-interest income Operating expenses (Loss) income before income tax Income tax expense Net (loss) income As recasted 2nd Quarter 2010 $314,595 202,258 112,337 198,827 328,416 (17,252) 27,238 ($44,490) As previously reported 2nd Quarter 2010 $278,976 202,258 76,718 215,858 328,416 (35,840) 19,988 ($55,828) As recasted 3rd Quarter 2010 $356,778 215,013 141,765 825,894 371,541 596,118 102,032 As previously reported 3rd Quarter 2010 $386,918 215,013 171,905 796,524 371,547 596,882 102,388 $494,086 $494,494 Difference ($30,140) – (30,140) 29,370 (6) (764) (356) ($408) Difference $35,619 – 35,619 (17,031) – 18,588 7,250 $11,338 The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values may become available. The Corporation refers to the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except credit cards, as “covered loans” as the Corporation will be reimbursed by the FDIC for a substantial portion of any future losses on such loans under the terms of the loss sharing agreements. Foreclosed other real estate properties are also covered under the loss sharing agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to assets covered by such agreements (collectively, “covered assets”) begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. On a combined basis, the FDIC will reimburse BPPR for 80% of all qualifying losses with respect to the covered assets. BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of qualifying recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC reimbursed BPPR. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC to last for ten years, and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC to last for five years, with additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter. In June 2020, approximately ten years following the acquisition date, BPPR may be required to make a payment to the FDIC in the event that losses on covered assets under the loss sharing agreements have been less than originally estimated as determined pursuant the agreements that is described in Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. to a formula established under The FDIC has certain rights to withhold loss sharing payments if BPPR does not perform its obligations under the loss sharing agreements in accordance with their terms and to withdraw the loss share protection if certain significant transactions are effected without FDIC consent. Covered loans under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are reported in loans exclusive of the estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The covered loans acquired in the continue to be, Westernbank transaction are, reviewed for collectability. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies the section of Corporation’s accounting policy on acquired loans and related indemnification assets. this MD&A for / Estimates and will As part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received an equity appreciation instrument in which BPPR agreed to make a cash payment to the holder thereof equal to the product of (a) 50 million and (b) the amount by which the average volume weighted price of the Corporation’s common stock over the two NASDAQ trading days immediately prior to the date on which the equity appreciation instrument is exercised exceeds $3.43 (Popular, Inc.’s 20-day trailing average common stock price on April 27, 2010). The equity appreciation instrument is exercisable by the FDIC, in whole or in part, up to May 7, 2011. As of April 30, 2010, the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated at $52.5 million, compared with $9.9 million at December 31, 2010. The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as a liability and any subsequent changes in its estimated fair value are recognized 12 in earnings, adding volatility to the Corporation’s results of operations. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section and the Statement of Condition Analysis section of this MD&A, as well as Notes 2 and 3 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the accounting and additional information on the FDIC-assisted transaction. events that would require SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Management has evaluated the effects of subsequent events that have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2010. There are no recognition in the material ended year consolidated to December subsequent December in the consolidated financial statements are included in the section below. 2010. Events 2010 not for occurring statements elsewhere disclosed financial 31, 31, the that were reclassified as and land loans BPPR - Sale of Construction and Commercial Loans In January 2011, BPPR signed a non-binding letter of intent to sell approximately $500 million (book value) of construction and commercial real estate loans, approximately 75% of which are non-performing, to a newly created joint venture that will be majority owned by an unrelated third party for a purchase price equal to 47% of their unpaid principal balance at December 31, 2010. The loans are part of a portfolio of approximately $603 million (book value) of construction, commercial real estate loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2010. The unpaid principal balance of the loans does not reflect any charge-offs previously taken by the Corporation, which are reflected in their book value. As part of the transaction, BPPR will make a 24.9% equity investment in the venture. BPPR will also provide financing to the venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to 50% of the purchase price and certain closing costs. In addition, BPPR will provide financing to the venture to cover unfunded commitments related to certain construction projects (subject to customary conditions of construction draws) and to fund certain operating expenses of the venture. The transaction, which is subject to the completion of due diligence and the execution of definitive documentation, as well as customary closing conditions, is expected to close during the first quarter of 2011. The terms of the non-binding letter were used as a basis for pricing the loans on an aggregate basis upon reclassification to loans held-for-sale. BPNA - Sale of Non-Conventional Mortgage Loans On February 28, 2011, BPNA sold to an unrelated third party approximately $288 million (book value) of its approximately $396 million (book value) non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2010, for a purchase price of approximately $156 million, or 44% of their legal unpaid principal balance. BPNA is engaged in negotiations 13 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT to sell the remaining portion of this loan portfolio to the same unrelated third party. typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. New Tax Code in Puerto Rico On January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law a new Internal Revenue Code for Puerto Rico. The most significant impact on corporations of this new Code is the reduction in the marginal corporate income tax rate from 39% to 30%. As a result of this reduction in rate, the Corporation will recognize an additional tax expense of $103.3 million during the first quarter of 2011 and a corresponding reduction in its deferred tax assets, which had been recognized at the higher marginal corporate income tax rate. Under the new code, the Corporation has a one-time election to opt-out of the new reduced rate. This election must be made with the filing of the 2011 income tax return. Currently, the corporate income tax rate is 40.95% due to a temporary five percent surtax approved in March 2009 for years beginning on January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES followed by the The accounting and reporting policies Corporation and its subsidiaries conform with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with this section. Critical accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions, which involve significant judgment about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that involve a high degree of subjectivity. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those estimates. The following MD&A section is a summary of what management considers the Corporation’s critical accounting policies / estimates. Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments The Corporation measures fair value as required by ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”; which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage equity appreciation instrument. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring loans basis, held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments held-for-sale, servicing impaired rights loans such and the as The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows: k Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. k Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. the asset reflect financial of inputs k Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value measurement liability. or Unobservable the Corporation’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. The inputs are developed based on the best available the Corporation’s own data such as internally-developed models and discounted cash flow analyses. information, which might include The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use of unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing on those securities. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. In addition, it may be affected on other factors such as the type of instrument, the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities, credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use from diminished unobservable generally results inputs observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. The fair value measurements and disclosures guidance in ASC Subtopic 820-10 also addresses measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. Transactions or quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be determinative of fair value when transactions are not orderly and thus may require adjustments to estimate fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value. Price quotes based upon transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value and the weight given is based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not available to determine if price quotes are based upon orderly transactions, less weight should be given to the price quote relative to other transactions that are known to be orderly. The lack of liquidity is incorporated into the fair value measurement based on the type of asset measured and the valuation methodology used. An illiquid market is one in which little or no observable activity has occurred or one that lacks willing buyers or willing sellers. Discounted cash flow techniques incorporate forecasting of expected cash flows discounted at appropriate market discount rates which reflect the lack of liquidity in the market which a market participant would consider. Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Management believes that fair values are reasonable and consistent with the fair value measurement guidance based on the Corporation’s internal validation procedure and consistency of the processes followed, which include obtaining market quotes when possible or using valuation techniques that incorporate market-based inputs. Refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporation’s fair value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. At December 31, 2010, approximately $5.8 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market- based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value are classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage- and collateralized mortgage backed securities (“MBS”) 14 derivative (“CMOs”), obligations instruments. and U.S. Treasury securities are valued based on yields that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities are priced based on an active exchange market and on quoted prices for similar securities. Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions are valued based on trades, bid price or spread, two sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves, market data feeds, discount and capital rates and trustee reports. MBS and CMOs are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Refer to the Derivatives section below for a description of the valuation techniques used to value these derivative instruments. their valuation methodology The remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010 were classified as Level 3 since considered significant unobservable inputs. The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly Puerto Rico tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). GNMA tax exempt mortgage-backed securities are priced using a local demand price matrix prepared from local dealer quotes, and other local investments such as corporate securities and local mutual funds which are priced by local dealers. MSRs, on the other hand, are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model which considers servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Additionally, the Corporation reported $875 million of financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2010, all of which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy. Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $63 million at December 31, 2010, of which $34 million were Level 3 assets and $29 million were Level 2 assets. These assets consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these securities is based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing is non-binding local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities are classified as Level 3. During the year ended December 31, 2010, there were financial $197 million in transfers out of Level 3 for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These transfers resulted from exempt FNMA and GNMA mortgage- backed securities, which were transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 2, as a result of a change in valuation methodology from an internally-developed pricing matrix to pricing them based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option 15 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT adjusted spread. Pursuant to the Corporation’s policy, these transfers were recognized as of the reporting period. There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 1 during the year ended December 31, 2010. the end of Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities available-for-sale are obtained from third- party pricing services and are validated with alternate pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporation’s financial statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers. ratings, spreads Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, and credit transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument. If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the year ended December 31, 2010, none of the Corporation’s investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance. to established benchmarks service providers its Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of portfolio of investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees. Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation pricing review of market procedures changes, and methodology, assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions. securities available-for-sale At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s portfolio of trading amounted to and investment $5.8 billion and represented 96% of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At December 31, 2010, net unrealized gains on the trading and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $36 million and $185 million, the Corporation’s securities and available-for-sale are classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which are the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment, represent less than 1% of the Corporation’s total portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale. respectively. Fair values for most of investment trading Loans held-for-sale The fair value of loans held-for-sale is principally based on terms of a recent non-binding sale agreement, bids received from potential buyers, and according to secondary market prices. Fair value is determined on an aggregate basis according to loan type and terms. combination of loan level data Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”), which amounted to Mortgage servicing rights $167 million at December 31, 2010, do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon discounted net cash flows calculated and market from a assumptions. The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows (e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have lower. Other assumptions are, in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. been historically Derivatives Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option which reflect models incorporate the values and liabilities pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives held by the Corporation are classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative assets associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporation’s own credit risk, is determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation. The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation limits, employs procedures for credit approvals and credit monitors the counterparties’ credit condition, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During the year ended December 31, 2010, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net loss of $0.2 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $0.5 million resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $0.3 million from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk. Equity appreciation instrument The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC was estimated by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal variables in determining the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporation’s common stock, the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk- free rate. The equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2. The Corporation recognized non-interest income of $42.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 as a result of a decrease in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument. The carrying amount of the equity appreciation instrument, which is liability in the consolidated statement of condition, amounted to $10 million at December 31, 2010. recorded as other Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the take into collateral, which is derived from appraisals that consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. the housing markets and the Continued deterioration of 16 economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement. Other real estate owned For other real estate owned received in satisfaction of debt, the the collateral dependent valuation method is used for impairment determination since the expected realizable value is based upon the proceeds received from the liquidation of the property. The other real estate owned is classified as Level 3 and is reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses Interest on loans is accrued and recorded as interest income based upon the principal amount outstanding. interest the excess of Recognition of income on commercial in which such excess was in the case of collateral dependent impairment, and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past loans due. However, individually evaluated for the the collateral recorded investment over the fair value of is generally promptly (portion deemed as uncollectible) later than the quarter charged-off, but in any event not following the quarter first recognized. Recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is discontinued when 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portions on mortgage loans are charged-off at 180 days past due. Recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Closed-end consumer loans and leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open- end (revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when 180 days in arrears. Certain loans which would be treated as non-accrual loans pursuant to the foregoing policy are treated as accruing loans if they are considered well-secured and in the process of collection. Once a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the interest previously accrued and uncollected is charged against current earnings and thereafter income is recorded only to the extent of any interest collected. Loans designated as non-accruing are returned to an accrual status when the Corporation expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest. Special guidelines exist for troubled-debt restructurings. 17 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT One of the most critical and complex accounting estimates is associated with the determination of the allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this determination. The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. of similar segmentation During 2009, the Corporation enhanced the reserve assessment of homogeneous loans by establishing a more risk loans with granular characteristics, reducing the historical base loss periods employed, and strengthening the analysis pertaining to the environmental in the methodology was implemented as of June 30, 2009. The impact in the Corporation’s allowance and provision for loan losses as a result of each of the changes described above was a decrease of approximately $3.5 million. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors: considered. The change factors k Historical net loss rates (including losses from impaired loans) by loan type and by legal entity adjusted for recent net charge-off trends and environmental factors. The base net loss rates are based on the moving average of annualized net charge-offs computed over a 3-year historical loss window for commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for consumer loan portfolios. k Net charge-off trend factors are applied to adjust the base loss rates based on recent loss trends. In other words, the Corporation applies a trend factor when base losses are below more recent loss trends (last 6 months). The trend factor accounts for inherent imprecision and the “lagging perspective” in base loss rates. In addition, caps and floors for the trend factor mitigate excessive volatility in the adjustment. k Environmental credit factors, which include losses to differ from historical and macroeconomic indicators such as employment, price index and construction permits, were adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit loss experience. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental an increases or decreases adjustment that, as appropriate, the historical each group. factors provide updated perspective on Environmental credit conditions. Correlation and regression analyses are used to select and weight these indicators. For non-conventional mortgage loans, the allowance for loan losses is established to cover at least factors on each loan group as economic applied loss rate and to one year of projected losses which are inherent in these portfolios. According to the accounting guidance criteria for specific impairment of a loan, up to December 31, 2008, the Corporation defined as impaired loans those commercial and construction borrowers with outstanding debt of $250,000 or more and with interest and /or principal 90 days or more past due. Also, specific commercial and construction borrowers with outstanding debt of $500,000 and over were deemed impaired when, based on current information and events, management considered that it was probable that the debtor would be unable to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan the Corporation January 1, 2009, agreement. Effective continues it to apply the same definition except prospectively increased the threshold of outstanding debt to $1,000,000 for the identification of newly impaired loans. At December 31, 2008, 88% of the ASC Section 310-10-35 specific reserves were coming from cases of $1 million or higher. Cases $1 million or higher represented 81% of the loan balances under ASC Section 310-10-35 (SFAS 114).This decision allowed management to focus on those cases with a higher level of risk for the Corporation. Loans that were below the new threshold at the time the change was implemented but were classified as the change remained individually impaired at resolved. analyzed for Management is of the opinion that the enhancements in the general reserve methodology previously discussed adequately covers the credit risk on the impaired loans excluded from the specific reserve analysis as a result of changing the threshold for the identification of impaired loans. impairment until the time of case was that the An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, if the loan is collateral or the fair value of the collateral dependent. The fair value of is generally obtained from appraisals. the collateral risks in the loan portfolio. economic developments The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis following a systematic methodology in order to provide for known and inherent In developing its assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as customers, can affect industries management’s estimates are the years of historical data to include when estimating losses, the level of volatility of losses in a specific portfolio, changes in underwriting standards, impairment financial measurement, financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various standards among others. Changes or markets. Other loan in the specific that accounting affecting factors and markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected. The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports for loans that are considered impaired following a corporate reappraisal policy. This policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans) either annually, every two years or every three years depending on the total the exposure of the borrower. As a general procedure, Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired. The collateral dependent method is used for the impairment determination on commercial and construction loans since the expected realizable value of the loan is based upon the proceeds received from the liquidation of the collateral property. For commercial properties, the “as is” value or the “income approach” value is used depending on the financial condition of the subject borrower and/or the nature of the subject collateral. In most cases, impaired commercial loans do not have reliable or sustainable cash flow to use the discounted cash flow valuation method. On construction loans, “as developed” collateral values are used when the loan is originated since the assumption is that the cash flow of the property once leased or sold will provide sufficient funds to repay the loan. In the case of many impaired construction loans, the “as developed” collateral value is also used since completing the project reflects the best exit strategy in terms of potential loss reduction. In these cases, the costs to complete impairment as determination. As a general rule, the appraisal valuation used by the Corporation impaired construction loans is based on discounted value to a single purchaser, discounted sell out or “as is” depending on the condition and status of the project and the performance of the same. considered part the are of For mortgage loans that are modified with regard to payment terms, the discounted cash flow value method is used, as the impairment valuation is more appropriately calculated based on the ongoing cash flow from the individuals rather than the liquidation of the asset. With regard to performing loans, the Corporation will require an appraisal when there is a refinancing or modification of the loan (if the existing appraisal is older than 12 months). If there is no new money being disbursed as part of the restructuring or the loan is less than $250,000, the appraisal cannot be more than 3 years old. Also, appraisals can be requested at any time when events become known that might materially alter the value of the property. It is the Corporation’s policy to require updated appraisals for all commercial and construction impaired loans and OREO properties over $3 million at least annually. Cases between $1 million to $3 million are reappraised at least every 24 months. 18 For loans secured by residential real estate properties (mortgage loans) and following the requirements of the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a current assessment of value is made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding loan balance in excess of the estimated value of the property, less estimated cost to sell, is charged-off. For this purpose and for residential real estate properties, the Corporation requests independent broker price opinions of value of the collateral property periodically depending on the delinquency status of the loans. Although the accounting codification guidance for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous evaluated for are impairment (e.g., mortgage loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) be analyzed under its provisions. collectively loans that TDRs represent loans where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that the creditor would not otherwise consider. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. These concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a court. Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of judgment. Indicators that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties include, for example: (i) the debtor is currently in default on any of its debt; (ii) the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the debtor will continue to be a going concern; (iv) currently, the debtor has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; and (v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the current business capabilities, its entity- specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and absent the current modification, the debtor cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs are reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan should continue in non- accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after classified as TDR). Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance after classified) and the loan yields a market rate. and principal) forecasts that the debtor 19 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had not closed any restructuring involving the type of loan splitting discussed in the Policy Statement on Prudent Commercial Real Estate Workouts, although it may do so in the future. Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset Beginning in 2009, the Corporation accounts for its acquisitions under ASC Topic No. 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the shared-loss agreements with the FDIC. These fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows. The these initial valuation Because the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Corporation for losses related to the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction, an indemnification asset was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The loss share indemnification asset on the acquisition date reflects the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties. related of indemnification asset requires management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates about how the acquired loans will perform in the future using valuation methods, including third-party discounted cash flow analysis and independent appraisals. Factors that may significantly affect the initial valuation include, among others, market-based and industry data related to expected changes in interest rates, assumptions related to probability and severity of credit losses, estimated timing of credit losses including the timing of foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, expected prepayment rates, required or anticipated loan modifications, unfunded loan commitments, the specific terms and provisions of any loss share agreements, and specific industry and market conditions that may impact discount rates and independent third-party appraisals. loans and ASC 310-30 provides two specific criteria that need to be met in order for a loan to be within its scope: (1) credit deterioration on the loan from its inception until the acquisition date and (2) that it is probable that not all of the contractual cash flows will be collected on the loan. Once in the scope of ASC 310-30, it is explicit that the credit portion of the fair value discount on an acquired loan would not be accreted into income until the acquirer had assessed that it expected to receive more cash flows on the loan than initially anticipated. Acquired loans that meet the definition of nonaccrual status fall within the Corporation’s definition of impaired loans under ASC 310-30. It is possible that performing loans would not meet criteria number 1 above related to evidence of credit deterioration since the date of loan origination, and therefore not fall within the scope of ASC 310-30. Based on the fair value determined for the acquired portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the entity’s definition of non-accrual status also resulted in the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Given the significant discount related to credit the Westernbank acquired two in the the valuation of Corporation considered the performing loans (1) Accrete the entire fair value discount (including the credit portion) using the interest method over the life of the loan in accordance with ASC 310-20; or (2) analogize to ASC 310-30 and only accrete the portion of the fair value discount unrelated to credit. portfolio, for possible options Pursuant to an AICPA letter dated December 18, 2009, the AICPA summarized the SEC Staff’s view regarding the accounting in subsequent periods for discount accretion associated with loan receivables acquired in a business combination or asset purchase. Regarding the accounting for such loan receivables that, in the absence of further standard setting, the AICPA understands that the SEC Staff would not object to an accounting policy based on contractual cash flows (Option 1 - ASC 310-20 approach) or an accounting policy based on expected cash flows (Option 2 - ASC 310-30 approach). As such, the Corporation considered the two allowable options as follows: k Option 1 - Since the credit portion of the fair value discount is associated with an expectation of cash flows that an acquirer does not expect to receive over the life of the loan, it does not appear appropriate to accrete that portion over the life of the loan as doing so could eventually overstate the acquirer’s expected value of the loan and ultimately result in recognizing income (i.e. through the accretion of the yield) on a portion of the loan it does not expect to receive. Therefore, the Corporation does not believe this an appropriate method to apply. k Option 2 - The Corporation believes to ASC 310-30 is the more appropriate option to follow in accounting for the credit portion of the fair value discount. By doing so, the loan is only being accreted up to the value that the acquirer expected to receive at acquisition of the loan. analogizing Based on the above, the Corporation elected Option 2 — the ASC 310-30 approach to the outstanding balance for all the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction with the exception of revolving lines of credit with active privileges as of the acquisition date, which are explicitly scoped out by the ASC 310-30 accounting guidance. New “new” loan for accounting purposes advances / draws after the acquisition date under existing credit lines that did not have revolving privileges as of the acquisition date, particularly for construction loans, will effectively be and treated as a accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20, resulting in a hybrid accounting for the overall construction loan balance. Management used judgment in evaluating factors impacting expected cash flows and probable loss assumptions, including the quality of the loan portfolio, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions in Puerto Rico, quality of underwriting standards of the acquired institution, reductions in collateral real estate values, and material weaknesses disclosed by the acquired institution in its most recent Form 10-K, including matters related to credit quality review and appraisal report review. unpaid undiscounted At April 30, 2010, the acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30 by the Corporation totaled $4.9 billion which represented contractually-required principal and interest balances of $9.9 billion reduced by a discount of $5.0 billion resulting from acquisition date fair value adjustments. The non-accretable discount on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 amounted to $3.4 billion or approximately 68% of the total discount, thus indicating a significant amount of expected credit losses on the acquired portfolios. Pursuant to ASC 310-20-15-5, the Corporation aggregated loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction into pools with common risk characteristics for purposes of applying the recognition, measurement and disclosure provisions for this subtopic. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type, accruing status, amortization type, rate index and source type. Once the pools are defined, the Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset. interest type, rate Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non- accretable between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition the increases in cash flows over those expected at date, acquisition income recognized prospectively as an adjustment to accretable yield. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses. the difference represents difference interest date are as The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for pursuant to the guidance of 20 ASC Subtopic 310-20, represents the difference between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. This discount is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan if the loan is in accruing status. Any cash flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable with the assets should the assets be sold. The indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income prospectively consistent with the approach taken to recognize increases in cash flows on covered loans. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as of the acquisition date is accreted into income, a reversal of the corresponding indemnification asset is recorded as a reduction to non-interest income in order to reflect reciprocal accounting. Increases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that the allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized. Likewise, decreases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same periods that the adjustment to accretable yield on the related acquired loans is recognized. Over the life of the acquired loans that are accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on individual loans or on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics. The Corporation evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of operations and an allowance for loan losses in its consolidated statement of condition. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Corporation adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s or pool’s remaining life. Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent with the loss assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting incorporates into the fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of money, which is accreted back into income over the life of the shared loss agreements. The loss share indemnification asset will be reduced by the amount owed by the FDIC for incurred losses. A corresponding claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from the FDIC. 21 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT to acquisition on loans The evaluation of estimated cash flows expected to be collected subsequent accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 and inherent losses on loans to ASC Subtopic 310-20 require the accounted pursuant continued usage of key assumptions and estimates. Given the current economic environment, the Corporation must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows considering the impact of home price and property value changes, changing loss severities and prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows for ASC Subtopic 310-30 loans and decreases in the net realizable value of ASC Subtopic 310-20 loans will generally result in a charge to the provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. These estimates are particularly sensitive to changes in loan credit quality. The amount that the Corporation realizes on the covered loans and related indemnification assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. The Corporation’s losses on these assets may be mitigated to the extent covered under the specific terms and provisions of the loss share agreements. Refer to Notes 3 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions on the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction and loans acquired. Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and attributable to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the changes are enacted. The calculation of periodic income taxes is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments. The Corporation has recorded two accruals for income taxes: (1) the net estimated amount currently due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions, including any reserve for potential examination issues, and (2) a deferred income tax that represents the estimated impact of how the Corporation between temporary recognizes assets and liabilities under GAAP, and how such assets and liabilities are recognized under the tax code. these future tax Differences financial consequences In estimating taxes, position or its results of operations. the management assesses the relative merits and risks of in the actual outcome of the Corporation’s could impact differences appropriate taking consideration statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. transactions treatment tax of into A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The realization of deferred tax assets requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax including the future reversal of existing temporary asset, differences, reversing future taxable income exclusive of temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant negative evidence and has caused the Corporation to conclude that it will not be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded a full valuation allowance of approximately $1.3 billion on the deferred tax assets of the Corporation’s U.S. operations. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounting to $398 million. The Corporation has assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of the net deferred tax assets based on the weighting of all available evidence. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. This situation is mainly due to the performance of the construction loan portfolio, including the charges related to the future sale of the portfolio. Currently, a significant portion of this portfolio has been written-down to fair value based on a bid received. The Banking operations in Puerto Rico have a very strong earnings history, and the event causing this loss is not a continuing condition of the operations. Accordingly there is enough positive evidence to outweigh the negative evidence of the cumulative loss. Based on this evidence, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset will be realized. Management will reassess the realization of the deferred tax assets based on the the applicable accounting pronouncement each criteria of reporting period. Changes in the Corporation’s estimates can occur due to changes in tax rates, new business strategies, newly enacted 22 guidance, and resolution of issues with taxing authorities regarding previously taken tax positions. Such changes could affect the amount of accrued taxes. The current income tax payable for 2010 has been paid during the year in accordance with estimated tax payments rules. Any remaining payment will not have any significant impact on liquidity and capital resources. The valuation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns and future tax consequences represents management’s best estimate of those future events. Changes in management’s current estimates, due to impact on the unanticipated events, could have a material Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. profitability. The accounting deferred for tax law, In evaluating a tax position, The Corporation establishes tax liabilities or reduces tax assets for uncertain tax positions when, despite its assessment that its tax return positions are appropriate and supportable under local the Corporation believes it may not succeed in realizing the tax benefit of certain positions if challenged. the Corporation determines whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Corporation’s estimate of the ultimate tax liability contains assumptions based on past experiences, and judgments about potential actions by taxing jurisdictions as well as judgments about the likely outcome of issues that have been raised by taxing jurisdictions. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Corporation evaluates these uncertain tax positions each quarter and adjusts the related tax liabilities or assets in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit or the expiration of a statute of limitations. The Corporation believes the estimates and assumptions used to support its evaluation of uncertain tax positions are reasonable. Internal Revenue subject matter. During 2010, completed (“IRS”) The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, at December 31, 2010 amounted to $32 million. Refer to Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements for further the information on this U.S. an Service examination of the Corporation’s U.S. operations tax return for 2007. As a result of the examination, the Corporation reduced the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits by $14.3 million. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $12 million. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status litigation and legislative activity and the of examinations, addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. Although the outcome of the Corporation tax audits is uncertain, believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been provided for any adjustments that are expected to result from open years. From time to time, the Corporation is audited by various federal, state and local authorities regarding income tax matters. Although management believes its approach in determining the appropriate tax treatment is supportable and in accordance with the accounting standards, it is possible that the final tax authority will take a tax position that is different than the tax position reflected in the Corporation’s income tax provision and other tax reserves. As each audit is conducted, recorded in the adjustments, in the period determined. consolidated financial statement Such differences effect on the an adverse Corporation’s income tax provision or benefit, or other tax reserves, in the reporting period in which such determination is made and, consequently, on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial position and / or cash flows for such period. appropriately could have any, are if are life an indefinite useful Goodwill The Corporation’s goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the business climate, an adverse action by a competitive regulator, environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit. an unanticipated change in the test involves comparing the fair value of Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step of the goodwill impairment the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed. The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the the fair value measurements accounting requirements of 23 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions, thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under applicable accounting standards. At December 31, 2010, goodwill totaled $647 million. Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements provides an aggregation of goodwill by reportable segment and Corporate group. The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization during the third quarter of 2010 using July 31, 2010 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push- down accounting, as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination. In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the combination of methods, a Corporation generally uses including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in specific lines of business, and any particular in the individual reporting units. features The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include: k a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size; k a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; k the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity; k the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and k the market growth and new business assumptions. For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of judgment. growth assumptions For purposes of the discounted cash flows (“DCF”) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the financial projections presented to the valuation date) / Liability Management Committee Corporation’s Asset (“ALCO”). The included in these projections are based on management’s expectations for each reporting unit’s financial prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity (i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 8.42% to 23.24% for the 2010 analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return of a “risk-free” asset (10-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as equity risk premium, size premium and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made when necessary. For BPNA, the only reporting unit that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of Step 1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market multiples used included “price to book” and “price to tangible book”. Additionally, the Corporation determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on BPNA’s financial projections, but assigned no weight to it given that the current market approaches provide a more meaningful measure of fair value considering the reporting unit’s financial performance and current market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31), requiring the completion of Step 2. In the Corporation accordance with accounting standards, performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNA’s net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from BPNA’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $402 million at July 31, 2010, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in BPNA’s Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill. The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not to the fair value of the reporting unit as a going concern. The current negative performance of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan portfolio, which is consistent with the results of the Step 2 analysis. The fair value determined for BPNA’s loan portfolio in the July 31, 2010 annual test represented a discount of 23.6%, compared with 20.2% at December 31, 2009. The discount is mainly attributed to market participant’s expected rate of returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA. Refer to the Reportable Segments Results section of this MD&A, which provides highlights of BPNA’s reportable segment financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2010. BPNA’s provision for loan losses, as a stand-alone legal entity, which is impairment the reporting unit level used for the goodwill analysis, ended year to December 31, 2010, which represented 122% of BPNA legal entity’s net loss of $326 million for that period. The provision for loan losses included charges of $120 million to the provision for loan losses related to a reclassification to loans held-for-sale of approximately $396 million (book value) of non-conventional mortgage loans in December 2010. $397 million for amounted If the Step 1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a third- party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNA’s goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNA’s the July 31, 2010 valuation date. loan portfolios as of Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for conclusions and determined they were reasonable. For the BPPR reporting unit, had the average reporting unit estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies been approximately 16% lower, there would still be no requirement to perform a Step 2 analysis, thus there 24 would be no indication of impairment on the goodwill recorded in BPPR at July 31, 2010. For the BPNA reporting unit, had the estimated implied fair value of goodwill calculated in Step 2 been approximately 63% lower, there would still be no impairment of the goodwill recorded in BPNA at July 31, 2010. The goodwill balance of BPPR and BPNA, as legal entities, represented approximately 91% of the Corporation’s total goodwill balance as of the July 31, 2010 valuation date. Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2010 annual assessment were reasonable. The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporation’s market capitalization increase the risk of goodwill impairment in the future. Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. As indicated in this MD&A, the economic situation in the United States and Puerto Rico, including deterioration in the housing market and credit market, continued to negatively impact the financial results of the Corporation during 2010. As part of the monitoring process, management performed an assessment for BPNA at December 31, 2010 since this unit had failed the Step 1 test in the annual goodwill evaluation. The Corporation determined BPNA’s fair value utilizing the same valuation approaches (market and DCF) used in the annual goodwill impairment test. The determined fair value for BPNA at December 31, 2010 continued to be below its carrying amount under all valuation approaches. The fair value determination of BPNA’s assets and liabilities was updated at December 31, 2010 utilizing valuation methodologies consistent with the July 31, 2010 test. The results of the assessment at December 31, 2010 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying amount, resulting in no goodwill results obtained in the December 31, 2010 assessment were consistent with the results of the annual impairment test in that the reduction in the fair value of BPNA was mainly attributable to the reduced fair value of BPNA’s loan portfolio. The discount on BPNA’s loan portfolio was approximately 20% at December 31, 2010. impairment. The Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations The Corporation provides pension and restoration benefit plans for certain employees of various subsidiaries. The Corporation 25 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of BPPR. The non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans (“the Plans”) are frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals. of the and actual benefit practice experience and health care compensation increase The estimated benefit costs and obligations of the pension and postretirement benefit plans are impacted by the use of subjective assumptions, which can materially affect recorded amounts, including expected returns on plan assets, discount rates, rates of trend rates. Management applies judgment in the determination of these factors, which normally undergo evaluation against current industry the Corporation. The Corporation uses an independent actuarial firm for assistance in the determination of the pension and postretirement obligations. Detailed information on the plans and related valuation assumptions are included in Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements. The Corporation periodically reviews its assumption for the long-term expected return on pension plan assets. The Plans’ assets fair value at December 31, 2010 was $464.6 million. The expected return on plan assets is determined by considering various factors, including a total fund return estimate based on a weighted average of estimated returns for each asset class in the plan. Asset class returns are estimated using current and projected economic and market factors such as real rates of return, inflation, credit spreads, equity risk premiums and excess return expectations. costs and the review, As part of the Corporation’s independent consulting actuaries performed an analysis of expected returns based on the plan’s asset allocation at January 1, 2011. This analysis is reviewed by the Corporation and used as a tool to develop expected rates of return, together with other data. This forecast reflects the actuarial firm’s view of expected long-term rates of return for each significant asset class or economic indicator; for example, 8.3% for large / mid-cap stocks, 5.1% for long-term government/credit, 9.0% for small cap stocks and 2.1% inflation at January 1, 2011. A range of expected investment returns is developed, and this range relies both on forecasts and on broad-market historical benchmarks for expected returns, correlations, and volatilities for each asset class. As a consequence of recent reviews, the Corporation left unchanged its expected return on plan assets for year 2011 at 8.0%, similar to the expected rate assumed in 2010 and 2009. Since the expected return assumption is on a long-term basis, it is not materially impacted by the yearly fluctuations (either positive or negative) in the actual return on assets. However, if the actual return on assets performs below management’s expectations for a continued period of time, this could eventually result in the reduction of expected return on assets percentage assumption. the Pension expense for the Plans amounted to $13.9 million in 2010, which includes a settlement loss of $4.2 million in the Corporation’s U.S. retirement plan. The total pension expense included a credit of $32.5 million for the expected return on assets. Pension expense is sensitive to changes in the expected return on assets. For example, decreasing the expected rate of return for 2011 from 8.00% to 7.50% would increase the projected 2011 expense for the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retirement Plan, the Corporation’s largest plan, by approximately $2.8 million. could impact the Corporation’s The Corporation accounts for the underfunded status of its pension and postretirement benefit plans as a liability, with an offset, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The determination of the fair value of pension plan obligations involves judgment, and any changes in those consolidated estimates statement of financial condition. The valuation of pension plan obligations is discussed above. Management believes that the fair value estimates of the pension plan assets are reasonable given that the plan assets are managed, in the most part, by the fiduciary division of BPPR, which is subject to periodic audit verifications. Also, the composition of the plan assets, as disclosed in Note 28 of the consolidated financial statements, is primarily in equity and debt securities, which have readily determinable quoted market prices. The Corporation uses the Tower Watson RATE: Link (10/90) Model to discount the expected program cash flows of the plans as a guide in the selection of the discount rate. The Corporation decided to use a discount rate of 5.30% to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2010, compared with 5.90% at December 31, 2009. A 50 basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate of 5.30% as of the beginning of 2011 would increase the projected 2011 expense for the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retirement Plan by approximately $2.5 million. The change would not affect the minimum required contribution to the Plan. The Corporation also provides a postretirement health care benefit plan for certain employees of BPPR. This plan was unfunded (no assets were held by the plan) at December 31, 2010. The Corporation had an accrual for postretirement benefit costs of $164 million at December 31, 2010. Assumed health care trend rates may have significant effects on the amounts reported for the health care plan. Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements provides information on the assumed rates considered by the Corporation and on the sensitivity that a one-percentage point change in the assumed rate may have on specified cost components and postretirement benefit obligation of the Corporation. STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Net Interest Income Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the year ended December 31, 2010 resulted in an increase of $123.0 million when compared with the same period in 2009. This source of earnings is subject to volatility derived from several risk factors which include market driven events as well as strategic decisions made by the Corporation’s management. adjustments were made to BPPR’s net interest income since its current tax is the marginal tax rate. 26 by and certain entities, obligations Tax-exempt interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain investments in obligations of U.S. Government the sponsored of and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies instrumentalities. Corporation’s the held Assets international banking entities, which previously were tax exempt under Puerto Rico law, are subject to a temporary 5% income tax rate. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates at each quarter, in the subsidiaries that have the benefit. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico tax law. Under this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of taxable income. BPPR’s tax position changed during 2010 and the benefit previously obtained from exempt therefore, no investments for now, not applicable; is, Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums / discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for the period ended December 31, 2010 included a favorable impact, excluding the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30, of $19.1 million, related to those items, compared to a favorable impact of $21.7 million for the same period in 2009 and $17.4 million in 2008. The discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and 310-30, $79.8 million and $207.0 million, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2010. below, was described as 27 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table D presents the different components of the Corporation’s net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared with the same period in 2009, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Table D Net Interest Income — Taxable Equivalent Basis (Dollars in millions) Average Volume 2009 2010 Variance Year ended December 31, Average Yield / Costs 2010 2009 Variance $1,539 6,300 493 $1,183 7,449 $356 (1,149) 0.35% 0.72% (0.37%) Money market investments 3.79 Investment securities (0.83) 4.62 615 (122) 6.55 6.63 (0.08) Trading securities (In thousands) Interest 2009 Variance Variance Attributable to Rate Volume $8,573 344,465 40,771 ($3,189) (105,811) ($2,789) (54,047) ($400) (51,764) (8,438) (494) (7,944) 2010 $5,384 238,654 32,333 8,332 9,247 (915) 3.32 4.26 (0.94) 276,371 393,809 (117,438) (57,330) (60,108) 13,347 15,230 (1,883) 629 4,627 3,854 768 4,494 4,344 4.82 8.77 6.02 (139) 133 (490) 10.40 4.94 8.42 6.49 9.94 (0.12) 0.35 (0.47) 0.46 Loans: Commercial and construction Leasing Mortgage Consumer 643,726 55,144 278,339 400,662 752,717 (108,991) (27,815) (81,176) 64,697 291,792 431,712 (9,553) (13,453) 2,568 (21,953) (31,050) 10,133 (12,121) 8,500 (41,183) 22,457 24,836 (2,379) 6.14 6.20 (0.06) Sub-total loans 1,377,871 1,540,918 (163,047) (37,067) (125,980) 3,365 – 3,365 9.01 – 6.51 6.20 9.01 0.31 Covered loans Total loans 303,096 – 303,096 – 303,096 1,680,967 1,540,918 140,049 (37,067) 177,116 5.73% 5.68% 0.05% Total earning assets $1,957,338 $1,934,727 $22,611 ($94,397) $117,008 25,822 24,836 $34,154 $34,083 986 $71 $4,981 $4,804 5,970 5,538 $177 432 10,967 12,193 (1,226) 0.80% 1.12% (0.32%) NOW and money market* Interest bearing deposits: 0.90 2.34 0.97 3.23 (0.07) (0.89) Savings Time deposits $39,776 54,021 257,084 $53,695 ($13,919) ($15,266) $1,347 53,660 361 (3,724) 4,085 393,907 (136,823) (96,845) (39,978) 21,918 22,535 (617) 1.60 2.22 (0.62) 350,881 501,262 (150,381) (115,835) (34,546) 2,401 5,047 2,888 2,945 (487) 2,102 2.51 4.80 2.40 6.22 0.11 Short-term borrowings (1.42) Medium and long-term debt 60,278 242,222 69,357 (9,079) 3,134 (12,213) 183,125 59,097 46,138 12,959 29,366 28,368 998 2.22 2.66 (0.44) Total interest bearing liabilities 653,381 753,744 (100,363) (66,563) (33,800) 4,732 56 4,293 1,422 439 (1,366) Non-interest bearing demand deposits Other sources of funds $34,154 $34,083 $71 1.91% 2.21% (0.30%) 3.82% 3.47% 0.35% Net interest margin Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis 1,303,957 1,180,983 122,974 ($27,834) $150,808 3.51% 3.02% 0.49% Net interest spread Taxable equivalent adjustment 9,092 79,730 (70,638) Net interest income $1,294,865 $1,101,253 $193,612 Notes: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category. * Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico. The increase in net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the same period in 2009, was driven mostly by: k The discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $207.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Also, there was $79.8 million discount accretion on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics. This impact is included in the line item “Covered loans” in Table D. 28 k a decrease in deposit costs associated to both a low interest rate scenario and management actions to reduce deposits costs, principally in certificates of deposit and money market accounts, as well as lower costs on brokered certificates of deposit; and k higher yield in consumer loans mainly reflected in the credit cards portfolio, in part due to revisions made to the spread charged over the prime rate for different risk categories and the impact of credit cards acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction not covered under the loss sharing agreement. The above variances were partially offset by the following factors which affected negatively the Corporation’s net interest margin: loan portfolio shows a decrease due to the slowdown in the auto and consumer loan origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off of E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) and closed-end second mortgages. On the positive side, the covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, that contributed $3.4 billion in average loan volume for the year 2010, net of fair value adjustments, mitigated the decrease in the volume of earning assets. The covered loans, which are segregated in Table D, contributed $303.1 million to the Corporation’s Investment securities decreased in average volume as a result of maturities and prepayments of mortgage-related investment securities, which funds were not reinvested due in part to deleveraging strategies, and to the sale of certain investment securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. income during 2010. interest k the excess liquidity from the capital issuance was temporarily invested in money market investments with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York earning a very low interest rate, which reduced the yield on earning assets; k the FDIC loss share indemnification asset of $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010, which is a non-interest earning asset that is being funded mainly through the FDIC note at a 2.50% annual rate. The accretion or amortization of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recorded in non-interest income; fixed interest k the conversion of $935 million of Series C preferred stock to trust preferred securities in August 2009 contributed to an increase of $45.2 million in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, when compared with the same period in 2009 (these payments were characterized as dividends prior to the exchange); and k higher balance of non-performing loans across the different loan categories, which is discussed in the Credit Risk and Loan Quality section of this MD&A, also challenged the margin. Also affecting net interest income was the increase in the volume of medium and long-term debt, particularly the note payable issued to the FDIC in April 2010. Despite the deposits acquired on the FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation’s deposit volume has declined, mainly in time deposits, including brokered certificates of deposit, due to deleveraging in the U.S. mainland operations, which was driven by a reduction in the earning assets funded by such deposits. Management is actively monitoring the impact the rate reductions could have on the Corporation’s liquidity. The average key index rates for the years 2008 through 2010 were as follows: Table - Key Index Rates Prime rate Fed funds rate 3-month LIBOR 3-month Treasury Bill 10-year Treasury FNMA 30-year 2010 2009 2008 3.25% 3.25% 5.08% 0.17 0.18 0.69 0.34 0.14 0.13 3.24 3.19 4.68 3.95 2.08 2.93 1.45 3.64 5.79 acquired in the FDIC-assisted loans the Excluding transaction, most loan categories decreased in volume, especially commercial and construction loan portfolios, due to lower origination activity and loan charge-offs. The consumer The decrease in the taxable equivalent adjustment for the year 2010, compared with the previous year, relates to the fact that there were no benefits associated to BPPR’s tax-exempt assets during 2010 as explained above. 29 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table E presents the different components of the Corporation’s net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared with the same period in 2008. Table E Net Interest Income - Taxable Equivalent Basis (Dollars in millions) Average Volume 2008 2009 Variance Year ended December 31, Average Yield / Costs 2009 2008 Variance $483 0.72% 2.68% (1.96%) Money market investments $1,183 7,449 615 9,247 $700 8,189 665 9,554 (740) 4.62 (50) 6.63 (307) 4.26 15,230 15,775 (545) 4.94 768 4,494 4,344 1,114 4,722 4,861 (346) 8.42 (228) 6.49 (517) 9.94 5.03 7.21 5.01 6.13 8.01 7.18 10.15 Investment securities (0.41) (0.58) Trading securities (0.75) (1.19) 0.41 (0.69) (0.21) Loans: Commercial and construction Leasing Mortgage Consumer (In thousands) Interest 2008 Variance Attributable to Variance Rate Volume $18,790 ($10,217) ($11,220) $1,003 412,165 47,909 (67,700) (7,138) (12,117) (3,669) (55,583) (3,469) 2009 $8,573 344,465 40,771 393,809 478,864 (85,055) (27,006) (58,049) 752,717 64,697 291,792 431,712 967,019 (214,302) (181,524) 89,155 339,019 493,593 (24,458) (47,227) (61,881) 4,439 (31,376) (17,932) (32,778) (28,897) (15,851) (43,949) 24,836 26,472 (1,636) 6.20 7.14 (0.94) Sub-total loans 1,540,918 1,888,786 (347,868) (226,393) (121,475) – – – – – – Covered loans – – – – – 24,836 26,472 (1,636) 6.20 7.14 (0.94) Total loans 1,540,918 1,888,786 (347,868) (226,393) (121,475) $34,083 $36,026 ($1,943) 5.68% 6.57% (0.89%) Total earning assets $1,934,727 $2,367,650 ($432,923) ($253,399) ($179,524) $4,804 5,538 12,193 $4,948 5,600 12,796 (62) 0.97 (603) 3.23 22,535 23,344 (809) 2.22 2,888 2,945 5,115 2,263 (2,227) 2.40 6.22 682 28,368 30,722 (2,354) 2.66 4,293 1,422 4,120 1,184 173 238 1.50 4.08 3.00 3.29 5.60 3.24 ($144) 1.12% 1.89% (0.77%) NOW and money market* Interest bearing deposits: Savings Time deposits (0.53) (0.85) (0.78) $53,695 53,660 393,907 $93,523 ($39,828) ($36,579) 84,206 522,394 (30,546) (128,487) (28,412) (110,675) ($3,249) (2,134) (17,812) 501,262 700,123 (198,861) (175,666) (23,195) Short-term borrowings (0.89) 0.62 Medium and long-term debt 69,357 183,125 168,070 126,726 (98,713) 56,399 (53,763) 15,131 (44,950) 41,268 (0.58) Total interest bearing liabilities 753,744 994,919 (241,175) (214,298) (26,877) Non-interest bearing demand deposits Other sources of funds $34,083 $36,026 ($1,943) 2.21% 2.76% (0.55%) 3.47% 3.81% (0.34%) Net interest margin Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis 1,180,983 1,372,731 (191,748) ($39,101) ($152,647) 3.02% 3.33% (0.31%) Net interest spread Taxable equivalent adjustment 79,730 93,527 (13,797) Net interest income $1,101,253 $1,279,204 ($177,951) Notes: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category. * Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico. Net interest margin in 2009 showed a decrease as compared to 2008 due to: k low interest rate environment that negatively impacted the yield and origination of most loan categories; k a higher balance of non-performing loans across the different loan categories; k liquidity strategies maintained throughout 2009 which generated a higher balance of short-term investments at lower rates; k during the latter part of the third quarter the Corporation exchanged $935 million of Series C preferred stock for junior subordinated debenture securities. The junior fair value, subordinated debentures were recorded at generating a discount. The impact of both the contractual interest payments and the discount accretion generated interest expense of $23.5 million for 2009. additional the payments to holders of Prior to the conversion, Series C preferred stock were accounted for as dividends. The negative effect of this additional interest expense was partially offset by the conversion of trust preferred into common stock, which resulted in a securities reduction in interest expense for 2009 of $11.9 million, compared with 2008; and k rating downgrades that occurred during 2009 contributed to the increase in the average cost of $350 million of unsecured by approximately $6.6 million during 2009. the Corporation senior notes of A lower cost of short term borrowing and interest bearing deposits during 2009 as compared to 2008 positively affected the Corporation’s net interest margin. respectively, Provision for Loan Losses The provision for loan losses totaled $1.0 billion, or 88% of net charge-offs, for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $1.4 billion, or 137%, for 2009, and $991.4 million, or 165%, respectively, for 2008. The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010 considers the effect of a $176.0 million charge to provide for the difference between the book value and the estimated fair value of the portfolios transferred to loans held-for-sale. Excluding the $176.0 million increase in provision related to these the provision for loan losses declined by reclassifications, $570 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the year ended December 31, 2009. The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010, when compared with the previous year, reflects higher net charge-offs by $125.2 million, mainly in commercial loans by $175.0 million and construction loans by $85.1 million. Partially offsetting this negative variance were lower net charge-offs in loans by $102.0 million, mortgage loans by consumer $25.8 million, and lease financing by $7.1 million. During the the Corporation recorded year ended December 31, 2010, 30 for impairment, loan losses loans for $605.4 million in provision for individually compared with evaluated $566.0 million for 2009. The increases in the commercial and construction loans net charge-offs were primarily attributed to the Corporation’s decision to promptly charge-off previously reserved impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland. The decreases in the consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs were mostly related to the favorable credit trends experienced by the Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations, particularly in the home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages, and the non-conventional mortgage business. As indicated previously, the covered loans were recognized at fair value upon acquisition. Based on management’s analysis, there was no need to establish an allowance for the covered loans from the acquisition date to December 31, 2010, thus this loan portfolio did not influence the variance in provision for loan losses. for reserve commercial requirements The increase in the provision for loan losses for 2009, compared with 2008, was principally the result of higher loans, general construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for loans considered impaired. The continued recessionary conditions of the Puerto Rico and the United States economies, housing value declines, a slowdown in in the global financial consumer spending and the turmoil markets and commercial impacted increasing charge-offs, non- construction loan portfolios; performing classified as assets impaired. The stress consumers experienced from depreciating home prices, rising unemployment and tighter credit conditions resulted in higher levels of delinquencies and losses in the Corporation’s mortgage and consumer loan portfolios. the Corporation’s judgmentally and loans Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section for a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non- performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics. 31 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Non-Interest Income Refer to Table F for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the past five years. Non-interest income accounted for 50% of total revenues in 2010, while it represented 45% of total revenues in the year 2009 and 39% in 2008. Table F Non-Interest Income (In thousands) Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Services charges on deposit accounts $195,803 $213,493 $206,957 $196,072 $190,079 Other service fees: Debit card fees Credit card fees and discounts Insurance fees Processing fees Sale and administration of investment products Mortgage servicing fees, net of amortization and fair value adjustments Trust fees Check cashing fees Other fees Total other services fees Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Trading account profit (Loss) gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business Other operating income 100,639 84,786 49,768 45,055 37,783 24,801 14,217 408 20,047 377,504 3,992 16,404 (56,139) (25,751) 42,555 640,802 93,023 110,040 94,636 50,132 55,005 34,134 15,086 12,455 588 22,111 394,187 219,546 39,740 (35,060) – – – 64,595 108,274 107,713 50,417 51,731 34,373 25,987 12,099 512 25,057 416,163 69,716 43,645 6,018 – – – 87,475 76,573 102,176 53,097 47,476 30,453 17,981 11,157 387 26,311 365,611 100,869 37,197 60,046 – – – 113,900 61,643 89,827 52,045 44,050 27,873 5,215 9,316 737 27,153 317,859 22,120 36,258 76,337 – – – 127,856 Total non-interest income $1,288,193 $896,501 $829,974 $873,695 $770,509 Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the previous year, increased by $391.7 million, or 44%, principally due to the gain of $640.8 million, before tax and transaction costs, recognized on the sale of the 51% ownership interest in the Corporation’s processing and technology business, EVERTEC. In addition, there were $42.6 million in favorable changes in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC during the year ended December 31, 2010 due to a reduction in the assumption of volatility related to the Corporation’s stock price and a shorter period remaining for the expiration of the instrument. Also, other operating income increased by $28.4 million due mainly to the $39.4 million accretion of the fair value of unfunded loan commitments that had been recorded as part of the FDIC-assisted transaction (which is offset by approximately 80% of this balance recorded in the category of FDIC loss share expense within non-interest income) and lower net derivative losses, including lower unfavorable credit adjustments by $8.2 million; partially offset by losses of $14.8 million from the in EVERTEC, which represented $574 thousand of the share of EVERTEC’s net the period from October 1, 2010 through income for ownership retained interest December 31, 2010, offset by the 49% of intercompany income eliminations of $15.4 million. This elimination mostly represents 49% of the costs that the Corporation records in the professional fees category within operating expenses and that EVERTEC has recognized as part of its net income, and must be eliminated as it represents a transaction with an affiliate. The above favorable variances in non-interest income were partially offset by the unfavorable variances discussed in the paragraphs below. There were lower net gains on sales of investment securities, net of valuation adjustments of investment securities, in 2010 by $215.6 million, compared with 2009, as shown in the table below: Table - Non-Interest Income - Investment Securities (In thousands) Net gain on sale of investment securities Valuation adjustments of investment securities Other Total Year ended December 31, 2010 Variance 2009 $3,762 $236,638 ($232,876) (264) 494 $3,992 (17,092) – $219,546 16,828 494 ($215,554) During the year ended December 31, 2010, there were $3.8 million in gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities, compared to $236.6 million in gains on the sale of investment securities during 2009, mostly related to the sale of $3.4 billion in U.S. Treasury notes and U.S. agency obligations by BPPR and the sale of equity securities by the BPPR and EVERTEC reportable segments. The valuation adjustments recorded during 2010 were related to write-downs on equity securities available-for-sale, while the valuation adjustments recorded during 2009 were also securities available-for-sale and to tax credit investments classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statement of condition. to write-downs related equity on for reciprocal accounting Also, there were $25.8 million in losses in the caption of FDIC loss share expense for the year ended December 31, 2010. These losses resulted from a reduction in the indemnification asset by $95.4 million resulting principally from the Corporation’s application of covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and the accounting for the unfunded commitments recorded at fair value on acquisition date. The Corporation was required to reduce the indemnification asset by approximately 80% of the loan discount accreted, and thus record a reduction in non-interest income. The above decrease in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset was partially offset by accretion of the indemnification asset, which amounted to $69.6 million for the period from April 30, 2010 through December 31, 2010. The decrease in trading account profit by $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, when compared with the same period of the previous year, was mostly in the Puerto Rico mortgage banking subsidiary and was mainly related to $51.1 million in lower realized gains as a result of a lower volume of mortgage-backed securities sold, partially offset by $23.2 million in higher unrealized gains of outstanding mortgage-backed securities. 32 There were higher losses on sales of loans, net of lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale, by $21.1 million, as detailed in the table below: Table - Non-Interest Income - Loans (In thousands) Gain on sales of loans Adjustments to indemnity reserves related to credit recourse or representation and warranties Adjustments related to repurchases of loans as servicers, but without credit recourse Other Lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale Total Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 Variance $18,460 $8,856 $9,604 (72,013) (40,211) (31,802) (1,919) (214) – – (1,919) (214) (453) ($56,139) (3,705) ($35,060) 3,252 ($21,079) For the year ended December 31, 2010, there were higher adjustments to the indemnity reserve of $31.8 million compared to 2009, mainly in the BPPR reportable segment by $54.0 million resulting from loans sold with recourse and to settlements on certain representation and warranty arrangements by E-LOAN. Partially offsetting the higher adjustment to the indemnity reserves, were lower unfavorable fair value adjustments on loans-held-for-sale of $6.1 million recorded by the Corporation’s mortgage banking business related to residential mortgage loans securitized and whole loan sales, and higher gains by $3.6 million on sales of commercial loans and leases in the BPNA reportable segment. $3.3 million, higher gains by In addition, service charges on deposit accounts for the year ended December 31, 2010 decreased by $17.7 million, when compared with the same period in 2009, mostly in the BPNA reportable segment related to lower non-sufficient funds fees and the impact of reduced fees from money services clients, Regulation E, and due to fewer customer accounts resulting from the reduction in BPNA’s branches. For the year ended December 31, 2009, non-interest income increased by $66.5 million, or 8%, when compared to 2008, mostly as a result of higher gains on sales of investment securities, net of valuation adjustments of investment securities. Net gains on sales of investment securities realized during 2009 included $182.7 million derived from the sale of $3.4 billion in U.S. Treasury notes and U.S. agency obligations during the first quarter of 2009 by BPPR and $52.3 million in gains from the sale of equity securities during 2009 by the BPPR and EVERTEC reportable segments, compared to approximately $49.3 million in gains related to the redemption of equity securities held by the Corporation during the first quarter of 2008 and $28.3 million in gains realized from the sale of $2.4 billion in U.S. agency securities during the second 33 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT including quarter of 2008 by BPPR. The fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale were lower by $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with the same period in 2008, mostly as a result of a $16.1 million adjustment recorded by Popular Equipment Finance in December 2008 on certain loans reclassified to held-for-sale, which were sold in early 2009. These favorable variances were partially offset by losses on sales of to indemnity reserves, of loans, $31.