Quarterlytics / Technology / Hardware, Equipment & Parts / Renishaw / FY2024 Annual Report

Renishaw
Annual Report 2024

RSW · LSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker RSW
Exchange LSE
Sector Technology
Industry Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Renishaw
Loading PDF…
Renishaw plc
Annual Report 2024
Transforming Tomorrow Together

About us
What we do
We are a world leader in measuring and 
manufacturing systems. Our products give 
high accuracy and precision, gathering 
data to provide customers and end users 
with traceability and confidence in what 
they’re making. This technology also helps 
our customers to innovate their products 
and processes.
Why we do it
We are guided by our purpose: 
Transforming Tomorrow Together 
This means working with our customers 
to make the products, create the materials, 
and develop the therapies that are going 
to be needed for the future.
We believe that our purpose is incredibly 
relevant in today’s environment where the 
pace of change in technology is faster 
than ever. We also know that the future will 
be a world of scarce resources, needing 
high-performance, intelligent, personalised 
solutions that make the best use of these 
resources. Our expertise can help deliver this. 
Where we operate
We are a global business. We work closely 
with our customers around the world to solve 
complex engineering and science challenges 
and improve their products and processes.
We have two business segments: 
Manufacturing technologies, and Analytical 
instruments and medical devices. You can 
find an overview of these on pages 29 to 34.
We operate in three regions: the Americas, 
APAC and EMEA. Most of our R&D and 
manufacturing takes place in the UK, 
and we have other major manufacturing 
sites in Ireland and India.
Sales locations
Revenue
Americas
7
£164.4m
(FY2023: £161.5m)
APAC
30
£318.8m
(FY2023: £310.6m)
EMEA
22
£208.0m
(FY2023: £216.5m)
How we do it
Our vision is to innovate and transform the 
capabilities of our customers and end users 
through unparalleled levels of:
Precision
Productivity
Practicality
While our vision sets our direction, our 
strategy is our route to getting there.
We set out our strategy on pages 7 to 9. 
Our strategy supports our sustainable 
long-term growth by ensuring we have 
the agility and resources to identify and 
respond to opportunities in our markets.
Our purpose, vision and strategy are 
supported by our values of innovation, 
inspiration, integrity and involvement. 
These values guide the way we behave 
and the decisions we make, both as 
a business and as individual employees.

Our business in numbers
£691.3m
Revenue 
(FY2023: £688.6m)
£122.6m
Adjusted1 profit before tax
(FY2023: £141.0m)
£122.6m
Statutory profit before tax 
(FY2023: £145.1m)
76.2p
Total dividend per share for the year
(FY2023: 76.2p)
£71.1m
R&D expenditure 
(FY2023: £72.5m)
67
Key locations
5,256
Worldwide employees2
366
Graduates and apprentices employed 
(FY2023: 343)
Contents
Strategic report
02	
Chairman’s statement
04	
Chief Executive’s review
07	
Our strategy for long-term value creation
10	
Our business model
11	
Risk management
19	
Viability statement
20	
Our key performance indicators
23	
How we engage with stakeholders
26	
Financial review
29	
Review of product groups
35	
ESG review
46	
Climate-related Financial Disclosures statement
52	
Non-financial and sustainability 
information statement 
Governance report
54 	 Directors’ Corporate Governance Report
56 	 Board of Directors
58 	 Executive Committee
64	
Section 172 statement 
70 	
Nomination Committee Report
76 	
Audit Committee Report
82 	
Directors’ Remuneration Report
95 	 Other statutory and regulatory disclosures
99 	 Directors’ responsibilities
Financial statements
102	 Independent Auditor’s Report
113	 Financial statements contents
114	 Consolidated income statement
115	 Consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income and expense
116	 Consolidated balance sheet
117	 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
118	 Consolidated statement of cash flow
119	 Notes (forming part of the Consolidated 
financial statements)
155	 Company balance sheet
156	 Company statement of changes in equity
157	 Notes to the Company financial statements
Shareholder information
167	 10-year financial record
168	 Glossary
169	 Shareholder information
We use abbreviations and trademarks within this document. 
For brevity, we don’t define or identify these every time they 
are used; please refer to the glossary on page 168 for this 
information. In our narrative commentaries in this report, 
as an example, FY2024 means the financial year ended 
30 June 2024. Other dates in our narrative commentary, 
such as 2024, refer to the calendar year.
1	 Note 29, Alternative performance measures, defines 
how each of these measures is calculated. Alternative 
performance measures (APMs) are non-IFRS measures that 
we believe give readers additional useful and comparable 
views of our underlying performance. They should be 
considered in addition to statutory measures, and not 
as a substitute for or as superior to them.
2	 As at 30 June 2024.
1
STRATEGIC REPORT
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Strategic report
Chairman’s statement
It’s been another busy year for Renishaw, in which 
we achieved record sales despite a challenging 
trading environment. We continued to make solid 
progress against our long-term strategy, which 
includes delivering innovative new products 
and developing our sales and manufacturing 
infrastructure to support future growth. While profit 
is lower this year, we propose to maintain our dividend. 
We remain committed to our growth strategy and 
are confident in our future prospects. 
Our progress this year was once again due to the 
talent and dedication of our people, and I would 
like to thank them all for their hard work.
I am inspired by their passion and have always 
been impressed with their pioneering spirit. And I am 
also proud that our collective determination to push 
technological boundaries and help our customers 
solve problems is driven by our purpose of 
Transforming Tomorrow Together, and built on 
our values of innovation, inspiration, integrity and 
involvement. Our employees demonstrate these 
values every day, as shown again this year by 
the excellent entries in our annual global values 
competition, described on page 23. 
At the end of our financial year, Sir David McMurtry 
informed the Board that he was stepping down from 
his role as Executive Chairman. On behalf of all Board 
members, employees, customers, shareholders, 
indeed all stakeholders, I would like to thank him 
for his exceptional leadership of the Company. 
Since co-founding Renishaw in 1973, he has been 
instrumental in building what is today a world-class 
business, and we are delighted that we will retain the 
benefit of his vast knowledge and experience as he 
remains on the Board as a Non-executive Director. 
Recognising the huge achievements of Sir David and 
John Deer, our founders, I am honoured to have been 
asked to take on the role of Interim Chairman of the 
Board from 1 July 2024 while we search for a new 
independent Non-executive Chair. We also welcomed 
Richard McMurtry to the Board as a Non-executive 
Director, also with effect from 1 July 2024. Richard 
is a highly experienced director and investor who 
supports start-ups committed to developing the 
future of innovation in the UK. He trained as an 
engineer with significant involvement in product 
development and robotic systems.
Innovation: thinking creatively, and 
sparking new ideas
We put innovation at the heart of everything we do. 
It’s what sparks new ideas and leads to new products. 
That’s why we continue to invest in research and 
development and engineering, with total expenditure 
rising 6% this year to £106.8m. We introduced a range 
of new products, many of them showcased at the 
EMO Hannover and Formnext exhibitions. 
Having seen Sir David McMurtry work alongside 
our Additive Manufacturing (AM) team this year, 
I was especially pleased to see the launch of our 
TEMPUS technology, which helps significantly 
reduce build times. This is a big step forward in 
an increasingly important market for us. Sir David 
has told me how it has been a pleasure to work 
alongside our AM team, and, in particular, to help 
our graduates and apprentices develop their ideas 
and creative thinking. 
Inspiring the next generation 
of engineers 
I am also pleased to see the progress our Early 
Careers team is making in their work to encourage 
and support the next generation of engineers and 
scientists. Our company and the sector as a whole 
rely on a strong pipeline of talent, and we need to 
help ensure that pipeline is filled from as wide a pool 
as possible, since diversity of thought is essential for 
creativity and innovation. So this year, our team has 
focused particularly on working with all-girls’ and 
special education needs and disability (SEND) 
schools, as well as schools located in socio-
economically disadvantaged areas. Meanwhile, 
our new STEM Centre at our headquarters in 
Gloucestershire and established STEM Centre at our 
site in Miskin, Wales, give us more opportunities to 
engage with young people from underrepresented 
groups. The feedback we receive from schools 
demonstrates why this work matters, with one teacher 
telling us that her students are too often underestimated 
and that their visit to the Centre had helped them 
“to look to their future and what they can achieve.”
A responsible business that acts 
with integrity
We are committed to acting with integrity and doing 
the right thing – for our people, customers, suppliers, 
shareholders and society. In November 2023, we 
reinforced that commitment with the global launch 
of our new Code of Conduct. Called ‘Doing Business 
Responsibly’, the Code is a guide to help our 
employees and business partners to do business 
in line with our values. We provide more details of 
our Code on page 45.
Acting with integrity includes complying with all the 
relevant laws and regulations wherever we work. 
With that in mind, the Board welcomes the publication 
of the 2024 UK Corporate Governance Code and is 
now working on plans to apply this new Code from 
FY2026, except for provision 29, which will apply to 
us from 1 July 2026.
Find out more 
about how we 
support SEND 
schools and 
colleges.
2
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

I am also delighted that we have a new environmental, 
social and governance (ESG) strategy, and an 
ESG Steering Committee to oversee progress. 
The strategy has three overarching goals: to work 
with our customers and suppliers towards Net Zero; 
develop a diverse and inclusive team that is inspired 
to work for a responsible business; and ensure we 
have the appropriate governance arrangements in 
place to provide accountability, transparency, 
compliance and integrity as a responsible business. 
We’ve structured our sustainability-related information 
in this year’s Annual Report around our new strategy 
in our ESG review on pages 35 to 45. We also provide 
further details on our goals and progress. 
Involving our stakeholders to create 
a stronger company
One of the most important aspects of our ESG 
strategy is its focus on our people. Our employees 
are our most valuable asset and it is essential that 
they feel able to share their views and are confident 
that we will respond. 
As a Board, we regularly hear from employees, 
including through Catherine Glickman, as our 
employee engagement ambassador. We also use 
site visits to hear what’s on people’s minds and 
our engagement with some of our senior leaders 
provides further opportunities to understand what 
employees think.
We are a growing, global organisation, and I was 
pleased to see the response to our first global 
employee engagement survey in April 2024 (see 
page 43). Our overall engagement score of 74% 
places us above the global average recorded by 
our survey provider. We intend to use this as our 
benchmark in future surveys and will respond to 
feedback over the coming year to ensure we continue 
to attract and retain the most talented individuals. 
That includes attracting diverse and experienced 
talent to support our Board. So I am pleased to also 
welcome our newest independent Non-executive 
Director, Professor Dame Karen Holford, who brings 
key engineering and research and development 
skills to the Board. 
Succession is an important topic for us, and following 
a review of our Board composition, we’ve now begun 
work to identify and recruit a new independent 
Non-executive Director, in addition to the 
independent Chair that I mentioned earlier.
One of the best ways we can retain people is with 
a supportive, inclusive working environment, which 
is why we are focusing particularly on inclusion in 
our ESG strategy. This year, we have continued 
to develop our equality, diversity and inclusion 
programme including the launch of new UK 
employee-led resource groups to support our 
neurodiverse and disabled colleagues and new 
workshops for our growing network of ‘allies’. 
We’ve also marked key events to build a sense of 
global community, such as Deaf Awareness Week 
and various religious festivals.
Effective leadership is critical to employee engagement 
and our long-term success. This year, our Senior 
Leadership Team worked with a specialist consultancy 
to strengthen their leadership and teamwork skills. 
They also set ambitious internal targets to make 
changes in areas like product innovation and 
employee productivity across the whole organisation, 
and are developing a new framework to drive strategy 
delivery across the Group.
The views of all our stakeholder groups inform our 
decision-making. This year, following feedback 
from shareholders, we made important changes 
in our Investor Relations Policy to allow for more 
engagement about our strategy for growth with 
key shareholders and potential investors. We also 
appointed Peel Hunt as our new joint corporate 
broker to work alongside our existing broker, UBS, 
to help us strengthen our links with the wider 
investment community. We aim to provide attractive 
returns for our shareholders and pursue a progressive 
dividend policy.
A strategy for the long term
Our business has always been focused on 
sustainable, long-term value creation. The Board 
is confident that our strategy of organically growing 
in existing markets, increasing the value of our 
technology and extending into adjacent markets will 
continue to maximise the potential of our sensors 
and software-enabled systems, and deliver further 
growth. It is an ambitious strategy for a pioneering 
company. Our success will depend on all our 
stakeholders, and our continuing determination 
to innovate in everything we do.
Sir David Grant
Interim Non-executive Chairman
11 September 2024
3
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
This has been a year of solid strategic progress, 
despite challenging conditions in the semiconductor 
manufacturing equipment markets and currency 
headwinds. We maintained our investments for 
long-term success and achieved record revenue of 
£691.3m, boosted by a strong fourth quarter, with 
0.4% annual growth at actual exchange rates and 
underlying annual growth of 3.7% at constant 
currency*. Adjusted* profit before tax of £122.6m was 
13% lower than last year, while statutory profit before 
tax of £122.6m was 16% lower, with both measures 
primarily affected by currency movements and 
increased employee pay. 
Achieving these results in a challenging environment 
is testament to the skill and efforts of our teams and 
I am fortunate to meet many of them during my travels 
around the Group. I am always inspired by their 
passion, energy and commitment to our purpose, 
and would like to thank them for their contributions 
to our progress.
We again delivered good growth in systems sales – 
one of our strategic priorities (see pages 7 to 9) – 
including our Additive Manufacturing (AM) products 
and record sales for our Spectroscopy product line. 
While we saw a gradual recovery in our optical 
encoder sales as the year progressed, weaker 
demand from the semiconductor sector affected 
sales of our laser encoder and calibration products.
At the end of the year, we announced some changes 
to the Board, including the decision by Sir David 
McMurtry to step down from his role as Executive 
Chairman. Since founding Renishaw with John Deer 
over 50 years ago, he has been instrumental in 
driving the success of our business. Sir David has 
been a constant inspiration throughout my own 
career, which is why I am delighted that he is 
remaining on the Board as a Non-executive Director 
and that he will continue to share his expertise in 
product innovation with us. I would like to thank 
Sir David Grant for taking on the role of Interim 
Non-executive Chairman while we appoint 
a permanent successor. 
Group performance 
Total revenue for the year was £691.3m, compared 
with £688.6m in FY2023. Revenue at constant 
exchange rates, excluding the impact of forward 
contracts, was £25.4m higher than the previous year. 
At actual and constant currency rates we had growth 
in our APAC region, with growth in Manufacturing 
technologies revenue, boosted by sales from the 
Industrial Metrology (IM) product group. We continue 
to see pricing pressures in China from emerging 
local competitors. The Americas also achieved 
growth at both actual and constant currency rates. 
This followed a very strong second half of the year, 
with constant currency growth from Manufacturing 
technologies, most notably from the AM product 
group and shop-floor gauging and co-ordinate 
measuring machine (CMM) systems product line. 
Our EMEA region had lower revenue at both actual 
and constant currency rates, with lower Manufacturing 
technologies revenue than FY2023. This was due 
to reduced sales from the IM, AM and Position 
Measurement (PM) product groups, which offset 
strong growth in the Analytical instruments and 
medical devices segment.
Revenue for our Manufacturing technologies segment 
was £648.1m, with no growth over the previous year, 
but 3.4% higher at constant currency rates. All our 
IM product lines grew, with record revenue for our 
shop-floor gauging and CMM systems product line 
boosted by demand from the consumer electronics 
sector. Our AM systems also had good growth, with 
a strong second half for sales from key customers in 
the medical sector. PM revenue was lower compared 
to FY2023, with weaker demand for laser encoders, 
which are supplied into front-end semiconductor 
applications. Revenue was also lower in calibration 
products, which saw lower demand from 
manufacturers of machine tools and semiconductor 
equipment. However, during the year we saw four 
quarters of sequential growth from PM, with signs 
of recovery in demand for our position encoders 
from semiconductor equipment builders. 
Meanwhile, our Analytical instruments and medical 
devices segment achieved record revenue of 
£43.2m, delivering 7.2% growth at both actual and 
constant currency. We have once again achieved 
record Spectroscopy revenue, with a general market 
improvement within EMEA for sales of Raman 
spectrometers, where we have expanded our sales 
team, and growing sales for our Virsa Raman 
Analyser. This product, which is used for in-situ 
analysis, is being adopted for a wide range of 
applications, from chemical processing to art 
restoration. We are seeing increasing sales of our 
inLux interface, used inside scanning electron 
microscopes (SEMs). Sales of our Neurological 
products also grew, including sales of our neuromate 
surgical robot in EMEA, driven by its use in 
stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) procedures 
to diagnose patients with epilepsy. For more 
information about our products and market drivers 
see pages 29 to 34.
This year’s Adjusted profit before tax was £122.6m, 
compared with £141.0m last year. Adjusted* earnings 
per share was 133.2p, compared with 155.1p last 
year. Adjusted measures are the ones we use as a 
Board to measure our underlying trading performance. 
Chief Executive’s review
*Note 29, Alternative performance measures, defines how each of these measures is calculated.
4
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

This reduction in profit primarily relates to the impact 
of currency and increased employee pay, including 
£2.1m of severance costs. Statutory profit before tax 
was £122.6m, compared with £145.1m last year, 
leading to Statutory earnings per share of 133.2p, 
compared with 159.7p last year. For more details, 
see the Financial review on pages 26 to 28.
A strategy underpinned by our purpose 
and ambition
Our purpose of Transforming Tomorrow Together 
underpins our business. By working closely with our 
customers to help them to achieve their goals, we are 
well positioned to meet our growth ambitions, pursuing 
attractive opportunities arising from global trends 
such as industrial automation and decarbonisation.
For example, our products, such as Equator gauges, 
position encoders and AM systems, support our 
customers to create the factories and products of 
the future, helping them to automate repetitive tasks 
and use energy and materials more efficiently. 
We are a manufacturing technology powerhouse, 
developing and expanding into new, close-adjacent 
markets. We are solving customer problems with 
innovative products, delivered through world-class 
in-house manufacturing and global service. Our 
portfolio includes market-leading sensors, which we 
are augmenting with a growing range of high-value 
systems products, enabled by innovative software. 
In financial terms, our goal is to continue our 
track record of long-term organic revenue growth. 
We operate in cyclical markets and are targeting 
high single-digit average growth through these cycles, 
combined with Adjusted* operating profit margins in 
excess of 20% (see our key performance indicators 
on pages 20 to 22). Our track record of through-cycle 
growth over several decades gives us the confidence 
that we have both the opportunity and the capability 
to continue to deliver at this rate in the future. 
Our long-term value creation model, detailed as 
part of the strategy (see pages 7 to 9), explains 
our three areas of strategic focus, and the technical 
and commercial activities that will drive our growth. 
These are: 
1.	 growing our existing markets;
2.	 increasing the value to Renishaw of the 
technology that we sell; and 
3.	 extending into new, high-growth markets. 
As I explain in the next sections, we have made good 
progress against each of these during the year.
Growing our existing markets 
Here, we are aiming to increase revenue by driving 
up probe fitment levels, offering higher value sensors, 
and by winning more customers that build machinery. 
This requires strong, ongoing investment in research 
and development to keep creating the products that 
will differentiate us from our competitors and help us 
to make the most of new opportunities as they arise. 
This year, that continued investment led to the launch 
of the RMP24-micro, the world’s smallest wireless 
machine tool probe. This allows us to target compact 
machine tools, used to make high-precision miniature 
components for the medical, watchmaking and 
micro-mechanics sectors, where probe fitment wasn’t 
previously possible. This compact probe is the first of 
a new generation of smart factory sensors to use our 
RMI-QE radio transmission technology. Introduced 
in FY2022, this technology allows the use of much 
smaller batteries due to its lower power consumption. 
We continued to grow revenue from our FORTiS 
enclosed position encoders, where we see significant 
opportunities. We also won new business for our 
position encoders from machine builders in a wide 
range of sectors. 
Increasing the value of the technology 
we sell
Our second strategic focus is designed to help 
us increase revenue by providing our end-user 
customers with complete solutions to capture 
a greater proportion of their investment. In IM, 
for example, we are focused on growing our sales 
of systems like our AGILITY CMMs and Equator 
gauges and expanding our metrology software 
offering. We are also developing our Renishaw 
Central smart factory software platform, which helps 
users identify trends in their measurement data and 
provides intelligent feedback to machining processes. 
As I mentioned earlier, we had a good year for 
systems sales, with above-market rates of growth 
in some areas. Given our relatively low market share 
in our newer markets, we see significant opportunities 
to continue this growth. The strong growth we’re 
seeing in our Equator gauge sales is helped by the 
continuing trend for greater automation of process 
control on shop-floor machinery. 
£691.3m
Revenue 
(FY2023: £688.6m)
£122.6m
Adjusted profit before tax 
(FY2023: £141.0m)
5
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Chief Executive’s review continued
During the year, we began rolling out our new 
generation of metrology software, MODUS IM Gauge 
& Control, which aims to widen the process control 
market for our Equator gauging system through 
simpler programming. A number of customers 
have been trialling the software, and their feedback 
has reinforced our confidence in the significant 
benefits that it delivers and helped us further 
refine its capabilities. One US-based subcontract 
manufacturer has been impressed with the ease with 
which it could quickly develop its own programmes 
for gauging its precision bearings. 
We’ve also seen some early market interest in 
Renishaw Central, which we launched in FY2023. 
This is a conservative market that takes time to adopt 
new ways of working, so early customer feedback is 
helping us learn the right way to position and market 
this product.
It was a good year for AM systems sales growth, 
with a strong second half, thanks to repeat business 
with key customers within the medical sector. We also 
took an important step forward with the launch of our 
new TEMPUS technology for our RenAM 500 series 
products, which allows a machine’s lasers to continue 
to operate, even while a new layer of metal powder 
is being laid down. As a result, the technology can 
reduce the time it takes to build a component 
by up to 50%, helping our customers to improve 
productivity and reduce cost per part. Historically 
that cost has been a significant barrier to AM 
adoption, so we see substantial opportunities for 
TEMPUS technology to broaden AM’s application, 
particularly since it is both a standard fitment on the 
new RenAM 500 Ultra machine and available as 
a paid upgrade.
Extending into new, high-growth markets
Our third strategic focus is to diversify into close-
adjacent markets where we have strong market 
understanding and brand awareness. Our new 
industrial automation products, which we launched 
at the end of FY2023, are a good example. We have 
seen a positive response from customers during the 
first year, and we are confident that we have an 
effective range of products to enhance robot precision. 
That confidence was boosted when FANUC, one of 
the world’s largest manufacturers of industrial robots, 
chose to include our products in a demonstration at 
Automatica, the world’s leading trade show for smart 
automation and robotics. Our current focus is to 
expand our regional sales teams, continue to build 
relationships and develop routes to market.
For more information on our strategy and business 
model, see pages 7 to 10. 
Sustainability
We will only achieve our ambition, and deliver on our 
strategy and purpose, by supporting our stakeholders, 
all of whom have a role to play in our continuing 
success. You can read more about how we engage 
with our key stakeholder groups on pages 23 to 25. 
Increasingly, that engagement includes discussions 
on the part Renishaw can play in supporting the 
transition to a more sustainable future. So, I was 
very pleased to become Chair of our new ESG 
Steering Committee. This formalises our management 
of sustainability-related issues, including our climate-
related financial disclosures. One of the Committee’s 
first tasks was to oversee the development of a new, 
comprehensive ESG strategy, with support from 
specialist advisers, which we explain in more detail 
in our new ESG review on pages 35 to 45. 
We have continued to make strong progress towards 
our target of Net Zero for Scope 1 and 2 emissions 
by 2028. And we see significant commercial 
opportunities as decarbonisation is one of the 
structural drivers that underpin our markets, 
with more of our customers pursuing their own 
Net Zero goals. 
Outlook for the next 12 months
The start of FY2025 has seen continuing 
improvement in demand for our encoder products 
from the semiconductor manufacturing sector, 
primarily in the APAC region. This, together with 
a range of growth opportunities that we are pursuing, 
especially for metrology and additive manufacturing 
systems, means that we are expecting to achieve 
solid revenue growth in the year ahead.
We continue to focus on improving productivity in all 
areas. We expect these efforts, together with higher 
sales volumes, to drive our operating profit margin 
towards our target, although inflationary pressures, 
especially people costs, will affect the rate of 
improvement in the near term.
The progress we’ve made against our three key 
strategic focus areas this year gives me confidence 
in our organic growth strategy, and we continue 
to invest for long-term success.
Will Lee
Chief Executive
11 September 2024
6
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Our strategy for long-term 
value creation
We are a manufacturing technology powerhouse, and our strategy aims to fulfil 
our purpose of Transforming Tomorrow Together by creating long-term value 
for all our stakeholders. We pursue leading positions in an expanding range of 
high-growth markets for our portfolio of sensor- and software-enabled systems 
products. We target high single-digit average through-cycle organic growth 
and more than 20% Adjusted operating profit margin while delivering on our 
ESG strategy, including our commitment to Net Zero. For more information, 
see our key performance indicators (KPIs) on page 20 to 22.
Our strategy: driving consistent 
outperformance see page 9
Growing in 
existing markets
Increasing 
technology value
Extending into 
new markets
STRATEGIC 
PRIORITIES
Fitment levels, 
cross sales and 
new customers
Systems, software 
and smart 
factory solutions
Robotics 
and industrial 
automation
CAPITAL 
ALLOCATION
Commercial 
focus
Innovation
In-house 
manufacturing
Our ESG strategy see pages 35 to 45
Our strategy is underpinned by a robust 
risk management framework. 
See pages 11 to 18.
We measure our progress against 10 KPIs 
that reflect financial and non-financial 
performance. See pages 20 to 22.
Manufacturing 
machine 
performance
Electrification 
and digitalisation
Industrial 
automation
Decarbonisation
Our opportunity: well positioned in markets 
growing at more than 5%1 per annum see page 8
£6bn 
Total addressable 
market2
Future
R&D in 
attractive 
close-adjacent 
markets
Emerging3
Rapid share 
gain to grow 
profit %
Established4
Number 1 or 2 
market share 
Profitable and 
growing
PORTFOLIO 
GROWTH
1	 Estimated weighted average through-cycle demand growth of Renishaw’s addressable markets. 
2	 Unaudited management estimates from a combination of external market research and Company market knowledge.
3	 Emerging portfolio products operate in more fragmented markets with significant opportunity to gain market share; they are typically below the scale 
needed to generate our target level of return.
4	 Established portfolio products have a strong, profitable market position (Number 1 or 2 market share) in growing markets.
7
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Our strategy for long-term value creation continued
Our opportunity
We pursue innovation-led growth in both emerging and established markets with 
a combined addressable value of £6bn, and where manufacturing and societal 
trends contribute to attractive through-cycle growth rates of at least 5%. We are well 
positioned to grow market share in fast-moving emerging markets, while building on 
our first- or second-place positions in many established markets, where we average 
a more than 20% share. 
MANUFACTURING TRENDS
CHANGES IN WIDER SOCIETY
Manufacturing machine performance
A relentless drive to improve the precision, 
speed and capability of manufacturing 
equipment to make the advanced products 
of the future.
Industrial automation
Industrial processes are becoming more 
automated as manufacturers grapple 
with skilled labour shortages and aim 
to become more productive.
Electrification and digitalisation
As the world becomes more electrified 
and connected, we are seeing sweeping 
changes in the transportation, electronics 
and semiconductor industries.
Decarbonisation
The drive to decarbonise is forcing 
manufacturers to rethink how they design, 
make and support future products to 
minimise environmental impact.
Established 
products:
Metrology 
sensors and styli
Open encoders
Calibration
Spectroscopy
Emerging 
products:
Metrology 
systems and 
software
Additive
manufacturing
Enclosed 
encoders
Industrial 
automation
£6bn 
Total addressable 
market
Our opportunity: well positioned in markets growing 
at more than 5% per annum
8
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Our three strategic focus areas
To make the most of the opportunities presented by our attractive growth markets, 
we’ve identified six strategic priorities, grouped in three core areas, to help drive 
market growth and help us grow market share ahead of our competition. 
Our focus on these areas is set within a rigorous risk management framework, 
which includes our approach to climate risk (see page 11), and is underpinned 
by our ESG strategy. 
Our ESG goals and objectives are set out on pages 35 to 45. 
Our strategy: driving consistent outperformance
Growing in existing markets
Increasing technology value
Extending into 
new markets
STRATEGIC PRIORITY
Increase 
revenue per 
machine tool
Win new 
machine 
builder 
customers
Build 
systems 
sales
Expand 
software 
offering
Smart 
factory 
solutions
Diversify into 
close-adjacent 
markets
WHY IT DRIVES PERFORMANCE
We can drive value 
by capturing more 
‘share of wallet’ 
from machine tool 
builders by driving 
up probing fitment 
levels and offering 
higher-value 
sensors.
New accounts 
contribute 
significantly to our 
growth rate, so we 
continue to focus 
on acquiring more 
customers that 
build machinery, 
particularly in 
position encoders.
We capture a greater 
proportion of end-user 
investment by 
providing a complete 
systems solution.
We have the 
opportunity to grow 
from our current 
low market share, 
accessing long-term 
service revenues.

