Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / Redbank Copper

Redbank Copper

rcp · LSE Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker rcp
Exchange LSE
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · Redbank Copper
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
R
I
T
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
p
l
c

R
e
p
o
r
t

&
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s

f
o
r

t
h
e
y
e
a
r

e
n
d
e
d
3
1
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3

Report & Accounts 
for the year ended 31 December 2023

27 St. James’s Place London SW1A 1NR  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contents

Company Highlights

Strategic Report
Chairman’s Statement
Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model
Manager’s Report
Investment Portfolio
Principal Risks and Viability
Sustainability Report

Governance
Board of Directors
J. Rothschild Capital Management
Corporate Governance Report
Audit and Risk Committee Report
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Report

Financial Statements
Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Parent Company Balance Sheet
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statement
Notes to the Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report

Other Information
Investment Portfolio Reconciliation
Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures
Historical Information and Financial Calendar
Investor Information
Directory

1

3
6
11
21
24
31

37
39
40
52
56
60

64
65
66
67
68
69
70
95

106
107
109
110
111

Notes
Nothing in this Annual Report & Accounts should be construed as advice to buy or sell a particular investment.

RIT Capital Partners plc (RIT or the Company) is a UK public listed company, and as such complies with the UK Financial 
Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Listing Rules. The Company conducts its affairs so as to qualify for approval as an investment trust, 
and has been accepted as an approved investment trust by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), subject to continuing to meet 
the eligibility conditions. As an investment trust, it is not authorised or regulated by the FCA. RIT is classified as an Alternative 
Investment Fund (AIF) in accordance with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).

The investment manager, administrator, and company secretary is J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited (JRCM or the 
Manager), a subsidiary of RIT. JRCM is authorised and regulated by the FCA and is classified as an Alternative Investment Fund 
Manager (AIFM) in accordance with AIFMD. 

This report is printed on Revive 100% White Silk a totally recycled paper produced 
using 100% recycled waste at a mill that has been awarded the ISO 14001 
certificate for environmental management.

The pulp is bleached using a totally chlorine free (TCF) process.  
This report has been produced using vegetable based inks.

Company Highlights

Corporate Objective
To deliver long-term capital growth, while preserving 
shareholders’ capital; to invest without the constraints of a 
formal benchmark, but to deliver for shareholders increases in 
capital value in excess of the relevant indices over time.

Investment Policy
To invest in a widely diversified, international portfolio across a 
range of asset classes, both quoted and unquoted; to allocate 
part of the portfolio to exceptional managers in order to ensure 
access to the best external talent available. 

Performance for the year
RIT NAV per share total return1
CPI plus 3.0%
MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI)
RIT share price total return1         
FTSE 250 Index2

Key data
NAV per share
Share price
Premium/(discount)
Net assets
Gearing1
Average net quoted equity exposure
Ongoing Charges Figure for the year1
  First interim dividend (April)
  Second interim dividend (October)
Total dividend in year

2023
 2,426 pence
1,882 pence
-22.4%
£3,573 million
3.5%
39%
0.77%
19.0  pence
19.0  pence
38.0 pence

2022
2,388 pence
2,125 pence
-11.0%
£3,722 million
6.2%
38%
0.89%
18.5 pence
18.5 pence
37.0 pence

Performance history
RIT NAV per share total return1
CPI plus 3.0% per annum

MSCI All Country World Index
RIT share price total return1              
FTSE 250 Index2

3 Years
10.6%

31.7%
23.5%
-4.1%
4.3%

5 Years
44.2%

42.2%
71.0%
7.5%
28.3%

10 Years
108.8%

77.0%
147.4%
78.7%
61.2%

2023
3.2%
7.0%
18.4%
-9.6%
8.0%

Change 
1.6%
-11.4%
-11.4% pts
-4.0%
-2.7% pts 
1% pts 
-0.12% pts
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%

Since 
inception
3,343%

637%
1,126%
3,407%
1,607%

Performance since inception
4,000%

NAV per share total return 
ACWI
CPI plus 3.0% 

3,500%

3,000%

2,500%

2,000%

1,500%

1,000%

500%

0%

1
9
8
8

1
9
9
3

1
9
9
8

2
0
0
3

2
0
0
8

2
0
1
3

2
0
1
8

2
0
2
3

A description of the terms used in this report, including further information on the calculation of Alternative Performance Measures (APMs), is set 
out in the Glossary and APMs section on page 107.
1 The Group’s designated APMs are the NAV per share total return, share price total return, gearing and the ongoing charges figure.
2 RIT’s shares are a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index, which is not considered a Key Performance Indicator (KPI).

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  1

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Strategic Report

RIT Capital Partners plc

Chairman’s Statement

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton

In the first half of 2023, most major indices traded in 
a relatively narrow range, punctuated by periods of 
weakness and recovery. As the year progressed, a belief 
that interest rates may have peaked led to a rebound in 
developed world equity markets, which was particularly 
marked in the fourth quarter. US equity markets finished 
the year strongly, buoyed by a small number of very large 
technology companies. These so-called ‘magnificent 
seven’ tech stocks accounted for the majority of the S&P 
500’s gains. Excluding these few companies, the overall 
market returns were more modest.

Our net asset value per share finished the year at 2,426 
pence, representing a total return (including dividends) 
of 3.2%, lagging our investment hurdles of CPI+3%, 
which was up 7.0%, and the MSCI ACWI (50% sterling) 
which rose 18.4%. This brings our 10-year performance to 
109%, a more than doubling of shareholders’ capital over 
the period. Our investment portfolio is structured around 
three core pillars of quoted equities, private investments, 
and uncorrelated strategies. During 2023, the portfolio 
saw good performance from quoted equities, driven 
primarily by our successful single stock selection and 
exposure to Japan. Uncorrelated strategies also made a 
positive contribution, helped by the outperformance of 
our credit managers, as well as our investments in carbon 
credits. However, the value of our private investments 
softened, reflecting lower valuations of external funds 
carried over from the fourth quarter of 2022 and our 
carefully considered revaluation of our direct investments. 
Currency was also a headwind; the pound’s appreciation 
of some 5% against the US dollar over the year impacting 
the translated value of our global investments. 

Our portfolio is made up of high-conviction investments 
with differing characteristics and return drivers. While 
there will be times when not all asset classes meet our 
long-term expectations, we remain committed to our 
diversified approach. Our belief is that utilising a carefully 
constructed blend of different assets, overlaid with a top-
down risk management function, remains the best way 
to manage our investments for the long-term benefit of 
shareholders. Our Manager’s Report from J. Rothschild 
Capital Management (JRCM or the Manager) provides a 
detailed review of investment performance, attribution, 
positioning and risk management. 

While the most important driver of our share price 
performance over the long term is our NAV, the Board is 

This brings our 10-year performance 

to 109%, a more than doubling of 
shareholders’ capital over the period.

also intensely focused on the rating of our shares, and 
in this regard 2023 was a difficult year. Discounts for 
investment trusts widened considerably, and our discount 
was no exception ending the year at  -22%, resulting 
in a total shareholder return (including dividends) of 
-9.6%. This is a source of frustration to our shareholders, 
as well as to the Board and our Manager. Directors’ 
shareholdings are disclosed in this Report and our 
colleagues in our Manager also have significant ‘skin in 
the game’, with interests in approximately £18 million RIT 
shares at the year end, reinforcing the close alignment 
with shareholders’ interests. The Board and our Manager 
have been, and continue to be, acutely focused on 
closing the discount.

During 2023, we increased the level of our interactions 
with shareholders, and I am very grateful for their candid 
and thoughtful feedback in these discussions, which 
has been very helpful in guiding our plans to reduce 
the discount. I address below four core topics: private 
investments, capital allocation, costs and marketing. 

Private investments are currently out of favour with 
investors, and discounts for trusts exposed to these 
assets have widened significantly in 2023. RIT has 
always had private investments as a core part of its 
approach, and despite mark-to-market volatility in the 
short term, over the long term the success of these 
investments has been a strong contributor to our returns. 
Our earlier successes have, in part, placed us in a 
challenging position; healthy capital growth is one of the 
main reasons why, over the past five years, our private 
investments had come to represent a higher proportion 
of the portfolio than in the past. We are committed to this 
asset class and continue to believe that our long-standing 
relationships are a source of competitive advantage and 
attractive returns to shareholders. This is reflected in 
our portfolio, which in aggregate is sitting on sizeable 
profits, over and above the capital we invested. The 
returns generated by our private portfolio are set out in 
more detail in the Manager’s Report. Most of our largest 
direct investments are profitable companies with growing 
revenues and earnings. Our close manager relationships 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  3

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Chairman’s Statement

and brand strength, often enable us to access a preferred 
position in the capital structure of a company, with the 
majority of our direct investments having some element 
of downside protection. 

Nevertheless, over the next two years we will look 
to reduce the proportion of the portfolio represented 
by private investments to a level of between around 
a quarter and a third of NAV. This will be achieved by 
organic exits and the continuation of a very high return 
bar for any new investments. Where we see realisations 
from this portfolio, we expect to deploy the capital to 
buy back our shares or to make new investments in the 
liquid portfolio, depending on the level of discount, the 
opportunity set and general portfolio management needs. 
What we will not do is accelerate exits or engage in sales 
at discounts to fair value to the detriment of long-term 
shareholder value.

During 2023, we undertook one of the largest buybacks 
in the investment trust industry, acquiring some 8.6 
million shares at a cost of £163 million, our largest single 
allocation of capital in the year. This generated a strong 
return on investment, increasing the NAV per share 
return for shareholders; the buyback also reinforced 
the confidence that we have both in our NAV and our 
approach. If compelling returns from allocating our capital 
in this way continue to be available, we will retain the 
flexibility to act.

Over the year, we also paid dividends of 38 pence per 
share, an increase of almost 3% over 2022, and totalling 
£57 million. Our approach remains to maintain or increase 
the dividend, subject to the overriding capital preservation 
objective. In 2024, we intend to pay a dividend of 39 
pence per share, an increase of 2.6% over 2023. The 
dividend will be paid as normal in equal instalments in 
April and October, funded from our significant reserves. 

Our long-standing investment approach covers multiple 
asset classes, sectors and geographies, and provides 
shareholders with access to investments, including 
specialist funds, which are not typically accessible to 
individual shareholders. This approach is in line with our 
Investment Policy and has been deployed consistently 
year on year. It is a key driver of RIT’s strong long-term 
performance. By design, it will not be the cheapest 
approach to managing investments, but whenever we 
allocate capital, we do so only if the anticipated risk-
adjusted return, net of all costs (both internal costs and 
any fees paid to external managers) delivers value to 
shareholders.

We continue to look for ways to reduce costs, and 
enhance our communications, with a portion of the 
savings made over the year reinvested into improving our 
marketing and investor relations efforts. We will continue 

4  Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

to invest in more regular and informative direct contact 
with shareholders. 

Our environmental, social, and governance (ESG) 
initiatives remain an area of particular focus, with our 
Manager, JRCM, submitting its first report during the 
year as a signatory of the UN Principles for Responsible 
Investment (UN PRI). We also include our first 
Sustainability Report within this Annual Report, where 
we have collated in one location, all of the activities 
we undertake in respect of our wider commitments to 
society and the environment.

Governance and employees
Following an extensive international search process, 
Maggie Fanari retired from the Board on 29 February, 
joining JRCM on 1 March as its CEO. Maggie has an 
outstanding track record of successfully leading teams 
investing across different asset classes and geographies 
at one of the largest and most respected investment 
companies in the world – Ontario Teachers’ Pension 
Plan – where she was the Senior Managing Director and 
Global Group Head High Conviction Equities. We are 
delighted that Maggie has joined the exceptional team at 
JRCM, and we look forward to working closely with her in 
the execution of the important initiatives outlined above.

Maggie succeeds Francesco Goedhuis, who retired as 
JRCM’s CEO in December as a result of an illness in his 
immediate family. Francesco joined JRCM in 2010 and 
was appointed CEO in 2014. During his 13 years with the 
Manager, Francesco has provided outstanding leadership, 
continuously strengthening both the team in JRCM and 
our exceptional network of investment partners. The 
Board was very pleased to announce recently that he 
will continue his association with RIT in his new role as 
Senior Adviser to JRCM.

After 11 years, Ron Tabbouche (latterly the co-CIO at 
JRCM) retired to join his family in Israel, with Nick Khuu 
appointed to the role of CIO. Nick is a very experienced 
investor across multiple asset classes, having worked at 
leading investment firms in New York and San Francisco. 
He has been with JRCM for over four years operating in 
senior investment roles, and we are delighted with his 
appointment.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to express our 
gratitude to Francesco and Ron for their very significant 
contributions to the Manager and to your Company’s 
performance over more than a decade.

At the end of September, after more than three years as 
a Director of RIT, Maxim Parr retired from the Board to 
take on the position of Chair of JRCM, providing valuable 
leadership and additional resources during a period of 
transition of its senior leadership team. 

Chairman’s Statement

I would like to thank my colleagues on the Board, and 
our talented and dedicated employees for their hard 
work and commitment throughout the year. This diverse 
group shares a single aim – creating long-term value for 
RIT’s shareholders. At a time when the outlook for global 
economies and markets and the geopolitical environment 
are particularly complicated, these colleagues, together 
with our investment partners and advisers, are the key 
to our future success. We have the flexibility to select 
the best investments across any asset class, sector or 
geography, coupled with the strength of our network 
which opens doors to opportunities that others cannot 
access. These remain important differentiators on which 
we will continue to build for the future.

Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild 1936 – 2024
Finally, it is with great sadness that we mourn the 
recent death of our founder and former chairman, Lord 
Jacob Rothschild. Jacob was chairman of the Rothschild 
Investment Trust, subsequently renamed RIT Capital 
Partners plc, from 1971 to 2019. He devised, developed, 
and led the growth of the Company, including its listing 
on the London Stock Exchange in 1988. During his 
tenure, the net asset value increased from £5 million to 
over £3 billion by the time he retired from the Board in 
September 2019 and was granted the title of Honorary 
President. Our thoughts and condolences are with 
Hannah Rothschild, his daughter and current Director, and 
the rest of the Rothschild family at this time. He will be 
missed.

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton
Chairman

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  5

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model

Purpose and strategic aims
Since your Company’s inception, our purpose has been 
consistent, namely to protect and enhance shareholders’ 
wealth over time by providing diversified portfolio 
management. This is set out in our Corporate Objective:

“to deliver long-term capital growth, while preserving 
shareholders’ capital; to invest without the constraints 
of a formal benchmark, but to deliver for shareholders 
increases in capital value in excess of the relevant indices 
over time.”

The origins of the business can be traced back to the 
earlier Rothschild Investment Trust, chaired by Lord Jacob 
Rothschild from 1971, when it had a value of £5 million.  
In its current form, your Company was listed on the 
London Stock Exchange in 1988, and has followed a 
constant and unique approach to this day. Our multi-
asset, flexible investment strategy differentiates us from 
other conventional investment trusts. Our access and 
expertise enable us to build a flexible, diversified portfolio 
that delivers through different economic cycles. We invest 
for the long term in the most compelling opportunities 
across asset classes, geographies and capital structures, 
applying careful risk management, all designed to support 
our most important objective: long-term capital growth.

There may be periods when we will try to place a 
degree of protection of shareholders’ funds ahead of 
growth, but we believe that active management of our 
portfolio exposures is more likely to lead to long-term 
outperformance. We do not target absolute returns and 
therefore, ensuring we have sufficient capital deployed to 
generate long-term growth will naturally result in us being 
exposed to market risk.

Over time, we believe that a combination of healthy 
participation in up markets, and reasonable protection 
in down markets, should help us to compound ahead 
of markets through the cycles. Indeed, since your 
Company’s listing in 1988, we have participated in 74% of 
the monthly market increases but only 41% of the market 
declines. This has resulted in our NAV per share total 
return compounding at 10.5% per annum, a meaningful 
outperformance of global equity markets at 7.3%. Over 
the same period the total return to shareholders was 
10.6% per annum.

A bove all, our approach is long term … 

Our  access and expertise enable us to 

build a flexible, diversified portfolio that 
delivers through different economic cycles.

Investment approach
Our Investment Policy guides our Manager and 
subsidiary, J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited 
(JRCM) as it manages your portfolio:

“to invest in a widely diversified, international portfolio 
across a range of asset classes, both quoted and unquoted; 
to allocate part of the portfolio to exceptional managers in 
order to ensure access to the best external talent available.”

We typically invest your portfolio across multiple 
asset classes, geographies, industries and currencies 
diversified across three investment pillars: quoted 
equities, private investments and uncorrelated strategies. 
This has been the basis of our approach over many years 
and the long-term success of your Company has been 
the result of combining thematic investing with active 
management of a distinctive blend of investments, all 
overlaid with currency positioning and macro exposure 
management. Using our unique access and expertise, we 
create a distinctive blend of high-conviction investments 
of differing profiles and varying underlying return drivers. 
This targets long-term performance with a balance of risk 
and reward that is superior to the wider equity markets.

Our respected name is a hallmark of quality, affording 
us unrivalled access to world-leading investment 
opportunities, allowing us to maximise our ability to 
deploy capital effectively. We have a highly skilled 
investment team with significant depth and breadth of 
experience across different asset classes and we are also 
able to draw on our network to broaden our intellectual 
bandwidth by leveraging specialist insight from our 
Manager’s network of exceptional manager partners. The 
strength of these relationships enables us to invest in 
sectors and geographies which may be inaccessible to 
many investors.

Access
global network & heritage

Flexibility
permanent capital & no benchmark

Expertise
team & specialist partners

Disciplined
investing
through RIT’s
diversified,
global portfolio

Capital growth

Superior risk/reward

6  Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model

This aspect of our model is key to our ability to identify 
and deliver value from differing sectors, markets and 
assets. And while access to such specialist managers 
involves paying fees, the level of these fees is an 
important and integral part of the investment decision.  
Our focus is solely on the net returns, and therefore 
if the returns, net of all fees, meet our target, we are 
comfortable paying them. Our reported net asset value is, 
of course, net of all management and performance fees.

Above all, our approach is long term. The permanent 
capital structure of an investment trust, compared to an 
open-ended fund, means we do not suffer from liquidity-
driven pressures to fund investors’ redemptions. We can 
therefore hold our investments in both public and private 
markets over an extended period and choose to realise 
them at the optimal time.

Another key facet of our investment approach is risk 
management. The Board establishes and oversees 
the risk appetite through regular monitoring of asset 
allocation and security limits. These are intended to allow 
JRCM to efficiently and effectively manage the portfolio in 
line with the Corporate Objective.

The Manager has developed a sophisticated risk 
management approach, on which it reports regularly to 
the Board. This incorporates quantitative and qualitative 
measures, as well as the careful use of hedging. The risk 
management tools assist in the construction of a portfolio 
designed to provide diversified sources of return and to 
monitor closely the performance of individual assets and 
the portfolio composition. Further information on risk 
management is set out on pages 24 to 30.

In summary, our flexible and distinctive model, with the 
freedom to utilise multiple asset classes and different 
investment structures, allows our Manager to deploy 
capital and manage risks as effectively as possible.

Further information in relation to the investment approach 
as well as portfolio attribution and returns is set out in the 
Manager’s Report on pages 11 to 20.

Business model, culture and values
RIT Capital Partners plc is a listed investment company, 
approved by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) as an 
investment trust. It is a UK Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) 
in accordance with UK legislation effective from 1 January 
2021 which replicated the European Union’s Alternative 
Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).

Investment management, as well as administration and 
company secretarial, is delegated under a formal agreement 
to our Manager, JRCM, a subsidiary of the Company. JRCM 
is separately regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority 
(FCA) as the UK Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) 
under the same UK rules. JRCM has a separate Board of 
Directors and is governed by its Executive Committee.

Board of
Directors

Alternative
Investment
Fund

RIT Capital Partners
plc

Investment management,
administration and company
secretarial

Executive
Committee

Alternative
Investment
Fund Manager

J. Rothschild Capital
Management Limited

In addition, the Manager is also responsible for our 
subsidiary, Spencer House Limited (SHL). This company 
provides premises management for Spencer House and 
our other investment properties in St. James’s. It also 
operates a profitable events business.

I am responsible for the leadership of the Board, which 
is ultimately tasked with ensuring that we both meet 
our Corporate Objective and maintain high standards of 
corporate governance.

The main focus of the Board is to ensure that the investment 
approach is suitable for achieving our Corporate Objective, and 
to monitor the performance of the Manager. In order to do this, 
we receive regular and detailed reports covering investment 
performance, risk, finance and operational matters.

The employees of our Manager and SHL are critical to 
our ability to meet all of our objectives. A key part of the 
monitoring of the Group is ensuring that the Manager is 
appropriately incentivised to deliver sustained, risk-adjusted 
returns and is able to attract, retain and develop a top-quality 
team. This team is expected to operate in accordance with 
our core values, and within a culture of high performance.

Our core values of respect, dignity and integrity are 
evidenced by the Group’s five business principles 
of collaboration, enterprise, efficiency, effective 
communication and professional ethics, which are 
regularly communicated and reinforced through the 
Group’s recruitment and appraisal processes. JRCM 
monitors the health of its culture by assessing regularly 
how well these principles are being applied, and the 
Board receives regular reports on this topic.

The Group has a clear and proactive approach to regular 
employee engagement. The Sustainability Report on 
pages 31 to 35 provides more detail of these interactions.

We are firm believers in the benefits that cognitive 
diversity as well as diversity more generally, brings to 
decision-making, and seek to ensure this is reflected in 
our recruitment processes, both at Board level and within 
our subsidiaries. At the year end the Board comprised 
eight Directors, of which four were men and four women. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  7

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model

Within our subsidiaries, the employee base comprised 43 
men and 19 women.

Corporate governance
The Directors are responsible for compliance with applicable 
rules, regulations and guidance in relation to governance, in 
particular taking into account the matters set out in Section 
172(1) of the Companies Act 2006, which guides our 
approach to strategy and decision making (see pages 33, 34 
and 62). The Board recognises that its actions have lasting 
impacts and consequences for the future of the Company, 
its shareholders and other stakeholders, and approaches its 
responsibilities accordingly.

The Board has a responsibility for ensuring that there 
are strong and healthy ties with all of our stakeholders, 
making sure that we consider their interests and 
acknowledge that the Group’s interaction with them is 
fundamental to the long-term success of the business.

The Directors receive regular feedback and reports from 
the Manager on its investor relations activity, as well 
as from brokers and analysts, and undertake their own 
shareholder interactions, to ensure that shareholders’ 
views are well understood by the Board.

When it comes to our Corporate Objective, shareholders 
understandably focus on our investment performance. 
This informs the Board’s desire to seek healthy, risk-
adjusted returns over the long term and through the 
cycles, with careful attention to capital preservation, and 
mindful of the Company’s reputation as a responsible 
fiduciary of shareholder capital. In assessing the right 
strategy to achieve these aims, the Board considers 
the ongoing suitability of the Investment Policy and the 
approach taken by the Manager to execute on the policy.

Other areas considered by the Board where shareholder 
views were taken into account included discount 
management, the dividend, buybacks, capital allocation, 
and ESG integration. Our current Board composition 
complies with the recommendations of both the 
Parker Review and the FTSE Woman Leaders Review 
(previously the Hampton-Alexander Review), and also 
meets the requirements of the FCA’s listing rules in 
relation to diversity. ESG and sustainability will continue 
to help inform our approach to this area. Please refer 
to our Sustainability Report on pages 31 to 35 for more 
information.

The Group has relationships with a number of suppliers 
and service providers which play an important role 
in enabling us to operate our business efficiently. 
The Groups’ overarching policy with respect to these 
relationships is that they should be managed so that 
they are both sustainable and mutually beneficial over 
the medium term, and deliver value for money for our 
shareholders (see page 34).

ESG and sustainability
We recognise that our purpose to protect and enhance 
our shareholders’ wealth must combine with a 
commitment to reflecting ESG factors in our investment 
approach. The application of an ESG lens offers us a 
comprehensive understanding of both financial and non-
financial risks, which ultimately contributes to improved 
decision-making. As a result, we have a more complete 
view of any given opportunity, supporting the delivery 
of risk-adjusted returns and aligning with shareholder 
expectations. ESG factors are integrated across our 
investment management and internal operations, and 
we aim to be good corporate citizens, applying robust 
governance and minimising our environmental impact.

8  Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model

Our Manager is a signatory of the UN PRI, and has in 
place a Responsible Investment Framework & Policy, 
which is disclosed to shareholders via the Company 
website. This policy ensures that ESG factors are firmly 
integrated across our investment management and 
internal operations. We believe that this policy aligns the 
Corporate Objective with a commitment to principles 
for responsible investment. ESG factors form part of the 
due diligence undertaken by JRCM prior to selecting 
investments and continue to be monitored throughout 
our holding of the investment. Further information is set 
out in our Sustainability Report on pages 31 to 35.

Measuring performance and KPIs
While we believe our success can only truly be assessed 
over the long term, we also recognise that providing 
shareholders with a comparator against which to 
measure our performance over shorter periods is helpful.

The strategic aims highlighted on this and earlier pages, 
reflect the desire to produce real capital growth with 
capital preservation and to exceed markets over time. 
These are reflected in the following targets or key 
performance indicators (KPIs):

1.  Absolute outperformance: NAV total return in excess of 

CPI plus 3.0% per annum;

2.  Relative outperformance: NAV total return in excess of 

the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI); and

3.  Share price total return or total shareholder return (TSR).

The first two of these relate to our Manager’s investment 
performance. CPI plus 3.0% per annum represents the 
desire to grow the real value of our portfolio over time, with 
a meaningful premium above inflation. The second reflects 
our unconstrained global investment approach and the 
desire to outperform markets over the long term. Consistent 
with many investment companies, we currently use the 
ACWI, which we believe is an appropriate comparator for 
our global, unconstrained approach although it does not 
drive our Manager’s portfolio construction. More specifically, 
we use a blended index consisting of 50% of the ACWI 
measured in sterling (and exposed to currency risk) and 
50% of the sterling-hedged ACWI.

While our Manager is tasked with managing the portfolio 
to deliver a NAV return, ultimately, the return to our 
shareholders is through share price growth and dividends. 
We therefore also consider the TSR as our third KPI.

Incentive structure
Our approach to remuneration incorporates the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy as well as specific structures within 
JRCM and SHL designed to attract, motivate and retain 

Our Corporate Objective...informs 

the Board’s desire to seek healthy, 

risk-adjusted returns over the long term 
and through the cycles... mindful of the 
Company’s reputation as a responsible 
fiduciary of shareholder capital.

the high-quality individuals we need to deliver our long-
term strategic aims and sustainable success.

The remuneration approach is designed to align with, 
and reinforce, these strategic aims. The Group operates 
an Annual Incentive Scheme (AIS) for employees as well 
as longer-term share-based awards. The cap for total 
payments under the AIS is 0.75% of net assets. This 
approach is designed to measure and reward the Group’s 
performance, and seek to provide an appropriate balance 
between shorter-term awards and longer-term incentives, 
as well as the need for robust risk management.

The AIS rewards investment outperformance as measured 
against two KPIs: CPI plus 3.0% and the ACWI. It also 
rewards wider achievements linked not to the NAV return, 
but to the Group’s business principles and culture. The 
scheme is measured annually and includes longer-term 
features such as a three-year absolute outperformance 
‘high water mark’ as well as significant deferral into the 
Company’s shares, which vest over three years.

The second component of the remuneration approach 
is a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) designed to reinforce 
the alignment with shareholders. Restricted share units 
(RSUs) may be awarded to employees of JRCM and SHL 
under the LTIP. RSUs vest after three years, with typically 
a further two-year holding period or lock-up before they 
can be sold.

All of the awards follow a careful appraisal of 
performance, and the high proportion of shares is 
designed to reinforce the alignment with our long-term 
investment performance and shareholder value creation. 
Further details of remuneration are provided in the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 56 to 59.

Shareholder communication and AGM
While this report forms a core part of the annual 
communication to shareholders, there are many 
additional ways to remain informed. Reflecting the nature 
of our portfolio, including the allocations to external 
managers (many of whom report monthly performance), 
we publish a monthly NAV as soon as reasonably 
practicable following the month end. Shareholders are 
encouraged to visit our website, www.ritcap.com, which 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  9

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model

provides regular updates of performance and exposure 
including our monthly factsheets. I look forward to 
meeting as many of you as possible at our AGM on 2 May 
2024. As normal, there will also be an opportunity on that 
occasion to hear directly from our Manager.

I would like to once again thank shareholders for their 
continuing loyalty and support over many years.

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton 
Chairman

10  Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Manager’s Report

Summary 
In the face of challenges posed by rising interest rates 
early in the year, geopolitical unrest, and bank collapses, 
major indices recorded robust gains in 2023. A substantial 
portion of these gains was attributable to a select 
few mega-cap technology companies, overshadowing 
more modest returns in other sectors. November 
and December saw substantial market returns, when 
indications by the US Federal Reserve of a path to lower 
rates, together with falling inflation over the course of the 
year, caused 10-year US treasury yields to tighten from 
4.9% to 3.9%. The majority of annual returns for indices 
globally came during this end of year rally, including our 
reference hurdle, ACWI (50% £). Our portfolio produced 
positive returns and trailed just behind this index for most 
of the year, but lagged strongly rising markets in the last 
two months of the year.

Despite the headwinds faced in 2022 and 2023, we 
remain confident in our long-term investment approach. 
Our careful portfolio construction is disciplined, 
diversified, and carefully risk managed such that, over 
time, we believe we can deliver capital appreciation to 
shareholders with attractive risk-reward characteristics. 

Portfolio positioning
Within a tried and tested investment risk framework, our 
investment “reach” is unconstrained. Having a flexible 
investment mandate enables us to invest across capital 
structures, asset classes and geographies. Nevertheless, 
our portfolio has historically maintained a core equity bias 
and will continue to do so.  

Group NAV £3,573m
(31 December 2022: £3,722m)

JRCM

Quoted equities,
£1,371m, 38.4% NAV
Private investments,
£1,285m, 35.9% NAV
Uncorrelated strategies,
£914m, 25.6% NAV
Other, £3m, 0.1% NAV

Decision-making starts with a considered, top-down 
macro-economic view. We allocate capital to take 
advantage of identified structural themes and market 
dislocations, drawing upon our seasoned internal 
resources and very often leveraging our extensive global 
network of managers and partners.

We structure our investment portfolio by allocating capital 
across three pillars: 

• 

• 

• 

quoted equities;

private investments; and

uncorrelated strategies. 

By design, each pillar serves a distinct purpose within 
the portfolio, with investments of differing profiles 
and return drivers allowing us to benefit from this 
broad diversification. Additionally, we make use of risk 
management tools and hedging strategies to manage 
risk, including currency translation risk.

Quoted equities
The quoted equities portfolio 
includes diversified, global high 
conviction strategies held directly 
through stocks, as well as long-
only funds, and equity hedge 
funds. We achieve this through a 
combination of our own in-house 
expertise and carefully selected 
external managers, capitalising on 
their specialist expertise in sectors 
and geographies where we see the 
most potential.

Private investments
Private investments comprise 
high quality investments, sourced 
directly via our own extensive 
global network and through 
commitments to exceptional fund 
managers in specialist strategies. 
Our direct investments are 
typically structured to provide 
some downside protection, with 
the potential to generate attractive 
returns over time.

Uncorrelated strategies
Our uncorrelated strategies aim to 
generate consistent returns with 
lower correlation to equity markets 
across the cycle. It includes, but 
is not limited to, absolute return, 
credit, real assets, government 
bonds and interest rate positions. 
For absolute return and credit 
strategies, we often collaborate 
with specialist external managers 
to access relevant opportunities.

30-60% NAV 

long-term allocation range

20-40% NAV 

long-term allocation range

20-40% NAV 

long-term allocation range

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  11

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
JRCM

Positive drivers of portfolio performance for the year 
were:

• 

• 

• 

high quality stock picking, driven by fundamentals;

 Japan exposure, which outperformed all other 
developed markets. This involved utilising our 
network and working closely with specialist 
managers who focus on value equities and engage 
directly with management teams of Japanese 
companies;

 the performance of our credit managers, who were 
able to profitably capitalise on dislocations in the 
market; 

Negative drivers were:

• 

• 

• 

• 

 moderate quoted equities exposure throughout the 
year, which meant that our portfolio as a whole, 
lagged behind the equity rally;

 our exposure to China, which has had a disappointing 
recovery following its post-Covid reopening. The lack 
of stimulus and global outflows weighed on shares 
here;

 currency translation effects from our meaningful US 
dollar position, as sterling continued to gain strength 
against the dollar; and

 a decline in the valuation of our private investments, 
mostly due to the funds, where the lagged Q4 2022 
valuations impacted our returns this year.

A more detailed analysis on the performance and 
positioning of each pillar, can be found in the following 
pages. 

Manager’s Report

Performance highlights
Our results for the year produced a NAV per share total 
return of 3.2%. Comparatively, our two reference hurdles, 
ACWI (50% £) and the ‘inflation plus’ hurdle CPI+3% 
returned 18.4% and 7.0%. 

Two noteworthy aspects underscored the strength 
observed in the market-capitalised weighted indices. 
First, the market rally exhibited an unusual narrowness, 
primarily propelled by a select group of stocks termed 
the ‘magnificent seven’ (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, 
Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla), which accounted 
for approximately 20% of the MSCI World index and 
demonstrated a remarkable 74% increase, while the 
remaining 1,473 stocks collectively experienced a more 
modest gain of 12%. Second, a substantial portion of 
returns across various asset classes materialised during 
the liquidity-fueled surge in November and December. For 
instance, the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond index posted  
-0.6% returns through October 31 and +9.9% over 
November and December. Similarly, the ACWI exhibited 
+7.0% returns through October 31, and then +10.6% 
over November and December. 

Asset allocation and portfolio contribution
Asset category
Quoted equities
Private investments
Uncorrelated strategies
Currency
Total investments
Liquidity, borrowings 
and other
Total

% NAV 
38.4%
35.9%
25.6%
0.9%
100.8%

-0.8%1
100.0%

% Contribution
6.8%
-2.7%
2.1%
-2.9%
3.3%

-0.1%1
3.2%

1 Including accretion benefit of 1.2% from share buybacks.

12 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Manager’s Report

Quoted equities 
31 December 2023: 38.4% NAV 
This pillar includes directly-held stocks, long-only funds, 
equity hedge funds and our quoted equity derivatives, 
used predominantly to manage exposures. We express 
our conviction views through our own stock picking and 
through allocation to exceptional managers where we can 
capitalise on their specialist expertise.

The average net quoted equities exposure (which 
incorporates notional exposure from derivatives) for 
the year was 39%, which is towards the lower end of 
the 10-year historical range. The low level reflects the 
defensive positioning of this book during the year, when 
we favoured an increased allocation to uncorrelated 
strategies, prioritising greater protection against market 
volatility. Towards the end of the year, we increased our 
net exposure to 45% as our stance on markets shifted. 

Our quoted equities portfolio generated local currency 
returns of 18.1% for the year and contributed 6.8% to the 
overall NAV, despite our minimal exposure to technology 
stocks in this pillar. This substantially outperformed the 
ACWI Equal Weighted Index, which grew only 9.4%, and 
was in line with our ACWI (50% £) reference hurdle of 
18.4% – despite the fact that we didn’t own meaningful 
positions in the ‘magnificent seven’ tech stocks, which 
had an outsized impact on equity markets in 2023. 

The key drivers of our performance were:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 investments in Japan, for example 3D Investment 
Partners, continued to perform well reflecting 
a mixture of corporate governance reforms and 
investor-led activism, helping to unlock value;

 healthcare stocks performed well as ‘big pharma’ 
deployed capital to acquire innovative biotech 
companies;

 good exposure to global value stocks, accessed via 
specialist managers, such as Discerene Group;

 astute stock selection, including investments 
focused on areas of mispricing such as Builders 
FirstSource and Talen Energy; and

 headwinds from fund investments with China 
exposure, as a result of a lacklustre post-Covid 
reopening, lack of stimulus, and global outflows.

With robust valuation levels prevailing in the market, 
alongside elevated real interest rates and nominal growth 
rates, we believe that engaging in bottom-up fundamental 
analysis can unveil appealing opportunities, especially in 
the context of market inefficiencies, or where investors 

JRCM

Quoted equities £1,371m
(31 December 2022: £1,307m)

Stocks, £472m, 13.2% NAV

Funds, £887m, 24.8% NAV

Other, £12m, 0.4% NAV

Note: Included in stocks is an adjustment of +£90.2m representing 
the  latest estimate of publicly-traded quoted equities held indirectly 
in private investment funds. An offsetting adjustment of -£90.2m is 
included in private funds.  

prioritised simpler narratives, such as money market 
funds in the US, which attracted $1.3 trillion of inflows, 
or mega-cap technology stocks. In the short to medium 
term, we see compelling opportunities in single stock 
investments and themes, where there is substantial 
long-term return potential coupled with a lower risk of 
permanent capital loss. 

One fertile area for exploring market inefficiencies 
is event-driven stocks, exemplified by our recent 
investment in Talen Energy, a US power utility company. 
We initiated this investment after the company emerged 
from bankruptcy in 2023, driven by our belief in the 
substantial unrecognised value of its nuclear power plant, 
conventional gas power plants, and datacentre assets, 
that together provide a significant margin of safety for our 
investment. The company is a major beneficiary of the 
US government’s decision to endorse the role of nuclear 
energy in supplying carbon-free baseload power. The US 
Inflation Reduction Act, enacted while Talen Energy was 
in bankruptcy, provides a floor to revenues for nuclear 
power plants, which means we have high conviction in 
the minimal downside risk for Talen Energy from our point 
of entry. Moreover, the management team is well aligned 
with shareholder interests in optimising the value of the 
investment.

Investing in companies with small and medium-sized 
market capitalisations is a segment of the market that 
has been overlooked by investors, creating substantial 
valuation inefficiencies. At the beginning of the year, 
we entered a position in Tempur Sealy, a prominent 
manufacturer, distributor, and retailer of mattresses, 
benefiting from the rising consumer demand for 
premium mattresses. We invested in this high-quality 
business at a valuation of less than 14 times earnings. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  13

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
JRCM

Elsewhere, a compelling opportunity for outperformance 
persists in Japan, where we maintain exposure through 
two specialist Japan value-oriented managers: Morant 
Wright Management and 3D Investment Partners. The 
combination of attractive valuations, improving corporate 
governance, a rise in activism, and secular changes such 
as labour and capital mobility provide a backdrop for 
compelling returns. 

Finally, in the healthcare sector, our positive long-term 
perspective remains grounded in ongoing innovation, 
scientific and technological breakthroughs, a generally 
favourable regulatory environment in the US, and the 
imperative for large pharmaceutical companies to 
offset substantial revenue losses resulting from patent 
cliffs through mergers and acquisitions with biotech 
firms. Recognising the specialised nature of the sector, 
which demands a blend of scientific expertise and 
commercial insight, the significance of having the right 
partners cannot be overstated. Consequently, we have 
strategically invested alongside best-in-class healthcare 
managers.

Manager’s Report

Tempur Sealy operates in a fragmented industry, where 
its market share is nearly twice the size of its closest 
competitor, and where it holds the majority of the profit 
pool. This dominant position allows the company to 
make aggressive investments in defending its barriers 
to entry, including scale, vertical integration, and brand 
recognition, facilitating growth beyond industry peers. 
Notably, its major competitor, Serta Simmons, underwent 
Chapter 11 restructuring in 2023, and a substantial portion 
of the industry is grappling with cash flow issues. The 
combination of these factors, along with robust cash 
flow generation and a management team aligned with 
shareholders, provides a solid margin of safety for our 
investment.

