UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒
☐
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from _______________ to _______________.
Commission File Number 1-13759
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
One Belvedere Place, Suite 300
Mill Valley, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
68-0329422
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
94941
(Zip Code)
Title of each class
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
(415) 389-7373
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Trading symbol(s)
RWT
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒
Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with
any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm
that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
At June 30, 2021, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,352,805,395 based
on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding on February 21, 2022 was 120,169,045.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Regulation 14A within
120 days after the end of registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report are incorporated by reference into Part III.
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
2021 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures (Not Applicable)
PART I
PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
[Reserved]
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
PART III
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 15.
Item 16.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Form 10-K Summary
Consolidated Financial Statements
PART IV
Page
1
6
54
55
55
55
56
58
59
102
109
109
109
110
109
111
111
111
111
111
112
116
F-1
i
Special Note - Cautionary Statement
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve
numerous risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ from our beliefs, expectations, estimates, and projections and,
consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements are
not historical in nature and can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,”
“seek,” “plan” and similar expressions or their negative forms, or by references to strategy, plans, or intentions. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, those described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
under the caption “Risk Factors.” Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected are described below and may be described from time to time in reports we file with the SEC, including reports on Forms 10-
Q and 8-K. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events, or otherwise.
Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, are forward-looking by their nature: (i) statements we make regarding
Redwood's business strategy and strategic focus, including statements relating to our overall market position, strategy and long-term
prospects (including trends driving the flow of capital in the housing finance market, our strategic initiatives designed to capitalize on
those trends, our ability to attract capital to finance those initiatives, our approach to raising capital, our ability to pay dividends in the
future, and the prospects for federal housing finance reform); statements related to our financial outlook and expectations for 2022 and
future years, including that we believe the diversity of our revenue streams, notably the resiliency they have shown past during periods
of rising interest rates, positions us well to navigate current market conditions; (iii) statements related to our residential mortgage
banking business, including with respect to our positioning to capture increased market share in 2022, our expectation that overall
mortgage origination volumes across the industry will decline, that we will look to increase our loan purchases under our Redwood
Choice and other expanded credit loan programs, and that we believe that the recent loan-level pricing adjustment increases on high
balance loans put forth by FHFA present an opportunity for our purchases of high balance loans to once again increase; (iv) statements
related to our investment portfolio, including that our near- to medium-term outlook for call activity remains heightened given a
backdrop of strong housing fundamentals, and that we expect up to $700 million of loans to become callable in 2022, at prices below
their estimated fair values, and another $1.4 billion to become callable through the end of 2024; (v) statements related to our business
purpose lending platform, including statements regarding CoreVest's outlook and pipeline of activity for 2022, that prevailing industry
dynamics continue to attract increased equity capital to the space, a trend we see continuing even as rates rise, and that we see
opportunities to enhance our direct origination capabilities through purchases from third-party correspondents, the expansion of our
new residential transition loan ("RTL") securitization platform, and opportunities to further scale our platform through partnerships or
additional acquisitions; (vi) statements regarding our expectation that RWT Horizons portfolio companies will drive significant option
value for shareholders, while delivering technology and other innovative efficiencies to our platforms, and our goal to have $50 to
$100 million of capital allocated through Horizons by the end of 2022 across an increasingly diversified portfolio of early- to mid-
stage companies (vii) statements relating to our estimate of our available capital (including that we estimate our available capital at
December 31, 2021 was approximately $150 million); (viii) statements relating to acquiring residential mortgage loans in the future
that we have identified for purchase or plan to purchase, including the amount of such loans that we identified for purchase during the
fourth quarter of 2021 and at December 31, 2021, expected fallout and the corresponding volume of residential mortgage loans
expected to be available for purchase, and outstanding forward sale agreements at quarter-end; (ix) statements we make regarding
future dividends, including with respect to our regular quarterly dividends in 2022; and (x) statements regarding our expectations and
estimates relating to the characterization for income tax purposes of our dividend distributions, our expectations and estimates relating
to tax accounting, tax liabilities and tax savings, and GAAP tax provisions, and our estimates of REIT taxable income and TRS
taxable income.
Important factors, among others, that may affect our actual results include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
general economic trends and the performance of the housing, real estate, mortgage finance, and broader financial markets;
federal and state legislative and regulatory developments and the actions of governmental authorities and entities;
changing benchmark interest rates, and the Federal Reserve’s actions and statements regarding monetary policy;
our ability to compete successfully;
our ability to adapt our business model and strategies to changing circumstances;
strategic business and capital deployment decisions we make;
our use of financial leverage;
our exposure to a breach of our cybersecurity or data security;
our exposure to credit risk and the timing of credit losses within our portfolio;
ii
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the concentration of the credit risks we are exposed to, including due to the structure of assets we hold, the geographical
concentration of real estate underlying assets we own, and our exposure to environmental and climate-related risks;
the efficacy and expense of our efforts to manage or hedge credit risk, interest rate risk, and other financial and operational
risks;
changes in credit ratings on assets we own and changes in the rating agencies’ credit rating methodologies;
changes in mortgage prepayment rates;
changes in interest rates;
our ability to redeploy our available capital into new investments;
interest rate volatility, changes in credit spreads, and changes in liquidity in the market for real estate securities and loans;
our ability to finance the acquisition of real estate-related assets with short-term debt;
changes in the values of assets we own;
the ability of counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us;
our exposure to the discontinuation of LIBOR;
our exposure to liquidity risk, risks associated with the use of leverage, and market risks;
changes in the demand from investors for residential and business purpose mortgages and investments, and our ability to
distribute residential and business purpose mortgages through our whole-loan distribution channel;
our involvement in securitization transactions, the profitability of those transactions, and the risks we are exposed to in
engaging in securitization transactions;
exposure to claims and litigation, including litigation arising from our involvement in loan origination and securitization
transactions;
whether we have sufficient liquid assets to meet short-term needs;
our ability to successfully retain or attract key personnel;
changes in our investment, financing, and hedging strategies and new risks we may be exposed to if we expand or reorganize
our business activities;
our exposure to a disruption of our technology infrastructure and systems;
the impact on our reputation that could result from our actions or omissions or from those of others;
our failure to maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
the impact of changes to U.S. federal income tax laws on the U.S. housing market, mortgage finance markets, and our
business;
our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulation, including our ability to obtain or maintain the governmental
licenses;
our ability to maintain our status as a REIT for tax purposes;
limitations imposed on our business due to our REIT status and our status as exempt from registration under the Investment
Company Act of 1940;
our common stock may experience price declines, volatility, and poor liquidity, and we may reduce our dividends in a variety
of circumstances;
decisions about raising, managing, and distributing capital;
our exposure to broad market fluctuations; and
other factors not yet identified.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain statistics and other data that in some cases have been obtained from or compiled
from information made available by servicers and other third-party service providers.
iii
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
PART I
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a specialty finance company focused on several distinct areas of housing
credit. Our operating platforms occupy a unique position in the housing finance value chain, providing liquidity to growing segments
of the U.S. housing market not well served by government programs. We deliver customized housing credit investments to a diverse
mix of investors through our best-in-class securitization platforms, whole-loan distribution activities and our publicly-traded securities.
Our aggregation, origination and investment activities have evolved to incorporate a diverse mix of residential, business purpose and
multifamily assets. Our goal is to provide attractive returns to shareholders through a stable and growing stream of earnings and
dividends, capital appreciation, and a commitment to technological innovation that facilitates risk-minded scale. We operate our
business in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking, and Investment Portfolio.
Our primary sources of income are net interest income from our investments and non-interest income from our mortgage banking
activities. Net interest income consists of the interest income we earn on investments less the interest expense we incur on borrowed
funds and other liabilities. Income from mortgage banking activities is generated through the origination and acquisition of loans, and
their subsequent sale, securitization, or transfer to our investment portfolio.
Redwood Trust, Inc. has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994. We generally refer,
collectively, to Redwood Trust, Inc. and those of its subsidiaries that are not subject to subsidiary-level corporate income tax as “the
REIT” or “our REIT.” We generally refer to subsidiaries of Redwood Trust, Inc. that are subject to subsidiary-level corporate income
tax as “our taxable REIT subsidiaries” or “TRS.” Our mortgage banking activities and investments in mortgage servicing rights
("MSRs") are generally carried out through our taxable REIT subsidiaries, while our portfolio of mortgage- and other real estate-
related investments is primarily held at our REIT. We generally intend to retain profits generated and taxed at our taxable REIT
subsidiaries, and to distribute as dividends at least 90% of the taxable income we generate at our REIT.
Redwood Trust, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Maryland on April 11, 1994, and commenced operations on August 19,
1994. On October 15, 2019, Redwood acquired CoreVest American Finance Lender, LLC and certain affiliated entities ("CoreVest"),
at which time CoreVest became wholly owned by Redwood.
Our executive offices are located at One Belvedere Place, Suite 300, Mill Valley, California 94941. References herein to
“Redwood,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” include Redwood Trust, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
otherwise requires. In statements regarding qualification as a REIT, such terms refer solely to Redwood Trust, Inc.
Financial information concerning our business, both on a consolidated basis and with respect to each of our segments, is set forth
in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data as well as in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations which are included in Part II, Items 8 and 7, respectively, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our Business Segments
We operate our business in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking and Investment
Portfolio. Our two mortgage banking segments generate income from the origination or acquisition of loans and the subsequent sale or
securitization of those loans. Our investment portfolio is comprised of investments sourced through our mortgage banking operations
as well as investments purchased from third-parties and generates income primarily from net interest income and asset appreciation.
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we re-organized our segments to conform with a change in how management manages and
evaluates our operations. Our prior segments presented our operations in a vertically integrated manner, with each operating platform
and the assets it created within a given segment. All retained investments previously held in our Residential Lending and Business
Purpose Lending segments were moved to a newly-created Investment Portfolio Segment, where they are now combined with our
third-party portfolio investments. Our mortgage banking activities are now reflected in standalone Residential Mortgage Banking and
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segments. As such, our segments now separate each of our two operating platforms into separate
segments, and present all of our investments in a single portfolio as a third segment.
1
Following is a further description of our three business segments:
Residential Mortgage Banking
This segment consists of a mortgage loan conduit that acquires residential loans from third-party originators for subsequent sale,
securitization through our Sequoia private-label securitization program, or transfer into our investment portfolio. We typically acquire
prime jumbo mortgages and the related mortgage servicing rights on a flow basis from our network of loan sellers. This segment also
includes various derivative financial instruments that we utilize to manage certain risks associated with our inventory of residential
loans held-for-sale within this segment. This segment’s main source of mortgage banking income is net interest income from its
inventory of loans held-for-sale, as well as income from mortgage banking activities, which includes valuation increases (or gains) on
loans we acquire and subsequently sell, securitize, or transfer into our investment portfolio, and the hedges used to manage risks
associated with these activities. Direct operating expenses and tax expenses associated with these activities are also included in this
segment.
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
This segment consists of a platform that originates and acquires business purpose loans for subsequent securitization, sale, or
transfer into our investment portfolio. We originate single-family rental and bridge loans and typically distribute most of our single-
family rental loans through our CAFLTM private-label securitization program, or on occasion through whole loan sales, and will
transfer our bridge loans to the Investment Portfolio where they will either be retained for investment or securitized. Single-family
rental loans are business purpose mortgage loans to investors in single-family (primarily 1-4 unit) rental properties. Bridge loans are
business purpose mortgage loans to investors rehabilitating and subsequently reselling or renting residential and small-balance
multifamily properties. This segment also includes various derivative financial instruments that we utilize to manage certain risks
associated with our inventory of single-family rental loans held-for-sale. This segment’s main sources of mortgage banking income are
net interest income earned on loans while they are held in inventory, origination fees on loans, mark-to-market adjustments on loans
from the time loans are originated or purchased to when they are sold, securitized or transferred into our investment portfolio, and
gains/losses from associated hedges. Direct operating expenses and tax expenses associated with these activities are also included in
this segment.
Investment Portfolio
This segment consists of investments sourced through our residential and business purpose mortgage banking operations,
including primarily securities retained from our residential and business purpose securitization activities (some of which we
consolidate for GAAP purposes), residential and small-balance multifamily bridge loans, as well as third-party investments including
RMBS issued by third parties (including Agency CRT securities), investments in Freddie Mac K-Series multifamily loan
securitizations and reperforming loan securitizations (both of which we consolidate for GAAP purposes), servicer advance
investments, home equity investments, and other housing-related investments. This segment’s main sources of income are net interest
income and other income from investments, changes in fair value of investments, and realized gains and losses upon the sale of
securities. Direct operating expenses and tax provisions associated with these activities are also included in this segment.
Consolidated Securitization Entities
We sponsor our Sequoia securitization program, which we use for the securitization of residential mortgage loans. We are
required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”) to consolidate the assets and liabilities of
certain Sequoia securitization entities we have sponsored for financial reporting purposes. We refer to certain of these securitization
entities issued prior to 2012 as “consolidated Legacy Sequoia entities,” and the securitization entities formed in connection with the
securitization of Redwood Choice expanded-prime loans and certain Redwood Select prime loans as the "consolidated Sequoia
entities."
We also sponsor our CAFL securitization program, which we use for the securitization of single-family rental and bridge
mortgage loans. We are required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”) to consolidate the
assets and liabilities of CAFL securitization entities we have sponsored for financial reporting purposes. We refer to these
securitization entities as the "consolidated CAFL entities."
In addition. in the third quarter of 2021, we co-sponsored a securitization of home equity investment contracts ("HEIs"). We are
required under GAAP to consolidate the assets and liabilities of this securitization entity we have sponsored for financial reporting
purposes. We refer to this securitization entity as the "Point HEI entity."
We also consolidate certain third-party Freddie Mac K-Series and Freddie Mac Seasoned Loans Structured Transaction ("SLST")
securitization entities that we determined were VIEs and for which we determined we were the primary beneficiary.
2
Where applicable, in analyzing our results of operations, we distinguish results from current operations "at Redwood" and from
consolidated entities. Each of these consolidated entities is independent of Redwood and of each other, and the assets and liabilities of
these entities are not owned by us or legal obligations of ours, respectively, although we are exposed to certain financial risks
associated with any role we carry out for these entities (e.g., as sponsor or depositor) and, to the extent we hold securities issued by, or
other investments in, these entities, we are exposed to the performance of these entities and the assets they hold.
Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)
Redwood’s management, under the oversight of the Board of Directors, formulates Redwood’s strategic and operational approach
to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters and executes on specific ESG initiatives. Redwood’s corporate mission of
helping to make quality housing, whether rented or owned, accessible to all American households is integrated with, and linked to, our
approach to ESG matters at Redwood. Our website includes information regarding ESG matters at Redwood, which we update from
time to time. See “Information Available on Our Website” below. We are currently planning to update the ESG information on our
website to include additional reporting of ESG information under the sector-specific ESG standards published by the Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (the “SASB”).
Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2021, Redwood employed 298 full-time employees, 157 (or 53%) of which are directly engaged in the
operations of our wholly-owned subsidiary, CoreVest, with the remainder spread across our Residential Mortgage Banking,
Investment Portfolio and Corporate functions. Our employees are dispersed across four principal offices in California, Colorado, and
New York. Redwood’s talented employees are core to the sustainability and long-term success of Redwood and we invest in programs
that attract, retain, develop, and care for our people. Cultural priorities and values are closely intertwined with our overarching
business strategy and we believe these priorities support Redwood’s ability to fulfill our mission and contribute to our ongoing focus
on having a strong, healthy culture and a capable and satisfied workforce.
Employee Talent & Development
We are focused on developing and advancing our employees through targeted learning programs that build specific job-based
skills and leadership capabilities across the company. Our Management Essentials program provides foundational leadership training
to all managers of people and our Women’s Leadership Program provides focused development for rising women leaders within the
organization. In addition, we offer a menu of skills-based training for all employees and support for specific ongoing education and
professional certifications. We regularly assess the talent and skills of our workforce and prioritize the promotion or transfer of current
employees for open roles. Feedback and coaching are core to our overall people development programs and our performance
management process is designed to foster specific and frequent performance discussions. Attracting and hiring a qualified and diverse
workforce is a priority, and we strive to create robust and diverse candidate pools for open positions across the company. Our summer
internship program provides opportunities for a diverse group of students while creating a pipeline of future talent for the company.
Employee Satisfaction, Engagement & Retention
We regularly evaluate our ability to attract and retain our employees. In 2021, particularly driven by an increase in our business
purpose lending activities, we hired 107 employees and our voluntary turnover remained relatively low. We believe that the
investments we make in driving a strong, values-based culture and supporting our employees through programs, development, and
competitive pay enhances our organizational capability and has a direct impact on our business results and fulfillment of Redwood’s
mission.
We seek to retain our employees by investing in firm-wide engagement programs and we foster a values and mission based
culture. Our mission, to make quality housing, whether rented or owned, accessible to all American households, guides our day-to-day
work together and serves as a cultural foundation. Our core values of Growth, Results, Passion, Relationships, Innovation, and
Integrity are embedded into our programs and performance goals and are frequently communicated to our employees. We regularly
commission an employee engagement survey to monitor employee sentiment and we follow up with an action planning process to
actively respond to employee feedback. In 2021, we engaged Spencer Stuart to implement a culture and engagement survey. 80% of
our employees reported being highly engaged and conveyed positive perceptions of the organization’s climate and external focus
through the survey. 82% of our workforce reported high satisfaction with their overall employment experience at Redwood and all
survey responses were above Spencer Stuart’s financial services and overall benchmark medians.
3
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging
We are committed to fostering diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (“DEIB”) within the company and we are actively in the
process of implementing our long-term diversity and inclusion roadmap. Our DEIB work is focused on 1) developing and executing
programs and processes that increase the representation of female and racially diverse employees at all levels within the organization;
and 2) investing in programs, training, and mentorship that contribute to an inclusive and equitable work environment for all of our
employees. Our Diversity Steering Committee and Diversity Council, which are overseen by our CEO, inform and steward the
company’s efforts and include leadership and employee representatives from across the organization. Our Diversity Council is
empowered to create relationships with non-profit organizations that support racial equality, including through corporate donations
and volunteerism efforts. We support women’s leadership and development within the organization through targeted training,
mentorship, and collaboration with our women’s employee resource group ("ERG").
Community Giving
Being involved with and giving back to our communities is an important aspect of our culture. We strive to have a positive impact
on the communities where we live and work and support the future development and well-being of our communities. We designate
corporate grants for non-profit organizations and causes that we feel strongly connected to; this has historically included equal housing
and affordability, racial equality, and education. In addition, we have an employee-led foundation that manages and raises funds for a
variety of charitable causes. All employees are invited to participate through various fundraising initiatives and by submitting grant
requests for causes that they are passionate about. Volunteerism is also important at Redwood, and we regularly sponsor community
events and provide paid time off for volunteer activities.
Employee Benefits
We offer a competitive compensation structure to our employees, including short- and long-term financial incentives, generous
health and welfare benefits, paid family leave, and paid time off to promote a healthy work/life balance. In 2021, we implemented a
new suite of housing related benefits which includes reimbursement for mortgage and renters’ insurance. We also offer all employees
the ability to participate in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), which incentivizes stock ownership by our employees by
providing the opportunity to purchase Redwood common stock at a discounted price through payroll deductions.
Competition
We are subject to intense competition in seeking investments, acquiring, originating, and selling loans, engaging in securitization
transactions, and in other aspects of our business. Our competitors include commercial banks, other mortgage REITs, Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, regional and community banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies, other specialty finance companies, financial
institutions, as well as investment funds and other investors in real estate-related assets. In addition, other companies may be formed
that will compete with us. Some of our competitors have greater resources than us and we may not be able to compete successfully
with them. Some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider
a wider variety of investments and establish more favorable relationships than we can. Furthermore, competition for investments,
making loans, acquiring and selling loans, and engaging in securitization transactions may lead to a decrease in the opportunities and
returns available to us. For additional discussion regarding our ability to compete successfully, see the risk factor below under the
heading “We are subject to intense competition and we may not compete successfully" in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
4
Federal and State Regulatory and Legislative Developments
Our business is affected by conditions in the housing, business-purpose, multifamily, and real estate markets and the broader
financial markets, as well as by the financial condition and resources of other participants in these markets. These markets and many
of the participants in these markets are subject to, or regulated under, various federal and state laws and regulations. In some cases, the
government or government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, directly participate in these markets. In
particular, because issues relating to residential real estate and housing finance can be areas of political focus, federal, state and local
governments may be more likely to take actions that affect residential real estate, the markets for financing residential real estate, and
the participants in residential real estate-related industries than they would with respect to other industries. As a result of the
government’s statutory and regulatory oversight of the markets we participate in and the government’s direct and indirect participation
in these markets, federal and state governmental actions, policies, and directives can have an adverse effect on these markets and on
our business and the value of, and the returns on, mortgages, mortgage-related securities, and other assets we own or may acquire in
the future, which effects may be material. For additional discussion regarding federal and state legislative and regulatory
developments, see the risk factor below under the heading “Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments and the actions
of governmental authorities and entities may adversely affect our business and the value of, and the returns on, mortgages, mortgage-
related securities, and other assets we own or may acquire in the future" in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information Available on Our Website
Our website can be found at www.redwoodtrust.com. We make available, free of charge through the investor information section
of our website, access to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well
as proxy statements, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We also make available, free of charge, access to the charters for our Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee, and Governance and Nominating Committee, our Corporate Governance Standards, Policy
Regarding Majority Voting, and our Code of Ethics governing our directors, officers, and employees. Within the time period required
by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we will post on our website any amendment to the Code of Ethics and any waiver
applicable to any executive officer, director, or senior officer (as defined in the Code). In addition, our website includes information
concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors, as well as disclosure relating to certain
non-GAAP financial measures (as defined in the SEC’s Regulation G) that we may make public orally, telephonically, by webcast, by
broadcast, or by similar means from time to time. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our Investor Relations Department can be contacted at One Belvedere Place, Suite 300, Mill Valley, CA 94941, Attn: Investor
Relations, telephone (866) 269-4976 or email investorrelations@redwoodtrust.com.
Certifications
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have executed certifications dated February 25, 2022, as required by
Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and we have included those certifications as exhibits to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on June 15, 2021 that he
was unaware of any violations by Redwood Trust, Inc. of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards in effect as of that date.
5
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Summary of Risk Factors
The risk factors summarized and detailed below could materially harm our business, operating results and/or financial condition,
impair our future prospects and/or cause the price of our common stock to decline. These are not all of the risks we face and other
factors not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business if they occur. Material risks
that may affect our business, operating results and financial condition include, but are not necessarily limited to, those relating to:
Risks Related to our Business and Industry
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
general economic trends and the performance of the housing, real estate, mortgage finance, and broader financial markets;
federal and state legislative and regulatory developments and the actions of governmental authorities and entities;
changing benchmark interest rates, and the Federal Reserve’s actions and statements regarding monetary policy;
our ability to compete successfully;
our ability to adapt our business model and strategies to changing circumstances;
strategic business and capital deployment decisions we make;
our use of financial leverage;
our exposure to a breach of our cybersecurity or data security;
Risks Related to our Investments and Investing Activity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our exposure to credit risk and the timing of credit losses within our portfolio;
the concentration of the credit risks we are exposed to, including due to the structure of assets we hold and the geographical
concentration of real estate underlying assets we own, and our exposure to environmental and climate-related risks;
the efficacy and expense of our efforts to manage or hedge credit risk, interest rate risk, and other financial and operational
risks;
changes in credit ratings on assets we own and changes in the rating agencies’ credit rating methodologies;
changes in mortgage prepayment rates;
changes in interest rates;
our ability to redeploy our available capital into new investments;
interest rate volatility, changes in credit spreads, and changes in liquidity in the market for real estate securities and loans;
our ability to finance the acquisition of real estate-related assets with short-term debt;
changes in the values of assets we own;
the ability of counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us;
our exposure to the discontinuation of LIBOR;
our exposure to liquidity risk, risks associated with the use of leverage (including that margin calls may force us to sell assets
under adverse market conditions), and market risks;
foreclosure activity may expose us to risks associated with real estate ownership and operation;
we may enter into new lines of business, acquire other companies, or engage in other new strategic initiatives;
Operational and Other Risks
•
•
•
•
changes in the demand from investors for residential and business purpose mortgages and investments, and our ability to
distribute residential and business purpose mortgages through our whole-loan distribution channel;
our involvement in securitization transactions, the profitability of those transactions, and the risks we are exposed to in
engaging in securitization transactions;
exposure to claims and litigation, including litigation arising from our involvement in loan origination and securitization
transactions;
whether we have sufficient liquid assets to meet short-term needs;
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to successfully retain or attract key personnel;
changes in our investment, financing, and hedging strategies and new risks we may be exposed to if we expand or reorganize
our business activities;
our exposure to a disruption of our technology infrastructure and systems;
the impact on our reputation that could result from our actions or omissions or from those of others;
our failure to maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
accounting rules related to certain of our transactions and asset valuations are highly complex and involve significant
judgment and assumptions;
we are dependent on third-party information systems and third-party service providers; system failures or cybersecurity
incidents could disrupt our business;
Risks Related to Legislative and Regulatory Matters Affecting our Industry
•
•
the impact of changes to U.S. federal income tax laws on the U.S. housing market, mortgage finance markets, and our
business;
our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulation, including our ability to obtain or maintain the governmental
licenses;
Risks Related to Redwood's Capital, REIT and Legal/Organizational Structure
•
•
our ability to maintain our status as a REIT for tax purposes;
limitations imposed on our business due to our REIT status and our status as exempt from registration under the Investment
Company Act of 1940;
Other Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
•
•
•
•
our common stock may experience losses, volatility, and poor liquidity, and we may reduce our dividends in a variety of
circumstances;
decisions about raising, managing, and distributing capital;
our exposure to broad market fluctuations; and
other factors not yet identified.
7
Risk Related to our Business and Industry
The spread of COVID-19 has disrupted, and could further cause severe disruptions in, the U.S. and global economy and financial
markets. Our financial condition and core aspects of our business operations have been and may continue to be adversely affected
or disrupted by public health issues, including epidemics or pandemics such as COVID-19.
The COVID-19 pandemic (the "pandemic") has caused, and is continuing to cause, significant repercussions across regional, national
and global economies and financial markets. The pandemic and governmental programs created as a response to the pandemic have at
times significantly curtailed global economic activity and caused significant volatility and disruption in global financial markets. The
pandemic and efforts taken in response to it have affected, and continue to affect, the core aspects of our business, including the
acquisition, origination and distribution of mortgages, activities and valuations within our investment portfolio, our liquidity, and our
employees. However, the full extent to which the pandemic will impact our operations will depend on future developments, including
the duration and severity of the pandemic, any subsequent outbreaks or surges in cases of the virus or any related variants, and the
efficacy and adoption of available vaccines.
The pandemic has impacted, and may continue to impact, our mortgage banking operations. As a result of government measures taken
to slow the spread of the disease (such as temporary business closures, shelter-in-place orders, quarantines and travel restrictions), as
well as recurring waves or surges in infection rates and the discovery and proliferation of new disease mutations or “variants”, many
businesses have been forced to close, furlough, and lay off employees, and U.S. unemployment claims have dramatically risen and
remained elevated at times since the start of the pandemic. To the extent cases surge in any locations, stringent limitations on daily
activities that may have been eased previously could be reinstated in those areas. If the pandemic leads to another prolonged economic
downturn with sustained high unemployment rates, we would anticipate real estate financing transactions to decrease, which may
materially decrease the volume of mortgages we acquire, originate and distribute. Further, in light of the impact of the pandemic on
the overall economy, including with respect to unemployment levels and consumer behavior related to loans and tenancies, as well as
government policies and pronouncements, borrowers have, at times, experienced, and may again experience, difficulties meeting their
obligations and have sought or may seek to forbear payment on their loans, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
Future government-sponsored liquidity or stimulus programs in response to the pandemic, if any, may not be available to our
borrowers or us and, if available, may nevertheless be insufficient to address the impacts of the pandemic. Thus, the credit risk profile
of our assets may be more pronounced during severe market disruptions in the mortgage, housing or related sectors. Additionally,
interest rates could decline materially and/or credit spreads could widen as a result of increased demand for U.S. Treasury securities
and/or activities the Federal Reserve takes in response to macroeconomic events, such as those taken during the pandemic, either or
both of which could cause prepayments on our assets to increase due to refinancing activity or asset values to decrease, which could
have a material effect on our results of operations.
The pandemic has impacted, and may again impact, our access to the capital markets and our liquidity. Pandemic-related disruptions
to the normal operation of mortgage finance markets have impacted, and may continue to impact, our mortgage banking operations by,
among other factors, limiting access to short-term or long-term financing for mortgage loans, disrupting the market for securitization
transactions, or restricting our ability to access these markets or execute securitization transactions. In addition, we finance many of
the mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other real estate assets in our investment portfolio with borrowings under loan
warehouse facilities, securities repurchase facilities, and other financing arrangements. Given the broad and unpredictable impact of
the pandemic on the financial markets, specific details around our future ability to finance our investment portfolio are unknowable.
Our liquidity could also be impacted as our lenders reassess their exposure to mortgage-related investments and either curtail access to
uncommitted financing capacity or impose higher costs to access such capacity. For example, see the risk factor below under the
heading “Our use of financial leverage exposes us to increased risks, including liquidity risks from margin calls and potential
breaches of the financial covenants under our borrowing facilities, which could result in our being required to immediately repay all
outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to use for future financing needs, as well as
triggering cross-defaults under other debt agreements.” Our liquidity may be further constrained as there may be less demand by
investors to acquire mortgage loans we originate or acquire for re-sale, mortgage-backed securities we issue, including through our
SEMT™ and CAFL™ securitization platforms, or other assets we own or may acquire in the future.
Further, the pandemic has affected, and may continue to affect the availability and/or productivity of our team members. As a result of
the pandemic, we transitioned to a predominantly remote working environment for the majority of our team members. More recently,
we have undertaken a limited reopening of our physical office locations and continue to use hybrid work arrangements in certain
circumstances. Given the broad and unpredictable impact of the pandemic on our team members’ ability to work in-person, our ability
to maintain hybrid work arrangements or to transition to predominately in-person work environments is unknown. In addition, over
time such remote operations may decrease the cohesiveness of our teams and our ability to maintain our culture, both of which are
integral to our success. Additionally, a remote working environment may impede our ability to undertake new business projects, to
foster a creative environment, to hire new team members and to retain existing team members. Certain job functions and roles require
8
in-person work on a full- or part-time basis, making the continuation of any remote or hybrid work arrangements a risk to our
operations.
The rapid development and fluidity of the circumstances resulting from the pandemic precludes any prediction as to the ultimate
adverse impact of the pandemic. If new strains or variants of COVID-19 develop or sufficient amounts of vaccines or treatments are
not available, not widely administered, or otherwise prove ineffective, the impact of the pandemic on the global economy and, in turn,
on our financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations could be material. Moreover, each of the risk factors discussed below is
likely to also be impacted directly or indirectly by the ongoing impact of the pandemic. The pandemic and the current financial,
economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas present material uncertainty and risk
with respect to our performance, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
General economic developments and trends and the performance of the housing, real estate, mortgage finance, and broader
financial markets may adversely affect our business and the value of, and returns on, real estate-related and other assets we own or
may acquire and could also negatively impact our business and financial results.
Our level of business activity and the profitability of our business, as well as the values of, and the cash flows from, the assets we own,
are affected by developments in the U.S. economy and the broader global economy. As a result, negative economic developments are
likely to negatively impact our business and financial results. There are a number of factors that could contribute to negative economic
developments, including, but not limited to, U.S. fiscal and monetary policy changes, including Federal Reserve policy shifts and
changes in benchmark interest rates, changing U.S. consumer spending patterns, negative developments in the housing, single-family
rental (SFR), multifamily, and real estate markets, rising unemployment, rising government debt levels, changing expectations for, or
the occurrence of, inflation and deflation, or adverse global political and economic events, such as the outbreak of pandemic, epidemic
disease, or warfare (including the recent outbreak of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine).
Financial markets have experienced significant volatility as a result of the pandemic and, more recently, due to the discovery and
spread of new virus variants both internationally and domestically. Many state and local jurisdictions have at times enacted, and re-
enacted, measures requiring closure of businesses, restrictions on travel, and other economically restrictive efforts to combat the
pandemic. At times during the pandemic, unemployment levels have increased significantly and may increase again, remain at
elevated levels and/or continue to rise. Similarly, at times during the pandemic, the rate and number of mortgage payment and rental
payment delinquencies were significantly elevated and may increase again, and housing market fundamentals may be adversely
affected, leading to an overall material adverse decrease in our mortgage loan acquisition and origination platforms and investment
portfolio. See the risk factor above under the heading “The COVID-19 pandemic, the future outbreak of another highly infectious or
contagious disease, or other unforeseen disaster could adversely impact or cause disruption to our financial condition and core
aspects of our business operations. The spread of COVID-19 has disrupted, and could further cause severe disruptions in, the U.S.
and global economy and financial markets and create widespread business continuity and viability issues.”
Rising inflation and elevated U.S. budget deficits and overall debt levels, including as a result of federal pandemic relief and stimulus
legislation and/or economic or market and supply chain conditions, can put upward pressure on interest rates and could be among the
factors that could lead to higher interest rates in the future. Higher interest rates could adversely affect our overall business, income,
and our ability to pay dividends, including by reducing the fair value of many of our assets. This may affect our earnings results,
reduce our ability to securitize, re-securitize, or sell our assets, or reduce our liquidity. Higher interest rates could also reduce the
ability of borrowers to make interest payments or to refinance their loans underlying our RMBS investments. See the risk factor below
under the heading “Interest rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us and could lead to reduced earnings and increased
volatility in our earnings.” Furthermore, our business and financial results may be harmed by our inability to accurately anticipate
developments associated with changes in, or the outlook for, interest rates.
Real estate values, and the ability to generate returns by owning or taking credit risk on loans secured by real estate, are important to
our business. The government’s support of mortgage markets through its support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has contributed to
Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s continued dominance of mortgage finance and securitization activity, inhibiting the growth of private
sector mortgage securitization. This support may continue for some time and could have potentially negative consequences to us, since
we have traditionally taken an active role in assuming credit risk in the private sector mortgage market, including through investments
in Sequoia securitizations we sponsor. Congress and executive branch officials have periodically proposed various plans for reform of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (and the broader role of the government in the U.S. mortgage markets); however, it is unclear which
reforms will ultimately be implemented, if any, what the time frame for any such reform would be, and what the impact on our
business would be.
9
Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments and the actions of governmental authorities and entities may adversely
affect our business and the value of, and the returns on, mortgages, mortgage-related securities, and other assets we own or may
acquire in the future.
As noted above, our business is affected by conditions in the housing, business purpose, multifamily, and real estate markets and the
broader financial markets, as well as by the financial condition and resources of other participants in these markets. These markets and
many of the participants in these markets are subject to, or regulated under, various federal and state laws and regulations. In some
cases, the government or government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, directly participate in these markets. In
particular, because issues relating to residential housing and real estate finance can be areas of political focus, federal, state and local
governments may be more likely to take actions that affect residential housing, the markets for financing residential housing, and the
participants in residential housing-related industries than they would with respect to other industries. As a result of the government’s
statutory and regulatory oversight of the markets we participate in and the government’s direct and indirect participation in these
markets, federal and state governmental actions, policies, and directives can have an adverse effect on these markets and on our
business and the value of, and the returns on, mortgages, mortgage-related securities, and other assets we own or may acquire in the
future, which effects may be material.
For example, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming loan limits increased significantly on January 1, 2022. These increases, as well
as future increases in conforming loan limits, may adversely impact the amount and/or value of non-Agency loans available for
purchase, which could have a material adverse effect on our residential business.
Furthermore, as a result of the economic and market disruption caused by the pandemic, federal and state governmental authorities
encouraged and, in certain cases, mandated, responses to forbearance requests from borrowers with respect to monthly mortgage
payment obligations by enacting statutes, including the CARES Act enacted by Congress, and promulgating various orders,
regulations, and guidance to enable borrowers to defer and reschedule monthly mortgage payments, coupled with enacting or
extending nationwide and/or local foreclosure and eviction moratoria. As another example, the financial crisis of 2007-2008 and
subsequent financial turmoil prompted the federal government to put into place new statutory and regulatory frameworks and policies
for reforming the U.S. financial system. These financial reforms are aimed at, among other things, promoting robust supervision and
regulation of financial firms and financial markets, and protecting consumers and investors from abusive or predatory financial
practices. Certain financial reforms focused specifically on the issuance of asset-backed securities through securitization transactions
include significantly enhanced disclosure requirements, risk retention requirements, and rules restricting a broad range of conflicts of
interests in regard to these transactions. Implementation of financial reforms, whether through law, regulations, or policy, including
changes to the manner in which financial institutions, financial products, and financial markets operate and are regulated and any
related changes in the accounting standards that govern them, could adversely affect our business and financial results by subjecting us
to regulatory oversight, making it more expensive to conduct our business, reducing or eliminating any competitive advantage we may
have, or limiting our ability to expand, or could have other adverse effects on us. Moreover, federal policy changes aimed at enhancing
regulatory scrutiny and enforcement priorities around mortgage servicing, including by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
("CFPB"), could further increase our compliance costs.
Ultimately, we cannot assure you of the impact that governmental actions may have on our business or the financial markets and, in
fact, they may adversely affect us, possibly materially. We cannot predict whether or when such actions may occur or what unintended
or unanticipated impacts, if any, such actions could have on our business and financial results. Even after governmental actions have
been taken and we believe we understand the impacts of those actions, prevailing interpretations may shift, or we may not be able to
effectively respond to them so as to avoid a negative impact on our business or financial results.
Changing benchmark interest rates, and the Federal Reserve’s actions and statements regarding monetary policy, can affect the
fixed income and mortgage finance markets in ways that could adversely affect our future business and financial results and the
value of, and returns on, real estate-related investments and other assets we own or may acquire.
Actions taken by the Federal Reserve to set or adjust monetary policy, and statements it makes regarding monetary policy, may affect
the expectations and outlooks of market participants in ways that disrupt our business and adversely affect the value of, and returns on,
our portfolio of real-estate related investments and the pipeline of mortgage loans we own or may originate or acquire. For example,
the Federal Reserve has signaled its expectation to tighten monetary policy during 2022 by decelerating and terminating its program to
purchase Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and increasing the federal funds rate several times over the next year due to
rising inflation and tight labor market conditions, among other reasons. Increasing rates generally reduce mortgage loan origination
volumes, particularly the volume of mortgage refinancings.
To the extent benchmark interest rates rise, one of the immediate potential impacts on our business would be a reduction in the overall
value of the pool of mortgage loans that we own and the overall value of the pipeline of mortgage loans that we have identified for
10
origination or purchase. Rising benchmark interest rates also generally have a negative impact on the overall cost of short- and long-
term borrowings we use to finance our acquisitions and holdings of mortgage loans, including existing adjustable-rate borrowings and
potential future borrowings, and as a result of the requirement to post additional margin (or collateral) to lenders to offset any
associated decline in value of the mortgage loans we finance with short-term borrowings subject to market value-based margin calls.
Most of the short-term borrowing facilities we use to finance our acquisitions and holdings of mortgage loans are uncommitted and all
such short-term facilities have a limited term, which could result in these types of borrowings not being available in the future to fund
our acquisitions and holdings and could result in our being required to sell holdings of mortgage loans and incur losses. Similar
impacts would also be expected with respect to the short-term borrowings we use to finance our acquisitions and holdings of
residential, business purpose, and multifamily MBS. In addition, any inability to fund originations or acquisitions of mortgage loans
could damage our reputation as a reliable counterparty in the mortgage finance markets.
To the extent benchmark interest rates rise, it would also likely impact the volume of mortgage loans available for purchase in the
marketplace and our ability to compete to acquire or originate mortgage loans as part of our mortgage banking activities. These
impacts could result from, among other things, a lower overall volume of mortgage refinance activity by mortgage borrowers and an
increased level of competition from large commercial banks that may operate with a lower cost of capital than we do, including as a
result of Federal Reserve monetary policies that impact banks more favorably than us and other non-bank institutions. In addition, if
the Federal Reserve decelerates or terminates its MBS purchasing program, it could have a negative impact on, among other things,
MBS pricing and liquidity both within and outside of the Agency sector. These and other impacts of developments of the type
described above may have a negative impact on our business and results of operations and we cannot accurately predict the full extent
of these impacts or for how long they may persist.
We are subject to intense competition and we may not compete successfully.
We are subject to intense competition in seeking investments, acquiring, originating, and selling loans, engaging in securitization
transactions, and in other aspects of our business. Our competitors include commercial banks, other mortgage REITs, Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, regional and community banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies, other specialty finance companies, financial
institutions, as well as investment funds, venture capital investors, and other investors in real estate-related assets. In addition, other
companies may be formed that will compete with us. Some of our competitors have greater resources than us and we may not be able
to compete successfully with them. Some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which
could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more favorable relationships than we can. Furthermore,
competition for investments, making loans, acquiring and selling loans, and engaging in securitization transactions may lead to a
decrease in the opportunities and returns available to us.
In addition, there are significant competitive threats to our business from governmental actions and initiatives that have already been
undertaken or which may be undertaken in the future. Sustained competition from governmental actions and initiatives could have a
material adverse effect on us. For example, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are, among other things, engaged in the business of
acquiring loans and engaging in securitization transactions. Until 2008, competition from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was limited to
some extent due to the fact that they were statutorily prohibited from purchasing loans for single unit residences in the continental
United States with a principal amount in excess of $417,000, while much of our business had historically focused on acquiring
residential loans with a principal amount in excess of that amount. Since 2008, this loan size limit has been elevated above the
historical loan size limit, and as of January 1, 2022, the maximum loan size limit was $970,800 for loans made to secure singe unit real
estate purchases in certain high-cost areas of the U.S.
In addition, since 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been in conservatorship and have become, in effect, instruments of the
U.S. federal government. It is unclear whether any future federal legislation or executive or regulatory actions regarding Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac will continue to maintain, or increase, the role of those entities in the housing finance market. As long as there is
governmental support for these entities to continue to operate and provide financing to a significant portion of the mortgage finance
market, they will represent significant business competition due to, among other things, their large size and low cost of funding.
To the extent that laws, regulations, or policies governing the business activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not changed to
limit their role in housing finance (such as a change in these loan size limits or in the guarantee fees they charge), the competition
from these two governmental entities will remain significant or could increase. In addition, to the extent that property values decline
while these loan size limits remain the same, it may have the same effect as an increase in this limit, as a greater percentage of loans
would likely be within the size limit. Any increase in the loan size limit, or in the overall percentage of loans that are within the limit,
allows Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to compete against us to a greater extent than they had been able to compete previously and our
business could be adversely affected. Additionally, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) guarantee qualified residential mortgages, and FHA and VA loans accounted for approximately 19% of the aggregate
dollar value of residential loans originated in the U.S. in 2020. The federal government’s ability to provide financing to a significant
11
portion of the mortgage finance market through these entities represents significant business competition due to, among other things,
their size and low cost of funding.
Our business model and business strategies, and the actions we take (or fail to take) to implement them and adapt them to
changing circumstances involve risk and may not be successful.
U.S. real estate markets, the mortgage industry and the related capital markets have undergone significant changes since the U.S.
financial crisis of 2007-08, including due to the significant governmental interventions in these areas and changes to the laws and
regulations that govern the banking and mortgage finance industry. Additionally, it remains unclear how any future federal legislation
or executive or regulatory actions regarding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the housing finance market more broadly will impact
that market and our business. Additional factors, including a rising or steady interest rate environment, which may cause the volume of
refinance loans to decline, and secular trends in consumer demand for renting versus owning a residence, may also contribute to
evolving conditions in the mortgage industry and capital markets. Our methods of, and model for, doing business and financing our
investments are changing and if we fail to develop, enhance, and implement strategies to adapt to changing conditions in the mortgage
finance industry and capital markets, our business and financial results may be adversely affected. Furthermore, changes we make to
our business to respond to changing circumstances may expose us to new or different risks than those to which we were previously
exposed, and we may not effectively identify or manage those risks. Further discussion is set forth in the risk factor titled “Decisions
we make about our business strategy and investments, as well as decisions about raising capital or returning capital to shareholders
(through dividends or common stock repurchases), could fail to improve our business and results of operations.”
Similarly, the competitive landscape in which we operate and the products and investments for which we compete are also affected by
changing conditions. There may be trends or sudden changes in our industry or regulatory environment, changes in the role of
government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, changes in the role of credit rating agencies or their rating
criteria or processes, or changes in the U.S. economy more generally. If we do not effectively respond to these changes or if our
strategies to respond to these changes are not successful, our ability to effectively compete in the marketplace may be negatively
impacted, which would likely result in our business and financial results being adversely affected.
We have historically depended upon the issuance of mortgage-backed securities by the securitization entities we sponsor as a funding
source for our residential and business purpose mortgage business. However, due to market conditions, between 2008 and 2011 our
mortgage securitization activity was extremely limited. While we have engaged in numerous residential and business purpose
mortgage securitization transactions since 2012, the amount of securitization activity we engage in varies from year to year, and we do
not know if market conditions will allow us to continue to regularly engage in these types of securitization transactions. Additionally,
in 2021 we co-sponsored a first-of-its-kind securitization of residential home equity investment options (“HEIs”), and subsequently
increased our purchase commitment to acquire additional HEIs, with the expectation that we would continue to aggregate HEIs for
future securitization. Any disruption of these securitization markets may adversely affect our earnings and growth. Even if regular
residential and business purpose mortgage loan securitization activity continues among market participants other than government-
sponsored entities, we do not know if it will continue to be on terms and conditions that will permit us to participate or be favorable to
us. And even if conditions are favorable to us, we may not be able to sustain the volume of securitization activity we previously
conducted. Additionally, securities collateralized by business purpose loans such as those issued by our CoreVest subsidiaries make up
a small portion of the total volume of mortgage-backed securities issuance, and the market for securities collateralized by HEIs has
only recently come into existence. The markets for such securities are not as mature as the market for residential mortgage-backed
securities and dislocations in these markets or a change in the risk tolerance of investors or the perception of risk related to business
purpose mortgage-backed securities or HEI-backed securities may negatively impact our ability to grow or sustain the volume of
business purpose mortgage-backed or HEI-backed securitization transactions we engage in, which may result in our business and
financial results being adversely affected.
Decisions we make about our business strategy and investments, as well as decisions about raising capital or returning capital to
shareholders (through dividends or common stock repurchases), could fail to improve our business and results of operations.
Over recent years, we have announced several new initiatives to expand our mortgage banking activities and alter our investment
portfolio, including by expanding our mortgage banking activities to include, for example, acquiring and originating loans secured by
non-owner occupied rental properties generally made up of one to four units and residential bridge loans (which we collectively refer
to as “business purpose” real estate loans), and optimizing the size and target returns of our investment portfolio. As examples, during
2019, we completed the acquisitions of two business purpose real estate loan origination platforms, CoreVest and 5 Arches, LLC ("5
Arches"), which we combined into a single platform, through which we now originate business purpose loans. Other new investment
initiatives include investing in residential securities collateralized by re-performing and non-performing mortgage loans, multifamily
loans and securities, HEIs, investments in excess mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") and servicer advance investments related to
pools of residential and small-balance multifamily mortgage loans, and a multifamily investment fund to acquire workforce housing
properties. We also occasionally sell lower-yielding securities in our investment portfolio in order to redeploy capital into higher-
12
yielding securities as part of our portfolio and capital management strategies. In addition, in 2021, we announced our RWT
Horizons™ venture investing initiative, through which we invest in early-stage companies strategically aligned with our business
across the lending, real estate, and financial technology sectors to drive innovations across our residential and business-purpose
lending platforms.
These new initiatives are intended to grow our mortgage banking business and enhance our investment portfolio, allocate capital to
profitable business and investment opportunities, and support innovation in real estate and financial technology. These initiatives are
premised on our outlook for economic and market conditions, secular trends in consumer demand for housing, as well as competitive
considerations. Over the long-term, the assumptions underlying these trends and changes, or assumptions regarding the risk profile of
these initiatives and investments, could turn out to be incorrect or economic and market conditions could develop in a manner that is
not consistent with our assumptions. For example, during 2020, the composition of our investment portfolio changed significantly as a
result of asset sales undertaken in response to the financing market disruptions resulting from the pandemic. As a result, the risk
profile of the assets held in our investment portfolio is materially different than it was prior to onset of the pandemic. Moreover, we
may determine to undertake significant additional asset sales in the future, including in response to adverse economic or financial
market conditions. If we are unable to adapt our strategic and capital deployment decisions and maintain an appropriately diversified
investment portfolio, our achievement of growth and revenue goals, our profitability, and competitiveness in the market may be
adversely impacted.
Additionally, these initiatives may have more risks, and different risks, than our traditional mortgage banking activities and investment
portfolio. For example, our portfolio and capital management strategies may include selling securities and reinvesting in securities
with greater exposure to credit risk due to their structural credit enhancement of senior securities, as well as more limited payment
histories. As another example, investing in HEIs, investing directly in multifamily workforce housing properties, and originating and
investing in business purpose mortgage loans exposes us to new and different risks than our traditional residential mortgage banking
activities, including potential uncertainty with respect to regulatory matters or litigation, with respect to HEIs and multifamily housing,
and higher rates of delinquency, default, foreclosure and litigation, with respect to business purpose mortgage loans. Our RWT
Horizons™ venture investing initiative also exposes us to new and different risks, including risks related to making equity investments
in early-stage companies that may not have substantial operating histories. As a result, these new initiatives could fail to improve the
long-term profitability of Redwood, could fail to result in capital being available for or deployed into more profitable businesses and
investments, could result in dilutive issuances of equity or debt securities convertible into equity to fund our business and investment
activities, or could otherwise damage our business, our reputation, our ability to access financing, and our ability to raise capital, or
could have other unforeseen consequences, any or all of which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations in the future. Decisions we make in the future about our business strategy and investments, as well as decisions about
raising capital or returning capital to shareholders (through dividends or common stock repurchases), could also fail to improve our
business and results of operations.
Our Board of Directors has approved authorizations for the repurchase of Redwood common stock and convertible and exchangeable
debt securities issued by Redwood. In 2020, we repurchased approximately $22 million of our common stock at an average price of
$7.10 and approximately $125 million of our outstanding debt securities. At December 31, 2021, approximately $78 million of this
current authorization remained available for the repurchase of shares of our common stock. If we repurchase shares of Redwood
common stock or other securities issued by Redwood, it is because at the time we believe the shares or securities are trading at
attractive levels relative to other uses of capital or investment opportunities then available to us; however, it is possible that other uses
of this capital could have been more accretive to our earnings or book value or that subsequent capital needs arise that were not
contemplated at the time we made these decisions. Our past and future decisions relating to the repurchases of Redwood common
stock or other securities issued by Redwood could fail to improve our results of operations or could negatively impact our ability to
execute our business plans, meet financial obligations, access financing, or raise additional capital, any or all of which could result in a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, we periodically raise capital by issuing common stock, or debt securities convertible into common stock, through
underwritten public offerings, in at-the-market ("ATM") offerings, under our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan, or
in private placement transactions. In addition, we may issue additional shares of common stock upon conversion of our convertible
debt or upon exchange of our exchangeable debt, to our directors, officers and employees under our employee stock purchase plan and
our incentive plan, including upon the exercise of, or in respect of, distributions on equity awards previously granted thereunder, and
to fund merger and acquisition activity. It may not be possible for existing stockholders to participate in future share issuances, which
may dilute existing stockholders’ interests in us. To the extent we raise capital to fund our operations and investment activities, our
approach to raising capital is based on what we believe to be in the best interests of the company. However, it is possible that our use
of the proceeds of such capital raising transactions may not yield a significant return or any return at all for our stockholders. If we are
not able to make prudent decisions about raising, managing, and distributing our capital, our business and financial results may be
adversely impacted.
13
Our use of financial leverage exposes us to increased risks, including liquidity risks from margin calls and potential breaches of
the financial covenants under our borrowing facilities, which could result in our being required to immediately repay all
outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to use for future financing needs, as
well as triggering cross-defaults under other debt agreements.
We use a variety of borrowing facilities and derivatives agreements to fund or hedge assets in our investment portfolio that present us
with liquidity risks. Under our borrowing facilities, interest rate swaps and other derivatives agreements, we pledge assets as security
for our payment obligations and make various representations and warranties and agree to certain covenants, events of default, and
other terms. In addition, many of our borrowing facilities are uncommitted, meaning that each time we request a new borrowing under
such a facility, the lender has the option to decline to extend credit to us. The terms of these facilities and agreements typically include
financial covenants (such as covenants to maintain a minimum amount of tangible net worth or stockholders’ equity and/or a
minimum amount of liquid assets and/or a maximum ratio of recourse debt to equity), margin requirements (which typically require us
to pledge additional collateral if and when the value of previously pledged collateral declines), operating covenants (such as covenants
to conduct our business in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and covenants to provide notice of certain events to
creditors), representations and warranties (such as representations and warranties relating to characteristics of pledged collateral, our
exposure to litigation and/or regulatory enforcement actions and the absence of material adverse changes to our financial condition,
our operations, or our business prospects), and events of default (such as a breach of covenant or representation/warranty and cross-
defaults, under which an event of default is triggered under a borrowing facility if an event of default or similar event occurs under
another borrowing facility).
For example, due to volatility in financial markets resulting from the pandemic, the market value of loans and securities financed
under our borrowing facilities declined significantly in the first half of 2020; in particular, over a compressed time frame near end of
the first quarter of 2020. As a result, we received a material increase in margin calls from counterparties under these facilities. We
satisfied these margins calls by pledging additional collateral, such as cash or additional loans or securities, with a value equal to the
decline in value of the collateral, adjusted for the percentage of the asset value financed (our haircut percentage). In some cases, we
sold assets under adverse market conditions to generate liquidity in response to such margin calls. Margin calls expose us to a number
of significant risks, including that we may be unable to meet these margin calls, we may again sell assets under adverse market
conditions in response to such margin calls, or we may breach financial covenants under our borrowing facilities requiring
maintenance of a minimum amount of liquid assets, as a result of a decrease in the values of the assets pledged as collateral.
Additionally, significant and widespread decreases in the fair values of our assets could cause us to breach the financial covenants
under our borrowing facilities related to net worth and leverage. Such covenants, if breached, can result in our being required to
immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to use for future
financing needs, as well as triggering cross-defaults under other borrowing agreements. During 2020, we amended financial covenants
in several borrowing agreements and remained in compliance; however, we cannot be certain whether we will continue to be able to
remain in compliance with these financial covenants, or whether our financing counterparties will negotiate terms or agreements in
respect of these financial covenants in the future.
Our borrowing facilities also contain representations and warranties related to litigation that could be breached if we are subject to
litigation proceedings and claims in excess of specified dollar thresholds or that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
For example, in connection with the impact of the pandemic on the non-Agency mortgage finance market and on our business and
operations, a number of the counterparties that have regularly sold residential mortgage loans to us believed that we breached
perceived obligations to them, and requested or demanded that we purchase loans from them and/or compensate them for perceived
damages resulting from our decisions in the first half of 2020 not to purchase certain loans from them. One of these counterparties
subjected us to litigation and others made demands regarding perceived obligations to them. If the individual or aggregate amount of
such litigation or any threatened litigation exceeded specified dollar thresholds or could have had a material adverse effect on our
business, we could have breached representations and warranties under our borrowing agreements, which breach could result in our
being required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to
use for future financing needs, as well as triggering cross-defaults under other borrowing agreements.
Volatility in the mortgage credit markets, including continued volatility due to the pandemic, may cause the market value of loans and
securities we own subject to financing to decline again, and our financing counterparties may make additional margin calls.
Furthermore, if other market participants fail to meet margin calls associated with mortgage loans or securities they finance, their
financing counterparties could terminate their financing and seek to sell significant amounts of loans and securities, which could again
depress the market value of these types of assets and result in additional margin calls on us and other borrowers. Additionally,
securities financed under our short-term securities repurchase facilities, and loans financed under certain whole-loan warehouse/
secured revolving borrowing facilities, are subject to mark-to-market treatment and may incur margin calls or may require us to
repurchase such loans in the event the loans become delinquent. We may receive additional margin calls in the future and there is no
14
assurance that we will be able to meet such margin calls. We may experience an event of default under some or all of our short- and
long-term debt and financing facilities if we do not meet future margin calls or maintain compliance with financial covenants and
other terms of these debt obligations, which would permit the holders of the affected indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of such
indebtedness and could cause defaults under our other indebtedness, which could lead to an event of bankruptcy or insolvency, which
would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, at the end of the fixed period applicable to the financing of a security under a securities repurchase facility (which
generally does not exceed 90 days), we may request the same counterparty to renew the financing for an additional fixed period. If the
same counterparty renews the financing, it may not be on terms that are as favorable to us as the expiring financing and the
counterparty may require us to post additional collateral to renew the financing (which requirement would impact our liquidity in the
same manner as a margin call). If the same counterparty does not renew the financing, it may be difficult for us to obtain financing for
that security under one of our other securities repurchase facilities, due to the fact that the financial institution counterparties to our
securities repurchase facilities generally only provide financing for securities that we purchased from them or one of their affiliates. If
we are not able to obtain additional financing when we need it, we could be exposed to liquidity risks of the types described above.
Our use of leverage increases our exposure to liquidity risks, including liquidity risks related to unforeseen economic developments
such as the pandemic, and may adversely impact our liquidity, cash balances, and financial results. For additional information
regarding our exposure to liquidity risks and other risks related to our use of leverage, refer to Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K under the headings “Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities” and “Margin
Call Provisions Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing”.
Maintaining cybersecurity and data security and complying with data privacy laws and regulations are important to our business
and a breach of our cybersecurity or data security or a violation of law could result in serious harm to our reputation and have a
material adverse impact on our business and financial results.
When we acquire or originate real estate mortgage loans, or the rights to service mortgage loans, we come into possession of non-
public borrower or borrower-principal personal information that an identity thief could utilize in engaging in fraudulent activity or
theft. We may share this information with third parties, such as loan sub-servicers, outside vendors, third parties interested in acquiring
such loans from us, or lenders extending credit to us collateralized by such loans. We have acquired more than 100,000 residential
mortgage loans and rights to service residential mortgage loans since 2010 and have also acquired or originated thousands of these or
other types of mortgage loans (including business purpose loans) prior to and following 2010.
While we have security measures in place to protect this information and prevent security breaches, such measures may be inadequate
in protecting against threats, or these security measures may be compromised as a result of third-party action, including intentional
misconduct by computer hackers, cyber-attacks, "phishing", social engineering, or ransomware attacks, service provider or vendor
error, or malfeasance or other intentional or unintentional acts by third parties and bad actors, including third-party service providers.
Furthermore, borrower data, including personally identifiable information, may be lost, exposed, or subject to unauthorized access or
use as a result of accidents, errors, or malfeasance by our employees, independent contractors, or others working with us or on our
behalf. Our servers and systems, and those of our service providers, may be vulnerable to computer malware, break-ins, denial-of-
service attacks, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could result in someone
obtaining unauthorized access to borrowers’ data, other personal information, or our data, including confidential business information.
In the past, we have experienced unauthorized access to certain data and information. We have also experienced fraudulent activity
initiated through social engineering attacks by malicious third party actors, which has caused us to incur insignificant financial losses.
Our response to these incidents has been to take immediate steps to investigate and address the unauthorized access or fraudulent
activity, and past unauthorized access and fraudulent activity related to “phishing” or social engineering has not had, and is not
expected to have, a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. We have further developed and enhanced our
cybersecurity systems and processes that are intended to protect this type of data, information, and activity; however, such systems or
processes may not be effective in preventing unauthorized access or activity in the future. While past unauthorized access and activity
has been immaterial to our business and financial results, there can be no assurance that future incidents would also be immaterial.
Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems or data, or deceive our employees
to allow fraudulent access or activity, change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be
unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may also experience security breaches that
may remain undetected for an extended period.
We are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of various types
of personal information. In some cases, these laws apply not only to third-party interactions, but may also restrict transfers of personal
information among Redwood and its subsidiaries. Several jurisdictions have passed laws and corresponding regulators have
promulgated rules and regulations in this area, and additional jurisdictions are considering imposing additional restrictions or have
laws that are pending (including the federal government, which continues to consider enacting additional comprehensive federal
15
privacy laws). These laws continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and
changing requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs and has required and may in the future require us to change our business
practices. Noncompliance could result in significant penalties or legal liability. Furthermore, we make statements about our use and
disclosure of personal information through privacy policies and notices, information provided on our website, and other privacy
notices provided to customers. Any failure by us to comply with these statements or with other federal, state or international privacy or
data protection laws and regulations could result in inquiries or proceedings against us by governmental entities or others, and
potential fines or penalties.
We may be liable for statutory damages and/or losses suffered by individuals whose personal information is compromised or stolen as
a result of a breach of the security of the systems upon which we or third-parties and service providers of ours store this information,
and any such liability could be material. Even if we are not liable for such losses, any breach of these systems could expose us to
material costs in investigating and notifying affected individuals and providing credit monitoring services to them, as well as
regulatory fines or penalties. In addition, any breach of these systems could disrupt our normal business operations and expose us to
reputational damage and lost business, revenues, and profits. Any insurance we maintain against the risk of this type of loss may not
be sufficient to cover actual losses, or may not apply to the circumstances relating to any particular breach.
Security breaches could also significantly damage our reputation with existing and prospective loan sellers, borrowers, and third
parties with whom we do business. Any publicized security problems affecting our businesses and/or those of such third parties may
negatively impact the market perception of our products and discourage market participants from doing business with us. These risks
may increase in the future as we continue to increase our reliance on the internet and use of web-based product offerings and on the
use of cybersecurity.
Furthermore, our business is highly dependent on communications and information systems and many of our internal controls rely on
our financial, accounting and other data processing systems to be effective. Any failure or interruption of either our own systems or
critical third-party systems could negatively impact our ability to transact business and, if prolonged, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
16
Risks Related to our Investments and Investing Activity
The nature of the assets we hold and the investments we make expose us to credit risk that could negatively impact the value of
those assets and investments, our earnings, dividends, cash flows, and access to liquidity, or otherwise negatively affect our
business.
Overview of credit risk
We assume credit risk primarily through the ownership of securities backed by residential, business purpose, and multifamily real
estate loans and through direct investments in residential, business purpose, and multifamily real estate loans. We may also assume
similar credit risks through other types of transactions with counterparties who are seeking to reduce their exposure to credit risk or
who are seeking financing for their own holdings of residential, business purpose, and multifamily real estate loans or servicing rights
relating to residential, business purpose, and multifamily real estate loans. Credit losses on these types of real estate loans can occur
for many reasons, including: fraud; poor underwriting; poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions; increases in payments
required to be made by borrowers; declines in the value of real estate; declining rents and/or elevated delinquencies associated with
single- and multifamily rental housing; the outbreak of highly infectious or contagious diseases; natural disasters, the effects of climate
change (including flooding, drought, wildfires, and severe weather) and other natural events; uninsured property loss; over-leveraging
of the borrower; costs of remediation of environmental conditions, such as indoor mold; changes in zoning or building codes and the
related costs of compliance; acts of war or terrorism; changes in legal protections for lenders and other changes in law or regulation;
and personal events affecting borrowers, such as reduction in income, job loss, divorce, or health problems. In addition, the amount
and timing of credit losses could be affected by loan modifications, delays in the liquidation process, documentation errors, and other
action by servicers. Weakness in the U.S. economy or the housing market could cause our credit losses to increase beyond levels that
we currently anticipate.
In addition, rising interest rates may increase the credit risks associated with certain residential real estate loans. For example, the
interest rate is adjustable for some of the loans held at securitization entities we have sponsored and for a portion of the loans
underlying residential securities we have acquired from securitizations sponsored by others. In addition, a portion of the loans we have
pledged to secure short-term warehouse borrowings and a portion of the business purpose and multifamily real estate loans and loans
underlying multifamily securities we have acquired may have adjustable interest rates. Accordingly, when short-term interest rates
rise, required monthly payments from borrowers will rise under the terms of these adjustable-rate mortgages, and this may increase
borrowers’ delinquencies and defaults.
Credit losses on business purpose and multifamily real estate loans and real estate loans collateralizing business purpose and
multifamily securities can occur for many of the reasons noted above for residential real estate loans. Moreover, these types of real
estate loans may not be fully amortizing and, therefore, the borrower’s ability to repay the principal when due may depend upon the
ability of the borrower to refinance or sell the property at maturity. Business purpose and multifamily real estate loans and real estate
loans collateralizing business purpose and multifamily securities are particularly sensitive to conditions in the rental housing market
and to demand for residential rental properties.
We may have heightened credit losses associated with certain securities and investments we own.
Within a securitization of residential, multifamily, or business purpose real estate loans, various securities are created, each of which
has varying degrees of credit risk. We may own the securities in which there is more (or the most) concentrated credit risk associated
with the underlying real estate loans.
In general, losses on an asset securing a residential, multifamily, or business purpose real estate loan included in a securitization will
be borne first by the owner of the property (i.e., the owner will first lose any equity invested in the property) and, thereafter, by the
first-loss security holder, and then by holders of more senior securities. In the event the losses incurred upon default on the loan
exceed any classes of securities junior to those in which we invest (if any), we may not be able to recover all of our investment in the
securities we hold. In addition, if the underlying properties have been overvalued by the originating appraiser or if the values
subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral is available to satisfy interest and principal payments due on the related security,
then the first-loss securities may suffer a total loss of principal, followed by losses on the second-loss and then third-loss securities (or
other residential, business purpose, and multifamily securities that we own). In addition, with respect to residential securities we own,
we may be subject to risks associated with the determination by a loan servicer to discontinue servicing advances (advances of
mortgage interest payments not made by a delinquent borrower) if they deem continued advances to be unrecoverable, which could
reduce the value of these securities or impair our ability to project and realize future cash flows from these securities.
17
For loans or other investments we own directly (not through a securitization structure), we will most likely be in a position to incur
credit losses - should they occur - only after losses are borne by the owner of the property (e.g., by a reduction in the owner’s equity
stake in the property). Similar to our exposure to credit losses on loans we own directly, we have committed to assume credit losses -
but only up to a specified amount - on certain conforming residential mortgage loans that we acquired and then sold to Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac pursuant to risk-sharing arrangements we entered into with those entities, to the extent any such losses exceed the
owner’s equity investment in the property. We may take actions available to us in an attempt to protect our position and mitigate the
amount of credit losses, but these actions may not prove to be successful and could result in our increasing the amount of credit losses
we ultimately incur on a loan.
Additionally, loans to small, privately owned businesses such as borrowers from our business purpose loan origination platforms
involve a high degree of business and financial risk. Often, there is little or no publicly available information about these businesses.
Accordingly, we must rely on our own due diligence to obtain information in connection with our investment decisions. A borrower’s
ability to repay its loan may be adversely impacted by numerous factors, including a downturn in its industry or other negative local or
more general economic conditions. Deterioration in a borrower’s financial condition and prospects may be accompanied by
deterioration in the collateral for the loan. These factors may have an impact on loans involving such businesses, and can result in
substantial losses, which in turn could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The nature of the assets underlying some of the securities and investments we hold could increase the credit risk of those securities.
For certain types of loans underlying securities we may own or acquire, the loan rate or borrower payment rate may increase over
time, increasing the potential for default. For example, securities may be backed by residential real estate loans that have negative
amortization features. The rate at which interest accrues on these loans may change more frequently or to a greater extent than
payment adjustments on an adjustable-rate loan, and adjustments of monthly payments may be subject to limitations or may be limited
by the borrower’s option to pay less than the full accrual rate. As a result, the amount of interest accruing on the remaining principal
balance of the loans at the applicable adjustable mortgage loan rate may exceed the amount of the monthly payment. To the extent we
are exposed to it, this is particularly a risk in a rising interest rate environment. Negative amortization occurs when the resulting excess
(of interest owed over interest paid) is added to the unpaid principal balance of the related adjustable mortgage loan. For certain loans
that have a negative amortization feature, the required monthly payment is increased after a specified number of months or after a
maximum amount of negative amortization has occurred in order to amortize fully the loan by the end of its original term. Other
negative amortizing loans limit the amount by which the monthly payment can be increased, which results in a larger final payment at
maturity. As a result, negatively amortizing loans have performance characteristics similar to those of balloon loans. Negative
amortization may result in increases in delinquencies, loan loss severity, and loan defaults, which may, in turn, result in payment
delays and credit losses on our investments. Other types of loans and investments to which we are exposed, such as hybrid loans and
adjustable-rate loans, may also have greater credit risk than more traditional amortizing fixed-rate mortgage loans.
Many of the real estate loans collateralizing business purpose and multifamily securities and business purpose and multifamily real
estate loans we own or may acquire are only partially amortizing or do not provide for any principal amortization prior to a balloon
principal payment at maturity. Real estate loans that only partially amortize or that have a balloon principal payment at maturity may
have a higher risk of default at maturity than fully amortizing loans. In addition, since most of the principal of these loans is repaid at
maturity, the amount of loss upon default is generally greater than on other loans that provide for more principal amortization.
We have concentrated credit risk in certain geographical regions and may be disproportionately affected by an economic or housing
downturn, natural disaster, terrorist event, climate change, or any other adverse event specific to those regions.
A decline in the economy or difficulties in certain real estate markets, such as a high level of foreclosures in a particular area, are
likely to cause a decline in the value of residential and multifamily properties in that market. This, in turn, will increase the risk of
delinquency, default, and foreclosure on real estate underlying securities and loans we hold with properties in those regions, and it will
increase the risk of loss on other investments we own. This may then adversely affect our credit loss experience and other aspects of
our business, including our ability to securitize (or otherwise sell) real estate loans and securities.
The occurrence of a natural disaster (such as an earthquake, tornado, hurricane, flood, landslide, or wildfire), or the effects of climate
change (including flooding, drought, and severe weather), may cause decreases in the value of real estate (including sudden or abrupt
changes) and would likely reduce the value of the properties collateralizing real estate loans we own or those underlying the securities
or other investments we own. For example, in recent years, hurricanes have caused widespread flooding in Florida and Texas and
wildfires and mudslides in northern and southern California have destroyed or damaged thousands of homes. Since certain natural
disasters may not typically be covered by the standard hazard insurance policies maintained by borrowers, the borrowers may have to
pay for repairs due to the disasters. Borrowers may not repair their property or may stop paying their mortgage loans under those
circumstances, especially if the property is damaged. This would likely cause foreclosures to increase and lead to higher credit losses
on our loans or investments or on the pool of mortgage loans underlying securities we own.
18
A significant number of residential real estate loans that we own, or that underlie the securities we own, are secured by properties in
California and, thus, we have a higher concentration of credit risk within California than in other states. Additional states where we
have concentrations of residential loan credit risk are set forth in Note 6 to the Financial Statements within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Balances on real estate loans collateralizing multifamily securities and business purpose real estate loans we own and may
originate or acquire are larger than residential loans and in the past we have had, and may have in the future, a geographically
concentrated portfolio of such loans and securities. Real estate loans collateralizing consolidated multifamily securities and business
purpose real estate loans we currently own are generally concentrated in California, Florida, Texas, New Jersey, and Connecticut.
The timing of credit losses can harm our economic returns.
The timing of credit losses can be a material factor in our economic returns from real estate loans, investments, and securities. If
unanticipated losses occur within the first few years after a loan is originated, an investment is made, or a securitization is completed,
those losses could have a greater negative impact on our investment returns than unanticipated losses on more seasoned loans,
investments, or securities. In addition, higher levels of delinquencies and cumulative credit losses within a securitized loan pool can
delay our receipt of principal and interest that is due to us under the terms of the securities backed by that pool. This would also lower
our economic returns. The timing of credit losses could be affected by the creditworthiness of the borrower, the borrower’s willingness
and ability to continue to make payments, and new legislation, legal actions, or programs that allow for the modification of loans or
rental obligations, or ability for borrowers or tenants to get relief through forbearance, bankruptcy or other avenues.
Our efforts to manage credit risks may fail.
We attempt to manage risks of credit losses by continually evaluating our investments for impairment indicators and establishing
reserves under GAAP for credit and other risks based upon our assessment of these risks. We cannot establish credit reserves for tax
accounting purposes. The amount of reserves that we establish may prove to be insufficient, which would negatively impact our
financial results and would result in decreased earnings. In addition, cash and other capital we hold to help us manage credit and other
risks and liquidity issues may prove to be insufficient. If these increased credit losses are greater than we anticipated and we need to
increase our credit reserves, our GAAP earnings might be reduced. Increased credit losses may also adversely affect our cash flows,
ability to invest, dividend distribution requirements and payments, asset fair values, access to short-term borrowings, and ability to
securitize or finance assets.
Despite our efforts to manage credit risk, there are many aspects of credit risk that we cannot control. Our quality control and loss
mitigation policies and procedures may not be successful in limiting future delinquencies, defaults, and losses, or they may not be cost
effective. Our underwriting reviews may not be effective. The securitizations in which we have invested may not receive funds that we
believe are due from mortgage insurance companies and other counterparties. Loan servicing companies may not cooperate with our
loss mitigation efforts or those efforts may be ineffective. Service providers to securitizations, such as trustees, loan servicers, bond
insurance providers, and custodians, may not perform in a manner that promotes our interests. Delay of foreclosures could delay
resolution and increase ultimate loss severities, as a result.
The value of the homes or properties collateralizing or underlying real estate loans or investments may decline, and rents on single and
multifamily rental properties may decline. The frequency of default and the loss severity on loans upon default may be greater than we
anticipate. Interest-only loans, negative amortization loans, adjustable-rate loans, larger balance loans, reduced documentation loans,
subprime loans, Alt-A quality loans, second lien loans, loans in certain locations, residential mortgage loans that are not “qualified
mortgages” under regulations promulgated by the CFPB, re-performing and non-performing loans, and loans or investments that are
partially collateralized by non-real estate assets may have increased risks and severity of loss. If property securing or underlying loans
becomes real estate owned as a result of foreclosure, we bear the risk of not being able to sell the property and recovering our
investment and of being exposed to the risks attendant to the ownership of real property.
Changes in consumer behavior, bankruptcy laws, tax laws, regulation of the mortgage industry, and other laws may exacerbate loan or
investment losses. Changes in rules that would cause loans owned by a securitization entity to be modified may not be beneficial to
our interests if the modifications reduce the interest we earn and increase the eventual severity of a loss. In some states and
circumstances, the securitizations in which we invest have recourse as owner of the loan against the borrower’s other assets and
income in the event of loan default. However, in most cases, the value of the underlying property will be the sole effective source of
funds for any recoveries. Other changes or actions by judges or legislators regarding mortgage loans and contracts, including the
voiding of certain portions of these agreements, may reduce our earnings, impair our ability to mitigate losses, or increase the
probability and severity of losses. Any expansion of our loss mitigation efforts could increase our operating costs and the expanded
loss mitigation efforts may not reduce our future credit losses.
19
Credit ratings assigned to debt securities by the credit rating agencies may not accurately reflect the risks associated with those
securities. Furthermore, downgrades in credit ratings could increase our credit risk, reduce our cash flows, or otherwise adversely
affect our business and operations.
We generally do not consider credit ratings in assessing our estimates of future cash flows and desirability of our investments
(although our assessment of the quality of an investment may prove to be inaccurate and we may incur credit losses in excess of our
initial expectations). The assignment of an “investment grade” rating to a security by a rating agency does not mean that there is not
credit risk associated with the security or that the risk of a credit loss with respect to such security is necessarily remote. Many of the
securities we own do have credit ratings and, to the extent we securitize loans and securities, we expect to retain credit rating agencies
to provide ratings on the securities created by these securitization entities (as we have in the past).
Rating agencies rate debt securities based upon their assessment of the safety of the receipt of principal and interest payments. Rating
agencies do not consider the risks of fluctuations in fair value or other factors that may influence the value of debt securities and,
therefore, any assigned credit rating may not fully reflect the true risks of an investment in securities. Also, rating agencies may fail to
make timely adjustments to credit ratings based on available data or changes in economic outlook or may otherwise fail to make
changes in credit ratings in response to subsequent events, so that our investments may be better or worse than the ratings indicate.
Credit rating agencies may change their methods of evaluating credit risk and determining ratings on securities backed by real estate
loans and securities. These changes may occur quickly and often. The market’s ability to understand and absorb these changes and the
impact to the securitization market in general are difficult to predict. Such changes may have an impact on the amount of investment-
grade and non-investment-grade securities that are created or placed on the market in the future. Downgrades to the ratings of
securities could have an adverse effect on the value of some of our investments and our cash flows from those investments.
Residential mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic may not make payments of principal and
interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all, which could negatively impact our business.
Residential mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic may not remit payments of principal and
interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all. This could be due to an inability to make such payments, an
unwillingness to make such payments, or a temporary or permanent waiver of the requirement to make such payments, including
under the terms of any applicable forbearance, modification, or maturity extension agreement or program. Such forbearance, waiver,
or maturity extension may be available as a result of a government-sponsored or ‑imposed program or under any such agreement or
program we or our sub-servicers may otherwise offer to mortgage borrowers. To the extent mortgage loan borrowers do not make
payments on their loans, the value of residential mortgage loans and residential mortgage-backed securities we own will likely be
impaired, potentially materially. Additionally, to the extent the pandemic impacts local, regional or national economic conditions, the
value of residential real estate may decline, which would also likely negatively impact the value of mortgage loans and mortgage-
backed securities we own, potentially materially.
We are exposed to the negative financial impact of pandemic-related and other payment forbearances with respect loans securitized in
Sequoia transactions, loans held for investment or sale, and a variety of other investments, including third-party issued mortgage-
backed securities, mortgage servicing rights and related cash flows, re-performing residential mortgage loans, and business purpose
loans. In addition, transactions we have entered into, including to finance loans with warehouse financing providers and to sell whole
loans to third parties, may be negatively impacted by pandemic-related and other payment forbearances, including by reducing our
proceeds from these transactions or if we are required to repurchase impacted loans.
With respect to MSRs we own that are associated with mortgage loans that become delinquent (including MSRs retained for jumbo
mortgage loans that we securitize through our Sequoia securitization platform and investments we have made in excess MSRs and
servicing advances), cash flows we would otherwise expect to receive from our retained investments in Sequoia securitization
transactions or other investments may be redirected to other investors in mortgage backed securities issued in those securitization
transactions (or may be otherwise not remitted to us) or we may be obligated to fund loan servicers' principal and interest advances, as
well as advances of property taxes, insurance and other amounts. Additionally, through our investment in servicer advances and
associated excess MSRs, we may fund an increased amount of servicer advances on loans underlying the associated transactions.
