Pro-Dex
Annual Report 2016

Plain-text annual report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ______________ to ______________ Commission File Number 000-14942 PRO-DEX, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Colorado (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 2361 McGaw Avenue, Irvine, CA (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 84-1261240 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 92614 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 769-3200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Common Stock, no par value Name of each exchange on which registered NASDAQ Capital Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company) ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ As of December 31, 2015, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing sales price on the Nasdaq Capital Market was approximately $5.9 million. For the purpose of this calculation shares owned by officers, directors and 10% stockholders known to the registrant have been deemed to be owned by affiliates. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons are affiliates for any other purposes. As of September 2, 2016, 4,063,837 shares of the registrant’s no par value common stock were outstanding. Part III of this report incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates. Documents incorporated by reference: PRO-DEX, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS BUSINESS RISK FACTORS UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS PROPERTIES LEGAL PROCEEDINGS MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES OTHER INFORMATION DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES PART I PART II PART III PART IV ITEM 1. ITEM 1A. ITEM 1B. ITEM 2. ITEM 3. ITEM 4. ITEM 5. ITEM 6. ITEM 7. ITEM 7A. ITEM 8. ITEM 9. ITEM 9A. ITEM 9B. ITEM 10. ITEM 11. ITEM 12. ITEM 13. ITEM 14. ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES Page 1 1 6 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 23 24 50 50 50 51 51 51 51 51 51 52 52  Table of Contents CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS PART I This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead reflect the Company’s expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events. These statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “intent,” “belief,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast,” “plan,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or similar words or phrases. These statements are not guarantees of performance and are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or indicated by those statements. The Company cannot assure you that any of its expectations, estimates or projections will be achieved. Forward-looking statements included in this report are only made as of the date of this report and the Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Numerous factors could cause the Company’s actual results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: loss of a significant customer, entry of new and stronger competitors, capital availability, unexpected costs, compliance with contractual obligations, failure to capitalize upon access to new customers, marketplace delisting, the ramifications of industry consolidation of medical products manufacturers, dealers and distributors, managed health care, market acceptance and support of new products, cancellation of existing contracts, customer “in house” production of products previously designed by and/or acquired from the Company, maintaining favorable supplier relationships, the Company’s ability to engage qualified human resources as needed, regulatory compliance, general economic conditions and other factors described under Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this report. This list of factors is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. All forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. ITEM 1. BUSINESS Company Overview Pro-Dex, Inc. (“Company”, “Pro-Dex”, “we”, “our”, “us”), with operations in California and Oregon, designs and produces powered surgical and dental instruments and motion control products used in the medical, factory automation and scientific research industries. Our products are found in hospitals, dental offices, medical engineering labs, scientific research facilities and high-tech manufacturing operations around the world. In addition to our principal operations described above, our Fineline Molds division, located in San Dimas, California manufactures plastic injection molds for a wide variety of industries. We also provide engineering consulting and placement services to a wide range of industries through our Engineering Services Division. In addition to Pro-Dex, the names Micro Motors and Oregon Micro Systems are used for marketing purposes as brand names. The names Huber Precision, a division of Pro-Dex, and Fineline Molds, a division of Pro-Dex, are used to distinguish our acquired businesses and we have filed fictitious name statements in the counties in which we operate these divisions. Our Huber Precision division was located in San Carlos, California through November 30, 2015 and after such time we manufacture and ship orders placed from these customers directly from our Irvine, California location. Our principal headquarters are located at 2361 McGaw Avenue, Irvine, California 92614 and our phone number is 949-769-3200. Our Internet address is www.pro-dex.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and certain other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. In addition, our Code of Ethics and other corporate governance documents may be found on our website at the Internet address set forth above. Our filings with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1- 800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov and company specific information at www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. 1  Table of Contents During fiscal 2015, we obtained title to an industrial property located in Ramsey, Minnesota (the “Ramsey Property”) and extended financing to a company, Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. (“Riverside”), that operated out of the Ramsey Property. Our investment was made through our limited liability company, Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC to achieve a return on capital upon liquidation or upon foreclosure of the Riverside assets. The investments in the Ramsey Property and Riverside assets were sold during fiscal 2016. (See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional information concerning this investment.) The income from discontinued operations included in our fiscal 2015 Consolidated Statement of Operations relates to the final earn out provisions from our sale of Pro-Dex Astromec, which we sold in February 2012. All years relating to financial data herein shall refer to fiscal years ended June 30, unless indicated otherwise. Description of Business The majority of our revenue is derived from designing, developing and manufacturing powered instruments for the medical and dental industries and motion control software and hardware for industrial and scientific applications. The proportion of total sales by customer type is as follows: Medical device and services Industrial and scientific Dental and component Repairs Other Total Sales Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 (In thousands) % of Revenue % of Revenue $ $ 14,292 1,658 1,320 833 2,055 20,158 71% $ 8% 7% 4% 10% 100% $ 7,619 2,052 1,538 1,779 395 13,383 57% 15% 12% 13% 3% 100% Our medical device products utilize proprietary designs developed by us primarily under exclusive development and supply agreements and are manufactured in our Irvine, California facility, as are our dental products. Our medical device products are sold primarily to original equipment manufacturers and our dental products are sold primarily to dental product distributors. In our Beaverton, Oregon facility, we design and manufacture embedded multi-axis motion controllers which are sold to distributors or original equipment manufacturers in the automation and research industries. In our San Dimas, California facility we manufacture plastic injection molds for a wide variety of industries. The proportion of total sales by facility is as follows: Irvine Beaverton San Dimas Total Sales Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 (In thousands) % of Revenue 89% $ 5% 6% 100% $ 11,732 1,394 257 13,383 % of Revenue 88% 10% 2% 100% $ $ 17,888 969 1,301 20,158 2  Table of Contents In fiscal year 2016, our top 20 customers accounted for 87% of our sales compared to 82% in fiscal year 2015. In fiscal 2016, we had three customers, all included in medical device revenue above, that each accounted for more than 10% of sales and cumulatively totaled 56% of sales. This compares to fiscal year 2015, when our largest customer, included in medical device revenue above, accounted for 49% of our sales with our next largest customer accounting for 9% of our sales. In many cases, including our largest customers, disclosure of customer names is prohibited by confidentiality agreements with such entities. We have no plans to discontinue the sales relationships with our existing significant customers. Our largest customer in fiscal 2015 and previous years has informed us that they will be replacing a primary product that we sell with one that they will manufacture in the future. Therefore, although we expect to continue to have sales to this customer in fiscal 2017, we expect revenue to this customer to continue to decline. This customer accounted for $3.6 million or 18% of revenue in fiscal 2016 compared to $6.6 million or 49% of revenue in fiscal 2015. Our current objectives are focused primarily on maintaining our relationships with our current customers, continuing our cost reduction analysis of our new products and expanding our business with new product launches and services related to our areas of expertise. In that regard, we have completed two significant medical device development projects in the craniomaxillofacial (“CMF”) surgical segment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 and the second quarter of fiscal 2016. However, there can be no assurance as to the level of success we will achieve in these objectives. The majority of the raw materials and components used to manufacture our products are purchased and are available from several sources, including through our own in-house machining capabilities. Portescap Danaher, K-V Engineering, and Fischer Connectors are examples of key suppliers. We have no exclusive arrangements with any of our suppliers, but in several instances only one supplier is used for certain high-value components. In most of such instances, secondary suppliers have been identified, although it is likely that any transition to a new or different supplier would result in a delay in the supply chain. We consider our relationships with our suppliers and manufacturers to be good. We do not intend to terminate any such relationship at this time, nor does management have knowledge that any supplier or manufacturer intends to terminate its relationship with us. Our commitment to product design, manufacturing and quality systems are supported by our compliance with several regulatory agency requirements and standards. We hold a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Establishment Registration and a State of California Device Manufacturing License (Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch) with respect to our Irvine, California facility. In addition, our Irvine, California facility is certified to ISO 13485:2003, Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC – Annex II, and Canadian Medical Device Conformity Assessment System. Our Beaverton, Oregon facility is certified to ISO 9001:2008. At June 30, 2016, we had a backlog of $11.3 million compared with a backlog of $10.6 million at June 30, 2015. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, variability in our new order bookings due to, among other reasons, the launch of new products, the timing of customer orders based on end-user demand and customer inventory levels. We do not typically experience seasonal fluctuations in our shipments and revenues. Segments In fiscal 2016, we had four reportable segments based on our business activities and organization: · · Pro-Dex located in Irvine, California – providing primarily medical and dental instruments using shared production and assembly machines and workforce. This segment also incorporates Huber Precision as the revenues and assets of Huber Precision are not material to our total revenues and assets. Additionally, effective November 30, 2015 the former San Carlos office of Huber Precision was closed and all orders shipped since that date are manufactured at our Irvine facility. OMS located in Beaverton, Oregon – providing multi-axis motion control applications. 3  Table of Contents · · Fineline located in San Dimas, California. This business was purchased on February 1, 2015 and is a manufacturer of plastic injection molds for a variety of industries. Engineering Services Division or (“ESD”). This division was launched in fiscal 2015 to provide permanent placement and contract services in the fields of engineering, manufacturing and quality to diverse businesses. (See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional information concerning these reporting segments.) Competition The markets for products in the industries served by our customers are intensely competitive, and we face significant competition from a number of different sources. Several of our competitors have significantly greater name recognition, as well as substantially greater financial, technical, product development and marketing resources, than us. We compete in all of our markets with other major medical device and motion control related companies. As a provider of outsourced services, we also compete with our customers’ own internal development and manufacturing groups. Competitive pressures and other factors, such as new product or new technology introductions by us, our customers’ internal development and manufacturing departments, or our competitors, may result in price or market share erosion that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Also, there can be no assurance that our products and services will achieve broad market acceptance or will successfully compete with other products targeting the same customers. Research and Development We conduct research and development activities to both maintain and improve our market position. Our research and development effort involves the design and manufacture of products that perform specific applications for our existing and prospective customers. Our research and development activities are focused on: · · · expanding our knowledge base in the medical device and motion control industries to solidify our products with current customers and expand our customer base; advancing applicable technologies; and enhancing our product lines. In certain instances we may share research and development costs with our customers by billing for non-recurring engineering services. Revenue recognized for non-recurring engineering services represented 5% and 4% of our revenue in fiscal year 2016 and 2015, respectively. During recent years, we have entered into certain development and supply contracts, the development portions of which provide for billable non-recurring engineering service fees. Such fees are recognized as revenue generally upon successful completion of the non-recurring engineering services. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we completed the development portion of a contract entered into during fiscal 2012, allowing us to record approximately $336,000 in non-recurring engineering service revenue, included in medical device revenue. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016 we completed the development portion of a contract entered into during fiscal 2013 allowing us to record approximately $660,000 in non-recurring engineering service revenue, also included in medical device and services revenue. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we executed a development agreement with another customer to design and develop a powered surgical device and during fiscal 2016 we recognized medical device service revenue in the amount of approximately $367,000 relating to this contract. We will continue to pursue other revenue-generating development projects. Accordingly, we believe that non-recurring engineering fees could represent a greater share of our revenue in the future. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we incurred research and development expenses amounting to $1,852,000 and $1,668,000, respectively, which costs exclude $412,000 and $493,000 in 2016 and 2015 respectively, that were, or will be, shared with our customers through billings for non-recurring engineering services. 4  Table of Contents Employees At June 30, 2016, we had 76 full-time employees comprised of 60 employees in Irvine, California 9 in Beaverton, Oregon 6 in San Dimas, California and 1 in Boston, Massachusetts, as well as 28 temporary employees, 16 of whom are working on an ESD contract in New Jersey and the balance are working in Irvine, California. At June 30, 2015, we had 66 full-time employees, comprised of 54 employees in Irvine, 7 in Beaverton and 5 in San Dimas. None of our employees are a party to any collective bargaining agreements with us. