Quarterlytics / Technology / Hardware, Equipment & Parts / Renishaw

Renishaw

rsw · LSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker rsw
Exchange LSE
Sector Technology
Industry Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Renishaw
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

1

6

Annual report and accounts 2016

 
 
 
 
 Our products are working behind the scenes, 

in more industries than you think... 

Contents

Strategic report 
01 

Introduction 

02  At a glance 

04  Chairman’s statement 

42  Performance – Healthcare 

44  Performance – Financial review 

48  Risk and risk management 

50  Principal risks and uncertainties 

Financial statements 
94  Consolidated income statement

95 

 Consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income and expense

08 

 Additive manufacturing for custom solutions 

52  Corporate social responsibility 

96 

 Consolidated balance sheet

54  Our strategy in action – People 

97  Consolidated statement of changes in equity

62  The power generation market 

98  Consolidated statement of cash flow

09  Our business model

10  Our markets 

12 

 Our business sectors – Metrology 

14  The aerospace market

16  The automotive market

Governance 
Introduction 
64 

66  Board of directors and company secretary

18 

 Our business sectors – Healthcare 

68  Executive Board

69 

International Sales and Marketing Board

70  Directors’ corporate governance report

76  Nomination Committee report

77  Audit Committee report

80 

 Directors’ remuneration report

87  Other statutory and regulatory disclosures 

90  Directors’ responsibilities 

91 

Independent auditor’s report

20  The healthcare market

22  Our strategy 

23  Key performance indicators

24  Our strategy in action 

26 

28 

30 

32 

 Our strategy in action  
– Focus on delivering solutions 

 Our strategy in action  
– Global customer support 

 Our strategy in action  
– Efficient high-quality manufacturing 

 Our strategy in action  
– Continual research creating strong 
market positions with innovative products 

34  Performance – Overview 

36  Performance – Metrology 

38  The consumer products market

40  The construction market

99 

 Notes (forming part of the 
financial statements)

121   Company balance sheet

122   Company statement of changes in equity

123   Notes to the Company financial statements

Shareholder information
134  10 year financial record 

135  Shareholder information

136  Shareholder notes

01

Applying innovation to a range of our markets

Construction see pages 40–41

Consumer products see pages 38–39

Power generation see pages 62–63

Automotive see pages 16–17

Aerospace see pages 14–15

Healthcare see pages 20–21 

Introduction

Renishaw is a world-leading metrology company.
With our highly experienced team, we are confidently driving 
our future growth through innovative and patented products and 
processes, efficient high-quality manufacturing, and the ability to 
provide local support in a growing number of geographies and 
markets. 95% of our sales are outside the UK.
Our continuing investment in new product development, plant and 
equipment, and facilities (c.£100m in the last year) is the key to 
our confidence in the Group’s long-term strategy and prospects. 
With 4,286 skilled and motivated people, we continue to be at the 
leading edge of technological innovation.

For more information visit: 
www.renishaw.com

All dates within this document refer to 
financial years unless stated otherwise.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report02

At a glance

2016

in numbers

Who we are 
Renishaw is a world-leading metrology 
company operating in two key business 
areas, metrology and healthcare.

The Group has 79 locations in 35 
countries from where we distribute and 
support products for our global customer 
base, with 95% of sales outside the UK.

We manufacture our products in the UK, 
Ireland, India, Germany, USA and France.

What we do 
Metrology products:

Our technology solutions help 
manufacturers to maximise production 
output, to significantly reduce the 
time taken to produce and inspect 
components, and to keep their machines 
running reliably. In the fields of industrial 
automation and motion systems, our 
high-quality position measurement and 
calibration systems allow machine builders 
to manufacture highly accurate and 
reliable products.

Healthcare products:

Our technologies are helping within 
applications such as craniomaxillofacial 
surgery, dentistry, neurosurgery, chemical 
analysis and nanotechnology research. 
These include engineering solutions for 
stereotactic neurosurgery, diagnosis of 
infectious diseases, analytical tools that 
identify and characterise the chemistry 
and structure of materials, supply of 
implants to hospitals and specialist design 
centres for craniomaxillofacial surgery, and 
products and services that allow dental 
laboratories to manufacture high-quality 
dental restorations.

£436.6m

£80.0m

Revenue

Profit before tax

US office near Chicago

Renishaw, Inc. to be 
consolidated into one new  
133,000 sq ft facility

North and South America 
Locations  
11
Metrology revenue
£87.4m

Healthcare revenue
£4.8m

 Indicates Renishaw Group locations

 Metrology 

 Healthcare

95%

5%

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201603

48.0p

Total dividend for the year

4,286

Number of employees 
as at 30th June 2016

1,500+

Patents – continual innovation
in new technologies

Miskin, UK
460,000 sq ft  
site is now fully refurbished 
and 60% occupied

Taiwan office

relocated to larger  
14,800 sq ft facility

India

New Solutions Centre

UK and Ireland 
Locations  
15
Metrology revenue
£18.5m

Healthcare revenue
£4.7m

Continental Europe
Locations  
20
Metrology revenue
£103.1m

Healthcare revenue
£9.0m

Other regions
Locations  
9
Metrology revenue
£11.6m

Healthcare revenue
£2.2m

Far East 
Locations  
24
Metrology revenue
£187.6m

Healthcare revenue
£7.7m

80%

20% 92%

8%

84%

16% 96%

4%

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report04

Chairman’s statement

 I am pleased to report our 2016 annual results, with 
revenue for the year ended 30th June 2016 of £436.6m 
compared to £494.7m for last year. The Group’s profit before 

tax for the year was £80.0m. 

Sir David R McMurtry, Chairman and Chief Executive

I am pleased to report our 2016 annual 
results, with revenue for the year ended 
30th June 2016 of £436.6m compared 
to £494.7m for last year. As highlighted 
in our Interim results, we had a number 
of large orders from Far East customers 
in the consumer electronics markets 
during the previous year which generated 
exceptional growth in our metrology 
business sector. Adjusting for these large 
orders and restating revenue at last year’s 
exchange rates resulted in an underlying 
revenue growth of 4% for the year and 
6% at actual exchange rates.

Geographically, revenue in the Far East 
was £195.3m compared to £257.7m 
last year, but with an underlying growth 
of 12% when excluding the large orders. 
Revenue in Europe was £112.1m 
(2015: £103.1m), in the Americas was 
£92.2m (2015: £96.3m) and in the UK 
was £23.2m (2015: £25.5m). 

The Group’s profit before tax for the year 
was £80.0m compared to £144.2m 
last year. 

£87.4m (2015: £89.4m), in Europe was 
£103.1m (2015: £96.2m) and in the UK 
was £18.5m (2015: £20.7m).

This year’s tax charge amounts to £11.5m 
(2015: £22.8m) representing a tax rate of 
14.3% (2015: 15.8%). The tax rate has 
benefited from the continued phasing in 
of the patent box tax regime, the research 
and development tax credit and a further 
reduction in the UK corporation tax rate.

Earnings per share were 94.9p compared 
to 167.5p last year. 

Metrology
Revenue from our metrology business 
for the year was £408.2m compared to 
£467.0m last year.

Revenue in the Far East was £187.6m 
compared to £249.9m last year, a 
decrease of 25%, but an underlying 
increase of 13% after excluding the large 
orders. Revenue in the Americas was 

There was good growth in our 
measurement automation, additive 
manufacturing (AM) and encoder 
products lines.

Operating profit for our metrology 
business was £85.9m (2015: £150.7m). 

We have continued to invest in research 
and development, with total engineering 
costs in this business segment of £60.1m 
net of capitalised costs (2015: £55.0m) 
and a number of new product launches 
during the year. The CMM products line 
launched both REVO-2, a new version 
of the REVO® multi-sensor 5-axis 
measurement system with a vision probe 
option, and MODUS 2™, a new CMM 
metrology software package. Our spatial 
measurements products line launched 
Merlin, a marine surveying system. 

2016 performance

Revenue (£m)

Operating profit (£m)

Profit before tax (£m)

Earnings per share (pence)

Dividend per share (pence)

2016

2015

Change

436.6

494.7

79.5

80.0

94.9

48.0

143.9

144.2

167.5

46.5

-12%

-45%

-44%

-43%

+3%

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201605

New RenAM 500M additive manufacturing 
system for volume production.

Open day in the Renishaw Innovation 
Centre attended by 1,100 people.

now been approved for sale in Australia.
In our medical dental products line we 
increased sales of AM machines for the 
manufacture of dental products and 
maxillofacial and cranial products. 

In our spectroscopy products line, we 
introduced the inVia Qontor confocal 
Raman microscope, with the addition of 
Renishaw’s latest innovation, LiveTrack™ 
focus tracking technology, which enables 
users to analyse samples with uneven, 
curved or rough surfaces. 

There was an operating loss of £6.4m, 
compared to a loss of £6.8m last year. 
We remain focused on moving this 
business sector into profit.

In relation to the AM products line we 
launched the AM400, demonstrated 
the RenAM 500M and established 
four innovative AM solution centres to 
support the adoption of AM technology 
in volume production.

Healthcare
Revenue from our healthcare business 
for the year was £28.4m, an increase 
of 3% over the £27.7m last year. 
We experienced growth in our medical 
dental and neurological products lines.

Healthcare also saw continued investment 
in research and development, with 
total engineering costs in this business 
segment of £9.0m net of capitalised costs 
(2015: £8.3m).

We have continued to expand the market 
for our neuromate® surgical robot, 
including sales in the UK and Spain, along 
with our neuroinspire™ surgical planning 
software. Our neuroinspire™ software has 

Continued investment for  
long-term growth
The Group continues its strategy to 
invest for the long-term, expanding 
our global marketing and distribution 
infrastructure, along with increasing 
manufacturing capacity and research and 
development activities. During the year, 
we established new sales and marketing 
subsidiary companies in Denmark, Finland 
and Hungary.

Our workforce at the end of June 2016 
was 4,286, an increase of 174, of which 
106 were apprentices and graduates 
taken on as part of our on-going aim and 
commitment to train and develop skilled 
resource for the Group in the future. 

Capital expenditure on property, plant 
and equipment for the year was £53.0m, 
of which £17.4m was spent on property 
and £35.6m on plant and equipment. 
New premises for our USA headquarters 
near Chicago are nearing completion.

Financial highlights

Revenue (£m)

494.7

436.6

355.5

346.9

331.9

Adjusted profit  
before tax (£m)

144.2

80.0

Adjusted earnings 
per share (pence)

Dividend per 
share (pence)

167.5

94.9

48.0

46.5

41.2

40.0

38.5

86.0

79.2

70.1

95.6

88.9

82.3

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report06

Investor communications
In line with our commitment to improve 
investor communications, our third 
investor day was held on 12th May 2016, 
for existing and potential new investors. 
This involved presentations on group 
strategy, business segments and product 
lines, given by members of the Board 
and senior management, as well as tours 
covering the Group’s activities and various 
Q&A sessions. The event was again well 
attended and gives shareholders another 
opportunity, in addition to the AGM and 
half-year and year-end webcasts, to 
learn more about Renishaw’s business 
and strategy.

Merlin is a new dedicated time-tagged 
marine laser scanning system.

Chairman’s statement (continued)

In the UK, the refurbishment of the 
remaining half of the facility at Miskin, 
South Wales, was completed and 
incorporates product display, training, 
research and development areas and a 
Healthcare Centre of Excellence. Also at 
Miskin we obtained planning consent 
for 1.74m sq ft building development 
at the site. 

Also at board level, Kath Durrant took 
on the role of Chair of the Remuneration 
Committee. This role was previously 
held by Sir David Grant, our senior 
independent director, who we are 
delighted to congratulate on his 
knighthood in the Queen’s Birthday 
Honours 2016 for his contribution to 
engineering, technology and education.

Working capital
Group inventory increased from £77.7m 
at the start of the year to £95.0m, as we 
continued our policy of holding sufficient 
finished inventory to ensure customer 
delivery performance, given our short 
order book of approximately five weeks. 
Trade debtors increased from £101.2m 
to £114.9m, with debtor days outstanding 
at the end of the current year at 70 days 
(2015: 67 days).

Net cash balances at 30th June 2016 
were £21.3m, compared to £82.2m 
at 30th June 2015. Additionally, there 
is an escrow account of £15.3m 
(2015: £14.7m) relating to the provision 
of security to the UK defined benefit 
pension scheme. The lower cash balance 
reflects the high capital expenditure 
during the year, along with higher working 
capital demands.

Directors and employees
During the year we have made 
several changes at Board and senior 
management level to enhance the 
operations of the business. Will Lee, 
formerly the head of our machine tool 
products line and laser and calibration 
products line, was appointed as Director 
of Sales and Marketing to support Ben 
Taylor in the transition to his retirement 
from the Board at the end of July this year. 
I am now delighted to announce that Will 
is to be appointed to the Board as Group 
Sales and Marketing Director with effect 
from 1st August 2016.

I would like to take this opportunity to 
thank Ben for his outstanding contribution 
to the Group’s performance over the last 
31 years. Ben has helped me to articulate 
the vision for Renishaw and has been 
a partner in developing long-standing 
relationships with customers worldwide. 
He will be missed by all within the Group, 
both personally and professionally. 
We wish him well in his retirement. 

We have reviewed the management of our 
overseas sales operations and appointed 
Leo Somerville as President – Renishaw 
North America to oversee our sales 
subsidiaries in Canada, USA and Mexico 
and Howard Salt as President – Renishaw 
Inc. our principal USA sales subsidiary. 
These new appointments will provide 
strategic focus to our sales activities 
in these regions.

The directors would also like to thank 
employees for their invaluable support 
and contribution during the year.

UK defined benefit pension 
scheme
The Company and the trustees of the 
UK defined benefit pension scheme 
have entered into a funding agreement 
to conclude the latest triennial valuation 
of the fund as at 30th September 2015. 
This agreement came into effect on 30th 
June 2016 and provides for a 15-year 
recovery plan under which the Company 
will pay member pensions, retirement 
lump sums and transfer payments (up to 
£1m per annum) over this period. 

In addition, the Company has provided 
security over UK property to the value of 
£62m, and the fund will retain the cash 
held in an escrow account providing 
further security for a period of six years, 
over which time this escrow account will 
be scaled back to zero.

The Company and the trustees have 
agreed a higher funding target than 
agreed previously in order to make the 
fund self-sufficient over the 15-year 
period (or earlier, if achieved in the 
meantime) and will measure this at each 
triennial actuarial valuation. The funding 
agreement has been submitted to The 
Pensions Regulator.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201607

RVP is a new vision measurement 
probe for use with the REVO® 5-axis 
measurement system.

The 2016 Investor Day was held at our 
Miskin site in South Wales.

Brexit
Whilst the full business implications of Brexit 
remain uncertain, and will do for some 
time, the Board believes the Group to be 
well positioned to react to the potential 
challenges and opportunities ahead. 
The Group has a strong presence in the 
EU, which this year comprised 23% of our 
revenue, with a number of subsidiaries 
performing a range of functions including 
sales, marketing and distribution, research 
and development and manufacturing. 
We believe this infrastructure will assist the 
Group in its planning for and response to 
changes in trading arrangements between 
the UK and the EU. Our risk committee 
will be assessing all potential impacts and 
putting in place strategies and actions, 
both in the shorter-term whilst the UK 
government negotiates the UK’s exit from 
the EU and in the longer-term as the 
UK’s trading arrangements with the EU 
become clearer.

Outlook
The Group continues to invest in the 
development of new products and 
applications, along with targeted 
investment in production, and sales and 
marketing facilities around the world. 
Despite current uncertainty surrounding 
Brexit and significant fluctuations in 
currency exchange rates, your directors 
remain confident in the long-term 
prospects for the Group and currently 
anticipate growth in both revenue and 
profits over the next financial year. 

Dividend
A final dividend of 35.5p net per share 
will be paid on 17th October 2016, 
to shareholders on the register on 
16th September 2016, giving a total 
dividend of 48.0p for the year, an increase 
of 3.2% over last year’s 46.5p.

Sir David R McMurtry 
CDE, RDI, FRS, FREng, CEng, FIMechE 
Chairman and Chief Executive
27th July 2016

The new inVia Qontor is Renishaw's 
most advanced Raman microscope.

Opening of new Additive Manufacturing 
Solutions Centre in Pune, India.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report08

Additive manufacturing for custom solutions 

“ People often say ‘we couldn’t 
have done it without you’, but 
the fact is Robot Bike Co really 
couldn’t have got to where 
it is today without the help 
and expertise that Renishaw 
provided us with, and for that 
we are hugely appreciative.”

Ed Haythornthwaite, CEO, Robot Bike Co  
(manufacturer of the world’s first fully  
customisable carbon fibre mountain bike frame).

  For further information on Renishaw’s additive manufacturing 
solutions please see the case study on pages 26–27 and more 
information on our website.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201609

Our business model

We identify customer needs, and then apply 
innovative engineering to deliver successful solutions.

1. Customer needs
•  We anticipate future trends and seek to solve problems  

before they appear to be happening.

•  All areas of our organisation work in partnership with their 

customers to understand and solve their customers’ current 
and anticipated real-life problems.

2. Innovative engineering 
•  Renishaw’s strategy of investment in R&D and engineering 
skills enables us to take a longer-term view of the viability  
of new technologies.

•  We are actively expanding our significant portfolio 

of innovative and patented products.

•  We provide solutions that drive efficiency and  

reduce costs.

Driving sustainable growth  
and shareholder return

4

Customer  
needs

1

Innovative  
engineering 

2

3

Successful 
solutions 

3. Successful solutions 
•  We are a highly vertically integrated company so that we can 
ensure success for our customers. We not only undertake 
design of innovative products, we also manufacture and 
sell them through our wholly-owned manufacturing and 
sales organisations. 

4.  Driving sustainable growth and 

shareholder return

•  Our ordinary dividend, funded from our annual cash flows, 

is the primary form of shareholder return. We have increased 
the ordinary dividend per share by over 20% over the 
last three years. We aim to maintain a progressive and 
sustainable dividend policy.

  Key performance indicators 
Our key performance indicators are shown on page 23.

  Risks and uncertainties 
Information on the risks associated with our business and how we 
manage them is contained on pages 48 to 51.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report10

Our markets

We develop innovative products that significantly 
advance our customers' operational performance – 
from improving manufacturing efficiencies and raising 
product quality, to maximising research capabilities 
and improving the efficacy of medical procedures.

Our products serve truly diverse markets 
across a wide range of industries, 
customer types and geographic regions. 
From the manufacture of jet engines 
and wind turbines, through to dentistry 
and brain surgery, our products, and our 
people who service them, are making a 
real difference to the capabilities of our 
manufacturing and healthcare clients. 
These benefits are extended to the end 
consumer of our clients’ products and 
services, whether using a smartphone, 
driving a car, riding a mountain bike, or 
having a new dental crown fitted, many 
of these products rely on Renishaw’s 
technology and applications expertise.

As Sir David McMurtry has said, “We are 
confident that there are not many modern-
day planes, trains or automobiles in the 
world that have not been touched in some 
way by Renishaw products.”

On these two pages we have listed 
some of our principal markets and the 
specific key drivers of growth within those 
markets, for our products. However, there 
are more generic market growth drivers 
that are positive for our business:

•  Global skills shortages – increased 

investments in automation and user-
friendly technology.

•  Rising energy costs – increased 

demand for products that 
maximise output.

•  Focus on reducing emissions and 

waste – increased demand for high 
performance products with ever tighter 
manufacturing tolerances and products 
that help minimise waste and re-work.

•  Population growth and rising incomes 

– increased consumption in our 
principal markets.

•  Life expectancy rising globally – 

increased demand for healthcare 
products and continuing demand for 
consumer products.

We are also increasingly spreading 
risk through the diversification of our 
applications for product lines, our 
customer base and our routes to market.

Renishaw’s business has transitioned 
over recent years from primarily being a 
supplier of products to capital equipment 
manufacturers, to becoming much more 
focused on delivering a full solution directly 
to end-users. Our experience in our core 
product lines, which has highlighted that 
our global customers need assistance in 
solving their problems, is being carried 
across into our newer offerings.

Today, many of our products lines 
including measurement and automation, 
additive manufacturing and healthcare 
lines are primarily sold direct to the 
end-user. This helps to build brand 
loyalty and open up new revenue 
opportunities including hardware and 
software upgrades, the cross-selling 
of complementary products and 
maintenance contracts. 

Our business focus is to provide 
solutions for our customers across these 
highlighted markets and to be seen as 
a trusted technology partner meeting 
their needs.

Automotive 

Continuing investment in 
manufacturing capacity 
to meet growing global 
demand. Improved fuel 
efficiency requires tighter 
tolerances on powertrain 
components. Cost 
efficiencies and automated 
processes required 
throughout the supply chain.

See pages 16–17

Power generation

Manufacture of components 
for civil nuclear, wind and 
solar energy. Increasing 
focus on maximising output 
from machinery used in 
power generation. Increasing 
research into energy storage.

See pages 62–63

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201611

Agriculture

Increasing global demand 
for food products from 
developing nations. Increasing 
global demand for biofuels. 
Greater investment in 
machinery for intensive 
farming capabilities.

Healthcare

Neurological disorders 
require highly precise 
surgical therapies. Growing 
demand for cosmetic dentistry 
with superior aesthetics. 
Need to rapidly diagnose 
infectious diseases for faster, 
more specific treatments. 
Growing demand for patient-
specific implants.

See pages 20–21

Aerospace 

New aircraft production 
to meet growing global 
demand for civil air transport. 
New fuel-efficient engines with 
complex parts requiring faster 
measurement. Improvements 
to fuel efficiency by 
minimising airframe weight.

See pages 14–15

Consumer products 

Ever shorter product life 
cycles require flexible 
manufacturing systems. 
New generations of electronic 
devices demand precision 
manufacturing systems for 
form and function.

See pages 38–39

Construction 

Major infrastructure projects 
driving heavy equipment 
sales. Skills shortages 
requiring more automation in 
equipment manufacturers.

See pages 40–41

Resource exploration 

Equipment manufactured 
to stringent safety 
requirements requires 
accurate, cost-effective 
and traceable processes. 
Non-renewable resources 
require exploration in 
demanding terrains and 
appropriate surveying tools. 
Global population growth and 
urbanisation drive long-term 
demand for fossil fuels.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report12

Our business sectors – Metrology

Our metrology products help 
manufacturers to maximise production 
output, significantly reduce the 
time taken to produce and inspect 
components, and keep their machines 
running reliably. In the fields of 
industrial automation and motion 
systems, our position measurement 
and calibration systems allow machine 
builders to manufacture highly accurate 
and reliable products. 

Metrology revenue (-13%)

£408.2m

Metrology operating profit (-43%)

£85.9m

Percentage of group revenue

93%

Equator™ gauge integrated within 
a robot-loaded manufacturing cell.

Machine tool probe system for  
on-machine measurement.

Precision styli ensure accurate 
acquisition of measurement data.

Laser calibration system being used to 
test positioning accuracy of a rotary axis.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201613

Incremental encoder for rotary motion 
control on an air-bearing stage.

Modular fixtures are used to hold parts 
securely for dimensional inspection.

Prototype manifold produced by a 
vacuum casting machine.

The product range 
includes the following:

Co-ordinate measuring 
machine (CMM) products
Sensors, software and control systems for 
three-dimensional CMMs, including touch-
trigger and scanning probes, automated 
probe changers, motorised indexing 
probe heads and 5-axis measurement 
systems, which enable the highly 
accurate measurement of manufactured 
components and finished assemblies.

Machine tool probe systems
Sensors and software for computer 
numerically controlled (CNC) metal-cutting 
machine tools that allow the automation 
of setting and on-machine measurement 
operations, leading to more productivity 
from existing machines and reductions in 
scrap and rework. These include laser tool 
setters, contact tool setters, tool breakage 
detectors, touch probes, contact 
scanning systems and high-accuracy 
inspection probes.

Styli for probe systems
Precision styli that attach to probe sensors 
for CMMs, machine tools and EquatorTM 
gauging systems to ensure that accurate 
measurement data is acquired at the point 
of contact.

Performance testing products
Calibration and testing products to 
determine the positioning accuracy of 
a wide range of industrial and scientific 
machinery to international standards, 
including a laser interferometer, rotary axis 
calibrator, wireless telescoping ballbar and 
software for data capture and analysis.

Gauging
EquatorTM enables process control by 
delivering highly repeatable, thermally 
insensitive, versatile and reprogrammable 
gauging to the shop floor, both as 
a standalone device and as part of 
an automated manufacturing cell. 
Combined with INTUOTM software, 
Equator is also an ideal alternative to 
traditional manual gauging, with training 
in a few hours, allowing engineers to 
program parts in minutes.

Spatial measurement
High-speed laser measurement and 
surveying systems for use in extreme 
environments, such as mine and quarry 
surveying, marine positioning and 
mobile mapping.

Fixtures
Modular and custom fixtures used to hold 
parts securely for dimensional inspection 
on CMM, vision and gauging systems.

Position encoders
Position encoders that ensure 
accurate linear and rotary motion 
control in a wide range of applications 
from electronics, flat panel displays, 
robotics and semiconductors to 
medical, precision machining and print 
production. These include magnetic 
encoders, incremental optical encoders, 
absolute optical encoders and laser 
interferometer encoders.

Additive manufacturing (AM)
Advanced metal AM systems for direct 
manufacturing of 3D-printed metallic 
components. A total solution is offered 
from systems, materials, ancillaries and 
software through to consultancy, training 
and support for a range of industries 
including industrial, healthcare and 
mould tooling.

Vacuum casting
Vacuum casting machines from entry-level 
to high capacity for rapid prototyping and 
production of polymer end-use parts.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report14

The aerospace market

Equator gauging system is used at 
Renishaw’s customer, High-Tech 
Engineering to inspect aerospace 
components.

Applied innovation to the aerospace market

Air travel popularity continues 
to grow, especially in Asia, and 
demand for passenger aircraft 
is higher than ever as a result. 
The 2015 Boeing Global Market 
Forecast sees the commercial fleet 
doubling by 2034, with 58% of the 
38,000 new aircraft required to 
accommodate growth. New fuel-
efficient engines with complex 
parts require faster measurement, 
whilst there is also a drive to 
minimise airframe weight to further 
aid fuel efficiency.

Gauging success
High-Tech Engineering, a precision 
engineering company based in Dunstable, 
Bedfordshire, UK, has always focused 
on the quality of the parts it produces. 
Started in 1985, High-Tech built a 
reputation in the motorsport industry for 
delivering high-quality machined parts. 
The company has since moved into the 
aerospace market and gained some key 
industry approvals, including becoming 

a preferred supplier to leading UK 
aerospace companies. Recently  
High-Tech won a contract to produce 
precision-milled titanium parts for a large 
aerospace customer. Due to the nature 
of the parts, High-Tech was instructed 
to carry out 100% part inspection, and 
for this requirement, Hi-Tech is using a 
Renishaw Equator™ gauging system for 
one particularly complex component.

The Equator system works by comparing 
the manufactured parts against a 
matching master part, gauging all the 
features in a single operation with an 
immediate pass/fail decision, along with 
a report of the component dimensions. 
High-Tech has also managed to reduce 
the cost of producing the aerospace part 
by 27%. This has had a real impact on the 
competitiveness of this type of production, 
allowing the company to make the 
same precision quality parts, whilst also 
delivering better value to its customers.

Around 150 features on the part are 
inspected by the Equator system, 
including a number of bores, thicknesses 

Typical parts manufactured by  
High-Tech Engineering.

Renishaw's Equator is a highly repeatable 
and versatile shop floor gauging system.

and form measurements, with typical 
tolerances of plus or minus 25 microns. 
The Equator does this within 10 minutes, 
and well within the production 
requirements, far less than the machining 
time. This is almost a 50% reduction 
in cycle time compared to running the 
program on High-Tech’s co-ordinate 
measuring machines.

The Equator is fully programmable 
and can be used on multiple parts, 
meaning High-Tech can perform highly 
repeatable and rapid automated routines 
across numerous contracts, resulting in 
significantly reduced labour costs.

Following the success of High-Tech’s 
manufacturing cell, the company plans to 
use Equator as part of future cells they will 
be commissioning for jobs in the pipeline. 
According to High-Tech’s Managing 
Director, Steve Tickner, “Since we started 
using Equator we have not made a single 
bad part. When you find something which 
helps you make a perfect part every 
time, reduces manpower commitments, 
reduces overall costs and doesn’t cost 
a fortune itself, it’s a winning solution”.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201615

Aircraft are highly complex 
structures and key assemblies, 
from engines and wings to 
control systems and landing gear, 
all rely on Renishaw products 
for process control and post-
process inspection during their 
manufacture. This illustration 
of a typical passenger aircraft 
highlights a few key applications 
for our products. 

Landing gear components 
Precision machining of high-value materials 
uses on-machine probing to eliminate costly 
scrap in the production of undercarriage 
and landing gear equipment.

Advanced manufacture of control 
surfaces 
Adaptive machining relies on probing 
technology and advanced software  
to enable the economic production  
of aircraft control surfaces (e.g. flaps and 
rudders) with complex geometries.

Control systems and actuators 
Fluid power componentry, including control 
valves and actuators, benefit from metal 
additive manufacturing which enables part 
consolidation, functional improvements and 
significant weight reductions.

Quiet and efficient aero engines
Scanning technology for machine tools 
and inspection equipment benefits the 
production and maintenance of a broad 
range of engine components, including 
the adaptive machining and precision 
inspection of blades.

Wings and wing spars
Long-range laser encoders provide the 
accuracy required for large-scale machining 
of composite wing skins whilst on-machine 
probing systems enable efficient production 
of wing spars and other machined 
components.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report16

The automotive market

Improving quality and throughput

Worldwide demand for vehicles 
continues to grow and there is 
increasing focus on fuel efficiency 
and emissions control from 
both domestic and commercial 
transport. There is also an 
increasing need to produce 
extremely accurate and reliable 
manufacturing systems, with 
a trend towards automated 
manufacturing processes to 
reduce cycle times.

Applying additive technology 
to automotive production
Katcon, based in Nuevo Leó, Mexico, is 
a manufacturer of catalytic converters, 
treatment devices and exhaust modules 
for diesel and for gasoline systems, all 
designed to protect the environment from 
vehicle emissions. Katcon decided to 
adopt additive manufacturing (3D printing) 
technology to speed up and improve their 
processes to develop components.

The company believes that metal 3D 
printing allows more design freedom; 
it is ideal for producing prototypes and it 
is also more efficient for the production 
of parts that are currently very costly due 
to the multiple processes involved in their 
manufacture. After investigating available 
additive manufacturing systems, Katcon 
chose Renishaw’s AM 250 additive 
manufacturing system. Alberto Serna, 
Tooling Engineer at Katcon explains, 
“The advantage we have with the additive 
technology is that we design in a free 
space, in a free volume, and we generate 
our welding fixtures. Compared to the 
normal process of machining which can 
take up to four to five weeks, we have 
been able to reduce the time to 36 hours 
depending on the complexity of the 
design. We are offering in some scenarios 
a lower cost at a higher speed.”

Katcon, Mexico, produces automotive 
parts using a Renishaw additive 
manufacturing system.

A Renishaw RMP60 touch probe 
measuring an alloy wheel at SAI.

Dr Henry Shih, CEO of automotive supplier 
SuperAlloy Industrial Company (SAI).

Driving down re-work 
and scrap
Another company benefiting from 
Renishaw’s technology within the 
automotive industry is Taiwanese 
manufacturer SuperAlloy Industrial 
Company Ltd (SAI). The company is a 
supplier of high-quality lightweight forged 
metal products. They produce more 
than 200 types of wheel and have 600 
CNC machine tools working on wheel 
rim production.

In order to increase production precision 
and reduce scrap, SAI equipped the 
relevant lathes with Renishaw OLP40 
touch probes. The CNC milling machines 
were equipped with RMP60 machine tool 
probes which measure workpiece position 
as well as providing in-line key dimension 
detection, thereby increasing production 
performance. The OLP40 systems allow 
SAI to carry out in-process measurement 
control to improve cutting and efficiency 
for surface precision processing after 
coating. Even more importantly, it reduces 
rework by 80%.

Dr Shih says, “When we choose suppliers, 
we don’t just look at the price of the 
product; we also attach a great deal of 
value to their R&D capabilities and service. 
Renishaw has an excellent reputation 
in manufacturing industries, and also 
provides service for different industries, 
so it doesn’t just offer a product or a 
solution, but also shares with us its 
experience, expertise and the industry’s 
best practices.”

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201617

The majority of key 
components on domestic 
and commercial vehicles 
are subject to process 
control using Renishaw 
products. This illustration 
highlights just a few 
key applications for our 
products relating to a 
typical car. 

Latest engine technology 
From camshaft manufacture to quality 
control of valve seats, probing systems 
enable modern engines to deliver enhanced 
performance, higher reliability and reduced 
emissions.

Body panels and components 
Automated production lines rely on 
indexable and scanning probe systems for 
checking car bodies (known as Body in 
White) prior to painting and assembly.

Precision gears and reliable gearbox 
components 
High-volume precision machining and 
rapid part inspection necessary to support 
automotive gearbox and drivetrain 
production are made possible with process 
control and gauging technologies.

Suspension and braking components 
Systems which enable automation and the 
quality control of parts on the shop floor are 
paramount for the economic production of 
high-quality components in the volumes 
required by the automotive industry.

Wheels
Alloy wheel manufacture requires highly 
productive precision machining which can 
adapt to the variation inherent in forging 
processes. On-machine probing systems 
ensure productivity through automated 
process control.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report18

Our business sectors – Healthcare

Our technologies are helping within 
applications such as craniomaxillofacial 
surgery, dentistry, neurosurgery, chemical 
analysis and nanotechnology research. 
These include engineering solutions for 
stereotactic neurosurgery, diagnosis of 
infectious diseases, analytical tools that 
identify and characterise the chemistry 
and structure of materials, the supply 
of implants to hospitals and specialist 
design centres for craniomaxillofacial 
surgery, and products and services that 
allow dental laboratories to manufacture 
high-quality dental restorations. 

Healthcare revenue (+3%)

£28.4m

Healthcare operating loss

£6.4m

Percentage of group revenue

7%

Neuroinspire software is used in the 
planning of stereotactic neurosurgery.

The neuromate stereotactic robot is used for a 
range of functional neurosurgical procedures.

inVia Raman microscope integrated with 
a Bruker atomic force microscope.

RenDx SP-2000 used to process a diagnostic 
assay for infectious disease diagnosis.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201619

Support for a dental laboratory using 
Renishaw’s dental CAD software.

Titanium craniomaxillofacial implants 
produced using a Renishaw metal 
additive manufacturing system.

DS30 blue light dental scanner 
and accessories.

Hybrid Raman systems
Renishaw’s hybrid systems unite the 
chemical analysis power of Raman 
spectroscopy with the high spatial 
resolution of other techniques, 
such as atomic force microscopy 
and scanning electron microscopy. 
These new instruments are vital tools 
for investigating materials and devices 
for nanotechnology applications.

Turn-key Raman analysis
The RA800 benchtop platform provides 
companies with a high-performance 
chemical imaging and analysis system 
that can be tailored for the needs of their 
customers. RA800 gives research-grade 
Raman microscopy performance in a 
Class 1 laser-safe, simple-to-use form.

Diagnostic systems
Renishaw Diagnostics Limited has 
developed the RenDx Multiplex Assay 
System, an automated, multiplex platform 
for clinical diagnosis of infectious disease, 
and has CE certification for the platform 
and its first assay, Fungiplex, for diagnosis 
of invasive fungal infections.

The product range 
includes the following:

Dental scanners
3D contact scanners and non-contact 
optical scanners used for digitising of 
dental preparations and the measurement 
of implant locations for tooth-supported 
frameworks and custom abutments.

Dental computer-aided design 
(CAD) software
Dental CAD software that allows set-up of 
scanning routines and enables laboratory 
staff to design abutments and structures 
for crowns and bridges, including powerful 
anatomic design functions.

Dental structures manufacturing 
service
A central manufacturing service that can 
handle CAD files from a wide variety 
of dental CAD systems to produce 
structures for crowns and bridges in 
zirconia, cobalt chrome, PMMA (used 
for temporary restorations) and wax, 
and abutments in cobalt chrome.

Craniomaxillofacial custom-
made implants
Additively manufactured from titanium, 
custom-made craniomaxillofacial implants 
are structural implants that are used in the 
reconstruction of a patient’s head, face or 
jaw. These are most commonly required 
after oncology treatment or as a result 
of trauma.

Neurosurgical robot
A stereotactic robot that provides a 
platform solution for a broad range of 
functional neurosurgical procedures 
including deep brain stimulation 
(DBS), stereoelectroencephalography 
(SEEG), neuroendoscopy and 
stereotactic biopsies, and is being 
used within the context of clinical trials 
for both neurosurgical disorders and 
brain oncology.

Neurosurgical planning 
software
Software that allows advanced 
planning of targets and trajectories for 
stereotactic neurosurgery.

Neurosurgical implants
Implantable devices that allow surgeons 
to verify expected DBS electrode 
position relative to targeted anatomy 
using magnetic resonance imaging 
(MRI) for the treatment of Parkinson’s 
disease, other movement disorders 
and neuropathic pain.

Neurosurgical accessories
Specialist electrodes and instruments 
for use in epilepsy neurosurgery, 
manufactured by DIXI Medical.

Raman microscopes
Scientists and engineers worldwide use 
Renishaw’s research-grade inVia Raman 
microscope for the non-destructive 
chemical analysis and imaging of 
materials. Its high-speed, high-quality 
results and upgradeability are valued 
in fields as diverse as nanotechnology, 
biology and pharmaceuticals.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report20

The healthcare market

Pre and post surgery comparison for 
cranioplasty procedure at the Centro 
Médico Teknon in Barcelona, Spain.

Additive manufacturing for customised care

From complex reconstructive facial 
surgery to orthopaedic and trauma 
surgery, advances in additive 
manufacturing have inspired a 
growing number of progressive 
surgeons to commission metal 
3D-printed patient specific 
implants (PSIs) and cutting 
guides for both complex and 
straightforward procedures.

Personalising patient 
treatments
UK NHS hospitals, in their quest for 
better quality and efficiency, have used 
3D-printed anatomical models, guides 
and implants to improve the predictability, 
accuracy, safety and speed of operations. 

Now, a hospital in Spain has proved 
that the technology can also be used 
across international borders in a classic 
example of global technology transfer with 
UK experts.

At the Centro Médico Teknon in 
Barcelona, neurosurgeon Bartolomé Oliver 

MD, PhD, was introduced to a 68-year-old 
female patient with a benign growth from 
the left side of her cranium, caused by a 
meningioma, a tumour that arises from the 
meninges – the membranes surrounding 
brain and spinal cord.

The computerised tomography (CT) 
scan revealed the growth was expanding 
outwards into the skull-bone. The patient 
required a craniotomy to remove the 
growth and a cranioplasty to rebuild her 
skull. Dr Oliver planned for the combined 
craniotomy and cranioplasty operation 
allowing the patient to be treated in a 
single procedure.

UK. The parts were manufactured on 
a Renishaw AM 250 metal additive 
manufacturing machine in titanium with a 
satin finish as per Dr Oliver’s specification. 
The material used was Ti MG1 tested to 
ISO 10993 part 1, which was then treated 
with Renishaw’s X-flex™ technology. 
This ensures high ductility, which is 
important to prevent the risk of breakages 
in surgery should the implant need to be 
adjusted, for example, due to unexpected 
hard tissue changes.

The operation was successful and 
incident-free with the cranial plate being 
fitted safely and accurately.

The hospital’s CT scans were transferred 
from Spain to PDR, a world-leading 
design consultancy and applied research 
centre, based in Cardiff, UK, where they 
were imported into the MIMICS® software 
program and then converted into an STL 
file for modelling by PDR.

Renishaw received the files of the 
approved designs for both the implant and 
cutting guide and 3D-printed them at its 
central manufacturing unit in Stonehouse, 

With safety being the paramount priority, 
supplying a predefined cutting guide 
and the corresponding implant helped 
eliminate all the risk that might come 
from the current manual nature of the 
procedure. Dr Oliver’s own verdict: “It 
ensured an absolutely safe operation with 
no risk to the patient.”

Dr Oliver reported a 30% saving in theatre 
time which was a further benefit of this 
streamlined method.

Metal 3D printed models, guides and 
implants for cranial surgery.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016Our technologies are being applied 
to an ever increasing number of 
applications within healthcare, 
including brain surgery,  
re-constructive surgery, dentistry 
and infectious disease diagnosis. 
This illustration highlights areas 
in which Renishaw products 
are making a real 
difference to 
patient outcomes.

21

Drug delivery systems for oncology  
and other treatments 
Metal 3D printing techniques are used to 
build compact multi-channel ports and the 
neuromate surgical robot with neuroinspire 
planning software enables precise 
placement of implantables.

Maxillofacial implants and surgical 
guides
Customised implants and cutting guides 
for use during surgery are designed using 
specially developed software and built with 
additive manufacturing systems, optimised 
for healthcare applications.

Orthopaedic implants 
Metal 3D printing machines enable the 
production of patient specific custom 
implants in bio-compatible materials, and 
with surfaces that aid osseointegration.

Rapid diagnosis of infectious disease 
In vitro tests for rapid identification of 
fungal diseases reduce the need for costly 
prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes 
through earlier diagnosis of life threatening 
infections.

Dental implants and restorations 
Precision machining combined with 3D 
printing results in shorter manufacturing 
lead times and improved fit of dental 
frameworks, meaning patients need to 
spend less time in the dentist’s chair.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report22

Our strategy

Eight strategic priorities 
drive our business model 

2
Continual  
research creating 
strong market 
positions with 
innovative  
products

3
Efficient, 
high-quality 
manufacturing

1

People

4
Global 
customer 
support

8
Supplementing 
the business  
via niche 
acquisitions

7
Consistent 
organic  
growth

6

Strong market 
presence 
and focus on 
emerging markets

5
Focus 
on delivering 
solutions

 We have tried to build a different company. Different in 
how we apply technology to real world problems; in how 
we invest for the long term; in how we manufacture 
rather than outsource; in how we work in partnership 

with our customers. 