Software is both an 
enabler for systems 
sales – making 
them easier to use 
and sell – and 
a revenue stream 
in its own right.
Smart factory 
solutions can drive 
recurring software 
revenue streams 
by helping users 
identify and respond 
to trends in their 
measurement data.
We aim to add to 
our portfolio of 
businesses over 
time, seeking 
opportunities where 
we have market 
understanding 
and brand traction.
HIGHLIGHTS FROM FY2024
Launch of the 
RMP24-micro, the 
world’s smallest 
wireless machine 
tool probe. This 
allows us to target 
compact machine 
tools, where probe 
fitment wasn’t 
previously possible.
Grew revenue 
from our FORTiS 
enclosed position 
encoders.
We won business 
from new machine 
builder customers 
in a wide range of 
sectors for our laser, 
optical and magnetic 
encoders.
Grew sales of 
systems including 
REVO 5-axis CMM 
inspection systems 
and Equator gauges 
driven by the trend 
for measurement 
closer to shop-floor 
machining processes.
Launch of our new 
TEMPUS technology 
for our RenAM 500 
series, which will 
broaden the 
applications for AM.
Started the roll-out of 
our new generation 
of metrology 
software, MODUS 
IM Gauge & Control. 
This aims to simplify 
programming and 
increase sales of our 
Equator gauging 
system.
Early market interest 
in Renishaw Central, 
launched in FY2023, 
which allows users 
to capture actionable 
data for process 
control. 
Positive customer 
response to our new 
industrial automation 
line, launched at the 
end of FY2023. 
Early success with 
a major aerospace 
company that will 
be equipping 12 
worldwide facilities 
with our kits to 
ensure consistency 
of robot operation.
9
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Our business model
We work with our customers to understand their technological challenges, then design, 
manufacture and sell innovative products and processes to solve them.
Our business model helps us focus our resources and make the most of our strengths 
to deliver value for all our stakeholders.
Customer relationships
We’re able to invest in long-term relationships with our 
customers. This helps us to understand their needs and 
design solutions to solve their challenges.
People
Our 5,256* talented people around the world are 
committed to delivering our purpose, vision and strategy.
Supplier relationships
Our global and local suppliers provide us with the 
high-quality components and materials we need, 
as well as supporting our infrastructure and operations.
Research and development
Our strong IP portfolio and significant commitment to 
R&D expenditure helps set us apart from competitors 
and delivers long-term value.
Financial resources
We’ve funded our growth and infrastructure by reinvesting 
our profits. We also have a strong cash position, helping 
us to fund future development and deliver our strategy.
Our customers
	
— £106.8m spent on developing new products and improving our 
existing products.
	
— 67 key locations worldwide providing local customer support and 
technical expertise. We recently opened a new technology centre 
in Bangalore to support our growing customer base in India.
Our shareholders
	
— Total dividends of £55.5m for the year, in line with FY2023.
Our people
	
— £288.5m in salaries, bonuses, social security and pension contributions.
	
— Introduced a new job architecture allowing us to align jobs globally 
based on types of work. This will provide our employees with clearer 
career pathways and improve retention and development.
Our suppliers
	
— £42.5m committed to global capital expenditure projects.
	
— 503 global suppliers for direct goods and services to UK 
manufacturing operations.
Our communities
	
— Ongoing education outreach programme reached around 
12,000 students.
	
— £0.3m in charitable donations during the year.
Our planet
	
— 14% reduction in our market-based statutory greenhouse gas emissions 
compared to FY2023.
	
— Self-generating 9% of our global electricity consumption 
through renewable sources.
V
A
L
U
E 
C
R
E
A
TI
O
N 
A
N
D 
C
O
M
P
E
TI
TI
V
E 
A
D
V
A
N
TA
G
E
Our resources
Delivering value for...
Innovative 
engineering
Using this understanding from 
our customers and world-class 
engineering, we design 
innovative products that solve 
these problems and provide 
precision, productivity 
and practicality.
Routes to market
We have local support and 
technical experts based in 
our main markets, helping 
us to respond quickly to 
our customers’ and 
end users’ needs.
High-quality 
manufacturing 
We then manufacture 
these products ourselves. 
This gives us control 
over their quality, 
cost and delivery.
Customer needs
We work closely with our 
customers to understand 
the challenges they face in 
manufacturing, materials 
analysis and healthcare.
*As at 30 June 2024
10
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Overview of the year 
Effective risk management is fundamental to achieving our 
strategic goals and supports long-term value creation for all 
our stakeholders. Considering both risks and opportunities 
is an essential part of our operations and decision-making. 
This year, we have conducted a robust assessment of the risks 
to our business, including those associated with the worsening 
geopolitical environment, caused by continuing war in Ukraine 
and conflict in the Middle East, and the tightening regulatory 
environment. Additionally, we experienced increasing competition 
in some of our overseas markets, which we continue to monitor. 
Building on our work last year, we have continued to 
implement our people strategy and have seen the results 
in a positive engagement score in our first global employee 
engagement survey. 
Risk movement
Our risk assessment process helps us identify the principal 
risks we face and allows us to monitor the potential impact and 
likelihood of a risk occurring, as these can fluctuate from year 
to year depending on a range of internal and external factors. 
Here, we describe the most significant changes in risks in FY2024.
Increased risks
Economic and political uncertainty: the deteriorating 
geopolitical landscape has increased this risk. We are seeing 
some disruption to trade routes, which could significantly 
influence our strategy and our ability to implement it.
Non-compliance with laws and regulations: the geopolitical 
landscape means that the laws and regulations we must abide 
by as an international business are increasingly complex.
Competitor activity: increasing competitor activity in some 
of our overseas sales markets has the potential to affect 
pricing, margins and volumes. For example, we continue to 
see pricing pressures in China from emerging local competitors. 
To combat this threat, we plan to strengthen our direct sales 
activities in China.
Decreased risks
People: our HR team has continued to implement our people 
strategy as part of its work to achieve our Social goal under our 
new ESG strategy. That includes strengthening our learning and 
development programmes and developing core competencies 
(see pages 42 to 44 for more information). During the year, 
we conducted our first global employee engagement survey, 
with results indicating above-average engagement across the 
Group. While People remains a principal risk, and we continue 
to monitor our performance indicators related to our people, 
we believe that the risk has reduced.
Supply chain dependencies: this risk has further decreased 
this year as the external environment has improved and we 
continue to have effective mitigations in place, such as a risk 
dashboard for our key manufacturing sites and adapting stock 
levels for high-risk items.
Risk environment considerations in FY2024
This year, we continued to focus on risk oversight, identification 
and management, as well as the processes we have in place 
to support risk management. To help refine our risk procedures, 
we have refocused our attention on what we consider to be 
Renishaw’s principal risks, which we set out in the tables on 
pages 15 to 18. We continue to monitor other risks, including 
five that no longer sit within our principal risks but that we have 
reported on in the past. They are: 
	
— Capital and resource allocation;
	
— Loss of manufacturing output;
	
— Product failure;
	
— Climate change; and 
	
— Pensions. 
Meanwhile, we have also paid particular attention to two key 
topics, given the challenges we face in both: cyber security 
and data protection, and our IT transformation programme.
Climate change
The global threat of climate change is rising and we 
acknowledge that, without any mitigating actions, it poses 
a risk to our ability to achieve our strategic growth objectives. 
That’s why we have continued to integrate climate-related risks 
and opportunities into our risk management framework. 
At the same time, our approach to key environmental, social and 
governance (ESG) issues is maturing, with a new ESG strategy 
that includes strategic objectives to help us make progress towards 
our commitment to reaching Net Zero across all Scopes by 2050. 
In developing our ESG strategy, we have found that many of 
our climate-related risks and opportunities are closely related to 
some of our other principal risks. So, this year we have decided 
to remove climate change from our list of principal risks and 
instead have begun incorporating specific elements of this risk 
into the way we assess and manage other principal risks. 
Our Risk Committee and Audit Committee have reviewed 
and approved this revised approach to our principal risks.
See our Climate-related Financial Disclosures on pages 46 to 51 
to understand our materiality methodology for our physical and 
transitional climate-related risks and opportunities.
See our ESG review on pages 37 to 41 for more information 
on our ESG strategy.
Cyber security and data protection
We deploy a comprehensive set of controls to manage various 
risks, including cyber and data security threats. Here are some 
key examples of our approach: 
	
— Building resilience and back-up: we ensure substantial 
resilience and back-up are incorporated into our systems, 
continuously updating them to mitigate current threats and 
align with good industry practice. This includes duplication 
of hardware, dual and diverse connections, and regular back-
up schedules. 
	
— Board and Audit Committee oversight: cyber, security and privacy 
risks are regularly discussed at Board and/or Audit Committee 
meetings to assess the strength of our control environment. 
Risk management
11
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Risk management continued
	
— Physical and logical control measures: we deploy physical 
and logical control measures to protect our information and 
systems, including alerting, monitoring, and automated 
containment and remediation. We also rehearse real-life 
restores of data and services. 
	
— Security awareness and training: we conduct regular security 
awareness training, including phishing simulation exercises. 
We also perform external penetration testing as appropriate, 
and we continue to evaluate additional security solutions. 
These cyber security controls have served us well in FY2024. 
We are committed to maintaining high standards of compliance 
with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other 
data protection laws in the countries where we operate. That’s 
why, this year, we hired a dedicated Privacy Manager who is 
responsible for the Group’s privacy-related policies, procedures, 
training and other compliance requirements, and for championing 
the importance of privacy within the Group. 
Mitigating the risk of IT transformation failure
With further work in the year to configure and implement 
Microsoft Dynamics 365 (D365), we’ve focused on understanding 
whether our expected controls are working as intended, and 
reflecting on whether we need to make any changes. Our main 
types of controls are: 
	
— user acceptance tests, performed ahead of go-live to ensure 
the system is fit for purpose;
	
— automated testing, developed by our software teams in India, 
allowing us to feel confident in adopting new releases 
from Microsoft;
	
— testing interfaces with existing internal and external systems, 
such as:
•	
logistical – shipping company, declarations for export;
•	
data – internal Group-wide reporting to include 
D365 data; and
•	
MRP system;
	
— data migration, reviewing our requirements and checking the 
accuracy and completeness of data before and after the 
switch to D365; and
	
— overall IT transformation management. In managing the risk 
of IT transformation failure, we maintain good engagement 
with Microsoft and our system integrator, work to a clear, 
risk-elimination-based roadmap, and strengthen our 
deployment team with targeted recruitment. We also 
focus on upskilling the team and learning from our first 
deployments to inform future plans. 
Our emerging risks 
We continue to assess our emerging risks. These are uncertain 
in nature and have the potential to develop over time and affect 
our performance. While they may increase the impact and 
likelihood of our principal risks occurring, we do not currently 
expect them to become future principal risks.
As part of our risk management process, we maintain a dynamic 
approach to monitoring emerging risks. This includes regular 
consideration at Risk Committee, Audit Committee and Board 
meetings. For example, we continue to monitor the effect that 
changing work patterns, including hybrid working, have on our 
principal risks (including People, Innovation strategy, and Cyber). 
We continue to look at ways to manage this so that our people 
can collaborate and innovate, and this year we introduced hybrid 
working guidelines in the UK, which set out our expectations of 
our employees. 
We only consider one of the emerging risks that we have identified 
as part of our risk review process as significant – the impact of 
artificial intelligence (AI). The use of AI is developing rapidly 
and its potential impact on businesses could be fundamental. 
We see AI as both an opportunity and a threat for our business. 
For example, controlled use could enhance productivity through 
the automation of certain repetitive tasks. However, its use could 
pose a security threat where technical controls are not sufficient 
or policies not robust enough to promote safe use. Additionally, 
our competitors’ use of AI in design or manufacturing processes 
may give them an advantage. We continue to monitor the use of 
AI and are looking at ways to carefully incorporate its use into our 
own production processes.
12
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

How we govern risk
Our Board retains overall responsibility for risk management 
and is supported by our Audit Committee and Risk Committee. 
At least once a year the Board, with support from the Audit 
Committee, assesses the Company’s principal risks and 
uncertainties and identifies any emerging risks. This includes 
reviewing risks that have the capacity to threaten our business 
model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. The Board 
also sets risk appetite and considers the Company’s principal 
and emerging risks.
Our Audit Committee (comprising independent Non-executive 
Directors) monitors our risk management and internal control 
framework, which is designed to manage rather than eliminate 
the risk of failure in achieving our strategic objectives. The 
Committee is provided with regular reports on financial and 
non-financial risk matters, such as compliance and financial 
controls, as well as receiving internal audit reports and having 
discussions with the external auditor. 
The Audit Committee has helped Renishaw develop its control 
framework over a number of years and reviews its effectiveness 
at least once a year. Where necessary, we adapt the framework 
to ensure it aligns with any changes in our strategic objectives 
or where we see opportunities to improve our approach. 
Our Risk Committee reports into the Executive Committee, with 
the Audit Committee overseeing the discussion of financial risks 
and other matters, including cyber, data protection, compliance 
and climate change. The Risk Committee meets approximately 
five times a year to discuss risk management and internal control 
matters, perform deep dives into some of our principal risks, and 
identify emerging risks. 
During FY2024, the Risk Committee considered improvements 
to our risk management framework and documentation, which 
we will implement during FY2025 and report against in the 
FY2025 Annual Report.
See page 14 for more information on how we identify and 
govern risk.
Our risk review process
Our risk review process is designed to ensure we consider both 
internal risks (those associated with operating our business) 
and external risks (risks associated with the global environment). 
We identify those risks in two ways: 
1. Top-down process
The Chair of the Risk Committee conducts risk interviews with 
senior managers, focusing on the risks that are most significant 
for us. The aim of each interview is to discuss and assess the 
changing risk landscape as it affects the Company, any changes 
within the identified principal risks and associated controls, 
in addition to identifying any emerging risks. The anonymised 
output from these interviews is aggregated to identify key themes 
and trends, as well as any new or emerging risks.
2. Bottom-up process
Regional and product group managers complete risk registers 
for each of their business areas, with a focus on key day-to-day 
operational risks. These results are aggregated to identify trends 
and any new principal or emerging risks. 
The results from both processes are submitted to the Risk 
Committee for discussion. The Risk Committee then assesses 
the proposed principal risks before presenting them to our 
Audit Committee and, ultimately, the Board for approval.
We assign an owner to each principal risk who is responsible 
for the controls to support the effective management of that risk. 
The Risk Committee oversees management of the principal 
risks and invites some of our risk owners to discuss latest 
developments or issues, and to provide updates and assurance 
on risk mitigations and the specific controls in place to manage 
that risk. The Chair of the Risk Committee consults with each 
principal risk owner regarding the wording for the risk table on 
pages 15 to 18.
As well as identifying our principal risks and their anticipated 
impact and likelihood, we conduct a formal risk appetite 
assessment. These results are also shown in the table on pages 
15 to 18. This enables us to assess whether the level of risk we 
are taking is right for our business and to consider opportunities 
to improve our approach, as well as the level and effectiveness 
of our controls.
Priorities for the year ahead
As well as continuing our usual risk identification and monitoring 
activities throughout FY2025, we will:
	
— roll out the improved risk documentation, and gather risk 
assessments from additional parts of the business;
	
— conduct in-depth reviews of principal risks that are not 
within the risk appetite set by the Board; and
	
— continue to monitor and assess emerging risks.
13
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Risk management continued
How we identify and govern risk
 Governance
Top-down
Board
	
— Overarching responsibility for risk management.
	
— Determines risk appetite and identifies principal 
risks and opportunities. 
	
— Evaluates proposed strategies against risk appetite.
	
— Directs external reporting of risk and viability.
	
— Regularly discusses cyber risk and the IT 
transformation failure risk, including regular 
discussions regarding the risks associated with the 
roll out of D365.
Audit Committee 
	
— All members are independent Non-executive Directors.
	
— Assesses the changing status of various principal risks. 
	
— Reviews the effectiveness of our risk management and 
internal control framework.
	
— Helps the Board monitor and assess risk exposure and makes 
recommendations to the Board on proposed principal risks 
and risk appetite.
	
— Approves and considers viability assessment scenarios.
	
— Oversees cyber and IT risk as part of its general risk 
management responsibilities.
	
— Oversees matters discussed by the Risk Committee, including 
reviewing minutes from all Risk Committee meetings.
	
— Oversees key areas, including internal controls, 
risk management, and Internal Audit.
	
— Reviews the risk sections of our external reporting.
Operational risk management
Bottom-up
Risk Committee
	
— Members include representatives from our Executive 
Committee (including our Group Finance Director) 
and senior management.
	
— Manages our risk identification process.
	
— Collects and aggregates risk information.
	
— Helps senior management govern, identify, manage 
and report on principal and emerging risks.
	
— Manages a central repository of risk data from across 
our product groups and regions in terms of their 
respective principal risks.
	
— Responsible for monitoring and reviewing financial 
and non-financial risks.
	
— Receives biannual updates from Responsible 
Renishaw Forum, Speak Up and Internal Audit.
	
— Receives annual updates on business continuity 
and crisis management, and insurance cover.
Operational managers
	
— Carry out effective day-to-day risk management using local 
specialist knowledge.
	
— Design and implement key controls.
	
— Identify risks at an early stage.
	
— Embed risk management and controls.
	
— Monitor risks and controls, mitigating or escalating risks 
as appropriate, and respond appropriately.
	
— Provide updates to the Risk Committee.
Ethics Committee
	
— Comprises four members of our Senior Leadership Team, 
who sit on the Risk Committee as well.
	
— Considers matters that are referred to it, usually by internal 
stakeholders.
	
— Considers particular ethical issues and recommends next steps 
to the Executive Committee. 
	
— Most matters referred to the Ethics Committee involve 
a decision about risk appetite – for example, where a proposed 
course of action is lawful but may involve some reputational risk. 
Independent oversight
Internal Audit
	
— Provides input on the effectiveness of our risk and control framework.
	
— Assesses the effectiveness of controls as part of the Internal 
Audit programme.
	
— Holds scheduled audits of our largest Group companies every 
year, and of other Group companies every two years, and shares 
executive summaries with the Audit and Risk Committees. 
Significant shortcomings are discussed and acted upon promptly. 
The Audit Committee monitors outstanding actions. 
	
— Facilitates process and control enhancements.
	
— Requires all operating companies to complete annual self-
certification questionnaires to confirm they comply with key 
policies and procedures. 
External Audit
	
— The Audit Committee also receives regular reports and updates 
on the work carried out by the external auditor.
Oversight from the Audit Committee
This year, the Audit Committee:
	
— received regular reports from the Risk Committee, specifically 
before the half-year and full-year results where it considered 
our principal risks and approved their ranking; 
	
— monitored management’s programme of work on internal 
control and risk management. The minutes from all Risk 
Committee meetings are shared with the Audit Committee 
to inform their review of the risk and control framework; 
	
— received specific updates on certain risk areas, including 
updates on legal and compliance risk throughout the business, 
which the Committee receives at least twice a year; and
	
— approved improvements to our risk management framework 
and documentation, which we will implement during FY2025.
14
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Principal risks and uncertainties
Appetite
LOW
Minimal risk exposure is considered the safest approach, which may mean 
lower returns.
MEDIUM A balanced approach that carefully considers the risks and rewards.
HIGH
Greater risk tolerance, which may involve maximum risk for maximum return.
Economic and political uncertainty
Appetite
HIGH
Link to strategy
All
Risk owner
Chief Executive 
Risk description
As an international business, we may be affected by global political, economic or regulatory developments. 
This could include a global recession, changes in USA-China trade relations, or the ongoing war in Ukraine and 
conflict in the Middle East. This risk can also drive industry fluctuations.
Potential impact
	
— Loss of financial and physical 
assets in a region.
	
— Supply issues leading to 
failures to meet contractual 
obligations.
	
— Reduced revenue, profit and 
cash generation.
	
— Increased risk to credit, 
liquidity and currency.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Monitoring external economic and commercial environments and 
markets in which we operate, and identifying relevant headwinds.
	
— Maintaining sufficient headroom in our cash balances.
	
— Maintaining appropriate levels of buffer inventory.
	
— Resilient business model and clear strategy, both of which are 
subject to regular scrutiny.
	
— Our internationally diverse business helps to spread risk.
Innovation strategy 
Appetite
HIGH
Link to strategy
All
Risk owners
Directors of 
Industrial 
Metrology, 
Position 
Measurement 
and Additive 
Manufacturing
Risk description
Our success depends on innovation to create new, cutting-edge, sustainable and high-quality products. Failure to 
make these products or protect the intellectual property that underpins them could affect our ability to differentiate 
ourselves from our competitors. There is also a higher risk associated with venturing outside our traditional field of 
expertise, where the science and engineering are less proven.
Potential impact
	
— Failure to lead the market with 
innovative products in our core 
and adjacent sectors.
	
— Loss of market share.
	
— Reduced revenue, profit and 
cash generation.
	
— Failure to recover investment 
in R&D.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Continuing to invest in new product development and 
in the innovation talent we need.
	
— Regular reviews of flagship projects and key technologies with 
a focus on strategic fit and improving time to market.
	
— Designing sustainability into our products. To help, we’re aiming to 
implement a methodology to quantify the sustainability benefits from 
all aspects of our products (see pages 37 and 40 for more information). 
	
— Continuing to drive incremental development and more open customer 
collaboration in the early stages of our R&D projects to ensure our 
innovations are successful in the market. 
Industry fluctuations 
Appetite
HIGH
Link to strategy
G, I
Risk owner
Chief Executive 
Risk description
We’re exposed to the cyclical nature of demand in some of our key markets, including aerospace, automotive, 
semiconductor and consumer electronics, which can affect our profitability. That impact could be more severe 
if downcycles in these key industries coincided. Economic and political uncertainty can also affect these markets 
and our business. 
Potential impact
	
— Reduced revenue, profit and 
cash generation. 
	
— Increased pricing competition.
	
— Loss of market share if unable 
to meet rapid increases 
in demand.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Closely monitoring market developments.
	
— Expanding our product range to serve different industry sectors and markets.
	
— Identifying and meeting the needs of rapidly growing markets, for example 
in robotic automation.
	
— Maintaining a strong balance sheet and strategic inventories with the ability 
to adapt our manufacturing resource levels.
Risk movement
Increased risk
Decreased risk
Stable risk
Link to strategy
 G Growth in existing markets
 I
Increasing technology value
E
Extending into new markets
15
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Risk management continued
Capital products growth (formerly Route to market/customer satisfaction model) 
Appetite
MEDIUM
Link to strategy
I
Risk owner
Chief Executive 
Risk description
Our growth opportunities could be restricted if we fail to implement appropriate and efficient sales and support 
processes relating to systems integration and the sale of capital goods.
Potential impact
	
— Low capital efficiency – 
high people costs and 
low productivity.
	
— High engineering and 
distribution costs.
	
— Adverse impact on customer 
satisfaction levels, revenue 
and profits.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Focusing on key customers to generate repeat business and revenue.
	
— Closely monitoring customer feedback so that we can keep adapting our 
approach according to their needs.
	
— Collaborating with complementary third parties to make our CMM and 
gauging systems compatible with a range of metrology software.
	
— Improving the usability of our own metrology software to streamline 
application development times.
Competitor activity 
Appetite
LOW
Link to strategy
G, I
Risk owner
Chief Executive 
Risk description
Failure to adapt to market and/or technological changes, including those associated with growing demand for 
products with sustainability benefits, could mean losing customers to competitors who have adapted their approach.
Potential impact
	
— Reduced revenue, profit and 
cash generation.
	
— Loss of market share, 
particularly as more customers 
set sustainability goals.
	
— Price erosion.
	
— Loss of reputation as a leader 
in innovation.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Ensuring we are diversified across a range of products, industries 
and geographies.
	
— Closely monitoring market developments, including the emergence 
of new competitors.
	
— Strengthening our local sales and engineering support in China, 
where we are seeing emerging competitors.
	
— Continuing to build our product portfolio through our ongoing commitment 
to R&D (see Note 4 to the Financial statements for details of R&D expenditure).
	
— Continuing to monitor and understand our customers’ sustainability and 
Net Zero goals to deliver products that meet these needs.
Cyber
Appetite
LOW
Link to strategy
All
Risk owner
Group Operations 
Director
Risk description
The number of sophisticated external phishing attacks against our business is rising and we also face the risk 
of internal cyber and data security threats. A successful external or internal attack could severely affect our ability 
to operate, or lead to the loss of personal and commercial data.
Potential impact
	
— Loss of intellectual property 
and/or commercially sensitive 
and/or personal data.
	
— Reduced customer service 
due to disruption or a lack of 
access to our systems.
	
— Financial loss and reputational 
damage.
	
— Adverse impact on business 
decision-making due to lack 
of clear and accurate data, or 
disruption caused by the lack 
of service.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Ensuring we build substantial resilience and back-up into our systems. 
We also continuously update our systems to mitigate current threats 
and align with good industry practice. This includes regular back-up 
schedules and, where possible, duplication of hardware and diverse/
dual connections.
	
— Regularly discussing cyber, security and privacy risks at Board and/or 
Audit Committee meetings, including the strength of our control environment.
	
— Deploying physical and logical control measures to protect our information 
and systems. This includes alerting, monitoring, and automated 
containment and remediation. We regularly rehearse real-life restores 
of data and services.
	
— Conducting regular security awareness training, including phishing 
simulation exercises. We also conduct external penetration testing 
as appropriate, and continue to evaluate additional security solutions.
16
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

People
Appetite
MEDIUM
Link to strategy
All
Risk owner
Group Human 
Resources 
Director
Risk description
Our people are fundamental to the success of our business. Failure to attract, retain and develop key talent at all 
levels of the organisation, as well as ensure we have appropriate succession plans in place, could adversely affect 
our ability to deliver our strategic objectives.
Potential impact
	
— Delays in product delivery 
and ability to deliver 
strategic objectives due 
to loss of expertise and 
specialist talent. 
	
— Failure to develop future 
leaders and insufficient talent 
progression to support 
Renishaw’s future. 
	
— Loss of market share, reduced 
revenue, poor customer 
service and reduced profit.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Continuing to focus on attracting, rewarding and retaining our people 
globally. This includes building a more inclusive working environment 
as part of our new ESG strategy. 
	
— Using the results of our first global employee engagement survey 
in FY2024 to inform the next stages of our people strategy.
	
— Continuing to invest in our education outreach and early careers 
programmes, talent development and succession planning. 
	
— Promoting an inclusive culture by growing our network of employee-led 
resource groups and allyship training to help employees connect with and 
support each other.
	
— Identifying ‘critical’ roles that have a high impact on our business resilience, 
and that require skills and knowledge that are either scarce or hard to 
develop, to help us build continuity plans.
	
— Succession plans in place for management grades and key critical roles 
globally and we intend to use a nine-box approach to talent management 
(see page 43 for more information on this approach).
	
— Promoting our new ESG strategy to help attract and retain a diverse pool 
of talent within the business.
Non-compliance with laws and regulations 
Appetite
LOW
Link to strategy
All
Risk owners
Group General 
Counsel & 
Company 
Secretary and 
Managing Director 
– Renishaw 
Medical
Risk description
As a global business working in some highly regulated sectors, we are subject to a wide variety of laws and 
regulations, including anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, human rights, sanctions and export control, competition 
law, privacy, health and safety, sustainability and climate change, and product safety and medical devices. Failure 
to comply could result in criminal or civil liabilities and/or individual or corporate fines, and could affect our reputation.
Potential impact
	
— Damage to reputation and 
loss of future business.
	
— Potential penalties and fines, 
and cost of investigations.
	
— Management time and 
attention diverted to deal 
with reports of non-
compliance.
	
— Inability to attract and 
retain talent.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Maintaining our Speak Up whistleblowing hotline, available to all employees 
and third parties who provide services for or on behalf of the Group. 
	
— Improving global compliance programmes for all high-risk areas, including 
policies, key controls (including ‘Know Your Customer’ procedures) and 
effective communication, including refreshing our mandatory anti-bribery 
and anti-corruption training modules.
	
— Maintaining our global compliance brand ‘Responsible Renishaw’, raising 
awareness and making it easier for our people to find compliance information.
	
— Launching our new Code of Conduct.
	
— Maintaining our global privacy programme.
	
— Establishing our ESG Steering Committee, which oversees our Sustainability 
team in their responsibility for assessing and complying with ESG regulations.
17
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Risk management continued
IT transformation failure 
Appetite
LOW
Link to strategy
All
Risk owner
Group Operations 
Director
Risk description
We need a modern IT system to support a more integrated global business. However, technical issues associated 
with upgrading our Sage CRM and Sage ERP systems to D365, or poor integration with existing systems, could 
negatively affect our ability to operate. This risk could also result in problems if there are significant delays to the 
programme or an increase in the cost of implementing D365.
Potential impact
	
— Major systems disruption 
causing operational delays.
	
— Delays in processing 
or issuing invoices 
and customer orders, 
or in procuring goods 
and services.
	
— Increased costs, including 
costs to fix technical issues 
and restore or upgrade other 
affected systems.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Maintaining good engagement between ourselves, Microsoft and our 
system integrator.
	
— Working to a clear, risk-elimination-based roadmap with measurable milestones.
	
— Strengthening the deployment team to accelerate roll out, with commitment 
from the Board to invest in targeted recruitment of technical, functional and 
project management roles.
	