In short, the ‘value’ sector remains a fertile environment 
for stock picking. We express this perspective not 
only through individual stock positions but also via our 
partnership with Discerene Group. This fund emphasises 
businesses exhibiting strong defensive moats, robust 
cash flows, and attractive valuations. Notably, over the 
past two years, three of the fund’s top five positions have 
been subject to acquisition.

In terms of global exposure, despite recent challenges 
in Chinese public markets, we believe China remains 
a crucial market for capital deployment due to its 
status as the second-largest global economy, structural 
policy tailwinds (such as self-sufficiency initiatives) and 
historically low valuations. Given the cultural nuances 
and language barriers, we believe engaging a dedicated 
specialist manager is paramount. We have partnered 
with Springs Capital given their consistent generation 
of significant alpha over extended time periods and the 
quality of their investment team.

Quoted equity portfolio by region

US, 57%

Japan, 19%

Asia, 13%
Europe, 9%
Other, 2%

14 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Manager’s Report

Private investments 
31 December 2023: 35.9% NAV
Private investments remain a key element of our long-
term investment strategy and have been an important 
contributor to our track record of outperformance. 

The private investment portfolio represented 35.9% 
of NAV at year end, divided between 11.0% in direct 
investments, including co-investments alongside specialist 
partners, and 24.9% in third-party funds. This is in line 
with our strategy to allocate capital to this asset class 
both through fund managers with specialist expertise 
and outstanding track records, as well as directly, often in 
co-investment structures. Our relationships with top-tier 
partners worldwide, developed over many years, have 
been crucial for generating significant returns over the long 
term. The direct private investments made in the last 10 
years have delivered a compound return of approximately 
29% per annum, representing an exceptionally strong 
return on our capital.

In 2023 the private investments book declined by  
-6.0% and detracted  -2.7% to the overall NAV. Private 
investments are by their nature, long term and if we look 
over the last five years, this book has seen a cumulative 
145.7% return and a 28.8% contribution to NAV. 

Private direct

Private funds
Total

Dec 2023  
% NAV

 2023 %  
return

2023  
contribution

11.0%
24.9%
35.9%

-3.8%
-7.0%
-6.0%

-0.5%
-2.2%
-2.7%

Note: returns are in local currency.

Key positive contributors to 2023 performance included:

• 

• 

 strong revenue growth in many direct holdings, 
as well as underlying holdings in funds, and a 
continuation of a focus on profitability; and

 upward multiple re-rating of the listed technology 
sector, driving some valuation uplifts of private 
companies.

These were offset by:

• 

• 

 challenges in certain private investments, including 
those exposed to reductions in discretionary 
spending and investment by small-and-medium sized 
businesses; and

 the volatile macro landscape, which discouraged 
further listings, impacted a traditional route to 
valuation uplift and liquidity for private investors.

Private investments NAV bridge

JRCM

Private investments £1,285m
(31 December 2022: £1,516m)

Direct, £392m, 11.0% NAV

Funds, £893m, 24.9% NAV

Note: Included in the funds number is an adjustment of -£90.2m 
representing the publicly-traded quoted equities held indirectly in 
private investment funds.  

During 2023, in the same way that public market issuance 
was inconsistent, private financings and transactions 
were also subdued. We sold one investment (Infinity) and 
the majority of two other positions (Paxos and Animoca), 
all at or above their most recent valuations. Despite these 
broader market challenges, there were a number of very 
positive developments in our direct private investments 
as a result of strong operational performance and the 
investment structure of the existing portfolio.

One company we are optimistic about is Scale AI, which 
specialises in labelling objects in photos and videos 
serving the requirements of self-driving cars, virtual/
augmented reality, and U.S. Department of Defense 
applications. It has expanded its product offerings to 
assist in teaching computers how to generate content 
using AI. This company is a good example of the type 
of “picks-and-shovels” opportunities RIT pursues; 
companies which are positioned to thrive as a result of 
a broader trend rather than a particular outcome. We 
believe that Scale AI is well-placed to benefit from AI 
breakthroughs without the necessity of committing to a 
specific foundational model, whether from OpenAI, Meta 
or Google. 

RIT also holds a stake in Epic Systems, a leading U.S. 
electronic health records provider founded by Judith 
Faulkner in 1979 with $70k of investment, and which 
delivered $4.6 billion of revenue in its recent reporting. 
In 2023, management continued to invest in Epic’s cloud 
products, which are seeing strong traction – investments 
which we believe hold the promise to compound 
shareholders capital at attractive rates over the long term, 
as Judith has achieved since the company’s founding.

£ million

Private direct

Private funds
Total

Dec 2022

442.7
1,073.1
1,515.8

 Additions/ 
(disposals) 

 Value change 

Currency 
translation

Quoted equity 
adjustment

-12.5
39.0
26.5

-16.4
-75.3
-91.7

-22.1
-53.8
-75.9

–-
-90.2
-90.2

Dec 2023

391.7
892.8
1,284.5

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  15

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
JRCM

card spending in a higher interest rate environment. Only 
founded in 2015, the bank grew total customers by 28% 
and now serves 7.4 million, or more than 10% of the 
UK population. Having proven its customer model, and 
continuing to attract new customers to its digital-first 
offering, we believe Monzo can take a substantial share 
of the UK retail banking profit pool. 

If we look at the returns from the private funds, new 
commitments made in the last 10 years have delivered 
a compound return of approximately 18% per annum, 
representing a very strong return and a healthy profit 
over our capital deployed. As of the reporting date, 99% 
of our private fund positions were held at September 
valuations. This is consistent with the industry, which as 
standard reports on a quarter’s lag. The impact of updated 
valuations on NAV are published on a monthly basis. 

We expect to see the weighting of private investments 
reduce as the IPO market reopens and our private 
funds continue to make distributions. In the meantime, 
we continue to take an active approach to portfolio 
management, realising value where opportunities 
arise. In February 2024, for example, we received final 
distributions from the earlier sale of our holding in Infinity, 
a UK data-centre operator, at a price above our December 
carrying value and have other potential realisations in 
progress.

As we have observed throughout RIT’s history, private 
investments appreciate idiosyncratically and show little 
correlation to calendar year market moves. However, they 
are a substantial contributor to our returns over the long 
term. In total, new direct private investments and fund 
commitments made in the last 10 years, have delivered a 
compound return of approximately 20% per annum due 
to this strategy – compared to 9.5% for our MSCI ACWI 
hurdle and 12% for the S&P 500.

We hold a deep belief in many of the internet-enabled 
technology businesses we hold directly and indirectly. 
In line with our patient approach and permanent capital 
vehicle, we believe that over the long term, these 
opportunities are best accessed through our private 
investments and although IPO markets and valuations 
remain challenging in the near term, these businesses 
should be beneficiaries of what we expect to be 
improving market conditions. Historically our realised 
investments have been sold at an average 24% increase 
from their most recent holding values as determined by 
RIT’s independent Valuation Committee.

Manager’s Report

The current weighting of private investments remains 
relatively high in comparison to historical levels. This is 
primarily a result of performance driving growth within 
the portfolio and the relatively inactive IPO market. 
Companies like Motive and Brex, for example, have 
become significant holdings in the portfolio because their 
current valuations are several times higher than RIT’s 
initial investment in them. 

In the longer list of smaller private direct investments, 
there are numerous examples of high potential companies 
that have shown early promise which could have 
meaningful NAV contribution in the months and years 
ahead. Examples of this diversified group of early-stage 
investments include: Relativity Space, a next-generation 
rocket company relying on market-leading 3D-printing 
technology to compete in the lucrative launch market; 
Digits, an accounting and financial reporting solution 
disrupting an industry reliant on 20th century software; 
and Perfect Day, a company innovating in the global dairy 
industry with precision fermentation to produce animal-
free milk proteins. 

RIT is a sought-after investment partner for the most 
attractive private investments worldwide. This means 
that not only can we access opportunities otherwise 
inaccessible; it also means that we can structure deals on 
attractive terms with a measure of downside protection. 
The majority by value of our underlying direct private 
investments benefit from some form of structural 
protection for our capital. This can be in the form of 
capped downside, or in preference ranking to ordinary 
shareholders while also retaining equity upside. For 
example, our investment in Motive, made alongside our 
investment partner Greenoaks, benefits from uncapped 
upside as well as a set of protections similar to those we 
secured for RIT shareholders in our Coupang investment.

While the private funds 2023 performance was impacted 
by the receipt of lagged Q4 2022 valuations, we also saw 
positives across the book. We believe the private funds 
portfolio, which includes a number of the best performing 
private investment fund vehicles worldwide, is well 
positioned to benefit when the window for technology 
IPOs returns. Through our private funds investments we 
have meaningful exposure to many of the most promising 
later-stage private technology businesses globally; 
companies such as ServiceTitan, Stripe, Databricks, and 
Rippling. 

Monzo, one such larger indirect position closer to 
home, saw net operating income grow 88% in its 2023 
financials, driven by increased customer deposits and 

16 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Manager’s Report

Uncorrelated strategies
31 December 2023: 25.6% NAV
Our uncorrelated strategies pillar contains a mix of 
strategies with a lower correlation to equity markets that 
aim to generate consistent returns across the economic 
cycle. The uncorrelated strategies book returned 6.8% 
and contributed 2.1% to the overall NAV. 

In this pillar, we aim for a diverse mix of investments, 
incorporating credit, ‘market neutral’ and macro 
strategies. Additionally, we include investments in 
interest rates, government bonds and real assets, such as 
investment properties and gold. This diversified approach 
serves to protect the overall portfolio from volatility, acting 
as a crucial driver of returns during periods of market 
stress. For absolute return and credit strategies, we often 
work with specialist external managers to access the 
opportunities.  

Key drivers of this performance were: 

• 

• 

 strong performance of our credit funds, utilising our 
strong network of specialist external managers;

 positive contributions from gold, as market volatility 
favoured safe-haven assets; and 

• 

 our new investment in carbon credits.

Absolute return & credit strategies
In terms of credit strategies, market volatility has 
increased materially due to sharply higher interest rates, 
retrenchment of banks from lending beyond their core 
client base, and large volumes of debt which are maturing 
over the coming years. Opportunities in this market exist 
in all major regions, particularly Europe and the US. When 
borrowing becomes more expensive, due to a rapid 
increase in credit spreads, markets can undergo a broad 
sell-off. This presents opportunities for experienced credit 
investors to source investments with strong risk-adjusted 
return potential given the levels of asset coverage and 
security available to lenders.

In 2023, credit markets saw significant volatility, with 
spreads widening into the US banking crisis in March, 
then tightening into the summer given the liquidity 
injections by the Federal Reserve. The roller coaster 
continued with a widening into late-summer alongside 
the narrative of ‘higher-for-longer’ rates, before materially 
tightening in November and December as the narrative 
of ‘peak’ rates and hopes of future central bank rate cuts 
took hold. 

JRCM

Uncorrelated strategies £914m
(31 December 2022: £812m)

Absolute return & credit,
£740m, 20.7% NAV

Government bonds & rates,
£114m, 3.2% NAV

Real assets, £60m, 1.7% NAV

Through close partnerships, we have taken advantage 
of this pattern of volatility to build our core exposure 
using idiosyncratic opportunities. We have privileged 
access to specialists who have expertise in specific sub-
categories of credit markets. During the year, we added 
to existing managers in European and emerging market 
credit, such as Tresidor Investment Management and 
ARCM, as attractive risk-reward asymmetry was present 
in these markets. Our credit funds as a group delivered 
double digit returns for the year. As a result, credit 
strategies drove the majority of the contribution under the 
uncorrelated strategies pillar.

Our macro managers focus on absolute return. These 
managers had a challenging first half of the year with 
most central banks moving in sync on the fight against 
inflation. A more varied monetary policy in the second 
half of the year provided more opportunities for our 
managers, who as a group finished in positive territory 
and returned mid-single-digits for the year. 

Looking to take advantage of the resurgence of inflation, 
and the significant alpha-generating opportunities it 
presented, we invested with an experienced inflation 
manager with over two decades of expertise and a 
remarkable track record. This partnership enables us 
to gain unique insights into emerging trends and the 
repercussions for a broader range of assets, positioning 
us to navigate and capitalise on the dynamic financial 
landscape around inflation.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  17

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
JRCM

Uncorrelated strategies

Dec 2023  
% NAV

 2023 %  
return

2023  
contribution

Absolute return & 
credit
Government 
bonds and rates
Real assets
Total

20.7%

9.2%

2.0%

3.2%
1.7%
25.6%

3.9%
-0.1%
6.8%

0.1%
-0.0%
2.1%

Note: returns are in local currency

Manager’s Report

Our equity market neutral managers also focus on 
absolute return. They seek to protect against market 
exposure risks by taking long and short positions in 
related but different securities, in order to extract the 
idiosyncratic return component of a stock’s share price 
change. This strategy enables the manager to generate 
consistent absolute returns with low correlation to equity 
markets and limited risk of loss. During the year, we 
made a new investment in Ilex Capital, an equity market 
neutral manager who we believe to be of similar calibre 
to our existing manager, Woodline, albeit complementary 
with different focus markets. The launch was highly 
sought after and we were able to secure an allocation 
through our network and reputation.

Government bonds and rates
2023 has been another tough year for government 
bonds, especially for UK gilts. Stickier inflation in the UK 
compared to other developed countries in the first half 
of the year, pushed short-dated gilt yields to their highest 
level in 15 years. We purchased longer-dated gilts in the 
first half when yields were attractive and, thereafter, 
benefitted from core inflation’s sharp decline in October.

Real assets
This category holds our property investments as well 
as positions in commodities.  The former were down 
slightly as real estate values softened over the year.  
Within commodities, we held some hedges as well as 
gold. Gold futures hit a record high of $2,135 per ounce 
in December after another volatile year. Our position 
in gold, held through derivatives, contributed 0.4% to 
NAV as gold performed strongly during this period. This 
was driven by geopolitical tensions and central bank 
purchases, as well as a decline in real yields in the second 
half of the year. Gold continues to play an important role 
in our portfolio, serving as an asymmetric hedge to a 
central bank ‘pivot’, a reversal of the strong US dollar, or 
more generally against the increasing possibility of broad-
based market dislocation.

18 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Manager’s Report

Currency
Currency is an important part of our portfolio construction 
as an asset class and to manage risk. Given the global 
nature of our portfolio, we use currency hedging to 
reduce currency translation risk, typically by increasing 
our levels of sterling to hedge our significant US Dollar 
denominated investment book. We use hedges to limit 
potential downside and to protect unrealised gains made 
on profitable investments. The use of derivatives also 
allows us to enhance returns through efficient structuring. 
We also invest in currencies from time-to-time through 
the use of currency derivatives. Our approach to 
managing currency exposures can have a meaningful 
impact on our overall performance.

Given sterling was the best performing currency in the 
G7, having appreciated by 5.4% against the US dollar in 
2023 and 19.1% since its historical lows in September 
2022, our diversified global portfolio was impacted by 
foreign currency translation. Our active hedging efforts 
softened the impact of currency fluctuations, but 
sterling’s strength was the largest detractor from our 
absolute performance this year, detracting 2.9% from 
NAV. We will continue to closely monitor and actively 
manage our currency exposures. 

30%

Currency exposure (% of NAV)

Sterling

US dollar

Euro

Japanese yen

Other

6.5%

6.4%

4.8%

4.4%

8.1%

11.7%

47.9%

53.0%

32.7%

24.5%

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Note: The chart excludes exposure from currency options. Where 
available, the exposures in this chart are estimated by  
considering the underlying currency exposure of third-party funds 
rather than by the fund’s currency of denomination.

JRCM

Buybacks
Our conviction in the RIT portfolio remains high, and 
as such, we have continued to execute on the Board’s 
policy to buyback shares at a significant discount to the 
underlying net asset value. This has been accretive for 
shareholders, and added an estimated 1.2% to the NAV 
per share return.

Debt and leverage
Maintaining a healthy balance sheet and ensuring we have 
appropriate liquidity and access to leverage to enhance 
shareholder returns is a core priority. During the year, we 
paid back our £150 million facility with Commonwealth 
Bank of Australia (CBA), reducing our debt in an 
environment of higher interest rates. At the year end, we 
held £281 million in drawn facilities and loan notes, with 
£40 million in committed but undrawn facilities – more 
information on our borrowings can be found on pages 88 
and 89. Taking into consideration our cash balances, this 
represented gearing of 3.5% calculated using guidance 
from the Association of Investment Companies (AIC). 

Operations and costs
JRCM manages the Group on a day-to-day basis on 
behalf of the Board, providing investment management, 
administration and company secretarial services. The 
Manager is also responsible for our subsidiary, Spencer 
House Limited (SHL) which maintains and manages the 
investment property portfolio, including Spencer House 
and other properties in St. James’s, and also operates a 
profitable events business.

Careful management of costs is an ongoing priority for 
our business. Where we can identify savings, without 
impacting the ability to generate investment returns or 
ensuring compliance with regulations, we will do so. 
During 2023, we invested in building our marketing and 
investor relations capabilities, conscious of the desire 
from shareholders for greater disclosures and more 
regular updates.  

In order to provide investors with information on the 
costs of RIT’s own investment business, we calculate an 
ongoing charges figure (OCF) based on recommendations 
from the AIC. The OCF assumes a static portfolio, with 
therefore no transaction costs or direct performance-
related compensation. It also excludes the costs of 
borrowings deployed to enhance returns. For 2023, RIT’s 
own OCF was 0.77% (2022: 0.89%); the reduction over 
the year reflects lower costs, as well as a reclassification 
of performance-linked LTIP costs in line with the AIC 
guidance. Further information on the calculation is 
provided on page 107.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  19

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
JRCM

directly own, with this proportion of the portfolio set to 
increase. At the same time, we continue to be excited 
by themes such as healthcare and Japan, where our 
network of specialist external managers means we are 
well-positioned to identify and take advantage of these 
opportunities.

In uncorrelated strategies, we are enthusiastic about 
current opportunities in the corporate credit markets, 
driven by factors such as the increase in interest rates, 
reluctance by traditional banks to lend to mid-sized 
businesses, and the maturing of around $0.6 trillion 
in loans over the next two years, which were issued 
at lower rates. Where there is a dislocation in credit 
markets, our partnerships with specialist managers 
provides us with the potential to generate returns of 
mid-teens or greater, in quality credits, with limited risk to 
our capital due to robust creditor protections. And, even 
where there isn’t a dislocation, the managers can still 
earn high single digit to low double digit returns on quality 
credits. 

The positive drivers of our portfolio’s performance in 
2023, including high-quality stock picking, strategic 
geographic exposure, and the agility of our credit 
managers, is illustrative of how our portfolio can perform. 
Whatever the market challenges, our proactive approach 
to navigate these complexities sets the stage for 
continued thoughtful and resilient portfolio management 
in the coming period. 

Although the percentage allocation across our three 
pillars may see modest variations over shorter periods 
of time, our portfolio construction and risk management 
principles aim to provide shareholders with a diversified 
portfolio that delivers long-term capital appreciation on an 
attractive risk-adjusted basis.

To conclude, we believe RIT’s competitive edge is derived 
from our in-house expertise, our capital structure – 
enabling a nimble and flexible investment approach – as 
well as our unique access and ability to foster deep, 
long-term specialist partnerships. As the market enters a 
more idiosyncratic phase, we recognise that careful stock 
picking and asset selection exercised within our robust 
risk management framework, will be key to delivering 
performance.

J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited

Manager’s Report

In addition to our Group costs, RIT’s Investment Policy 
includes the allocation of part of the portfolio to third-
party managers, which have their own fees. These include 
long-only equity and hedge fund managers, private equity 
and funds that sit within our uncorrelated strategies pillar. 
We estimate that the average annual management fees 
for external managers represent an additional 0.94% 
of average net assets (2022: 0.88%). This excludes 
performance fees/carried interest which are typically 
paid for outperformance against an index or an absolute 
hurdle, and deducted from the valuations we receive. 
Further information on fees is provided on page 61.

The managers’ fee structure is always a key consideration 
in our due diligence. They are necessary costs in investing 
in many difficult to access, high-quality managers or 
unique deals, and are only paid for good performance. The 
final investment decision is always made on the basis of 
expected returns, net of all fees. 

Outlook 
In 2024, we are navigating a landscape characterised by 
a balance of conflicting macro indicators. While US GDP 
estimates are trending upward, certain credit indicators 
are exhibiting signs of decline. Significant geopolitical 
risks, such as conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, 
coupled with the potential repercussions of the USA 
elections in November, cast a shadow over the horizon. 
The market’s late upturn in 2023 was driven by the 
perception that interest rates may have reached their 
peak, and that a soft landing is becoming more probable. 
This has led to a scenario where many assets are 
perceived to be fully valued. 

The above notwithstanding, we believe there are 
individual assets that currently trade at appealing price 
points, and therefore provide attractive opportunities 
for capital deployment. As investors who integrate a 
top-down and bottom-up approach, we would highlight 
the confidence we have in our own investment portfolio. 
Within our private investments book, we see some 
strong underlying operating performance, a shift towards 
prioritising profit over pure growth, and broader tailwinds 
driven by digital transition. These factors underpin our 
confidence in the long-term intrinsic value of our private 
investments. The reopening of the IPO markets may 
also serve as a near-term catalyst for validating their 
valuations.

We are also excited about quoted equities, where the 
environment is particularly conducive for bottom-up, 
fundamental stock picking. We think there are a multitude 
of areas to deploy long-term capital with attractive return 
potential in areas such as the often overlooked small 
to medium-capitalisation stocks, or in ‘event-driven’ 
stocks. As such, we will lean more into stocks that we 

20 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Investment Portfolio

Investment portfolio as at 31 December 2023

Country/region

Industry/description

Value of 
investments  
£ million

% of 
NAV

Investment holdings
Quoted equities1, 2
Stocks:
Talen Energy
Mastercard
Intercontinental Exchange
Canadian Pacific Kansas City
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Tempur Sealy
Helios Towers
Vistry

Power utility
United States
Software & services
United States
Diversified financial services
United States
Rail transportation
Canada
Life science tools & services
United States
Home furnishings; 1.2% notional
United States
Africa
Telecommunication services
United Kingdom Homebuilding; 1.0% notional

Consumer staples
Retailing
Energy
Building products; 1.0% notional
Homebuilding; 1.3% notional
Consumer staples; 1.1% notional
Software & services; 0.6% notional
–

All‐cap, diversified
All‐cap, healthcare

All‐cap, value bias
All‐cap, diversified
Small/mid‐cap, value bias
All‐cap, diversified
Small/mid‐cap, diversified
Mid/large‐cap, healthcare
–

Switzerland
South Korea
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
–

Barry Callebaut
Coupang
Golar LNG
Builders FirstSource
Lennar
Keurig Dr Pepper
Visa
Other direct stocks
Quoted stocks held within private investment funds2
Total stocks
Funds:
3D Opportunity
HCIF Offshore

Japan
United States

Global

Global
Japan
China
Asia
Global
–

Discerene

Blackrock Strategic Equity
Morant Wright
Springs Opportunities
Ward Ferry Asian Smaller Co.’s
DG Offshore
Other funds
Total funds
Other:

S&P call options
Diversified basket
Other
Total other
Total quoted equities

United States
Global
–

Diversified; 4.5% notional
Long; 0.9% notional
–

48.8
45.1
39.6
35.7
30.2
26.4
25.6
22.3

21.8
21.5
19.5
7.0
6.8
1.3
0.1
29.9
90.2
471.8

182.2
156.8

112.3
112.3
100.2
70.7
64.3
17.9
70.5
887.2

9.6
1.1
1.2
11.9
1,370.9

1.4%
1.3%
1.1%
1.0%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%

0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.2%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.5%
13.2%

5.1%
4.4%

3.1%
3.1%
2.8%
2.0%
1.8%
0.5%
2.0%
24.8%

0.3%
0.0%
0.1%
0.4%
38.4%

1   The quoted equity category includes stocks (held directly and via co‐investment vehicles), funds and derivatives. As a result, the liquidity of the 
individual positions may be influenced by market volumes as well as the redemption terms of the specific funds or co‐investment vehicles. 
Where positions are held, or partially held, via total return swaps or options, the total delta‐adjusted notional exposure is also disclosed in the 
table. 

2   Adjustment made for the latest estimate of publicly‐traded quoted equities held indirectly in private investment funds. These positions are 

valued based on their most recent traded price at the statement date of the fund in which they are held. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  21

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Country/region

Industry/description

Value of
investments
£ million

% of 
NAV

Investment Portfolio

Investment holdings
Private investments
Private investments – direct3:
Motive
Webull
Epic Systems
Kraken

Lede
Blueground
Infinity4
Airtable
Brex
Age of Learning
Anchorage Digital
Bolt Financial
Scale AI
Paxos
Puck
Everest
Xapo
Dandy
Other private investments – direct
Total private investments – direct
Private investments – funds:
Thrive funds
Iconiq funds
BDT Capital funds
Greenoaks Capital funds
Ribbit Capital funds
Hillhouse funds
Arch Venture funds
Lindenwood
LCV funds
Biomatics funds
Westcap funds
Sound Ventures funds
Eight Partners funds
Firstminute Capital funds
Mithril funds
LionTree Investment fund
Expa Capital
K2 funds
Corsair funds
Blackstone Tactical Opps
Other private investments – funds
Quoted stocks held within private investment funds5
Total private investments – funds
Total private investments

United States
United States
United States

Cargo ground transportation
Investment banking & brokerage
Health care technology

Diversified financial services
United States
Media & entertainment
United States
Real estate operating company
United States
United Kingdom Real estate operating company
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
Global
Global
United States
–

Software & services
Diversified financial services
Education services
Software & services
Software & services
Application software
Software & services
Publishing
Software & services
Diversified financial services
Health care technology
–

Growth equity
United States
Growth equity
United States
Private equity
United States
Growth equity
United States
Growth equity
United States
Private equity
China
Life sciences
United States
Growth equity
United States
Early stage
United States
Life sciences
United States
Growth equity
United States
United States
Early stage
United Kingdom Early stage
Early stage
United States
Growth equity
United States
Private equity
United States
Early stage
United States
Early stage
China
Private equity
United States
Private equity
United States
–
–

78.0
50.8
23.4

17.9
17.6
14.7
13.3
12.8
12.3
10.4
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.5
7.1
6.7
6.7
6.0
83.1
391.7

147.2
121.6
85.4
77.1
72.1
55.8
45.7
29.2
26.6
17.8
16.4
14.9
14.3
13.9
13.3
13.2
11.8
8.8
8.7
8.6
180.6
(90.2)
892.8
1,284.5

2.2%
1.4%
0.7%

0.5%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
2.3%
11.0%

4.1%
3.4%
2.4%
2.2%
2.0%
1.6%
1.3%
0.8%
0.7%
0.5%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
5.0%
(2.5)%

24.9%
35.9%

3   The private direct book includes investments held through co‐investment vehicles managed by a general partner (GP).
4   Balance represents the estimated cash proceeds from the business sale post liquidation of the holding company.
5   Adjustment made for the latest estimate of publicly‐traded quoted equities held indirectly in private investment funds. These positions are 

valued based on their most recent traded price at the statement date of the fund in which they are held.

22 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Country/region

Industry/description

Value of
investments
£ million

% of 
NAV

Investment Portfolio

Investment holdings
Uncorrelated strategies
Absolute return and credit funds:
Tresidor funds
Attestor Value
ARCM
RIT US Value Partnership

Caxton
Woodline
JJJ Feeder
Liontree Advisory 
ILEX
Highbridge
Charter Oak
Other absolute return and credit funds
Total absolute return and credit funds
Real assets:
St. James’s properties
Spencer House
Gold futures
Oil futures
Other real assets
Total real assets
Government bonds and rates:
UK treasury gilts 2027 and 2033
Total government bonds and rates
Total uncorrelated strategies

Currency
Currency forward contracts
Currency options
Total currency

Global
Global
Asia

Global
Global
Global
Global
United States
Europe
Global
United States
–

Credit and special situations
Credit and special situations
Credit and special situations

Multi‐strategy
Macro‐strategy
Equity market neutral
Macro‐strategy
Corporate loan note
Equity market neutral
Multi‐strategy
Credit and special situations
–

United Kingdom Investment property
United Kingdom Investment property
Long; 4.2% notional
Global
Long; 1.5% notional
Global
–
–

United Kingdom Government bonds

Various
Various

–
–

Total investments
Liquidity, borrowings and other
Liquidity:
Liquidity6
Total liquidity
Borrowings:
Short‐term bank borrowings7
RIT senior loan notes
Total borrowings
Other assets/(liabilities):
Margin
Trades awaiting settlement
Other assets/(liabilities)
Total other assets/(liabilities)
Total liquidity, borrowings and other

Total net asset value

–

–
–

–
–
–

Cash at bank

Revolving credit facilities
Fixed interest loan notes

–
–
–

130.8
97.5
96.9

77.8
68.5
58.5
44.4
37.0
32.8
30.1
26.7
38.8
739.8

3.7%
2.7%
2.7%

2.2%
1.9%
1.6%
1.2%
1.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.7%
1.3%
20.7%

26.5
26.3
4.0
(1.8)
4.9
59.9

0.7%
0.7%
0.1%
(0.1)%
0.3%
1.7%

114.4
114.4
914.1

3.2%
3.2%
25.6%

26.8
5.0
31.8

0.8%
0.1%
0.9%

3,601.3 100.8%

202.0
202.0

5.7%
5.7%

(142.9)
(137.9)
(280.8)

37.8
25.3
(12.3)
50.8
(28.0)

(4.0)%
(3.9)%
(7.9)%

1.1%
0.7%
(0.4)%
1.4%
(0.8)%

3,573.3 100.0%

6   The liquidity balance excludes £2.3 million of cash held within segregated accounts managed externally.
7  The Group has two revolving credit facilities with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and BNP Paribas SA.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  23

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
it is important to recognise that a carefully designed risk 
management and internal control system can only aim to 
reduce the probability or mitigate the impact; it cannot 
remove the risk. With a global investment portfolio having 
meaningful exposure to equities, rather than a pure 
absolute return mandate, RIT’s NAV will not be immune 
to either falling markets and/or volatility in currency 
markets. Equally, with a diversified set of individual and 
typically uncorrelated, high return-seeking drivers, the 
portfolio could encounter occasions when the level of 
volatility results in negative alpha in the short term. 

As a permanent capital vehicle, and unlike open-ended 
funds, we do not need to manage the portfolio to 
meet redemptions. With sizeable assets relative to our 
modest borrowings and ongoing liabilities, as confirmed 
later in this section, we do not consider the Company’s 
viability or going concern to represent principal risks. 
Nevertheless, and in particular at times of market stress, 
the Manager utilises a detailed, day-to-day liquidity risk 
management framework to help effectively manage the 
balance sheet, including careful monitoring of the banking 
covenants.

Operational and other risks include those related to the 
legal environment, regulation, taxation, cyber security, 
climate and other areas where internal or external factors 
could result in financial or reputational loss. These are 
also managed by JRCM with regular reporting to, and 
review by, the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board.

Principal Risks and Viability

Risk management and internal control
The principal risks facing RIT are both financial and 
operational. The ongoing process for identifying, 
evaluating and managing these risks, as well as any 
emerging risks, is the responsibility of the Board and the 
Audit and Risk Committee. 

The Board sets the portfolio risk parameters within 
which JRCM operates. This involves an assessment 
of the nature and level of risk within the portfolio 
using qualitative and quantitative methods. Additional 
information in relation to the quantum and associated 
sensitivity of market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk 
in accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: 
Disclosures is shown in Note 13 on pages 78 to 87.

The Board is ultimately responsible for the Group’s 
system of internal controls, and has delegated the 
supervision of the internal control system to the Audit 
and Risk Committee. Such systems are designed to 
manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to 
achieve business objectives and, as such, can provide 
only reasonable and not absolute assurance against 
any material misstatement or loss. Further information 
is provided in the Audit and Risk Committee Report on 
pages 52 to 55.

As an investment company, RIT is exposed to financial 
risks inherent in its portfolio, which are primarily market-
related and common to any portfolio with significant 
exposure to equities and other financial assets. The 
ongoing portfolio and risk management includes an 
assessment of the macroeconomic and geopolitical 
factors that can influence market risk, as well as 
consideration of investment-specific risk factors.

Your Company’s broad and flexible investment mandate 
allows the Manager to take a relatively unconstrained 
approach to asset allocation and utilise whatever action is 
considered appropriate in mitigating any attendant risks 
to the portfolio.

With a high degree of volatility in markets and continued 
geopolitical tensions, risk management remains critical. 
The portfolio risk management approach undertaken by 
the Manager, and considered regularly by the Board, is 
designed to produce a healthy risk-adjusted return over 
the long term, through careful portfolio construction, 
security selection and the considered use of hedging.

As an investment business, the vast majority of 
the day-to-day activities involve the measurement, 
evaluation and management of risk and reward. With 
a corporate objective which includes an element of 
capital preservation, the culture and practice of seeking 
to protect the NAV from undue participation in down 
markets through the cycles is well established. However, 

24 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Principal Risks and Viability

Principal risks
The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the Company, with input 
from the Audit and Risk Committee, as well as the Manager. Following this assessment, the Board has concluded that 
there are no material emerging risks, and it is appropriate to reclassify two risks as separate principal risks. The material 
widening of the discount at which the shares trade relative to the NAV, has led us to establish a new principal risk – 
Discount risk. In addition, the ongoing developments in cyber risk, coupled with the potential that AI could enhance 
fraud attempts, means we have also reclassified Cyber security as a new principal risk. The resulting principal risks are 
as described below:

Risk

Mitigation 

Investment strategy risk 
As an investment company, a key risk is that the investment 
strategy, guided by the Investment Policy: 

“To invest in a widely diversified, international portfolio 
across a range of asset classes, both quoted and unquoted; 
to allocate part of the portfolio to exceptional managers in 
order to ensure access to the best external talent available.”

Does not deliver the Corporate Objective:

The Board is responsible for monitoring the investment 
strategy to ensure it is consistent with the Investment 
Policy and appropriate to meet the Corporate Objective. 
The Directors receive a detailed monthly report from the 
Manager to enable them to monitor investment performance, 
attribution, and exposure. They also receive a comprehensive 
investment report from the JRCM CIO in advance of the 
quarterly Board meetings.

“To deliver long-term capital growth, while preserving 
shareholders’ capital; to invest without the constraints of a 
formal benchmark, but to deliver for shareholders increases 
in capital value in excess of the relevant indices over time.”

The overall risk appetite is set by the Board, with portfolio 
risk managed by JRCM within prescribed limits. This involves 
careful assessment of the nature and level of risk within the 
portfolio using qualitative and quantitative methods. 

Discount risk 
Investment trust shares trade at a price which can be at 
a discount or premium relative to their net asset value. If 
trading at a discount, there is a risk that a widening of the 
discount may result in shareholders achieving a return which 
does not reflect the underlying investment performance of 
the Company.

The JRCM Investment Committee meets regularly to review 
overall investment performance, portfolio exposure and 
significant new investments.

To manage this risk, and to reduce the volatility for 
shareholders, the Board monitors the level of discount/
premium at which the shares trade and the Group has 
authority to buy back its existing shares when deemed 
to be in the best interest of the Company and its 
shareholders. Buying back shares at a discount signals the 
Board’s confidence in the overall approach and the NAV to 
shareholders and is accretive to the NAV per share return.

In addition, the Group is investing in developing its investor 
relations activity and overall approach to communications to 
help ensure that shareholders have the best understanding of 
the strategy and approach to investing.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  25

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
Principal Risks and Viability

Risk

Mitigation 

Market risk 
Price risk  
RIT invests in a number of asset categories including stocks, 
equity funds, private investments, absolute return and credit, 
real assets, government bonds and derivatives. The portfolio 
is therefore exposed to the risk that the fair value of these 
investments will fluctuate because of changes in market 
prices.

Currency risk 
Consistent with the Investment Policy, the Group invests 
globally in assets denominated in currencies other than 
sterling as well as adjusting currency exposure to either seek 
to hedge and/or enhance returns. This approach exposes the 
portfolio to currency risk as a result of changes in exchange 
rates.

Interest rate risk 
In addition, the Group is exposed to the direct and indirect 
impact of changes in interest rates.

Liquidity risk  
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will have difficulty in 
meeting its obligations in respect of financial liabilities as they 
fall due. 

The Group has significant investments in and commitments 
to direct private investments and funds which are inherently 
illiquid. In addition, the Group holds investments with other 
third-party organisations which may require notice periods in 
order to be realised. Capital commitments could, in theory, 
be drawn with minimal notice. In addition, the Group may be 
required to provide additional margin to support derivative 
financial instruments. 

The Group has a widely diversified investment portfolio 
which significantly reduces the exposure to individual asset 
price risk. Detailed portfolio valuations and exposure analysis 
are prepared regularly and form the basis for the ongoing risk 
management and investment decisions. In addition, regular 
scenario analysis is undertaken to assess likely downside 
risks and sensitivity to broad market changes, as well as 
assessing the underlying correlations amongst the separate 
asset classes.

Currency exposure is managed via an overlay strategy, 
typically using a combination of currency forwards and/or 
options to adjust the natural currency of the investments 
in order to achieve a desired net exposure. The geographic 
revenue breakdown for stocks as well as correlations with 
other asset classes are also considered as part of our 
hedging strategy.

Exposure management is undertaken with a variety of 
techniques including using equity index and interest rate 
futures and options to hedge or to increase equity and 
interest rate exposure depending on overall macroeconomic 
and market views.

The Group manages its liquid resources to ensure sufficient 
cash is available to meet its expected needs. It monitors the 
level of short-term funding and balances the need for access 
to such funding and liquidity, with the long-term funding 
needs of the Group, and the desire to achieve investment 
returns. Covenants embedded within the banking facilities 
and long-term notes are monitored on an ongoing basis for 
compliance, and form part of the regular stress tests.

In addition, existing cash reserves, as well as the significant 
liquidity that could be realised from the sale or redemption 
of portfolio investments and undrawn, committed 
borrowings, could all be utilised to meet short-term funding 
requirements if necessary. As a closed-ended company, 
there is no requirement to maintain liquidity to service 
investor redemptions. The Depositary, BNP Paribas (BNP) has 
separate responsibilities in monitoring the Company’s cash 
flow.

26 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
Principal Risks and Viability

Risk

Mitigation 

Credit risk  
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty to a financial 
instrument held by the Group will fail to meet an obligation 
which could result in a loss to the Group.

Certain investments held within the absolute return and 
credit portfolio are exposed to credit risk, including in relation 
to underlying positions held by funds.

Substantially all of the listed portfolio investments capable of 
being held in safe custody, are held by BNP as custodian and 
depositary. Bankruptcy or insolvency of BNP may cause the 
Group’s rights with respect to securities held by BNP to be 
delayed.

Unrealised profit on derivative financial instruments held 
by counterparties is potentially exposed to credit risk in the 
event of the insolvency of a broker counterparty.

Key person dependency  
In common with other investment trusts, investment 
decisions are the responsibility of a small number of key 
individuals within the Manager. If for any reason the services 
of these individuals were to become unavailable, there could 
be a significant impact on our business. 

The majority of the exposure to credit risk within the absolute 
return and credit portfolio is indirect exposure as a result of 
positions held within funds managed externally. These are 
typically diversified portfolios monitored by the third-party 
managers themselves, as well as through JRCM’s ongoing 
portfolio management oversight. 