Sir David R McMurtry, Chairman and Chief Executive

John Deer, Deputy Chairman

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
23

Key performance indicators

The main performance measures monitored by the Board are:

Financial KPIs

494.7

436.6

355.5

346.9

331.9

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Revenue (£m) 
We are focused on growth in 
revenue, through increasing 
our market and geographic 
penetration and continually 
introducing new products. 
We have also made a number of 
acquisitions over the last five years 
which expand our product range 
and will support revenue growth 
by using the Group’s worldwide 
marketing and distribution 
infrastructure to expand 
these businesses.

Non-financial KPIs

  Renishaw employee turnover 
compared to the bar chart 
showing the UK average.

10.7%

10.0%

9.5%

8.0%

8.0%

7.4%

5.7%

2016

2015

5.0%

2014

5.5%

2012

3.2%

2013

Employee turnover (%)
We continue to train, develop 
and reward our employees so 
that we retain skilled and effective 
teams of people. Our aim is to 
maintain a UK employee turnover 
rate which is below the UK 
average for the manufacturing 
and production sector.

  Included in the Consolidated 
income statement
69.1
 Gross expenditure

66.1

63.3

56.8

53.3

51.8

48.7

47.9

45.0

72.2

167.5

94.9

48.0

46.5

41.2

40.0

38.5

95.6

88.9

82.3

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Total engineering costs 
including research and 
development (£m) 
The growth of the business 
is fundamentally dependent 
on the continuing investment 
in engineering costs for the 
development of new products and 
processes. The Group continues 
to make significant investment in 
future products, with engineering 
costs equal to approximately 16% 
of group revenue, and has also 
been accelerating new product 
development in certain areas.

120

114

105

71

51

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Number of apprentices 
in training 
We believe we need to provide 
many options for career entry for 
young people and we are proud 
of our apprenticeship scheme 
and the success it has achieved, 
both for the apprentices that have 
trained with us and for Renishaw 
in terms of addressing skills gaps. 
In a period of growth, we intend to 
increase the number of apprentices 
taken into training each year.

Adjusted earnings per 
share (pence) 
In order to provide an increasing 
return to shareholders, along 
with retaining adequate funds 
for reinvestment in the business, 
we aim to achieve year-on-year 
growth in earnings per share.

Dividend per share (pence) 
We aim to achieve significant 
long-term returns to shareholders 
by maintaining a progressive 
dividend policy, whilst maintaining 
a solid capital base with sufficient 
working capital to support the 
forecast growth.

Total lost working time injuries per 
100,000 hours worked.

0.08

0.05

0.03

0.03

0.02

2014

2013

2012

2016

2015

Health and safety
In a manufacturing environment, 
it is crucial that we maintain high 
standards of health and safety. 
Our aim is to have zero fatalities 
and zero lost working time injuries.

Number of new placements and 
members of the graduate and 
apprenticeship schemes (on a 
calendar year basis). 

40

68

108

24
55

94

2014

2013

25
40

80

2012

46

76

40

70

100

105

2016

2015

  New apprenticeships
 New graduates
  New placements

Training
Our strategy is to grow organically, 
so developing students and 
taking on apprentices and 
graduates forms a key element 
of this strategy. Dependent on 
economic conditions, we propose 
to increase year-on-year the 
number of new apprenticeships, 
graduate and student placements 
we take on.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report  
24

Our strategy in action

People

Continual research creating  
strong market positions with 
innovative products

Efficient high-quality  
manufacturing

Renishaw’s people are central to the 
success of its business. Our innovative, 
hard-working and loyal employees 
make Renishaw the business success 
that it is. A significant number of them 
have worked in the Group for two 
or three decades, creating a large 
collaborative team with a wealth of 
specialised engineering expertise. 
Renishaw has actively focused on the 
ongoing recruitment and training of 
many bright and enthusiastic young 
graduates and apprentices and 
experienced professionals in order to 
further develop talent.

  For further information see pages 54–55

Renishaw is well known for its 
sector-leading investment in R&D and 
engineering. “Apply innovation” is a 
way of life for Renishaw employees, not 
just a strap-line. We have continued 
to protect our core businesses with 
exciting new patented technology 
and process developments, whilst 
also diversifying into new product and 
market areas.

  For further information see pages 32–33

Renishaw is a highly vertically 
integrated organisation with significant 
in-house manufacturing capabilities.

With high-quality manufacturing 
plants located in the UK, Ireland, 
India, Germany, USA and France, we 
are able to deliver robust and reliable 
products tested to our exacting 
standards. Our efficiencies, through 
in-house automation and the use of 
our own latest product developments, 
enable us to be competitive with the 
highest volume processes.

  For further information see pages 30–31

Global customer  
support

Focus on delivering  
solutions

Renishaw is founded on the belief that 
excellent customer support delivers 
success. Our customers are often 
global, with an order being placed in 
one country, the product shipped to 
another and the eventual end-user 
often located on a different continent. 
By having “local” global support 
through our wholly-owned subsidiary 
network, we are able to assure 
customers that whatever their needs, 
we are able to support and assist 
them, resulting in a positive return on 
their investment.

  For further information see pages 28–29

Renishaw’s business has transitioned 
over recent years from primarily 
being a supplier of products to 
capital equipment manufacturers, to 
becoming much more focused on 
delivering a full solution directly to the 
end-user. Our experience in our core 
product lines, which has highlighted 
that our global customers need 
assistance in solving their problems, 
is being carried across into our 
newer offerings.

  For further information see pages 26–27

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201625

Strong market presence  
and focus on emerging  
markets

Consistent organic  
growth

Supplementing the  
business via niche  
acquisitions

We actively undertake acquisitions as a 
means to expand our product portfolio, 
quicken geographic market penetration 
and gain access to new patents, 
technologies and customers.

Progress

We continue to integrate acquired 
businesses and evaluate acquisition 
opportunities. We have deepened 
our relationship with and increased 
our investment to 24.9% in HiETA 
Technologies Limited, a UK company 
specialising in the design and delivery 
of additive manufacturing products, 
such as heat exchangers for a range 
of applications – a complementary 
business for our additive manufacturing 
products line. 

Renishaw has always been a global 
group with a strong local presence. 
By ensuring we target emerging 
markets we are able to develop 
strong working partnerships with 
newly developing businesses. 
These loyal relationships build quickly 
as our customers realise that all our 
customers are important to us.

Progress

Renishaw’s expansion into new 
growth economies continues, and 
this year we have established new 
subsidiaries in Finland, Denmark and 
Hungary. We have also relocated to 
larger 14,800 sq ft premises in Taiwan 
in order to accommodate growth 
in the Far East region. The process 
of developing larger offices in the 
USA, Mexico, Spain and Sweden is 
also underway.

Whilst Renishaw does invest for the 
long term, it also closely manages 
costs at all levels and ensures that 
it does not undertake undue risks. 
It is through this approach that 
Renishaw has been able to deliver 
such a long-term track record of 
profitable growth.

Progress

Renishaw has continued to experience 
underlying growth, which has justified 
further investment in infrastructure 
including our people, facilities and 
subsidiaries. For example, our ROW 
(Rest of the World) sales operation, 
which is responsible for 11 overseas 
areas has expanded this year by 
opening new subsidiaries in Finland, 
Denmark and Hungary as well as 
recruiting extra sales and technical 
support staff, in order to support 
growth. ROW is also progressing 
upgraded facilities in Sweden and 
new offices in Turkey and Hungary as 
well as increased investment generally 
in India. Furthermore, our additive 
manufacturing business is establishing 
a global network of Solutions Centres 
in order to support existing and 
future growth. This year we have 
already opened our first Solutions 
Centres in Europe, North America 
and Asia with further facilities due to 
open later in 2016, see page 27 for 
more information.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report26

Our strategy in action – Focus on delivering solutions

Additive manufacturing 
(AM) provides tremendous 
freedom to create 
complex, intricate and 
customised products, 
manufactured direct from 
a “sliced” CAD model, 
with no need for expensive 
tooling. Renishaw is 
leading the transition 
of metal AM to volume 
production applications.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201627

Re-using AM powder
At the end of a build, unmelted metal 
powder is collected and sieved ready for 
re-use. Potentially, powder can change 
either physically and/or chemically with 
repeated re-use, causing it to go out of 
specification and rendering it unsuitable 
for the AM process. Renishaw has 
conducted a study examining to what 
extent powder is affected by multiple 
re-uses. Tests were carried out on 
the Renishaw AM 250 metal additive 
manufacturing system, which features 
a class-leading inert atmosphere inside 
the build chamber whilst processing. 
Titanium alloy (Ti6A14V) was selected 
for the study, due to its high cost and 
propensity to pick up oxygen and 
nitrogen impurities from the atmosphere. 
Over the course of 38 builds the same 
batch of titanium powder was used, with 
no addition of fresh powder, to test a 
“worst case” scenario. The conclusion 
was that the powder did not change to 
any significant extent, either chemically 
or physically, over multiple re-use cycles. 
For more details, see www.renishaw.com/
powder-recycling. 

innovative products. AM is transitioning 
from a niche technique to a mainstream 
manufacturing process. 

Solutions Centres
To accelerate this process, Renishaw 
is establishing a global network of 
Solutions Centres, where it can work 
collaboratively with companies that intend 
to deploy AM in production. The Solutions 
Centres support customers from 
conceptual design, through product and 
process optimisation, to pre-production 
scale-up and production deployment. 
Customers can access AM machines and 
application engineering support, as well 
as Renishaw’s expertise in machining, 
metrology and finishing operations. 
Private “incubator cells” provide a secure 
environment in which to develop AM 
designs, whilst pre-production facilities 
enable stable, capable production 
processes to be established. The first 
Solutions Centres in Europe, North 
America and Asia are now operational, 
with further facilities due to open later 
in 2016.

Renishaw is working with customers to 
develop production AM processes in 
a wide range of sectors, including civil 
aerospace, defence, space, automotive, 
medical devices, mould and die, oil 
and gas, consumer electronics and 
sporting goods.

Build plate showing a set of titanium 
lugs for a bespoke mountain bike.

Robot Bike Co’s R160 mountain bike frame 
benefits from additive manufacturing.

Customised AM parts
Robot Bike Co’s R160 mountain bike features a unique construction using additive 
manufactured titanium lugs, proprietary carbon fibre tubing and double lap bonded 
joints. AM enables each bike to be tailored to suit its owner’s body shape and 
riding style – a great example of product and business model innovation using AM.

  For further information see page 8

Additive manufacturing machines build 
components up layer by layer.

How AM works
Unlike subtractive manufacturing 
processes such as machining, which 
start with a billet of metal and then 
remove material to create finished 
features, additive manufacturing (AM) 
builds components up layer by layer. 
In Renishaw’s metal laser powder bed 
fusion machines, a thin layer of fine metal 
powder is spread evenly across a build 
plate and a focused laser beam traces out 
a slice of the CAD model. The laser melts 
the powder, which cools to form a dense 
alloy. The build plate drops by a small 
amount so that another layer of powder 
can be deposited and the next slice of the 
component is built on top of the previous 
one. Unmelted powder is available for re-
use on subsequent builds, creating very 
little waste.This layer-wise build process 
yields benefits in both the manufacturing 
process itself and in product performance. 
Production benefits include the 
minimisation of tooling, reduction of waste 
and automation of the manufacturing 
process. But the real power of AM lies 
in its ability to create innovative products 
that are difficult or impossible to make 
by alternative methods. AM components 
can be made lighter by making them 
hollow, filling them with lattice structures 
or by locally optimising wall sections. 
Surfaces can be shaped and textured 
for effective bonding, and complex 
assemblies can be integrated into a single, 
multi-functional component. AM can also 
be used to manufacture parts from high-
performance alloys that are very difficult 
to process conventionally. Finally, there is 
minimal cost penalty to making products 
that are customised for perfect adaptation 
to their application.

Whilst AM has been used very effectively 
for many years to produce prototypes, its 
future lies in the volume manufacture of 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report28

Our strategy in action – Global customer support

Through the life-cycle of 
all our product ranges, 
Renishaw is focused 
on providing innovative 
services to support 
changing customer 
expectations and 
market requirements. 
We are flexible with our 
approach, and support 
customer needs from 
initial purchase right 
through to obsolescence, 
irrelevant of global 
location.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201629

Top-tier service centres 

7

Test and calibration locations

10

Renishaw support structure
As well as local support within our 
subsidiary network, we have invested in 
seven top-tier service centres as well as 
ten test and calibration locations. Our local 
offices have facilities and the ability to 
provide local training courses in product 
operation, applications and maintenance.

We have invested in over 400 support 
personnel, offering their expertise in field 
service, application support, training and 
technical help desk assistance.

The majority of our support teams have 
had a long career within Renishaw and 
we encourage them to develop skills 
and technical knowledge so that they 
can become a specialist in a particular 
product range.

We invest heavily in training our people, 
providing test rigs and documentation 
when a new product is launched, and also 
throughout the life-cycle of the product.

Where we don’t have a local subsidiary, 
we have agreements with local agents 
and distributors to support our customers. 
These have been trained and supported 
as though they themselves were 
employees of Renishaw.

We are very focused on having a long-
term relationship with our customers. 
It is not just about a sale but more about 
supporting and helping our customers 
develop their processes and improving 
the quality of their product output. 
Whenever they need our support, we are 
there providing them with tailored service 
solutions to meet their needs.

Our skilled support engineers provide 
service in maintenance, retrofits 
and any breakdowns.

All of our global service centres carry out 
product repairs to the same high standards 
as our manufacturing facilities.

Accessing Renishaw support
Renishaw continues to invest in the 
infrastructure and service capabilities 
to provide seamless customer service 
through the variety of channels used 
to distribute products. In many cases 
our relationship with customers now 
encompasses multiple product solutions, 
each with unique service requirements.

We are constantly reviewing our customer 
journey, whenever they have a need to 
contact our support department, whether 
their request is for:

•  detailed information regarding any 
of our after-sales product offerings;

•  access to our technical literature;

•  purchase of spare parts; or

•  emergency contact in a 
breakdown situation.

Irrelevant of which Renishaw subsidiary 
will be looking after the local customer, 
we recognise the importance that our 
support message is cohesive and 
easily accessible. 

Understanding our customers
With a diversity of products and markets 
to service, Renishaw understands the 
requirement to be flexible with any after-
sale offerings.

Customer satisfaction is a fundamental 
factor when creating any after-sale 
product. Renishaw doesn’t just want to 
meet customer requirements, it wishes to 
exceed expectations.

Innovation in the support of our products 
is critical in the long-term relationship with 
our current and future customers and this 
is why we have implemented:

•  repair by exchange service – for 

customers that require a fast repair 
turnaround time, ensuring minimal 
system downtime;

•  loan units – for those customers 

requiring return of their original unit 
once repaired;

•  transfer of equipment operational skills 
– from healthcare applications, where 
our technical teams proactively attend 
medical procedures, to our metrology 
customers who visit our global training 
centres for bespoke courses; and

•  support agreements – from extended 
warranty to 24/7 support, whatever 
the customer requires, we will try and 
flex our offer to meet each individual 
customer’s needs.

We continually review our support policies 
and create new services to help our 
customers in their changing markets.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report30

Our strategy in action – Efficient high-quality manufacturing

PCB test equipment installed within the 
Miskin electronics facility.

Manufacturing overview
During the last year, the manufacturing 
operations have continued to support 
significant activity levels for all product 
lines, the development of in-house 
processes to support new product 
development and growth for the future of 
the healthcare and additive manufacturing 
businesses. A substantial investment 
has been made during the year by 
refurbishing the second manufacturing 
hall at Miskin and the associated office 
accommodation to create additional 
capacity, and also manufacturing facilities 
to support the healthcare business, as 
well as reorganising the operations to 
separate piece parts manufacturing and 
assembly operations to allow for future 
capacity requirements.

Strategy
At a strategic level, Renishaw’s 
manufacturing operations are highly 
vertically integrated. This is as a result of 
our commitment to delivering exceptional 
service levels in terms of delivery, service, 
and product quality to our customers. 
This approach also ensures that we are 
in control of our costs, quality and many 
of the supply chains that are critical to the 
success of our business. This approach 
has continued during the year with 
substantial investments in processes 
and capital to support the future of the 
AM business.

Over many years, we have strived to 
ensure that our products are designed 
to optimise manufacturing capability, 
whether in relation to our machining 
and assembly processes, or that of third-
party suppliers. This is best illustrated by 
our approach to metal cutting, where a 
high degree of standardisation has been 

applied to the hardware used to perform 
machining operations, since we have 
an excellent understanding of process 
capability for each platform. A secondary 
benefit to this strategy is that it provides 
the ability to upscale production through 
duplication, as required, without the need 
to invent alternative techniques, and this 
has been key to delivering the growth in 
our turnover in recent years.

The same standardisation philosophies 
are applied to design for assembly 
and test during product and process 
development, and during the last year, a 
number of new products have transferred 
from pre-production to the assembly sites 
in the UK, Ireland and India.

The Group has manufacturing facilities 
in the UK (Woodchester 165,000 sq ft,  
Stonehouse 100,000 sq ft, Miskin 
460,000 sq ft and smaller operations 
at New Mills, Old Town, Stone and York), 
Ireland (Swords 70,000 sq ft), India 
(Pune 50,000 sq ft), Germany (Völklingen 
19,000 sq ft), France (Lyon 5,500 sq ft) 
and the USA (Grand Haven 14,000 sq ft).

Long-term investment
Renishaw continues to be committed to 
significant investment in its manufacturing 
capability for both the medium and 
long-term. The Renishaw Automated 
Mill Turn Inspection Centre (RAMTIC) 
system developed in the early 1990s 
uses a standard machine tool platform 
that has been modified to provide a 
highly efficient manufacturing solution, 
involving a high degree of automation 
and closed-loop control that is facilitated 
by Renishaw probing technology for 
tool setting, in-process monitoring and 
component validation. Whilst the base 
machine platform has evolved with 

Line of RAMTIC systems used to 
machine precision metal components.

improvements in machine tool technology, 
the fundamental process remains the 
same and is the mainstay of Renishaw’s 
standard machining platforms for 
prismatic parts, with 62 RAMTIC systems 
now in operation. 

The same approach has also been 
taken with respect to our investments 
in assembly-based technologies. 
Renishaw has a very broad product 
range that is largely produced in low 
to medium volumes, but through our 
strategies of standardisation and design 
for manufacture we have created the 
circumstances to develop and invest in 
highly efficient and capable assembly 
systems that deliver exceptional process 
control and efficiencies. The electronics 
production facilities utilise the very latest 
technology capable of placing 40,000 
components per hour, process control 
by using in-line component validation, 
automated optical inspection and 
innovative technology to validate the 
performance of assembled printed circuit 
boards (PCBs). Another example is the 
in-house development of automation 
systems for assembly of certain products 
in the UK and Ireland facilities, where 
automation and closed-loop controls have 
delivered significant reductions in process 
variation, hence providing enhanced 
product quality, as well as reducing 
our costs.

There has been continual and substantial 
investment in the latest manufacturing 
technologies in order to optimise the 
cost and capability of our manufacturing 
systems, where investment in new 
equipment in the UK over the period 2010 
to 2016 has been £35m.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201631

Renishaw apprentice being trained at an 
apprentice training centre.

Supply chain management
As a manufacturer operating in a high mix/
low volume situation, with a strategy of 
delivering exceptional customer service, 
our approach has been to maintain as 
much control as possible of our supply 
chains. This has been achieved through 
a combination of in-house manufacturing 
(including the creation of in-house 
capability for critical processes as they 
become financially viable), duplication 
of critical processes, dual sourcing and 
strategic long-term partnerships with our 
third-party suppliers. We also have supply 
chain management teams based in China, 
India and at our manufacturing facilities 
in Ireland.

Risk management
We have duplicated key processes in 
order to reduce the risks associated 
with certain critical in-house supply 
chains such as machining, anodising of 
aluminium components and the assembly 
and test of electronic PCBs. For third-
party supply chains, regular monitoring 
and review takes place with a view to 
determining supply risk, dual sourcing 
strategies and our contractual terms with 
suppliers in order to ensure continuity 
of supply.

People
Consistent with the strategy in other 
parts of the business, the manufacturing 
operations take a long-term view with 
regard to development of people. 
In many cases employees transfer 
from manufacturing into other parts 
of the business to assist other roles 
such as new product development or 
applications engineering, making best 
use of the experience gained within the 
manufacturing arena.

The investment in apprentices and 
graduates is very much in evidence 
at the manufacturing operations at 
each site. All manufacturing graduates 
and apprentices follow a well-defined 
programme that provides exposure to a 
wide range of functions and technologies 
such that we develop well-rounded 
individuals with a broad grounding 
in a variety of manufacturing-related 
disciplines. Many of our apprentices and 
graduates succeed in developing career 
paths into more senior engineering and 
operational roles within the organisation 
(for example, see pages 54 and 55).

Electronics production lines at the award-
winning Woodchester assembly facility.

Progress at a glance

During the last year, investment 
in manufacturing facilities and 
equipment have continued to ensure 
that future requirements can be 
satisfied in a highly efficient and cost-
effective manner. 

The remaining factory floor space has 
been refurbished at the Miskin facility 
and operations have been relocated to 
create separation between assembly 
and piece part manufacturing. 

Substantial capital investments and 
process development activities have 
taken place to provide both in-house 
piece part manufacturing capabilities 
and new assembly processes for the 
new RenAM 500M machine. 

Production of various products have 
transferred to alternative assembly 
locations in the UK, Ireland and India 
as a result of capacity forecasts 
or the completion of new product 
development activities.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report32

Our strategy in action – Continual research creating
strong market positions with innovative products

“ From the perspective of 
societal impact, the Renishaw 
technology that excites me the 
most has to be our neurological 
developments and the potential 
of significantly improving survival 
rates in oncology. Commercially, 
I think that the application of 
metal additive manufacturing 
is very exciting.”

Geoff McFarland 
Group Engineering Director

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201633

A Renishaw engineer discusses the 
Company's innovative products at an 
open day.

additive layer manufacturing – knowledge 
built up over many decades. I think 
that we really underrate our process 
technology innovation.

querying how they will work in a difficult 
environment or, in the case of healthcare 
products, how it can be easily adapted, 
as each patient is different.

Q

Where do ideas for new 

products originate?

A

Many come from the market 

bringing us a problem, but 
they are also generated internally 
– what issues do we face in our own 
manufacturing and what we would like to 
solve? However a key differentiator is that 
part of the Renishaw culture is saying “well 
if you solve that problem, what is the next 
problem – are they connected and where 
do you want to jump to?” 

Quite often customers will ask you for a 
solution but at the same time they are 
usually asking other suppliers exactly the 
same question, and often they are also 
suggesting a solution. What we really 
need to understand is the fundamental 
problem – we can then create a solution 
that is well beyond what other suppliers 
will conceive, and which therefore gives 
rise to the potential for the creation of 
valuable intellectual property.

Q

How do you decide 
which ideas should go 

forward?

A

Saying “no” is a difficult thing 

to do, but the sooner we can 
say “no” the more productive we 
can be. We also get many approaches 
from all sorts of people in differing 
sectors presenting us with what they 
believe is a great idea and asking for us 
to get involved. But unfortunately, an 
awful lot of those ideas are knocked out 
quickly by considering the application 
of the suggested products – whether 

You really have to turn the decision-
making around and find out reasons 
why you can say “yes” to an idea – 
if it’s a reason to say “no” then it can 
overwhelm your decision-making.

Q

You have been involved 
with many products, but 

is there one that gives you 

the most satisfaction?

A

Probably the REVO measuring 
system, as I spent a lot of my early 
design career working on that project. 

It gives me the most satisfaction, and 
it also gives me the most frustration – it 
was such a breakthrough product, but 
manufacturing is quite a conservative 
industry and the adoption of something 
that is such a breakthrough is so difficult, 
because you have to create the market. 

Q

A

What makes you most 
proud about Renishaw?

One of the things that I am 
incredibly proud about is our 
employees and the Renishaw “family”. 

I think that we have a group of talented 
and like-minded people who are really well 
respected within the wider engineering 
community, where most people have 
heard of Renishaw. The respect that we 
receive is very gratifying.

The other thing that I am very proud 
about is our technology pipeline because 
there are awful lot of projects in there, 
at very different stages in the development 
life cycle.

REVO measuring system for co-ordinate 
measuring machines.

We asked, Geoff McFarland, 
Group Engineering Director to 
explain what drives Renishaw’s 
strong culture of innovation. 

Q

Why has Renishaw 
been able to sustain 

innovation for so long?

A

There is a fundamental 
answer to this and watching 

my kids reinforces this for me. 
When my daughter first started cooking 
as a seven-year-old she had no fear of 
the outcome – Renishaw also has that 
in-built confidence that we can make 
things work, that we can always find a 
solution. It is also because there is a real 
understanding that behind every problem 
lies an opportunity.

Q

A

Where does this in-built 

confidence come from?

It was the original culture – it 
was there when I joined. Lots of 

people, especially engineers, have 
lots of great ideas about how they might 
solve a problem, but it never gets any 
further because they don’t know how 
they are going to put the back-end 
together; they haven’t a clue how they are 
going to make it. That’s the bit that was a 
real eye-opener to me when I first joined 
Renishaw. When someone suggested a 
great technical idea, but then said “How 
are we going to make this?”, the answer 
was always go away and find out – see 
what knowledge we already have within 
the business and then “let’s have a go!”

The front-end idea is the easy bit. 
Renishaw’s advantage is that we have 
the core knowledge of how it might be 
made, whether it’s electronics, optics, 
software, machining, fabrication or 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report34

Performance – Overview

Despite a reduction in revenue 
and profit due to a number of 
large orders in the Far East in the 
previous year not repeating to the 
same extent this year, Renishaw 
continued its focus on investments 
required to achieve long-term 
business growth, including new 
product development, global 
marketing and distribution 
infrastructure, manufacturing 
capacity, and the recruitment 
and training of skilled people.

The Healthcare Centre of Excellence 
includes an “operating theatre” for training.

Architect’s impression of the new 
building for Renishaw Mexico.

Review of 2016
Revenue last year benefited from 
a number of large orders in the Far 
East, particularly in the consumer 
electronics markets, which have not 
been repeated to the same extent this 
year. After adjusting for these factors, 
there was still underlying growth of 6%. 
This provided us with the confidence to 
continue our ongoing investments for 
the long-term sustainability of the Group, 
including recruitment and training of 
skilled employees, global marketing and 
distribution infrastructure, IT infrastructure, 
new product development and 
manufacturing capacity.

The year saw another high level of capital 
investment in the development and 
refurbishment of property. At the Miskin 
site in South Wales, around £40m has 
now been invested in site acquisition, 
refurbishment and purchase of plant 
and machinery. During the second half 
of the year the refurbishment of a 
122,000 sq ft production hall was 
completed, which has enabled machining 
and assembly operations to be separated, 
whilst an annexe now houses newly 
completed R&D facilities, a demonstration 
area, a Fabrication Development Centre 
for educating students and a Healthcare 
Centre of Excellence. The latter, which 
includes an “operating theatre” for training 
neurosurgeons, will be formally opened in 
September 2016 and is already producing 
additively manufactured metal dental and 
medical components.

The planning application for 1.74m sq ft  
of development at the Miskin site, 
including 400,000 sq ft for long-term use 
by Renishaw, has now been granted and 
work has started on the next stage in this 
exciting development.

The Old Town site in Wotton-under-Edge, 
which was vacated by our spectroscopy 
products line at the start of the year, has 
also been fully refurbished as an R&D 
facility and re-occupation will start during 
the summer of 2016.

In Stone, Staffordshire, there has been 
significant ongoing refurbishment of the 
two adjacent properties, totalling 90,000 
sq ft, which were purchased last year to 
allow Renishaw’s additive manufacturing 
products line to relocate from its former 
premises. The new facilities now house 
our UK Solutions Centre, one of a 
global network that is being established 
to increase the adoption of additive 
manufacturing technology by providing 
a secure development environment in 
which our customers can expand their 
AM knowledge and confidence to enable 
it to be deployed in their own facilities for 
volume production (see page 26).

Outside the UK, there were further 
investments in group facilities, including 
the creation of new Solutions Centres 
– a new facility in Canada close to our 
existing office and a centre at our existing 
facility in Pune, India, which was formally 
opened by the British Deputy High 
Commissioner, Colin Wells, in June 2016. 
In the USA, the new build of a 133,000 sq 
ft facility in West Dundee, near Chicago, 
Illinois, is nearing completion. This new 
US facility will allow us to consolidate 
operations from two existing sites and is 
due for occupation in autumn 2016.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201635

The new building for Renishaw, Inc. near 
Chicago is nearing completion.

Following the acquisition of land last 
year, work is underway to create a new 
building that will provide expansion space 
for sales and marketing operations in 
Mexico, whilst in Europe, refurbishment 
of existing premises in Sweden, Italy and 
France is also in progress. In Taiwan, we 
have moved to a facility in an industrial 
area of Taichung that provides a new 
demonstration facility and is close to many 
of our key customers in the machine tool 
and motion control industries.

Market conditions
Last year was exceptional for our 
Far East business, primarily due to 
large orders from China and South 
Korea for our machine tool products 
used in the manufacture of consumer 
electronics. However these did not 
repeat at the same levels this year, but 
there was a favourable environment for 
position encoders as a result of new 
investments in LED manufacture and the 
semiconductor sector.

Whilst there was weaker trading in the Far 
East electronics sector, globally we are still 
seeing ongoing investment in production 
systems and processes for key sectors 
such as aerospace, automotive and 
energy, as evidenced by our underlying 
growth. All these sectors require Renishaw 
systems to meet their need for ever tighter 
production tolerances and cost controls.

These new facilities require supporting 
IT infrastructure, and during the 
year, there was also a focus on the 
creation of regional data centres to 
improve performance across our 
subsidiary network.

Competition for the best talent that will 
ensure the future success of the business 
is very strong and we continue to promote 
Renishaw regionally and nationally as a 
desirable employer. This has been aided 
by Renishaw being recognised for the 
third consecutive year by The JobCrowd 
(a UK graduate job review website) 
as a Top 3 employer of graduates in 
the UK’s engineering/manufacturing 
sector. We have a planned record intake 
of 75 graduates and 45 apprentices 
this summer, whilst our in-house 
academy delivered 6,500 training days 
(2015: 5,700).

UK Additive Manufacturing Solutions 
Centre at Stone, Staffordshire.

Strategy
To meet our key strategic aims, we 
continued to make investments, which 
this year included focusing on enhancing 
our manufacturing capabilities, our ability 
to demonstrate our products and their 
applications, and our continuing drive to 
develop a strong market presence in both 
established and emerging markets.

Our investment during the year at the 
Miskin facility has further reduced supply 
chain risk, whilst increasing manufacturing 
capacity for component part machining, 
electronics assembly, the production of 
additive manufacturing machines, and 
dental structures/medical implants. It has 
also provided a healthcare training facility 
and product demonstration area, and 
importantly for our talent pipeline, has 
also seen the creation of a Fabrication 
Development Centre which aims to 
raise awareness amongst students 
and teachers of the value of a career 
in engineering.

We continued to invest heavily in R&D to 
create strong market positions through 
technology leadership, with £69.1m (net 
of capitalised costs) expenditure on R&D 
and engineering during the year. We filed 
45 new patent applications and there 
were 68 previously filed applications 
granted this year.

During the year we also created new 
subsidiaries in Denmark (Renishaw ApS), 
Hungary (Renishaw Hungary Kft) and 
Finland (Renishaw Oy) to support the 
increasing level of sales and potential 
for growth in those countries.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report36

Performance – Metrology

Performance 
There was a large reduction for our 
machine tool products line due to non-
repeating large orders from the Far East, 
but there was good growth for our 
measurement and automation, metal 
additive manufacturing and encoder 
products lines. As for the previous year, 
the measurement and automation 
products line, currently focused on the 
Equator™ gauging system, continues 
to see high levels of success in the 
automotive, aerospace and consumer 
electronics sectors on a global basis, 
with integration within automation cells 
continuing to be a notable trend.

The AM products line, which includes 
the LBC business in Germany 
(specialising in AM parts manufacture, 
including conformally cooled mould 
tools and tool inserts for injection 
moulding and die-casting applications), 
continues to benefit from high levels of 
investment and integration within the 
Group’s infrastructure, including the 
previously mentioned Solutions Centres. 
These new centres require machines 
for benchmarking and customer use 
with additional machines required for 
demonstration facilities around the Group. 
Whilst the majority of AM machine sales 
are still for research and prototyping, these 
are being supplied worldwide to major 
manufacturing OEMs and key suppliers in 
a range of sectors, including aerospace, 
automotive and medical.

Awareness of our fixtures line continues 
to grow and whilst the R&R brand has 
been retained in the USA due to long-term 
recognition, elsewhere we sell under the 
Renishaw name. Growth is also being 
aided by our increasing drive to provide 
full metrology solutions to end-use 
customers, which includes the supply of 
fixtures to users of co-ordinate measuring 
machines and Equator gauging systems.

The web shop, introduced last year, 
continues to increase the range of styli, 
fixtures and other metrology accessories 
available for sale or quotation, including 
products for the measurement and 
automation, co-ordinate measuring 
machine, machine tool and calibration 
products lines. The site is now available 
in 25 different countries.

Position encoders again achieved solid 
growth, with particular benefit derived 
from the ongoing global drive towards 
industrial automation which aims to 
increase capacity and flexibility, whilst 
reducing manufacturing lead times and 
costs. There were also high levels of 
investment in the Far East semiconductor, 
electronics and robotics sectors, including 
in flat panel displays. All these sectors 
require rapid, reliable and accurate 
measurement of position between moving 
parts, and our award-winning RESOLUTE 
absolute encoder continues to win 
new business.

Especially in Asia, we are seeing orders 
for position encoders on ever shorter 
lead times. Our ongoing investments in 
manufacturing capacity have given us an 
agile capability that allows us to respond 
quickly to such demands.

Market conditions
The drivers for our metrology business 
are similar across the world. Many of 
our lines are benefiting from global skills 
shortages in the engineering sector, 
requiring increased investments in 
automation to offset the need for highly 
skilled machine operators and demanding 
user-interfaces and software that are 
easier to operate. Manufacturers are also 
faced with a relentless drive to reduce 
costs, shorten lead times, meet the need 
for increased complexity and closer 
tolerances in product design, and supply 
into markets where shorter product life-
cycles are compressing times for process 
development. Renishaw technologies 
provide them with proven solutions to 
keep machines running reliably, maximise 
output from those machines, assist fast 
changeover between different products, 
and significantly reduce the time taken to 
inspect finished components.

A key sector for Renishaw continues 
to be the civil aviation sector. The 2015 
Boeing Global Market Forecast sees the 
commercial fleet doubling by 2034, with 
58% of the 38,000 new aircraft required 
to accommodate growth. Our products 
are used heavily in the aerospace sector 
and the drive towards “lightweight” 
components is generating strong interest 
in additive manufacturing.

A notable weakness during the year was 
the oil and gas sector, which has suffered 
from a lack of investment due to lower oil 
prices. The impact has been most notably 
felt by our spatial measurement products 
line, which has historically been highly 
reliant on the sector, although we continue 
to expand our range of surveying products 
which target alternative applications.

Strategy for growth
A key focus is on developing technologies 
that provide patented products and 
methods which support our product 
strategies, with £60.1m (net of capitalised 
costs) expenditure on R&D and 
engineering during the year. The current 
technology focus includes user-friendly 
metrology software for CMMs, machine 
tool probing, calibration systems and 
gauging; miniaturised high-resolution 
position feedback systems that support 
the manufacture of high-precision 
electronics; and the development of 
AM systems with faster processing 
capability and improved process control 
for large-scale manufacturing.

We continue to position Renishaw as a 
“solutions provider” and reduce the risks 
of over-reliance on large customers who 
integrate our products. Our measurement 
and automation, calibration, additive 
manufacturing and spatial measurement 
products, plus accessory ranges, such 
as styli and fixtures, can be supplied 
direct to the end-user, whilst we continue 
to strengthen our portfolio of hardware 
and software for CMMs that can be 
used to upgrade machines that are 
already installed. For example, our new 
REVO® vision measurement probe (RVP) 
is compatible with the new REVO-2 
five-axis measuring head and offers a 
solution for the inspection of parts with 
large numbers of holes that cannot be 
accurately measured with tactile probing 
or manual methods.

We also constantly evaluate 
new opportunities for existing or 
complementary technologies both to 
increase sales to our existing customer 
base and to expand upon that base. 
The new RenAM 500M system features 
a Z-axis fitted with a RESOLUTE absolute 
encoder for highly accurate positioning, 
and many of the opportunities for AM 
sales are to existing customers who 

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201637

understand Renishaw’s holistic approach 
to manufacturing and the complementary 
products that can assist their part 
production, such as machine tool probes, 
gauging or CMM inspection products.

Key developments
During the year, we launched new spatial 
measurement products that will continue 
to reduce reliance on the oil and gas 
markets. Merlin is a dedicated time-
tagged marine laser scanning system 
that will help cut the cost of vessel-based 
surveying. It supports safer, faster and 
more comprehensive data acquisition for 
coastal, offshore and inland waterway 
project management. Also introduced 
was Boretrak® Viewer software which 
can be used for safer and more efficient 
planning of drilling and blasting in quarries 
and mines.

Several new software products were also 
introduced, all designed to simplify and 
enhance the operation of our metrology 
products. For machine tool probe 
users, Inspection Plus with SupaTouch 
optimisation automatically optimises probe 
measurement cycles on CNC machine 
tools to minimise cycle times, whilst Set 
and Inspect is part of a developing family 
of on-machine apps that complements 
the new range of touchscreen CNC 
controllers, allowing interactive part 
set-up, inspection and tool setting using 

Renishaw probes. Allowing time-based 
data capture with the QC20-W ballbar, 
the new Ballbar Trace software package 
opens up many new applications, 
including static monitoring and data 
capture for the ISO 10791-6 test.

There were also key new developments 
for the AM products line. The RenAM 
500M is an additive manufacturing system 
designed specifically for the volume 
production of metal components on 
the factory floor. It features automated 
powder and waste handling systems 
that enable consistent process quality, 
reduce operator interaction and ensure 
high standards of system safety. 
Also introduced was the AM 400 machine 
which is a development of the existing 
AM 250 system, offering improved 
control software, revised gas flow and 
optical window protection system, and a 
new 400 W optical system that gives a 
reduced laser beam diameter.

A further important development is the 
QuantAM build preparation software 
which prepares CAD models for 
production on Renishaw AM systems. 
The software allows tighter integration 
into the machine control software and 
the ability to accurately and rapidly review 
all build files for Renishaw AM systems, 
including those from third party packages. 
It can also be used as a tool to help 
guide a customer’s Design for Additive 

Manufacturing (DfAM) process, which is 
essential to gain the full benefits of AM.

Outlook
We continue to be confident that there will 
be increased adoption of AM technologies 
by many of our existing customer groups, 
whilst a continuing drive to automate 
manufacturing processes in many sectors, 
both to minimise labour costs and reduce 
the need for skilled labour, will benefit 
our position encoder, measurement 
and automation, and machine tool 
products lines.

Growth in the world’s middle-classes, 
with increasing disposable income, is 
also forecast to drive demand in areas 
such as civil aviation, consumer products, 
agriculture, construction and power 
generation (including renewables and 
a recovery in oil and gas). These trends 
should all result in increased demand 
for our metrology products to help 
drive efficiencies, reduce waste, 
increase automation and aid product 
measurement traceability.

New QuantAM build preparation 
software for Renishaw AM systems.

The year saw strong growth for the 
measurement and automation  
products line.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report38

The consumer products market

Improving manufacturing capabilities

Consumer products and 
electronics continue to change 
at a rapid pace, with ever shorter 
life cycles driven as much by 
fashion as functional requirements. 
Advances in technology, including 
more sophisticated hardware 
and sleeker physical design, 
call for rapid improvements in 
manufacturing capabilities.

Focusing on fast and accurate 
positioning
Smartphone cameras have become 
indispensable tools. Lens quality is more 
important now than ever, due to the ever-
increasing number of megapixels found in 
today’s digital phone cameras. Taiwan’s 
UMA Technology Inc (UMA) develops 
optical testing equipment for industry to 
provide accurate, rapid and reliable lens 
error detection schemes.

Lens testing equipment is used to ensure 
image quality. The optical quality of lenses 
is measured using a uniformly illuminated 
ISO 12233 chart standard projected 

directly onto an imaging sensor by the lens. 
This test pattern is an image evaluation tool 
for determining the resolving power, limiting 
resolution and modulation transfer function 
(MTF) of electronic still-picture cameras. 
Different lenses project differing image 
qualities such that high-quality lenses 
closely reproduce the chart standard, 
whereas poor-quality lenses do not.

Renishaw has supplied the optical 
encoder components required by UMA’s 
DSC-E1 series, designed for small lens 
mass production line testing. The general 
test process starts with the precise 
placement of a lens tray on the DSC-E1 
series’ mobile platform; the candidate 
lens is then lined up with the standard 
chart and the imaging sensor beneath. 
Each lens test examines 9 – 25 different 
image regions such that the total time 
taken for each lens is less than 3 seconds. 
The platform moves with high speed back 
and forth, in both X and Y directions, 
and accuracy depends on high-quality 
closed-loop feedback information 
provided by an optical encoder on 
each axis.

UMA linear stage incorporates 
Renishaw RGH22 optical encoders.

The lens quality of smartphone cameras 
is constantly improving.

Optical testing equipment from UMA 
Technology checks smartphone lens quality.

Speed is another important factor in 
the industry’s assessment of equipment 
performance. UMA states, “There is a 
gap between the edge of the lens and 
the insert on the lens tray. The original 
system had to readjust position until 
the lens, light source and image sensor 
were aligned, which often took several 
attempts. Consequently, enhancing 
process efficiency was a big challenge 
for us. Renishaw’s high-performance 
encoder allows our latest system to locate 
the correct position at once, reducing 
processing time significantly.”

