UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018
or
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33761
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
20-8999751
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
320 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 355-1600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☐
☐
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☒
☒
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes No
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2018, the last business day of its most recently completed
second fiscal quarter, was approximately $156.2 million based on the closing sale price of $9.21 per share of Class A common stock of the registrant on such date on
the New York Stock Exchange. For purposes of this calculation only, it is assumed that the affiliates of the registrant include only directors and executive officers of
the registrant.
As of March 7, 2019, there were 18,189,544 outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
As of March 7, 2019, there were 52,194,349 outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock, par value $0.000001 per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2019 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. The 2019 Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form of 10-K Summary
SIGNATURES
Page
ii
1
1
12
24
24
24
24
25
25
26
28
43
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
46
46
47
47
50
51
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Annual Report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 27E of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Forward-looking statements provide our current
views, expectations, or forecasts, of future events and performance and include statements about our expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. Words or phrases
such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,”
“predict,” “project” or similar words or phrases, or the negatives of those words or phrases, may identify forward-
looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-
looking.
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to those noted below and described in Part I, Item 1A — "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report, and are based
on assumptions and estimates. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if one or more of our
assumptions or estimates prove incorrect, our actual results could differ materially from those expected or implied
by the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on any forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report, speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. There may
be additional risks, uncertainties and factors that we do not currently view as material or that are not known. We
undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events after
the date of this Annual Report, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, however, review the
factors and risks we describe in the reports we will file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, after the date of this Annual Report.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to respond to global economic, market, business and geopolitical conditions;
our anticipated future results of operations and operating cash flows;
our successful formulation and execution of business strategies and investment policies;
our financing plans and the availability of short- or long-term borrowing, or equity financing;
our competitive position and the effects of competition on our business;
our ability to identify and capture potential growth opportunities available to us;
the recruitment and retention of our employees;
our expected levels of compensation for our employees;
expectations relating to dividend payments and our ability to make such payments;
our potential operating performance, achievements, efficiency and cost reduction efforts;
our expected tax rate;
changes in interest rates;
our expectation with respect to the economy, capital markets, the market for asset management services and
other industry trends; and
the impact of future legislation and regulation, and changes in existing legislation and regulation, on our
business.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preliminary Notes
In this Annual Report, “we,” “our,” “us,” and “the Company” refer to Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
All rights in the Russell 1000® Value Index, Russell Mid Cap® Value Index, Russell 2000® Value Index vest in
the relevant London Stock Exchange Group plc (“LSE Group”) company which owns the relevant Index. “Russell®”
is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group company and is used by any other LSE Group company under license.
Information with respect to MSCI, requires a license from MSCI. The MSCI information provided in this
Annual Report may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-disseminated in any form and
may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the
MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from
making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not
be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI
information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made
of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling,
computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties
(including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement,
merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the
foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive,
consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages. (www.msci.com)
The S&P 500 Index is licensed from Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, which is the source of the
performance statistics of this index.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. was formed in 2007 and is the sole managing member of Pzena Investment
Management, LLC, which is our operating company. Founded in 1995, Pzena Investment Management, LLC is a
value-oriented investment management company. We believe that we have established a positive, team-oriented
culture that enables us to attract and retain highly qualified people. Since our inception, over twenty years ago, we
have built a diverse, global client base of respected and sophisticated institutional investors, select third-party
distributed mutual funds for which we act as sub-investment adviser, and funds for which we act as investment
adviser.
Pzena Investment Management, LLC is comprised of Class A and Class B membership units, each of which
have an identical economic interest in the operating company. As a holding company, we hold all of the Class A
membership units and recognize income generated from our economic interest in our operating company's net
income. The Class B membership units of the operating company are held by employees and certain outside
members. For each Class A membership unit held, we have issued one corresponding share of Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, which entitles the holder to one vote per share. For each Class B membership unit,
we have issued one corresponding share of Class B common stock, par value $0.000001 per share, which entitles the
holder to five votes per share without dividend rights, as described below in the graphic illustration. As of
December 31, 2018, we owned approximately 26.4% of the economic interest in our operating company and our
Class A shareholders hold approximately 6.7% of our voting interests.
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. also serves as the general partner of Pzena Investment Management, LP, a
partnership formed with the objective of aggregating employee ownership in one entity.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The graphic below illustrates our holding company structure and ownership as of December 31, 2018.
Principals (1)
Public
Stockholders
Class A
Common Stock,
6.7% Voting
Interest (2)
Class B
Common Stock,
93.3% Voting
Interest (3)
Pzena Investment
Management, Inc.
Class B Units
73.6% Economic Interest (5)(6)
Sole Managing Member
Class A Units,
26.4% Economic Interest
(4)(6)
Pzena Investment
Management, LLC
(1) As of December 31, 2018, the members of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, other than us, consisted of:
•
•
•
Richard S. Pzena, John P. Goetz, and William L. Lipsey, our named executive officers, and their estate planning vehicles, who
collectively held, through direct and indirect interests, approximately 49.9% of the economic interests in Pzena Investment
Management, LLC.
40 of our other employee members and their estate planning vehicles, who collectively held, through direct and indirect interests,
approximately 4.6% of the economic interests in Pzena Investment Management, LLC.
Certain other members of our operating company, including one of our directors and his related entities, and former employees, who
collectively held, through direct and indirect interests, approximately 19.1% of the economic interests in Pzena Investment
Management, LLC.
(2) Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share.
(3) Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to five votes per share for so long as the number of shares of Class B common stock
outstanding represents at least 20% of all shares of common stock outstanding. Holders of Class B common stock have the right to receive
the par value of the Class B common stock held by them upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, but do not share in dividends.
(4) As of December 31, 2018, we held 18,398,211 Class A units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, which represented the right to receive
26.4% of the distributions made by Pzena Investment Management, LLC.
(5) As of December 31, 2018, the principals collectively held 51,302,126 Class B units of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, which
represented the right to receive 73.6% of the distributions made by Pzena Investment Management, LLC.
(6) Pursuant to the operating agreement of our operating company, each vested Class B unit is exchangeable for a share of the Company's Class
A common stock, subject to certain timing and volume restrictions. When a vested Class B unit is exchanged for a share of Class A
common stock, or is forfeited, a corresponding share of the Company's Class B common stock will automatically be redeemed and
cancelled. When a share of Class A common stock or Class B unit is repurchased and retired, a corresponding membership unit or share of
Class B common stock is redeemed and cancelled, respectively. Conversely, to the extent that we issue shares of Class A common stock, or
additional Class B units pursuant to our equity incentive plans, the corresponding Class A membership units or shares of Class B common
stock will be issued, respectively.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We utilize a classic value approach to investing and seek to make investments in good businesses at low prices,
which requires:
• willingness to invest in companies before their stock prices reflect signs of business improvement, and
•
significant patience, based upon our understanding of the business’ fundamentals, and our long-term
investment horizon.
Our approach and process aim to achieve attractive returns over the long term. We manage assets in value-
oriented investment strategies reflecting varying degrees of portfolio concentrations across a wide range of market
capitalizations in both U.S. and non-U.S. capital markets.
Our assets under management, or AUM, was $33.4 billion at December 31, 2018, and we managed money on
behalf of institutions, acted as sub-investment adviser to a variety of SEC-registered mutual funds and non-U.S.
funds as well as investment adviser to Pzena SEC-registered mutual funds, certain private placement funds, and non-
U.S. funds.
Our operating company is led by a committee, consisting of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Mr. Richard S.
Pzena; each of our Presidents, Messrs. John P. Goetz and William L. Lipsey; and our Chief Operating Officer
(COO), Mr. Gary J. Bachman (the "Executive Committee").
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following are our competitive strengths:
•
•
Focus on Investment Excellence. We recognize that we must achieve investment excellence in order to
attain long-term business success. All of our business decisions, including the design of our investment
process and our willingness to limit AUM in our investment strategies, are focused on producing attractive
long-term investment results. We believe that our long-term investment performance, together with our
willingness to close our strategies to new investors in order to optimize the prospects for future
performance, has contributed to our positive reputation among our clients and the institutional consultants
who advise them.
Consistency of Investment Process. Since our inception over twenty years ago, we have utilized a classic
value investment approach and a systematic, disciplined investment process to construct portfolios for our
investment strategies in U.S. and non-U.S. markets across all market capitalizations. The consistency of
our process has allowed us to leverage the same investment team to launch new strategies. We believe that
our consistent investment process has resulted in our strong brand recognition in the investment
community.
• Diverse and High Quality Client Base. We believe that we have developed a favorable reputation in the
institutional investment community. This is evidenced by our strong relationships with institutional
investors, investment consultants, and mutual fund providers, as well as the diversity and sophistication of
our investors. For more information concerning our client base, see “Our Client Relationships and
Distribution Approach” below.
•
•
Experienced Investment Professionals and a Team-Oriented Approach. We believe that our greatest
asset is the experience of the individuals on our team. For more information on our investment team, see
“Our Investment Team” below.
Employee Retention. We have focused on building an environment that we believe is attractive to talented
investment professionals. Important among our practices are our team-oriented approach to investment
decisions, rotation of coverage areas among individuals, and our culture of employee ownership.
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
Culture of Ownership. We believe the key contributors to our success should have significant ownership
of our business. Since our inception, we have communicated to all our employees that they have the
opportunity to become members of our operating company. As of December 31, 2018, we had 43
employee members positioned within all of our functional areas. We believe this ownership model results
in a shared sense of purpose with our clients and their advisers. We intend to continue fostering a culture
of ownership through our equity incentive plans, which are designed to align our team’s interests with those
of our stockholders and clients. We believe this culture of ownership contributes to our team orientation
and connection with clients.
Our Business Strategy
The key to our success is continued long-term investment performance. In conjunction with this, we believe the
following strategies will enable us to grow our business over time:
• Unwavering Focus on Classic Value Investing. We view our unwavering focus on long-term classic
value investment excellence to be the key driver of our business success.
•
Capitalize on Growth Opportunities Created By Our Global Strategies. Among both institutional and
retail investors industry-wide, over the past few years, there have been increasing levels of investments in
portfolios including non-U.S. equities. As of December 31, 2018, the total AUM in our Global Value
strategies, International Value strategies, Emerging Markets Value strategy, European Value strategy, and
other Global & non-U.S. strategies was $18.9 billion, or 56.6% of our overall AUM. Our global capability
provides opportunity for implementation of our strategies around the world.
• Work with Our Strong Consultant Relationships. We believe that we have built strong relationships with
the leading investment consulting firms who advise potential institutional clients. Historically, new
accounts sourced through consultant-led searches have been a large driver of our inflows and are expected
to be a major component of our future inflows. We estimate that approximately 70% of all retirement plan
assets are advised by investment consultants, with a relatively small number of these consultants
representing a significant majority of these relationships. As a result of a consistent servicing effort over
our history, we have built strong relationships with consulting firms that we believe are the most important.
New accounts sourced through consultant-led searches have been a large driver of our historical growth and
are expected to be a major component of our future growth. As of December 31, 2018, our largest
consultant relationship represented approximately 10.5% of our AUM.
•
•
Expand Our Non-U.S. Client Base. In recent years, we have increased our efforts to develop our non-U.S.
client base. Through our strong relationships with global consultants, we have been able to accelerate the
development of our relationships with their non-U.S. branches. Over time, we aim to achieve growth of
this client base through these relationships and by directly calling on the world’s largest institutional
investors. We have also sought to expand our non-U.S. base through our relationships with non-U.S.
mutual funds and other investment fund advisers. In addition to our headquarters in the United States, we
have a business development and client service office in London as well as a representative office in
Melbourne. To date, our marketing efforts have resulted in client relationships in sixteen non-U.S.
countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Canada, and Ireland. As of
December 31, 2018, we managed $10.8 billion on behalf of non-U.S. clients.
Provide Access To Our Strategies Through a Range of Investment Vehicles and Distribution Channels.
Our clients access our investment strategies through a range of investment vehicles and distribution
channels, including separately managed accounts, mutual funds that we sub-advise, and certain private
placement vehicles and non-U.S. funds. We also offer four SEC-registered Pzena mutual funds for which
we act as investment adviser. During 2018, we launched a fifth SEC-registered Pzena mutual fund and an
additional private placement vehicle for which we act as the sole investment adviser in an effort to expand
the access investors have to our strategies. For more information concerning access to our strategies and
our distribution approach, see “Our Client Relationships and Distribution Approach” below.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
•
Employ Global Team to Serve Clients and Prospects. Our business development and client service
professionals are critical to our business, as noted below under "Business Development and Client Service
Teams," and are generally focused geographically covering both our institutional and intermediary
distribution efforts. In addition to our headquarters in the United States and representative office in
Melbourne, we have four dedicated professionals located in our London office.
Corporate Environmental and Social Responsibility. As a global investment management organization,
we are committed to adopting and implementing responsible investment principles in a manner that is
consistent with our fiduciary responsibilities to our clients. We recognize the importance of considering
environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues as part of a robust investment process. In the beginning
of 2018, we became a signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), which is a leading
global responsible investment network of investment managers, service providers and asset owners.
Our Investment Team
We have built an investment team that is well-suited to implement our classic value investment strategy. The
members of our investment team have a diverse set of backgrounds, including former corporate management,
private equity, management consulting, accounting, and Wall Street professionals. Their diverse business
backgrounds are instrumental in enabling us to make investments in companies where we would be comfortable
owning the entire business for a three- to five-year period. We look beyond temporary earnings shortfalls that result
in stock price declines, which may lead others to forego investment opportunities, if we believe the long-term
fundamentals of a company remain attractive.
As of December 31, 2018, we had a 24-member investment team. Each member serves as a research analyst,
and certain members of the team also have portfolio management responsibilities. There are generally three portfolio
managers for each investment strategy. These three managers have joint decision-making responsibility, and each
has “veto authority” over all decisions regarding the relevant portfolio. Research analysts have sector and company-
level research responsibilities which span all of our investment strategies, including those with a non-U.S. focus. In
order to facilitate the professional development of our team, and to keep a fresh perspective on the companies in our
investment portfolios, our research analysts generally rotate industry coverage every three to four years.
We follow a collaborative, consensus-oriented approach to making investment decisions, such that all members
of our investment team, irrespective of their seniority, can play a significant role in this decision-making process.
We hold weekly research review meetings attended by all portfolio managers and relevant research analysts, and
that are open to other employees, at which we openly discuss and debate our findings regarding the normalized
earnings power of potential portfolio companies. In addition, we hold daily morning meetings, attended by our
portfolio managers, research analysts, portfolio implementation, and client service personnel, in order to review
developments in our holdings and set a trading strategy for the day. These meetings are critical for sharing relevant
developments and analysis of the companies in our portfolios. We believe that our collaborative culture is attractive
to our investment professionals.
Our Investment Strategies
As of December 31, 2018, our approximately $33.4 billion in AUM was invested in a variety of value-oriented
investment strategies, representing differing degrees of concentration, and capitalization segments of U.S. and non-
U.S. markets. See "Item 7 — Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of
Operations — Operating Results — Assets Under Management and Flows" for additional details about our
strategies.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following table identifies our current U.S. and non-U.S. investment strategies, and the allocation of our
AUM among them, as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Strategy
U.S. Value Strategies
Large Cap Value
Mid Cap Value
Value
Small Cap Value
Other U.S. Strategies
Global and Non-U.S. Strategies
Global Value
International Value
Emerging Markets Value
European Value
Other Global and Non-U.S. Strategies
Total
As of December 31,
2017
2016
2018
(in billions)
$
$
9.0 $
2.3
1.8
1.2
0.2
6.0
5.7
4.0
2.9
0.3
33.4 $
11.2 $
2.8
2.2
1.6
0.1
6.7
6.3
4.3
3.2
0.1
38.5 $
9.4
2.5
2.0
1.6
0.1
4.6
4.9
2.6
2.1
0.2
30.0
We follow the same investment process for each of these strategies. Our investment strategies are distinguished
by the market capitalization ranges from which we select securities for their portfolios, which we refer to as each
strategy’s investment universe, as well as the regions in which we invest. In addition, the number of holdings
typically found in the portfolios of each of our investment strategies may vary depending on the degree of
concentration in the portfolio, with our Focused Value strategies generally reflecting fewer holdings than our Value
strategies.
Our largest investment strategies as of December 31, 2018 are further described below. This strategy detail is
representative of our Value and Focused Value strategies, and variations thereof.
U.S. Strategies
Large Cap Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 80 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of 500 of the largest U.S. listed companies, based on market capitalization.
Mid Cap Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 80 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of U.S. listed companies ranked from the 201st to 1,200th largest, based on market capitalization.
Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of a portfolio of approximately 30 to 40 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 1,000 of the largest U.S. listed companies, based on market capitalization.
Small Cap Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 50 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of U.S. listed companies ranked from the 1,001st to 3,000th largest, based on market capitalization.
Global and Non-U.S. Strategies
Global Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 95 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of 2,000 of the largest companies across the world, based on market capitalization.
International Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 80 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 1,500 of the largest companies across the world, excluding the United States, based on
market capitalization.
Emerging Markets Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 80 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 1,500 of the largest emerging market companies, based on market capitalization.
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
European Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 50 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of 750 of the largest European companies, based on market capitalization.
We believe that our ability to retain and grow assets has been, and will continue to be, driven primarily by
delivering attractive long-term investment results to our clients. We have therefore prioritized, and will continue to
prioritize, investment performance over asset accumulation. Where we have deemed it necessary, we have, at times,
closed certain products to new investors in order to preserve capacity to effectively implement our concentrated
investment strategies for the benefit of existing clients. Currently, all of our investment strategies are open to new
investors.
Our Strategy Development Approach
Historically, a component of our growth has been the development of new strategies. Prior to incubating a new
strategy, we perform in-depth research on the potential market for the product, as well as its overall compatibility
with our investment expertise. This process involves analysis by our client team, as well as by our investment
professionals. We will only launch a new product if we believe that it can add value to a client’s investment
portfolio. Prior to marketing a new strategy, we generally incubate the product for a period of one to five years, so
that we can test and refine our investment strategy and process before actively marketing the product to our clients.
Our Investment Performance
Since we are long-term fundamental investors, we believe that our investment strategies yield the most benefits
and are best evaluated, over a long-term timeframe. For more information on our performance, see “Item 7 —
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Operating Results —
Assets Under Management and Flows.”
Our Client Relationships and Distribution Approach
We believe that strong relationships with our clients are critical to our ability to succeed and to grow our AUM.
In building these relationships, we have focused our efforts where we can efficiently access and service large pools
of sophisticated clients with our team of dedicated business development and client service professionals.
We distribute our products primarily through the efforts of our business development and client service team,
who communicate directly with our clients and with the consultants who serve them, as well as through the
marketing programs of our sub-investment advisory partners and intermediary distribution partners. Since our
objective is to attract long-term investors with an investment horizon in excess of three years, our business
development and client service efforts focus on educating our investors and intermediary distribution partners
regarding our disciplined classic value investment process and philosophy.
Our business development and client service team is responsible for:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
identifying, developing relationships with, and marketing to prospective clients;
providing ongoing service to existing accounts;
responding to requests for investment management proposals;
developing and maintaining relationships with independent consultants;
developing and maintaining relationships with intermediary partners to grow retail distribution capabilities;
addressing all ongoing client needs, including periodic updates and reporting requirements; and
developing direct relationships with clients sourced through consultant-led searches.
7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Our business development and client service team is actively engaged with our research team to ensure our
clients receive content-based information. We introduce members of our research and portfolio management team
into client portfolio reviews to ensure that our clients are exposed to the full breadth of our investment resources.
We also provide quarterly reports to our clients in order to share our investment perspectives. We additionally meet
and hold conference calls regularly with clients to share perspectives on the portfolio and the current investment
environment.
Distribution Channels
We manage assets in three principal distribution channels. A summary of selected financial data attributable to
our operations for each distribution channel is included in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The following table provides information regarding the
composition of our total assets under management by distribution channel:
Assets Under Management
Separately Managed Accounts
Sub-Advised Accounts
Pzena Funds
Total
Separately Managed Accounts
As of December 31,
2017
2016
2018
(in billions)
$
$
12.6 $
18.8
2.0
33.4 $
15.0 $
21.8
1.7
38.5 $
12.5
16.3
1.2
30.0
Since our inception, we have directly offered institutional investment products to public and corporate pension
funds, endowments, foundations, high net worth individuals and their investment vehicles. We continue to develop
direct relationships with the largest institutional investors and consultants around the world.
Sub-Advised Accounts
We have established relationships with mutual fund and fund providers globally, that offer us opportunities to
efficiently access market segments through sub-investment advisory roles. The funds that we sub-advise are either
multi-manager funds, in which we manage only a portion of the fund's portfolio, or funds for which we are the sole
sub-adviser.
Pzena Funds
U.S. investors that do not meet our minimum account size for a separate account, or who otherwise prefer to
invest through a mutual fund, can invest in certain of our strategies through our Pzena mutual funds. In 2018, we
launched a fifth Pzena mutual fund. We act as the investment adviser to five Pzena mutual funds that offer no-load,
open-end share classes designed to meet the needs of a range of investor types.
In addition, we offer investors outside of the U.S. the ability to invest in our strategies through Pzena Value
Funds plc and its respective sub-funds, a family of Irish-based UCITS funds for which we serve as investment
manager and promoter. Pzena Value Funds plc began operations in 2005 and offers shares to non-U.S. investors.
We currently offer a sub-fund corresponding to our Emerging Markets Focused Value, Global Value, Global
Focused Value, and Large Cap Value strategies.
In the U.S., we offer access to many of our U.S., global and non-U.S. strategies through private placement
vehicles and collective investment trusts.
8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Advisory Fees
We earn advisory fees on our separately managed and sub-advised accounts, as well as funds for which we act
as the sole investment adviser.
On our separately managed accounts, we are paid fees according to a schedule which varies by investment
strategy. The substantial majority of these accounts pay us management fees pursuant to a schedule in which the
rate we earn on the AUM declines as the amount of AUM increases.
With respect to our sub-advised accounts, as of December 31, 2018, we sub-advised nineteen SEC-registered
mutual funds that each have an initial two-year term and are thereafter subject to annual renewal by each fund’s
board of directors pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).
Fifteen of these nineteen sub-investment advisory agreements are beyond their initial two-year terms as of
December 31, 2018. In addition, we sub-advise twenty-nine non-U.S. funds. Under these agreements, we are
generally paid a management fee according to a schedule, pursuant to which the rate we earn on the AUM declines
as the amount of AUM increases. Certain of these funds pay us fixed-rate management fees. Due to the
substantially larger account size of certain of these accounts, the average advisory fees we earn on them, as a
percentage of AUM, are lower than the advisory fees we earn on our separately managed accounts.
Advisory fees we earn on separately managed accounts and Pzena funds are generally based on the value of
AUM at a specific date on a quarterly basis. Certain of our separately managed accounts, sub-advised accounts, and
Pzena funds are calculated based on the average of the monthly or daily market value of the account. Advisory fees
are also generally adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than
10% of the value of the portfolio. While a specific group of accounts may use the same fee rate, the calculation
methodology may differ, as described above.
Certain of our clients pay us performance fees according to the performance of their accounts relative to certain
agreed-upon benchmarks, which results in a lower base fee, but allows for us to earn higher fees if the relevant
investment strategy outperforms the agreed-upon benchmark. Some performance-based fee arrangements include
high-water mark provisions, which generally provide that if a client account underperforms relative to its
performance target, it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees.
Fulcrum fee arrangements related to one client relationship require a reduction in the base fee, or allow for a
performance fee if the relevant investment strategy underperforms or outperforms, respectively, the agreed-upon
benchmark.
Competition
We compete in all aspects of our business with a large number of investment management firms, commercial
banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies, and other financial institutions.
In order to grow our business, we must be able to compete effectively to maintain existing AUM and attract
additional AUM. Historically, we have competed for AUM principally on the basis of:
•
•
•
•
•
•
the performance of our investment strategies;
our clients’ perceptions of our drive, focus, and alignment of our interests with theirs;
the quality of the service we provide to our clients and the duration of our relationships with them;
our brand recognition and reputation within the investing community;
the range of strategies and investment vehicles we offer; and
the level of advisory fees we charge for our investment management services.
Our ability to continue to compete effectively will also depend upon our ability to attract highly qualified
investment professionals and retain our existing employees.