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 mainly in the BPNA reportable segment and PFH which was adjusted by $40.2 million. Additionally, there were lower other service fees by $22.0 million resulting from a decrease in credit card fees by $13.1 million associated with reduced late payment fees as a result of lower volume of credit cards subject to the fee and a lower average rate charged per transaction, and to reduced merchant fees because of lower volume of purchases; and lower fair value adjustments, by mortgage servicing fees, net of adjustments offset servicing by higher $10.9 million due to higher unfavorable fair value adjustments due to the impact of a higher discount rate, an increase in delinquencies, and foreclosure costs, and other economic fees. assumptions, partially Moreover, there was a decline in other operating income by $22.9 million due to lower gains on the sale of real estate properties by $20.5 million, principally because of a $21.1 million gain realized by BPNA in the third quarter of 2008 on the sale of a commercial building located in New York City and the sale of six retail bank branches of BPNA in Texas during the first quarter of 2008 with a realized gain of $12.8 million; including unfavorable credit adjustments, by $11.3 million; partially offset by lower write-downs on certain investments accounted under the equity method that are held by the Corporate group by $35.8 million. and higher derivative losses, Operating Expenses Refer to Table G for the detail of operating expenses by major categories along with various related ratios for the last five years. Table G Operating Expenses (Dollars in thousands) Salaries Pension and other benefits Total personnel costs Net occupancy expenses Equipment expenses Other taxes Professional fees Communications Business promotion Printing and supplies Impairment losses on long-lived assets FDIC Deposit Insurance Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses: Credit card processing, volume and interchange expenses Transportation and travel OREO expenses All other Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Subtotal Total Personnel costs to average assets Operating expenses to average assets Employees (full-time equivalent) Average assets per employee (in millions) Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 $412,057 102,141 $410,616 122,647 $485,720 122,745 $485,178 135,582 $458,977 132,998 514,198 116,203 85,851 50,608 166,105 38,905 46,671 9,302 – 67,644 38,787 38,184 7,769 46,768 89,379 – 9,173 533,263 111,035 101,530 52,605 111,287 46,264 38,872 11,093 1,545 76,796 (78,300) 41,799 8,796 25,800 62,329 – 9,482 608,465 120,456 111,478 52,799 121,145 51,386 62,731 14,450 13,491 15,037 – 43,326 12,751 12,158 73,066 12,480 11,509 811,349 620,933 728,263 620,760 109,344 117,082 48,489 119,523 58,092 109,909 15,603 10,478 2,858 – 39,811 14,239 2,905 54,174 211,750 10,445 924,702 591,975 99,599 120,445 43,313 117,502 56,932 118,682 15,040 – 2,843 – 30,141 13,600 994 55,144 – 12,021 686,256 $1,325,547 $1,154,196 $1,336,728 $1,545,462 $1,278,231 1.34% 3.46 8,277 $4.63 1.46% 3.16 9,407 $3.89 1.54% 3.39 10,387 $3.80 1.57% 3.92 11,374 $3.47 1.49% 3.21 11,025 $3.62 34 related to the EVERTEC sale Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased by $171.4 million, or 15%, compared with the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was principally due to $38.8 million in prepayment penalties recognized in 2010 mostly as a result of the cancellation of FHLB advances and certain public fund certificates of deposit as part of BPNA’s deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a strategy to increase margin in future periods, and to the repurchase of certain term notes. This compares to $78.3 million in gains on the early extinguishment of debt in 2009, which resulted principally from the junior subordinated debentures that were extinguished as a result of the exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock in August 2009. Also contributing to the increase in operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the previous year, were higher professional fees, principally in the categories of and the consulting fees Westernbank FDIC-assisted transactions and legal fees related in part to credit collection services and litigation support. Furthermore, there were higher maintenance and selling costs on repossessed properties as well as higher write-downs on the value of these properties. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by lower personnel costs, principally a reduction of $12.4 million in pension and restoration plan expenses, and lower equipment expenses. Full time equivalent employees totaled 8,277 as December 31, 2010 compared with 9,407 at December 31. 2009. A decrease in salaries from a reduction in headcount at the BPNA reportable segment, due to restructuring and staff reductions during 2009 and to the sale of EVERTEC in the fourth quarter of 2010, was partially offset by the salaries related to the employees hired from the Westernbank former operations. The decrease in equipment expenses was mainly due to lower depreciation expense of software licenses and electronic equipment as a result of the EVERTEC sale, and to lower depreciation and maintenance and repair expenses in the BPNA reportable segment due to fewer licensing needs and fewer branches as a result of the restructuring of its operations. The primary contributor to the reduction in operating expenses for 2009, compared with 2008, was due to the gain on early extinguishment of debt. A second contributor was the decrease in personnel costs, which was primarily the result of a reduction in headcount from 10,387 (excluding discontinued operations) at December 31, 2008 to 9,407 at December 31, 2009, a freeze in the pension plan, the suspension of matching contributions to all savings plans and continuation of a salary and hiring freeze. Furthermore, there was a decrease in business promotion for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with 2008, principally related to the BPNA reportable segment mostly associated with downsizing of the operations. The BPPR reportable segment also contributed with a reduction in business promotion as a result of cost control measures on expenditures in general, including mailing campaigns, among others. Equipment expenses decreased due to lower amortization of software packages and depreciation of technology equipment, in part because such software and equipment was fully amortized in 2008 or early 2009. Also, the decrease is partially due to lower equipment requirements and software licensing because of the downsizing of the Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations and the transfer of E-LOAN’s technology operations to EVERTEC in Puerto Rico, eliminating two data processing centers. The reduction in professional fees was mostly due to the fact that, in 2008, the Corporation incurred consulting and advisory services associated to the U.S. sale transactions and valuation services, which were not recurrent in 2009. Also, the reduction was influenced by lower credit bureau fees and other loan origination related services given the exiting by E-LOAN of the direct lending business during 2008, lower programming fees and temporary services. The favorable variances in operating expenses comparing 2009 with 2008 results were partially offset by higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums resulting in part from an FDIC revised risk-weighted methodology and an FDIC special assessment designed to replenish the deposit insurance fund. Income Taxes Income tax expense amounted to $108.2 million for the year December 31, 2010, compared with an income tax benefit of $8.3 million for the previous year. The increase in income tax expense for 2010 was due to higher pre-tax earnings in 2010 related to the Puerto Rico operations, mostly related to income subject to capital gain tax rate and by lower benefit on net exempt interest income. In addition, in 2009, there was an increase in the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% that resulted in an income tax benefit during the year 2009 as compared to 2010. The change in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared with 2009 was mainly due to a reduction in the net tax exempt interest income. Also, in 2009 there was an increase in the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% which resulted in an income tax benefit due to the increase in the deferred tax asset. The change in the effective tax rate for the year ended 2009 as compared with 2008 was mainly due to the establishment during 2008 of a valuation allowance on all of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. operations. Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $8.3 million, compared with an income tax expense of $461.5 million for 2008. The decrease in income tax expense for 2009 was primarily due to the impact on the initial recording of the valuation allowance on the U.S. deferred tax assets during 2008 as compared to the year 2009, and by lower pre-tax earnings in 2009 related to the Puerto Rico operations. The Corporation’s net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 amounted to $377 million (net of the valuation allowance of $1.3 billion) compared to $364 million at December 31, 2009. Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements provides the composition of the net deferred tax assets as of such dates. All of 35 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 pertain to the Puerto Rico operations. Of related to the U.S. operations, without considering the valuation allowance, the amount $1.1 billion is attributable to net operating losses of such operations. The components of the income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are included in the following table. Table - Components of Income Tax 2010 2009 2008 % of pre-tax loss Amount % of pre-tax loss Amount % of pre-tax loss (In thousands) Computed income tax at statutory rates Benefits of net tax exempt interest income Amount $100,586 (7,799) Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate (143,844) Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions Deferred tax asset valuation allowance Non-deductible expenses Adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate State taxes and others Income tax expense (benefit) 13,908 143,754 28,130 – (26,505) $108,230 full The year 2008 in the recorded operations was valuation allowance in the Corporation’s in U.S. consideration of the requirements of ASC Topic 740. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for information on the requirements of ASC Topic 740. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position, along with the evaluation of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, has caused management to conclude that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to fully realize the deferred tax assets in the future, considering solely the criteria of ASC 740. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. This situation is mainly due to the increased charge-offs in the construction loan portfolio in particular, including the charges related to the proposed sale of the portfolio. The Corporation weights all available evidence, positive and negative, to assess the realization of the deferred tax asset. Positive evidence assessed included the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking operations very strong earnings history and management’s view, based on that history, that the event causing this loss is not a continuing condition of the operations; new legislation extending the period of carryover of net operating losses to 10 years; and unrealized gain on appreciated assets that could be realized to increase taxable income. Such positive evidence is enough to outweigh the negative evidence of the cumulative loss. Based on this evidence, the Corporation has 41% (3) (59) 6 59 11 – (11) 44% ($230,241) 41% ($85,384) 39% (50,261) (1,842) 40,625 282,933 – (12,351) (37,165) ($8,302) 9 – (7) (50) – 2 6 (62,600) (17,905) 29 8 16,398 643,011 (8) (294) – – (31,986) – – 15 1% $461,534 (211%) concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations will be realized. Management will reassess the realization of the deferred tax assets based on the criteria of ASC Topic 740 each reporting period. To the extent the U.S. operations improve and the deferred tax asset becomes realizable, the Corporation will be able to reduce the valuation allowance through earnings. the financial results of that Refer to Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on income taxes. Fourth Quarter Results The Corporation recognized a net loss of $227.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with a net loss of $213.2 million for the same quarter of 2009. Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $354.6 million, compared with $269.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2009. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to discount accretions on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The Corporation’s borrowing costs also decreased as a result of a low interest rate scenario and management’s actions to reduce borrowing costs, principally prepaying high cost FHLB advances. Additionally, there were higher yields on consumer loans principally reflected in the credit cards portfolio, due in part to revisions made to the spread charged over the prime rate for different risk categories. The provision for loan losses totaled $354.4 million or 74% of net charge-offs for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared to $352.8 million or 118% of net charge-offs for the fourth quarter of 2009. The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 includes the effect of the $176 million charge to provide for the difference between the the portfolios book value and the estimated fair value of transferred to loans held-for-sale. Excluding the $176 million increase in provision related to these reclassifications, the provision for loan losses declined by $175 million in the fourth quarter of 2010, compared with the same quarter in the previous year. The provision for loan losses for the fourth quarter of 2010, when compared with the same quarter in 2009, reflects higher net charge-offs by $179.0 million, mainly in construction loans and loans by $126.9 million and $94.8 million, commercial respectively. These increases were offset by decreases in net charge-offs in consumer loans by $27.9 million, mortgage loans by $11.7 million, and leases by $3.0 million. The in the commercial and construction loans net increases charge-offs were primarily attributed to the Corporation’s decision to promptly charge-off previously reserved impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland. The decreases in the consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs were mostly driven by more stable credit trends experienced by the Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations, particularly in the home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages portfolios. Also, these decreases were influenced in part by portfolio reductions in U.S. mortgage loans, and in the consumer loan portfolios at both reportable segments. Non-interest income totaled $105.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with $175.9 million for the same quarter in 2009. The decrease in non-interest income was mainly impacted by higher adjustments to indemnity reserve of $35.0 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, related to loans sold with credit recourse and final settlements on some representation and warranty liabilities. The decrease in non- interest income is also due to lower credit card and debit cards fees as a result of lower merchant banking fees due to sale of this operations as part of the EVERTEC transaction. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by lower unfavorable valuation adjustment in the value of mortgage servicing rights and a favorable impact due to the fair value change of the equity appreciation instrument issued as part of the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction. Operating expenses totaled $344.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with $298.8 million for the same quarter in the previous year. The increase in operating expenses was impacted by the prepayment penalties of $12.1 million on the cancellation of $183 million in FHLB advances, the $7.5 million payment to cover the uninsured portion of the settlement of certain securities class action lawsuits and higher processing fees. The higher processing fees reflect the fact that following the sale of the majority interest in EVERTEC, the costs related to continuing services 36 provided by EVERTEC are no longer fully eliminated in the consolidation of financial results. There were also higher other real estate expenses and unfavorable fair value adjustments on repossessed property and higher charges to increase the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by lower equipment expenses mainly because most software packages were transferred to EVERTEC as part of the sale. Income tax benefit amounted to $11.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with an income tax expense of $6.9 million for the same quarter of 2009. The variance of $18.7 million was primarily due to a higher loss before tax in the Puerto Rico operations for the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS The Corporation’s reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. A Corporate group has been defined to support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments. For a description of the Corporation’s reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 39 to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC described in the Overview section, the Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as a reportable segment and therefore, historical financial information for EVERTEC, including the merchant acquiring business that was part of the BPPR reportable segment but transferred to EVERTEC in connection with the sale, has been reclassified under Corporate for all periods discussed. The financial results for Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, a former subsidiary of EVERTEC, and the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa, formerly included as part of the EVERTEC reportable segment, are included as part of the Corporate group. Revenues from the Corporation’s equity interest in EVERTEC are being reported as non-interest income in the Corporate group. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments. The Corporate group had a net income of $432.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with a net income of $17.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The variance in the year-to-date results for the Corporate group was principally due to: k higher non-interest income by $575.4 million, principally due to the gain on sale of a majority interest in the 37 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT processing and technology business in the third quarter of 2010; commercial and mortgage loan portfolios were partially offset by an improvement in the consumer loan portfolios. in by losses $15.8 million k higher operating expenses by $70.6 million which were on early impacted extinguishment of debt related to the cancellation of $175 million in medium term notes of the bank holding company and $24.6 million transaction costs related to the EVERTEC sale, compared with gains of $80.3 million junior associated with subordinated debentures during 2009 as part of the exchange of for shares of trust preferred securities common stock of the Corporation. Also, a charge of $7.5 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010 to cover the uninsured portion of the settlement of certain securities class action lawsuits; and extinguishment the of k higher income tax expense by $59.7 million principally due to higher taxable income resulting from the gain on the sale of the processing and technology business. Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below. of its on efforts previously, focused most the Westernbank Banco Popular de Puerto Rico The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment’s net the year ended income amounted to $46.6 million for December 31, 2010, compared with $158.3 million for 2009 and $227.5 million for 2008. During 2010, this reportable segment integrating Westernbank’s operations and managing credit quality. As indicated FDIC-assisted transaction added approximately $8.6 billion in unpaid principal balance of loans and $2.4 billion in deposits. A majority of the loans are covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements, thus reducing the Corporation’s exposure to credit risk on those loans. As part of the transaction, the Corporation added twelve branches to its branch network and retained approximately employees. The Westernbank acquisition also offers many opportunities to grow the Corporation’s business moving forward. Westernbank had approximately 240,000 clients, 140,000 of which did not have a relationship with Popular at the time of the transaction. Furthermore, the majority had only one banking relationship with Westernbank, which cross-selling opportunities for the Corporation. 57% of Westernbank’s translates into The prolonged recession in the Puerto Rican economy continued to have a negative impact on BPPR’s credit quality during 2010. As shown in the credit quality data included in the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A, during 2010, the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico continued to experience high level of charge-offs in the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and to a lesser extent, in mortgage loans, principally due to reductions in real estate collateral values. Deterioration in the construction, The main factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for 2010, compared with the previous year, included the following: k higher net interest income by $229.3 million, or 26%, mainly as a result of the $79.8 million discount accretion on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics and the $207.0 million discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, as well as lower cost of deposits, partially offset by the cost of funding the note issued to the FDIC as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The BPPR reportable segment’s net interest yield was adversely impacted by funding the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, a non-interest earning asset, with interest bearing liabilities, the note issued to the FDIC. The BPPR reportable segment had a net interest margin of 4.43% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with 3.80% for the same period in 2009; k lower provision for loan losses by $13.9 million, or 2%, mainly as the result of higher increases in reserves during 2009, primarily related to the construction and commercial loan portfolios. The BPPR reportable segment experienced an increase of $168.3 million in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with 2009, principally associated with increases in the commercial and construction loan net charge-offs by $106.6 million and $93.4 million, respectively. The increases in net charge- offs of the commercial and construction loan portfolios impaired portions of collateral include charge-offs of dependent loans of $71.5 million and $81.4 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, there were $498 million of loans in the BPPR individually evaluated for reportable segment with a related allowance for loan losses of $14 million, compared with $1.0 billion and $190 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009. Non- performing loans held-in-portfolio in this reportable segment totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $1.5 billion at December 31, 2009. The decrease in non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was mostly reflected in construction loans by $540 million, and commercial loans by $31 million, offset by an increase in mortgage loans by $206 million. The decreases in the commercial and construction loans in non-performing status were principally prompted by the reclassification of approximately $603 million worth of loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. This reclassification had an impact in the provision for loan losses for the BPPR reportable segment of approximately impairment $56.0 million. The majority of these loans are expected to be sold in the first quarter of 2011, and consist principally of non-performing construction, commercial real estate and land loans in Puerto Rico. The increase in non-performing mortgage loans was principally due to the further deterioration of the Puerto Rico economy, principally as a result of higher unemployment rates, housing value declines, among other factors. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 3.26% at December 31, 2010, compared with 4.36% at December 31, 2009. The provision for loan losses represented 90% of net charge- offs for 2010, compared with 122% of net charge-offs for 2009. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 4.69% for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with 3.34% for 2009; of securities investment adjustment k lower non-interest income by $218.5 million, or 33%, lower gains on the sale and primarily as a result of valuation of $223.7 million, reflecting the absence of prior year’s $227.6 million gain derived principally from the sale of U.S. Treasury notes, U.S. agencies and equity securities. Lower non-interest income also reflects lower trading account profit by $23.3 million mainly in the mortgage banking business, and a reduction in the caption of gain on sale of loans and adjustments to indemnity reserves of $50.0 million, mainly due to increases in indemnity reserves for loans sold with credit recourse. Also, non- interest income for 2010 included a $25.6 million negative impact from the net reduction of the FDIC loss sharing indemnification asset resulting principally from the Corporation’s application of reciprocal accounting on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and on the accretion of the fair value adjustment on unfunded credit commitments derived also from the FDIC-assisted transaction (at approximately 80% of the amounts recognized in interest income and other operating income, respectively), net of the accretion of the FDIC loss sharing indemnification asset due to passage of time. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by an increase in other operating income of $58.8 million resulting mostly from the accretion of the fair value adjustment on the unfunded lending commitments due to the passage of time; and, $42.6 million in favorable changes in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC; k higher operating expenses by $108.1 million, or 14%, mainly due to higher personnel costs, professional fees and other operating expenses. The increase in personnel costs was mainly due to the new hires from Westernbank while the increase in other operating expenses was mostly 38 due to losses associated with write-downs in other real estate property; and k income tax expense of $27.1 million in 2010, compared with an income tax benefit of $1.3 million in 2009, primarily due to lower benefit on net tax exempt interest income. In addition, there was an increase in the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% that resulted in an income tax benefit during the year 2009 as compared to 2010. The main factors that contributed to the variance in results for the year ended December 31, 2009, when compared with 2008, included: in non-performing loans. Also, k lower net interest income by $92.4 million, or 10%, primarily due to a reduction in the yield of earning assets, principally commercial and construction loans. This decline can be attributed to two main factors: (1) the reduction in rates by the Fed and (2) the increase the BPPR reportable segment experienced a decrease in the yield of funds sold. Partially investment securities and federal offsetting this unfavorable impact to net interest income was a reduction in the average cost of funds, driven by a reduction in the cost of deposits and short-term borrowings due to the decrease in rates by the Fed and management’s actions to lower the rates paid on certain deposits. Also, the unfavorable variance in net interest income was associated with a decline in the average volume of investment securities and in the loan portfolio, in part due to the slowdown of loan origination activity and increased levels of loan charge-offs. This negative impact from the reduction in the average volume of earning assets was partially offset by a reduction in the average volume of short-term borrowings, brokered deposits and public fund deposits. Despite a reduction in average loans for the BPPR reportable segment of $758 million when comparing 2009 with 2008, and a significant increase in non-performing loans from $781 million at the end of 2008 to $1.5 billion at the end of 2009, the reportable segment’s net interest margin was 3.80% for 2009, compared with 3.94% for the previous year; k higher provision for loan losses by $104.5 million, or 20%, primarily related to the construction and commercial loan portfolios. The BPPR reportable segment experienced an increase of $160.5 million in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with 2008, principally associated with an increase in construction loan net charge- offs by $131.8 million, mainly related to residential development projects. At December 31, 2009, there were $1.0 billion of loans individually evaluated for impairment in the BPPR reportable segment with a related allowance for loan losses of $190 million, compared with $639 million and $137 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. Non- 39 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT reflected performing loans in this reportable segment totaled $1.5 billion at December 31, 2009, compared with $781 million at December 31, 2008. The increases in in loans were mostly non-performing construction loans by $389 million, commercial loans by $190 million and mortgage loans by $110 million. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 4.36% at December 31, 2009, compared with 3.44% at December 31, 2008. The provision for loan losses represented 122% of net charge- offs for 2009, compared with 148% of net charge-offs for 2008. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment was 3.34% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with 2.18% for 2008; k higher non-interest income by $134.8 million, or 25%, mainly due to higher gains on the sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities by $156.8 million, principally due to the gain on sale of investment securities by BPPR. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $11.9 million, principally for commercial account, overdraft and ATM fees. Other non-interest income aggregate by $34.0 million, which was mostly the result of higher unfavorable changes in the fair value of the servicing rights due to factors such as higher discount rate, delinquency, economic assumptions, and lower credit card fees mostly associated with late payment fees. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by higher mortgage servicing fees due to a greater volume of loans serviced for others; categories decreased in the foreclosure other and k higher operating expenses by $22.6 million, or 3%, mainly due to higher FDIC deposit insurance by $38.4 million, partially offset by lower business promotion, professional fees, personnel costs, equipment expenses, among others. Several cost saving efforts were launched during the year targeting all controllable expenses. Some high impact initiatives included: (i) decreases in business promotion expenses, (ii) headcount reductions by attrition, and (iii) rationalization of technology investments; and k lower income tax expense by $15.5 million. Banco Popular North America For the year ended December 31, 2010, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America had a net loss of $340.3 million, compared to a net loss of $725.9 million for 2009 and a net loss $524.8 million for 2008. The reduction in the loss was driven by a lower provision for loan losses due to a general improvement in several credit quality, partially offset by the impact of transactions, which included an additional provision for loan losses of $120 million in December 2010 in connection with the reclassification of a portfolio of non-conventional residential mortgage loans to held-for-sale and the termination of approximately $417 million in high-cost borrowings, incurring approximately $21.9 million in prepayment penalties. Even though these transactions had a significant impact in 2010, BPNA should benefit in the future from lower funding costs and an improvement in credit quality. credit trends general In the U.S. mainland, management remains focused on managing legacy assets and improving the performance of BPNA’s core banking business. The U.S. operations have followed the on the mainland demonstrating progressive improvement; nonetheless, credit quality continues to be closely monitored. BPNA’s provision for loan losses in 2010 was almost half of what it was in year 2009. Management is working on increasing BPNA’s customer base as it moves from being a mainly Hispanic-focused bank to a more broad-based community bank. To that end, in July 2010, the Corporation launched a rebranding pilot program in Illinois changing the name of the bank from Banco Popular North America to Popular Community Bank in order to appeal to a broader demographic results have been encouraging, reflecting an increase in business from non- Hispanic customers. Management will continue monitoring results to decide on a potential rollout to other regions. group. Initial The main factors that contributed to the variance in results for the year ended December 31, 2010, when compared with 2009, included: certain lending channels k lower net interest income by $5.5 million, or 2%, mainly due to a reduction in the volume of average earning assets, principally loans. The decrease in loans is related to lower originations coupled with deleveraging activity and the exiting of such as non- conventional residential mortgages and the E-LOAN origination platform. Partially offsetting the decrease in the volume of earning assets was a lower cost of interest bearing deposits, mainly time deposits and money market deposits, which contributed to an increase in the net interest margin; as 2009 a during result of higher general commercial for k lower provision for loan losses by $380.0 million, or 49%, reserve principally loans, requirements residential construction loans, U.S. non-conventional mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for individually evaluated impaired loans. There were higher net charge-offs in loans by $68.4 million, and lower net commercial charge-offs loans by $65.2 million, in consumer mortgage loans by $36.9 million, construction loans by $8.3 million, and leases by $1.0 million. For the year ended December 31, 2010, commercial and construction loan net charge-offs include $36.6 million and $19.9 million, respectively, of impaired portions of collateral dependent loans. At December 31, 2010, there were $301 million of in the BPNA individually evaluated impaired loans reportable segment with no specific allowance for loan losses, compared to $629 million and $134 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009. Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio in this reportable segment totaled $460 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $798 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was mostly reflected in the commercial and construction loan portfolios, which decreased by $81 million and $76 million, respectively, coupled by a decrease in non- performing mortgage loans of $174 million. The latter was mainly driven by the reclassification of approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S. non-conventional residential mortgage loans to loans held-for-sale. The ratio loans held-in-portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment was 5.02% at December 31, 2010, compared with 6.98% at December 31, 2009. The provision for loan losses represented 85% of net charge-offs for 2010, compared with 152% of net charge-offs for 2009. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio for the Banco Popular North America operations was 6.01% for 2010, compared with 5.54% in 2009; allowance losses loan for to of k higher non-interest income by $24.3 million, mainly due to lower provisioning in 2010 for representation and warranty reserves on loans sold in previous periods, compared with 2009 charges, and lower losses on the sale of Popular Equipment Finance loans. These favorable variances were partially offset by lower service charges on deposit accounts as described in the Non-interest Income section of this MD&A; k lower operating expenses by $15.9 million, or 5%, principally as a result of lower personnel costs due to the staff reductions from the restructuring efforts, lower net occupancy expenses due to fewer branch locations, and lower equipment expenses also resulting from BPNA’s previous year’s restructuring efforts. Also contributing to the reduction in operating expenses were lower FDIC assessments since 2009, which included a larger deposit base and the one-time special assessment. These variances of were partially $21.9 million on the cancellation of FHLB advances and early termination of certain public fund certificates of deposit as part of BPNA’s deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a strategy to increase margin in future periods; and offset by prepayment penalties k income tax expense increase of $29.2 million in 2010, due to an adjustment of the deferred tax valuation allowance expense, in the year 2009, as a result of the tax sharing agreement between the entities to reflect actual 2009 federal taxable income as reported on the tax returns. In addition, in the year 2009 there was a reversal in the 40 deferred tax valuation allowance due to a refund received from the IRS as a result of the use of the net operating loss carryback available. The main factors that contributed to the variance in results for the year ended December 31, 2009, when compared with 2008, included: k lower net interest income by $36.1 million, or 10%, which was mainly due to lower average volume of commercial, mortgage and personal loans driven in part by the branch actions and the business lending initiatives whereby BPNA exited certain lines of business and E-LOAN’s operation as a direct first mortgage lender was discontinued. Average loans in the BPNA reportable segment declined by $823 million in 2009 compared with 2008. The negative variance in net interest income was also due to lower loan yields, partially offset by lower cost of interest-bearing deposits; a as result of higher general k higher provision for loan losses by $310.0 million, or 66%, principally reserve requirements for commercial loans, construction loans, U.S. non-conventional residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for individually evaluated impaired loans. There were higher net charge-offs in commercial loans by $93.2 million, mortgage loans by $59.9 million, construction loans by $57.7 million and consumer loans by $56.0 million. At December 31, 2009, there were $629 million of individually evaluated impaired loans in the BPNA reportable segment with a specific allowance for loan losses of $134 million, compared to $259 million and $58 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. The loan losses considers increase in the provision for inherent losses in the portfolios evidenced by an increase in non-performing loans in this reportable segment by $377 million, when compared to December 31, 2008. The to loans held-in-portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment was 6.98% at December 31, 2009, compared with 3.42% at December 31, 2008. The provision for loan losses represented 152% of net charge-offs for 2009, compared with 190% of net charge-offs for 2008. The ratio of annualized loans held-in-portfolio for the Banco Popular North America operations was 5.54% for 2009, compared with 2.45% for the same quarter in 2008; loan losses charge-offs allowance ratio of average net for to k lower non-interest income by $110.8 million, or 79%, mainly due to higher indemnity reserve requirements for representations and warranties on certain former sales agreements based on higher volume of claims and loss experience and lower gains on the sale of loans due to greater volume of loans sold during 2008 prior to E-LOAN ceasing to originate loans in late 2008. The indemnity 41 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT reserve level approximated $33 million at December 31, 2009, compared with $6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was due to a significant rise in the level of registered and expected disbursements. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, and collateral, which due to current credit conditions, have resulted in investors being very aggressive in the due diligence for claims. During 2009, repurchases or make- whole events required the Corporation to disburse approximately $15.8 million related to the indemnity reserves. Also, the unfavorable variance in non-interest income reflects lower gains on the sale of a real estate property as the 2008 results included $21.1 million on the sale of a commercial building in New York City and $12.8 million on the sale of six Texas branches; and intangibles) long-lived assets k lower operating expenses by $116.2 million, or 27%. This variance was principally due to lower personnel costs by $65.1 million and business promotion expenses by results included $16.1 million. Also, 2008 financial $10.9 million of impairment on E-LOAN’s trademark. Operating expenses for the BPNA reportable segment included $41.7 million in restructuring related costs lease cancellations, write-off of (including severance, impairments on capitalized software and equipment, in 2008, other compared with $9.5 million in 2009. Besides the decrease associated with lower restructuring costs, the general combined impact of the branch actions and the lending business initiatives plus decreases in all discretionary expending the BPNA across restructuring plan, E-LOAN’s operation as a direct first lender was discontinued with all other mortgage consolidated into BPNA and EVERTEC. activities the restructuring Throughout the implementation of in the BPNA reportable segment have plan, FTEs decreased to in December approximately 1,409 in December 2009; and organization. As reflected the from 2,101 reductions expense 2008 part the of k income tax benefit of $24.9 million in 2009, compared with income tax expense of $114.7 million in 2008. The income tax benefit reported for 2009 relates in part to a tax refund as a result of the 2005 and 2006 net operating loss carry backs. Income tax expense for 2008 included the recording of a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS In 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (“PFH”) by selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations of PFH are presented as “Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of condition and as “Loss from tax” in the consolidated discontinued operations, net of statements of operations. (In millions) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income, including fair value 2009 2008 $0.9 – $30.8 19.0 adjustments on loans and mortgage servicing rights (3.2) (266.9) Operating expenses, including restructuring costs and reductions in value of servicing advances and other real estate [a] Loss on disposition during the period [b] Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations Income tax expense (benefit) [c] 10.9 – 213.5 (79.9) ($13.2) 6.8 ($548.5) 14.9 Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax ($20.0) ($563.4) [a] Restructuring costs amounted to $17.4 million in 2008, which consisted principally of personnel costs of $8.9 million and net occupancy expenses of $6.7 million. [b] Loss on disposition for 2008 includes the loss associated to the sale of manufactured housing loans in September 2008, including lower of cost or market adjustments at reclassification from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Also, it includes the impact of fair value adjustments and other losses incurred during the fourth quarter of 2008 related to the sale of loans, residual interests and servicing related assets. [c] Income tax for 2008 included the impact of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $209.0 million. of for 31, 2010 STATEMENT OF CONDITION ANALYSIS Assets Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this the Corporation’s consolidated 2010 Annual Report statements and condition at December December 31, 2009. Also, refer to the Statistical Summary 2006-2010 in this MD&A for condensed statements of condition for the past five years. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s total assets were $38.7 billion, compared with $34.7 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in total assets from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was mostly due to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date added $8.3 billion in total assets, net of fair value adjustments. This increase was offset in part by a reduction in the portfolio of investment securities and lower volume of loan originations, a run-off of legacy loans in the BPNA reportable segment associated to business lines exited in previous years, and the high volume of loan charge-offs. New originations have been adversely impacted by a negative economic environment that has resulted in weak loan demand. Investment securities The following table provides a breakdown of the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) on a combined basis at December 31, statements provide 2010, 2009 and 2008. Also, Notes 8 and 9 to the consolidated information by financial contractual maturity unrealized the Corporation’s / gains available-for-sale (“HTM”) investment securities. additional and categories to respect and held-to-maturity losses with (“AFS”) gross Table - AFS and HTM Investment Securities (In millions) 2010 2009 2008 U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations Mortgage-backed securities Equity securities Other Total AFS and HTM investment securities $64.0 $56.2 $502.1 1,211.3 1,647.9 4,808.5 144.7 262.8 385.7 1,323.4 2,576.1 9.5 30.2 1,718.0 3,210.2 7.8 4.8 1,656.0 848.5 10.1 8.3 $5,359.2 $6,907.7 $8,219.2 The portfolio of investment securities consists primarily of liquid, high quality securities. The reduction in investment securities from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was mostly impacted by maturities, prepayments and sales. The cash proceeds from these activities were not fully reinvested as part of a strategy to deleverage the balance sheet, including making prepayments on the note issued to the FDIC, as part of the Westernbank-assisted transaction. Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $397.1 million, with gains of approximately $3.8 million. The decline in the Corporation’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios from December 31, 2008 to the end of 2009 was mainly associated with sales of securities in early 2009 and the repayment of maturing securities. As previously indicated in this MD&A, during the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation investment securities available-for-sale, sold $3.4 billion of principally U.S. and U.S. Treasury securities. From the proceeds received from this sale, approximately $2.9 billion were later reinvested, primarily in GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The sale and reinvestment was performed primarily to strengthen common equity by realizing a gain and improving the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios. securities agency (FHLB notes) At December 31, 2010, there were investment securities AFS and HTM with a fair value of $290 million in an unrealized loss 42 position amounting to $9 million. These figures compare with securities of $1.8 billion with unrealized losses of $31 million at December 31, 2009. Management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010 and concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell those investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Loan portfolio Refer to Table H, for a breakdown of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets. Included in Table H are $894 million of loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2010, compared with $91 million at December 31, 2009. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation reclassified approximately $1.0 billion (carrying amount prior to lower of loans fair value held-in-portfolio to loans-held-for-sale, which are expected to be sold during the first quarter of 2011. The loans reclassified consisted construction, commercial real estate and land loans in Puerto Rico and U.S. non-conventional residential mortgage loans and did not include any loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. adjustments) of non-performing principally cost or of Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented in a separate line item in Table H. Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the covered loans are significantly different, thus the Corporation has determined to segregate them in the information included in Table H. Excluding the acquired covered loans, the volume of all loan portfolios at December 31, 2010, except for mortgage loans, declined when compared to December 31, 2009. This generally reflects weak loan demand, the high level of loan charge-offs as a result of the downturn in the real estate market, a continued weak economy, and the exiting or downsizing of certain loan origination channels at certain business lines at BPNA, which portfolios are currently in a run-off mode. A similar trend was experienced in the loan impacted by similar factors. portfolio from 2008 to 2009, Furthermore, the reduction since 2008 was influenced by the restructuring of the Corporation’s U.S. operations, including the discontinuance of PFH operations and E-LOAN ceasing to originate loans since the end of 2008 and the exiting of certain business lines at BPNA, primarily during 2009. 43 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table H Loans Ending Balances (including Loans Held-for-Sale) (In thousands) 2010 2009 2008 [1] 2007 2006 At December 31, Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Total non-covered loans Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements[2] Total loans $11,454,013 913,595 602,993 4,945,388 3,705,984 $21,621,973 $4,836,882 $12,666,955 1,724,373 675,629 4,691,145 4,045,807 $23,803,909 – $13,687,060 2,212,813 1,080,810 4,639,464 4,648,784 $26,268,931 – $13,685,791 1,941,372 1,164,439 7,434,800 5,684,600 $13,115,442 1,421,395 1,226,490 11,695,156 5,278,456 $29,911,002 – $32,736,939 – $26,458,855 $23,803,909 $26,268,931 $29,911,002 $32,736,939 [1] Loans disclosed exclude the discontinued operations of PFH. [2] Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of the loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements. in those operations is running off. At December 31, 2010, this portfolio had decreased $27 million when compared with December 31, 2009. The mortgage loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 increased $254 million from December 31, 2009. The BPPR reportable segment showed an increase of $646 million, while the BPNA reportable segment experienced a reduction of $392 million. The Corporation’s mortgage loan origination subsidiary in Puerto Rico, Popular Mortgage, continued its efforts to originate loans despite the weak economic conditions in the Island. During the third quarter of 2010, the Puerto Rico government signed into law an aggressive housing incentive package which is helping boost residential housing sales activity. The reduction at BPNA resulted principally from the discontinuance of the non- conventional mortgage loan origination business and a higher volume of net charge-offs in the non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio. As previously reported, the loan portfolio acquired amounted to over $8.6 billion in unpaid principal balance with a fair value of $5.2 billion. Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements presents the carrying amount of the covered loans broken down by major loan type categories. A substantial amount of the covered loans, or approximately $4.5 billion of their carrying is accounted for under ASC value at December 31, 2010, the Critical Accounting to 310-30. Subtopic Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for information on the accounting for the acquired loans. Refer The explanations for loan portfolio variances discussed below exclude the impact of the acquired covered loans. $2.0 decreased compared billion when At December 31, 2010, the commercial and construction loan portfolios to December 31, 2009. The decrease in these portfolios was both reflected in the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments and was impacted by lower new loan origination activity, portfolio run-off associated with the U.S. operations, and loan net charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2010 that totaled $833 million. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation decided to promptly charge-off previously reserved impaired amounts of loans, both in Puerto Rico and collateral dependent U.S. operations, which totaled $210 million. origination channels exited in in the consumer The decrease loan portfolio from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 of approximately $340 million, or 8%, was mostly reflected in personal and auto loans in Puerto Rico and home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages in E-LOAN. Net charge-offs in the consumer loan portfolio amounted to $214 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. Also, portfolio run-off exceeded the volume of new personal and auto loan originations in the BPPR reportable segment due to current weak economic conditions. Furthermore, the run-off of Popular Finance’s loan portfolio contributed to such decrease. Popular Finance’s operations were closed in late 2008. Also, there were reductions in the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA reportable segment, primarily due to loan charge-offs and the run-off of its auto, closed-end second mortgages and home equity lines of credit portfolios, which are part of the business lines exited in prior years. The decline financing portfolio from lease December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was mostly at the BPPR reportable segment by $46 million, which similar to other loan portfolios continues to reflect the general slowdown in loan originations. The Corporation’s U.S. operations are no longer originating lease financing and as such, the outstanding portfolio in the The following table presents acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date: (In thousands) Contractually-required principal and interest Non-accretable difference Cash flows expected to be collected Accretable yield Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 $9,850,613 3,402,907 6,447,706 1,538,059 $4,909,647 The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction from date of acquisition through December 31, 2010, and which are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows: (In thousands) Accretable yield Carrying amount of loans Balance at January 1, 2010 Additions [1] Accretion Payments received Balance at December 31, 2010 – $1,538,059 (206,951) – $4,909,647 206,951 (576,670) $1,331,108 $4,539,928 [1] Represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of acquisition. There were no reclassifications from non-accretable difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, none of the acquired loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans. As indicated in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A, the Corporation accounts for acquired lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loan, if the loan is accruing interest. The 44 following table presents acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date: (In thousands) Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected $290,810 $457,201 $164,427 The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. FDIC loss share indemnification asset As part of the loan portfolio fair value estimation in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation established the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, which represented the present value of the estimated losses on loans to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset amounted to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010 and is presented in a separate line item in the consolidated statement of condition. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the FDIC loss sharing agreements and the resulting indemnification asset. Other assets The following table provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of condition at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Table - Other Assets (In thousands) 2010 2009 Change Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance) Investments under the equity $388,466 $363,967 $24,499 method 299,185 99,772 199,413 Bank-owned life insurance program Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment Other prepaid expenses Derivative assets Trade receivables from brokers and counterparties Others 237,997 232,387 5,610 147,513 75,149 72,510 206,308 130,762 71,822 (58,795) (55,613) 688 347 234,906 1,104 218,795 (757) 16,111 Total other assets $1,456,073 $1,324,917 $131,156 The increase in other assets from December 31, 2009 to the same date in 2010 was primarily due to the 49% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which is being accounted as an investment under the equity method. Refer to the Overview section of this 45 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT MD&A and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the EVERTEC transaction. This increase was partially offset by reductions in the FDIC insurance premiums prepayment due to amortization and in other prepaid expenses, principally software packages due to the sale of EVERTEC. Deposits and Borrowings The composition of the Corporation’s financing to total assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows: Table - Financing to Total Assets (Dollars in millions) Non-interest bearing deposits Interest bearing core deposits Other interest bearing deposits Federal funds and repurchase agreements Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Others Stockholders’ equity N.M. means not meaningful Deposits % increase (decrease) from 2009 to 2010 % of total assets 2010 2009 9.9% 4.4 (4.0) (8.4) N.M. 57.4 23.4 49.7 12.8% 13.0% 40.4 16.0 6.2 0.9 10.8 3.1 9.8 43.1 18.6 7.6 – 7.6 2.8 7.3 2010 2009 $4,939 15,637 6,186 2,413 364 4,170 1,213 3,801 $4,495 14,983 6,447 2,633 7 2,649 983 2,539 A breakdown of the Corporation’s deposits at period-end is included in Table I. Table I Deposits Ending Balances (Dollars in thousands) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Demand deposits[1] Savings, NOW and money market deposits Time deposits Total $5,501,430 10,371,580 10,889,190 $5,066,282 9,635,347 11,223,265 $4,849,387 9,554,866 13,145,952 $5,115,875 9,804,605 13,413,998 $4,910,848 9,200,732 10,326,751 $26,762,200 $25,924,894 $27,550,205 $28,334,478 $24,438,331 At December 31, [1] Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. Brokered certificates of deposit, which are included in time deposits, amounted to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $2.7 billion at December 31, 2009. The decline was principally in the BPNA reportable segment. The increase in demand and saving deposits from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was principally related to the deposits assumed in the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction. Time deposits, excluding brokered deposits, showed an increase of $81 million, which consisted of an increase of $885 million in BPPR primarily from the assumed deposits of Westernbank, partially offset by a reduction in the BPNA reportable segment of $804 million mainly due to reduced levels of individual certificates of deposits and lower deposits gathered through E-LOAN’s internet platform, the effect of a reduction in the pricing of these deposits and strategic actions taken that reduced BPNA’s asset base considerably. The decrease in deposits from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 was the result of a combination of factors, which included lower brokered deposits, which declined from $3.1 billion at December 31, 2008 to $2.7 billion at the same date in 2009, and the impact of the closure and sale of branches in the U.S. mainland operations. In October 2009, the Corporation sold six New Jersey bank branches with approximately $225 million in deposits. In addition, there were reduced levels of deposits gathered through E-LOAN’s internet platform, in part influenced by the effect of a gradual reduction in the pricing of these deposits. Borrowings The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $6.9 billion at billion at December December 31, 2009. The increase of $1.6 billion in borrowings from the end of 2009 to December 31, 2010 was related to the note issued to the FDIC in relation to the FDIC-assisted compared with $5.3 2010, 31, 46 transaction, which amounted to $2.5 billion at December 31, 2010, partially offset by a decrease of $439 million in advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), a reduction of $220 million in repurchase agreements, and the cancellation of $175 million in term notes, which had contractual maturities in September 2011 and were repurchased by the Corporation from holders of record in July 2010. During 2010, the Corporation prepaid $363 million in FHLB advances. The prepayment of the FHLB advances as well as the repurchase of the term notes was associated with the Corporation’s strategy to extinguish certain high-cost debt, which will benefit the Corporation’s cost of funds going forward. The note issued to the FDIC is collateralized by the covered loans (other than certain consumer loans) and other real estate acquired in the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from such assets, including cash inflows from claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. Borrowings under the note bear interest at the per annum rate of 2.50% and is paid monthly. The Corporation may prepay the note in whole or in part without any penalty subject to certain notification requirements indicated in the agreement. During the year 2010, the Corporation prepaid $2.6 billion of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets securing the note. The decline in borrowings from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 was directly related to the maturity of unsecured senior term notes of Popular North America during 2009, which had been used to fund the Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations. Term notes classified as notes payable declined by $803 million from the end of 2008 to the same date in 2009. Assets sold under agreements to repurchase at December 31, 2009 presented a reduction of $774 million when compared with December 31, 2008. This decline was associated in part to lower financing needs as a result of a lower volume of investment securities due to deleveraging. In August 2009, the Corporation issued junior subordinated debentures with an aggregate liquidation amount of $936 million as part of the exchange agreement with the U.S. Treasury. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of these debentures was $424 million since it is reported net of a discount amounting to $512 million. The discount resulted from the recording of the debentures at fair value because of the accounting treatment of the exchange. The increase in junior subordinated debentures was partially offset by the reduction in previously outstanding junior subordinated debentures of $410 million, associated with the exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock. Refer to a subsequent section titled Exchange Offers in this MD&A for detailed information on these exchange transactions. In March 2010, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance sent a letter to certain public companies requesting information about repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or other transactions involving the obligation to repurchase the transferred assets. The letter requests several disclosures with respect to such transfers that are recorded as sales. In this regard, the Corporation records all its repurchase transactions as collateralized borrowings rather than as sales transactions. Refer to Notes 18, 19 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Corporation’s borrowings at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Also, refer to the Liquidity Risk section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s funding sources at December 31, 2010. Other liabilities The increase in other liabilities of $229 million from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 included the equity appreciation instrument issued as part of the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction with a fair value of $10 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $44 million in the GNMA buy-back option and an increase of $31 million in the reserve for loans serviced with credit recourse and on loans sold with to the representation and warranty arrangements. Refer Liquidity Risk section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2010. Stockholders’ Equity Stockholders’ equity totaled $3.8 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $2.5 billion at December 31, 2009 and $3.3 billion at December 31, 2008. Refer to the consolidated statements of condition and of stockholders’ equity for information on the composition of stockholders’ equity. Also, the disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an integral component of stockholders’ equity, are included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. The increase in stockholders’ equity from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was principally due to a common stock issuance during the second quarter of 2010, which contributed $1.15 billion in additional capital. Refer to the Overview section of this MD&A for the main driver of this capital raise. The decrease in stockholders’ equity from the end of 2008 to the end of 2009 was principally the result of the net loss of $573.9 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain significant transactions that occurred during 2009 had an impact on various categories of stockholders’ equity, including a reduction in preferred stock and an increase in common stockholders’ equity. During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation issued 357,510,076 new shares of common stock in exchange for its Series A and Series B preferred stock and trust preferred securities, which resulted in a total increase in common stockholders’ equity of $923 million. This increase included newly issued shares of common stock and surplus of $612 million and a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $311 million, including $80.3 million in gains on the extinguishment of junior subordinated debentures that relate 47 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT to the trust preferred securities. Preferred stock reflected a reduction as a result of the exchange of Series A and B preferred stock for shares of common stock of $537 million. of In December 2008, the Corporation received $935 million from the United the Treasury States Department (“U.S. Treasury”) as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program in exchange for the Corporation’s Class C preferred stock and warrants on common stock. In August 2009, the Corporation exchanged newly issued trust preferred securities for the shares of Series C Preferred Stock that were issued to the U.S. Treasury. The reduction in total stockholders’ equity related to the U.S. Treasury exchange transaction at the exchange date was approximately $416 million, which was principally impacted by the reduction of $935 million of aggregate liquidation preference value of the Series C preferred stock, partially offset by the $519 million discount on the junior subordinated debentures. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the exchange offers, ratios, relevant price per share and fair value per share used for the exchange computations and accounting impact. The objective of the exchange offer was to boost common equity. corresponding to a statutory reserve fund applicable exclusively to Puerto Rico banking institutions. The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, BPPR was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement. In June 2009, management announced the suspension of dividends on the Corporation’s common stock and Series A and B preferred stock. The Corporation did not pay dividends on its common stock during 2010. At the end of 2010, the Corporation began paying dividends once again on the Series A and B preferred stock. Dividends paid on the Series A and B preferred stock totaled $310 thousand in 2010, compared with $22.5 million in 2009 and $31.4 million in 2008. Included within surplus at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $402 million in stockholders’ equity REGULATORY CAPITAL Table J presents the Corporation’s capital adequacy information for the years 2006 through 2010. Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements presents further information on the Corporation’s regulatory capital requirements, including the regulatory capital ratios of its depository institutions, BPPR and BPNA. Table J Capital Adequacy Data (In thousands) Risk-based capital: Tier I capital Supplementary (Tier II) capital Total Capital Risk-weighted assets: Balance sheet items Off-balance sheet items 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 At December 31, $3,733,776 328,107 $2,563,915 346,527 $3,272,375 384,975 $3,361,132 417,132 $3,727,860 441,591 $4,061,883 $2,910,442 $3,657,350 $3,778,264 $4,169,451 $22,588,231 3,099,186 $23,182,230 2,964,649 $26,838,542 3,431,217 $30,294,418 2,915,345 $32,519,457 2,623,264 Total risk-weighted assets $25,687,417 $26,146,879 $30,269,759 $33,209,763 $35,142,721 Ratios Tier I capital (minimum required - 4.00%) Total capital (minimum required - 8.00%) Leverage ratio* Equity to assets Tangible equity to assets Equity to loans Internal capital generation rate 14.54% 15.81 9.72 8.51 6.78 12.62 4.21 9.81% 11.13 7.50 7.80 6.12 11.48 (21.88) 10.81% 12.08 8.46 8.21 6.64 12.14 (42.11) 10.12% 11.38 7.33 8.20 6.64 11.79 (6.61) 10.61% 11.86 8.05 7.75 6.25 11.66 4.48 * All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted quarterly average assets, depending on the bank’s classification. adequately-capitalized To meet minimum, regulatory requirements, an institution must maintain a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 4% and a Total Capital ratio of 8%. A “well- capitalized” institution must generally maintain capital ratios 200 basis points higher than the minimum guidelines. The risk- based capital rules have been further supplemented by a Tier 1 Leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted quarterly average total assets, after certain adjustments. “Well- capitalized” bank holding companies must have a minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio of 5%. The Corporation’s ratios presented in Table J show that the Corporation was “well-capitalized” for regulatory purposes, the highest classification, for all years presented. BPPR and BPNA were also well-capitalized. The Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios for 2010 were positively impacted by the capital raise from the common stock issuance and the sale of a majority interest in EVERTEC. The Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios for 2009 when compared with the previous year were negatively impacted by the following principal loss for the third consecutive year; (ii) higher disallowance for total capital inclusion related to the allowance for loan losses, which is a critical component of the Corporation’s financial condition that management continued to increase during 2009; and (iii) an increase in the deferred tax assets disallowed for Tier 1 capital inclusion. factors: (i) net During 2010 and 2009, the Corporation made capital contributions amounting to $745 million and $590 million, respectively, to its banking subsidiary BPNA to maintain BPNA’s capital ratios at well-capitalized levels. In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities restricted core capital represent elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25 percent of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation. Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit will be effective on March 31, 2011. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the use of trust preferred securities issued before May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital over a 3-year period commencing on January 1, 2013. Trust preferred securities issued on or after May 19, 2010 no longer 48 qualify as Tier 1 capital. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. The Corporation has not issued since May 19, 2010. At any trust preferred securities December 31, 2010, the remaining trust preferred securities corresponded to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act includes an exemption from the phase-out provision that applies to these capital securities because they were issued prior to October 4, 2010. If for specific During the 2010 third quarter, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision revised the Capital Accord (Basel III), which narrows the definition of capital and increases capital requirements exposures. The new capital requirements will be phased-in over six years beginning in the 2013. Corporation estimates they would not have a significant impact on our regulatory capital ratios based on our current understanding of the revisions to capital qualification. We await clarification from our banking regulators on their interpretation of Basel III and any additional requirements to the stated thresholds. adopted currently, revisions were these The Corporation’s tangible common equity ratio was 8.01% at December 31, 2010 and 5.40% at December 31, 2009. The Corporation’s Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio was 10.95% at December 31, 2010, compared with 6.39% at December 31, 2009. The table that follows provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets at December 31, 2010 and to tangible December 31, 2009. assets (In thousands, except share or per share information) Total stockholders’ equity Less: Preferred stock Less: Goodwill Less: Other intangibles 2010 2009 $3,800,531 (50,160) (647,387) (58,696) $2,538,817 (50,160) (604,349) (43,803) Total tangible common equity $3,044,288 $1,840,505 Total assets Less: Goodwill Less: Other intangibles Total tangible assets Tangible common equity to tangible assets Common shares outstanding at end $38,722,962 (647,387) (58,696) $34,736,325 (604,349) (43,803) $38,016,879 $34,088,173 8.01% 5.40% of period 1,022,727,802 639,540,105 Tangible book value per common share $2.98 $2.88 The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible 49 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the Corporation’s capital position. In connection with the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (“SCAP”), the Federal Reserve Board began supplementing its assessment of the capital adequacy of a bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as Tier 1 common equity. Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in the federal banking regulations, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied the and are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, in place to calculate these Corporation has procedures measures using regulatory components. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP. appropriate GAAP or the The table below reconciles the Corporation’s total common stockholders’ equity (GAAP) at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 to Tier 1 common equity as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies (non-GAAP). (In thousands) Common stockholders’ equity Less: Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax [1] Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets [2] Less: Intangible assets: Goodwill Other disallowed intangibles Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges [3] Total Tier 1 common equity 2010 2009 $3,750,371 $2,488,657 (159,700) (231,475) (91,068) (179,655) (647,387) (26,749) (604,349) (18,056) (1,538) (2,343) 129,511 $2,813,033 78,488 $1,671,674 [1] In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values. In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. [2] Approximately $144 million of the Corporation’s $388 million of net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 ($186 million and $364 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009), were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $231 million of such assets at December 31, 2010 ($180 million at December 31, 2009) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as “disallowed deferred tax assets”, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $13 million of the Corporation’s other net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 ($2 million at December 31, 2009) represented primarily the following items (a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill and other intangibles. to limitation under the guidelines; (b) [3] The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the impact of pension liability adjustment. RISK MANAGEMENT Managing risk is an essential component of the Corporation’s business. Risk identification and monitoring are key elements in overall risk management. The following principal risks, which have been incorporated into the Corporation’s risk management program, include: k Interest Rate Risk (“IRR”) - Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from differences between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows (repricing risk); from changing rate relationships among different yield curves from risk); the spectrum of changing rate relationships across maturities (yield curve risk); and from interest related options embedded in bank products (options risk). affecting bank activities (basis k Market Risk - Potential for loss resulting from changes in market prices of the assets or liabilities in the Corporation’s or in any of its subsidiaries’ portfolio. Market risk may arise from market-making, dealing and position-taking activities 50 in interest rate, foreign exchange, equity and commodity markets. k Liquidity Risk - Potential loss resulting from the for Corporation or its subsidiaries not being able to meet their obligations when they come due. This could be a result of market conditions, the ability of the Corporation to liquidate assets or access funding sources. This risk also encompasses the possibility that an instrument cannot be closed out or sold at its economic value, which might be a result of stress in the market or in a specific security type given its credit, volume and maturity. k Credit Risk - Potential for default or loss resulting from an obligor’s failure to meet the terms of any contract with the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, or failure otherwise to perform as agreed. Credit risk arises from all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance. k Operational Risk - This the possibility that inadequate or failed systems and internal controls or influences procedures, human error, fraud or external such as disasters, can cause losses. risk is k Compliance Risk and Legal Risk - Potential loss resulting from violations of or non-conformance with laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, existing contracts or ethical standards. for k Strategic Risk - Potential business decisions or decisions. business management analyzes external strategic direction of the Corporation. for loss arising from adverse implementation of improper how incorporates it factors that impact the Also, k Reputational Risk - Potential for loss arising from negative public opinion. The Corporation’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has established a Risk Management Committee (“RMC”) to undertake the responsibilities of overseeing and approving the Corporation’s Risk Management Program. The RMC, will, as an oversight body, monitor and approve the overall business strategies, and corporate policies to identify, measure, monitor and control risks while maintaining the effectiveness and efficiency of the business and operational processes. As an approval body for the Corporation, the RMC reviews and approves relevant risk management policies and critical processes. Also, it periodically reports to the Board about its activities. the implementation of The Board and RMC have delegated to the Corporation’s management the risk management processes. This implementation is split into two separate but coordinated efforts that include (i) business and / or operational units who identify, manage and control the risks resulting from their activities, and (ii) a Risk Management Group (“RMG”). In general, the RMG is mandated with responsibilities such as strategies assessing and reporting to the Corporation’s management and RMC the risk positions of the Corporation, developing and implementing mechanisms, policies and procedures to identify, measure and monitor risks, and monitoring and testing the adequacy and the Corporation’s policies, of guidelines. During 2010, the Corporation commenced its implementation of an Enterprise Risk Management function to create a framework that will facilitate, among other aspects, the identification and management of multiple and cross-enterprise risks. The RMG is responsible for the overall coordination of risk the Corporation and is management (i) Credit Risk composed of three reporting divisions: and (ii) Compliance, Management, Operational Risk Management. Additionally, the Internal Auditing Division provides an independent assessment of the Corporation’s internal control structure and related systems and processes. and (iii) Financial throughout efforts Moreover, management oversight of the Corporation’s risk- taking and risk management activities is conducted through management committees: k CRESCO (Credit Strategy Committee) - Manages the Corporation’s overall credit exposure and approves credit policies, standards and guidelines that define, quantify, and monitor credit risk. Through this committee, management reviews asset quality ratios, trends and forecasts, problem loans, establishes the provision for loan losses and assesses the methodology and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. k ALCO (Asset the policies and approves / Liability Management Committee) - Oversees and processes designed to ensure sound market risk and balance sheet strategies, including the interest rate, liquidity, investment and trading policies. Also, the ALCO monitors the capital position of the Corporation and is briefed on strategies to maintain capital at adequate levels. k ORCO (Operational Committee) - Monitors Risk operational risk management activities to ensure the development and consistent application of operational risk policies, processes and procedures that measure, limit and manage the Corporation’s operational risks while maintaining the effectiveness and efficiency of the operating and businesses’ processes. Market / Interest Rate Risk levels of Popular, Inc. are The financial results and capital constantly exposed to market, interest rate and liquidity risks. The ALCO and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s market, interest rate risk, funding activities and strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the RMC. In addition, the Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of 51 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT policies, enhancing established surrounding interest, and adherence with strengthening controls liquidity and market risk. The ALCO currently meets on a monthly basis and reviews various asset and liability sensitivities, ratios and portfolio information, the Corporation’s liquidity positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions. including but not limited to, and residential The weak estate market the real U.S. economy’s recent performance has had a significant adverse impact on the financial services industry as a whole during the last several years. After the failure of Lehman Brothers and government rescue of several other major financial firms in 2008, the financial markets seized as capital flows were severely disrupted due to risk aversion and the fear of further failures. During 2010, the capital and credit markets stabilized somewhat and the U.S. government continued its intervention programs and implemented various liquidity facilities and programs to maintain liquidity and confidence in the markets. The economic recession that deepened in 2009 in the U.S. mainland appeared to have ended in 2010. The U.S. economy is expected to expand between 3.4% and 3.9% in 2011, though unemployment is projected to remain elevated at close to 9%. In Puerto Rico, the economy remains in a prolonged recession. The pace of job losses decreased in 2010 but total employment still finished the year down 3%. Reduction in payroll and expenditures led the government to reduce its structural deficit to an estimated 12% of recurring revenues, down from 43% the previous year. Greater reduction in government expenditures and fixed investments are not expected in 2011. The government is implementing a tax reform to ease the burden on consumers a high unemployment rate, estimated at 15% at the end of 2010, and the rising price of crude oil is expected to maintain pressure on consumers. The weak economic environment has led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, and reduction of business activity in general. A material rebound in economic activity in P.R. is not expected for 2011. and local businesses. However, routinely in the financial and management Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Corporation has exposures to many different industries and executes counterparties, transactions with counterparties services including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, industry, these transactions and other institutional clients. Many of expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of default of the Corporation’s counterparty or client. the Corporation’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by it cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposures. There is no assurance that any such losses In addition, would not materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s results of operations. The Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve Board, which influences interest rates, maintained the interbank borrowing rates in the same levels of 2009, while taking quantitative easing measures designed to foster and maintain liquidity in the markets. During 2010, the Fed executed several large purchases of mortgage-backed securities and longer term dated treasury securities, striving to improve credit conditions and help the housing market recovery, while addressing deflation concerns. Interest Rate Risk Management considers IRR a potentially predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. As previously indicated, the Corporation is subject to including repricing, various categories of interest rate risk, basis, yield curve and options risks. In addition, interest rates may have an indirect impact on loan demand, loan origination volume, the value of the Corporation’s investment securities holdings, gains and losses on sales of securities and loans, the value of mortgage servicing rights, the funded status of the retirement plans, and other sources of earnings. In limiting interest rate risk to an acceptable level, management may alter the mix of floating and fixed rate assets and liabilities, change pricing schedules, adjust maturities through sales and purchases of investment securities, and enter into derivative contracts, among other alternatives. and deposit Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring flows loan complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective management of interest rate risk begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate rate risk position given line of business forecasts, management objectives, market and policy constraints. expectations The Corporation’s ALCO utilizes various tools for the management of IRR, including simulation modeling and static gap analysis for measuring short-term IRR. Economic value of equity (“EVE”) sensitivities analysis is used to monitor the level of long-term IRR assumed. The three methodologies complement each other and are used jointly to assist in the assessment of the Corporation’s IRR. Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by It also incorporates maturity and interest yields or costs. assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process, future performance under diverse economic conditions. emphasizing Management assesses interest rate risk by comparing its most likely earnings path with various net interest income simulations using many interest rate scenarios that differ in direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of rate scenarios processed during the year included economic most likely scenarios, flat rates, yield curve twists, +/- 200 and +/- 400 basis points parallel ramps and +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis and yield curve risk exposures, and prepayment risk. The asset and liability management group also performs validation procedures on various assumptions used as part of the sensitivity analysis as well as validations of results on a monthly basis. Due to the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the rate scenarios. These Corporation’s deposits and interest interest impact on loans the accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are based on management’s current expectation of future cash flows. The Corporation processes net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios considered in these market risk simulations reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2011. Under a 200 basis points rising rate scenario, 2011 projected net interest income increases by $29.0 million, while under a 400 basis points rising rate scenario, 2011 projected net interest income increases by $45.3 million. These scenarios were compared against the Corporation’s unchanged interest rates forecast. Given the fact that at December 31, 2010, some market interest rates were close to zero, management has focused on measuring the risk on net interest income in rising rate scenarios. As disclosed in the 2009 Annual Report, the 2010 projected net interest income assuming gradual parallel changes during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2010 under the 200 basis points simulation income increasing by $59.8 million, reflected net simulations exclude interest rate 52 while the 400 basis points simulation resulted in an increase of $103.2 million. During 2010, management implemented strategies to reduce the sensitivity of the Corporation’s net interest income to rising interest rates. Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future. repricing volumes Static gap analysis measures the volume of assets and liabilities maturing or repricing at a future point in time. Static gap reports stratify all of the Corporation’s assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions according to the instrument’s maturity, repricing characteristics and optionality, assuming no new business. The typically include adjustments for anticipated future asset prepayments and for differences in sensitivity to market rates. The volume of assets and liabilities repricing during future periods, particularly within one year, is used as one short-term indicator of IRR. Depending on the duration and repricing characteristics, changes in interest rates could either increase or decrease the level of net interest income. For any given period, the pricing structure of the assets and liabilities is matched when an equal amount of such assets and liabilities mature or reprice in that period. Any mismatch of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities is known as a gap position. A positive gap denotes asset sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates could have a positive effect on net interest income, while a decrease in interest rates could have a negative effect on net interest income. As shown in Table K, at December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s one-year cumulative positive gap was $2.0 billion, or 5.93% of total earning assets. This compares with $3.3 billion or 10.15%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. These static measurements do not reflect the results of any projected activity and are best used as early indicators of potential interest rate exposures. They do not incorporate possible action that could be taken to manage the Corporation’s IRR, nor do they capture the basis risks that might be included within that cumulative gap, given possible changes in the spreads between asset rates and the rates used to fund them. 53 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE K Interest Rate Sensitivity (Dollars in thousands) Assets: Money market investments Investment and trading securities Loans Other assets At December 31, 2010 - By Repricing Dates 0-30 days Within 31 - 90 days After three Months but within six months After six months but within nine months After nine months but within one year After one year but within two years After two years Non-interest bearing funds $950,973 388,635 9,559,187 $28,022 501,797 1,334,801 $676,463 927,309 $200 234,596 808,545 $100 222,052 721,283 $864,667 2,377,449 $3,181,222 10,730,281 $5,215,380 Total $979,295 6,069,432 26,458,855 5,215,380 Total 10,898,795 1,864,620 1,603,772 1,043,341 943,435 3,242,116 13,911,503 5,215,380 38,722,962 Liabilities and stockholders’ equity: Savings, NOW and money market and other interest bearing demand deposits Certificates of deposit Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Non-interest bearing deposits Other non-interest bearing liabilities Stockholders’ equity 2,495,136 1,573,106 19 1,867,823 5 1,879,600 1,378,400 162 882,307 205 1,653,010 8,438,162 1,654,944 1,114,425 311,722 61,983 203,113 52,500 565,801 877,874 648,486 453,223 612,354 950,462 97,822 997,190 10,933,689 10,889,190 2,412,550 364,222 4,170,183 4,939,321 1,213,276 3,800,531 4,939,321 1,213,276 3,800,531 Total $5,556,372 $2,689,256 $2,757,479 $2,026,886 $1,335,692 $2,363,391 $12,040,758 $9,953,128 $38,722,962 Interest rate sensitive gap Cumulative interest rate sensitive gap Cumulative interest rate sensitive gap to 5,342,423 5,342,423 (824,636) 4,517,787 (1,153,707) 3,364,080 (983,545) 2,380,535 (392,257) 1,988,278 878,725 2,867,003 1,870,745 4,737,748 (4,737,748) earning assets 15.94% 13.48% 10.04% 7.10% 5.93% 8.56% 14.14% The Corporation uses EVE (economic value of equity) sensitivity analysis to estimate the sensitivity of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporation’s assets minus the estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure long-term interest rate risk because it captures the impact of rate changes up or down in expected cash flows, including principal and interest, from all future periods. EVE sensitivity is measured on a quarterly basis and calculated on +/- 200 basis points parallel rate shocks. As previously mentioned, given the low levels of current market rates, the Corporation will focus on measuring the risk in a rising rate scenario. Policy limits are calculated based on the sensitivity of EVE. The Corporation’s loan and investment portfolios are subject to prepayment risk, which results from the ability of a third-party to repay debt obligations prior to maturity. Prepayment risk also could have a significant impact on the duration of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, since prepayments could shorten (or lower prepayments could extend) the weighted average life of these portfolios. Table L, which presents the maturity distribution of earning assets, takes into consideration prepayment assumptions. TABLE L Maturity Distribution of Earning Assets (Dollars in thousands) Money market securities Investment and trading securities Loans: Commercial Construction Lease financing Consumer Mortgage Total non-covered loans Covered loans under FDIC loss sharing agreements At December 31, 2010 Maturities After one year through five years Fixed interest rates Variable interest rates One year or less After five years Fixed interest rates Variable interest rates $979,295 1,606,494 – $2,274,305 – $318,251 – $1,571,699 – $125,695 3,988,169 880,806 240,144 1,797,235 1,200,685 1,847,039 19,888 362,774 1,105,021 1,670,300 2,272,957 10,972 – 392,794 267,785 973,182 17 75 126,135 1,616,623 2,372,666 1,912 – 284,799 189,995 54 Total $979,295 5,896,444 11,454,013 913,595 602,993 3,705,984 4,945,388 8,107,039 5,005,022 2,944,508 2,716,032 2,849,372 21,621,973 2,406,472 756,290 688,443 464,210 521,467 4,836,882 $13,099,300 $8,035,617 $3,951,202 $4,751,941 $3,496,534 $33,334,594 Note: Equity securities available-for-sale and other investment securities, including Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock held by the Corporation, are not included in this table. Loans held-for-sale have been allocated according to the expected sale date. the trading portfolio of In the opinion of management, the size and composition of the trading portfolio does not represent a significant source of market risk for the Corporation. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation amounted to $547 million and represented 1% of total assets, compared with $462 million and 1% a year earlier. Mortgage-backed securities represented 90% of the trading portfolio at the end of 2010, compared with 93% in 2009. The mortgage-backed securities are investment grade securities, all of which are rated AAA by at least one of the three major rating agencies at December 31, 2010. A significant portion of the trading portfolio is hedged against market risk by positions Popular banking activities. Trading The Corporation’s trading activities are another source of market risk and are subject to policies and risk guidelines approved by the Board to manage such risks. The objective of trading activity at the Corporation is to realize profits by buying or selling acceptable securities based on prudent trading strategies, taking advantage of expected market direction or volatility, or to hedge some type of market risk. This is mostly limited to mortgage the Corporation’s broker-dealer business, also has as an additional objective of maintaining inventory positions for customer resale. Trading positions in the mortgage banking business, which are mostly agency mortgage-backed securities, are hedged in the agency “to be announced” (“TBA”) market. In anticipation of customer demand, the Corporation carries an inventory of capital market instruments and maintains market liquidity by quoting bid and offer prices and trading with other market makers and clients. Positions are also taken in interest rate sensitive instruments, based on expectations of future market conditions. These activities constitute the proprietary trading business and are conducted by the Corporation to provide customers with securities inventory and liquidity. Securities, Trading instruments are recognized at fair value, with changes resulting from fluctuations in market prices, interest rates or exchange rates reported in current period income. Further information on the Corporation’s risk management and trading activities is included in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements. 55 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT that offset the risk assumed. This portfolio was composed of the following at December 31, 2010: Table - Trading Portfolio (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage-backed securities Collateralized mortgage obligations Commercial paper Puerto Rico and U.S. Government obligations Interest-only strips Other Total * Not on a taxable equivalent basis. Weighted Average Yield* 4.87% 4.75 1.00 Amount $493,044 3,515 12,408 17,275 1,180 19,291 5.90 18.75 5.06 $546,713 4.85% The level of market risk assumed by trading activities at some subsidiaries of the Corporation is subject to limits, such as those measured by its 5-day value-at-risk (“VAR”) with a confidence level of 99%. The VAR measures the maximum estimated loss that may occur over a 5-day holding period in the course of its risk taking activities with 99% confidence. Its purpose is to estimate the amount of capital needed to absorb potential losses from adverse market volatility. Additionally, inventory position limits for selected business units are used to manage our exposure to market risk. the trading portfolio of At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had a 5-day value at risk (VAR) of approximately $2.2 million, assuming a confidence level of 99%. There are numerous assumptions and estimates associated with VAR modeling, from these assumptions and estimates. Backtesting is performed to compare actual results against maximum estimated losses, in order to evaluate model and assumptions accuracy. could differ and actual results The Corporation enters into forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities with terms lasting less than three months, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. These contracts are recognized at fair value with changes directly reported in current period income. Refer to the Derivatives section that follows in this MD&A for additional information. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of these forward contracts was not significant. Derivatives Derivatives are used by the Corporation as part of its overall interest rate risk management strategy to protect against changes in net interest income and cash flows caused by fluctuations in interest rates. Derivative instruments that the Corporation may use include, among others, interest rate swaps and caps, indexed options, and forward contracts. The Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments in its interest rate risk management strategy. The Corporation has entered into interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and foreign exchange contracts for is the benefit of commercial banking customers. Credit risk embedded in these transactions reduced by requiring appropriate collateral levels from counterparties and entering into netting agreements whenever possible. All outstanding derivatives are recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of condition at their fair value. Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Corporation’s involvement in derivative instruments and hedging activities. During 2009, management enhanced credit and collateral requirements for commercial customers entering into new interest rate swaps due to the credit risk embedded in these transactions in the current economic environment, thus in these derivative reducing the Corporation’s involvement activities. The Corporation’s derivative activities are entered primarily to offset the impact of market volatility on the economic value of assets or liabilities. The net effect on the market value of potential changes in interest rates of derivatives and other financial instruments is analyzed. The effectiveness of these hedges is monitored to ascertain that the Corporation is reducing market risk as expected. Derivative transactions are generally executed with instruments with a high correlation to the hedged asset or liability. The underlying index or instrument of the derivatives used by the Corporation is selected based on its similarity to the asset or liability being hedged. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, fixed and variable interest rate hedged assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporation’s gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. Management will assess if circumstances warrant liquidating or replacing the derivatives position in the hypothetical event that high correlation is reduced. Based on the Corporation’s derivative instruments outstanding at December 31, 2010, it is not anticipated that such a scenario would have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations. as applicable under Certain derivative contracts also present credit risk and liquidity risk because the counterparties may not comply with the terms of the contract, or the collateral obtained might be illiquid or become so. The Corporation controls credit risk limits and monitoring procedures, and through approvals, through netting and collateral agreements whenever possible. Further, the master arrangements, the Corporation may obtain collateral, where appropriate, to reduce credit risk. The credit risk attributed to the counterparty’s nonperformance risk is incorporated in the fair value of the derivatives. Additionally, as required by the fair value measurements guidance, the fair value of the Corporation’s own credit standing is considered in the fair value of the derivative liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2010, inclusion of the credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net loss of $0.2 million (2009 - net loss of $4.8 million), which terms of the consisted of a loss of $0.5 million (2009 - loss of $6.8 million) resulting from the Corporation’s credit standing adjustment and a gain of $0.3 million (2009 - gain of $2.0 million) from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had $86 million (2009 - $88 million) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral posted. On the other hand, the Corporation had $3 million recognized for their obligation to return cash collateral received at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $4 million). The Corporation performs appropriate due diligence and frequently monitors the financial condition of counterparties that represent a significant volume of credit exposure. Additionally, the Corporation has exposure limits to prevent any undue funding exposure. Cash Flow Hedges The Corporation manages the variability of cash payments due to interest rate fluctuations by the effective use of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and that are linked to specified hedged assets and liabilities. The notional amount of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2010 amounted to $256 million (2009 - $121 million). The cash flow hedges outstanding relate to forward contracts or “to be announced” (“TBA”) mortgage-backed securities that are sold and bought for future settlement to hedge mortgage-backed securities and loans prior to securitization. The seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date a specified instrument at a specified price or yield. These securities are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements for additional quantitative information on these derivative contracts. Fair Value Hedges The Corporation did not have any derivatives designated as fair value hedges during December 31, 2010 and 2009. Trading and Non-Hedging Derivative Activities The Corporation enters into derivative positions based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments and markets mostly to economically hedge a related asset or liability. The Corporation also enters into various derivatives to provide these types of derivative products to customers. These free-standing derivatives are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as part of the results of operations for the period. Following is a description of the most significant of the Corporation’s derivative activities that are not designated for hedge accounting. Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements for additional quantitative and qualitative information on these derivative instruments. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had outstanding $1.6 billion (2009 - $2.0 billion) in notional amount of interest rate swap agreements with a net negative fair value of 56 $5 million (2009 — net negative fair value of $4 million), which were not designated as accounting hedges. These swaps were entered in the Corporation’s capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and their offsetting swap position. interest For the year ended December 31, 2010, the impact of the rate swaps not designated as mark-to-market of accounting hedges was in earnings of approximately $0.3 million, recorded in the other operating income category of the statement of operations, compared with an earnings reduction of approximately $6.5 million in 2009. a net decrease At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had forward contracts with a notional amount of $278 million (2009 - $165 million) and a negative fair value of $1 million (2009 - positive fair value of $1 million) not designated as accounting hedges. These forward contracts are considered derivatives and are recorded at fair value. Subsequent changes in the value of these forward contracts are recorded in the statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the impact of the mark-to-market of the forward contracts not designated as accounting hedges was a reduction to non-interest income of $15.8 million, which was included in the category of in the consolidated statement of operations. In 2009, the unfavorable impact in non-interest income was of $12.5 million. trading account profit subsidiary. At December 31, 2010, Furthermore, the Corporation has over-the-counter option contracts which are utilized in order to limit the Corporation’s exposure on customer deposits with returns tied to the S&P 500 or to certain other equity securities or commodity indexes. The Corporation, through its Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, BPPR, offers certificates of deposit with returns linked to these indexes to its retail customers, principally in connection with IRA accounts, and certificates of deposit sold through its broker- these deposits dealer amounted to $73 million (2009 - $84 million), or less than 1% (2009 - less than 1%) of the Corporation’s total deposits. In these certificates, the customer’s principal is guaranteed by BPPR and insured by the FDIC to the maximum extent permitted by law. The instruments pay a return based on the increase of these indexes, as applicable, during the term of the instrument. Accordingly, this product gives customers the opportunity to invest in a product that protects the principal invested but allows the customer the potential to earn a return based on the performance of the indexes. The risk of issuing certificates of deposit with returns tied to the applicable indexes is hedged by BPPR. BPPR purchases indexed options from financial institutions with strong credit standings, whose return is designed to match the return payable on the certificates of deposit issued by BPPR. By hedging the risk in this manner, the effective cost of the deposits raised by this product is fixed. The contracts have a maturity and an index equal to the terms of the pool of client’s deposits they are economically hedging. 57 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The purchased option contracts are initially accounted for at cost (i.e., amount of premium paid) and recorded as a derivative asset. The derivative asset is marked-to-market on a quarterly basis with changes in fair value charged to earnings. The deposits are hybrid instruments containing embedded options that must be bifurcated in accordance with the derivatives and hedging activities guidance. The initial value of the embedded option (component of the deposit contract that pays a return based on changes in the applicable indexes) is bifurcated from the related certificate of deposit and is initially recorded as a derivative liability and a corresponding discount on the certificate of deposit is recorded. Subsequently, the discount on the deposit is accreted and included as part of interest expense while the bifurcated option is marked-to-market with changes in fair value charged to earnings. The purchased indexed options are used to economically hedge the bifurcated embedded option. These option contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and therefore cannot be designated as accounting hedges. At December 31, 2010, the notional indexed options on deposits approximated $77 million (2009 - $111 million) with a fair value of $8 million (asset) (2009 - $7 million) while the embedded options had a notional value of $73 million (2009 - $84 million) with a fair value of $7 million (liability) (2009 - $5 million). amount of the Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of other non-hedging derivative activities utilized by the Corporation during 2010 and 2009. FDIC-assisted transaction The Corporation’s total assets increased significantly from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 primarily because the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted of the transaction will transaction. Management believes that improve the Corporation’s net income, as it will interest generate more interest earned on the acquired loans than it will pay in interest on deposits and borrowings related to the acquisition with limited exceptions. The loans were initially recorded at estimated fair values. The estimated fair values of acquired loans on the acquisition date reflect an estimate of expected losses related to these assets. As a result, operating losses may be affected if loan losses exceed the losses reflected in the fair value of these assets at the acquisition date. In addition, to the extent that the stated interest rate on the acquired covered loans was not considered a market rate of interest at the acquisition date, appropriate adjustments to the acquisition- date fair value were recorded. These adjustments mitigate the risk associated with the acquisition of loans earning a below- market rate of return. As expressed in the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A, most of the covered loans will have an accretable yield. The accretable yield is the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value. The accretable yield includes the future collected. These interest expected to be collected over the remaining life of the acquired loans and the purchase premium or discount. The remaining life includes the effects of estimated prepayments, expected credit losses and adjustments to market liquidity and prevailing interest rates at acquisition date. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation is required to periodically evaluate its estimate of cash flows evaluations, performed expected to be quarterly, will require the continued usage of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Given the current economic environment, management must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows for those covered loans given the impact of home price and property value changes, changing loss severities and prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows will generally result in a charge to the provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. Increases in the expected cash flows will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans. As indicated in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction section in this MD&A, the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC is recognized at fair value and added $42.6 million to non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010. The option to exercise the equity appreciation instrument by the the equity FDIC expires in May 2011. The fair value of appreciation instrument is estimated by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and the the its projected Corporation’s current common stock price, volatility and the remaining maturity of the instrument. largely on variations of value depends from operations Foreign Exchange The Corporation holds interests in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (“CONTADO”) and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. (“BHD”) in the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these businesses are conducted in the country’s foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency for which the translation adjustment, functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, is reported in accumulated other comprehensive in the consolidated statements of condition, except for highly- inflationary environments in which the effects would be included in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had approximately $36 million in an unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), compared to an unfavorable adjustment of $41 million at December 31, 2009 and $39 million at December 31, 2008. income (loss) Popular, Inc. also operates in Venezuela through its wholly- owned subsidiary Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A., formerly EVERTEC VENEZUELA, C.A. (“Red Tranred”). On January 7, 2010, Venezuela’s National Consumer Price Index (“NCPI”) for December 2009 was released. The cumulative three-year inflation rates for both of Venezuela’s inflation indices were over 100 percent. The Corporation began considering Venezuela’s economy as highly inflationary as of January 1, 2010, and the financial statements of Red Tranred were remeasured as if the functional currency was the reporting currency as of such date. ASC Paragraph 830-10-45-11 defines a highly inflationary economy as one with a cumulative inflation rate of approximately 100 percent or more over a three-year period. Under ASC Topic 830, if a country’s economy is classified as highly inflationary, the functional currency of the foreign entity operating in that country must be remeasured to the functional currency of the reporting entity. The unfavorable impact of remeasuring the financial statements of Red Tranred at December 31, 2010, was approximately $1.9 million. Total assets for Red Tranred remeasured approximated $8.9 million at December 31, 2010. Liquidity The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. An institution’s liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is also exposed to liquidity risk if the markets on which it depends are subject to occasional disruptions. The Board is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s tolerance for liquidity risk, including approving relevant risk limits and policies. The Board has delegated the monitoring of these risks to the RMC and the ALCO. In addition to the risk management activities of ALCO, Popular has a Market Risk Management function that provides independent oversight of market and liquidity risk activities. The management of liquidity risk, on long-term and day-to-day basis, is the responsibility of the Corporate Treasury Division. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasurer is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and for monitoring the liquidity position on an ongoing basis. Also, the Corporate Treasury Division coordinates liquidity management strategies and activities with the reportable segments, oversees policy breaches and manages the escalation process. corporate wide The Corporation obtains liquidity from both sides of the balance sheet as well as from off-balance-sheet activities. Liquid assets can be quickly and easily converted to cash at a reasonable cost, or are timed to mature when management anticipates a need for additional liquidity. The Corporation’s investment portfolio, investments such as deposits with correspondent banks, and securities not including money market 58 pledged to other counterparties in the repo market, and loans that can be pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) are liquidity needs. The used to manage the Corporation’s also had established subsidiaries Corporation’s banking collateralized borrowing facilities at the Discount Window with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“Fed”) that can be used under stress scenarios. On the liability side, diversified sources of deposits and secured credit facilities provide liquidity to Popular’s operations. Even if some of these alternatives may not be available temporarily, it is expected that in the normal course of business, the Corporation’s funding sources are adequate. Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed. The Corporation has a significant amount of assets available for raising funds through these channels. Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits, continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 69% of the Corporation’s total assets at December 31, 2010 and 75% at December 31, 2009. The decrease in the ratio of deposits to total assets from the end of 2009 to December 31, 2010 was directly related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. As shown in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction section of this MD&A, the acquired loans (book value prior to purchase accounting adjustments) exceeded substantially the assumed liabilities, and as such, the Corporation funded the acquisition by issuing a note to the FDIC. The FDIC retained substantially all of Westernbank’s brokered certificates of deposit, which for the former Westernbank entity represented a major funding source for its earning assets. In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At December 31, 2010, these borrowings consisted primarily of the note issued to the FDIC as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, securities sold under agreement junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and term notes. The most borrowings significant composition from December 31, 2009 to the same date in 2010 is primarily related to the note issued to the FDIC, partially offset by a reduction in FHLB advances. the Corporation’s to repurchase, variance in Refer to the table Financing to Total Assets included in the Statement of Condition Analysis section of this MD&A for the different components or sources funding the Corporation’s assets. 59 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT In the past two years, the Corporation has taken steps to deleverage its balance sheet and prepay certain high cost debt to benefit its cost of funds going forward. These actions were possible in part due to the excess liquidity derived from the Corporation’s 2010 capital raise, from maturities of investment securities and funds received from the sale of the majority interest in EVERTEC. During 2010, the Corporation took the following actions: k repurchased and cancelled of $175 million in term notes with interest that adjusted in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes had an interest rate of 9.75% at the time of repurchase or repayment; k prepaid $363 million in FHLB advances; k terminated of $54 million in public certificates of deposit; and k prepaid $2.6 billion of the note issued to the FDIC as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. A summary of in the ended Corporation’s December 31, 2009, compared with the previous year, follows: significant changes year sources during the most funding the k reduction in time deposits of $1.9 billion, including a decline of $0.4 billion in brokered deposits, the impact of branch closures and branch sales in the U.S. mainland operations, and lower deposit volumes gathered through the internet platform; k repayment of $803 million in term notes during the year ended December 31, 2009; and k a existing debentures reduction in junior subordinated debentures of $410 million related to an exchange offer whereby the Corporation exchanged newly issued shares of common and an increase of stock for $424 million in junior subordinated debentures related to the new trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury (in exchange for the preferred stock originally issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP). Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Exchange Offers completed in 2009. and limits to monitor more Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies the the banking Corporation’s liquidity position and that of subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions. effectively The following sections provide further information on the Corporation’s major funding activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings and available lines of credit, including its terms, is included in Notes 18 through 21 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows. 2008 After substantial volatility and disruptions in late 2007 and 2008, the credit markets improved substantially in late mid-2009 and 2010. Disrupted market conditions prior to 2010 increased the Corporation’s liquidity risk exposure due primarily to increased risk aversion on the part of traditional credit providers, as well as the material declines in our credit ratings that occurred in 2009. The Corporation’s credit downgrades, as well as the economic conditions in the Corporation’s main market have hindered its ability to issue debt in the capital markets. During the Corporation’s and 2009, management implemented various strategies to reduce its liquidity exposure, such as substantially reducing the use of short-term and long-term unsecured borrowings, promoting customer banking channels, diversifying and increasing its contingency funding sources as well as substantially closing down the businesses of certain non-banking subsidiaries. During the past years, the Corporation was subject to various credit rating downgrades by the major rating agencies, which affected its ability to borrow funds. The Corporation has not completed recently any debt issuance in the capital markets, but did successfully complete a $1.15 billion capital raise through the issuance of common stock. traditional through deposit growth Banking Subsidiaries Primary sources of funding for the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or “the banking subsidiaries,” include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, collateralized borrowings, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the Discount Window of the Fed, and have a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2010, the BHCs made capital contributions to BPNA and BPPR amounting to $745 million and $600 million, respectively. BPNA has received capital contributions in order to ensure it maintains its well-capitalized status. The capital contribution to BPPR was done to strengthen its regulatory capital ratios upon executing the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. As indicated previously, during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, BPPR issued a note to the FDIC as part of the consideration paid in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. During 2010, BPPR prepaid $2.6 billion of the outstanding balance of the note issued to the FDIC. Funds for the repayment were principally obtained from excess liquidity maintained in cash with the Fed, and to a lesser extent, a combination of proceeds from maturities of securities, sales of investment securities with unrealized gains, and repurchase agreements. The note issued to the FDIC was selected for partial repayment because it resulted in more favorable economics for the Corporation than prepaying other of its liabilities, which entailed prepayment penalties. This FDIC obligation was also of sufficient size to permit the Corporation to deploy its excess liquidity. The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment portfolio purchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for some derivative transactions and recourse obligations; off- balance sheet activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments; advances; derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR. provisions; servicing recourse The bank operating subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings and a portion of deposits. In addition, the total loan portfolio is funded with deposits with the exception of the Westernbank acquisition which is partially funded with the note issued to the FDIC. factors, excluding for deposits, including pricing, The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully in the brokered deposits, marketplace depends on various service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the credit ratings of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporation’s banking insured subsidiaries (subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in the credit ratings. federally are Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings and their cost is less 60 sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table I for a breakdown of deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and for institutional customers. As indicated in the glossary, purposes of defining core deposits, the Corporation excludes brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled $20.6 billion, or 77% of total deposits, at December 31, 2010, compared with $19.5 billion, or 75% of total deposits, at December 31, 2009. Core deposits financed 61% of the Corporation’s earning assets at December 31, 2010, compared to 60% at December 31, 2009. Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at December 31, 2010 totaled $4.7 billion, or 17% of total deposits, compared to $4.7 billion, or 18%, at December 31, 2009. Their distribution by maturity at December 31, 2010 was as follows: Table - Certificates of Deposit by Maturities (In thousands) 3 months or less 3 to 6 months 6 to 12 months Over 12 months Total certificates of deposit $2,016,442 649,518 970,706 1,014,295 $4,650,961 At December 31, 2010, 6% of the Corporation’s assets were financed by brokered deposits. The Corporation had $2.3 billion in brokered deposits at December 31, 2010, compared with $2.7 billion at December 31, 2009. Brokered certificates of deposit, which are typically sold through an intermediary to retail investors, provide access to longer-term funds and provide the ability to raise additional funds without pressuring retail deposit pricing in the Corporation’s local markets. An unforeseen disruption in the brokered deposits market, stemming from factors such as legal, regulatory or financial risks, could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to fund a portion of the Corporation’s operations and/or meet its obligations. In the event that any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries fall under the regulatory capital ratios of a well-capitalized restrictions by the institution or are subject regulators, that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporation’s ability to effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts. to capital 61 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table M Average Total Deposits (Dollars in thousands) 2010 2009 For the Year 2008 2007 2006 Non-interest bearing demand deposits $4,732,132 $4,293,285 $4,120,280 $4,043,427 $3,969,740 Savings accounts NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand accounts Certificates of deposit: Under $100,000 $100,000 and over Certificates of deposit Other time deposits Total interest bearing deposits Total average deposits 5,970,000 5,538,077 5,600,377 5,697,509 5,440,101 4,981,332 4,804,023 4,948,186 4,429,448 3,877,678 6,099,741 4,073,047 10,172,788 7,166,756 4,214,125 11,380,881 6,955,843 4,598,146 11,553,989 794,245 811,943 1,241,447 3,949,262 5,928,983 9,878,245 1,520,471 3,768,653 4,963,534 8,732,187 1,244,426 21,918,365 22,534,924 23,343,999 21,525,673 19,294,392 $26,650,497 $26,828,209 $27,464,279 $25,569,100 $23,264,132 Average deposits, including brokered deposits, for the year ended December 31, 2010 represented 78% of average earning assets, compared with 79% and 76% for the years ended respectively. Table M December 31, 2009 and 2008, summarizes average deposits for the past five years. liquidity through core To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term for borrowings under borrowings by pledging securities repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are subject to availability of collateral. deposits, The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $0.7 billion at December 31, 2010 and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009. Such advances are collateralized by commercial and mortgage loans, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. Refer to Notes 19 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the terms of FHLB advances additional outstanding. As indicated in the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A, the Corporation extinguished $363 million of FHLB advances borrowed by BPNA during 2010. at At December 31, 2010, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity the Fed’s Discount Window of approximately $2.7 billion, which remained unused as of that date. This compares to a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of $2.9 billion at December 31, 2009, which was also unused. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of performing loans and securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to such collateral. The subsidiaries Corporation’s incurred banking $21.9 million in prepayment penalties during the year ended December 31, 2010 on the cancellation of $363 million of FHLB advances and $54 million in public fund certificates of deposit as part of BPNA’s deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a strategy to increase margin in future periods. At December 31, 2010, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and projected liquidity sources to meet its anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments, during the foreseeable future and have sufficient liquidity resources to address a stress event. in the future if Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those funds financial condition or general market conditions were to change. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. the Corporation’s financing adequate available is not if Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected. Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity Apart from the impact of the note issued to the FDIC described above, the Corporation’s liquidity may also be impacted by the loan payment performance and reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements. In the short-term, there may be a significant amount of the covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction that will experience deterioration in payment performance, or will be 62 certain Federal regulatory considerations, including guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board regarding capital and dividends. Inc., Popular North America, The Corporation’s bank holding companies (“BHCs”, Inc. and Popular Popular, International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. These sources of funding have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporation’s credit ratings together with higher credit spreads in general. The Corporation’s principal credit ratings are at a level below “investment grade” which affects the Corporation’s ability to raise funds in the capital markets. However, the cash needs of the Corporation’s non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness are now minimal given that the PFH business was discontinued. The Corporation has an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities. A principal use of liquidity at the BHCs is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized. Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary have required the BHCs to contribute equity capital to ensure that it meets the regulatory guidelines for “well-capitalized” institutions. In the event that additional capital contributions were necessary, management believes that the BHCs currently have enough liquidity resources to meet potential capital needs from BPNA in the ordinary course of business. As indicated previously, during 2009 and 2010, the BHCs made capital contributions to BPNA amounting to in order to $590 million and $745 million, respectively, maintain the banking subsidiary at well-capitalized levels. BPNA had a regulatory total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 18.87% at December 31. 2010. Other principal uses of liquidity are the payment of principal and interest on debt securities and dividends on preferred stock. Refer to Note 42 to the consolidated financial statements, which provides a statement of condition, of operations and of cash flows for the three BHCs. The loans held-in-portfolio in such associated with financial intercompany securities held-to-maturity at the parent holding company, amounting to $211 million at December 31, 2010, consisted principally of $185 million of subordinated notes from BPPR. are transactions. principally The investment statements The maturities of the bank holding companies’ outstanding notes payable at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown in the table below. These borrowings are principally unsecured senior debt (term notes) and junior subordinated debentures (trust preferred securities). determined to have inadequate collateral values to repay the loans. In such instances, the Corporation will likely no longer receive payments from the borrowers, which will impact cash flows. The loss sharing agreements will not fully offset the if a loan is financial effects of such a situation. However, subsequently the Corporation exhausts its best efforts at collection, the loss sharing agreements will cover 80% of the loss associated with the covered loans, offsetting most of any deterioration in the performance of the covered loans. or written down after charged off The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results in the long-term will be similar to the short- term effects described above. The long-term effects that we may experience will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the loss sharing agreements to make payments over time. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction and consumer loans, changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC (as part of the FDIC loss share receivable) may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporation’s normal practices. investment cash on hand, Bank Holding Companies The principal sources of funding for the holding companies securities, dividends include received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits), asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from new borrowings or stock issuances. The principal source of cash flows for the parent holding company during 2010 was the capital issuance of $1.15 billion in the second quarter of 2010, which was completed primarily to strengthen the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios in preparation for the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, and proceeds from the sale of the 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC during the third quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation received $528.6 million, net of transaction costs and taxes, from the sale of a majority interest in EVERTEC. The principal use of these funds include capitalizing its banking subsidiaries, the repayment of debt, and interest payments senior debt and trust preferred securities. The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends to common and preferred stockholders during 2009 as a result of dividend restrictions requested by regulators and in order to conserve capital. At the end of 2010, the Corporation began paying dividends once again on the Series A and B preferred stock. The preferred stock dividends amounted to $310 thousand in 2010. The Corporation’s ability to declare and pay dividends on the preferred stock is dependent on to holders of 63 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table - BHCs Notes Payable by Maturity (In millions) Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Later years No stated maturity Sub-total Less: Discount [a] Total 2010 2009 – $4 374 3 – – 440 936 $1,757 (491) $1,266 $2 354 274 3 – – 440 936 $2,009 (512) $1,497 [a] Amounts relate to junior subordinated debentures associated with the trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for information on this issuance. The reduction in the maturity of unsecured senior debt from the 2011 maturity classification was the result of three events: (1) the exercise of a put option by the holder of $75 million in term notes during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and (2) the extension of the maturity of $100 million in term notes from September 2011 to March 2012 based on modifications negotiated with the note holders during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which set a fixed interest rate of 13%, and (3) the repurchase and cancellation in July 2010 of $175 million in term notes with interest that adjusted in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes had an interest rate of 9.75% over the 3-month LIBOR with a maturity date of September 2011. The Corporation no longer has outstanding any term notes with rating triggers or in which the holders have the right to require the Corporation to purchase the notes prior to its contractual maturity. The repayment of the BHCs obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met with internal liquidity resources and new borrowings. The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the foreseeable future. Risks to Liquidity Total lines of credit outstanding are not necessarily a measure of the total credit available on a continuing basis. Some of these lines could be subject to collateral requirements, standards of creditworthiness, regulatory requirements, among other factors. Derivatives, such as those embedded in long-term repurchase transactions or interest rate swaps, and off-balance sheet exposures, such as recourse, are subject to collateral requirements. As their fair value increases, the collateral requirements may increase, thereby reducing the balance of unpledged securities. leverage ratios other and Reductions of the Corporation’s credit ratings by the rating agencies could also affect its ability to borrow funds, and could substantially raise the cost of our borrowings. Some of the Corporation’s borrowings have “rating triggers” that call for an increase in their interest rate in the event of a rating downgrade. In addition, changes in the Corporation’s ratings could lead creditors and business counterparties to raise the collateral available unpledged requirements, which could reduce securities, reducing excess liquidity. Refer to Part II - Other Information, the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information on factors that could impact liquidity. Item 1A-Risk Factors of The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that could affect its financing activities. In the case of a further decay or deepening of the economic recession in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be further affected and result in higher credit costs. Even though the U.S. economy appears to be in the initial stages of a recovery, it is not certain that the Puerto Rico economy will benefit materially from a rebound in the U.S. cycle. Puerto Rico economy faces various challenges including the persistent government deficit and a residential real estate sector under substantial pressures. for the possibility of adopted contingency plans Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the its principal markets and regulatory economic outlook of changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In such scenario, order to prepare management has raising financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds temporarily fully are unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms, such as the pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed. are usually available that for capital earnings, adequacy, Credit ratings of Popular’s debt obligations are an important factor for liquidity because they impact the Corporation’s ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources, among other factors. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s ratings were “non- investment grade” with the three major rating agencies. This may make it more difficult for the Corporation to borrow in the capital markets and at a higher cost. The Corporation’s counterparties are sensitive to the risk of a rating downgrade. In addition, the ability of the Corporation to raise new funds or renew maturing debt may be more difficult. Some of the contracts Corporation’s or senior unsecured debt counterparty subsidiaries’ its include close-out provisions if the credit ratings fall below certain levels. The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in the Corporation’s overall credit ratings. Their main funding sources are currently deposits and secured borrowings, and in the case of BPNA, capital contributions from its parent company. At the BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the non-banking lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and outstanding unsecured senior debt has been reduced. The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. The banking subsidiaries did have $18 million in deposits at December 31, 2010 that are subject to rating triggers. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had repurchase agreements amounting to $260 million that were subject the maintenance of well- capitalized regulatory capital ratios, and were collateralized with securities with a fair value of $282 million. to rating triggers or Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and credit ratings. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $67 million at December 31, 2010, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $86 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments. section of this MD&A, In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. Based on BPPR’s failure to maintain the required credit ratings, the third parties could have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in the Contractual Obligations and the Commercial Commitments Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements to secure such require the Corporation to post collateral recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations approximated $163 million at December 31, 2010. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results. 64 sources of funding for Non-banking subsidiaries the non-banking The principal subsidiaries include internally generated cash flows from operations, loan sales, repurchase agreements, borrowed funds from their direct parent companies or the holding companies. The principal uses of funds for the non-banking subsidiaries include repayment of maturing debt, operational expenses and payment of dividends to the BHCs. The liquidity needs of the non-banking subsidiaries are minimal since most of them are funded internally from operating cash flows or from intercompany borrowings from their holding companies, BPPR or BPNA. loan originations, consists portfolio primarily repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s Other Funding Sources and Capital The investment securities portfolio provides an additional source of liquidity, which may be created through either securities sales investment or securities liquid of U.S. government investment securities, sponsored U.S. agency securities, government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations that can be used to raise funds in the repo markets. At December 31, 2010, the investment and trading securities portfolios, as shown in Table L, totaled $5.9 billion, of which $1.6 billion, or 27%, had maturities of one year or less. Mortgage-related investments in Table L are presented based on expected maturities, which may differ from contractual maturities, to prepayments. The availability of the repurchase agreement to having sufficient unpledged collateral would be subject available at the time the transactions are to be consummated. The Corporation’s unpledged investment and trading securities, excluding other investment securities, amounted to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $2.6 billion at the same date in the previous year. A substantial portion of these securities could be used to raise financing quickly in the U.S. money markets or from secured lending sources. they could be subject since Additional liquidity may be provided through loan maturities, prepayments and sales. The loan portfolio can also be used to obtain funding in the capital markets. In particular, mortgage loans and some types of consumer loans, have secondary markets which the Corporation may use. The maturity distribution of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 is presented in Table L. As of that date, $10.5 billion, or 40% of the loan portfolio was expected to mature within one year, compared with $8.9 billion or 37% of the loan portfolio in the previous year. The contractual maturities of loans have been adjusted to include prepayments based on historical data and prepayment trends. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the 65 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT transaction. As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These commitments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. Other types of off-balance sheet arrangements that the Corporation enters in the ordinary course of business include derivatives, operating leases and provision of guarantees, indemnifications, and representation and warranties. Refer to the Contractual Obligations and Commercial this MD&A for a discussion of Commitments section of various off-balance sheet arrangements. Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to future purchases of products or from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the services Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchase obligations. Purchase obligations legal and binding include major contractual obligations outstanding at the end of 2010, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions. As previously indicated, the Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of condition with the fair value representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions. At December 31, 2010, the aggregate contractual cash obligations, including purchase obligations and borrowings, by maturities, were: (In millions) Certificates of deposits Repurchase agreements Other short-term borrowings Long-term debt Purchase obligations Annual rental commitments under operating leases Capital leases Total contractual cash obligations Table - Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period Less than 1 year $7,357 1,300 364 2,672 [b] 76 38 1 $11,808 1 to 3 years $2,158 124 – 578 53 72 1 $2,986 3 to 5 years $1,299 350 – 10 31 63 1 $1,754 After 5 years Total $75 639 – 886 [a] 15 203 21 $10,889 2,413 364 4,146 175 376 24 $1,839 $18,387 [a] Includes junior subordinated debentures with an aggregate liquidation amount of $936 million, net of $491 million discount. These junior subordinated debentures are perpetual (no stated maturity). [b] Outstanding balance of the note issued to the FDIC amounting to $2.5 billion at December 31, 2010 is classified in the “Less than 1 year” category. Given the nature of the note issued to the FDIC, its maturity was based on expected repayment dates and not on its April 30, 2015 contractual maturity date. The expected repayments consider the timing of expected cash inflows on the loans, OREO and claims on the loss sharing agreements that will be applied to repay the note, as well as expected prepayments to be made during 2011. Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, Popular is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in interest rates, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s liability on its pension and postretirement benefit plans amounted to $333 million, compared with $261 million at December 31, 2009. During 2011, the Corporation expects to contribute $127 million to the pension and benefit restoration plans, and $6 million to the postretirement benefit plan to fund current benefit payment requirements. Obligations to these plans are based on current and projected obligations of the plans, performance of the plan assets, if applicable, and 66 any participant contributions. Refer to Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on these plans. Management believes that the effect of the pension and postretirement plans on liquidity is not significant to the Corporation’s overall financial condition. In February 2009, BPPR’s non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans were frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals after April 30, 2009. At December 31, 2010, the liability for uncertain tax positions was $26.3 million. This liability represents an estimate of tax positions that the Corporation has taken in its tax returns which may ultimately not be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. The ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty. Under the statute of limitations, the liability for uncertain tax positions expires as follows: 2011 - $6.0 million, 2012 - $6.3 million, 2013 - $5.6 million, 2014 - $2.6 million, and 2015 - $5.8 million. As a result of examinations, the Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $12 million. The Corporation also utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporation’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporation’s actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments. The following table presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporation’s off-balance sheet lending and other activities at December 31, 2010: Table - Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities (In millions) Commitments to extend credit Commercial letters of credit Standby letters of credit Commitments to originate mortgage loans Unfunded investment obligations Total The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell, in bulk sale transactions, residential mortgage loans and SBA commercial loans subject to credit recourse or to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and warranties may to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties. example, relate, for At December 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.0 billion (2009 - $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans generally subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac residential mortgage loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the recourse provided, to the credit Amount of commitment - Expiration Period 3 to 5 years After 5 years 1 to 3 years Less than 1 year Total $5,207 13 88 40 1 $5,349 $483 – 52 7 – $542 $88 – – – 9 $97 $101 – – – – $101 $5,879 13 140 47 10 $6,089 event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. Generally, the Corporation is required to pay the claims under the credit recourse arrangements because the loans are delinquent when the claim is made, thus rebuttal activity is not significant. During 2010, the Corporation repurchased approximately $121 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. In the case of Puerto Rico, most claims are settled by repurchases of delinquent loans, the majority of which are greater than 90 days past due. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $54 million (2009 - $16 million). The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses from these credit 67 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of year Provision for recourse liability Net charge-offs Balance as of end of year 2010 2009 $15,584 53,979 (15,834) $53,729 $14,133 1,482 (31) $15,584 The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “gain (loss) on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the twelve-month period. following Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value rates, loan aging, among others. the loans characteristics When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties the regarding sold. The of Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty arrangements is not significant. The Corporation does not maintain a separate reserve for representation and warranty obligations related to the sale or securitization of mortgage loans by the Corporation’s Puerto Rico operations because historically the amount of claims and related losses have been minimal. Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA, and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $18.4 billion (2009 - $17.7 billion) in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit recourse. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At December 31, 2010, the amount of funds advanced by the Corporation under such servicing agreements was (2009 - $14 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s increased portfolio delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts. approximately $24 million experience servicing generally assumed by At December 31, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Generally, the representation and warranty arrangements are for the life of the loan unless a shorter time period is negotiated with the buyer in a settlement of the arrangement. Loans had been sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was the required to make certain representations Corporation is relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $31 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition (2009 - $33 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008. investors, the expected losses associated to E-LOAN’s On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate customary for representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loan’s funding date and the loan repurchase date, as observed in the historical loan data. The liability is estimated as follows: (1) three year average of disbursement amounts (two year historical and one year projected) are used to calculate an average quarterly amount; is (2) annualized and multiplied by the repurchase distance, which currently averages approximately three years, to determine a liability amount; and (3) the calculated reserve is compared to current claims and disbursements to evaluate adequacy. The Corporation’s success rate in clearing the claims in full or negotiating lesser payouts has been fairly consistent. On average, the Corporation avoids paying on 52% of the claims. On the remaining 48%, the Corporation either repurchases the balance in full or negotiates settlements. For the accounts where the Corporation settles, it averages paying 62% of the claim amount. In total, during the 24 month period ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation paid an average of 34% of claimed amounts. the quarterly average In the case of E-LOAN, the Corporation indemnifies the lender, repurchases the loan, or settles the claim, generally for less than the full amount. Each repurchase case is different and each lender / servicer has different requirements. The large the loans repurchased have been greater than majority of 90 days past due at the time of repurchase and are included in our non-performing loans. During 2010, E-LOAN charged-off approximately $21 million (2009 - $14 million) against this representation and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases, and indemnification or make-whole settlement / closure of certain agreements with counterparties to reduce the exposure to future claims. Make-whole events are typically defaulted cases in which the investor attempts to recover by collateral or guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered portion of the loan. Claims have been predominantly for first mortgage agency loans and principally consist of underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing documentation. The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by E-LOAN, included in the consolidated events 68 statement of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of year Provision for representations and warranties Net charge-offs / termination (settlement of indemnification agreement) Balance as of end of year 2010 2009 $33,294 18,594 $5,713 41,377 (21,229) $30,659 (13,796) $33,294 the agreements primarily During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. The sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. At December 31, 2010, include indemnification for breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding at December 31, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s reserve related to PFH’s indemnity arrangements amounted to $8 million (2009 - in the $9 million), and is consolidated statement of the Corporation recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFH’s representation and warranty arrangements amounting to approximately $2 million (2009 - $3 million). The reserve balance at December 31, 2010 contemplates historical indemnity payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligation for defaulted loans within a short-term timeframe, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations. condition. During 2010, included as other liabilities The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated to loans sold by the discontinued operations of PFH, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of period Provision for representations and warranties Net charge-offs / termination (settlement of indemnification agreement) Balance as of end of period 2010 2009 $9,405 911 $15,371 (3,633) (2,258) $8,058 (2,333) $9,405 Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and Popular, unconditionally certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.6 billion at December 31, 2010 and December 31, guarantees 69 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2009. In addition, at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for information on these trust entities. in a number of The Corporation is a defendant legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business as described in the Legal Proceedings section in Part I. Item 3 of the Form 10-K and Note 34 to the consolidated financial statements. At for management to assess the probability of an adverse outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that if the ultimate resolution of unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations. this early stage, is not possible these matters, it Refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Corporation’s contractual obligations, commercial commitments, and derivative contracts. Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality Credit risk occurs anytime funds are advanced, committed, invested or otherwise exposed. Credit risk arises primarily from the Corporation’s lending activities, as well as from other on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet credit instruments. Credit risk management is based on analyzing the creditworthiness of the borrower, the adequacy of underlying collateral given current events and conditions, and the existence and strength of any guarantor support. Business activities that expose the Corporation to credit risk should be managed within the Board’s established limits that consider factors, such as maintaining a prudent balance of risk- and business units taking across diversified risk types (compliance with regulatory guidance, considering factors such as concentrations and loan-to-value ratios), controlling the exposure to lower credit quality assets, and limiting growth in, and overall exposure to, any product or risk segment where the Corporation does not have sufficient experience and a proven ability to predict credit losses. The Corporation manages credit risk by maintaining sound underwriting standards, monitoring and evaluating loan its trends and collectability, and assessing portfolio quality, reserves and loan concentrations. Also, credit risk is mitigated by implementing and monitoring lending policies and collateral requirements, and instituting credit review procedures to ensure appropriate actions to comply with laws and regulations. The Corporation’s credit policies require prompt identification and quantification of asset quality deterioration or potential loss in order to ensure the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Included in these policies, primarily determined by the amount, type of loan and risk characteristics of the credit facility, are various approval levels and lending limit constraints, ranging from the branch or department level to those that are more collateral the Corporation centralized. When considered necessary, requires and extensions credit support commitments, which is generally in the form of real estate and personal property, cash on deposit and other highly liquid instruments. to a to and ensure proactive The Corporation’s Credit Strategy Committee (“CRESCO”) is management’s top policy-making body with respect to credit- related matters and credit strategies. CRESCO reviews the activities of each subsidiary, in the detail that it may deem appropriate, coordinated management of credit granting, credit exposures and credit procedures. CRESCO’s principal functions include reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and periodically approving appropriate provisions, monitoring compliance with charge-off policy, establishing portfolio diversification, yield and quality standards, reporting establishing credit standards, monitoring asset quality, and approving credit policies and amendments thereto for the subsidiaries and/or business lines, including special lending approval authorities when and if appropriate. The analysis of the allowance adequacy is presented to the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors for review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis. exposure independent of The Corporation also has a Corporate Credit Risk Management Division (“CCRMD”). CCRMD is a centralized unit, the lending function. The CCRMD’s functions include identifying, measuring and controlling credit risk independently from the business units, evaluating the credit risk rating system and reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and regulatory standards. CCRMD also ensures that the subsidiaries comply with the credit policies and applicable regulations, and monitors credit underwriting standards. Also, the CCRMD performs ongoing monitoring of the portfolio, including potential areas of concern for specific borrowers and/or geographic regions. the loans, The Corporation has a Credit Process Review Group within the CCRMD, which performs annual comprehensive credit process reviews of several middle markets, construction, asset- based and corporate banking lending groups in BPPR. This group evaluates the credit risk profile of each originating unit along with each unit’s credit administration effectiveness, including the assessment of the risk rating representative of the current credit quality of collateral and the documentation. The monitoring performed by this group contributes to assess compliance with credit policies and underwriting standards, determine the current level of credit risk, evaluate the effectiveness of the credit management process and identify control deficiencies that may arise in the credit- granting process. Based on its findings, the Credit Process Review Group recommends corrective actions, if necessary, that help in maintaining a sound credit process. CCRMD has contracted an outside loan review firm to perform the credit process reviews for evaluation of the portfolios of commercial and construction loans in the U.S. mainland operations. The CCRMD participates in defining the review plan with the outside loan review firm and actively participates in the discussions of the results of the loan reviews with the business units. The CCRMD may periodically review the work performed by the outside loan review firm. CCRMD reports the results of the credit process reviews to the Risk Management Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. The Corporation has specialized workout officers that handle substantially all commercial loans which are past due 90 days and over, borrowers which have filed bankruptcy, or those that are considered problem loans based on their risk profile. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s credit exposure was loan portfolio, which assets. The portfolio centered in its $26.5 billion total represented 79% of earning composition for the last five years is presented in Table H. its The Corporation issues certain credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit to meet the financing needs of its customers. For these financial instruments, the contract amount represents the credit risk associated with failure of the counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract and the decline in value of the underlying collateral. The credit risk associated with these financial instruments varies depending on the counterparty’s creditworthiness and the value of any collateral held. Refer to Note 34 to the consolidated financial statements and to the Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section of this MD&A for the Corporation’s involvement in these credit-related activities. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $5 million for potential losses associated with unfunded held-in-portfolio loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit unrelated to the acquired lending relationships from the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction. This reserve compares to $15 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in the reserve for unfunded commitments from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was primarily related to decreasing trends in funding rates in BPPR’s and BPNA’s commercial portfolios, and E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit, coupled with the reclassifications of loans held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale during the fourth quarter of 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation also maintained $10 million for potential losses associated with unfunded held-for-sale loan commitments, mainly related to expected disbursements as held-for-sale. The estimated reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under losses methodology. These reserves for unfunded exposures remain separate and distinct from the allowance for loan losses and the Corporation’s construction reclassified allowance loans loan for of 70 are reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition. At December 31, 2010, the commitments to extend credit related to the Westernbank acquired lending relationships approximated $114 million. The acquired commitments to extend credit are covered under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, subject to FDIC approvals, above certain limits, limitations on the timing for such disbursements, and servicing guidelines, among various considerations. As indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, the Corporation recorded a contingent liability for such commitments at fair value. At liability amounted to that contingent December 31, 2010, $6 million and is recorded as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition. The Corporation is also exposed to credit risk by using derivative instruments but manages the level of risk by only dealing with counterparties of good credit standing, entering into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtaining collateral. Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Corporation’s involvement in derivative instruments and hedging activities. Also, you may refer to the Derivatives section included under Risk Management in this MD&A. The Corporation may also encounter risk of default in relation to its investment securities portfolio. Refer to Notes 8 and 9 for the composition of the investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity. The investment securities portfolio held by the Corporation at December 31, 2010 are mostly obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury securities. The vast majority of these securities are rated the equivalent of AAA by the major rating agencies. A substantial portion of these instruments are guaranteed by mortgages, a U.S. government sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The Corporation’s credit risk exposure is spread among individual consumers, small and medium businesses, as well as corporate borrowers engaged in a wide variety of industries. Only 218 of these commercial lending relationships have credit relations with an aggregate exposure of $10 million or more. At December 31, 2010, highly leveraged transactions and credit facilities to finance real estate ventures or business acquisitions amounted to $76 million, and there are no loans to less developed countries. The Corporation limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk by the nature of its lending limits. The Corporation has a significant portfolio in construction and commercial loans, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, may have less collateral coverage, higher concentrated risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic 71 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT downturns. Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in the housing markets and have increased the possibility that additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the Corporation’s current nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of, if foreclosed. The housing market in the U.S. is undergoing a correction of historic proportions. After a period of several years of booming housing markets, fueled by liberal credit conditions and rapidly rising property values, since early 2007 the sector has been in the midst of a substantial dislocation. This dislocation has had a significant impact on some of the Corporation’s U.S.-based business segments and has affected its ongoing financial results and condition. The general level of property values in the U.S., as measured by several indexes widely followed by the market, has declined significantly. These declines are the result of ongoing market adjustments that are aligning property values with income levels and home inventories. The supply of homes in the market increased substantially, and property value decreases were required to clear the overhang of excess inventory in the U.S. market. Recent indicators suggest that after a material price correction, the U.S. real estate market may be entering a period of relative stability. Nonetheless, further declines in property values could impact the Corporation’s credit quality of U.S. mortgage loan portfolio because the value of the homes underlying the loans is a primary source of repayment in the event of foreclosure. In the event of foreclosure in a loan from this portfolio, the current market value of the underlying collateral could be insufficient to cover the loan amount owed. the The level of real estate prices in Puerto Rico had been more stable than in other U.S. markets, but the current economic environment has accelerated the devaluation of properties when compared with previous periods. Also, additional economic weakness in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland could further pressure residential property values. Lower real estate values could increase the provision for loan losses, loan delinquencies, foreclosures and the cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate collateral. The higher end of the housing market in Puerto Rico appears to have suffered a substantial slowdown in sales activity in recent quarters, as reflected in the low absorption rates of projects financed in the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio. As indicated previously in this MD&A, during 2008, management executed a series of actions to mitigate its credit risk exposure in the U.S. mainland. These actions included the discontinuance of PFH. Also, the Corporation exited the lending business of E-LOAN which also faced high credit losses, particularly in its HELOC and closed-end second mortgage portfolios. In the case of the banking operations, during 2009, the Corporation executed a plan to close, consolidate or sell underperforming branches and exit lending businesses that do not generate deposits or fee income. The Corporation has significantly curtailed the production of non-traditional mortgages as it ceased originating non-conventional mortgage loans in its U.S. mainland operations. This initiative was part of the BPNA Restructuring Plan implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008. The non-conventional mortgage unit is currently focused on servicing the run-off portfolio and restructuring In loans that have or show signs of credit deterioration. addition, as part of the credit actions taken during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Corporation reclassified to loans held-for-sale a significant portion of delinquent loans related to this portfolio. Management continues to refine the Corporation’s credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. The Corporation has adjusted its underwriting criteria, as well as enhanced its line management and collection strategies, in an attempt to mitigate losses. The commercial banking group restructured and strengthened several areas to manage more effectively the current scenario, focusing strategies on critical steps in the origination and portfolio management processes to ensure the quality of incoming loans as well as to detect and manage potential problem loans early. The consumer lending area also tightened the underwriting standards across all business lines and reduced its exposure in areas that are more likely to be impacted under the current economic conditions. Geographical and Government Risk The Corporation is exposed to geographical and government risk. The Corporation’s assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business segment reporting are presented in Note 39 to the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of the Corporation’s financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico. Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy has been experiencing recessionary conditions. Based on information published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board (the “Planning Board”), the Puerto Rico real gross national product decreased an estimated 3.6% during fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The unemployment rate in Puerto Rico has remained high at 16%, at August 2010. The Puerto Rico economy continues to be challenged, primarily, by a housing remains under pressure, contraction in the sector that constrains manufacturing sector and a fiscal deficit government spending. that into effect The government recently enacted a housing-incentive law temporary measures, effective from that puts that seek to September 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, stimulate demand for housing and reduce the significant include excess reductions tax exemption on rental income from new properties for 10 years, exemption on long-term capital gain tax in future sale of new properties and no property taxes for five years on new housing, among others. supply of new homes. The and government incentives closing in taxes fees, Several major projects are under consideration by the Puerto Rico Government in areas such as energy and road infrastructure. These are to be structured as public and private partnerships and are expected to generate economic activity as they are awarded and construction commences. There are also various hotel projects under development. Another positive factor is the remaining disbursements under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), of which $3.2 billion or close to 48% had been disbursed at June 30, 2010. The Puerto Rican economy is still vulnerable, but the government has made progress in addressing the budget deficit while the banking sector has been substantially recapitalized and consolidated through FDIC-assisted transactions. The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in the Corporation’s loan originations; deterioration in the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolios as reflected in high levels of non-performing assets, loan loss provisions and charge-offs, particularly in the Corporation’s construction and commercial loan portfolios; an increase in the rate of foreclosures on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value of the Corporation’s loans and loan servicing portfolio, all of which have adversely affected its profitability. The persistent economic slowdown could cause those adverse effects to continue, as delinquency rates may increase in the short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in the Corporation’s other interest and non-interest revenues. its and political subdivisions, At December 31, 2010 the Corporation had $1.4 billion of credit facilities granted to or guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government of which $199 million were uncommitted lines of credit. Of these total facilities granted, $1.1 billion were outstanding at credit December 31, 2010. A substantial portion of the Corporation’s credit exposure to the Government of Puerto Rico is either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. Another portion of these loans consists of special obligations of various municipalities that are payable from the basic real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities. 72 Furthermore, at December 31, 2010, the Corporation had outstanding $145 million in obligations of Puerto Rico, States and Political Subdivisions as part of its investment securities portfolio. Refer to Notes 8 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of that total, $140 million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its municipalities. The Corporation continues to closely monitor the political and economic situation of the Island and evaluates the portfolio for any declines in value that management may consider being other-than-temporary. securities represented As further detailed in Notes 8 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial portion of the Corporation’s the investment U.S. Government in the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae. In and of addition, $273 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies at December 31, 2010. residential mortgages $673 million exposure to Non-Performing Assets Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest, renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table N. The Corporation’s non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are as follows: k Commercial and construction loans - recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the case of collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed as uncollectible) is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event not later than the quarter following the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. k Lease financing - recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. k Mortgage interest loans - recognition of income on mortgage loans is generally discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. k Consumer loans - recognition of interest income on closed- end consumer loans and home-equity lines of credit is 73 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. k Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) - loans classified as TDRs are reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments six months of sustained performance after classified as a TDR). least (at Acquired covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction that are restructured after acquisition are not considered restructured loans for purposes of the Corporation’s accounting and disclosure if the loans are accounted for in pools pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30. k As previously indicated in this MD&A and notes to the accompanying financial statements, covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Also, the non- accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded losses exceed the purchase only to the extent accounting estimates. loans charged-off against that k Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income using the effective yield method over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for that under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. due in Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across quarters or year-to-date periods. Given the significant amount of covered loans that are past due but still accruing due to the accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) would result in a significant distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for portfolios that have significant amounts of covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across quarters or years, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios impacted by acquisition accounting. The that were not Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator provides better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio. by total secured At December 31, 2010, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $811 million of estate loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, in the Puerto Rico operations and $404 million in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $1.3 billion in the Puerto Rico operations and $697 million in the U.S. mainland operations at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, these figures were $704 million in Puerto Rico and $338 million in the U.S. mainland operations. real In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table N, at December 31, 2010, there were $111 million of performing loans, excluding covered loans, which in management’s opinion are currently subject to potential future classification as non- performing and are considered impaired, compared with $248 million at December 31, 2009, and $206 million in the U.S. mainland operations. Table N Non-Performing Assets (Dollars in thousands) Non-accrual loans: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Total non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans Non-performing loans held-for-sale Other real estate owned (“OREO”), excluding covered OREO Total non-performing assets, excluding covered assets Covered loans and OREO [2] Total non-performing assets 74 As of December 31, 2010 2009 2008 [1] 2007 2006 $725,027 238,554 5,937 542,033 60,302 1,571,853 671,757 161,496 $836,728 854,937 9,655 510,847 64,185 2,276,352 – 125,483 $464,802 319,438 11,345 338,961 68,263 1,202,809 – 89,721 $266,790 95,229 10,182 349,381 49,090 770,672 – 81,410 $158,214 – 11,898 499,402 48,074 717,588 – 84,816 $2,405,106 83,539 $2,401,835 – $1,292,530 – $852,082 – $802,404 – $2,488,645 $2,401,835 $1,292,530 $852,082 $802,404 Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more $338,359 $239,559 $150,545 $109,569 $99,996 Excluding covered loans and covered OREO: Non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio Non-performing assets to total assets Including covered loans and covered OREO: Non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio Non-performing assets to total assets Interest lost 7.58% 7.11 9.60% 6.91 4.67% 3.32 2.75% 1.92 2.24% 1.69 6.25 6.43 $75,684 9.60 6.91 $59,982 4.67 3.32 $48,707 2.75 1.92 $71,037 2.24 1.69 $58,223 [1] Amounts at December 31, 2008 exclude assets from discontinued operations. Non-performing loans and other real estate from discontinued operations amounted to $3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. [2] The amount consists of $26 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $58 million in covered OREO. It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses. Another key measure used to evaluate and monitor the Corporation’s asset quality is loan delinquencies. Loans delinquent 30 days or more and delinquencies as a percentage of their related portfolio category at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented below. Table - Loan Delinquencies (Dollars in millions) Loans delinquent 30 days or more* Total delinquencies as a percentage of total loans: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Covered loans accounted for under ASC subtopic 310-30 Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 Total 2010 2009 $4,657 $3,685 9.09% 10.17% 75.58 3.35 27.50 5.72 57.72 4.49 23.96 6.09 28.32 – 16.00 17.60% 15.48% – * Note: Loans delinquent 30 days or more include $676.4 million in loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2010 ($5.3 million – December 31, 2009). Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are composed primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own they have the option to assets the defaulted loans that purchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial the Corporation has institutions that, although delinquent, received timely payment from the sellers / servicers, and, in some recourse agreements. instances, have partial guarantees under Refer to Table O for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the past 5 years. 75 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Table O Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics (Dollars in thousands) Balance at beginning of year Allowance acquired Provision for loan losses Charge-offs: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Recoveries: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Net loans charged-off: Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 $1,261,204 – 1,011,880 $882,807 – 1,405,807 $548,832 – 991,384 $522,232 7,290 341,219 $461,707 – 187,556 2,273,084 2,288,614 1,540,216 870,741 649,263 476,499 405,418 15,377 99,835 252,227 290,547 311,311 22,281 124,781 347,027 1,249,356 1,095,947 38,203 10,431 4,950 5,056 38,064 96,704 438,296 394,987 10,427 94,779 214,163 27,281 1,386 4,799 4,175 30,896 68,537 263,266 309,925 17,482 120,606 316,131 1,152,652 1,027,410 184,578 120,425 22,761 53,303 264,437 645,504 15,167 – 3,934 425 26,014 45,540 169,411 120,425 18,827 52,878 238,423 599,964 12,430 (45,015) 94,992 – 23,722 15,889 173,937 308,540 18,280 1,606 8,695 421 28,902 57,904 76,712 (1,606) 15,027 15,468 145,035 54,724 – 24,526 4,465 125,350 209,065 17,195 22 10,643 526 27,327 55,713 37,529 (22) 13,883 3,939 98,023 250,636 153,352 – (71,273) – 26,321 Write-downs related to loans transferred to loans held-for-sale Change in allowance for loan losses from discontinued operations [1] 327,207 – – – Balance at end of year $793,225 $1,261,204 $882,807 $548,832 $522,232 Loans held-in-portfolio excluding covered loans: Outstanding at year end Average Loans held-in-portfolio including covered loans: Outstanding at year end Average Excluding covered loans and covered OREO: Allowance for loan losses to year end loans held-in-portfolio Recoveries to charge-offs Net charge-offs to average loans held-in- portfolio Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs Provision for loan losses to: Net charge-offs Average loans held-in-portfolio Allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio Including covered loans and covered OREO: Allowance for loan losses to year end loans held-in-portfolio Recoveries to charge-offs Net charge-offs average loans held-in-portfolio Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs Provision for loan losses to: Net charge-offs Average loans held-in-portfolio Allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio $20,728,035 22,376,612 $23,713,113 24,650,071 $25,732,873 26,162,786 $28,021,456 24,908,943 $32,017,017 23,533,341 $25,564,917 25,741,544 $23,713,113 24,650,071 $25,732,873 26,162,786 $28,021,456 24,908,943 $32,017,017 23,533,341 3.83% 7.74 5.15 0.69 0.88 4.52% 50.46 3.10% 7.74 4.48 0.69x 0.88 3.93% 49.64 5.32% 6.25 4.17 1.23 1.37 5.70% 55.40 5.32% 6.25 4.17 1.23x 1.37 5.70% 55.40 3.43% 7.05 2.29 1.47 1.65 3.79% 73.40 3.43% 7.05 2.29 1.47x 1.65 3.79% 73.40 1.96% 18.77 1.01 2.19 1.36 1.37% 71.21 1.96% 18.77 1.01 2.19x 1.36 1.37% 71.21 1.63% 26.65 0.65 3.41 1.22 0.80% 72.78 1.63% 26.65 0.65 3.41x 1.22 0.80% 72.78 [1] A positive amount represents higher provision for loan losses recorded during the period compared to net charge-offs, and vice versa for a negative amount. 76 The following table presents net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”) by loan category for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008: Table - Net charge-Offs to Average Loans HIP Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Total 2008 2010 2009 3.69% 2.00% 1.24% 15.30 27.12 2.46 1.66 2.75 2.08 7.28 5.56 5.81 1.72 1.17 4.95 5.15% 4.17% 2.29% Commercial loans As shown in Table N, the level of non-performing commercial loans held-in portfolio at December 31, 2010, compared to December 31, 2009, decreased on a consolidated basis by $112 million, mostly related to the BPNA reportable segment. Compared to December 31, 2009, the percentage of non- performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 declined from 6.6% to 6.4%. These decreases were mainly attributed to the reclassification to loans held-for-sale of commercial real estate loans in the Puerto Rico operations, combined with charge-offs of in the impaired amounts of collateral dependent the U.S. mainland. During the fourth quarter of 2010, loans level of in non-performing the Corporation decided to promptly charge-off previously reserved impaired amounts related to collateral dependent loans at both reportable segments. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the charge-offs associated to collateral dependent commercial loans amounted to approximately $71.5 million and $36.6 million in the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments, respectively. The percentage of non- performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 3.4%. The loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 remained high due to continued weak economic conditions. The level of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio in the United States operations has reflected certain signs of stabilization from December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, additions to commercial loans in non-performing status at BPPR (excluding commercial lines of credit and business credit cards) and BPNA reportable segments amounted to $396 million and $343 million, respectively, a decrease of $124 million and $79 million, respectively, when compared to 2009. Although significantly lower than in 2009, the level of new non-performing commercial loans continues to be highly driven by the current economic conditions at both markets, principally in Puerto Rico. commercial operations Puerto Rico The table that follows provides information on commercial non-performing loans at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 and net charge-offs information for the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments. (Dollars in thousands) BPPR Reportable Segment: Non-performing commercial loans Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP, both excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale Commercial loan net charge-offs Commercial loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average commercial For the years ended December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 $485,469 $516,184 $325,879 7.26% $231,133 7.25% $124,494 4.35% $123,843 loans HIP, excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale 3.39% 1.69% 1.60% BPNA Reportable Segment: Non-performing commercial loans Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale Commercial loan net charge-offs Commercial loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average commercial $239,558 $320,477 $138,923 5.12% $207,163 5.79% $138,772 2.26% $45,529 loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale 4.10% 2.38% 0.76% There was 1 commercial loan relationship greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with an outstanding balance of $10 million at December 31, 2010, compared with 5 commercial loan relationships with an outstanding debt of approximately $100 million at December 31, 2009, and 2 commercial loan relationships with an outstanding debt of approximately $31 million at December 31, 2008. The commercial loan net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased at both reportable segments when compared with the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in the BPPR reportable segment was principally due to that has resulted in lower the recessionary environment absorption rates and pressure in real estate values. The commercial loan portfolio in Puerto Rico continues to reflect high delinquencies and reductions in the value of the underlying 77 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT collateral. The increase in the commercial loan net charge-offs at the BPNA reportable segment was mostly related to commercial real estate. As previously explained, the commercial loan net charge-offs for both reportable segments include the charge-offs associated to collateral dependent commercial loans recorded during the fourth quarter of 2010. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to commercial loans held-in-portfolio represented 4.06% of that portfolio, excluding covered loans, at December 31, 2010, compared with 3.46% at December 31, 2009 and 2.16% in 2008. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the commercial loan category was 63.78% at December 31, 2010, compared with 52.31% at December 31, 2009 and 63.39% in 2008. The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (“CRE”), excluding construction and covered loans, amounted to $7.0 billion at December 31, 2010, of which $3.1 billion was secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $7.5 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2008, the Corporation’s CRE portfolio, excluding construction loans, amounted to $7.5 billion, of which $3.5 billion was secured with owner occupied properties. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered loans amounted to $553 million at December 31, 2010, compared to $557 million and $290 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The CRE non- performing loans ratios for the Corporation’s Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations were 9.61% and 5.79%, respectively, at December 31, 2010, compared with 8.29% and 6.39%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. These figures amounted to 5.85% and 1.64%, respectively, at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, included a total of $155 million of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $3 million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were considered TDRs since they involved granting a concession to borrowers under financial difficulties. The loan TDRs outstanding commitments for these commercial amounted to $1 million in the BPPR reportable segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA reportable segment at December 31, 2010. The commercial loan TDRs in non- performing status for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments at December 31, 2010 amounted to $78 million and $3 million, respectively. The commercial loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $4 million for the BPPR reportable segment and no specific reserves for the BPNA reportable segment at December 31, 2010. The impaired portions of collateral dependent commercial loan TDRs were charged-off during the fourth quarter of 2010. Construction loans Non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio significantly decreased from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 mainly attributed to the reclassification to loans held-for-sale in the Puerto Rico operations. The construction loans portfolio was also impacted by the charge-offs of impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland, as previously explained. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased from 49.58% at December 31, 2009 to 47.63% at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2008 this ratio was 14.44%. At December 31, 2010, additions to construction non- performing loans at the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments amounted to $207 million and $142 million, respectively, a decrease of $623 million and $234 million, respectively, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. These decreases were primarily attributed to the recessionary conditions of the Puerto Rico and the United States economies in 2009, driven by housing value declines, slowdown in consumer spending, and the turmoil in the global financial markets. There were 7 construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status with an outstanding balance of $99 million at December 31, 2010, compared with 22 construction loan relationships with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $544 million at December 31, 2009, and 6 construction loan relationships with an outstanding balance of $152 million at December 31, 2008. The construction loan portfolio is considered one of the high-risk portfolios of the Corporation as it continues to be adversely impacted by weak economic and real estate market conditions, particularly in Puerto Rico. 31, year 2010, compared with the Construction loans net charge-offs for the year ended December ended December 31, 2009, increased by $93.4 million in the BPPR reportable segment, and decreased by $8.3 million in the BPNA reportable segment. The increase in the BPPR reportable segment is mainly attributed to residential real estate construction projects, which have been adversely impacted by general market conditions, decreases in property values, oversupply in certain areas, and reduced absorption rates. At the BPNA the decline in construction loan net reportable segment, charge-offs was prompted by certain stabilization observed in the U.S. real estate market. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Corporation decided to promptly charge-off impaired amounts of collateral dependent loans. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the charge-offs associated to collateral dependent construction loans amounted to approximately $81.4 million and $19.9 million in the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments, respectively. These impaired amounts were fully reserved in prior periods. Management has identified construction loans considered impaired and has established specific reserves based on the loan losses value of corresponding to construction loans, represented 9.53% of that portfolio, excluding covered loans, at December 31, 2010, compared with 19.79% at December 31, 2009, and 7.70% at the collateral. The allowance for 78 December 31, 2008. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio in the construction loans category was 20.01% at December 31, 2010, compared with 39.92% and 53.32% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The BPPR reportable segment’s construction loan portfolio, excluding covered loans, totaled $168 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009. The significant decrease in the ratio of non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio to construction loans held-in-portfolio, The allowance for excluding covered loans, was primarily attributed to the reclassification to loans held-for-sale, mostly of non-accruing loans, coupled with the net charge-offs activity in this portfolio. loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment totaled construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at December 31, 2010 compared to $215 million or 19.86%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. $16 million or 9.55% of The table that follows provides information on construction non-performing loans at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 and net charge-offs information for the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 for the BPPR reportable segment. (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 For the years ended BPPR Reportable Segment: Non-performing construction loans Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP, both excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale Construction loan net charge-offs Construction loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average construction $64,678 $604,610 $215,476 38.42% $289,150 55.86% $195,769 15.02% $63,994 loans HIP, excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale 30.41% 14.96% 4.83% The BPNA reportable segment construction loan portfolio totaled $332 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $642 million at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment totaled $32 million or 9.52% of construction loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 compared to $126 million or 19.67%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The reduction in reserve levels was mainly prompted by the charge-offs of the impaired portions of collateral dependent construction loans. The table that follows provides the credit quality information for the BPNA reportable segment’s construction loan portfolio. (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 For the years ended BPNA Reportable Segment: Non-performing construction loans Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale Construction loan net charge-offs Construction loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average construction $173,876 $250,327 $103,962 52.29% $105,837 38.99% $114,156 13.37% $56,431 loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale 20.93% 15.92% 7.54% The construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, included no loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment, and $92 million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were considered TDRs at December 31, 2010. The outstanding commitments for these construction loan TDRs at December 31, 2010 were none for the BPPR reportable segment and $3 million for the BPNA reportable segment. There were no construction loan TDRs in non-performing status for the BPPR reportable segment and $92 million in the BPNA reportable segment at December 31, 2010. These construction loan TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment resulting in no specific reserves for the BPPR reportable segment and BPNA reportable segments at December 31, 2010. The impaired portions of collateral dependent construction loan TDRs were charged-off during the fourth quarter of 2010. the allowance for In the current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become the most important factor in determining the amount of loss incurred and the loan losses. The appropriate level of likelihood of to the entire recorded investment for a real estate loan is remote. However, in some cases during recent quarters declining real estate values have resulted in the determination that the estimated value of the collateral was insufficient to cover all of the recorded investment in the loans. losses that are equal Mortgage loans Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $31 million from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010, as a result of an increase of $206 million in the BPPR reportable 79 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT segment, partially offset by a reduction of $174 million in the BPNA reportable segment. During the fourth quarter of 2010, approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S. non- conventional residential mortgage loans were reclassified as loans held-for-sale at the BPNA reportable segment, most of which were delinquent mortgage loans, mortgages in non- performing restructurings. The mortgage business has continued to be negatively impacted by the recessionary economic conditions in Puerto Rico as evidenced by the increased levels of non-performing mortgage loans, and higher delinquency rates. However, the underwriting criteria and high reinstatement experience associated with the mortgage loans in Puerto Rico have helped to maintain losses at manageable levels. trouble debt status, or For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 2.08%, down by 67 basis points when compared to the same figure in 2009. The decrease in the mortgage loan net charge-off ratio was mainly due to lower losses in the U.S. mainland non-conventional mortgage business. For the year ended December 31, 2008 the Corporation’s mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio amounted to 1.17%. At the BPPR reportable segment, the mortgage loan net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $21.7 million, an increase of $11.0 million, when compared to The BPPR reportable same period in 2009. The mortgage loan net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $2.9 million. The increase in mortgage loan net charge-offs was prompted by the current weak economic conditions. The economy on the Island remained sluggish during 2010, and the Puerto Rico housing market has experienced a substantial slowdown in sales activity, as reflected in the low absorption rates of projects financed in the construction loan portfolio of the Puerto Rico segment. segment’s mortgage loans held-in-portfolio totaled $3.6 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $3.1 billion at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment totaled $42 million or 1.15% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at December 31, 2010 compared to $25 million or 0.79%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPR’s reportable segment amounted to $171 million, of which $105 million were in non-performing status. Although the criteria for specific impairment excludes large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically requires its application to modifications considered TDRs. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $5 million at December 31, 2010. The table that follows provides information on mortgage non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR reportable segment. (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 For the years ended BPPR Reportable Segment: Non-performing mortgage loans Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP, both excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale Mortgage loan net charge-offs Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans $517,443 $311,918 $201,506 14.19% $21,712 9.95% $10,686 7.25% $2,898 0.10% HIP, excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale 0.68% 0.38% The BPNA reportable segment mortgage loan portfolio totaled $875 million at December 31, 2010, compared with $1.5 billion at December 31, 2009. As compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, performance in terms of losses. this portfolio has reflected better The following table presents the credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segment’s mortgage loan portfolio. (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 For the years ended BPNA Reportable Segment: Non-performing mortgage loans Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale Mortgage loan net charge-offs Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans $23,587 $197,748 $136,193 2.70% $73,067 13.49% $109,920 8.08% $50,121 HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale 5.36% 6.93% 2.92% 80 BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio outstanding at December 31, 2010 amounted to approximately $513 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $22 million, which represents 4.29% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $1.1 billion with a related allowance for loan losses of $118 million or 11.16%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA. On December 31, 2010, BPNA reclassified approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S. non-conventional residential mortgage loans as loans held-for-sale. The net charge-offs for BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio amounted to approximately $65.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This resulted in a net charge-offs to average non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio ratio of 6.74% for the year ended 2010. These figures were approximately $97.1 million or 8.50% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The BPNA non-conventional mortgage business reflected an improved performance given more stable real estate market conditions. Consumer loans Non-performing consumer loans decreased from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of a decrease of $4.4 million in the BPNA reportable segment, partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in the BPPR reportable segment. The decrease in the BPNA reportable segment was primarily associated with home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages, which are categorized by the Corporation as experienced loans. These portfolios have improvements in delinquency levels, specifically as compared to 2009 levels. consumer Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans held-in-portfolio decreased mostly due to lower delinquencies in certain portfolios in the U.S. mainland and in Puerto Rico. The decrease in the ratio of consumer loans net charge-offs to average consumer loans held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was mainly attributed to personal loans and credit cards. The table that follows provides information on consumer non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR reportable segment. For the years ended (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 BPPR Reportable Segment: Non-performing consumer loans Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP, both excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale Consumer loan net charge-offs Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans $37,236 $36,695 $27,928 1.29% $131,783 1.19% $168,525 0.82% $146,841 HIP, excluding covered loans and loans held-for-sale 4.44% 5.21% 4.21% The following table presents the credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segment’s consumer loan portfolio. (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 BPNA Reportable Segment: Non-performing consumer loans Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale Consumer loan net charge-offs Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans $23,066 $27,490 $40,335 2.85% $82,380 2.83% $147,606 3.23% $91,582 HIP, excluding loans held-for-sale 9.30% 13.31% 6.89% For the years ended for loans the BPNA reportable As previously explained, the decrease in non-performing consumer segment was attributed in part to home equity lines of credit and closed- end second mortgages. As compared to 2009, these loan portfolios showed signs of improved performance due to significant charge-offs recorded in previous quarters improving the quality of the remaining portfolio, combined with aggressive collection efforts and loan modification programs. Combined net charge-offs for E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit and closed- end second mortgages amounted to approximately $58.3 million or 11.96% of those particular average loan portfolios for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $106.7 million or 16.99%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate market values at the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in 81 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2010 totaled $437 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $41 million, representing 9.29% of that particular portfolio. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed- end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2009 totaled $539 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $95 million, representing 17.59% of that particular portfolio. Other real estate Other real estate represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure. for resale of Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC increased by $36 million from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010, and included commercial and residential properties. With the slowdown in the real estate market caused primarily by persistent weak economic conditions in certain geographical areas, there has been a softening effect on the market repossessed real estate properties. Defaulted loans have increased, and these loans move through the foreclosure process to the other real estate classification. The combination of increased flow of defaulted loans from the loan portfolio to other real estate owned and the slowing of the liquidation market has resulted in an increase in the number of other real estate units on hand. The increase was partially offset by write-downs recorded in the fair value of the properties based on re-appraisals. Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC amounted to $58 million at December 31, 2010 and is disclosed in a separate line item in the statement of condition in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation acquired that portfolio of other real estate properties, which were recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the April 30, 2010 transaction date. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more Accruing loans past due 90 days or more disclosed in Table N consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage- backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from in some instances, have partial the sellers / servicers, and, guarantees under recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions, which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non- performing mortgage loans. Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for loan losses, which represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The the Corporation’s management evaluates allowance for In this economic evaluation, management conditions and the resulting impact on Popular Inc.’s loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical results of regulatory periodic requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other factors. loan losses on a quarterly basis. considers loss experience, loans, individual the adequacy of reviews of current credit The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected. The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10- 35. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for a description of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology. As indicated previously in this MD&A, the covered loans were recognized at fair value at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, losses and which included the impact of expected credit therefore, no allowance for credit losses was recorded at such date. To the extent credit deterioration occurs after the date of acquisition, the Corporation would record an allowance for loan losses. Also, the Corporation would record an increase in the the expected FDIC loss reimbursement sharing loss agreements. Management determined that there was no need to record an allowance for loan losses on the covered loans at December 31, 2010. share indemnification asset from the FDIC under for the 82 The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) at December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance. (Dollars in thousands) Specific ALLL Impaired loans [1] Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1] General ALLL Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1] General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1] Total ALLL Total loans held-in-portfolio [1] ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1] [1] Excludes covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. (Dollars in thousands) Specific ALLL Impaired loans Specific ALLL to impaired loans December 31, 2010 Commercial Construction Lease Financing Mortgage Consumer Total $8,550 445,968 $216 231,322 1.92% 0.09% – – – $5,004 121,209 4.13% – – – $13,770 798,499 1.72% $453,841 10,947,517 $47,508 269,529 $13,153 602,993 $65,864 4,403,513 $199,089 3,705,984 $779,455 19,929,536 4.15% 17.63% 2.18% 1.50% 5.37% 3.91% $462,391 11,393,485 $47,724 500,851 $13,153 602,993 $70,868 4,524,722 $199,089 3,705,984 $793,225 20,728,035 4.06% 9.53% 2.18% 1.57% 5.37% 3.83% December 31, 2009 Commercial Construction Lease Financing Mortgage Consumer Total $108,769 645,513 $162,907 841,361 16.85% 19.36% – – – $52,211 186,747 27.96% – – – $323,887 1,673,621 19.35% General ALLL Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans $328,940 12,018,546 $178,412 883,012 $18,558 675,629 $102,400 4,416,498 $309,007 4,045,807 $937,317 22,039,492 2.74% 20.20% 2.75% 2.32% 7.64% 4.25% Total ALLL Total loans held-in-portfolio ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio $437,709 12,664,059 $341,319 1,724,373 $18,558 675,629 $154,611 4,603,245 $309,007 4,045,807 $1,261,204 23,713,113 3.46% 19.79% 2.75% 3.36% 7.64% 5.32% Table P details the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan categories. The breakdown is made for analytical purposes, and it is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future loan losses may occur. Table P Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses As of December 31, 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Allowance for Loan Losses Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans* Allowance for Loan Losses Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans* Allowance for Loan Losses Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans* Allowance for Loan Losses Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans* Allowance for Loan Losses Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans* $462.4 55.0% $ 437.7 53.4% $294.6 53.0% $139.0 48.8% $171.3 40.9% 47.7 13.1 70.9 199.1 2.4 2.9 21.8 17.9 341.3 18.6 154.6 309.0 7.3 2.8 19.4 17.1 170.3 22.0 106.3 289.6 8.6 2.9 17.4 18.1 83.7 25.6 70.0 230.5 6.9 3.9 21.7 18.7 32.7 24.8 92.2 201.2 4.4 3.8 34.6 16.3 $793.2 100.0% $1,261.2 100.0% $882.8 100.0% $548.8 100.0% $522.2 100.0% (Dollars in millions) Commercial Construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Total * Note: For purposes of this table the term loans refers to loans held-in-portfolio (excludes loans held-for-sale). As compared to December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 decreased by approximately $468 million from 5.32% to 3.83% as a percentage of loans held-in-portfolio. This decrease considers reductions in the Corporation’s general and specific reserves of approximately $158 million and $310 million, respectively. As previously discussed, the reduction in the allowance for loan losses at the end of 2010 was primarily attributed to the previously mentioned credit actions that were taken during the fourth quarter of 2010. The allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2008 was 3.43%. On a combined basis, the decrease in the allowance for loan losses for the commercial and construction loan portfolios at December 31, 2010 was mainly related to the reclassifications to 83 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT loans held-for-sale in Puerto Rico, and charge-offs of previously reserved impaired portions in collateral dependent loans at both reportable segments. As compared to December 31, 2009, the decline in the allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans was triggered by the transfer to loans held-for-sale of all U.S. non- conventional mortgages in non-performing status, all troubled debt restructures, and all mortgage loan modifications in process related to this portfolio. The Corporation retained non- conventional mortgage loans that were current and not more than 90 days past due. The reduction in the allowance for loan losses for the consumer loan portfolio continues to be driven by more stable performance trends in certain portfolios combined with portfolio reductions both in the Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland operations. impairment The Corporation’s recorded investment in commercial, that were individually construction and mortgage loans evaluated for allowances declined from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 due to the charge-offs and loan reclassifications to loans held-for-sale during the fourth quarter. Since the loans held for sale are recorded at lower of cost or fair value, they did not require a specific allowance at December 31, 2010. and their specific The following table presents the Corporation’s recorded investment in commercial, construction and mortgage loans that were considered impaired and the related valuation allowance at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008. (In millions) Impaired loans: Valuation allowance No valuation allowance required Total impaired loans 2010 2009 2008 Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance $154.3 $13.8 $1,263.3 $323.9 $664.9 $194.7 644.2 – 410.3 – 232.7 – $798.5 $13.8 $1,673.6 $323.9 $897.6 $194.7 With respect to the $644 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for which no allowance for loan losses was required at December 31, 2010, management followed the guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. The $644 million impaired commercial and construction loans with no valuation allowance were collateral dependent loans in which management performed a detailed analysis based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell and determined that the collateral was deemed adequate to cover any losses at December 31, 2010. Average impaired loans during the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion, the year ended respectively. Average impaired loans December 31, 2008 amounted to approximately $0.6 billion. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired loans of $21.8 million and $16.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, interest income recognized on impaired loans amounted to $8.8 million. for The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Table - Activity in Specific ALLL (In thousands) Commercial Loans Construction Loans Mortgage Loans Total Specific allowance for loan losses at January 1, 2010 Provision for impaired loans Write-downs Less: Net charge-offs Specific allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 $108,769 194,338 34,979 259,578 $8,550 $162,907 264,305 35,135 391,861 $216 $52,211 146,707 106,376 87,538 $5,004 $323,887 605,350 176,490 738,977 $13,770 Table - Activity in Specific ALLL (In thousands) Commercial Loans Construction Loans Mortgage Loans Total Specific allowance for loan losses at January 1, 2009 Provision for impaired loans Less: Net charge-offs Specific allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009 $61,261 156,981 109,473 $108,769 $119,566 345,002 301,661 $162,907 $13,895 64,055 25,739 $52,211 $194,722 566,038 436,873 $323,887 84 loans evaluated amounted For the year ended December 31, 2010, total charge-offs for individually to impaired approximately $739.0 million, of which $446.8 million pertained to the BPPR reportable segment and $292.1 million to the BPNA reportable segment. Most of these charge-offs were related to the commercial and construction portfolios. As compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, the increase in charge-offs for construction loans considered impaired was mainly associated to particular borrowers in the BPPR reportable segment. As explained before, the impaired portions of collateral dependent loans were charged-off during the fourth quarter of 2010. These charge-offs represented $152.9 million and $56.5 million for BPPR and BPNA reportable segments, respectively. The specific reserves for these borrowers were established in prior quarters. real estate particularly The extended recession in the Puerto Rican economy continues to have a negative impact on the Corporation’s credit metrics, assets. Notwithstanding, the necessary actions have been taken to materially reduce the exposure to high-risk loan portfolios both in Puerto Rico and in the U.S. mainland operations. In the U.S., overall, the year 2010 signaled the reversal of the severe deterioration in credit quality that started in 2006. The U.S. operations have followed the general credit trends on the mainland demonstrating improvement. related the for overseeing implementation of Enterprise Risk and Operational Risk Management The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible the Enterprise risk Management (ERM) framework, developing and overseeing the implementation of risk programs and reporting that facilitate a broad integrated view of risk. The division also leads the ongoing development of a strong risk and management committees that support effective risk governance. For new products and initiatives, the ERM and the Compliance Divisions have put in place processes to ensure that an appropriate standard readiness assessment is performed before launching a new product or initiative. framework, policies and the culture Operational risk can manifest itself in various ways, including errors, fraud, business interruptions, inappropriate behavior of employees, and failure to perform in a timely manner, among others. These events can potentially result in financial losses and other damages to the Corporation, including reputational harm. The successful management of operational risk is particularly to a diversified financial services company like important Popular because of the nature, volume and complexity of its various businesses. lines from the business To monitor and control operational risk and mitigate related losses, the Corporation maintains a system of comprehensive policies and controls. The Corporation’s Operational Risk Committee (“ORCO”), which is composed of senior level representatives and corporate functions, provides executive oversight to facilitate consistency of effective policies, best practices, controls and monitoring tools for managing and assessing all types of operational risks across and Operational Risk the Corporation. The Financial the Corporation’s Risk Management Division, within Management Group, serves as ORCO’s operating arm and is responsible for establishing baseline processes to measure, monitor, limit and manage operational risk. In addition, the Auditing Division provides oversight about policy compliance and ensures adequate attention is paid to correct the identified issues. risk that appropriate Operational risks fall into two major categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. The primary responsibility for the day-to-day management of business specific risks relies on business unit managers. Accordingly, business unit managers are responsible for ensuring containment measures, including corporate-wide or business segment specific policies and procedures, controls and monitoring tools, are in place to minimize risk occurrence and loss exposures. Examples of these include personnel management practices, data reconciliation processes, transaction processing monitoring and analysis and interruptions. To manage contingency plans such as Legal, corporate-wide Information Security, Business Continuity, Finance and Compliance, assist the business units in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the individual businesses. specialized groups systems risks, for Operational risk management plays a different role in each the Financial and specific risks, category. For business Operational Risk Management Division works with the segments to ensure consistency in policies, processes, and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as and business information legal compliance, consolidated are corporate view is developed and communicated to the business level. Procedures exist that are designed to ensure continuity, assessed and a security, risks the 85 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT and systems, to manage operational that policies relating to conduct, ethics, and business practices are followed. We continually monitor the system of internal corporate-wide controls, processing data risk at processes and procedures appropriate, cost-effective levels. An additional level of review is applied to current and potential regulation and its impact on business processes, to ensure that appropriate controls are put in place to address regulation requirements. Today’s threats to customer information and information systems are complex, more wide spread, continually emerging, and increasing at a rapid pace. Popular continues to invest in better tools and processes in all key security areas, and monitors these threats with increased rigor and focus. and includes financial Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“ASU 2009-16”) ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the concept of a qualifying special- purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets, changes the requirements for additional derecognizing assets, disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or third-party beneficial the meaning of the term participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating as defined in ASC paragraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance was adopted and has been applied as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that began on January 1, 2010, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and will be applied for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The recognition and measurement provisions have been applied to transfers that have occurred on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date, existing qualifying special-purpose entities have been evaluated for consolidation in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation evaluated transfers of financial assets executed during the year ended December 31, 2010 pursuant to the new accounting guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage interests, and the addition of interests securitizations (Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s accounting for such transactions or results of operations or financial condition for such period. is accounted for as a sale. Control A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial assets in which the financial asset, or a pool of Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control over the transferred assets and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1) the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the assets; and (3) the transferor no longer maintains effective control over the assets. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset that meets the requirements for sale accounting; or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured borrowing. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) - Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2009-17”) and FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (“ASU 2010-10”) ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and changes how a reporting entity determines is insufficiently capitalized or is not when an entity that controlled through voting (or should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a) a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which entity has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s similar rights) the entity that most significantly impact economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the activities of the It also requires ongoing entity’s economic performance. is the assessments of whether a variable interest holder primary beneficiary of a VIE. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affected all entities that were within the scope of the original guidance, as well as qualifying special- purpose entities (“QSPEs”) that were previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on VIEs did not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption. The principal VIEs evaluated by the Corporation during the year ended December 31, 2010 included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which management has concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management believes that the Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU 2009-17 for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral allows asset that have no obligation to fund potentially managers significant losses of an investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the “Investment Company Guide”). The FASB also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure requirements in ASU 2009-17. 86 Upon adoption of the new guidance, the Corporation has not been required to consolidate any previously unconsolidated VIEs for which it has a variable interest at December 31, 2010. Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for required disclosures guaranteed mortgage securitizations in which the Corporation holds a variable interest. associated with the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (“ASU 2010-11”) ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. The type of credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may have needed to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The amendments in ASU 2010-11 were effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance has not had a significant effect, if any, on its the Corporation has not held any embedded credit derivatives since the effective date of this Update. consolidated financial statements since FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (“ASU 2010-18”) The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under ASC Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Debt ASC Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 were effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim Receivables — Troubled Subtopic 310-40, 87 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments were required to be applied prospectively. Upon initial adoption of the guidance in ASU 2010-18, an entity could have made a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30. This election could have been applied on a pool-by-pool basis and did not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions loans with credit deterioration. Early application was of permitted and the Corporation elected to early adopt the provisions of this statement, effective with the closing of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010. As a result, the accounting for modified loans follows the guidelines of ASU 2010-18; however, the adoption of these provisions did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s result of operations or financial position at December 31, 2010. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts The amendments in this ASU, issued in December 2010, modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Corporation does not anticipate that this guidance will have an effect on its consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations The FASB issued ASU 2010-29 in December 2010. The amendments in this ASU affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should the combined entity as disclose revenue and earnings of though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The business amendments combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance impacts disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. prospectively effective are for Glossary of Selected Financial Terms Accretion of Discount - Accounting process for adjusting the book value of a bond recorded at a discount to the par value at maturity. Allowance for Loan Losses - The reserve established to cover credit losses inherent in loans held-in-portfolio. Asset Securitization - The process of converting receivables and other assets that are not readily marketable into securities that can be placed and traded in capital markets. Basis Point - Equals to one-hundredth of one percent. Used to express changes or differences in interest yields and rates. Book Value Per Common Share - Total common shareholders’ equity divided by the total number of common shares outstanding. Brokered Certificate of Deposit - Deposit purchased from a broker acting as an agent for depositors. The broker, often a securities broker-dealer, pools CDs from many small investors and markets them to financial institutions and negotiates a higher rate for CDs placed with the purchaser. Cash Flow Hedge - A derivative designated as hedging the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction. Common Shares Outstanding - Total number of shares of common stock issued less common shares held in treasury. Core Deposits - A deposit category that includes all non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit with denominations under $100,000. These deposits are considered a stable source of funds. Derivative - A contractual agreement between two parties to exchange cash or other assets in response to changes in an external factor, such as an interest rate or a foreign exchange rate. Dividend Payout Ratio - Dividends paid on common shares divided by net income applicable to shares of common stock. Duration - Expected life of a financial instrument taking into account its coupon yield / cost, interest payments, maturity and call features. Duration attempts to measure actual maturity, as opposed to final maturity. Duration measures the time required to recover a dollar of price in present value terms (including principal and interest), whereas average life computes the average time needed to collect one dollar of principal. Earning Assets - Assets that earn interest, such as loans, investment securities, money market investments and trading account securities. Fair Value Hedge - A derivative designated as hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or a firm commitment. Gap - The difference that exists at a specific period of time between the maturities or repricing terms of interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities. Goodwill - The excess of the purchase price of net assets over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. 88 - / Liabilities Interest Rate Caps / Floors - An interest rate cap is a contractual agreement between two counterparties in which the buyer, in return for paying a fee, will receive cash payments from the seller at specified dates if rates go above a specified interest rate level known as the strike rate (cap). An interest rate floor is a contractual agreement between two counterparties in which the buyer, in return for paying a fee, will receive cash payments from the seller at specified dates if interest rates go below the strike rate. Interest Rate Swap - Financial transactions in which two counterparties agree to exchange streams of payments over time according to a pre-determined formula. Swaps are normally used to transform the market exposure associated with a loan or bond borrowing from one interest rate base (fixed-term or floating rate). Interest-Sensitive Assets Interest-earning assets / liabilities for which interest rates are adjustable within a specified time period due to maturity or contractual arrangements. Internal Capital Generation Rate - Rate at which a bank generates equity capital, computed by dividing net income (loss) less dividends by the average balance of stockholders’ equity for a given accounting period. Letter of Credit - A document issued by the Corporation on behalf of a customer to a third party promising to pay that third party upon presentation of specified documents. A letter of credit effectively substitutes the Corporation’s credit for that of the Corporation’s customer. Loan-to-value (LTV) - A commonly used credit quality metric that is reported in terms of ending and average loan-to-value. Ending LTV is calculated by taking the outstanding loan balance at the end of the period divided by the appraised value of the property securing the loan. A loan to value of 100 percent reflects a loan that is currently secured by a property valued at an amount that is exactly equal to the loan amount. Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR) - The right to service a mortgage loan when the underlying loan is sold or securitized. Servicing includes collections of principal, interest and escrow payments from borrowers and accounting for and remitting principal and interest payments to investors. Net Charge-Offs - The amount of loans written-off as uncollectible, net of the recovery of loans previously written-off. Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock - Net income (loss) adjusted for preferred stock dividends, including undeclared or unpaid dividends if cumulative, and charges or credits related to the extinguishment of preferred stock or induced conversions of preferred stock. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share - Basic - Net income (loss) applicable to common stock divided by the number of weighted-average common shares outstanding. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share - Diluted - Net income (loss) applicable to common stock divided by the sum of weighted-average common shares outstanding plus the effect Capital Purchase Program, qualifying trust preferred securities and minority interest in the qualifying equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and other disallowed intangible assets, disallowed portion of deferred tax assets and the deduction for nonfinancial equity investments. To be announced (TBA) - A term used to describe a forward mortgage-backed securities trade. The term TBA is derived from the fact that the actual mortgage-backed security that will be delivered to fulfill a TBA trade is not designated at the time the trade is made. Total Risk-Adjusted Assets - The sum of assets and credit equivalent off-balance sheet amounts that have been adjusted according to assigned regulatory risk weights, excluding the non- qualifying portion of allowance for loan and lease losses, goodwill and other intangible assets. Total Risk-Based Capital - Consists generally of Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for loan losses, qualifying subordinated debt and the allowed portion of the net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities. Treasury Stock - Common stock repurchased and held by the issuing corporation for possible future issuance. 89 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT or over exchanges of common stock equivalents that have the potential to be converted into common shares. Net Interest Income - The difference between the revenue generated on earning assets, less the interest cost of funding those assets. Net Interest Margin - Net interest income divided by total average interest-earning assets. Net Interest Spread - Difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities, and the contribution of non-interest bearing funds supporting earning assets (primarily demand deposits and stockholders’ equity). Non-Performing Assets - Includes loans on which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to default on interest and / or principal payments or other factors indicative of doubtful collection, loans for which the interest rates or terms of repayment have been renegotiated, and real estate which has been acquired through foreclosure. Option Contract - Conveys a right, but not an obligation, to buy or sell a specified number of units of a financial instrument at a specific price per unit within a specified time period. The instrument underlying the option may be a security, a futures contract (for example, an interest rate option), a commodity, a currency, or a cash instrument. Options may be bought or sold on a organized principal-to-principal basis or may be individually negotiated. A call option gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy the underlying instrument. A put option gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying instrument. Provision For Loan Losses - The periodic expense needed to maintain the level of the allowance for loan losses at a level consistent with management’s assessment of the loan portfolio in light of current economic conditions and market trends, and taking into account loan impairment and net charge-offs. Return on Assets - Net income as a percentage of average total assets. Return on Equity - Net income applicable to common stock as a percentage of average common stockholders’ equity. Servicing Right - A contractual agreement to provide certain billing, bookkeeping and collection services with respect to a pool of loans. Tangible Equity - Consists of stockholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets. Tier 1 Common Equity - Tier 1 capital, less non-common elements. Tier 1 Leverage Ratio - Tier 1 capital divided by average adjusted quarterly total assets. Average adjusted quarterly assets are adjusted to exclude non-qualifying intangible assets and disallowed deferred tax assets. Tier 1 Capital - Consists generally of common stockholders’ equity (including the related surplus, retained earnings and capital reserves), qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, senior perpetual preferred stock issued under the TARP counter the on 90 Statistical Summary 2006–2010 Statements of Condition (In thousands) Assets Cash and due from banks Money market investments: Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell Time deposits with other banks Total money market investments Trading securities, at fair value Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value Loans held-in-portfolio: Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Less - Unearned income Allowance for loan losses Total loans held-in-portfolio FDIC loss share indemnification asset Premises and equipment, net Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Accrued income receivable Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value Other assets Goodwill Other intangible assets Assets from discontinued operations Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Liabilities: Deposits: Non-interest bearing Interest bearing Total deposits Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Other liabilities Liabilities from discontinued operations Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity Preferred stock Common stock Surplus (Accumulated deficit) retained earnings Treasury stock - at cost Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 2010 2009 At December 31, 2008 2007 2006 $452,373 181,961 797,334 979,295 546,713 5,236,852 122,354 163,513 893,938 20,834,276 4,836,882 106,241 793,225 24,771,692 2,311,997 545,453 161,496 57,565 150,658 166,907 1,456,073 647,387 58,696 – $38,722,962 $4,939,321 21,822,879 26,762,200 2,412,550 364,222 4,170,183 1,213,276 – 34,922,431 50,160 10,229 4,094,005 (347,328) (574) (5,961) 3,800,531 $38,722,962 $677,330 $784,987 $818,825 $950,158 452,932 549,865 1,002,797 462,436 6,694,714 212,962 164,149 90,796 519,218 275,436 794,654 645,903 7,924,487 294,747 217,667 536,058 883,686 123,026 1,006,712 767,955 8,515,135 484,466 216,584 1,889,546 286,531 15,177 301,708 382,325 9,850,862 91,340 297,394 719,922 23,827,263 25,857,237 28,203,566 32,325,364 – 114,150 1,261,204 22,451,909 – 584,853 – 124,364 882,807 24,850,066 – 620,807 – 182,110 548,832 27,472,624 – 588,163 – 308,347 522,232 31,494,785 – 595,140 125,483 89,721 81,410 84,816 – 126,080 169,747 1,324,917 604,349 43,803 – $34,736,325 – 156,227 176,034 1,119,869 605,792 53,163 12,587 $38,882,769 – 216,114 191,624 1,462,015 630,761 69,503 – $44,411,437 – 248,240 160,139 1,451,751 667,853 107,554 – $47,403,987 $4,495,301 21,429,593 25,924,894 2,632,790 7,326 2,648,632 983,866 – 32,197,508 $4,293,553 23,256,652 27,550,205 3,551,608 4,934 3,386,763 1,096,338 24,557 35,614,405 $4,510,789 23,823,689 28,334,478 5,437,265 1,501,979 4,621,352 934,481 – 40,829,555 $4,222,133 20,216,198 24,438,331 5,762,445 4,034,125 8,737,246 811,534 – 43,783,681 50,160 6,395 2,804,238 (292,752) (15) (29,209) 2,538,817 $34,736,325 1,483,525 1,773,792 621,879 (374,488) (207,515) (28,829) 3,268,364 $38,882,769 186,875 1,761,908 568,184 1,319,467 (207,740) (46,812) 3,581,882 $44,411,437 186,875 1,753,146 526,856 1,594,144 (206,987) (233,728) 3,620,306 $47,403,987 91 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Statistical Summary 2006–2010 Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per common share information) Interest Income: Loans Money market investments Investment securities Trading securities Total interest income Less - Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities Trading account profit Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustment on loans held-for-sale FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business All other operating income Total non-interest income Operating Expenses: Personnel costs All other operating expenses Total operating expenses Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax Income tax expense (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Net Income (loss) 2010 $1,676,734 5,384 238,210 27,918 1,948,246 653,381 1,294,865 1,011,880 282,985 3,992 16,404 (56,139) (25,751) 42,555 640,802 666,330 1,288,193 514,198 811,349 1,325,547 245,631 108,230 137,401 – $137,401 For the years Ended December 31, 2009 2008 2007 2006 $1,519,249 8,570 291,988 35,190 1,854,997 753,744 1,101,253 1,405,807 $1,868,462 17,982 343,568 44,111 2,274,123 994,919 1,279,204 991,384 $2,046,437 25,190 441,608 39,000 2,552,235 1,246,577 1,305,658 341,219 $1,888,320 29,626 508,579 28,714 2,455,239 1,200,508 1,254,731 187,556 (304,554) 287,820 964,439 1,067,175 219,546 39,740 69,716 43,645 100,869 37,197 22,120 36,258 (35,060) – – – 672,275 896,501 533,263 620,933 1,154,196 (562,249) (8,302) 6,018 – – – 710,595 829,974 608,465 728,263 1,336,728 (218,934) 461,534 60,046 – – – 675,583 873,695 620,760 924,702 1,545,462 292,672 90,164 76,337 – – – 635,794 770,509 591,975 686,256 1,278,231 559,453 139,694 (553,947) (680,468) 202,508 419,759 (19,972) ($573,919) (563,435) ($1,243,903) (267,001) ($64,493) (62,083) $357,676 Net (Loss) Income Applicable to Common Stock ($54,576) $97,377 ($1,279,200) ($76,406) $345,763 Statistical Summary 2006–2010 Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income On a Taxable Equivalent Basis* 92 (Dollars in thousands) Assets Interest earning assets: Money market investments U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. Government entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateral mortgage obligations and mortgage- backed securities Other Total investment securities Trading account securities Non-covered loans Covered loans Total loans (net of unearned income) Total interest earning assets / Interest income Total non-interest earning assets Total assets from continuing operations Total assets from discontinued operations Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Interest bearing liabilities: Savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand accounts Time deposits Short-term borrowings Notes payable Note issued to the FDIC Total interest bearing liabilities / Interest expense Total non-interest bearing liabilities Total liabilities from continuing operations Total liabilities from discontinued operations Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis Cost of funding earning assets Net interest margin Effect of the taxable equivalent adjustment Net interest income per books 4,340,545 176,766 6,299,569 493,628 22,456,846 3,364,932 25,821,778 34,154,021 4,164,875 38,318,896 $38,318,896 $10,951,331 10,967,033 2,400,653 2,293,878 2,753,490 29,366,385 5,693,344 35,059,729 35,059,729 3,259,167 $38,318,896 Average Balance 2010 Interest Average Rate Average Balance 2009 Interest Average Rate $1,539,046 80,740 1,473,227 $5,384 1,527 54,748 0.35% 1.89 3.72 $1,183,209 70,308 1,977,460 $8,573 3,452 103,303 0.72% 4.91 5.22 228,291 11,171 4.89 3.70 5.98 3.79 6.55 6.14 9.01 6.51 342,479 22,048 4,757,407 301,649 7,449,303 614,827 200,616 15,046 344,465 40,771 6.44 4.22 4.99 4.62 6.63 24,836,067 1,540,918 6.20 160,632 10,576 238,654 32,333 1,377,871 303,096 1,680,967 $1,934,727 5.68% $1,957,338 5.73% 34,083,406 2,478,103 36,561,509 7,861 $36,569,370 93,796 257,085 60,278 183,701 58,521 0.86% $10,342,100 12,192,824 2.34 2,887,727 2.51 8.01 2,945,169 2.13 $107,355 393,906 69,357 183,126 1.04% 3.23 2.40 6.22 753,744 2.66 653,381 2.22 28,367,820 5,338,848 33,706,668 10,637 33,717,305 2,852,065 $36,569,370 $1,303,957 $1,180,983 1.91% 3.82% 2.21% 3.47% 9,092 $1,294,865 79,730 $1,101,253 * Shows the effect of the tax exempt status of some loans and investments on their yield, using the applicable statutory income tax rates. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code. This adjustment is shown in order to compare the yields of the tax exempt and taxable assets on a taxable basis. Note: Average loan balances include the average balance of non-accruing loans. No interest income is recognized for these loans in accordance with the Corporation’s policy. 93 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Average Balance 2008 Interest Average Rate Average Balance 2007 Interest Average Rate Average Balance 2006 Interest Average Rate $699,922 463,268 4,793,935 $18,790 21,934 243,709 2.68% 4.73 5.08 $513,704 498,232 6,294,489 $26,565 21,164 310,632 5.17% 4.25 4.93 $564,423 521,917 7,527,841 $31,382 22,930 368,738 5.56% 4.39 4.90 254,952 16,760 2,411,171 266,306 8,189,632 664,907 114,810 14,952 412,165 47,909 6.57 4.76 5.61 5.03 7.21 185,035 12,546 2,575,941 273,558 9,827,255 652,636 148,620 14,085 507,047 40,408 6.78 5.77 5.15 5.16 6.19 188,690 13,249 3,063,097 415,131 11,716,676 491,122 177,206 15,807 597,930 30,593 7.02 5.79 3.81 5.10 6.23 26,471,616 1,888,786 7.14 25,380,548 2,068,078 8.15 24,123,315 1,910,737 7.92 36,026,077 3,417,397 39,443,474 1,480,543 $40,924,017 $2,367,650 6.57% 36,374,143 3,054,948 39,429,091 7,675,844 $47,104,935 $2,642,098 7.26% 36,895,536 2,963,092 39,858,628 8,435,938 $48,294,566 $2,570,642 6.97% $10,548,563 12,795,436 5,115,166 2,263,272 $177,729 522,394 168,070 126,726 1.68% $10,126,956 11,398,715 4.08 8,315,502 3.29 1,041,410 5.60 $226,924 538,869 424,530 56,254 2.24% 4.73 5.11 5.40 $9,317,779 9,976,613 10,404,667 2,093,337 $157,431 422,663 508,174 112,240 1.69% 4.24 4.88 5.36 1,246,577 4.04 30,722,437 4,966,820 35,689,257 1,876,465 37,565,722 3,358,295 $40,924,017 994,919 3.24 30,882,583 4,825,029 35,707,612 7,535,897 43,243,509 3,861,426 $47,104,935 1,200,508 3.78 31,792,396 4,626,272 36,418,668 8,134,625 44,553,293 3,741,273 $48,294,566 $1,372,731 $1,395,521 $1,370,134 2.76% 3.81% 3.43% 3.83% 3.25% 3.72% 93,527 $1,279,204 89,863 $1,305,658 115,403 $1,254,731 94 Statistical Summary 2009–2010 Quarterly Financial Data (In thousands, except per common share information) Summary of Operations Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities Trading account profit (loss) (Loss) gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business Other non-interest income Operating expenses (Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax Income tax (benefit) expense (Loss) income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Net (loss) income Net (loss) income applicable to common stock Net (loss) income per common share - basic and diluted: (Loss) income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net (loss) income Selected Average Balances (In millions) Total assets Loans Interest earning assets Deposits Interest bearing liabilities Selected Ratios Return on assets Return on equity 2010 2009 Fourth Quarter Third Quarter [1] Second Quarter [1] First Quarter Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter $507,199 152,624 354,575 354,409 $521,435 164,657 356,778 215,013 $492,417 177,822 314,595 202,258 $427,195 158,278 268,917 240,200 $440,296 170,978 269,318 352,771 $454,463 178,074 276,389 331,063 $471,046 187,986 283,060 349,444 $489,192 216,706 272,486 372,529 (218) 8,303 3,732 5,860 397 2,464 81 (223) (1,246) 8,499 (9,059) 7,579 53,705 16,839 176,146 6,823 (33,033) (3,046) (1,573) (7,668) (9,311) (15,037) (12,222) – 7,520 10,641 24,394 – 934 – – (8,728) – (13,453) – (13,813) – – – – – 126,080 344,677 640,802 174,100 371,541 – 195,920 328,416 – 170,230 280,913 – 167,700 298,754 – 170,252 220,600 – 168,748 330,645 – 165,575 304,197 (238,905) (11,764) 596,118 102,032 (17,252) 27,237 (94,330) (9,275) (206,320) 6,907 (115,230) 6,331 (171,190) 5,393 (69,509) (26,933) (227,141) 494,086 (44,489) (85,055) (213,227) (121,561) (176,583) (42,576) – ($227,141) – $494,086 – ($44,489) – – ($85,055) ($213,227) (3,427) ($124,988) (6,599) ($183,182) (9,946) ($52,522) ($227,451) $494,086 ($236,156) ($85,055) ($213,227) ($595,614) ($207,810) ($77,200) ($0.22) – ($0.22) $0.48 – $0.48 ($0.28) ($0.13) ($0.33) $1.41 ($0.71) ($0.24) – ($0.28) – ($0.13) – ($0.33) (0.01) $1.40 (0.03) ($0.74) (0.03) ($0.27) $39,337 26,784 34,438 27,144 29,357 $40,185 27,041 35,240 27,111 30,932 $39,758 26,066 35,405 26,783 30,888 $33,916 23,345 31,489 25,541 26,237 $35,025 24,047 32,746 26,234 27,143 $35,813 24,453 33,457 26,681 27,734 $37,048 25,038 34,597 26,976 28,632 $38,437 25,830 35,572 27,436 30,001 (2.29%) (23.51) 4.88% 56.94 (0.45%) (6.17) (1.02%) (14.56) (2.42%) (34.12) (1.38%) (26.24) (1.98%) (53.48) (0.55%) (19.13) [1] As recasted. Refer to the Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction section of this MD&A for explanation on the recasting. Note: Because each reporting period stands on its own the sum of the net (loss) income per common share for the quarters is not equal to the net (loss) income per common share for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. This was principally influenced by the issuance of over 383 million and 357 million new shares of common stock as part of the depository shares issuance and exchange offers that occurred during May 2010 and August 2009, respectively. Both events impacted significantly the weighted average common shares considered in the computation. 95 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Management’s Report to Stockholders To Our Stockholders: Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The management of Popular, Inc. (the Corporation) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and includes controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The management of Popular, Inc. has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the criteria referred to above. The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, as stated in their report dated March 1, 2011 which appears herein. Richard L. Carrión Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Jorge A. Junquera Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 96 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Popular, Inc. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of condition and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report to Stockholders. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation changed the manner in which it accounts for the financial assets and liabilities at fair value in 2008. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management’s assessment and our audit of Popular, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting also included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 97 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP San Juan, Puerto Rico March 1, 2011 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (OF PUERTO RICO) License No. 216 Expires Dec. 1, 2013 Stamp 2493504 of the P.R. Society of Certified Public Accountants has been affixed to the file copy of this report. Consolidated Statements of Condition December 31, (In thousands, except share information) Assets Cash and due from banks Money market investments: Federal funds sold Securities purchased under agreements to resell Time deposits with other banks Total money market investments Trading account securities, at fair value: Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge Other trading securities Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge Other investment securities available-for-sale Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2010 - $120,873; 2009 - $213,146) Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value 2010 - $165,233; 2009 - $165,497) Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value Loans held-in-portfolio: Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Less - Unearned income Allowance for loan losses Total loans held-in-portfolio, net FDIC loss share indemnification asset Premises and equipment, net Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Accrued income receivable Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value Other assets Goodwill Other intangible assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Liabilities: Deposits: Non-interest bearing Interest bearing Total deposits Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Other liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies (See notes 30 and 34) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding in both periods presented (aggregate liquidation preference value of $50,160) Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,700,000,000 shares authorized (2009 - 700,000,000); 1,022,929,158 shares issued (2009 - 639,544,895) and 1,022,727,802 outstanding (2009 - 639,540,105) Surplus Accumulated deficit Treasury stock - at cost, 201,356 shares (2009 - 4,790) Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of ($55,616) (2009 - ($33,964)) Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2010 $452,373 16,110 165,851 797,334 979,295 492,183 54,530 2,031,123 3,205,729 122,354 163,513 893,938 20,834,276 4,836,882 106,241 793,225 24,771,692 2,311,997 545,453 161,496 57,565 150,658 166,907 1,456,073 647,387 58,696 $38,722,962 $4,939,321 21,822,879 26,762,200 2,412,550 364,222 4,170,183 1,213,276 34,922,431 50,160 10,229 4,094,005 (347,328) (574) (5,961) 3,800,531 $38,722,962 98 2009 $677,330 159,807 293,125 549,865 1,002,797 415,653 46,783 2,330,441 4,364,273 212,962 164,149 90,796 23,827,263 – 114,150 1,261,204 22,451,909 – 584,853 125,483 – 126,080 169,747 1,324,917 604,349 43,803 $34,736,325 $4,495,301 21,429,593 25,924,894 2,632,790 7,326 2,648,632 983,866 32,197,508 50,160 6,395 2,804,238 (292,752) (15) (29,209) 2,538,817 $34,736,325 99 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Consolidated Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per share information) Interest income: Loans Money market investments Investment securities Trading account securities Total interest income Interest expense: Deposits Short-term borrowings Long-term debt Total interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Service charges on deposit accounts Other service fees Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Trading account profit Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business Other operating income Total non-interest income Operating expenses: Personnel costs: Salaries Pension and other benefits Total personnel costs Net occupancy expenses Equipment expenses Other taxes Professional fees Communications Business promotion Printing and supplies Impairment losses on long-lived assets FDIC deposit insurance Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Total operating expenses Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax Income tax expense (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax Net Income (Loss) Net (Loss) Income Applicable to Common Stock Net (Loss) Income per Common Share - Basic Net (loss) income from continuing operations Net loss from discontinued operations Net (loss) income per common share - basic Net Income per Common Share - Diluted Net (loss) income from continuing operations Net loss from discontinued operations Net (loss) income per common share - diluted Dividends Declared per Common Share The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2010 $1,676,734 5,384 238,210 27,918 1,948,246 350,881 60,278 242,222 653,381 1,294,865 1,011,880 282,985 195,803 377,504 3,992 16,404 (56,139) (25,751) 42,555 640,802 93,023 1,288,193 412,057 102,141 514,198 116,203 85,851 50,608 166,105 38,905 46,671 9,302 – 67,644 38,787 182,100 – 9,173 1,325,547 245,631 108,230 137,401 – $137,401 ($54,576) ($0.06) – ($0.06) ($0.06) – ($0.06) – Year ended December 31, 2009 2008 $1,519,249 8,570 291,988 35,190 1,854,997 501,262 69,357 183,125 753,744 1,101,253 1,405,807 (304,554) 213,493 394,187 219,546 39,740 (35,060) – – – 64,595 896,501 410,616 122,647 533,263 111,035 101,530 52,605 111,287 46,264 38,872 11,093 1,545 76,796 (78,300) 138,724 – 9,482 1,154,196 (562,249) (8,302) (553,947) (19,972) ($573,919) $97,377 $0.29 (0.05) $0.24 $0.29 (0.05) $0.24 $0.02 $1,868,462 17,982 343,568 44,111 2,274,123 700,122 168,070 126,727 994,919 1,279,204 991,384 287,820 206,957 416,163 69,716 43,645 6,018 – – – 87,475 829,974 485,720 122,745 608,465 120,456 111,478 52,799 121,145 51,386 62,731 14,450 13,491 15,037 – 141,301 12,480 11,509 1,336,728 (218,934) 461,534 (680,468) (563,435) ($1,243,903) ($1,279,200) ($2.55) (2.00) ($4.55) ($2.55) (2.00) ($4.55) $0.48 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment Provision for loan losses Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Impairment losses on long-lived assets Amortization of intangibles Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums and deferred fees Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument FDIC loss share expense FDIC deposit insurance expense (Earnings) losses from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment Net loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale Cost (benefit) on early extinguishment of debt Gain on sale of processing and technology business, net of transaction costs Fair value adjustments of other assets held-for-sale Earnings from investments under the equity method Stock options expense Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale Net decrease in trading securities Net decrease in accrued income receivable Net (increase) decrease in other assets Net decrease in interest payable Deferred income taxes Net (decrease) increase in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in money market investments Purchases of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale Proceeds from sale of other investment securities Net repayments (disbursements) on loans Proceeds from sale of loans Acquisition of loan portfolios Cash received from acquisitions Net proceeds from sale of processing and technology business Mortgage servicing rights purchased Acquisition of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets Net cash provided by investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Net decrease in deposits Net decrease in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings Payments of notes payable Proceeds from issuance of notes payable Net proceeds from issuance of depositary shares Dividends paid Proceeds from issuance of common stock Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and associated warrants Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities Treasury stock acquired Net cash used in financing activities Net decrease in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of period Cash and due from banks at end of period 100 Year ended December 31, 2009 2008 $(573,919) ($1,243,903) 64,451 1,405,807 – 1,545 9,482 32,960 71,534 (219,546) – – 76,796 (1,674) (412) 40,268 (78,300) – – (17,695) 202 (1,129,554) (354,472) 79,264 1,542,470 30,601 (259,756) (47,695) (79,890) 19,599 16,837 1,202,822 628,903 (208,143) (4,193,290) (59,562) (38,913) 1,631,607 141,566 75,101 3,825,313 52,294 1,053,747 328,170 (72,675) – – (1,364) (69,640) 40,243 149,947 2,654,401 (1,625,598) (918,818) 2,392 (813,077) 60,675 – (71,438) – – (25,080) (17) (3,390,961) (107,657) 784,987 $677,330 73,088 1,010,375 12,480 17,445 11,509 52,174 72,379 (64,296) – – 15,037 198,880 (25,904) 83,056 – – 120,789 (8,916) 1,099 (2,302,189) (431,789) 1,492,870 1,754,100 59,459 71,036 (58,406) 379,726 1,002 (33,583) 2,501,421 1,257,518 212,058 (4,075,884) (5,086,169) (193,820) 2,491,732 5,277,873 192,588 2,445,510 49,489 (1,093,437) 2,426,491 (4,505) – – (42,331) (146,140) 60,058 166,683 2,680,196 (754,177) (1,885,656) (1,497,045) (2,016,414) 1,028,098 – (188,644) 17,712 1,324,935 – (361) (3,971,552) (33,838) 818,825 $784,987 2010 $137,401 58,861 1,011,880 – – 9,173 22,859 (254,879) (3,992) (42,555) 25,751 67,644 – (1,812) 56,139 1,171 (616,186) – (9,863) – (735,095) (307,629) 81,370 721,398 11,315 (3,559) (29,562) (12,127) (11,060) (13,484) 25,758 163,159 119,741 (764,042) (97,188) (64,591) 1,865,879 188,129 123,836 397,086 – 1,539,246 34,011 (256,406) 261,311 642,322 (1,041) (66,855) 14,460 141,236 4,077,134 (1,553,486) (220,240) 356,896 (4,260,578) 111,101 1,101,773 (310) 153 – – (559) (4,465,250) (224,957) 677,330 $452,373 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Note: The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 includes the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations. 101 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity Surplus $568,184 Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit) $1,319,467 (1,243,903) Accumulated other comprehensive loss ($46,812) (In thousands) Balance at December 31, 2007 Net loss Issuance of stocks Preferred stock discount Warrants issued in connection with TARP Issuance of common stock under Dividend Reinvestment Plan Accretion of discount Issuance costs Stock options expense on unexercised options, net of forfeitures Cumulative effect of accounting change Dividends declared: Common stock Preferred stock Common stock reissuance Common stock purchases Other comprehensive income, net of tax Transfer from accumulated deficit to surplus Common stock, including treasury stock Preferred stock $1,554,168 $186,875 1,335,000 [1] (38,833) [2] 11,884 483 [3] 586 (361) Balance at December 31, 2008 $1,566,277 $1,483,525 (901,165) (536,715) 4,515 [3] Net loss Exchange of preferred stock for trust preferred securities issued Issuance of common stock in exchange of preferred stock Issuance of common stock in connection with early extinguishment of debt Accretion of discount Issuance costs Stock options expense on unexercised options, net of forfeitures Change in par value Dividends declared: Common stock Preferred stock Common stock reissuance Common stock purchases Treasury stock retired Other comprehensive loss, net of tax Transfer from accumulated deficit to surplus 1,717 1,858 (1,689,389)[7] 378 (17) 125,556 38,833 [2] 5,828 (10,065)[4] 1,099 18,000 $621,879 291,974 315,794 556 [6] 202 1,689,389 [7] (125,556) 10,000 Balance at December 31, 2009 $6,380 $50,160 $2,804,238 Net income Issuance of stocks Issuance of common stock upon conversion of preferred stock Issuance costs Tax effect from shared-based compensation Dividends declared: Preferred stock Deemed dividend on preferred stock Common stock purchases Other comprehensive income, net of tax Balance at December 31, 2010 1 1,150,000 [8] 152 3,833 [8] (1,150,000) [8] 1,337,834 [8] (48,227)[9] 8 (559) (483)[3] (261,831) (134,924) (34,814) (18,000) ($374,488) (573,919) 485,280 [5] 230,388 [5] (4,515)[3] (5,641) (39,857) (10,000) ($292,752) 137,401 (310) (191,667) Total $3,581,882 (1,243,903) 1,335,000 (38,833) 38,833 17,712 (10,065) 1,099 (261,831) (134,924) (34,814) 586 (361) 17,983 17,983 ($28,829) $3,268,364 (573,919) (415,885) (12,636) 317,652 556 202 (5,641) (39,857) 378 (17) (380) (380) ($29,209) 23,248 $2,538,817 137,401 1,150,153 191,667 (48,227) 8 (310) (191,667) (559) 23,248 $9,655 $50,160 $4,094,005 ($347,328) ($5,961) $3,800,531 [1] Issuance of Preferred Stock-2008 Series B ($400,000) and issuance of Preferred Stock-2008 Series C ($935,000). [2] Value allocated to the TARP related warrants as part of the issuance of the 2008 Series C Preferred Stock. [3] Accretion of preferred stock discount - 2008 Series C Preferred Stock. [4] Issuance costs of 2008 Series B Preferred Stock. [5] Excess of carrying amount of preferred stock exchanged over fair value of new trust preferred securities and common stock issued. [6] Net of issuance costs of preferred stock exchanged and issuance costs related to exchange and issuance of new common stock. [7] Change in par value from $6.00 to $0.01 (not in thousands). [8] Issuance and subsequent conversion of depository shares representing interests in shares of contingent convertible non-cumulative preferred stock, Series D, into common stock. [9] Issuance costs related to issuance and conversion of depository shares (Preferred Stock - Series D). Disclosure of changes in number of shares: Preferred Stock: Balance at beginning of year Issuance of stocks Exchange of stocks Conversion of stocks Balance at end of year Common Stock - Issued: Balance at beginning of year Issuance of stocks Issuance of stock upon conversion of preferred stock Stocks issued under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan Treasury stock retired Balance at end of year Treasury stock Common Stock - Outstanding 102 Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 2,006,391 1,150,000 [1] – (1,150,000) [1] 2,006,391 639,544,895 50,930 383,333,333 [1] – – 1,022,929,158 (201,356) 1,022,727,802 24,410,000 – (22,403,609) [2] – 7,475,000 16,935,000 [4] – – 2,006,391 24,410,000 295,632,080 357,510,076 [3] – – (13,597,261) 639,544,895 (4,790) 639,540,105 293,651,398 – – 1,980,682 – 295,632,080 (13,627,367) 282,004,713 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. [1] Issuance of 46,000,000 in depositary shares; converted into 383,333,333 common shares (full conversion of depositary shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in shares of contingent convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock). [2] Exchange of 21,468,609 Preferred Stock Series A and B for common shares, and exchange of 935,000 Preferred Stock Series C for trust preferred securities. [3] Shares issued in exchange of Series A and B Preferred Stock and early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock). [4] Issuance of 2008 Series B Preferred Stock (16,000,000) and 2008 Series C Preferred Stock (935,000). 103 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (In thousands) Net income (loss) Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: Foreign currency translation adjustment Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss) Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: Income tax benefit Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Year ended December 31, 2010 $137,401 (442) 4,967 (83,149) 83,967 (3,483) (1,228) 964 1,596 21,652 23,248 $160,649 2009 ($573,919) (1,608) – 132,423 27,223 (173,107) (1,419) 6,915 (9,573) 9,193 (380) ($574,299) Tax effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss): (In thousands) Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss) Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) Income tax benefit Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive loss: (In thousands) Foreign currency translation adjustment Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans Tax effect Net of tax amount Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale Tax effect Net of tax amount Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges Tax effect Net of tax amount Accumulated other comprehensive loss The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. 2010 $32,289 (11,275) 535 479 (376) $21,652 2010 ($36,151) (210,935) 80,855 (130,080) 184,574 (24,874) 159,700 935 (365) 570 ($5,961) Year ended December 31, 2009 ($51,075) (1,306) 62,790 553 (1,769) $9,193 Year ended December 31, 2009 ($40,676) (127,786) 48,566 (79,220) 104,090 (14,134) 89,956 1,199 (468) 731 ($29,209) 2008 ($1,243,903) (4,480) – (209,070) 237,837 (14,955) (3,522) 2,840 8,650 9,333 17,983 ($1,255,920) 2008 $79,533 (71,934) 2,266 579 (1,111) $9,333 2008 ($39,068) (260,209) 99,641 (160,568) 249,974 (75,618) 174,356 (4,297) 748 (3,549) ($28,829) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 104 105 105 120 124 125 125 125 126 130 132 140 144 144 144 148 148 150 150 151 152 153 153 155 156 158 159 160 160 167 170 170 173 176 178 181 182 189 191 191 195 195 Note 1 - Nature of Operations Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Note 3 - Business Combination Note 4 - Sale of Processing and Technology Business Note 5 - Discontinued Operations Note 6 - Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Highly Liquid Securities Note 7 - Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell Note 8 - Investment Securities Available-For-Sale Note 9 - Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity Note 10 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses Note 11 - Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights Note 12 - Premises and Equipment Note 13 - Other Assets Note 14 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Note 15 - Pledged Assets Note 16 - Related Party Transactions Note 17 - Deposits Note 18 - Federal Funds Purchased and Assets Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase Note 19 - Other Short-term Borrowings Note 20 - Notes Payable Note 21 - Unused Lines of Credit and Other Funding Sources Note 22 - Exchange Offers Note 23 - Trust Preferred Securities Note 24 - Stockholders’ Equity Note 25 - Regulatory Capital Requirements Note 26 - Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Note 27 - Other Service Fees Note 28 - Employee Benefits Note 29 - Stock-Based Compensation Note 30 - Rental Expense and Commitments Note 31 - Income Taxes Note 32 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Note 33 - Guarantees Note 34 - Commitments and Contingencies Note 35 - Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities Note 36 - Fair Value Measurement Note 37 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments Note 38 - Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Note 39 - Segment Reporting Note 40 - Subsequent Events Note 41 - Popular, Inc. (Holding company only) Financial Information Note 42 - Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities 199 105 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT In Puerto Rico, Note 1 - Nature of Operations: The Corporation is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin America. the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker- dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Note 39 to the consolidated financial the presents statements Corporation’s business segments. information about impacted transactions Two major the Corporation’s operations during 2010. On April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico (“Westernbank”), a Puerto Rico state-chartered bank headquartered in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (the “Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction”). Westernbank was a wholly-owned commercial bank subsidiary of W Holding Company, Inc. and operated in Puerto Rico. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on this business combination. On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including the Corporation’s merchant acquiring and processing and technology businesses (the “EVERTEC transaction”), and continues to hold the remaining 49% ownership interest in the business. Refer to for a Note 4 to the consolidated financial description of the EVERTEC transaction. EVERTEC provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, and continues to service many of Popular’s transactional subsidiaries’ processing businesses. EVERTEC owns the ATH network connecting the automated teller machines (“ATMs”) of various financial institutions throughout Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands. system infrastructures statements and Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: The accounting and financial reporting policies of Popular, Inc. conform with and its accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with prevailing practices within the financial services industry. “Corporation”) subsidiaries (the The following is a description of the most significant of these policies: Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In accordance with the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities, the Corporation would also consolidate any variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which it has a controlling financial interest and therefore is the primary beneficiary. Assets held in a fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Corporation and, accordingly, are not included in the consolidated statements of condition. Unconsolidated investments, in which there is at least 20% ownership, are generally accounted for by the equity method, with earnings recorded in other operating income. These investments are included in other assets and the Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss is included in other operating income. Those investments in which there is less than 20% ownership, are generally carried under the cost method of accounting, unless significant influence is exercised. Under the cost method, the Corporation recognizes income when dividends are received. Limited partnerships are accounted for by the equity method unless the investor’s interest is so “minor” that the limited partner may have virtually no influence over partnership operating and financial policies. Statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned by the Corporation and are issuers of trust preferred securities are not consolidated in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Business combinations Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method. Under this method, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date are measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The acquisition date is the date the acquirer obtains control. Also, assets or liabilities arising from noncontractual contingencies are measured at their acquisition date at fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of an asset or liability. Adjustments subsequently made to the provisional amounts result of new recorded on the information obtained about that existed as of the acquisition date but were known to the Corporation after acquisition will be made retroactively during a measurement period not to exceed one year. Furthermore, acquisition-related restructuring costs that do not meet certain criteria of exit or disposal activities are expensed as incurred. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. Changes in income tax valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets are recognized in earnings subsequent to the measurement period as an adjustment to income tax expense. Refer to Note 3 to the a facts and circumstances acquisition date as 106 servicing presented, while mortgage rights, which are accounted for at fair value, are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition. Such reclassification did not have an effect on previously reported cash flows, shareholders’ equity or net income. Fair Value Measurements The Corporation determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value framework established in the guidance for Fair Value Measurements in ASC Subtopic 820-10, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value which are (1) quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets, (2) observable are market-based corroborated by market data, and (3) unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. or unobservable inputs inputs that The guidance in ASC Subtopic 820-10 also addresses measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. Transactions or quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be determinative of fair value when transactions are not orderly, and thus, may require adjustments to estimate fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value, and the weight given is based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not available to determine if price quotes are based on orderly transactions, less weight should be given to the price quote relative to other transactions that are known to be orderly. Covered Assets Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are labeled “covered” on the consolidated statement of condition and include certain loans and other real estate properties. Loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, are considered “covered loans” because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any future losses on these loans subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. consolidated financial information on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which was accounted for as a business combination. statements for Deconsolidation of a Subsidiary The Corporation accounts for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary when it ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Accordingly, it recognizes a gain or loss in results of operations measured as the difference between the sum of the fair value of the consideration received, the fair value of any retained non-controlling investment in the former subsidiary and the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest in the former subsidiary, as compared with the carrying amount of the former subsidiary’s assets and liabilities. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial information on the Corporation’s sale of a majority interest in EVERTEC and the impact of deconsolidating this former wholly-owned subsidiary. statements for Discontinued operations Components of the Corporation that have been or will be disposed of by sale, where the Corporation does not have a significant continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal, are accounted for as discontinued operations. The financial results of Popular Financial Holdings (“PFH”) are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Prior to the discontinuance of the business, PFH was considered a reportable segment. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on PFH’s discontinued operations. allocations of The results of operations of the discontinued operations exclude interest expense allocated to the discontinued operations is based on legal entity, which considers a transfer pricing allocation for intercompany funding. corporate overhead. The Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements to conform with the 2010 presentation. Servicing rights related to commercial loans (Small Business Administration), which are accounted for under the amortization method, have been reclassified to other assets in all periods 107 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Investment securities Investment securities are classified in four categories and accounted for as follows: is k Debt securities that the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as securities held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. The Corporation may not sell or transfer held-to-maturity securities without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity, unless a nonrecurring or that could not have been reasonably unusual event anticipated has occurred. An investment in debt securities is considered impaired if the fair value of the amortized cost. For than its investment less other-than-temporary the Corporation impairments assess if it has both the intent and the ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in its fair value to its amortized cost. For other-than-temporary impairment not related to a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) for a held-to-maturity security is recognized in other comprehensive loss and amortized over security. The amortized cost basis for a debt security is adjusted by the credit loss amount of other-than-temporary impairments. the remaining life of the debt k Debt and equity securities classified as trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in non-interest income. k Debt and equity securities (equity securities with readily available fair value) not classified as either securities held-to-maturity or trading securities are classified as securities available-for-sale and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported, net of in accumulated other taxes, comprehensive income or loss. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, which are included in net gains or losses on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities in the consolidated statements of operations. Declines in the value of debt and equity securities that are considered other-than-temporary reduce the value of the asset, and the estimated loss is recorded in non-interest income. For debt securities, the Corporation assesses whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these an other-than-temporary impairment on the security is recognized. In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it conditions is met, is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), the impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of operations. The amount of impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive loss. The other-than-temporary impairment analysis for both debt and equity securities are performed on a quarterly basis. the total to impairment k Investments in equity or other securities that do not have readily available fair values are classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statements of testing if condition, and are subject applicable. These securities are stated at the lower of cost or realizable value. The source of this value varies according to the nature of the investment, and is primarily obtained by the Corporation from valuation analyses prepared by third-parties or from information derived from financial statements available for the corresponding venture capital and mutual funds. Stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with regulatory requirements, such as Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, is included in this category, and their realizable value equals their cost. The amortization of premiums is deducted and the accretion of discounts is added to net interest income based on the interest method over the outstanding period of the related securities. The cost of securities sold is determined by specific identification. Net realized gains or losses on sales of investment securities and valuation unrealized considered adjustments if any, on securities available-for-sale, other-than-temporary, held-to-maturity are determined using the specific identification method and are reported separately of operations. Purchases and sales of securities are recognized on a trade date basis. consolidated statements investment securities in the other loss and Derivative financial instruments The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments as part of its overall interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. All derivatives are recognized on the statement of condition at fair value. The Corporation’s policy is not to offset the fair value amounts instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement nor to offset the fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation recognized for multiple derivative 108 to return cash collateral (a payable) arising from the same master netting arrangement as the derivative instruments. When the Corporation enters into a derivative contract, the derivative instrument is designated as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or as a free-standing derivative instrument. For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in current period earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to net income (loss) in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction impacts earnings. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges immediately recognized in current earnings. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in the fair values are reported in current period earnings. is the includes documents relationship and strategy for undertaking to specific forecasted transactions or Prior to entering a hedge transaction, the Corporation formally between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management various hedge objective transactions. This process linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the statement of condition or firm commitments along with a formal assessment, at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the derivative instrument is not highly effective as a hedge, a derivative expires, is sold, terminated, when it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur or when it is determined that is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued the derivative continues to be carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. For non-exchange traded contracts, fair value is based on flow the significant pricing models, quotes, dealer similar or methodologies, determination fair of management judgment or estimation. cash for which value may discounted techniques require The fair value of derivative instruments considers the risk of nonperformance by the counterparty or the Corporation, as applicable. The Corporation obtains or pledges collateral in connection the with its derivative activities when applicable under agreement. Loans Loans are classified as loans held-in-portfolio when management has the intent and ability to hold the loan for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoff. The foreseeable future is a management judgment which is determined based upon the type to sell or securitize, of loan, business strategies, current market conditions, balance sheet management and liquidity needs. Management’s view of the foreseeable future may change based on changes in these conditions. When a decision is made to sell or securitize a loan that was not originated or initially acquired with the intent the loan is reclassified from held-in-portfolio into held-for-sale. Due to changing market conditions or other strategic initiatives, management’s intent with respect to the disposition of the loan may change, and accordingly, loans previously classified as held-for-sale may be reclassified into held-in-portfolio. Loans transferred between loans held-for-sale and held-in-portfolio classifications are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value at the date of transfer. Loans held-for-sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value, cost being determined based on the outstanding loan balance less unearned income, and fair value determined, generally in the aggregate. Fair value is measured based on current market prices for similar loans, outstanding investor commitments, bids received from potential purchasers, prices of recent sales or discounted cash flow analyses which utilize inputs and assumptions which are believed to be consistent with market participants’ views. The cost basis also includes consideration of deferred origination fees and costs, which are recognized in earnings sale. Upon reclassification to held-for-sale, credit related fair value adjustments are recorded as a reduction in the allowance for loan losses (ALLL). To the extent that the loan’s reduction in value has not already been provided for in the allowance for loan losses, an additional loan loss provision is recorded. Subsequent to reclassification to held-for-sale, the amount, by which cost exceeds fair value, if any, is accounted for as a valuation allowance with changes therein included in the determination of net income (loss) for the period in which the change occurs. time of the at Loans held-in-portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and amortized using the interest method or a method which approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. Grace periods allowed by the Corporation after a loan technically has become past due, but before the imposition of late charges, are not to be taken into account in determining past due status. Furthermore, loans are reported as past due when either interest or principal remains unpaid for 30 days or more in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. Non-accrual loans are those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any interest previously recognized and not collected is generally reversed from current earnings. 109 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT of the interest the excess of fourth quarter Recognition of income on commercial in which such excess was 2010, in the case of collateral dependent impairment, and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past loans due. However, the individually evaluated for recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral is generally promptly (portion deemed as uncollectible) later than the quarter charged-off, but in any event not following the quarter first the recognized. During Corporation charged-off $210 million of impaired commercial and construction loans as a result of charging-off collateral dependent loans more promptly consistent with regulatory guidelines in the current economic environment. Recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is discontinued when 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portions on mortgage loans are interest charged-off at 180 days past due. Recognition of income on closed-end consumer loans and home equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Closed-end consumer loans and leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end (revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when 180 days in arrears. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) are reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after classified as a TDR). Certain loans which would be treated as non-accrual loans pursuant to the foregoing policy are treated as accruing loans if they are considered well-secured and in the process of collection. Once a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the interest previously accrued and uncollected is charged against current earnings and thereafter income is recorded only to the extent of any interest collected. Loans designated as non-accruing are returned to an accrual status when the Corporation expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest. Lease financing The Corporation leases passenger and commercial vehicles and equipment to individual and corporate customers. The finance method of accounting is used to recognize revenue on lease contracts that meet the criteria specified in the guidance for leases in ASC Topic 840. Aggregate rentals due over the term of the leases less unearned income are included in finance lease contracts receivable. Unearned income is amortized using a method which results in approximate level rates of return on the principal amounts outstanding. Finance lease origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized over the average life of the lease as an adjustment to the interest yield. Revenue for other leases is recognized as it becomes due under the terms of the agreement. Loans acquired in an FDIC-assisted transaction Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. The Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to all loans acquired in Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction (including loans that do not meet scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30), except for credit cards and revolving lines of credit that were expressly scoped out from the application of this guidance since they continued to have revolving privileges after acquisition. Management used its judgment in evaluating factors impacting expected cash flows and probable loss the loan portfolio, assumptions, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions, quality of underwriting standards of the acquired institution, real estate values, among other reductions considerations that could also impact the expected cash inflows on the loans. including the quality of in collateral Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 represent loans showing evidence of credit deterioration and that it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Corporation will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that meet the definition for nonaccrual status fall within the Corporation’s definition of impaired loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. Also, based on the fair value determined for the acquired portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the definition of nonaccrual status also resulted in the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Accordingly, an election was made by the Corporation to apply the accretable yield method (expected cash flow model of ASC Subtopic 310-30), as a loan with credit deterioration and impairment, instead of the standard loan discount accretion guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, for the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. These loans are disclosed as a loan that was acquired with credit deterioration and impairment. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools based on loans that had common risk characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, amortization type, rate the index and source type. Once the pools are defined, Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non- accretable between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the increases in cash flows over those expected at income recognized acquisition prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses. the difference represents difference interest date are as Acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are not considered non-performing and continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be loans charged-off against the non-accretable collected. Also, difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs on loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the non-accretable difference established with purchase accounting. The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20 represents the difference between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. Any cash flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses. Acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. losses inherent Allowance for loan losses The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to in the loan portfolio. This provide for methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on such methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. 110 2009, enhanced the Corporation The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of an allowance for loan losses for groups of homogeneous loans. During reserve assessment of homogeneous loans by establishing a more granular risk loans with characteristics, reducing the historical base loss periods employed, and strengthening the analysis pertaining to the environmental factors considered. The revised segmentation considers portfolio segments and product types, which are further segregated based on their secured or unsecured status. The change in the methodology was implemented as of June 30, 2009. The impact in the Corporation’s allowance and provision for loan losses as a result of each of the changes described above was a decrease of approximately $3.5 million. segmentation similar the of The Corporation’s determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors: k Historical net loss rates (including losses from impaired loans) by loan type and by legal entity adjusted for recent net charge-off trends and environmental factors. The base net loss rates are based on the moving average of annualized loss net charge-offs computed over a 3-year historical window for commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for consumer loan portfolios. k Net charge-off trend factors are applied to adjust the base loss rates based on recent loss trends. In other words, the Corporation applies a trend factor when base losses are below more recent loss trends (last 6 months). The trend factor accounts for inherent imprecision and the “lagging perspective” in base loss rates. In addition, caps and floors for the trend factor mitigate excessive volatility in the adjustment. k Environmental credit factors, which include losses to differ from historical factors on each loan group as and macroeconomic indicators such as employment, price index and construction permits, were adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit loss experience. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental an increases or decreases adjustment that, as appropriate, the historical each group. factors provide updated perspective on Environmental credit conditions. Correlation and regression analyses are used to select and weight these indicators. For non-conventional mortgage loans, the allowance for loan losses is established to cover at least one year of projected losses which are inherent in these portfolios. economic applied loss rate and to 111 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT that According to the accounting guidance criteria for specific impairment of a loan, up to December 31, 2008, the Corporation defined as impaired loans those commercial borrowers with outstanding debt of $250,000 or more and with interest and /or principal 90 days or more past due. Also, specific commercial borrowers with outstanding debt of $500,000 and over were deemed impaired when, based on current information and events, management considered that it was probable that the debtor would be unable to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation continues to apply the same definition except it prospectively increased the threshold of outstanding debt to $1,000,000 for the identification of newly impaired commercial and construction loans. Although the accounting codification guidance for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) be analyzed under its provisions. An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. The Corporation periodically requires updated appraisal reports for loans that are considered impaired. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired. Cash payments received on impaired loans are recorded in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized as interest income. However, when management believes the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is applied to principal. Troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) TDRs represent loans where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that the creditor would not otherwise consider. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. These concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a court. Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of judgment. Indicators that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties include, for example: (i) the debtor is currently in default on any of its debt; (ii) the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the debtor will continue to be a going concern; (iv) currently, the debtor has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; (v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the current business capabilities, the debtor forecasts that its entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and absent the current modification, the debtor cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs are reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after classified as TDR). Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance) and the loan yields a market rate. Reserve for Unfunded Commitments The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. FDIC Loss Share Indemnification Asset The acquisition date fair value of the reimbursement that the Corporation expects to receive from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements is presented as an FDIC loss share indemnification asset on the consolidated statements of condition. Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements. Refer to Note 3 for additional information on the valuation methodology. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable with the assets should the assets be sold. The accounting for the indemnification asset is reciprocal to the accounting for the indemnified asset. The impact of the FDIC loss share indemnification on the Corporation’s results of operations is included in non-interest income, particularly in the category of “FDIC loss share income (expense)”, and considers, among certain criteria, the accretion due to discounting and changes in expected loss sharing reimbursements. reimbursements The indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in income are expected prospectively consistent with the approach taken to recognize increases in cash flows on covered loans. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as of the acquisition date is accreted into income, a reduction of the related indemnification asset is recorded as a reduction in non-interest income. recognized in Increases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that the allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized. Equity Appreciation Instrument The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as an “other liability” in the consolidated statement of condition and any subsequent change in its estimated fair value is recognized in earnings on each reporting date. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC. Transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities The transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset in which the Corporation surrenders control over the assets is accounted for as a sale if all of the following conditions set forth in ASC Topic 860 are met: (1) the assets must be isolated from creditors of the transferor, (2) the transferee must obtain the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the transferor cannot maintain effective control over through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the Corporation is prevented from and the transferred financial derecognizing transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. For federal and Puerto Rico income tax purposes, the Corporation treats the transfers of loans which do not qualify as “true sales” under the applicable accounting guidance, as sales, recognizing a deferred tax asset or liability on the transaction. the transferred assets these criteria, assets the For transfers of financial assets that satisfy the conditions to be accounted for as sales, the Corporation derecognizes all assets sold; recognizes all assets obtained and liabilities incurred in consideration as proceeds of the sale, including servicing assets and servicing liabilities, if applicable; initially measures at fair value assets obtained and liabilities incurred in a sale; and recognizes in earnings any gain or loss on the sale. The guidance on transfer of financial assets requires a true sale analysis of the treatment of the transfer under state law as if the Corporation was a debtor under the bankruptcy code. A true sale 112 legal analysis includes several legally relevant factors, such as the nature and level of recourse to the transferor, and the nature of retained interests in the loans sold. The analytical conclusion as to a true sale is never absolute and unconditional, but contains qualifications based on the inherent equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, as well as the unsettled state of the common law. Once the legal isolation test has been met, other factors concerning the nature and extent of the transferor’s control over the transferred assets are taken into account in order to determine whether derecognition of assets is warranted. The Corporation sells mortgage loans to the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) in the normal course of business and retains the servicing rights. The GNMA programs under which the loans are sold allow the Corporation to repurchase individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria. At the Corporation’s option, and without GNMA’s the Corporation may repurchase the prior authorization, delinquent loan for an amount equal to 100% of the remaining principal balance of the loan. Once the Corporation has the unconditional ability to repurchase the delinquent loan, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over the loan and recognizes the loan on its balance sheet as well as an offsetting liability, regardless of the Corporation’s intent to repurchase the loan. Servicing assets The Corporation periodically sells or securitizes loans while retaining the obligation to perform the servicing of such loans. In addition, the Corporation may purchase or assume the right to service loans originated by others. Whenever the Corporation undertakes an obligation to service a loan, management assesses whether a servicing asset or liability should be recognized. A servicing asset is recognized whenever the compensation for servicing is expected to more than adequately compensate the servicer for performing the servicing. Likewise, a servicing liability would be recognized in the event that servicing fees to be received are not expected to adequately compensate the Corporation for its expected cost. Mortgage servicing assets recorded at fair value are separately presented on the consolidated statement of condition. All (“SBA”) separately recognized servicing assets are initially fair value. For subsequent measurement of recognized at servicing rights, the Corporation has elected the fair value method for mortgage loans servicing rights (“MSRs”) while all other servicing assets, particularly those related to Small Business follow the Administration the fair value measurement amortization method. Under method, MSRs are recorded at fair value each reporting period, and changes in fair value are reported in other service fees in the consolidated statement of operations. Under the amortization method, amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated servicing income, and assessed for impairment based on fair value at servicing assets commercial loans, are 113 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT fees, and late each reporting period. Contractual servicing fees including ancillary income fair value adjustments, and impairment losses, if any, are reported in other service fees in the consolidated statement of operations. Loan servicing fees, which are based on a percentage of the principal balances of the loans serviced, are credited to income as loan payments are collected. as well as The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net taking into consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. servicing cash flows, For purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing assets that are accounted under the amortization method, the amount of impairment recognized, if any, is the amount by which the capitalized servicing assets per stratum exceed their estimated fair value. Temporary impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance with changes included in results of operations for the period in which the change occurs. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a particular stratum, the valuation allowance is reduced through a recovery in earnings. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not recognized. Servicing rights subsequently accounted under the amortization method are also reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment. When the recoverability of an impaired servicing asset accounted under the the amortization method is determined to be remote, unrecoverable portion of the valuation allowance is applied as a direct write-down to the carrying value of the servicing rights, precluding subsequent recoveries. Premises and equipment Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each type of asset. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed over the terms of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Costs of maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings as realized or incurred, respectively. The Corporation capitalizes interest cost incurred in the construction of significant real estate projects, which consist primarily of facilities for its own use or intended for lease. The amount of interest cost capitalized is to be an allocation of the interest cost incurred during the period required to substantially complete the asset. The interest rate for capitalization purposes is to be based on a weighted average rate on the Corporation’s outstanding borrowings, unless there is a specific new borrowing associated with the asset. Interest cost capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was not significant. The Corporation has operating lease arrangements primarily associated with the rental of premises to support its branch these network or arrangements rent escalations and renewal options. for general office are non-cancelable space. Certain of for and provide Rent expense on non-cancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Impairment of long-lived assets The Corporation evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Restructuring costs A liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. If future service is required for employees to receive the one-time termination benefit, the liability is initially measured at the termination date and recognized over the future service period. its fair value as of Other real estate Other real estate, received in satisfaction of debt, is recorded at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or the appraised value less estimated costs of disposal of the real estate acquired, which approximates fair value, by charging the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, any losses in the carrying value arising from periodic reevaluations of the properties, and any gains or losses on the sale of these properties are credited or charged to expense in the period incurred and are included as a component of other operating expenses. The cost of maintaining and operating such properties is expensed as incurred. It is the Corporation’s policy to require updated appraisals for commercial and construction other real estate properties over $3 million at least annually. Cases between $1 million to $3 million need to be reappraised at least every 24 months. For loans secured by residential real estate properties (mortgage loans) and following the requirements of the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a current assessment of value is made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding loan balance in excess of the estimated value of the property, less cost to sell, is charged- off. For this purpose and for residential real estate properties, the Corporation requests independent broker price opinions of value of the subject collateral property periodically depending on the delinquency status of the loans. Goodwill and other intangible assets Goodwill is recognized when the purchase price is higher than the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations is not under the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment using a two-step process at each reporting unit level. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, the goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If needed, the second step consists of comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of methods, which include market price multiples of comparable companies and the discounted cash flow analysis. Goodwill impairment losses are recorded as part of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. Other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but are tested for impairment using a one-step process which compares the fair value with the carrying amount of the asset. In determining that an intangible asset has an the Corporation considers expected cash indefinite life, inflows competitive, economic and other factors, which could limit the intangible asset’s useful life. contractual, regulatory, legal, and Other identifiable intangible assets with a finite useful life, mainly core deposits, are amortized using various methods over the periods benefited, which range from 3 to 11 years. These intangibles are evaluated periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments on intangible assets with a finite useful life are evaluated under the guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and are included as part of “Impairment losses on long-lived assets” in the category of operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Bank-Owned Life Insurance Bank-owned life insurance represents life insurance on the lives of certain employees who have provided positive consent allowing the Corporation to be the beneficiary of the policy. Bank-owned life insurance policies are carried at their cash surrender value. The Corporation recognizes income from the periodic increases in the cash surrender value of the policy, as well as insurance proceeds received, which are recorded as other operating income, and are not subject to income taxes. The cash surrender value and any additional amounts provided by the the bank-owned insurance policy that are realizable at the balance sheet date contractual terms of 114 are considered in determining the amount that could be realized, and any amounts that are not immediately payable to the policyholder in cash are discounted to their present value. In determining “the amount that could be realized,” it is assumed that policies will be surrendered on an individual-by-individual basis. Assets sold / purchased under agreements to repurchase / resell Repurchase and resell agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the assets will be subsequently reacquired or resold as specified in the respective agreements. to under agreements resell. However, It is the Corporation’s policy to take possession of securities purchased the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities, and accordingly those securities are not reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition. The Corporation monitors the fair value of the underlying securities as compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest. It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of condition. The Corporation may require counterparties to deposit return collateral pledged, when collateral or additional appropriate. stated at cost, Software Capitalized software is less accumulated amortization. Capitalized software includes purchased software and capitalizable application development costs associated with internally-developed software. Amortization, computed on a straight-line method, the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalized software is included in “Other assets” in the consolidated statement of condition. is charged to operations over Guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others The Corporation, as a guarantor, recognizes at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for further disclosures on guarantees. Accounting considerations related to the cumulative preferred stock and warrant to purchase shares of common stock The value of the warrant to purchase shares of common stock was received by the determined by allocating the proceeds the Corporation based on the fair values of relative 115 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT instruments issued (preferred stock and warrant). The transaction was recorded when it was consummated and proceeds were received. Refer to Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the warrant issued in 2008. Warrants issued are included in the calculation of average diluted shares in determining income (loss) per common share using the treasury stock method. The discount on increasing rate preferred stock was amortized over the period preceding commencement of the perpetual dividend by charging an imputed dividend cost against retained earnings. The amortization of the discount on the preferred shares also reduced the income (or increased the loss) applicable to common stockholders in the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share. Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders considers the deduction of both the dividends declared in the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income (loss) from continuing operations and also from net income (loss). Accounting considerations related to the redemption of cumulative preferred stock and redemption of the trust preferred securities The Corporation applied the guidance in ASC Subsection 260-10-S99 (formerly EITF Topic D-42 “The effect on the calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock”) for the redemption of cumulative preferred stock, which indicates that the difference between (1) the fair value of the consideration transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and (2) the carrying amount of the preferred stock in the registrant’s balance sheet (net of issuance costs) be subtracted from (or added to) net income to arrive at income available to common stockholders in the calculation of net income (loss) per common share. the Corporation’s The Corporation treated the redemption of the trust preferred securities as an extinguishment of debt pursuant to the guidance in ASC Subsection 470-50-40 which indicates that the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt be recognized as gain or loss on extinguishment in the results of operations. Accounting considerations related to the issuance and conversion of depositary shares contingently convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock The contingently convertible perpetual cumulative shares of preferred stock contained a beneficial conversion feature that must be settled in shares of Corporation’s common stock. According to ASC 470-20-25-5, an embedded beneficial conversion feature present in a convertible instrument shall be recognized separately at issuance by allocating a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid-in capital. A contingent beneficial conversion feature was measured using the commitment date stock price. The allocation of the intrinsic value to additional paid-in capital gave rise to a preferred stock discount which should be amortized as a deemed dividend on the preferred stocks through retained earnings. Once the contingency is resolved the entire preferred stock discount is amortized through retained earnings. However, since at the time the preferred stocks are recognized the contingency is already resolved, the entire intrinsic value was allocated to retained earnings and the recognition of the preferred stock discount was not necessary. The intrinsic value was calculated at the commitment date as the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock multiplied by the number of shares into which the security was convertible as indicated in ASC 470-20-30-6. The excess of the fair value of securities issued over the fair value of securities issuable under the original contractual conversion terms, which would be an excess consideration, represents a return to preferred stock shareholders. The excess in the computation of basic and consideration is deducted, dilutive earnings per share, from net income in arriving at net income applicable to common shareholders. Treasury stock Treasury stock is recorded at cost and is carried as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated statements of condition. At the date of retirement or subsequent reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock. At retirement, the excess of the cost of the treasury stock over its par value is recorded entirely to surplus. At reissuance, the difference between the consideration received upon issuance and the specific cost is charged or credited to surplus. Income and expense recognition - Processing business Revenue from information processing and other services is recognized at the time services are rendered. Rental and maintenance service revenue is recognized ratably over the corresponding contractual periods. Revenue from software and hardware sales and related costs is recognized at the time software and equipment is installed or delivered depending on the contractual terms. Revenue from contracts to create data processing centers and the related cost is recognized as project phases are completed and accepted. Operating expenses are recognized as incurred. Project expenses are deferred and earned. The recognized when the Corporation applies the guidance in ASC Subtopic 605-35 as the guidance to determine what project expenses must be deferred until the related income is earned on certain long- term projects that involve the outsourcing of technological services. related income is Income Recognition - Insurance agency business Commissions and fees are recognized when related policies are effective. Additional premiums and rate adjustments are recorded as they occur. Contingent commissions are recorded on the accrual basis when the amount to be received is notified by the insurance company. Commission income from advance business is deferred. An allowance is created for expected to policy adjustments cancellations. to commissions earned relating Income Recognition - Investment banking revenues Investment banking revenue is recorded as follows: underwriting fees at the time the underwriting is completed and income is reasonably determinable; corporate finance advisory fees as earned, according to the terms of the specific contracts; and sales commissions on a trade-date basis. Foreign exchange Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars using prevailing rates of exchange at the end of the period. Revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated using weighted average rates for the period. The resulting from operations for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), except for highly inflationary environments in which the effects are included in other operating expenses. translation adjustment foreign currency The Corporation holds interests in Consorcio de Tarjetas (“CONTADO”) and Centro Financiero Dominicanas, S.A. BHD, S.A. (“BHD”) in the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these businesses are conducted in the country’s foreign currency. Popular, Inc. also operates in Venezuela through its wholly-owned subsidiary Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A. (formerly EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A.) (Red Tranred). On January 7, 2010, Venezuela’s National Consumer Price Index (“NCPI”) for December 2009 was released. The cumulative three-year inflation rates for both of Venezuela’s inflation indices were over 100 percent. The Corporation began considering Venezuela’s economy as highly inflationary as of January 1, 2010, and the financial statements of Red Tranred were remeasured as if the functional currency was the reporting currency as of such date. ASC Paragraph 830-10-45-11 defines a highly inflationary economy as one with a cumulative inflation rate of approximately 100 percent or more over a three-year period. Under ASC Topic 830, if a country’s economy is classified as highly inflationary, the functional currency of the foreign entity operating in that country must be remeasured to the functional currency of the reporting entity. The unfavorable impact of remeasuring the financial statements of Red Tranred at December 31, 2010, was approximately $1.9 million. Total assets for Red Tranred remeasured approximated $8.9 million at December 31, 2010. 116 Refer to the disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the outstanding balances of unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustments at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. tax assets and liabilities Income taxes The Corporation recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income are determined for differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The computation is based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The guidance for income taxes requires a reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically by the Corporation based on the more likely than not realization threshold criterion. a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax including the future reversal of existing temporary asset, differences, the future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies. In making such assessments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. assessment In the for The valuation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or tax returns and future profitability. The Corporation’s accounting for deferred tax consequences represents management’s best estimate of those future events. to by taxing challenge Such tax positions Positions taken in the Corporation’s tax returns may be authorities upon the subject examination. Uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax and authorities. subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest on income tax uncertainties is classified within income tax expense in the statement of operations; while the penalties, if any, are accounted for as other operating expenses. are both initially is greater 117 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The Corporation accounts for the taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues). Income tax expense or benefit for the year is allocated among continuing operations, discontinued operations, and other comprehensive income, as applicable. The amount allocated to continuing operations is the tax effect of the pretax income or loss from continuing operations that occurred during the year, plus or minus income tax effects of (a) changes in circumstances that cause a change in judgment about the realization of deferred tax assets in future years, (b) changes in tax laws or rates, (c) changes in tax status, and (d) tax-deductible dividends paid to shareholders, subject to certain exceptions. Employees’ retirement and other postretirement benefit plans Pension costs are computed on the basis of accepted actuarial methods and are charged to current operations. Net pension costs are based on various actuarial assumptions regarding future experience under the plan, which include costs for services rendered during the period, interest costs and return on plan assets, as well as deferral and amortization of certain items such as actuarial gains or losses. The funding policy is to contribute to the plan as necessary to provide for services to date and for those expected to be earned in the future. To the extent that these requirements are fully covered by assets in the plan, a contribution may not be made in a particular year. The cost of postretirement benefits, which is determined based on actuarial assumptions and estimates of the costs of providing these benefits in the future, is accrued during the years that the employee renders the required service. The guidance for compensation retirement benefits of ASC Topic 715 requires the recognition of the funded status of each defined pension benefit plan, retiree health care and other postretirement benefit plans on the statement of condition. Stock-based compensation The Corporation opted to use the fair value method of recording stock-based compensation as described in the guidance for employee share plans in ASC Subtopic 718-50. Comprehensive income (loss) Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The presentation of comprehensive income (loss) is included in separate consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Net income (loss) per common share Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing income (loss) adjusted for preferred stock dividends, net including undeclared or unpaid dividends if cumulative, and charges or credits related to the extinguishment of preferred stock or induced conversions of preferred stock, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income per common share take into consideration the weighted average common shares adjusted for the effect of stock options, restricted stock and warrants on common stock, using the treasury stock method. Statement of cash flows For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash includes cash on hand and amounts due from banks. and includes financial Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“ASU 2009-16”) ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the concept of a qualifying special- purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets, changes the requirements for additional assets, derecognizing disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or third-party beneficial the meaning of the term participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating as defined in ASC paragraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance was adopted and has been applied as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that began on January 1, 2010, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and will be applied for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The recognition and measurement provisions have been applied to transfers that have occurred on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date, existing qualifying special-purpose entities have been evaluated for consolidation in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation evaluated transfers of financial assets executed during the year ended December 31, 2010 pursuant to the new accounting guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage securitizations (Government National Mortgage Association interests, and the addition of interests (“GNMA”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s accounting for such transactions or results of operations or financial condition for such period. is accounted for as a sale. Control A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control over the transferred assets and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1) the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the assets; and (3) the transferor no longer maintains effective control over the assets. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset that meets the requirements for sale accounting; or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured borrowing. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) - Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2009-17”) and FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (“ASU 2010-10”) ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and changes how a reporting entity determines is insufficiently capitalized or is not when an entity that controlled through voting (or should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a) a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which entity has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses similar rights) 118 the entity that most significantly impact of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the activities of the It also requires ongoing entity’s economic performance. is the assessments of whether a variable interest holder primary beneficiary of a VIE. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affected all entities that were within the scope of the original guidance, as well as qualifying special- purpose entities (“QSPEs”) that were previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on VIEs did not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption. The principal VIEs evaluated by the Corporation during the year ended December 31, 2010 included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which management has concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management believes that the Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements). Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU 2009-17 for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the “Investment Company Guide”). The FASB also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure requirements in ASU 2009-17. Upon adoption of the new guidance, the Corporation has not been required to consolidate any previously unconsolidated VIEs 119 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT for which it has a variable interest at December 31, 2010. Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for required disclosures guaranteed mortgage securitizations in which the Corporation holds a variable interest. associated with the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”) ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts disclosures only and has not nor will it have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. The Corporation’s disclosures about fair value measurements are presented in Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (“ASU 2010-11”) ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. The type of credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The amendments in ASU 2010-11 were effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance has not had a significant effect, if any, on its consolidated financial statements since the Corporation has not held any embedded credit derivatives since the effective date of this Update. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (“ASU 2010-18”) The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that those loans after subsequently modifies one or more of acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under ASC Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within ASC Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 were effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments were required to be applied prospectively. Upon initial adoption of the guidance in ASU 2010-18, an entity could have made a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30. This election could have been applied on a pool-by-pool basis and did not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions loans with credit deterioration. Early application was of permitted and the Corporation elected to early adopt the provisions of this statement, effective with the closing of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010. As a result, the accounting for modified loans follows the guidelines of ASU 2010-18; however, the adoption of these provisions did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s result of operations or financial position at December 31, 2010. Receivables - Troubled Subtopic 310-40, FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ASU 2010-20”) ASU 2010-20, issued in July 2010, expands disclosure requirements about the credit quality of financing receivables losses. Refer to Note 10 to the and allowance for credit consolidated financial statements for new required disclosures for the year ended December 31, 2010. 120 FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-01, Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20 The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-01 in January 2011, which temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20 for public entities. The effective date of the new restructurings for public disclosures about entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. restructuring will troubled debt then be FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts The amendments in this ASU, issued in December 2010, modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Corporation does not anticipate that this guidance will have an effect on its consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations The FASB issued ASU 2010-29 in December 2010. The amendments in this ASU affect any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should the combined entity as disclose revenue and earnings of though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The for are effective prospectively amendments business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance impacts disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. Note 3 - Business Combination: As indicated in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements, on April 30, 2010, the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, BPPR, acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits and liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico from the FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank, in an assisted transaction. BPPR acquired approximately $9.1 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.4 billion in deposits, excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments. As part of the transaction, on April 30, 2010, BPPR issued a five-year $5.8 billion note payable to the FDIC bearing a fixed annual interest rate of 2.50%. The note is secured by a substantial amount of the assets, including loans and foreclosed other real estate properties acquired by BPPR from the FDIC in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, and which are subject sharing agreements. In addition, as part of the consideration for the equity transaction, appreciation instrument, which is described in detail below. the FDIC received to the loss cash-settled a Loss Sharing Agreements In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC with respect to approximately $8.6 billion of loans and other real estate (the “covered assets”). Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC sharing paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under agreements. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single- family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above. the loss In addition, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (the “True-Up Measurement Date”) of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment is recorded as a reduction in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset. Under 121 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million)(as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve- to and ending on the True-Up month period prior Measurement Date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%). Covered loans under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (the “covered loans”) are reported in loans exclusive of the estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The covered loans acquired in the Westernbank transaction are, and will reviewed for collectability. Under ASC continue to be, Subtopic 310-30, if there is a decrease in the expected cash flows on loans due to an increase in estimated credit losses compared to the estimate made at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, the Corporation will record a charge to the provision for loan losses and an allowance for loan losses will be established. If there is an increase in inherent losses on the loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, an allowance for loan losses will be established to record the loans at their net realizable value. A related credit to income and an increase in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset will be recognized at the same time, measured based on the loss share percentages described above, for ASC Subtopic 310-20 and 310-30 loans. The operating results of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 include the operating results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed for the period of May 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The Corporation believes that given the nature of assets and liabilities assumed, the significant fair value adjustments, the nature of additional amount of consideration provided to the FDIC (note payable and equity appreciation instrument) and the FDIC loss sharing agreements now in place, historical results of Westernbank are not meaningful to the Corporation’s results, and thus no pro forma information is presented. The following table presents the fair values of major classes of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Corporation as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date. (In thousands) Assets: Cash and money market investments Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock Loans FDIC loss share indemnification asset Covered other real estate owned Core deposit intangible Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note issued to the FDIC) Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium of $12,411 resulting from the fair value adjustment) Equity appreciation instrument Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments Accrued expenses and other liabilities Total liabilities Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed Aggregate fair value adjustments Aggregate additional consideration, net Goodwill on acquisition Book value prior to purchase accounting adjustments Fair value adjustments Additional consideration As recorded by Popular, Inc. on April 30, 2010 $358,132 58,610 8,554,744 – 125,947 – – 44,926 – – $(3,354,287) 2,337,748 (73,867) 24,415 – – $9,142,359 $(1,065,991) – – – – – – $111,101 – $111,101 $358,132 58,610 5,200,457 2,337,748 52,080 24,415 111,101 44,926 $8,187,469 $2,380,170 – – – 13,925 $2,394,095 $6,748,264 $11,465 – – 45,755 – $57,220 – – – – $(1,123,211) – – – $2,391,635 $5,770,495 52,500 – – $5,822,995 – – $5,711,894 5,770,495 52,500 45,755 13,925 $8,274,310 – – – – $86,841 122 During the fourth quarter of 2010, retrospective adjustments were made to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction to reflect new information obtained during the measurement period (as defined by ASC Topic 805), about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the acquisition-date fair value measurements. The retrospective adjustments were mostly driven by refinements in credit loss assumptions because of new information that became available. The revisions principally resulted in a decrease in the estimated credit losses, thus increasing the fair value of acquired loans and reducing the FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available, and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease. The following table presents the principal changes in fair value as previously reported in Form 10-Qs filed during 2010 and the revised amounts recorded during the measurement period with general explanations of the major changes. (In thousands) Assets: Loans Less: Discount Net loans FDIC loss share indemnification asset Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Note issued to the FDIC Equity appreciation instrument Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments Other liabilities Total liabilities April 30, 2010 As recasted [a] April 30, 2010 As previously reported [b] $8,554,744 (3,354,287) 5,200,457 2,337,748 86,841 649,264 $8,554,744 (4,293,756) 4,260,988 3,322,561 106,230 670,419 Change – $939,469 [c] 939,469 (984,813) [d] (19,389) (21,155) [e] $8,274,310 $8,360,198 $(85,888) $2,391,635 5,770,495 52,500 45,755 13,925 $8,274,310 $2,391,635 5,769,696 52,500 132,442 13,925 $8,360,198 – $799 [f] – (86,687) [g] – ($85,888) [a] Amounts reported include retrospective adjustments during the measurement period (ASC Topic 805) related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. [b] Amounts are presented as previously reported. [c] Represents the increase in management’s best estimate of fair value mainly driven by lower expected future credit losses on the acquired loan portfolio based on facts and circumstances existent as of the acquisition date but known to management during the measurement period. The main factors that influenced the revised estimated credit losses included review of collateral, revised appraised values, and review of borrower’s payment capacity in more thorough due diligence procedures. [d] This reduction is directly influenced by the reduction in estimated future credit losses as they are substantially covered by the FDIC under the 80% FDIC loss sharing agreements. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset decreased in a greater proportion than the reduction in the loan portfolio estimated future credit losses because of the true-up provision of the loss sharing agreement. As part of the agreement with the FDIC, the Corporation has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels as determined under the criteria stipulated in the agreements. The true-up payment represents an estimated liability of $169 million for the recasted estimates, compared with an estimated liability of $50 million in the original reported estimates. This estimated liability is accounted for as part of the indemnification asset. [e] Represents revisions to acquisition date estimated fair values of other real estate properties based on new appraisals obtained. [f] Represents an increase in the premium on the note issued to the FDIC, also influenced by the cash flow streams impacted by the revised loan payment estimates. [g] Reduction due to revised credit loss estimates and commitments. The impact in the results of operations for the period from May 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 as a result of the recasting was an increase in net income of $10.9 million. The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant assets acquired and liabilities FDIC-assisted transaction: the Westernbank assumed in type and accruing status. Principal considered characteristics such as loan type, payment term, and interest rate projections considered prepayment loss expectations. The discount rates were developed based on the relative risk of the cash flows, taking into account principally the loan type, market rates as of the valuation date, liquidity expectations, and the expected life of the loans. rates and credit Loans Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology. Certain loans were valued individually, while other loans were valued as pools. Aggregation into pools FDIC loss share indemnification asset Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses, including consideration of the true up payment and the 123 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT loss These sharing percentages. applicable expected reimbursements do not include reimbursable amounts related to future covered expenditures. The estimates of expected losses used in valuation of this asset are consistent with the loss estimates used in the valuation of the covered assets. These cash flows were discounted to reflect the estimated timing of the receipt of the loss share reimbursement from the FDIC and the value of any true-up payment due to the FDIC at the end of the loss sharing agreements, to the extent applicable. The discount rate used in this calculation was determined using a yield of an A-rated corporate security with a term based on the weighted average life of the recovery of cash flows plus a risk premium reflecting the uncertainty related to the timing of cash flows and the potential rejection of claims by the FDIC. Due to the increased uncertainty of the true-up payment, an additional risk premium was added to the discount rate. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation made $583 thousand in claims to the FDIC associated with losses incurred on covered loans or covered other real estate owned. Receivable from the FDIC The note issued to the FDIC as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date was determined based on a pro-forma statement of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of February 24, 2010, the bid transaction date. The receivable from the FDIC represents an adjustment to reconcile the consideration paid based on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 30, 2010 compared with the pro-forma statement as of February 24, 2010. The carrying amount of this receivable was a reasonable estimate of fair value based on its short-term nature. The receivable from the FDIC was collected by BPPR in June 2010 and is reflected as a cash inflow from financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010. The proceeds were remitted to the FDIC in July 2010 as a payment on the note. Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (“OREO”) OREO includes real estate acquired in settlement of loans. OREO properties were recorded at estimated fair values less costs to sell at the date acquired based on management’s assessments of existing appraisals or broker price opinions. The estimated costs to sell are based on past experience with similar property types and terms customary for real estate transactions. Goodwill The amount of goodwill is the residual difference in the fair value of liabilities assumed and net consideration paid to the FDIC over the fair value of the assets acquired. The goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction was assigned to the BPPR reportable segment. Core deposit intangible This intangible asset represents the value of the relationships that Westernbank had with its deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible asset was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of the core deposit base, interest costs, and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer deposits, and the cost of alternative funds. Deposits The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits that comprise the transaction accounts acquired, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values for time deposits were estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently offered to comparable time deposits with similar maturities. and non-credit Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments Unfunded loan commitments are contractual obligations to provide future funding. The fair value of a liability associated to unfunded loan commitments is principally based on the expected utilization rate or likelihood that the commitment will be exercised. The estimated value of the unfunded commitments was equal to the expected loss associated with the balance expected to be funded. The expected loss is comprised of both credit components; therefore, the discounts derived from the loan valuation were applied to the expected balance to be funded to derive the fair value. The unfunded loan commitments outstanding as of the 30, 2010 transaction date, which approximated April $218 million, and principally construction loans and commercial revolving lines of credit. Losses incurred on loan disbursements made under these unfunded loan commitments are covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreements provided that the Corporation complies such agreements. The with specific requirements under contingent is included as part of “other liabilities” in the consolidated statement of condition. liability on unfunded loan commitments commercial relate to Deferred taxes Deferred taxes relate to a difference between the financial statement and tax basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. Deferred taxes are reported based upon the principles in ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, and are measured using the enacted statutory income tax rate to be in effect for BPPR at the time the deferred tax is expected to reverse, which is 39%. For income tax purposes, the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction was accounted for as an asset purchase and the tax bases of assets acquired were allocated based on fair values using a modified residual method. Under this method, the purchase 124 price was allocated among the assets in order of liquidity (the most liquid first) up to its fair market value. Note issued to the FDIC The fair value of the note issued to the FDIC was determined using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for debt with similar terms, including consideration that the debt is collateralized by the assets covered under the loss sharing agreements. Cash flows collected from the covered assets, as well as payments from the FDIC on claimed credit losses associated to the covered assets, must be used to repay the note. Equity appreciation instrument As part of the consideration for the acquisition of Westernbank assets, BPPR also issued an equity appreciation instrument to the FDIC. Under the terms of the equity appreciation instrument, the FDIC has the opportunity to obtain a cash payment with a value equal to the product of (a) 50 million units and (b) the difference between (i) Popular, Inc.’s “average volume weighted price” over the two NASDAQ trading days immediately prior to the exercise date and (ii) the exercise price of $3.43. The equity appreciation instrument is exercisable by the holder thereof, in whole or in part, up to May 7, 2011. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as a liability and any subsequent changes in its estimated fair value will be recognized in earnings. The Corporation recognized non- ended interest December 31, 2010, as a result of a decrease in the fair value the equity appreciation instrument. These amounts are of separately of operations within the non-interest income category. income of $42.6 million for consolidated statement the year disclosed in the Note 4 - Sale of Processing and Technology Business: In 2010, the Corporation entered into a merger agreement, dated as of June 30, 2010, to sell a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including the merchant acquiring business of BPPR (the “EVERTEC transaction”), to funds managed by Apollo Management, L.P. (“Apollo”) in a leveraged buyout. In connection with the EVERTEC transaction, the Corporation completed an internal reorganization transferring certain intellectual property assets and interests in certain foreign subsidiaries to EVERTEC, including BPPR’s merchant acquiring business and TicketPop divisions. The Corporation retained EVERTEC’s operations in Venezuela and certain related contracts as an indirect wholly- owned subsidiary. The Corporation also retained equity interests in the processing businesses of Servicios Financieros, S.A. de C.V. (“Serfinsa”) and Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (“CONTADO”). On September 30, 2010, EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A. became a subsidiary of PIBI and EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA was transferred from Popular International Bank, Inc. (“PIBI”) to EVERTEC. On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the EVERTEC transaction. Following the consummation of the EVERTEC transaction, EVERTEC is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carib Holdings, Inc., a newly formed entity that is operated as a joint venture, with Apollo and the Corporation initially owning 51% and 49%, respectively, subject to pro rata dilution for certain issuances of capital stock to EVERTEC In connection with the leveraged buyout, management. EVERTEC issued financing in the form of unsecured senior notes and a participation in a syndicated loan (senior secured credit facility). The Corporation invested $35 million in senior unsecured notes issued by EVERTEC ($17.85 million, net of the elimination related to the 49% ownership interest maintained by Popular), which bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 11% and mature in October 2018. Also, the Corporation initially provided financing to EVERTEC by acquiring $58.2 million of the syndicated loan ($29.7 million, net of the elimination of the 49% equity interest). Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial at the December 31, 2010. outstanding statements balances for income As a result of the sale, the Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain, net of transaction costs, of approximately $616.2 million ($531.0 million after-tax), of which $640.8 million was separately disclosed within non-interest in the consolidated statement of operations and $24.6 million was included as operating expenses (transaction costs) for the year ended December 31, 2010. Approximately $94.0 million of the pre-tax gain was the result of marking the Corporation’s retained interest in the EVERTEC business at fair value. This portion of the gain was non-cash. The equity value of the Corporation’s retained interest in the former subsidiary takes into consideration the buyer’s enterprise value of EVERTEC reduced by the debt incurred, net of debt issue costs, utilized as part of the sale transaction. This debt significantly impacts the resulting fair value of the retained interest. to which, among other various processing As part of the EVERTEC transaction, on September 30, 2010, the Corporation entered into certain ancillary agreements things, EVERTEC will pursuant provide and information technology services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries and gave BPPR access to the ATH network owned and operated by EVERTEC by providing various services, in each case for initial terms of fifteen years. These service costs will be included prospectively in operating consolidated statements of operations, net of elimination entries that are required since the Corporation holds the 49% equity interest in EVERTEC. the Corporation’s expenses on investment the in EVERTEC, which is The Corporation’s accounted for under amounted to $197 million at December 31, 2010, and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statement of condition. The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the equity method, 125 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT of operations statements commencing consolidated on October 1, 2010. The Corporation recognized a $14.9 million loss in other operating income for the period from October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 as part of its equity method investment in EVERTEC, which consisted of $574 thousand of the Corporation’s share in EVERTEC’s net income, partially offset by $15.4 million of intercompany income eliminations (investor- investee transactions at 49%). The unfavorable impact of the elimination in other operating income was offset by the elimination of 49% of the professional fees (expense) paid by the Corporation to EVERTEC during the same period. The Corporation did not receive any distributions from EVERTEC during the period from October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for a list of related party transactions between the Corporation and EVERTEC, as an affiliate. The equity investments in the processing businesses of Serfinsa and CONTADO continued to be held by the Corporation at December 31, 2010. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Corporation is required for a period of twelve months following the merger to continue to seek to sell its equity interests in such entities to EVERTEC, subject to complying with certain rights of first refusal in favor of the Serfinsa and CONTADO shareholders. The Corporation’s investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa, accounted for under the equity method, amounted to $16 million and $1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $15 million and the Corporation $1 million, recognized $2.8 million as part of equity method investment in CONTADO and Serfinsa (2009 - $1.8 million). respectively). During 2010, its Note 5 - Discontinued operations: In 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (“PFH”) by selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The following table provides financial information for the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. (In millions) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest loss, including fair value adjustments on loans and mortgage servicing rights Operating expenses, including restructuring costs and reductions in value of servicing advances and other real estate [a] Loss on disposition during the period [b] Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations Income tax expense [c] Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax 2009 2008 $ 0.9 – $ 30.8 19.0 (3.2) (266.9) 10.9 – (13.2) 6.8 213.5 (79.9) (548.5) 14.9 ($20.0) ($563.4) [a] Restructuring costs amounted to $17.4 million in 2008, which consisted principally of personnel costs of $8.9 million and net occupancy expenses of $6.7 million. [b] Loss on disposition for 2008 includes the loss associated to the sale of manufactured housing loans in September 2008, including lower of cost or market adjustments at reclassification from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Also, it includes the impact of fair value adjustments and other losses incurred during the fourth quarter of 2008 related to the sale of loans, residual interests and servicing related assets. [c] Income tax for 2008 included the impact of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $209.0 million. Note 6 - Restrictions on cash and due from banks and highly liquid securities: Restricted assets include cash and other highly liquid securities for which the Corporation’s ability to withdraw funds at any time is contractually limited. Restricted assets are generally designated for specific purposes arising out of certain contractual or other obligations. The Corporation’s subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or other banks. Those balances were approximately $835 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $721 million). Cash and due from banks, as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances. required average reserve As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center the Corporation Law, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, maintained separately for its two international banking entities (“IBEs”), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally split for the two IBEs, which were considered restricted assets. At December 31, 2009, as part of a line of credit facility with a institution, the Corporation was required to have financial restricted cash of $2 million as collateral for the line of credit. This restriction expired in July 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $5 million to support a letter of credit (2009 - $4 million). The cash is being held in an interest-bearing money market account. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $1 million that represents funds deposited in an escrow account which are guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the title and insured properties. At December 31, 2010, the corporation maintained restricted cash of $12 million to comply with the requirements of the credit card networks. Note 7 - Securities purchased under agreements to resell: The securities purchased underlying the agreements to resell the Corporation. The were delivered to, and are held by, counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities. The Corporation is permitted by contract to repledge the securities, and has agreed to resell to the counterparties the same or substantially similar securities at the maturity of the agreements. 126 The fair value of the collateral securities held by the Corporation on these transactions at December 31, was as follows: The repledged securities were used as underlying securities for repurchase agreement transactions. (In thousands) Repledged Not repledged Total 2010 2009 $171,833 11,495 $183,328 $167,602 155,072 $322,674 Note 8 - Investment securities available-for-sale: The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (2008 — only fair value is presented). (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years Total U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Mortgage - backed securities Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total mortgage - backed securities Equity securities (without contractual maturity) Other After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total other Total investment securities available-for-sale 2010 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Weighted Average Yield $7,001 28,676 35,677 153,738 1,000,955 1,512 1,156,205 10,404 15,853 20,765 5,505 52,527 77 1,846 107,186 1,096,271 1,205,380 10,208 79,311 89,519 2,983 15,738 170,662 2,289,210 2,478,593 8,722 $122 2,337 2,459 2,043 53,681 36 55,760 19 279 43 52 393 1 105 1,507 32,248 33,861 – – – – $661 – 661 – 5 194 19 218 – – 936 11 947 31 78 109 158 4,532 4,690 101 649 10,580 86,870 98,200 855 – 3 3 632 638 102 $7,123 31,013 38,136 1.50% 3.81 3.36 155,781 1,053,975 1,548 1,211,304 10,423 16,127 20,614 5,538 52,702 78 1,951 107,757 1,128,508 1,238,294 10,081 74,857 84,938 3,084 16,384 181,239 2,375,448 2,576,155 9,475 3.39 3.72 6.30 3.68 3.92 4.52 5.07 5.28 4.70 3.88 4.77 2.50 2.87 2.84 1.20 2.29 2.17 3.62 3.98 4.71 4.26 4.29 3.43 17,850 7,805 25,655 262 – 262 $5,052,278 $191,899 – 69 69 $7,325 18,112 7,736 25,848 $5,236,852 10.98 3.62 8.74 3.78% 127 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT (Dollars in thousands) U.S. Treasury securities After 5 to 10 years Total U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Within 1 year After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Mortgage - backed securities Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total mortgage - backed securities Equity securities (without contractual maturity) 2009 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Weighted Average Yield 2008 Fair Value $29,359 29,359 349,424 1,177,318 27,812 26,884 1,581,438 – 22,311 50,910 7,840 81,061 41 4,875 125,397 1,454,833 1,585,146 – 20,885 105,669 126,554 26,878 30,117 205,480 2,915,689 3,178,164 8,902 $1,093 1,093 7,491 58,151 680 176 66,498 – 7 249 – 256 – 120 2,105 19,060 21,285 – – 109 109 512 823 8,781 32,102 42,218 233 – – – – – – – – $15 632 61 708 – – 404 5,837 6,241 – 653 8,452 9,105 – – – 10,203 10,203 1,345 $30,452 3.80% $502,118 30,452 3.80 502,118 356,915 1,235,469 28,492 27,060 1,647,936 – 22,303 50,527 7,779 3.67 3.79 4.96 5.68 3.82 – 6.92 5.08 5.26 126,170 4,623,959 28,908 27,971 4,807,008 4,566 2,257 64,938 29,229 80,609 5.60 100,990 41 4,995 127,098 1,468,056 1,600,190 – 20,232 97,326 117,558 27,390 30,940 214,261 2,937,588 3,210,179 7,790 3.78 4.44 2.85 3.03 3.02 – 2.00 2.59 2.50 3.61 3.94 4.80 4.40 4.42 3.65 179 6,877 156,030 1,343,882 1,506,968 440 28,005 120,303 148,748 18,711 67,657 119,289 642,848 848,505 10,150 Total investment securities available-for-sale $6,590,624 $131,692 $27,602 $6,694,714 3.91% $7,924,487 The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value. Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer. The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and at available-for-sale fair investment December 31, 2010, by contractual maturity. value of securities (In thousands) Amortized Cost Fair Value Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total Equity Securities Total investment securities available-for-sale $167,202 1,041,393 356,859 3,478,102 5,043,556 8,722 $169,366 1,095,560 370,364 3,592,087 5,227,377 9,475 $5,052,278 $5,236,852 Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale during 2010 were $397.1 million (2009 - $3.8 billion; 2008 - $2.4 billion). Gross realized gains on securities available-for-sale during 2010 were $3.8 million (gross realized gains and losses during 2009 - $184.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively; 2008 - $29.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively). The following table shows the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2010 and 2009. 128 (In thousands) Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized -backed securities - private label Mortgage backed securities Equity securities Other Total investment securities available-for-sale in an At December 31, 2010 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses $24,284 $661 – – $24,284 $661 19,357 40,212 21,231 33,261 3 7,736 213 945 292 406 8 69 $303 2,505 52,302 9,257 43 – $5 2 4,398 232 94 – 19,660 42,717 73,533 42,518 46 7,736 218 947 4,690 638 102 69 unrealized loss position $146,084 $2,594 $64,410 $4,731 $210,494 $7,325 (In thousands) Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized -backed securities - private label Mortgage-backed securities Equity securities Total investment securities available-for-sale in an At December 31, 2009 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value $2,387 298,917 6,716 905,028 2,347 Gross Unrealized Losses $8 3,667 18 10,130 981 Fair Value $63,429 359,214 97,904 3,566 3,898 Gross Unrealized Losses $700 2,574 9,087 73 364 Fair Value $65,816 658,131 104,620 908,594 6,245 Gross Unrealized Losses $708 6,241 9,105 10,203 1,345 unrealized loss position $1,215,395 $14,804 $528,011 $12,798 $1,743,406 $27,602 evaluates securities investment Management for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the excess of the security’s carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7) management’s intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted recovery occurs. At December 31, 2010, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also, management evaluated the Corporation’s portfolio of equity securities at December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded $264 thousand (2009 - $10.9 million) in losses on certain equity securities considered other-than-temporary impairment. Management has 129 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT the intent and ability to hold the investments in equity securities that are at a loss position at December 31, 2010 for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments. for ratings The unrealized losses associated with “Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label” are primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to the private-label CMOs, verifying the credit management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan collateral for these bonds. Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO, including among others, the weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and foreclosure rates of the underlying assets in the securities. At December 31, 2010, there were no “sub-prime” securities in the Corporation’s private-label CMOs portfolios. For private-label CMOs with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010, credit that impairment was assessed using a cash flow model estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and then projects the expected cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates. Management’s assessment also considered tests using more stressful parameters. Based on the assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by the Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2010, thus management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities. The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities), securities equity. This exceeds information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer. stockholders’ 10% of 2010 2009 Amortized Cost $757,812 1,003,395 637,644 Fair Value $789,838 1,056,549 654,495 Amortized Cost $970,744 1,385,535 959,316 Fair Value $991,825 1,449,454 971,556 (In thousands) FNMA FHLB Freddie Mac 130 Note 9 - Investment securities held-to-maturity: The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (2008 - only amortized cost is presented). (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities Within 1 year Total U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Other Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years Total other Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains 2010 Gross Unrealized Losses $25,873 25,873 2,150 15,529 17,594 56,702 91,975 176 176 4,080 250 4,330 – – $6 333 115 – 454 – – – – – $1 1 – – 268 1,649 1,917 10 10 – 7 7 Fair Value Weighted Average Yield $25,872 25,872 0.11% 0.11 2,156 15,862 17,441 55,053 90,512 166 166 4,080 243 4,323 5.33 4.10 5.96 4.25 4.58 5.45 5.45 1.15 1.20 1.15 Total investment securities held-to-maturity $122,354 $454 $1,935 $120,873 3.51% (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities Within 1 year Total U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains 2009 Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Weighted Average Yield 2008 Amortized Cost $25,777 25,777 7,015 109,415 17,112 48,600 $4 4 6 3,157 39 – – – $25,781 25,781 0.11% 0.11 $1,499 1,499 – $6 452 2,552 7,021 112,566 16,699 46,048 2.04 5.51 5.79 4.00 106,910 108,860 16,170 52,730 Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions 182,142 3,202 3,010 182,334 5.00 284,670 Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label After 10 years Total collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Other Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years Total other 220 220 3,573 1,250 4,823 – – – – – 12 12 – – – 208 208 3,573 1,250 4,823 5.45 5.45 3.77 1.66 1.36 244 244 6,584 1,750 8,334 Total investment securities held-to-maturity $212,962 $3,206 $3,022 $213,146 4.37% $294,747 131 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer. The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2010, by contractual maturity. (In thousands) Within 1 year After 1 to 5 years After 5 to 10 years After 10 years Total investment securities held-to-maturity Amortized Cost Fair Value $32,103 15,779 17,594 56,878 $32,108 16,105 17,441 55,219 $122,354 $120,873 The following table shows the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2010 and 2009: (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Other Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss At December 31, 2010 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value $25,872 51,995 – 243 Gross Unrealized Losses $1 1,915 – 7 Fair Value – $773 166 – Gross Unrealized Losses – $2 10 – Fair Value $25,872 52,768 166 243 Gross Unrealized Losses $1 1,917 10 7 position $78,110 $1,923 $939 $12 $79,049 $1,935 (In thousands) Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized At December 31, 2009 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total Fair Value $21,187 – Gross Unrealized Losses $1,908 – Fair Value $37,718 208 Gross Unrealized Losses $1,102 12 Fair Value $58,905 208 Gross Unrealized Losses $3,010 12 loss position $21,187 $1,908 $37,926 $1,114 $59,113 $3,022 As indicated in Note 8 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. The “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions” classified as held-to-maturity at December 31, 2010 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value at December 31, 2010 was attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, thus no other-than-temporary decline in value was necessary to be recorded in these held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. 132 Note 10 - Loans and allowance for loan losses: The following table presents the composition of loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Lease financing Consumer: Credit cards Home equity lines of credit Personal Auto Other Total loans held-in-portfolio[a] Non-covered loans at December 31, 2010 Covered loans at December 31, 2010 Total loans HIP at December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 $7,006,676 4,386,809 500,851 4,524,748 705,776 1,132,308 503,761 1,236,068 568,360 268,919 $20,834,276 $2,340,923 431,064 635,892 1,259,253 – – – – – 169,750 $4,836,882 $9,347,599 4,817,873 1,136,743 5,784,001 705,776 1,132,308 503,761 1,236,068 568,360 438,669 $25,671,158 $7,983,486 4,680,573 1,724,373 4,603,357 785,659 1,136,041 694,558 1,008,911 1,039,358 170,947 $23,827,263 [a] Loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 exclude $106 million in unearned income and $894 million in loans held-for-sale (2009 - $114 million and $91 million, respectively). Loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows: (In thousands) Commercial Construction Mortgage Total December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 $60,528 412,744 420,666 $893,938 $2,897 – 87,899 $90,796 The following table presents loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more by loan class at December 31, 2010. (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer: Credit cards Home equity lines of credit Personal Auto Other Total [a] Puerto Rico USA Popular, Inc. Non- accrual loans $384,849 125,427 65,846 518,446 5,674 – – 22,816 7,528 6,892 $1,137,478 Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more Non- accrual loans Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more – $60 – 301,035 – 33,514 – – – 3,750 $338,359 $182,456 57,102 173,876 23,587 263 – 17,562 5,369 135 – $460,350 – – – – – – – – – – – Non- accrual loans $567,305 182,529 239,722 542,033 5,937 – 17,562 28,185 7,663 6,892 $1,597,828 Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more – $60 – 301,035 – 33,514 – – – 3,750 $338,359 [a] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $672 million in loans held-for-sale. Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses. Non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 of $26 million and $13 million of accruing loans past-due 90 days or more are included in the table above. At December 31, 2010, loans on which the accrual of interest income had been discontinued amounted to $1.6 billion (2009 - $2.3 billion; 2008 - $1.2 billion). If these loans had been accruing interest, the additional interest income realized would have been approximately $75.7 million (2009 - $60.0 million; 2008 - $48.7 million). Non-accruing loans at December 31, 2010 include $60 million (2009 - $64 million; 2008 - $68 million) in consumer loans. 133 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following tables present loans by past due status at December 31, 2010 for loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income) including covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30. (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer: Credit cards Personal Auto Other Sub-total Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 Total Puerto Rico (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer: Credit cards Home equity lines of credit Personal Auto Total USA Puerto Rico Past Due 30-59 Days $47,064 34,703 6,356 188,468 10,737 60-89 Days $25,547 23,695 3,000 83,789 2,274 16,073 21,004 22,076 3,799 $350,280 12,758 11,830 5,301 1,318 $169,512 90 Days or More $370,677 114,792 64,678 810,833 5,674 33,514 22,816 7,528 8,334 $1,438,846 Total Past Due $443,288 173,190 74,034 1,083,090 18,685 Current $3,412,310 2,688,228 94,322 2,566,610 554,102 Loans held- in-portfolio Puerto Rico $3,855,598 2,861,418 168,356 3,649,700 572,787 62,345 55,650 34,905 13,451 $1,958,638 1,054,081 965,610 459,745 252,048 $12,047,056 1,116,426 1,021,260 494,650 265,499 $14,005,694 $2,224 $8,294 $36,991 $47,509 $249,445 $296,954 231,451 $583,955 137,886 $315,692 916,293 $2,392,130 1,285,630 $3,291,777 3,254,298 $15,550,799 4,539,928 $18,842,576 USA 60-89 Days $10,322 15,079 292 12,751 224 357 6,873 2,689 98 $48,685 30-59 Days $68,903 30,372 30,105 38,550 1,008 343 6,116 5,559 375 $181,331 Past Due 90 Days or More $182,456 57,102 173,876 23,587 263 – 17,562 5,369 135 $460,350 Total Past Due $261,681 102,553 204,273 74,888 1,495 700 30,551 13,617 608 $690,366 Current $2,889,397 1,422,838 128,222 800,134 28,711 15,182 537,802 201,190 8,499 $6,031,975 Loans held- in-portfolio USA $3,151,078 1,525,391 332,495 875,022 30,206 15,882 568,353 214,807 9,107 $6,722,341 134 Popular, Inc. Past Due 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days or More Total Past Due $115,967 65,075 36,461 227,018 11,745 16,416 6,116 26,563 22,451 3,799 $35,869 38,774 3,292 96,540 2,498 13,115 6,873 14,519 5,399 1,318 $553,133 171,894 238,554 834,420 5,937 33,514 17,562 28,185 7,663 8,334 $704,969 275,743 278,307 1,157,978 20,180 63,045 30,551 69,267 35,513 13,451 Loans held- in-portfolio Popular, Inc $7,006,676 4,386,809 500,851 4,524,722 602,993 1,132,308 568,353 1,236,067 503,757 265,499 Current $6,301,707 4,111,066 222,544 3,366,744 582,813 1,069,263 537,802 1,166,800 468,244 252,048 $531,611 $218,197 $1,899,196 $2,649,004 $18,079,031 $20,728,035 $2,224 $8,294 $36,991 $47,509 $249,445 $296,954 231,451 $765,286 137,886 916,293 1,285,630 3,254,298 4,539,928 $364,377 $2,852,480 $3,982,143 $21,582,774 $25,564,917 (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Credit cards Home equity lines of credit Personal Auto Other Sub-total Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 Total Popular, Inc. Loans that were considered impaired based on ASC Section 310-10-35 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related disclosures, are as follows: (In thousands) Impaired loans with related allowance Impaired loans that do not require an allowance Total impaired loans Allowance for impaired loans Average balance of impaired loans during the year Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the year 2010 2009 $154,349 644,150 $1,263,298 410,323 $798,499 $1,673,621 $13,770 $323,887 $1,539,163 $1,339,438 $21,847 $16,939 The following tables present commercial, construction, and mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2010. Impaired Loans – With an Allowance Impaired Loans – With No Allowance Impaired Loans - Total Puerto Rico (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Recorded Investment $11,403 23,699 4,514 114,733 Unpaid Principal Balance $13,613 28,307 10,515 115,595 Related Allowance Recorded Investment $3,590 4,960 216 5,004 $208,891 66,589 61,184 6,476 $343,140 Unpaid Principal Balance $256,858 79,917 99,016 6,476 $442,267 Recorded Investment $220,294 90,288 65,698 121,209 $497,489 Unpaid Principal Balance $270,471 108,224 109,531 122,071 $610,297 Related Allowance $3,590 4,960 216 5,004 $13,770 Total Puerto Rico $154,349 $168,030 $13,770 135 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Impaired Loans – With an Allowance USA Impaired Loans – With No Allowance Impaired Loans – Total (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Total USA Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related Allowance Recorded Investment – – – – – – – – – – – – $101,856 33,530 165,624 $301,010 Unpaid Principal Balance $152,876 44,443 248,955 $446,274 Recorded Investment $101,856 33,530 165,624 $301,010 Unpaid Principal Balance $152,876 44,443 248,955 $446,274 Related Allowance – – – – There were no mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment in the USA portfolio at December 31, 2010. Impaired Loans – With an Allowance Popular, Inc. Impaired Loans – With No Allowance (In thousands) Recorded Investment Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage $11,403 23,699 4,514 114,733 Unpaid Principal Balance $13,613 28,307 10,515 115,595 Related Allowance Recorded Investment $3,590 4,960 216 5,004 $310,747 100,119 226,808 6,476 Unpaid Principal Balance $409,734 124,360 347,971 6,476 Total Popular, Inc. $154,349 $168,030 $13,770 $644,150 $888,541 Impaired Loans – Total Recorded Investment $322,150 123,818 231,322 121,209 $798,499 Unpaid Principal Balance $423,347 152,667 358,486 122,071 Related Allowance $3,590 4,960 216 5,004 $1,056,571 $13,770 The following table presents the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2010. (In thousands) Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Total Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico USA Popular, Inc. Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized $255,283 158,376 507,166 78,496 $999,321 $5,753 2,601 1,626 3,739 $13,719 $130,437 55,895 195,358 158,152 $539,842 $1,261 189 1,000 5,678 $8,128 $385,720 214,271 702,524 236,648 $7,014 2,790 2,626 9,417 $1,539,163 $21,847 Troubled debt restructurings amounted to $427 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $601 million), which included commercial, construction, and mortgage loans which had been renegotiated at below-market interest rates or which other amount of outstanding concessions were granted. The commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted to $3 million related to the construction loan portfolio and $1 million related to the commercial loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $60 million and $1 million, respectively). The Corporation has defined a dual risk rating system to assign a rating to all credit exposures, particularly for the commercial and construction loan portfolios. Risk ratings in the aggregate provide the Corporation’s management the asset quality profile for the loan portfolio. The dual risk rating system provides for the assignment of ratings at the obligor level based on the financial condition of the borrower, and at the credit facility level based on the collateral supporting the transaction. The Corporation’s obligor risk rating scales range from rating 1 (Excellent) to rating 14 (Loss). The obligor risk rating reflects the risk of payment default of a borrower in the ordinary course of business. The risk ratings from 10 through 14 conform to regulatory ratings of Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss, defined as follows: Special Mention - Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential the in deterioration of weaknesses may result repayment prospects the loan or of Corporation’s credit position at some future date. the for Substandard - Loans classified as substandard are deemed to be inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as such have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. inherent Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses as in substandard, with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make the collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. classified those Loss - Uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. The Corporation has defined as adversely classified loans all credit facilities with obligor risk ratings of Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. The assignment of the obligor risk rating is based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debts such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation periodically reviews loans classified as watch list or worse, to evaluate if they are properly classified, and to determine impairment, if any. The frequency of these reviews will depend on the amount of the aggregate outstanding debt, and the risk rating classification of the obligor. In addition, during the renewal process of applicable credit facilities, the Corporation evaluates the corresponding loan grades. Loans classified as pass credits are excluded from the scope of the review process described above until: (a) they become past due; (b) management becomes aware of deterioration in the credit worthiness of the borrower; or (c) the customer contacts the Corporation for a modification. In these circumstances, the credit 136 facilities are specifically evaluated to assign the appropriate risk rating classification. (In thousands) Puerto Rico Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total Puerto Rico United States Commercial real estate Commercial and industrial Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total United States Total Adversely Classified Total Portfolio $623,325 355,562 83,115 550,933 11,508 52,133 $3,855,598 2,861,418 168,356 3,649,700 572,787 2,897,835 $1,676,576 $14,005,694 $633,470 250,843 274,300 23,587 – 23,065 $3,151,078 1,525,391 332,495 875,022 30,206 808,149 $1,205,265 $6,722,341 $2,881,841 $20,728,035 on pools based aggregated Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were similar into characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income using the effective yield method over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses related to the covered loans at December 31, 2010. 137 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT In addition, the Corporation also provides an inherent unallocated portion of the allowance that is intended to recognize probable losses that are not otherwise identifiable and includes management’s subjective determination of amounts necessary to provide for the possible use of imprecise estimates in determining the allocated portion of the allowance. The following table presents the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. (In thousands) Balance at beginning of year Provision for loan losses Recoveries Charge-offs Write-downs related to loans transferred to loans held-for-sale Change in allowance for loan losses from discontinued operations [a] Balance at end of year 2010 $1,261,204 1,011,880 96,704 (1,249,356) (327,207) – 2009 $882,807 1,405,807 68,537 (1,095,947) – – 2008 $548,832 991,384 45,540 (645,504) (12,430) (45,015) $793,225 $1,261,204 $882,807 [a] A positive amount represents higher provision for loans losses recorded during the period compared to net charge-offs, and vice versa for a negative amount. The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the loan balance by portfolio segments at December 31, 2010. (In thousands) Allowance for credit losses: Beginning balance Charge-offs Recoveries Write-downs Provision Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Ending balance: covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 Loans held-in-portfolio: Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Ending balance: Covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 Commercial Secured Commercial Unsecured Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total Puerto Rico $150,390 (178,406) 10,101 (38,137) 230,838 $174,786 $81,454 (73,439) 10,611 – 63,231 $81,857 $214,998 (290,065) 915 (91,686) 181,912 $24,911 (22,579) 867 – 38,830 $12,204 (10,517) 4,058 – 1,409 $171,901 (162,516) 30,733 – 93,413 $655,858 (737,522) 57,285 (129,823) 609,633 $16,074 $42,029 $7,154 $133,531 $455,431 $6,681 $1,869 $216 $5,004 – – $13,770 $168,105 $79,988 $15,858 $37,025 $7,154 $133,531 $441,661 – – – – – – – $7,406,025 $2,082,978 $804,248 $4,908,953 $572,787 $3,067,585 $18,842,576 $308,750 $1,832 $65,698 $121,209 – – $497,489 $4,756,352 $1,650,082 $102,658 $3,528,491 $572,787 $2,897,835 $13,508,205 $2,340,923 $431,064 $635,892 $1,259,253 – $169,750 $4,836,882 138 (In thousands) Allowance for credit losses: Beginning balance Charge-offs Recoveries Write-down Provision Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Loans held-in-portfolio: Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Commercial Secured Commercial Unsecured Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total United States $203,210 (189,660) 16,944 – 170,750 $201,244 $9,011 (34,994) 547 – 29,940 $4,504 $126,321 (115,353) 9,516 – 11,166 $129,700 (77,256) 4,189 (197,384) 169,590 – ($4,860) 892 – 9,967 $137,104 (89,711) 7,331 – 10,834 $605,346 (511,834) 39,419 (197,384) 402,247 $31,650 $28,839 $5,999 $65,558 $337,794 – – – – – – – $201,244 $4,504 $31,650 $28,839 $5,999 $65,558 $337,794 $4,661,735 $14,734 $332,495 $875,022 $30,206 $808,149 $6,722,341 $135,386 – $165,624 – – – $301,010 $4,526,349 $14,734 $166,871 $875,022 $30,206 $808,149 $6,421,331 139 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT (In thousands) Allowance for credit losses: Beginning balance Charge-offs Recoveries Write-downs Provision Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Ending balance: covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 Loans held-in-portfolio: Ending balance Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment Ending balance: Covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 Commercial Secured Commercial Unsecured Construction Mortgage Leasing Consumer Total Popular, Inc. $353,600 (368,066) 27,045 (38,137) 401,588 $376,030 $90,465 (108,433) 11,158 – 93,171 $86,361 $341,319 (405,418) 10,431 (91,686) 193,078 $47,724 $154,611 (99,835) 5,056 (197,384) 208,420 $12,204 (15,377) 4,950 – 11,376 $309,005 (252,227) 38,064 – 104,247 $1,261,204 (1,249,356) 96,704 (327,207) 1,011,880 $70,868 $13,153 $199,089 $793,225 $6,681 $1,869 $216 $5,004 – – $13,770 $369,349 $84,492 $47,508 $65,864 $13,153 $199,089 $779,455 – – – – – – – $12,067,760 $2,097,712 $1,136,743 $5,783,975 $602,993 $3,875,734 $25,564,917 $444,136 $1,832 $231,322 $121,209 – – $798,499 $9,282,701 $1,664,816 $269,529 $4,403,513 $602,993 $3,705,984 $19,929,536 $2,340,923 $431,064 $635,892 $1,259,253 – $169,750 $4,836,882 The components of the net financing leases receivable at December 31, were: (In thousands) Total minimum lease payments Estimated residual value of leased property Deferred origination costs, net of fees Less - Unearned financing income Net minimum lease payments Less - Allowance for loan losses At December 31, 2010, future minimum lease payments are expected to be received as follows: (In thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 and thereafter $173,439 140,352 107,759 75,496 53,954 $551,000 2010 2009 $551,000 $613,347 (In thousands) 147,667 7,109 102,783 602,993 13,153 165,097 7,216 110,031 675,629 18,558 $589,840 $657,071 The following table presents acquired loans accounted for the April 30, 2010 to ASC Subtopic 310-30 at pursuant acquisition date: Contractually-required principal and interest Non-accretable difference Cash flows expected to be collected Accretable yield Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 $9,850,613 3,402,907 6,447,706 1,538,059 $4,909,647 The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC- assisted transaction that are accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $8.1 billion at the April 30, 2010 transaction date. Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at and for the year ended December 31, 2010, and which are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows: Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $450 million at the April 30, 2010 transaction date. 140 (In thousands) Balance as January 1, 2010 Additions [1] Accretion Payments received Accretable yield – $1,538,059 (206,951) Carrying amount of loans – $4,909,647 206,951 (576,670) Balance at December 31, 2010 $1,331,108 $4,539,928 [1] Represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of acquisition. There were no reclassifications from non-accretable difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, none of the acquired loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing interest income, through accretion of the loans. Therefore, difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans. As indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loan is accruing the loan, interest. The following table presents acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date: if (In thousands) Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected $290,810 $457,201 $164,427 The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC- to ASC assisted transaction that are accounted pursuant There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses related to the covered loans at December 31, 2010. such, under Note 11 - Transfers of financial assets and servicing assets: The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential in conjunction with GNMA and FNMA mortgage loans securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the corresponding agency and, as seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the agencies’ servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially, all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements. loan sales During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation retained servicing rights on guaranteed mortgage securitizations involving and whole (FNMA and GNMA) approximately $904 million in principal balance outstanding (December 31, 2009 - $1.4 billion). During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized net gains of transactions approximately (December 31, 2009 - $24.6 million). All loan sales or securitizations performed during the year ended December 31, 2010 were without credit recourse agreements. $18.6 million these on During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $832 million of assets as result of securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $817 million in mortgage-backed securities and $15 million in servicing rights. No liabilities were incurred as a result of these transfers during the year ended December 31, 2010 because they did not contain any credit recourse arrangements. The Corporation recorded a net gain $15.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to these residential mortgage loans securitized. 141 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table presents the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from residential mortgage loans securitized during the year ended December 31, 2010. (In thousands) Assets Investments securities available for sale: Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA Total investment securities available-for-sale Trading account securities: Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA Total trading account securities Mortgage servicing rights Total The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations. Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are measured at fair value. Fair value determination is performed on a subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with the types of assets or markets served. incorporates assumptions The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior. among other and late fees, The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Residential MSRs (In thousands) Fair value at beginning of year Purchases Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers Changes due to payments on loans [1] Changes in fair value due to changes in 2010 2009 $169,747 4,693 $176,034 1,364 15,326 (16,896) 23,795 (13,293) valuation model inputs or assumptions (5,963) (18,153) Fair value at end of year $166,907 $169,747 [1] Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. Proceeds Obtained During The Year Ended December 31, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Initial Fair Value – – – – – – – – $6,554 – $6,554 $635,575 171,252 $806,827 – $813,381 – – – $4,147 – $4,147 $14,691 $18,838 $6,554 – $6,554 $639,722 171,252 $810,974 $14,691 $832,219 Residential mortgage loans $18.4 billion at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $17.7 billion). serviced for others were Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value adjustments, for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $47.7 million (2009 - $46.5 million; 2008 - $31.8 million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. At December 31, 2010, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.27% (2009 - 0.26%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced. The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs, originated and purchased. Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the residential mortgage loan securitizations the banking subsidiaries during the years ended December 31, were as follows: loan sales by and whole Prepayment speed Weighted average life Discount rate (annual rate) 2010 2009 5.9% 17.1 years 11.4% 7.8% 12.8 years 11.0% Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows: Originated MSRs 142 (In thousands) Fair value of retained interests Weighted average life Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change December 31, 2010 2009 $101,675 12.5 years $97,870 8.8 years 8.0% 11.4% ($3,413) ($6,651) ($3,182) ($7,173) 12.8% 12.4% ($4,479) ($8,605) ($2,715) ($6,240) The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows: Purchased MSRs (In thousands) Fair value of retained interests Weighted average life Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change December 31, 2010 2009 $65,232 12.7 years $71,877 9.9 years 7.9% 10.1% ($1,963) ($3,956) ($2,697) ($5,406) 11.5% 11.1% ($2,353) ($4,671) ($2,331) ($4,681) The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.0 billion (2009 - $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation. Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase, at its option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual loans meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had recorded $168 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this buy-back option program (2009 - $124 million). The Corporation has also identified the rights to service a portfolio of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) commercial loans as another class of servicing rights. The SBA servicing rights are measured at the lower of cost or fair value method. The following table 143 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT presents the activity in the SBA servicing rights for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. During 2010 and 2009, the Corporation did not execute any sale of SBA loans. (In thousands) Balance at beginning of year Rights originated Rights purchased Amortization Balance at end of year Less: Valuation allowance Balance at end of year, net of valuation allowance Fair value at end of year 2010 2009 $2,758 – – (1,061) $1,697 – $1,697 $4,274 $4,272 – – (1,514) $2,758 – $2,758 $6,081 SBA loans serviced for others were $531 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $544 million). In 2010 and 2009, weighted average servicing fees on the SBA serviced loans were approximately 1.04%. Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of SBA loans and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows: SBA Loans (In thousands) Carrying amount of retained interests Fair value of retained interests Weighted average life Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change December 31, 2010 2009 $1,697 $4,274 3.2 years $2,758 $6,081 3.4 years 8.0% ($86) ($178) 13.0% ($130) ($265) 8.0% ($128) ($264) 13.0% ($193) ($393) Quantitative information about delinquencies, net credit losses, and components of securitized financial assets and other assets managed together with them by the Corporation, including its own loan portfolio, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, are disclosed in the following tables. Loans securitized/sold represent loans which the Corporation has continuing involvement in the form of credit recourse. (In thousands) Loans (owned and managed): Commercial and construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Covered loans Less: Loans securitized / sold Loans held-for-sale Loans held-in-portfolio 2010 Total principal amount of loans, net of unearned Principal amount 60 days or more past due Net credit losses $12,367,608 602,993 8,927,303 3,705,984 4,836,882 (3,981,915) (893,938) $25,564,917 $1,514,604 8,435 1,554,033 136,483 183,799 (423,345) – $2,974,009 $963,106 10,427 293,582 214,163 – (1,419) (327,207) $1,152,652 144 2009 Total principal amount of loans, net of unearned Principal amount 60 days or more past due Net credit losses $14,391,328 675,629 9,133,494 4,045,807 (4,442,349) (90,796) $23,713,113 $1,861,569 12,416 1,233,717 149,535 (401,257) – $2,855,980 $573,191 17,482 121,564 316,131 (958) – $1,027,410 (In thousands) Loans (owned and managed): Commercial and construction Lease financing Mortgage Consumer Less: Loans securitized / sold Loans held-for-sale Loans held-in-portfolio Note 12 – Premises and equipment: Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization as follows: Note 13 – Other assets: The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following major categories: (In thousands) Land Buildings Equipment Leasehold improvements Less – Accumulated depreciation and amortization Subtotal Construction in progress Total premises and equipment, net Useful life in years 7-50 3-10 3-10 2010 $103,632 494,512 324,106 86,117 904,735 2009 $97,260 440,107 474,606 95,481 1,010,194 467,706 437,029 4,792 578,143 432,051 55,542 $545,453 $584,853 Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the year 2010 was $58.9 million (2009 – $64.4 million; 2008 – $72.4 million), of which $24.4 million (2009 – $24.1 million; 2008 - $26.2 million) was charged to occupancy expense and $34.5 million (2009 – $40.3 million; 2008 - $46.2 million) was charged to equipment, communications and other operating expenses. Occupancy expense is net of rental income of $27.1 million (2009 – $26.6 million; 2008 – $32.1 million). (In thousands) Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance) Investments under the equity method Bank-owned life insurance program Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment Other prepaid expenses Derivative assets Trade receivables from brokers and counterparties Others Total other assets 2010 2009 $388,466 299,185 237,997 147,513 75,149 72,510 $363,967 99,772 232,387 206,308 130,762 71,822 347 234,906 $1,456,073 1,104 218,795 $1,324,917 Note 14 – Goodwill and other intangible assets: The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, allocated by reportable segments and corporate group, were as follows (refer to Note 39 for the definition of the Corporation’s reportable segments): 2010 Balance at January 1, 2010 Goodwill on acquisition Purchase accounting adjustments Other Balance at December 31, 2010 (In thousands) Banco Popular de Puerto Rico $157,025 $88,284 Banco Popular North America Corporate 402,078 45,246 – – Total Popular, Inc. $604,349 $88,284 – $245,309 – ($45,246) 402,078 – ($45,246) $647,387 – – – – 2009 (In thousands) Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Corporate Total Popular, Inc. Balance at January 1, 2009 Goodwill on acquisition Purchase accounting adjustments Other Balance at December 31, 2009 $157,059 404,237 44,496 $605,792 – – – – $(34) – $157,025 – 750 ($2,159) – 402,078 45,246 $716 ($2,159) $604,349 145 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The goodwill recognized in the BPPR reportable segment during 2010 relates mostly to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the accounting for the transaction and the resulting goodwill recognition. The fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Any changes in such fair value estimates may impact the goodwill initially recorded. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, retrospective adjustments were made to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction in order to reflect new information obtained during the measurement period (as defined by ASC Topic 805). The revision resulted in a decrease of $19 million in the goodwill initially recorded. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the accounting for the transaction and the resulting goodwill recognition. On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of the processing and technology business, which resulted in a $45 million reduction in goodwill for the Corporation. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the sale. EVERTEC’s goodwill for periods prior to the sale was included in the Corporate group since EVERTEC is no longer considered a reportable segment as discussed in Note 39 to the consolidated financial statements. contingent For the year ended December 31, 2009, the purchase accounting adjustments in the Corporate reportable segment the consisted of contractual contingency period. The $2 million included in the segment represented the assigned goodwill associated with the six New Jersey branches of BPNA that was written-off upon their sale in October 2009. consideration paid during the BPNA reportable category at “other” The following table presents the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses at the beginning and the end of the year by reportable segment and Corporate group. (In thousands) Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Corporate Total Popular, Inc. (In thousands) Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Corporate Total Popular, Inc. 2010 Balance at January 1, 2010 (gross amounts) Accumulated impairment losses Balance at January 1, 2010 (net amounts) Balance at December 31, 2010 (gross amounts) Accumulated impairment losses Balance at December 31, 2010 (net amounts) $157,025 566,489 45,429 $768,943 – $164,411 183 $164,594 $157,025 402,078 45,246 $604,349 $245,309 566,489 – $811,798 – $164,411 – $164,411 $245,309 402,078 – $647,387 2009 Balance at January 1, 2009 (gross amounts) Accumulated impairment losses Balance at January 1, 2009 (net amounts) Balance at December 31 2009 (gross amounts) Accumulated impairment losses Balance at December 31, 2009 (net amounts) $157,059 568,648 44,679 $770,386 – $164,411 183 $164,594 $157,059 404,237 44,496 $605,792 $157,025 566,489 45,429 $768,943 – $164,411 183 $164,594 $157,025 402,078 45,246 $604,349 The accumulated impairment losses in the BPNA reportable segment are associated with E-LOAN. The Corporation’s goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit. Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step of the goodwill impairment the involves comparing the fair value of test reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed. The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions, thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under applicable accounting standards. The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization during the third quarter of 2010 using July 31, 2010 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push- down accounting, as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination. In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses combination of methods, a including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in specific lines of business, and any particular in the individual reporting units. features The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include: k a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size; k a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; 146 k the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity; k the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and k the market growth and new business assumptions. For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of judgment. growth assumptions For purposes of the discounted cash flows (“DCF”) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the financial projections presented to the valuation date) / Liability Management Committee Corporation’s Asset (“ALCO”). The included in these projections are based on management’s expectations for each reporting unit’s financial prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity (i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 8.42% to 23.24% for the 2010 analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return of a “risk-free” asset (10-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as equity risk premium, size premium, and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made when necessary. For BPNA, the only reporting unit that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of Step 1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market multiples used included “price to book” and “price to tangible book”. Additionally, the Corporation determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on BPNA’s financial projections, but assigned no weight to it given that the current market approaches provide a more meaningful measure of fair value considering the reporting unit’s financial performance and current market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31), requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting the Corporation performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, standards, 147 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNA’s net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from BPNA’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $402 million at July 31, 2010, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in BPNA’s Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill. The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not to the fair value of the reporting unit as a going concern. The current negative performance of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan portfolio, which is consistent with the results of the Step 2 analysis. The fair value determined for BPNA’s loan portfolio in the July 31, 2010 annual test represented a discount of 23.6%, compared with 20.2% at December 31, 2009. The discount is mainly attributed to market participant’s expected rate of returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA. Refer to Note 39 to the consolidated financial statements, which provides highlights of BPNA’s reportable segment financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2010. BPNA’s provision for loan losses, as a stand-alone legal entity, which is the reporting unit level used for the goodwill impairment analysis, amounted to $397 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, which represented 122% of BPNA legal loss of $326 million for that period. The provision for loan losses included charges of $120 million to the provision for loan losses related to a reclassification to loans held-for-sale of approximately $396 million (book value) of non-conventional mortgage loans in December 2010. entity’s net If the Step 1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a third- party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNA’s goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNA’s loan portfolios as of the July 31, 2010 valuation date. Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for conclusions and determined they were reasonable. Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. the fair value results determined for the concluding that reporting units in the July 31, 2010 annual assessment were reasonable. The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporation’s market capitalization increase the risk of goodwill impairment in the future. Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Management continued monitoring the fair value of the reporting units, particularly BPNA. As part of the monitoring process, management performed an assessment for BPNA at December 31, 2010. The Corporation determined BPNA’s fair value utilizing the same valuation approaches (market and DCF) used in the annual goodwill impairment test. The determined fair value for BPNA at December 31, 2010 continued to be below its carrying amount under all valuation approaches. The fair value determination of BPNA’s assets and liabilities was updated at December 31, 2010 utilizing valuation methodologies consistent with the July 31, 2010 test. The results of the assessment at December 31, 2010 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying amount, resulting in results obtained in the no goodwill December 31, 2010 assessment were consistent with the results of the annual impairment test in that the reduction in the fair value of BPNA was mainly attributable to a significant reduction in the fair value of BPNA’s loan portfolio. impairment. The At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite $6 million of useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’s trademark. The valuation of the E-LOAN trademark was performed using a valuation approach called the “relief-from-royalty” method. The basis of the “relief-from-royalty” method is that, by virtue of having ownership of the trademark, the Corporation is relieved from having to pay a royalty, usually expressed as a percentage of revenue, for the use of trademark. The main attributes involved in the valuation of this intangible asset include the royalty rate, revenue projections that benefit from the use of this intangible, after-tax royalty savings derived from the ownership of the intangible, and the discount rate to apply to the projected benefits to arrive at the present value of this intangible. Since estimates are an integral part of this trademark impairment analysis, changes in these estimates could have a significant value. There were no impact on the impairments recognized during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 related to E-LOAN’s trademark. calculated fair The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization: Corporation’s pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows: 148 (In thousands) Core deposits Other customer relationships Other intangibles Total 2010 Accumulated Amortization $29,817 3,430 43 $33,290 Gross Amount $80,591 5,092 189 $85,872 2009 Accumulated Amortization $30,991 5,804 71 $36,866 Gross Amount $65,379 8,816 125 $74,320 During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $24 million in a core deposit intangible asset associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. This core deposit is to be amortized to operating expenses ratably on a monthly basis over a 10-year period. intangible asset Certain core deposits and other customer relationships intangibles with a gross amount of $9 million and $1 million respectively, became fully amortized during 2010, and, as such, their gross amount and accumulated amortization were eliminated from the tabular disclosure presented above. The decrease category was associated to the sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. relationships in other customer (In thousands) Investment securities 2010 2009 available-for-sale, at fair value $1,867,249 $1,923,338 Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC Total pledged assets 25,770 125,769 2,862 2,254 4,787,002 – 9,695,200 8,993,967 57,565 $16,435,648 – $11,045,328 Pledged securities and loans that the creditor has the right by custom or contract to repledge are presented separately on the consolidated statements of condition. At 31, December securities 2010, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity totaling $1.3 billion, and loans of $0.5 million, served as collateral to secure public funds. investment During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $9.2 million in amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (2009 — $9.5 million; 2008-$11.5 million). The following table presents the estimated amortization of the lives for each of the intangible assets with definite useful following periods: (In thousands) Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013 Year 2014 Year 2015 $9,020 8,493 8,309 7,666 5,522 Note 15 – Pledged assets: At December 31, 2010 and 2009, certain securities, loans and other real estate owned were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative positions, loan servicing agreements and the loss sharing agreements with the the FDIC. The classification and carrying amount of The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB) and from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“Fed”). At December 31, 2010, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating $1.6 billion. Refer to Notes 19 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements for borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. At December 31, 2010, the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $3.8 billion in loans held-in-portfolio. Also, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of $2.7 billion, which remained unused as of such date. The amount available under this credit facility is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. At December 31, 2010, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $5.4 billion in loans held-in-portfolio. These pledged assets are included in the above table and were not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statement of condition at December 31, 2010. Loans held-in-portfolio and other real estate owned that are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC amounting to $4.8 billion at December 31, 2010, serve as collateral to secure the note issued to the FDIC. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for descriptive information on the note issued to the FDIC. Note 16 – Related party transactions: The Corporation grants loans to its directors, executive officers and certain related individuals or organizations in the ordinary 149 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT course of business. The movement and balance of these loans were as follows: (In thousands) Balance at December 31, 2008 New loans Payments Other changes Balance at December 31, 2009 New loans Payments Other changes Balance at December 31, 2010 Executive Officers Directors $41,339 $4,482 54,639 4,944 (43,409) (3,717) – (417) $52,569 $5,292 91,701 1,890 (47,646) (240) (579) (3,461) $96,045 $3,481 Total $45,821 59,583 (47,126) (417) $57,861 93,591 (47,886) (4,040) $99,526 The amounts reported as “other changes” include changes in the status of those who are considered related parties. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries from related parties, excluding EVERTEC, held deposits amounting to $45 million (2009 - $38 million). services From time to time, the Corporation, in the ordinary course of from related parties or makes business, obtains contributions to non-profit organizations that have some association with the Corporation. Management believes the terms of such arrangements are consistent with arrangements entered into with independent third parties. During 2010, the Corporation engaged, in the ordinary course of business, the legal services of certain law firms in Puerto Rico, in which the Secretary of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and immediate family members of one executive officer and a former executive officer of the Corporation acted as Senior Counsel or as partners. The fees paid to these law firms for the year 2010 amounted to approximately $2.4 million (2009 - $3.2 million). These fees included $0.5 million (2009 - $0.6 million) paid by the Corporation’s clients in connection with commercial loan transactions and $29 thousand (2009 - $41 thousand) paid by mutual funds managed by BPPR. In addition, one of these law firms leases office space in the Corporation’s headquarters building, which is owned by BPPR. During 2010, this law firm made lease payments of approximately $0.8 million (2009 - $1 million). This law firm also engages BPPR as trustee of its retirement plan and paid approximately $50 thousand for these services in 2010 (2009 - $31 thousand). For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation made contributions of approximately $0.6 million to Banco Popular Foundations, which are not-for-profit corporations dedicated to philanthropic work (2009 - $0.6 million). In August 2009, BPPR sold part of the real estate assets and related construction permits, which had been received from a bank commercial customer as part of a workout agreement, to a limited liability company (the “LLC”) for $13.5 million. The LLC is controlled by two family members of an executive officer of the Corporation, one which is a director of the Corporation. BPPR received two offers from reputable developers and builders, and the LLC offered the higher bid amount. The sale price the real estate according to an represented the value of appraisal report. The transaction was approved by the appropriate committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. BPPR provided a loan facility to finance the acquisition and completion of construction project. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had recognized a loss of $8.6 million out of an outstanding principal balance of $15.7 million of loan facilities made to the LLC. residential the The Corporation has had loan transactions with the Corporation’s directors and officers, and with their associates, and proposes to continue such transactions in the ordinary course of its business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing for comparable loan transactions with third parties. The extensions of credit have not involved and do not currently involve more than normal risks of collection or present other unfavorable features, except as disclosed above in connection with the loan to the LLC. 2010, on September As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation 30, completed the sale of a majority interest in EVERTEC. The following table presents the impact on the Corporation’s results of operations of transactions between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) for the period from October 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. For consolidation purposes, the Corporation eliminates 49% of such income (expense) from the corresponding categories in the consolidated statement of operations and the net effect of all items at 49% is eliminated against other operating income, which is the category used to record the Corporation’s share of income (loss) as part of its equity method investment in EVERTEC. (In thousands) Interest income on loan to EVERTEC Interest income on investment securities issued by EVERTEC Interest expense on deposits ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC Rental income charged to 51% majority interest 100% Category $1,188 $606 Interest income 963 93 491 47 Interest income Interest expense 1,688 861 Other service fees 37,579 19,165 Professional fees EVERTEC 2,009 1,025 Transition services provided to EVERTEC 321 164 Net occupancy Other operating expenses The Corporation had the following financial condition accounts outstanding with EVERTEC at December 31, 2010. 150 (In thousands) Loans Investment securities Deposits Accounts receivables Accounts payable 100% $58,126 35,000 38,761 3,922 17,416 51% majority interest $29,644 Category Loans The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was $52 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $44 million). 17,850 19,768 2,000 8,882 Investment securities Deposits Other assets Other liabilities Note 18 – Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase: The following table summarizes certain information on federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase at December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008: Note 17 – Deposits: Total interest bearing deposits at December 31, consisted of: (Dollars in thousands) Federal funds purchased Assets sold under agreements 2010 2009 – – 2008 $144,471 (In thousands) 2010 2009 to repurchase $2,412,550 $2,632,790 3,407,137 Savings accounts NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits Certificates of deposit: Under $100,000 $100,000 and over Total certificates of deposit Total interest bearing deposits $6,177,074 $5,480,124 4,756,615 4,726,204 $10,933,689 $10,206,328 $6,238,229 4,650,961 10,889,190 $21,822,879 $6,553,022 4,670,243 11,223,265 $21,429,593 A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at December 31, 2010, follows: (In thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 and thereafter Total certificates of deposit $ 7,356,691 1,501,630 657,112 393,903 905,301 74,553 $10,889,190 At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had brokered certificates of deposit amounting to $2.3 billion (2009 - $2.7 billion) Total federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month- end Average monthly aggregate balance outstanding Weighted average interest rate: For the year At December 31 $2,412,550 $2,632,790 $3,551,608 $2,672,553 $3,938,845 $5,697,842 $2,356,100 $2,844,975 $4,163,015 2.55% 2.34% 2.45% 2.42% 3.37% 1.45% The repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2010 were collateralized by $2.1 billion in investment securities available for sale and $492 million in trading securities. It is the corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statement of condition. In addition, there were repurchase agreement outstanding collateralized by $172 million in securities purchased underlying agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to repledge. It is the Corporation’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities, and accordingly are not reflected in the corporation’s consolidated statements of condition. 151 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table presents the liability associated with the repurchase transactions (including accrued interest), their maturities and weighted average interest rates. Also, it includes the carrying value and approximate market value of the collateral (including accrued interest) at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The information excludes repurchase agreement transactions which were collateralized with securities or other assets held-for-trading purposes or which have been obtained under agreements to resell. 2010 2009 Repurchase liability Carrying value of collateral Market value of collateral Weighted average interest rate Repurchase liability Carrying value of collateral Market value of collateral Weighted average interest rate $205,320 373,333 $216,530 426,664 $216,530 426,664 0.37% 4.22 – $398,862 – $456,368 – $456,368 – 4.06% (Dollars in thousands) Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Within 30 days After 90 days Total obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities 578,653 643,194 643,194 2.85 398,862 456,368 456,368 4.06 Mortgage-backed securities Overnight Within 30 days After 30 to 90 days After 90 days Total mortgage-backed securities Collateralized mortgage obligations Overnight Within 30 days After 30 to 90 days After 90 days Total collateralized mortgage obligations Total – 84,345 32,261 561,790 678,396 – 90,434 32,415 644,943 767,792 – 90,434 32,415 644,943 767,792 – 0.33 5.29 4.40 3.94 4,855 125,428 – 602,416 732,699 4,876 131,941 – 686,147 822,964 4,876 131,941 – 686,147 822,964 – 280,951 89,561 173,840 544,352 $1,801,401 – 329,634 103,398 244,078 677,110 $2,088,096 – 329,634 103,398 244,078 677,110 $2,088,096 28,844 – 331,142 0.38 312,657 0.38 302,818 4.26 1.62 975,461 2.89% $2,107,022 46,746 362,901 345,786 354,969 1,110,402 $2,389,734 46,746 362,901 345,786 354,969 1,110,402 $2,389,734 0.30 0.40 – 4.21 3.53 0.30 0.42 0.51 3.63 1.44 2.66% Note 19 – Other short-term borrowings: The following table presents a breakdown of other short-term borrowings at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Secured borrowing with clearing broker with an interest rate of 1.50% Advances with the FHLB maturing in January 2011 paying interest at maturity, at fixed rates ranging from 0.36% to 0.44% Term funds purchased maturing in 2011 paying interest at maturity, at fixed rates ranging from 1.15% to 1.25% Securities sold not yet purchased Others Total other short-term borrowings 2010 2009 – $6,000 The maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month- end was approximately $364 million (2009 - $205 million; 2008 - $1.6 billion). The weighted average interest rate of other short- term borrowings at December 31, 2010 was 0.54% (2009 - 2.74%; balance outstanding during the year was approximately $45 million (2009 - $43 million; 2008 - $952 million). The weighted average interest rate during the year was 1.13% (2009 - 0.95%; 2008 - 2.98%). 2008 - 1.35%). The aggregate average $300,000 – Note 21 presents additional information with respect to available credit facilities. 