Quarterlytics / Industrials / Renault

Renault

rno · LSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker rno
Exchange LSE
Sector Industrials
Industry
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · Renault
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
26945  22 August 2019 5:26 pm  Proof 5Continuing  to progressRenold plc Annual Report and Accountsfor the year ended 31 March 2019Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019www.renold.com Stock code: RNORenold 2019-AR.indd   322/08/2019   17:27:52OVERVIEW

Introduction

Renold plc is an international group delivering 
high precision engineered power transmission 
products to our customers worldwide.
Our market-leading products can be seen in diverse applications from cement making to 
chocolate manufacturing, subway trains to power stations, escalators to quarries; in fact, 
anywhere something needs to be lifted, moved, rotated or conveyed.

Our key areas of focus
Our objective at Renold is to deliver mid-teens operating margins. 
The Strategic Plan provides a framework to deliver the key actions 
that will generate the improvements supporting progress towards 
achieving this objective. It is built on a bedrock of continuous 
improvement that is applied to add value in all of our business 
processes. Through the Strategic Plan and our strategic goals,  
we are re-engineering everything that we do.

READ MORE ABOUT OUR STRATEGY  
ON PAGES 06 TO 45

IFC

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   4

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:27:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Highlights

REVENUE (£m)
£202.4m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

181.4

165.2

183.4

191.6

202.4

UNDERLYING1 REVENUE (£m)
£202.4m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

184.8
183.9

190.8

203.0

202.4

OPERATING PROFIT  
(£m)
£15.2m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

5.1³

12.1
11.1
10.0³

15.2 

ADJUSTED2 OPERATING 
PROFIT (£m)
£15.4m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

13.5³
13.7³

14.2

15.5

15.4

EARNINGS PER SHARE  
(pence)
2.9p
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

(1.2)³

1.7³

2.5
2.4

2.9 

ADJUSTED2 EARNINGS PER 
SHARE (pence)
4.5p
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

4.2³

4.3³

5.0

4.7

4.5

1 

2 

3 

Underlying results for prior years are retranslated to current year exchange rates for 
foreign currencies.

The Group uses alternative performance measures to provide useful historical financial 
information to help investors evaluate the underlying performance of the business. 
A reconciliation to reported results is included in Note 1 and Note 5 to the consolidated 
financial statements.

See Note 27 to the financial statements for details of the prior period adjustment which has 
restated these figures.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

CONTENTS
OVERVIEW 
Introduction 
Highlights 
Group at a Glance 
Chairman’s Letter 

STRATEGIC REPORT 
Market Review 
Business Model 
Our Customer Journey 
Strategy 
Chief Executive’s Review 
Our Key Performance Indicators 
Our Performance: Chain  
Our Performance: Torque Transmission 
Finance Director’s Review 
Our Risks 
Principal Risks and Uncertainties 
Viability Statement 
Sustainability 

GOVERNANCE 
Chairman’s Letter 
Board of Directors 
Corporate Governance Report 
Audit Committee Report 
Nomination Committee Report 
Directors’ Remuneration Report 
Directors’ Report 
Directors’ Responsibilities Statement 
Shareholder Information 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
Independent Auditor’s Report 
to the Members of Renold plc  
Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income 
Consolidated Balance Sheet 
Consolidated Statement of 
Changes in Equity 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
Accounting Policies 
Notes to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements 
Group Five Year Financial Review 
Company only Financial Statements: 
Accounting Policies 
Company Balance Sheet 
Company Statement of 
Changes in Equity  
Notes to the Company 
Financial Statements 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Corporate Information 

IFC
01
02
04

06
08
10
12
14
18
20
22 
24
30
32
37
38

46
48
50
58
64
66 
83
87
88

89

98
99

100
101
102

106
140

141
142

143

144

150

01

Renold 2019-AR.indd   1

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:27:55

26945  22 August 2019 5:26 pm  Proof 4OVERVIEWRenold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 201902Group at a GlanceRenold plc is an international group delivering high precision engineered  products and solutions to our customers worldwide.ChainTorque TransmissionA global market-leading supplier of chain for many applications, including heavy duty, high precision, indoor or outdoor, high or low temperature and in clean or contaminated environments. We have manufacturing sites across the world, including in the USA, Germany, India, China, Malaysia and Australia in addition to local service capabilities in a number of other markets. We operate at the leading edge of technology, with innovative products designed to meet customers’ exacting standards.Our vast range of roller chains means that for most requirements there is a Renold solution. Our premier brand, Renold Synergy, offers unbeatable wear and fatigue performance, while our all-purpose range of standard chain provides affordable reliability. Continuous research, development, innovation and ingenuity has led to the production of more specialised solutions such as Hydro-Service, with its superior corrosion-resistant coating, and the Syno range which sets a new benchmark for chains requiring little or no lubrication. Conveyor chain applications, including theme park rides, water treatment plants, cement mills, agricultural machinery, mining and sugar production, all rely on the high-specification materials and processes used by Renold. Renold is also a market leader in leaf chain used in many of the forklift trucks produced worldwide.Our high specification Tooth Chain (sometimes known as silent chain) produces a wide range of inverted Tooth Chain for drives and for conveying applications. Offering a high degree of economic efficiency and reliability, Tooth Chain applications are wide-ranging and include glass production and automobile assembly lines.A global manufacturer and developer of industrial coupling and gearbox solutions, from fluid couplings to rubber-in-compression and rubber-in-shear couplings, and a complete range of worm gears, helical and bevel helical worm drives. We also manufacture custom gear spindles and gear couplings for the primary metals industry and we are experts in providing bespoke gear solutions across industries worldwide, such as power generation, rail and escalator transit systems, metals and materials handling. We have manufacturing sites across the world, including in the USA, the UK and South Africa. Our design capability and innovation is recognised by customers around the world and is utilised in customising our gearboxes and couplings to meet our customers’ specific requirements. Our solutions deliver durability, reliability and long life for demanding industrial applications. Renold Torque Transmission also provides a range of freewheel clutches featuring both sprag and roller ramp technology. Sprag clutches are used in a wide range of safety-critical applications such as keeping riders safe on some of the world’s most thrilling rollercoasters.In a number of locations we also offer service and maintenance from our own teams of engineers. These services can be provided in our own facilities or in the field.Adjusted operating profitAdjusted operating profitReturn on salesReturn on salesEmployees at  31 March 2019Employees at  31 March 2019£3.1m£18.4m8.1%11.2%3501,665READ MORE ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE  OF OUR CHAIN DIVISION ON PAGES 20 AND 21READ MORE ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF OUR  TORQUE TRANSMISSION DIVISION ON PAGES 22 AND 23Renold 2019-AR.indd   222/08/2019   17:27:57OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Our international network includes eight countries where we both manufacture and sell 
and a further ten countries where we have sales companies, strategically located to support 
our customers within our two operating divisions.

Renold employed an average of 2,098 people around the world in the last year, with 54% 
of our staff engaged in direct production activities.

MAP KEY:

 Manufacturing and sales company 
 Sales location 

AMERICAS
Renold Jeffrey and Renold 
Ajax have been well known 
participants in the North 
American markets for many 
years.

Renold Jeffrey manufactures 
conveyor (engineering) chain 
and large pitch chain and sells 
transmission chain sourced 
from elsewhere in the Group.

Renold Ajax focuses on gear 
spindles and other HiTec 
coupling products.

EUROPE
Renold Chain and Renold 
Tooth Chain operate from our 
two European manufacturing 
locations in Germany. Along 
with our European Distribution 
Centre, our UK-based service 
centre and our national sales 
centres, these facilities export 
transmission chain throughout 
Europe and all over the world.

Renold Torque Transmission 
operates two plants in the UK 
exporting a range of gear and 
coupling products globally.

ASIA PACIFIC
We operate manufacturing 
plants in Australia and Malaysia. 
These are supplemented by 
additional sales centres in 
New Zealand, Indonesia and 
Thailand. 

We also operate our own 
distribution networks in 
Australia and Malaysia. We 
sell a wide range of chain and 
torque transmission products.

HIGH GROWTH 
ECONOMIES
Our Chinese chain plant 
primarily serves sister 
companies with a range of 
transmission chains and has 
a smaller, but fast-growing, 
local focus. 

Our Indian business was 
acquired in 2008 and 
manufactures a broad range 
of transmission and conveyor 
chain with 81% of output 
destined for the local market.

41%

of global sales*

38%

of global sales*

10%

of global sales*

8%

of global sales*

* Remaining 3% relates to exports to other territories.

READ MORE ABOUT OUR MARKETPLACE  
ON PAGES 06 AND 07

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   3

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

03

22/08/2019   17:27:57

OVERVIEW

Chairman’s Letter

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN

During the year ended 31 March 2019, Renold 
has continued to make progress in the delivery 
of its strategic plan. The Chain division has 
achieved significant performance improvement 
over the prior year, delivering the highest 
adjusted operating profit within the current 
strategic plan, and possibly ever. Performance 
in the Torque Transmission division was behind 
the prior year level, reflecting a combination of 
expected lower long-term contract revenues, 
a short-term change in product mix affecting 
margin and disappointing profitability in the 
Gears business unit. The combined effect for 
the Group was an increase of 12.4% in adjusted 
operating profit.

Our markets
Overall market conditions remained robust through the year. 
The exceptionally strong growth experienced in the US in the latter 
part of the prior year has stabilised to more sustainable levels. 
Revenue growth in the developing markets of China and India 
continue to out-perform growth rates in more developed markets. 
Strong order intake continued through the year, with orders for the 
full year ahead of revenue (book-to-bill of 102%).

Trading performance
Revenue grew by 5.6% in the year (6.1% on an underlying basis), 
reflecting the combined effects of targeted recovery of material price 
increases alongside organic volume growth. 

Having resolved the issues that depressed the Chain division’s 
performance in the prior year, adjusted return on sales for the 
division improved significantly to 11.2% (2018: 9.6%). 

The Chain division’s improved trading performance is after absorbing 
cost headwinds, particularly German wage costs as a result of union 
and legislative changes.

This is the highest adjusted operating profit delivered by the 
Chain division within the current strategic plan, and beyond this, 
in recent history. While the progress of the plan has been slower 
than originally envisaged, and greater cost headwinds have 
been encountered, I remain certain that our strategic actions are 
improving the underlying quality of the business and will further 
improve margins on a sustainable basis.

Torque Transmission’s adjusted return on sales declined in the year 
to 8.1% (2018: 11.2%). Phasing of revenue on the multi-year couplings 
contract combined with growth in lower margin product areas and 
reduced profitability in the Gears business unit to reduce divisional 
adjusted operating profit.

Adjusted operating profit of £15.4m (2018: £13.7m) increased by 
12.4%. Statutory operating profit was £15.2m (2018: £5.1m).

Historical accounting issues and revised accounts
These 2019 Annual Report and Accounts have been revised under 
s454 of the Companies Act, and in compliance with the requirements 
of this section have been prepared as at the original date of signing 
of 28 May 2019, being the date of approval of the original financial 
statements and not at the date of revision.

The revisions (as set out in more detail in Note 28) have been made to 
correct for the previously announced misstatement of results in the 
Gears business unit which is part of the Torque Transmission division 
for the years ending 31 March 2017, 2018  
and 2019.

A review of the Gears business unit was initially undertaken following 
comments made by the Auditor to the Audit Committee regarding 
application of accounting controls in the business unit at a local 
level. The initial investigation identified intentional misstatement of 
results for the business unit, and as a result the Board immediately 
initiated an independent internal audit investigation, supported by 
PwC, reporting directly to the Audit Committee. These revised Annual 
Report and Accounts, which have been audited by Deloitte LLP with 
a new audit opinion being issued, corrects for the findings of this 
independent investigation, which are outlined in more detail in the 
Finance Director’s Review on pages 24 to 28 and in Notes 27 and 28.

These events have been frustrating and deeply disappointing but the 
Board, in conjunction with the Audit Committee, have acted swiftly to 
fully investigate these matters and will ensure that identified control 
recommendations are implemented.

Step 2020 Strategic Plan
I am pleased to be able to report that we continue to make strong 
progress in delivering key projects in support of the Step 2020 
Strategic Plan.

We have completed the construction of and relocation to our  
new purpose-built Chinese factory in Jintan, near Changzhou in  
Jiangsu province.

We continue with our programme to roll out our chosen suite of 
business systems solutions, including a standard ERP system and 
associated scheduling and engineering packages. Our manufacturing 
efficiency programmes are delivering increased efficiency with sales 
per employee improving by 3.7%.

04

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   4

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:27:58

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Off-setting this positive progress, our health and safety statistics 
have been a disappointment in the year. Despite the improved health 
and safety environment and framework that has been introduced 
as a core element of the strategic plan, an increase in volume at our 
manufacturing sites has coincided with an increase in accidents and 
a deterioration in our health and safety KPIs. Health and safety is a 
core element of our strategic plan and we will redouble our efforts in 
this area to ensure that health and safety performance returns to the 
improving trend that we have experienced in preceding years.

The third element of the Step 2020 Strategic Plan addresses 
acquisitions and the Group’s appetite to grow through selective 
acquisitions. In the November 2018 interim results, we highlighted 
that the Board was considering whether to move the Group’s stock 
exchange listing to AIM. Following consideration by the Board, we 
concluded that such a move would improve the Group’s ability to 
execute transactions, and in April we initiated the first steps of the 
programme to implement the move by calling a General Meeting 
and putting resolutions to shareholders for approval. At the General 
Meeting on 8 May 2019, these resolutions were duly passed with 
an overwhelming vote in support, and we remain on track with the 
timetable outlined in the Circular for the Company’s shares to be 
admitted to trading on AIM on 6 June 2019.

We continue to be committed to the acquisition phase of the strategy 
and consider the move to AIM to be part of the preparations for 
ensuring we are correctly positioned to execute acquisitions as and 
when they arise.

The Board and people
As previously reported, Tim Cooper was appointed to the Board as 
a Non-Executive Director with effect from 14 November 2018 as part 
of a programme of orderly Board succession. It is intended that Tim 
will become Chairman of the Remuneration Committee after he has 
completed 12 months service. To facilitate a smooth handover period, 
Ian Griffith’s term of office as a Non-Executive Director has been 
extended beyond the usual nine-year tenure until the conclusion 
of the 2020 AGM.

The Board continues to support the Executive team in reviewing 
and monitoring key activities under the Step 2020 Strategic Plan. 
The Board remains closely involved in the oversight of the major 
project deliverables and all Board members have continued to give 
additional time and support on a wide range of issues during the year.

On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank all our employees for 
their continued commitment and hard work during the year as we 
progress the Group’s strategy. The contribution of each employee is 
valued and appreciated. 

Debt facilities
In late March 2019, we completed an amendment and extension 
to our core banking facilities, including the Group’s core £61.5m 
revolving credit facility. The revised facilities give access to longer-
term financing which now expires in March 2024 and adds a £20.5m 
accordion facility, permitting an increase in debt if required, for 
example, in support of acquisitions.

The amendment and extension resulted in changes to the banking 
syndicate, which now includes HSBC, Allied Irish Bank (GB) and 
Citibank. We welcome the new lending partners who complement 
Renold’s extensive geographic reach and can support our operations 
across the world.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Pensions
The Group’s net retirement benefit obligations increased to £101.9m 
(2018: £97.4m), with the largest element of the increase relating to 
reducing discount rates and increasing inflation. This increase in the 
net deficit is despite actions that have been implemented in the year 
to realign certain future inflation measures to the consumer prices 
index rather than the retail prices index used historically.

The Group remains committed to progressively de-risking this 
position over time through a combination of agreed contributions to 
the schemes and specific de-risking projects as they become viable.

Future governance
Upon admission to AIM, the Company is required to adopt a 
governance code. The recent changes to the UK Corporate 
Governance Code introduce significant additional requirements that 
are not considered by the Board to be appropriate for a company of 
Renold’s size and resources. Upon admission to AIM, the Company 
proposes to adopt the Corporate Governance Code published by 
the Quoted Companies Alliance. However, as outlined in the recent 
circular proposing the move to AIM, the Directors intend to operate 
the Company’s reporting and governance in substantially the same 
manner as at present.

Dividend
The Board fully recognises the importance of dividends to 
shareholders. However, given the investment in the business in 
the year to March 2019, particularly in the new Chinese facility, 
and the resultant increase in net debt, the Board has decided 
not to recommend the payment of a dividend on ordinary shares for 
the year ended 31 March 2019. This approach will remain under active 
review for future periods.

Annual General Meeting
Whilst references through this document generally refer to the 
original AGM date of 17 July 2019, this meeting was adjourned and 
will be reconvened on 20 September 2019. Further details of the 
reconvened meeting are laid out in the Notice Reconvening Adjourned 
AGM which is available on the Company’s website, www.renold.com.

Summary
A great deal has been accomplished this year, with the Group’s 
financing facilities extended, the move to AIM well progressed,  
and at the same time, delivering record adjusted operating margins in  
the Chain division whilst increasing Group adjusted operating profit 
by 12.4%.

There still remains a great deal of work yet to be done, but we believe 
the actions delivered this year provide the platform to progress the 
strategic plan further.

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

05

22/08/2019   17:27:58

Renold 2019-AR.indd   5

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

26945  22 August 2019 5:26 pm  Proof 4STRATEGIC REPORTRenold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 201906Market  ReviewThe Chain division has eight production facilities and a further local presence in ten countries, strategically placed to serve our customers on a global basis. In Torque Transmission we operate a number of specialised niche businesses that produce and sell a range of specialist products in both the industrial couplings and industrial gear markets. The key elements of our market proposition are common across both divisions: technical excellence, value-adding innovative product ranges and exceptional quality.Global presence – local marketsRenold continues to benefit from its presence in a wide spread of geographic markets and even wider range of diverse end-user applications across a myriad of industry sectors.Our global manufacturing footprint not only enables the business to control product specification and quality, but positions us well to service customers with a rapid response in both our traditional geographic territories and within emerging markets. For example, our facilities in India, China and Malaysia combine to offer an excellent platform for growth in Asia while also supporting established markets in Europe, the Americas and Australasia.Our global sales and distribution network is designed to offer local commercial support and rapid delivery, ensuring that we meet our customers’ exacting specifications. It also enables the aggregation of overall demand to drive economies of scale within our factories. While engineering and product development is coordinated globally, local support teams ensure that we are able to rapidly understand and provide solutions for customers’ often technically challenging power transmission and conveying applications.End-user marketsPower transmission products are used within an extremely broad spread of applications. With a very diverse and numerically large customer base, Renold’s reliance on any single customer is relatively low. Our biggest global customer represents 5% of sales. Of our five largest customers, two are themselves distributors of a wide range of industrial power transmission equipment and thus even this limited concentration of our sales is effectively sub-segmented into a huge range of end customers.Similarly, the business enjoys little reliance on any one particular industry with sales spread across most general industrial markets such as construction machinery, material handling, transportation, mining and quarrying, food processing, energy production, agriculture, leisure and many more.The chart demonstrates the spread of revenue across a wide range of end-customer markets. However, the data only includes 57% of Renold’s revenue as the remaining 43% is supplied by Renold to distributor customers. These distributors will in turn supply products to their end-customers who are likely to further diversify the end-customer base into which Renold’s products are supplied.REVENUE BY SECTORManufactured productsOtherMaterial handlingConstruction  machineryFood and drinkAgriculture, forestry  and fishingEnergyTransportationMining and  quarryingEnvironmental18.4%21.3%12.5%5.5%5.4%7.4%5.0%4.2%1.8%18.5%KEY= 5%REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHYEUROPE37.8%Other Europe – 17.7%Germany – 9.2%UK – 7.4%France – 3.5%AMERICASUSA – 34.1%Canada – 4.6%Other Americas – 2.6%41.3%OTHERAustralasia – 9.6%India – 4.2%China – 4.1%Other – 3.0%20.9%The Americas accounted for a larger share of Group revenue in the year ended 31 March 2019 following a year of strong growth, particularly in the USA. European revenue has continued to grow progressively, and the developing economies of China and India have continued to deliver strong growth.GEOGRAPHIC TRENDSRenold is a leading manufacturer and distributor of power transmission products and operates as two separate divisions: Chain and Torque Transmission.Renold 2019-AR.indd   622/08/2019   17:27:5826945  22 August 2019 5:26 pm  Proof 4OVERVIEWSTRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONwww.renold.com Stock code: RNO07Routes to marketIn order to successfully target the diverse end-customer sectors, Renold goes to market through three main customer channels: •Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); •Distributors; and  •End users.This combined approach provides options to our end-user customers to identify and select Renold products in a way that most optimally aligns to their business model.Customers in this segment typically value the technical expertise that Renold can bring to bear in providing solutions to increasingly demanding applications as their own products are developed. An example of this are our gearbox solutions provided by the Torque Transmission division to lower volume manufacturers of original equipment. In instances where, due to size or specification requirements, standard products are not suitable, Renold is able to design a solution which becomes integral to the equipment design.In the year ended 31 March 2019, 36% (2018: 38%) of revenue was through the OEM channel.The sophistication and reach of distributor networks varies greatly around the world. In India, for example, distributors are generally small, single-site operations, or small local networks. They provide a local inventory holding for standard products. At the opposite end of the scale are the large national US distribution networks who are able to provide both standard products across a very broad product range and are also able to develop, along with their supply chain partners, specialist solutions for customers.In the year ended 31 March 2019, 42% (2018: 43%) of revenue was through the distributor channel.While not always a well-defined category, end-user demand is generally to support larger and more complex service and MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul) applications where customers gain value from dealing direct.In the year ended 31 March 2019, 22% (2018: 19%) of revenue was through the end-user channel.READ MORE ABOUT OUR PERFORMANCE  ON PAGES 20 TO 23Macroeconomic conditions remained robust within our core geographic markets, with certain regions continuing to recover from the depressed levels of previous years.Industrial goods markets have experienced price inflation in raw materials and have required sales price increases and manufacturing efficiencies in order to protect margins.The combined effect of organic volume growth and sales price increases has delivered underlying revenue growth of 6.1% in the year ended 31 March 2019.MARKET SUMMARY22%of revenue36%of revenue42%of revenueOEMsDistributionEnd usersREAD MORE ABOUT OUR PERFORMANCE  ON PAGES 20 TO 23Renold 2019-AR.indd   722/08/2019   17:28:01STRATEGIC REPORT

Business 
Model

The Renold business model is focused on leveraging the unique 
knowledge and capabilities of our people and facilities to generate 
value for our stakeholders. The continuous value-generation cycle 
that underpins our strategy is shown below.

Our key resources

Our value-generation cycle

People

We are building a strong, highly skilled team with a clear set of values 
and stretching targets. Our approach combines new skills for existing 
staff and new capabilities from recruits.

Facilities

We are upgrading our infrastructure and process capability to be 
an appropriate match for our strategic goals. This will support 
improvements in quality and service and create manufacturing flexibility.

Relationships

We work in long-term collaboration with a wide range of general 
and specialist suppliers. This supports our ability to source complex 
materials for our leading-edge solutions.

Knowledge – of customers, problems,  
products and solutions

 •

 •

 •

Reviewing after-sales service means we continue to 
learn and deliver.

Deep understanding of metallurgy and  
chemistry in real world scenarios.

Practical application of engineering excellence.

Skills and facilities – the ability to conceive  
and deliver these solutions

 •

 •

Bringing our unparalleled engineering capability to 
design customer solutions.

Deploying over 100 years of manufacturing know-
how to create superior products.

 • Manufacturing capability in most major regions.

Logistics – the right product in the right  
place at the right time

 • Wide range of stocked products can reduce 

 •

 •

supply chain complexity.

Daily shipment options respond 
to customer-specific needs.

Rapid response cells geared up for  
swift deliveries.

Service – unique after-sales service means  
we continue to learn and deliver

 •

 •

 •

After-sales service centres and product 
performance monitoring.

Rapid response offering on standard configured 
chain and standard  transmission chain.

Getting closer to customers in more locations.

08

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   8

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:03

26945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4OVERVIEWSTRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONwww.renold.com Stock code: RNO09DistributionEnd usersOEMsOur shareholdersOur partnersOur employeesOur business model creates value for our customers......and for our stakeholders •Range of facilities and capabilities •Bespoke solutions •Meeting their own customer needs •The Renold brand and  engineering capability36% of sales •Expert knowledge •Bespoke solutions •Unique problems understood  and solved •The Renold brand and  engineering capability22% of sales •Trust and customer support •Reliability •Access to broad product range •The Renold brand and  engineering capability42% of salesREAD ABOUT OUR PEOPLE ON PAGES 40 AND 41 •A long-term relationship  •A collaborative process •We have a detailed  strategy for growth •Development of talent  •The ability to work  for a business whose  values align with those  of the employeeREAD ABOUT OUR CUSTOMER  JOURNEY ON PAGES 10 AND 11READ MORE ABOUT OUR SUSTAINABILITY  ON PAGES 38 TO 45Renold 2019-AR.indd   922/08/2019   17:28:0626945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4STRATEGIC REPORTRenold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 201910Sales channels10Bringing our unparalleledengineering capability todesign customer solutions  We have deep knowledge of the performance characteristics of a number of metals and surface treatments  Enhancing the customerexperience with after-sales service and performance monitoringMaterial performancecan be enhanced withthe right coating Ongoing performance monitoring, field support and technical adviceCustomer issues are often challenging and sometimes uniqueMANUFACTURINGWAREHOUSEWide range of stocked products and daily shipment options  Heat treatment and other applications to optimise performanceSpecifying the right grade and composition of metals is keyAutomated assembly processes reduce lead timesTreatingcomponents6Assemblingcomponents7Shipping824Materialspecification3Coatingspecification4Design2After-salesservice9Makingcomponents5Deploying over 100 yearsof manufacturing know-howto create superior productsHeat treatment expertise is a key competency in many locationsAnalysingcustomerproblems  1SERVICE111ENGINEERING CENTRE1KNOWLEDGESKILLS & FACILITIESSERVICELOGISTICSOur Customer JourneyOur activities range from diagnosing our customers’ specific power transmission application challenges, to proposing the right material solutions, to formulating their often complex properties, to cutting and heat treating the components and finally to assembling the  finished product.Renold 2019-AR.indd   1022/08/2019   17:28:0626945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4OVERVIEWSTRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONwww.renold.com Stock code: RNO11Sales channels10Bringing our unparalleledengineering capability todesign customer solutions  We have deep knowledge of the performance characteristics of a number of metals and surface treatments  Enhancing the customerexperience with after-sales service and performance monitoringMaterial performancecan be enhanced withthe right coating Ongoing performance monitoring, field support and technical adviceCustomer issues are often challenging and sometimes uniqueMANUFACTURINGWAREHOUSEWide range of stocked products and daily shipment options  Heat treatment and other applications to optimise performanceSpecifying the right grade and composition of metals is keyAutomated assembly processes reduce lead timesTreatingcomponents6Assemblingcomponents7Shipping824Materialspecification3Coatingspecification4Design2After-salesservice9Makingcomponents5Deploying over 100 yearsof manufacturing know-howto create superior productsHeat treatment expertise is a key competency in many locationsAnalysingcustomerproblems  1SERVICE111ENGINEERING CENTRE1KNOWLEDGESKILLS & FACILITIESSERVICELOGISTICSWe add value during our customer journey from our unrivalled engineering capability, 100+ years of know-how on solving power transmission challenges and enhanced after-sales service. KEYRenold 2019-AR.indd   1122/08/2019   17:28:06STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategy

ROBERT PURCELL
CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Our three phase  
strategic plan...

PHASE 3 ACQUISITIONS

The market for industrial chain remains highly fragmented across geographic and sector 
niches. Acquisitions have the potential to deliver value from:

 •

 •
 •

Accessing incremental growth opportunities in new product sectors or new end-
user markets

Providing routes to new geographic markets for Renold’s existing product range

Consolidating volume into facilities with efficient business processes and efficient 
manufacturing capabilities

Renold has the underlying characteristics to make the Group a natural consolidator in 
the industrial chain market. Our reputation, broad product range and geographic reach 
provide a strong foundation for integration.

PHASE 2 ORGANIC GROWTH

Renold has strong market share in certain geographic 
markets and product categories. However, the 
fragmented nature of the power transmission market 
and the diversity of end-user markets creates significant 
opportunities for organic growth.

IMPROVING OUR SALES AND MARKETING
We are targeting specific end-user markets where 
growth opportunities can help to mitigate the cyclicality 
experienced in industrial markets. Through direct 
interaction with our end-customers, we will reinforce 
our reputation for quality engineering solutions and high 
performance products.

ENHANCED CUSTOMER SERVICE
Historical levels of customer service have not been at 
sufficiently high standards and have not matched our 
reputation for product quality. Throughout our Step 2 
Service programme, we are working to evolve and 
enhance our service offer for standard products and 
for highly engineered bespoke solutions.

PHASE 1 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT

Restructuring is the area of greatest progress to date since the 
commencement of the Step 2020 Strategic Plan in 2013. While many 
projects have been successfully implemented, numerous opportunities 
remain to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

OPTIMISE BUSINESS PROCESSES
We aim to deliver business processes with the same degree of flexibility 
that we are targeting for our operations. By implementing simple, 
repeatable and standardised business processes, we will lower our costs.

RIGHT-SIZE OUR COST BASE AND IMPROVE  
MANUFACTURING EFFICIENCY
We aim to enhance flexibility of existing capacity through enhanced 
automation, leading to a direct improvement in variable and net margins.

IMPROVE OUR PRODUCT MARGINS
We aim to achieve appropriate value for the highly technical products 
we offer to the market.

MAKE THE RIGHT HIRES TO DRIVE GROWTH
We will invest in our people to enable them to match the performance of 
our enhanced manufacturing and business processes. In some cases, this 
will involve new talent and ideas being brought into the business.

12

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   12

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:07

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Our three phase  

strategic plan...

... is being implemented through our staircases...

Business  
process 
efficiency

Manufacturing 
efficiency

Commercial 
positioning

Corporate 
efficiency

Growth  
activities

... to deliver our strategic objectives...

SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVING OUR HEALTH AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE

GENERATING MARGIN-ENHANCING GROWTH FROM OUR SUPERIOR PRODUCT CAPABILITY

ENHANCING CUSTOMER SERVICE

OPTIMISING BUSINESS PROCESSES

LOWERING OUR BREAKEVEN POINT

DEVELOPING OUR PEOPLE

STRENGTHENING AND DE-RISKING OUR BALANCE SHEET

... in support of our strategic goal

TO DELIVER MID-TEENS NET OPERATING MARGINS THROUGH A 
COMBINATION OF RESTRUCTURING THE GROUP, DELIVERING ORGANIC 
GROWTH AND COMPLETING VALUE-ENHANCING ACQUISITIONS

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   13

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

13

22/08/2019   17:28:07

STRATEGIC REPORT

Chief Executive’s Review

ROBERT PURCELL
CHIEF EXECUTIVE

I am pleased to be able to report a 
performance in the year that has delivered 
revenue growth combined with improved 
margins, two of our key strategic objectives.

Overview
We have been working diligently on improving performance for 
a number of years as part of the strategic plan. This has involved 
major restructuring projects such as factory moves and closures, 
but has also been focused on attention to detail in manufacturing 
processes and commercial capabilities. Our ability to demonstrate 
the benefits of these actions in financial results has been limited 
over the last few years by wider market issues. However, as revenue 
growth has been achieved, the benefit of the actions implemented 
has become visible and is reflected in the improvement in adjusted 
operating profit margins.

Margin improvement in the year to 31 March 2019 has been focused 
in the Chain division where underlying adjusted operating profit 
margins increased to 11.2% (2018: 9.6%). These margins have been 
delivered despite a number of headwinds, including the impact 
of German wage inflation following union and legislative change 
and a temporary reduction in profitability of our Chinese Chain 
operations as we delivered the major factory move. This margin 
improvement, along with further capacity for improvement 
in a number of areas, demonstrates the potential for further 
increases in margin as we continue with our strategic initiatives.

Performance of the Torque Transmission division has been more 
challenging and the operating profit margin achieved in the year is 
a disappointment, compounded by the identification of accounting 
issues in the Gears business unit. However, divisional performance 
masks a number of underlying improvements, particularly in the US 
and in continued strength of order intake, which give me confidence 
that performance should improve in the coming year.

Group revenue grew by 6.1% to £202.4m on an underlying basis, 
returning towards previous peak levels. Adjusted operating profit 
increased by 12.4% to £15.4m (2018: £13.7m). 

Group order intake remained robust through the year, with total 
orders growing by 5.5% on an underlying basis, and adjusted to 
remove the impact of the major, multi-year contract won by Couplings 
in the prior year. The Group’s closing order book at 31 March 2019 is 
8.0% ahead of the prior year on an underlying basis.

Step 2020 Strategic Plan – update on progress

PHASE 1 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT 

Manufacturing efficiency
As noted above, we have been working diligently on improving 
production efficiency as part of the strategic plan. As growth has 
delivered a recovery in revenue to levels previously experienced in 
the year ended 31 March 2015, the benefits of the strategic actions 
are becoming visible. For the Chain division, particular improvement 
is apparent in the margins being achieved in Chain Americas and 
in India, with both being able to support the growing volumes with 
limited additional resources as improvement programmes delivered 
cost efficiencies and increased productivity. Chain Europe has also 
been able to support growth with limited additional resources; 
however, the impact of German labour cost inflation has constrained 
margin improvement.

14

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   14

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:08

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A further temporary constraint on margin improvement was 
experienced, as anticipated, due to the reduced production output 
of Chain China as we transferred to the new factory. We previously 
outlined our programme to relocate the Chinese chain manufacturing 
facility to a purpose-built facility near Changzhou in Jiangsu province. 
This significant factory move was completed in the latter part of the 
year, following two years of planning and construction. This new 
facility is now fully operational and was delivered on time and ahead 
of the deadline of 31 March 2019. The trading performance of this 
business unit was impacted in the final quarter of the year as the 
entire operation was relocated and a substantially new workforce 
went through a ‘learning curve’.

In order to deliver manufacturing efficiencies, one area of focus 
during the year was on planning and scheduling systems across the 
Group. As volumes increased in certain business units, the capacity 
of their legacy processes to effectively support this growth was 
proved to be inadequate. As a result, we have accelerated the roll-
out of scheduling systems and processes in some areas, supporting 
improved service.

Over the last five years, we have invested in a number of capital 
projects aimed at improving existing facilities and adding new 
manufacturing capabilities and technologies. These initiatives have 
improved reliability and efficiency, allowing us to reduce costs, 
while at the same time enhance product quality and service levels. 
There remains significant scope for further investment in projects 
with attractive financial returns and we will continue to invest in a 
disciplined manner, ahead of depreciation, to deliver these.

On a more disappointing note, based on our KPIs, health and 
safety performance deteriorated in the year. The health and safety 
programmes which have been implemented as a core part of the 
strategic plan remain appropriate and provide the framework to 
ensure improved performance. As the sites become busier, we will 
continue to refine and develop our processes and procedures defined 
by the health and safety framework to ensure that our performance 
in this area is on an improving trend.

Business process efficiency 
The most significant element of the programme to improve business 
process efficiency is the implementation of the Group’s ERP and 
associated business systems across all its sites. Progress continues 
and the new Chinese factory and sales office are now operating 
on the new systems. The preparation of the roll-out to India is well 
progressed, but was ultimately delayed as we elected to reduce the 
risk exposure of changing systems in both China and India at the 
same time. India is expected to go live on the new systems early in 
the new financial year.

This time last year, I outlined the launch of our Step 2 Service 
programme which is focused on improving customer service. 
Customer service has been a long-standing achilles heel for Renold, 
and the programme is delivering initial improvements. However, 
there remains more to do to deliver exceptional service to customers 
at all times, and our management teams around the Group are 
assessing all aspects of their business processes to identify and 
improve processes that can enhance customer service.

PHASE 2 ORGANIC GROWTH

Growth activities
Over the last few years, Renold has been restructuring and 
strengthening the commercial and sales teams around the world. 
This has provided a platform for growth, which, in the year ended 
31 March 2019, comprised a combination of pricing and volume 
growth. Following the step-change increases in raw material prices 
experienced in the year ended 31 March 2018, sales price increases 
were implemented, providing benefit in the second half of the year to 
31 March 2018 and in the year ended 31 March 2019. Volume-driven 
organic growth has been particularly strong in the US markets, across 
both Chain and Torque Transmission divisions.

Underlying revenue growth was sustained throughout the year with 
6.4% delivered for the first half, and 5.7% for the second half, resulting 
in underlying growth for the year of 6.1%.

Renold’s brand recognition and engineering capability are key 
differentiators in the market and enable us to focus on premium 
performance segments and applications with complex and 
challenging requirements. As such, we continue to target non-
traditional sectors where we believe Renold’s products can provide 
a differentiated offering and where we can reduce our exposure to 
the cyclicality of core industrial markets. We are seeing continued 
progress from this approach in growth markets such as logistics and 
ports and anticipate further benefits in the future.

Commercial positioning
We have been working towards product standardisation for some 
time. This programme has further future potential, and in the 
year to 31 March 2019, we delivered measurable success from the 
programme. As part of the relocation of the Chinese factory, our 
Indian facility provided identical specification chain to that normally 
manufactured in China. This capability ensured continued supply 
during the factory move, preventing any customer service issues, but 
also providing an element of de-risking to the factory transfer. This is 
part of an ongoing programme to increase manufacturing flexibility 
at our sites, and to ensure that we provide a consistent Renold 
specification and Renold quality, independently of where the product 
is made.

I referred to our Step 2 Service programme earlier under the 
manufacturing efficiency heading. Ultimately, Step 2 Service is 
focused on ensuring that our customer service is befitting of Renold’s 
premium position in the market. As we use this programme to 
diagnose process issues and improve customer experience, we are 
focusing on ensuring that we get the basics right. This is drawing 
together root causes from a number of business areas, and driving 
a culture change across the organisation. Solutions are often simple, 
but require a consistent approach from all areas of the business to 
deliver improvement.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   15

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

15

22/08/2019   17:28:08

STRATEGIC REPORT

Chief Executive’s Review

Outlook
The Chain division has delivered encouraging organic growth as well 
as improved operational efficiency, increasing adjusted operating 
profit to record levels. The continued successful execution of the 
strategic plan has enabled margin improvement to be delivered in 
spite of labour cost inflation and the significant relocation of our 
Chinese factory, which will take time to ramp up to targeted output 
and productivity levels. We are mindful of these factors entering the 
new year, but remain confident that our strategic objectives provide 
us with a clear pathway to further future progress.

While not immediately visible in the trading performance in the year 
to March 2019, the operational improvements in Torque Transmission, 
along with additional revenue from the Couplings long-term contract 
in the year ahead, provide a platform for further organic growth and 
margin improvement.

Our strategy has delivered strong results and is the optimum 
approach to creating and maintaining a higher quality, higher 
margin business. Robust order books provide the basis for 
continued improvement in the new financial year. We see significant 
opportunity to build on the platform established, both through 
ongoing organic growth initiatives and through an effective 
acquisition strategy, the execution of which will be simplified by the 
move to AIM. Delivering sustainable growth through these initiatives, 
when combined with the benefits of further operational efficiency, 
continues to support the expectation that mid-teens operating 
margins can be delivered over time.

ROBERT PURCELL
CHIEF EXECUTIVE

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

PHASE 3 ACQUISITIONS

Acquisitions remain a core component of our strategic plan. 
Acquisitions that can deliver growth or enhance margin, either 
through access to new markets and products or through 
consolidation of production, have the potential to deliver value while 
reinforcing Renold’s reputation as a leading global supplier of chain 
and torque transmission products.

The organic initiatives implemented in respect of the first two 
phases of the strategic plan have created a stronger platform from 
which to pursue acquisitions. Our improved commercial structures 
and processes have given us greater insight and clarity as to the 
most strategically attractive opportunities for consolidation in our 
established markets and expansion into complimentary markets 
and product areas. Furthermore, we are confident our operational 
platform, following the restructuring and efficiency investments 
made, will enable us to integrate acquired businesses effectively 
and realise the financial and strategic synergy potential these 
would bring.

The objective of moving Renold’s stock exchange listing to AIM is to 
ensure we have the flexibility to execute transactions more quickly, 
more cost effectively and with greater certainty.

We are pursuing acquisition opportunities although, by their nature, 
the timing of acquisitions is unpredictable and is dependent upon 
availability of suitable targets. We have clear acquisition criteria by 
which we will measure opportunities as they arise.

Macroeconomic landscape and Brexit
There are a number of well-publicised macroeconomic risks, but 
due to the lack of certainty as to whether or how these risks will 
crystallise, we continue to deliver our strategy, cognisant of the risks, 
but similarly very aware that these should not delay our progress.

In Europe, the Brexit process creates uncertainty for Renold and 
for our customers. However, with only 7% of our Group revenues 
generated in the UK and with the majority of export sales from our 
UK Torque Transmission plants to non-European destinations, we do 
not believe that we are overly exposed to risk in this area.

In the US, which represents 34% of Group revenue, the threat of 
increased tariff restrictions has the potential to disrupt the markets 
in which we operate. However, Renold’s US markets have remained 
robust despite the tariffs already introduced. The additional costs, 
either directly or indirectly related to the tariffs, have been passed 
on to customers in increased sales prices. While we cannot predict 
future changes, our operating model includes US-manufactured 
product combined with imports of products from other global Renold 
manufacturing locations. As a result, we have flexibility to adjust 
our manufacturing strategy and adapt our approach if required in 
response to longer-term changes in the competitive environment.

16

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   16

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:08

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Progress with Strategic Objectives

Strategic 
Objective

A

SIGNIFICANTLY 
IMPROVING OUR 
HEALTH AND SAFETY 
PERFORMANCE

B

GENERATING MARGIN- 
ENHANCING GROWTH 
FROM OUR SUPERIOR 
PRODUCT CAPABILITY

C

ENHANCING 
CUSTOMER SERVICE

D

OPTIMISING BUSINESS 
PROCESSES

E

LOWERING OUR 
BREAKEVEN POINT

F

DEVELOPING OUR 
PEOPLE

G

STRENGTHENING 
AND DE-RISKING OUR 
BALANCE SHEET

CHANGE

KPI measures
(see pages 18 and 19)

Progress in 2018/19

 •
 •
 •
 •

 •
 •

Lost time accident frequency rate

Reportable injury rate

Lost time days

Safety improvements

Return on sales

Adjusted EPS

Health and safety remains our top priority and a huge 
amount of activity has delivered the progress experienced 
in the years to 31 March 2018. In spite of this activity, our 
KPIs have worsened considerably in the year to 31 March 
2019 as accident rates have increased. This re-emphasises 
the point that there is never the capacity for complacency 
in health and safety, and we will redouble our efforts to 
ensure the culture and operating practises create a safe 
environment for all to operate within.

The performance of the Chain division has demonstrated 
the potential for margin improvement delivered by organic 
growth. This improvement is despite the cost headwinds 
encountered in German labour costs, and the significant 
factory move delivered in the year.

Customer service improvements remain key to supporting 
future organic growth. Historically, customer service has 
been a weak point of the Renold offering. The progress 
being delivered through Renold’s ‘Step 2 Service’ 
programme is starting to resolve some deeply embedded 
attitudes and cultures. Management continues to focus  
on operational improvement as a route to supporting 
future growth.

 •

Sales per employee

The Chain division has delivered strong underlying revenue 
growth, through a more efficient manufacturing capability, 
delivering operational efficiency and improved profitability.

 •

Total overheads

Overheads grew in the year, in support of revenue growth. 
As a result, our breakeven point has increased.

The Group has continued to review and strengthen 
the management team and organisation structures. 
We continue to invest in future leaders and apprentices 
to ensure the continuity and stability into the future.

 •
 •
 •
 •

Cost of servicing legacy pensions

Average working capital ratio

Leverage ratio

Net debt

Working capital increased in the year as we increased 
inventory in support of improved customer service. 
Investment in the new Chinese factory increased 
our operating assets employed. The combined result 
was an increase in net debt, although the leverage 
ratio was almost unchanged.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   17

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

17

22/08/2019   17:28:08

26945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4STRATEGIC REPORTRenold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 201918Our Key Performance IndicatorsWhy it’s important to RenoldSafety is our number one priority. We believe that every work-related incident and injury is preventable and are committed to  providing a safe workplaceOur financial and non-financial key performance indicators (KPIs) provide a measure of  our performance against the key drivers of our strategy. Their relevance to our strategy and our performance against these measures are explained on these pages.STRATEGIC OBJECTIVESA  Significantly improving our health  and safety performanceB  Generating margin-enhancing growth  from our superior product capabilityC Enhancing customer serviceD Optimising business processesE Lowering our breakeven pointF Developing our peopleG  Strengthening and de-risking  our balance sheetCHANGE KEY  KPI result is an improvement on the prior year KPI result is unchanged from the prior year KPI result is a deterioration on the prior year  Lost time accident frequency ratesSafety improvementsLost time daysReportable  injury ratesCommentaryLost time accidents increased during the year. PerformanceCommentaryReportable injuries (greater than three days lost time) increased during the year.PerformanceCommentaryLost time days increased as a number of accidents had long recovery times. CommentaryThe number of safety Improvements increased  over 2018.PerformancePerformanceChange Change Change Change Definition: Over a 12-month period, this ratio shows the total number of lost time accidents, irrespective of severity, against the hours worked. An internationally recognised standard measureDefinition: Over a 12-month period this ratio shows the number of accidents greater than three lost days, against the average number of employees in the same period.  An internationally recognised standard measureDefinition: The total number of  lost days attributable to all accidents in the 12-month period.  An internationally recognised standard measureDefinition: We drive all our sites to capture and implement safety improvements. An internationally recognised concept with different measures applied by different businessesHealth & safety measuresA7.020167.120175.8201815.2201915.620158872016777201745520181,90920192,06020153082016190201724820181,126201980620151,23320161,46620171,30420181,35020191,7232015READ MORE ABOUT OUR STRATEGY ON PAGES 12 AND 13Renold 2019-AR.indd   1822/08/2019   17:28:0826945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4OVERVIEWSTRATEGIC REPORTGOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONwww.renold.com Stock code: RNO19Why it’s important to RenoldCapital and cash measures reflect how we are managing our cash and balance sheet. A strong balance sheet is essential to remaining robust through the economic cycle and creating the ability to deliver appropriate shareholder returns.Capital and cash measuresProfit measuresCommentaryCost of servicing legacy pensions remained constant during the year.CommentaryAverage working capital increased as inventory holdings increased in support of improved customer service.CommentaryNet debt increased as we Invested, but leverage remains low at 1.3x. CommentaryIncreases in working capital and investment in China resulted in an increase in the debt.PerformancePerformancePerformancePerformanceChange Change Change Change Definition: Annual cash contributions to closed legacy defined benefit pension schemes, including associated administrative costs. The goal is to maintain stability and certainty of cash costsDefinition: Working capital as a ratio of rolling 12 month revenue. Calculated as a simple average of the previous 12 monthsDefinition: Ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA. ‘Banking’ leverage means the figure reflects our banking agreements which differ from IFRS (e.g. preference shares are debt in IFRS but ignored in our banking agreement)Definition: Total borrowing less cash balancesCost of servicing legacy pensions (£m)Net debt (£m)Leverage ratioAverage working capital ratio (%)Return on sales (%)Total overheads* (£m)Sales per employee (£000) Adjusted earnings per share (p)Efficiency measures5.320166.020175.520185.520195.32015201622%22%2017201823%201919%19%20151.1x20160.8x20171.1x20181.3x20190.9x201523.5201617.4201724.3201830.3201919.52015BDEWhy it’s important to RenoldProfit measures give insight into cost management, performance efficiency and growth. We are focused on increasing productivity, reducing operating costs and delivering organic growth.Why it’s important to RenoldDelivering improved efficiency in everything we do is a core element of our strategic goal of delivering mid-teens operating margins.CommentaryIncreased profitability combined with revenue growth helped return on sales recover to 7.6%. CommentaryAdjusted earnings per share increased by 4.7% as a result of increased profitability, CommentaryUnderlying revenue growth of 6.1% was delivered with headcount only up by 2.4%. CommentaryTotal overheads increased by 1.5% in support of underlying revenue which increased by 6.1%.PerformancePerformancePerformancePerformanceChange Change Change Change Definition: Adjusted operating profit divided by revenueDefinition: Earnings per share before restructuring costs or adjusting items. This is a key metric used by capital markets and stakeholders in assessing performance improvement and value generationDefinition: Total revenue divided by the average number of employees.  A simple way to assess the efficiency of our business processesDefinition: Costs that are, in theory, fixed or very inflexible. Driving these down is one way to lower our breakeven point and to enhance our operational gearing 8.6%20167.4%20177.2%20187.6%20198.5%20154.7p20164.2p20174.3p20184.5p201920155.0p82.8201684.2201793.1201896.5201989.2201570.7201674.2201774.5201875.6201974.32015DEFG* Overheads increased by c.£3.0m following acquisition of Tooth Chain in late FY16.Renold 2019-AR.indd   1922/08/2019   17:28:09STRATEGIC REPORT

Our Performance: 
Chain

Renold Chain is a global market-leading supplier of differentiated and value-added chain 
products for a wide variety of end-use applications. We create innovative solutions for our 
customers and the Renold name is known for industry-leading design and specification, high 
quality and technical support. Reducing total cost of ownership is important to our customers, 
with extended product life and reduced maintenance key factors in specifying our products.

Chain performance review

Revenue
Foreign exchange
Underlying revenue
Adjusted operating profit
Foreign exchange
Underlying adjusted operating profit
Statutory operating profit

2019
£m
163.9
–
163.9
18.4
–
18.4
15.3

2018
£m
153.1
(0.7)
152.4
14.7
(0.1)
14.6
7.8

The Chain division delivered strong performance in the year as 
organic growth was delivered alongside operational improvements. 
The raw material cost increases experienced in the prior year have 
been passed on successfully and have combined with organic 
volume growth and improved operational effectiveness to enhance 
performance. As a result, the division delivered the highest adjusted 
operating profit in recent history. This performance is in spite of 
certain cost headwinds, most notably labour costs in Germany 
following legislative and union-driven changes.