9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Employees
At December 31, 2018, we had 106 full-time employees, including 24 investment professionals and 15 business
development and client service professionals.
Cybersecurity
We maintain our information technology infrastructure with a focus on business efficiency, continuity, security
and controls. The information technology environment is designed to oversee and maintain all aspects of
information security risk to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of information assets. We regularly perform
evaluations of our security program and continue to invest in our capabilities to keep clients, employees, and critical
assets safe. The Chief Information & Operations Officer and Chief Information Security Officer (“CIOO/CISO”) is
ultimately responsible for our cybersecurity program which includes the implementation of controls aligned with
industry guidelines and applicable statutes and regulations to identify threats, detect attacks and protect these
information assets. We have implemented security monitoring capabilities designed to alert us to suspicious activity
and developed an incident response program that includes periodic testing and is designed to restore business
operations as quickly and as orderly as possible in the event of a breach. In addition, employees participate in
ongoing mandatory trainings and receive communications regarding the cybersecurity environment to increase
awareness throughout the firm.
Regulatory Environment and Compliance
Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the United States at both the federal and state level, as well as
by self-regulatory organizations. Under these laws and regulations, agencies that regulate investment advisers have
broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict, or prohibit an investment adviser from carrying
on its business in the event that it fails to comply with such laws and regulations. Possible sanctions that may be
imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for
specified periods of time, revocation of investment adviser and other registrations, censures and fines. Our business
is also subject to foreign regulation, as discussed below.
SEC Regulation
Our operating company, Pzena Investment Management, LLC, is registered as an investment adviser with the
SEC. As a registered investment adviser, it is subject to the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended, which we refer to as the Investment Advisers Act, and the SEC’s regulations thereunder, as well as to
examination by the SEC’s staff. The Investment Advisers Act imposes substantive regulation on virtually all
aspects of Pzena Investment Management, LLC's business and its relationships with its clients. As an investment
adviser, Pzena Investment Management, LLC owes fiduciary duties to its clients, which relate to conflicts of
interest, client recommendations and other fundamental matters. Applicable requirements relate to, among other
things, engaging in transactions with clients, maintaining an effective compliance program, performance fees,
solicitation arrangements, advertising, recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements.
The U.S. funds for which Pzena Investment Management, LLC acts as the sub-investment adviser and five of
the U.S. funds for which Pzena Investment Management, LLC acts as investment adviser, are registered with the
SEC under the Investment Company Act. The Investment Company Act imposes additional obligations, including
detailed operational requirements for both the funds and their advisers. Moreover, the Investment Company Act
requires that an investment adviser’s contract with a registered fund may be terminated by the fund on not more than
60 days’ notice, and is subject to annual renewal by the fund’s board after an initial two-year term.
Both the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act regulate the “assignment” of advisory
contracts by the investment adviser. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for
violations of the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, ranging from fines and censures to
termination of an investment adviser’s registration.
Pzena Financial Services, LLC, our SEC registered broker-dealer subsidiary, is subject to the SEC's Uniform
Net Capital Rule, which requires that at least a minimum part of a registered broker-dealer's assets be kept in
10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
relatively liquid form. At December 31, 2018, Pzena Financial Services, LLC had net capital of $400,428, which
was $386,894 in excess of its net capital requirement of $13,534.
ERISA-Related Regulation
With respect to our benefit plan clients, Pzena Investment Management, LLC is a “fiduciary” under the
Employment Retirement Act of 1974, or ERISA, and is therefore subject to ERISA, and to regulations promulgated
thereunder. ERISA and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose certain duties on persons who
are fiduciaries under ERISA, prohibit certain transactions involving ERISA plan clients, and provide monetary
penalties for violations of these prohibitions.
Foreign Regulation
Pzena Investment Management, LLC maintains a representative office in Melbourne, Australia, and maintains
an exemption from the Australian Financial Services license requirement under the Corporations Act 2001 of the
Commonwealth of Australia.
Pzena Investment Management, Ltd, our United Kingdom subsidiary, is an appointed representative of
Mirabella Advisers LLP which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") in the
United Kingdom. In Europe outside of the United Kingdom, Pzena Investment Management, Ltd is an appointed
representative and tied agent of DMS Capital Solutions (UK) Limited which is authorized and regulated by the
FCA. Pzena Investment Management, LLC has a Category I Financial Service Provider License and is regulated in
South Africa by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority.
Pzena Investment Management, LLC currently avails itself of the international adviser exemption in Ontario,
Canada. In addition, Pzena Investment Management, LLC is registered as an exempt market dealer in Ontario,
Canada. As an exempt adviser, Pzena Investment Management, LLC is only permitted to provide advice in Ontario
to certain institutional and high net worth individual clients. As an exempt market dealer, Pzena Investment
Management, LLC is permitted to act as a market intermediary for only certain types of trades, and is permitted to
market, sell and distribute prospectus-exempt securities to accredited investors. An exempt adviser and market
dealer must, upon the request of the Ontario Securities Commission, or OSC, produce all books, papers, documents,
records and correspondence relating to its activities in Ontario, and inform the OSC if it becomes the subject of an
investigation or disciplinary action by any financial services or securities regulatory authority or self-regulatory
authority. In the Netherlands, Pzena Investment Management, LLC avails itself of the Section 10 Exemption, which
allows U.S. investment managers to provide investment services to certain eligible Dutch clients. This exemption
subjects Pzena Investment Management, LLC to certain conduct of business requirements under the Dutch
regulations.
We operate in various other foreign jurisdictions without registration in reliance upon applicable exemptions
under the laws of those jurisdictions.
Available Information
We make available free of charge through our website, www.pzena.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments to those reports, and
other filings required under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). To retrieve these reports, and any
amendments thereto, visit the Investor Relations section of our website. The SEC maintains a website at
www.sec.gov. All of the materials we filed with the SEC may be accessed free of charge on the SEC's website
through its EDGAR page.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers, and Board of Directors committee charters (including the charters of the Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) are also available free of charge
through our website under "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance."
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The information on the Company's website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report,
or any other report we file with, or furnish to the SEC.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We face a variety of significant and diverse risks, many of which are inherent in our business. Described below
are the risks we currently believe could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flow.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our primary source of revenue is derived from management fees, which are directly tied to our assets under
management. Fluctuations in AUM therefore will directly impact our revenue.
Substantially all of our revenue is derived from management fees paid by our clients, based on a percentage of
the market value of our AUM. Any decline and/or significant impairment in AUM would greatly affect our revenue,
and could occur due to a variety of factors, including:
• Poor performance of our strategies: Poor performance of our investment strategies may result in decreased
market value of AUM. In addition, underperformance could impact our ability to maintain our existing
client base and develop new relationships, both of which could negatively impact AUM and revenue.
• Poor market environment: We expect our business may generate lower revenue in a depressed equities
market or general economic downturn as a result of depreciation of our AUM. Any decline in the market
value of securities held in client portfolios due to such adverse conditions would reduce AUM and lead to a
decrease in revenue. Investor sentiment in a poor equities market environment could also decrease inflows
and increase outflows from our investment strategies in favor of investments perceived as more attractive.
• Global market, economic, geo-political and other conditions: As a company that invests in both U.S. and
non-U.S. markets, and with a global client base, our business is subject to changing conditions in the global
financial markets, and may also be affected by domestic and international political, social and economic
conditions, any of which could negatively impact our investment performance, growth strategy and AUM.
See "Our global and non-U.S. strategies consist primarily of investments in the securities of issuers located
outside of the United States, which may involve foreign currency exchange, political, social and economic
uncertainties and risks" below.
• Termination of significant relationships: Our clients can generally terminate our advisory agreements or
reduce assets under management upon short notice and for any reason. Investors in the pooled funds that
we manage may also redeem their investments in the funds at any time without prior notice. As of
December 31, 2018, five client relationships represented 44% and 30% of our AUM and revenue,
respectively, including one client relationship which represents approximately 21% and 11% of our AUM
and revenue respectively. The termination of any of these relationships and outflow of money from our
pooled funds could significantly reduce our revenue, and we may not be able to establish relationships with
other clients in order to replace the lost revenue. There can also be no assurance that our agreements with
respect to these relationships will remain in place going forward.
• Defined benefit plans are declining: Defined benefit plans are declining as corporate plan sponsors are
decreasing their liabilities and shifting employee enrollment to defined contribution plans. Given the
reduction in funding and shift to defined contribution plans there is no guarantee that we will be successful
in increasing our penetration of the defined contribution market, which could limit our ability to grow our
AUM.
•
Intermediary dependence: New accounts sourced through consultant-led searches have been a large driver
of our inflows in the past, and are expected to be a major component of our inflows going forward. We
have also established relationships with certain mutual fund providers who have offered us opportunities to
access certain market segments through sub-investment advisory roles. Such consultants and mutual fund
providers routinely review and evaluate our organization and the services we offer, and poor evaluations
12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
may result in client outflows and impact our ability to attract new assets through such intermediaries. See
"Item 1 — Our Business Strategy — Work with Our Strong Consultant Relationships" and "Item 1 — Our
Client Relationships and Distribution Approach — Distribution Channels."
• Passive strategies, such as index and exchange-traded funds have grown substantially in relation to
active strategies: During the past decade investors have exhibited a desire for passive investment products
given their relative performance and lower fee structure compared to active strategies managed by
investment managers such as ourselves. If this market preference continues, existing and prospective clients
may choose to invest in passive investment products, our AUM may be negatively impacted.
We may face capacity constraints in certain of our strategies which may prevent us from accepting new investors
in those strategies.
Our ability to retain and grow assets as a firm has been, and will be, driven primarily by delivering attractive
investment results to our clients. As a consequence, we have prioritized, and will continue to prioritize, investment
performance over asset accumulation. Where we deemed it necessary, we have, in the past, closed certain strategies
to new investors in order to preserve capacity to effectively implement our concentrated investment strategies for the
benefit of existing clients. We may in the future close certain of our strategies to new investors or to new inflows
from existing investors. Any such closures may limit our future AUM growth and hence our revenue growth.
Market and competitive pressures to lower our advisory fees could lead to a decline in our profit and earnings.
Market and competitive pressures in recent years have created a trend towards lower management fees in the
asset management industry and there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current fee structure
going forward. As a result, a shift in the composition of our AUM from higher to lower fee-generating client
relationships would result in a decrease in revenue, even if our aggregate level of AUM remains unchanged or
increases.
A portion of our investment advisory revenue is also derived from performance fees. We generally earn
performance fees under certain client agreements according to the performance relative to an agreed-upon
benchmark. This fee structure results in a lower base fee but allows for us to earn higher fees if the investment
strategy outperforms the benchmark. Some performance-based fee arrangements include high-water mark
provisions, which generally provide that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target, it must
gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to
achieve the performance target for a particular period, we may not earn a performance fee for that period and for
accounts with a high-water mark provision, our ability to earn future performance fees may be impaired. During
fiscal years 2018 and 2017, we earned $2.9 million and $3.2 million in performance fees, respectively. An increase
in performance-based fee arrangements with clients could create greater fluctuations in our revenue and earnings.
In addition, certain accounts related to one retail client relationship have fulcrum fee arrangements. These fee
arrangements require a reduction in the base fee, or allow for a performance fee if the relevant investment strategy
underperforms or outperforms, respectively, the agreed-upon benchmark over the contract's measurement period,
which extends to three years. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized a reduction in base fees in the
amount of $0.2 million related to fulcrum fee arrangements. To the extent the three-year performance records of
these accounts fluctuate relative to their relevant benchmarks, the amount of base fees recognized may vary.
Increases in our expenses could lead to a decline in our profit margin and increase the volatility of our earnings.
Our expenses are subject to increase based on a variety of factors such as higher operating expenses resulting
from business expansion, product development and increased marketing efforts; higher compensation expense due
to increased competition for talent, headcount and seniority level; and related expenses to meet business and
regulatory needs. Some or all of these expenses may remain at higher levels for the foreseeable future, leading to
higher costs for our business. Fluctuations in expenses could impact our profit margins and contribute to earnings
volatility.
13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Loss of key employees, and difficulties in attracting qualified investment professionals, could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
The success of our business largely depends on the participation of Richard S. Pzena and the other members of
our Executive Committee. Their professional reputations, expertise in investing, and relationships with our clients
and within the investing community in the U.S. and abroad are critical to executing our business strategy and
attracting and retaining clients. The retention of these individuals is crucial to our future success. There is no
guarantee that they will not resign, join our competitors or form a competing company. The terms of the current
operating agreement of our operating company restrict each of these individuals from competing with us or
soliciting our clients or employees during the term of their employment with us and, in certain circumstances, for a
certain period thereafter. The penalty for breach of these restrictive covenants may be the forfeiture of a number of
Class B units held by the individual, and his permitted transferees, as of the earlier of the date of his breach or the
termination of his employment. Although we may seek specific performance of these restrictive covenants, there can
be no assurance that we would be successful in obtaining this relief. After this post-employment restrictive period,
we may not be able to prohibit them from competing with us or soliciting our clients or employees. Furthermore, we
do not carry any "key man" insurance that would provide us with proceeds in the event of the death or disability of
any of the above mentioned employees.
In addition to the participants mentioned above, our success also depends on our ability to retain the senior
members of our investment team and to recruit additional qualified investment professionals. We may not be
successful in our efforts to retain and recruit such individuals as the market for investment professionals is extremely
competitive. Our portfolio managers possess substantial experience and expertise in classic value investing and
maintain significant relationships with our clients. The loss of any of our senior investment professionals could limit
our ability to successfully execute our investment approach and to sustain the performance of our investment
strategies, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, client relationships and our revenue
and earnings.
Future growth of our business may place significant demands on our resources and employees and may increase
our expenses, risks and regulatory oversight.
Future growth of our business may place significant demands on our infrastructure, our investment team and
other employees, which may increase our expenses. In addition, we are required to continuously develop our
infrastructure in response to the increasing sophistication of the investment management market, as well as
compliance with legal and regulatory developments. We may face significant challenges in: maintaining and
developing adequate financial and operational controls; implementing new or updated information and financial
systems, and procedures and training; and managing and appropriately sizing our work force, and other components
of our business on a timely and cost-effective basis. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage the
growth of our business effectively, or that we will be able to continue to grow, and any failure to do so could
adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control expenses.
The potential inability of our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions could also constrain
our ability to expand our businesses and potentially raise regulatory issues. In recent years, we have substantially
upgraded and expanded the capabilities of our data processing systems and other operating technology, and we
expect that we may need to continue to upgrade and expand these capabilities in the future to avoid disruption of, or
constraints on, our operations.
We face risks, and corresponding potential costs and expenses, associated with conducting operations and
growing our business in numerous countries.
We offer investment management services in different regulatory jurisdictions around the world, and intend to
continue to expand our operations internationally. In order to remain competitive, we must be proactive and
prepared to deploy necessary resources when and where growth opportunities present themselves. If we lack the
necessary resources and/or personnel, we may be unable to take full advantage of strategic opportunities when they
appear and our strategic decisions may not be efficiently implemented. Meeting local requirements and complying
with local industry standards may also place additional demands on sales and compliance personnel and resources
that we may not be able to meet. Finding and hiring additional, well-qualified personnel and crafting and adopting
policies, procedures and controls to address local or regional requirements remain a challenge as we expand our
14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
operations internationally. Moreover, regulators could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might
restrict or otherwise impede our ability to offer our investment products in their respective markets. Any of these
requirements, activities, or needs could increase the costs and expenses we incur in a specific jurisdiction without
any corresponding increase in revenue and income from operating in such jurisdiction.
The investment management business is intensely competitive.
Competition in the investment management business is based on a variety of factors, including investment
performance; investor perception of an investment manager’s drive, focus and alignment of interests; quality of
service provided to clients and duration of client relationships; business reputation; and level of fees charged for
services. We compete in all aspects of our business with a large number of investment management firms,
commercial banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies and other financial institutions. Our competitive risks are
heightened by the fact that some of our competitors may implement investment styles that are viewed more
favorably than ours or they may invest in alternative asset classes which the markets may perceive as more attractive
than the public equity markets. If we are unable to compete effectively, our revenue could be reduced, and our
business could be materially affected.
We may not be successful in expanding into new investment strategies, markets and businesses.
We actively consider the opportunistic expansion of our businesses, but we may not be successful in any such
attempted expansion. Attempts to expand our businesses involve a number of risks, including entry into markets in
which we may have limited or no experience, increasing the demands on our operational systems, the broadening of
our geographic footprint, increasing the risks associated with conducting operations in non-U.S. jurisdictions and the
diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses.
We also may not be successful in identifying new investment strategies or geographic markets that increase our
profitability. Because we have not yet identified all of these potential new investment strategies, geographic markets
or businesses, we cannot identify all the risks we may face and the potential adverse consequences. We also do not
know how long it may take for us to expand, if we do so at all.
A change of control could result in termination of our investment advisory or sub-investment advisory
agreements.
Pursuant to the Investment Company Act, each of the investment advisory or sub-investment advisory
agreements for the SEC-registered mutual funds that we advise will automatically terminate upon their deemed
“assignment,” and a fund’s board and shareholders must approve a new agreement in order for us to continue to act
as its investment adviser or sub-investment adviser. In addition, pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act, each of
our investment advisory agreements for the separate accounts we manage contains a provision that states that the
agreement may not be “assigned” without the consent of the client. An "assignment," pursuant to both the
Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, could be deemed to occur upon a sale or transfer of a
controlling block of our voting securities. Such an assignment may be deemed to occur in the event that the holders
of the Class B units of our operating company exchange enough of their Class B units for shares of our Class A
common stock such that they no longer own a controlling interest in us. If such a deemed assignment occurs, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary consents from clients whose assets are managed
pursuant to separate accounts, or the necessary approvals from the boards and shareholders of the SEC-registered
funds that we sub-advise. An assignment, actual or constructive, would trigger these termination and consent
provisions and, unless the necessary approvals and consents are obtained, could adversely affect our ability to
continue managing client accounts, resulting in the loss of AUM and a corresponding loss of revenue.
Extensive regulation of our business has been and will be expensive and time consuming, and exposes us to the
potential for significant penalties, including fines or limitations on our ability to conduct our business.
We are subject to extensive regulation of our investment management business and operations. As a registered
investment adviser, the SEC oversees our activities pursuant to its regulatory authority under the Investment
Advisers Act. In addition, we must comply with certain requirements under the Investment Company Act with
respect to the SEC-registered funds for which we act as investment adviser or sub-investment adviser. As a
Category I License holder in South Africa, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority has regulatory oversight over our
practices and activities in South Africa. Pzena Financial Services, LLC, our SEC registered broker dealer subsidiary
is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). Each of the regulatory bodies with
15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
jurisdiction over us has the authority to regulate various aspects of financial services, including the authority to
grant, and, in specific circumstances to cancel, permissions to carry on particular businesses. Our failure to comply
with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions,
including revocation of our registration as an investment adviser. Even if a sanction imposed against us is small in
monetary amount, the adverse publicity arising from the imposition of such sanctions by regulators could harm our
reputation, result in withdrawal by our clients and/or impede our ability to retain clients and develop new client
relationships. As we continue to expand into the international market, we may also be under the regulatory scope of
local regulatory authorities and non-compliance with any of these authorities may result in fines, sanctions and
inability to operate in that local market.
The SEC and its staff continue to engage in various initiatives and reviews that seek to improve and modernize
the regulatory structure governing the asset management industry, and registered investment companies in
particular. During the past few years, the SEC proposed, among other things, enhanced reporting by investment
advisors, enhanced reporting on registered mutual funds and cyber security and new vendor concerns. While these
proposals have yet to be finalized into new rules, any new rules, guidance or regulatory initiatives resulting from
these efforts could expose us to additional compliance and reporting costs and may require us to change how we
operate our business or manages funds.
The United Kingdom (U.K.) and other European jurisdictions in which we operate have implemented the
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) rules into national legislation. MiFID II, which took effect on
January 3, 2018, builds upon many initiatives introduced through MiFID which primarily focused on equity trading
activity to migrate onto open and transparent markets. MiFID II has been implemented through a number of more
detailed directives, regulations and standards made by the European Commission and by the European Securities
Markets Authority (ESMA). MiFID II has significant impact on the European Union (EU) securities market,
including (i) enhanced investor protection and governance standards, (ii) rules regarding the ability of portfolio
management firms to receive and pay for investment research relating to all asset classes, (iii) an enhanced role for
ESMA in supervising EU securities, (iv) new requirements regarding non-EU investment firms’ access to EU
financial markets, as well as many other requirements for derivatives and trading activities. In particular, compliance
with MiFID II may increase costs and affect the manner in which our businesses obtain investment research
services.
The U.K.’s decision to exit the European Union following the June 2016 vote on the matter (referred to as
Brexit) may disrupt our business operations and impact our financial results and value of our investments. Brexit has
caused significant geo-political and legal uncertainty and market volatility in the U.K. and elsewhere, which has
continued during the Brexit negotiation process. Depending on the outcome of the Brexit negotiations, our ability to
market and provide services within the European Union could be restricted temporarily or in the long term. Our
contingency plans for certain Brexit scenarios require the cooperation of counterparties or a regulator of financial
services to make timely arrangements. We cannot guarantee that counterparties or regulators will cooperate or the
timeliness of their cooperation. Our operating expenses may increase as we implement our plan to continue to
market and provide our services and distribute our products in the short and/or long term.
In May 2018, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became effective. The
primary objectives of GDPR are to give citizens control of their personal data and to simplify the regulatory
environment for international business by unifying data protection regulation in the European Union. Compliance
with the stringent rules under GDPR requires continuous monitoring and evaluation of our global data processing.
Failure to comply with GDPR could result in fines up to the higher of 20 million Euros or 4% of annual global
revenues, regulatory action, and reputational risk.
We also face the risk of significant intervention by regulatory authorities, including extended investigation and
surveillance activity, adoption of costly or restrictive new regulations, and judicial or administrative proceedings
that may result in substantial penalties. The requirements imposed by our regulators are designed to ensure the
integrity of the financial markets and to protect customers and other third parties who deal with us, and are not
designed to protect our stockholders. Any regulatory and legislative actions and reforms affecting the investment
advisory industry may negatively impact earnings by increasing our costs of operations.
Specific regulatory changes also may have a direct impact on the revenue of our business. In addition to
regulatory scrutiny and potential fines and sanctions, regulators continue to examine different aspects of the asset
16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
management industry. For example, the use of “soft dollars,” where a portion of commissions paid to broker-dealers
in connection with the execution of trades also pays for research and other services provided to advisors, has been
reexamined by different regulatory bodies and may in the future be limited or modified. Although a substantial
portion of the research relied on by our business in the investment decision-making process is generated internally
by our investment analysts, external research, including external research paid for with soft dollars, is important to
the process. This external research generally is used for information gathering or verification purposes, and includes
broker-provided research, as well as third-party provided databases and research services. If the use
of soft dollars were to be limited, we would have to bear additional costs.
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our
financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
We are subject to income- as well as non-income-based taxes, in both the U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted into U.S. law in December 2017 included a permanent reduction in the corporate
income tax rate. This change in future tax rates caused the carrying value of our deferred tax assets to be lowered.
Furthermore, additional guidance and changes may be issued that may have a direct effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and liquidity. We are also subject to potential tax audits in various jurisdictions and
in such event, tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess penalties or additional
taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these potential audits in order to determine the appropriateness of
our tax provision; however, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these potential
audits. The actual outcomes of these potential audits could have a material impact on our net income or financial
condition and any changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate and earnings.
Certain changes in accounting and/or financial reporting standards issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC or other standard-setting bodies could have a material impact on our
reported financial position or results of our operations.
We are subject to the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”), which are periodically revised and/or expanded. As such, we are required to adopt new or revised
accounting and/or financial reporting standards issued by recognized accounting standard setters or regulators, such
as the FASB and the SEC. Changes associated with the adoption of revised financial reporting standards could have
a material impact on our reported financial position or results of our operations.
Inadequate business continuity plans, including those of our significant third-party vendors, could lead to
material financial loss, reputational harm and inability to continue business.
We rely heavily on our financial, accounting, trading, compliance and other data processing systems. Any
failure or interruption of these systems, whether caused by natural disaster, power or telecommunications failure, act
of terrorism or war or otherwise, could result in a disruption of our business, liability to clients, regulatory
intervention or reputational damage, and thus materially adversely affect our business. The back-up systems that we
have in place and other protective measures that we have taken may not be adequate in the event of a failure or
interruption.