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good. Government Regulations The manufacture and distribution of medical and dental devices are subject to state and federal requirements set forth by various agencies, including the FDA, and state medical and dental boards. The statutes, regulations, administrative orders, and advisories that affect our businesses are complex and subject to diverse, often conflicting, interpretations. While we make every effort to maintain full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, we are unable to eliminate the ongoing risk that one or more of our activities or devices may at some point be determined to be non-compliant. The penalties for non- compliance could range from an administrative warning to termination of a portion of our business. Furthermore, even if we are subsequently determined to have fully complied with applicable laws or regulations, the costs to achieve such a determination and the intervening loss of business could adversely affect or result in the cessation of a portion of our business. A change in such laws or regulations at any time may have an adverse effect on our operations. The FDA designates all medical devices into one of three classes (Class I, II or III) based on the level of control necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the device (with Class I requiring the lowest level of control and Class III requiring the greatest level of control). The surgical instrumentation we manufacture is generally classified into Class I, and our dental instrumentation is generally classified into Class II. The FDA has broad enforcement powers to recall and prohibit the sale of products that do not comply with federal regulations, and to order the cessation of non-compliant processes. No claim has been made to date by the FDA regarding any of our products or processes. Nevertheless, as is common in the industry, certain of our products and processes have been the subject of routine governmental reviews and investigations. The total cost of providing health care services has been and will continue to be subject to review by governmental agencies and legislative bodies in the major world markets, including the United States, which are faced with significant pressure to lower health care costs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law in March 2010 (the “Affordable Care Act”) imposes a 2.3% excise tax, currently suspended until December 31, 2017, on sales of certain medical devices, some of which we produce, that we may be unable to recover through price increases to our customers. We believe that our business is conducted in a manner consistent with Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and other agency regulations governing disposition of industrial waste materials. While we believe that our products and processes fully comply with applicable laws and regulations, we are unable to predict the outcome of any investigation or review which may be undertaken in the future with respect to our products or processes. Management believes that each of our facilities has manufacturing systems and processes that are based on established Quality Management System standards. In addition, we believe that our Irvine, California facility is compliant with applicable Good Manufacturing Practices promulgated by the FDA, and is, along with our Beaverton, Oregon facility, compliant with applicable ISO standards set forth by the International Organization for Standardization. Patents, Trademarks and Licensing Agreements We hold patents relating to miniature rotary drive products, multi-axis motion controllers and torque-limiting screwdrivers. Our patents have varying expiration dates. The near term expiration of the patents, if any, is not expected to cause any change in our revenue-generating operations as the revenue from the products associated with those patents is not material. We have no reason to believe that our activities infringe upon the intellectual property of any third party. With respect to our own patents, we have no reason to believe that our patents are invalid and we believe that at least some of our patents cover certain aspects of our products. While we are unaware of any reason that would cause us to assert or defend a claim of patent infringement, any such assertion or defense could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations due to the costs involved. 5  Table of Contents We have certain federally registered trademarks relating to our products, including Pro-Dex® OMS® and OMS-EZ®, along with a number of other common law trademarks. We have not entered into any franchising agreements. We have not granted nor do we hold any third-party licenses having terms under which we earn revenue or incur expense in material amounts. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this report, before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects would suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline and you might lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that we currently do not know about or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our operations and business results. A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from a few customers. If we were to lose a key customer, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In fiscal year 2016, our top 20 customers accounted for 87% of our sales, with our largest customer accounting for 25% of our sales. The loss of any of our significant customers, would severely impact us, including having a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, revenue and results of operations. As previously discussed, our former largest customer has informed us that they will be replacing a primary product that we sell with one that they will manufacture in the future. Therefore, although we expect to continue to have sales to this customer in fiscal 2017, we expect revenue to this customer to continue to decline. A substantial portion of our business is derived from our core business area that, if not serviced properly, may result in a material adverse impact upon our business, results of operations and financial condition. In fiscal year 2016, we derived more than 70% of our revenue from sales of our medical device products and related services. We believe that a primary factor in the market acceptance of our products and services is the value they create for our customers. Our future financial performance will depend in large part on our ability to continue to meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers through the timely development, successful introduction and implementation of new and enhanced products and services, while at the same time continuing to provide the value our customers have come to expect from us. We have historically expended a significant percentage of our revenue on product development and believe that significant continued product development efforts will be required to sustain our growth. Continued investment in our sales and marketing efforts will also be required to support future growth. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our product development efforts, that the market will continue to accept our existing products, or that new products or product enhancements will be developed and implemented in a timely manner, meet the requirements of our customers, or achieve market acceptance. If the market does not continue to accept our existing products, or our new products or product enhancements do not achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our customers may cancel or reduce their orders, change production quantities or delay production, any of which would reduce our sales and adversely affect our operating results. Since most of our customers purchase our products from us on a purchase order basis, they may cancel, change, or delay product purchase commitments with little notice to us. As a result, we are not always able to forecast with certainty the sales that we will make in a given period and sometimes we may increase our inventory, working capital, and overhead in expectation of orders that may never be placed, or, if placed, may be delayed, reduced, or canceled. 6  Table of Contents The following factors, among others, affect our ability to forecast accurately our sales and production capacity: · · Changes in the specific products or quantities our customers order; and Long lead times and advance financial commitments for components required to complete actual/anticipated customer orders. Delayed, reduced or canceled purchase orders also may result in our inability to recover costs that we incur in anticipation of those orders, such as costs associated with purchased raw materials and write-offs of obsolete inventory. In recent years, we have launched many new medical device products and our estimates of warranty claims are based largely on our previous history from similar legacy products and if actual warranty claims exceed our estimates, it could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We have recently completed two significant medical device development projects in the craniomaxillofacial (“CMF”) surgical segment as well as a surgical handpiece used for orthopedic applications for which we have made estimates of product warranty claims based upon similar, legacy products. If the actual repair volumes or repair costs exceed the estimates that we have been using, we may incur additional costs which could be materially adverse to our results of operations and financial condition. We face significant competition from a number of different sources, which could negatively impact our results of operations and business conditions. The markets for products in the industries served by our customers are intensely competitive, and we face significant competition from a number of different sources. Several of our competitors have significantly greater name recognition, as well as substantially greater financial, technical, product development and marketing resources, than us. We compete in all of our markets with other major surgical device and motion control related companies. As a provider of outsourced products and services, we also compete with our customers’ own internal development groups. Competitive pressures and other factors, such as new product or new technology introductions by us, our customers’ internal development and manufacturing departments, or our competitors may result in price or market share erosion that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Also, there can be no assurance that our products and services will achieve broad market acceptance or will successfully compete with other products. The industry in which we operate is subject to significant technological change and any failure or delay in addressing such change could adversely affect our competitive position or could make our current products obsolete. The medical device and motion control markets are generally characterized by rapid technological change, changing customer needs, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products incorporating new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing and marketing new products that respond to technological changes or evolving industry standards. New product development requires significant research and development expenditures that we have historically funded through operations; however we may be unable to do so in the future. Any significant decrease in revenues or research funding could impair our ability to respond to technological advances in the marketplace and to remain competitive. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Although we continue to target new markets for access, develop new products and update existing products, there can be no assurance that we will do so successfully or that even if we are successful, such efforts will be completed concurrently with or prior to the introduction of competing products. Any such failure or delay could adversely affect our competitive position or could make our current products obsolete. 7  Table of Contents We rely heavily on our proprietary technology, which, if not properly protected or if deemed invalid, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are dependent on the maintenance and protection of our proprietary technology and rely on patent filings, exclusive development and supply agreements, confidentiality procedures and employee nondisclosure agreements to protect it. There can be no assurance that the legal protections and precautions taken by us will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology or that competitors will not independently develop technologies equivalent or superior to ours. Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States and are often not enforced as vigorously as those in the United States. We do not believe that our operations or products infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. However, there can be no assurance that others will not assert infringement or trade secret claims against us with respect to our current or future products. Assertions or claims by others, whether or not valid, could cause us to incur significant legal costs defending our intellectual property rights and potentially require us to enter into a license agreement or royalty arrangement with the party asserting the claim or to cease our use of the infringing technology, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Two of our directors hold voting power with respect to a substantial portion of our outstanding common stock that enables them to have significant influence over the outcome of all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, which influence may conflict with our interests and the interests of other shareholders. As of August 31, 2016, two of our directors, Nicholas J. Swenson and Raymond E. Cabillot, controlled voting power over approximately 41.8% (27.9% and 13.9%, respectively) of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result of such voting control, these directors will have significant influence over all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election of our directors and other corporate actions, and may have interests that conflict with our interests and the interests of other shareholders. We may not be able to successfully integrate our business acquisitions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We have acquired, and may acquire in the future, businesses, products, and technologies that complement or expand our current operations. Acquisitions could require significant capital investments and require us to integrate with companies that have different cultures, management teams, and business infrastructure. Depending on the size and complexity of an acquisition, our successful integration of the acquisition could depend on several factors, including: Difficulties in assimilating and integrating the operations, products, and workforce of an acquired business; The retention of key employees; · · · Management of facilities and employees in separate geographic areas; · · · The integration or coordination of different research and development and product manufacturing facilities; Successfully converting information and accounting systems, and Diversion of resources and management attention from our other operations. If market conditions or other factors require us to change our strategic direction, we may fail to realize the expected value from one or more of our acquisitions. Our failure to successfully integrate our acquisitions or realize the expected value from past or future acquisitions could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our quarterly results can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, which may negatively impact the price of our shares and/or cause significant variances in the prices at which our shares trade. Our sales have fluctuated in the past, and may fluctuate in the future from quarter to quarter and period to period, as a result of a number of factors including, without limitation: the size and timing of orders from customers; the length of new product development cycles; market acceptance of new technologies; changes in pricing policies or price reductions by us or our competitors; the timing of new product announcements and product introductions by us or our competitors; the financial stability of major customers; our success in expanding our sales and marketing programs; acceleration, deferral, or cancellation of customer orders and deliveries; changes in our strategy; revenue recognition policies in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”); personnel changes; and general market and economic factors. 8  Table of Contents Because a significant percentage of our expenses are fixed, a variation in the timing of sales can cause significant fluctuations in operating results from quarter to quarter. As a result, we believe that interim period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. Further, our historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of future performance for any particular period. In addition, it is possible that our operating results in future quarters may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such an event, the price of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Our operations are subject to a number of complex government regulations, the violation of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The manufacture and distribution of medical and dental devices are subject to state and federal requirements set forth by various government agencies including the FDA and EPA. The statutes, regulations, administrative orders, and advisories that affect our businesses are complex and subject to diverse, often conflicting, interpretations. While we make every effort to maintain full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, we are unable to eliminate the ongoing risk that one or more of our activities may at some point be determined to be non-compliant. The penalties for non-compliance could range from an administrative warning to termination of a portion of our business. Furthermore, even if we are subsequently determined to have fully complied with applicable laws or regulations, the costs to achieve such a determination and the intervening loss of business could adversely affect or result in the cessation of a portion of our business. A change in such laws or regulations at any time may have an adverse effect on our operations. The FDA designates all medical devices into one of three classes (Class I, II or III) based on the level of control necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the device (with Class I requiring the lowest level of control and Class III requiring the greatest level of control). The surgical instrumentation we manufacture is generally classified into Class I, and our dental instrumentation is generally classified into Class II. The FDA has broad enforcement powers to recall and prohibit the sale of products that do not comply with federal regulations, and to order the cessation of non-compliant processes. No claim has been made to date by the FDA regarding any of our products or processes. Nevertheless, as is common in the industry, certain of our products and processes are from time to time subject to routine governmental reviews and investigations. We are also subject to EPA regulations concerning the disposal of industrial waste. While management believes that our products and processes fully comply with applicable laws and regulations, we are unable to predict the outcome of any such future review or investigation. We face increased costs in the healthcare industry due to government reform. Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes. The Affordable Care Act enacted sweeping reforms to the U.S. healthcare industry, including mandatory health insurance, reforms to Medicare and Medicaid, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, new taxes on medical equipment manufacturers, currently suspended through 2017, that apply to certain of our products and other significant modifications to the healthcare delivery system. The global economic environment may impact our business, operating results or financial condition. Changes in the global economic environment have caused, and may cause in the future, a general tightening in the credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increases in rates of default and bankruptcy, and extreme volatility in credit, equity and fixed income markets. These macroeconomic developments could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition should they cause, for example, current or potential customers to become unable to fund purchases of our products, in turn resulting in delays, decreases or cancellations of purchases of our products and services, or causing the customer to not pay us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services. In addition, financial institution failures may cause us to incur increased expenses or make it more difficult either to obtain financing for our operations, investing activities (including the financing of any future acquisitions), or financing activities. Additional economic risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. 