Underlying revenue of £163.9m was £11.5m (7.5%) ahead of the prior 
year. Stronger macroeconomic conditions and sales price increases 
have combined with an enhanced commercial team and improved 
levels of customer service to deliver organic revenue growth across 
all Chain regions. While regional performance has varied, growth for 
the division as a whole increased through the year with underlying 
revenue growth of 8.0% in the second half of the year compared 
with 7.1% for the first half.

European revenue growth accelerated through the year with 
underlying growth of 3.1% in the first half of the year, increasing to 
7.7% in the second half. The acceleration resulted from price increases 
in the first half of the year being supplemented in the second half with 
volume growth. Underlying revenue growth for the year was 5.4%.

In the Americas, the improving demand experienced in the latter 
part of the prior year continued during the year ended 31 March 2019, 
with an underlying revenue increase of 11.3%. This level of growth 
reflects not only improvements in the underlying US market, but 
also Renold’s improved ability to access this market demand through 
increased product and sector focus. 

In Australasia, underlying revenue growth for the year as a whole 
was marginal. However, this reflects an underlying revenue decline 
in the first half of the year of 5.6% off-set by growth of 6.3% in the 
second half. This largely reflects volatility in revenues in our South-
East Asia regions of Malaysia and Indonesia. 

20

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   20

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:11

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

UNDERLYING REVENUE (£m)
£163.9m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

144.7
146.5

152.4

155.3

163.9

UNDERLYING ADJUSTED 
OPERATING MARGIN (%)
11.2%
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

11.6%
9.6%

11.2%

10.7%

12.5%

Domestic revenues in India grew strongly with underlying revenue growth of 13.3%. 
In addition, and as a result of our strategic product standardisation programme, 
India, for the first time, supplied other Group companies with a specification of chain 
that would normally be supplied from our Chinese factory. This mitigated the risk of 
disruption as we moved our Chinese factory, but also demonstrates the manufacturing 
flexibility benefits being delivered by this programme. 

Growth in domestic Chinese revenues was subdued in the year as we relocated the 
factory. In spite of this, underlying revenue grew by 7.0%, albeit from a low absolute base.

Underlying order intake of £165.5m was up by £7.5m (4.7%) on the previous year. 
At a regional level, European underlying order intake increased by 4.5%, and orders 
remain ahead of revenue for the year. In the Americas, following particularly strong 
growth in the year to 31 March 2018, underlying order intake grew at a more 
sustainable 4.5%. Order intake in Australasia followed a similar trend to revenue and 
was marginally up by 1.1%. Order intake increased by 22.1% in China and 8.1% in India. 
Total orders for the year finished £1.6m (1.0%) ahead of sales.

Contribution margin, the margin after all variable production costs, fell by 49bps 
(as a percentage of revenue), with the most significant cost increase relating to direct 
labour. Underlying revenue per employee improved by 3.6% demonstrating improved 
labour productivity from the various programmes underway. However, the cost 
headwind largely resulted from union and legislation-driven labour rate inflation in 
Germany, which was sufficient to more than off-set these productivity gains. Steel 
prices were more stable than in the prior year, although specific factors, such as US 
steel tariffs, continue to create distortions in the market.

The combined effect of these movements was the delivery of the highest revenue by 
the Chain division since the commencement of the strategic plan at the highest adjusted 
operating profit margin of 11.2% (2018: 9.6%). 

Summary
The Chain division made strong progress in the year and is delivering the best results 
in recent times. Despite the cost headwinds being encountered, the division continues 
to progress, with further opportunity to improve margins.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   21

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

21

22/08/2019   17:28:13

STRATEGIC REPORT

Our Performance: 
Torque Transmission

Renold Torque Transmission is an international manufacturer of high integrity torque 
transmitting products. Renold’s products are integral, but generally unseen, in different facets 
of daily life from gearboxes driving heavy duty, high rise escalators in London and New York 
subway systems to shaft couplings in industrial applications across the world.

Torque Transmission performance review

Revenue
Foreign exchange
Underlying revenue
Adjusted operating profit
Foreign exchange
Underlying adjusted operating profit
Statutory operating profit

2019
£m
38.5
–
38.5
3.1
–
3.1
3.1

2018
(restated1)
£m
38.5
(0.1)
38.4
4.3
0.1
4.4
4.1

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Adjusted operating profit for the Torque Transmission division has 
been revised downwards by £1.0m for the year to 31 March 2019 and 
restated downwards by £0.5m for the year to 31 March 2018 as a 
result of the accounting issues identified in the Gears business unit. 
Further details of these adjustments are outlined later in this report 
and in the Finance Director’s Report on page 24.

Underlying external revenue of £38.5m was largely unchanged from 
the £38.4m delivered in the prior year. 

For the division as a whole, the limited overall growth masks a 
number of underlying movements. The production phasing for the 
large, multi-year contract won by Couplings in the prior year requires 
delivery in alternate years. Following the first year of revenue from 
this contract in the year ended 31 March 2018, revenue reduced for 
the year ended 31 March 2019. In the Couplings business unit, this 
revenue was not replaced by other revenue streams, and Couplings 
experienced a revenue decline in the year.

While this revenue ‘gap’ was not replaced in Couplings, other 
Torque Transmission business units delivered growth to recover 
this shortfall, but at lower margins. Growth was most significant in 
our US operations which delivered underlying revenue growth of 
12.8%. The potential for growth was even greater, but was ultimately 
constrained by supply chain limitations in servicing the levels of 
order growth experienced. These supply chain constraints are being 
progressively overcome, but will require continued focus in order to 
service the levels of demand; the US order book at 31 March 2019 
was 47.7% higher than the prior year position.

Underlying adjusted operating profit improved across a number of 
Torque Transmission business units, although the reductions in the 
Gears and Couplings business units more than off-set this. 

In the case of Couplings, the decline reflects the impact of the 
revenue phasing outlined above. A number of management changes 
have been made in Couplings to refocus the business and to ensure 
management actions reflect the environment in which the business 
operates.

22

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   22

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:15

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

UNDERLYING REVENUE (£m)
£38.5m
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

40.1
37.4
38.4
38.5

47.7

UNDERLYING ADJUSTED 
OPERATING MARGIN (%)
8.1%
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

7.8%

11.5%

8.1% 

16.4%

13.5%

In Gears, performance of the business has been impacted by misstated results which 
have resulted from the intentional over-reporting of profit for the three years ending 
31 March 2017, 2018 and 2019. This misstatement has been corrected in this revised 
Annual Report, along with a correction of the performance of the business unit in the 
year to 31 March 2018 through a prior period restatement (further details are outlined 
in the Finance Director’s Report and in Notes 27 and 28 to the financial statements). As 
the underlying profitability of the Gears business unit is lower than had previously been 
reported, management have commenced a programme to reduce the cost base of the 
business unit and to assess underlying profitability across the product range.

Order intake was £41.1m, which, after removing the large multi-year order won by UK 
Couplings in the prior year, represents underlying growth of 8.8%. This level of order 
intake has remained robust through the year and has contributed to the order book at 
31 March 2019 being 15.0% ahead of the prior year.

We continue with our programme of product development, encompassing RBI 
Couplings, escalator drives and bespoke gearbox solutions for OEMs, amongst others. 
The timeline for introducing new products and for customers to adopt those new 
products in industrial markets is long but we continue to believe that these actions will 
deliver future growth in Torque Transmission.

Summary
The adjusted operating profit margin delivered in the year was disappointing, although 
the performance issues were restricted to the Gears and Couplings business units. 

Strong order intake and an improved opening orderbook as we head into the new 
financial year should combine with a recovering Couplings performance, supported by 
a return of major contract revenues, to provide the platform for revenue growth and 
margin improvement. 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   23

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

23

22/08/2019   17:28:16

STRATEGIC REPORT

Finance Director’s  
Review

IAN SCAPENS
FINANCE DIRECTOR

An improved performance of the Chain 
division has increased the Group’s adjusted 
operating profit to the highest levels in recent 
years. Continued investment, particularly in 
the new Chinese factory, has increased net 
debt, but with leverage remaining low.

Revision of financial statements and prior period 
restatement
A review of the Gears business unit was initially undertaken 
following comments made by the Auditor to the Audit Committee 
regarding application of accounting controls in the business unit. 
Upon discovery of the misstatement of results for the business 
unit, the Board immediately initiated an independent internal audit 
investigation, supported by PwC. This investigation identified an 
overstatement of certain asset values and an under-recognition of 
certain liabilities for the years ended 31 March 2017, 2018 and 2019.

The independent investigation concluded that the misstatement 
was a result of an intentional misreporting of financial information 
at a local level, in addition to manipulating and adjusting reports 
and reconciliations in order to support the incorrect reporting. 
The misstatement comprised many adjustments across a number 
of balance sheet categories, including fixed assets, inventory, 
receivables, payables and cash.

The cumulative effect of these misstatements resulted in net assets 
at 31 March 2019 being overstated by £2.5m, and adjusted operating 
profit in the year to 31 March 2019 being overstated by £1.0m. As a 
result of these findings, the original Report and Accounts no longer 
gave a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and profit and loss 
of the Company and undertakings included in the consolidation 
as a whole. Following advice from professional advisers, it was 
determined that the Directors’ exercise their authority under s454 of 
Companies Act 2006 to revise the Annual Report and Accounts. These 
revised Annual Report and Accounts have been revised to correct for 
these misstatements and further detail of the revision is outlined in  
Note 28.

In addition to the revision of the financial position as at 31 March 
2019, the earlier misstatements have been corrected through a prior 
period restatement which reduces net assets at 31 March 2017 and 31 
March 2018 by £1.0m and £1.5m respectively. These misstatements 
resulted in the overstatement of adjusted operating profit by £1.0m 
and £0.5m in the years ended 31 March 2017 and 2018 respectively.

Further details of the revision to the financial statements are outlined 
in the Directors’ Report on page 83 and in Note 28 to the financial 
statements. Further details of the prior period restatement are 
outlined in the Accounting Policies section of the financial statements 
and in Note 27.

Orders and revenue

Reconciliation to reported results
As reported
Impact of foreign exchange
Pension administration costs
Restructuring costs

Pension past service credits

Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill
Underlying adjusted

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Order 
intake
£m
206.6
–
–
–

–

–
–
206.6

2019

Revenue
£m
202.4
–
–
–

–

–
–
202.4

Operating 
profit 
£m
15.2
–
0.8
2.9

(4.4)

0.9
–
15.4

2018 (restated1)

Order
intake
£m
201.9
(0.9)
–
–

–
–
–
201.0

Revenue
£m
191.6
(0.8)
–
–

–
–
–
190.8

Operating 
profit 
£m
5.1
–
0.9
4.7

–
0.9
2.1
13.7

24

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   24

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:17

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Operating profit
The Group generated an adjusted operating profit for the year of 
£15.4m (2018: £13.7m). Reported operating profit after adjusting 
items was £15.2m (2018: £5.1m).

Adjusted operating margins increased during the year to 7.6% (2018: 
7.2%), largely as a result of improved performance of the Chain 
division where adjusted operating margins increased to 11.2% (2018: 
9.6%). The adjusted operating profit delivered by the Chain division is 
the highest in recent history and demonstrates the progress that is 
being made through the strategic plan.

Due to phasing of revenue, growth in lower margin product areas and 
disappointing profitability at our Gears business unit, the adjusted 
operating margins for the Torque Transmission division declined in 
the year to 8.1% (2018: 11.2%).

Foreign exchange rates
Foreign exchange rates have remained volatile during the year, 
reflecting a depreciation of sterling against a number of currencies 
through the year, but with a slight recovery in the last few months 
of the year. The most significant movement for Renold has been the 
7% strengthening of the US dollar against sterling between March 
2018 to March 2019. However, due to the phasing of movements 
over the current and prior years, the impact on the weighted 
average exchange rate used to translate US dollar only reflects a 2% 
strengthening of the US dollar based on a weighted average rate of 
1.31 for the year ended 31 March 2019 (2018: 1.33).

The sterling to euro rate has remained more stable, with the euro 
2% weaker at 31 March 2019 when compared to 31 March 2018. 
Again, phasing of movements over the current and prior year mean 
the weighted average exchange rate used to translate euro trading 
results is unchanged based on a rate of 1.13 for the year ended 
31 March 2019 (2018: 1.13).

Group revenue
increased by

£10.8m

Adjusted operating  
profit of

£15.4m

Underlying order intake for the Chain division progressed well in the 
year with growth in the second half of 4.4% over the strong second 
half of the prior year (2018: 5.7%). This compared to growth of 5.5% 
for the first half (2018: 5.3%), and together resulted in order intake 
growth for the full year of 4.7% (2018: 5.5%). Order intake in the Chain 
division remained higher than revenue with the underlying ratio 
of orders to revenue (book-to-bill) being 101.0% in the year (2018: 
103.7%).

Underlying orders in the Torque Transmission division grew strongly, 
by 8.8% (2018: 0.2%) when the impact of the major multi-year order 
for UK Couplings is removed. The book-to-bill ratio for the division 
was 107.8% (2018: 102.4%, adjusted for the major multi-year order). 

Group revenue for the year increased by £10.8m (5.6%) to £202.4m. 
Underlying revenue increased similarly by £11.6m (6.1%). Revenue 
benefited from a combination of organic volume growth and 
increased sales prices to recover material cost increases. Underlying 
growth was broadly consistent across the year with growth of 6.4% 
for the first half moderating slightly, as sales price increases fully 
annualised, to 5.7% for the second half.

On a divisional basis, the Chain division saw underlying revenue 
increase by 7.5% and Torque Transmission by 0.3%.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   25

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

25

22/08/2019   17:28:18

STRATEGIC REPORT

Finance Director’s  
Review

FX Rates (% of Group sales)
£GBP / Euro (29%)
£GBP / US$ (37%)
£GBP / C$ (4%)
£GBP / A$ (5%)

Mar 18 
FX rate
1.14
1.40
1.81
1.83

Sep 18
FX rate
1.12
1.31
1.71
1.82

Sep 18
Var %
(2%)
(6%)
(6%)
(1%)

Mar 19
FX rate
1.16
1.30
1.74
1.83

Mar 19
Var %
2%
(7%)
(4%)
nil%

If the year-end exchange rates had applied throughout the year, there 
would be an estimated decrease of £0.4m to revenue and  
£0.1m to operating profit.

Restructuring costs
Various restructuring costs were incurred in the year as part of 
the Step 2020 Strategic Plan. The most significant costs were in 
connection with redundancy and restructuring costs arising on the 
relocation of the Chinese factory of £1.8m.

Other costs incurred related to management changes, final costs 
on the closure of the Singapore office and with the move of stock 
exchange listing to AIM.

Other adjusting items
Other adjusting items include legacy pension scheme administration 
costs of £0.8m (2018: £0.9m) and amortisation of acquired intangible 
assets of £0.9m (2018: £0.9m).

More significant in the year is the past service credit for the UK 
pension scheme of £4.4m which is the net impact of a gain following 
the move of certain future pension increases from RPI to CPI of 
£8.2m, partially off-set by a past service cost relating to GMP 
equalisation of £3.8m. Further details on these pension adjustments 
are outlined on page 28.

Financing costs
External net interest costs in the year were £2.2m (2018: £1.7m). 
The annual charge includes £0.3m (2018: £0.3m charge) in respect 
of amortisation of the residual refinancing costs paid in 2012, 
2015 and in 2017. Financing costs also include £0.1m of unwinding 
discounts on onerous lease provisions established for the 
Bredbury factory site.

The net IAS 19R finance charge (which is a non-cash item) remained 
stable at £2.4m (2018: £2.4m) and is treated as an adjusting item. 
A further adjusting item included within finance costs is a £0.3m cost 
write-off of all remaining bank facility arrangement fees from the old 
facility, as a result of amending and extending the facility in the year.

Result before tax
Profit before tax was £10.2m (2018: £0.9m). Adjusted profit before 
tax, which excludes restructuring costs, IAS 19R financing costs, 
amortisation of acquired intangible assets, legacy pension scheme 
costs, amortisation of financing costs and discounts on provisions, 
was £13.2m (2018: £12.0m).

Taxation
The current year tax charge of £3.5m (2018: £3.6m) is made up of a 
current tax charge of £1.1m (2018: £1.1m) and a deferred tax charge of 
£2.4m (2018: £2.5m). Following an increased tax charge in the prior 
year resulting from US tax reform, the tax charge remained high in 
the year to 31 March 2019 as a result of the deferred tax charge on 
the pension past service credit arising in the year.

The Group cash tax paid reduced to £1.8m (2018: £3.8m). 

Group results for the financial period
A profit after tax of £6.7m was achieved for the financial year ended 
31 March 2019 (2018: loss of £2.7m). Adjusted earnings per share was 
4.5p (2018: 4.3p). Basic earnings per share of 2.9p compares with a 
loss per share of 1.2p for the year ended 31 March 2018.

Balance sheet
Net liabilities at 31 March 2019 were £0.9m (2018: net liabilities 
£0.4m). Although net profit of £6.7m was delivered for the year, net 
assets decreased slightly as the impact of remeasurement losses on 
retirement benefit obligations (driven by decreases in discount rates 
and increases in inflation), reduced retained profit by £11.2m.

Net assets continue to be impacted by the net pension deficit which 
increased to £101.9m (2018: £97.4m). The net liability for pension 
benefit obligations was £85.3m (2018: £81.7m) after allowing for a net 
deferred tax asset of £16.6m (2018: £15.7m). Overseas schemes now 
account for £29.3m (29%) of the net pension deficits and £25.5m of 
this is in respect of the German scheme which is unfunded.

Cash flow and borrowings
Cash generated from operations was £8.3m (2018: £6.0m). Gross 
capital expenditure in the year was £10.8m (2018: £10.0m), with the 
largest element relating to the new Chinese factory.

The absolute level of working capital was £1.5m higher than in the 
prior year, reflecting increased inventory holdings in support of 
improving customer service through the Step to Service programme.

Group net borrowings at 31 March 2019 of £30.3m were £6.0m 
higher than the opening position of £24.3m comprising cash and cash 
equivalents of £17.6m (2018: £13.9m) and borrowings of £47.9m (2018: 
£38.2m). The increase in net debt reflects the investment in the new 
Chinese factory, both through capital investment and through cash 
restructuring costs.

26

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   26

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:18

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Debt facility and capital structure
The Group’s core banking facilities were amended and extended 
in March 2019. Following the amendment, the Group’s committed 
multi-currency revolving credit facility (MCRF) totalled £61.5m, with 
an additional £20.5m accordion facility providing a route to additional 
funding if required, although this element is not committed. As a 
result of the extension of term, the facility matures in March 2024. 
Borrowing under the facility at 31 March 2019 was £48.3m.

The Group continues to operate comfortably within covenant limits. 
The net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio as at 31 March 2019 is 1.29 times 
(covenant requirement: up to 2.5 times; 2018: 1.12 times), based 
on the reported figures for the period as adjusted for the banking 
agreement. The adjusted EBITDA/interest cover as at 31 March 2019 
is 10.0 times (covenant requirement: greater than 4.0 times; 2018: 
12.0 times), again on a banking basis.

At 31 March 2019, the Group had unused credit facilities totalling 
£12.8m and cash balances of £17.6m. Total Group credit facilities 
amounted to £63.2m, all of which were committed.

Treasury and financial instruments
The Group’s treasury policy, approved by the Board, is to manage its 
funding requirements and treasury risks without undertaking any 
speculative risks. Treasury and financing matters are assessed further 
in the section on Principal Risks and Uncertainties.

To manage foreign currency exchange risk on the translation of net 
investments, certain US dollar denominated borrowings taken out in 
the UK to finance US acquisitions are designated as a hedge of the 
net investment in US subsidiaries. At 31 March 2019 this hedge was 
fully effective. The carrying value of these borrowings at 31 March 
2019 was £6.7m (2018: £6.2m).

At 31 March 2019, the Group had 1% (2018: 1%) of its gross debt at 
fixed interest rates. Cash deposits are placed short-term with banks 
where security and liquidity are the primary objectives. The Group 
has no significant concentrations of credit risk with sales made to a 
wide spread of customers, industries and geographies. Policies are 
in place to ensure that credit risk on individual customers is kept to 
a minimum.

Pension assets and liabilities 
The Group has a mix of UK (83% of gross liabilities) and overseas (17%) defined benefit pension obligations as shown below.

Defined benefit schemes
UK scheme
Overseas schemes

Deferred tax asset 
Net deficit

Assets
£m

138.6
13.8
152.4

2019
Liabilities
£m

(211.2)
(43.1)
(254.3)

Deficit
£m

(72.6)
(29.3)
(101.9)
16.6
(85.3)

Assets
£m

140.7
13.1
153.8

2018
Liabilities
£m

(210.3)
(40.9)
(251.2)

Deficit
£m

(69.6)
(27.8)
(97.4)
15.7
(81.7)

The Group’s retirement benefit obligations increased from £97.4m (£81.7m net of deferred tax) at 31 March 2018 to £101.9m (£85.3m net of 
deferred tax) at 31 March 2019. The largest element of the increase relates to the UK scheme where the deficit increased from £69.6m to £72.6m. 
Reflecting changes in assumptions for discount rates and inflation rates, the deficit of the overseas schemes increased by £1.5m to £29.3m.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   27

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

27

22/08/2019   17:28:19

STRATEGIC REPORT

Finance Director’s  
Review

UK funded scheme
The deficit of the UK scheme increased in the year to £72.6m 
(2018: £69.6m) reflecting a number of changes in assumptions and 
factors. Following the High Court judgment in the year, Renold, 
along with many other pension scheme sponsors, is recognising an 
estimate of the future cost of GMP equalisation in the valuation of 
liabilities. This increases the liabilities by £3.8m.

As a continuation of the management of future liabilities, agreement 
was reached with the Trustee to use the consumer prices index 
(CPI) rather than the retail prices index (RPI) for future increases 
of certain elements of the scheme where such a change is permitted. 
This reduces the liabilities by £8.2m.

The net reduction in liabilities of £4.4m, from the combined effects 
of GMP equalisation and the RPI to CPI change, is a past service credit 
and is therefore included as operating income in the Statement of 
Comprehensive Income.

Off-setting the reduction in deficit from the past service credits is the 
impact of changes to the assumptions for discount rate and inflation. 
The assumed discount rate has reduced by 0.2% to 2.4%, increasing 
liabilities by £6.1m, while the assumed CPI inflation rate has increased 
by 0.2% to 2.4%, further increasing liabilities by £4.2m.

The latest triennial actuarial valuation of the UK Scheme, with an 
effective date of 5 April 2016, was agreed in May 2017. The next 
triennial valuation date will be as at 5 April 2019.

Total cash costs for UK deficit repair payments were £3.0m 
(2018: £2.9m).

Overseas schemes
The largest element of the overseas schemes is the German unfunded 
scheme, with a total deficit of £25.5m. Other overseas funded 
schemes comprise a number of smaller schemes around the world, 
with a combined deficit of £3.8m. The increase in combined deficits of 
all the overseas schemes of £1.5m is most significantly impacted by 
the discount rate and inflation financial assumptions, which together 
result in a £2.0m increase in deficit.

For overseas pension schemes, the Company contributions in the year 
were £1.6m (2018: £1.7m).

Future accounting changes
For the year ending 31 March 2020, Renold will adopt IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. 
The requirements of this standard have not been adopted for the 
year ended 31 March 2019, but we have estimated the impact on the 
financial statements. Based on the Group’s existing leases, a right 
of use asset of c.£9.9m would be recognised, off-set by future lease 
liabilities of c.£17.6m.

In the statement of comprehensive income, in order to reflect the 
change in recognition of annual lease costs, EBITDA would increase by 
c.£2.9m, being off-set by an increase in depreciation of the right of use 
asset of c.£2.3m and an increase in financing costs of c.£0.4m.

IAN SCAPENS

GROUP FINANCE DIRECTOR

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

PENSION INSIGHTS

DRIVERS OF PENSION DEFICIT MOVEMENT

UK – GMP 
(••)
equalisation

UK – 
RPI to CPI

UK – 
discount rate

UK – 
inflation rate

UK – 
contributions

(3.8)

(6.1)

(4.2)

Overseas –
discount rate & inflation

Other

Deficit up

The net pension deficit increased by 4.6% in the year to £101.9m.

Following a High Court judgment in the year, Renold, along with many 
other pension scheme sponsors, is recognising an estimate of the 
future cost of GMP equalisation. This increases the deficit by £3.8m.

8.2

Agreement was reached with the Trustee of the UK scheme to apply 
CPI rather than RPI for future increases to certain elements of the 
scheme, where such a change is permitted. This reduces the deficit 
by £8.2m.

3.0

(2.0)

0.4

£m

Deficit down

For the UK scheme, the combined effect of a 0.2% decrease in 
discount rate and a 0.2% increase in inflation combined to increase 
the deficit of the UK scheme by £10.3m.

For the overseas schemes, similar reductions in discount rates and 
increases in inflation increased the deficit of these schemes by £2.0m.

The deficit remains highly sensitive to discount rates, and across all 
schemes it is estimated that an increase in the discount rate of  
0.25% (with all other factors being equal) would reduce the net deficit 
by c.£8.6m.

28

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   28

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:20

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

UK ASSETS %

Cash and other

3%

Insurance
policies

31%

Gilts and LDI

Equity

27%

£138.6m
Assets

16%

8%

15%

Hedge funds, 
diversified funds 
and high yield

Private 
debt funds

Given the relative maturity of the scheme, and following the 
medically underwritten insured buy-ins, 50% of assets are invested 
in insurance policies, gilts, liability-driven investments and cash 
(protection assets). They are held primarily to generate an income 
stream that supports the ongoing annual pension payments 
(currently circa £11.0m including cash lump sums on retirement).

Growth assets (including equities, hedge funds, diversified growth 
funds and high yield and private debt funds) represent 50% of UK 
assets. The overall target for UK portfolio returns is 2.6% over gilts. 
The actual UK return in the year was a gain of £5.8m (or 6.1% gain 
on assets excluding insurance policies).

It should be noted that the diversified growth funds have 
characteristics of both protection assets (returns are lower and less 
volatile than equities) and growth assets (return targets are higher 
than simple gilts and bonds).

TRENDS IN UK SCHEME MEMBERSHIP

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

2005 2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pensioners
Deferred
Active

The bar chart shows the evolution of the total membership of the 
UK scheme since 2005 and the numbers in each category.

Total membership has fallen by 52% or 3,123 since 2010 or 65% 
since 2005.

The step change in 2014 followed the merger of the three UK 
schemes when 1,316 members had their benefits paid out in full 
in wind-up lump sums.

Of the remaining 1,145 deferred members, a number are expected 
to have their benefits discharged as a lump sum on retirement.

MORTALITY AND MORTALITY EXPOSURE

)
s
r
a
e
y

e
f
i
l
(

e
r
u
s
o
p
x
E

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018  

Exposure

Actual deaths

Expected deaths

180

160

140

120

100

80

40

20

0

s
h
t
a
e
d

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

The chart to the left shows a comparison between expected 
and actual mortality in the UK scheme based on the assumptions 
underlying the March 2019 Annual Report and the actual 
mortality experience.

The chart also shows the number of life years that could 
be expected to die each year (referred to as ‘Exposure’).

The fall in Exposure over the years has largely been driven 
by the significant falls in membership numbers resulting from 
the scheme merger and various small pots exercises as well 
as mortality itself and the age of the membership.

The chart clearly shows that, even based on the current strong 
mortality assumptions, actual deaths have been higher than expected 
levels. If mortality continues at a higher rate than assumed, all else 
being equal, the level of future pension payments would fall.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   29

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

29

22/08/2019   17:28:20

 
 
 
 
STRATEGIC REPORT

Our Risks

Proactive risk management is a key business process at Renold and is used to help management 
create and protect value. In the current environment, with geopolitical and economic 
uncertainty, its relevance to safeguarding shareholder value is even more critical.

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
As described in the chart below, we consider risk across  
the organisation, blending a holistic top-down view with site, 
functional and project-specific assessments.

THE BOARD 

Sets the ‘Tone from the Top’ – 
the culture adopted in respect 
of risk.

 •

Defines acceptable levels of 
risk (referred to as our ‘risk 
appetite’).

Responsible for risk 
management and internal 
control processes.

Sets direction for key focus 
areas (e.g. health and safety).

 • Monitors compliance 

with our risk appetite and 
management’s responsiveness 
to actions designed to address 
excessive risk.

AUDIT COMMITTEE 

Supports the Board, 
reviewing the end-to-end risk 
management process.

 •

Particular emphasis is 
placed upon monitoring 
the implementation of risk 
mitigation actions.

GROUP RISK FUNCTION 

 •

 •

 •

Facilitates the maintenance of  
risk registers and action plans.

Reviews status of risk  
management actions.

Performs internal audits on  
areas of significant risk.

EXECUTIVE RISK 
MANAGEMENT AND 
MONITORING COMMITTEE

Oversight of risk registers and  
their maintenance.

Challenge and review of  
completed actions.

Review and critique of 
risk profiles presented by 
senior business leaders and 
challenge of risk mitigation 
plans.

Shares best practice risk 
management and solutions 
across the Group.

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

BUSINESS UNITS

 • Maintain local risk registers  

 •

and action plans.

Embedding Group culture and 
risk appetite at a local level.

 •

Ongoing action management  
and tracking.

Our approach to risk
Renold’s risk management framework is designed to identify 
and assess the probabilities and consequences of risks occurring, 
to manage the actions necessary to reduce those risks, and to 
mitigate their potential impact. 

The Board has overall responsibility and oversight of the risk 
management framework and is also responsible for setting the 
parameters of acceptable and unacceptable risk (referred to as 
‘risk appetite’). 

Renold’s risk appetite
The Board acknowledges that the Group is exposed to risk during 
the normal course of business. Renold must be willing to accept 
an appropriate level of risk in order to achieve its Strategic 
Objectives. The Board’s attitude to risk management and its 
appetite for risk can be described as ‘tending to risk averse’. 

Our risk management process: 
The Executive Risk Management and Monitoring Committee

The Group Audit Committee reviews the principal risks and 
uncertainties together with the actions taken and relevant 
mitigating controls. The Group Executive Risk Management and 
Monitoring Committee (ERMMC) is a sub-committee of the main 
Board. The ERMMC is chaired by the Chief Executive and meets 
at least four times per year.

The ERMMC comprises the Executive Directors. Senior members 
of the business attend by invitation and are required to present 
risk profiles for their functional areas and the aligned action plans 
to manage or mitigate risk. The Group Finance Director, Group 
Business Systems Director, the Group HR Director, the Group 
Head of Risk and Assurance and the Group General Counsel and 
Company Secretary also attend each meeting.

Each ERMMC meeting is informed by a detailed risk management 
status report. This report provides an insight on new risks and 
progress on mitigating actions on all risks. Other topical risk 
issues also feature on the standing agenda, e.g. there is focus on 
the Group’s response to, and management of, important health 
and safety-related events. The ERMMC is also provided with 
information in the form of reports on health and safety, treasury, 
insurance, material litigation and whistleblowing. 

All ERMMC minutes and the risk status reports are reviewed and 
discussed by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reports 
on these discussions to the Board. 

30

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   30

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:20

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

How we assess risk
Our approach combines sharing best practice across sites, guidance 
from the Group Head of Risk and Assurance, and local ‘on the ground’ 
experience and knowledge of specific risk factors.

Risk workshops involving local and functional staff are used to 
develop risk profiles and action plans. The Group Head of Risk and 
Assurance facilitates the end-to-end risk management process, 
ensuring consistency of approach and compliance with Group Policy.

Risks are assessed against the framework defined in the Group Risk 
Management Policy. Our risk assessment model considers: 

 •
 •

The probability of a risk materialising.

The potential impact if the risk materialised – impact definitions 
cover a range of criteria, including direct financial impact, 
reputational impact, people impact, e.g. in the event of an 
accident, regulatory censure, adverse publicity and fines.

These are scored and then placed on the risk heat map below, which 
is a matrix of probability and impact and shows our principal risks and 
uncertainties. Our model also considers each risk from two different 
perspectives:

 •

 •

The extent of inherent risk (i.e. before any mitigating controls  
or actions);

The extent of residual risk (i.e. after mitigating controls  
and actions). 

This allows us to identify the impact of controls on the underlying 
inherent risk.

How we manage risk
Having identified the risks the business faces and having scored 
them against the risk appetite set by the Board, our Group Policy 
then provides guidance on how to manage those risks, depending on 
where they sit on the risk heat map. 

The ‘heat map’ shows the four bandings in the different shades of 
risks as set out below as well as expected actions and responses to 
risks in these areas: 

 •
 •

 •

 •

Green: within appetite. Ongoing monitoring in place.

Amber: out of appetite. Some actions are required to treat the 
risk to bring this within acceptable levels. 

Red: significantly out of appetite. High combination of residual 
probability and impact. Management actions required, with some 
urgency, to treat the risk, reducing this to acceptable levels. 

Grey/black: risks that are deemed to have such an impact that 
they could theoretically impact the ability of the business to 
continue in existence. If any, they would need consideration in 
assessing the Directors’ Viability Statement. 

The Group has deployed an online integrated risk management 
system (IRMS) across all locations. This is used to capture risk profiles 
and action plans are maintained across the Group. The IRMS operates 
as a live management tool that assists staff in actions management 
and also in the production of real time risk status reports. Risk reports 
for the various Executive committees derive data from the IRMS.

Risk heat map as at 31 March 2019

Impact

6

1

9

5

3

2

10

8

7

Key:         –         Residual risk after mitigation      

10

1

KEY: RISK HEAT MAP

1  Macroeconomic and political volatility

2  Strategy execution

3  Acquisitions/business development

4  Health and safety in the workplace*

5   Effective deployment and utilisation of IT systems

6  Prolonged loss of a manufacturing site

7  People and change

8   Liquidity, foreign exchange and banking 

arrangements

9  Pensions deficit volatility

10  Regulatory and legal compliance

* 

 The risk associated with health and safety in the workplace 
(4) is not represented on the risk heat map. The risk heat map 
assesses a financial impact against a likelihood of an event 
occurring. As health and safety relates to the well-being of 
employees and others, it is not felt appropriate to assess this 
against a financial measure.

Likelihood

Likelihood

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   31

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

31

22/08/2019   17:28:20

STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal Risks  
and Uncertainties

The Board continues to carry out a robust assessment of the 
principal risks facing the business. The Executive Risk Management 
and Monitoring Committee monitors the ongoing identification and 
assessment of risks, reviews all risks in the IRMS and reports material 
risks to the Audit Committee. 

Set out on pages 32 to 36 are the principal risks and uncertainties 
which could have a material impact on the Group. The numbers 
correspond to the risk identified on the heat map.

These risks are continually monitored. The Board has critically 
reassessed the risks we face in light of the Group’s progress on its STEP 
2020 Strategic Plan coupled with the volatility in our end markets. 

We indicate whether or not we consider the probability or impact of 
the risks materialising are increasing, decreasing or unchanged and 
set out the corresponding mitigating actions that have been taken by 
the Group. We also show which of our Strategic Objectives could be 
impacted by the risk.

1  MACROECONOMIC AND POLITICAL VOLATILITY

DETAILED RISK

Material changes in prevailing macroeconomic or political conditions 
could have a detrimental impact on business performance. We 
operate in 18 countries and sell to customers in over 100 and 
therefore we are necessarily exposed to economic and political risks 
in these territories.

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   2

7  

FY18 

FY19 

POTENTIAL IMPACT 

Potential touchpoints include:

 •

 •

Commodity prices which have a negative impact on demand 
in the whole supply chain.

Foreign exchange volatility can impact customer buying  
patterns, leading to lower demand or the need to rapidly  
switch supply chains.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •

Our diversified geographic footprint inherently exposes us to more countries where risks arise but conversely provides some degree of 
resilience.

 •
 •
 •

Actions to lower the Group’s overall breakeven point also serve to reduce the impact of any global economic slowdown.

A focus on ‘predict and respond’, e.g. sales forecasting and raw material price monitoring.

Strong core banking group with multi-currency debt facility.

2  STRATEGY EXECUTION

FY18 

FY19 

DETAILED RISK

POTENTIAL IMPACT 

The Group’s strategy requires the co-ordinated delivery of a number 
of complex projects, e.g. during the year we have relocated major 
production facilities.

While these projects are designed to deliver targeted benefits, if not 
appropriately managed, they have the potential to negatively impact 
the Group’s operations

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   2

3

4

5

6

7  

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •

The STEP 2020 Strategic Plan has been developed to deliver a turnaround in performance and to make that performance more stable 
and less exposed to revenue volatility.

 •

The Board reviews progress against the different STEP 2020 projects in each of its meetings. This is based on a regularly updated report 
from the CEO which groups the individual projects into themes linked directly to our Strategic Objectives.

 • Major projects are all managed in accordance with best practice project management techniques with at least one member of the 

Executive team on the relevant Steering Committees. 

32

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   32

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:21

 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

1

2

Significantly improving our health  
and safety performance

Generating margin enhancing growth 
from our superior product capability

3

4

5

Enhancing customer service

Optimising business processes

Lowering our breakeven point

6

7

Developing our people

Strengthening and de-risking our  
balance sheet

3  ACQUISITIONS/BUSINESS 

DETAILED RISK

Part of the Group’s strategy is to grow through selective 
acquisitions. Performance of acquired businesses may not reach 
expectations, impacting Group profitability and cash flows.

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   2

5

7

FY18 

FY19 

POTENTIAL IMPACT 
 •

Any acquisition involves risks at various stages of the project life 
cycle.

 •

During the acquisitions phase, value can be lost through 
over-paying, missing key issues in due diligence or potential 
value leakage through poor contract negotiation. Value can 
also be lost through a poorly planned or executed integration 
phase. Finally, failure to deliver anticipated benefits during the 
‘business as usual’ phase can also lead to a loss of value.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 • Monitoring of specific acquisition targets: Business Acquisition Process incorporating Concept Evaluation, Business Case, Indicative Offer/
Heads of Terms, Due Diligence (covering a range of criteria), Integration Planning and Execution and Post Integration Appraisal which in 
turn feeds back to the Business Acquisition Process.

 •
 •

 •

Use of third party specialists to address risks specific to each acquisition.

Formation of top-down cross-functional business integration project teams and plans. These specifically address any issues or risks 
identified during the acquisitions phase.

Deployment of detailed benefits realisation plans.

4  HEALTH AND SAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE DEVELOPMENT

FY18 

FY19 

DETAILED RISK

POTENTIAL IMPACT 

The risk of death or serious injury to employees or third parties 
associated with Renold’s worldwide operations. 

We are proud of the progress we have made in recent years, 
but recognise that we have more to do. 

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   1

6

7

Accidents caused by a lack of robust safety procedures could 
result in life-changing impacts for employees, visitors or contractors. 
This will always be unacceptable. In addition, accidents could result 
in civil or criminal liability for both the Group and the Directors and 
officers of the Group and Group companies, leading to financial loss 
or reputational damage. 

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •

Group policies and a Group-wide management system known as the Framework, to set control expectations, with a support training 
programme for all managers.

 •
 •
 •
 •

The Group operates a rolling programme of health and safety audits to assess compliance against the Framework.

Continual hazard assessments to ensure awareness of risks.

Live tracking of accident rates and root cause analysis via the IRMS plus monthly Board reporting focused on a range of KPIs.

Specific initiatives include the BAT (Be safe; Act safe; Think safe) safety logo and the Annual Health and Safety Awards Scheme to 
recognise success.

READ MORE ABOUT OUR STRATEGY  
ON PAGES 12 AND 13

SEVERITY

TREND DIRECTION

High

Medium  

Low

increasing

unchanged

decreasing

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   33

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

33

22/08/2019   17:28:21

 
 
STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal Risks  
and Uncertainties

5  EFFECTIVE DEPLOYMENT AND UTILISATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

FY18 

FY19 

DETAILED RISK

We seek to leverage the use of IT to achieve competitive advantage. 
The Group continues to implement a global ERP system to replace 
numerous legacy systems which inherently brings with it the risks 
associated with a large-scale change programme.

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   3

4

5

POTENTIAL IMPACT 
 •

Interruption or failure of IT systems (including the impact of a 
cyber attack) would negatively impact or prevent some business 
activities from occurring. If the interruption was long lasting, 
significant damage could be done to the business. 

 •

 •

 •

It is essential that we are able to rely on the data derived from 
our business system to feed routine but fundamental business 
performance monitoring.

An unsuccessful implementation of the global ERP system has 
the potential to materially impact that site’s, and possibly the 
Group’s, performance.

The risk is assessed as stable as we have already successfully 
implemented the ERP at three locations.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •

Short-term stabilisation of existing hardware and legacy software platforms.

Governance and control arrangement operating over the Group’s ERP implementation programme.

Use of specialist external consultants and recruitment of experienced personnel.

Phased implementation rather than ‘big bang’.

Project assurance and ‘lessons learned’ reviews to continuously improve the quality of successive roll-outs.

Template blueprint agreed to form the basis of the implementations.

Steering Committee in operation with cascading project management disciplines.

A range of preventative and detective controls to manage the risk of a cyber attack.

6  PROLONGED LOSS OF A MANUFACTURING SITE

DETAILED RISK

A catastrophic loss of the use of all or a significant portion of a 
strategic production facility. This could result from an accident, a 
strike by employees, fire, severe weather or other cause outside of 
management control. 

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   1

5

7

FY18 

FY19 

POTENTIAL IMPACT 
 •

In the short or long term, a related risk event could adversely 
affect the Group’s ability to meet the demands of its customers.

 •

Specifically, this could entail significant repair costs or costs of 
alternate supply while repairs are made. A significant proportion 
of the Group’s revenue is on relatively short lead times and a 
break in our supply chain could result in loss of revenue. All of 
this translates into lower sales and profits.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •

Preventative maintenance programmes and new investments to reduce risk of interruption of manufacturing.

A Group Fire Safety Policy mandating preventive, detective and containment controls.

Alternate manufacturing capacity exists for a growing portion of the Group’s product range.

Core sites are continuing to develop Business Continuity Plans for use in the event of a serious business disruption.

Inventory maintained to absorb and flatten out raw material supply and production volatility.

The Group has comprehensive insurance policies to mitigate the impact of a number of these risks.

34

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   34

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:21

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

7  PEOPLE AND CHANGE

DETAILED RISK

POTENTIAL IMPACT 

FY18 

FY19 

The Group’s operations are dependent upon the ability to attract 
and retain the right people with an appropriate range of skills  
and experience. 

Succession planning and the ability to swiftly replace staff retiring 
or leaving is also critical.

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   1

4

6

Failure to retain, attract or motivate the required calibre of 
employees will negatively impact business performance. 
The delivery of the STEP 2020 Strategic Plan and our strategic 
goals may also be delayed.

Competitive reward programmes, focused training and development, and a talent retention programme.

Ongoing reviews of succession plans based on business needs.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •
 •
 • Management team strengthened with new capability from external hires and internal promotions.
 •

The Renold Values, launched in 2015, continue to be embedded.

Performance management and personal development programmes introduced alongside training initiatives. 

8  LIQUIDITY, FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND BANKING ARRANGEMENTS

FY18 

FY19 

DETAILED RISK

A lack of sufficient liquidity and flexibility in banking arrangements 
could inhibit the Group’s ability to invest for the future or, in 
extremes, restrict day-to-day operations. 

In the past, banking markets and Renold’s own performance have 
made access to debt facilities difficult. 

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   4

5

7

POTENTIAL IMPACT 
 •

Potentially cause under-investment and sub-optimal short-term 
decision making.

 •

 •

Limiting investment could prevent efficiency savings and reduce 
competitiveness.

In an extreme situation, the Group’s ability to operate as a going 
concern could also be jeopardised.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •
 •

The Group’s primary banking facility expires in March 2024 and is fully available given current levels of profitability.

The facility includes additional drawdown capability, accessible as long as financial covenants are complied with.

Rolling foreign exchange forward contracts covering expected future cashflows.

SEVERITY

TREND DIRECTION

High

Medium  

Low

increasing

unchanged

decreasing

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   35

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

35

22/08/2019   17:28:21

 
STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal Risks  
and Uncertainties

9  PENSIONS DEFICIT VOLATILITY

DETAILED RISK

The principal pensions risk is that short-term cash funding 
requirements of legacy pension scheme diverts much needed 
investment away from the Group’s operations. 

Secondly, the size of the reported balance sheet deficit can operate 
as a disincentive to potential investors or other stakeholders. 

Thirdly, balance sheet deficits can fluctuate based on market 
conditions outside the control of management. 

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   7

FY18 

FY18 

POTENTIAL IMPACT 
 •

Given the Group’s cash needs to invest in the business, the pace 
of performance improvement could be slowed if cash has to be 
diverted to the pension schemes.

 •

The balance sheet pension deficit and its volatility could act as a 
disincentive to potential investors and could reduce the Group’s 
ability to raise new equity or debt financing.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •

The Pension Strategy has been updated to 2020.

The major UK pension cash flows are stable under the 25-year asset-backed funding scheme put in place during 2013. A further 25% 
of the annual cash flows are pensions in payment in Germany in a mature scheme that has passed its peak funding requirement. 

 •

All pension risks are actively managed in line with the Group’s risk management system covering investment and liability  
management issues.

10  REGULATORY AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE

DETAILED RISK

POTENTIAL IMPACT 

FY18 

FY19 

The risk of censure, fine or business prohibition as a result of 
any part of the Group failing to comply with regulatory or legal 
obligations.

Risks related to regulatory and legislative changes include the 
inability of the Group to comply with current, changing or new 
requirements.

Many of the Group’s business activities are subject to increasing 
regulation and enforcement by relevant authorities.

LINK TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES   7

Failure by the Group or its representatives to abide by applicable 
laws and regulations could result in:

 •
 •
 •
 •

Administrative, civil or criminal liability.

Significant fines and penalties.

Suspension of the Group from trading.

Reputational damage.

Communication of a clear compliance culture.

EXISTING MITIGATION CONTROLS
 •
 •
 •
 • Monitoring of compliance with nominated accountable managers in each business unit.

Risk assessments and ongoing compliance reviews at least annually at all major locations.

Published up-to-date policies and procedures with clear guidance and training issued to all employees.

SEVERITY

TREND DIRECTION

High

Medium  

Low

increasing

unchanged

decreasing

36

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   36

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:22

 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Viability 
Statement

The UK Corporate Governance Code requires the Directors to assess 
the prospects of the Group over a period significantly longer than 
12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements 
which is used as the basis for assessing Going Concern.

The Group’s Strategic Plan covers the three year period to March 
2022. Following amendment and extension, the Group’s core 
financing facility expires in March 2024 but, following normal market 
practice, is likely to be renegotiated at least 12 months earlier. The 
Board determined that an appropriate and relevant period for 
preparing forecasts linked to the Group’s Strategic Plan was the three 
year period to March 2022, and that the viability review should be 
performed using this plan as the basis.

As in prior years, the Board and Audit Committee have continued 
to review and assess the Group’s ongoing risk appetite, register of 
principal risks and uncertainties and progress on actions to mitigate 
the probability and impact of risks crystallising. The internal control 
structures and processes described on pages 54 to 56 also serve 
to mitigate exposure to single risk events that could threaten the 
Group’s longer term viability. While all risks have the potential to 
impact longer term viability, the principal risks deemed more relevant 
for a reasonable assessment of viability are set out below:

 •

Strategy Execution: the risk of the Group’s inability to successfully 
implement the Strategic Plan which could lead to the Group 
continuing to experience volatile financial results and weak levels 
of cash generation.

 • Macroeconomic and political volatility: uncertainty driven by 
global events is undoubtedly creating volatility. These events 
range from Brexit, increased protectionism to geopolitical 
uncertainty. As an international manufacturing business, the 
Group is dependent on stable trading environments to deliver our 
products and the resulting shareholder value. Significant changes 
in global trading dynamics have the potential to undermine the 
Group’s longer term prospects.

The Board has continued to review the Strategic Plan during the 
current year. This included an additional detailed review of our 
markets, competitors and product strategies in addition to financial 
forecasts. The review assessed the results of stress tests on financial 
forecasts and also financing options around our acquisition strategy 
in Phase III of the Strategic Plan. In these stress tests a number of 
scenarios were reviewed including one in which sales levels were a 
further 10% below the year ended 31 March 2019 and a second in 
which sales growth was limited to being 50% below future growth 
plans. The Board thereby assessed the potential impact of the risks 
noted above which could affect solvency or liquidity in ‘severe but 
plausible’ scenarios over the three year period and concluded that the 
business would remain viable.

The Group maintains a conservative approach to borrowing and 
while our banking covenants have leverage limits of 2.5x Adjusted 
EBITDA, the Board seeks to operate within an internally imposed 2.0x 
leverage limit which ensures there is access to short-term borrowing 
to cope with any short-term financial shocks. 

Based on the results of the processes described above and the 
Board’s overall comprehensive and proactive approach to risk 
management, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the 
Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as 
they fall due over the period of assessment.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   37

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

37

22/08/2019   17:28:22

26945  22 August 2019 5:28 pm  Proof 4STRATEGIC REPORTRenold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 201938Health and SafetyOur focus on improving our health and safety performance has remained a key priority. Key Strategic ObjectiveSignificantly improving our health and safety performance remains a key Strategic Objective and all Renold’s locations across the world operate against a Group Health and Safety Management Framework (the Framework). In 2014, an annual Health and Safety Awards Scheme was introduced and the rules of the scheme encourage continuous improvement aligned to the Framework. Recognising the further improvements being made across the Group, ten awards were made in 2018, including, for the first time, three ‘Excellence’ awards, the highest level of award currently available. The awards for 2019 are due for allocation in June 2019 after aligning the health and safety audit year to the financial year.Health and safety governanceGovernance structures are clearly defined and include a Group Health and Safety Policy which is reviewed annually. Cascading from this is the Framework, which defines the Board’s expectations regarding health and safety control and performance. Management across all locations are required to adhere to the Framework. This Framework contains principles and expectations describing a set of outcomes and provides a structure to manage health and safety. The Framework is consistent with recognised standards, including the internationally adopted model of Plan-Do-Measure-Act and OHSAS 18001, with accredited certification held by all of our major production facilities. Going forward, all sites have the objective to migrate from OHSAS 18001 to ISO 45001 by 2021.The Framework consists of seven core components, which include setting a supportive leadership tone, with sub-processes covering hazard assessment, incident management and the management of third parties. Working with Third PartiesHazardAssessmentTraining and BehavioursOperations and MaintenanceInformation and DocumentationIncident Analysis and PreventionAssessment, Assurance and ImprovementThe Framework •Determine the scope of the management system •Set objectives  and timescales •Develop KPIs based  upon desired outcomes •Create a management structure with clearly assigned accountabilities •Create and implement processes and procedures including controls  and training •Set standards for  record keeping •Conduct timely monitoring and  measurement confirming the status of compliance •Develop and implement corrective/ preventative actions •Periodically assess the management system’s  design effectiveness •Identify and respond to areas of improvement •Adapt to changes  in legislative   requirementsSustainabilityPlanLearnDoMeasureREAD MORE ABOUT OUR STRATEGY  ON PAGES 12 AND 13Renold 2019-AR.indd   3822/08/2019   17:28:22OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We use a web-based Integrated Risk Management System (IRMS), 
which provides aligned processes and data mining functionality. 
This allows sites to manage accident reporting, opportunities for 
improvement, hazard assessment and to track all improvement 
actions. Performance data to inform monthly Board reporting and 
site reviews are extracted from the system. 