We depend on our headquarters in New York City for the continued operation of our business. A disaster or a
disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business, or directly affecting our headquarters, may have a material
adverse impact on our ability to continue to operate our business without interruption.
We have a detailed business continuity plan in place that is tested on a quarterly basis. We strive to understand
the protective measures of our third-party vendors, however there can be no assurance that these measures will be
sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such a disaster or disruption.
Any significant security breach of our software applications, technology or other systems critical to our
operations, may disrupt our business or cause us to lose sensitive and confidential information which in turn may
cause reputational and financial harm.
We are dependent on the effectiveness of our, and our third-party vendors', information and cyber security
infrastructure, policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the
data that resides in or is transmitted through them. As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit
confidential information about our clients as well as proprietary information relating to our business operations. We
17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
maintain a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that fraudulent activity, including
misappropriation of assets, fraudulent financial reporting, and unauthorized access to sensitive or confidential data is
either prevented or detected in a timely manner. We are continuously working to install new, and upgrade existing,
information technology systems and provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware, and other
cyber risks to ensure that we are protected, to the greatest extent possible, against cyber risks and security breaches.
We also strive to understand the protective measures of our third-party vendors and ensure that we have
complementary user controls in place to mitigate risk, however our information technology systems may still be
vulnerable to unauthorized access or may be corrupted by cyber-attacks, computer viruses or other malicious
software code, or authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary
information. Although we take precautions to password protect and/or encrypt our electronic hardware, if such
hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use,
creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly consequences to us. A breach of our technology
systems could result in the loss of valuable information, liability for stolen assets or information, remediation costs
to repair damage caused by the breach, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and legal costs
resulting from the incident. Moreover, loss of confidential customer information could harm our reputation, result in
the termination of contracts by our existing customers and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential
data, resulting in loss of revenue.
The individuals, counterparties or issuers on whom we rely to perform services for us may be unable or unwilling
to honor their contractual obligations to us.
We rely on various third parties and other vendors to fulfill their obligations to us, whether specified by
contract, course of dealing or otherwise. Disruptions in the financial markets and other economic challenges may
cause our counterparties and other vendors to experience significant cash flow problems or even render them
insolvent, which may expose us to credit, operational or other risk.
Operational risk, such as trade errors or system limitations or failures, may create significant financial impact to
us, hamper future growth and cause potential reputational harm.
We face potential operational risk from our management of client assets and daily business. Risks include errors
that may occur during the execution, confirmation or settlement phase of transactions and such errors may cause
material financial loss, which in turn may cause material financial and reputational harm to us. We also face the
potential of inaccurate recording of transactions in our internal systems, caused by human error, system limitations
or system malfunctions. Such errors may involve client and public reporting, execution, confirmation and
settlement of trades, and billing. The potential for operational risk could have significant regulatory, financial or
reputational impact. There can be no assurance that all risks and errors can be prevented.
We are exposed to legal risks which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us. Additionally, litigation may result in higher insurance
premiums and increased insurance coverage risks which could increase our costs and reduce our profitability.
We depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our reputation for integrity and high-
caliber professional services to attract and retain clients. As a result, dissatisfaction with our services could be more
damaging to our business than to other types of businesses. If our clients suffer significant losses, or are otherwise
dissatisfied with our services, such as for breach of trading guidelines and/or perceived conflicts of interest, we
could be subject to the risk of legal liabilities or actions alleging negligent misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty, or
breach of contract. These risks are often difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often
remain unknown for substantial periods of time.
18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
While we strive to conduct our business in accordance with the highest ethical standards, we are always open to
the risk of litigation by parties in addition to our clients, for instance by our shareholders, employees and regulators.
We may incur significant legal expenses in defending against litigation. Substantial legal liability or significant
regulatory action against us could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations, or cause significant reputational harm to us.
Potential regulatory and governmental inquiries, civil litigation or employment-related claims could involve
substantial financial penalties. Certain insurance coverage may not be available or may be prohibitively expensive in
future periods. As our insurance policies come up for renewal, we may need to assume higher deductibles or co-
insurance liabilities, or pay higher premiums, which could increase our expenses and could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Insurance coverage may not protect us from all of the liabilities that could arise from the risks inherent in our
business.
We maintain insurance coverage focused on reducing potential losses related to our operations. We purchase
insurance in amounts, and against risks, that we consider appropriate. There can be no assurance, however, that a
claim or claims will be completely covered by insurance or, if covered at all, will not exceed the limits of our
existing insurance coverage. If a loss occurs that is partially or completely uninsured, we may be exposed to
substantial liability. Insurance costs are impacted by market conditions and our risk profile, and may increase
significantly over relatively short periods. Renewals of insurance policies may result in additional costs through
higher premiums or the assumption of higher deductibles or co-insurance liability. In addition, insurance and other
safeguards might only partially reimburse us for our losses in the event our business continuity plan fails and our
operations are significantly disrupted.
Risks Related to Our Investment Strategies and Process
Our classic value investment style subjects us to the risk that the companies in which we invest may not achieve
the level of earnings recovery that we initially expect, or at all.
We generally invest in companies after they have experienced, or are expected by the market to soon
experience, a shortfall in their historic earnings, due to an adverse business development, management error,
accounting scandal or other disruption, and before there is clear evidence of earnings recovery or business
momentum. While investors are generally less willing to invest when companies lack earnings visibility, our classic
value investment approach seeks to capture the return that can be obtained by investing in a company before the
market has confidence in its ability to achieve earnings recovery. However, our investment approach entails the risk
that the companies included in our portfolios are not able to execute as we had expected when we originally invested
in them, thereby reducing the performance of our strategies. Since our positions in these investments are often
substantial, even partial sales of a substantial position into the market may cause the market price of our investment
to decline and there is the risk that we may be unable to find willing purchasers for our investments when we decide
to sell them.
19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Since we apply the same investment process across all of our investment strategies, utilizing one analyst team,
and given the overlapping universes of many of our investment strategies, we could have common positions and
industry or sector concentrations across many of our investment strategies at the same time. As such, factors leading
one of our investment strategies to underperform may lead other strategies to underperform simultaneously.
Our global and non-U.S. strategies may consist of investments in the securities of issuers located outside of the
United States, which may involve foreign currency exchange, political, social and economic uncertainties and
risks.
Our global and non-U.S. strategies, which together represented $18.9 billion and $20.6 billion of our AUM as
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, are primarily invested in securities of companies located outside the
United States. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 45% of our assets under management were invested in
securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Investments in non-U.S. issuers may be affected by
political, social and economic uncertainty affecting a country or region in which we are invested. Many emerging
financial markets are not as developed, or as efficient, as the U.S. financial market, and, as a result, liquidity may be
reduced and price volatility may increase. The legal and regulatory environments, including financial accounting
standards and practices, may also be different, and there may be less publicly available information in respect of
such companies. These risks could adversely impact the performance of our strategies that are invested in securities
of non-U.S. issuers. In addition, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may affect investment return and
AUM since we do not engage in currency hedging for these portfolios. Due to these factors, our AUM may fluctuate
from one reporting period to another causing volatility in earnings.
Our investment approach may underperform other investment approaches during certain market conditions.
Our products are best suited for investors with long-term investment horizons. In accordance with our classic
value investment approach, we typically hold securities for an average of three to five years. Our strategies may not
perform well during points in the economic cycle when value-oriented stocks are relatively less attractive. For
instance, during the late stages of an economic cycle, investors may purchase relatively expensive stocks in order to
obtain access to above average growth. Value-oriented strategies may also experience weakness during periods
when the markets are focused on one investment thesis or sector.
Even when securities prices are rising generally, portfolio performance can be affected by our investment
approach. The classic value approach has outperformed the market in some economic and market environments and
underperformed it in others. In particular, a prolonged period in which the growth-style of investing outperforms the
value-style may cause our investment strategy to go out of favor with clients, consultants and sub-advised
relationships. Our investment strategy may be less favored during certain time periods for other reasons as well,
including due to perceived riskiness or volatility of our approach. Poor performance relative to peers, coupled with
changes in personnel, extensive periods in particular market environments, or other difficulties may result in a
decline in our AUM.
Our investment process requires us to conduct extensive fundamental research on any company before investing,
which may result in missed investment opportunities and reduce the performance of our investment strategies.
We take a considerable amount of time to complete the in-depth research projects that our investment process
requires before adding any security to our portfolio. Our process requires that we take this time to understand the
company and the business well enough to make an informed decision as to whether we are willing to own a
significant position in a company that does not yet have clear earnings visibility. However, the time we take to make
this judgment may cause us to miss the opportunity to invest in a company that has a sharp and rapid earnings
recovery. Any such missed investment opportunities could adversely impact the performance of our investment
strategies.
20
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Risks Related to Our Structure
We are dependent upon distributions from Pzena Investment Management, LLC to make distributions to our
Class A stockholders, and to pay taxes and other expenses.
We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of membership units of our
operating company. We have no independent means of generating revenue and cash flow. Our operating company is
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, is not itself subject to U.S. federal income
tax. Instead, its taxable income is allocated to its members, including us, pro-rata according to the number of
membership units each member owns. Accordingly, we incur income taxes on our proportionate share of any
taxable income of our operating company. We also incur expenses related to our operations. We intend to have our
operating company distribute cash to its members in an amount at least equal to that necessary to cover their tax
liabilities, if any, with respect to the earnings of our operating company. To the extent we need funds to pay our tax
or other liabilities or to fund our operations, and our operating company is restricted from making distributions to us
under applicable laws or regulations, or contractual restrictions, or does not have sufficient earnings to make these
distributions, we may have to borrow funds to meet these obligations and run our business and, thus, our liquidity
and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. There can be no assurance that funds will be
available to borrow under such circumstances on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
We are required to pay most of the tax benefit of any amortization deductions we may claim as a result of the tax
basis step up we receive in connection with the sales of membership units and any exchanges of Class B units
and this tax treatment could be challenged by tax authorities.
As part of the reorganization we implemented with our initial public offering ("IPO"), we purchased
membership units of our operating company from three of its members (the "Selling Members"). In addition, holders
of Class B units may, at least once each year, exchange their Class B units of our operating company for shares of
our Class A common stock. These purchases and subsequent exchanges have resulted, and are expected to continue
to result, in increases in our share of the tax basis in the tangible and intangible assets of our operating company that
otherwise would not have been available. These increases in tax basis have reduced, and are expected to continue to
reduce, the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future, although the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") might challenge all or part of this tax basis increase, and a court might sustain such a challenge.
Pursuant to a tax receivable agreement dated October 30, 2007, among us, the Selling Members, and all holders
of Class B units after our IPO, we are required to pay the Selling Members, and certain holders of Class B units who
elect to exchange their Class B units for shares of our Class A common stock, 85% of the amount of the cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we realize as a result of the increases in amortizable
tax basis due to the sale to us of their membership units. The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and
timing of any payments under this agreement, may vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of
exchanges, the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges
are taxable, the amount and timing of our income, and the tax rates and related laws then applicable. Payments under
the tax receivable agreement are expected to give rise to certain additional tax benefits attributable to further
increases in basis. Any such benefits are covered by the tax receivable agreement and may increase the amounts due
thereunder. We expect that, as a result of the size and increases in our share of the tax basis in the tangible and
intangible assets of our operating company attributable to our interest therein, the payments that we may make to
these members likely may be substantial.
If we exercise our right to terminate the tax receivable agreement early, we may be obligated to make an early
termination payment to the selling and converting shareholders, based upon the net present value of all payments
that would be required to be paid by us. If certain change of control events were to occur, we would also be
obligated to make an early termination payment.
Were the IRS to successfully challenge the tax basis increases described above, we would not be reimbursed for
any payments made under the tax receivable agreement. As a result, in certain circumstances, we could be required
to make payments under the tax receivable agreement in excess of our cash tax savings.
21
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock
The market price and trading volume of our Class A common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid
and substantial losses for our stockholders.
The market price of our Class A common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile and subject to
wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume of our Class A common stock may fluctuate and cause significant
price variations to occur. If the market price of our Class A common stock declines significantly, you may be unable
to resell your shares of our Class A common stock at or above your purchase price, if at all. We cannot assure you
that the market price of our Class A common stock may not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
The market price of our Class A common stock could decline due to the large number of shares of our Class A
common stock eligible for future sale upon the exchange of Class B units of our operating company or future
issuance of shares of Class A common stock.
Pursuant to the operating agreement of our operating company, on at least one date designated by us each year,
certain holders of Class B units generally may exchange up to 15% of certain of their Class B units for an equivalent
number of shares of our Class A common stock, subject to certain restrictions and conditions set forth in the
operating agreement. Also, since 2011, the non-employee members of our operating company may exchange all of
their vested Class B units, in accordance with the timing restrictions set forth in the operating agreement.
Pursuant to the resale and registration rights agreement, dated October 30, 2007, among the holders of Class B
units and us, these holders may resell the shares of Class A common stock issued to them upon the exchange of their
Class B units as discussed above.
During 2018, we established December 21, 2018 as an exchange date. Certain employee members, non-
employee members and permitted transferees, elected to exchange an aggregate of 1,141,663 of their Class B units
for an equivalent number of shares of our Class A common stock, which are freely tradable. As of December 31,
2018, there remained 51,302,126 shares of our Class A common stock that have previously been registered in
various registration statements filed with the SEC, which may be issued upon the exchange of currently outstanding
Class B units as discussed above. An additional 10,859,317 shares of Class A common stock are registered relating
to Class B units that have not been issued.
Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could discourage a
change of control that our stockholders may favor, which could also adversely affect the market price of our
Class A common stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may make it more difficult and
expensive for a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our
stockholders. For example, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors
to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of our preferred stock and to designate the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions of unissued series of our preferred stock, each without any vote or action by our stockholders. We could
issue a series of preferred stock to impede the consummation of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt.
The anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may impede
takeover attempts, or other transactions, that may be in the best interests of our stockholders and, in particular, our
Class A stockholders. In addition, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected to the
extent that provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws discourage potential
takeover attempts, or other transactions, that our stockholders may favor.
22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The disparity in the voting rights among the classes of our common stock may have a potential adverse effect on
the price of our Class A common stock and may give rise to conflicts of interest.
Our Class B stockholders collectively hold approximately 93% of the combined voting power of our common
stock. These stockholders consist of our named executive officers, 40 of our other employees (directly or through
their interests in Pzena Investment Management, LP), the estate planning vehicles of our named executive officers
and certain of our other employees, certain other members of our operating company, including one of our directors
and his related entities, and former employees (directly or through their interests in Pzena Investment Management,
LP). Holders of shares of our Class B common stock have entered into a Class B Stockholders’ Agreement with
respect to all shares of Class B common stock then held by them and any additional shares of Class B common stock
they may acquire in the future. Pursuant to this agreement, they may vote these shares of Class B common stock
together on all matters submitted to a vote of our common stockholders. To the extent that we cause our operating
company to issue additional Class B units, which may be granted, subject to vesting, to our employees pursuant to
the PIM LLC 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, these employees will be entitled to receive an equivalent number of shares
of our Class B common stock, subject to the condition that they agree to enter into this Class B Stockholders’
Agreement. Each share of our Class B common stock entitles its holder to five votes per share for so long as the
Class B stockholders collectively hold 20% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding. When a
Class B unit is exchanged for a share of our Class A common stock, an unvested Class B unit is forfeited due to the
employee holder’s failure to satisfy the conditions of the award agreement pursuant to which it was granted, or any
Class B unit is forfeited as a result of a breach of any restrictive covenants contained in our operating company’s
amended and restated operating agreement, a corresponding share of our Class B common stock will automatically
be redeemed by us.
For so long as our Class B stockholders hold at least 20% of the total number of shares of our common stock
outstanding, they will be able to elect all of the members of our Board of Directors and thereby control our
management and affairs, including determinations with respect to acquisitions, dispositions, borrowings, issuances
of securities, and the declaration and payment of dividends. In addition, they will be able to determine the outcome
of all matters requiring approval of stockholders, and will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of our
Company or a change in the composition of our Board of Directors, and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition
of our Company. Our Class B stockholders have the ability to prevent the consummation of mergers, takeovers or
other transactions that may be in the best interests of our Class A stockholders. In particular, this concentration of
voting power could deprive Class A stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of Class A
common stock as part of a sale of our company, and could ultimately affect the market price of our Class A common
stock.
Each share of our Class A common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters to be voted on by
stockholders. This difference in voting rights could adversely affect the value of our Class A common stock to the
extent that investors view, or any potential future purchaser of our company views, the superior voting rights of the
Class B common stock to have more value.
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and may be limited by our
holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law.
We currently intend to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis and our Board of Directors has targeted a cash
dividend payout ratio of approximately 60% to 70% of annual non-GAAP earnings per share, subject to growth
initiatives and other funding needs. However, our Board of Directors may, in its discretion, modify the level of
dividends, or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely. Furthermore, we are a holding company, and depend
upon the ability of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, our operating company, to generate earnings and cash
flows and distribute them to us so that we may pay our obligations and expenses and pay dividends to our
stockholders. We expect to cause Pzena Investment Management, LLC to make distributions to its members,
including us. However, the ability of Pzena Investment Management, LLC to make such distributions is subject to
its operating results, cash requirements and financial condition, and applicable Delaware laws (which may limit the
amount of funds available for distribution to its members), as well as any contractual restrictions. If, as a
consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we do not receive distributions from our operating
company, we may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate, the payment of dividends on our Class A
common stock. Because of these various limitations and restrictions, we have, in the past, had to suspend our
23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
quarterly dividend payment. See “Item 5 — Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Our Dividend Policy.”
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of the date of this Annual Report, our corporate headquarters and principal offices are located at 320 Park
Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10022. On December 1, 2018, we entered into an amendment to our lease
providing us with additional space in the same building where we now occupy approximately 40,300 square feet out
of approximately 45,050 square feet of space under a non-cancellable operating lease, the term of which expires on
December 31, 2025. The Company entered into a new sublease agreement commencing on February 1, 2019 and
expiring on December 31, 2025 that is cancelable by either the Company or sublessee given appropriate notice on
the second anniversary of the commencement of the sublease agreement, and annually thereafter.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, we may be subject to various legal and administrative proceedings.
Currently, there are no material legal proceedings pending against us that we believe may have a material effect
on our business, cash flow or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.
24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Class A common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the
symbol “PZN.” As of March 7, 2019, there were approximately 35 record holders of our Class A common stock and
34 record holders of our Class B common stock. These numbers do not include shareholders who hold their shares
through one or more intermediaries, such as banks, brokers or depositories.
Our Dividend Policy
Our Board of Directors has targeted a cash dividend payout ratio of approximately 60% to 70% of our non-
GAAP diluted net income, subject to growth initiatives and other funding needs. However, our Board of Directors
may, in its discretion, modify the level of dividends, or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely.
We use annual non-GAAP earnings measures, discussed in further detail in “Item 7 — Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Net Income” in Part II of this Annual
Report, to assess the strength of the underlying operations of the business. Included in our annual results are certain
tax related and non-recurring adjustments that we feel add a measure of non-operational complexity to our results as
reported under GAAP and obscure the underlying performance of the business. Management therefore does not
consider these adjustments when evaluating operating results or financial information in any given period, and
instead uses non-GAAP measures of earnings, which exclude these items, to analyze our operations between
periods, and over time, and to evaluate the financial condition and results of operations. Investors should consider
the non-GAAP measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with
GAAP.
As a holding company, we have no material assets other than our ownership of membership interests in our
operating company. As a result, we depend upon distributions from our operating company to pay any dividends
that our Board of Directors may declare to be paid to our Class A common stockholders, if any. When and if our
Board of Directors declares any such dividends, we then cause our operating company to make distributions to us in
an amount sufficient to cover the dividends declared. We may not pay dividends to our Class A common
stockholders in amounts that have been paid to them in the past, or at all, if, among other things, we do not have the
cash necessary to pay our intended dividends, or any of our financing facilities or other agreements restrict us from
doing so. To the extent we do not have cash on hand sufficient to pay dividends in the future, we may decide not to
pay dividends.
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to Board of Director discretion and may be limited by our holding
company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors — Risks Related to
Our Class A Common Stock — Our ability to pay dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors
and may be limited by our holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law.”
25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 24, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase an aggregate of $10.0 million of our
outstanding Class A common stock in the open market and Class B units of the operating company in private
transactions in accordance with applicable securities laws. On February 5, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized
us to repurchase an additional $20.0 million of our outstanding Class A common stock and Class B units of the
operating company. On April 19, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved an additional
increase of $30.0 million in the aggregate amount authorized under the program. The timing, number, and value of
common shares and units repurchased are subject to our discretion. Our share repurchase program is not subject to
an expiration date and may be suspended, discontinued, or modified at any time, or for any reason. Shares
repurchased under the repurchase program during the fourth quarter of 2018 are as follows:
Period
October 1, 2018 through
October 31, 2018
November 1, 2018 through
November 30, 2018
December 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018
Total
(a) Total Number of
Shares of Class A
Common
Stock Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share of Class A
Common
Stock
(c) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
(d) Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs(1)
(in millions)
40,608 $
9.40
40,608 $
—
77,143
117,751 $
—
9.23
9.29
—
77,143
117,751 $
27.7
27.5
26.6
26.6
(1) The dollar amount in the column entitled "Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs,"
reflects the remainder of the program and also reflects the repurchase of 14,124 and 30,066 of the operating company's Class B units during
November and December 2018, respectively, for an average price of $10.23 and $6.82 per unit, respectively. Class B units are repurchased
at fair value determined by reference to our Class A common stock on the date of the transaction since Class B units are exchangeable for
shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis and adjusted for the impact of award terms on the value of the award.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial data of Pzena Investment Management,
Inc. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and
the selected consolidated statements of financial condition data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, have been
derived from Pzena Investment Management, Inc.’s audited consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report.
The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
and the selected consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, have been
derived from Pzena Investment Management, Inc.’s audited consolidated financial statements not included in this
report.
You should read the following selected historical consolidated financial data together with “Item 7 —
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the historical
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Annual Report.
26
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2018
For the Years Ended December 31,
2015
2016
2017
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2014
$
108,675
3,836
112,511
138,136 $
3,159
141,295
150,700 $
2,879
153,579
108,129 $
207
108,336
112,102 $
4,505
116,607
Statements of Operations Data:
REVENUE
Management Fees
Performance Fees
Total Revenue
EXPENSES
Cash Compensation and Benefits
Other Non-Cash Compensation
Total Compensation and Benefits Expense
General and Administrative Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating Income
Other (Expense)/ Income
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Provision
Consolidated Net Income
Less: Net Income Attributable to
Non-Controlling Interests
NET INCOME Attributable to Pzena
Investment Management, Inc.
Per Share Data1:
8,100
13,794 $
Net Income for Basic Earnings per Share
0.64
0.78 $
Basic Earnings per Share
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding 17,678,874 17,338,348 15,962,902 14,014,219 12,628,676
41,397
6,933
48,330
12,788
61,118
47,218
(48,042)
(824)
(54,475)
53,651
35,431
11,092
46,523
14,667
61,190
55,417
(3,300)
52,117
5,114
47,003
51,600
9,819
61,419
13,405
74,824
78,755
(2,658)
76,097
7,778
68,319
48,722
10,182
58,904
13,337
72,241
69,054
25,608
94,662
34,512
60,150
32,396
8,877
41,273
10,285
51,558
60,953
(4,036)
56,917
1,883
55,034
16,179 $
1.01 $
7,679 $
0.55 $
6,908 $
0.40 $
16,179 $
13,794 $
39,324
54,525
37,472
7,679 $
53,242
46,934
6,908 $
8,100
$
$
$
Net Income for Diluted Earnings per Share
Diluted Earnings per Share2
Diluted Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding
$
$
55,347 $
0.77 $
40,064 $
0.40 $
39,600 $
0.58 $
33,809 $
0.50 $
35,685
0.53
71,934,144 70,934,362 68,849,172 68,126,786 67,797,524
Cash Dividends Declared Per Share
$
0.51 $
0.37 $
0.41 $
0.41 $
0.35
(1) The operating company issues shares of Class A common stock and Class B units that have non-forfeitable dividend rights. Under the “two-
class method,” these shares and units are considered participating securities and are required to be included in the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share.