Listed transactions are settled on a delivery versus payment 
basis using a wide pool of brokers. Cash holdings and margin 
balances are also divided between a number of different 
financial institutions, whose credit ratings are regularly 
monitored.

All assets held directly by the custodian are in fully 
segregated client accounts. Other than where local market 
regulations do not permit it, these accounts are designated in 
RIT’s name. The custodian’s most recent credit rating was A+ 
from Standard & Poor’s (S&P).

This risk is closely monitored by the Board, through its 
oversight of the Manager’s incentive schemes (on which 
it has received external advice) as well as the succession 
plans for key individuals. The potential impact is also reduced 
by an experienced Board of Directors, with distinguished 
backgrounds in financial services and business. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  27

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
Principal Risks and Viability

Risk

Mitigation 

We do not consider climate-related risks to have material, 
specific impacts on our own asset management businesses 
as distinct from the investment portfolio. Our Manager 
continues to monitor, and minimise, the climate-related 
impacts of our internal operations; we offset the carbon 
emissions of this business – categorised as Scope 1 and 
Scope 2 emissions by the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol 
– through participation in an accredited scheme and we 
are taking steps to further develop our understanding of 
our indirect emissions impact (categorised as Scope 3 
emissions).

JRCM is a signatory to the UN PRI, and the Board has 
worked with our Manager to develop JRCM’s Responsible 
Investment Framework & Policy, which incorporates 
environmental factors into our investment approach. This 
allows us to consider the potential wider impacts of climate 
change risks to our investments. 

JRCM is working with an external adviser to consider our 
ability to make additional climate disclosures in relation to 
our investment portfolio, while acknowledging the likely 
challenges caused by having investments in external funds.

We monitor developments in regulation and disclosures and 
seek as far as possible to prepare for future changes. 

The Group’s adoption of fair value in relation to its 
investments means that the climate-related risks recognised 
by market participants are incorporated in the valuations (see 
Note 1, Accounting Policies).

The Operational Risk Committee of JRCM provides oversight 
of all legal, regulatory and other operational risks across the 
Group. This Committee reports key findings to the JRCM 
Executive Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee.

JRCM employs a general counsel and a compliance officer as 
well as other personnel with experience of legal, regulatory, 
disclosure and taxation matters. In addition, specialist 
external advisers are engaged in relation to complex, 
sensitive or emerging matters. For example, during 2023 the 
Group has again engaged external advisers in supporting its 
consideration of ESG matters.

Where necessary, co-investments and other transactions are 
subject to review by the Conflicts Committee.

Climate-related risks 
Ongoing climate changes may impact either our own 
business, the external managers with whom we invest, and/ 
or the underlying portfolio investments. For our own business 
this could result in increased costs of complying with new 
regulations and/or changes to the way we operate. Portfolio 
companies could see demand pressures, an increased 
cost of capital, tighter regulation or increased taxation, all 
impacting profitability. 

Our ability to make climate-change disclosures may be 
impacted by our investment approach if the external fund 
managers with whom we invest do not provide the desired 
information.

More frequent extreme weather could disrupt businesses, 
travel, global supply chains and profitability.

Legal and regulatory risk  
As an investment trust, RIT’s operations are subject to 
wide-ranging laws and regulations including in relation to the 
Listing Rules and Disclosure, Guidance and Transparency 
Rules of the FCA’s Primary Markets function, the Companies 
Act 2006, corporate governance codes, as well as continued 
compliance with relevant tax legislation, including ongoing 
compliance with the rules for investment trusts. JRCM is 
authorised and regulated by the FCA and acts as Alternative 
Investment Fund Manager.

The financial services sector continues to experience 
regulatory change at national and international levels, 
including in relation to climate change. Failure to act in 
accordance with these laws and regulations could result 
in fines, censure or other losses including taxation or 
reputational loss. 

Co-investments and other arrangements with related parties 
may result in conflicts of interest.

28 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
Principal Risks and Viability

Risk

Mitigation 

Operational risk  
Operational risks are those arising from inadequate or failed 
processes, people and systems or other external factors. 

Key operational risks include reliance on third-party managers 
and suppliers, dealing errors, processing failures, pricing or 
valuation errors, fraud and reliability of core systems.

Cyber security risk  
RIT is dependent on technology to support key business 
functions and the safeguarding of sensitive information. As a 
result, RIT is exposed to the increasingly sophisticated nature 
of cyber attacks, and given the growth in AI and the ability to 
utilise this for attempts at fraud and data breaches.

RIT is therefore at risk of potential loss or harm as a result 
of significant disruption to information technology systems, 
including from a potential cyber attack, which may result 
in financial losses, the inability to perform business-critical 
functions, loss or theft of confidential data, and resulting legal 
or reputational damage. 

Systems and control procedures are the subject of continued 
development and regular review. During the year the Audit 
and Risk Committee reviewed, and satisfied itself with, the 
Manager’s approach to due diligence as part of its investment 
decision making. Further details on this and internal controls 
more generally can be found in the Committee’s Report on 
pages 52 to 55.

Processes are in place to ensure the recruitment and ongoing 
training of appropriately skilled staff within key operational 
functions. Suitable remuneration policies are in place to 
encourage staff retention and the delivery of the Group’s 
objectives over the medium term. Independent pricing 
sources are used where available, and performance is subject 
to regular monitoring. In relation to more subjective areas 
such as private investments and property, the valuations 
are estimated by experienced staff and specialist external 
managers and valuers using industry standard approaches, 
with the final decisions taken by the independent Valuation 
Committee, and subject to external audit as part of the year-
end financial statements.

A business continuity and disaster recovery plan is 
maintained and includes the ability to use a combination of 
an offsite facility and cloud resources to mirror our production 
systems in the event of any business disruption. This was 
satisfactorily tested during the year.

Cyber security continues to receive an enhanced focus, with 
policies, systems and processes designed to combat the 
ongoing risk developments in this area. Such processes are 
kept under regular review including multi-factor authorisation, 
ensuring effective firewalls, internet and email gateway 
security and anti-virus software. 

This is complemented with staff awareness programmes 
(including periodic mock-phishing exercises) which monitor 
and test both the robustness of our systems as well as the 
effectiveness of our staff at identifying potential risks. We 
also test our IT business continuity plan at least once every 
year. The process for assessing, identifying and managing 
cybersecurity risks is managed on a day-to-day by the 
Manager’s IT team and overseen by the JRCM Operational 
Risk Committee. Any material risks are reported to the Audit 
and Risk Committee. 

The Manager maintains the ‘Cyber Essentials Plus’ security 
certification, the highest level of certification offered by 
the National Cyber Security Centre, the UK Government’s 
technical authority for cyber threats. This review is performed 
on an annual basis, the most recent completed in November 
2023. Additionally, the Group has specific insurance cover 
in place to cover information security and cyber risks. The 
Manager periodically also engages external consultants to 
assess the robustness of its IT systems.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  29

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
Principal Risks and Viability

Viability statement
In accordance with provision 36 of the AIC Code and as 
part of an ongoing programme of risk assessment, the 
Directors have assessed the prospects of the Group, to 
the extent that they are able, over a five-year period. As 
the Company is a long-term investor, the Directors have 
chosen a five-year period as this is viewed as sufficiently 
long term to provide shareholders with a meaningful 
view, without extending the period so far into the future 
as to undermine the exercise.

The Directors confirm that they have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will continue to operate and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due for the next five years.

In making this assessment, the Directors have taken into 
consideration the principal risks and mitigants set out on 
the preceding pages and the impact these might have on 
the business model, future performance, solvency and 
liquidity. In addition, the Directors reviewed the following:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 the Group’s current financial position (with total 
assets at the year end of approximately £3.6 billion);

 the nature, composition and liquidity profile of 
the investment portfolio (including the significant 
holdings of liquidity and the value of assets that 
could be realised within a relatively short time frame 
as well as over longer periods);

 the term structure and availability of borrowings (of 
which drawn borrowings at the year end totalled 
£281 million, with committed and undrawn facilities 
totalling £40 million);

 the ability to satisfy the associated loan covenants, 
meet the ongoing costs of the business and fund 
dividends;

 the level of outstanding capital commitments 
(primarily to long-term private funds) and the ongoing 
distributions from this part of the portfolio; and

 the continued attractiveness to shareholders of 
the Group’s corporate objective and investment 
approach.

As part of the approach, due consideration has been 
given to the uncertainty inherent in financial forecasts 
and, where applicable, reasonable sensitivities have 
been applied to the investment portfolio in moderate and 
severe stress situations, including in relation to equity 
market declines, currency movements, the imposition of 
restrictions on redemptions from external funds, and the 
level of capital calls in respect of existing commitments.

The stress scenarios under which the borrowing 
covenants would be breached involve severe equity 
market declines as well as historically high levels of 
capital calls. This theoretical outcome also does not 
take into account the Company’s ability to adjust the 
portfolio composition to avoid a breach, and to work with 
its lenders in order to either avert a breach or minimise 
the consequences. With current gearing of 3.5%, and 
in the absence of either a significant adverse change to 
the regulatory or taxation environment, it is difficult to 
reasonably envisage a situation which would threaten the 
ongoing viability of the Company over the five-year time 
frame.

Going concern
Having assessed the emerging and principal risks and the 
other matters considered in connection with the Viability 
Statement, and in particular the liquidity balances totalling 
£204 million and committed but undrawn borrowings 
of £40 million, and cash flow forecasts for the period to 
30 June 2025, as well as what the Group considers its 
readily realisable securities of £445 million, transactions 
awaiting settlement of £25 million at year end, and the 
amounts that could be realised from the remainder of 
the portfolio, the Directors consider it appropriate to 
adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial 
statements.

The Strategic Report on pages 3 to 35 and the s172(1) 
statement on page 62 have been approved by the Board 
and signed on its behalf by:

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton  
Chairman

30 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Sustainability Report

Introduction
Our commitment to sustainability and ESG is a core 
objective of the Board. It is based on a dual approach: (i) 
incorporation of principles of responsible investment into 
our investment processes for the delivery of sustainable 
financial returns from our portfolio; and (ii) in respect of 
our internal operations, we aim to be good corporate 
citizens, engaging regularly with our stakeholders and 
minimising our environmental impact. 

The Company’s aim is to invest in assets with good 
corporate governance and robust leadership, such that, 
more often than not, we anticipate aligning our votes with 
management recommendations. However, we are ready 
to oppose or abstain from voting on issues or measures 
that we feel either fail to adequately meet our principles 
of responsible investing and/or do not serve the best 
interests of the Company and our shareholders. We do 
not use proxy advisors.

In 2023, resolutions at 51 shareholder meetings were 
voted on in respect of our directly held quoted equities. 
We voted against management recommendations on one 
occasion as a result of governance issues.

Responsible investment 
Our Manager is a signatory of the UN PRI, and has in 
place a Responsible Investment Framework & Policy, 
which is disclosed to shareholders via the Company 
website. This policy sets out practical parameters against 
which investments are considered and applies across 
asset classes. We believe that this policy aligns our 
Corporate Objective with our commitment to responsible 
investment. ESG factors form a key part of the due 
diligence undertaken by the Manager prior to selecting 
investments and are monitored throughout our holding of 
the investment. 

In Q3 2023, the Manager submitted its first report under 
UN PRI on a voluntary basis and we will continue to build 
on our reporting capabilities for future submissions.

Responsible investment approach
Investment due diligence 
The Manager continues to strengthen the integration 
of sustainable investment principles into its decision-
making processes. Due diligence prior to making new 
investments always includes the evaluation of key ESG 
risks in addition to the traditional process of financial 
analysis associated with the asset class or investment. 

This applies across the investment universe of directly-
held quoted equity and private equity positions, as well as 
investments in uncorrelated strategies.

Voting policy and escalation 
We endeavor to be active owners of companies in which 
we invest. Save for voting rights on the Company’s 
investments held in segregated accounts managed by 
external managers, who have control of the voting of 
those shares, the Manager’s investment department 
determines voting on all the resolutions of directly held 
investee companies and maintains close and ongoing 
scrutiny of all aspects of company performance including 
ESG-related factors. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  31

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Sustainability Report

vesting  through 
RIT’s diversified, 
global portfolio

In respect of private fund investments, we may have a 
position on the fund’s limited partner advisory board which 
gives us further opportunity to shape ESG and broader risk 
management considerations. 

Engagement and active ownership
Reflecting our Corporate Objective, many of our investments 
are for the long term, and the ongoing relationship with our 
external managers and investee companies, as well as our 
regular evaluation of their approach, is crucially important 
to maintaining active ownership of that investment over 
time. Stewardship activities are key tools to address any 
ESG concerns, and we maintain a regular dialogue with 
external managers and companies alike, intervening where 
we consider it to be in the Company’s and our shareholder’s 
best interest. We also seek full portfolio transparency and 
request detailed reporting from our external managers, 
where possible. 

Our commitment

Our commitment to sustainability through ongoing ESG integration 
is based on a dual approach.

Our dual approach to sustainability

A responsible investor

A good corporate citizen

Incorporation of principles  
of responsible investment into our  
processes for the delivery of sustainable 
financial returns, while preserving  
shareholders’ capital.

Engagement with all our stakeholders 
and minimise our environmental  
impact.

Our core values

Respect

Dignity

Integrity

32 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Sustainability Report

Stakeholder engagement
The Board recognises the benefits of engaging with its 
stakeholders in order to ensure that it is aware, and can 
take account of, their views during Board discussions and 
decision making. As a result, the processes and initiatives 
below are in place.

People
There is a focus on having a working environment where 
there is engagement and communication between 
employees at all levels. Throughout the year, ‘town hall’ 
meetings for all Group employees are held and chaired 
by the Chairman (who is designated as the Director 
responsible for engagement with employees). More 
generally, regular internal communication is encouraged 
through team meetings, training sessions, presentations 
and also social and team-building events.

We aim to foster a supportive and inclusive working 
environment where all our employees are treated with 
dignity and respect, regardless of their gender, age, 
ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation or background. 
As part of the Group’s diversity and inclusion policies, 
we incorporate ‘blind’ recruitment practices where a job 
applicant’s personally identifiable information, such as 
name, gender and age is omitted from their CVs to avoid 
unconscious bias.

At the year end, our Board composition complied with 
the recommendations of the Parker Review, the FTSE 
Women Leaders Review (previously the Hampton-
Alexander Review) and the FCA’s Listing Rules reporting 
requirements on diversity. The overall employee 
composition consisted of 43 men and 19 women.

The Manager continues to participate in the ‘10,000 Black 
Interns Foundation’ which aims to attract more diverse 
and under-represented talent to the asset management 
sector, as well as the ‘Girls Are INvestors’ (GAIN) 
programme, which aims to improve gender diversity in 
the investment sector.

We are committed to the professional development 
of our employees and we encourage open and honest 
communication across the firm. We operate a formal 
annual appraisal process, designed to reinforce the 
Group’s overall strategy and culture, and to ensure 
that employees have a clear understanding of their 
performance and can discuss their goals in order to reach 
their full potential. We deem learning required to fulfil 
an employee’s current role crucial and also encourage 
the development of skills and knowledge beyond that. 
Accordingly, all staff were required to complete various 
training modules during the year, including in respect of 
diversity and inclusion in the workplace.

We take all our employees’ wellbeing seriously and have 
maintained flexible hybrid and remote working policies, 
as well as offering confidential mental health support and 
a wide range of health and wellbeing benefits. Further 
initiatives we have in place include an enhanced maternity 
leave programme as well as adoption and shared parental 
leave.

In addition, there is a clear and independent 
whistleblowing process for employees to raise any 
concerns.

Society and communities
The society and communities in which we operate are 
important to us and employees have been engaged in 
activities to help support our community with various 
charitable initiatives to support good causes during the 
year. We also facilitate employees taking advantage of the 
‘Give As You Earn’ initiative through which employees can 
make personal charitable contributions.

Shareholders
In 2023, resources have been allocated to strengthen 
our marketing and investor relations capabilities leading 
to enhanced communication and engagement with 
shareholders, proxy advisors, corporate governance 
specialists and analysts, through numerous shareholder 
meetings, webinars and investor presentations. The 
Manager regularly reports to the Board on its shareholder 
and analyst meetings to ensure they understand 
shareholders’ views of the Company. The Chairman also 
maintains regular contact with major shareholders and 
will continue to do so. In addition, our monthly NAV 
announcements now contain commentary from the 
Manager on investment performance during the relevant 
month, including in respect of each of the core pillars in 
our portfolio, and also provides broader macroeconomic 
observations.

The Board recognises the importance shareholders place 
on ESG considerations and is committed to advancing 
the ESG agenda. JRCM receives advice from a leading 
international sustainability consultancy to assist in this 
area.

We conduct a regular review of the composition of our 
share register and receive feedback from our brokers, 
including in the form of an independent survey of 
shareholder views conducted by the brokers. We also 
have a designated email account (investorrelations@
ritcap.co.uk) to enable shareholders to communicate 
directly with the Group.

All shareholders have the opportunity to cast their votes 
in respect of proposed resolutions at the AGM by proxy, 
either electronically or by post and are encouraged to 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  33

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Sustainability Report

attend the AGM and ask questions of the Directors and 
the Manager directly.

Suppliers
We place a high value on our relationships with a broad 
group of key suppliers and service providers including 
fund managers, our auditor and professional advisers, 
our custodian/depositary, bankers, information providers, 
trading counterparties, and brokers, and continue to be 
committed to developing and maintaining sustainable and 
transparent working relationships over the long term. We 
do not tolerate slavery or human trafficking and we are 
committed to acting ethically and with integrity in all our 
business dealings and relationships. In accordance with 
the Modern Slavery Act 2015, JRCM publishes a Modern 
Slavery Statement annually which may be viewed on the 
Company’s website: www.ritcap.com.

We ensure these relationships with suppliers, some of 
whom we have worked with for many years, are subject 
to regular review and are refreshed where necessary. 
Effective management of our supplier relationships is 
critical to our ability to deliver on our broad mandate, and 
we utilise a combination of formal and informal feedback.

As part of JRCM’s Responsible Investment Framework 
& Policy, ascertaining our fund managers’ approach to 
ESG is an important part of the due diligence undertaken 
during the investment selection process, and post 
investment it is a key part of our ongoing monitoring 
and engagement. Reports on the Manager’s responsible 
investment activities are submitted to the Board quarterly.

Environment and climate change
Climate change has a significant impact on our societies 
and economies. We recognise the part that we have 
to play in supporting a sustainable future and reducing 
GHG emissions, both as good corporate citizens and also 
delivering long-term returns for our shareholders.

Our commitment to sustainability encompasses various 
areas of our operations. At our main office site, we 
procure 100% of our electricity from renewable sources 
and we have installed low emission LED lighting across 
all of our buildings. We have adopted a ‘zero-to-landfill’ 
waste and recycling policy as part of our efforts to 
responsibly manage waste. Additionally, we favour 
sustainable commuting practices by encouraging our 
employees to participate in the Cycle to Work scheme.

34 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Sustainability Report

Climate-related risks and opportunities
As a closed-ended investment fund, the Company is 
currently exempt from complying with the Task Force on 
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). However, 
the Board is aware that climate change is a systemic 
issue which is likely to have a broad impact on the wider 
economy and therefore on our portfolio. In recognition of 
this, we are working with a sustainability consultancy to 
put in place a reporting framework to voluntarily disclose 
against the TCFD in 2025.

The assessment and management of climate-related 
risks and opportunities forms part of the Group’s general 
risk management process, which is the responsibility 
of both the Board and the Audit and Risk Committee. 
This includes reviewing the Manager’s approach to ESG 
and climate-related risks and opportunities, scrutiny of 
the responsible investment practices and processes, 
discussion of emerging best practices, changing 
stakeholder demands, and the latest sustainability-
related regulations that affect the business. Day-to-day 
management of climate-related risk is delegated to the 
Executive Committee of the Manager.

Metrics and targets
As an investment company based in a single office 
and with 62 employees, we recognise that the Group’s 
climate impact predominantly relates to our investment 
portfolio. As with many other investment companies, we 
are cognisant that there is currently insufficient data to 
quantify Scope 3 emissions for parts of our investment 
portfolio and we will continue to work with our external 
managers, investee companies and other relevant 
counterparties to facilitate data collection in line with 
appropriate global standards, to enable us to report these 
emissions in the future. Notwithstanding this, we will 
begin to calculate our indirect GHG emissions (Scope 
3) from parts of our portfolio (in addition to our internal 
operations) over the course of 2024, in preparation for 
TCFD reporting in 2025.

Outside of our investment portfolio, our environmental 
impact comes from GHG emissions generated from 
employee commuting, business travel, and from our 
premises. Our focus on reducing business travel has led 
to a marked decrease in travel-related emissions. Where 
possible, executives will only travel where alternatives 
such as video conference facilities are not practical. To 
further mitigate our carbon footprint, we actively engage 
in an accredited scheme with Carbon Neutral Britain, 
effectively offsetting our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 
through the Woodland Fund portfolio, a verified carbon 
offsetting project. In 2023, the Group received a Carbon 
Neutral Britain Certification and is currently certified as 

carbon neutral with regards to its Scope 1 and 2 GHG 
emissions.

Total energy consumption for the year ended 31 
December 2023 was 479,139 kWh compared to 452,923 
kWh for 31 December 2022 with the increase attributed 
to the Group directly occupying a greater proportion of its 
property portfolio during 2023.

2023
Scope 1 Gas
Scope 2 Electricity
Total

2022
Scope 1 Gas
Scope 2 Electricity
Total

CO₂ (tonnes)
27
67
94

Intensity ratio: CO₂ 
(tonnes) per FTO1
0.4
0.9
1.3

CO₂ (tonnes)
26
59
85

Intensity ratio: CO₂ 
(tonnes) per FTO1
0.4
0.8
1.2

1 Full-time occupant 
Our GHG emissions are calculated for the Group under the financial 
control approach and in accordance with ISO 14064-1: 2018 standard 
using the 2023 GHG conversion factors developed by the Department 
for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.

The Group supports the ambitions of the 2015 Paris 
Agreement and keeps opportunities to reduce emissions 
under constant review.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  35

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 Governance

Board of Directors

Non-Executive Chairman

Senior Independent Director

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton

I

C N R V

Philippe Costeletos

I

C N R V A

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton is non-executive Chairman having joined 
the Board of the Company as a non-executive Director in April 2019. 
He is Chairman of the Nominations Committee and a member of the 
Conflicts, Remuneration and Valuation Committees. He previously 
served as an independent non-executive Director of the Company 
from 2004 to 2013.

Sir James joined UK Financial Investments (UKFI) in October 2013 
as Chief Executive and in January 2014 was appointed Executive 
Chairman. On 1 April 2016 he became Non-Executive Chairman 
of UKFI. Following the merger of UKFI and UK Government 
Investments (UKGI), he became Deputy Chairman of UKGI, a 
position he held until September 2022.

Before joining UKFI, Sir James was Managing Director and Chief 
Executive Officer of Credit Suisse in the UK, based in London. In this 
role, he was responsible for developing the Bank’s client relationships 
in Private Banking, Investment Banking and Asset Management in 
the UK. He was also a member of the Credit Suisse Europe, Middle 
East & Africa (EMEA) Operating Committee. He joined Credit Suisse 
First Boston (CSFB) in 1994. Prior to joining CSFB, he was a Director 
of SG Warburg Securities, where he worked for 15 years.

In the 2019 New Year Honours List, Sir James received a knighthood 
for services to financial services, British industry and government.

Non-Executive Directors

Philippe Costeletos joined the Board as a non-executive Director 
in July 2017 and became its Senior Independent Director in April 
2019. He is Chair of the Conflicts and Remuneration Committees 
and a member of the Audit and Risk, Nominations, and Valuation 
Committees.

He has over 30 years’ of private investment and board governance 
experience and is Founder of Stemar Capital Partners (SCP), a private 
investment firm focused on building long-term investment platforms. 
Philippe was formerly Chair of International of Colony Capital, and a 
Senior Advisor of the Blackstone Group. Previously, he was Head 
of Europe at TPG and a member of TPG’s Global Management and 
Investment Committees. Prior to that, Philippe was a Member of 
the Management Committee at Investcorp. Previously, Philippe held 
positions at JP Morgan Capital, JP Morgan’s Private Equity Group and 
Morgan Stanley.

Philippe is Chair of Clinica Tambre and Zeno Partners and a board 
member of AutoHellas, Colosseum Dental Group, Vangest Group 
and Generation Home. Philippe serves as a member of the Yale 
University Council and the President’s Council on International 
Activities. He graduated magna cum laude with a BA with distinction 
in Mathematics from Yale University and received an MBA from 
Columbia University.

Vikas Karlekar

I

A

Cecilia McAnulty

I

V

Vikas Karlekar joined the Board as a non-executive Director in 
August 2022 and is a member of the Audit and Risk Committee.

He is a qualified chartered accountant, and a graduate of the London 
School of Economics specialising in Management Sciences and has 
held a number of senior finance roles across the financial services 
industry. Vikas is currently Managing Director of Group Finance 
at Intermediate Capital Group PLC, a UK listed asset manager 
specialising in private markets, covering all aspects of financial 
and regulatory reporting, valuation governance, key accounting 
judgments, financial planning and analysis, and platform and operating 
model transformation. In addition, he is a member of the Board of 
Trustees, and Treasurer, of the Pepal Foundation, a charity focused on 
bringing together NGOs and global corporations to develop leaders 
and find practical solutions to challenging social issues.

Vikas previously spent 10 years at Barclays in a series of pan 
finance leadership roles, including Global Finance Controller for 
Barclays International Division, managing all aspects of financials, 
key accounting decisions, valuations, driving technology and 
process improvements, and leading key regulatory relationships. 
He also spent 13 years at UBS Investment Bank, in both London 
and New York in various finance leadership roles. Vikas qualified as 
a chartered accountant with KPMG.

Cecilia joined the board as a non-executive director in August 
2022. She was appointed as Chair of the Valuation Committee in 
September 2023.

She has held senior investment roles for banks and hedge funds 
including Centaurus Capital, Barclays Capital and Royal Bank 
of Scotland. Her investment experience encompasses several 
alternative asset classes including distressed debt, private equity 
and credit.

Cecilia holds a number of non-executive roles including Senior 
Independent Director of Northern 2 VCT plc, Audit Chair of Polar 
Capital Global Financials Trust plc, and Independent Non-Executive 
Director (INED) of Eurobank Cyprus.

Her former non-executive roles include INED of Alcentra Limited, 
an asset manager specialising in sub investment grade credit, a 
member of the Industrial Development Advisory Board, advising 
on grants to UK businesses and Chair of the Finance and General 
Purposes Committee for English National Ballet.

She qualified as a chartered accountant with Peat Marwick (now 
KPMG) in Glasgow. 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  37

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Board of Directors

Non-Executive Directors

André Perold

I

A

Jutta af Rosenborg

I

A V

André Perold joined the Board of the Company as a non-executive 
Director in April 2018 and is a member of the Audit and 
Risk Committee.

Jutta af Rosenborg joined the Board as a non-executive Director in 
May 2022. She is Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, and is a 
member of the Valuation Committee.

André is Co-Founder, Partner and Chief Investment Officer of 
HighVista Strategies, a Boston based investment firm. He is a 
board member of the Vanguard Group, the global investment 
company. He was previously the George Gund Professor of 
Finance and Banking at the Harvard Business School where he also 
held senior roles including Chair of the Finance Faculty and Senior 
Associate Dean.

She is a qualified accountant and holds a Master’s degree in 
Business Economics and Auditing from Copenhagen Business 
School and has held a number of senior roles in group finance, 
auditing and risk management.

Jutta is a non-executive director of JPMorgan European Growth 
& Income plc and Chair of its audit committee. In addition, she is 
a non-executive director of Nilfisk Holding A/S and chairs its audit 
committee. She is also a member of the supervisory board of BBGI 
Global Infrastructure S.A., where she chairs the audit committee.

She was previously a non-executive director at abrdn plc (formerly 
Standard Life Aberdeen plc) and NKT A/S, and was also executive 
vice president, chief financial officer of ALK Abelló A/S and Chair of 
Det Danske Klasselotteri A/S.

Hannah Rothschild CBE

NI

N

Hannah Rothschild joined the Board of the Company as a non-
independent non-executive Director in August 2013 and is a 
member of the Nominations Committee.

In addition, she is a non-executive director of WHAM, a Director 
of Five Arrows Limited and serves as a Trustee of the Rothschild 
Foundation.

Hannah is an award-winning writer and filmmaker with a long 
standing career in the media.

She was the first woman to Chair the Trustees of the National 
Gallery.

In the 2018 Queen’s Birthday Honours, Hannah was appointed 
Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for services 
to the arts and to philanthropy.

I

NI

A

Independent Director

Non-Independent Director

Audit and Risk Committee member

N

R

V

Nominations Committee member

Remuneration Committee member

Valuation Committee member

C Conflicts Committee member

Committee Chair

38 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

J. Rothschild Capital Management

Executive Committee

Maggie Fanari

JRCM is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RIT and acts as RIT’s 
Manager. The Executive Committee of JRCM is responsible 
for the day-to-day management of the business and its 
members are listed below:

Maggie Fanari (Chief Executive Officer) 
Maxim Parr (Chair) 
Nick Khuu (Chief Investment Officer) 
Aron Balas (Chief Strategy Officer) 
Andrew Jones (Chief Financial & Operating Officer)

Maggie Fanari is the Chief Executive Officer at J. Rothschild Capital 
Management Limited.

Maggie was previously Senior Managing Director, Global Group 
Head High Conviction Equities at Ontario Teachers’ Pension 
Plan which has a global mandate to invest in public and private 
companies.

She started her career as an auditor at KPMG and previously 
worked in equity research at Scotia Capital.

Maggie is a chartered accountant and a CFA charterholder. 
She also holds a BBA from the Schulich School of Business at 
York University and ICD.D certification from the Institute of 
Corporate Directors.

Maggie was previously a non-executive director on the Board of 
RIT Capital Partners plc from April 2019 to February 2024. 

Maxim Parr

Nick Khuu

Maxim Parr is the Chair at J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited.

He started his career at Jardine Matheson and has extensive 
experience working in cross-border investment between the USA, 
Asia and Europe. Maxim was previously Founder and CEO of Atlas 
Capital Group, where he worked alongside FTSE 100 and European 
corporates on their investment strategy in start-ups, growth capital 
and buyouts. Maxim was previously a non-executive director on the 
Board of RIT Capital Partners from May 2020 to September 2023.

Nick Khuu is the Chief Investment Officer at J. Rothschild Capital 
Management Limited.

Prior to joining JRCM in 2020, Nick was a Managing Director at 
Adi Capital Management, where he oversaw investments across 
a broad range of industries and geographies. From 2008 to 2013, 
he was a senior professional at Knighthead Capital Management, 
where he invested in bonds, bank loans and special situation 
credits and equities. 

Prior to this, he worked at Dune Capital Management, a multi-
strategy investment firm, and at IFL, a strategic advisory firm. Nick 
began his career in the Investment Banking Division at J.P. Morgan. 

Aron Balas

Andrew Jones

Aron Balas is the Chief Strategy Officer at J. Rothschild Capital 
Management Limited.

Andrew Jones is the Chief Financial & Operating Officer at 
J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited. 

He joined the company in 2012 having previously worked in the 
Financial Institutions Group within the Investment Banking Division 
at Morgan Stanley, where he advised major financial institutions 
across Europe with a focus on banks and asset managers. He 
started his career at Oliver Wyman in their financial services 
practice.

He is responsible for the Group’s financial activities and its 
operations. Prior to joining JRCM in 2008, he spent three years in 
venture capital and four years at Nomura, advising on its private 
equity investments as well as risk, global corporate development 
and strategy. 

A Fellow of the ICAEW, he qualified as a chartered accountant 
with Deloitte where he spent time in audit before specialising in 
corporate finance and valuation advice. Andrew was previously a 
member of the ICAEW’s Valuation Advisory Group and is a member 
of the audit committee of the British Academy.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  39

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Corporate Governance Report

Introduction
The Directors present the Company’s Corporate 
Governance Report. This describes our principal 
governance bodies, their composition, purpose and 
operation within the context of the Principles and 
Provisions of the Association of Investment Companies 
(AIC) Code of Corporate Governance (AIC Code) and the 
2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (UK Code) of the 
Financial Reporting Council (FRC), which can be viewed 
at www.theaic.co.uk and www.frc.org.uk respectively.  

The AIC Code, which has been endorsed by the FRC, 
adapts the Principles and Provisions of the UK Code 
to make them relevant for investment companies. The 
Board of Directors therefore considers the AIC Code to 
represent the most appropriate governance framework 
for the Company, while recognising that as a self-
managed investment trust, aspects of the UK Code 
remain relevant. This report sets out how the Company 
has applied the relevant principles and provisions of the 
Codes during the financial year ending 31 December 
2023.

The FRC published an updated UK Code in 2024. The 
Company will report on how it applies the updated UK 
Code, and any consequential changes made to the 
AIC Code, when it takes effect for the financial year 
commencing 1 January 2025.

Leadership
The Company has a non-executive Board, chaired by 
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton. The Board is collectively 
responsible for setting the Company’s long-term strategic 
aims, and its ongoing business and investment strategies. 
The schedule of matters reserved for the Board may be 
viewed on the website, www.ritcap.com.

The day-to-day management of the business is delegated 
under a formal agreement to JRCM, the Company’s 
subsidiary and Manager. JRCM is managed by its 

Executive Committee, who attend the regular Board 
meetings and provide detailed reports on investment 
performance as well as all operational and financial 
matters of the Group. JRCM also attends and reports to 
Board Committee meetings. As our Manager is a wholly-
owned subsidiary of the Company, the Board considers 
that this approach provides the most effective means 
to constructively challenge and scrutinise all aspects of 
the Manager’s performance. It ensures all Directors are 
regularly involved in the process, rather than delegating 
this responsibility to a selection of Directors through a 
separate management engagement committee.

As at the date of this Report, the Board comprised 
seven non-executive Directors, of which six have been 
determined by the Board to be independent, with one, 
Hannah Rothschild, designated as non-independent.

The Company has in place a structure of five Board 
Committees, with clearly defined responsibilities set 
out in their respective terms of reference, and which 
may all be viewed on the Company’s website. This is 
intended to limit the scope for an individual, or a small 
group of individuals, to dominate the Board’s decision 
making. The structure of permanent Board Committees, 
together with the delegation of investment management, 
administration and company secretarial matters to the 
Manager, is considered by the Board as appropriate for a 
self-managed investment trust on an ongoing basis.

As Chairman of the Board, Sir James Leigh-Pemberton 
is responsible for its leadership and effectiveness in 
dealing with the matters reserved for its decision with 
adequate time for consideration. This includes ensuring 
a culture of openness and debate and that Directors are 
properly briefed on issues arising at Board meetings. 
The Chairman is also responsible for ensuring effective 
communication with shareholders, making Directors 
aware of any concerns raised by shareholders and for 
facilitating the contribution of the Directors.

The current members of the five Board Committees are as follows:

Audit and Risk Committee
Jutta af Rosenborg (Chair)
Philippe Costeletos 
Vikas Karlekar
André Perold

Remuneration Committee
Philippe Costeletos (Chair)
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton 

Conflicts Committee
Philippe Costeletos (Chair)
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton 

Valuation Committee
Cecilia McAnulty (Chair) 
Philippe Costeletos
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton
Jutta af Rosenborg

Nominations Committee
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton (Chair)
Philippe Costeletos
Hannah Rothschild

40 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report

Board and Committee attendance
The Board and Committee attendance of the Directors at meetings in 2023 is shown below. In each case the 
number of meetings attended is shown first, followed by the number of meetings that the Director was eligible 
to attend. All Directors receive papers and agendas before Board and Committee meetings they are eligible to 
attend. Where a Director is unable to attend a meeting, they are encouraged to give the Chairman or relevant 
Committee Chair their views in advance.

Number of meetings held during the year
Chairman
Sir James Leigh-Pemberton
Non-executive Directors
Philippe Costeletos
Vikas Karlekar1
Cecilia McAnulty2
Maggie Fanari3
Maxim Parr4
André Perold
Mike Power5
Hannah Rothschild6
Jutta af Rosenborg

Board Audit and Risk
4

8

Conflicts
1

Nominations Remuneration
3

2

Valuation
3

8/8

8/8
8/8 
8/8
6/7
7/7
7/8
2/2
7/8
8/8

–

4/4
3/3
–
–
–
3/4
1/1
–
4/4

1/1

1/1
–
–
1/1
–
–
–
–
–

2/2

2/2
–
–
1/1
–
–
–
1/1
–

3/3

3/3
–
–
3/3
1/1 
–
–
–
–

3/3

3/3
–
2/2
–
2/2
–
1/1
–
3/3

1  Appointed to the Audit and Risk Committee on 26 April 2023.
2   Appointed to the Valuation Committee on 26 April 2023.
3   Retired as a Director on 29 February 2024.
4   Retired as a Director on 28 September 2023.
5   Retired as a Director on 26 April 2023. 
6   Appointed to the Nominations Committee on 6 November 2023. 

The Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee Report is shown on 
pages 52 to 55.

The Committee has four members, all of whom are 
viewed by the Board as having recent and relevant 
financial experience. Vikas Karlekar was appointed to the 
Committee on 26 April 2023.

The main features of the Group’s internal controls and 
risk management are described in the Audit and Risk 
Committee Report on pages 52 to 55 and in Principal 
Risks and Viability on pages 24 to 30.

The Conflicts Committee
The Conflicts Committee meets at least once a year 
on a formal, scheduled basis and on other occasions 
as and when required. The Committee is chaired by 
the Senior Independent Director, Philippe Costeletos, 
and is comprised solely of independent Directors. 
The Committee’s principal responsibility is to monitor 
transactions with related parties (as described in Note 17) 
and to ensure that potential conflicts of interest are 
avoided, or managed appropriately.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  41

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
be a senior Board position for a Board comprising non-
executive Directors. Data for the following tables was 
obtained on a voluntary self-reporting basis.

Gender identity reporting under LR9.8.6R(10)

Number of board 
members

Percentage of the 
Board

Number of senior 
positions on the 
Board
(CEO, CFO, SID 
and Chair)

Men

Women

Not specified/prefer 
not to say

4

3

–

57%

43%

Not applicable

–

see note 1

Ethnic background reporting under LR9.8.6R(10)

Number of senior 
positions on the 
Board
(CEO, CFO, SID 
and Chair)

Not applicable 
see note 1

Number of board 
members

Percentage of the 
Board

White British 
or other White 
(including minority-
white groups)

Mixed/Multiple 
Ethnic Groups

Asian/Asian British

Black/African/
Caribbean/Black 
British

Other ethnic group, 
including Arab

6

–

1

–

–

86%

–

14%

–

–

1  As a Board comprising non-executive Directors, it does not 

have executive management functions, specifically a CEO or 
CFO.  The Chairman and the SID are both men.  However, the 
Company considers the Chairs of Board Committees to be senior 
board positions.  The Chairs of the Audit and Risk, and Valuation 
Committees are held by women.

Corporate Governance Report

The Nominations Committee
The Nominations Committee meets at least once 
each year and on additional occasions as required. The 
Committee is chaired by Sir James Leigh-Pemberton. 
In accordance with the AIC Code, a majority of its 
members are independent non-executive Directors. 
Hannah Rothschild was appointed to the Committee on 
6 November 2023.