UMA adds, “Benefiting from the 
explosive growth in smartphones and 
mobile devices, our potential market 
has grown 20 times. We must enhance 
our equipment speed to maintain our 
leading position in order to seize these 
opportunities. Renishaw’s encoders are 
well known in the market and, when 
compared with other brands, have the 
best cost-performance ratio. We have 
no reason to choose others”.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201639

The fast-paced nature of the 
consumer products market 
demands flexible manufacturing 
systems that can adapt to 
shorter lifecycles, yet still meet 
the requirements for high-quality, 
high-volume components. This 
illustration of a typical household 
shows a few examples of how 
Renishaw products are allowing 
manufacturers to satisfy these 
demanding requirements.

Digital display manufacture 
Large-scale manufacturing of flat panel 
displays requires accurate encoders for 
position and motion control of high-speed 
systems. Absolute encoders improve 
reliability and productivity.

Metal housings for computers 
High-volume production machining needs 
probing technology to automate part setting 
and control cutting tools to minimise scrap 
and maximise production capacity from 
each machine tool.

High-quality look and feel 
Precision manufacturing using multiple 
process control techniques is used to 
produce the high standard of fit and finish 
required on casings and components for 
phones and tablets.

Lens testing for digital cameras 
High-quality cameras incorporated into 
compact devices require good lenses. 
Position encoders are used to enable  
high-speed automated testing of optics 
at the production rates required by 
smartphone manufacturers.

Plastic moulded casings
Additive manufacturing and precision 
machining technology are used to produce 
injection mould tooling with optimised 
conformal cooling for leading consumer 
brands, enhancing product quality and 
production efficiency. 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report40

The construction market

C-ALS® borehole-deployable laser scanner 
for concealed cavity and void scanning.

Scanning for safety and accuracy

An important part of any 
construction, mining and quarrying 
project is surveying, and sites need 
to be rapidly assessed to aid in the 
efficient planning of operations, 
such as the re-routing of roads and 
positioning of heavy machinery. 
There is therefore an increasing 
use of laser scanning technology 
to map construction sites so as 
to gain accurate measurements 
in a fraction of the time of 
traditional methods.

Out of sight, but top of mind
Fondasol is a firm of consulting engineers 
which advises constructors in the design 
of geotechnical structures. The company 
was contracted by Schiltigheim Town 
Council to conduct a survey on a 
brownfield site in the 9th century town 
which is located in north east France, 
where the site contained a series of 
subterranean man-made cellars below 
a demolished building.

The Council required verification that the 
section of underground cellars extending 
beneath public land had been made safe 
and that there was no risk of collapse. 
The entrance to the cellar network had 
been sealed and Fondasol required a 
solution that would enable them to survey 
the voids in detail, from a safe location 
without entering the cellars.

The solution was to use Renishaw’s 
C-ALS® cavity monitoring system, a 
surface-operated laser scanner that 
is used to obtain the 3D geometry 
of underground cavities. The system 
is deployed down a borehole using 
lightweight rods with communication 
and power supplied from a dedicated 
surface unit.

An integrated nosecone camera provides 
forward-looking visibility during use. 
This means that operators can observe 
any obstructions, and judge when the 
C-ALS probe has entered the cavity. 
The sensors ensure the C-ALS probe’s 
position can be tracked down the 
borehole so that the scan is automatically 

georeferenced relative to the borehole 
collar position.

In conclusion, it was found that the cellar 
network beneath the public land had not 
been filled by the previous occupant. 
The C-ALS survey, however, also showed 
that the cellar network appeared to 
be in good condition and indicated 
no concerning structure dimensional 
deformation, meaning no risk of collapse. 
The Council now has a detailed record of 
the area, including cavity volumes, which 
can be consulted for future development 
of the site and should future infill 
be required.

C-ALS proved to be the only  
non-destructive way of effectively and 
safely mapping and assessing the 
condition of the cellars while minimising 
time and disruption on site.

Fondasol trusted Renishaw for its 
C-ALS system, noting that “it is the most 
complete and practical tool that we 
tested” and that it “completely meets the 
expectations that we had on the issues 
related to subterranean cavities”.

Deploying a C-ALS system for 
measuring underground voids.

Complete scan of the underground site 
in Schiltigheim performed by Fondasol.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201641

From heavy earthmoving 
equipment to surveying systems 
and mineral analysis, Renishaw’s 
products are used in a diverse 
range of construction industry 
applications. This illustration 
of a typical quarry highlights 
just a few areas in which 
our products are helping to 
improve manufacturing and 
process efficiency.

Investigation of underground structures 
and cavities 
Borehole-deployable scanners are used 
from the surface to map voids and old or 
unrecorded workings, improving safety and 
project planning for mining, quarrying and 
construction activities.

Manufacture of large high-value 
components 
Wireless probing technology is used to 
control and automate the machining 
of chassis and other components for 
earthmoving plant where scrap is too costly 
to accept.

Quarry surveying and stockpile 
monitoring 
Laser scanning systems are used to profile 
whole rock faces for blast optimisation, 
enabling improved safety and productivity 
in quarrying.

Precision parts for power plants
High-precision manufacturing uses 
advanced scanning probe systems to 
control quality, enabling power plants to 
deliver enhanced performance, higher 
reliability and reduced emissions.

Materials identification 
Analysis of geological samples and 
identification or certification of gemstones 
are two of the many applications for Raman 
spectroscopy, sometimes combined with 
scanning electron microscopes. 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report42

Performance – Healthcare

Performance
During the year there was growth from 
our medical dental and neurological 
products lines.

The medical dental products line 
again achieved a record year for the 
annual production levels of additively 
manufactured metal dental structures 
created from cobalt chrome powder 
using Renishaw AM machines. This came 
from a mix of LaserPFM™ frameworks 
(crowns and bridges), new LaserRPD™ 
partial dentures (see page 43) and 
LaserAbutments™, which are implant-
supported custom abutments that are 
made by Renishaw’s hybrid manufacturing 
– additively manufactured to capture 
fine occlusal details and then precision 
machined to achieve precisely fitting 
interface geometry for screw-retained 
implants; porcelain is then applied directly 
to the abutment without the need for a 
separate crown. Sales of the latter have 
been boosted by a collaboration with 
global implant innovator, BioHorizons, 
which is allowing its customers to offer 
a custom AM abutment for the first time.

There has also been substantial progress 
in the supply of additively manufactured 
LaserImplants™ which were introduced 
at the end of the previous year. 
These custom-made craniomaxillofacial 
patient specific implants (PSIs) and 
associated cutting guides are supporting 
reconstructive surgery, typically resulting 
from head or neck trauma, birth defects 
or cancer treatment (see Centro Médico 
Teknon case study on page 20).

The majority of medical dental AM 
products manufacture now takes 
place in the new Healthcare Centre of 
Excellence which has been established 
at the Miskin site. The Centre operates 
under an ISO13485 quality management 
system for the design and manufacture of 
medical devices and will operate additive 
manufacturing processes to produce 
medical products. The manufacture of 
zirconia dental structures continues at our 
Stonehouse facility.

The medical dental products line also 
benefits from sales of Renishaw AM 
machines which are configured specifically 
for healthcare applications, which includes 
sales to world-leading dental company 
DENTSPLY Implants following an 
agreement reached last year.

There was good progress for the 
neurosurgical products line, with 
key strategic sales of the neuromate 
stereotactic robotic system achieved 
during the year. The second installation 
of a system in Spain was made in the 
renowned Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona 
Children’s Hospital with the first surgery 
being a stereoelectroencephalography 
(SEEG) implantation case for epilepsy. 
Neuromate systems along with the 
neuroinspire surgical planning software 
were also installed in leading hospitals in 
the UK including Great Ormond Street 
Hospital for children in London, UK 
and these have been successfully used 
for SEEG cases as well as biopsies of 
tumours in delicate regions of the brain.

Whilst we are able to meet the high 
performance Raman instrumentation 
requirements for a wide range of research 
applications, including life sciences, 
graphene and other 2D materials, 
pharmaceuticals and advanced materials 
for the green energy market, there is an 
increasing use of our technology within 
medical research.

During the year, we highlighted several 
such applications for our inVia system: 
in Canada, The Irving K Barber School 
of Arts and Sciences at the University 
of British Columbia, is using our system 
to detect radiation damage in cells and 
tissues during cancer treatments, so that 
dosages can be adjusted to be more 
precise and targeted; The Children’s 
Hospital of Michigan, USA, is analysing 
childhood diseases with the ultimate goal 
to have Raman technology available in 
the operating room for accurate, real-time 
diagnosis of tissue during operations; 
and, also in the USA, the University 
of Colorado Boulder is analysing the 
mechanical behaviour and underlying 
materials science of biological tissues 
and biomaterials, including those used 
in biological tissue replacement (e.g., for 
tissue repair and regeneration).

Hybrid systems, combining Raman 
chemical analysis with the high spatial 
resolution of either scanning electron 
microscopy or atomic force microscopy, 
continue to be in strong demand. 
Likewise, the growing life science 
market is showing renewed interest in 
Raman combined with laser scanning 
confocal microscopy.

Market conditions
Life expectancy is increasing in both 
developed and developing markets, 
meaning that key drivers include the 
requirement for faster procedures 
to reduce waiting times, more 
economical treatments, more patient-
specific treatments (e.g., implants and 
personalised medicines), and safer 
procedures with reduced human errors. 
All our healthcare products lines are well 
placed to deliver for these requirements.

Global economic conditions continue to 
limit the availability of academic research 
funding in certain markets, while remaining 
strong in others. We entered the first 
half in a very positive mood with strong 
first half growth for our spectroscopy 
line, but this has not been sustained into 
the second half where further delays 
to funding have been experienced. 
Key research areas including 2D and 3D 
materials, green energy and biomedical 
research continue to attract funding 
and our spectroscopy products are 
well placed to service these sectors, 
particularly with the launch of our new 
inVia Qontor with LiveTrack™ technology.

Strategy for growth
We aim to develop innovative healthcare 
products that will significantly advance our 
customers’ operational performance by 
maximising research capabilities, reducing 
process times and improving the efficacy 
of medical procedures. We are also 
increasingly addressing the requirement 
for personalised healthcare treatments.

As a key Renishaw focus is to develop 
technologies that provide patented 
products and methods, we invested 
£9.0m (net of capitalised costs) of 
expenditure on R&D and engineering 
during the year.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201643

Outlook
In developing markets, levels of wealth 
are increasing at a national and individual 
level, which is driving demand for higher-
quality medical treatments, often requiring 
more technologically advanced products.

Increased life expectancy on a global 
basis means greater incidences of 
degenerative neurological diseases, 
which will require surgical therapies. 
With appropriate regulatory approvals 
and increasing numbers of reference sites 
we are increasingly well-placed to supply 
neurosurgeons with the products and 
techniques to support such procedures.

The market for Raman spectroscopy 
continues to grow in fields such as 
nanotechnology, advanced materials, 
life sciences and medical research.

The regulatory requirements for healthcare 
products demand significant investment, 
but make barriers to entry high for 
competitive products.

Our metrology and healthcare businesses 
are interconnected and we employ 
core metrology technologies and 
manufacturing expertise to minimise 
technology risks. This is illustrated very 
clearly in our medical dental products line 
where we utilise our own AM machines in 
the manufacture of dental structures and 
medical implants, whilst also utilising our 
knowledge of subtractive machining in the 
hybrid manufacture of LaserAbutments. 
Our Raman systems are supplied with 
a high-speed encoded stage which 
incorporates our position encoders, 
whilst a key aspect of our offering is the 
ability to give customers the flexibility to 
rapidly change key components within our 
spectrometers, such as diffraction grating 
and Rayleigh filters – this is made possible 
by kinematic mounts which are also used 
extensively in our CMM and machine tool 
probing systems.

Key developments
A key launch for the spectroscopy line 
was the inVia Qontor, our most advanced 
Raman microscope which builds on the 
market-leading inVia Reflex. The new 
system includes Renishaw’s innovative 
LiveTrack™ focus tracking technology, 
which enables users to analyse samples 
with uneven, curved or rough surfaces. 
Optimum focus is maintained in real-time 
during data collection and white light 
video viewing, removing the need for 
time consuming manual focusing,  
pre-scanning or sample preparation.

During the year the medical dental 
products line introduced LaserRPD™ 
removable partial dentures which are 
additively manufactured from cobalt 
chrome powder. For patients, these 
offer a lower-cost alternative to implants 
and for people who are concerned 
about the invasive surgery required to 
place implants.

We have supplied an investigational 
drug delivery system for a clinician-led 
clinical trial for a therapy for the treatment 
of Parkinson’s disease. The convection 
enhanced delivery (CED) system was 
manufactured for North Bristol NHS Trust 
and used to infuse glial cell line-derived 
neurotrophic factor (GDNF). The same 
system is also being used for the delivery 
of a chemotherapy drug for the treatment 
of childhood brain tumours.

Installation of a neuromate system at 
Great Ormond Street Hospital in London.

Two LaserRPD removable partial 
dentures 3D-printed in cobalt chrome.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report44

Performance – Financial review

 Group revenue for the year was £436.6m (2015: £494.7m) 
with a profit before tax of £80.0m. Last year’s substantial 
revenues arising from trading with Far East customers in the 
consumer electronics industry were not repeated to the same 
extent this year. Adjusting for last year’s exceptional Far East 
sales, we experienced underlying revenue growth of 6%. 

Allen Roberts, Group Finance Director

International Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
In accordance with EU law, the 
consolidated financial statements of the 
Company are prepared in accordance 
with IFRS adopted by the EU. 
The Company has elected to prepare its 
parent company financial statements in 
accordance with FRS 101.

Brexit
The 2016 financial year ended just one 
week after the UK’s referendum on 
whether to remain in the EU was held. 
The weakening of Sterling in that final 
week had no significant impact on the 
income statement but the balance sheet 
was affected substantially. The currency 
translation reserve now shows a gain 
of £6.4m (2015: £2.7m loss) reflecting 
the impact of year-end exchange rates 
on overseas third party net assets and 
currency overdrafts in the Company 
classified as hedging instruments. 

Revenue by region

Cash balances were reduced by £16.6m 
as a result of exchange rate fluctuations 
since the start of the year, £9m of which 
was subsequent to the referendum, with 
the loss being recorded directly in the 
currency translation reserve. The cash 
flow hedging reserve moved from a 
gain of £17.2m at 30th June 2015 to 
a loss of £56.5m at 30th June 2016, 
primarily reflecting the impact of exchange 
rate movements on currency forward 
contracts outstanding at the year-end.

Trading with other EU countries in the year 
amounted to £100.8m, representing 23% 
of group revenue. At the end of the year, 
the headcount located in EU countries 
outside the UK totalled 490, compared 
to the Group total headcount of 4,286. 
Given the recent volatility in exchange 
rates, we will closely monitor the Group’s 
cash flow hedging approach.

Revenue
Group revenue for the year was 
£436.6m, compared with £494.7m last 
year. Last year, there were substantial 
revenues arising from trading with 
Far East customers in the consumer 
electronics industry, which were not 
repeated to the same extent this year. 
Revenue benefited by £6.9m compared 
to prior year exchange rates. Adjusting for 
the exceptional Far East sales last year, 
we experienced underlying revenue 
growth of 6% for the year and 4% at 
constant exchange rates.

Geographically, revenue in the Far East 
was down by 24% (26% at constant 
exchange rates), although there was 
underlying growth of 12% after adjusting 
for the sales to customers in the 
consumer electronics industry referred to 
above. We experienced growth of 9% in 
Europe (9% at constant exchange rates), 
but 4% lower sales in the Americas (6% 
at constant exchange rates) and a 9% 
reduction in the UK.

Far East, including Australasia
Continental Europe
North, South and Central America
UK and Ireland
Other regions
Total group revenue

2016 revenue
at actual
exchange rates
£’000
195,343
112,075
92,198
23,208
13,774
436,598

Change
from
2015
%
-24%
+9%
-4%
-9%
+13%
-12%

2016 revenue
at 2015
exchange rates
£’000
189,671
112,144
90,938
23,208
13,772
429,733

Change
from
2015
%
-26%
+9%
-6%
-9%
+13%
-13%

2015 revenue
at actual
exchange rates
£’000
257,665
103,106
96,284
25,499
12,166
494,720

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
45

Earnings per share and dividend
Earnings per share were 94.9p, compared 
with 167.5p last year.

In line with the Group’s progressive 
dividend policy, a final dividend of 35.5p 
net per share (2015: 34.0p) results in 
a total dividend for the year of 48.0p, 
an increase of 3.2% over the 46.5p 
in 2015. Dividend cover is 2.0 times 
(2015: 3.6 times).

Research and development
Gross expenditure on engineering costs, 
including research and development 
on new products, was £72.2m 
(2015: £66.1m). The capitalisation of 
development costs (net of amortisation 
charges) amounted to £3.1m 
(2015: £2.8m), giving a net charge in 
the Consolidated income statement 
of £69.1m (2015: £63.3m). The gross 
charge amounts to 17% of group revenue 
(2015: 13%).

Between the business segments, 
net of the capitalisation costs, 
£60.1m (2015: £55.0m) was spent 
in the metrology segment and £9.0m 
(2015: £8.3m) was spent in our 
healthcare segment.

New product research and development 
expenditure amounted to £46.0m, 
which compares with £42.3m spent last 
year. There have been a number of new 
product releases in both our metrology 
and healthcare business segments, and a 
number of new product introductions are 
anticipated during the 2017 financial year.

Group headcount
Group headcount has increased from 
4,112 at 30th June 2015 to 4,286 at 
30th June 2016, with the average for the 
year of 4,192, compared with 3,811 last 
year. The increase during the year of 174 
comprised 57 additional employees in 
the UK and 117 overseas. The increase 
in the UK included 42 apprentices and 64 
graduates, and, in addition, we sponsor 
43 students at universities across the UK.

Labour costs, the most significant cost for 
the Group, increased by 6% to £183.8m 
(2015: £173.7m) reflecting an annual 
pay increase, the incremental cost of the 
employees recruited in both 2015 and 
2016 and offset by a reduction in the staff 
bonus provision. There was no directors’ 
bonus this year.

The Group hedges a proportion of its 
revenue by the use of forward contracts 
which had the effect of increasing 
reported revenue by £4.9m.

The table on page 44 shows the analysis 
of group revenue by geographical market.

In our metrology business segment, 
revenue was £408.2m, compared with 
£467.0m last year. Revenue in our 
healthcare business segment increased 
from £27.7m last year to £28.4m.

A geographical analysis of our metrology 
and healthcare businesses is shown in the 
Strategic report.

Profit and tax 
The Group profit before tax amounted to 
£80.0m (2015: £144.2m).

In our metrology business, operating profit 
was £85.9m, compared with £150.7m 
last year. In our healthcare business we 
recorded an operating loss of £6.4m, 
compared with a loss of £6.8m last year.

The overall effective rate of tax was 14.3% 
(2015: 15.8%). The Group operates 
in many countries around the world 
and the overall effective tax rate is a 
result of the combination of the varying 
tax rates applicable throughout these 
countries. In the UK, the tax charge 
for the current year benefited from a 
lower UK current corporation tax rate 
of 20% (2015: 20.75%), the research 
and development tax credit and patent 
box benefit, amounting to £2.4m, and a 
reduction in the deferred tax rate to 19%.

Financial highlights

Working capital (£m)
(excluding cash and 
derivatives)

182.5

130.6

120.1

103.6

95.4

29.9%

2013

28.8%

2012

41.8%

2016

26.4%

2015

33.8%

2014

% of revenue

Capital expenditure 
(£m)

53.0

35.6

48.4

27.5

39.2

17.9

28.0

30.3

16.7

21.1

21.3

13.6

2012

6.9
2013

2014

20.9

17.4

2016

2015

Plant and vehicles

Land and buildings

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report  
  
  
46

Performance – Financial review (continued)

Consolidated balance sheet 
The Group’s shareholders’ funds at the 
end of the year were £384.5m, compared 
with £431.2m at 30th June 2015. 
Reserves increased from our trading 
results which gave an after tax profit of 
£68.6m but were reduced by movements 
relating to the remeasurement of defined 
benefit pension scheme liabilities of 
£17.4m, dividends paid of £33.8m and 
cash flow hedging. The cash flow hedging 
reserve, which accounts for the valuation 
of all outstanding forward contracts at the 
year-end which mature at some date in 
the future, moved from a gain of £17.2m 
at 30th June 2015 to a loss of £56.5m at 
30th June 2016.

Additions to property, plant and 
equipment totalled £53.0m, of which 
£17.4m was spent on property and 
£35.6m on plant and machinery and IT 
equipment and infrastructure.

The main property additions were: 

As noted below under Treasury policies, 
the Group uses forward contracts to 
hedge future foreign currency inflows. 
At the end of the year, these contracts, 
which mature over the next three and a 
half years, showed a loss of £56.5m, net 
of tax, when re-valued at the year-end, 
compared with a gain of £17.2m at the 
start of the year, with movements reported 
through the cash flow hedging reserve. 
A significant element of this loss was 
as a result of the weakening of Sterling 
at the end of June 2016 following the 
EU referendum.

Defined benefit pension 
schemes
At the end of the year, the Group’s 
defined benefit pension schemes, now 
closed for future accrual, showed a 
deficit of £67.8m, compared with a 
deficit of £48.1m at 30th June 2015. 
Defined benefit pension scheme assets 

at 30th June 2016 increased to £149.2m 
from £140.5m at 30th June 2015, 
representing investment performance 
during the year. Pension scheme liabilities 
increased from £188.6m to £217.0m, 
reflecting the market rates at 30th June 
2016 and the effect of applying IFRIC 
14 to the liabilities arising from the new 
recovery plan provided by the Company in 
respect of the UK pension scheme deficit. 
The agreement supersedes all previous 
arrangements and the liabilities are 
calculated on the basis of funding to  
self-sufficiency. The obligations under the 
recovery plan are secured by charges over 
certain UK properties to the value of £62m 
and the escrow account. The application 
of IFRIC14 increased pension scheme 
liabilities by £15.4m (2015: £10.2m).

For the UK and Irish defined benefit 
pension schemes, a guide to the 
sensitivity of the value of the respective 
liabilities is as follows:

Valuation sensitivity

Variation

Approximate effect on liabilities

•   at Miskin, South Wales, the 

refurbishment of the second half of our 
facility was completed; and

UK – discount rate

UK – future inflation

Increase/decrease by 0.5%

-£18.7m/+£21.5m

Increase/decrease by 0.5%

+£18.8m/-£16.8m

Ireland – discount rate

Increase/decrease by 0.5%

Ireland – future inflation

Increase/decrease by 0.5%

-£1.7m/+£1.9m

+£2.0m/-£1.7m

UK – mortality 

Ireland – mortality

Increased life by one year

Increased life by one year

UK – early retirement 

One year earlier than assumed

Ireland – early retirement

One year earlier than assumed

+£6.8m

+£0.6m

+£6.1m

£nil

•   in the USA, construction of a new 

facility near Chicago for the relocation 
of our USA subsidiary Renishaw, Inc. 
later this year.

Within working capital, inventories 
increased to £95.0m from £77.7m at 
the beginning of the year to support 
growth in revenue and our policy of 
holding finished stock to maintain delivery 
performance given our short order book 
of approximately five weeks and to 
support future growth and strategic stock 
holdings for certain of our products. 

Trade debtors increased from £101.2m to 
£114.9m, including an increase of £15.7m 
arising from the weakening of Sterling 
during the year and particularly as a result 
of the EU referendum. There is a small 
increase in debtor days from 67 in 2015 
to 70 in 2016. 

Cash balances at 30th June 2016 were 
£21.3m (2015: £82.2m), in addition to 
which is the pension scheme escrow 
account of £15.3m (2015: £14.7m).

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201647

Treasury policies
The Group’s treasury policies are designed 
to manage financial risks to the Group 
that arise from operating in a number 
of foreign currencies and to maximise 
interest income on cash deposits. As an 
international group, the main exposure is 
in respect of foreign currency risk on the 
trading transactions undertaken by group 
companies and on the translation of the 
net assets of overseas subsidiaries.

The information below includes 
disclosures which are required by IFRS 
and are an integral part of the financial 
statements. Weekly groupwide cash 
management reporting and forecasting is 
in place to facilitate management of this 
currency risk. The operations of group 
treasury, which is situated at head office, 
are governed by Board-approved policies.

All Sterling and foreign currency balances 
not immediately required for group 
operations are placed on short-term 
deposit with leading international highly-
rated financial institutions.

The Group uses a number of financial 
instruments to manage foreign currency 
risk, such as foreign currency borrowings 
to hedge the exposure on the net assets 
of the overseas subsidiaries and forward 
exchange contracts to hedge a significant 
proportion of anticipated foreign currency 
cash inflows. 

There are forward contracts in place 
to hedge against the Group’s Euro, 
US Dollar and Japanese Yen cash inflows. 
Also, currency contracts are used to 
minimise the interest cost of maintaining 
the currency borrowings. The foreign 
currency borrowings are short-term 
with floating interest rates. The Group 
does not speculate with derivative 
financial instruments.

See note 20 to the group financial 
statements for an analysis of cash 
balances and currency borrowings at the 
year end.

Investment for the future
We will continually look to the long-term 
growth of the Group and to invest in 
the research and development of new 
products, improving manufacturing 
and production processes to provide 
capacity for the future, and expanding our 
marketing and support presence around 
the world.

Allen Roberts 
Group Finance Director
27th July 2016

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report48

Risk and risk management

Effective risk 
management is critical to 
the achievement of our 
strategic objectives. Risk 
management controls 
are integrated into all 
levels of our business and 
across all our operations. 
We continually assess our 
exposure to risk and seek 
to ensure that risks are 
appropriately mitigated.

Overview of risk management
The Board is responsible for the 
overall stewardship of our system of 
risk management and internal control. 
It has established the level of risk 
that is appropriate for our business 
and acceptable in the pursuit of our 
strategic objectives and has therefore 
set appropriate policies. It has also set 
delegated authority levels to provide 
the framework for assessing risks and 
ensuring that they are escalated to the 
appropriate levels of management, 
including up to the Board where 
appropriate, for consideration and 
approval. The roles and responsibilities of 
the Board, key committees and all levels 
of management from a risk management 
perspective are summarised in the 

infographic on page 49. This process 
ensures that risks are not just the product 
of a bottom-up approach but are also 
examined from a top-down perspective 
via an integrated senior management 
approach, which is closely aligned with 
the Group’s strategy. In order to enhance 
the Group’s approach to risk generally in 
2016, a new risk committee was formed 
creating greater linkage across our review 
and assessment of risk. The committee 
will also be monitoring mitigation of risk 
and in 2016 conducted a thorough review 
of our principal risks.

Assessment of prospects  
and viability
Analysis for the new “viability statement” 
reporting requirement (included on 
page 73) has been based on our strategic 
plan. The tools and information we use 
for managing our risks have facilitated 
the quantification of potential downside 
scenarios and the analysis required to 
make this statement. The three-year 
period selected for the viability statement 
is covered by the Group’s strategic plan 
and this has supported the analysis 
with the ability to use a consistent set of 
underlying assumptions.

These include the forecast growth and 
profitability of the Group and financial 
position reflecting current expectations as 
well as assessments of risk probabilities 
and risk impact over the three-year period.

The assessment of the Group’s prospects 
considered stress testing of the strategic 
plan using key methodologies including 
consideration of the Group’s principal risks 
and uncertainties and a simulation model 
to quantify the impact of combinations of 
risks, including an economic downturn.

The results of the stress test and 
simulation modelling were considered 
against the Group’s financial position 
to determine that in these severe but 
plausible downside scenarios, the Group 
would have sufficient resources to 
continue to operate and meet its liabilities 
over the three-year assessment period.

The Group’s resilient business model has 
proven strong and defensive in the long-
term and has enabled consistent growth.

The increasing diversity of our markets 
and customers, broad product range, 
investment in new product development, 
plant and equipment and facilities, wide 
geographic spread and service capability 
and large base of installed equipment 
worldwide, enhances the viability of the 
Group in the face of adverse conditions, 
as does our ability to self-generate 
business through our skilled people 
identifying solutions to our customers’ 
difficult process challenges.

Key focus areas for 2016

•  A robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group, including those that 

would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity.

•  On-going monitoring of the group risk management and internal control systems.

•  Enhanced evaluation and integration of the Group’s approach to 

risk management.

•  Creation of an executive risk committee comprising key senior management to 

facilitate on-going monitoring activities.

•  Creation of an executive anti-bribery monitoring working group.

•  Creation of an executive information and cyber security working group.

•  Creation of an executive data protection working group.

  Going concern 
for more information see page 73

  Viability statement 
for more information see pages 73–74

  For further explanation of our approach to 
risk management and internal control 
see page 74

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201649

Risk management framework – information and feedback flow

t
i
d
u
a

l

a
n
r
e
t
n

i

d
n
a
r
o
t
i
d
u
a

l

a
n
r
e
t
x
E

Board

Audit Committee

Executive Board

Risk Committee

Top-down review

Group risk register

Bottom-up review

ISM Board (Group 
operating companies)

Other operational 
management

i

G
r
o
u
p
b
u
s
n
e
s
s
c
o
d
e
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
o

l
i

i

c
e
s

Risk likelihood and impact 
before mitigation
The diagram to the right shows the 
Board's analysis of the principal risks 
affecting the Group, before mitigation. 

h
g
H

i

1   Current trading levels and  

order book

2  Research and development

3  Supply chain management

4   Regulatory legislation for  

healthcare products

5  Defined benefit pension schemes

6  Exchange rate fluctuations

  Further descriptions and associated 
mitigations are shown on pages 50–51.

t
c
a
p
m
k
s
R

i

i

1

6

2

3

4

5

w
o
L

Low

Likelihood of risk

High

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50

Principal risks and uncertainties

Our performance is subject to a number of risks, of which the principal risks and changes impacting on them are set out in the table below.

The Board has conducted a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the business. With the exception of the potential impacts 
of Brexit, no new principal risks have emerged during the financial year. As reported in the Chairman’s statement on page 7 the full 
business implications of Brexit remain uncertain, which will be the case for some time, and any risks arising will be a key focus area 
for the risk committee in the next financial year. Currency fluctuations, trading arrangements, employment issues and other risks that 
become apparent over time will be monitored by the committee and mitigation put in place where possible. 

Potential impact

1   Current trading levels and order book
Revenue growth is 
unpredictable and orders 
from customers generally 
involve short lead-times 
with the outstanding order 
book at any time being 
around one month’s worth 
of revenue value.
Related strategic priorities:

Global market conditions continue 
to highlight risks to growth and 
demand which can lead to 
fluctuating levels of revenue. 

Whilst global investment in 
production systems and processes 
is expected to expand, future 
growth is difficult to predict, 
especially with such a short-term 
order book. This limited forward 
order visibility leaves the annual 
revenue forecasts uncertain. 

2

4

5

6

8

* No change.

2   Research and development
The development of new 
products and processes 
involves risk, such as 
development timescales, 
meeting the required 
technical specification and 
the impact of alternative 
technology developments.
Related strategic priorities: 

Potential impact

Being at the leading edge of new 
technology in metrology and 
healthcare, there are uncertainties 
whether new developments will 
provide an economic return.

2

5

7

* No change.

3   Supply chain management
Customer deliveries may be 
threatened by a failure in the 
supply chain.
Related strategic priorities:

Potential impact

Inability to meet customer deliveries 
could result in loss of revenue 
and profit.

3

*  Increased production capacity in 

multiple locations.

* Explanation of change in risk.

Mitigation

Year-on-year change

•  The Group is expanding and diversifying its 
product range in order to maintain a world-
leading position in its sales of metrology 
products. Investment in sales and marketing 
resources continues in order to support the 
breadth of the product offerings.

•  The Group is applying its measurement 

expertise to grow its healthcare and additive 
manufacturing business activities.

•  The Group retains a strong balance sheet and 
has the ability to flex manufacturing resource 
levels and shift patterns.

Mitigation

Year-on-year change

•  Patent and intellectual property generation is 

core to new product developments.

•  R&D programmes are regularly reviewed 
against milestones and, when necessary, 
projects are cancelled.

•  Medium to long-term R&D strategies are 

monitored regularly by both the Board and 
Executive Board, including reviews of the 
allocation of R&D resource to key projects.

•  Product development processes around 
the Group are reviewed and aligned 
where possible to provide consistency 
and efficiency.

•  New products involve beta testing at 

customers to ensure they will meet the needs 
of the market.

•  Market developments are closely monitored.

Mitigation

Year-on-year change

•  Production facilities are maintained with fire 

and flood risk in mind.

•  Critical production processes are replicated at 

different locations where practical.

•  The Group is highly vertically integrated 
providing increased control over many 
aspects of the supply chain.

•  Ability to flex manufacturing resource levels 

and shift patterns.

•  Regular vendor reviews are performed for 

critical part suppliers.

•  Stock policies are reviewed by the Board on a 

regular basis.

•  Product quality is closely monitored.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
51

Mitigation

Year-on-year change 

•  Specialist legal and regulatory staff are in 
place to support the healthcare business.

•  Experience of healthcare regulatory matters at 

board level.

•  Healthcare operations in UK and France 

have ISO13485 certification for their quality 
management systems, with Ireland and other 
subsidiary healthcare operations falling under 
the UK quality management system.

Mitigation

Year-on-year change

•  The investment strategy is managed by the 

pension scheme trustees who operate in line 
with a statement of investment principles.
•  A new recovery plan was agreed in June 

2016 for the 2015 actuarial valuation based 
on funding to self-sufficiency. 

Mitigation

Year-on-year change

•  The Group enters into forward contracts in 

order to hedge varying proportions of forecast 
US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen revenue. 

•  The Group uses currency borrowings to 
hedge the foreign currency denominated 
assets held in the Group’s balance sheet.
•  Monthly board review of currency rates and 

hedging position.

Potential impact

4   Regulatory legislation for healthcare products
The expansion of the 
Group’s business into the 
healthcare markets involves 
a significantly increased 
requirement to obtain 
regulatory approval prior to 
the sale of these products.
Related strategic priorities: 

Regulatory approval can be very 
expensive and time-consuming. 
This area is also very complex 
and there is a risk that the correct 
approvals are not obtained. 

2

5

6

* No change.

Potential impact

5   Defined benefit pension schemes
Investment returns and 
actuarial valuations of the 
defined benefit pension 
fund liabilities are subject to 
economic and social factors 
which are outside of the 
control of the Group.
Related strategic priorities:

Volatility in investment returns 
and actuarial assumptions can 
significantly affect the defined benefit 
pension scheme deficit, impacting 
on future funding requirements.

1

*  Agreement of a recovery plan for 

the 2015 actuarial valuation.

6   Exchange rate fluctuations
Fluctuating foreign 
exchange rates may affect 
the results of the Group.
Related strategic priorities:

Potential impact

With 95% of revenue generated 
outside of the UK, there is an 
exposure to major currency 
fluctuations, mainly in respect of the 
US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen. 
Such fluctuations could adversely 
impact both the Group’s income 
statement and balance sheet.

6

7

*  Recent positive 

movements offset by future 
Brexit uncertainty.

* Explanation of change in risk.

     Our business model 
for more information see page 9

     Our strategy 
for more information see page 22 onwards

 Increased 

 Decreased 

 No change

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report 
 
 
 
 
52

Corporate social responsibility

 Our overarching goal in all of our CSR activities is to support 
the sustainable growth of our business and ensure its longevity 
and prosperity. To support this aim, our CSR strategy focuses 
on the material enviromental impacts that we are best placed 

to influence and control. 

Allen Roberts, Group Finance Director

Strategy update
At Renishaw we seek excellence in 
every aspect of our business and are 
committed to managing our business in 
a responsible manner. We recognise that 
we have a responsibility to our people, 
and the communities within which we 
operate. We are seeking to address the 
fact that our operations, products and 
sourcing have both direct and indirect 
environmental impacts. We believe that by 
minimising these impacts and operating 
in an ethical and sustainable manner, 
we are able to reduce risks in our supply 
chain and make a positive difference in 
these communities. We have focused 
our sustainability efforts on areas where 
we believe we are best placed to make 
improvements. These areas are resource 
and energy, education, community and 
innovation. We are proactively addressing 
issues such as rising energy costs, 
constraints on emissions, finite resources, 
increasing water scarcity, the need for 
greater transparency and skills shortages. 

We have assessed our CSR impacts 
and have identified those most material 
to our business; these include waste 
management, energy consumption, GHG 
emissions and people.

Human rights and slavery
A strict non-discrimination policy is 
embedded into our Group Business 
Code, which states the minimum 
standards expected within the Group and 
from our representatives. This Code sets 
out our position that our employees have 
the right to non-discriminatory treatment 
and equal opportunities, and to work in 
a safe and secure working environment, 
with a fair wage. Proper consideration is 
given to applications for employment from 
all genders, ethnic backgrounds and from 
those with disabilities. Opportunities are 
given to employees who become disabled 
to continue in their employment or to be 
trained for other positions.

This year, we have developed a new 
strategy to strengthen the level of due 
diligence applied to our supply chain. 
This policy has built upon the processes 
already developed to mitigate the risk of 
utilisation of conflict minerals within our 
supply chains, and applied these general 
principles tailored as required, to modern 
slavery and human rights risks. We have 
developed a risk-based approach to 
ensure that our efforts are focused on 
the “at risk” areas. 

We continue to use our Group 
Business Code and other policies in 
order to set expectations with potential 
suppliers. The full Code can be found 
at www.renishaw.com.

Aerial view of the Miskin site showing 
installation of solar panels.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201653

2016 CSR targets and progress

Targets 

Progress 

Waste management: 

5% reduction of waste to landfill 
from UK operations 

 For more information see page 61

•  We have been re-certified to the 
Carbon Trust waste standard.

•  Just over 2,478 tonnes of waste 

from our UK operations was diverted 
from landfill.

73% 

reduction of waste to landfill from  
our UK operations.

95% 

of all waste diverted from landfill. 

Energy consumption: 

Decrease reliance on fossil fuel 
derived energy 

 For more information see pages 59–60

•  We commissioned two further solar 

arrays this year.

•  We have added more low energy 
lighting systems, reducing our 
demand by a further 1.2m kWh.

•  Over 600,000 kWh reduction of 

energy demand for space heating. 

816,000 kWh

of electricity generated this year. 

Solar arrays with an annual generating  
capacity in excess of

1,308,000 kWh 

are now in operation.

GHG emissions: 

3% reduction in GHG tCO2e per 
million pounds turnover compared 
to 2015.

 For more information see page 60

•  A further 12% (2015: 33%) reduction 

of GHG emissions from natural 
gas consumption.

•  8% reduction in Scope 3 

GHG emissions. 

•  £2.7m invested in energy 

reduction projects. 

10% 

increase in GHG tCO2e emissions per 
£m turnover compared to 2015.

3% 

decrease in absolute GHG emissions. 

•  4,286 people employed, an increase 

of 4.5% since last year. 

•  Over 238 people across the Group 
on structured apprenticeship and 
graduate programmes. 

•  Over £2m invested in training this year.

5% 

of our people are on structured 
apprenticeship or graduate 
programmes.

People: 

5% of our employees as 
apprentices, graduates or 
sponsored students on structured 
programmes.

 For more information see pages 54–55

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report 
54

Our strategy in action – People

Roxanne Pollard, 
Mechanical Design 
Engineer, started 
at Renishaw as an 
apprentice engineer 
and completed a 4-year 
apprenticeship, during 
which she obtained a 
NVQ level 3, VRQ, HNC 
and HND in engineering. 
She has since gone 
on to work with the 
Group Engineering 
team as a mechanical 
design engineer, 
whilst completing a 
Renishaw-funded 
part-time mechanical 
engineering degree.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201655

Recently appointed as a director on the 
Board, Will Lee benefited from an MBA 
sponsored by Renishaw (see below).

People 
Diversity

Renishaw enjoys the advantages of 
being a global company. With over 20 
nationalities represented in our senior 
management group, we benefit from their 
understanding of different cultures, and 
acknowledge the advantages that these 
varied experiences bring to the business. 
On 30th June 2016, we employed 4,286 
people across the Group, an increase 
of 4% since last year. Of these, 3,296 
(77%) are male and 990 (23%) are female. 
There are nine directors on the Board, 
consisting of seven males and two 
females. The senior management group 
is made up of 60 people, of which 58 
(97%) are male and 2 (3%) are female. 
Renishaw regards its senior management 
group to be the Executive Board, the 
heads of each products line, sales 
territory, and manufacturing organisation 
that report directly into the Executive 
Board, and the directors of Renishaw’s 
subsidiary undertakings.

Communication and participation

As a group that operates in a large 
number of territories across the globe, 
we recognise the need for clear and open 
communication between sites, functions 
and levels of management. Our flat 
structure encourages our people to voice 
their ideas or concerns and we have 
received many excellent ideas as a result. 
To facilitate the dissemination of top-
down information, regular communication 
meetings are held with a Board member 
present. Presentations of the annual 
and half-year financial results are given 
to employees at our larger locations, 
supplemented by video-conference 
presentations for smaller, remote sites.

We also actively encourage upward 
communication through various other 
channels. Our suggestion scheme 
enables our people to submit ideas for 
consideration. The suitability for adoption 
is assessed, with awards given for 
the most successful implementations. 
There is also an inventors’ award scheme 
for individuals who are named as inventors 
of granted patents.

Training and development

We value our highly-skilled people and 
recognise that retaining them is essential 
to the future of our business; as such, 
we place a large emphasis on ensuring 
that our training programmes work 
effectively for our people and business 
needs. To illustrate this Will Lee, who 
joined Renishaw as a graduate in 1996, 
has progressed all the way to become 
a Board director in 2016. This year, 
we invested around £2m in training 
programmes. This investment has been 
used to develop 120 apprentices, 118 
graduates on our graduate training 
programme, and career development for 
employees. We are currently funding the 
further education of 190 of our people 
across the business at HNC, HND and 
degree level, in engineering, software and 
commercial/business disciplines.

MySkills was launched in May 2015 and is 
a library of training that can be accessed 
by employees around the world. It has 
been designed to equip middle and 
senior managers with the necessary 
skills and behaviours to lead Renishaw 
to meet business challenges. Our people 
participate in the programmes and actively 
pursue their own development plans 
with the support of their line manager. 
Within the library we have a broad range 
of courses focused on equal opportunities 
and diversity, technical development, 

Training for the Equator gauging system 
taking place at New Mills.

leadership/management development, 
induction, soft skills, career development 
and health and safety.