(2) During the year ended December 31, 2017, the calculation of diluted earnings per share resulted in an increase in earnings per share.
Therefore, diluted earnings per share is assumed to be equal to basic earnings per share. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements
beginning on page F-22 of this Annual Report for further details.
2018
2017
As of December 31,
2016
(in thousands)
2015
2014
Statements of Financial Condition Data:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
TOTAL ASSETS
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Non-Controlling Interests
EQUITY
$ 38,099 $ 63,414 $ 43,522 $ 35,417 $ 39,109
170,976 169,047 179,121 114,309 111,886
26,853
66,632
18,401
28,847
67,040
18,422
97,787
52,841
28,493
69,758
66,985
32,304
71,968
66,006
33,002
27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are an investment management firm that utilizes a classic value investment approach across all of our
investment strategies. We currently manage assets in a variety of value-oriented investment strategies across a wide
range of market capitalizations in both U.S. and non-U.S. capital markets. At December 31, 2018, our assets under
management, or AUM, was approximately $33.4 billion. We manage separate accounts on behalf of institutions, act
as sub-investment adviser for a variety of SEC-registered mutual funds and non-U.S. funds, and act as investment
adviser for the Pzena mutual funds, certain private placement funds and non-U.S. funds.
We function as the sole managing member of our operating company, Pzena Investment Management, LLC (the
“operating company”). As a result, we: (i) consolidate the financial results of our operating company with our own,
and reflect the membership interest in it that we do not own as a non-controlling interest in our consolidated
financial statements; and (ii) recognize income generated from our economic interest in our operating company’s net
income. As of December 31, 2018, the holders of our Class A common stock and the holders of Class B units of our
operating company held approximately 26.4% and 73.6%, respectively, of the economic interests in the operations
of our business.
The Company also serves as the general partner of Pzena Investment Management, LP, a partnership formed
with the objective of aggregating employee ownership in one entity.
Our named executive officers and certain of our employees have interests in Pzena Investment Management, LP
and certain estate planning vehicles through which they indirectly own Class B units of our operating company. As
of December 31, 2018, through direct and indirect interests, our three named executive officers; 40 other employee
members; and certain other members of our operating company, including one of our directors, his related entities,
and certain former employees, collectively held 49.9%, 4.6%, and 19.1% of the economic interests in our operating
company, respectively.
Net Income
GAAP diluted net income and GAAP diluted earnings per share were $55.3 million and $0.77, respectively, for
the year ended December 31, 2018, and $40.1 million and $0.40, respectively, for the year ended December 31,
2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the calculation of diluted earnings per share resulted in an increase
in earnings per share. Therefore, diluted earnings per share is assumed to be equal to basic earnings per share.
In evaluating the results of operations, we also review non-GAAP measures of earnings, which are adjusted to
exclude accounting items that add a measure of non-operational complexity which obscures the underlying
performance of the business. For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, earnings were adjusted to exclude
changes in the deferred tax asset and corresponding liability to the Company's selling and converting shareholders
associated with a change in the calculation of historical 754 step-ups. For the year ended December 31, 2017,
earnings were also adjusted to exclude the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in the fourth quarter of
2017. We use these non-GAAP measures to assess the strength of the underlying operations of the business. We
believe that these adjustments, and the non-GAAP measures derived from them, provide information to better
analyze our operations between periods, and over time. Investors should consider these non-GAAP measures in
addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
As adjusted, non-GAAP diluted net income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share were $55.6 million and
$0.77, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018, and $44.7 million and $0.63, respectively, for the year
ended December 31, 2017. GAAP and non-GAAP net income for diluted earnings per share generally assumes all
operating company membership units are converted into Company stock at the beginning of the reporting period,
and the resulting change to our GAAP and non-GAAP net income associated with our increased interest in the
operating company is taxed at our historical effective tax rate, exclusive of the adjustments related to our tax
receivable agreement and the associated liability to selling and converting shareholders, the adjustments related to
the non-recurring charges recognized in operating expenses, and other adjustments as noted above. Our effective
28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
tax rate, exclusive of these adjustments, was 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2018 and approximately 36.7%
for the year ended December 31, 2017. See “Operating Results — Income Tax Expense” below.
A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures is included below:
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
GAAP Net Income
Net Expense as a result of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations1
Non-GAAP Net Income
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
GAAP Basic Earnings per Share
Net Expense as a result of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations1
Non-GAAP Basic Earnings per Share
$
(in thousands, except share and
per share amounts)
13,794 $
—
246
14,040 $
6,908
5,649
(1,006)
11,551
$
17,678,874 17,338,348
0.40
$
0.33
(0.06)
0.67
0.78 $
—
0.01
0.79 $
$
GAAP Net Income for Diluted Earnings per Share
Net Expense as a result of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations1
Non-GAAP Net Income for Diluted Earnings per Share
$
$
55,347 $
—
246
55,593 $
40,063
5,649
(1,006)
44,706
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
GAAP Diluted Earnings per Share
Net Expense as a result of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations1
Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings per Share
71,934,144 70,934,362
0.56
$
0.08
(0.01)
0.63
0.77 $
—
—
0.77 $
$
1
Reflects the net impact of a change in the calculation of historical 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset and corresponding liability to
selling and converting shareholders recognized during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as noted in the income tax expense
discussion below.
Revenue
We generate revenue primarily from management fees and performance fees, which we collectively refer to as
our advisory fees, by managing assets on behalf of our separately managed and sub-advised accounts, as well as our
Pzena funds. Our advisory fee income is primarily based on our AUM, as discussed below, and is recognized over
the period in which investment management services are provided. In accordance with Revenue Recognition Topic
of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”), income from
performance fees is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period, when it is probable that
significant reversal of the performance fee will not occur. Upon adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018,
advisory fee income also includes fund expense cap reimbursements which are required to be presented net against
revenue rather than as a component of general and administrative expense.
Our advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of our AUM. Our AUM increases or decreases with the net
inflows or outflows of funds into our various investment strategies and with the investment performance thereof. In
order to increase our AUM and expand our business, we must develop and market investment strategies that suit the
investment needs of our target clients, and provide attractive returns over the long-term. The value and composition
of our AUM, and our ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors as described in “Item
1 — Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business — Our primary source of revenue is derived from management
29
TABLE OF CONTENTS
fees, which are directly tied to our assets under management. Fluctuations in AUM therefore will directly impact our
revenue."
For our separately managed accounts, we are paid management fees according to a schedule, which varies by
investment strategy. The substantial majority of these accounts pay us management fees pursuant to a schedule in
which the rate we earn on the AUM declines as the amount of AUM increases.
Pursuant to our sub-investment advisory agreements, we are generally paid a management fee according to a
schedule in which the rate we earn on the AUM declines as the amount of AUM increases. Certain of these funds
pay us fixed-rate management fees. Due to the substantially larger account size of certain of these sub-advised
accounts, the average advisory fees we earn on them, as a percentage of AUM, are lower than the advisory fees we
earn on our separately managed accounts.
Advisory fees we earn on separately managed accounts and Pzena funds are generally based on the value of
AUM at a specific date on a quarterly basis. Certain of our separately managed accounts, sub-advised accounts, and
Pzena funds are calculated based on the average of the monthly or daily market value. Advisory fees are also
generally adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than 10% of
the value of the portfolio. While a specific group of accounts may use the same fee rate, the calculation
methodology may differ as described above.
Certain of our clients pay us performance fees according to the performance of their accounts relative to certain
agreed-upon benchmarks, which results in a lower base fee, but allows for us to earn higher fees if the relevant
investment strategy outperforms the agreed-upon benchmark. Some performance-based fee arrangements include
high-water mark provisions, which generally provide that if a client account underperforms relative to its
performance target, it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees.
Fulcrum fee arrangements related to one client relationship require a reduction in the base fee, or allow for a
performance fee if the relevant investment strategy underperforms or outperforms, respectively, the agreed-upon
benchmark.
Our advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:
•
•
•
•
changes in AUM due to appreciation or depreciation of our investment portfolios, and the levels of the
contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;
distribution of AUM among our investment strategies, which have differing fee schedules;
distribution of AUM between separately managed accounts and sub-advised accounts, for which we
generally earn lower overall advisory fees; and
the level of our performance with respect to accounts on which we are paid performance fees or have
fulcrum fee arrangements.
Expenses
Our expenses consist primarily of Compensation and Benefits Expense, as well as General and Administrative
Expense. Our largest expense is Compensation and Benefits, which includes the salaries, bonuses, equity-based
compensation, and related benefits and payroll costs attributable to our employee members and employees.
Compensation and benefits packages are benchmarked against relevant industry and geographic peer groups in order
to attract and retain qualified personnel. General and Administrative Expense includes lease expenses, professional
and outside services fees, depreciation, costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and
portfolio accounting systems, and other expenses. Our occupancy-related costs and professional services expenses,
in particular, generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the overall size and scale of our business
operations.
We incur additional expenses associated with being a public company for, among other things, director and
officer insurance, director fees, SEC reporting and compliance (including Sarbanes-Oxley compliance), professional
fees, transfer agent fees, and other similar expenses.
30
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Our expenses may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the following:
•
•
variations in the level of total compensation expense due to, among other things, bonuses, awards of equity
to our employees and employee members of our operating company, changes in our employee count and
mix, and competitive factors; and
general and administrative expenses, such as professional service fees, rent, and data-related costs,
incurred, as necessary, to run our business.
Other (Expense)/ Income
Other (expense)/ income is derived primarily from investment income or loss arising from our consolidated
subsidiaries and interest income generated on our cash balances. Other (expense)/ income is also affected by
changes in our estimates of the liability due to our selling and converting shareholders associated with payments
owed to them under the tax receivable agreement which was executed in connection with our reorganization and
initial public offering on October 30, 2007. As discussed further below under “Tax Receivable Agreement,” this
liability represents 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state, and local income tax that we
realize as a result of the amortization of the increases in tax basis generated from our acquisitions of our operating
company’s units from our selling and converting shareholders. We expect the interest and investment components
of other (expense)/ income, in the aggregate, to fluctuate based on market conditions and the performance of our
consolidated subsidiaries and other investments.
Non-Controlling Interests
We are the sole managing member of our operating company and control its business and affairs and, therefore,
consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of our employees' and outside investors' direct and indirect
interests in our operating company (as noted in "Item 1 — Business — Overview"), we have reflected their
membership interests as a non-controlling interest in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31,
2018, the holders of our Class A common stock and the holders of Class B units of our operating company held
approximately 26.4% and 73.6%, respectively, of the economic interests in the operations of our business. In
addition, our operating company consolidates the results of operations of the private investment partnerships and
Pzena-branded mutual funds over which we exercise a controlling influence. Non-controlling interests recorded in
our consolidated financial statements include the non-controlling interests of the outside investors in these
consolidated subsidiaries.
31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Operating Results
Assets Under Management and Flows
As of December 31, 2018, our approximately $33.4 billion of AUM was invested in a variety of value-oriented
investment strategies, representing distinct capitalization segments of U.S. and non-U.S. equity markets. The
performance of our largest investment strategies as of December 31, 2018 is further described below. We follow the
same investment process for each of these strategies. Our investment strategies are distinguished by the market
capitalization ranges from which we select securities for their portfolios, which we refer to as each strategy’s
investment universe, as well as the regions in which we invest and the degree to which we concentrate on a limited
number of holdings. While our investment process includes ongoing review of companies in the investment
universes described below, our actual investments may include companies outside of the relevant market
capitalization range at the time of our investment. In addition, the number of holdings typically found in the
portfolios of each of our investment strategies may vary, as described below.
The following tables describe the allocation of our AUM among our investment strategies and the domicile of
our accounts, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Strategy
U.S. Value Strategies
Large Cap Value
Mid Cap Value
Value
Small Cap Value
Other U.S. Strategies
Total U.S. Value Strategies
Global and Non-U.S. Value Strategies
Global Value
International Value
Emerging Markets Value
European Value
Other Global and Non-U.S. Strategies
Total Global and Non-U.S. Value Strategies
Total
Account Domicile
U.S.
Non-U.S.
Total
AUM at December 31,
2017
2018
(in billions)
9.0 $
2.3
1.8
1.2
0.2
14.5
6.0
5.7
4.0
2.9
0.3
18.9
33.4 $
AUM at December 31,
2017
2018
(in billions)
22.6 $
10.8
33.4 $
11.2
2.8
2.2
1.6
0.1
17.9
6.7
6.3
4.3
3.2
0.1
20.6
38.5
25.6
12.9
38.5
$
$
$
$
32
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following table indicates the annualized returns, gross and net (which represents annualized returns prior to,
and after, payment of advisory fees, respectively), of our largest investment strategies from their inception to
December 31, 2018, and in the five-year, three-year, and one-year periods ended December 31, 2018, relative to the
performance of the market index which is often used by our clients to compare the performance of the relevant
investment strategy.
Investment Strategy (Inception Date)
Large Cap Value (July 2012)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell 1000® Value Index
International Value (November 2008)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI EAFE® Index – Net/U.S.$2
Emerging Markets Focused Value (January 2008)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI® Emerging Markets Index – Net/U.S.$2
Large Cap Focused Value (October 2000)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell 1000® Value Index
Global Value (January 2010)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI® World Index – Net/U.S.$2
European Focused Value (August 2008)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI® Europe Index – Net/U.S.$2
Global Focused Value (January 2004)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI® All Country World Index – Net/U.S.$2
Mid Cap Value (April 2014)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell Mid Cap® Value Index
Focused Value (January 1996)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell 1000® Value Index
Small Cap Focused Value (January 1996)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell 2000® Value Index
International Focused Value (January 2004)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
MSCI® All Country World ex-U.S. Index – Net/U.S.$2
Mid Cap Focused Value (September 1998)
Annualized Gross Returns
Annualized Net Returns
Russell Mid Cap® Value Index
Period Ended December 31, 20181
Since
Inception
5 Years
3 Years
1 Year
11.4%
11.3%
10.5%
9.0%
8.7%
6.2%
2.8%
1.9%
0.1%
6.5%
6.1%
6.2%
7.2%
6.9%
7.6%
4.0%
3.7%
1.3%
4.8%
4.1%
6.2%
3.7%
3.5%
4.6%
9.8%
9.0%
8.3%
12.8%
11.6%
9.0%
5.7%
4.9%
5.2%
11.5%
10.7%
9.5%
5.7%
5.5%
5.9%
0.6%
0.3%
0.5%
2.3%
1.5%
1.6%
5.1%
4.7%
5.9%
3.0%
2.6%
4.6%
(1.0)%
(1.3)%
(0.6)%
2.1%
1.5%
4.3%
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.2%
3.6%
5.9%
5.8%
4.8%
3.6%
0.9%
0.3%
0.7%
4.6%
4.0%
5.4%
7.2%
7.1%
7.0%
4.0%
3.7%
2.9%
13.7%
12.9%
9.2%
6.9%
6.5%
7.0%
5.7%
5.3%
6.3%
3.5%
3.1%
2.1%
5.5%
4.9%
6.6%
4.9%
4.6%
6.1%
5.2%
4.8%
7.0%
6.2%
5.2%
7.4%
5.4%
4.9%
4.5%
5.4%
4.7%
6.1%
(13.4)%
(13.6)%
(8.3)%
(15.4)%
(15.7)%
(13.8)%
(9.2)%
(9.9)%
(14.6)%
(16.2)%
(16.5)%
(8.3)%
(14.6)%
(15.0)%
(8.7)%
(20.3)%
(20.6)%
(14.9)%
(16.8)%
(17.2)%
(9.4)%
(20.2)%
(20.4)%
(12.3)%
(20.1)%
(20.4)%
(8.3)%
(13.1)%
(14.0)%
(12.9)%
(15.5)%
(15.9)%
(14.2)%
(20.9)%
(21.4)%
(12.3)%
33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
2
The historical returns of these investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of their future performance, or the future performance of
any of our other current or future investment strategies.
Net of applicable withholding taxes and presented in U.S.$.
Large Cap Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 50 to 80 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of 500 of the largest U.S. listed companies, based on market capitalization. This strategy was
launched in July 2012. At December 31, 2018, the Large Cap Value strategy generated a one-year annualized gross
return of (13.4)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sector was the financial services sector.
International Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 60 to 80 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 1,500 of the largest companies across the world excluding the United States, based on
market capitalization. This strategy was launched in November 2008. At December 31, 2018, the International
Value strategy generated a one-year annualized gross return of (15.4)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top
detracting sectors included the financial services and industrials sectors, partially offset by the performance of the
information technology sector.
Emerging Markets Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 80 stocks
drawn generally from a universe of 1,500 of the largest emerging market companies, based on market capitalization.
This strategy was launched in January 2008. At December 31, 2018, the Emerging Markets Focused Value strategy
generated a one-year annualized gross return of (9.2)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sector
was the financial services sector, partially offset by the performance of the consumer staples and communications
sectors.
Large Cap Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 40 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 500 of the largest U.S. listed companies, based on market capitalization. This strategy
was launched in October 2000. At December 31, 2018, the Large Cap Focused Value strategy generated a one-year
annualized gross return of (16.2)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the
financial services and healthcare sectors.
Global Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 60 to 95 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of 2,000 of the largest companies across the world, based on market capitalization. This strategy
was launched in January 2010. At December 31, 2018, the Global Value strategy generated a one-year annualized
gross return of (14.6)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the financial services,
energy and healthcare sectors.
European Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 50 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 750 of the largest European companies, based on market capitalization. This strategy
was launched in August 2008. At December 31, 2018, the European Focused Value strategy generated a one-year
annualized gross return of (20.3)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the
consumer staples, industrials, financial services and health care sectors, partially offset by the performance of the
information technology sector.
Global Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 60 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of 2,000 of the largest companies across the world, based on market capitalization. This
strategy was launched in January 2004. At December 31, 2018, the Global Focused Value strategy generated a one-
year annualized gross return of (16.8)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the
financial services and health care sectors, partially offset by the performance of certain Chinese stocks.
Mid Cap Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 50 to 80 stocks drawn generally
from a universe of U.S. listed companies ranked from the 201st to 1,200th largest, based on market capitalization.
This strategy was launched in April 2014. At December 31, 2018, the Mid Cap Value strategy generated a one-year
annualized gross return of (20.2)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the health
care, financial services, materials & processing, producer durables and utilities sectors.
34
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of a portfolio of approximately 30 to 40 stocks
drawn generally from a universe of 1,000 of the largest U.S. listed companies, based on market capitalization. This
strategy was launched in January 1996. At December 31, 2018, the Focused Value strategy generated a one-year
annualized gross return of (20.1)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the
financial services, health care, producer durables, materials & processing and consumer discretionary sectors.
Small Cap Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 40 to 50 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of U.S. listed companies ranked from the 1,001st to 3,000th largest, based on market
capitalization. This strategy was launched in January 1996. At December 31, 2018, the Small Cap Focused Value
strategy generated a one-year annualized gross return of (13.1)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top
detracting sectors included the technology, materials & processing and consumer discretionary sectors, partially
offset by the performance of the financial services, producer durables and energy sectors.
International Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 50 stocks
drawn generally from a universe of 1,500 of the largest companies across the world excluding the United States,
based on market capitalization. This strategy was launched in January 2004. At December 31, 2018, the
International Focused Value strategy generated a one-year annualized gross return of (15.5)%, underperforming its
benchmark. The top detracting sectors included the financial services and industrials sectors, partially offset by the
performance of the information technology sector.
Mid Cap Focused Value. This strategy reflects a portfolio composed of approximately 30 to 40 stocks drawn
generally from a universe of U.S. listed companies ranked from the 201st to 1,200th largest, based on market
capitalization. This strategy was launched in September 1998. At December 31, 2018, the Mid Cap Focused Value
strategy generated a one-year annualized gross return of (20.9)%, underperforming its benchmark. The top
detracting sectors included the health care, financial services, materials & processing, producer durables and utilities
sectors.
Our earnings and cash flows are heavily dependent upon prevailing financial market conditions. Significant
increases or decreases in the various securities markets, particularly the equities markets, can have a material impact
on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The change in AUM in our separately managed accounts, sub-advised accounts and Pzena funds for the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is described below. Inflows are composed of the investment of new or
additional assets by new or existing clients. Outflows consist of redemptions of assets by existing clients.
Assets Under Management1
Separately Managed Accounts
Assets
Beginning of Period
Inflows
Outflows
Net Flows
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation)
End of Period
Sub-Advised Accounts
Assets
Beginning of Period
Inflows
Outflows
Net Flows
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation)
End of Period
Pzena Funds
Assets
Beginning of Period Assets
Inflows
Outflows
Net Flows
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation)
End of Period
Total
Assets
Beginning of Period
Inflows
Outflows
Net Flows
Market Appreciation/(Depreciation)
End of Period
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in billions)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
15.0 $
1.6
(1.8)
(0.2)
(2.2)
12.6 $
21.8 $
3.0
(2.4)
0.6
(3.6)
18.8 $
1.7 $
0.9
(0.3)
0.6
(0.3)
2.0 $
38.5 $
5.5
(4.5)
1.0
(6.1)
33.4 $
12.5
1.4
(1.6)
(0.2)
2.7
15.0
16.3
3.5
(1.8)
1.7
3.8
21.8
1.2
0.5
(0.3)
0.2
0.3
1.7
30.0
5.4
(3.7)
1.7
6.8
38.5
During the year ended December 31, 2018, our AUM decreased $5.1 billion, or 13.2%, from $38.5 billion at
December 31, 2017. This decrease is primarily due to market depreciation, partially offset by net inflows during the
year ended December 31, 2018.
At December 31, 2018, we managed $12.6 billion in separately managed accounts, $18.8 billion in sub-advised
accounts, and $2.0 billion in Pzena funds, for a total of $33.4 billion in assets. For the year ended December 31,
2018, we experienced $6.1 billion in market depreciation and total gross outflows of $4.5 billion, which were
partially offset by total gross inflows of $5.5 billion. Assets in separately managed accounts decreased by $2.4
billion, or 16.0%, from $15.0 billion at December 31, 2017, due to $2.2 billion in market depreciation and $1.8
billion in gross outflows, partially offset by $1.6 billion in gross inflows. Assets in sub-advised accounts decreased
by $3.0 billion, or 13.8%, from $21.8 billion at December 31, 2017, due to $3.6 billion in market depreciation and
$2.4 billion in gross outflows, partially offset by $3.0 billion in gross inflows. Assets in Pzena funds increased by
36
TABLE OF CONTENTS
$0.3 billion, or 17.6%, from $1.7 billion at December 31, 2017 as a result of $0.9 billion in gross inflows, partially
offset by $0.3 billion in market depreciation and $0.3 billion in gross outflows.
At December 31, 2017, we managed $15.0 billion in separately managed accounts, $21.8 billion in sub-advised
accounts, and $1.7 billion in Pzena funds, for a total of $38.5 billion in assets. For the year ended December 31,
2017, we experienced $6.8 billion in market appreciation and total gross inflows of $5.4 billion, which were
partially offset by total gross outflows of $3.7 billion. Assets in separately managed accounts increased by $2.5
billion, or 20.0%, from $12.5 billion at December 31, 2016, due to $2.7 billion in market appreciation and $1.4
billion in gross inflows, partially offset by $1.6 billion in gross outflows. Assets in sub-advised accounts increased
by $5.5 billion, or 33.7%, from $16.3 billion at December 31, 2016, due to $3.8 billion in market appreciation and
$3.5 billion in gross inflows, partially offset by $1.8 billion in gross outflows. Assets in Pzena funds increased by
$0.5 billion, or 41.7%, from $1.2 billion at December 31, 2016 as a result of $0.5 billion in gross inflows and $0.3
billion in market appreciation, partially offset by $0.3 billion in gross outflows.