9  Table of Contents We face risks and uncertainties associated with potential litigation by or against us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We continually face the possibility of litigation as either a plaintiff or a defendant. It is not reasonably possible to estimate the awards or damages, or the range of awards or damages, if any, that we might incur in connection with such litigation. Many of our products are complex and technologically advanced. Such products may, from time to time, be the subject of claims concerning product performance and construction, including warranty claims. While we are committed to correcting such problems as soon as possible, there is no assurance that solutions will be found on a timely basis, if at all, to satisfy customer demands or to avoid potential claims or litigation. Also, due to the location of our facilities, as well as the nature of our business activities, there is a risk that we could be subject to litigation related to environmental remediation claims. We maintain insurance to protect against claims associated with the manufacture and use of our products, but there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will adequately cover any claim asserted against us. The uncertainty associated with potential litigation may have an adverse impact on our business. In particular, litigation could impair our relationships with existing customers and our ability to obtain new customers. Defending or prosecuting litigation could result in significant legal costs and a diversion of management’s time and attention away from business operations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that litigation would not result in liability in excess of our insurance coverage, that our insurance will cover such claims or that appropriate insurance will continue to be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates. Our operations are dependent upon our key personnel. If such personnel were to leave unexpectedly, we may not be able to execute our business plan. Our future performance depends in significant part upon the continued service of our key technical and senior management personnel. Because we have a relatively small number of employees when compared to other companies in the same industry, our dependence on maintaining our relationship with key employees is particularly significant. We are also dependent on our ability to attract and retain high quality personnel, particularly in the areas of product development, operations management, marketing and finance. A high level of employee mobility and the aggressive recruiting of skilled personnel characterize the medical device and motion control industries. There can be no assurance that our current employees will continue to work for us. Loss of services of key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may need to provide enhanced forms of incentive compensation to attract and retain such key personnel. We have experienced losses in the past, and we cannot be certain that we will sustain our current profitability; we may need additional capital in the future to fund our businesses, which we may not be able to obtain on acceptable terms. We have experienced operating losses in the past. Although we were profitable in fiscal 2016, we incurred pre-tax losses from continuing operations of $446,000, $755,000, and $1,903,000 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our ability to achieve or sustain profitability is based on a number of factors, many of which are out of our control, including the material costs for our products and the demand for our products. We currently anticipate that our available capital resources, including our existing cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable balances will be sufficient to meet our expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements as our business is currently conducted for at least the next 12 months. We may also attempt to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings if such financings become available on acceptable terms. We cannot be certain that any additional financing we may need will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of opportunities, develop new products or otherwise respond to competitive pressures, and our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. 10  Table of Contents We are subject to changes in and interpretations of financial accounting matters that govern the measurement of our performance, compliance with which could be costly and time consuming. We are subject to changes in and interpretations of financial accounting standards that govern the measurement of our performance. Based on our reading and interpretations of relevant pronouncements, guidance, or concepts issued by, among other authorities, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, management believes our performance, including current sales contract terms and business arrangements, has been properly reported. However, there continue to be issued pronouncements, interpretations and guidance for applying the relevant standards to a wide range of contract terms and business arrangements that are prevalent in the industries in which we operate. Future interpretations or changes by the regulators of existing accounting standards or changes in our business practices may result in future changes in our accounting policies and practices that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, revenue and results of operations. Our evaluation of internal controls and remediation of potential problems is costly and time consuming and could expose weaknesses in financial reporting. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, requires management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This process is expensive and time consuming, and requires significant attention of management. Management can give no assurance that material weaknesses in internal controls will not be discovered. If a material weakness is discovered, corrective action may be time consuming and costly, and could further divert the attention of management. The disclosure of a material weakness, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market’s confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price, especially if a restatement of financial statements for past periods is required. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Our executive offices and Irvine manufacturing facility are located at 2361 McGaw Avenue, Irvine, California 92614. We lease the 28,000 square foot facility from an unrelated third party at a current base monthly lease rate of $38,000, with annual increases of $1,400 per month in the base lease rate through the expiration of the lease in April 2018. The building is a one-story stand-alone structure of concrete “tilt-up” construction, approximately 25 years old and in good condition. Our Beaverton office and manufacturing facility is located at 15201 N.W. Greenbrier Parkway, B-1 Ridgeview, Beaverton, Oregon 97006. We executed a first amendment to the lease in the second quarter of fiscal year 2014 reducing the leased premises from 7,500 square feet to 7,100 square feet. The facility is leased from an unrelated third party at a base monthly lease rate of $5,900 through the expiration of the lease in July 2017. The office is located in a single-story building in a 20-year-old industrial office complex and is in good condition. Our San Dimas office and manufacturing facility is located at 210 West Arrow Highway, Suites C & D, San Dimas, California 91773. We executed the lease in the third quarter of fiscal year 2015, in conjunction with the asset acquisition of Fineline Molds. The 3,680 square foot facility is leased from an unrelated third party, at a base monthly lease rate of $2,760 through the expiration of the lease in February 2017. The suites are located in a one-story building in an approximately 35-year-old industrial office complex and are in fair condition. Our former San Carlos office and manufacturing facility was located at 585 Taylor Way, Unit 5, San Carlos, California 94070. The Company executed the lease in the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, in conjunction with the asset acquisition of Huber Precision. The 1,568 square foot facility was leased from an unrelated third party, at a base monthly lease rate of $2,148 through the expiration of the lease in November 2015. The suite was located in a one-story building in an approximately 35-year-old industrial office complex in fair condition. The current leased facilities are believed to be adequate for our expected needs. We believe each facility is in full compliance with applicable state, EPA and other agency environmental standards. 11  Table of Contents ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On August 1, 2016, we received correspondence from an attorney representing Scott Robertson, the former president of Riverside Manufacturing, Inc., claiming damages owed under claims of breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, wrongful self-help eviction among others. The letter requested a payment of $250,000 within 10 days of the date of the letter to fully settle the matter. We have made no such payment nor have we accrued any amounts owed related to this matter. On August 12, 2016, we responded to the letter indicating that we believe each and every claim has no legal merit. Additionally, on September 8, 2016, we sent a follow up correspondence asserting claims against Mr. Robertson including slander of title, fraudulent misrepresentation, conversion and theft. We have proposed a mutual release of all claims to settle this dispute and avoid potentially costly legal fees. As of the date of this filing, no litigation has commenced nor, to our knowledge, is pending. While we believe that we would prevail should this matter escalate, there can be no assurances that we will be successful should this matter be litigated. In addition to the matter described above, we are from time to time a party to various legal proceedings incidental to our business. The legal proceedings potentially cover a variety of allegations spanning our entire business. There can be no certainty, however, that we may not ultimately incur liability or that such liability will not be material and adverse. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 12  Table of Contents PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Information Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “PDEX” on the automated quotation system of the Nasdaq Capital Market (“NASDAQ”). The following table sets forth for the quarters indicated the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ. The quotations reflect inter- dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. On September 8, 2016, the last sale price of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ was $5.64 per share. Year ended June 30, 2016: First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Year ended June 30, 2015: First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Holders High Low $ $ 2.79 $ 2.78 3.82 5.61 2.79 $ 2.63 2.54 2.42 2.00 2.37 2.24 3.32 2.01 2.16 2.03 2.00 As of September 8, 2016, there were 88 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners including holders whose shares are held in nominee, or “street,” name. Dividends We have never paid a cash dividend with respect to our common stock. The current policy of our Board of Directors is to retain any future earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of our business. Any determinations to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Repurchases In September 2013, our Board approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of our common stock. In accordance with, and as part of, this share repurchase program, our Board approved, on March 22, 2016, the adoption of a prearranged share repurchase plan intended to qualify for the safe harbor under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“10b5-1 Plan” or “Plan”). The 10b5-1 Plan became effective on March 23, 2016 and through June 30, 2016 we repurchased 99,688 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $454,000. The 10b5-1 Plan terminated on July 6, 2016 in accordance with its provisions. Our prior 10b5-1 Plan commenced on September 24, 2014 and terminated on March 23, 2015. Through March 23, 2015, we repurchased 69,773 shares at an aggregate cost of $154,000, inclusive of fees, under the terms of the prior 10b5-1 Plan. Repurchases under both 10b5-1 Plans were administered through an independent broker. 13  Table of Contents ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Not applicable. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report as well as the Risk Factors included in Item 1A of this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. (See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included in Part 1 of this report.) Overview The following discussion and analysis provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The income from discontinued operations included in our fiscal year 2015 consolidated statement of operations relates to the final earn out provisions from our sale of Pro-Dex Astromec, which we sold in February 2012. The Company, with operations in California and Oregon, designs and produces powered surgical and dental instruments and motion control products used in the medical, factory automation and scientific research industries. Our products are found in hospitals, dental offices, medical engineering labs, scientific research facilities and high-tech manufacturing operations around the world. In addition to our principal operations described above, our Fineline Molds division, located in San Dimas, California manufactures plastic injection molds for a wide variety of industries. We also provide engineering consulting and placement services to a wide range of industries through our Engineering Services Division. In addition to Pro-Dex, the names Micro Motors and Oregon Micro Systems are used for marketing purposes as brand names. The names Huber Precision, a division of Pro-Dex, and Fineline Molds, a division of Pro-Dex, are used to distinguish our acquired businesses and we have filed fictitious name statements in the counties in which we operate these divisions. Our Huber Precision division was located in San Carlos, California through November 30, 2015 and after such time we manufacture and ship orders placed from these customers directly from our Irvine, California location. Critical Accounting Policies Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Revenue Recognition Revenue on product sales is recognized upon shipment to the customer when risk of loss and title transfer to the customer and all other conditions required by GAAP, as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 605 (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition), have been satisfied. Revenue from billable product development service portions of development and supply contracts is generally recognized either upon milestone completion or completion of the product development services, in conformity with ASC Section 605. We recognize revenue that is contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. A milestone is considered substantive when the consideration payable to us for such milestone (i) is consistent with our performance necessary to achieve the milestone, (ii) relates solely to our past performance and (iii) is reasonable relative to all of the other deliverables and payments within the arrangement. In making this assessment, we consider all facts and circumstances relevant to the arrangement, including factors such as the scientific, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the milestone, the level of effort and investment required to achieve the milestone and whether any portion of the milestone consideration is related to future performance or deliverables. Accordingly, in certain cases, based upon the evaluation of the criteria above, we record revenue upon milestone completion and in other cases revenue from product development milestone billings to our customers is deferred until completion of all development phases or milestones. 14  Table of Contents Returns of our product for credit are minimal; accordingly, we do not establish a reserve for product returns at the time of sale. Estimated Losses on Product Development Services Cost and revenue estimates related to the product development service portions of development and supply contracts are reviewed and updated quarterly. When it is probable that total costs from the development portion of such contracts will exceed product development service revenue, the expected loss is recognized immediately in cost of sales. Owing to the complexity of many of the contracts we have undertaken, the cost estimation process requires significant judgment. It is based upon the knowledge and experience of our project managers, engineers, and finance professionals. Factors that are considered in estimating the cost of work to be completed and ultimate profitability of the fixed price product development portion of development and supply contracts include the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, availability and productivity of labor, the effect of change orders, the availability of materials, performance of subcontractors, and expected costs for specific regulatory approvals. Warranties Certain of our products are sold with a warranty that provides for repairs or replacement of any defective parts for a period, generally one to two years, after the sale. At the time of the sale, we accrue an estimate of the cost of providing the warranty based on prior experience with such factors as return rates and repair costs, which factors are reviewed quarterly. Warranty expenses, including changes of estimates, are included in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of operations. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Reductions to estimated market value are recorded, and charged to cost of sales, when indicated based on a formula that compares on-hand quantities to both historical usage and estimated demand over the ensuing 12 months from the measurement date. Accounts Receivable and Deferred Costs Trade receivables are stated at their original invoice amounts, less an allowance for doubtful portions of such accounts. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on facts and circumstances related to specific accounts, and on historical experience related to the age of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously reserved are offset against the allowance when received. Deferred costs reflect costs incurred related to non-recurring engineering services under the terms of the related development and supply contracts. These costs get recorded to cost of sales in the period that the revenue is recognized pursuant to the terms of the underlying contract with our customer. Long-lived Assets We review the recoverability of long-lived assets, consisting of equipment and leasehold improvements, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate carrying values may not be recoverable. 15  Table of Contents Goodwill & Intangibles We recorded goodwill and a trade name in conjunction with the asset purchase of Fineline Molds during fiscal 2015. We assessed the potential impairment of goodwill and trade name during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and will continue on an annual basis, or more frequently if there are events or changes in circumstances that may indicate potential impairment. Other intangibles consist of legal fees incurred in connection with patent applications, capitalized software development costs, covenant not to compete, and customer lists including backlog. Both the legal fees and the capitalized software development costs will be amortized over the estimated product life of the underlying product related to the associated patent and software development costs. The covenant not to compete and customer list including backlog relate to assets acquired in conjunction with the purchase of Huber Precision and Fineline Molds and will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Business Combinations We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows, useful lives and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the measurement period, which is one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings. Income Taxes We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and tax credit carryovers. Deferred tax assets at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted primarily of basis differences related to research and development tax credit utilization, net operating loss carryovers, intangible assets, accrued expenses and inventories. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and the recoverability of our deferred tax assets. Such determination is based on our historical taxable income, with consideration given to our estimates of future taxable income and the periods over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable. We record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. When we establish or reduce the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. At June 30, 2016 and 2015, we maintained a valuation allowance against the entire balance of our deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities. 16  Table of Contents Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 The following tables set forth results from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Dollars in thousands % of Net Sales % of Net Sales Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Selling expenses General and administrative expenses Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets Research and development costs $ Operating income (loss) Other income, net Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) Net income (loss) from continuing operations $ 20,158 14,755 5,403 898 1,882 245 1,852 4,877 526 321 847 25 822 100% $ 73% 27% 5% 9% 1% 9% 24% 2% 2% 4% — 4% $ 13,383 9,679 3,704 975 1,963 — 1,668 4,606 (902) 456 (446) (44) (402) 100% 72% 28% 7% 15% — 12% 34% (6%) 3% (3%) — (3%) Net Sales The majority of our revenue is derived from designing, developing and manufacturing powered surgical instruments for medical device original equipment manufacturers, dental instruments, and motion control software and hardware for industrial and scientific applications. The proportion of total sales by product/service type is as follows: Net sales: Medical device and services Industrial and scientific Dental and component Repairs Other Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Dollars in thousands % of Net Sales % of Net Sales Increase (Decrease) From 2015 To 2016 $ $ 14,292 1,658 1,320 833 2,055 20,158 71% $ 8% 7% 4% 10% 100% $ 7,619 2,052 1,538 1,779 395 13,383 57% 15% 12% 13% 3% 100% 88% (19%) (14%) (53%) 420% 51% 17  Table of Contents Net sales in fiscal 2016 increased by $6.8 million, or 51%, as compared to fiscal 2015, due primarily to an increase in medical device sales of $6.7 million. During fiscal 2016 we had three customers, all in medical device, that each accounted for more than 10 percent of total revenue compared to only one customer in the medical device space that accounted for more than 10 percent of our total revenue during fiscal 2015. Our two new significant customers reflect the release of new products that we either designed to customer specification or were contracted to manufacture. Sales to these two customers accounted for $7.9 million in revenue during fiscal 2016 compared $467,000 during the prior fiscal year. In the current year, in addition to our surgical handpieces designed to be used in orthopedic surgery applications, we also shipped handpieces for use in CMF surgical applications and have broadened both our customer base and medical device products. We increased sales to three additional medical device customers by $775,000, $520,000, and $349,000, respectively. Offsetting the increases from these customers, sales to our oldest and formerly most significant customer in medical device have decreased by approximately $3.0 million, from $6.6 million to $3.6 million, of which approximately $948,000 relates to repairs, this fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. This customer has informed us that they will be replacing a primary product that we sell with one that they will manufacture in the future. Therefore, although we expect to continue to have sales to this customer in fiscal 2017, we expect revenue to this customer to continue to decline. The decrease of $394,000 in industrial and scientific sales from fiscal 2015 to 2016, relates primarily to reductions of our multi-axis motion control products sales which decreased by $425,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. Our dental and component revenue are generated from sales to many distributors and end-users whose purchasing activity can vary widely from year to year. Our dental and component products are legacy products, which although they continue to sell to many long-held customers, have not had a product line refresh, which may be a contributing factor to the decrease in sales of $218,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to the prior year. Our repair revenue declined $946,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, driven by the reduced sales to our former largest medical device customer, described above. Finally, our other revenue increased $1.7 million in fiscal 2016 compared to the prior fiscal year and it includes revenue generated from our Fineline Molds and Engineering Services Division of $1.3 million and $730,000, respectively, in the current year, representing increases of $1.0 million and $615,000, respectively, compared to fiscal 2015. The $1.0 million increase in sales of Fineline Molds is due in part to fiscal 2016 containing a full year of operations compared to only 5 months in fiscal 2015, as well as a mix of more complex, larger jobs completed in the current year. Of the $615,000 increase in Engineering Services Division revenue, $487,000 relates to a contract for temporary employees in New Jersey as well as various other temporary and direct hire placements. At June 30, 2016, we had a backlog of $11.3 million compared with a backlog of $10.6 million at June 30, 2015. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, variability in our new order bookings due to, among other reasons, the launch of new products, the timing of customer orders based on end-user demand and customer inventory levels. We do not typically experience seasonal fluctuations in our shipments and revenues. Cost of Sales and Gross Margin Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Dollars in thousands % of Net Sales % of Net Sales Increase (Decrease) From 2015 To 2016 Cost of sales: Product costs Accrued losses on product development services Under (over)-absorption of manufacturing $ overhead Inventory and warranty charges Total cost of sales $ 14,869 62 (437) 261 14,755 74% $ — (2%) 1% 73% $ 9,547 399 (483) 216 9,679 71% 3% (4%) 2% 72% 56% (84%) (10%) 21% 52% Cost of sales in fiscal 2016 increased $5.1 million, or 52%, from fiscal 2015, due primarily to a $5.3 million increase in product costs. The increase in product costs is due primarily to the increase in sales from fiscal 2015 to 2016 of 51 percent. Although sales are significantly higher in fiscal 2016 than the prior fiscal year, our gross margin declined from 28 percent in fiscal 2015 to 27 percent in fiscal 2016. Many of our newer products that we began selling in late fiscal 2015 and 2016 have lower margins than our legacy products. Also contributing to the deterioration in our product margin during fiscal 2016 includes expedite fees and outsourcing versus manufacturing of certain components in order to meet delivery expectations for recent product launches. As we continue to manufacture and deliver these products, our operations team can focus on improving margins by continuing to evaluate “make-or-buy” decisions and process improvements. Accrued losses from development services portion of certain contracts decreased $337,000, or 84%, from fiscal 2015 relating to improved project management as well as fewer development contracts in process during fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. Costs related to inventory and warranty charges increased $45,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to 2015 due primarily to $34,000 in increased warranty expenses and an increase of $11,000 in inventory charges. 18  Table of Contents Operating Expenses Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 (Dollars in thousands) % of Net Sales % of Net Sales Increase (Decrease) From 2015 To 2016 Operating expenses: Selling expenses General and administrative expenses Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets Research and development costs $ $ 898 1,882 245 1,852 4,877 5% $ 9% 1% 9% 24% $ 975 1,963 — 1,668 4,606 7% 15% — 12% 34% (8%) (4%) 100% 11% 6% Selling expenses consist of salaries and other personnel-related expenses related to our business development departments, as well as trade show attendance, advertising and marketing expenses, and travel and related costs incurred in generating and maintaining customer relationships. Selling Expenses by division (in thousands except % of total) Selling expenses: Pro-Dex (Irvine) OMS Division (Beaverton) ESD Division (Irvine) Fineline Division (San Dimas) Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 (Dollars in thousands) % of Total $ $ 254 118 325 201 898 28% $ 13% 36% 23% 100% $ 330 126 441 78 975 Increase (Decrease) From 2015 To 2016 (23%) (6%) (26%) 158% (8%) % of Total 34% 13% 45% 8% 100% Selling expenses for Pro-Dex Irvine during the year ended June 30, 2016 decreased $76,000, or 23%, compared to fiscal 2015 mostly due to reductions in personnel costs and trade show costs associated with the sales of our medical, dental and industrial revenue generating activities. The selling expenses for our OMS division remained relatively flat in the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we launched our engineering services division (“ESD”) to recruit and place contract personnel in engineering, manufacturing and other technical consulting capacities. This division includes a team of sales and recruiting staff in our Irvine, California office and previously, a Troy, Michigan office. In an effort to reduce the overall expenses of this division as we focused on revenue growth, we closed the Troy, Michigan office and reduced overall head count of the division, therefore selling expenses for this division decreased $116,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. The increase in the Fineline division is primarily due to the fact that fiscal 2016 contains twelve months of operations compared to 5 months in the prior fiscal year, because we acquired this business on February 1, 2015. In addition, the current fiscal year includes commission expense in the amount of $41,000 with no similar expense included in the prior fiscal year. 19  Table of Contents Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets relates to Fineline as a result of our annual impairment test described more fully in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial statements contained elsewhere in this report. General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) consist of salaries and other personnel-related expenses for corporate, accounting, finance and human resource personnel, as well as costs for outsourced information technology services, professional fees, directors’ fees and costs associated with being a public company. The $81,000 decrease in G&A expenses from fiscal 2015 to 2016 is due primarily to decreased legal and professional fees and non-recurring severance payments made to our former Chief Executive Officer during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2015 we also incurred legal fees relating to services provided in conjunction with our two business acquisitions, the filing our Form S-8 related to our ESPP Plan and legal expenses associated with the separation agreement of our former Chief Executive Officer. Research and development costs consist of salaries and other personnel-related costs of our product development and engineering personnel, related professional and consulting fees, and costs related to intellectual property, laboratory usage, materials, and travel and related costs incurred in the development and support of our products. The increase in research and development costs of $184,000 in fiscal 2016 as compared to 2015 is primarily related to increases in personnel and related expenses as we have grown our engineering team in support of our increased development projects and medical device products. Interest Expense Interest expense consists primarily of interest expense related to the loans and notes payable described more fully in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report. The increase in interest expense for fiscal 2016 relates to the recent financing arrangements described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report. Gain from sale of Investment in Ramsey During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, we sold the Ramsey Property for an aggregate sale price of $1.6 million. Additionally, during the second and third quarter of fiscal 2016 we liquidated the Riverside machine shop equipment and collected some accounts receivable of Riverside that served as collateral to the promissory notes in the gross amount of $529,000. Therefore during the third quarter ended March 31, 2016 we recorded a gain from the sale of the investment in Ramsey in the amount of $340,000. Realized Gain on Sale of Investments During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we liquidated our investment portfolio to fund our working capital requirements. During fiscal 2015, we sold certain of our investments in marketable equity securities of publicly held companies and recorded realized gains of $455,000. We have not purchased, held or disposed of any marketable securities during fiscal 2016. Income Taxes The effective tax rates for fiscal 2016 and 2015 are lower than statutory tax rates primarily due to our utilization of federal and state loss carryforwards, with a full valuation allowance. (See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report). 20  Table of Contents Liquidity and Capital Resources The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Cash and Working Capital: Cash provided by (used in): Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Cash, cash equivalents and working capital: Cash and cash equivalents Working capital Cash Flows from Operating Activities As of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 (In thousands) $ $ $ $ $ 466 1,588 (457) 2,294 7,141 $ $ $ $ $ (775) (1,513) (203) 697 4,714 Cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2016 relates primarily to our operating income of $526,000 and non-cash impairment charge of $245,000 and non-cash depreciation and amortization of $614,000 offset by increases in total accounts receivable, including amounts due from factor, in the amount of $523,000, consistent with our increase in net sales. Additionally, deferred revenue decreased $382,000 and our accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred rent decreased by $1.3 million. Offsetting these uses of cash, our inventory decreased by $737,000 and our deferred costs decreased by $615,000 due to the completion of a product development contract. Cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2015 was $775,000. The primary uses of cash arose from our net loss of $365,000, increases in inventory of $1.7 million to service our backlog of $10.6 million as of June 30, 2015 as well as increases in accounts receivable totaling $554,000, consistent with our increase in net sales during fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. These uses of cash were offset primarily by an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred rent of $1.2 million, an increase in deferred revenue of $362,000 and a decrease in deferred costs of $220,000 caused by the completion of one of our long-term product development contracts. Cash Flows from Investing Activities During fiscal 2016 we sold the Ramsey Property for an aggregate purchase price of $1.6 million realizing cash proceeds from the escrow close in the amount of $1.4 million and liquidated the Riverside machine shop equipment and collected some accounts receivable of Riverside that served as collateral to the promissory notes in the gross amount of $529,000 after investing an additional $87,000. Additionally during fiscal 2016, we made capital expenditures primarily for tooling and manufacturing equipment in the amount of $311,000 and sold fully depreciated equipment for $18,000. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2015 was $1.5 million. During the 2015 fiscal year, we invested $1.7 million in the purchase of notes receivable and the extension of additional revolving credit (secured by Ramsey Property and Riverside assets) as further described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report. We also purchased Huber Precision and Fineline Molds for a total of $866,000, made capital expenditures primarily for tooling and manufacturing equipment in the amount of $244,000 and received $1.3 million in proceeds from the sale of equity securities in conformity with our Surplus Capital Investment Policy described in more detail below. Additionally, we expended $64,000 in capitalized legal fees and software development costs related to internally developed intellectual property. Cash Flows from Financing Activities During fiscal 2016 we borrowed and repaid the principal amount of $1.7 million and $500,000, respectively, from Summit Financial Resources LP and Fortitude Income Funds LLC. Additionally, we spent $454,000 on the repurchase of 99,688 shares of our common stock pursuant to the share repurchase program described in more detail below. 