The Academy was launched in 2010 
with the aim to develop future application 
engineers to meet the growing demand of 
Renishaw’s increasingly diverse range of 
products. Training is vital to maintain our 
reputation for excellent technical support, 
and since its inception, the Academy 
has provided a wide and varied range of 
training programmes from “Face-to-Face 
Communication” and “Report Writing”, 
to “Fundamentals of Manufacturing” 
and “CNC Programming”. In October 
2015, the first bespoke Key Account 
Management (KAM) course was delivered 
to Renishaw Hong Kong employees with 
further courses scheduled throughout the 
coming year.

In order to expand this facility and 
maintain the quality of the courses 
being delivered to our people and 
customers, the Academy introduced 
a module management system to 
ensure that the content of all training 
documentation is kept up-to-date. 
This will be vitally important as we expand 
the Academy training material into other 
Renishaw subsidiaries.

This summer, some 100 (2015: 105)  
students join Renishaw for paid 
placements – 60 summer placements, 
and 40 one-year industrial placements. 
There are 120 craft and technical 
apprentices currently in training 
(2015: 114), with 4 in our German 
subsidiary, and the rest in the UK. 
We have a further 48 new apprentices 
confirmed for September 2016, (2015: 44) 
and 76 new graduates also start with 
Renishaw this summer (2015: 70). 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report56

Corporate social responsibility (continued)

Renishaw is an official supplier to the 
Land Rover BAR America’s Cup team.

Health and safety
We continue to further develop our 
health and safety management system 
and we are bringing more sites online 
with our health and safety strategy. 
Our management system has been 
designed to be in line with best practice 
and the requirements of the ISO18001 
standard. We recognise the importance 
of dealing with any and all injuries, as 
anything, without the correct medical 
attention, could develop into something 
more serious. All injuries, from the smallest 
of paper cuts, are recorded, enabling us 
to manage treatment and investigate all 
incidents effectively.

The total number of accidents for the 
period was 296 (2015: 230) against 
a year-end headcount of 4,286 
(2015: 4,112). This equates to an accident 
ratio of 0.069 accidents per person 
and is 23% up on the same period the 
year before. This is because we have 
extended our reporting programme 
to all sites across the Group and so 
have a much increased scope of data 
capture. Our online incident reporting 
system continues to be used effectively, 
encouraging employees to report all 
incidents regardless of severity, and 
is enabling us to record trends more 
effectively. We currently do not see any 
overall trends with the data we capture 
other than that the majority of our 
incidents are minor cuts.

There were four reportable accidents 
under the UK RIDDOR reporting 
requirements: one neck strain; two 
fractured fingers; and one deep cut, 
resulting in a total lost time of 714 hours, 
or 96.5 days.

No work-related ill health or disease was 
reported, but health monitoring in the form 
of lung function testing, hearing testing 
and eye testing, where appropriate for a 
job role, has been established for several 
years and is ongoing. Health support 
for employees is offered in the form of 
subsidised health monitoring (blood 
pressure, diabetes, cholesterol and BMI). 
To support the physical and mental 
welfare of our people we have regular 
onsite visits from two occupational 
physicians who are available for our 
employees to discuss any issues that 
they have. These doctors also act as 
senior advisors to our Group Health and 
Safety and HR functions to ensure that 
best practices in occupational health 
are observed.

A total of 113 (2015: 67) near-misses were 
recorded for the period. No significant 
repeating common causes have 
been established.

Community
With an increasing global footprint, we 
recognise the positive contribution that 
can be made to our local communities 
through varied interactions with local 
residents, businesses, schools and 
not-for-profit organisations. This is 
especially true in the West of England 
and South Wales, where we are a 
significant employer.

In many of our markets, we communicate 
a positive story about the role played by 
science, engineering and manufacturing to 
enhance the lives of the general populace 
and the attractive nature of a career within 
these sectors. We see this as a vital step 
to overcome perceptions about career 
options in these areas and to ensure a 
strong pipeline of future talent, not just 
for our own needs, but also for our wider 
supply chain and customer base.

Renishaw sponsors half-time tag rugby 
for local schools at Scarlets Rugby.

During the past year we have hosted 
tour groups and given talks to a range 
of organisations including primary and 
secondary schools, universities and 
colleges, business clubs and societies. 
This is true on a global basis and includes 
events held by our subsidiaries in Mexico, 
Italy, Spain, the Czech Republic and 
Taiwan. With an increasing profile, we are 
also regularly asked to give interviews 
to international, national and local 
media, and contribute our knowledge 
through conferences and debates 
on a range of topics including skills, 
apprenticeships, additive manufacturing, 
IT systems, exports, education, human 
resource management, innovation 
and manufacturing.

We continue to actively support the 
business community regionally, nationally 
and internationally, through membership 
of trade and lobbying associations such 
as the European Society for Precision 
Engineering & Nanotechnology, the 
Confederation of British Industry, the 
Dental Laboratories Association (UK), 
the Association of British Healthcare 
Industries, the Additive Manufacturing 
Users Group (USA), Verein Deutscher 
Werkzeugmaschinenfabriken e.V. 
(Germany), UCIMU-SISTEMI PER 
PRODURRE (Italy) and the UK’s 
Manufacturing Technologies Association, 
where two senior managers are 
board members. We also support 
local chambers of trade and business 
networking groups.

Renishaw is also a member of various 
industry research centres across the 
globe; some of these include The 
Manufacturing Technology Centre (UK), 
the Advanced Manufacturing Research 
Centre (UK), Canada Makes (Canada), 
PräziGen (Germany), Light Alliance 
(Germany) and BazMod (Germany).

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201657

Training school teachers at Scuola 
Camerana in Turin, Italy.

Indian child Poorva whose operation 
was financed by Renishaw employees.

Renishaw supported a facial implant 
operation in Nepal.

We continue to sponsor and judge a 
range of regional and national business 
award programmes that help encourage 
and recognise business and individual 
excellence. Ben Taylor was a judge 
for the West of England Business 
Awards in the period, whilst Head 
of Communications, Chris Pockett, 
helps to judge the main business and 
technology awards programmes in Bristol 
and Gloucestershire.

To further our aim of establishing 
awareness of Renishaw as a significant 
regional employer, we continue to sponsor 
a wide range of festivals, sports clubs 
and organisations in the West of England 
and South Wales. During the year, we 
sponsored the Bristol Post’s “Super 
Science” schools competition which gave 
a prize of £10,000 to the winner to spend 
on science-related projects.

In South Wales, we have developed a 
relationship with Scarlets Rugby, one 
of the four professional Welsh regional 
rugby union teams, where we sponsor 
Welsh international Samson Lee and the 
Club’s half-time tag rugby sessions for 
local schools. We also sponsor Swansea 
City footballer Ki Sung-Yeung, who plays 
internationally for South Korea, and Ben 
Morgan, the Gloucester and England 
rugby international. In Germany, we 
continue to sponsor Handball-Bundesliga 
team HBW Balingen-Weilstetten, which is 
based in an area where many of our major 
customers are located.

With significant ongoing public interest in 
3D printing, we have collaborated with 
individuals and organisations on a range 
of projects, which this year included 
assistance to the Jet Age Museum in 
Gloucestershire which is restoring the 
cockpit of a 1936 Hawker Typhoon 
aircraft. We also joined Land Rover BAR’s 

Technical Innovation Group as an official 
supplier, providing expertise in additive 
manufacturing and position feedback 
encoding to assist the team in its attempt 
to win the America’s Cup.

Charity
In the UK, the Renishaw Charities 
Committee (RCC) was formed in the 
1980s to distribute funds to charitable 
and voluntary organisations and support 
the individual fundraising efforts of UK 
employees. The RCC is made up of 
representatives from Renishaw’s main 
Gloucestershire sites and has a particular 
focus on assisting organisations that help 
enrich the lives of children and adults, from 
toddler groups and sports clubs, through 
to organisations that support disabled 
people and the bereaved. Donations are 
also made to organisations located close 
to other UK sites. A separate international 
fund is administered by the RCC, that 
donates monies to aid the victims of 
natural and other disasters.

During the year, the RCC made 
donations to 260 diverse organisations 
totalling £102,000 (2015: £99,000). 
Beneficiaries included Cubs and Brownies 
groups, church restoration funds, disability 
support groups, primary and secondary 
schools, counselling and carers support 
groups, hospice care organisations, 
animal sanctuaries and senior citizen 
groups. The RCC also fully matches 
funds raised by employees for UK-wide 
organisations such as Children in Need 
and MacMillan Cancer Support.

Significant donations of £2,000 or 
more were made by the RCC to six 
organisations, including a 3D printer for 
the National Star College, support for a 
new centre for Cotswold Cats & Dogs, 
and support to the Dean Forest Railway.

Renishaw is also highly supportive of 
its local communities elsewhere in the 
world. In Turin, Renishaw S.p.A. is running 
a project with Scuola Camerana, a 
school supported by Turin’s Industrial 
Union and Chamber of Commerce, 
which aims to train both employed and 
unemployed people using the most 
up-to-date industrial technologies. 
Renishaw is supplying metal 3D-printed 
parts, software, training, application 
engineers and access to Renishaw’s 
demo area, to help educate the school’s 
teachers about additive manufacturing 
and future technologies.

In India, Renishaw employees raised 
funds to support Poorva, a four-year-
old girl, who contracted Guillain-Barré 
syndrome, a rare and serious condition 
of the peripheral nervous system which 
paralysed her from the neck down. 
Poorva’s family was unable afford the 
necessary operation, but together with 
a contribution from Renishaw India’s 
charities committee, they were able to 
pay for the operation. Today, Poorva has 
completely regained mobility and is able to 
talk, eat and move her hands.

As a result of Renishaw’s work with 
the British Association of Oral and 
Maxillofacial Surgeons, we sponsored 
its sub-committee, the Norman Rowe 
International Educational Foundation, 
to help undertake a mission to Nepal 
to train local surgeons. Renishaw also 
donated an additively manufactured 
orbital floor implant. The implant patient 
was previously imaged using a CT 
scanner. The scan data then allowed a 
digital design to be created which was 
manufactured using Renishaw’s metal 
3D printing technology. The implant was 
successfully fitted to the patient during 
the mission.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report58

Corporate social responsibility (continued)

Pupils building a Greenpower Goblins 
car at the FDC in Miskin.

Education
Five years ago, The Engineering UK report 
stated that 27% of 11–14 year-olds 
thought engineering was a desirable 
career, and 37% of 15–16 year-olds would 
consider a career in engineering. In 2015, 
the good news is that those figures had 
risen to 43% and 49% respectively. 
Clearly the work that the engineering 
community has been doing in schools is 
starting to have an impact but there is still 
lots of work to do in particular areas.

Lack of information about the realities 
of engineering is an obvious issue for 
schools. Few are exposed to engineering 
at school directly, and the applied maths 
modules of GCSE and A-Level only 
give a taste of engineering calculations. 
There is some exposure in physics, and 
maybe in the better-equipped design 
and technology workshops, but going 
from school to engineering, whether as 
a degree or apprenticeship, is going to 
be a step into the unknown for most 
young people.

Renishaw genuinely believes that 
participating in making things, and 
understanding how products are 
designed is important in influencing 
young people considering a career in 
engineering. With support from the Welsh 
Government, we have developed a 
Fabrication Development Centre (FDC) at 
our manufacturing site at Miskin, Wales, 
which we believe is unique in the UK.

Our aim is to become a key educational 
resource for hands-on learning of 
design, fabrication, manufacturing and 
engineering skills, through which process 
we will raise engineering’s profile to 
encourage more students, especially girls, 
to choose STEM (science, technology, 
engineering and mathematics) subjects. 
This will encourage more young people 

to take up apprenticeships, jobs or further 
education career pathways in high-
value engineering.

Moreover, the FDC will aim to underpin 
and enhance students’ contextual 
understanding of the school curriculum. 
We hope this will start to address the 
criticism raised in this year’s Engineering 
UK report that pupils are not exposed to 
engineering, science or maths.

This year we recruited our first 
Education Liaison Officer for Wales, 
based at the Miskin site. This new role 
will aim to implement the successful 
model of schools engagement from 
Gloucestershire, and work with schools 
across South Wales to create our long-
term talent pipeline.

One of the successful initiatives that 
we run is “Technology Teardowns”. 
Everyday products such as printers, 
mobile phones and laptops are taken 
apart and with the help of experienced 
Renishaw engineers, pupils begin to 
understand how the item works and 
why it is designed in a particular way. 
Pupils from primary to sixth form, and 
both girls and boys, really gain from 
this experience.

We have now established good 
relationships with schools in 
Gloucestershire and North Bristol, but 
we wish to work harder with schools in 
the more populated Bristol region to get 
our name known by pupils as a potential 
company with whom they can have a 
great career. Renishaw and the Bristol 
Post newspaper teamed up to offer 
one Bristol school the chance to win 
£10,000 to fund anything in the name of 
science education. The winning school, 
Wicklea Academy, is intending to create 
an environmental area as part of an 
“outdoor classroom”.

A “Technology Teardown” session 
in progress.

Another Bristol initiative is our sponsorship 
of the Bristol Aerospace Centre (BAC), 
where we are donating £180,000 over 
three years to create a museum and 
educational resource that will showcase 
the city’s role in aviation history and 
highlight engineering innovation. 
Sitting alongside a new permanent hangar 
for the Concorde aircraft, the BAC aims 
to be a highly participative centre for 
education and skills training. Its proximity 
to our main operations and motorway 
networks means that the Centre will form 
a key part of our schools’ engagement 
programmes, making resources 
accessible to our “special relationship” 
schools in Bristol, Gloucestershire and 
South Wales.

We have continued to train all our new 
graduates and second-year apprentices 
to be STEM ambassadors. We now have 
over 140 ambassadors who carry out at 
least one STEM-related activity each year, 
to sustain and grow our multiple initiatives 
with schools and universities, including 
talks and lectures, career fairs, after 
school clubs and STEM projects.

We are continuing to develop relationships 
with key universities that have been 
identified as having relevant courses for 
our business needs. This includes the 
sponsorship of engineering societies 
and Formula Student teams. We have a 
number of research projects, PhD and 
undergraduate projects with several 
universities, and often give lectures, 
employability talks and attend career 
fairs to raise the profile of engineeing 
and Renishaw.

We continue to work with leading industry 
organisations and engineering peers to 
advise government on national policy 
that will benefit the sector in general. 
For example, we are a board member 

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201659

Over 2,500 students have attended 
Miskin Education Days since 2012.

Renishaw has independent certification 
for its impact on CO2 emissions.

Renishaw's waste reduction achievements 
have been independently recognised.

of the Royal Academy of Engineering’s 
Diversity Leadership Group which 
has been set up to help to remove 
barriers and encourage more women 
and other under-represented groups 
into engineering.

This year through the Diversity Leadership 
Group Renishaw has made a major 
contribution to the Engineering Fast 
Track programme. This was a series 
of workshops delivered to students 
from ethnic minority backgrounds 
and women who were studying an 
engineering degree but were struggling 
to know how to get into the industry. 
Renishaw collaborated with other large 
engineering companies and Sponsors for 
Educational Opportunity (SEO) London to 
deliver a programme that helped them to 
apply for jobs and understand the career 
opportunities available.

Environment
We recognise that improving the 
operational efficiencies of our locations 
across the world contributes to the 
sustainable growth of our business. 
We continue to work hard to ensure 
that the impact of our business activities 
is as low as practical. Through our 
assessments we have identified that the 
areas of our operations with the most 
significant impact are energy consumption 
and waste generation. We also recognise 
that our business travel and product 
shipments contribute heavily to our 
carbon footprint.

Over the past 12 months, we have 
invested in additional onsite energy 
generation in the UK which has 
significantly increased our solar 
photovoltaics generating capacity. At the 
end of 2015 we had just over 250,000 
kWh generating capacity at our New Mills 
site. We have added further generating 
potential of around 846,000 kWh at 
our Miskin site and 212,000 kWh at 
Stonehouse. This brings us to a total 
generating capacity of just over 1,308,000 
kWh, which is 4.4% of our UK (3.5% 
global) electricity demand. 

This year we have achieved an absolute 
reduction of our total GHG emissions 
of 3% but our normalised statutory 
emissions have increased by 10%. 

At our sites across the globe we house 
over 4,286 people, with sites ranging 
in size from two people, to our UK 
headquarters, which houses 1,380 in 
eight buildings. Our buildings range from 
a 19th century Grade II listed cotton 
mill, to state-of-the-art, purpose-built 
modern buildings, and offices in large 
and small multipurpose properties 
around the world. Across our 14 UK 
sites we have undergone an extensive 
programme of refurbishment. As part 
of this process, we have changed 
our thinking with respect to financial 
payback periods for energy efficiency 
investment. Accepting significantly longer 
payback when considering investment 
in solar panels, triple glazing, LED 
lighting, insulation etc., has allowed 
us to create a much more sustainable 
building infrastructure. We have invested 
over £4.3m this year to increase the 
energy efficiency of our buildings. 
This work has allowed us to reduce 
our electricity demand for the future by 
around 2,220,000 kWh per annum. 
We are currently looking at the feasibility 

of renewable energy at some of our 
overseas sites and further optimisations 
at our larger UK sites as a priority.

We have also recognised that an area in 
which we can reduce our environmental 
impact is our approach to the design of 
product packaging. We have established 
a packaging development team with 
the task of improving the design of 
packaging by using alternative materials, 
improving recyclability, reducing material 
costs, reducing labour costs, reducing 
volumetric weight during shipping 
and reducing the GHG impact of our 
shipments and the raw materials that 
we purchase. This initiative is considered 
strategically important for both current and 
new products, given that we export 95% 
of our goods and can therefore make 
improvements to our overall CO2 impact 
associated with logistics activities, as well 
as those associated with the purchasing 
of raw materials. In addition, work is 
ongoing to reduce the polystyrene-based 
products used to transport goods within 
the business and to move towards more 
recyclable materials.

In the UK, Renishaw continues to 
participate in the Carbon Reduction 
Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency 
Scheme and the Carbon Disclosure 
Project (CDP). We use the CDP as a 
benchmarking tool and are working 
extensively to ensure that our efforts in 
GHG emission management are fully 
disclosed and are as transparent as is 
expected by our people, customers, and 
investors. We successfully completed 
our energy audits for the Energy 
Savings Opportunity Scheme and 
through this work, we have identified a 
number of opportunities to make further 
energy savings.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report60

Corporate social responsibility (continued)

Renishaw is legally obliged to report on 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions (as defined by 
the Greenhouse Gas Protocol). However, 
through analysis, it is evident that our 
Scope 3 emissions amount to a significant 
proportion of our carbon footprint. We will 
continue to disclose our Scope 1, 2, and 
significant Scope 3 emissions, and to put 
efforts into improving data quality, and 
expanding our Scope 3 data capture to 
present a more complete picture of our 
GHG emissions. During the year, our 
total GHG emissions for Scope 1 and 
2 (statutory disclosure) was 21,192.39 
(2015: 20,659.07) tCO2e. Our significant 
Scope 3 emissions (voluntary disclosure) 
was 20,684.59 (2015: 22,403.09) tCO2e.

To calculate our GHG emissions, we 
have used the GHG Protocol Corporate 
Accounting and Reporting Standard 
(revised addition), data gathered for 
our CRC submission and the UK 
Government’s GHG reporting guidance 
as the basis of our methodology and the 
source of emissions factors. Our GHG 
emissions are based on actual data 
taken from bills, invoices, meter readings 
and expense claims wherever possible. 
For our Scope 1 and 2 emissions, less 
than 1% of the data is based on estimates 
from averaged data sets.

Scope 1 
Gas consumption
Owned transport
Generator diesel
Heating oil
Fugitive emissions
Electricity generated 
Out of scope (bio fuel blend) 
Total Scope 1 (tCO2e)

2014

20151

20163

 1,438.39 
 2,684.40 
 24.74 
 43.57 
 252.67 
– 
 55.35 
 4,443.76 

 962.30 
 2,293.66 
 124.31 
 41.09 
 262.79 
 5.98 
 59.58 
 3,690.13 

 846.00 
 2,515.38 
 32.61 
 253.91 
 305.73 
 52.02 
 75.95 
 4,005.65 

Scope 2
Purchased heat
Electricity – Location Based
Total Scope 2 (tCO2e) – Location Based 

 – 
 16,576.71 
 16,576.71 

 5.44 
 16,963.50 
 16,968.94 

 20.76 
 17,165.98 
 17,186.74 

Electricity – Market Based 
Total Scope 2 (tCO2e) – Market Based5

 17,416.00 
 17,416.00 

 19,619.00 
 19,624.44 

 20,104.00 
 20,124.76 

Total statutory GHG emissions2 (tCO2e)
Normalised statutory GHG emissions2 by 
revenue (tCO2e/£m)

 21,020.47 

 20,659.07 

 21,192.39 

 59.13 

 41.76 

 48.54 

Scope 3
Business travel
Product distribution 
Raw material purchase
Post and communications
WTT and T&D total6 
Out of scope (bio fuel blend) 
Total significant Scope 3 (tCO2e)
Total GHG emissions (tCO2e)
Normalised total GHG emissions4 by 
revenue (tCO2e/£m)

 6,916.31 
 5,292.98 
 799.72 
 557.85 
 4,766.80 
 49.97 
 18,333.66 
 39,354.13 

 4,030.00 
 11,482.33 
 1,088.41 
 598.66 
 5,203.68 
 38.97 
 22,403.09 
 43,062.16 

 5,226.99 
 9,179.69 
 277.66 
 774.00 
 5,226.25 
 53.58 
 20,684.59 
 41,876.99 

 110.70 

 87.05 

 95.92 

1  2015 figures have been restated due to improvements in our methodology, updated GHG conversion factors 

and replacing the calculation used for the June 2015 data last year – see footnote 3.

2  Statutory emissions are Scope 1 and 2 as required by the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and 

Directors' Report) Regulations 2013.

3  To facilitate the timely capture of information, this disclosure uses internally reported data from July to May and 
the June data is given as an average of the previous three months. This will be restated next year if a significant 
difference is seen. 

4  Total GHG emissions include Scope 1 and 2 (statutory) and significant Scope 3 (voluntarily reported) 

emissions. 

5  Market Based electricity is used where it is available to us. This is currently only within the UK and Europe. 

Where Market Based factors are not available Location Based ones are used in their place. Currently 87% of 
our electricity consumed is covered by Market Based factors. 

6  Well To Tank and Transmission and Distribution losses total use Location Based conversion factors 

for calculations. 

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201661

Global waste totals (tonnes) 

Landfilled

Re-used

Composted

Incinerated

Recycled

2013

2014

2015

20161

 220.40 

 131.54 

 82.15 

 152.22 

 9.33 

 12.96 

 0.96 

 2.64 

 32.62 

 394.71 

 418.87 

 1,210.97 

 1,515.10 

 1,835.96 

 2,204.46 

Total non-landfilled

 1,210.97 

 1,524.43 

 2,246.27 

 2,656.91 

Percentage of waste sent to landfill

15.4%

7.94%

3.53%

5.42%

Total waste

 1,431.37 

 1,655.97 

 2,328.42 

 2,809.13 

2,809.13

2016

2,328.42

1,431.37

1,655.97

 Landfilled
 Re-used
 Composted
 Incinerated
 Recycled

1 Includes US data for the first time which accounts for 87.2 tonnes of landfill waste in 2016.
Product compliance
We continue to prepare for the Restriction 
of the use of Hazardous Substances 
Regulations (RoHS), which require 
the majority of our products to be 
compliant in 2017. Our encoder product 
range is RoHS compliant, with robust 
design procedures in place to ensure 
that all future products are compliant. 
We continue to monitor substances 
against those identified as “substances of 
very high concern” under the Registration, 
Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction 
of Chemicals Directive. Whilst we do 
not fall within the remit of the USA’s 
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act, we recognise 
that compliance with the conflict minerals 
assessment and disclosure aspects of 
such legislation is important to a number 
of our customers. We also recognise we 
should have a supply chain with minimum 
risk, that is free of unethical practices. 
As such, we have used our best efforts 
to mitigate against conflict minerals within 
our supply chain. Continual investigations 
in our supply chain are carried out to help 
ensure conflict minerals are not present; 
we are working with a number of key 
suppliers on this project. Any issues we 
consider to be against the spirit of our 
Group Business Code are monitored, 
and we work with suppliers where issues 
are identified.

2013

2014

2015

The Strategic report was approved by 
the Board on 27th July 2016 and signed 
on its behalf by

Sir David R McMurtry
Chairman and Chief Executive

Recycling centres have been installed 
across Renishaw sites in the UK.

Waste management
During the year, we have completed 
the UK roll-out of our segregation-at-
source waste management strategy. 
This has involved removing personal 
under-desk bins and installing office 
floor recycling centres across the sites. 
This centralised methodology has 
been designed to ensure that as much 
waste as feasibly possible is diverted 
from landfill. This strategy, which was 
started in February 2014 and proved 
to be effective, has continued to drive 
our efforts throughout the year, resulting 
in a further 2,656.91 (2015: 2,246.27; 
2014: 1,524.43) tonnes of waste being 
diverted from landfill. Approximately 90% 
of all waste generated this year originated 
from our UK sites which have been 
recertified to the Carbon Trust Waste 
Standard. These sites have been 
recognised by the Carbon Trust for their 
efforts in moving waste away from landfill 
as a disposal option, towards recovery, 
recycling and re-use.

Last year, we set a target of 5% for the 
reduction of waste to landfill in our UK 
operations. Despite a global rise of waste 
to landfill of 85% we have had a decrease 
from our UK operations of 73%. We are 
still re-using, recycling or recovering 
around 95% (2015: 96%; 2014: 92%) of 
our waste around the world. 

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report62

The power generation market

Dr Taiki Inoue, University of Tokyo, using 
an inVia Raman microscope.

R&D support for energy generation and storage

Worldwide attention is continuing 
to focus on expanding our 
use of renewable energy. 
Whilst equipment such as solar 
panels and wind turbines are in 
increasing supply, and research 
continues into making this 
equipment as efficient as possible, 
the storage of energy generated is 
another area where significant R&D 
efforts are being applied.

Researching battery life
The US Army Research Laboratory 
(ARL) in Maryland, USA, is studying 
electrochemical energy storage materials 
with a hybrid instrument consisting 
of a Renishaw inVia confocal Raman 
microscope and a Bruker Dimension Icon 
atomic force microscope (AFM).

Dr Collin Becker is a mechanical engineer 
at ARL and his group studies materials 
for advanced lithium ion batteries and 
future-generation energy storage systems, 
with a focus of developing high capacity 

anode materials to improve overall energy 
density, rate of discharge and safety of 
electrochemical energy storage materials 
for electronics and vehicles.

Dr Becker investigates in situ changes 
in materials during battery charge and 
discharge with his Renishaw/Bruker 
combined Raman/AFM. This system - 
unlike scanning electron microscopes and 
x-ray photoelectron spectrometers - does 
not require samples to be in high vacuum. 
Therefore, he uses the Renishaw/Bruker 
system to study cells with standard 
electrolytes, in an inert environment 
provided by a glovebox. This provides the 
most realistic picture of the chemical and 
mechanical events taking place during 
battery cycling.

“The capability to use systems like the 
inVia in an argon-filled glovebox is critical 
for lithium ion battery materials since they 
are typically air and moisture sensitive,” 
says Dr Becker. “The ability to do mapping 
experiments and still be able to have the 
system coupled with the electrochemical 
cell used for in situ AFM is very important.”

Studying advanced materials
The Mechanical Engineering Department 
at the University of Tokyo, Japan, uses 
a Renishaw inVia confocal Raman 
microscope to study graphene and other 
nano-materials in the development of 
energy-related devices such as solar cells.

The department’s laboratory focuses its 
research on the synthesis and analysis of 
carbon nanotubes (CNT), graphene and 
other nano-materials. The laboratory uses 
scanning Raman spectroscopy as an 
important tool for the investigation of the 
synthesised materials and their structure.

Lecturer Dr Shohei Chiashi says, “The 
Renishaw inVia is one of the most 
frequently used instruments in our 
university. Scanning Raman imaging 
spectroscopy is very useful for observing 
the structure of CNTs and graphene. It is 
one of the most important tools for our 
research. We find it possible to measure 
Raman images quickly and stably using 
inVia. Additionally, we find the software 
very useful for image analysis.”

Dr Collin Becker using a combined 
Raman AFM system at ARL.

Strategic reportRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201663

From fossil fuels to renewable 
energy, Renishaw products 
are at the heart of associated 
manufacturing processes. Whether 
in exploration and production 
in the oil and gas sector or 
solar panel manufacture, our 
products are used to control the 
production of key componentry. 
This illustration highlights just a 
few key applications within the 
renewables sector. 

Gearboxes and power transmission
Equipment for inspection and quality control 
ensures power transmission systems meet 
the demanding specifications required 
for efficient service in power stations and 
hostile environments.

Wind turbine blades
Probing and other process control 
technologies enable precision manufacture 
of both large and small-scale components 
for high performance operation and 
reliability of turbines in service.

Photovoltaic panel testing
Analysis of chemical deposits on thin film 
layers using Raman spectroscopy enables 
quality control and assurance for solar panel 
production.

Solar panel manufacturing
Absolute position encoders provide 
smooth velocity control and high accuracy 
for automated operations in solar panel 
manufacturing and other high-tech 
industries.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report64

Corporate governance report – Introduction

 The Board is ultimately responsible to shareholders for  
all the Group’s activities, its strategy and financial performance,  
the efficient use of the Group’s resources and social, 

environmental and ethical matters. 

Sir David Grant, Senior Independent Director

With the assistance of the Audit 
Committee, the Board approves the 
Group’s governance framework and 
reviews its risk management and 
internal control processes with a view to 
maintaining high standards of corporate 
governance throughout the Group.

A key area of focus for 2016 was the 
tender of our external audit contract. 
The Audit Committee ran a rigorous 
process resulting in Ernst & Young being 
selected as the preferred new audit 
firm, subject to shareholder approval 
at the annual general meeting (AGM) in 
October 2016.

On behalf of the Board, I would like 
to thank Ben Taylor, who retires on 
31st July 2016 for his huge commitment 
and contribution to Renishaw over 
31 years. Will Lee is appointed to the 
Board as Group Sales and Marketing 
Director from 1st August 2016 and will 
be proposed for election as a director at 
the AGM.

I am delighted that Kath Durrant took 
on the role of Chair of our Remuneration 
Committee from May 2016 bringing a 
wealth of experience to this role.

In relation to our remuneration report on 
pages 80 to 86, the policy table from our 
three-year remuneration policy, which was 
approved by 86% of shareholder proxy 
votes at our annual general meeting in 
October 2014, is set out for information 
purposes only.

The Annual report on remuneration 
2016 sets out the details of directors’ 
compensation throughout this financial 
year, which will be subject to the normal 
advisory vote at the AGM.

Other appropriate steps were also taken 
in order to maintain adequate procedures. 
We have now trained 1,282 people 
worldwide via our anti-bribery E-Learning 
module, as well as other training initiatives.

In the period, the Board reviewed its 
risk management and internal control 
framework, and has enhanced its 
operation, including setting up an 
executive risk committee which has, 
in turn, formed working groups to 
focus on anti-bribery, information and 
cyber security, and data protection. 
Further details are set out on pages 48 
and 49.

The Board also considered the new 
viability statement requirement, and an 
explanation of our process is contained 
on page 48 and the viability statement is 
contained on page 73.

The Board takes seriously its 
responsibilities for making sure that 
all employees are aware of their 
obligations to act with openness, 
honesty and transparency. This strong 
anti-corruption culture is embedded in 
our Group Business Code and Anti-
Bribery Policy which can be found at 
www.renishaw.com/en/renishaw-group-
business-code--14444. In 2016, we have 
continued to closely monitor operational 
risks in key regions and are implementing 
additional compliance policies in 
certain areas.

Scope of disclosures
This corporate governance report has 
been prepared in accordance with 
the UK Corporate Governance Code 
2014 (Code). The Code can be viewed 
at www.frc.org.uk. This report, which 
incorporates the reports of the Audit 
Committee and Nomination Committee, 
together with the Directors’ remuneration 
report, describes how we have applied 
the main principles of the Code.

We report on the operation of our 
business in the following ways:

A review of the Group’s business and 
likely future developments is given in the 
Chairman’s statement and the Strategic 
report. Segmental information by 
geographical market is given in note 2 to 
the financial statements.

The UK Listing Authority’s Disclosure 
Rules and Transparency Rules (DTR), 
require the Annual report to include a 
management report which can be found 
in the Strategic report.

The Directors’ corporate governance 
report and other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures set out on pages 64 to 75 
and 87 to 89 form the Directors’ report 
(Directors’ report).

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201665

Disclosure of information under Listing Rule 9.8.4R
The information that fulfils the reporting requirements under this rule can be found in the 
Directors’ report, the Directors’ remuneration report and on the pages identified below, 
as applicable.

Section
(1)
(2)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

(9)

(10)
(11)

(12)
(13)
(14)

Topic
Location
Interest capitalised
Not applicable
Publication of unaudited financial information Not applicable
Not applicable
Details of long-term incentive schemes
Not applicable
Waiver of emoluments by a director
Not applicable
Waiver of future emoluments by a director
Not applicable
Non pre-emptive issues of equity for cash
Not applicable
As item (7), in relation to major subsidiary 
undertakings
Parent participation in a placing by a listed 
subsidiary
Contracts of significance
Provision of services by a controlling 
shareholder
Shareholder waivers of dividends
Shareholder waivers of future dividends
Agreements with controlling shareholders

Not applicable

Not applicable
Directors’ remuneration report 
pages 80–86
Not applicable
Not applicable
Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures pages 88–89

For the purposes of the DTR, which 
require a corporate governance statement 
to be included in the Directors’ report, 
the Company’s corporate governance 
practices are set out in the Directors’ 
corporate governance report, which forms 
part of the Directors’ report.

For the purposes of the UK Listing 
Authority’s Listing Rules (LR), certain 
information required to be provided to 
the shareholders is also contained in 
the Directors’ corporate governance 
report, the Directors’ remuneration 
report and the Other statutory and 
regulatory disclosures, including certain 
information relating to arrangements with 
controlling shareholders.

For the purposes of the DTR, the 
information required by section 7 of 
such rules is referred to in the Directors’ 
corporate governance report.

Cautionary note and safe harbour; this Annual report has been prepared for the purpose of assisting the Company’s shareholders to assess the strategies adopted  
by the Company and the potential for those strategies to succeed and no-one, including the Company’s shareholders, may rely on it for any other purpose.  
The directors owe their duties only to the Company as a whole and they undertake no duty of care to individual shareholders, other stakeholders or potential investors. 

This Annual report has been prepared on the basis of the knowledge and information available to the directors at the time. Given the nature of some forward-
looking information, which has been given in good faith, the Company’s shareholders should treat this information with due caution.

Under the Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the liability of directors in respect of statements in, and omissions from, the Strategic report contained on pages 
1 to 61 and the Directors’ report. Under English law the directors would be liable to the Company (but not to any third party) if the Strategic report and/or Directors’ report 
contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, but would not otherwise be liable.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report66

Board of directors and Company Secretary

Sir David McMurtry 
N*
CBE, RDI, FRS, FREng, CEng, FIMechE

John Deer 

Chairman and Chief Executive

Deputy Chairman

Allen Roberts 
FCA

Group Finance Director

•  Formerly employed by Rolls-Royce plc, 

Bristol, for 17 years, holding the positions of 
Deputy Chief Designer and Assistant Chief 
of Engine Design for all Rolls-Royce engines 
manufactured at Filton, Bristol.

•  Invented the original measuring probe in the 
early 1970s and co-founded Renishaw with 
John Deer in 1973.

•  Responsible for group technology.

•  Trained as a mechanical engineer and 
worked for Rolls-Royce plc, Bristol, for  
14 years.

•  Qualified as a chartered accountant in 1972 
and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered 
Accountants in England and Wales.

•  Co-founded Renishaw with Sir David 

•  Joined Renishaw in 1979 and appointed to 

McMurtry in 1973, serving as Managing 
Director from 1974 to 1989.

•  Primarily involved in the commercial 

direction of the Group, with particular 
emphasis on marketing and the 
establishment of the Group’s wholly- 
owned subsidiaries.

•  Responsible for group manufacturing 
and Chair of the overseas marketing 
subsidiaries.

the Board of Renishaw plc in 1980.

•  Heads group finance, business systems, 
human resources and Wotton Travel Ltd.

•  Responsible for both metrology and 
healthcare regulatory and quality 
assurance functions.

•  Reports to the Board on corporate social 

responsibility matters.

Geoff McFarland 

Will Lee 

Sir David Grant 
CBE, FREng, FLSW, CEng, FIET

A R N

Group Engineering Director

Group Sales and Marketing Director

Senior Independent Director

•  Joined Renishaw in 1996.

•  Appointed to the Board of Renishaw plc  

•  Graduated with a BEng in computer-aided 
mechanical engineering at Heriot-Watt 
University, and subsequently worked for 
several years as a research associate.

•  After working briefly in the high-volume 
manufacturing electronic sector, joined 
Renishaw in 1994.

•  Appointed to the Board of Renishaw plc 

in 2002.

•  Became Director and General Manager 
for the laser and calibration products line 
in 2007 and subsequently Director and 
General Manager of the machine tool 
products line in 2014.

•  Appointed to the new role of Director 
of Group Sales and Marketing in 
December 2015.

•  Responsible for group engineering, group 

•  Holds a degree in physics from 

IP and the neurological products line.

Oxford University and an MBA from 
Bath University.

in April 2012.

•  Currently senior independent director of IQE 
plc, non-executive director of the Defence 
Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), 
chair of STEMNET, and chair of the National 
Physical Laboratory (NPL).

•  Vice-Chancellor of Cardiff University from 

2001 to 2012.

•  Previously held leadership positions at 

Dowty Group, GEC, the Royal Academy  
of Engineering and Innovate UK.

•  Appointed to the Executive Board in 2015.

•  Received a knighthood in the Queen’s 

•  Appointed to the Board with effect from 

1st August 2016.

Birthday Honours 2016 for his contributions 
to engineering, technology and education.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201667

Carol Chesney 
FCA

Non-executive director

A* R N

Kath Durrant 

R* N

John Jeans 
CBE, CEng 

A R N

Non-executive director

Non-executive director

•  Appointed to the Board of Renishaw plc 

•  Appointed to the Board of Renishaw plc in 

•  Appointed to the Board of Renishaw plc  

in October 2012.

January 2015.

in April 2013.

•  Chartered accountant who worked 

•  Currently Group HR Director for Wolseley 

at Arthur Andersen for seven years in 
audit services.

plc and an Advisory Board member for the 
Lancaster University Management School.

•  Currently chair of Imanova, UK Biocentre 
Ltd and Edinburgh Molecular Imaging.

•  Non-executive director of ProMetic Pharma 

•  Worked for some time in the group 
accounts function at English China 
Clays plc.

•  Currently Company Secretary of Halma plc, 
having also been Group Financial Controller.

•  Was previously the Group HR Director at 

Small Molecule Therapeutics Ltd.

Rolls-Royce plc and held a variety of senior 
positions at AstraZeneca plc,  
including Vice President, HR and 
Communications for its research and 
development division.

•  Serves on several government bodies 
including the Ministerial Committee on 
Medical Technologies.

•  Leads Innovate UK’s Stratified Medicine 

Advisory Board and the KTN’s Health Board.

•  Appointed advisor to the Prime Minister at 
the Office of Life Sciences in June 2014.

Norma Tang

General Counsel and Company Secretary

Ben Taylor (retires 31st July 2016) 
CEng, FIMechE

Assistant Chief Executive

•  Joined Renishaw plc in 2001.

•  Ben Taylor retires from the Board on 

•  Qualified as a solicitor in 1988 and since 
then has specialised in company and 
commercial legal matters, advising 
business clients and as an in-house 
counsel.

•  Heads the group legal and company 

secretariat function, advising the Board on 
legal, compliance and governance matters.

31st July 2016 following an outstanding 
contribution to the Group’s performance 
over the last 31 years. Ben has helped to 
articulate the vision for Renishaw and has 
been a partner in developing longstanding 
relationships with customers worldwide. 
We wish him well in his retirement.

Committees

A  Audit Committee

R  Remuneration Committee

N  Nomination Committee

  *  Denotes Chair of committee

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report68

Executive Board

Sir David McMurtry 
CBE, RDI, FRS, FREng, CEng, 
FIMechE 
Chairman and Chief Executive
  See page 66 for biography

John Deer 
Deputy Chairman

  See page 66 for biography

Allen Roberts 
Group Finance Director

  See page 66 for biography

Geoff McFarland 
Group Engineering Director

  See page 66 for biography

Will Lee 
Group Sales and 
Marketing Director

  See page 66 for biography

Norma Tang 
General Counsel and  
Company Secretary

  See page 67 for biography

Leo Somerville

President, Renishaw 
North America

Dave Wallace

Director and General 
Manager, CMM, and Styli 
and Fixturing Products

•  Joined Renishaw in 1984.

•  Joined Renishaw in 1989 

through Renishaw’s 
sponsored student scheme.

•  Worked in various functions 
of the business including 
a one-year secondment 
at Renishaw’s German 
subsidiary, before being 
appointed Director and 
General Manager for the 
CMM products line in 2002.

•  Appointed to the Executive 

Board in 2008.

•  Initially served as business 
manager for machine tool 
probing and calibration 
products at Renishaw, Inc.

•  Became President of 

Renishaw, Inc. in 1993 and 
appointed to the Executive 
Board in 2004.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2008.

•  Became President, Renishaw 

North America upon a 
re-organisation of the 
management of the region 
in 2016.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201669

International Sales and Marketing Board

Kevin Gani

Sean Hymas

Director of Sales Development

President and Representative 
Director, Renishaw KK

Stewart Lane

General Manager, 
UK Sales and Group 
Business Development

Rainer Lotz

Managing Director, 
Renishaw GmbH

•  Joined Renishaw in 1989 

•  Joined Renishaw in 2000 

•  Joined Renishaw in 2006.

•  Joined Renishaw in 2011 and 
appointed Director of Sales 
Development in 2012.

•  Responsible for the 

development of commercial 
teams, systems and 
processes.

following a year’s sandwich 
placement between 1987 
and 1988.