Revenue
Our revenue from advisory fees earned on our separately managed accounts, sub-advised accounts and Pzena
funds for the two years ended December 31, 2018 is described below:
Revenue
Separately Managed Accounts
Sub-Advised Accounts
Pzena Funds
Total
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
77,144 $
64,155
12,280
153,579 $
76,419
55,003
9,873
141,295
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Our total revenue increased $12.3 million, or 8.7%, to $153.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018
from $141.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This change was driven by an increase in average
assets during 2018, partially offset by a decrease in performance fees recognized during 2018. We recognized $2.9
million in performance fees during 2018, compared to $3.2 million in performance fees recognized in 2017. In
addition, for the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized a reduction of base fees in the amount of $0.2
million related to fulcrum fee arrangements. Average AUM increased 11.5% to $37.7 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2018 from $33.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Our weighted average fee rates were 0.408% and 0.418% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. Average assets in separately managed accounts increased 4.4% to $14.3 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2018, from $13.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, and had weighted average fees of
0.539% and 0.556% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease in the weighted
average fee rate for separately managed accounts is driven by an increase in assets in large client relationships which
generally carry lower fee rates, as well as a decrease in performance fees recognized during 2018. Average assets in
sub-advised accounts increased 15.1% to $21.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, from $18.6 billion for
the year ended December 31, 2017, and had weighted average fees of 0.299% and 0.295% for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Average assets in Pzena funds increased 26.7% to $1.9 billion for the
year ended December 31, 2018, from $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, and had weighted average
fees of 0.635% and 0.679% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company adopted
the new revenue recognition standard as of January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach, and thus prior
periods have not been restated. Excluding the impact of the revenue recognition presentation change, the weighted
average fee rate for Pzena funds was 0.680% for year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 0.679% for the year
ended December 31, 2017. This fluctuation in weighted average fee rate for Pzena funds was primarily driven by an
increase in assets in products that generally carry higher fee rates, partially offset by a decrease in performance fees
recognized in 2018.
37
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Expenses
Our operating expense is driven primarily by our compensation costs. The table below describes the
components of our operating expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Cash Compensation and Other Benefits
Other Non-Cash Compensation
Total Compensation and Benefits Expense
General and Administrative Expense
Total Operating Expenses
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
51,600 $
9,819
61,419
13,405
74,824 $
48,722
10,182
58,904
13,337
72,241
Total operating expenses increased by $2.6 million, or 3.6%, to $74.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2018, from $72.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Compensation and benefits expense increased by $2.5 million, or 4.3%, to $61.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2018, from $58.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase reflects an increase in
compensation rates, partially offset by the performance of deferred compensation investments made pursuant to our
Bonus Plan.
General and administrative expense increased by $0.1 million, or 0.5%, to $13.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2018, from $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Other (Expense)/ Income
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Other (expense)/ income was an expense of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, and consisted
primarily of $2.3 million in equity in the losses of affiliates, and $1.2 million in net realized and unrealized losses
from investments, partially offset by $1.0 million in interest and dividend income. Other (expense)/ income was
income of $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and consisted primarily of $20.8 million in income
related to adjustments to our liability to our selling and converting shareholders, $2.6 million in net realized and
unrealized gains from investments, $1.5 million in equity in the earnings of affiliates, and $0.6 million in interest
and dividend income. As discussed further below, the liability to our selling and converting shareholders represents
85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we realize as a result of
the amortization of the increases in tax basis generated from our purchase of operating company units from our
selling shareholders. The decrease in the liability to our selling and converting shareholders primarily resulted from
the re-measurement of the deferred tax asset upon enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the fourth quarter of
2017 described in income tax expense below.
38
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Income Tax Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, components of income tax expense are as follows:
Unincorporated and Other Business Tax Expenses
Corporate Tax Expense:
Corporate Income Tax Expense
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act1
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations2
Total Corporate Tax Expense
Total Income Tax Expense
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
2,778 $
2,862
$
4,667
—
333
5,000
7,778 $
6,188
26,468
(1,006)
31,650
34,512
$
1
2
Reflects income tax expense resulting from the re-measurement of the deferred tax asset related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in the
United States during the fourth quarter of 2017.
Reflects the net impact of a change in the calculation of historical 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2018 and the net impact of a change in the calculation of historical 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset and
corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Our results for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 include the effects of adjustments to our deferred
tax asset associated with our initial public offering and subsequent unit exchanges. Our results for the year ended
December 31, 2017 also include the effects of adjustments related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Details of
corporate tax expenses excluding these items and reconciliations between our GAAP and non-GAAP corporate tax
items are as follows:
Corporate Tax Expense
Less: Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Less: Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations
$
Non-GAAP Corporate Income Tax Expense
$
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
5,000 $
—
(333)
4,667 $
31,650
(26,468)
1,006
6,188
Our effective tax rate, exclusive of adjustments related to our tax receivable agreement and the associated
liability to selling and converting shareholders, was 24.8%, and 34.9% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, and was determined as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
% of Non-
GAAP
Pre-tax
Income
% of Non-
GAAP
Pre-tax
Income
Tax
(in
thousands)
21.0% $
3.1%
0.7%
24.8% $
6,031
479
(322)
6,188
34.0%
2.7%
(1.8)%
34.9%
Tax
(in
thousands)
$
$
3,947
579
141
4,667
Federal Corporate Tax
State and Local Taxes, Net of Federal Benefit
Prior Period and Other Adjustments
Non-GAAP Effective Taxes
A comparison of the GAAP effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is not
meaningful due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Income tax expense was $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $34.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2017. The 2017 income tax expense included $26.5 million of expense related to the re-
measurement of the deferred tax asset upon enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the United States during the
fourth quarter of 2017. Additionally, we identified an adjustment related to the historical calculation of the 754
step-ups in tax basis impacting the deferred tax assets and corresponding liability to selling and converting
shareholders during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The adjustment that was made during the year
ended December 31, 2018 resulted in a $0.3 million decrease to the deferred tax assets. The adjustment that was
made during the year ended December 31, 2017, resulted in a $4.6 million decrease to the deferred tax assets and a
$5.6 million decrease to the corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders. The cumulative impact of
the adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2017 is a net tax benefit of approximately $1.0 million which was
recognized as a component of income tax expense.
Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $54.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,
and consisted of $54.7 million associated with our employees' and outside investors' approximately 74.5% weighted-
average interest in the income of the operating company, and approximately $0.2 million associated with our
consolidated subsidiaries' interest in the losses of our consolidated subsidiaries. Net income attributable to non-
controlling interests was $53.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and consisted of $52.4 million
associated with our employees’ and outside investors’ approximately 74.7% weighted-average interest in the income
of the operating company, and approximately $0.9 million associated with our consolidated subsidiaries’ interest in
the income of our consolidated subsidiaries. The change in net income attributable to non-controlling interests
primarily reflects the increase in net income of the operating company for the year ended December 31, 2018,
partially offset by a decrease in our employees’ and outside investors’ weighted average interest in the income of the
operating company. We expect the interests in our operating company in subsequent periods to depend on changes
in our shareholder’s equity and the size and composition of Class B units awarded by our operating company’s
compensation plans.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, the working capital needs of our business have primarily been met through the cash generated by
our operations. Distributions to members of our operating company are our largest use of cash. Other activities
include purchases and sales of investments to fund our deferred compensation program, capital expenditures, and
strategic growth initiatives such as providing the seed investments in our mutual funds.
We expect to fund the liquidity needs of our business in the next twelve months, and over the long-term,
primarily through cash generated from operations. As an investment management company, our business is
materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions throughout the world.
Our liquidity is highly dependent on the revenue and income from our operations, which is directly related to our
levels of AUM. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our average AUM and revenues increased by 11.5% and
8.7%, respectively, compared to our average AUM and revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017. At
December 31, 2018, our cash was $38.1 million, inclusive of $6.2 million in cash held by our consolidated
subsidiaries. We also had $29.9 million in investments in trading debt securities and an open-ended mutual fund
that can be sold to meet future cash flow needs and approximately $9.8 million in investments set aside to satisfy our
obligations under our deferred compensation programs. Advisory fees receivable was $32.6 million.
In determining the sufficiency of liquidity and capital resources to fund our business, we regularly monitor our
liquidity position, including, among other things, cash, working capital, investments, long-term liabilities, lease
commitments, debt obligations, and operating company distributions. Compensation is our largest expense. To the
extent we deem necessary and appropriate to run our business, recognizing the need to retain our key personnel, we
have the ability to change the absolute levels of our compensation packages, as well as change the mix of their cash
and non-cash components. Historically, we have not tied our level of compensation directly to revenue, as many
Wall Street firms do. Correspondingly, there is not a linear relationship between our compensation and the revenues
40
TABLE OF CONTENTS
we generate. This generally has the effect of increasing operating margins in periods of increased revenues, but can
reduce operating margins when revenue declines.
We continuously evaluate our staffing requirements and compensation levels with reference to our own
liquidity position and external peer benchmarking data. The result of this review directly influences management’s
recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to such staffing and compensation levels.
We anticipate that tax allocations and dividend equivalent payments to the members of our operating company,
which consists of certain of our employees, unaffiliated persons, former employees, and us, will continue to be a
material financing activity. Cash distributions to operating company members for partnership tax allocations would
increase should the taxable income of the operating company increase. Dividend equivalent payments will depend
on our dividend policy and the discretion of our Board of Directors, as discussed below.
We believe that our lack of long-term debt, and ability to vary cash compensation levels, have provided us with
an appropriate degree of flexibility in providing for our liquidity needs.
Dividend Policy
As we are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of membership interests in
our operating company, we depend upon distributions from our operating company to pay any dividends that our
Board of Directors may declare to be paid to our Class A common stockholders. When, and if, our Board of
Directors declares any such dividends, we then cause our operating company to make distributions to us in an
amount sufficient to cover the dividends declared. Our dividend policy has certain risks and limitations, particularly
with respect to liquidity. We may not pay dividends to our Class A common shareholders in amounts that have been
paid to them in the past, or at all, if, among other things, we do not have the cash necessary to pay our intended
dividends. To the extent we do not have cash on hand sufficient to pay dividends in the future, we may decide not to
pay dividends. By paying cash dividends rather than investing that cash in our future growth, we risk slowing the
pace of our growth, or not having a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or unanticipated capital
expenditures, should the need arise.
On an annual basis, our Board of Directors has targeted a cash dividend payout ratio of approximately 60% to
70% of our non-GAAP diluted net income, subject to growth initiatives and other funding needs. However, our
Board of Directors may, in its discretion, modify the level of dividends, or discontinue the payment of dividends
entirely.
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to the Board of Directors’ discretion and may be limited by our holding
company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors — Risks Relating to
Our Class A Common Stock — Our ability to pay dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors
and may be limited by our holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law.”
41
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tax Receivable Agreement
Our purchase of membership units of our operating company concurrent with our IPO, and the subsequent and
future exchanges by holders of Class B units of our operating company for shares of our Class A common stock
(pursuant to the exchange rights provided for in the operating company’s operating agreement), has resulted in, and
is expected to continue to result in, increases in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of our
operating company, which will increase the tax depreciation and amortization deductions that otherwise would not
have been available to us. These increases in tax basis and tax depreciation and amortization deductions have
reduced, and are expected to continue to reduce, the amount of cash taxes that we would otherwise be required to
pay in the future. We have entered into a tax receivable agreement with the current members of our operating
company, the one member of our operating company immediately prior to our initial public offering who sold all of
its membership units to us in connection with our initial public offering, and any future holders of Class B units, that
requires us to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we
actually realize (or are deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by us, or a change in control, as
described in the tax receivable agreement) as a result of the increases in tax basis described above and certain other
tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments
under the tax receivable agreement.
Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash decreased $25.3 million to $39.1 million in 2018 compared to $64.4
million in 2017. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $18.6 million in 2018 to $87.6 million from
$69.0 million in 2017. The increase primarily reflects an increase in net income, changes in the levels of non-cash
compensation, equity in the losses of affiliates, net realized and unrealized losses from investments, as well as
changes in operating assets and liabilities and working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities was $33.4 million in 2018 compared to $0.5 million in cash provided by
investing activities in 2017. The $33.9 million increase in cash used was primarily due to a $31.7 million increase in
net purchases of investments and a $2.3 million increase in payments to related parties, partially offset by a $0.2
million decrease in purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities increased $31.5 million in 2018 to $79.5 million from $48.0 million in
2017. This increase is primarily due to a $26.8 million increase in net distributions from non-controlling interests, a
$7.0 million increase in the repurchase and retirement of shares of Class A common stock and Class B units during
2018, partially offset by a $5.0 million increase in cash provided by sales of shares under the equity incentive plan.
Contractual Obligations
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are
not required to provide the information under this item.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2018.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), requires management to make estimates and judgments
that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under current circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. We evaluate our
estimates on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
42
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Accounting policies are an integral part of our financial statements. A thorough understanding of these
accounting policies is essential when reviewing our reported results of operations and our financial condition.
Management believes that the critical accounting policies discussed below involve additional management judgment
due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used.
Consolidation
Our policy is to consolidate all majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest
and variable-interest entities of which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We assess our consolidation
practices regularly, as circumstances dictate. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
Income Taxes
We are a “C” corporation under the Internal Revenue Code, and thus liable for federal, state and local taxes on
the income derived from our economic interest in our operating company. The operating company is a limited
liability company that has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes. Our operating company has not
made a provision for federal or state income taxes because it is the responsibility of each of the operating company’s
members (including us) to separately report their proportionate share of the operating company’s taxable income or
loss. Similarly, the income of our consolidated investment partnerships is not subject to income taxes, as such
income is allocated to each partnership’s individual partners. The operating company has made a provision for New
York City Unincorporated Business Tax (UBT) and its consolidated subsidiary Pzena Investment Management,
LTD has made a provision for U.K. income taxes.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credits. A valuation allowance is recorded on our deferred tax assets when it is more-likely-
than-not that all or a portion of such assets will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax
assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated, which requires management to make significant
judgments and assumptions. Items considered when evaluating the need for a valuation allowance include our
forecast of future taxable income, future reversals of existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies and
other relevant considerations.
We believe that the accounting estimate related to the valuation allowance is a critical accounting estimate
because the underlying assumptions can change from period to period. For example, tax law changes, or variances
in future projected operating performance, could result in a change in the valuation allowance. Each quarter, we re-
evaluate our estimate related to the valuation allowance, including our assumptions about future taxable income. If
we are not able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be
recorded against our deferred tax asset and charged to income tax expense in the period such determination was
made.
Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, evaluating our tax positions
and establishing deferred tax assets and liabilities. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. If the ultimate resolution of uncertainties is different
from currently estimated, it could affect income tax expense and the effective tax rate.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet
Adopted" to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-9 of this Annual Report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as investment adviser for separate accounts we
manage, funds we offer, and accounts for which we act as sub-investment adviser.
43
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Our revenue for the two years ended December 31, 2018 was generally derived from advisory fees, which are
typically based on the market value of our AUM, which can be affected by adverse changes in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates and equity prices. Accordingly, a decline in the prices of securities would cause our revenue
and income to decline, due to a decrease in the value of the assets we manage. In addition, such a decline could
cause our clients to withdraw their funds in favor of investments offering higher returns or lower risk, which would
cause our revenue and income to decline further.
The value of our AUM was $33.4 billion as of December 31, 2018. A 10% increase or decrease in the value of
our AUM, if proportionately distributed over all of our investment strategies, products, and client relationships,
would cause an annualized increase or decrease in our revenues of approximately $13.5 million at our current
weighted average fee rate excluding the impact of performance fees and fulcrum fee arrangements of 0.405%. There
are differences in our fee rates across distribution channels, investment strategies and the size of client relationships.
As such, a change in the composition of our AUM, in particular an increase in the proportion of our total assets
under management attributable to strategies, clients or relationships with lower effective fee rates, could have a
material negative impact on our overall weighted average fee rates and thus different impact to revenues on the same
10% increase or decrease in the value of our AUM.
We are also subject to market risk due to a decline in the value of our holdings and the holdings of our
consolidated subsidiaries, which as of December 31, 2018 consist primarily of equity securities at fair value, trading
debt securities and investments in equity method investees. At December 31, 2018, the aggregate value of our assets
subject to market risk was $50.5 million. At December 31, 2018, none of our liabilities were subject to market risk.
Assuming a 10% increase or decrease, the fair value of these assets would increase or decrease by $5.0 million, at
December 31, 2018.
Exchange Rate Risk
A substantial portion of the accounts that we advise, or sub-advise, hold investments that are denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Movements in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the underlying
foreign currency affect the values of assets held in accounts that we manage, thereby affecting the amount of
revenues we earn. The value of our AUM was $33.4 billion as of December 31, 2018 and approximately 38% of our
assets under management across our investment strategies were invested in strategies that primarily invest in
securities of non-U.S. companies and approximately 45% of our assets under management were invested in
securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To the extent our assets under management are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the value of those assets under management will decrease with
an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar, or increase with a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar. Because we
believe that many of our clients invest in those strategies in order to gain exposure to non-U.S. currencies, or may
implement their own hedging programs, we do not hedge an investment portfolio’s exposure to a non-U.S. currency.
We have not adopted a corporate-level risk management policy to manage this exchange rate risk. Assuming
that 45% of our assets under management is invested in securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar and excluding the impact of any hedging arrangements, a 10% increase or decrease in the value of the U.S.
dollar would decrease or increase the fair value of our assets under management by $1.6 billion, which would cause
an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $6.6 million at our current weighted average fee
rate excluding the impact of performance fees and fulcrum fee arrangements of 0.405%.
We operate in several foreign countries, but mainly in the United Kingdom. We incur operating expenses and
have foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities associated with these operations, although our revenues are
predominately realized in U.S. dollar. We do not believe that foreign currency fluctuations materially affect our
results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2018, approximately $16.8 million of our total cash was primarily held in demand deposit
accounts and money market funds. As such, interest rate changes would not have a material impact on the income
we earn from these deposits. Our interest sensitive assets and liabilities included trading debt securities. At
December 31, 2018, the aggregate value of our assets subject to interest rate risk was $29.7 million. Assuming a
10% increase or decrease, the fair value of these assets would increase or decrease by $3.0 million, at December 31,
44
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2018. In addition, the Company does not have any debt, and as a result does not have any direct exposure to interest
rate risk at December 31, 2018.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto begin on page F-4 of this Annual Report and are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
During the course of their review of our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2018, our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective to ensure that
information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial
reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of
our financial statements for external purposes in accordance accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal controls, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal
controls can provide only reasonable assurances with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal controls may vary over time.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In making this
assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on the assessment using those criteria, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, our
internal control over financial reporting was effective.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial
statements included in this Annual Report have issued an audit report on our internal control over financial
reporting. This report appears on page F-2 of this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
45
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is set forth under the proposal “Election of Directors” and under the
subheading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" under the heading "Other Matters" in the
Company’s 2019 Proxy Statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within
120 days after December 31, 2018 in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2019 annual
meeting of shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference ("Company's 2019 Proxy Statement").
The Company has a code of ethics, “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,” that applies to all employees,
including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer and principal accounting officer,
as well as to the members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The code is available at www.pzena.com. The
Company intends to disclose any changes in, or waivers from, this code by posting such information on the same
website or by filing a Form 8-K, in each case to the extent such disclosure is required by rules of the SEC or the
New York Stock Exchange.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is set forth under the headings “Executive Compensation” and "2018
Non-Employee Director Compensation" in the Company’s 2019 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item is set forth under the headings “Security Ownership of Principal
Stockholders and Management,” and "Equity Compensation Plan Information," in the Company’s 2019 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is set forth under the heading “Related Party Transactions” and under the
subheading “Director Independence” under the proposal "Election of Directors” in the Company’s 2019 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is set forth under the proposal “Ratification of Independent Auditors” in
the Company’s 2019 Proxy Statement.
46
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:
PART IV
1. Financial Statements
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Page
F-2
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-9
There are no Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this Annual Report, since the required information is
included in our consolidated financial statements and in the notes thereto.
3. Exhibit List
We have incorporated by reference herein certain exhibits as specified below pursuant to Rule 12b-32 of the
Exchange Act. If specific material facts exist which contradict the representations and warranties contained in the
documents filed or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, corrective disclosure has been provided.
Additional information about us may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report, and our other public filings,
which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, as well as through our website
at www.pzena.com.
Exhibit
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
Description of Exhibit
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.,
effective as of May 23, 2017(1)
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Pzena Investment Management, Inc., effective as of January 15,
2016(2)
Form of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. Class A Common Stock Certificate(3)
Form of Exchange Rights of Class B Members(3)
Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. and the Holders named on the signature pages thereto(4)
Class B Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. and the Class B Stockholders named on the signature pages thereto(4)
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Pzena Investment Management, LLC, dated as of October
30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc. and the Class B Members named on the
signature pages thereto(4)
Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment Management,
Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and the Continuing Members and Exiting Members named on
the signature pages thereto(4)
Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan(5)
Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated Bonus Plan, as amended, dated as of October
21, 2008(6)
47
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Exhibit
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
Description of Exhibit
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, dated as of January 31,
2017(5)
Executive Employment Agreement for Richard S. Pzena, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among
Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and Richard S. Pzena(4)
Executive Employment Agreement for John P. Goetz, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and John P. Goetz(4)
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement for William L. Lipsey, dated as of October 30,
2007, by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and
William L. Lipsey(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Richard S. Pzena, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Richard S. Pzena(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Steven M. Galbraith, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Steven M. Galbraith(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Joel M. Greenblatt, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Joel M. Greenblatt(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Richard P. Meyerowich, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. and Richard P. Meyerowich(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Myron E. Ullman, III, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Myron E. Ullman, III(4)
Indemnification Agreement for Ronald W. Tysoe, dated as of December 11, 2008, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Ronald W. Tysoe(7)
Indemnification Agreement for John P. Goetz, dated as of May 17, 2011, by and among Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. and John P. Goetz(8)
Indemnification Agreement for William L. Lipsey, dated as of May 17, 2011, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and William L. Lipsey(8)
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of
July 21, 2009 (9)
Amendment, effective March 24, 2010, to Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Pzena
Investment Management, LLC, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. as the Managing Member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC and those Class B
members whose signatures are affixed thereto(10)
Amendment, dated as of March 5, 2012, to Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Pzena
Investment Management, LLC, dated as of October 30, 2007, by and among Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. as the Managing Member of Pzena Investment Management, LLC and those Class B
members whose signatures are affixed thereto(8)
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement for Richard S. Pzena, dated as of November 1, 2012,
by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC, and Richard S.
Pzena(11)
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement for John P. Goetz, dated as of November 1, 2012, by
and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC, and John P.
Goetz(11)
Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement for William L. Lipsey, dated as
of November 1, 2012, by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management,
LLC, and William L. Lipsey(11)
Amendment, dated as of November 12, 2012, to Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2007,
by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and the
Continuing Members and Exiting Members named on the signature pages thereto (12)
Indemnification Agreement for Charles D. Johnston, dated as of February 5, 2014, by and among Pzena
Investment Management, Inc. and Charles D. Johnston (13)
Lease, dated as of June 13, 2014, between Mutual of America Life Insurance Company, as Landlord and
Pzena Investment Management, LLC, as Tenant (14)
48
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Exhibit
10.26
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
14.1
14.2
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101
Description of Exhibit
Amendment No. 3 to Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated Operating Agreement,
dated November 1, 2014 (15)
Amendment to the Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated Bonus Plan, dated
December 2, 2014 (15)
Form of Unit-Based Award Agreement for Phantom Class B Units (15)
Form of Class B Unit Agreement - Delayed Exchange (15)
Form of Class B Unit-Based Agreement for Phantom Class B Units - Revised December, 2015 (16)
Form of Class B Unit Agreement - Delayed Exchange - Revised December, 2015 (16)
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pzena Investment Management, LP, dated as
of January 1, 2016(17)
Form of Class B Unit Option Agreement - Delayed Exchange (18)
Amendment, dated as of December 18, 2017, to Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2007,
as amended by and among Pzena Investment Management, Inc., Pzena Investment Management, LLC and
the Continuing Members and Exiting Members named on the signature pages thereto (18)
First Amendment of Lease dated November 8th, 2018 amending the Lease, dated as of June 13, 2014,
between Mutual of America Life Insurance Company, as Landlord and Pzena Investment Management,
LLC as Tenant (filed herewith)
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, effective as of October 25, 2007, amended as of February 2019
(filed herewith)
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers(19)
List of Subsidiaries of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. (filed herewith)
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
Materials from the Pzena Investment Management, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):
(i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and
(vi) related Unaudited Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in detail
(furnished herewith)
(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2017 (SEC
File No. 001-33761).