Further, any federal assistance programs available to mortgage loan servicers may not be available to us because our business and
investments are not focused on mortgage loans that are eligible to be purchased or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or
governmental agencies such as the Federal Housing Administration or Department of Veteran Affairs. To the extent our otherwise
expected cash flows are so impaired or to the extent we are required to fund loan servicers' advances it may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
20
Multifamily and business purpose mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic may not make
payments of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all, which could negatively impact our
business.
Multifamily and business purpose loans and securities backed by multifamily and business purpose mortgage loans we own are
subject to similar risks as those described above with respect to residential mortgage loans, and will likely be impaired, potentially
materially to the extent multifamily and business purpose loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic do not
timely remit payments of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans. In addition, if tenants who rent their residence from a
multifamily or business purpose loan borrower are unable to make rental payments, are unwilling to make rental payments, or a waiver
of the requirement to make rental payments on a timely basis, or at all, is available under the terms of any applicable forbearance or
waiver agreement or program (which rental payment forbearance or waiver program may be available as a result of a government-
sponsored or -imposed program or under any such agreement or program a landlord may otherwise offer to tenants), then the value of
multifamily and business purpose loans and multifamily and business purpose mortgage backed securities we own will likely be
impaired, potentially materially. Moreover, to the extent the economic impact of any such pandemic impacts local, regional or national
economic conditions, the value of multifamily and residential real estate that secures multifamily and business purpose loans is likely
to decline, which would also likely negatively impact the value of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities we own, potentially
materially.
Additionally, a significant amount of the business purpose loans that we own are short-term bridge loans that are secured by
residential properties that are undergoing rehabilitation or construction and not occupied by tenants. Because these properties are
generally not income producing (e.g., from rental revenue), in order to fund principal and interest payments, these borrowers may seek
to renegotiate the terms of their mortgage loan, including by seeking payment forbearances, waivers, or maturity extensions as a result
of being negatively impacted by the pandemic. Moreover, planned construction or rehabilitation of these properties may not be able to
proceed on a timely basis or at all due to operating disruptions or government mandated moratoriums on construction, development or
redevelopment. All of the foregoing factors would also likely negatively impact the value of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities we own, potentially materially.
Changes in prepayment rates of mortgage loans could reduce our earnings, dividends, cash flows, and access to liquidity.
The economic returns we earn from most of the real estate securities and loans we own (directly or indirectly) are affected by the rate
of prepayment of the underlying mortgage loans. Prepayments are difficult to accurately predict and adverse changes in the rate of
prepayment could reduce our cash flows, earnings, and dividends. Adverse changes in cash flows would likely reduce the fair values
of many of our assets, which could reduce our ability to borrow against our assets and may cause market valuation adjustments for
GAAP purposes, which could reduce our reported earnings. While we estimate prepayment rates to determine the effective yield of
our assets and valuations, these estimates are not precise and prepayment rates do not necessarily change in a predictable manner as a
function of interest rate changes. Prepayment rates can change rapidly. As a result, changes can cause volatility in our financial results,
affect our ability to securitize assets, affect our ability to fund acquisitions, and have other negative impacts on our ability to generate
earnings.
We may own securities backed by residential loans that are particularly sensitive to changes in prepayments rates. These securities
include interest-only securities (IOs) that we acquire from third parties and from our Sequoia entities. Faster prepayments than we
anticipated on the underlying loans backing these IOs will have an adverse effect on our returns on these investments and may result in
losses. Similarly, we own mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs, associated with residential mortgage loans, and excess MSR
investments associated with residential and multifamily mortgage loans, all of which are particularly sensitive to changes in
prepayments rates. As the owner of an MSR (or excess MSR investment), we are entitled to a portion of the interest payments made
by the borrower in respect of the associated loan and, in the case of MSRs, we are responsible for hiring and compensating a sub-
servicer to directly service the associated loan. Faster prepayments than we anticipate on loans associated with MSRs and excess MSR
investments we own will have an adverse effect on our returns from these MSRs and may result in losses.
Some of the business purpose loans we originate or hold may allow the borrower to make prepayments without incurring a
prepayment penalty and some may include provisions allowing the borrower to extend the term of the loan beyond the originally
scheduled maturity. Because the decision to prepay or extend a business purpose loan is controlled by the borrower, we may not
accurately anticipate the timing of these events, which could affect the earnings and cash flows we anticipate and could impact our
ability to finance these assets.
21
Interest rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us and could lead to reduced earnings and increased volatility in our
earnings.
Changes in interest rates, the interrelationships between various interest rates, and interest rate volatility could have negative effects on
our earnings, the fair value of our assets and liabilities, loan prepayment rates, and our access to liquidity. Changes in interest rates can
also harm the credit performance of our assets. We generally seek to hedge some but not all interest rate risks. Our hedging may not
work effectively and we may change our hedging strategies or the degree or type of interest rate risk we assume.
Some of the loans and securities we own or may acquire have adjustable-rate coupons (i.e., they may earn interest at a rate that adjusts
periodically based on an interest rate index). The cash flows we receive from these assets may vary as a function of interest rates, as
may the reported earnings generated by these assets. We also acquire loans and securities for future sale, as assets we are accumulating
for securitization, or as a longer-term investment. We expect to fund assets with a combination of equity, fixed rate debt and adjustable
rate debt. To the extent we use adjustable rate debt to fund assets that have a fixed interest rate (or use fixed rate debt to fund assets
that have an adjustable interest rate), an interest rate mismatch could exist and we could, for example, earn less (and fair values could
decline) if interest rates rise, at least for a time. We may or may not seek to mitigate interest rate mismatches for these assets with
hedges such as interest rate agreements and other derivatives and, to the extent we do use hedging techniques, they may not be
successful.
Higher interest rates generally reduce the fair value of many of our assets, with the exception of our IOs, MSRs, excess MSR
investments, and adjustable-rate assets. This may affect our earnings results, reduce our ability to securitize, re-securitize, or sell our
assets, or reduce our liquidity. Higher interest rates could reduce the ability of borrowers to make interest payments or to refinance
their loans. Higher interest rates could reduce property values and increased credit losses could result. Higher interest rates could
reduce mortgage originations, thus reducing our opportunities to acquire new assets.
When short-term interest rates are high relative to long-term interest rates, an increase in adjustable-rate residential loan prepayments
may occur, which would likely reduce our returns from owning interest-only securities backed by adjustable-rate residential loans.
It can be difficult to predict the impact on interest rates of unexpected and uncertain global political and economic events, such as the
outbreak of pandemic or epidemic disease, warfare (including the recent outbreak of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine),
economic and international trade conflicts or sanctions, the change in the U.S. presidential administration and political makeup of the
Congress, or changes in the credit rating of the U.S. government, the United Kingdom, or one or more Eurozone nations; however,
increased uncertainty or changes in the economic outlook for, or rating of, the creditworthiness of the U.S. government, the United
Kingdom, or Eurozone nations may have adverse impacts on, among other things, the U.S. economy, financial markets, the cost of
borrowing, the financial strength of counterparties we transact business with, and the value of assets we hold. Any such adverse
impacts could negatively impact the availability to us of short-term debt financing, our cost of short-term debt financing, our business,
and our financial results.
We have significant investment and reinvestment risks.
New assets we acquire or originate may not generate yields as attractive as yields on our current assets, which could result in a
decline in our earnings per share over time.
Assets we acquire, originate, or invest in may not generate the economic returns and GAAP yields we expect. Realized cash flow
could be significantly lower than expected and returns from new investments, originations, and acquisitions could be negative. In
order to maintain our portfolio size and our earnings, we must reinvest in new assets a portion of the cash flows we receive from
principal, interest, and sales. We receive monthly payments from many of our assets, consisting of principal and interest. In addition,
occasionally some of our mortgage-backed securities are called (effectively sold). We may also sell assets from time to time as part of
our portfolio and capital management strategies. For example, during 2020, the composition of our investment portfolio changed
significantly as a result of asset sales undertaken in response to the financing market disruptions resulting from the pandemic.
Principal payments, calls, and sales reduce the size of our current portfolio and generate cash for us.
If the assets we invest in or acquire in the future earn lower GAAP yields than do the assets we currently own, our reported earnings
per share could decline over time as the older assets are paid down, are called, or are sold, assuming comparable expenses, credit
costs, and market valuation adjustments. Under the effective yield method of accounting that we use for GAAP purposes for some of
our assets, we recognize yields on assets based on our assumptions regarding future cash flows. A portion of the cash flows we receive
may be used to reduce our basis in these assets. As a result of these various factors, our basis for GAAP amortization purposes may be
lower than the current fair values of these assets. Assets with a lower GAAP basis than current fair values generate higher GAAP
yields, and such yields are not necessarily available on newly acquired assets. Future economic conditions, including credit results,
22
prepayment patterns, and interest rate trends, are difficult to project with accuracy over the life of the assets we acquire, so there will
be volatility in the reported returns over time.
Our growth may be limited if assets are not available or not available at attractive prices.
To reinvest the proceeds from principal repayments we receive on our existing investments and deploy capital we raise, we may seek
to originate, invest in, or acquire new assets. If the availability of new assets is limited, we may not be able to originate, invest in, or
acquire assets that will generate attractive returns. Generally, asset supply can be reduced if originations of a particular product are
reduced or if there are fewer sales in the secondary market of seasoned product from existing portfolios. In particular, assets we
believe have a favorable risk/reward ratio may not be available for purchase (or origination by our business purpose loan origination
platform).
We do not originate residential loans; rather, we rely on the origination market to supply the types of loans we seek to invest in. At
times, due to increases in interest rates, heightened credit concerns, strengthened underwriting standards, increased regulation, and/or
concerns about economic growth or housing values, the volume of originations may decrease significantly. For example, in 2019 and
2020, residential mortgage interest rates generally declined, and remained at these lower levels throughout 2021, with the result that a
significant portion of industry-wide origination volumes were related to residential borrowers refinancing existing mortgage loans. To
the extent interest rates increase in the future, refinance loan volume is likely to decline, and this volume may not return to previous
levels. A reduced volume of loan originations may make it difficult for us to acquire loans and securities. Similar factors may
contribute to reduced volumes of loan originations by our business purpose loan origination platforms, which would otherwise be
available for transfer to our investment portfolio.
We originate business purpose loans, but we may not be willing to provide the level of loan proceeds to the borrower or interest rate
that borrowers find acceptable or that matches our competitors, which would likely reduce the volume of these types of loans that we
originate.
The supply of new issue residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) collateralized by jumbo mortgage loans available for
purchase could be adversely affected if the economics of executing securitizations are not favorable or if the regulations governing the
execution of securitizations discourage or preclude certain potential market participants from engaging in these transactions. In
addition, if there is not a robust market for triple-A rated securities, the supply of real estate subordinate securities could be
significantly diminished.
We have entered into risk-sharing arrangements with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and have purchased credit risk transfer (CRT)
securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under which we are compensated for agreeing to absorb credit losses on new
conforming loans or for engaging in similar types of credit risk-sharing or -transfer structures. We may continue to make these types
of credit-related investments and may also continue recent initiatives to grow our investment portfolio, including investing in
residential securities collateralized by re-performing and non-performing mortgage loans, multifamily securities, HEIs and securities
collateralized by HEIs, and investments in excess MSRs and servicer advance investments related to pools of residential and small-
balance multifamily mortgage loans. While these initiatives represent potential opportunities for future capital deployment, ultimately
these initiatives may not produce sizable or attractive investment opportunities due to competition from other investors, regulatory
issues, or federal housing finance reform initiatives that impact Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Investments in diverse types of assets and businesses could expose us to new, different, or increased risks.
We have invested in and may in the future invest in a variety of real estate and non-real estate related assets that may not be closely
related to the types of investments we have traditionally made. Additionally, we may enter into or engage in various types of
securitizations, transactions, services, and other operating businesses that are different than the types we have traditionally entered into
or engaged in. For example, in recent years we began expanding our mortgage loan purchase activity to include business purpose loans
secured by non-owner occupied rental properties and bridge loans. Also, in 2019 we completed the acquisitions of two business
purpose real estate loan origination platforms, CoreVest and 5 Arches, which we combined into a single platform through which we
originate business purpose loans, and as a result our holdings of business purpose whole loans have increased as have our issuances
and ownership of securities backed by business purpose loans under the CoreVest CAFLTM securitization label. In recent years we
have also made venture capital investments, investments in subordinate securities backed by re-performing and non-performing
residential loans, multifamily securities, HEIs and securities collateralized by HEIs, excess MSR investments collateralized by
residential and multifamily loans, servicer advance investments related to residential mortgage loans, and a multifamily investment
fund to acquire workforce housing properties.
23
Any of these actions may expose us to new, different, or increased investment, operational, financial, or management risks. Several of
these investments were complex, highly structured, and involve partnerships and joint ventures with co-investors or co-sponsors, any
or all of which may limit the liquidity of such investments. Additionally, when investing in transactions with complex or novel
structures, the risks associated with the transactions and structures may not be fully known to buyers and sellers. For example, we
recently co-sponsored a securitization of HEIs, and continue to purchase and/or hold HEIs either for investment, sale or securitization,
all of which expose us to risk of loss related to home price appreciation (or depreciation). If our assumptions regarding the valuation
and rate of appreciation in value of the property securing an HEI are wrong, our returns will be reduced, and if the value of the
property securing the HEI decreases, we may suffer losses, up to the total loss of our investment. Additionally, HEIs may be subject to
regulatory risk from federal, state, and local regulators or may be recharacterized as debt by courts. For example, if a state mortgage
regulator determines that entering into, or investing in, an HEI is activity covered by that state’s mortgage licensing statute, our
investment may be at risk if we and/or our purchase and sale counterparty, who enters into the HEI with the homeowner, do not
possess the applicable license.
As another example, one of our excess MSR investments includes an associated investment in servicer advances financed with non-
recourse debt. Non-recourse financing generally limits our exposure to losses to the value of the collateral securing the financing (i.e.,
the servicer advances). However, a default on such non-recourse financing of servicer advances could result in a complete loss of our
servicer advance investments and the related excess MSRs. Additionally, this non-recourse financing is short-term. We may not be
able to renew this financing on favorable terms, or at all, which may have a negative impact on the value of our investment. A more
detailed discussion of the risks related to this servicer advance financing is described below in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K under the heading, “Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities.”
As another example, in connection with our acquisitions of CoreVest and 5 Arches, we made assumptions about the cash flows and
investments that will be generated from these acquisitions. Additionally, originating and investing in business purpose mortgage loans
exposes us to new and different risks than our traditional residential mortgage banking activities, including higher rates of
delinquency, default, foreclosure and litigation. If our assumptions are wrong, or if market conditions change, it could have a negative
impact on our financial or operational results related to these acquisitions and to our business as a whole.
We may invest in non-real estate asset-backed securities (ABS), corporate debt, or equity. We have invested in diverse types of IOs
from residential, business purpose, and multifamily securitizations sponsored by us or by others. The higher credit and prepayment
risks associated with these types of investments may increase our exposure to losses. We may invest in non-U.S. assets that may
expose us to currency risks (which we may choose not to hedge) and different types of credit, prepayment, hedging, interest rate,
liquidity, legal, and other risks. In addition, our RWT HorizonsTM venture investing platform invests primarily in early-stage
businesses focused in the real estate, lending, and financial technology markets. These venture investments may come in many forms
and structures including convertible debt or equity, each of which exposes us to a unique set of risks, including the risk of a total loss
of the amount invested. These types of investments could expose us to new, different, or increased risks that we did not anticipate,
which could have a negative impact on the financial returns generated.
In addition, when investing in assets or businesses we are exposed to the risk that those assets, or interest income or revenue generated
by those assets or businesses, result in our not meeting the requirements to maintain our REIT status or our status as exempt from
registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Company Act), as further described in the risk
factors titled “We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and, as such, are required to meet certain tests in order to maintain our REIT
status. This adds complexity and costs to running our business and exposes us to additional risks” and “Conducting our business in a
manner so that we are exempt from registration under, and in compliance with, the Investment Company Act may reduce our
flexibility and could limit our ability to pursue certain opportunities. At the same time, failure to continue to qualify for exemption
from the Investment Company Act could adversely affect us.”
We may change our investment strategy or financing plans, which may result in riskier investments and diminished returns.
We may change our investment strategy or financing plans at any time, which could result in our making investments that are different
from, and possibly riskier than, the investments we have previously made or described. A change in our investment strategy or
financing plans may increase our exposure to interest rate and default risk and real estate market fluctuations. Decisions to employ
additional leverage could increase the risk inherent in our investment strategy. Additionally, a portion of our recent investment activity
has included financing that is either short-term securitization debt or is incurred by entities that we do not control and thus is not
reflected on our balance sheet. Furthermore, a change in our investment strategy could result in our making investments in new asset
categories or in different proportions among asset categories than we previously have. For example, as noted above, since December
2017, we have announced several new initiatives to expand our mortgage banking and investment activities, including by expanding
our mortgage banking activities to include the acquisition and origination of business purpose loans secured by non-owner occupied
rental properties and bridge loans, completing the acquisitions of two business purpose real estate loan origination platforms, CoreVest
and 5 Arches, and optimizing the size and target returns of our investment portfolio. We have also made investments in subordinate
24
securities backed by re-performing and non-performing residential loans, multifamily securities, HEIs and securities collateralized by
HEIs, excess MSR and servicer advance investments collateralized by residential and multifamily loans, a whole loan investment fund
created to acquire light-renovation multifamily loans, a multifamily investment fund to acquire workforce housing properties, and
investments in early-stage businesses focused in the real estate, lending, and financial technology markets. As another example, in the
future, we could determine to invest a greater proportion of our assets in securities backed by non-prime or subprime residential
mortgage loans. These changes could result in our making riskier investments, which could ultimately have an adverse effect on our
financial returns. Alternatively, we could determine to change our investment strategy or financing plans to be more risk averse,
resulting in potentially lower returns, which could also have an adverse effect on our financial returns.
The performance of the assets we own and the investments we make will vary and may not meet our earnings or cash flow
expectations. In addition, the cash flows and earnings from, and market values of, securities, loans, and other assets we own may
be volatile.
We seek to manage certain of the risks associated with acquiring, originating, holding, selling, and managing real estate loans and
securities and other real estate-related investments. No amount of risk management or mitigation, however, can change the variable
nature of the cash flows of, fair values of, and financial results generated by these loans, securities, and other assets. Changes in the
credit performance of, or the prepayments on, these investments, including real estate loans and the loans underlying real estate
securities, and changes in interest rates impact the cash flows on these securities and investments, and the impact could be significant
for our loans, securities, and other assets with concentrated risks. Changes in cash flows lead to changes in our return on investment
and also to potential variability in and level of reported income. The revenue recognized on some of our assets is based on an estimate
of the yield over the remaining life of the asset. Thus, changes in our estimates of expected cash flow from an asset will result in
changes in our reported earnings on that asset in the current reporting period. We may be forced to recognize adverse changes in
expected future cash flows as a current expense, further adding to earnings volatility. Additionally, our non-GAAP measures of
financial performance and our earnings calculated in accordance with GAAP may be subject to volatility. Moreover, the Securities and
Exchange Commission's focus on the use of non-GAAP financial metrics may require us to change the presentation or method of
calculation of our non-GAAP metrics which may result in variability and volatility.
Changes in the fair values of our assets, liabilities, and derivatives can have various negative effects on us, including reduced
earnings, increased earnings volatility, and volatility in our book value.
Fair values for our assets and liabilities, including derivatives, can be volatile and our revenue and income can be impacted by changes
in fair values. The fair values can change rapidly and significantly and changes can result from changes in interest rates, perceived
risk, supply, demand, and actual and projected cash flows, prepayments, and credit performance. A decrease in fair value may not
necessarily be the result of deterioration in future cash flows. Fair values for illiquid assets can be difficult to estimate, which may lead
to volatility and uncertainty of earnings and book value.
For example, real estate-related securities in our investment portfolio may be subject to changes in credit spreads. Credit spreads
measure the yield demanded on securities by the market based on their credit relative to a specific benchmark, and is a measure of the
perceived risk of the investment. Fixed rate securities are valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate
swaps or fixed rate U.S. Treasuries of like maturity. Floating rate securities are typically valued based on a market credit spread over
LIBOR (or another floating rate index such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”)) and are affected similarly by changes
in LIBOR, SOFR, or other index spreads. Excessive supply of these securities or reduced demand may cause the market to require a
higher yield on these securities, resulting in the use of a higher, or “wider,” spread over the benchmark rate to value such securities.
Under such conditions, the value of our securities portfolios would tend to decline. For example, due to the volatility in financial
markets resulting from the pandemic, the market value of our securities portfolio declined significantly, in a compressed time frame
during 2020. Conversely, if the spread used to value such securities were to decrease, or “tighten,” the value of our real estate and
other securities portfolio would tend to increase. Such changes in the market value of our real estate-related securities portfolio may
affect our net equity, net income or cash flow, whether directly, through their impact on unrealized gains or losses on available-for-
sale securities and therefore our ability to realize gains on such securities, or indirectly, through their impact on our ability to borrow
and access capital. Widening credit spreads could cause the net unrealized gains on our securities and derivatives, recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income or retained earnings, and therefore our book value per share, to decrease and result in net
losses.
For GAAP purposes, we mark to market most of the assets and some of the liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. In addition,
valuation adjustments on certain consolidated assets and many of our derivatives are reflected in our consolidated statement of
income. Assets that are funded with certain liabilities and hedges may have differing mark-to-market treatment than the liability or
hedge. If we sell an asset that has not been marked to market through our consolidated statement of income at a reduced market price
relative to its cost basis, our reported earnings will be reduced.
25
Our loan sale profit margins are generally reflective of gains (or losses) over the period from when we identify a loan for purchase
until we subsequently sell or securitize the loan. These profit margins may encompass elements of positive or negative market
valuation adjustments on loans, hedging gains or losses associated with related risk management activities, and any other related
transaction expenses; however, under GAAP, the differing elements may be realized unevenly over the course of one or more quarters
for financial reporting purposes, with the result that our financial results may be more volatile and less reflective of the underlying
economics of our business activity.
Our calculations of the fair value of the securities, loans, MSRs, derivatives, and certain other assets we own or consolidate are based
upon assumptions that are inherently subjective and involve a high degree of management judgment.
We report the fair values of securities, loans, MSRs, derivatives, and certain other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. In
computing the fair values for these assets we may make a number of market-based assumptions, including assumptions regarding
future interest rates, prepayment rates, discount rates, credit loss rates, and the timing of credit losses. These assumptions are
inherently subjective and involve a high degree of management judgment, particularly for illiquid securities and other assets for which
market prices are not readily determinable. For further information regarding our assets recorded at fair value see Note 5 to the
Financial Statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Use of different assumptions could materially affect our fair value
calculations and our financial results. Further discussion of the risk of our ownership and valuation of illiquid securities is set forth
under the heading “Investments we make, hedging transactions that we enter into, and the manner in which we finance our
investments and operations expose us to various risks, including liquidity risk, risks associated with the use of leverage, market risks,
and counterparty risk.”
Changes in banks’ inter-bank lending rate reporting practices, the method pursuant to which LIBOR is determined, or the
discontinuation of LIBOR may adversely affect the value of the financial obligations to be held or issued by us that are linked to
LIBOR.
LIBOR and other indices which are deemed “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory
guidance and proposals for reform. Some of these reforms are already effective while others are still to be implemented. These reforms
and associated changes to behavior may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past, or have other consequences
which cannot be predicted. Many national regulators are recommending U.S. Dollar LIBOR be replaced by the Secured Overnight
Financing Rate (“SOFR”) published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. However, the manner and timing of this shift is
uncertain. U.S. banking regulators issued supervisory guidance encouraging banks to cease entering into new contracts that use U.S.
Dollar LIBOR as a reference rate by December 31, 2021, but certain rates based on U.S. Dollar LIBOR could continue to be published
through June 2023 (but will effectively end earlier if the number of panel banks reporting to LIBOR continues to decrease). Market
participants are still considering how various types of financial instruments and securitization vehicles should transition to a
discontinuation of LIBOR. It is possible that not all of our assets and liabilities will transition away from LIBOR at the same time, and
it is possible that not all of our assets and liabilities will transition to the same alternative reference rate, causing difficult to forecast
consequences. For example, switching existing financial instruments and hedging transactions from LIBOR to SOFR requires
calculations of a spread. Industry organizations are attempting to structure the spread calculation in a manner that minimizes the
possibility of value transfer between counterparties, borrowers, and lenders by virtue of the transition, but there is no assurance that
the calculated spread will be fair and accurate or that all asset types and all types of securitization vehicles will use the same spread.
We and other market participants have less experience understanding and modeling SOFR-based assets and liabilities than LIBOR-
based assets and liabilities, increasing the difficulty of investing, hedging, and risk management. The process of transition involves
operational risks. It is also possible that no transition will occur for many financial instruments. At this time, it is not possible to
predict the effect of any such changes, any establishment of alternative reference rates or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be
implemented. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect
the market for or value of any securities on which the interest or dividend is determined by reference to LIBOR, loans, derivatives and
other financial obligations or on our overall financial condition or results of operations. More generally, any of the above changes or
any other consequential changes to LIBOR or any other “benchmark” or index as a result of international, national or other proposals
for reform or other initiatives, or any further uncertainty in relation to the timing and manner of implementation of such changes,
could have a material adverse effect on the value of and return on any securities based on or linked to a “benchmark” or index.
26
Investments we make, hedging transactions that we enter into, and the manner in which we finance our investments and
operations expose us to various risks, including liquidity risk, risks associated with the use of leverage, market risks, and
counterparty risk.
Many of our investments have limited liquidity.
Many of the residential, business purpose, multifamily, and other securities we own or may own are generally illiquid - that is, there is
not a significant pool of potential investors that are likely to invest in these, or similar, securities. This illiquidity can also exist for the
real estate loans we may hold and the business purpose loans we originate. At times, the vast majority of the assets we own are likely
to be illiquid. In turbulent markets, it is likely that the securities, loans, and other assets we own may become even less liquid. As a
result, we may not be able to sell certain assets at opportune times or at attractive prices or we may incur significant losses upon sale
of these assets, should we want or need to sell them.
Our level of indebtedness and liabilities could limit cash flow available for our operations, expose us to risks that could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and impair our ability to satisfy our obligations under our
convertible notes and other debt instruments.
At December 31, 2021, our total consolidated liabilities (excluding indebtedness associated with asset-backed securities issued and
other liabilities of consolidated entities, for which we are not liable) was $9.62 billion. We may also incur additional indebtedness to
meet future financing needs. Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences for our business, results of operations and
financial condition, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the amount of our cash flow available for other purposes;
requiring asset sales to fund the repayment of maturing debt or to meet margin calls;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business;
dilution experienced by our existing stockholders as a result of the conversion of the convertible notes or exchangeable
securities into shares of common stock; and
placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with less leveraged competitors and competitors that may have better
access to capital resources.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to maintain sufficient cash reserves or continue to generate cash flow from
operations at levels sufficient to permit us to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness, or that our cash needs
will not increase. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make required payments, or
if we fail to comply with the various requirements of our indebtedness then outstanding, we would be in default, which would permit
the holders of the affected indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of such indebtedness and could cause defaults under our other
indebtedness. Any default under any indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. For an additional discussion of our outstanding indebtedness, see Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K under the heading “Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities."
Our use of financial leverage could expose us to increased risks.
We fund the residential and business purpose loans we acquire or originate in anticipation of a future sale or securitization with a
combination of equity and short-term debt. In addition, we also make investments in securities and loans financed with short- and
long-term debt. By incurring this debt (i.e., by applying financial leverage), we expect to generate more attractive returns on our
invested equity capital. However, as a result of using financial leverage (whether for the accumulation of loans or related to longer-
term investments), we could also incur significant losses if our borrowing costs increase relative to the earnings on our assets and costs
of any related hedges. Financing facility creditors may also force us to sell assets pledged as collateral under adverse market
27
conditions to meet margin calls, for example, in the event of a decrease in the fair values of the assets pledged as collateral. Further
discussion of the risk associated with our use of leverage is set forth under the heading “Our use of financial leverage exposes us to
increased risks, including liquidity risks from margin calls and potential breaches of the financial covenants under our borrowing
facilities, which could result in our being required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and
these facilities being unavailable to use for future financing needs, as well as triggering cross-defaults under other debt agreements.”
Liquidation of the collateral could create negative tax consequences and raise REIT qualification issues. Further discussion of the risk
associated with maintaining our REIT status is set forth under the heading “We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and, as such, are
required to meet certain tests in order to maintain our REIT status. This adds complexity and costs to running our business and
exposes us to additional risks.” In addition, we make financial covenants to creditors in connection with incurring short- and long-
term debt, such as covenants relating to our maintaining a minimum amount of tangible net worth or stockholders’ equity and/or a
minimum amount of liquid assets, and a maximum ratio of recourse debt to stockholders’ equity. If we fail to comply with these
financial covenants we would be in default under our financing facilities, which could result in, among other things, the liquidation of
collateral we have pledged pursuant to these facilities under adverse market conditions and the inability to incur additional borrowings
to finance our business activities. A further discussion of financial covenants we are subject to and related risks associated with our
use of short-term debt is set forth under the heading “Our use of financial leverage exposes us to increased risks, including liquidity
risks from margin calls and potential breaches of the financial covenants under our borrowing facilities, which could result in our
being required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to
use for future financing needs, as well as triggering cross-defaults under other debt agreements.” and in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K under the heading, “Risks Relating to Debt Incurred Under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities.”
Additionally, our ability to increase our borrowing limits under our debt financing facilities (and therefore increase our investment
capacity) may be limited by our ability to raise equity capital, which we may not be able to raise at attractive prices or at all.
The inability to access financial leverage through warehouse and repurchase facilities, credit facilities, or other forms of debt
financing may inhibit our ability to execute our business plan, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results,
financial condition, and business.
Our ability to fund our business and our investment strategy depends on our securing warehouse, repurchase, or other forms of debt
financing (or leverage) on acceptable terms. For example, pending the sale or securitization of a pool of mortgage loans or other assets
we generally fund those mortgage loans or other assets through borrowings from warehouse, repurchase, and credit facilities, and
other forms of short-term financing.
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in establishing sufficient sources of short-term debt when needed. In addition,
because of its short-term nature, lenders may decline to renew our short-term debt upon maturity or expiration, and it may be difficult
for us to obtain continued short-term financing. During certain periods, such as during 2020 when there were, at times, severe market
dislocations resulting from the pandemic, lenders may curtail their willingness to provide financing, as liquidity in short-term debt
markets, including repurchase facilities and commercial paper markets, can be withdrawn suddenly, making it difficult or expensive to
renew short-term borrowings as they mature. To the extent our business or investment strategy calls for us to access financing and
counterparties are unable or unwilling to lend to us, then our business and financial results will be adversely affected. It is also
possible that lenders who provide us with financing could experience changes in their ability to advance funds to us, independent of
our performance or the performance of our investments, in which case funds we had planned to be able to access may not be available
to us. Additionally, our ability to increase borrowing limits under our debt financing facilities (and therefore increase our investment
capacity) may be limited by our ability to raise equity capital, which we may not be able to raise at attractive prices or at all.
Hedging activities may reduce earnings, may fail to reduce earnings volatility, and may fail to protect our capital in difficult economic
environments.
We attempt to hedge certain interest rate risks (and, at times, prepayment risks and fair values) by balancing the characteristics of our
assets and associated (existing and anticipated) liabilities with respect to those risks and entering into various interest rate agreements.
The number and scope of the interest rate agreements we utilize may vary significantly over time. We generally seek to enter into
interest rate agreements that provide an appropriate and efficient method for hedging certain risks related to changes in interest rates.
The use of interest rate agreements and other instruments to hedge certain of our risks may have the effect over time of lowering long-
term earnings to the extent these risks do not materialize. To the extent that we hedge, it is usually to seek to protect us from some of
the effects of short-term interest rate volatility, to lower short-term earnings volatility, to stabilize liability costs or fair values, to
stabilize our economic returns from a securitization transaction, or to stabilize the future cost of anticipated issuance of securities by a
securitization entity. Hedging may not achieve our desired goals. For example, in response to market dislocations during 2020
resulting from the pandemic, we made the determination that our interest rate hedges were no longer effective in hedging asset market
values and we terminated or closed out substantially all of our outstanding interest rate hedges and, overall, incurred realized losses.
Although we have re-established our interest rate risk hedging program, there can be no assurance that future market conditions and
28
our financial condition in the future will enable us to maintain an effective interest rate risk hedging program. Even in times of
ordinary market and economic conditions, hedging with respect to the pipeline of loans we plan to purchase may not be effective due
to loan fallout or other reasons. Using interest rate agreements as a hedge may increase short-term earnings volatility, especially if we
do not elect certain accounting treatments for our hedges or hedged items. Reductions in fair values of interest rate agreements may
not be offset by increases in fair values of the assets or liabilities being hedged. Conversely, increases in fair values of interest rate
agreements may not fully offset declines in fair values of assets or liabilities being hedged. Changes in fair values of interest rate
agreements may require us to pledge significant amounts of cash or other acceptable forms of collateral.
We also may hedge by taking short, forward, or long positions in U.S. Treasuries, mortgage securities, or other financial instruments.
We may take both long and short positions in credit derivative transactions linked to real estate assets. These derivatives may have
additional risks to us, such as: liquidity risk, due to the fact that there may not be a ready market into which we could sell these
derivatives if needed; basis risk, which could result in a decline in value or a requirement to make a cash payment as a result of
changes in interest rates; and the risk that a counterparty to a derivative is not willing or able to perform its obligations to us due to its
financial condition or otherwise.
Our earnings may be subject to fluctuations from quarter to quarter as a result of the accounting treatment for certain derivatives or for
assets or liabilities whose terms do not necessarily match those used for derivatives, or as a result of our inability to meet the
requirements necessary to obtain specific hedge accounting treatment for certain derivatives.
Additionally, the interest rate agreements and other instruments that we may use to hedge certain risks are also subject to risks related
to the transition away from the use of LIBOR as a floating rate index, as further described above under the risk factor titled “The
performance of the assets we own and the investments we make will vary and may not meet our earnings or cash flow expectations. In
addition, the cash flows and earnings from, and market values of, securities, loans, and other assets we own may be volatile - Changes
in banks’ inter-bank lending rate reporting practices, the method pursuant to which LIBOR is determined, or the discontinuation of
LIBOR may adversely affect the value of the financial obligations to be held or issued by us that are linked to LIBOR.”
We enter into derivative contracts that may expose us to contingent liabilities and those contingent liabilities may not appear on our
balance sheet. We may invest in synthetic securities, credit default swaps, and other credit derivatives, which expose us to additional
risks.
We enter into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, options, and futures, that could require us to make cash payments in
certain circumstances. Such potential payment obligations would be contingent liabilities and may not appear on our balance sheet.
Our ability to satisfy these contingent liabilities depends on the liquidity of our assets and our access to capital and cash. The need to
fund these contingent liabilities could adversely impact our financial condition.
We may in the future invest in synthetic securities, credit default swaps, and other credit derivatives that reference other real estate
securities or indices. These investments may present risks in excess of those resulting from the referenced security or index. These
investments are typically contractual relationships with counterparties and not acquisitions of referenced securities or other assets. In
these types of investments, we have no right directly to enforce compliance with the terms of the referenced security or other assets
and we have no voting or other consensual rights of ownership with respect to the referenced security or other assets. In the event of
insolvency of a counterparty, we will be treated as a general creditor of the counterparty and will have no claim of title with respect to
the referenced security.
Hedging activities may subject us to increased regulation.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, there is increased regulation of companies, such as Redwood and certain of our subsidiaries, that enter into
interest rate hedging agreements and other hedging instruments and derivatives. This increased regulation could result in Redwood or
certain of our subsidiaries being required to register and be regulated as a commodity pool operator or a commodity trading advisor. If
we are not able to maintain an exemption from these regulations, it could have a negative impact on our business or financial results.
Moreover, rules requiring central clearing of certain interest rate swap and other transactions, as well as rules relating to margin and
capital requirements for swap transactions and regulated participants in the swap markets, as well as other swap market regulatory
reforms, may increase the cost or decrease the availability to us of hedging transactions, and may also limit our ability to include
swaps in our securitization transactions.
29
Our results could be adversely affected by counterparty credit risk.
We have credit risks that are generally related to the counterparties with which we do business. There is a risk that counterparties will
fail to perform under their contractual arrangements with us and this risk is usually more pronounced during an economic downturn.
The economic impact of the pandemic and the associated volatility in the financial markets has at times triggered, and is likely to
trigger additional periods of economic slowdown or recession, and such conditions could jeopardize the solvency of counterparties
with which we do business. Counterparties may seek to eliminate credit exposure by entering into offsetting, or “back-to-back,”
hedging transactions, and the ability of a counterparty to settle a synthetic transaction may be dependent on whether the counterparties
to the back-to-back transactions perform their delivery obligations. Those risks of non-performance may differ materially from the
risks entailed in exchange-traded transactions, which generally are backed by clearing organization guarantees, daily mark-to-market
and settlement of positions, and segregation and minimum capital requirements applicable to intermediaries. Transactions entered into
directly between parties generally do not benefit from those protections, and expose the parties to the risk of counterparty default.
Furthermore, there may be practical and timing problems associated with enforcing our rights to assets in the case of an insolvency of
a counterparty.
In the event a counterparty to our borrowings becomes insolvent, we may fail to recover the full value of our pledged collateral, thus
reducing our earnings and liquidity. In addition, the insolvency of one or more of our financing counterparties could reduce the
amount of financing available to us, which would make it more difficult for us to leverage the value of our assets and obtain substitute
financing on attractive terms or at all. A material reduction in our financing sources or an adverse change in the terms of our
financings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In the event a counterparty to our
interest rate agreements or other derivatives becomes insolvent or interprets our agreements with it in a manner unfavorable to us, our
ability to realize benefits from the hedge transaction may be diminished, any cash or collateral we pledged to the counterparty may be
unrecoverable, and we may be forced to unwind these agreements at a loss. In the event a counterparty that sells us residential
mortgage loans becomes insolvent or is acquired by a third party, we may be unable to enforce our loan repurchase rights in
connection with a breach of loan representations and warranties and we may suffer losses if we must repurchase delinquent loans. In
the event that one of our sub-servicers becomes insolvent or fails to perform, loan delinquencies and credit losses may increase and we
may not receive the funds to which we are entitled. We attempt to diversify our counterparty exposure and (except with respect to
loan-level representations and warranties) attempt to limit our counterparty exposure to counterparties with investment-grade credit
ratings, although we may not always be able to do so. Our counterparty risk management strategy may prove ineffective and,
accordingly, our earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected.
30
Operational and Other Risks
Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and plan to continue to engage, in acquiring
residential mortgage loans and originating business-purpose mortgage loans with the intent to sell these loans to third parties or
hold them as investments. Similarly, we have engaged in the past, and may continue to engage, in acquiring residential MSRs.
These types of transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks.
Acquiring and originating mortgage loans with intent to sell these loans to third parties generally requires us to incur short-term debt,
either on a recourse or non-recourse basis, to finance the accumulation of loans or other assets prior to sale. This type of debt may not
be available to us, or may only be available to us on an uncommitted basis, including in circumstances where a line of credit had
previously been made available or committed to us. In addition, the terms of any available debt may be unfavorable to us or impose
restrictive covenants that could limit our business and operations or the violation of which could lead to losses and inhibit our ability
to borrow in the future. We expect to pledge assets we acquire to secure the short-term debt we incur. To the extent this debt is
recourse to us, if the value of the assets pledged as, or underlying our, collateral declines, we may be required to increase the amount
of collateral pledged to secure the debt or to repay all or a portion of the debt. In addition, when we originate or acquire assets for a
sale, we make assumptions about the cash flows that will be generated from those assets and the market value of those assets. If these
assumptions are wrong, or if market values change or other conditions change, it could result in a sale that is less favorable to us than
initially assumed, which would typically have a negative impact on our financial results.
Furthermore, if we are unable to complete the sale of these types of assets, it could have a negative impact on our business and
financial results. We have a limited capacity to hold residential and business purpose loans on our balance sheet as investments, and
our business is not structured to buy-and-hold the full volume of loans that we routinely acquire or originate with the intent to sell. If
demand for buying whole-loans weakens, we may be forced to incur additional debt on unfavorable terms or may be unable to borrow
to finance these assets, which may in turn impact our ability to continue acquiring or originating loans over the short or long term.
Additionally, mortgage loan borrowers that have been or continue to be negatively impacted by the pandemic may not remit payments
of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all. To the extent mortgage loan borrowers do not
make payments on their loans, the value of mortgage loans we own will likely be impaired, potentially materially, as further described
above under the headings “Residential mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic may not make
payments of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all, which could negatively impact our
business” and “Multifamily and business purpose mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic may
not make payments of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all, which could negatively
impact our business”.
Prior to originating or acquiring loans or other assets for sale, we may undertake underwriting and due diligence efforts with respect to
various aspects of the loan or asset. When underwriting or conducting due diligence, we rely on resources and data available to us,
which may be limited, and we rely on investigations by third parties. We may also only conduct due diligence on a sample of a pool of
loans or assets we are acquiring and assume that the sample is representative of the entire pool. Our underwriting and due diligence
efforts may not reveal matters which could lead to losses. If our underwriting process is not robust enough or if we do not conduct
adequate due diligence, or the scope of our underwriting or due diligence is limited, we may incur losses. Losses could occur due to
the fact that a counterparty that sold us a loan or other asset (or that is the obligor or a party related to an obligor of a business purpose
loan we originate or acquire) refuses or is unable (e.g., due to its financial condition) to repay or repurchase that loan or asset or pay
damages to us if we determine subsequent to purchase that one or more of the representations or warranties made to us in connection
with the sale or origination was inaccurate.
Our ability to operate our business in the manner described above depends on the availability and productivity of our personnel and
the personnel of third-party vendors. To the extent our management or personnel, or those of our key vendors, are impacted in
significant numbers by natural disaster, outbreak of pandemic or epidemic disease, such as COVID-19, or other force majeure event,
our business and operating results may be negatively impacted.
In addition, when selling mortgage loans or acquiring servicing rights associated with residential mortgage loans, we typically make
representations and warranties to the purchaser or to other third parties regarding, among other things, certain characteristics of those
assets, including characteristics we seek to verify through our underwriting and due diligence efforts. If our representations and
warranties are inaccurate with respect to any asset, we may be obligated to repurchase that asset or pay damages, which may result in a
loss. We generally only establish reserves for potential liabilities relating to representations and warranties we make if we believe that
those liabilities are both probable and estimable, as determined in accordance with GAAP. As a result, we may not have reserves
relating to these potential liabilities or any reserves we may establish could be inadequate. Even if we obtain representations and
warranties from the counterparties from whom we acquired the loans or other assets or the borrowers to whom we made the loans, or
their related parties, they may not parallel the representations and warranties we make or may otherwise not protect us from losses,
31
including, for example, due to the fact that the counterparty may be insolvent or otherwise unable to make a payment to us at the time
we make a claim for repayment or damages for a breach of representation or warranty. Furthermore, to the extent we claim that
counterparties we have acquired loans from or borrowers to whom we made the loan, or their related parties, have breached their
representations and warranties to us, it may adversely impact our business relationship with those counterparties, including by
reducing the volume of business we conduct with those counterparties, which could negatively impact our ability to acquire loans and
our business. To the extent we have significant exposure to representations and warranties made to us by one or more counterparties
we acquire loans from, we may determine, as a matter of risk management, to reduce or discontinue loan acquisitions from those
counterparties, which could reduce the volume of residential loans we acquire and negatively impact our business and financial results.
Our portfolio of business-purpose loans held for investment represents a growing portion of our overall investment portfolio, and such
loans expose us to new and different risks from our traditional investments in jumbo residential mortgage loans.
A growing portion of our portfolio of loans held for investment is made up of business purpose mortgage loans. Business purpose
mortgage loans are directly exposed to losses resulting from default and foreclosure. Therefore, the value of the underlying property,
the creditworthiness and financial position of the borrower and the priority and enforceability of the lien will significantly impact the
value of such mortgages. Whether or not we have participated in the negotiation of the terms of any such mortgages, there can be no
assurance as to the adequacy of the protection of the terms of the loan, including the validity or enforceability of the loan and the
maintenance of the anticipated priority and perfection of the applicable security interests. Furthermore, claims may be asserted that
might interfere with enforcement of our rights. In the event of a foreclosure, we may assume direct ownership of the underlying real
estate. The liquidation proceeds upon sale of such real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a
loss to us. Any costs or delays involved in the completion of a foreclosure of the loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will
further reduce the proceeds and thus increase the loss.
Business purpose loans we own are subject to similar risks as those described above with respect to residential mortgage loans, to the
extent business purpose loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic do not timely remit payments of principal
and interest relating to their mortgage loans. In addition, if tenants who rent their residence from a multifamily or business purpose
loan borrower are unable to make rental payments, are unwilling to make rental payments, or a waiver of the requirement to make
rental payments on a timely basis, or at all, is available under the terms of any applicable forbearance or waiver agreement or program
(which rental payment forbearance or waiver program may be available as a result of a government-sponsored or -imposed program or
under any such agreement or program a landlord may otherwise offer to tenants), then the value of multifamily and business purpose
loans and multifamily and business purpose mortgage-backed securities we own will likely be impaired, potentially materially, as
further discussed under the heading “Multifamily and business purpose mortgage loan borrowers that have been negatively impacted
by the pandemic may not make payments of principal and interest relating to their mortgage loans on a timely basis, or at all, which
could negatively impact our business.”
A portion of our business purpose loan portfolio currently is, and in the future may be, delinquent and subject to increased risks of
credit loss for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, because the underlying property is too highly-leveraged or the
borrower experiences financial distress. Delinquent loans may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring,
which may entail, among other things, a reduction in the interest rate or capitalization of past due interest. However, even if
restructurings are successfully accomplished, risks still exist that borrowers will not be able or willing to maintain the restructured
payments or refinance the restructured mortgage upon maturity.
If restructuring is not successful, we may find it necessary to foreclose on the underlying property, and the foreclosure process may be
lengthy and expensive, including out-of-pocket costs and increased use of our internal resources. Borrowers may resist mortgage
foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses against us including, without limitation, numerous
lender liability claims and defenses, even when such assertions may have no basis in fact, or by filing for bankruptcy protection, in an
effort to prolong the foreclosure action and exert negotiating pressure on us to agree to a modification of the loan or a favorable buy-
out of the borrower’s position. In some states, foreclosure actions can sometimes take several years or more to litigate. Foreclosure
may create a negative public perception of the related mortgaged property, resulting in a decrease in its value. Even if we are
successful in foreclosing on a loan, the liquidation proceeds upon sale of the underlying real estate may not be sufficient to recover our
cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Furthermore, any costs or delays involved in the completion of a foreclosure of the loan
or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the proceeds and thus increase the loss. Any such reductions could
materially and adversely affect the value of the loan and could, in aggregate, have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, bridge loans on properties in transition may involve a greater risk of loss than traditional mortgage loans. This type of
loan is typically used for acquiring and rehabilitating or improving the quality of single-family residential investment properties and
generally serves as an interim financing solution for borrowers and/or properties prior to the borrower selling the property or
stabilizing the property and obtaining long-term permanent financing. The typical borrower of these bridge loans has often identified
32
an undervalued asset that has been under-managed or is located in a recovering market. If the market in which the asset is located fails
to improve according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management or the
value of the asset, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy the transitional loan, and we bear the risk that
we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, borrowers often use the proceeds of a conventional mortgage to repay a
bridge loan. Bridge loans therefore are subject to risks of a borrower’s inability to obtain permanent financing to repay the loan.
Bridge loans are also subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud, and other losses. In the event of any default under
bridge loans that may be held by us, we bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any
deficiency between the value of the mortgage collateral, and the principal amount and unpaid interest of the transitional loan and other
loans on the property (if any) that are senior to ours. To the extent we suffer such losses with respect to these loans, our business,
results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and expect to continue to engage in, securitization
transactions relating to real estate mortgage loans and HEIs. In addition, we have invested in and continue to invest in mortgage-
backed securities and other ABS issued in securitization transactions sponsored by other companies. These types of transactions
and investments expose us to potentially material risks.
Engaging in securitization transactions and other similar transactions generally requires us to incur short-term debt on a recourse basis
to finance the accumulation of loans or other assets (including HEIs) prior to securitization. If demand for investing in securitization
transactions weakens, we may be unable to complete the securitization of loans or other assets accumulated for that purpose, which
may hurt our business or financial results. In addition, in connection with engaging in securitization transactions, we engage in due
diligence with respect to the loans or other assets we are securitizing and make representations and warranties relating to those loans
and assets. The risks associated with incurring this type of debt in connection with securitization activity, the risks related to our
ability to complete securitization transactions after we have accumulated loans or assets for that purpose, and the risks associated with
the due diligence we conduct, and the representations and warranties we make, in connection with securitization activity are similar to
the risks associated with acquiring and originating loans with the intent to sell them to third parties, as described in the immediately
preceding risk factor titled “Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and plan to continue to
engage, in acquiring residential mortgage loans and originating business purpose mortgage loans with the intent to sell these loans to
third parties or hold them as investments. Similarly, we have engaged in the past, and continue to engage, in acquiring residential
MSRs. These types of transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks.”
When engaging in securitization transactions, we also prepare marketing and disclosure documentation, including term sheets, offering
documents, and prospectuses, that include disclosures regarding the securitization transactions and the assets being securitized. If our
marketing and disclosure documentation are alleged or found to contain inaccuracies or omissions, we may be liable under federal and
state securities laws (or under other laws) for damages to third parties that invest in these securitization transactions, including in
circumstances where we relied on a third party in preparing accurate disclosures, or we may incur other expenses and costs in
connection with disputing these allegations or settling claims. We have also engaged in selling or contributing commercial and
multifamily real estate loans, to third parties who, in turn, have securitized those loans. In these circumstances, we have in the past and
may in the future also prepare marketing and disclosure documentation, including documentation that is included in term sheets,
offering documents, and prospectuses relating to those securitization transactions. We could be liable under federal and state securities
laws (or under other laws) for damages to third parties that invest in these securitization transactions, including liability for disclosures
prepared by third parties or with respect to loans that we did not sell or contribute to the securitization. Additionally, we typically
retain various third-party service providers when we engage in securitization transactions, including underwriters or initial purchasers,
trustees, administrative and paying agents, and custodians, among others. We frequently contractually agree to indemnify these service
providers against various claims and losses they may suffer in connection with the provision of services to us and/or the securitization
trust. To the extent any of these service providers are liable for damages to third parties that have invested in these securitization
transactions, we may incur costs and expenses as a result of these indemnities.
In addition, the securitization trusts or other securitization entities that own collateral underlying securitization transactions may be
held liable for acts of third parties. For example, the CFPB has asserted the power to investigate and bring enforcement actions
directly against securitization entities for the bad acts of the entities’ servicers or subservicers. On December 13, 2021, in an action
brought by the CFPB, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in CFPB v. Nat’l Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust, No.
1:17-cv-1323-SB (D. Del.) (the “Student Loan ABS Litigation”), denied a motion to dismiss filed by a securitization trust, holding that
the trust is a “covered person” under the Dodd-Frank Act because it engages in the servicing of loans, even if through third-party
servicers or subservicers. The Court did not decide at this time whether the trust could be held liable for the conduct of its servicer(s)
or subservicer(s), only that the trust could be subject to an enforcement action related to the acts of its servicer. The Student Loan ABS
Litigation is ongoing, including through an appeal of the District Court’s decision on this motion to dismiss. If upheld on appeal, the
CFPB may rely on the decision as precedent in investigating and bringing future enforcement actions against other securitization
entities, including entities we sponsor or invest in.
33
There may be defects in the legal process and legal documents governing transactions in which securitization trusts and other
secondary purchasers take legal ownership of residential mortgage loans or other assets and establish their rights as first priority lien
holders on underlying mortgaged property or other assets. To the extent there are problems with the manner in which title and lien
priority rights were established or transferred, securitization transactions that we sponsored and third-party sponsored securitizations
that we hold investments in may experience losses, which could expose us to losses and could damage our ability to engage in future
securitization transactions.
Furthermore, we may sponsor or invest in securitization transactions of a type that are either new to Redwood or new securitization
products entirely. For example, during 2021, we co-sponsored a securitization of HEIs and completed our first securitization
collateralized by business purpose bridge loans. The risks described above may be particularly pronounced with new transactions (or
those new to Redwood) given the lower degree of institutional or industry knowledge of, experience with, and/or lack of a mature
market for, these products.
The effects of the pandemic have, at times, and could again negatively impact our operating platforms, including our business
purpose loan origination and residential loan purchase activities.
The effects of the pandemic have, at times, and could again adversely impact our business and operations due to temporary or lasting
changes involving the status, practices and procedures of our operating platforms, including with respect to loan origination and loan
purchase activities. For example, in the first half of 2020, the impact of the pandemic caused us to temporarily limit our residential
loan purchases and reduce our business purpose loan origination activities. Certain of these counterparties believed that we breached
actual or perceived obligations to them, and subjected us to litigation and claims, which we subsequently resolved or accrued for
estimated costs. Any future adverse impacts on our business or operations due to changes in the status, practices and procedures of our
operating platforms could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Moreover, in the event of renewed disruptions to the normal operation of mortgage finance markets, our operations focused on
acquiring and distributing residential mortgage loans and originating and distributing business purpose loans may not be able to
function efficiently because of, among other factors, an inability to access short-term or long-term financing for mortgage loans, a
disruption to the market for securitization transactions, or our inability to access these markets or execute securitization transactions.
Any or all of these impacts could result in reduced (or negative) mortgage banking income and gain on sale income, and reduced net
interest income, all of which would negatively impact our financial results.
In connection with our operating and investment activity, we rely on third parties to perform certain services, comply with
applicable laws and regulations, and carry out contractual covenants and terms, the failure of which by any of these third parties
may adversely impact our business and financial results.
In connection with our business of acquiring and originating loans, engaging in securitization transactions, and investing in third-party
issued securities and other assets, we rely on third party service providers to perform certain services, comply with applicable laws and
regulations, and carry out contractual covenants and terms. As a result, we are subject to the risks associated with a third party’s
failure or inability to perform, including failure to perform due to the impact of the pandemic on such third party’s ability to operate,
including due to the bankruptcy of one or more loan servicers, or reasons such as fraud, negligence, errors, miscalculations, workforce
or supply chain disruptions, or insolvency. For example, as a result of the pandemic, residential mortgage subservicers received an
unprecedented level of requests from mortgage borrowers for payment forbearances and, as a result, their operational infrastructures
may not have properly processed this increased volume of requests effectively or in a manner that is in our best interests. Many loan
servicers have been accused of improprieties in the handling of loan modification or foreclosure processes with respect to residential
mortgage loans that have gone into default. To the extent a third-party loan servicer fails to fully and properly perform its obligations,
loans and securities that we hold as investments may experience losses and securitizations that we have sponsored may experience
poor performance, and our ability to engage in future securitization transactions could be harmed. Moreover, the CFPB has indicated
that under the Biden presidential administration it intends to revitalize enforcement of fair lending laws and prioritize protecting
consumers facing financial hardship due to COVID-19 and racial equity including through supervisory and enforcement activity
directed at mortgage sub-servicer performance. As another example, our residential lending and business purpose lending segments
utilize third-party appraisals during the loan underwriting process, obtained on the collateral underlying each prospective mortgage.
The quality of these appraisals may vary widely in accuracy and consistency. The appraiser may feel pressure from the broker or
lender to provide an appraisal in the amount necessary to enable the originator to make the loan, whether or not the value of the
property justifies such an appraised value. Inaccurate or inflated appraisals may result in an increase in the severity of losses on the
mortgage loans, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, our business purpose loan origination platforms may utilize third party inspectors in connection with funding advances
on bridge loans for rehabilitation or ground-up construction. These third parties may be required to certify a borrower’s eligibility for
advances based on the satisfaction of construction milestones. In the past we have experienced, and may in the future experience,
fraudulent or negligent activity among borrowers and certain of these third parties that has led to the disbursement of under-
collateralized funds and could cause us to incur financial losses on loans we have originated.
34
For some of the loans that we hold and for some of the loans we sell or securitize, we hold the right to service those loans and we
retain a sub-servicer to service those loans. In these circumstances we are exposed to certain risks, including, without limitation, that
we may not be able to enter into subservicing agreements on favorable terms to us or at all, or that the sub-servicer may not properly
service the loan in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or the contractual provisions governing their sub-servicing role,
and that we would be held liable for the sub-servicer’s improper acts or omissions, whether resulting from a change in law effected or
prompted by the Student Loan ABS Litigation, or otherwise, as discussed above under the Risk Factor titled “Through certain of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and expect to continue to engage in, securitization transactions relating to
real estate mortgage loans and HEIs. In addition, we have invested in and continue to invest in mortgage-backed securities and other
ABS issued in securitization transactions sponsored by other companies. These types of transactions and investments expose us to
potentially material risks”. Additionally, in its capacity as a servicer of residential mortgage loans, a sub-servicer will have access to
borrowers’ non-public personal information, and we could incur liability in connection with a data breach relating to a sub-servicer, as
discussed further below under the risk factor titled “Maintaining cybersecurity and data security is important to our business and a
breach of our cybersecurity or data security could result in serious harm to our reputation and have a material adverse impact on our
business and financial results.” When we retain a sub-servicer we are generally also obligated to fund any obligation of the sub-
servicer to make advances on behalf of a delinquent loan obligor. To the extent any one sub-servicer counterparty services a
significant percentage of the loans with respect to which we own the servicing rights, the risks associated with our use of that sub-
servicer are concentrated around this single sub-servicer counterparty. To the extent that there are significant amounts of advances that
need to be funded in respect of loans where we own the servicing right, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and
financial results.
In addition, we have participated in various investments structured as joint ventures or partnerships with unaffiliated third parties.
Some of these joint venture entities rely, in part, on their members or partners to make committed capital contributions in order to pay
the purchase price for investments, to fund shortfalls in capital under related financing agreements, or to fund indemnification or
repurchase obligations related to securitization. A failure by one of the members to make such capital contributions for amounts
required could result in events of default under the terms of the investment or the related financing and a loss of our investment in the
joint venture entity and its related investments. For example, in connection with our servicer advance investments, we consolidate an
entity that was formed to finance servicing advances and for which we, through our control of an affiliated partnership entity (the "SA
Buyer") formed to invest in servicer advance investments and excess MSRs, are the primary beneficiary. SA Buyer has agreed to
purchase all future arising servicer advances under certain residential mortgage servicing agreements. SA Buyer relies, in part, on its
members to make committed capital contributions in order to pay the purchase price for future servicer advances. A failure by any or
all of the members to make such capital contributions for amounts required to fund servicer advances could result in an event of
default under our servicer advance financing and a complete loss of our investment in SA Buyer and its servicer advance investments
and excess MSRs. Additionally, to the extent that the servicer of the underlying mortgage loans (who is unaffiliated with us except
through their co-investment in SA Buyer and the related financing entity) fails to recover the servicer advances in which we have
invested, or takes longer than we expect to recover such advances, the value of our investment could be adversely affected and we
could fail to achieve our expected return and suffer losses.
We also rely on corporate trustees to act on behalf of us and other holders of ABS in enforcing our rights as security holders. Under
the terms of most ABS we hold, we do not have the right to directly enforce remedies against the issuer of the security, but instead
must rely on a trustee to act on behalf of us and other security holders. Should a trustee not be required to take action under the terms
of the securities, or fail to take action, we could experience losses.
Our business could also be negatively impacted by the inability of other third-party vendors we rely on to perform and operate
effectively, including vendors that provide IT services, legal and accounting services, or other operational support services. Further, an
inability of our counterparties to make or satisfy the conditions or representations and warranties in agreements they have entered into
with us could also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
35
Our ability to execute or participate in future securitization transactions, including, in particular, securitizations of residential and
business purpose mortgage loans, could be delayed, limited, or precluded by legislative and regulatory reforms applicable to asset-
backed securities and the institutions that sponsor, service, rate, or otherwise participate in or contribute to the successful
execution of a securitization transaction. Other factors could also limit, delay, or preclude our ability to execute securitization
transactions. These legislative, regulatory, and other factors could also reduce the returns we would otherwise expect to earn in
connection with executing securitization transactions.
Various federal and state laws and regulations impact our ability to execute securitization transactions, including the Dodd-Frank Act.
Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act relate, among other things, to the legal and regulatory framework under which ABS, including
RMBS and securities backed by business purpose mortgage loans, are issued through the execution of securitization transactions. In
addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have published regulations
relating to the issuance of ABS, including RMBS. Additional federal or state laws and regulations that could affect our ability to
execute future securitization transactions could be proposed, enacted, or implemented. In addition, various federal and state agencies
and law enforcement authorities, as well as private litigants, have initiated and may, in the future, initiate additional broad-based
enforcement actions or claims, the resolution of which may include industry-wide changes to the way residential mortgage loans are
originated, transferred, serviced, and securitized, and any of these changes could also affect our ability to execute future securitization
transactions. For an example, please refer to the risk factor titled “Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments and the
actions of governmental authorities and entities may adversely affect our business and the value of, and the returns on, mortgages,
mortgage-related securities, and other assets we own or may acquire in the future.”
Rating agencies can affect our ability to execute or participate in a securitization transaction, or reduce the returns we would otherwise
expect to earn from executing securitization transactions, not only by deciding not to publish ratings for our securitization transactions
(or deciding not to consent to the inclusion of those ratings in the prospectuses or other documents we file with the SEC relating to
securitization transactions), but also by altering the criteria and process they follow in publishing ratings. Rating agencies could alter
their ratings processes or criteria after we have accumulated loans or other assets for securitization in a manner that effectively reduces
the value of those previously acquired or originated loans or requires that we incur additional costs to comply with those processes and
criteria. For example, to the extent investors in a securitization transaction would have significant exposure to representations and
warranties made by us or by one or more counterparties we acquire loans from, rating agencies may determine that this exposure
increases investment risks relating to the securitization transaction. Rating agencies could reach this conclusion either because of our
financial condition or the financial condition of one or more counterparties we acquire loans from, or because of the aggregate amount
of loan-related representations and warranties (or other contingent liabilities) we, or one or more counterparties we acquire loans from,
have made or have exposure to. In addition, our ability to continue to securitize residential mortgage loans in the future will depend, in
part, on the rating agencies’ assessment of the investment risks that result from the ability-to-repay regulations and the TILA-RESPA
Integrated Disclosure Rule (TRID). This includes, for example, how they assess investment risks associated with (a) non-material
errors in loan-related disclosures made to mortgage borrowers, (b) residential mortgage loans that have an interest-only payment
feature, or (c) loans under which the borrower has a debt-to-income ratio of more than 43%. These types of loans have historically
accounted for a significant amount of the loans we have securitized, but they are not considered “qualified mortgages” under the
ability-to-repay regulations. Since these provisions were implemented over the past several years, the rating agencies’ assessment of
these risks has generally been consistent with ours, but to the extent their assessments diverge from ours, this could negatively impact
our ability to execute securitization transactions. If, as a result of any of the foregoing issues, rating agencies place limitations on our
ability to execute future securitization transactions or impose unfavorable ratings levels or conditions on our securitization
transactions, it could reduce the returns we would otherwise expect to earn from executing these transactions and negatively impact
our business and financial results.
Furthermore, other matters, such as (i) accounting standards applicable to securitization transactions and (ii) capital and leverage
requirements applicable to banks’ and other regulated financial institutions’ holdings of ABS, could result in less investor demand for
securities issued through securitization transactions we execute or increased competition from other institutions that originate, acquire,
and hold residential and business purpose mortgage loans, multifamily real estate loans, and other types of assets and execute
securitization transactions.
36
Our ability to profitably execute or participate in future securitizations transactions, including, in particular, securitizations of
residential and business purpose mortgage loans, is dependent on numerous factors and if we are not able to achieve our desired
level of profitability or if we incur losses in connection with executing or participating in future securitizations it could have a
material adverse impact on our business and financial results.
There are a number of factors that can have a significant impact on whether a securitization transaction that we execute or participate
in is profitable to us or results in a loss. One of these factors is the price we pay for (or cost of originating) the mortgage loans that we
securitize, which, in the case of residential mortgage loans, for example, is impacted by the level of competition in the marketplace for
acquiring mortgage loans and the relative desirability to originators of retaining mortgage loans as investments or selling them to third
parties such as us. Another factor that impacts the profitability of a securitization transaction is the cost to us of the short-term debt
that we use to finance our holdings of mortgage loans prior to securitization, which cost is affected by a number of factors including
the availability of this type of financing to us, the interest rate on this type of financing, the duration of the financing we incur, and the
percentage of our mortgage loans for which third parties are willing to provide short-term financing.
After we acquire or originate mortgage loans that we intend to securitize, we can also suffer losses if the value of those loans declines
prior to securitization. Declines in the value of a mortgage loan, for example, can be due to, among other things, changes in interest
rates, changes in the credit quality of the loan, and changes in the projected yields required by investors to invest in securitization
transactions. To the extent we seek to hedge against a decline in loan value due to changes in interest rates, there is a cost of hedging
that also affects whether a securitization is profitable. Other factors that can significantly affect whether a securitization transaction is
profitable to us include the criteria and conditions that rating agencies apply and require when they assign ratings to the mortgage-
backed securities issued in our securitization transactions, including the percentage of mortgage-backed securities issued in a
securitization transaction that the rating agencies will assign a triple-A rating to, which is also referred to as a rating agency
subordination level. Rating agency subordination levels can be impacted by numerous factors, including, without limitation, the credit
quality of the loans securitized, the geographic distribution of the loans to be securitized, and the structure of the securitization
transaction and other applicable rating agency criteria. All other factors being equal, the greater the percentage of the mortgage-backed
securities issued in a securitization transaction that the rating agencies will assign a triple-A rating to, the more profitable the
transaction will be to us.
The price that investors in mortgage-backed securities will pay for securities issued in our securitization transactions also has a
significant impact on the profitability of the transactions to us, and these prices are impacted by numerous market forces and factors.
In addition, the underwriter(s) or placement agent(s) we select for securitization transactions, and the terms of their engagement, can
also impact the profitability of our securitization transactions. Also, transaction costs incurred in executing transactions impact the
profitability of our securitization transactions and any liability that we may incur, or may be required to reserve for, in connection with
executing a transaction can cause a loss to us. To the extent that we are not able to profitably execute future securitizations of
residential or business purpose mortgage loans or other assets, including for the reasons described above or for other reasons, it could
have a material adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Our past and future loan origination and securitization activities or other past and future business or operating activities or
practices could expose us to litigation, which may adversely affect our business and financial results.
Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have in the past engaged in or participated in loan origination and securitization
transactions relating to residential mortgage loans, business purpose mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, commercial real
estate loans, HEIs, and other types of assets. In the future we expect to continue to engage in or participate in loan origination and
securitization transactions, including, in particular, securitization transactions relating to residential and business purpose mortgage
loans and HEIs, and may also engage in other types of securitization transactions or similar transactions. Sequoia securitization entities
we sponsored issued ABS under our SEMT™ label, backed by residential mortgage loans held by these Sequoia entities. Similarly,
CoreVest securitization entities (or “CAFL entities”) we sponsor issued ABS under our CAFL™ label, backed by business purpose
mortgage loans held by these CAFL entities. In Acacia securitization transactions we participated in, Acacia securitization entities
issued ABS backed by securities and other assets held by these Acacia entities. As a result of declining property values, increasing
defaults, changes in interest rates, and other factors, the aggregate cash flows from the loans held by the Sequoia and CAFL entities
and the securities and other assets held by the Acacia entities may be insufficient to repay in full the principal amount of ABS issued
by these securitization entities. While we are not directly liable for any of the ABS issued by these entities, third parties who hold the
ABS issued by these entities may nevertheless try to hold us liable for any losses they experience, including through claims under
federal and state securities laws or claims for breaches of representations and warranties we made in connection with engaging in these
securitization transactions. Additionally, holders of ABS issued by CAFL entities prior to our acquisition of CoreVest may make
claims against us for losses arising from activities that occurred prior to our acquisition.
37
For example, as discussed below in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, on December 23, 2009, the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Seattle filed a claim in the Superior Court for the State of Washington against us and our subsidiary, Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc. The complaint related in part to residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued by a Sequoia
securitization entity and alleged that, at the time of issuance, we, Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc. and the underwriters made various
misstatements and omissions about these securities in violation of Washington state law. We have also been named in other similar
lawsuits and may again be named in such lawsuits in the future. A further discussion of these lawsuits is set forth in Note 16 to the
Financial Statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For another example, refer to the risk factor below, titled “Litigation of
the type initiated against various trustees of residential mortgage-backed securitization transactions issued prior to financial crisis of
2007-2008 (“RMBS trustee litigation”) negatively impacted, and could further negatively impact, the value of securities we hold,
could expose us to indemnification claims, and could impact the profitability of our participation in future securitization
transactions.”
Other aspects of our business operations or practices could also expose us to litigation. In the ordinary course of our business we enter
into agreements relating to, among other things, loans we originate and acquire and investments we make, assets and loans we sell,
financing transactions, venture capital investments, third parties we retain to provide us with goods and services, and our leased office
space. We also regularly enter into confidentiality agreements with third parties under which we receive confidential information. If
we breach any of these agreements, we could be subject to claims for damages and related litigation. For example, when we sell whole
loans in the secondary market, we are required to make customary representations and warranties about such loans to the loan
purchaser. Our mortgage loan sale agreements may require us to repurchase or substitute loans or indemnify investors in the event we
breach a representation or warranty made to the loan purchaser. In addition, we may be required to repurchase loans as a result of
borrower fraud or in the event of early payment default on a mortgage loan. The remedies available to a purchaser of mortgage loans
may be broader than those available to us against the borrower or correspondent. Further, if a purchaser enforces its remedies against
us, we may not be able to enforce the remedies we have against the borrower or correspondent seller. Financing for repurchased loans
may be limited or unavailable, and may incur a steep discount to their repurchase price from financing counterparties. They are also
typically sold at a significant discount to the loan's unpaid principal balance. Significant repurchase activity could harm our business,
cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.
As a result of past or future actions of our business purpose lending platforms, we may be subject to lender liability claims, and if we
are held liable under such claims, we could be subject to losses. A number of judicial decisions have upheld the right of borrowers to
sue lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.” Generally, lender liability
is founded on the premise that a lender has either violated a duty, whether implied or contractual, of good faith and fair dealing owed
to the borrower or has assumed a degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower
or its other creditors or stockholders. We could also be subject to litigation, including class action litigation, or regulatory enforcement
action, including enforcement action initiated by the CFPB, relating to residential mortgage servicer performance failing to adhere to
requirements governing forbearance and foreclosure as a result of the pandemic or other servicer misconduct. As discussed above
under the Risk Factor heading, “Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and expect to
continue to engage in, securitization transactions relating to real estate mortgage loans and HEIs. In addition, we have invested in
and continue to invest in mortgage-backed securities and other ABS issued in securitization transactions sponsored by other
companies. These types of transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks”, the Student Loan ABS Litigation may
introduce additional theories of securitization entity liability resulting from third-party servicer misconduct. Additionally, federal
regulators under the Biden presidential administration have signaled a renewed focus on fair lending and fair servicing guidelines and
practices to identify potential discriminatory loss mitigation and foreclosure practices and hold residential mortgage servicers
accountable. We cannot assure investors that such claims will not arise through litigation or regulatory action or that we will not be
subject to significant liability if a claim of this type did arise. Additionally, we could be subject to such claims relating to activities that
occurred at 5 Arches and CoreVest prior to, or following, our acquisitions of those platforms.
We are also subject to various other laws and regulations relating to our business and operations, including, without limitation, privacy
laws and regulations and labor and employment laws and regulations, and if we fail to comply with these laws and regulations we
could also be subjected to claims for damages and litigation. In particular, if we fail to maintain the confidentiality of consumers’
personal or financial information we obtain in the course of our business (such as social security numbers), we could be exposed to
losses. A further discussion of some of these risks is set forth in the risk factor titled “Maintaining cybersecurity and data security is
important to our business and a breach of our cybersecurity or data security could result in serious harm to our reputation and have a
material adverse impact on our business and financial results.”
Defending a lawsuit can consume significant resources and may divert management’s attention from our operations. We may be
required to establish or increase reserves for potential losses from litigation, which could be material. To the extent we are
unsuccessful in our defense of any lawsuit, we could suffer losses which could be in excess of any reserves established relating to that
lawsuit) and these losses could be material.
38
Litigation of the type initiated against various trustees of residential mortgage-backed securitization transactions issued prior to
financial crisis of 2007-2008 (“RMBS trustee litigation”) during 2017 negatively impacted, and could further negatively impact,
the value of securities we hold, could expose us to indemnification claims, and could impact the profitability of our participation in
future securitization transactions.
Litigation against RMBS trustees has related to, among other things, claims by certain investors in the RMBS issued in those
transactions that the trustees of those transactions breached their obligations to investors by, among other things, not appropriately
investigating and pursuing remedies against the originators and servicers of the underlying mortgage loans. We are not a party to any
RMBS trustee litigation; however, RMBS trustee litigation has, in the past, negatively impacted the value of certain residential
mortgage-backed securities issued prior to the crisis (“legacy RMBS”) that were held in our investment portfolio. The value of other
legacy RMBS we continue to hold or acquire could be impacted in the future. In particular, trustees of various legacy RMBS
transactions that have been the subject of RMBS trustee litigation have withheld funds from investors in the RMBS issued in those
transactions by asserting that, pursuant to their indemnification rights against the securitization trusts established under the applicable
transaction documents, they are entitled to apply those funds to offset litigation expenses. Further, certain trustees have asserted that
their indemnification rights entitle them to withhold large lump sum amounts to hold and apply to anticipated future litigation
expenses. Similar holdbacks by trustees of legacy RMBS transactions could result in losses to the value of our portfolio of securities in
the future, which losses could be material.
Our acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest, or future acquisition targets, could fail to improve our business or result in diminished
returns, could expose us to new or increased risks, and could increase our cost of doing business.
During 2019, we completed the acquisitions of two business purpose real estate loan origination platforms, 5 Arches and CoreVest,
which we subsequently combined into one platform to originate business purpose loans. In the future, we may engage in additional
business acquisition activity. If we experience challenges related to business acquisitions that we do not anticipate or cannot mitigate,
the returns we expected with respect to these investments may not be generated. If our assumptions are wrong, or if market conditions
change, we may, as a result, not have capital available for deployment into more profitable businesses and investments.
Our business purpose loan origination platform is dependent upon conditions in the investor real estate market, and conditions that
negatively impact this market may reduce demand for our loans and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Our borrowers are primarily owners of residential rental and small multifamily properties, and residential properties for
rehabilitation and subsequent resale or rental. Accordingly, the success of our business is closely tied to the overall success of the
investors and small business owners in these markets. Various changes in real estate conditions may impact this market. Any negative
trends in such real estate conditions may reduce demand for our products and services and, as a result, adversely affect our results of
operations.
Directly originating mortgage loans could also expose us to increased risks compared to our historical mortgage banking activities,
including increased regulation by federal and state authorities, challenges in effectively integrating operations, failure to maintain
effective internal controls, procedures and policies, and other unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays
associated with the acquisitions or the business of originating mortgage loans. Additionally, CoreVest engages in and sponsors
securitization transactions under the CAFL™ label relating to SFR mortgage loans and, more recently, bridge loans, and in connection
with the acquisition of CoreVest, we acquired, and we expect to continue to retain, mortgage-backed securities issued in CAFL™
securitization transactions. These securitization transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks, in the same
manner as described in the risk factor titled “Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and
expect to continue to engage in, securitization transactions relating to real estate mortgage loans. In addition, we have invested in and
continue to invest in mortgage-backed securities and other ABS issued in securitization transactions sponsored by other companies.
These types of transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks.”
Additionally, in connection with our acquisitions of CoreVest and 5 Arches, a portion of the purchase price of each acquisition was
allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. In any future acquisition transaction, a portion of the purchase price may also be allocated
to goodwill and intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price which is allocated to goodwill and intangible assets is determined
by the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable assets acquired. Accounting standards require that we test goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment at least annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise). As a result of the pandemic and
its impact on our business, following an impairment assessment, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment expense and wrote
down the entire $89 million remaining value of our goodwill asset associated with our acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest in the
first quarter of 2020. In conjunction with our assessment of goodwill, we also assessed our intangible assets for impairment at March
31, 2020 and determined they were not impaired. As of December 31, 2021, $42 million of intangible assets were recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet. If, in the future, we determine intangible assets are impaired, we will be required to write down the value
of this asset, as we did with our goodwill asset, up to the entire balance. Any write-down would have a negative effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
39
Our cash balances and cash flows may be insufficient relative to our cash needs.
We need cash to make interest payments, to post as collateral to counterparties and lenders who provide us with short-term debt
financing and who engage in other transactions with us, for working capital, to fund REIT dividend distribution requirements, to
comply with financial covenants and regulatory requirements, to fund general and administrative expenses, and for other needs and
purposes. We may also need cash to repay short-term borrowings when due or in the event the fair values of assets that serve as
collateral for that debt decline, the terms of short-term debt become less attractive, or for other reasons. In addition, we may need to
use cash to post in response to margin calls relating to various derivative instruments we hold as the values of these derivatives
change. Over the longer term, we may need cash to fund the repayment of outstanding convertible notes and exchangeable securities
that mature in 2023, 2024, and 2025.
Our sources of cash flow include the principal and interest payments on the loans and securities we own, asset sales, securitizations,
short-term borrowing, issuing long-term debt, and issuing stock. Our sources of cash may not be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs.
Cash flows from principal repayments could be reduced if prepayments slow or if credit quality deteriorates. For example, for some of
our assets, cash flows are “locked-out” and we receive less than our pro-rata share of principal payment cash flows in the early years
of the investment.
Additionally, the effects of the pandemic have, at times, adversely impacted and could again adversely impact our ability to access
debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all. Any disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deteriorations in
credit and financing conditions may affect our ability and mortgage loan borrowers’ ability to make regular payments of principal and
interest (e.g., due to unemployment, underemployment, or reduced income or revenues, including as a result of tenants' inability to
make rental payments) or to access savings or capital necessary to fund business operations or replace or renew maturing liabilities on
a timely basis, and may adversely affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities. Any of foregoing circumstances could increase
margin calls under our borrowing facilities, affect our ability to meet liquidity, net worth, and leverage covenants under our borrowing
facilities or have a material adverse effect on the value of investment assets we hold or our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Our minimum dividend distribution requirements could exceed our cash flows if our income as calculated for tax purposes
significantly exceeds our net cash flows. This could occur when taxable income (including non-cash income such as discount
amortization and interest accrued on negative amortizing loans) exceeds cash flows received. The Internal Revenue Code provides a
limited relief provision concerning certain items of non-cash income; however, this provision may not sufficiently reduce our cash
dividend distribution requirement. In the event that our liquidity needs exceed our access to liquidity, we may need to sell assets at an
inopportune time, thus reducing our earnings. In an adverse cash flow situation, we may not be able to sell assets effectively and our
REIT status or our solvency could be threatened. Further discussion of the risk associated with maintaining our REIT status is set forth
in the risk factor titled “We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and, as such, are required to meet certain tests in order to maintain
our REIT status. This adds complexity and costs to running our business and exposes us to additional risks.”