•  Over 25 years’ experience of 
marketing, international sales, 
and product management.

•  Manages and leads the 

development of the Renishaw 
Academy.

•  Moved to Japan in 2008 
to further drive sales and 
marketing at Renishaw KK.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2012.

•  Appointed President of 
Renishaw KK and to the 
International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2012.

•  Over 20 years’ experience in 

related positions.

•  Responsible for the operations 

in Germany and Austria.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2008.

working as both a design and 
business manager within the 
machine tool products line.

•  Appointed as the Group’s 
Business Development 
Manager in 2012 and General 
Manager for the UK sales 
organisation in 2013.

•  On the boards of the West 
of England Aerospace 
Forum, the Manufacturing 
Technologies Association 
(MTA) and CECIMO, the 
European Machine Tool 
Association.

John Deer 
Deputy Chairman

  See page 66 for biography

Allen Roberts 
Group Finance Director

  See page 66 for biography

Will Lee 
Group Sales and Marketing 
Director

  See page 66 for biography

Leo Somerville

President, Renishaw 
North America

  See page 68 for biography

Norma Tang

General Counsel and  
Company Secretary

  See page 67 for biography

Clive Martell

Head of Global 
Additive Manufacturing

Jean-Marc Meffre

Managing Director,  
Far East

Rhydian Pountney
General Manager,  
ROW Sales

•  Joined Renishaw in 2015.

•  Responsible for the strategy 
and direction of additive 
manufacturing.

•  Over 30 years’ experience 

in advanced engineering and 
international sales.

•  Progressed from graduate 
engineer to CEO of Delcam 
plc, and managed transition 
from AIM listed company to 
a division of Autodesk.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2015.

•  Joined Renishaw in 1988 
as Managing Director of 
Renishaw France.

•  Holds a master’s degree in 
Economics and Marketing.

•  Moved to Renishaw Hong 

Kong in 1997. Responsible for 
all the operations in the Far 
East and Australasia, except 
Japan.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2008.

•  Joined Renishaw in 1979.

•  Appointed as a member of 
the International Sales and 
Marketing Board in 2008.

•  Over 30 years’ experience 
in sales and marketing. 
Responsible for 11 overseas 
operations, including India 
and Russia.

•  UK Chair of the Technology 
Collaboration in Advanced 
Engineering working group of 
the UK-India joint economic 
and trade committee.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report70

Directors’ corporate governance report

Board structure

Board

Executive 
Board

Audit 
Committee

Nomination  
Committee

Remuneration 
Committee

International Sales and Marketing Board, divisions and subsidiary undertakings

A. Leadership
The role of the Board

The Board comprises four executive and 
four independent non-executive directors 
in addition to the executive Chairman. 
The directors holding office at the date 
of this report and short biographical 
details are given on pages 66 to 67 
(Ben Taylor retired on 31 July 2016 and 
is not offering himself for re-election at 
the AGM). Full biographical details are 
available at www.renishaw.com. Will Lee 
was appointed by the Board as a director 
with effect from 1st August 2016, and 
along with all other directors, will be 
retiring and putting himself up for election 
at the AGM. Will’s biography is set out on 
page 66. The Company maintains liability 
insurance for its directors and officers, 
as disclosed in the Other statutory and 
regulatory disclosures.

There is a formal schedule of matters 
specifically reserved for its decision. 
These include the approval of annual and 
half-year results and trading statements, 
company and business acquisitions and 
disposals, major capital expenditure, 
borrowings, material agreements, director 
and company secretary appointments 
and removals, patent-related disputes 
and other material litigation, forecasts and 
major product development projects.

The Board meets as often as is necessary 
to discharge its duties effectively. In the 
financial year ended 30th June 2016, 
the Board met for 10 scheduled and 
two short notice meetings and the 
directors’ attendance record at board 
and committee meetings is set out at the 
end of this report. In addition, the non-
executive directors met a number of times 
without executive directors present.

A high-level summary of subject areas 
discussed during the year are set out on 
page 71.

The Board has three formally constituted 
committees, the Audit Committee, 
the Remuneration Committee and the 
Nomination Committee.

There is an executive management 
committee known as the Executive 
Board that is responsible for the 
executive management of the Group’s 
businesses. It is chaired by the Chairman 
and includes the executive directors 
and senior managers as noted on page 
68. The Executive Board usually meets 
for two days on a monthly basis and 
considers the performance and strategic 
direction of the metrology and healthcare 
businesses and other matters of general 
importance to the Group. In addition, 
there is an executive sales and marketing 
committee known as the International 
Sales and Marketing Board which meets 
quarterly to determine the Group’s sales 
and marketing policies and strategies and 
review its sales and marketing activities. 

This committee is chaired by the Deputy 
Chairman and includes the Group Finance 
Director, the Group Sales and Marketing 
Director, the directors of the five largest 
sales regions, the Director of Sales 
Development and the Head of Global 
Additive Manufacturing.

A framework of delegated authorities is 
in place that maps out the structure of 
delegation below the Board and includes 
the matters reserved to the Executive 
Board and the level of authorities given to 
management below the Executive Board.

An executive risk committee meets 
regularly to review risks which may impact 
on the Group’s business and to implement 
mitigation actions. The framework for 
managing risk is set out on pages 48 
and 49.

The Board has adopted a conflict 
of interests policy, putting in place 
procedures for the disclosure and review 
of any conflicts and potential conflicts, 
and authorisation by the Board (if felt 
appropriate). Authorisations granted and 
the terms of such are reviewed on an 
annual basis. New disclosures are made 
where applicable.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201671

High-level summary of subjects discussed by the Board during 
the year:

Strategy
•  Business strategy

•  Reviewing potential acquisitions/disposals

•  New subsidiaries

•  Products and technology

•  Key business relationships

•  Brexit

Risk
•  Group’s risk analysis

•  Patent litigation

•  Tax risk register and updates

Governance
•  Legal updates

•  Market Abuse Regulation

•  Modern Slavery Act

•  Board evaluation

•  Committee terms of reference

•  Controlling shareholder agreement

Scheduled Board and 
committee meetings 
in the period

July 2015

August 2015

R
B

A

A
R

September 2015

October 2015

B

A

B

November 2015

December 2015

B

January 2016

February 2016

•  Export control

B

B

A

R

March 2016

April 2016

Finance
•  Forecasts and targets

•  Oversight of the preparation and management of the financial statements

•  Dividend policy

•  Trading statements

Stakeholder engagement
•  AGM and other shareholder feedback

B

B

•  Investor day

May 2016

June 2016

•  Succession planning/executive management structure

HR

B

R

N

•  Pensions

•  Remuneration policy

•  Salary reviews

•  Bonus

•  Health and safety system and updates

B

Key

Audit Committee (4)

A  
R  Remuneration Committee (4)
N  Nomination Committee (1)
B  Board (10)

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report72

Directors’ corporate governance report (continued)

Division of responsibilities/
the Chairman

The role of Chairman and Chief Executive 
is a combined role and thus contrary 
to the recommendations of the Code. 
Sir David McMurtry has held this position 
since the Company listed in 1983 and he 
and John Deer hold the majority of the 
voting interests in the Company.

There has been a voting agreement in 
place between Sir David and John Deer 
since 1983, further details of which are set 
out in the Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures on page 87. The Board 
considers that there is still a clear division 
of responsibilities at board level to ensure 
an appropriate balance of power and 
authority so that there is no one person 
with unfettered powers of decision. 
The Board and Executive Board meet 
on a sufficiently regular basis to make 
decisions of significance to the metrology 
and healthcare business segments and 
review management actions. It is intended 
that this combined role will continue for 
so long as Sir David McMurtry remains 
on the Board and he and John Deer 
hold a majority of the voting interests in 
the Company.

The Chairman has no other significant 
commitments as regards employment or 
directorships of other companies.

Non-executive directors

Sir David Grant is the Senior Independent 
Director and is available to discuss 
material concerns with shareholders 
should the normal channels of the 
Chairman and Chief Executive or the 
Group Finance Director fail to resolve such 
concerns. The non-executive directors 
meet without the executive directors 
present to discuss performance and 
other matters.

B. Effectiveness
Composition of the Board

All the non-executive directors are 
considered by the Board to be 
independent in character and judgement 
and there are no relationships or 
circumstances that are likely to affect a 
non-executive director’s judgement.

Sir David Grant is currently the senior 
independent director of IQE plc (having 
been appointed in September 2012), 
chair of STEMNET (appointed in 
December 2011), chair of the National 
Physical Laboratory (appointed in May 
2015) and on the board of the Defence 
Science and Technology Laboratory 
(Dstl) (appointed in June 2012). He was 
previously Vice-Chancellor of Cardiff 
University from October 2001 to August 
2012. The Company has dealings with 
these organisations from time to time, 
such as grant-funded research projects, 
or research, collaboration or supply 
agreements. The Company confirms 
that Sir David Grant has taken no 
part in decisions relating to any of the 
dealings between the Company and 
these organisations.

John Jeans was chair of the Council of 
Cardiff University from December 2011 
until December 2015, is chair of Innovate 
UK’s Stratified Medicine Steering Group 
(having been appointed in February 2014) 
and was chair of MRC Technology from 
December 2008 until November 2014. 
John has also been since March 2016 
interim Chair of the Scottish Medical 
Device Hub at Strathclyde University. 
The Company has dealings with these 
organisations from time to time, such 
as grant-funded research projects, 
or research, collaboration or supply 
agreements. The Company confirms that 
John Jeans has taken no part in decisions 
relating to any of the dealings between the 
Company and these organisations.

The dealings referred to above are not 
material (i.e., in aggregate they are less 
than 0.5% of the Company’s revenue for 
the financial year ended 30th June 2016).

The Code recommends that at least 
half the Board, excluding the Chairman, 
should comprise independent non-
executive directors. The Board has 
complied with this requirement during 
the period.

Appointments to the Board

A description of the structure and activities 
of the Nomination Committee are set out 
in the Nomination Committee report on 
page 76.

Commitment

The terms of appointment of the non-
executive directors, which includes 
the expected time commitment and 
requirement to discuss any changes 
to other significant commitments with 
the Chairman and Chief Executive in 
advance, are available for inspection at 
the AGM and the registered office upon 
written request.

None of the executive directors hold a 
directorship in a FTSE 100 company.

Development

Directors are offered the opportunity 
to attend formal training courses to 
update their knowledge of their duties as 
directors. Guidance notes, papers and 
presentations on changes to law and 
regulations are provided as appropriate. 
Non-executive directors are invited 
to attend internal conferences, which 
provide information to the Group on new 
product development and marketing 
initiatives, as well as our investor days. 
Business presentations are given at board 
meetings to provide updates on, and 
opportunities to discuss, products and 
business strategies.

An induction pack is provided to new 
appointees to the Board, and the 
induction programme (together with the 
continuing development programme) 
includes site visits and briefings by senior 
managers, attendance at internal senior 
management conferences and external 
trade shows, as well as foreign subsidiary 
visits, as applicable. For example, this 
year, non-executive directors visited 
Renishaw’s Miskin facility for the annual 
investor day and attended strategy days, 
as well as a board meeting at Renishaw’s 
Stone premises. This has facilitated a 
deeper understanding of the Group, 
leadership team and Renishaw’s products 
and markets.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201673

Information and support

The Board receives appropriate 
documentation, management accounts, 
forecasts and commentaries thereon 
in advance of each board meeting 
to enable its members to review the 
financial performance of the Group, 
current trading and key business 
initiatives. Regular financial updates 
are also provided between meetings. 
The Company Secretary advises the 
Board on all governance matters. 
All directors have access to the 
Company Secretary and to independent 
professional advice at the Company’s 
expense where necessary to discharge 
their responsibilities as directors. 
The appointment and removal of the 
Company Secretary is a matter reserved 
for the Board.

Evaluation

The Board and its committees undertake 
an annual evaluation of their performance. 
The format of the evaluation varies 
each year. 

The 2015 evaluation focused on 
improving the rolling forward agenda 
process and succession planning, 
including overseas senior management. 
For 2016, Equity Communications Limited 
(which assisted with the last externally 
facilitated evaluation in 2013) undertook 
interviews with the directors, discussing 
a list of subjects agreed by the Board. 
The results of this evaluation will be 
discussed early in the new financial year. 
Equity Communications Limited has no 
other connection with the Company.

Re-election

In accordance with the Code all the 
directors will retire from the Board at the 
next AGM and will offer themselves up for 
re-election or election (as the case may 
be) at the AGM.

C. Accountability
Financial and business reporting

The respective responsibilities of the 
directors and auditor in connection with 
the financial statements are explained in 
Directors’ responsibilities on page 90 and 
the Independent auditor’s report on pages 
91 to 93.

Fair, balanced and understandable

The directors consider that the Annual 
report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced 
and understandable, and provides the 
information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s performance, 
business model and strategy.

Going concern

The Group’s strategy for delivering its 
objectives and business model, together 
with the factors likely to affect its future 
development and performance are set 
out in the Strategic report, where details 
of the financial and liquidity positions are 
also given. In addition, note 20 to the 
financial statements includes the Group’s 
objectives and policies for managing its 
capital, details of its financial instruments 
and hedging activities and its exposures 
to credit risk and liquidity risk.

The Group has considerable financial 
resources at its disposal and the 
directors have considered the current 
financial projections. As a consequence, 
the directors believe that the Group 
is well placed to manage its business 
risks successfully.

After making enquiries, the directors have 
a reasonable expectation that both the 
Company and the Group have adequate 
resources to continue in operation for the 
next twelve months. Accordingly, they 
continue to adopt the going concern 
basis in preparing the Annual report 
and accounts.

Viability statement

The Board undertakes an annual review 
of the corporate strategy, which includes 
medium term financial forecasts and an 
assessment of the major risks facing the 
business. In addition, current financial year 
forecasts are reviewed regularly by the 
Board, underpinned by regular briefings 
from its business sectors and subsidiaries 
on progress. The corporate strategy 
provides the foundations for monitoring of 
performance, budgets, risk and strategic 
actions by the Board.

The Board confirms that its assessment 
during the year of the principal risks 
facing the Group, including those that 
would threaten its business model, future 
performance, solvency and/or liquidity, 
and which are set out in the Group’s 
Principal risks and uncertainties on 
pages 50 to 51, was robust. In making 
the assessment, severe but plausible 
scenarios have been considered that 
estimate the potential impact of the 
principal risks on the financial forecasts 
over the assessment period.

In accordance with provision C.2.2 of the 
Code, whilst the Board has no reason 
to believe the Group will not be viable 
over a longer period, the period over 
which the Board considers it possible to 
form a reasonable expectation as to the 
Group’s longer-term viability, based on the 
risk and sensitivity analysis undertaken, 
is the three-year period to 30th June 
2019, taking account of the Group’s 
current position, financial forecasts, 
future prospects and the potential impact 
of the Principal risks and uncertainties 
documented in the Strategic report. 
The Board believes that a three-year 
viability assessment period is appropriate 
as the timeframe is covered by the 
Group’s corporate strategy, takes account 
of the Group’s short order book and 
together with the planning process set 
out above, it gives management and the 
Board sufficient, realistic visibility on the 
future in the context of the industry and 
world economic environment.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report74

Directors' corporate governance report (continued)

On the basis of the above and other 
matters considered and reviewed by the 
Board during the year, the Board has a 
reasonable expectation that the Group 
will be able to continue in operation and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due over the 
period to 30th June 2019. In assessing 
the Group’s viability over the next three 
years, it is recognised that all future 
assessments are subject to a level of 
uncertainty that increases for the later 
part of the assessment period and that 
future outcomes cannot be guaranteed 
or predicted with any certainty.

Risk management and internal 
control

The Board is responsible for the 
Company’s systems of risk management 
and internal control, and for reviewing 
their effectiveness. Any system of internal 
control is designed to manage rather 
than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve 
business objectives and can only provide 
reasonable and not absolute assurance 
against material misstatement or loss.

There are defined lines of responsibility and 
delegation of authorities. Established and 
centrally documented control procedures 
also exist, including, for example, capital 
and other expenditure, information 
and technology security and legal and 
regulatory compliance. These are applied 
throughout the Group.

The Group internal audit function provides 
independent and objective assurance that 
the control procedures are appropriate 
and effectively applied. The Group Audit 
Manager attends Audit Committee 
meetings to present annual internal audit 
plans and the results of such internal 
audits. Actions are monitored by the Audit 
Committee on an ongoing basis.

There is an established process for the 
review of business risks throughout the 
Group which has been enhanced in 2016 
by the formation of an executive risk 
committee as explained on page 48.

The Board ensures that there are 
effective internal controls over the 
financial reporting and consolidation 
processes. Monthly accounts and 
forecasts are presented to the Board for 
review. The Group internal audit function 
undertakes a review of subsidiaries’ 
accounting processes and performance 
to provide assurance to the Board on the 
integrity of the information supplied by 
each company forming part of the Group’s 
consolidated results.

The Board undertakes an annual 
formal review of the effectiveness of 
the Group’s system of internal controls 
and an updated risk and controls 
analysis. The review covers all material 
controls, including financial, operational 
and compliance controls and risk 
management systems.

The Board has conducted a robust 
assessment of the principal risks facing 
the Group, including those that would 
threaten its business model, future 
performance, solvency or liquidity. 
The Board is satisfied that there is an 
ongoing process for identifying, evaluating 
and managing the significant risks facing 
the Group, that it has been in place 
during the year, is regularly reviewed and 
accords with the FRC guidance on risk 
management and control. The Board 
confirms that necessary action has been 
or is being taken to remedy any significant 
failings or weaknesses identified from 
its review.

Audit Committee and auditor

A description of the structure and activities 
of the Audit Committee are set out in the 
Audit Committee report on pages 77 
to 79.

D. Remuneration
The Directors’ remuneration report 
explains how the Company applies the 
Code principles relating to remuneration.

E. Relations with shareholders
Dialogue with shareholders

The Board announced a new policy 
in the 2013 Annual report. No private 
meetings will be held other than 
shareholder meetings with the Chairman, 
Senior Independent Director and/or any 
other non-executive director where a 
shareholder has material issues, concerns 
or questions. The director attending 
such a meeting will communicate the 
shareholder’s issues, concerns or 
questions to the Board. The Board’s 
response will be published on the 
Renishaw website for the benefit of 
all shareholders where appropriate. 
The interim and annual results and 
presentations are posted on the website 
promptly after announcement of the 
results to the UK Listing Authority via 
an RIS.

Open webcasts of presentations on 
annual and half-year results are held 
and recordings of the presentations and 
the subsequent question and answer 
sessions made available after the webcast 
on the Company’s website. Analysts’ and 
brokers’ reports will be circulated to the 
Board. The Board intends to hold open 
discussions with any shareholder who 
wishes to share views with the directors 
at the AGM or the annual investor day at 
which presentations on group strategy, 
business segments and product lines 
will be given by members of the Board 
and senior management, as well as 
tours covering the Group’s activities. 
This year, 72 visitors attended the 
Company’s investor day, which included 
various Q&A sessions with the Board 
during the day as well as an opportunity 
to ask questions during tours, lunch 
and refreshment breaks.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201675

Constructive use of the AGM

The AGM takes place at the Company’s 
headquarters or one of the Company’s 
other sites and formal notification is sent 
to the shareholders at least 20 working 
days before the meeting. A business 
presentation is given and all directors are 
available for questions during and after 
the meeting, including the chairs of the 
Audit, Remuneration and Nomination 
Committees. Tours of the Company’s 
facilities are offered.

Separate resolutions are proposed for 
each substantially separate issue, and 
all resolutions will be taken on a poll. 
The Company reports on the number 
of votes lodged on each resolution, the 
balance for and against each resolution 
and the number of votes withheld. 
This information is published via an RIS 
and on the Company’s website following 
the meeting.

Disclosure rule DTR 7.2.6 R
The information regarding share capital 
required to be disclosed by this rule is 
contained in the Other statutory and 
regulatory disclosures.

Board and committee meeting 
attendance record
Shown against each director’s name in the 
table below is the number of scheduled 
meetings of the Board and its committees 
at which the director was present, and, 
in brackets, the number of meetings that 
the director was eligible to attend during 
the year.

Compliance statement
The Board considers that it has complied 
with the requirements of the Code 
throughout the year except in relation 
to the following matter (the reasons 
for non-compliance are stated in the 
report above):

•  the combined role of Chairman and 

Chief Executive (Code provision A.2.1).

Sir David Grant
Senior Independent Director 
27th July 2016

Board attendance record
Meetings

The following table sets out attendance at the scheduled meetings of the Board and committees during the year. There were two 
ad hoc Board meetings which were called on short notice, which are not included in this table.

Director
Sir David McMurtry
D J Deer
B R Taylor
A C G Roberts
G McFarland
C T Chesney
K L Durrant
Sir David Grant
D J Jeans

Board
10 (10)
10 (10)
10 (10)
10 (10)
10 (10)
10 (10)
9 (10)1
10 (10)
10 (10)

Audit  
Committee
–
–
–
–
–
4 (4)
–
4 (4)
4 (4)

Remuneration  
Committee
–
–
–
–
–
4 (4)
4 (4)
3 (4)2
4 (4)

Nomination  
Committee
1 (1)
–
–
–
–
1 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)

1  One of the Board meetings was postponed on short notice due to a family bereavement but it was not possible for Kath Durrant to change prior arrangements to attend 
the re-scheduled meeting.

2  As Sir David Grant had prior commitments elsewhere, he was unable to attend this committee meeting due to a delayed close to the Board meeting that immediately 
preceded it.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report76

Nomination Committee report

 The Nomination Committee has an important role in leading 
the process for Board appointments and ensuring that the Board 
has the correct balance of experience, diversity and skills to 

support our business model and strategy. 

Sir David R McMurtry, Chairman and Chief Executive
Chair of the Nomination Committee

Nomination Committee role 
and composition
The Nomination Committee, which 
meets on an ad hoc basis as required, 
is responsible for reviewing the size, 
structure and composition of the Board, 
including its balance of skills, knowledge 
and experience and for nominating 
candidates for appointment to the Board.

The members of the Nomination 
Committee are Sir David McMurtry (Chair), 
Carol Chesney, Kath Durrant, Sir David 
Grant and John Jeans. The majority 
of the members of this committee are 
independent non-executive directors. 
The terms of reference of this committee 
are published on the Company’s website.

Activities during the year
The committee met once during the year 
to consider and propose the appointment 
of Will Lee to the Board as Group Sales 
and Marketing Director. Will has been 
a long-standing member of the senior 
leadership team in a number of roles at 
Renishaw and was appointed Director 
of Group Sales and Marketing during the 
year, working with Ben Taylor to take over 
Ben’s sales and marketing duties in his 
transition to retirement on 31st July 2016. 
The appointment was confirmed on 27th 
July 2016 and takes effect on 1st August 
2016. The committee believes that Will 
has the required skills and experience 
to provide an invaluable contribution to 
the Board.

In relation to non-executive positions, 
the four non-executive directors were 
all appointed within the last four years 
and the Board considers that they are 
working effectively together in order to 
support the Board and the Company. 
Consequently there were no further 
appointments or changes considered 
necessary during the year other than 
to appoint Kath Durrant as Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee.

Boardroom diversity
The Board has considered the 
recommendations of the “Women on 
Boards” report issued by Lord Davies of 
Abersoch, and his subsequent annual 
reviews, as regards setting out aspirations 
for the appointment of women to boards, 
and has decided that it is inappropriate 
to set out any levels that may require 
positive discrimination in this respect, as 
the overriding requirement is to appoint 
directors with the necessary skills and 
experience for the role.

However, as an international company, 
the Board acknowledges that diversity of 
all types is a benefit and should be borne 
in mind when recruiting to all roles within 
the Company, and has a policy to provide 
equal opportunities to all. The Board’s 
policy is to request, where recruitment 
consultants are appointed for board 
appointment, that a proportion of female 
candidates are included in their shortlist.

Sir David R McMurtry
Chair of the Nomination Committee
27th July 2016

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201677

Audit Committee report

Audit Committee role and 
composition
The Audit Committee is appointed by the 
Board from the non-executive directors 
of the Company. The Audit Committee’s 
terms of reference include all matters 
indicated by Disclosure and Transparency 
Rule 7.1 and the Code. The terms of 
reference are considered annually by the 
Audit Committee and any changes are 
recommended to the Board for approval.

The Audit Committee reviews the Group’s 
accounting policies and procedures, its 
annual and interim financial statements 
before submission to the Board and its 
compliance with statutory requirements. 
The committee monitors the integrity 
of the Group’s financial statements and 
announcements relating to financial 
performance and reviews the significant 
reporting judgements contained therein. 
It also reviews the scope, remit and 
effectiveness of the internal control 
systems and internal audit function. 

The Audit Committee comprises three 
non-executive directors; Carol Chesney 
(Chair), Sir David Grant and John Jeans. 
The Board is satisfied that at least one 
member of the committee has recent 
and relevant financial experience, being 
Carol Chesney. The terms of reference are 
available on the Company’s website.

Meetings
The committee meets at least three times 
a year with the Group Finance Director, 
the Group Financial Controller, the Group 
Audit Manager, the Company Secretary 
and the external auditor in attendance. 
At least one meeting, or part thereof, is 
held with the external auditor without 
executive directors present. This year the 
committee met four times; further details 
are on page 78.

 The Audit Committee has a vital role to play in ensuring the integrity of our 
financial statements, the effectiveness of our risk management processes 
and internal controls, and in evaluating the performance of the external audit 
process. During 2016 we also monitored the various changes to the Code, 
agreed the content of the viability statement and recommended to the Board 
that Ernst & Young LLP be appointed as the external auditor for the 2017 

financial year, subject to shareholder approval at the AGM. 

Carol Chesney, Non-executive director
Chair of the Audit Committee

Member Financial experience

Company and position

Sector

Sector experience

Carol  
Chesney

Sir David  
Grant

John  
Jeans

Chartered accountant

Company Secretary at Halma plc 

Technology

Worked at Arthur 
Anderson for 7 years 

Previously Group 
Financial Controller at 
Halma plc

Senior Independent  
Director of IQE plc

Director of Dstl

Chair of NPL

Technology

Technology

Metrology

Previously worked for Dowty Group

Manufacturing

Previously Group Technical Director of 
GEC plc
Previously Vice-President of the Royal 
Academy of Engineering

Engineering

Engineering

Chair of Imanova 

Imaging services

Chair of UK Biocentre 

Healthcare

Chair of Edinburgh Molecular Imaging  Biotechnology

Non-executive director of ProMetic SMT Biopharmaceuticals

Member of the Ministerial Committee 
on Medical Technologies
Advisor to the Prime Minister at the 
Office of Life Sciences

Biotechnology

Medical technology

Previously worked for Smith & Nephew  Medical equipment

Previously President of Dravon Medical 
(Smith & Nephew)
Previously Senior Vice President of 
Zimmer (Bristol-Myers Squibb)
Previously President at Ortho Clinical 
Diagnostics International (Johnson 
& Johnson)
Previously Chairman at GE 
Healthcare Ltd

Medical equipment

Healthcare

Medical diagnostics

Healthcare

Key issues and activities
In addition to reviewing the financial 
reporting of the Company, the committee 
also spends a significant amount of time 

reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s 
internal control processes and its internal 
and external audit activities.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report78

Audit Committee report (continued)

The principal activities in the year:  

Financial statements  
and reports

•  Reviewed the effectiveness of the 
Group’s risk management and 
internal controls and disclosures 
made in the 2016 Annual report;

•  reviewed the 2016 Annual report, 
the 2016 Interim report and all 
other trading updates issued 
during the year. The committee 
received a report from the 
external auditor on the audit of 
the 2016 Annual report; 

•  reviewed areas of the accounts 
requiring judgement including 
the carrying value of goodwill, 
the carrying value of inventory, 
capitalisation of internally 
generated development costs, 
amortisation of intangible 
assets, debtor provisions, 
warranty provisions and 
taxation provisions;

•  reviewed the accounting and 
disclosures in relation to the 
Group’s defined benefit pension 
schemes; and

•  reviewed the content of the 

viability statement (see below).

Risk management

Internal audit

External auditor and  
non-audit work 

•  Reviewed the output from the 
Group’s risk review process to 
identify, evaluate and mitigate 
risks and considered whether 
changes in risk profile were 
adequately addressed;

•  received updates on compliance 
with the Group’s anti-bribery and 
corruption policy; 

•  reviewed proposals to enhance 

the Group’s whistleblowing policy 
and process which will include 
an external reporting facility for 
employees; and

•  reviewed the Group’s proposed 
approach to compliance with 
the requirements of the Modern 
Slavery Act.

•  Evaluated the scope of work to 
be undertaken by the internal 
audit function;

•  Undertook a tender for 

the 2017 group external 
audit service;

•  reviewed progress on 

recommendations brought 
forward and considered 
recommendations arising during 
the year; and

•  reviewed, considered and 
agreed the scope and 
methodology of the 2016 audit 
work to be undertaken by the 
external auditor;

•  considered the resource 

•  evaluated the independence 

levels available to the internal 
audit function.

and objectivity of the 
external auditor;

•  agreed the terms of 

engagement and the fees to 
be paid to the external auditor 
for the audit of the 2016 
financial statements;

•  reviewed the level and nature of 
non-audit services provided by 
the external auditor;

•  undertook an effectiveness 
review of the external audit 
process; and

•  reviewed and approved 

updates to the non-audit 
services policy.

The committee agreed the content of the viability statement following a thorough review process which included an assessment of the 
potential downside impact of the Group’s principal risks. The viability statement is set out on page 73.

Risk management and internal 
controls
The committee monitors the effectiveness 
of the Group’s internal controls and risk 
management processes which allows it 
to maintain a good understanding of the 
business performance and key areas of 
judgement and decision making within 
the Group.

Details of risk management and internal 
controls are set out on page 48 and 49 
and page 74.

Fair, balanced and 
understandable report and 
accounts
One of the key governance requirements 
is for the Annual report to be fair, balanced 
and understandable. Ensuring that this 
standard is met requires continuous 
assessment of the financial reporting 
issues affecting the Group on a year-
round basis in addition to a number of 
focused exercises that take place during 
the accounts production process within a 
strict timeframe.

An extensive verification exercise was 
undertaken to ensure the factual accuracy 
of the Annual report by the Board and 
senior management. An advanced draft of 
the Annual report was considered by the 
committee at its meeting on 6th July 2016 
with a final draft being reviewed on 22nd 
July 2016, prior to it being presented to 
the Board. Following those discussions, 
the committee advised the Board that the 
Annual report, taken as a whole, is fair, 
balanced and understandable.

The directors’ statement on a fair, 
balanced and understandable Annual 
report is set out on page 73.

Significant issues in relation to 
the financial statements
As part of the reporting and review 
process, the committee has regular 
discussions with management and the 
external auditor relating to significant 
issues. During the year the committee 
considered the significant issues set 
out below in relation to the financial 
statements. Also contained below is 

a commentary on how these issues 
were addressed:

i) The carrying value of goodwill

The committee focused on the impairment 
testing by the Company of the carrying 
value of goodwill. By applying knowledge 
and making enquiries of the relevant cash-
generating units, reviewing the forecasts 
and the sensitivity analysis, the committee 
agreed with the conclusion reached that 
no impairments were required.

ii) The carrying value of inventory

Provisions are made to write down 
slow-moving and obsolete inventory 
items to net realisable value, based on 
an assessment of technological and 
market developments and on an analysis 
of historic and projected demand. 
The assessment used to calculate the 
provisions needed requires the application 
of judgement by management.

The committee received confirmation from 
management that the approach used to 
determine the provision was consistent 
with the previous year and made enquiries 

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201679

of management to gain an understanding 
of how business developments, both 
technological and market-driven, had 
impacted the provision during the year. 

•  global coverage for the 

Company’s subsidiaries; 

•  value for money; 

The external auditor explained to the 
committee the work they had performed 
in respect of the carrying value of 
goodwill and inventory provisions during 
the year. The committee was satisfied 
that management judgements were 
appropriate and that the carrying value of 
goodwill and the inventory provision were 
appropriately stated at the year end.

Approach to auditor 
appointment and audit quality
The committee has primary responsibility 
for making the recommendation on 
the appointment, reappointment and 
removal of the external auditor, which 
the Board puts to shareholders for 
approval at the AGM. KPMG LLP and 
its predecessor firms have been auditor 
since 1974 and the lead audit partner 
has changed in line with their internal 
rotation requirements. During the year the 
external audit contract for 2017 was put 
out to tender. KPMG LLP was not invited 
to tender which will allow the group to 
use KPMG LLP for non-audit services 
which are prohibited under the latest EU 
audit regulation. Additionally the tender 
coincided with the mandatory rotation of 
the KPMG LLP lead partner. 

The committee agreed the tender process 
and approved a Request for Proposal 
(RFP) document which was sent to 
selected firms. Services, such as tax 
compliance and advice, were not within 
the scope of the RFP.

The committee, together with the 
Group Finance Director, the Group 
Audit Manager and the Group Financial 
Controller, reviewed the proposals which 
culminated in presentations by each firm. 
The committee considered the following 
aspects in arriving at its recommendation 
to the Board:

•  skills and knowledge of the team 

proposed to do the work; 

•  independence of the audit firm from 

the Company; 

•  audit partner rotation and 
succession planning; 

•  audit approach and methodology 

including the use of data 
analytic techniques; 

•  internal governance processes; 

•  transition plan;

•  verbal references for senior members of 

the proposed audit teams;

•  technical capabilities of the firm as a 

whole; and 

•  ethical behaviour and fair dealing. 

Following the review, the committee made 
a recommendation to the Board that Ernst 
& Young LLP be appointed as the external 
auditor for the 2017 financial year, subject 
to shareholder approval at the AGM in 
October this year.

When the committee assesses the 
effectiveness of the external audit 
process and the quality of the audit work 
throughout the year it considers:

•  any issues arising from the prior 

year audit; 

•  the proposed audit plan including 
the identification of risks specific 
to the Group, audit scope and 
materiality thresholds; 

•  feedback from executive management, 

including the review of a report 
presented by the Group Finance 
Director, Group Financial Controller 
and the Group Audit Manager on 
the effectiveness of the external 
audit process;

•  the delivery of the audit in line with 

the plan; 

•  the communication of matters arising 
during the audit to the committee; 

•  private meetings with the auditor 

without management being present; 
and

•  the independence and objectivity of 

the auditor. 

Independence of external 
auditor
In order to safeguard the independence 
and objectivity of the external auditor, 
the committee reviews the nature and 
extent of the non-audit services supplied, 
receiving reports on the balance of 
audit to non-audit fees. For 2016, the 
committee regarded it most cost efficient 
to use the external auditor for tax advice 
and compliance since this requires an 
in-depth knowledge and understanding 
of the Company’s business, products, 
customer base and markets. 

Beyond 2016, tax advice and compliance 
will not be undertaken by the external 
auditor. The non-audit services policy has 
been updated in the year to reflect the 
extended list of prohibited services as 
set out in the latest EU audit regulation. 
There are also specified services which 
require the prior approval of the Group 
Finance Director and Chair of the Audit 
Committee before the auditor may be 
appointed to provide such services. 
In addition, there are specified levels of 
authorisation to be obtained before the 
auditor may be permitted to tender for 
non-audit services.

An analysis of fees paid to KPMG LLP, 
including the split between audit and  
non-audit services, is included in note 5 
to the group financial statements.

Other matters
The committee reviews the policy by 
which employees of the Company may, 
in confidence, raise matters of concern, 
including possible improprieties in 
financial reporting or other matters. It was 
recommended to the Board that this 
policy is enhanced in the early part of next 
financial year by the implementation of 
an external reporting line. It also monitors 
the effectiveness of the Company’s 
procedures to avoid any bribery related to 
the activities of the Group.

Carol Chesney
Chair of the Audit Committee
27th July 2016

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report80

Directors’ remuneration report

 I am pleased to have taken over as Chair of this committee 
as we continue to further develop senior management talent, 
performance management processes and executive director 

remuneration policies and governance. 

Kath Durrant, Chair of the Remuneration committee

Remuneration Committee 
role and composition
The Remuneration Committee is 
responsible for deciding the Company’s 
framework of executive director 
remuneration and setting remuneration 
packages for each of the executive 
directors. The committee’s policy is to 
motivate and retain executive directors 
by rewarding them with competitive 
salary, benefit packages and incentives. 
These are linked to the overall 
performance of the Group and, in turn, 
to the interests of the shareholders.

The committee reviews annually the 
executive directors’ remuneration in the 
context of the Group’s performance 
during the year.

The committee also reviews the 
remuneration structure and packages 
for the next level of senior leaders across 
the business to ensure appropriate 
competitiveness, equity and progression 
for those identified as potential successors 
to the Board and senior executive team.

All the members of the committee are 
non-executive directors, comprising Kath 
Durrant (Chair), Sir David Grant, Carol 
Chesney and John Jeans. The terms 
of reference of the committee are 
published on the Company’s website. 
Executive directors only attend meetings 
of the committee by invitation for 
parts of the agenda as appropriate. 
Independent advisors are used 
as required.

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to 
present the Directors’ remuneration report 
for 2016.

The report continues to comply with the 
requirements for reporting on directors’ 
pay introduced in October 2013 and is 
split into the following three sections:

1.  A statement from the Chair of the 

Remuneration Committee; 

During the year, the committee approved 
executive directors’ base salaries for 
2016, which rose in line with increases 
typical for UK staff; no bonus was 
payable to executive directors in 2016, 
the thresholds for payment not having 
been met. The committee approved a 
new remuneration package for Will Lee in 
respect of his appointment to the Board 
as Group Sales and Marketing Director.

The committee also reviewed and 
approved the Chairman and Chief 
Executive's expenses.

As indicated in last year's report, the 
committee commenced a review of 
executive remuneration and this year, 
worked with Kepler, who advised on 
remuneration governance and conducted 
a benchmarking of remuneration for 
the senior leadership group, including 
executive directors. The committee 
have made the benchmarking available 
to management within the Company, 
with guidelines for its ongoing use.
The committee has also reviewed the 
quality of performance management 
processes with the Company and made 
recommendations on strengthening that 
process further.

2.  The remuneration policy table (pages 

82 and 83) which was approved at the 
AGM on 16th October 2014 for a three-
year period; and 

3.  An annual report on remuneration, 
setting out information on directors’ 
remuneration paid during the year.

Remuneration Committee 
activities during the year
During 2016 Sir David Grant stepped 
down from the role of Remuneration 
Committee Chair, and I was pleased 
to step into the role. 2016 was a more 
challenging year for the Company when 
compared to the exceptional performance 
of 2015, where the Company benefited 
from large orders from the Far East. 
Nevertheless, underlying growth of 5.6% 
in core businesses demonstrates the 
resilience of Renishaw, and should be 
noted positively.

The Remuneration Committee’s approach 
continues to be to align executive 
director remuneration with the Group’s 
performance, using clear and simple 
remuneration structures.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201681

In relation to setting remuneration for 
the next financial year, the committee 
has taken into account the cyclical 
nature of the market, the performance 
of the Company over time, the present 
uncertain economic environment and the 
remuneration conditions within the Board 
and the overseas markets in which 
we operate. With respect to executive 
director bonus targets, the committee 
has agreed with the Company the 
long-term strategic profitable growth 
ambitions for Renishaw, which in 
turn underpin bonus arrangements. 
In addition to the usual measure of profit 
before tax, the committee has decided 
to introduce an additional measure 
related to prudent management of cash.

Renishaw’s executive directors do not 
participate in a long-term incentive plan 
(LTIP). The Remuneration Committee 
recognises that this is unusual compared 
with many other companies, and we 
therefore question annually whether 
Renishaw’s performance would be 
enhanced through the introduction of 
such a scheme. At present there are no 
proposals to introduce such a scheme.

The committee considers it essential 
that the Group can assure its ability 
to attract and retain talent, in different 
markets and in both established and 
emerging businesses. As a result, the 
committee will carefully consider the 
potential changes to the remuneration 
policy of the Company (including, but 
not confined to long-term incentive 
proposals) in readiness for policy re-
approval in October 2017, to ensure 
it remains able to attract and retain 
talent of the right calibre over the 
coming years.

Kath Durrant
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
27th July 2016

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report82

Directors’ remuneration report (continued)

REMUNERATION POLICY
The Company’s remuneration policy for executive and non-executive directors was approved by shareholders at the AGM on 16th 
October 2014 for a three-year period. No change will be proposed at the AGM on 13th October 2016.

Key extracts of the policy are provided below for information purposes only. The full policy can be found on our investor relations 
website (downloads and video section) within the 2014 Directors’ remuneration report, contained in the 2014 Annual report.

Executive directors’ policy table
Set out below is a table describing each component of the remuneration package applicable to the executive directors.

*   The page reference change below under the maximum column was updated in the table for information only in order to be factually correct, since the table has been 

reproduced from the 2014 Annual report (as explained above).

Element of 
remuneration
Base salary

Purpose and relevance 
to strategy
To provide a competitive fixed 
salary to motivate and retain 
executive directors of the 
required quality to meet the 
Group’s objectives.

Benefits

To provide market- 
competitive benefits to 
motivate and retain executive 
directors of the required 
quality to meet the Group’s 
objectives and to support 
them to give maximum 
attention to their role.

Bonus

To incentivise and 
reward execution of the 
Group’s objectives.

Operation
Renishaw aims to pay the base rate 
salary at least at the current median 
market rate or above, as compared to 
the equivalent job position/ level in the 
relevant industrial sector(s) applicable to 
Renishaw, as defined in the appropriate 
benchmarking pay surveys, statistics 
and peer comparisons (such peer 
selection to include factors such as size 
and location).

Base salary is reviewed annually 
taking into account the award for the 
UK workforce.

Benefits provided on an ongoing basis 
include the following principal benefits:

•  a car or car allowance;

•  private medical insurance;

•  life assurance;

•  long-term disability cover; and

•  home telephone costs.

If, on the recruitment of a new executive 
director, relocation is required to the 
director’s place of work, relocation 
support which is regarded by the 
committee to be necessary to provide 
appropriate support to the director will 
be provided to cover items such as 
transaction and legal fees, removals 
and temporary accommodation and 
subsistence costs.