Its responsibilities include overseeing the process of the 
appointment of new Directors to the Board, overall Board 
composition, succession planning, monitoring progress 
on diversity and other matters set out in its terms of 
reference. The search process for the new CEO for JRCM 
(who’s appointment was announced in early January 
2024), was led by the Nominations Committee, which 
met upon completion of the search process to formulate 
the recommendation for the Board’s approval.

The Committee is mindful of Board balance, experience 
and diversity when considering appointments to the 
Board and is responsible for identifying suitable Board 
candidates, including considering candidates from a 
wide range of backgrounds and experiences. In terms of 
succession planning, the Committee acknowledges the 
importance and benefits of diversity, especially in respect 
of gender and ethnicity and the Committee is responsible 
for the implementation of the Board’s Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy, which may be viewed on the Company’s 
website.

The Nominations Committee is responsible for 
implementing the Board’s succession planning. Following 
Mike Power’s retirement on 26 April 2023, Jutta af 
Rosenborg and Maxim Parr replaced him as Chairs of the 
Audit and Risk, and Valuation Committees respectively. 
In addition, following Maxim Parr retiring as a Director, 
in order to become Chair of JRCM on 28 September 
2023, Cecilia McAnulty replaced him as Chair of the 
Valuation Committee. Each appointment was made 
from current members of the relevant committee and 
it was determined that they had the requisite skills and 
experience to chair these committees.

The Committee continuously monitors Board composition 
to ensure it has the right skillset and breadth of 
experience with which to function as an effective 
Board. The current composition of the Board complies 
with its own Diversity and Inclusion Policy, which 
includes meeting the gender and/or ethnic diversity 
recommendations of both the Parker Review and FTSE 
Women Leaders (previously the Hampton-Alexander 
Review). Furthermore, in accordance with Listing Rule 
9.8.6R(9)(a), as at the date of this report 43% of our 
Board are women and one Director is from an ethnic 
minority background. The Chairs of the Audit and Risk, 
and Valuation Committees are held by women. The 
Company considers being Chair of a Board Committee to 

42 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report

The Remuneration Committee
The Directors’ Remuneration Report is shown on 
pages 56 to 59.

The Valuation Committee
The Valuation Committee comprises four Directors, all of 
whom are independent, and with appropriate experience. 
The Committee plays a key role in providing the Board 
with assurance that the valuation process is rigorous and 
independently challenged.

The Committee is chaired by Cecilia McAnulty. It meets at 
least twice each year and additionally as may be required. 
In 2023, it met on three occasions. The Committee’s 
principal responsibility is to review the Company’s direct 
private and other investments to ensure that they are 
presented in the annual and half-yearly accounts at fair 
value. As a result of the inherent subjectivity of the 
valuation of private investments, these form a key area of 
focus for the Committee.

At each meeting, the Committee reviews a detailed 
report from the Manager which includes: a valuation 
report on each of the largest directly-held private 
investments, including information on the companies’ 
performance and valuation and/or the GP’s valuation 
where relevant; a sample and overall summary of the 

valuation of the smaller directly-held private investments; 
a valuation report from Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) in 
relation to the Company’s investment properties; the 
valuation approach for the remainder of the portfolio, 
including an analysis of the Company’s investments in 
private funds; and a valuation of the Company’s loan 
notes.

As part of its review and challenge, the Committee 
considers: the consistency of the Manager’s approach 
over time; the relevance and appropriateness of the 
valuation techniques adopted; and a review of the 
differences between the price achieved at a liquidity 
event and the most recent valuation prior to the event.

Effectiveness and evaluation
Many of the Directors have held or hold senior positions 
in the financial services industry, including at prominent 
investment banks or asset management companies. In 
addition, there are Directors with considerable experience 
beyond these areas. The biographies of the Directors 
and the JRCM Executive Committee on pages 37 to 
39 demonstrate a strength of experience in the areas 
required to oversee and implement the Company’s 
strategic, investment and operational aims.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  43

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Accountability
The Board, acting where appropriate through the Audit 
and Risk Committee, is responsible for determining 
the nature and extent of the principal risks it is willing 
to take in achieving its strategic objectives. It is also 
responsible for maintaining sound risk management and 
internal control systems, for setting corporate reporting, 
risk management and internal control principles and 
for maintaining an appropriate relationship with the 
Company’s auditor. These areas are further described in 
the Audit and Risk Committee Report on pages 52 to 55.

Engaging with stakeholders
Details of our engagement with our shareholders and 
other stakeholders are set out in the Sustainability Report 
on pages 31 to 35.

Compliance with the Codes
It is the Board’s view that the Company has complied 
with both the principles and the relevant provisions of the 
Codes during the year.

The following table describes how the Board has applied 
the 17 principles of the AIC Code, and the one relevant 
principle of the UK Code, in practice.

Corporate Governance Report

The process for the appointment of new Directors 
to the Board is the responsibility of the Nominations 
Committee, as is their induction and ensuring, on an 
ongoing basis, that each Director is able to allocate 
sufficient time to the Company to discharge their 
responsibilities effectively.

JRCM provided relevant and timely information on the 
financial, legal and regulatory developments during 
2023, including in the papers and presentations provided 
at Board and Committee meetings. The Manager also 
facilitates an annual ‘away day’ for the Board, where 
a number of ‘deep dive’ sessions are held on Group 
strategic issues and opportunities. This year they included 
sessions on shareholder engagement and investment 
strategy.

The Board undertakes a formal and rigorous annual 
review of its performance, its committees and each 
individual Director (including the Chairman) in accordance 
with the requirements of the AIC Code. The 2023 annual 
performance evaluation was led by Philippe Costeletos, 
the Senior Independent Director. The evaluation included 
Directors completing questionnaires which assessed 
the performance and effectiveness of each Director, 
the Board collectively and each of its committees. The 
results were evaluated and considered by the Board as 
a whole. The overall conclusion of the evaluation was 
that the Board and its committees operate effectively 
and that each Director continues to make constructive 
contributions and demonstrates commitment to the role.

The evaluation noted that the areas of focus 
recommended in the previous 2022 Board evaluation 
had been addressed throughout the year, including 
ESG integration and investment strategy. It also set 
out the Board’s areas of focus for 2024, including the 
discount at which our shares are trading relative to NAV 
and shareholder/wider stakeholder engagement. In 
accordance with the AIC Code, there will be an externally 
facilitated Board evaluation in 2024.

All Directors (other than those retiring or standing for their 
first election, if applicable) stand for re-election annually, 
subject to continued satisfactory performance. The Board 
recommends shareholders approve the election of all 
Directors standing at the forthcoming AGM.

Subject to his continued annual re-election, the 
Chairman’s tenure is not intended to exceed nine years, in 
line with the relevant corporate governance expectations. 
Moreover, as part of the wider annual evaluation of the 
Board, length of service is a key consideration when 
assessing the general requirements to regularly refresh 
the membership, diversity and overall composition of the 
Board.

44 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report

AIC Code Principle

Application

A. A successful Company is led by an effective Board, whose 
role is to promote the long-term sustainable success of the 
Company, generating value for shareholders and contributing 
to wider society.

The 2023 Board evaluation (see page 43 and 44), concluded 
that the Board and its Committees continue to operate 
effectively, with the recommendations of the prior year’s 
evaluation, addressed during the year.

B. The Board should establish the Company’s purpose, values 
and strategy, and satisfy itself that these and its culture are 
aligned. All Directors must act with integrity, lead by example 
and promote the desired culture.

As part of its role to promote the long-term sustainable 
success of the Group, the Board is tasked with meeting 
the Company’s Corporate Objective of delivering long-term 
capital growth while preserving shareholders’ capital and it 
keeps the strategy to achieve this under review. 

During 2023, the Company undertook a series of buybacks, 
acquiring approximately 8.6 million of its shares, which 
is designed to provide an accretive return on investment, 
resulting in an increase in the NAV per share return for 
shareholders. Moreover, the Board acknowledges the value 
to shareholders of a modest income yield and the Board’s 
policy is to maintain or increase the dividend, subject to the 
overriding capital preservation objective.

The Board is mindful of its contribution to wider society and 
strives to meet its obligations through ensuring effective 
stakeholder engagement by the Group. Our Sustainability 
Report on pages 31 to 35 illustrates initiatives contributing to 
the environment and wider society.

The Directors consider that the purpose and strategy 
are enshrined in the Company’s Corporate Objective and 
Investment Policy, as described in the Strategic Report 
(pages 3 to 35). Our values underpin and govern our Group’s 
operations and are based on integrity and respect for all our 
stakeholders. Together, our purpose, values and strategy 
foster a strong and healthy culture of honest and open 
communication and engagement between Directors and 
within the wider workforce of the Group, promoting fairness, 
equality and professional development. The Directors 
recognise the importance of their role in monitoring and 
assessing the Company’s purpose, values and strategy, 
which are reinforced in meetings between the Directors and 
the Manager. Furthermore, the Manager provides quarterly 
and also ad hoc updates to the Directors on how the 
Company’s values and culture are being applied throughout 
the Group’s operations and in the implementation of its 
strategy. The application of the Manager’s Responsible 
Investment Framework & Policy, with its central principles 
of ESG and continual engagement with counterparties, is 
an example of the Company’s purpose, values and culture 
working in practice.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  45

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Corporate Governance Report

AIC Code Principle

Application

C. The Board should ensure that the necessary resources are 
in place for the Company to meet its objectives and measure 
performance against them. The Board should also establish 
a framework of prudent and effective controls, which enable 
risk to be assessed and managed.

D. In order for the Company to meet its responsibilities to 
shareholders and stakeholders, the Board should ensure 
effective engagement with, and encourage participation from, 
these parties.

The Board receives from the Manager regular and detailed 
information in relation to the Company’s investment 
performance as well as in relation to its finance and operational 
capability, including the annual budget. Performance is 
measured against, the published KPIs, as well as wider 
qualitative criteria including in relation to ESG integration, risk 
management, compliance, internal controls and promotion of 
the Group’s values and business principles.

The Board receives regular reports from the Manager in 
relation to shareholder engagement as part of an extensive 
investor relations programme. The Chairman also meets and 
communicates directly with shareholders and shares these 
insights with the Board. Shareholders are encouraged to 
attend the AGM, where the Manager presents on investment 
performance and strategy and there is an opportunity for 
shareholders to ask questions to the Board and the Manager. 

During the course of 2023, we have allocated resources to 
enhance our marketing and investor relations capabilities, 
with the objective to effectively communicate and engage 
with all areas of our shareholder register and other key 
stakeholders. 

Stakeholders are also able to access and review all key 
Company literature on its website (www.ritcap.com). 
Questions may be directed to the Board or the Manager, 
via the registered office or a dedicated email address 
(investorrelations@ritcap.co.uk) and throughout the year, the 
Manager’s investor relations function has responded to a 
range of enquiries raised by shareholders.

The Group also engaged with leading proxy advisors 
during the year as part of its ongoing monitoring of wider 
shareholder expectations on ESG matters.

The Manager reports to the Board regularly on its broader 
stakeholder engagement, as set out on pages 33 and 34.

Note: the AIC Code does not include a Provision E.

46 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report

AIC Code Principle

Application

F. The Chairman leads the Board and is responsible for its 
overall effectiveness in directing the Company. They should 
demonstrate objective judgement throughout their tenure 
and promote a culture of openness and debate. In addition, 
the Chairman facilitates constructive Board relations and 
the effective contribution of all non-executive Directors, and 
ensures that Directors receive accurate, timely and clear 
information.

G. The Board should consist of an appropriate combination 
of Directors (and, in particular, independent non-executive 
Directors) such that no one individual or small group of 
individuals dominates the Board’s decision making.

H. Non-executive Directors should have sufficient time 
to meet their Board responsibilities. They should provide 
constructive challenge, strategic guidance, offer specialist 
advice and hold third party service providers to account.

I. The Board, supported by the company secretary, should 
ensure that it has the policies, processes, information, time 
and resources it needs in order to function effectively and 
efficiently.

The Chairman encourages active participation at Board 
meetings, including setting the agenda items for discussion.

The Board receives a comprehensive suite of regular 
information, including in-depth reports from the Manager 
on performance, attribution, transactions and exposures 
on a monthly and quarterly basis. The scheduled quarterly 
Board meetings include detailed reports on the finance and 
operational activities of the Manager and Group, including 
costs, liquidity, risk, investor relations, PR, IT, regulatory, legal 
and compliance matters and HR. At these meetings, the 
Manager also provides a quarterly update on ESG which is a 
standing agenda item. The Board can also request updates 
from the Manager on any matters at the various ad hoc 
meetings that are held, when required. 

Furthermore, Board meetings provide the opportunity for 
the chairs of each Committee to present a summary of 
the activities of their Committee, with minutes from the 
Committee meetings included in the Board papers.

The Board has delegated responsibility to key Committees, 
as well as engaging the Manager under a formal investment 
management and services agreement. At 31 December 
2023, the Board comprised an independent non-executive 
Chairman and seven non-executive Directors. Seven 
Directors (including the Chairman) were independent and all 
were independent of the Manager, with a clear division of 
responsibilities between the Board and the Manager.

As such, the Board considers that its decision making is not 
dominated by an individual or small group of individuals.

The Directors consider they have sufficient time to meet 
Board responsibilities. While there is a standing meeting 
timetable for the Board and Committees, the Directors 
participate in additional Board and Committee meetings 
as necessary. The Board and Committee meetings provide 
opportunities for detailed assessment of both the Manager’s 
performance as well as reviewing performance of other key 
service providers (see page 34).

The Manager provides company secretarial services to the 
Company and, together with external specialist advisors, 
ensures that Board procedures and applicable rules and 
regulations are observed. Such services also include advice 
and support to the Board on all governance matters and on 
the discharge of Directors’ duties. Directors are able to take 
independent external professional advice to assist with the 
performance of their duties at the Company’s expense.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  47

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Corporate Governance Report 

AIC Code Principle

Application

J. Appointments to the Board should be subject to a formal, 
rigorous and transparent procedure, and an effective 
succession plan should be maintained. Both appointments 
and succession plans should be based on merit and objective 
criteria and, within this context, should promote diversity 
of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and 
personal strengths.

K. The Board and its Committees should have a combination 
of skills, experience and knowledge. Consideration should 
be given to the length of service of the Board as a whole and 
membership regularly refreshed.

L. Annual evaluation of the Board should consider its 
composition, diversity and how effectively members work 
together to achieve objectives. Individual evaluation should 
demonstrate whether each director continues to contribute 
effectively.

M. The Board should establish formal and transparent 
policies and procedures to ensure the independence and 
effectiveness of external audit functions and satisfy itself on 
the integrity of financial and narrative statements.

Appointments to the Board follow a careful process, led 
by the Nominations Committee who identify candidates to 
complement and enhance the collective skills, knowledge 
and experience of the Board. The Board’s Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy acknowledges the benefits of diversity of 
gender, social and ethnic backgrounds on the Board and 
these are key considerations for the Board’s succession 
planning. The current composition of the Board complies 
with the recommendations of the Parker Review, the FTSE 
Women Leaders Review and the FCA’s listing rules reporting 
requirements on diversity.

Directors’ varying backgrounds and wide-ranging experience, 
including in the investing world and financial services 
generally ensures broad cognitive diversity, which is viewed 
as key in assisting effective challenge and discipline. 
Biographies of the Board are set out on pages 37 and 38 and 
demonstrate the strength of experience in the areas required 
to provide effective strategic leadership and appropriate 
governance of the Company.

The Board seeks to ensure an appropriate balance between 
continuity and experience, and the positive benefits from 
refreshing membership and the development of a diverse 
Board.

The Senior Independent Director led a formal and rigorous 
internal evaluation of the Board in 2023. As part of the 
evaluation, each Director completed a questionnaire which 
evaluated the performance of the Chairman, each Director, 
the Board as a whole and its Committees. The evaluation 
concluded that the Board and its Committees continue to 
operate effectively.

In respect of its evaluation of its composition and diversity, 
the Board’s current composition complies with its own 
Diversity and Inclusion Policy, which includes meeting the 
gender and/or ethnic diversity recommendations of the 
Parker Review, the FTSE Women Leaders Review and the 
FCA’s listing rules reporting requirements.

The Board has delegated the assessment of the external 
audit function and the review of the integrity of the Annual 
Report and Accounts (ARA) and Half-Yearly Financial Report 
to the Audit and Risk Committee. EY has been auditor of 
the Group since 2018 and the Committee undertook an 
assessment of EY’s performance in respect of the annual 
statutory audit of the Group for the year ended 31 December 
2023, concluding that EY had performed satisfactorily (see 
page 55). The Audit and Risk Committee also performed 
a detailed review of the 2022 ARA, the 2023 Half-Yearly 
Financial Report and this 2023 ARA, as well as reviewing 
supporting papers from the Manager, in order to ensure the 
integrity of the statements (see page 52).

48 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report 

AIC Code Principle

Application

N. The Board should present a fair, balanced and 
understandable assessment of the Company’s position and 
prospects.

O. The Board should establish procedures to manage risk, 
oversee the internal control framework, and determine the 
nature and extent of the principal risks the Company is willing 
to take in order to achieve its long-term strategic objectives.

P. Remuneration policies and practices should be designed to 
support strategy and promote long-term sustainable success.

Q. A formal and transparent procedure for developing 
remuneration policy should be established. No director 
should be involved in deciding their own remuneration 
outcome.

The Audit and Risk Committee reviewed the financial and 
narrative statements within the 2023 ARA and 2023 Half-
Yearly Financial Report, as well as supporting papers and 
evidence from the Manager in relation to this area. The 
Committee concluded that these reports were consistent 
with the fair, balanced and understandable requirement and 
advised the Board accordingly. The Board considered the 
Committee’s advice and its own review, before reaching the 
same conclusion.

Day-to-day risk management is undertaken by the 
Manager and overseen by the Audit and Risk Committee 
which receives detailed reports twice a year on the risk 
management and internal control functions. The Group’s 
system of internal controls is administered by the Manager, 
and designed to manage as far as possible the principal 
risks of the Company. Further information can be found in 
the Principal Risks and Viability section of the Report on 
pages 24 to 30 and the Audit and Risk Committee Report 
on pages 52 to 55.

The Directors’ remuneration policy was approved by 
shareholders at the 2023 AGM and is in accordance with 
the provisions of the Codes for non-executive Directors’ 
remuneration. Directors receive fixed fees without any 
performance-related elements. The Remuneration Committee 
also has oversight of the remuneration policies and practices 
within JRCM and SHL, and seeks to ensure these are tied 
to the strategy and long-term sustainable success of the 
Company.

As set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on 
pages 56 to 59, Directors are paid on a fixed-fee basis, 
as recommended by the Remuneration Committee and 
approved by the Board. Such fees take account of the 
fees paid by other investment trusts and the advice of its 
independent remuneration consultant, Alvarez & Marsal.

R. Directors should exercise independent judgement and 
discretion when authorising remuneration outcomes, taking 
account of Company and individual performance, and wider 
circumstances.

Directors are remunerated on the basis of a flat standard 
fee supplemented by additional Committee membership 
and Chair fees. There are no performance-related aspects to 
Directors’ remuneration.

In the oversight of JRCM and SHL’s remuneration, Directors 
ensure that it is set by reference to the performance of the 
Company and individuals, relative to KPIs and individual 
objectives.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  49

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Corporate Governance Report 

In addition, as a self-managed investment trust, the Board has also considered the following principle from the UK Code:

UK Code Principle

Application

E. The Board should ensure that workforce policies and 
practices are consistent with the Company’s values and 
support its long-term sustainable success. The workforce 
should be able to raise any matters of concern.

The Group’s workforce, who are employed by JRCM and SHL, 
are subject to consistent standards of behaviour set out in an 
employee handbook and monitored by the Manager.

All employees are expected to adhere to a standard of 
conduct based on respect, courtesy and dignity, adhering 
to the highest ethical standards. The employee handbook 
also contains policies on inclusion and equal opportunities, 
anti-harassment/discrimination/bullying, dignity at work, 
anti-corruption, whistleblowing, conflict management and the 
environment.

Well-established whistleblowing procedures are in place in 
which employees have available direct lines of communication 
to the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee. More 
generally, our culture seeks to encourage honest and open 
communication across the Group.

50 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Corporate Governance Report

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual 
Report and Accounts in accordance with applicable 
United Kingdom law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. Under that law the 
Directors have elected to prepare the Group and Parent 
Company financial statements in accordance with UK 
adopted international accounting standards (UK adopted 
IAS). Under company law the Directors must not approve 
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that 
they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the 
Group and the Parent Company and of the profit or loss of 
the Group and the Parent Company for that period.

In preparing these financial statements the directors are 
required to:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 select suitable accounting policies in accordance 
with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in 
Accounting Estimates and Errors and then apply 
them consistently;

 make judgements and accounting estimates that are 
reasonable and prudent;

 present information, including accounting policies, in 
a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable 
and understandable information;

 provide additional disclosures when compliance 
with the specific requirements in UK adopted IAS is 
insufficient to enable users to understand the impact 
of particular transactions, other events and conditions 
on the Group and Parent Company financial position 
and financial performance;

 in respect of the Group financial statements, state 
whether UK adopted IAS have been followed, 
subject to any material departures disclosed and 
explained in the financial statements;

 in respect of the Parent Company financial 
statements, state whether UK adopted IAS have 
been followed, subject to any material departures 
disclosed and explained in the financial statements; 
and

 prepare the financial statements on the going 
concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume 
that the Parent Company and the Group will continue 
in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and 
explain the Parent Company’s and Group’s transactions 
and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the Parent Company and the Group 
and enable them to ensure that the Parent Company 
and the Group financial statements comply with the 
Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for 
safeguarding the assets of the Group and Parent 
Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors 
are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, 
Directors’ Report, Directors’ Remuneration Report and 
corporate governance statement that comply with that 
law and those regulations. The Directors are responsible 
for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and 
financial information included on the Parent Company’s 
website.

The Directors confirm, to the best of their knowledge:

• 

• 

• 

 that the consolidated financial statements, prepared 
in accordance with UK adopted IAS give a true and 
fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position 
and profit or loss of the Parent Company and 
undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a 
whole;

 that the Annual Report, including the Strategic 
Report, includes a fair review of the development 
and performance of the business and the position 
of the Parent Company and undertakings included 
in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with 
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties 
that they face; and

 that they consider the Annual Report and 
Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and 
understandable and provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Parent 
Company’s position, performance, business model 
and strategy.

The Corporate Governance Report was approved by the 
Board and signed on its behalf by:

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton 
Chairman

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  51

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Audit and Risk Committee Report

Introduction
I am pleased to present my first Audit and Risk 
Committee Report since being appointed as Chair of the 
Committee in May 2023, following the retirement of Mike 
Power. On behalf of the Committee, I would like to thank 
Mike for his significant contribution and valuable input 
over the years.

As highlighted by our Chairman and Manager, we operate 
in an environment of increased geopolitical uncertainty, 
and with a complicated market outlook. We have also 
seen further regulatory changes, although the sizeable 
amendments to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the 
Code) initially planned did not ultimately take place, with 
the new Code published in January this year, reflecting 
slightly more modest changes.

Within this context, I would therefore like to thank the 
governance functions of the Manager for their continued 
professionalism, consistency in the quality of their output, 
and for ensuring high standards of reporting and control 
across the operations of the Group during the year.

Committee responsibility and composition
This Committee has oversight responsibilities delegated 
to it by the Board in three principal areas:

• 

• 

• 

financial reporting and audit;

risk management and internal controls; and

the external auditor.

These responsibilities are set out in more detail in the 
Committee’s terms of reference, which may be viewed 
on the Company’s website at www.ritcap.com.

The Committee currently comprises four Directors, 
each of whom is non-executive and independent of the 
Company and the Manager.

The Board is satisfied that I have the requisite experience 
to chair the Committee: I joined the Board as a non-
executive Director in May 2022 and am also a member 
of the Valuation Committee. I am a qualified accountant, 
hold a Master’s degree in Business Economics and 
Auditing from Copenhagen Business School, have held 
senior roles in finance, audit, risk management and have 
significant experience in non-executive capacities.

The other three members of the Committee at the year 
end were Philippe Costeletos, André Perold, and Vikas 
Karlekar. Philippe, who joined the Committee in February 
2023, is our Senior Independent Director. He is a Senior 
Advisor to the Blackstone Group and a member of the 
President’s Council on International Activities at Yale 
University, with widespread experience in senior roles 
in private equity, banking and investment firms. André is 
Chief Investment Officer of an investment management 
firm and a board member of the Vanguard Group, having 

52 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

previously been a professor of Finance and Banking at 
Harvard Business School. Vikas, who also joined the 
Committee in February 2023, is currently Managing 
Director of Group Finance of a UK listed asset manager 
and has held various senior financial leadership roles.

Our individual biographies are shown on pages 37 and 
38. I can confirm that the Board considers all members 
of the Committee to have sufficient recent and relevant 
financial as well as accounting and/or auditing experience 
to comply with the requirements of the Codes.

Committee meetings and activity during the year
We met four times in 2023, and once so far in 2024. 
Committee meetings were held to review the Group’s 
2022 Annual Report and Accounts and the June 2023 
Half-Yearly Financial Report. A review of the Group’s 2023 
Annual Report and Accounts was undertaken in February 
2024.

Our reviews included the assessment and assurance 
that the annual reports, taken as a whole, are fair, 
balanced and understandable and provide the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s 
position, performance, business model and strategy.

In addition, the Committee considered the evidence 
supporting the Group’s going concern and ongoing 
viability, including cash flow forecasts as well as levels 
of available liquidity. For both the 2022 and 2023 Annual 
Report and Accounts, we were satisfied with our reviews 
and advised the Board accordingly.

We also considered the year-end reports from the external 
auditor, Ernst & Young LLP (EY), and discussed matters 
arising with the Manager. The adequacy of the Group’s 
accounting policies and financial reporting procedures 
are discussed with the external auditor at least annually. 
Following these discussions and our review of the annual 
reports, we concluded that the accounting policies are 
appropriate for the Company and take into account, 
where necessary, new accounting standards.

We held two further meetings, in May and November 
2023, reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s risk 
management and internal control, with reference to 
reports prepared by the Manager, including from its risk, 
compliance and internal audit function.

During 2023 a migration to a new accounting system 
was commenced. The Committee was updated on the 
progress of the transition during the year, including 
parallel running, reconciliations and various other checks. 
The Company is expected to benefit from the full 
functionality of the new system in 2024.

In addition to the activities described above, significant 
matters we considered during the year are set out below:

Audit and Risk Committee Report

Environmental, social and governance
During 2023, the Group continued to strengthen its 
approach to integrating ESG considerations into the 
strategy, operations and investment process. The 
Manager also made its first submission under the UN 
Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI).

We recognise the importance of climate-related risks to 
the Company across our operations and our portfolio. 
During 2024, we are planning to initiate a reporting 
framework to enable us to voluntarily report against 
the Task Force on Climate related Financial Disclosures 
(TCFD) in 2025. Further information is set out on 
pages 31 to 35 in our new Sustainability Report.

Consumer Duty
The FCA’s Consumer Duty regulation came into effect 
on 31 July 2023, introduced to create a new standard of 
care that firms are expected to provide to customers and 
applies to our regulated Manager. In advance of the Duty 
coming into effect, firms, including JRCM, were required 
to complete a Fair Value Assessment, demonstrating, 
by way of provision of information, whether the price 
a consumer pays for a product or service is reasonable 
compared to the benefits they can expect to receive.

The valuation of private investments and other assets
Private investments represent 35.9% of net assets and 
comprise direct investments, direct co-investments 
and diversified funds managed by external managers 
(or GPs). By their very nature such investments merit 
careful attention when considering their fair value. As 
these are unlisted investments, without a public share 
price, the estimation of fair value requires the exercise 
of considerable judgement. This subjectivity means that 
there is a higher degree of uncertainty in such valuations 
compared with those of other assets. In assessing the 
fair values, there is, by necessity, a degree of reliance on 
the GPs, with co-investments and funds representing the 
majority of the private investments’ portfolio. The GPs will 
typically have access to confidential information about 
the underlying companies and are required to report 
fair values in accordance with internationally recognised 
accounting standards.

The GP’s valuations are usually prepared on a quarterly 
basis, albeit with a time lag which may be up to three 
months, as is the industry norm. The Manager reviews 
these valuations and, where possible, the justification for 
the valuation and for any changes, as well as considering 
any additional supporting information. In addition, 
where the Manager has direct access to the underlying 
companies, it prepares its own valuations using industry-
standard approaches.

The results of this analysis are reported in detail on a six-
monthly basis to the independent Valuation Committee, 
which is responsible for the final decision on valuation.

We have therefore considered the work of the Valuation 
Committee, the results of their discussions with 
the Manager and the external auditor. The Valuation 
Committee comprises four Directors, all of whom 
are independent, and with appropriate experience. 
The Committee plays a key role in providing the Board 
with assurance that the valuation process is rigorous 
and independent. Two members of this Committee, 
myself included, also sit on the Valuation Committee. 
We view the work as detailed and comprehensive, and 
are confident that the persons preparing the reports 
have sufficient and appropriate expertise through their 
experience, skills and qualifications.

Furthermore, we believe that the process is planned 
and managed to devote adequate time and resource to 
preparation and review, both by the Manager and also by 
the members of the Valuation Committee.

We also considered the work of the Valuation Committee 
as it relates to other assets in the portfolio, including but 
not limited to the Company’s loan notes and real estate 
holdings. Here, the combination of detailed processes, 
rigorous analysis and, where relevant, external advice has 
provided comfort over the portfolio valuations. The Audit 
and Risk Committee also receives an executive summary 
of the Manager’s main valuation report as well as the 
minutes from the Valuation Committee.

Principal risks
As part of its ongoing review of the risks facing the 
Group, the Committee has made changes to the way 
we classify our principal risks. In recognition of the 
increased focus in these areas, we have reclassified two 
new principal risks: Discount risk and Cyber security 
risk. The former reflects the long-standing risk facing 
shareholders in investment trusts, namely that the 
share price performance does not match the underlying 
investment performance. In relation to the latter, while 
we have historically focused on cyber security risks, the 
growth in AI and the ability to utilise this for increasingly 
sophisticated attempts at fraud, means that we have 
also reclassified cyber security as its own, new principal 
risk. The efforts taken by the Board and the Manager 
in relation to the discount volatility are set out in the 
Chairman’s Statement. In relation to cyber security, the 
Committee carefully considered the measures in place 
across the Group to mitigate these risks. The Manager 
has successfully maintained its external classifications, 
meeting the National Cyber Security Centre requirements 
to hold ‘Cyber Essentials’ and ‘Cyber Essential Plus’ 
certifications. The Committee was satisfied that sufficient 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  53

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Audit and Risk Committee Report

and ongoing measures are in place to address this risk as 
far as is reasonably practicable.

Related party disclosures
Related party transactions are a common feature 
of commerce and business. The Group often takes 
advantage of opportunities offered to it, or services 
provided to it via many relationships built up over time 
(including those arising from Board members). Disclosure 
of such transactions is a requirement in order to allow 
shareholders and other users of the financial statements 
to assess the risks and opportunities facing the Group.

The review further included consideration of the five-year 
cash flow forecasts and a liquidity summary, the main 
portfolio exposures, as well as the results of the quarterly 
portfolio stress tests. In addition, the Committee 
reviewed the log of operational risk incidents during the 
year, noting that none had a significant impact on the 
business.

The Committee considers that the procedures in place 
are consistent with the most recent Guidance on Risk 
Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and 
Business Reporting published by the FRC.

We consider the work of the Conflicts Committee in 
reviewing advisory services, co-investment transactions 
and any other similar arrangements with any related party, 
and have discussed with the Manager the systems and 
processes in place to identify, review, record and disclose 
such transactions. We note the importance that the Board 
and the Manager place upon the work of the Conflicts 
Committee. We have reviewed the disclosures made in 
the financial statements regarding such transactions and 
consider that the necessary disclosures have been made.

Internal control
The Board of Directors is responsible for the Group’s 
system of internal control, and it has delegated the 
supervision of the system to this Committee. The system 
is designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk 
of failure to achieve business objectives and, as such, 
can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance 
against any material misstatement or loss.

The Board, who are ultimately responsible for risk 
management, has delegated to the Manager the 
implementation and day-to-day management of the 
system of internal control within an established 
framework applicable throughout the Group. A standard 
‘three lines of defence’ approach is used to ensure 
robust risk management, encompassing: day-to-day 
risk management; risk oversight and guidance; and risk 
assurance as provided by the external and internal audit 
functions, both of which report to this Committee.

The system of internal control is reviewed twice each 
year by the Committee, using a comprehensive report 
prepared by the Manager. The report outlines each of the 
principal risks and their management, covering all aspects 
of financial and operational risk as summarised in the 
Principal Risks and Viability section on pages 24 to 30. The 
relative importance of each principal risk is assessed by 
reference to the possible impact on the Group’s net asset 
value or share price should a loss occur, alongside the 
likelihood of that loss occurring, taking into consideration 
the existing control environment.

54 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Internal audit and compliance
As part of the review of the control environment, the 
Manager, through its Compliance Officer, undertakes 
an internal audit of selected areas agreed with the 
Committee. The 2023 internal audits included the 
governance and internal control processes associated 
with investment decision making, as well as the key 
control procedures employed by the Manager, to ensure 
the accuracy of information for regular NAV reporting. 
No material weaknesses were identified through the 
course of these audits and the Committee considers the 
resource devoted to internal audit to be appropriate to the 
size and complexity of the Company’s operations.

As part of their duties as depository, BNP undertook a 
review of our Manager’s arrangements under AIFMD 
and the relevant UK legislation and regulations. This 
involved reviewing processes, systems and controls for 
organisational structure, compliance, risk management, 
fund administration and business continuity, with no 
concerns noted.

EY separately audited the Manager’s client asset 
procedures in relation to a very small amount of legacy 
client money held prior to this being distributed to charity 
(while retaining the liability in case any future claimants 
arise).

The Manager also reports to the Committee the results 
of its monitoring of external fund managers’ compliance 
with the terms of their investment management 
arrangements, as well as periodically reviewing their own 
control procedures.

The Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the system 
of internal control in operation during the financial year, 
and up to the date of this report, through the Committee. 
During the reviews conducted, the Committee has not 
identified or been informed of any failings or weaknesses 
representing a significant business risk.

Audit and Risk Committee Report

External auditor
The external auditor, EY, has completed its sixth annual 
audit following its appointment as a result of a tender 
process in 2017. Consistent with its own procedures in 
relation to independence and rotation, the previous audit 
partner retired from the audit having completed five 
years, and was replaced by a new audit partner during the 
year.

EY attended all meetings of the Committee and provided 
reports on: its audit approach and work undertaken; 
the quality and effectiveness of the Group’s accounting 
records; and its findings in connection with the Group’s 
annual statutory audit for the year ended 31 December 
2023. I have also had regular contact with the new audit 
partner during the year.

The level of non-audit services provided to the Group by 
the auditor is subject to pre-approval in accordance with 
our policy on non-audit services and is monitored, as 
is the auditor’s objectivity in providing such service, to 
ensure that the independence of the audit team from the 
Group is not compromised. Non-audit services provided 
by EY in 2023 totalled £8,650 for audit-related assurance 

work (regarding the Manager’s regulated activities). Their 
selection for this work was based on cost efficiency, 
synergies with the audit process, and the fact that these 
services are permitted by the FRC’s revised Ethical 
Standard. Further information on fees paid to the auditor 
is set out in Note 5 to the financial statements.

The Committee considered EY’s independence, 
objectivity, and the effectiveness of the audit process 
with the benefit of formal and informal feedback from the 
Manager and concluded satisfactorily on each of these 
points.

Finally, I would like to thank my colleagues on the 
Committee for their support and wise counsel during the 
year, and the team at the Manager for their dedication 
and professionalism.

Jutta af Rosenborg
Chair, Audit and Risk Committee

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  55

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Directors’ Remuneration Report

Introduction
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 
31 December 2023.

The current Directors’ Remuneration Policy was approved 
by shareholders with 99% of the vote at the 2023 AGM. 

As well as the remuneration of RIT Directors, the 
Committee is also responsible for oversight of the 
remuneration policies associated with our operating 
subsidiaries: JRCM, a regulated entity whose 
remuneration arrangements are governed by the FCA’s 
applicable Remuneration Codes, and SHL, our events and 
property subsidiary. Here, incentive schemes are in place, 
tailored to the respective businesses and appropriately 
structured and aligned with shareholders’ interests.

The Directors’ Remuneration Policy and Remuneration 
Report have been prepared in accordance with the Listing 
Rules of the FCA, the relevant sections of the Companies 
Act 2006 and The Large and Medium-sized Companies 
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 
(as amended). It also sets out how it has applied the 
principles of the Codes relevant to the Company.

Directors’ Remuneration Policy
In accordance with the provisions of the AIC Code and 
the UK Code, non-executive Directors’ remuneration 
reflects their duties and time commitments and is set at a 
reasonable level which is consistent with the requirement 
to attract and retain Directors of the appropriate quality 
and experience. The Board’s policy is that the fees paid to 
the non-executive Directors should reflect the experience 
of the Board as a whole, be fair and should take account 
of the level of fees paid by other investment trusts. Any 
views expressed by shareholders on the fees being paid 
to Directors will be taken into consideration by the Board 
when reviewing the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.

Furthermore, the Company’s Articles of Association 
currently limit the aggregate base fees of the non-
executive Directors (excluding the Chairman) to £400,000 
per annum. The non-executive Directors receive base fees 
and Committee Chair and membership fees. They are not 
eligible for any other remuneration or benefits apart from 
the reimbursement of allowable expenses. There are no 
performance conditions relating to Directors’ fees and 
they are not entitled to any long-term incentive or pension 
schemes. No compensation is payable on loss of office.

Committee structure and responsibilities
I have chaired the Committee since 22 July 2019, 
having previously served on it since 26 April 2018. As at 
31 December 2023, the Committee included two further 
independent non-executive Directors: Sir James Leigh-
Pemberton and Maggie Fanari. Maxim Parr stepped down 

56 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

from the Committee when he retired from the Board 
on 28 September 2023.  The Committee meets at least 
twice a year on a scheduled basis and additionally as 
may be required. In 2023, the Committee met on three 
occasions. 

The Committee is responsible for recommending the 
fees paid to the non-executive Chairman and Directors, 
by reference to the roles and time commitment of each 
individual concerned. The final determination of the fees 
payable to non-executive Directors is a matter for the 
Board of Directors as a whole.

The overall fee structure is assessed in part by reference 
to other investment trusts. The Committee seeks 
information from JRCM management and advice from an 
independent advisor, as required.

The Remuneration Committee has appointed a 
remuneration specialist from Alvarez & Marsal, to 
provide the Committee with advice. In 2023, fees of 
approximately £12,675 (2022: £11,519) were paid to 
Alvarez & Marsal in respect of their advice. Alvarez & 
Marsal abides by the Remuneration Consultant’s Code 
of Conduct which requires it to provide objective and 
impartial advice. It has no other relationships with the 
Group and is therefore independent.

In accordance with Part 15, Chapter 6 of the Companies 
Act 2006, the Directors’ Remuneration Policy applies to 
the Directors of the Company, all of whom are non-
executives.

Incentive structures
In accordance with the relevant principles of the Codes, 
the Remuneration Committee has sought to ensure that 
there is an appropriate Group-wide incentive structure 
to attract, motivate and retain the high-quality individuals 
we need to deliver our long-term strategic aims and 
sustainable success. The remuneration approach is 
designed to align with and reinforce these strategic aims, 
while promoting responsible risk management.