52,500 10,459 1,263 $364,222 – – 1,326 $7,326 152 date of September 2011. Also, during 2010, the Corporation prepaid $363 million of advances with the FHLB. the note statements, In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR issued to the FDIC a secured note (the “note issued to the FDIC”) in the amount of $5.8 billion as of April 30, 2010 bearing a fixed annual interest rate of 2.50%, which has full recourse to BPPR. As indicated in Notes 3 and 15 to the consolidated financial issued to the FDIC is collateralized by the loans (other than certain consumer loans) and other real estate acquired in the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from such assets, including cash inflows from claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. Proceeds received from such sources are used to pay the note issued to the FDIC under the conditions stipulated in the agreement. The entire outstanding principal balance of the note issued to the FDIC is due five years from issuance (April 30, 2015), or such date as such amount may become due and payable pursuant to the terms of the note. Borrowings under the note bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 2.50% and are paid monthly. If the Corporation fails to pay any interest as and when due, such interest shall accrue interest at the note interest rate plus 2.00% per annum. The Corporation may repay the note in whole or in part without any penalty subject to certain notification requirements indicated in the agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation prepaid $2.6 billion of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets securing the note. The following table presents the aggregate amounts by contractual maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2010. Given the nature of the note issued to the FDIC, its maturity was based on expected repayment dates and not on its April 30, 2015 contractual maturity date. The expected repayments consider the timing of expected cash inflows on the loans, OREO and claims on the loss sharing agreements that will be applied to repay the note, as well as prepayments, during the period that the note payable to the FDIC is outstanding. Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Later years No stated maturity Subtotal Less: Discount Total (In thousands) $2,672,588 525,538 53,780 10,824 945 461,527 936,000 $4,661,202 (491,019) $4,170,183 Note 20 – Notes payable: Notes payable outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, consisted of the following: (In thousands) 2010 2009 Advances with the FHLB: - with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2014 paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from 3.52% to 4.95% (2009 - 1.48% to 5.06%) - maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% Note issued to the FDIC, including unamortized premium of $2,438; paying interest monthly at annual fixed rate of 2.50%; maturing on April 30, 2015 or such earlier date as such amount become due and payable pursuant to the terms of the note Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2013 paying interest semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 13.00% (2009 - 5.20% to 12.00%) Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2013 paying interest monthly at floating rates of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate Term notes maturing in 2011 paying interest quarterly at a floating rate of 8.25% over the 3-month LIBOR rate Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 through 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 23) Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) ($936,000 less discount of $491,019 at December 31, 2010 and $512,350 at December 31, 2009) with no stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.00% thereafter(Refer to Note 23) Other Total notes payable $385,000 $1,103,627 – 20,000 2,492,928 – 381,133 382,858 1,010 1,528 – 250,000 439,800 439,800 444,981 25,331 423,650 27,169 $4,170,183 $2,648,632 Note: Key index rates at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were as follows: 3-month LIBOR rate = 0.30% and 0.25%; 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate = 3.30% and 3.84%. During 2010, the following events impacted the reduction in term notes from December 31, 2009: (1) the exercise of a put option by the holder of $75 million in term notes during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and (2) the repurchase and cancellation in July 2010 of $175 million in term notes with interest that adjusted in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes had a maturity 153 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Note 21 – Unused lines of credit and other funding sources: At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had borrowing facilities available with the FHLB whereby the Corporation could borrow up to $1.6 billion based on the assets pledged with the FHLB at that date (2009 - $1.9 billion). Refer to Notes 19 and 20 for the amounts of FHLB advances outstanding under these facilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The FHLB advances at December 31, 2010 are collateralized with mortgage and commercial loans, and do not have restrictive covenants or callable features. The maximum borrowing capacity is dependent on certain computations as determined by the FHLB, which consider the amount and type of assets available for collateral. The Corporation has a borrowing facility at the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. At December 31, 2010, the borrowing capacity at the discount window approximated $2.7 billion (2009 - $2.9 billion), which remained unused at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. Note 22 – Exchange offers: In June 2009, the Corporation commenced an offer to issue shares of its common stock in exchange for its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock and for trust preferred securities (also referred to as “capital securities”). the Corporation completed the On August 25, 2009, settlement of the exchange offer and issued over 357 million new shares of common stock. Exchange of preferred stock for common stock The exchange by holders of shares of the Series A and B non- cumulative preferred stock for shares of common stock resulted in the extinguishment of such shares of preferred stock and an issuance of shares of common stock. In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50 per share of its common stock and an exchange ratio of 80% of the preferred stock liquidation value to determine the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the tendered shares of Series A and B preferred stock. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was the price at August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying (liquidation) value of each share of Series A and B preferred stock exchanged was reduced and common stock and surplus increased in the amount of the fair value of the common stock issued. The Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share). The excess of the common stock fair value over the par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess of the carrying amount of the shares of preferred stock over the fair value of the shares of common stock was recorded as a reduction to accumulated deficit and an increase (“EPS”) computations. common share in income (loss) per The following table presents the results of the exchange offer with respect to the Series A and B preferred stock. Shares of preferred stock outstanding prior to exchange Shares of preferred stock exchanged Shares of preferred stock outstanding after exchange Aggregate liquidation preference amount after exchange (in thousands) Shares of common stock issued 7,475,000 6,589,274 885,726 $22,143 52,714,192 16,000,000 14,879,335 1,120,665 $28,017 119,034,680 Per security liquidation preference amount $25 $25 Title of securities 6.375% Non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A 8.25% Non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, Series B The exchange of shares of preferred stock for shares of common stock resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $230.4 million, which is also considered in the income (loss) per common share computations. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of EPS. Common stock issued in connection with early extinguishment of debt (exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock) During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation exchanged trust preferred securities issued by different trusts for shares of common stock of the Corporation. Refer to the table that follows for a list of such securities and trusts. The trust preferred securities were delivered to the trusts in return for the junior subordinated debentures (recorded as notes payable in the Corporation’s financial statements) that had been issued by the Corporation to the trusts. The junior subordinated debentures were submitted for cancellation by the indenture trustee under the applicable indenture. The Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain of $80.3 million on the extinguishment of the applicable junior subordinated debentures, which was included in the the year ended consolidated statement of operations December 31, 2009. This transaction was accounted for as an early extinguishment of debt. for 154 In accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, the Corporation used a relevant price of $2.50 per share of its common stock and the exchange ratios referred to in the table that follows to determine the number of shares of its common stock issued in exchange for the validly tendered trust preferred securities. The fair value of the common stock was $1.71 per share, which was the price at August 20, 2009, the expiration date of the exchange offer. The carrying value of the junior subordinated debentures was reduced and common stock and surplus increased in the amount of the fair value of the common stock issued. The Corporation recorded the par amount of the shares issued as common stock ($0.01 per common share). The excess of the common stock fair value over the par amount was recorded in surplus. The excess of the carrying amount of the junior subordinated debentures retired over the fair value of the common stock issued was recorded as a gain on early extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. Liquidation preference amount per TRUPS TRUPS exchange value TRUPS outstanding prior to exchange TRUPS exchanged for common stock TRUPS outstanding after exchange Aggregate liquidation preference amount of TRUPS after exchange (In thousands) Aggregate liquidation preference amount of junior 8.327% TRUPS (issued by BanPonce Trust I) 6.70%TRUPS (issued by Popular Capital Trust I) $1,000 $1,150 or 115% 144,000 91,135 52,865 $25 $30 or 120% 12,000,000 4,757,480 7,242,520 6.564% TRUPS (issued by Popular North America Capital Trust I) $1,000 $1,150 or 115% 250,000 158,349 91,651 6.125% TRUPS (issued by Popular Capital Trust II) $25 $30 or 120% 5,200,000 1,159,080 4,040,920 $52,865 $181,063 $91,651 $101,023 subordinated debentures after exchange (In thousands) $54,502 $186,664 $94,486 $104,148 The increase in stockholders’ equity related to the exchange of trust preferred securities for shares of common stock was approximately $390 million, net of issuance costs, and including the gain on the early extinguishment of debt. Exchange of preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities Also, on August 21, 2009, the Corporation and Popular Capital Trust III entered into an exchange agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“U.S. Treasury”) pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury agreed with the Corporation that the U.S. Treasury would exchange all 935,000 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), owned by the U.S Treasury for 935,000 newly issued trust preferred securities, $1,000 liquidation amount per capital security. The trust preferred securities were issued to the U.S. Treasury on August 24, 2009. In connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of the issuance and sale by the trust to the Corporation of $1 million aggregate liquidation amount of its fixed rate common securities, to purchase $936 million aggregate principal amount of the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation. The trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury have a distribution rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013, and 9% thereafter (which is the same as the dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock). The common securities of the trust, in the amount of $1 million, are held by the Corporation. The sole asset and only source of funds to make payments on the trust preferred securities and the common securities of the trust is $936 million of Popular’s Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A, issued by the Corporation to the trust. These debentures have an interest rate of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013, and 9% thereafter. The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by the Corporation at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Under the guarantee agreement dated as of August 24, 2009, the Corporation irrevocably and unconditionally agrees to pay in full to the holders of the trust preferred securities the guarantee payments, as and when due. The Corporation’s obligation to make the guaranteed payment may be satisfied by direct payment of the required amounts to the holders of the trust preferred securities or by causing the issuer trust to pay such amounts to the holders. The obligations of the Corporation under the guarantee agreement constitute unsecured obligations and rank subordinate and junior in right of payment to all senior debt. The obligations of the Corporation under the guarantee agreement rank pari passu with the obligations of Popular under any similar guarantee agreements issued by the Corporation on behalf of the holders of preferred or capital securities issued by any statutory trust, among others stated in the guarantee agreement. Under the guarantee agreement, the Corporation has guaranteed the payment of the liquidation amount of the trust preferred securities upon liquidation of the trust, but only to the extent that the trust has funds available to make such payments. 155 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Under the exchange agreement, the Corporation agreed that, without the consent of the U.S. Treasury, it would not increase its dividend rate per share of common stock above that in effect as of October 14, 2008 or repurchase shares of its common stock until, in each case, the earlier of December 5, 2011 or such time as all of the new trust preferred securities have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury. 9% thereafter; (2) assumed maturity date of 30 years; and (3) assumed discount rate of 16%. The assumed discount rate used for estimating the fair value was estimated by obtaining the yields at which comparably-rated issuers were trading in the market and considering the amount of trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury and the credit rating of the Corporation. Note 23 – Trust preferred securities: At December 31, 2010 and 2009, four statutory trusts established by the Corporation (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) had issued trust preferred securities (also referred to as “capital securities”) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the “common securities”), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the “junior subordinated debentures”) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of issuance and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the impact of the exchange transactions on the trust preferred securities. The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the Corporation pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer securities. The trusts are included as other common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation. investment The warrant to purchase 20,932,836 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.70 per share that was initially issued to the U.S Treasury in connection with the issuance of the Series C preferred stock on December 5, 2008 remains outstanding without amendment. The trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury to the 25% subject qualify as Tier 1 regulatory capital limitation on Tier 1 capital. this junior impact transaction subordinated debentures accounting recognition of The Corporation paid an exchange fee of $13 million to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the exchange of outstanding shares of Series C preferred stock for the new trust preferred securities. This exchange fee is being amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the estimated life of the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation. This transaction with the U.S. Treasury was accounted for as an extinguishment of previously issued Series C preferred stock. included The of and (1) derecognition of the Series C preferred stock; (2) recognition of a favorable impact to accumulated deficit resulting from the excess of (a) the carrying amount of the securities exchanged (the the Series C preferred stock) over (b) the fair value of consideration exchanged (the trust preferred securities); (3) the reversal of any unamortized discount outstanding on the Series C preferred stock; and (4) recognition of issuance costs. The reduction in total stockholders’ equity related to the U.S. Treasury exchange transaction at the exchange rate was approximately $416 million, which was principally impacted by the reduction of $935 million of aggregate liquidation preference value of the Series C preferred stock, partially offset by the $519 million discount on the junior subordinated debentures described in item (2) above. This discount as well as the debt issue costs will be amortized through interest expense using the interest yield method over the estimated life of the junior subordinated debentures. This particular exchange resulted in a favorable impact to accumulated deficit on the exchange date of $485.3 million, which is also considered in the income (loss) per common share computations. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of EPS. The fair value of the trust preferred securities (junior subordinated debentures for purposes of the Corporation’s financial statements) at the date of the exchange agreement was determined internally using a discounted cash flow model. The main considerations were (1) quarterly interest payment of 5% until, but excluding December 5, 2013, and The following table presents financial data pertaining to the different trusts at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (Dollars in thousands) Issuer Capital securities Distribution rate Common securities Junior subordinated debentures aggregate liquidation amount Stated maturity date Reference notes BanPonce Trust I Popular Capital Trust I Popular North America Capital Trust I Popular Capital Trust II Popular Capital Trust III $52,865 8.327% $181,063 6.700% $91,651 6.564% $1,637 $5,601 $2,835 $101,023 $935,000 6.125% 5.000% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.000% thereafter $1,000 $3,125 $54,502 $104,148 February 2027 November 2033 September 2034 December 2034 [b],[d],[e] [b],[d],[e] $186,664 [a],[c],[e] [a],[c],[f] $94,486 $936,000 Perpetual [b],[d],[g],[h] [a] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (“PNA”) and indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. [b] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. [c] The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. [d] These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. [e] The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below, the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. [f] Same as [e] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early redemption. [g] The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. [h] Carrying value of junior subordinates debentures of $445 million at December 31, 2010 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $491 million discount) and $424 million at December 31, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $512 million discount). In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities restricted core capital represent elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25 percent of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation. Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the quantitative limit which would limit restricted 156 core capital elements included in the Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit will be effective on March 31, 2011. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the use of trust preferred securities issued before May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital over a 3-year period commencing on January 1, 2013. Trust preferred securities issued on or after May 19, 2010 no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. The Corporation has not issued any trust preferred securities since May 19, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the remaining trust preferred securities corresponded to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act includes an exemption from the phase-out provision that applies to these capital securities because they were issued prior to October 4, 2010. Note 24 – Stockholder’s equity: The Corporation has 30,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock that may be issued in one or more series, and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. The Corporation’s preferred stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of: k 6.375% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Holders on record of the 2003 Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation or an authorized committee thereof, out of funds legally available, non-cumulative cash dividends at the annual rate per share of 6.375% of their liquidation preference value, or $0.1328125 per share per month. These shares of preferred stock are perpetual, nonconvertible, have no preferential rights to purchase any securities of the Corporation and are redeemable solely at the option of the Corporation with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System beginning on March 31, 2008. The redemption price per share at December 31, 2010 and thereafter is $25.00. The shares of 2003 Series A Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except for certain rights in instances when the Corporation does not pay dividends for a defined period. These shares are not subject to any sinking fund requirement. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2003 Series A Preferred Stock the year ended amounted to $117.6 thousand for December 2008 - $11.9 million). Outstanding shares of 2003 Series A (2009 - $6.0 million; 2010 31, 157 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT preferred stock totaled 885,726 at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (2008 - 7,475,000 outstanding shares). k 8.25% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2008 Series B, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. The shares of 2008 Series B Preferred Stock were issued in May 2008. Holders of record of the 2008 Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation or an authorized committee thereof, out of funds legally available, non-cumulative cash dividends at the annual rate per share of 8.25% of their liquidation preferences, or $0.171875 per share per month. These shares of preferred stock are perpetual, nonconvertible, have no preferential rights to purchase any securities of the Corporation and are redeemable solely at the option of the Corporation with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System beginning on May 28, 2013. The redemption price per share is $25.50 from May 28, 2013 through May 28, 2014, $25.25 from May 28, 2014 through May 28, 2015 and $25.00 from May 28, 2015 and thereafter. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued on May 28, 2008 at a purchase price of $25 per share. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2008 Series B Preferred Stock amounted to $192.6 thousand for the year ended 2008 - December $19.5 million). Outstanding shares of 2008 Series B preferred stock totaled 1,120,665 at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (2008 - 16,000,000 outstanding shares). 31, 2010 (2009 - $16.5 million; 2008 under k At December 31, 2008, the Corporation had outstanding 935,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, $1,000 liquidation preference per share issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury the in December (“U.S. Treasury”) U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock qualified as Tier I regulatory capital and paid cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per five years, and 9% per annum annum for the first thereafter. During 2009, the Corporation exchanged newly issued trust preferred securities for the shares of Series C Preferred Stock held by the U.S. Treasury. After the exchange, the newly issued trust preferred securities continue to qualify as Tier 1 regulatory capital subject to the 25% limitation on Tier 1 capital explained in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the exchange agreement dated August 21, 2009 related to these shares of preferred stock. The Corporation paid cash dividends on the Series C preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2009 amounting to $20.8 million. Dividends accrued on the Series C Preferred Stock amounted ended December 31, 2008. Also, during the year ended $3.4 million for year the to December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized through accumulated deficit the accretion of the Series C Preferred Stock discount amounting to $4.5 million (2008 - $483 thousand). a warrant the U.S. Treasury As part of the Series C preferred stock transaction with the U.S. Treasury effected on December 5, 2008, the Corporation issued to to purchase 20,932,836 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.70 per share, which continues to be outstanding in full and without amendment at December 31, 2010. The warrant is immediately exercisable, subject to certain restrictions, and has a 10-year term. The exercise price and number of shares subject to the warrant are both subject to anti-dilution adjustments. U.S. Treasury may not exercise voting power with respect to shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the warrant. Neither the Series C preferred stock (exchanged for trust preferred securities) nor the warrant nor the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant are subject to any contractual restriction on transfer. The Corporation’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ”) under the symbol BPOP. On September 18, 2009, the Corporation announced the voluntary delisting of its 2003 Series A and 2008 Series B preferred stock from the NASDAQ effective October 8, 2009. On May 4, 2010, following stockholder approval, the Corporation amended its restated certificate of incorporation to provide for an increase in the number of shares of the Corporation’s common stock authorized for issuance from 700 million shares to 1.7 billion shares. In April 2010, the Corporation raised $1.15 billion through the sale of 46,000,000 depositary shares, each representing a 1/ 40th interest in a share of Contingent Convertible Perpetual Non- Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value, $1,000 liquidation preference per share. The preferred stock represented by depositary shares automatically converted into shares of the Corporation’s common stock at a conversion rate of 8.3333 shares of common stock for each depositary share on May 11, 2010, which was the 5th business day after the Corporation’s common stockholders approved the amendment to the Corporation’s restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. The conversion of the depositary shares of preferred stock resulted in the issuance of 383,333,333 additional shares of common stock. The net proceeds from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion, after deducting the expenses. underwriting discount Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements provides information on the impact of the conversion on net income per common share. and estimated offering During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation issued 357,510,076 new shares of common stock in exchange of its Series A and Series B preferred stock and trust preferred in common securities, which resulted in an increase 158 capital adequacy guidelines Note 25 - Regulatory capital requirements: The Corporation and its banking subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory capital requirements imposed by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can lead to certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial and the statements. Under regulatory framework for prompt the Federal Reserve Board and the other bank regulators have adopted quantitative measures which assign risk weightings to assets and off-balance sheet items and also define and set minimum regulatory capital requirements. Rules adopted by the federal banking agencies provide that a depository institution will be deemed to be well capitalized if it maintains a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based ratio of at least 10%. Management has determined that at December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation exceeded all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. corrective action, the At December 31, 2010 and 2009, BPPR and BPNA were well- capitalized under regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. At December 31, 2010, management believes that there were no conditions or events since the most recent notification date that could have changed the institution’s category. The Corporation has been designated by the Federal Reserve Board as a Financial Holding Company (“FHC”) and is eligible to engage in certain financial activities permitted under the Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. stockholders’ equity of $923 million. This increase included newly issued common stock and surplus of $612.4 million and a favorable impact to accumulated deficit of $311 million, including $80.3 million in gains on the extinguishment of junior subordinated debentures that relate to the trust preferred securities. Refer to Note 22 for information on the exchange offers. On February 19, 2009, the the Board of Directors of the Corporation resolved to retire 13,597,261 shares of the Corporation’s common stock that were held by Corporation as the Corporation’s accounting policy to account, at retirement, for the excess of the cost of the treasury stock over its par value entirely to surplus. The impact of the retirement is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity. treasury shares. is It The Corporation’s common stock ranks junior to all series of preferred stock as to dividend rights and / or as to rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. Dividends on each series of preferred stock are payable if declared. The Corporation’s ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the Corporation fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest dividend period. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends in the future is limited by regulatory requirements, the Corporation’s agreements with the U.S. Treasury described recent and projected above, financial the Corporation, general business conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. legal availability of liquidity results, capital funds, levels and of During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation did not declare dividends on its common stock (2009 - cash common share outstanding or dividends of $0.02 per or $5.6 million; share common $134.9 million). There were no dividends payable to shareholders of common stock at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (2008 - $23 million). 2008 - $0.48 per The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay the Puerto Rico dividends without the prior consent of to Commissioner of Financial maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPR’s statutory reserve fund totaled $402 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $402 million; 2008 - $392 million). During 2010, there were no transfers to the statutory reserve account (2009 - $10 million; 2008 - $18 million). At December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, BPPR was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement. Institutions. The failure 159 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following tables present the Corporation’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Capital adequacy minimum requirement Actual (In thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 2010 Total Capital (to Risk- Weighted Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Average Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA $4,061,883 2,450,628 1,244,884 15.81% 13.15 18.87 $2,054,994 1,490,620 527,775 $3,733,776 2,028,968 1,159,245 14.54% 10.89 17.57 $1,027,497 745,310 263,887 $3,733,776 9.72% 2,028,968 7.07 1,159,245 12.86 $1,152,001 1,536,001 860,981 1,148,066 270,480 360,639 8% 8 8 4% 4 4 3% 4 3 4 3 4 Capital adequacy minimum requirement Actual (In thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 2009 Total Capital (to Risk- Weighted Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Average Assets): Corporation BPPR BPNA $2,910,442 2,233,995 866,811 11.13% 12.56 10.86 $2,091,750 1,423,486 638,815 $2,563,915 1,575,837 760,181 9.81% 8.86 9.52 $1,045,875 711,743 319,407 $2,563,915 7.50% 1,575,837 760,181 6.87 7.15 $1,025,917 1,367,890 688,612 918,149 318,853 425,137 8% 8 8 4% 4 4 3% 4 3 4 3 4 The following table presents the minimum amounts and ratios for the Corporation’s banks to be categorized as well-capitalized under prompt corrective action. (In thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 2010 2009 Total Capital (to Risk- Weighted Assets): BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Risk- Weighted Assets): BPPR BPNA Tier I Capital (to Average Assets): BPPR BPNA $1,863,505 659,718 10% $1,779,358 798,518 10 10% 10 $1,118,103 395,831 6% $1,067,615 479,111 6 $1,435,082 450,799 5% $1,147,687 531,422 5 6% 6 5% 5 Note 26 – Net (loss) income per common share: The following table sets forth the computation of net (loss) income per common share (“EPS”), basic and diluted, for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. (In thousands, except share information) Net income (loss) from continuing operations Net loss from discontinued operations Preferred stock dividends Deemed dividend on preferred stock[1] Preferred stock discount accretion Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A and B preferred stock for common stock, net of issuance costs Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred stock for trust preferred securities Net (loss) income applicable 2010 2009 2008 $137,401 $(553,947) $(680,468) – (310) (19,972) (39,857) (563,435) (34,815) (191,667) – – – – (4,515) 230,388 485,280 – (482) – – to common stock $(54,576) $97,377 $(1,279,200) Average common shares outstanding Average potential dilutive common shares Average common shares outstanding- assuming dilution Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations Basic and diluted EPS 885,154,040 408,229,498 281,079,201 – – – 885,154,040 408,229,498 281,079,201 $(0.06) – $(0.06) $0.29 (0.05) $0.24 $(2.55) (2.00) $(4.55) [1] Deemed dividend related to the issuance of depositary shares and the conversion of the preferred stock into shares of common stock in the second quarter of 2010. The conversion of contingently convertible perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock into shares of the Corporation’s common stock during the second quarter of 2010 resulted in a non-cash beneficial conversion of $191.7 million, representing the intrinsic value between the conversion rate of $3.00 and the common stock closing price of $3.50 on April 13, 2010, the date the preferred shares were offered. The beneficial conversion was recorded as a deemed dividend to the preferred stockholders reducing retained earnings, with a corresponding offset to surplus (paid in capital), and thus did not affect total stockholders’ equity or the book value of the common stock. However, income the deemed dividend decreased the net applicable to common stock and affected the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2010. Moreover, in computing diluted EPS, dilutive convertible securities that remained outstanding for the period prior to included as average potential actual conversion were not common shares because effect would have been the antidilutive. In computing both basic and diluted EPS, the common shares issued upon actual conversion were included in the weighted average calculation of common shares, after the date of conversion, provided that they remained outstanding. Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options, and restricted stock awards that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per common share. For year 2010, there were 2,471,424 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding (2009 - 2,715,852; 2008 - 3,036,843). has to purchase 20,932,836 shares of outstanding a warrant at common stock, which have December 31, 2010. an antidilutive Additionally, Corporation effect the 160 Note 27 – Other service fees: The following table presents the major categories of other service fees for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. (In thousands) Debit card fees Credit card fees and discounts Insurance fees Processing fees Sale and administration of investment products Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments Other fees December 31, 2010 2009 2008 $100,639 $110,040 $108,274 84,786 49,768 45,055 94,636 50,132 55,005 107,713 50,417 51,731 37,783 34,134 34,373 24,801 34,672 15,086 35,154 25,987 37,668 Total other services fees $377,504 $394,187 $416,163 Note 28 – Employee benefits: Pension and benefit restoration plans Certain employees of BPPR and BPNA are covered by non- contributory defined benefit pension plans. Pension benefits are based on age, years of credited service, and final average compensation. BPPR’s non-contributory, defined benefit retirement plan is currently closed to new hires and to employees who at December 31, 2005 were under 30 years of age or were credited with less than 10 years of benefit service. Effective May 1, 2009, the accrual of the benefits under the BPPR retirement plan were frozen to all participants. Pursuant to the amendment, the retirement plan participants will not receive any additional credit for compensation earned and service performed after April 30, 2009 for purposes of calculating benefits under the retirement plan. The retirement plan’s benefit formula is based on a percentage of average final compensation and years of service. Normal retirement age under the retirement plans is age 65 with 5 years of service. Pension costs are funded in accordance with minimum funding standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Benefits under the BPPR retirement plan are subject to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code limits on compensation and benefits. Benefits under restoration plans restore benefits to selected employees that are limited under the retirement plan due to U.S. Internal Revenue Code limits and a compensation definition that excludes nonqualified arrangements. The freeze applied to the restoration plan as well. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation amended the pension benefits as a result of the EVERTEC sale described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of such amendment, the EVERTEC employees not currently eligible to retire may become eligible for subsidized early retirement benefits provided they reach retirement age while working with the acquirer. pursuant amounts deferred to 161 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Effective April 1, 2007, the Corporation’s U.S.A. non- contributory, defined benefit retirement plan, which covered substantially all salaried employees of BPNA hired before June 30, 2004, was amended to freeze the plan and terminate it as soon as practical thereafter. Participants in this plan were no longer entitled to any further benefit accruals on or after that date. These actions were also applicable to the related plan that restored benefits to select employees that were limited under the retirement plan. During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation settled its U.S. retirement plan, which had been frozen in 2007. The U.S. retirement plan assets were distributed to plan participants during the fourth quarter of 2010. The Corporation’s pension fund investment strategy is to invest in a prudent manner for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants. A well defined internal structure has been established to develop and implement a risk-controlled investment strategy that is targeted to produce a total return that, when combined with the bank’s contributions to the fund, will maintain the fund’s ability to meet all required benefit obligations. Risk is controlled through diversification of asset types, such as investments in domestic and international equities and fixed income. Equity investments include various types of stock and index funds. Also, this category includes Popular, Inc.’s common stock. Fixed income investments include U.S. Government securities and other U.S. agencies’ obligations, corporate bonds, mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and index funds, among others. A designated committee periodically reviews the investments and assets performance of allocation. The Trustee and the money managers are allowed to exercise to limitations investment policies. The established by the pension plans’ into derivative to enter plans transactions, unless approved by the Trustee. forbid money managers investment discretion, the pension plans’ subject The overall expected long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption reflects the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits included in the benefit obligation. The assumption has been determined by reflecting expectations regarding future rates of return for the plan assets, with consideration given to the distribution of the investments by asset class and historical rates of return for each individual asset class. This process is reevaluated at least on an annual basis and if market, actuarial and economic conditions change, adjustments to the rate of return may come into place. The Corporation’s to make annual contributions to the plans, when necessary, in amounts which fully provide for all benefits as they become due under the plans. funding policy is The plans’ target allocation based on market value for 2010 and 2009, by asset category, is summarized in the table below. Equity Fixed / variable income Cash and cash equivalents Allocation range Maximum allotment 0-70% 0-100% 0-100% 70% 100% 100% The following table presents the composition of the assets of the pension and benefit restoration plans. (In thousands) 2010 2009 Investments, at fair value: Allocated share of Master Trust net assets Popular, Inc. common stock Private equity investment Total investments Receivables: Accrued interest and dividends Total receivables Cash and cash equivalents Total assets $455,102 8,622 836 464,560 – – 18 $464,578 $414,775 6,206 884 421,865 55 55 12,212 $434,132 Certain assets of the plans are maintained, for investment purposes only, on a commingled basis with the assets of the Popular Savings Plan in a Master Trust (the “Master Trust”). Neither the pension or benefit restoration plan has any interest in the specific assets of the Master Trust, but maintains beneficial interests in such assets. The Master Trust is managed by the Trust Division of BPPR and by several investment managers. At December 31, 2010, the pension and restoration plans’ interest in the net assets of the Master Trust was approximately 88.4% (2009 - 87.8%). The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the plans’ assets at fair value at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The following table does not include the plans’ interests in the Master Trust because that information is presented in a separate table. (In thousands) Equity securities Private equity investment Cash and cash equivalents Accrued interest and dividends Total assets, excluding interests in Master Trust 2010 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total $8,622 – 18 – $8,640 – – – – – – $836 – – $836 $8,622 836 18 – $6,206 – 12,212 – $9,476 $18,418 – – – – – – $884 – 55 $939 $6,206 884 12,212 55 $19,357 162 Following is a description of the plans’ valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value: k Equity securities - Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market are classified as Level 1. k Private equity investments - Private equity investments include an investment in a private equity fund. This fund value is recorded at the net asset value (NAV) of the fund which is affected by the changes of the fair value of the investments held in the fund. This fund is classified as Level 3. k Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents are reasonable estimates of their fair value since they are available on demand or due to their short-term maturity. k Accrued interest and dividends - Given the short-term nature of these assets, their carrying amount approximates fair value. Since there is a lack of observable inputs related to instrument specific attributes, these are reported as Level 3. The following table presents the changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value. (In thousands) Balance at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets: Change in unrealized gain (loss) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date Actual return on plan assets (gain (loss)) relating to instruments sold during the year Purchases, sales, issuances, settlements, paydowns and maturities (net) Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 Balance at end of year 2010 $939 2009 $1,466 (48) – (55) – $836 (363) – (164) – $939 Master Trust The following table presents the investments held in the Master Trust at December 31, 2010 and 2009, broken down by level within the fair value hierarchy. (In thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 2010 2009 Obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies Corporate bonds and debentures Equity securities Index fund - equity Foreign equity fund Commodity fund Index fund - fixed income Mortgage-backed securities Private equity investments Cash and cash equivalents Accrued investment income Total assets – – $228,054 2,267 – – – – – 25,926 – $256,247 $50,417 47,263 – – 65,491 17,409 2,284 72,959 – – – $255,823 – – – – – – – – $836 – 1,655 $2,491 $50,417 47,263 228,054 2,267 65,491 17,409 2,284 72,959 836 25,926 1,655 $514,561 – – $207,747 5,164 – – – – – 16,440 – $229,351 $25,733 47,792 – – 57,082 16,274 7,868 85,921 – – – $240,670 – – – – – – – – $894 – 1,719 $2,613 $25,733 47,792 207,747 5,164 57,082 16,274 7,868 85,921 894 16,440 1,719 $472,634 The closing prices reported in the active markets in which the securities are traded are used to value the investments in the Master Trust. Following is a description of the Master Trust’s valuation methodologies used for investments measured at fair value: k Obligations of U.S. Government and its agencies - The fair value of Obligations of U.S. Government and agencies obligations is based on an active exchange market and is based on quoted market prices for similar securities. These securities are classified as Level 2. U.S. agency structured notes are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector and for which the fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread in deriving their fair value. These securities are classified as Level 2. k Corporate bonds and debentures - Corporate bonds and debentures are valued at fair value at the closing price reported in the active market in which the bond is traded. These securities are classified as Level 2. k Equity securities - Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market and high liquidity are classified as Level 1. k Index funds - equity - Investments in index funds - equity with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market and high liquidity are classified as Level 1. 163 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT k Index funds - fixed income, foreign equity funds and commodity funds - These investments are valued at the net asset value (NAV) of shares held by the plan at year end. These securities are classified as Level 2. k Mortgage-backed securities - Certain agency mortgage and other asset backed securities (“MBS”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by fair value credit quality and market incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS is classified as Level 2. sector. Their k Private equity investments - Private equity investments include an investment in a private equity fund. The fund value is recorded at its net asset value (NAV) which is affected by the changes in the fair market value of the investments held in the fund. This fund is classified as Level 3. k Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents is a reasonable estimate of the fair value since it is available on demand. k Accrued investment income - Given the short-term nature of these assets, their carrying amount approximates fair value. Since there is a lack of observable inputs related to instrument specific attributes, these are reported as Level 3. The preceding valuation methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent of different with other market methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. participants, the use The following table presents the changes in the Master Trust’s Level 3 assets measured at fair value for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Balance at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets: Change in unrealized gain (loss) relating to instruments still held at the reporting date Actual return on plan assets (gain (loss)) relating to instruments sold during the year Purchases, sales, issuances, settlements, paydowns and maturities (net) Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 Balance at end of year 2010 2009 $2,613 $2,949 (58) – (64) – $2,491 (444) – 108 – $2,613 There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. At December 31, 2010, the pension and restoration plans held 2,745,720 shares (2009 - 2,745,720) of the Corporation’s common stock with a fair value of $8.6 million (2009 - $6.2 million). No dividends were paid during 2010 on shares of the Corporation’s common stock held by the plans (2009 - $275 thousand). The following table sets forth the aggregate status of the plans and the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements 164 at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Curtailment (gain) loss Actuarial loss (gain) Benefits paid Benefit obligations at end of year Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets at end of year Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss: Net loss Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) Reconciliation of net (liability) asset: Net (liability) asset at beginning of year Amount recognized in AOCL at beginning of year, pre-tax (Accrual) prepaid beginning of year Net periodic benefic (cost) income Additional benefit (cost) income Contributions Prepaid (accrual) at end of year Amount recognized in AOCL Net (liability) asset at end of year Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 2010 2009 $557,308 – 31,513 – 58,019 (43,586) $603,254 $413,631 45,932 26,589 (43,586) $442,566 $596,489 3,330 32,672 (40,947) (4,791) (29,445) $557,308 $373,709 60,135 9,232 (29,445) $413,631 $26,396 – 1,537 – 3,235 (867) $30,301 $20,501 2,333 45 (867) $22,012 $176,910 $176,910 $146,935 $146,935 $8,237 $8,237 $(143,677) 146,935 3,258 (9,396) (4,229) 26,589 16,222 (176,910) ($160,688) $(222,780) 241,923 19,143 (24,297) (820) 9,232 3,258 (146,935) ($143,677) $(5,896) 6,119 223 (320) – 45 (52) (8,237) ($8,289) $31,219 340 1,616 (4,349) (1,955) (475) $26,396 $15,916 3,314 1,746 (475) $20,501 $6,119 $6,119 $(15,303) 15,017 (286) (1,577) 340 1,746 223 (6,119) ($5,896) The table below presents a breakdown of the plans’ liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Current liabilities Non-current liabilities Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 – $160,688 $1,740 141,937 2010 $51 8,238 2009 $48 5,848 The following table presents the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), pre-tax, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year Increase (decrease) in AOCL: Recognized during the year: Prior service (cost) credit Actuarial (losses) gains Occurring during the year: Net actuarial losses (gains) Total increase (decrease) in AOCL Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 2010 $146,935 $241,923 $6,119 2009 $15,017 – (12,974) – 42,949 29,975 $176,910 (864) (13,794) – (80,330) (94,988) $146,935 – (397) – 2,515 2,118 $8,237 304 (824) – (8,378) (8,898) $6,119 165 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) during 2011. (In thousands) Net loss Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans $11,320 $591 The following table presents information for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets. (In thousands) Projected benefit obligation Accumulated benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 2010 $603,254 603,254 442,566 $557,308 557,308 413,631 $30,301 30,301 22,012 2009 $26,396 26,396 20,501 The actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for the years ended December 31, were as follows: Discount rate: P.R. Plan U.S. Plan Rate of compensation increase - weighted average: P.R. Plan U.S. Plan 2010 2009 5.30% 5.90% – – – 4.30 – – The following table presents the actuarial assumptions used to determine the components of net periodic pension cost. Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 Discount rate: P.R. Plan U.S. Plan Discount rate at remeasurement Expected return on plan assets Rate of compensation increase - weighted average: P.R. Plan U.S. Plan The following table presents the components of net periodic pension cost. 5.90% 6.10% 6.40% 5.90% 6.10% 6.40% 5.75% – 4.00% 4.52% 6.70% – 6.70% – – – – – 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% – – 4.50% 4.60% – – – – 4.50% 4.60% – – (In thousands) Components of net periodic pension cost: Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior services cost Amortization of net loss Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) Net periodic cost (benefit) Settlement loss (gain) Curtailment loss (gain) Total cost Pension Plans Benefit Restoration Plans 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 – $31,513 (30,862) – – 8,745 9,396 4,229 – $13,625 $3,330 32,672 (25,543) 44 13,794 – 24,297 – 820 $25,117 $9,261 34,444 (40,676) 266 – – 3,295 – – $3,295 – $1,537 (1,614) – – 397 320 – – $320 $340 1,616 (1,239) (9) 869 – 1,577 – (340) $1,237 $729 1,843 (1,680) (53) 686 – 1,525 (24) – $1,501 During 2011, the Corporation expects to contribute $125 million to the pension plans and $2.3 million to the benefit restoration plans. The following table presents benefit payments expected to be paid in future years. (In thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 - 2020 Pension Plans $31,467 32,371 33,301 34,195 35,109 186,579 Benefit Restoration Plans $946 1,119 1,268 1,416 1,663 10,207 Postretirement health care benefits In addition to providing pension benefits, BPPR provides certain health care benefits for certain retired employees. Regular employees of BPPR, hired before February 1, 2000, may become eligible for health care benefits, provided they reach retirement age while working for BPPR. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation amended the postretirement benefits as a result of the EVERTEC sale described in Note 4 to the such consolidated financial amendment, the EVERTEC employees may become eligible for health care benefits provided they reach retirement age while working with the acquirer. statements. As result of a The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement health care benefit plan during 2011. (In thousands) Net prior service cost (credit) Net loss 2011 $(1,046) $ 1,089 166 The following table presents the status of the Corporation’s unfunded postretirement benefit plan at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) 2010 2009 Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of the year Service cost Interest cost Temporary deviation (gain) loss Termination benefit (gain) loss Benefits paid Actuarial loss (gain) $111,628 1,727 6,434 86 671 (5,069) 48,836 $135,943 2,195 8,105 – – (5,031) (29,584) Benefit obligation end of year $164,313 $111,628 Funded status at end of year: Benefit obligation at end of year Fair value of plan assets Funded status at end of year Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss: Net prior service cost Net loss (gain) $(164,313) $(111,628) – – $(164,313) $(111,628) $(1,161) 26,949 $(2,207) (23,061) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) $25,788 $(25,268) Reconciliation of net (liability) asset: Net (liability) asset at beginning of year Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at beginning of year, pre-tax (Accrual) prepaid at beginning of year Additional benefit (cost) income Net periodic benefit (cost) income Contributions (Accrual) prepaid at end of year Amount recognized in accumulated $(111,628) $(135,942) (25,268) 3,269 (136,896) (757) (5,940) 5,068 (132,673) – (9,254) 5,031 (138,525) (136,896) other comprehensive (loss) income (25,788) 25,268 Net liability at end of year $(164,313) $(111,628) The table below presents a breakdown of the post-retirement plan liability. (In thousands) Current liabilities Non-current liabilities 2010 2009 $6,159 158,154 $5,165 106,463 167 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following table presents the change in accumulated other comprehensive income, pre-tax for the postretirement plan. (In thousands) 2010 2009 Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at beginning of year $(25,268) $3,269 Decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income: Recognized during the year: Prior service (cost) credit Actuarial gains (losses) Occurring during the year: Net actuarial losses (gains) Total decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1,046 1,175 1,046 – 48,835 (29,583) 51,056 (28,537) Assumed health care trend rates generally have a significant effect on the amounts reported for a health care plan. The following table presents the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates. (In thousands) Effect on total service cost and interest cost components Effect on postretirement benefit 1-Percentage Point Increase 1-Percentage Point Decrease $480 ($707) obligation $5,597 ($6,476) The Corporation expects to contribute $6.2 million to the postretirement benefit plan in 2011 to fund current benefit payment requirements. The following table presents the timing of expected benefit (income) at end of year $25,788 ($25,268) payments. The weighted average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2010 was 5.30% (2009 - 5.90%). The weighted average discount rate used to determine the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 5.90% (2009 - 6.10%; 2008 - 6.40%). The following table presents the components of net periodic (In thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 - 2020 $ 6,159 6,897 7,786 8,181 8,539 48,750 postretirement benefit cost. (In thousands) Service cost Interest cost Amortization of prior service benefit Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss Net periodic benefit cost Temporary deviation (gain) loss Termination benefit (gain) loss Total net periodic benefit cost 2010 2009 2008 $1,727 6,434 (1,046) (1,175) 5,940 86 671 $6,697 $2,195 8,105 (1,046) – 9,254 – – $9,254 $2,142 8,219 (1,046) – 9,315 – – $9,315 The following table presents the assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31, 2010 and 2009. To determine postretirement benefit obligation: 2010 2009 Initial health care cost trend rates: Initial - Medicare Advantage Plans All other plans Ultimate health care cost trend rate Year that the ultimate trend rate is reached To determine net periodic benefit cost: Initial health care cost trend rate Ultimate health care cost trend rate Year that the ultimate trend rate is reached 25.00% 7.00% 6.50 5.00 2014 7.00 5.00 2014 2010 2009 7.00% 7.50% 5.00 2014 5.00 2014 The Plan provides that the cost will be capped to 3% of the annual health care cost increase affecting only those employees retiring after February 1, 2001. Savings plans The Corporation also provides defined contribution savings plans pursuant to Section 1165(e) of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code and Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, as applicable, for substantially all the employees of the Corporation. Investments in the plans are participant-directed, and employer matching contributions are determined based on the specific provisions of each plan. Employees are fully vested in the employer’s contribution after five years of service. Effective March 20, 2009, the savings plans were amended to suspend the employer matching contribution to the plan. The Corporation did not incur costs associated to the matching contributions during (2009 - ended December year $2.9 million; 2008 - $18.8 million). 2010 the 31, The plans held 20,164,151 (2009 - 22,239,167; 2008 - 17,254,175) shares of common stock of the Corporation with a market value of approximately $63.3 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $50.3 million; 2008 - $89.0 million). Note 29- Stock-based compensation The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which permitted the granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original terms of the grants 168 made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan. Stock Option Plan Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.’s common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional 20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of employment due to retirement. The following table presents information on stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010. (Not in thousands) Exercise Price Range per Share Options Outstanding $14.39 - $18.50 $19.25 - $27.20 $14.39 - $27.20 1,102,614 1,172,552 2,275,166 Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Options Outstanding $15.85 $25.21 $20.67 Weighted-Average Remaining Life of Options Outstanding in Years 1.74 3.49 2.64 Options Exercisable (fully vested) 1,102,614 1,172,552 2,275,166 Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Options Exercisable $15.85 $25.21 $20.67 There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $0.2 million; 2008 - $1.6 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Options Outstanding Weighted-Average Exercise Price (Not in thousands) Outstanding at January 1, 2008 Granted Exercised Forfeited Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2008 Granted Exercised Forfeited Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2009 Granted Exercised Forfeited Expired Outstanding at 3,092,192 – – (40,842) (85,507) 2,965,843 – – (59,631) (353,549) 2,552,663 – – – (277,497) $20.64 – – 26.29 19.67 $20.59 – – 26.42 19.25 $20.64 – – – 20.43 $20.67 December 31, 2010 2,275,166 The stock options exercisable at December 31, 2010 totaled 2,275,166 (2009 - 2,466,276; 2008 - 2,653,114). There were no stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during 2010, 2009 and 2008. There was no stock option expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2009 - $0.2 million, with a tax benefit of $92 thousand; 2008 - $1.1 million, with a tax benefit of $0.4 million). Incentive Plan The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards, Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be from common stock purchased by the made Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such shares in the open market to cover each grant. as determined by the Board). Employees available the Corporation has issued Under the Incentive Plan, restricted shares, which become vested based on the employees’ continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age a cycle. during three-year performance goals The compensation cost associated with the performance shares is recorded ratably over a three-year performance period. The performance shares are granted at the end of the three-year period and vest at grant date, except when the participant’s employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause. In such case, the participant would receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as if the Corporation would have met the performance At December 31, 2010, 42,859 shares have been granted under this plan (2009- 35,397; 2008 - 7,106). performance period. goal the for income During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $1.0 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.4 million (2009 - $1.5 million, with a tax benefit of $0.6 million; 2008 - $2.2 million, with a tax benefit of $0.9 million). The fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $3.2 million at grant date and $0.9 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall, net of windfalls, of $2.3 million that was recorded as an additional income tax expense at the applicable income tax rate. No the tax expense was additional U.S. employees due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.5 million of performance share tax benefit of $0.2 million (2009 - expense, with a $0.6 million, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million; 2008 - $0.9 million, with a tax benefit of $0.4 million). The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management at December 31, 2010 was $2.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. recorded for 169 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT and 10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of management for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. (Not in thousands) Non-vested at January 1, 2008 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2008 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2009 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2010 Restricted Stock 303,686 – (50,648) (4,699) 248,339 – (104,791) (5,036) 138,512 1,525,416 (340,879) (191,313) 1,131,736 Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value $22.37 – 20.33 19.95 $22.83 – 21.93 19.95 $23.62 2.70 7.87 3.24 $3.61 to manage 2009 and States critical liquidity its United initiatives capitalization, operations, During the year ended December 31, 2010, 1,525,416 shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which 1,305,035 shares of restricted stock were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule. The shares of restricted stock, which were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule, were determined upon consideration of management’s execution of the strategically Corporation’s reposition improve management effectiveness and cost control. The shares will vest on the secondary anniversary of the grant date, and they may become transferrable in 25% increments as the Corporation repays each 25% portion of the aggregate financial assistance received under the United States Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. In addition, the grants are also subject to further performance achieve the Corporation must profitability for at least one fiscal year for awards to be payable. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, no shares of awarded to management under the Incentive Plan. restricted stock were criteria and as Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share awards consist of the opportunity to receive shares of Popular Inc.’s common stock provided that the Corporation achieves certain performance The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. (Not in thousands) Non-vested at January 1, 2008 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2008 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2009 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2010 Restricted Stock – 56,025 (56,025) – – 270,515 (270,515) – – 305,898 (305,898) – – Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value – $10.75 10.75 – – $2.62 2.62 – – $2.95 2.95 – – During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation granted 305,898 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became vested at grant date (2009 - 270,515; 2008 - 56,025). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.5 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million (2009 - $0.5 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million; 2008 - $0.5 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2010 for directors was $0.9 million. 170 Note 30 - Rental expense and commitments: At December 31, 2010, the Corporation was obligated under a number of non-cancelable leases for land, buildings, and equipment which require rentals (net of related sublease rentals) as follows: (In thousands) Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Later years Minimum payments $39,591 38,131 36,593 34,518 31,932 203,569 Sublease rentals $1,275 1,460 1,606 1,543 1,392 707 Net $38,316 36,671 34,987 32,975 30,540 202,862 $384,334 $7,983 $376,351 Total rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $60.7 million (2009 - $65.6 million; 2008 - $79.5 million), which is and communication expenses, according to their nature. included in net occupancy, equipment Note 31 - Income taxes: The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the continuing operations for the years ended December 31, are summarized in the following table. (In thousands) Current income tax expense: Puerto Rico Federal and States Subtotal Deferred income tax (benefit) expense: Puerto Rico Federal and States Valuation allowance - initial recognition Subtotal Total income tax (benefit) expense 2010 2009 2008 $119,729 628 $75,368 3,012 $91,609 5,106 120,357 78,380 96,715 (510) (11,617) (67,098) (19,584) (70,403) 2,507 – – 432,715 (12,127) (86,682) 364,819 $108,230 ($8,302) $461,534 171 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The reasons for the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico, were as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Computed income tax at statutory rates Benefits of net tax-exempt interest income Effect of income subject to capital gain tax rate Deferred tax asset valuation allowance Non deductible expenses Adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions States taxes and other Income tax (benefit) expense 2010 % of pre-tax loss 41% (3) (59) 59 11 – 6 (11) 44% Amount $100,586 (7,799) (143,844) 143,754 28,130 – 13,908 (26,505) $108,230 Amount ($230,241) (50,261) (1,842) 282,933 – (12,351) 40,625 (37,165) ($8,302) 2009 % of pre-tax income 41% 9 – (50) – 2 (7) 6 1% 2008 Amount ($85,384) (62,600) (17,905) 643,011 – – 16,398 (31,986) % of pre-tax income 39% 29 8 (294) – – (8) 15 $461,534 (211%) Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their tax bases. Significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were as follows: (In thousands) 2010 2009 aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax- paying subsidiaries of the Corporation. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation had total tax credits of $5.8 million that will reduce the regular income tax liability in future years expiring in annual installments through the year 2015. Deferred tax assets: Tax credits available for carryforward Net operating loss and donation carryforward available Postretirement and pension benefits Deferred loan origination fees Allowance for loan losses Deferred gains Accelerated depreciation Intercompany deferred gains Other temporary differences Total gross deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities: Differences between the assigned values and the tax bases of assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations Difference in outside basis between financial and tax reporting on sale of a business FDIC-assisted transaction Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities Deferred loan origination costs Other temporary differences Total gross deferred tax liabilities Valuation allowance Net deferred tax asset $ 5,833 $ 11,026 1,222,717 131,508 8,322 393,289 13,056 7,108 5,480 26,063 1,813,376 843,968 103,979 7,880 536,277 14,040 2,418 7,015 39,096 1,565,699 31,846 25,896 11,120 64,049 52,186 6,911 1,392 167,504 1,268,589 $ 377,283 – – 30,323 9,708 5,923 71,850 1,129,882 $ 363,967 The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at December 31, 2010 is reflected in the consolidated statements of condition as $388 million in net deferred tax assets (in the “other assets” caption) (2009 - $364 million in deferred tax asset in the “other assets” caption) and $11 million in deferred tax reflecting the liabilities in the “other liabilities” caption, The deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss at outstanding donations carryforwards December 31, 2010 expires as follows: (“NOLs”) and (In thousands) 2013 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2027 2028 2029 2030 $ 1,447 246 7,552 9,755 16,994 299 134,407 76 971 1,248 77,217 513,933 187,614 270,958 $1,222,717 A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant negative evidence and has caused management to conclude that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize the associated deferred tax assets in the future. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded a valuation allowance of approximately $1.3 billion on the deferred tax assets of its U.S. operations. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $398 million. The Corporation assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of the net deferred tax asset based on the weighting of all available evidence. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. This situation is mainly due to the performance of the construction loan portfolio, including the portfolio. the charges related to the proposed sale of Currently, a significant portion of the construction loan portfolio has been written-down to fair value based on a bid received. The Corporation’s banking operations in Puerto Rico have a very strong earnings history, and it is management’s view, based on that history, that the event causing this loss is not a continuing condition of the operations. Accordingly, there is enough positive evidence to outweigh the negative evidence of the cumulative loss. Based on this evidence, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset will be realized. Management reassesses the realization of the deferred tax assets each reporting period. Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Code provides a dividends-received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations. The Corporation’s federal income tax (benefit) provision for 2010 was ($8.9) million (2009 - ($12.9) million; 2008 - $436.9 million). The intercompany settlement of taxes paid is based on tax sharing agreements which generally allocate taxes to each entity based on a separate return basis. 172 The following table presents a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits. (In millions) Balance at January 1, 2009 Additions for tax positions related to 2009 Reductions for tax positions of prior years Reductions by lapse of statute of limitations Balance at December 31, 2009 Additions for tax positions related to 2010 Additions for tax positions taken in prior years Reductions for tax positions of prior years Reduction as a result of settlements Reduction by lapse of statute of limitations Balance at December 31, 2010 $ 40.5 3.7 (0.6) (1.8) $ 41.8 4.4 3.5 (4.2) (14.3) (4.9) $ 26.3 At December 31, 2010, the related accrued interest approximated $6.1 million (2009 - $7.2 million). The interest expense recognized during 2010 was $0.9 million (2009 - $2.5 million). Management determined that, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, there was no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to report interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, while the penalties, if any, are reported in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. After consideration of the effect on U.S. tax of federal the total amount of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico that, if recognized, would affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate, was approximately $31.6 million at December 31, 2010 (2009 - $47.1 million). The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statute of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity, and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. the following years remain subject The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. At December 31, 2010, to examination: jurisdiction - 2008 through 2010 and Puerto U.S. Federal Rico - 2006 through 2010. During 2010, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed the examination of the Corporation’s U.S. operations tax returns for 2007. As a result of examinations, the Corporation reduced the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits by $14.3 million. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $12 million. 173 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Note 32 - Derivative instruments and hedging activities: The following discussion and tables provide a description of the derivative instruments used as part of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management strategies. The use of derivatives is incorporated as part of the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that are caused by is to manage interest rate volatility. The Corporation’s goal interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that the net interest income is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in interest rates. The Corporation uses to facilitate customer derivatives transactions, to take proprietary positions and as means of risk management. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed and variable interest rate assets and liabilities will this appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of unrealized appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporation’s gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. As a matter of policy, the Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments for interest rate risk management. in its trading activities The use of derivative instruments creates exposure to credit and market risk. If a counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, the Corporation’s credit risk will equal the fair value of the derivative asset. Generally, when the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes the Corporation, thus creating a repayment risk for the Corporation. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. The derivative a $4.8 million negative adjustment as a result of the credit risk of the counterparties at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 - $5.1 million negative adjustment). On the other hand, when the fair value include assets of a derivative contract is negative, the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, the fair value of derivatives liabilities incorporates nonperformance risk or the risk that the obligation include a will not be fulfilled. The derivative liabilities $1.6 million positive adjustment related to the incorporation of the Corporation’s own credit risk at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 - $2.1 million positive adjustment). Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or implied volatility rates might have on the value of a financial instrument. The Corporation manages the market risk associated with interest rates and, to a limited extent, with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by establishing and monitoring limits for the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken. The Corporation regularly measures this risk by using static gap analysis, simulations and duration analysis. Pursuant to the Corporation’s accounting policy, the fair value of derivatives is not offset with the amounts for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral. At December 31, 2010, the amount recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral under master netting agreements was $86 million and the amount recognized for the obligation to return cash collateral was $3 million (December 31, 2009 - $88 million and $4 million, respectively). covenants tied to the Certain of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial corresponding banking subsidiary’s well-capitalized status and credit rating. These agreements could require additional collateralization, early termination or both. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with contingent features that were in a liability position at December 31, 2010 was $67 million (December 31, 2009 - $66 million). Based on the contractual obligations established on these derivative instruments, the Corporation has fully collateralized these positions by pledging collateral of $86 million at December 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 - $88 million). Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges or non-hedging derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows: 174 Notional Amount Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities At December 31, 2010 2009 Statement of Condition Classification Fair Value at December 31, 2010 2009 Statement of Condition Classification Fair Value at December 31, 2010 2009 $256,480 $120,800 Other assets $1,774 $1,346 Other liabilities $839 hedging instruments $256,480 $120,800 $1,774 $1,346 $839 $278,052 $165,300 Trading account securities $483 $1,253 Other liabilities $1,736 $79 820,590 1,006,154 Other assets 62,175 63,120 Other liabilities – 131 820,590 1,006,154 Other assets 131 Other liabilities 66,685 67,358 – – rate commitments with clients 411 – – – Other liabilities (In thousands) Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Forward commitments Total derivatives designated as Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: Forward contracts Interest rate swaps associated with: - swaps with corporate clients - swaps offsetting position of corporate clients’ swaps Foreign currency and exchange Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments with counterparties Interest rate caps and floors Interest rate caps and floors for the benefit of corporate clients Indexed options on deposits Bifurcated embedded options Total derivatives not designated Other assets Other assets 7 240 – 249 – – 408 89,638 89,638 76,984 – 139,859 139,859 110,900 – Other assets – 8,314 6,976 – Other liabilities – Interest bearing deposits – 72,921 84,316 – $22 $22 4 – – – – – 240 – 249 – 6,840 5,402 as hedging instruments $2,249,232 $2,652,542 $71,219 $71,729 $75,505 $73,219 Total derivative assets and liabilities $2,505,712 $2,773,342 $72,993 $73,075 $76,344 $73,241 Cash Flow Hedges The Corporation utilizes forward contracts to hedge the sale of mortgage-backed securities with duration terms over one month. Interest rate forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery of securities, which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date at a specified price or yield. These forward contracts are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) corresponding to these forward contracts is expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months. These contracts have a maximum remaining maturity of 89 days at December 31, 2010. For cash flow hedges, gains and losses on derivative contracts that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to current period earnings are included in the line item in which the hedged item is recorded and during the period in which the forecasted transaction impacts earnings, as presented in the table below. 175 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT (In thousands) Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) Forward commitments Total cash flow hedges ($1,228) ($1,228) OCI - “Other Comprehensive Income” AOCI - “Accumulated Other comprehensive Income” Year ended December 31, 2010 Classification in the Statement of Operations of the Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Trading account profit Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing ) Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) ($964) ($964) – – – – Year ended December 31, 2009 Classification in the Statement of Operations of the Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Trading account profit Interest expense Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) ($1,419) – ($1,419) Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing ) Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) ($4,535) (2,380) ($6,915) Trading account profit – $125 – $125 (In thousands) Forward commitments Interest rate swaps Total cash flow hedges Fair Value Hedges At December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no derivatives designated as fair value hedges. Non-Hedging Activities For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation recognized a loss of $15.0 million (December 31, 2009 - loss of $19.5 million) related to its non-hedging derivatives, as detailed in the table below. (In thousands) Forward contracts Interest rate swap contracts Credit derivatives Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments Foreign currency and exchange rate commitments Indexed options Bifurcated embedded options Total Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives Year Ended December 31, 2010 Year Ended December 31, 2009 Trading account profit ($15,791) Other operating income Other operating income Interest expense Other operating income Interest expense Interest expense (910) – 3 10 1,247 408 ($15,033) ($12,485) (6,468) (2,599) (4) 25 1,209 788 ($19,534) Forward Contracts The Corporation has forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities with terms lasting less than a month, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. Changes in their fair value are recognized in trading account profit (loss). Interest Rates Swaps and Foreign Currency and Exchange Rate Commitments In addition to using derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Corporation also utilizes derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts, in its capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers. The Corporation minimizes its market risk and credit risk by taking offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions with credit limit approvals and monitoring procedures. Market value changes on these swaps and other derivatives are recognized in earnings in the period of change. Interest Rate Caps and Floors The Corporation enters into interest rate caps and floors as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and simultaneously takes offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions, thus minimizing its market and credit risks. Note 33 - Guarantees: The Corporation has obligations upon the occurrence of certain events under financial guarantees provided in certain contractual agreements as summarized below. the contract, then, upon their request, The Corporation issues financial standby letters of credit and has risk participation in standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions, in each case to guarantee the performance of various customers to third parties. If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the the terms of Corporation would be obligated to make the payment to the guaranteed party. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.5 million (2009 - $0.7 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit issued or modified after December 31, 2002. In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 460, the Corporation recognizes at fair value the obligation at inception of the standby letters of credit. The fair value approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are deferred and are recognized over the commitment period. The contract amounts in standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, shown in Note 34, represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the customers. These standby letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire without being drawn upon. The Corporation’s standby letters of credit are generally secured, and in the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral provided, which normally includes cash and marketable securities, real estate, receivables and others. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments. Also, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell, in bulk sale transactions, residential mortgage loans and SBA commercial loans subject to credit recourse or to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and 176 relate, example, warranties may borrower for creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties. to if 2010, Freddie Mac applicable. During residential mortgage At December 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.0 billion (2009 - $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, the Corporation repurchased approximately $121 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (2009 - $47 million). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $54 million (2009 - $16 million). The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses from these credit recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of year Provision for recourse liability Net charge-offs Balance as of end of year 2010 2009 $15,584 53,979 (15,834) $14,133 1,482 (31) $53,729 $15,584 The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “gain (loss) on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the 177 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the twelve-month period. following Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value rates, loan aging, among others. the loans characteristics When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding sold. The of the in Puerto Rico group Corporation’s mortgage operations conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty arrangements is not significant. Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA, and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced $18.4 billion (2009 - $17.7 billion) in mortgage loans, including the loans recourse. The Corporation generally serviced with credit recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At December 31, 2010, the amount of funds advanced by the Corporation under such servicing agreements was (2009 - $14 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the approximately $24 million servicing Corporation’s increased portfolio delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts. experience the generally investors, assumed by At December 31, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans had been sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was the Corporation is required to make certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $31 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition (2009 - $33 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected losses associated to E-LOAN’s customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loan’s funding date and the loan loan data. repurchase date, as observed in the historical During 2010, E-LOAN charged-off approximately $21 million (2009 - $14 million) against this representation and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases and indemnification or make-whole events. Make-whole events are typically defaulted cases in which the investor attempts to recover by collateral or guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered portion of been the predominantly for first mortgage agency loans and principally consist of underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing documentation. The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by E-Loan, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: loan. Claims have (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of year Provision for representations and warranties Net charge-offs / termination Balance as of end of year 2010 2009 $33,294 18,594 (21,229) $5,713 41,377 (13,796) $30,659 $33,294 During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. The sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. At the liabilities included as other agreements primarily December 31, 2010, include indemnification for breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding at December 31, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation’s reserve related to PFH’s indemnity arrangements amounted to $8 million (2009 - $9 million), and is in the the consolidated statement of Corporation recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFH’s representation and warranty arrangements amounting to approximately $2 million (2009 - $3 million). The reserve at December 31, 2010 contemplates historical balance indemnity payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligation for defaulted loans within a short-term timeframe, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations. The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated to loans sold by the discontinued operations of PFH, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: condition. During 2010, (In thousands) Balance as of beginning of period Provision for representations and warranties Net charge-offs / termination Balance as of end of period 2010 2009 $9,405 911 (2,258) $15,371 (3,633) (2,333) $8,058 $9,405 During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation sold a lease portfolio of approximately $0.3 billion. At December 31, 2010, the reserve established to provide for any losses on the breach of certain representations and warranties included in the associated sale agreements amounted to $0.9 million (2009 - $6 million). This reserve is included as liabilities in the consolidated statement of part of other condition. During 2010, the Corporation recorded charge-offs of approximately $0.6 million related to these representation and warranty arrangements (2009 - $1 million). guarantees Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and Popular, unconditionally certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.6 billion at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. In addition, at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 23 to 178 the consolidated financial statements for information on these trust entities. Note 34 - Commitments and Contingencies: Off-balance sheet risk The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off- balance sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of condition. The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of condition. Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk at December 31, whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk were as follows: (In thousands) 2010 2009 Commitments to extend credit: Credit card lines Commercial lines of credit Other unused credit commitments Commercial letters of credit Standby letters of credit Commitments to originate mortgage loans $3,583,430 1,920,056 375,565 12,532 140,064 $3,787,587 2,826,762 398,799 13,366 134,281 47,493 47,941 Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit Contractual commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend money to customers for a specified period of time. To extend credit, the Corporation evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include cash, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and investment securities, among others. Since many of the loan commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. There are two principal types of letters of credit: commercial and standby letters of credit. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In general, commercial letters of credit are short-term instruments used to finance a commercial contract for the shipment of goods from a seller to a buyer. This type of letter of credit ensures prompt payment to the seller in accordance with 179 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT the terms of the contract. Although the commercial letter of credit is contingent upon the satisfaction of specified conditions, it represents a credit exposure if the buyer defaults on the underlying transaction. Standby letters of credit are issued by the Corporation to disburse funds to a third party beneficiary if the Corporation’s customer fails to perform under the terms of an agreement with the beneficiary. These letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire without being drawn upon. At December 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $21 million for potential losses associated with related to commercial and unfunded loan commitments including consumer $6 million of the contingent the unamortized balance of liability on unfunded loan commitments recorded with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. (2009 - $15 million), lines of credit Other commitments At December 31, 2010, the Corporation also maintained other non-credit commitments for $10 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments (2009 - $10 million). Business concentration are currently Since the Corporation’s business activities concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and the commercial real estate markets. The concentration of Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 39 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report. The Corporation’s loan portfolio is diversified by loan category. However, approximately $12.0 billion, or 58% of the Corporation’s loan portfolio not covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements at December 31, 2010, consisted of real including residential mortgage loans, estate-related loans, construction loans by and commercial real estate. commercial secured loans Except for the Corporation’s exposure to the Puerto Rico Government sector, no individual or single group of related accounts is considered material in relation to our total assets in relation to our overall business. At or deposits, or the Corporation had approximately December 31, 2010, $1.4 billion of credit facilities granted to or guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government, and public corporations, of which $199 million were uncommitted lines of credit. Of the total credit facilities granted, $1.1 billion was outstanding at December 31, 2010, the Corporation had $145 million in the Puerto Rico obligations 2010. Furthermore, its municipalities guaranteed by at December issued or 31, Government, its municipalities and public corporations as part of its investment securities portfolio. Other contingencies As indicated in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The true up-payment was estimated at $169 million and is considered as part of the carrying value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset at December 31, 2010. Legal Proceedings Popular and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are in very early stages and management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. the consolidated cases of Walsh v. Popular, Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., and certain of its directors and officers, among others. The five class actions were consolidated into two separate actions: a securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. Inc., et al.) and an (consolidated with Otero v. Popular, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action entitled In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of Inc., et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.). On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among others. The consolidated action purported to be on behalf of purchasers of Popular’s securities between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleged that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The consolidated action violated Section 11, the defendants also alleged that Section 12(a)(2) and Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose facts necessary to make statements made by the material Corporation not false and misleading in connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities class action complaint sought class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, fees. On January 11, 2010, including counsel Popular, the underwriter defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Popular’s directors on statute of limitations grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing. The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder), Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that plaintiffs had adequately alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements with the requisite state of mind. things, On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The consolidated complaint purported to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc. U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409 and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees, each of whom was alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleged that defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other failing to eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint sought to recover alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive trust, along with costs and attorneys’ fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual the consolidated class action complaint or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19, 2010, Popular filed objections to and recommendation. On the magistrate September 30, 2010, issued an order without opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and providing that the Court would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. No opinion was, however, issued prior to the settlement in principle discussed below. filed a motion to dismiss report the Court defendants judge’s 180 The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) were brought purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers and directors and alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints sought a judgment that the action was a proper derivative action, an award of damages, restitution, costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On November 20, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a scheduling conference held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff their respective and García matters pending resolution of motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss the Garcia action. The Court dismissed the gross mismanagement and corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim. The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan, was removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance and to stay defendants’ consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand proceedings. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order without opinion remanding the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. On October 13, 2010, the Court issued a Statement of Reasons In Support of Remand Order. On October 28, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved for reconsideration of the remand order. The court denied Popular’s request for reconsideration shortly thereafter. On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending derivative action. The Court held that plaintiff had not propounded a “proper purpose” under Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, plaintiff in that action moved for reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied plaintiff’s request for reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the appeal. On June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010, plaintiff moved for reconsideration of 181 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT the Court’s dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiff’s request for reconsideration. At the Court’s request, the parties to the Hoff and García cases discussed the prospect of mediation and agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases could be settled. On January 18-19, 2011, the parties to the Hoff and García cases engaged in nonbinding mediation before the Honorable Nicholas Politan. As a result of the mediation, the Corporation and the other named defendants to the Hoff matter entered into a memorandum of understanding to settle this matter. Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, the amount of $37.5 million will be paid by or on behalf of defendants (of which management expects approximately $30 million will be covered by insurance). The parties intend to file a stipulation of settlement and a joint motion for preliminary approval within 45 days of the execution of the memorandum of understanding. The Corporation’s recognized a charge, net of the amount expected to be covered by insurance, of $7.5 million in December 2010 to cover the uninsured portion of the settlement. The García and Diaz actions were not included in the settlements. However, since these are derivative actions, the Corporation does not expect to be liable for the payment of any monetary award, other than the possible payment of the plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees. In addition, the Corporation is aware that a suit asserting similar claims on behalf of certain individual shareholders under the federal securities laws was filed on January 18, 2011. Prior to the Hoff and derivative action mediation, the parties to the ERISA class action, entered into a separate memorandum of understanding to settle that action. Under the terms of the ERISA memorandum of understanding, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, the amount of $8.2 million will the defendants (all of which be paid by or on behalf of management expects will be covered by insurance). The parties intend to file a joint request to approve the settlement by approximately the middle of April 2011. Popular does not expect to record any material gain or loss as a result of the settlements. Popular has made no admission of liability in connection with either settlement. At this point, the settlement agreements are not final and are subject to a number of future events, including approval of the settlements by the relevant courts. There can be no assurances that the settlements will be finalized or as to the timing of the payments described above. On October 7, 2010, a putative class action for breach of contract and damages captioned Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The (a) complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has suffered damages because of Banco Popular’s allegedly fraudulent overdraft fee practices in connection with debit card transactions. Such the reorganization of practices allegedly consist of: electronic debit transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number of overdraft fees assessed on its customers; (b) the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure to disclose, or to adequately disclose, its overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false and fraudulent information regarding its clients’ account balances at point of sale transactions and on its website. Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies against Banco Popular for breach of contract, abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment. The Corporation intends to vigorously contend these claims. On December 13, 2010, Popular was served with a class action complaint captioned García Lamadrid, et al. v. Banco Popular, et al. which was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. The complaint generally seeks damages against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, other defendants and their respective insurance companies for their alleged breach of certain fiduciary duties, breach of contract, and alleged violations of local tort law. Plaintiffs seek in excess of $600 million in damages, plus costs and attorneys fees. More specifically, plaintiffs - Guillermo García Lamadrid and Benito del Cueto Figueras - are suing Defendant BPPR for the losses they (and others) experienced through their investment in the RG Financial Corporation-backed Conservation Trust Fund securities. Plaintiffs essentially claim that Banco Popular allegedly breached its fiduciary duties to them by failing to keep all relevant parties informed of any developments that that could the Conservation Trust notes or could affect become trust relevant agreements; and that it acted imprudently, in so doing, unreasonably and grossly negligently. Popular must answer or otherwise plead by February 28, 2011. an event of default under the At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate resolution of the Almeyda-Santiago and García Lamadrid cases, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations. residential mortgage loans Note 35 - Non-consolidated variable interest entities: The Corporation transfers in guaranteed loan securitizations. The Corporation’s continuing involvement in these transfers includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed retained, are classified in the securities, to the extent Corporation’s available-for-sale or trading securities. consolidated statement of condition as in guaranteed mortgage The Corporation is involved with various special purpose securitization entities mainly transactions. These special purpose entities are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) since they lack equity investments at risk. As part of the adoption of ASU 2009-17, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation evaluated these guaranteed mortgage securitization structures in which it participates, including GNMA and FNMA, and concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, are not required to be consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements. The Corporation qualitatively assessed whether it held a controlling financial interest in these VIEs, which included analyzing if it had both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA) control the design of their respective VIEs, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at will, and remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the obligation to absorb losses that could be to the VIE. The conclusion on the potentially significant securitization assessment of guaranteed mortgage these the year ended transactions has not change throughout December 31, 2010. The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities’ investors 182 and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies. The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at December 31, 2010 and 2009. (In thousands) Assets Servicing assets: Mortgage servicing rights Total servicing assets Other assets: Servicing advances Total other assets Total Maximum exposure to loss 2010 2009 $107,313 $104,984 $107,313 $104,984 $2,706 $2,706 $2,043 $2,043 $110,019 $107,027 $110,019 $107,027 The size of in which the the non-consolidated VIEs, Corporation has a variable interest in the form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to $9.3 billion at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent and that the value of the Corporation’s interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at December 31, 2010 and 2009 will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies. 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements Note 36 - Fair value measurement: and ASC Subtopic Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows: k Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. k Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities 183 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. k Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs the Corporation’s own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. reflect The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs internally- developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include the amounts Corporation’s credit standing, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently. counterparty quality, reflect credit that The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for in the underlying certain financial assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results. instruments. Changes Fair Value on a Recurring Basis The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010 and 2009: (In millions) Assets Continuing Operations Investment securities available-for-sale: U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Mortgage-backed securities Equity securities Other Total investment securities available-for-sale Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations Residential mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies Other Total trading account securities Mortgage servicing rights Derivatives Total Liabilities Continuing Operations Derivatives Trading liabilities Equity appreciation instrument Total At December 31, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2010 – – – – – – $4 – $4 – – – – – – – $38 1,211 53 1,238 85 2,568 6 26 $5,225 $16 1 473 30 $520 – $73 $4 $5,818 – – – – ($76) (11) (10) ($97) – – – – – $8 – – $8 – $3 20 3 $26 $167 – $201 – – – – $38 1,211 53 1,238 85 2,576 10 26 $5,237 $16 4 493 33 $546 $167 $73 $6,023 ($76) (11) (10) ($97) (In millions) Assets Continuing Operations Investment securities available-for-sale: U.S. Treasury securities Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label Mortgage-backed securities Equity securities Total investment securities available-for-sale Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions Collateralized mortgage obligations Residential mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies Other Total trading account securities Mortgage servicing rights Derivatives Total Liabilities Continuing Operations Derivatives Total At December 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 184 Balance at December 31, 2009 – – – – – – $3 $3 – – – – – – – $30 1,648 81 1,600 118 3,176 5 $6,658 $13 1 208 9 $231 – $73 $3 $6,962 – – – – – $34 – $34 – $3 224 3 $230 $170 – $434 $30 1,648 81 1,600 118 3,210 8 $6,695 $13 4 432 12 $461 $170 73 $7,399 – – ($73) ($73) – – ($73) ($73) 185 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Year ended December 31, 2010 Balance at January 1, 2010 Gains (losses) included in earnings/OCI Purchases sales, issuances, settlements, and paydowns (net) Transfers in (out) of Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2010 $34 $34 $3 224 3 $230 $170 $434 $1 $1 – $3 – $3 ($23) ($19) – – – ($37) – ($37) $20 ($17) ($27) ($27) – ($170) – ($170) – ($197) $8 $8 $3 20 3 $26 $167 $201 (In millions) Assets Continuing Operations Investment securities available-for-sale: Mortgage-backed securities Total investment securities available-for-sale: Trading account securities: Collateralized mortgage obligations Residential mortgage- backed securities - federal agencies Other Total trading account securities Mortgage servicing rights Total [a] Gains are included in OCI [b] Gains (losses) are included in “Trading account profit” in the statement of operations [c] Gains (losses) are included in “Other service fees” in the statement of operations Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings/OCI related to assets still held at December 31, 2010 – –[a] – – – –[b] ($17)[c] ($17) Year ended December 31, 2009 Purchases sales, issuances, settlements and paydowns (net) Increase (decrease) in accrued interest receivable Balance at December 31, 2009 Balance at January 1, 2009 Gain (losses) included in earnings/OCI 186 Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings related to assets still held at December 31, 2009 $37 $37 $3 292 5 $300 $176 $5 $518 – – – $3 (1) $2 ($31) $1 ($28) – – – – – – – – – $(3) $(3) – ($71) (1) ($72) $25 ($6) ($56) $34 $34 $3 224 3 $230 $170 – $434 – – [a] – $6 – $6 [b] ($18) [c] – [d] ($12) (In millions) Assets Continuing Operations Investment securities available-for-sale: Mortgage-backed securities Total investment securities available-for-sale: Trading account securities: Collateralized mortgage obligations Residential mortgage backed securities - federal agencies Other Total trading account securities Mortgage servicing rights Discontinued Operations Loans measured at fair value pursuant to fair value option Total [a] Gains are included in OCI [b] Gain (losses) are included in “Trading account profit” in the statement of operations [c] Gains (losses) are included in “Other service fees” in the statement of operations [d] Gains (losses) are included in “Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the statement of operations During the year ended December 31, 2010, there were $197 million in transfers out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These transfers resulted from certain exempt FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which were transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 2, as a result of a change to a valuation methodology with less unobservable inputs, from an internally- developed pricing matrix to pricing them based on a bond’s theoretical value for similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. Pursuant to the Corporation’s policy, these transfers were recognized as of the reporting period. There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 1 during the year ended December 31, 2010. the end of There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2009. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2009. 187 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows: Year ended December 31, 2010 Year ended December 31, 2009 Total gains (losses) included in earnings/OCI Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at reporting date Total gains (losses) included in earnings/OCI Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at reporting date $1 (23) 3 – ($19) – ($17) – – ($17) – ($31) 2 1 ($28) – ($18) 6 – ($12) (In millions) Continuing Operations OCI Other service fees Trading account profit Discontinued Operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Total Additionally, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves under ASC Section 310-10-35 “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, or write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and to a assets subject that were non-financial fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and which were still included in the consolidated statement of condition as of such dates. The amounts value measurements of those assets as of the end of the reporting period. aggregate represent disclosed fair the (In millions) Continuing Operations Loans[1] Loans held-for-sale [2] Other real estate owned [3] Total Carrying value at December 31, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total – – – – – – – – $204 671 45 $920 $204 671 45 $920 [1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. [2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. [3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate owned that were measured at fair value. (In millions) Continuing Operations Loans [1] Other real estate owned [2] Other foreclosed assets [2] Total Carrying value at December 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total – – – – – – – – $877 60 5 $942 $877 60 5 $942 [1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. [2] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value. Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of underlying value of the Corporation. the 188 prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly liquid markets, these securities are classified as Level 2. The important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based on a relevant dividend yield taking In into consideration the aforementioned variables. the price. addition, demand and supply also affect Corporate securities that trade less frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. Mortgage servicing rights Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayments assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3. Derivatives Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives are classified as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available public data or internally- developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability of default. Equity appreciation instrument Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the terms of the equity appreciation instrument. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated by determining a call option value using the Black- Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal variables in determining appreciation instrument include the implied volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporation’s common stock, the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2. value of equity fair the the Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale k U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are classified as Level 2. k Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency securities are classified as Level 2. k Obligations and States subdivisions of Puerto Rico, political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two sided markets, quotes, benchmark Treasury not curves benchmarks, LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. including limited but to k Mortgage-backed securities: Certain agency mortgage- backed securities (“MBS”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced using an internally-prepared pricing matrix with quoted prices from local brokers dealers. These particular MBS are classified as Level 3. k Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These CMOs are classified as Level 2. Other CMOs, due to their limited liquidity, are classified as Level 3 due to the insufficiency of inputs such as broker quotes, executed trades, credit information and cash flows. k Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. k Corporate securities, commercial paper and mutual funds (included as “other” in the “trading account securities” category): Quoted prices for these security types are the quoted obtained from broker dealers. Given that 189 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Currently, the associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3. Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounted cash flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3. Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals. Note 37 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions. The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items. Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value. For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions. as well The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate environment at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In different interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values the presented do not attempt to estimate the value of Corporation’s fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporation’s value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are described in the paragraphs below. Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts of other liabilities reported in the consolidated statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, assets sold under agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings. The equity appreciation instrument is included in other liabilities and is accounted at fair value. Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements provides a description of the valuation methodology for the equity appreciation instrument and FDIC loss sharing indemnification asset. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities are valued using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements with similar terms and remaining maturities. financial condition, instruments Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statements of that are regularly trade on secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are marked-to-market for accounting purposes. commercial, The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale was based on secondary market prices, bids received from potential buyers and discounted cash flow models. The fair values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were segregated by type residential mortgage, construction, such as consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non- interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts was, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates with similar maturities. The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in part dependent of the buyer’s ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes occurs. Therefore, the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary significantly from the presented fair value. Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using quoted market at rates December 31, 2010 and 2009. instruments similar for 190 (regular agreements including repurchase As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, its where applicable, evaluation of non-performance risk. Also, for certificates of deposit, the non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the institution. the collateralization levels as part of Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements. The following table presents the carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments. (In thousands) Carrying amount Fair value Carrying amount Fair value December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Financial Assets: Cash and money market investments Trading securities Investment securities available-for-sale Investment securities held-to-maturity Other investment securities Loans held-for-sale Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the $1,431,668 546,713 5,236,852 122,354 163,513 893,938 $1,431,668 546,713 5,236,852 120,873 165,233 902,371 $1,680,127 462,436 6,694,714 212,962 164,149 90,796 $1,680,127 462,436 6,694,714 213,146 165,497 91,542 FDIC 19,934,810 17,137,805 22,451,909 20,021,224 Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC FDIC loss share indemnification asset Financial Liabilities: Deposits Assets sold under agreements to repurchase Short-term borrowings Notes payable Equity appreciation instrument (In thousands) Commitments to extend credit Letters of credit 4,836,882 2,311,997 4,744,680 2,376,936 – – – – $26,762,200 2,412,550 364,222 4,170,183 9,945 $26,873,408 2,503,320 364,222 4,067,818 9,945 $25,924,894 2,632,790 7,326 2,648,632 – $26,076,515 2,759,438 7,326 2,453,037 – Notional Amount Fair value Notional amount Fair value $5,879,051 152,596 $983 3,318 $7,013,148 147,647 $882 1,565 191 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Note 38 - Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows: Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are listed in the following table: (In thousands) Income Taxes Paid Interest Paid Non-cash activities: Loans transferred to other real estate Loans transferred to other property Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale [1] Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio Loans securitized into investment securities [2] Write-downs related to loans transferred to loans held-for-sale Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers Gain on retained interest (sale of EVERTEC) Treasury stock retired Change in par value of common stock Conversion of preferred stock to common stock: Preferred stock converted Common stock issued Trust preferred securities exchanged for new common stock issued: Trust preferred securities exchanged New common stock issued Preferred stock exchanged for new common stock issued: Preferred stock exchanged (Series A and B) New common stock issued Preferred stock exchanged for new trust preferred securities issued: Preferred stock exchanged (Series C) New trust preferred securities issued (junior subordinated debentures) 2010 2009 2008 $41,052 682,943 $23,622 801,475 $81,115 1,165,930 $183,901 37,383 $146,043 37,529 221,284 183,572 1,020,889 33,072 12,388 180,735 817,528 1,355,456 327,207 – 15,326 23,795 93,970 – 207,139 – – 1,689,389 $112,870 83,833 196,703 473,442 65,793 1,686,141 12,430 28,919 – – – (1,150,000) 1,341,667 – – – – – – – – (397,911) 317,652 (524,079) 293,691 (901,165) 415,885 – – – – – – – – [1] In 2008, amount excludes $375 million in individual mortgage loans transferred to held-for-sale and sold as well as $232 million of mortgage loans securitized into trading securities and immediately sold. [2] Includes loan securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before year end. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the changes in operating assets and liabilities included in the reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities, as well as the changes in assets and liabilities presented in the investing and financing sections are net of the effect of the assets acquired and assumed from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted liabilities transaction. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition and balances of the assets and liabilities recorded at fair value by the Corporation on April 30, 2010. The cash received in the transaction, which amounted to $261 million, is presented in the investing activities section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as “Cash received from acquisitions”. Note 39 - Segment reporting: The Corporation’s corporate structure consists of two reportable segments - Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. 2010, the sale, on September As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation 30, completed the sale of a 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which included the merchant acquiring business of BPPR. EVERTEC was reported as a reportable segment prior to such date, while the merchant acquiring business was originally included in the BPPR reportable segment through June 30, 2010. As a result of the Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as a reportable segment and therefore, and information for historical merchant acquiring businesses has been reclassified under the Corporate group for all periods presented. Additionally, the Corporation retained EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A. and its equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa, which were included in the EVERTEC reportable segment through June 30, 2010, and are now also included in the Corporate group for all periods presented. Revenue from the remaining ownership interest in EVERTEC will be prospectively reported as non- interest income in the Corporate group. the processing financial Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess 192 The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North America and Popular in International Bank, including the equity investments it CONTADO and Serfinsa. Also, as discussed previously, includes the results of EVERTEC for all periods presented. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate to the are organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal. identified as critical areas that The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations. The following tables present the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, excluding the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH. Segment assets also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations. December 31, 2010 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax expense Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Intersegment Eliminations $1,095,932 609,630 448,301 5,449 38,364 1,171 815,947 27,120 $309,985 402,250 54,570 3,181 9,109 21,866 264,110 4,318 Net income (loss) Segment Assets $46,552 ($340,279) $29,337,322 $8,973,984 ($28,662) (In thousands) Net interest income (loss) Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax expense December 31, 2010 Reportable Segments $1,405,917 1,011,880 502,871 8,630 47,473 23,037 1,080,057 31,438 Corporate Eliminations ($111,747) $695 912,555 543 11,388 15,750 263,270 76,995 (127,233) (124,601) (203) Total Popular, Inc. $1,294,865 1,011,880 1,288,193 9,173 58,861 38,787 1,218,726 108,230 Net (loss) income ($293,727) $432,862 ($1,734) $137,401 Segment Assets $38,282,644 $5,583,501 ($5,143,183) $38,722,962 where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico: Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporation’s results of operations and total assets at December 31, 2010, additional disclosures are provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below: k Commercial banking represents the Corporation’s banking operations conducted at BPPR, which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. k Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. k Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income. a retail through Banco Popular North America: Banco Popular North America’s reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA, E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNA’s deposit gathering through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across the BPNA branch network. network branch in Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are as follows: December 31, 2010 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Commercial Banking Consumer and Retail Banking Other Financial Services Eliminations Total Banco Popular de Puerto Rico $443,242 $643,076 $9,392 $222 $1,095,932 464,214 133,674 145,416 211,242 103,552 (167) 558 4,313 578 16,760 20,464 1,140 1,171 609,630 448,301 5,449 38,364 1,171 272,755 477,859 65,619 (286) 815,947 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax (benefit) expense (68,791) 79,206 16,575 Net (loss) income ($109,751) $127,060 $29,032 130 $211 27,120 $46,552 Segment Assets $15,537,079 $21,479,318 $462,771 ($8,141,846) $29,337,322 December 31, 2009 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Commercial Banking Consumer and Retail Banking Other Financial Services Eliminations Total Banco Popular de Puerto Rico $299,668 $554,677 $11,716 $528 $866,589 427,501 159,242 196,031 407,527 100,698 (688) 162 4,177 692 16,187 20,237 1,256 1,959 623,532 666,779 5,031 37,680 1,959 211,933 434,337 62,211 (274) 708,207 (105,470) ($93,362) 87,281 16,831 $220,141 $31,424 50 $64 (1,308) $158,267 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax (benefit) expense Net (loss) income Segment Assets $9,679,767 $17,285,538 $467,645 ($3,821,195) $23,611,755 193 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT December 31, 2009 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax benefit Net income (loss) Segment Assets Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Intersegment Eliminations $866,589 623,532 666,779 5,031 37,680 1,959 708,207 (1,308) $315,469 782,275 30,231 3,641 10,811 299,726 (24,896) $158,267 ($725,857) ($22) (3) 11 $14 $23,611,755 $10,846,748 ($40,150) December 31, 2009 (In thousands) Net interest income (loss) Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss (gain) on early Total Reportable Segments $1,182,058 1,405,807 697,010 8,672 48,469 extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax (benefit) expense 1,959 1,007,930 (26,193) Corporate Eliminations ($81,817) $1,012 (137,691) Total Popular, Inc. $1,101,253 1,405,807 896,501 9,482 64,451 337,182 810 15,982 (78,337) 281,938 17,295 (1,922) (131,305) 596 (78,300) 1,158,563 (8,302) Net (loss) income ($567,576) $17,677 ($4,048) ($553,947) Segment Assets $34,418,353 $5,546,045 ($5,228,073) $34,736,325 December 31, 2008 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Other operating expenses Income tax expense Net income (loss) Segment assets Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Intersegment Eliminations $958,991 519,045 531,962 1,623 4,975 39,731 683,906 14,191 $351,519 472,299 141,006 10,857 5,643 14,027 399,867 114,670 $227,482 ($524,838) ($627) (73) (685) 53 $78 $25,928,223 $12,441,612 ($25,319) (In thousands) Net interest income (loss) Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Other operating expenses Income tax expense December 31, 2008 Total Reportable Segments $1,310,510 991,344 672,341 12,480 10,618 53,685 1,083,088 128,914 Corporate Eliminations ($32,512) 40 295,875 $1,206 (138,242) 891 18,705 291,586 332,253 (134,325) 367 Total Popular, Inc. $1,279,204 991,384 829,974 12,480 11,509 72,390 1,240,349 461,534 Net loss ($297,278) ($380,112) ($3,078) ($680,468) Segment Assets $38,344,516 $6,412,123 ($5,886,457) $38,870,182 194 December 31, 2008 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Commercial Banking Consumer and Retail Banking Other Financial Services Eliminations Total Banco Popular de Puerto Rico $347,952 $598,398 $12,097 $544 $958,991 348,998 114,844 170,047 317,824 99,502 (208) 1,623 4,113 650 212 17,805 20,648 1,278 519,045 531,962 1,623 4,975 39,731 194,589 424,971 64,642 (296) 683,906 December 31, 2008 Banco Popular North America (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Other operating expenses Income tax expense Banco Popular North America E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco Popular North America $328,713 346,000 127,903 $21,458 126,299 13,915 $1,348 (812) $351,519 472,299 141,006 4,144 12,172 327,736 57,521 10,857 1,499 1,855 72,117 56,618 10,857 5,643 14,027 399,867 114,670 14 531 Net loss ($290,957) ($233,872) ($9) ($524,838) Segment Assets $12,913,337 $759,082 ($1,230,807) $12,441,612 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Goodwill impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Other operating expenses Income tax (benefit) expense (60,769) 59,490 15,158 Net (loss) income ($38,039) $235,330 $29,871 312 $320 14,191 $227,482 Segment Assets $11,148,150 $18,899,992 $579,463 ($4,699,382) $25,928,223 Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segments are as follows: December 31, 2010 Banco Popular North America (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income (loss) Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Income tax expense Banco Popular North America E-LOAN Eliminations Total Banco Popular North America $305,893 400,077 73,032 3,181 8,539 21,866 256,855 1,589 $4,148 2,173 (18,462) 570 7,255 2,729 ($56) $309,985 402,250 54,570 3,181 9,109 21,866 264,110 4,318 Intersegment revenues [1] (In thousands) Interest income: Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Interest expense: Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Banco Popular North America Net interest income 2010 2009 2008 $14 $4 (14) $0 (4) $0 $257 3,007 (3,007) (257) $0 [1] For purposes of the intersegment revenues disclosure, revenues include interest income (expense) related to internal funding and other non-interest income derived from intercompany transactions. Geographic Information (In thousands) Revenues [1]: Puerto Rico United States Other 2010 2009 2008 $2,138,629 339,664 104,765 $1,566,081 306,667 125,006 $1,568,837 432,008 108,333 Net loss ($313,182) ($27,041) ($56) ($340,279) Total consolidated revenues from continuing Segment Assets $9,632,188 $490,845 ($1,149,049) $8,973,984 December 31, 2009 Banco Popular North America (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income (loss) Amortization of intangibles Depreciation expense Other operating expenses Income tax benefit Banco Popular North America E-LOAN Eliminations $303,700 641,668 70,059 3,641 9,627 283,113 (7,665) $10,593 140,607 (39,706) 1,184 16,610 (17,231) $1,176 (122) 3 Total Banco Popular North America $315,469 782,275 30,231 3,641 10,811 299,726 (24,896) Net loss ($556,625) ($170,283) $1,051 ($725,857) Segment Assets $11,478,201 $560,885 ($1,192,338) $10,846,748 operations $2,583,058 $1,997,754 $2,109,178 [1] Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities, trading account profit, gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, FDIC loss share expense, fair value change in equity appreciation instrument, gain on sale of processing and technology business and other operating income. Selected Balance Sheet Information: [1] (In thousands) Puerto Rico Total assets Loans Deposits United States Total assets Loans Deposits Other Total assets Loans Deposits 2010 2009 2008 $28,464,243 18,729,654 19,149,753 $22,480,832 14,176,793 16,634,123 $24,886,736 15,160,033 16,737,693 $9,087,737 6,978,007 6,566,710 $11,033,114 8,825,559 8,242,604 $12,713,357 10,417,840 9,662,690 $1,170,982 751,194 1,045,737 $1,222,379 801,557 1,048,167 $1,270,089 691,058 1,149,822 [1] Does not include balance sheet information of the discontinued operations at December 31, 2008. 195 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT events that would require Note 40 – Subsequent events: Management has evaluated the effects of subsequent events that have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2010. There are no recognition in the material ended year consolidated December to subsequent 2010. Events December 31, 2010 not disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements are included in the section below. for occurring statements financial the 31, BPPR – Sale of Construction and Commercial Loans In January 2011, BPPR signed a non-binding letter of intent to sell approximately $500 million (book value) of construction and commercial real estate loans, approximately 75% of which are non-performing, to a newly created joint venture that will be majority owned by an unrelated third party for a purchase price equal to 47% of their unpaid principal balance at December 31, 2010. The loans are part of a portfolio of approximately $603 million (book value) of construction, commercial real estate loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2010. The unpaid principal balance of the loans does not reflect any charge-offs previously taken by the Corporation, which are reflected in their book value. and land loans reclassified as that were As part of the transaction, BPPR will make a 24.9% equity investment in the venture. BPPR will also provide financing to the venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to 50% of the purchase price and certain closing costs. In addition, BPPR will provide financing to the venture to cover unfunded commitments related to certain construction projects (subject to customary conditions of construction draws) and to fund certain operating expenses of the venture. The transaction, which is subject to the completion of due diligence and the execution of definitive documentation, as well as customary closing conditions, is expected to close during the first quarter of 2011. The terms of the non-binding letter were used as a basis for pricing the loans on an aggregate basis upon reclassification to loans held-for-sale. BPNA – Sale of Non-Conventional Mortgage Loans On February 28, 2011, BPNA sold to an unrelated third party approximately $288 million (book value) of its approximately $396 million (book value) non-conventional mortgage portfolio classified as held-for-sale at December 31, 2010, for a purchase price of approximately $156 million, or 44% of their legal unpaid principal balance. BPNA is engaged in negotiations to sell the remaining portion of this portfolio to the same unrelated third party. New Tax Code in Puerto Rico On January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law a new Internal Revenue Code for Puerto Rico. The most significant impact on corporations of this new Code is the reduction in the marginal corporate income tax rate from 39% to 30%. As a result of this reduction in rate, the Corporation will recognize an additional tax expense of $103.3 million during the first quarter of 2011 and a corresponding reduction in its deferred tax assets, which had been recognized at the higher marginal corporate income tax rate. Under the new code, the Corporation has a one-time election to opt-out of the new reduced rate. This election must be made with the filing of the 2011 income tax return. Currently, the corporate income tax rate is 40.95% due to a temporary five percent surtax approved in March 2009 for years beginning on January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011. Note 41 - Popular, Inc. (Holding company only) financial information: The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company only at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Statements of Condition (In thousands) Assets Cash Money market investments Investments securities available-for-sale, at market value Investments securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (includes $185,000 in subordinated notes from BPPR; 2009 - $430,000) Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value Investment in BPPR and subsidiaries, at equity Investment in Popular International Bank and subsidiaries, at equity Investment in other subsidiaries, at equity Advances to subsidiaries Loans to affiliates Loans Less - Allowance for loan losses Premises and equipment Investments in equity investees Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Accrued expenses and other liabilities Stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 196 December 31, 2010 2009 $1,638 1 35,263 210,872 10,850 2,521,684 1,193,413 121,161 412,200 61,460 2,422 60 2,830 181,009 67,264 $1,174 51 455,777 10,850 1,910,695 867,275 268,372 100,600 6,666 2,366 60 2,907 4,400 30,176 $4,822,007 $3,661,249 $835,793 185,683 3,800,531 $24,225 1,064,462 33,745 2,538,817 $4,822,007 $3,661,249 197 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Statements of Operations (In thousands) Income: Dividends from subsidiaries Interest on money market and investments securities Gain on sale of processing and technology businesses Earnings (losses) from investments under the equity method Other operating (loss) income Gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities Interest on advances to subsidiaries Interest on loans to affiliates Interest on loans Total income Expenses Interest expense Provision for loan losses Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt Operating expenses Total expenses Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Income taxes Income before equity in undistributed net losses of subsidiaries Equity in undistributed net losses of subsidiaries Net income (loss) Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 $168,100 23,634 640,802 3,402 (120) 5,739 1,738 150 $160,625 37,229 $179,900 32,642 692 3,008 8,133 888 127 (110) 95 19,812 1,022 173 843,445 210,702 233,534 111,809 74,980 15,750 35,923 163,482 679,963 80,444 (26,439) 7,018 55,559 155,143 (891) 42,061 40 2,614 44,715 188,819 366 599,519 (462,118) 156,034 (729,953) 188,453 (1,432,356) $137,401 ($573,919) ($1,243,903) Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries and dividends from subsidiaries Provision for loans losses Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities Amortization of discount on junior subordinated debentures Benefit on early extinguishment of debt Gain on sale of processing and technology business, net of transaction costs Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums on investments and deferred fees (Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method Stock options expense Net decrease in other assets Deferred income taxes Net (decrease) increase in interest payable Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in money market investments Purchases of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale Capital contribution to subsidiaries Transfer of shares of a subsidiary Net change in advances to subsidiaries and affiliates Net (disbursements) repayments on loans Net proceeds from sale of processing and technology business Acquisition of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased Net decrease in other short-term borrowings Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes Proceeds from issuance of notes payable Net proceeds from issuance of depository shares Dividends paid Proceeds from issuance of common stock Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and associated warrants Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities Treasury stock acquired Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash Cash at beginning of year Cash at end of year 198 Year ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 $137,401 ($573,919) ($1,243,903) 462,118 729,953 1,432,356 40 21,331 (616,186) (49) (3,402) 7,263 8,831 (528) 42,578 (78,044) 59,357 (3,008) 6,765 (26,439) 335 (692) 91 22,774 (1,850) 6,455 (1,797) 732,587 158,668 (1,791) 110 412 2,435 (444) (1,982) 9,511 1,440,647 196,744 49 89,643 (43,294) (35,000) (52,796) (249,603) (51,539) (188,673) (605,079) 297,747 (1,345,000) (366,394) (56) 617,976 (890) 183 74 (884,107) (24,225) (250,000) 1,100,155 (310) 153 (559) 825,214 464 1,174 $1,638 14,226 27,318 426,666 (940,000) (42,971) 714,000 3,578 (310) 14,943 47 5,998 (44,471) (18,544) (71,438) (29,024) (17) (163,494) 1,172 2 $1,174 801,500 (251,512) (1,302,100) 156 (664) (1,589,666) 44,471 (122,232) (31,152) 350,297 (188,644) 17,712 1,321,142 (61) 1,391,533 (1,389) 1,391 $2 199 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Notes payable at December 31, 2010 mature as follows: Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Later years No stated maturity Subtotal Less: Discount Total (In thousands) – $100,000 – – – 290,812 936,000 1,326,812 (491,019) $835,793 A source of income for the Holding Company consists of dividends from BPPR. BPPR and BPNA must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared by each entity during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. The payment of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels described in Note 25. Subject to the Federal Reserve’s ability to establish more stringent specific requirements under its supervisory or enforcement authority, at December 31, 2010, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $78 million. At December 31, 2009, BPPR was required to obtain approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. BPNA could not declare any dividends without the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Note 42 - Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities: the financial position of Popular, The following condensed consolidating financial information Inc. Holding presents Company (“PIHC”) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (“PIBI”), Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Popular Insurance V.I., Inc; Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A.; and PNA. Prior to the internal reorganization and sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC, ATH Costa Rica S.A., and T.I.I. Smart Solutions Inc. were also wholly-owned subsidiaries of PIBI. PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Equity One, Inc.; and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly- owned subsidiaries Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc. PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA. 200 Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Condition (In thousands) Assets Cash and due from banks Money market investments Trading account securities, at fair value Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value Investment in subsidiaries Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value Loans held-in-portfolio: Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC Less - Unearned income Allowance for loan losses Total loans held-in-portfolio, net FDIC loss share indemnification asset Premises and equipment, net Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC Accrued income receivable Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value Other assets Goodwill Other intangible assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Liabilities: Deposits: Non-interest bearing Interest bearing Total deposits Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Subordinated notes Other liabilities Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock Common stock Surplus Accumulated deficit Treasury stock, at cost Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. PNA Holding Co. All other subsidiaries Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated At December 31, 2010 $1,638 1 35,263 210,872 10,850 3,836,258 $618 7,512 3,863 1,000 1 1,096,907 $1,576 261 4,492 1,578,986 476,082 1,285 60 $451,723 979,232 546,713 5,216,013 95,482 148,170 893,938 20,798,876 4,836,882 106,241 793,165 ($3,182) (7,711) (18,287) (185,000) (6,512,151) (441,967) $452,373 979,295 546,713 5,236,852 122,354 163,513 893,938 20,834,276 4,836,882 106,241 793,225 476,022 1,285 24,736,352 (441,967) 24,771,692 2,830 122 1,510 33 111 246,209 86,116 15,105 554 2,311,997 542,501 161,496 57,565 149,101 166,907 1,134,056 647,387 58,142 2,311,997 545,453 161,496 57,565 150,658 166,907 1,456,073 647,387 58,696 (97) (25,413) $4,822,007 $1,197,335 $1,600,653 $38,296,775 ($7,193,808) $38,722,962 $4,961,417 21,830,669 26,792,086 2,412,550 743,922 2,905,554 185,000 1,028,614 ($22,096) (7,790) $4,939,321 21,822,879 (29,886) 26,762,200 (412,200) (1,285) (185,000) (52,111) 2,412,550 364,222 4,170,183 1,213,276 $32,500 430,121 47,169 509,790 34,067,726 (680,482) 34,922,431 $3,921 3,921 4,066 4,158,157 (2,958,347) 2 4,066,208 (3,000,682) 51,633 5,862,091 (1,714,659) (55,701) (14,077,929) 7,665,161 (10,462) 25,335 29,984 (44,857) 50,160 10,229 4,094,005 (347,328) (574) (5,961) $835,793 185,683 1,021,476 50,160 10,229 4,085,478 (338,801) (574) (5,961) Total stockholders’ equity 3,800,531 1,193,414 1,090,863 4,229,049 (6,513,326) 3,800,531 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $4,822,007 $1,197,335 $1,600,653 $38,296,775 ($7,193,808) $38,722,962 201 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Condensed Consolidating Statement of Condition (In thousands) ASSETS Cash and due from banks Money market investments Trading account securities, at fair value Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value Investment in subsidiaries Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value Loans held-in-portfolio Less — Unearned income Allowance for loan losses Total loans held-in-portfolio, net Premises and equipment, net Other real estate Accrued income receivable Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value Other assets Goodwill Other intangible assets Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. PNA Holding Co. All other subsidiaries and eliminations Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated At December 31, 2009 $1,174 51 455,777 10,850 3,046,342 109,632 60 109,572 2,907 74 120 $300 56,144 2,448 1,250 1 733,737 $738 238 4,492 1,156,680 125 132 127 33,828 73,308 21,162 554 $677,606 1,002,702 462,436 6,694,053 185,935 148,806 90,796 23,844,455 114,150 1,261,144 22,469,161 581,821 125,409 125,857 169,747 1,244,857 604,349 43,249 ($2,488) (56,338) (1,787) (430,000) (4,936,759) (126,824) $677,330 1,002,797 462,436 6,694,714 212,962 164,149 90,796 23,827,263 114,150 1,261,204 (126,824) 22,451,909 (156) (48,238) 584,853 125,483 126,080 169,747 1,324,917 604,349 43,803 Total assets $3,661,249 $867,315 $1,183,567 $34,626,784 ($5,602,590) $34,736,325 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Liabilities: Deposits: Non-interest bearing Interest bearing Total deposits Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Other short-term borrowings Notes payable Subordinated notes Other liabilities Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock Common stock Surplus Accumulated deficit Treasury stock, at cost Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax Total stockholders’ equity $4,497,730 21,485,931 25,983,661 2,632,790 107,226 1,152,324 430,000 954,525 ($2,429) (56,338) $4,495,301 21,429,593 (58,767) 25,924,894 (124,825) (2,000) (430,000) (49,991) 2,632,790 7,326 2,648,632 983,866 31,260,526 (665,583) 32,197,508 52,322 4,637,181 (1,329,311) (56,285) (11,388,916) 6,491,723 6,066 16,471 50,160 6,395 2,804,238 (292,752) (15) (29,209) 3,366,258 (4,937,007) 2,538,817 $24,225 1,064,462 33,745 1,122,432 50,160 6,395 2,797,328 (285,842) (15) (29,209) 2,538,817 $700 433,846 45,547 480,093 $40 40 3,961 3,437,437 (2,541,802) (32,321) 867,275 2 3,321,208 (2,627,520) 9,784 703,474 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $3,661,249 $867,315 $1,183,567 $34,626,784 ($5,602,590) $34,736,325 Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses 87,552 7,802 (30,772) 7,802 (30,772) Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (In thousands) INTEREST INCOME AND DIVIDEND INCOME: Dividend income from subsidiaries Loans Money market investments Investment securities Trading account securities Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. $168,100 7,627 55 23,579 $7,500 19 252 31 Total interest and dividend income 199,361 7,802 INTEREST EXPENSE: Deposits Short-term borrowings Long-term debt Total interest expense Net interest income (expense) Provision for loan losses 46 111,763 111,809 87,552 Service charges on deposit accounts Other service fees Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Trading account profit Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale FDIC loss share expense Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument Gain on sale of processing and technology business Other operating income (loss) Total non-interest income (loss) OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel costs: Salaries Pension and other benefits Total personnel costs Net occupancy expenses Equipment expenses Other taxes Professional fees Communications Business promotion Printing and supplies FDIC deposit insurance Loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Amortization of intangibles Total operating expenses Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries Income tax expense (benefit) Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries 640,802 3,282 644,084 19,498 3,077 22,575 2,941 2,887 1,816 31,590 481 1,275 70 15,750 (27,712) 51,673 679,963 80,444 599,519 (462,118) 202 Year ended December 31, 2010 All other subsidiaries and eliminations PNA Holding Co. Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated $1,675,477 5,383 235,521 27,918 1,944,299 351,180 65,550 121,328 538,058 1,406,241 1,011,880 394,361 195,803 382,350 3,992 16,404 (56,139) (25,751) 42,555 90,546 649,760 392,553 99,030 491,583 112,240 82,962 48,792 154,347 38,389 45,396 9,232 67,644 23,037 211,528 9,173 ($175,600) (6,389) (308) (21,243) $1,676,734 5,384 238,210 27,918 (203,540) 1,948,246 (299) (5,828) (21,455) 350,881 60,278 242,222 (27,582) 653,381 (175,958) 1,294,865 1,011,880 (175,958) 282,985 (4,846) (18,632) 195,803 377,504 3,992 16,404 (56,139) (25,751) 42,555 640,802 93,023 (23,478) 1,288,193 (381) (18) (399) 985 (19,865) (1,749) 412,057 102,141 514,198 116,203 85,851 50,608 166,105 38,905 46,671 9,302 67,644 38,787 182,100 9,173 1,294,323 (21,028) 1,325,547 $2 322 324 510 30,586 31,096 3 11 14 432 460 (35,212) (296) (34,916) (338,246) (250,202) 25,101 (275,303) (178,408) (262) (178,146) 1,179,256 245,631 108,230 137,401 21,807 21,807 (3,980) (3,980) 387 52 439 34 2 22 21 (399) 119 29,490 3,243 26,247 (378,892) NET INCOME (LOSS) $137,401 ($352,645) ($373,162) ($275,303) $1,001,110 $137,401 203 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (In thousands) INTEREST INCOME AND DIVIDEND INCOME: Dividend income from subsidiaries Loans Money market investments Investment securities Trading account securities Total interest and dividend income INTEREST EXPENSE: Deposits Short-term borrowings Long-term debt Total interest expense Net interest income (expense) Provision for loan losses Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. Year ended December 31, 2009 All other subsidiaries and eliminations PNA Holding Co. Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated $160,625 9,148 109 37,120 207,002 169 74,811 74,980 132,022 $7,500 1,306 70 8,876 8,876 8,876 $20,000 44 2,156 703 22,903 45 58,581 58,626 (35,723) $1,518,431 8,573 281,887 35,190 1,844,081 504,732 77,548 78,609 660,889 1,183,192 1,405,807 ($188,125) (8,374) (3,574) (27,792) $1,519,249 8,570 291,988 35,190 (227,865) 1,854,997 (3,470) (8,405) (28,876) (40,751) (187,114) 501,262 69,357 183,125 753,744 1,101,253 1,405,807 (35,723) (222,615) (187,114) (304,554) Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses 132,022 Service charges on deposit accounts Other service fees Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities 3,008 (10,934) Trading account profit Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale Other operating income (loss) Total non-interest income (loss) OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel costs: Salaries Pension and other benefits Total personnel costs Net occupancy expenses Equipment expenses Other taxes Professional fees Communications Business promotion Printing and supplies Impairment losses on long-lived assets FDIC deposit insurance (Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt Other operating expenses Amortization of intangibles 16,558 5,624 (1,184) (1,184) 368 59 427 30 14 20 3 4 (55) 23 692 3,700 24,238 3,918 28,156 2,613 3,683 3,544 15,676 443 1,182 74 (26,439) (48,353) (400) (51,897) 238 213,493 401,934 229,530 39,740 (35,060) 52,778 902,415 387,004 118,694 505,698 108,389 97,843 49,061 100,831 45,778 37,690 11,019 1,545 76,796 1,959 188,947 9,482 (7,747) (2,058) (4,249) 213,493 394,187 219,546 39,740 (35,060) 64,595 (14,054) 896,501 (994) (24) (1,018) (5,179) (1,923) (1,708) 410,616 122,647 533,263 111,035 101,530 52,605 111,287 46,264 38,872 11,093 1,545 76,796 (78,300) 138,724 9,482 Total operating expenses (19,421) 91 (51,684) 1,235,038 (9,828) 1,154,196 Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries Income tax (benefit) expense Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations 155,143 (891) 156,034 (709,981) (553,947) 14,409 26 14,383 (739,039) (724,656) 14,777 21,601 (6,824) (735,305) (742,129) (19,972) (19,972) (19,972) (555,238) (29,729) (525,509) (525,509) (19,972) (191,340) 691 (192,031) 2,184,325 1,992,294 59,916 (562,249) (8,302) (553,947) (553,947) (19,972) NET LOSS ($573,919) ($744,628) ($762,101) ($545,481) $2,052,210 ($573,919) Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (In thousands) INTEREST INCOME AND DIVIDEND INCOME: Dividend income from subsidiaries Loans Money market investments Investment securities Trading account securities Total interest and dividend income INTEREST EXPENSE: Deposits Short-term borrowings Long-term debt Total interest expense Net interest income (expense) Provision for loan losses Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses Service charges on deposit accounts Other service fees Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities Trading account profit Gain on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale Other operating (loss) income Total non-interest (loss) income OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel costs: Salaries Pension and other benefits Total personnel costs Net occupancy expenses Equipment expenses Other taxes Professional fees Communications Business promotion Printing and supplies Impairment losses on long-lived assets FDIC deposit insurance Other operating expenses Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Amortization of intangibles Total operating expenses Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries Income tax expense Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. Year ended December 31, 2008 All other subsidiaries and eliminations PNA Holding Co. $179,900 21,007 1,730 30,912 233,549 2,943 39,118 42,061 191,488 40 191,448 $89,167 1,918 894 91,979 18,818 120,605 139,423 (47,444) (47,444) $219 1,073 766 2,058 2,058 2,058 (9,147) (15) (15) 11,844 2,697 (31,447) (31,447) 22,363 4,816 27,179 2,582 3,697 2,590 19,573 314 1,621 70 395 75 470 29 12 19 3 (24) 37 (55,012) (401) (954) $1,868,717 19,056 339,059 44,111 2,270,943 702,858 181,059 75,178 959,095 1,311,848 991,344 320,504 206,957 424,971 78,863 43,645 6,018 111,360 871,814 464,971 117,927 582,898 117,842 107,781 50,209 107,253 51,016 61,110 14,380 13,491 15,037 199,264 12,480 11,509 204 Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated ($179,900) (110,648) (5,795) (28,063) $1,868,462 17,982 343,568 44,111 (324,406) 2,274,123 (2,736) (34,750) (108,174) (145,660) (178,746) (178,746) (8,808) (4,267) 700,122 168,070 126,727 994,919 1,279,204 991,384 287,820 206,957 416,163 69,716 43,645 6,018 87,475 (13,075) 829,974 (2,009) (73) (2,082) (5,669) (1,596) 485,720 122,745 608,465 120,456 111,478 52,799 121,145 51,386 62,731 14,450 13,491 15,037 141,301 12,480 11,509 2,614 188,819 366 188,453 (868,921) (680,468) 129 4,626 4,626 (929,637) (925,011) (938) 1,344,270 (9,347) 1,336,728 (77,953) 12,962 (90,915) (849,432) (940,347) (151,952) 447,730 (599,682) (599,682) (563,435) (182,474) 476 (182,950) 2,647,990 2,465,040 1,690,305 (218,934) 461,534 (680,468) (680,468) (563,435) (563,435) (563,435) (563,435) NET LOSS ($1,243,903) ($1,488,446) ($1,503,782) ($1,163,117) $4,155,345 ($1,243,903) 205 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment Provision for loan losses Amortization of intangibles Fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights Net amortization of premiums and deferred fees (accretion of discounts) Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument FDIC loss share expense FDIC deposit insurance expense Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale Cost on early extinguishment of debt Gain on sale of processing and technology business, net of transaction costs (Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale Net decrease in trading securities Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable Net decrease in other assets Net (decrease) increase in interest payable Deferred income taxes Net decrease in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in money market investments Purchases of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale Net (disbursements) repayments on loans Proceeds from sale of loans Acquisition of loan portfolios Capital contribution to subsidiary Cash received from acquisitions Net proceeds from sale of processing and technology businesses Mortgage servicing rights purchased Acquisition of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. Year ended December 31, 2010 All other subsidiaries and eliminations PNA Holding Co. Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated $137,401 ($352,645) ($373,162) ($275,303) $1,001,110 $137,401 462,118 785 21,282 2 (616,186) (3,402) (1,390) 7,866 (528) 8,831 42,578 (78,044) 59,357 378,892 338,246 3 275 (21,807) 3,981 94 6,689 3,882 367,750 15,105 20 2,077 81 1,540 346,223 (26,939) 49 48,632 (23) (35,000) (52,796) 297,747 (366,450) 250 231 (1,345,000) (745,000) (745,000) 617,976 (890) 183 74 58,073 1,011,880 9,173 22,859 (275,786) (3,992) (42,555) 25,751 67,644 (1,814) 56,139 1,171 (2,354) (735,095) (307,629) 81,370 721,398 12,650 24,368 (29,201) (23,392) (11,060) (64,861) 594,737 319,434 119,710 (746,192) (44,392) (64,591) 1,865,879 135,132 123,836 397,086 1,591,839 34,011 (256,406) 261,311 24,346 (1,041) (65,965) 14,277 141,162 (1,179,256) (650) 13,719 (59) (44,559) 86 2,434 3,377 (1,204,908) (203,798) 58,861 1,011,880 9,173 22,859 (254,879) (3,992) (42,555) 25,751 67,644 (1,812) 56,139 1,171 (616,186) (9,863) (735,095) (307,629) 81,370 721,398 11,315 (3,559) (29,562) (12,127) (11,060) (13,484) 25,758 163,159 (48,627) 119,741 17,150 (245,000) 313,626 2,835,000 (764,042) (97,188) (64,591) 1,865,879 188,129 123,836 397,086 1,539,246 34,011 (256,406) 261,311 642,322 (1,041) (66,855) 14,460 141,236 Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (884,107) (695,887) (745,023) 3,530,002 2,872,149 4,077,134 Cash flows from financing activities: Net decrease in deposits Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to repurchase Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes Proceeds from issuance of notes payable Proceeds from issuance of common stock Net proceeds from issuance of depository shares Dividends paid Dividends paid to parent company Treasury stock acquired Capital contribution from parent Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of period Cash and due from banks at end of period (24,225) (250,000) 153 1,100,155 (310) (559) 825,214 464 1,174 $1,638 (63,900) 745,000 681,100 318 300 $618 31,800 (4,000) 745,000 772,800 838 738 $1,576 (1,582,367) (220,240) 636,696 (4,253,578) 110,870 (111,700) 1,345,000 (4,075,319) (225,883) 677,606 $451,723 28,881 (287,375) 247,000 231 1,618 175,600 (2,835,000) (1,553,486) (220,240) 356,896 (4,260,578) 111,101 153 1,101,773 (310) (559) (2,669,045) (4,465,250) (694) (2,488) (224,957) 677,330 ($3,182) $452,373 206 Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment Provision for loan losses Impairment losses on long-lived assets Amortization of intangibles Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights Net amortization of premiums and deferred fees Net (gain) loss on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities FDIC deposit insurance expense Earnings from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale (Benefit) cost on early extinguishment of debt (Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method Stock options expense Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale Net decrease in trading securities Net decrease in accrued income receivable Net decrease (increase) in other assets Net increase (decrease) in interest payable Deferred income taxes Net increase in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in money market investments Purchases of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale Proceeds from sale of other investment securities Net repayments on loans Proceeds from sale of loans Acquisition of loan portfolios Capital contribution to subsidiary Transfer of shares of a subsidiary Mortgage servicing rights purchased Acquisition of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Net decrease in deposits Net decrease in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings Payments of notes payable Proceeds from issuance of notes payable Dividends paid to parent company Dividends paid Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities Treasury stock acquired Capital contribution from parent Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of period Cash and due from banks at end of period Year ended December 31, 2009 Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. PNA Holding Co. All other subsidiaries and eliminations Elimination entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated ($573,919) ($744,628) ($762,101) ($545,481) $2,052,210 ($573,919) 729,953 1,573 759,011 755,277 3 7,100 (3,008) 3,006 (26,439) (692) 91 913 17,282 6,455 (1,850) (1,797) 732,587 158,668 10,934 493 (16,558) (51,898) 1,184 347 6,712 (77) 760,369 15,741 1,728 1,020 (11,605) (2,601) 3,796 697,397 (64,704) 62,875 1,405,807 1,545 9,482 32,960 64,212 (229,530) 76,796 (1,674) (3,418) 40,268 1,959 90 111 (1,129,554) (354,472) 79,264 1,542,470 29,553 (271,464) (44,485) (100,308) 19,599 24,623 1,256,709 711,228 (2,244,241) (271) 2,058 (1,922) (1,719) (1,940) (13,306) 1,940 24,869 (9,708) 64,451 1,405,807 1,545 9,482 32,960 71,534 (219,546) 76,796 (1,674) (412) 40,268 (78,300) (17,695) 202 (1,129,554) (354,472) 79,264 1,542,470 30,601 (259,756) (47,695) (79,890) 19,599 16,837 (2,244,240) 1,202,822 (192,030) 628,903 89,643 (15,530) 450,008 (208,181) (524,083) (208,143) (249,603) (51,539) 14,226 27,318 426,666 717,578 (940,000) (42,971) (310) 14,943 47 5,998 (44,471) (18,544) (71,438) (29,024) (17) (163,494) 1,172 2 $1,174 (4,135,171) (8,023) (38,913) 1,617,381 114,248 75,101 3,590,131 52,294 1,065,164 328,170 (72,675) (1,364) (69,330) 25,300 149,900 191,484 (191,484) (741,795) 2,470,000 (4,193,290) (59,562) (38,913) 1,631,607 141,566 75,101 3,825,313 52,294 1,053,747 328,170 (72,675) (1,364) (69,640) 40,243 149,947 (940,000) 12,800 (590,000) 42,971 (955,530) (84,221) 2,484,032 1,204,122 2,654,401 (2,058,240) 432,642 (1,625,598) (964,027) (721,059) (14,197) 60,000 (188,125) 590,000 (3,295,648) (100,388) 777,994 $677,606 89,680 741,795 188,125 3,944 (2,470,000) (918,818) 2,392 (813,077) 60,675 (71,438) (25,080) (17) (1,013,814) (3,390,961) (1,722) (766) (107,657) 784,987 ($2,488) $677,330 200 (798,880) 675 940,000 141,995 (6,930) 7,668 $738 940,000 940,000 211 89 $300 207 POPULAR, INC. 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment Provision for loan losses Goodwill and trademark impairment losses Impairment losses on long-lived assets Amortization of intangibles Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights Net loss (gain) on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities FDIC deposit insurance expense Losses from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and adjustments on loans held-for-sale Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums and deferred fees Fair value adjustment of other assets held for sale Losses (earnings) from investments under the equity method Stock options expense Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale Net decrease in trading securities Net decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable Net (increase) decrease in other assets Net decrease in interest payable Deferred income taxes Net increase in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net (increase) decrease in money market investments Purchases of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity Other Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale Proceeds from sale of other investment securities Net (disbursements) repayments on loans Proceeds from sale of loans Acquisition of loan portfolios Capital contribution to subsidiary Mortgage servicing rights purchased Acquisition of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets Popular, Inc. Holding Co. PIBI Holding Co. Year ended December 31, 2008 All other subsidiaries and eliminations PNA Holding Co. Elimination Entries Popular, Inc. Consolidated ($1,243,903) ($1,488,446) ($1,503,782) ($1,163,117) $4,155,345 ($1,243,903) 1,432,356 2,321 40 1,493,072 1,412,867 3 9,147 57 (1,791) 110 412 642 (585) (1,982) (444) 9,511 1,440,647 196,744 (11,845) 4,546 (412) 5,245 1 1,495,208 6,762 (1,383) 7,067 (15,934) 12,962 (26,835) 1,393,293 (110,489) 70,764 1,010,335 12,480 17,445 11,509 52,174 (73,443) 15,037 198,880 (25,961) 83,056 74,170 120,789 26 687 (2,302,189) (431,789) 1,492,870 1,754,419 59,787 84,445 (39,665) 366,733 1,002 (41,890) 2,511,671 1,348,554 (4,338,295) (1,753) (319) 825 (25,136) (825) 475 25,630 (4,339,398) (184,053) 73,088 1,010,375 12,480 17,445 11,509 52,174 (64,296) 15,037 198,880 (25,904) 83,056 72,379 120,789 (8,916) 1,099 (2,302,189) (431,789) 1,492,870 1,754,100 59,459 71,036 (58,406) 379,726 1,002 (33,583) 2,501,421 1,257,518 (43,294) (40,314) (550,095) 237,491 608,270 212,058 (188,673) (605,079) 801,500 (1,301,944) (181) 8,296 25,150 2,054,214 (251,512) (250,000) (246,800) (664) (3,887,030) (4,481,090) (193,820) 2,491,732 4,476,373 192,588 2,437,214 49,489 (991,266) 2,426,491 (4,505) (42,331) (145,476) 60,058 166,683 2,792,601 (4,075,884) (5,086,169) (193,820) 2,491,732 5,277,873 192,588 2,445,510 49,489 (1,093,437) 2,426,491 (4,505) (42,331) (146,140) 60,058 166,683 (879,591) 748,312 476,991 2,680,196 Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (1,589,666) (257,049) 1,257,319 Cash flows from financing activities: Net decrease in deposits Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase Net decrease in other short-term borrowings Payments of notes payable Proceeds from issuance of notes payable Dividends paid Proceeds from issuance of common stock Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and associated warrants Treasury stock acquired Capital contribution from parent Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of period Cash and due from banks at end of period 44,471 (122,232) (61,152) 380,297 (188,644) 17,712 1,321,142 (61) 1,391,533 (1,389) 1,391 $2 250,000 250,000 (287) 376 $89 (117,692) (6,473) (1,273,568) 8,171 250,000 (1,139,562) 7,268 400 $7,668 (164,957) (589,220) (754,177) (1,794,455) (892,692) (2,069,253) 671,630 (179,900) (300) 248,311 (4,181,616) (40,461) 818,455 $777,994 (17,980) (475,648) 1,387,559 (32,000) 179,900 3,793 (748,311) (291,907) 1,031 (1,797) ($766) (1,885,656) (1,497,045) (2,016,414) 1,028,098 (188,644) 17,712 1,324,935 (361) (3,971,552) (33,838) 818,825 $784,987 (This page intentionally left blank) P.O. Box 362708 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-2708

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above