The committee sets group performance 
targets, including a baseline below 
which no bonus is earned, with a bonus 
payable from that point, increasing on 
a straight-line basis to a target at which 
75% of salary would be earned and 
a cap at which a maximum 100% of 
salary would be earned.

Part or all of any bonus paid may be 
subject to repayment in the case of 
any financial misstatement, errors in 
calculation or gross misconduct.

Maximum
110% of median salaries 
in a comparator group as 
decided by the committee. 
Renishaw has historically 
paid base salaries that 
are higher than median, 
reflecting the lack of an 
LTIP (see Statement on 
page 81).*

The committee retains 
the discretion to make 
adjustments at the annual 
review to take into account 
matters affecting an 
individual director such as 
changes in responsibility 
and anomalies discovered 
during benchmarking.

Excluding accommodation 
and relocation costs, not to 
exceed £50k p/a.

Performance  
measures
To reflect the director’s role, 
performance and experience.

Not applicable.

100% of salary.

Based on group 
performance, primarily 
financial, but the committee 
may introduce non-financial 
metrics or make adjustments 
to reflect appropriate 
performance or competitive 
factors, provided that the 
bonus will always be subject 
to achievement of the 
baseline financial targets and 
such non-financial metrics 
shall not form more than 25% 
of the bonus opportunity.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201683

Executive directors’ policy table continued

Element of 
remuneration

Purpose and relevance 
to strategy

Operation

Pension

To provide a competitive 
pension as appropriate 
to motivate and retain 
executive directors of the 
required quality to meet the 
Group’s objectives.

Each of Allen Roberts, Ben Taylor and 
Geoff McFarland receive an additional 
payment of 15% of base salary, being 
the amount that would otherwise be 
contributed to a pension scheme on 
their behalf.

For any new executive director, 
annual contributions based on a 
percentage of base salary will be 
made to the Company’s defined 
contribution scheme or additional 
salary may be paid in lieu, as agreed by 
the committee.

Geoff McFarland is a deferred member 
of the Company’s defined benefit 
scheme which closed for future 
accruals on 5th April 2007.

Performance  
measures

Not applicable.

Maximum

The maximum contribution 
to the defined contribution 
scheme, or, where 
applicable, additional 
salary payment in lieu of 
contributions will be 15% of 
base salary.

Non-executive directors’ policy table
The remuneration of the non-executive directors is determined by the executive directors and consists of a fee only. There is no 
entitlement to any benefits, bonus, incentive plans or pension. Set out below is a table showing the fees for the non-executive 
directors of the Company:

Element of 
remuneration

Purpose and relevance 
to strategy

Operation

Fee

To provide a competitive 
fee to motivate and retain 
non-executive directors of the 
required quality to meet the 
Group’s objectives. 

The non-executive directors are 
paid the same fee, irrespective of 
membership of or acting as a Chair of 
a committee.

The fees are reviewed annually with 
reference to fees payable to non-
executive directors of companies of a 
similar size and complexity.

Reasonable expenses incurred in 
undertaking duties as a director 
are reimbursed.

Performance  
measures

Not applicable.

Maximum

The maximum fees 
payable will be set by the 
Company’s Articles of 
Association, currently an 
aggregate of £300,000 
per annum.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report84

Directors’ remuneration report (continued)

ANNUAL REMUNERATION REPORT
This section of the report sets out the remuneration of the directors in the year ended 30th June 2016.

Single total figure table (audited)

Sir David McMurtry
D J Deer
B R Taylor
A C G Roberts
G McFarland
C T Chesney
K L Durrant1
Sir David Grant
D J Jeans

Salary/fees

Benefits

Bonus

Pension

Total

2016
£’000
666
402
463
377
377
44
44
44
44

2015
£’000
648
392
451
367
367
43
22
43
43

2016
£’000
2
20
22
19
18
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2015
£’000
2
19
20
20
18
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2016
£’000
0
0
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2015
£’000
648
392
451
367
367
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2016
£’000
n/a
n/a
70
57
57
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2015
£’000
n/a
n/a
68
55
55
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

2016
£’000
668
422
555
453
452
44
44
44
44

2015
£’000
1,298
803
990
809
807
43
22
43
43

1 K L Durrant was appointed a director with effect from 1st January 2015.

Benefits

Sir David McMurtry
D J Deer
B R Taylor
A C G Roberts
G McFarland

Car
allowance
£’000
n/a
18
18
18
18

Private medical cover applies to all
executive directors and home telephone costs,
insurance on personal cars, M4 bridge toll fees,
US tax return advice is provided to certain directors
£’000
2
2
4
1
0

Bonus
For the year in question, the bonus 
was determined by group performance 
targets for the year, based on an adjusted 
profit before tax set at levels above the 
previous year’s profit before tax and with 
a threshold below which no bonus is 
earned. A target profit before tax set for 
the year in question enabled 75% of salary 
to be earned as a bonus. A further bonus 
could be earned based on performance 
subject to a maximum 100% of salary. 
No other performance measures were set.

Total pension entitlements
G McFarland is a member of the 
Company’s closed defined benefit 
scheme. At 30th June 2016, the value of 
the defined benefit pension entitlement 
was £28,641 per annum. The normal 
retirement age for G McFarland is 65. 
On death, pension benefits would pass 
to dependants.

Current year pension scheme 
contributions payable by the Company 
have been taken as cash.

The value of G McFarland’s defined 
contribution scheme at 30th June 2016 
was £425,277.

Payments to past directors
No payments were made to past directors 
during the year.

Loss of office payments
There was no termination of employment 
of directors during the year.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201685

1,000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Renishaw

FTSE mid 250

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Performance graph
The graph above shows the Company’s 
total shareholder return (TSR) 
performance, compared with the FTSE 
mid 250 index, which the directors believe 
is the most appropriate broad index 
for comparison.

The share price and the FTSE mid 250 
index have been rebased to 100 at 
1st July 2009. 

Executive directors serving 
as non-executive directors of 
other companies
During the year none of the executive 
directors served as a non-executive 
director of any other company in respect 
of which any remuneration was received.

Statement of directors’ 
shareholding and 
share interests
None of the directors are required to own 
shares in the Company. The interests of 
the directors who have served during 
the year in shares (including connected 
persons) are:

Sir David McMurtry
D J Deer
B R Taylor
A G Roberts
G McFarland
C T Chesney
K L Durrant 
Sir David Grant
D J Jeans

Number of ordinary 
shares of 20p each 
26,377,291
12,233,040
10,147
5,165
2,000
500
–
–
–

There were no share-based payments 
made or share schemes in place during 
the year.

Chief Executive 
total remuneration
The table below sets out information 
relating to Sir David McMurtry, who was 
the Chief Executive for each of the years 
in question:

Annual 
bonus 
payout 
against 
maximum 
opportunity 
%
0%
100%
0%
10%
69%
100%

Long-term 
incentive 
vesting rates 
against 
maximum 
opportunity 
%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Single figure 
of total 
remuneration 
(£‘000)
668
1,298
632
663
969
1,066

Year
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011

Percentage change in 
remuneration of the 
Chief Executive
The following table sets out a 
comparison of the percentage change 
in the Chief Executive’s remuneration 
to the percentage change in average 
remuneration of UK employees from 2015 
to 2016.

2016
£’000
666
2

2015
£’000
648
2

UK 
Chief 
employees 
Executive 
(average) 
% change
% change
+2.7% +4.0%
-2%

0%

0

648

-100%

-51%

Salary
Benefits
Annual 
bonus

UK employees have been chosen as a 
comparator group in order to avoid the 
impact of exchange rate movements over 
the year. UK employees make up 65% of 
the total number of group employees.

Relative importance of spend 
on pay
The following table sets out the total 
amount spent in the current financial year 
and the previous year on remuneration 
to all group employees and on dividends 
to shareholders:

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

change
% 

Employee 
remuneration 183,769 173,744
Shareholder 
dividends paid 33,847

30,841 +10%

+6%

Except as shown above, no other 
distributions have been made to 
shareholders or other payments or uses 
of profit or cash flow which impact on the 
understanding of the relative importance 
of spend on pay.

Statement of implementation 
of remuneration policy in the 
next year
The executive directors’ salaries will be 
increased by 2.2% for the 2017 financial 
year, which is in line with the UK workforce 
salary review. The bonus scheme targets 
have been set based on the policy as set 
out in the policy table.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report86

Directors’ remuneration report (continued)

Statement of voting at 
general meeting

At the annual general meeting held on 
15th October 2015, votes cast in respect 
of the Directors’ remuneration report were 
as follows:

Resolution
Approval of 
remuneration 
report

Votes for

% for

Votes  
against

%  
against

Total  
votes cast

Votes 
withheld

58,907,567

97.54% 1,487,278

2.46%  60,394,845 760,571

At the annual general meeting on 16th 
October 2014, votes cast by proxy in 
respect of the remuneration policy were 
as follows:

Resolution
Approval of 
remuneration 
policy

Votes for

% for

Votes  
against

%  
against

Total  
votes cast

Votes 
withheld

52,998,077

86.42% 8,323,776

13.57% 61,321,853 623,285

As the Company deems that a significant 
percentage of votes against as being 
more than 20%, as a result of which the 
Company would be required to provide 
in this report any reasons known to it 
for such a vote and any actions taken, 
no commentary is necessary in respect 
of the voting in respect of either of the 
above resolutions.

The report was approved by the Board 
of directors and has been signed on its 
behalf by:

Kath Durrant
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
27th July 2016

Consideration by directors 
of matters relating to 
directors’ remuneration
During the year, the Remuneration 
Committee considered the amount 
of the executive directors’ salary and 
the framework for the annual bonus. 
The members of the Remuneration 
Committee for this purpose were:

Sir David Grant (Chair until 10th 
May 2016)

C T Chesney 

D J Jeans

K L Durrant (Chair from 11th May 2016)

Kepler (a brand name and the executive 
remuneration advisory division of Mercer 
Limited) assisted the committee in 
reviewing and benchmarking the director 
and senior management remuneration 
arrangements. Total fees paid to 
Kepler during the year were £33,000. 
The committee is of the opinion that 
the advice received was objective and 
independent. Kepler were appointed by 
the committee as they were known to 
members of the committee. They have 
not advised the Company on any other 
matters. However, during the year, Mercer 
Limited’s actuarial advisory division 
provided advice to the trustees of the 
Company’s UK defined benefit pension 
scheme and in relation to the defined 
contribution scheme.

The Company Secretary acts as secretary 
to the committee.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
87

Other statutory and regulatory disclosures

Review of the business
A review of the business and likely future 
developments is given in the Chairman’s 
statement and the Strategic report. 
Segmental information by geographical 
market is given in note 2 to the 
financial statements.

The Group has established and acquired 
overseas manufacturing, marketing and 
distribution subsidiaries to manufacture 
some of the Group’s products and to 
provide support to customers in our major 
markets in the following regions outside 
the UK:

•  Europe: Denmark, Finland, Germany, 

Hungary, France, Italy, Spain, 
Switzerland, Netherlands, Czech 
Republic, Poland, Russia, Sweden 
and Austria;

•  Americas: USA, Mexico, Brazil 

and Canada;

•  Far East: Japan, Hong Kong, Australia, 
South Korea, People’s Republic of 
China, Singapore and Taiwan; and

•  other regions: India and Israel.

There are also representative offices in 
Turkey, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia and 
Thailand and an associate company in 
Slovenia, RLS, which is 50%-owned.

Also part of the Group is a subsidiary in 
Slovenia which designs and arranges 
the procurement of application-specific 
integrated circuits for the Group and RLS.

Further information is available on the 
Company’s website: www.renishaw.com.

Dividends
The directors propose a final dividend 
of £25,839,932 or 35.5p per share 
(2015: £24,748,105 or 34.0p per share) 
which, together with the interim dividend 
of £9,098,568 or 12.5p per share 
(2015: £9,098,568 or 12.5p) makes a 
total amount of dividends for the year 
of £34,938,500 or 48.0p per share, 
compared to £33,846,673 or 46.5p per 
share for the previous year.

Directors and their interests
The directors at the end of the year 
are listed on page 85 together with 
their interests in the share capital of the 
Company (with the equivalent number of 
voting rights), as notified to the Company.

All the interests were beneficially held 
with the exception of 2,434,411 shares 
(2015: 2,434,411 shares) which were non-
beneficially held by D J Deer but in respect 
of which he has voting rights.

There has been no change in the holdings 
shown on page 85 in the period 1st July 
2016 to 27th July 2016. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Code all 
directors will retire and, being eligible, 
offer themselves for re-election at the 
annual general meeting (AGM) to be 
held on 13th October 2016. Details of 
directors who offer themselves up for 
re-election or election, as the case may 
be, are shown on pages 66 and 67 and 
full biographical details are available at 
www.renishaw.com.

Sir David McMurtry, as one party, and 
D J Deer and Mrs M E Deer, as the other 
party, have entered into an agreement 
relating to the way each party would vote 
in respect of his or her shares if requested 
by the other party to do so. Under this 
agreement Sir David McMurtry, John Deer 
and Mrs Deer agree that (i) Mr and Mrs 
Deer will vote their shares in favour of any 
ordinary resolution if requested to do so 
by Sir David McMurtry and (ii) Sir David 
McMurtry will vote his shares against 
any special or extraordinary resolution 
if requested to do so by John Deer. 
The voting arrangement was renewed in 
2013 for a further period of five years and 
will terminate on the earlier of 25th May 
2018 and the deaths of both of Sir David 
McMurtry and John Deer. 

The rules on appointment, reappointment 
and retirement by rotation of the directors 
and their powers are set out in the 
Company’s Articles of Association. 
There are no powers given to the directors 
that are regarded as unusual.

Directors’ and officers’ 
indemnity insurance
Subject to the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006, the Company’s 
Articles of Association provide for the 
directors and officers of the Company 
to be appropriately indemnified. 
The Company maintains insurance for 
its directors and officers in respect of 
their acts and omissions during the 
performance of their duties.

Share capital and change 
of control
Details of the Company’s share capital, 
including rights and obligations, is given 
in note 19 to the financial statements. 
The Company is not a party to any 
significant agreements that might 
terminate upon a change of control of 
the Company.

A shareholder’s authority for the purchase 
by the Company of a maximum of 10% 
of its own shares was in existence during 
the 2016 financial year. However, the 
Company did not purchase any of its own 
shares during that time.

Auditor
Following selection by the Audit 
Committee as a result of a tender 
process, a resolution to appoint Ernst 
& Young LLP as the new auditor of 
the Company will be proposed at the 
forthcoming AGM.

Disclosure of information 
to auditor
The directors who held office at the date 
of approval of this statement confirm that, 
so far as they are each aware, there is 
no relevant audit information of which the 
Company’s auditor is unaware, and each 
director has taken all the steps that he 
or she ought to have taken as a director 
to make himself/herself aware of any 
relevant audit information and to establish 
that the Company’s auditor is aware of 
that information.

Annual general meeting
The notice convening the AGM and an 
explanation of the resolutions sought 
are set out in a separate circular. At the 
meeting, the Company will be seeking 
shareholder approval for, amongst 
other things, the ability to make market 
purchases of its own ordinary shares, 
up to a total of 10% of the issued share 
capital as well as the appointment of a 
new auditor. 

The directors consider that all the 
resolutions proposed are in the best 
interests of the Company and its 
shareholders as a whole and unanimously 
recommend that shareholders vote in 
favour of the resolutions, as they intend to 
do in respect of their own holdings.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report88

Other statutory and regulatory disclosures (continued)

Substantial shareholdings
Apart from the shareholdings (and 
corresponding voting rights) of Sir David 
McMurtry and John Deer (36.23% and 
16.80% respectively), the table below 
discloses the voting rights that have 
been notified to the directors under the 
requirements of the UK Listing Authority’s 
Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules 
DTR 5, which represent 3% or more of the 
voting rights attached to issued shares in 
the Company, as at 30th June 2016.

Substantial 
shareholdings
Baillie Gifford & Co
BlackRock Inc.
Capital Research 
and Management 
Company
Standard Life 
Investments 
Limited

% of issued
share 
capital

Number of 
shares
5.25% 3,846,993
4.92% 3,578,133

4.76% 3,465,730

4.99% 3,631,612

Research and development
The Group has a continuing commitment 
to a high level of research and 
development. The expenditure involved 
is directed towards the research and 
development of new products relating 
to metrology, including computer-aided 
design and manufacturing systems, and 
relating to healthcare products, including 
Raman spectroscopy systems, dental 
and craniomaxillofacial implants and 
certain areas in the medical devices field. 
Further information on the expenditure on 
research and development is contained in 
the financial review section of the Strategic 
report and the interview with Geoff 
McFarland on page 33.

Employees
The retention of highly-skilled employees is 
essential to the future of the business, and 
the directors place great emphasis on the 
continuation of the Company’s approved 
training policy. Health and safety matters 
are given special attention by the directors 
and well established systems of safety 
management are in place throughout 
the Group to safeguard employees, 
customers and visitors.

Employment policies are designed to 
provide equal opportunities irrespective of 
race, colour, religion, sex, age, disability or 
sexual orientation. Proper consideration 
is given to applications for employment 
from disabled people where suitable for 
appropriate vacancies. Employees who 
become disabled whilst with the Company 
will be given every opportunity to continue 
their employment through reasonable 
adjustment to their working conditions, 
equipment, or where this is not possible, 
re-training for other positions. They will 
also be afforded opportunities to continue 
training and gain promotion on the same 
basis as any other employee.

Details on information provided to 
employees on the performance of the 
business, consultation with employees 
and performance incentives are contained 
in the description of corporate social 
responsibility activities set out on pages 
52 to 61.

There are no agreements with employees 
providing for compensation for any loss 
of employment that occurs because of a 
takeover bid.

Donations
No political donations were made during 
the year.

Controlling shareholders’ 
arrangements
The Listing Rules require that premium 
listed companies with “controlling 
shareholders” (defined as a shareholder 
who individually or with any of their 
concert parties exercises or controls 30% 
or more of the votes able to be cast on 
all or substantially all the matters at the 
Company’s general meeting) must enter 
into a relationship agreement containing 
specific independence provisions.

The independence provisions required by 
the Listing Rules are that:

(i)  transactions and arrangements with 

the controlling shareholder (and/or any 
of its associates) will be conducted 
at arm’s length and on normal 
commercial terms;

(ii)  neither the controlling shareholder nor 

any of its associates will take any action 
that would have the effect of preventing 
the Company from complying with its 
obligations under the Listing Rules; and

(iii)  neither the controlling shareholder nor 
any of its associates will propose or 
procure the proposal of a shareholder 
resolution which is intended or appears 
to be intended to circumvent the 
proper application of the Listing Rules.

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201689

By virtue of his shareholding in the 
Company, Sir David McMurtry (Chairman 
and Chief Executive 36.2% shareholder) 
is a controlling shareholder. John Deer 
(Deputy Chairman, together with his wife, 
16.8%) is also a controlling shareholder by 
virtue of a long-standing voting agreement 
between John Deer (and his wife) with 
Sir David McMurtry. The Board confirms 
that the Company has not been able to 
enter into a relationship agreement with 
its controlling shareholders, containing 
the independence provisions required 
by the Listing Rules. The Financial 
Conduct Authority (FCA) has been 
notified of this, as required by the Listing 
Rules. The controlling shareholders 
have informed the Board that they are 
not willing to enter into a relationship 
agreement because they are of the view 
that the requirement to enter into the 
relationship agreement infringes upon 
their rights as shareholders and their track 
record demonstrates that they act in the 
best interests of the Company.

As a result of there being no relationship 
agreement in place, the Listing Rules 
provide that certain enhanced oversight 
measures will apply to the Company.

This means that, unless and to the 
extent that the FCA agrees otherwise, 
all transactions with the controlling 
shareholders must be approved by the 
Company’s shareholders (excluding the 
controlling shareholders) in accordance 
with the related party transaction 
requirements of the Listing Rules, and 
none of the normal exemptions apply.

Guidance has been received from 
the FCA about the application of the 
enhanced oversight measures to the 
remuneration and benefits received by the 
controlling shareholders in their capacity 
as executive directors (in accordance with 
the Company’s approved remuneration 
policy) as well other ordinary course 
corporate matters, such as the payment 
of dividends by the Company to all 
shareholders. The FCA confirmed that 
either these are not transactions or 
arrangements that fall within the enhanced 
oversight measures or that the FCA will 
permit a modification of the enhanced 
oversight measures so that they will not 
apply provided that the arrangements 
remain in the ordinary course of business 
and, in the case of salary reviews and 
bonuses, provided that they fall within the 
small transaction exemption in the Annex 
to LR 11.

Greenhouse gas emissions
The disclosures concerning greenhouse 
gas emissions required by law are set 
out in the Corporate social responsibility 
report on page 60.

Norma Tang
Company Secretary
27th July 2016

Renishaw plc

Registered number 1106260 
England and Wales

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report90

Directors’ responsibilities

The directors are responsible for preparing 
the Annual report and the group and 
parent company financial statements 
in accordance with applicable law 
and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to 
prepare group and parent company 
financial statements for each financial 
year. Under that law they are required to 
prepare the group financial statements in 
accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the 
EU and applicable law and have elected 
to prepare the parent company financial 
statements in accordance with UK 
Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 
Reduced Disclosure Framework.

Under company law the directors must 
not approve the financial statements 
unless they are satisfied that they give a 
true and fair view of the state of affairs 
of the group and parent company and 
of their profit or loss for that period. 
In preparing each of the group and 
parent company financial statements, the 
directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and 

then apply them consistently;

•  make judgements and estimates that 

are reasonable and prudent;

•  for the group financial statements, state 
whether they have been prepared in 
accordance with IFRSs as adopted by 
the EU;

•  for the parent company financial 

statements, state whether applicable 
UK Accounting Standards have been 
followed, subject to any material 
departures disclosed and explained 
in the parent company financial 
statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on 
the going concern basis unless it is 
inappropriate to presume that the group 
and the parent company will continue 
in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping 
adequate accounting records that are 
sufficient to show and explain the parent 
company’s transactions and disclose 
with reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the parent company 
and enable them to ensure that its 
financial statements comply with the 
Companies Act 2006. They have general 
responsibility for taking such steps as are 
reasonably open to them to safeguard the 
assets of the group and to prevent and 
detect fraud and other irregularities.

Under applicable law and regulations, 
the directors are also responsible for 
preparing a strategic report, directors’ 
report, directors’ remuneration report 
and corporate governance statement 
that complies with that law and 
those regulations.

The directors are responsible for the 
maintenance and integrity of the corporate 
and financial information included on 
the company’s website. Legislation in 
the UK governing the preparation and 
dissemination of financial statements may 
differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Responsibility statement of 
the directors in respect of the 
annual financial report
We confirm that to the best of 
our knowledge:

•  the financial statements, prepared in 
accordance with the applicable set 
of accounting standards, give a true 
and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 
financial position and profit or loss of 
the Company and the undertakings 
included in the consolidation taken as a 
whole; and

•  the Strategic report includes a fair 
review of the development and 
performance of the business and 
the position of the Company and 
the undertakings included in the 
consolidation taken as a whole, 
together with a description of the 
principal risks and uncertainties that 
they face.

We consider the Annual report and 
accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, 
balanced and understandable and 
provides the information necessary 
for shareholders to assess the group’s 
position and performance, business 
model and strategy.

Signed on behalf of the Board

Allen Roberts
Group Finance Director
27th July 2016

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201691

Independent auditor’s report to the members of Renishaw plc only

Opinions and conclusions 
arising from our audit
1.Our opinion on the financial 
statements is unmodified

We have audited the financial statements 
of Renishaw plc for the year ended 30th 
June 2016 set out on pages 94 to 133. 
In our opinion: 

•  the financial statements give a true and 
fair view of the state of the Group’s 
and of the parent company’s affairs as 
at 30th June 2016 and of the Group’s 
profit for the year then ended; 

•  the group financial statements have 

been properly prepared in accordance 
with International Financial Reporting 
Standards as adopted by the European 
Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU); 

•  the parent company financial 

statements have been properly 
prepared in accordance with UK 
Accounting Standards, including FRS 
101 Reduced Disclosure Framework; 
and 

•  the financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 and, as regards the group 
financial statements, Article 4 of the 
IAS Regulation. 

2. Our assessment of risks of material 
misstatement

In arriving at our audit opinion above 
on the financial statements the risks 
of material misstatement that had 
the greatest effect on our audit were 
as follows.

(a)  Carrying value of Goodwill £21.3 million 
(2015: £19.7 million) Risk vs 2015: 

Refer to pages 78 and 79 (Audit Committee 
report), page 101 (accounting policy) and 
pages 109 and 110 (financial disclosures).

•  The risk – The Group has engaged in 
a number of business combinations in 
recent years; a number of acquisitions 
are still in the research and development 
phase and have not yet started trading; 
this makes forecasting inherently 
more judgemental.

 Adverse changes in assumptions, 
particularly relating to forecast cash 
flows and discount rates, could reduce 
the recoverable amount below the 
carrying amount, and give rise to an 

impairment charge. The forecasting 
of cash flows and the selection of an 
appropriate discount rate are therefore 
key judgemental areas.

(b)  Carrying value of Work in progress 
(£26.2 million (2015: £20.1 million)) 
and Finished goods (£32.8 million 
(2015: £29.2 million)) Risk vs 2015: 

•  Our response – Our audit procedures 

included evaluating the Group’s 
budgeting procedures upon which 
the forecast cash flows are based 
by performing an assessment of 
the historical accuracy of budgets 
for trading entities by comparing 
previously budgeted figures to actual 
results. We also critically assessed 
the ongoing forecasts for companies 
in the research and development 
phase, by considering the assumptions 
adopted by the directors and taking 
into account the experience of the 
Group at maturing past research and 
development companies into profitable 
trading entities.

 We challenged the Group’s selection of 
the discount rates used by considering 
the assumptions underlying the 
calculation of each discount rate; using 
external data (including competitor 
analysis) to determine an appropriate 
range for each type of business and 
comparing the actual rate used to 
that range. For the period beyond 
the financial budgets and forecasts, 
we assessed whether the growth 
rate used was consistent with both 
historical performance and future 
business strategies. 

 Where the forecasts utilised were 
inconsistent with historical performance, 
we challenged these assumptions with 
the key decision makers within divisional 
management to assess whether these 
forecasts were, in our view, achievable 
with reference to the historical accuracy 
of budgeting.

 We evaluated the Group’s sensitivity 
analysis, by performing our own 
analysis to assess the sensitivity of the 
impairment reviews to changes in the 
key assumptions of the discount rate, 
the forecast cash flows and growth rate 
beyond the financial budgets.

 We assessed the adequacy of the 
Group’s disclosures in respect of 
the impairment testing of goodwill 
and whether disclosures about the 
sensitivity of the outcome of the 
impairment assessment to changes in 
key assumptions properly reflected the 
risks inherent in it.

Refer to pages 78 and 79 (Audit Committee 
report), page 101 (accounting policy) and 
page 114 (financial disclosures).

•  The risk – The Group trades globally 

and holds significant levels of inventory 
in the key manufacturing centres in 
the UK, Ireland and India and sales 
offices around the world. There is an 
ongoing risk of product obsolescence 
on Finished goods and Work in 
progress due to the fast-paced nature 
of the industry.

 The Group maintains an inventory 
provision for potential product 
obsolescence to the extent that the 
cost of inventory is not deemed to 
be recoverable through future sales. 
The inventory provision is calculated 
at a disaggregated level. For each 
individual stock item, a provision is 
initially calculated based on historic 
and budgeted sales and standard 
selling prices. The results of these initial 
calculations are then assessed by group 
management and adjusted as deemed 
necessary, based on management’s 
expectation of future demand and 
selling prices. The assumptions 
underlying the provision calculations are 
judgemental and changes could have a 
material impact on the carrying value of 
Work in progress and Finished goods.

•  Our response – In this area our audit 
procedures included challenging the 
Group’s key assumptions, being the 
future demand and selling pricing, in 
respect of the provision calculation. 
We assessed the historical accuracy of 
the inventory provision and, based on 
our own knowledge of the industry, we 
challenged material adjustments made by 
group management to the initial provision 
calculations. We also identified slow 
moving line items, considering whether 
appropriate levels of provision were held 
against these items by comparison to the 
most recent sales invoices. In addition, 
for a sample of inventory items we 
compared the carrying amount to recent 
sales invoices to assess whether these 
items have been written down to net 
realisable value. 

 We assessed the adequacy of the 
Group’s disclosures in this area.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
92

Independent auditor’s report to the members of Renishaw plc only (continued)

3. Our application of materiality and 
an overview of the scope of our audit

The materiality for the financial statements 
as a whole was set at £4.0 million 
(2015: £7.0 million), determined with 
reference to a benchmark of group profit 
before taxation (of which it represents 
5.0% (2015: 4.9%).

We report to the Audit Committee 
any corrected or uncorrected 
identified misstatements exceeding 
£0.2 million, in addition to other identified 
misstatements that warranted reporting 
on qualitative grounds.

Of the Group’s 48 (2015: 42) reporting 
components, we subjected 7 (2015: 7) to 
audits for group reporting purposes.

The components within the scope of 
our work accounted for the following 
percentages of the Group’s results:

The components for which we performed 
work other than audits for group reporting 
purposes were not individually significant 
but were included in the scope of our 
group reporting work in order to provide 
further coverage over the Group’s results.

For the remaining components, we 
performed analysis at an aggregated 
group level to re-examine our assessment 
that there were no significant risks of 
material misstatement within these.

The Group audit team instructed 
component auditors as to the significant 
areas to be covered, including the relevant 
risks detailed above and the information to 
be reported back.

The Group audit team approved 
component materiality, which was set at 
£2.0 million, having regard to the mix of 
size and risk profile of the Group across 
the components. 

The work on five of the audits for group 
reporting purposes was performed by 
component auditors and the rest by the 
Group audit team.

Telephone conference meetings were held 
with the component auditors to assess 
the audit risk, strategy and audit findings. 
During these meetings, the findings 
reported to the Group audit team were 
discussed in more detail.

4. Our opinion on other matters 
prescribed by the Companies Act 
2006 is unmodified

In our opinion: 

•  the part of the Directors’ remuneration 
report to be audited has been properly 
prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006; and 

•  the information given in the Strategic 

report and the Directors’ report for the 
financial year for which the financial 
statements are prepared is consistent 
with the financial statements.

Audits for group reporting purposes
Reviews of financial information  
(including enquiry)
Coverage

Number of 
components
7

Revenue  
(%)
83%

Profit before
tax (%)
90%

Total assets
(%)
78%

13
20

15%
98%

10%
100%

11%
89%

GovernanceRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201693

Scope of report and 
responsibilities
As explained more fully in the Directors’ 
responsibilities statement set out on page 
90, the directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements 
and for being satisfied that they give a 
true and fair view. A description of the 
scope of an audit of financial statements 
is provided on the Financial Reporting 
Council’s website at www.frc.org.uk/
auditscopeukprivate. This report is made 
solely to the Company’s members as 
a body and is subject to important 
explanations and disclaimers regarding 
our responsibilities, published on 
our website at www.kpmg.com/uk/
auditscopeukco2014a, which are 
incorporated into this report as if set out 
in full and should be read to provide an 
understanding of the purpose of this 
report, the work we have undertaken and 
the basis of our opinions.

Virginia Stevens
(Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, 
Statutory Auditor 

Chartered Accountants 
100 Temple Street 
Bristol 
BS1 6AG

27th July 2016

5. We have nothing to report on the 
disclosures of principal risks

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are 
required to report to you if, in our opinion: 

•  adequate accounting records have not 
been kept by the parent company, or 
returns adequate for our audit have not 
been received from branches not visited 
by us; or 

•  the parent company financial 

statements and the part of the 
Directors’ remuneration report to be 
audited are not in agreement with the 
accounting records and returns; or 

•  certain disclosures of directors’ 

remuneration specified by law are not 
made; or 

•  we have not received all the information 

and explanations we require for 
our audit.

Under the Listing Rules we are required 
to review: 

•  the directors’ statements, set out on 
pages 73 and 74, in relation to going 
concern and longer-term viability; and

•  the part of the corporate governance 
statement on page 75 relating to the 
Company’s compliance with the eleven 
provisions of the 2014 UK Corporate 
Governance Code specified for 
our review.

We have nothing to report in respect of 
the above responsibilities.

Based on the knowledge we acquired 
during our audit, we have nothing material 
to add or draw attention to in relation to: 

•  the directors’ statement of principal 

risks and uncertainties on pages 50 and 
51, concerning the principal risks, their 
management, and, based on that, the 
directors’ assessment and expectations 
of the Group’s continuing in operation 
over the three years to 30th June 2019; 
or 

•  the disclosures in note 1 of the financial 
statements concerning the use of the 
going concern basis of accounting. 

6. We have nothing to report in 
respect of the matters on which we 
are required to report by exception 

Under ISAs (UK and Ireland) we are 
required to report to you if, based on 
the knowledge we acquired during our 
audit, we have identified other information 
in the annual report that contains a 
material inconsistency with either that 
knowledge or the financial statements, a 
material misstatement of fact, or that is 
otherwise misleading. 

In particular, we are required to report to 
you if: 

•  we have identified material 

inconsistencies between the knowledge 
we acquired during our audit and the 
directors’ statement that they consider 
that the annual report and financial 
statements taken as a whole is fair, 
balanced and understandable and 
provides the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Group’s 
performance, business model and 
strategy; or

•  the Audit Committee report does 
not appropriately address matters 
communicated by us to the 
Audit Committee.

GovernanceFinancial statementsShareholder informationStrategic report94

Consolidated income statement

for the year ended 30th June 2016

from continuing operations 

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Distribution costs
Administrative expenses

Operating profit

Financial income
Financial expenses
Share of profits of associates

Profit before tax

Income tax expense

Profit for the year from continuing operations

Profit attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the parent company
Non-controlling interest

Profit for the year from continuing operations

Dividend per share arising in respect of the year
Dividend per share paid in the year
Earnings per share (basic and diluted) 

notes

2

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

436,598

494,720

(218,308)

(221,089)

218,290

273,631

(97,808)
(40,969)

(87,879)
(41,828)

79,513

143,924

872
(1,800)
1,451

884
(1,492)
880

80,036

144,196

(11,465)

(22,850)

68,571

121,346

69,095
(524)
68,571

121,908
(562)
121,346

pence
48.0
46.5
94.9

pence
46.5
42.4
167.5

4
4
10

5

6

19

19

7

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201695

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense

for the year ended 30th June 2016

Profit for the year

Other items recognised directly in equity:

Items that will not be reclassified to the Consolidated income statement:
Remeasurement of defined benefit liabilities
Deferred tax on remeasurement of defined benefit scheme liabilities
Total for items that will not be reclassified

Items that may be reclassified to the Consolidated income statement:
Foreign exchange translation differences
Comprehensive income and expense of associates
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of recycling
Deferred tax on effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
Total for items that may be reclassified

Total other comprehensive income and expense, net of tax

Total comprehensive income and expense for the year

Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the parent company
Non-controlling interest
Total comprehensive income and expense for the year

notes

2016
£’000
68,571

2015
£’000
121,346

13

19
19

19

(20,868)
3,480
(17,388)

8,409
753
(91,168)
17,537
(64,469)

(6,032)
1,580
(4,452)

111
–
(10,511)
2,102
(8,298)

(81,857)

(12,750)

(13,286)

108,596

(12,762)
(524)
(13,286)

109,158
(562)
108,596

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements96

Consolidated balance sheet

at 30th June 2016

Assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in associates
Deferred tax assets
Derivatives
Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Current tax
Other receivables
Derivatives
Pension scheme cash escrow account
Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets

Current liabilities
Trade payables
Overdraft
Current tax
Provisions
Derivatives
Other payables
Total current liabilities

Net current assets

Non-current liabilities
Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivatives
Other payables
Total non-current liabilities

Total assets less total liabilities

Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Currency translation reserve
Cash flow hedging reserve
Retained earnings
Other reserve
Equity attributable to the shareholders of the parent company
Non-controlling interest
Total equity

notes

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

8
9
10
11
12

14
20

12
13
15, 20

15, 20

16
12
17

13
11
12
18

19

19
19

213,917
61,255
5,658
40,996
76
321,902

94,959
114,945
1,166
18,090
859
15,279
31,278
276,576

22,379
9,975
3,558
2,375
19,987
18,345
76,619

169,592
57,664
3,480
19,536
10,504
260,776

77,673
101,213
1,064
12,809
14,889
14,731
82,171
304,550

21,154
–
10,775
1,715
764
28,561
62,969

199,957

241,581

67,823
21,999
50,652
–
140,474

48,094
21,991
3,165
589
73,839

381,385

428,518

14,558
42
6,448
(56,460)
420,419
(460)
384,547
(3,162)
381,385

14,558
42
(2,714)
17,171
402,559
(460)
431,156
(2,638)
428,518

These financial statements were approved by the Board of directors on 27th July 2016 and were signed on its behalf by:

Sir David R McMurtry 
Directors

A C G Roberts

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201697

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

for the year ended 30th June 2016

Year ended 30th June 2015
Balance at 1st July 2014

Profit/(loss) for the year

Other comprehensive income 
and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit 
pension liabilities 
Foreign exchange translation differences
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
Total other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income

Share 
capital
£’000
14,558

Share
premium
£’000
42

Currency
translation
reserve 
£’000
(2,825)

Cash flow 
hedging
reserve
£’000
25,580

Retained
earnings
£’000
315,944

Other
reserve
£’000
(460)

Non-
controlling
interest
£’000

Total
£’000
(2,076) 350,763

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

121,908

–
111
–
111

–
–
(8,409)
(8,409)

(4,452)
–
–
(4,452)

111

(8,409) 117,456

–

–
–
–
–

–

(562) 121,346

–
–
–
–

(4,452)
111
(8,409)
(12,750)

(562) 108,596

Dividends paid
Balance at 30th June 2015

–
14,558

–
42

–
(2,714)

–
17,171

(30,841)
402,559

–
(460)

–

(30,841)
(2,638) 428,518

Year ended 30th June 2016

Profit/(loss) for the year

Other comprehensive income 
and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit 
pension liabilities
Foreign exchange translation differences
Relating to associates
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
Total other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income

–

–
–
–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–
–
–

–

–

–

69,095

–
8,409
753
–
9,162

–
–
–
(73,631)
(73,631)

(17,388)
–
–
–
(17,388)

9,162

(73,631)

51,707

–

–
–
–
–

–

(524)

68,571

–
–
–
–
–

(17,388)
8,409
753
(73,631)
(81,857)

(524)

(13,286)

Dividends paid
Balance at 30th June 2016

–
14,558

–
42

–
6,448

–

(33,847)
(56,460) 420,419

–
(460)

–

(33,847)
(3,162) 381,385

More details of share capital and reserves are given in note 19.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements98

Consolidated statement of cash flow

for the year ended 30th June 2016

Cash flows from operating activities
Profit for the year

Adjustments for:
Amortisation of development costs
Amortisation of other intangibles
Depreciation
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment
Share of profits from associates
Financial income
Financial expenses
Tax expense

Increase in inventories
Increase in trade and other receivables
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables
Increase in provisions

Defined benefit pension contributions
Income taxes paid
Cash flows from operating activities

Investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Development costs capitalised
Purchase of other intangibles
Investment in subsidiaries and associates
Sale of property, plant and equipment
Interest received
Dividends received from associates
Payments to pension scheme escrow account (net)
Cash flows from investing activities

Financing activities
Interest paid
Dividends paid
Cash flows from financing activities

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

notes

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

68,571

121,346

9
9
8

10
4
4
6

16

9

4
10

4
19

15

9,116
2,313
18,258
166
(1,451)
(872)
1,800
11,465
40,795

(17,286)
(2,951)
(12,439)
660
(32,016)

(2,708)
(19,463)
55,179

(52,996)
(12,246)
(1,294)
(284)
826
872
310
(548)
(65,360)

(231)
(33,847)
(34,078)

(44,259)
82,171
(16,609)
21,303

10,141
2,990
14,925
(99)
(880)
(884)
1,492
22,850
50,535

(14,694)
(21,712)
15,204
421
(20,781)

(2,427)
(16,410)
132,263

(48,387)
(12,975)
(1,207)
(480)
2,408
884
110
(5,190)
(64,837)

(43)
(30,841)
(30,884)

36,542
43,634
1,995
82,171

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201699

Notes (forming part of the financial statements)

1. Accounting policies
Basis of preparation

Renishaw plc (the Company) is a company incorporated in the UK. 

The group financial statements consolidate those of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the Group) and equity 
account the Group’s interest in associates. The parent company financial statements present information about the Company as a 
separate entity and not about the Group. 

The group financial statements have been prepared and approved by the directors in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU (adopted IFRS). The parent company financial statements have been prepared in 
accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”.

The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied consistently to all periods presented in these group 
financial statements. Judgements made by the directors, in the application of these accounting policies, that have a significant effect 
on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year are noted below.

Basis of accounting

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, subject to items referred to in the derivative 
financial instruments note below. The accounting policies set out below have been consistently applied in preparing both the 2015 
and 2016 financial statements.

Critical accounting judgements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with adopted IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and 
assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates 
and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under 
the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are 
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions 
are reviewed on an ongoing basis.

The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and 
liabilities in the next financial year are listed below:

(i) Inventory

Determining the value of inventory requires judgement, especially in respect of provisioning for slow moving and potentially 
obsolete inventory. Management consider historic and future forecast sales patterns of individual stock items when calculating 
inventory provisions. 

(ii) Impairment of goodwill

Determining whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation of the value in use of cash-generating units (CGUs) to which goodwill 
has been allocated. The value in use calculation involves an estimation of the future cash flows of CGUs and also the selection of 
appropriate discount rates, which involves judgement, to calculate present values (see note 9).

Other estimates and judgements that have been made in these financial statements are as follows:

(i) Defined benefit pension scheme liabilities

Determining the value of the future defined benefit obligation requires judgement in respect of the assumptions used to calculate 
present values. These include future mortality, discount rate, inflation and salary increases. Management makes these judgements in 
consultation with an independent actuary. Details of the estimates and judgements in respect of the current year are given in note 13.

(ii) Amortisation of intangibles and impairment

The periods of amortisation of intangible assets require judgements to be made on the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets 
to determine an appropriate rate of amortisation. Future assessments of impairment may lead to the writing off of certain amounts 
of intangible assets and the consequent charge in the Consolidated income statement for the accelerated amortisation.