Initiating new business activities or significantly expanding or reorganizing our existing business activities may expose us to new
risks, could fail to result in the expected benefits, and could increase our cost of doing business.
Initiating new business activities or significantly expanding or reorganizing existing business activities, including through acquisitions
or corporate structure changes, are ways to grow our business, implement our long-term strategy, and respond to changing
circumstances in our industry; however, they may expose us to new risks and regulatory compliance requirements. We cannot be
certain that we will be able to manage these risks and compliance requirements effectively. Furthermore, our efforts may not succeed
and any revenues we earn from any new or expanded business initiative or reorganization may not be sufficient to offset the initial and
ongoing costs of that initiative or reorganization, which would result in a loss with respect to that initiative or reorganization.
For example, in recent years, we have announced several new initiatives to expand our mortgage banking and investment activities,
including by expanding our mortgage banking activities to include the acquisition and origination of business purpose loans secured
by non-owner occupied rental properties and bridge loans, completing the acquisitions of two business purpose real estate loan
origination platforms, reorganizing those two acquired origination platforms into a single platform, and optimizing the size and target
returns of our investment portfolio. We have also made investments in subordinate securities backed by re-performing and non-
performing residential loans, multifamily securities, HEIs and securities collateralized by HEIs, excess MSR and servicer advance
investments collateralized by residential and multifamily loans, a whole loan investment fund created to acquire light-renovation
multifamily loans, and a multifamily investment fund to acquire workforce housing properties. Additionally, we have made, and
continue to make, early-stage venture capital investments through our RWT Horizons™ investment platform. Further discussion of
these business changes is set forth in the risk factor titled “Decisions we make about our business strategy and investments, as well as
decisions about raising capital or returning capital to shareholders (through dividends or common stock repurchases), could fail to
improve our business and results of operations.”
40
In connection with initiating new business activities or expanding or reorganizing existing business activities, to support growth or for
other business reasons, we may create new subsidiaries or alter or reorganize our corporate structure. Frequently, these subsidiaries
would be wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by Redwood, but we may also create or participate in partnerships and joint ventures
with third-party co-investors and in those cases, the entities may be partially-owned by Redwood. The creation of those subsidiaries or
the implementation of any partnership, joint venture or reorganization may increase our administrative costs and expose us to other
legal and reporting obligations, including, for example, because new subsidiaries may be incorporated in states other than Maryland or
may be established in a foreign jurisdiction, or new or restructured business activities may be subject to additional regulation. Any
new subsidiary we create may elect, together with us, to be treated as, or similarly to, a REIT (e.g., a qualified REIT subsidiary) or as a
taxable REIT subsidiary. Taxable REIT subsidiaries are wholly-owned or partially-owned subsidiaries of a REIT that pay corporate
income tax on the income they generate. A taxable REIT subsidiary is not able to deduct its dividends paid to its parent in determining
its taxable income and any dividends paid to the parent are generally recognized as income at the parent level. With respect to
subsidiaries formed as partnerships or joint ventures with third-party co-investors, we may be a passive partner or investor, or
otherwise unable to exert operational control over these subsidiaries, which may expose us to risks associated with the conduct of
those in control, including total loss of our investment.
We regularly evaluate our corporate structure in light of our business activities, opportunities and strategic growth plans. For example,
growth and expansion of our mortgage banking platforms may reach a scale at which our current corporate structure (and/or which of
the entities within our structure should elect to be taxed as a REIT, as a qualified REIT subsidiary, or as a taxable REIT subsidiary),
should be altered or reorganized to further support our strategic and business plans. As part of these regular evaluations, we generally
compare maintaining our current corporate structure and REIT elections to a range of alternatives including creating new subsidiaries,
altering our REIT elections, participating in partnerships or joint ventures, and various structural changes that would involve the
separation of one of more of our business units or segments. Any such alteration or reorganization of our corporate structure or our
REIT elections could be complex, time consuming, and involve significant initial transaction costs. Additionally, any such alteration
or reorganization could expose us to new risks or potential liabilities for failure to meet regulatory or tax-related requirements,
including the maintenance of our REIT status. If we were to determine to pursue an alteration or reorganization of our corporate
structure, it is not certain that we would be successful in completing it, or if we did, that we would be able to manage any associated
new risks, complexities or compliance requirements. Moreover, the evaluation, analysis and strategic planning that originally
supported any such alteration or reorganization could fail to result in the expected benefits, including because of changed
circumstances or unanticipated risks, or not be sufficient to offset the initial and ongoing costs of pursuing it. Our business and the
markets we operate in are constantly evolving and our efforts to initiate new business activities or significantly expand or reorganize
existing business activities, including through acquisitions or structural changes, as ways to grow our business, implement our long-
term strategy, and respond to changing circumstances may not be successful and may expose us to new risks and regulatory
compliance requirements.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
Our future success depends on the continued service and availability of skilled personnel, including our executive officers and other
business leaders that are part of our management team. To the extent personnel we attempt to hire, or have already hired, are
concerned that economic, regulatory, or other factors could impact our ability to maintain or expand our current level of business, it
could negatively impact our ability to hire or retain the personnel we need to operate our business. Furthermore, as unemployment
rates have decreased and/or stabilized at normal levels, the market for attracting and retaining human resources has become
increasingly competitive and costly. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain key personnel in line with
historical cost levels, or at all.
Additionally, the effects of the pandemic have, at times, adversely impacted, and may, in the future, adversely impact our financial
condition and results of operations due to interrupted service and availability of personnel, and an inability to recruit, attract and retain
skilled personnel. To the extent our management teams or personnel are impacted in significant numbers by the pandemic and are not
available or allowed to conduct work, our business and operating results may be negatively impacted. Moreover, the negative impacts
of the pandemic necessitated a reduction in our workforce in April 2020 and additional reductions in our workforce could become
necessary if business or economic conditions deteriorate, which could negatively impact our business and results of operations.
Additionally, the pandemic could negatively impact our ability to ensure operational continuity in the event our business continuity
plan is not effective or is ineffectually implemented or deployed during a disruption.
Our technology infrastructure and systems are important and any significant disruption or breach of the security of this
infrastructure or these systems could have an adverse effect on our business. We also rely on technology infrastructure and
systems of third parties who provide services to us and with whom we transact business.
41
We are dependent on the secure, efficient, and uninterrupted operation of our technology infrastructure, as well as those of certain
third parties and affiliates upon which we rely, including computer systems, related software applications and data centers. The
websites and computer/telecommunication networks we rely upon must accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver frequently
updated information, the accuracy and timeliness of which is critical to our business. Our technology must be able to facilitate loan
application and loan acquisition experiences that equal or exceed the experience provided by our competitors. In addition, we rely on
our computer hardware and software systems in order to analyze, acquire, and manage our investments, manage the operations and
risks associated with our business, assets, and liabilities, and prepare our financial statements. Some of these systems are located at our
offices and some are maintained by third party vendors or located at facilities maintained by third parties. We also rely on technology
infrastructure and systems of third parties who provide services to us and with whom we transact business. Any significant
interruption in the availability or functionality of these systems could impair our access to liquidity, damage our reputation, and have
an adverse effect on our operations and on our ability to timely and accurately report our financial results.
We have or may in the future experience service disruptions and failures caused by system or software failure, fire, power outages,
telecommunications failures, team member misconduct, human error, computer hackers, computer viruses and disabling devices,
malicious or destructive code, denial of service or information, as well as natural disasters, the pandemic, and other similar events, and
our business continuity and disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all situations. For example, in response to the
pandemic in March 2020, we shifted to having most of our team members work remotely, with team members remotely accessing our
secure networks through their home networks. Many of our employees, depending on their role and job functions, continue to work
remotely on a full-time or hybrid basis, and our security protocols for remote work may prove to be inadequate to prevent
unauthorized access or disruption to information systems. The implementation of technology changes and upgrades to maintain
current and integrate new technology systems may also cause service interruptions. Prolonged outages in our or third parties’ systems
upon which we rely may not have a suitable backup or workaround. Any such disruption could interrupt or delay our ability to provide
services to our loan sellers and loan applicants, and could also impair the ability of third parties to provide critical services to us.
In addition, any breach of the security of these systems could have an adverse effect on our operations and the preparation of our
financial statements. Steps we have taken to provide for the security of our systems and data may not effectively prevent others from
obtaining improper access to our systems or data. Improper access could expose us to risks of data loss or the unavailability of key
systems, reputational damage, increased regulatory scrutiny and/or fines/penalties, fraud, litigation, and liabilities to third parties, and
otherwise disrupt our operations. Further discussion is set forth in the risk factor titled “Maintaining cybersecurity and data security
and complying with data privacy laws and regulations are important to our business and a breach of our cybersecurity or data
security or a violation of law could result in serious harm to our reputation and have a material adverse impact on our business and
financial results”.
We may not be able to make technological improvements as quickly as demanded by our loan sellers and borrowers, which could
harm our ability to attract loan sellers and borrowers and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven
products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial and lending institutions to better
serve clients and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our loans sellers and
borrowers by using technology, such as mobile and online services, like our Redwood Live application and customer portal, to provide
products and services that will satisfy demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. We may
not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services as quickly as competitors or be successful in
marketing these products and services to our loan sellers and borrowers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change
affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to attract investors, or loan sellers and borrowers, and adversely affect
our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our business could be adversely affected by deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over
financial reporting.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent
all errors, misstatements, or misrepresentations. While management continues to review the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or
internal controls over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. Deficiencies,
particularly material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting which have occurred or which
may occur in the future could result in misstatements of our financial results, restatements of our financial statements, a decline in our
stock price, or an otherwise material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial results, or liquidity and could cause
investors and creditors to lose confidence in our reported financial results.
42
Our risk management efforts may not be effective.
We could incur substantial losses and our business operations could be disrupted if we are unable to effectively identify, manage,
monitor, and mitigate financial risks, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, liquidity risk, and other market-related
risks, as well as operational risks related to our business, assets, and liabilities, such as mortgage operations risk, legal and compliance
risk, human resources-related risk, data privacy, cybersecurity and technology-related risk, and financial reporting risk. Our risk
management policies, procedures, and techniques may not be sufficient to identify all of the risks we are exposed to, mitigate the risks
we have identified for mitigation, or to identify additional risks to which we may become subject in the future. Expansion of our
business activities, including through acquisitions, generally also results in our being exposed to risks that we have not previously
been exposed to or may increase our exposure to certain types of risks and we may not effectively identify, manage, monitor, and
mitigate these risks as our business activity changes or increases. Further discussion is set forth in the risk factor titled “Initiating new
business activities or significantly expanding existing business activities may expose us to new risks and will increase our cost of
doing business.”
We could be harmed by misconduct or fraud that is difficult to detect.
We are exposed to risks relating to misconduct by our employees, contractors we use, or other third parties with whom we have
relationships. For example, our employees could execute unauthorized transactions, use our assets improperly or without
authorization, compromise our physical or technological security, perform improper activities, use confidential information for
improper purposes, or mis-record or otherwise try to hide improper activities from us. This type of misconduct could also relate to
loan administration or other services that we provide for others. This type of misconduct can be difficult to detect and if not prevented
or detected could result in claims or enforcement actions against us or losses. Accordingly, misconduct by employees, contractors, or
others could subject us to losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Our controls may not be effective in
detecting this type of activity.
Inadvertent errors, including, for example, errors in the implementation of information technology systems, could subject us to
financial loss, litigation, or regulatory action.
Our employees, contractors we use, and other third parties with whom we have relationships may make inadvertent errors, or fall prey
to social engineering attacks or other fraud schemes, that could subject us to financial losses, claims, or enforcement actions. These
types of errors could include, but are not limited to, mistakes in executing, recording, or reporting transactions we enter into for
ourselves or with respect to assets we manage for others, or mistakes related to settling payment obligations, including with respect to
wire transfers. Errors in the implementation of information technology systems, compliance systems and procedures, or other
operational systems and procedures could also interrupt our business or subject us to financial losses, claims, or enforcement actions.
Errors could also result in the inadvertent disclosure of mortgage-borrower non-public personal information. Inadvertent errors expose
us to the risk of material losses until the errors are detected and remedied prior to the occurrence of any loss. The risk of errors may be
greater for business activities that are new for us or have non-standardized terms, for areas of our business that we are have rapidly
expanded or are in the process of expanding, or for areas of our business that rely on new employees or on third parties that we have
only recently established relationships with. Further discussion is set forth in the risk factor titled “Maintaining cybersecurity and data
security and complying with data privacy laws and regulations are important to our business and a breach of our cybersecurity or
data security or a violation of law could result in serious harm to our reputation and have a material adverse impact on our business
and financial results”.
Our business may be adversely affected if our reputation is harmed.
Our business is subject to significant reputational risks. If we fail, or appear to fail, to address various issues that may affect our
reputation, our business could be harmed. Issues could include real or perceived legal or regulatory violations or be the result of a
failure in governance, risk-management, technology, or operations. Similarly, market rumors and actual or perceived association with
counterparties whose own reputation is under question could harm our business. Lawsuits brought against us (or the resolution of
lawsuits brought against us), claims of employee misconduct, claims of wrongful termination, adverse publicity, conflicts of interest,
ethical issues, or failure to maintain the security of our information technology systems or to protect non-public personal information
could also cause significant reputational damage. Such reputational damage could result not only in an immediate financial loss, but
could also result in a loss of business relationships, the ability to raise capital, the ability to recruit and retain human resources, and the
ability to access liquidity through borrowing facilities.
Our financial results are determined and reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (and related
conventions and interpretations), or GAAP, and are based on estimates and assumptions made in accordance with those principles,
conventions, and interpretations. Furthermore, the amount of dividends we are required to distribute as a REIT is driven by the
determination of our income in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code rather than GAAP.
43
Our reported GAAP financial results differ from the taxable income results that drive our dividend distribution requirements and,
therefore, our GAAP results may not be an accurate indicator of taxable income and dividend distributions.
Generally, the cumulative income we report relating to an investment asset will be the same for GAAP and tax purposes, although the
timing of this recognition over the life of the asset could be materially different. There are, however, certain permanent differences in
the recognition of certain expenses under the respective accounting principles applied for GAAP and tax purposes and these
differences could be material. Thus, the amount of GAAP earnings reported in any given period may not be indicative of future
dividend distributions.
Our minimum dividend distribution requirements are determined under the REIT tax laws and are based on our REIT taxable income
as calculated for tax purposes pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. Our Board of Directors may also decide to distribute more
dividends than required based on these determinations. One should not expect that our retained GAAP earnings will equal cumulative
distributions, as the Board of Directors’ dividend distribution decisions, permanent differences in GAAP and tax accounting, and even
temporary differences may result in material differences in these balances.
Over time, accounting principles, conventions, rules, and interpretations change, which could affect our reported GAAP and taxable
earnings and stockholders’ equity.
Accounting rules for the various aspects of our business change from time to time. Changes in GAAP, or the accepted interpretation of
these accounting principles, can affect our reported income, earnings, and stockholders’ equity. In addition, changes in tax accounting
rules or the interpretations thereof could affect our taxable income and our dividend distribution requirements. Predicting and planning
for these changes can be difficult.
Risks Related to Redwood's Legislative and Regulatory Matters Affecting our Industry
Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could have an adverse impact on the U.S. housing market, mortgage finance markets,
and our business.
From time to time, U.S. federal, state, and local governments make substantive changes to income tax laws, rules and regulations
impacting the housing market, mortgage finance markets, and/or our business. For example, in 2018 the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,
among other things and subject to certain exceptions, reduced for individuals the annual residential mortgage-interest deduction for
purchase money mortgage debt, as well as eliminated for individuals the deduction for interest with respect to home equity
indebtedness. Changes such as these, or other unknown or unknowable future changes to income tax laws and regulations, could
adversely impact home prices, liquidity among mortgage borrowers, borrower delinquencies, market values of mortgages or mortgage-
backed securities, origination volumes or our volume of business activity, and other aspects of the markets within which we operate,
all of which could negatively impact our business and financial results.
State and/or local rent control or rent stabilization regulations may reduce the value of single-family rental or multifamily
properties collateralizing mortgage loans we own, or those underlying the securities or other investments we own. As a result, the
value of these types of mortgage loans, securities, and other investments may be negatively impacted, which impacts could be
material.
Numerous counties and municipalities, including those in which certain of the properties securing SFR and multifamily mortgage
loans we own, or those underlying the securities or other investments we own, are located, impose rent control or rent stabilization
rules on apartment buildings. These ordinances may limit rent increases to fixed percentages, to percentages of increases in the
consumer price index, to increases set or approved by a governmental agency, or to increases determined through mediation or binding
arbitration. In some jurisdictions, including, for example, New York City, many apartment buildings are subject to rent stabilization
and some units are subject to rent control. These regulations, among other things, may limit the ability of single-family rental and
multifamily property owners who have borrowed money (including in the form of mortgage debt) to finance their property or
properties to raise rents above specified percentages. Any limitations on a borrower’s ability to raise property rents may impair such
borrower’s ability to repair or renovate the mortgaged property, repay its mortgage loan or, in the case of a fixed cap on increases,
keep pace with a rise in inflation.
Some states, counties and municipalities have imposed or may impose in the future stricter rent control regulations. For example, in
2019, the New York State Senate passed the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (the “HSTP Act”), which, among
other things, limits the ability of landlords to increase rents in rent stabilized apartments in New York State at the time of lease
renewal and after a vacancy. The HSTP Act also limits potential rent increases for major capital improvements and for individual
apartment improvements in such rent stabilized apartments. In addition, the HSTP Act permits certain qualified localities in the State
44
of New York to implement the rent stabilization system. In addition, the California State Assembly passed Assembly Bill 1482 (“AB
1482”), which, among other things, will prevent landlords in California from increasing the gross rental rate by more than 5% plus the
percentage change in the cost of living in any 12-month period and require landlords to have “just cause” when evicting a tenant that
has continuously and lawfully occupied a residential property for 12 months. Such “just cause” may include, among other things, the
failure to pay rent, causing damage or destruction to the property, and assigning or subletting the premises in violation of the tenant’s
lease. In addition, the Oregon State House passed Senate Bill 608 (“SB 608”), which, among other things, will limit rent increases to
7% each year, in addition to inflation, and would, in most cases, require landlords to provide notice and give a reason for evicting
tenants. The HSTP Act, AB 1482 or SB 608 may reduce the value of the SFR and multifamily properties collateralizing mortgage
loans we own, or those underlying the securities or other investments we own, that are located in the States of New York, California or
Oregon, respectively, that are subject to the applicable rent control regulations. The value of SFR and multifamily mortgage loans,
securities, and other investments we own may be negatively impacted by rent control or rent stabilization laws, regulations, or
ordinances, which impacts may be material.
45
We may not be able to obtain or maintain the governmental licenses required to operate our business and we may fail to comply
with various state and federal laws and regulations applicable to our business of acquiring residential mortgage loans and
servicing rights and originating business purpose real estate loans. We are approved to service residential mortgage loans sold to
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and failure to maintain our status as an approved servicer could harm our business.
While we are not required to obtain licenses to purchase mortgage-backed securities, the purchase of residential and business purpose
mortgage loans in the secondary market, and the origination of business purpose loans, may, in some circumstances, require us to
maintain various state licenses. Acquiring the right to service residential mortgage loans and certain business purpose mortgage loans
may also, in some circumstances, require us to maintain various state licenses even though we currently do not expect to directly
engage in loan servicing ourselves. As a result, we could be delayed in conducting certain business if we were first required to obtain a
state license. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain or maintain all of the licenses we need or that we would not
experience significant delays in obtaining or maintaining these licenses. Furthermore, once licenses are issued we are required to
comply with various information reporting and other regulatory requirements to maintain those licenses, and there is no assurance that
we will be able to satisfy those requirements or other regulatory requirements applicable to our business of acquiring mortgage loans
on an ongoing basis. Our failure to obtain or maintain required licenses or our failure to comply with regulatory requirements that are
applicable to our business of acquiring or originating mortgage loans may restrict our business and investment options and could harm
our business and expose us to penalties or other claims.
For example, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB also has regulatory authority over certain aspects of our business as a result of our
residential mortgage banking activities, including, without limitation, authority to bring an enforcement action against us for failure to
comply with regulations promulgated by the CFPB that are applicable to our business. One of the CFPB’s areas of focus has been on
whether companies like Redwood take appropriate steps to ensure that business arrangements with service providers do not present
risks to consumers. The sub-servicers we retain to directly service residential mortgage loans (when we own the associated MSRs) are
among our most significant service providers with respect to our residential mortgage banking activities and our failure to take steps to
ensure that these sub-servicers are servicing these residential mortgage loans in accordance with applicable law and regulation could
result in enforcement action by the CFPB against us that could restrict our business, expose us to penalties or other claims, negatively
impact our financial results, and damage our reputation. Furthermore, failure of sub-servicers who service securitized loans could
result in the associated securitization entity being held liable for the sub-servicer’s actions, which could result in losses to us, including
as a result of a reduction in the value of mortgage securities issued by such entities that we hold as investments. Further discussion is
set forth in the risk factor titled “Through certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries we have engaged in the past, and expect to
continue to engage in, securitization transactions relating to real estate mortgage loans and HEIs. In addition, we have invested in
and continue to invest in mortgage-backed securities and other ABS issued in securitization transactions sponsored by other
companies. These types of transactions and investments expose us to potentially material risks”.
As another example, rules under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) that took effect in January 2018 impose expanded data
collection requirements and additional reporting obligations on mortgage lenders and purchasers of residential mortgage loans. The
expanded data collection requirements may result in a higher frequency of data errors, which in turn could be perceived by regulators
as an indication of inadequate controls and poor compliance processes, and could lead to monetary civil penalties. Additionally, the
availability of increased amounts of data may increase regulatory scrutiny of our mortgage loan purchasing patterns. In addition, the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and other Federal and state laws and regulations that apply to certain of our investment and business
activities, include consumer protections relating to discrimination, abusive and deceptive practices, and other consumer-related
matters. To the extent these laws and regulations apply to us, our failure to comply with them, even if not intentional, could give rise
to liabilities, fines, and remediation requirements, which could be material. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could
also result for incorrectly concluding that certain aspects of our investment and business activities are not subject to certain laws or
regulations.
In addition, we are a servicer approved to service residential mortgage loans sold to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. As an approved
servicer, we are required to conduct certain aspects of our operations in accordance with applicable policies and guidelines published
by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Failure to maintain our status as an approved servicer would mean we would not be able to service
mortgage loans for these entities, or could otherwise restrict our business and investment options and could harm our business and
expose us to losses or other claims.
46
With respect to mortgage loans we own, or which we have purchased and subsequently sold, we may be subject to liability for
potential violations of the CFPB’s TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure rule (also referred to as “TRID”) or other similar
consumer protection laws and regulations, which could adversely impact our business and financial results.
Federal consumer protection laws and regulations have been enacted and promulgated that are designed to regulate residential
mortgage loan underwriting and originators’ lending processes, standards, and disclosures to borrowers. These laws and regulations
include the CFPB’s “TRID”, “ability-to-repay” and “qualified mortgage” regulations. In addition, there are various other federal, state,
and local laws and regulations that are intended to discourage predatory lending practices by residential mortgage loan originators. For
example, the federal Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 (HOEPA) prohibits inclusion of certain provisions in
residential mortgage loans that have mortgage rates or origination costs in excess of prescribed levels and requires that borrowers be
given certain disclosures prior to origination. Some states have enacted, or may enact, similar laws or regulations, which in some cases
may impose restrictions and requirements greater than those in place under federal laws and regulations. In addition, under the anti-
predatory lending laws of some states, the origination of certain residential mortgage loans, including loans that are classified as “high
cost” loans under applicable law, must satisfy a net tangible benefits test with respect to the borrower. This test, as well as certain
standards set forth in the “ability-to-repay” and “qualified mortgage” regulations, may be highly subjective and open to interpretation.
In particular, the CFPB's "qualified mortgage" regulations are in a transition phase that began on March 1, 2021 and is scheduled to
end on October 1, 2022, during which both the current regulations and updated "qualified mortgage" regulations will be in effect,
which may introduce interpretive and implementation questions and challenges. As a result, a court may determine that a residential
mortgage loan did not meet the standard or test even if the originator reasonably believed such standard or test had been satisfied.
Failure of residential mortgage loan originators or servicers to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us, as an assignee
or purchaser of these loans (or as an investor in securities backed by these loans), to monetary penalties and defenses to foreclosure,
including by recoupment or setoff of finance charges and fees collected, and could result in rescission of the affected residential
mortgage loans, which could adversely impact our business and financial results. Moreover, the CFPB has announced that, with
respect to the “qualified mortgage” regulations, they may continue to analyze the updated regulations and revisit whether additional
updates should be made to these regulations, further introducing uncertainty around these regulations, which could negatively impact
our residential mortgage banking business.
Environmental protection laws that apply to properties that secure or underlie our loan and investment portfolio could result in
losses to us. We may also be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to properties of which we become direct or indirect
owners or to which we take title, which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Under the laws of several states, contamination of a property may give rise to a lien on the property to secure recovery of the cleanup
costs. In certain of these states, such a lien has priority over the lien of an existing mortgage against the property, which could impair
the value of an investment in a security we own backed by such a property or could reduce the value of such a property that underlies
loans we have made or own. In addition, under the laws of some states and under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, we may be liable for costs of addressing releases or threatened releases of hazardous
substances that require remedy at a property securing or underlying a loan we hold if our agents or employees have become
sufficiently involved in the hazardous waste aspects of the operations of the borrower of that loan, regardless of whether or not the
environmental damage or threat was caused by us or the borrower.
In the course of our business, we may take title to real estate or otherwise become direct or indirect owners of real estate, including in
the event of foreclosure on mortgage loans and through our participation in an investment fund to acquire workforce housing
properties. If we do take title, and when we are a direct or indirect owner, we could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect
to the property, including liability to a governmental entity or third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation, and
clean-up costs. In addition, we may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a
property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. If we ever become subject to
significant environmental liabilities, our business and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
47
Risks Related to Redwood's Capital, REIT and Legal/Organizational Structure
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and, as such, are required to meet certain tests in order to maintain our REIT status. This
adds complexity and costs to running our business and exposes us to additional risks.
Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our net income and dividend distributions and could adversely affect the value of
our common stock.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for all tax years since 1994. However, many of the
requirements for qualification as a REIT are highly technical and complex and require an analysis of particular facts and an application
of the legal requirements to those facts in situations where there is only limited judicial and administrative guidance. Thus, we cannot
assure you that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or a court would agree with our conclusion that we have qualified as a REIT
historically, or that changes to our investments or business or the law will not cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT in the future.
Furthermore, in an environment where assets may quickly change in value, previous planning for compliance with REIT qualification
rules may be disrupted. If we failed to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and did not meet the requirements for
statutory relief, we would be subject to federal corporate income tax on our taxable income, and we would not be allowed a deduction
for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income. In such a case, we may need to borrow money or sell assets in order
to pay the taxes due, even if the market conditions are not favorable for such sales or borrowings. In addition, unless we are entitled to
relief under applicable statutory provisions, we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years thereafter. Failure to qualify as a
REIT could adversely affect our dividend distributions and could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Maintaining REIT status and avoiding the generation of excess inclusion income at Redwood Trust, Inc. and certain of our
subsidiaries may reduce our flexibility and could limit our ability to pursue certain opportunities. Failure to appropriately structure
our business and transactions to comply with laws and regulations applicable to REITs could have adverse consequences.
To maintain REIT status, we must follow certain rules and meet certain tests. In doing so, our flexibility to manage our operations may
be reduced. For instance:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Compliance with the REIT income and asset rules, or uncertainty about the application of those rules to certain investments,
may result in our holding investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries (where any income they produce is subject to
corporate-level taxation) when we would prefer to hold those investments in an entity that is taxed as a REIT (where they
generally would not be subject to corporate-level taxation).
Compliance with the REIT income and asset rules may limit the type or extent of financing or hedging that we can
undertake.
Our ability to own non-real estate assets and earn non-real estate related income is limited, and the rules for classifying
assets and income are complicated. Our ability to own equity interests in other entities is also limited. If we fail to comply
with these limits, we may be forced to liquidate attractive investments on short notice on unfavorable terms in order to
maintain our REIT status.
We generally use taxable REIT subsidiaries to own non-real estate assets and engage in activities that may give rise to non-
real estate related income under the REIT rules. However, our ability to invest in taxable REIT subsidiaries is limited under
the REIT rules. No more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more taxable
REIT subsidiaries. Maintaining compliance with this limit could require us to constrain the growth of our taxable REIT
subsidiaries (and the business and investing activities they conduct) in the future.
Meeting minimum REIT dividend distribution requirements could reduce our liquidity. We may earn non-cash REIT
taxable income due to timing and/or character mismatches between the computation of our income for tax and accounting
purposes. Earning non-cash REIT taxable income could necessitate our selling assets, incurring debt, or raising new equity
in order to fund dividend distributions.
We could be viewed as a “dealer” with respect to certain transactions and become subject to a 100% prohibited transaction
tax or other entity-level taxes on income from such transactions.
Furthermore, the rules we must follow and the tests we must satisfy to maintain our REIT status may change, or the interpretation of
these rules and tests by the IRS may change.
48
In addition, our stated goal has been to not generate excess inclusion income at Redwood Trust, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries that
would be taxable as unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) to our tax-exempt shareholders. Achieving this goal has limited, and
may continue to limit, our flexibility in pursuing certain transactions or has resulted in, and may continue to result in, our having to
pursue certain transactions through a taxable REIT subsidiary, which would reduce the net returns on these transactions by the
associated tax liabilities payable by such subsidiary. Despite our efforts to do so, we may not be able to avoid creating or distributing
UBTI to our shareholders.
To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions, and the unavailability of such
capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, may cause us to curtail our investment activities and/or to dispose of assets
at inopportune times, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and per share trading price
of our common stock.
To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year (excluding
any net capital gains), and we will be subject to regular corporate income taxes to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our
REIT taxable income each year. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which
distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our net capital gains, and 100%
of our undistributed income from prior years. To maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes,
we may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT distribution requirements, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not
favorable for these borrowings. These borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of income
and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes. For example, we may be required to accrue interest and discount income on
mortgage loans, MBS, and other types of debt securities or interests in debt securities before we receive any payments of interest or
principal on such assets. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of factors, including the market’s perception
of our growth potential, our current debt levels, the market price of our common stock, and our current and potential future earnings.
We cannot assure you that we will have access to such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, which may cause us to
curtail our investment activities and/or to dispose of assets at inopportune times, and could adversely affect our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flow and per share trading price of our common stock.
Dividends payable by REITs, including us, generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for qualified dividends paid by domestic non-REIT corporations to U.S. stockholders that
are individuals, trust or estates is generally 20%. Although dividends paid by REITs to such stockholders are generally not eligible for
that rate (subject to limited exceptions), such stockholders may deduct up to 20% of ordinary dividends from a REIT for taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2026. Although this deduction reduces the effective tax rate applicable to certain dividends paid by
REITs, such tax rate is still higher than the tax rate applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends. This may cause investors to
view REIT investments as less attractive than investments in non-REIT corporations, which in turn may adversely affect the value of
shares of REITs, including the shares of our common stock.
The failure of mortgage loans or MBS subject to a repurchase agreement or a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset would
adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
When we enter into short-term financing arrangements in the form of repurchase agreements, we will sell certain of our assets to a
counterparty and simultaneously enter into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that we will be treated for U.S.
federal income tax purposes as the owner of the assets that are the subject of any such agreements notwithstanding that such
agreements may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however,
that the IRS could assert that we did not own the assets during the term of the repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to
qualify as a REIT.
In addition, we have and may continue to acquire mezzanine loans. Mezzanine loans are loans secured by equity interests in a
partnership or limited liability company that directly or indirectly owns real estate. In Revenue Procedure 2003-65, the IRS provided a
safe harbor pursuant to which a mezzanine loan, if it meets each of the requirements contained in the Revenue Procedure, will be
treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be
treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a
safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We believe that the mezzanine loans that
we have treated as real estate assets generally met all of the requirements for reliance on this safe harbor. However, there can be no
assurance that the IRS will not challenge the tax treatment of these mezzanine loans, and if such a challenge were sustained, we could
in certain circumstances be required to pay a penalty tax or fail to qualify as a REIT.
49
Changes in tax rules could adversely affect REITs and could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
The rules addressing federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS
and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Any future changes in the regulations or tax laws applicable to REITs or to mortgage related
financial products could negatively impact our operations or reduce any competitive advantages we may have relative to non-REIT
entities, either of which could reduce the value of our common stock.
The application of the tax laws to our business is complicated, and we may not interpret and apply some of the rules and regulations
correctly. In addition, we may not make all available elections, which could result in our not being able to fully benefit from available
deductions or benefits. Furthermore, the elections, interpretations and applications we do make could be deemed by the IRS to be
incorrect and could have adverse impacts on our GAAP earnings and potentially on our REIT status.
The Internal Revenue Code may change and/or the interpretation of the rules and regulations by the IRS may change. In circumstances
where the application of these rules and regulations affecting our business is not clear, we may have to interpret them and their
application to us. We seek the advice of outside tax advisors in arriving at these interpretations, but our interpretations may prove to be
wrong, which could have adverse consequences.
Our tax payments and dividend distributions, which are intended to meet the REIT distribution requirements, are based in large part on
our estimate of taxable income which includes the application and interpretation of a variety of tax rules and regulations. While there
are some relief provisions should we incorrectly interpret certain rules and regulations, we may not be able to fully take advantage of
these provisions, and this could have an adverse effect on our REIT status. In addition, our GAAP earnings include tax provisions and
benefits based on our estimates of taxable income and should our estimates prove to be wrong, we could have to make an adjustment
to our tax provisions and this adjustment could be material.
Our decisions about raising, managing, and distributing our capital may adversely affect our business and financial results.
Furthermore, our growth may be limited if we are not able to raise additional capital.
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income as dividends to shareholders. Thus, we do not generally have
the ability to retain all of the earnings generated by our REIT and, to a large extent, we rely on our ability to raise capital to grow. We
may raise capital through the issuance of new shares of our common stock, either through our direct stock purchase and dividend
reinvestment plan or through public or private offerings. We may also raise capital by issuing other types of securities, such as
preferred stock, convertible or exchangeable debt, or other types of debt securities. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately
275 million unissued shares of stock authorized for issuance under our charter (although approximately 55 million of these shares are
reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans, dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan, ATM offering program,
and outstanding convertible notes and exchangeable notes). The number of our unissued shares of stock authorized for issuance
establishes a limit on the amount of capital we can raise through issuances of shares of stock or securities convertible into, or
exchangeable for, shares of stock, unless we seek and receive approval from our shareholders to increase the authorized number of our
shares in our charter. Also, certain stock change of ownership tests may limit our ability to raise significant amounts of equity capital
or could limit our future use of tax losses to offset income tax obligations if we raise significant amounts of equity capital.
In addition, we may not be able to raise capital at times when we need capital or see opportunities to invest capital. Many of the same
factors that could make the pricing for investments in real estate loans and securities attractive, such as the availability of assets from
distressed owners who need to liquidate them at reduced prices, and uncertainty about credit risk, housing, and the economy, may limit
investors’ and lenders’ willingness to provide us with additional capital on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. There may be other
reasons we are not able to raise capital and, as a result, may not be able to finance growth in our business and in our portfolio of assets.
If we are unable to raise capital and expand our business and our portfolio of investments, our growth may be limited, we may have to
forgo attractive business and investment opportunities, and our general and administrative expenses may increase significantly relative
to our capital base. Alternatively, we may need to raise capital on unfavorable terms, which may lead to greater dilution of existing
shareholders, higher interest costs, or higher transaction costs.
To the extent we have capital that is available for investment, we have broad discretion over how to invest that capital and our
shareholders and other investors will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding its use. To the extent we invest capital
in our business or in portfolio assets, we may not be successful in achieving favorable returns.
50
Conducting our business in a manner so that we are exempt from registration under, and in compliance with, the Investment
Company Act may reduce our flexibility and could limit our ability to pursue certain opportunities. At the same time, failure to
continue to qualify for exemption from the Investment Company Act could adversely affect us.
Under the Investment Company Act, an investment company is required to register with the SEC and is subject to extensive restrictive
and potentially adverse regulations relating to, among other things, operating methods, management, capital structure, dividends, and
transactions with affiliates. However, companies primarily engaged in the business of acquiring mortgages and other liens on and
interests in real estate are generally exempt from the requirements of the Investment Company Act. We believe that we have
conducted our business so that we are not subject to the registration requirements of the Investment Company Act. In order to continue
to do so, however, Redwood and each of our subsidiaries must either operate so as to fall outside the definition of an investment
company under the Investment Company Act or satisfy its own exclusion under the Investment Company Act. For example, to avoid
being defined as an investment company, an entity may limit its ownership or holdings of investment securities to less than 40% of its
total assets. In order to satisfy an exclusion from being defined as an investment company, other entities, among other things, maintain
at least 55% of their assets in certain qualifying real estate assets (the 55% Requirement) and also maintain an additional 25% of their
assets in such qualifying real estate assets or certain other types of real estate-related assets (the 25% Requirement). Rapid changes in
the values of assets we own, however, can disrupt prior efforts to conduct our business to meet these requirements.
If Redwood or one of our subsidiaries fell within the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act and
failed to qualify for an exclusion or exemption, including, for example, if it was required to and failed to meet the 55% Requirement or
the 25% Requirement, it could, among other things, be required either (i) to change the manner in which it conducts operations to
avoid being required to register as an investment company or (ii) to register as an investment company, either of which could
adversely affect us by, among other things, requiring us to dispose of certain assets or to change the structure of our business in ways
that we may not believe to be in our best interests. Legislative or regulatory changes relating to the Investment Company Act or which
affect our efforts to qualify for exclusions or exemptions, including our ability to comply with the 55% Requirement and the 25%
Requirement, could also result in these adverse effects on us.
If we were deemed an unregistered investment company, we could be subject to monetary penalties and injunctive relief and we could
be unable to enforce contracts with third parties and third parties could seek to obtain rescission of transactions undertaken during the
period we were deemed an unregistered investment company, unless the court found that under the circumstances, enforcement (or
denial of rescission) would produce a more equitable result than no enforcement (or grant of rescission) and would not be inconsistent
with the Investment Company Act.
Provisions in our charter and bylaws and provisions of Maryland law may limit a change in control or deter a takeover that might
otherwise result in a premium price being paid to our shareholders for their shares in Redwood.
In order to maintain our status as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, actually or
constructively, by five or fewer individuals (defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities). In order to protect us
against the risk of losing our status as a REIT due to concentration of ownership among our shareholders and for other reasons, our
charter generally prohibits any single shareholder, or any group of affiliated shareholders, from beneficially owning more than 9.8% of
the outstanding shares of any class of our stock, unless our Board of Directors waives or modifies this ownership limit. This limitation
may have the effect of precluding an acquisition of control of us by a third party without the consent of our Board of Directors. Our
Board of Directors has granted a limited number of waivers to institutional investors to own shares in excess of this 9.8% limit, which
waivers are subject to certain terms and conditions. Our Board of Directors may amend these existing waivers to permit additional
share ownership or may grant waivers to additional shareholders at any time.
Certain other provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and in the Maryland General Corporation Law (“MGCL”) may have the
effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us and may therefore inhibit a change in control. For
example, our charter includes provisions granting our Board of Directors the authority to issue preferred stock from time to time and to
establish the terms, preferences, and rights of the preferred stock without the approval of our shareholders. Provisions in our charter
and the MGCL also restrict our shareholders’ ability to remove directors and fill vacancies on our Board of Directors and restrict
unsolicited share acquisitions. These provisions and others may deter offers to acquire our stock or large blocks of our stock upon
terms attractive to our shareholders, thereby limiting the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares over then-
prevailing market prices.
The ability to take action against our directors and officers is limited by our charter and bylaws and provisions of Maryland law
and we may (or, in some cases, are obligated to) indemnify our current and former directors and officers against certain losses
relating to their service to us.
51
Our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and to shareholders for pecuniary damages to the fullest extent
permitted by Maryland law. In addition, our charter and bylaws can require us to indemnify our officers and directors (and those of
our subsidiaries and affiliates) to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she
is made, or threatened to be made, a party because of his or her service to us. In addition, we have entered into, and may in the future
enter into, indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers and the directors and certain of the officers of
certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates which obligate us to indemnify them against certain losses relating to their service to us and
the related costs of defense.
Other Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Investing in our common stock may involve a high degree of risk. Investors in our common stock may experience losses, volatility,
and poor liquidity, and we may reduce our dividends in a variety of circumstances.
An investment in our common stock may involve a high degree of risk, particularly when compared to other types of investments.
Risks related to the economy, the financial markets, our industry, our investing activity, our other business activities, our financial
results, the amount of dividends we distribute, the manner in which we conduct our business, and the way we have structured our
operations could result in a reduction in, or the elimination of, the value of our common stock. The level of risk associated with an
investment in our common stock may not be suitable for the risk tolerance of many investors. Investors may experience volatile
returns and material losses. In addition, the trading volume of our common stock (i.e., its liquidity) may be insufficient to allow
investors to sell their common stock when they want to or at a price they consider reasonable.
Our earnings, cash flows, book value, and dividends can be volatile and difficult to predict. Investors in our common stock should not
rely on our estimates, projections, or predictions, or on management’s beliefs about future events. In particular, the sustainability of
our earnings and our cash flows will depend on numerous factors, including our level of business and investment activity, our access
to debt and equity financing, the returns we earn, the amount and timing of credit losses, prepayments, the expense of running our
business, and other factors, including the risk factors described herein. As a consequence, although we seek to pay a regular common
stock dividend that is sustainable, we may reduce our regular dividend rate, or stop paying dividends, in the future for a variety of
reasons. We may not provide public warnings of dividend reductions prior to their occurrence. Although we have paid special
dividends in the past, we have not paid a special dividend since 2007 and we may not do so in the future. Changes to the amount of
dividends we distribute may result in a reduction in the value of our common stock.
A limited number of institutional shareholders own a significant percentage of our common stock, which could have adverse
consequences to other holders of our common stock.
As of February 21, 2022, based on filings of Schedules 13D and 13G with the SEC, we believe that three institutional shareholders
each owned approximately 5% or more of our outstanding common stock (and we believe one of these shareholders owned
approximately 17.7% of our outstanding common stock) and we believe based on data obtained from other public sources that,
overall, institutional shareholders owned, in the aggregate, more than 70% of our outstanding common stock. Furthermore, one or
more of these investors or other investors could significantly increase their ownership of our common stock, including through the
conversion of outstanding convertible or exchangeable notes into shares of common stock. Significant ownership stakes held by these
individual institutions or other investors could have adverse consequences for other shareholders because each of these shareholders
will have a significant influence over the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, including the election of our
directors and transactions involving a change in control. In addition, should any of these significant shareholders determine to
liquidate all or a significant portion of their holdings of our common stock or, to the extent our common stock is included in an
industry or other broad-based market index and ceases to be so included, it could have an adverse effect on the market price of our
common stock.
Although, under our charter, shareholders are generally precluded from beneficially owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding
common stock, our Board of Directors may amend existing ownership-limitation waivers or grant waivers to other shareholders in the
future, in each case in a manner which may allow for increases in the concentration of the ownership of our common stock held by one
or more shareholders.
Future sales of our common stock by us or by our officers and directors may have adverse consequences for investors.
We may issue additional shares of common stock, or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of common stock, in
public offerings or private placements (including, for example, as consideration in an acquisition transaction), and holders of our
outstanding convertible notes or exchangeable securities may convert those securities into shares of common stock. In addition, we
may issue additional shares of common stock to participants in our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan and to our
directors, officers, and employees under our employee stock purchase plan, our incentive plan, or other similar plans, including upon
52
the exercise of, or in respect of, distributions on equity awards previously granted thereunder. We are not required to offer any such
shares to existing shareholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, it may not be possible for existing shareholders to participate in
future share issuances, which may dilute existing shareholders’ interests in us. In addition, if market participants buy shares of
common stock, or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of common stock, in issuances by us in the future, it may
reduce or eliminate any purchases of our common stock they might otherwise make in the open market, which in turn could have the
effect of reducing the volume of shares of our common stock traded in the marketplace, which could have the effect of reducing the
market price and liquidity of our common stock.
At December 31, 2021, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 2% of our common
stock. Sales of shares of our common stock by these individuals are generally required to be publicly reported and are tracked by many
market participants as a factor in making their own investment decisions. As a result, future sales by these individuals could negatively
affect the market price of our common stock.
Dividend distributions on our common stock may not be declared or paid or dividends may decrease over time. Dividends may be
paid in shares of common stock, cash or a combination of shares of common stock and cash. Changes in the amount and timing of
dividend distributions we pay or in the tax characterization of dividend distributions we pay may adversely affect the market price
of our common stock or may result in holders of our common stock being taxed on dividend distributions at a higher rate than
initially expected.
Our dividend distributions are driven by a variety of factors, including our minimum dividend distribution requirements under the
REIT tax laws and our REIT taxable income as calculated pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. We are generally required to
distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, although our reported financial results for GAAP purposes
may differ materially from our REIT taxable income.
In the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid $92 million of cash dividends on our common stock, representing cumulative dividends
of $0.78 per share. Our ability to continue to pay quarterly dividends in the future may be adversely affected by a number of factors,
including the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. Further, we may
consider paying future dividends, if at all, in shares of common stock, cash, or a combination of shares of common stock and cash.
Any decision regarding the composition of such dividends would be made following an analysis and review of our liquidity, including
our cash balances and cash flows, at the time of payment of the dividend. For example, we may determine to distribute shares of
common stock in lieu of cash, or in combination with cash, in respect of our dividend obligations, which, among other things, could
result in dilution to existing stockholders.
To the extent we determine that future dividends would represent a return of capital to investors or would not be required under
applicable REIT tax laws and regulations, rather than the distribution of income, we may determine to discontinue dividend payments
until such time that dividends would again represent a distribution of income or be required under applicable REIT tax laws and
regulations. Any reduction or elimination of our payment of dividend distributions would not only reduce the amount of dividends you
would receive as a holder of our common stock, but could also have the effect of reducing the market price of our common stock and
our ability to raise capital in future securities offerings.
In addition, the rate at which holders of our common stock are taxed on dividends we pay and the characterization of our dividend —
be it ordinary income, qualified dividends, long-term capital gains, or a return of capital — could have an impact on the market price
of our common stock. After we announce the expected characterization of dividend distributions we have paid, the actual
characterization (and, therefore, the rate at which holders of our common stock are taxed on the dividend distributions they have
received) could vary from our expectations, including due to errors, changes made in the course of preparing our corporate tax returns,
or changes made in response to an audit by the IRS, with the result that holders of our common stock could incur greater income tax
liabilities than expected.
We may pay taxable dividends in our common stock and cash, in which case stockholders may sell shares of our common stock to
pay tax on such dividends, placing downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.
We may satisfy the REIT 90% distribution test with taxable distributions of our common stock. The IRS has issued Revenue
Procedure 2017-45 authorizing elective cash/stock dividends to be made by “publicly offered REITs.” Pursuant to Revenue Procedure
2017-45, as modified by Revenue Procedure 2021-53, the IRS will treat the distribution of stock pursuant to an elective cash/stock
dividend as a distribution of property under Section 301 of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., a dividend), as long as at least 20% of the
total dividend (or 10% for dividends declared after November 1, 2021 and before June 30, 2022) is available in cash and certain other
parameters detailed in the Revenue Procedure are satisfied.
53
If we make a taxable dividend payable in cash and common stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to
include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay income tax with respect to such
dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order
to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the
market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be
required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend
that is payable in common stock. If we make a taxable dividend payable in cash and our common stock and a significant number of
our stockholders determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure
on the trading price of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock could be negatively affected by various factors, including broad market fluctuations.
The market price of our common stock may be negatively affected by various factors, which change from time to time. Some of these
factors are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Our actual or anticipated financial condition, performance, and prospects and those of our competitors.
The market for similar securities issued by other REITs and other competitors of ours.
Changes in the manner that investors and securities analysts who provide research to the marketplace on us analyze the
value of our common stock.
Changes in recommendations or in estimated financial results published by securities analysts who provide research to the
marketplace on us, our competitors, or our industry.
General economic and financial market conditions, including, among other things, actual and projected interest rates,
prepayments, and credit performance and the markets for the types of assets we hold or invest in.
Proposals to significantly change the manner in which financial markets, financial institutions, and related industries, or
financial products are regulated under applicable law, or the enactment of such proposals into law or regulation.
Other events or circumstances which undermine confidence in the financial markets or otherwise have a broad impact on
financial markets, such as the sudden instability or collapse of large financial institutions or other significant corporations
(whether due to fraud or other factors), terrorist attacks, warfare (including the recent outbreak of hostilities between Russia
and Ukraine), natural or man-made disasters, the outbreak of pandemic or epidemic disease, or threatened or actual armed
Furthermore, these fluctuations do not always relate directly to the financial performance of the companies whose stock prices may be
affected. As a result of these and other factors, investors who own our common stock could experience a decrease in the value of their
investment, including decreases unrelated to our financial results or prospects.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
54
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive and administrative office is located in Mill Valley, California and we have additional offices, including at
the locations listed below. We do not own any properties and lease the space we utilize for our offices. Additional information on our
leases is included in Note 16 to the Financial Statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table presents the
locations and remaining lease terms of our primary offices.
Executive and Administrative Office Locations and Lease Expirations
Location
One Belvedere Place, Suite 300
Mill Valley, CA 94941
8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 425
Englewood, CO 80112
4 Park Plaza, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614
650 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2120
New York, NY 10019
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Lease
Expiration
2028
2031
2027
2025
For information on our legal proceedings, see Note 16 to the Financial Statements within this Annual Report on Form 10-K under
the heading "Loss Contingencies - Litigation, Claims and Demands."
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
55
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol RWT. At February 21, 2022, our common stock was held
by approximately 556 holders of record and the total number of beneficial stockholders holding stock through depository companies
was approximately 44,850. At February 21, 2022, there were 120,169,045 shares of common stock outstanding.
The cash dividends declared on our common stock for each full quarterly period during 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
Total
Common Dividends Declared
Record
Date
Payable
Date
Per
Share
Dividend
Type
12/17/2021
9/23/2021
6/23/2021
3/24/2021
12/28/2021
9/30/2021
6/30/2021
3/31/2021
12/17/2020
9/22/2020
6/22/2020
3/16/2020
12/29/2020
9/29/2020
6/29/2020
3/30/2020
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.23
0.21
0.18
0.16
0.78
0.14
0.14
0.125
0.32
0.725
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
All dividend distributions are made with the authorization of the board of directors at its discretion and will depend on such items
as our GAAP net income, REIT taxable income, financial condition, maintenance of REIT status, and other factors that the board of
directors may deem relevant from time to time. The holders of our common stock share proportionally on a per share basis in all
declared dividends on common stock. As reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K on January 27, 2022, for dividend distributions
made in 2021, we expect our dividends paid in 2021 to be characterized as 74% ordinary income and 26% qualified dividends. None
of the dividend distributions made in 2021 are expected to be characterized for federal income tax purposes as a return of capital or
long-term capital gain dividends.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. In February 2018, our Board of Directors approved an authorization for the repurchase of our common stock,
increasing the total amount authorized for repurchases of common stock to $100 million, and also authorized the repurchase of
outstanding debt securities, including convertible and exchangeable debt. This authorization increased the previous share repurchase
authorization approved in February 2016 and has no expiration date. This repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any
specific number of shares or securities. Under this authorization, shares or securities may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or
open market transactions, including under plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 3,047,335 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization for
$22 million. At December 31, 2021, $78 million of this current total authorization remained available for repurchases of shares of our
common stock.
56
The following table contains information on the shares of our common stock that we purchased or otherwise acquired during the
three months ended December 31, 2021.
(In Thousands, except Per Share Data)
October 1, 2021 - October 31, 2021
November 1, 2021 - November 30, 2021
December 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
Total
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased or
Acquired
Average
Price per
Share Paid
— (1) $
$
—
—
—
$
$
12.89
—
—
12.89
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
Maximum Number
(or approximate
dollar value) of
Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
under the Plans or
Programs
— $
— $
— $
— $
—
—
78,369
78,369
(1) Represents fewer than 1,000 shares reacquired to satisfy tax withholding requirements related to the vesting of restricted shares.
Information with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the registrant are authorized for issuance is set
forth in Part II, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
57
Performance Graph
The following graph presents a cumulative total return comparison of our common stock, over the last five years, to the S&P
Composite-500 Stock Index and the FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REIT index. The total returns reflect stock price appreciation and the
reinvestment of dividends for our common stock and for each of the comparative indices, assuming that $100 was invested in each on
December 31, 2016. The information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable; but neither its accuracy nor its
completeness is guaranteed. The total return performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance of
our common stock.
Redwood Trust, Inc.
FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REIT Index
S&P Composite-500 Index
2016
100
100
100
2017
104
120
122
2018
114
117
116
2019
135
141
153
2020
77
115
181
2021
124
133
233
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]
58
Index ValueFive Year - Cumulative Total Return ComparisonDecember 31, 2016 through December 31, 2021RWTNAREITS&P 500201620172018201920202021050100150200250 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
INTRODUCTION
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide a
reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of
operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in six main sections:
•
•
•
•
•
Overview
Results of Operations
– Consolidated Results of Operations
– Results of Operations by Segment
–
Income Taxes
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Critical Accounting Estimates
Market and Other risks
Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Part II,
Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. References herein to “Redwood,” the
“company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” include Redwood Trust, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise
requires. The discussion in this MD&A contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, such as those
discussed in the Cautionary Statement in Part I, Item 1, Business and in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a specialty finance company focused on several distinct areas of housing
credit. Our operating platforms occupy a unique position in the housing finance value chain, providing liquidity to growing segments
of the U.S. housing market not well served by government programs. We deliver customized housing credit investments to a diverse
mix of investors through our best-in-class securitization platforms, whole-loan distribution activities and our publicly-traded securities.
Our aggregation, origination and investment activities have evolved to incorporate a diverse mix of residential, business purpose and
multifamily assets. Our goal is to provide attractive returns to shareholders through a stable and growing stream of earnings and
dividends, capital appreciation, and a commitment to technological innovation that facilitates risk-minded scale. We operate our
business in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking, and Investment Portfolio.
Redwood Trust, Inc. has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). We generally refer, collectively, to
Redwood Trust, Inc. and those of its subsidiaries that are not subject to subsidiary-level corporate income tax as “the REIT” or “our
REIT.” We generally refer to subsidiaries of Redwood Trust, Inc. that are subject to subsidiary-level corporate income tax as “our
taxable REIT subsidiaries” or “TRS.”
For a full description of our segments, see Part I, Item 1—Business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
59
Business Update
The fourth quarter of 2021 completed a transformative year for our Company. During 2021, our operating platforms continued to
profitably scale, and we executed on our capital deployment goals while advancing key strategic objectives in technology and in our
mortgage banking activities. For fiscal year 2021, we produced a 25% return on equity, delivered four consecutive quarterly dividend
increases, generated an annual total shareholder return ("TSR") of over 60%, and recorded a 22% increase in book value year-over-
year. Going forward, we believe the diversity of our revenue streams, notably the resiliency they have shown in the past during periods
of rising interest rates, positions us well to navigate current market conditions.
As we ended 2021 and entered 2022, the interest rate environment has quickly become challenging for mortgage companies. The
economy continues to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation has reached a 40-year high, and the Federal Reserve has
signaled its expectation to react with an aggressive response to tighten monetary policy. Higher interest rates are already reflected in
benchmark yields that recently reached their highest levels since 2019. Moreover, the global economic outlook has been clouded by
tensions and hostility between Russia and Ukraine, introducing additional uncertainty into financial markets.
As a housing finance company, we confront many of the same challenges as other market participants, but important differences
underpin our business opportunities. We believe Redwood’s business model is not as dependent as others on low interest rates,
quantitative easing, or market expectations of strong economic growth. For example, during the last cycle of rising interest rates that
began in late 2015, Redwood's book value increased as long-term interest rates rose and inflation expectations fell. We believe our
model has evolved even further since that time to include revenue streams less correlated with the direction of changing benchmark
interest rates.
A key example of this strategic evolution has been our expansion into business purpose lending (“BPL”), which began in 2018
and allowed us to access a growing cohort of investors seeking to refurbish antiquated housing stock for resale or rent. Our Business
Purpose Mortgage Banking business serves large and growing markets not fully addressed by government lending programs, and as
such is positioned to generate recurring revenue streams. Our BPL business has provided balance and depth to our mortgage banking
platform across a variety of interest rate and credit scenarios.
Our BPL platform funded over $700 million of loans during the fourth quarter of 2021, including over $340 million in December
2021, contributing to overall funding of $2.3 billion for the full year, significant milestones for the platform. Having recently
completed $15 billion in loan closings since its inception, CoreVest continues to scale while serving borrowers efficiently. Our BPL
platform also continues to broaden its distribution capabilities, including by selling approximately $200 million of single-family rental
loans to a large institutional buyer during the fourth quarter of 2021.
Our CoreVest BPL platform enters 2022 with a significant pipeline of activity and a strong outlook. Consistent growth in demand
for single-family rentals continues to attract increased equity capital to this market, a trend we expect to continue even as interest rates
rise. Business purpose loans generally feature either a floating interest rate for the duration of the loan, or sometimes a fixed rate that
is determined shortly prior to funding, mitigating the interest rate exposure market participants incur in managing a traditional
residential mortgage pipeline. We have recently experienced an increase in demand for financing from CoreVest’s borrower base,
evidenced by higher origination volumes across all lending products, particularly in the build-for-rent and multifamily sectors. We
also see opportunities to enhance our direct origination capabilities through third-party loan acquisition channels, the expansion of our
new residential transition loan ("RTL") securitization platform, and opportunities to further scale our platform through partnerships or
additional acquisitions.
Our Investment Portfolio deployed $222 million of capital into investments in the fourth quarter of 2021, the most in a single
quarter since the pandemic began. This included $135 million in third-party investments, demonstrating our ability to capitalize on
challenging market conditions. Our purchases included agency credit risk transfer ("CRT") securities as well as home equity
investments (“HEI”), following our securitization of HEI in the third quarter of 2021. We also continued to call securities backed by
seasoned jumbo and single-family rental loans at attractive prices, which provides us a future opportunity to sell or re-securitize the
underlying loans. Despite moderately slowing prepayment speeds, our near- to medium-term outlook for call activity remains
heightened given the strong housing market. Market conditions to date in the first quarter of 2022 are negatively impacting the value
of many of our current portfolio assets; however, at the same time they are creating favorable market conditions to deploy our
available capital, and we continue to find ways to raise additional capital accretively through innovative distribution channels and
efficient capital management programs. Our approach has allowed us to remain opportunistic while funding near-term capital needs
for our operating and investing platforms.
60
Our Residential mortgage banking platform encountered challenging market conditions in the fourth quarter of 2021 while still
managing strong performance relative to peer companies. These challenging conditions have continued into the first quarter of 2022.
We took a conservative risk management approach late in 2021, maintaining gain on sale margins at the higher end of our historical
range of 75 - 100 basis points on lower loan acquisition volumes, as large loan inventories across the industry pressured loan pricing
and margins. We issued three Sequoia securitizations with a combined $1.3 billion principal amount of residential loans in the fourth
quarter of 2021. Notably, two of the three securitizations were placed with investors without relying on a traditional marketing
process, providing us greater certainty with respect to loan sale margins. We also incorporated new ESG-related metrics into our
securitization disclosures, following the enhanced transparency we had previously added by utilizing blockchain technology to provide
securitization investors with more timely remittance reporting information on the loans in our Sequoia securitization transactions.
In 2022, we expect a year of transition for the consumer residential mortgage market and we believe Redwood is still positioned
to continue supporting the needs of home buyers. Refinance volumes will likely be lower due to rising rates and will likely lead to
contractions for mortgage originators with excess capacity until margins stabilize, but the quality of our seller network is demonstrated
with nearly 60% of our lock volume during the fourth quarter of 2021 being in purchase-money loans. Continued volatility into
January and February 2022 can also provide opportunities to source loans through bulk acquisition, as market participants re-evaluate
distribution strategies. We also expect a renewed focus by originators toward expanded credit loan products in 2022, to assist home
buyers who are likely to experience declining purchasing power as mortgage rates rise. We have been actively preparing for this
market shift for months, especially as home prices in more geographies across the country exceed conforming loan limits, where
access to homeownership will increasingly rely on the jumbo residential mortgage loans we purchase.
While last year’s substantial home price appreciation had a proportional impact on increasing GSE loan limits, recent adjustments
by the FHFA to the GSEs’ pricing regime for certain high balance and second home mortgage products will be an important factor
contributing to the preservation of the role of private capital in this market. We anticipate that these GSE pricing adjustments will
result in more high balance and second home loans flowing into the private market. We support these recent actions by the FHFA and
anticipate, as we have in years past, playing a meaningful role in providing liquidity to these borrowers. For our Residential business
overall, the goal is to capture increased market share in 2022, with an emphasis on our expanded credit programs that represented up
to 40% of our total loan acquisition volume as recently as late 2019. We believe we are positioned to continue growing market share
through the differentiated quality of our service and our broad array of mortgage banking activities.
Technology continues to play a key part in our business strategy. During 2021, the inaugural year of our RWT Horizons venture
investing initiative, we completed 15 investments in companies with a direct nexus to our operating platforms, including five new
investments during the fourth quarter. Our reputation in venture investing has grown significantly in recent months, with many new
startups actively seeking the type of strategic capital that Redwood can provide. Though RWT Horizons represents a departure from
traditional portfolio investing, we expect our RWT Horizons’ investments to deliver valuable technology and other innovative
efficiencies to our platforms in 2022 while providing option value to shareholders. Our goal by the end of 2022 is to have $50 to $100
million of capital allocated to RWT Horizons across a diversified portfolio of early to mid stage companies.
The topic of LIBOR transition has also been a key focus, as the scheduled LIBOR cessation date in 2023 draws nearer. We have
an established cross-functional group that has evaluated our exposure to LIBOR, reviewed relevant contracts and has monitored
regulatory updates to assess the potential impact to our business, processes and technology from the discontinuation of LIBOR. This
work has helped create a LIBOR transition plan to facilitate an orderly transition to alternative reference rates. We continue to remain
on track with our LIBOR transition plan, which requires different solutions depending on the underlying asset or liability with LIBOR
exposure. As of December 31, 2021, our primary LIBOR exposure included the following: $2.47 billion of repo or warehouse debt,
$2.10 billion of interest rate swaps and swaptions, $708 million of Bridge Loans, and $140 million of trust preferred securities and
subordinated notes debt. Certain of our contracts, such as interest rate swaps, have experienced an orderly market transition and
subsequent to December 31, 2021, we have transitioned a substantial portion of our derivative positions off of LIBOR-benchmarks.
Other of our contracts, such as warehouse debt agreements, require bilateral amendments, which we are currently in the process of
executing and we anticipate most of these facilities will be amended in the first half of 2022, with sufficient time remaining to resolve
the remainder. In early 2022, we began benchmarking all newly originated bridge loans to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate
(“SOFR”), and our existing portfolio of bridge loans are short-dated and we expect the vast majority to mature before the LIBOR
cessation date in 2023. Additionally, as the result of recent legislation that was passed in the state of New York, our trust preferred
securities and subordinated notes are expected to convert to SOFR upon the cessation of LIBOR.
61
2021 Financial Overview
This section includes an overview of our 2021 financial results. A detailed discussion of our results of operations is presented in
the next section of this MD&A. The following table presents selected financial highlights from 2021 and 2020.
Table 1 – Key Financial Results and Metrics
(In Thousands, except per Share Data)
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share (diluted EPS)
Return on equity
Book value per share
Dividends per share
Economic return on book value (1)
Years Ended December 31,
2021
319,613
2.37
25 %
12.06
0.78
30 %
$
$
$
$
2020
(581,847)
(5.12)
Negative
9.91
0.725
Negative
$
$
$
$
(1) Economic return on book value is based on the period change in GAAP book value per common share plus dividends declared per common share in the
period.
Table 2 – Key Operational Metrics
(In Thousands)
Capital Deployed
Residential Loans Purchased
Business Purpose Loans Originated and Purchased
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
$
452,927 $
12,939,263 $
2,287,224 $
386,945
4,483,477
1,431,437
We conduct our business in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking and Investment
Portfolio. Following is an overview of key financial and operational progress at each of our segments during 2021 and a supplemental
discussion of our new RWT Horizons initiative.
Residential Mortgage Banking
During 2021, our Residential Mortgage Banking business benefited from a high level of industy-wide mortgage origination
volume for both purchase and refinance loans as well as higher margins driven by favorable housing dynamics in the broader market,
improvements in our process and speed to market, continued low mortgage rates and positive regulatory changes (including changes to
Qualified Mortgage rules). For the full year of 2021, we locked a record $16.1 billion of loans (unadjusted for pipeline fallout) and
purchased a record $12.9 billion of loans, an increase of 74% and 189%, respectively, from 2020. Overall lock volumes during the
year were split 59% purchase, 41% refinance, and volumes towards the end of the year were more heavily weighted towards purchase
as interest rates rose. During 2021, the residential mortgage origination market experienced some of the highest origination volumes in
decades and our platform grew to not only keep pace with demand, but to expand market share, while maintaining a focus on
operating efficiency.
During 2021, we were able to effectively expand the scale of our platform while growing profitability due to, among other things,
process improvements driven by technology and automation and the breadth and strength of our distribution platform. Throughout
2021, we issued nine Sequoia securitizations backed by $4.2 billion of loans and sold $7.0 billion of loans through our deep and
established network of whole loan buyers. The speed of our distribution execution relative to peers continued to differentiate Redwood
from a risk management perspective as our ability to efficiently distribute acquired loans reduced our exposure to certain financial
risks. In addition, from an operational perspective, we reduced our cost per loan relative to recent historical levels.
62
During 2021, our residential gross margins remained elevated - maintaining a quarterly range of 90 basis points to 183 basis
points. We ended the year at the low end of that range but still towards the high end of Redwood’s longer-term historical target range
of 75 to 100 basis points. Our gross margin represents mortgage banking income earned in the period (net interest income on loan
inventory plus mortgage banking activities) divided by loan purchase commitments entered into during the period. We would
anticipate that going forward in 2022, we will continue to experience volatility and potential compression in margins in the residential
mortgage market as the industry responds to evolving macro economic conditions and right-sizes capacity. Margins on jumbo loans
have historically demonstrated a less volatile range than those for conforming loans, but we cannot be certain that historical trends will
continue.
To start 2022, interest rates continued to rise with a number of rate hikes from the Federal Reserve anticipated in 2022. We expect
overall mortgage origination volumes across the industry to decline; in particular, we anticipate that refinancing opportunities in 2022
will come down dramatically from their 2020 and 2021 peaks (33% of total 2022 volume is estimated by the MBA to be refinance
volume compared to 64% and 59% for 2020 and 2021, respectively) though we also anticipate that purchase activity will continue to
increase. Additionally, our recent acquisition volumes have been almost exclusively within our Select loan program, with some of the
strongest borrower credit profiles we have seen since the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. In order to diversify our product mix to
continue to aggregate loans at scale, we will look to increase our loan purchases under our Redwood Choice and other expanded credit
(including non-QM) loan programs in 2022. Research estimates for non-QM mortgage originations are anticipating significant growth
in volumes in 2022 driven by the declining refinancing opportunity in conforming loans. Furthermore, we believe that the recent loan-
level pricing adjustment ("LLPA") increases on high balance loans and loans on second homes put forth by FHFA, which effectively
results in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac having to offer lower (less competitive) prices to acquire these types of loans, present an
opportunity for more of these loans to flow into the private market, including to companies like Redwood. In 2018, nearly 20% of
Redwood’s purchase volume was in high balance loans, as private label execution compared favorably to the GSEs at the time. Given
this recent announcement by the FHFA, we anticipate our purchases of high balance loans could once again increase.
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
During 2021, our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment, through activities at our wholly owned subsidiary, CoreVest,
continued to grow, scale and gain market share. For the full year, CoreVest funded $2.3 billion of loans, up 60% from 2020.
Momentum for this business increased across the year, even as rates rose, with the fourth quarter representing a quarterly record for
loan funding volume. In terms of the composition of our funding volume in 2021, it primarily consisted of single-family rental loans
(58%) and bridge loans (42%). Our distribution efforts in Business Purpose Mortgage Banking contributed to growing mortgage
banking activities, as we priced four securitizations backed by $1.3 billion of loans, up 10% from 2020. We also diversified our
distribution and financing options for the platform through our inaugural bridge loan securitization and whole loan sale capabilities. In
the fourth quarter, we increased activities within our correspondent business, which buys loans from third parties. This effort remains
small relative to our own organic origination activities, and only represented approximately 5% of full year 2021 funded volume.
Prevailing industry dynamics – most notably consistent demand growth for single-family rentals – continue to attract increased
equity capital and competition to this sector. We believe CoreVest is well positioned to continue gaining additional market share in
what we consider a growing market, driven by its broad suite of products, robust technology platform, proven scale, distinguished
track record and leading distribution capability. In addition, short-term, floating rate and prepay protected assets within our BPL
strategy could support the durability of our overall results as they should theoretically carry lower interest rate sensitivity than longer
duration residential assets.
Investment Portfolio
Our investment portfolio ended 2021 with $11.8 billion of assets, compared to $9.0 billion as of year end 2020. During the year,
we deployed a total of $421 million of capital into new investments, including $222 million in the fourth quarter. The fourth quarter
represented the largest quarter of capital deployment since before the pandemic and we believe we can continue deploying capital
where we see compelling opportunities for us to invest. Since the onset of the pandemic and during most of 2021, attractive
opportunities within our mortgage banking operations, coupled with tight spreads across the securitized products landscape, led to
fairly limited capital deployment in our third party investment portfolio during the course of 2021. In the current higher rate and wider
spread environment, we are selectively deploying capital into investments at attractive entry points due to market volatility- though
markets are evolving rapidly. During the fourth quarter, we added exposure to agency CRT bonds and completed the acquisition of
additional seasoned excess servicing assets. We may have several unique opportunities over the next few years related to calling
underlying securitization transactions (a separate effort from our ongoing work in calling Sequoia and CAFL securitization
transactions detailed below). We also bought additional home equity investments agreements (“HEIs”) through our flow arrangement
with Point Digital. In the third quarter of 2021, we completed our inaugural securitization of HEI assets.
63
We also progressed our Sequoia and CAFL call strategy, exercising call rights to acquire over $290 million of previously
securitized loans in 2021. Overall credit performance in our investment portfolio remained strong to end 2021, as delinquencies
continued to decrease since their peak in the summer of 2020 and strong home price appreciation, robust economic growth and
favorable labor markets kept actual credit losses low. While prepayment speeds have fallen from their peaks in 2021, they remain
elevated – a positive for our credit investments that we generally carry at a discount to par value. As prepayments stay elevated and
principal pays down on the collateral securing our Sequoia and CAFL securitization transactions, the call rights we own within these
structures are also becoming more valuable. Our near- to medium-term outlook for call activity remains heightened given a backdrop
of strong housing fundamentals and we expect up to $700 million of loans to become callable in 2022, at call prices below their
estimated fair values, and another $1.4 billion to become callable through the end of 2024. As we have highlighted throughout the
year, this activity has the potential to continue providing incremental upside to our portfolio value depending on the market conditions
at the time of the call.
RWT Horizons
In 2021 we focused on RWT Horizons, our new investment initiative focused on early-stage technology companies with business
plans focused on innovations that can disrupt the mortgage finance landscape. This initiative demonstrates Redwood’s commitment to
supporting technology that enhances the housing finance industry as well as supporting enhancements and efficiencies across the
Company’s overall platform. As of the end of 2021, we had 15 investments in companies with a nexus to our operating platforms and
had committed approximately $25 million towards RWT Horizons. Our strategy is premised on extracting value at more points along
the mortgage value chain, thereby making us a more meaningful partner to the broad network of market constituents to whom we
provide liquidity, and building relationships designed to benefit all parties. Already in our first year we have seen our investments
support our business. For example, we worked with Point Digital to complete the first ever securitization backed entirely by residential
HEIs, issuing approximately $146 million of asset-backed securities. Co-sponsoring the transaction with a subsidiary of Redwood,
Point was the originator of all the HEIs in the securitization and will continue to service the assets.
Both organically and through RWT Horizons, we continue to build and connect with emerging technologies that we believe will
enhance our business strategies and distribution efforts. To illustrate, we have engaged one of our portfolio companies, Liquid
Mortgage, to use their blockchain technology to make remittance data more readily available for our Sequoia securitizations.
Specifically, by putting this data on blockchain, we are providing investors with more timely remittance reporting information with
which to evaluate our Sequoia offerings.
64
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Within this Results of Operations section, we provide commentary that compares results year-over-year for 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Most tables include "changes" columns that show the amounts by which the year's results are greater or less than the results from the
prior year. Unless otherwise specified, references in this section to increases or decreases in 2021 refer to the change in results from
2020 to 2021, and increases or decreases in 2020 refer to the change in results from 2019 to 2020.
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table presents the components of our net income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 3 – Net Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Net Interest Income
Non-interest Income
Mortgage banking activities, net
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest income (loss), net
General and administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expenses
Net income (loss) before income taxes
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Net Interest Income
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2021
2019
Changes
'21/'20
'20/'19
$ 148,177 $ 123,911 $ 142,473
$ 24,266 $ (18,562)
235,744
128,049
12,018
17,993
393,804
(170,859)
(16,336)
(16,695)
338,091
(18,478)
78,472
(588,438)
4,188
30,424
(475,354)
(115,204)
(11,023)
(108,785)
(586,455)
4,608
87,266
35,500
19,257
23,821
165,844
(108,737)
(9,935)
(13,022)
176,623
(7,440)
157,272
716,487
7,830
(12,431)
869,158
(55,655)
(5,313)
92,090
924,546
(23,086)
(8,794)
(623,938)
(15,069)
6,603
(641,198)
(6,467)
(1,088)
(95,763)
(763,078)
12,048
$ 319,613 $ (581,847) $ 169,183
$ 901,460 $ (751,030)
Net interest income increased in 2021, primarily due to a $16 million increase in net interest income earned on loans held in
inventory during the year at our residential mortgage banking operations and a $5 million increase in net interest income earned from
our investment portfolio. The increase from residential mortgage banking operations primarily resulted from higher loan acquisition
volumes and average balances of loans outstanding in 2021 as compared to 2020. The increase from our investment portfolio was
primarily attributable to an increase in the average balance of our bridge loans, Sequoia securities and CAFL securities driven by new
assets transferred from our mortgage banking operations, as well as higher discount accretion on our available-for-sale securities
driven by an increase in expected call activity.
Net interest income decreased in 2020, primarily due to lower average asset balances relative to 2019 resulting from portfolio
repositioning, including significant asset sales in the first half of 2020, as well as higher borrowing costs associated with non-
marginable and non-recourse debt facilities we entered into during 2020.
Additional detail on net interest income is provided in the “Net Interest Income” section that follows.
Mortgage Banking Activities, Net
Income from mortgage banking activities, net includes results from both our residential and business purpose mortgage banking
operations. The increase in income from mortgage banking activities during 2021 was attributable to a $123 million increase from our
residential mortgage banking operations and a $34 million increase from our business purpose mortgage banking operations. The
increase in income at both our mortgage banking operations was primarily driven by higher loan production volumes in 2021 as
compared to 2020, when volumes and margins were adversely impacted by disruptions following the onset of the pandemic.
65
The $9 million decrease in 2020 was predominantly due to a decrease in loan acquisition volumes at our residential mortgage
banking business as a result of market disruptions following the onset of the pandemic. These decreases were partially offset by an
increase in mortgage banking income from our business purpose mortgage banking operations, which benefited from a full year of
income after our acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest in March and October of 2019, respectively.
A more detailed analysis of the changes in this line item is included in the “Results of Operations by Segment” section that
follows.
Investment Fair Value Changes, Net
Investment fair value changes, net, is primarily comprised of the change in fair value of our investment portfolio assets that are
accounted for under the fair value option and interest rate hedges associated with these investments.
During 2021, positive investment fair value changes reflected improved credit performance and spread tightening across our
investment portfolio. While credit performance in our portfolio improved throughout the year, credit spreads tightened more
significantly in the first half of the year, with sequentially smaller increases in the third and fourth quarters. In January and early
February of 2022, interest rates have increased and credit spreads have widened across most asset classes, including for certain assets
we own. While our investments continue to experience strong credit performance, spread widening to date, and any further spread
widening, could result in negative investment fair value changes for our investments in 2022.
The negative investment fair value changes recorded during 2020 were primarily driven by realized losses incurred on assets sales
and derivative settlements that occurred in March and April of that year, as we repositioned our portfolio in response to disruptions
following the onset of the pandemic. Approximately $360 million of losses were realized from such sales and settlements. The
remaining net losses for the year were primarily associated with assets we retained that experienced a significant decline in value
during the first quarter of 2020 and had not fully recovered their value through the end of the year, as well as negative fair value
changes on our interest only securities resulting from lower benchmark interest rates and higher prepayment speeds during 2020.
During 2019, the positive investment fair value changes primarily resulted from tightening credit spreads in several investment
classes.
Additional detail on our investment fair value changes is included in the “Results of Operations by Segment” section that follows.
Other Income
The increase in other income for 2021 was primarily the result of a $12 million increase in income from our MSR investments,
which experienced a more moderate rise in prepayment speeds during 2021 as compared to 2020, when prepayment speeds rose
sharply after the onset of the pandemic when benchmark interest rates declined. This increase was partially offset by: lower risk share
income, as our risk share investments experienced accelerated prepayments during the second half of 2020 and throughout 2021;
lower FHLBC capital stock dividends, as we redeemed most of our FHLBC stock in 2020 when we repaid our FHLBC borrowings;
and lower income from loan administration fees, as the BPL loans associated with those fees were paid off in 2020. Details on the
composition of other income is included in Note 20 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The $15 million decrease in other income in 2020 was primarily the result of losses on our MSR investments, which were driven
primarily by increased prepayment speeds, resulting from declines in interest rates during 2020.