— Upskilling the team, transferring knowledge from our system integrator, 
and taking on more configuration and customisation tasks ourselves. 
Risks reduced through learning valuable lessons from our first deployments 
regarding data migration, role permissions, user training and system 
integration. These are informing our future deployment plans.
Supply chain dependencies 
Appetite
LOW
Link to strategy
All
Risk owner
Group 
Manufacturing 
Director
Risk description
We rely on a range of components to make our products, some of them critical to our operations and some that we 
can only source from specific parts of the world. A shortage of critical components, or a change in the geopolitical 
landscape or availability of single-sourced components, could make us vulnerable to supply interruptions.
Potential impact
	
— Inability to fulfil customer 
orders, leading to 
a reduction in revenue 
and profits, and damage 
to reputation.
	
— Failure to meet contractual 
requirements.
	
— Increased cost of alternative 
sourcing or redesign.
	
— Loss of market share.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Maintaining a risk dashboard for our key manufacturing sites, to help us 
prioritise and determine stock levels.
	
— Adapting stock levels for high-risk items, to account for supply lead times and 
time to redesign in the event of loss of supply. We seek cost-effective alternative 
sources of supply (including in-house manufacturing), to reduce dependency 
on single-source suppliers, with continued focus on key components.
	
— Ongoing collaboration with product groups to review risks and, where 
appropriate, review and update specifications to facilitate alternative sourcing 
or redesign.
	
— Assessing our supply chain for potential supply interruptions due to climate 
change risks or geopolitical factors.
Exchange rate fluctuations

Appetite
MEDIUM
Link to strategy
G, I
Risk owner
Group Finance 
Director
Risk description
We report our results and pay dividends in Sterling and, with more than 90% of our revenue generated outside the 
UK, we’re exposed to volatility in exchange rates that could have a significant impact on our results. Movements of 
Sterling against our major trading currencies cause cash flow, currency translation, and intercompany balance 
translation risks.
Potential impact
	
— Significant variations 
in profit.
	
— Reduced cash generation.
	
— Increased competition on 
product prices.
	
— Increased costs.
What we are doing to manage this risk
	
— Maintaining rolling forward contracts for cash-flow hedges in accordance with 
Board-approved policy, and one-month forward contracts to manage risks on 
intercompany balances.
	
— Tracking overseas net assets value compared to the market capitalisation.
	
— Obtaining input from external sources, including our banks.
18
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

The Directors have assessed our prospects and viability 
in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code. 
This assessment took account of our current position and 
principal risks, and the details of the assessment and the 
conclusion reached are set out as follows.
Context
In making the assessment, the Directors considered the 
following factors that they felt provided important context:
Financial resources – we have significant financial resources, 
with cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits at the 
start of the viability assessment period of £217.8m. We have 
a strong history of creating cash for the business. The only 
external source of finance included in the viability assessment 
is financing for a property in Japan (see Note 20 on page 138), 
the repayments for which are not material. We have no 
debt covenants.
Business model and markets – our business model includes 
designing and manufacturing products ourselves, giving us 
the flexibility to respond to customers’ needs and control over 
where we direct our manufacturing resources. We can also 
direct our sales and marketing resources where needed, 
should market trends and conditions change. In addition, 
we are also diversified over a range of markets, as explained 
on pages 29 to 34.
Business planning – our business planning process uses 
a top-down approach (the ‘corporate view’), as well as detailed 
forecasts from both our product groups and our sales regions, 
to ensure we consider a range of perspectives. We also use 
external sources of information, such as market trends and 
economic growth rates, in our business planning process.
Risk management – we have a robust risk assessment and 
management process, as set out on pages 11 to 14. As we 
explain in the scenarios section below, the crystallisation of our 
principal risks has been considered in the viability assessment.
Assessment period
The Directors used a three-year period, to the end of September 
2027, to make their viability assessment. While a five-year 
business plan has been prepared, the Directors feel that a 
three-year period is more suitable for this assessment and better 
reflects our business model – where we typically have short-term 
contracts with customers and a short order book, and can adapt 
our manufacturing to meet demand in months rather than years.
Principal risks
The Directors reviewed our principal risks and considered which 
could have a significant effect on the Group’s financial position, 
business model and/or future performance if they were to 
crystallise within the period to September 2027. Financial models, 
described below, were used to assess the potential impact. 
Financial modelling 
Each of our scenarios used the same starting point, being the 
pessimistic version of our five-year business plan (with the 
revenue in this pessimistic forecast also referred to as the 
‘highly probable’ revenue forecast for hedge accounting). 
For context, revenue in the first year of this pessimistic base 
scenario is similar to FY2024 revenue of £691.3m, while costs 
and other cash outflows still reflect ambitious growth plans.
The three scenarios then took this same starting point and 
revised the forecasts to reflect:
Scenario
Summary
1
A significant reduction in revenue, incorporating:
	
— a worsening of the global economy;
	
— a disruptive event that causes both a short-term 
Group-wide disruption of trade and a sustained 
significant loss of revenue from key customers 
after the event;
	
— increasing competition in China from emerging 
local competitors
	
— a strengthening of Sterling;
	
— a delay in launching key new products; and
	
— no revenue growth from emerging capital equipment.
2
A significant increase in costs, incorporating:
	
— a significant fine or penalty;
	
— a sustained increase in inflation;
	
— additional professional fees;
	
— reduced operating profit margins on the sale of 
capital equipment; and
	
— additional costs to respond to a one-off 
disruptive event.
3
A combined reduction in profitability, incorporating:
	
— a reduction in revenue less significant than scenario 
one and an increase in costs less significant than 
scenario two.
We incorporated appropriate, realistic mitigating actions into 
each scenario, such as reducing capital expenditure, bonuses 
and dividends relative to the revised financial performance and 
position in these scenarios.
This modelling showed that cash and cash equivalents balances 
remained positive in all three scenarios and exceeded £87m 
at the end of the assessment period (30 September 2027) 
in each scenario.
We also performed a ‘reverse stress test’, identifying the 
reduction in profit, after mitigating actions, needed to exhaust 
cash in the assessment period. This identified a trading level 
so low that the Directors felt that the events that could trigger 
this would be highly unlikely. The Directors also concluded that 
a one-off cash outflow that would exhaust the Group’s cash 
and cash equivalents in the assessment period was also 
highly unlikely.
Outcomes, mitigating actions and upsides
The financial modelling demonstrated that should the Group 
experience ‘severe but plausible’ conditions in the period to 
September 2027, positive cash and cash equivalents and bank 
deposit balances can be maintained throughout. As a vertically 
integrated business that typically funds future growth through 
cash reserves, we have a good degree of control on how we use 
cash, and a range of mitigating actions we can take to respond 
to challenging conditions.
Conclusion
Based on this assessment, incorporating a review of the current 
position, the scenarios, and our principal risks and mitigation, 
the Directors have a reasonable expectation that we will be able 
to continue operating and meet our liabilities as they fall due over 
the period to 30 September 2027.
Viability statement
19
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Through-cycle revenue growth %
-4
-2
0%
2
4
6
8
12
10
-2.4
-1.5
9.5
3.8
2.4
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
Our ambition is to achieve sustainable long-term revenue growth 
through cycles in our key markets, driving shareholder returns. 
Our target is high single-digit average growth.
How we measure this
Compound annual revenue growth rate over a rolling five-
year period.
How we performed
Five-year average revenue growth is currently 3.8%, with both 
business segments having delivered through-cycle revenue 
growth. The cyclical nature of our markets means that our five-year 
average growth can be quite volatile and we are targeting 
improvements in this metric as key markets recover. Our long-term 
value creation strategy (pages 7 to 9) explains how we aim to meet 
our long-term growth ambition.
 Through-cycle growth rate 	
 Target range
Revenue £m
 691.3
 688.6
 671.1
 565.6
 510.2
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
Revenue growth helps us assess the relevance of our products 
for solving customer problems and the growth in our market share. 
It also helps increase profits, which we reinvest in the business 
to deliver long-term growth and use to pay dividends to our 
shareholders.
How we measure this
Revenue generated from operations, at actual rates of exchange.
How we performed
Revenue grew to £691.3m, an increase of 0.4% from FY2023. 
Growth was 3.7% at constant currency*. We saw good growth in 
sales of AM machines, and CMM and gauging systems, offset by 
weaker demand for position encoders and calibration systems 
from the semiconductor manufacturing sector.
Our key performance indicators
We use financial and non-financial key performance indicators (KPIs) 
to measure progress against our strategy.
This year, to reflect our focus on long-term value creation, we report four 
additional key performance indicators (KPIs) – Through-cycle revenue 
growth, Adjusted* operating profit margin, Return* on invested capital and 
Adjusted* cashflow conversion from operating activities. The rationale for 
these new metrics is included in the respective charts below. 
We have also introduced targets for these new metrics and we are showing 
past performance against these new targets, even though they were not 
being measured at that time. 
We now only report on one profit before tax KPI, focusing on Adjusted* 
profit before tax, as this is the measure that the Board reviews throughout 
the year to understand the underlying trading performance of the business. 
*Note 29, Alternative performance measures, defines how each of these measures is calculated.
20
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Adjusted cash flow conversion* from operating activities %
0%
20
40
60
80
120
115
66
70
26
103
100
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
This ratio assesses our efficiency in converting our operating 
profit before tax into cash and cash equivalents. Our target is 
to exceed 70%.
How we measure this
Adjusted cash flow from operating activities as a percentage 
of Adjusted operating profit. These are defined in note 29 on 
page 152.
How we performed
This metric has improved significantly this year, rising from 26% 
in FY2023 to 70% in FY2024. This improvement has been driven 
by lower working capital, most notably a £23.8m reduction in 
inventories this year, in contrast to a £23.3m increase last year, 
and also by lower capital expenditure this year.
 Adjusted cash flow conversion from operating activities ratio
 Target range
Return on invested capital %
0%
5
10
15
20
30
6.5
17.5
23.5
16.1
12.3
25
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
Return on invested capital (ROIC) assesses our efficiency in 
allocating capital to profitable investments. Our target is to 
exceed 15%.
How we measure this
Adjusted profit after tax before bank interest receivable, 
as a percentage of invested capital. ROIC is defined in note 29 
on page 152.
How we performed
This metric has reduced to 12.3% this year, in line with lower 
pre-tax profit, a higher tax rate and an increase in our non-current 
asset base. Over the last two years, we have invested significant 
capital in our manufacturing facilities to enable us to pursue future 
growth opportunities.
 Return on invested capital	
 Target range
Adjusted profit before tax £m
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
 122.6
 141.0
 163.7
 119.7
 48.6
Why we measure this
Profit shows how our strategy delivers value for stakeholders. 
Adjusted profit before tax is the measure that the Board reviews 
throughout the year to understand the underlying trading 
performance of the business.
How we measure this
Adjusted profit before tax is defined in note 29 on page 152.
How we performed
As a result of increased costs and adverse currency impact in 
a year of marginal revenue growth, Adjusted profit before tax has 
decreased by 13%. Labour, marketing expenses and maintenance 
contracts have been the main drivers behind the higher costs.
Adjusted operating profit margin %
0%
5
10
15
20
30
25
10.1
21.0
24.1
18.9
15.7
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
Profitability demonstrates the efficiency of our strategy in delivering 
value for shareholders. Our target is to exceed 20%.
How we measure this
Adjusted* operating profit (see note 29 on page 152), expressed 
as a percentage of revenue.
How we performed
This metric has reduced this year, with operating costs increasing 
at a greater rate than revenue growth. We have continued to invest 
in our people to attract and retain employees to drive our future 
growth. We are focusing on productivity to control future cost 
growth, aiming to drive this metric back above our target.
 Adjusted operating profit margin	
 Target range
21
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Our key performance indicators (KPIs) continued
Global voluntary employee turnover %
 6.2
 6.8
 10.7
 8.0
 7.0
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
The success of our strategies relies on our people feeling that 
Renishaw is a great place to work, grow and contribute.
How we measure this
The number of voluntary leavers (excluding voluntary redundancy 
and mutually agreed severance, if applicable) in the year, 
as a percentage of our average total headcount during the year.
How we performed
After investing heavily in pay and reward over the last two years, 
our turnover rate has improved and stabilised at a lower level. 
We continue to engage in a range of activities to promote employee 
engagement. More information can be found on page 23.
Total engineering costs, including R&D £m
 106.8
 98.1
 100.6
 90.2
 85.8
 78.6
 76.6
 72.0
 82.4
 87.3
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
Investing in engineering is fundamental to our growth, helping 
us to develop innovative new products and evolve our existing 
products to maintain their competitiveness.
How we measure this
Annual expenditure on engineering, including R&D that has been 
capitalised in the year, net of amortisation on capitalised R&D.
How we performed
Gross engineering expenditure increased by 6% to £106.8m. 
This increase mostly reflects higher pay, helping us to retain and 
develop engineers to develop new technologies for future growth.
 Included in Consolidated income statement	
 Gross expenditure 
Dividend per share in respect of the year pence
 76.2
 76.2
 72.6
 66.0
0.0
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
To track the underlying performance of the business and measure 
how profit growth translates into shareholder returns.
How we measure this
Interim dividend paid in the year, plus the proposed final dividend.
How we performed
We paid an interim dividend of 16.8 pence per share in FY2024 
and the Directors propose a final dividend of 59.4 pence per 
share. This would bring the overall dividend per share to 
76.2 pence, equal to the total dividend for FY2023.
Despite lower profit this year, the Directors have considered the 
Company’s future growth plans and strong cash reserves, and 
so have proposed to maintain the dividend per share this year.
Statutory GHG emissions tCO2e per £m revenue
 6.4
 7.5
 9.9
 11.9
 13.3
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
Why we measure this
This helps us ensure that we are doing business responsibly and 
tracks our progress against our Net Zero targets.
How we measure this
Tonnes of Scope 1 and 2 (‘Statutory’) carbon dioxide equivalent 
(CO2e) emissions from our operations, per £m of revenue, using 
the market-based method. See How we calculate our data on 
page 41.
How we performed
Our climate transition plans continue to reduce our greenhouse 
gas (GHG) emissions per £m. Progress this year includes: 99% of 
our purchased electricity is now from certified renewable sources, 
we have increased solar electricity self-generation at several buildings, 
and we continue to convert our vehicle fleet to low-carbon fuels.
22
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

The success of our business relies on good 
relationships with our stakeholders. We rely on 
different groups to help us run our business and 
achieve our strategic goals. We recognise that our 
operations can have a significant impact – both 
positive and negative – on many of them. It’s essential, 
therefore, that we consider their views when making 
business decisions. 
Over the following pages, we summarise our 
stakeholder groups and provide a snapshot of how 
we engage with them, as well as actions we’ve taken 
this year in response to what they’ve told us. Notable 
actions include a focus on our channel partner 
programme (see Our customers on page 24 for more 
information) and evolving the way we engage with our 
investor community. Our aim is to help both groups 
better understand the story of our business and how 
our products create value. We also launched our first 
global employee engagement survey this year.
For more information on how we considered our 
stakeholders in some of our principal decisions 
this year, see our Section 172 statement on 
pages 64 to 66.
Our employees
We aim to attract and retain people with the right skills 
to help us succeed, including designing and making the 
products our customers need. And since diversity of 
thought is one of the best ways of encouraging innovation 
and creativity, we also want to create an inclusive working 
culture where people feel able to share their views and 
achieve their full potential.
How we engage with our employees
We want our people to tell us what we’re doing well and 
where we can improve, and we are committed to ensuring 
we have the channels in place to help them do that. These 
channels also enable us to communicate the steps we’re 
taking to respond to their feedback and provide greater 
clarity about our strategic objectives. They include:
	
— employee briefing sessions and equality, diversity 
and inclusion (EDI) forums; 
	
— a new global employee engagement survey, 
launched in April 2024 in 23 languages. In all, 63% 
of people responded. We also run Q&As, townhalls 
and pulse surveys; 
	
— regular engagement between employees and their 
managers, such as discussions about performance, 
supporting career development and identifying 
opportunities for coaching;
	
— multiple meetings between our Board member and 
employee engagement ambassador, Catherine Glickman, 
and employees at different sites around the UK. This 
included meeting Early Careers graduates and leaders 
of our manufacturing division;
	
— our growing network of UK employee resource groups, 
which provide a platform for employees to give feedback 
to the business on a range of topics; 
	
— internal social media and video channels and roadshows; 
	
— Works Forums consultations for UK sites, with 
representation from different business areas; and 
	
— one-to-one engagement between Board members 
and some of our senior leaders to help the Board 
stay connected with employee views and support 
ongoing work to develop clear career paths and 
succession planning.
Outcomes from the year 
	
— Achieved an engagement score of 74% in our first global 
employee survey and scored well in areas like wellbeing 
and intent to stay. Our employees also told us we have 
room to improve in areas like inclusion, teamwork and 
collaboration, and strategy. We’ll use the results of this 
survey to inform our people strategy and internal 
communications in the coming year. 
	
— Continued to build a more inclusive environment with our 
new employee resource groups organising and hosting 
a growing number of activities, including new groups for 
neurodiverse and disabled colleagues. 
	
— Ran our second annual values competition. We received 
37 entries from around the world, with our equality, 
diversity and inclusion group and Early Careers team 
among the winners. 
Learn more about our first global employee survey and the 
steps we’re already taking to address areas for improvement 
on pages 42 to 44.
How we engage with stakeholders
23
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
How we engage with stakeholders continued
Our shareholders 
Our shareholders are the owners of our business. 
We recognise the trust they place in us and in return we 
aim to provide sustainable, long-term growth. It is essential, 
therefore, that our Board and Senior Leadership Team 
understand and consider the views of our shareholders 
when making key strategic decisions. 
How we engage with our shareholders
We are strengthening the way we engage with our 
shareholders, and are committed to providing opportunities 
for them to share their feedback. Some of the key events 
in our Investor Relations calendar include:
	
— our annual Capital Markets Day, held this year 
in June 2024 and attended by our Directors; 
	
— new one-to-one meetings with key shareholders and 
potential investors; and 
	
— our biannual webcast presentations to discuss our 
interim and annual results, including Q&A sessions 
for participants.
Outcomes from the year 
	
— Held formal and informal conversations with institutional 
investors to discuss the changes to our Board, 
including Sir David McMurtry’s decision to step down 
as Executive Chairman and our plans to appoint a new 
independent Non-executive Chair.
	
— Following feedback from investors, our Board approved 
modifications to our Investor Relations Policy to help 
us evolve our shareholder engagement. Once again, 
Sir David Grant, then our Senior Independent Director, 
invited our largest institutional investors who voted 
against re-electing our founders to the Board at our 
2023 AGM to discuss their concerns. In all, five 
institutional investors met with Sir David and Karen 
Atterbury, our Interim Company Secretary, in March 
and April 2024. The meetings focused on a range 
of topics, including the absence of a relationship 
agreement between the founders and the Company 
(see more information on page 60), governance, 
business and strategy, and our approach to ESG. 
Key issues raised related to Board composition, 
diversity and succession planning. The Board and 
relevant Committees discussed each key theme as 
appropriate. The Board has made progress in these 
areas over the past few years, as explained in this 
year’s ESG review on pages 35 to 45 and the relevant 
sections of the Governance report on pages 70 to 75. 
However, the Board recognises that there is more work 
to do, specifically in achieving its diversity objectives. 
	
— Appointed Peel Hunt as our new joint corporate 
broker to work alongside our existing corporate broker, 
UBS, to help us strengthen our links and share our 
investment case with the wider investment community. 
Learn more about how we engaged with shareholders 
during the year on pages 60 to 61.
Our customers
We work closely with our customers to understand their 
production processes and the challenges they face so 
that we can make the precise, productive and practical 
products they need. The fact that many customers have 
been with us for decades is testament to our team’s 
expertise and ability to speak their language. 
How we engage with our customers
We have three different types of customers – machine 
builders who fit our products, end users who buy from 
us directly, and distributors/channel partners who sell 
our products. We carefully select the latter based on 
their sector-specific experience. While we tailor our 
engagement to suit the specific needs of each 
customer group, our approach also includes:
	
— our channel partner programmes in India and the 
EMEA sales region. The programmes aim to make 
it easier for end users to access our products and to 
strengthen our customer service and product support. 
Our EMEA programme has three different levels of 
commercial partnership and a dedicated partner portal 
that includes up-to-date technical, marketing and sales 
support materials; 
	
— our global technology centres, which enable us to 
directly support customers where they are based;
	
— customer visits to our UK manufacturing facilities 
to show how we use our own technologies to support 
efficient, high-quality production processes; and 
	
— gathering feedback via face-to-face and digital 
sessions, and events. 
Outcomes from the year 
	
— Continued growing our channel partner programmes, 
including adding our industrial automation product 
line to the programme and announcing our first official 
channel partner for these products. In response to 
feedback from our EMEA Sales Channel Partners 
asking for greater opportunities for mutual learning, 
we held our first dedicated conference at our UK 
headquarters, attended by 60 partners from 
16 countries. 
	
— Attended EMO Hannover, the largest international 
metalworking trade show, in September 2023, where 
our product experts engaged with exhibiting machine 
builders and visitors from 130 countries. 
	
— Following requests to see how we use our own 
products to be more efficient, we hosted customers 
from Finland, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, 
Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the 
USA at our UK manufacturing facilities. 
Learn more about how we are working with customers to 
help them meet their sustainability goals on page 40.
24
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Our suppliers
We aim to build effective long-term relationships with 
our suppliers to access the goods and services we 
need to manufacture our products (direct suppliers), 
run our operations (indirect suppliers) and support new 
product development. 
How we engage with our suppliers
While we buy most of our materials in the UK, we have 
teams in the countries where our suppliers are based so we 
can regularly engage with them in their local time zone and 
language. And because we rely on tens of thousands of 
different raw materials and components from thousands 
of suppliers, we can’t take a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. 
Instead, we prioritise our engagement based on certain 
criteria, including how much we spend with a supplier, their 
risk profile and quality. We have also begun work to map 
suppliers’ credentials against our sustainability and 
compliance requirements. We focus the majority of our 
day-to-day relationship management on around 250 key 
suppliers. Some of the ways that we engage include:
	
— self-assessments for all new direct – and selected 
indirect – suppliers; 
	
— regular communication via our procurement and 
engineering teams to ensure consistent, timely supply 
of quality goods and services. When a problem 
occurs, we work with a supplier to ensure they have 
improvement programmes and training in place; 
	
— compliance audit and risk management policies 
and processes, including our new Code of Conduct 
(see page 45 for more information on our Code); 
	
— campaigns about compliance topics, such as 
human rights, health and safety, conflict minerals 
and sanctions; and
	
— frequent discussions with suppliers about the 
challenges and supply chain risks they face. Our Board 
also receives updates on significant matters that could 
affect our supply chain.
Outcomes from the year 
	
— Invested in a new supplier relationship management 
platform to help monitor performance, identify high-risk 
suppliers against our key criteria, and work 
collaboratively on sustainability challenges. 
	
— Introduced new training to help our buyers embed 
sustainability into their everyday thinking. To date, 
90% of our buyers have completed the training. 
	
— Engaged collaboratively with a select group of suppliers 
on the topic of sustainability, with the aim of working with 
them to reduce carbon emissions associated with the 
manufacture and supply of goods and services we use. 
This was in response to our materiality assessment 
(see page 35) and feedback from some suppliers, 
particularly small and medium-sized businesses, who 
are keen to learn more and make progress. The sessions 
looked at key sustainability issues, our expectations of 
suppliers, and the actions they’re taking to address their 
Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. Initial feedback has 
been positive and we are now reviewing ways to roll out 
the programme to more suppliers.
Learn more about how we are working with suppliers to 
create a more sustainable value chain on page 40.
Our communities
We are committed to conducting business in a socially 
responsible way and aim to be open, honest and 
consistent in our approach to community relationships. 
Meanwhile, our education outreach programme supports 
our broader work to build a pipeline of talent that will 
support Renishaw’s future success. 
How we engage with our communities
While each country tailors its approach to community 
engagement to suit the local area’s culture and needs, 
we focus our efforts on three key areas:
	
— delivering science, technology, engineering and 
mathematics (STEM) education through our global 
education outreach programme; 
	
— participating in local community and business initiatives; 
and 
	
— financial and communications support for charities and 
not-for-profit organisations. 
Outcomes from the year 
	
— Continued to deliver our education outreach 
programme by: 
•	 participating in more than 170 STEM events in 
Wales and Gloucestershire, engaging with around 
12,000 students. We also opened the Renishaw 
Room at the Bristol Beacon concert hall to support 
music education in south west UK; and
•	 engaging with diverse student groups. Around 25% 
of our engagements were with all-female groups, 
SEND (special educational needs and disabilities) 
schools and schools from socio-economically 
deprived areas.
	
— Participated in a range of community and business 
initiatives, including: 
•	 sponsoring the second Slovenia Conference on 
Chips and Semiconductors in January 2024 to 
support the EU semiconductor community and 
share our own knowledge in chip development; 
•	 supporting UK Government campaigns on 
violence against women and girls, and blood 
and organ donation;
•	 sponsoring music, arts and professional sports 
organisations in key UK locations; 
•	 as part of Black History Month, our sites across 
the UK celebrated influential Black engineers; and
•	 joining the new Gloucestershire LGBTQ+ Inclusion 
and Diversity for Employers (GLIDE) consortium.
	
— Through our technical partnerships, provided British 
Cycling and INEOS Britannia with expertise and 
components for a new track bike for the Paris Olympics 
and a race boat for the 37th Americas Cup.
	