(iii) Capitalisation of development costs

Product development costs are capitalised once a project has reached a certain stage of development and these costs are 
subsequently amortised over a five-year period. Judgements are required to assess whether the new product development has 
reached the appropriate point for capitalisation of costs to begin. Should a product be subsequently obsoleted, the accumulated 
capitalised development costs would need to be immediately written off in the Consolidated income statement.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements100

Notes (continued)

1. Accounting policies (continued) 
Revenue

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised in the Consolidated income statement when the significant risks and rewards 
of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, which is normally the time of despatch. Where certain products require installation, 
part of the revenue may be deferred until the installation is complete. No revenue is recognised if there are significant uncertainties 
regarding recovery of the consideration due, or the possible return of goods.

Revenue from the sale of services is recognised over the period to which the service relates. Where goods and services are sold as 
a bundle, the fair value of services is deferred and recognised over the period to which the service relates with the remaining revenue 
recognised on despatch.

New, revised or changes to existing accounting standards

The following accounting standards have been issued but are not yet effective and have not been applied by the Group:

IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers – This is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st January 2018. 
The new standard requires the separation of performance obligations within contracts with customers and the contractual value 
to be allocated to each of the performance obligations. Revenue is then recognised as each performance obligation is satisfied. 
The introduction of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the results of the Group due to the relatively 
straightforward contractual terms and conditions with customers.

IFRS 9 Financial instruments – This is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st January 2018. The introduction of this 
standard is not expected to have a material impact on the net assets or results of the Group, but may result in additional disclosures.

IFRS 16 Leases – This has a mandatory effective date of 1st January 2019. The new standard will eliminate the classification of 
leases as either operating or finance leases and result in operating leases being treated as finance leases. This will result in previously 
recognised operating leases being treated as property, plant and equipment along with a finance leases creditor. The introduction 
of this standard will increase the value of property, plant and equipment and the finance lease liability on the balance sheet but it is 
unlikely to have a material effect on the profit in any year. 

Basis of consolidation

Subsidiaries – Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed or has rights to 
variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. 
In assessing control, the Group takes into consideration potential voting rights that are exercisable. The acquisition date is the date 
on which control is transferred to the acquirer. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial 
statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Losses applicable to the non-controlling 
interests in a subsidiary are allocated to the non-controlling interests even if doing so causes the non-controlling interests to have a 
deficit balance.

Associates – Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and 
operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when the Group holds between 20% and 50% of the voting power of 
another entity.

Application of the equity method to associates – Associates are accounted for using the equity method (equity accounted investees) 
and are initially recognised at cost. The Group’s investment includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated 
impairment losses. The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the total comprehensive income and equity 
movements of equity accounted investees, from the date that significant influence commences until the date that significant influence 
ceases. When the Group’s share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity accounted investee, the Group’s carrying amount is 
reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has incurred legal obligations or 
made payments on behalf of an investee.

Transactions eliminated on consolidation – Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses 
arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with equity accounted investees are 
eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same 
way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016101

1. Accounting policies (continued) 
Foreign currencies

Foreign subsidiaries’ results are translated into Sterling at weighted average exchange rates for the year, which is effected by 
translating each foreign subsidiary’s monthly results at exchange rates applicable to each of the respective months. Assets and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into Sterling at the foreign exchange rates 
ruling at that date. Differences on exchange resulting from the translation of overseas assets and liabilities are recognised directly 
in equity. Gains and losses arising on currency borrowings used to hedge the foreign currency exposure on the net assets of the 
foreign operations are accounted for directly in equity, to the extent that hedge accounting criteria are met and are included in the 
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense. See the note on derivative financial instruments below, for the 
accounting policies for forward exchange contracts and currency borrowings.

Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments are recognised at fair value. The gain or loss on remeasurement to fair value is recognised immediately 
in the Consolidated income statement. However, where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resultant gain or 
loss depends on the nature of the item being hedged (see below).

Hedge of net investment in foreign operation

The portion of the gain or loss on an instrument used to hedge a net investment in a foreign operation that is determined to be 
an effective hedge is recognised directly in equity. Any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the Consolidated income 
statement. The effectiveness of the hedging is tested monthly.

Inventory and work in progress

Inventory and work in progress is valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. In respect of work in progress and finished 
goods, cost includes all production overheads and the attributable proportion of indirect overhead expenses which are required to 
bring inventories to their present location and condition. Overheads are absorbed into inventories on the basis of normal capacity or 
on actual hours if higher.

Pension scheme cash escrow account

The Company holds a pension scheme escrow account as part of the security given for the UK defined benefit pension scheme. 
This account is shown within current assets in the Consolidated balance sheet as it may be used to settle pension scheme liabilities 
immediately upon enforcement of the charge over the account.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

Costs related to the acquisition, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, are expensed as incurred. 
Deferred consideration relating to acquisitions is subject to discounting to the date of acquisition and subsequently unwound to the 
date of the final payment. Goodwill arising on acquisition represents the difference between the cost of the acquisition and the fair 
value of the net identifiable assets acquired, net of deferred tax. Identifiable intangibles are those which can be sold separately or 
which arise from legal rights regardless of whether those rights are separable.

Where there exists an option to purchase the non-controlling interest of a subsidiary and the option is deemed to have been 
exercised, the Group has adopted the anticipated-acquisition method. Any changes to the carrying amount of the liability are 
recognised in the Consolidated income statement.

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method as at the acquisition date, which is the date on which control 
is transferred to the Group.

Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. It is not amortised but is tested annually for impairment or earlier 
if there are any indications of impairment. The annual impairment review involves comparing the carrying amount to the estimated 
recoverable amount and recognising an impairment loss if the recoverable amount is lower. Impairment losses are recognised through 
the Consolidated income statement.

Intangible assets such as customer lists, patents, trade marks, know-how and intellectual property that are acquired by the Group are 
stated at cost less amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged to the Consolidated income statement on a straight-
line basis over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets included in the 
Consolidated balance sheet reflect the benefit derived by the Group and vary from five to ten years.

On a transaction by transaction basis, the Group elects to measure non-controlling interests, which have both present ownership 
interests and are entitled to a proportionate share of net assets of the acquiree in the event of liquidation, either at its fair value or at its 
proportionate interest in the recognised amount of the identifiable net assets of the acquiree at the acquisition date. All other non-
controlling interests are measured at their fair value at the acquisition date. Where there are changes to the Company’s interests in 
subsidiaries while retaining control, any differences between the amount by which non-controlling interests are adjusted and fair value 
of consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity in the “other reserve”.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements102

Notes (continued)

1. Accounting policies (continued) 
Intangible assets – research and development costs

Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the Consolidated income statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on 
development activities is capitalised if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Group intends and has 
the technical ability and sufficient resources to complete development, future economic benefits are probable and the Group can 
measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.

Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products or processes. The  
expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. Other development 
expenditure is recognised in the Consolidated income statement as an expense as incurred.

Capitalised development expenditure is amortised over five years and is stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and less 
accumulated impairment losses. Capitalised development expenditure is removed from the balance sheet ten years after being 
fully amortised. 

Intangible assets – software licences

Intangible assets, comprising software licences that are acquired by the Group, are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and 
impairment losses. Amortisation is charged on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The useful life of each 
of these assets is assessed on an individual basis and they range from two to 10 years. 

Property, plant and equipment

Freehold land is not depreciated. Other assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided to write off 
the cost of assets less their estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives as follows:

Freehold buildings   
Plant and equipment 
Vehicles   

Warranty provisions

50 years 
3 to 25 years 
3 to 4 years

The Group provides a warranty from the date of purchase, except for those products that we install where the warranty starts from 
the date of completion of the installation. This is typically for a 12-month period, although up to three years is given for a small number 
of products. A warranty provision is included in the financial statements, which is calculated on the basis of historical returns and 
internal quality reports.

Employee benefits

The Group operates contributory pension schemes, largely for UK, Ireland and USA employees, which were of the defined benefit 
type up to 5th April 2007, 31st December 2007 and 30th June 2012 respectively, at which time they ceased any future accrual for 
existing members and were closed to new members. 

The schemes are administered by trustees who are independent of the group finances. Pension scheme assets of the defined benefit 
schemes are measured using market value. Pension scheme liabilities are measured using a projected unit method and discounted 
at the current rate of return on a high-quality corporate bond of equivalent term and currency to the liability. Remeasurements arising 
from defined benefit schemes comprise actuarial gains and losses, the return on scheme assets (excluding interest) and the effect of 
the asset ceiling (if any, excluding interest). The Company recognises them immediately in other comprehensive income and all other 
expenses related to defined benefit schemes are included in the Consolidated income statement.

The pension schemes’ surpluses, to the extent that they are considered recoverable, or deficits are recognised in full and presented 
on the face of the Consolidated balance sheet under employee benefits. Where a guarantee is in place in relation to a pension 
scheme deficit, liabilities are reported in accordance with IFRIC 14. Foreign-based employees are covered by state, defined benefit 
and private pension schemes in their countries of residence. Actuarial valuations of foreign pension schemes were not obtained, apart 
from Ireland and USA, because of the limited number of foreign employees. For defined contribution schemes, the amount charged to 
the Consolidated income statement represents the contributions payable to the schemes in respect of the accounting period.

Accruals are made for holiday pay, based on a calculation of the number of days holiday earned during the year, but not yet taken.

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
103

1. Accounting policies (continued) 
Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and short-term (with an original maturity of less than three months) deposits. 
Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand form part of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the Consolidated statement 
of cash flow.

Exceptional items

Exceptional items are items which due to their size, incidence and non-recurring nature have been classified separately in order to 
draw them to the attention of the reader of the accounts and, in management’s judgement, to show more accurately the underlying 
results of the Group. Such items are included within the Consolidated income statement caption to which they relate and are 
disclosed separately on the face of the Consolidated income statement.

Going concern

The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, are set 
out in the Strategic report, where also given are details of the financial and liquidity positions. In addition, note 20 in the financial 
statements includes the Group’s objectives and policies for managing its capital, details of its financial instruments and hedging 
activities and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group has considerable financial resources at its disposal and the 
directors have considered the current financial projections. As a consequence, the directors believe that the Group is well placed to 
manage its business risks successfully.

After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to 
continue in operational existence for the next 12 months. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the 
Annual report and accounts.

Cash flow hedges

Forward exchange contracts are recognised at fair value. Where a forward contract is designated as a hedge of the variability in future 
cash inflows, the effective part of any gain or loss on the forward contract is recognised directly in equity. Any effective cumulative gain 
or loss is removed from equity and recognised in the Consolidated income statement at the same time as the hedged transaction. 
The ineffective part of any gain or loss is recognised in the Consolidated income statement immediately. If the hedged transaction 
is no longer expected to take place, the cumulative unrealised gain or loss held in equity is recognised in the Consolidated income 
statement immediately. The effectiveness of cash flow hedges is tested on a monthly basis by comparing the cash inflows with the 
hedging amounts.

Taxation

Tax on the profit for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the Consolidated income statement except 
to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in the Consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income and expense. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates 
enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in previous years.

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting 
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for: the initial recognition 
of goodwill, the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit other than in a business 
combination and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable 
future. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of 
assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognised 
only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements104

Notes (continued)

2. Segmental analysis
Renishaw manages its operations in two segments, comprising metrology and healthcare products. The results of these segments 
are regularly reviewed by the Board to allocate resources to segments and to assess their performance. The Group evaluates 
performance of the segments on the basis of revenue and profits. Within metrology, there are multiple operating segments that are 
aggregated into a reporting segment for reportable purposes, where they have similar economic characteristics, and where the nature 
of the products and production processes and their customer base are similar. The revenue, depreciation and amortisation, and 
operating profit for each reportable segment were:

Year ended 30th June 2016
Revenue
Depreciation and amortisation

Operating profit/(loss)
Share of profits from associates
Net financial expense
Profit before tax

Year ended 30th June 2015 
Revenue
Depreciation and amortisation

Operating profit/(loss)
Share of profits from associates
Net financial expense
Profit before tax

Metrology
£’000
408,184
26,334

85,895
1,451
–
–

Metrology
£’000
467,001
24,055

150,770
880
–
–

Healthcare
£’000
28,414
3,353

(6,382)
–
–
–

Healthcare
£’000
27,719
4,001

(6,846)
–
–
–

There is no allocation of assets and liabilities to operating segments. Depreciation is included within certain other overhead 
expenditure which is allocated to segments on the basis of the level of activity.

The analysis of revenue by geographical market was:

Far East, including Australasia
Continental Europe
North, South and Central America
UK and Ireland
Other regions
Total group revenue

2016
£’000
195,343
112,075
92,198
23,208
13,774
436,598

Total
£’000
436,598
29,687

79,513
1,451
(928)
80,036

Total
£’000
494,720
28,056

143,924
880
(608)
144,196

2015
£’000
257,665
103,106
96,284
25,499
12,166
494,720

Revenue in the previous table has been allocated to regions based on the geographical location of the customer. Countries with 
individually material revenue figures in the context of the Group were:

China
USA
Japan
Germany
South Korea

2016
£’000
107,628
79,984
49,328
48,509
13,245

2015
£’000
119,551
82,350
43,946
44,658
73,113

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016105

2. Segmental analysis (continued) 
For the current financial year, there was no revenue from transactions with a single external customer which amounted to more than 
10% of the Group’s total revenue. In the previous financial year there was revenue from transactions with one external customer which 
amounted to more than 10% of the Group’s total revenue. This was in the metrology segment and amounted to £62,607,000.

The following table shows the analysis of non-current assets by geographical region:

United Kingdom
Overseas
Total non-current assets

2016
£’000
190,396
90,434
280,830

2015
£’000
166,468
64,268
230,736

No overseas country had non-current assets amounting to 10% or more of the Group’s total non-current assets.

3. Personnel expenses
The aggregate payroll costs for the year were:

Wages and salaries
Compulsory social security contributions
Contributions to defined contribution schemes
Total payroll costs

The average number of persons employed by the Group during the year was:

UK
Overseas
Average number of employees

The total remuneration of the directors was:

Salary and fees
Bonus
Benefits
Pension contributions
Total remuneration of the directors

Full details of directors’ remuneration are given in the Directors’ remuneration report.

4. Financial income and expenses

Financial income
Interest receivable

Financial expenses
Net interest on pension schemes’ liabilities (note 13)
Bank interest payable
Unwinding of discount on deferred consideration
Total financial expenses

2016
£’000
148,852
16,856
18,061
183,769

2016
Number
2,755
1,437
4,192

2016
£’000
2,461
–
81
184
2,726

2016
£’000
872

2016
£’000
1,569
231
–
1,800

2015
£’000
141,392
16,005
16,347
173,744

2015
Number
2,529
1,282
3,811

2015
£’000
2,376
2,225
79
178
4,858

2015
£’000
884

2015
£’000
1,421
43
28
1,492

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements106

Notes (continued)

5. Profit before tax
Included in the profit before tax are the following costs/(income):

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Amortisation of intangibles
Research and development expenditure
Loss/(profit) on sale of property, plant and equipment
Foreign currency (gains)/losses
Auditor:
  Audit of these financial statements
  Audit of subsidiary undertakings pursuant to legislation
  Audit assurance
  Tax compliance 
  Tax advisory
  Audit of pension schemes
  Other services in relation to pension schemes 
  All other non-audit fees 

notes
(a)
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
(c)

(c)
 (c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)
(c)

2016
£’000
18,258
11,429
46,026
166
(642)

169
195
13
30
103
20
264
46

2015
£’000
14,925
13,131
42,260
(99)
339

121
181
22
88
167
20
125
48

These costs/(income) can be found under the following headings in the Consolidated income statement: (a) within cost of sales, 
distribution costs and administrative expenses; (b) within cost of sales; and (c) within administrative expenses.

6. Income tax expense

Current tax:
UK corporation tax on profits for the year
UK corporation tax – prior year adjustments
Overseas tax on profits for the year
Total current tax

Deferred tax:
Origination and reversal of other temporary differences
Effect on deferred tax for change in UK tax rate to 19% (2015: 20%) 

Tax charge on profit

2016
£’000

3,389
860
7,651
11,900

494
(929)
(435)
11,465

2015
£’000

11,526
327
12,131
23,984

(1,134)
–
(1,134)
22,850

Effective tax rate (based on profit before tax)

14.3%

15.8%

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
107

6. Income tax expense (continued) 
The tax for the year is lower (2015: lower) than the weighted average of the UK standard rate of corporation tax of 20% (2015: 20.75%).

The differences are explained as follows:

Profit before tax

Tax at 20% (2015: 20.75%)
Effects of:
Different tax rates applicable in overseas subsidiaries
Research and development tax credit and patent box
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
Companies with unrelieved tax losses
Items with no tax effect
Prior year adjustments
Effect on deferred tax for change in UK tax rate to 19%
Other differences
Tax charge on profit

2016
£’000
80,036

2015
£’000
144,196

16,007

29,921

(2,594)
(2,359)
266
461
(290)
860
(929)
43
11,465

(2,723)
(5,745)
324
749
(183)
327
–
180
22,850

On 26th October 2015, the reduction in the UK rate of corporation tax to 19% from 1st April 2017 and 18% from 1st April 2020 was 
substantively enacted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been calculated based on the rate of 19%.

7. Earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated on earnings after tax of £69,095,000 (2015: £121,908,000) and on 72,788,543 
shares, being the number of shares in issue during both years. There is no difference between the weighted average earnings per 
share and the basic and diluted earnings per share.

8. Property, plant and equipment 

Year ended 30th June 2016
Cost
At 1st July 2015
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2016

Depreciation
At 1st July 2015
Charge for the year
Released on disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2016

Net book value
At 30th June 2016
At 30th June 2015

Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000

127,097
4,462
2,141
(1,020)
9,985
142,665

Plant and
equipment
£’000

145,642
23,865
14,042
(2,162)
5,661
187,048

22,608
2,915
(621)
2,339
27,241

91,393
14,283
(1,831)
3,200
107,045

Motor
vehicles
£’000

Assets in the
course of 
construction
£’000

8,575
1,475
–
(1,190)
740
9,600

5,596
1,060
(1,129)
469
5,996

7,875
23,194
(16,183)
–
–
14,886

–
–
–
–
–

Total
£’000

289,189
52,996
–
(4,372)
16,386
354,199

119,597
18,258
(3,581)
6,008
140,282

115,424
104,489

80,003
54,249

3,604
2,979

14,886
7,875

213,917
169,592

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements108

Notes (continued)

8. Property, plant and equipment (continued)
At 30th June 2016, properties with a net book value of £66,485,000 (2015: £45,033,000) were subject to a fixed charge to secure 
the UK defined benefit pension scheme liabilities. 

Additions to assets in the course of construction of £23,194,000 (2015: £27,286,000) comprise £12,938,000 (2015: £13,556,000) 
for freehold land and buildings and £10,256,000 (2015: £13,730,000) for plant and equipment.

Year ended 30th June 2015
Cost
At 1st July 2014
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2015

Depreciation
At 1st July 2014
Charge for the year
Released on disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2015

Net book value
At 30th June 2015
At 30th June 2014

9. Intangible assets

Year ended 30th June 2016
Cost
At 1st July 2015
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2016

Amortisation
At 1st July 2015
Charge for the year
Released on disposal
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2016

Net book value
At 30th June 2016
At 30th June 2015

Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000

98,056
7,329
25,495
(1,381)
(2,402)
127,097

21,114
2,292
(303)
(495)
22,608

Plant and
equipment
£’000

131,134
12,222
7,846
(4,120)
(1,440)
145,642

83,952
11,444
(2,985)
(1,018)
91,393

Motor
vehicles
£’000

8,049
1,550
–
(695)
(329)
8,575

5,181
1,189
(599)
(175)
5,596

Assets in the
course of 
construction
£’000

13,930
27,286
(33,341)
–
–
7,875

–
–
–
–
–

Total
£’000

251,169
48,387
–
(6,196)
(4,171)
289,189

110,247
14,925
(3,887)
(1,688)
119,597

104,489
76,942

54,249
47,182

2,979
2,868

7,875
13,930

169,592
140,922

Goodwill on 
consolidation
£’000

Other
 intangible 
assets
£’000

Internally
generated
development 
costs
£’000

Software licences

In use
£’000

In the course 
of acquisition
£’000

19,736
–
–
–
1,532
21,268

–
–
–
–
–

10,655
44
–
–
550
11,249

9,914
617
–
408
10,939

89,475
12,246
–
(258)
–
101,463

58,824
9,116
(258)
–
67,682

21,490
1,201
74
(249)
71
22,587

14,979
1,696
(48)
64
16,691

25
49
(74)
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

Total
£’000

141,381
13,540
–
(507)
2,153
156,567

83,717
11,429
(306)
472
95,312

21,268
19,736

310
741

33,781
30,651

5,896
6,511

–
25

61,255
57,664

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016109

9. Intangible assets (continued)

Year ended 30th June 2015
Cost
At 1st July 2014
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2015

Amortisation
At 1st July 2014
Charge for the year
Released on disposal
Currency adjustment
At 30th June 2015

Net book value
At 30th June 2015
At 30th June 2014

Goodwill on 
consolidation
£’000

Other
 intangible 
assets
£’000

Internally
generated
development 
costs
£’000

Software licences

In use
£’000

In the course 
of acquisition
£’000

19,873
–
–
(198)
61
19,736

198
–
(198)
–
–

10,644
36
–
–
(25)
10,655

8,631
1,293
–
(10)
9,914

78,188
12,975
–
(1,688)
–
89,475

50,371
10,141
(1,688)
–
58,824

20,509
994
188
(189)
(12)
21,490

13,479
1,697
(189)
(8)
14,979

36
177
(188)
–
–
25

–
–
–
–
–

Total
£’000

129,250
14,182
–
(2,075)
24
141,381

72,679
13,131
(2,075)
(18)
83,717

19,736
19,675

741
2,013

30,651
27,817

6,511
7,030

25
36

57,664
56,571

Goodwill acquired has arisen on the acquisition of a number of businesses and has an indeterminable useful life. Therefore it is not 
amortised but is tested for impairment annually and at any point during the year when an indicator of impairment exists. Goodwill is 
allocated to the CGUs, which are mainly the statutory entities acquired. This is the lowest level in the Group at which goodwill is 
monitored for impairment and is at a lower level than the Group’s operating segments. In the table below, only the goodwill relating 
to the acquisition of R&R Fixtures, LLC is expected to be subject to tax relief.

The analysis of acquired goodwill on consolidation is:

itp GmbH
Renishaw Diagnostics Limited (92.4%)
Renishaw Mayfield S.A. (75%)
Measurement Devices Limited
Renishaw Software Limited
R&R Fixtures, LLC
Other smaller acquisitions
Total acquired goodwill

2016
£’000
2,886
1,784
1,738
6,661
1,559
5,168
1,472
21,268

2015
£’000
2,456
1,784
1,537
6,661
1,559
4,411
1,328
19,736

The recoverable amounts of acquired goodwill are based on value in use calculations. These calculations use cash flow projections 
based on either the financial business plans approved by management for next five financial years, or estimated growth rates, which 
are set out below. The cash flows beyond this forecast are extrapolated to perpetuity using a nil growth rate on a prudent basis, 
to reflect the uncertainties over forecasting further than five years.

Key assumptions

The key assumptions utilised in the value in use calculations are:

Discount rate

The following pre-tax discount rates have been used in discounting the projected cash flows:

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements110

Notes (continued)

9. Intangible assets (continued)

itp GmbH
Renishaw Software Limited
Measurement Devices Limited
R&R Fixtures, LLC
Renishaw Diagnostics Limited
Renishaw Mayfield S.A.

Forecast cash flows and future growth rates

itp GmbH
Renishaw Software Limited
Measurement Devices Limited
R&R Fixtures, LLC
Renishaw Diagnostics Limited
Renishaw Mayfield S.A.

2016
Discount rate
12%
12%
12%
12%
15%
15%

2015
Discount rate
12%
12%
12%
12%
15%
15%

2016
Basis of forecast
5% growth rate
5% growth rate
5 year business plan
5 year business plan
5 year business plan
5 year business plan

2015
Basis of forecast
5% growth rate
5% growth rate
5 year business plan
5 year business plan
5 year business plan
5 year business plan

These forecast cash flows are considered prudent estimates based on management’s view of the future and experience of past 
performance of the individual CGUs and are calculated at a disaggregated level. The key judgement within these business plans is the 
forecasting of revenue growth. 

The average growth rates included in the significant CGUs’ business plans are as follows:

Measurement Devices Limited
R&R Fixtures, LLC

2016
Average revenue 
growth
15%
13%

2015
Average revenue 
growth
11%
30%

These business plans are recognised as key inputs to the impairment calculation. They are monitored by management regularly and 
updated for expected variances in future performance. 

Sensitivity to key assumptions

Management have performed sensitivity analysis on the key assumptions detailed above.

Discount rate

An increase of 5% in the discount rate would not result in an impairment on any of the CGUs. Management believe any increase in 
discount rates above 5% to be remote.

Forecast cash flows and future growth rates

Given the average revenue growth assumptions included in the five-year business plans, management’s sensitivity analysis involves 
a reduction of 10% in the forecast cash flows utilised in those business plans and therefore into perpetuity. For there to be an 
impairment there would need to be a reduction of 33% in the forecast cash flows for Measurement Devices Limited and a reduction 
of 42% for R&R Fixtures, LLC. Management deem the likelihood of these reductions to be remote.

10. Investments in associates
The Group’s investments in associates (all investments being in the ordinary share capital of the associate), whose accounting years 
end on 30th June, except where noted otherwise, were:

RLS merilna tehnika d.o.o.
Metrology Software Products Limited
HiETA Technologies Limited (31st December)

Country of
incorporation
Slovenia
England & Wales
England & Wales

Ownership
2016
%
50.0
50.0
24.9

Ownership
2015
%
50.0
50.0
20.0

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201610. Investments in associates (continued)
Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Dividends received
Share of profits of associates
Other comprehensive income and expense
Additions
Balance at the end of the year

Summarised aggregated financial information for associates:

Revenue
Share of profits for the year
Assets
Liabilities

11. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
Balances at the end of the year were:

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Intragroup trading (inventory)
Pension schemes
Other
Balance at the end of the year

Assets
£’000
–
–
13,454
12,529
15,013
40,996

2016

Liabilities
£’000
(6,969)
(8,061)
–
–
(6,969)
(21,999)

Net
£’000
(6,969)
(8,061)
13,454
12,529
8,044
18,997

Assets
£’000
–
–
9,237
9,398
901
19,536

The movements in the deferred tax balance during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Movements in the Consolidated income statement
Movement in relation to the cash flow hedging reserve
Movement in relation to the pension schemes
Total movement in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense
Balance at the end of the year

The deferred tax movement in the Consolidated income statement is analysed as:

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Intragroup trading (inventory)
Pension schemes
Other
Total movement for the year

111

2016
£’000
3,480
(310)
1,451
753
284
5,658

2016
£’000
6,282
1,451
6,953
2,495

2015

Liabilities
£’000
(5,589)
(8,017)
–
–
(8,385)
(21,991)

2016
£’000
(2,455)
435
17,537
3,480
21,017
18,997

2016
£’000
(1,380)
(44)
4,217
(349)
(2,009)
435

2015
 £’000
2,230
(110)
880
–
480
3,480

2015
 £’000
5,713
880
4,978
2,393

Net
£’000
(5,589)
(8,017)
9,237
9,398
(7,484)
(2,455)

2015
 £’000
(7,271)
1,134
2,102
1,580
3,682
(2,455)

2015
 £’000
(1,150)
(293)
2,013
(323)
887
1,134

No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of tax losses carried forward of £16,393,000 (2015: £13,045,000) due to the 
uncertainty over their recoverability, as a significant proportion held in overseas subsidiaries may only be carried forward for a limited 
period of time. 

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements112

Notes (continued)

12. Derivatives
For both the Group and the Company:

Derivatives comprising the fair value of outstanding forward contracts with positive fair values are shown within:

Non-current assets
Current assets
Total of derivatives with positive fair values

Derivatives comprising the fair value of outstanding forward contracts with negative fair values are shown within:

2016
£’000
76
859
935

Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
Total of derivatives with negative fair values

2016
£’000
50,652
19,987
70,639

2015
 £’000
10,504
14,889
25,393

2015
 £’000
3,165
764
3,929

13. Employee benefits
The Group operates a number of pension schemes throughout the world. As noted in the accounting policies, actuarial valuations of 
foreign pension schemes are not obtained for the most part because of the limited number of foreign employees. The major scheme, 
which covers the UK-based employees, was of the defined benefit type. This scheme, along with the Ireland and USA defined benefit 
schemes, has ceased any future accrual for current members and these schemes are closed to new members. UK, Ireland and USA 
employees are now covered by defined contribution schemes.

The total pension cost of the Group for the year was £18,061,000 (2015: £16,347,000), of which £184,000 (2015: £178,000) related 
to directors and £4,854,000 (2015: £5,035,000) related to overseas schemes. 

The latest full actuarial valuation of the UK defined benefit scheme was carried out as at September 2015 and updated to 30th 
June 2016 by a qualified independent actuary. The mortality assumption used for 2016 is S2PMA and S2PFA tables, CMI (core) 
2014 model with long-term improvements of 0.2% per annum.

The major assumptions used by the actuary for the UK and Ireland schemes were:

Rate of increase in pension payments
Discount rate
Inflation rate (RPI)
Inflation rate (CPI)
Retirement age

30th June 2016

30th June 2015

30th June 2014

UK scheme Ireland scheme
1.5%
2.0%
1.5%
–
65

3.2%
3.2%
3.3%
2.3%
64

UK scheme
3.4%
4.0%
3.6%
2.6%
64

Ireland scheme
1.6%
3.0%
1.6%
–
65

UK scheme
3.5%
4.4%
3.7%
2.7%
64

Ireland scheme
1.9%
2.7%
1.9%
–
65

The assets and liabilities in the defined benefit schemes were:

Market value of assets:
Equities
Bonds and cash

Actuarial value of liabilities
Deficit in the schemes
Deferred tax thereon

30th June
2016
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2015
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2014
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2013
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2012
£’000

% of
total
assets

145,914
3,313
149,227
(217,050)
(67,823)
12,528

98
2
100
–
–
–

138,174
2,325
140,499
(188,593)
(48,094)
9,398

98
2
100
–
–
–

127,805
1,950
129,755
(172,823)
(43,068)
8,141

98
2
100
–
–
–

117,114
1,653
118,767
(160,485)
(41,718)
8,973

99
1
100
–
–
–

93,827
1,409
95,236
(137,224)
(41,988)
9,519

99
1
100
–
–
–

All equities have quoted prices in active markets in the UK, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Japan and emerging markets. 

Note C.35 gives the analysis of the UK defined benefit pension scheme. For the other schemes, the market value of assets at the end 
of the year was £17,646,000 (2015: £14,410,000) and the actuarial value of liabilities was £23,348,000 (2015: £16,644,000).

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016113

13. Employee benefits (continued) 
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation is around 24 years.

For a sensitivity analysis of certain elements of the UK defined benefit pension scheme, see the Financial review section of 
the Strategic report. It is expected that contributions to defined benefit schemes for the next financial year will be at a similar level to 
the current year.

The movements in the schemes’ assets and liabilities were:

Year ended 30th June 2016
Balance at the beginning of the year
Contributions paid
Interest on pension schemes
Remeasurement gain/(loss)
Benefits paid
Balance at the end of the year

Year ended 30th June 2015
Balance at the beginning of the year
Contributions paid
Interest on pension schemes
Remeasurement gain/(loss)
Benefits paid
Balance at the end of the year

Assets
£’000
140,499
2,708
5,552
3,166
(2,698)
149,227

Assets
£’000
129,755
2,427
5,547
5,028
(2,258)
140,499

Liabilities
£’000
(188,593)
–
(7,121)
(24,034)
2,698
(217,050)

Liabilities
£’000
(172,823)
–
(6,968)
(11,060)
2,258
(188,593)

Total
£’000
(48,094)
2,708
(1,569)
(20,868)
–
(67,823)

Total
£’000
(43,068)
2,427
(1,421)
(6,032)
–
(48,094)

The analysis of the amount recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense was:

Actuarial (loss)/gain arising from:
– Changes in demographic assumptions
– Changes in financial assumptions
– Experience adjustment
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
Adjustment to liabilities for IFRIC 14
Total amount recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense

The history of experience gains and losses is:

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

1,523
(24,828)
6,968
669
(5,200)
(20,868)

358
(10,095)
672
5,233
(2,200)
(6,032)

Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities
amount (£’000)
percentage of present value of scheme liabilities
Total amount recognised in the Consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income and expense
amount (£’000)
percentage of present value of scheme liabilities

Year ended
30th June 2016

Year ended
30th June 2015

Year ended
30th June 2014

Year ended
30th June 2013

Year ended
30th June 2012

6,968
3%

672
0%

2,828
2%

1,089
1%

–
–

(20,868)
(10%)

(6,032)
(3%)

(2,233)
(1%)

(860)
(1%)

(7,781)
(6%)

The cumulative amount of actuarial gains and losses recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and 
expense was a loss of £105,656,000 (2015: loss of £84,788,000).

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements114

Notes (continued)

13. Employee benefits (continued)
The assumptions used for mortality rates for members, medium cohort at the expected retirement age of 65 years are:

Male currently aged 65
Female currently aged 65
Male currently aged 45
Female currently aged 45

2016
years
21.9
23.9
23.2
25.2

2015
years
22.3
24.4
23.6
25.7

An agreement has been entered into with the trustees of the UK defined benefit pension scheme in relation to deficit funding plans 
which supersede the previous arrangements. The Company has agreed to pay all monthly pensions payments and lump sum 
payments, and transfer payments up to a limit of £1,000,000 in each year (Benefits in Payment).

A number of UK properties owned by the Company are subject to fixed charges. One or more of the properties may be released from 
the fixed charge if on a subsequent valuation, the value of all properties under charge exceed 120% of the deficit. 

The Company has also established an escrow bank account, which is subject to a floating charge. The balance of this account was 
£15,279,000 at the end of the year (2015: £14,731,000). The funds will be released back to the Company from the escrow account 
over a period of 6 years.

The agreement continues until 30th June 2031, but may end sooner if the deficit (calculated on a self sufficiency basis as defined in 
the agreement) is eliminated in the meantime. At 30th June 2031 the Company is obliged to pay any deficit at that time. All properties 
will be released from charge when the deficit no longer exists. The charges may be enforced by the trustees if one of the following 
occurs: (a) the Company does not pay any Benefits in Payment; (b) an insolvency event occurs in relation to the Company; or (c) the 
Company does not pay any deficit at 30th June 2031.

Under the Ireland defined benefit pension scheme deficit funding plan, a property owned by Renishaw (Ireland) Limited is subject to a 
registered fixed charge to secure the Ireland defined benefit pension scheme’s deficit.

No scheme assets are invested in the Group’s own equity.

The present value of projected future contributions under the new agreement relating to the UK defined benefit scheme exceeds the 
value of the deficit at the year-end, therefore, under IFRIC 14, the UK defined benefit pension scheme’s liabilities have been increased 
by £15,400,000, to represent the maximum discounted liability as at 30th June 2016 (2015: £10,200,000).

14. Inventories
An analysis of inventories at the end of the year was:

Raw materials
Work in progress
Finished goods
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
35,932
26,225
32,802
94,959

2015
£’000
28,344
20,087
29,242
77,673

During the year, the amount of inventories recognised as an expense in the Consolidated income statement was £135,718,000 
(2015: £144,547,000) and the amount of write-down of inventories recognised as an expense in the Consolidated income statement 
was £2,454,000 (2015: £1,254,000). At the end of the year, the gross cost of inventories which had provisions held against them 
totalled £10,134,000 (2015: £8,960,000).

15. Cash and cash equivalents
An analysis of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year was:

Bank balances and cash in hand
Short-term deposits
Overdraft
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
26,416
4,862
(9,975)
21,303

2015
£’000
77,282
4,889
–
82,171

The UK defined benefit pension scheme cash escrow account is shown separately within current assets. Overdrafts are shown 
separately within current liabilities.

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 201616. Provisions
Warranty provision

Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Created during the year
Utilised in the year

Balance at the end of the year

115

2016
£’000
1,715
1,878
(1,218)
660
2,375

2015
£’000
1,294
1,518
(1,097)
421
1,715

The warranty provision has been calculated on the basis of historical return-in-warranty information and other internal reports. It is 
expected that most of this expenditure will be incurred in the next financial year and all expenditure will be incurred within three years 
of the balance sheet date.

17. Other payables (current)
Balances at the end of the year were:

Payroll taxes and social security
Other creditors and accruals
Total other payables

2016
£’000
6,304
12,041
18,345

2015
£’000
5,097
23,464
28,561

The Group’s exposure to currency and liquidity risk related to trade and other payables is disclosed in note 20.

18. Other payables (non-current)
The deferred consideration in the previous year of £589,000 was in respect of investments in subsidiaries, which was payable 
between one and two years. All outstanding deferred consideration is now shown within other payables (current).

19. Capital and reserves
Share capital

Allotted, called-up and fully paid 72,788,543 ordinary shares of 20p each

2016
£’000
14,558

2015
£’000
14,558

The ordinary shares are the only class of share in the Company. Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to vote at general meetings of 
the Company and receive dividends as declared. The Articles of Association of the Company do not contain any restrictions on the 
transfer of shares nor on voting rights.

Currency translation reserve

The currency translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of 
the foreign operations, offset by foreign exchange differences on bank liabilities which have been accounted for directly in equity on 
account of them being classified as hedging instruments. 

Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Gain/(loss) on net assets of foreign currency operations
(Loss)/gain on foreign currency overdrafts held for the purpose of net investment hedging
Gain in the year relating to subsidiaries
Currency exchange differences relating to associates
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
(2,714)
28,778
(20,369)
8,409
753
6,448

2015
£’000
(2,825)
(2,390)
2,501
111
–
(2,714)

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements116

Notes (continued)

19. Capital and reserves (continued)
Cash flow hedging reserve

The cash flow hedging reserve, for both the Group and the Company, comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the 
valuation of forward exchange contracts which are effective hedges and mature after the year end. These are valued on a mark-to-
market basis, are accounted for directly in equity and are recycled through the Consolidated income statement and Company income 
statement when the hedged item affects the income statement. The forward contracts mature over the next three and a half years.

Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Amounts transferred to the income statement (within revenue)
Revaluations during the year
Deferred tax movement
Balance at the end of the year

Dividends paid

Dividends paid comprised:

2015 final dividend paid of 34.0p per share (2014: 29.87p)
Interim dividend paid of 12.5p per share (2015: 12.5p)
Total dividends paid

2016
£’000
17,171
(14,125)
(77,043)
17,537
(56,460)

2016
£’000
24,748
9,099
33,847

2015
£’000
25,580
(13,348)
2,837
2,102
17,171

2015
£’000
21,742
9,099
30,841

A final dividend in respect of the current financial year of £25,839,932 (2015: £24,748,105) at the rate of 35.5p net per share 
(2015: 34.0p) is proposed to be paid on 17th October 2016 to shareholders on the register on 16th September 2016, with an ex-
dividend date of 15th September 2016.

Non-controlling interest

Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Share of loss for the year
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
(2,638)
(524)
(3,162)

2015
£’000
(2,076)
(562)
(2,638)

The non-controlling interest represents the minority shareholdings in Renishaw Diagnostics Limited – 7.6%, Renishaw Mayfield SARL 
– 25% and Renishaw Mayfield S.A. – 25%.

20. Financial instruments
The Group has exposure to credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk arising from its use of financial instruments. This note presents 
information about the Group’s exposure to these risks, along with the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and 
managing the risks.

Fair value

There is no significant difference between the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities and their carrying value in the 
Consolidated balance sheet. All financial assets and liabilities are held at amortised cost, apart from the forward exchange contracts, 
which are held at fair value, with changes going through the Consolidated income statement unless subject to hedge accounting.

The fair values of the forward exchange contracts have been calculated by a third party expert, discounting estimated future 
cash flows on the basis of market expectations of future exchange rates, representing level 2 in the IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy. 
The IFRS 13 level categorisation relates to the extent the fair value can be determined by reference to comparable market values. 
The classifications range from level 1 where instruments are quoted on an active market through to level 3 where the assumptions 
used to arrive at fair value do not have comparable market data. 

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016117

20. Financial instruments (continued)
Credit risk

The Group carries a credit risk, being the risk of non-payment of trade receivables by its customers. Credit evaluations are carried out 
on all new customers before credit is given above certain thresholds. There is a spread of risks among a large number of customers 
with no significant concentration with one customer or in any one geographical area. The Group establishes an allowance for 
impairment in respect of trade receivables where recoverability is considered doubtful.

An analysis by currency of the Group’s financial assets at the year end is as follows:

Currency
Pound Sterling
US Dollar
Euro
Japanese Yen
Other

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Cash (including overdraft)

2016
£’000
6,520
37,183
20,757
15,195
35,290
114,945

2015
£’000
8,029
32,400
18,701
10,660
31,423
101,213

2016
£’000
12,819
667
2,504
391
2,606
18,987

2015
£’000
8,541
3,882
14,720
9,388
1,671
38,202

2016
£’000
102,149
(34,733)
(37,823)
(17,946)
9,656
21,303

2015
£’000
146,603
(31,752)
(31,959)
(11,431)
10,710
82,171

The above trade receivables, other receivables and cash are predominately held in the functional currency of the relevant entity, with 
the exception of £2,702,000 of Euro-denominated trade receivables being held in the Company, along with some foreign currency 
cash balances which are of a short-term nature. Also, see note below on net assets and associated borrowings, regarding the holding 
of foreign currency borrowings by the Company in respect of its hedging activity. 

The ageing of trade receivables past due, but not impaired, at the end of the year was:

Past due 0–1 month
Past due 1–2 months
Past due more than 2 months
Balance at the end of the year

Movements in the provision for impairment of trade receivables during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Changes in amounts provided
Amounts utilised
Balance at the end of the year

Liquidity risk

2016
£’000
16,033
5,345
6,998
28,376

2016
£’000
2,964
919
(962)
2,921

2015
£’000
16,636
5,163
2,372
24,171

2015
£’000
2,979
509
(524)
2,964

The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its 
liabilities when due, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. The Group uses monthly cash 
flow forecasts to monitor cash requirements.