An independent programme of audits is in place, which requires all 
material sites to be audited within a 12-month period. This assesses 
compliance and performance against the Framework. Each audit 
typically takes a week to perform, to support a robust assessment of 
compliance against the Framework. The assurance results, along with 
other KPIs, are reported each month to the Board. There is particular 
focus on any serious accidents, including mitigating root cause and 
ensuring updated consistent practices are rolled out across all sites.

Improvement initiatives
The following examples of health and safety initiatives and specific 
site improvements are indicative of the broad range of positive 
changes which continue to be made:

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

Renold’s Health and Safety Awards scheme is now an important 
part of the calendar for all sites.

Renold’s BAT logo continues to be used by all sites to reinforce 
the message: Be safe; Act safe; Think safe.

Personal protective equipment requirements are regularly 
reviewed and we have ensured that clear communication of 
standards is observed.

All core production sites have standardised health and safety 
information boards, which include themes which align to the 
Framework and the Health and Safety Awards.

Replacement guarding fitted to machinery to prevent strike 
hazards from materials, with best practice shared across  
the Group.

All core production sites have implemented site-specific 
initiatives in relation to the management of external contractors 
and their compliance with Renold’s health and safety 
requirements.

Group-wide performance 
The Group uses a number of KPIs to monitor performance. 
Each Board meeting considers a comprehensive report from the 
Group Risk and Assurance function, which includes a rolling analysis 
of a range of KPIs along with other relevant criteria. Examples are 
provided on this page showing performance for the five years to 
31 March 2019. Performance in 2019 shows an increase in accidents 
in the year ended 31 March 2019, following an improving trend over 
previous years. The indicators below have been affected by: 

 •
 •
 •

One accident (>200 days lost) totalling 270 days lost time.

Two accidents (100–200 days lost) totalling 234 lost time days.

Five accidents (30–100 days lost) totalling 272 days.

As a result, there is a focus across all locations on:

 •

 •
 •

A Risk Assessment Programme to support the ongoing 
identification of all site hazards.

Reviewing all processes associated with identified hazards.

Implementing a safe system of work to mitigate  
identified hazards.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

15.6

LOST TIME ACCIDENT FREQUENCY RATES1
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

7.0
7.1

5.8

15.2

TREND OF REPORTABLE INCIDENTS2

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

887
777

455

2,060

1,909

LOST TIME DAYS1

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

806

308

190
248

1,126

1 

2 

 Lost time accident frequency rate = (no. of lost time days in the 
12-monthperiod/total hours worked in the 12-month period) x 1,000,000.

 Trend of reportable injury rates = (no. of lost days from accidents greater 
than three lost days divided by average number of employees in the 
12-month period) x 100,000. Note that while accidents greater than seven 
days are reportable events in the UK, Renold monitors both three and seven.

39

22/08/2019   17:28:22

Renold 2019-AR.indd   39

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

 
 
 
STRATEGIC REPORT

Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility

We remain committed to ensuring that our business activities are conducted in a responsible 
manner for the benefit of our customers, our people, our local communities, our partners and 
our investors.

Our Commitments

Provide a rewarding and safe working environment

Work in accordance with our values

Act in an ethical manner in all our business 
relationships

Work with the communities in which we operate

Minimise the environmental impact of our products 
and processes

The Board is mindful of the importance to the business of its 
responsibility to stakeholders and the wider community. Our 
approach to corporate social responsibility has three key elements: 
our people, our community and our environment. The commitment 
to our people includes the provision of a rewarding and safe 
environment for our employees and the way in which we work 
according to our Values.

Detailed information in relation to health and safety matters is 
reported upon at pages 38 and 39 of this Annual Report. 

The Board has overall responsibility for corporate social responsibility 
with the Chief Executive taking direct leadership responsibility 
supported by the regional and business unit Executive teams.

Aligned to this is our continuous commitment to uphold good 
corporate governance principles, in respect of which further details 
are set out in our Corporate Governance Report on pages 50 to 56.

Our People
The Group requires motivated, talented employees, with a clear 
understanding of their role within the business to deliver our 
Strategic Objectives. Consequently, Renold remains focused on the 
delivery of actions in the areas set out below.

Talent acquisition and optimisation of 
organisation structures 
As in previous years, the Group has continued to review and 
strengthen the management team and organisation structures,. The 
business has increasingly been able to focus on clarifying, developing 
and strengthening the capability of management and staff at deeper 
levels in the organisation. 

During the year, we have continued to evolve our recruitment 
processes to enable the sourcing and assessment of high-calibre 
people at the right time into well-defined roles with clear deliverables 
and accountabilities. We have developed a leadership competency 
framework to enable us to focus on the competencies and behaviours 
that are critical to a job role and seek to objectively and accurately 
assess potential candidates against these factors. We continue to 
apply a more rigorous use of core ability assessments in areas such 
as numerical and verbal reasoning, and the insistence on standards 
of high performance in these areas is beginning to bear fruit. We will 
continue to refine and standardise our capability in this area in the 
coming financial year. 

As in the past, Renold invests in programmes to develop ‘home grown’ 
talent and we continue to operate our apprenticeship programmes, 
particularly in the UK and Germany. 

The UK currently has eight apprentices within our Torque 
Transmission business. Our Chain business in Einbeck, Germany, 
continues with 17 apprentices working across a broad range of levels 
and disciplines including engineering, technical, administration and 
logistics functions. 

Renold continues to invest in our Future Leaders Graduate 
Programme. Each of these graduate Future Leaders has had a real 
job in the organisation from their first day of employment and are 
participants in a structured programme of training and development 
with 12 training modules being delivered by external experts over a 
two-year period. These modules aim to provide participants with a 
broad range of skills and knowledge to act as a base upon which they 
can further develop as their careers progress. Additionally, they have 
the opportunity to be involved in critical business projects and have 
regular exposure to the senior leadership team. This year we were 
able to expand the programme to include a Future Leader outside 
the UK, being based in the United States. This is a trend we plan to 
continue. The Future Leaders programme is beginning to bear fruit as 
we have four of our participants on overseas assignments and many 
others directly involved in key activity across the Group. 

We expect this programme to be one of the key processes through 
which the business continues to ensure that we internally develop 
our leaders of the future. The intention is to continue to invest in this 
programme and we expect another intake of Future Leaders in the 
next financial year.

We continue to evolve and broaden our Talent Review Process through 
a review of our people in critical areas of the business. We assess both 
the performance and the longer-term potential of key individuals and 
their teams. Based on these assessments, we prioritise meaningful 
actions to enable organisational improvement. In future years, this 
process will continue to evolve, taking into account the global nature 
of our business, enabling us to create a straightforward, practical and 
continuous improvement ethos in the area of talent development.

40

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   40

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:23

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Our Values

Operate with integrity

Value our people

Work together to achieve excellence

Accept accountability

Be open-minded

VALUES, BEHAVIOUR AND ENGAGEMENT 

The Renold Values and Behaviours continue to act as an important 
standard to which we hold both ourselves and our employees. 
Since the launch of the Renold Values we have continued the work 
of embedding these in the business.

The Values and Behaviours are clearly communicated across the 
Group and are increasingly becoming integrated into the way in 
which we do things. In particular, we have focused on ensuring 
that our recruitment methodology incorporates our Values and 
Behaviours and that we specifically seek future hires who are able 
to demonstrate alignment with these desirable traits. The Values 
and Behaviours have also been incorporated into our Performance 
and Development Review Process. 

Across our global locations we continue to align the requirement 
to embed Organisational Values and Behaviours in the terms 
and conditions of employment. The importance of our Values is 
emphasised during the induction process for new employees.

We plan to continue to focus on the process of further embedding 
our Values and Behaviours in the business as Renold continues to 
develop, ensuring that, for the long term, our Values and Behaviours 
shape our evolving culture. 

COMPLIANCE 

Arrangements for consulting and involving Group employees 
on matters affecting their interests at work are developed in 
ways appropriate to each business. A variety of approaches is 
adopted, aimed at encouraging the involvement of employees in 
effective communication and consultation, and the contribution 
of productive ideas at all levels.

The Group’s intranet site enables access to the latest Group 
information as well as Group policies. We also undertake regular 
presentations to employees throughout the Group where the half-
year and year-end financial results are presented and explained by 
senior management. This helps to achieve a common awareness 
among employees of the financial and economic factors affecting 
the performance of the Group. 

Employment policies are designed to provide equal opportunities 
irrespective of race, national origin, religion, age, disability, gender, 
marital status, sexual orientation or political affiliation. 

We monitor developments in employment law that may affect our 
employees in the regions in which we operate and make adjustments 
as necessary. 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   41

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

41

22/08/2019   17:28:25

STRATEGIC REPORT

Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility

The Group has not been made aware of any incident in which the 
organisation’s activities have resulted in an abuse of human rights.

Following the introduction of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015, 
we have published a statement on our website which sets out the 
steps being taken by the Group to ensure that slavery and human 
trafficking are not taking place in the business or the supply chain 
relating to our goods. The Group is committed to ensuring that our 
business and business partners do not undertake any activity which 
contravenes the Modern Slavery Act.

DIVERSITY

The Group is committed to equal opportunities and operates a 
non-discriminatory working environment. We expect staff and job 
applicants to be treated equally regardless of age, race, religion, 
disability, gender or sexuality.

As at 31 March 2019, the Group employed 2,059 people including 
319 in the UK. Of the total number of employees 326 (16%) are female. 
The Company recognises the need to encourage and support more 
gender diversity throughout the employee population as well as at 
Board level.

BUSINESS INTEGRITY AND ETHICS 

We operate the business in an ethical and responsible manner and we 
expect our employees and business operations to conduct themselves 
ethically, and to be honest, fair and courteous in their dealings.

The highest standards of ethical business conduct are required of our 
employees in the performance of their duties. Employees may not 
engage in conduct or activity that may raise questions as to Renold’s 
honesty, impartiality, reputation or otherwise cause embarrassment 
to the Group. Our employees are required to neither offer nor accept 
improper and/or illegal gifts, hospitality or payments in accordance 
with the Group Gifts and Hospitality policy.

Every Renold employee has the responsibility to ask questions, 
seek guidance and report suspected violations of the Group’s code 
of ethics. A free of charge, independent whistle-blowing hotline 
continues to be available to all employees across the Group, enabling 
them to report any concerns about theft, fraud and other malpractice 
in the workplace.

The Group is also committed to compliance with anti-corruption 
laws in all countries and operates a zero tolerance policy. 

The Group Anti-Corruption policy forms part of that commitment, 
together with the Gifts and Hospitality policy, both of which are 
designed to assist Renold employees in meeting corporate and 
individual obligations under anti-corruption laws and specifically 
the UK Bribery Act. 

Other control processes and updates to formal contractual 
arrangements with agents and distributors have been put in place 
to ensure compliance with the requirements of the UK Bribery Act. 

The underlying objective in all these measures is to maintain the 
highest standards of integrity throughout the business and ensure 
that all business dealings are transparent. 

Across the Group we have a well-established employee whistle-
blowing procedure. This is provided and managed by an external third 
party. Through this process employees are able to pass information 
to the senior leaders in the business about areas of concern to them. 
This can be done with full anonymity. The number of reports, the 
nature of them and the business response is regularly reviewed at 
senior management and Board level.

HUMAN RIGHTS

The Board has overall responsibility for ensuring the Group 
upholds and promotes respect for human rights and has adopted 
the definition of human rights within the European Convention on 
Human Rights: the concept of human beings as having universal 
rights, or status, regardless of legal jurisdiction or other localising 
factors, such as ethnicity, nationality, and sex. 

The Group respects all human rights and in conducting its business 
regards the right to non-discrimination and fair treatment as the 
most relevant to its key stakeholder groups, these being customers, 
employees and suppliers. The Group’s employment policies and 
procedures reflect principles of equal treatment. Respect for 
the individual is also enshrined in Renold’s statement of Values 
and Behaviours.

42

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   42

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:27

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Set out in the table below is a breakdown of the gender of employees as at 31 March 2019.

Board of Directors

Executive Management Team (excluding 
Directors)

Other senior managers1

Other employees

Total

As at 31 March 2019 

As at 31 March 2018

Male
6
100%

5
83%
25
89%
1,697
84%
1,733
84%

Female
–
–

1
17%
3
11%
322
16%
326
16%

Total
6

6

28

2,019

2,059

Male
6
100%

5
83%
28
90%
1,651
83%
1,690
83%

Female
–
–

1
17%
3
10%
350
17%
354
17%

Total
6

6

31

2,001

2,044

1 

 A senior manager is defined in the legislation as an employee who has responsibility for planning, directing or controlling the activities of a company or a 
strategically significant part of a company. While falling within the definition of ‘senior manager’, the most senior leadership population (below the Board), 
the Executive Management Team, is shown in a separate category.

OUR COMMUNITY

We aim to be a part of the communities in which we work and seek 
to assist local projects with support where possible. Although the 
Group is limited in our ability to provide extensive financial support 
to projects, we do seek to provide support where we can in a 
number of ways. 

We continue to support The Outwardbound Trust, an educational 
charity that uses the outdoors to help develop young people from all 
walks of life. This year we have identified a new school with which 
we will partner and, in addition to supporting their activities through 
the Outwardbound Trust, we propose to work with the school to 
provide support in other areas of pupil development. As well as 
supporting the amazing work that the Trust does, this will help with 
the engagement and development of our own employees.

We have also committed to a relationship with The Learning 
Partnership and are currently working to identify local schools 
to partner. The Learning Partnership provides inspirational 
and effective STEM learning programmes for schools in the 
UK, including the ‘Race To The Line’ model rocket car national 
competition, which we plan to support.

We are delighted to have been a supporter of the Museum 
of Science and Industry in Manchester over many years, and 
particularly through the support of the Manchester Science Festival. 
Each October, it attracts the best scientists from Manchester and 
beyond to showcase current research and promote the region’s 
rich heritage of innovation. 

In India, Renold has been working with communities and relevant 
stakeholders to assist local government schools in the provision 
of better infrastructure and educational facilities. Renold India’s 
‘Corporate Social Responsibility Vision’ has been formulated in 
connection with the statutory requirement in India. The areas listed 
in the statute include promoting education. Renold India believes that 
education is the tool for creating an empowered, enlightened society. 
More than 60% of children in India are enrolled in government 
schools; however, the infrastructure and facilities and quality of the 
education are often below acceptable levels. Through better facilities 
and higher quality education all round it is anticipated there will be 
a reduction in the dropout rate of students. This year Renold India 
assisted the local Government Aided School with the construction 
of a compound wall for the safety and security of the children.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   43

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

43

22/08/2019   17:28:28

 
STRATEGIC REPORT

Sustainability
Our Environment

The environmental impact of our activities is at the forefront of 
our strategy. Across all our operations, we meet all legislative 
requirements concerning environmental issues, including those 
relating to energy usage. As a part of the Group’s commitment 
to minimising the impacts of its business operations on the 
environment, we co-operate with regulators, suppliers, neighbours 
and customers to develop and achieve improved standards of 
environmental protection. All of our production facilities either hold 
or are working towards ISO 14001.

During the year, a range of projects have delivered further 
environmental improvements. These include:

 •

 •

The implementation of an Environmental Aspects Registry at 
Westfield to monitor and reduce environmental impact.

A reduction of electricity consumption at Einbeck by generated 
electricity through two combined heat and power plants.

Our ongoing programme of investment in new equipment will 
continue to bring further efficiencies over the coming year. 

Energy Saving Opportunities Scheme (ESOS)
ESOS is a mandatory energy assessment scheme for organisations in 
the UK that meet the qualification criteria. The Environment Agency 
is the UK scheme administrator.

Renold qualifies for ESOS and must carry out ESOS assessments 
every four years. These assessments are audits of the energy used in 
our buildings, industrial processes and transport to identify cost-
effective energy-saving measures. 

To deliver our obligations under Phase 2 of the ESOS legislation, we 
opted to undertake an ESOS Energy Survey. A specialist consultancy 
was appointed to assist the Company in completing the survey in April 
2019. The reported findings are being used to inform the development 
of a series of energy reduction and management measures.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Renold continues to comply with its obligations under the carbon 
reporting requirements.

Energy usage across the Group is collated using data captured 
through the Group’s Integrated Risk Management web-based IT 
system. This energy consumption database makes data readily 
available. Data is actively reviewed in order to target additional 
energy reduction programmes.

The main contributors to GHG emissions arise from our use of 
electricity and fuels, such as natural gas and fuel oil, burnt on  
our premises.

The table below shows the Group’s GHG data in tonnes for the last 
five financial years across all locations (derived from the consumption 
data collected and the DEFRA and International Energy Agency 
published conversion factor tables) along with energy consumption 
data which is being provided for the first time this year..

Renold continues to sustain an underlying reduction in energy usage. 
Related cross-site initiatives include:

Proactive waste reduction projects;

 •
 •
 • More efficient production arising from investment.

Low energy lighting; and

44

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   44

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:30

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Scope 11
Scope 22
Total annual GHG emissions3 on (tCO2e)
Emissions Intensity4

Energy consumption (m kWh)

Total Scope 1 fuel usage

Total overseas Scope 1 fuel usage

Total electricity usage

Total overseas electricity usage

2015
9,750
20,503
30,253
165.8

2016
8,097
18,012
26,109
158.1

2017
9,104
19,264
28,368
154.5

2018
8,258
17,667
25,925
135.3

2019
9,044
17,689
26,733
132.0

48.3

44.9

34.6

30.9

1 

2 

3 

4 

 Scope 1 emissions are from those direct sources that are owned by the Group (e.g. from direct combustion of natural gas within our facilities’ boilers and 
heaters). Fugitive gases are not included. 

 Scope 2 emissions comprise those emissions for which the Group is indirectly responsible, excluding transmission and distribution losses (e.g. from the 
electricity we purchase to operate machinery or equipment). An amendment made during 2015 to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol incorporates two calculation 
methodologies for scope 2 emissions. There are no contractual instruments in place for the purchase of renewable energy. Hence, we report the same figure 
when applying the market and location-based methodologies.

 The calculation methodology is based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol developed jointly by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for 
Sustainable Development. 

 The UK Government guidance was considered when selecting the Company’s chosen intensity measurement which is total emissions reported normalised to £m 
external revenue.

Strategic Report approval
The Strategic Report, on pages 6 to 45, incorporates: Market Review, Business Model, Our Customer Journey, Strategy, Chief Executive’s Review, 
Our Key Performance Indicators, Our Performance, Finance Director’s Review, Our Risks, Principal Risks and Uncertainties, Viability Statement 
and Sustainability and was approved by the Board on 23 August 2019.

For and on behalf of the Board 
ANDREW BATCHELOR 
COMPANY SECRETARY

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the revisions outlined in Note 28)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   45

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

45

22/08/2019   17:28:32

GOVERNANCE

Chairman’s Letter

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN

The Board is committed to maintaining 
high standards of corporate 
governance and behaviour and 
recognises that good governance is 
critical to long-term business success.

Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board I am pleased to present the Governance 
Report for the year ended 31 March 2019.

This section of the Annual Report and Accounts highlights the Group’s 
governance processes, alongside the work of the Board and Board 
Committees. We explain our approach to corporate governance 
and provide the information required of us by the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2016 (2016 Code) which applies to the Company 
for this reporting period. The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 
(2018 Code) while published applies to companies for financial 
periods commencing after 1 January 2019. The Board has not 
adopted the 2018 Code for the year ending 31 March 2019. Following 
shareholder approval for the move to AIM at the General Meeting 
on 8 May 2019, upon admission to AIM the Company will adopt the 
governance regime of the Quoted Companies Alliance. However, as 
outlined in the circular to shareholders, the Board intends to operate 
the Company’s reporting and governance in substantially the same 
manner as at present.

The Group’s principal risks and uncertainties are described in the 
Strategic Report and that section of the Annual Report and Accounts 
also forms part of the Governance Report.

We appreciate the importance of upholding the principles of good 
corporate governance, not only for compliance purposes, but because 
we recognise that good governance reduces risk and adds value to 
the business.

Historical misstatement of results
A review of the Gears business unit was initially undertaken following 
comments made by the Auditor to the Audit Committee regarding 
application of accounting controls in the business unit. Upon the 
discovery of misstatement of results for the business unit, the Board 
immediately initiated an independent internal audit investigation, 
supported by PwC. This investigation identified an overstatement of 
certain asset values and an under-recognition of certain liabilities for 
the years ended 31 March 2017, 2018 and 2019.

The independent investigation concluded that the misstatement 
was a result of an intentional misreporting of financial information 
at a local level, in addition to manipulating and adjusting reports 
and reconciliations in order to support the incorrect reporting. 
The misstatement comprised many adjustments across a number 
of balance sheet categories, including fixed assets, inventory, 
receivables, payables and cash.

The cumulative effect of these misstatements resulted in net assets 
at 31 March 2019 being overstated by £2.5m, and adjusted operating 
profit in the year to 31 March 2019 being overstated by £1.0m.

The Board, in conjunction with the Audit Committee acted swiftly 
to fully investigate these matters. The areas of focus for this year 
for both the Board and the Audit Committee include reviewing the 
robustness of the internal control environment, taking into account 
the findings of the independent investigation and recommendations 
from the Auditor, and ensuring that improvements are implemented.

Board composition
This year has been a period of change for the Board. John Allkins 
retired from the Board at the 2018 AGM after ten years in his role and 
we welcomed Tim Cooper to the Board as a Non-Executive Director. 

Tim joined the Board on 14 November 2018 and was appointed to all 
Board Committees.

Our Senior Independent Director, Ian Griffiths, while having  
served nine years in office, has agreed to continue in office as 
the Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Remuneration 
Committee until the AGM in 2020 to allow an orderly transition 
to Tim whom it is intended will take over the role of Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee.

Tone from the top
The Board continues to strongly believe in operating to the highest 
standards of ethical business conduct and in the importance of 
setting the right ‘tone from the top’. These principles are reflected in 
the statement of our Values and Behaviours and Renold requires the 
same from all employees in the performance of their duties. 

We continue to be mindful of developments in legislation, regulations 
and codes of practice of relevance to corporate governance and 
ethics. We are particularly alert to the Financial Reporting Council’s 
proposed reforms to the 2016 Code and that resultant reforms will 
need to be taken into account in planning for the future.

In addition to matters of corporate governance and ethics, the key 
priority for the Board remains the delivery of the Step 2020 Strategic 
Plan. On page 53 of our Corporate Governance Report we set out the 
areas of focus for the Board this year and highlight the links between 
the issues considered and the Group’s Strategic Objectives. 

Annual General Meeting 
Our AGM will be held at 11.00am on Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at the 
Manchester International Office Centre, Styal Road, Wythenshawe, 
Manchester, M22 5WB. We are pleased to receive feedback from 
shareholders at all times and I would encourage our shareholders to 
attend the AGM.

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

46

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   46

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:32

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code

The Group is committed to high standards of 
corporate governance in order to facilitate 
efficient, effective and entrepreneurial 
management of the Company. The Board 
acknowledges its contribution to achieving 
management accountability, improving risk 
management and ultimately to creating 
shareholder value over the longer term. 

In this report, we explain the Group’s approach 
to corporate governance and provide the 
information required of us by the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2016 (2016 Code) which 
applies to the Company for this reporting period. 
The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, 
whilst published, applies to financial periods 
commencing after 1 January 2019.

The Board’s compliance for the year ended 31 March 2019 is therefore 
measured against the requirements of the 2016 Code. 

The 2016 Code sets out guidance for companies with a premium 
listing in the form of main principles and specific provisions of good 
governance. The rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) 
require UK-listed companies to disclose how they have applied those 
principles and whether they have complied with the provisions 
throughout the financial year.

The obligation of all listed companies is to comply with the provisions 
of the UK Corporate Governance Code, or to explain why it has 
not done so. The Board considers that the Company has complied 
with all provisions set out in the 2016 Code that are applicable to it 
throughout the year ended 31 March 2019, except where highlighted 
in this section. 

The 2016 Code is available to view on the Financial Reporting 
Council’s (FRC) website, www.frc.org.uk.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   47

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

47

22/08/2019   17:28:34

GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

The Board provides 
entrepreneurial 
leadership of the 
Company within 
a framework 
of prudent and 
effective controls 
which enables risk 
to be assessed and 
managed. 

On these pages, we set out the 
age, tenure and biographical 
details of each Board member.

MARK HARPER 

CHAIRMAN

Committee memberships:
N        

Appointment to the Board: 
May 2012

Experience 
Mark, aged 63, was appointed 
to the Board as a Non-Executive 
Director and Chairman-elect 
on 1 May 2012. He took on the 
role of Chairman at the close 
of the AGM on 12 July 2012. 
His appointment was extended 
on 1 May 2018 to May 2021. 
Prior to joining Renold, Mark 
became the Chief Executive of 
Filtrona plc at the time of its 
demerger from Bunzl plc in 
June 2005 and led a successful 
period of growth until his 
retirement in May 2011. He 
also held a number of senior 
operational management 
positions within Bunzl plc, 
being appointed to the Bunzl 
plc Board in September 2004 
and has previously acted as a 
Non-Executive Director of BBA 
Aviation plc.

COMMITTEE  
MEMBERSHIPS KEY:
A   Audit Committee 

N        

  Nomination Committee 

N         R   Remuneration Committee 

E

   Executive Risk 
Management and 
Monitoring Committee

ROBERT PURCELL 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

IAN SCAPENS

FINANCE DIRECTOR

Committee memberships:
E

Committee memberships:
E

Appointment to the Board:
January 2013

Appointment to the Board:
January 2017

Experience 
Robert, aged 57, joined the 
Group on 21 January 2013 
as Chief Executive. Prior to 
joining Renold, Robert was 
Managing Director of Filtrona 
plc’s Protection and Finishing 
Products Division. He has also 
held a Managing Director role 
at Low and Bonar plc within its 
technical textiles business. His 
early career was in operational 
management within Courtaulds 
plc, during which time he gained 
an MBA from the Cranfield 
School of Management.

Experience 
Ian, aged 45, joined the Group 
on 3 January 2017 as Group 
Finance Director. Ian has 
extensive experience in all 
aspects of finance in large 
complex organisations. He 
joined Renold from Keepmoat 
Group, where he had been 
Deputy Chief Financial Officer 
since June 2015. Previously, Ian 
spent ten years at Speedy Hire 
Plc, latterly as Group Financial 
Controller, from 2010 to 2015. 
Ian is a member of the Institute 
of Chartered Accountants of 
England and Wales.

48

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   48

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:36

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

IAN GRIFFITHS 

DAVID LANDLESS

TIM COOPER

ANDREW BATCHELOR

SENIOR INDEPENDENT NON-
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Committee memberships:
N         R
A N        

Appointment to the Board:
January 2010

Experience 
Ian, aged 68, was appointed 
to the Board in January 2010 
and became Chairman of the 
Remuneration Committee 
in November 2010. His 
appointments to both were 
extended in January 2016 and 
on 19 July 2017 he became 
the Senior Independent 
Non-Executive Director. Ian is 
a Non-Executive Director of 
Autins plc, and Non-Executive 
Chairman of Trackwise Designs 
Plc, both of which are listed 
on the AIM Market of the 
London Stock Exchange. He 
has also been a Non-Executive 
Director and Chairman of 
Hydro International plc and a 
Non-Executive Director of Ultra 
Electronics Holdings plc. Ian has 
also previously held Executive 
Director roles at Royal Mail 
Letters where he was Managing 
Director and was a Director of 
Royal Mail Holdings plc and at 
GKN plc and GKN Holdings plc 
where he was Group Managing 
Director, GKN Automotive.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

GROUP GENERAL COUNSEL AND 
COMPANY SECRETARY

Appointment:
July 2018

Experience 
Andrew, aged 53, was 
appointed to his role in July 
2018. Andrew has extensive 
experience in private practice, 
becoming a partner with the 
law firm Edge Ellison then 
continuing his career in-house 
as the General Counsel and/
or Company Secretary to a 
variety of UK main market 
listed companies. His previous 
roles include JD Sports Fashion 
Plc, Promethean World Plc and 
Itnet plc. Andrew has also held 
the roles of Head of Risk and 
General Counsel for the large 
private company retailer, Wilko. 

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Committee memberships:
N         R
A N        

Committee memberships:
N         R
A N        

Appointment to the Board:
January 2017 

Appointment to the Board:
November 2018

Experience 
David, aged 59, was appointed 
to the Board as a Non-Executive 
Director on 9 January 2017 and 
became Chairman of the Audit 
Committee from 19 July 2017. 
David, a fellow of the Chartered 
Institute of Management 
Accountants, has significant 
experience at senior levels of 
international businesses in 
the industrials sector. He was 
most recently Group Finance 
Director of Bodycote plc from 
1999 until his retirement on 1 
January 2017. Prior to that, he 
held a range of finance roles for 
15 years at Courtaulds in the 
UK and US, latterly as Finance 
Director of Courtaulds Coatings 
(Holdings) Ltd, from 1997 to 
1999. David is currently a Non-
Executive Director of European 
Metal Recycling Limited, a large 
private scrap metal recycling 
company, the Non-Executive 
Chairman of Luxfer Holdings 
plc and a Non-Executive 
Director and chair of the Audit 
Committee of Innospec Inc.

Experience 
Tim, aged 60, was appointed 
as a Non-Executive Director 
of Renold in November 2018. 
Tim is an Executive Director of 
Victrex Plc, a position he has 
held since October 2012. Tim 
joined Victrex in January 2010 
as Managing Director of Victrex 
Polymer Solutions. Tim has 
over 30 years of international 
business management and 
commercial experience, having 
held senior leadership positions 
in a number of industries. Prior 
to joining Victrex, Tim was with 
Umeco Plc, initially as Managing 
Director of Aerovac Systems 
Ltd, but later becoming Group 
Managing Director of Umeco 
Composites Process Materials. 
He has been Managing Director 
of Tellermate Plc and Avery 
Berkel Ltd having developed his 
international career with GEC, 
BP and Land Rover.

49

22/08/2019   17:28:38

Renold 2019-AR.indd   49

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

GOVERNANCE

Corporate  
Governance Report

Compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code

The Group is committed to high standards of corporate governance 
in order to facilitate efficient, effective and entrepreneurial 
management of the Company. The Board acknowledges its 
contribution to achieving management accountability, improving risk 
management and ultimately to creating shareholder value over the 
longer term.

The 2016 Code sets out guidance for companies with a premium 
listing in the form of main principles and specific provisions of good 
governance. The rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) 
require UK-listed companies to disclose how they have applied those 
principles and whether they have complied with the provisions 
throughout the financial year.

In this report, we explain the Group’s approach to corporate 
governance and provide the information required of us by the UK 
Corporate Governance Code 2016 (2016 Code) which applies to the 
Company for this reporting period. The UK Corporate Governance 
Code 2018, whilst published, applies to financial periods commencing 
after 1 January 2019. The Board’s compliance is therefore measured 
against the requirements of the 2016 Code.

The obligation of all listed companies is to comply with the provisions 
of the UK Corporate Governance Code, or to explain why it has 
not done so. The Board considers that the Company has complied 
with all provisions set out in the 2016 Code that are applicable to it 
throughout the year ended 31 March 2019, except where highlighted 
in this report.

The 2016 Code is available to view on the Financial Reporting 
Council’s (FRC) website, www.frc.org.uk.

Board composition, responsibilities and activities

Membership of the Board
During the financial year, John Allkins retired as a Director at the 2018 
AGM and in November 2018, Tim Cooper joined the Board as a Non-
Executive Director. To provide a programme of orderly succession, 
Ian Griffiths will continue in his role as Chairman of the Remuneration 
Committee until the 2020 AGM.

Experience of the Board
The members of the Board maintain the appropriate balance of 
status, experience, independence and knowledge of the Company to 
enable them to discharge their respective duties and responsibilities 
and to ensure the Board is of a sufficient size that the requirements 
of the business can be met.

The Board continues to have a balance of Executive and Non-
Executive Directors. Currently, the Board comprises a Non-Executive 
Chairman, three Non-Executive Directors and two Executive Directors 
as shown below.

The Board’s consideration of its composition in the context of its 
diversity is set out in the Nomination Committee Report on pages 
64 and 65.

The below graphic shows the number of Directors with significant 
experience in the areas listed.

Financial management 
and corporate finance

HSE

4

3

1

Non-Executive
Chairman

Non-Executive
Directors

3

6
Members

2

Executive
Directors

Manufacturing
and engineering
sector

5

International
experience

5

–
HR

Strategy
development

6

3

Sales and marketing

3
Corporate governance

50

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   50

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:38

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Responsibilities of the Board
The Board is collectively responsible for the effective oversight of the 
Group and its businesses. 

In addition, it is responsible for strategic business planning, 
including reviewing succession planning, risk management and 
the development of Group policies in areas such as health, safety 
and environmental matters and Directors’ and senior managers’ 
remuneration and ethics. The Executive Directors have authority to 
deal with all other matters affecting the Group.

The Board has approved a schedule of reserved matters to ensure 
that it takes all major strategy, policy and investment decisions 
affecting the Group. As part of the Board’s oversight of operations, it 
must ensure maintenance of a sound system of internal control and 
risk management. 

Feedback is provided to the Board following presentations to investors 
and meetings with shareholders in order to ensure that its members, 
and in particular Non-Executive Directors, develop an understanding of 
the views of major shareholders about their Company.

Risk monitoring 
The Board has overall responsibility for implementing the Group’s 
system of internal control including financial, operational and 
regulatory compliance controls and risk management systems. 
The Board is also responsible for reviewing internal control 
effectiveness and compliance and accords with the FRC’s ‘Guidance 
on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and 
Business Reporting’.

The ongoing process for the review of the system of internal controls 
by the Directors has been in place for the whole of the year ended 
31 March 2019 and up to the date of approval of this report and the 
financial statements. 

Internal controls and the risk management processes are reviewed 
on a regular basis by the Audit Committee, which reports directly 
to the Board. This review includes a report from the Executive 
Risk Management and Monitoring Committee (ERMMC) after each 
meeting to the Audit Committee. 

This review includes a focus on areas such as risk appetite, the 
operations of risk management and internal control systems, and 
their integration with the Group’s strategy.

The Board has also reviewed and considered in detail the 
consequences of the control failings at the Gears business unit and 
the impact upon the Group’s financial results.

Further details about the composition and activities of the ERMMC 
and the Group’s risk management framework can be found on 
pages 30 to 31 of the Strategic Report. A description of the Audit 
Committee’s oversight of the ERMMC can be found in the Audit 
Committee Report on page 58.

Individual Directors’ key responsibilities 
The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are separated, with a clear division of responsibilities set out in writing and agreed by the Board.

TITLE

CHAIRMAN 
Mark Harper

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Robert Purcell

FINANCE DIRECTOR
Ian Scapens

SENIOR INDEPENDENT  
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Ian Griffiths

INDEPENDENT  
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
David Landless 
Tim Cooper

RESPONSIBILITY

To ensure the effectiveness of the Board in setting the direction of the Company and 
the agenda of the Board.

To manage the business and implement the strategy agreed by the Board.

To ensure sound financial management of the Group’s business and provide strategic 
and financial guidance to ensure that the Company’s financial commitments are met.

In addition to the role of an independent Non-Executive Director, to ensure that 
the views of each Non-Executive Director are given due consideration and act as a 
sounding board for the Chairman.

To constructively challenge the Executive Directors and help develop proposals on 
strategy, including satisfying themselves on the integrity of financial information 
and ensuring financial controls and systems of risk management are robust and 
defensible.

Board members are able to seek independent legal or other professional advice in respect of their duties as they may require at the Company’s 
expense, and have access to the advice and services of a Company Secretary, who ensures that Board procedures are complied with. 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   51

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

51

22/08/2019   17:28:38

GOVERNANCE

Corporate  
Governance Report

Board and Committee membership and attendance
The Board meets on a regular basis with an agenda and necessary 
papers for discussion distributed electronically in advance of each 
meeting via board portal software, Diligent. Agenda items are agreed 
in advance and set out in an annual planning schedule. The meetings 
are scheduled to coincide with the internal financial reporting 
timetable of the Company and key events including interim and final 
results, and the AGM.

The Board’s responsibilities are discharged by way of scheduled 
Board meetings. In addition, the Board reviews written reports in 
months where there is no meeting and convenes ad hoc meetings 
during the year in order to resolve matters by written resolutions 
to deal with specific business requirements.

The table below shows the number of meetings of the Board and 
its Committees during the year and individual attendance by Board 
and Committee members at those meetings. Seven core meetings 
have been held this year. In addition, the Board met for a separate 
full day to discuss the further evolution of the Group’s strategic plan. 
All Directors attended all core scheduled Board meetings, as can be 
seen in the table of attendance below.

Mark 
Harper

1

Robert 
2
Purcell

Ian
Scapens

2

Ian
Griffiths

John
Allkins

3

David
Landless

Tim
Cooper

4

7

4

3

6

–

7

4

3

5

3

7

4

3

6

3

7

4

3

6

–

3

2

1

3

–

7

4

3

6

–

2

1

1

2

–

BOARD

7 meetings 

AUDIT 
COMMITTEE

4 meetings

NOMINATION
COMMITTEE

3 meetings

REMUNERATION
COMMITTEE

6 meetings

ERMM
COMMITTEE

3 meetings

1  Mark Harper attended Audit and Remuneration Committee meetings or part thereof by invitation.

2 

3 

4 

52

Robert Purcell and Ian Scapens attended Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committee meetings or part thereof by invitation.

John Allkins attended all Board, Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committee meetings prior to his resignation in July 2019.

Tim Cooper attended all Board, Audit and Remuneration Committee meetings since his appointment in November 2018.

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   52

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:39

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Board focus during the year
During the year ended 31 March 2019, the Board has provided its main focus on the following matters:

READ MORE ABOUT OUR STRATEGY  
ON PAGES 12 AND 13

GOVERNANCE  
AND RISK

STRATEGY

LEADERSHIP

FINANCIAL 
STEWARDSHIP

Overview
 •

Implementation and 
reviewing compliance with 
the requirements of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code.
Ensure a sound system of 
internal control and risk 
management including 
review of the Group risk 
profile.

Responsibility for approval 
of the Group’s strategic aims 
and objectives and review of 
performance.
Approval of major capital 
projects and oversight of 
benefits expectation and 
delivery.

Responsibility for the overall 
leadership of the Group and 
setting the Group’s Values.
Setting the ‘tone from the 
top’.

Approval of financial 
reporting and controls. 
Approval of relevant policies.
Review of system of internal 
control.

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •
 •

1  Mark Harper attended Audit and Remuneration Committee meetings or part thereof by invitation.

2 

3 

4 

Robert Purcell and Ian Scapens attended Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committee meetings or part thereof by invitation.

John Allkins attended all Board, Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committee meetings prior to his resignation in July 2019.

Tim Cooper attended all Board, Audit and Remuneration Committee meetings since his appointment in November 2018.

SHAREHOLDER 
RELATIONS

 •

Ensuring a satisfactory 
dialogue with shareholders, 
including approval of key 
information to shareholders.

* See key on page 33.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •
 •
 •

 •
 •
 •
 •
 •

 •

 •

Activity in year
 •
 •

Consideration of the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Consideration of the Viability Statement and agreeing the Group’s 
risk profile, principal risks and uncertainties and risk appetite.
Review of the effectiveness of the risk management and internal 
control systems.
Conducting and reviewing an evaluation of the effectiveness of 
the Board and its Committees.

Board Strategy Day held to debate and discuss the Group’s 
strategic plan.
Continued review of STEP 2020 and supporting the Chief 
Executive in the evolution of the Group’s Strategic Plan.
Review of ERP effectiveness and monitoring progress of new ERP 
implementation.
Review of customer service enhancement initiatives including the 
‘Step 2 Service’ service improvement programme.
Oversight of programme to relocate Chain manufacturing facility 
in China.
Received presentations from Group senior management on 
operations and continued implementation of the Strategic Plan 
across the divisions and functions.
Considered and approved capital availability and extension of the 
Group’s borrowing facilities.
Considered and approved, for subsequent approval by 
shareholders, the cancellation of listing on the Official List and 
admission to trading on AIM.

 • Monitoring health and safety performance.
 •

Succession planning in relation to the Board and senior 
management.
Support to ongoing organisational development.

Review of investigation of issues identified at the Gears business 
unit.
Approval of the annual operating and capital expenditure 
budgets.
Review of monthly business performance reports.
Review of dividend policy.
Review and approval of the half-year and full-year results and 
related announcements.
Review and approval of the delegated authorities matrix.
Review and approval of the Group tax strategy.
Review of pension scheme de-risking initiatives.
Specific approval for major capital investment projects.
Review of matters affecting the Group involving material litigation 
or disputes.

Received and discussed feedback from roadshows and 
presentations to shareholders.
Approval of Annual Report and Accounts and information to 
shareholders for the AGM.

Renold 2019-AR.indd   53

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

Strategic 
objective*

1

7

2

4

6

1

3

5

7

1

6

5

2

7

53

22/08/2019   17:28:39

GOVERNANCE

Corporate  
Governance Report

Expected Board focus for next year
The Board will continue to review the areas set out in the chart on 
page 53. In addition, it is anticipated that the following areas will 
receive focus by the Board for the year ending 31 March 2020: 

 •

 •

 •

 •

Consider Board composition and succession planning, to include 
succession for senior management.

Review the Group’s governance structures to align with 
regulatory developments and evolving market practice.

Review the Group’s capital structure to ensure it supports the 
acquisition strategy.

Continue to monitor progress and governance of the  
strategic plan.

 • Monitor the progress of the ‘Step 2 Service’ programme against 

delivery of the programme objectives.

In light of the findings of the recent independent investigation into 
the accounting issues at the Gears business unit, the Board, in 
conjunction with the Audit Committee, will review the robustness 
of the internal control environment, taking into account the findings 
of the independent investigation including identified control 
weaknesses and work alongside Deloitte to ensure improvements are 
appropriately implemented.

Director induction and development
The training needs of the Board are discussed as part of the Board 
performance evaluation process. Updates are provided to the Board 
at regular intervals in order to refresh the Directors’ knowledge. 
Training is arranged primarily by the Company Secretary or the 
Group Finance Director in consultation with the Chairman. The Board 
has received an update from Deloitte LLP in relation to corporate 
governance best practice and developments. Remuneration advisers, 
PwC, have also provided updates to the Remuneration Committee in 
relation to market trends in executive remuneration.

The Company has a detailed framework for the induction of new 
Directors. This includes the issuing of all key documents relating to 
each new Director’s role on the Board, as well as site visits and face-
to-face meetings with senior executives. Throughout the year the 
Executive Directors have continued to visit Renold sites around the 
world including: the USA, India, China, Germany and Australia. The 
Board itself also met during the year at Renold’s manufacturing sites 
in Morristown and Westfield, USA and Einbeck in Germany.

Non-Executive Director independence
The Non-Executive Directors are considered to be independent in 
character and judgement, notwithstanding in the case of Ian Griffiths 
that he has served on the Board for more than nine years. The Board is 
of the opinion that all of the Directors take decisions objectively and in 
the best interests of the Company and that no individual or small group 
of individuals can dominate the Board’s decision-making. The balance 
between Non-Executive and Executive Directors allows independent 
challenge to the Executive Directors and senior management.

Board evaluation and effectiveness
The Board is supportive of the principle of evaluation of the Board, 
as set out in paragraph B.6 of the 2016 Code, and recognises that 
evaluation of its performance is important in enabling it to realise its 
maximum potential. A formal process for evaluating the performance 
of the Board, its members and its Committees is conducted annually. 
This process gives the Directors the opportunity to identify areas 
for improvement both jointly and individually through the use 
of questionnaires and/or open discussion. An evaluation of the 
Chairman is also carried out annually, led by the Senior Independent 
Non-Executive Director. 

In addition, evaluations of the Audit Committee, the Nomination 
Committee and the Remuneration Committee were also carried out 
during the year.

The evaluation process commences with the completion of a written 
questionnaire for each separate review, compilation of a summary 
of the results and feedback obtained and then discussion between 
the participants. The subsequent Board discussion highlighted a 
number of areas where objectives might be set by the Board and 
practical issues for consideration. The Board has continued to 
allocate separate time for review and consideration of the STEP 2020 
Strategic Plan.

In accordance with the 2016 Code, the evaluation process also 
included a number of discussions during the year between the 
Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors, without the Executive 
Directors present, to discuss feedback arising from the process and 
the performance of each Executive Director. The Senior Independent 
Director also met with the other Directors as part of the Chairman’s 
performance evaluation process.

Election of Directors
The 2016 Code recommends that all Directors of FTSE 350 companies 
should be subject to annual election by shareholders. This provision 
is not applicable to the Company. However, with a view to complying 
voluntarily with all terms of the 2016 Code where practical, all Non-
Executive Directors are subject to annual election.

54

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   54

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:39

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Governance 
structure

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

BOARD
The Board has ownership of global policies and is 
responsible for strategic business planning

Board Committees
Support the Board in its work with specific areas of review and oversight

Audit Committee

Remuneration Committee

Nomination Committee

Oversees the Company’s 
financial reporting and 
internal controls and their 
effectiveness, together 
with the procedures for 
identifying, assessing 
and reporting risks and 
mitigation. It also oversees 
the services provided by 
the external Auditor and its 
remuneration.

Determines remuneration 
policy and practices to 
attract, motivate and retain 
high-calibre Executive 
Directors and other senior 
employees to deliver 
performance for all our 
stakeholders and ensure a 
close alignment of executive 
pay to the Company’s 
Strategic Objectives and 
performance.

Responsible for considering 
the structure, size and 
composition of the Board 
and its Committees, and 
succession planning. It also 
identifies and proposes 
individuals to be Directors 
where new appointments 
are to be made and leads 
that process.

Executive Risk Management 
and Monitoring Committee

Led by the Chief Executive, 
the principal role of the 
Executive Risk Management 
and Monitoring Committee is 
to evaluate and manage the 
risks to the Group. Includes 
monitoring progress of the 
implementation of mitigating 
actions and controls.

GROUP MANAGEMENT TEAM
Implementation of the  
Group policies

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
The Chief Executive has responsibility for managing  
the business and implementing the strategy agreed 
by the Board

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

BUSINESS UNIT 
LEADERS

FUNCTIONAL 
LEADERS

FINANCE 
DIRECTOR

BUSINESS UNIT 
TEAMS

FUNCTIONAL TEAMS

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Biographical and experience details of the current Directors appear on pages 48 and 49. Further details of the Directors’ service contracts and 
letters of appointment are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   55

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

55

22/08/2019   17:28:39

GOVERNANCE

Corporate  
Governance Report

Key features of governance structures
The key features of the Group’s governance structures, as shown in 
the schematic on the prior page, are as follows:

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

The Board has approved a Corporate Governance Compliance 
Statement which contains terms of reference for the Board 
and each of the Board Committees. The terms of reference are 
available on the Company’s website, www.renold.com. Internal 
controls are in place at both local and Group level.

The ERMMC which oversees, on behalf of the Audit Committee 
and ultimately the Board, that appropriate policies are 
implemented to identify and evaluate risks.

An internal audit function which assists management and the 
Audit Committee in the fulfilment of the Board’s responsibility 
for ensuring that the Group’s financial and accounting systems 
provide accurate and up-to-date information about its current 
financial position while also permitting the accurate preparation 
of financial statements.

An organisational structure which supports clear lines of 
communication and tiered levels of authority.

A schedule of matters reserved for the Board’s approval to 
ensure it maintains control over appropriate strategic, financial, 
organisational and compliance issues.

The preparation of detailed annual financial plans covering profit 
and cash flow and the balance sheet, which are approved by the 
Board.

The review of detailed regular reports comparing actual 
performance with plans and of updated financial forecasts.

Procedures for the appraisal, approval and control of capital 
investment proposals.

Procedures for the appraisal, approval and control of acquisitions 
and disposals.

Access for all Group employees to a free of charge, independent 
whistle-blowing hotline enabling them to report any concerns 
about theft, fraud or other malpractice in the workplace.

The Board and its Committees
 •

The Board delegates authority to various Committees to deal 
with specific aspects of corporate governance. 

 •

 •

 •

These Committees are summarised on the prior page. Details 
about the structure and activities of each are set out in the 
separate Committee reports. The Committees communicate and 
work together where required. 

Committee membership may not be refreshed as frequently as 
would be the case for a company with a larger board. However, 
the Board is satisfied that no undue reliance is placed on 
particular individuals.

Terms of reference for each Committee, together with the 
schedule of matters reserved for the Board, are available on the 
Company’s website, www.renold.com.

Internal control
During the year ended 31 March 2019, the responsibility to review 
internal control effectiveness was delegated to the Audit Committee 
and reported to the Board as follows: 

 •

 •

 •

Receiving and considering regular reports from the internal audit 
function on the status of internal control across the Group;

Reviewing the internal audit function’s findings, annual audit plan 
and the resources available to it to perform its work; 

Reviewing the external Auditor’s findings on internal financial 
control; and 

 • Monitoring the adequacy and timeliness of management’s 

response to identified audit findings.

In addition, following identification of accounting issues in the Gears 
business unit, the Board has, in conjunction with the Audit Committee, 
initiated an independent investigation into the issues. As outlined in the 
earlier section on ‘Expected Board focus for next year’, the identified 
control weaknesses will be addressed as a matter of priority.