— Donated £0.3m to more than 280 charitable and 
not-for-profit organisations. This included £116,000 
from our India charities committee to support local 
organisations, and £20,000 related to our global 
values competition. We also promoted fundraisers and 
requests for volunteers, including trustees, from several 
UK charities via our internal communication channels. 
Learn more about how our STEM outreach programme 
supports our talent pipeline on page 42.
25
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Following a strong final quarter, we have achieved record 
revenue for the year of £691.3m (FY2023: £688.6m). We have 
continued to invest in our people, increasing employee pay, 
which together with adverse currency effects, is the main reason 
for the reduction in Adjusted* profit before tax to £122.6m 
(FY2023: £141.0m).
We have maintained our strong financial position, with cash 
and cash equivalents and bank deposit balances at the 
year end of £217.8m (30 June 2023: £206.4m), and net current 
assets of £485.7m (30 June 2023: £470.8m). Our inventory 
holding has been a focus area in working capital this year, 
which we reduced by £23.8m over the year, as explained in 
more detail below.
We’ve continued to invest in capital expenditure that supports 
our long-term growth plans, with additions to property, plant and 
equipment this year of £65.2m (FY2023: £73.8m), and continued 
to apply our treasury strategy to mitigate near-term market risk.
Revenue 
As Will has explained in the Chief Executive’s review, we achieved 
0.4% growth in our revenue to £691.3m (FY2023: £688.6m). 
Despite challenging market conditions at the beginning of 
the year, we have seen recovering demand from our key 
semiconductor market towards the end of the year, and 
good growth in our systems sales.
This year’s gross margin (excluding engineering costs), 
as a percentage of revenue, was 61%, compared with 64% 
last year. This change is mostly due to the adverse impact of 
currency on revenue, combined with higher labour pay rates. 
We have made targeted price rises, although this has been 
offset by pricing pressures, particularly in the APAC region.
Supporting our strategy of delivering growth by developing 
innovative and patented products, we invested £71.1m in research 
and development expenditure, compared with £72.5m last year 
(see Note 4 to the Financial statements). We also incurred £35.7m 
(FY2023: £28.1m) of other engineering expenditure, to support 
existing products and technologies. Net engineering spend 
also includes a £2.7m reduction in capitalised development 
expenditure, net of amortisation and impairments, as explained 
in Note 12. This is partly offset by a £1.1m year-on-year increase 
in the R&D tax credit, totalling £7.7m for FY2024, which is 
primarily as a result of the rate applicable to qualifying spend 
increasing from 13% to 20% in April 2023.
In distribution and administrative expenses, we have also spent 
an additional £4.7m in consultancy and software this year, 
notably on our new global ERP system and an upgraded 
e-commerce platform, as part of our initiative to improve 
productivity across the business. We deployed the first instance 
of the new ERP system during the year and have developed 
in-house expertise to reduce third-party costs as we deploy 
this globally over the next few years.
Profit and tax
As a result of the increased costs and impact of currency in 
a year of marginal revenue growth, Adjusted* operating profit was 
16.7% lower this year at £108.7m (FY2023: £130.4m). At constant 
exchange rates*, Adjusted operating profit would have been 
8.8% lower than the previous year.
Adjusted* operating profit in our Manufacturing technologies 
segment was £103.2m, compared with £125.5m last year. In our 
Analytical instruments and medical devices segment, Adjusted* 
operating profit was £5.5m, compared with £4.9m last year. 
Financial income for the year was £12.3m, compared with £9.7m 
last year, and includes a £2.8m increase in interest on bank 
deposits mainly due to higher interest rates. 
Adjusted profit before tax was £122.6m, compared with £141.0m 
in FY2023. Statutory profit before tax was also £122.6m, compared 
with £145.1m in the previous year. 
Certain infrequent events can sometimes affect our financial 
statements, prepared according to applicable International 
Financial Reporting Standards. We exclude these events from 
adjusted profit and earnings measures to give the Board and 
other stakeholders another useful metric to understand and 
compare our underlying performance. This year, there were no 
items excluded from Adjusted profit before tax, while additional 
items excluded in the previous year are detailed in Note 29 on 
pages 152 to 154. 
The FY2024 effective tax rate has increased to 21.0% (FY2023: 
20.0%) mostly as a result of an increase in the effective UK tax 
rate from 20.5% to 25.0%. Note 7 provides further analysis of the 
effective tax rate.
Financial review
At constant exchange rates*, revenue would have been 
3.7% higher than the previous year. This is mostly as a result 
of an appreciation of GBP relative to USD, from an average of 
1.21 in FY2023 to 1.26 in FY2024. The effect of currency has 
been partly mitigated by our treasury strategy. Without our 
forward cash flow hedging contracts, revenue would have 
reduced by 0.7% year-on-year.
Operating costs
As noted last year, our labour costs are our largest cost 
and this year we’ve focused on striking the right balance of 
investing in our people to retain, reward and motivate while 
seeking sustainable profit growth. Salary increases, in addition 
to an increase in average headcount of 77, are the main drivers 
for total labour costs (excluding bonuses) increasing by 4% 
to £279.5m from £268.2m last year. This also includes 
severance costs of £2.1m, which mostly related to a mutually 
agreed severance scheme in the UK, and a £4.6m currency 
translation benefit. 
Region
FY2024 
revenue at 
actual 
exchange 
rates
£m
FY2023 
revenue at
actual 
exchange 
rates
£m
Actual FX 
variance
%
Constant FX
variance
%
APAC
318.8
310.6
+3
+8
EMEA
208.0
216.5
-4
-1
Americas
164.4
161.5
+2
+2
Total Group revenue
691.3
688.6
0
+4
26
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Consolidated balance sheet
We have invested £65.2m (FY2023: £73.8m) in capital 
expenditure, which mostly relates to new production plant and 
equipment, and the expansion of our Miskin production facility 
in Wales, UK. The Miskin project will ultimately increase our 
global manufacturing floorspace by 50%, with the first of the two 
new halls becoming operational during the year. I would like to 
thank the project team who were responsible for delivering the 
first phase of this project on time and within budget. We have 
also purchased a distribution facility in the United Arab Emirates 
and completed the construction of a distribution facility in Brazil.
As I mentioned earlier, we’ve focused this year on reducing our 
inventory holding. Whilst we continue to recognise the importance 
to our current and potential customers of holding sufficient 
finished products to meet their needs, we have reduced both 
finished good and component inventories following the easing 
of supply chain challenges experienced in recent years. This has 
meant we’ve reduced inventory from £185.8m at the start of the 
year to £161.9m.
Trade receivables increased from £123.4m to £134.1m due to 
increased trading in the fourth quarter of FY2024 relative to the 
previous year. With good credit management practices across 
the Group, debtor days remained constant year-on-year at 
63 days. We continue to experience low levels of defaults, 
and hold a provision for expected credit losses at 0.5% of 
trade receivables (FY2023: 0.4%).
Total equity at the end of the year was £902.8m, compared with 
£896.7m at 30 June 2023. This is primarily a result of profit for 
the year of £96.9m, less dividends paid of £55.4m and the 
remeasurement of defined benefit (DB) pension scheme 
liabilities of £36.3m.
Cash flow and liquidity
We continue to have a strong liquidity position, with cash and 
cash equivalents and bank deposit balances at 30 June 2024 
of £217.8m (30 June 2023: £206.4m). This is a result of our 
cash flows from operating activities of £124.1m, partly offset 
by our previously noted capital investments and dividends 
paid of £55.4m.
We have introduced a new key performance indicator (KPI) 
this year relating to cash flow. Adjusted cash flow conversion* 
from operating activities assesses our efficiency at converting 
operating profit into cash. We achieved our target of 70% this 
year, which was a significant improvement from the previous 
year (FY2023: 26%). See page 21 for more details.
Pensions
At the end of the year, our defined benefit pension schemes 
showed a net surplus of £10.8m, compared with £57.4m at 
30 June 2023.
During the year, the Trustee of the UK defined benefit pension 
scheme (‘UK scheme’) undertook a buy-in and insured around 
99% of the UK scheme’s liabilities by purchasing an insurance 
policy. This contract was effective from 19 October 2023 and 
the value of the contract is recognised as a UK scheme asset. 
For a buy-in insurance contract such as this, where the income 
received from the policy matches exactly the benefit payments 
due to the members it is covering, the value attributable to the 
contract recognised as an asset is the equivalent IAS 19 value 
of the corresponding liabilities. 
The IAS 19 liabilities in respect of the buy-in policy were 
lower than the transaction price of the insurance contract. 
Consequently, the value attributable to the insurance 
contract reduced from the actual price paid, and the resulting 
remeasurement loss of £31.9m was recognised in the 
remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme liabilities 
element in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive 
Income and Expense. See Note 23 for further detail.
£
150.0
140.0
130.0
110.0
120.0
100.0
Change in 
revenue less 
change in 
production 
costs
FY2023
FY2024
Engineering 
costs
Distribution 
costs
Administration 
expenses
Financial 
income and 
expenses
Share of 
profits of joint 
ventures
Adjusted profit before tax bridge
141.0
-11.4
-7.9
-2.2
-0.2
2.2
1.1
122.6
Increase
Decrease
Total
27
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Financial review continued
Treasury strategy
Our treasury policies are designed to manage the financial 
risks that arise from operating in multiple foreign currencies. 
The majority of sales are made in these currencies, while 
most manufacturing and engineering is carried out in the UK, 
Ireland and India.
We use forward exchange contracts to hedge both a proportion 
of anticipated foreign currency cash inflows and the translation 
of foreign currency-denominated intercompany balances. 
There are forward contracts in place to hedge against our Euro, 
US Dollar and Japanese Yen cash inflows over a two-year 
forward period, where our forward rate cap policy allows, and 
to offset movements on Renishaw plc’s Euro, US Dollar and 
Japanese Yen intercompany balances. We do not speculate 
with derivative financial instruments.
Our treasury policies are also designed to maximise interest 
income on our cash and bank deposits and to ensure that 
appropriate funding arrangements are available for each 
of our companies.
Sustainability
We continue to progress with our transition to Net Zero, 
as outlined on pages 37 to 41. Our five-year financial plan 
includes estimates of the capital expenditure needed to deliver 
this plan, and at this stage we have not identified a material 
effect of other climate-related matters on our financial statements. 
Capital allocation strategy
Our Board regularly reviews the capital requirements of the 
Group, to maintain a strong financial position to protect the 
business and provide flexibility to fund future growth. We’ve 
consistently applied our capital allocation strategy for many 
years. Organic growth is our first priority and we’re committed 
to R&D investment for new products, manufacturing processes 
and global support infrastructure to generate growth in future 
returns and improve productivity, as well as committing to the 
investment needed to transition to Net Zero. We demonstrated 
this during the year through our capital expenditure and 
investments in R&D.
We introduced Return on invested capital* as a new KPI 
this year. This assesses our efficiency in allocating capital to 
profitable investments. We achieved 12.3% this year, which 
was lower than last year (FY2023: 16.1%), due to a combination 
of lower pre-tax profits, higher tax rates and recent increases in 
our non-current asset base. We expect to drive this metric back 
towards our target of 15% with higher profits and lower levels 
of future capital expenditure.
We may supplement organic growth with acquisitions in current 
and adjacent market niches that are aligned to our strategy.
We have always valued having cash in the bank to protect the 
core business from downturns, and we monitor our cash against 
a minimum holding according to forecast overheads and revenue 
downturn scenarios. This cash also allows us to react swiftly as 
investment or market capture opportunities arise. Actual and 
forecast returns, along with our strong financial position, support 
our progressive dividend policy, which aims to increase the 
dividend per share while maintaining a prudent level of 
dividend cover.
Earnings per share and dividend
Adjusted* earnings per share is 133.2p, compared with 155.1p 
last year, while Statutory earnings per share is 133.2p, compared 
with 159.7p last year. We paid an interim dividend of 16.8 pence 
per share (FY2023: 16.8 pence) on 9 April 2024 and are pleased 
to propose a final dividend of 59.4 pence per share in respect 
of the year (FY2023: 59.4 pence). This would bring the overall 
dividend per share to 76.2 pence, equal to the total dividend for 
FY2023. Despite lower profit this year, we have considered the 
Company’s future growth plans and strong cash reserves, 
and so have proposed to maintain the dividend per share 
this year.
Looking forward
We remain committed to our organic growth strategy 
and will continue to invest in our people, infrastructure 
and product innovation. 
In recent years we have made significant investments in our 
manufacturing capacity and our global ERP system to position 
the business for long-term growth and improved productivity. 
We expect these investments to drive a higher return on invested 
capital in the years ahead. 
As we reduce capital expenditure from its recent exceptional 
levels and continue to focus on controlling working capital, 
we aim to further improve cash flow conversion. 
With the infrastructure in place to deliver growth, we are targeting 
an improved Adjusted operating profit margin this year. 
Allen Roberts
Group Finance Director
11 September 2024
*Note 29, ‘Alternative performance measures’, defines how each of these measures is calculated.
28
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Review of product groups
Our five product groups pursue innovation-led growth in both established and 
emerging markets. These markets have a combined addressable value of £6 billion, 
where structural drivers and global trends contribute to attractive through-cycle growth 
rates of at least 5%. Over the following pages we provide more detail on our structure 
and explain how each product group supports customers in their respective markets, 
while looking to capture the opportunities and manage the risks associated with these 
trends. Our strategy for long-term value creation is described on pages 7 to 9. 
Business segment: Manufacturing technologies
Our technologies help customers optimise their manufacturing processes and capabilities. Our products and software help 
to create more efficient, sustainable and innovative factories. We provide our Manufacturing technologies customers with:
Precision – giving customers accurate and precise production processes to deliver higher performance and sustainability. 
Productivity – offering manufacturers higher process yields, faster cycle times and more automation.
Practicality – products that are easier to use and have embedded knowledge and data analytics.
Our product groups
Our established products
Our emerging products
Our key markets
Industrial Metrology
Measurement and control 
of precision component 
manufacturing processes.
	
— CMM sensors
	
— Machine tool probes
	
— Styli and fixturing
	
— CMM and gauging systems
	
— Metrology software
	
— Smart factory software 
platform
	
— Automotive
	
— Electronics
	
— Semiconductors
	
— Aerospace and defence
	
— Precision manufacturing
Position Measurement
Precision motion control of robots, 
machinery and factory automation.
	
— Open optical encoders
	
— Laser encoders
	
— Magnetic encoders
	
— Calibration
	
— Enclosed optical encoders
	
— Industrial automation 
for robots
Additive Manufacturing 
Production of intricate metal 
components from a digital model.
	
— Industrial metal 3D printers
	
— Build preparation and 
process monitoring 
software
Business segment: Analytical instruments and medical devices
Customers in this segment tend to be end users of our technologies working in healthcare and academia. Our innovative Spectroscopy 
(S) products help our customers improve their materials analysis, while our Neurological (N) solutions support cutting-edge therapies 
and enable research into previously untreatable conditions. Customer engagement and support is a key differentiator and we can 
configure our products according to different needs. Our products deliver: 
Precision – high-resolution sampling (S); accurate and precise device delivery and improved procedure safety (N). 
Productivity – automated analysis and rapid, reliable results (S); fast planning, automated placement and shorter surgeries (N). 
Practicality – configurable products to suit customer needs (S); support for image-guided surgical planning to help create 
more predictable patient outcomes (N).
Our product groups
Our established products
Our emerging products
Our key markets
Spectroscopy
Materials analysis instruments.
	
— Laboratory Raman 
spectrometers
	
— Industrial process Raman 
spectrometers
	
— Academia
	
— Healthcare
	
— High-tech manufacturing
	
— Pharmaceutical
Neurological
Central nervous system surgical 
and drug delivery solutions.
	
— Neurosurgical robot
	
— Surgical planning software 
	
— Drug delivery system
29
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Review of product groups continued
Manufacturing technologies
What we do 
We make sensors, measurement systems and 
software that allow customers to precisely measure 
machined parts, generate inspection reports and 
control the performance of their production machines. 
Our products are used throughout production – either 
directly on metal-cutting machines, on the shop floor 
nearby, or in a separate quality lab. 
Industrial Metrology is the most established part of 
our business and we have customers across almost 
every sector of manufacturing. And because of our 
long track record in this area, some of them have 
been working with us for decades. 
Our markets and the trends that 
affect them 
Some of our biggest markets include aerospace, 
automotive, consumer electronics and defence, 
which all rely on highly repeatable, efficient 
processes to make increasingly complex parts 
with tighter tolerances. 
We’re seeing a general trend towards more 
automation and ‘smart’ factories across all our 
sectors. We make products that support this trend, 
like our Renishaw Central software platform, which 
connects measurement machines and computer 
numerically controlled (CNC) machines to improve 
the automation of process control. We’re seeing our 
measurement systems, such as our AGILITY range 
of co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs) and our 
Equator range of shop-floor gauges, becoming more 
prevalent, as measurement becomes more about 
controlling active processes.
Sustainability is a growing issue for our customers 
too, as they develop their own goals and targets 
to lower their impact on the world. Our automated 
measurement tools can help here, since they improve 
manufacturing efficiency, which reduces both waste 
material and energy use.
Meanwhile, the combination of supply chain 
disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic and rising 
geopolitical tensions has pushed security of supply 
up the agenda, with more customers looking to 
diversify their supply chains into other regions. 
All our Manufacturing technologies product groups 
benefit from this because our well-respected global 
subsidiary network gives us the opportunity to rapidly 
transfer engineering knowledge and experience 
around the world.
Our priorities for the future 
Looking ahead, we see continued demand for 
better efficiency, flexibility and reduced wastage 
in manufacturing processes, which is driving the 
trend towards shop-floor automation of process 
control. This benefits our Additive Manufacturing 
product group as well. 
We also want to continue expanding our customer 
relationships to help us prioritise future investment 
in research and development. These longstanding 
relationships have been particularly helpful in 
defining our future product roadmaps. As our 
measurement technologies become more advanced, 
process control becomes more integrated into 
manufacturing processes, and we provide more 
holistic solutions, we expect to work even more 
closely with our customers.
For more information on this year’s business 
performance, see our Chief Executive’s review 
on pages 4 to 6.
Industrial Metrology
Find out more 
about our 
Industrial 
Metrology 
solutions in 
our Virtual-
Expo.
30
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

What we do 
Renishaw’s Position Measurement products help 
customers build, calibrate, control and check 
precision machines in a wide variety of applications. 
Our position encoders provide electronic feedback 
on machine motion to ensure accuracy and enable 
automated operation, while our calibration systems 
are used to fine-tune the set-up and check the 
continued operation of those machines. These 
systems are used at all stages of the machine 
construction and operation process, so we focus 
heavily on practicality and usability to ensure easy 
deployment and low cost of ownership. That 
includes continuous development of our CARTO 
calibration software for efficient machine set-up 
and maintenance.
Our business is very collaborative and we encourage 
our engineers and designers to visit our customers 
to help develop precise, reliable tools that meet their 
specific needs. Many of our experts have worked for 
Renishaw for a long time and their knowledge has 
helped us build a reputation for deep, longstanding 
relationships. That reputation is reinforced by the 
fact we use many of our Precision Measurement 
products in our own processes as well as within some 
of our Industrial Metrology, Additive Manufacturing 
and Spectroscopy products.
Our markets and the trends that 
affect them 
This is a highly demanding sector that requires 
speed, precision and reliability, and our products 
are used in a range of applications, including 
semiconductor chip production, flat panel display 
manufacture and robotics.
Semiconductors and microelectronics are some 
of our biggest markets. Our encoders are used 
at all stages of the production process, from 
manufacturing silicon wafers to packaging and 
testing individual devices. While the general outlook 
for semiconductors remains positive, demand for 
our products has been lower this year, due to customer 
overstocking, driven in large part by huge demand for 
consumer electronics during the COVID-19 pandemic 
and ongoing supply chain uncertainty. 
However, we are already seeing a return to growth 
over the longer term, caused partly by changes in 
global trading relations. Many major industrialised 
nations are keen to reduce their reliance on dominant 
geographical sources of supply and have announced 
plans to invest in their own semiconductor production 
facilities. That investment will take time to filter through. 
We also expect continuous improvements in the 
technology that underpins everyday items, like 
smartphones, televisions and both internal combustion 
engine and electric vehicles. Growth in the use of 
artificial intelligence and robotics should also drive 
demand. For example, some our newest products are 
helping customers introduce highly efficient, accurate 
robots into their industrial manufacturing and 
warehouse management processes. 
Our priorities for the future 
Given the wider societal trends towards 
automation and robotics, we see continued 
potential for growth for our Position Measurement 
products. Our combination of deep market 
knowledge and longstanding customer 
relationships will remain essential in helping us 
realise that potential. And while we will continue 
to invest a significant proportion of our revenue in 
research and development, we will ensure we do so 
in the areas where we can make the most impact, 
and help our customers achieve their goals as cost 
effectively as possible. 
For more information on this year’s business 
performance, see our Chief Executive’s review 
on pages 4 to 6.
Position Measurement 
Find out more 
about our 
encoders for 
position and 
motion control.
Find out more 
about our 
machine 
calibration and 
optimisation 
products.
Find out more 
about our 
industrial 
automation 
solutions.
31
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Review of product groups continued
What we do 
Additive Manufacturing (AM) – also known as 3D 
printing – is the process of making 3D components 
by building up layers of material. Our AM machines 
use high-powered lasers to selectively melt sections 
of fine metal powder. This process is repeated, 
layer by layer, to build high-strength, complex 
components that often can’t be made using 
traditional manufacturing techniques. 
AM has historically been used exclusively for 
rapid prototyping, one-off parts and small batch 
production. Our focus is on developing solutions 
that accelerate AM use for high-volume manufacturing 
applications, helping customers scale up application 
– from proof of concept to serial production – by 
providing market-leading productivity for cost-
effective manufacture.
Our software solutions mean our AM machines 
can be integrated with other ‘smart’ manufacturing 
technologies, including third-party manufacturing 
execution systems (MES) and design tools, which 
make the most of 3D printing’s strengths to create 
designs with enhanced functional performance.
Like our other Manufacturing technologies products, 
we use AM in our own processes, so we understand 
the challenges of AM volume production. This includes 
the cultural shift needed in the way engineers optimise 
product designs for AM rather than subtractive 
manufacturing. Our applications engineers work 
closely with our key customers to help them make 
that shift, and our track record as a trusted partner 
translates into repeat system sales. The fact that 
many of our target manufacturing customers 
already use our Industrial Metrology and Position 
Measurement products also helps this process. 
Our markets and the trends that 
affect them 
We see enormous growth potential in AM, with the 
aerospace and medical sectors as early adopters. 
In aerospace, which is a long-established market for 
our Manufacturing technologies products, lighter AM 
components are helping to increase fuel efficiency 
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In healthcare, 
as ageing populations drive demand for orthopaedic 
implants, AM enables designs that include lattice 
structures, which encourage bone integration and 
improve patient recovery. 
As with any disruptive technology, there are several 
barriers to widespread adoption, with cost-per-part 
the biggest barrier. With machine time the biggest 
contributor to the cost of making AM parts, our 
newest machines and software are tackling that 
challenge head on, reducing build times by up to 
50%, without compromising quality. This makes AM 
economically viable to a greater range of sectors, 
and we’re seeing increased interest in defence 
and consumer electronics applications, driven by 
underlying global trends that also benefit our Industrial 
Metrology and Position Measurement products.
Our priorities for the future 
We’re excited about AM’s disruptive potential to 
change the way a wide range of products are 
made and our focus is on continuing to deepen our 
customer relationships to support their applications 
as they scale up. At the same time, we are pursuing 
further innovations to boost productivity and lower 
costs. We see collaboration with the wider AM 
industry as important for driving adoption, so we’ll 
continue to work closely with international committees 
to standardise AM processes and software partners 
to maximise the value of digital tools. 
For more information on this year’s business 
performance, see our Chief Executive’s review 
on pages 4 to 6.
Additive Manufacturing
Find out more 
about our 
Additive 
Manufacturing 
systems.
32
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

What we do 
We make Raman spectrometers that help customers 
analyse the chemical and structural properties 
of materials. 
Our flexible, high-performance devices can be used 
in a wide range of applications, from research and 
development into new materials and healthcare, 
to forensics and cultural heritage. Today, we are 
one of the top three global Raman spectrometer 
manufacturers by market share. 
We design our products to be highly modular, 
allowing our customers to configure a spectrometer 
to their specific needs. We also focus on making it 
easier to integrate our systems with other analytical 
techniques, such as scanning electron microscopes, 
to enable our customers to conduct ‘multimodal’ 
imaging. Meanwhile, our robust, transportable 
Virsa Raman analyser enables customers to carry 
out lab-quality analysis in the field or in a factory. 
This year, our Virsa Raman spectrometer was 
used to analyse stones at Stonehenge in the UK.
Our markets and the trends that 
affect them
Academia is our biggest, most mature market, where 
Raman spectrometry is widely used in research and 
development. While demand remains strong for 
flexible and powerful systems, the sector can be 
affected by geopolitical events since it relies heavily on 
government funding. This year, for example, we saw 
reduced demand as attention turned to the upcoming 
US presidential election in November 2024. However, 
we have a strong reputation in the sector and plenty 
of experience in planning ahead to manage these 
cycles to ensure that we are well placed to win 
business when funding is released. 
Other growing sectors include healthcare, where 
spectrometers support studies for early cancer 
detection, diagnosing diseases and drug discovery, 
and industrial research, particularly in areas like 
battery development for electric vehicles. Here, the 
precise chemical information provided by our Raman 
spectrometers enables manufacturers to fine tune the 
quantities of materials to make batteries more efficient 
and cost effective. 
Meanwhile, we are well placed to benefit from the 
continuing trend among customers looking to 
incorporate materials analysis into the shop floor 
to help them better understand their products and 
processes, and solve problems more quickly. As the 
technology is more widely adopted and this market 
matures, we expect demand for systems like the 
Virsa analyser to grow significantly.
Our priorities for the future 
The number of applications for Raman spectrometers 
is growing, as is their maturity, representing a significant 
opportunity to expand our existing portfolio into 
adjacent markets. For example, we see significant 
growth potential in the bioprocessing sector. 
Here, Raman spectrometers can measure the 
concentrations of nutrients in bioreactors, ensuring 
the user can maintain an optimum condition for the 
culture, and allowing more efficient production of end 
product. While we already have a strong network in 
academia, we work closely with our sales colleagues 
to develop the connections we need to make the 
most of new opportunities. It is critical that we 
continue to innovate, investing in the next generation 
of products, adding new features and functionality 
to support our longstanding academic customers, 
who remain key to our future success. 
For more information on this year’s business 
performance, see our Chief Executive’s review 
on pages 4 to 6.
Spectroscopy
Analytical instruments and medical devices
Find out more 
about our 
Spectroscopy 
products.
33
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Review of product groups continued
What we do 
We design and make products that help clinicians 
deliver therapies and treatments for patients with 
neurological diseases in a safe, effective and 
predictable way. Those products include our 
neuromate surgical robot, and navigation and 
planning software, which help surgeons with 
precision tool positioning and implant placement. 
We also supply accessories that support procedures 
like deep-brain stimulation and biopsy.
Our drug delivery system is used to deliver therapies 
or drugs directly to a patient’s brain. It can be used for 
gene therapies, which are usually delivered in a single 
dose (acute), or for drugs that need to be administered 
repeatedly over time (chronic). Our chronic system is 
the only one of its kind and is enabling research into 
previously untreatable neurological conditions and 
diseases, including brain tumours.
Trust is an essential part of our business and we have 
a reputation for building deep relationships with our 
customers, based on openness, honesty and integrity.
Our markets and the trends that 
affect them 
Our two main markets are healthcare and 
pharmaceutical. Healthcare providers and hospitals 
are looking for faster, more precise surgical therapies 
to increase procedure efficiency and improve patient 
outcomes. Demand is growing for more economical 
and patient-specific treatments, as well as 
technologies to reduce the potential for human error. 
Our neuromate surgical robot and planning software 
helps on both fronts, enabling surgeons to plan 
a procedure ahead of surgery, saving time in the 
operating theatre. We continue to see new competition 
emerging in the area of surgical robotics, but we are 
well established in brain surgery.
Meanwhile, we’re working with pharmaceutical 
customers to create innovative products that help 
develop new treatments for neurological diseases. 
This is an exciting, challenging market that has 
been particularly affected by the macroeconomic 
landscape in the past few years. Drug trials have 
always been expensive to run and inflationary 
pressures, caused by global economic uncertainty, 
have driven costs up further and slowed investment. 
However, we’re seeing early signs of recovery and 
remain confident in the future of this market. Rising 
global life expectancy and ageing populations mean 
we expect pharmaceutical customers will need 
more innovation to treat the increasing prevalence 
in late-onset diseases such as Parkinson’s and 
dementia. Our products position us at the centre 
of the research that is needed today to develop the 
treatments and delivery systems that will address 
those increases in the future. 
Our priorities for the future 
Inflation across the sector has increased our 
costs and those of our customers in recent years, 
so we will continue to prudently manage our costs. 
At the same time, we need to invest carefully in 
areas such as drug delivery and range-extending 
neurosurgical applications, so that we are ready for 
the rapid growth we expect in our main markets. 
Accelerating our new product development 
programmes and market approvals will also be 
a focus for us.
For more information on this year’s business 
performance, see our Chief Executive’s review 
on pages 4 to 6.
Neurological
Find out more 
about our 
neurosurgery 
and drug 
delivery 
solutions.
34
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Introducing our ESG strategy
Developed using the United Nations Sustainable 
Development Goals (UN SDGs) as a guide, our ESG 
strategy sets out three environmental, social and 
governance goals. These are supported by a series 
of strategic objectives intended to help us address 
the areas where we can have the biggest impact. 
Our goals and objectives go beyond the Net Zero 
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions targets that we set 
in FY2021, since we know that creating a sustainable 
future requires more than reducing emissions. 
By raising and broadening our ambitions, we also 
want to empower our people to make a positive 
difference to our business, stakeholders and planet.
Using our materiality assessment to inform 
our strategy 
To develop our ESG strategy, we needed to know 
what our stakeholders care about and identify the 
topics that are most significant to our business. To do 
that, we completed a double materiality assessment, 
with support from external sustainability experts. 
We also carried out a series of interviews and surveys 
with internal and external stakeholders, including 
employees, customers, suppliers and investors.
As well as helping us better understand how our 
operations affect people and the environment, we 
used the assessment to review the ESG factors that 
affect our performance, reputation and longevity as 
an organisation. As a result of this initial materiality 
assessment we have focused our ESG strategy on 
the topics below:
Environment
	
— Energy use and GHG emissions.
	
— Low-carbon transition and climate risk. 
	
— Product design and life cycle management.
	
— Innovation to support customers’ sustainability goals.
	
— Environmentally responsible procurement.
Social
	
— Talent attraction, development and retention.
	
— Human rights.
	
— Diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities.
Governance
	
— Business conduct and ethics.
Our ESG goals
Environment
Innovate with our customers and suppliers to achieve more 
with less, working towards Net Zero carbon emissions while 
minimising all environmental sustainability impacts.
Social
Develop a diverse and inclusive team who are inspired 
to work for a responsible business.
Governance 
Ensure appropriate governance arrangements are in place 
to provide accountability, transparency, compliance and 
integrity as a responsible business.
Introduction from our Chief Executive
We have always been proud of our role in helping our 
customers create products, materials and therapies that 
touch billions of lives. It’s why we articulate our purpose 
as ‘Transforming Tomorrow Together’. 
That purpose has never been more relevant. As a responsible 
business that believes in acting with integrity, we strive to help 
create a more sustainable future. That means making our own 
products in ways that minimise our impact on people and the 
planet, and helping our customers and suppliers achieve their 
own sustainability goals. 
So, I am delighted that we have reached a significant 
milestone in our approach to sustainability, launching our 
first environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategy. 
Built on our core values and commitment to doing business 
responsibly, our ESG strategy includes a set of goals and 
strategic objectives to help us make tangible progress. 
These goals provide a roadmap to help our talented people 
continue to develop the products that will help solve global 
challenges. This includes reducing waste and increasing 
energy efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain diverse 
and inclusive workplaces where people are inspired to work 
for a responsible business. Importantly, our strategy also 
aligns with our business strategy and model, which aim 
to create long-term value for all our stakeholders (see pages 
7 to 9 for more information). 
And because we need everyone at Renishaw to play their 
part, I am also pleased to be chairing our new ESG Steering 
Committee. As well as overseeing progress of our ESG 
strategy, the Committee will provide the support our people 
need to help accelerate and enhance our contribution to 
a more sustainable future.
Will Lee
Chief Executive and Chair of the ESG Steering Committee
Our approach to ESG
ESG review
A strategy guided by the UN SDGs 
We have aligned our ESG strategy 
with the three UN SDGs that are 
most material to our business. 
35
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
ESG review continued
Governing our approach to sustainability 
Our commitment to doing business responsibly underpins 
everything we do. That starts at the very top of Renishaw, 
which is why we have also established a new ESG Steering 
Committee to support our ESG strategy and strengthen our 
governance framework (see illustration below). Chaired by our 
Chief Executive, Will Lee, members include our Independent 
Non-executive Director Stephen Wilson and representatives 
from our key product divisions and commercial functions, 
sustainability teams, HR and Finance. 
See our Section 172 statement on pages 64 to 66 for more 
information on how the Board considered our stakeholders 
before approving our ESG Steering Committee and strategy. 
Reporting
Informing
Our sustainability governance framework
Renishaw plc Board 
Oversees all sustainability matters including strategies, goals and targets, policies, 
procedures, performance, disclosures and risk.
ESG Steering Committee
Responsible for developing and overseeing the Group’s 
ESG strategy and reporting. It is accountable for our 
goals and strategic objectives and regularly reviews and 
scrutinises our progress against them. The Committee 
also defines actions needed to mitigate climate-related 
risks and make the most of potential opportunities.
Risk Committee
Ensures that our climate-related 
risks are effectively managed 
through our risk management 
and internal controls.
Environmental Sustainability Committee
Oversees the implementation of the environmental 
aspects of our ESG strategy and monitors progress 
against our goals and key performance indicators (KPIs). 
The Committee also recommends strategy improvements 
or changes to the ESG Steering Committee.
Audit Committee
Reviews the effectiveness of our 
risk management and climate-
related assurance.
Executive Committee
Responsible for achieving sustainability 
targets in the business functions each 
Committee member represents.
Remuneration Committee
Sets the remuneration policy in 
alignment with strategic objectives 
including sustainability.
How we report on ESG matters 
This year we have aligned our sustainability reporting with 
our new ESG strategy, creating an ESG review that replaces the 
Managing our resources and relationships section of previous 
reports. We provide details of the strategic objectives that we 
have set to help achieve our three ESG goals within their relevant 
sections. Our ESG information is now structured as follows:
	
— How we engage with our stakeholders – provides details on 
our key stakeholder groups, and why and how we engage 
with them. See pages 23 to 25.
	