(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2016
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-143660) of Pzena Investment
Management, Inc., which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2007.
(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5,
2007 (SEC File No. 001-33761).
(5) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2017
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(6) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2008 (SEC File No. 001-33761).
(7) Previously filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(8) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(9) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9,
2009 (SEC File No. 001-33761).
(10) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2010
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(11) Previously filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2012
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(12) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(13) Previously filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2014
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(14) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2014
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(15) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2015
(SEC File No. 001-33761)
(16) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2016
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(17) Previously filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2016
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(18) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2018
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
(19) Previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008
(SEC File No. 001-33761).
ITEM 16. FORM OF 10-K SUMMARY
None.
50
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SIGNATURES
Dated: March 8, 2019
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
By: /s/ Richard S. Pzena
Name: Richard S. Pzena
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jessica R. Doran and Joan F. Berger, and
each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
to effectuate the intent and purpose of this paragraph, as fully as he or she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of Pzena Investment Management, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
TITLE
DATE
/s/ Richard S. Pzena
Richard S. Pzena
/s/ Jessica R. Doran
Jessica R. Doran
/s/ John P. Goetz
John P. Goetz
/s/ William L. Lipsey
William L. Lipsey
/s/ Steven M. Galbraith
Steven M. Galbraith
/s/ Joel M. Greenblatt
Joel M. Greenblatt
/s/ Richard P. Meyerowich
Richard P. Meyerowich
/s/ Charles D. Johnston
Charles D. Johnston
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
Co-Chief Investment Officer (principal executive officer)
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
President, Co-Chief Investment Officer, Director
President, Head of Business Development and
Client Service, Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
51
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
March 8, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ...............................................
F-2
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 .........................................................
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017...............................................
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 ..........................
F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017...................................
F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017..............................................
F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.........................................................................................................................
F-9
Page
F-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.,
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Pzena Investment
Management, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting
was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 8, 2019
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
F-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(in thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents ($3,733 and $3,717)1
Restricted Cash
Due from Broker ($16 and $1,485)1
Advisory Fees Receivable
Investments ($3,295 and $3,927)1
Receivable from Related Parties
Other Receivables ($13 and $15)1
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Deferred Tax Assets
Property and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation of $3,724 and
$3,063, respectively
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses ($15 and $14)1
Due to Broker ($4 and $0)1
Liability to Selling and Converting Shareholders
Deferred Compensation Liability
Other Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 12)
Equity:
Preferred Stock (Par Value $0.01; 200,000,000
Shares Authorized; None Outstanding)
Class A Common Stock (Par Value $0.01; 750,000,000
Shares Authorized; 18,398,211 and 18,096,554 Shares
Issued and Outstanding in 2018 and 2017, respectively)
Class B Common Stock (Par Value $0.000001; 750,000,000
Shares Authorized; 51,253,526 and 50,709,673 Shares Issued
and Outstanding in 2018 and 2017 respectively)
Additional Paid-In Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Total Pzena Investment Management, Inc.'s Equity
Non-Controlling Interests
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
As of
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
$
$
$
$
38,099 $
1,028
64
32,590
50,470
4,239
474
1,386
37,232
63,414
1,017
1,875
32,531
21,737
1,453
132
990
39,639
5,394
170,976 $
6,259
169,047
37,266 $
360
32,389
1,845
108
71,968
31,983
144
36,441
918
272
69,758
—
—
183
180
—
3,913
28,871
35
33,002
66,006
99,008
170,976 $
—
7,915
24,214
(5)
32,304
66,985
99,289
169,047
1
Asset and liability amounts in parentheses represent the aggregated balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017 attributable to Pzena
International Value Service (a series of Pzena Investment Management, LLC), Pzena Investment Management Special Situations, LLC, and
Pzena U.S. Best Ideas (GP), LLC, which were variable interest entities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Aggregated
balances of variable interest entities at December 31, 2018 also reflect Pzena Global Best Ideas (GP), LLC.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
REVENUE
EXPENSES
Compensation and Benefits Expenses
General and Administrative Expenses
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating Income
OTHER (EXPENSE)/ INCOME
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Dividend Income
Net Realized and Unrealized (Losses)/ Gains from Investments
Equity in the (Losses)/ Earnings of Affiliates
Change in Liability to Selling and Converting Shareholders
Other (Expense)/ Income
Total Other (Expense)/ Income
Income Before Income Taxes
Income Tax Expense
Net Income
Less: Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Net Income for Basic Earnings per Share
Basic Earnings per Share
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Net Income for Diluted Earnings per Share
Diluted Earnings per Share1
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding2
Cash Dividends per Share of Class A Common Stock
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
153,579 $
141,295
61,419
13,405
74,824
78,755
764
(77)
154
(1,183)
(2,347)
48
(17)
(2,658)
76,097
7,778
68,319
54,525
13,794 $
58,904
13,337
72,241
69,054
213
(29)
368
2,600
1,517
20,819
120
25,608
94,662
34,512
60,150
53,242
6,908
13,794 $
0.78 $
17,678,874
6,908
0.40
17,338,348
55,347 $
0.77 $
71,934,144
40,064
0.40
70,934,362
0.51 $
0.37
$
$
$
$
$
$
1
2
During the year ended ended December 31, 2017, the calculation of diluted earnings per share resulted in an increase in earnings per share.
Therefore, diluted earnings per share is assumed to be equal to basic earnings per share. Please refer to Note 5, "Earnings per Share," for
further details.
The Company issues restricted share of Class A common stock and restricted Class B units that have non-forfeitable dividend rights. Under
the “two-class method,” these shares and units are considered participating securities and are required to be included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
NET INCOME
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)/ INCOME
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
Total Other Comprehensive (Loss)/ Income
Comprehensive Income
Less: Comprehensive Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Pzena Investment Management,
Inc.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
68,319 $
60,150
(152)
(152)
68,167
54,333
$
13,834
$
122
122
60,272
53,344
6,928
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Balance at December 31, 2016
Adjustment for the Cumulative Effect of Applying ASU
2016-09
Adjusted Balance at January 1, 2017
Unit Conversion
Amortization of Non-Cash Compensation
Issuance of Shares under Equity Incentive Plan
Sale of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan
Directors' Shares
Net Income
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Options Exercised
Repurchase and Retirement of Class A Common Stock
Repurchase and Retirement of Class B Units
Contributions from Non-Controlling Interests
Distributions to Non-Controlling Interests
Class A Cash Dividends Declared and Paid ($0.37 per
share)
Effect of Deconsolidation
Other
Balance at December 31, 2017
Unit Conversion
Amortization of Non-Cash Compensation
Issuance of Shares under Equity Incentive Plan
Sale of Shares Under Equity Incentive Plan
Directors' Shares
Net Income
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Options Exercised
Repurchase and Retirement of Class A Common Stock
Repurchase and Retirement of Class B Units
Contributions from Non-Controlling Interests
Distributions to Non-Controlling Interests
Class A Cash Dividends Declared and Paid ($0.51 per
share)
Tax Impact of Transactions with Non-Controlling
Shareholders
Other
Balance at December 31, 2018
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
Shares of Class A
Common Stock
Shares of Class B
Common Stock
Class A
Common Stock
Additional Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income/
(Loss)
Retained Earnings
Non-Controlling
Interests
Total
17,340,090
—
17,340,090
855,535
34,934
—
—
—
—
—
16,722
(150,727)
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,096,554
1,141,663
20,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
(860,006)
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,398,211
50,461,598
$
173
$
5,996
$
(25)
$
22,349
$
52,841
$
—
50,461,598
(855,535)
443,198
620,543
31,803
—
—
—
41,781
—
(33,715)
—
—
—
—
—
50,709,673
(1,141,663)
505,134
300,931
897,813
—
—
—
29,698
—
(48,060)
—
—
—
$
—
—
51,253,526
$
—
173
9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
180
11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(8)
—
—
—
—
—
—
183
$
$
—
5,996
1,600
1,070
1,118
51
121
—
—
—
(1,488)
(96)
—
—
—
—
(457)
7,915
2,498
1,479
1,096
1,343
141
—
—
—
(8,586)
(74)
—
—
—
(245)
(1,654)
3,913
$
$
—
(25)
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(5)
—
—
—
—
—
—
40
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
$
$
1,377
23,726
—
—
—
—
—
6,908
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6,420)
—
—
24,214
—
—
—
—
—
13,794
—
—
—
—
—
—
(9,137)
—
—
28,871
$
$
—
52,841
(1,059)
3,092
3,295
153
360
53,242
102
—
—
(278)
4,166
(44,095)
—
(5,291)
457
66,985
(1,634)
4,240
3,095
3,850
410
54,525
(192)
—
—
(217)
272
(66,982)
—
—
1,654
66,006
$
$
81,334
1,377
82,711
550
4,162
4,413
204
481
60,150
122
—
(1,490)
(374)
4,166
(44,095)
(6,420)
(5,291)
—
99,289
875
5,719
4,191
5,193
551
68,319
(152)
—
(8,594)
(291)
272
(66,982)
(9,137)
(245)
—
99,008
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PZENA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
68,319 $
60,150
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating
Activities:
Depreciation
Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets
Non-Cash Compensation
Directors' Share Grants
Net Realized and Unrealized Losses/ (Gains) from Investments
Equity in the Losses/ (Earnings) of Affiliates
Accretion of Discount
Non-Cash Performance Fees
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
Change in Liability to Selling and Converting Shareholders
Deferred Income Taxes
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Advisory Fees Receivable
Due from Broker
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Due to Broker
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses, and Other Liabilities
Tax Receivable Agreement Payments
Purchases of Investments
Proceeds from Sale of Investments
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of Investments
Proceeds from Sale of Investments
Payments to Related Parties
Purchase of Property and Equipment
Net Cash (Used in)/ Provided by Investing Activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repurchase and Retirement of Class A Common Stock
Repurchase and Retirement of Class B Units
Sale of Shares under Equity Incentive Plan
Distributions to Non-Controlling Interests
Contributions from Non-Controlling Interests
Dividends
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of Year
Effect of Deconsolidation of Affiliates
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — End of Year
Supplementary Cash Flow Information:
Unit Conversion
Issuance of Shares under Equity Incentive Plan
Income Taxes Paid
$
$
$
$
$
$
995
36
9,819
551
1,183
2,347
(90)
—
(152)
(48)
4,620
(59)
1,878
(738)
216
6,430
(5,880)
(23,853)
22,025
87,599
(41,603)
11,191
(2,786)
(166)
(33,364)
(8,594)
(291)
5,193
(66,982)
272
(9,137)
(79,539)
(25,304) $
64,431 $
—
(25,304)
39,127 $
875 $
4,191 $
500 $
1,024
6
10,182
481
(2,600)
(1,517)
—
(237)
122
(26,427)
37,269
(6,205)
(1,026)
(60)
127
2,566
(4,155)
(41,077)
40,329
68,952
(869)
2,180
(445)
(324)
542
(1,490)
(374)
204
(44,095)
4,166
(6,420)
(48,009)
21,485
47,158
(4,212)
21,485
64,431
550
4,413
797
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 — Organization
Pzena Investment Management, Inc. (the “Company”) functions as the sole managing member of its operating
company, Pzena Investment Management, LLC (the “operating company”). As a result, the Company: (i)
consolidates the financial results of the operating company and reflects the membership interests that it does not own
as a non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements; and (ii) recognizes income generated from its
economic interest in the operating company’s net income.
The operating company is an investment adviser which is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
and is headquartered in New York, New York. As of December 31, 2018, the operating company managed assets in
a variety of value-oriented investment strategies across a wide range of market capitalizations in both U.S. and non-
U.S. capital markets.
The Company also serves as the general partner of Pzena Investment Management, LP, a partnership formed
with the objective of aggregating employee ownership in the operating company into one entity.
The Company has consolidated the results of operations and financial condition of the following entities as of
December 31, 2018:
Legal Entity
Pzena Investment Management, Pty
Pzena Financial Services, LLC
Pzena Investment Management, LTD
Pzena U.S. Best Ideas (GP), LLC
Pzena Global Best Ideas (GP), LLC
Pzena Investment Management Special
Situations, LLC
Pzena International Small Cap Value Fund, a
series of Advisors Series Trust
Pzena International Value Service, a series of the
Pzena Investment Management International,
LLC
Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation:
Ownership at
December 31,
2018
Type of Entity (Date of Formation)
Australian Proprietary Limited Company
(12/16/2009)
Delaware Limited Liability Company
(10/15/2013)
England and Wales Private Limited Company
(1/08/2015)
Delaware Limited Liability Company
(11/16/2017)
Delaware Limited Liability Company
(2/15/2018)
Delaware Limited Liability Company
(12/01/2010)
Open-end Management Investment Company,
series of Delaware Statutory Trust (6/28/2018)
Delaware Limited Liability Company
(12/22/2003)
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
99.9%
97.1%
50.8%
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and related Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and
regulations.
Principles of Consolidation:
The Company’s policy is to consolidate those entities in which it has a direct or indirect controlling financial
interest based on either the voting interest model or the variable interest model. As such, the Company consolidates
majority-owned subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest, and certain investment vehicles the
operating company sponsors for which it is the investment adviser that are considered to be variable-interest entities
(“VIEs”), and for which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
F-9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Pursuant to the Consolidation Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("FASB ASC"), for legal
entities evaluated for consolidation, the Company determines whether interests it holds and fees paid to it qualify as
a variable interest. If it is determined that the Company does not have a variable interest in the entity, no further
analysis is required, and the Company does not consolidate the entity. If it is determined that the Company has a
variable interest, it considers its direct economic interests and the proportionate indirect interests through related
parties to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
For equity investments where the Company does not control the investee, and where it is not the primary
beneficiary of a VIE but can exert significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the investee, the
Company follows the equity method of accounting. The evaluation of whether the Company exerts control or
significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the investee requires significant judgment based on
the facts and circumstances surrounding each investment. Factors considered in these evaluations may include the
type of investment, the legal structure of the investee, the terms of the investment agreement, or other agreements
with the investee.
The Company analyzes entities structured as series funds which comply with the requirements included in the
Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered mutual funds as voting interest entities because the shareholders are
deemed to have the ability to direct the activities of the fund that most significantly impact the fund's economic
performance.
Consolidated Entities
The Company consolidates the financial results of the operating company and records in its own equity its pro-
rata share of transactions that impact the operating company’s net equity, including unit and option issuances,
repurchases, and retirements. The operating company’s pro-rata share of such transactions are recorded as an
adjustment to additional paid-in capital or non-controlling interests, as applicable, on the consolidated statements of
financial condition.
The majority-owned subsidiaries in which the Company, through its interest in the operating company, has a
controlling financial interest and the VIEs for which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary are
collectively referred to as “consolidated subsidiaries.” Non-controlling interests recorded on the consolidated
financial statements of the Company include the non-controlling interests of the outside investors in each of these
entities, as well as those of the operating company. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have
been eliminated through consolidation.
During 2014, the Company provided the initial cash investment for three Pzena mutual funds in an effort to
generate an investment performance track record to attract third-party investors. During 2016, the Company
provided the initial cash investment for the launch of a fourth Pzena mutual fund: the Pzena Small Cap Value Fund.
During 2018, the Company provided the initial cash investment for the launch of a fifth Pzena mutual fund: the
Pzena International Small Cap Value Fund. Due to their series fund structure, registration, and compliance with the
requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, these funds are analyzed for consolidation under the voting
interest model. As a result of the Company's initial interests, it consolidated the Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund, Pzena
Long/Short Value Fund, Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund, Pzena Small Cap Value Fund, and Pzena
International Small Cap Value Fund. On July 11, 2016, due to additional subscriptions into the Pzena Small Cap
Value Fund, the Company's ownership decreased to 36.1%. On November 9, 2017 and December 21, 2017 due to
additional subscriptions into the Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund and Pzena Long/Short Value Fund, respectively, the
Company's ownership decreased to 41.7% and 35.5%, respectively. As the Company was no longer deemed to
control the funds, it deconsolidated the entities, removed the related assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest
from its balance sheet and classified the Company's remaining investments as equity method investments. In
addition, as of December 31, 2018, the Company withdrew its initial cash investment in Pzena Emerging Markets
Value Fund and removed the equity method investment from its balance sheet.
The operating company is the managing member of Pzena International Value Service, a series of Pzena
Investment Management International, LLC. The operating company is considered the primary beneficiary of this
entity. At December 31, 2018, Pzena International Value Service’s $3.0 million in net assets were included in the
Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition.
F-10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
These consolidated investment partnerships are investment companies and apply specialized industry
accounting for investment companies. The Company has retained this specialized accounting for these investment
partnerships pursuant to U.S. GAAP.
Non-Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
VIEs that are not consolidated continue to receive investment management services from the operating
company and are generally private investment partnerships sponsored by the operating company. The total net
assets of these VIEs was approximately $205.4 million and $165.5 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, in order to satisfy certain of the Company's obligations
under its deferred compensation programs, the operating company had $2.4 million and $3.0 million in investments,
respectively, in certain of these firm-sponsored vehicles, for which the Company was not deemed to be the primary
beneficiary. The Company's exposure to risk in the non-consolidated VIEs is generally limited to any equity
investment and any uncollected management fees. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the
Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the non-consolidated VIEs was $2.7
million and $3.2 million, respectively.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2018:
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." The
core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or
services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for the goods or services. The Company completed its overall assessment of its revenue streams and
review of related contracts potentially affected by the new standard, including base management fees, performance
fees, and fulcrum fee arrangements. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that ASU No. 2014-09 did
not change the method in which the Company currently recognizes revenue. The Company also completed its
evaluation of certain costs related to revenue streams to determine whether such costs should be presented as
expenses or contra-revenue. Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that the classification of fund expense
cap reimbursements should change upon adoption. The Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018
using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the new standard requires the Company to present fund
expense cap reimbursements net against Revenue. Prior to adoption, these expense cap reimbursements were
presented as a component of General and Administrative Expense. These classification changes resulted in
immaterial changes to both revenue and expense. In accordance with the historic method of accounting under ASC
Topic 605, Revenue and General and Administrative Expenses would have been higher by $0.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018. As the implementation of the new standard did not impact the measurement or
recognition of revenue, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary.
Consistent with the modified retrospective approach, the Company did not adjust prior period amounts for the fund
expense cap reimbursement reclassifications noted above. The Company has included additional disclosures
associated with the disaggregation of revenue and performance obligations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)." This update
provides specific guidance on cash flow classification issues, which is intended to reduce the diversity in practice in
how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The
Company adopted ASU No. 2016-15 as of January 1, 2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted
Cash." This update requires entities to show the changes in the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and
restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-18 as of January 1,
2018 using a retrospective approach. Upon adoption, the net change in cash presented in the consolidated statement
of cash flows will reflect the total of cash and restricted cash.
Management’s Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period.
Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
F-11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Revenue Recognition:
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Revenue, comprised of advisory fee income, is recognized over the period in which advisory services are
provided. Advisory fee income includes management fees that are calculated based on percentages of assets under
management (“AUM”), generally billed quarterly, either in arrears or advance, depending on their contractual terms.
Advisory fee income also includes performance fees that may be earned by the Company depending on the
investment return of AUM, as well as fulcrum fee arrangements. Performance fee arrangements generally entitle the
Company to participate, on a fixed-percentage basis, in any returns generated in excess of an agreed-upon
benchmark. The Company’s participation percentage in such return differentials is then multiplied by AUM to
determine the performance fees earned. In general, returns are calculated on an annualized basis over the contract’s
measurement period, which usually extends to three years. Performance fees are generally payable annually or
quarterly. Fulcrum fee arrangements require a reduction in the base fee, or allow for a performance fee if the
relevant investment strategy underperforms or outperforms, respectively, the agreed-upon benchmark over the
contract's measurement period, which extends to three years. Fulcrum fees are generally payable quarterly.
Following the preferred method identified in the Revenue Recognition Topic of the FASB ASC, performance fee
income is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period, when it is probable that significant
reversal of the performance fee will not occur. Upon adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018, advisory
fee income also includes fund expense cap reimbursements which are required to be presented net against Revenue
rather than as a component of General and Administrative Expense.
Revenue from advisory fees is disaggregated into categories based on the composition of the Company's client
base and advisory fee structure for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017:
Revenue
Separately Managed Accounts
Asset-Based Fees
Performance-Based Fees
Total Separately Managed Fees
Sub-Advised Accounts
Asset-Based Fees
Decrease in Asset-Based Fees
Performance-Based Fees
Total Sub-Advised Fees
Pzena Funds
Asset-Based Fees
Expense Cap Reimbursements
Performance-Based Fees
Total Pzena Funds Fees
Total
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
$
$
77,144 $
—
77,144
61,475 $
(187)
2,867
64,155
13,136 $
(868)
12
12,280
153,579 $
75,545
874
76,419
52,952
—
2,051
55,003
9,638
—
235
9,873
141,295
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Cash and Cash Equivalents was $38.1 million and $63.4 million, respectively.
The Company considers all money market funds and highly-liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of
three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank
deposits, other accounts whose balances often exceed federally insured limits and treasury money market funds.
Cash is stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Interest on cash and cash equivalents is recorded as Interest Income on an accrual basis in the consolidated
statements of operations.
F-12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Restricted Cash:
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
At both December 31, 2018, and 2017, the Company had $1.0 million of compensating balances recorded in
Restricted Cash in the consolidated statements of financial condition. These balances reflect a letter of credit issued
by a third party in lieu of a cash security deposit, as required by the Company’s lease for its corporate headquarters.
The following table reconciles cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash per the consolidated statements of
cash flows to the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted Cash
Total
Due to/from Broker:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
2016
$
$
38,099 $
1,028
39,127 $
63,414 $
1,017
64,431 $
43,522
3,636
47,158
Due to/from Broker consists primarily of amounts payable/receivable for unsettled securities transactions
held/initiated at the clearing brokers of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Non-Cash Compensation:
All non-cash compensation awards granted have varying vesting schedules and are issued at prices equal to the
assessed fair market value at the time of issuance. Expenses associated with these awards are recognized over the
period during which employees are required to provide service. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
Investments:
Investments, at Fair Value
Investments, at Fair Value consist of equity securities at fair value and trading debt securities held by the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, as well as investments in open-ended registered mutual funds.
Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates
such determination on an ongoing basis. Dividends and interest income associated with the Company's investments
and the investments of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries are recognized as Dividend Income on an ex-
dividend basis and Interest Income, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations.
All such investments are recorded at fair value, with net realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized as
a component of Net Realized and Unrealized (Losses)/ Gains from Investments in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Investments in equity method investees
The Company accounts for its investments in certain private investment partnerships in which the Company has
non-controlling interests and exercises significant influence, using the equity method. These investments are
included in Investments in the Company's consolidated statements of financial condition. The carrying value of
these investments are recorded at the amount of capital reported by the private investment partnership or mutual
fund. The capital account reflects any contributions paid to, distributions received from, and equity earnings of, the
entities. The earnings of these investments are recognized in Equity in (Losses)/ Earnings of Affiliates in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in equity method investees are evaluated for impairment as events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying amounts of the assets
exceed their respective fair values, additional impairment tests are performed to measure the amounts of impairment
losses, if any. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses were recognized.
F-13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Securities Valuation:
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Investments in equity securities for which market quotations are available are valued at the last reported price or
closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. If no reported equity sales occurred on the
valuation date, equity investments are valued at the bid price. Investments in registered mutual funds are carried at
fair value at their respective net asset values as of the valuation date. Otherwise, fair values for investment securities
are based on Level 2 or Level 3 inputs detailed in Note 9. Transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
The net realized gain or loss on sales of securities is determined on a specific identification basis and is included
in Net Realized and Unrealized (Losses)/ Gains from Investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
Concentrations of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
cash, amounts due from brokers, and advisory fees receivable. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits
and other accounts whose balances often exceed federally insured limits.
The concentration of credit risk with respect to advisory fees receivable is generally limited due to the short
payment terms extended to clients by the Company. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its advisory fees
receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, if necessary, based on a history of past write-offs,
collections, and current credit conditions. For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, approximately 11.4%
and 11.3%, respectively, of the Company's advisory fees were generated from advisory agreements with one client
relationship. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, no allowance for doubtful accounts has been deemed necessary.
Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is
provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from three to
seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the
improvements or the remaining lease term.