The executive team is accountable to the Directors for implementing 
Board policies on internal control and for monitoring and reporting to 
the Board that it has done so. 

Group internal controls are designed to mitigate rather than eliminate 
the risks identified and can provide only reasonable and not absolute 
assurance against material misstatement or loss.

Financial reporting
There are also established internal control systems in relation to the 
Company’s financial reporting process and the Group’s process for 
preparation of consolidated accounts. These systems include policies 
and procedures that: 

 •

 •

 •

 •

Relate to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, 
accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of 
assets; 

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as 
necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in 
accordance with IFRS; 

Require representatives of the businesses to certify that their 
reported information gives a true and fair view of the state of 
affairs of the business and its results for the period; and 

Review and reconcile reported data. 

The findings of the independent investigation report into the 
accounting issues in the Gears business unit have formed the basis 
of the revision of the 2019 Annual Report and Accounts and the 
restatement for the years ended 31 March 2017 and 31 March 2018.

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing these internal 
control systems.

Fair, balanced and understandable reporting
The Annual Report and Accounts taken as a whole must be fair, 
balanced and understandable (FBU). The process for ensuring the 
Annual Report and Accounts meets the FBU requirement involves  
it being reviewed in the first instance by a Disclosure Committee  
and subsequently the Audit Committee and the Board. Further details  
on this process are in the Audit Committee Report on page 58 and  
the Board’s responsibility statement for the FBU requirement is on 
page 87.

56

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   56

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:39

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Communications with shareholders

Annual General Meeting 
The AGM provides an opportunity for communication with private 
and institutional investors. Shareholders are encouraged to attend 
the AGM and we welcome their participation.

At the AGM, the Chairman of the Board and the three Non-Executive 
Directors (including therefore the chairmen of the Audit and 
Remuneration Committees), together with the Executive Directors, 
will be available to answer questions. The Chairman of the Board is 
also Chairman of the Nomination Committee and the Chief Executive 
chairs the Executive Risk Management and Monitoring Committee.

Notice of the AGM is sent to shareholders at least 21 business days 
before the meeting. Details of the proxy votes lodged on each 
resolution are made available and shareholders are invited to talk 
informally to the Directors after the formal proceedings.

The AGM will be held at 11.00am on Wednesday, 17 July 2019 at the 
Manchester International Office Centre, Styal Road, Wythenshawe, 
Manchester, M22 5WB. 

The Notice of Meeting will be sent to shareholders prior to the AGM. 
This will set out a detailed explanation of each item of business for 
consideration at the AGM. Shareholders who are unable to attend the 
AGM are encouraged to vote before the meeting by using the Proxy 
Card which will be sent with the Notice of Meeting.

All resolutions were passed at last year’s AGM.

Communications with shareholders are given high priority and 
are made in a number of ways. The Board is accountable to 
shareholders and therefore it is important for the Board to appreciate 
the requirements of shareholders and equally that shareholders 
understand how the actions of the Board and short-term financial 
performance relate to the achievement of longer-term goals. 
The Non-Executive Directors make themselves available to meet 
shareholders on request, can attend shareholder visits at Company 
sites and are available for discussions with analysts and the 
Company’s broker.

The reporting calendar is driven by the publication of interim and 
final results each year, in which the Board reports to shareholders 
on its management of the Company. Formal regulatory news service 
announcements are also made in accordance with the Company’s 
reporting obligations. Comments on Group financial performance in 
the context of the business risks faced and objectives and plans for 
the future are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 30 to 36.

The Company continues to keep shareholders informed of its 
strategy and progress at other times during the year, with updates 
provided to the London Stock Exchange and shareholders via the 
Company’s website, www.renold.com. The Board receives feedback 
from the Company’s brokers throughout the year. In addition, the 
Chief Executive and Finance Director meet with major shareholders 
and potential investors to discuss Group strategy and performance 
and update the Board as a whole at each meeting. The Board also 
receives reports prior to each Board meeting which set out the main 
changes to the composition of the Company’s share register.

The Senior Independent Non-Executive Director does not generally 
attend meetings with shareholders although he makes himself 
available to attend such meetings if and when required. While the 
Company is not in compliance with paragraph E1.1 of the 2016 Code, 
the Chairman ensures that the Chief Executive and Finance Director 
provide feedback to the Board following presentations to investors, 
and meetings with shareholders and analysts. Brokers’ briefings are 
also circulated to all Directors in order to ensure that Board members, 
and in particular Non-Executive Directors, develop an understanding of 
the views of major shareholders about their Company.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   57

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

57

22/08/2019   17:28:39

GOVERNANCE

Audit Committee  
Report

DAVID LANDLESS
CHAIRMAN OF THE 
AUDIT COMMITTEE

The identification of 
accounting issues in the 
Gears business unit has 
been frustrating and deeply 
disappointing. The Audit 
Committee will ensure 
that identified control 
recommendations are 
implemented quickly and 
effectively.

Key objectives
In support of the Board’s duty of stewardship, the Committee aims 
to ensure appropriate corporate governance is applied to the Group’s 
systems of internal control, risk management, financial reporting, 
internal audit and other compliance matters such as UK anti-
bribery legislation. We monitor the integrity of financial information 
published externally for use by shareholders. We also ensure that 
the integrity of the financial statements is supported by an effective 
external audit.

We monitor that effective control structures operate over major 
change initiatives and targeted benefits are measured and delivered. 
We also support the efforts of the executive team to continuously 
improve the financial control and risk monitoring environment. Our 
approach is to ensure that risk management operates to pre-empt 
potential business issues and that embedded proactive financial 
controls prevent or mitigate unnecessary losses that may arise if a 
business risk does crystallise.

Historical misstatement of results
A review of the Gears business unit was initially undertaken following 
comments made by the Auditor to the Audit Committee regarding 
application of accounting controls in the business unit. Upon the 
discovery of misstatement of results for the business unit, the Board 
immediately initiated an independent internal audit investigation, 
supported by PwC, and reporting directly to the Audit Committee. 

This investigation identified an overstatement of certain asset values 
and an under-recognition of certain liabilities for the years ended 31 
March 2017, 2018 and 2019.

The independent investigation concluded that the misstatement was 
a result of an intentional overstatement across a number of balance 
sheet categories, including fixed assets, inventory, receivables, payables 
and cash, and across a number of years. These overstatements and 
adjustments were supported by a number of falsified reports and 
reconciliations and were perpetrated at a local level. 

These revised Annual Report and Accounts have corrected for these 
misstatements through revisions for the year ended 31 March 2019 
and through prior period restatements for the years ended 31 March 
2017 and 2018. These are outlined in more detail in Notes 27 and 28.

As a result of these events, we have identified a number of internal 
control improvements which will be implemented as soon as 
practicable. Further, as outlined later in this report, the Committee 
will be reviewing the robustness of the internal control environment, 
taking into account the findings of the independent investigation and 
recommendations from the Auditor. The Committee will ensure that 
improvements to the internal control environment are implemented 
quickly and effectively.

Governance
The terms of reference of the Audit Committee were reviewed during 
the year and have been updated to reflect the proposed re-listing on 
AIM. The terms of reference are available on the Company’s website, 
www.renold.com.

Responsibilities 
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in 
fulfilling its responsibilities with regard to financial reporting, external 
and internal audit, risk management and controls. The Committee’s 
responsibilities include:

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

Reviewing the Group’s financial results, announcements and 
financial statements.

Reporting to the Board on the appropriateness of existing 
accounting policies and their application across the Group.

As a matter of course, confirming that the Going Concern basis 
remains appropriate for the financial statements and advising the 
Board on the Viability Statement.

Advising the Board on the application of any new or modified 
accounting and reporting standards.

Advising the Board on the adequacy of the processes required 
to confirm that the Annual Report and Accounts, when taken 
as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and include 
the information necessary to allow shareholders to assess the 
Group’s performance, business model and strategy.

Overseeing the internal audit function and its effectiveness by 
reviewing the annual internal audit plan, identifying specific areas 
of focus for new or emerging business risks and receiving internal 
audit reports.

Oversight of the relationship with, and effectiveness of, the 
external Auditor, including the appointment and, where 
appropriate, reappointment of the external Auditor.

Assessing and making recommendations to the Board on 
the activities and performance of the Group’s Executive Risk 
Management and Monitoring Committee (ERMMC).

58

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   58

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:40

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 •

 •

Reviewing and reporting to the Board on the Group’s internal 
control and compliance processes.

Reviewing the procedures for responding to whistle-blowing, 
fraud or potential breaches of anti-bribery legislation. This 
includes oversight of any and all reports summarising the 
concerns raised, how they were investigated and the response to 
the same.

 •

Reporting to the Board at regular intervals on how the Committee 
is discharging its responsibilities.

Composition
The Committee, of which I am the Chairman, consists of  
three Non-Executive Directors. Ian Griffiths, the Senior Independent  
Non-Executive Director, was a member of the Committee throughout 
the year. John Allkins was Chairman of the Committee until his 
retirement as a Non-Executive Director at the 2018 AGM. Following 
his appointment to the Board in November 2018, Tim Cooper was 
appointed to the Committee.

At all times, the Committee complied with the requirements of the 
2016 Code for a smaller company, this being to have at least two 
independent Non-Executive members. 

AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND MEETINGS ATTENDED

Position

Names
David Landless Chairman
John Allkins

Ian Griffiths
Tim Cooper

Non-Executive Director (resigned July 
2018)
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director (appointed 
November 2018)

Meetings 
attended
4 of 4
2 of 4

4 of 4
1 of 4

Biographical details and experience of members are set out on pages 
48 and 49.

Expertise
The Committee members have been selected to give an appropriate 
range of financial, operational, commercial and risk management 
expertise to allow the Committee to fulfil its duties. The Board 
considers that I have recent and relevant financial experience to 
perform the role of Committee Chairman.

Committee meetings
The Committee meets at least four times each year. During the year 
ended 31 March 2019 the Committee met four times. The meetings 
are attended by the independent Non-Executive Directors (the 
members), the Company Secretary and, by invitation, the Chairman, 
the Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director, the Group Head of 
Risk and Assurance and the Group Financial Controller. Full details 
of Director attendance during the year are set out in the table of all 
Committee meetings on page 52.

From time to time, other members of the Group’s management team 
are invited to attend to present or respond to queries on particular 
areas of focus. Our external Auditor, Deloitte, also attended the 
majority of Committee meetings and receives all papers submitted 
to the Committee. Each meeting so attended includes an opportunity 
for the external Auditor to raise any matters in confidence which 
they consider should be brought to the attention of the Committee 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

without the Executive Directors being present. Similarly, the Group 
Head of Risk and Assurance has a regular opportunity to address the 
Committee without the Executive Directors being present.

Main activities of the Committee during the year

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES CONSIDERED IN RELATION TO THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Committee monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial 
information and other formal documents relating to its financial 
performance and makes appropriate recommendations to the Board 
before publication.

A key factor in the integrity of financial statements is ensuring 
that suitable and compliant accounting policies are adopted and 
applied consistently on a year-on-year basis and across the Group. 
In this respect, the Committee also considers significant estimates 
and judgements made by management in preparing the financial 
statements.

The Committee’s considerations are supported by input from other 
assurance providers, e.g. the Group’s actuarial advisers and the Group 
Head of Risk and Assurance, as well as our external Auditor.

Summarised in the table on page 60 are some of the significant 
issues the Committee considered during the year in relation to the 
financial statements. These are separated into items of particular 
focus this year and recurring items that the Committee regularly 
addresses. The table also sets out the key performance indicators 
impacted by each of these issues in the financial statements, their 
relevance to the financial statements and an assessment of the 
degree of judgement required in concluding on each item.

In addition to the items outlined in the table on page 60, following 
identification of the over-statement of certain assets and the 
under-statement of certain liabilities within the Gears business unit 
(outlined in the Finance Director’s Report on page 24), the Committee 
directed the independent investigation into the misstatements. This 
independent investigation was led by the Group’s internal audit 
function, with further support provided by PwC.

The Committee considered the implications of the misstatements on 
the Annual Report and Accounts and determined that the original 
Annual Report and Accounts no longer gave a true and fair view 
of the assets, liabilities and profit and loss of the Company and 
undertakings included in the consolidation as a whole. Following 
advice of professional advisers, it was determined that the Directors’ 
exercise their authority under s454 of Companies Act 2006 to revise 
the Annual Report and Accounts. These revised Annual Report and 
Accounts reflect the revision as outlined in Note 28.

As the misstatements also impact on the net assets and adjusted 
operating profit for the years ended 31 March 2017 and 2018, the 
Committee also gave consideration to the application of IAS 8 
‘Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors’. As 
the findings of the independent investigation in to the accounting 
issues in the Gears business unit concluded that the misstatements 
were intentional, the Committee concluded that the misstatements 
fall within the definition of prior period errors. Due to the 
materiality of the error, the Committee concluded that a prior period 
restatement was appropriate and the detail of this restatement is 
outlined Note 27. 

59

22/08/2019   17:28:40

Renold 2019-AR.indd   59

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

GOVERNANCE

Audit Committee  
Report

Review matters

Relevant KPIs

Relevance

Pension accounting and disclosure

Financing charges

Carrying value of intangible assets, 
deferred tax assets and investments in 
subsidiary undertakings

Net assets

Adjusted results

Net assets

 •
 •

 •
 •
 •
 •

 •

IAS 19R finance charge £2.4m (2018 : £2.4m)
Net pension liability £101.9m (2018: £97.4m)

Amortisation charge £0.9m (2018: £0.9m)
Net intangible assets £6.6m (2018: £8.3m)
Deferred tax assets £21.5m (2018: £20.6m)
Unrecognised deferred tax assets £20.8m 
(2018: £24.8m)
Investments in subsidiary undertakings 
(Company balance sheet) £163.5m 
(2018: £157.6m)

Judgement 
required

Moderate

High

Inventory valuations and provisioning

Inventory value

Restructuring costs

Average working capital 
ratio

Net assets

Adjusted results

RoS%

Pension accounting and disclosure
(RECURRING ANNUAL ITEM: SEE NOTE 18 TO THE  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

Defined benefit pension scheme accounting is a complex matter. 
The values disclosed can fluctuate materially, particularly in a 
period of significant changes in gilt yields and interest rates. The 
values disclosed are also sensitive to a range of assumptions where 
judgement is required. This is illustrated in the table below.

Change in liability
Assumption sensitivity
Impact of 0.5% increase in UK discount rates £14.7m decrease
Impact of 0.5% decrease in UK discount rates £16.5m increase
Impact of 0.5% increase in UK inflation rates £13.3m increase
Impact of 0.5% decrease in UK inflation rates £10.8m decrease
Impact of 1 year higher life expectancy in UK £9.8m increase

As has been the case for a number of years, the Committee reviews 
management estimates which are produced following independent 
actuarial advice and are compared to third-party benchmarks on 
the reasonableness of the assumptions used. We ensure the Group’s 
underlying assumptions and methodology used in deriving them are 
consistent year-on-year or are justified by experience of the scheme 
or by third-party metrics. In respect of the relatively high mortality 
assumption, the Committee considered scheme-specific data which 
underpins and supports the level of mortality assumed by the 
Group. The Committee was satisfied that the assumptions are within 
an acceptable range and no changes were made to management 
assumptions.

The Committee has also encouraged additional disclosure of financial 
information in respect of defined benefit pension schemes. Largely 
graphical in nature, this is designed to give greater clarity of the risks, 
issues and opportunities in what is a complex area of accounting: see 
pages 28 and 29 of the Finance Director’s Review.

Net inventory value £44.3m (2018: £40.8m)

 •
 • Working capital percentage of sales 23%  

Moderate

(2018: 22%) 

 •

 •

 •

Net liabilities £0.9m (2018: net liabilities £0.4m)

Adjusted operating profit impact £2.9m 
(2018: £4.7m)
RoS impact 1.4% (2018: 2.5%)

Moderate

The Committee considered again but continues to conclude that the 
financing charges and administration costs of the closed defined 
benefit pension schemes should, for the purposes of assessing 
underlying performance as reported in adjusted operating profit and 
adjusted EPS, be excluded from these calculations. The costs involved 
relate to closed legacy pension schemes that have no bearing or 
relevance to understanding the underlying performance of the 
ongoing business; see Note 18 to the financial statements.

While the level of judgement on assumptions used in arriving at the 
deficit numbers is judged to be low as these use known published 
data/indices, there is more judgement in the nature of the disclosure 
hence the overall judgement required is viewed as moderate.

Carrying value of intangible assets, deferred tax assets 
and investments in subsidiary undertakings 
(RECURRING ANNUAL ITEM: SEE NOTES 7, 8 AND 17 TO THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

The Group holds a number of valuable intangible assets, such as 
goodwill and computer software, in addition to deferred tax assets. 
The parent Company and other subsidiary holding companies also 
hold investments in various subsidiaries (which are relevant in their 
individual statutory accounts as opposed to the consolidated financial 
statements).

The judgements on the carrying value of these assets are normally 
a key area for Committee scrutiny as carrying values are based on 
discounted estimates of future profitability over a number of years 
and hence are highly sensitive to the assumptions used.

These are areas where management estimates play a key role in 
supporting the carrying values reported in the balance sheet. The 
Committee reviews the assumptions underlying the discounted cash 
flow. The details of the impairment reviews performed are in Note 
7. Short-term cash flows are confirmed by reference to the Board-
approved budget for the following year and sense checked against 
the longer-term Strategic Plan.

60

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   60

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:41

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

As part of the review of defined benefit pension accounting, the 
Committee also reviews the carrying value and recoverability of 
the related deferred tax assets. The Committee was satisfied that 
the extended duration of the pension liabilities in Germany and the 
UK, and their priority in recognition, justified the extended recovery 
periods for the associated deferred tax assets which were also fully 
supported by expectations of future taxable profitability.

Inventory valuations and provisioning 
(RECURRING ANNUAL ITEM: SEE NOTE 11 TO THE  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

As a manufacturer, the Group adds value to raw materials as part 
of its normal production processes. In order to provide shorter 
lead times and better customer service, the Group also holds a 
significant amount of stock. Inventory therefore represents a material 
component of the Group’s balance sheet. The basis of valuation 
includes the allocation of amounts for labour and overhead costs 
which require the exercise of management judgement. The overall 
process is governed by accepted accounting methodologies for 
the absorption of labour and overheads into stock. While these 
methodologies help to reduce risk, based on the scale of inventory 
holdings and the extensive product range, the overall level of 
judgement required is assessed as moderate.

The Committee reviews both the valuation bases and the application of 
the Group’s policy on providing for slow-moving and obsolete stock. The 
Committee reviews both the rules governing the automatic generation 
of provisions based on the age of stock and any management 
judgemental overrides. The Committee is satisfied that the net book 
value shown in Note 11 is appropriate and that any management 
judgements formed in arriving at those values are reasonable.

Viability Statement
(RECURRING ANNUAL ITEM: SEE PAGE 37)

In accordance with provision C2.2 of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code, the Board is required to assess the prospects of the Company 
over a period longer than 12 months from the approval of the 
financial statements.

In addition to assessing that the Going Concern basis remains 
appropriate for the financial statements, the Committee has helped 
the Board prepare the Viability Statement and the period over which 
it will apply. The Committee considered the STEP 2020 Strategic 
Plan and sensitivities against it in preparing the Viability Statement 
as well as the appropriateness of the three-year review period. The 
Company’s current position and principal risks were also reviewed in 
detail by the Committee prior to advising the Board.

The Company’s full Viability Statement can be found on page 37 of 
the Strategic Report.

Other recurring matters reviewed by the Committee:

 •
 •
 •
 •

Corporate risk reporting processes and action plans;

The annual process for control self-assurance and reporting;

Reviewing medium-term financial planning assumptions; and

The ongoing programme to improve the efficiency of financial 
control processes in the business.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   61

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

61

22/08/2019   17:28:43

GOVERNANCE

Audit Committee  
Report

Restructuring costs
(CURRENT YEAR FOCUS ITEM: SEE NOTE 2(C) TO THE  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)

The STEP 2020 Strategic Plan envisages and requires a number 
of years of restructuring activity within the Group. Each year the 
Committee focuses on and challenges management’s allocation of 
costs and credits between adjusting and ordinary items. We ensure 
that the adjusting items genuinely need to be excluded so as to 
allow users of the accounts to form an accurate assessment of the 
performance of the underlying business.

We concluded that the net charges were sufficiently material  
and not related to the underlying business so as to require  
separate disclosure.

Internal control, risk and compliance
We regularly evaluate the integrity of financial reporting and the 
robustness of internal controls to ensure compliance with applicable 
legal and internal requirements. We also review the Group’s policies 
and procedures for identifying material business risks and action 
plans aimed at reducing the likelihood of risks crystallising and 
mitigating the impact if they do.

The ERMMC receives regular reports from the Group Head of Risk 
and Assurance to convey the status of risk profiles and actions arising 
from the risk assessment process. The ERMMC reports the results of 
its meetings to the Committee. 

Further details of our internal control and risk management systems, 
including the financial reporting process, can be found on pages 30 to 
31 and 58. Our primary risk factors are shown in the Strategic Report 
on pages 32 to 36. Given the recent accounting issues identified in the 
Gears business unit, the Committee will be reviewing the robustness 
of the internal control environment, taking into account the findings of 
the independent investigation and recommendations from the Auditor, 
and ensuring improvements are implemented as a matter of urgency. 

Confidential reporting procedures and whistle-blowing
The stewardship of the Group’s assets and the integrity of the 
financial statements are further supported by confidential reporting 
and whistle-blowing procedures. The Committee reviews these 
procedures once a year to ensure that appropriate processes are in 
place to treat complaints confidentially and implement proportionate 
and independent investigation in all cases. The Committee is diligent 
in ensuring a high degree of visibility and accessibility of whistle-
blowing communications methods to all staff, including first-hand 
inspection during site visits.

The Committee considers the number and nature of reports received 
in the year to be small in number and scale of risk in comparison to 
businesses of a similar size and geographical distribution.

Internal audit
The Committee receives and considers reports on the control 
environment from the Group Head of Risk and Assurance. These 
reports highlight key improvement themes and recommend areas for 
business focus, with additional observations provided around root 
cause analysis and cultural and behavioural themes. 

In addition, the Committee has visibility of management responses 
and action tracking via the Group’s Integrated Risk Management 
System at each meeting. The annual internal audit plan, which 
contains mandatory, risk-based and cyclical review, has been built 

around focus areas such as organisational change, major projects, IT 
security, business resilience and capital spend.

In the new financial year, the annual internal audit plan will include 
site financial control audits, site health and safety audits and  
project assurance. The approach to internal audits will be 
reconsidered in light of the control weaknesses identified as part of 
the independent investigation into the accounting issues in the Gears 
business unit.

The Committee also undertakes an annual review of the effectiveness 
of the internal audit function, the results of which are factored into 
internal audit planning for the subsequent year.

External audit
The Committee is responsible for overseeing relations with the 
external Auditor, including the approval of their terms of engagement, 
and makes recommendations to the Board on their remuneration and 
appointment and, where appropriate, reappointment based upon 
reviews of audit effectiveness. 

Details of total remuneration for the external Auditor for the year, 
including audit services, audit-related services and other  
non-audit services, can be found in Note 2(b) to the consolidated 
financial statements.

Auditor independence and objectivity
The independence of the external Auditor is essential to the provision 
of an objective opinion on the true and fair view presented in 
the financial statements. Auditor independence and objectivity is 
safeguarded by limiting the nature and value of non-audit services 
performed by the external Auditor. The Group has a policy of not 
recruiting senior employees of the external Auditor, who have worked 
on the audit in the past two years, to senior financial positions within 
the Group, and the rotation of the lead engagement partner at least 
every five years. The current lead engagement partner was appointed 
during the audit tender process in 2015 and this is therefore the 
fourth year end he has been in post.

Non-audit services provided by the external Auditor
The Committee is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate 
relationship is maintained between the Group and the external 
Auditor. Non-audit services can only be provided by the external 
Auditor if there is no potential conflict of interest or material risk of 
values being included in the financial statements that have been both 
advised on and audited by the external Auditor.

To safeguard the independence and objectivity of the external 
Auditor, the Committee has approved a policy on non-audit services 
provided by the external Auditor in line with professional practice and 
in accordance with ethical standards published by the Audit Practices 
Board of the Financial Reporting Council. Control of non-audit 
services is exercised by ensuring that all non-audit services where 
fees exceed an agreed limit are subject to the prior approval of the 
Committee. The policy is available on the Company’s website,  
www.renold.com.

During the year ended 31 March 2019, the Committee continued with 
the appointment of other accountancy firms to provide non-audit 
services to the Group and anticipates that this will continue during 
the year ending 31 March 2020.

Total non-audit services provided by Deloitte during the year ended 
31 March 2019 were £0.1m (2018: £nil) and related to work in support 

62

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   62

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:43

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

of moving the Company’s listing to AIM. Total audit and audit-related 
fees include the statutory audit fee and fees paid to Deloitte for 
other services which the external Auditor is required to perform. 
Examples might include reporting to banking partners in territories 
where no statutory accounts are required to be prepared. Non-audit 
fees represent all other services provided by Deloitte not included in 
the above. There were no significant non-audit services provided by 
Deloitte in the year.

The Committee also discussed the overall level of fees and considered 
them appropriate given the current size of the Group. The Committee 
is satisfied that the level and scope of non-audit services undertaken 
by the external Auditor does not impair its independence or objectivity 
and considers that the Company receives particular benefit from the 
advice provided by its external Auditor, given its wide and detailed 
knowledge of the Group and its international operations.

Audit focus
To ensure appropriate focus on key risk areas identified by the 
Committee, the proposed external audit plan is challenged before 
the audit commences to ensure that Deloitte has developed 
appropriately targeted audit procedures. These are closely aligned 
with the current year focus items noted above in the section entitled 
‘Main activities of the Committee during the year.’ They also reflect 
the relative changes in profitability and materiality of each of the 
Group’s operating units during the year (in some cases as a result of 
the ongoing restructuring activities).

The audit committee has also overseen and appropriately challenged 
Deloitte in their audit of the revised financial statements following 
the internal control issues identified within the Gears business unit.

Assessment of effectiveness of external audit 
The Committee has a formal system for evaluating the performance 
and independence of the external Auditor. This system involves active 
dialogue with the lead engagement partner, a formal questionnaire 
and feedback process involving senior management in direct contact 
with the audit team, and Deloitte’s response to accounting, financial 
control and audit issues as these arise.

The Committee conducts an annual review of the structure and 
approach taken in the external audit, the level of non-audit fees, 
and the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external 
Auditor. This includes consideration of:

 •
 •
 •
 •

The global external audit process;

The Auditor’s performance;

The expertise of the firm and our relationship with them; and

The results of the questionnaire process noted above.

The results of the review are discussed with the external Auditor.

The Deloitte lead partner is due to rotate at the conclusion of the 
31 March 2020 audit. We are working with Deloitte to expedite the 
identification of the successor partner to enable effective shadowing 
during the 2020 audit, including, importantly, assessing the 
implementation of improvements to the Group’s control environment 
following the issues identified in the Gears business unit.

Following this year’s annual review, the Committee was satisfied 
with the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external 
Auditor. As noted below, the Committee has made a recommendation 
to the Board to reappoint Deloitte as the Group’s external Auditor 
and a resolution to that effect will be included in the ordinary 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

business of the AGM to be held on 17 July 2019. There are no 
contractual obligations restricting the choice of external Auditor nor 
has the Company entered into any Auditor liability agreements.

Audit information
Having made the requisite enquiries, so far as the Directors in office 
at the date of the approval of this report are aware, there is no 
relevant audit information of which the Auditor is unaware and each 
Director has taken all reasonable steps to make themselves aware 
of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Auditor is 
aware of that information.

Fair, balanced and understandable: the role of the 
Disclosure Committee
As part of the process of ensuring that all disclosures made by 
the Company are timely, accurate and importantly meet the ‘fair, 
balanced and understandable’ requirement arising under the UK 
Corporate Governance Code, the Group maintains a Disclosure 
Committee whose membership includes the Chairman of the Audit 
Committee (as Chair), the Group Finance Director, the Group Financial 
Controller and the Company Secretary.

The consideration of the fair, balanced and understandable 
requirement is detailed on page 56. In summary, the Disclosure 
Committee carried out the following activities.

 •

 •

 •

All those contributing to the Annual Report and Accounts were 
briefed on the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code with specific emphasis on the fair, balanced and 
understandable requirement.

A number of senior managers who were knowledgeable about 
the business, but otherwise not significantly involved in the 
preparation of the Annual Report and Accounts, each performed 
an independent review of the draft Annual Report and Accounts. 
The feedback and comments received as a result were reviewed 
and amendments made accordingly.

As in previous years, a documented verification file of all 
substantive facts and assertions is maintained and reviewed for 
completeness prior to finalisation of the Annual Report  
and Accounts.

The Disclosure Committee presents its findings and 
recommendations to the Audit Committee as part of its review of 
processes to enable the fair, balanced and understandable statement 
to be made.

Committee evaluation
The Committee’s effectiveness is assessed annually and on the 
basis of a programme of continuous improvement. Lessons from 
the assessment are used to try to improve the process, but the 
Committee has concluded that it acted within its terms of reference 
and carried out its responsibilities effectively.

We welcome feedback from shareholders on this report and I will be 
available at the AGM to answer questions.

DAVID LANDLESS
CHAIRMAN OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

63

22/08/2019   17:28:43

Renold 2019-AR.indd   63

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

GOVERNANCE

Nomination Committee  
Report

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN OF 
THE NOMINATION 
COMMITTEE

We continue to focus on planning for 
succession and appointed Tim Cooper 
as a Non-Executive Director during 
the year to enable a smooth transition 
when Ian Griffiths steps down as the 
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
in 2020. We are confident that our 
current Board is balanced and has a 
range of relevant skills, knowledge 
and experience. We are committed to 
maintaining and building on this broad 
base of skills, and continue to focus on 
enhancing our succession planning.

Key objectives
In support of the Board’s duty of good stewardship, the Committee 
aims to ensure that appropriate corporate governance is applied to 
considering the structure, size and composition of the Board and 
the Board’s Committees. Succession planning is at the top of the 
Committee’s agenda, with processes in place to ensure the Board has 
a broad and relevant skill set. The Board is mindful of and supports 
the move for greater diversity. However, as the search for a new Non-
Executive Director has demonstrated, finding high-quality, available 
candidates who add value to our businesses and increase the diversity 
of the Board has proved challenging.

Governance
The Committee’s terms of reference were reviewed during the year 
and have been updated to reflect the proposed re-listing on AIM.  
The terms of reference are available on the Company’s website,  
www.renold.com.

Responsibilities
The Committee has delegated authority from the Board, in accordance 
with the 2016 UK Corporate Governance Code. The Committee’s 
responsibilities include:

 •

Reviewing the structure, size and composition of the Board. This 
includes assessing skills, knowledge, experience and diversity of 
Board members and any resulting recommendations for change;

 • Where new appointments of Executive and/or Non-Executive 
Directors are to be made, to lead that process and identify and 
nominate candidates to the Board; and

 •

Giving full consideration to succession planning for Directors and 
other senior executives, taking account of the challenges and 
opportunities facing the Company.

Composition of the Nomination Committee
Our three Non-Executive Directors are all members of the Committee, 
which I chair. This year has seen the retirement of John Allkins at the 
2018 AGM in July and the appointment of Tim Cooper, who joined us 
as a Non-Executive Director in November of 2018. The Committee 
meets during the year as required.

Nomination Committee members and meetings attended

Names
Mark Harper
John Allkins

Ian Griffiths
David Landless
Tim Cooper

Position
Chairman
Non-Executive Director 
(resigned July 2018)
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director 
(appointed November 2018)

Meetings 
attended
3 of 3
1 of 3

3 of 3
3 of 3
1 of 3

64

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   64

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:43

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Policy on appointments to the Board and diversity
In accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code, when reviewing the Board’s structure, the Committee’s primary 
objective is to ensure that the Executive and Non-Executive Directors 
have the relevant skills, knowledge and experience to create a 
balanced and effective Board and to support the Group in delivering 
its overall strategic objectives. This is in parallel with ensuring that the 
costs and composition of the Board reflect the size of business and its 
current stage of development. Our policy extends to ensuring that the 
various sub-committees of the Board also have an appropriate range 
of skills and experience to deliver their terms of reference.

In addition to skills and experience, we will also consider factors 
such as how an individual’s personal attributes would complement 
and enhance the diversity on the Board. For the appointment of 
Non-Executive Directors, additional factors for consideration include 
independence and time commitment.

The Board is aware of the need to consider the benefits of diversity 
on the Board in all its aspects. The Board continues to believe that it is 
not appropriate to set measurable objectives for the implementation 
of the diversity policy at this time. In any future changes to its 
composition, the Board will continue to be mindful of the issues 
of diversity, including gender, and these factors will be taken into 
account alongside the overriding objective of appointing the best 
possible candidate for the role.

In selecting candidates for the shortlist for any appointment, the 
Board always considers candidates from a wide range of backgrounds 
and on merit and against objective criteria. 

A formal and rigorous process is followed during the recruitment 
process for a new Director. The process for making appointments 
commences with the evaluation process described above. The 
Committee will then seek to identify suitable candidates, usually with 
the use of external recruitment consultants or, where appropriate, 
the use of open advertising. The Board supports the engagement of 
executive search firms who have signed up to the Voluntary Code of 
Conduct on gender diversity and best practice and who do not have 
any other connection with the Company.

Appointment of a Non-Executive Director
The recruitment process for the appointment of Tim Cooper 
commenced with the Senior Independent Director and myself 
initiating an executive recruitment search in June 2018, engaging 
Odgers Berndtson to assist with the process. The brief was to identify 
potential candidates who have manufacturing experience with a 
view to making a diverse appointment if the candidate also has the 
requisite experience. Early on in the process it was made clear that 
there was a very small pool of candidates who would satisfy the 
diversity criteria and that the scale of Renold’s operations would not 
have appeal to such candidates.

A longlist of candidates was prepared in conjunction with Odgers 
Berndtson. Those candidates were then interviewed by myself 
and the Senior Independent Director, with a shortlist of candidates 
subsequently interviewed by other Directors.

In the meeting held on November 2018, the Nominations Committee 
recommended the appointment of Tim Cooper as a Non-Executive 
Director of the Company. The Board (who duly considered him to 
be independent on appointment by reference to the UK Corporate 
Governance Code), appointed Tim Cooper as a Non-Executive Director 
on 14 November 2018.

Board composition
During the current reporting period, we experienced a period of 
change for the Board. While we maintained a Board of six members, 
with two Executive Directors and four Non-Executive Directors, 2018 
saw the retirement of John Allkins as a Non-Executive Director and 
the appointment of Tim Cooper as a Non-Executive Director.

The Committee considers that the current capability of the Board has 
been appropriate in the current reporting period. This view reflects 
the need to deliver excellent corporate governance while balancing the 
need for cost control as we continue to progress the Group’s strategy.

Other than in relation to gender and ethnicity, the current Board is 
diverse in terms of the different skill sets of each member. These 
include professional qualifications and career work experience but 
also wider experience relevant to our global business with most of 
the Board members having worked and lived overseas for significant 
periods. For further information, see the chart on page 50.

Succession planning and responsibilities of Directors
As previously reported, as part of a programme of orderly succession, 
John Allkins retired from the Board at the 2018 AGM and Tim Cooper 
was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in November 2018.

It is intended that Tim will, when he has sufficient experience, 
succeed Ian Griffiths as the Chairman of the Remuneration 
Committee. To enable an orderly handover of responsibilities and to 
allow Tim to gain sufficient experience, Ian Griffiths has agreed to 
continue in his role as Senior Independent Director and Chairman of 
the Remuneration Committee until the 2020 AGM.

Other succession planning
I reported last year that the Board is mindful of its obligations under 
the UK Corporate Governance Code in relation to succession planning, 
and a detailed review of succession planning for the Board and 
senior management took place. The review, as it related to senior 
management, concluded that the continued strengthening of the 
management team, led by the Chief Executive, is ongoing and will 
continue to be an area of focus for the Committee.

Effectiveness review
During the year, the Committee has also carried out its annual 
evaluation. Again, this has proved a useful exercise in reviewing the 
Committee’s work and concluded that it continues to work effectively.

MARK HARPER
CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION COMMITTEE

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   65

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

65

22/08/2019   17:28:43

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Annual Statement

IAN GRIFFITHS
CHAIRMAN OF THE 
REMUNERATION 
COMMITTEE

This year, the Remuneration Policy 
has been reviewed and will be put 
before shareholders for approval. 
The Committee believes that this 
policy continues to align executive 
remuneration arrangements with 
the interests of our shareholders 
while supporting the delivery of the 
Company’s Strategic Objectives.

Structure of our Directors’ Remuneration Report
This report is on the activities of the Remuneration Committee for 
the period to 31 March 2019. It sets out the Remuneration Policy and 
remuneration details for the Executive and Non-Executive Directors 
of the Company. It has been prepared in accordance with Schedule 8 
of The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2008 as amended in August 2013.

Our report is structured in the following sections after this  
Annual Statement: 

 •

 •

 •

 •

The Committee and its Activities, which sets out the 
responsibilities and work undertaken by the Remuneration 
Committee. 

The at a Glance section, which gives an easily accessible overview 
of this year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which sets out the proposal 
for the Company’s policy on Directors’ remuneration which is 
intended to apply for three years from the 2019 AGM, if approved 
by shareholders. 

The Annual Report on Remuneration, which shows the 
implementation of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy during the 
year ended 31 March 2019 and how it is proposed to be applied 
for the year ending 31 March 2019.

The existing Directors’ Remuneration Policy was approved at the 
2016 Annual General Meeting on 20 July 2016 and took effect from 
this date. The Annual Report on Remuneration provides details on 
remuneration in the period and other information required by the 
Regulations. It will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the 
2019 Annual General Meeting.

The Directors’ Remuneration Policy has been reviewed and updated 
and will be the subject of a binding shareholder vote at the 2019 AGM.

The Companies Act 2006 requires the Auditor to report to the 
shareholders on certain parts of the Directors’ Remuneration Report 
and to state whether, in their opinion, those parts of the report have 
been properly prepared in accordance with the Regulations. The parts 
of the Annual Report on Remuneration that are subject to audit are 
indicated in that report. This Annual Statement, the At a Glance section 
and the Directors’ Remuneration Policy are not subject to audit.

In this Annual Statement I summarise the main outcomes in the 
year for the remuneration of the Executive Directors and also the 
continued application of the Remuneration Policy.

Key remuneration outcomes for the year
In line with the Group’s Strategic Objective to deliver improved 
operating profit margins, the Chief Executive’s salary has remained 
unchanged since 2013. The Group Finance Director’s salary has 
remained unchanged in the year to 31 March 2019.

66

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   66

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:45

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The key outcomes under the elements of variable pay for the year are:

 •

 •

 •

Annual bonus: The Company delivered improved EBITDA in the 
year, but average net debt increased reflecting investment in the 
new Chinese factory in the year.

The Committee assessed performance against adjusted EBITDA 
and net debt targets (both based on constant budgeted exchange 
rates) set at the beginning of the year, as follows. The adjusted 
EBITDA for the year ended 31 March 2019 of £23.4m was within 
the target range of £21.75m to £24.75m. Average net debt 
during the year was £34.2m and was above the bonus matrix 
target threshold of £33.85m. However, the Committee exercised 
discretion to adjust the average net debt for certain inventory 
increases necessary to support the successful move of the 
Chinese factory, but limited the impact of this discretion to 20% 
of the maximum bonus payable. As a result of the accounting 
issues identified in the Gears business unit subsequent to 
determining this bonus award, the Committee has agreed a 
clawback of 25% of the bonus paid to Executive Directors.

The performance period for the PSP awards granted in June 2016 
ended on 31 March 2019. The performance conditions required 
growth of 10% per year in adjusted EPS for threshold vesting. EPS 
decreased over the testing period from 4.7p for the period ended 
31 March 2016 to 4.5p for the period ended 31 March 2019, and 
therefore the awards will not vest.

Remuneration Policy
The Directors’ Remuneration Policy was amended and approved by 
over 90% votes in favour at the 2016 AGM and it is intended that it 
will continue to apply until its expiry in July 2019. The Committee 
has undertaken a full review of remuneration and established best 
practice and is proposing a replacement Remuneration Policy which 
is subject to shareholder approval at the 2019 AGM. This proposed 
replacement Remuneration Policy is outlined on pages 71 to 76.

Following shareholder approval for the move to AIM at the General 
Meeting on 8 May 2019, it is anticipated that the admission to AIM will 
be fully completed ahead of the AGM in July 2019. Admission to AIM 
will result in the Group adopting the governance regime of the Quoted 
Companies Alliance, and under this code, the Company is not required 
to put the proposed replacement policy to shareholders for approval. 
However, with the Directors’ intention to operate the Company’s 
reporting and governance structure in substantially the same manner 

as previously applied, I confirm that the Board will be seeking the 
approval of shareholders to the replacement Remuneration Policy 
at the 2019 AGM.

The Committee believes that the replacement Remuneration Policy 
aligns executive remuneration arrangements with the interests of 
our shareholders while supporting the delivery of the Company’s 
Strategic Objectives.

Good progress has been made under the Strategic Plan, but there 
remains much to do to fully deliver upon the Strategic Objectives 
of the Group. However, the Committee firmly believes that the 
proposed Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) appropriately incentivises 
the Executive Directors and supports the delivery of the Strategic 
Objectives. In addition, the shareholding requirements for Executive 
Directors will continue to align management’s interests with those of 
shareholders.

The Committee believes that the structure and implementation of total 
remuneration for the Executive Directors is market competitive with 
companies of a similar size, and consistent with maintaining support 
for the Company’s cash position. Under the replacement Remuneration 
Policy, LTIP awards will be solely based on EPS targets aligning to the 
Group’s objective of delivering improving operating margins.

The Committee continues to focus on clear reporting of past 
remuneration and future policy. We are aware that the landscape 
for executive pay is changing. We will respond to changes and best 
practice as they develop in so far as they are appropriate to the 
Company’s governance regime.

As required by AIM, the Company must elect to adopt an appropriate 
corporate governance regime and has elected to adopt the Quoted 
Companies Alliance Code of Governance with effect from the date of 
admission of its shares to AIM. The Committee will continue to focus 
on clear and transparent reporting of past remuneration and future 
policy at levels consistent with this report.

We welcome feedback from shareholders and I will be available at 
the AGM to answer any questions.

IAN GRIFFITHS
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   67

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

67

22/08/2019   17:28:46

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
The Committee and its Activities

This section of our report describes the membership of the 
Committee, its key responsibilities and principal activities during the 
year. It forms part of the Annual Report on Remuneration section of 
the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Remuneration Committee composition and  
meetings attended
The members of the Committee are the Non-Executive Directors, all 
of whom are considered by the Board to be independent. Members 
of the Committee during the year are set out below and further 
biographical details can be found on pages 48 and 49.

The Committee’s terms of reference require meetings to be held at 
least twice a year. This year, the Committee met on six occasions.

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS  
AND MEETINGS ATTENDED

Names
Ian Griffiths
John Allkins 

Position
Chairman
Non-Executive Director  
(resigned July 2018)

David Landless Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director 
Tim Cooper
(appointed November 2018)

Meetings 
attended
6 of 6
3 of 6

6 of 6
2 of 6

The Executive Directors, the Chairman of the Board and the Group 
HR Director attend meetings by invitation. PwC, the external advisers 
to the Committee, also attend meetings by invitation. Further 
details in relation to PwC’s engagement as adviser to the Committee 
can be found below. No Director is involved in deciding his own 
remuneration, whether determined by the Committee or, in the case 
of the Non-Executive Directors, by the Board.

Governance
The terms of reference of the Committee were reviewed during the 
year and have been updated to reflect the proposed re-listing on AIM. 
The terms of reference are available on the Company’s website, www.
renold.com. None of the Committee members have any personal 
financial interest (other than as shareholders) in the matters to be 
decided or any conflict of interest, cross-directorships or day-to-day 
involvement in the running of the business.

An evaluation of the Committee was undertaken during the year 
ended 31 March 2019 and this review concluded the Committee has 
operated effectively.

The Company’s Auditor is required to report on certain parts of the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report and to state whether in its opinion 
those parts of the report have been properly prepared in accordance 
with the relevant accounting regulations. Audited sections of the 
report are indicated accordingly.

Key responsibilities of the Committee
The Committee has delegated authority from the Board. In 
accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Committee’s 
responsibilities include:

 •

 •

Determination on behalf of the Board, and within agreed terms 
of reference set by the Board, the overall remuneration packages 
for the Executive Directors and the Chairman, and the terms 
of the service contracts and all other terms and conditions of 
employment of the Executive Directors.

Ensuring that executive pay is strongly aligned to the Company’s 
business priorities and the interests of shareholders. The 
Remuneration Policy is designed to attract, motivate and retain 
individuals who will deliver strong performance for all of our 
stakeholders. The Committee takes into account the pay and 
employment conditions of employees within the Group when 
determining the Executive Directors’ remuneration.

Adviser to the Committee 
During the year, the Committee received independent advice 
from PwC in relation to remuneration reporting, operation of the 
Company’s share plans, advice on long-term incentive performance 
measurement and information on market trends in executive 
remuneration. Total fees for services provided over the year 
amounted to £38,700. 

PwC was appointed by the Committee in 2014 following an 
assessment and interview process and has advised on various 
issues including Remuneration Policy, the regulations governing 
reporting on remuneration and updating the Committee on trends 
in compensation matters. Fees charged have been on a time-spent 
basis. PwC is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group 
and adheres to that group’s Code of Conduct. PwC has provided 
internal audit, tax and pensions-related services to the Company. The 
Committee has chosen to retain PwC as its adviser. 

The Committee is satisfied that the advice given on executive 
remuneration is objective and independent and that no conflict of 
interest arises as a result of these services. 

In addition to external advice received from PwC, the Committee 
consulted and received reports from the Group Finance Director 
and the Group HR Director. At all times, the Committee recognises 
the need to identify and manage conflicts of interest when receiving 
reports from, or consulting with, the Executive Directors or members 
of senior management.

68

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   68

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:46

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Main activities of the Committee during the year
This year, the Committee discussed the following themes and agenda items in accordance with its terms of reference:

Theme

Best practice 

Annual Report on 
Remuneration

Agenda items

Considering the current UK corporate governance environment and the implications for the Company

Considering and approving the Annual Report on Remuneration to be put to shareholders

Executive Directors

Reviewing the base salaries payable to each of the Executive Directors

Reviewing performance under the annual bonus scheme and consideration of any bonuses payable for the 
financial year ended 31 March 2019

Approving the annual bonus structure, quantum and performance targets for the financial year ending 31 March 
2020

Approving the awards made under the Company’s Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’) during the year

Chairman

Reviewing the fee payable to the Chairman

Committee performance

Reviewing the Committee’s performance

Performance of external 
advisers

Policy

Reviewing the performance of PwC and considering whether to retain them as external remuneration consultants

Reviewing and determining administrative amendments to the Company’s PSP scheme rules
Developing and proposing a replacement Remuneration Policy for approval of shareholders at the 2019 AGM

Terms of reference

Reviewing the Committee’s terms of reference to ensure that such terms are consistent with and in compliance 
with the Company’s corporate governance regime

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   69

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

69

22/08/2019   17:28:46

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
At a Glance

Our remuneration principles and elements of remuneration 

Principle

Elements

Purpose

Base salary 

Attract, retain and motivate Executive Directors to deliver 
high performance
Fixed pay 
 •
 •
 •
 •

Other benefits
Provide appropriate level of minimum pay 
commensurate with role

Pension

Align Executive Director pay to Company strategy and 
performance
Short-term variable
 •
Long-term variable
 •

Annual bonus

PSP

 •
 •

Drive annual Company performance

Align to earnings generation and shareholder value

How we have performed this year

Element

Bonus*

PSP

Measure
Adjusted EBITDA
Average net debt
Growth in adjusted EPS

Threshold target
£21.75m
£33.85m
10% p.a. growth

Maximum target
£24.75m
£32.35m
15% p.a. growth

Actual
£23.38m
£34.17m
1.4% p.a. decline

* 

The ‘actual’ amounts disclosed are calculated using constant budgeted exchange rates in accordance with the rule of the Scheme.

Single total figure of remuneration for Executive Directors

Executive Directors
Robert Purcell
Ian Scapens

Salary
 (£’000)
300
200

Benefits 
(£’000)
29
13

Bonus 1
(£’000)
60
40

LTIP 
(£’000)
–
–

Pensions 
(£’000)
45
30

Total 2019
(£’000)

434
283

Total 2018 
(£’000)
364
237

1 

Before clawback of 25% outlined on page 78.

70

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   70

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:48

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Introduction
This section of the Directors’ Remuneration Report (from pages 
71 to 76) sets out the Company’s proposed Remuneration Policy for 
the remuneration of its Directors, and which is subject to approval 
of the shareholders at the 2019 AGM. The proposed Remuneration 
Policy is based upon the same fundamental principles as the 2016 
Remuneration Policy.

The application of the current policy for the year ended 31 March 
2019 is set out in the Annual Report on Remuneration on pages 
77 to 82.

Policy review/timing
This Policy Report describes the principles and policy that will be 
used to set and manage the Directors’ remuneration with effect from 
17 July 2019, subject to shareholder approval at the AGM on that 
date. It is intended this Policy will apply over the next three years.   

Remuneration principles for Executive Directors

To attract, motivate and retain executives who will deliver high 
performance for all our stakeholders.

We believe the mix of our remuneration package provides an 
appropriate and balanced set of rewards. Executive reward at 
Renold is relatively modest compared to our peer group and this 
has been validated by independent third parties. This is consistent 
with the key Strategic Objective of lowering our breakeven point 
– this applies to executive pay as much as it does to any business 
expenditure. However, we are careful to ensure appropriate incentive 
opportunities remain for sustainable improvements in business 
performance.

To ensure a close alignment of executive pay to the Company’s 
Strategic Objectives and performance.

We review our incentive plans each year to ensure they remain 
closely aligned with the Company’s Strategic Objectives and our 
shareholders’ interests, while continuing to motivate and engage the 
team leading the Company to achieve stretching targets. 