— Environment – provides details on how we are addressing 
GHG emissions in our own operations as well as working 
with our customers and suppliers to tackle their sustainability 
challenges. See pages 37 to 41. We report our Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures on pages 46 to 51.
	
— Social – here we review the work we’re doing to create a more 
inclusive workplace and develop clear career progression 
plans. We also provide details of our first global employee 
survey, our health and safety performance, and work to 
strengthen our approach to human rights. See pages 42 to 44.
	
— Governance – provides more information on the steps we’re 
taking to strengthen our approach to key governance topics, 
including the launch of our new Code of Conduct. The Board’s 
role in overseeing our corporate governance is discussed 
throughout the Governance report, pages 54 to 69.
36
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Developing products for a more 
sustainable future 
For more than 50 years, our products and solutions have 
helped customers solve technological and scientific challenges. 
Increasingly, our commitment to providing unparalleled levels 
of precision, productivity and practicality means that many of 
our products also play an important role in helping our 
customers achieve their sustainability goals. 
To truly play our part in creating a more sustainable future, 
we need to ensure that we make those products in ways 
that lower our own impact on the environment. That means 
addressing the direct Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in our 
operations and working across our value chain to address our 
indirect Scope 3 emissions. Our new environment goal, and 
the series of strategic objectives (see above) that support it, 
are designed to help us do that. 
Environment 
Our environment goal
Innovate with our customers and suppliers 
to achieve more with less, working towards 
Net Zero carbon emissions while minimising 
all environmental impacts.
Our strategic objectives are: 
Climate
	
— Reduce GHG emissions associated with 
product design, service and use.
	
— Achieve more than 50% reduction in GHG 
emissions from our operations, purchased 
energy and supply chain by 2030, as part 
of progress towards Net Zero.
	
— Continue to ensure strategic business 
decisions reflect the climate-related financial 
risks and impacts for our business.
Customer solutions
	
— Progressively achieve growth from sales of 
new and existing products with quantifiable 
sustainability benefits for our customers over 
the period 2025-2028.
Responsible procurement 
	
— Reduce sustainability impacts and potential 
risks from purchased goods and services 
across Renishaw’s global supply chain over 
the period 2024-2028.
Tackling our greenhouse gas emissions 
to reach Net Zero
While our ESG strategy is new, our commitment to tackling our 
emissions is not, and we have had an active emissions reduction 
programme for almost a decade. In 2021, we formalised that 
work by committing to reach Net Zero by FY2050 through 
a series of specific GHG emissions targets, which were later 
approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). 
These targets commit the Company to:
Overall Net Zero target – reach Net Zero GHG emissions 
across our value chain by FY2050.
Near-term targets – reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG 
emissions by 90% by FY2028 from a FY2020 base year. 
We also commit to reduce absolute Scope 3 emissions by 
50% by FY2030 from a FY2020 base year. 
Long-term targets – maintain a minimum of 90% absolute 
reduction in Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions from FY2028 
through to FY2050, from a FY2020 base year.
We estimate that our Scope 3 emissions represent 97% of 
our total GHG emissions and our largest sources come from 
the energy our products use, the materials, services and 
equipment needed to make them, and then delivering them 
to our customers. These emissions account for more than 89% 
of our total Scope 3 emissions. 
Our climate transition plans 
While our new ESG strategy sets out two strategic objectives 
built around reducing our GHG emissions, our climate transition 
plans are our roadmap for achieving our science-based Net Zero 
targets. The plans address the Scope 1 and 2 emissions caused 
by our business, and the Scope 3 emissions embedded within 
our value chain (see page 39).
Our Scope 1 and 2 climate transition plan 
Scope 1 and 2 make up 3% of our total GHG emissions and 
represent the emissions associated with running our business. 
We have made further progress over the past 12 months, 
reducing these emissions by 14% compared to our previous 
financial year. The majority of that reduction has been achieved 
in Scope 2 by ensuring an almost global coverage of renewable 
electricity contracts or certificates, and our continued investment 
in renewable self-generation capacity. Our Scope 1 emissions 
have increased compared to our previous financial year but our 
transition plan shows how we intend to effectively reduce them to 
meet our targets. 
In the table on the next page we provide a snapshot of this year’s 
main activities, as well as our plans for the future. 
37
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
ESG review continued
Key activities for reducing our Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Actions in FY2024
What we’re aiming to do next
Using lower-carbon 
sources of energy 
to run our facilities
	
— Invested another £8m into projects that support 
our work to achieve our science-based Scope 1 
and 2 emissions reduction target.
	
— Matched 99% of the grid electricity that we use in 
our buildings with electricity added to the grid from 
renewable sources.1
	
— Opened our new site in Brazil, which is LEED 
(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) 
Gold certified. The site was built using thermally 
efficient materials and includes solar panels and 
electric vehicle charging.
	
— Increased solar power generation capacity at our 
manufacturing sites in India and Ireland and 
self-generated 9% of our total electricity use.
	
— Replacing heating oil at two of our European sites 
– one in Germany in 2025 and one in Switzerland 
in 2027 – with lower-carbon alternative systems.
	
— Replacing all natural gas systems with lower-carbon 
alternatives at our UK and Ireland manufacturing sites 
by the end of 2027.
Switching to 
lower-carbon 
forms of transport
	
— Ordered 36 ultra-low emission vehicles to replace 
fossil fuel vehicles in our fleet in 10 locations, including 
Germany, France, China, India, Mexico and Canada.
	
— Started using lower-carbon bioethanol fuel in all 
our company vehicles in Brazil, where possible.
	
— Developing plans to make annual incremental changes 
to our vehicle fleets by replacing traditional internal 
combustion engines with ultra-low emission vehicles.
1	 Our use of renewable electricity is facilitated in part by obtaining renewable electricity certificates (RECs). These certificates verify that electricity has been 
contributed to the grid from renewable energy sources, including wind, solar and hydropower. 
Key external factors that affect our plan
Successfully achieving these next steps will depend on certain 
external factors beyond our control. For example, while we are 
increasing the quantity of renewable electricity that we generate 
ourselves at our own sites, our plan relies on the continued 
availability of renewable electricity contracts backed by renewable 
energy certificates. One way we can minimise this dependency 
could be to set up a power purchase agreement, which would 
allow us to directly source electricity from a renewable generator.
Meanwhile, reducing our transport emissions relies on the 
availability of ultra-low emission vehicles, adequate charging 
infrastructure and a low-carbon electricity grid. At the moment, 
it is not viable to use ultra-low emission vehicles in some of the 
countries where we operate. We are prioritising flexibility in 
our vehicle fleets in these locations so that we can react to 
improvements and source lower-carbon vehicles when they 
become a viable option.
Scope 1 and 2 transition plan
0
500
1,500
1,000
2,500
2,000
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
FY2020
Baseline year
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
FY2025
FY2026
FY2027
FY2028
Scope 1 emissions (tCO2e)
tCO2e
Market-based Scope 2 (tCO2e)
Projection to FY2028
Projection to FY2028
Net Zero 
in Scope 1 
and 2 by 
FY2028
38
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Key activities for reducing our Scope 3 emissions
Actions in FY2024
What we’re aiming to do next
Procurement
	
— Invested in a supplier relationship platform so that we can 
collect sustainability data from our suppliers and monitor their 
decarbonisation progress.
	
— Engaged with 22 of our most emissions-intensive suppliers 
and supported them to establish their emissions sources, 
collect and calculate emissions data, create an emissions 
baseline, set emissions targets and develop emissions 
reduction plans. 
	
— Changed our raw aluminium supply from a primary grade 
to aluminium with a minimum recycled content of 75%.
	
— Use our new platform to gather specific 
product carbon footprint data from suppliers 
and extend our supplier selection criteria for 
both existing and new suppliers to include 
climate considerations.
	
— Expand our sustainability engagement to 
cover suppliers that account for the majority of 
our spend on goods and services. We intend 
to support them in reducing GHG emissions, 
committing to science-based climate targets 
and delivering their decarbonisation plans.
Product materials
	
— Calculated the embodied GHG emissions in metals, electronics 
and other raw materials we use to make our products across 
our four largest product divisions. We’ve used this information 
to identify and prioritise projects that will help us redesign 
products so that we can make them with lower-carbon materials 
and processes.
	
— Collaborated with our manufacturing teams to introduce a new 
way to make our encoder bodies. This reduces our metal 
wastage by between 33% and 56% depending on the type 
of encoder body.
	
— Develop our systems and processes 
to include more emissions-related 
information that can support low-carbon 
decision-making in our design and 
manufacturing stages.
	
— Use additive manufacturing techniques 
to further reduce our waste and emissions, 
and support our customers to make 
emissions savings by reducing the weight 
of our products.
Product 
distribution
	
— Started investigating our options to calculate emissions 
consistently across all our logistics carriers around the world 
to help identify new opportunities to reduce emissions and 
continue developing our transition plan.
	
— Innovate our global logistics practices to 
support more use of lower-carbon modes 
of transport such as ocean and rail freight.
Our Scope 3 climate transition plan 
Scope 3 emissions represent a significant proportion of our GHG 
emissions, and, since they are embedded within our value chain, 
they are also the trickiest to address. 
This year, we changed the financial modelling methodology 
that we use to calculate emissions from our purchased goods 
and services back to our baseline year. This is because the 
previous methodology is no longer available. We have also, for 
the first time, quantified the emissions from the use of our sold 
0
10,000
30,000
20,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
FY2020
Baseline year
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
FY2030
FY2050
Category 1 and 2 – Purchased goods and services/Capital goods
Category 11 – Use of sold products
Category 4 – Upstream transportation and distribution
Other Scope 3 categories
Target
50% reduction
by FY2030
Net Zero
by FY2050
tCO2e
Scope 3 transition plan
products back to our baseline year. As a result, the source and 
quantity of our Scope 3 emissions back to our baseline year are 
different, but more comprehensive, than previously stated.
Our Scope 3 emissions have been increasing since our baseline 
year, largely driven by the 35% growth in revenue since FY2020, 
which directly influences our most significant Scope 3 emissions 
sources. However, we have taken important steps this year to 
enable reductions in our Scope 3 emissions in those significant 
areas, as we explain in the key activities table below.
39
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
ESG review continued
Key activities for reducing our Scope 3 emissions
Actions in FY2024
What we’re aiming to do next
Product use
	
— Calculated the energy consumption of all our major product 
lines and assessed the potential GHG emissions associated 
with our products across their lifetimes. This is helping us 
prioritise projects to design products with reduced energy 
consumption and lower emissions.
	
— Help our customers reduce their own 
emissions by providing lower-carbon 
products and providing clear, meaningful 
and credible information that demonstrates 
this positive impact.
Product service, 
repair and 
end-of-life
	
— Enhanced the onboard logging software of our Equator gauges 
to provide more remote support for our customers and reduce 
our travel emissions.
	
— Design our products to maximise their 
serviceability and repairability and, where 
not possible, ensure they can be repurposed 
or recycled.
	
— Develop more localised support for repair, 
maintenance and analysis of products to 
reduce travel distances.
Other initiatives
	
— Completed GHG emissions baselines at our major UK 
manufacturing sites to identify opportunities to reduce 
emissions in areas like purchased materials, energy use, 
machine waste, scrap and factory consumables.
	
— Introduce carbon pricing and carbon 
budgets across all our business functions 
to help prioritise emissions reduction 
projects and contextualise potential 
trade-offs with other business needs.
Contributing to 
an economy-wide 
transition
	
— Joined the Confederation of British Industry’s Sustainability 
Committee, which brings together business leaders to find 
practical solutions to common challenges to deliver 
decarbonisation and broader environmental goals.
	
— Hosted a roundtable session with one of our largest 
customers to collaborate and share knowledge in areas like 
emissions reduction plans, product carbon footprint analysis, 
setting science-based targets, supply chain engagements, 
and strategy development.
	
— Identify other opportunities to support 
collective action and collaboration in our 
value chain and beyond, to intensify the 
action needed to create systematic change 
where it is needed.
lifetime. We also intend to continue identifying and capitalising 
on opportunities to provide solutions to sectors that support 
a low-carbon economy, such as electric vehicle manufacturing. 
We believe doing this is an essential part of how we will innovate 
and transform our customers’ capabilities with world-leading 
solutions that maximise efficiency, productivity and practicality. 
Developing a climate-resilient approach 
to procurement 
Like many businesses, a large proportion of our Scope 3 
emissions and climate-related risks are located within our 
supply chain. Our new responsible procurement strategic 
objective is designed to help us support our suppliers to 
implement their own emissions reduction plans and build 
their resilience to climate-related risks.
To achieve our Net Zero targets we also need to establish 
low-carbon supply chains. We plan to help our procurement 
team strengthen their knowledge and skills so that they can 
educate and support our suppliers in calculating their 
emissions and creating their own net zero plans and targets.
We are also developing our understanding of our exposure 
to climate risks in our supply chain and our aim is to produce 
a climate-informed procurement strategy with effective risk 
assessment and mitigation.
As well as our climate transition plans, we provide more detail 
on what we’ve achieved so far in our Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures statement on pages 46 to 51.
Key external factors that affect our plan
As with our Scope 1 and 2 emissions, there are many external 
factors that could affect our ability to achieve our aims. For 
example, the electricity that our products use over their lifetime is 
a significant part of our Scope 3 emissions, so achieving our Net 
Zero targets relies on decarbonising the global electricity grid. 
We are also dependent on our suppliers and their wider 
industries sharing our commitment to Net Zero and setting their 
own targets and climate transition plans. Equally, we will need 
more accurate customer and supplier emissions data if we are 
to effectively quantify and report on our progress towards our 
Scope 3 targets. 
Finally, we need structural changes globally and new technological 
advances to fully decarbonise in areas like employee commuting, 
business travel and transportation of our products.
Designing sustainable products our 
customers need
Our products support our customers in increasing their energy 
efficiency and reducing waste. We see this as a big part of how 
we can meaningfully contribute to the transition to a low-carbon 
economy, and is why we have set a customer-focused 
strategic objective.
To support this, we are aiming to implement a methodology 
to quantify the sustainability benefits from all aspects of our 
products, including how they are made, perform, are packaged, 
and how they can be serviced and repaired throughout their 
40
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Read more 
about our 
commitment 
to Net Zero on 
our website.
Our emissions and energy data 
The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and 
Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013 introduced 
changes to require quoted companies to report 
their annual emissions and an intensity ratio in their 
Directors’ Report. The 2018 Regulations bring in 
additional disclosure requirements to disclose 
annual energy use and GHG emissions, and 
related information.
How we calculate our data 
In line with our Group Environmental Data Policy, 
we calculate our GHG emissions using the GHG 
Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting 
Standard (revised edition) and the GHG Protocol 
Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and 
Reporting Standard. 
We use the latest IPCC GWP 100-year horizon 
conversion factors, DESNZ, GHG Protocol, 
supplier-specific and factors taken from 
a respective country’s National Inventory Report 
or national government/agency/regulator to 
calculate our emissions. We base as much data 
as we can on direct sources, such as meter 
readings and utility bills. We use estimated figures 
for June’s Scope 1 and 2 emissions each year to 
ensure timely data capture, then update this data 
in the next Annual Report. 
Data for previous years has been subject to 
a ‘true up’ due to improvements in data capture 
methodologies, official retrospective updates to 
carbon emissions factors, and the correction of 
historical data errors. 
Our ‘statutory emissions’ mean our Scope 1 
and 2 emissions, and we use the market-based 
methodology to account for our efforts in 
generating and purchasing low-carbon energy. 
The location-based method is provided for 
disclosure only. All our emissions data for 
FY2023 and FY2024 has been externally 
assured and received limited assurance – which 
means our data has been deemed as accurate, 
materially correct and a fair representation 
of GHG data and information – against the 
ISO 14064-1:2019 standard.
Total statutory emissions tCO2e
FY2024
4.3k  0.09k 4.39k 
FY2023
3.8k 
1.4k  5.2k
FY2022
3.7k 
2.9k  6.6k 
FY2021
3.6k 
3.1k  6.7k 
FY2020
Scope 1
Scope 2
3.7k 
3.1k  6.8k 
Group energy consumption kWh
FY2024
41.3m 
19.0m  60.3m
FY2023
38.5m 
20.1m  58.6m 
FY2022
39.2m 
19.6m  58.8m 
FY2021
35.7m 
19.5m  55.2m 
FY2020
33.9m 
19.6m  53.5m 
UK
Non-UK
Total measured Scope 2 GHG emissions tCO2e location-based
FY2024
9.0k 
FY2023
8.5k 
FY2022
8.8k 
FY2021
8.2k 
FY2020
8.0k 
Energy source kWh
FY2024
42.7m 
17.6m  60.3m
FY2023
37.9m 
20.7m  58.6m 
FY2022
35.5m 
23.3m  58.8m 
FY2021
32.2m 
23.0m  55.2m 
FY2020
Renewable 
Non-renewable 
30.1m 
23.4m  53.5m 
Statutory GHG emissions tCO2e per £m revenue
FY2024
6.4 
FY2023
7.5 
FY2022
9.9 
FY2021
11.9 
FY2020
13.3 
41
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
ESG review continued
Maturing approach to our people strategy 
Our people have always been our greatest asset and their talent 
and commitment to Renishaw is an essential part of our success. 
To help us continue to achieve our strategic and sustainability 
goals, we need policies and processes to recognise and reward 
our people appropriately and the right frameworks to help them 
build thriving careers at Renishaw. We need to ensure that all 
of this is underpinned by an inclusive working environment and 
a commitment to protecting the human rights of everyone who 
works with and for us. 
We’ve designed our new social goal and strategic objectives 
to help us do that. 
Creating a more inclusive workplace 
Creating an environment where we can embrace diversity 
of thought is one of the best ways to encourage the innovation 
and creativity we need to realise our ambitions. As a responsible 
engineering and manufacturing business that operates in 
a traditionally male-dominated industry and is headquartered 
in a part of the UK where the population is predominantly white 
British, fostering greater diversity is also the right thing to do. 
We continue to monitor our turnover levels (see page 22), and 
the proportion of employees just starting their careers is growing 
and now represents 7% of our total workforce. We are also 
making progress at Board level, with women now representing 
30% of our Board following Professor Dame Karen Holford’s 
appointment in September 2023. 
However, we recognise that diversity among our senior leadership 
does not yet meet today’s expectations of a FTSE 250 company. 
To help change that, we have set a target to have women 
represent 40% of our Senior Management by December 2027. 
And, in line with the Parker Review recommendations, we have 
also set a target to have people from ethnic minorities represent 
10% of our UK-based Senior Management by the same date. 
See our Nomination Committee report on pages 70 to 75 for 
more information. 
Top talent and colleagues from marginalised communities 
can only thrive if a company has a truly inclusive culture that 
enables people to be their best selves, so our initial focus is 
to build on Renishaw’s existing strengths to create a deeper 
sense of inclusion. 
Our growing network of employee-led resource groups (ERGs) 
is an important part of our focus on creating that deeper sense 
of inclusion, and this year we were pleased to launch a new 
group to support neurodiverse colleagues. We’re also building 
a network of allies and ran allyship workshops for more than 
150 employees in the UK and Ireland to encourage them to 
support one another. Meanwhile, our Early Careers Network 
committee, run by apprentices and graduates, created 
a platform for their early careers colleagues to network 
and socialise across Renishaw’s UK facilities.
We also run a range of cultural and religious awareness days 
to build a sense of global community, including Deaf Awareness 
Week, Black History Week and various religious festivals. 
Our events are sponsored by members of our Executive 
Committee, so our senior leaders are helping to set the tone 
from the top and demonstrate the behaviours we need to 
create a more inclusive culture. 
Our gender diversity statistics*
Women
%
Men
% Undisclosed
%
Board1
3
33
6
67
n/a
–
Executive Committee2
1
14
6
86
n/a
–
Senior managers3 and 
subsidiary directors4
13
17
64
83
n/a
–
All employees
1,302
24.5 3,933
75
21
0.5
*All figures as at 30 June 2024.
1 Including the Executive Directors.
2 Including the Executive Directors.
3 As defined by the Companies Act 2006.
4 Means statutory directors.
Social 
Our social goal
Develop a diverse and inclusive team who are 
inspired to work for a responsible business.
Our strategic objectives are: 
	
— Attract, develop and retain a diverse and highly 
engaged team of talent.
	
— Develop and maintain a strong, diverse 
pipeline of future succession for management 
and key critical roles.
	
— Implement a human rights assessment process 
across our business operations and all potential 
higher risk Tier 1 suppliers globally by 2028. 
Supporting STEM education in the UK 
Our UK education outreach programme, which 
focuses on encouraging young people to consider 
science, technology, engineering and mathematics 
(STEM) careers, is an important part of how we 
can build a diverse talent pipeline. This year, our 
programme included visits to local all-girls’ and 
special education needs and disability (SEND) 
schools, as well as schools located in socio-
economically disadvantaged areas. The programme 
is also a key part of our broader community 
engagement. For more information, see page 25.
42
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Continuing work to develop and reward our people
An inclusive culture that attracts a diverse range of talent has 
to be supported by the right career development and reward 
structures to encourage people to build long-term careers 
with us. In turn, this helps us create strong succession plans 
to ensure our future success as a business. 
These are areas where our employees asked for more clarity 
in our 2019 UK engagement survey, and since then we have 
taken significant steps to benchmark and modernise our 
approach. That includes a simplified performance review 
process and more transparent job grading system, and the most 
comprehensive salary review in our history, following global 
benchmarking reviews of all our roles. We’ve also identified 
‘critical’ roles that have a high impact on our business resilience 
and which require skills and knowledge that are either scarce 
or hard to develop. 
To keep improving our approach, this year we introduced 
four Group-wide core competencies and continued to develop 
our functional competency frameworks for our job family groups. 
We have completed this for manufacturing, engineering, product 
management and quality management. We aim to cover the 
remaining job family groups in FY2025.
Having these frameworks will enable our managers to review 
individual performance on an equal basis and help us build 
diverse leadership teams. The steps we’re taking are also 
intended to help people understand what is expected of 
them to do their jobs, working in more agile ways with 
greater accountability. 
And to help us continue to strengthen our approach to 
talent management, we are introducing a ‘nine-box’ talent 
management tool that provides a framework to help managers 
evaluate their team members based on their performance and 
potential. We will use this information to support individual 
career routes and development plans.
Effective leadership is critical to employee engagement 
and our long-term success. This year, our Senior Leadership 
Team worked with a specialist consultancy to strengthen 
their leadership and teamwork skills. They also set ambitious 
internal targets to make change in areas like product innovation 
and productivity across the whole organisation. We intend to 
incorporate these targets into our senior leadership incentive 
plans. Meanwhile, the team is developing a new framework to 
drive strategy delivery across the Group. 
Having successfully completed phase one of our UK benefits 
review, as set out in last year’s Annual Report, we have revised 
our approach to phase two. In the coming year, to achieve 
a more equitable approach for our benefits globally, we aim to 
define a set of global principles. We’re also aiming to identify 
and begin implementing a platform to allow people to see their 
benefits in one place, and roll out a financial wellbeing campaign 
in the UK.
A good result in our first global employee 
engagement survey 
While much of our focus has been driven by employee feedback 
from our 2019 UK engagement survey, it is essential that we 
continue to hear from employees on a regular basis. We were 
particularly pleased, therefore, to run our first ever global 
engagement survey in April 2024. In all, 63% of employees 
responded in 23 different languages. We received an engagement 
score of 74% – 1% above the global average recorded by our 
survey provider. This is a good result, but we’d like to improve and 
will use this year’s score as our baseline to track future progress. 
More broadly, we scored well in areas like ‘intent to stay’, 
‘trust and respect’, and ‘wellbeing’, but still have room for 
improvement in areas like ‘inclusion’, ‘reward’ and ‘career 
progression’. We’ve shown since 2019 that we’re committed 
to responding to employee feedback, and in the next year, 
we will refresh our people strategy based on these results.
Our survey is just one of the ways that we engage with our 
employees. Our Board member and employee engagement 
ambassador Catherine Glickman also spends time meeting 
employees to hear what’s on their mind and shares their 
feedback with her fellow Board members.
This year, Catherine met with a variety of employees, 
including leaders of our manufacturing division and Early 
Careers graduates. She also visited some of our product teams 
and accompanied our Director of Additive Manufacturing, 
Louise Callanan, to visit the AM team. Catherine reported key 
themes back to the Board, including the need to keep investing 
in employee pay, particularly in areas of short talent supply, 
helping people better understand the job opportunities and 
career routes available, and encouraging more women into 
engineering and careers at Renishaw. Catherine will continue 
to engage with employees during the coming financial year.
For more details on some of our other key employee 
engagement channels, see How we engage with stakeholders 
on pages 23 to 25.
74%
of employees told us they 
are highly engaged
75%
consider Renishaw an 
inclusive place to work
69%
said they were highly likely 
to stay with Renishaw
83%
believe Renishaw cares 
about their wellbeing
Highlights from our employee engagement survey 
The figures below provide a snapshot of some of the key results from our first ever global employee engagement survey.
43
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
ESG review continued
Keeping people safe in our operations 
We recognise the importance of providing and promoting safe 
and healthy working practices and we integrate health and safety 
into our daily activities through a robust management system. 
We are also committed to identifying potential hazards and 
making sure we have effective controls to minimise their risk. 
We review our high-risk areas every year and low-risk areas 
every two. Every site, regardless of activity, is assessed against 
our occupational health and safety policy. We also monitor 
incident and accident data to identify and address trends.
This year, we recorded 194 accidents (FY2023: 182) against 
a year-end headcount of 5,256 (FY2023: 5,175), giving us 
an accident frequency rate of 19.89 per million hours worked 
(FY2023: 20.68). This remains very low compared to the 
average for the UK manufacturing sector of 198.8 per million 
hours worked.
We had two reportable accidents under the UK RIDDOR 
reporting requirements during the year. This equates to a rate 
of 0.023 per 100,000 workers and is significantly lower than the 
UK manufacturing sector, which has an average rate of 480. 
One accident related to manual handling operations and the 
other involved contact with machinery. Despite this, we saw 
a marked fall in our manual handling injuries this year, thanks 
to our new manual handling refresher training in the UK. 
There were zero reportable accidents elsewhere globally.
Proactive reporting of near misses remains an important 
way in which we can address issues before they become 
accidents and this year our people reported 264 near misses 
(FY2023: 220). 
We also continued to develop our wellbeing strategy, training 
an additional 32 mental health first aiders to support employees 
in the UK and overseas, and investing in additional training for 
managers to help them support their teams. 
Strengthening our approach to human rights 
We are committed to respecting human rights standards in 
our supply chain, including identifying and managing the risks 
we face in areas like modern slavery, child labour and conflict 
minerals. To date, we have largely focused on modern slavery, 
communicating our expectations to our suppliers on managing 
this important risk. 
We want to expand our approach, so we have set a new strategic 
objective to implement a human rights assessment process 
across our business operations and all potential higher risk Tier 1 
suppliers globally by 2028. 
We have started putting the foundations in place to meet 
this objective. This includes introducing a new global supplier 
relationship management platform to provide a single source 
of supplier performance data and help us better identify and 
manage our human rights risks. We will report more on this area 
of work in future. 
For information on some of the other ways that this platform 
is helping us engage with suppliers, see our climate transition 
plans in the Environment section on pages 37 to 40 and 
Governance section on page 45.
Priorities for the coming year 
A lot of the work we’re doing will take several years to complete, 
so our focus for the next 12 months is largely unchanged. 
Having implemented our core competencies this year, they 
will now be the key drivers we use to model our desired 
organisational behaviours. Other key areas of focus in the 
coming year include: 
	