In respect of net cash, the carrying value approximates to fair value because of the short maturity of the deposits and borrowings. 
Interest rates are floating and based on libor/libid, which can change over time, affecting the Group’s interest income. An increase of 
1% in interest rates would result in an increase in interest income of approximately £160,000.

The market value of forward exchange contracts is determined by reference to market data.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements118

Notes (continued)

20. Financial instruments (continued)
The contractual maturities of financial liabilities at the year end were:

Year ended 30th June 2016
Trade payables
Other payables
Provisions
Forward exchange contracts

Year ended 30th June 2015
Trade payables
Overdraft
Other payables
Provisions
Forward exchange contracts

The maturities of non-current other receivables at the year end were:

Receivable between 1 and 2 years
Receivable between 2 and 5 years

Market risk

Contractual cash flows

Carrying amount
£’000
22,379
18,345
2,375
70,639
113,738

Carrying amount
£’000
21,154
9,975
28,561
1,715
3,929
65,334

Up to 1 year
£’000
22,379
18,345
2,375
19,987
63,086

Up to 1 year
£’000
21,154
9,975
27,972
1,715
764
61,580

1–2 years 
£’000
–
–
–
22,801
22,801

1–2 years 
£’000
–
–
589
–
863
1,452

2016
£’000
76
–
76

2–5 years
£’000
–
–
–
27,851
27,851

2–5 years
£’000
–
–
–
–
2,302
2,302

2015
£’000
6,295
4,209
10,504

As noted in the Strategic report under Principal risks and uncertainties, the Group operates in a number of foreign currencies with the 
majority of sales being made in these currencies but with most manufacturing being undertaken in the UK, Ireland and India.

Exchange rates and sensitivity analysis

The Group has hedged a significant proportion of its forecasted US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen revenues and hence the impact on 
the Group’s results resulting from fluctuations in these exchange rates against Sterling is lessened.

The following are the exchange rates which have been applicable during the financial year. Also noted is the increase in profit that a 
one US Dollar cent change, a one Euro cent change and a one Japanese Yen change in exchange rate, where the foreign currency 
is strengthening against Sterling, might have on the Group’s results. The method of estimation involves assessing the impact of this 
currency on the Group’s transactions assuming all other variables are unchanged.

 2016

2015

Currency
US Dollar
Euro
Japanese Yen
Average US Dollar forward contract rates
Average Euro forward contract rates
Average Japanese Yen forward contract rates

Increase in  
group profit for 
one cent or one 
Yen movement
£’000
350
60
110

Year end  
exchange  
rate
1.57
1.41
192

Year end  
exchange  
rate
1.34
1.20
137

Average  
exchange  
rate
1.47
1.33
171
1.58
1.23
125

Average  
exchange  
rate
1.57
1.32
182
1.54
1.17
121

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016119

20. Financial instruments (continued)
The Company has US Dollar, Japanese Yen and Euro forward contracts which mature after the balance sheet date. The fair value of 
these contracts at the year end resulted in a loss carried forward of £56,460,000 (2015: profit £17,171,000) (see note 19). 

The nominal amounts of foreign currencies relating to these forward contracts are, in Sterling terms:

US Dollar
Euro
Japanese Yen

2016
£’000
354,416
132,013
81,581

2015
£’000
353,044
107,904
26,042

The Group classifies these forward contracts as cash flow hedges and states them at fair value. The forward contracts cover monthly 
revenues over the next three and a half years. Further details are noted in the treasury policies in the Financial review section of the 
Strategic report.

Net assets and associated borrowings

The Group maintains foreign currency borrowings as a method of providing hedging against the currency translation risk of the 
net assets of its overseas subsidiaries. The level of hedging in place at the year end for the major currencies and their relative base 
borrowing interest rates, were:

Currency
US Dollar
Euro
Japanese Yen

Net assets of
subsidiary
£’000
64,187
53,029
23,669

Currency
borrowing
£’000
43,187
42,606
22,159

Base borrowing
interest rate
%
0.7%
-0.3%
0.0%

The currency borrowings are short-term, with floating interest rates.

For the net assets of the overseas subsidiaries not hedged, a 1% change in exchange rates will affect reserves by approximately 
£950,000.

Capital management

The Group defines capital as being the equity attributable to the owners of the Company, which is captioned on the Consolidated 
balance sheet. 

The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base and to maintain a balance between significant returns to shareholders, with a 
progressive dividend policy, whilst ensuring the security of the Group supported by a sound capital position. The Group may adjust 
dividend payments due to changes in economic and market conditions which affect, or are anticipated to affect, group results.

21. Operating leases
The total of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases (all of which relate to land and buildings in 
subsidiaries) were:

Due in less than one year
Due between one and five years
Total future minimum lease payments

Lease payments recognised as an expense during the year were:

Total lease payments for the financial year

2016
£’000
3,165
6,239
9,404

2016
£’000
2,651

2015
£’000
2,309
4,913
7,222

2015
£’000
2,363

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements120

Notes (continued)

22. Capital commitments
Capital commitments at the end of the year, for which no provision has been made in the financial statements, were:

Authorised and committed

2016
£’000
17,783

2015
£’000
7,381

23. Contingencies
The UK banking arrangements are subject to cross-guarantees between the Company and its UK subsidiaries. These accounts are 
subject to a right of set-off.

24. Related parties
Associates and other related parties had the following transactions and balances with the Group: 

Purchased goods and services from the Group during the year
Sold goods and services to the Group during the year
Paid dividends to the Group during the year
Amounts owed to the Group at the year end
Amounts owed by the Group at the year end
Loans owed to the Group at the year end

There were no bad debts written off during the year (2015: £nil).

2016
£’000
640
8,573
310
264
411
4,366

2015
£’000
1,288
8,648
110
525
499
3,048

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016Company balance sheet

at 30th June 2016

Assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in associates
Deferred tax assets
Derivatives
Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Derivatives
Pension scheme cash escrow account
Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets

Current liabilities
Trade payables
Overdraft
Current tax
Provisions
Derivatives
Other payables
Total current liabilities

Net current assets

Non-current liabilities
Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivatives
Other payables
Total non-current liabilities

Total assets less total liabilities

Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Cash flow hedging reserve
Retained earnings
Total equity

121

notes

C.26
C.27
C.28
C.29
C.30
12

C.31
C.32

12
13

C.33
12
C.34

C.35
C.30
12
C.36

C.37

19

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

137,677
46,786
309,023
1,468
25,102
76
520,132

60,051
146,994
8,053
859
15,279
1,921
233,157

16,955
10,735
762
1,787
19,987
86,072
136,298

117,459
33,684
319,257
1,184
9,172
10,504
491,260

49,740
116,702
5,465
14,889
14,731
57,395
258,922

14,623
–
5,337
1,294
764
58,556
80,574

96,859

178,348

62,121
12,051
50,652
–
124,824

45,860
15,011
3,165
589
64,625

492,167

604,983

14,558
42
(56,460)
534,027
492,167

14,558
42
17,171
573,212
604,983

These financial statements were approved by the Board of directors on 27th July 2016 and were signed on its behalf by:

Sir David R McMurtry 
Directors

A C G Roberts

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements122

Company statement of changes in equity for the year ended 30th June 2016

Year ended 30th June 2015
Balance at 1st July 2014

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme liabilities 
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
Total other comprehensive income and expense

Total comprehensive income and expense

Dividends paid
Balance at 30th June 2015

Year ended 30th June 2016

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme liabilities
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
Total other comprehensive income and expense

Total comprehensive income and expense

Share 
capital
£’000
14,558

Share
premium
£’000
42

Cash flow 
hedging
reserve
£’000
25,580

Retained
earnings
£’000
449,290

Total
£’000
489,470

–

–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

161,945

161,945

–
(8,409)
(8,409)

(7,182)
–
(7,182)

(7,182)
(8,409)
(15,591)

(8,409) 154,763

146,354

–
14,558

–
42

–
17,171

(30,841)
573,212

(30,841)
604,983

–

–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–

–

–

8,616

8,616

–
(73,631)
(73,631)

(13,954)
–
(13,954)

(13,954)
(73,631)
(87,585)

(73,631)

(5,338)

(78,969)

Dividends paid
Balance at 30th June 2016

–
14,558

–
42

–

(33,847)
(56,460) 534,027

(33,847)
492,167

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016123

Notes to the Company financial statements

C.25. Accounting policies
The following accounting policies have been applied consistently in dealing with items which are considered material in relation to the 
financial statements of the Company. 

Basis of preparation

The financial statements were prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 “Reduced Disclosure 
Framework” (FRS 101). The Company’s shareholders were notified of, and did not object to, the use of the EU-adopted IFRS 
disclosure exemptions.

In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements of 
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU (adopted IFRS), but makes amendments where necessary in 
order to comply with the Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has 
been taken.

In the transition to FRS 101, the Company has applied IFRS 1 whilst ensuring that its assets and liabilities are measured in compliance 
with FRS 101. An explanation of how the transition to FRS 101 has affected the reported financial position and financial performance 
of the Company is provided in note C.40.

The Company has applied the exemptions available under FRS 101 in respect of the following disclosures:

–  A cash flow statement and related notes.

–  Comparative period reconciliations for share capital, tangible fixed assets and intangible fixed assets.

–  Disclosures in respect of transactions with wholly-owned subsidiaries.

–  Disclosures in respect of capital management.

–  The effects of new but not yet effective IFRS.

–  An additional balance sheet for the beginning of the earliest comparative period, following the reclassification of items in the financial  
  statements (see note C.40).

–  Disclosures in respect of the compensation of key management personnel.

As the consolidated financial statements of Renishaw plc include the equivalent disclosures, the Company has also taken the 
exemptions under FRS 101 available in respect of certain disclosures required by IFRS 13 “Fair value measurement” and the 
disclosures required by IFRS 7 “Financial instruments disclosures”.

The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the revaluation of financial instruments. 
Historical cost is generally based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for the assets. The principal accounting 
policies are set out below.

Under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own profit and 
loss account.

Investments 

Investments in subsidiary and associated undertakings are stated at cost less any provision for permanent impairment losses. 

Property, plant and equipment, and depreciation

Property, plant and equipment assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided to write off the cost 
of assets less their estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives as follows:

Freehold buildings – 50 years 
Plant and equipment – 3 to 25 years 
Motor vehicles – 3 to 4 years 
No depreciation is provided on freehold land.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises direct materials and labour plus overheads 
applicable to the stage of manufacture reached.

Research and development

Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the income statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on development 
activities is capitalised if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Company intends and has the 
technical ability and sufficient resources to complete development, future economic benefits are probable and the Company can 
measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements124

Notes to the Company financial statements (continued)

C.25. Accounting policies (continued)
Taxation

The charge for taxation is based on the Company’s profit for the year. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the 
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. 

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that they will be recovered.

Employee benefits

The Company operated a contributory pension scheme, of the defined benefit type up to 5th April 2007, after which this scheme was 
closed for future accruals to existing members and was closed to new members. Since 5th April 2007, the Company has operated a 
defined contribution scheme.

The scheme is administered by trustees who are independent of the Company finances. 

Pension scheme assets in the defined benefit scheme are measured using market value. Pension scheme liabilities are measured 
using a projected unit method and discounted at the current rate of return on a high-quality corporate bond of equivalent term 
and currency to the liability. The expected return on the scheme’s assets and the interest on the scheme’s liabilities arising from the 
passage of time are included in other finance income.

The pension scheme’s surplus, to the extent that it is considered recoverable, or deficit is recognised in full and presented on the face 
of the balance sheet, along with the related deferred tax.

Accruals are made for holiday pay, based on a calculation of the number of days holiday earned during the year, but not yet taken and 
also for the annual performance bonus.

Warranty on the sale of products

The Company provides a warranty from the date of purchase, except for those products that we install where the warranty starts 
from the date of completion of the installation. This is typically for a 12-month period, although up to three years is given for a small 
number of products. A warranty provision is included in the accounts, which is calculated on the basis of historical returns and internal 
quality reports.

Derivative financial instruments 

In accordance with its treasury policy, the Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. 

The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk arising from operational and 
financing activities. Forward exchange contracts are recognised initially at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value. 
Where a forward contract is designated as a hedge of the variability in future cash inflows, the effective part of any gain or loss on the 
forward contract is recognised directly in equity. Any effective cumulative gain or loss is removed from equity and recognised in the 
income statement at the same time as the hedged transaction. The ineffective part of any gain or loss is recognised in the income 
statement immediately.

Foreign currencies

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into Sterling at the foreign exchange rate ruling at 
that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on such translation are recognised in the income statement.

Going concern

The Company’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are 
set out in the Strategic report, where also given are details of the financial and liquidity positions. In addition, note 20 in the financial 
statements includes the Company’s objectives and policies for managing its capital, details of its financial instruments and hedging 
activities and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.

The Company has considerable financial resources at its disposal and the directors have considered the current financial projections. 
As a consequence, the directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage its business risks successfully.

After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have adequate resources to 
continue in operational existence for the next 12 months. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the 
Annual report and accounts.

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016125

Total
£’000

208,952
33,755
–
(1,073)
241,634

91,493
13,384
(920)
103,957

C.26. Property, plant and equipment

Year ended 30th June 2016
Cost
At 1st July 2015
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
At 30th June 2016
Depreciation
At 1st July 2015
Charge for the year
Released on disposals
At 30th June 2016
Net book value
At 30th June 2016
At 30th June 2015

Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000

78,975
1,061
2,141
–
82,177

12,291
1,431
–
13,722

68,455
66,684

Plant and
equipment
£’000

118,379
16,868
14,116
(684)
148,679

76,702
11,311
(531)
87,482

61,197
41,677

Motor
vehicles
£’000

Assets in the
course of 
construction
£’000

7,900
14,703
(16,257)
–
6,346

–
–
–
–

3,698
1,123
–
(389)
4,432

2,500
642
(389)
2,753

1,679
1,198

6,346
7,900

137,677
117,459

At 30th June 2016, properties with a net book value of £66,485,000 (2015: £45,033,000) were subject to a fixed charge to secure 
the UK defined benefit pension scheme liabilities. See note 13 for additional information.

Additions to assets in the course of construction comprise:

Freehold land and buildings
Plant and equipment

C.27. Intangible assets

Year ended 30th June 2016
Cost
At 1st July 2015
Additions
Re-allocation on transfer of business
Disposals
At 30th June 2016
Depreciation
At 1st July 2015
Charge for the year
Released on disposals
At 30th June 2016
Net book value
At 30th June 2016
At 30th June 2015

2016
£’000
4,398
10,305
14,703

2015
£’000
13,556
13,907
27,463

Internally 
generated 
development 
costs
£’000

Software 
licences and
intellectual 
property
£’000

89,475
12,246
–
(258)
101,463

58,824
9,116
(258)
67,682

33,781
30,651

15,215
1,954
–
(249)
16,920

12,182
1,086
(48)
13,220

3,700
3,033

Goodwill
£’000

–
–
9,305
–
9,305

–
–
–
–

9,305
–

Total
£’000

104,690
14,200
9,305
(507)
127,688

71,006
10,202
(306)
80,902

46,786
33,684

In 2013 the trade and net assets of a subsidiary undertaking were transferred to the Company at their book value which was less than 
their fair value. The cost of the Company’s investment in that subsidiary undertaking reflected the underlying fair value of its net assets 
and goodwill at the time of acquisition. 

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements126

Notes to the Company financial statements (continued)

C.27. Intangible assets (continued)
As a result of this transfer, the value of the Company’s investment in that subsidiary undertaking fell below the amount at which it was 
stated in the Company’s accounting records. Schedule 1 to the Companies Act 2006 The Large and Medium-sized Companies and 
Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008 No. 410) requires that the investment be written down accordingly and 
that the amount be charged as a loss in the Company’s profit and loss account. However, the directors considered that, as there was 
no overall loss to the Company, it failed to give a true and fair view to charge that diminution to the Company’s profit and loss account 
for the year and was instead re-allocated to goodwill and the identifiable net assets transferred. The resultant goodwill recorded in the 
Company balance sheet was £9,305,000.

C.28. Investments in subsidiaries

Balance at the beginning of the year
Impairment
Re-allocation on transfer of business (see note C.27)
Investments made during the year
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
319,257
(929)
(9,305)
–
309,023

2015
£’000
316,772
–
–
2,485
319,257

During the year, management reviewed the carrying value of certain investments in subsidiaries and, as a result, included an 
impairment write-off of £929,000 in the current year income statement. 

The following are the subsidiary undertakings of Renishaw plc as at 30th June 2016, all of which are wholly-owned, unless otherwise 
stated. The country of incorporation and registration is England and Wales unless otherwise stated. The country of incorporation 
is also the country of operation. The accounting year end for each subsidiary undertaking is 30th June unless otherwise stated. 
The shareholdings in all the subsidiary undertakings are in the ordinary share capital of those undertakings. 

Company  

Renishaw International Limited 

Renishaw (Ireland) Limited (Republic of Ireland)* 

Renishaw S.A.S. (France)* 

itp GmbH (Germany)* 

Wotton Travel Limited 

Renishaw Diagnostics Limited (92.4%) (Scotland) 

Principal activities

Overseas holding and investment company.

 Manufacture and sale of advanced precision metrology and 
inspection equipment.

Service, distribution, research and development of  
group products.

 Manufacture and sale of advanced precision metrology and 
inspection equipment.

Travel agency.

 Design, manufacture and sale of molecular diagnostics and 
surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy products.

Renishaw Mayfield S.A. (75%) (Switzerland)* 

Marketing of surgical robots for neurosurgical applications.

Renishaw Mayfield SARL (75%) (France)* 

Renishaw Metrology Systems Limited (India)* (31st March) 

MTT Technologies Limited 

 Manufacture and sale of surgical robots for 
neurosurgical applications.

 Design, manufacture and sale of advanced precision metrology 
and inspection equipment.

 Design, manufacture and sale of additive manufacturing and 
rapid prototyping systems.

Renishaw Software Limited 

Development and sale of software solutions.

R&R Fixtures, LLC (USA)* (31st December) 

Manufacture and sale of fixturing products.

Renishaw Advanced Consulting & Engineering, Inc. (USA)* 
(31st December) 

Renishaw Tehnicni Inženiring d.o.o. (Slovenia) 

Supply of dimensional measurement products and services. 

 Design and procurement of application-specific integrated 
circuits (ASICs).

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016 
 
 
127

C.28. Investments in subsidiaries (continued) 
Company – principal activity is the service and distribution of group products

Renishaw, Inc. (USA)* 

Renishaw GmbH (Germany)* 

Renishaw Ibérica S.A.U. (Spain)* 

Renishaw KK (Japan)*

Renishaw S.p.A. (Italy)*

Renishaw AG (Switzerland)*

Renishaw (Hong Kong) Limited (Hong Kong)* 

Renishaw Latino Americana Ltda. (Brazil)* (31st December) 

Renishaw Benelux BV (Netherlands)* 

Renishaw Oceania Pty Limited (Australia)*

Renishaw s.r.o. (Czech Republic)* 

Renishaw Healthcare Inc. (USA)*

Renishaw Sp. z.o.o. (Poland)* 

Renishaw AB (Sweden)* 

OOO Renishaw (Russia)* (31st December) 

Renishaw (Austria) GmbH (Austria)*

Renishaw (Korea) Limited (South Korea)* 

Renishaw (Canada) Limited (Canada)*

Renishaw (Israel) Limited (Israel)* 

Renishaw (Singapore) Pte Limited (Singapore)* 

Renishaw (Taiwan) Inc. (Taiwan)* 

Renishaw ApS (Denmark)* 

Renishaw Hungary Kft (Hungary)*

 Renishaw (Shanghai) Trading Company Limited (People’s 
Republic of China)* (31st December)

 Renishaw (Shanghai) Management Company Limited (People’s 
Republic of China)* (31st December)

Renishaw México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)*

Renishaw Oy (Finland)*

Company – non-trading (holding or dormant companies)

MTT Investments Limited 

MTT Technologies srl (Italy)* 

MTT Technologies Inc. (USA)*

Measurement Devices Limited (Scotland)

Measurement Devices US LLC (USA)* 

Renishaw R&R Inc. (USA)*

Renishaw Metrology Limited 

Renishaw PT Limited 

Renishaw Transducer Systems Limited

Renishaw Advanced Materials Limited

Measurement Devices (Australia) Pty Limited (Australia)* 

 Thomas Engineering and Construction Limited (Canada)* 
(31st December)

* Equity held by a subsidiary undertaking.

C.29. Investments in associates
Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Additions
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
1,184
284
1,468

2015
£’000
704
480
1,184

The following are the associated undertakings of Renishaw plc at 30th June 2016. The country of incorporation and registration is 
England and Wales unless otherwise stated. The country of incorporation is also the country of operation. The accounting year end 
for each associate undertaking is 30th June unless otherwise stated. The shareholdings in all the associated undertakings are in the 
ordinary share capital of those undertakings unless otherwise stated.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements128

Notes to the Company financial statements (continued)

C.29. Investments in associates (continued)
Company 

RLS merilna tehnika d.o.o. (50%) (Slovenia)* 

Metrology Software Products Limited (50%) 

Principal activities

 Manufacture and sale of angular magnetic encoder ICs, rotary 
and linear encoders, interpolator ICs, and photodiode arrays.

 Design and sale of precision software and part 
manufacturing solutions.

HiETA Technologies Limited (24.9%, Ordinary-A shares)  
(31st December) 

Design and provision of additive manufacturing solutions and 
heat exchangers.

* Equity held by a subsidiary undertaking.

C.30. Deferred tax
Balances at the end of the year were:

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Pension scheme
Other
Balance at the end of the year

Movements during the year were:

Assets
£’000
–
–
11,803
13,299
25,102

2016

Liabilities
£’000
(5,633)
(6,418)
–
–
(12,051)

Net
£’000
(5,633)
(6,418)
11,803
13,299
13,051

Assets
£’000
–
–
9,172
–
9,172

Balance at the beginning of the year
Movements during the year
Balance at the end of the year

C.31. Inventory
An analysis of inventory at the end of the year was:

Raw materials
Work in progress
Finished goods
Balance at the end of the year

C.32. Trade receivables
An analysis of trade receivables at the end of the year was:

Trade receivables
Amounts owed by group undertakings
Amounts owed by associated undertakings
Balance at the end of the year

2015

Liabilities
£’000
(4,607)
(6,130)
–
(4,274)
(15,011)

2016
£’000
(5,839)
18,890
13,051

2016
£’000
24,079
21,801
14,171
60,051

2016
£’000
10,959
131,405
4,630
146,994

Net
£’000
(4,607)
(6,130)
9,172
(4,274)
(5,839)

2015
£’000
(8,089)
2,250
(5,839)

2015
£’000
19,124
19,122
11,494
49,740

2015
£’000
11,908
101,221
3,573
116,702

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016C.33. Provisions
Provisions comprised:

Warranty provision

Movements during the year were:

Balance at the beginning of the year
Created in the year
Utilised in the year

Balance at the end of the year

129

2016
£’000
1,787

2016
£’000
1,294
1,338
(845)
493
1,787

2015
£’000
1,294

2015
£’000
948
1,202
(856)
346
1,294

The warranty provision has been calculated on the basis of historical return-in-warranty information and other quality reports. It is 
expected that most of this expenditure will be incurred in the next financial year and all expenditure will be incurred within three years 
of the balance sheet date.

C.34. Other payables (current)
An analysis of other payables due within one year at the end of the year was:

Amounts owed to group undertakings
Amounts owed to associated undertakings
Other taxes and social security
Other creditors
Balance at the end of the year

2016
£’000
82,291
209
2,736
836
86,072

2015
£’000
43,138
297
2,639
12,482
58,556

C.35. Pension scheme
The Company operated a defined benefit pension scheme, which, in April 2007, ceased any future accrual for current members 
and was closed to new members. Employees of the Company are now covered by a defined contribution scheme. See note 13 
regarding details of charges relating to the UK defined benefit pension scheme liabilities.

The total pension cost of the Company for the year was £12,915,000 (2015: £11,146,000), of which £184,000 (2015: £178,000) 
related to directors. The latest full actuarial valuation of the scheme was carried out at September 2015 and updated to 30th June 
2016 by a qualified independent actuary.

The major assumptions used by the actuary for the scheme were:

Rate of increase in pension payments
Discount rate
Inflation rate (RPI)
Inflation rate (CPI)
Retirement age

30th June 2016
3.2%
3.2%
3.3%
2.3%
64

30th June 2015
3.4%
4.0%
3.6%
2.6%
64

30th June 2014
3.5%
4.4%
3.7%
2.7%
64

The mortality assumption adopted for 2016 is S2PMA and S2PFA tables, CMI (core) 2014 model with long-term improvements of 
0.2% per annum.

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements130

Notes to the Company financial statements (continued)

C.35. Pension scheme (continued)
The assets and liabilities in the scheme were:

Market value of assets:
Equities
Bonds and cash

Actuarial value of liabilities
Deficit in the scheme
Deferred tax thereon

30th June
2016
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2015
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2014
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2013
£’000

% of
total
assets

30th June
2012
£’000

% of
total
assets

131,107
474
131,581
(193,702)
(62,121)
11,803

100
–
100
–
–
–

125,769
320
126,089
(171,949)
(45,860)
9,172

100
–
100
–
–
–

116,805
198
117,003
(154,279)
(37,276)
7,455

100
–
100
–
–
–

106,117
301
106,418
(132,685)
(26,267)
6,041

100
–
100
–
–
–

89,653
154
89,807
(126,946)
(37,139)
8,913

100
–
100
–
–
–

The history of experience gains and losses is:

Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities
amount (£’000)
percentage of present value of scheme liabilities
Total amount recognised in the statement of 
comprehensive income and expense
amount (£’000)
percentage of present value of scheme liabilities

Year ended
30th June 2016

Year ended
30th June 2015

Year ended
30th June 2014

Year ended
30th June 2013

Year ended
30th June 2012

6,609
3%

–
–

2,828
2%

–
–

–
–

(16,666)
(9%)

(8,981)
(5%)

(997)
(1%)

(1,230)
(1%)

(5,836)
(5%)

The movements in the scheme were:

Year ended 30th June 2016
Deficit in scheme at the beginning of the year
Contributions
Interest on pension scheme 
Remeasurement gain/(loss)
Benefits paid
Deficit in scheme at the end of the year

Year ended 30th June 2015
Deficit in scheme at the beginning of the year
Contributions
Interest on pension scheme 
Remeasurement gain/(loss)
Benefits paid
Deficit in scheme at the end of the year

Assets
£’000
126,089
1,796
5,030
1,137
(2,471)
131,581

Assets
£’000
117,003
1,649
5,140
4,327
(2,030)
126,089

Liabilities
£’000
(171,949)
–
(6,421)
(17,803)
2,471
(193,702)

Liabilities
£’000
(154,279)
–
(6,392)
(13,308)
2,030
(171,949)

Total
£’000
(45,860)
1,796
(1,391)
(16,666)
–
(62,121)

Total
£’000
(37,276)
1,649
(1,252)
(8,981)
–
(45,860)

All equities have quoted prices in active markets in the UK, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Japan and emerging markets. 

The weighted average duration of the defined benefit scheme obligation is around 24 years.

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016131

C.35. Pension scheme (continued)
The analysis of the amount recognised in the statement of comprehensive income and expense was:

Actuarial (loss)/gain arising from:
– Changes in demographic assumptions
– Changes in financial assumptions
– Experience adjustment
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
Adjustment to liabilities for IFRIC 14
Total recognised in the statement of comprehensive income and expense

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

1,411
(20,623)
6,609
1,137
(5,200)
(16,666)

242
(11,350)
–
4,327
(2,200)
(8,981)

C.36. Other payables (non-current)
The deferred consideration in the previous year of £589,000 was in respect of investments in subsidiaries, which was payable 
between one and two years. All outstanding deferred consideration is now shown within other payables (current).

C.37. Share capital

Allotted, called-up and fully paid 72,788,543 ordinary shares of 20p each

2016
£’000
14,558

2015
£’000
14,558

The ordinary shares are the only class of share in the Company. Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to vote at general meetings of 
the Company and receive dividends as declared. The Articles of Association of the Company do not contain any restrictions on the 
transfer of shares nor on voting rights.

C.38. Related parties
During the year, related parties, these being Renishaw Diagnostics Limited, Renishaw Mayfield SARL, Renishaw Mayfield S.A. and the 
Group’s associates (see note 10), had the following transactions and balances with the Company: 

Purchased goods and services from the Company during the year
Sold goods and services to the Company during the year
Paid dividends to the Company during the year
Amounts owed to the Company at the year end
Amounts owed by the Company at the year end
Loans owed to the Company at the year end

2016
£’000
1,049
3,963
160
264
689
16,932

2015
£’000
1,513
3,145
110
525
297
12,653

All transactions were on an arm’s length basis. There were no bad debts written off during the year (2015: £nil). 

C.39. Capital commitments
Capital commitments at the end of the year, for which no provision has been made in the financial statements, were:

Authorised and committed

2016
£’000

1,620

2015
£’000

6,328

C.40. Explanation of transition to FRS 101
As stated in note C.25, these are the Company’s first financial statements prepared in accordance with FRS 101.

The accounting policies set out in note C.25 have been applied in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 30th June 
2016, the comparative information presented in these financial statements for the year ended 30th June 2015 and in the preparation 
of an opening FRS 101 balance sheet at 1st July 2014.

In preparing its FRS 101 balance sheet, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in 
accordance with its previous basis of accounting (UK GAAP). An explanation of how the transition from UK GAAP to FRS 101 has 
affected the Company’s financial position and financial performance is set out in the following table and the accompanying notes:

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements132

Notes to the Company financial statements (continued)

C.40. Explanation of transition to FRS 101 (continued)

At 1st July 2014

Effect of 
transition to 
FRS 101
£’000

At 30th June 2015

FRS 101
£’000

UK GAAP
£’000

Effect of
transition to
FRS 101
£’000

notes

UK GAAP
£’000

Assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in associates
Deferred tax assets
Derivatives
Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Derivatives
Pension scheme cash escrow account
Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets

Current liabilities
Trade payables
Current tax
Provisions
Derivatives
Other payables
Total current liabilities

Net current assets

Non-current liabilities
Employee benefits
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivatives
Other payables
Total non-current liabilities

(i)
(ii)

(iii)
(iv)

(iv)

(iv)

(iv)
(iv)

(v)
(vi)
(iv)
(iv)

98,567
–
316,772
704
–
–
416,043

37,567
139,111
5,250
–
9,541
27,706
219,175

13,938
2,100
948
–
110,314
127,300

(2,988)
30,805
–
–
7,455
18,644
53,916

–
(31,992)
–
13,348
–
–
(18,644)

–
–
–
–
–
–

95,579
30,805
316,772
704
7,455
18,644
469,959

37,567
107,119
5,250
13,348
9,541
27,706
200,531

13,938
2,100
948
–
110,314
127,300

120,492
–
319,257
1,184
–
–
440,933

49,740
142,095
5,465
–
14,731
57,395
269,426

14,623
5,337
1,294
–
59,320
80,574

(3,033)
33,684
–
–
9,172
10,504
50,327

–
(25,393)
–
14,889
–
–
(10,504)

–
–
–
764
(764)
–

FRS 101
£’000

117,459
33,684
319,257
1,184
9,172
10,504
491,260

49,740
116,702
5,465
14,889
14,731
57,395
258,922

14,623
5,337
1,294
764
58,556
80,574

91,875

(18,644)

73,231

188,852

(10,504)

178,348

23,421
8,169
–
900
32,490

13,855
7,375
17
(17)
21,230

37,276
15,544
17
883
53,720

28,528
7,247
–
3,754
39,529

17,332
7,764
3,165
(3,165)
25,096

45,860
15,011
3,165
589
64,625

Total assets less total liabilities

475,428

14,042

489,470

590,256

14,727

604,983

Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Cash flow hedging reserve
Retained earnings
Total equity

14,558
42
25,580
435,248
475,428

–
–
–
14,042
14,042

14,558
42
25,580
449,290
489,470

(vii)

14,558
42
17,171
558,485
590,256

–
–
–
14,727
14,727

14,558
42
17,171
573,212
604,983

Financial statementsRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016133

C.40. Explanation of transition to FRS 101 (continued) 
Notes to the table of adjustments:

(i) Property, plant and equipment

Under IFRS, software assets, with a net book value of £2,988,000 at 1st July 2014 and £3,033,000 at 30th June 2015, which were 
classified as tangible fixed assets under UK GAAP, have been re-classified as intangible assets.

(ii) Intangible assets

Under UK GAAP, all research and development costs were charged to the profit and loss account in the year it which they were 
incurred. Under IFRS, certain expenditure on development activities has been capitalised as intangible assets. The amount 
capitalised, net of accumulated amortisation, was £27,817,000 at 1st July 2014 and £30,651,000 at 30th June 2015.

(iii) Deferred tax asset

The deferred tax asset under IFRS comprises deferred tax on the defined pension scheme liability of £7,455,000 at 1st July 2014 and 
£9,172,000 at 30th June 2015.

(iv) Derivatives

Under UK GAAP, derivatives, comprising the fair value of outstanding forward contracts, were included in debtors and creditors, either 
within one year or due after more than one year (see also note 12). Under IFRS these amounts have been re-classified into separate 
lines on the face of the balance sheet.

(v) Employee benefits

Under UK GAAP, the deficit on the Company’s defined benefit pension scheme was shown net of deferred tax. Under IFRS, the 
net amount of £23,421,000 has been increased by £5,855,000 at 1st July 2014 to be shown gross, as required by IFRS. At 30th 
June 2015, the net amount of £28,528,000 was increased by £7,132,000. Also, under IFRIC 14, the pension scheme liability was 
increased by £8,000,000, with a deferred tax asset of £1,600,000, at 1st July 2014 and increased by £10,200,000, with a deferred 
tax asset of £2,040,000, at 30th June 2015 (see note 13).

(vi) Deferred tax liability

The adjustments to the deferred tax liability under IFRS comprise:

(a) £5,565,000 at 1st July 2014 and £6,130,000 at 30th June 2015, in respect of the capitalised development costs noted in (ii) 
above; and

(b) £1,810,000 at 1st July 2014 and £1,634,000 at 30th June 2015 in respect of property on which industrial buildings allowances 
were previously claimed, which was excluded under UK GAAP.

 Also, the deferred tax liability has been adjusted for the re-allocation of a deferred tax asset as noted in (iii) above.

(vii) Retained earnings

Under IFRS, retained earnings have been adjusted as follows:

Capitalised development costs, net of deferred tax
Inclusion of deferred tax for industrial buildings allowance 
IFRIC 14 adjustment to pension scheme deficit
Total adjustment to retained earnings

1st July 2014
£’000
22,252
(1,810)
(6,400)
14,042

30th June 2015
£’000
24,521
(1,634)
(8,160)
14,727

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements134

10 year financial record

Results

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

note 
2014
£’000

note
2013
£’000

2012
£’000

note
2011
£’000

note
2010
£’000

note
2009
£’000

note
2008
£’000

note
2007
£’000

Overseas revenue

413,390 469,221 331,682 326,213 313,007 273,989 170,957 159,988 189,137 169,094

UK and Ireland revenue

23,208

25,499

23,816

20,668

18,885

14,761

10,650

11,259

12,020

11,789

Total revenue

Operating profit

Profit before tax

Taxation

436,598 494,720 355,498 346,881 331,892 288,750 181,607 171,247 201,157 180,883

79,513 143,924

70,388

79,071

83,188

79,286

28,095

5,991

37,335

29,729

80,036 144,196

70,106

79,193

86,046

80,410

28,725

8,843

41,715

32,672

11,465

22,850

10,720

15,046

17,008

16,345

5,745

2,105

8,309

6,532

Profit for the year

68,571 121,346

59,386

64,147

69,038

64,065

22,980

6,738

33,406

26,140

Capital employed

Share capital

Share premium

Reserves

Total equity

Statistics
Overseas revenue  
as a percentage of  
total revenue
Adjusted earnings 
per share 

2016
£’000

2015
£’000

2014
£’000

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

2011
£’000

2010
£’000

2009
£’000

2008
£’000

2007
£’000

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

14,558

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

366,785 413,918 336,163 262,119 227,799 187,118 144,021 129,162 151,725 153,400

381,385 428,518 350,763 276,719 242,399 201,718 158,621 143,762 166,325 168,000

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

94.7% 94.8% 93.3% 94.0% 94.3% 94.9% 94.1% 93.4% 94.0% 93.5%

94.9p

167.5p

82.3p

41.2p

88.9p

40.0p

95.6p

38.5p

88.5p

35.0p

32.3p

17.6p

9.6p

45.9p

35.9p

7.76p

25.39p

22.87p

Proposed dividend 

48.0p

46.5p

Note

The results and adjusted earnings per share for the years 2007 to 2011, 2013 and 2014 exclude the exceptional items. These were: 2007 and 2008 – pension curtailment 
credits (2007: £19.5m; 2008: £1.3m); 2009 – redundancy costs (£4.1m); 2010 – impairment write-down (£1.7m); 2011 – reversal of impairment write-down (£1.7m); 
2013 – gain on deferred consideration settlement (£2.9m); and 2014 – profit on disposal of shareholding in Delcam plc (£26.3m).

Shareholder informationRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016135

Shareholder information

Ordinary shares
The Company has one class of ordinary 20p shares listed 
on the London Stock Exchange under code RSW, ISIN 
number GB0007323586.

Registrars
For all enquiries about shareholders’ holdings, transfer and 
registration of shares and changes of name and address, 
contact the Company’s registrars, Equiniti Limited, or use 
www.shareview.co.uk:

Registrars and transfer office

Equiniti Limited 
Aspect House 
Spencer Road 
Lancing 
West Sussex  
BN99 6DA

Telephone: 0371 384 2169 (UK callers) 
+44 121 415 7047 (international callers)

Website: www.shareview.co.uk

Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate. Calls outside 
the UK will be charged at the applicable international rate. 
Lines open 8:30am to 5:30pm (UK time), Monday to Friday 
(excluding English and Welsh public holidays).

AGM
The AGM is held at the Company’s offices and is open for 
attendance by all shareholders. The 2016 AGM will be held 
on Thursday 13th October at the Company’s headquarters at 
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire GL12 8JR at 
12 noon. The Notice of meeting is set out in a separate circular 
to shareholders. Shareholders holding shares in the Company 
through a nominee service should arrange to be appointed 
as a corporate representative or a proxy in respect of their 
shareholding in order to attend and vote at the meeting.

Financial reports
The Annual report, together with copies of previous financial 
reports, is available at www.renishaw.com. The interim results 
and the preliminary announcement of the full year’s results are 
published on our website promptly after they have been released 
through a Regulatory Information Service.

Financial calendar
Annual general meeting

13th October 2016

Half year

31st December 2016

Half year results

January 2017

Trading update

May 2017

Final dividend

Ex-div date 15th September 2016

Record date 16th September 2016

Payment date 17th October 2016

Interim dividend (provisional)

Ex-div date 9th March 2017

Record date 10th March 2017

Payment date 10th April 2017

GovernanceShareholder informationStrategic reportFinancial statements136

Shareholder notes

Registration details and Company Secretary
Company Secretary and registered office

Norma Tang  
New Mills  
Wotton-under-Edge  
Gloucestershire   
GL12 8JR

Registered number: 1106260  
England and Wales

Telephone: +44 (0)1453 524524 
Facsimile: +44 (0)1453 524401 
email: companysecretary@renishaw.com

For the latest investor information and news, 
visit www.renishaw.com/investor

Auditor and corporate advisors
Auditor

KPMG LLP

Solicitors

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 
Burges Salmon LLP

Stockbrokers

UBS

Principal bankers

Lloyds Bank plc

Share fraud
Renishaw has received reports that our shareholders have 
received unsolicited calls from overseas firms offering to 
purchase their shares for a price in excess of the current market 
price in order to mount a hostile takeover bid. Please be aware 
that this is likely to be a scam, with the intention of obtaining 
payment from shareholders of a bond or legal fee in order 
to secure the share transaction, which never materialises, or 
obtaining an option to purchase shares with no fixed transfer 
date. There are other types of share fraud or “boiler room scams” 
and therefore if you receive any unsolicited investment advice the 
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) advises the following:

•  make sure you get the correct name of the person and 

organisation and make a record of any other information 
they give;

•  check that they are properly authorised by the FCA before 
getting involved by visiting www.fca.org.uk/register and 
contacting the firm using the details on the register;

•  the FCA also maintains a list of unauthorised overseas firms 
who are targeting or have targeted UK investors and any 
approach from such firms should be reported to the FCA so 
that the information can be kept updated;

•  report the matter to the FCA on their consumer helpline 

0800 111 6768 or using the share fraud reporting form available 
at www.the-fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam-unauthorised-
firm; and

•  you could also contact the police via the national fraud 
reporting centre Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or 
email@actionfraud.org.uk. Action Fraud will be particularly 
interested if you sent money to a bank account or other type 
of money transfer.

Shareholder profile

Shareholdings 

1 – 5,000

5,001 – 25,000

25,001 – 50,000

50,001 – 100,000

8

%

2.5

2.9

1.7

4.5

1 2

3
4

5

100,001 – 500,000 14.8

7

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

500,001 – 1,000,000

7 1,000,001 – 3,000,000

8.3

7.9

8 more than 3,000,000 57.4

3

Shareholdings 

1 Directors

2 Individuals

3 Institutions

%

53.1

1.6

45.3

2

1

Shareholder informationRenishaw plc Annual report and accounts 2016Design and production by Radley Yeldar | ry.com

Printed on FSC certified, 100% post-consumer content paper using fully sustainable, 
vegetable oil-based inks.

Print production system registered to ISO 14001-2004, ISO 9001-2008 and EMAS standards.

A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

1

6

Renishaw plc
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, 
Gloucestershire GL12 8JR 
United Kingdom
T +44 (0) 1453 524524
F +44 (0) 1453 524401
E uk@renishaw.com

For more information visit:
www.renishaw.com