Our Directors’ Remuneration Policy has been designed to deliver two 
key aims, which remain unchanged since the previous policy was 
approved by shareholders at the 2016 AGM:

In addition, we aim to make the remuneration framework for 
Executive Directors relatively simple – the incentive plans are 
therefore limited to an annual bonus and the PSP.

Policy table
Based on our view of current market practice, and the principles of our Remuneration Policy, we have established the Remuneration Policy set 
out in this report. The following table summarises the fixed and variable elements of remuneration for the Executive Directors.

Remuneration 
element

Purpose and link 
to corporate strategy

Operation of the element

Maximum potential value 
and payment at threshold/ 
review basis

Performance metrics

Base salary

Competitive salaries to attract, 
retain and motivate those 
responsible for executing 
strategy while ensuring the 
Company pays no more than is 
necessary.

Paid in 12 equal monthly 
instalments during the year. 

Reviewed annually and typically 
set on 1 August each year.

None.

The policy is to provide lower 
quartile salary for comparable 
jobs in manufacturing 
companies of a similar size, 
influenced by:

 •

 •

 •

Role, experience and 
performance;

Changes in broader 
workforce salary; and

Salaries payable in similar 
companies.

Annual rate for each Executive 
Director is set out in the Annual 
Report on Remuneration.

Salary increases for Executive 
Directors will be set with 
reference and regard to the 
rate of pay increase for UK 
workforce. Higher increases 
may be awarded if an individual 
falls behind market competitive 
levels or following recruitment 
into a role at a below-market 
rate until the individual is 
aligned with market levels 
or due to a change in role or 
responsibilities. Such increases 
will be explained in the 
Remuneration Report.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   71

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

71

22/08/2019   17:28:49

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Remuneration 
element

Purpose and link 
to corporate strategy

Benefits

As base salary above. 

Benefits are non-pensionable.

Pension

As base salary above.

Maximum potential value 
and payment at threshold/ 
review basis

Performance metrics

Car benefit is reviewed annually 
and set on 1 August each year 
in line with the Company’s car 
policy.

None.

The maximum opportunity for 
other benefits is defined by 
the nature of the benefit itself 
and the cost of providing it. 
As the cost of providing such 
benefits varies according to 
premium rates and the cost of 
other benefits is dependent on 
market rates and other factors, 
there is no formal maximum 
monetary value.

Cash allowances or pension 
contribution of up to 15% of 
base salary.

None.

Operation of the element

Paid monthly or as required for 
one-off events, consisting of: 

 •

 •

 •

Fully expensed 
company car (or cash 
equivalent)

Private medical 
insurance

Lump sum death-in-
service benefit of five 
times base salary.

Reasonable relocation expenses 
will be provided in line with 
market practice.

The Committee may change 
the benefits offered in line 
with local market practice or 
business needs.

The Company makes pension 
provision in the form of 
membership of the Company’s 
pension scheme, annual 
contributions to personal 
pension arrangements or cash 
supplements in lieu of pension.

Annual bonus

To incentivise delivery of 
the corporate strategy and 
reward delivery of superior 
performance.

Annual bonuses are paid 
shortly after the end of the 
financial year end to which they 
relate.

Bonuses are not pensionable.

Bonuses are normally payable 
in cash but the Committee has 
flexibility to introduce a share-
based deferral if it deems it 
appropriate.

Maximum bonus payments are 
made only on the achievement 
of outstanding performance.

Performance targets are set at 
the start of the financial year 
and the level of bonus paid is 
determined by the Committee 
after the year end based on 
performance against target.

Part or all of the cash bonus 
may be forfeited or clawed 
back should exceptional 
circumstances occur. Such 
circumstances include but 
are not limited to: fraud, 
misconduct, significant 
misstatement of financial 
results or incorrect calculation 
of performance conditions.

Maximum annual bonus 
payable is 100% of base salary.

No bonuses will be payable 
unless a minimum level of 
financial performance has been 
achieved. 

Threshold performance results 
in nil bonus being awarded and 
on-target performance results 
in 50% of the maximum bonus 
being awarded.

The bonus may be based on a 
range of financial, non-financial 
and personal targets as set 
by the Committee from year 
to year. Financial targets will 
comprise at least half of the 
bonus.

Details of the targets set will 
be set out in the Annual Report 
on Remuneration following the 
end of each financial year.

The Committee has the right 
to exercise its discretion fairly 
and reasonably in assessing 
the bonus outcome, including 
making adjustments for 
exceptional events occurring 
during the year.

The Committee has the 
discretion to vary the 
performance metrics over the 
life of this policy.

72

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   72

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:49

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Remuneration 
element

Purpose and link 
to corporate strategy

PSP

To incentivise delivery of long-
term shareholder value.

Shareholding 
requirement

To strengthen the alignment 
between the interests of 
Executive Directors and those 
of shareholders.

Maximum potential value 
and payment at threshold/ 
review basis

Chief Executive – up to 200% of 
base salary each year.

Group Finance Director – up to 
100% of base salary each year.

Vesting is dependent on 
performance conditions. On 
achievement of threshold 
performance no more than 25% 
of the award vests.

Performance metrics

The performance conditions can 
include one or more financial, 
non-financial and strategic 
measures, as determined by the 
Committee from year to year.

In exceptional circumstances, 
the Committee has discretion 
to change the performance 
measures, targets and 
weightings between measures 
during the performance period 
if there is a significant event 
which causes the Committee 
to believe that the original 
conditions are no longer 
appropriate. Any amendments 
would be such that the new 
conditions are not materially 
less difficult to satisfy than the 
original conditions.

The Committee also has 
discretion to reduce the 
percentage that vests in cases 
where it believes the outcome 
of the performance conditions 
is not a fair reflection of the 
Company’s performance.

Chief Executive – 200% of base 
salary.

None.

Other Executive Directors – 
100% of base salary.

Operation of the element

Key features of the PSP are:

 •

 •

 •

 •

Conditional share 
awards or nil-cost 
options.

Outstanding 
commitments to issue 
new shares under all 
share plans operated 
by the Company 
are subject to a 
maximum of 10% of the 
Company’s issued share 
capital in any ten-year 
period.

The PSP includes the 
ability to grant options 
under an HM Revenue 
& Customs approved 
schedule.

Part or the whole of 
the PSP award can 
be recovered prior 
to vesting if any of 
the circumstances 
should exceptional 
circumstances occur. 
Such circumstances 
include: fraud, 
misconduct, significant 
misstatement of 
financial results or 
incorrect calculation 
of performance 
conditions.

Executive Directors have five 
years to build the minimum 
holding.

Unvested PSP or deferred 
shares are not taken into 
account. Share price is 
measured at the end of each 
financial year.

Executive Directors are 
expected to retain all vested 
share awards, except those 
sufficient to satisfy income 
tax and National Insurance 
contributions, to the extent that 
the shareholding requirement 
is not met. Share-based 
incentives will be used as the 
only compulsory method to 
build up shareholdings.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   73

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

73

22/08/2019   17:28:49

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Shareholder views
The Committee welcomes the views of shareholders in respect of pay 
policy as well as those views expressed on behalf of shareholders 
by their respective proxy advisers. The Committee documents all 
remuneration-related comments made at the Company’s AGM and 
feedback received during consultation with shareholders throughout 
the year. Any feedback received is fully considered by the Committee 
and amendments may be made to remuneration policy where 
thought necessary.

Discretion of the Committee
The Committee has discretion in various areas of policy as set out 
in this report. The Committee may also exercise operational and 
administrative discretions under relevant plan rules approved by 
shareholders as set out in those rules. In addition, the Committee  
has the discretion to amend the implementation of policy with 
regard to minor or administrative matters where it would be, in 
the opinion of the Committee, disproportionate to seek or await 
shareholder approval.

Differences in remuneration policy for all employees
All employees of the Group are entitled to base salary and benefits in 
line with local country statutory requirements. The Group operates a 
number of pension plans for employees which it operates in line with 
local market practice. Some employees in senior roles are entitled to 
participate in an annual bonus scheme. The maximum opportunity 
available is based on the seniority and responsibility of the role.

Conditional share awards or nil-cost options are only available to 
nominated senior executives and Executive Directors. 

Statement of consideration of employment conditions 
elsewhere in the Group
The Committee has access, upon request, to details of remuneration 
terms for the employee population across the Group. Significant 
changes to existing remuneration practice in the Group would  
be brought to the attention of the Committee through the Group  
HR Director. 

The Group HR Director consults with the Committee on the 
performance metrics for Executive Directors’ bonuses, and the 
Committee approves these. 

The Committee approves the grant of all PSP awards across  
the Group.

The Group does not specifically invite employees to comment on 
the Directors’ Remuneration Policy but any comments made by 
employees are taken into account.

Total remuneration opportunity
The chart below demonstrates the total amount of remuneration 
payable to the Chief Executive, Robert Purcell and Finance Director, 
Ian Scapens, under the proposed Remuneration Policy for the year 
ending 31 March 2020 should they achieve minimum, on-target or 
maximum performance. The amounts shown represent £’000s, and 
for share-related elements, are the face value of awards.

The chart shows that at minimum levels of performance the Executive 
Directors’ only form of remuneration is the fixed element of base pay, 
benefits in kind and pension contributions.  

)

’

0
0
0
£
(
n
o
i
t
a
r
e
n
u
m
e
R

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

£364

£1,274

47%

24%

£664

22%

22%

£643

31%

31%

£243

£393
13%
25%

200

0

100%

56%

29%

100%

62%

38%

Minimum On-target

Maximum

Minimum

On-target

Maximum

Robert Purcell

Ian Scapens

PSP

Annual bonus

Salary, benefits and pension

74

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   74

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:49

 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Service contracts, remuneration and exit payments
As a matter of policy, the length of service contracts and notice periods is determined by the Committee at the time of appointment in light of 
the prevailing market practice. Details of the Executive Directors’ terms of appointment and notice periods are as follows:

Robert Purcell
Ian Scapens

Date of contract
21 January 2013
18 July 2017

Expiry date of current term/notice period
No specified term/terminable on 12 months’ notice
No specified term/terminable on 12 months’ notice

Other than normal payments due during notice periods, there are no express provisions for compensation on early termination of the Executive 
Directors’ contracts. In the event of early termination, the Company’s policy is to act fairly in all circumstances. The Committee has noted the 
Association of British Insurers’ and National Association of Pension Funds’ joint statement on Executive Contracts and Severance. None of the 
Executive Directors’ contracts provide for compensation in the event of a change of control of the Company. Copies of the service contracts are 
available for inspection by shareholders at the Company’s registered office.

Change of control
In the event of a change of control, any outstanding awards under the PSP may vest. Awards will become exercisable immediately. The 
proportion of award vesting will be determined by the Committee based on the proportion of the performance period completed and the extent 
to which the performance condition has been met at the date the change of control occurs. 

The Committee has discretion to waive any performance condition if it considers this appropriate in the particular circumstances.

Leavers
The Committee’s policy for exit payments on a leaver event involving an Executive Director is:

Item

Policy

Details

Salary, pension 
and benefits

A maximum of 12 months’ salary, pension and 
benefits may be payable.

Payments may be subject to mitigation if the leaver finds alternative 
employment.

Annual bonus

No annual bonus normally payable, unless the 
Committee uses its discretion to treat as a good 
leaver.

Good leavers are entitled to receive a bonus based on performance to 
date of termination, pro-rated for the period of service to termination.

PSP

In accordance with the PSP Rules, awards held 
by individuals leaving will lapse on cessation 
of employment, unless they are classified as a 
good leaver. Good leavers are those who leave 
for reason of death, retirement, ill-health or 
disability, or those for whom the Committee uses 
discretion to allow awards not to lapse.

Good leavers’ awards shall ordinarily vest at the normal vesting date, 
pro-rata based on the proportion of the vesting period completed and 
based on the extent to which the performance condition has been met. 

In the event of death, awards vest immediately subject to time pro-rating 
and assessment of performance. The Committee has discretion to 
accelerate vesting to date of cessation for other good leavers.

Awards may be exercised within a six-month period following date 
of leaving or vesting if later. In the case of death, the award may be 
exercised within a 12-month period following death.

In determining whether an individual should be treated as a good leaver or a bad leaver, and in assessing the extent to which any award 
will vest, the Committee will consider the specific circumstances of the departure, the individual’s performance prior to departure and the 
performance of the Company.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   75

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

75

22/08/2019   17:28:49

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Remuneration Policy

Approach to recruitment remuneration
In the event of the appointment of a new Director the same 
principles would apply as they do today to the existing Directors. The 
remuneration package of any new Executive Director would therefore 
include the elements set out on pages 71 to 74 in accordance with the 
Company’s Remuneration Policy and subject to the same discretions.

The Committee’s approach to recruitment remuneration is to set the 
base salary level in accordance with the Remuneration Policy and 
having taken into account the individual’s experience, the nature of 
the role and their existing remuneration package.

Where it is necessary to ‘buy out’ an individual’s awards from a 
previous employer, the Committee will seek to match the value, 
timing of vesting and type of awards of these awards with 
replacement awards. Any buy out awards would be an additional 
element of remuneration to the normal maxima as set out in the 
Policy table on pages 71 to 74.

In exceptional circumstances, the Committee may use discretion  
to grant an additional share-option award on joining, where it 
believes such an award is necessary to secure the recruitment of  
an Executive Director.

External non-executive directorships
The Board encourages Executive Directors to broaden their experience 
outside the Company by taking up a non-executive directorship.

Non-Executive Directors
The Company’s policy for Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration is 
managed by the Board. Their remuneration is confined to fees alone, 
with no performance-related element. Reasonable expenses are also 
reimbursed as incurred.

Fees for the Non-Executive Directors are determined by the Chairman 
and the Executive Directors. The level of fees is reviewed from time 
to time with regard to fees paid in comparable organisations and 
the time commitment required. The Chairman’s remuneration is 
determined by the Committee and is subject to the same basis of 
review as the other Non-Executive Directors. 

The letters of appointment for each of the Non-Executive Directors 
confirm that their appointment is for a specified term and that 
reappointment is not automatic. When making a decision on 
reappointment, the Board reviews the Non-Executive Director’s 
attendance and performance at meetings and the composition 
and skill of the Board as a whole. Each Non-Executive Director 
is appointed for an initial period of three years, subject to earlier 
termination by either party. Thereafter, the appointment may 
be renewed, provided that both the Non-Executive Director and 
the Board agree. Their respective appointments continue on an 
annual basis, subject to re-election at each AGM. The letters of 
appointment contain no provision for payment or compensation 
on early termination. Copies of the individual letters of appointment 
are available for inspection by shareholders at the Company’s 
registered office.

76

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   76

26479 

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof One

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:50

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Annual Report on Remuneration

Introduction
This section of the Directors’ Remuneration Report sets out the remuneration paid to Executive Directors and the fees paid to Non-Executive 
Directors for the financial year ending 31 March 2019. This section, together with the description of the composition of the Committee, which 
is set out on page 68 of the report, constitutes the Annual Report on Remuneration. The Annual Report on Remuneration will be subject to an 
advisory shareholder vote at the AGM on 17 July 2019.

Directors’ remuneration (audited information)
TOTAL REMUNERATION – SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE TABLE

The total remuneration for each Director for the period and for the prior year is set out below: 

Executive Directors

Robert Purcell

Ian Scapens

Non-Executive Directors’ fees

Mark Harper
John Allkins3
Ian Griffiths
David Landless
Tim Cooper4

Salary
 (£’000)

Benefits1 
(£’000)

Bonus2
(£’000)

LTIP 
(£’000)

Pensions 
(£’000)

Total 
(£’000)

2019
2018

2019
2018

300
300

200
195

29
19

13
13

60 
–

40 
–

– 
–

– 
–

2019  
£’000

115
11
43
43
14

45
45

30
29

434
364

283
237

2018 
£’000

Change5
£’000

113
39
41
40
–

1.8%
n/a
4.9%
7.5%
n/a

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Robert Purcell’s benefits disclosed for 2018 excluded £7,000 of fuel benefit. This has been included in the 2019 benefits figure. 

Before clawback of 25% outlined on page 78.

John Allkins resigned at the AGM on 18 July 2018.

Tim Cooper joined the Board on 14 November 2018.

Changes relate to the annual impact of increases and changes in roles outlined in last year’s report.

(1) Fixed elements of pay 
(I) BASE SALARY

Consistent with the key strategic goal of lowering the Group’s break-even point and the pay restraint that continued across the Group, neither 
the Chief Executive nor the Finance Director received an increase in annual salary during the period, which remained at £300,000 and £200,000 
respectively. These figures are reflected in the single total figure of remuneration table above.

The proportion of the Group’s basic salary bill attributable to the Executive Directors’ base salaries for the year ended 31 March 2019 was 
0.81%% (2018: 0.80%).

(II) PENSION

The Executive Directors’ only pension entitlements are Company contributions equivalent to 15% of base salary. During the year ended 31 March 
2019, cash payments of £45,000 (2018: £45,000) and £30,000 (2018: £29,000) were made by the Company to Robert Purcell and Ian Scapens, 
respectively. These figures are shown in the total remuneration table above.

(III) BENEFITS

Benefits received by the Executive Directors during the period included company car or car allowance and private healthcare. These figures are 
outlined in the total remuneration table above.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   77

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

77

22/08/2019   17:28:51

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Annual Report on Remuneration

Non-Executive Directors do not receive any benefits.

(2) Variable elements of pay – awards vested in the year
(I) ANNUAL BONUS (PAYABLE IN CASH) 

The annual bonus, which is payable in cash, provides the Executive Directors with the opportunity to receive an annual bonus of up to 100% of 
base salary on achievement of adjusted EBITDA and average net debt targets. For the year ended 31 March 2019, the annual bonus targets for 
Executive Directors were based upon the matrix below.

Adjusted EBITDA (£m)
21.8
22.8
23.8
24.3
24.8

Average Net Debt (£m)

33.9
–
20.0%
30.0%
45.0%
60.0%

33.4
15.0%
30.0%
45.0%
62.5%
80.0%

32.9
20.0%
35.0%
50.0%
70.0%
90.0%

32.6
30.0%
50.0%
70.0%
82.5%
95.0%

32.4
40.0%
65.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, closed defined benefit pension scheme charges and 
restructuring costs. Average net debt is the net sum of external borrowings, finance leases and cash and cash equivalents, measured at each 
month end to produce a simple annual average. 

The two metrics shown were structured as a matrix such that failure to deliver a minimum result in either metric led to no bonus being 
achievable in the other. Similarly, in order to achieve the maximum award, superior performance would be required against both metrics. 

For the year ended 31 March 2019, the adjusted EBITDA for the year was £23.4m and the average net debt was £34.2m (measured at budget 
exchange rates in accordance with the annual bonus rules). The Committee exercised discretion to adjust the average net debt for certain 
inventory increases necessary to support the successful move of the Chinese factory, but limited the impact of this discretion to 20% of the 
maximum bonus payable. As a result of the accounting issues identified in the Gears business unit subsequent to determining this bonus award, 
the Committee has agreed a clawback of 25% of the bonus paid to Executive Directors.

(II) PSP AWARDS PERFORMANCE TESTING

The performance period for PSP awards granted on 21 July 2016 completed on 31 March 2019. The performance conditions applying to these 
awards are as follows:

Threshold

Maximum

Award date
21 July 2016

EPS CAGR
10%

% Vesting
25%

EPS CAGR
15%

% Vesting
100%

Performance period
3 years to 31 March 2019

EPS decreased by 1.4% per annum between 2016 and 2019. As this is below the threshold growth of 10% p.a., none of the awards will vest.

(3) Variable elements of pay – awards made in the year 
Awards made to Executive Directors during the year under the PSP and associated performance conditions are set out below. Awards equal to 
200% and 100% of salary were made respectively to the Chief Executive and Group Finance Director.

Robert Purcell
Ian Scapens

Type of award
Nil–cost option
Nil–cost option

Face value
£600,000
£200,000

Number of 

shares1 Date of award
8 June 2018
8 June 2018

 2,078,282
692,761

1 

The number of shares is based on the average mid-market share price for the three business days preceding the date of grant (28.87 pence).

The year ended 31 March 2019 was the sixth year in which awards were made under the PSP. The performance conditions attaching to options 
granted under the PSP during the year are:

 •

 •

78

For the Group Finance Director, 100% of the award is based on the compound annual growth rate in adjusted EPS over a three-year period 
(EPS CAGR).

For the Chief Executive, 50% of the award is based on this EPS condition and 50% is based on TSR.

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   78

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:51

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The targets applying to the awards are as follows:

Award date
8 June 2018

Award date
8 June 2018

EPS CAGR
10%

TSR
42.2p

Threshold

% Vesting
25%

Threshold

% Vesting
25%

Maximum

EPS CAGR
15%

% Vesting

Performance period
100% 3 years to 31 March 2021

Maximum

TSR
72.2p

% Vesting

Performance period
100% 3 years to 31 March 2021

On achievement of threshold performance, 25% of the award vests. Straight-line vesting occurs between threshold and maximum performance.

(4) Payments to past Directors 
No payments were made to past Directors during the year in respect of services provided to the Company as a Director. No payments for loss of 
office were made to any Directors during the year.

Directors’ shareholding and share interests (audited information)
(i) VESTING HISTORY OF THE 2004 OPTIONS PLAN AND PSP

The following table shows the vesting history of the 2004 Options Plan and PSP over the last six years as a percentage of the total award to 
Executive Directors. 

Vesting %

Award 2010/11 
Vesting 2013/14
Nil

Award 2011/12 
Vesting 2014/15
Nil

Award 2012/13 
Vesting 2015/16
100%

Award 2013/14 
Vesting 2016/17
Nil

Award 2014/15 
Vesting 2017/18
Nil

Award 2015/16 
Vesting 2018/19
Nil

The vested awards relate to options awarded to Robert Purcell in the year ended 31 March 2013. Further details are set out on page 100 in the 
2016 Directors’ Remuneration Report.

(ii) DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS 

The beneficial interest of each of the Executive and Non-Executive Directors and their connected persons in the ordinary shares of the Company 
is detailed below and these amounts were unchanged between the year ended 31 March 2019 and the date of this report.

Robert Purcell
Ian Scapens (target required to be satisfied by 2022)

2 

3 

Comprised of 3,748,526 beneficially owned shares and 2,210,127 vested but unexercised options.

Based on a share price of 26.8p at 31 March 2019.

Non-Executive Directors
Mark Harper
Ian Griffiths
David Landless
Tim Cooper4

Shareholding 
requirement 
(% of salary)

200%
100%

Shareholding as 
per Remuneration 
Policy at
31 March 2019
5,958,6532
189,580

Shareholding 
at 31 March 20193
(% of salary)
532%
25%

Shareholding at
31 March 2019
608,449
10,000 
35,000
–

4 

Tim Cooper joined the Board on 14 November 2019.

There have been no changes in the interests of any current Director in the share capital of the Company between 1 April 2019 and the date of 
this report.

The Chief Executive and Finance Director are required to build up a shareholding as shown above over a five-year period. This includes 
beneficially owned shares and vested but unexercised options. Unvested shares are not counted within the shareholding requirement. The table 
above sets out the extent to which this requirement was met as at 31 March 2019. Ian Scapens joined the Company on 3 January 2017 and has 
until 2022 to satisfy the requirement. No such minimum shareholding requirement exists for Non-Executive Directors.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   79

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

79

22/08/2019   17:28:51

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Annual Report on Remuneration

(iii) DIRECTORS’ SHARE OPTIONS

Awards over shares in which the Executive Directors retain an interest are detailed in the table below and were unchanged between the year 
ended 31 March 2019 and the date of this report.

Options 
held at 
1 April 
2018

1,145,038

1,145,038
1,065,089

392,157
1,643,836
1,095,090
–
4,196,172
5,341,210

Options 
held at 
1 April 
2018
368,465
337,653
–
706,118

Number of share options

Granted 
in year

Lapsed 
in year

Exercised  
in year

–

–
– 

–

–
–

–
–
–
2,078,282
2,078,282
2,078,282

(392,157)
–
–
–
(392,157)
(392,157)

Number of share options

–

–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–

Granted 
in year
–
–
692,761
692,761

Lapsed 
in year
–
–
–
–

Exercised  
in year
–
–
–
–

Robert Purcell
2004 Options 
Plan
Total 2004 
Options Plan
PSP

Total PSP
Total

Ian Scapens
PSP

Total

Options 
held at 
31 March 
2019

Options 
vested at 
31 March 
2019

Option 
price (p)

Date from
 which 
exercisable

Expiry
date

1,145,038

1,145,038

26.20

21.01.2016

21.01.2023

1,145,038
1,065,089

1,145,038
1,065,089

–
1,643,836
1,095,090
2,078,282
5,882,297
7,027,335

–
–
–
–
1,065,089
2,210,127

Options 
held at 
31 March 
2019
368,465
337,653
692,761
1,398,879

Options 
vested at 
31 March 
2019
–
–
–
–

Nil

Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil

25.07.2016

25.07.2023

05.06.2018 05.06.2025
21.07.2026
21.07.2019
05.06.2020 05.06.2027
08.06.2021 08.06.2028

Option 
price (p)
Nil
Nil
Nil

Date from
Expiry
 which 
date
exercisable
16.01.2020
16.01.2027
05.06.2020 05.06.2027
08.06.2021 08.06.2028

The performance conditions for the share options are disclosed on pages 78 and 79 and are included in this audited information section by 
reference. None of the terms and conditions of the share options were varied in the year.

Performance graph and table 
The graph below shows the Company’s total shareholder return (share price growth plus dividends reinvested where applicable) for each of 
the last nine financial years of a holding of shares in the Company against a hypothetical holding of shares in the FTSE All-Share Industrial 
Engineering Index. The Committee considers this index to be an appropriate index for total shareholder return and comparison disclosure as it 
represents a broad equity index of which the Company is a constituent.

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Mar 09

80

Mar 10

Mar 11

Mar 12

Mar 13

Mar 14

Mar 15

Mar 16

Mar 17

Mar 18

Renold plc

FTSE All-Share Industrial Engineering Index

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   80

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:51

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Chief Executive’s remuneration for the years ended 31 March 2011 to 31 March 2019
The following table shows the history of the Chief Executive’s total remuneration and proportions of annual bonus and options vesting each year 
as a percentage of the maximum over the last nine years. 

Chief Executive’s total remuneration1 £’000
Annual bonus as % of maximum awarded
LTIP as % of maximum vesting

2011
667
81%
–

2012
494
44%
–

2013
311
16%
–

2014
659
100%
N/A

2015
561
67%
N/A

2016
1015
–
100%

2017
363
–
–

2018
364
–
–

2019
434
20%
–

1 

The values use the same methodology as that shown in calculating the single figure basis of remuneration in the table on page 77. 

Chief Executive pay and employee pay 
The table below shows the percentage change from the preceding financial year in respect of the total of the Chief Executive’s remuneration (on 
a single total remuneration basis as shown in the table on page 77).

Chief Executive
Workforce2

Percentage 
change 
in salary
–
<3%3

Percentage 
change 
in benefits
11%4
–

Percentage 
change 
in annual 
bonus
n/a
(9%)

2 

3 

4 

 The Group uses the UK workforce as an appropriate comparator group as the executives are based in the UK and the structure of remuneration varies 
considerably based on local market practice in other countries in which the Group operates.

The figures include only those employees who were not promoted and did not change role during the year to provide a like-for-like comparison.

Change in benefits for the Chief Executive has been calculated after aligning consistent treatment of fuel benefit.

Relative importance of spend on pay 
The table below sets out the total of the Executive Directors’ remuneration (on a single total remuneration basis as shown in the table on page 
77) compared to a number of other key financial metrics. The metrics chosen are considered of interest and relevance to both the Group’s actual 
performance in the period and also to be of relevance to different stakeholder groups.

2019
2018
Difference (%)

Employee 
remuneration
£71.5m
£70.2m
1.9%

Shareholder 
distributions
Nil
Nil
Nil

Market 
capitalisation
£60.4m
£65.4m
(7.6%)

Revenue5
£202.4m
£191.6m
5.6%

Adjusted 
operating  
profit5
£15.4m
£13.7m
12.4%

EBITDA6
£23.1m
£21.0m
10.0%

Executive 
Directors’ total 
remuneration
£0.7m
£0.6m
16.7%

5 

6 

Note 2 to the Company financial statements sets out the calculation of revenue and adjusted operating profit.

EBITDA is adjusted operating profit before depreciation and amortisation charges.

Statement of implementation of Remuneration Policy in the next financial year
Subject to approval of shareholders at the 2019 AGM, the Committee intends to operate the Remuneration Policy as set out in the Policy table 
and notes on pages 71 to 74 for three years from the date of the 2019 AGM. 

Base salary
Consistent with the timing of annual employee pay reviews across the Group, which are implemented with effect from 1 August, the 
Committee reviews base salaries for the Executive Directors annually. The next review will take place in July 2019 and any change implemented 
from 1 August 2019. The current base salaries for the Executive Directors are set out on page 77 and below:

Robert Purcell
Ian Scapens

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   81

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

£’000
300
200

81

22/08/2019   17:28:51

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Remuneration Report
Annual Report on Remuneration

Appointment details and fees of the Non-Executive Directors are set out below:

Name

Mark Harper

Ian Griffiths

David Landless

Tim Cooper

Date of appointment

1 May 2012

13 January 2010

9 January 2017

14 November 2018

Unexpired 
term (months)

23

16

9

32

Date of 
election/last 
re-election

Contractual 
fees

18 July 2018

£114,500

18 July 2018

18 July 2018

n/a

£42,500

£42,500

£37,000

Annual bonus
The performance measures for the 2019/20 annual bonus are unchanged from 2018/19. As set out on page 78, the performance measures are 
based upon a matrix of EBITDA and net debt performance conditions.

The performance targets for the annual bonus are based on internal targets and considered commercially sensitive. Performance targets will 
continue to be disclosed retrospectively in the Remuneration Report for 2019/20 in the interests of transparency.

Long Term Incentive Plan – PSP 
Subject to the proposed Remuneration Policy being approved by shareholders at the 2019 AGM, the performance conditions attaching to 
options that will be granted under the PSP in the year commencing 1 April 2019 are as follows:

100% of the award will be based on the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) in adjusted EPS over a three-year period (EPS CAGR).

 •
The targets applying to the award will be as follows:

Threshold

EPS CAGR
5%

% Vesting
25%

Maximum

EPS CAGR
10%

% Vesting
100%

Performance period
3 years to 31 March 2022

Performance under the EPS condition will be measured from the adjusted EPS for the year to 31 March 2019.

On achievement of threshold performance, 25% of the award vests. Straight-line vesting occurs between threshold and maximum performance.

Statement of shareholder voting 
The Directors’ Remuneration Report received shareholder support at the 2019 AGM held on 18 July 2018. Votes cast in respect of this resolution 
at the 2018 AGM are detailed in the table below. The Committee acknowledges the number of votes cast against. The replacement Remuneration 
Policy (outlined on pages 71 to 76) was developed in the knowledge of this vote and the Committee is consulting with shareholders ahead of 
presenting this new policy for approval at the AGM in July 2019.

Remuneration Report
Votes cast for
Votes cast against
Total
Votes withheld*

2018 AGM
114,632,326
39,178,064
153,810,390
99,524

%
74.53
25.47 

The Directors’ Remuneration Policy received significant shareholder support at the AGM held on 20 July 2016. Votes cast in respect of this 
resolution at the 2016 AGM are detailed in the table below.

Remuneration Policy

Votes cast for
Votes cast against
Total
Votes withheld*

2016 AGM

160,871,566
14,174,772
175,046,338
954,988

%

91.90
8.10 

*  A vote withheld is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the proportion of votes cast ‘for’ and ‘against’ a resolution.

Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

IAN GRIFFITHS
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the revisions outlined in Note 28)

82

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   82

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Directors’ Report

The Directors submit their report and the revised financial 
statements as set out on pages 98 to 149.

The Directors’ Report, which comprises pages 83 to 86, sets out 
certain information in relation to the Company in accordance with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and the FCA’s Listing and 
Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

The Strategic Report provides an overview of the performance of the 
business in the year ended 31 March 2019 and covers likely future 
developments in the business of the Company and the Group.

In accordance with section 414C (11) of the Companies Act 2006, 
information about the employment of disabled persons, employee 
involvement and greenhouse gas emissions, which is required to be 
included in the Directors’ Report, has been included in the Strategic 
Report. The Corporate Governance Report also forms part of the 
Directors’ Report. Where statutory disclosures have been made 
elsewhere in the Annual Report and Accounts, they are cross-
referenced in the table on page 86 and therefore incorporated  
by reference.

Revision of financial statements
These revised financial statements replace the original financial 
statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 which were approved 
by the Board on 28 May 2019. These revised financial statements 
are now the statutory financial statements for that year. They have 
been prepared as at the date of the original financial statements (28 
May 2019) and not as at the date of revision (23 August 2019) and 
accordingly do not deal with events between those dates.

The original financial statements did not comply with the Companies 
Act 2006 in the following aspects. Following publication of the Annual 
Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2019, the Board have 
identified that a revision is required to reflect the over-statement of 
certain assets and the under-statement of certain liabilities within 
the Gears business unit which is part of the Torque Transmission 
division. The over and under-statements have resulted in the profit 
for the year ended 31 March 2019 being over-stated by £1.0m in the 
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and net assets 
being over-stated by £2.5m in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as 
outlined in Note 28. The events surrounding these issues also give 
rise to the prior period adjustment as outlined in Note 27.

In order to properly reflect the amendments, the primary financial 
statements on pages 98 to 101 have been corrected along with the 
notes to the consolidated financial statements on pages 102 to 139. 
In order to reflect the revised financial statements, revisions have 
been made to the commentary within the Strategic Report and 
Governance sections of this report to ensure consistency with the 
revised financial statements.

The Companies Act 2006 requires that where revised financial 
statements are issued, a revised auditor’s report is issued and this is 
attached.

Under s454 of the Companies Act 2006 the directors have authority 
to revise annual financial statements, the strategic report, the 
directors’ report or directors’ remuneration report if they do not 
comply with the Act. The revised financial statements or report 
must be amended in accordance with The Companies (Revision of 
Defective Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 and in accordance 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

therewith do not take account of events which have taken place after 
the date on which the original financial statements were approved. 
The Regulations require that the revised financial statements show 
a true and fair view as if they were prepared and approved by the 
directors as at the date of the original financial statements.

Group
The Company is a public limited company incorporated in England 
and Wales with registered number 249688. It’s registered office is 
located at Trident 2, Trident Business Park, Styal Road, Wythenshawe, 
Manchester M22 5XB.

The Group is an international engineering group, producing a wide 
range of high-quality engineering products which are sold in over 100 
countries worldwide.

Results
Profit before tax for the year ended 31 March 2019 is £10.2m, 
compared with a profit of £0.9m for the year ended 31 March 2018.

Dividends
Details about dividend policy are set out in Note 6 of the Group 
financial statements.

The Board has decided to recommend that no ordinary dividend  
be paid in respect of the year ended 31 March 2019, but it will 
consider future dividend policy in the light of results from the 
business going forward.

Dividend payments in respect of the 6% cumulative preference stock 
in the Company were made on 1 July 2018 and 1 January 2019.

Directors’ appointment and replacement
The appointment and replacement of Directors of the Company is 
governed by its Articles of Association and legislation. The Company’s 
Articles of Association give power to the Board to appoint Directors 
to fill a vacancy or as additional Directors, but also require Directors 
to retire and submit themselves for election at the first AGM following 
their appointment. Tim Cooper was appointed as a Non-Executive 
Director of the Company on 14 November 2018; therefore, Tim will be 
standing for election at the 2019 AGM.

In addition, any Director who was not elected or re-elected at either 
of the two preceding AGMs must retire and seek re-election. Robert 
Purcell will be standing for re-election at the 2019 AGM. 

The Board has decided that all Non-Executive Directors are subject to 
annual election; please refer to the Corporate Governance Report on 
page 54 for further details. As a result, the remaining Non-Executive 
Directors, Mark Harper, Ian Griffiths, and David Landless will join Tim 
Cooper in standing for election/re-election at the 2019 AGM.

Under the terms of reference of the Nomination Committee, 
appointments to the Board are recommended by the Nomination 
Committee for approval by the Board. For a full description of the 
Company’s policy on appointments to the Board, see the Nomination 
Committee Report on pages 64 and 65.

Shareholders may also appoint a Director by ordinary resolution.

83

22/08/2019   17:28:52

Renold 2019-AR.indd   83

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Report

Directors’ interests
Details of the interests of the Directors and their connected persons 
in the Company’s share capital and in options held under the 
Company’s share option schemes, along with any changes in such 
interests since the end of the year, are detailed in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on pages 66 to 82. No Director had any 
interests in contracts of significance in relation to the Company’s 
business during the year.

Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance
Liability insurance for Directors and officers was maintained 
throughout the year. No qualifying third-party indemnity provision 
or qualifying pension scheme indemnity provision was in force when 
this Directors’ Report was approved or was in force during the year.

Conflicts of interest
The Company’s Articles of Association allow the Board to authorise 
potential conflicts of interest of Directors, on such terms (if any) as 
the Board thinks fit when giving any authorisation. Any decision of 
the Board to authorise a conflict of interest is only effective if it is 
approved without the conflicted Directors voting or without their 
votes being counted and, in making such a decision, the Directors 
must act in a way they consider in good faith will be most likely to 
promote the success of the Company. The Board considers that the 
procedures it has in place for reporting and considering conflicts of 
interest are effective and a review of previously approved conflicts is 
carried out annually.

Shares
SHARE CAPITAL

As at 31 March 2019, the issued share capital of the Company was 
£11,851,369 divided into 225,417,740 ordinary shares of 5p each and 
580,482 units of 6% cumulative preference stock of £1 each. 

The ordinary shares represent 95.1% of the Company’s total share 
capital and the preference stock represents 4.9%. The Company’s 
ordinary shares and preference stock are listed on the London Stock 
Exchange.

PURCHASE OF OWN SHARES

The Company obtained shareholder authority at the 2018 AGM to 
make market purchases of up to 22,541,774 ordinary shares in the 
Company, which remains outstanding until the conclusion of the 2019 
AGM. The minimum price which must be paid for any ordinary share 
is the nominal value of such share at the time of the purchase and 
the maximum price is that permitted under the FCA’s Listing Rules 
or, in the case of a tender offer, 5% above the average of the middle 
market quotations of the Company’s ordinary shares as derived from 
the London Stock Exchange’s Daily Official List for the five business 
days immediately preceding the date on which the tender offer 
is announced. As at the date of this report, the Company had not 
purchased any of its own ordinary shares in the market pursuant to 
such authority. The Directors will seek authority from shareholders 
at the 2019 AGM for the Company to purchase, in the market, up to 
22,541,774 of its own ordinary shares (which represents approximately 
10% of the Company’s ordinary share capital as at the date of this 
report) either to be cancelled or retained as treasury shares.

Details of the Company’s share capital are also set out in Note 19 to 
the Group financial statements.

The rights and obligations attaching to the Company’s shares are 
contained in the Company’s Articles of Association, a copy of which is 
available at www.renold.com or can be obtained upon request from 
the Company Secretary. The Articles of Association were adopted at 
the General Meeting held on 8 May 2019.

VOTING RIGHTS

The Directors confirm that no person has any special rights of control 
over the Company’s share capital and that no shares have been issued 
that carry any special rights with regard to control of the Company. 

Participants in employee share schemes have no voting or other 
rights in respect of the shares subject to those awards until the 
options are exercised, at which time the shares rank pari passu in 
all respects with shares already in issue. No such schemes carry any 
special rights with regard to control of the Company. 

No member shall, unless the Directors otherwise determine, be 
entitled to vote at a general meeting either personally or by proxy, 
or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in relation to 
meetings of the Company, if any call or other sum presently payable 
by him to the Company in respect of such shares remains unpaid. The 
Directors also have powers to suspend voting rights in certain limited 
circumstances when a shareholder has failed to comply with a notice 
issued under section 793 of the Companies Act 2006.

Full details of the deadlines for exercising voting rights and 
appointing a proxy or proxies in respect of the resolutions to 
be considered at the 2019 AGM are set out in the Notice of the 
forthcoming AGM.

84

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   84

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

MAJOR SHAREHOLDINGS 

As at the date of this report, the Company had been notified or is aware of the following major holdings of voting rights attached to its ordinary 
shares under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rule 5:

Shareholder
M&G Investment Funds
Tellworth Investments, LLP
Discretionary Unit Fund Managers Limited
Janus Henderson Investors Limited
Schroder Investment Management Limited
Canaccord Genuity Wealth Management
Royal London Asset Management

Number of  
voting rights1
33,397,739
29,030,403
27,000,000
25,495,747
13,914,253
13,360,000
7,810,000

% of total 
number of 
voting rights1
14.8%
12.9%
12.0%
11.3%
6.2%
5.9%
3.4%

1 

The number of voting rights and the percentage of voting rights are as at 21 May 2019.

No major shareholder had any interest in derivatives or financial instruments relating to shares carrying voting rights that are linked to the 
Company’s shares.

DIRECTORS’ RIGHTS IN RESPECT OF SHARES

TRANSFER OF SHARES

The Board, which is responsible for the management of the 
Company’s business, may exercise all the powers of the Company 
subject to the provisions of relevant legislation and the Company’s 
Articles of Association. The powers of the Directors set out in the 
Articles of Association include those in relation to the issue and 
buyback of shares.

ISSUE OF SHARES

The Directors are authorised to issue equity securities either by way 
of a rights issue or in any other way, provided that the shares issued 
other than by way of a rights issue, open offer or other pre-emptive 
offer or under the various share option schemes of the Company be 
limited to shares with an aggregate nominal value of £563,544.35, 
being equal to 5% of the aggregate nominal amount of the Company’s 
ordinary share capital in issue as at the date of the Notice of the 
Company’s 2018 AGM. The authority will expire at the forthcoming 
AGM. The Directors will seek authority from shareholders at the 2019 
AGM to issue equity securities either by way of a rights issue or in 
any other way, provided that the shares issued other than by way 
of a rights issue, open offer or other pre-emptive offer or under the 
various share option schemes of the Company be limited to shares 
with an aggregate nominal value of £563,544.35.

In addition, the Directors have authority to allot shares up to a 
maximum nominal amount of £7,506,410, representing approximately 
two-thirds of the issued ordinary share capital as at the date of 
the Notice of the Company’s 2018 AGM. The authority will expire 
at the forthcoming AGM. The Directors will seek authority from 
shareholders at the 2019 AGM to allot shares up to a maximum 
nominal amount of £7,506,410, representing approximately 66.6% 
of the issued ordinary share capital as at the date of the Notice of 
the AGM.

The registration of transfers may be suspended at such times and 
for such periods as the Directors may determine. The Directors may 
refuse to register the transfer of any share which is not a fully paid-
up share and may refuse to register any transfer in favour of more 
than four persons jointly. The Directors may also refuse to recognise 
any instrument of transfer unless it is in respect of any one class 
of share, is lodged at the requisite place and, where appropriate, 
is accompanied by any relevant share certificate and such other 
evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show the right 
of the transferor to make the transfer. 

The Directors may suspend transfers where a shareholder has failed 
to comply with a notice issued under section 793 of the Companies 
Act 2006. 

There are no other restrictions on the transfer of shares in the 
Company other than certain restrictions which may from time to time 
be imposed by laws and regulations (e.g. insider trading laws and 
market requirements relating to close periods) and pursuant to the 
FCA’s Listing Rules whereby certain employees of the Company require 
the approval of the Company to deal in the Company’s securities.

The Directors are not aware of any agreements between holders of 
securities which may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities 
or voting rights.

Donations
During the year, the Group made no political donations.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   85

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

85

22/08/2019   17:28:52

GOVERNANCE

Directors’ Report

Contracts: Change of control provisions
The Company’s main UK banking facilities agreement with HSBC 
UK Bank Plc, CitiBank N.A. and AIB Group (UK) Plc contains a change 
of control provision. This requires the Company to provide notification 
to the agent in the event of a change of control. The banks may 
then demand cancellation and repayment of the commitments and 
the loans. 

The share subscription and shareholders’ agreement between L. G. 
Balakrishnan & Bros Ltd, Renold International Holdings Limited and 
Renold Chain India Private Limited dated 24 June 2008 contains 
certain change of control provisions. On the change of control of a 
shareholder (being one of the parties to the agreement), the other 
shareholder has a right to terminate the agreement and/or to require 
the shareholder suffering the change of control to sell, at a fair price, 
all of its equity shares to the terminating shareholder or a nominee of 
such shareholder. 

No other material contracts contain change of control provisions. 

There are no agreements between the Company and its Directors 
or employees providing for compensation for loss of office or 
employment (whether through resignation, purported redundancy 
or otherwise) that occurs because of a takeover bid. 

Note 18 to the Group financial statements details the Group’s 
obligations to contribute to the UK defined benefit pension schemes.

Details of the effect of any change of control in relation to awards 
under the Long-Term Incentive Plan are set out on page 75 within the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) of the Company will be 
held at the Manchester International Office Centre, Styal Road, 
Wythenshawe, Manchester M22 5WB on 17 July 2019 at 11.00am.

The resolutions being proposed at the 2019 AGM will be general 
in nature, including the renewal for a further year of the limited 
authority of the Directors to allot the unissued share capital of 
the Company and to issue shares for cash other than to existing 
shareholders (in line with the Pre-Emption Group’s Statement of 
Principles). A resolution will also be proposed to renew the Directors’ 
authority to purchase a portion of the Company’s own shares. 
Resolutions will be proposed to renew these authorities, which would 
otherwise expire at the 2019 AGM. 

One of the areas of special business to be addressed at this AGM is 
the proposal to extend the authority to disapply pre-emption rights 
by a further 5% of the issued ordinary share capital, such additional 
authority to be used only for limited purposes, which will be set out 
in the Notice of Meeting of the AGM. 

Auditor
Deloitte LLP has confirmed its willingness to continue in office as 
Auditor of the Company. In accordance with section 489 of the 
Companies Act 2006, separate resolutions for the reappointment 
of Deloitte LLP as Auditor of the Company and for the Directors 
to determine the Auditor’s remuneration will be proposed at the 
2019 AGM. 

Going Concern
After making enquiries, we, the Directors, have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue 
in operational existence for the foreseeable future. We therefore 
continue to adopt the Going Concern basis in preparing the 
financial statements.

The basis on which this conclusion has been reached is set out on 
page 103 which is incorporated by reference here.

Other disclosures
Directors’ biographical details and date of 
appointment
Employee involvement
Employment of disabled persons
Financial instruments Note 25 to the Group financial 
statements
Greenhouse gas emissions
Important events affecting the Group since 31 March 
2019 Note 26 to the Group financial statements
Statement on disclosure to Auditor
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

48 and 49
40 to 43
42

131 to 135
45

135
86
86

The Directors’ Report was approved by the Board on 23 August 2019.

For and on behalf of the Board:

ANDREW BATCHELOR
COMPANY SECRETARY

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

86

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   86

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Directors’ Responsibilities Statement

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of 
the corporate and financial information, included on the Company’s 
website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation 
and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation 
in other jurisdictions.

Responsibility statement 
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

 •

 •

The financial statements, prepared in accordance with the 
relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view 
of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of 
the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation 
taken as a whole; and

The Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development 
and performance of the business and the position of the Company 
and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a 
whole, together with a description of the principal risks and 
uncertainties that they face.

The Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are 
fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, 
business model and strategy.

This responsibility statement was approved by the Board of Directors 
on 23 August 2019 and is signed on its behalf by:

By order of the Board

ROBERT PURCELL 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE 

IAN SCAPENS
FINANCE DIRECTOR

23 August 2019 
(updated from 28 May 2019 for changes directly consequential to the 
revisions outlined in Note 28)

23 August 2019 

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the 
financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements 
for each financial year. Under that law the Directors are required 
to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the 
European Union and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation and have elected 
to prepare the Parent Company financial statements in accordance 
with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United 
Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law), including FRS 101 
‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’. Under company law, the Directors 
must not approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they 
give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of 
the profit or loss of the Company for that period. 

In preparing the Parent Company financial statements, the Directors 
are required to:

 •

Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them 
consistently;

 • Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable, 

relevant and prudent;

 •

 •

State whether FRS101 Reduced Disclosure Framework/applicable 
UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and explained in the financial 
statements; and

Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis 
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will 
continue in business.

In preparing the Group financial statements, International Accounting 
Standard 1 requires that Directors:

 •
 •

 •

Properly select and apply accounting policies ;

Present information, including accounting policies, in a manner 
that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable 
information; 

Provide additional disclosures when compliance with the 
specific requirements in IFRSs are insufficient to enable users to 
understand the impact of particular transactions, other events 
and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial 
performance; and

 • Make an assessment of the Group and Company’s ability to 

continue as a going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting 
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s 
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that 
the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They 
are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and 
hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of 
fraud and other irregularities.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   87

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

87

22/08/2019   17:28:52

GOVERNANCE

Shareholder Information

The Company’s website, www.renold.com, which presents additional 
information about the Group, is regularly updated and includes 
the posting of the interim and final preliminary results and interim 
management statements on the day they are announced. 

Report a scam 
If you are approached by fraudsters, please tell the FCA using the 
share fraud reporting form at www.fca.org.uk/scams, where you can 
find out more about investment scams. 

You can also call the FCA Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768. 

If you have already paid money to share fraudsters you should 
contact Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040.

If you wish to advise a change of name, address, or dividend 
mandate, please contact the Company’s registrar, Link Asset Services, 
whose contact details appear on page 150. Alternatively, you can 
view up-to-date information and manage your shareholding through 
Link’s share portal where you will be able to access and maintain 
your holding at your own convenience. You will require your unique 
investor code, which can be found on your share certificate. The URL 
for the portal is: www.signalshares.com.

Beware of share fraud
Fraudsters use persuasive and high-pressure tactics to lure investors 
into scams. They may offer to sell shares that turn out to be 
worthless or non-existent, or to buy shares at an inflated price in 
return for an upfront payment. While high profits are promised, if you 
buy or sell shares in this way you will probably lose your money.

How to avoid share fraud
 •

Keep in mind that firms authorised by the FCA are unlikely to 
contact you out of the blue with an offer to buy or sell shares. 