— using the results of our first global employee survey to 
prioritise the next steps in our people strategy;
	
— developing our functional competency frameworks to help 
our people understand potential career pathways;
	
— incorporating inclusive leadership principles in our leadership 
and management development programmes; 
	
— helping our managers to strengthen their inclusive 
leadership skills; 
	
— ongoing work to modernise our benefits programme; and
	
— improving the checks we have in place – in line with our 
integrity value – to ensure the safeguarding of human rights 
for our employees and supply chains. We will complete these 
improvements in the UK by the end of December 2024, and 
by the end of December 2025 for the wider Group.
44
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

We need to have the right framework, policies and processes 
in place to ensure that we work towards our environment and 
social goals in a responsible and ethical manner. That’s why, 
as part of our ESG strategy, we have set a specific governance 
goal and supporting strategic objective. And, as we explain 
on page 36 we have also established a new ESG Steering 
Committee to develop and oversee the strategy and our 
progress against its implementation.
Launching our new Code of Conduct 
As well as our new ESG Steering Committee, we also 
launched our new Code of Conduct (the Code). It sets out 
our expectations of anyone who works for and with Renishaw. 
Translated into 14 languages, it explains what we mean by ‘doing 
business responsibly’, and provides guidance on how to make 
good decisions, report concerns and non-compliant actions, 
behaviours to watch out for, and our supporting policies. It also 
includes ‘what if’ scenarios to bring different ethical issues to life. 
We officially launched the Code in October 2023, with an 
internal communications campaign that included introductory 
videos from our Chief Executive, Will Lee, and our Group Human 
Resources Director, Diane Canadine. We also held a series of 
webinars with senior managers to raise awareness of the Code 
and encourage them to lead by example. 
Making sure all our employees are aware of the Code is 
a challenge, since many of our sales team travel regularly and our 
colleagues working in manufacturing facilities don’t always have 
regular access to computers. We have therefore used various 
communication channels to ensure that all our employees are 
aware of the principles within the Code and have access to it.
We asked employees to acknowledge that they were aware 
of the Code by completing a formal acknowledgment of the 
Code in our Workday HR platform. 
While our commitment to doing business responsibly won’t 
change, the world around us is evolving rapidly. So, to ensure 
our Code remains fit for purpose, we will review the document 
every three years and update as needed.
Helping people raise concerns 
Having set out our expectations, we want to ensure all our 
stakeholders feel able to speak up if they witness unlawful or 
unethical behaviour, and that, crucially, they know how to do that. 
Our new Code, therefore, shares information on how to raise 
a concern, including details of our Speak Up Policy and 
whistleblowing channels. 
Our confidential Speak Up online portal and global hotline are 
available to current and former employees, including temporary 
employees, as well as external stakeholders, including suppliers, 
distributors, agents, resellers and collaboration partners. This 
year, we logged 31 cases – an increase of 13 cases from the 
previous year. We have undertaken significant work to promote 
the availability of our Speak Up Policy and are encouraged by 
the improved use of whistleblowing channels. We also continue 
to strengthen the way we investigate concerns, which this year 
included new training for people involved in an investigation, 
and an update of our Speak Up standard operating procedure.
For more information on how we govern our Speak Up Policy and 
investigate concerns, see page 61 in our Governance report. 
Strengthening our approach to ESG governance 
The work we’ve done in the past couple of years to prepare the 
Code is all part of our maturing approach to managing important 
sustainability and compliance issues. This supports our 
commitment to strengthening our global compliance brand 
‘Responsible Renishaw’, launched in FY2022. Our compliance 
teams continue to meet regularly at the Responsible Renishaw 
Forum to improve the maturity of our control environment and 
promote good practice and knowledge sharing.
Our investment in a new global supplier relationship 
management platform is a good example of our more 
coordinated approach in action. It provides a standardised 
approach for onboarding new suppliers and will help our 
procurement teams map supply chain risk through sustainability 
and compliance lenses. In future, it will also enable us to track 
and analyse key supplier data so we can demonstrate progress 
against our supplier-related ESG strategy objectives. 
See our Environment section on pages 37 to 41 and Social 
section on pages 42 to 44 for more information on these 
objectives and what we’ve done this year. 
Priorities for the coming year 
Over the next year we will continue to communicate our Code to 
our stakeholders and begin work to develop an internal training 
programme to ensure employees understand how to use it. 
We will use our new supplier relationship management platform 
to continue building on our approach to supplier engagement, 
and will begin rolling out an update to our ‘Know Your Customer’ 
processes and procedures with a new Group policy and 
procedure. This will strengthen the way we onboard new 
customers and suppliers, and outline our expectations on 
key compliance issues, such as anti-bribery and corruption, 
anti-money laundering and trade compliance.
Governance 
Our governance goal
To ensure appropriate governance 
arrangements are in place to provide 
accountability, transparency, compliance 
and integrity as a responsible business.
Our strategic objective: 
	
— Ensure compliance with our Code of Conduct 
and demonstrate responsible business practices.
Download 
our Code of 
Conduct via 
our website. 
45
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures statement
We have continued to build upon the significant work we completed last year in identifying, assessing and managing our 
climate-related risks and opportunities through our climate-related governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics 
and targets. We have aligned our disclosures with the requirements of UK Listing Rule 9.8.6R(8) and the requirements 
of the IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. The disclosures listed below meet these regulatory requirements. They include 
references to our website and other documents that provide further information without making any of the core disclosures 
listed here less understandable.
Governance
Recommendation 
Disclose the organisation’s governance around climate-related risks and opportunities.
Recommended disclosure
A) Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities.
Summary
Reference
	
— Our Board maintains overall responsibility for setting our corporate strategy, which now includes 
clear links to our ESG strategy. This year, our Board delegated oversight of our ESG strategy to 
our new ESG Steering Committee. The strategy includes objectives to minimise our exposure 
to climate-related risks and maximise our climate-related opportunities.
	
— Our ESG Steering Committee is chaired by our Chief Executive, Will Lee, and members are chosen 
to provide the skills and experience we need to effectively oversee our ESG strategy. 
Our Independent Non-executive Director Stephen Wilson is also a member and provides an 
independent perspective.
	
— Our Board has reviewed and approved the transitional climate-related risks and opportunities that 
we financially quantified and incorporated into our five-year plan along with capital expenditure 
estimates related to achieving our Scope 1 and 2 Net Zero target.
More detail on the relationship 
between our corporate strategy 
and climate issues can be found 
on pages 7 and 8.
B) Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
Summary
Reference
	
— 	Our governance structure ensures that we assess and manage our climate-related risks and 
opportunities at the appropriate levels. Each of the following committees has been delegated 
responsibility by our Board for climate-related matters and meets at least four times a year:
•	 Our newly established ESG Steering Committee oversees the delivery of our ESG strategy, 
which includes reviewing progress against our climate-related goals and targets. It is also 
responsible for sharing information and expertise with our Audit Committee and Risk Committee 
to support them with their climate-related responsibilities.
•	 Our Audit Committee reviews the effectiveness of our risk management and our climate-related 
assurance across the Group.
•	 Our Risk Committee supports the Group in identifying and managing climate-related risks 
and opportunities.
•	 Our Remuneration Committee aligns our remuneration policies with our strategic objectives. 
Our strategic objectives, which form 20% of the incentive opportunity for our Executive Directors 
and Senior Leadership Team, include a specific objective on sustainability.
Our sustainability and climate 
governance framework is shown 
on page 36.
See our Directors’ Remuneration 
Report on pages 82 to 94 
for more information on our 
Executive Directors’ incentive 
opportunity.
46
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Strategy
Recommendation 
Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, 
and financial planning where such information is material.
Recommended disclosure
A) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium and long term.
Summary
Reference
	
— We have continued to use these timeframes: short (FY2024-FY2029), medium (FY2030-FY2049) 
and long term (FY2050+) to assess our climate-related risks and opportunities. Our short-term 
period aligns with our five-year plan. Our medium- and long-term time periods align with our ESG 
strategy, which includes Net Zero emissions targets and our climate transition plans.
	
— Our FY2023 climate modelling identified our manufacturing and major inventory-holding sites that 
are considered at ‘high’ risk of physical climate-related risks under varying warming scenarios and 
timescales. Regardless of warming scenario or timescale, the risk of river flooding was ‘high’ at four 
of our sites. Four of our sites in the APAC region are also considered ‘highly’ exposed to chronic 
climate risks.
	
— This year, we used the same modelling to improve our understanding of climate-related risks in our 
supply chain, reviewing 130 of our suppliers. The modelling showed that 32% of those suppliers 
are considered at ‘high’ risk for at least one of the climate-related physical risks that we assessed.
	
— In FY2023, we completed transitional climate scenario analysis with all our product divisions using 
the International Energy Agency 1.5 ºC warming pathway. This helped us identify several climate-
related technology and legal trends that we believe represent opportunities for our business in the 
medium to long term: the shift from ICE vehicle production to EVs, growth in the use of additive 
manufacturing technologies, and increasing carbon taxation.
	
— This year, we worked with representatives from our three sales regions to enhance our processes 
for identifying climate-related risks and opportunities. We considered the impact that the identified 
risks and opportunities could have in their specific geographies and sectors. We concluded that 
the risks and opportunities already identified were representative across their regions and shared 
insights with our Group functions to help them continue to develop our strategic response.
	
— In FY2023, we completed transitional climate scenario analysis for all our product divisions using 
the International Energy Agency 1.5 ºC warming pathway. This helped us identify several climate-
related technology and legal trends that we believe represent opportunities for our business in the 
medium to long term. These are explained in the table below with further detail on our website.
For more information on the 
assumptions included in our 
transitional climate scenario 
analysis pathway, see 
www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-
roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-
keep-the-15-0c-goal-in-reach.
An expanded table covering 
our climate-related risks and 
opportunities and our definition 
of ‘high’ risk for the physical risks 
assessed are available on our 
website at www.renishaw.com/
en/climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
Find more information on 
the processes we use to 
identify climate-related risks 
and opportunities in our 
Risk management report 
on pages 11 to 18.
Key: the percentage of the Group’s revenue associated with climate-related trends 
  Low: < 3%
  Medium: 3-10%
  High: >10%
Climate-related trend
Technology – development of Additive Manufacturing (AM)
We believe that AM is becoming a more mainstream option for volume manufacturing. External forecasts predict a 20% growth in the AM market by 
2030 and we believe that environmental sustainability will be a key driver for this growth.
Potential velocity under a 1.5 ºC pathway
Current state 
FY2024-FY2029 (short term)  
FY2030-FY2049 (medium term) 
FY2050+ (long term)  
Technology – transaction from manufacturing internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs)
The transition to EVs is creating new processes, assembly plants, supply chains, research and customers, which offers significant opportunities for 
all our relevant products. 
Potential velocity under a 1.5 ºC pathway
Current state 
FY2024-FY2029 (short term)  
FY2030-FY2049 (medium term) 
FY2050+ (long term)  
Policy and legal – increasing carbon taxation
Carbon taxation will affect us globally. In the short-term, we have had to dedicate time to reporting under the European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border 
Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). While our exposure has been low, CBAM could create risks by increasing costs in our supply chains, which may 
be passed on to us. However, we believe that carbon taxation could ultimately create more opportunity for us. It may act as a driving force for 
increased use of metrology to reduce manufacturing process variation and scrap, driven by the high cost and carbon impact of materials. 
Potential velocity under a 1.5 ºC pathway
Current state 
FY2024-FY2029 (short term)  
FY2030-FY2049 (medium term) 
FY2050+ (long term)  
47
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Climate-related Financial Disclosures statement continued
Strategy continued
Recommendation 
Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, 
and financial planning where such information is material.
Recommended disclosure
B) Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning.
Summary
Reference
	
— In FY2023, we identified that 37% of the ‘asset value’1 of our manufacturing and major inventory-
holding sites is considered at ‘high’ risk of flooding and that 8% of ‘asset value’ has ‘high’ exposure 
to various chronic climate risks.
	
— To demonstrate the impact of these risks and how we are managing them in our strategic and 
financial planning, we reviewed the financial costs to our business of an actual flood that affected 
our manufacturing site in Woodchester, UK, in 2007. The factory was inundated with 100 mm of 
flood water and our insurance claim was more than £0.3m for building repairs and stock loss. 
The site returned to full production within five days and during that time we were able to redirect 
stock held in our subsidiaries to cover the shortfall in production.
	
— We also assessed the impact of losing our manufacturing site in Pune, India, as a result of wildfire, 
because it is our site with the greatest asset value that currently faces ‘high’ exposure to various 
chronic climate risks. In this scenario, our immediate ability to produce the volume of cables and 
tool-setting arms we need would be affected. We would mitigate this potential impact through our 
stock contingency, ramping up sourcing from our other established supply chains and drawing on 
our experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic to quickly reinstate production in our other 
manufacturing locations. 
	
— We have begun considering climate risk within our procurement strategy, focusing on assessing 
suppliers that are more at risk of disrupting our supply of goods due to factors such as weak 
financial health, political uncertainty, or exclusive sourcing status, and that would also have 
a significant effect on business revenue in the event of supply chain failure. If these suppliers are 
also rated as ‘high’ risk for physical climate risks, we will investigate the best mitigation actions with 
them to ensure continuity of supply. 
	
— Our transitional climate-related risk and opportunity analysis informed this year’s work to refresh 
our five-year plan. We have also included capital expenditure estimates related to achieving our 
Net Zero targets in the plan.
	
— Our assessment of transitional climate risks and opportunities shows that we are well positioned 
to benefit from a transition to a low-carbon economy. While we have identified risks to our business, 
our financial analysis indicates these risks are outweighed significantly by the opportunities that 
we can capitalise on.
	
— We have continued to develop our climate transition plans, which describes our Net Zero targets 
and our strategy for successfully transitioning to the low-carbon economy. The plans include the 
dependencies that their success rely on that are outside of our control.
See our climate transition plans 
on pages 37 to 40.
An expanded table covering 
our climate-related risks and 
opportunities and our strategic 
response is available on our 
website at www.renishaw.com/
en/climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
1	 ‘Asset value’ includes i) land and buildings (with buildings included at insured reinstatement value), ii) other fixed assets (at net book value), 
iii) inventory (at Group cost), at 31 March 2023.
48
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Strategy continued
Recommendation 
Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, 
and financial planning where such information is material.
Recommended disclosure
C) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, 
including a 2°C or lower scenario.
Summary
Reference
	
— We have assessed physical climate risks at our manufacturing and major inventory-holding sites 
as well as 130 of our important suppliers using climate modelling that covered 1.5 ºC, 2 ºC to 3 ºC 
and 4 ºC warming pathways across current day, 2030, 2050 and 2100 time horizons. We included 
multiple warming pathways to address the inherent uncertainty created by climate modelling over 
those time horizons.
	
— For our own sites, the climate modelling indicated that the sites at ‘high’ physical risk remained 
mostly static when compared to our current risk exposure. Only one further site was considered 
at ‘high’ risk for river flooding under the various time horizons, warming pathways and risk factors.
	
— We believe we have the capacity to adjust our business strategy if these physical risks become 
more extreme and frequent. We have invested in flood defences and early warning systems 
at our ‘high’ flood risk UK manufacturing sites and are also duplicating important parts of our 
manufacturing processes at lower flood risk sites. Two of our ‘high’ risk sites in APAC have short-
term leases (three to five years), which gives us the flexibility to change where we are based 
if climate change has a significant adverse effect on our business at these locations. For the 
remaining ‘high’ risk site that we own in Shanghai, China, we have a significant physical network 
of sites established in other areas of the country that could serve our markets in the event of 
a disruption.
	
— For the suppliers assessed, there is little variation in risk exposure across warming scenarios or 
timescales. Most suppliers identified as being ‘high’ risk in these instances are already considered 
to be ‘high’ risk currently.
	
— We believe we have resilient supplier risk management processes that would minimise the impacts of 
supply chain disruption caused by climate-related risks. We are incorporating the climate modelling 
outputs into our supplier risk assessment process, which means that climate risks are considered 
as part of our overall assessment of supplier risk. For suppliers who are considered ‘high’ risk in this 
assessment, we maintain a proportionate level of safety stock and where appropriate establish 
reliable secondary supplier relationships. Our ability to adapt these controls has been successfully 
tested in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic and helped ensure overall business continuity.
	
— In FY2023, we analysed our transitional risks and opportunities using a 1.5 ºC warming pathway 
to assess potential likelihood and financial/strategic impact. We continued this work in FY2024 to 
expand our understanding of risks and opportunities, but we continue to believe that each climate-
related trend disclosed represents an opportunity for our business, and could be associated with 
3-10% of our potential revenue by FY2029. This could increase to more than 10% for each climate-
related trend in the medium to long term under a 1.5 ºC pathway.
	
— We believe our corporate strategy is robust and considers the potential impacts of these climate-
related trends. Our strategy will continue to be informed by the work we are doing to identify, 
assess and manage our climate-related risks and opportunities.
More information on how we 
complete our climate scenario 
analysis is available at 
www.renishaw.com/en/
climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
49
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
Climate-related Financial Disclosures statement continued
Risk management 
Recommendation 
Disclose how the organisation identifies, assesses, and manages climate-related risks.
Recommended disclosure
A)	Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
Summary
Reference
	
— We use a combination of ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ processes, which includes our physical and 
transitional climate scenario analysis to assess our climate-related risks and opportunities across 
our value chain.
	
— Our Risk Committee has reviewed and challenged the output of these processes to help us 
estimate the likelihood and potential impact of the risks and opportunities identified.
	
— Our ESG Steering Committee is responsible for assessing our climate-related risks and 
opportunities and recommending actions to the wider business to help mitigate our risks and 
capitalise on our opportunities.
	
— We have expanded our climate-related risk assessment processes to cover our supply chain and 
have engaged with more of our regional colleagues to get a broader assessment of our climate-
related risks and opportunities.
We explain how we identify 
and manage our risks in our 
Risk management report on 
pages 11 to 18.
More information on how we 
have identified and assessed 
our transitional risks and 
opportunities and physical risks 
is available on our website 
www.renishaw.com/en/
climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
B) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks.
Summary
Reference
	
— This year, we improved the way we manage our climate-related risks and opportunities by 
creating a climate risk register that details our controls and how they link to our principal risks 
and ESG strategy.
	
— We have identified owners for each of these controls who are accountable for ensuring that the 
controls are relevant and maintained, and that related actions are completed by the deadlines set 
out in the climate risk register.
More information on how we 
manage our climate-related risks 
and opportunities can be found 
on page 11 to 13 and on our 
website www.renishaw.com/en/
climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
C) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the 
organisation’s overall risk management.
Summary
Reference
	
— We have integrated our management of specific elements related to climate risk within the 
relevant principal risks including innovation strategy, competitor activity, non-compliance with 
laws and regulations.
	
— We have continued to integrate climate-related risks and opportunities into our risk management 
framework, with our Risk Committee and Audit Committee reviewing the proposed principal risks 
and recommending these to the Board for approval.
Read our Risk management 
report on pages 11 to 18.
Find more information on how 
we are integrating climate change 
risks and opportunities into other 
principal risks on page 11.
50
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Metrics and targets 
Recommendation 
Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information 
is material.
Recommended disclosure
A) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and 
risk management process.
Summary
Reference
	
— We have disclosed cross-industry TCFD metrics used to manage our climate-related risks and 
opportunities. These metrics cover:
•	 Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions (pages 38 to 39);
•	 energy use (page 41);
•	 climate-related executive management remuneration (page 89);
•	 potential revenue associated with climate-related trends (page 47);
•	 assets and suppliers considered at ‘high’ risk to physical climate-related risks (pages 48); and
•	 capital expenditure towards achieving Net Zero for Scope 1 and 2 emissions (page 38). 
	
— While we have not yet introduced a carbon price into our business, we are taking steps towards it. 
To date, we have established a financial modelling process and obtained more supplier-specific 
and industry-average data for almost all our purchased goods and services and calculated 
emissions from the use of sold products.
We explain how we identify 
and manage our risks in our 
Risk management report 
on pages 11 to 18.
More information on how we 
have identified and assessed 
our transitional risks and 
opportunities and physical risks 
is available on our website 
www.renishaw.com/en/
climate-related-risks-and-
opportunities--48236.
B) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks.
Summary
Reference
	
— Our emissions this year have been externally assured by the British Standards Institute as accurate, 
materially correct and a fair representation of GHG data and information. Our emissions were:
•	 Scope 1: 4,347 tCO2e.
•	 Scope 2 (market-based): 90 tCO2e.
•	 Scope 2 (location-based): 9,035 tCO2e.
•	 Scope 3: 131,870 tCO2e.
A more detailed breakdown of 
our Scope 3 emissions into the 
15 GHG Protocol emission 
categories and their calculation 
methodologies and our ISO 
14064 external assurance 
opinion are available on our 
website www.renishaw.com/en/
our-emissions--48235.
C) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance 
against targets.
Summary
Reference
	
— Our Net Zero targets have been validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as in line 
with the 2015 Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rise to well-below 2 ºC. The targets, 
all set against our FY2020 baseline, are to:
•	 achieve Net Zero in Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, which is an absolute 90% reduction 
compared to baseline emissions by FY2028;
•	 achieve an absolute 50% reduction in Scope 3 GHG emissions by FY2030; and
•	 achieve Net Zero across all Scopes by 2050, which is an absolute 90% reduction compared 
to baseline GHG emissions.
	
— We will also invest in credible nature-based or technological carbon removal programmes to 
address the remaining 10% of our GHG emissions.
	
— The strategic objectives for the FY2024 annual incentive opportunity for our Executive Directors 
and Senior Leadership Team included:
•	 submitting our Net Zero targets to SBTi; and
•	 publishing goals and creating a five-to-ten-year plan using the SBTi framework, and tracking first 
year of progress.
Our climate transition plans 
demonstrate our roadmap for 
achieving our Net Zero targets 
on pages 37 to 40. 
Our Directors’ Remuneration 
Policy and strategic objectives 
are expanded further on 
page 89.
51
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
STRATEGIC REPORT

Strategic report
We are required by sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006 to include in our Annual Report certain non-financial 
and sustainability information. The table below shows where this information can be found in this Report.
Our business model is set out on page 10 and our non-financial KPIs are disclosed on page 22.
Reporting 
requirement(s)
Further information
Policies
Related principal risk(s)
Climate-related 
financial 
disclosures
	
— Climate-related Financial Disclosures 
statement (pages 46 to 51)
	
— n/a
	
— Innovation strategy (page 15)
	
— Competitor activity (page 16)
	
— Non-compliance with laws 
and regulations (page 17)
	
— Supply chain dependencies 
(page 18)
Environmental 
matters
	
— ESG review – Environment 
(pages 37 to 41)
	
— Section 172 statement (page 65)
	
— Group Environmental Data Policy 
	
— Group Management of Waste Policy
	
— Code of Conduct
	
— Innovation strategy (page 15)
	
— Competitor activity (page 16)
	
— Non-compliance with laws 
and regulations (page 17)
	
— Supply chain dependencies 
(page 18)
Our employees
	
— How we engage with stakeholders 
(page 23)
	
— ESG review – Social (pages 42 to 44)
	
— Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report (page 61)
	
— Section 172 statement (pages 65 to 66)
	
— Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures (page 96)
	
— Equality, Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy
	
— Speak Up Policy
	
— Group Occupational Health 
and Safety Policy
	
— Code of Conduct
	
— People (page 17)
Social matters
	
— How we engage with stakeholders 
(pages 23 to 25)
	
— ESG review – Social (pages 42 to 44)
	
— Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report (pages 60 to 61)
	
— Section 172 statement (pages 65 to 66)
	
— Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures (page 97)
	
— Equality, Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy
	
— Speak Up Policy 
	
— Group Occupational Health 
and Safety Policy
	
— Code of Conduct
	
— People (page 17)
	
— Supply chain dependencies 
(page 18)
Respect for 
human rights
	
— How we engage with stakeholders 
(page 25)
	
— ESG review – Social (page 44)
	
— Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report (page 61)
	
— Group Modern Slavery and 
Human Trafficking Policy
	
— Equality, Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy
	
— Speak Up Policy 
	
— Code of Conduct
	
— People (page 17)
	
— Non-compliance with laws 
and regulations (page 17)
Anti-corruption 
and anti-bribery
	
— ESG – Governance (page 45)
	
— Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report (page 61)
	
— Section 172 statement (page 66)
	
— Group Anti-Bribery and 
Corruption Policy
	
— Gifts and Hospitality Policy
	
— Code of Conduct
	
— Non-compliance with laws 
and regulations (page 17)
Section 172 statement
Our Section 172 statement on pages 64 to 66 describes how the Directors have had regard to stakeholders’ interests and other 
matters when discharging Directors’ duties set out in Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006. It includes examples of how 
stakeholders’ interests were considered during principal decisions taken during the year. Details of our engagement with 
stakeholders are in the How we engage with stakeholders section on pages 23 to 25.
The Strategic Report on pages 2 to 52 was approved by the Board on 11 September 2024 and signed on its behalf by:
Sir David Grant 
Interim Non-executive Chairman
52
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
Non-financial and sustainability information statement

54	
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report
56	
Board of Directors
58	
Executive Committee
64	
Section 172 statement
70	
Nomination Committee Report
76	
Audit Committee Report
82	
Directors’ Remuneration Report
95	
Other statutory and regulatory disclosures
99	
Directors’ responsibilities
Governance Report
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
53

Governance Report
54
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
The Board and the Executive Committee have worked hard to 
maintain and build upon a resilient and sustainable governance 
framework, which we believe makes us stronger and better 
placed to take sound decisions in the interests of the Company 
and its stakeholders. We introduced a new Code of Conduct in 
November 2023, and a global implementation programme is 
being rolled out as we continue to embed an appropriate culture; 
see more on page 45.
With sustainability becoming increasingly important across 
Renishaw in the past few years, I am particularly pleased to 
see our plans maturing during FY2024. That includes approving 
our new ESG strategy and establishing a new ESG Steering 
Committee to oversee progress and ensure the appropriate 
level of governance. We provide more details in our ESG review 
on pages 35 to 45.
A summary of the Board’s activities during the year and its 
principal decisions can be found on pages 64 to 66.
Risk management and sustainability
Regular reporting has provided the Board and its Committees 
with information to help guide management in responding to 
the events of the year, as well as to monitor our principal risks. 
These are more fully described on pages 11 to 18. 
Stakeholders
I was pleased to be able to speak with a number of our largest 
institutional investors on the subject of the significant votes 
against, received at the 2023 AGM. These conversations 
provided us with a better understanding of our shareholders’ 
priorities and we held constructive discussions regarding our 
corporate governance arrangements; see more in the How we 
engage with stakeholders section of the Strategic Report on 
page 23.
You will read on pages 64 to 66 about how we consider the 
views of our stakeholders in our decision-making process. 
Our engagement with stakeholders, including our people, 
provides the Board with enhanced context and background 
when making decisions. Further information on our stakeholder 
engagement can be found on pages 23 to 25 and in our 
Section 172 statement on pages 64 to 66. 
We held our Board strategy day in March 2024 at our 
Woodchester, UK, site. To supplement our strategy discussions, 
we took the opportunity to meet many of our people based on 
the site and the visit provided us with valuable insights into the 
experiences of our manufacturing colleagues.
The year in review 
I am pleased to introduce the Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report for the year ended 30 June 2024. This section focuses 
on the Company’s governance structures, the work of the 
Board and its Committees and how we comply with the UK’s 
Corporate Governance Code 2018 (Governance Code), and 
other regulatory requirements. The Board welcomes and supports 
the publication of the 2024 UK Corporate Governance Code 
and is working towards reflecting the revisions it contains into 
its processes and procedures.
Our Committee responsibilities are clear and well managed 
by individual Committee Chairs, and we are in the process 
of updating and refreshing terms of reference and standing 
agendas for all Committees. Some of these changes are in 
anticipation of changes in UK governance standards; for 
example, we are updating and refreshing our approach to risk 
management. You can read about this in more detail in the 
Audit Committee Report (see pages 76 to 81). Such changes 
are an essential part of maintaining a robust governance 
framework on an ongoing basis.
A significant change to the Company’s governance 
arrangements took place with effect from 1 July 2024, with 
Sir David McMurtry stepping down from his role as Executive 
Chairman. I would like to thank Sir David for his strong leadership 
of the Company and we are delighted that we will retain the 
benefit of his vast knowledge and experience with him remaining 
on the Board as a Non-executive Director. I assumed the role of 
Interim Non-executive Chairman of the Board from that date. We 
were also pleased to welcome Richard McMurtry to the Board 
as a Non-executive Director, also with effect from 1 July 2024. 
Richard trained as an engineer, with significant experience 
in product development and robotic systems.
The Board’s focus on supporting management’s disciplined 
delivery of our strategy has remained strong in an environment 
of international geopolitical challenges which the Board has 
recognised and responded to throughout the year.
A key Board focus area was a review of our long-term strategic 
ambition and value creation model, and the annual review of our 
five-year plan in this context. To support our strategy and help 
strengthen our links with the investment community, we also 
appointed Peel Hunt as joint corporate broker; please see 
page 65 for more information. 
Directors’ Corporate 
Governance Report

55
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
Looking forward 
Looking ahead, the Board’s priorities in FY2025 will focus upon 
the following:
	
— continuing to support the Group’s growth plans by oversight 
of its three key strategic focus areas; 
	
— appointing a new independent Non-executive Chair and 
continuing to consider succession plans, including Non-
executive Director recruitment;
	
— increased engagement with investors;
	
— keeping the talent pipeline under review at Executive 
Committee level and one level below;
	
— ESG and climate change;
	
— the UK government’s audit and governance reforms and 
ensuring compliance with the new Governance Code. We will 
continue to oversee management’s key activities and timeline 
in this area; and
	
— improving our diversity across all levels of the business.
The progress we have made this year has provided us with 
a sound platform from which we look forward with confidence. 
The 2024 AGM will be held on 27 November 2024 and I look 
forward to meeting many of you then.
Sir David Grant
Interim Non-executive Chairman
11 September 2024
Board composition
We have also continued to progress succession planning 
with more appointments to add to those made in FY2022. 
We welcomed Professor Dame Karen Holford as an 
Independent Non-executive Director on 1 September 2023. 
Dame Karen’s appointment further enhances the breadth of 
experience of the Board, with her background in engineering 
and research and development, and higher education, as well 
as her strong interest in broadening the diversity of people who 
have engineering careers. From 1 July 2024, we also welcomed 
Richard McMurtry as an additional Non-executive Director. 
Richard is a highly experienced director of various businesses 
and an investor who supports start-up companies committed to 
developing the future of innovation in the UK. He trained as an 
engineer with significant involvement in product development 
and robotic systems. Further information on our Board’s skills 
and experience can be found on pages 56 to 57. 
Board performance review
This year, we conducted an internal Board and Committee 
performance review. The Board and Committees continue to 
perform effectively with clear terms of reference, appropriate 
agendas and a good balance of support and challenge. 
Details of the performance review, including the areas identified 
for improvement and the progress made against last year’s 
actions, can be found in the Nomination Committee Report 
on pages 70 to 75. 
Diversity and inclusion
The diversity of background, skills and experience of our 
Board is key to its strong performance. As reported in FY2022, 
in October 2021 the Board approved our global Equality, 
Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Policy. We updated this in FY2023 to 
include, in particular, the responsibilities of the Board in relation 
to EDI, and to reflect the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) 
requirements in terms of the diversity considerations that should 
apply at Board and Board Committee level. The appointment of 
Professor Dame Karen Holford increases the diversity on the Board, 
in line with the Company’s ambitions outlined in the EDI Policy.