Fixed remuneration for the Group’s employees 
comprises a base salary, which reflects their talent, skills, 
competencies and contributions to the Group. Each 
employee’s salary is reviewed on an annual basis, and 
considers such factors as market levels of remuneration 
and individual performance. During 2023, salary increases 
were implemented on a tiered basis, targeted towards 
more junior employees who were most susceptible to 
the financial pressures brought about by higher inflation 
and the rising cost of living. Employees are also eligible to 
receive various benefits, including pension contributions 
and private medical insurance.

Directors’ Remuneration Report

The Group operates an Annual Incentive Scheme (AIS) for 
employees as well as longer-term share-based awards. 
The annual cap for total awards under the AIS is limited 
to 0.75% of net assets. Our approach is designed to 
measure and reward performance, and seeks to provide 
an appropriate balance between shorter-term awards and 
longer-term incentives, as well as the need for robust risk 
management. We remain satisfied with the suitability of 
the AIS in order to meet our objectives.

The performance assessment for awards under the 
AIS reflect quantitative investment outperformance 
(as measured by the NAV per share total return versus 
two KPIs: CPI plus 3.0% and the ACWI) as well as 
discretionary awards for wider achievements not directly 
linked to the overall NAV return. This may include prudent 
risk controls, deal origination, efficient regulation and 
initiatives which support and enhance our values and 
culture. Any such qualitative rewards are measured 
against rigorous performance metrics through a Group-
wide annual appraisal process.

The AIS is measured annually and includes longer-term 
features such as a three-year, ‘high water mark’ in relation 
to absolute outperformance. In addition, and in particular 
for management and senior employees, AIS awards 
include significant deferrals into RIT shares. For awards 
above £250,000, 60% of these awards are made in 
deferred RIT shares. These vest over the subsequent 
three years, reinforcing the alignment with shareholders’ 
interests.

Decisions made by the Committee have followed a 
careful appraisal of performance and at all times aim to 
reinforce shareholder alignment, both through the link to 
our objectives and also the payment via shares.

AIS awards are subject to malus conditions and the 
Committee retains the ability to clawback previous 
awards if necessary.

The second main aspect of the remuneration approach is 
a long-term incentive plan which is structured as awards 
of restricted share units (RSUs). RSUs are increasingly 
being adopted by listed companies and they form an 
important part of aligning awards with our long-term 
investment performance and shareholder value creation.  
They vest after three years and then have a further two-
year lock-up before the underlying RIT shares can be 
sold. The vesting of an RSU is ordinarily subject to the 
participant’s continued service over the vesting period. 
Following the two-year lock-up, the RSUs are transferred 
directly to participants who are then free to sell them 
if they so choose. RSUs also incorporate qualitative 
performance standards, as well as malus and clawback 
features. 

Ordinary shares of the Company are used to settle the 
share components of existing and future awards granted. 
The Group seeks to hedge its exposure to RSUs by using 
an employee benefit trust to acquire shares to meet the 
estimated future liability. 

Consulting with shareholders
Where appropriate, the Committee is responsible 
for ensuring that there is pro-active engagement and 
consultation with major shareholders and shareholder 
representatives in respect of remuneration.

Non-executive Directors’ remuneration
The remuneration of the non-executive Chairman and 
Directors is determined by the Board as a whole. Non-
executive fees are reviewed periodically by the Board 
with reference to market levels in other investment 
trusts. The Board has discretion to periodically review and 
amend fee rates. The current fee rates are listed below:

Base fee:
  Non-executive Chairman1
  Non-executive Director 
Additional fees:
  Senior Independent Director fee 
Committee membership fees:
  Audit and Risk Committee 
  Conflicts Committee 
  Nominations Committee 
  Remuneration Committee 
  Valuation Committee 
Audit and Risk Committee Chairmanship2 
All other Committee Chairmanship fees  
(per committee)2 

£150,000
£35,000

£7,500

£6,000
£3,000
£4,000
£4,000
£6,000
£10,000

£7,500

1  The non-executive Chairman fee is inclusive of membership of Board 
Committees.

2  The Committee Chairmanship fees are in addition to the Committee 
membership fees.

The non-executive Directors each have letters of 
appointment that are subject to termination upon one 
month’s written notice on either side. The non-executive 
Chairman’s letter of appointment provides for six months’ 
notice on either side.

The letters of appointment for the non-executive 
Directors are available for inspection at the Company’s 
registered office.

Annual report on remuneration
The annual report on remuneration will be put to 
an advisory shareholder vote at the 2024 AGM. The 
information on pages 58 and 59 has been audited where 
required under the regulations and is indicated as audited 
information where applicable.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  57

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Directors’ Remuneration Report

Directors’ remuneration – audited
Directors’ remuneration is in the form of fees and, if applicable, taxable benefits comprising of travel and subsistence 
expenses incurred by or on behalf of Directors in the course of travel to attend Board or Committee meetings.

The following table sets out the total remuneration for each Director:

Year ended 31 December

Non-executive Director
Chairman

2021
Total
remuneration
£

2022
Total
remuneration1
£

2023
Total
remuneration
£

% Change 
in total 
remuneration 
between 2020 
and 20212

% Change 
in total 
remuneration 
between 2021 
and 20222

% Change 
in total 
remuneration 
between 2022 
and 20232

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton

150,000

150,000

150,000

Directors

Philippe Costeletos

Maggie Fanari3

Vikas Karlekar

Cecilia McAnulty

Maxim Parr4

André Perold5

Mike Power6

Jutta af Rosenborg7

Hannah Rothschild

69,500

37,000

–

–

41,774

36,000

49,500

–

30,000

74,500

44,667

13,731

13,731

48,000

52,228

61,167

31,962

35,000

79,823

46,000

39,069

40,973

38,856

44,791

21,500

57,882

35,626

–

2.4

–

n/a

n/a

78.9

(17.6)

–

n/a

–

–

7.2

20.7

n/a

n/a

14.9

45.1

23.6

n/a

16.7

-

7.1

3.0

184.5

198.4

(19.1)

(14.2)

(64.9)

81.1

1.8

Unless taxable benefits are specifically outlined below for each Director, total remuneration above constitutes fees only.

1  With effect from 1 January 2022 the annual base fee for each non-executive Director (excluding the non-executive Chairman) was increased 

from £30,000 to £35,000. This was the first such increase since 2016 and followed advice from Alvarez & Marsal on the level of fees paid to non-
executive directors of other investment trusts.

2  The year-on-year percentage changes in total remuneration are influenced by a number of factors including where Directors have completed part-
year service and/or being appointed to Board Committees during the relevant periods.

3  Maggie Fanari retired as a Director on 29 February 2024.

4  Maxim Parr retired as a Director on 28 September 2023. 

5  André Perold total remuneration for the relevant periods comprises the following:

Year

2023

2022

2021

Directors fee

41,000

41,000

36,000

Taxable 
benefits

3,791

11,228

–

6 Mike Power retired as a Director of the Company on 26 April 2023

7  Jutta af Rosenborg total remuneration for the relevant periods 

comprises the following:

Year

2023

2022

2021

Directors fee

53,782

29,044

–

Taxable 
benefits

4,100

2,918

–

58 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Directors’ Remuneration Report

Fees
The total fees payable to Directors for the year was 
£546,629 (compared to £530,498 in the year ended 
31 December 2022). This includes the Directors’ base 
fees as well as committee fees.

The aggregate base fees of the non-executive Directors 
(excluding the Chairman) for the year was £282,692, 
which was within the £400,000 limit for such fees under 
the Company’s Articles of Association.

Statement of Directors’ shareholdings – audited
The interests of the Directors holding office at 
31 December 2023 in the ordinary shares of the 
Company are shown below:

Beneficial

Non-
beneficial

Ordinary shares
of £1 each
Sir James Leigh-
–
Pemberton
–
Philippe Costeletos
–
Maggie Fanari
–
Vikas Karlekar
–
Cecilia McAnulty
–
André Perold
Jutta af Rosenborg
–
Hannah Rothschild1  14,358,443   15,402,708

11,055
72,710
–
993
–
–
8,400

% of voting
rights

<0.1
<0.1
–
<0.1
–
–
<0.1
20.2

1  The majority of the beneficial interests shown in the table above 
for Hannah Rothschild are in respect of shares held via trusts or 
companies where she is either one of the beneficiaries or one of 
the individuals able to exert significant influence. Similarly, the non-
beneficial interests are held through a charitable foundation where 
Hannah is one of the controlling trustees.

Between the end of the year and the date of this report, 
there were no changes in the Directors’ interests.

Requests from the Chairman for permission to deal 
in the ordinary shares of the Company are considered 
by the Senior Independent Director. Requests from 
other Directors are referred to the Chairman or Senior 
Independent Director. Employees of the Group are 
subject to approval by the JRCM Executive Committee 
and/or JRCM’s Compliance Officer.

Except as stated in Note 17 to the financial statements no 
Director has, or has had during the year under review, any 
beneficial interest in any contract or arrangement with the 
Company or any of its subsidiaries within the terms set 
out in the FCA Listing Rules.

Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table shows the year-on-year movement 
in total remuneration of all employees, compared to the 
dividends paid and share buybacks.

£ million
Total staff costs

Dividends
Share buybacks

Year ended
31 December
2022
35.6

Year ended
31 December
2023
33.4

57.6
11.0

56.7
163.1

Change
(2.2)

(0.9)
152.1

Statement of shareholder voting
Votes in respect of the resolution to approve the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report at the Company’s AGM 
in April 2023 were cast as follows:

Votes cast in favour

Votes cast against
Total votes cast
Votes withheld

Number of
shares
71,100,118

159,223
71,259,341
67,172

% of
votes cast
99.8

0.2
100.0
–

Votes in respect of the resolution to approve the 
Directors’ Remuneration Policy at the Company’s AGM in 
April 2023 were cast as follows:

Votes cast in favour

Votes cast against
Total votes cast
Votes withheld

Number of
shares
71,085,685

160,895
71,246,580
82,201

% of
votes cast
99.8

0.2
100.0
–

Performance graph
In accordance with the Directors’ Remuneration Report 
regulations, a performance graph which measures the 
Company’s TSR over the period from 31 December 2013 
against that of a broad equity market index is shown 
below. This is calculated by reference to the Company’s 
share price including dividend reinvestment. The 
Committee considers the ACWI to be the most suitable 
index for this purpose, being a KPI. In addition, the graph 
includes the Company’s absolute return hurdle of CPI plus 
3.0%. Further information can be found in the Company’s 
Strategic Report.

RIT Total Shareholder Return

ACWI

CPI plus 3.0%

300

260

220

180

140

100

60

Dec
2013

Dec
2015

Dec
2017

Dec
2019

Dec
2021

Dec
2023

Audit 
The tables in this report on pages 58 and 59, audited by 
Ernst & Young LLP, have been marked as such.

The Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 56 to 59 
was approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Philippe Costeletos
Chair, Remuneration Committee

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  59

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Directors’ Report

Directors’ Report: statutory and other disclosures
The Directors present their report and audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023.

Business review and future  
developments  ......................page 3
Greenhouse gas  
emissions, energy  
consumption and energy  
efficiency action ..................page 35

Corporate governance ........page 40
Directors’ remuneration ..... page 56

Risk management and
internal control ....................page 24

Directors’ shareholdings .... page 59

Dividend ............................... page 4

The section above identifies where certain information required to be disclosed in the Directors’ Report is shown within 
other sections of the Report and Accounts (and forms part of the Directors’ Report) starting on the page indicated. 
Additional statutory disclosures are set out below.

Status of Company
The Company is registered as a public company and is 
incorporated in the UK and registered in England and 
Wales (Company Registration Number 2129188). It 
conducts its affairs so as to qualify for approval as an 
investment trust for tax purposes, and has been accepted 
as an approved investment trust by HMRC, subject to 
continuing to meet eligibility conditions. The Directors 
are of the opinion that the Company has conducted its 
affairs in a manner which will satisfy the conditions for 
continued approval as an investment trust under Section 
1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010.

The Company’s subsidiaries are mainly engaged in 
investment activities and the activities of the Group are 
principally undertaken in the UK.

Directors
The Directors at the date of this report are listed on pages 
37 and 38.

During the year ended 31 December 2023:

Directorate changes
•  Mike Power retired as a Director on 26 April 2023; 

• 

 Maxim Parr retired as a Director on 28 September 
2023; 

Committee composition
• 

 Vikas Karlekar was appointed to the Audit and Risk 
Committee on 26 April 2023;

• 

 Cecilia McAnulty was appointed to the Valuation 
Committee on 26 April 2023 and was subsequently 
appointed as Chair of this committee on 
28 September 2023; and

• 

 Hannah Rothschild was appointed as a member of 
the Nominations Committee on 6 November 2023.

Corporate Objective
The Company’s Corporate Objective is: “to deliver long-
term capital growth, while preserving shareholders’ 
capital; to invest without the constraints of a formal 
benchmark, but to deliver for shareholders increases in 
capital value in excess of the relevant indices over time.”

Investment Policy
The Company’s Investment Policy is: “to invest in a 
widely diversified, international portfolio across a range 
of asset classes, both quoted and unquoted; to allocate 
part of the portfolio to exceptional managers in order to 
ensure access to the best external talent available.”

Asset allocation and risk diversification
The Group’s assets continue to be allocated across a 
diversified range of asset classes, geographies, industries 
and currencies. There are no external restrictions on the 
allocation of assets. The portfolio is further diversified 
through the use of external managers with different 
mandates. Exposures are monitored and managed by 
JRCM under the supervision of the Board.

Gearing
The Company maintains structural gearing principally 
through fixed-rate private placement notes and revolving 
credit facilities. At 31 December 2023, the drawn 
indebtedness was £281 million with debt held at fair 
value, or £294 million with debt held at par value. This 
represented net gearing calculated in accordance with 
AIC guidance of 3.5%.

The maximum indebtedness that the Company is 
empowered to incur under its Articles of Association is 
five times its adjusted capital and reserves.

Further information is shown under debt and leverage on 
page 19.

60 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Major holders of voting rights
As at 31 December 2023, the following notifications 
had been received from the holders of 3% or more of 
the voting rights conferred through the direct or indirect 
holding of the Company’s ordinary shares of £1 each.

Major holders of 
voting rights1

Lord Rothschild2,3

Hannah Rothschild2

The Rothschild 
Foundation2

Evelyn Partners Inv. 
Mgt. LLP Limited

Five Arrows Limited4

31 December 2023

Total number 
of shares

% of  

voting rights5

19,291,497

15,402,708

15,390,848

7,880,671

6,757,835

13.1

10.4

10.4

5.3

4.6

Direct or 
indirect

Indirect

Indirect

Direct

Indirect

Direct

1  The above table does not include Lord Rothschild’s or Hannah 
Rothschild’s direct voting rights in shares in the Company which 
were below the notifiable threshold.

2  As Lord Rothschild and Hannah Rothschild were both members and 
trustees of the Rothschild Foundation, the above notifiable interests 
include the same 15,390,848 shares held by this charity (which also 
represent Hannah Rothschild’s non-beneficial interests on page 59 
under Directors’ shareholdings).

3  Part of Lord Rothschild’s holdings included entities where Hannah 
Rothschild is one of the beneficiaries, and therefore the relevant 
shares also form part of her beneficial interests on page 59.

4  Lord Rothschild and Hannah Rothschild had an indirect beneficial 

interest in the shares of the Company held by Five Arrows Limited.

5  The total interests notified to the Company that directly related 
to, and was overseen by, the family offices of Lord Rothschild and 
Hannah Rothschild (including shares in which Lord Rothschild and 
Hannah Rothschild did not have voting rights conferred through a 
direct or indirect holding) was 22.2%.

Directors’ Report

Direct and indirect investment management fees 
Consistent with the Investment Policy, the Company 
invests a significant proportion of the portfolio with 
external managers. The majority of the management and 
performance fees charged by such managers are incurred 
indirectly by the Company. They are included within the 
fund investment valuations and therefore form part of the 
investment return. Three fund investments are structured 
as segregated accounts. Here, the fees are incurred 
directly by the Company (see Note 3 on page 74).

Fees within the long-only equity funds, whether 
structured as segregated accounts or otherwise, typically 
incur a management fee of 0.5% to 1.0% per annum and 
in some cases a performance fee for outperformance 
relative to a benchmark. The hedge funds and absolute 
return and credit funds are slightly higher – typically a 
1% to 2% management fee and typically a 10% to 20% 
performance fee. Fees for investments into private funds 
are structured differently and will usually have a 1% to 
2.5% annual charge (often based on commitments in 
early years and declining over time with realisations), 
as well as a 20% to 30% carried interest. This may be 
above an 8% per annum hurdle and/or with the higher 
rates often earned when investors have received back a 
minimum multiple of their invested capital (e.g. 3x).

Aggregate management fees (excluding performance 
fees and net of fee rebates) for the external funds for 
2023 have been estimated at 0.94% of RIT’s total average 
net assets (2022: 0.88%).

Share capital
At 31 December 2023, the issued share capital 
comprised 156,848,065 £1 ordinary shares, of which 
9,307,817 were held by the Company in treasury as a 
result of a series of share buybacks. Further details are 
shown in Note 21 on page 89.

No £1 ordinary shares were issued during the year and 
the existing shareholder authorities given to the Company 
at the last AGM to allot and purchase shares will expire 
at the conclusion of the Company’s forthcoming AGM 
scheduled for 2 May 2024. At the AGM, shareholders 
shall be asked to renew these authorities, as will be 
explained in the separate Notice of the meeting.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023  61

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
Disclosure of information to the auditor
With regard to the preparation of the Report and 
Accounts of the Company for the year ended 
31 December 2023, the Directors have confirmed to the 
auditor that:

• 

• 

 so far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit 
information of which the auditor is unaware; and

 they have taken the steps that they ought to have 
taken as Directors in order to make themselves 
aware of any relevant audit information and to 
establish that the auditor is aware of that information.

This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in 
accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the 
Companies Act 2006.

Listing Rules disclosures
There are no disclosures required under Listing 
Rule 9.8.4.

The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts 
and Reports) Regulations 2015
Information on subsidiaries that is required to be 
disclosed under the above regulations is disclosed in 
Note 30.

Disclosable information in respect of other investments is 
contained in Note 33.

The Directors’ Report on pages 60 to 62 was approved by 
the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton Chairman

Directors’ Report

As at 14 February 2024, the voting rights in the above 
table remained unchanged.

There are no restrictions or significant agreements that 
may restrict, on a change of control, transfer of securities 
in the Company or the voting rights attached to those 
securities.

The shares of the Company qualify for inclusion within an 
Individual Savings Account.

Cross holdings
The FCA Listing Rules also require closed-ended 
investment companies to disclose quarterly all of their 
investments in “other listed closed-ended investment 
funds ... which themselves do not have stated investment 
policies to invest no more than 15% of their total assets 
in other listed closed-ended investment funds.”

The Group discloses such investments when necessary, 
but does not restrict its own investment policies in this 
manner. There were no such investments held by the 
Group as at 31 December 2023 and 31 December 2022.

Annual General Meeting
The Company’s 2024 AGM is scheduled to be held on 
2 May at 12:00. Further details will be sent out in the 
notice of AGM to be circulated to shareholders and made 
available on the Company’s website: www.ritcap.com, in 
due course.

Auditor
EY has expressed its willingness to continue in office 
as the Company’s external auditor. Resolutions to 
reappoint EY and to authorise the Directors to set their 
remuneration will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.

Other
The Company seeks to agree the best possible terms on 
which business will take place with its suppliers. It is the 
Company’s policy to abide by such terms.

The Company maintained a qualifying third-party liability 
insurance for its Directors and Officers throughout the 
year and up to the date of approval of the Report and 
Accounts.

Statement by the Directors in performance of 
their statutory duties in accordance with s172(1) 
Companies Act 2006
The Directors consider, both individually and together, 
that they have acted in a way they consider, in good faith, 
is most likely to promote the success of the Company for 
the benefits of its members as a whole (having regard to 
the stakeholders and matters set out in s172(1)(a-f) of the 
Companies Act 2006 in the decisions taken during the 
year ended 31 December 2023 (see pages 8, 9, 33 and 34).

62 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2023

RIT Capital Partners plc

Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Statement 
of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated income statement
Year ended 31 December
£ million
Investment income
Other income
Gains/(losses) on fair value investments
Gains/(losses) on monetary items and borrowings

Expenses
Operating expenses

Profit/(loss) before finance costs and taxation
Finance costs
Profit/(loss) before taxation
Taxation
Profit/(loss) for the year
Earnings/(loss) per ordinary share – basic
Earnings/(loss) per ordinary share – diluted

Notes
2

3, 5

4, 5
6
7

8

9

9

Revenue
29.3
3.2
–
–
32.5

(28.5)
4.0
(6.9)
(2.9)
–
(2.9)
(1.9p)

(1.9p)

Capital
–
–
109.9
0.8
110.7

(14.2)
96.5
(27.5)
69.0
–
69.0
46.1p

45.7p

2023
Total
29.3
3.2
109.9
0.8
143.2

(42.7)
100.5
(34.4)
66.1
–
66.1
44.2p

43.8p

Revenue
19.1
7.6
–
–
26.7

(36.0)
(9.3)
(5.0)
(14.3)
–
(14.3)
(9.2p)

(9.2p)

Capital
–
–
(555.5)
20.2
(535.3)

(7.6)
(542.9)
(20.0)
(562.9)
–
(562.9)
(362.1p)

2022
Total
19.1
7.6
(555.5)
20.2
(508.6)

(43.6)
(552.2)
(25.0)
(577.2)
–
(577.2)
(371.3p)

(362.1p)

(371.3p)

The total column of this statement represents the Group’s consolidated income statement, prepared in accordance with UK adopted 
international accounting standards (UK adopted IAS). The supplementary revenue and capital columns are both prepared under 
guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies (AIC). All items in the above statement derive from continuing 
operations. 

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Year ended 31 December
£ million
Profit/(loss) for the year
Revaluation gain/(loss) on property, plant and equipment
Actuarial gain/(loss) in defined benefit pension plan
Deferred tax (charge)/credit allocated  
  to actuarial gain/(loss)
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year

Notes

10
11

12

Revenue
(2.9)
–
(0.4)

0.2
(3.1)

Capital
69.0
0.9
–

–
69.9

2023
Total
66.1
0.9
(0.4)

0.2
66.8

Revenue
(14.3)
–
(4.5)

Capital
(562.9)
(2.1)
–

2022
Total
(577.2)
(2.1)
(4.5)

1.1
(17.7)

–
(565.0)

1.1
(582.7)

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

64 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc
64 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |

Consolidated Balance Sheet

At 31 December  
£ million
Non-current assets
Investments held at fair value
Investment property
Property, plant and equipment
Retirement benefit asset
Derivative financial instruments

Current assets
Derivative financial instruments
Other receivables
Amounts owed by group undertakings
Cash at bank

Total assets
Current liabilities
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Other payables 
Amounts owed to group undertakings

Net current assets/(liabilities)
Total assets less current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Deferred tax liability
Provisions

Lease liability

Net assets
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Share capital

Share premium

Capital redemption reserve

Own shares reserve
Capital reserve
Revenue reserve
Revaluation reserve
Total equity
Net asset value per ordinary share – basic
Net asset value per ordinary share – diluted

Notes

2023

2022

13
13, 15
10
11
13

13
16
17

18
13
19
17

18
13
12

20

21

22

23
24
26
27
28

29
29

3,499.4
34.1
21.6
0.1
5.9
3,561.1

65.4
71.2
0.1
204.3
341.0
3,902.1

(142.9)
(2.8)
(39.2)
(0.1)
(185.0)
156.0
3,717.1

(137.9)
(0.0)
(0.0)

(3.0)
(2.9)
(143.8)
3,573.3

156.8

45.7

36.3
(36.7)
3,393.1
(32.2)
10.3
3,573.3
2,449p
2,426p

3,586.3
37.9
20.7
0.5
1.0
3,646.4

57.3
245.3
4.5
218.0
525.1
4,171.5

(236.2)
(10.4)
(63.5)
(0.1)
(310.2)
214.9
3,861.3

(134.4)
–
(0.2)

(1.8)
(3.2)
(139.6)
3,721.7

156.8

45.7

36.3
(46.3)
3,548.9
(29.1)
9.4
3,721.7
2,414p
2,388p

The financial statements on pages 64 to 69 were approved by the Board and authorised for issue on 4 March 2024.

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton
Chairman

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 65
RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 65

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
Parent Company Balance Sheet

At 31 December  
£ million
Non-current assets
Investments held at fair value
Investment property
Property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Derivative financial instruments

Current assets
Derivative financial instruments
Other receivables
Cash at bank

Total assets
Current liabilities
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Other payables
Amounts owed to group undertakings

Net current assets/(liabilities)
Total assets less current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Provisions
Lease liability

Net assets
Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Capital redemption reserve
Capital reserve:
  At 1 January
  Profit for the year
  Treasury shares purchase
  Dividends paid
Capital reserve at 31 December
Revenue reserve:
  At 1 January
  Loss for the year
Revenue reserve at 31 December
Revaluation reserve
Total equity

Notes

2023

2022

13
13, 15
10
30
13

13
16

18
13
19
17

18
13
20

21
22
23

21
31
26

27
28

3,362.3
34.1
21.5
143.2
5.9
3,567.0

65.4
70.6
196.7
332.7
3,899.7

(142.9)
(2.8)
(31.9)
(119.6)
(297.2)
35.5
3,602.5

(137.9)
(0.0)
(3.0)
(2.9)
(143.8)
3,458.7

156.8
45.7
36.3

3,578.6
77.0
(163.1)
(56.7)
3,435.8

(209.5)
(16.7)
(226.2)
10.3
3,458.7

3,485.2
37.9
20.6
107.2
1.0
3,651.9

57.3
244.9
193.9
496.1
4,148.0

(236.2)
(10.4)
(54.1)
(90.2)
(390.9)
105.2
3,757.1

(134.4)
–
(2.2)
(3.2)
(139.8)
3,617.3

156.8
45.7
36.3

4,203.4
(556.2)
(11.0)
(57.6)
3,578.6

(176.1)
(33.4)
(209.5)
9.4
3,617.3

The Company’s total comprehensive income for the year was £61.2 million (2022: expense of £591.7 million).

The financial statements on pages 64 to 69 were approved by the Board and authorised for issue on 4 March 2024.

Sir James Leigh-Pemberton
Chairman

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

66 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc
66 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
 
 
|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

£ million
Balance at 1 January 2022
Profit/(loss) for the year
Revaluation gain/(loss) on property, plant and  
  equipment
Actuarial gain/(loss) in defined benefit plan

Deferred tax (charge)/credit allocated to  
  actuarial gain/(loss)
Total comprehensive 
income/(expense) for the year
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury shares
Movement in own shares reserve
Movement in share-based payments
Balance at 31 December 2022
Balance at 1 January 2023
Profit/(loss) for the year
Revaluation gain/(loss) on property, plant and  
  equipment
Actuarial gain/(loss) in defined benefit plan
Deferred tax (charge)/credit allocated to  
  actuarial gain/(loss)
Total comprehensive 
income/(expense) for the year
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury shares
Movement in own shares reserve
Movement in share-based payments

Balance at 31 December 2023

Share
capital
156.8
–

Share
premium
45.7
–

Capital
redemption
reserve
36.3
–

Own 
shares 
reserve
(23.0)
–

Capital
reserve
4,174.4
(562.9)

Revenue
reserve
(11.4)
(14.3)

Revaluation
reserve
11.5
–

Total
equity
4,390.3
(577.2)

–
–

–

–
–
–
–
–
156.8
156.8
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–
–
45.7
45.7
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–
–
36.3
36.3
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
(23.3)
–
(46.3)
(46.3)
–

–
–

–

–
–
–
9.6

–
–

–

(562.9)
(57.6)
(11.0)
–
6.0
3,548.9
3,548.9
69.0

–
–

–

69.0
(56.7)
(163.1)
–

–
(4.5)

(2.1)
–

(2.1)
(4.5)

1.1

–

1.1

(17.7)
–
–
–
–
(29.1)
(29.1)
(2.9)

–
(0.4)

0.2

(3.1)
–
–
–

(2.1)
–
–
–
–
9.4
9.4
–

0.9
–

(582.7)
(57.6)
(11.0)
(23.3)
6.0
3,721.7
3,721.7
66.1

0.9
(0.4)

–

0.2

0.9
–
–
–

66.8
(56.7)
(163.1)
9.6

–
156.8

–
45.7

–
36.3

–
(36.7)

(5.0)
3,393.1

–
(32.2)

–
10.3

(5.0)
3,573.3

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 67
RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 67

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity

Share
premium
45.7
–
–
–
–
–

Capital
redemption
reserve
36.3
–
–
–
–
–

36.3
36.3
–
–
–
–

45.7
45.7
–
–
–
–

–

45.7

Capital
reserve
4,203.4
(556.2)
–
(556.2)
(57.6)
(11.0)

3,578.6
3,578.6
77.0
–
77.0
(56.7)

Revenue
reserve
(176.1)
(33.4)
–
(33.4)
–
–

Revaluation
reserve
11.5
–
(2.1)
(2.1)
–
–

(209.5)
(209.5)
(16.7)
–
(16.7)
–

9.4
9.4
–
0.9
0.9
–

–

Total
equity
4,277.6
(589.6)
(2.1)
(591.7)
(57.6)
(11.0)

3,617.3
3,617.3
60.3
0.9
61.2
(56.7)

(163.1)

–

(163.1)

–

36.3

3,435.8

(226.2)

10.3

3,458.7

£ million
Balance at 1 January 2022
Profit/(loss) for the year
Revaluation gain/(loss) on property, plant and equipment
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury shares
Balance at 31 December 2022

Balance at 1 January 2023
Profit/(loss) for the year
Revaluation gain/(loss) on property, plant and equipment
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury shares

Balance at 31 December 2023

Share
capital
156.8
–
–
–
–
–

156.8
156.8
–
–
–
–

–

156.8

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

68 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc
68 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |

Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statement

Year ended 31 December
£ million
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash inflow/(outflow) before taxation and interest
Interest paid
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities

Notes

32

Cash flows from investing activities:
Sale/(purchase) of property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Divestments of subsidiary undertakings

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of borrowings
Drawing of borrowings
Purchase of ordinary shares by EBT1
Purchase of ordinary shares into treasury
Dividends paid

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities

Increase/(decrease) in cash in the year
Cash at the start of the year
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash 

Cash at the year end

24
21

31

1  Shares are disclosed in the own shares reserve on the consolidated balance sheet.

Consolidated cash flow
2022

2023

Parent Company cash flow
2022

2023

328.6
(34.4)
294.2

(0.3)
–

–
(0.3)

(699.9)
618.6
(9.8)
(163.1)

(56.7)
(310.9)

(17.0)
218.0

3.3
204.3

57.7
(25.0)
32.7

(0.1)
–

–
(0.1)

(591.6)
555.4
(40.4)
(11.0)

(57.6)
(145.2)

(112.6)
325.9

4.7
218.0

331.1
(34.4)
296.7

(0.3)
(21.0)

25.2
3.9

(699.9)
618.6
–
(163.1)

(56.7)
(301.1)

(0.5)
193.9

3.3
196.7

7.7
(25.0)
(17.3)

(0.1)
(2.5)

–
(2.6)

(591.6)
555.4
–
(11.0)

(57.6)
(104.8)

(124.7)
313.9

4.7
193.9

The Notes on pages 70 to 93 form part of these financial statements.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 69
RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 69

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

1. Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of the Group and Company are 
prepared in accordance with UK adopted IAS and the requirements 
of the Companies Act 2006. The Company has taken advantage of 
section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present the parent 
company profit and loss account. The Company is domiciled in the 
United Kingdom. 

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern 
basis and under the historical cost convention except for the 
revaluation of financial instruments (including derivatives), 
investment properties held at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), 
associates held at FVPL, certain non-consolidated subsidiaries held 
at FVPL, and property, plant and equipment held at fair value. In 
making this going concern assumption, the Directors have taken 
into account the closed-ended nature of the Group; its existing 
cash balances (£204.3 million) and monitoring procedures; its 
borrowing capacity (£40 million facilities committed and undrawn); 
the value of investments which could be realised to fund liabilities; 
loan covenants as well as cash flow forecasts for the period to 
30 June 2025; and uncalled commitments (£307.1 million). Further 
details can be found on page 30.

The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below. 
Where the presentational guidance set out in the Statement of 
Recommended Practice: Financial Statements of Investment Trust 
Companies (the SORP) issued by the Association of Investment 
Companies (AIC) in July 2022 is consistent with the requirements of 
UK adopted IAS, the Directors have sought to prepare the financial 
statements on a basis which complies with the recommendations of 
the SORP. 

Climate change
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered 
the impact of climate change insofar as they are reasonably able, 
particularly in the context of the climate-related risks identified 
in the principal risks and viability section of the Strategic Report. 
These considerations did not have a material impact on the financial 
reporting judgements and estimates in the current year, nor were 
they expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s going 
concern or viability.

Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial 
statements of the Company and entities controlled by the Company 
(its subsidiaries) made up to 31 December each year. The Board has 
concluded that the Company, being the parent entity of the Group, 
continues to meet the particular characteristics of an ‘Investment 
Entity’. The ‘Investment Entity’ amendment to IFRS 10 Consolidated 
Financial Statements requires that:

(i)   the single subsidiary J.Rothschild Capital Management Limited 
(JRCM), that is not itself an investment entity, which provides 
investment management services to the Group, is consolidated 
on a line-by-line basis with balances between the parent and this 
subsidiary eliminated; and

(ii)   all other subsidiaries, including Spencer House Limited (SHL), 
RIT Investments US, Inc and RIT Investments GP Limited, are 
accounted for as investments held at FVPL.

70 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

In the financial statements of the Company investments in 
non-consolidated subsidiaries are carried at fair value and the 
consolidated subsidiary is carried at cost less any provision for 
impairment made in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. 
Impairment tests are carried out twice each year concurrent with the 
Group’s principal reporting dates.

The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared at the 
same reporting date using consistent accounting policies. Control is 
achieved where the Company has all of the following;

(i)   power over the investee;

(ii)   exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with 

the investee; and

(iii)  the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount 

of the Company’s returns.

Both the Group and Company hold investments in associates and 
joint ventures at fair value as allowed by IAS 28 Investments in 
Associates and Joint Ventures and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.

Presentation of income statement
In order to better reflect the activities of an investment trust 
company, and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, 
supplementary information which analyses the consolidated income 
statement between items of a revenue and capital nature has 
been presented within the consolidated income statement and the 
consolidated statement of comprehensive income (SOCI).

Income
Dividend income from investments is recognised when the right 
to receive payment has been established and this is normally the 
ex-dividend date.

UK dividend income is recorded at the amount receivable. Overseas 
dividend income is shown net of withholding tax under investment 
income.

Interest and other income is accrued on a time basis.

Rental income from investment properties under short-term leases 
is accounted for on a straight-line basis, over the lease term.

Allocation between capital and revenue
In respect of the analysis between capital and revenue items 
presented within the consolidated income statement, the SOCI and 
the statement of changes in equity, all expenses and finance costs, 
which are accounted for on an accruals basis, have been presented 
as revenue items except those items listed below:

• 

• 

 expenses are allocated to capital where a direct connection with 
the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the investments 
can be demonstrated. Expenses are allocated to revenue where 
there is an indirect connection;

 all segregated account fees are considered to be a cost of 
achieving a capital return for those external managers operating 
segregated accounts. This ensures consistency with the 
treatment of all other investment management fees within our 
fund investments, which are automatically included in capital and 
reflected in the investment gain/loss;

Notes to the Financial Statements

1. Accounting Policies (continued)
• 

 the Group has in place certain incentive arrangements whereby 
individuals receive share awards based on investment performance 
and/or share price growth. The cost of these arrangements derives 
principally from the capital performance and therefore the Directors 
consider it appropriate to allocate such costs to capital;

• 

 expenses which are incidental to the purchase or disposal of an 
investment are deducted from the initial fair value or disposal 
proceeds of the investment; and

• 

 costs incurred in connection with aborted portfolio investment 
transactions are also allocated to capital.

The following are also presented as capital items:

Investment trusts which have approval under Section 1158 of the 
Corporation Tax Act 2010 are not subject to tax on capital gains. 
In view of the Company’s status as an investment trust, and its 
intention to continue meeting the conditions required to maintain 
approval for the foreseeable future, the Company has not provided 
current or deferred tax on any capital gains or losses arising on the 
revaluation or disposal of investments.

The carrying amount of the deferred tax asset is reviewed at each 
balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer 
probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or 
part of the asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply 
in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised.

 gains and losses on the realisation of investments, including 
foreign exchange differences;

 increases and decreases in the valuation of investments held at 
the year end, including foreign exchange differences;

Deferred tax is charged or credited to the consolidated income 
statement or SOCI, except when it relates to items charged or 
credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt 
with in equity.

• 

• 

• 

• 

 realised and unrealised gains and losses on derivatives 
transactions of a capital nature; and

 expenses, together with the related taxation effect, allocated to 
capital in accordance with the above policies.

Finance costs
Finance costs on borrowings are accounted for on an accruals basis 
and are settled at the end of each contractual period. Finance costs 
on derivatives are settled in line with the underlying contract.

Finance costs are allocated in the ratio 20:80 to the revenue and 
capital columns of the income statement.

Foreign currencies
The individual financial statements of each Group entity are 
presented in the currency of the primary economic environment 
in which the entity operates, i.e. its functional currency. For the 
purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and 
financial position of each entity are expressed in sterling which is 
the functional currency of the Company, and the presentational 
currency of the Group. Transactions in currencies other than sterling 
are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing on the dates of 
the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary items 
and non-monetary assets and liabilities that are fair valued and 
are denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates 
prevailing on the balance sheet date. All foreign exchange gains and 
losses are recognised in the consolidated income statement.

Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and 
deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. 
Taxable profit differs from profit before tax as reported in the 
consolidated income statement because it excludes items of income 
or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further 
excludes items that are not subject to tax or are not deductible for 
tax purposes. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated using 
tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the 
balance sheet date.

Investments
Investments are recognised and derecognised on the trade date 
where a purchase or sale is made under a contract whose terms 
require delivery within the timeframe established by the market 
concerned. All investments are measured initially and at subsequent 
reporting dates at fair value and classified in accordance with IFRS as 
‘fair value through profit or loss’. Unrealised changes in the fair value 
of these investments are recognised in the consolidated income 
statement as capital items. The gain or loss arising on the disposal 
of investments is determined as the difference between the sale 
proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset at the beginning of 
the year and is recognised in the consolidated income statement as 
capital items. Transaction costs are included within gains or losses on 
these investments.

Fair value, for quoted investments, is either the bid price or the 
last traded price, depending on the convention of the exchange on 
which the investment is quoted. Investments in externally-managed 
funds are valued at the closing price, the bid price or the single 
price as appropriate, released by the relevant fund administrator or 
investment manager.