Business Segments:
The Company views its operations as comprising one operating segment.
Income Taxes:
The Company is a “C” corporation under the Internal Revenue Code, and is thus liable for federal, state, and
local taxes on the income derived from its economic interest in its operating company. The operating company is a
limited liability company that has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes. It has not made a provision
for federal or state income taxes because it is the individual responsibility of each of the operating company’s
members (including the Company) to separately report their proportionate share of the operating company’s taxable
income or loss. The operating company has made a provision for New York City Unincorporated Business Tax
(“UBT”) and its consolidated subsidiary Pzena Investment Management, LTD has made a provision for U.K.
income taxes.
Judgment is required in evaluating the Company's uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for
income taxes. The Company establishes reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the
extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These liabilities are established when the Company believes that
certain positions might be challenged despite its belief that its tax return positions are in accordance with applicable
tax laws. The Company adjusts these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a
tax audit, new tax legislation, or the change of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters
is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in
which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and
changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. It is also the Company’s policy to recognize accrued interest,
and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in Income Tax Expense on the consolidated statements of
operations.
F-14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries account for all U.S. federal, state, local and U.K. taxation
pursuant to the asset and liability method, which requires deferred income tax assets and liabilities to be recorded for
temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable
or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the
temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income.
The Company’s purchase of membership units of the operating company concurrent with the initial public
offering, and the subsequent and future exchanges by holders of Class B units of the operating company for shares
of Class A common stock (pursuant to the exchange rights provided for in the operating company’s operating
agreement), has resulted in, and is expected to continue to result in, increases in the Company’s share of the tax
basis of the tangible and intangible assets of the operating company, which will increase the tax depreciation and
amortization deductions that otherwise would not have been available to the Company. These increases in tax basis
and tax depreciation and amortization deductions have reduced, and are expected to continue to reduce, the amount
of cash taxes that the Company would otherwise be required to pay in the future. The Company has entered into a
tax receivable agreement with past, current, and future members of the operating company that requires the
Company to pay to any member involved in any exchange transaction 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any,
in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or foreign or franchise tax that it realizes as a result of these increases in
tax basis and, in limited cases, transfers or prior increases in tax basis. The Company expects to benefit from the
remaining 15% of cash tax savings, if any, in income tax it realizes. Payments under the tax receivable agreement
will be based on the tax reporting positions that the Company will determine. The Company will not be reimbursed
for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement if a tax basis increase is successfully
challenged by the Internal Revenue Service.
The Company records an increase in deferred tax assets for the estimated income tax effects of the increases in
tax basis based on enacted federal and state tax rates at the date of the exchange. The Company records 85% of the
estimated realizable tax benefit (which is the recorded deferred tax asset less any recorded valuation allowance) as
an increase to the liability due under the tax receivable agreement, which is reflected as the liability to selling and
converting shareholders in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The remaining 15% of the estimated
realizable tax benefit is initially recorded as an increase to the Company’s additional paid-in capital. All of the
effects to the deferred tax asset of changes in any of the estimates after the tax year of the exchange will be reflected
in the provision for income taxes. Similarly, the effect of subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be
reflected in the provision for income taxes.
Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more-
likely-than-not to be realized. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not have a valuation allowance
recorded against its deferred tax assets.
The income tax expense, or benefit, is the tax payable or refundable for the period, plus or minus the change
during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company records its deferred tax liabilities as a
component of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Upon adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017, all excess tax benefits or tax deficiencies related to
stock- and unit-transactions are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of the
provision for income taxes. Previously, these excess tax benefits were not recognized until they resulted in a
reduction of cash taxes payable, and were subsequently recorded in equity when they reduced cash taxes payable.
The Company only recognized a tax benefit from stock- and unit-based awards in Additional Paid-In Capital if an
incremental tax benefit was realized after all other tax benefits available had been utilized. The adoption of ASU No.
2016-09 resulted in a net cumulative effect adjustment reflecting a $1.4 million increase to retained earnings and the
deferred tax asset as of January 1, 2017, related to the recognition of the previously unrecognized excess tax benefits
using the modified retrospective method.
Foreign Currency:
The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations whose
functional currency is not the U.S. Dollar are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the applicable reporting
date, and the consolidated statements of operations are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the
applicable period. A charge or credit is recorded to other comprehensive (loss)/ income to reflect the translation of
F-15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
these amounts to the extent the non-U.S. currency is designated the functional currency of the subsidiary. Non-
functional currency related transaction gains and losses are immediately recorded in the consolidated statements of
operations. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $0.2 million of other comprehensive loss
associated with foreign currency translation adjustments. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company
recorded approximately $0.1 million of other comprehensive income associated with foreign currency translation
adjustments.
Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured into U.S.
Dollar amounts at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities, and income and expense items
denominated in foreign currencies, are remeasured into U.S. Dollar amounts on the respective dates of such
transactions.
The Company does not isolate the portion of the results of its operations resulting from the impact of
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its non-U.S. investments. Such fluctuations are included in Net Realized
and Unrealized (Losses)/ Gains from Investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
Reported net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or
losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the
amounts of dividends, interest, foreign withholding taxes, and other receivables and payables recorded on the
Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition and the U.S. Dollar equivalent of the amounts actually
received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair values of assets
and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted:
In September 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Internal-Use
Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” This new guidance requires a customer in a cloud computing arrangement
that is a service contract to follow the internal-use software guidance in ASC 350-40 to determine which
implementation costs to capitalize as assets or expense as incurred. The guidance is effective for the fiscal years and
interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of this standard, however, does not expect the standard to have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)." This
new guidance requires the use of an “expected loss” model, rather than an “incurred loss” model, for financial
instruments measured at amortized cost and also requires companies to record allowances for available-for-sale debt
securities rather than reduce the carrying amount. The guidance is effective for the fiscal years and interim periods
within those years beginning after December 15, 2019. The guidance should be applied using a retrospective
approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this standard, however, does not expect the standard to
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." This amended standard was
written to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease
liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard
requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months.
Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as a finance or operating lease.
The amendments also require certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The new guidance, along with the
amendments, is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt the new
standard as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective transition approach. The adoption is expected to
result in an approximately $15 million increase in total assets and liabilities during the first quarter of 2019. The
adoption of the new standard is not expected to affect the Company's consolidated statements of operations and cash
flows. The Company’s future financial statements will include additional disclosures as required by ASU 2016-02.
F-16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 3 — Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses to employees and members is comprised of the following:
Cash Compensation and Other Benefits
Non-Cash Compensation
Total Compensation and Benefits Expense
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
51,600 $
9,819
61,419 $
48,722
10,182
58,904
All non-cash compensation awards granted have varying vesting schedules and are issued at prices equal to the
assessed fair market value at the time of issuance, as discussed below. Details of awards of Class B units of the
operating company, Delayed Exchange Class B units, phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units, phantom Class B
units of the operating company, options to purchase Class A common stock or Class B units, options to purchase
Delayed Exchange Class B units, and shares of Class A common stock awarded for the two years ended
December 31, 2018 are as follows:
Restricted Class B Units
Delayed Exchange Class B Units2
Deferred Compensation Phantom Delayed Exchange
Class B Units3
Options to Purchase Delayed Exchange Class B
Units4
Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B Units5
Phantom Class B Units6
Options to Purchase Shares of Class A Common
Stock7
Options to Purchase Class B Units7
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Amount
Fair Value1
Amount
Fair Value1
9,372 $
300,931 $
10.67
7.04
40,500 $
620,023 $
11.11
7.11
266,298 $
5.97
232,667 $
2,442,948 $
2,216,064 $
— $
1.95 2,630,000 $
3.61
— $
5,200 $
—
— $
— $
—
—
50,000 $
320,000 $
7.04
2.30
—
9.61
3.04
3.04
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Represents the weighted average grant date estimated fair value per share, unit, or option.
Represents Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). These units vest immediately upon grant, but may
not be exchanged pursuant to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the operating company until the seventh anniversary of
the date of grant. These units are also not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement between the Company and members
of the operating company.
Represents phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). These phantom units
vest ratably over four years, but may not be exchanged pursuant to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the operating
company until seven years after the date they vest. These units are also not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement
between the Company and members of the operating company.
Represents options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). Of these
options, 1,062,820 become exercisable immediately and 1,380,128 become exercisable five years from the date of grant. Upon exercise, the
resulting Delayed Exchange Class B units may not be exchanged pursuant the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement until the
seventh anniversary of the exercise date and are not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Represents phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). These phantom units
vest ratably over ten years and are not entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents until vested. Upon vesting, the resulting Delayed
Exchange Class B units may not be exchanged pursuant the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement until the seventh anniversary of
the vesting date and are not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Represents phantom Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). These phantom units vest ratably over
ten years and are not entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents until vested.
Represents options to purchase shares of Class A common stock or Class B units under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan (as defined below), respectively. These options become exercisable five years from the date of grant.
F-17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
As part of the Company's year-end bonus structure, certain employee members may elect to have all or part of
year-end cash compensation paid in the form of cash, or equity issued pursuant to Pzena Investment Management,
LLC Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan”). For the year ended
December 31, 2018, $4.1 million of cash compensation was elected to be paid in the form of equity, which was
issued and vested immediately on January 1, 2019. Details of these awards issued on January 1, 2019 are as
follows:
Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B Units2
Options to Purchase Delayed Exchange Class B
Units3
Delayed Exchange Class B Units4
January 1,
2019
Fair Value1
3.61
Amount
1,301,936 $
94,488
$
585,682 $
1.27
5.97
1
2
3
4
Represents the weighted average grant date estimated fair value per share, unit, or option as of December 31, 2018.
Represents phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as defined below). These phantom units
vest ratably over ten years and are not entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents until vested. Upon vesting, the resulting Delayed
Exchange Class B units may not be exchanged pursuant the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement until the seventh anniversary of
the vesting date and are not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Represents options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These options are exercisable on
the date of grant. Upon exercise, the resulting Delayed Exchange Class B units may not be exchanged pursuant the Amended and Restated
Operating Agreement until the seventh anniversary of the exercise date and are not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable
Agreement.
Represents Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These units vest immediately upon grant, but may not be exchanged
pursuant to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the operating company until the seventh anniversary of the date of grant.
These units are also not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement between the Company and members of the operating
company.
Pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the operating company issues Class B units, phantom Class B units,
and options to purchase Class B units. The Company also issues Delayed Exchange Class B units pursuant to the
2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These Delayed Exchange Class B units may not be exchanged pursuant to the Amended
and Restated Operating Agreement of the operating company until at least the seventh anniversary of the date they
vest. These Delayed Exchange Class B units are also not entitled to any benefit under the Tax Receivable
Agreement between the Company and current, future and past members of the operating company. The Company
also issues phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units and options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units.
Under the Pzena Investment Management, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan”), the
Company issues shares of restricted Class A common stock, options to purchase Class A common stock and
contingently vesting options to acquire shares of Class A common stock. During the year ended December 31,
2018, 54,388 options to purchase Class B units were forfeited in connection with an employee departure. During the
year ended December 31, 2017, 1,000,000 contingently vesting options were forfeited in connection with an
employee departure. Sadly, the Company's Executive Vice President and Executive Committee member passed
away on July 22, 2017. As a result, 549,888 phantom Class B units did not vest and were forfeited. During the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no contingently vesting options vested.
Under the Pzena Investment Management, LLC Amended and Restated Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”), eligible
employees whose compensation is in excess of certain thresholds are required to defer a portion of that excess.
These deferred amounts may be invested, at the employee’s discretion, in certain investment options as designated
by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. Amounts deferred in any calendar year
reduce that year’s compensation expense and are amortized and vest ratably over a four year period commencing the
following year. The Company also issued to certain of its employees deferred compensation with certain investment
options that also vest ratably over a four years period. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the liability associated
with deferred compensation investment accounts was $1.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. During the year
ended December 31, 2017, the vesting of 5,739 deferred compensation phantom Class B units and $1.5 million in
deferred compensation investments was accelerated due to both the passing of the Company's Executive Vice
President and an employee departure.
Pursuant to the Pzena Investment Management, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the
“Director Plan”), non-employee directors may elect to have all or part of the compensation otherwise payable in
F-18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
cash, deferred in the form of phantom shares of Class A common stock of the Company issued under the 2007
Equity Incentive Plan. Elections to defer compensation under the Director Plan are made on a year-to-year basis.
Elections of deferred stock units result in the issuance of phantom shares of Class A common stock. Distributions
under the Director Plan shall be made in a single distribution of shares of our Class A common stock at such time as
elected by the participant when the deferral was made. Since inception of the Director Plan in 2009, the Company’s
directors have elected to defer 100% of their compensation in the form of phantom shares of Class A common stock.
Amounts deferred in any calendar year are amortized over the calendar year and reflected as General and
Administrative Expense. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the directors were awarded 51,500
and 44,786 phantom shares of Class A common stock, respectively, reflecting the annual deferral of compensation
and additional phantom shares issued as of each date, and in the amount of dividends and/or special dividends and
distributions that are paid with respect to Class A common stock of the Company. As of December 31, 2018 and
2017, there were 387,516 and 336,016 phantom shares of Class A common stock outstanding, respectively. There
were no distributions made under the Director Plan during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
The Company uses a fair value method in recording the expense associated with the granting of Class B units,
Delayed Exchange Class B units, phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units, options to purchase Class A common
stock and Class B units, options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units, and shares of Class A common stock
under the 2006 and 2007 Equity Incentive Plans; phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units under the Bonus Plan;
and phantom shares of Class A common stock under the Director Plan.
The fair value of awarded restricted shares of Class A common stock under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and
phantom shares of Class A common stock under the Director Plan is determined based on the closing market price
of our Class A common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of awarded Class B units under the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan is determined by reference to the market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant,
since Class B units are exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis and adjusted
for the impact of award terms on the value of the award. Certain of the restricted shares of Class A common stock
are not entitled to dividends or dividend equivalents while unvested. The fair value of these awards is determined
based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, net of the present value of the
dividends using the applicable risk-free interest rate. The Delayed Exchange Class B Units have a seven years
exchange limitation and are not entitled to any benefits under the tax receivable agreement. The fair value of these
awards is determined based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, net of the
effects of these terms. The Company also issued options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units. The fair
value of these options is determined using an option pricing model where the strike price reflects the fair value of
Delayed Exchange Class B units on the date of grant. Certain of the phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units are
not entitled to dividends or dividend equivalents while unvested.
The fair value of options to purchase Class B units, shares of Class A common stock, and Delayed Exchange
Class B units is determined by using an appropriate option pricing model on the grant date. For each of the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company issued options valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Weighted Average Time Until Exercise
Expected Volatility
Risk-Free Rate
Dividend Yield
2018
January 1,
2017
January 1,
7 years
7 years
42%
2.36%
4.50%
42%
2.25%
3.15%
Weighted Average Time Until Exercise — The expected term is based on the Company’s historical experience
and the particular terms of its option awards.
Expected Volatility — Due to the lack of sufficient historical data for the Company’s own shares, the Company
based its expected volatility on a representative peer group.
Risk-Free Rate — The risk-free rate for periods within the expected term of the options is based on the interest
rate of a traded zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a term equal to the options’ expected term on the date of grant.
F-19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Dividend Yield — The dividend yield is based on the Company’s anticipated dividend payout over the expected
term of the option awards.
The following is a summary of the option activity for the two years ended December 31, 2018:
Beginning Balance
Options Granted1
Options Cancelled
Options Exercised
Ending Balance
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Options
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Options
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
6,191,502 $
2,442,948
(185,388)
(51,500)
8,397,562 $
9.59
7.04
10.29
4.33
8.87
4,703,722 $
3,000,000
(1,163,310)
(348,910)
6,191,502 $
11.53
7.95
13.07
9.98
9.59
1
Options granted for the year ended December 31, 2018 include 2,442,948 of options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units. Options
granted for the year ended December 31, 2017 include 2,630,000 of options to purchase Delayed Exchange Class B units, 320,000 options
to purchase Class B units, and 50,000 options to purchase Class A common stock.
The weighted average grant-date fair values per options issued in 2018 and 2017 were $1.95 and $2.39,
respectively. The 51,500 options exercised in 2018 resulted in 29,698 net Class B units issued, as a result of the
redemption of 21,802 Class B units for the cashless exercise of the options. The 348,910 options exercised in 2017
resulted in 41,781 net Class B units issued, as a result of the redemption of 257,129 Class B units for the cashless
exercise of the options and 16,722 net Class A shares issued, as a result of the redemption of 33,278 Class A shares
for the cashless exercise of options. The 185,388 and 1,163,310 options to purchase Class B units that were
cancelled during 2018 and 2017, respectively, were in connection with employee departures and option expirations.
Exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:
Number
Outstanding as of
December 31, 2018
61,334
5,944,094
2,392,134
8,397,562
Options Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
3.0 $
7.4
4.2
6.5 $
$4.22 – $5.00
$5.00 – $10.00
$10.00 – $15.00
$4.22 – $15.00
Options Exercisable
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Number
Exercisable as of
December 31, 2018
61,334
1,933,966
22,134
2,017,434
Weighted-
Average Remaining
Contractual Life
3.0 $
5.4
5.0
5.3 $
4.77
7.20
13.11
8.87
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
4.77
7.44
10.26
7.39
Based on the closing market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on December 31, 2018, the
aggregate intrinsic value of the Company’s options was as follows:
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Options
Outstanding
Options
Exercisable
(in thousands)
8,843 $
2,571
$
F-20
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Phantom Class B units and Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued pursuant to the Bonus Plan, which
vest ratably over four years, are summarized as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Phantom
Units
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Price
Phantom
Units
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Price
Beginning Balance
Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B Units Issued1
Vesting of Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B Units1
Vesting of Phantom Class B Units
Ending Balance
470,692 $
266,298
(149,973)
—
587,017 $
6.76
5.97
6.59
—
6.45
335,569 $
232,667
(91,805)
(5,739)
470,692 $
6.52
7.04
6.30
11.76
6.76
1
Represents phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. These phantom units vest ratably over
four years, but may not be exchanged pursuant to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the operating company until seven
years after the date they vest. These units are also not entitled to any benefits under the Tax Receivable Agreement between the Company
and members of the operating company.
Phantom Class B units and Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B units issued pursuant to the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, which vest ratably over 10 years and are not eligible to receive dividends or dividend equivalents
until vested, are summarized as follows:
Beginning Balance
Phantom Delayed Exchange Class B Units Issued
Phantom Class B Units Issued
Vesting of Phantom Class B Units
Phantom Class B Units Forfeited
Ending Balance
For the Years Ended December 31,
2018
Phantom
Units
Outstanding
1,725,465 $
2,216,064
—
(329,503)
—
3,612,026 $
2017
Weighted
Average
Price
Phantom
Units
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Price
5.05 2,599,656 $
—
3.61
—
5,200
(329,503)
4.89
(549,888)
—
4.18 1,725,465 $
4.92
—
9.61
4.89
4.55
5.05
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had approximately $39.5 million and $32.6 million,
respectively, in unrecorded compensation expense related to unvested awards issued pursuant to its Bonus Plan;
Class B units, option grants, and phantom Class B units issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan; and restricted
Class A common stock issued under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company anticipates that this unrecorded
cost will amortize over the respective vesting periods of the awards.
As of December 31, 2018, the total units and shares remaining available for future issuance under the equity
incentive plans are as follows:
Plan
Pzena Investment Management, LLC
2006 Equity Incentive Plan
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
2007 Equity Incentive Plan
Total
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
For Future Issuance
Under Equity
Incentive Plans
9,306,795
13,255,393
22,562,188
F-21
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 4 — Employee Benefit Plans
The Profit Sharing and Savings Plan is a defined contribution profit sharing plan with a 401(k) deferral
component. All full-time employees and certain part-time employees who have met the age and length of service
requirements are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan allows participating employees to make elective
deferrals of compensation up to the annual limits which are set by law. The plan provides for a discretionary annual
contribution by the operating company which is determined by a formula based on the salaries of eligible employees
as defined by the plan. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the expense recognized in connection
with this plan was $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Note 5 — Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the Company’s net income attributable to its common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period.
Under the two-class method of computing basic earnings per share, basic earnings per share is calculated by
dividing net income for basic earnings per share by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. The two-class method includes an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share
for each participating security according to dividends declared and undistributed earnings for the period. The
Company's net income for basis earnings per share is reduced by the amount allocated to participating restricted
shares of Class A common stock which participate for purposes of calculating earnings per share.
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s basic earnings per share was determined as
follows:
For the Years Ended December
31,
2018
2017
(in thousands, except share and
per share amounts)
Net Income Allocated to:
6,907
Class A Common Stock
$
1
Participating Shares of Restricted Class A Common Stock
$
Net Income for Basic Earnings Per Share
6,908
17,678,874 17,335,689
Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
13,794 $
—
13,794 $
Add: Participating Shares of Restricted Class A Common
Stock1
Total Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
Basic Earnings per Share
2,659
—
17,678,874 17,338,348
0.40
$
0.78 $
1
Certain unvested shares of Class A common stock granted to employees have nonforfeitable rights to dividends and therefore participate
fully in the results of the Company from the date they are granted. They are included in the computation of basic earnings per share using
the two-class method for participating securities.
Diluted earnings per share adjusts this calculation to reflect the impact of all outstanding membership units of
the operating company, phantom Class B units, phantom Class A common stock, phantom Delayed Exchange Class
B units, outstanding Class B unit options, options to purchase Class A common stock, and restricted Class A
common stock, to the extent they would have a dilutive effect on earnings per share for the reporting period. Net
income for diluted earnings per share generally assumes all outstanding operating company membership units are
converted into Company stock at the beginning of the reporting period and the resulting change to the Company's
net income associated with its increased interest in the operating company is taxed at the Company’s effective tax
rate, exclusive of one-time charges and adjustments associated with both the valuation allowance and the liability to
selling and converting shareholders. When this conversion results in an increase in earnings per share or a decrease
in loss per share, diluted net income and diluted earnings per share are assumed to be equal to basic net income and
basic earnings per share for the reporting period.
F-22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s diluted net income was determined as
follows:
For the Years Ended December
31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests of Pzena
Investment Management, LLC
$
Less: Assumed Corporate Income Taxes
Assumed After-Tax Income of Pzena Investment
Management, LLC
Net Income of Pzena Investment Management, Inc
Diluted Net Income
54,733 $
(13,180)
52,379
19,223
41,553
13,794
55,347 $
33,156
6,908
40,064
$
Under the two-class method, earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income for diluted earnings per
share by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of
any potential common shares outstanding during the period using the more dilutive of the treasury method or two-
class method. The two-class method includes an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for
each participating security according to dividends declared and undistributed earnings for the period. The
Company’s net income for diluted earnings per share is reduced by the amount allocated to participating Class B
units for purposes of calculating earnings per share. Dividend equivalent distributions paid per share on the
Company’s unvested Class B units are equal to the dividends paid per share of Class A common stock of the
Company.
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s diluted earnings per share were determined
as follows:
Diluted Net Income Allocated to:
For the Years Ended December
31,
2018
2017
(In thousands, except share and
per share amounts)
Class A Common Stock
$
Participating Shares of Restricted Class A Common Stock
Participating Class B Units
Total Diluted Net Income Attributable to Shareholders
Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
Dilutive Effect of Class B Units
Dilutive Effect of Options1
Dilutive Effect of Phantom Units
Dilutive Effect of Restricted Shares of Class A Common
Stock2
Dilutive Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
Add: Participating Class B Units3
Total Dilutive Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
Diluted Earnings per Share4
55,308 $
—
39
55,347 $
40,025
1
38
$
40,064
17,678,874 17,338,348
51,617,114 51,108,030
1,046,710
583,669
1,482,228 1,767,130
60,618
72,299
71,885,544 70,869,476
64,886
71,934,144 70,934,362
0.56
$
48,600
0.77 $
1
2
3
Represents the dilutive effect of options to purchase Class B units, Delayed Exchange Class B units, and Class A common stock.
Certain restricted shares of Class A common stock granted to employees are not entitled to dividend or dividend equivalent payments until
they are vested and are therefore non-participating securities and are not included in the computation of basic earnings per share. They are
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method.
Unvested Class B Units granted to employees have nonforfeitable rights to dividends and therefore participate fully in the results of the
operating company's operations from the date they are granted. They are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share using the
two-class method for participating securities.