Do not get into a conversation; note the name of the person 
and firm contacting you and then end the call. 

Check the Financial Services Register (the Register) from 
www.fca.org.uk to see if the person and firm contacting you 
is authorised by the FCA. 

Beware of fraudsters claiming to be from an authorised firm, 
copying its website or giving you false contact details. 

Use the firm’s contact details listed on the Register if you want 
to call it back. 

Call the FCA on 0800 111 6768 if the firm does not have contact 
details on the Register or you are told they are out of date. 

Search the list of unauthorised firms to avoid at 
www.fca.org.uk/scams. 

Consider that if you buy or sell shares from an unauthorised firm 
you will not have access to the Financial Ombudsman Service or 
Financial Services Compensation Scheme. 

Think about getting independent financial and professional 
advice before you hand over any money. 

Remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is! 

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

88

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   88

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Renold plc

Report on the audit of the revised financial statements
Opinion
In our opinion:

 •

 •

 •

 •

the revised financial statements of Renold plc (the ‘parent company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘group’) give a true and fair view, seen at the 
date the original financial statements were approved, of the state of the group’s and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 March 2019 
and of the group’s profit for the year then ended;

the revised group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) 
as adopted by the European Union;

the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting 
Practice including Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’; and

the revised financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as they have effect 
under the Companies (Revision of Defective Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 and, as regards the revised group financial statements, 
Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

We have audited the revised financial statements which comprise:

 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •
 •

the consolidated statement of comprehensive income;

the consolidated and parent company balance sheets;

the consolidated and parent company statements of changes in equity;

the consolidated statement of cash flows;

accounting policies;

the related notes 1 to 28 to the revised group financial statements; and

the related notes 1 to 13 to the parent company financial statements.

These revised financial statements replace the original financial statements approved by the directors on 28 May 2019. The financial reporting 
framework that has been applied in the preparation of the revised group financial statements is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by the 
European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the parent company financial statements is 
applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (United Kingdom Generally 
Accepted Accounting Practice). The revised financial statements have been prepared under the Companies (Revision of Defective Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2008 and accordingly do not take account of events which have taken place after the date the original financial statements 
were approved.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under 
those standards are further described in the auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the revised financial statements section of our report. 

We are independent of the group and the parent company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the 
revised financial statements in the UK, including the Financial Reporting Council’s (the ‘FRC’s’) Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest 
entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We confirm that the non-audit services 
prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the group or the parent company.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Emphasis of matter – revision of historical accounting errors relating to Renold Gears
We draw attention to the Accounting Policies and Notes 27 and 28 in the financial statements, which describes the need for revision of the 
consolidated financial statements arising from the identification of historical accounting errors over the three years ending 31 March 2017, 
2018 and 2019, arising from an intentional overstatement of certain asset values, understatement of certain liabilities, and thus an overall 
overstatement of profit over this period relating to the Renold Gears divisions. The original group financial statements were signed on 28 May 
2019 and our previous audit report was signed on that date. We have not performed a subsequent events review for the period from the date of 
our previous auditor’s report to the date of this report. Our opinion is not modified in this respect.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   89

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

89

22/08/2019   17:28:52

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Renold plc

Summary of our audit approach

Key audit matters

The key audit matters that we identified in the current year were:

 •
 •
 •

The carrying value of inventory

Impairment of goodwill

Intentional misstatements identified at Renold Gears

Materiality

Scoping

We determined materiality for revised financial statements for the Group to be £510,000 which is 5% of 
statutory pre-tax profit of £10.2 million. 

As a consequence of the audit scope determined, we achieved coverage of approximately 85% of revenue, 85% 
of profit before tax and 95% of net assets.

Significant changes in our 
approach from prior year

Our approach is consistent with the previous year with the exception of the removal of deferred tax asset 
recognition and pension liability assumptions as key audit matters for the 2019 audit report.

In 2019 we no longer consider deferred tax asset recognition to be a key audit matter. This assessment is 
based on our risk assessment procedures, the consistency of management’s applicability of internal policy, and 
financial performance of the business.

We also no longer consider the pension liability assumptions underpinning the UK defined benefit pension 
scheme to be a key audit matter. This follows considerations of the historical experience of testing of the 
scheme liability assumptions.

The scoping of our audit was also revised to bring the Chinese component into full scope for FY19, replacing the 
Australian component (which was downgraded to review scope) and Singaporean component (following the 
closure of the business).

Significant changes to our 
approach – revised financial 
statements

As a result of the control breakdowns and intentional misstatements at the Renold Gears business (as 
discussed in Note 1), we updated our risk assessment. In doing this we considered the causal factors and risk 
of misstatement in each of the Group’s locations, and also considering the findings of the independent Internal 
Audit investigation. 

We have also identified the intentional misstatements identified at Renold Gears as a key audit matter within 
this report. 

We have also reduced our materiality at a Group and component level (specific to Renold Gears) in response  
to the misstatements identified.

Conclusions relating to going concern, principal risks and viability statement
GOING CONCERN

We have reviewed the directors’ statement in the Accounting Policies to the revised financial statements about 
whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them and 
their identification of any material uncertainties to the group’s and company’s ability to continue to do so over  
a period of at least twelve months from the date of when the original financial statements were authorised  
for issue.

We confirm that we have 
nothing material to report, 
add or draw attention to in 
respect of these matters.

We considered as part of our risk assessment the nature of the group, its business model and related risks 
including where relevant the impact of Brexit, the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework 
and the system of internal control. We evaluated the directors’ assessment of the group’s ability to continue as 
a going concern, including challenging the underlying data and key assumptions used to make the assessment, 
and evaluated the directors’ plans for future actions in relation to their going concern assessment.

We are required to state whether we have anything material to add or draw attention to in relation to that 
statement required by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) and report if the statement is materially inconsistent with our 
knowledge obtained in the audit.

90

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   90

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND VIABILITY STATEMENT

Based solely on reading the directors’ statements and considering whether they were consistent with the 
knowledge we obtained in the course of the audit, including the knowledge obtained in the evaluation of the 
directors’ assessment of the group’s and the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, we are required 
to state whether we have anything material to add or draw attention to in relation to:

We confirm that we have 
nothing material to report, 
add or draw attention to in 
respect of these matters.

 •

 •

 •

the disclosures on pages 30 to 36 that describe the principal risks and explain how they are being managed  
or mitigated;

the directors’ confirmation on page 32 that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks 
facing the group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or 
liquidity; or

the directors’ explanation on page 37 as to how they have assessed the prospects of the group, over what 
period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to 
whether they have a reasonable expectation that the group will be able to continue in operation and meet 
its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing 
attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

We are also required to report whether the directors’ statement relating to the prospects of the group required 
by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit.

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the revised financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we 
identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and 
directing the efforts of the engagement team.

These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the revised financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, 
and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

The carrying value of inventory
Key audit matter description

As shown in Note 11 the Group holds inventory of £44.3m (2018: £40.8m). As discussed in the Audit 
Committee report on page 60 and in the accounting policies on page 104 management judgement is 
applied to the cost of inventories in order to accurately reflect the manufacturing costs incurred in 
bringing them to their current condition and physical location. This primarily relates to the assessment 
of direct labour costs incurred, manufacturing overheads to be absorbed and other relevant production 
costs.

A risk surrounding the carrying value of inventory when compared to the net realisable value as a 
result of inadequate provisioning has also been identified. Establishing a provision for slow-moving, 
obsolete and damaged inventory involves estimates and judgements, taking into account forecast sales 
and historical usage information. 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   91

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

91

22/08/2019   17:28:52

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Renold plc

How the scope of our audit responded  
to the key audit matter

Key observations
Impairment of goodwill 
Key audit matter description

How the scope of our audit responded  
to the key audit matter

Key observations

We performed the following audit procedures in order to address this risk:

 • We evaluated the design and implementation of relevant controls relating to the assessment of 

inventory valuation and inventory provisioning.

On a sample basis, we have performed the following audit procedures:

 •
 •

Agreed the cost of raw materials to third party supplier invoices;

For work in progress and finished goods, we obtained the bill of material and tested the underlying 
costs within each stock item;

 • We challenged the key assumptions concerning overhead absorption by assessing the 

appropriateness of costs included in the calculation; and

 •

Assessed the net realisable value (NRV) on a sample basis of stock items by agreeing their 
subsequent sales price to customer invoices to ensure that the items were being held at the lower 
of cost and NRV.

We also:

 •

Gained an understanding of the movements in the inventory provision year on year and an 
assessment of the scale of the provision in comparison to the gross stock value, to determine 
whether there are any unusual transactions;

Recalculated the value of the provision based on a sample of items; and

 •
 • Where manual adjustments have been made to the provision, we have understood these by 

gaining supporting documentation and have challenged the underlying rationale applied in arriving 
at such adjustments. 

We have concluded that the group inventory balance is materially appropriate as at 31 March 2019. 

The goodwill balance of £23.1m (2018: £21.6m) as shown in Note 7 principally relates to Jeffrey Chain 
and is supported by an annual impairment review.

We have determined that as a result of the range of potential outcomes with regards to the carrying 
value of the CGUs, we have identified this key audit matter as a potential fraud risk area. 

As discussed on the Audit Committee report on page 60, and in the accounting policies on page 104, 
the key audit matter identified is in respect of Management’s judgements in relation to the financial 
forecasts of the business units. These include discount rates and perpetuity growth rates used to 
determine the value in use of the cash generating units, which are subjective and could lead to an 
impairment charge if incorrect.  
We performed the following audit procedures in order to address this risk:

 • We evaluated the design and implementation of relevant controls concerning management’s 

impairment review process; 

 • We have evaluated the future cash flows forecasts and the process by which they are drawn 
up, including confirming the accuracy of the underlying calculations and checking whether the 
forecasts are consistent with the latest Board approved forecasts;

 • We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s budgets and forecasts by comparing them to 

actual performance and verifying the mathematical accuracy of the cash flow models;

 • We utilised our specialists to assess the appropriateness of the discount rate derived from a 

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) applied by management in their discounted cash flows; 
and

 • We also assessed whether the disclosures in the accounting policies of the revised financial 

statements appropriately disclose the key judgements taken so that the reader of the revised 
financial statements is aware of the impact on the revised financial statement of changes to key 
assumptions that may lead to impairment.

We have not identified any issues with regards to audit procedures performed in relation to the 
carrying value of the goodwill balance held at the year-end. 

92

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   92

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Intentional misstatements identified at Renold Gears
Key audit matter description

During the year-end audit, Deloitte identified a number of observations relating to the control 
environment and numerical misstatements at Renold Gears. A number of these misstatements were 
corrected during the audit process, and whilst the remaining uncorrected misstatements were not 
material to the Group financial statements, they were indicative of control failings at Renold Gears. 

How the scope of our audit responded  
to the key audit matter

As such Deloitte recommended a further investigation into the controls and processes be undertaken by 
management subsequent to the audit to further improve the financial reporting process at this component. 

Management subsequently led an initial investigation into the issues raised specific to Renold Gears 
and identified a number of deliberate misstatements across the balance sheet spread across a number 
of financial periods.

As a result, a further detailed independent investigation was subsequently sponsored by the Audit 
Committee, as described in the Audit Committee Report, led by Internal Audit and supported by 
an independent forensic accounting team, to verify the findings above and identify contributory 
control weaknesses linked to this and remediation actions required, as described in the Corporate 
Governance Report.

As noted in the Chairman’s Letter, it has since been determined that the misstatements identified were as 
a result of intentional and deliberate misstatements perpetrated by an individual at Renold Gears over the 
past three financial periods to order to disguise true financial performance reported to Group management. 

To perpetrate these misstatements, a large number of falsified schedules were created and supported by 
intentionally amended documentation/reconciliations designed to mislead Group management, Internal 
Audit (during a review undertaken in FY19) and Deloitte across a number of balance sheet areas. 

This led to an overstatement of the balance sheet as previously reported at 31 March 2019 of £2.5 
million, which has impacted on the financial results of 2017 and 2018, as described in the Accounting 
Policies and Notes 27 and 28, as a result of intentional misstatement of results at Renold Gears.

As such, we have determined that a key audit matter exists with regards of the completeness and 
accuracy of the corrections posted by management to correct the misstatements across the three 
financial periods.
Procedures performed specific to Renold Gears were as follows:

 •

 •

In conjunction with our Forensics Specialist team, we have reviewed the scope and the results of 
the independent investigation into the intentional misstatements identified, including minutes of 
the interviews held with the individual responsible at Renold Gears, and the conclusions reached 
therein to determine whether they were deemed to be an appropriate scope and approach in 
relation to the issues identified; 

Through detailed review of the investigation’s findings, discussions with executive management 
and those charged with governance, and via considering the risk of similar adjustments being 
made at other components within the Group, we have considered the risk of contagion threat 
and as to whether the fraudulent entries identified at Renold Gears could be prevalent at further 
components within the Group, or at a Group level; 

 • We have tested the adjustments proposed by Group management to the impacted balances on a 
line by line basis. This has been performed by challenging the completeness and accuracy of the 
revised documentation provided by Group management used to support the adjustments made to 
correct the previously misstated entries. This testing has been performed in conjunction with audit 
testing performed on the revised closing position to a reduced level of materiality. In performing 
this testing on the revised closing position, all balances have been tested against revised 
supporting evidence provided by management, placing no reliance on explanations and internally 
generated information previously provided by the individual who perpetrated the misstatements 
during the original audits;

 • We have challenged management as to the classification of the periods in which the impact was 

noted in the P&L in line with the requirements of IAS 8 ‘Accounting policies, Changes in Accounting 
Estimates, and Errors’, and tracing back the original fraudulent entry back to its initial posting as 
described in Note 27; and

 • We have considered the completeness and transparency of the disclosures provided within 
the Revised Financial Statements in describing the issues identified at Renold Gears and the 
disclosures relating to the elements of the corrections relating to prior periods. 

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   93

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

93

22/08/2019   17:28:52

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Renold plc

Key observations

We were satisfied that the corrections made by management and the allocation of them across the 
three financial periods identified are considered reasonable and in line with the requirements of IAS 8.

We are also satisfied, following our review of the internal investigation, supported by our forensic 
specialists, that management’s judgement that the intentional misstatements identified at Renold 
Gears were isolated to this component was appropriate.

The disclosures made by management within the Strategic Report and notes to the financial 
statements are considered to be appropriate in describing the issue identified and in disclosing the 
impact identified on prior periods. 

Our application of materiality
We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the revised financial statements that makes it probable that the economic decisions 
of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or influenced. We use materiality both in planning the scope of our audit work and in 
evaluating the results of our work.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the revised financial statements as a whole as follows:

Materiality 
(as originally reported)
Materiality  
(revised financial statements)
Basis for determining materiality

Rationale for the benchmark 
applied

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
£565,000 (2018: £592,000)

PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
£426,000 (2018: £473,200)

£510,000 

£426,000 

5% of statutory pre-tax profit (2018: 6.5% of adjusted 
pre-tax profit) 
Pre-tax profit is determined to be the most stable basis 
of underlying business performance.   

The parent company materiality represents 
approximately 0.6% (2018: 0.7%) of equity
As a non-trading parent company, equity is the key 
driver of the company

The reduction in the materiality in relation to the 
Revised Financial Statements is due to the reduction in 
pre-tax profit arising from the corrections identified in 
relation to the fraudulent entries in Renold Gears which 
impacted on FY19 pre-tax profit.

We originally agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of £28,000 (2018: 
£30,000), as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. This has subsequently been 
updated to £25,500, following the revisions to materiality as noted above. We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that we 
identified when assessing the overall presentation of the revised financial statements.

An overview of the scope of our audit 
The Group operates from a number of locations across the globe, albeit principally in Europe, Asia and the Americas, with its head office based 
in the UK. Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including Group-wide controls, and 
assessing the risks of material misstatement at the Group level. Based on that assessment, we focused our Group audit scope primarily on the 
audit work at 15 locations (2018: 15 locations). 4 (2018: 5) of these were subject to a full audit, 4 (2018: 5) were subject to an audit of specified 
account balances where the extent of our testing was based on our assessment of the risks of material misstatement and of the materiality of 
the Group’s operations at those locations. The remaining 7 (2018: 5) were subject to review procedures. These locations covered 85% of Group’s 
revenue, 85% of the Group’s pre-tax profit and 95% of the Group’s net assets. They were also selected to provide an appropriate basis for 
undertaking audit work to address the risks of material misstatement identified above. Our audit work at the 15 locations was executed at levels 
of materiality applicable to each individual entity which were lower than Group materiality, being between £226,000 and £283,000 (excluding 
the parent company component materiality which is disclosed separately above). In the prior year component materiality ranged from £225,000 
and £284,000.

At the Parent entity level we also tested the consolidation process and carried out analytical procedures to confirm our conclusion that there 
were no significant risks of material misstatement of the aggregated financial information of the remaining components not subject to audit or 
audit of specified account balances.

Our audit work has included the use of component auditors, which form part of the Deloitte member firm network. We planned and revised the 
component auditor’s work, including issuing referral instructions to them and evaluating the results of the work performed. The Group audit 
team follow a programme of planned visits that has been designed so that a senior member of the Group audit team visits each of the locations 
where the Group audit scope was focused on a rotation basis and the most significant of them at least once a year. In years when we do not visit 
a significant component we will include the component audit team in our team briefing, discuss their risk assessment, attend key meetings via 
conference call, and review documentation of the findings from their work. During the current year audit, a senior member of the Group audit 
team visited three locations across the US and China. 

94

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   94

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:52

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

UPDATES FOR THE REVISED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
As noted earlier in this report, the corrections made by management in relation to the fraud identified at Renold Gears was identified as a Key 
Audit Matter for the Revised Financial Statements.

Furthermore, we revised our risk assessment for Renold Gears to order to increase the extent of our testing and sample sizes on the underlying 
financial results of the business, in conjunction with a reduction of component materiality in relation to Renold Gears from £225,000 to 
£204,000. We have also reduced our component performance materiality, which is determined for purposes of developing our audit plan, 
including driving the nature, timing, and extent of planned further audit procedures from £202,500 to £142,800.

The audit of the financial information in relation to Renold Gears was undertaken directly by the Group audit team. 

Based on the conclusions of the considerations in relation to the risk of wider contagion threat across the Group being satisfactory, and the level 
of component materialities identified across the Group remaining appropriate in comparison to the revised Group materiality, no amendments 
were deemed to be required in relation to the remaining component audit approach for FY19.

Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included 
in the annual report, other than the revised financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Our opinion on the revised financial statements does not cover the other information and, except  
to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

We have nothing to 
report in respect of these 
matters.

In connection with our audit of the revised financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information 
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the revised financial 
statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine 
whether there is a material misstatement in the revised financial statements or a material misstatement of the 
other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of 
this other information, we are required to report that fact.

In this context, matters that we are specifically required to report to you as uncorrected material misstatements of 
the other information include where we conclude that:

 •

 •

 •

Fair, balanced and understandable – the statement given by the directors that they consider the annual report 
and revised financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the 
information necessary for shareholders to assess the group’s position and performance, business model and 
strategy, is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit; or

Audit committee reporting – the section describing the work of the audit committee does not appropriately 
address matters communicated by us to the audit committee; or

Directors’ statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code – the parts of the directors’ 
statement required under the Listing Rules relating to the company’s compliance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code containing provisions specified for review by the auditor in accordance with Listing Rule 
9.8.10R(2) do not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code.

Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the revised financial 
statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to 
enable the preparation of revised financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the revised financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group’s and the parent company’s ability to continue 
as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the 
directors either intend to liquidate the group or the parent company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. 

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the revised financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the revised financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level 
of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it 
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be 
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these revised financial statements.

Details of the extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud are set out below.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the revised financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/
auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   95

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

95

22/08/2019   17:28:52

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Renold plc

We are also required to report whether in our opinion the original financial statements failed to comply with the requirements of the Companies 
Act 2006 in the respects identified by the directors. The audit of revised financial statements includes the performance of procedures to assess 
whether the revisions made by the directors are appropriate and have been properly made.

Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud 
We identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and then design and 
perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, including obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for 
our opinion.

Identifying and assessing potential risks related to irregularities

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement in respect of irregularities, including fraud and non-compliance with laws and 
regulations, our procedures included the following:

 •

enquiring of management, internal audit and the audit committee, including obtaining and reviewing supporting documentation, concerning 
the group’s policies and procedures relating to:

 •
 •
 •
 •

 •

identifying, evaluating and complying with laws and regulations and whether they were aware of any instances of non-compliance;

detecting and responding to the risks of fraud and whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud;

the internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations;

discussing among the engagement team, including material component audit teams, and involving relevant internal specialists, including 
tax, valuations, pensions and IT, specialists regarding how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements and any potential 
indicators of fraud, in particular in relation to the impairment of goodwill and revenue recognition; and

obtaining an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that the group operates in, focusing on those laws and regulations 
that had a direct effect on the financial statements or that had a fundamental effect on the operations of the group. The key laws and 
regulations we considered in this context included the UK Companies Act, Listing Rules, pensions and tax legislation.

Audit response to risks identified

As a result of performing the above, we identified impairment of goodwill as a key audit matter. The key audit matters section of our report 
explains the matter in more detail and also describes the specific procedures we performed in response to that key audit matter.

In addition to the above, our procedures to respond to risks identified included the following:

 •

 •
 •

 •
 •

 •

reviewing the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with relevant laws and 
regulations discussed above;

enquiring of management, the audit committee and in-house / external legal counsel concerning actual and potential litigation and claims;

performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement due 
to fraud;

reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance, reviewing internal audit reports and reviewing correspondence with HMRC;

in addressing the risk of fraud through management override of controls, testing the appropriateness of journal entries and other 
adjustments; assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias; and evaluating the 
business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business; and

performing cut-off testing at the year-end in relation to revenue.

We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members including internal 
specialists, and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.

UPDATES FOR THE REVISED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Our responses in regards to the intentional misstatements at Renold Gears are reported within the Key Audit Matter response earlier in this 
report. The revised risk assessment procedures in relation to Renold Gears are also discussed within the overview of the scope of our audit 
section of this report.

In addition to this we have revisited our audit work the following the areas referenced above:

 •

 •
 •

96

reviewing the financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation to assess compliance with relevant laws and 
regulations in relation to Revised Financial Statements; 

enquiring of management, the audit committee, and Internal Audit in relation to the specific issues identified at Renold Gears; and

reading the Internal Audit and Forensic Accounting report from PwC, including minutes of the interviews held with the individual responsible 
at Renold Gears. 

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   96

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, the original financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 failed to comply with the requirements of the Companies  
Act 2006 in the respects identified by the directors in the statement contained in Note 28 to these revised financial statements.

In our opinion the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies  
Act 2006.

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

 •

 •

the information given in the revised strategic report and the revised directors’ report for the financial year for which the revised financial 
statements are prepared is consistent with the revised financial statements; and

the revised strategic report and the revised directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and of the parent company and their environment obtained in the course of the 
audit, we have not identified any material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors’ report.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

 • we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
 •

adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate  
for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

 •

the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records  
and returns.

Directors’ remuneration

We have nothing to report in respect of 
these matters.

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are also required to report if in our opinion certain disclosures  
of directors’ remuneration have not been made or the part of the directors’ remuneration report  
to be audited is not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.

We have nothing to report in respect of 
these matters.

Other matters

Auditor tenure

Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Board 21 July 2015 to audit the financial statements for the 
year ending 31 March 2016 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and 
reappointments of the firm is 4 years, covering the years ending 31 March 2016 to 31 March 2019.

Consistency of the audit report with the additional report to the audit committee

Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee we are required to provide in accordance with ISAs (UK).

Use of our report
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with the Companies (Revision of Defective Accounts and Reports) 
Regulations 2008. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those matters we are required to 
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility 
to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have 
formed.

Simon Manning FCA (Senior statutory auditor)
For and on behalf of Deloitte LLP
Statutory Auditor
Leeds, United Kingdom
23 August 2019

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   97

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

97

22/08/2019   17:28:53

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Statement  
of Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 31 March 2019

2019 
Statutory 
£m

2019 
Adjustments 
£m

2019 
Adjusted1 
£m

Note

Revenue
Operating costs 

Operating profit 
Operating profit is analysed as:
Before adjusting items
Restructuring costs
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill
Pension past service credits
Pension administration costs

Operating profit
Financial costs
Net IAS 19R financing costs
Net financing costs

Profit before tax
Taxation

Profit/(loss) for the financial year
Other comprehensive income/(expense):
Items that may be reclassified to the income 
statement in subsequent periods:
Foreign exchange translation differences
Foreign exchange differences on  
loans hedging the net investment  
in foreign operations
Gains arising on cash flow hedges

Items not to be reclassified to the income 
statement in subsequent periods:
Remeasurement losses on retirement  
benefit obligations
Tax on remeasurement losses on retirement 
benefit obligations

Other comprehensive expense for the year, 
net of tax
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for 
the year, net of tax
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest

Earnings/(loss) per share
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

All results are from continuing operations.

1
2

2

3

4

5

202.4
(187.2)
15.2

15.2
–
–
–
–
–
15.2
(2.6)
(2.4)
(5.0)
10.2
(3.5)
6.7

2.7

(0.5)
(0.7)
1.5

(11.2)

2.1
(9.1)

(7.6)

(0.9)

(1.1)
0.2
(0.9)

2.9p
2.8p

–
0.2
0.2

–
2.9
0.9
–
(4.4)
0.8
0.2
0.4
2.4
2.8
3.0
0.6
3.6

202.4
(187.0)
15.4

15.2
2.9
0.9
–
(4.4)
0.8
15.4
(2.2)
–
(2.2)
13.2
(2.9)
10.3

2018 
Adjustments
(restated2)
£m

2018 
Adjusted1
(restated2)
£m

–
8.6
8.6

–
4.7
0.9
2.1
–
0.9
8.6
0.1
2.4
2.5
11.1
1.3
12.4

191.6
(177.9)
13.7

5.1
4.7
0.9
2.1
–
0.9
13.7
(1.7)
–
(1.7)
12.0
(2.3)
9.7

2018 
Statutory 
(restated2) 
£m

191.6
(186.5)
5.1

5.1
–
–
–
–
–
5.1
(1.8)
(2.4)
(4.2)
0.9
(3.6)
(2.7)

(5.9)

0.8
0.4
(4.7)

2.8

(1.6)
1.2

(3.5)

(6.2)

(6.3)
0.1
(6.2)

4.5p
4.3p

(1.2p)
(1.2p)

4.3p
4.2p

1 

2 

98

Adjusted for the after tax effects of pension administration costs, restructuring costs, changes in the provision discounts, IAS 19R financing costs, impairment of 
goodwill and amortisation of acquired intangible assets (see page 109).

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   98

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Balance Sheet
as at 31 March 2019

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents

Non-current assets classified as held for sale

TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Borrowings
Trade and other payables
Current tax
Derivative financial instruments
Provisions

NET CURRENT ASSETS
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
Preference stock
Trade and other payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Retirement benefit obligations
Provisions

TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET (LIABILITIES)/ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued share capital
Share premium account
Capital redemption reserve
Currency translation reserve
Other reserves
Retained earnings

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent
Non-controlling interests
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)/EQUITY

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement. 

Approved by the Board on 23 August 2019 and signed on its behalf by:

ROBERT PURCELL  
Chief Executive  

IAN SCAPENS
Finance Director

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Note

7
8
9
17

11
12
25
13

10

14
15

25
16

14
14
15
17
18
16

19

21
21
21
21

2019
£m

23.1
6.6
55.5
21.5
106.7

44.3
37.5
–
17.6
99.4
–
99.4
206.1

–
(42.1)
(0.4)
(0.4)
(0.8)
(43.7)
55.7

(47.4)
(0.5)
(5.4)
(5.6)
(101.9)
(2.5)
(163.3)
(207.0)
(0.9)

11.3
30.1
15.4
10.4
(0.4)
(69.9)
(3.1)
2.2
(0.9)

2018
(restated1)
£m

2017
(restated1)
£m

21.6
8.3
47.3
20.6
97.8

40.8
36.1
0.4
13.9
91.2
–
91.2
189.0

(1.3)
(40.2)
(1.2)
–
(4.6)
(47.3)
43.9

(36.4)
(0.5)
(0.3)
(4.2)
(97.4)
(3.3)
(142.1)
(189.4)
(0.4)

11.3
30.1
15.4
7.1
1.4
(67.7)
(2.4)
2.0
(0.4)

26.4
9.7
46.8
20.9
103.8

40.2
36.7
–
16.4
93.3
0.3
93.6
197.4

(0.8)
(42.2)
(4.2)
(0.1)
(3.6)
(50.9)
42.4

(32.5)
(0.5)
(0.3)
(0.3)
(102.0)
(4.1)
(139.7)
(190.6)
6.8

26.7
30.1
–
12.2
1.0
(65.9)
4.1
2.7
6.8

99

22/08/2019   17:28:53

Renold 2019-AR.indd   99

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Statement  
of Changes in Equity
 for the year ended 31 March 2019

Share 
capital
£m 
Note 19

Share 
premium 
account
£m 

Retained 
earnings
£m 
Note 21 

Currency 
translation 
reserve
£m 
Note 21

Capital 
redemption 
reserve
£m
Note 21

Other 
reserves 
£m 
Note 21

Attributable 
to owners  
of parent
£m 
Note 21

Non- 
controlling 
interests
£m 

At 31 March 2017 as  
previously reported
Prior period adjustment
At 31 March 2017 (restated1)
Loss for the year (restated1)
Other comprehensive
income/(expense)
Total comprehensive income/
(expense) for the year
Reclassification for cancellation of 
deferred shares
Employee share options:
 – value of employee services
At 31 March 2018 (restated1)
Profit for the year 
Other comprehensive income/
(expense)
Total comprehensive income/
(expense) for the year
Employee share options:
 – value of employee services

26.7
–
26.7
–

–

–

(15.4)

–

11.3
–

–

–

–

30.1
–
30.1
–

–

–

–

–

30.1
–

–

–

–

At 31 March 2019

11.3

30.1

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

(64.9)
(1.0)
(65.9)
(2.8)

1.2

(1.6)

 –

(0.2)

(67.7)
6.5

(9.1)

(2.6)

0.4

(69.9)

12.2
 –
12.2
 –

(5.1)

(5.1)

 –

 –

7.1
 –

3.3

3.3

 –

10.4

 –
 –
 –
 –

 –

 –

15.4

 –

15.4
 –

 –

 –

 –

15.4

1.0
 –
1.0
 –

0.4

0.4

 –

 –

1.4
 –

(1.8)

(1.8)

 –

(0.4)

5.1
(1.0)
4.1
(2.8)

(3.5)

(6.3)

 –

(0.2)

(2.4)
6.5

(7.6)

(1.1)

0.4

(3.1)

Total 
equity
£m

7.8
(1.0)
6.8
(2.7)

2.7
 –
2.7
0.1

(0.8)

(4.3)

(0.7)

(7.0)

 –

 –

2.0
0.2

 –
 –
(0.2)

(0.4)
6.7

 –

(7.6)

0.2

(0.9)

 –

2.2

0.4

(0.9)

100

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   100

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statement  
of Cash Flows
for the year ended 31 March 2019

Cash flows from operating activities (Note 24)
Cash generated from operations
Income taxes paid

Net cash from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from property disposals
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Purchase of intangible assets
Consideration paid for acquisition

Net cash from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Financing costs paid
Proceeds from borrowings
Repayment of borrowings

Net cash from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Net cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Effects of exchange rate changes

Net cash and cash equivalents at end of year (Note 13)

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

2019
£m

10.1
(1.8)
8.3

–
(9.2)
(1.6)
–
(10.8)

(3.0)
12.0
–
9.0
6.5
12.3
(1.4)
17.4

2018
(restated1)    
£m

9.8
(3.8)
6.0

0.5
(8.6)
(1.4)
(1.2)
(10.7)

(1.7)
3.9
(0.1)
2.1
(2.6)
15.4
(0.5)
12.3

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   101

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

101

22/08/2019   17:28:53

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounting Policies

To aid the reader of the financial statements, certain accounting 
policies can be found in the relevant notes.

BASIS OF PREPARATION

Statement of compliance

Renold plc is a public limited company incorporated and domiciled 
in the United Kingdom. The consolidated financial statements of 
the Company comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together 
referred to as the Group). The Company’s financial statements present 
information about the Company as a separate entity and not about the 
Group. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in 
accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU. In addition, the financial 
statements have been prepared in accordance with those parts of the 
Companies Act 2006 applicable to groups reporting under IFRS.

The Parent Company has elected to prepare its parent company 
financial statements in accordance with FRS 101; these are presented 
on pages 141 to 149. The financial statements were approved by the 
Board on 23 August 2019.

BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the 
historical cost convention, except where otherwise indicated. The 
accounting policies as set out below have been applied consistently 
to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements 
except for the adoption of IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 which have not had 
a material effect on the financial statements and consequently no 
transition adjustments are presented.

REVISION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These revised financial statements replace the original financial 
statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 which were approved 
by the Board on 28 May 2019. These revised financial statements 
are now the statutory financial statements for that year. They have 
been prepared as at the date of the original financial statements (28 
May 2019) and not as at the date of revision (23 August 2019) and 
accordingly do not deal with events between those dates.

The original financial statements did not comply with the Companies 
Act 2006 in the following respect. Following publication of the Annual 
Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2019, the Board have 
identified that a revision is required to reflect the over-statement of 
certain assets and the under-statement of certain liabilities within the 
Gears business unit which is part of the Torque Transmission division. 
The over and under-statements have resulted in the profit for the year 
ended 31 March 2019 being over-stated by £1.0m in the Consolidated 
Statement of Comprehensive Income and net assets being over-stated 
by £2.5m in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as outlined in Note 28. 
The events surrounding these issues also give rise to the prior period 
adjustment as outlined in Note 27.

In order to properly reflect the amendments, the primary financial 
statements on pages 98 to 101 have been corrected along with the 
notes to the consolidated financial statements on pages 102 to 139.

The Companies Act 2006 requires that where revised financial 
statements are issued, a revised auditor’s report is issued and this is 
attached.

Under s454 of the Companies Act 2006 the directors have authority 
to revise annual financial statements, the strategic report, the 
directors’ report or directors’ remuneration report if they do not 
comply with the Act. The revised financial statements or report must 
be amended in accordance with The Companies (Revision of Defective 
Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 and in accordance therewith 
do not take account of events which have taken place after the 
date on which the original financial statements were approved. The 
Regulations require that the revised financial statements show a true 
and fair view as if they were prepared and approved by the directors 
as at the date of the original financial statements. 

PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS

As noted in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report a prior period 
adjustment has been recorded in these accounts following the 
identification of historical accounting issues over the three years 
ending 31 March 2017, 2018 and 2019, arising from an overstatement 
of certain asset values and profit over this period by £2.5m in the 
Gears business unit, which is part of the Torque Transmission division. 
No other business units are involved.

An independent internal audit investigation, supported by external 
advisors, initiated by the Board has found that adjusted operating 
profit for the Torque Transmission division, and therefore the Group, 
was overstated by £1.0m for the year to 31 March 2017, by £0.5m for 
the year to 31 March 2018 and by £1.0m for the year to 31 March 2019. 
The impact of this restatement on a line item basis is set out in Note 
27.

FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY

These consolidated financial statements are presented in Pounds 
Sterling, which is the Group’s functional currency.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional 
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the 
transaction or average rates where applicable. Foreign exchange gains 
and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and 
from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets 
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in 
the income statement, except for monetary items that form part of 
the net investment in foreign operations which are taken to other 
comprehensive income.

Assets and liabilities of overseas subsidiaries are translated into 
Pounds Sterling at the exchange rates at the end of the financial year. 
Income statements and cash flows are translated at the appropriate 
average rates of exchange for the year. Differences on exchange 
arising on the retranslation of net assets in overseas subsidiaries, 
borrowings used to finance or provide a hedge against those 
investments and from the translation of the results at average rates 
are taken directly to other comprehensive income. On loss of control 
of a foreign entity, related exchange differences previously recognised 
in other comprehensive income are recognised in the income 
statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial 
statements of the Company and the entities controlled by the 
Company made up to 31 March each year.

102

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   102

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition 
method. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a 
subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities 
incurred and equity interests issued by the Group in exchange for 
control of the acquired entity. Consideration transferred also includes 
the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent 
consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs are expensed 
in operating costs as incurred. All identifiable assets and liabilities 
acquired and contingent liabilities assumed are initially measured at 
their fair values at the acquisition date.

The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any 
non-controlling interest and the acquisition date fair value of any 
previously held equity interest in the acquired entity as compared 
with the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets are recognised as 
goodwill. Where the Group’s share of identifiable net assets acquired 
exceeds the total consideration transferred, a gain from a bargain 
purchase is recognised immediately in the income statement after the 
fair values initially determined have been reassessed.

(a) Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities that are controlled by the Group. Control 
is exerted where the Group has the power to govern, directly or 
indirectly, the financial and operating policies of the entity so as to 
obtain economic benefits from its activities. Typically, a shareholding 
of more than 50% of the voting rights is indicative of control. 
However, the impact of potential voting rights currently exercisable is 
taken into consideration.

The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the 
consolidated financial statements of the Group from the date that 
control is obtained to the date that control ceases. The accounting 
policies of new subsidiaries are changed where necessary to align 
them with those of the Group.

Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries 
are identified separately from the Group’s equity therein. They are 
initially measured at the non-controlling interest’s share of the net 
fair value of the assets and liabilities recognised or at fair value, as 
determined on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis. Subsequent to 
acquisition, non-controlling interests consist of the amount of those 
interests at the date of the original business combination and the 
non-controlling interest’s share of the changes in equity since the date 
of the combination.

The results and financial position of Renold Scottish Limited 
Partnership (SLP) have been consolidated in the consolidated financial 
statements of Renold plc. Renold plc is the parent undertaking of the 
general partner in the SLP (see Note (xiii) to the Company financial 
statements). To determine that Renold plc has control over the SLP, 
we considered the following activities, benefits and risks:

Activities – The SLP was established by Renold plc as a means of 
funding its pension obligation in an efficient manner.

Benefits – During the 25-year period, the Renold Pension Scheme 
will receive substantially all of the SLP’s income. However, after 
this period, the Renold Group is entitled to any remaining income 
generated in the SLP, together with any other residual value in  
the SLP.

Risks – The Group bears the risks incidental to the activities of the 
SLP because it retains the obligation to ensure the pension scheme is 
appropriately funded.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Accordingly, advantage has been taken of the exemption conferred by 
paragraph 7 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008 from 
the requirements for preparation, delivery and publication of the 
partnership’s accounts.

(b) Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income 
and expense arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated 
in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealised gains 
arising from transactions with equity accounted investments are 
eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in that investment. 
Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, 
but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

GOING CONCERN

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. 
In determining the appropriate basis of preparation of the financial 
statements, the Directors are required to consider whether the Group 
can continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.

Further information in relation to the Group’s business activities, 
together with the factors likely to affect its future development, 
performance and position is set out in the Strategic Report on pages 
6 to 45.

The financial position of the Group, its cash flows, liquidity position 
and borrowing facilities are described in the Strategic Report on 
pages 6 to 45. In addition, Note 24 to the financial statements 
includes the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for managing 
its capital, its financial risk management objectives, details of its 
financial instruments and hedging activities and its exposure to 
foreign exchange, credit and interest rate risk. Further details of the 
Group’s cash balances and borrowings are included in Notes 13, 14 
and 24 of the financial statements. There were no significant post 
balance sheet events to report (see Note 25). 

The Directors have assessed the future funding requirements of the 
Group and the Company and compared them to the level of available 
borrowing facilities. The assessment included a detailed review of 
financial and cash flow forecasts, financial instruments and hedging 
arrangements for at least the 12-month period from the date of 
signing the Annual Report and Accounts. The Directors considered a 
range of potential scenarios within the key markets the Group serves 
and how these might impact the Group’s cash flow, facility headroom 
and banking covenants. The Directors also considered what mitigating 
actions the Group could take to limit any adverse consequences. The 
Group’s forecasts and projections show that the Group should be able 
to operate within the level of its borrowing facilities and covenants.

Having undertaken this work, the Directors are of the opinion that 
the Company and the Group have adequate resources to continue 
in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, 
they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the 
consolidated financial statements.

103

22/08/2019   17:28:53

Renold 2019-AR.indd   103

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounting Policies

REVENUE

(a) Impairment of non-financial assets

Revenue for goods sold is recognised at the value of the consideration 
specified in the contract with the customer for the sale of goods net 
of sales rebates, discounts, VAT and other sales related taxes and 
after eliminating sales within the Group. Revenue is recognised when 
the performance obligations of the Group, principally the obligation 
to despatch or deliver the specified goods, are satisfied. Revenue is 
recognised on the following basis:

(a) Sale of goods

Revenue is recognised on the sale of goods when the performance 
obligations of the Group, principally the obligation to despatch or 
deliver the specified goods, are satisfied, which is consistent with 
when the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred from the 
Group to the customer. This is normally the point of despatch to the 
customer when title passes.

(b) Sales rebates and discounts

These comprise customer discounts and rebates which are sales 
incentives to customers to encourage them to purchase increased 
volumes and are related to total volumes purchased and sales growth 
or incentives for early payment. They are recognised in the same 
period as the sales to which they relate based upon management’s 
best estimate of the amount necessary to meet claims made by the 
Group’s customers in respect of these rebates and discounts such 
that the revenue recognised equals the consideration specified in the 
contract net of contractual rebates and discounts.

DISCOUNTS RECEIVED FROM SUPPLIERS

These comprise rebates and discounts received from suppliers as 
incentives to purchase increased volume or early settlement of 
amounts payable. They are recognised within operating costs over the 
period to which the contract or purchase relates.

CRITICAL JUDGEMENTS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE GROUP’S 
ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

In the course of preparing the financial statements, no judgements 
have been made in the process of applying the Group’s accounting 
policies other than those involving estimations (below), that have 
had a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial 
statements.

KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION AND UNCERTAINTY

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and 
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities 
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the 
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and 
expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates 
are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and 
actions, actual results ultimately may differ from those estimates.

However, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could 
result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the 
carrying value of the Group’s assets or liabilities in the future.

The key sources of estimation uncertainty that have a potential risk 
of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and 
liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:

The Group assesses whether there are any indicators of impairment 
for all non-financial assets at each reporting date. Goodwill is tested for 
impairment annually and at other times when such indicators exist.

When value in use calculations are undertaken, management must 
estimate the expected future cash flows from the asset or cash 
generating unit and choose a suitable discount rate in order to 
calculate the net present value of those cash flows. Further details are 
included in Note 7.

(b) Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets in respect of pension liabilities are recognised in 
full (with the exception of Germany where the amount recognised is 
offset by a deferred tax liability in relation to the German tax base of 
the pension liability) given the business has a legal obligation to make 
the underlying pension contributions and it is probable that adequate 
taxable profit will be available to take advantage of the associated 
taxable deductions. Deferred tax assets are recognised for all unused 
tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will 
be available against which the losses can be utilised. Significant 
management judgement is required to determine the amount of 
deferred tax assets that can be recognised, based upon the likely 
timing and level of future taxable profits together with future tax 
planning strategies. Actual outcomes may vary which could require 
a material adjustment to the carrying amounts. Further details are 
contained in Note 17.

(c) Retirement benefit obligations

The valuation of the Group’s defined benefit plans are determined 
by using actuarial valuations. These involve making assumptions 
about discount rates, future salary increases, mortality rates and 
future pension increases. Due to the long-term nature of these plans 
such estimates are subject to significant uncertainty. Net interest is 
calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit 
liability. Further details are given in Note 18.

(d) Onerous lease

The Group has assessed an existing operating lease obligation at the 
Bredbury facility and concluded that an onerous lease provision is 
required following the cessation of significant manufacturing activity 
at the site. This involves making assumptions upon future sub-let 
income streams and the discount rate used. An additional onerous 
lease provision was created following the sale and leaseback of the 
Australian Mulgrave facility in March 2017. For further details refer to 
Notes 2(c) and 16.

(e) Inventory valuation

Manufactured inventory and work in progress include amounts of 
attributable indirect costs incurred in the production process. The 
Group employs a standard cost methodology which, while including 
judgements and assumptions, seeks to allocate the allowable indirect 
production costs in a logical and appropriate manner.

ADOPTION OF NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS

(i) New and revised accounting standards adopted by the Group

During the year, the International Accounting Standards Board and 
International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee have 
issued the following standards, amendments and interpretations, 

104

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   104

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

which are considered relevant to the Group. Their adoption has not 
had any significant impact on the amounts or disclosures reported in 
these financial statements.

 •

 •

IFRIC 22 ‘Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance 
Consideration’

IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers was issued in 
2014 and replaces IAS 18 Revenue. It provides a single model of 
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers based 
on the identification and satisfaction of performance obligations, and 
revenue from contracts with customers will be distinguished from 
other sources. The Group has adopted IFRS 15 with effect from 1 April 
2018, and has elected to apply the modified retrospective transition 
approach. 

IFRS 15 does not represent a material change from the Group’s 
current practice as the point of revenue recognition on transfer 
of ownership of goods is unchanged, being the point at which 
the Group’s performance obligations, principally the obligation to 
despatch or deliver the specified goods, are satisfied. Accounting for 
revenue from long-term contracts has also not changed materially. As 
there has not been any material effect on the Group’s accounting or 
disclosures, no transition adjustments have been presented.

 •

IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’

As the Group’s only derivatives are foreign exchange forward 
contracts held with the group’s banking partners and designated 
as cash flow hedges, the adoption of IFRS 9 has not had any 
impact on the measurement or classification of derivative and the 
Group’s hedging relationships under IAS 39 qualify as continuing 
hedging relationships under IFRS 9. The adoption of IFRS 9 has led 
to an amendment to the calculation of impairment reflecting the 
requirement to use the expected credit loss approach. This has not 
had a material impact on the Group’s provisioning for credit losses. 

(ii) New and revised accounting standards and interpretations which 
were in issue but were not yet effective and have not been adopted 
early by the Group

At the date of publishing these financial statements the following 
new and revised standards and interpretations, which are considered 
relevant to the Group, were in issue but were not yet effective (and in 
some cases had not yet been adopted by the EU). None of these new 
and revised standards and interpretations have been adopted early 
by the Group:

 •
 •

 •

 •

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’;

AS 19, Plan Amendments, Curtailment or Settlement 
(Amendments to IAS 19);

Annual Improvements of IFRS Standards 2015-2017 Cycle 
(IFRS 3, IFRS 11, IAS 12, IAS 23); and

IFRIC 23 ‘Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments’.

The above standards and interpretations have not been adopted in 
these financial statements and will be adopted in accordance with 
their effective dates. An impact assessment has been performed for 
each of the standards, amendments and interpretations effective 
from 31 March 2019, with no significant financial impact being 
identified. Further details are provided below in relation to the new 
standards effective from 2019 that are expected to have a material 
impact on the accounts:

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

IFRS 16 ‘LEASES’

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ will be effective from 1 April 2019 for Renold and 
introduces changes to lessee accounting by removing the distinction 
between operating and finance leases. Consequently, all leases, 
except short-term (under 12 months) and low value leases, will be 
accounted for on balance sheet with a ‘right of use’ asset and lease 
liabilities reflecting the discounted value of lease payments.

Information on the undiscounted amount of the Group’s non-
cancellable operating lease commitments as defined under IAS 17, the 
current leasing standard, as at 31 March 2019 is disclosed in Note 22. 
The Group’s operating leases impacted by IFRS 16 principally include 
real estate, vehicles, and factory machines.

For existing operating leases, the Group will apply the retrospective 
cumulative catch up approach by calculating the retrospective 
application of the standard and recognising the cumulative effect as 
an adjustment to opening retained earnings with no restatement of 
comparative information.

Upon transition the Group will also apply the following transition 
options and practical expedients: 

 •

 •
 •

 •
 •

Application of a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with 
similar characteristics;

Exclude initial direct costs from the right-of-use assets; 

Reliance on previous assessment of onerous leases and deduction 
of onerous lease provisions from initial right-of-use asset 
recognised;

Use hindsight when assessing the lease term; and 

Not to reassess whether a contract is or contains a lease.

The Group will elect to account for lease payments as an expense on a 
straight line basis over the life of the lease for:

 •

 •

Leases with a term of 12 months or less and containing  
no purchase options; and

Leases where the underlying asset has a value of less  
than $5,000.

The impact of adoption will be to increase EBITDA and operating 
profit as operating lease costs currently charged under IAS 17 will be 
reclassified to depreciation and interest expenses which are excluded 
from EBITDA (although included in profit before tax). The interest cost 
will be front-end loaded, which will result in higher costs earlier in the 
lease than under IAS 17 and lower costs towards the end of the lease. 
Operating cash flow will increase under IFRS 16 as the payments are 
reclassified as financing cash flows for interest and principal. The net 
increase/decrease in cash and cash equivalents will remain the same.

The Group estimates that the financial impact of adopting IFRS 16 will 
be to: 

 •

 •

 •
 •
 •

Recognise a £9.9m right-of-use asset and a £17.6 million additional 
lease liability on adoption; 

De-recognise the £3.2m onerous lease provisions held at 31 March 
2019 (netted off the right-of-use asset);

Recognise a £4.5m adjustment to opening reserves;

Increase FY20 operating profit by £0.6m; and 

Increase FY20 finance costs by £0.4m.

105

22/08/2019   17:28:53

Renold 2019-AR.indd   105

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

1. Segmental information
For management purposes, the Group is organised into two operating segments according to the nature of their products and services and these 
are considered by the Directors to be the reportable operating segments of Renold plc as shown below:

 •

 •

The Chain segment manufactures and sells power transmission and conveyor chain and also includes sales of torque transmission products 
through Chain National Sales Companies (NSCs); and

The Torque Transmission segment manufactures and sells torque transmission products, such as gearboxes and couplings.

No operating segments have been aggregated to form the above reportable segments.