In respect of private investments, or where the market for a financial 
instrument is not active, fair value is estimated by using appropriate 
valuation techniques and often involves significant judgement and 
estimation uncertainty. For direct private investments held through 
co-investment vehicles managed by a General Partner (GP), as well 
as private funds managed by a GP, the estimated fair value is based 
on the most recent valuation provided by the GP. These valuations 
are normally prepared quarterly and usually received within three 
months of the relevant valuation date. Depending on the timing of 
the finalisation of the half-year and year-end report and accounts, it 
is likely that the majority of these assets are valued at the previous 
quarter end. Where this is the case, the valuations of private funds 
are adjusted for subsequent investments, distributions and currency 
moves. In relation to direct co-investments, the valuations will also 
be adjusted for subsequent investments, distributions and currency 
moves, as well as pricing events where there is sufficient information 
to suggest the period-end valuation should be adjusted. Further, 
in light of the intrinsic valuation uncertainty, where information is 

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 71

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

1. Accounting Policies (continued)
received after the year end which relates to conditions present at 
the year end, an adjustment will be considered if it would be likely to 
have a material impact on the net assets. Ultimately these valuations 
are dependent on the reasonableness of the fair value estimation by 
the GP. The valuations are reviewed periodically by the Manager, and 
in the absence of contrary information, are assumed to be reliable. A 
review is also conducted annually in respect of the valuation bases of 
the investee funds to confirm these are in accordance with fair value 
standards.

Where the Manager has sufficient information to undertake 
its own valuations, these will be prepared having regard to the 
International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines 
as recommended by the British Private Equity and Venture Capital 
Association. The inputs into the valuation methodologies adopted 
include observable data such as historical earnings or cash flows as 
well as more subjective data such as earnings forecasts or discount 
rates. At period ends, all of the valuations are subject to review, 
adjustment as appropriate and ultimately approval by the Company’s 
Valuation Committee that operates as a sub-committee of the Board 
comprised entirely of independent non-executive Directors.

The gains and losses on financial assets classified at FVPL exclude 
any related interest income, dividend income and finance costs 
where these items are separately identifiable. These items are 
disclosed separately in the financial statements.

Leasehold and freehold investment properties are measured initially 
at cost, including related transaction costs. After initial recognition at 
cost, investment properties are carried at their fair values based on 
the external professional valuation made as of each reporting date. 
Valuation surpluses and deficits arising in the year are included in the 
consolidated income statement.

Derivative financial instruments, including futures, options and 
other derivatives, are stated in the balance sheet at fair value. For 
derivatives that are capital in nature, the associated change in value 
is presented as a capital item in the income statement. The Group 
has adopted trade date accounting. Accordingly, derivative financial 
instruments are recognised on the date the Group enters into the 
relevant contract, and are derecognised on the date on which it 
commits to their sale or they expire. All derivatives are classified as 
FVPL and are presented as assets when their fair value is positive, 
and as liabilities when their fair value is negative.

settled incentive schemes include the Annual Incentive Scheme 
(AIS) (in part), share appreciation rights (SARs) and restricted share 
units (RSUs).

AIS awards are structured such that 60% of individual amounts in 
excess of £250,000 are paid in deferred shares of the Company 
which vest equally over the three years following the award. Deferred 
shares are valued using the prevailing market price at award. The 
expense is recognised over the year the award relates to and the 
following three years.

Historically, long-term incentive plan (LTIP) awards were made via 
SARs and performance shares. SARs were measured at the fair 
value at grant date using a trinomial option valuation model. The 
cost is then recognised through the capital column of the income 
statement over the three-year vest period.

Performance shares were conditional awards of shares subject to 
performance conditions. They were accounted for as equity settled 
in accordance with IFRS 2. The awards were fair valued at grant 
using a Monte Carlo model and the resulting cost of an award is then 
recognised through the capital column of the income statement over 
the vest period particular to that award.

Following a review by the Remuneration Committee, it was decided 
that from 2021, future LTIP awards would be made using restricted 
share units (RSUs), with the first such award in March 2021.

RSUs are equity-settled awards accounted for in accordance with 
IFRS 2 and are measured at fair value using the share price at the 
grant date, adjusted for a two year post-vesting sale restriction. 
The cost is recognised through the capital column of the income 
statement over the three-year vest period. 

On 31 March 2021, staff members were given the option to convert 
their existing SARs and performance shares at fair value into RSUs, 
with the vast majority subsequently converted. This conversion was 
accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2.

Shares required to meet the estimated future requirements 
from grants or exercises under all schemes, are purchased by an 
Employee Benefit Trust (EBT), which is consolidated by the Group. 
The cost of own shares held at the end of the year by the EBT is 
reflected in the Group’s own shares reserve on the consolidated 
balance sheet.

The movement in equity arising under IFRS 2 is applied to the capital 
reserve.

Cash at bank
Cash at bank in the balance sheet comprises cash balances and 
deposits.

Provisions
A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group or 
Company has a constructive or legal obligation as a result of a past 
event and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be 
required to settle the obligation.

Share-based payment
In accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payment (IFRS 2), the Group 
is required to reflect in its income statement and balance sheet the 
effects of share-based payment transactions. The Group’s share-

Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is shown at cost less accumulated 
depreciation, save as detailed below. Depreciation is calculated 
by the Group on a straight-line basis by reference to original cost, 
estimated useful life and residual value. Cost includes the original 
purchase price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing 
the asset to its working condition for its intended use. The period 
of estimated useful life for this purpose is between three and five 
years for the majority of assets except for the Company’s leasehold 
interest in 27 St. James’s Place for which the estimated useful life is 
60 years, which is also the period remaining on the property lease. 
The proportion of this asset occupied by the Group is accounted 
for at fair value under the revaluation model allowed by IAS 16 

72 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

Loan notes
Loan notes are classified as a financial liability at FVPL and are 
measured initially and subsequently at fair value with movements 
in fair value taken to the income statement as a capital item. The 
fair value is calculated with a discounted cash flow model using the 
fixed interest and redemption payments based on the underlying 
contractual cash flows. The discount rate adopted reflects the 
prevailing market rate for similar instruments. As a result, the 
determination of fair value requires management judgement. Further 
details of the loan notes are provided on pages 88 and 89.

Dividends
The Company recognises interim dividends in the year in which they 
are paid.

Share capital and share premium
Share capital is classified as equity. Share premium reflects the 
excess of the consideration received on issuing shares over the 
nominal value of those shares, net of issue costs.

Treasury shares
The cost of repurchasing shares into treasury, including all related 
costs, is dealt with in the Statement of Changes in Equity and 
deducted from the Capital Reserve.

New and amended standards and interpretations not applied
There are no new standards and interpretations that are relevant 
to RIT and effective up to the date of issuance of the financial 
statements that require disclosure in the Financial Statements. 

Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with UK 
adopted IAS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. 
It also requires the Manager and Board to exercise judgement in 
the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas 
requiring a higher degree of judgement or complexity and where 
assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated 
financial statements, are in relation to the valuation of private 
investments (see pages 71 and 72 and Note 13) and property 
(see pages 72 and 73 and Notes 10 and 15).

1. Accounting Policies (continued)
Property, Plant and Equipment, which is intended to ensure that the 
carrying value of the asset is never substantially different to its fair 
value. Changes in fair value are reflected in the SOCI and a separate 
revaluation reserve. The proportion of property assets not occupied 
by the Group is accounted for as investment properties at fair value. 
Determination of fair value requires significant judgement and 
external advisers are used.

Pensions
JRCM is a participating employer in the Group’s non-contributory, 
funded, defined benefit retirement scheme which is closed to new 
members and the assets of which are held in a trustee-administered 
fund. There are no longer any active members of this scheme.

The Group accounts for this defined benefit retirement scheme 
by reference to IAS 19 Employee Benefits. The cost of benefits 
accruing during the year in respect of past service is charged to the 
income statement and allocated to revenue. The net interest on 
the net defined benefit liability or asset is recognised in the income 
statement. Actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets, 
excluding amounts included in the net interest on the net defined 
benefit liability or asset, are recognised in the SOCI. An actuarial 
valuation of the defined benefit retirement scheme is undertaken 
every three years as at 1 January and is updated as at each principal 
reporting date. The valuation is carried out using the projected 
unit credit method of funding basis. The income statement also 
includes costs incurred in respect of defined contribution schemes, 
comprising the contributions payable in the year.

Other receivables/other payables
Other receivables/other payables do not carry any interest, are 
short-term in nature and are carried at amortised cost. Application of 
the expected credit loss model to receivables has had an immaterial 
impact on their carrying value. The carrying value of receivables and 
payables approximates to their fair value.

Amounts owed to/by Group undertakings
Amounts owed to/by Group undertakings do not carry any interest 
and are carried at amortised cost. Application of the expected credit 
loss model to these items has had an immaterial impact on their 
carrying value. The carrying value of amounts owed to/by Group 
undertakings approximates to their fair value.

Bank borrowings
Interest-bearing bank loans are recorded initially at the proceeds 
received and subsequently at FVPL, on the basis that the Group and 
its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in line with IFRS 9, 
paragraph 4.2.2. The fair value is calculated as the amount to replace 
the facility which is equal to par.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 73

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

2. Investment income

£ million

Income from listed investments:
    Dividends
Income from unlisted investments:
    Interest
Interest income on cash balances
Income from investment properties
Total investment income

2023

10.1

3.9
13.5
1.8
29.3

3. Gains/(losses) on fair value investments
£ million

2023

Gains/(losses) on fair value investments 

excluding segregated accounts

Gains/(losses) on segregated accounts
Segregated account fees  - annual
Segregated account fees  - performance
Net gains/(losses) on fair value investments 

held in segregated accounts

Gains/(losses) on fair value investments

70.8
47.1
(1.9)
(6.1)

39.1

109.9

2022

7.2

4.3
5.5
2.1
19.1

2022

(579.2)
28.0
(1.7)
(2.6)

23.7

(555.5)

The Company’s Investment Policy involves the allocation of part of 
the portfolio to external fund managers. The vast majority of these 
managers operate funds where the fees are charged within the 
fund. These ‘indirect’ investment management and performance 
fees are therefore automatically reflected within the valuations 
received from the administrators or managers, and form part of 
the investment gains/(losses). At 31 December 2023, three funds 
(31 December 2022: three) were structured as segregated accounts, 
where the managers separately invoice the Company for investment 
management fees. In order to provide a consistent presentation for 
all external fees, these are included within the gains/(losses) on fair 
value investments as shown above. Further details on the typical fee 
structures for the external funds are set out in the Directors’ Report 
on page 61.

4. Operating expenses
£ million

Staff costs:

Wages and salaries
Share-based payment costs (Note 25)
Social security costs
Pension costs (Note 11)

Total staff costs
Auditor’s remuneration (Note 5)
Depreciation
Lease payments
Other operating expenses
Total operating expenses

2023

14.3
14.7
3.9
0.5
33.4
0.4
0.3
0.5
8.1
42.7

2022

13.3
17.6
4.4
0.3
35.6
0.3
0.4
0.4
6.9
43.6

Operating expenses include costs incurred by JRCM in managing 
the Group's assets and property costs from the Group’s property 
portfolio. Further information is provided in Note 6.

The figures include Directors’ emoluments, details of which are 
shown in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 56 to 59.

The average monthly number of employees during the year was 
65 (2022: 59) of which 52 (2022: 47) were employed by JRCM and 
13 (2022: 12) were employed by SHL.

5. Other disclosable expenses
During the year the Group obtained the following services from the 
Company’s auditor and its associates:

£ thousand

2023

2022

Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and 
its associates for the audit of the Parent 
Company and consolidated financial 
statements

Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and 

its associates for other services:

Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries
Audit-related assurance services

Total

278

228

95
9
382

94
12
334

Transaction costs
The following transaction costs represent commissions paid on the 
purchase and sale of listed investments and are included within 
gains/(losses) on fair value investments:

£ million

Purchases
Sales
Transaction costs

2023

0.7
0.6
1.3

2022

1.5
1.2
2.7

Furthermore £0.02 million of professional fees (2022: £0.02 million) 
incurred on purchases of investments are included within gains/
(losses) on fair value investments.

6. Business and geographical segments
For 2023 and 2022, the Group is considered to have three principal 
operating segments, all based in the UK, as follows:

2023 
AUM 
£ million1

2023 
Employees1

2022 
AUM 
£ million2

2022
Employees2

–

–

–

3,573

50

3,722

–

12

–

–

49

13

Segment

Business

RIT
JRCM

SHL

Investment trust
Investment 
management/
administration
Events/premises 
management

1  At 31 December 2023.
2  At 31 December 2022.

74 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

6. Business and geographical segments (continued)
Key financial information for 2023 is as follows:

£ million

£ million

RIT

JRCM
SHL
Adjustments3
Total

Net
assets

3,458.7
120.6
1.3
(7.3)

3,573.3

Income/
gains1

Operating
expenses1

143.0
39.0
4.1
(42.9)

143.2

(45.3)
(36.5)
(3.8)
42.9

(42.7)

Key financial information for 2022 is as follows:

£ million

RIT
JRCM
SHL
Adjustments3
Total

Net
assets

3,617.3
110.3
0.9
(6.8)
3,721.7

Income/
gains1

(511.6)
50.3
3.7
(51.0)
(508.6)

Operating
expenses1

(52.7)
(38.4)
(3.5)
51.0
(43.6)

1  Includes intra-group income and expenses. 
2  Profit before finance costs and taxation. 
3   Consolidation adjustments in accordance with IFRS 10 Consolidated 

Financial Statements. 

7. Finance costs
£ million

Interest on borrowings
Interest on swaps
Other finance costs
Finance costs

8. Taxation

£ million

2023

23.1
11.3
0.0
34.4

2022

14.3
10.4
0.3
25.0

Year ended 31 December 2023

Revenue

Capital

Total

UK corporation tax charge/(credit)
Current tax charge/(credit)
Deferred tax charge/(credit)
Taxation charge/(credit)

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

Profit2

97.7
2.5
0.3
–

100.5

Profit2

(564.3)
11.9
0.2
–
(552.2)

Profit/(loss) before taxation
Tax at the standard 

UK corporation tax rate of 
23.5%
Effect of:

Capital items exempt from 
corporation tax
Dividend income not taxable
Expenses not deductible 
for tax purposes
Tax losses not recognised
Other items

Total taxation charge/(credit)

£ million

Profit/(loss) before taxation
Tax at the standard 

Year ended 31 December 2023

Revenue

(2.9)

Capital

69.0

Total

66.1

(0.7)

16.2

15.5

–
(1.7)

0.1
2.3
–
–

(25.9)
–

–
10.0
(0.3)
–

(25.9)
(1.7)

0.1
12.3
(0.3)
–

Year ended 31 December 2022

Revenue

(14.3)

Capital

(562.9)

Total

(577.2)

UK corporation tax rate of 19%

(2.7)

(107.0)

(109.7)

Effect of:

Capital items exempt from 
corporation tax
Dividend income not taxable
Expenses not deductible 
for tax purposes
Tax losses not recognised
Other items

Total taxation charge/(credit)

–
(1.2)

0.1
3.8
–
–

102.9
–

–
4.8
(0.7)
–

102.9
(1.2)

0.1
8.6
(0.7)
–

Refer to Note 12 on page 78 for the explanation of carried forward 
tax losses.

9.  Earnings per ordinary share –  

basic and diluted

The basic earnings per ordinary share for 2023 is based on the profit 
of £66.1 million (2022: loss of £577.2 million) and the weighted 
average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period of 
149.5 million (2022: 155.5 million). The weighted average number 
of shares is adjusted for shares held in the EBT and in treasury in 
accordance with IAS 33 – Earnings per share.

£ million

UK corporation tax charge/(credit)
Current tax charge/(credit)
Deferred tax charge/(credit)
Taxation charge/(credit)

Year ended 31 December 2022

Revenue

Capital

Total

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

£ million

Net revenue profit/(loss)
Net capital profit/(loss)
Total profit/(loss) for the year

The main corporation tax rate increased from 19% to 25% with 
effect from 1 April 2023. The tax charge for the year differs from the 
effective rate of corporation tax in the UK for 2023 of 23.5% (2022: 
19%). The differences are explained as follows:

Weighted average (million)

Number of shares in issue
Shares held in EBT
Shares held in treasury
Basic shares

2023

(2.9)
69.0
66.1

2023

156.8
(1.8)
(5.5)
149.5

2022

(14.3)
(562.9)
(577.2)

2022

156.8
(1.0)
(0.3)
155.5

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 75

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

9.  Earnings per ordinary share –  
basic and diluted (continued)

pence

Revenue earnings/(loss)  

per ordinary share – basic

Capital earnings/(loss)  

per ordinary share – basic

Total earnings per share – basic

2023

2022

Company 
£ million

(1.9)

(9.2)

46.1
44.2

(362.1)
(371.3)

The diluted earnings per ordinary share for the period is based on the 
basic shares (above) adjusted for the effect of share-based payments 
awards for the period.

This adjustment was not required for 2022 as an increase in the 
shares in issue would have reduced the basic loss per ordinary 
share. As a result, there was no difference between the basic and 
diluted loss per ordinary share in the prior year.

Weighted average (million)

Basic shares
Effect of share-based payment awards
Diluted shares

pence

Revenue earnings/(loss)  

per ordinary share – diluted

Capital earnings/(loss)  

per ordinary share – diluted

Total earnings per ordinary share – diluted

2023

149.5
1.4
150.9

2022

155.5
–
155.5

2023

2022

(1.9)

(9.2)

45.7
43.8

(362.1)
(371.3)

10. Property, plant and equipment
The Group’s property, plant and equipment as at 31 December 2023 
was £21.6 million (2022: £20.7 million).

Group 
£ million

At 1 January 2023

Additions
Charge for depreciation
Revaluation gain/(loss)
Fair value at  
31 December 2023
Of which:
Property – leasehold

Group 
£ million

At 1 January 2022

Additions

Charge for depreciation

Revaluation gain/(loss)

Fair value at  
31 December 2022
Of which:
Property – leasehold

Accumulated 
depreciation Revaluation

Net book/fair 
value

Cost

17.5
0.3
–
–

17.8

(6.2)
–
(0.3)
–

9.4
–
–
0.9

(6.5)

10.3

20.7
0.3
(0.3)
0.9

21.6

19.5

14.1

(4.9)

10.3

Accumulated 
depreciation Revaluation

Net book/fair 
value

(5.8)

–

(0.4)

–

(6.2)

(4.6)

11.5

–

–

(2.1)

9.4

9.4

23.1

0.1

(0.4)

(2.1)

20.7

19.0

Cost

17.4

0.1

–

–

17.5

14.2

76 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

The Company’s property, plant and equipment as at 31 December 
2023 was £21.5 million (2022: £20.6 million).

At 1 January 2023

Additions
Charge for depreciation
Revaluation gain/(loss)
Fair value at 
31 December 2023
Of which:
Property – leasehold

Company 
£ million

At 1 January 2022

Additions

Charge for depreciation

Revaluation gain/(loss)

Fair value at 
31 December 2022
Of which:
Property – leasehold

Accumulated 
depreciation Revaluation

Net book/fair 
value

(4.6)
–
(0.3)
–

9.4
–
–
0.9

(4.9)

10.3

(4.9)

10.3

20.6
0.3
(0.3)
0.9

21.5

19.5

Accumulated 
depreciation Revaluation

Net book/fair 
value

(4.2)

–

(0.4)

–

(4.6)

(4.6)

11.5

–

–

(2.1)

9.4

9.4

23.0

0.1

(0.4)

(2.1)

20.6

18.9

Cost

15.8
0.3
–
–

16.1

14.1

Cost

15.7

0.1

–

–

15.8

14.2

The fair value at both year ends predominantly relates to the 
proportion of the leasehold interest in 27 St. James’s Place occupied 
by the Group. The property valuations are based on Jones Lang 
LaSalle’s (JLL) valuations at the respective year ends. 

11. Pension commitments
The Group has pension commitments in respect of its participation 
in the RITCP Pension and Life Assurance Scheme (the Scheme). The 
Scheme consists of a defined benefit plan which is closed to new 
members. The Scheme is administered under a Trust Deed and Rules 
and a corporate trustee, Law Debenture Pension Trust Corporation plc, 
who is independent of the Group and was appointed in May 2019.

In December 2022, the Group de-risked its retirement benefit 
obligations by supporting the trustees of the Scheme in completing a 
£20 million bulk annuity insurance policy ‘buy-in’. The ‘buy-in’ secured 
an insurance asset that fully matches almost all the remaining 
pension liabilities of the Scheme, with the result that the Group no 
longer bears material investment, longevity, interest rate or inflation 
risk. The annuity policy is held in the name of the Trustee. 

As a result of the ‘buy-in’, current cash contributions into the Scheme 
have ceased. In addition, the Group will no longer record non-cash 
interest income on the accounting surplus. 

It is expected that a full buy-out of the Scheme will complete in 
2024, during which individual insurance policies will be purchased for 
the beneficiaries of the scheme. After the ‘buy-out’ has completed, 
the Group will no longer have any liabilities against the Scheme.

Notes to the Financial Statements

11. Pension commitments (continued)
The costs associated with the Scheme, their recognition in the 
financial statements, the assumptions underlying the calculation 
of those costs and their disclosure in the consolidated income 
statement or SOCI are set out below.

Defined benefit cost 
£ millions

Net interest on defined benefit asset
Remeasurement effects recognised in the 

SOCI

Total cost/(credit)

Recognised in the consolidated income statement 
£ millions

Defined contribution schemes
Defined benefit scheme:

 Net interest on defined benefit liability

Total pension cost recognised in the 
consolidated income statement

Recognised in the SOCI 
£ millions

Defined benefit scheme:
Actuarial loss due to liability experience
Actuarial (gain)/loss due to liability 

assumption changes

Actuarial gain due to demographic 

assumption changes in defined benefit 
obligation (DBO)

Return on Scheme assets greater than 

discount rate

Remeasurement effects recognised in 

the SOCI

Total (credit)/expense

2023

(0.0)

0.4
0.4

2023

0.5

0.0

0.5

2022

(0.1)

4.5
4.4

2022

0.4

(0.1)

0.3

2023

2022

0.0

0.5

0.4

(9.6)

(0.3)

(0.1)

0.2

0.4

0.9

13.8

4.5

4.8

The Scheme’s assets and liabilities are shown below together with 
the actuarial assumptions used.

Changes in the DBO 
£ millions

DBO at end of prior year
Interest cost on the DBO
Actuarial loss - demographic experience
Actuarial gain - demographic assumptions
Actuarial gain - financial assumptions
Benefits paid from scheme assets
Total DBO

Changes in Scheme assets 
£ millions

Opening fair value of the Scheme assets
Interest income on Scheme assets
Return on Scheme assets greater than 

discount rate

Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Total Scheme assets

2023

17.1
0.9
0.0
(0.3)
0.5
(0.9)
17.3

2023

17.6
0.9

(0.2)
–
(0.9)
17.4

2022

26.7
0.5
0.3
–
(9.6)
(0.8)
17.1

2022

30.5
0.6

(13.8)
1.1
(0.8)
17.6

The Company has unrestricted rights to any surplus in the Scheme 
upon wind-up. As such there is no irrecoverable surplus for either the 
current year or prior year.

Development of the net balance sheet position 
£ millions

Net defined benefit asset at end of prior 

year

Net interest on defined benefit asset at end 

of prior year

Remeasurement effects recognised in the 

SOCI

Employer contributions
Net defined benefit asset

2023

2022

0.5

0.0

(0.4)
0.0
0.1

3.8

0.1

(4.5)
1.1
0.5

The assumptions used to determine the measurements at the 
reporting dates are shown below:

Discount rate
Price inflation (RPI)
Rate of salary increase
Pension increases for pre 6 April 1997 

2023

4.65%
3.30%
n/a

2022

4.95%
3.35%
n/a

pension

4.00%

4.00%

Pension increases for post 6 April 1997 

pension

4.20%

4.25%

Pension increases for deferred benefits 
(non Guaranteed Minimum Pension)

Scheme participant census date

Post retirement mortality assumption-

3.30%
31 December 
2023

3.35%
31 December 
2022

source

SAPS1

SAPS1

1   Self-administered Pension Scheme light series year of birth tables allowing 
for Continuous Mortality Investigation projections and a 1.5% per annum 
long-term trend.

Sensitivity analysis
In accordance with IAS 19 (revised), the sensitivity of the DBO to 
the relevant actuarial assumptions is shown below. In each case the 
changed assumption has been considered in isolation (i.e. all other 
factors remain constant).

£ millions

DBO

2023

17.3

2022

17.1

Significant actuarial assumptions at 31 December 2023:

Assumptions
used for
sensitivity  
analysis

Sensitivity
analysis

Revised DBO 
for each
sensitivity

£ millions

Discount rate
Price inflation (RPI)
Life expectancy

4.15% 
3.80% 
–

0.5% point decrease
0.5% point increase
Increase of 1 year

18.5
17.6
18.0

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 77

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments
As an investment company, financial instruments make up the 
vast majority of the Group’s assets and liabilities and generate 
its performance.

Financial instruments comprise securities, derivatives and other 
investments, cash, short-term receivables and payables, and short 
and long-term borrowings.

The nature and extent of the financial instruments outstanding can 
be seen on the face of the balance sheet and the risk management 
policies employed by the Group and Company are set out below.

The Group’s policy for determining the fair value of investments 
(including private investments) is set out on pages 71 and 72. In relation 
to receivables, payables and short-term borrowings, the carrying amount 
is viewed as being a reasonable approximation of fair value.

13.1 Financial risk management
The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are 
market risk (including price risk, interest rate risk and currency risk), 
credit risk and liquidity risk. The day-to-day identification, mitigation 
and monitoring of these risks is undertaken by the Manager under 
the authority of the Board and the Audit and Risk Committee, and is 
described in more detail below.

The objectives, policies and processes for managing risks have not 
changed since the previous accounting year. The risk management 
processes of the Company are aligned with those of the Group 
as a whole and it is at the Group level that the majority of the 
risk management procedures are performed. Where relevant and 
materially different from the Group position, Company-specific risk 
exposures are explained alongside those of the Group.

13.1.1 Market risk
The fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument or 
investment property held by the Group may fluctuate as a result 
of changes in market prices. Market risk can be summarised as 
comprising three types of risk:

•  Price risk

 The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of financial 
instruments and investment properties will fluctuate because of 
changes in market prices (other than those arising from interest 
rate risk or currency risk).

• 

Interest rate risk
 The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of financial 
instruments and investment properties will fluctuate because of 
changes in interest rates.

•  Currency risk

 The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of financial 
instruments will fluctuate because of changes in foreign 
exchange rates.

Revised DBO 
for each
sensitivity

18.3
17.2
17.7

2022

2.2
14.9
17.1

11. Pension commitments (continued)
Significant actuarial assumptions at 31 December 2022:

Assumptions
used for
sensitivity  
analysis

£ millions

Discount rate
Price inflation (RPI)
Life expectancy

4.45% 
3.85% 
–

Sensitivity
analysis

0.5% point decrease
0.5% point increase
Increase of 1 year

The weighted average duration of the DBO is 13 years. Further 
Scheme analysis is shown below.

Analysis of DBO by participant category 
£ millions

Deferred participants
Pensioners
DBO

2023

1.8
15.5
17.3

The fair value of Scheme assets of £17.4 million is analysed in the 
table below (2022: £17.6 million).

Scheme asset breakdown

Bulk insurance policy
Cash and liquidity/other
Total

31 December
2023

31 December
2022

98%
2%
100%

96%
4%
100%

12. Deferred taxation
The gross movement on deferred tax during the year is shown 
below:

£ million

Balance at start of year
(Debit)/credit to consolidated income 

statement

(Debit)/credit to SOCI
Balance at end of year

2023

(0.2)

–
0.2
(0.0)

The deferred tax asset/(liability) is analysed below:

£ million

Retirement benefit asset
Balance at end of year

2023

(0.0)

(0.0)

2022

(1.3)

–
1.1
(0.2)

2022

(0.2)

(0.2)

The Group had carried forward tax losses of £521 million at 
31 December 2023 (2022: £453 million) that have not been 
recognised as a deferred tax asset, as it is considered unlikely that the 
unrecognised asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future.

78 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)
The Group’s exposure to, sensitivity to and management of each of 
these risks are described in further detail below.

Management of market risk is fundamental to the Group’s 
investment objective. The investment portfolio is continually 
monitored to target an appropriate balance of risk and reward.

The Manager may seek to reduce or increase the portfolio’s 
exposure to stock markets, interest rates and currencies by utilising 
derivatives such as index futures, options, swaps and currency 
forward contracts. These instruments are used for the purpose of 
hedging some or all of the existing exposure within the portfolio to 
those currencies or particular markets, as well as to enable increased 
exposure when deemed appropriate. With respect to equity, foreign 
exchange and interest rate options, the notional exposure presented 
in this note is adjusted to reflect the estimated sensitivity of the 
option to movements in the underlying security.

13.1.2 Price risk
Price risk may affect the value of the quoted, private and other 
investments held by the Group.

The Group has a widely diversified investment portfolio which 
significantly reduces the exposure to individual asset price risk. 
The performance of third-party investment managers is regularly 
reviewed and assessed to ensure compliance with their mandates 
and that their performance is compatible with the Group’s 
investment objective.

The Group’s exposure to price risk is monitored and managed by 
analysing the levels of direct exposure from quoted equity price risk 
and the exposure from other price risk. 

The Group’s exposure to quoted equity price risk (also described as 
net quoted equity exposure) can be assumed to be equivalent to the 
quoted equity investments in the investment portfolio adjusted for:

Price risk sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity of the Group’s net assets and profit with regards to 
changes in market prices is illustrated below. This is estimated using 
an assumed 10% increase in general market prices with all other 
variables held constant. A 10% decrease is assumed to produce an 
equal and opposite effect.

The sensitivity analysis takes account of the relevant derivative 
transactions the Group has entered into including those designed to 
provide a hedge against such movements.

£ million

Quoted equity
Other
Total

2023 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

2022 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

230.2
260.4
490.6

137.4
239.4
376.8

The Group is exposed to market risk in respect to the fair value of 
the investment properties. The investment properties are valued by 
JLL using a market valuation approach and as such, the valuation 
will be influenced by trends experienced in the property market and 
also the wider economic environment. In particular, the valuation will 
be dependent on rental income yields, demand and supply for office 
space in London and comparable transactions completed in the 
marketplace. Fluctuations in any of the inputs used by the valuers to 
value the investment properties may increase or decrease the fair 
value of the properties. 

13.1.3 Interest rate risk
The Group finances its operations mainly through its share capital 
and reserves, including realised gains on investments. In addition, 
financing has been obtained through bank borrowings and fixed rate 
loan notes. Changes in interest rates have a direct or indirect impact 
on the fair value or future cash flows of the following financial assets 
and liabilities:

•  Gilts and other government securities;

•  Notional exposure from quoted equity derivatives;

•  Estimated cash balances held by external managers; and

•  Money market funds;

•  Credit funds;

•  Estimated net equity exposure from hedge fund managers.

•  Cash and cash equivalents;

Other price risk exposure relates to investments in private 
investments, absolute return and credit, and real assets, adjusted for 
the notional exposure from commodity and credit derivatives.

£ million
Exposure to quoted equity price risk1

Exposure to other price risk

Total exposure to price risk

31 December 
2023

31 December 
2022

1,594.5

2,332.2
3,926.7

1,361.1

2,394.5
3,755.6

1   Quoted equity price risk represented 45% of year-end net assets 

(2022: 37%).

•  Group borrowings; and

•  Certain derivative contracts.

Changes in interest rates indirectly affect the fair value of the Group’s 
other investments including those in quoted equity securities, private 
investments or property.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 79

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)
Interest rate risk is managed by taking into account the possible 
effects on fair value and cash flows that could arise as a result of 
changes in interest rates when making decisions on investments 
and borrowings.

Exposure of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities to floating 
interest rates (giving cash flow interest rate risk when rates are 
reset) and fixed interest rates (giving fair value risk), is shown below.

£ million

Portfolio investments – 

debt securities1

Cash
Borrowings
Total

£ million

Portfolio investments – 

debt securities1

Cash
Borrowings
Total

31 December 2023

Floating 
rate

–
204.3
(142.9)
61.4

Fixed 
rate

154.0
–
(137.9)
16.1

31 December 2022

Floating 
rate

–
218.0
(236.2)
(18.2)

Fixed 
rate

40.7
–
(134.4)
(93.7)

Total

154.0
204.3
(280.8)
77.5

Total

40.7
218.0
(370.6)
(111.9)

1   In addition, the Group holds £739.8  million (2022: £746.8 million) invested in 
absolute return and credit, of which £394.5 million (2022: £443.7 million) is in 
funds that predominantly invest in credit instruments. These provide indirect 
exposure to interest rate risk.

Exposures vary throughout the year as a consequence of changes 
in the composition of the net assets of the Group arising out of 
investment, borrowing and risk management processes.

Portfolio investments include direct and indirect (via externally-
managed funds) investments in government securities, money 
markets, as well as quoted and unquoted debt securities issued by 
companies.

Interest rate risk sensitivity analysis
The approximate sensitivity of the Group’s net assets and profit in 
regard to changes in interest rates is illustrated below. This is based 
on an assumed 50 basis point annualised increase in prevailing 
interest rates at the balance sheet date applied to the floating rate 
and fixed rate assets and liabilities and the following assumptions:

• 

• 

 the fair values of all other assets and liabilities are not affected by 
a change in interest rates;

  funds will be reinvested in similar interest-bearing securities on 
maturity; and

• 

 all other variables are held constant.

A 50 basis point decrease is assumed to produce an equal and 
opposite impact.

£ million

Total

2023 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

2022 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

2.7

6.1

The Group has direct exposure to the effect of interest rate changes 
on the valuation and cash flows of its interest-bearing assets and 
liabilities. However, it may also be indirectly affected by the impact of 
interest rate changes on the earnings of certain companies in which 
the Group invests, and the impact on valuations that use interest 
rates as an input, including valuation models for private investments. 
Therefore, the sensitivity analysis may not reflect the full effect on 
the Group’s net assets.

13.1.4 Currency risk
Consistent with its Investment Policy, the Group invests in financial 
instruments and transactions denominated in currencies other 
than sterling. As such, the Group’s profit and net assets could be 
significantly affected by currency movements.

Currency risk is managed by the Group by entering into currency 
options or forward currency contracts as a means of limiting or 
increasing its exposure to particular currencies. These contracts are 
used for the purpose of hedging part of the existing currency exposure 
of the Group’s portfolio (as a means of reducing risk) or to enable 
increased exposure when this is deemed appropriate by the Manager.

Interest received on cash and cash equivalents is at prevailing market 
rates.

Foreign currency exposure

The Group has total borrowings with a fair value of £280.8 million 
outstanding at the year end (2022: £370.6 million). The revolving 
credit facilities comprising £142.9 million of this total incur floating 
interest payments (2022: £236.2 million). The loan notes with a fair 
value of £137.9 million (par value of £151.0 million) have fixed interest 
payments (2022: fair value £134.4 million; par value £151.0 million). 
Further details are provided in Note 18.

Currency

US dollar
Euro
Japanese yen
Other non-sterling
Total1

2023 
Net exposure 
% of NAV

2022 
Net exposure 
% of NAV

39.6
6.0
4.4
2.6
52.6

32.5
7.5
4.2
2.9
47.1

1   Amounts in the above table are based on the carrying value of all foreign 
currency denominated assets and liabilities and the underlying notional 
amounts of forward currency contracts. It does not take into account any 
estimates of ‘look-through’ exposure from our fund investments.

80 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)

Currency risk sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity of the Group’s net assets and profit in regard to 
changes in key currencies is illustrated below. This is based on 
an assumed 10% strengthening of sterling relative to the foreign 
currencies as at 31 December 2023, and assumes all other variables 
are held constant. A 10% weakening is assumed to produce an equal 
and opposite effect.

The sensitivity analysis is based on the net foreign currency assets 
held at the balance sheet dates and takes account of currency 
forwards and options that adjust the effects of changes in currency 
exchange rates.

£ million

US dollar
Japanese yen
Euro
Other non-sterling
Total

2023 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

2022 
Impact on profit 
and net assets

(104.8)
(15.9)
(21.5)
(8.9)
(151.1)

(120.8)
(15.6)
(27.8)
(11.2)
(175.4)

13.1.5 Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty to a financial instrument 
held by the Group will fail to discharge an obligation or commitment 
that it has entered into with the Group, which could result in a loss 
to the Group.

This risk is not considered significant and is managed as follows:

• 

• 

• 

• 

 the vast majority of the Group’s listed transactions are settled 
on a delivery versus payment basis and are held directly by the 
custodian in fully segregated client accounts;

 use of a range of brokers and counterparties with their credit 
quality monitored regularly;

 cash balances are predominantly held with our custodian, whose 
credit worthiness is regularly monitored;

 cash margin is held by a range of approved counterparties, with 
both margin balances and counterparties’ creditworthiness 
monitored regularly; and

• 

 careful selection of a diversified portfolio of credit managers.

A credit exposure could arise in respect of derivative contracts 
entered into by the Group if a counterparty was unable to fulfil its 
contractual obligations.

The Group has exposure to certain debt instruments acquired as 
part of its private equity investments. The credit risk associated with 
these instruments is managed as part of the overall investment risk 
in the relevant portfolio companies and is not considered separately.

The Group’s maximum credit exposure is limited to the carrying 
amount of financial assets recognised at the reporting date, 
as summarised below.

Credit risk exposure

£ million
Portfolio investments – debt securities1
Derivative financial instruments2
Cash margin
Other receivables
Cash at bank
Total

2023

154.0
71.3
37.8
33.4
204.3
500.8

2022

40.7
58.3
85.4
159.9
218.0
562.3

1   Debt securities held within portfolio investments include a private loan note 

issued by LionTree Advisory Holdings LLC.

2  Represents the fair value of assets held by counterparties.

The credit quality of certain financial assets that are not past due, 
where the risk of loss is primarily that a counterparty fails to meet an 
obligation, can be assessed by reference to external credit ratings.

The Manager has a review process in place that includes an 
evaluation of a potential counterparty’s ability to service and repay its 
debt. This is considered on a regular basis. Cash margins and other 
receivables comprise mainly balances with counterparties which are 
investment grade financial institutions with a short-term credit rating 
by S&P of A-2 or higher (2022: A-2).

BNP is the custodian and depositary to the Company under the 
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). Under 
the UK equivalent regulations, the Company is the Alternative 
Investment Fund (AIF) and JRCM is the Alternative Investment Fund 
Manager (AIFM). As custodian, substantially all of the Company’s 
directly-held listed portfolio investments and cash at bank are held 
by BNP. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the custodian may cause the 
Group’s rights with respect to securities held by the custodian to 
be delayed; however, the custodian’s local long-term rating from 
S&P was A+ in the most recent rating prior to 31 December 2023 
(2022: A+).

As depositary under AIFMD, the main obligation of BNP is the 
safeguarding of those custodied assets on behalf of the RIT 
shareholder. The depositary is liable for the loss of financial 
instruments held in custody, other than under limited circumstances. 
As a result of this obligation, the depositary maintains oversight of 
all transactions undertaken by the AIFM (JRCM) on behalf of the AIF 
(RIT). This includes reviewing all cash movements, receiving copies 
of internal sign‐off documentation and key legal agreements, and 
oversight and review of key procedures and controls.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 81

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

£ million

Current liabilities:

    Bank loan/overdraft
    Derivative financial 

instruments

Non-current liabilities:

    Derivative financial 

instruments
    Borrowings
    Lease liability
Financial liabilities
Other non-financial liabilities
Total

31 December 2022

3 months 
or less

3-12 
months

>1 year

Total

236.2

7.0

–
–
–
243.2
63.5
306.7

–

3.4

–
5.6
0.4
9.4
–
9.4

–

–

–
189.3
5.9
195.2
1.8
197.0

236.2

10.4

–
194.9
6.3
447.8
65.3
513.1

In addition, the Company has contingent liabilities in the form of 
commitments amounting to £307 million (2022: £385 million) as set 
out in Note 14.