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
	
	
N* 
Sir David McMurtry
Non-executive Director1
John Deer 
Non-executive Deputy Chairman 
Sir David Grant 
Interim Non-executive Chairman2
Date appointed to the Board
September 1975 (Executive Chairman 
from September 1975 to June 2024)
Date appointed to the Board 
July 1974 (Executive Deputy Chairman 
from July 1974 to January 2020)
Date appointed to the Board 
April 2012 (Senior Independent Director from 
October 2013 to June 2024)
Areas of expertise 
Strategy, product development, 
engineering, science/technology
Areas of expertise
Manufacturing, strategy, international 
development and operations
Areas of expertise 
Engineering, people, science/technology
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Co-founder of Renishaw, has provided 
strong leadership to the Board, and 
been responsible for Group innovation, 
product strategy and Group technology.
	
— Significant contribution to the long-term, 
sustainable success of the Company 
and all aspects of the business.
	
— Strategic vision, and technical and 
industry knowledge.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Co-founder of Renishaw, contributes 
to Board leadership and strategic 
decisions for growing the business.
	
— Extensive manufacturing and quality 
experience contributes to the delivery 
of efficient, high-quality manufacturing.
	
— Strategic vision, and commercial and 
international experience.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Various previous leadership positions 
at international engineering companies 
and government-related science and 
technology bodies.
	
— Extensive engineering experience 
and recognised for his contributions 
to industry.
	
— Contributes to talent recruitment, 
increasing diversity and development 
of workforce.
External appointments 
None
External appointments 
None
External appointments 
None
	
	
A   N   R*
Will Lee 
Chief Executive
Allen Roberts 
Group Finance Director 
Catherine Glickman 
Independent Non-executive Director
Date appointed to the Board 
August 2016 (Group Sales and Marketing 
Director from August 2016 to February 2018)
Date appointed to the Board 
October 1980
Date appointed to the Board 
August 2018
Areas of expertise
Sales and marketing, strategy, 
engineering, operations
Areas of expertise 
Finance, strategy, internal controls, 
operations, compliance
Areas of expertise
People, remuneration, pensions, strategy
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Effective and strong leadership and 
management, both technical and 
commercial, with an acute awareness 
of the industry and its opportunities 
and challenges.
	
— Maintains a wide breadth of knowledge, 
as well as strong stakeholder relationships 
that continue to develop the business.
	
— Joined the Renishaw graduate scheme 
in 1996 and since then has held various 
senior management positions in 
engineering, operations, and sales 
and marketing, resulting in an in-depth 
understanding of the Group’s business, 
products and markets.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Chartered accountant, with an 
invaluable contribution to financial 
planning and strategy, including adept 
management of financial risks and 
business development.
	
— Deep understanding of the Group’s 
businesses, products, relationships and 
the sectors in which Renishaw operates.
	
— Experienced in the management of 
financial risks, reporting and planning.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Breadth of human resources experience 
in other listed companies is particularly 
valued by the Board.
	
— Skilled at developing reward structures 
that align leadership motivation with 
Group strategy.
	
— Extensive HR, remuneration and 
pensions experience, as well as previous 
international experience with Genus plc 
and Tesco plc.
External appointments 
None
External appointments 
None
External appointments 
	
— Non-executive director and remuneration 
committee chair of TheWorks.co.uk plc3.
	
— Non-executive director of East of England 
Ambulance Service NHS Trust.
Board of Directors
56
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

	
A*   N   R
	
A   N   R
	
A   N   R
Juliette Stacey
Independent Non-executive Director
Stephen Wilson 
Independent Non-executive Director
Professor Dame Karen Holford 
Independent Non-executive Director
Date appointed to the Board
January 2022
Date appointed to the Board 
June 2022
Date appointed to the Board
September 2023
Areas of expertise 
Finance, M&A, strategy, corporate 
governance, internal controls, compliance
Areas of expertise
Software, finance, strategy, business 
development, IT transformation, 
international development
Areas of expertise
Engineering, research and development, 
science/technology, people and diversity
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Chartered accountant with an in-
depth understanding of finance, 
M&A and strategy.
	
— Career experience in finance, as well 
as executive roles in both listed and 
non-listed company environments.
	
— Roles as chair of audit committees at 
other listed companies brings a wider 
industry perspective.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Extensive experience in the software 
sector, including strategic, financial 
and business development and 
IT transformation.
	
— Career experience in finance and 
business development, including 
in global businesses.
	
— Executive and non-executive roles 
in listed company environments.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Engineering experience across industry 
and higher education.
	
— Leadership and strategic advisory 
positions, including within government-
related science and technology bodies.
	
— Skilled at advancing diversity in 
the workforce.
External appointments 
	
— Senior independent director and audit 
committee chair of Fuller, Smith & Turner plc.
	
— Non-executive director and audit 
committee chair of Sanderson Design 
Group plc.
	
— Non-executive director of Hardwicke 
Investments Limited.
	
— Non-executive director and audit 
committee chair of Willmott Dixon 
Holdings Limited.
External appointments 
	
— Non-executive director and 
audit committee chair of Canonical 
Holdings Ltd.
External appointments 
	
— Chief executive and vice chancellor 
of Cranfield University.
	
	
Richard McMurtry 
Non-executive Director
Kasim Hussain
Group General Counsel & 
Company Secretary
Date appointed to the Board 
July 2024
Appointed 
July 2024
Areas of expertise 
Engineering, robotics, product development
Areas of expertise 
Risk, compliance, corporate 
governance and M&A
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Highly experienced director of 
various businesses.
	
— Career experience in overseeing and 
developing the future of innovation.
	
— Trained as an engineer with significant 
involvement in product development 
and robotic systems.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Adviser to the Board and senior 
leadership on all matters of risk 
and governance. 
	
— Responsible for leading the global 
Legal, Compliance and Company 
Secretarial teams.
	
— Specialist in M&A and strategy.
	
— Substantial experience in 
a listed environment.
External appointments 
None
External appointments 
None
A 	 Audit Committee
N 	 Nomination Committee
R 	 Remuneration Committee
* 	 Committee Chair 
Board of Directors as at 11 September 2024
	 Read more extensive Board biographies 
online at www.renishaw.com/directors
Former officers who held office during FY2024
Jacqueline Conway 
General Counsel & Company Secretary
Appointed November 2019 (on sabbatical from 
April to October 2023) Resigned October 2023
Karen Atterbury 
Interim Company Secretary
Appointed April 2023 Resigned July 2024
1	 Sir David McMurtry was a member and chair of the 
Nomination Committee until 30 June 2024 when he 
stepped down from his role as Executive Chairman.
2	 Sir David Grant was a member of both the Audit 
and Remuneration Committees until 30 June 2024 
when he assumed the role of Interim Non-Executive 
Chairman.
3	 On 1 August 2024, Catherine Glickman announced 
her intention to step down from her position at 
TheWorks.co.uk plc, which will be effective from 
31 October 2024.
57
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
Executive Committee
Dave Wallace 
Group Operations Director
Gareth Hankins
Group Manufacturing Director
Diane Canadine 
Group Human Resources Director
Appointed January 2008
Appointed February 2018
Appointed October 2023
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Responsible for Group Operations, 
with oversight of our centralised Group 
Commercial Development teams, 
Group Quality, Group Compliance, our 
centralised Group Engineering teams, 
Group IT and Security, and Group 
Intellectual Property.
	
— Deep insight into Renishaw’s products, 
markets and product development, 
as well as strong management skills.
	
— Has worked in various functions of the 
business, including as Director and 
General Manager for the CMM Products 
Division, and previously held Executive 
Committee responsibility for the 
Industrial Metrology business.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Responsible for manufacturing 
operations, procurement, facilities 
management and sustainability across 
the Group. 
	
— Skilled leader with acute insight into 
operations and manufacturing.
	
— Experience in engineering, production, 
and operations and business 
management, including previous role 
as Operations Manager for styli and 
custom products.
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Responsible for overseeing the 
implementation of our wide-reaching 
people strategy and developing our 
network of overseas HR teams.
	
— Experienced leader of HR transformation.
	
— Previous senior roles across retail and 
healthcare sectors.
	
Marc Saunders 
Director of Group Strategic Development
Appointed April 2024
Contribution, skills and experience
	
— Responsible for Group strategy, 
financial planning and analysis, 
investor relations and communications 
to internal and external stakeholders.
	
— Experienced leader of strategic 
planning processes for listed 
businesses.
	
— Has worked in various technical, 
commercial and corporate functions 
at Renishaw, including leadership of 
Additive Manufacturing applications, 
UK Sales and Group Marketing.
Will Lee* (Chair)
Chief Executive
See page 56 for biography
Allen Roberts* 
Group Finance Director
See page 56 for biography
Kasim Hussain 
Group General Counsel & Company 
Secretary
See page 57 for biography
*These members of the Executive 
Committee were also Board Directors 
during FY2024.
58
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
Former Executive Committee members 
who held office during FY2024
Jacqueline Conway 
General Counsel & Company Secretary
Resigned October 2023
Leo Somerville
President, Americas
Resigned January 2024
Sir David McMurtry*
Non-executive Director
Resigned June 2024

Reporting against the Governance Code
To avoid duplication in this report, the table below cross-references 
explanations given elsewhere of how we have sought to apply 
the principles and comply with the provisions of the Governance 
Code. We report against other relevant Governance Code 
principles and provisions within this Directors’ Corporate 
Governance Report.
Topic
Page(s)
Company purpose
IFC
Values
23, 60
Workforce engagement
23, 43, 61
Other stakeholder engagement
24 to 25
Strategy and business model
7 to 10
Effective controls
68 to 69
Sustainability
35 to 52
Capital allocation
28
Workforce policies and practices
42 to 44, 52
Risk management
11 to 18
Scope of disclosures
In this Corporate Governance Report, we have incorporated:
	
— the Audit Committee Report (page 76);
	
— the Nomination Committee Report (page 70); and
	
— the Directors’ Remuneration Report (page 82).
This report is structured in accordance with the five sections of 
the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (Governance Code) 
and we describe how we have applied its principles. 
The Governance Code can be viewed at www.frc.org.uk.
We report on the operation of our business in the following ways:
The Group’s business and likely future developments
The Chairman’s statement (pages 2 to 3), the Chief Executive’s 
review (pages 4 to 6) and other sections of the Strategic Report 
give a review of the Group’s business and likely future 
developments. Results are also reported by operating segment 
in Note 2 to the Financial statements, together with an analysis of 
revenue by geographical market.
Management Report
The Strategic Report includes a management report, as required 
by the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and 
Transparency Rules (DTR).
Directors’ Report
The Directors’ Corporate Governance Report and Other statutory 
and regulatory disclosures as set out on pages 95 to 97 together 
form the Directors’ Report. The Company has chosen to include 
matters in the Strategic Report that are required to be included in 
the Directors’ Report. These are cross-referred to in the Directors’ 
Corporate Governance Report and Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures as applicable, and are incorporated by reference 
into the Directors’ Report.
Corporate Governance Report
The Company’s corporate governance practices are set out in 
the Directors’ Corporate Governance Report (on pages 54 to 69), 
which forms part of the Directors’ Report, as required by the DTR.
Shareholder information
Certain information, which the FCA’s UK Listing Rules (UKLR) 
require that the Company provides to its shareholders, 
is contained in the Directors’ Corporate Governance 
Report (pages 54 to 69), the Directors’ Remuneration 
Report (pages 82 to 94), and Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures (pages 95 to 97). This includes information 
relating to arrangements with controlling shareholders.
59
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
Stakeholder engagement, including the AGM
Shareholders
The AGM takes place at the Company’s headquarters or one of 
its other main sites, and we send our shareholders appropriate 
advance notice of the meeting. The Chief Executive and other 
nominated presenters give presentations on the business, 
and the Chairs of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination 
Committees are available for questions during and after 
the meeting.
At our 2023 AGM, we were pleased to see higher attendance 
numbers again compared to our 2022 AGM, and the Board 
greatly appreciated the opportunity to speak with more of the 
Company’s shareholders. Due to positive feedback from the 
wider investor community, we have kept the Q&A facility, 
which was first introduced at the 2020 AGM. This allows the 
Company’s shareholders to submit questions via email before 
the proxy voting deadline and also helps them to engage with 
the Board, even when they are not able to attend the AGM. 
Details of this year’s AGM can be found in the Notice of 
Annual General Meeting.
Each year, different resolutions are proposed for each 
substantially separate issue, and all resolutions are taken on 
a poll. We report on the number of votes lodged in respect of 
each resolution, the balance for and against each resolution, 
and the number of votes withheld. This information is published 
via a Regulatory Information Service (RIS) and on our website 
following the meeting.
At the 2023 AGM, the Board was again pleased that the 
majority of resolutions were passed with a high level of support 
from the Company’s shareholders. In accordance with the 
Governance Code, the Board considered the votes against 
resolutions 5, the re-election of Sir David McMurtry (31.27%) 
and 6, the re-election of John Deer (28.48%). In order to better 
understand the reasons for these votes against, the Board 
reviewed the voting recommendations of relevant proxy voting 
agencies, where these had been made available. Following the 
AGM, Sir David Grant wrote to the Company’s largest 
institutional shareholders which voted against these resolutions 
and those proxy advisory firms which recommended doing so, 
inviting them to discuss their concerns with him in his then role 
as Senior Independent Director. 
The Board was pleased that more responses to this invitation 
were received this year than last year, and constructive 
discussions were held between Sir David Grant, Karen Atterbury, 
then Interim Company Secretary, and five of our largest 
institutional shareholders. These discussions provided the Board 
with a greater insight into shareholders’ concerns, as well as 
providing shareholders with a greater appreciation of Renishaw’s 
position. From these discussions, it was clear that although many 
of our stakeholders have an understanding and appreciation of 
Renishaw’s unique history and culture, some of the Company’s 
governance arrangements do not reflect the expectations of some 
investors. Particular matters of note included the absence of a 
relationship agreement between the founders and the Company, 
diversity and succession planning. Sir David provided feedback 
on these conversations to the Board. The Company published 
an update as required under the Governance Code in May 2024. 
1 Board leadership and 
Company purpose
Purpose, values and culture
Renishaw’s purpose of Transforming Tomorrow Together, as well 
as its values of innovation, inspiration, integrity and involvement, 
help guide the Board and our people when making decisions. 
These principles will help Renishaw grow and evolve without 
losing focus on what is important. 
A strong culture is needed to ensure Renishaw can achieve 
its purpose. The Board is responsible for monitoring and 
assessing culture. The Chairman sets the culture for the Board, 
promoting openness and debate. This informs the culture that 
the Chief Executive embeds throughout the business with the 
support of the Directors. 
In November 2023, we launched our new Code of Conduct 
(Code). This is a global guide on how to do business 
responsibly, addressing issues that might arise for our 
stakeholders. It is aligned with our core values, acts as a top-
level summary of our key policies, and sets out how we expect 
our employees, and other key stakeholders, to act in their daily 
working lives. See page 45 for more information about the 
Code and its implementation.
The Code provides a foundation for ‘Responsible Renishaw’, 
the Group’s global compliance brand, which guides employees 
on doing business responsibly in line with Renishaw’s culture 
and core values, fostering alignment. Throughout FY2024, the 
Board received updates covering all aspects of Responsible 
Renishaw, and communications took place around the Group 
to engage and educate employees on Responsible Renishaw 
topics. Employees are also invited to share their feedback on 
compliance through an annual survey, the feedback from 
which is shared with senior leadership and used to shape 
future communications.
Engagement with employees underlies the Board’s understanding 
of Renishaw’s culture. One of the ways the Board has been 
engaging with our people is through our global values competition, 
which aims to recognise and celebrate examples of our values in 
action across the business. Other ways in which the Board has 
engaged with employees are set out on page 23. The Board 
was pleased to receive updates from our HR colleagues on the 
steps we are taking as a business to attract and retain women 
in engineering.
60
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

The Board continues to monitor the situation and engage with 
shareholders to understand their views on this issue and any 
other significant matters. 
In addition to the AGM, we also hold an annual Capital 
Markets Day for current and potential shareholders, analysts, 
brokers and financial advisers. All of the Directors usually 
attend, and selected representatives from across the Group 
give presentations and answer questions from participants 
during the day. At this year’s Capital Markets Day, most of the 
Directors were available to speak to stakeholders. Information 
about our 2025 Capital Markets Day will be published in due 
course. We also hold online Q&A sessions with the Chief 
Executive and Group Finance Director as part of the full and 
half-year results webcasts. 
The Board continues to monitor progress with engagement 
mechanisms and regularly reviews our Investor Relations Policy. 
The Company’s overall approach to shareholder engagement 
is set out on page 24.
Other stakeholders
The Board remains committed to engaging effectively with other 
stakeholders to ensure we continue delivering value for them. 
Catherine Glickman, Independent Non-executive Director, 
remains our designated employee engagement ambassador. 
Catherine has extensive HR and remuneration experience and 
the Board believes her background and expertise make her 
ideally suited for this role, ensuring our employees’ views reach 
the boardroom. Catherine gives the Board helpful feedback 
from workforce engagement activities, including joining 
employee briefings and through her attendance at EDI forums. 
She provides regular briefings to the Board on recruitment, 
retention, and the progress of our key people projects. In light 
of this, the Board considers that this engagement mechanism 
remains the most appropriate for Renishaw. Further information 
on Catherine’s engagement activities can be found on pages 
23 and 43.
The Board also takes a close interest in the Group’s customers, 
the challenges they face, and how best Renishaw can support 
them. The Board receives regular updates on conversations 
that Will Lee, Chief Executive, and senior colleagues have with 
our customers. 
More details on the above engagements, and other activities, 
can be found in the How we engage with stakeholders section 
on pages 23 to 25. How the Board has considered stakeholders in 
discussions and decision-making can be found on pages 64 to 66.
Anti-bribery and corruption
Renishaw is committed to acting professionally, fairly and with 
integrity in all its business dealings and relationships wherever 
we operate, and to implementing and enforcing effective 
systems to counter bribery and corruption. Renishaw’s policy 
is to conduct all its business in an honest and ethical manner. 
We take a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption 
that is communicated to third parties with whom we do business. 
Our Group Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy prohibits the 
offering, paying, solicitation and receipt of bribes in any form. 
In addition, Renishaw’s Gifts and Hospitality Policy requires any 
giving or receipt of gifts, benefits or hospitality to be reasonable 
and proportionate. We maintain a Gifts and Hospitality Register 
and have in place a straightforward process for employees to 
seek approval when required.
We require third parties to sign up and adhere to anti-bribery 
and corruption clauses, and to comply with anti-bribery and 
corruption laws, in all relevant Group companies’ standard terms 
and conditions, standard form and negotiated agreements 
(including relationship agreements such as agency, distribution 
and consultancy agreements). Anti-bribery and corruption 
training is mandatory for all employees.
The Group has due diligence procedures for the onboarding 
of third-party agents and distributors designed to address 
bribery and corruption risks, which includes third-party 
screening. We are currently reviewing our approach to 
‘Know Your Customer’ matters, to enhance our customer-related 
due diligence.
Employee whistleblowing
The Board encourages our people to raise concerns about 
suspected unlawful or unethical behaviour and has outlined its 
expectations in our whistleblowing policy, our Speak Up Policy. 
The Group’s confidential global hotline service, ‘Speak Up’, is 
there for people to raise any concerns about suspected unlawful 
or unethical behaviour. The service is also available to officers, 
suppliers, customers, consultants, contractors, volunteers and 
job applicants, and any third parties who provide services for 
or on behalf of the Group. This year we logged 31 cases, 
compared with 18 in FY2023, all of which were promptly 
followed up. 
All cases are reviewed by our triage coordinators (currently 
the Head of Group Finance and the Group General Counsel & 
Company Secretary), unless the matter is about them, and are 
then allocated to an appropriate investigator. Every matter 
reported is investigated, unless it is considered outside of the 
scope of Speak Up (for example, if someone raises an issue that 
falls under our Grievance Policy). Regular meetings are held with 
key stakeholders to track the progress of investigations to help 
ensure cases are closed in a timely manner. The Board monitors 
the operation of this Policy and concerns raised, with the Audit 
Committee reviewing significant incidents and their outcomes. 
Conflicts of interest
The Board has a Conflicts of Interest Policy and a register of 
situational conflicts. This includes procedures for the disclosure 
and review of any conflicts and potential conflicts, and 
authorisation by the Board (if considered appropriate). The 
Board reviews all authorisations granted, and their associated 
terms, every year. New disclosures are made where applicable. 
61
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
Board and Committee meetings
The table below shows the number of meetings of the Board 
and its Committees, alongside Directors who attended and the 
number of meetings they were eligible to attend, during FY2024.
Director
Board
Audit
 Committee
Nomination
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
Sir David McMurtry
12/12
N/A
5/5
N/A
John Deer
11/121
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sir David Grant
12/12
6/6
5/5
6/6
Will Lee
12/12
N/A
N/A
N/A
Allen Roberts
12/12
N/A
N/A
N/A
Catherine Glickman2
11/12
6/6
4/5
6/6
Juliette Stacey
12/12
6/6
5/5
6/6
Stephen Wilson
12/12
6/6
5/5
6/6
Professor Dame 
Karen Holford3
11/11
4/4
4/4
4/4
1	 John Deer was absent from the Board meeting on 7 September 2023 due 
to a pre-existing commitment.
2	 Catherine Glickman was absent from the Board meeting and Nomination 
Committee meeting on 19 March 2024 due to a pre-existing commitment.
3	 Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed with effect from 1 September 
2023, and so was not eligible to attend any meetings held between 1 July 
2023 and 31 August 2023.
The table below sets out the Board and Committee meetings 
that occurred in FY2024.
Key
B 	 Board
A 	 Audit Committee
N 	 Nomination Committee
R 	 Remuneration Committee
* 	 Unscheduled meeting
2 Division of responsibilities
Governance structure
While the Board has overall responsibility for governance across 
the Group, it delegates certain matters to its three formally 
constituted Committees: the Audit Committee, the Remuneration 
Committee, and the Nomination Committee.
Our Executive Committee is responsible for the executive 
management of our businesses. It usually meets once a month 
and is chaired by the Chief Executive. Members also include the 
Executive Directors and senior managers, as noted on page 58. 
It considers the performance and strategic direction of our 
operating segments, performance against objectives, and 
other matters of general importance to the Group. 
A chart showing the governance structure is set out below.
The formal schedule of matters reserved for the Board includes: 
	
— the approval of full-year and half-year results, and 
trading statements;
	
— company and business acquisitions and disposals;
	
— major capital expenditure;
	
— borrowing facilities;
	
— reviewing the effectiveness of workforce engagement 
mechanisms;
	
— reviewing whistleblowing policy and processes;
	
— maintaining a sound and effective system of internal control 
and risk management;
	
— forecasts, business plans and budgets;
	
— material agreements;
	
— director and company secretary appointments and removals;
	
— patent-related disputes and other material litigation; and
	
— major product development projects.
The formal schedule of matters reserved for the Board and the 
terms of reference for each of the Audit Committee, Nomination 
Committee and Remuneration Committee are available on 
our website at www.renishaw.com/corporategovernance. 
The Committees reviewed their terms in July and August 2024.
A framework of delegated authorities maps out the structure 
below the Board and includes the matters reserved to the 
Executive Committee. It also includes the level of authorities 
given to management below the Executive Committee.
Board
Executive 
Committee
Risk Committee, ESG Steering Committee, product groups 
and subsidiary undertakings
Audit 
Committee
Nomination 
Committee
Remuneration 
Committee
62
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
July 2023
A   R*
August 2023
B   A   N   R  
September 2023
B*  B*  B   A
October 2023
B   B   A   R  
November 2023
B   N   R  
December 2023
January 2024
February 2024
B   A   N   R  
March 2024
B   N  
April 2024
May 2024
B   A
June 2024
B*  B   N*  R  

Subjects discussed by the Board during the year
Below is a high-level summary of the subjects the Board discussed during the year. 
For an in-depth look into some key decisions made by the Board in FY2024, see our 
Section 172 statement on pages 64 to 66.
Strategy
	
— Reviewed and updated our five-year financial plan.
	
— Reviewed and approved our strategic objectives.
	
— Received regular updates from Executive Committee and product groups regarding 
progress towards FY2024 objectives.
	
— Considered sales strategy.
Operational/commercial
	
— Received regular flagship project updates from product groups.
	
— Received regular regional sales updates.
	
— Considered cyber risk and received an update on the threat landscape and mitigations.
Financial
	
— Approved our full- and half-year results, as well as our interim and final dividends.
	
— Reviewed and approved our tax strategy.
	
— Reviewed trading updates.
	
— Approved forecast revenue and profit ranges.
Leadership and people
	
— Reviewed plans for Board-level succession planning.
	
— Received an update on EDI strategy.
	
— Considered the results of our global employee engagement survey.
	
— Reviewed the employee pay increase and bonus proposal for FY2024.
Internal control and risk management
	
— Approved our 2024 principal risks.
	
— Considered reports on compliance with financial, regulatory, corporate responsibility, 
and sustainability commitments.
Governance and stakeholders
	
— Participated in the FY2024 Board performance review and reviewed the resulting report.
	
— Received updates on key governance matters at every meeting.
	
— Reviewed our registers of Directors’ situational conflicts and related parties.
	
— Considered investor relations practices.
	
— Approved our Modern Slavery Statement.
	