The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) for the purposes of IFRS 8: ‘Operating Segments’ is considered to be the Board of Directors of 
Renold plc. Management monitor the results of the separate reportable operating segments based on operating profit and loss which is 
measured consistently with operating profit and loss in the consolidated financial statements. The same segmental basis applies to decisions 
about resource allocation. Disclosure has not been included in respect of the operating assets of each segment as they are not reported to the 
CODM on a regular basis. However, Group net financing costs, retirement benefit obligations and income taxes are managed on a Group basis 
and therefore are not allocated to operating segments. Transfer prices between operating segments are on an arm’s length basis in a manner 
similar to transactions with third parties.

Year ended 31 March 2019
Revenue
External customer
Inter-segment1

Total revenue
Adjusted operating profit/(loss) 
Pension administration costs 
Pension past service credit
Restructuring costs
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

Operating profit/(loss)
Net financing costs

Profit before tax

Other disclosures
Working capital3
Capital expenditure4

Depreciation and amortisation included in adjusted operating profit/loss
Amortisation of acquired intangibles
Total depreciation and amortisation

Chain2
£m

Torque 
Transmission
£m

Head office 
costs and 
eliminations
£m 

Consolidated
£m 

163.9
1.0
164.9
18.4
–
–
(2.2)
(0.9)
15.3

26.8
13.0

5.0
0.9
5.9

38.5
4.4
42.9
3.1
–
–
–
–
3.1

10.6
0.9

1.6
–
1.6

–
(5.4)
(5.4)
(6.1)
(0.8)
4.4
(0.7)
–
(3.2)

2.0
1.3

1.1
–
1.1

202.4
–
202.4
15.4
(0.8)
4.4
(2.9)
(0.9)
15.2
(5.0)
10.2

39.4
15.2

7.7
0.9
8.6

1 

2 

3 

4 

106

Inter-segment revenues are eliminated on consolidation.

 Included in Chain external sales is £4.2m (2018: £4.9m) of Torque Transmission product sold through the Chain NSCs, usually in countries where Torque 
Transmission does not have its own presence.

The measure of segment assets reviewed by the CODM is total working capital, defined as inventories and trade and other receivables, less trade and other 
payables. Working capital is also measured as a ratio of rolling annual sales.

Capital expenditure consists of additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   106

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:53

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

1. Segmental information continued

Year ended 31 March 2018 (restated5)
Revenue
External customer
Inter-segment1

Total revenue
Adjusted operating profit/(loss)
Pension administration costs 
Restructuring costs
Impairment of goodwill
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets

Operating profit/(loss)
Net financing costs

Profit before tax

Other disclosures
Working capital3
Capital expenditure4

Depreciation and amortisation included in adjusted operating profit/(loss)
Amortisation of acquired intangibles
Total depreciation and amortisation

Chain2
£m 

Torque 
 Transmission
£m

Head office 
costs and 
eliminations
£m 

Consolidated
£m 

153.1
1.4
154.5
14.7
–
(3.9)
(2.1)
(0.9)
7.8

25.9
7.2

4.8
0.9
5.7

38.5
3.9
42.4
4.3
–
(0.2)
–
–
4.1

10.5
0.9

1.6
–
1.6

–
(5.3)
(5.3)
(5.3)
(0.9)
(0.6)
–
–
(6.8)

0.1
1.3

0.9
–
0.9

191.6
–
191.6
13.7
(0.9)
(4.7)
(2.1)
(0.9)
5.1
(4.2)
0.9

36.5
9.4

7.3
0.9
8.2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Inter-segment revenues are eliminated on consolidation.

 Included in Chain external sales is £4.2m (2018: £4.9m) of Torque Transmission product sold through the Chain NSCs, usually in countries where Torque 
Transmission does not have its own presence.

The measure of segment assets reviewed by the CODM is total working capital, defined as inventories and trade and other receivables, less trade and other 
payables. Working capital is also measured as a ratio of rolling annual sales.

Capital expenditure consists of additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

The Group uses a variety of alternative performance measures, which are non-IFRS, to assess the performance of its operations. The Group 
considers these performance measures to provide useful historical financial information to help investors evaluate the underlying performance 
of the business by adjusting for volatility created by one-off items and non-trading performance-related costs, such as amortisation and legacy 
pensions costs.

The two consistently applied performance measures which are disclosed within this annual report and accounts include adjusted results and 
underlying results.

Adjusted results exclude the impact of restructuring costs, pension financing charges, pension administration costs, pension past service costs, 
impairment of goodwill and the amortisation of acquired intangible assets and the tax thereon. A reconciliation of these results is shown on the 
face of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and in the tables opposite. Adjusted profit of £15.4m is derived from the statutory 
profit of £15.2m.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   107

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

107

22/08/2019   17:28:54

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

Underlying results are retranslated to current year exchange rates and therefore only prior year comparatives would be deemed an alternative 
performance measure. A reconciliation is provided below. 

Year ended 31 March 2018 (restated5)
Revenue
External customer
Foreign exchange retranslation

Underlying external sales

Adjusted operating profit/(loss)
Foreign exchange retranslation

Underlying adjusted operating profit/(loss) 

Chain2
£m 

Torque 
Transmission
£m

Head office 
costs and 
eliminations
£m 

Consolidated
£m 

153.1
(0.7)
152.4

14.7
(0.1)
14.6

38.5
(0.1)
38.4

4.3
0.1
4.4

–
–
–

(5.3)
–
(5.3)

191.6
(0.8)
190.8

13.7
–
13.7

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Inter-segment revenues are eliminated on consolidation.

 Included in Chain external sales is £4.2m (2018: £4.9m) of Torque Transmission product sold through the Chain NSCs, usually in countries where Torque 
Transmission does not have its own presence.

The measure of segment assets reviewed by the CODM is total working capital, defined as inventories and trade and other receivables, less trade and other 
payables. Working capital is also measured as a ratio of rolling annual sales.

Capital expenditure consists of additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTERNAL SALES BY DESTINATION, NON-CURRENT ASSET LOCATION AND AVERAGE EMPLOYEE NUMBERS

The UK is the home country of the parent company, Renold plc. The principal operating territories, the proportions of Group external revenue 
generated in each (customer location), external revenues, non-current assets (asset location) and average employee numbers in each are as follows:

United Kingdom
Rest of Europe
Americas
Australasia
China
India
Other countries

Revenue ratio
 2019 
%

7.4
30.4
41.2
9.6
4.1
4.1
3.1
100.0

 2018 
%

7.8
30.7
38.0
10.3
4.1
4.2
4.9
100.0

External revenues

Non-current assets

Employee numbers

2019 
£m

15.0
61.5
83.4
19.4
8.4
8.4
6.3
202.4

2018 
£m

15.0
58.9
72.8
19.7
7.9
8.0
9.3
191.6

2019
£m

12.5
18.9
31.1
2.7
14.1
5.1
0.8
85.2

2018
£m

13.5
19.0
30.1
2.8
5.7
5.0
1.1
77.2

 2019

321
558
328
125
339
392
35
2,098

 2018

355
557
323
128
258
379
49
2,049

All revenue relates to the sale of goods and services. No individual customer, or group of customers, represents more than 10% of Group 
revenue (2018: None).

Non-current assets consist of goodwill, other intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and investment property. Other non-current 
assets and deferred tax assets are not included above.

108

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   108

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:54

 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

2. Operating costs and adjusting items
(A) OPERATING PROFIT IS STATED AFTER CHARGING/(CREDITING):

Change in finished goods and work in progress
Raw materials and consumables
Other external charges
Employee costs
  Gross wages and salaries
  Social security costs
  Pension costs
  – defined benefit (Note 18)
  – defined contribution (Note 18)
  Share-based incentive plans

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 
  – owned assets
Amortisation of intangible assets
Operating leases
  – plant and machinery
  – property

Other operating income
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Research and development expenditure
Auditor’s remuneration (Note 2(b))
Trade receivables impairment
Foreign exchange
Operating costs before adjusting items

Adjusting items and restructuring costs (Note 2(c))
Pension administration costs 
Pension past service credit 
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill
Restructuring costs 
Adjusting items

Total operating costs

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

2019
£m

62.0
7.9

0.2
1.1
0.3

0.9
1.7

2019
£m

(4.4)
76.0
31.2

71.5

5.5
2.2

2.6
(0.3)
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.8
187.0

0.8
(4.4)
0.9
–
2.9
0.2
187.2

2018
(restated1)
£m

2018
(restated1)
£m

62.0
6.9

0.2
1.3
(0.2)

0.7
1.6

(0.2)
73.4
24.0

70.2

5.2
2.1

2.3
(0.1)
–
0.9
0.6
–
(0.5)
177.9

0.9
–
0.9
2.1
4.7
8.6
186.5

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   109

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

109

22/08/2019   17:28:54

 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

2. Operating costs and adjusting items continued
(B) AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

Audit of the Group’s annual financial statements
Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries

Total audit fees
Advisory services: Working capital report for AIM listing

Total non-audit fees
This is analysed in the following captions in the financial statements: 
Operating costs before adjusting items
Adjusting items

(C) ADJUSTING ITEMS

Accounting Policy

2019
£000

197
355
552
150
150

552
150
702

Items which individually or, if of a similar type, in aggregate, are material to an understanding of the Group’s financial performance are 
separately disclosed as an ‘adjusting item’ on the face of the income statement.

Included in operating costs
Step 2020 restructuring costs – China factory relocation
Step 2020 restructuring costs – other
AIM listing costs

Restructuring costs
Pension administration costs
Pension past service credit
Impairment of goodwill (Note 7)
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets (Note 8)

Adjusting items

Included in net financing costs
Discount unwind on onerous lease provision
Amortisation of financing costs on refinancing
Net IAS 19R financing costs

2019
£m

1.8
0.6
0.5
2.9
0.8
(4.4)
–
0.9
0.2

2019
£m

0.1
0.3
2.4
2.8

2018
£000

174
300
474
–
–

474
–
474

2018
£m

3.9
0.8
–
4.7
0.9
–
2.1
0.9
8.6

2018
£m

0.1
–
2.4
2.5

Various restructuring costs were incurred in the year as part of the Step 2020 Strategic Plan. A restructuring cost of £1.8m was incurred in the 
year as we continued a multi-year project to transfer the China Chain manufacturing facility from leased premises in Hangzhou to a purpose-
built facility near Changzhou in Jiangsu province. 

A further £0.6m was incurred in relation to other projects including European restructuring and the closure of our Singapore site. In addition, 
£0.5m has been provided for costs associated with transferring the company’s stock market listing to AIM.

Prior year restructuring costs included £3.9m for the multi-year project to transfer the China Chain manufacturing facility, other cost included 
the final restructuring costs associated with the European distribution and sales operations and the transfer of the HiTec Couplings business.

The pension past service credit of £4.4m for the UK pension scheme is the net impact of an £8.2m gain following the move of certain future 
pension increases from RPI to CPI, off-set by a £3.8m past service cost relating to GMP equalisation. The change in inflation measure to 
consumer prices index (CPI) rather than the retail prices index (RPI) applies to future increases of certain elements of the scheme where such a 
change is permitted. Following the High Court judgment in the year, the Group, along with many other pension scheme sponsors, is recognising 
an estimate of the future cost of GMP equalisation in the valuation of liabilities. 

110

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   110

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:54

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

2. Operating costs and adjusting items continued
(D) EMPLOYEES AND KEY MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION

Employee costs, including Directors, are set out in Note 2(a). Key management personnel are represented by the Board and their aggregate 
emoluments were as follows:

Statutory Directors’ remuneration
Share-based payment charge/(credit)
Social security costs

Total

2019
£000

942
216
105
 1,263

2018
£000

841
8
106
955

Further details of the remuneration of Directors are provided in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 66 to 82.

A geographical split of the Group’s average number of employees during the year is included in Note 1. The total number of employees employed 
by the Group at 31 March 2019 was 2,059 (2018: 2,044).

3. Net financing costs
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Borrowing costs are expensed in the period they occur and consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the 
borrowing of funds.

Financing costs:
Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts
Amortised financing costs
Amortisation of financing costs on refinancing

Loan financing costs
Net IAS 19R financing costs
Discount unwind on provisions

Net financing costs

2019
£m

(1.9)
(0.3)
(0.3)
(2.5)
(2.4)
(0.1)
(5.0)

2018
£m

(1.4)
(0.3)
–
(1.7)
(2.4)
(0.1)
(4.2)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   111

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

111

22/08/2019   17:28:54

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

4. Taxation
ACCOUNTING POLICY

The tax charge included in the income statement comprises current tax payable and deferred tax.

The Group is subject to taxes in numerous jurisdictions. The current tax charge represents an estimate of the amounts payable to tax 
authorities in respect of taxable profits. It is based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance 
sheet date.

Deferred income tax is provided using the liability method, providing for temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and 
liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. The amount of deferred tax provided is calculated using tax rates 
enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the 
temporary differences can be utilised or taxable profit will be available against which unused tax losses can be utilised before they expire.

Deferred income tax relating to items recognised directly in other comprehensive income is recognised in other comprehensive income and not 
the income statement. Similarly, income tax is charged or credited to equity if it relates to items that are credited or charged directly to equity. 
Otherwise, income tax is recognised in the income statement.

Deferred tax balances are analysed in Note 17.

ANALYSIS OF TAX CHARGE IN THE YEAR

United Kingdom 
UK corporation tax at 19% (2018: 19%)

Overseas taxes 
Corporation taxes
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
Withholding taxes
Current income tax charge

Deferred tax 
UK – origination and reversal of temporary differences
Overseas – origination and reversal of temporary differences
Effect of changes in corporate tax rates
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
Total deferred tax charge

Tax charge on profit on ordinary activities

Tax on items taken to other comprehensive income 
Deferred tax on changes in net pension deficits

Tax (credit)/charge in the statement of other comprehensive income

FACTORS AFFECTING THE GROUP TAX CHARGE FOR THE YEAR

2019
£m

–

1.6
(0.6)
0.1
1.1

1.0
1.8
–
(0.4)
2.4
3.5

2019
£m

(2.1)
(2.1)

2018
£m

–

1.0
–
0.1
1.1

0.2
–
2.4
(0.1)
2.5
3.6

2018
£m

1.6
1.6

The current year UK deferred tax charge relates to pensions with the charge arising on the net of the past service credit, interest charges, and 
cash contributions. Overseas deferred tax relates to the utilisation of recognised deferred tax assets. The increase in overseas current corporate 
tax relates to jurisdictions where historical tax losses have now been fully utilised.

The US Government has enacted substantial tax reforms during the prior year. The impact on our US operations was to reduce the value of 
deferred tax assets and liabilities in relation to the reduced tax rate, and to increase the restrictions on interest deductibility which led to 
the derecognition of the related deferred tax asset given the current capital structure of our US operations. Accordingly, the US deferred tax 
balances were reduced by £2.4m. 

The Group’s tax charge in future years will be affected by the profit mix, effective tax rates in the different countries where the Group operates 
and utilisation of tax losses. No deferred tax is recognised on the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries in accordance with IAS 12.39.

112

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   112

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:54

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

4. Taxation continued

The actual tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount using the UK corporation tax rate as follows:

Profit on ordinary activities before tax
Theoretical tax charge at 19% (2018: 19%)
Effects of:
Permanent differences
Overseas tax rate differences
Effect of changes in corporate tax rates
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
Movement in unrecognised deferred tax

Total tax charge

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

EFFECTIVE TAX RATE

2019
£m

10.2
1.9

0.3
0.7
–
(1.0)
1.6
3.5

2018
(restated1)
£m

0.9
0.2

(0.3)
0.3
2.4
(0.1)
1.1
3.6

The effective tax rate of 31% (2018: 225%) is higher than the UK tax rate of 19% (2018: 19%) due to the following factors:

 •
 •
 •
 •

Losses in jurisdictions where, due to uncertain future profitability, deferred tax assets are not recognised;

Permanent differences including items that are disallowed from a tax perspective such as entertaining and certain employee costs;

Prior year adjustments arising as tax submissions are finalised and agreed in specific jurisdictions; and

Differences in overseas tax rates, typically being higher than the rates in the UK.

TAX PAYMENTS

Cash tax paid in the year of £1.8m (2018: £3.8m) is higher than the current tax charge as payments on account exceeded the calculated liabilities 
for the year.

5. Earnings per share
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by reference to the earnings for the year and the weighted average number of shares in issue during the 
year as follows:

2019

2018 (restated1)

Earnings
£m

Shares 
(thousands)

Per share 
amount 
(pence)

Earnings
£m

Shares 
(thousands)

Per share 
amount 
(pence)

Basic EPS
Profit attributed to ordinary shareholders

Basic EPS

6.5
6.5

225,418
225,418

2.9
2.9

(2.8)
(2.8)

225,418
225,418

(1.2)
(1.2)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   113

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

113

22/08/2019   17:28:54

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

5. Earnings per share continued

Adjusted EPS
Basic EPS
Effect of adjusting items, after tax:
Restructuring costs in operating costs
Pension administration costs included in 
operating costs
Pension past service cost
Refinancing costs
Discount unwind on restructuring costs
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill
US tax reform
Net pension financing costs

Adjusted EPS

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

2019

2018

Earnings
£m

Shares 
(thousands)

 6.5 

225,418

2.9

0.7
(3.6)
0.3
–
0.6
–
–
2.7
10.1

225,418

Per share 
amount 
(pence)

Earnings
£m

Shares 
(thousands)

Per share 
amount 
(pence)

 2.9 

1.3

0.3
(1.6)
0.1
–
0.3
–
–
1.2
4.5

(2.8)

225,418

(1.2)

4.6

0.8
–
–
0.1
0.6
1.7
2.4
2.2
9.6

225,418

2.0

0.4
–
–
–
0.3
0.8
1.0
1.0
4.3

Inclusion of the dilutive securities, comprising 7,820,809 (2018: 4,367,312) additional shares due to share options, in the calculation of basic and 
adjusted EPS changes the amounts shown above to 2.8p and 4.3p respectively (2018: basic EPS (1.2)p, adjusted EPS 4.2p).

The adjusted EPS numbers have been provided in order to give a useful indication of underlying performance by the exclusion of adjusting 
items. Due to the existence of unrecognised deferred tax assets there were no associated tax credits on some of the adjusting items and in these 
instances adjusting items are added back in full.

6. Dividends
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Dividend distributions to the Company’s shareholders are recognised as a liability in the Group’s financial statements in the period in which the 
dividends are paid or approved by the Company’s shareholders.

No ordinary dividend payments were paid or proposed in either the current or prior year.

7. Goodwill
ACCOUNTING POLICY

(i) Initial recognition

Goodwill arises on business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the Group’s share of the identifiable 
net assets of the acquiree at the acquisition date. Where the cost is less than the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets, the difference is 
immediately recognised in the income statement as a gain from a bargain purchase.

Goodwill arising on acquisitions before the date of transition to IFRS has been retained at the previous UK GAAP amounts subject to being 
tested for impairment at that date.

(ii) Subsequent measurement

Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. In respect of equity accounted investments, goodwill acquired directly is 
included in the carrying amount of the investment.

(iii) Impairment

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash 
generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The cash generating unit to which the goodwill has been allocated is the smallest 
identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets. 
Any impairment charge is recognised immediately in the income statement.

114

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   114

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:54

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

7. Goodwill continued

Cost
At 1 April 2017
Exchange adjustment

At 1 April 2018
Exchange adjustment

At 31 March 2019

Accumulated amortisation and impairment
At 1 April 2017
Impairment charge
Exchange adjustment

At 1 April 2018
Exchange adjustment

At 31 March 2019
Net book amount at 31 March 2019
Net book amount at 31 March 2018
Net book amount at 31 March 2017

Goodwill
£m

27.8
(2.8)
25.0
1.6

26.6

1.4
2.1
(0.1)
3.4
0.1

3.5
23.1
21.6
26.4

The Group performed its annual impairment test of goodwill at 31 March 2019 which compares the current book value to the recoverable 
amount from the continued use or sale of the related business.

No impairment charge has been recognised in the period for any Cash Generating Unit (CGU).

The recoverable amount of each CGU has been determined on a value-in-use basis. Value-in-use is calculated as the net present value of cash 
flows derived from detailed financial plans for the next two financial years as approved by the Board. Cash flows beyond this are extrapolated 
using the long-term country growth rates disclosed below:

Jeffrey Chain, USA
Ace Chains, Australia
Renold Chain, India
Renold Tooth Chain, Germany

Growth rates
2019 
%

1.4
2.6
7.7
1.2

2018 
%

1.4
2.8
8.1
1.2

CGU discount rates

2019 
%

17.0
16.9
27.7
15.6

2018 
%

14.9
11.6
25.0
15.5

Carrying values
2019 
£m

20.2
0.5
1.9
0.5
23.1

2018 
£m

18.7
0.5
1.9
0.5
21.6

KEY ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE VALUE IN USE CALCULATIONS:

Sales volumes, selling prices and cost changes

The Group prepares cash flow forecasts based on the latest management estimates for the next two financial years. The expected sales prices 
and volumes reflect management’s experience of how sales will develop at this point of the economic cycle. The expected profit margin reflects 
management’s experience of each CGUs profitability at the forecast level of sales and incorporates the impact of any restructuring that took 
place during the year ended 31 March 2019.

Cash flows beyond the period of projections are extrapolated using long-term growth rates published by the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development for the territory in which the CGU is based. The discount rates applied to the cash flows of each of the CGUs are 
based on the risk free rate for long-term bonds issued by the government in the respective market. This is then adjusted to reflect both the 
increased risk of investing in equities and the systematic risk of the specific CGU (using an average of the betas of comparable companies).

Management believe that no reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions would cause the recoverable amount of any CGU to fall 
below the relevant carrying values.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   115

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

115

22/08/2019   17:28:54

 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

8. Intangible assets
ACCOUNTING POLICY

(i) Computer software

Computer software that is not integral to an item of plant and equipment is recognised separately as an intangible asset. Amortisation is 
charged on a straight-line basis so as to charge the cost of software to the income statement over its expected useful life which is between 
three and seven years. Costs associated with maintaining computer software programs are recognised as an expense as incurred.

(ii) Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets, such as those identified on acquisition by the Group that have finite useful lives, are recognised at fair value and 
measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. The estimated useful lives for the Group’s finite life intangible assets 
are between one and seven years.

Intangible assets are reviewed, at least annually, to ensure that assets are not carried above their recoverable amounts. Where some indication 
of impairment exists, calculations are made of the discounted cash flows resulting from continued use of the assets (value in use) or from their 
disposal (fair value less costs to sell). Where these values are less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is charged to the 
income statement.

Cost
At 1 April 2017
Exchange adjustment
Additions
Disposals

At 31 March 2018
Exchange adjustment
Additions

At 31 March 2019

Accumulated amortisation and impairment
At 1 April 2017
Exchange adjustment
Amortisation charge
Disposals

At 31 March 2018
Exchange adjustment
Amortisation charge

At 31 March 2019
Net book amount at 31 March 2019
Net book amount at 31 March 2018
Net book amount at 31 March 2017

Customer 
orderbook
£m

Customer 
lists 
£m

Technical 
know-how
£m

Computer 
software
£m

0.3 
–
–
–
0.3 
–
–

0.3 

0.3 
–
–
–
0.3 
–
–

0.3 
–
–
–

4.0 
0.2 
–
–
4.2 
–
–

4.2 

1.0 
–
0.8 
–
1.8 
0.1
0.8 

2.7
1.5
2.4
3.0

0.2 
–
–
–
0.2 
–
–

0.2 

–
–
0.1 
–
0.1 
–
0.1 

0.2
–
0.1
0.2

15.0 
(0.2)
1.4 
(0.3)
15.9 
(0.2)
1.5

17.2 

8.5 
(0.2)
2.1 
(0.3)
10.1 
(0.2)
2.2

12.1
5.1
5.8
6.5

Total
£m

19.5 
–
1.4 
(0.3)
20.6 
(0.2)
1.5 

21.9

9.8 
(0.2)
3.0 
(0.3)
12.3 
(0.1)
3.1

15.3
6.6
8.3
9.7

The acquisition of the Tooth Chain business in January 2016 brought significant benefit to the Group in terms of new customers, relationships 
and technical ‘know-how’. These benefits have been valued under IFRS 3 using estimates of useful lives and discounted cash flows of expected 
income. The values are being amortised as follows:

CUSTOMER ORDERBOOK

Customer orderbook is amortised when the orderbook at the date of acquisition has been fulfilled. This is now fully amortised.

CUSTOMER LISTS AND TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW

Customer lists and technical know-how is being amortised over five years as the benefits are likely to crystallise over a longer period.

No brand names were acquired as part of the acquisition.

116

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   116

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:54

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

9. Property, plant and equipment
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Tangible assets are stated at cost, being purchase cost plus any incidental costs of acquisition, less accumulated depreciation and impairment.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis so as to charge the depreciable amount of the respective assets to the income statement over 
their expected useful lives. No depreciation has been charged on freehold land. The useful lives of assets are as follows:

Freehold buildings

Leasehold properties
General plant and equipment
Fixtures
Precision cutting and grinding machines
Motor vehicles

Years
50
50 years or the period  
of the lease if less
15
15
10
3

Useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually and where adjustments are required these are made prospectively. Where the carrying 
amount of an asset is greater than its estimated recoverable amount, it is written down immediately to its recoverable amount.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amounts and are included in operating profit.

Cost
At 1 April 2017 (restated1)
Exchange adjustment
Additions
Disposals
At 31 March 2018 (restated1)
Exchange adjustment
Additions
Disposals

At 31 March 2019

Accumulated depreciation and impairment
At 1 April 2017
Exchange adjustment
Charge for the year
Disposals

At 31 March 2018
Exchange adjustment
Charge for the year
Disposals

At 31 March 2018
Net book amount at 31 March 2019
Net book amount at 31 March 2018 (restated1)
Net book amount at 31 March 2017 (restated1)

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Land and 
buildings 
£m

Plant and 
equipment
£m

18.1
(0.3)
2.8 
–
20.6 
0.7 
3.9 
–

25.2 

3.5
0.3 
0.3 
–
4.1 
0.1 
0.4 
–

4.6 
20.6 
16.5 
14.6

116.3
(3.8)
5.3 
(4.6)
113.2 
0.7 
9.9 
(3.9)

119.9 

84.1
(2.2)
4.9 
(4.4)
82.4 
0.5 
5.1 
(3.0)

85.0 
34.9 
30.8 
32.2

Total
£m

134.4
(4.1)
8.1 
(4.6)
133.8 
1.4 
13.8 
(3.9)

145.1

87.6
(1.9)
5.2 
(4.4)
86.5 
0.6 
5.5 
(3.0)

89.6 
55.5 
47.3 
46.8

Property, plant and equipment pledged as security for liabilities amounted to £36.2m (2018: £34.4m).

FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

At 31 March 2019 capital expenditure contracted for but not provided for in these accounts amounted to £2.2m (2018: £2.7m).

ASSET HELD FOR SALE

In the prior year the former HiTec Couplings manufacturing site located in Halifax, UK was sold for net proceeds of £0.5m realising a gain of 
£0.2m. This site was formerly classed as an asset held for sale (see Note 10).

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   117

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

117

22/08/2019   17:28:54

 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

10. Asset Held for Sale
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying value is to be recovered by sale rather than by continuing use in the business and where 
the sale is highly probable. Their value in the balance sheet is measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

At 1 April
Disposal

At 31 March 

2019
£m

–
– 
–

2018
£m

0.3
(0.3)
–

During the previous year, the HiTec Couplings’ Halifax site was sold for net proceeds of £0.5m realising a gain of £0.2m.

11. Inventories
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Inventories are stated at the lower of their cost and net realisable value after making due allowance for obsolete and slow-moving stocks. Cost 
includes all direct expenditure and attributable overhead expenditure incurred in bringing goods to their current state. Net realisable value is 
the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make 
the sale. In the Group accounts, unrealised profit on sales within the Group is deducted from inventories.

Raw materials
Work in progress
Finished products and production tooling

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Inventories pledged as security for liabilities amounted to £35.7m (2018: £32.8m).

12. Trade and other receivables
ACCOUNTING POLICY

2019
£m

 6.4 
 5.4 
32.5
44.3

2018
(restated1) 
£m

8.1
4.8
27.9
40.8

Trade and other receivables are recognised and carried at their original invoice amount less an allowance for expected credit losses. 
Expected credit losses are calculated as the difference between the amount contractually owed to the Group and the cash flows which the 
Group expect to receive. A provision matrix is used to calculate expected credit losses at the end of the reporting date which groups trade 
and other receivables based on their attributes, principally geographical region. The adoption of IFRS 9 has had no material impact on the 
opening loss allowance.

Trade receivables1
Less: impairment provision
Trade receivables: net
Other receivables1
Prepayments

1 

2 

Financial assets carried at amortised cost.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

2019 
Current 
£m

32.0
(0.5)
31.5
3.8
2.2
37.5

2018 
Current
(restated2) 
£m

30.8
(0.5)
30.3
3.3
2.5
36.1

The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk but does have a concentration of translational and transactional foreign exchange risk 
in both US Dollars and Euros, however, the Group hedges against these risks.

118

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   118

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

12. Trade and other receivables continued
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30–90 days terms. See Note 25(d) for the Group’s credit risk policy. As at 
31 March, the ageing analysis of trade receivables is as follows:

Total
(not impaired)
£m

31.5
30.3

Neither past 
due nor 
impaired 
£m

24.7
24.8

Past due but not impaired

<30 days
£m

30–60 days
£m

60–90 days
£m

>90 days
£m

4.9
3.5

1.0
0.8

0.4
0.3

2019
£m

0.5
0.3
(0.3)
0.5

0.5
0.9

2018
(restated1) 
£m

0.3
0.2
–
0.5

2019
2018 (restated1)

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

Movement on impairment provision
Opening provision
Net charge to income statement
Utilised in year through assets written off
Closing provision

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

13. Cash and cash equivalents
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Cash and cash equivalents are carried in the balance sheet at cost. For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents 
comprise cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or 
less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are included within borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.

In the Group cash flow statement, net cash and cash equivalents are shown after deducting bank overdrafts as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents
Less: Overdrafts (Note 14)
Net cash and cash equivalents

14. Borrowings

Amounts falling due within one year:
Overdrafts (Note 13)
Capitalised costs

Amounts falling due after more than one year:
Bank loans 
Capitalised costs
Preference stock

Total borrowings (Note 25(d))

All financial liabilities above are carried at amortised cost.

2019
£m
17.6
(0.2)
17.4

2019
£m

0.2
(0.2)
–

48.1
(0.7)
0.5
47.9
47.9

2018
£m
13.9
(1.6)
12.3

2018
£m

1.6
(0.3)
1.3

36.7
(0.3)
0.5
36.9
38.2

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   119

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

119

22/08/2019   17:28:55

 
 
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

14. Borrowings continued
CORE BANKING FACILITIES

On 29 March 2019 the Group renewed its £61.5m Multi-Currency Revolving Facility banking facilities with HSBC UK, Allied Irish Bank (GB), and 
Citibank. The facility matures in March 2024 and is fully committed and available until maturity.

At the year end, the undrawn core banking facility was £12.5m (2018: £23.0m). The Group pays interest at LIBOR plus a variable margin in 
respect of this facility. The average rate of interest paid in the year was LIBOR plus 1.95% for Sterling, Euro and US Dollar denominated facilities 
(2018: LIBOR plus 1.94% for Sterling denominated facility and LIBOR plus 1.84% for the Euro and US Dollar denominated facility). This facility 
has two primary financial covenants which are tested on a six monthly basis. The first is net debt as a ratio of rolling annual EBITDA with a 
maximum ratio of 2.5 times. The second is interest cover with a minimum ratio of 4.0 times (rolling annual EBITDA divided by net financial 
interest cost). The Group also benefits from a number of overseas facilities totalling £1.4m (2018: £2.0m) with availability at year end of £1.3m.

SECURED BORROWINGS

Included in Group borrowings are secured borrowings of £47.5m (2018: £36.1m). Security is provided by fixed and floating charges over assets 
(including certain property, plant and equipment and inventory) primarily in the UK, USA, France, Germany and Australia. Certain group 
companies have provided cross-guarantees in respect of these borrowings. 

PREFERENCE STOCK

At 31 March 2019, there were 580,482 units of Preference Stock in issue (2018: 580,482).

All payments of dividends on the Preference Stock have been paid on the due dates. The Preference Stock has the following rights:

i.  a fixed cumulative preferential dividend at the rate of 6% per annum payable half yearly on 1 January and 1 July in each year;

ii. 

 rank both with regard to dividend (including any arrears on the commencement of a winding up) and return of capital in priority to all other 
stock or shares in the Company, but with no further right to participate in profits or assets;

iii.   no right to attend or vote, either in person or by proxy, at any general meeting of the Company or to have notice of any such meeting, unless 

the dividend on the Preference Stock is in arrears for six calendar months; and

iv.  no redemption entitlement and no fixed repayment date.

There is no significant difference between the carrying value of financial liabilities and their equivalent fair value.

15. Trade and other payables

Trade payables
Other tax and social security
Other payables
Accruals

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

2019 
Current 
£m

2019 
Non-current 
£m

2018 
Current 
(restated1) 
£m

2018 
Non-current 
(restated1) 
£m

22.6
2.9
1.0
15.6
42.1

–
–
5.1
0.3
5.4

21.2
1.9
0.9
16.2
40.2

–
–
–
0.3
0.3

Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled within 60 day terms. The Group does have a concentration of translational 
foreign exchange risk in both US Dollars and Euros, however, the Group hedges against this risk. The non-current other payables is the deferred 
element of the construction costs for the new Chinese factory in Jintan.

120

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   120

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

16. Provisions
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Provisions are recognised when the Group: (i) has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; (ii) it is more likely than 
not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (iii) a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. Where the 
Group expects a provision to be reimbursed, e.g. under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset but only 
when the reimbursement is virtually certain.

Costs related to ongoing activities of the Group are not provided in advance.

At 1 April 2018
Exchange
Arising during the year
Utilised in the year
Discount unwind on provision

At 31 March 2019

Allocated as:

Current provisions
Non-current provisions

BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING

Business 
restructuring 
£m

Onerous 
lease 
£m

Contingent 
consideration 
£m

Total 
provisions 
£m

3.2
–
–
(3.1)
–

0.1

4.0
(0.1)
–
(0.8)
0.1

3.2

0.7
0.1
–
(0.8)
–

–

2019
£m

0.8
2.5
3.3

7.9
–
–
(4.7)
0.1

3.3

2018
£m

4.6
3.3
7.9

At 31 March 2018, a provision of £3.1m was made against costs to be incurred as part of the closure and relocation of our Chinese Chain 
manufacturing facility. See Note 2(c) on adjusting items and restructuring costs for more details.

At 31 March 2019, a provision of £0.1m has been made for site closure and clean up costs.

Restructuring provisions are expected to be utilised within 12 months.

ONEROUS LEASE

This provision relates to onerous lease costs in respect of the lease of the Bredbury plant in the UK and the Mulgrave facility in Australia. 
The Bredbury lease expires in May 2030. In August 2016, it was agreed to sublet a significant part of the property for a five-year term for 
an annual rent of £0.6m. £0.3m of the provision was utilised in the year (2018: £0.2m) leaving a provision of £2.7m in respect of this lease 
(2018: £3.0m).

In addition, as part of the sale agreement of the Mulgrave facility in Australia completed in March 2017, it was agreed that the business could 
remain in the property for a maximum of three additional years for an annual rent of £0.5m. This lease was deemed to be onerous and as a 
result a provision was established in relation to the total lease cost of £1.6m. Costs of £0.5m were incurred in the year offset by exchange of 
£0.1m, resulting in a provision at 31 March 2019 of £0.5m.

CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION

Renold (Hangzhou) Co Limited, China

The provision for the purchase of the minority shareholding in Renold (Hangzhou) Co Limited was utilised in the period ended 31 March 2019.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   121

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

121

22/08/2019   17:28:55

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

17. Deferred tax
ACCOUNTING POLICY

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer 
probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised within the foreseeable 
future (assessed to be 3 years). Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the 
extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current income tax assets 
against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable authority and taxable entity, or where deferred 
tax relates to different taxable entities, the tax authority permits the Group to make a single net payment.

Accelerated capital allowances
Pension plans
Tax losses
Other temporary differences
Tax assets/(liabilities)
Net off (liabilities)/assets

Net deferred tax assets

Assets

Liabilities

Net

2019
£m

–
16.6
2.4
2.5
21.5
–
21.5

2018
£m

–
15.7
2.9
2.0
20.6
–
20.6

2019
£m

(1.5)
–
–
(4.1)
(5.6)
–
(5.6)

2018
£m

(1.5)
–
–
(2.7)
(4.2)
–
(4.2)

2019
£m

(1.5)
16.6
2.4
(1.6)
15.9
–
15.9

The net deferred tax asset recoverable within one year is £1.7m (2018: £1.0m) and recoverable after more than one year is £14.2m 
(2018: £15.4m).

The movement in the net deferred tax balance relating to assets is as follows:

2019
Accelerated capital allowances
Pension plans
Tax losses
Other temporary differences

2018
Accelerated capital allowances
Pension plans
Tax losses
Other temporary differences

Opening
balance 
£m

Exchange 
adjustments 
£m

Recognised 
directly 
in other 
comprehensive 
income
£m

Recognised 
in income 
statement
£m

(1.5)
15.7
2.9
(0.7)
16.4

(0.1)
–
0.2
(0.3)
(0.2)

0.1
(1.2)
(0.7)
(0.6)
(2.4)

–
2.1
–
–
2.1

Opening
balance 
£m
(2.7)
17.2
5.3
0.8
20.6

Exchange 
adjustments 
£m
0.2
–
(0.4)
0.1
(0.1)

Recognised 
directly 
in other 
comprehensive 
income
£m
–
(1.5)
–
(0.1)
(1.6)

Recognised 
in income 
statement
£m
1.0
–
(2.0)
(1.5)
(2.5)

2018
£m

(1.5)
15.7
2.9
(0.7)
16.4
–
16.4

Closing 
balance
£m 

(1.5)
16.6
2.4
(1.6)
15.9

Closing 
balance
£m 
(1.5)
15.7
2.9
(0.7)
16.4

During the year the Group has reported an adjusted operating profit of £15.4m (2018: £13.7m). The businesses in all jurisdictions where deferred 
tax assets have been recognised will, more likely than not, generate suitable profits based on approved management forecasts from which the 
future reversal of the underlying timing differences can be deducted.

Unrecognised deferred tax assets amount to £20.8m (2018: £24.8m) arising from unrecognised losses of £14.9m (2018: £15.5m) (representing 
gross losses of £57.2m (2018: £53.4m)) and other temporary differences of £5.9m (2018: £9.3m). Based on available evidence, it is considered 
unlikely that these amounts will be recovered within the foreseeable future. The significant majority of these losses are not subject to time limits.

122

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   122

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

18. Pensions
ACCOUNTING POLICY

The Group operates a number of defined benefit plans around the world. The costs are calculated by independent actuaries using the projected 
unit credit method. Any past service costs resulting from enhanced benefits are recognised immediately in the income statement as an 
operating cost. Administration costs, including the Pensions Protection Levy, are charged to operating costs. However, plan asset management 
costs are included in the actual return on plan assets. 

Remeasurement gains and losses, comprising actuarial gains and losses, and the return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net 
interest), are recognised in other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Actuarial gains and losses arise when actual results 
differ from the assessment outcomes which are used to calculate defined benefit assets and liabilities at a particular point in time.

The defined benefit liability or asset recognised in the balance sheet represents the net total for each plan of the present value of the  
benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of plan assets (for funded schemes) at the balance sheet date. If a plan is in 
surplus, the asset recognised is limited to the value of any amount expected to be recoverable by the Group by way of refunds or reduction  
in future contributions.

Under the Group’s UK pension scheme rules, any surplus arising on payment of agreed contributions is fully recoverable.

For defined contribution plans, the Group’s contributions are charged to the income statement in the period in which they fall due. Once the 
contributions have been paid, the Group has no further payment obligation.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

In a defined benefit plan the members are guaranteed a certain level of benefits that depend on a number of factors such as service, salary 
and inflation. Defined benefit plans can be supported by an asset fund that will be used to pay member benefits or can be unfunded, in which 
case obligations to members are paid by the sponsoring employer as they fall due. In a defined benefit plan, because the level and duration 
of the members’ benefits are uncertain, the risk of any increase or decrease in the cost of providing those benefits stays with the employer. 
This contrasts with a defined contribution plan where the employer’s only obligation is to pay the amount agreed in the employment contract 
into a pension plan.

Any change in the total expected cost of providing defined benefits can produce either funding shortfalls or surpluses. In the case of an expected 
funding shortfall, the Company is usually required to agree a deficit recovery plan which can vary from country to country. This is usually in 
the form of additional contributions to make good the shortfall over an agreed period of time (sometimes referred to as a funding plan or a 
minimum funding requirement) and can also include an allowance for future asset returns. In the case of a surplus, mechanisms are available 
in all of the Renold schemes to return that surplus to, or utilise it for the benefit of, the Group. 

UK PENSION PLANS

The principal UK fund is the Renold Pension Scheme (RPS). The RPS was formed in June 2013 by the merger of three predecessor plans, all 
of which were already closed to future accrual and to new members. The RPS is a funded defined benefit plan with assets held in separate 
administered funds.

The Trustees are chaired by an independent professional trustee firm and have access to a range of professional advisers. The Trustee Board is 
required to consult the Company in matters such as investment policy and to obtain agreement to any amendments to benefits. The Company 
can make proposals to the Trustees on a range of issues but cannot insist on their adoption. The majority of Trustees are either independent or 
member nominated with Company nominated Trustees being in the minority. To mitigate the risk of potential conflicts of interests, no Directors 
of Renold plc are Trustees of the RPS.

The RPS is underpinned by a 25-year asset-backed partnership structure (the Scottish Limited Partnership ‘SLP’). The partnership holds an 
intercompany loan from Renold International Holdings Limited, the holding company for most of the Group’s overseas trading companies. 
The capital rights to the assets in the SLP belong to Renold plc except in the event of a corporate insolvency of the pension scheme sponsor 
(Renold plc). The income rights in the SLP belong to the RPS. The loan generates interest income that provided a cash contribution of £3.0m 
to the pension fund in the current year, with annual increases linked to RPI plus 1.5% and capped at 5%. The income stream is used to fund 
deficit repair payments and the first £0.5m of annual administrative expenses (with the Company bearing the excess, if any arises). In the event 
that the RPS becomes fully funded on a buyout basis, the income stream will instead accrue to Renold plc. The SLP was put in place with the 
expectation that the period to recover the funding shortfall was 25 years from the time of merger in June 2013. The SLP therefore helps reduce 
the volatility in short-term cash funding by following an agreed payment plan over a longer period of time. The interest in the SLP held by the 
RPS is not reported as a plan asset in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as it is a non-transferable interest issued by the Group.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   123

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

123

22/08/2019   17:28:55

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

18. Pensions continued
This arrangement replaced all other existing funding arrangements for the RPS. The SLP therefore represents the entirety of the committed 
cash element of the funding plan for the RPS. The funding plan also assumes an allowance for asset outperformance of 1.0% (that is, assets are 
expected to return an amount of 1.0% more than the discount rate applied to the liabilities). Separately to the SLP but put in place at the same 
time, the Group has also agreed that if adjusted operating profits reach £16.0m in any year following the year ended 31 March 2017, additional 
annual contributions of £1.0m will become payable (monthly in arrears) while profits remain above this level. Prior to the SLP, the contributions 
had been at a higher level. However, the Trustees agreed to lower contributions for longer under the SLP. The £1.0m increase matches the 
approximate £1.0m reduction agreed when the SLP was established. Finally, as part of the overall agreement, Renold plc is not constrained from 
paying a dividend, other than by normal legal considerations. Renold has agreed to make additional contributions equal to 25% of the value of 
any dividend paid in order to accelerate the deficit recovery plan. The deficit will be reduced as the cash contributions under the scheme are 
made, enhanced or offset by actual performance compared to asset returns and actuarial assumptions.

Following the implementation of the two medically underwritten insured buy-ins that fully de-risked approximately 25% of current pensioner 
liabilities implemented in the year ended 31 March 2016, the growth assets of the RPS represented over 90% of the remaining invested assets of 
the scheme. The investment strategy adopted by the Trustees (with the agreement of the Company) includes growth assets, protection assets, 
plus multi-asset credit (MAC) and liability-driven investments (LDI) in the portfolio. 

Total cash costs for UK deficit repair payments and UK administrative expenses in the period were £3.5m (2018: £3.3m). The current year figure 
includes the £3.0m noted above in connection with the SLP, and a further £0.5m in respect of pension administration costs. 

The past service credit for the UK pension scheme is the net impact of an £8.2m gain following the move of certain future pension increases 
from RPI to CPI, off-set by a £3.8m past service cost relating to GMP equalisation. The change in inflation measure to consumer prices index 
(CPI) rather than the retail prices index (RPI) applies to future increases of certain elements of the scheme where such a change is permitted. 
Following the High Court judgment in the year, the Group, along with many other pension scheme sponsors, is recognising an estimate of the 
future cost of GMP equalisation in the valuation of liabilities. 

The latest triennial actuarial valuation of the RPS, with an effective date of 5 April 2016, concluded that contributions to the scheme should 
continue unchanged and no additional contributions in excess of the previously agreed asset backed funding structure were deemed necessary. 
The next triennial valuation date will be 5 April 2019.

OVERSEAS PENSION PLANS

Germany

In Germany, in addition to participating in the state backed pension scheme, the Group operates an unfunded defined benefit scheme (no other 
Group company operates such a scheme). ‘Unfunded’ means that the scheme has no asset backing to pay benefits and instead the Group pays 
member benefits as they fall due. The scheme closed to new members on 1 April 1992. A German court confirmed that the pension scheme was 
properly closed to future accrual with effect from 31 March 2014. Following the acquisition of the Tooth Chain business in 2016, the unfunded 
defined benefit scheme operated by that business transferred to our German subsidiary. 

In aggregate, the two (2018: two) German pension schemes have a net liability of £25.5m (2018: £24.9m). The increase in the net deficit is due to 
actuarial losses exceeding the benefits paid by the company, off-set by the positive impact of the change in the Euro foreign exchange rate.

United States of America

The Group operates two defined benefit pension schemes in the US Torque Transmission business. The schemes are both closed to new 
members and one is also closed to future accrual. Funds are being used to accelerate the deficit reduction in the fully closed US scheme with the 
intention to terminate and secure member benefits as soon as this is cost-effective. 

The US Chain business operates a defined contribution scheme.

In aggregate, the two (2018: two) defined benefit schemes in the US have combined assets of £11.1m (2018: £10.4m) and liabilities of £13.9m 
(2018: £12.9m), giving a net deficit of £2.8m (2018: £2.5m). The increase in the net deficit was due to actuarial losses.

124

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   124

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

18. Pensions continued

OTHER OVERSEAS SCHEMES

In aggregate, the other overseas defined benefit schemes have combined assets of £2.6m (2018: £2.7m) and liabilities of £3.4m (2018: £3.1m) 
giving a net deficit of £0.8m (2018: net deficit of £0.4m).

Other overseas employees participate in a variety of different pension arrangements of the defined contribution or defined benefit type, funded 
in accordance with local practice.

The pension disclosures in the financial statements are based on the most recent actuarial valuations. Where material, these have been updated 
to the balance sheet date by qualified independent actuaries. The disclosures provided are presented on a weighted average basis where 
appropriate. Plan assets are stated at their market values at the respective balance sheet dates.

The weighted average durations for the UK pension scheme is 15 years (2018: 15 years) and 14 years (2018: 14 years) for the German schemes. 
They can therefore be regarded as mature schemes.

SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

The principal financial assumptions used to calculate plan liabilities as at 31 March 2019 are presented below. The assumptions adopted 
represent the best estimates chosen from a range of possible actuarial assumptions which, due to the timescale covered, may not necessarily be 
borne out in practice. The present values of the plans’ liabilities are derived from cash flow projections over long periods and are thus inherently 
uncertain.

Rate of increase in pensionable salaries1
Rate of increase in pensions in payment and 
deferred pensions
Discount rate
Inflation assumption2

UK

Germany

2019

–

1.7%
2.4%
2.4%

2018

–

1.9%
2.6%
2.2%

2019

–

1.5%
1.5%
1.5%

2018

–

1.5%
2.0%
1.5%

Other Overseas
2019

3.2%

–
2.6%
2.2%

2018

2.0%

–
3.8%
2.0%

1 

2 

No increase applies following the closure of the UK and German defined benefit pension schemes to future accrual.

The inflation assumption used for UK schemes is based on CPI (2018: blended RPI and CPI rate).

The predominant defined benefit obligation for funded plans within the Group resides in the UK (£211.2m of the £228.5m Group obligation for 
funded plans). In addition to the assumptions shown previously, mortality assumptions have a significant bearing on the calculated obligation. 
The assumed life expectancy for the RPS members on retirement at age 65 is as follows:

Males
Currently aged 45
Currently aged 65

Females
Currently aged 45
Currently aged 65

2019

21.4
20.4

23.9
22.7

2018

21.5
20.4

23.6
22.3

The post-retirement mortality tables used for the UK plan are the S3PA series tables published by the UK actuarial profession with a 17.5% uplift 
in mortality reflecting scheme-specific experience (2018: S2PA series with a 20% uplift in mortality). Historically, the RPS experiences mortality 
in excess of the national average. The mortality rates for the RPS are based on average year of birth for both non-pensioners and pensioners 
with an allowance for future annual improvements in life expectancy.

In Germany and the United States, the mortality expectations for the scheme are in line with the national averages. 

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON UK SCHEME:

Assumption
Discount rate
Rate of inflation
Rate of mortality

Change in assumption
Increase/decrease by 0.5%
Increase/decrease by 0.5%
Decrease/increase by 1 year1

Impact on plan liabilities
Decrease by £14.7m/increase by £16.5m
Increase by £13.3m/decrease by £10.8m
Increase by £9.8m/decrease by £9.7m

1 

This is broadly equivalent to a change in life expectancy of one year at age 65.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   125

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

125

22/08/2019   17:28:55

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

18. Pensions continued
The market values of assets of the principal defined benefit plans of the Group, together with the present value of plan liabilities, are shown below. 
It should be noted that the market values of the plans’ assets are stated as at the Group’s year end and since it is not intended to realise the 
assets in the short-term, the value may change significantly before being realised.