13.2 Collateral
Collateral in the form of cash margin is posted by the Group in 
relation to certain derivative transactions, transacted under the 
auspices of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. 
The Group does not hold collateral from other counterparties.

Set out below is the amount of financial assets pledged as collateral 
at the year end.

£ million

Cash margin 

2023

37.8

2022

85.4

13.3 Derivative financial instruments
The Group typically uses the following types of derivative 
instruments in the portfolio:

• 

• 

• 

 futures and forward contracts relating to market indices, foreign 
currencies and government bonds;

 options relating to foreign currencies, market indices, stocks and 
interest rates; and

 swaps relating to interest rates, bonds, credit spreads, equity 
indices and stocks.

As explained above, the Manager uses derivatives to hedge various 
exposures and also selectively to increase or decrease exposure 
where desired. The notional amount of certain types of derivatives 
provides a basis for comparison with instruments recognised on 
the balance sheet, but does not necessarily indicate the amount of 
future cash flows involved or the current fair value of the derivatives.

13. Financial instruments (continued)

13.1.6 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will have difficulty in meeting 
its obligations in respect of financial liabilities as they fall due.

In addition to the Group’s liquidity balances and committed but 
undrawn borrowings, the investment portfolio includes a substantial 
amount of assets which would be expected to be realised within 
a relatively short time frame, depending on market conditions. 
This might include stocks (unless held via a co-investment fund 
or subject to a lock-up), government bonds and derivatives. Other 
investments can be realised over varying timeframes depending 
on the nature of the investment and/or the legal terms governing 
disposal. Investments in externally-managed equity and hedge 
funds have redemption periods which typically range from daily to 
quarterly and longer, depending in part on the underlying nature of 
the portfolio holdings. There is also a risk in stress situations of the 
funds imposing additional restrictions or ‘gates’ on redemptions (as 
happened in particular to hedge funds during the global financial 
crisis). Direct private and private fund investments are inherently less 
liquid, and while there is a secondary market, participants will often 
experience discounts to fair value, in particular at times of stress.

JRCM manages the Group’s liquid resources in line with a 
liquidity risk framework overseen by the Board. This establishes a 
minimum level of liquidity available to meet expected contractual 
commitments, including ongoing costs, margin calls and capital calls 
(from funds with a commitment/drawdown structure  - see Note 14). 
The Manager monitors the level of short-term funding, and balances 
the need for access to short-term funding, with the long-term 
funding needs of the Group. 

The Group has two revolving credit facilities with a total capacity of 
£185 million (of which £40 million was committed and undrawn at 
the year end) and £151 million par value long-term loan notes (details 
of which are disclosed in Note 18).

The remaining contractual maturities of the Group’s financial liabilities 
at the year end, based on the earliest date on which payment could 
be required are as follows:

£ million

Current liabilities:

    Bank loan/overdraft
    Derivative financial 

instruments

Amounts owed to group 

undertakings

Non-current liabilities:
    Derivative financial 

instruments
    Borrowings
    Lease liability
Financial liabilities
Other non-financial liabilities
Total

31 December 2023

3 months 
or less

3-12 
months

>1 year

Total

142.9

2.5

0.1

0.0
–
0.1
145.6
39.2
184.8

–

0.3

–

–
5.6
0.3
6.2
–
6.2

–

–

–

–
189.3
8.0
197.3
3.0
200.3

142.9

2.8

0.1

0.0
194.9
8.4
349.1
42.2
391.3

82 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)
The derivative instruments become favourable (assets) or 
unfavourable (liabilities) as a result of fluctuations in indices, security 
prices, market interest rates or foreign exchange rates relevant to 
the terms of the derivative instrument. The aggregate contractual or 
notional amount of derivative financial instruments held, the extent 
to which instruments are favourable or unfavourable and thus the 
aggregate fair values of derivative financial assets and liabilities can 
fluctuate significantly from time to time.

Details of the unsettled derivatives at 31 December 2023 and 
31 December 2022 are:

As at 31 December 2023 
£ million

Commodity derivatives
Currency derivatives
Equity derivatives
Total

As at 31 December 2022 
£ million

Commodity derivatives
Currency derivatives
Equity derivatives
Total

Notional1
amount

233.5
1,406.8
415.9

Notional1
amount

169.1
1,815.1
253.2

Group and Company

Assets
(positive 
fair value)

Liabilities
(negative
fair value)

6.0
32.6
32.7
71.3

(1.8)
(0.7)
(0.3)
(2.8)

Group and Company

Assets
(positive 
fair value)

Liabilities
(negative
fair value)

6.4
49.6
2.3
58.3

–
(7.0)
(3.4)
(10.4)

Total
fair value

4.2
31.9
32.4
68.5

Total
fair value

6.4
42.6
(1.1)
47.9

1  Long and short notional exposure has been netted.

13.4 IFRS 13 fair value measurement classification
IFRS 13 requires the Group to classify its financial instruments held 
at fair value using a hierarchy that reflects the significance of the 
inputs used in the valuation methodologies. These are as follows:

• 

• 

 Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical 
assets or liabilities;

 Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as 
prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and

• 

 Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on 
observable market data (i.e. unobservable inputs).

The vast majority of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities, 
investment properties and property, plant and equipment are 
measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The Group’s policy is to recognise transfers into and transfers out of 
fair value hierarchy levels at the end of the reporting year when they 
are deemed to occur.

A description of the valuation techniques used by the Group with 
regards to investments categorised in each level of the fair value 
hierarchy is detailed below. Where the Group invests in a fund or 
a partnership, which is not itself listed on an active market, the 
categorisation of such investments between levels 2 and 3 is 
determined by reference to the nature of the fund or partnership’s 

underlying investments. If such investments are categorised across 
different levels, the lowest level of the hierarchy that forms a 
significant proportion of the fund or partnership exposure is used to 
determine the reporting disclosure.

If the proportion of the underlying investments categorised between 
levels changes during the period, these will be reclassified to the 
most appropriate level.

Level 1
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is 
based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market 
is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly 
available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing 
service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and 
regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. 
The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group 
is the current bid price or the last traded price, depending on the 
convention of the exchange on which the investment is quoted. 
Where a market price is available but the market is not considered 
active, the Group has classified these investments as level 2.

Level 2
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active 
market is determined by using valuation techniques which maximise 
the use of observable market data where it is available. Specific 
valuation techniques used to value OTC derivatives include quoted 
market prices for similar instruments, counterparty quotes and the 
use of forward exchange rates to estimate the fair value of forward 
foreign exchange contracts at the balance sheet date. Investments 
in externally-managed funds which themselves invest primarily in 
listed securities are valued at the price or net asset value released 
by the investment manager or fund administrator as at the balance 
sheet date.

Level 3
The Group considers all private investments, whether direct or funds, 
(as described in the Investment Portfolio on page 22) as level 3 
assets, as the valuations of these assets are not typically based on 
observable market data. Where other funds invest into illiquid stocks, 
these are also considered by the Group to be level 3 assets.

Private fund investments are held at the most recent fair values 
provided by the GPs managing those funds, adjusted for subsequent 
investments, distributions, and currency movements up to the period 
end, and are subject to periodic review by the Manager. 

Direct co-investments are also held at the most recent fair values 
provided by the GPs managing those co-investments, adjusted for 
subsequent investments, distributions, currency moves, as well 
as pricing events where the Manager has sufficient information to 
suggest the period-end valuation should be adjusted. The remaining 
directly-held private investments are valued on a semi-annual basis 
using techniques including a market approach, income approach 
and/or cost approach. The valuation process involves the investment 
functions of the Manager who prepare the initial valuations, which 
are then subject to review by the finance function, with the final 
valuations being determined by the Valuation Committee, comprised 
of independent non-executive Directors, of which the Audit and Risk 
Committee Chair is also a member.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 83

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)
Specific valuation techniques used will typically include the value 
of recent transactions, earnings multiples, discounted cash flow 
analysis, and, where appropriate, industry specific methodologies. 
The acquisition cost, if determined to be fair value, may be used 
to calibrate inputs to the valuation. The valuations will often reflect 
a synthesis of a number of distinct approaches in determining the 
final fair value estimate. The individual approach for each investment 
will vary depending on relevant factors that a market participant 
would take into account in pricing the asset. These might include the 
specific industry dynamics, the company’s stage of development, 
profitability, growth prospects or risk as well as the rights associated 
with the particular security.

Borrowings at 31 December 2023 comprise bank loans and senior 
loan notes. The bank loans are revolving credit facilities paying 
floating interest, and are typically drawn in tranches with a duration 
of three or six months. The loans are therefore short-term in nature, 
and their fair value approximates their nominal value. The loan 
notes were issued in 2015 with tenors of between 10 and 20 years 
with a weighted average of 16 years. They are valued on a monthly 
basis using a discounted cash flow model where the discount rate 
is derived from the yield of similar tenor UK Government bonds, 
adjusted for any significant changes in either credit spreads or the 
perceived credit risk of the Company.

The fair value of investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries is 
considered to be the net asset value of the individual subsidiary as 
at the balance sheet date. The net asset value comprises various 
assets and liabilities which are fair valued on a recurring basis and is 
considered to be level 3. 

On a semi-annual basis, the Group engages external, independent 
and qualified valuers to determine the fair value of the Group’s 
investment properties and property, plant and equipment held at fair 
value. Further information is shown in Notes 10 and 15.

The following table analyses the Group’s assets and liabilities within 
the fair value hierarchy, at 31 December 2023:

As at 31 December 2023

£ million

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Financial assets at fair value 

through profit or loss (FVPL):

  Portfolio investments
  Non-consolidated subsidiaries
Investments held at fair value
Derivative financial instruments
Total financial assets at FVPL
Non-financial assets measured 

at fair value:
Investment property
  Property, plant and 

equipment

Total non-financial assets 
measured at fair value
Financial liabilities at FVPL:
  Borrowings
  Derivative financial 

668.4  1,065.8
–
1,065.8
62.6
1,128.4

–
668.4
8.7
677.1

1,628.1
137.1
1,765.2
–
1,765.2

3,362.3
137.1
3,499.4
71.3
3,570.7

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

34.1

34.1

21.6

21.6

55.7

55.7

(280.8)

(280.8)

instruments

(1.8)

(1.0)

–

(2.8)

Total financial liabilities at 

FVPL

(1.8)

(1.0)

(280.8)

(283.6)

Total net assets measured at 

fair value

675.3

1,127.4

1,540.1

Other non-current assets
Cash at bank
Other current assets
Other current liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Net assets

3,342.8
0.1
204.3
71.3
(39.3)
(5.9)
3,573.3

84 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)

Movements in level 3 assets

Year ended 31 December 2023
£ million

Opening balance
Purchases
Sales
Gains/(losses) through profit or loss1
Unrealised gains/(losses) through 
other comprehensive income

Other
Closing balance

Investments 
held at fair 
value

1,875.3
187.2
(159.0)
(143.2)

–
4.9
1,765.2

Properties

Total

58.6
–
–
(2.9)

0.3
(0.3)
55.7

1,933.9
187.2
(159.0)
(146.1)

0.3
4.6
1,820.9

1  Included within gains/(losses) through profit or loss is £23.3 million (2022: 

£60.1 million loss) of unrealised losses, including currency translation, relating 
to those level 3 assets held at the end of the reporting period. 

assessed by reference to similar listed companies or transactions 
involving similar companies. When an asset is undergoing a sale 
and the price has been agreed but not yet completed or an offer has 
been submitted, the agreed or offered price will be used, often with 
a discount as appropriate to reflect the risks associated with the 
transaction completing or any price adjustments. Where a company 
has been the subject of a recent financing round which is viewed as 
representative of fair value, this transaction price will be used. Other 
methods employed include discounted cash flow analysis and industry 
metrics such as multiples of assets under management or revenue, 
where market participants use these approaches in pricing assets. 

The following table provides a sensitivity analysis of the valuation of 
directly-held private investments, and the impact on net assets:

Valuation method/approach

Sensitivity analysis

Third-party valuations

During the year no investments were reclassified between level 2 
and level 3.

Recent transaction

Level 3 assets
Further information in relation to the directly-held private investments 
is set out in the following table. This summarises the portfolio by the 
primary method used in estimating the fair value of the investment. 
As a range of valuation methods and inputs may be used in the 
valuation process, selection of a primary method is subjective, and 
designed primarily to assist the subsequent sensitivity analysis.

Primary valuation method/approach  
£ million 
Third-party valuations1
Recent transaction
Other industry metrics
Discount to recent transaction2
Discount to sale proceeds 
Earnings multiple
Total

2023

259.7
60.0
28.9
22.3
13.3
7.5
391.7

2022

246.3
23.6
21.7
90.5
10.8
49.8
442.7

1   Included in this method are directly-held private investments within 
the non-consolidated subsidiaries with a total of £25.1 million (2022: 
£24.5 million).

2   Included in this method are direct private investments which have been 
discounted due to a decline in public comparables or a general decline in 
markets related to or impacting the businesses.

The majority of the direct private investments are structured 
as co-investments, managed by a GP. For these investments, 
the valuation approach is to typically use the latest quarterly 
fair valuations provided by the GP, adjusted for any subsequent 
investments/distributions and currency moves as well as pricing 
events, where there is sufficient information to suggest the period-
end valuation should be adjusted.

Where the Manager has sufficient information to undertake its own 
valuation, a range of methods will typically be used. For companies 
with positive earnings, this will usually involve an earnings multiple 
approach, typically using EBITDA or similar. The earnings multiple is 

A 5% change in the value of these 
assets would result in a £13.0 million or 
0.4% (2022: £12.3 million, 0.3%) change 
in net assets.
A 5% change in the value of these 
assets would result in a £3.0 million 
or 0.08% (2022: £1.2 million, 0.03%) 
change in net assets.
A 5% change in the value of these 
assets would result in a £1.4 million 
or 0.04% (2022: £1.1 million, 0.03%) 
change in net assets.

Other industry metrics

Discount to recent transaction Assets in this category are valued 

using a discount applied to a recent 
financing round or secondary transaction. 
Discounts range between 9% and 67%, 
reflecting factors such as the elapsed 
time since the transaction and the 
movement in prices of broadly similar 
listed companies. A 5% change to the 
discount would result in a £1.1 million 
or 0.03% (2022: £4.5 million, 0.12%) 
change in net assets.
The asset in this category is valued using 
a 15% discount to an agreed offer. A 5% 
change in the discount would result in 
a £0.03 million or <0.001% (2022: £0.1 
million, <0.01%) change in net assets.
Assets in this category are valued 
using EV/sales multiples in the range 
of 2.0x to 5.2x.If the multiple used 
for valuation purposes is increased or 
decreased by 5% then the net assets 
would increase/decrease by £0.5 million or 
0.02% (2022: £2.5 million, 0.07%).

Discount to sale proceeds

Earnings multiple

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 85

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)
The investment property and property, plant and equipment with 
an aggregate fair value of £55.7 million (2022: £58.6 million) were 
valued using a third-party valuation provided by JLL. The properties 
were valued using weighted average capital values of £1,499 per 
square foot (2022: £1,580) developed from rental yields and 
supported by market transactions. A £25 per square foot increase/
decrease in capital values would result in a £0.8 million increase/
decrease in fair value (2022: £0.8 million increase/decrease).

The non-consolidated subsidiaries are held at their fair value of 
£137.1 million (2022: £101.1 million) representing £138.1 million 
of portfolio investments (2022: £104.7 million) and £1.0 million 
of remaining liabilities (2022: £3.3 million of remaining liabilities). 
A 5% change in the value of these assets would result in £6.9 million 
or 0.2% (2022: £5.1 million, 0.1%) change in total net assets.

The remaining investments held at fair value and classified as level 3 of 
£1,261.5 million (2022: £1,355.7 million) were valued using third-party 
valuations from a GP, administrator or fund manager. A 5% change 
in the value of these assets would result in a £63.1 million or 1.77% 
(2022: £67.8 million, 1.82%) change in net assets.

In aggregate, the sum of the direct private investments, investment 
property, property, plant and equipment, non-consolidated 
subsidiaries and the remaining fund investments represents the total 
level 3 assets of £1,820.9 million (2022: £1,933.9 million).

The following table analyses the Group’s assets and liabilities within 
the fair value hierarchy, at 31 December 2022:

As at 31 December 2022

£ million

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Financial assets at fair value 

through profit or loss (FVPL):

  Portfolio investments
  Non-consolidated subsidiaries
Investments held at fair value
Derivative financial instruments
Total financial assets at FVPL
Non-financial assets measured 

at fair value:
Investment property
  Property, plant and 

equipment

Total non-financial assets 
measured at fair value
Financial liabilities at FVPL:
  Borrowings
  Derivative financial 

instruments

Total financial liabilities at 

FVPL

506.8
–
506.8
6.4
513.2

1,204.2
–
1,204.2
51.9
1,256.1

1,774.2
101.1
1,875.3
–
1,875.3

3,485.2
101.1
3,586.3
58.3
3,644.6

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

37.9

37.9

20.7

20.7

58.6

58.6

(370.6)

(370.6)

(10.4)

–

(10.4)

(10.4)

(370.6)

(381.0)

Total net assets measured at 

fair value

513.2

1,245.7

1,563.3

Other non-current assets
Cash at bank
Other current assets
Other current liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Net assets

Movements in level 3 assets

Year ended 31 December 2022 
£ million

Opening balance
Purchases
Sales
Gains/(losses) through profit or 

3,322.2
0.5
218.0
249.8
(63.6)
(5.2)
3,721.7

Investments 
held at fair 
value

1,914.3
222.2
(210.3)

Properties

Total

61.4
0.1
–

1,975.7
222.3
(210.3)

loss

(51.0)

(0.4)

(51.4)

Unrealised gains/(losses) through 
other comprehensive income

Transfer in to level 3
Transfer out of level 3
Other
Closing balance

–
–
–
0.1
1,875.3

(2.1)
–
–
(0.4)
58.6

(2.1)
–
–
(0.3)
1,933.9

86 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements

13. Financial instruments (continued)

13.5 Capital management
The Group’s primary objectives in relation to the management of 
capital are:

• 

• 

 to deliver long-term capital growth for its shareholders, while 
preserving shareholders’ capital;

 to deliver for shareholders increases in capital value in excess of 
the relevant indices over time through an appropriate balance of 
equity capital and gearing; and

15. Investment property
The Group and Company’s investment property as at 31 December 
2023 was £34.1 million (2022: £37.9 million).

£ million 

Rental income from investment 

properties

Direct operating expenses arising from 
investment properties that generated 
rental income during the year

2023

1.8

(1.5)

(0.5)

2022

2.1

(1.4)

(0.4)

• 

 to ensure the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Cash outflow from leases

The Group and Company is committed to making the following 
payments under non-cancellable leases over the periods described.

£ million 

Within one year

2023

0.4

2022

0.4

Under non-cancellable leases the Group and Company will receive 
the following:

£ million 

Within one year

Between one and two years

Between two and three years

Between three and four years

Between four and five years

Over five years

2023

2022

0.6

0.3

0.1

0.0

–

–

1.1

0.6

0.1

0.1

–

–

All investment properties held by the Group during the year 
generated rental income.

The Company leases Spencer House from the Spencer Trustees (the 
Trustees). The terms of this lease include provisions such that: any 
assignment or sale of the lease can occur only with the consent 
of the Trustees, there are limits on event frequency and that the 
Trustees retain certain (de minimis) usage rights over the ‘fine rooms’. 
The Company is required to externally redecorate every three years 
and to internally redecorate every seven years. The property is typically 
open to the public for viewing every Sunday, except during August. 
The investment property portfolio is valued by JLL on a six-monthly 
basis in accordance with current RICS Valuation – Global Standards, 
published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, on the basis 
of open market value. The most recent valuation, which reflects the 
factors highlighted above, was undertaken as at 31 December 2023.

The Company is subject to externally imposed capital requirements:

• 

• 

 the Company’s Articles of Association restrict borrowings to a 
maximum of five times share capital and reserves; and

 the Company’s borrowings are subject to covenants limiting 
the total exposure based on a minimum net assets and a cap of 
borrowings as a percentage of adjusted net assets.

All these conditions were met during this year and the previous 
financial year.

In addition, JRCM is subject to capital requirements imposed by 
the FCA and must ensure that it has sufficient capital to meet these 
requirements. JRCM was compliant with those capital requirements 
throughout the year.

The Group’s capital at 31 December 2023 and 31 December 2022 
comprised:

£ million 

Equity share capital
Retained earnings and other reserves
Net asset value
Borrowings
Total capital

2023

156.8
3,416.5
3,573.3
280.8
3,854.1

2022

156.8
3,564.9
3,721.7
370.6
4,092.3

There have been no significant changes to the Group’s capital 
management objectives, policies and processes in the year, nor has 
there been any change in what the Group considers to be its capital.

14. Financial commitments
Financial commitments to invest additional funds which have not 
been provided for are as follows:

£ million

Commitments

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

307.1

307.1

385.0

385.0

The financial commitments are principally uncalled commitments to 
private funds, typically established as 10-year funds with a five-year 
investment period, are diversified across multiple funds and vintage 
years, and may be called, with customary notice, at any time during 
the investment period. The majority are denominated in US dollars 
and therefore subject to currency fluctuation.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 87

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

16. Other receivables

£ million

Group

Company

Group

Company

£ million

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

Cash margin
Amounts receivable 
Prepayments and accrued 

income

Sales for future settlement
Total

37.8
1.2

4.2
28.0
71.2

37.8
1.2

3.6
28.0
70.6

85.4
0.6

7.0
152.3
245.3

85.4
0.6

6.6
152.3
244.9

The carrying amount of other receivables approximates their fair 
value, due to their short-term nature.

17. Related party transactions
In the normal course of its business, the Group has entered into a 
number of transactions with related parties. All arrangements with 
related parties are monitored by the Conflicts Committee, which is 
comprised solely of independent non-executive Directors.

Transactions with Hannah Rothschild or parties related to her
During the current and prior year the Group transacted with entities 
classified as related to Hannah Rothschild as a result of her having 
significant influence over them, a beneficial interest in them, 
or otherwise in accordance with IAS 24 – Related Party Disclosures 
(IAS 24).

The Group had arrangements with these related parties covering the 
provision and receipt of administrative, support and supply services. 
Under these arrangements the Group received £72,193 (2022: 
£61,757) and paid £94,257 (2022: £74,077).

Certain of these related parties occupy office space in St. James’s 
Place which is owned or leased by the Group. The rent, rates and 
services charged by the Group for the year ended 31 December 
2023 amounted to £186,232 (2022: £203,539).

Nothing was owed by the Group to the parties related to Hannah 
Rothschild at either 31 December 2023 or 31 December 2022. 
The balance due to the Group from these related parties at 
31 December 2023 was £12,303 (2022: £11,693).

Other
No subscriptions were made to its associate, JRCM (London) LLP 
in the year (2022: Company £nil; JRCM management £nil) and the 
Company has a remaining commitment of £50,000 (2022: £50,000).

Group undertakings
JRCM acts as the Company’s manager, administrator and corporate 
secretary. During the year ended 31 December 2023, the charge 
for these services from JRCM to the Company amounted to 
£42.6 million (2022: £49.7 million). JRCM incurred rent charges of 
£580,000 (2022: £580,000) from the Company. During the year SHL 
(also a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) earned property 
management revenues of £89,191 from JRCM (2022: £98,827) and 
£1,830,681 from the Company (2022: £1,597,394).

Amounts due from subsidiaries and to subsidiaries are disclosed on 
the face of the Group’s balance sheet. The balances outstanding at 
the year ends are show below:

88 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

RIT Investments US, Inc
RIT Investments GP Limited
J. Rothschild Capital Management US, Inc
Total

£ million

RIT Investments US, Inc
JRCM
J. Rothschild Capital Management US, Inc
Total

Amounts owed by/(to) 
Group undertakings

2023

2022

0.0
(0.1)
0.1
0.0

4.5
(0.1)
0.0
4.4

Amounts owed by/(to) 
Company undertakings

2023

0.0
(119.7)
0.1
(119.6)

2022

4.5
(94.7)
0.0
(90.2)

RITCP Pension and Life Assurance Scheme
The Group’s pension scheme is deemed to be a related party of the 
Company pursuant to IAS 24. Details of the pension contributions 
made during the year are disclosed in Note 11. There was £48,894 
owing to the pension scheme by the Company at 31 December 2023 
(31 December 2022: £nil). Nothing was owed by the Group’s pension 
scheme to the Company at 31 December 2023 (31 December 2022: 
£nil).

Directors and key management personnel
Details of the remuneration and benefits attributable to Directors and 
key management personnel are set out below.

£ million

Short-term employee benefits
Share-based payment
Social security costs
Total

The Group has no ultimate controlling party.

18. Borrowings

£ million

Unsecured loans payable within one year:

    Revolving credit facilities
Unsecured loans payable in more than one year:
    Fixed rate loan notes
Total borrowings

2023

4.2
11.5
2.3
18.0

2022

3.6
14.0
2.5
20.1

Group and Company

2023

2022

142.9

236.2

137.9
280.8

134.4
370.6

At 31 December 2023 the Company had two revolving credit facilities 
(RCFs): an £85 million, three-year facility with BNP Paribas SA agreed 
in December 2022 and a £100 million three-year facility with Industrial 
and Commercial Bank of China agreed in December 2022. These 
are flexible as to currency, duration and number of drawdowns, and 
pay floating interest linked to SONIA, SOFR or equivalent relevant to 
the period and currency drawn. As they are drawn in tranches with 
tenors less than one year they are classified as current liabilities. The 
fair value and par value of the drawn borrowings at the year end was 
£142.9 million (2022: £236.2 million). A change in interest rates is not 
expected to have a significant impact on the fair value of the RCFs. No 
bank loans are held within subsidiaries. The weighted average interest 
rate on drawn down RCFs at the year end was 7.28% (2022: 5.85%). 

Notes to the Financial Statements

18. Borrowings (continued)
On 1 June 2015 the Company issued £151.0 million of fixed rate 
loan notes with tenors between 10 and 20 years and coupons from 
3.00% to 3.56%. These Notes are held at fair value and pay interest 
on a semi-annual basis. The fair value of this debt at the end of the 
year was £137.9 million (2022: £134.4 million) calculated using a 
discount rate of 5.13% (2022: 5.24%). A 5% increase/decrease in 
the underlying discount rate would result in an increase/decrease 
in net assets of approximately £2.0 million (2022: £2.3 million) or 
0.06% (2022: 0.06%). The weighted average interest rate payable on 
these Notes is 3.45% and their remaining weighted average tenor is 
7.2 years (2022: 8.2 years). 

The overall weighted average interest rate on drawn borrowings at 
the year end was 5.32% (2022: 4.93%).

21. Share capital

£ million

Allotted, issued and fully paid:
At 1 January

At 31 December

2023
Nominal 
value of 
total shares 
in issue

2022
Nominal 
value of 
total shares 
in issue

Shares in
 issue

156,848,065

156,848,065

156.8

156.8

156.8

156.8

The Company has one class of ordinary shares which carry no right 
to fixed income. The share capital is not distributable.

In 2023, 8,617,954 shares were bought back at a cost of £163.1 million 
and held in treasury (2022: 514,634 shares at a cost of £11.0 million) 
meaning at 31 December 2023, 9,307,817 shares were held in treasury 
(2022: 689,863 shares).

19. Other payables

£ million

Accruals 
Other creditors

Purchases for future 

settlement

Total

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

22. Share premium
£ million

15.2

21.3

2.7
39.2

8.3

20.9

2.7
31.9

14.5

24.9

24.1
63.5

5.3

24.7

24.1
54.1

At 1 January

At 31 December

The share premium is not distributable.

The carrying value of the Group’s other payables approximates their 
fair value, due to their short-term nature.

23. Capital redemption reserve
£ million

Balance at start of year

At 31 December

2023

45.7

45.7

2022

45.7

45.7

2023

36.3

36.3

2022

36.3

36.3

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

The capital redemption reserve is not distributable and represents 
the cumulative nominal value of shares cancelled.

20. Provisions

£ million

Opening balance
Additional provision

Amounts utilised

Foreign exchange 
movements

Total

1.8

1.7

(0.4)

(0.1)
3.0

2.2

1.3

(0.4)

(0.1)
3.0

1.1

1.0

(0.4)

0.1
1.8

1.1

1.4

(0.4)

0.1
2.2

As at 31 December 2023 there are no provisions in respect of 
investments which are expected to settle within the next 12 months (as 
at 31 December 2022: £nil). It is anticipated that provisions noted above 
will be settled more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Indemnity provision
The provision above relates to an indemnity provided by the 
Company in 1991 when it profitably disposed its indirect interest in 
Cavenham Forest Industries (CFI). The sellers (including the Company) 
indemnified the purchasers of CFI against certain ongoing costs being 
incurred by CFI. The indemnity provision has been estimated based 
on the net present value of the Company’s share of the projected 
indemnified costs.

24. Own shares reserve
£ million

Opening cost
Own shares acquired

Own shares transferred
Closing cost

2023

(46.3)

(9.8)
19.4
(36.7)

2022

(23.0)

(40.4)
17.1
(46.3)

The Group has established an Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) 
which purchases shares in order to meet the anticipated value of 
equity-settled, share-based awards. At the year end, the EBT held 
1,611,339 shares with a cost of £36.7 million and market value of 
£30.3 million (2022: 1,988,580 shares, cost £46.3 million, market 
value £42.3 million). The own shares reserve is not distributable.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 89

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Notes to the Financial Statements

25. Share-based payments
The Group utilises share-based awards for employees, the vast majority of 
which are equity-settled, and designed to align the interests of employees 
with those of shareholders.

Restricted share units (RSUs) were awarded to employees during the 
year. These are widely used long-term incentive awards that comprise 
awards of shares made to employees that will vest after a three-year 
service period and then are typically subject to a further two-year 
holding period or lock-up. There are also a small number of legacy share 
appreciation rights (SARs) remaining. These are no longer awarded to 
employees since the conversion to RSUs was made in 2021.

In addition, 60% of annual bonuses over £250,000 are made in deferred 
shares which vest over three years (based on a service condition).

The total expense for share-based awards is based on the fixed, initial fair 
value at the time the award is made. The ultimate impact on the net asset 
value is the cost of the shares acquired by the EBT and then transferred 
to employees if and when they vest. For 2023, the cost recognised in the 
income statement (excluding national insurance) for share-based awards 
was £14.7 million (2022: £17.6 million) of which £8.7 million relates to 
RSUs and £6.0 million to deferred shares.

The movement in share-based awards is as follows:

Number (thousand)

2023

2022

Share-based awards with service conditions attached (deferred 
shares and RSUs) were valued using the prevailing market price and 
a lock-up discount factor as applicable.

26. Capital reserve

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

£ million

Group

Company

Group

Company

Balance at start of year

Gains/(loss) for the year
Dividend paid
Other capital items
Taxation
Total capital return
Balance at end of year

3,548.9
110.7
(56.7)
(209.8)
–
(155.8)
3,393.1

3,578.6
110.7
(56.7)
(196.8)
–
(142.8)
3,435.8

4,174.4
(535.3)
(57.6)
(32.6)
–
(625.5)
3,548.9

4,203.4
(535.3)
(57.6)
(31.9)
–
(624.8)
3,578.6

The Company’s Articles of Association allow distribution by dividends 
of realised capital reserves.

£ million

Capital reserve:

    in respect of investments realised
    in respect of investments held
Balance at end of year

2023

2022

2,557.3
878.5
3,435.8

2,542.3
1,036.3
3,578.6

Outstanding at the start of the year:
    SARs

    RSUs

    Deferred shares

    Total

Granted during the year:
    RSUs
    Deferred shares
    Total
Exercised/vested during the year:
    SARs
    RSUs
    Deferred shares
    Total
Lapsed/forfeited during the year:
    SARs
    RSUs
    Deferred shares
    Total
Outstanding at the end of the year:
    SARs
    RSUs
    Deferred shares
    Total
SARs exercisable at year end
Intrinsic value of SARs exercisable at year end 

315

1,483

988

2,786

342

1,397

841

2,580

424
91
515

–
(377)
(452)
(829)

(206)
(330)
–
(536)

352
553
905

(3)
(256)
(406)
(665)

(24)
(10)
–
(34)

27. Revenue reserve

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

£ million

Group

Company

Group

Company

Balance at start of year

Loss for the year
Actuarial gain/(loss)
Deferred tax (charge)/credit
Balance at end of year

(29.1)
(2.9)
(0.4)
0.2
(32.2)

(209.5)
(16.7)
–
–
(226.2)

(11.4)
(14.3)
(4.5)
1.1
(29.1)

(176.1)
(33.4)
–
–
(209.5)

As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the 
Company has not published a separate income statement or 
statement of comprehensive income. The Company’s revenue 
loss after tax amounted to £16.7 million (2022: loss £33.4 million). 
The Company’s total comprehensive income for the year was 
£61.2 million (2022: expense of £591.7 million).

28. Revaluation reserve

£ million

Group

Company

Group

Company

31 December 2023

31 December 2022

109
1,200
627
1,936
109

315
1,483
988
2,786
122

Balance at start of year

Revaluation gain/(loss) 

on property, plant and 
equipment

Balance at end of year

9.4

9.4

11.5

11.5

0.9
10.3

0.9
10.3

(2.1)
9.4

(2.1)
9.4

(£ million)

0.0

0.1

The revaluation reserve is not distributable.

For share-based awards granted during the year, the weighted average 
fair value of each award was 1,770 pence (2022: 2,470 pence).

90 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

(2.0)
(0.7)
154.1
1.7
155.8

2022
pence

2,414
2,388

107.2
21.0
(25.2)
40.2
143.2

107.5
2.5
–
(2.8)
107.2

29.  Net asset value per ordinary share –  

basic and diluted

Net asset value per ordinary share is based on the following data:

2023

2022

3,573.3
156.8

3,721.7
156.8

31 December

Net assets (£ million)
Number of shares in issue (million)
Shares held in EBT (million)

Shares held in treasury (million)
Basic shares (million)
Effect of share-based payment awards (million)
Diluted shares (million)

31 December

Net asset value per ordinary share –  basic
Net asset value per ordinary share – diluted

(1.6)
(9.3)
145.9
1.4
147.3

2023
pence

2,449
2,426

30. Investments in subsidiary undertakings
£ million

Carrying value at 1 January 2023

Additions
Disposals
Fair value movements in year
Carrying value at 31 December 2023

£ million

Carrying value at 1 January 2022
Additions
Disposals
Fair value movements in year
Carrying value at 31 December 2022

Investments in subsidiary undertakings are stated at cost or fair 
value where appropriate.

At 31 December 2023 the Company held investments in the 
following subsidiaries, which, unless otherwise stated, are 
wholly-owned, share the same accounting reference date as the 
Company and operate principally in their country of incorporation. 
The voting share capital, unless otherwise stated, is held directly by 
the Company.

In accordance with IFRS 10 the subsidiary below is consolidated by 
the Group and held by the Company at cost:

Name
JRCM1 

Issued share capital

£6,250,001 divided into 6,250,000 ordinary shares of 
£1 each and one special share of £1 which provides 
rights over the use of the “J. Rothschild” name.

1   Registered office and principal place of business: 27 St. James’s Place, 

London SW1A 1NR.

In accordance with IFRS 10 the Company and Group holds the 
following subsidiaries at fair value at 31 December 2023:

Principal place of 
business

Name
Spencer House Limited1,5
RIT US Value Partnership LP1,6
RIT Investments GP Limited2,3,5 
J. Rothschild Capital Management US Inc4,5  United States 
RIT Investments US Inc3,4,5
United States 
RIT US Holdings LLP3,4,6
United States 

England
England
Scotland 

Ownership
 interest

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

1   Registered office and principal place of business: 27 St. James’s Place, 

London SW1A 1NR.

2   Registered office and principal place of business: 50 Lothian Road, Edinburgh 

EH3 9WJ.

3  Held indirectly.
4  Registered office: 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, USA.
5  Ownership interest is ordinary shares.
6  Ownership interest is partnership capital.

For all of the above the proportion of voting rights held is equivalent 
to the ownership interest.

There are no significant restrictions arising from any contractual 
arrangements or regulatory requirements that would affect the ability 
of any of the above entities to transfer funds to or repay loans made 
by the Company.

There are no other current commitments or contractual 
arrangements to provide financial support to any of the entities 
above other than in the normal course of business (e.g. funding of 
investment transactions/capital calls). The Company has not assisted 
any of the above entities in obtaining financial support in any way 
over the year.

31. Dividends

2023
Pence
per share

2022
Pence
per share

2023
£ million

2022
£ million

Dividends paid in year

38.0

37.0

56.7

57.6

The above amounts were paid as distributions to equity holders of 
the Company in the relevant year from accumulated capital profits.

Dividends are not paid on shares held in treasury and the EBT waives 
its rights to all dividends.

On 27 February 2023 the Board declared a first interim dividend of 
19.0 pence per share in respect of the year ended 31 December 
2023 that was paid on 28 April 2023. A second interim dividend of 
19.0 pence per share was declared by the Board on 31 July 2023 and 
paid on 27 October 2023. 

The Board declares the payment of a first interim dividend of 
19.5 pence per share in respect of the year ending 31 December 
2024. This will be paid on 26 April 2024 to shareholders on the 
register on 5 April 2024, and funded from the accumulated capital 
profits.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 91

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
Notes to the Financial Statements

32.  Reconciliation of profit/(loss) before finance costs 
and taxation to net cash inflow/(outflow) from 
operating activities before taxation and interest

Group

£ million
Borrowings – current

£ million

2023

2022

Borrowings – non-current

Profit/(loss) before dividend and interest income, 

Total

Non-cash
changes in
fair value1

Net
(drawdowns)/
repayments

12.0

(3.5)

8.5

81.3

–

81.3

2022

(236.2)

(134.4)

(370.6)

2023

(142.9)

(137.9)

(280.8)

Reconciliation of liabilities arising from financing activities:

finance costs and taxation 

Dividend income
Interest income
Profit/(loss) before finance costs and taxation
(Increase)/decrease in other receivables
Increase/(decrease) in other payables
Other movements
(Gains)/losses on borrowings
Realised foreign exchange (gains)/losses on  
repayments and drawings of borrowings1
Unrealised foreign exchange (gains)/losses on 
repayments and drawings of borrowings
Purchase of investments held at fair value
Sale of investments held at fair value
(Gains)/losses on fair value investments
(Increase)/decrease in derivatives1 
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating 
activities before taxation and interest

73.0
10.1
17.4
100.5
174.1
(24.3)
20.0
3.6

(569.2)
7.2
9.8
(552.2)
17.5
(105.3)
30.1
(34.5)

(15.3)

29.1

3.3
(853.4)
951.9
(11.2)
 (20.6)  

(5.2)
(886.3)
1,395.6
192.4
 (23.5)

328.6

57.7

1   These line items have been disaggregated from ‘other movements’ in the 

current year. The 2022 comparative figures have been re-presented to align 
with this updated format.

£ million

Profit/(loss) before dividend and interest income, 

finance costs and taxation 

Dividend income
Interest income
Profit/(loss) before finance costs and taxation
(Increase)/decrease in other receivables
Increase/(decrease) in other payables
Other movements
(Gains)/losses on borrowings
Realised foreign exchange (gains)/losses on 
repayments and drawings of borrowings1
Unrealised foreign exchange (gains)/losses on 
repayments and drawings of borrowings

(Increase)/decrease in investments in 

subsidiary undertakings1

Increase/(decrease) in amounts owed to 

group undertakings1

Purchase of investments held at fair value
Sale of investments held at fair value
(Gains)/losses on fair value investments
(Increase)/decrease in derivatives1 
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating 
activities before taxation and interest

Company

2023

2022

67.2
10.1
17.4
94.7
174.3
(22.2)
1.2
3.6

(581.6)
7.2
9.8
(564.6)
17.5
(89.7)
9.0
(34.5)

(15.3)  

 29.1

3.3

(5.2)

(40.2)

0.3

29.5
(832.5)
926.7
28.6
(20.6)

(34.9)
(883.8)
1,395.6
192.4
(23.5)

331.1

7.7

1   These line items have been disaggregated from ‘other movements’ in the 

current year. The 2022 comparative figures have been re-presented to align 
with this updated format.