Realized Gains, Net
In 2021, we realized gains of $18 million, including $16 million of gains resulting from calls of seven seasoned Sequoia
securitizations, and $1.5 million of net gains from the sale of $11 million of AFS securities.
For 2020, we realized gains of $30 million, including $25 million of gains from the repurchase of $125 million of convertible debt
and $5 million of net gains from the sale of $55 million of AFS securities. Of note, all of the gains from extinguishment of debt were
excluded from our diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2021, in accordance with GAAP. For 2019, we realized
gains of $24 million, primarily from the sale of $110 million of AFS securities and the call of a seasoned Sequoia securitization in the
first quarter.
General and Administrative Expenses
The increase in general and administrative expenses for 2021 primarily resulted from increased accruals of variable compensation
expense associated with improved financial results and a higher headcount in 2021 as compared to 2020, as well as higher long-term
incentive award expense from awards granted in the second half of 2020, including retention-related awards, and awards granted in
early 2021 as part of our regular annual compensation process. We also incurred higher systems and consulting costs in 2021, as we
re-engineered and implemented new systems and processes to drive longer-term efficiencies throughout our business.
66
In April of 2020, we implemented a workforce reduction as a result of the disruptions following the onset of the pandemic, but
then began hiring new employees in the second half of 2020 as our mortgage banking operations began to recover, and ended 2020
with 247 full-time employees. During 2021, we added additional headcount to support the strong growth our business experienced
during the year and ended 2021 with 298 full-time employees. As a result of our increased headcount through 2021, as well as tight
labor market conditions that have driven-up compensation costs, we entered 2022 with higher fixed compensation costs relative to
2021, and anticipate those costs may continue to increase throughout the year.
The $6 million increase in general and administrative expenses in 2020 primarily resulted from $14 million of additional expenses
at our Business Purpose Lending segment, driven by a full year of operations at our now-combined 5 Arches and CoreVest platforms.
This increase was partially offset by a $9 million decrease in general and administrative expenses at our Residential Lending segment,
driven by a decrease in loan acquisition activity at our residential mortgage banking business as well as the workforce reduction in
2020.
Details on the composition of General and administrative expenses are included in Note 21 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Loan Acquisition Costs
The increase in loan acquisition costs for 2021 was primarily due to higher loan origination volumes throughout 2021 as
compared to 2020. The increase in loan acquisition costs for 2020 relative to 2019 resulted from an increase in origination activity at
our business purpose mortgage banking operations, primarily as a result of the acquisition of CoreVest, and was partially offset by a
reduction in expenses from lower acquisition volumes at our residential mortgage banking operations in 2020.
Other Expenses
The decrease in other expenses for 2021 was related to $89 million of goodwill impairment expense at our Business Purpose
Mortgage Banking segment recorded in the first quarter of 2020 that was taken as a result of the onset of the pandemic and economic
downturn that ensued.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes is almost entirely related to activity at our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which primarily includes our
mortgage banking operations and MSR investments, as well as certain other investment and hedging activities.
For 2021, the tax provision is reflective of the positive income earned at our taxable subsidiaries and higher state income taxes,
partially offset by a $19 million benefit from the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The benefit from income taxes
in 2020 resulted from GAAP losses at our TRS during that year, partially offset by a valuation allowance recorded against our federal
net ordinary deferred tax assets.
67
Net Interest Income
The following tables present the components of net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 4 – Net Interest Income
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Income
2021
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Balance (1)
Yield
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Balance (1)
Yield
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Balance (1)
Yield
Residential loans, held-for-sale
$ 49,779 $ 1,635,663
3.0 % $ 19,985 $
538,580
3.7 % $ 39,355 $
888,690
4.4 %
Residential loans - HFI at
Redwood (2)
Residential loans - HFI at
Legacy Sequoia (2)
Residential loans - HFI at
Sequoia (2)
Residential loans - HFI at
Freddie Mac SLST (2)
Business purpose loans - HFS
—
—
— %
21,000
494,097
4.3 %
92,340
2,321,288
4.0 %
4,709
254,830
1.8 %
9,059
316,844
2.9 %
17,640
453,563
3.9 %
74,025
1,983,936
3.7 %
87,093
1,883,855
4.6 % 108,778
2,273,514
4.8 %
76,288
14,443
2,067,313
294,634
3.7 %
4.9 %
85,609
20,415
2,209,182
378,293
3.9 %
5.4 %
57,840
7,991
1,531,361
148,037
3.8 %
5.4 %
Business purpose loans - HFI
54,510
719,907
7.6 %
60,252
842,296
7.2 %
22,742
298,040
7.6 %
Single-family rental loans - HFI
at CAFL
Multifamily loans - HFI at
Freddie Mac K-Series
Trading securities
Available-for-sale securities
Other interest income
Total interest income
Interest Expense
201,838
3,404,933
5.9 % 136,950
2,544,738
5.4 %
23,072
439,165
5.3 %
19,266
22,783
31,921
25,364
574,926
486,095
146,328
129,261
817,808
11,940,708
54,813
4.0 %
33,940
15.6 %
15,665
24.7 %
3.1 %
27,135
4.8 % 571,916
1,404,068
286,382
140,783
775,386
11,814,504
3.9 % 132,600
70,359
11.9 %
21,463
11.1 %
3.5 %
28,101
4.8 % 622,281
3,373,743
1,119,220
182,251
605,863
13,634,735
3.9 %
6.3 %
11.8 %
4.6 %
4.6 %
Short-term debt facilities
(37,714)
1,670,279
(2.3) %
(44,454)
1,188,487
(3.7) %
(73,558)
1,973,542
(3.7) %
Short-term debt - servicer
advance financing
Short-term debt - convertible
notes, net
ABS issued - Legacy Sequoia (2)
ABS issued - Sequoia (2)
ABS issued - Freddie Mac
SLST (2)
ABS issued - Freddie Mac K-
Series
ABS issued - CAFL
Long-term debt facilities
Long-term debt - FHLBC
Long-term debt - corporate
Total interest expense
Net Interest Income
(4,867)
183,335
(2.7) %
(6,441)
201,175
(3.2) %
(11,952)
219,307
(5.4) %
—
(3,040)
(59,949)
—
251,855
1,755,124
— %
(1.2) %
(3.4) %
—
(5,945)
(73,643)
—
312,351
1,681,490
— %
(1.9) %
(4.4) %
(10,996)
(14,418)
(93,354)
174,433
445,342
2,052,697
(6.3) %
(3.2) %
(4.5) %
(64,633)
1,805,744
(3.6) %
(66,859)
1,897,194
(3.5) %
(42,574)
1,237,205
(3.4) %
(17,686)
(160,493)
(40,516)
(2)
(37,849)
(426,749)
$ 148,177
456,353
3,173,576
794,144
279
651,156
10,741,845
(3.9) %
(51,521)
(5.1) % (101,740)
(45,318)
(5.1) %
(10,411)
(0.7) %
(5.8) %
(41,673)
(4.0) % (448,005)
$ 123,911
1,324,678
2,363,624
708,611
589,269
693,838
10,960,717
(3.9) % (126,948)
(17,172)
(4.3) %
(2,105)
(6.4) %
(48,999)
(1.8) %
(6.0) %
(37,732)
(4.1) % (479,808)
$ 142,473
3,184,441
401,467
49,988
1,999,999
626,290
12,364,711
(4.0) %
(4.3) %
(4.2) %
(2.4) %
(6.0) %
(3.9) %
(1)
(2)
Average balances for residential loans held-for-sale and held-for-investment, business purpose loans held-for-sale and held-for-investment, multifamily
loans held-for-investment, and trading securities are calculated based upon carrying values, which represent estimated fair values. Average balances for
available-for-sale securities, short-term debt, long-term debt and certain ABS issued are calculated based upon amortized historical cost. Average
balances for ABS carried at fair value are calculated based upon fair value.
Interest income from residential loans held-for-investment ("HFI") at Redwood exclude loans HFI at consolidated Sequoia or Freddie Mac SLST
entities. Interest income from residential loans - HFI at Legacy Sequoia and the interest expense from ABS issued - Legacy Sequoia represent activity
from our consolidated Legacy Sequoia entities. Interest income from residential loans - HFI at Sequoia and the interest expense from ABS issued -
Sequoia represent activity from our consolidated Sequoia entities. Interest income from residential loans - HFI at Freddie Mac SLST and the interest
expense from ABS issued - Freddie Mac SLST represent activity from our consolidated Freddie Mac SLST entities.
68
The following table details how net interest income changed on a consolidated basis as a result of changes in average investment
balances (“volume”) and changes in interest yields (“rate”).
Table 5 – Net Interest Income - Volume and Rate Changes
(In Thousands)
Net Interest Income for the Beginning of
the Year
Impact of Changes in Interest Income
Change in Net Interest Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
Volume
2021
Rate
Total
Volume
$ 123,911
2020
Rate
Total
$ 142,473
Residential loans - HFS
$
40,708 $
(10,915)
29,793 $
(15,504) $
(3,866)
(19,370)
Residential loans - HFI at Redwood
(21,001)
—
(21,001)
(72,684)
1,346
(71,338)
Residential loans - HFI at Legacy Sequoia
(1,774)
(2,577)
(4,351)
(5,317)
(3,264)
(8,581)
Residential loans - HFI at Sequoia
4,627
(17,695)
(13,068)
(18,644)
(3,041)
(21,685)
Residential loans - HFI at Freddie Mac SLST
(5,498)
(3,824)
(9,322)
(4,515)
(1,458)
(5,973)
Impact of Changes in Interest Expense
Short-term debt facilities
(18,021)
24,764
Business purpose loans - HFS
Business purpose loans - HFI
Single-family rental loans - HFI at CAFL
Bridge loans - HFI at CAFL
Multifamily loans - HFI at Freddie Mac K-
Series
Trading securities
Available-for-sale securities
Other interest income
Net changes in interest income
Short-term debt - servicer advance financing
Short-term debt - convertible notes, net
ABS issued - Legacy Sequoia
ABS issued - Sequoia
ABS issued - Freddie Mac SLST
ABS issued - Freddie Mac K-Series
ABS issued - CAFL
Long-term debt facilities
Long-term debt - FHLBC
Long-term debt - corporate
Net changes in interest expense
Net changes in interest income and expense
Net Interest Income for the Year Ended
(14,192)
46,293
—
(35,836)
(16,598)
3,086
18,595
5,364
289
5,441
25,602
12,431
41,530
2,167
(8)
(4,020)
27,769
12,423
37,510
110,619
3,259
113,878
—
—
—
(11,106)
64,888
5,364
(35,547)
(77,415)
(372)
(77,787)
(11,157)
(52,356)
15,937
(36,419)
(1,282)
17,538
16,256
(4,884)
(914)
(5,798)
1,485
(3,255)
(1,770)
7,863
(8,830)
(967)
(7,583)
10,589
3,006
(48,759)
(1,606)
(50,365)
571
—
1,151
(3,225)
3,223
33,772
1,003
—
1,754
16,919
(997)
63
6,743
1,574
—
2,905
13,694
2,226
33,835
29,260
988
10,996
4,306
16,882
(157)
29,103
4,523
—
4,167
2,829
5,511
10,996
8,473
19,711
(22,711)
74,140
(1,574)
1,287
(24,285)
75,427
(34,864)
(23,888)
(58,752)
(83,927)
(640)
(84,567)
(5,470)
10,272
10,406
2,564
(9,893)
(17,476)
3
1,260
31,153
41,742
4,802
10,409
3,824
21,260
24,266
(27,735)
(15,478)
(43,213)
34,562
(4,070)
32,691
4,026
129
38,588
(3,941)
(888)
31,803
(16,068)
(2,494)
(18,562)
$ 148,177
$ 123,911
69
Net Interest Income by Segment
The following table presents the components of net interest income by segment for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and
2019.
Table 6 – Net Interest Income by Segment
(In Thousands)
Net Interest Income by Segment
Residential Mortgage Banking
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
Investment Portfolio
Corporate/Other
Net Interest Income
Residential Mortgage Banking
Years Ended December 31,
Changes
2021
2020
2019
'21/'20
'20/'19
$
21,990 $
5,861 $
19,398
$
16,129 $
(13,537)
6,824
6,055
3,240
155,538
150,479
165,331
(36,175)
(38,484)
(45,496)
769
5,059
2,309
2,815
(14,852)
7,012
$
148,177 $
123,911 $
142,473
$
24,266 $
(18,562)
Net interest income from this segment represents interest earned on our residential loans held in inventory from the time we
purchase loans to when they are sold or securitized, net of interest expense incurred for debt we use to finance the loans. The change in
net interest income from 2019 to 2021 is primarily reflective of the change in the average balance of loans held in inventory in each
year, which were $1.64 billion, $539 million and $889 million for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Additionally, the decrease in
2020 reflected higher borrowing costs as we shifted a significant portion of our debt for our loan inventory from marginable to non-
marginable facilities and experienced higher borrowing costs in general after the disruptions following the onset of the pandemic in
early to mid 2020. In the later part of 2020 and throughout 2021, we were able to lower our borrowing costs by reducing the interest
rates on many of our facilities used to finance our residential loan inventory. Additionally, we employed higher leverage on our loan
inventory in 2021 relative to 2019, which accounts for the lower relative increase in net interest income in 2021 despite an average
balance nearly twice as high.
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
Net interest income from this segment represents interest earned on our business purpose loans held in inventory from the time we
originate or purchase loans to when they are securitized, sold or transferred into our investment portfolio, net of interest expense
incurred for debt we use to finance the loans. The increase in net interest income from 2020 to 2021 was primarily attributable to
lower borrowing costs in 2021, partially offset by a lower average balance of loans (i.e. the time between when we fund a loan and
distribute that loan). While we originated significantly more loans in 2021 than 2020, the lower average balance of loans reflected
faster turn times for loans, ultimately resulting in greater capital efficiency. The increase in net interest income from 2019 to 2020
primarily reflected a full year of operating activity in 2020, as we only began originating business purpose loans and carrying loan
inventory after we acquired 5 Arches and CoreVest in 2019.
Investment Portfolio
Net interest income from this segment represents interest income earned on our investment assets, net of interest expense incurred
for debt we use to finance these assets. The increase in net interest income from 2020 to 2021 was primarily attributable to an increase
in the average balance of our bridge loans, Sequoia securities and CAFL securities, which was driven by new assets transferred from
our mortgage banking operations. Additionally, we experienced higher accretion income on our available-for-sale securities during the
second half of 2021, when we began to incorporate the impact of expected calls of securities into our cash flow projections. This
increased discount accretion to $20 million in the second half of 2021 from $3 million in the first half of the year. As securitization
transactions are called and the number of future transactions expected to be called diminishes, and if prepayment speeds slow given
rising interest rates, we expect the amount of income we recognize from discount accretion to decrease throughout 2022 from levels
experienced in the fourth quarter of 2021. The reduction in net interest income in 2020 from 2019 was primarily attributable to a lower
overall average balance of investments in 2020 resulting from asset sales in the first half of 2020, when we repositioned our portfolio
in response to disruptions following the onset of the pandemic.
70
Corporate/Other
The Corporate/Other line item in the table above includes interest expense on our convertible debt and trust-preferred securities
and net interest income from consolidated Legacy Sequoia entities. The $2 million decrease in net interest expense from Corporate/
Other during 2021 resulted from a $4 million reduction in interest expense from our corporate debt, partially offset by $1 million of
lower net interest income from our Legacy Sequoia entities. The decrease in interest expense from our corporate debt was due to a
lower average balance of long-term debt in 2021 as compared to 2020, as we repurchased $125 million of convertible debt during the
second quarter of 2020. Additionally, in the first half of 2020, we terminated derivatives that served to fix the effective interest rate on
our floating rate trust preferred securities and subordinated notes. As these derivatives were designated as cash flow hedges, their fair
value at termination (representing the amount paid to terminate the derivatives) is being amortized over the remaining life of the trust
preferred securities and subordinated notes as a component of interest expense and totaled $4 million in 2021. The $7 million decrease
in net interest expense from Corporate/Other in 2020 was primarily due to a lower average balance of long-term debt as compared to
2019, as we repaid $201 million of our convertible debt in November 2019 and repurchased $125 million of convertible debt during
the second quarter of 2020.
71
Results of Operations by Segment
Overview
We report on our business using three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking, and
Investment Portfolio. During the fourth quarter of 2021, we changed our segments and conformed the results of all prior periods
presented herein. For additional information on our segments, refer to Note 23 in Part II, Item 8 and Part I, Item 1 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents the segment contribution from our three segments reconciled to our consolidated net income for the
years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 7 – Segment Results Summary
(In Thousands)
Segment Contribution from:
Residential Mortgage Banking
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
Investment Portfolio
Corporate/Other
Net Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
Changes
2021
2020
2019
'21/'20
'20/'19
$
82,414 $
(8,989) $
37,388
$
91,403 $
(46,377)
38,528
293,230
(67,726)
9,201
(438,883)
223,396
106,254
732,113
(76,927)
(662,279)
(94,559)
(66,249)
(100,802)
(28,310)
34,553
$
319,613 $
(581,847) $
169,183
$ 901,460 $
(751,030)
Following is an overview of the changes in net income (loss) from our segments. The sections that follow this overview provide
further detail for our three business segments and their results of operations.
Residential Mortgage Banking
Our residential mortgage banking business experienced growing loan lock volumes throughout 2019 and into the first quarter of
2020, when disruptions following the onset of the pandemic resulted in a widespread economic downturn that caused us to
significantly curtail our loan lock activity in the first half of 2020. While we began to ramp our loan lock activity back up in the
second half of the year, our loan lock volumes and profit margins experienced a meaningful decline from 2019 to 2020. In 2021, we
experienced a significant increase in loan lock volumes and strong profitability, which drove a large increase in income for the year
relative to 2020.
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
We acquired 5 Arches and CoreVest in the first and fourth quarters of 2019, respectively, marking our entry into business purpose
mortgage banking. Activities from these operations were ramping-up in late 2019 and in the first quarter of 2020, when disruptions
following the onset of the pandemic impacted the business, resulting in a meaningful reduction in loan originations during the second
and third quarters of that year. Loan fundings from these operations began to ramp back up in the fourth quarter of 2020 and grew
meaningfully throughout 2021, with strong margins helping to drive profitability for 2021. Results from 2020 included an $89 million
expense for the write-off of our entire goodwill balance associated with this segment that was taken in the first quarter of 2020 as a
result of disruptions following the onset of the pandemic and economic downturn that ensued. Exclusive of this non-cash goodwill
impairment expense, net income from this segment in 2020 was $21 million.
Investment Portfolio
Net income from our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of net interest income earned on our investments assets and
changes in the fair value of those assets, as the vast majority of our investments are carried under the fair value option with changes in
their fair values recorded through our income statement. The $662 million decrease in net income in 2020 and the increase of $732
million in 2021, primarily resulted from negative investment fair value changes in 2020 as we repositioned our portfolio in response to
liquidity related market disruptions in March and April of that year following the onset of the pandemic, as well as negative fair value
changes on our interest only securities resulting from lower benchmark interest rates and higher prepayment speeds during 2020.
Positive investment fair value changes in 2021 reflected continuing improvement in credit performance and spread tightening across
our investment portfolio during the year. Additionally, net interest income from this segment declined from 2019 to 2020, then
increased incrementally in 2021, as discussed in the preceding Net Interest Income by Segment section.
72
Corporate/Other
The $28 million increase in net expense from Corporate/Other in 2021 was primarily due to a $24 million increase in general and
administrative expense in 2021 and a $25 million gain associated with the repurchase of $125 million of convertible debt in the second
quarter of 2020, partially offset by a $19 million benefit from income taxes in 2021. The increase in general and administrative
expenses primarily resulted from increased accruals of variable compensation expense associated with improved financial results and a
higher headcount in 2021 as compared to 2020, as well as higher long-term incentive award expense from awards granted in the
second half of 2020, including retention related awards, and awards granted in early 2021 as part of our regular annual compensation
process. The benefit from income taxes in 2021 within corporate was related to the reversal of valuation allowance on certain deferred
tax assets.
The $35 million decrease in net expense from Corporate/Other in 2020 was primarily due to the $25 million gain associated with
the repurchase of convertible debt in 2020 and the associated reduction in interest expense from the repurchase.
Residential Mortgage Banking Segment
Our Residential Mortgage Banking segment consists of a mortgage loan conduit that acquires residential loans from third-party
originators for subsequent sale, securitization through our Sequoia private-label securitization program, or transfer into our investment
portfolio. We typically acquire prime jumbo mortgages and the related mortgage servicing rights on a flow basis from our network of
loan sellers. This segment also includes various derivative financial instruments that we utilize to manage certain risks associated with
our inventory of residential loans held-for-sale within this segment. This segment’s main source of mortgage banking income is net
interest income from its inventory of loans held-for-sale, as well as income from mortgage banking activities, which includes valuation
increases (or gains) on loans we acquire and subsequently sell, securitize, or transfer into our investment portfolio, and the hedges
used to manage risks associated with these activities. Direct operating expenses and tax expenses associated with these activities are
also included in this segment.
Net income from this segment is primarily comprised of net interest income earned on loans while they are held in inventory,
mark-to-market adjustments on loans from the time loan purchase commitments are entered into until loans are sold or securitized,
gains/losses from associated hedges, and all direct expenses associated with these activities. Subordinate securities that we retain from
our Sequoia securitizations (many of which we consolidate for GAAP purposes) are transferred to and held in our Investment Portfolio
segment.
The following table provides the activity of residential loans held in inventory for sale at our mortgage banking business during
the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 8 – Loan Inventory for Residential Mortgage Banking Operations — Activity
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Acquisitions
Sales
Transfers between segments(1)
Principal repayments
Changes in fair value, net
Balance at End of Period
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
176,641 $
536,385
12,939,263
(8,449,329)
(3,035,095)
(41,458)
83,214
$
1,673,236 $
4,483,477
(5,007,990)
263,172
(85,790)
(12,613)
176,641
(1) Represents the fair value of loans transferred from held-for-sale at our Residential Mortgage Banking segment to held-for-investment at our
Investment Portfolio segment, associated with securitizations we sponsored that we consolidate under GAAP.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, our residential mortgage loan correspondent channel locked $16.09 billion of loans,
purchased $12.94 billion of loans, sold $8.45 billion of loans to third parties, and securitized $4.20 billion of loans through nine
separate transactions. At December 31, 2021, we had $1.67 billion of loans in inventory on our balance sheet and our loan pipeline
included $1.25 billion of loans identified for purchase (gross loan locks outstanding, unadjusted for expected fallout) and had
outstanding forward sale agreements for $650 million of loans.
73
We utilize a combination of capital and financing from our residential loan warehouse facilities to manage our inventory of
residential loans held-for-sale. At December 31, 2021, we had residential warehouse facilities outstanding with seven different
counterparties, with $2.90 billion of total capacity and $1.23 billion of available capacity. These included non-marginable (i.e., not
subject to margin calls based on the market value of the underlying collateral) facilities with $1.4 billion of total capacity and
marginable facilities with $1.5 billion of total capacity.
The following table presents key earnings and operating metrics for our Residential Mortgage Banking segment for the years
ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Table 9 – Residential Mortgage Banking Earnings Summary and Operating Metrics
(In Thousands)
Mortgage banking income
Operating expenses
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
Segment Contribution
Loan purchase commitments entered into
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
$
$
149,141 $
(40,950)
(25,777)
9,582 $
(23,138)
4,567
67,140
(25,678)
(4,074)
82,414 $
11,520,508 $
(8,989) $
4,817,150 $
37,388
7,012,962
Residential mortgage banking income presented in the table above is comprised of net interest income from residential loans held-
for-sale in inventory and mortgage banking activities, net from this segment. Income from mortgage banking activities is comprised of
mark-to-market adjustments on loans from the time they are purchased to when they are sold, mark-to-market adjustments on new and
outstanding loan purchase commitments, gains/losses from associated hedges, and other miscellaneous income/expenses (see Note 19
in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail on the composition of mortgage banking activities). Operating
expenses presented in the table above includes general and administrative expenses, loan acquisition costs and other expenses for this
segment.
In the preceding Results of Operations by Segment Overview section, we discussed the major factors impacting the change in net
income (segment contribution) from our Residential Mortgage Banking segment from 2019 to 2021. Following, we provide additional
detail on the changes in segment contribution from 2020 to 2021.
The increase in mortgage banking income in 2021 was primarily driven by higher loan purchase commitments (as presented in the
table above) and higher gross margins relative to 2020. Our gross margin (mortgage banking income earned in the period divided by
loan purchase commitments entered into during the period) averaged 129 basis points in 2021 as compared to 20 basis points in 2020.
After benchmark interest rates declined following the onset of the pandemic in early 2020, mortgage rates decreased and loan
refinance activity increased sharply, helping to drive growing acquisition volumes in the second half of 2020 and into 2021. During
the first three quarters of 2021, we experienced strong loan lock volumes and margins, driving large increases in mortgage banking
income relative to 2020. Throughout 2021, the mix of our loan locks gradually transitioned from a majority of refinancings to a
majority of purchase-money loans, with purchase money loans comprising 38% of total loan locks in the first quarter and 59% in the
fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2021, income from residential mortgage banking activities decreased from third quarter levels,
as market conditions during the fourth quarter prompted us to decrease loan purchase commitments in order to preserve margin on our
loan purchase activities. The rise in mortgage interest rates and interest rate volatility experienced in the fourth quarter of 2021 has
accelerated thus far in 2022. We expect any continued increases in mortgage rates and further volatility in market conditions could
negatively impact both our origination volumes and profitability in the near-term while markets adjust to these new conditions.
Operating expenses at our Residential mortgage banking segment increased in 2021 compared to 2020, as we implemented a
workforce reduction in April of 2020 following the onset of the pandemic, then gradually grew our workforce throughout the second
half of 2020 and into 2021 to support increasing production volumes. Additionally, the increase in general and administrative
expenses reflected higher accruals of variable compensation expense associated with improved financial results at this segment and a
higher headcount in 2021 as compared to 2020. We also incurred higher systems and consulting costs in 2021, as we re-engineered
and implemented new systems and processes at this segment. Loan acquisition costs at this segment increased as a result of higher
loan purchases in 2021 relative to 2020.
Activity at this segment is performed within our taxable REIT subsidiary, and the increase in provision for income taxes in 2021
from 2020 generally reflects the higher income earned year over year by this segment.
74
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking Segment
Overview
Our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment consists of a platform that originates and acquires business purpose loans for
subsequent securitization, sale, or transfer into our investment portfolio. We originate single-family rental and bridge loans and
typically distribute most of our single-family rental loans through our CAFL private-label securitization program, or on occasion
through whole loan sales, and will transfer our bridge loans to the Investment Portfolio where they will either be retained for
investment or securitized. Single-family rental loans are business purpose mortgage loans to investors in single-family (primarily 1-4
unit) rental properties. Bridge loans are business purpose mortgage loans to investors rehabilitating and subsequently reselling or
renting residential and small-balance multifamily properties. This segment also includes various derivative financial instruments that
we utilize to manage certain risks associated with our inventory of single-family rental loans held-for-sale. This segment’s main
source of mortgage banking income are net interest income earned on loans while they are held in inventory, origination fees on loans,
mark-to-market adjustments on loans from the time loans are originated or purchased to when they are sold, securitized or transferred
into our investment portfolio, and gains/losses from associated hedges. Direct operating expenses and tax expenses associated with
these activities are also included in this segment.
Net income from this segment is primarily comprised of net interest income earned on loans while they are held in inventory,
mark-to-market adjustments on loans from the time they are originated or acquired until loans are sold, securitized or transferred to
our investment portfolio, gains/losses from associated hedges, and all direct expenses associated with these activities. Subordinate
securities that we retain from our CAFL securitizations (which we consolidate for GAAP purposes) and bridge loans we originate in
this segment are transferred to and held in our Investment Portfolio segment.
The following table provides the business purpose loan origination activity at Redwood during the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020.
Table 10 – Business Purpose Loans — Funding Activity
(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Single-
Family
Rental
Bridge (1)
Total
Single-
Family
Rental
Bridge (1)
Total
Fair value at beginning of period
$
245,394 $
— $
245,394 $
331,565 $
— $
331,565
Fundings
1,327,001
960,223
2,287,224
979,883
451,554
1,431,437
Sales
Transfers between segments (2)
Principal repayments
Changes in fair value, net
(201,629)
(2,484)
(204,113)
(110,836)
(25,151)
(135,987)
(1,023,988)
(962,573)
(1,986,561)
(1,000,165)
(423,487)
(1,423,652)
(62,209)
73,740
—
4,834
(62,209)
(54,395)
—
(54,395)
78,574
99,342
(2,916)
96,426
Fair Value at End of Period
$
358,309 $
— $
358,309 $
245,394 $
— $
245,394
(1) We originate bridge loans at our TRS and then transfer them to our REIT. Origination fees and any fair value changes on these loans prior to
transfer are recognized within Mortgage banking activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). Once the loans are transferred
to our REIT, they are classified as held-for-investment, with subsequent fair value changes generally recorded through Investment fair value
changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). For bridge loans held at our REIT that are transferred into our CAFL bridge
securitization, we record any changes in fair value from the date of origination or purchase to the time of securitization as Mortgage banking
activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). Once loans are transferred into this securitization, any changes in fair value are
recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). For the carrying value and activity of our
bridge loans held-for-investment, see the Investment Portfolio section that follows.
(2) For single-family rental loans, amounts represent transfers of loans from held-for-sale at our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment to
held-for-investment at our Investment Portfolio segment, associated with securitizations we sponsored that we consolidate under GAAP. For
bridge loans, represents the transfer of loans originated or acquired by our Business purpose mortgage banking group at our TRS and transferred
to Investment Portfolio segment at our REIT as described in preceding footnote.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we funded $1.33 billion of single-family rental loans, sold $202 million of such loans
to third parties and securitized $1.04 billion of loans through four separate transactions. At December 31, 2021, we had $358 million
of single-family rental loans in inventory on our balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we funded $960 million of
bridge loans, sold $2 million of loans to a third party and transferred the remaining loans to our Investment Portfolio segment,
including $359 million of loans that were contributed into a revolving bridge loan securitization we completed in the third quarter of
2021.
75
We utilize a combination of capital and financing from loan warehouse facilities to manage our inventory of single-family rental
loans that we hold for sale. At December 31, 2021, we had business purpose warehouse facilities outstanding with three different
counterparties, with $1.30 billion of total capacity (used for both SFR and bridge loans) and $648 million of available capacity. All of
these facilities are non-marginable (i.e., not subject to margin calls based on the market value of the underlying collateral).
The following table presents an earnings summary for our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment for the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Table 11 – Business Purpose Mortgage Banking Earnings Summary
(In Thousands)
Mortgage banking income
Operating expenses
Provision for income taxes
Segment Contribution
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
$
116,463 $
83,804 $
(69,813)
(8,122)
(147,467)
(4,063)
38,528 $
(67,726) $
47,727
(37,579)
(947)
9,201
Business purpose mortgage banking income presented in the table above is comprised of net interest income from single-family
rental (SFR) loans held-for-sale in inventory, mortgage banking activities, net and other income, net for this segment. Income from
mortgage banking activities is comprised of mark-to-market adjustments on loans from the time they are originated or purchased until
they are sold, securitized or transferred into our investment portfolio, gains/losses from associated hedges, and other miscellaneous
income/expenses (see Note 19 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail on the composition of mortgage
banking activities). Operating expenses presented in the table above includes general and administrative expenses, loan acquisition
costs and other expenses for this segment.
In the preceding Results of Operations by Segment Overview section, we discussed the major factors impacting the change in net
income (segment contribution) from our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment from 2019 to 2021. Following, we provide
additional detail on the changes in segment contribution from 2020 to 2021.
The increase in mortgage banking income in 2021 primarily resulted from a significant increase in both SFR and bridge loan
origination volumes in 2021 compared to 2020 (as presented in Table 11 above). In the second half of 2021, we began to build out a
new business purpose loan correspondent channel, which purchased $137 million of loans in 2021 (which amounts are included in
loan fundings, within Table 10 above).
Operating expenses at our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking segment for 2020 included $89 million of expense from the write-
off of the segment's entire goodwill balance as a result of disruptions following the onset of the pandemic and the economic downturn
that ensued. Exclusive of this non-cash goodwill impairment expense, operating expenses at this segment in 2020 were $59 million
and increased relative to 2019, as we incurred a full year of operating expenses for these operations after the acquisitions of 5 Arches
and CoreVest in March and October of 2019, respectively. The increase in operating expenses from 2020 to 2021 (exclusive of the
write-off of goodwill), was primarily related to higher general and administrative expenses, which reflected both higher headcount in
2021 to support increased business activity and higher accruals of variable compensation expense associated with improved financial
results at this segment in 2021 as compared to 2020.
Activity at this segment is performed within our taxable REIT subsidiary, and the increase in provision for income taxes in 2021
from 2020 generally reflects the higher income earned year over year by this segment.
Investment Portfolio Segment
Our Investment Portfolio segment consists of investments sourced through our residential and business purpose mortgage banking
operations, including primarily securities retained from our residential and business purpose securitization activities (some of which
we consolidate for GAAP purposes), residential and small-balance multifamily bridge loans, as well as third-party investments
including RMBS issued by third parties (including Agency CRT securities), investments in Freddie Mac K-Series multifamily loan
securitizations and reperforming loan securitizations (both of which we consolidate for GAAP purposes), servicer advance
investments, home equity investments, and other housing-related investments. This segment’s main sources of income are net interest
income and other income from investments, changes in fair value of investments, and realized gains and losses upon the sale of
securities. Direct operating expenses and tax provisions associated with these activities are also included in this segment.
76
The following table presents details of our Investment portfolio at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 organized by
investments organically created through our mortgage banking segments and acquired from third-parties. Amounts presented in the
table represent our retained economic investments in consolidated Sequoia, CAFL SFR, Freddie Mac SLST, Freddie Mac K-Series,
Servicing Investment and Point HEI securitizations as noted.
Table 12 – Investment Portfolio - Detail of Economic Interests
(In Thousands)
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Organic Residential Investments
Residential loans at Redwood (1)
Residential securities at Redwood (2)
Residential securities at consolidated Sequoia entities (3)
Other investments
Organic Business Purpose Investments
Bridge loans
Single-family rental securities at consolidated CAFL SFR entities (4)
Other investments
Third-Party Investments
Residential securities at Redwood
Residential securities at consolidated Freddie Mac SLST entities (5)
Multifamily securities at Redwood
Multifamily securities at consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series entities (6)
Servicing investments (7)
HEIs (8)
Other investments
$
172,047 $
143,838
245,417
12,438
944,606
301,506
5,935
195,930
444,751
32,715
31,657
102,540
43,638
10,400
—
155,501
217,965
8,815
641,765
238,630
21,627
134,090
428,179
49,255
28,255
67,766
42,440
19,069
Total Segment Investments
$
2,687,418 $
2,053,357
(1) Balance comprised of loans called from Sequoia securitizations.
(2) Excludes $5 million of trading securities that are designated as hedges for our mortgage banking operations and are not considered part of our
investment portfolio.
(3) Represents our retained economic investment in securities issued by consolidated Sequoia securitization VIEs. For GAAP purposes, we
consolidated $3.63 billion of loans and $3.38 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2021. We consolidated
$1.57 billion of loans and $1.35 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2020.
(4) Represents our retained economic investment in securities issued by consolidated CAFL SFR securitization VIEs. For GAAP purposes, we
consolidated $3.49 billion of loans and $3.21 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2021. We consolidated
$3.25 billion of loans and $3.01 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2020.
(5) Represents our economic investment in securities issued by consolidated Freddie Mac SLST securitization entities. For GAAP purposes, we
consolidated $1.89 billion of loans and $1.45 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2021. We consolidated
$2.22 billion of loans and $1.79 billion of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2020.
(6) Represents our economic investment in securities issued by consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series securitization entities. For GAAP purposes, we
consolidated $474 million of loans and $442 million of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2021. We consolidated
$492 million of loans and $464 million of ABS issued associated with these investments at December 31, 2020.
(7) Represents our economic investment in consolidated Servicing Investment variable interest entities. At December 31, 2021, for GAAP purposes,
we consolidated $385 million of servicing investments and $294 million of non-recourse short-term securitization debt, as well as other assets
and liabilities for these entities. At December 31, 2020, for GAAP purposes, we consolidated $252 million of servicing investments and $208
million of non-recourse short-term securitization debt, as well as other assets and liabilities for these entities.
(8) At December 31, 2021, represents HEIs owned at Redwood of $33 million and our retained economic investment in securities issued by the
consolidated Point HEI entity of $10 million. At December 31, 2021, for GAAP purposes, we consolidated $160 million of HEIs and $137
million of ABS issued, as well as other assets and liabilities for this entity. At December 31, 2020, represents HEIs owned at Redwood.
77
The growth in our investment portfolio during 2021 was primarily attributable to a net increase in business purpose bridge loans,
the acquisition of residential jumbo loans from calls, incremental investments in HEI through our Point flow agreement, incremental
servicing investments, additional securities retained from CAFL securitizations and incremental investments in agency CRT. See the
"Investments Detail and Activity" section that follows for additional detail on our portfolio investments and their associated
borrowings.
The following table presents an earnings summary for our Investment Portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020 and 2019.
Table 13 – Investment Portfolio Earnings Summary
(In Thousands)
Net interest income
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Operating expenses
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
Segment Contribution
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
155,538 $
150,479 $
165,331
129,614
10,021
17,993
(16,074)
(3,862)
(586,204)
(1,725)
5,242
(10,779)
4,104
$
293,230 $
(438,883) $
37,293
11,407
23,821
(12,037)
(2,419)
223,396
In the preceding Results of Operations by Segment – Overview section, we discussed the major factors impacting the change in net
income (segment contribution) from our Investment Portfolio segment from 2019 to 2021. Additionally, the preceding Net Interest
Income – Net Interest Income by Segment section, we discussed the major factors impacting the change in net interest income from our
Investment Portfolio segment. Following, we provide additional detail on the changes in segment contribution from 2020 to 2021.
Investment fair value changes is primarily comprised of the change in fair value of our portfolio investments (both realized and
unrealized) accounted for under the fair value option and, prior to the second quarter of 2020, interest rate hedges associated with
these investments (see Table 5.6 in Note 5 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail on the composition
of investment fair value changes – note difference in amount from the table above to Table 5.6 in the notes to our consolidated
financial statements relates to fair value changes for investments held at corporate/other). During 2021, positive investment fair value
changes reflected improved credit performance and spread tightening across our investment portfolio. In addition to our excess MSR
investments, we also own interest only securities within our trading securities, and in consolidated Sequoia, Freddie Mac SLST, and
CAFL entities. As a matter of course, we record negative fair value changes for these investments each quarter, which represent a
reduction in the basis of these assets as we receive regular cash interest payments. In addition to these baseline negative fair value
changes for these assets, we incurred incremental negative fair value changes for these investments in 2021 as a result of increasing
prepayment speeds for the loans underlying these investments.
The negative investment fair value changes recorded during 2020 were primarily driven by realized losses incurred on assets sales
and derivative settlements that occurred in March and April of that year, as we repositioned our portfolio in response to disruptions
following the onset of the pandemic. Approximately $360 million of losses were realized from such sales. The remaining net losses for
the year were primarily associated with assets we retained that experienced a significant decline in value during the first quarter of
2020 and had not fully recovered their value through the end of that year, as well as a negative fair value changes on our interest only
securities resulting from lower benchmark interest rates and higher prepayment speeds during 2020. The $59 million of losses from
risk management derivatives in 2020 were realized in the first quarter of that year, when we settled all of the hedges for this portfolio.
During 2019, the positive investment fair value changes primarily resulted from tightening credit spreads in several investment
classes.
Other income within this segment is primarily comprised of income (loss) from our MSR investments, bridge loan fees, risk share
investment income and FHLBC capital stock dividends. Details on the composition of Other income is included in Note 20 in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The change in this line item from 2020 to 2021 and 2019 to 2020, was primarily driven
by positive $12 million and negative $13 million, respectively, of changes in MSR Income (loss), mostly attributable to negative fair
value changes for these investments in 2020, when prepayment speeds rose sharply after the onset of the pandemic when benchmark
interest rates declined.
78
In 2021, we realized gains of $18 million, including $16 million of gains resulting from calls of seven seasoned Sequoia
securitizations, and $1.5 million of net gains from the sale of $11 million of AFS securities. For 2020, realized gains included $5
million of net gains from the sale of $55 million of AFS securities. For 2019, we realized gains of $24 million, primarily from the sale
of $110 million of AFS securities and the call of a seasoned Sequoia securitization in the first quarter.
The increase in operating expenses in 2021 at this segment was primarily attributable to higher general and administrative
expenses resulting from increased accruals of variable compensation expense associated with improved financial results and a higher
headcount in 2021 as compared to 2020, as well as higher long-term incentive award expense from awards granted in the second half
of 2020, including retention related awards, and awards granted in early 2021 as part of our regular annual compensation process.
We hold certain of investments, primarily our MSRs, at our taxable REIT subsidiary. Our provision for (benefit from) income
taxes changes in relation to the amount of income earned from these assets and generally reflects positive income in 2021 and 2019,
and losses in 2020.
Investments Detail and Activity
This section presents additional details on our investment assets and their activity during 2021 and 2020.
Real Estate Securities Portfolio
The following table sets forth our real estate securities activity by collateral type for the years ended December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Table 14 – Real Estate Securities Activity by Collateral Type
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Residential
Multifamily
(In Thousands)
Beginning fair value
Acquisitions
Sequoia securities
Third-party securities
Sales
Sequoia securities
Third-party securities
Gains on sales and calls, net
Effect of principal payments (1)
Change in fair value, net
Ending Fair Value (2)
Senior
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Mezzanine
Total
$
28,464 $
5,663 $
260,743 $
49,255 $
344,125
7,775
962
—
—
—
—
(15,414)
—
—
1,600
58,750
(3,664)
(2,060)
60
(26)
27
—
(33,863)
17,033
(34,365)
53,011
—
8,930
—
—
—
(23,209)
(2,261)
9,375
68,642
(3,664)
(35,923)
17,093
(57,600)
35,363
$
21,787 $
— $
322,909 $
32,715 $
377,411
79
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Residential
Multifamily
(In Thousands)
Beginning fair value
Acquisitions
Sequoia securities
Third-party securities
Sales
Sequoia securities
Third-party securities
Gains on sales and calls, net
Effect of principal payments (1)
Change in fair value, net
Ending Fair Value
Senior
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Mezzanine
Total
$
175,859 $
151,797 $
368,090 $
404,128 $ 1,099,874
49,090
23,229
—
2,000
4,187
27,950
—
59,446
53,277
112,625
(33,375)
(115,354)
3,357
(4,464)
(69,878)
(31,334)
(93,728)
400
(1,015)
(22,457)
(6,394)
—
(71,103)
(91,054)
(287,483)
(587,619)
2,487
(6,803)
(1,604)
(9,625)
4,640
(21,907)
(37,720)
(115,607)
(245,662)
$
28,464 $
5,663 $
260,743 $
49,255 $
344,125
(1) The effect of principal payments reflects the change in fair value due to principal payments, which is calculated as the cash principal received on
a given security during the period multiplied by the prior quarter ending price or acquisition price for that security.
(2) At December 31, 2021, excludes $245 million and $302 million of securities retained from our consolidated Sequoia and CAFL securitizations,
respectively, as well as $445 million and $32 million of securities we owned that were issued by consolidated Freddie Mac SLST and Freddie
Mac K-Series securitizations, respectively.
At December 31, 2021, our securities consisted of fixed-rate assets (90%), adjustable-rate assets (8%) and hybrid assets that reset
within the next year (2%).
The following table sets forth activity in our real estate securities portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2021 organized by
investments organically created through our mortgage banking segments and acquired from third-parties. This table includes both our
securities held on balance sheet and our economic interest in securities we own in securitizations we consolidate in accordance with
GAAP.
Table 15 – Activity of Real Estate Securities Owned at Redwood and in Consolidated Entities
Residential Organic
Business
Purpose
Organic
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Sequoia
Securities on
Balance Sheet
Consolidated
Sequoia
Securities
Consolidated
CAFL
Securities
Third-Party Investments
Consolidated
Multifamily
Securities
Consolidated
SLST
Securities
Other
Third-Party
Securities
Total
Beginning fair value
$ 157,456 $ 217,965 $ 238,630 $ 428,178 $
Acquisitions
Sales
Gains on sales and calls, net
Effect of principal payments (2)
Change in fair value, net
Ending Fair Value (1)
9,375
(3,664)
15,553
16,513
—
—
78,278
—
—
—
—
—
(30,919)
(3,231)
(23,643)
(46,059)
28,255 $ 186,669 $ 1,257,153
172,808
68,642
(47,784)
(35,923)
—
(8,197)
—
—
1,540
17,093
(26,681)
(130,533)
(2,044)
14,170
8,241
62,632
11,599
37,407
132,005
$ 145,757 $ 245,417 $ 301,506 $ 444,751 $
31,657 $ 231,654 $ 1,400,742
(1) At December 31, 2021, $5 million of securities used as hedges for our residential mortgage banking operations are included within the "Sequoia
Securities on balance sheet" and "Other third-party securities" column of this table. These same securities are presented as a component of
securities within our residential lending segment on our segment balance sheet.
(2) The effect of principal payments reflects the change in fair value due to principal payments, which is calculated as the cash principal received on
a given security during the period multiplied by the prior quarter ending price or acquisition price for that security.
During 2021, we retained $78 million of securities from four single-family rental securitizations and $26 million of securities
from nine Sequoia securitizations.
At December 31, 2021, our securities owned at Redwood and in consolidated entities consisted of fixed-rate assets (97%),
adjustable-rate assets (2%), and hybrid assets that reset within the next year (1%).
80
We directly finance our holdings of real estate securities with a combination of non-recourse debt, non-marginable term debt and
marginable debt in the form of repurchase (or “repo”) financing. At December 31, 2021, real estate securities with a fair value of $508
million (including securities owned in consolidated Sequoia and CAFL securitization entities) were financed with long-term, non-
marginable recourse debt through our subordinate securities financing facilities, re-performing loan securities with a fair value of $445
million were financed with $143 million of non-recourse securitization debt, and real estate securities with a fair value of $99 million
(including securities owned in consolidated securitization entities) were financed with $75 million of short-term debt incurred through
repurchase facilities with four different counterparties. The remaining $350 million of securities, including certain securities we own
that were issued by consolidated securitization entities, were financed with capital.
The following table summarizes the credit characteristics of our entire real estate securities portfolio by collateral type at
December 31, 2021. This table includes both our securities held on balance sheet and our economic interest in securities we own in
securitizations we consolidate in accordance with GAAP.
Table 16 – Credit Statistics of Real Estate Securities Owned at Redwood and in Consolidated Entities
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Market
Value -
IO
Securities
Market
Value -
Non-IO
Securities
Principal
Balance -
Non-IO
Securities
Coupon
90+
Delinquency
3-Month
Prepayment
Rate
Investment
Thickness(1)
Weighted Average Values for Non-IO Securities
Sequoia securities on balance sheet
$ 18,215 $ 127,542 $ 151,088
Consolidated Sequoia securities
Total Sequoia Securities
Consolidated Freddie Mac SLST
securities
RPL securities on balance sheet
Total RPL Securities
Consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series
securities
Multifamily securities on balance sheet
Total Multifamily Securities
Consolidated CAFL securities
Other third-party securities
Total Securities
15,483
33,698
229,934
357,476
16,428
428,323
561
65,140
16,989
493,463
247,500
398,588
532,721
143,483
676,204
—
1,330
1,330
54,975
3,050
36,468
31,856
68,324
367,058
151,733
$ 110,042 $ 1,290,700 $ 1,661,907
31,657
31,385
63,042
246,531
130,188
3.7 %
4.6 %
4.3 %
3.1 %
3.4 %
3.2 %
4.1 %
3.5 %
3.8 %
5.1 %
5.2 %
0.54 %
2.06 %
1.50 %
11.08 %
4.38 %
10.19 %
— %
0.03 %
0.01 %
2.14 %
1.16 %
35 %
46 %
42 %
16 %
17 %
16 %
— %
26 %
13 %
12 %
26 %
7 %
34 %
25 %
28 %
8 %
25 %
20 %
7 %
14 %
12 %
4 %
(1)
Investment thickness represents the average size of the subordinate securities we own as investments in securitizations, relative to the average
overall size of the securitizations. For example, if our investment thickness (of first-loss securities) with respect to a particular securitization is
10%, we have exposure to the first 10% of credit losses resulting from loans underlying that securitization. We generally own first loss positions
in Sequoia, RPL and CAFL securities. We own both first loss and mezzanine positions (positions credit enhanced by subordinate securities) in
multifamily and other third-party securities.
81
Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment
The following table provides the activity of bridge loans held-for-investment at Redwood during the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020.
Table 17 – Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment - Activity
(In Thousands)
Fair value at beginning of period
Sales
Transfers between portfolios (1)
Transfers to REO
Principal repayments
Changes in fair value, net
Fair Value at End of Period
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
641,765 $
745,006
(7,000)
962,573
(15,424)
(639,479)
2,171
$
944,606 $
—
423,351
(6,111)
(510,446)
(10,035)
641,765
(1) We originate bridge loans at our TRS and then transfer them to our REIT. Origination fees and any fair value changes on these loans prior to
transfer are recognized within Mortgage banking activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). Once the loans are transferred
to our REIT, they are classified as held-for-investment, with subsequent fair value changes generally recorded through Investment fair value
changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). For bridge loans held at our REIT that are transferred into our CAFL bridge
securitization, we record any changes in fair value from the date of origination or purchase to the time of securitization as Mortgage banking
activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). Once loans are transferred into this securitization, any changes in fair value are
recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Our $945 million of bridge loans held-for-investment at December 31, 2021 were comprised of first-lien, interest-only loans with
a weighted average coupon of 6.95% and original maturities of six to 24 months. At origination, the weighted average FICO score of
borrowers backing these loans was 742 and the weighted average LTV ratio of these loans was 68%. At December 31, 2021, of the
2,774 loans in this portfolio, 28 of these loans with an aggregate fair value of $14 million and an aggregate unpaid principal balance of
$18 million were in foreclosure, of which 31 loans with an aggregate fair value of $14 million and an unpaid principal balance of $18
million were greater than 90 days delinquent.
We finance our bridge loans with a combination of non-recourse securitization debt, and both recourse and non-recourse non-
marginable warehouse facilities. At December 31, 2021, we had $139 million of debt incurred through short-term warehouse facilities
with one different counterparty, which was secured by $167 million of loans, and $459 million of debt incurred through long-term
facilities with three different counterparties, which was secured by $555 million of loans.
We completed a securitization of CoreVest bridge loans in the third quarter of 2021. The ABS issued by this securitization were
backed by assets including $278 million of bridge loans, $15 million of restricted cash, and other assets at December 31, 2021. The
securitization is structured with $300 million of total funding capacity and a feature to allow reinvestment of loan payoffs for the first
30 months of the transaction (through March 2024).
82
Residential Loans
The following table provides the activity of residential loans held at our investment portfolio during the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 18 – Investment Portfolio Residential Loans - Activity
(In Thousands)
Fair value at beginning of period
Acquisitions
Sales
Transfers between portfolios (1)
Principal repayments
Changes in fair value, net
Fair Value at End of Period
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
— $
2,111,897
200,890
—
—
(31,654)
2,812
$
172,048 $
—
(1,254,935)
(533,612)
(229,818)
(93,532)
—
(1) Represents the net transfers of loans into or out of our investment portfolio and their reclassification between held-for-sale to held-for-
investment.
During 2021, we called seven of our unconsolidated Sequoia securitizations and purchased $200 million (unpaid principal
balance) of loans from the securitization trusts.
During 2020, as a result of the economic and financial market disruptions following the onset of the pandemic, we sold all of our
residential loans previously held for investment and financed at our FHLBC facility, and repaid borrowings under this facility. The
negative fair value changes of $93 million recorded in 2020 in association with these loans was effectively realized through their sale.
83
Other Investments
The following table sets forth our other investments activity by significant asset type for the years ended December 31, 2021 and
December 31, 2020.
Table 19 – Other Investments at Investment Portfolio Segment - Activity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
New/additional investments
Sales/distribution
Reductions in investments
Changes in fair value, net
Other
Servicing
Investments(1)
$
231,489 $
Home Equity
Investments(2)
MSRs and
Excess
Servicing
Other
Total
42,440 $
43,233 $
26,563 $
196,583
155,023
24,896
—
343,725
376,502
—
—
(76,223)
(19,396)
—
—
(7,196)
(7,196)
(14,751)
(110,370)
(926)
14,673
—
—
(11,204)
(256)
1,242
77
3,785
(179)
Balance at End of Period
$
350,923 $
192,740 $
56,669 $
5,935 $
606,267
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
New/additional investments
Reductions in investments
Changes in fair value, net
Balance at End of Period
Servicing
Investments(1)
$
169,204 $
Home Equity
Investments(2)
MSRs and
Excess
Servicing
Other
Total
45,085 $
74,037 $
26,002 $
179,419
(107,527)
(9,607)
3,517
(4,269)
(1,893)
10,907
—
(41,711)
8,420
(6,096)
(1,763)
314,328
202,263
(117,892)
(54,974)
$
231,489 $
42,440 $
43,233 $
26,563 $
343,725
(1) Our servicing investments are owned through our consolidated Servicing Investment entities. At December 31, 2021, our economic investment
in these entities was $103 million (for GAAP purposes, we consolidated $385 million of servicing investments, $294 million of non-recourse
short-term securitization debt, as well as other assets and liabilities for these entities). At December 31, 2020, our economic investment in these
entities was $68 million (for GAAP purposes, we consolidated $252 million of servicing investments, $208 million of non-recourse short-term
securitization debt, as well as other assets and liabilities for these entities).
(2) Our home equity investments presented in this table as of December 31, 2021, include $160 million of HEIs owned in our consolidated Point
HEI entity. During the third quarter of 2021, in conjunction with co-sponsoring a securitization of HEIs, we purchased $122 million of
additional HEIs from other contributors to the securitization, then transferred $172 million of HEIs to the Point HEI securitization entity and
issued $146 million of ABS. At December 31, 2021, our economic investment in this entity was $10 million (for GAAP purposes, we
consolidated $160 million of HEIs and $137 million of ABS issued, as well as other assets and liabilities for this entity).
Reductions in investments for our servicing investments primarily represent recoveries of servicing advances within our
consolidated servicing VIEs. Positive changes in fair value for Home Equity Investments in 2021 primarily reflect an increase in the
value of our HEIs that was established upon the completion of our co-sponsored Point HEI securitization. Changes in fair value for
MSRs and excess servicing represent both a reduction in basis from the regular receipt of scheduled cash flows, as well as a negative
impact to fair value from increased prepayment speeds experienced in 2020 and 2021.
Additional details on our other investments is included in Note 10 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
84
Income Taxes
Taxable Income, REIT Status and Dividend Characterization
As a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code, Redwood is required to distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its annual REIT
taxable income, excluding net capital gains, and meet certain other requirements that relate to, among other matters, the assets it holds,
the income it generates, and the composition of its stockholders. To the extent Redwood retains REIT taxable income, including net
capital gains, it is taxed at corporate tax rates. Redwood also earns taxable income at its taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS), which it is
not required to distribute under the Internal Revenue Code.
In December 2021, our Board of Directors declared a regular dividend of $0.23 per share for the fourth quarter of 2021, which
was paid on December 28, 2021 to shareholders of record on December 17, 2021. At December 31, 2021, our full-year dividend
distributions of $0.78 per share exceeded our minimum distribution requirements and we believe that we have met all requirements for
qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Many requirements for qualification as a REIT are complex and require
analysis of particular facts and circumstances. Often there is only limited judicial or administrative interpretive guidance and as such
there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or courts would agree with our various tax positions. If we were to fail to
meet all the requirements for qualification as a REIT and the requirements for statutory relief, we would be subject to federal corporate
income tax on our taxable income and we would not be able to elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years thereafter. Such an outcome
could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.
While our minimum REIT dividend requirement is generally 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, we carried a $37 million
federal net operating loss carry forward (NOL) into 2021 at our REIT that affords us the ability to retain REIT taxable income up to
the NOL amount, tax free, rather than distributing it as dividends. Federal income tax rules require the dividends paid deduction to be
applied to reduce REIT taxable income before the applicability of NOLs is considered; therefore, REIT taxable income must exceed
our dividend distribution for us to utilize a portion of our NOL and any remaining NOL amount will carry forward into future years.
The tax basis in assets and liabilities at the REIT was $3.28 billion and $1.86 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2021. The
GAAP basis in assets and liabilities at the REIT was $11.87 billion and $10.60 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2021. The
primary difference in both the tax and GAAP assets and liabilities is attributable to securitization entities that are consolidated for
GAAP reporting purposes but not for tax purposes.
Our 2021 dividend distributions are expected to be characterized for federal income tax purposes as 74% ordinary dividend
income and 26% qualified dividends. Under the federal income tax rules applicable to REITs, none of the 2021 dividend distributions
are expected to be characterized as a return of capital or long-term capital gain dividend income. The income or loss generated at our
TRS does not directly affect the tax characterization of our 2021 dividends; however, any dividends paid from our TRS to our REIT
allows a portion of our REIT’s dividends to be classified as qualified dividends.
Tax Provision under GAAP
For the years ended months ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, we recorded a tax provision of $18 million, a tax benefit
of $5 million and a tax provision of $7 million, respectively. Our tax provision is primarily derived from the activities at our TRS as
we do not book a material tax provision associated with income generated at our REIT. Our TRS income is generally earned from our
mortgage banking activities, MSRs, and other non-REIT eligible security investments. While our TRS effective tax rate in the prior
year approximated the federal statutory corporate tax rate (due to state NOL carryforwards), for 2021 it increased (exclusive of the
valuation allowance release) due to California’s temporary suspension of net operating loss carryforwards.
Realization of our deferred tax assets ("DTAs") is dependent on many factors, including generating sufficient taxable income
prior to the expiration of NOL carryforwards and generating sufficient capital gains in future periods prior to the expiration of capital
loss carryforwards. We determine the extent to which realization of our DTAs is not assured and establish a valuation allowance
accordingly. At December 31, 2020, we reported net federal ordinary and capital DTAs, with a full valuation allowance of $17 million
recorded against our net federal ordinary DTAs based on our determination that their realization was not assured, and no valuation
allowance recorded against our net federal capital DTAs as we expected to utilize these DTAs. At December 31, 2020, we reported a
valuation allowance of $134 million recorded against our net state DTAs.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we reassessed the valuation allowance noting the increase in positive evidence related to
our ability to utilize certain deferred tax assets. The positive evidence includes significant revenue growth and expectations regarding
future profitability at our TRS. After assessing both the positive evidence and negative evidence, we determined it was more likely
than not that we will realize all of our federal deferred tax assets. Therefore, we reversed our federal valuation allowance of $17
million as a discrete benefit in the third quarter of 2021. In addition to the federal valuation allowance release, we determined it was
85
more likely than not that we will realize a portion of our state deferred assets and, as such, reversed $3 million of state valuation
allowance as a discrete item in the third quarter of 2021. Consistent with prior periods, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance
against the majority of our net state DTAs as realization of our state DTAs is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the
same jurisdictions in which the DTAs exist and we project most of our state DTAs will expire prior to their utilization.
The following table details our federal NOLs and capital loss carryforwards available as of December 31, 2021.
Table 20 - Federal Net Operating and Capital Loss Carryforwards
(In Thousands)
REIT Loss Carryforwards
Net operating loss
Capital loss
Total REIT Loss Carryforwards
TRS Loss Carryforwards
Net operating loss
Capital loss
Total TRS Loss Carryforwards
California Combined Loss
Carryforwards
Net operating loss
Capital loss
Total California Combined Loss
Carryforwards
$
$
$
$
$
$
Loss Carryforward Expiration by Period
1 to 3
Years
3 to 5
Years
5 to 15
Years
After 15
No
Years
Expiration
Total
— $
— $
(28,684) $
— $
(8,757) $
(37,441)
—
(302,382)
—
—
—
(302,382)
— $ (302,382) $
(28,684) $
— $
(8,757) $ (339,823)
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
(182) $
(208) $
(390)
—
—
—
—
— $
(182) $
(208) $
(390)
— $
— $ (1,090,695) $
(53,815) $
— $ (1,144,510)
—
(211,151)
—
—
—
(211,151)
— $ (211,151) $ (1,090,695) $
(53,815) $
— $ (1,355,661)
86
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Summary
In addition to the proceeds from equity and debt capital-raising transactions, our principal sources of cash and liquidity consist of
borrowings under mortgage loan warehouse facilities, secured term financing facilities, securities repurchase agreements, payments of
principal and interest we receive from our investment portfolio assets, proceeds from the sale of investment portfolio assets, and cash
generated from our operating activities. Our most significant uses of cash are to purchase and originate mortgage loans for our
mortgage banking operations and manage hedges associated with those activities, to purchase investment securities and make other
investments, to repay principal and interest on our debt, to meet margin calls associated with our debt and other obligations, to make
dividend payments on our capital stock, and to fund our operations.
At December 31, 2021, our total capital was $2.04 billion and included $1.39 billion of equity capital and $652 million of
convertible notes and long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet, including $199 million of convertible debt due in 2023, $150
million of convertible debt due in 2024, $172 million of exchangeable debt due in 2025, and $140 million of trust-preferred securities
due in 2037.
As of December 31, 2021, our unrestricted cash was $450 million, and we estimate we had approximately $150 million of capital
available for investment. While we believe our available cash is sufficient to fund our operations, we may raise equity or debt capital
from time to time to increase our unrestricted cash and liquidity, to repay existing debt, to make long-term portfolio investments, to
fund strategic acquisitions and investments, or for other purposes. To the extent we seek to raise additional capital, our approach will
continue to be based on what we believe to be in the best interests of the company and our shareholders.
In the discussion that follows and throughout this document, we distinguish between marginable and non-marginable debt. When
we refer to non-marginable debt and marginable debt, we are referring to whether such debt is subject to market value-based margin
calls on underlying collateral that is non-delinquent. If a mortgage loan is financed under a marginable warehouse facility, to the
extent the market value of the loan declines (which market value is generally determined by the counterparty under the facility), we
will be subject to a margin call, meaning we will be required to either immediately reacquire the loan or meet a margin requirement to
pledge additional collateral, such as cash or additional residential loans, in an amount at least equal to the decline in value. Non-
marginable debt may be subject to a margin call due to delinquency of the mortgage or security being financed, or a decline in the
value of the underlying asset securing the collateral. For example, we could be subject to a margin call on non-marginable debt if an
appraisal or broker price opinion indicates a decline in the value of the property securing the mortgage loan that is financed by us
under a loan warehouse facility.
We also distinguish between recourse and non-recourse debt. When we refer to non-recourse debt, we mean debt that is payable
solely from the assets pledged to secure such debt, and under which debt, no creditor or lender has direct or indirect recourse to us, or
any other entity or person (except for customary exceptions for fraud, acts of insolvency, or other "bad acts"), if such assets are
inadequate or unavailable to pay off such debt.
We are subject to risks relating to our liquidity and capital resources, including risks relating to incurring debt under residential
loan warehouse facilities, securities repurchase facilities, and other short- and long-term debt facilities and other risks relating to our
use of derivatives. A further discussion of these risks is set forth below under the heading “Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under
Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities" and in Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Repurchase Authorization
In February 2018, our Board of Directors approved an authorization for the repurchase of our common stock, increasing the total
amount authorized for repurchases of common stock to $100 million, and also authorized the repurchase of outstanding debt securities,
including convertible and exchangeable debt. This authorization increased the previous share repurchase authorization approved in
February 2016 and has no expiration date. This repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares
or securities. Under this authorization, shares or securities may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions,
including under plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. During the year ended
December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization. During the year ended
December 31, 2020, we repurchased 3,047,335 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization for $22 million. At
December 31, 2021, $78 million of the current authorization remained available for the repurchase of shares of our common stock and
we also continued to be authorized to repurchase outstanding debt securities. Like other investments we may make, any repurchases of
our common stock or debt securities under this authorization would reduce our available capital and unrestricted cash described above.
87
Cash Flows and Liquidity for the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Cash flows from our mortgage banking activities and our investments can be volatile from quarter to quarter depending on many
factors, including the timing and amount of loan originations, acquisitions, sales and profitability within our mortgage banking
operations, the timing and amount of securities acquisitions, sales and repayments, as well as changes in interest rates, prepayments,
and credit losses. Therefore, cash flows generated in the current period are not necessarily reflective of the long-term cash flows we
will receive from these operations or investments.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities were negative $5.69 billion in 2021. This amount includes the net cash utilized during the
period from the purchase and sale of residential mortgage loans and the origination and sale of our business purpose loans associated
with our mortgage banking activities. Purchases of loans are financed to a large extent with short-term and long-term debt, for which
changes in cash are included as a component of financing activities. Excluding cash flows from the purchase, origination, sale, and
principal payments of loans classified as held-for-sale, cash flows from operating activities were positive $28 million in 2021, positive
$91 million in 2020, and negative $76 million in 2019.
As presented in the "Supplemental Noncash Information" subsection of our consolidated statements of cash flows, during 2021,
2020, and 2019, we transferred loans between held-for-sale and held-for-investment classification, retained securities from Sequoia
and CAFL securitizations we sponsored, which represent significant non-cash transactions that were not included in cash flows from
operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During 2021, our net cash provided by investing activities was $1.40 billion and primarily resulted from proceeds from principal
payments on loans and real estate securities. Although we generally intend to hold our investment securities and loans as long-term
investments, we may sell certain of these assets in order to manage our liquidity needs and interest rate risk, to meet other operating
objectives, and to adapt to market conditions.
Because many of our investment securities and loans are financed through various borrowing agreements, a significant portion of
the proceeds from any sales or principal payments of these assets are generally used to repay balances under these financing sources.
Similarly, all or a significant portion of cash flows from principal payments of loans, securities and HEIs at consolidated securitization
entities would generally be used to repay ABS issued by those entities.
As presented in the "Supplemental Noncash Information" subsection of our consolidated statements of cash flows, during 2021,
2020, and 2019, we transferred residential loans between held-for-sale and held-for-investment classification, retained securities from
Sequoia, CAFL, and HEI-backed securitizations we sponsored, consolidated certain multifamily and re-performing residential
securitization trusts, and deconsolidated certain multifamily securitization trusts, which represent significant non-cash transactions that
were not included in cash flows from investing activities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During 2021, our net cash provided by financing activities was $4.28 billion. This primarily resulted from $2.48 billion of net
issuance of asset-backed securities and $1.83 billion of net borrowings under short-term debt facilities. During the year ended
December 31, 2021, we declared dividends of $0.78 per common share. On December 7, 2021, the Board of Directors declared a
regular dividend of $0.23 per share for the fourth quarter of 2021, which was paid on December 28, 2021 to shareholders of record on
December 17, 2021.
In accordance with the terms of our outstanding deferred stock units and restricted stock units, which are stock-based
compensation awards, each time we declare and pay a dividend on our common stock, we are required to make a dividend equivalent
payment in that same per share amount on each outstanding deferred stock unit, cash-settled deferred stock unit, and restricted stock
unit.
88
Cash Flows and Liquidity for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
During 2020, in response to disruptions following the onset of the pandemic, we sold a significant amount of investments and
repaid a significant amount of debt, which allowed us to reposition and de-lever our balance sheet and generate additional liquidity.
Additionally, we entered into several new financing agreements that are non-marginable (i.e., not subject to margin calls based on the
market value of the underlying, non-delinquent collateral) and non-recourse, and have longer dated maturities than agreements they
replaced that were marginable and recourse to us. While the asset sales and pay-downs of debt, along with the new financing
agreements, strengthened our liquidity and capital position by removing sources of contingent liquidity risk (from potential market
value-based margin calls on non-delinquent collateral), they also reduced our overall amount of earning assets and in some cases
increased our borrowing costs.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities were negative $505 million in 2020. This amount includes the net cash utilized during the
period from the purchase and sale of residential mortgage loans and the origination and sale of our business purpose loans associated
with our mortgage banking activities. Purchases of loans are financed to a large extent with short-term and long-term debt, for which
changes in cash are included as a component of financing activities. Excluding cash flows from the purchase, origination, sale, and
principal payments of loans classified as held-for-sale, cash flows from operating activities were positive $91 million in 2020, negative
$76 million in 2019, and positive $100 million in 2018.
In response to disruptions following the onset of the pandemic, in late March 2020 we determined that our hedges were no longer
effectively managing the risks associated with certain of our assets and liabilities and we settled nearly all of our outstanding
derivative positions. As a result of these settlements and other hedging activity during the quarter, we made $187 million of cash
payments. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2020, our margin receivable (which was primarily associated with our
hedges), decreased by $207 million, resulting in an increase to our cash flows from operations. These changes in operating cash flows
resulted from actions taken in response to disruptions following the onset of the pandemic that we would generally not expect to recur
at such a magnitude in subsequent periods. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2020, we received $38 million in cash
related to FHLBC stock that was redeemed, upon the repayment of substantially all of our borrowings from the FHLBC.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During 2020, our net cash provided by investing activities was $4.07 billion and primarily resulted from proceeds from sales of
loans and real estate securities, as well as principal payments on loans. Although we generally intend to hold our loans and investment
securities as long-term investments, we may sell certain of these assets in order to manage our liquidity needs and interest rate risk, to
meet other operating objectives, and to adapt to market conditions.
Because many of our investment securities and loans are financed through various borrowing agreements, a significant portion of
the proceeds from any sales or principal payments of these assets are generally used to repay balances under these financing sources.
Similarly, all or a significant portion of cash flows from principal payments of loans at consolidated securitization entities would
generally be used to repay ABS issued by those entities.
As presented in the "Supplemental Noncash Information" subsection of our consolidated statements of cash flows, during 2020,
2019, and 2018, we transferred residential loans between held-for-sale and held-for-investment classification, retained securities from
Sequoia and CAFL securitizations we sponsored, consolidated certain multifamily and re-performing residential securitization trusts,
and deconsolidated certain multifamily securitization trusts, which represent significant non-cash transactions that were not included
in cash flows from investing activities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During 2020, our net cash used in financing activities was $3.31 billion. This primarily resulted from $1.81 billion of net
repayments of short-term debt and $2.97 billion of repayments of long-term debt, including repayments of $2.00 billion of FHLBC
borrowings, which were associated with the sales of a significant amount of assets noted in the investing activities section above.
Additionally, we paid $97 million to purchase and retire $125 million of our convertible debt in the second quarter of 2020, and
repurchased $22 million of stock in the third quarter. These outflows of cash were partially offset by $191 million of net proceeds
from the issuance and settlements of ABS issued. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we had cash inflows of
$1.47 billion related to borrowings under three new non-marginable facilities that were generally used to repay existing borrowings
from marginable facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we declared dividends of $0.725 per common share.
89
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our contractual obligations and commitments at December 31, 2021, as well as the obligations of the
securitization entities that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes.
Table 21 – Contractual Obligations and Commitments
December 31, 2021
(In Millions)
Obligations of Redwood
Short-term debt
Convertible notes
Anticipated interest payments on convertible notes
Other long-term debt
Anticipated interest payments on other long-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Operating leases
Total Redwood Obligations and Commitments
Obligations of Consolidated Securitization Entities for
Financial Reporting Purposes(1)
Consolidated ABS (2)
Anticipated interest payments on ABS (3)
Non-recourse short-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Total Obligations of Securitization Entities Consolidated
for Financial Reporting Purposes
Payments Due or Commitment Expiration by Period
3 to 5
Years
After 5
Years
1 to 3
Years
Less Than
1 Year
Total
$
1,883 $
— $
— $
— $
1,883
—
28
—
29
14
4
349
46
796
58
—
9
172
10
194
18
—
7
—
—
140
59
—
4
521
84
1,130
164
14
24
$
1,958 $
1,258 $
401 $
203 $
3,820
$
— $
— $
— $
8,970 $
315
295
25
635
595
—
—
595
494
—
—
494
1,571
—
—
8,970
2,975
295
25
10,541
12,265
Total Consolidated Obligations and Commitments
$
2,593 $
1,853 $
895 $
10,744 $
16,085
(1) Obligations of consolidated securitization entities are not legal obligations of Redwood and do not represent contractual obligations requiring
cash or liquidity from Redwood.
(2) All consolidated ABS issued are collateralized by real estate loans or other real estate-related assets. Although the stated maturity is as shown,
the ABS obligations will pay down as the principal balances of these real estate loans or securities pay down. The amount shown is the principal
balance of the ABS issued and not necessarily the value reported in our consolidated financial statements.
(3) The anticipated interest payments on consolidated ABS issued are calculated based on the contractual maturity of the ABS and therefore
assumes no prepayments of the principal outstanding at December 31, 2021.
In the normal course of business we engage in financial transactions that may not be recorded on the balance sheet. For additional
information on our commitments and contingencies, refer to Note 16 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Several of our loan warehouse facilities were established with initial one-year terms and are regularly amended on an annual basis
to extend the terms for an additional year ahead of their maturity. We have several such facilities with scheduled maturities in 2022,
and, while there is no assurance of our ability to amend these facilities, market conditions for these types of facilities remain favorable
and we would expect to extend these in the normal course of business. Aside from these facilities, we expect to meet our obligations
coming due in less than one year from December 31, 2021, through a combination of cash on hand, payments of principal and interest
we receive from our investment portfolio assets, proceeds from the sale of investment portfolio assets, cash generated from our
operating activities, or incremental borrowings under existing, new or amended financing facilities.
During 2021, the highest balance of our short-term debt outstanding was $2.77 billion. See Note 13 in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our short-term debt.
90
Liquidity Needs for our Mortgage Banking Activities
We generally use loan warehouse facilities to finance the residential loans we acquire and the business purpose loans we originate
or acquire in our mortgage banking operations while we aggregate the loans for sale or securitization. These facilities may be
designated as short-term or long-term for financial reporting purposes, depending on the remaining maturity of the facility or the
amount of time individual borrowings may remain outstanding on a facility.
At December 31, 2021, we had residential loan warehouse facilities outstanding with seven different counterparties, with $2.90
billion of total capacity and $1.23 billion of available capacity. These included non-marginable facilities with $1.38 billion of total
capacity and marginable facilities with $1.52 billion of total capacity.
At December 31, 2021, we had business purpose loan warehouse facilities outstanding with four different counterparties, with
$1.65 billion of total capacity and $0.9 billion of available capacity. All of these facilities are non-marginable.
As discussed above, several of the facilities we use to finance our mortgage banking loan inventory are short-term in nature and
will require renewals. Additionally, because several of our warehouse facilities are uncommitted, at any given time we may not be
able to obtain additional financing under them when we need it, exposing us to, among other things, liquidity risks. Additional
information regarding risks related to the debt we use to finance our mortgage banking operations can be found under the heading
"Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities" that follows within this section.
Liquidity Needs for our Investment Portfolio
We use various forms of secured recourse and non-recourse debt to finance assets in our investment portfolio. We distinguish our
debt between recourse and non-recourse, as our non-recourse debt is mostly comprised of ABS issued, which has unique
characteristics that differentiate it in important ways from our recourse debt. When we refer to non-recourse debt, we mean debt that is
payable solely from the assets pledged to secure such debt, and under which debt no creditor or lender has direct or indirect recourse to
us, or any other entity or person (except for customary exceptions for fraud, acts of insolvency, or other "bad acts"), if such assets are
inadequate or unavailable to pay off such debt.
ABS issued represents debt of securitization entities that we consolidate for GAAP reporting purposes. Our exposure to these
entities is primarily through the financial interests we have purchased or retained from these entities (typically subordinate securities
and interest only securities) . Each securitization entity is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and liabilities are
not owned by and are not legal obligations of Redwood. As the debt issued by these entities is not a direct obligation of Redwood, and
since the debt generally can remain outstanding for the full term of the loans it is financing within each securitization, this debt
effectively provides permanent financing for these assets. See Note 4 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for
additional information on our principals of consolidation and Note 14 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for
additional information on our asset-backed securities issued.
Separately, we use non-recourse debt in the form of non-marginable term facilities to finance a portion of our business purpose
bridge loan portfolio. While this debt is non-recourse to Redwood, it does have fixed terms with prepayment options that allows us to
refinance this debt or ultimately repay it upon maturity. The remainder of the debt we use to finance our investments is recourse debt.
For securities we have financed, the majority of our financing is in the form of recourse non-marginable secured term debt, with the
smaller remaining amount being marginable securities repurchase debt. Additionally, a portion of our business purpose bridge loan
portfolio is financed with recourse non-marginable secured term debt.
At December 31, 2021, in aggregate, we had $3.19 billion of secured recourse debt outstanding, financing our investment
portfolio, of which $887 million was marginable and $2.30 billion was non-marginable.
91
Corporate Capital
In addition to secured recourse and non-recourse leverage we use specifically in association with our mortgage banking operations
and within our investment portfolio, we also use unsecured recourse debt to finance our overall operations. This is generally in the
form of convertible debt securities we issue in the public markets and also includes trust preferred securities. See Note 15 in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information on our long-term debt.
Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities
As described above under the heading “Results of Operations,” in the ordinary course of our business, we use debt financing
obtained through several different types of borrowing facilities to, among other things, finance the acquisition and/or origination of
residential and business purpose mortgage loans (including those we acquire and/or originate in anticipation of sale or securitization),
and finance investments in securities and other investments. We may also use short- and long-term borrowings to fund other aspects of
our business and operations, including the repurchase of shares of our common stock. Debt incurred under these facilities is generally
either the direct obligation of Redwood Trust, Inc., or the direct obligation of subsidiaries of Redwood Trust, Inc. and guaranteed by
Redwood Trust, Inc.
Residential and Business Purpose Loan Warehouse Facilities. One source of our debt financing is secured borrowings under loan
warehouse facilities. These facilities may be designated as short-term or long-term for financial reporting purposes, depending on the
remaining maturity of the facility or the amount of time individual borrowings may remain outstanding on a facility. Residential loan
warehouse facilities were in place with seven different financial institution counterparties as of December 31, 2021. In addition, as of
December 31, 2021, we had business purpose loan warehouse facilities secured by single-family rental loans and bridge loans, in place
with four financial institution counterparties. Under our residential loan warehouse facilities, we had an aggregate borrowing limit of
$2.90 billion at December 31, 2021, and under our business purpose loan warehouse facilities we had an aggregate borrowing limit of
$1.7 billion at December 31, 2021. However, several of these facilities are uncommitted, which means that any request we make to
borrow funds under these facilities may be declined for any reason, even if at the time of the borrowing request we have then-
outstanding borrowings that are less than the borrowing limits under these facilities. Financing for residential or business purpose
mortgage loans is obtained under these facilities by our transfer of mortgage loans to the counterparty in exchange for cash proceeds
(in an amount less than 100% of the principal amount of the transferred mortgage loans), and our covenant to reacquire those loans
from the counterparty for the same amount plus a financing charge.