The fair values of plan assets were:

Medically underwritten insurance policies
Quoted equities
Hedge funds and diversified growth funds
Corporate bonds
Gilts and liability driven investments
Other
Total market value of assets

UK 
£m

43.2
37.6
10.7
19.7
21.9
5.5
138.6

2019
Overseas 
£m

–
7.0
–
0.1
4.5
2.2
13.8

Total 
£m

43.2
44.6
10.7
19.8
26.4
7.7
152.4

UK 
£m

44.2
45.1
15.4
9.4
24.7
1.9
140.7

2018
Overseas 
£m

–
6.6
–
0.1
4.3
2.1
13.1

Total 
£m

44.2
51.7
15.4
9.5
29.0
4.0
153.8

The medically underwritten insurance policies are shown at a value that exactly matches the estimated associated insured liabilities. Equities 
are investments in quoted equities only. Hedge funds and diversified growth funds hold a range of assets which aim to deliver returns above 
those of bonds but at lower volatility than equities. The assets held materially reflect the underlying liabilities, in that lower risk assets, such as 
gilts and bonds, are deemed to be a match for pensioner liabilities whereas equities are deemed a better match for the liabilities associated with 
scheme members not yet in retirement.

Liability Driven Investments (LDI) are a portfolio of assets that are linked to the drivers of movements in pension liabilities, such as inflation 
and interest rates. These are assets designed to deliver geared movements in the underlying liabilities as they reflect changes to inflation and 
interest rates.

PENSION OBLIGATIONS

The movement in the present value of the defined benefit obligation is as follows:

Opening obligation
Current service cost
Past service cost
Interest expense
Remeasurement gains/(losses) by changes in:
– Experience
– Demographic assumptions
– Financial assumptions and expenses
Benefits paid
Exchange adjustment
Closing obligation

The total defined benefit obligation can be 
analysed as follows:
Funded pension plans
Unfunded pension plans

UK 
£m

(210.3)
–
4.4
(5.4)

(10.3)
(0.5)
–
10.9
–
(211.2)

(211.2)
–
(211.2)

2019
Overseas 
£m

(40.9)
(0.2)
–
(1.0)

(0.4)
(0.3)
(2.0)
2.3
(0.6)
(43.1)

(25.8)
(17.3)
(43.1)

Total 
£m

(251.2)
(0.2)
4.4
(6.4)

(10.7)
(0.8)
(2.0)
13.2
(0.6)
(254.3)

(237.0)
(17.3)
(254.3)

UK 
£m

(218.4)
–
–
(5.2)

–
(2.2)
3.0
12.5
–
(210.3)

(210.3)
–
(210.3)

2018
Overseas 
£m

(44.2)
(0.2)
–
(1.1)

0.9
0.1
0.1
2.3
1.2
(40.9)

(15.8)
(25.1)
(40.9)

Total 
£m

(262.6)
(0.2)
–
(6.3)

0.9
(2.1)
3.1
14.8
1.2
(251.2)

(226.1)
(25.1)
(251.2)

The UK liabilities above include £43.2m that are fully insured (2018: £44.2m).

126

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   126

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

18. Pensions continued
PENSION ASSETS

The movement in the present value of the defined benefit plan assets is as follows:

Opening assets
Interest income
Remeasurement gains/(losses)
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Exchange adjustment
Closing assets
Balance sheet reconciliation:
Plan obligations
Plan assets
Net plan deficit

UK 
£m

140.7
3.5
2.3
3.0
(10.9)
–
138.6

(211.2)
138.6
(72.6)

2019
Overseas 
£m

13.1
0.5
–
0.3
(1.0)
0.9
13.8

(43.1)
13.8
(29.3)

Total 
£m

153.8
4.0
2.3
3.3
(11.9)
0.9
152.4

(254.3)
152.4
(101.9)

The net amount of remeasurement gains and losses taken to other comprehensive income is as follows:

On plan obligations
On plan assets
Net gains/(losses)

UK 
£m

(10.8)
2.3
(8.5)

2019
Overseas 
£m

(2.7)
–
(2.7)

Total 
£m

(13.5)
2.3
(11.2)

UK 
£m

146.4
3.5
0.4
2.9
(12.5)
–
140.7

(210.3)
140.7
(69.6)

UK 
£m

0.8
0.4
1.2

2018
Overseas 
£m

14.2
0.5
0.5
0.4
(1.0)
(1.5)
13.1

(40.9)
13.1
(27.8)

2018
Overseas 
£m

1.1
0.5
1.6

The actual return on plan assets was a gain of £6.3m (2018: gain £4.9m) which equates to 3.2% (2018: 3.2%) of plan assets.

An analysis of amounts charged to operating costs is set out below:

Operating costs
Pension administration costs
Current service cost
Past service cost

19. Called up share capital

Ordinary shares of 5p each

At 31 March 2019, the issued ordinary share capital comprised 225,417,740 ordinary shares of 5p each (2018: 225,417,740).

Preference stock of £1 each

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   127

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

2019
£m

(0.8)
(0.2)
4.4
3.4

Issued

2019
£m

11.3
11.3

Issued

2019
£m

0.5
0.5

Total 
£m

160.6
4.0
0.9
3.3
(13.5)
(1.5)
153.8

(251.2)
153.8
(97.4)

Total 
£m

1.9
0.9
2.8

2018
£m

(0.9)
(0.2)
–
(1.1)

2018
£m

11.3
11.3

2018
£m

0.5
0.5

127

22/08/2019   17:28:55

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

20. Share-based payments
ACCOUNTING POLICY

The Group operates equity-settled share-based compensation plans. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant 
of the options is calculated using a Black–Scholes pricing model and is recognised as an expense over the vesting period. The total amount to 
be expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference to the fair value of the options or performance shares granted. At each balance 
sheet date, the Group revises its estimate of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. It recognises the impact of the 
revision of original estimates, if any, in the income statement, and a corresponding adjustment to equity over the remaining vesting period. 
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest except for awards where vesting is conditional upon market or non-vesting 
conditions. Options with market conditions are accounted for as vesting, irrespective of whether or not the market or non-vesting condition is 
satisfied, provided that all other performance or service conditions are satisfied. The market-based conditions are linked to the market price of 
shares in the Company.

Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified or a new award is designated as replacing a cancelled or settled award, the cost 
based on the original award terms continues to be recognised over the original vesting period. In addition, an expense is recognised over the 
remainder of the new vesting period for the incremental fair value of any modification, based on the difference between the fair value of the 
original award and the fair value of the modified award, both as measured on the date of the modification. No reduction is recognised if this 
difference is negative.

The fair value per option granted in the period and the assumptions used in the calculation are as follows:

Grant date
Share price at date of grant
Exercise price
Number of employees
Shares under option
Vesting period (years)
Expected volatility
Option life (years)
Risk free interest rate
Assumed dividends expressed as a dividend yield
Fair value per option

2019
Executive share option scheme

2018
Executive share option scheme

08.06.18*
32.00p
0.0p
21
4,399,128
3
73%
10
1.0%
Zero
32.00p

08.06.18*
32.00p
0.0p
1
1,039,141
3
73%
10
1.0%
Zero
16.32p

15.06.18
29.40p
0.0p
1
237,869
3
73%
10
1.0%
Zero
29.40p

05.06.17*
54.79p
0.0p
26
2,279,491
3
66%
10
1.0%
Zero
54.79p

05.06.17*
54.79p
0.0p
1
547,545
3
66%
10
1.0%
Zero
19.81p

*  

 Single grants to the Chief Executive Officer were made on 08 June 2018 and 05 June 2017. Half of the options are subject to market conditions and half to non-
market conditions, therefore the two parts of the award have been shown separately due to their differing fair values.

The expected volatility is based on historical volatility over the last three years. The risk free rate of return is the yield on zero coupon UK 
government bonds of a term consistent with the assumed option life. Dividend yields indicated above are an expression of assumed dividends 
over the respective periods included in the calculation. These assumptions may not be borne out in practice. A reconciliation of option 
movements over the year to 31 March 2019 is shown below:

EXECUTIVE SHARE OPTION SCHEMES

Outstanding at 1 April
Granted
Exercised
Expired
Lapsed
Forfeited
Outstanding at 31 March
Exercisable at 31 March

2019

2018

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

3.1p
0.0p
–
0.0p
–
0.0p
2.3p
10.3p

Number

11,133,750
5,676,138
–
(1,138,092)
–
(768,250)
14,903,546
3,379,224

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

3.4p
0.0p
–
0.0p
–
0.0p
3.1p
10.7p

Number

10,273,923
2,827,036
–
(1,279,762)
–
(687,447)
11,133,750
3,247,096

128

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   128

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:55

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

20. Share-based payments continued

Range of exercise prices

Nil
20p to 30p
30p to 40p
40p to 100p

2019

2018

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

–
26.2p
37.3p
–

Number of 
shares

13,633,844
1,145,038
124,664
–

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

–
26.2p
37.3p
–

Number of 
shares

9,864,048
1,145,038
124,664
–

The weighted average contractual life remaining is 7.5 years (2018: 7.5 years).

No options have been exercised in the period (2018: nil). The total credit/(charge) for the year relating to employee share-based payment plans 
was £0.3m debit (2018: £0.2m credit), all of which related to equity settled share-based transactions.

The middle market price of ordinary shares at 31 March 2019 was 26.80p and the range of prices during the year was 22.00p to 40.80p.

Details of the share-based payment arrangements for Executive Directors are provided in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 66 to 
82. At 31 March 2019, unexercised options for ordinary shares amounted to 14,903,546 (2018: 11,133,750).

21. Reserves
The currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of financial statements of foreign operations 
and the proportion of the gains or losses on hedging instruments used to hedge against movements in net investments in foreign operations 
that are determined to be effective.

The capital redemption reserve represents the nominal value of the deferred shares repurchased and cancelled during the year ended 31 March 
2018. The reserve is not distributable.

Other reserves record the portion of the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge.

Cumulative goodwill written off directly to Group reserves at 31 March 2019 amounted to £3.5m (2018: £3.5m).

Included in retained earnings is an amount of £3.5m (net of tax) (2018: £3.6m) relating to the revaluation of freehold property that was 
undertaken at the date of IFRS adoption. The amount is not distributable until it is realised.

22. Operating lease obligations
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Leases where a significant portion of the risk and reward of ownership is retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments 
made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over 
the period of the lease.

The Group has entered into leases on commercial properties and plant and equipment. Minimum rental commitments under non-cancellable 
operating leases at the year end are as follows:

Within one year
Between two and five years
Over five years

2019

2018

Properties 
£m

Equipment 
£m

Properties 
£m

Equipment 
£m

 2.3 
 6.0 
 7.6 
 15.9 

 1.1 
 1.8 
 – 
 2.9 

2.6
5.7
8.2
16.5

1.1
2.7
–
3.8

Certain of the leased properties have been sublet and the future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable 
sublease agreements is £1.2m (2018: £1.7m).

An onerous lease provision was established in 2014 following the closure of the Bredbury manufacturing facility and is currently £2.7m (2018: 
£3.0m) (see Note 16). The lease expires in May 2030 at a rental cost of £0.8m per annum and is included in the analysis above. A significant 
proportion of this site is sublet for a term of five years to 2021 for a rent of £0.5m per annum. 

An additional onerous lease provision of £1.6m was established in 2017 following the sale of the Mulgrave manufacturing facility. The lease 
expires in March 2020 at a cost of £0.5m per annum.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   129

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

129

22/08/2019   17:28:56

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

23. Contingent liabilities and commitments
Performance guarantees given to third parties in respect of Group companies were £nil (2018: £nil).

Various UK Group companies have given guarantees to the merged UK pension scheme to cover the full cost of buying out the liabilities in 
the event that the sponsoring employer’s defaulted on the agreed deficit repair plan. As one of the sponsoring employers of the UK scheme is 
Renold plc, the continuing obligation is effectively unchanged and is to fully fund the members’ accrued benefits.

24. Additional cash flow information
Reconciliation of operating profit to net cash flows from operations:

Cash generated from operations:
Operating profit
Depreciation and amortisation
Impairment of goodwill
Loss on disposals of plant and equipment
Equity share plans
Increase in inventories
Increase in receivables
Increase in payables
(Decrease)/increase in provisions
Cash contribution to pensions
Pension past service credit (non-cash)

Cash generated from operations

1 

See Note 27 for details of the restatement. 

Reconciliation of net change in cash and cash equivalents to movement in net debt:

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Change in net debt resulting from cash flows
Foreign currency translation differences
Non-cash movement on capitalised finance costs
Change in net debt during the period
Net debt at start of year

Net debt at end of year

Net debt comprises:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 13)
Total borrowings (Note 14)

2019
£m

15.2
8.6
–
0.9
0.4
(2.6)
(0.8)
1.9
(4.6)
(4.5)
(4.4)
10.1

2019
£m

6.5
(12.0)
(1.4)
0.9
(6.0)
(24.3)
(30.3)

17.6
(47.9)
(30.3)

2018
(restated1)
£m

5.1
8.2
2.1
–
–
(2.5)
(0.9)
1.2
1.0
(4.4)
–
9.8

2018
£m

(2.6)
(3.8)
(0.5)
–
(6.9)
(17.4)
(24.3)

13.9
(38.2)
(24.3)

130

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   130

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

25. Financial instruments
ACCOUNTING POLICY

The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as forward currency contracts to hedge its risks associated with foreign currency and 
interest rate fluctuations. Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is 
entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value. Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities 
when the fair value is negative.

The fair value of forward currency contracts is calculated by reference to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar  
maturity profiles.

For those derivatives designated as hedges and for which hedge accounting is desired, the hedging relationship is formally designated and 
documented at its inception. This documentation identifies the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, the hedging 
instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how effectiveness will be measured throughout its 
duration. Such hedges are expected at inception to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows and are assessed on an 
ongoing basis to determine that they actually have been highly effective throughout the reporting period for which they were designated.

For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as:

 •

 •

Cash flow hedges when hedging exposure to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to a particular risk associated with a 
recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction; or

Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation.

There are no fair value hedges.

Any gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are taken to the income 
statement. The treatment of gains and losses arising from revaluing derivatives designated as hedging instruments depends on the nature of 
the hedging relationship, as follows:

(a) Cash flow hedges

For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised directly in other comprehensive income, 
while the ineffective portion is recognised in the income statement. Amounts taken to other comprehensive income are transferred to the 
income statement when the hedged transaction affects the income statement, such as when a forecast sale occurs.

If a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are transferred to the 
income statement. If the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised without replacement or rollover, or if its designation as 
a hedge is revoked, amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income remain in equity until the forecast transaction occurs and 
are transferred to the income statement or to the initial carrying amount of a non-financial asset or liability as above. If the related transaction 
is not expected to occur, the amount is taken to the income statement.

(b) Hedges of a net investment

Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, including a hedge of a monetary item that is accounted for as part of the net investment, are 
accounted for in a way similar to cash flow hedges. Gains or losses relating to the effective portion are recognised in other comprehensive income, 
while any gains or losses relating to the ineffective portion are recognised in the income statement. On loss of control of the foreign operation, the 
cumulative value of any such gains or losses recognised directly in other comprehensive income is transferred to the income statement.

Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or other host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their risks and 
characteristics are not closely related to those of the host contract and the host contract is not stated at its fair value with changes in its fair 
value recognised in the income statement.

The Group’s 6% cumulative preference stock of £1 each ‘Preference Stock’ has been classified as a liability. Dividends payable are included 
within net finance costs.

These notes should be read in conjunction with the narrative disclosures in the Finance Director’s Review on pages 24 to 29.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK AND SENSITIVITY

As a result of the significant operations in the US, Europe and China, the Group’s balance sheet can be affected significantly by movements in 
the US Dollar/Sterling, Euro/Sterling, and US Dollar/Euro exchange rates. In order to manage these risks the Group enters into currency forward 
contracts designated as cash flow hedge relationships and foreign currency borrowings designated as net investment hedges.

The financial impact of changes in the mark to market value of the currency forward contracts for reasonably possible changes in the value of 
Sterling on the Group’s result before tax and the Group’s equity is set out in the following table. There is no effect on profit before tax because all 
currency forward contracts are designated as hedging instruments. The impact of translating the net assets of foreign operations into Sterling is 
excluded from the sensitivity analysis.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   131

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

131

22/08/2019   17:28:56

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

25. Financial instruments continued
Decrease/(increase) in the value of US Dollar compared to other currencies:

2019

2018

INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

Decrease/
(increase) in 
US$ value

Effect on equity of  
currency forward contracts
£m

Effect on equity of net 
investment hedge
£m

25%
(10%)
25%
(10%)

(3.6)
2.7
–
–

1.3 
(0.7)
1.2 
(0.7)

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in the basis points of the Group’s floating interest rates:

Sterling
US Dollar
Euro

(A) BALANCE SHEET POSITION ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The balance sheet position on financial instruments is set out below:

Current assets:
Forward foreign currency contracts: cash flow hedge
Current liabilities:
Forward foreign currency contracts: cash flow hedge

Increase in 
basis points

+150
+150
+150

2019 
Effect on profit  
before tax
£m

2018 
Effect on profit 
before tax
£m

(0.5)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.7)

2019
£m

–

(0.4)

(0.4)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.6)

2018
£m

0.4

–

The cash flow hedges of the expected future transactions in US Dollars and Euros in the prior year were assessed to be highly effective. In the 
period £nil (2018: £nil) was transferred to operating costs in the income statement.

(B) SHORT-TERM RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES

The carrying amount of short-term receivables and payables (being those with a remaining life of less than one year) is deemed to approximate 
to their fair value.

(C) HEDGE OF NET INVESTMENT IN FOREIGN ENTITY

The Group has US Dollar denominated borrowings which it has designated as a hedge of the net investment in its subsidiaries in the US. The 
carrying value of the US Dollar borrowings at 31 March 2019 was £6.7m (2018: £6.2m). £0.5m of exchange loss (2018: £0.7m gain) on translation 
of the borrowings into Sterling is included as part of the hedging reserve movement in other comprehensive income as the hedge was deemed 
to be effective.

132

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   132

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

25. Financial instruments continued

(D) CURRENCY AND INTEREST RATE PROFILE OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES OF THE GROUP

Currency

Sterling
– Financial liabilities
– Preference Stock
US Dollar
Euro
Other

Fixed rate 
£m

2019
Floating rate 
£m

Total 
£m

Fixed rate 
£m

2018
Floating rate 
£m

–
0.5
–
–
–
0.5

36.2
–
6.7
4.3
0.2
47.4

36.2
0.5
6.7
4.3
0.2
47.9

–
0.5
–
–
–
0.5

25.6
–
7.2
4.3
0.6
37.7

Total 
£m

25.6
0.5
7.2
4.3
0.6
38.2

Floating rate financial liabilities bear interest at rates based on relevant national base rate equivalents, which can fluctuate on a daily basis. 
The other financial instruments of the Group that are not included in the above tables are non-interest bearing and are therefore not subject to 
interest risk.

Interest rate risk

Exposure to the risk of changes in market interest rates relates primarily to the Group’s Sterling, US Dollar and Euro debt obligations.

Credit risk

The Group trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties. It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms 
are subject to credit verification procedures. In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s 
exposure to bad debts is not significant. The maximum exposure is the carrying amount as disclosed in Note 12. There are no significant 
concentrations of credit risk within the Group.

With respect to credit risk arising from other financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash equivalents and certain derivative 
instruments, the Group’s exposure to credit risk has a maximum exposure equal to the carrying value of these instruments. The Group has a 
policy to place cash on deposit and hold derivatives with members of the banking syndicate wherever possible.

(E) CURRENCY AND INTEREST RATE PROFILE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AT 31 MARCH 2019

Cash at bank and in hand by currency

Sterling
Euro
US Dollar
Other

2019
£m

0.3
6.5
4.7
6.1
17.6

2018
£m

0.9
6.4
1.3
5.3
13.9

Cash balances are held with the Group’s bankers. These deposits are held largely in Germany and earn interest at bank deposit interest rates for 
periods of up to three months.

(F) MATURITY OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The maturity profile of the contracted amount of the Group’s financial liabilities was as follows:

Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Interest paid on borrowings
Trade payables, other payables and accruals
Forward foreign exchange contracts – outflow
Preference Stock1

1 

No fixed repayment date.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

One year 
or less on 
demand
£m
–
1.8
42.1
14.2
–
58.1

One to 
two years
£m
–
–
–
–
–
–

2019

Two to 
five years
£m
47.4
–
–
–
–
47.4

More than 
five years
£m
–
–
5.4
–
0.5
5.9

Total
£m
47.4
1.8
47.5
14.2
0.5
111.4

133

Renold 2019-AR.indd   133

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

25. Financial instruments continued

One year 
or less on 
demand
£m

–
1.8
40.2
0.7
11.8
–
54.5

2018

One to 
two years
£m

Two to 
five years
£m

More than 
five years
£m

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

37.7
–
–
–
–
–
37.7

–
–
0.3
–
–
0.5
0.8

Total
£m

37.7
1.8
40.5
0.7
11.8
0.5
93.0

Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Interest paid on borrowings
Trade payables, other payables and accruals (restated2)
Provisions – contingent consideration
Forward foreign exchange contracts – outflow
Preference Stock1

1 

2 

No fixed repayment date.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

The Group’s contracted forward contracts are £9.2m to sell US Dollars and buy Euros, £5.0m to sell US Dollars and buy Sterling, and nil to sell 
Sterling and buy Chinese Renminbi (2018: £7.8m, nil, and £4m respectively). The US Dollar/Euro contracts cover the intra-group purchases 
in Euros by our US operations. The US Dollars/Sterling contracts cover intra-group purchases in Sterling by our US operations and US Dollar 
interest payments received in the UK.

(G) BORROWING FACILITIES

The Group has the following undrawn committed borrowing facilities available at the year end date in respect of which all conditions precedent 
had been met at that date:

Expiring within one year or less, or on demand
Expiring between one and two years
Expiring between two and five years

2019
£m

1.3
–
12.5
13.8

2018
£m

1.8
–
23.0
24.8

The facilities expiring in one year or less, or on demand, are primarily annual facilities subject to review at various dates during the year ended 
31 March 2019.

(H) FAIR VALUES

Set out below is a comparison by category of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Group’s financial instruments excluding derivatives, 
short-term trade payables and short-term trade receivables which are already carried at fair value (or where the carrying amount approximates 
fair value):

Financial assets – cash
Financial liabilities – floating rate bank overdraft
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Floating rate borrowing
Preference Stock

Carrying value
2019
£m

17.6 
–

(47.4)
(0.5)

2018
£m

13.9 
(1.3)

(37.7)
(0.5)

Fair value

2019
£m

17.6
–

(47.4)
(0.5)

2018
£m

13.9 
(1.3)

(37.7)
(0.5)

The fair value of borrowings has been calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows at prevailing interest rates.

With reference to the fair value hierarchy opposite, the above financial instruments are level 2 except Preference Stock which is level 1.

134

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   134

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

  
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

25. Financial instruments continued

Fair value hierarchy

The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:

Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly or 
indirectly; and

Level 3: techniques which use inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable financial 
market data.

As at 31 March 2019, the Group held the following financial instruments measured at fair value:

Assets measured at fair value
Forward foreign currency contracts: cash flow hedge

As at 31 March 2018:

Liabilities measured at fair value
Forward foreign currency contracts: cash flow hedge

Total 
£m

(0.4)

Total 
£m

0.4

Level 1 
£m

Level 2
£m

Level 3 
£m 

–

(0.4)

–

Level 1 
£m

Level 2
£m

Level 3 
£m 

–

0.4

–

The fair value of derivatives has been calculated by reference to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar maturity profiles.

(I) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The primary objective of the Group’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a satisfactory credit rating and capital ratios in order to 
support its business and maximise shareholder value.

The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the 
capital structure, the Group may adjust the dividend payment to the shareholders, return capital to the shareholders or issue new shares. No 
changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during the years ended 31 March 2019 and 31 March 2018.

The Group monitors capital using two gearing ratios, one of which is net debt divided by total capital plus net debt and the other is the ratio of 
net debt to adjusted EBITDA.

Net debt (Note 24)

Total capital 

Capital and net debt 
Gearing ratio 

Adjusted EBITDA1 (£m)
Net debt to adjusted EBITDA

1 

2 

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as adjusted operating profit adding back depreciation and amortisation charges in the period.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

26. Post balance sheet events
There were no significant post balance sheet events to report.

2019
£m

30.3

(3.1)

27.2
111%

2018
(restated2)
£m

24.3

(2.4)

21.9
111%

23.1
1.3 times

21.0
1.2 times

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   135

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

135

22/08/2019   17:28:56

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

27. Prior period adjustment
A prior period adjustment has been recorded in these accounts following the identification of historical accounting issues over the three years 
ending 31 March 2017, 2018 and 2019, arising from an overstatement of certain asset values and understatement of certain liabilities resulting 
in an overstatement of profit over this period by £2.5m in the Gears business unit, which is part of the Torque Transmission division. The 
impact, on a line item basis for those affected, on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31 March 2018, the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2017 and as at 31 March 2018 is as follows:

Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 31 March 2018

Revenue
Operating costs

Operating profit 
Profit before tax
Profit/(loss) for the financial year
Total comprehensive income/(expense)  
for the year, net of tax
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest

Earnings/(loss) per share
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

Statutory

Adjusted1

As previously 
reported 
£m

Restatement 
£m

2018
Statutory 
(restated) 
£m

As previously 
reported 
£m

Restatement 
£m

2018
Adjusted1
(restated)
£m

191.6
(177.9)
13.7
12.0
9.7

191.6
(177.4)
14.2
12.5
10.2

–
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)

191.6
(186.0)
5.6
1.4
(2.2)

(5.7)

(5.8)
0.1
(5.7)

(1.0p)
(1.0p)

–
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)

(0.5)

(0.5)
–
(0.5)

(0.2p)
(0.2p)

191.6
(186.5)
5.1
0.9
(2.7)

(6.2)

(6.3)
0.1
(6.2)

(1.2p)
(1.2p)

4.5p
4.5p

(0.2p)
(0.3p)

4.3p
4.2p

1 

 Adjusted for the after tax effects of pension administration costs, restructuring costs, changes in the provision discounts, IAS 19R financing costs, impairment of 
goodwill and amortisation of acquired intangible assets (see page 109).

136

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   136

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

27. Prior period adjustment continued

Consolidated Balance Sheet
as at 31 March

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Other non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Other current assets

Non-current asset classified as held for sale

TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Other current liabilities

NET CURRENT ASSETS
Non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Other equity items
Retained earnings

Equity attributable to equity holders  
of the parent
Non-controlling interests
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

2018

2017

As previously 
reported 
£m

Restatement 
£m

2018
 (restated) 
£m

As previously 
reported 
£m

Restatement 
£m

2017
(restated)
£m

47.7
50.5
98.2

41.0
36.4
14.3
91.7
– 
91.7
189.9

(39.6)
(7.1)
(46.7)
45.0
(142.1)
(188.8)
1.1

65.3
(66.2)

(0.9)
2.0
1.1

(0.4)
–
(0.4)

(0.2)
(0.3)
–
(0.5)
–
(0.5)
(0.9)

(0.6)
–
(0.6)
(1.1)
–
(0.6)
(1.5)

–
(1.5)

(1.5)
–
(1.5)

47.3
50.5
97.8

40.8
36.1
14.3
91.2
–
91.2
189.0

(40.2)
(7.1)
(47.3)
43.9
(142.1)
(189.4)
(0.4)

65.3
(67.7)

(2.4)
2.0
(0.4)

47.2
57.0
104.2

40.4
36.8
16.4
93.6
0.3
93.9
198.1

(41.9)
(8.7)
(50.6)
43.3
(139.7)
(190.3)
7.8

70.0
(64.9)

5.1
2.7
7.8

(0.4)
–
(0.4)

(0.2)
(0.1)
–
(0.3)
–
(0.3)
(0.7)

(0.3)
–
(0.3)
(0.9)
–
(0.3)
(1.0)

–
(1.0)

(1.0)
–
(1.0)

46.8
57.0
103.8

40.2
36.7
16.4
93.3
0.3
93.6
197.4

(42.2)
(8.7)
(50.9)
42.4
(139.7)
(190.6)
6.8

70.0
(65.9)

4.1
2.7
6.8

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   137

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

137

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements

28. Revisions to the 2019 financial statements
These revised financial statements replace the original financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 which were approved by the 
Board on 28 May 2019. These revised financial statements are now the statutory financial statements for that year. They have been prepared 
as at the date of the original financial statements (28 May 2019) and not as at the date of revision (23 August 2019) and accordingly do not deal 
with events between those dates.

Following publication of the Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2019, the Board have identified that a revision is required to 
reflect the over-statement of certain assets and the under-statement of certain liabilities within the Gears business unit which is part of the 
Torque Transmission division. The over and under-statements have resulted in the profit for the year ended 31 March 2019 being over-stated by 
£1.0m in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and net assets being over-stated by £2.5m in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as 
set out below. 

Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 31 March 2019

Revenue
Operating costs

Operating profit 
Profit before tax
Profit/(loss) for the financial year
Total comprehensive income/(expense)  
for the year, net of tax
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest

Earnings/(loss) per share
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

Statutory

Adjusted1

As previously 
reported 
£m

Revision
 £m

2019
Statutory 
(revised) 
£m

As previously 
reported 
£m

2019
Adjusted1
(revised)
£m

202.4
(187.0)
15.4
13.2
10.3

Revision
 £m

–
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)

202.4
(186.0)
16.4
14.2
11.3

202.4
(186.2)
16.2
11.2
7.7

0.1

(0.1)
0.2
0.1

3.3p
3.2p

–
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(1.0)

(1.0)

(1.0)
–
(1.0)

(0.4p)
(0.4p)

202.4
(187.2)
15.2
10.2
6.7

(0.9)

(1.1)
0.2
(0.9)

2.9p
2.8p

4.9p
4.8p

(0.4p)
(0.5p)

4.5p
4.3p

1 

 Adjusted for the after tax effects of pension administration costs, restructuring costs, changes in the provision discounts, IAS 19R financing costs, impairment of 
goodwill and amortisation of acquired intangible assets (see page 109).

138

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   138

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

28. Revisions to the 2019 financial statements continued

Consolidated Balance Sheet
as at 31 March 2019

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Other non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Other current liabilities

NET CURRENT ASSETS
Non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Other equity items
Retained earnings

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent
Non-controlling interests
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

As previously 
reported 
£m

Revision 
 £m

31 March 2019
 (revised) 
£m

55.8
51.2
107.0

44.8
37.8
17.9
100.5
207.5

(41.0)
(1.6)
(42.6)
57.9
(163.3)
(205.9)
1.6

66.8
(67.4)
(0.6)
2.2
1.6

(0.3)
–
(0.3)

(0.5)
(0.3)
(0.3)
(1.1)
(1.4)

(1.1)
–
(1.1)
(2.2)
–
(1.1)
(2.5)

–
(2.5)
(2.5)
–
(2.5)

55.5
51.2
106.7

44.3
37.5
17.6
99.4
206.1

(42.1)
(1.6)
(43.7)
55.7
(163.3)
(207.0)
(0.9)

66.8
(69.9)
(3.1)
2.2
(0.9)

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   139

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

139

22/08/2019   17:28:56

 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Group Five Year Financial Review

Group revenue

Adjusted operating profit

Operating profit/(loss)
Profit/(loss) before tax
Taxation
Profit/(loss) for the year

Net assets employed
Tangible and intangible fixed assets
Working capital and other net assets
Operating assets

Goodwill

Net debt
Deferred and current taxation
Provisions

Net assets excluding pension obligations
Pension obligations
Total net assets

Other data and ratios
Return on capital employed (%)1
Return on sales (%)2
Capital expenditure (£m)
Basic earnings/(loss) per share (p)
Employees at year end

2019
£m

202.4

15.4
15.2
10.2
(3.5)
6.7

62.1
33.9
96.0

23.1

(30.3)
15.5
(3.3)

101.0
(101.9)
(0.9)

 13.1 
 7.6 
15.2
2.9
2,059

2018
(restated3)
£m

191.6

2017
(restated3)
£m

183.4

13.7
5.1
0.9
(3.6)
(2.7)

55.6
36.8
92.4

21.6

(24.3)
15.2
(7.9)

97.0
(97.4)
(0.4)

 12.1 
 7.2 
9.5
(1.2)
2,044

13.5
10.0
5.7
(1.9)
3.8

56.5
34.6
91.1

26.4

(17.4)
16.4
(7.7)

108.8
(102.0)
6.8

11.7
 7.4
10.9
1.9
2,139

2016
£m

165.2

14.2
11.1
7.4
(2.0)
5.4

54.7
31.2
85.9

22.7

(23.5)
14.5
(6.2)

93.4
(82.9)
10.5

13.7
8.6
8.8
2.4
2,187

2015
£m

181.4

15.5
12.1
7.7
(2.1)
5.6

45.8
30.0
75.8

21.9

(19.5)
15.5
(6.4)

87.3
(75.7)
11.6

15.6
8.5
6.6
2.5
2,243

1 

2 

3 

Being adjusted operating profit divided by average operating assets and goodwill.

Based on adjusted operating profit divided by revenue.

See Note 27 for details of the restatement.

140

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   140

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Accounting Policies

A summary of the principal Company accounting policies is set out below. These have been applied on a consistent basis unless  
otherwise indicated.

Basis of accounting
The Parent Company financial statements of Renold plc meet the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 100 (Financial Reporting Standard 
100). The financial statements have therefore been prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure 
Framework (FRS 101)’.

In these financial statements, the Company has applied the exemptions available under FRS 101 in relation to share-based payments, financial 
instruments, capital management, presentation of a cash flow statement, presentation of comparative information in respect of certain assets, 
standards not yet effective, impairment of assets and related party transactions.

The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis and on the going concern basis. Historical cost is generally based on the 
fair value of the consideration given in exchange for the goods and services. The principal accounting policies adopted and significant accounting 
judgement, estimates and assumptions are the same as those set out in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented its own statement of comprehensive income 
(including the profit and loss account).

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   141

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

141

22/08/2019   17:28:57

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Company Balance Sheet
 as at 31 March 2019 

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Trade and other receivables
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments

NET CURRENT LIABILITIES

Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Preference stock
Retirement benefit obligations

TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS

Capital and reserves
Issued share capital
Share premium account
Capital redemption reserve
Currency translation reserve
Retained earnings

SHAREHOLDERS’ FUNDS

Note

i
ii
iii
v
iv

v

vi
viii
vii

vi
viii
viii
ix

x

2019
£m

 4.6 
 0.3 
 163.5 
 8.9 
 3.1 
 180.4 

 7.0 
 0.2 
 7.2 
 187.6 

(3.7) 
(4.9) 
 –   
(8.6) 
(1.4) 

(62.5) 
(32.0)
(0.5)
(18.1)
(113.1)
(121.7)
 65.9 

 11.3 
 30.1 
 15.4 
 7.4 
 1.7 
 65.9 

2018
£m

5.4
0.3
157.6
9.4
3.0
175.7

4.5
0.1
4.6
180.3

(4.9)
(2.3)
–
(7.2)
(2.6)

(62.5)
(20.9)
(0.5)
(17.4)
(101.3)
(108.5)
71.8

11.3
30.1
15.4
5.2
9.8
71.8

The loss of Renold plc (registered number 249688) for the year ended 31 March 2019 was £6.7m (2018: profit of £1.3m).

Approved by the Board on 23 August 2019 and signed on its behalf by:

ROBERT PURCELL   IAN SCAPENS
Chief Executive  

Finance Director

142

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   142

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

 
 
 
 
 
OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Company Statement of  
Changes in Equity
 for the year ended 31 March 2019

At 31 March 2017
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive income/(expense)
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for 
the year
Proceeds from share issue
Employee share options:
 – value of employee services

At 31 March 2018
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income/(expense)
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for 
the year
Employee share options:
 – value of employee services

At 31 March 2019

Share 
capital
£m 
Note x 

26.7
–
–

–
(15.4)

–
11.3
–
–

–

–

11.3

Share 
premium 
account 
£m

Capital 
redemption
reserve
£m

Retained 
earnings
£m

Currency 
translation 
reserve
£m 

30.1
–
–

–
–

–
30.1
–
–

–

–

–
–
–

–
15.4

–
15.4
–
–

–

–

30.1

15.4

 8.5 
 1.3 
 0.2 

 1.5 
 –   

(0.2) 
 9.8 
(6.7)
(1.8)

(8.5)

0.4

1.7

 8.6 
 –   
(3.4) 

(3.4) 
 –   

–   
 5.2 
–
2.2

2.2

–

7.4

Total 
equity
£m 

 73.9 
 1.3 
(3.2) 

(1.9) 
–   

(0.2) 
 71.8 
(6.7)
0.4

(6.3)
–
0.4

65.9

All attributable to the equity shareholders of the Company.

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   143

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

143

22/08/2019   17:28:57

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Company  
Financial Statements

(i) Intangible assets – software

Cost
At beginning of year
Additions at cost

At end of year

Depreciation
At beginning of year
Depreciation for the year

At end of year

Net book value at end of year
Net book value at beginning of year

(ii) Property, plant and equipment

Cost
At beginning of year
Additions

At end of year

Depreciation
At beginning of year
Depreciation for the year

At end of year

Net book value at end of year
Net book value at beginning of year

FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

Total
£m

 13.2 
1.3   

 14.5 

 7.8 
2.1

 9.9 

 4.6 
5.4

Property
£m

Equipment
£m

Total
£m

0.2
–

0.2

0.1
–
0.1

0.1
0.1

0.2
0.1

0.3

–
0.1
0.1

0.2
0.2

0.4
0.1

0.5

0.1
0.1
0.2

0.3
0.3

At 31 March 2019, contracted capital expenditure not provided for in these financial statements for which contracts have been placed amounted 
to £0.1m (2018: £0.1m).

144

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   144

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(iii) Investments in subsidiary undertakings
ACCOUNTING POLICY

Investments in subsidiary companies are accounted for at cost and reviewed for impairment on an annual basis. Where indicators of 
impairment are present, the cashflows of the underlying entities are reviewed to determine whether the investment value is recoverable.

The results and financial position of Renold Scottish Limited Partnership (SLP) have been consolidated in the consolidated financial statements 
of Renold plc. Renold plc is a parent undertaking of the general partner in the SLP (see Note (xiii) to the Company financial statements). 
Accordingly, advantage has been taken of the exemption conferred by paragraph 7 of the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008 from the 
requirements for preparation, delivery and publication of the partnerships accounts.

Subsidiary undertakings
Cost or valuation
At beginning of year
Impairment
–  Renold (Hangzhou) Co Limited
–  Renold Crofts (Pty) Limited
Net additions

At end of year

Shares
£m

Loans
£m

Total
£m

62.0

95.6

157.6

–
–
–

62.0

(2.6)
(0.7)
9.2

101.5

(2.6)
(0.7)
9.2

163.5

As part of the relocation of the Group’s Chinese chain factory to Jintan, the operating company of the old factory in Hangzhou has ceased 
operations, resulting in an impairment of the loan receivable held by Renold plc. The annual impairment test of investments indicated that the 
investment in Renold Crofts (Pty) Limited exceeded the recoverable amount derived from the net present value of forecast cashflows resulting 
in the recognition of an impairment.

The subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 31 March 2019 are set out in Note (xiii).

(iv) Deferred tax assets

Pension plans

Recognised 
directly 
in other 
comprehensive 
income
£m

Recognised
in income 
statement
£m

(0.3)

0.4

Opening  
balance 
£m

3.0

Closing  
balance
£m 

3.1

Unrecognised deferred tax assets amount to £0.6m (2018: £0.5m) arising from accelerated capital allowances.

(v) Trade and other receivables

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings
Other debtors
Prepayments

2019
Current 
£m

2019
Non-current 
£m

2018
Current 
£m

2018
Non-current 
£m

5.8
0.3
0.9
7.0

–
–
8.9
8.9

3.4
0.2
0.9
4.5

–
–
9.4
9.4

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   145

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

145

22/08/2019   17:28:57

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Company  
Financial Statements

(vi) Trade and other payables 

Amounts falling due within one year:
Trade creditors
Other taxation and social security
Accruals
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

Amounts falling due after one year:
Loan from subsidiary undertakings

2019
£m

 0.9 
 0.2 
 2.6 
–
3.7

2019
£m

62.5

2018
£m

1.4
0.3
1.5
1.7
4.9

2018
£m

62.5

A 25-year loan of £62.5m was established with Renold International Holdings Limited in 2014. Interest, initially £2.5m per annum, increasing in 
line with RPI plus 1.5% capped at 5%, is payable for the period of the loan.

(vii) Derivative financial instrument

Forward foreign currency contracts – cash flow hedge

2019
£m

–

The Company has contracted forward contracts of £5.0m to sell US Dollars and buy Sterling (2018: £nil). The contracts cover intra-group 
purchases in Sterling by our US operations facilitated by Group Treasury and US Dollar interest payments received in the UK.

(viii) Borrowings

Amounts falling due after one year:

Bank loans repayable in two to five years

Summary of total borrowings:
Bank loans
Overdraft
Preference stock
Total borrowings

2019
£m

 32.0 

32.0
4.9
0.5
37.4

(ix) Pensions
Employees of the Company include members of the principal UK defined benefit schemes. The basis used to determine the deficit in the 
schemes is disclosed in Note 18 in the Group financial statements.

No contributions are outstanding at the year end.

2018
£m

–

2018
£m

20.9

20.9
2.3
0.5
23.7

146

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   146

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(x) Called up share capital

Ordinary shares of 5p each

Issued

2019
£m

11.3
11.3

At 31 March 2018, the issued ordinary share capital comprised 225,417,740 ordinary shares of 5p each (2018: 225,417,740).  

Preference stock of £1 each1

1 

Included in borrowings – see Note (viii).

Issued

2019
£m

0.5

2018
£m

11.3
11.3

2018
£m

0.5

The Employee Benefit Trust holds 364,879 fully paid ordinary shares of 5p each (2018: 364,879) to facilitate the exercise of share options by 
employees across the Company.

Disclosures in respect of capital management can be found in Note 24 of the consolidated financial statements.

(xi) Related party transactions
The following transactions were carried out with related parties:

(A) TRANSACTIONS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Key management personnel are represented by the Board. Their aggregate emoluments are set out in Note 2(d) of the consolidated  
financial statements.

(B) TRANSACTIONS WITH SUBSIDIARIES

The Company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions in FRS 101 not to disclose transactions with its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

During the year, the Company entered into transactions in the ordinary course of business with its 75%-owned subsidiary, Renold Chain India 
Private Limited. Transactions entered into and trading balances outstanding at 31 March with Renold Chain India Private Limited are as follows:

Amounts receivable as at 31 March
– Renold Chain India Private Limited

(C) TRANSACTIONS WITH OTHER RELATED PARTIES

The Company makes no transactions with other related parties.

(xii) Post balance sheet events
There were no significant post balance sheet events to report.

2019
£m

0.1
0.1

2018
£m

–
–

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   147

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

147

22/08/2019   17:28:57

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Company  
Financial Statements

(xiii) Subsidiary undertakings as at 31 March 2019
In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006, a full list of subsidiary undertakings, the country of incorporation and the effective 
percentage of equity owned, as at 31 March 2019 is disclosed below. Unless otherwise stated, the share capital disclosed comprises ordinary 
or common shares which are held by subsidiaries of the Renold Group. The UK subsidiaries are incorporated in England and Wales and the 
registered address of all offices is Trident 2, Trident Business Park, Styal Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M22 5XB unless stated.

UNITED KINGDOM

Renold Power Transmission Limited* 
Renold International Holdings Limited*
Renold Europe Limited*
Renold Holdings Limited*

UNITED KINGDOM (DORMANT COMPANIES)

Anchor Chain and Power Transmission Co Limited
Hans Renold Limited*
John Holroyd & Company Limited*
Jones & Shipman Limited*

UNITED KINGDOM (PENSION ENTITIES)

Renold Pensions Limited* (dormant)
Renold Group General Partner Limited*  Address: 3-5 Melville Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH3 7PE
Address: 3-5 Melville Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH3 7PE
Renold Scottish Limited Partnership  

Belgium
Denmark
France
Germany

Europe (other than the United Kingdom)
Renold GmbH
Austria
Renold Continental Limited  
(incorporated in the United Kingdom)
Renold A/S
Brampton Renold SAS*
Renold GmbH
Renold Holding GmbH*
Renold Automotive Systems Germany
Renold Polska sp. z o.o.
Renold Poland sp. z o.o.
Renold Hi-Tec Couplings SA
Renold Transmission AB (Sweden)
Renold (Switzerland) GmbH

Spain
Sweden
Switzerland

Poland

North America
Canada
USA

Renold Canada Limited*
Renold Inc
Jeffrey Chain LP
Renold Holdings Inc
Jeffrey Chain Acquisition Co Inc
Jeffrey Chain Corp

*  Direct subsidiary of Renold plc.

Kärntner Ring 12, A-1010 Wien

Kaerup Alle 2, 1. Benlose, 4100, Ringstad
100 rue du Courbillon, 59175, Vendeville
Juliusmühle, 37574, Einbeck
Juliusmühle, 37574, Einbeck
Juliusmühle, 37574, Einbeck
ul. Mlyńska 11, 40-098 Katowice, Poland
ul. Mlyńska 11, 40-098 Katowice, Poland
C/ Antoni Gaudi 21, Bajos 2o, Gavá, Barcelona

Ringstrasse 16, CH-8600, Dübendorf 1

622 rue De Hull, Montreal, Quebec, H8R 1VG
100 Bourne Street, Suite 2, Westfield, NY 14787
2307 Maden Drive, Morristown, TN  37813
2307 Maden Drive, Morristown, TN  37813
2307 Maden Drive, Morristown, TN  37813
2307 Maden Drive, Morristown, TN  37813

148

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   148

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

OVERVIEW

STRATEGIC REPORT

GOVERNANCE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(xiii) Subsidiary undertakings as at 31 March 2019 continued

Other countries
Australia

Renold Australia Proprietary Limited*

China

Renold Transmission (Shanghai) Company Limited

Renold Technologies (Shanghai) Company Limited

Renold (Hangzhou) Co Limited
Renold (China) Transmission Products Co Ltd

India

Renold Chain India Private Limited

Malaysia
New Zealand

Renold (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
Renold New Zealand Limited*

Singapore

Renold Retirement Trustee Limited
Renold Transmission Limited  
(incorporated in the United Kingdom)

South Africa

Renold Crofts (Pty) Limited*

Thailand

Renold (Thailand) Limited

*  Direct subsidiary of Renold plc.

508–520 Wellington Road, Mulgrave, Victoria 3170
Section A, Floor 3 of Composite Building, No. 18 North Fute Road, 
China (Shanghai) Pilot Free–Trade Zone, Shanghai
Building 3, No. 385 Zheng Zhong Xin Road, Beicai Town,  
Pudong, Shanghai
No.82 Dongfang Road, Yiqiao Town, Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou 
Municipality, Zhejiang Province
No. 168 Huacheng Road, Jintan District, Changzhou
S.F No: 568/1A, 569/1&2, D. Gudalur (P.O), Vedasanthur (T.K), 
Dindigul (D.T), Tamil Nadu – 624 620
No. 2, Jalan Anggerik Mokara 31/44, Kota Kemuning, Seksyen 31, 
40460 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
594 Rosebank Road, Avondale, Auckland
Melville Jessup Weaver, Level 5, 40 Mercer St,  
Wellington, 6142

Cnr Liverpool Road and Bolton Street, Nestadt Industrial Sites, 
Benoni, 2007, Gauteng
399 Interchange Building, Unit 10, 24th Floor, Sukhumvit 21 Road, 
Klongtoey Nua Sub-District, Wattana District, Bangkok

All of our companies, with the exception of Renold Chain India Private Limited, are wholly-owned direct or indirect subsidiaries of Renold 
plc, a company incorporated in England and Wales, which ultimately holds a 100% interest in the equity shares and voting rights (except for 
Renold Chain India Private Limited) . Renold Power Transmission Limited, Renold International Holdings Limited and Renold Europe Limited are 
registered in England and Wales.

The Group has the following interests in the exceptions noted above:

Subsidiary undertaking
Renold Chain India Private Limited

Our overseas companies are incorporated in the countries in which they operate except where otherwise stated.

Equity 
shares

Voting 
rights

75%

75%

www.renold.com Stock code: RNO

Renold 2019-AR.indd   149

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

149

22/08/2019   17:28:57

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Corporate Information

Registered number: 249688 
Telephone: +44 (0)161 498 4500 
Fax: +44 (0)161 437 7782 
Email: enquiry@renold.com 
Website: www.renold.com

Registered office
Trident 2, Trident Business Park 
Styal Road 
Wythenshawe 
Manchester 
M22 5XB 

Auditor
Deloitte LLP

Broker and financial adviser
Peel Hunt LLP

Financial PR consultants
Instinctif Partners Limited

Registrars
Link Asset Services 
34 Beckenham Road 
Beckenham 
Kent 
BR3 4TU

Telephone: If calling from the UK: 0371 664 0300 (lines are open 9.00 am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday)

If calling from overseas: +44 371 664 0300

Email: www.signalshares.com/help-centre/

Website: www.signalshares.com

If you receive two or more copies of this report please write to Link Asset Services, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU and ask for 
your accounts to be amalgamated.

150

Renold plc Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019

Renold 2019-AR.indd   150

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:28 pm 

  Proof 4

22/08/2019   17:28:57

This Annual Report is printed by an FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council) 
certified printer using vegetable-based inks.

This report has been printed on Magno silk, a white coated paper and 
board using 100% EFC pulp.

Renold 2019-AR.indd   6

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 5

22/08/2019   17:27:54

R

e

n

o

l

d

p

l

c

A

n

n

u

a

l

R

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

A

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

f

o

r

t

h

e

y

e

a

r

e

n

d

e

d

3

1

M

a

r

c

h

2

0

1

9

Renold plc 
Trident 2 
Trident Business Park 
Styal Road 
Wythenshawe 
Manchester 
M22 5XB

Telephone: +44 (0)161 498 4500
www.renold.com

Renold 2019-AR.indd   1

26945 

  22 August 2019 5:26 pm 

  Proof 5

22/08/2019   17:27:51