92 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

1  Including currency translation.

33. Material investments and related undertakings
Further information regarding investments is shown here.

Disclosed below are the ten largest investments in the portfolio (excluding 
investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries) shown at fair value:

As at 31 December 2023

3D Opportunities
HCIF Offshore
BlackRock Strategic Equity
Attestor Value
ARCM IV
Tresidor Credit Opportunities
Motive
RIT US Value Partnership
Springs Opportunities
Caxton Dynamis
Total

As at 31 December 2022

Attestor Value
HCIF Offshore
3D Opportunities
Tresidor Credit Opportunities
BlackRock Strategic Equity
ARCM IV
Springs Opportunities
Motive
RIT US Value Partnership
Caxton Dynamis
Total

£ million

182.2
156.8
112.3
97.5
96.9
89.9
78.0
77.8
70.7
68.5

1,030.6

£ million

148.6
131.0
130.1
108.0
97.1
95.6
92.7
76.2
72.4
71.8
1,023.5

Further to the disclosures in Note 30 (Investments in subsidiary 
undertakings), the table on the following page shows a list of 
significant related undertakings of the Group as at 31 December 
2023. For the investments shown the principal place of business 
is considered to be the place of registration and the proportion of 
voting rights held is considered to be the ownership interest. 

The Directors do not consider that any of the portfolio investments 
shown in the table on the following page fall within the definition 
of an associated company (aside from the entities noted below the 
table) as the Group does not exercise significant influence over their 
operating and financial policies as it is a passive investor.

Notes to the Financial Statements

33. Material investments and related undertakings 
(continued)
In a number of cases the Group owns more than 50% of a particular 
class of shares or partnership interest. The Group does not consider 
these holdings, although greater than 50%, provide control of the 
investee entities concerned as firstly the Group’s position as a 
passive investor in these entities acts as a substantive barrier to its 
exercising any power over the investee and secondly the nature of 
the Group’s holding does not give it the ability to direct the relevant 
activities of the investee because it does not control or participate in 
the governing bodies of these entities.

Unconsolidated structured entities
The Group holds interests in closed-ended limited partnerships 
which invest in underlying companies or securities for the purpose of 
capital appreciation. The Group, alongside the other limited partners, 
makes commitments to finance the investment programme of 
the relevant GP or manager, who may draw down this committed 
amount either upfront or over a period of years. 

The table below shows the Group’s carrying value of such 
investments and represents the maximum exposure to loss based 
on the Group’s contributions to date.

£ million
Total1

2023

1,729

2022

2,034

1   Included within Investments held at fair value.

The list of significant related undertakings below is pursuant to the 
requirements of Companies Act 2006, Statutory Instrument 2015 
No. 980 The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2015, IFRS and the SORP.

Disclosed below for the year ended 31 December 2023 are:

• 

• 

• 

 Entities classified as significant holdings (20% or greater interest 
in a class of shares or partnership);

 Material investee undertakings in which the Group had an interest 
of over 3% of the allotted shares of any class; and

 Material investment funds in which the Group had an interest of 
10% or more in any class of share or unit.

All the investments in the table below are held at FVPL.

Investment name

1992 Co-Invest (Offshore) LP
3D Opportunities

Browning West Cayman SPV 2 LP

Darwin Private Equity I LP
Firebird New Russia Fund Ltd, Class A1
Fortress Credit Opportunities Fund (C) LP

ICQ Holdings 6 LLC
Infinity SDC Ltd1
JRCM (London) LLP1
LCV Fund III LP
Media Technology Ventures IV LP
RR Capital Partners LP
Sand Grove Tactical Fund LP
Springs Global Strategic Partners Fund – Anchor 
Class
Springs Opportunities Fund LP, Series A
Tresidor Credit Opportunities Fund
Xander Seleucus II LP
Xander Seleucus LP
Xander Seleucus Retail LP

Place of registration

Registered address

PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands Maples Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, 
Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands Walkers Corporate Limited, Cayman Corporate Centre, 27 Hospital 
Road, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9008, Cayman Islands
Scotland
50 Lothian Road, Festival Square, Edinburgh EH3 9WJ
PO Box 897, Windward 1, Grand Cayman KY1-1103
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands Maples Corporate Services Limited, P.O. Box 309, Ugland House, 
Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808
500-600 Witan Gate West, Milton Keynes MK9 1SH
27 St James’s Place, London SW1A 1NR
3500 South Dupont Highway, Dover, Kent, Delaware, 19901
185 Berry Street, Suite 3600, San Francisco, California 94107
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2100, San Francisco, California 94111
PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104
2nd Floor, 2 Custom House Plaza, Harbourmaster Place, Dublin 1

Delaware, USA
England & Wales
England & Wales
Delaware, USA
California, USA
Delaware, USA
Cayman Islands
Ireland

Cayman Islands 4th Floor, Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY1-9010
2nd Floor, 2 Custom House Plaza, Harbourmaster Place, Dublin 1
PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman KY1-1104
PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman KY1-1104
PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman KY1-1104

Ireland
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands

Fair value 
£ million

% 
interest

30.1
182.2

55.4%
18.2%

22.5

20.7%

0.6
1.3
0.7

23.9%
25.0%
33.3%

25.6 100.0%
23.9%
13.3
50.0%
0.0
31.3%
17.2
38.5%
1.6
20.5%
0.3
20.6 100.0%
30.2%

0.4

70.7
58.2%
89.9 100.0%
41.9%
43.3%
48.8%

0.2
0.0
1.3

1   The Directors consider these entities, in which the Group holds ordinary shares, or limited partnership interests, as associated companies as the Group has 

significant influence due to circumstances particular to the investment. The Group has chosen to account for associated companies held for investment 
purposes at FVPL in accordance with IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 93

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Independent Auditor’s Report

94 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Report on the audit of the Financial Statements

Opinion
In our opinion:

 RIT Capital Partners plc’s Group financial statements and Parent Company financial statements (the ‘financial statements’) give a true 
and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2023 and of the Group’s profit for the 
year then ended;

 the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards;

 the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting 
standards as applied in accordance with section 408 of the Companies Act 2006; and

the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements of RIT Capital Partners plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (collectively the ‘Group’) for 
the year ended 31 December 2023 which comprise:

Group

Parent Company

Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income for the year to 31 December 2023

Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2023

Parent Company Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2023

Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity for the year to 
31 December 2023

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year to 
31 December 2023

Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statement for the year 
to 31 December 2023

Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statement for the year 
to 31 December 2023

Related notes 1 to 33 to the financial statements, including a 
summary of significant accounting policies

Related notes 1 to 33 to the financial statements, including a 
summary of significant accounting policies

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK-adopted international accounting 
standards and as regards the Parent Company financial statements, as applied in accordance with section 408 of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (‘ISAs (UK)’) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We 
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence
We are independent of the Group and Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the 
financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our 
other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain 
independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting the audit.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 95

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
 
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of 
the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue to 
adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:

 Obtaining an understanding of the Directors’ processes and controls for determining the appropriateness of the use of the going 
concern basis. This included discussions with J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited (the ‘Manager’) on the governance structure, 
corroborating our understanding with the Audit and Risk Committee and obtaining the Directors’ going concern assessment, including 
cashflow forecasts, stress tests and covenant calculations, covering the period to 30 June 2025, which is 16 months from the date 
these financial statements were authorised for issue;

 Reviewing the Group’s cashflow forecasts and stress tests, assessing the completeness of the severe scenarios that consider the key 
risks identified by the Group. We considered the appropriateness of the methods used to calculate the cashflow forecasts, stress tests 
and covenant calculations and determined through inspection and review of the methodology and calculations that the methods utilised 
were appropriate to be able to make an assessment for the entity;

 Obtaining the Group’s reverse stress tests and identifying the factors that would lead to the Group utilising all liquidity or breaching 
financial covenants during the going concern period;

 Considering the actions the Group can take to mitigate the impact of the reverse stress test scenarios. This included evaluating the 
Parent Company’s ability to prevent a breach of financial covenants using mitigating actions if required, such as the repayment of 
borrowings. We also verified credit facilities available to the Parent Company by obtaining third party confirmations;

 Reviewing the liquidity and regulatory capital position of the Group, including an assessment of the liquidity profile of the 
Group’s portfolio;

 Making enquiries of the Manager and reviewing board minutes and key regulatory documents for risks, events or contrary evidence that 
may impact the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern; and

 Reviewing the Group’s going concern disclosures included in the Report & Accounts in order to assess that the disclosures were 
appropriate and in conformity with the reporting standards.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or 
collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period assessed by 
the Directors, being the period to 30 June 2025, which is 16 months from the date these financial statements were authorised for issue.

In relation to the Group and Parent Company’s reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing 
material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors 
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this 
report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to 
continue as a going concern.

96 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overview of our audit approach

Key audit matters

Audit scope

 Risk of inaccurate recognition of investment income and gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value.

 Risk of incorrect valuation of investments held at fair value.

 The Group is principally managed from one location in London. All core functions are located 
in London.

 The Group comprises one consolidated subsidiary and six subsidiaries held at fair value. Monitoring 
and control over the operations of these subsidiaries, including those located overseas, is centralised 
in London.

 The London based Group audit team directly performed audit procedures on all items material to the 
Group and Parent Company financial statements.

Materiality

 Overall Group materiality of £35.7m which represents 1% of net assets.

An overview of the scope of the Parent Company and Group audits
Tailoring the scope
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope for each 
entity within the Group. Taken together, this enables us to form an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We take into account 
size, risk profile, the organisation of the Group and effectiveness of Group-wide controls, changes in the business environment and other 
factors when assessing the level of work to be performed at each entity.

The investment portfolio balance is the most material part of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Monitoring and control over the valuation 
of investments is exercised by the Manager centrally in London, and as such is audited wholly by the London based Group audit team. 
Monitoring and control over the operations of the subsidiaries within the Group is also centralised in London. The Group audit team 
performed all the work necessary to issue the Group and Parent Company audit opinion, including undertaking all of the audit work on the 
risks of material misstatement identified above. There were no component audit teams.

In establishing our audit approach, we considered the type of audit procedures required to be performed and the audit evidence required 
to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence as a basis of our opinion on the Group. All audit evidence was received electronically and 
there were regular on-site visits to the Manager’s offices. Meetings with the Manager and the Directors were conducted in person or over 
video conferencing. The audit team encountered no difficulties in connecting with the Manager or the Directors and were able to execute the 
audit fieldwork effectively.

Climate change
There has been increasing interest from stakeholders as to how climate change will impact companies. The Group has determined that 
the most significant future impacts from climate change on its operations may be from environmental exposure, and existing or proposed 
regulation that may adversely affect their underlying portfolio investments. This is explained on page 28 in the Principal Risks and Viability 
section of the Strategic Report, which forms part of the “Other information”, rather than the audited financial statements. Our procedures 
on these disclosures therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our 
knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on 
“Other information”.

In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of climate change on the Group’s business and any consequential 
material impact on its financial statements.

Our audit effort in considering climate change was focused on the adequacy of the Group’s disclosures in the financial statements as set 
out in Note 1 and concluded that there was no material impact from climate change on the financial statements. We also challenged the 
Directors’ considerations of climate change in their assessment of viability and associated disclosures.

Based on our work we have not identified the impact of climate change on the financial statements to be a key audit matter or to impact a 
key audit matter.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 97

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
 
 
 
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of 
the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified. 
These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and 
directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a 
whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Risk

Our response to the risk

Risk of inaccurate recognition of investment income 
and gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value 
(2023: £139.2m, 2022: £(536.4)m)

Refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Report (pages 52 
to 55); Accounting policies (pages 70 to 73); and Notes 2 
and 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 74)

We obtained an understanding of the Manager’s processes and controls 
around the investment income process and valuation process to ascertain 
whether realised and unrealised gains/(losses) and investment income are 
appropriately calculated by performing walkthroughs.

For gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value, on a sample basis, 
we have:

The Group’s revenue consists of investment income and 
gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value.

 recalculated the unrealised gains/(losses), considering the procedures 
performed on the valuations where relevant;

The accuracy of recognition and measurement of revenue is 
material to the Group’s financial statements.

Shareholder expectations may place pressure on the 
Manager to influence the recognition of revenue. This may 
result in overstatement or deferral of revenues to assist in 
meeting current or future targets or expectations.

 agreed purchases and sales of investments during the year to trade 
tickets, sales agreements, call and distributions notices, and to the 
corresponding cash movements in bank statements; and

 recalculated realised gains/(losses) from disposals in the year.

For investment income, on a sample basis, we have:

 agreed dividend income to an independent source and to corresponding 
receipts in bank statements;

 agreed distributions received to the notices from the fund managers and 
to bank statements;

 recalculated interest income based on the terms of underlying 
agreements;

 agreed accrued dividends at the period end to an external source and 
post year end bank statements, where received as at the date of this 
report, for occurrence and measurement;

 tested the completeness of income receipts by verifying that income 
declared during the period, per an independent source, has been 
correctly recorded as an income receipt; and

 recalculated income from investment properties based on the terms of 
the underlying agreements.

We have also performed journal entry testing and made enquiries of 
management in order to address the residual risk of management override.

Key observations communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee

The results of our procedures identified no material misstatements in relation to the risk of inaccurate recognition of investment income 
and gains/(losses) on investments held at fair value.

98 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk

Our response to the risk

Risk of incorrect valuation of investments held at fair value 
(2023: £3,602.0m, 2022: £3,672.1m)

Refer to the Audit and Risk Committee Report (pages 52 to 
55); Accounting policies (pages 70 to 73); and Note 13 of 
the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 78 to 87).

Investments held at fair value are material, and are 
the primary driver of the Group’s net asset value and 
total profit.

The Group’s investment portfolio is diverse and includes 
both listed and unlisted investments. Unlisted investments 
are held in the form of both direct private and illiquid fund 
investments. There is also exposure to investment property 
and derivative financial instruments.

The Group’s investments are held at fair value through profit 
and loss.

We obtained an understanding of the Manager’s processes and controls for 
determining the fair valuation of investments by performing walkthroughs. 
Our procedures also included reviewing the governance structure and 
protocols around oversight of the valuation process, including their 
oversight of the valuations performed by the underlying GPs and funds and 
corroborating our understanding by attending Valuation Committee meetings 
in an observational capacity.

We assessed the Manager’s valuation methodology against applicable 
reporting frameworks, including UK-adopted international accounting 
standards and the IPEV and RICS Guidelines. We sought explanations from 
the Manager where there were judgements applied in its application of the 
guidelines and assessed their appropriateness.

For listed investments, we verified market prices and exchange rates applied 
by the Manager to an independent pricing vendor and recalculated the 
investment valuations as at the year end.

For a sample of illiquid fund investments, we:

Fair value is determined using prices readily available on an 
exchange where the investments are listed.

 confirmed the most recently available fund valuation to third party 
statements, including from the GP, fund manager or fund administrator;

Investments in illiquid funds are valued based on latest 
information provided by the relevant fund administrator or 
investment manager.

The valuation of direct private investments are either 
prepared by the Manager or General Partner (‘GP’) (and 
assessed by the Manager), and ultimately determined by 
the independent Valuation Committee, and are complex 
and include estimates and significant judgements. Where 
the Manager has sufficient information to undertake its 
own valuations, these are prepared in accordance with 
International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation 
(‘IPEV’) guidelines.

The Manager has engaged a specialist to prepare valuations 
of their investment property, in accordance with Royal 
Institution of Chartered Surveyors (‘RICS’) guidelines.

There is the risk that inaccurate judgements made in 
the assessment of fair value could lead to the incorrect 
valuation of investments. In turn, this could materially 
misstate the Financial assets at fair value in the 
Consolidated and Parent Company Balance Sheet, and the 
Gains/(losses) on fair value investments in the Consolidated 
Income Statement. There is also a risk that the Manager 
may influence the judgements and estimations in respect of 
unlisted investments in order to meet market expectations.

 where the most recently available fund valuation was not at the year end 
date, reviewed the Manager’s approach to address the timing difference 
and challenged any adjustments made to the last valuation received. 
Where applicable, we corroborated these adjustments by agreeing any 
cash flows between the date of the fund valuation and the Group’s year 
end valuation date to supporting documentation; and

 challenged the Manager on the IFRS 13 levelling classification of 
the illiquid fund portfolio, focusing on those which are considered to 
be subjective.

For the valuation of a sample of direct private investments determined by the 
Manager, we:

 challenged the appropriateness of assumptions made in the underlying 
valuation models;

 verified inputs to the valuation models to source data;

 tested the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models;

 assessed the impact of contradictory evidence, to ensure an appropriate 
valuation was determined;

 for a sub-set of our sample, engaged our valuation specialists to form an 
independent range for the key assumptions used in the valuation, with 
reference to relevant industry and market valuation considerations; and

 considered the impact of the current macroeconomic climate throughout 
the procedures performed on the valuation of direct private investments, 
by challenging whether the valuation methodologies and assumptions 
used remained appropriate.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 99

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk

Our response to the risk

For a sample of illiquid fund and direct private investments we:

 assessed prior year valuations which were based on unaudited net asset 
statements by reference to their respective audited financial statements, 
and obtained explanations for all material movements;

 discussed with the Manager the rationale for any differences between 
the exit prices of investments realised during the year and the prior 
year fair value, to further verify the reasonableness of the current year 
valuation models and methodology adopted by the Manager.

 obtained and assessed the due diligence performed by the Manager for 
new investments made in the year.

With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we formed an independent 
range for the fair value of the Group’s investment properties and a sample of 
unquoted derivative instruments.

During the post year end period, we monitored the receipt by the Manager 
of updated valuation statements and other financial information relevant to 
the valuation of the illiquid fund investments in order to assess whether any 
material differences arose.

We have also performed journal entry testing and made enquiries of 
management in order to address the residual risk of management override.

Key observations communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee

The results of our procedures identified no material misstatements in relation to the risk of incorrect valuation of investments held at 
fair value.

In the prior year, our auditor’s report included a key audit matter in relation to the ‘Risk of incorrect valuation of direct private and illiquid fund 
investments’. This key audit matter was expanded in the year to cover the risk of incorrect valuation of the entire investment portfolio and our 
procedures performed are reported above in the ‘Risk of incorrect valuation of investments held at fair value’.

100 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc 
 
 
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit 
and in forming our audit opinion.

Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the 
economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our 
audit procedures.

We determined materiality for the Group to be £35.7m (2022: £37.2m), which is 1% (2022: 1%) of net assets. We believe that net assets 
provides us with a consistent year on year basis for determining materiality, and is the most relevant measure to the stakeholders of 
the entity.

We determined materiality for the Parent Company to be £34.6m (2022: £36.2m), which is 1% (2022: 1%) of net assets.

We calculated materiality during the planning stage of the audit and then during the course of our audit, we reassessed materiality based on 
31 December 2023 net assets, and adjusted our audit procedures accordingly.

Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the 
probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.

On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group’s overall control environment, our judgment was that 
performance materiality was 75% (2022: 75%) of our planning materiality, namely £26.8m (2022: £27.9m). We have set performance 
materiality at this percentage based on the fact that there were no material prior year misstatements, that the internal control environment is 
consistent with the prior year and there have been no significant changes in circumstances.

Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.

We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of £1.8m (2022: £1.9m), 
which is set at 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative 
grounds. We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of 
other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.

Other information
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report 
thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this 
report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with 
the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify 
such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material 
misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material 
misstatement of the other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 101

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies 
Act 2006.

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

 the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are 
prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

 the Strategic Report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course of the 
audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic Report or the Directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in 
our opinion:

 adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from 
branches not visited by us; or

 the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with 
the accounting records and returns; or

 certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

 we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance 
Statement relating to the Group and Parent Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for 
our review by the Listing Rules.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance 
Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:

 Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material 
uncertainties identified set out on page 30;

 Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the Parent Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period 
is appropriate set out on page 30;

 Director’s statement on whether it has a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meets its 
liabilities set out on page 30;

 Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 51;

 Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on page 25;

 The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on 
page 24; and

 The section describing the work of the audit committee set out on page 52.

102 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 51, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of 
the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is 
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as 
a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the 
Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, 
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be 
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud 
is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or 
intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including 
fraud is detailed below.

However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the Parent 
Company and the Manager.

Our approach was as follows:

 We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Group and determined that the most 
significant are those that relate to the reporting framework (UK-adopted international accounting standards, the Companies Act 2006, 
the AIC code, the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code and the Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018) and relevant 
tax compliance regulations. In addition, we concluded that there are certain significant laws and regulations which may influence the 
determination of the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements including the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority.

 We understood how RIT Capital Partners plc is complying with those frameworks by making enquiries of the Manager, including 
the General Counsel and Company Secretary, Chief Financial and Operating Officer, Head of Compliance and Internal Audit and 
also the Non-Executive Directors including the Chairs of the Audit and Risk Committee, and Valuation Committee. We corroborated 
our understanding through our review of Board minutes, Remuneration Committee minutes, papers provided to the Audit and Risk 
Committee, including Valuation Committee packs, minutes of the Board’s Conflicts Committee and correspondence received from 
regulatory bodies.

 We assessed the susceptibility of the Group’s financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur by 
meeting with Directors and the Manager to understand where they considered there was susceptibility to fraud. We also considered 
performance targets and their potential influence on efforts made by Directors and the Manager to manage the net asset value (‘NAV’) 
per share or the NAV per share total return. We identified a fraud risk with respect to management override in relation to the risk of 
inaccurate recognition of investment income and gains/(losses) on unquoted investments held at fair value and the risk of incorrect 
valuation of direct private investments. Our audit procedures stated above in the ‘Key audit matters section’ of this Auditor’s report 
were performed to address each identified fraud risk. In order to address the residual risk of management override we have performed 
journal entry testing and enquiries of senior management as detailed below.

 Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. Our 
procedures involved; journal entry testing, with a focus on manual journals and journals indicating large or unusual transactions based 
on our understanding of the business; enquiries of the directors of the Manager and of the Audit and Risk Committee at the planning 
and completion stages of the audit; and focused testing, as referred to in the key audit matters section above.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at 
https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 103

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   | 
 
 
 
Other matters we are required to address

 We were appointed by the Parent Company on 26 April 2018 to audit the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2018 
and subsequent financial periods.

 The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments is six years, covering the years ending 
31 December 2018 to 31 December 2023.

 The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit and Risk Committee.

Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required 
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the Group and Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the 
opinions we have formed.

Mike Gaylor (Senior statutory auditor) 
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor, London 
4 March 2024

Notes:
1. 

 The maintenance and integrity of the RIT Capital Partners plc web site is the responsibility of the Directors; the work carried out by the auditors does 
not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial 
statements since they were initially presented on the web site.

2.   Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

104 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of  RIT Capital Partners plc 
 
 
 Other Information
31 December 2023
(Unaudited)

RIT Capital Partners plc

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 105

 
Investment Portfolio Reconciliation

Investment portfolio reconciliation
The following table shows a summary reconciliation between the amounts reported within the Investment Portfolio, as shown on pages 21 
to 23, and the 31 December 2023 consolidated balance sheet, as shown on page 65:

£ million

Non-current assets

   Portfolio investments at fair value

   Non-consolidated subsidiaries

Investments held at fair value

Investment property

Property, plant and equipment

Retirement benefit asset

Derivative financial instruments

Current assets

Derivative financial instruments

Other receivables

Amounts owed by group undertakings

Cash at bank

Total assets

Current liabilities

Borrowings

Derivative financial instruments

Other payables

Amounts owed to group undertakings

Net current assets/(liabilities)

Total assets less current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Borrowings

Provisions

Finance lease liability

Net assets

31 December 2023

Quoted 
equity

Private 
investments

Uncorrelated 
strategies

Net liquidity/ 
borrowing/ 
other

Consolidated 
balance 
sheet

1,357.1

0.1

1,357.2

–

–

–

5.9

1,251.0

33.5

1,284.5

–

–

–

–

754.2

104.5

858.7

34.1

21.6

–

–

1,363.1

1,284.5

914.4

26.8

–

–

2.3

29.1

–

–

–

–

–

1,392.2

1,284.5

–

(0.3)

(21.0)

–

(21.3)

7.8

–

–

–

–

–

–

6.0

0.5

–

–

6.5

920.9

–

(1.8)

(2.1)

–

(3.9)

2.6

1,370.9

1,284.5

917.0

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(2.9)

(2.9)

1,370.9

1,284.5

914.1

–

(1.0)

(1.0)

–

–

0.1

–

(0.9)

32.6

70.7

0.1

202.0

305.4

304.5

(142.9)

(0.7)

(16.1)

(0.1)

(159.8)

145.6

144.7

(137.9)

(3.0)

–

(140.9)

3.8

3,362.3

137.1

3,499.4

34.1

21.6

0.1

5.9

3,561.1

65.4

71.2

0.1

204.3

341.0

3,902.1

(142.9)

(2.8)

(39.2)

(0.1)

(185.0)

156.0

3,717.1

(137.9)

(3.0)

(2.9)

(143.8)

3,573.3

106 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

 
 
 
 
 
 
Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures

Glossary
Within this Annual Report and Accounts, we publish certain 
financial measures common to investment trusts. Where relevant, 
these are prepared in accordance with guidance from the AIC, and 
this glossary provides additional information in relation to them.

Net asset value (NAV) per share: The NAV per share is calculated 
by dividing the total value of all the assets of the trust less its 
liabilities (net assets) by the number of shares outstanding. Unless 
otherwise stated, this refers to the diluted NAV per share, with 
debt held at fair value.

Alternative performance measures (APMs): APMs are numerical 
measures of the Company’s current, historical or future financial 
performance, financial position or cash flows, other than financial 
measures defined or specified in the Company’s applicable financial 
framework – namely UK adopted IAS and the AIC SORP.  They are 
denoted with an * in this section.

CPI: The CPI refers to the United Kingdom Consumer Price Index 
as calculated by the Office for National Statistics and published 
monthly. It is the UK Government’s target measure of inflation and, 
from 1 January 2022, is used as a measure of inflation in one of the 
Company’s KPIs, CPI plus 3.0% per annum.

Gearing*: Gearing is a measure of the level of debt deployed within 
the portfolio. The ratio is calculated in accordance with AIC guidance 
as total assets, net of cash, divided by net assets and expressed as 
a ‘net’ percentage, e.g. 110% would be shown as 10%.

£ million
Total assets
Less: cash
Sub total
Net assets
Gearing

2023
3,902.1
(204.3)
3,697.8
3,573.3
3.5%

2022
4,171.5
(218.0)
3,953.5
3,721.7
6.2%

Leverage: Leverage, as defined by the UK Alternative Investment 
Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), is any method which increases 
the exposure of the portfolio, whether through borrowings or 
leverage embedded in derivative positions or by any other means.

MSCI All Country World Index: The MSCI All Country World 
Index is a total return, market capitalisation-weighted equity index 
covering major developed and emerging markets. Described in 
this report as the ACWI or the ACWI (50% £), this is one of the 
Company’s KPIs or reference hurdles and, since its introduction in 
2013, has incorporated a 50% sterling measure. This is calculated 
using 50% of the ACWI measured in sterling and therefore 
exposed to translation risk from the underlying foreign currencies. 
The remaining 50% uses a sterling-hedged ACWI from 1 January 
2015 (from when this is readily available). This incorporates hedging 
costs, which the portfolio also incurs, to protect against currency 
risk and is an investable index. Prior to this date it uses the index 
measured in local currencies. Before December 1998, when total 
return indices were introduced, the index is measured using a 
capital-only version. 

NAV total return*: The NAV total return for a period represents the 
change in NAV per share, adjusted to reflect dividends paid during 
the period. The calculation assumes that dividends are reinvested in 
the NAV at the month end following the NAV going ex-dividend. The 
NAV per share at 31 December 2023 was 2,426 pence, an increase 
of 38 pence, or 1.6%, from 2,388 pence at the previous year end. 
As dividends totalling 38 pence per share were paid during the year, 
the effect of reinvesting the dividends in the NAV is 1.6%, which 
results in a NAV total return of +3.2%.

Net quoted equity exposure: This is the estimated level of 
exposure that the trust has to listed equity markets. It includes the 
assets held in the quoted equity category of the portfolio adjusted 
for the notional exposure from quoted equity derivatives, as well 
as estimated cash balances held by externally-managed funds and 
estimated exposure levels from hedge fund managers.

Notional: In relation to derivatives, this represents the estimated 
exposure that is equivalent to holding the same underlying position 
through a cash security.

Ongoing charges figure (OCF): As a self-managed investment 
trust with operating subsidiaries, the calculation of the Company’s 
OCF requires adjustments to the total operating expenses. 
In accordance with AIC guidance, the main adjustments are to 
remove non-recurring costs as well as direct performance-related 
compensation from JRCM, as this is analogous to a performance 
fee for an externally-managed trust.

£ million
Operating expenses
Adjustments
Ongoing charges
Average net assets
OCF

2023
42.7
(15.0)
27.7
3,614
0.77%

2022
43.6
(7.6)
36.0
4,045
0.89%

In addition to the above, managers charge fees within the 
external funds (and in a few instances directly to RIT in relation to 
segregated accounts). We have estimated that, based on average 
net assets across the year and annual management fee rates per 
fund (excluding performance fees), these represent an additional 
0.94% of average net assets (2022: 0.88%).

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 107

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures

Premium/discount: The premium or discount (or rating) is 
calculated by taking the closing share price on 31 December 
2023 and dividing it by the NAV per share at 31 December 2023, 
expressed as a net percentage. If the share price is above/below 
the NAV per share, the shares are said to be trading at a premium/
discount.

Share price total return or total shareholder return (TSR)*: The 
TSR for a period represents the change in the share price adjusted 
to reflect dividends paid during the period. Similar to calculating 
a NAV total return, the calculation assumes the dividends are 
notionally reinvested at the daily closing share price following the 
shares going ex-dividend. The share price on 31 December 2023 
closed at 1,882 pence, a decrease of 243 pence, or 11.4%, from 
2,125 pence at the previous year end. Dividends totalling  
38 pence per share were paid during the year, and the effect of 
reinvesting the dividends in the share price is 1.8%, which results  
in a TSR of  -9.6%. The TSR is one of the Company’s KPIs.

108 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Historical Information and Financial Calendar

Historical information

02 August 1988
31 March 1989
31 March 1990
31 March 1991
31 March 1992
31 March 1993
31 March 1994
31 March 1995
31 March 1996
31 March 1997
31 March 1998
31 March 1999
31 March 2000
31 March 2001
31 March 2002
31 March 2003
31 March 2004
31 March 2005
31 March 2006
31 March 2007
31 March 2008
31 March 2009
31 March 2010
31 March 2011
31 March 2012
31 December 2012
31 December 2013
31 December 2014
31 December 2015
31 December 2016
31 December 2017
31 December 2018
31 December 2019
31 December 2020
31 December 2021
31 December 2022
31 December 2023

Notes:

Diluted 
net assets 
£ million
280.5
344.4
334.0
318.0
305.5
385.9
468.6
450.2
560.8
586.1
737.5
759.7
811.4
759.8
758.3
674.7
981.1
1,113.1
1,534.7
1,635.6
1,690.0
1,350.5
1,815.7
1,984.0
1,920.0
1,847.2
2,146.0
2,299.6
2,441.3
2,692.1
2,858.3
2,830.2
3,145.6
3,590.4
4,390.3
3,721.7
3,573.3

Diluted 
NAV 
per share 
pence
105.9
134.2
131.0
131.7
140.7
181.1
221.6
213.4
283.2
303.5
384.1
398.6
509.0
484.3
483.4
430.2
628.2
712.7
982.7
1,047.3
1,091.6
874.3
1,180.1
1,289.4
1,249.3
1,191.4
1,383.6
1,483.0
1,572.5
1,730
1,839
1,821
2,004
2,292
2,794
2,388
2,426

Closing 
share price 
pence
81.5
114.0
97.0
92.0
85.2
117.0
171.0
174.0
223.0
242.5
327.0
341.0
439.0
436.5
424.5
371.5
577.5
694
1,020
1,000
1,147
831
1,082
1,307
1,220
1,131
1,260
1,397
1,681
1,885
1,962
1,910
2,115
2,065
2,750
2,125
1,882

Premium/ 
(discount) 
%
(23.0)
(15.1)
(26.0)
(30.1)
(39.4)
(35.4)
(22.8)
(18.5)
(21.3)
(20.1)
(14.9)
(14.5)
(13.8)
(9.9)
(12.2)
(13.6)
(8.1)
(2.6)
3.8
(4.5)
5.1
(5.0)
(8.3)
1.4
(2.3)
(5.1)
(8.9)
(5.8)
6.9
9.0
6.7
4.9
5.5
(9.9)
(1.6)
(11.0)
(22.4)

Diluted 
earnings 
per share 
pence
n/a
29.3
(2.5)
0.7
6.6
40.5
41.5
(8.1)
63.3
17.2
81.5
14.6
100.2
(28.8)
2.2
(50.2)
195.9
90.0
270.3
67.0
50.6
(205.2)
306.3
111.7
(35.7)
(29.6)
215.7
129.8
121.4
195.0
142.4
17.5
220.8
321.0
545.5
(371.3)
43.8

Dividend 
per share 
pence
n/a
1.7
2.6
2.4
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
4.0
7.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
28.0
28.0
29.4
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
35.25
37.0
38.0

1.   The Company commenced its business as an approved investment trust on 3 August 1988, following the listing of its share capital on the London Stock 

Exchange. 

2.   Prior to 31 March 2000, the diluted net assets were measured on the assumption that all convertible stock was converted at the balance sheet date. 

By 31 March 2000, all convertible stock had been converted or redeemed. 

3.  Dividends per share represent the amounts paid in the relevant financial year or period. 

4.   Since 31 March 2005 the closing share price has been displayed to the nearest pence and from 31 December 2016 the diluted net assets per share has been 

disclosed to the nearest pence. 

Financial calendar:

2 May 2024, 12:00pm:
26 April 2024: 

Annual General Meeting.
Payment of interim dividend.

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 109

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Investor Information

Share price information
The Company’s £1 ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange and may be identified using the following codes:

TIDM: 
SEDOL: 
ISIN: 

RCP LN
0736639 GB
GB0007366395

Daily and 15 minute delay share price information is displayed on the Company’s website: www.ritcap.com, as well as numerous 
online platforms.

Registrar
The Company’s registrar may be contacted as follows:

Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 6ZZ
Tel: 0370 703 6307
Overseas: +44 370 703 6307

Shareholders may contact the registrar should they need to notify a change of name or address, or have a query regarding the 
registration of their holding or the payment of a dividend. Shareholders who wish to have dividends credited directly to their bank 
account rather than paid by cheque may do so by arrangement with the registrar. Shareholders may also arrange with the registrar 
to have their dividend payment invested in additional RIT Capital Partners plc ordinary shares purchased in the market.

Registered holders of ordinary shares of RIT Capital Partners plc may elect to receive communications from the Company 
electronically as an alternative to receiving hard copy accounts and circulars. This facility is provided by the registrar and shareholders 
will need to go online at www.investorcentre.co.uk and select the ‘eComms’ signup section to participate. To complete the 
registration process shareholders will need their postcode or country of residence, along with their shareholder reference number 
(as shown on their share certificates or dividend advices). Shareholders will also be asked to agree to the terms and conditions for 
electronic communication.

Registered shareholders also have the facility to check their shareholding, change their address or update their bank mandate 
instruction by registering to become a member of ‘Investorcentre’.

Regardless of whether shareholders sign up for ‘eComms’ or become a member of ‘Investorcentre’, they are able to cast proxy 
votes in respect of general meetings electronically if they wish by using the link provided on their proxy form or in their email 
notification.

110 Report and Accounts December 2023 RIT Capital Partners plc

Directory

MANAGER, ADMINISTRATOR, COMPANY SECRETARY AND REGISTERED OFFICE
J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited
27 St. James’s Place
London SW1A 1NR

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
Ernst & Young LLP
25 Churchill Place
London E14 5EY

SOLICITOR
Linklaters LLP
One Silk Street
London EC2Y 8HQ

BROKERS
JP Morgan Cazenove Limited
25 Bank Street
London E14 5JP

Numis Securities Limited
45 Gresham Street
London EC2V 7BF

ADVISER TO THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE 
Alvarez & Marsal
Park House
16-18 Finsbury Circus
London EC2M 7EB 

CUSTODIAN
BNP Paribas S.A., London Branch
10 Harewood Avenue
London NW1 6AA

DEPOSITARY
BNP Paribas Trust Corporation UK Limited
10 Harewood Avenue
London NW1 6AA

AIC
The Company is a member of the Association of Investment Companies
www.theaic.co.uk

FOR INFORMATION
27 St. James’s Place
London SW1A 1NR
Tel: 020 7647 8565
Email: investorrelations@ritcap.co.uk 
Website: www.ritcap.com

RIT Capital Partners plc Report and Accounts December 2023 111

|   Company Highlights   |   Strategic Report   |   Governance   |   Financial Statements   |   Other Information   |Contents

Company Highlights

Strategic Report
Chairman’s Statement
Our Purpose, Strategy and Business Model
Manager’s Report
Investment Portfolio
Principal Risks and Viability
Sustainability Report

Governance
Board of Directors
J. Rothschild Capital Management
Corporate Governance Report
Audit and Risk Committee Report
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Report

Financial Statements
Consolidated Income Statement and Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Parent Company Balance Sheet
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statement
Notes to the Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report

Other Information
Investment Portfolio Reconciliation
Glossary and Alternative Performance Measures
Historical Information and Financial Calendar
Investor Information
Directory

1

3
6
11
21
24
31

37
39
40
52
56
60

64
65
66
67
68
69
70
95

106
107
109
110
111

Notes
Nothing in this Annual Report & Accounts should be construed as advice to buy or sell a particular investment.

RIT Capital Partners plc (RIT or the Company) is a UK public listed company, and as such complies with the UK Financial 
Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Listing Rules. The Company conducts its affairs so as to qualify for approval as an investment trust, 
and has been accepted as an approved investment trust by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), subject to continuing to meet 
the eligibility conditions. As an investment trust, it is not authorised or regulated by the FCA. RIT is classified as an Alternative 
Investment Fund (AIF) in accordance with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).

The investment manager, administrator, and company secretary is J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited (JRCM or the 
Manager), a subsidiary of RIT. JRCM is authorised and regulated by the FCA and is classified as an Alternative Investment Fund 
Manager (AIFM) in accordance with AIFMD. 

This report is printed on Revive 100% White Silk a totally recycled paper produced 
using 100% recycled waste at a mill that has been awarded the ISO 14001 
certificate for environmental management.

The pulp is bleached using a totally chlorine free (TCF) process.  
This report has been produced using vegetable based inks.

R
I
T
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
p
l
c

R
e
p
o
r
t

&
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s

f
o
r

t
h
e
y
e
a
r

e
n
d
e
d
3
1
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3

Report & Accounts 
for the year ended 31 December 2023

27 St. James’s Place London SW1A 1NR