In order to obtain financing for a residential or business purpose loan under these facilities, the loan must initially (and
continuously while the financing remains outstanding) meet certain eligibility criteria, including, without limitation, that the loan is not
in a delinquent status, except that certain loan facilities may allow a loan to continue to be financed if it becomes delinquent, if it
meets specified conditions. In addition, under these warehouse facilities, residential or business purpose loans can only be financed for
a maximum period, which period may be limited to 364 days for our short-term warehouse facilities. We generally intend to repay the
financing of a loan under one of these facilities at or prior to the expiration of that financing with the proceeds of a securitization or
other sale of that loan, through the proceeds of other short-term or long-term borrowings, or with other equity or long-term debt
capital.
Our warehouse facilities may be marginable or non-marginable. When we refer to non-marginable debt and marginable debt, we
are referring to whether such debt is subject to market value-based margin calls on underlying collateral that is non-delinquent. If a
mortgage loan is financed under a marginable warehouse facility, to the extent the market value of the loan declines (which market
value is generally determined by the counterparty under the facility), we will be subject to a margin call, meaning we will be required
to either immediately reacquire the loan or meet a margin requirement to pledge additional collateral, such as cash or additional
residential loans, in an amount at least equal to the decline in value. Some of our non-marginable warehouse facilities may be subject
to a margin call due to delinquency of the mortgage or security being financed, or a decline in the value of the asset securing the
collateral. For example, under certain agreements, we could be subject to a margin call on non-marginable debt if an appraisal or
broker price opinion indicates a decline in the value of the property securing the mortgage loan that is financed by us under a loan
warehouse facility. See further discussion below under the heading “Margin Call Provisions Associated with Short-Term Debt and
Other Debt Financing.”
92
Because several of these warehouse facilities are uncommitted, at any given time we may not be able to obtain additional
financing under them when we need it, exposing us to, among other things, liquidity risks of the types described in Part I, Item 1A of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
under the heading “Market Risks.” In addition, with respect to residential or business purpose loans that at any given time are already
being financed through these warehouse facilities, we are exposed to market, credit, liquidity, and other risks of the types described in
Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K under the heading “Market Risks,” if and when those loans become ineligible to be financed, decline in value, or have
been financed for the maximum term permitted under the applicable facility.
Under our residential and business purpose loan warehouse facilities, we also make various representations and warranties and
have agreed to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms that if breached or triggered can result in our being required to
immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to use for future
financing needs. In particular, the terms of these facilities include financial covenants, cross-default provisions, judgment default
provisions, and other events of default (such as, for example, events of default triggered by one of the following: a change in control
over Redwood, regulatory investigation or enforcement action against Redwood, Redwood’s failure to continue to qualify as a REIT
for tax purposes, or Redwood’s failure to maintain the listing of its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange). Under a cross-
default provision, an event of default is triggered (and the warehouse facility becomes unavailable and outstanding amounts borrowed
thereunder become due and payable) if an event of default or similar event occurs under another borrowing or credit facility we
maintain in excess of a specified amount. Under a judgment default provision, an event of default is triggered (and the warehouse
facility becomes unavailable and outstanding amounts borrowed thereunder become due and payable) if a judgment for damages in
excess of a specified amount is entered against us in any litigation and we are unable to promptly satisfy, bond, or obtain a stay of the
judgment. Financial covenants included in these warehouse facilities are further described below under the heading “Financial
Covenants Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing.”
These residential and business purpose loan warehouse facilities could also become unavailable and outstanding amounts
borrowed thereunder could become immediately due and payable if there is a material adverse change in our business. If we breach or
trigger the representations and warranties, covenants, events of default, or other terms of our warehouse facilities, we are exposed to
liquidity and other risks, including of the type described in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading
“Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Market Risks.”
In addition to the residential and business purpose loan warehouse facilities described above, in the ordinary course of business
we may seek to establish additional warehouse facilities that may be of a similar or greater size and may have similar or more
restrictive terms. In the event a counterparty to one or more of our warehouse facilities becomes insolvent or unable or unwilling to
perform its obligations under the facility, we may be unable to access short-term financing we need or fail to recover the full value of
our mortgage loans financed.
Securities Repurchase Facilities. Another source of short-term debt financing is through securities repurchase facilities we have
established with various different financial institution counterparties. Under these facilities we do not have an aggregate borrowing
limit; however, these facilities are uncommitted, which means that any request we make to borrow funds under these facilities may be
declined for any reason. Short-term financing for securities is obtained under these facilities by our transfer of securities to the
counterparty in exchange for cash proceeds (in an amount less than 100% of the fair value of the transferred securities), and our
covenant to reacquire those securities from the counterparty for the same amount plus a financing charge.
Under these securities repurchase facilities, securities are financed for a fixed period, which would not generally exceed 90 days.
We generally intend to repay the short-term financing of a security under one of these facilities through a renewal of that financing
with the same counterparty, through a sale of the security, or with other equity or long-term debt capital. While a security is financed
under a securities repurchase facility, to the extent the market value of the security declines (which market value is generally
determined by the counterparty under the facility), we are required to either immediately reacquire the security or meet a margin
requirement to pledge additional collateral, such as cash or U.S. Treasury securities, in an amount at least equal to the decline in value.
See further discussion below under the heading “Margin Call Provisions Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt
Financing.”
At the end of the fixed period applicable to the financing of a security under a securities repurchase facility, if we intend to
continue to obtain financing for that security we would typically request the same counterparty to renew the financing for an additional
fixed period. If the same counterparty does not renew the financing, it may be difficult for us to obtain financing for that security
under one of our other securities repurchase facilities, due to the fact that the financial institution counterparties to our securities
repurchase facilities generally only provide financing for securities that we purchased from them or one of their affiliates.
93
Because our securities repurchase facilities are uncommitted, at any given time we may not be able to obtain additional financing
under them when we need it, exposing us to, among other things, liquidity risks of the types described in Part I, Item 1A of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
heading “Market Risks.” In addition, with respect to securities that at any given time are already being financed through our securities
repurchase facilities, we are exposed to market, credit, liquidity, and other risks of the types described in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
heading “Market Risks,” if and when those securities decline in value, or have been financed for the maximum term permitted under
the applicable facility.
Under our securities repurchase facilities, we also make various representations and warranties and have agreed to certain
covenants, events of default, and other terms (including of the type described above under the heading “Residential and Business
Purpose Loan Warehouse Facilities”) that if breached or triggered can result in our being required to immediately repay all
outstanding amounts borrowed under these facilities and these facilities being unavailable to use for future financing needs. In
particular, the terms of these facilities include financial covenants, cross-default provisions, judgment default provisions, and other
events of default (including of the type described above under the heading “Residential and Business Purpose Loan Warehouse
Facilities”). Financial covenants included in our repurchase facilities are further described below under the heading “Financial
Covenants Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing.”
Our securities repurchase facilities could also become unavailable and outstanding amounts borrowed thereunder could become
immediately due and payable if there is a material adverse change in our business. If we breach or trigger the representations and
warranties, covenants, events of default, or other terms of our securities repurchase facilities, we are exposed to liquidity and other
risks, including of the type described in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in
Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Market Risks.”
In the ordinary course of business we may seek to establish additional securities repurchase facilities that may have similar or
more restrictive terms. In the event a counterparty to one or more of our securities repurchase facilities becomes insolvent or unable or
unwilling to perform its obligations under the facility, we may be unable to access the short-term financing we need or fail to recover
the full value of our securities financed.
Other Short-Term Debt Facility. We also maintain a $10 million committed line of short-term credit from a bank, which is
secured by our pledge of certain mortgage-backed securities we own. At December 31, 2021, the securities pledged to secure this
credit line had a fair market value of $1 million, thereby limiting our ability to fully utilize this facility until we pledge additional
assets to this lender. This bank line of credit is an additional source of short-term financing for us. Similar to the uncommitted
warehouse and securities repurchase facilities described herein, under this committed line we make various representations and
warranties and have agreed to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms that if breached or triggered can result in our being
required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under this facility and this facility being unavailable to use for future
financing needs. The margin call provisions and financial covenants included in this committed line are further described below under
the headings “Margin Call Provisions Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing” and “Financial Covenants
Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing.” When we use this committed line to incur short-term debt we are
exposed to the market, credit, liquidity, and other types of risks described above with respect to residential loan warehouse and
securities repurchase facilities.
Servicer Advance Financing. In connection with our servicer advance investments, we consolidate an entity that was formed to
finance servicing advances and for which we, through our control of an affiliated entity majority owned by Redwood (the "SA Buyer")
formed to invest in servicer advance investments and excess MSRs, are the primary beneficiary. The servicer advance financing
consists of non-recourse short-term securitization debt, secured by servicer advances. We consolidate the securitization entity that
issued the debt, but the securitization entity is independent of Redwood and the assets and liabilities are not owned by and are not legal
obligations of Redwood.
SA Buyer has agreed to purchase all future arising servicer advances under certain residential mortgage servicing agreements. SA
Buyer relies, in part, on its members to make committed capital contributions in order to pay the purchase price for future servicer
advances. A failure by any or all of the members to make such capital contributions for amounts required to fund servicer advances
could result in an event of default under our servicer advance financing and a complete loss of our investment in SA Buyer and its
servicer advance investments and excess MSRs. Additionally, to the extent that the servicer of the underlying mortgage loans (who is
unaffiliated with us except through its co-investment in SA Buyer and the securitization entity) fails to recover the servicer advances
in which we have invested, or takes longer than we expect to recover such advances, the value of our investment could be adversely
affected and we could fail to achieve our expected return and suffer losses.
94
The outstanding balance of servicer advances securing the financing is not likely to be repaid on or before the maturity date of
such financing arrangement. We expect to request the same counterparty or another one of our financing sources to renew or refinance
the financing for an additional fixed period; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to extend the financing
arrangement upon the expiration of its stated term, which subjects us to a number of risks. A financing source that elects to extend or
refinance may charge higher interest rates and impose more onerous terms upon us, including without limitation, lowering the amount
of financing that can be extended against the servicer advances being financed. If we are unable to renew or refinance the servicer
advance financing, the securitization entity will be required to repay the outstanding balance of the financing on the related maturity
date. Additionally, there may be substantial increases in the interest rates under the financing arrangement if the debt is not repaid,
extended or refinanced prior to the expected repayment date, which may be before the related maturity date. If the securitization entity
is unable to pay the outstanding balance of the notes, the financing counterparty may foreclose on the servicer advances pledged as
collateral.
Under this servicer advance financing, SA Buyer and the securitization entity, along with the servicer, make various
representations and warranties and have agreed to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms that if breached or triggered
can result in acceleration of all outstanding amounts borrowed under this facility and this facility being unavailable to use for future
financing needs. We do not have the direct ability to control the servicer’s compliance with such covenants and tests and the failure of
SA Buyer, the securitization entity, or the servicer to satisfy any such covenants or tests could result in a partial or total loss on our
investment. The financial covenants of SA Buyer included in this servicer advance financing are further described below under the
heading “Financial Covenants Associated with Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing.”
Subordinate Securities Financing Facilities. Another source of long-term debt financing is through subordinate securities
financing facilities providing non-mark-to-market recourse debt financing on a portfolio of subordinate securities. Financing for the
securities was obtained under these facilities by our transfer of securities to the counterparty in exchange for cash proceeds (in an
amount less than 100% of the fair value of the transferred securities), and our covenant to reacquire those securities from the
counterparty for the same amount plus a financing charge. These financing facilities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
Redwood.
One financing facility may be terminated, at our option, in September 2022, and has a final maturity in September 2024,
provided that the interest rate on amounts outstanding under the facility increases between October 2022 and September 2024. At
December 31, 2021, we had borrowings under this facility totaling $144 million and $0.3 million of unamortized deferred issuance
costs, for a net carrying value of $144 million. At December 31, 2021, the fair value of real estate securities pledged as collateral
under this long-term debt facility was $247 million and included Sequoia securities and securities retained from our Sequoia
securitizations.
Another financing facility may be terminated, at our option, in February 2023, and has a final maturity in February 2025,
provided that the interest rate on amounts outstanding under the facility increases between March 2023 and February 2025. At
December 31, 2021, we had borrowings under this facility totaling $102 million and $0.3 million of unamortized deferred issuance
costs, for a net carrying value of $102 million. At December 31, 2021, the fair value of real estate securities pledged as collateral
under this long-term debt facility was $118 million and included securities retained from our consolidated CAFL securitizations.
Another financing facility may be terminated, at our option, in June 2023, and has a final maturity in June 2026, provided that
the interest rate on amounts outstanding under the facility increases between June 2024 and June 2026. At December 31, 2021, we had
borrowings under this facility totaling $92 million and $0.4 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs, for a net carrying value of
$91 million. At December 31, 2021, the fair value of real estate securities pledged as collateral under this long-term debt facility was
$143 million and included securities retained from our consolidated CAFL securitizations.
In addition to the subordinate securities financing facilities described above, in the ordinary course of business we may seek to
establish additional long-term securities repurchase facilities that may be of a similar or greater size and may have similar or more
restrictive terms.
95
Similar to the uncommitted warehouse and securities repurchase facilities described herein, under these facilities we make
various representations and warranties and have agreed to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms that if breached or
triggered can result in our being required to immediately repay all outstanding amounts borrowed under this facility and this facility
being unavailable to use for future financing needs. In particular, outstanding amounts borrowed under this facility could become
immediately due and payable if there is a failure to pay any amounts due under the facility, the failure to repurchase the securities by
the final maturity date, or upon the insolvency of Redwood, as guarantor. If we breach or trigger the representations and warranties,
covenants, events of default, or other terms of this subordinate securities financing facility, we are exposed to liquidity and other risks,
including of the type described in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in Part
II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Market Risks.”
Financial Covenants Associated With Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing
Set forth below is a summary of the financial covenants associated with our short-term debt and other debt financing facilities.
•
•
•
•
Residential and Business Purpose Loan Warehouse Facilities. As noted above, one source of our debt financing is secured
borrowings under residential and business purpose loan warehouse facilities we have established and, as of December 31,
2021, were in place with several different financial institution counterparties. Financial covenants included in these
warehouse facilities are as follows and at December 31, 2021, and through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we
were in compliance with each of these financial covenants:
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of stockholders’ equity/tangible net worth at Redwood.
•
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of cash and cash equivalents at Redwood.
• Maintenance of a maximum ratio of consolidated recourse indebtedness to stockholders’ equity or tangible net worth at
Redwood.
• With respect to residential loan warehouse facilities, maintenance of uncommitted residential loan warehouse facilities
with a specified level of available borrowing capacity.
Securities Repurchase Facilities. As noted above, another source of our short-term debt financing is through secured
borrowings under securities repurchase facilities we have established with various financial institution counterparties.
Financial covenants included in these securities repurchase facilities are as follows and at December 31, 2021, and through
the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we were in compliance with each of these financial covenants:
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of stockholders’ equity/tangible net worth at Redwood.
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of cash and cash equivalents at Redwood.
• Maintenance of a maximum ratio of consolidated recourse indebtedness to consolidated adjusted tangible net worth at
Redwood.
Committed Line of Credit. As noted above, we also maintain a $10 million committed line of short-term credit from a bank,
which is secured by our pledge of certain mortgage-backed securities we own. The types of financial covenants included in
this bank line of credit are a subset of the covenants summarized above.
Servicer Advance Financing. As noted above, servicer advance financing consists of non-recourse short-term securitization
debt, secured by servicing advances. Financial covenants associated with this financing facility are as follows and at
December 31, 2021, and through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we were in compliance with each of these
financial covenants:
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of stockholders’ equity/tangible net worth at SA Buyer.
• Maintenance of a minimum dollar amount of cash and cash equivalents at SA Buyer.
As noted above, at December 31, 2021, and through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we were in compliance with
the financial covenants associated with our short-term debt and other debt financing facilities. In particular, with respect to:
(i) financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum dollar amount of stockholders’ equity or tangible net worth at Redwood,
at December 31, 2021 our level of stockholders’ equity and tangible net worth resulted in our being in compliance with these
covenants by more than $200 million; and (ii) financial covenants that require us to maintain recourse indebtedness below a specified
ratio at Redwood, at December 31, 2021 our level of recourse indebtedness resulted in our being in compliance with these covenants
at a level such that we could incur at least $600 million in additional recourse indebtedness.
96
Margin Call Provisions Associated With Short-Term Debt and Other Debt Financing
•
Residential and Business Purpose Loan Warehouse Facilities. As noted above, one source of our debt financing is secured
borrowings under residential and business purpose loan warehouse facilities we have established and, as of December 31,
2021, were in place with several different financial institution counterparties. These warehouse facilities include the margin
call provisions described below and during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, and through the date of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, we complied with any margin calls received from creditors under these warehouse facilities:
•
•
Under our marginable residential warehouse facilities, if at any time the market value (as determined by the creditor) of
any residential mortgage loan financed under a facility declines, then the creditor may demand that we transfer additional
collateral to the creditor (in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury obligations (in certain cases), or additional residential
mortgage loans) with a value equal to the amount of the decline. If we receive any such demand, (i) under one of our
residential loan warehouse facilities, we would generally be required to transfer the additional collateral on the same day
(although demands received after a certain time would only require the transfer of additional collateral on the following
business day) and (ii) under one of our residential loan warehouse facilities, we would generally be required to transfer
the additional collateral on the following business day. The value of additional residential and business purpose mortgage
loans transferred as additional collateral is determined by the creditor.
Under certain non-marginable residential and business purpose warehouse facilities, if the value of the asset securing the
mortgage loan financed under a facility declines (as determined by an appraisal or broker price opinion), then the creditor
may demand that we transfer additional collateral to the creditor (in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury obligations (in
certain cases), or additional mortgage loans) with a value equal to the amount of the decline. The conditions precedent to
which the creditor may request updated valuation reports varies by agreement, including, for example, based on the
number of days the loan has been financed under such facility. If we receive any such demand as a result of a margin
deficit based on an updated valuation report, we would generally be required to transfer the additional collateral within
one to five business days depending on the terms of the agreement. The value of additional residential and business
purpose mortgage loans transferred as additional collateral is determined by the creditor.
•
•
Securities Repurchase Facilities. Another source of our short-term debt financing is through secured borrowings under
securities repurchase facilities we have established with various financial institution counterparties. These repurchase
facilities include the margin call provisions described below and during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, and
through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we complied with any margin calls received from creditors under these
repurchase facilities:
•
If at any time the market value (as determined by the creditor) of any securities financed under a facility declines, then
the creditor may demand that we transfer additional collateral to the creditor (in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury
obligations, or additional securities) with a value equal to the amount of the decline. If we receive any such demand, we
would generally be required to transfer the additional collateral on the same day. The value of additional securities
transferred as additional collateral is determined by the creditor.
Committed Line of Credit. As noted above, we also maintain a $10 million committed line of short-term credit from a bank,
which is secured by our pledge of certain mortgage-backed securities we own. Margin call provisions included in this bank
line of credit are as follows and during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, and through the date of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, we complied with any margin calls received from this creditor under this line of credit:
•
If at any time the total market value (as determined by two broker-dealers) of the securities that are pledged as collateral
under this facility declines to a value less than the outstanding amount of borrowings under this facility, then the creditor
may demand that we transfer additional collateral to the creditor (in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury obligations, or
additional securities) with a value equal to the amount of the difference. If we receive any such demand, we would
generally be required to transfer the additional collateral within two business days. The value of additional collateral
pledged is determined by the creditor.
97
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A discussion of critical accounting policies and
the possible effects of changes in estimates on our consolidated financial statements is included in Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and
Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management
discusses the ongoing development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors.
Following is a description of our critical accounting estimates that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have
had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Assets and Liabilities Accounted for at Fair Value
We have elected the fair value option of accounting for a significant portion of the assets and some of the liabilities on our balance
sheet, and the majority of these assets and liabilities utilize Level 3 valuation inputs, which require a significant level of estimation
uncertainty. See Note 5 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information on our assets and liabilities
accounted for at fair value at December 31, 2021, including the significant inputs used to estimate their fair values and the impact the
changes in their fair values had to our financial condition and results of operations. See Note 5 in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, incorporated herein by reference, for the same information on these assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2020. Periodic fluctuations in the values of these assets and liabilities are inherently volatile and thus can
lead to significant period-to-period GAAP earnings volatility. Below, we provide additional information regarding the critical
accounting estimates for these assets and liabilities.
Changes in the Fair Value of Loans Held at Fair Value
We have elected the fair value option for our residential loans, business purpose loans, and multifamily loans. As such, these
loans are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair value and changes in the fair values of these loans are
recorded in Mortgage banking activities, net or Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss) in
the period in which the valuation change occurs. Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of these assets include certain
unobservable inputs (e.g., those requiring our own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment to develop, and changes in
these estimates have had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial condition.
Changes in Fair Values of Securities
Our securities are classified as either trading or AFS securities, and in both cases are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at
their estimated fair values. In addition, we invest in securities of certain securitization entities that we are required to consolidate for
GAAP reporting purposes. We have elected to account for many of these entities as collateralized financing entities and use the fair
value of the ABS issued by these entities (which we determined to be more observable) to determine the fair value of the loans held at
these entities. For trading securities and collateralized financing entities, changes in fair values are recorded in Investment fair value
changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss) in the period in which the valuation change occurs. For available-for-sale
securities, changes in fair value are generally recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance
sheets (as discussed further below). Periodic fluctuations in the values of our securities can be caused by changes in the discount rate
assumptions used to value the securities, as well as actual and anticipated prepayments, delinquencies, losses and other factors on the
loans underlying the securitizations in which we own securities. Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of these assets
include certain unobservable inputs (e.g., those requiring our own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment to develop,
and changes in these estimates have had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial
condition.
For AFS securities, cumulative unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive
income in our consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains are not credited to current earnings and unrealized losses are not charged
against current earnings to the extent they are temporary in nature. Certain factors may require us, however, to recognize a decline in
the value of AFS securities as an allowance for credit losses recorded through our current earnings. Factors that determine other-than-
temporary-impairment include a change in our ability or intent to hold AFS securities, adverse changes to projected cash flows of
assets, or the likelihood that declines in the fair values of assets would not return to their previous levels within a reasonable time.
Estimates used to determine other-than-temporary-impairments on AFS securities require significant judgment and changes in these
estimates have had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial condition.
98
Changes in Fair Values of Servicer Advance Investments
Servicer advance investments are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair values, with changes in fair
values recorded in our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net. Periodic fluctuations in the
values of our servicer advance investments can be caused by changes in the actual and anticipated balance of servicing advances
outstanding, actual and anticipated prepayments on the underlying loans, and changes in the discount rate assumptions used to value
servicer advance investments. Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of these assets include certain unobservable inputs
(e.g., those requiring our own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment to develop, and changes in these estimates have
had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial condition.
Changes in Fair Values of MSRs and Excess MSRs
MSRs and excess MSRs are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair values, with changes in fair values
recorded in our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Other income, net or Investment fair value changes, net. Periodic
fluctuations in the values of our MSRs and excess MSRs can be caused by actual prepayments on the underlying loans, changes in
assumptions regarding future projected prepayments on the underlying loans, actual or anticipated changes in delinquencies, and
changes in the discount rate assumptions used to value MSRs and excess MSRs. Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of
these assets include certain unobservable inputs (e.g., those requiring our own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment
to develop, and changes in these estimates have had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and
financial condition.
Changes in Fair Values of HEIs
HEIs are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair values, with changes in fair values recorded in our
consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net. Periodic fluctuations in the values of our HEIs can be
caused by changes in the discount rate assumptions used to value HEIs, changes in assumptions regarding future projected home
values, changes in assumptions regarding future projected prepayment rates, as well as changes in the rate and magnitude of defaults
on the portfolio. Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of these assets include certain unobservable inputs (e.g., those
requiring our own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment to develop, and changes in these estimates have had and are
reasonably like to have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial condition.
Changes in Fair Values of Strategic Investments
Several of our strategic investments are carried on our consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair values (or at historical
cost under the measurement alternative for equity investments), with changes in fair values recorded in our consolidated statements of
income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net. All of our strategic investments are in private companies that do not have readily
determinable fair values and estimates of their fair value require significant judgment to develop. Changes in the estimates used to
determine their fair value could have a material effect on our reported earnings and financial condition.
Changes in Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments
We generally use derivatives as part of our mortgage banking activities (e.g., to manage risks associated with loans we plan to
acquire and subsequently sell or securitize), in relation to our residential investments (to manage risks associated with our securities,
MSRs, and held-for-investment loans), and to manage variability in debt interest expense indexed to adjustable rates, and cash flows
on assets and liabilities that have different coupon rates (fixed rates versus floating rates, or floating rates based on different indices).
Significant inputs used to estimate the fair value of certain of our derivatives include unobservable inputs (e.g., those requiring our
own data or assumptions) that require significant judgment to develop, and changes in these estimates have had and are reasonably
like to have a material effect on reported earnings and our financial condition.
Additionally, the nature of the instruments we use and the accounting treatment for the specific assets, liabilities, and derivatives
may therefore lead to volatility in our periodic earnings, even when we are meeting our hedging objectives. Most of our derivatives are
accounted for as trading instruments with associated changes in value recorded through our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Changes in value of the assets and liabilities we manage by using derivatives may not be accounted for similarly. This could lead to
reported income and book values in specific periods that do not necessarily reflect the economics of our risk management strategy.
Even when the assets and liabilities are similarly accounted for as trading instruments, periodic changes in their values may not
coincide as other market factors (e.g., supply and demand) may affect certain instruments and not others at any given time.
99
Changes in Fair Values of Intangible Assets
In connection with our acquisitions of CoreVest and 5 Arches, a portion of the purchase price of each acquisition was allocated to
goodwill and intangible assets. During 2020, we impaired our entire balance of goodwill associated with these acquisitions.
Accounting standards require that we routinely assess intangible assets for indicators of impairment, and if indicators are present, we
must review them for impairment. The assessments to determine if intangible assets are impaired requires significant judgement to
develop assumptions and estimates. If we determine intangible assets are impaired, we will be required to write down the value of
these assets, up to their entire balance. Any write-down would have a negative effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Changes in Mortgage Banking Income
The amount of income that can be earned from mortgage banking activities is primarily dependent on the volume of loans we are
able to acquire and any potential profit we earn upon the sale or securitization of these loans. Our ability to acquire loans and the
volume of loans we acquire is dependent on many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and
changes in interest rates, loan origination volumes industry-wide and at the sellers we purchase our loans from, increased regulation,
and competition from other financial institutions. Our profitability from mortgage banking activities is also dependent on many
factors, including our ability to effectively hedge certain risks related to changes in interest rates and other factors that are beyond our
control, including changes in market credit risk pricing. Additionally, our income from mortgage banking activities is generally
generated over the period from when we identify a loan for purchase until we subsequently sell or securitize the loan. This income
may encompass positive or negative market valuation adjustments on loans, hedging gains or losses associated with related risk
management activities, and any other related transaction expenses, and may be realized unevenly over the course of one or more
quarters for financial reporting purposes. Additional factors that could impact our profitability are discussed in Part I, Item 1A - Risk
Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and above, under the headings “Changes in the Fair Value of Loans Held at Fair Value”
and “Changes in Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments.” Changes in the volumes of loans acquired or originated in
connection with our mortgage banking activities and our profitability on these activities can lead to significant period-to-period GAAP
earnings volatility.
Changes in Yields for Securities
The yields we project on available-for-sale real estate securities can have a significant effect on the periodic interest income we
recognize for financial reporting purposes. Yields can vary as a function of credit results, prepayment rates, interest rates and call
assumptions. If estimated future credit losses are less than our prior estimate, credit losses occur later than expected, prepayment rates
are faster than expected (meaning the present value of projected cash flows is greater than previously expected for assets acquired at a
discount to principal balance), or securities are called (or called sooner than expected) the yield over the remaining life of the security
may be adjusted upwards. If estimated future credit losses exceed our prior expectations, credit losses occur more quickly than
expected, prepayments occur more slowly than expected (meaning the present value of projected cash flows is less than previously
expected for assets acquired at a discount to principal balance) or securities are not called (or called later than expected), the yield over
the remaining life of the security may be adjusted downward.
Changes in the actual maturities of real estate securities may also affect their yields to maturity. Actual maturities are affected by
the contractual lives of the associated mortgage collateral, periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of principal. Therefore,
actual maturities of AFS securities are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities. Stated contractual maturities are generally
greater than 10 years. The assumptions we use to estimate future cash flows and the resulting effective yields and interest income,
require significant judgement to develop, and changes in these estimates have had and are reasonably like to have a material effect on
our reported earnings and financial condition.
Changes in Loss Contingency Reserves
We may be exposed to various loss contingencies, including, without limitation, those described in Note 16 to the consolidated
financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In accordance with FASB guidance on
accounting for contingencies, we review the need for any loss contingency reserves and establish them when, in the opinion of
management, it is probable that a matter would result in a liability, and the amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated. The
establishment of a loss contingency reserve, the subsequent increase in a reserve or release of reserves previously established, or the
recognition of a loss in excess of previously established reserves, can occur as a result of various factors and events that affect
management’s opinion of whether the standard for establishing, increasing, or continuing to maintain, a reserve has been met. Changes
in the loss contingency reserves can lead to significant period-to-period GAAP earnings volatility.
100
Changes in Provision for Taxes
Our provision for income taxes is primarily the result of GAAP income or losses generated at our TRS. Deferred tax assets/
liabilities are generated by temporary differences in GAAP income and taxable income at our taxable subsidiaries and are a significant
component of our GAAP provision for income taxes. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. We consider historical and projected future taxable income and capital gains as well as tax planning strategies in making
this assessment. We determine the extent to which realization of this deferred asset is not assured and establish a valuation allowance
accordingly. The estimate of net deferred tax assets and associated valuation allowances could change in future periods to the extent
that actual or revised estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward periods change from current expectations, causing
significant period-to-period GAAP earnings volatility.
MARKET AND OTHER RISKS
Market Risks
We seek to manage risks inherent in our business — including but not limited to credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk,
liquidity risk, and fair value risk — in a prudent manner designed to enhance our earnings and dividends and preserve our capital. In
general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage such risks, and to maintain
capital levels consistent with these risks. Information concerning the risks we are managing, how these risks are changing over time,
and potential GAAP earnings and taxable income volatility we may experience as a result of these risks is discussed under the caption
“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the caption "Risks Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term
Borrowing Facilities" within this MD&A, and under the caption "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Risks
In addition to the market and other risks described above, our business and results of operations are subject to a variety of types of
risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, those described under the caption “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
101
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risks
We seek to manage risks inherent in our business - including but not limited to credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk,
inflation risk, and fair value and liquidity risk - in a prudent manner designed to enhance our earnings and dividends and preserve our
capital. In general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage such risks, and to
maintain capital levels consistent with these risks. This section presents a general overview of these risks. Additional information
concerning the risks we are managing, how these risks are changing over time, and potential GAAP earnings and taxable income
volatility we may experience as a result of these risks is further discussed in Part I, Item 1A and Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Credit Risk
Integral to our business is assuming credit risk through our ownership of real estate loans, securities and other investments as well
as through our reliance on the creditworthiness of business counterparties. We believe the securities and loans we purchase are priced
to generate an expected return that compensates us for the underlying credit risk associated with these investments. Nevertheless, there
may be significant credit losses associated with these investments should they perform worse than we expect on a credit basis. For
additional details, refer to Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and see the risk factor titled “The nature of the assets
we hold and the investments we make expose us to credit risk that could negatively impact the value of those assets and investments,
our earnings, dividends, cash flows, and access to liquidity, or otherwise negatively affect our business.”
We manage our credit risks by analyzing the extent of the risk we are taking and reviewing whether we believe the appropriate
underwriting criteria are met, and we utilize systems and staff to monitor the ongoing credit performance of our loans and securities.
To the extent we find the credit risks on specific assets are changing adversely, we may be able to take actions, such as selling the
affected investments, to mitigate potential losses. However, we may not always be successful in analyzing risks, reviewing
underwriting criteria, foreseeing adverse changes in credit performance or in effectively mitigating future credit losses and the ability
to sell an asset may be limited due to the structure of the asset or the absence of a liquid market for the asset.
Residential and Business Purpose Loans and Securities
Our residential and business purpose loans and securities backed by residential loans are generally secured by real property.
Credit losses on residential real estate loans and securities can occur for many reasons, including: poor origination practices; fraud;
poor underwriting; poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions; increases in payments required to be made by borrowers;
declines in the value of real estate; natural disasters, the effects of climate change (including flooding, drought, and severe weather)
and other natural events; uninsured property loss; over-leveraging of the borrower; costs of remediation of environmental conditions,
such as indoor mold; acts of war or terrorism; changes in legal protections for lenders and other changes in law or regulation; and
personal events affecting borrowers, such as reduction in income, job loss, divorce, or health problems. In addition, if the U.S.
economy or the housing market were to weaken (and that weakening was in excess of what we anticipated), credit losses could
increase beyond levels that we have anticipated.
Credit losses on business purpose real estate loans and securities can occur for many of the reasons noted above for residential
real estate loans and securities. Moreover, these types of real estate loans and securities may not be fully amortizing and, therefore, the
borrower’s ability to repay the principal when due may depend upon the ability of the borrower to refinance or sell the property at
maturity. Business purpose real estate loans and securities are particularly sensitive to conditions in the rental housing market,
including declining or delinquent rents, and to demand for rental residential properties.
With respect to most of the legacy Sequoia securitization entities sponsored by us that we consolidate and for a portion of the
loans underlying residential loan securities we have acquired from securitizations sponsored by others, the interest rate is adjustable.
Accordingly, when short-term interest rates rise, required monthly payments from homeowners may rise under the terms of these
loans, and this may increase borrowers’ delinquencies and defaults that can lead to additional credit losses.
We may also own some securities backed by loans that are not prime quality such as re-performing and non-performing loans,
Alt-A quality loans, and subprime loans, that have substantially higher credit risk characteristics than prime-quality loans.
Consequently, we can expect these lower credit-quality loans to have higher rates of delinquency and loss, and if such losses differ
from our assumptions, we could incur credit losses. In addition, we may invest in riskier loan types with the potential for higher
delinquencies and losses as compared to regular amortization loans, but believe these securities offer us the opportunity to generate
attractive risk-adjusted returns as a result of attractive pricing and the manner in which these securitizations are structured.
Nevertheless, there remains substantial uncertainty about the future performance of these assets.
102
Additionally, we own residential mortgage credit risk transfer (or "CRT") securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ("the
Agencies"), for which we assume credit risk both on the residential loans that the securities reference, as well as corporate credit risk
from the Agencies, as our investments in the securities are not secured by the reference loans.
Multifamily Loans and Securities
Multifamily loans we may acquire, invest in, or originate are generally secured by real property. The multifamily securities we
invest in are primarily subordinate positions in securitizations sponsored by Freddie Mac that are comprised of loans collateralized by
multifamily properties. We also own and may continue to invest in other third-party sponsored multifamily mortgage-backed
securities. Credit losses on these real estate loans and securities can occur for many of the reasons noted above for residential and
business-purpose real estate loans, including: poor origination practices; fraud; faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor
underwriting; legal errors; poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions; decline in the value of properties; declining rents on
single and multifamily residential rental properties; special hazards; earthquakes and other natural events; over-leveraging of the
borrower or on the property; reduction in market rents and occupancies and poor property management practices; and changes in legal
protections for lenders. In addition, if the U.S. economy were to weaken (and that weakening was in excess of what we anticipated),
credit losses could increase beyond levels that we have anticipated. Moreover, the principal balance of multifamily loans may be
significantly larger than the residential and business-purpose real estate loans we own.
Home Equity Investments
Home equity investment contracts we invest in are secured by real property. Credit losses on these investments can occur for
many reasons, including: poor origination practices; fraud; faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor underwriting; legal errors;
poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions; decline in the value of properties; special hazards; earthquakes and other natural
events; over-leveraging of the borrower or on the property; and changes in legal protections for lenders. In addition, if the U.S.
economy or the housing market were to weaken (and that weakening was in excess of what we anticipated), credit losses could
increase beyond levels that we have anticipated.
Counterparties
We are also exposed to credit risk with respect to our business and lender counterparties. For example, counterparties we acquire
loans from, lend to, or invest in, make representations and warranties and covenants to us, and may also indemnify us against certain
losses. To the extent we have suffered a loss and are entitled to enforce those agreements to recover damages, if our counterparties are
insolvent or unable or unwilling to comply with these agreements we would suffer a loss due to the credit risk associated with our
counterparties. As an example, under short-term borrowing facilities and certain swap and other derivative agreements, we sometimes
transfer assets as collateral to our counterparties. To the extent a counterparty is not able to return this collateral to us if and when we
are entitled to its return, we could suffer a loss due to the credit risk associated with that counterparty.
In addition, because we rely on the availability of credit under committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities to fund our
business and investments, our counterparties’ willingness and ability to extend credit to us under these facilities is a significant
counterparty risk (and is discussed further below under the heading “Fair Value and Liquidity Risks”).
In connection with our servicer advance investments, the partnership entity (the "SA Buyer") formed to invest in servicer advance
investments and excess MSRs, has agreed to purchase all future arising servicer advances under certain residential mortgage servicing
agreements. SA Buyer relies, in part, on its members to make committed capital contributions in order to pay the purchase price for
future servicer advances. A failure by any or all of the members to make such capital contributions for amounts required to fund
servicer advances could result in an event of default under our servicer advance financing and a complete loss of our investment in SA
Buyer and its servicer advance investments and excess MSRs.
The outstanding balance of servicer advances securing the financing is not likely to be repaid on or before the maturity date of
such financing arrangement. We expect to request the same counterparty or another one of our financing sources to renew or refinance
the financing for an additional fixed period, however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to extend the financing
arrangement upon the expiration of its stated term, which subjects us to a number of risks. A financing source that elects to extend or
refinance may charge higher interest rates and impose more onerous terms upon us, including without limitation, lowering the amount
of financing that can be extended against the servicer advances being financed. If we are unable to renew or refinance the servicer
advance financing, the securitization entity will be required to repay the outstanding balance of the financing on the related maturity
date. Additionally, there may be substantial increases in the interest rates under the financing arrangement if the notes are not repaid,
extended or refinanced prior to the expected repayment date, which may be before the related maturity date. If the securitization entity
is unable to pay the outstanding balance of the notes, the financing counterparty may foreclose on the servicer advances pledged as
collateral.
103
Under our servicer advance financing, the consolidated partnership (SA Buyer) and the securitization entity, along with the
servicer (who is unaffiliated with us except through their co-investment in SA Buyer and the securitization entity), make various
representations and warranties and have agreed to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms that if breached or triggered
can result in acceleration of all outstanding amounts borrowed under this facility and this facility being unavailable to use for future
financing needs. We do not have the direct ability to control the servicer’s compliance with such covenants and tests and the failure of
SA Buyer, the securitization entity, or the servicer to satisfy any such covenants or tests could result in a partial or total loss on our
investment.
Interest Rate Risk
Changes in interest rates and the shape of the yield curve can affect the cash flows and fair values of our assets, liabilities, and
derivative financial instruments and, consequently, affect our earnings and reported equity. Our general strategy with respect to
interest rates is to maintain an asset/liability posture (including hedges) that assumes some interest rate risks but not to such a degree
that the achievement of our long-term goals would likely be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we are
willing to accept short-term volatility of earnings and changes in our reported equity in order to accomplish our goal of achieving
attractive long-term returns. For additional details, refer to Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and see the risk factor
titled “Interest rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us and could lead to reduced earnings and increased volatility in
our earnings.”
We invest in securities, residential loans, business purpose loans, multifamily loans, and other mortgage-related assets, which all
expose us to interest rate risk. Additionally, we acquire and originate residential and business purpose loans, then sell or securitize
these assets. We are exposed to interest rate risk during the “accumulation” period - the period from when we enter into agreements to
purchase the loans with the intention of selling or securitizing them at a future date.
To mitigate this interest rate risk, we use derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes. We may also use
derivative financial instruments in an effort to maintain a close match between pledged assets and debt. However, we generally do not
attempt to completely hedge changes in interest rates, and at times, we may be subject to more interest rate risk than we generally
desire in the long term. Changes in interest rates will have an impact on the values and cash flows of our assets and corresponding
liabilities.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayment risks exist in many of the assets on our consolidated balance sheets. In general, discount securities benefit from faster
prepayment rates on the underlying real estate loans while premium securities (such as certain IOs we own), and mortgage servicing
assets benefit from slower prepayments on the underlying loans. In addition, loans held for investment at premiums also benefit from
slower prepayments whereas loans held at discounts benefit from faster prepayments. For additional details, refer to Part I, Item 1A of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and see the risk factor titled “Changes in prepayment rates of mortgage loans could reduce our
earnings, dividends, cash flows, and access to liquidity.”
When we make investments that are subject to prepayment risk, we apply a reasonable baseline prepayment range in determining
expected returns. If actual prepayment rates deviate from our baseline expectations, it could have an adverse change to our expected
returns. In order to mitigate this risk, we may use derivative financial instruments. We caution that prepayment rates are difficult to
predict or anticipate, and adverse changes in the rate of prepayment could reduce our cash flows, earnings, and dividends.
Inflation Risk
Virtually all of our consolidated assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates and other factors
drive our performance more directly than does inflation. That said, changes in interest rates generally correlate with inflation rates or
changes in inflation rates, and therefore adverse changes in inflation or changes in inflation expectations can lead to lower returns on
our investments than originally anticipated.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our activities and balance sheets are measured
with reference to historical cost or fair value without considering inflation.
104
Fair Value and Liquidity Risks
To fund our assets we may use a variety of debt alternatives in addition to equity capital that present us with fair value and
liquidity risks. We seek to manage these risks, including by maintaining what we believe to be adequate cash and capital levels.
We acquire and originate residential and business purpose loans and then sell or securitize them as part of our mortgage banking
operations. Changes in the fair value of the loans, once sold or securitized, do not have an impact on our liquidity. However, changes
in fair values during the accumulation period (while these loans are typically funded with short-term debt before they are sold or
securitized) may impact our liquidity. We would be exposed to liquidity risk to the extent the values of these loans decline and/or the
counterparties we use to finance these investments adversely change our borrowing requirements. We attempt to mitigate our liquidity
risk from short-term financing facilities by setting aside adequate capital, in addition to amounts required by our financing
counterparties.
Some of the securities we acquire are funded with a combination of our capital and short-term debt facilities. For the securities we
acquire with a combination of capital and short-term debt, we would be exposed to liquidity risk to the extent the values of these
investments decline and/or the counterparties we use to finance these investments adversely change our borrowing requirements. We
attempt to mitigate our liquidity risk from short-term financing facilities by setting aside adequate capital.
Under our borrowing facilities, interest rate swaps and other derivatives agreements, we pledge assets as security for our payment
obligations and make various representations and warranties and agree to certain covenants, events of default, and other terms. In
addition, our borrowing facilities are generally uncommitted, meaning that each time we request a new borrowing under a facility the
lender has the option to decline to extend credit to us. The terms of these facilities and agreements typically include financial
covenants (such as covenants to maintain a minimum amount of tangible net worth or stockholders’ equity and/or a minimum amount
of liquid assets and/or a maximum amount of recourse debt to equity), margin requirements (which typically require us to pledge
additional collateral if and when the value of previously pledged collateral declines), operating covenants (such as covenants to
conduct our business in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and covenants to provide notice of certain events to
creditors), representations and warranties (such as representations and warranties relating to characteristics of pledged collateral, our
exposure to litigation and/or regulatory enforcement actions and the absence of material adverse changes to our financial condition,
our operations, or our business prospects), and events of default (such as a breach of covenant or representation/warranty and cross-
defaults, under which an event of default is triggered under a credit facility if an event of default or similar event occurs under another
credit facility). For additional details, refer to Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and see the discussion titled “Risks
Relating to Debt Incurred under Short- and Long-Term Borrowing Facilities.
Business, Operational, Regulatory, and Other Risks
In addition to the financial risks described above, we are subject to a variety of other risks in the ordinary conduct of our business,
including risks related to our business and industry (such as economic, competitive, and strategic risks), operational risks (including
cybersecurity and technology risks), risks related to legislative and regulatory compliance matters, and risks related to our REIT status
and our status under the Investment Company Act of 1940, among others. The effective management of these risks is of critical
importance to the overall success of our business. These risks are further discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Quantitative Information on Market Risk
Our future earnings are sensitive to a number of market risk factors and changes in these factors may have a variety of secondary
effects that, in turn, will also impact our earnings and equity. To supplement the discussion above of the market risks we face, the
following table incorporates information that may be useful in analyzing certain market risks that may affect our consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2021. The table presents principal cash flows and related average interest rates for material interest rate
sensitive assets and liabilities by year of repayment. The forward curve (future interest rates as implied by the yield structure of debt
markets) at December 31, 2021, was used to project the average coupon rates for each year presented. The timing of principal cash
flows includes assumptions on the prepayment speeds of assets based on their recent prepayment performance and future prepayment
performance consistent with the forward curve. Our future results depend greatly on the credit performance of the underlying loans
(this table assumes no credit losses), future interest rates, prepayments, and our ability to invest our existing cash and future cash flow.
105
Quantitative Information on Market Risk
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Sensitive Assets (1)
Residential Loans - HFS (2)
Adjustable Rate
Principal
Fixed Rate
Hybrid
Interest Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Residential Loans - HFI at Sequoia
Adjustable Rate
Principal
Principal Amounts Maturing and Effective Rates During Period
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Thereafter
December 31, 2021
Fair
Value
Principal
Balance
$
45
1.88 %
1,709,548
3.30 %
104,272
3.04 %
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
$
45 $
34
—
N/A
—
1,709,548
1,738,846
N/A
—
N/A
104,272
106,402
85,008
61,307
47,277
36,129
27,669
6,667
264,057
230,455
Interest Rate
1.97 %
2.65 %
3.00 %
3.04 %
3.07 %
3.07 %
Fixed Rate
Principal
722,456
550,170
427,975
338,931
272,339
1,293,598
3,605,469
3,628,465
Interest Rate
3.42 %
3.42 %
3.42 %
3.42 %
3.43 %
3.43 %
Residential Loans - HFI at Freddie
Mac SLST
Fixed Rate
Principal
132,589
130,038
122,348
115,190
108,264
1,323,812
1,932,241
1,888,230
4.03 %
4.21 %
4.20 %
4.19 %
4.18 %
4.18 %
Interest Rate
Business Purpose Loans - HFS (2)
Fixed Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Business Purpose Loans - HFI at
Redwood
348,232
4.73 %
—
N/A
—
N/A
Fixed Rate
Principal
325,621
152,443
192,328
Interest Rate
6.91 %
6.69 %
5.47 %
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
348,232
358,309
670,392
666,364
Single-Family Rental Loans - HFI
at CAFL
Fixed Rate
Principal
47,778
50,309
52,973
55,779
58,734
3,075,376
3,340,949
3,488,074
Interest Rate
5.17 %
5.17 %
5.17 %
5.17 %
5.17 %
5.17 %
Single-Family Rental Bridge Loans
- HFI at CAFL
Fixed Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Multifamily Loans - HFI at Freddie
Mac K-Series
Fixed Rate
Principal
190,593
84,024
—
—
—
—
274,617
278,242
7.05 %
6.53 %
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
455,169
473,514
7,975
8,326
8,638
430,230
Interest Rate
4.21 %
4.21 %
4.22 %
3.55 %
106
Quantitative Information on Market Risk
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Sensitive Assets
(continued)
Residential Senior Securities
Fixed Rate (3)
Principal
Principal Amounts Maturing and Effective Rates During Period
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Thereafter
December 31, 2021
Fair
Value
Principal
Balance
$
—
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$
—
$
— $
21,787
Interest Rate
0.16 %
0.16 %
0.15 %
0.15 %
0.14 %
0.11 %
Residential Subordinate
Securities
Fixed Rate
Hybrid
Principal
Interest Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Multifamily Securities
Adjustable Rate
Principal
7,626
2,077
517
1,364
9,208
397,390
418,182
310,064
4.01 %
4.11 %
4.20 %
4.24 %
4.30 %
4.32 %
1,240
956
766
633
537
12,775
16,907
12,845
2.05 %
2.42 %
2.65 %
2.66 %
2.65 %
2.18 %
14,792
4,534
—
—
—
3,600
22,926
23,496
Interest Rate
3.51 %
5.63 %
8.94 %
8.91 %
8.99 %
8.99 %
Fixed Rate
Principal
—
—
—
—
—
8,930
8,930
9,219
Interest Rate
4.93 %
5.63 %
6.00 %
6.01 %
6.06 %
6.16 %
Interest Rate Sensitive Liabilities
Asset-Backed Securities Issued
Sequoia Entities
Adjustable Rate
Principal
67,355
49,010
38,340
28,896
22,606
53,298
259,505
227,881
Interest Rate
1.36 %
1.93 %
2.21 %
2.52 %
2.23 %
2.23 %
Fixed Rate
Principal
597,045
436,443
337,597
282,003
229,764
1,470,221
3,353,073
3,383,048
Interest Rate
2.77 %
2.71 %
2.52 %
2.38 %
2.32 %
2.32 %
Freddie Mac SLST Entities
Fixed Rate
Principal
148,437
123,363
119,268
119,994
112,719
911,857
1,535,638
1,588,463
Interest Rate
3.29 %
3.40 %
3.58 %
3.60 %
3.63 %
3.63 %
Freddie Mac K-Series Entities
Fixed Rate
Principal
7,975
8,326
8,638
393,761
Interest Rate
2.67 %
2.67 %
2.68 %
2.27 %
—
N/A
—
N/A
418,700
441,857
CAFL Entities
Fixed Rate
Principal
131,507
194,358
393,922
421,112
566,814
1,557,053
3,264,766
3,474,898
Interest Rate
2.74 %
2.67 %
2.63 %
2.77 %
2.50 %
2.50 %
Point HEI Entities
Fixed Rate
Principal
29,786
27,732
25,780
20,747
16,948
17,799
138,792
137,410
Interest Rate
3.71 %
3.71 %
4.37 %
5.71 %
5.71 %
5.71 %
Short-Term Debt
Principal
Interest Rate
2,178,635
1.94 %
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
N/A
—
2,178,635
2,177,362
N/A
107
Quantitative Information on Market Risk
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Sensitive Liabilities
(continued)
Long-Term Debt
Convertible Notes Principal
Principal Amounts Maturing and Effective Rates During Period
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Thereafter
December 31, 2021
Fair
Value
Principal
Balance
$ —
$ 198,629
$ 150,200
$ 172,092
$ —
$
—
$ 520,921 $ 537,300
Interest Rate
5.33 %
5.33 %
5.69 %
5.75 %
N/A
N/A
Trust Preferred Securities and
Subordinated Notes
Other Long-
Term Debt
Principal
Interest Rate
Principal
Interest Rate
Interest Rate Agreements
Interest Rate Swaps
(Purchased)
(Sold)
Notional
Amount
Receive Strike
Rate
Pay Strike Rate
Notional
Amount
Receive Strike
Rate
Pay Strike Rate
—
—
—
—
—
139,500
139,500
97,650
2.85 %
3.66 %
3.87 %
3.95 %
3.93 %
4.16 %
—
651,712
144,385
102,351
91,707
3.37 %
3.37 %
4.36 %
4.47 %
4.75 %
—
N/A
990,155
989,570
—
—
3,000
—
98,500
118,100
219,600
309
0.60 %
1.46 %
1.41 %
1.46 %
1.62 %
1.46 %
1.70 %
1.47 %
1.68 %
1.47 %
1.83 %
1.56 %
—
—
—
—
—
225,000
225,000
(949)
1.53 %
0.60 %
1.53 %
1.41 %
1.53 %
1.62 %
1.53 %
1.70 %
1.53 %
1.68 %
1.53 %
1.83 %
(1) For the key assumptions and sensitivity analysis for assets retained from securitizations, refer to Note 4 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
(2) As we generally expect our residential loans held-for-sale to be sold within one year, we have only presented principal amounts and effective rates through 2022.
(3) The fair value of fixed-rate senior securities includes $22 million interest-only securities, for which there is no principal at December 31, 2021.
108
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Redwood Trust, Inc. and Notes thereto, together with the Reports of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are set forth on pages F-1 through F-123 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have adopted and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed on our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and
that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls
and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable
assurance level.
Management of Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company, or Redwood), is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
As of the end of our 2021 fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework released by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on this assessment, management has determined that
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, was effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2021 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of directors of Redwood; and provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, has been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page F-4, which expresses an unqualified opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021.
109
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company's Board of Directors has set May 24, 2022 as the date for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. The meeting
will be held at 8:30 a.m. (Pacific) as a “virtual” Annual Meeting of Stockholders via a live webcast, as an alternative to an in-person
meeting. Stockholders of record as of March 25, 2022 will be entitled to vote at that meeting.
On February 24, 2022, Richard D. Baum, age 75, and Jeffrey T. Pero, age 75, each notified the Board of Directors, in accordance
with the retirement provisions in the Company's Corporate Governance Standards, they are retiring from the Board of Directors,
effective as of May 24, 2022, and will not stand for reelection at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Baum serves as the
Board Chair and serves on the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Mr. Pero
serves on the Compensation Committee and serves as the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Mr.
Baum and Mr. Pero will retire following more than 30 years of service in aggregate as members of the Redwood Trust, Inc. Board of
Directors.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
110
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
111
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents filed as part of this report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
PART IV
(2) Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements: Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
All other Consolidated Financial Statements schedules not included have been omitted because they are either inapplicable or the
information required is provided in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8, of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
3.1.6
3.1.7
3.1.8
3.1.9
3.1.10
3.1.11
3.1.12
3.2.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
Exhibit
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, effective July 6, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles Supplementary of the Registrant, effective August 10, 1994 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.1, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles Supplementary of the Registrant, effective August 11, 1995 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.2, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles Supplementary of the Registrant, effective August 9, 1996 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.3, filed on August 6, 2008)
Certificate of Amendment of the Registrant, effective June 30, 1998 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.4, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles Supplementary of the Registrant, effective April 7, 2003 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.5, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective June 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1.6, filed on August 6, 2008)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective May 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May 21, 2009)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective May 24, 2011 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May 20, 2011)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective May 18, 2012 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May 21, 2012)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May 21, 2013)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective May 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May 17, 2019)
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, effective June 15, 2020 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on June 15, 2020)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as adopted on November 3, 2021 (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.2.1, filed on November 4, 2021)
Description of Redwood Trust, Inc. Common Stock (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K, Exhibit 4.1, filed on February 26, 2021)
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (No. 333-08363), Exhibit 4.3, filed on August 6, 1996)
Indenture dated as of October 1, 2001 between Sequoia Mortgage Trust 5 and Bankers Trust Company of
California, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1, filed on November 15, 2001)
112
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
9.1
9.2
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
Indenture dated as April 1, 2002 between Sequoia Mortgage Trust 6 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
Exhibit 99.1, filed on May 13, 2002)
Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of December 12, 2006 between the Registrant and The Bank of New York
Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.4, filed on December 12, 2006)
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated December 12, 2006 among the Registrant, The Bank of New York
Trust Company, National Association, The Bank of New York (Delaware), the Administrative Trustees (as named
therein) and the several holders of the Preferred Securities from time to time (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.3, filed on December 12, 2006)
Purchase Agreement dated December 12, 2006 among the Registrant, Redwood Capital Trust I and Merrill Lynch
International (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.1, filed on
December 12, 2006)
Purchase Agreement dated December 12, 2006 among the Registrant, Redwood Capital Trust I and Bear, Stearns &
Co. Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.2, filed on
December 12, 2006)
Subordinated Indenture dated as of May 23, 2007 between the Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.2, filed on May 23, 2007)
Purchase Agreement dated May 23, 2007 between the Registrant and Obsidian CDO Warehouse, LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.1, filed on May 23, 2007)
Indenture, dated March 6, 2013, between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, Exhibit 4.1, filed on March
6, 2013)
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated August 18, 2017, between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as Trustee (including the form of 4.75% Convertible Senior Note due 2023) (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 4.2, filed on August 18, 2017)
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated June 25, 2018, between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as Trustee (including the form of 5.625% Convertible Senior Note due 2024) (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 4.2, filed on June 25, 2018)
Indenture, by and among Redwood Trust, Inc., RWT Holdings, Inc., and Wilmington Trust, National Association,
as Trustee, dated as of September 24, 2019 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K, Exhibit 99.1, filed on September 25, 2019)
Waiver Agreement dated as of November 15, 2007 between the Registrant and Davis Selected Advisors, L.P.
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 9.1, filed on March 5, 2008)
Amendment of Waiver Agreement dated as of January 16, 2008 between Registrant and Davis Selected Advisors,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 9.2, filed on March 5,
2008)
Amended and Restated 2014 Incentive Award Plan, as amended through December 16, 2020 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on February 26, 2021)
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2021 Form of Award Agreement for
Director Grants) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1, filed
on May 7, 2021)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.2, filed on February 26,
2021)
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on December 18,
2020)
113
Exhibit
Number
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
Exhibit
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.3, filed on December 18,
2020)
Form of Cash Settled Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form of Award
Agreement) (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.2, filed on
December 18, 2020)
Form of Performance Award Agreement (Cash – Performance Vesting) under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.4, filed on August 7,
2020)
Form of Performance Award Agreement (Cash – Time Vesting) under 2014 Incentive Plan (2020 Form)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.5, filed on August 7,
2020)
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2019 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on December 13,
2019)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2018 Form of Award Agreement) (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant's Annual Report on Annual 10-K, Exhibit 10.23, filed on March 1, 2019)
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2018 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on December 17,
2018)
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Plan (2018 Form of Award Agreement)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.2, filed on December 17,
2018)
Form of Letter Agreement Amendment to Equity Awards Under 2014 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.3, filed on December 17, 2018)
Form of Redwood Trust, Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Award Plan (2014)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.4, filed on August 8,
2014)
Form of Redwood Trust, Inc. Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2014 Incentive Award Plan (2014)
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.2, filed on August 8,
2014)
2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through May 15, 2019 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on May 17, 2019)
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, filed on January 14, 2009)
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of November 23,
2013 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.15, filed on February
26, 2014)
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1, filed on November 8, 2018)
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to the Plan text included in the
Registrant’s Prospectus Supplement filed on May 9, 2019)
Summary of the Registrant’s Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference
to the “Director Compensation” section of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 27, 2020)
Revised Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.3, filed on November 16, 2009)
Sixth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2021, by and between Christopher J.
Abate and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit
10.1, filed on August 4, 2021)
114
Exhibit
Number
10.24*
10.25*
10.26*
10.27*
10.28*
10.29*
10.30*
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
10.40
10.41
Exhibit
Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2021, by and between Dashiell I.
Robinson and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit
10.2, filed on August 4, 2021)
Sixth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2021, by and between Andrew P. Stone
and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.3, filed
on August 4, 2021)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2021, by and between Brooke E. Carillo and
the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.4, filed on
August 4, 2021)
Side Letter Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2021, by and between Brooke Carillo and the Registrant (incorporated
by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.3, filed on May 7, 2021)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2021, by and between Sasha G. Macomber
and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.5, filed
on August 4, 2021)
Letter Agreement, between Collin L. Cochrane and the Registrant, dated as of February 28, 2020 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.77, filed on March 2, 2020)
Redwood Trust, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, dated November 3, 2020 (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.5, filed on August 4, 2021)
Office Building Lease, effective as of and dated as of June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1, filed November 3, 2011)
First Amendment to Lease, effective as of May 25, 2017, between AG-SKB Belvedere Owner, L.P. and the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1, filed on
August 4, 2017)
Second Amendment to Lease, effective as of December 27, 2017, between AG-SKB Belvedere Owner, L.P. and
the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.30, filed on
February 28, 2018)
Lease Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2013, between MG-Point, LLC, as Landlord, and the Registrant, as
Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.22, filed on
February 26, 2013)
First Amendment to Lease, effective as of June 27, 2013, between MG-Point, LLC, as Landlord, and the
Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.4,
filed August 8, 2013)
Second Amendment to Lease, effective as of June 23, 2014, between MG-Point, LLC, as Landlord, and the
Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.7,
filed August 8, 2014)
Third Amendment to Lease, effective as of January 22, 2020, between ARTIS HRA Inverness Point, LP
(successor-in-interest to MG-Point, LLC), as Landlord, and the Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.38, filed on March 2, 2020)
Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2020, between ARTIS HRA Inverness Point, LP, as
Landlord, and the Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, Exhibit 10.2, filed on August 7, 2020)
Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2020, between ARTIS HRA Inverness Point, LP, as
Landlord, and the Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, Exhibit 10.3, filed on August 7, 2020)
Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2020, between ARTIS HRA Inverness Point, LP,
as Landlord, and the Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, Exhibit 10.7, filed on August 4, 2021)
Seventh Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2021, between ARTIS HRA Inverness Point, LP, as
Landlord, and the Registrant, as Tenant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, Exhibit 10.8, filed on August 4, 2021)
115
Exhibit
Number
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
21
23
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101
Exhibit
First Amendment to Lease, between Jamboree Center 4 LLC and Redwood Trust, Inc., dated as of December 3,
2021 (filed herewith)
Lease, between Jamboree Center 4 LLC and Redwood Trust, Inc., dated as of December 18, 2020 (incorporated by
reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.38, filed on February 26, 2021)
Distribution Agreement by and among Redwood Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, and JMP Securities LLC, dated November
14, 2018 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.1, filed on
November 15, 2018)
Amendment No. 1 to the Distribution Agreement by and among Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and JMP Securities LLC, dated
May 9, 2019 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.1, filed on May
10, 2019)
Amendment No. 2 to the Distribution Agreement by and among Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and JMP Securities LLC, dated
March 4, 2020 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 1.1, filed on
March 6, 2020)
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP (filed herewith)
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith)
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith)
Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, is filed in XBRL-formatted interactive data files:
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020;
(ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019;
(iii) Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and
2019;
(iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019;
(v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019; and
(vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
* Indicates exhibits that include management contracts or compensatory plan or arrangements.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
116
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: February 25, 2022
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
By:
/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ABATE
Christopher J. Abate
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ABATE
Christopher J. Abate
/s/ BROOKE E. CARILLO
Brooke E. Carillo
/s/ COLLIN L. COCHRANE
Collin L. Cochrane
/s/ RICHARD D. BAUM
Richard D. Baum
/s/ GREG H. KUBICEK
Greg H. Kubicek
/s/ ARMANDO FALCON
Armando Falcon
/s/ DOUGLAS B. HANSEN
Douglas B. Hansen
/s/ DEBORA D. HORVATH
Debora D. Horvath
/s/ GEORGE W. MADISON
George W. Madison
/s/ JEFFREY T. PERO
Jeffrey T. Pero
/s/ GEORGANNE C. PROCTOR
Georganne C. Proctor
/s/ DASHIELL I. ROBINSON
Dashiell I. Robinson
/s/ FAITH A. SCHWARTZ
Faith A. Schwartz
Director and Chief Executive Officer
February 25, 2022
(Principal Executive Officer)
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
Director, Chairman of the Board
February 25, 2022
Director, Vice Chairman of the Board
February 25, 2022
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
February 25, 2022
Director and President
February 25, 2022
Director
February 25, 2022
117
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
For Inclusion in Annual Report on Form 10-K Filed With
Securities and Exchange Commission
December 31, 2021
F- 1
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 248)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 6. Residential Loans
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans
Note 8. Multifamily Loans
Note 9. Real Estate Securities
Note 10. Other Investments
Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments
Note 12. Other Assets and Liabilities
Note 13. Short-Term Debt
Note 14. Asset-Backed Securities Issued
Note 15. Long-Term Debt
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Note 17. Equity
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans
Note 19. Mortgage Banking Activities
Note 20. Other Income
Note 21. General and Administrative Expenses, Loan Acquisition Costs, and Other Expenses
Note 22. Taxes
Note 23. Segment Information
Note 24: Subsequent Events
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Page
F-3
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
F-12
F-12
F-13
F-18
F-34
F-41
F-56
F-65
F-73
F-75
F-80
F-83
F-85
F-88
F-90
F-93
F-98
F-102
F-104
F-110
F-111
F-112
F-114
F-117
F-121
F-122
F- 2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Redwood Trust, Inc.
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Redwood Trust, Inc. (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries
(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income
(loss), changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the
related notes and financial statement schedule included under Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
("PCAOB"), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the
2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
("COSO"), and our report dated February 25, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to
be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or
fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical audit matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of
critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or
disclosures to which it relates.
Fair value measurements of certain real estate securities, and beneficial interests in consolidated Sequoia and Freddie Mac Seasoned
Loans Structured Transaction (“SLST”) securitization entities holding residential loans, consolidated CoreVest American Finance
Lender (“CAFL”) securitization entities holding business purpose loans, and consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series securitization
entities holding multifamily loans.
As described further in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company owns real estate securities, which are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Some of these real estate securities result in the consolidation of the underlying
securitization entities as required by ASC 810, Consolidation. The Company has elected to account for consolidated securitization
entities as Collateralized Finance Entities (“CFEs”) and has elected to measure the financial assets of its CFEs using the fair value of
the financial liabilities issued by those entities, which management has determined to be more observable. The real estate securities
and beneficial interests in consolidated securitization entities, are priced individually by the Company utilizing market comparable
pricing and discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques.
F- 3
We identified the fair value measurements of certain investment securities, specifically certain subordinate securities, as well the
beneficial interests in consolidated Sequoia and SLST securitization entities holding residential loans, consolidated CAFL
securitization entities holding business purpose loans, and consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series securitization entities holding
multifamily loans (together, “Investments”) as a critical audit matter.
The principal considerations for our determination that the fair value measurement of these Investments was a critical audit matter
are as follows. There is limited observable market data available for these Investments as they trade infrequently and, as such, the fair
value measurement requires management to make complex judgments in order to identify and select the significant assumptions,
which include the discount rate, prepayment rate, default rate and loss severity. In addition, the fair value measurements of the
Investments are highly sensitive to changes in the significant assumptions and underlying market conditions and are material to the
consolidated financial statements. As a result, obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence related to the fair value measurements
required significant auditor subjectivity.
Our audit procedures related to the fair value measurements of these Investments included the following, among others. We tested
the design and operating effectiveness of relevant controls including, among others, management’s validation of the inputs to the
valuations, and management’s review of the significant assumptions against available market data. Further, we involved firm valuation
specialists to independently determine the fair value measurement for a sample of the Investments and compared them to
management’s fair value measurement for reasonableness.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.
Newport Beach, California
February 25, 2022
F- 4
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Redwood Trust, Inc.
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Redwood Trust, Inc. (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries
(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in the
2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
("PCAOB"), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and our report
dated February 25, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Newport Beach, California
February 25, 2022
\
F- 5
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, except Share Data)
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
ASSETS (1)
Residential loans, held-for-sale, at fair value
Residential loans, held-for-investment, at fair value
Business purpose loans, held-for-sale, at fair value
Business purpose loans, held-for-investment, at fair value
Multifamily loans, held-for-investment, at fair value
Real estate securities, at fair value
Other investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Intangible assets
Derivative assets
Other assets
Total Assets
Liabilities
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (1)
$
1,845,282 $
5,747,150
358,309
4,432,680
473,514
377,411
641,969
450,485
80,999
41,561
26,467
231,117
176,641
4,072,410
245,394
3,890,959
492,221
344,125
348,175
461,260
83,190
56,865
53,238
130,588
$
14,706,944 $
10,355,066
Short-term debt
Derivative liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Asset-backed securities issued (includes $8,843,147 and $6,900,362 at fair value), net
Long-term debt, net
$
Total liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 16)
Equity
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 395,000,000 shares authorized; 114,892,309
and 112,090,006 issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
Cumulative earnings
Cumulative distributions to stockholders
Total equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
2,177,362 $
3,317
245,788
9,253,557
1,640,833
13,320,857
1,149
2,316,799
(8,927)
1,316,890
(2,239,824)
1,386,087
522,609
16,072
179,340
7,100,661
1,425,485
9,244,167
1,121
2,264,874
(4,221)
997,277
(2,148,152)
1,110,899
$
14,706,944 $
10,355,066
——————
(1) Our consolidated balance sheets include assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) that can only be used to settle obligations of
these VIEs and liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors do not have recourse to Redwood Trust, Inc. or its affiliates. At December 31,
2021 and 2020, assets of consolidated VIEs totaled $10,661,081 and $8,141,069, respectively. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, liabilities of
consolidated VIEs totaled $9,619,347 and $7,148,414, respectively. See Note 4 for further discussion.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 6
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands, except Share Data)
2021
2020
2019
Years Ended December 31,
$
204,801 $
222,746 $
Interest Income
Residential loans
Business purpose loans
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Other interest income
Total interest income
Interest Expense
Short-term debt
Asset-backed securities issued
Long-term debt
Total interest expense
Net Interest Income
Non-interest Income (Loss)
Mortgage banking activities, net
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest income (loss), net
General and administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expenses
Net Income (Loss) before (Provision for) Benefit from
Income Taxes
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
$
$
$
270,791
19,266
54,704
25,364
574,926
(42,581)
(305,801)
(78,367)
(426,749)
148,177
235,744
128,049
12,018
17,993
393,804
(170,859)
(16,336)
(16,695)
338,091
(18,478)
319,613 $
2.73 $
2.37 $
217,617
54,813
49,605
27,135
571,916
(50,895)
(299,708)
(97,402)
(448,005)
123,911
78,472
(588,438)
4,188
30,424
(475,354)
(115,204)
(11,023)
(108,785)
(586,455)
4,608
(581,847) $
(5.12) $
(5.12) $
113,230,190
142,070,301
113,935,605
113,935,605
315,953
53,805
132,600
91,822
28,101
622,281
(96,506)
(294,466)
(88,836)
(479,808)
142,473
87,266
35,500
19,257
23,821
165,844
(108,737)
(9,935)
(13,022)
176,623
(7,440)
169,183
1.63
1.46
101,120,744
136,780,594
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 7
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands)
Net Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
Reclassification of unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities to
net income (loss)
Net unrealized loss on interest rate agreements
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate agreements to net
income
Total other comprehensive loss
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
$
319,613 $
(581,847) $
169,183
8,016
(3,951)
17,077
(16,849)
—
4,127
(4,706)
(12,165)
(32,806)
3,188
(45,734)
$
314,907 $
(627,581) $
(19,967)
(16,894)
—
(19,784)
149,399
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 8
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
(In Thousands, except Share
Data)
December 31, 2020
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Issuance of common stock
2,503,662
Employee stock purchase and
incentive plans
298,641
Non-cash equity award
compensation
Share repurchases
Common dividends declared
($0.780 per share)
December 31, 2021
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Cumulative
Earnings
Cumulative
Distributions
to Stockholders
Total
112,090,006 $
1,121 $
2,264,874 $
(4,221) $
997,277 $
(2,148,152) $
1,110,899
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
25
3
—
—
—
—
—
34,683
(1,660)
18,902
—
—
—
319,613
(4,706)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
319,613
(4,706)
34,708
(1,657)
18,902
—
(91,672)
(91,672)
114,892,309 $
1,149 $
2,316,799 $
(8,927) $
1,316,890 $
(2,239,824) $
1,386,087
(In Thousands, except Share
Data)
December 31, 2019
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss
Issuance of common stock
Direct stock purchase and
dividend reinvestment plan
Employee stock purchase and
incentive plans
Non-cash equity award
compensation
Common dividends declared
($0.725 per share)
December 31, 2020
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Cumulative
Earnings
Cumulative
Distributions
to Stockholders
Total
114,353,036 $
1,144 $
2,269,617 $
41,513 $
1,579,124 $
(2,064,167) $
1,827,231
—
—
350,088
—
434,217
—
—
—
—
3
—
4
—
(30)
—
—
—
5,544
—
(3,956)
15,298
(21,629)
—
—
(581,847)
(45,734)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(581,847)
(45,734)
5,547
—
(3,952)
15,298
(21,659)
(83,985)
(83,985)
112,090,006 $
1,121 $
2,264,874 $
(4,221) $
997,277 $
(2,148,152) $
1,110,899
Share repurchases
(3,047,335)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
(In Thousands, except Share
Data)
December 31, 2018
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Issuance of common stock:
Dividend reinvestment & stock
purchase plans
Employee stock purchase and
incentive plans
Non-cash equity award
compensation
Share repurchases
Common dividends declared
($1.20 per share)
December 31, 2019
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Cumulative
Earnings
Cumulative
Distributions
to Stockholders
Total
84,884,344 $
849 $
1,811,422 $
61,297 $
1,409,941 $
(1,934,715) $
1,348,794
—
—
28,724,645
399,838
344,209
—
—
—
—
—
288
4
3
—
—
—
—
—
441,884
6,303
(4,949)
14,957
—
—
—
169,183
(19,784)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
169,183
(19,784)
442,172
6,307
(4,946)
14,957
—
(129,452)
(129,452)
114,353,036 $
1,144 $
2,269,617 $
41,513 $
1,579,124 $
(2,064,167) $
1,827,231
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 9
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
$
319,613 $
(581,847) $
169,183
(9,789)
16,784
(1,258,115)
(13,188,434)
8,639,769
84,244
44,755
18,902
—
(321,433)
(17,993)
8,550
17,365
(1,004,058)
(4,431,468)
4,776,469
62,736
(201,036)
15,298
88,675
541,399
(30,424)
(5,066)
10,133
(569,915)
(5,823,547)
5,198,089
106,183
(66,059)
14,957
—
(97,006)
(23,821)
(64,835)
301,381
(83,210)
41,967
(5,694,565)
(68,507)
(505,467)
4,502
(1,165,577)
(894,908)
(65,315)
9,484
2,601,416
(68,643)
—
—
8,197
39,652
60,667
(196,583)
76,223
—
—
—
(133,547)
(32,547)
1,404,096
(426,404)
—
1,574,160
2,256,196
(112,626)
—
—
142,990
658,899
27,210
(179,419)
107,527
—
—
40,226
734
(19,079)
4,070,414
(448,189)
(49,489)
9,422
1,751,303
(345,403)
(193,212)
(99,221)
—
707,357
84,303
(69,610)
203,876
(3,714)
(451,626)
(40,467)
—
(29,468)
1,025,862
(In Thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of premiums, discounts, and debt issuance costs, net
Depreciation and amortization of non-financial assets
Originations of held-for-sale loans
Purchases of held-for-sale loans
Proceeds from sales of held-for-sale loans
Principal payments on held-for-sale loans
Net settlements of derivatives
Non-cash equity award compensation expense
Goodwill impairment expense
Market valuation adjustments
Realized gains, net
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
Accrued interest payable, deferred tax liabilities, and accrued expenses and other
liabilities
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Originations of loans held-for-investment
Purchases of loans held-for-investment
Proceeds from sales of loans held-for-investment
Principal payments on loans held-for-investment
Purchases of real estate securities
Purchases of residential securities held in consolidated securitization trust
Purchases of multifamily securities held in consolidated securitization trusts
Sales of multifamily securities held in consolidated securitization trusts
Proceeds from sales of real estate securities
Principal payments on real estate securities
Purchases of servicer advance investments
Principal repayments from servicer advance investments
Acquisition of 5 Arches, net of cash acquired
Acquisition of CoreVest, net of cash acquired
Equity investment
Purchases of home equity investments, net
Other investing activities, net
Net cash provided by investing activities
F- 10
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(In Thousands)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on short-term debt
Repayments on short-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of asset-backed securities
Repayments on asset-backed securities issued
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Deferred debt issuance costs
Repayments on long-term debt
Net settlements of derivatives
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
Net payments on repurchase of common stock
Taxes paid on equity award distributions
Dividends paid
Other financing activities, net
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period (1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (1)
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
Taxes
Supplemental Noncash Information:
Real estate securities retained from loan securitizations
Retention of mortgage servicing rights from loan securitizations and sales
Consolidation of residential loans held in securitization trust
Consolidation of residential ABS issued
(Deconsolidation) consolidation of multifamily loans held in securitization trusts
(Deconsolidation) consolidation of multifamily ABS issued
Consolidation of single-family rental loans held in securitization trusts
Consolidation of single-family rental ABS issued
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-for-investment
Transfers from loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-sale
Transfers from residential loans to real estate owned
Issuance of common stock for 5 Arches acquisition
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities
Reduction in operating lease liabilities due to lease modification
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
13,235,028
(11,404,475)
4,472,071
(1,989,762)
1,455,383
(4,089)
(1,421,662)
—
21,944
—
(2,267)
(91,672)
7,004
4,277,503
(12,966)
544,450
531,484 $
$
5,496,761
(7,303,543)
1,684,778
(1,493,438)
1,473,590
(10,244)
(2,974,795)
(84,336)
5,881
(21,659)
(4,286)
(83,985)
3,946
(3,311,330)
253,617
290,833
544,450 $
6,452,566
(7,193,677)
1,397,126
(1,123,119)
387,053
(7,023)
(1,137)
—
450,710
—
(5,471)
(129,452)
(2,105)
225,471
85,756
205,077
290,833
$
$
400,836 $
43,144
456,147 $
1,190
452,216
7,963
9,375 $
7,065
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,026,723
92,400
40,038
13,375
6,977
—
53,276 $
—
—
—
(3,849,779)
(3,706,789)
—
—
1,868,656
64,520
14,229
3,375
7,862
1,722
13,729
868
1,190,995
997,783
2,162,385
2,058,214
1,829,281
1,656,023
1,801,560
22,808
8,609
—
13,094
—
(1) Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at December 31, 2021 included cash and cash equivalents of $450 million and restricted cash of $81 million; at
December 31, 2020 included cash and cash equivalents of $461 million and restricted cash of $83 million; and at December 31, 2019 included cash and cash
equivalents of $197 million and restricted cash of $94 million.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 11
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 1. Organization
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a specialty finance company focused on several distinct areas of housing
credit. Our operating platforms occupy a unique position in the housing finance value chain, providing liquidity to growing segments
of the U.S. housing market not well served by government programs. We deliver customized housing credit investments to a diverse
mix of investors through our best-in-class securitization platforms, whole-loan distribution activities and our publicly-traded securities.
Our aggregation, origination and investment activities have evolved to incorporate a diverse mix of residential, business purpose and
multifamily assets. Our goal is to provide attractive returns to shareholders through a stable and growing stream of earnings and
dividends, capital appreciation, and a commitment to technological innovation that facilitates risk-minded scale. We operate our
business in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking, and Investment Portfolio.
Our primary sources of income are net interest income from our investments and non-interest income from our mortgage banking
activities. Net interest income primarily consists of the interest income we earn on investments less the interest expense we incur on
borrowed funds and other liabilities. Income from mortgage banking activities is generated through the origination and acquisition of
loans, and their subsequent sale, securitization, or transfer to our investment portfolios.