21  Table of Contents During fiscal year 2015 we spent $154,000 on the repurchase of 69,773 shares of our common stock pursuant to the share repurchase program described in more detail below. We also repurchased the outstanding in-the money stock options held by our former Chief Executive Officer for $32,000, pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement. Liquidity Requirements for the Next 12 Months As of June 30, 2016, our working capital was $7.1 million. We currently believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent balances as well as our account receivable balances, including amounts due from factor, will provide us sufficient funds to satisfy our cash requirements as our business is currently conducted for at least the next 12 months. In addition to our cash and cash equivalent balances, we expect to derive a portion of our liquidity from our cash flows from operations. We are focused on preserving our cash balances by monitoring expenses, identifying cost savings, and investing only in those development programs and products that we believe will most likely contribute to our profitability. As we execute on our current strategy, however, we may require debt and/or equity capital to fund our working capital needs and requirements for capital equipment to support our manufacturing and inspection processes. In particular, we have experienced negative operating cash flow in the past, especially as we procure long-lead time materials to satisfy our backlog, which can be subject to extensive variability. We may attempt to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings if such financings become available on acceptable terms, or we may seek working capital financing through the extension of additional credit. We cannot be certain that any additional financing we may need will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of opportunities, develop new products or otherwise respond to competitive pressures, and our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. Surplus Capital Investment Policy During fiscal 2013, our Board approved a Surplus Capital Investment Policy (the “Policy”) that provides, among other items, for the following: (a) Determination by our Board of Directors of (i) our surplus capital balance and (ii) the portion of such surplus capital balance to be invested according to the Policy; (b) Selection of an Investment Committee responsible for implementing the Policy; and (c) Objectives and criteria under which investments may be made. The Investment Committee is comprised of Messrs. Swenson (Chair), Cabillot and Van Kirk. In September 2013, our Board approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of our common stock under parameters to be determined by the Investment Committee. In accordance with, and as part of this share repurchase program, our Board approved, on March 22, 2016, the adoption of a prearranged share repurchase plan intended to qualify for the safe harbor under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“10b5-1 Plan”). The 10b5-1 Plan became effective on March 23, 2016 and through June 30, 2016 we repurchased 99,688 shares at an aggregate cost of $454,000, inclusive of fees. The Plan terminated on July 6, 2016, in accordance with its provisions. Our prior 10b5-1 Plan became effective on September 24, 2014 and terminated on March 23, 2015. Through March 23, 2015, we repurchased 69,773 shares at an aggregate cost of $154,000, inclusive of fees, under the terms of the 10b5-1 Plan. Repurchases under both 10b5-1 Plans were administered through an independent broker. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue depicting the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires enhanced revenue related disclosures. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption of the standard is permitted, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2017. This update permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 22  Table of Contents In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this accounting standard update require debt issuance costs be presented on the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. The amendments in this accounting standard update are to be applied retrospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on our balance sheet. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as any related valuation allowance, to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years and earlier adoption is permitted. We elected early adoption during fiscal 2016 and have netted our current deferred income tax assets against our long term deferred income tax liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, (Topic 842) “Leases”. The objective of this update is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods and is to be applied utilizing a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. This update simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Not applicable. 23  Table of Contents ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 24 Page 25 26 27 28 29 31  Table of Contents The Shareholders and Board of Directors Pro-Dex, Inc. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pro-Dex, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pro-Dex, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Moss Adams LLP Moss Adams LLP Irvine, California September 15, 2016 25  Table of Contents ASSETS Current assets: PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share data) June 30, 2016 2015 Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $20 and $36 at June 30, 2016 and 2015, $ 2,294 $ 697 respectively Due from factor Deferred costs Other current receivables Inventory Prepaid expenses Deferred income taxes Total current assets Plant, equipment and leasehold improvements, net Investment in Ramsey property and related notes receivable Goodwill Intangibles Other assets Total assets LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Deferred revenue Income taxes payable Note payable Capital lease obligations Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities: Deferred income taxes Deferred rent Note payable, net of current portion Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and Contingencies Shareholders’ equity: Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 4,052,987 and 4,139,579 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively Accumulated other comprehensive income Accumulated deficit Total shareholders’ equity Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity See notes to consolidated financial statements. 26 1,469 1,419 238 91 3,573 134 — 9,218 1,286 — 112 451 80 11,147 $ 841 $ 997 212 1 26 — 2,077 — 147 46 193 2,270 17,988 — (9,111) 8,877 11,147 $ 2,326 — 853 28 4,310 124 70 8,408 1,470 1,652 353 547 86 12,516 1,867 1,202 594 — 24 7 3,694 70 204 70 344 4,038 18,411 — (9,933) 8,478 12,516 $ $ $  Table of Contents Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share data) Operating expenses: Selling expenses General and administrative expenses Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets Research and development costs Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Other income (expense): Interest income Realized gain on sale of investments Gain from sale of Investment in Ramsey Property Gain from disposal of equipment Interest expense Total other income Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) Net income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes Net income (loss) Basic and diluted income (loss) per share: Net income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic Diluted See notes to consolidated financial statements. 27 Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 $ 20,158 $ 14,755 5,403 13,383 9,679 3,704 898 1,882 245 1,852 4,877 526 — — 340 18 (37) 321 847 25 822 — 822 $ 0.20 $ — 0.20 $ 975 1,963 — 1,668 4,606 (902) 6 455 — 1 (6) 456 (446) (44) (402) 37 (365) (0.10) 0.01 (0.09) 4,141,353 4,173,556 4,169,326 4,169,326 $ $ $  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY For The Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (In thousands, except share data) Balance at June 30, 2014 Net loss Rights offering costs Repurchase of options Net change in unrealized gain from marketable equity investments Restricted stock forfeitures Share-based compensation Share repurchases Balance at June 30, 2015 Net income Exercise of stock options ESPP shares issued Share-based compensation Share repurchases Balance at June 30, 2016 Common Shares Number of Shares Amount Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Accumulated Deficit Total 4,211,019 $ — — — — (1,667) — (69,773) 4,139,579 $ — 7,500 5,596 — (99,688) 4,052,987 $ 18,582 $ — (2) (32) — — 17 (154) 18,411 $ — 16 11 4 (454) 17,988 $ 202 $ — — — (202) — — — — $ — — — — — — $ (9,568) $ (365) — — — — — — (9,933) $ 822 — — — — (9,111) $ 9,216 (365) (2) (32) (202) — 17 (154) 8,478 822 16 11 4 (454) 8,877 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 28  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: $ 822 $ Depreciation and amortization Realized gain on sale of investments Gain on sale of investment in Ramsey Gain on sale or disposal of equipment Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets Share-based compensation Allowance for doubtful accounts Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, due from factor and other current receivables Deferred costs Inventory Prepaid expenses and other assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred rent Deferred revenue Income taxes receivable and payable Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements Business acquisitions Purchase of notes receivable (See Note 8) Investment in Ramsey property and related notes receivable Proceeds from sale of investment in Ramsey Proceeds from sale of equipment Proceeds from sale of investments Increase in intangibles Purchase of investments Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Principal payments on capital lease and note payable Proceeds from note payable Borrowings from Summit loan Repayments on Summit loan Repurchases of common stock Net proceeds paid related to common stock rights offering Proceeds (payments) from exercise (repurchase) of stock options and ESPP contributions Net cash used in financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ See notes to consolidated financial statements. 29 614 — (340) (18) 245 4 (16) (523) 615 737 (5) (1,288) (382) 1 466 (311) — — (87) 1,992 18 — (24) — 1,588 (530) 500 1,689 (1,689) (454) — 27 (457) 1,597 697 2,294 $ (365) 578 (455) — (1) — 17 7 (554) 220 (1,705) (22) 1,196 362 (53) (775) (244) (866) (1,652) — — 1 1,324 (64) (12) (1,513) (15) — — — (154) (2) (32) (203) (2,491) 3,188 697  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED (In thousands) Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Noncash investing and financing activities: Promissory note issued in conjunction with a business acquisition Exchange of notes receivable for real property Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for income taxes Cash paid for interest See notes to consolidated financial statements. 30 Years Ended June 30, 2015 2016 $ $ $ $ — $ — $ 21 $ 37 $ 100 1,059 7 6  Table of Contents 1. Description of Business PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pro-Dex, Inc. (“Pro-Dex”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) specializes in the design and manufacture of powered surgical and dental instruments and multi-axis motion control systems, and serves such markets as medical, research and industrial. Pro-Dex’s products are found in hospitals, dental offices, medical engineering labs, scientific research facilities and high tech manufacturing operations around the world. During fiscal 2015 we acquired Fineline Molds and Huber Precision, businesses that manufacture plastic injection molds and machined parts, respectively, for a wide variety of industries. We also provide engineering consulting and placement services, as well as quality and regulatory consulting services through our Engineering Services Division. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist the reader in understanding our consolidated financial statements. Such financial statements and related notes are the representations of management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. In the opinion of management, these accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC and Pro- Dex Riverside, LLC, both Delaware limited liability companies formed by the Company in fiscal 2015. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Revenue Recognition Revenue on product sales is recognized upon shipment to the customer when risk of loss and title transfer to the customer and all other conditions required by GAAP, as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 605 (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition), have been satisfied. Revenue from billable product development service portions of development and supply contracts is generally recognized either upon milestone completion or completion of the product development services, in conformity with ASC Section 605. We recognize revenue that is contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. A milestone is considered substantive when the consideration payable to us for such milestone (i) is consistent with our performance necessary to achieve the milestone, (ii) relates solely to our past performance and (iii) is reasonable relative to all of the other deliverables and payments within the arrangement. In making this assessment, we consider all facts and circumstances relevant to the arrangement, including factors such as the scientific, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the milestone, the level of effort and investment required to achieve the milestone and whether any portion of the milestone consideration is related to future performance or deliverables. Accordingly, in certain cases, based upon the evaluation of the criteria above, we record revenue upon milestone completion and in other cases revenue from product development milestone billings to our customers is deferred until completion of all development phases or milestones. Returns of our product for credit are minimal; accordingly, we do not establish a reserve for product returns at the time of sale. Estimated Losses on Product Development Services Cost and revenue estimates related to the product development service portions of development and supply contracts are reviewed and updated quarterly. When it is probable that total costs from the development portion of such contracts will exceed product development service revenue, the expected loss is recognized immediately in cost of sales. Contract costs include all direct material, labor and those indirect costs related to contract performance. 31  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Due to the complexity of many of the contracts we have undertaken, the cost estimation process requires significant judgment. It is based upon the knowledge and experience of our project managers, engineers, and finance professionals. Factors that are considered in estimating the cost of work to be completed and ultimate profitability of the fixed price product development portion of development and supply contracts include, among others, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, availability and productivity of labor, the effect of change orders, the availability of materials, performance of subcontractors, and expected costs for specific regulatory approvals. Warranties Certain of our products are sold with a warranty that provides for repairs or replacement of any defective parts for a period, generally one to two years, after the sale. At the time of the sale, we accrue an estimate of the cost of providing the warranty based on prior experience with such factors as return rates and repair costs, which factors are reviewed quarterly. The warranty accrual is based on historical costs of warranty repairs and expected future identifiable warranty expenses, and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Warranty expenses are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Changes in estimates to previously established warranty accruals result from current period updates to assumptions regarding repair costs and warranty return rates, and are included in current period warranty expense. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2016 cash equivalents consisted of investments in money market funds. At June 30, 2015 there were no cash equivalents included in the cash and cash equivalents balance. Accounts Receivable and Deferred Costs Trade receivables are stated at their original invoice amounts, less an allowance for doubtful portions of such accounts. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on facts and circumstances related to specific accounts and on historical experience related to the age of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously reserved are offset against the allowance when received. Deferred costs reflect costs incurred related to non-recurring engineering services under the terms of the related development and supply contracts. These costs get recorded to cost of sales in the period that the revenue is recognized pursuant to the terms of the underlying contract with our customer. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Reductions to estimated market value are recorded, and charged to cost of sales, when indicated based on a formula that compares on-hand quantities to both historical usage and estimated demand over the ensuing 12 months from the measurement date. Long-lived Assets We review the recoverability of long-lived assets, consisting of plant, equipment and leasehold improvements, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate carrying values may not be recoverable. Plant, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at historical cost and depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the following periods: Equipment Leasehold improvements Three to ten years Shorter of the lease term or the asset’s estimated useful life 32  Table of Contents Goodwill & Intangibles PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We recorded $353,000 of goodwill and $54,000 of trade name in conjunction with the asset purchase of Fineline Molds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Accordingly, subsequent to the measurement period described below under “Business Combinations,” we will assess potential impairment of goodwill and trade name annually, or more frequently if there are events or changes in circumstances that may indicate potential impairment. Intangibles consist of legal fees incurred in connection with patent applications, capitalized software development costs, covenant not to compete, trade name, and customer lists including backlog. Certain of the patent costs are being amortized over a period of seven years, the estimated life of the product that is currently utilizing the patented technology. The remaining patent costs will be amortized over the estimated life of the product(s) that will be utilizing the technology, or expensed immediately in the event the patent office denies the issuance of the patent. The capitalized software development costs have been fully amortized as of June 30, 2016. The covenant not to compete and customer list including backlog relate to assets acquired in conjunction with the purchase of Huber Precision and Fineline Molds and will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Business Combinations We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows, useful lives and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the measurement period, which is one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings. Income Taxes We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities along with net operating losses and tax credit carryovers. Deferred tax assets at both June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted primarily of basis differences related to research and development tax credit utilization, intangible assets, accrued expenses and inventories. Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Such determination is based on historical taxable income, with consideration given to estimates of future taxable income and the periods over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable. We record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. When we establish or reduce the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. Shipping and Handling Payments from customers for shipping and handling are included in net sales. Shipping expenses, consisting primarily of payments made to freight companies, are included in cost of sales. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of cash and trade receivables. We place our cash with major financial institutions. At June 30, 2016 and 2015, and throughout the fiscal years then ended, we had deposits in excess of federally insured limits. Credit sales are made to original equipment manufacturers and resellers throughout the world, and sales to such customers account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables. While such receivables are not collateralized, we evaluate their collectability based on several factors including customers’ payment histories. 33  Table of Contents Compensation Plans PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS We recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors. The fair value of share-based awards is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The portion that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as compensation cost over the requisite service period using the straight-line single option method. The determination of fair value using the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables, including expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, projected employee stock option exercise behaviors and forfeitures. We estimate stock price volatility based on two factors: (a) the measurement date (typically the grant date) and (b) the expected life of the option, which we calculate using the Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 simplified method. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our operations are affected by numerous factors including market acceptance of our products, changes in technologies, and new laws, government regulations and policies. We cannot predict what impact, if any, the occurrence of these or other events might have on our operations. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued warranty expense, inventory valuation, the carrying value of long-lived assets, and the recovery of deferred income tax assets. Basic and Diluted Per Share Information Basic per share amounts are computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period presented. Diluted per share amounts assume the exercise of all potential common stock equivalents, consisting solely of options to purchase common stock as discussed in Note 13, unless the effect of such exercise is to increase income, or decrease loss, per common share. Fair Value Measurements Fair value is measured based on the prices that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents is considered to be representative of their fair values based on the short term nature of these instruments. As such, cash and cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Investment in Ramsey property and related notes receivable: These investments were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for purposes of evaluating potential impairment of these assets as of June 30, 2015. The fair value of the property and related notes receivable was based upon the valuation of third party appraisals of the land and building as well as the equipment which was security for the notes less estimates of liquidation costs. Although the methods above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of the net realizable value or reflective of future fair values, we believe our valuation methods are appropriate. Advertising Advertising costs are charged to selling expense as incurred and amounted to $21,000 and $51,000 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 34  Table of Contents Recent Accounting Standards PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue depicting the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires enhanced revenue related disclosures. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption of the standard is permitted, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2017. This update permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this accounting standard update require debt issuance costs be presented on the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. The amendments in this accounting standard update are to be applied retrospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on our balance sheet. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as any related valuation allowance, to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years and earlier adoption is permitted. We elected early adoption during fiscal 2016 and have netted our current deferred income tax assets against our long term deferred income tax liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, (Topic 842) “Leases”. The objective of this update is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods and is to be applied utilizing a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. This update simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements. Reclassifications Certain prior period balances have been reclassified as it relates to our income tax disclosures in Note 7 to conform to the current period presentation. 3. Business Acquisitions During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, we completed two acquisitions. On December 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Huber Precision (“Huber”), a manufacturer of machined parts, primarily for the oil and electronics industry. The aggregate purchase price paid was $209,000. On February 1, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Fineline Molds (“Fineline”), a manufacturer of plastic injection molds for a variety of industries. The aggregate purchase price was $757,000, of which $657,000 was paid in cash at closing and $100,000 of which is to be paid by the Company under the terms of a four- year promissory note issued to Fineline at closing, which bears interest at 4% per annum and requires sixteen equal quarterly payments of principal and accrued interest in the amount on $6,794. The note is secured by all of the assets acquired by us from Fineline and is subordinate to the security interest created by the Summit Loan (as defined and described in Note 9). 35  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following summarizes the consideration paid and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired for each acquisition as of the respective acquisition date (in thousands): Consideration: Cash Promissory note payable to seller Total consideration Fair value of assets acquired: Inventory Fixed Assets Covenant not to compete Trade name Customer list and backlog Net assets acquired Goodwill Huber Purchase Price Allocation Fineline Purchase Price Allocation $ $ $ $ $ 209 — 209 5 37 30 — 137 209 — $ $ $ $ $ 657 100 757 — 149 22 54 179 404 353 The acquisitions were completed to support expansion of the business and broaden the Company’s customer base. We accounted for these acquisitions as business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. This method requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date. There were no liabilities assumed as part of either the Huber or Fineline acquisitions. Pro forma historical results of operations related to both acquisitions during the period prior to the acquisition date have not been presented because they are not material to our consolidated statements of operations. The results of operations related to the businesses acquired have been included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations since the date of acquisition, respectively. The fair value determination of assets recorded are those of management. The fair value determination of the customer list and backlog was based on the excess of earnings method which is based on the prospective net cash flows of the existing customers. The fair value determination of the trade name was based upon a relief from royalty approach which assesses the royalty savings an entity realizes since it owns the asset and isn’t required to pay a third party license for its use. The fair value determination of the covenants no to compete was based upon a discounted cash flow model. 4. Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Indefinite-lived intangibles are intangible assets whose useful lives are indefinite in that their lives extend beyond the foreseeable horizon – that is there is no foreseeable limit on the period of time over which they are expected to contribute to the cash flows of the reporting entity. The Company accounts for these items in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, which requires that impairment testing for goodwill is performed at least annually at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (also known as a component). We perform our annual impairment test as of January 31st of each year. Goodwill is also tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. 36  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of the Fineline goodwill and trade name (in thousands): Balance at July 1, 2014 Purchased Balance at July 1, 2015 Impairment charge Balance at June 30, 2016 Goodwill Trade name $ $ — 353 353 (241) 112 $ $ — 54 54 (4) 50 The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step approach. Step one compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, there is a potential impairment and step two must be performed. Step two compares the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its implied value (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit less the fair value of the unit’s assets and liabilities, including identifiable intangible assets). If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied value, the excess is recorded as an impairment. Under Step 1 of the impairment test the Company determined that the carrying value of the reporting unit including goodwill exceeded the fair value, requiring us to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The Company then performed Step 2 of the impairment test, and determined the implied value of Fineline goodwill was $112,000, which was less than its carrying value and, as a result, the Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $241,000 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. Additionally, our analysis indicated that the estimated fair value of the trade name acquired was $50,000 and therefore we recognized an impairment charge of $4,000 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. These impairment charges are included under the caption “Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets” in our consolidated statements of operations. There were no impairment charges recognized during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The valuation methods utilized to value the long-lived assets and the goodwill discussed above are based on the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and growth rates and include a determination of an appropriate discount rate. The cash flows utilized in the discounted cash flow analyses were based on financial forecasts developed internally by management. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually realized. Determining the fair value using a discounted cash flow method requires significant estimates and assumptions, including market conditions, discount rates, and long-term projections of cash flows. The Company’s estimates are based upon historical experience, current market trends, projected future volumes and other information. The Company believes that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable; however, different estimates and assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair value. 5. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consists of the following (in thousands): Raw materials /purchased components Work in process Sub-assemblies /finished components Finished goods Total inventory 37 June 30, 2016 2015 1,596 818 1,044 115 3,573 $ $ 2,025 1,030 1,095 160 4,310 $ $  Table of Contents Realized Gain on Sale of Investments PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, we liquidated our investment portfolio to fund our working capital requirements, especially our inventory requirements, as we prepared to launch production of two new products. We recorded realized gains of $455,000 during fiscal 2015 upon the sale of our investments in marketable equity securities of publicly held companies. We have not purchased, held or disposed of any marketable securities during fiscal 2016. Equipment and Leasehold Improvements Equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following (in thousands): June 30, 2016 2015 Office furnishings and fixtures Machinery and equipment Leasehold improvements Total Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization $ $ 2,007 4,953 2,094 9,054 (7,768) 1,286 Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 amounted to $497,000 and $534,000, respectively. Intangibles Intangibles consist of the following (in thousands): Capitalized software development costs Covenant not to compete Trade name Customer list and backlog Patent-related costs Total intangibles Less accumulated amortization June 30, 2016 73 52 50 316 121 612 (161) 451 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,008 4,803 2,086 8,897 (7,427) 1,470 June 30, 2015 73 52 54 316 96 591 (44) 547 Amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 amounted to $117,000 and $44,000 respectively. 38  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Capitalized software development costs relate to internally developed software, which was amortized over minimum unit sales of the underlying product and has been fully amortized as of June 30, 2016. Both the covenant not to compete and the customer list and backlog relate to assets acquired in conjunction with the business acquisitions of Huber and Fineline more fully described in Note 3 above and are being amortized over various periods not to exceed ten years. The trade name relates exclusively to Fineline and has an indefinite life, subject to impairment loss consideration if certain conditions exist. Patent-related costs consist of legal fees incurred in connection with both patent applications and a patent issuance, and will be amortized over the estimated life of the product(s) that is or will be utilizing the technology, or expensed immediately in the event the patent office denies the issuance of the patent. Expected amortization expense for the next five fiscal years ending June 30, are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year: 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total expected amortization Accrued Liabilities Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): Warranty Payroll and related items Accrued legal and professional fees Accrued sales, use and excise taxes Accrued losses on development contracts Accrued inventory in transit Other 5. Due from Factor Amortization Expense $ $ June 30, 2016 2015 $ $ 365 $ 443 60 7 28 11 83 997 $ 62 65 65 60 55 94 401 261 302 46 36 385 83 89 1,202 On September 9, 2015, we entered a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Summit Loan”) with Summit Financial Resources LP, (the “Factor”) whereby we can borrow up to $1.0 million against our eligible receivables, on a revolving basis, as defined in the agreement. Borrowed funds will bear interest at a rate of prime plus 2 percent, and incur an additional administrative fee of 0.7 percent on the monthly average outstanding balance. The Summit Loan has an initial period of 18 months with successive one year renewal options and requires an annual facility fee of $10,000. As of June 30, 2016, the total amount of receivables assigned to the Factor pursuant to the Summit Loan was $1.4 million and we bear the risk of loss in the event of non-payment by the customers. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, we borrowed $1.7 million, on a revolving basis, under the Summit Loan, which amounts were paid in full by June 30, 2016. Therefore, at June 30, 2016, we had no outstanding borrowings against the Summit Loan. 6. Warranty Accrual Information relating to the accrual for warranty costs for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands): Balance at beginning of year Accruals during the year Change in estimates of prior period accruals Warranty amortization Balance at end of year June 30, 2016 2015 $ $ 261 $ 350 (154) (92) 365 $ 237 372 (208) (140) 261 Warranty expense relating to new product sales and changes to estimates was $196,000 and $164,000, respectively, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. 39  Table of Contents 7. Income Taxes PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The provision for income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consists of the following amounts (in thousands): Current: Federal State Deferred: Federal State Income tax expense (benefit) Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 $ $ 11 $ 14 — — 25 $ — (44) — — (44) The effective income tax rate on loss from continuing operations differs from the United States statutory income tax rates for the reasons set forth in the table below (in thousands, except percentages). Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Amount Percent Pretax Income Amount Percent Pretax Income Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $ 847 100% $ (446) 100% Computed “expected” income tax expense (benefit) on income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $ State tax, net of federal benefit Tax incentives Change in valuation allowance Permanent differences State income tax rate adjustment Other Income tax expense (benefit) $ 288 9 (133) (141) — — 2 25 34% $ 1% (16%) (17%) — — — 2% $ (152) (30) (88) 227 — — (1) (44) (34%) (7%) (20%) 51% — — — (10%) Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of loss and credit carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities for federal and state income taxes are as follows (in thousands): Deferred tax assets: Federal & State NOL carryforward Research & other credits Reserves and accruals Inventory Other intangibles Goodwill Other Total gross deferred tax assets Less: valuation allowance Total deferred tax assets $ $ June 30, 2016 2015 1,144 $ 1,790 337 432 237 89 5 4,034 $ (3,773) 261 1,592 1,562 407 457 252 — 34 4,304 (3,961) 343 40  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Deferred tax liabilities: Property and equipment, principally due to differing depreciation methods Goodwill Other intangibles Other Total gross deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets June 30, 2016 2015 $ $ (261) $ — — — (261) — $ (316) (4) (1) (22) (343) — As of June 30, 2016 we had a net operating loss carry forward in the amount of approximately $1,899,000 including $22,000 of losses which have been created from excess stock compensation deductions, portions of which begin to expire in 2033. As of June 30, 2016 we have state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $5,876,000, which will begin to expire in 2026. Federal research and development and alternative minimum tax credit carry forwards at June 30, 2016 amount to $1,356,000, and begin to expire in 2027. State tax research credit carry forwards at June 30, 2016 amount to $870,000, the majority of which do not expire. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and the recoverability of our deferred tax asset. Such determination is based primarily on our historical taxable income, with some consideration given to our estimates of future taxable income by jurisdictions in which we operate and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. Due to cumulative taxable losses in recent years, we have maintained a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets at June 30, 2016 and 2015. The valuation allowance decreased by $188,000 and increased by $451,000 during the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, we have accrued $446,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to federal and state income tax matters that would reduce the Company’s income tax expense if recognized. However, since we currently have a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets the timing of the favorable effective tax rate impact will be delayed until such time, if ever, that the valuation allowance is eliminated. Information with respect to our accrual for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands): Unrecognized tax benefits: Beginning balance Additions based on federal tax positions related to the current year Additions based upon state tax positions related to the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for tax positions of prior years Ending balance June 30, 2016 2015 $ $ 399 $ 15 13 19 — 446 $ 363 8 15 13 — 399 Although it is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease within the next twelve months due to tax examinations, settlement activities, expirations of statute of limitations, or the impact on recognition and measurement considerations related to the results of published tax cases or other similar activities, we do not anticipate any significant changes to unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense when applicable. As of June 30, 2016, no interest or penalties applicable to our unrecognized tax benefits have been accrued since we have sufficient tax attributes available to fully offset any potential assessment of additional tax. We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state tax jurisdictions. We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended June 30, 2013 and later. However, because of net operating losses and research credit carryovers, substantially all of our tax years are open to audit. 41  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 8. Investment in Ramsey Property and Related Notes Receivable In November 2014, the Company purchased two promissory notes through a Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement in the amount of $1.2 million. The promissory notes were cross-collateralized and originally secured by (collectively, the “Collateral”), among other things, real property consisting of 2.3 acres of land and an approximate 30,000 square foot industrial building and a security interest in substantially all of the assets of Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. (“Riverside”) (consisting primarily of machine shop equipment and accounts receivable). The notes were recorded at their purchase price and since the notes remained in default, they were placed on nonaccrual status and therefore, the Company did not collect or recognize any interest income since the date of purchase. Additionally, due to uncertainties relating to future cash flows projected to be received on the notes, no accretable yield was recorded. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we entered into forbearance agreements with Riverside whereby we agreed to forbear from enforcing our rights under the promissory notes until July 31, 2015. Additionally, we entered into a revolving loan agreement, whereby we agreed to advance Riverside from time-to-time up to an aggregate amount of $200,000 at any time prior to July 31, 2015. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we amended the revolving loan agreement to provide for advances to Riverside of up to an aggregate amount of $300,000 under a Revolving Loan Modification Agreement. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we entered a settlement agreement such that we received the deed to the land and building located in Ramsey, Minnesota (the “Ramsey Property”) which had previously been held as security for the notes receivable. The notes were considered impaired because we did not believe the contractual payments would be collected pursuant to contract terms. Accordingly, the recorded investment was reflected at the lesser of the purchase price or the estimated fair value of the collateral (with appropriate reductions for estimated disposal costs). On September 22, 2015 we sent Riverside a proposal to accept the collateral in full satisfaction of Riverside’s debt. On October 13, 2015, title to the collateral transferred to the Company by operation of law. Therefore, on October 13, 2015, we took possession of all assets secured by the revolving loan agreement and promissory notes and Riverside ceased to operate. During the third quarter ended March 31, 2016 we sold the Ramsey Property for an aggregate purchase price of $1,653,000, collecting $1,441,000 upon close of escrow. Additionally, during fiscal 2016 we liquidated the Riverside machine shop equipment and collected some accounts receivable of Riverside that served as Collateral in the gross amount of $529,000. Therefore, during fiscal 2016 we recorded a gain on the sale of Investment in Ramsey in the amount of $340,000, which included a final accrual in the amount of $86,000 to be released from escrow upon completion of voluntary foreclosure proceedings. Accordingly, the $86,000 remaining to be collected as of June 30, 2016, has been recorded as other current receivables in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. 9. Notes Payable and Financing Transactions Fortitude Income Funds The Company borrowed $500,000 from Fortitude Income Funds, LLC under a promissory note dated September 8, 2015. The loan bore interest at 12 percent per annum, contained a loan origination fee of $15,000 plus expenses, and required monthly interest only payments until its original maturity scheduled on March 15, 2016. The loan was secured by a combination mortgage, security agreement and fixture statement covering the Ramsey Property. On February 22, 2016, the loan was repaid in full in conjunction with the sale of the Ramsey Property described above. 42  Table of Contents Summit Financial Resources LP PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Additionally, as discussed in Note 5, on September 9, 2015 we entered into the Summit Loan, whereby we can borrow up to $1.0 million against our eligible receivables, on a revolving basis, as defined in the loan agreement. Borrowed funds will bear interest at a rate of prime plus 2 percent, and incur an additional administrative fee of 0.7 percent on the monthly average outstanding balance. The Summit Loan has an initial period of 18 months with successive one year renewal options and requires an annual facility fee of $10,000. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 we borrowed 1.7 million, on a revolving basis, under the Summit Loan, which amounts were paid in full by June 30, 2016. Fineline Molds As discussed in Note 3, in conjunction with our acquisition of the assets of Fineline we issued a promissory note to Fineline in the amount of $100,000 which bears interest at 4% per annum and requires sixteen equal quarterly payments of principal and accrued interest in the amount of $6,794. The note is secured by all of the assets acquired by us from Fineline and is subordinate to the security interest created by the Summit Loan. The balance owed on the note as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 was approximately $70,000 and $94,000, respectively. 10. Commitments and Contingencies Leases We lease our office, production and warehouse facilities in Irvine, California and Beaverton, Oregon under agreements that expire in April 2018 and July 2017, respectively. Both leases require us to pay insurance, taxes, and other expenses related to the leased space. Additionally, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 we entered leases in conjunction with the acquisitions of Huber and Fineline, located in San Carlos, California and San Dimas, California respectively. The Huber lease expired on November 30, 2015 and all orders shipped since that date are manufactured at the Irvine facility. The Fineline lease expires on February 28, 2017. Finally, during fiscal 2015 we opened a sales office in Troy, Michigan to support our engineering services division. The lease expired on December 31, 2015 and as a result of closing down the office during fiscal 2015, we accrued for the remaining rent expense as of June 30, 2015. Rent expense in fiscal 2016 and 2015 was $561,000 and $550,000, respectively. Minimum lease payments for future fiscal years ending June 30 are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year: 2017 2018 Total minimum lease payments Compensation Arrangements Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan Operating Leases $ $ 549 361 910 The Pro-Dex, Inc. Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is a defined contribution plan we administer that covers substantially all our employees and is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan when they have attained 19 years of age and then can enter into the 401(k) Plan on the first day of each calendar quarter. Participants are eligible to receive non-discretionary Pro-Dex matching contributions of 25% of their contributions up to 5% of eligible compensation. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we recognized compensation expense amounting to $68,000 and $33,000, respectively, in connection with the 401(k) Plan. Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) In September 2013, our Board approved an AIP that provides sets of incentives to achieve performance goals on an annual and a multi-year basis. Previously accrued AIP awards of $15,000 were paid to the participants during fiscal 2016. No compensation expense was accrued under the terms of the AIP in either fiscal year 2016 or 2015. 43  Table of Contents Legal Matters PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS On August 1, 2016, we received correspondence from an attorney representing Scott Robertson, the former president of Riverside Manufacturing, Inc., claiming damages owed under claims of breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, wrongful self-help eviction among others. The letter requested a payment of $250,000 within 10 days of the date of the letter to fully settle the matter. We have made no such payment nor have we accrued any amounts owed related to this matter. On August 12, 2016, we responded to the letter indicating that we believe each and every claim has no legal merit. Additionally, on September 8, 2016, we sent a follow up correspondence asserting claims against Mr. Robertson including slander of title, fraudulent misrepresentation, conversion and theft. We have proposed a mutual release of all claims to settle this dispute and avoid potentially costly legal fees. As of the date of this filing, no litigation has commenced nor, to our knowledge, is pending. While we believe that we would prevail should this matter escalate, there can be no assurances that we will be successful should this matter be litigated. In addition to the matter described above we are from time to time a party to various legal proceedings incidental to our business. There can be no certainty, however, that we may not ultimately incur liability or that such liability will not be material and adverse. 11. Share-Based Compensation Stock Option Plans Through June 2014, we had two active stock option plans, the Second Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “Employees Stock Option Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2004 Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Stock Option Plan” and, collectively with the Employees Stock Option Plan, the “Option Plans”). The Option Plans were substantially similar, providing for a strike price equal to the closing price for a share of our common stock as of the last business day immediately prior to the Grant Date, vesting periods, as determined by the Board of Directors for the Employees Stock Option Plan and six months for the Directors Stock Option Plan, and terms of up to ten years, subject to forfeit 30 days after the holder ceases to be an employee or 90 days after the holder ceases to be director, as the case may be. Aggregate share-based compensation expense under the Plans for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $2,000 and $17,000, respectively. In June 2014, our Board of Directors terminated the Employee Stock Option Plan, with the provision that options outstanding under the Employee Stock Option Plan will remain outstanding in accordance with their respective terms. At the date of termination, 531,381 shares were reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Option Plan in excess of shares issuable pursuant to outstanding options, all of which shares were reallocated for issuance under the provisions of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan described below. In September 2014, our Board approved the inclusion in our proxy statement for approval by our shareholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders its recommendation to terminate the Directors’ Stock Option Plan, which proposal was approved by our shareholders at the December 3, 2014 Annual Meeting. At September 30, 2014, 173,334 shares were reserved for issuance under the Directors’ Stock Option Plan, all of which shares were reallocated for issuance under the provisions of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan described below. Stock Options There were no stock options granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. As of June 30, 2016, there was no unrecognized compensation cost under the Stock Option Plans as all outstanding stock options are fully vested. 44  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following is a summary of stock option activity under the Option Plans for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: Outstanding Options Balance, July 1, 2014 Options granted Options canceled or expired Options exercised Balance, July 1, 2015 Options granted Options canceled or expired Options exercised Balance, June 30, 2016 Stock Options Exercisable at June 30, 2016 Number of Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price 2.40 — 4.94 1.87 2.41 — (7.65) (2.14) 1.95 1.95 165,002 $ — (10,001) (48,333) 106,668 $ — (8,334) (7,500) 90,834 $ 90,834 $ The following table summarizes information regarding options outstanding and options exercisable under the Option Plans at June 30, 2016: Range of Exercise Prices $0 to 2.50 2.5 to 5.00 Total Number Outstanding Options Outstanding & Exercisable Weighted-Avg. Remaining Weighted-Avg. Exercise Price Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value 87,500 3,334 90,834 5.28 $ 0.88 5.12 years $ 1.86 $ 4.38 1.95 $ 323,750 3,934 327,684 Restricted Stock The following is a summary of restricted share activity for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: Balance, June 30, 2014 Granted Forfeited Vested Balance, June 30, 2015 Granted Forfeited Vested Balance, June 30, 2016 Outstanding Restricted Stock Units Weighted- Average Stock Price On Grant Date 1.73 — 1.73 1.73 1.73 — — 1.73 — Number of Shares 13,333 $ — (1,667) (6,666) 5,000 $ — — (5,000) — $ 45  Table of Contents Employee Stock Purchase Plan PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Also in September 2014, our Board approved the establishment of an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP conforms to the provisions of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, has coterminous offering and purchase periods of six months, and bases the pricing to purchase shares of our common stock on a formula so as to result in a per share purchase price that approximates a 15% discount from the market price of a share of our common stock at the end of the purchase period. The Board of Directors also approved the provision that shares formerly reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Option Plan and the Directors’ Stock Option Plan in excess of shares issuable pursuant to outstanding options, aggregating 704,715 shares, be reserved for issuance pursuant to the ESPP. The ESPP was approved by our shareholders at the December 3, 2014 Annual Meeting. On February 2, 2015, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 registering the 704,715 shares issuable under the ESPP under the Securities Act of 1933. During the first quarter ended September 30, 2015, 1,925 shares were purchased and allocated to employees based upon their contributions at a price of $2.34 per share, upon the completion of the first offering period. During the third quarter ended March 31, 2016, 3,671 shares were purchased and allocated to employees based upon their contributions at a price of $2.31 per share, upon the completion of the second offering period. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, we recorded stock compensation expense in the amount of $2,000 relating to the ESPP. 12. Major Customers & Suppliers Customers that accounted for sales in excess of 10% of our total sales in either of fiscal year 2016 or 2015, is as follows (in thousands, except percentages): Total revenue Customer concentration: Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3 Total Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total 20,157 100% $ 13,383 100% 4,999 3,630 2,855 11,484 25% $ 18% 14% 57% $ 445 6,569 21 7,035 3% 49% — 52% $ $ $ 46  Table of Contents PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Information with respect to accounts receivable from those customers whom comprised more than 10% of our gross accounts receivable at either June 30, 2016 or June 30, 2015, is as follows (in thousands, except percentages): Total gross accounts receivable, including amounts due from factor Customer concentration: Customer 1. Customer 2. Customer 3. Customer 4. Customer 5. Total. $ $ $ June 30, 2016 2,908 100% $ June 30, 2015 2,362 850 135 573 230 337 2,125 29% $ 5% 20% 8% 11% 73% $ 78 711 — 303 531 1,623 100% 3% 30% — 13% 22% 68% During fiscal 2016 and 2015, we had one supplier that accounted for 11 percent and 16 percent of total purchases, respectively. Accounts payable due to this same significant supplier represented 3 percent and 36 percent of total accounts payable as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 13. Net Income (Loss) Per Share We calculate basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities. Because we incurred a net loss for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, basic and diluted loss per share were the same as the inclusion of common shares of 22,607 representing potentially issuable shares under the terms of outstanding stock option grants would have had an antidilutive effect. The summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data): Basic: Income (loss) from continuing operations Weighted average shares outstanding Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Weighted average shares outstanding Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Weighted average shares outstanding Basic earnings (loss) per share Diluted: Income (loss) from continuing operations Weighted average shares outstanding Effect of dilutive securities – stock options Weighted average shares used in calculation of diluted earnings per share Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Weighted average shares used in calculation of diluted earnings per share Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Weighted average shares used in calculation of diluted earnings per share Diluted earnings (loss) per share 47 Years Ended June 30, 2016 2015 822 $ 4,141 0.20 $ — $ 4,141 — $ 822 $ 4,141 0.20 $ 822 $ 4,141 32 4,173 0.20 $ — $ 4,173 — $ 822 $ 4,173 0.20 $ (402) 4,169 (0.10) 37 4,169 0.01 (365) 4,169 (0.09) (402) 4,169 — 4,169 (0.10) 37 4,169 0.01 (365) 4,169 (0.09) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $  Table of Contents 14. Common Stock Share Repurchase Program PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In September 2013, our Board approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 750,000 shares of our common stock. In accordance with, and as part of, this share repurchase program, our Board approved, on March 22, 2016, the adoption of a prearranged share repurchase plan intended to qualify for the safe harbor under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“10b5-1 Plan” or “Plan”). The 10b5-1 Plan became effective on March 23, 2016 and through June 30, 2016 we repurchased 99,688 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $454,000. The 10b5-1 Plan terminated on July 6, 2016 in accordance with its provisions. Our prior 10b5-1 Plan commenced on September 24, 2014 and terminated on March 23, 2015. Through March 23, 2015, we repurchased 69,773 shares at an aggregate cost of $154,000, inclusive of fees, under the terms of the prior 10b5-1 Plan. Repurchases under both 10b5-1 Plans were administered through an independent broker. 15. Segment Information In fiscal 2016, the Company has four reportable segments based on its business activities and organization: · · · · Pro-Dex located in Irvine, California – providing primarily medical and dental instruments using shared production and assembly machines and workforce. This segment also incorporates Huber Precision as the revenues and assets of Huber Precision are not material to the Company’s total revenues and assets. Additionally, effective November 30, 2015 the former San Carlos office of Huber Precision was closed and all orders shipped since that date are manufactured at the Irvine facility. OMS located in Beaverton, Oregon – providing multi-axis motion control applications. Fineline located in San Dimas, California. This business was purchased on February 1, 2015 and is a manufacturer of plastic injection molds for a variety of industries. Engineering Services Division or (“ESD”). This division was launched in fiscal 2015 to provide permanent placement and contract services in the fields of engineering, manufacturing and quality to diverse businesses. In deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance, the Company’s chief executive officer regularly evaluates the sales and operating income of these segments. Operating income is the gross margin of the segment less direct expenses of the segment. Unallocated corporate expenses include our corporate administrative cost center, which primarily includes costs associated with being a public company, as well as general and administrative expenses incurred related to our investment in the Ramsey property and related notes receivable and is a subset of total general and administrative expenses. Additionally, other costs incurred in our general and administrative expenses (“G&A”) including salaries and other personnel-related expenses for corporate, accounting, finance and human resource personnel, as well as costs for outsourced information technology services, are not allocated by segment internally and are included in Pro-Dex in the tables below. The following tables summarize segment performance for fiscal 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): Fiscal 2016 Net Sales Gross Profit Operating Income (loss) Depreciation and amortization expense Total assets Pro-Dex OMS Fineline(1) ESD Corporate Unallocated Total $ 17,158 $ 4,632 1,985 536 7,414 969 $ 484 (282) 11 371 1,301 $ 32 (415) 67 660 730 $ 255 (70) — 186 — $ — (692) — 2,516 20,158 5,403 526 614 11,147 (1) The Fineline operating loss includes $245,000 related to impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. 48  Table of Contents Fiscal 2015 Net Sales Gross Profit Operating Income (loss) Depreciation and amortization expense Total assets PRO-DEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pro-Dex OMS Fineline ESD Corporate Unallocated Total $ 11,617 $ 2,653 75 536 8,479 1,394 $ 927 144 11 548 257 $ 44 (33) 31 962 115 $ 80 (361) — 17 — $ — (727) — 2,510 13,383 3,704 (902) 578 12,516 Revenue by geographic region, based upon the ship to address, consisted of the following (in thousands): Revenue by geographic region: North America Europe Other Total Revenue 16. Subsequent Events Years ended June 30, 2015 2016 $ $ 16,093 $ 3,840 225 20,158 $ 6,367 6,972 44 13,383 On July 21, 2016, we entered a master equipment lease agreement with Jules and Associates, Inc. to lease a specific machine used in our inspection process. The cost of the equipment was approximately $106,000 and the lease provides for 36 monthly payments in the amount of $3,121, as well as interim rent in the amount of $7,388. Additionally, as reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2016, the Company approved the adoption of a share repurchase plan intended to qualify for the safe harbor under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 effective September 8, 2016. 49  Table of Contents ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) have concluded, based on their evaluation as of June 30, 2016, that the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) are effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2016. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by written policies and procedures, that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of our Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that apply to smaller reporting companies that permit us to provide only management’s attestation in this annual report. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, there were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a- 15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 50  Table of Contents PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days of June 30, 2016, and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days of June 30, 2016, and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days of June 30, 2016, and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days of June 30, 2016, and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days of June 30, 2016, and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. 51  Table of Contents PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a)(3) Exhibits Reference is made to the Exhibit Index beginning on page 54 of this report. 52  Table of Contents SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on September 15, 2016. PRO-DEX, INC. /s/ Richard L. Van Kirk Richard L. Van Kirk President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) POWER OF ATTORNEY We, the undersigned directors and officers of Pro-Dex, Inc., do hereby constitute and appoint Richard L. Van Kirk, as our true and lawful attorney-in- fact and agent with power of substitution, to do any and all acts and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which such attorney-in-fact and agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including specifically but without limitation, power and authority to sign for us or any of us in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments hereto; and we do hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature /s/ Richard L. Van Kirk Richard L. Van Kirk /s/ Nicholas J. Swenson Nicholas J. Swenson /s/ Raymond E. Cabillot Raymond E. Cabillot /s/ William J. Farrell III William J. Farrell III /s/ David C. Hovda David C. Hovda Title Date President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) September 15, 2016 Chairman of the Board, Director September 15, 2016 Director Director Director 53 September 15, 2016 September 15, 2016 September 15, 2016  Table of Contents Exhibit No. INDEX TO EXHIBITS Description 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 10.1* 10.2* 10.3* 10.4 10.5* 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 23, 2007). Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 5, 2007). Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 18, 2010). Amended and Restated Bylaws, dated January 31, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 4, 2011) Second Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form S-8 filed February 15, 2012). Amended and Restated 2004 Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 filed February 15, 2012). Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and certain officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 29, 2008). Lease agreement with Irvine Business Properties, dated August 3, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 23, 2007). Annual Incentive Plan for the Senior Management (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 16, 2010). First Amendment To Lease – July 2013 by and between Irvine Business Properties and Pro-Dex, Inc., dated effective July 1, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 17, 2013). Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2014 by and between Pro-Dex, Inc. and Hans Huber, sole proprietor of Huber Precision (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed September 18, 2014) Amendment #1 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2014 by and between Pro-Dex, Inc. and Hans Huber, sole proprietor of Huber Precision (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed September 18, 2014) Amendment #2 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 6, 2014 by and between Pro-Dex, Inc. and Hans Huber, sole proprietor of Huber Precision (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed September 18, 2014) Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 21,2014, among the Bank, Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC, Heron Enterprises, LLC and Scott Robertson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Promissory Notes, as of various dates issued by Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. in favor of the Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Promissory Notes, as of various dates issued by Sheldon A. Mayer, LLC in favor of the Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) 54  Table of Contents 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 Debt Purchase Agreement, dated November 21, 2014, among Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC, Heron Enterprises, LLC and Scott C. Robertson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Promissory Note, dated September 20, 2013, issued by Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. in favor of Heron Enterprises, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Combination Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note, dated August 15, 2012 issued by Riverside Manufacturing Inc. in favor of Heron Enterprises, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Employment Agreement, dated November 21, 2014, between Pro-Dex Riverside, LLC and Scott C. Robertson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014) Amendment #3 to Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 28, 2014 by and between Pro-Dex, Inc. and Hans Huber, sole proprietor of Huber Precision (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 4, 2014) Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 8, 2014 by and between Pro-Dex, Inc., Fineline Molds and the shareholders of Fineline Molds (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 11, 2014) 10.19* Separation Agreement and General Release of All Claims entered into between Pro-Dex, Inc. and Harold. A. Hurwitz, dated February 12, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 17, 2015) 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 10.24 Heron Forbearance Agreement, effective February 3, 2015, by and between Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 9, 2015) Riverside Forbearance Agreement, effective February 3, 2015, by and between Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 9, 2015) Revolving Loan Agreement, effective February 3, 2015, by and between Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 9, 2015) First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective February 4, 2015, by and between Pro-Dex Riverside, LLC and Scott C. Robertson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 9, 2015) Deed and Settlement Agreement, dated May 7, 2015, by and among Sheldon A. Mayer, LLC, Sheldon A. Mayer and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 13, 2015) 10.25* Pro-Dex, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Severance Policy effective as of September 16, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 14, 2015) 10.26 10.27 Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 9, 2015, between Summit Financial Resources, L.P. and Pro-Dex, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2015) Intercreditor Agreement, dated September 9, 2015, among Summit Financial Resources, L.P., Fineline Molds and Pro-Dex, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2015) 55  Table of Contents 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 Promissory Note, dated September 8, 2015, made by Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC in favor of Fortitude Income Funds, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 14 ,2015) Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement, dated September 8, 2015, made by Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC in favor of Fortitude Income Funds, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 14 ,2015) Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated September 8, 2015, made by Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC favor of Fortitude Income Funds, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2015) Revolving Loan Agreement Modification Agreement, effective June 11, 2015, by and between Riverside Manufacturing, Inc. and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on September 17, 2015) Receipt for Earnest Money Deposit and Real Estate Purchase Contract, including Addendum to Real Estate Purchase Contract, dated January 6, 2016, by and between MO Real Estate, LLC and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2016) 10.33 Amendment to Real Estate Purchase Contract, dated February 19, 2016, by and between MO Real Estate, LLC and Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 25, 2016) 21.1 Ω List of Subsidiaries 23 Ω 31.1 Ω 31.2 Ω 32 Ω Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 101.INS** XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document 101.DEF** XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase Document Ω * ** Filed herewith. Denotes management contract or compensatory arrangement. Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Company is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Company has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability. 56 Pro-Dex Sunfish Lake, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Pro-Dex Riverside, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company List of Subsidiaries Exhibit 21.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-201825, 333-112133, 333-141178 and 333-179536) of Pro-Dex, Inc. pertaining to the Pro-Dex, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Pro-Dex, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan and the Pro-Dex, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, Inc., of our report dated September 15, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pro-Dex, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2016. Exhibit 23 /s/ Moss Adams LLP Moss Adams LLP Irvine, California September 15, 2016 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 31.1 I, Richard L. Van Kirk, certify that: 1. 2. 3. 4. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Pro-Dex, Inc.; Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 15, 2016 /s/ Richard L. Van Kirk Richard L. Van Kirk Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 31.2 I, Alisha K. Charlton, certify that: 1. 2. 3. 4. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Pro-Dex, Inc.; Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 15, 2016 /s/ Alisha K. Charlton Alisha K. Charlton Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Pro-Dex Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: September 15, 2016 Date: September 15, 2016 By: /s/ Richard L. Van Kirk Richard L. Van Kirk Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) By: /s/ Alisha K. Charlton Alisha K. Charlton Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and Furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above