F-23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
4
Reflects the calculation of diluted earnings per share which results in an increase in earnings per share during the year ended December 31,
2017. Therefore, diluted earnings per share is presented on the statement of operations equal to basic earnings per share.
Approximately 0.4 million options to purchase Class B units, 0.1 million options to purchase shares of Class A
common stock, and 2.0 million contingent options to purchase shares of Class A common stock were excluded from
the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2018, as their inclusion would have
had an antidilutive effect based on current market prices or because the option had contingent vesting requirements
that were not met. Approximately 0.6 million options to purchase Class B units, 0.1 million options to purchase
shares of Class A common stock, and 2.0 million contingent options to purchase Class A common stock were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017, as their inclusion
would have had an antidilutive effect based on current market prices or because the option had contingent vesting
requirements that were not met.
Note 6 — Shareholders’ Equity
The Company functions as the sole managing member of the operating company. As a result, the Company: (i)
consolidates the financial results of the operating company and reflects the membership interest in it that it does not
own as a non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements; and (ii) recognizes income generated from
its economic interest in the operating company’s net income. Class A and Class B units of the operating company
have the same economic rights per unit. As of December 31, 2018, the holders of Class A common stock (through
the Company) and the holders of Class B units of the operating company held approximately 26.4% and 73.6%,
respectively, of the economic interests in the operations of the business. As of December 31, 2017, the holders of
Class A common stock (through the Company) and the holders of Class B units of the operating company held
approximately 26.3% and 73.7%, respectively, of the economic interests in the operations of the business.
Each Class B unit of the operating company has a corresponding share of the Company’s Class B common
stock, par value $0.000001 per share. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock entitles its holder to five
votes, until the first time that the number of shares of Class B common stock outstanding constitutes less than 20%
of the number of all shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding. From this time and thereafter, each share
of the Company’s Class B common stock entitles its holder to one vote. When a Class B unit is exchanged for a
share of the Company’s Class A common stock or forfeited, a corresponding share of the Company’s Class B
common stock will automatically be redeemed and canceled. Conversely, to the extent that the Company causes the
operating company to issue additional Class B units to employees pursuant to its equity incentive plan, these
additional holders of Class B units would be entitled to receive a corresponding number of shares of the Company’s
Class B common stock (including if the Class B units awarded are subject to vesting).
All holders of the Company’s Class B common stock have entered into a stockholders’ agreement, pursuant to
which they agreed to vote all shares of Class B common stock then held by them, with the majority of votes of Class
B common stockholders taken in a preliminary vote of the Class B common stockholders.
The outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A common stock represent 100% of the rights of the holders of
all classes of the Company’s capital stock to receive distributions, except that holders of Class B common stock will
have the right to receive the class’s par value upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Pursuant to the operating agreement of the operating company, each vested Class B unit is exchangeable for a
share of the Company’s Class A common stock, subject to certain exchange timing and volume limitations.
On December 21, 2018 and December 21, 2017, certain of the operating company’s members exchanged an
aggregate of 1,141,663 and 855,535, respectively, of their Class B units for an equivalent number of shares of Class
A common stock of the Company. These acquisitions of additional operating company membership interests were
treated as reorganizations of entities under common control as required by the Business Combinations Topic of the
FASB ASC.
F-24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The incremental assets and liabilities assumed in the exchanges were recorded on December 21, 2018 and
December 21, 2017 as follows:
Pzena Investment Management, LLC Members' Capital
Pzena Investment Management, LLC Accumulated Deficit
Realizable Deferred Tax Asset
Net Tax Receivable Liability to Converting Unitholders
Total
Common Stock, at Par
Additional Paid-in Capital
Total
December 21,
2018
December 21,
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
$
$
15,341 $
(13,707)
1,867
(1,587)
1,914 $
11 $
1,903
1,914 $
11,453
(10,396)
2,090
(1,538)
1,609
9
1,600
1,609
The Company announced a share repurchase program on April 24, 2012. The Board of Directors authorized the
Company to repurchase an aggregate of $10 million of the Company’s outstanding Class A common stock and the
operating company’s Class B units on the open market and in private transactions in accordance with applicable
securities laws. On February 5, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional
$20 million of the Company's outstanding Class A common stock and Class B units of the operating company. On
April 19, 2018, the Company announced an additional increase of $30 million in the aggregate amount authorized
under the current program to repurchase Class A common stock and Class B units. The timing, number and value of
common shares and units repurchased are subject to the Company’s discretion. The Company’s share repurchase
program is not subject to an expiration date and may be suspended, discontinued, or modified at any time, for any
reason.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased and retired 860,006 shares of Class A
common stock and 48,060 Class B units at an average price per share of $9.99 and $8.13, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2017, the Company purchased and retired 150,727 shares of Class A common stock and
33,715 Class B units at an average price per share of $9.88 and $10.89, respectively. The Company records the
repurchase of shares and units at cost based on the trade date of the transaction.
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, 897,813 and 31,803 Delayed Exchange Class B units
were issued for approximately $5.2 million and $0.2 million in cash, respectively, to certain employee members
pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
Note 7 — Non-Controlling Interests
Non-Controlling Interests in the operations of the Company’s operating company and consolidated subsidiaries
are comprised of the following:
For the Years Ended December
31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
Non-Controlling Interests of Pzena Investment Management,
LLC
Non-Controlling Interests of Consolidated Subsidiaries
Non-Controlling Interests
$
$
54,733 $
(208)
54,525 $
52,379
863
53,242
Distributions to non-controlling interests represent tax allocations and dividend equivalents paid to the members
of the operating company, as well as redemptions by investors in the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries.
F-25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 8 — Investments
The following is a summary of Investments:
Equity Investments, at Fair Value
Equity Securities
Mutual Funds
Total Equity Investments, at Fair Value
Trading Securities
U.S. Treasury Bills
Total Trading Securities
Investment in Equity Method Investees
Total
As of
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
$
9,567 $
24,653
34,220 $
5,283
5,283
10,967
50,470 $
5,452
—
5,452
—
—
16,285
21,737
Investment Securities, Trading
Investments, at Fair Value consisted of the following at December 31, 2018:
Equity Securities
Mutual Funds
Total Equity Investments, at Fair Value
U.S. Treasury Bills
Total Trading Securities
Cost
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss) Fair Value
(in thousands)
$
$
10,112 $
24,677
34,789 $
(545) $
(24)
(569) $
9,567
24,653
34,220
Cost
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss) Fair Value
(in thousands)
$
$
5,283 $
5,283 $
— $
— $
5,283
5,283
Investments, at Fair Value consisted of the following at December 31, 2017:
Equity Securities
Total Equity Investments, at Fair Value
Investments in Equity Method Investees
Cost
Unrealized
(Gain)/Loss Fair Value
(in thousands)
$
$
4,399 $
4,399 $
1,053 $
1,053 $
5,452
5,452
The operating company sponsors and provides investment management services to certain private investment
partnerships and Pzena mutual funds through which it offers its investment strategies. The Company has made
investments in certain of these private investment partnerships and mutual funds to satisfy its obligations under the
Company's deferred compensation program and provide the initial cash investment in our mutual funds. The
Company holds a non-controlling interest and exercises significant influence in these entities, and accounts for its
investments as equity method investments which are included in Investments on the consolidated statements of
financial condition. On November 9, 2017 and December 21, 2017 due to additional subscriptions into the Pzena
Mid Cap Value Fund and Pzena Long/Short Value Fund, respectively, the Company's ownership decreased to 41.7%
and 35.5%, respectively. As the Company was no longer deemed to control the funds, it deconsolidated the entities,
F-26
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
removed the related assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest from its balance sheet and classified the
Company's remaining investments as equity method investments. As of December 31, 2018, the Company's
investments range between 1% and 17% of the capital of these entities and have an aggregate carrying value of
$11.0 million.
Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements
The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC defines fair value as the price that
would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC also
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and a valuation hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs
used in the valuation of an asset or liability. Classification within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The valuation hierarchy contains three levels: (i) valuation
inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets (Level 1); (ii) valuation
inputs are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted market prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other observable inputs directly or indirectly related to the asset
or liability being measured (Level 2); and (iii) valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement (Level 3).
Level 1 assets consist primarily of certain cash equivalents and equity investments held at fair value. Cash
investments in actively traded money market funds are measured at net asset values. Equity securities are exchange-
traded securities with quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of investments in mutual funds are based on
published net asset values.
Level 2 assets consist of debt securities for which the fair values are determined using independent third-party
broker or dealer price quotes. U.S. Treasury bills are valued upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable or corroborated by observable market data. The fair value of corporate bonds is measured using various
techniques, which consider recently executed transactions in securities of the issuer or comparable issuers, market
price quotations (where observable), bond spreads and fundamental data relating to the issuer.
Also included in the Company's consolidated statements of financial condition are investments in American
Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) and Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”). Certain of the Company’s ADRs and
GDRs may not be listed on a public exchange and may be valued using an evaluated price based on a compilation of
observable market information. Inputs used include currency factors, depositary receipt ratios, exchange prices of
underlying and common stock of the same issuer, and adjustments for corporate actions. ADRs and GDRs valued
using an evaluated price have been classified as Level 2.
The investments in equity method investees are held at their carrying value.
The following tables present these instruments’ fair value at December 31, 2018:
Cash Equivalents:
Money Market Funds
U.S. Treasury Bills
Corporate Bonds
Equity Investments, at Fair Value:
Equity Securities
Mutual Funds
Trading Securities:
U.S. Treasury Bills
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
$
23 $
—
—
— $
21,293
3,064
— $
—
—
23
21,293
3,064
8,960
24,653
607
—
—
—
9,567
24,653
—
33,636 $
5,283
30,247 $
$
—
— $
5,283
63,883
F-27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The following tables present these instruments’ fair value at December 31, 2017:
Equity Investments, at Fair Value:
Equity Securities
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
$
5,452 $
— $
— $
5,452
Transfers among levels, if any, are recorded as of the beginning of the reporting period. For the years ended
December 31, 2018, and 2017, there were no transfers between levels. In addition, the Company did not hold any
Level 3 securities as of December 31, 2018 and did not hold any Level 2 or Level 3 securities as of December 31,
2017.
Note 10 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, is comprised of the following:
Leasehold Improvements
Furniture and Fixtures
Computer Hardware
Computer Software
Office Equipment
Total
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
Total
As of
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
(in thousands)
6,832 $
1,191
530
370
195
9,118
(3,724)
5,394 $
6,832
1,190
686
333
281
9,322
(3,063)
6,259
$
$
Depreciation is included in general and administrative expense and totaled $1.0 million and $1.0 million for the
years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Note 11 — Related Party Transactions
For the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, the Company earned $1.0 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, in investment advisory fees from unconsolidated VIEs which receive investment management services
from the Company.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, the Company offered loans to employees, excluding
executive officers, for the purpose of financing tax obligations associated with compensatory stock and unit vesting.
Loans are generally written for a seven-year period, at an interest rate equivalent to the Applicable Federal Rate,
payable in annual installments, and collateralized by units held by the employee. These loans are full recourse in
nature and totaled $1.3 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The operating company, as the investment adviser for certain Pzena branded SEC-registered mutual funds,
private placement funds, and non-U.S. funds, has contractually agreed to waive a portion or all of its management
fees and pay fund expenses to ensure that the annual operating expenses of the funds stay below certain established
total expense ratio thresholds. The Company recognized $1.1 million of such expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2018, and $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2018, the operating company withdrew its initial cash investment in Pzena Emerging
Market Value Fund and removed the equity method investment from its balance sheet. Due to the timing of trades,
the Company recorded the transaction as a $2.8 million Receivable from Related Parties as of December 31, 2018.
The operating company manages the personal funds of certain of the Company’s employees, including the CEO
and its two Presidents. The operating company also manages accounts beneficially owned by a private fund in
F-28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
which certain of the Company’s executive officers invest. Investments by employees in individual accounts are
permitted only at the discretion of the executive committee of the operating company, but are generally not subject
to the same minimum investment levels that are required of outside investors. The operating company also manages
the personal funds of some of its employees’ family members. Pursuant to the respective investment management
agreements, the operating company waives or reduces its regular advisory fees for these accounts and personal
funds. In addition, the operating company pays custody and administrative fees for certain of these accounts and
personal funds in order to incubate products or preserve performance history. The aggregate value of the fees that
the Company waived related to the Company’s executive officers, other employees, and family members, was
approximately $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, and $0.8 million in the year ended December 31,
2017. The aggregate value of the custody and administrative fees paid related to the Company’s executive offers,
other employees, and family members was approximately $0.1 million in the years 2018 and 2017.
Pursuant to a tax receivable agreement signed between the members of the operating company and the
Company, 85% of the cash savings generated by tax elections discussed in Note 13 — Income Taxes, are distributed
to the selling and converting shareholders upon the realization of this benefit. For the years ended December 31,
2018, and 2017, $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of such payments were made to certain directors,
executive officers and employees of the Company.
Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that include indemnities in favor of third
parties, such as engagement letters with advisers and consultants. In certain cases, the Company may have recourse
against third parties with respect to these indemnities. The Company maintains insurance policies that may provide
coverage against certain claims under these indemnities. The Company has had no claims or payments pursuant to
these agreements, and it believes the likelihood of a claim being made is remote. Utilizing the methodology in the
Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company’s estimate of the value of such guarantees is de minimis, and,
therefore, no accrual has been made in the consolidated financial statements.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company moved to its new corporate headquarters. The new
office space is leased under a non-cancellable operating lease agreement that expires on December 31, 2025. The
Company reflects minimum lease expense for its headquarters on a straight-line basis over the lease term. During
September 2016, the Company terminated its five-year sublease agreement which commenced on May 1, 2015. The
Company entered into a new four-year sublease agreement commencing on October 1, 2016 that is cancellable by
either the Company or sublessee given appropriate notice after the thirty-first month following the commencement
of the sublease agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company amended its sublease
agreement which became cancellable at any time after December 31, 2018, given thirty days prior written notice.
During December 2018, the Company signed a non-cancellable amendment to the corporate headquarters lease
to obtain additional space that expires on December 31, 2025. In accordance with ASC 840, Leases, the lease term
has not yet commenced because the Company does not have the right to use or control the physical access to the
additional space until early 2019. As such, the Company has not recorded any lease expenses associated with the
amendment to the corporate headquarter lease for the year ended December 31, 2018.
F-29
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Lease expenses were $2.1 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2018, and
2017, and are included in general and administrative expense. Lease expense for each of the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, was net of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in sublease income. Future
minimum lease payments are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 and thereafter
Total
Minimum
Payments
(in thousands)
2,353
2,574
2,574
2,574
2,596
5,213
17,884
$
Note 13 — Income Taxes
The operating company is a limited liability company that has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax
purposes. Neither it nor the Company’s other consolidated subsidiaries have made a provision for federal or state
income taxes because it is the individual responsibility of each of these entities’ members (including the Company)
to separately report their proportionate share of the respective entity’s taxable income or loss. The operating
company has made a provision for New York City UBT and its U.K. consolidated subsidiary has made a provision
for U.K. corporate taxes. The Company, as a “C” corporation under the Internal Revenue Code, is liable for federal,
state and local taxes on the income derived from its economic interest in its operating company, which is net of UBT
and U.K. taxes. Correspondingly, in its consolidated financial statements, the Company reports both the operating
company’s provision for UBT and U.K. taxes, as well as its provision for federal, state and local corporate taxes.
The components of the income tax expense are as follows:
Current Provision:
Unincorporated and Other Business Taxes
Local Corporate Tax
State Corporate Tax
Federal Corporate Tax
Total Current Provision
Deferred Provision:
Unincorporated and Other Business Taxes
Local Corporate Tax
State Corporate Tax
Federal Corporate Tax
Total Deferred Provision
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act2
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations3
Total Income Tax Expense
For the Year Ended December
31,
20181
2017
(in thousands)
$
$
$
$
$
2,778 $
27
18
335
3,158 $
— $
407
266
3,614
4,287 $
—
333
7,778 $
2,846
—
—
5
2,851
16
423
263
5,497
6,199
26,468
(1,006)
34,512
1
2
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the operating company recognized a $0.5 million tax benefit associated with the reversal of
uncertain tax position liabilities and interest related to unincorporated and other business tax expenses.
Reflects income tax expense resulting from the re-measurement of the deferred tax asset related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in the
United States during the fourth quarter of 2017.
F-30
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
3
Reflects the impact of a change in the historical calculation of the 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2018, and the net impact of a change in the historical calculation of the 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset and
corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.
A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes reported for financial reporting purposes, and the
application of the statutory U.S. Federal tax rate to the reported income before income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:
$
Federal Corporate Tax
State and Local Corporate Tax, net of Federal Benefit
Unincorporated and Other Business Tax
Non-Controlling Interests
Decrease in Liability to Selling and Converting
Shareholders
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act2
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-Up Calculations3
Other
Income Tax Expense
$
For the Year Ended December 31,
20181
2017
Amount
% of Pretax
Income
Amount
% of Pretax
Income
(in thousands, except % amounts)
15,980
718
2,195
(11,450)
21.0% $
0.9%
2.9%
(15.0)%
32,185
686
1,889
(18,102)
—
—
333
2
7,778
—%
—%
0.4%
—%
10.2% $
(7,078)
26,468
(1,006)
(530)
34,512
34.0%
0.7%
2.0%
(19.1)%
(7.5)%
28.0%
(1.1)%
(0.5)%
36.5%
1
2
3
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the operating company recognized a $0.5 million tax benefit associated with the reversal of
uncertain tax position liabilities and interest related to unincorporated and other business tax expenses.
Reflects income tax expense resulting from the re-measurement of the deferred tax asset related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in the
United States during the fourth quarter of 2017.
Reflects the impact of a change in the historical calculation of the 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2018, and the net impact of a change in the historical calculation of the 754 step-ups and related deferred tax asset and
corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC establishes the minimum threshold for recognizing, and a system for
measuring, the benefits of tax return positions in financial statements.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of total unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2017
Decreases Related to Prior Year Tax Positions
Increases Related to Current Year Tax Positions
Balance at December 31, 2018
$
$
4,672
(374)
2,162
6,460
Balance at December 31, 2016
Increases Related to Current Year Tax Positions
Balance at December 31, 2017
$
$
2,802
1,870
4,672
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
(in thousands)
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
Income Tax Expense on the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
F-31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Company had $6.5 million and $4.7 million in unrecognized tax benefits, that, if recognized, would affect the
provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had interest related to unrecognized
tax benefits of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As a result of legislative changes, changes in judgment
related to recognition or measurement, or potential settlements with taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that
the company's gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero
to $4.5 million.
The Company and the operating company are generally no longer subject to U.S. Federal or state and local
income tax examinations by tax authorities for any year prior to 2015. All tax years subsequent to, and including,
2015 are considered open and subject to examination by tax authorities.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had available for U.S. Federal, state and local income tax reporting
purposes, a net operating loss carryforward of $5.3 million, respectively, which expires in varying amounts during
the tax years 2029 through 2035. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company used the remaining
balance of the net operating loss carryforward.
The acquisition of the Class B units of the operating company, noted below, has allowed the Company to make
an election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 754”) to step up its tax basis in the net assets
acquired. This step up is deductible for tax purposes over a 15-year period.
Pursuant to a tax receivable agreement signed between the members of the operating company and the
Company, 85% of the cash savings generated by this election will be distributed to the selling and converting
shareholders upon the realization of this benefit.
If the Company exercises its right to terminate the tax receivable agreement early, the Company will be
obligated to make an early termination payment to the selling and converting shareholders, based upon the net
present value (based upon certain assumptions and deemed events set forth in the tax receivable agreement) of all
payments that would be required to be paid by the Company under the tax receivable agreement. If certain change of
control events were to occur, the Company would be obligated to make an early termination payment.
As discussed in Note 6, Shareholders’ Equity, on December 21, 2018 and December 21, 2017, certain of the
operating company’s members exchanged an aggregate of 1,141,663 and 855,535, respectively, of their Class B
units for an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock of the Company. The Company elected to step
up its tax basis in the incremental assets acquired in accordance with Section 754. Based on the exchange-date fair
values of the Company’s common stock and the tax basis of the operating company, this election gave rise to a $2.5
million deferred tax asset and corresponding $1.6 million liability to converting shareholders on December 21, 2018,
and a $2.1 million deferred tax asset and corresponding $1.5 million liability to converting shareholders on
December 21, 2017. As required by the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company recorded the effects
of these transactions in equity.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into legislation. The Company has
recorded a deferred tax expense of $26.5 million due to the re-measurement of the deferred tax assets due to a
decrease in the federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% beginning in fiscal year 2018. The Company similarly
reduced the associated liability to selling and converting shareholders by $20.8 million.
The Company identified an adjustment related to a change in the calculation of the 754 step-up in tax basis
impacting the deferred tax assets and corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders. As a result, the
adjustment was made during the year ended December 31, 2017, resulting in a $4.6 million decrease to the deferred
tax assets and a $5.6 million decrease to the corresponding liability to selling and converting shareholders. The
cumulative impact of the adjustment is a net tax benefit of $1.0 million which was recognized as a component of
Income Tax Expense in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 and did not
affect the net cash provided by operating activities, net cash (used in)/ provided by investing activities or net cash
used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. An adjustment was also made during the
year ended December 31, 2018, resulting in a $0.3 million decrease to the deferred tax assets which was recognized
as a component of Income Tax Expense.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the net values of all deferred tax assets were approximately $37.2 million
and $39.6 million, respectively. These deferred tax assets primarily reflect the future tax benefits associated with the
Company's initial public offering, and the subsequent and future exchanges by holders of Class B units of the
F-32
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
operating company for shares of Class A common stock. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not
have a valuation allowance recorded against its deferred tax assets.
The change in the Company’s deferred tax assets for the year ended December 31, 2018, is summarized as
follows:
Balance at December 31, 2017
Deferred Tax (Expense)
Tax Impact of Transactions with Non-Controlling
Shareholders
Unit Exchange
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-
Up Calculations
Operating Loss Carryforward
Balance at December 31, 2018
Section 754
Other
(in thousands)
Total
$
34,713 $
(4,172)
4,926 $
629
39,639
(3,543)
—
1,867
(245)
595
(333)
—
32,075 $
—
(748)
5,157 $
$
(245)
2,462
(333)
(748)
37,232
The change in the Company’s deferred tax liabilities, which is included in other liabilities on the Company’s
consolidated statements of financial condition, for the year ended December 31, 2018, is summarized as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2017
Deferred Tax Benefit
Balance at December 31, 2018
Total
(in thousands)
(2)
$
2
—
$
The change in the Company’s deferred tax assets for the year ended December 31, 2017 is summarized as
follows:
Balance at December 31, 2016
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Adoption of ASU 2016-09
Deferred Tax (Expense)
Unit Exchange
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-
Up Calculations
Operating Loss Carryforward
Balance at December 31, 2017
Section 754
Other
(in thousands)
Total
$
$
68,427 $
(24,114)
—
(5,139)
1,810
(6,271)
—
34,713 $
5,014 $
(2,354)
1,377
756
280
1,669
(1,816)
4,926 $
73,441
(26,468)
1,377
(4,383)
2,090
(4,602)
(1,816)
39,639
The change in the Company’s deferred tax liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2017 is summarized as
follows:
Balance at December 31, 2016
Deferred Tax Expense
Balance at December 31, 2017
Total
(in
thousands)
$
$
(1)
(1)
(2)
F-33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pzena Investment Management, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the net values of the liability to selling and converting shareholders were
approximately $32.4 million and $36.4 million, respectively. The change in the Company’s liability to selling and
converting shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, is summarized as follows:
Beginning Balance
Unit Exchanges
Tax Receivable Agreement Payments
Change in Liability
Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Impact of Change in Historical 754 Step-
Up Calculations
Ending Balance
$
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2018
2017
(in thousands)
36,441 $
1,587
(5,591)
(48)
—
65,485
1,538
(4,155)
—
(20,819)
—
32,389 $
(5,608)
36,441
$
Note 14 — Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated the need for disclosures and/or adjustments resulting from subsequent events through
the date the financial statements were issued.
On February 5, 2019, the Company declared a year-end dividend of $0.49 per share of its Class A common
stock which was paid on March 1, 2019 to holders of record on February 15, 2019.
F-34