Redwood Trust, Inc. has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994. We generally refer,
collectively, to Redwood Trust, Inc. and those of its subsidiaries that are generally not subject to subsidiary-level corporate income tax
as “the REIT” or “our REIT.” We generally refer to subsidiaries of Redwood Trust, Inc. that are subject to subsidiary-level corporate
income tax as “our taxable REIT subsidiaries” or “TRS.”
Redwood was incorporated in the State of Maryland on April 11, 1994, and commenced operations on August 19, 1994. On
March 1, 2019, Redwood completed the acquisition of 5 Arches, LLC ("5 Arches"), at which time 5 Arches became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Redwood. On October 15, 2019, Redwood acquired CoreVest American Finance Lender, LLC and certain affiliated
entities ("CoreVest"), at which time CoreVest became wholly owned by Redwood. The operations of 5 Arches were subsequently
combined with those of CoreVest under the CoreVest brand. References herein to “Redwood,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” and “our”
include Redwood Trust, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. In statements regarding
qualification as a REIT, such terms refer solely to Redwood Trust, Inc. Refer to Item 1 - Business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for additional information on our business.
F- 12
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 2. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements presented herein are at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and for the years ended December 31,
2021, 2020, and 2019. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP") — as prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) — and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of
management, all normal and recurring adjustments to present fairly the financial condition of the Company at December 31, 2021 and
2020, and results of operations for all periods presented have been made.
Principles of Consolidation
In accordance with GAAP, we determine whether we must consolidate transferred financial assets and variable interest entities
(“VIEs”) for financial reporting purposes. We currently consolidate the assets and liabilities of certain Sequoia securitization entities
issued prior to 2012 ("Legacy Sequoia"), certain entities formed during and after 2012 in connection with the securitization of
Redwood Select prime loans and Redwood Choice expanded-prime loans ("Sequoia"), entities formed in connection with the
securitization of CoreVest single-family rental and bridge loans ("CAFL"), and beginning in the third quarter of 2021, an entity
("Point HEI") formed in connection with the securitization of home equity investment contracts ("HEIs"). We also consolidate the
assets and liabilities of certain Freddie Mac K-Series and Freddie Mac Seasoned Loans Structured Transaction ("SLST")
securitizations in which we have invested. Each securitization entity is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and
liabilities are not owned by and are not legal obligations of Redwood Trust, Inc. Our exposure to these entities is primarily through the
financial interests we have purchased or retained, although for certain entities we are exposed to financial risks associated with our
role as a sponsor or co-sponsor, servicing administrator, collateral administrator or depositor of these entities or as a result of our
having sold assets directly or indirectly to these entities.
For financial reporting purposes, the underlying loans owned at the consolidated Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia and Freddie Mac SLST
entities are shown under Residential loans held-for-investment, at fair value, the underlying loans at the consolidated Freddie Mac K-
Series entity are shown under Multifamily loans held-for-investment, at fair value, the underlying single-family rental and bridge loans
at the consolidated CAFL entities are shown under Business purpose loans held-for-investment, at fair value, and the underlying HEIs
at the consolidated Point HEI entity are shown under Other investments, at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. The asset-
backed securities (“ABS”) issued to third parties by these entities are shown under ABS issued. In our consolidated statements of
income (loss), we recorded interest income on the loans owned at these entities and interest expense on the ABS issued by these
entities as well as fair value changes, other income and expenses associated with these entities' activities. See Note 14 for further
discussion on ABS issued.
We also consolidate two partnerships ("Servicing Investment" entities) through which we have invested in servicing-related
assets. We maintain an 80% ownership interest in each entity and have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of these
partnerships.
During the first quarter of 2020, we sold subordinate securities (and transferred directing certificate holder status as a result of
these sales) issued by four of these Freddie Mac K-Series securitization trusts and determined that we should derecognize the
associated assets and liabilities of each of these entities for financial reporting purposes. We deconsolidated $3.86 billion of
multifamily loans and other assets and $3.72 billion of multifamily ABS issued and other liabilities, for which we realized market
valuation losses of $72 million, which were recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of
income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, we consolidated 5 Arches, an originator of business purpose loans, pursuant to the exercise
of our purchase option and the acquisition of the remaining equity in the company. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we acquired and
consolidated CoreVest, an originator and portfolio manager of business purpose loans.
See Note 4 for further discussion on principles of consolidation.
F- 13
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 2. Basis of Presentation - (continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make a number of significant estimates. These include estimates of fair
value of certain assets and liabilities, amounts and timing of credit losses, prepayment rates, and other estimates that affect the
reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
certain revenues and expenses during the reported periods. It is likely that changes in these estimates (e.g., valuation changes due to
supply and demand, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons) will occur in the near term. Our estimates are
inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from our estimates and the differences could be material.
Acquisitions
In May 2018, Redwood acquired a 20% minority interest in 5 Arches, an originator of business purpose loans, for $10 million in
cash, with a one-year option to purchase all remaining equity in the company. On March 1, 2019, we completed the acquisition of the
remaining 80% interest in 5 Arches. At closing, we paid approximately $13 million of cash, with the remaining $27 million in
consideration paid in a mix of cash and Redwood common stock over the subsequent two-year period.
In October 2019, we acquired CoreVest, an originator and portfolio manager of business purpose loans. Aggregate consideration
for this acquisition totaled approximately $492 million, net of in-place financing on existing assets. The consideration consisted of
$482 million of cash and $10 million of restricted stock awards issued to the CoreVest management team. Based on the terms of the
equity interest purchase agreement, we determined that the $10 million of shares should be accounted for as compensation expense for
post-combination services, and therefore, it is not included in the GAAP purchase price allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired.
See Note 21 for additional information related to the restricted stock awards issued in connection with the CoreVest acquisition.
F- 14
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 2. Basis of Presentation - (continued)
During 2019, we accounted for the acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest under the acquisition method of accounting pursuant to
ASC 805. We performed the purchase price allocations and recorded underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
estimated fair values using the information available as of each acquisition date, with the excess of the purchase price allocated to
goodwill. Through December 31, 2021, there were no changes to our purchase price allocations, which are summarized in the
following table.
Table 2.1 – Purchase Price Allocations
(In Thousands)
Acquisition Date
Purchase price:
Cash
Contingent consideration, at fair value
Purchase option, at fair value
Equity method investment, at fair value
Total consideration
Allocated to:
Business purpose loans, at fair value
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Other assets
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Deferred tax asset
Total assets acquired
Asset-backed securities issued, at fair value
Short-term debt, net
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Deferred tax liability
Total liabilities assumed
Total net assets acquired
5 Arches
March 1, 2019
CoreVest
October 15, 2019
$
$
$
12,575 $
482,311
24,621
5,082
8,052
—
—
—
50,330 $
482,311
2,022 $
2,610,490
2,128
9,082
5,473
28,747
24,800
—
72,252
—
3,800
13,920
4,202
21,922
$
50,330 $
30,685
—
67,420
59,928
56,500
2,577
2,827,600
1,656,023
663,275
25,991
—
2,345,289
482,311
Because we owned a 20% non-controlling interest in 5 Arches immediately before obtaining full control, we remeasured our
initial minority investment and purchase option at their acquisition-date fair values using the income approach, which resulted in a
gain of $2 million that was recorded in Other income on our consolidated statements of income (loss) during the three months ended
March 31, 2019.
We recognized $2 million of acquisition costs related our acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest during the year ended December
31, 2019. These costs primarily related to accounting, consulting, and legal expenses and are included in our General and
administrative expenses on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 15
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 2. Basis of Presentation - (continued)
In connection with the acquisitions of 5 Arches and CoreVest, we identified and recorded finite-lived intangible assets totaling
$25 million and $57 million, respectively. The table below presents the amortization period and carrying value of our intangible assets,
net of accumulated amortization at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 2.2 – Intangible Assets – Activity
(Dollars in Thousands)
Borrower network
Broker network
Non-compete agreements
Tradenames
Developed technology
Loan administration fees on existing loan assets
Intangible Assets
at Acquisition
Accumulated
Amortization at
December 31, 2021
Carrying Value at
December 31, 2021
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (in years)
$
45,300 $
18,100
9,500
4,000
1,800
2,600
(14,291) $
(10,257)
(7,597)
(3,194)
(1,800)
(2,600)
31,009
7,843
1,903
806
—
—
Intangible Assets
at Acquisition
Accumulated
Amortization at
December 31, 2020
Carrying Value at
December 31, 2020
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (in years)
Total
$
81,300 $
(39,739) $
41,561
(Dollars in Thousands)
Borrower network
Broker network
Non-compete agreements
Tradenames
Developed technology
Loan administration fees on existing loan assets
$
45,300 $
18,100
9,500
4,000
1,800
2,600
(7,819) $
(6,637)
(4,431)
(1,860)
(1,088)
(2,600)
37,481
11,463
5,069
2,140
712
—
Total
$
81,300 $
(24,435) $
56,865
7
5
3
3
2
1
6
7
5
3
3
2
1
6
All of our intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded
intangible asset amortization expense of $15 million and $16 million, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense is
summarized in the table below.
Table 2.3 – Intangible Asset Amortization Expense by Year
(In Thousands)
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Total Future Intangible Asset Amortization
December 31, 2021
$
$
12,800
10,091
7,073
6,471
5,126
41,561
We recorded total goodwill of $89 million in 2019 as a result of the total consideration exceeding the fair value of the net assets
acquired from 5 Arches and CoreVest. The goodwill was attributed to the expected business synergies and expansion into business
purpose loan markets, as well as access to the knowledgeable and experienced workforces continuing to provide services to the
business. Of the total goodwill recorded, $75 million is deductible for tax purposes. For reporting purposes, we included the intangible
assets and goodwill from these acquisitions within the Business Purpose Lending segment.
F- 16
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 2. Basis of Presentation - (continued)
During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the deterioration in economic conditions caused by the spread of the COVID-19
pandemic (the "pandemic"), and its impact on our business, including a significant decline in the market price of our common stock,
we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking reporting unit was lower
than its carrying amount, including goodwill. Based on this analysis, we determined that an interim goodwill impairment test should
be performed as of March 31, 2020 and prepared updated cash flow projections for the reporting unit, resulting in a reduction in the
long-term forecasts of profitability for our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking reporting unit as compared to the prior year forecasts.
Using these projections, we concluded that the fair value of our Business Purpose Mortgage Banking reporting unit was less than its
carrying value, including goodwill. As a result of this evaluation, we recorded a non-cash $89 million goodwill impairment expense
through Other expenses on our consolidated statements of income (loss) during the three months ended March 31, 2020. In
conjunction with our assessment of goodwill, we also assessed our intangible assets for impairment at March 31, 2020 and determined
they were not impaired.
On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our finite-lived intangible assets for impairment indicators and additionally evaluate the useful
lives of our intangible assets to determine if revisions to the remaining periods of amortization are warranted. We reviewed our finite-
lived intangible assets and determined that the estimated lives were appropriate and that there were no indicators of impairment at
December 31, 2021.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents Net interest income, Non-interest income, and Net income of
Redwood, 5 Arches, and CoreVest combined, for the year ended December 31, 2019, as if the acquisitions occurred as of January 1,
2018. These pro forma amounts have been adjusted to include the amortization of intangible assets and acquisition-related
compensation expense for both periods, and to exclude the income statement impacts related to our equity method investment in 5
Arches. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated financial results
of operations that would have been reported if the acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2018 and should not be taken as
indicative of our future consolidated results of operations.
Table 2.4 – Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
(In Thousands)
Supplementary pro forma information:
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Net income
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
$
167,680
193,519
185,896
F- 17
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Significant Accounting Policies
Business Combinations
We use the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, under which the purchase price is allocated to the fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Fair Value Measurements
Our consolidated financial statements include assets and liabilities that are measured at their estimated fair values in accordance
with GAAP. A fair value measurement represents the price at which an orderly transaction would occur between willing market
participants at the measurement date.
We develop fair values for financial assets or liabilities based on available inputs and pricing that is observed in the marketplace.
After considering all available indications of the appropriate rate of return that market participants would require, we consider the
reasonableness of the range indicated by the results to determine an estimate that is most representative of fair value.
The markets for many of the assets that we invest in and issue are generally illiquid. Establishing fair values for illiquid assets and
liabilities is inherently subjective and is often dependent upon our estimates and modeling assumptions. If we determine that either the
volume and/or level of trading activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased from normal market conditions, or price
quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions, the market inputs that we obtain might not be relevant.
For example, broker or pricing service quotes might not be relevant if an active market does not exist for the financial asset or liability.
The nature of the quote (for example, whether the quote is an indicative price or a binding offer) is also evaluated.
In circumstances where relevant market inputs cannot be obtained, increased analysis and management judgment are required to
estimate fair value. This generally requires us to establish internal assumptions about future cash flows and appropriate risk-adjusted
discount rates. Regardless of the valuation inputs we apply, the objective of fair value measurement for assets is unchanged from what
it would be if markets were operating at normal activity levels and/or transactions were orderly; that is, to determine the current exit
price.
See Note 5 for further discussion on fair value measurements.
Fair Value Option
We have the option to measure eligible financial assets, financial liabilities, and commitments at fair value on an instrument-by-
instrument basis. This option is available when we first recognize a financial asset or financial liability or enter into a firm
commitment. Subsequent changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities, and commitments where we have elected the fair value option
are recorded in our consolidated statements of income (loss).
We elect the fair value option for certain residential loans, business purpose loans, interest-only (“IO”) and certain subordinate
securities, MSRs, servicer advance investments, excess MSRs, and certain of our other investments. We generally elect the fair value
option for residential and single-family rental loans that are held-for-sale, due to our intent to sell or securitize the loans in the near-
term. We elect the fair value option for our IO and certain subordinate securities, and MSRs, for which we may hedge market interest
rate risk. In addition, we elect the fair value option for the assets and liabilities of our consolidated Sequoia, Freddie Mac SLST,
Freddie Mac K-Series, CAFL SFR, and Point HEI entities in accordance with GAAP accounting for collateralized financing entities
("CFEs").
See Note 5 for further discussion on the fair value option.
F-18
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Real Estate Loans
Residential Loans - Held-for-Sale at Fair Value
Residential loans held-for-sale include loans that we are marketing for sale to third parties, including transfers to securitization
entities that we plan to sponsor. We generally elect the fair value option for residential loans that we purchase with the intent to sell to
third parties or transfer to Sequoia securitizations. Coupon interest is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or
until a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, at which point the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any accrued interest is
reversed against interest income. When a seriously delinquent loan previously placed on nonaccrual status has cured, meaning all
delinquent principal and interest have been remitted by the borrower, the loan is placed back on accrual status. Changes in fair value
for these loans are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Mortgage banking activities, net.
Residential Loans - Held-for-Investment At Fair Value
Certain loans that were originally purchased with the intent to sell as part of our residential mortgage banking operations, and for
which we elected the fair value option at acquisition, were subsequently reclassified to held-for-investment ("HFI"). Coupon interest is
recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, at which point the
loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any accrued interest is reversed against interest income. When a seriously delinquent loan
previously placed on nonaccrual status has cured, meaning all delinquent principal and interest have been remitted by the borrower,
the loan is placed back on accrual status. During 2020, we completed the sale of all of our residential loans previously held for
investment at Redwood and had no residential loans held-for-investment at Redwood at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
In addition, we record residential loans held at consolidated Sequoia and Freddie Mac SLST entities at fair value. In accordance
with accounting guidance for CFEs, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities (which we determined to be more
observable) to determine the fair value of the loans held at these entities. Coupon interest for these loans is recognized as revenue
when earned and deemed collectible. Changes in fair value for these loans are recurring and are reported through our consolidated
statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net.
Business Purpose Loans - Held-for-Sale at Fair Value
We originate or purchase business purpose loans, including single-family rental loans through our business purpose lending
platform. Single-family rental loans are mortgage loans secured by residential real estate (primarily 1-4 unit) that the borrower owns as
an investment property and rents to residential tenants. We classify single-family rental loans as held-for-sale at fair value when we
originate these loans with the intent to transfer to securitization entities or sell to third parties.
Coupon interest for these loans is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than
90 days past due, at which point the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any accrued interest is reversed against interest income.
When a seriously delinquent loan previously placed on nonaccrual status has cured, meaning all delinquent principal and interest have
been remitted by the borrower, the loan is placed back on accrual status. Changes in fair value are recurring and reported through our
consolidated statements of income (loss) in Mortgage banking activities, net.
Business Purpose Loans - Held-for-Investment at Fair Value
We also originate or purchase bridge loans through our business purpose lending platform. Business purpose bridge loans are
mortgage loans generally secured by unoccupied residential or small-balance multifamily real estate that the borrower owns as an
investment and that is being renovated, rehabilitated or constructed. Bridge loans are classified as held-for-investment at fair value if
we intend to hold these loans to maturity.
Coupon interest for these loans is recognized as revenue when earned and deemed collectible or until a loan becomes more than
90 days past due, at which point the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any accrued interest is reversed against interest income.
When a seriously delinquent loan previously placed on nonaccrual status has cured, meaning all delinquent principal and interest have
been remitted by the borrower, the loan is placed back on accrual status. Changes in fair value for these loans are recurring and are
reported through our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net.
F- 19
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
In addition, we record loans held at consolidated CAFL SFR entities at fair value. In accordance with accounting guidance for
CFEs, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities (which we determined to be more observable) to determine the fair
value of the loans held at these entities. Coupon interest for these loans is recognized as revenue based on amounts expected to be paid
to the securities issued by these entities. Changes in fair value for these loans and related ABS are recurring and are reported through
our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net.
Multifamily Loans, Held-for-Investment at Fair Value
Multifamily loans are mortgage loans secured by multifamily properties, held in a Freddie Mac-sponsored K-series securitization
trust that we consolidate. In accordance with accounting guidance for CFEs, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by the Freddie
Mac K-Series entity (which we determined to be more observable) to determine the fair value of the loans. Coupon interest for these
loans is recognized as revenue based on amounts expected to be paid to the securities issued by this entity. Changes in fair value for
the loans and related ABS are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value
changes, net.
Repurchase Reserves
We sell and have sold residential and business purpose mortgage loans to various parties, including (1) securitization trusts, and
(2) banks and other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. We may be
required to repurchase mortgage loans we have sold, or loans associated with MSRs we have purchased, in the event of a breach of
specified contractual representations and warranties made in connection with these sales and purchases. Additionally, we generally
have a direct obligation to repurchase residential whole loans we sell in the event of any early payment defaults (or EPDs) by the
underlying mortgage borrowers within certain specified periods following the sales.
We do not originate residential mortgage loans and believe the initial risk of loss due to loan repurchases (i.e., due to a breach of
representations and warranties) would generally be a contingency to the companies from whom we acquired the loans or MSRs.
However, in some cases, such as where loans or MSRs were acquired from companies that have since become insolvent, we may have
to bear the loss associated with a loan repurchase. Furthermore, even if we do not have to ultimately bear such a loss because we can
recover from the company that sold us the loan or the MSR, there could be a delay in making that recovery.
We establish reserves for mortgage repurchase liabilities related to various representations and warranties that reflect
management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have a repurchase obligation, based on a combination of factors. Such
factors can include estimated future defaults and loan repurchase rates, the potential severity of loss in the event of defaults, and the
probability of our being liable for a repurchase obligation. We establish a reserve at the time loans are sold and MSRs are purchased
and continually update our reserve estimate during its life. The reserve for mortgage loan repurchase losses is included in other
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and the related expense is included as a component of Mortgage banking activities, net
on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
See Note 16 for further discussion on the residential repurchase reserves.
Real Estate Securities, at Fair Value
Our securities primarily consist of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) collateralized by residential loans, re-performing loans
("RPL") and multifamily mortgage loans. We classify our real estate securities as trading or available-for-sale securities.
Trading Securities
We primarily denote trading securities as those securities where we have adopted the fair value option. Trading securities are
carried at their estimated fair values. Coupon interest is recognized as interest income when earned and deemed collectible. Changes in
the fair value of securities designated as trading securities are reported in Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
F- 20
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Available-for-Sale Securities
AFS securities are carried at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings (except when an
allowance for credit losses is recognized, as discussed below) and reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(“AOCI”), a component of stockholders’ equity.
Interest income on AFS securities is accrued based on their outstanding principal balance and contractual terms and interest
income is recognized based on the security’s effective interest rate. In order to calculate the effective interest rate, we must project
cash flows over the remaining life of each security and make assumptions with regards to interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing
and amount of credit losses, estimated call dates and other factors. On at least a quarterly basis, we review and, if appropriate, make
adjustments to our cash flow projections based on input and analysis received from external sources, internal models, and our own
judgments about interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and other factors. Changes in cash flows from
those originally projected, or from those estimated at the last evaluation, may result in a prospective change in the yield and interest
income recognized on these securities or in the recognition of an allowance for credit losses as discussed below.
For AFS securities purchased and held at a discount, a portion of the discount may be designated as non-accretable purchase
discount (“credit reserve”), based on the cash flows we have projected for the security. The amount designated as credit reserve may
be adjusted over time, based on our periodic evaluation of projected cash flows. If the performance of a security with a credit reserve
is more favorable than previously forecasted, a portion of the credit reserve may be reallocated to accretable discount and recognized
into interest income over time. Conversely, if the performance of a security with a credit reserve is less favorable than forecasted, the
amount designated as credit reserve may be increased, or impairment charges and write-downs of such securities to a new cost basis
could result.
Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses" in the first quarter of 2020, we modified our policy for
recording impairments on available-for-sale securities. This guidance requires that credit impairments on our available-for-sale
securities be recorded in earnings using an allowance for credit losses, with the allowance limited to the amount by which the
security's fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses is calculated using a discounted cash flow
approach and is measured as the difference between the beneficial interest’s amortized cost and the estimate of cash flows expected to
be collected, discounted at the effective interest rate used to accrete the beneficial interest. Any allowance for credit losses in excess of
the unrealized losses on the beneficial interests are accounted for as a prospective reduction of the effective interest rate. No allowance
is recorded for beneficial interests in an unrealized gain position. Favorable changes in the discounted cash flows will result in a
reduction in the allowance for credit losses, if any. Any reduction in allowance for credit losses is recorded in earnings. If the
allowance for credit losses has been reduced to zero, the remaining favorable changes are reflected as a prospective increase to the
effective interest rate. If we intend to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before it recovers in
value, the entire impairment amount will be recognized in earnings with a corresponding adjustment to the security's amortized cost
basis.
See Note 9 for further discussion on real estate securities.
Other Investments
Strategic Investments
We have made and may make additional strategic investments in companies through our RWT Horizons venture investment
strategy or at a corporate level. These investments can take the form of equity or debt and often have conversion features. Depending
on the terms of the investments, we may account for these investments under the fair value option or as non-marketable equity
securities under the equity method of accounting or the measurement alternative (to the extent they do not have a “readily
determinable fair value,” or are not traded in a verifiable public market or are restricted for sale in the public market by a restricted
stock legend or otherwise).
Investments accounted for under the fair value option are carried at fair value with periodic changes in value recorded through
Investment fair value changes on our consolidated statements of income (loss). For non-marketable securities, we utilize the equity
method of accounting when we are able to exert significant influence over but do not control the activities of the investee. Under the
equity method of accounting, we generally elect to record our share of earnings or losses from equity method investments on a one-
F- 21
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
quarter lag, based on availability of financial information from investees, and we assess our investments for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our investment might not be recoverable. Income from equity
method investments is recorded in Other income, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss). Under the measurement
alternative, the carrying value of our investment is measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from
observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Adjustments are
determined primarily based on a market approach as of the transaction date and are recorded as a component of Other income, net on
our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Servicer Advance Investments
Our servicer advance investments are comprised of outstanding servicer advances receivable, the requirement to purchase all
future servicer advances made with respect to a specified pool of residential mortgage loans and a fee component of the related MSR.
We have elected to record these investments at fair value. We recognize income from our servicer advance investments when earned
and deemed collectible and record the income as a component of Other interest income in our consolidated statements of income
(loss). Our servicer advance investments are marked-to-market on a recurring basis with changes in the fair value reported in
Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
See Note 10 for further discussion on our servicer advance investments.
MSRs
We recognize MSRs through the retention of servicing rights associated with residential mortgage loans that we acquired and
subsequently transferred to third parties when the transfer meets the GAAP criteria for sale accounting, or through the direct
acquisition of MSRs sold by third parties.
We contract with licensed sub-servicers to perform servicing functions for loans associated with our MSRs. We have elected the
fair value option for all of our MSRs, and they are initially recognized and subsequently carried at their estimated fair values.
Servicing fee income from MSRs is recorded on a cash basis when received. Net servicing income and changes in the estimated fair
value of MSRs are reported in Other income on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
See Note 10 for further discussion on MSRs.
Excess MSRs
Our excess MSR investments represent the right to receive a portion of mortgage servicing cash flows in excess of amounts paid
for the underlying mortgage loans to be serviced. As owners of excess MSRs, we are not required to be a licensed servicer, and we are
not required to assume any servicing duties, advance obligations or liabilities associated with the loan pool underlying the MSR. We
have elected to record these investments at fair value. We recognize income from Excess MSRs when it is earned and deemed
collectible and record the income as a component of Other interest income in our consolidated statements of income (loss). Changes in
fair value are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Investment fair value changes, net.
See Note 10 for further discussion on excess MSRs.
Home Equity Investment Contracts
During 2019, we began investing in HEIs that allow us to share in both home price appreciation and depreciation. We have
elected to record these investments at fair value and report changes in fair value through Investment fair value changes, net on our
consolidated statements of income (loss).
In addition, we record HEIs held at a consolidated Point HEI securitization entity at fair value. In accordance with accounting
guidance for CFEs, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by this entity (which we determined to be more observable) to determine
the fair value of the HEIs held at this entity. Changes in fair value of the HEI assets held by this entity and the ABS issued by this
entity (including the interest expense component of the ABS issued) is recorded through investment fair value changes on our
consolidated statements of income (loss).
See Note 10 for further discussion on HEIs.
F- 22
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include non-restricted cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less and money market fund investments which are generally invested in U.S. government securities and are available to us on a daily
basis. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions. Accounts at these institutions are
guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 for each bank. The Company is exposed to credit
risk for amounts held in excess of the FDIC limit. The Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily includes cash held at our consolidated Servicing Investment entities, and cash associated with our risk-
sharing transactions with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ("the Agencies"), as well as cash collateral for certain consolidated
securitization entities.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Significant judgment is required to estimate the fair value of intangible assets and in assigning their estimated useful lives.
Accordingly, we typically seek the assistance of independent third-party valuation specialists for significant intangible assets. The fair
value estimates are based on available historical information and on future expectations and assumptions we deem reasonable. We
generally use an income-based valuation method to estimate the fair value of intangible assets, which discounts expected future cash
flows to present value using estimates and assumptions we deem reasonable.
Determining the estimated useful lives of intangible assets also requires judgment. Our assessment as to which intangible assets
are deemed to have finite or indefinite lives is based on several factors including economic barriers of entry for the acquired business,
retention trends, and our operating plans, among other factors. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives on a straight-line basis and reviewed for impairment if indicators are present. Additionally, useful lives are evaluated each
reporting period to determine if revisions to the remaining periods of amortization are warranted.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. We have elected to make the first
day of our fiscal fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for goodwill. Pursuant to our adoption of ASU 2017-04,
"Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment" in the first quarter of 2020, we
modified our goodwill impairment testing policy. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that
the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, based on that assessment, we believe it is more likely than not that
the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we measure the fair value of reporting unit and record a goodwill
impairment charge for the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount
of the goodwill. Any such impairment charges would be recorded through Other expenses on our consolidated statements of income
(loss).
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments we typically utilize include swaps, swaptions, financial futures contracts, and “To Be
Announced” (“TBA”) contracts. These derivatives are primarily used to manage interest rate risk associated with our operations. In
addition, we enter into certain residential loan purchase commitments (“LPCs”), interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs"), and
residential loan forward sale commitments (“FSCs”) that are treated as derivatives for financial reporting purposes. All derivative
financial instruments are recorded at their estimated fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Derivatives with positive fair values
to us are reported as assets and derivatives with negative fair values to us are reported as liabilities. We classify each derivative as
either (i) a trading instrument (no specific hedging designation for financial reporting purposes) or (ii) a hedge of a forecasted
transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge).
F- 23
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Changes in the fair values of derivatives accounted for as trading instruments, including any associated interest income or
expense, are recorded in our consolidated statements of income (loss) through Other income if they are used to manage risks
associated with our MSR investments, through Mortgage banking activities, net if they are used to manage risks associated with our
mortgage banking activities, or through Investment fair value changes, net if they are used to manage risks associated with our
investments. Valuation changes related to residential LPCs, IRLCs, and FSCs are included in Mortgage banking activities, net on our
consolidated statements of income (loss).
Changes in the fair values of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective, are recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of equity on our consolidated balance sheets. Interest income or expense, and
any ineffectiveness associated with these derivatives, are recorded as a component of net interest income in our consolidated
statements of income (loss). We measure the effective portion of cash flow hedges by comparing the change in fair value of the
expected future variable cash flows of the derivative hedging instruments with the change in fair value of the expected future variable
cash flows of the hedged item.
We will discontinue a designated cash flow hedge relationship if (i) we determine that the hedging derivative is no longer
expected to be effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the designated hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires or is sold,
terminated, or exercised; (iii) the derivative is de-designated as a cash flow hedge; or (iv) it is probable that a forecasted transaction
associated with the hedged item will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. To the extent we de-designate or
terminate a cash flow hedging relationship and the associated hedged item continues to exist, any unrealized gain or loss of the cash
flow hedge at the time of de-designation remains in accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized using the straight-line
method through interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item.
Swaps and Swaptions
Interest rate swaps are agreements in which (i) one counterparty exchanges a stream of fixed interest payments for another
counterparty’s stream of variable interest cash flows; or (ii) each counterparty exchanges variable interest cash flows that are
referenced to different indices. Interest rate swaptions are agreements that provide the owner the right but not the obligation to enter
into an underlying interest rate swap with a counterparty in the future. We enter into swap and swaptions primarily to reduce
significant changes in our income or equity caused by interest rate volatility. Certain of these interest rate agreements may be
designated as cash flow hedges.
Interest Rate Futures
Interest rate futures are futures contracts based on U.S. Treasury notes, U.S. dollar-denominated interest rate swaps, or U.S.
dollar-denominated interest rate indices.
TBA Agreements
TBA agreements are forward contracts to purchase mortgage-backed securities that will be issued by a U.S. government
sponsored enterprise in the future. We purchase or sell these derivatives to offset - to varying degrees - changes in the values of
mortgage products for which we have exposure to interest rate volatility.
Loan Purchase and Forward Sale Commitments
We use the term LPCs to refer to agreements with third-party residential loan originators to purchase residential loans at a future
date that qualify as a derivative under GAAP and we use the term FSCs to refer to agreements with third-parties to sell residential
loans at a future date that also qualify as derivatives under GAAP. LPCs and FSCs are recorded at their estimated fair values on our
consolidated balance sheets and changes in fair value are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income
(loss) in Mortgage banking activities, net.
F- 24
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Interest Rate Lock Commitments
IRLCs are agreements we have made with third-party borrowers for single-family rental loans that will be originated and held for
sale. IRLCs qualify as derivatives under GAAP and are recorded at their estimated fair values on our consolidated balance sheets.
Changes in fair value are recurring and are reported through our consolidated statements of income (loss) in Mortgage banking
activities, net.
See Note 11 for further discussion on derivative financial instruments.
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Our deferred tax assets/liabilities are generated by temporary differences in GAAP and taxable income at our taxable REIT
subsidiaries. These differences generally reflect differing accounting treatments for GAAP and tax, such as accounting for mortgage
servicing rights, security discount and premium amortization, credit losses, asset impairments, and certain valuation estimates. As a
result of these differences, we may recognize taxable income in periods prior to when we recognize income for GAAP. When this
occurs, we pay the tax liability as required and establish a deferred tax asset. As the income is subsequently realized in future periods
under GAAP, the deferred tax asset is reduced. We may also recognize GAAP income in periods prior to when we recognize income
for tax. When this occurs, we establish a deferred tax liability for GAAP. As the income is subsequently realized in future periods for
tax, the deferred tax liability is reduced.
We may also record deferred tax assets/liabilities resulting from GAAP and tax basis differences of assets and liabilities acquired
in a business combination at our taxable REIT subsidiaries. These deferred tax assets/liabilities generally do not affect our GAAP
income at the time of establishment as the offsetting accounting entry is recorded in GAAP goodwill. They also do not generally affect
GAAP income when they are subsequently realized as the deferred tax provision or benefit resulting from the realization is offset by a
corresponding current tax benefit or provision.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider historical and projected
future taxable income and capital gains as well as tax planning strategies in making this assessment. We determine the extent to which
realization of this deferred asset is not assured and establish a valuation allowance accordingly. The estimate of net deferred tax assets
could change in future periods to the extent that actual or revised estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward periods
change from current expectations.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other assets primarily consists of accrued interest receivable, investment receivable, deferred tax asset, REO, operating lease
right-of-use assets, margin receivable, and fixed assets and leasehold improvements. Other liabilities primarily consists of accrued
compensation, margin payable, accrued interest payable, payable to non-controlling interests, guarantee obligations, operating lease
liabilities, deferred tax liabilities, and residential loan and MSR repurchase reserves. See Note 12 for further discussion.
Accrued Interest Receivable
Accrued interest receivable includes interest that is due and payable to us and deemed collectible. Cash interest is generally
received within thirty days of recording the receivable. For financial assets where we have elected the fair value option, the associated
accrued interest receivable on these assets is measured at fair value. For financial assets where we have not elected the fair value
option, the associated accrued interest carrying values approximate fair values.
Investment Receivable
Investment receivable primarily consists of amounts receivable from third-party servicers related to principal and interest
receivable from business purpose loans and fees receivable from servicer advance investments.
F- 25
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Margin Receivable and Payable
Margin receivable and payable result from margin calls between us and our derivatives, master repurchase agreements, and
warehouse facilities counterparties, whereby we or the counterparty were required to post collateral.
Agency Risk-Sharing - Other Assets and Liabilities
During 2014 and 2015, we entered into various risk-sharing arrangements with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Under these
arrangements, we committed to assume the first 1.00% or 2.25% (depending on the arrangement) of losses realized on reference pools
of conforming residential mortgage loans that we acquired and then sold to the Agencies. As part of these risk-sharing arrangements,
during the 10-year term of our first Fannie Mae arrangement, we receive monthly cash payments from Fannie Mae based on the
monthly outstanding unpaid principal balance of the reference pool of loans, and for our Freddie Mac and our subsequent Fannie Mae
arrangements, the Agencies charged us a reduced guarantee fee for the reference loans we delivered to them in exchange for
mortgage-backed securities, which we then sold.
Under these arrangements we are required to pledge assets to the Agencies to collateralize our risk-sharing commitments to them
throughout the terms of the arrangements. These pledged assets are held by a third-party custodian for the benefit of the Agencies. To
the extent approved losses are incurred, the custodian will transfer collateral to the Agencies. As a result of these transactions, we
recorded restricted cash, “pledged collateral” in the other assets line item, and “guarantee obligations” in the other liabilities line item,
on our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, for the first Fannie Mae transaction, we recorded a “guarantee asset” in the other
assets line item on our consolidated balance sheets.
The guarantee obligations represent our commitments to assume losses under these arrangements. We amortize the guarantee
obligations over the 10-year terms of the arrangements based primarily on changes in the outstanding unpaid principal balance of
loans in the reference pools, with a portion of the liabilities treated as a credit reserve that is not amortized into income. In addition,
each period we assess the need for a separate loss allowance related to these arrangements, based on our estimate of credit losses
inherent in the reference pools of loans.
Income from cash payments received under the first Fannie Mae risk-sharing arrangement and income related to the amortization
of the guarantee obligations of all three arrangements are recorded in Other income, and market valuation changes of the guarantee
asset are recorded in Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Our consolidated balance sheets include assets of the special purpose entities ("SPEs") associated with these risk-sharing
arrangements (i.e., the "pledged collateral" referred to above) that can only be used to settle obligations of these SPEs and liabilities of
these SPEs for which the creditors of these SPEs (the Agencies) do not have recourse to Redwood Trust, Inc. or its affiliates. At
December 31, 2021 and 2020, assets of such SPEs totaled $34 million and $46 million, respectively, and liabilities of such SPEs
totaled $7 million and $10 million, respectively.
See Note 16 for further discussion on loss contingencies — risk-sharing.
REO
REO property acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value, and subsequently reported at the lower
of its carrying amount or fair value (less estimated cost to sell). Changes in the fair value of an REO property that has a fair value at or
below its carrying amount are recorded in Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Accrued Interest Payable
Accrued interest payable includes interest that is due and payable to third parties. Interest is generally paid within one to three
months of recording the payable, based upon our remittance requirements, and is paid semi-annually for our convertible and
exchangeable debt. For borrowings where we have elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest on these liabilities is
measured at fair value. For financial liabilities where we have not elected the fair value option, the associated accrued interest carrying
values approximate fair values.
F- 26
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Lease - Asset and Liabilities
Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, "Leases," in 2019, we recorded operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets
on our consolidated balance sheets. The operating lease liabilities are equal to the present value of our remaining lease payments
discounted at our incremental borrowing rate and the operating lease right-of-use assets are equal to the operating lease liabilities
adjusted for our deferred rent liabilities at the adoption of this accounting standard. As lease payments are made, the operating lease
liabilities are reduced to the present value of the remaining lease payments and the operating lease right-of-use assets are reduced by
the difference between the lease expense (straight-lined over the lease term) and the theoretical interest expense amount (calculated
using the incremental borrowing rate). See Note 16 for further discussion on leases.
Payable to Non-Controlling Interests
Payable to non-controlling interests includes amounts payable to third parties, representing their interest in our consolidated
Servicing Investment and Point HEI entities.
See Note 10 and Note 12 for further discussion of other investments and Note 12 for further discussion on other assets and other
liabilities.
Short-Term Debt
Short-term debt includes borrowings under master repurchase agreements, loan warehouse facilities, and other forms of
borrowings that expire within one year with various counterparties. These borrowings are typically collateralized by cash, loans, or
securities, and in some cases may be unsecured. If the value (as determined by the applicable counterparty) of the collateral securing
those borrowings decreases, we may be subject to margin calls during the period the borrowings are outstanding. In instances where
we do not satisfy the margin calls within the required time frame, the counterparty may retain the collateral and pursue any
outstanding debt amount from us. Short-term debt also includes non-recourse short-term borrowings used to finance servicer advance
investments.
See Note 13 for further discussion on short-term debt.
Asset-Backed Securities Issued
ABS issued represents asset-backed securities issued through the Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia, Freddie Mac K-Series, Freddie Mac
SLST, CAFL, and Point HEI securitization entities. Assets at these entities are held in the custody of securitization trustees and are not
owned by Redwood. These trustees collect principal and interest payments (less servicing and related fees) from the assets and make
corresponding principal and interest payments to the ABS investors. In accordance with accounting guidance for CFEs, we account for
the ABS issued under certain of our consolidated entities at fair value, with periodic changes in fair value recorded in Investment fair
value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
During the third quarter of 2021, we consolidated the assets and liabilities of a securitization entity formed in connection with the
securitization of CoreVest bridge loans. During the third quarter of 2020, we re-securitized subordinate securities we owned in our
consolidated Freddie Mac SLST securitization trusts, through the transfer of these financial assets to a re-securitization trust that we
sponsored. We account for the ABS issued by the CAFL bridge securitization trust and the re-securitization trust at amortized cost.
See Note 14 for further discussion on ABS issued.
Long-Term Debt
FHLBC Borrowings
FHLBC borrowings included amounts borrowed by our FHLB-member subsidiary, also referred to as “advances,” from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago that were secured by eligible collateral, including, but not limited to, residential mortgage loans,
single-family rental loans, and residential mortgage-backed securities. FHLBC borrowings were carried at their unpaid principal
balance and interest on advances was paid every 13 weeks from when each respective advance was made. We paid off our remaining
FHLBC borrowings in 2021 after having substantially paid off our FHLBC borrowings in 2020.
F- 27
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Recourse Subordinate Securities Financing Facilities
Borrowings under our recourse subordinate securities financing facilities are secured by real estate securities and carried at unpaid
principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs. Interest on these facilities is paid monthly.
See Note 15 for further discussion on our subordinate securities financing facilities.
Non-Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
Borrowings under our non-recourse business purpose loan financing facilities are secured by bridge loans and other Business
Purpose Mortgage Lending ("BPL") investments and carried at unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance
costs. Interest on these facilities is paid monthly.
See Note 15 for further discussion on our non-recourse business purpose loan financing facilities.
Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
Borrowings under our recourse business purpose loan financing facilities are secured by bridge loans and single-family rental
loans and carried at unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs. Interest on these facilities is paid
monthly.
See Note 15 for further discussion on our recourse business purpose loan financing facilities.
Convertible Notes
Convertible notes include unsecured convertible and exchangeable debt that are carried at their unpaid principal balance net of
any unamortized deferred issuance costs. Interest on the notes is payable semiannually until such time the notes mature or are
converted or exchanged into shares. If converted or exchanged by a holder, the holder of the notes would receive shares of our
common stock.
Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Notes
Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes are carried at their unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred
issuance costs. This long-term debt is unsecured and interest is paid quarterly until it is redeemed in whole or matures at a future date.
Equity
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net unrealized gains and losses on real estate securities available-for-sale and interest rate agreements designated as cash flow
hedges are reported as components of Accumulated other comprehensive income on our consolidated statements of changes in
stockholders' equity and our consolidated balance sheets. Net unrealized gains and losses on securities and interest rate agreements
held by our taxable REIT subsidiaries that are reported in other comprehensive income are adjusted for the effects of taxation and may
create deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted
average common shares outstanding. Net income allocated to common shareholders represents net income less income allocated to
participating securities (as described herein). Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income allocated to common shareholders by the
weighted average common shares outstanding plus amounts representing the dilutive effect of share-based payment awards. In
addition, if the assumed conversion or exchange of convertible or exchangeable debt into common shares is dilutive, diluted EPS is
adjusted by adding back the periodic interest expense (net of any tax effects) associated with dilutive convertible or exchangeable debt
to net income and adding the shares issued in an assumed conversion or exchange to the diluted weighted average share count.
F- 28
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula under which EPS is calculated for common stock and participating
securities according to dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings
(distributed and undistributed) are allocated between participating securities and common shares based on their respective rights to
receive dividends or dividend equivalents. GAAP defines vested and unvested share-based payment awards containing nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents as participating securities that are included in computing EPS under the two-class method.
See Note 17 for further discussion on equity.
Incentive Plans
In May 2020, our shareholders approved an amendment to the 2014 Redwood Trust, Inc. Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”) for
executive officers, employees, and non-employee directors, which increased the number of shares available under the Incentive Plan.
The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of restricted stock, deferred stock, deferred stock units, performance-based awards (including
performance stock units), dividend equivalents, stock payments, restricted stock units, and other types of awards to eligible
participants. Long-term incentive awards granted under the Incentive Plan generally vest over a three- or four-year period. Awards
made under the Incentive Plan to officers and other employees in lieu of the payment in cash of a portion of annual bonuses earned
generally vest immediately, but are subject to a three-year mandatory holding period. Deferred stock units, restricted stock units, and
restricted stock awards have attached dividend equivalent rights, resulting in the payment of dividend equivalents each time we pay a
common stock dividend. Non-employee directors are also provided annual awards under the Incentive Plan that generally vest
immediately. The cost of the awards is generally amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Upon adoption of ASU
2016-09 in 2016, we elected to begin accounting for forfeitures on employee equity awards as they occur.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 2013, our shareholders approved an amendment to our previously amended 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) to increase the number of shares available under the ESPP. The purpose of the ESPP is to give our employees
an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the Company through the purchase of shares of common stock at a discount. The ESPP
allows eligible employees to purchase common stock at 85% of its fair value, subject to certain limits. Fair value as defined under the
ESPP is the lesser of the closing market price of the common stock on the first day of the calendar year or the last day of the calendar
quarter.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
In 2018, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our 2002 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) to
increase the number of shares available to non-employee directors to defer certain cash payments and dividends into DSUs. The EDCP
allows eligible employees and directors to defer portions of current salary and certain other forms of compensation. The Company
matches some deferrals. Compensation deferred under the EDCP is recorded as a liability on our consolidated balance sheets. The
EDCP allows for the investment of deferrals in either an interest crediting account or DSUs.
401(k) Plan
We offer a tax-qualified 401(k) Plan to all employees for retirement savings. Under this Plan, employees are allowed to defer and
invest up to 100% of their cash earnings, subject to the maximum 401(k) Plan contribution limit set forth by the Internal Revenue
Service. We match some employee contributions to encourage participation and to provide a retirement planning benefit to employees.
Plan matching contributions made by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 were $1.2 million, $1.1
million, and $0.7 million, respectively. Vesting of the 401(k) Plan matching contributions is based on the employee’s tenure at the
Company, and over time an employee becomes increasingly vested in matching contributions.
See Note 18 for further discussion on equity compensation plans.
F- 29
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding provisions of state law. To qualify
as a REIT we must distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to shareholders (not including taxable income retained
in our taxable REIT subsidiaries) within the time frame set forth in the Internal Revenue Code and also meet certain other
requirements related to assets, income, and stock ownership. We assess our tax positions for all open tax years and record tax benefits
only if tax positions meet a more-likely-than-not threshold in accordance with GAAP guidance on accounting for uncertain tax
positions. We classify interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions as interest expense and general and administrative
expenses, respectively, in our consolidated statements of income (loss).
See Note 22 for further discussion on taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-06, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Financial Services—
Depository and Lending (Topic 942), and Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs
Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses,
and No. 33-10835, Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank and Savings and Loan Registrants (SEC Update)." This new guidance
aligns certain SEC paragraphs in the codification with new SEC rules issued in May 2020 related to changes to the disclosure
requirements for acquired and disposed businesses. We adopted this guidance upon issuance in the third quarter of 2021, which did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes."
This new guidance simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740
and by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.
We adopted this guidance, as required, during the first quarter of 2021, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, "Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and
Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)." This new guidance clarifies the interaction of the accounting
for equity securities, equity method investments, and certain forward contracts and purchased options. This new guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We adopted this guidance, as required, during the first quarter of 2021, which did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-10, "Codification Improvements." This new guidance updates various codification
topics by clarifying or improving disclosure requirements. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2020. We adopted this guidance, as required, during the first quarter of 2021, which did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-09, "Debt (Topic 470): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release
No. 33-10762." This new guidance aligns certain SEC paragraphs in the codification with new SEC rules issued in March 2020 related
to changes to the disclosure requirements for registered debt securities. This new guidance was effective January 4, 2021. Early
adoption is permitted. We adopted this guidance, as required, during the first quarter of 2021, which did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-08, "Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables - Nonrefundable
Fees and Other Costs." This new guidance clarifies that an entity should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope
of paragraph 310-20-35-33 for each reporting period. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020.
We adopted this guidance, as required, during the first quarter of 2021, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
F- 30
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and
Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)." This new guidance simplifies the accounting for
convertible debt by reducing the number of accounting models to separately present certain conversion features in equity. This new
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to adopt this new
guidance by the required date and do not anticipate that this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference
Rate Reform on Financial Reporting." This new guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to
contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. In January 2021,
the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope." This new guidance clarifies that certain optional
expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the
discounting transition. This new guidance is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. As of
December 31, 2021, we were continuing to evaluate the impact of the discontinuation of LIBOR on our operations and our
consolidated financial statements, and we had not elected to apply the optional expedients and exceptions to any of our existing
contracts, hedging relationships, or other transactions.
We have an established cross-functional group that has evaluated our exposure to LIBOR, reviewed relevant contracts and has
monitored regulatory updates to assess the potential impact to our business, processes and technology from the ultimate full cessation
of LIBOR in 2023 and has established a LIBOR transition plan to facilitate an orderly transition to alternative reference rates. We
continue to remain on track with our LIBOR transition plan, which requires different solutions depending on the underlying asset or
liability with LIBOR exposure. As of December 31, 2021, our primary LIBOR exposure included the following: $2.47 billion of repo
or warehouse debt, $2.10 billion of interest rate swaps and swaptions, $708 million of bridge loans, and $140 million of trust preferred
securities and subordinated notes debt. Certain of our contracts, such as interest rate swaps, have experienced an orderly market
transition and subsequent to December 31, 2021, we have transitioned a substantial portion of our derivative positions off of LIBOR-
benchmarks. Other of our contracts, such as warehouse debt agreements, require bilateral amendments, which we are currently in the
process of executing and we anticipate most of these facilities will be amended in the first half of 2022, with sufficient time remaining
to resolve the remainder. In early 2022, we began benchmarking all newly originated bridge loans to the Secured Overnight Financing
Rate (“SOFR”), and our existing portfolio of bridge loans are short-dated and we expect the vast majority to mature before the LIBOR
cessation date in 2023. Additionally, as the result of recent legislation that was passed in the state of New York, our trust preferred
securities and subordinated notes are expected to convert to SOFR upon the cessation of LIBOR.
F- 31
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Balance Sheet Netting
Certain of our derivatives and short-term debt are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. Under GAAP, in
certain circumstances we may elect to present certain financial assets, liabilities and related collateral subject to master netting
arrangements in a net position on our consolidated balance sheets. However, we do not report any of these financial assets or liabilities
on a net basis, and instead present them on a gross basis on our consolidated balance sheets.
The table below presents financial assets and liabilities that are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements
categorized by financial instrument, together with corresponding financial instruments and corresponding collateral received or
pledged at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 3.1 – Offsetting of Financial Assets, Liabilities, and Collateral
Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Assets
(Liabilities)
Gross
Amounts
Offset in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Net Amounts
of Assets
(Liabilities)
Presented in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Gross Amounts Not Offset in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet (1)
Financial
Instruments
Cash
Collateral
(Received)
Pledged
Net Amount
$
$
$
$
18,929 $
2,880
25
21,834 $
— $
—
—
— $
18,929 $
2,880
25
21,834 $
(1,251) $
(633)
(25)
(1,909) $
(16,046) $
(704)
—
(16,750) $
1,632
1,543
—
3,175
(1,251) $
(658)
(905)
(572,720)
(575,534) $
— $
—
—
—
— $
(1,251) $
(658)
(905)
(572,720)
(575,534) $
1,251 $
633
25
572,720
574,629 $
— $
15
880
—
895 $
—
(10)
—
—
(10)
December 31, 2021 (In Thousands)
Assets (2)
Interest rate agreements
TBAs
Interest rate futures
Total Assets
Liabilities (2)
Interest rate agreements
TBAs
Futures
Loan warehouse debt
Total Liabilities
F- 32
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (continued)
Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Assets
(Liabilities)
Gross
Amounts
Offset in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Net Amounts
of Assets
(Liabilities)
Presented in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Gross Amounts Not Offset in
Consolidated
Balance Sheet (1)
Financial
Instruments
Cash
Collateral
(Received)
Pledged
Net Amount
$
$
$
$
19,951 $
18,260
38,211 $
— $
—
— $
19,951 $
18,260
38,211 $
— $
(13,423)
(13,423) $
(7,769) $
(4,658)
(12,427) $
12,182
179
12,361
(15,495) $
(137,269)
(77,775)
(230,539) $
— $
—
—
— $
(15,495) $
(137,269)
(77,775)
(230,539) $
13,423 $
137,269
77,775
228,467 $
1,061 $
—
—
1,061 $
(1,011)
—
—
(1,011)
December 31, 2020 (In Thousands)
Assets (2)
Interest rate agreements
TBAs
Total Assets
Liabilities (2)
TBAs
Loan warehouse debt
Security repurchase agreements
Total Liabilities
(1) Amounts presented in these columns are limited in total to the net amount of assets or liabilities presented in the prior column by instrument. In
certain cases, there is excess cash collateral or financial assets we have pledged to a counterparty (which may, in certain circumstances, be a
clearinghouse) that exceed the financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Additionally, in certain cases,
counterparties may have pledged excess cash collateral to us that exceeds our corresponding financial assets. In each case, any of these excess
amounts are excluded from the table although they are separately reported in our consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities, respectively.
(2)
Interest rate agreements and TBAs are components of derivatives instruments on our consolidated balance sheets. Loan warehouse debt, which
is secured by certain residential and business purpose loans, and security repurchase agreements are components of Short-term debt and Long-
term debt on our consolidated balance sheets.
For each category of financial instrument set forth in the table above, the assets and liabilities resulting from individual
transactions within that category between us and a counterparty are subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement with
that counterparty that provides for individual transactions to be aggregated and treated as a single transaction. For certain categories of
these instruments, our transactions generally are cleared and settled through one or more clearinghouses that are substituted as our
counterparty. References herein to master netting arrangements or similar agreements include the arrangements and agreements
governing the clearing and settlement of these transactions through the clearinghouses. In the event of the termination and close-out of
any of those transactions, the corresponding master netting agreement or similar agreement provides for settlement on a net basis. Any
such settlement would include the proceeds of the liquidation of any corresponding collateral, subject to certain limitations on
termination, settlement, and liquidation of collateral that may apply in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of a party. Such
limitations should not inhibit the eventual practical realization of the principal benefits of those transactions or the corresponding
master netting arrangement or similar agreement and any corresponding collateral.
F- 33
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation
GAAP requires us to consider whether securitizations we sponsor and other transfers of financial assets should be treated as sales
or financings, as well as whether any VIEs that we hold variable interests in – for example, certain legal entities often used in
securitization and other structured finance transactions – should be included in our consolidated financial statements. The GAAP
principles we apply require us to reassess our requirement to consolidate VIEs each quarter and therefore our determination may
change based upon new facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. This could result in a material impact to our consolidated
financial statements during subsequent reporting periods.
Analysis of Consolidated VIEs
At December 31, 2021, we consolidated Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia, CAFL, Freddie Mac SLST, Freddie Mac K-Series, and Point
HEI securitization entities that we determined were VIEs and for which we determined we were the primary beneficiary. Each of these
entities is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and liabilities of these entities are not owned by and are not legal
obligations of ours. Our exposure to these entities is primarily through the financial interests we have retained, although for certain
securitizations, we are exposed to financial risks associated with our role as a sponsor, servicing administrator, collateral
administrator, or depositor of these entities or as a result of our having sold assets directly or indirectly to these entities.
We also consolidate two Servicing Investment entities formed to invest in servicing-related assets that we determined were VIEs
and for which we determined we were the primary beneficiary. At December 31, 2021, we held an 80% ownership interest in, and
were responsible for the management of, each entity. See Note 10 for a further description of these entities and the investments they
hold and Note 12 for additional information on the minority partner’s non-controlling interest. Additionally, we consolidated an entity
that was formed to finance servicer advances that we determined was a VIE and for which we, through our control of one of the
aforementioned partnerships, were the primary beneficiary. The servicer advance financing consists of non-recourse short-term
securitization debt, secured by servicer advances. We consolidate the securitization entity, but the securitization entity is independent
of Redwood and the assets and liabilities are not owned by and are not legal obligations of Redwood. See Note 13 for additional
information on the servicer advance financing. At December 31, 2021, the estimated fair value of our investment in the Servicing
Investment entities was $103 million.
During 2021, we consolidated a Point HEI securitization entity formed to invest in Point HEIs that we determined was a VIE and
for which we determined we were the primary beneficiary. At December 31, 2021, we owned a portion of the subordinate certificates
issued by the entity and had certain decision making rights for the entity. See Note 10 for a further description of this entity and the
investments it holds and Note 12 for additional information on non-controlling interests in the entity. We consolidate the Point HEI
securitization entity, but the securitization entity is independent of Redwood and the assets and liabilities are not owned by and are not
legal obligations of Redwood.
During 2021, we called two of our consolidated CAFL entities and repaid the associated ABS issued. In association with these
calls, we transferred $91 million (unpaid principal balance) of loans from held-for-investment to held-for-sale.
During 2020, we re-securitized subordinate securities we owned in our consolidated Freddie Mac SLST securitization trusts
through the transfer of these financial assets to a re-securitization trust that we sponsored. We retain a subordinate investment in the
re-securitization trust and maintain certain discretionary rights associated with the ownership of this investment that we determined
reflected a controlling financial interest in the entity, as we have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact
the performance of the VIE and the right to receive benefits of and the obligation to absorb losses from the VIE that could potentially
be significant to the VIE.
During 2020, we sold subordinate securities (and transferred directing certificate holder status as a result of these sales) issued by
four of these Freddie Mac K-Series securitization trusts and determined that we should derecognize the associated assets and liabilities
of each of these entities for financial reporting purposes. We deconsolidated $3.86 billion of multifamily loans and other assets and
$3.72 billion of multifamily ABS issued and other liabilities, for which we realized market valuation losses of $72 million, which were
recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 34
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
For certain of our consolidated VIEs, we have elected to account for the assets and liabilities of these entities as collateralized
financing entities ("CFE"). A CFE is a variable interest entity that holds financial assets and issues beneficial interests in those assets,
and these beneficial interests have contractual recourse only to the related assets of the CFE. Accounting guidance for CFEs allows
companies to elect to measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE using the more observable of the fair value of
the financial assets or fair value of the financial liabilities. The net equity in an entity accounted for under the CFE election effectively
represents the fair value of the beneficial interests we own in the entity.
In addition to our consolidated VIEs for which we made the CFE election, we consolidate certain VIEs for which we did not make
the CFE election, and elected to account for the ABS issued by these entities at amortized cost. These include our CAFL Bridge
securitization, Freddie Mac SLST re-securitization, and Servicing Investment entities.
The following table presents a summary of the assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs.
Table 4.1 – Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Residential loans, held-for-
investment
Business purpose loans, held-for-
investment
Multifamily loans, held-for-
investment
Other investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accrued interest receivable
Other assets
Total Assets
Short-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
Asset-backed securities issued
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
CAFL(1)
Freddie
Mac
SLST(1)
Freddie
Mac
K-Series
Servicing
Investment
Point HEI
Total
Consolidated
VIEs
$ 230,455 $ 3,628,465 $
— $ 1,888,230 $
— $
— $
— $ 5,747,150
—
—
—
—
148
210
61
—
3,766,316
—
—
—
5
10,885
—
—
—
—
15,221
15,737
32,510
—
—
—
—
—
5,792
2,028
—
473,514
—
—
—
1,315
—
—
—
—
—
384,754
159,553
6,481
25,420
1,462
7,177
—
5,292
—
50
3,766,316
473,514
544,307
6,481
46,086
35,401
41,826
$ 230,874 $ 3,639,355 $ 3,829,784 $ 1,896,050 $ 474,829 $ 425,294 $ 164,895 $ 10,661,081
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $ 294,447 $
— $
294,447
99
8,452
11,030
4,055
1,190
192
—
25,018
—
227,881
5
3,383,048
1,171
3,474,898
—
1,588,463
—
441,857
28,115
—
17,034
137,410
46,325
9,253,557
Total Liabilities
$ 227,980 $ 3,391,505 $ 3,487,099 $ 1,592,518 $ 443,047 $ 322,754 $ 154,444 $ 9,619,347
Value of our investments in VIEs(1)
2,634
245,417
339,419
301,795
31,657
102,540
10,451
1,033,913
Number of VIEs
20
16
16
3
1
3
1
60
F- 35
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Residential loans, held-for-
investment
Business purpose loans, held-for-
investment
Multifamily loans, held-for-
investment
Other investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accrued interest receivable
Other assets
Total Assets
Short-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
Choice
CAFL
Freddie Mac
SLST(1)
Freddie Mac
K-Series
Servicing
Investment
Total
Consolidated
VIEs
$
285,935 $ 1,565,322 $
— $ 2,221,153 $
— $
— $ 4,072,410
—
—
—
—
148
305
638
—
3,249,194
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
13,055
2,930
6,754
646
—
—
—
—
6,802
—
—
492,221
—
—
—
1,337
—
—
251,773
11,579
23,220
2,334
3,249,194
492,221
251,773
11,579
23,368
30,587
—
493,558 $
5,723
9,937
294,629 $ 8,141,069
287,026 $ 1,572,124 $ 3,265,179 $ 2,228,553 $
$
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
208,375 $
208,375
141
—
4,697
10,278
4,846
1,177
135
21,274
50
—
—
—
18,353
18,403
Asset-backed securities issued
282,326
1,347,357
3,013,093
1,993,919
463,966
—
7,100,661
Total Liabilities
$
282,467 $ 1,352,104 $ 3,023,371 $ 1,998,765 $
465,143 $
226,863 $ 7,348,713
Value of our investments in VIEs(1)
Number of VIEs
4,559
220,020
238,680
229,788
28,415
67,766
789,228
20
10
14
2
1
3
50
(1) Value of our investments in VIEs, as presented in this table, represent the fair value of our economic interests in the VIEs only for consolidated
VIEs we account for under the CFE election. CAFL includes SFR loan securitizations we account for under the CFE election and a bridge loan
securitization for which we did not make the CFE election. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the fair value of our interests in the CAFL SFR
securitizations were $302 million and $239 million, respectively, and our net carrying value in the CAFL Bridge securitization was $38 million
and zero, respectively. Freddie Mac SLST includes securitizations we account for under the CFE election and also includes ABS issued in
relation to a resecuritization of the securities we own in the consolidated Freddie Mac SLST VIEs, that we account for at amortized historical
cost. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the fair value of our interests in the Freddie Mac SLST securitizations accounted for under the CFE
election were $445 million and $428 million, respectively, and the carrying value of the ABS issued and carried at amortized historical cost was
$143 million and $200 million respectively.
F- 36
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
The following tables present income (loss) from these VIEs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 4.2 – Income (Loss) from Consolidated VIEs
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income
Total non-interest income, net
General and administrative expenses
Other expenses
Income (Loss) from Consolidated
VIEs
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
CAFL
Freddie
Mac
SLST
Freddie
Mac
K-Series
Servicing
Investment
Point HEI
Total
Consolidated
VIEs
$
4,709 $
74,025 $ 207,202 $
76,287 $
19,266 $
18,803 $
— $
400,292
(3,040)
(59,949)
(160,618)
(64,635)
(17,686)
1,669
14,076
46,584
11,652
1,580
(1,558)
—
(1,558)
—
—
14,176
—
14,176
—
—
8,521
72
8,593
—
—
62,374
—
62,374
—
—
11,599
—
11,599
—
—
(4,867)
13,936
(5,209)
—
(5,209)
(283)
(1,689)
—
—
218
—
218
—
—
(310,795)
89,497
90,121
72
90,193
(283)
(1,689)
$
111 $
28,252 $
55,177 $
74,026 $
13,179 $
6,755 $
218 $
177,718
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
CAFL
Freddie Mac
SLST
Freddie Mac
K-Series
Servicing
Investment
Total
Consolidated
VIEs
$
9,061 $
(5,945)
3,116
87,093 $
(73,643)
13,450
136,950 $
(105,732)
31,218
85,609 $
(66,859)
18,750
54,813 $
(51,521)
3,292
17,665 $
(6,441)
11,224
391,191
(310,141)
81,050
Investment fair value changes, net
Total non-interest income, net
General and administrative expenses
Other expenses
(1,512)
(1,512)
—
—
(13,244)
(13,244)
—
—
(39,574)
(39,574)
—
—
(21,160)
(21,160)
—
—
(81,039)
(81,039)
—
—
(11,327)
(11,327)
(867)
193
(167,856)
(167,856)
(867)
193
Income from Consolidated VIEs
$
1,604 $
206 $
(8,356) $
(2,410) $
(77,747) $
(777) $
(87,480)
We consolidate the assets and liabilities of certain Sequoia, CAFL and Point HEI securitization entities, as we did not meet the
GAAP sale criteria at the time we transferred financial assets to these entities. Our involvement in consolidated Sequoia, CAFL and
Point HEI entities continues in the following ways: (i) we continue to hold subordinate investments in each entity, and for certain
entities, more senior investments; (ii) we maintain certain discretionary rights associated with our sponsorship of, or our subordinate
investments in, each entity including rights to direct loss mitigation activities; and (iii) we continue to hold a right to call the assets of
certain entities (once they have been paid down below a specified threshold) at a price equal to, or in excess of, the current outstanding
principal amount of the entity’s asset-backed securities issued. These factors have resulted in our continuing to consolidate the assets
and liabilities of these Sequoia, CAFL and Point HEI entities in accordance with GAAP.
We consolidate the assets and liabilities of certain Freddie Mac K-Series and SLST securitization trusts resulting from our
investment in subordinate securities issued by these trusts, and in the case of certain CAFL securitizations, resulting from securities
acquired through our acquisition of CoreVest. Additionally, we consolidate the assets and liabilities of Servicing Investment entities
from our investment in servicer advance investments and excess MSRs. In each case, we maintain certain discretionary rights
associated with the ownership of these investments that we determined reflected a controlling financial interest, as we have both the
power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs and the right to receive benefits of
and the obligation to absorb losses from the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs.
F- 37
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
Analysis of Unconsolidated VIEs with Continuing Involvement
Since 2012, we have transferred residential loans to 49 Sequoia securitization entities sponsored by us that are still outstanding as
of December 31, 2021 and accounted for these transfers as sales for financial reporting purposes, in accordance with ASC 860. We
also determined we were not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as we lacked the power to direct the activities that will have the
most significant economic impact on the entities. For certain of these transfers to securitization entities, for the transferred loans where
we held the servicing rights prior to the transfer and continued to hold the servicing rights following the transfer, we recorded MSRs
on our consolidated balance sheets, and classified those MSRs as Level 3 assets. We also retained senior and subordinate securities in
these securitizations that we classified as Level 3 assets. Our continuing involvement in these securitizations is limited to customary
servicing obligations associated with retaining servicing rights (which we retain a third-party sub-servicer to perform) and the receipt
of interest income associated with the securities we retained.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we called seven of our unconsolidated Sequoia entities, and purchased $200 million
(unpaid principal balance) of loans from the securitization trusts. In association with these calls, we realized $16 million of gains on
the securities we owned from these called securitizations, which was recognized through Realized gains, net on our consolidated
statements of income (loss). At December 31, 2021, we held $172 million of loans for sale at fair value that were acquired following
the calls.
Table 4.3 – Securitization Activity Related to Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
(In Thousands)
Principal balance of loans transferred
Trading securities retained, at fair value
AFS securities retained, at fair value
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
1,231,803 $
2,223,462
7,774
1,600
49,089
4,187
The following table summarizes the cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 between us and the
unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by us and accounted for as sales since 2012.
Table 4.4 – Cash Flows Related to Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
(In Thousands)
Proceeds from new transfers
MSR fees received
Funding of compensating interest, net
Cash flows received on retained securities
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
1,266,063 $
5,003
(160)
47,596
2,276,521
9,749
(405)
24,172
The following table presents the key weighted average assumptions used to value securities retained at the date of securitization
for securitizations completed during 2021 and 2020.
Table 4.5 – Assumptions Related to Assets Retained from Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
At Date of Securitization
Prepayment rates
Discount rates
Credit loss assumptions
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Subordinate
Securities
Senior IO
Securities
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Subordinate
Securities
Senior IO
Securities
11 %
6 %
0.23 %
29 %
14 %
0.27 %
14 %
7 %
0.24 %
11 %
15 %
0.23 %
F- 38
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
The following table presents additional information at December 31, 2021 and 2020, related to unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by
Redwood and accounted for as sales since 2012.
Table 4.6 – Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
(In Thousands)
On-balance sheet assets, at fair value:
Interest-only, senior and subordinate securities, classified as trading
Subordinate securities, classified as AFS
Mortgage servicing rights
Maximum loss exposure (1)
Assets transferred:
Principal balance of loans outstanding
Principal balance of loans 30+ days delinquent
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
$
$
$
18,214 $
127,542
6,450
152,206 $
20,982
136,475
8,413
165,870
4,959,234 $
30,594
7,728,432
138,029
(1) Maximum loss exposure from our involvement with unconsolidated VIEs pertains to the carrying value of our securities and MSRs retained
from these VIEs and represents estimated losses that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, such as if the value of our
interests and any associated collateral declines to zero. This does not include, for example, any potential exposure to representation and warranty
claims associated with our initial transfer of loans into a securitization.
The following table presents key economic assumptions for assets retained from unconsolidated VIEs and the sensitivity of their
fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 4.7 – Key Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis for Assets Retained from Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Fair value at December 31, 2021
Expected life (in years) (2)
Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR) (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
10% adverse change
25% adverse change
Discount rate assumption (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
100 basis point increase
200 basis point increase
Credit loss assumption (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
10% higher losses
25% higher losses
MSRs
$
6,450
Senior
Securities (1)
18,214
$
Subordinate
Securities
$
127,542
3
29 %
$
447
$
1,020
12 %
$
$
152
297
N/A
4
23 %
1,130
2,596
16 %
426
829
0.35 %
N/A $
N/A
—
—
$
$
$
5
32 %
531
1,440
5 %
4,801
9,139
0.35 %
1,528
3,819
F- 39
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 4. Principles of Consolidation - (continued)
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Fair value at December 31, 2020
Expected life (in years) (2)
Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR) (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
10% adverse change
25% adverse change
Discount rate assumption (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
100 basis point increase
200 basis point increase
Credit loss assumption (2)
Decrease in fair value from:
10% higher losses
25% higher losses
MSRs
$
8,413
Senior
Securities (1)
17,333
$
Subordinate
Securities
$
140,124
2
37 %
$
906
$
2,058
12 %
$
$
196
380
N/A
3
31 %
1,557
3,754
21 %
337
659
0.41 %
N/A $
N/A
—
—
8
33 %
452
2,298
5 %
9,769
18,650
0.41 %
2,409
5,915
$
$
$
(1) Senior securities included $18 million and $17 million of interest-only securities at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2) Expected life, prepayment speed assumption, discount rate assumption, and credit loss assumption presented in the tables above represent
weighted averages.
Analysis of Unconsolidated Third-Party VIEs
Third-party VIEs are securitization entities in which we maintain an economic interest, but do not sponsor. Our economic interest
may include several securities and other investments from the same third-party VIE, and in those cases, the analysis is performed in
consideration of all of our interests. The following table presents a summary of our interests in third-party VIEs at December 31, 2021
and 2020, grouped by asset type.
Table 4.8 – Third-Party Sponsored VIE Summary
(In Thousands)
Mortgage-Backed Securities
Senior
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities
Excess MSR
Total Investments in Third-Party Sponsored VIEs
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
3,572 $
—
228,083
231,655
10,400
242,055 $
11,131
2,014
173,523
186,668
14,133
200,801
We determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of these third-party VIEs, as we do not have the required power to direct
the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. Specifically, we do not service or manage
these entities or otherwise solely hold decision making powers that are significant. As a result of this assessment, we do not
consolidate any of the underlying assets and liabilities of these third-party VIEs – we only account for our specific interests in them.
Our assessments of whether we are required to consolidate a VIE may change in subsequent reporting periods based upon
changing facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. Any related accounting changes could result in a material impact to our
financial statements.
F- 40
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For financial reporting purposes, we follow a fair value hierarchy established under GAAP that is used to determine the fair value
of financial instruments. This hierarchy prioritizes relevant market inputs in order to determine an “exit price” at the measurement
date, or the price at which an asset could be sold or a liability could be transferred in an orderly process that is not a forced liquidation
or distressed sale. Level 1 inputs are observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices for an asset or liability that are obtained through corroboration with
observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs (e.g., our own data or assumptions) that are used when there is little, if
any, relevant market activity for the asset or liability required to be measured at fair value.
In certain cases, inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level at
which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Our assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability being
measured.
F- 41
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded
or disclosed at fair value at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 5.1 – Carrying Values and Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
(In Thousands)
Assets
Residential loans, held-for-sale at fair value
Residential loans, held-for-investment
Business purpose loans, held-for-sale
Business purpose loans, held-for-investment
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Servicer advance investments (1)
MSRs (1)
Excess MSRs (1)
HEIs (1)
Other investments (1)
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Derivative assets
REO (2)
Margin receivable (2)
FHLBC stock (2)
Pledged collateral (2)
Liabilities
Short-term debt
Margin payable (3)
Guarantee obligation (3)
Point HEI non-controlling interest
Derivative liabilities
ABS issued net
Fair value
Amortized cost
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
$ 1,845,248 $ 1,845,248 $
176,604 $
5,747,150
358,309
4,432,680
473,514
377,411
350,923
12,438
44,231
192,740
12,663
450,485
80,999
26,467
36,126
7,269
10
—
5,747,150
358,309
4,432,680
473,514
377,411
350,923
12,438
44,231
192,740
12,663
450,485
80,999
26,467
39,272
7,269
10
—
4,072,410
245,394
3,890,959
492,221
344,125
231,489
8,815
34,418
42,440
18,847
461,260
83,190
53,238
8,413
4,758
5,000
1,177
176,604
4,072,410
245,394
3,890,959
492,221
344,125
231,489
8,815
34,418
42,440
18,847
461,260
83,190
53,238
9,229
4,758
5,000
1,177
$ 2,177,362 $ 2,177,362 $
24,368
7,459
17,035
3,317
8,843,147
410,410
988,483
513,629
138,721
24,368
7,133
17,035
3,317
8,843,147
410,471
989,570
537,300
97,650
522,609 $
—
10,039
—
16,072
522,609
—
7,843
—
16,072
6,900,362
200,299
774,726
511,085
138,674
6,900,362
204,892
783,570
499,865
80,910
Other long-term debt, net (4)
Convertible notes, net (4)
Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes, net (4)
(1) These investments are included in Other investments on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2) These assets are included in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
(3) These liabilities are included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
(4) The liabilities are included in Long-Term debt, net of our consolidated balance sheets.
F- 42
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we elected the fair value option for $59 million and $108 million of
securities, respectively, $12.92 billion and $4.37 billion of residential loans (principal balance), respectively, $2.22 billion and $1.40
billion of business purpose loans (principal balance), respectively, $197 million and $179 million of servicer advance investments,
respectively, $18 million and $11 million of excess MSRs, respectively, $15 million and $0.5 million of other financial instruments,
respectively. Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we elected the fair value option for $155 million and
$4 million of HEIs, respectively. We anticipate electing the fair value option for all future purchases of residential and business
purpose loans that we intend to sell to third parties or transfer to securitizations, as well as for certain securities we purchase, including
IO securities and fixed-rate securities rated investment grade or higher.
The following table presents the assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets on a
recurring basis at December 31, 2021 and 2020, as well as the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs used to measure fair value.
Table 5.2 – Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Assets
Residential loans
Business purpose loans
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Servicer advance investments
MSRs
Excess MSRs
HEIs
Other investments
Derivative assets
FHLBC stock
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities
ABS issued
Carrying
Value
Fair Value Measurements Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 7,592,398 $
— $
— $ 7,592,398
4,790,989
473,514
377,411
350,923
12,438
44,231
192,740
17,574
26,467
10
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,906
—
18,928
10
4,790,989
473,514
377,411
350,923
12,438
44,231
192,740
17,574
4,633
—
$
3,317 $
8,843,147
1,563 $
—
1,251 $
—
503
8,843,147
F- 43
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Assets
Residential loans
Business purpose loans
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Servicer advance investments
MSRs
Excess MSRs
HEIs
Derivative assets
Pledged collateral
FHLBC stock
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities
ABS issued
Carrying
Value
Fair Value Measurements Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 4,249,014 $
— $
— $ 4,249,014
4,136,353
492,221
344,125
231,489
8,815
34,418
42,440
53,238
1,177
5,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,260
1,177
—
19,951
—
5,000
4,136,353
492,221
344,125
231,489
8,815
34,418
42,440
15,027
—
—
16,072
6,900,362
15,495
—
—
—
577
6,900,362
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 5.3 – Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets
Residential
Loans
Business
Purpose
Loans
Multifamily
Loans
Trading
Securities
AFS
Securities
Servicer
Advance
Investments
Excess
MSRs
HEIs
MSRs and
Other
Investments
$ 4,249,014 $ 4,136,353 $ 492,221 $ 125,667 $ 218,458 $ 231,489 $ 34,418 $ 42,440 $
27,662
13,139,907
136,685
—
2,150,539
(8,449,328)
(211,113)
—
—
—
—
—
(34,802)
(4,785)
—
—
58,917
19,100
196,583
17,830
155,023
15,215
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(19,395)
(14,751)
Principal paydowns
(1,360,649)
(1,307,566)
(7,639)
(2,713)
(57,953)
(76,223)
16,688
(77,357)
(11,068)
23,550
40,735
(926)
(8,017)
13,774
(2,846)
Other settlements, net (1)
(3,234)
(36,552)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(8,763)
—
—
—
—
—
—
898
—
(179)
Ending balance -
December 31, 2021
$ 7,592,398 $ 4,790,989 $ 473,514 $ 170,619 $ 206,792 $ 350,923 $ 44,231 $ 192,740 $
25,101
F- 44
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance -
December 31, 2020
Acquisitions
Originations
Sales
Gains (losses) in net
income (loss), net
Unrealized losses in
OCI, net
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Table 5.3 – Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis (continued)
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance - December 31, 2020
Acquisitions
Principal paydowns
Gains (losses) in net income (loss), net
Other settlements, net (1)
Ending balance - December 31, 2021
Liabilities
Point HEI Non-
Controlling
Interest
ABS
Issued
— $
6,900,362
16,639
—
396
—
4,202,070
(1,922,313)
(336,972)
—
Derivatives (2)
$
14,450
—
—
10,437
(20,757)
$
4,130 $
17,035 $
8,843,147
Assets
Residential
Loans
Business
Purpose
Loans
Multifamily
Loans
Trading
Securities
AFS
Securities
Servicer
Advance
Investments
Excess
MSRs
HEIs
MSRs and
Other
Investments
$ 7,714,745 $ 3,506,743 $ 4,408,524 $ 860,540 $ 239,334 $ 169,204 $ 31,814 $
45,085 $
67,313
4,483,473
—
—
1,431,251
(6,262,958)
(135,800)
—
—
—
—
—
(603,529)
(55,192)
—
—
108,249
57,652
179,419
10,906
3,517
(1,552,171)
(753,026)
(7,703)
(8,687)
(17,924)
(107,527)
—
—
(3,849,779)
—
—
—
—
—
450
—
—
(4,278)
(5,843)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(132,307)
99,590
(58,821)
(230,906)
10,792
(9,607)
(8,302)
(1,884)
(34,258)
—
—
(1,768)
(12,405)
—
—
—
—
(16,204)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 4,249,014 $ 4,136,353 $ 492,221 $ 125,667 $ 218,458 $ 231,489 $ 34,418 $
42,440 $
27,662
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance -
December 31, 2019
Acquisitions
Originations
Sales
Principal paydowns
Deconsolidations
Gains (losses) in net
income, net
Unrealized gains in
OCI, net
Other settlements, net (1)
Ending balance -
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance - December 31, 2019
Acquisitions
Principal paydowns
Deconsolidations
Gains (losses) in net income, net
Other settlements, net (1)
Ending balance - December 31, 2020
Liabilities
Contingent
Consideration
ABS
Issued
Derivatives (2)
$
8,860 $
—
—
—
56,972
(51,382)
14,450 $
—
(13,353)
—
(446)
(14,685)
28,484 $ 10,515,475
1,478,589
(1,487,958)
(3,706,789)
101,045
—
6,900,362
— $
$
(1) Other settlements, net for residential and business purpose loans represents the transfer of loans to REO, and for derivatives, the settlement of
forward sale commitments and the transfer of the fair value of loan purchase or interest rate lock commitments at the time loans are acquired to
the basis of residential and single-family rental loans. Other settlements, net for contingent consideration reflects the reclassification from a
contingent liability to a deferred liability during the period due to an amendment in the underlying agreement. See Note 16 for further
discussion. Other settlements, net for trading securities relates to the consolidation of Freddie Mac K-Series securitization entities.
(2) For the purpose of this presentation, derivative assets and liabilities, which consist of loan purchase commitments, forward sale commitments,
and interest rate lock commitments, are presented on a net basis.
F- 45
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
The following table presents the portion of gains or losses included in our consolidated statements of income (loss) that were
attributable to Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and held at December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Gains or losses incurred on assets or liabilities sold, matured, called, or fully written down during the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020, and 2019 are not included in this presentation.
Table 5.4 – Portion of Net Gains (Losses) Attributable to Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Still Held at December 31, 2021, 2020, and
2019 Included in Net Income
(In Thousands)
Assets
Included in Net Income
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
Residential loans at Redwood
$
5,886 $
Business purpose loans
Net investments in consolidated Sequoia entities (1)
Net investments in consolidated Freddie Mac SLST entities (1)
Net investments in consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series entities (1)
Net investments in consolidated CAFL SFR entities (1)
Net investments in consolidated Point HEI entity (1)
Trading securities
Available-for-sale securities
Servicer advance investments
MSRs
Excess MSRs
HEIs at Redwood
Loan purchase and interest rate lock commitments
Liabilities
Non-controlling interest in consolidated Point HEI entity
Loan purchase commitments
Contingent consideration
9,444
12,455
62,124
11,599
8,198
614
738
—
(926)
629
(8,017)
212
4,633
1,138 $
9,420
(14,646)
(21,220)
(9,309)
(37,062)
—
(83,327)
(388)
(8,902)
(17,545)
(8,302)
(1,884)
15,027
67,470
14,603
4,529
27,225
21,430
(14,681)
—
18,865
—
3,001
(11,957)
(3,260)
842
10,190
$
(396) $
(503) $
—
— $
(577) $
—
—
(1,290)
(3,217)
(1) Represents the portion of net gains or losses included in our consolidated statements of income (loss) related to loans and the associated ABS
issued at our consolidated securitization entities held at December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, which netted together represent the change in value
of our investments at the consolidated VIEs. The net gain attributable for the Point HEI entity excludes valuation change in the non-controlling
interest in consolidated Point HEI entity, which is separately shown in Table 5.4 above.
F- 46
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
The following table presents information on assets recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
This table does not include the carrying value and gains or losses associated with the asset types below that were not recorded at fair
value on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 5.5 – Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Assets
REO
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Assets
REO
Carrying
Value
Fair Value Measurements Using
Gain (Loss) for
Year Ended
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2021
$
588 $
— $
— $
588 $
(217)
Carrying
Value
Fair Value Measurements Using
Gain (Loss) for
Year Ended
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2020
$
1,117 $
— $
— $
1,117 $
(157)
The following table presents the net market valuation gains and losses recorded in each line item of our consolidated statements of
income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
F- 47
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Table 5.6 – Market Valuation Gains and Losses, Net
(In Thousands)
Mortgage Banking Activities, Net
Residential loans held-for-sale, at fair value
Residential loan purchase and forward sale commitments
Single-family rental loans held-for-sale, at fair value
Single-family rental loan purchase and interest rate lock commitments
Bridge loans
Trading securities (1)
Risk management derivatives, net
Total mortgage banking activities, net (2)
Investment Fair Value Changes, Net
Residential loans held-for-investment at Redwood
Single-family rental loans held-for-investment
Bridge loans held-for-investment
Trading securities
Servicer advance investments
Excess MSRs
Net investments in Legacy Sequoia entities (3)
Net investments in Sequoia entities (3)
Net investments in Freddie Mac SLST entities (3)
Net investments in Freddie Mac K-Series entities (3)
Net investments in CAFL entities (3)
Net investments in Point HEI entities (3)
HEIs at Redwood
Other investments
Risk management derivatives, net
Change in allowance for credit losses on AFS securities
Total investment fair value changes, net
Other Income
MSRs
Risk management derivatives, net
Gain on re-measurement of 5 Arches investment
Total other income (4)
Total Market Valuation (Losses) Gains, Net
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
73,332 $
(15,477) $
10,401
63,206
666
8,253
(352)
41,060
56,761
82,169
341
(4,998)
(4,535)
(47,779)
196,566 $
66,482 $
3,267
60,260
15,043
1,961
4,518
—
(15,723)
69,326
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,812 $
(93,314) $
58,891
—
(65)
23,935
(925)
(8,017)
(1,558)
14,176
62,374
11,599
10,271
218
13,207
(366)
—
388
(20,806)
(10,629)
(226,196)
(8,901)
(8,302)
(1,513)
(13,244)
(21,160)
(81,039)
(36,754)
—
(1,883)
(5,167)
272
(2,139)
56,046
3,001
(3,260)
(1,545)
6,947
27,206
21,430
(3,636)
—
—
(544)
(59,142)
(127,169)
(388)
—
128,049 $
(588,438) $
35,500
(3,182) $
(33,409) $
(18,856)
—
—
13,966
—
(3,182) $
(19,443) $
321,433 $
(541,399) $
8,595
2,441
(7,820)
97,006
(1) Represents fair value changes on trading securities that are being used along with risk management derivatives to manage the mark-to-market risks associated with
our residential mortgage banking operations.
(2) Mortgage banking activities, net presented above does not include fee income from loan originations or acquisitions, provisions for repurchases expense, and other
expenses that are components of Mortgage banking activities, net presented on our consolidated statements of income (loss), as these amounts do not represent
market valuation changes.
(3)
Includes changes in fair value of the residential loans held-for-investment, REO and the ABS issued at the entities, which netted together represent the change in
value of our investments at the consolidated VIEs.
(4) Other income presented above does not include net MSR fee income or provisions for repurchases for MSRs, as these amounts do not represent market valuation
adjustments.
F- 48
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Valuation Policy
We maintain policies that specify the methodologies we use to value different types of financial instruments. Significant changes
to the valuation methodologies are reviewed by members of senior management to confirm the changes are appropriate and
reasonable. Valuations based on information from external sources are performed on an instrument-by-instrument basis with the
resulting amounts analyzed individually against internal calculations as well as in the aggregate by product type classification. Initial
valuations are performed by our portfolio management groups using the valuation processes described below. Our finance department
then independently reviews all fair value estimates to ensure they are reasonable. Finally, members of senior management review all
fair value estimates, including an analysis of the methodology and valuation changes from prior reporting periods.
Valuation Process
We estimate fair values for financial assets or liabilities based on available inputs observed in the marketplace as well as
unobservable inputs. We primarily use two pricing valuation techniques: market comparable pricing and discounted cash flow
analysis. Market comparable pricing is used to determine the estimated fair value of certain instruments by incorporating known inputs
and performance metrics, such as observed prepayment rates, delinquencies, severities, credit support, recent transaction prices,
pending transactions, or prices of other similar instruments. Discounted cash flow analysis techniques generally consist of developing
an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of an instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate
of return that results in an estimate of fair value. After considering all available indications of the appropriate rate of return that market
participants would require, we consider the reasonableness of the range indicated by the results to determine an estimate that is most
representative of fair value. We also consider counterparty credit quality and risk as part of our fair value assessments.
F- 49
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
The following table provides quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of our Level
3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Table 5.7 – Fair Value Methodology for Level 3 Financial Instruments
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands, except
Input Values)
Assets
Residential loans, at fair value:
Fair
Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Input Values
Weighted
Average (1)
Jumbo fixed-rate loans
$ 1,200,322 Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Whole loan spread to TBA price
Whole loan spread to swap rate
Called loan dollar price
20 -
20 %
20 %
$ 2.56 - $ 2.56
$ 2.56
185 -
102 - $
185 bps
102
$
185 bps
102
$
644,926 Whole loan committed sales price
$ 101.91 - $ 102.58
$ 102.19
230,455 Liability price
3,628,465 Liability price
1,888,230 Liability price
N/A
N/A
N/A
Jumbo loans committed to sell
Loans held by Legacy Sequoia (2)
Loans held by Sequoia (2)
Loans held by Freddie Mac
SLST (2)
Business purpose loans:
Single-family rental loans
N/A
N/A
N/A
91 bps
362 bps
36 %
9 %
3 %
99
N/A
6 %
N/A
7 %
26 %
4 %
24 %
103
3 %
18 %
5 yrs
11 bps
13 %
24 %
95
17 %
22 %
11 bps
85 -
110 bps
125 - 1,517 bps
36 -
8 -
3 -
78 - $
36 %
14 %
3 %
103
N/A
4 -
15 %
$
N/A
47 %
50 %
27 %
50 %
112
$
4 %
30 %
5 yrs
18 bps
15 %
79 %
95
19 %
31 %
17 bps
$
2 -
7 -
— -
— -
96 - $
2 -
17 -
4 -
2 -
12 -
6 -
95 - $
13 -
19 -
9 -
$
$
$
358,309 Senior credit spread
Subordinate credit spread
Senior credit support
IO discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Non-securitizable loan dollar price
Single-family rental loans held by
CAFL
3,488,074 Liability price
Bridge loans
Multifamily loans held by Freddie
Mac K-Series (2)
944,606 Discount rate
473,514 Liability price
Trading and AFS securities
377,411 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Default rate
Loss severity
CRT dollar price
Servicer advance investments
350,923 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Expected remaining life (3)
Mortgage servicing income
MSRs
12,438 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Per loan annual cost to service
Excess MSRs
44,231 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Excess mortgage servicing amount
F- 50
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Table 5.7 – Fair Value Methodology for Level 3 Financial Instruments (continued)
Fair
Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Input Values
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands, except
Input Values)
Assets (continued)
Shared Home Appreciation Options $
33,187 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Home Price Appreciation
HEIs held by Point HEI entity
REO
$ 159,553 Liability price
588 Loss severity
Residential loan purchase
commitments, net
3,464 Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
10 -
1 -
3 -
9 -
20 -
10 %
24 %
4 %
N/A
100 %
20 %
Weighted
Average
10 %
17 %
3 %
N/A
17 %
20 %
Single-family rental interest rate
lock commitments
Whole loan spread to TBA price
Whole loan spread to swap rate
Pull-through rate
Committed sales price
$ 2.56 - $ 2.56
$ 2.56
185 -
7 -
185 bps
100 %
185 bps
69 %
$ 101.97 - $ 102.62
$ 102.07
666 Senior credit spread
85 -
85 bps
85 bps
Subordinate credit spread
Senior credit support
IO discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Pull-through rate
125 - 1,517 bps
30 -
8 -
3 -
100
30 %
8 %
3 %
100 %
450 bps
30 %
8 %
3 %
100 %
Liabilities
ABS issued (2)
At consolidated Sequoia entities
3,610,929 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Default rate
Loss severity
At consolidated CAFL SFR
entities (4)
3,207,444 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Default rate
Loss severity
At consolidated Freddie Mac
SLST entities
1,445,507 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Default rate
Loss severity
At consolidated Freddie Mac K-
Series entities (4)
At consolidated Point HEI
entities(4)
441,857 Discount rate
137,410 Discount rate
Prepayment rate (annual CPR)
Default rate
Loss severity
Home price appreciation
F- 51
1 -
7 -
— -
25 -
1 -
3 -
5 -
30 -
2 -
6 -
9 -
35 -
1 -
18 %
50 %
37 %
50 %
12 %
3 %
20 %
30 %
7 %
8 %
10 %
35 %
8 %
4 -
15 %
20 -
6 -
25 -
3 -
20 %
6 %
25 %
4 %
4 %
28 %
1 %
32 %
3 %
3 %
8 %
30 %
3 %
6 %
9 %
35 %
2 %
5 %
20 %
6 %
25 %
3 %
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Footnotes to Table 5.7
(1) The weighted average input values for all loan types are based on the unpaid principal balance. The weighted average input values for all other
assets and liabilities are based on relative fair value.
(2) The fair value of the loans held by consolidated entities was based on the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities, including securities we
own, which we determined were more readily observable, in accordance with accounting guidance for collateralized financing entities. At
December 31, 2021, the fair value of securities we owned at the consolidated Sequoia, CAFL SFR, Freddie Mac SLST, Freddie Mac K-Series,
and Point HEI entities was $248 million, $302 million, $445 million, $32 million, and $10 million, respectively.
(3) Represents the estimated average duration of outstanding servicer advances at a given point in time (not taking into account new advances made
with respect to the pool).
(4) As a market convention, certain securities are priced to a no-loss yield and therefore do not include default and loss severity assumptions.
Determination of Fair Value
A description of the instruments measured at fair value as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 valuation hierarchy is listed herein. We generally use both market comparable information and
discounted cash flow modeling techniques to determine the fair value of our Level 3 assets and liabilities. Use of these techniques
requires determination of relevant inputs and assumptions, some of which represent significant unobservable inputs as indicated in the
preceding table. Accordingly, a significant increase or decrease in any of these inputs – such as anticipated credit losses, prepayment
rates, interest rates, or other valuation assumptions – in isolation would likely result in a significantly lower or higher fair value
measurement.
Residential loans, business purpose loans, multifamily loans and HEI at consolidated entities
We have elected to account for most of our consolidated securitization entities as collateralized financing entities in accordance
with GAAP. A CFE is a variable interest entity that holds financial assets and issues beneficial interests in those assets, and these
beneficial interests have contractual recourse only to the related assets of the CFE. Accounting guidance for CFEs allows companies to
elect to measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE using the more observable of the fair value of the financial
assets or fair value of the financial liabilities. Pursuant to this guidance, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by the CFEs (which
we determined to be more observable) to determine the fair value of the loans held at these entities, whereby the net assets we
consolidate in our financial statements related to these entities represent the estimated fair value of our retained interests in the CFEs.
Residential loans at Redwood
Estimated fair values for residential loans are determined using models that incorporate various observable inputs, including
pricing information from whole loan sales and securitizations. Certain significant inputs in these models are considered unobservable
and are therefore Level 3 in nature. Significant pricing inputs obtained from market whole loan transaction activity include indicative
spreads to indexed TBA prices and indexed swap rates for fixed-rate loans and indexed swap rates for hybrid loans (Level 3).
Significant pricing inputs obtained from market securitization activity include indicative spreads to indexed TBA prices for senior
MBS and indexed swap rates for subordinate MBS, senior credit support levels, and assumed future prepayment rates (Level 3). These
assets would generally decrease in value based upon an increase in the credit spread, prepayment speed, or credit support assumptions.
Business purpose loans
Business purpose loans include single-family rental loans and bridge loans. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis for these
assets are predominantly Level 3 in nature, due to the lack of readily available market quotes and related inputs.
Estimated fair values for our securitizable single-family rental loans are determined using models that incorporate various inputs,
including pricing information from market comparable securitizations. Certain significant inputs in these models are considered
unobservable and are therefore Level 3 in nature. Significant pricing inputs obtained from market activity include indicative spreads to
indexed swap rates for senior and subordinate MBS, IO MBS discount rates, senior credit support levels, and assumed future
prepayment rates (Level 3). These assets would generally decrease in value based upon an increase in the credit spread, prepayment
speed, or credit support assumptions. Non-securitizable single-family rental loans are generally comprised of performing loans that
cannot be securitized and certain delinquent loans, and are valued at a dollar price that is informed by various market data, including
the estimated fair value of the collateral securing the loan, for which we typically receive third-party appraisals (Level 3).
F- 52
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Prices for our bridge loans are determined using discounted cash flow modeling, which incorporates a primary significant
unobservable input of discount rate. Cash flows for performing loans are generally based on contractual loan terms, whereas cash
flows for delinquent loans are generally based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, for which we typically receive
third-party appraisals (Level 3). These assets would generally decrease in value based upon an increase in the discount rate.
Real estate securities
Real estate securities include residential, multifamily, and other mortgage-backed securities that are generally illiquid in nature
and trade infrequently. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis for these assets are predominantly Level 3 in nature, due to the lack
of readily available market quotes and related inputs. For real estate securities, we utilize both market comparable pricing and
discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques. Relevant market indicators that are factored into the analysis include bid/ask
spreads, the amount and timing of credit losses, interest rates, and collateral prepayment rates. Estimated fair values are based on
applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). These cash flow models use significant unobservable
inputs such as a discount rate, prepayment rate, default rate and loss severity. The estimated fair value of our securities would
generally decrease based upon an increase in discount rate, default rates, loss severities, or a decrease in prepayment rates.
Derivative assets and liabilities
Our derivative instruments include swaps, swaptions, TBAs, interest rate futures, loan purchase commitments, and forward sale
commitments. Fair values of derivative instruments are determined using quoted prices from active markets, when available, or from
valuation models and are supported by valuations provided by dealers active in derivative markets. Fair values of TBAs and interest
rate futures are generally obtained using quoted prices from active markets (Level 1). Our derivative valuation models for swaps and
swaptions require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility,
prepayment rates, and correlations of certain inputs. Model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve
significant management judgment (Level 2).
LPC, IRLC and FSC fair values for residential jumbo and single-family rental loans are estimated based on the estimated fair
values of the underlying loans (as described in "Residential loans at Redwood" and "Business purpose loans" above). In addition, fair
values for LPCs and IRLCs are estimated based on the probability that the mortgage loan will be purchased or originated (the "Pull-
through rate") (Level 3).
Servicer advance investments
Estimated fair values for servicer advance investments are determined through internal pricing models that estimate future cash
flows and utilize certain significant inputs that are considered unobservable and are therefore Level 3 in nature. Our estimations of
cash flows include the combined cash flows of all of the components that comprise the servicer advance investments: existing
advances, the requirement to purchase future advances, the recovery of advances, and the right to a portion of the associated mortgage
servicing fee ("mortgage servicing income"). The valuation technique is based on discounted cash flows. Significant inputs used in the
valuations include prepayment rate (of the loans underlying the investments), mortgage servicing income, servicer advance WAL (the
weighted-average expected remaining life of servicer advances), and discount rate. These assets would generally decrease in value
based upon an increase in prepayment rates, an increase in servicer advance WAL, an increase in discount rate, or a decrease in
mortgage servicing income.
MSRs
MSRs include the rights to service jumbo residential mortgage loans. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are
predominantly Level 3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. Changes in the fair value
of MSRs occur primarily due to the collection/realization of expected cash flows, as well as changes in valuation inputs and
assumptions. Estimated fair values are based on applying the inputs to generate the net present value of estimated future MSR income
(Level 3). These discounted cash flow models utilize certain significant unobservable inputs including market discount rates, assumed
future prepayment rates of serviced loans, and the market cost of servicing. An increase in these unobservable inputs would generally
reduce the estimated fair value of the MSRs.
F- 53
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Excess MSRs
Estimated fair values for excess MSRs are determined through internal pricing models that estimate future cash flows and utilize
certain significant inputs that are considered unobservable and are therefore Level 3 in nature. The valuation technique is based on
discounted cash flows. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuations include prepayment rate (of the loans underlying the
investments), the amount of excess servicing income expected to be received ("excess mortgage servicing income"), and discount rate.
These assets would generally decrease in value based upon an increase in prepayment rates or discount rate, or a decrease in excess
mortgage servicing income.
HEI at Redwood
Estimated fair values for home equity investment contracts are determined through internal pricing models that estimate future
cash flows and utilize certain significant unobservable inputs such as forecasted home price appreciation, prepayment rates, default
rate, loss severity and discount rate, and are therefore Level 3 in nature. The valuation technique is based on discounted cash flows. An
increase in discount rate, default rate or loss severity, or a decrease in expected future home values combined with a decrease in
prepayment rates, would generally reduce the estimated fair value of the HEIs.
Other Investments
Certain of our Other investments (comprised of strategic investments in early-stage start-up companies) are Level 3 financial
instruments that we account for under the fair value option. These investments generally take the form of equity or debt with
conversion features and do not have readily determinable fair values. We initially record these investments at cost and adjust their fair
value based on observable price changes, such as follow-on capital raises or secondary sales, and will also evaluate impacts to
valuation from changing market conditions and underlying business performance.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and
money market fund investments which are generally invested in U.S. government securities and are available to us on a daily basis.
Fair values equal carrying values (Level 1).
Restricted cash
Restricted cash primarily includes interest-earning cash balances related to risk-sharing transactions with the Agencies, cash held
in association with borrowings from the FHLBC, cash held at Servicing Investment entities, and cash held at consolidated Sequoia
entities for the purpose of distribution to investors and reinvestment. Due to the short-term nature of the restrictions, fair values
approximate carrying values (Level 1).
Accrued interest receivable and payable
Accrued interest receivable and payable includes interest due on our assets and payable on our liabilities. Due to the short-term
nature of when these interest payments will be received or paid, fair values approximate carrying values (Level 1).
Real estate owned
Real estate owned ("REO") includes properties owned in satisfaction of foreclosed loans. Fair values are determined using
available market quotes, appraisals, broker price opinions, comparable properties, or other indications of value (Level 3).
Margin receivable
Margin receivable reflects cash collateral we have posted with our various derivative and debt counterparties as required to satisfy
margin requirements. Fair values approximate carrying values (Level 2).
F- 54
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Short-term debt
Short-term debt includes our credit facilities for residential and business purpose loans and real estate securities as well as non-
recourse short-term borrowings used to finance servicer advance investments. As these borrowings are secured and subject to margin
calls and as the rates on these borrowings reset frequently to market rates, we believe that carrying values approximate fair values
(Level 2).
ABS issued
ABS issued includes asset-backed securities issued through the Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia, and CAFL securitization entities, as
well as securities issued by certain third-party Freddie Mac K-Series and SLST securitization entities that we consolidate. These
instruments are generally illiquid in nature and trade infrequently. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level
3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. For ABS issued, we utilize both market
comparable pricing and discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques. Relevant market indicators factored into the analysis
include bid/ask spreads, the amount and timing of collateral credit losses, interest rates, and collateral prepayment rates. Estimated fair
values incorporate market indicators as well as other significant unobservable inputs to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3).
These cash flow models use significant unobservable inputs such as discount rate, prepayment rate, default rate, and loss severity. A
decrease in credit losses or discount rates, or an increase in prepayment rates, would generally cause the fair value of the ABS issued
to decrease (i.e., become a larger liability).
Financial Instruments Carried at Amortized Cost
Guarantee obligations
In association with our risk-sharing transactions with the Agencies, we have made certain guarantees which are carried on our
balance sheet at amortized cost (Level 3).
ABS issued
We account for certain ABS issued by securitizations we consolidate at amortized cost (Level 3).
Subordinate securities financing facilities
Borrowings under our subordinate securities financing facilities are secured by real estate securities and carried at unpaid
principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs (Level 3).
Non-Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
Borrowings under our non-recourse business purpose loans financing facilities are secured by bridge loans and other BPL
investments and carried at unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs (Level 3).
Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
Borrowings under our recourse business purpose loan financing facilities are secured by bridge loans and single-family rental
loans and carried at unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs (Level 3).
Recourse Revolving Debt Facility
Borrowings under our recourse revolving debt facility are secured by MSRs and certificated mortgage servicing rights and carried
at unpaid principal balance (Level 3).
F- 55
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (continued)
Convertible notes
Convertible notes include unsecured convertible and exchangeable senior notes that are carried at their unpaid principal balance
net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs. The fair value of the convertible notes is determined using quoted prices in generally
active markets (Level 2).
Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes
Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes are carried at their unpaid principal balance net of any unamortized deferred
issuance costs (Level 3).
Note 6. Residential Loans
We acquire residential loans from third-party originators and may sell or securitize these loans or hold them for investment. The
following table summarizes the classifications and carrying values of the residential loans owned at Redwood and at consolidated
Sequoia and Freddie Mac SLST entities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.1 – Classifications and Carrying Values of Residential Loans
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Held-for-sale at fair value
Held-for-investment at fair value
Total Residential Loans
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Held-for-sale at fair value
Held-for-investment at fair value
Total Residential Loans
Redwood
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
Freddie Mac
SLST
Total
1,845,282 $
— $
— $
— $
1,845,282
—
230,455
3,628,465
1,888,230
5,747,150
1,845,282 $
230,455 $
3,628,465 $
1,888,230 $
7,592,432
Redwood
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
Freddie Mac
SLST
Total
176,641 $
— $
— $
— $
176,641
—
285,935
1,565,322
2,221,153
4,072,410
176,641 $
285,935 $
1,565,322 $
2,221,153 $
4,249,051
$
$
$
$
At December 31, 2021, we owned mortgage servicing rights associated with $1.74 billion (principal balance) of residential loans
owned at Redwood that were purchased from third-party originators. The value of these MSRs is included in the carrying value of the
associated loans on our consolidated balance sheets. We contract with licensed sub-servicers that perform servicing functions for these
loans.
F- 56
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Residential Loans Held-for-Sale
At Fair Value
The following table summarizes the characteristics of residential loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.2 – Characteristics of Residential Loans Held-for-Sale
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Market value of loans pledged as collateral under short-term borrowing agreements
Weighted average coupon
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Unpaid principal balance of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Fair value of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Number of loans in foreclosure
December 31, 2021
2,196
1,813,865
1,845,282
1,838,797
$
$
$
December 31, 2020
198
172,748
176,641
156,355
$
$
$
3.27 %
3.14 %
$
$
3
2,923
2,304
—
$
$
1
1,882
1,223
—
The following table provides the activity of residential loans held-for-sale during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.3 – Activity of Residential Loans Held-for-Sale
(In Thousands)
Principal balance of loans acquired (1)
Principal balance of loans sold
Principal balance of loans transferred to HFI
Net market valuation gains (losses) recorded (2)
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
12,916,155 $
4,374,201
8,244,221
2,957,694
76,144
6,463,741
274,048
(15,477)
Includes $200 million of loans acquired through calls of seven seasoned Sequoia securitizations.
(1)
(2) Net market valuation gains (losses) on residential loans held-for-sale are recorded primarily through Mortgage banking activities, net on our
consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 57
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Residential Loans Held-for-Investment at Fair Value
The following tables summarize the characteristics of the residential loans owned at Redwood and at consolidated Sequoia and
Freddie Mac SLST entities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.4 – Characteristics of Residential Loans Held-for-Investment
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Weighted average coupon
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (1)
Unpaid principal balance of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Fair value of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (2)
Number of loans in foreclosure
Unpaid principal balance of loans in foreclosure
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Weighted average coupon
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (1)
Unpaid principal balance of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Fair value of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (2)
Number of loans in foreclosure
Unpaid principal balance of loans in foreclosure
Legacy
Sequoia
1,583
264,057
230,455
Sequoia
4,300
$ 3,605,469
$ 3,628,465
Freddie Mac
SLST
11,986
$ 1,932,241
$ 1,888,230
1.54 %
3.14 %
4.51 %
32
7,482
N/A
10
2,188
$
$
18
15,124
N/A
2
1,624
$
$
1,208
212,961
N/A
241
43,637
Legacy
Sequoia
1,908
333,474
285,935
Sequoia
2,177
$ 1,550,454
$ 1,565,322
Freddie Mac
SLST
13,605
$ 2,247,771
$ 2,221,153
1.67 %
4.64 %
4.52 %
52
17,285
N/A
21
4,939
$
$
94
74,742
N/A
3
2,251
$
$
2,110
389,245
N/A
245
38,610
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(1) For loans held at consolidated entities, the number of loans greater than 90 days delinquent includes loans in foreclosure.
(2) The fair value of the loans held by consolidated entities was based on the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities, including securities we
own, which we determined were more readily observable, in accordance with accounting guidance for collateralized financing entities.
F- 58
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
The following table provides the activity of residential loans held-for-investment at Redwood during the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.5 – Activity of Residential Loans Held-for-Investment at Redwood
(In Thousands)
Fair value of loans transferred from HFS to HFI
Fair value of loans transferred from HFI to HFS
Net market valuation gains (losses) recorded (1)
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
— $
13,258
—
—
1,870,986
(93,314)
(1) Subsequent to the transfer of these loans to our investment portfolio, net market valuation gains (losses) on residential loans held-for-investment
at Redwood are recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
The following table provides the activity of residential loans held-for-investment at consolidated entities during the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.6 – Activity of Residential Loans Held-for-Investment at Consolidated Entities
(In Thousands)
Fair value of loans transferred from
HFS to HFI (1)
Net market valuation gains (losses)
recorded (2)
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Legacy
Sequoia
Freddie Mac
Sequoia
SLST
Legacy
Sequoia
Freddie Mac
Sequoia
SLST
N/A $ 3,035,100
N/A
N/A $
270,506
N/A
$
12,125 $
(66,727) $
(14,735) $
(30,900) $
(30,356) $
35,131
(1) Represents the transfer of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment associated with Sequoia securitizations.
(2) For loans held at our consolidated Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia, and Freddie Mac SLST entities, market value changes are based on the estimated
fair value of the associated ABS issued, pursuant to collateralized financing entity guidelines. The net impact to our income statement associated
with our economic investments in these securitization entities is presented in Table 5.6.
F- 59
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Residential Loan Characteristics
The following table presents the geographic concentration of residential loans recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.7 – Geographic Concentration of Residential Loans
Geographic Concentration
(by Principal)
California
Texas
Washington
Colorado
Florida
Arizona
New York
New Jersey
Illinois
Maryland
Ohio
Other states (none greater than 5%)
Total
Geographic Concentration
(by Principal)
California
Washington
Texas
Colorado
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Other states (none greater than 5%)
Total
December 31, 2021
Held-for-Sale
Held-for-
Investment at
Legacy Sequoia
Held-for-
Investment at
Sequoia
Held-for-
Investment at
Freddie Mac SLST
29 %
11 %
8 %
7 %
6 %
5 %
2 %
1 %
2 %
1 %
— %
28 %
100 %
18 %
5 %
1 %
2 %
14 %
1 %
11 %
5 %
3 %
2 %
5 %
33 %
100 %
35 %
12 %
5 %
6 %
4 %
3 %
2 %
1 %
4 %
2 %
— %
26 %
100 %
14 %
3 %
2 %
1 %
10 %
2 %
10 %
7 %
5 %
5 %
2 %
39 %
100 %
December 31, 2020
Held-for-Sale
Held-for-
Investment at
Legacy Sequoia
Held-for-
Investment at
Sequoia
17 %
1 %
5 %
3 %
14 %
3 %
2 %
5 %
10 %
5 %
35 %
100 %
43 %
7 %
10 %
5 %
3 %
3 %
2 %
1 %
1 %
— %
25 %
100 %
F- 60
34 %
5 %
10 %
3 %
6 %
2 %
1 %
2 %
5 %
— %
32 %
100 %
Held-for-
Investment at
Freddie Mac SLST
14 %
2 %
3 %
1 %
10 %
5 %
5 %
7 %
10 %
2 %
41 %
100 %
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
The following table displays the loan product type and accompanying loan characteristics of residential loans recorded on our
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 6.8 – Product Types and Characteristics of Residential Loans
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate(1)
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Held-for-Sale:
Hybrid ARM loans
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Fixed loans
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total Held-for-Sale
1.88 % to 1.88%
3.25 % to 3.50%
2.38 % to 3.63%
2.50 % to 4.00%
2.38 % to 3.88%
2032-11 - 2032-11
2042-08 - 2042-09
2042-04 - 2052-01
2042-06 - 2052-01
2042-01 - 2052-01
3.13 % to 5.00%
2.75 % to 5.50%
2.50 % to 5.88%
2.63 % to 5.63%
2.50 % to 4.75%
2026-04 - 2051-12
2026-12 - 2051-11
2026-12 - 2052-01
2041-07 - 2052-.01
2041-10 - 2052-.01
1
4
18
14
20
57
63
133
790
735
418
2,139
2,196
Held-for-Investment at Legacy Sequoia:
ARM loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
1,273
206
68
15
12
1,574
Hybrid ARM loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$250
$500
$750
to
to
to
over $1,000
Total HFI at Legacy Sequoia:
3
4
1
1
9
1,583
0.38 % to 5.63%
0.75 % to 3.88%
0.25 % to 4.13%
0.75 % to 3.75%
0.88 % to 2.00%
2022-01 - 2035-11
2024-05 - 2035-11
2027-05 - 2035-07
2028-03 - 2036-03
2028-06 - 2035-04
2.63 % to 2.63%
2.50 % to 2.63%
2.50 % to 2.50%
2.63 % to 2.63%
2033-09 - 2033-10
2033-07 - 2034-03
2033-08 - 2033-08
2033-09 - 2033-09
F- 61
$
45 $
1,880
11,872
12,288
25,308
51,393
11,118
51,737
514,785
642,372
542,460
1,762,472
$ 1,813,865 $
$
$
115,437 $
71,306
42,128
12,868
18,668
260,407
650
1,341
518
1,140
3,649
264,056 $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
3,189 $
2,831
555
1,811
1,175
9,561
—
—
—
—
—
9,561 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,093
—
1,830
2,923
2,923
2,691
2,124
1,842
825
—
7,482
—
—
—
—
—
7,482
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Table 6.8 – Product Types and Characteristics of Residential Loans (continued)
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Held-for-Investment at Sequoia:
Hybrid ARM loans
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
to
$250
to
$500
to
$750
$1,000
to
over $1,000
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate(1)
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
2
3
8
8
7
28
43
162
1,691
1,497
879
4,272
4,300
5.50 % to 6.75%
3.25 % to 3.63%
3.38 % to 4.50%
3.13 % to 5.00%
3.50 % to 5.00%
2048-03 - 2048-09
2047-04 - 2049-06
2044-04 - 2049-08
2047-06 - 2049-08
2044-11 - 2050-01
2.75 % to 5.13%
2.50 % to 6.13%
2.13 % to 6.75%
2.13 % to 6.25%
1.88 % to 5.88%
2029-04 - 2051-06
2033-06 - 2051-09
2031-04 - 2051-12
2036-12 - 2051-11
2036-07 - 2051-11
$
397 $
1,354
5,321
6,659
8,934
22,665
191 $
—
—
—
—
191
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
8,630 $
69,442
1,093,766
1,311,640
1,099,328
3,582,806
$ 3,605,471 $
— $
2,390
10,894
9,477
8,508
31,269
31,460 $
—
462
3,498
4,931
6,233
15,124
15,124
Held-for-Investment at Freddie Mac SLST:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$250
$500
$750
to
to
to
over $1,000
9,798
2,141
46
1
11,986
Total Held-for-Investment
$ 1,224,173 $ 222,541 $ 114,622
91,149
7,190
—
$ 1,932,241 $ 341,046 $ 212,961
681,885
25,165
1,018
114,360
3,127
1,018
2.00 % to 11.00%
2.00 % to 7.75%
2.00 % to 5.88%
4.00 % to 4.00%
2021-12
2035-08
2043-08
2056-03
2061-10
2059-08
2059-01
2056-03
F- 62
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Table 6.8 – Product Types and Characteristics of Residential Loans (continued)
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate(1)
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Held-for-Sale:
Hybrid ARM loans
$ —
$ 751
to
to
$250
$1,000
Fixed loans
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Held-for-Sale
1
1
2
1
—
75
80
40
196
198
Held-for-Investment at Legacy Sequoia:
ARM loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
1,524
251
79
27
18
1,899
Hybrid ARM loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$250
$500
$750
to
to
to
over $1,000
Total HFI at Legacy Sequoia:
2
5
1
1
9
1,908
2.00 % to 2.00%
4.38 % to 4.38%
2032-11 - 2032-11
2047-10 - 2047-10
$
4.69 % to 4.69%
— % to —%
2.50 % to 5.50%
2.38 % to 4.63%
2.38 % to 5.00%
2044-03 - 2044-03
0 - 0
2045-12 - 2051-01
2050-04 - 2051-01
2040-11 - 2051-01
0.25 % to 5.63%
0.50 % to 4.13%
0.25 % to 4.13%
0.75 % to 3.75%
1.00 % to 2.38%
2020-10 - 2036-05
2024-05 - 2035-11
2027-05 - 2035-01
2028-03 - 2036-03
2028-05 - 2035-04
2.63 % to 2.63%
2.63 % to 4.00%
2.75 % to 2.75%
2.63 % to 2.63%
2033-09 - 2033-10
2033-07 - 2034-03
2033-08 - 2033-08
2033-09 - 2033-09
$
$
$
49 $
970
1,019
219
—
48,933
71,137
51,440
171,729
172,748 $
146,100 $
86,676
48,437
21,875
26,422
329,510
439
1,748
556
1,221
3,964
333,474 $
— $
970
970
219
—
1,127
—
1,046
2,392
3,362 $
4,208 $
1,908
714
—
—
6,830
—
410
—
—
410
7,240 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,882
1,882
1,882
3,966
4,392
1,192
3,175
4,560
17,285
—
—
—
—
—
17,285
F- 63
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 6. Residential Loans - (continued)
Table 6.8 – Product Types and Characteristics of Residential Loans (continued)
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Held-for-Investment at Sequoia:
Hybrid ARM loans
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate(1)
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
3
5
19
15
12
54
48
285
1,004
556
230
2,123
2,177
5.50 % to 6.75%
3.50 % to 3.63%
3.25 % to 4.75%
3.13 % to 5.00%
3.50 % to 5.00%
2048-03 - 2048-10
2046-11 - 2049-06
2044-04 - 2049-09
2043-12 - 2049-08
2044-11 - 2050-02
2.75 % to
3.13 % to
3 % to
3.25 % to
3.15 % to
5.50 % 2029-04 -
6.13 % 2033-06 -
6.75 % 2031-04 -
6.50 % 2036-12 -
5.88 % 2036-07 -
2049-09
2050-03
2050-04
2050-04
2050-04
$
607 $
2,196
12,214
12,911
15,716
43,644
$
9,508 $
122,327
617,488
478,938
278,549
1,506,810
$ 1,550,454 $
— $
440
682
960
—
2,082
— $
4,728
15,214
10,482
4,868
35,292
37,374 $
—
—
671
1,744
—
2,415
191
2,225
24,842
21,155
23,914
72,327
74,742
$ 1,407,107 $ 283,745 $ 206,724
172,995
9,526
—
$ 2,247,771 $ 434,815 $ 389,245
811,191
28,461
1,012
143,195
6,863
1,012
Held-for-Investment at Freddie Mac SLST:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
to
to
to
over $1,000
Total HFI at Freddie Mac SLST:
11,007
2,545
52
1
13,605
$250
$500
$750
2.00 % to 11.00%
2.00 % to 7.75%
2.00 % to 6.75%
4.00 % to 4.00%
2020-12 - 2059-10
2035-05 - 2059-01
2043-08 - 2058-07
2056-03 - 2056-03
(1) Rate is net of servicing fee for consolidated loans for which we do not own the MSR.
F- 64
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans
We originate and invest in business purpose loans, including single-family rental ("SFR") loans and bridge loans. The following
table summarizes the classifications and carrying values of the business purpose loans owned at Redwood and at consolidated CAFL
entities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 7.1 – Classifications and Carrying Values of Business Purpose Loans
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Held-for-sale at fair value
Held-for-investment at fair value
Total Business Purpose Loans
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Held-for-sale at fair value
Held-for-investment at fair value
Total Business Purpose Loans
Single-Family Rental
CAFL
Redwood
Bridge
Redwood
CAFL
Total
358,309 $
— $
— $
— $
358,309
—
3,488,074
666,364
278,242
4,432,680
358,309 $
3,488,074 $
666,364 $
278,242 $
4,790,989
Single-Family Rental
CAFL
Redwood
Single-Family Rental
CAFL
Redwood
245,394 $
— $
— $
—
3,249,194
641,765
245,394 $
3,249,194 $
641,765 $
Total
— $
245,394
—
3,890,959
— $
4,136,353
$
$
$
$
Nearly all of the outstanding single-family rental loans at December 31, 2021 were first-lien, fixed-rate loans with original
maturities of five, seven, or ten years, with less than 2% with original maturities of 30 years.
The outstanding bridge loans held-for-investment at December 31, 2021 were first-lien, interest-only loans with original
maturities of six to 24 months and were comprised of 75% one-month LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate loans and 25% fixed-rate loans.
F- 65
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
Business Purpose Loans at Redwood
The following table provides the activity of business purpose loans during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 7.2 – Activity of Business Purpose Loans
(In Thousands)
Principal balance of loans originated
Principal balance of loans acquired
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2021
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2020
HFS SFR at
Redwood
Bridge at
Redwood
HFS SFR at
Redwood
Bridge at
Redwood
$
1,254,913 $
894,908 $
979,696 $
451,554
68,804
65,315
—
—
Principal balance of loans sold to third parties
Fair value of loans transferred (1)
Fair value of loans transferred from HFI to HFS (2)
Mortgage banking activities income (loss) recorded (3)
Investment fair value changes recorded (4)
(1) Represents the transfer of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment associated with CAFL SFR securitizations and the transfer of bridge
(20,806)
1,116,443
1,292,633
(10,629)
358,884
193,963
110,836
(2,916)
63,206
81,032
25,151
92,455
9,484
7,187
1,483
N/A
N/A
—
—
—
loans from "Bridge at Redwood" to "Bridge at CAFL" resulting from their securitization.
(2) Represents the transfer of single-family rental loans from held-for-investment to held-for-sale associated with the call of consolidated CAFL
securitizations during 2021.
(3) Represents net market valuation changes from the time a loan is originated to when it is sold or transferred to our investment portfolio.
Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 we recorded loan origination fee income of $34 million and $19 million,
respectively, through Mortgage banking activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
(4) Represents net market valuation changes for loans classified as held-for-investment.
At December 31, 2021, we had a $625 million commitment to fund bridge loans. See Note 16 for additional information on this
commitment.
Business Purpose Loans Held-for-Investment at CAFL
We invest in securities issued by CAFL securitizations sponsored by CoreVest and consolidate the underlying single-family
rental loans and bridge loans owned by these entities. The following table provides the activity of business purpose loans held-for-
investment at CAFL during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 7.3 – Activity of Business Purpose Loans Held-for-Investment at CAFL
(In Thousands)
Net market valuation gains (losses) recorded (1)
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
SFR at
CAFL
Bridge at
CAFL
SFR at
CAFL
Bridge at
CAFL
$
(158,081) $
(1,548) $
32,331 $
—
(1) For loans held at our consolidated CAFL entities, market value changes are based on the estimated fair value of the associated ABS issued,
including securities we own, pursuant to collateralized financing entity guidelines. The net impact to our income statement associated with our
economic investments in these securitization entities is presented in Table 4.2.
REO
See Note 12 for detail on BPL loans transferred to REO during 2021.
F- 66
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
Business Purpose Loan Characteristics
The following tables summarize the characteristics of the business purpose loans owned at Redwood at December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Table 7.4 – Characteristics of Business Purpose Loans
December 31, 2021
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Weighted average coupon
Weighted average remaining loan term (years)
Market value of loans pledged as collateral under short-term
debt facilities
Market value of loans pledged as collateral under long-term
debt facilities
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (1)
Unpaid principal balance of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Fair value of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (2)
Number of loans in foreclosure
Unpaid principal balance of loans in foreclosure
Fair value of loans in foreclosure (2)
December 31, 2020
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Weighted average coupon
Weighted average remaining loan term (years)
Market value of loans pledged as collateral under short-term
debt facilities
Market value of loans pledged as collateral under long-term
debt facilities
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (1)
Unpaid principal balance of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Fair value of loans with 90+ day delinquencies (2)
Number of loans in foreclosure
Unpaid principal balance of loans in foreclosure
Fair value of loans in foreclosure (2)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
SFR at
Redwood
245
348,232
358,309
SFR at
CAFL
1,173
$ 3,340,949
$ 3,488,074
Bridge at
Redwood
1,134
670,392
666,364
$
$
Bridge at
CAFL
1,640
274,617
278,242
$
$
4.73 %
12
5.17 %
6
6.91 %
1
75,873
244,703
N/A $
91,814
N/A $
554,597
6
5,384
4,238
7
5,473
4,305
$
$
18
41,998
$
N/A $
9
12,648
$
N/A $
31
18,032
14,218
28
18,043
14,257
SFR at
Redwood
65
234,475
245,394
SFR at
CAFL
1,094
$ 3,017,137
$ 3,249,194
Bridge at
Redwood
1,725
649,532
641,765
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4.84 %
8
5.44 %
5
8.09 %
1
34,098
154,774
N/A $
92,931
N/A $
544,151
10
7,127
6,143
—
—
—
$
$
22
61,440
$
N/A $
10
24,745
$
N/A $
31
39,415
33,605
25
38,552
33,066
$
$
$
$
7.05 %
1
N/A
N/A
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bridge at
CAFL
—
—
—
— %
—
N/A
N/A
—
—
—
—
—
—
F- 67
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
Footnotes to Table 7.4
(1) The number of loans greater than 90 days delinquent includes loans in foreclosure.
(2) The fair value of the loans held by consolidated entities was based on the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities, including securities we
own, which we determined were more readily observable, in accordance with accounting guidance for collateralized financing entities.
The following table presents the geographic concentration of business purpose loans recorded on our consolidated balance sheets
at December 31, 2021.
Table 7.5 – Geographic Concentration of Business Purpose Loans
Geographic Concentration
(by Principal)
Florida
Texas
Alabama
Connecticut
New Jersey
New York
Georgia
California
Illinois
Tennessee
Other states (none greater than 5%)
Total
December 31, 2021
SFR at Redwood
SFR at CAFL
Bridge at Redwood
Bridge at CAFL
15 %
11 %
11 %
9 %
7 %
2 %
5 %
5 %
2 %
— %
33 %
100 %
7 %
15 %
3 %
6 %
8 %
2 %
5 %
5 %
5 %
3 %
41 %
100 %
10 %
7 %
9 %
4 %
9 %
2 %
20 %
3 %
4 %
11 %
21 %
100 %
17 %
13 %
3 %
3 %
12 %
9 %
7 %
5 %
4 %
2 %
25 %
100 %
F- 68
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
December 31, 2020
Geographic Concentration
(by Principal)
Texas
New Jersey
Georgia
Florida
Connecticut
New York
Arizona
California
Illinois
Alabama
Indiana
Tennessee
Other states (none greater than 5%)
Total
SFR at Redwood
SFR at CAFL
Bridge at Redwood
Bridge at CAFL
24 %
17 %
12 %
10 %
8 %
5 %
5 %
5 %
5 %
2 %
2 %
— %
5 %
100 %
15 %
11 %
5 %
8 %
4 %
1 %
2 %
5 %
4 %
3 %
3 %
3 %
36 %
100 %
4 %
9 %
8 %
11 %
1 %
8 %
1 %
13 %
7 %
6 %
5 %
6 %
21 %
100 %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
— %
F- 69
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
The following table displays the loan product type and accompanying loan characteristics of business purpose loans recorded on
our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021.
Table 7.6 – Product Types and Characteristics of Business Purpose Loans
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
SFR at Redwood:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total SFR at Redwood:
SFR at CAFL:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total SFR at CAFL:
Bridge at Redwood
Fixed Loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
to
$250
to
$500
to
$750
$1,000
to
over $1,000
Floating Loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total Bridge at Redwood:
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
74
57
28
12
74
245
5
73
199
134
762
1,173
115
26
13
9
24
187
737
123
9
12
66
947
1,134
3.75 % to 7.75%
3.75 % to 6.50%
3.75 % to 6.70%
4.13 % to 5.43%
3.38 % to 7.15%
2048-11 - 2052-01
2026-01 - 2052-01
2021-01 - 2052-01
2026-12 - 2052-01
2020-01 - 2052-01
5.77 % to 6.80%
4.64 % to 7.03%
4.00 % to 7.06%
4.20 % to 7.23%
3.81 % to 7.57%
2023-01 - 2024-04
2022-02 - 2031-02
2022-02 - 2031-10
2022-03 - 2031-09
2022-03 - 2030-10
5.95 % to 12.00%
5.95 % to 10.00%
6.70 % to 10.00%
5.45 % to 10.00%
5.45 % to 10.00%
2019-08 - 2023-11
2020-05 - 2023-09
2021-02 - 2022-11
2021-09 - 2022-10
2020-07 - 2023-10
4.25 % to 10.00%
4.25 % to 8.25%
5.75 % to 8.60%
5.75 % to 7.50%
4.90 % to 9.50%
2019-08 - 2023-11
2020-05 - 2023-12
2021-03 - 2024-02
2020-12 - 2024-02
2021-03 - 2024-12
$
$
$
11,515 $
21,284
16,773
9,764
288,896
348,232 $
398 $
32,106
123,685
116,724
3,068,036
$ 3,340,949 $
89 $
—
—
—
—
89 $
171
—
536
—
4,677
5,384
20 $
466
717
788
26,481
28,472 $
—
257
1,224
—
40,518
41,999
$
$
$
12,850 $
9,294
8,498
7,544
57,880
96,066
65,611 $
42,248
5,724
10,200
450,543
574,326
670,392 $
426 $
253
637
980
11,699
13,995
773 $
—
—
945
1,680
3,398
17,393 $
1,493
1,619
2,012
—
11,992
17,116
—
—
—
916
—
916
18,032
F- 70
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
Bridge at CAFL:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
$1,000
to
over $1,000
Floating Loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
808
70
24
7
11
920
681
13
5
3
18
720
5.45 % to 10.65%
5.95 % to 10.50%
5.95 % to 9.99%
5.45 % to 8.99%
6.25 % to 9.00%
2022-01 - 2023-05
2022-01 - 2023-03
2022-01 - 2023-08
2022-01 - 2023-04
2022-01 - 2023-11
5.85 % to 10.50%
5.95 % to 8.35%
5.75 % to 8.50%
6.75 % to 7.25%
5.75 % to 10.00%
2021-10 - 2023-09
2021-10 - 2023-09
2021-10 - 2023-10
2022-04 - 2023-06
2021-11 - 2023-12
$
$
58,110 $
23,488
15,041
6,375
32,864
135,878
— $
—
—
—
—
—
77,001 $
4,088
3,097
2,546
52,007
2,091 $
783
552
—
—
138,739
3,426
Total Bridge at CAFL:
1,640
$
274,617 $
3,426 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
F- 71
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 7. Business Purpose Loans - (continued)
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
SFR HFS:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
$1,000
to
over $1,000
Total SFR HFS:
SFR HFI at CAFL:
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total SFR HFI at CAFL:
Residential Bridge
Fixed loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Floating Loans:
$ —
$ 251
$ 501
$ 751
$250
to
$500
to
$750
to
to
$1,000
over $1,000
Total Residential Bridge:
Number
of
Loans
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
8
1
6
10
40
65
5
67
212
131
679
1,094
393
90
31
12
65
591
1,047
20
8
9
50
1,134
1,725
6.25 % to 7.75%
5.97 % to 5.97%
5.84 % to 6.75%
5.15 % to 6.39%
3.82 % to 5.95%
2027-03 - 2050-03
2021-02 - 2021-02
2026-01 - 2031-01
2020-05 - 2031-01
2020-07 - 2031-01
$
$
1,060 $
483
3,632
8,936
220,364
234,475 $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
635
—
—
1,815
4,677
7,127
5.77 % to 7.05%
4.64 % to 6.96%
4.12 % to 7.06%
4.33 % to 7.23%
3.93 % to 7.57%
2022-07 - 2030-08
2021-07 - 2031-01
2020-11 - 2030-12
2021-01 - 2031-01
2020-11 - 2031-01
$
1,016 $
29,977
130,665
113,874
2,741,605
$ 3,017,137 $
— $
—
—
764
3,867
4,631 $
—
—
1,752
750
58,938
61,440
6.99 % to 12.00%
6.99 % to 13.00%
6.99 % to 10.00%
6.99 % to 9.50%
6.04 % to 10.25%
2019-08 - 2022-12
2020-05 - 2021-11
2020-07 - 2021-10
2020-10 - 2022-03
2020-03 - 2022-12
5.75 % to 10.25%
6.65 % to 8.60%
7.05 % to 8.50%
6.50 % to 8.00%
6.50 % to 9.50%
2020-11 - 2022-08
2020-11 - 2021-12
2020-11 - 2021-10
2020-12 - 2021-11
2021-01 - 2022-12
$
$
$
$
$
44,225 $
30,472
18,843
10,430
203,215
307,185 $
84,371 $
7,135
4,940
7,795
238,105
342,346 $
649,531 $
6,530 $
945
—
—
—
7,475 $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
7,475 $
1,668
1,423
540
943
34,841
39,415
—
—
—
—
—
—
39,415
F- 72
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 8. Multifamily Loans
Since 2018, we have invested in multifamily subordinate securities issued by Freddie Mac K-Series securitization trusts and were
required to consolidate the underlying multifamily loans owned at these entities for financial reporting purposes in accordance with
GAAP. During the first quarter of 2020, we sold subordinate securities issued by four such Freddie Mac K-Series securitization trusts
and deconsolidated $3.85 billion of multifamily loans. See Note 2 for further discussion.
The following table summarizes the characteristics of the multifamily loans consolidated at Redwood at December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Table 8.1 – Characteristics of Multifamily Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Number of loans
Unpaid principal balance
Fair value of loans
Weighted average coupon
Weighted average remaining loan term (years)
Delinquency information
Number of loans with 90+ day delinquencies
Number of loans in foreclosure
December 31, 2021
28
455,168
473,514
$
$
December 31, 2020
28
462,808
492,221
$
$
4.25 %
4
—
—
4.25 %
5
—
—
The outstanding multifamily loans held-for-investment at the Freddie Mac K-Series entity at December 31, 2021 were first-lien,
fixed-rate loans that were originated in 2015 and had original loan terms of ten years. The following table provides the activity of
multifamily loans held-for-investment during the year months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 8.2 – Activity of Multifamily Loans Held-for-Investment
(In Thousands)
Net market valuation gains (losses) recorded (1)
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
(11,068) $
(58,821)
(1) Net market valuation gains (losses) on multifamily loans held-for-investment are recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our
consolidated statements of income (loss). For loans held at our consolidated Freddie Mac K-Series entities, market value changes are based on
the estimated fair value of the associated ABS issued, including securities we own, pursuant to collateralized financing entity guidelines. The net
impact to our income statement associated with our economic investment in these securitization entities is presented in Table 5.6.
F- 73
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 8. Multifamily Loans - (continued)
Multifamily Loan Characteristics
The following table presents the geographic concentration of multifamily loans recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2021.
Table 8.3 – Geographic Concentration of Multifamily Loans
Geographic Concentration
(by Principal)
California
Florida
North Carolina
Oregon
Hawaii
Tennessee
Other states (none greater than 5%)
Total
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
13 %
13 %
9 %
7 %
5 %
5 %
48 %
100 %
13 %
13 %
9 %
7 %
5 %
5 %
48 %
100 %
The following table displays the loan product type and accompanying loan characteristics of multifamily loans recorded on our
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021.
Table 8.4 – Product Types and Characteristics of Multifamily Loans
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Fixed loans:
$ 10,001
$ 20,001
to
to
Total:
$20,000
$30,000
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Loan Balance
Fixed loans:
$ 10,001
$ 20,001
to
to
Total:
$20,000
$30,000
Number
of
Loans
24
4
28
Number
of
Loans
24
4
28
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
4.25 % to 4.25%
4.25 % to 4.25%
2025-09 - 2025-09
2025-09 - 2025-09
$
$
364,811 $
90,357
455,168 $
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Total
Principal
30-89
Days
DQ
90+
Days
DQ
4.25 % to 4.25%
4.25 % to 4.25%
2025-09 - 2025-09
2025-09 - 2025-09
$
$
370,934 $
91,874
462,808 $
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
F- 74
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities
We invest in real estate securities that we create and retain from our Sequoia securitizations or acquire from third parties. The
following table presents the fair values of our real estate securities by type at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 9.1 – Fair Values of Real Estate Securities by Type
(In Thousands)
Trading
Available-for-sale
Total Real Estate Securities
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
170,619 $
206,792
377,411 $
125,667
218,458
344,125
Our real estate securities include mortgage-backed securities, which are presented in accordance with their general position within
a securitization structure based on their rights to cash flows. Senior securities are those interests in a securitization that generally have
the first right to cash flows and are last in line to absorb losses. Mezzanine securities are interests that are generally subordinate to
senior securities in their rights to receive cash flows, and have subordinate securities below them that are first to absorb losses.
Subordinate securities are all interests below mezzanine. Exclusive of our re-performing loan securities, nearly all of our residential
securities are supported by collateral that was designated as prime at the time of issuance.
Trading Securities
We elected the fair value option for certain securities and classify them as trading securities. Our trading securities include both
residential and multifamily mortgage-backed securities, and our residential securities also include securities backed by re-performing
loans ("RPL"). The following table presents the fair value of trading securities by position and collateral type at December 31, 2021
and 2020.
Table 9.2 – Fair Value of Trading Securities by Position
(In Thousands)
Senior
Interest-only securities (1)
Total Senior
Mezzanine
Sequoia securities
Total Mezzanine
Subordinate
RPL securities
Multifamily securities
Other third-party residential securities
Total Subordinate
Total Trading Securities
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
21,787 $
21,787
—
—
65,140
10,549
73,143
148,832
$
170,619 $
28,464
28,464
3,649
3,649
47,448
5,592
40,514
93,554
125,667
(1)
Includes $15 million and $13 million of Sequoia certificated mortgage servicing rights as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
F- 75
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities - (continued)
The following table presents the unpaid principal balance of trading securities by position and collateral type at December 31,
2021 and 2020.
Table 9.3 – Unpaid Principal Balance of Trading Securities by Position
(In Thousands)
Senior (1)
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Total Trading Securities
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
— $
—
235,306
235,306 $
—
3,577
242,278
245,855
(1) Our senior trading securities are comprised of interest-only securities, for which there is no principal balance.
The following table provides the activity of trading securities during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 9.4 – Trading Securities Activity
(In Thousands)
Principal balance of securities acquired (1)
Principal balance of securities sold (1)
Net market valuation gains (losses) recorded (2)
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
50,180 $
55,561
23,583
79,921
744,914
(230,731)
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, excludes $5 million and $11 million of securities bought and sold during the same quarter,
respectively.
(2) Net market valuation gains (losses) on trading securities are recorded through Investment fair value changes, net and Mortgage banking
activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
AFS Securities
The following table presents the fair value of our available-for-sale securities by position and collateral type at December 31,
2021 and 2020.
Table 9.5 – Fair Value of Available-for-Sale Securities by Position
(In Thousands)
Mezzanine
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Other third-party residential securities
$
Total Mezzanine
Subordinate
Sequoia securities
Multifamily securities
Other third-party residential securities
Total Subordinate
Total AFS Securities
— $
—
127,542
22,166
57,084
206,792
2,014
2,014
136,475
43,663
36,306
216,444
218,458
$
206,792 $
F- 76
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities - (continued)
The following table provides the activity of available-for-sale securities during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 9.6 – Available-for-Sale Securities Activity
(In Thousands)
Fair value of securities acquired (1)
Fair value of securities sold (1)
Principal balance of securities called
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
19,100 $
4,785
27,875
57,652
55,192
7
(1) For the the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, excludes $6 million and $0.5 million of securities bought and sold during the same
quarter, respectively.
We often purchase AFS securities at a discount to their outstanding principal balances. To the extent we purchase an AFS security
that has a likelihood of incurring a loss, we do not amortize into income the portion of the purchase discount that we do not expect to
collect due to the inherent credit risk of the security. We may also expense a portion of our investment in the security to the extent we
believe that principal losses will exceed the purchase discount. We designate any amount of unpaid principal balance that we do not
expect to receive and thus do not expect to earn or recover as a credit reserve on the security. Any remaining net unamortized
discounts or premiums on the security are amortized into income over time using the effective yield method.
At December 31, 2021, we had $19 million of AFS securities with contractual maturities less than five years, $4 million with
contractual maturities greater than five years but less than ten years, and the remainder of our AFS securities had contractual
maturities greater than ten years.
The following table presents the components of carrying value (which equals fair value) of AFS securities at December 31, 2021
and 2020.
Table 9.7 – Carrying Value of AFS Securities
December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Principal balance
Credit reserve
Unamortized discount, net
Amortized cost
Gross unrealized gains
Gross unrealized losses
CECL credit allowance
Carrying Value
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Total
$
— $
242,852 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
(27,555)
(76,023)
139,274
67,815
(297)
—
242,852
(27,555)
(76,023)
139,274
67,815
(297)
—
$
— $
206,792 $
206,792
F- 77
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities - (continued)
December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Principal balance
Credit reserve
Unamortized discount, net
Amortized cost
Gross unrealized gains
Gross unrealized losses
CECL credit allowance
Carrying Value
Mezzanine
Subordinate
Total
$
2,000 $
281,284 $
283,284
—
—
2,000
14
—
—
(44,967)
(95,718)
140,599
77,280
(1,047)
(388)
(44,967)
(95,718)
142,599
77,294
(1,047)
(388)
$
2,014 $
216,444 $
218,458
The following table presents the changes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, in unamortized discount and
designated credit reserves on residential AFS securities.
Table 9.8 – Changes in Unamortized Discount and Designated Credit Reserves on AFS Securities
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance
Amortization of net discount
Realized credit losses
Acquisitions
Sales, calls, other
Impairments
Transfers to (release of) credit reserves, net
Ending Balance
$
AFS Securities with Unrealized Losses
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Credit
Reserve
Unamortized
Discount, Net
Credit
Reserve
Unamortized
Discount, Net
$
44,967 $
—
(707)
2,825
(1,328)
—
(18,202)
27,555 $
95,718 $
(23,254)
—
1,208
(15,851)
—
18,202
32,940 $
—
(2,282)
7,248
(731)
—
7,792
76,023 $
44,967 $
124,255
(6,538)
—
2,634
(16,841)
—
(7,792)
95,718
The following table presents the components comprising the total carrying value of residential AFS securities that were in a gross
unrealized loss position at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 9.9 – Components of Fair Value of AFS Securities by Holding Periods
(In Thousands)
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Less Than 12 Consecutive Months
12 Consecutive Months or Longer
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
$
7,078 $
9,129
(251) $
(1,047)
6,827 $
7,920
1,600 $
—
(46) $
—
1,554
—
At December 31, 2021, after giving effect to purchases, sales, and extinguishment due to credit losses, our consolidated balance
sheet included 85 AFS securities, of which four were in an unrealized loss position and one was in a continuous unrealized loss
position for 12 consecutive months or longer. At December 31, 2020, our consolidated balance sheet included 96 AFS securities, of
which five were in an unrealized loss position and zero were in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 consecutive months or
longer.
F- 78
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities - (continued)
Evaluating AFS Securities for Credit Losses
Gross unrealized losses on our AFS securities were $0.3 million at December 31, 2021. We evaluate all securities in an unrealized
loss position to determine if the impairment is credit-related (resulting in an allowance for credit losses recorded in earnings) or non-
credit-related (resulting in an unrealized loss through other comprehensive income). At December 31, 2021, we did not intend to sell
any of our AFS securities that were in an unrealized loss position, and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell
these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at their maturity. We review our AFS securities that are in
an unrealized loss position to identify those securities with losses based on an assessment of changes in expected cash flows for such
securities, which considers recent security performance and expected future performance of the underlying collateral.
At December 31, 2021, our allowance for credit losses related to our AFS securities was zero. AFS securities for which an
allowance is recognized have experienced, or are expected to experience, credit-related adverse cash flow changes. In determining our
estimate of cash flows for AFS securities we may consider factors such as structural credit enhancement, past and expected future
performance of underlying mortgage loans, including timing of expected future cash flows, which are informed by prepayment rates,
default rates, loss severities, delinquency rates, percentage of non-performing loans, FICO scores at loan origination, year of
origination, loan-to-value ratios, and geographic concentrations, as well as general market assessments. Changes in our evaluation of
these factors impacted the cash flows expected to be collected at the assessment date and were used to determine if there were credit-
related adverse cash flows and if so, the amount of credit related losses. Significant judgment is used in both our analysis of the
expected cash flows for our AFS securities and any determination of security credit losses.
The following table details the activity related to the allowance for credit losses for AFS securities held at December 31, 2021.
Table 9.10 – Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance allowance for credit losses
Transition impact from adoption of ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit
Losses"
Additions to allowance for credit losses on securities for which credit losses were not
previously recorded
Additional increases or decreases to the allowance for credit losses on securities that
had an allowance recorded in a previous period
Allowance on purchased financial assets with credit deterioration
Reduction to allowance for securities sold during the period
Reduction to allowance for securities we intend to sell or more likely than not will be
required to sell
Write-offs charged against allowance
Recoveries of amounts previously written off
Ending balance of allowance for credit losses
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
—
388 $
$
—
—
(388)
—
—
—
—
—
$
— $
—
1,864
(1,476)
—
—
—
—
—
388
F- 79
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 9. Real Estate Securities - (continued)
Gains and losses from the sale of AFS securities are recorded as Realized gains, net, in our consolidated statements of income
(loss). The following table presents the gross realized gains and losses on sales and calls of AFS securities for the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 9.11 – Gross Realized Gains and Losses on AFS Securities
(In Thousands)
Gross realized gains - sales
Gross realized gains - calls
Gross realized losses - sales
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
1,540 $
8,779 $
15,553
—
5
(4,144)
17,582
6,239
—
Total Realized Gains on Sales and Calls of AFS Securities, net
$
17,093 $
4,640 $
23,821
Note 10. Other Investments
Other investments at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized in the following table.
Table 10.1 – Components of Other Investments
(In Thousands)
Servicer advance investments
HEIs
Strategic investments
Excess MSRs
Mortgage servicing rights
Other
Total Other Investments
Servicer advance investments
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
350,923 $
192,740
35,702
44,231
12,438
5,935
231,489
42,440
4,449
34,418
8,815
26,564
$
641,969 $
348,175
We and a third-party co-investor, through two partnerships (“SA Buyers”) consolidated by us, purchased the outstanding servicer
advances and excess MSRs related to portfolios of legacy residential mortgage-backed securitizations serviced by the co-investor (See
Note 4 for additional information regarding the transaction). During the year ended December 31, 2021, we funded additional
purchases of outstanding servicer advances and excess MSRs under the same partnership structure. At December 31, 2021, we had
funded $148 million of total capital to the SA Buyers (see Note 16 for additional detail).
Our servicer advance investments (owned by the consolidated SA Buyers) are comprised of outstanding servicer advance
receivables, the requirement to purchase all future servicer advances made with respect to specified pools of residential mortgage
loans, and a portion of the mortgage servicing fees from the underlying loan pools. A portion of the remaining mortgage servicing fees
from the underlying loan pools are paid directly to the third-party servicer for the performance of servicing duties and a portion is paid
to excess MSRs that we own as a separate investment.
F- 80
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 10. Other Investments - (continued)
Servicer advances are non-interest bearing and are a customary feature of residential mortgage securitization transactions.
Servicer advances are generally reimbursable cash payments made by a servicer when the borrower fails to make scheduled payments
due on a residential mortgage loan or to support the value of the collateral property. Servicer advances typically fall into three
categories:
•
•
•
Principal and Interest Advances: cash payments made by the servicer to cover scheduled principal and interest payments on a
residential mortgage loan that have not been paid on a timely basis by the borrower.
Escrow Advances (Taxes and Insurance Advances): Cash payments made by the servicer to third parties on behalf of the
borrower for real estate taxes and insurance premiums on the property that have not been paid on a timely basis by the
borrower.
Corporate Advances: Cash payments made by the servicer to third parties for the reimbursable costs and expenses incurred in
connection with the foreclosure, preservation and sale of the mortgaged property, including attorneys’ and other professional
fees.
Servicer advances are generally permitted to be repaid from amounts received with respect to the related residential mortgage
loan, including payments from the borrower or amounts received from the liquidation of the property securing the loan. Residential
mortgage servicing agreements generally require a servicer to make advances in respect of serviced residential mortgage loans unless
the servicer determines in good faith that the advance would not be ultimately recoverable from the proceeds of the related residential
mortgage loan or the mortgaged property.
At December 31, 2021, our servicer advance investments had a carrying value of $351 million and were associated with specified
pools of residential mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $13.63 billion. The outstanding servicer advance receivables
associated with this investment were $311 million at December 31, 2021, which were financed with short-term non-recourse
securitization debt (see Note 13 for additional detail on this debt). The servicer advance receivables were comprised of the following
types of advances at December 31, 2021 and 2020:
Table 10.2 – Components of Servicer Advance Receivables
(In Thousands)
Principal and interest advances
Escrow advances (taxes and insurance advances)
Corporate advances
Total Servicer Advance Receivables
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
94,148 $
172,847
43,958
310,953 $
110,923
79,279
27,454
217,656
We account for our servicer advance investments at fair value and during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, we
recorded $12 million, $11 million and $11 million, respectively, of Other interest income associated with these investments, and
recorded a net market valuation loss of $1 million, a net market valuation loss of $9 million and a net market valuation gain of $3
million, respectively, through Investment fair value changes, net in our consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 81
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 10. Other Investments - (continued)
HEIs
In 2019, we began purchasing home equity investment contracts from Point Digital under a flow purchase agreement. During the
third quarter of 2021, we amended this agreement and committed to purchase additional HEIs. At December 31, 2021, we had
acquired $78 million of HEIs cumulatively under this agreement. See Note 16 for additional detail on this commitment.
As of December 31, 2021, we owned $33 million of HEIs at Redwood and consolidated $160 million of HEIs through the Point
HEI securitization entity. We account for these investments under the fair value option and during the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020, we recorded a net market valuation gain of $13 million and a net market valuation loss of $2 million, respectively, related to
HEIs owned at Redwood through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
During the third quarter of 2021, in conjunction with co-sponsoring a securitization of HEIs, we purchased $122 million of
additional HEIs from other contributors to the securitization, then transferred $172 million of HEIs to the Point HEI securitization
entity which issued $146 million of ABS (See Note 4 for further discussion on the Point securitization entity and Note 14 for further
discussion on ABS issued). We retained subordinate certificates from the entity valued at $10 million as of December 31, 2021,
representing our economic interest in the entity. The other contributors to the securitization own subordinate certificates in the entity
that were valued at $17 million at December 31, 2021 and are carried on our balance sheet as non-controlling interests within the
Accrued expenses and other liabilities line item of our consolidated balance sheets.
We consolidate the Point HEI securitization entity in accordance with GAAP and have elected to account for it under the CFE
election. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded net market valuation gains of $0.2 million (including $1.4 million of
interest expense) related to our net investment in the Point HEI entity through Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
Strategic Investments
Strategic investments represent investments we have made in companies through our RWT Horizons venture investment strategy
and separately at a corporate level. At December 31, 2021, we had made 15 investments in companies through RWT Horizons with a
total carrying value of $21 million, and one corporate investment in Churchill Finance. See Note 3 for additional detail on how we
account for our strategic investments. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded $0.8 million of Other income from our
strategic investments.
Excess MSRs
In association with our servicer advance investments described above, we (through our consolidated SA Buyers) invested in
excess MSRs associated with the same specified pools of legacy residential mortgage loans. Additionally, we own excess MSRs
associated with specified pools of multifamily loans. We account for our excess MSRs at fair value and during the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 we recognized $13 million, $12 million and $8 million of Other interest income, respectively,
and recorded net market valuation losses of $8 million, $8 million, and $3 million respectively, through Investment fair value changes,
net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Mortgage Servicing Rights
We invest in mortgage servicing rights associated with residential mortgage loans and contract with licensed sub-servicers to
perform all servicing functions for these loans. The majority of our investments in MSRs were made through the retention of servicing
rights associated with the residential jumbo mortgage loans that we acquired and subsequently transferred to third parties.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, our MSRs had a fair value of $12 million and $9 million, respectively, and were associated with
loans with an aggregate principal balance of $2.12 billion and $2.59 billion, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020, and 2019, including net market valuation gains and losses on our MSRs and related risk management derivatives, we recorded a
net gain of $2 million, a net loss of $10 million, and a net gain of $4 million respectively, through Other income on our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
F- 82
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table presents the fair value and notional amount of our derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Table 11.1 – Fair Value and Notional Amount of Derivative Financial Instruments
(In Thousands)
Assets - Risk Management Derivatives
Interest rate swaps
TBAs
Interest rate futures
Swaptions
Assets - Other Derivatives
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Fair
Value
Notional
Amount
Fair
Value
Notional
Amount
$
611 $
161,500 $
224 $
42,000
2,880
25
2,440,000
9,000
18,260
3,520,000
—
—
18,318
1,660,000
19,727
1,585,000
Loan purchase and interest rate lock commitments
4,633
971,631
15,027
2,617,254
Total Assets
$
26,467 $
5,242,131 $
53,238 $
7,764,254
Liabilities - Risk Management Derivatives
Interest rate swaps
TBAs
Interest rate futures
Liabilities - Other Derivatives
Loan purchase commitments
Total Liabilities
Total Derivative Financial Instruments, Net
Risk Management Derivatives
(1,251)
(658)
(905)
283,100
870,000
62,500
—
—
(15,495)
3,105,000
—
—
(503)
404,190
(577)
477,153
$
$
(3,317) $
1,619,790 $
(16,072) $
3,582,153
23,150 $
6,861,921 $
37,166 $ 11,346,407
To manage, to varying degrees, risks associated with certain assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, we may
enter into derivative contracts. At December 31, 2021, we were party to swaps and swaptions with an aggregate notional amount of
$2.10 billion, futures with an aggregate notional amount of $72 million and TBA agreements with an aggregate notional amount of
$3.31 billion. At December 31, 2020, we were party to swaps and swaptions with an aggregate notional amount of $1.63 billion, and
TBA agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $6.63 billion.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, risk management derivatives had a net market valuation gain of $41
million, a net market valuation loss of $93 million, and a net market valuation loss of $134 million, respectively. These market
valuation gains and losses are recorded in Mortgage banking activities, net, Investment fair value changes, net and Other income on
our consolidated statements of income (loss).
Loan Purchase and Interest Rate Lock Commitments
LPCs and IRLCs that qualify as derivatives are recorded at their estimated fair values. For the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020, and 2019, LPCs and IRLCs had a net market valuation gain of $11 million, a net market valuation gain of $57 million, and a net
market valuation gain of $62 million, respectively, that were recorded in Mortgage banking activities, net on our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
F- 83
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments - (continued)
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
To manage the variability in interest expense related to portions of our long-term debt, we designated certain interest rate swaps as
cash flow hedges.
During the first quarter of 2020, we terminated and settled all of our outstanding derivatives that had been designated as cash
flow hedges for our trust preferred securities and subordinated debt, with a payment of $84 million. For interest rate agreements
previously designated as cash flow hedges, our total unrealized loss reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income was $76
million and $81 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We will amortize this loss into interest expense over the
remaining term of our trust preferred securities and subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2021, we expect to amortize $4 million of
realized losses related to terminated cash flow hedges into interest expense over the next twelve months.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, changes in the values of designated cash flow hedges were $0, negative
$33 million, and negative $17 million, respectively, and were recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of
equity.
The following table illustrates the impact on interest expense of our interest rate agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges for
the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 11.2 – Impact on Interest Expense of Interest Rate Agreements Accounted for as Cash Flow Hedges
(In Thousands)
Net interest expense on cash flows hedges
Realized net losses reclassified from other comprehensive income
Total Interest Expense
Derivative Counterparty Credit Risk
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
$
$
— $
(860) $
(2,847)
(4,127)
(3,188)
—
(4,127) $
(4,048) $
(2,847)
We incur credit risk to the extent that counterparties to our derivative financial instruments do not perform their obligations under
specified contractual agreements. If a derivative counterparty does not perform, we may not receive the proceeds to which we may be
entitled under these agreements. Each of our derivative counterparties that is not a clearinghouse must maintain compliance with
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements or other similar agreements (or receive a waiver of non-
compliance after a specific assessment) in order to conduct derivative transactions with us. Additionally, we review non-clearinghouse
derivative counterparty credit standings, and in the case of a deterioration of creditworthiness, appropriate remedial action is taken. To
further mitigate counterparty risk, we exit derivatives contracts with counterparties that (i) do not maintain compliance with (or obtain
a waiver from) the terms of their ISDA or other agreements with us; or (ii) do not meet internally established guidelines regarding
creditworthiness. Our ISDA and similar agreements currently require full bilateral collateralization of unrealized loss exposures with
our derivative counterparties. Through a margin posting process, our positions are revalued with counterparties each business day and
cash margin is generally transferred to either us or our derivative counterparties as collateral based upon the directional changes in fair
value of the positions. We also attempt to transact with several different counterparties in order to reduce our specific counterparty
exposure. With respect to certain of our derivatives, clearing and settlement is through one or more clearinghouses, which may be
substituted as a counterparty. Clearing and settlement of derivative transactions through a clearinghouse is also intended to reduce
specific counterparty exposure. We consider counterparty risk as part of our fair value assessments of all derivative financial
instruments at each quarter-end. At December 31, 2021, we assessed this risk as remote and did not record a specific valuation
adjustment.
At December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with our derivative counterparty ISDA agreements.
F- 84
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 12. Other Assets and Liabilities
Other assets at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized in the following table.
Table 12.1 – Components of Other Assets
(In Thousands)
Investment receivable
Accrued interest receivable
REO
Deferred tax asset
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Fixed assets and leasehold improvements (1)
Margin receivable
Pledged collateral
Other
Total Other Assets
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
82,781 $
47,515
36,126
20,867
18,772
9,019
7,269
—
8,768
$
231,117 $
43,176
39,445
8,413
871
15,012
4,203
4,758
1,177
13,533
130,588
(1) Fixed assets and leasehold improvements had a basis of $17 million and accumulated depreciation of $8 million at December 31, 2021.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized in the following table.
Table 12.2 – Components of Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
(In Thousands)
Accrued compensation
Payable to non-controlling interests
Accrued interest payable
Margin payable
Operating lease liabilities
Residential loan and MSR repurchase reserve
Guarantee obligations
Accrued operating expenses
Bridge loan holdbacks
Accrued income taxes payable
Deferred consideration
Other
Total Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Deferred Consideration
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
74,636 $
42,670
39,297
24,368
20,960
9,306
7,459
4,377
3,109
726
—
$
18,880
245,788 $
24,393
16,941
34,858
14,728
16,687
8,631
10,039
5,509
5,708
5,614
14,579
21,653
179,340
The deferred consideration presented in the table above is related to our acquisition of 5 Arches in 2019. During the first quarter
of 2021, we distributed 806,068 shares of Redwood common stock and paid $1 million in cash in full settlement of the remaining
deferred consideration associated with this acquisition.
F- 85
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 12. Other Assets and Liabilities - (continued)
Investment Receivable
Investment receivable primarily consists of amounts receivable from third-party servicers related to principal and interest
receivable from business purpose loans and fees receivable from servicer advance investments.
Margin Receivable and Payable
Margin receivable and payable resulted from margin calls between us and our counterparties under derivatives, master repurchase
agreements, and warehouse facilities, whereby we or the counterparty posted collateral. Through December 31, 2021, we had met all
margin calls due.
Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets and Operating Lease Liabilities
Operating lease liabilities are equal to the present value of our remaining lease payments discounted at our incremental borrowing
rate and the operating lease right-of-use assets are equal to the operating lease liabilities adjusted for our deferred rent liabilities. These
balances are reduced as lease payments are made. See Note 16 for additional information on leases.
REO
The following table summarizes the activity and carrying values of REO assets held at Redwood and at consolidated Legacy
Sequoia, Freddie Mac SLST, and CAFL entities during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 12.3 – REO Activity
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Transfers to REO
Liquidations (1)
Changes in fair value, net
Balance at End of Period
Bridge
$
4,600 $
15,424
(7,515)
559
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Freddie Mac
SLST
Legacy
Sequoia
SFR at
CAFL
638 $
217
646 $
2,529 $
3,268
21,129
Total
8,413
40,038
(956)
(2,137)
(2,034)
(12,642)
162
251
(655)
317
$
13,068 $
61 $
2,028 $
20,969 $
36,126
(In Thousands)
Bridge
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Freddie Mac
SLST
Legacy
Sequoia
SFR at
CAFL
Balance at beginning of period
$
6,887 $
460 $
445 $
1,670 $
Transfers to REO
Liquidations (1)
Changes in fair value, net
Balance at End of Period
6,111
(8,830)
432
532
(243)
(111)
1,319
6,157
(1,178)
(4,371)
(14,622)
60
(927)
$
4,600 $
638 $
646 $
2,529 $
Total
9,462
14,119
(546)
8,413
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, REO liquidations resulted in $0.3 million and $1 million of realized losses, respectively,
which were recorded in Investment fair value changes, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 86
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 12. Other Assets and Liabilities - (continued)
The following table provides the detail of REO assets at Redwood and at consolidated Legacy Sequoia, Freddie Mac SLST, and
CAFL entities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 12.4 – REO Assets
Number of REO assets
At December 31, 2021
At December 31, 2020
Legal and Repurchase Reserves
Redwood
Bridge
Legacy
Sequoia
Freddie Mac
SLST
SFR at
CAFL
Total
5
3
2
3
24
9
3
2
34
17
See Note 16 for additional information on the legal and residential repurchase reserves.
Payable to Non-Controlling Interests
In 2018, Redwood and a third-party co-investor, through two partnership entities consolidated by Redwood, purchased servicer
advances and excess MSRs related to a portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced by the co-investor (see Note 4 and Note 10 for
additional information on the partnership entities and associated investments). We account for the co-investor’s interests in the entities
as liabilities and at December 31, 2021, the carrying value of their interests was $26 million, representing their current economic
interest in the entities. Earnings from the partnership entities are allocated to the co-investors on a proportional basis and during the
years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 we allocated $2 million of income, $0.2 million of losses, and $1 million of gains,
respectively, to the co-investors, which were recorded in Other expenses on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
During the third quarter of 2021, Redwood and a third-party investor co-sponsored the transfer and securitization of HEIs through
the Point HEI securitization entity. We account for the co-investor’s interest in the Point HEI securitization entity as a liability and at
December 31, 2021, the carrying value of their interests was $17 million, representing their current economic interest in the Point HEI
entity. See Note 10 for a further discussion of the Point HEI securitization.
F- 87
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 13. Short-Term Debt
We enter into repurchase agreements ("repo"), loan warehouse agreements, and other forms of collateralized (and generally
uncommitted) short-term borrowings with several banks and major investment banking firms. At December 31, 2021, we had
outstanding agreements with several counterparties and we were in compliance with all of the related covenants.
The table below summarizes our short-term debt, including the facilities that are available to us, the outstanding balances, the
weighted average interest rate, and the maturity information at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 13.1 – Short-Term Debt
(Dollars in Thousands)
Facilities
Residential loan warehouse (1)
Business purpose loan warehouse
Real estate securities repo
Total Short-Term Debt Facilities
Servicer advance financing
Total Short-Term Debt
(Dollars in Thousands)
Facilities
Residential loan warehouse
Business purpose loan warehouse (2)
Real estate securities repo
Total Short-Term Debt Facilities
Servicer advance financing
Total Short-Term Debt
December 31, 2021
Number of
Facilities
Outstanding
Balance
Limit
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
Maturity
Weighted
Average
Days Until
Maturity
7 $ 1,669,344 $ 2,900,000
1.87 % 1/2022-12/2022
138,746
350,000
74,825
1,882,915
—
3.34 %
1.13 %
3/2022-7/2022
1/2022-3/2022
2
4
13
1
294,447
350,000
1.90 %
11/2022
306
$ 2,177,362
December 31, 2020
Number of
Facilities
Outstanding
Balance
Limit
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
Maturity
Weighted
Average
Days Until
Maturity
4 $
137,269 $ 1,300,000
2.45 % 1/2021-11/2021
500,000
—
3.37 %
2.24 %
5/2022-6/2022
1/2021-3/2021
2
3
9
1
99,190
77,775
314,234
208,375
$
522,609
335,000
1.95 %
11/2021
334
153
105
33
268
521
36
(1) Borrowings under our facilities are generally uncommitted and charged interest based on a specified margin over the 1- or 3-month LIBOR, or
1-month SOFR.
(2) Due to the revolving nature of the borrowings under these facilities, we have classified certain these facilities as short-term debt at December 31,
2021 and 2020. Borrowings under these facilities will be repaid as the underlying loans mature or are sold to third parties or transferred to
securitizations.
F- 88
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 13. Short-Term Debt - (continued)
The following table below presents the value of loans and securities pledged as collateral under our short-term debt facilities at
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 13.2 – Collateral for Short-Term Debt
(In Thousands)
Collateral Type
Held-for-sale residential loans
Business purpose loans
Real estate securities
On balance sheet
Sequoia securitizations (1)
Freddie Mac K-Series securitizations (1)
Total real estate securities owned
Other assets
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
1,838,797 $
167,687
5,823
61,525
31,657
99,005
1,962
156,355
127,029
23,193
63,105
28,255
114,553
315
398,252
9,978
23,220
217,656
250,854
649,106
Total Collateral for Short-Term Debt Facilities
$
2,107,451 $
Cash
Restricted cash
Servicer advances
Total Collateral for Servicer Advance Financing
Total Collateral for Short-Term Debt
6,480
25,420
310,953
342,853
$
2,450,304 $
(1) Represents securities we have retained from consolidated securitization entities. For GAAP purposes, we consolidate the loans and non-recourse
ABS debt issued from these securitizations.
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the average balances of our short-term debt facilities were $1.67 billion and
$1.19 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, accrued interest payable on our short-term debt facilities was $2 million
and $1 million, respectively.
Servicer advance financing consists of non-recourse short-term securitization debt used to finance servicer advance investments.
We consolidate the securitization entity that issued the debt, but the entity is independent of Redwood and the assets and liabilities are
not owned by and are not legal obligations of Redwood. At December 31, 2021, the accrued interest payable balance on this financing
was $0.2 million and the unamortized capitalized commitment costs were $1 million.
We also maintain a $10 million committed line of credit with a financial institution that is secured by certain mortgage-backed
securities with a fair market value of $1 million at December 31, 2021. At both December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had no outstanding
borrowings on this facility.
F- 89
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 13. Short-Term Debt - (continued)
Remaining Maturities of Short-Term Debt
The following table presents the remaining maturities of our secured short-term debt by the type of collateral securing the debt as
well as our convertible notes at December 31, 2021.
Table 13.3 – Short-Term Debt by Collateral Type and Remaining Maturities
(In Thousands)
Collateral Type
December 31, 2021
Within 30 days
31 to 90 days
Over 90 days
Total
Held-for-sale residential loans
$
101,885 $
1,022,271 $
545,188 $
1,669,344
Business purpose loans
Real estate securities
Total Secured Short-Term Debt
Servicer advance financing
Total Short-Term Debt
Note 14. Asset-Backed Securities Issued
—
43,833
145,718
—
103,925
30,992
1,157,188
—
34,821
—
580,009
294,447
138,746
74,825
1,882,915
294,447
$
145,718 $
1,157,188 $
874,456 $
2,177,362
ABS issued represents securities issued by non-recourse securitization entities we consolidate under GAAP. The majority of our
ABS issued is carried at fair value under the CFE election (see Note 4 for additional detail) with the remainder carried at amortized
cost. The carrying values of ABS issued by our consolidated securitization entities at December 31, 2021 and 2020 along with other
selected information, are summarized in the following table.
Table 14.1 – Asset-Backed Securities Issued
(Dollars in Thousands)
Certificates with principal
balance
Interest-only certificates
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
CAFL (1)
Freddie Mac
SLST (2)
Freddie Mac
K-Series
Point HEI
Total
December 31, 2021
$ 259,505 $ 3,353,073 $ 3,264,766 $ 1,535,638 $ 418,700
10,184
193,725
32,749
11,714
619
$ 138,792
—
$ 8,970,474
248,991
Market valuation adjustments
(32,243)
(2,774)
16,407
41,111
12,973
(1,382)
34,092
ABS Issued, Net
$ 227,881 $ 3,383,048 $ 3,474,898 $ 1,588,463 $ 441,857
$ 137,410
$ 9,253,557
Range of weighted average
interest rates, by series(3)
Stated maturities(3)
Number of series
0.23% to
1.44%
2.4% to
5.03%
2.64% to
5.24%
3.50% to
4.75%
2024 - 2036
2047-2052
2027-2031
2028-2059
20
16
16
3
3.41 %
3.31 %
2025
1
2052
1
F- 90
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 14. Asset-Backed Securities Issued - (continued)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Certificates with principal
balance
Interest-only certificates
Market valuation
adjustments
ABS Issued, Net
Range of weighted average
interest rates, by series
Stated maturities
Number of series
Legacy
Sequoia
Sequoia
CAFL (1)
December 31, 2020
Freddie
Mac SLST
(2)
Freddie
Mac K-
Series
Point HEI
Total
$ 329,039 $ 1,309,957 $ 2,716,425 $ 1,866,145 $
416,339 $
— $ 6,637,905
1,092
4,591
162,934
23,335
13,026
(47,805)
32,809
133,734
104,439
34,601
$ 282,326 $ 1,347,357 $ 3,013,093 $ 1,993,919 $
0.35% to
1.55%
2.25% to
5.04%
2.68% to
5.42%
3.50% to
4.75%
2024 - 2036
2047 - 2050
2021 - 2031 2028 - 2059
20
10
14
3
463,966 $
3.39% to
3.39%
2025
1
—
—
204,978
257,778
— $ 7,100,661
—
—
—
(1)
(2)
Includes $270 million (principal balance) of ABS issued by a CAFL bridge securitization trust sponsored by Redwood and accounted for at
amortized cost at December 31, 2021.
Includes $145 million and $205 million (principal balance) of ABS issued by a re-securitization trust sponsored by Redwood and accounted for
at amortized cost at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
(3) Certain ABS issued by CAFL, Freddie Mac SLST, and Point HEI entities are subject to early redemption and interest rate step-ups as described
below.
During the third quarter of 2021, we consolidated the assets and liabilities of a securitization entity formed in connection with the
securitization of CoreVest bridge loans (presented within CAFL in Table 14.1 above), which we determined was a VIE and for which
we determined we are the primary beneficiary. At issuance, we sold $270 million (principal balance) of ABS issued to third parties
and retained the remaining beneficial ownership interest in the trust. The ABS were issued at a discount and we have elected to
account for the ABS issued at amortized cost. At December 31, 2021, the principal balance of the ABS issued was $270 million, and
the debt discount and deferred issuance costs were $3 million, for a net carrying value of $267 million. The weighted average stated
coupon of the ABS issued was 2.34% at issuance. The ABS issued by the CAFL bridge entity are subject to an optional redemption in
March 2024, and beginning in March 2025 the interest rate on the ABS issued increases by 2% through final maturity in March 2029.
The ABS issued by this securitization were backed by assets including $278 million of bridge loans, $13 million of other assets and
$15 million of restricted cash at December 31, 2021. The securitization is structured with $300 million of total funding capacity and a
feature to allow reinvestment of loan payoffs for the first 30 months of the transaction (through March 2024).
During the third quarter of 2021, we consolidated the assets and liabilities of the Point HEI entity formed in connection with the
securitization of HEIs, which we determined was a VIE and for which we determined we are the primary beneficiary. At issuance, we
sold $146 million (principal balance) of ABS issued to third parties and retained a portion of the remaining beneficial ownership
interest in the trust. We elected to account for the entity under the CFE election and account for the ABS issued at fair value, with the
entire change in fair value of the ABS issued (including accrued interest) recorded through Investment fair value changes, net on our
consolidated statements of income (loss). The ABS issued by the Point HEI entity are subject to an optional redemption in September
2023, and beginning in September 2024 the interest rate on the ABS issued increases by 2% through final maturity in 2052.
During the third quarter of 2020, we transferred all of the subordinate securities we owned from two consolidated re-performing
loan securitization VIEs sponsored by Freddie Mac SLST to a re-securitization trust, which we determined was a VIE and for which
we determined we are the primary beneficiary. At issuance, we sold $210 million (principal balance) of ABS issued to third parties
and retained 100% of the remaining beneficial ownership interest in the trust through ownership of a subordinate security issued by the
trust. The ABS was issued at a discount and we have elected to account for the ABS issued at amortized cost. At December 31, 2021,
the carrying value of the ABS issued was $143 million and the debt discount was $2 million. The stated coupon of the ABS issued was
4.75% at issuance and the final stated maturity occurs in July 2059. The ABS issued is subject to optional redemption in July 2022 and
in July 2023, the ABS interest rate steps up to 7.75%.
F- 91
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 14. Asset-Backed Securities Issued - (continued)
The actual maturity of each class of ABS issued is primarily determined by the rate of principal prepayments on the assets of the
issuing entity. Each series is also subject to redemption prior to the stated maturity according to the terms of the respective governing
documents of each ABS issuing entity. As a result, the actual maturity of ABS issued may occur earlier than its stated maturity. At
December 31, 2021, the majority of the ABS issued and outstanding had contractual maturities beyond five years. See Note 4 for detail
on the carrying value components of the collateral for ABS issued and outstanding. The following table summarizes the accrued
interest payable on ABS issued at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Interest due on consolidated ABS issued is payable monthly.
Table 14.2 – Accrued Interest Payable on Asset-Backed Securities Issued
(In Thousands)
Legacy Sequoia
Sequoia
Freddie Mac SLST (1)
Freddie Mac K-Series
CAFL
Total Accrued Interest Payable on ABS Issued
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
99 $
8,452
4,630
1,190
11,030
25,401 $
141
4,697
5,656
1,177
10,122
21,793
(1)
Includes accrued interest payable on ABS issued by a re-securitization trust sponsored by Redwood.
F- 92
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 15. Long-Term Debt
The table below summarizes our long-term debt, including the facilities that are available to us, the outstanding balances, the
weighted average interest rate, and the maturity information at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 15.1 – Long-Term Debt
December 31, 2021
Unamortized
Deferred
Issuance
Costs /
Discount
Net
Carrying
Value
Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
Final
Maturity
Limit
(Dollars in Thousands)
Borrowings
Facilities
Recourse Subordinate Securities Financing
Facility A
CAFL
Facility B
Facility G
Non-Recourse BPL Financing
Facility H
Recourse BPL Financing
Facility F
Facility I
Total Long-Term Debt Facilities
Convertible notes
4.75% convertible senior notes
5.625% convertible senior notes
5.75% exchangeable senior notes
$
144,385 $
(313) $ 144,072
102,351
91,707
(353)
(376)
101,998
91,331
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.21 %
9/2024
4.21 %
4.75 %
2/2025
6/2026
307,215
(507)
306,708
400,000
L + 2.75%
N/A
(123)
234,226
—
110,148
450,000
450,000
L + 2.21%
L + 3.35%
9/2023
6/2023
234,349
110,148
990,155
198,629
150,200
172,092
(1,672)
988,483
(1,836)
196,793
(2,072)
148,128
(3,384)
168,708
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.75 %
5.625 %
5.75 %
8/2023
7/2024
10/2025
L + 2.25%
7/2037
Trust preferred securities and subordinated
notes
139,500
(779)
138,721
Total Long-Term Debt
$ 1,650,576 $
(9,743) $ 1,640,833
F- 93
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 15. Long-Term Debt - (continued)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Borrowings
December 31, 2020
Unamortized
Deferred
Issuance
Costs /
Discount
Net
Carrying
Value
Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
Final
Maturity
Limit
Facilities
Recourse Subordinate Securities
Financing
Facility A
Facility B
Non-Recourse BPL Financing
Facility C
Facility D
Recourse BPL Financing
Facility E
Facility F
Total Long-Term Debt Facilities
FHLBC borrowings
Convertible notes
4.75% convertible senior notes
5.625% convertible senior notes
5.75% exchangeable senior notes
Trust preferred securities and
subordinated notes
$
178,167 $
(729) $
177,438
102,856
(656)
102,200
N/A
N/A
4.21 %
4.21 %
(2,452)
(666)
249,269
114,415
372,248
185,240
(488)
(193)
51,462
79,942
350,000
250,000
(5,184)
774,726
L + 7.50%
L + 3.85%
L + 3.00%
L + 3.00%
—
1,000
1,000
0.30 %
1/2026
9/2024
2/2025
6/2022
7/2022
5/2022
9/2023
(2,862)
(2,815)
(4,159)
195,767
147,385
167,933
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.75 %
5.625 %
8/2023
7/2024
5.75 %
10/2025
L + 2.25%
7/2037
139,500
(826)
138,674
251,721
115,081
51,950
80,135
779,910
1,000
198,629
150,200
172,092
Total Long-Term Debt
$ 1,441,331 $
(15,846) $ 1,425,485
(1) Variable rate borrowings are based on 1- or 3-month LIBOR ("L" in the table above) plus an applicable spread.
F- 94
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 15. Long-Term Debt - (continued)
The following table summarizes the value of loans and securities pledged as collateral under our long-term debt facilities at
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 15.2 – Long-Term Debt
(In Thousands)
Collateral Type
Bridge loans
Single-family rental loans
Real estate securities
Sequoia securitizations (1)
CAFL securitizations (1)
Total real estate securities owned
Other BPL investments
Restricted cash
Total Collateral for Long-Term Debt
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
554,597 $
244,703
247,227
260,405
507,632
—
—
544,151
154,774
249,446
114,044
363,490
21,414
1,100
$
1,306,932 $
1,084,929
(1) Represents securities we have retained from consolidated securitization entities. For GAAP purposes, we consolidate the loans and non-recourse
ABS debt issued from these securitizations.
The following table summarizes the accrued interest payable on long-term debt at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 15.3 – Accrued Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt
(In Thousands)
Long-term debt facilities
Convertible notes
4.75% convertible senior notes
5.625% convertible senior notes
5.75% exchangeable senior notes
Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes
Total Accrued Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt
Recourse Subordinate Securities Financing Facilities
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
$
$
815 $
3,564
3,896
2,474
581
11,330 $
1,799
3,564
3,896
2,474
669
12,402
In 2019, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable (i.e., not subject to margin calls
based on the market value of the underlying collateral) recourse debt financing of certain Sequoia securities as well as securities
retained from our consolidated Sequoia securitizations (Facility A in Table 15.1 above). The financing is fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by Redwood, with an interest rate of approximately 4.21% through September 2022. The financing facility may be
terminated, at our option, in September 2022, and has a final maturity in September 2024, provided that the interest rate on amounts
outstanding under the facility increases between October 2022 and September 2024.
In the first quarter of 2020, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a second repurchase agreement with similar terms to the facility
above to provide non-marginable recourse debt financing of certain securities retained from our consolidated CAFL securitizations
(Facility B in Table 15.1 above). The financing is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Redwood, with an interest rate of
approximately 4.21% through February 2023. The financing facility may be terminated, at our option, in February 2023, and has a
final maturity in February 2025, provided that the interest rate on amounts outstanding under the facility increases between March
2023 and February 2025.
F- 95
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 15. Long-Term Debt - (continued)
In the third quarter of 2021, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable recourse
debt financing of certain securities retained from our consolidated CAFL securitizations (Facility G in Table 15.1 above). The
financing is guaranteed by Redwood, with an interest rate of approximately 4.75% through June 2024. The financing facility may be
terminated, at our option, in June 2023, and has a final maturity in June 2026, provided that the interest rate on amounts outstanding
under the facility increases between June 2024 and June 2026.
Non-Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
In the second quarter of 2021, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable, non-
recourse financing primarily for business purpose bridge loans (Facility H in Table 15.1 above). Borrowings under this facility accrue
interest at a per annum rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.75%. This facility does not have a specified maturity date, but may be
subject to repayment within a year upon notification by the lender.
In the third quarter of 2020, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable, non-
recourse financing primarily for business purpose bridge loans (Facility D in the December 31, 2020 Table 15.1 above). Borrowings
under this facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.85% (with a 0.50% LIBOR floor), through
July 2022. We do not have the ability to increase borrowings under this borrowing facility above the existing amounts outstanding. In
the third quarter of 2021, we reclassified this facility from long-term to short-term debt as the maturity on this facility became due
within a year.
In the second quarter of 2020, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable, non-
recourse financing primarily for business purpose bridge loans (Facility C in Table 15.1 above). Borrowings under this facility accrue
interest at a per annum rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 7.50% (with a 1.50% LIBOR floor), through June 2022 (facility is fully
callable in June 2021). The revolving period ends in June 2021, and amounts borrowed under the term and revolving facilities are due
in full in June 2022. We repaid this facility in full during the second quarter of 2021.
Recourse Business Purpose Loan Financing Facilities
In the second quarter of 2021, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable financing
for business purpose bridge loans and single-family rental loans (Facility I in Table 15.1 above). At December 31, 2021, borrowings
under this facility accrue interest at a weighted average per annum rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 3.35% through June 2023
and are recourse to Redwood. At December 31, 2021 this facility has an aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $450 million.
In the third quarter of 2020, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable financing for
business purpose bridge loans and single-family rental loans (Facility F in Table 15.1 above). At December 31, 2021, borrowings
under this facility accrue interest at a weighted average per annum rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.21% through September
2023 and are recourse to Redwood. At December 31, 2021 this facility has an aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $450
million.
In the second quarter of 2020, a subsidiary of Redwood entered into a repurchase agreement providing non-marginable financing
for business purpose bridge loans and single-family rental loans (Facility E in Table 15.1 above). Borrowings under this facility accrue
interest at a per annum rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.75% through March 2022 and are recourse to Redwood. This facility
has an aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $350 million. In the second quarter of 2021, we reclassified this facility from long-
term to short-term debt as the maturity on this facility became due within a year.
F- 96
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 15. Long-Term Debt - (continued)
Convertible Notes
In September 2019, RWT Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., issued $201 million principal
amount of 5.75% exchangeable senior notes due 2025. After deducting the underwriting discount and offering costs, we received
$195 million of net proceeds. Including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs, the weighted average interest expense yield on
these exchangeable notes is approximately 6.3% per annum. At December 31, 2021, these notes were exchangeable at the option of
the holder at an exchange rate of 55.2644 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of exchangeable senior notes (equivalent to an
exchange price of $18.09 per common share). Upon exchange of these notes by a holder, the holder will receive shares of our common
stock. During the second quarter of 2020, we repurchased $29 million par value of these notes at a discount and recorded a gain on
extinguishment of $6 million in Realized gains, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
In June 2018, we issued $200 million principal amount of 5.625% convertible senior notes due 2024 at an issuance price of
99.5%. These convertible notes require semi-annual interest payments at a fixed coupon rate of 5.625% until maturity or conversion,
which will be no later than July 15, 2024. After deducting the issuance discount, the underwriting discount and offering costs, we
received $194 million of net proceeds. Including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and the debt discount, the weighted
average interest expense yield on these convertible notes is approximately 6.2% per annum. These notes are convertible at the option
of the holder at a conversion rate of 54.8317 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of convertible senior notes (equivalent to a
conversion price of $18.24 per common share). Upon conversion of these notes by a holder, the holder will receive shares of our
common stock. During the second quarter of 2020, we repurchased $50 million par value of these notes at a discount and recorded a
gain on extinguishment of $9 million in Realized gains, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
In August 2017, we issued $245 million principal amount of 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2023. After deducting the
underwriting discount and offering costs, we received $238 million of net proceeds. Including amortization of deferred debt issuance
costs, the weighted average interest expense yield on these convertible notes is approximately 5.3% per annum. At December 31,
2021, these notes were convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 54.4764 common shares per $1,000 principal
amount of convertible senior notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $18.36 per common share). Upon conversion of these notes by
a holder, the holder will receive shares of our common stock. During the second quarter of 2020, we repurchased $46 million par
value of these notes at a discount and recorded a gain on extinguishment of $10 million in Realized gains, net on our consolidated
statements of income (loss).
Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Notes
At December 31, 2021, we had trust preferred securities and subordinated notes outstanding of $100 million and $40 million,
respectively. This debt requires quarterly interest payments at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.25% until the notes
are redeemed. The $100 million trust preferred securities will be redeemed no later than January 30, 2037, and the $40 million
subordinated notes will be redeemed no later than July 30, 2037.
Under the terms of this debt, we covenant, among other things, to use our best efforts to continue to qualify as a REIT. If an event
of default were to occur in respect of this debt, we would generally be restricted under its terms (subject to certain exceptions) from
making dividend distributions to stockholders, from repurchasing common stock or repurchasing or redeeming any other then-
outstanding equity securities, and from making any other payments in respect of any equity interests in us or in respect of any then-
outstanding debt that is pari passu or subordinate to this debt.
F- 97
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
At December 31, 2021, we were obligated under seven non-cancelable operating leases with expiration dates through 2031 for
$24 million of cumulative lease payments. Our operating lease expense was $4 million, $4 million, and $3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The following table presents our future lease commitments at December 31, 2021.
Table 16.1 – Future Lease Commitments by Year
(In Thousands)
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027 and thereafter
Total Lease Commitments
Less: Imputed interest
Operating Lease Liabilities
December 31, 2021
$
$
4,163
4,428
4,338
3,552
3,420
4,553
24,454
(3,494)
20,960
Leasehold improvements for our offices are amortized into expense over the lease term. There were $3 million of unamortized
leasehold improvements at December 31, 2021. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, we recognized $0.5 million,
$0.5 million, and $0.4 million of leasehold amortization expense, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we leased additional office space and extended the lease term at two of our office
locations and determined that each of these lease amendments qualified as operating leases. At December 31, 2021, our operating
lease liabilities were $21 million, which were a component of Accrued expenses and other liabilities, and our operating lease right-of-
use assets were $19 million, which were a component of Other assets.
We determined that none of our leases contained an implicit interest rate and used a discount rate equal to our incremental
borrowing rate on a collateralized basis to determine the present value of our total lease payments. As such, we determined the
applicable discount rate for each of our leases using a swap rate plus an applicable spread for borrowing arrangements secured by our
real estate loans and securities for a length of time equal to the remaining lease term on the date of adoption. At December 31, 2021,
the weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount rate for our leases was 6 years and 5.1%, respectively.
Commitment to Fund Bridge Loans
As of December 31, 2021, we had commitments to fund up to $625 million of additional advances on existing bridge loans. These
commitments are generally subject to loan agreements with covenants regarding the financial performance of the borrower and other
terms regarding advances that must be met before we fund the commitment. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, we carried a $1 million
and $2 million contingent liability related to these commitments to fund construction advances, respectively. During the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded a net market valuation gain of $1 million and a net market valuation loss of $2 million,
respectively, related to this liability through Mortgage banking activities, net on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
F- 98
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies - (continued)
Commitment to Fund Partnerships
In 2018, we invested in two partnerships created to acquire and manage certain mortgage servicing related assets (see Note 10 for
additional detail). In connection with this investment, we are required to fund future net servicer advances related to the underlying
mortgage loans. The actual amount of net servicer advances we may fund in the future is subject to significant uncertainty and will be
based on the credit and prepayment performance of the underlying loans.
Commitment to Acquire HEIs
In the third quarter of 2021, we amended an existing flow purchase agreement with Point Digital to acquire HEIs that Point
Digital originates with homeowners. Each HEI provides the owner of such HEI the right to purchase a percentage ownership interest
in an associated residential property, and the homeowner's obligations under the HEI are secured by a lien (primarily second liens) on
the property created by a deed of trust or a mortgage. Our investments in HEIs allow us to share in both home price appreciation and
depreciation of the associated property. At December 31, 2021, we had an outstanding remaining commitment to fund up to
$94 million under this agreement.
Loss Contingencies — Risk-Sharing
During 2015 and 2016, we sold conforming loans to the Agencies with an original unpaid principal balance of $3.19 billion,
subject to our risk-sharing arrangements with the Agencies. At December 31, 2021, the maximum potential amount of future payments
we could be required to make under these arrangements was $44 million and this amount was fully collateralized by assets we
transferred to pledged accounts and is presented as pledged collateral in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. We have no
recourse to any third parties that would allow us to recover any amounts related to our obligations under the arrangements. At
December 31, 2021, we had not incurred any losses under these arrangements. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and
2019, other income related to these arrangements was $3 million, $4 million and $4 million, respectively, and was included in Other
income on our consolidated statements of income (loss). For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, we recorded net
market valuation losses related to these arrangements of $0.1 million, $1 million, and $0.2 million, respectively, through Investment
fair value changes, net, on our consolidated statements of income (loss).
All of the loans in the reference pools subject to these risk-sharing arrangements were originated in 2014 and 2015, and at
December 31, 2021, the loans had an unpaid principal balance of $552 million and a weighted average FICO score of 756 (at
origination) and LTV ratio of 74% (at origination). At December 31, 2021, $18 million of the loans were 90 days or more delinquent,
of which one of these loans with an unpaid principal balance of $0.2 million was in foreclosure. At December 31, 2021, the carrying
value of our guarantee obligation was $7 million and included $5 million designated as a non-amortizing credit reserve, which we
believe is sufficient to cover current expected losses under these obligations.
Our consolidated balance sheets include assets of special purpose entities ("SPEs") associated with these risk-sharing
arrangements (i.e., the "pledged collateral" referred to above) that can only be used to settle obligations of these SPEs for which the
creditors of these SPEs (the Agencies) do not have recourse to us. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, assets of such SPEs totaled $34
million and $46 million, respectively, and liabilities of such SPEs totaled $7 million and $10 million, respectively.
Loss Contingencies — Residential Repurchase Reserve
We maintain a repurchase reserve for potential obligations arising from representation and warranty violations related to
residential loans we have sold to securitization trusts or third parties and for conforming residential loans associated with MSRs that
we have purchased from third parties. We do not originate residential loans and we believe the initial risk of loss due to loan
repurchases (i.e., due to a breach of representations and warranties) would generally be a contingency to the companies from whom
we acquired the loans. However, in some cases, for example, where loans were acquired from companies that have since become
insolvent, repurchase claims may result in our being liable for a repurchase obligation. Additionally, for certain loans we sold during
the second quarter of 2020 that were previously held for investment, we have a direct obligation to repurchase these loans in the event
of any early payment defaults (or EPDs) by the underlying mortgage borrowers within certain specified periods following the sales.
F- 99
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies - (continued)
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, our repurchase reserve associated with our residential loans and MSRs was $9 million and $9
million, respectively, and was recorded in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We received 4
and 10 repurchase requests during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. During the years ended December 31,
2021, 2020, and 2019, we repurchased two loans, one loan, and zero loans, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020, and 2019, we recorded repurchase provisions of $1 million and $4 million and reversals of repurchase provisions of $0.1
million, respectively, that were recorded in Mortgage banking activities, net and Other income on our consolidated statements of
income (loss) and had charge-offs of $0.2 million, $0.1 million, and zero, respectively.
Loss Contingencies — Litigation, Claims and Demands
There is no significant update regarding the FHLB-Seattle or Schwab litigation matters referenced in Note 16 within the financial
statements included in Redwood’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 under the heading "Loss
Contingencies - Litigation." At December 31, 2021, the aggregate amount of loss contingency reserves established in respect of the
FHLB-Seattle and Schwab litigation matters referenced in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020
was $2 million.
From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, we may submit or receive demand letters to or from counterparties
relating to breaches of representations and warranties, be named in lawsuits brought by mortgage borrowers relating to foreclosure
proceedings initiated by the servicers of the related mortgage loans or seeking to establish that their mortgage notes and/or mortgages
are unenforceable as a matter of law due to defects in the transfer and assignment of those notes and mortgages, or be named in
lawsuits brought by mortgage borrowers seeking remedies against the originator of the mortgage for fraud or defects in the originator's
origination process, including defects in the disclosure of mortgage terms at the time of origination (in these cases we may be named
in connection with the origination of the loan, in the case of business purpose loans we originate, or on a theory of assignee liability in
the case of residential loans we acquire). Additionally, following our acquisitions of the 5 Arches and CoreVest business purpose loan
origination platforms, there are litigation matters that relate to these two platforms that represent a level of litigation activity that we
believe is generally consistent with the ordinary course of business of a loan originator, which has not been associated with Redwood
historically.
In addition to those matters, as previously disclosed, in connection with the impact of the effects of the pandemic on the non-
Agency mortgage finance market and on our business and operations, a number of the counterparties that have regularly sold
residential mortgage loans to us believe that we breached perceived obligations to them, and requested or demanded that we purchase
loans from them and/or compensate them for perceived damages resulting from our decisions in early 2020 not to purchase certain
loans from them (“Residential Loan Seller Demands”). With respect to specific lawsuits or claims arising out of or relating to
Residential Seller Demands, there is no significant update regarding the matter(s) described in Note 16 within the financial statements
included in Redwood's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31. 2020 under the heading "Loss Contingencies -
Litigation, Claims and Demands".
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded $10 million of expenses in association with Residential Loan Seller
Demands. At December 31, 2021, the aggregate amount of our accrual for estimated costs associated with Residential Loan Seller
Demands was $0.5 million, a portion of which is contingent on the successful completion of future residential loan purchase and sale
transactions with certain counterparties. We believe we have either resolved or adequately accrued for any unresolved Residential
Loan Seller Demands and that there are no other Residential Loan Seller Demands that are reasonably possible to result in a material
loss. Our actual losses, and any accruals or reserves we may establish in the future relating to these matters, may be materially higher
than the accruals and reserves we have noted above, including in the event that any of these matters proceed to trial and result in a
judgment against us. We cannot be certain that any of these matters that are not already formally resolved will be resolved through a
resolution or settlement and we cannot be certain that the resolution of these matters, whether through litigation, settlement, or
otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations in any future period.
In accordance with GAAP, we review the need for any loss contingency reserves and establish reserves when, in the opinion of
management, it is probable that a matter would result in a liability and the amount of loss, if any, can be reasonably estimated.
Additionally, we record receivables for insurance recoveries relating to litigation-related losses and expenses if and when such
amounts are covered by insurance and recovery of such losses or expenses are due. We review our litigation matters each quarter to
F- 100
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies - (continued)
assess these loss contingency reserves and make adjustments in these reserves, upwards or downwards, as appropriate, in accordance
with GAAP based on our review.
In the ordinary course of any litigation matter, including certain of the above-referenced matters, we have engaged and may
continue to engage in formal or informal settlement communications with the plaintiffs or co-defendants. Settlement communications
we have engaged in relating to certain of the above-referenced litigation matters are one of the factors that have resulted in our
determination to establish the loss contingency reserves described above. We cannot be certain that any of these matters will be
resolved through a settlement prior to litigation and we cannot be certain that the resolution of these matters, whether through trial,
settlement, or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations in any future period.
Future developments (including resolution of substantive pre-trial motions relating to these matters, receipt of additional
information and documents relating to these matters (such as through pre-trial discovery), new or additional settlement
communications with plaintiffs relating to these matters, or resolutions of similar claims against other defendants in these matters)
could result in our concluding in the future to establish additional loss contingency reserves or to disclose an estimate of reasonably
possible losses in excess of our established reserves with respect to these matters. Our actual losses with respect to the above
referenced litigation matters may be materially higher than the aggregate amount of loss contingency reserves we have established in
respect of these litigation matters, including in the event that any of these matters proceeds to trial and the plaintiff prevails. Other
factors that could result in our concluding to establish additional loss contingency reserves or estimate additional reasonably possible
losses, or could result in our actual losses with respect to the above-referenced litigation matters being materially higher than the
aggregate amount of loss contingency reserves we have established in respect of these litigation matters include that: there are
significant factual and legal issues to be resolved; information obtained or rulings made during the lawsuits could affect the
methodology for calculation of the available remedies; and we may have additional obligations pursuant to indemnity agreements,
representations and warranties, and other contractual provisions with other parties relating to these litigation matters that could
increase our potential losses.
F- 101
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 17. Equity
The following table provides a summary of changes to accumulated other comprehensive income by component for the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 17.1 – Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
Net Unrealized
Gains on
Available-for-Sale
Securities
Net Unrealized
Losses on Interest
Rate Agreements
Accounted for as
Cash Flow Hedges
Net Unrealized
Gains on
Available-for-Sale
Securities
Net Unrealized
Losses on Interest
Rate Agreements
Accounted for as
Cash Flow Hedges
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
76,336 $
(80,557) $
92,452 $
(50,939)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from other
accumulated comprehensive income
(loss)
Net current-period other comprehensive
(loss) income
Balance at End of Period
$
8,016
—
(3,951)
(32,806)
(16,849)
(8,833)
67,503 $
4,127
4,127
(76,430) $
(12,165)
3,188
(16,116)
76,336 $
(29,618)
(80,557)
The following table provides a summary of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 17.2 – Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
Amount Reclassified From
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Affected Line Item in the
Income Statement
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2021
Net Realized (Gain) Loss on AFS Securities
(Decrease) increase in allowance for credit losses
on AFS securities
Gain on sale of AFS securities
Investment fair value
changes, net
Realized gains, net
Net Realized Loss on Interest Rate
Agreements Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Amortization of deferred loss
Interest expense
$
$
$
$
(388) $
(16,461)
(16,849) $
4,127 $
4,127 $
388
(12,553)
(12,165)
3,188
3,188
F- 102
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 17. Equity - (continued)
Issuance of Common Stock
In 2018, we established a program to sell up to an aggregate of $150 million of common stock from time to time in at-the-market
("ATM") offerings. In March 2020, we increased the maximum aggregate amount of common stock offered under the ATM program
to $175 million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued 1,578,554 common shares for net proceeds of approximately
$20 million through ATM offerings. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we issued 129,500 common shares for net proceeds
of approximately $2 million through ATM offerings. At December 31, 2021, approximately $90 million remained outstanding for
future offerings under this program.
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued 119,040 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $1 million through our
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not issue any shares of
common stock through our Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan. At December 31, 2021, approximately 6 million
shares remained outstanding for future offerings under this plan.
Earnings per Common Share
The following table provides the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations for the years ended December 31,
2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 17.3 – Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share
(In Thousands, except Share Data)
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Common Share:
Net income (loss) attributable to Redwood
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
$
319,613 $
(581,847) $
169,183
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities
(10,635)
(1,990)
(4,797)
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Common Share
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share:
Net income (loss) attributable to Redwood
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities
Adjust for interest expense and gain on extinguishment of convertible notes for the
period, net of tax
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Net effect of dilutive equity awards
Net effect of assumed convertible notes conversion to common shares
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share
$
308,978 $
(583,837) $
164,386
113,230,190
113,935,605
101,120,744
$
$
2.73 $
(5.12) $
1.63
319,613 $
(9,880)
(581,847) $
(1,990)
169,183
(5,273)
27,463
—
36,212
$
337,196 $
(583,837) $
200,122
113,230,190
113,935,605
101,147,225
273,236
28,566,875
—
—
251,100
35,382,269
142,070,301
113,935,605
136,780,594
$
2.37 $
(5.12) $
1.46
We included participating securities, which are certain equity awards that have non-forfeitable dividend participation rights, in the
calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share as we determined that the two-class method was more dilutive than the
alternative treasury stock method for these shares. Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities under the
basic and diluted earnings per share calculations require specific shares to be included that may differ in certain circumstances.
F- 103
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 17. Equity - (continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2019, certain of our convertible notes were determined to be dilutive and were
included in the calculation of diluted EPS under the "if-converted" method. Under this method, the periodic interest expense (net of
applicable taxes) for dilutive notes is added back to the numerator and the weighted average number of shares that the notes are
entitled to (if converted, regardless of whether they are in or out of the money) are included in the denominator.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 31,306,089 of common shares related to the assumed conversion of our convertible notes
were antidilutive and were excluded in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020,
and 2019, the number of outstanding equity awards that were antidilutive totaled 18,736, 12,622, and 10,051, respectively.
Stock Repurchases
In February 2018, our Board of Directors approved an authorization for the repurchase of our common stock, increasing the total
amount authorized for repurchases of common stock to $100 million, and also authorized the repurchase of outstanding debt securities,
including convertible and exchangeable debt. This authorization increased the previous share repurchase authorization approved in
February 2016 and has no expiration date. This repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares
or securities. Under this authorization, shares or securities may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions,
including under plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. During the year ended
December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization. During the year ended
December 31, 2020, we repurchased 3,047,335 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization for $22 million. At
December 31, 2021, $78 million of the current authorization remained available for the repurchase of shares of our common stock and
we also continued to be authorized to repurchase outstanding debt securities.
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, 5,958,390 and 7,957,891 shares of common stock, respectively, were available for grant under
our Incentive Plan. The unamortized compensation cost of awards issued under the Incentive Plan which are settled by delivery of
shares of common stock and purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan totaled $42 million at December 31, 2021, as shown
in the following table.
Table 18.1 – Activities of Equity Compensation Costs by Award Type
(In Thousands)
Unrecognized compensation cost at
beginning of period
Equity grants
Performance-based valuation adjustment
Equity grant forfeitures
Equity compensation expense
Unrecognized Compensation Cost at
End of Period
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Restricted
Stock
Awards
Restricted
Stock Units
Deferred
Stock Units
Performance
Stock Units
Employee
Stock
Purchase
Plan
$
564 $
3,540 $
17,766 $
5,794 $
— $
—
—
2,371
—
18,380
—
(2)
(695)
(550)
8,125
1,072
—
361
—
—
Total
27,664
29,237
1,072
(1,247)
(478)
(1,627)
(9,123)
(2,754)
(361)
(14,343)
$
84 $
3,589 $
26,473 $
12,237 $
— $
42,383
At December 31, 2021, the weighted average amortization period remaining for all of our equity awards was less than two years.
F- 104
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans - (continued)
Restricted Stock Awards ("RSAs")
The following table summarizes the activities related to RSAs for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 18.2 – Restricted Stock Awards Activities
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
Outstanding at beginning of period
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Outstanding at End of Period
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Shares
78,998 $
—
(50,857)
—
28,141 $
15.23
—
15.50
—
14.74
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Shares
14.85
—
14.44
15.16
15.23
334,606 $
—
(118,136)
—
216,470 $
14.92
—
15.05
—
14.85
Shares
216,470 $
—
(102,615)
(34,857)
78,998 $
The expenses recorded for RSAs were $0.5 million, $1 million, and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and
2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, there was less than $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
RSAs. This cost will be recognized over a weighted average period of less than one year. Restrictions on shares of RSAs outstanding
lapse through 2022.
Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs")
The following table summarizes the activities related to RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 18.3 – Restricted Stock Units Activities
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
Outstanding at beginning of period
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Outstanding at End of Period
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Shares
282,424 $
272,261
(78,270)
(45,343)
431,072 $
16.09
8.80
15.93
15.75
11.55
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Shares
15.65
16.86
15.65
16.60
16.09
4,876 $
270,297
—
—
275,173 $
15.38
15.66
—
—
15.65
Shares
275,173 $
205,482
(68,076)
(130,155)
282,424 $
The expenses recorded for RSUs were $2 million, $1 million, and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and
2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, there was $4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs. This
cost will be recognized over a weighted average period of less than 2 years. Restrictions on shares of RSUs outstanding lapse through
2025.
F- 105
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans - (continued)
Deferred Stock Units (“DSUs”)
The following table summarizes the activities related to DSUs for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 18.4 – Deferred Stock Units Activities
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Units
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Units
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Market
Value
Units
2,805,144 $
1,588,862
(340,757)
(31,161)
4,022,088 $
13.84
12.04
15.82
17.65
12.93
2,630,805 $
1,186,154
(720,562)
(291,253)
2,805,144 $
15.66
10.69
14.31
16.25
13.84
2,336,720 $
733,096
(419,113)
(19,898)
2,630,805 $
15.58
16.06
15.96
15.96
15.66
Outstanding at beginning of period
Granted
Distributions
Forfeitures
Balance at End of Period
We generally grant DSUs annually, as part of our compensation process. In addition, DSUs are granted from time to time in
connection with hiring and promotions and in lieu of the payment in cash of a portion of annual bonus earned. DSUs generally vest
over the course of a four-year vesting period, and are distributed after the end of the final vesting period or after an employee is
terminated. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the number of outstanding DSUs that were unvested was 2,552,186 and 1,599,019,
respectively, and the weighted average grant-date fair value of these unvested DSUs was $12.07 and $13.30 at December 31, 2021 and
2020, respectively. Unvested DSUs at December 31, 2021 will vest through 2025.
Expenses related to DSUs were $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, and were $8 million for both of the years ended
December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. At December 31, 2021, there was $26 million of unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested DSUs. This cost will be recognized over a weighted average period of less than 2 years.
Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”)
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the target number of PSUs that were unvested was 1,473,883 and 978,735, respectively. During
2021, 2020, and 2019, 518,173, 473,845, and 307,938 target number of PSUs were granted, respectively, with per unit grant date fair
values of $15.68, $10.42, and $17.13, respectively. The end of the vesting period for 206,034 target PSU awards that were granted in
2018 was January 1, 2022 and failure to reach a threshold level under their performance-based vesting criteria resulted in the vesting
of no shares of our common stock underlying these PSUs. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 99,175 PSUs were forfeited due
to employee departures. During the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2019, there were no PSUs forfeited due to employee
departures.
With respect to 518,173, 473,845, and 275,831 target number of PSUs granted in December 2021, December 2020, and
December 2019, respectively, and outstanding at December 31, 2021, the number of underlying shares of common stock that vest and
that the recipient becomes entitled to receive at the time of vesting will generally range from 0% to 250% of the target number of
PSUs granted, with the target number of PSUs granted being adjusted to reflect the value of any dividends declared on our common
stock during the vesting period. Vesting of these PSUs will generally occur as of January 1, 2025 for the December 2021 awards,
January 1, 2024 for the December 2020 awards, and January 1, 2023 for the December 2019 awards. Vesting criteria for these awards
are based on a three-step process as described below.
F- 106
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans - (continued)
With respect to the December 2021 and 2020 PSU awards:
•
•
•
Target PSUs are divided into three equal tranches. Baseline vesting for each tranche would range from 0% - 200% of the
Target PSUs in such tranche based on the level of the Company's book value total shareholder return ("bvTSR") attained over
a corresponding calendar year measurement period within the three-year vesting period, with 100% of the Target PSUs in
each tranche vesting if one-year bvTSR for such tranche is 7.7%.
Second, at the end of the three-year vesting period, the aggregate vesting level of the three tranches, or total baseline vesting,
would then be adjusted to increase or decrease by up to 50 percentage points based on the Company's three-year relative total
stockholder return ("rTSR") against a comparator group of companies measured over the three-year vesting period, with
median rTSR performance correlating to no adjustment from the total baseline level of vesting.
Third, if the aggregate vesting level after steps one and two is greater than 100% of the Target PSUs, but the Company's
absolute total shareholder return ("TSR") is negative over the three-year performance period, vesting would be capped at
100% of Target PSUs.
With respect to the December 2019 and December 2018 PSU awards:
•
•
•
First, baseline vesting would range from 0% - 200% of the target number of PSUs granted based on the level of bvTSR
attained over the three-year vesting period, with 100% of the target number of PSUs vesting if three-year bvTSR is 25%.
Book Value TSR is defined as the percentage by which our book value "per share price" has increased or decreased as of the
last day of the three-year vesting period relative to the first day of such vesting period, adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of
all dividends declared and/or paid on our common stock, compared to the bvTSR goal for the performance period.
Second, the vesting level would then be adjusted to increase or decrease by up to an additional 50 percentage points based on
Redwood’s rTSR against a comparator group of companies measured over the three-year vesting period, with median rTSR
performance correlating to no adjustment from the baseline level of vesting.
Third, if the vesting level after steps one and two is greater than 100% of the target number of PSUs, but absolute TSR is
negative over the three-year performance period, vesting would be capped at 100% of target number of PSUs. TSR is defined
as the percentage by which our common stock “per share price” has increased or decreased as of the last day of the three-year
vesting period relative to the first day of such vesting period, adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of all dividends declared
and/or paid on our common stock (“Three-Year TSR”).
The grant date fair value of the December 2021 PSUs of $15.68 per unit was determined through Monte-Carlo simulations using
the following assumptions: the common stock closing price at the grant date for Redwood and each member of the comparator group,
the average closing price of the common stock price for the 60 trading days beginning January 1, 2022 for Redwood and each member
of the comparator group, and the range of performance-based vesting based on absolute TSR over three years from the grant date. For
the 2021 PSU grant, an implied volatility assumption of 59% (based on historical volatility), a risk-free rate of 0.98% (the three-year
Treasury rate on the grant date), and a 0% dividend yield (the mathematical equivalent to reinvesting the dividends over the three-year
performance period as is consistent with the terms of the PSUs) were used.
The grant date fair value of the December 2020 PSUs of $10.42 per unit was determined through Monte-Carlo simulations using
the following assumptions: the common stock closing price at the grant date for Redwood and each member of the comparator group,
the average closing price of the common stock price for the 60 trading days beginning January 1, 2021 for Redwood and each member
of the comparator group, and the range of performance-based vesting based on absolute TSR over three years from the grant date. For
the 2020 PSU grant, an implied volatility assumption of 54% (based on historical volatility), a risk-free rate of 0.18% (the three-year
Treasury rate on the grant date), and a 0% dividend yield (the mathematical equivalent to reinvesting the dividends over the three-year
performance period as is consistent with the terms of the PSUs) were used.
F- 107
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans - (continued)
The grant date fair value of the December 2019 PSUs of $17.13 per unit was determined through Monte-Carlo simulations using
the following assumptions: the common stock closing price at the grant date for Redwood and each member of the comparator group,
the average closing price of the common stock price for the 60 trading days prior to the grant date for Redwood and each member of
the comparator group, and the range of performance-based vesting based on Absolute TSR over three years from the grant date. For
the 2019 PSU grant, an implied volatility assumption of 15% (based on historical volatility), a risk-free rate of 1.68% (the three-year
Treasury rate on the grant date), and a 0% dividend yield (the mathematical equivalent to reinvesting the dividends over the three-year
performance period as is consistent with the terms of the PSUs) were used.
The grant date fair value of the December 2018 PSUs of $17.23 per unit was determined through Monte-Carlo simulations using
the following assumptions: the common stock closing price at the grant date for Redwood and each member of the comparator group,
the average closing price of the common stock price for the 60 trading days prior to the grant date for Redwood and each member of
the comparator group, and the range of performance-based vesting based on Absolute TSR over three years from the grant date. For
the 2018 PSU grant, an implied volatility assumption of 22% (based on historical volatility), a risk-free rate of 2.78% (the three-year
Treasury rate on the grant date), and a 0% dividend yield (the mathematical equivalent to reinvesting the dividends over the three-year
performance period as is consistent with the terms of the PSUs) were used.
In May 2018, 23,025 target number of PSUs with a per unit grant date fair value of $15.20 were granted to two executives in
connection with their promotions. The grant date fair values of these PSUs were determined through Monte-Carlo simulations using
the following assumptions: our common stock closing price at the grant date, the average closing price of our common stock price for
the 60 trading days prior to the grant date and the range of performance-based vesting based on Three-Year TSR and the performance-
based vesting formula described below with respect to PSUs granted in December 2017. For this PSU grant, an implied volatility
assumption of 27% (based on historical volatility), a risk-free rate of 2.71% (the three-year Treasury rate on the grant date), and a 0%
dividend yield (the mathematical equivalent to reinvesting the dividends over the three-year performance period as is consistent with
the terms of the PSUs) were used.
With respect to PSUs granted in May 2018, the three-year performance period ended during the second quarter of 2021, resulting
in the vesting of no shares of our common stock. With respect to the PSUs granted in December 2018, the three-year performance
period ended on January 1, 2022, resulting in the vesting of no shares of our common stock. With respect to PSUs granted in 2017, the
three-year performance period ended during the fourth quarter of 2020, resulting in the vesting of no shares of our common stock.
With respect to the PSUs granted in 2016, the three-year performance period ended during the fourth quarter of 2019, resulting in the
vesting of 222,769 shares of our common stock.
Expenses related to PSUs were $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, $0.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2020, and $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2021, there was $12 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested PSUs. During 2021, for PSUs granted in 2020, we adjusted the future amortization expense by
$1 million to reflect our current estimate of the number of shares expected to vest in relation to the performance condition for the
initial one-year vesting tranche. During 2020, for PSUs granted in 2018 and 2019, we adjusted our vesting estimate to assume that
none of these awards will meet the minimum performance thresholds for vesting. This adjustment resulted in a reversal of $1 million
of stock-based compensation expense that had been recorded prior to 2020.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP")
The ESPP allows a maximum of 850,000 shares of common stock to be purchased in aggregate for all employees. As of
December 31, 2021, 569,728 shares had been purchased, respectively, and there remained a negligible amount of uninvested employee
contributions in the ESPP at December 31, 2021.
F- 108
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 18. Equity Compensation Plans - (continued)
The following table summarizes the activities related to the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 18.5 – Employee Stock Purchase Plan Activities
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Employee purchases
Cost of common stock issued
Balance at End of Period
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
$
17 $
595
(605)
7 $
4 $
347
(334)
17 $
6
524
(526)
4
The following table summarizes the cash account activities related to the EDCP for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020,
and 2019.
Table 18.6 – EDCP Cash Accounts Activities
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
New deferrals
Accrued interest
Withdrawals
Balance at End of Period
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
2,289 $
2,454 $
2,484
1,017
56
726
42
(632)
(933)
$
2,730 $
2,289 $
789
68
(887)
2,454
In 2018, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the EDCP to increase by 200,000 shares the shares available to allow
non-employee directors to defer certain cash payments and dividends into DSUs. At December 31, 2021, there were 43,225 shares
available for grant under this plan.
F- 109
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 19. Mortgage Banking Activities
The following table presents the components of Mortgage banking activities, net, recorded in our consolidated statements of
income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 19.1 – Mortgage Banking Activities
(In Thousands)
Residential Mortgage Banking Activities, Net
Changes in fair value of:
Residential loans, at fair value (1)
Trading securities (2)
Risk management derivatives (3)
Other income (expense), net (4)
Total residential mortgage banking activities, net
Business Purpose Mortgage Banking Activities, Net
Changes in fair value of:
Single-family rental loans, at fair value (1)
Risk management derivatives (3)
Bridge loans, at fair value
Other income, net (5)
Total business purpose mortgage banking activities, net
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
83,733 $
41,284 $
63,527
(352)
(4,535)
—
38,352
5,418
127,151
(26,376)
(17,519)
(6,652)
3,721
1,735
47,743
63,872
2,708
8,253
33,760
108,593
82,510
(21,403)
(4,998)
18,642
74,751
17,004
1,796
4,518
16,205
39,523
87,266
Mortgage Banking Activities, Net
$
235,744 $
78,472 $
(1) For residential loans, includes changes in fair value for associated loan purchase and forward sale commitments. For single-family rental loans,
includes changes in fair value for associated interest rate lock commitments.
(2) Represents fair value changes on trading securities that are being used along with risk management derivatives as hedges to manage the mark-to-
market risks associated with our residential mortgage banking operations.
(3) Represents market valuation changes of derivatives that were used to manage risks associated with our mortgage banking operations.
(4) Amounts in this line item include other fee income from loan acquisitions, provisions for repurchase expense, and expenses related to resolving
residential loan seller demands, presented net.
(5) Amounts in this line item include other fee income from loan originations.
F- 110
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 20. Other Income
The following table presents the components of Other income recorded in our consolidated statements of income (loss) for the
years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Table 20.1 – Other Income
(In Thousands)
MSR income (loss), net
Risk share income
FHLBC capital stock dividend
Bridge Loan Fees
BPL loan administration fee income
Gain on re-measurement of investment in 5 Arches
Other
Other Income
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2021
2019
$
2,380 $
(9,694) $
2,815
53
4,194
184
—
2,392
4,367
1,229
3,812
2,912
—
1,562
3,521
3,522
2,169
1,451
4,400
2,441
1,753
$
12,018 $
4,188 $
19,257
F- 111
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 21. General and Administrative Expenses, Loan Acquisition Costs, and Other Expenses
Components of our general and administrative expenses, loan acquisition costs, and other expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are presented in the following table.
Table 21.1 – Components of General and Administrative Expenses, Loan Acquisition Costs, and Other Expenses
(In Thousands)
General and Administrative Expenses
Fixed compensation expense
Annual variable compensation expense
Long-term incentive award expense (1)
Acquisition-related equity compensation expense (2)
Systems and consulting
Office costs
Accounting and legal
Corporate costs
Other
Total General and Administrative Expenses
Loan Acquisition Costs
Commissions
Underwriting costs
Transfer and holding costs
Total Loan Acquisition Costs
Other Expenses
Goodwill impairment expense
Amortization of purchase-related intangible assets
Contingent consideration expense (3)
Other
Total Other Expenses
Total General and Administrative Expenses, Loan Acquisition
Costs, and Other Expenses
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
46,328 $
46,689 $
58,569
19,938
3,813
14,445
7,837
4,975
3,388
11,566
170,859
7,116
7,762
1,458
16,336
—
15,304
—
1,391
16,695
14,116
12,439
4,848
11,728
7,794
7,928
2,829
6,833
39,639
21,728
13,402
1,010
10,746
6,310
5,450
2,351
8,101
115,204
108,737
4,321
4,945
1,757
11,023
88,675
15,925
—
4,185
108,785
3,833
4,767
1,335
9,935
—
8,696
3,218
1,108
13,022
$
203,890 $
235,012 $
131,694
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, long-term incentive award expense includes $14 million and $10 million, respectively, of
expense for awards settleable in shares of our common stock and $6 million and $2 million, respectively, of expense for awards settleable in
cash.
(2) Acquisition-related equity compensation expense relates to 588,260 shares of restricted stock that were issued to members of CoreVest
management as a component of the consideration paid to them for our purchase of their interests in CoreVest in 2019. The grant date fair value
of these restricted stock awards was $10 million, which was recognized as compensation expense over the two-year vesting period on a straight-
line basis in accordance with GAAP.
(3) Contingent consideration expense relates to the acquisition of 5 Arches during 2019. Refer to Note 2 for additional detail.
F- 112
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 21. General and Administrative Expenses, Loan Acquisition Costs, and Other Expenses - (continued)
Long Term Cash-Based Awards
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, $1 million and $8 million of long-term cash-based retention awards were
granted to certain executive and non-executive employees that will vest and be paid over a three year period, subject to continued
employment through the vesting periods from 2021 through 2024. Additionally, during 2020, Cash Performance Awards with an
aggregate granted award value of $2 million, were granted to certain executive and non-executive employees that will vest between
0% to 400% of granted award value based on a relative total stockholder return measure, and are contingent on continued employment
over a three-year service period.
The value of long-term cash-based awards is being amortized into expense on a straight-line basis over each award's respective
vesting period. The Cash Performance Awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years; however, they are remeasured at
fair value each quarter-end and the cumulative straight-line expense is trued-up in respect to their updated value. For the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, General and administrative expenses included $3 million and $5 million of aggregate expense,
respectively, related to long-term cash-based awards and the Cash Performance awards.
Cash-Settled Deferred Stock Units
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, $4 million and $2 million of cash-settled deferred stock units were granted
to certain executive officers and non-executive employees that will vest over the next four years through 2025 and 2024, respectively.
These 2021 and 2020 awards will be fully vested and payable in cash with a vested award value based on the closing market price of
our common stock on the final vesting date in December 2025 and December 2024, respectively. These awards are classified as a
liability in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, and will be amortized over the vesting period on
a straight-line basis, adjusted for changes in the value of our common stock at the end of each reporting period. For the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recognized an expense of $2 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, for cash-settled
deferred stock units in "Long-term incentive award expense," as presented in Table 21.1 above.
F- 113
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 22. Taxes
Components of our net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are presented in the following table.
Table 22.1 – Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)
(In Thousands)
Deferred Tax Assets
Net operating loss carryforward – state
Net capital loss carryforward – state
Net operating loss carryforward – federal
Real estate assets
Allowances and accruals
Goodwill and intangible assets
Other
Tax effect of unrealized (gains) / losses - OCI
Total Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Interest rate agreements
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
Valuation allowance
Total Deferred Tax Asset (Liability), net of Valuation Allowance
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
$
$
98,011 $
18,082
82
1,347
3,528
24,973
3,016
(21)
149,018
(3,617)
(3,324)
(6,941)
(121,210)
20,867 $
103,334
23,487
82
2,948
3,324
23,231
1,914
124
158,444
(2,458)
(3,867)
(6,325)
(151,248)
871
The deferred tax assets and liabilities reported above, with the exception of the state net operating loss ("NOL") and capital loss
carryforwards, relate solely to our TRS. For state purposes, the REIT files a unitary combined return with its TRS. Because the REIT
may have state taxable income apportioned to it from the activity of its TRS, we report the entire combined unitary state NOL and
capital loss carryforwards as deferred tax assets, including the carryforwards allocated to the REIT.
Realization of our deferred tax assets ("DTAs") at December 31, 2021, is dependent on many factors, including generating
sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of NOL carryforwards and generating sufficient capital gains in future periods prior to
the expiration of capital loss carryforwards. We determine the extent to which realization of the deferred assets is not assured and
establish a valuation allowance accordingly.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we reassessed the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets ("DTAs") noting an
increase in positive evidence related to our ability to utilize certain DTAs. The positive evidence includes significant revenue growth
in recent quarters and expectations regarding future profitability at our TRS. After assessing both the positive and negative evidence,
we determined it was more likely than not that we will realize all of our federal DTAs. Therefore, we reversed our federal valuation
allowance of $17 million as a discrete benefit in the third quarter of 2021. In addition to the federal valuation allowance release, we
determined it was more likely than not that we will realize a portion of our state DTAs and, as such, reversed $3 million of state
valuation allowance as a discrete item in the third quarter of 2021. Consistent with prior periods, we continued to maintain a valuation
allowance against the majority of our net state DTAs as we remained uncertain about our ability to generate sufficient income in future
periods needed to utilize net state DTAs beyond the reversal of our state DTLs.
We reported net federal ordinary and capital DTAs at December 31, 2020, and as a result of GAAP losses at our TRS in 2020, a
valuation allowance was recorded against our net federal ordinary DTAs. However, no valuation allowance was recorded against our
net federal capital DTAs as we expected to utilize these DTAs due to our ability to recognize capital losses and carry them back to
prior years. Consistent with prior periods, at December 31, 2020, we maintained a valuation allowance against our net state DTAs as
F- 114
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 22. Taxes (continued)
we remained uncertain about our ability to generate sufficient income in future periods needed to utilize net state DTAs beyond the
reversal of our state DTLs.
Our estimate of net deferred tax assets could change in future periods to the extent that actual or revised estimates of future
taxable income during the carryforward periods change from current expectations. We assessed our tax positions for all open tax years
(i.e., Federal, 2018 to 2021, and State, 2017 to 2021) and, at December 31, 2021 and 2020, concluded that we had no uncertain tax
positions that resulted in material unrecognized tax benefits.
At December 31, 2021, our federal NOL carryforward at the REIT was $37 million, of which $29 million will expire in 2029 and
$9 million will carry forward indefinitely. In order to utilize NOLs at the REIT, taxable income must exceed dividend distributions. At
December 31, 2021, our taxable REIT subsidiaries had $0.4 million of federal NOLs, of which $0.2 million will expire beginning in
2035 and $0.2 million will carry forward indefinitely. Redwood and its taxable REIT subsidiaries accumulated an estimated state NOL
of $1.14 billion at December 31, 2021. These NOLs expire beginning in 2032. If certain substantial changes in the Company’s
ownership occur, there could be an annual limitation on the amount of the carryforwards that can be utilized.
The following table summarizes the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 22.2 – Provision for Income Taxes
(In Thousands)
Current Provision for Income Taxes
Federal
State
Total Current Provision for Income Taxes
Deferred (Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
Federal
State
Total Deferred (Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
Total Provision (Benefit From) for Income Taxes
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
28,718 $
1,598 $
12,036
9,859
38,577
(182)
1,416
897
12,933
(17,172)
(2,927)
(20,099)
$
18,478 $
(6,024)
—
(6,024)
(4,608) $
(3,976)
(1,517)
(5,493)
7,440
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal and state tax rates to our effective tax rate at December 31, 2021, 2020,
and 2019.
Table 22.3 – Reconciliation of Statutory Tax Rate to Effective Tax Rate
Federal statutory rate
State statutory rate, net of Federal tax effect
Differences in taxable (loss) income from GAAP income
Change in valuation allowance
Dividends paid deduction (1)
Effective Tax Rate
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
21.0 %
8.6 %
(8.0) %
(8.9) %
(7.2) %
5.5 %
21.0 %
8.6 %
(19.6) %
(9.2) %
— %
0.8 %
21.0 %
8.6 %
(2.1) %
(2.2) %
(21.1) %
4.2 %
(1) The dividends paid deduction in the effective tax rate reconciliation is generally representative of the amount of distributions to shareholders
that reduce REIT taxable income. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the dividends paid deduction is 0% due to our REIT incurring a
taxable loss during the period; therefore, there was no REIT taxable income available to apply against the dividends paid.
F- 115
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 22. Taxes (continued)
We believe that we have met all requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Many requirements for
qualification as a REIT are complex and require analysis of particular facts and circumstances. Often there is only limited judicial or
administrative interpretive guidance and as such there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or courts would agree
with our various tax positions. If we were to fail to meet all the requirements for qualification as a REIT and the requirements for
statutory relief, we would be subject to federal corporate income tax on our taxable income and we would not be able to elect to be
taxed as a REIT for four years thereafter. Such an outcome could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
F- 116
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 23. Segment Information
Redwood operates in three segments: Residential Mortgage Banking, Business Purpose Mortgage Banking and Investment
Portfolio. During the fourth quarter of 2021 we re-organized our segments to conform with changes in how we manage and evaluate
our operations, moving all retained investments previously held in our Residential Lending and Business Purpose Lending segments to
a newly-created Investment Portfolio Segment, where they are now combined with our third-party portfolio investments. Our
mortgage banking activities are now reflected in standalone Residential Mortgage Banking and Business Purpose Mortgage Banking
segments. We conformed the presentation of prior periods. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those
described in Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. For a full description of our segments, see Item 1—Business in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Segment contribution represents the measure of profit that management uses to assess the performance of our business segments
and make resource allocation and operating decisions. Certain corporate expenses not directly assigned or allocated to one of our three
segments, as well as activity from certain consolidated Sequoia entities, are included in the Corporate/Other column as reconciling
items to our consolidated financial statements. These unallocated corporate expenses primarily include interest expense for our
convertible notes and trust preferred securities (and in 2020, realized gains from the repurchase of convertible notes), indirect general
and administrative expenses and other expense.
The following tables present financial information by segment for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 23.1 – Business Segment Financial Information
(In Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Mortgage banking activities, net
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest income, net
General and administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expenses
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
Segment Contribution
Net Income
Non-cash amortization (expense) income, net
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Residential
Mortgage
Banking
Business
Purpose
Mortgage
Banking
Investment
Portfolio
Corporate/
Other
Total
$
48,953 $
(26,963)
21,990
14,054 $
(7,230)
6,824
507,173 $
(351,635)
155,538
4,746 $
(40,921)
(36,175)
574,926
(426,749)
148,177
127,151
—
—
—
127,151
(33,574)
(7,480)
104
(25,777)
82,414 $
108,593
—
1,046
—
109,639
(46,586)
(8,100)
(15,127)
(8,122)
38,528 $
—
129,614
10,021
17,993
157,628
(13,633)
(752)
(1,689)
(3,862)
293,230 $
—
(1,565)
951
—
(614)
(77,066)
(4)
17
19,283
(94,559)
235,744
128,049
12,018
17,993
393,804
(170,859)
(16,336)
(16,695)
(18,478)
(82) $
(16,452) $
(20,781) $
$
(7,878) $
319,613
(45,193)
$
$
F- 117
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 23. Segment Information (continued)
(In Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Mortgage banking activities, net
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest income (loss), net
General and administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expenses
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes
Segment Contribution
Net Loss
Non-cash amortization income (expense), net
Other significant non-cash expense: goodwill
impairment
(In Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Non-interest income
Mortgage banking activities, net
Investment fair value changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest income, net
General and administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expense
Provision for income taxes
Segment Contribution
Net Income
Non-cash amortization income (expense), net
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Residential
Mortgage
Banking
Business
Purpose
Mortgage
Banking
Investment
Portfolio
Corporate/
Other
Total
$
17,839 $
(11,978)
5,861
19,200 $
(13,145)
6,055
525,741 $
(375,262)
150,479
9,136 $
(47,620)
(38,484)
571,916
(448,005)
123,911
3,721
—
—
—
3,721
(16,297)
(2,727)
(4,114)
4,567
(8,989) $
74,622
129
(101)
3,228
—
77,749
(37,460)
(5,860)
(104,147)
(4,063)
(67,726) $
(586,333)
(1,725)
5,242
(582,687)
(8,547)
(2,426)
194
4,104
(438,883) $
—
(2,004)
2,685
25,182
25,863
(52,900)
(10)
(718)
—
(66,249)
78,472
(588,438)
4,188
30,424
(475,354)
(115,204)
(11,023)
(108,785)
4,608
(662) $
(18,426) $
(1,282) $
$
(4,954) $
(581,847)
(25,324)
— $
(88,675) $
— $
— $
(88,675)
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Residential
Mortgage
Banking
Business
Purpose
Mortgage
Banking
Investment
Portfolio
Corporate/
Other
Total
$
40,901 $
(21,503)
19,398
8,212 $
(4,972)
3,240
555,519 $
(390,188)
165,331
17,649 $
(63,145)
(45,496)
622,281
(479,808)
142,473
47,743
39,523
(1)
—
—
47,742
(21,724)
(3,954)
—
(4,074)
37,388 $
(175)
5,139
—
44,487
(24,832)
(4,226)
(8,521)
(947)
9,201 $
—
37,293
11,407
23,821
72,521
(9,313)
(1,618)
(1,106)
(2,419)
223,396 $
—
(1,617)
2,711
—
1,094
(52,868)
(137)
(3,395)
—
(100,802)
87,266
35,500
19,257
23,821
165,844
(108,737)
(9,935)
(13,022)
(7,440)
(97) $
(8,896) $
10,445 $
$
(4,813) $
169,183
(3,361)
$
$
F- 118
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 23. Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents the components of Corporate/Other for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Table 23.2 – Components of Corporate/Other
2021
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2019
Legacy
Consolidated
VIEs (1)
Other
Total
Legacy
Consolidated
VIEs (1)
Other
Total
Legacy
Consolidated
VIEs (1)
Other
Total
$
4,709 $
37 $
4,746 $
9,060 $
76 $
9,136 $
17,649 $
— $
17,649
(3,040)
(37,881)
(40,921)
(5,945)
(41,675)
(47,620)
(14,418)
(48,727)
(63,145)
1,669
(37,844)
(36,175)
3,115
(41,599)
(38,484)
3,231
(48,727)
(45,496)
(1,558)
—
—
(1,558)
—
—
—
—
(7)
951
—
944
(1,565)
(1,512)
(492)
(2,004)
(1,545)
951
—
—
—
2,685
25,182
2,685
25,182
—
—
(72)
2,711
—
(1,617)
2,711
—
(614)
(1,512)
27,375
25,863
(1,545)
2,639
1,094
(77,066)
(77,066)
(4)
17
(4)
17
19,283
19,283
—
—
—
—
(52,900)
(52,900)
(10)
(718)
(10)
(718)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(52,868)
(52,868)
(137)
(3,395)
(137)
(3,395)
—
—
(In Thousands)
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
(loss)
Non-interest income
Investment fair value
changes, net
Other income, net
Realized gains, net
Total non-interest
(loss) income, net
General and
administrative expenses
Loan acquisition costs
Other expenses
Benefit from income
taxes
Total
$
111 $
(94,670) $
(94,559) $
1,603 $
(67,852) $
(66,249) $
1,686 $ (102,488) $ (100,802)
(1) Legacy consolidated VIEs represent Legacy Sequoia entities that are consolidated for GAAP financial reporting purposes. See Note 4 for further
discussion on VIEs.
F- 119
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 23. Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents supplemental information by segment at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 23.3 – Supplemental Segment Information
(In Thousands)
December 31, 2021
Residential loans
Business purpose loans
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Other investments
Intangible assets
Total assets
December 31, 2020
Residential loans
Business purpose loans
Multifamily loans
Real estate securities
Other investments
Intangible assets
Total assets
Residential
Mortgage
Banking
Business
Purpose
Mortgage
Banking
Investment
Portfolio
Corporate/
Other
Total
$ 1,673,235 $
— $ 5,688,742 $
—
—
4,927
—
—
1,716,285
347,860
—
—
—
41,561
464,967
4,443,129
473,514
372,484
606,267
—
11,770,486
230,455 $ 7,592,432
4,790,989
473,514
377,411
641,969
41,561
14,706,944
—
—
—
35,702
—
755,206
$
176,641 $
—
—
5,279
—
—
242,060
— $ 3,786,475 $
245,394
—
—
—
56,865
328,564
3,890,959
492,221
338,846
343,724
—
8,970,633
285,935 $ 4,249,051
4,136,353
492,221
344,125
348,175
56,865
10,355,066
—
—
—
4,451
—
813,809
F- 120
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
Note 24. Subsequent Events
In January 2022, we issued 5,232,869 common shares for net proceeds of approximately $67 million through ATM offerings. At
February 25, 2022, approximately $22 million remained outstanding for future offerings under this program.
F- 121
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2021
Number of
Loans
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Carrying
Amount
Principal Amount
Subject to
Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
(In Thousands)
Description
Residential Loans Held-for-Investment
At Legacy Sequoia (1):
ARM loans
Hybrid ARM loans
At Sequoia (1):
Hybrid ARM loans
Fixed loans
At Freddie Mac SLST (2):
Fixed loans
1,574
0.25 % to 5.63%
2022-01 - 2036-03
$
227,302 $
9
2.50 % to 2.63%
2033-07 - 2034-03
3,153
28
3.13 % to 6.75%
2044-04 - 2050-01
4,272
1.88 % to 6.75%
2029-04 - 2051-12
21,855
3,606,610
11,986
2.00 % to 11.00%
2021-12 - 2061-10
1,888,230
Total Residential Loans Held-for-Investment
$
5,747,150 $
Residential Loans Held-for-Sale (3):
Hybrid ARM loans
Fixed loans
Total Residential Loans Held-for-Sale
Single-Family Rental Loans Held-for-Sale (3):
57
1.88 % to 4.00%
2032-11 - 2052-01
2,139
2.50 % to 5.88%
2026-04 - 2052-01
Fixed loans
245
3.38 % to 7.75%
2020-01 - 2052-01
Total Single-Family Rental Loans Held-for-Sale
Single-Family Rental Loans Held-for-Investment:
At CAFL (1):
Fixed loans
Total Single-Family Rental Loans Held-for-Investment
Residential Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment (4):
Fixed loans
Floating ARM loans
Total Residential Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment
Residential Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment at CAFL:
Fixed loans
Floating ARM loans
1,173
3.81 % to 7.57%
2022-02 - 2031-10
187
947
920
720
5.45 % to 12.00%
2019-08 - 2023-11
4.25 % to 10.00%
2019-08 - 2024-12
5.45 % to 10.65%
2022-01 - 2023-11
5.75 % to 10.50%
2021-10 - 2023-12
Total Residential Bridge Loans Held-for-Investment at CAFL
Multifamily Loans Held-for-Investment (2):
At Freddie Mac K-Series:
Fixed loans
Total Multifamily Loans Held-for-Investment
28
4.25 % to 4.25%
2025-09 - 2025-09
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
52,532 $
1,792,750
1,845,282 $
358,309 $
358,309 $
3,488,074 $
3,488,074 $
91,580 $
574,784 $
666,364 $
137,671 $
140,571 $
278,242 $
473,514 $
473,514 $
7,482
—
—
15,124
212,961
235,567
—
2,923
2,923
5,384
5,384
41,998
41,998
17,115
916
18,031
—
—
—
—
—
(1) For our held-for-investment loans at consolidated Legacy Sequoia, Sequoia, and CAFL entities, the aggregate tax basis for Federal income tax
purposes at December 31, 2021 was zero, as the transfers of these loans into securitizations were treated as sales for tax purposes.
(2) Our held-for-investment loans at Freddie Mac SLST and Freddie Mac K-Series entities were consolidated for GAAP purposes. For tax purposes,
we acquired real estate securities issued by these entities and therefore, the tax basis in these loans was zero at December 31, 2021.
(3) The aggregate tax basis for Federal income tax purposes of our mortgage loans held at Redwood approximates the carrying values, as disclosed
in the schedule.
(4) For our held-for-investment bridge loans at Redwood, the aggregate tax basis for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2021 was $950
million.
F- 122
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE TO SCHEDULE IV - RECONCILIATION OF MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2021
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of mortgage loans on real estate during the years ended
December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Additions during period:
Originations/acquisitions
Deductions during period:
Sales
Principal repayments
Transfers to REO
Deconsolidation adjustments
Changes in fair value, net
Balance at end of period
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2019
$
8,877,626 $
15,630,117 $
9,540,598
15,427,382
5,914,728
12,911,261
(8,660,440)
(6,398,690)
(2,675,859)
(2,313,143)
(40,038)
(14,104)
—
(3,849,779)
(5,218,797)
(1,851,278)
(7,552)
—
(71,737)
(91,503)
255,885
$
12,856,934 $
8,877,626 $
15,630,117
F- 123