— Approved policy for the composition of subsidiary boards.
Sustainability and the environment
	
— Approved the membership and terms of reference of the ESG Steering Committee. 
63
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
How did the Directors discharge their 
Section 172 duty during the year?
The Directors recognise that the decisions they make today 
will affect the business in the long term. It is acknowledged that 
different stakeholders have different needs, so the Board tries 
to understand these needs and priorities through engagement 
to inform its decision-making. This, together with considering 
the long-term consequences of decisions and maintaining 
our values and reputation for high standards of business 
conduct, underpins the way the Board operates and its 
governance framework. 
In understanding the needs and priorities of stakeholders, 
the Board also acknowledges that situations may arise where 
stakeholder groups have conflicting priorities. When this 
happens, the Board considers the priorities of each group. 
The Board assesses them individually and collectively from 
the perspective of the strategic objectives and the continued 
long-term sustainable success of the business. 
This statement explains how the Directors:
	
— have engaged with employees, shareholders, customers, 
suppliers, communities and others; and
	
— have considered employees’ interests, the need to act 
fairly between members of the Company, the need to 
foster business relationships with suppliers, customers 
and communities, the impact of Renishaw’s operations 
on the community and environment, its reputation for high 
standards of business conduct, and the outcomes of those 
considerations on the principal decisions taken during the 
financial year.
In this statement, principal decisions of the Board are defined 
as those taken in this financial year, which relate to matters 
of key strategic importance, and which are significant to any 
of Renishaw’s key stakeholders.
Principal decisions in FY2024
Set out on the following pages are examples of how key 
stakeholders, Section 172 duties, and other matters were 
considered by the Board when making its principal decisions 
in FY2024.
64
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
Section 172 statement
Directors are required by Section 172 of the Companies Act 
2006 to act in a way that they consider, in good faith, is most 
likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit 
of its members as a whole. In doing so, they must also have 
regard to wider responsible business behaviour, including the 
following factors:
	
— the likely consequences of any decision in the long term;
	
— the interests of the Company’s employees;
	
— the need to foster the Company’s business relationships 
with suppliers, customers and others;
	
— the impact of the Company’s operations on the community 
and the environment;
	
— the desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation 
for high standards of business conduct; and 
	
— the need to act fairly between members of the Company.
Not only is this the Directors’ statutory duty, but it is also the 
right way to conduct business to achieve long-term, sustainable 
success. Effective and inclusive decision-making is at the heart 
of Renishaw’s governance structures and is a foundation for 
effective value creation over the longer term. During this financial 
year, with continuing global economic uncertainty, geopolitical 
conflicts and inflationary pressure, balancing the needs and 
expectations of stakeholders continues to be an important 
and challenging task. 
The Board takes its role of ensuring that it fulfils its obligations 
to those affected by Renishaw’s business in its stakeholder 
consideration and engagement very seriously. It has ensured 
that such consideration is embedded throughout the business, 
with the Executive Committee and senior management actively 
engaged in communication and engagement initiatives.
How has the Board had regard to Section 
172 matters?
Engagement with employees, suppliers, and customers during 
the year is explained in the How we engage with stakeholders 
section on pages 23 to 25. Details of how the Board operates 
and matters considered by the Board are set out in the Directors’ 
Corporate Governance Report from page 54. The Directors 
regularly consider reports on health and safety, environment, 
and security. This supports the Directors in their decision-
making, helping them understand the impact those decisions 
have on local communities and the environment. It is critical to 
Renishaw’s success that high standards of business conduct 
are promoted. 
The Group Legal and Company Secretariat and Quality, 
Compliance, HR and Sustainability teams also report regularly 
to the Board. The Non-financial and sustainability information 
statement on page 52 identifies policies and guidelines 
governing Renishaw’s approach to climate-related financial 
disclosures, environmental matters, people, anti-corruption 
and anti-bribery, social matters and human rights. Considering 
the long-term effect of the decisions made by the Board is an 
integral part of the approval of strategy, and strategic progress 
this year is disclosed on page 9.

Appointing Peel Hunt 
What was the principal decision?
Which matters were considered?
Appointment of Peel Hunt as joint corporate broker, alongside 
the existing corporate broker, UBS.
Shareholders (existing and potential), employees, customers, 
suppliers, the UK listed company regulator (the FCA), proxy 
voting agencies and the long-term sustainable success of 
the Company.
How were the above matters considered?
The Board considered a revised Investor Relations Policy in which the Company would seek to have more engagement with key 
shareholders and potential investors. It also considered whether appointing a joint broker to work with UBS would be beneficial 
to develop Renishaw’s investor relations strategy, messaging, and to facilitate increased investor engagement with market 
participants generally. Past market participant feedback and proxy voting reports were also considered in this context, 
as well as the new 2024 Governance Code and associated guidance.
What was the outcome?
The outcome was the appointment of Peel Hunt announced in January 2024 and the following next steps:
	
— communication of a new long-term value creation model to explain market growth and Renishaw’s strategy for 
outperformance, see more on page 7;
	
— planned evolution of Renishaw’s regular results announcements, an in-person analyst presentation/Q&A in London and 
one-to-one meetings with key shareholders and potential investors;
	
— development of the Capital Markets Day; and
	
— meetings on governance matters offered with Sir David Grant to top 20 institutions who voted against the re-election of the 
founders as Directors. Meetings were held with five shareholders who took up the offer.
For more information, see page 24.
ESG Steering Committee
What was the principal decision?
Which matters were considered?
Establishment of an ESG Steering Committee.
Employees, customers, suppliers, the environment and 
communities, shareholders, regulators and the government, 
the long-term sustainable success of the Company, and 
maintaining high standards of business conduct.
How were the above matters considered?
As part of a wider governance review of ESG activities in the Group, the Board decided to establish a new ESG Steering 
Committee (Committee) to oversee the Group’s ESG priorities and conduct as a responsible and ethical corporate operator. 
The Board believed it was in the best interests of stakeholders for the oversight of these responsibilities to be delegated to 
a committee dedicated to ESG matters, as it would allow such matters, including stakeholder views on them, to be considered 
in greater detail. In addition to the Directors, Will Lee (Committee Chair), Allen Roberts, and Stephen Wilson, being appointed 
members of the Committee, it was important to the Board that the remaining members included representatives from various 
areas of the Group’s business. These include the product groups, sales regions, manufacturing and procurement, and corporate 
functions, to ensure a wide range of internal stakeholder voices are represented. The creation of the Committee has also 
resulted in increased oversight and accountability of ESG-related matters throughout the Group, and provided a platform for 
ESG matters to be considered by senior management.
What was the outcome?
Earlier this year the Committee approved an ESG strategy for the Group. The priorities of this strategy, including its goals 
and targets, are the result of a double materiality assessment that considered feedback from interviews with stakeholder 
representatives, and then ranked matters based on their importance to stakeholders. The materiality assessment was then 
analysed by the Committee to determine which specific ESG areas the strategy should focus on. The format and content of 
the ESG strategy, including the associated goals and strategic objectives, were also developed to support the Group’s wider 
business strategy of long-term sustainable growth.
As a result of this methodology, the ESG strategy reflects those matters that are considered to be the most important to the 
Group and key stakeholders. Going forward, the Committee will regularly monitor performance against the strategy’s goals and 
targets. The strategy as a whole will also be reviewed on an annual basis by the Committee to ensure it remains appropriate 
and continues to reflect the ESG matters considered most important by stakeholders. As part of this review, stakeholder 
representatives will again be engaged to determine if their views and priorities have changed. This feedback will then be 
considered to determine if and how the strategy needs to change.
For more information, see pages 35 to 45.
65
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
Renishaw Code of Conduct (Code)
What was the principal decision?
Which matters were considered?
Approval of the new Renishaw Code of Conduct.
Customers, shareholders, suppliers and agents and 
distributors, the environment and communities, regulators 
and the government, the long-term sustainable success 
of the Company, and maintaining high standards of 
business conduct.
How were the above matters considered?
The Board considered the policies currently in place within the Group covering ethical and legal requirements. It also assessed 
the culture it aspires to embed globally with all stakeholders versus the existing culture, in the context of the increasing 
regulatory requirements on listed multinational companies. The Board considered the territories in which the Group operates, 
its business model and strategy, as well as its principal risks.
What was the outcome?
The outcome was the implementation in November 2023 of a new Code, as a global guide on how to do business responsibly. 
It is aligned with the Group’s core values, acts as a top-level summary of key policies, and sets out how employees, and other 
key stakeholders, are expected to act in their daily working lives.
The Code is designed to be the go-to guide on how to comply with laws, regulations and policies. The Code also provides 
details on how to report any suspected wrongdoing via the Speak Up service.
The Code acts as a guide for any issues that might arise during stakeholders’ day-to-day work on Renishaw’s behalf. 
Each section contains:
	
— examples of common ethical situations;
	
— advice on what to watch out for;
	
— do’s and don’ts;
	
— links to relevant policies and resources; and
	
— contact details for further guidance.
The Code has been translated into 14 languages and the following implementation programmes have been carried out during 
the year:
	
— a global communication launch of the Code to all employees of Renishaw throughout November 2023; and
	
— employee acknowledgment of the Code integrated within the Human Resources Management System (Workday).
A roadshow of presentations to employees throughout the UK to embed the principles of the Code and to acknowledge FAQs 
in relation to the Code.
There are also ongoing plans to do the following:
	
— introduce a global Code of Conduct training programme; and
	
— continue to reinforce the Code in all aspects of our business practice.
For more information, see page 45.
Update regarding FY2023 
principal decision – Proposals 
relating to the UK defined benefit 
(DB) pension scheme
In FY2023, the Board approved 
a proposal to seek to insure the 
liabilities of the UK DB pension 
scheme. This insurance was secured 
in FY2024, completing this transaction.
66
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

67
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
2 Division of responsibilities 
continued
Composition and commitment of the Board
The Governance Code recommends that at least half of a board, 
excluding the chairman, should comprise independent non-
executive directors. During the financial year, the Board comprised 
nine Directors: two Executive Directors in addition to the Executive 
Chairman and six Non-executive Directors, five of whom are 
considered to be independent. With effect from 1 July 2024, 
the Board comprises 10 Directors: two Executive Directors, 
the Interim Non-executive Chairman and seven Non-executive 
Directors, four of whom are considered to be independent.
Catherine Glickman, Juliette Stacey, Stephen Wilson and 
Professor Dame Karen Holford are the Non-executive Directors 
considered to be independent in character and judgement, 
and there are no relationships or circumstances that are likely 
to affect their judgement. Sir David Grant was considered to be 
independent in character and judgement with no relationships 
or circumstances likely to affect his judgement throughout the 
financial year prior to him taking on the role of Interim Non-
executive Chairman.
Sir David Grant’s tenure
During the year, the Nomination Committee undertook 
a rigorous review of Sir David Grant’s independence, 
effectiveness and commitment given his service as an 
Independent Non-executive Director for more than 12 years. 
Sir David did not participate in these discussions. Following 
recommendation by the Nomination Committee, the Board 
concluded that Sir David continued to be independent in 
character and judgement, and there were no relationships 
or circumstances that are likely to affect, or could appear to 
affect, his judgement. The Board also noted the benefits of 
his extensive knowledge of the Company and expertise in 
engineering. When Sir David McMurtry informed the Board 
of his intention to step down as Executive Chairman of the 
Company, the Board concluded that it was in the best 
interests of the Company for Sir David Grant to remain on 
the Board to provide continuity and facilitate succession 
planning. Sir David Grant was therefore considered to be 
independent on appointment as Interim Non-executive 
Chairman for the purposes of provision 9 of the 
Governance Code.
In addition to the searches for a new Chair of the Board and 
Independent Non-executive Director, the Board continues to 
actively consider succession plans more generally, building on 
the appointments in recent years that have increased the range 
of skills and backgrounds on the Board, helping with diversity 
of thought and constructive challenge of management. 
This year’s internal Board evaluation concluded that the Board 
remains effective. More details about the Board evaluation can 
be found on pages 73 to 74.
The terms of appointment of the Non-executive Directors set 
out the expected time commitment, as well as the requirement 
to discuss any changes to other significant commitments with 
the Chairman and Chief Executive in advance. They are available 
for inspection at the Company’s AGM and its registered office 
upon written request. 
None of the Executive Directors holds a directorship in 
a FTSE 100 company.
The Board considers that all Renishaw’s Non-executive 
Directors demonstrate commitment to their roles and 
dedicate sufficient time to their Company duties. Each of the 
Independent Non-executive Directors provides support to the 
Board particularly on areas related to their skills and experience, 
which for Catherine Glickman is HR matters, for Juliette Stacey 
is finance, for Stephen Wilson is the software sector, global 
business and investor relations, and for Professor Dame Karen 
Holford is engineering and research and development. 
Further details of their contribution, skills and experience 
are summarised in their biographies on pages 56 to 57. 
Senior Independent Director and 
Non-executive Directors
Sir David Grant was the Senior Independent Director prior 
to taking on the role of Interim Non-executive Chairman on 
1 July 2024. The Board believes it is not in the interests of 
shareholders or the Company to appoint an interim Senior 
Independent Director and that this matter should be left to the 
new Chair to do so once they are appointed. In the meantime, 
Sir David remains available to discuss material concerns 
with shareholders, or, where this channel has failed to resolve 
concerns or this contact is inappropriate, the Company 
Secretary who will direct them to the appropriate Director.
During the year, the Non-executive Directors and Executive 
Chairman met without the other Executive Directors present to 
discuss performance, corporate governance, and other matters. 
The Independent Non-executive Directors also regularly met 
without the Executive Directors, Executive Chairman or other 
Directors present.
Division of responsibilities
There was a clear division of responsibilities at Board level 
throughout FY2024. This ensured that there was an appropriate 
balance of power and authority, so there is no one person with 
unfettered powers of decision-making. The Board and Executive 
Committee each meet on a regular basis to make decisions 
of significance to our business segments and review 
management actions.
You can find written statements of our Chief Executive’s and 
Chairman’s key responsibilities, which also detail the key 
responsibilities of the Senior Independent Director, on our 
website at www.renishaw.com/corporategovernance.

Governance Report
Directors’ Corporate Governance Report continued
68
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
Development
The Company offers its Directors the opportunity to attend 
formal training courses regarding their duties. The Company also 
provides them with guidance notes, papers and presentations on 
changes to law and regulations, as appropriate. Non-executive 
Directors are invited to attend internal events, which are a great 
way to keep up to date with product development and marketing 
initiatives. These events are also an opportunity for the Non-
executive Directors to engage with business units and functions. 
This year, members of the Board received two external training 
sessions. The first, from Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, covered 
updates on audit and corporate governance, reforms to the 
UK listing regime, and recent developments in directors’ duties. 
The second training session was led by UBS and covered 
relevant updates on the takeover code and other updates.
Business leaders (including from the finance and legal functions, 
product groups, and sales regions) give regular presentations 
at Board meetings, to update the Directors on their areas of 
responsibility, including updates regarding products and 
business strategies. These also give the Directors the chance 
to discuss latest developments, and current and future initiatives.
As a new Director that has joined us this year, we gave 
Professor Dame Karen Holford a tailored induction pack and 
bespoke induction programme. This induction included site 
visits and briefings by both senior managers and external 
advisers to help her to better understand what we do. As part 
of our continuing development programme, we also offer 
opportunities to attend external trade shows as well as 
overseas subsidiary visits. A similar induction programme 
for Richard McMurtry is underway.
Information and support
Board members receive business updates, financial information, 
and forecasts with relevant commentaries in advance of each 
Board meeting. These allow the Directors to review financial 
performance, current trading, and key business initiatives. 
Directors also have access to the Company Secretary, who 
advises the Board on all governance matters. Where necessary, 
the Directors have access to independent professional advice, 
at the Company’s expense, to discharge their responsibilities 
as Directors. The Company maintains liability insurance for 
the Directors and officers and has entered into indemnities 
as disclosed in Other statutory and regulatory disclosures 
on page 95.
3 Composition, succession 
and evaluation
Nomination Committee
A description of the membership and activities of the Nomination 
Committee, as well as the Board’s commitment to diversity, 
can be found on pages 70 to 75.
Re-election
In accordance with the Governance Code, all of the Directors 
retire from the Board at each AGM and offer themselves for 
re-election and re-appointment or, in the case of any Director 
who was first appointed to the Board since the last AGM, 
election to office.
4 Audit, risk and internal control
Audit Committee
A description of the membership and activities of the Audit 
Committee is set out on pages 76 to 81.
Financial and business reporting
The respective responsibilities of the Directors and auditor 
in connection with the Financial statements are set out in 
the Directors’ responsibilities section on page 99 and the 
Independent Auditor’s Report on pages 102 to 112.
Risk management and internal control
The Board is responsible for risk management and internal 
control, and for reviewing the effectiveness of these systems. 
The Group has an established process for the review of business 
risks throughout the Group, which includes the Risk Committee. 
Further information on Renishaw’s risk management and internal 
controls can be found in the Risk management section on pages 
11 to 18. Any system of internal control is designed to manage 
rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business 
objectives and can only give reasonable, but not absolute, 
assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The Board has conducted a robust assessment of the principal 
and emerging risks that Renishaw faces, including those that 
would threaten the Group’s business model, future performance, 
solvency, or liquidity. Renishaw’s principal risks and uncertainties 
can be found on pages 15 to 18. The Board is satisfied that there 
is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating, and managing 
the significant risks that the Group faces. This is regularly 
reviewed and accords with the FRC Guidance on Risk 
Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and 
Business Reporting. The Board verifies that necessary action 
has been or is being taken to remedy any significant failings 
or weaknesses identified from its review.
The Group has defined lines of responsibility and delegation 
of authorities. The Group also has established and centrally 
documented control procedures, including approvals of capital 
and other expenditure, information and technology security, 
and legal and regulatory compliance.

69
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
The Internal Audit function helps to give independent and 
objective assurance on the operation of the controls it tests. 
The Group Internal Audit Manager attends Audit Committee 
meetings to present annual internal audit plans and the results 
of such audits. The Audit Committee monitors actions on an 
ongoing basis.
The Board ensures that the Group has effective internal controls 
over the financial reporting and consolidation processes. 
Monthly accounts and forecasts are presented to the Board for 
review. The Internal Audit function reviews financial controls and 
management accounts.
The Board reviews the effectiveness of the system of internal 
controls, including via the Audit Committee. It receives regular 
reports from the Internal Audit function, external auditors, and 
other advisers, and carries out an updated risk and controls 
analysis every year. The review covers material controls, 
including financial, operational, and compliance controls, 
and risk management systems.
The Audit Committee has regularly received updates on the UK 
government’s audit and governance reforms, and management’s 
work to respond to these changes. During the year, management 
have focused on improving and standardising risk and controls 
documentation, and performing an updated fraud risk 
assessment that also considers the new corporate criminal 
offence of the failure to prevent fraud.
Going concern
The Directors have assessed the Group’s position as a going 
concern, and updated the assessment before signing this report. 
The Board considered the Group’s forecast profits and cash 
flows for the period from the date of approval of the Annual 
Report to 30 September 2025. The Board is satisfied that the 
Group has adequate resources to continue operating as 
a going concern for the foreseeable future, and that no 
material uncertainties exist with respect to this assessment.
Viability statement
The Board approved the Company’s viability statement 
on page 19.
5 Remuneration
The methods used to apply the Governance Code 
principles relating to remuneration are set out in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report. A description of the membership 
and activities of the Remuneration Committee is set out on 
pages 84 to 85.
Compliance statement
The Board considers that it has complied with the provisions of 
the Governance Code throughout FY2024 except in relation to 
the following matter:
	
— Provision 19 (that the chair should not remain in post beyond 
nine years from the date of their first appointment). Sir David 
McMurtry, who co-founded Renishaw together with John Deer 
in 1973, was appointed to the Board in September 1975 and 
held the position of Executive Chairman from the Company’s 
listing in 1984, during which time the Board’s view was that 
Sir David’s service as Executive Chairman remained in the 
best interests of the Company and its shareholders. This is 
in part because of his unique history as a co-founder of 
Renishaw and continued effective leadership of the Board, 
but equally importantly his contribution to the Group’s 
long-term, sustainable success from his role and 
responsibilities for innovation and product strategy. Sir David 
McMurtry stepped down from the role of Executive Chairman 
on 30 June 2024 and Sir David Grant took on the role of 
Interim Non-executive Chairman with effect from 1 July 2024. 
Sir David Grant has served on the Board of the Company 
since April 2012 and the Board concluded that it was in the 
best interests of the Company for Sir David Grant take on the 
role of Interim Non-executive Chairman to provide continuity 
and facilitate succession planning.
In light of the changes to the composition of the Board which 
took effect on 1 July 2024, the Company ceased to be compliant 
with provision 11 of the Governance Code (that at least half the 
Board, excluding the Chairman, should be Non-executive 
Directors whom the Board considers to be independent). 
As noted in the Nomination Committee Report, searches for 
both a new Chair of the Board and a new independent Non-
executive Director are underway.
Sir David Grant
Interim Non-executive Chairman
11 September 2024

Governance report
Board diversity
We have seen an improvement in Board-level diversity in FY2024, 
with the percentage of female directors increasing from 25% to 
33% (as at 30 June 2024). However, we are aware that this falls 
short of the UK Listing Rules target of 40% female directors. 
As part of our searches for both a new Independent Chair and 
Independent Non-executive Director, we will ensure candidates 
from broad and diverse backgrounds are included in shortlists 
while continuing to appoint on merit against objective criteria.
Succession planning
Succession planning has been another important activity for 
the Committee this year, in particular for key members of the 
Senior Leadership Team. As outlined in the Social section of 
our ESG review, we believe that attracting and retaining the right 
people with the right skills is key to our success and therefore 
we are working hard to retain and develop our internal talent. 
The Committee oversees the development of succession plans 
for our senior management roles and seeks to ensure that 
a diversity of talent is available, developed and retained in the 
business. Further information on succession planning can be 
found later in this report.
Priorities for FY2025
Over the coming year, in addition to our searches for a new 
Independent Chair of the Board and Independent Non-executive 
Director, our focus will be to continue progress on Board and key 
role succession, including the oversight of individual development 
plans for identified successors. In doing so, we will ensure 
that the development plans contain a sufficient diversity of 
candidates and that policies and processes are in place 
to support that diversity.
Sir David Grant
Chair of the Nomination Committee
11 September 2024 
Introduction
I am pleased to present the Nomination Committee Report for 
the year ended 30 June 2024. I took over as interim Chair of 
the Committee in July 2024, after Sir David McMurtry stepped 
down from the Committee in conjunction with him stepping down 
as the Company’s Executive Chairman. I would like to thank 
Sir David for his strong leadership of the Committee and the 
Committee’s focus in the near term is continuing the process to 
appoint a permanent successor to Sir David McMurtry in the role 
of Chair of the Board as well as further strengthening the Board 
through the appointment of an additional Independent Non-
executive Director.
The Nomination Committee continues to play a vital role in the 
stewardship of the Company by identifying and recommending 
Board members and succession planning for Board and senior 
management positions. Underpinning the way we fulfil this role 
is our thorough review and understanding of the skills and 
experience required to support the business and foster long-
term strategic success.
Strengthening the Board
We were delighted to welcome Professor Dame Karen Holford 
to the Board with effect from 1 September 2023. In her first year, 
Dame Karen has already made a significant contribution to the 
Board and strategic discussions, her engineering experience 
proving to be a significant asset. Additionally, she has played 
an important role in our discussions on diversity. Dame Karen 
was appointed following a process that straddled FY2023 and 
FY2024 and is outlined on page 75. Following Dame Karen’s 
appointment, a further Board skills and experience exercise was 
carried out, which mapped the strategic needs of the business 
with the Board’s strengths. This is discussed more fully later in 
this report. The results of this exercise will help to inform our 
succession discussions.
As announced in June 2024, I am also pleased to welcome 
Sir David McMurtry’s son, Richard McMurtry, as an additional 
Non-executive Director. Richard is a highly experienced director 
of various businesses and an investor who supports start-up 
companies committed to developing the future of innovation in 
the UK. He trained as an engineer with significant involvement 
in product development and robotic systems.
Following Sir David McMurtry stepping down as Executive 
Chairman, we are continuing to make good progress with the 
search for his successor and will make an announcement on this 
in due course. I will continue to serve as Interim Non-executive 
Chairman until this time to provide some continuity, help facilitate 
the recruitment process, and ensure an effective handover.
Nomination Committee Report
70
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Key activities
The Committee’s key areas of focus during FY2024 included:
Skills assessment and succession planning
	
— Conducted a skills and experience assessment of the Board.
	
— Reviewed the structure, size and composition of the Board 
and its Committees.
	
— Oversaw the recruitment and induction of Professor Dame 
Karen Holford.
	
— Considered the appointment of Richard McMurtry as 
a Non-executive Director.
	
— Initiated searches for a new Independent Chair of the Board 
and additional Independent Non-executive Director.
	
— Recommended the reappointment of Catherine Glickman for 
an additional three-year term.
	
— Considered succession planning for both the Executive and 
Non-executive Directors.
	
— Reviewed talent and succession plans for key senior 
operational and executive roles.
Governance
	
— Reviewed and updated the Committee’s terms of reference.
	
— Reviewed the time commitment required of the Non-executive 
Directors and evaluated whether sufficient time was being 
committed to deliver their duties.
	
— Assessed the independence of each Non-executive Director, 
agreeing that all Non-executive Directors (excluding John Deer) 
were independent.
	
— Recommended the re-election of each Director due to retire 
at the AGM.
Board performance review
	
— Monitored the implementation of the improvement plan arising 
out of the FY2023 external Board performance review.
	
— Arranged the FY2024 internal Board performance review.
	
— Reviewed the results of the performance review in relation 
to the Committee’s own performance, and any items relating 
to the composition of the Board and succession planning.
	
— Recommended an action plan arising out of the FY2024 Board 
performance review to the Board for approval.
Role and responsibilities
The Committee operates under written terms of reference, 
which were reviewed and updated this year, and published on 
Renishaw’s website at www.renishaw.com/corporategovernance. 
The Committee is primarily responsible for:
	
— reviewing the size, structure and composition – including the 
balance of skills, knowledge, experience and diversity – of the 
Board and its Committees (taking into consideration the 
outcome of the Board performance review), and 
recommending changes to the Board, as appropriate;
	
— overseeing succession planning for the Board and other 
senior management. In doing so, it considers how to create 
a pipeline for succession that promotes diversity, inclusion 
and equal opportunity. The Committee also takes into 
account the leadership skills and expertise required in the 
future to achieve the Group’s strategic goals;
	
— recommending to the Board its policy on equality, diversity 
and inclusion (EDI) as it applies to the Board and its 
Committees, its objectives, appointments and nominating 
candidates for appointment, and its link to strategy;
	
— leading the process for new Board appointments and 
nominating candidates for appointment; and
	
— reviewing the performance of, and making recommendations 
to the Board on, the re-election of Directors at the AGM.
Members and attendance
The Committee was chaired by Sir David McMurtry for the 
entirety of FY2024. Sir David Grant now chairs the Committee 
and has done since 1 July 2024. The other four members are 
the Independent Non-executive Directors. Only Committee 
members are entitled to attend meetings, although the 
Committee Chair regularly invites Will Lee to attend, unless 
discussions are due to take place on his role. The Committee 
met on five occasions during FY2024. Attendance for each of 
the members at these meetings is set out in the table below:
Committee member
Attended
Sir David McMurtry (Chair, to 30 June 2024) 
5/5
Sir David Grant (Chair, from 1 July 2024)
5/5
Catherine Glickman1
4/5
Juliette Stacey 
5/5
Stephen Wilson 
5/5
Professor Dame Karen Holford²
4/4
1	 Catherine Glickman was absent from the meeting on 19 March due to 
a pre-existing commitment.
2	 Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed with effect from 1 September 
2023 and was therefore not eligible to attend the first meeting scheduled 
in FY2024.
71
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Nomination Committee Report continued
Board diversity
As shown in the table below, as at 30 June 2024 the proportion 
of women on the Board was 33%, meaning the Company 
has not yet met the UK Listing Rules’ targets of 40% female 
Directors, of having one of the senior Board positions (Chairman, 
Chief Executive, Senior Independent Director or Group Finance 
Director) held by a woman, and for having a director on the 
Board from a minority ethnic background. The Board recognises 
that this means Renishaw does not yet meet the targets of the 
UK Listing Rules.
During the year, Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed 
as an additional female director on the Board, further increasing 
the gender diversity. However, following the changes to the 
composition of the Board that took place on 1 July 2024, the 
proportion of women on the Board became 30%. The Committee 
believes the current Directors bring a diverse range of 
perspectives, and that they continue to fulfil their roles effectively 
considering their experience, skills and competencies. The 
Committee remains committed to ensuring candidates from 
broad and diverse backgrounds (including candidates who 
may not have prior listed-company experience) are included 
in shortlists in current and future recruitment searches, while 
continuing to appoint on merit against objective criteria. 
This helps ensure the Board has the right skills, knowledge, 
experience and diversity of perspective that enable it to 
effectively discharge its responsibilities and achieve the 
Company’s strategic targets. By ensuring a diverse range of 
candidates are included on shortlists for Board appointments, 
the Committee is hopeful that the Board will align with the UK 
Listing Rules’ targets in due course.
Diversity
The Committee understands the benefits that diversity can bring 
to the discussions and decision-making of the Board and its 
Committees by bringing wide-ranging perspectives and 
experience. Increasing the diversity of the Board is therefore 
something the Committee remains committed to. The Group’s 
EDI Policy and standards are applied when reviewing the 
composition of the Board and its Committees, overseeing 
succession planning, recommending changes to the Board 
and Senior Leadership Team, and nominating candidates for 
appointment. Recruitment consultants hired by the Company 
for senior positions are chosen on the basis that they will present 
a diverse list of candidates, including female candidates and 
those from ethnic minority backgrounds. 
Under Renishaw’s EDI Policy, the Board has responsibility 
for developing a diverse pipeline for succession to senior 
management roles, which it does with the help of the 
Committee, and for targeting greater diversity at Board level, 
having regard to the three targets set out in the UK Listing Rules. 
The Committee recognises that for the engineering sector to 
achieve its full potential, it is important that it mirrors the society 
in which it operates. The Committee will continue to focus on 
improving all forms of diversity at senior management level 
across the Group and ensure that policies are in place to 
support a diverse intake into the industry. Renishaw’s approach 
to diversity across the Group more widely, including the EDI 
Policy and diversity initiatives undertaken throughout the year, 
are set out on page 42.
Ethnic representation of the Board and executive management as at 30 June 2024
Ethnic background
Number 
of Board
members
Percentage of
the Board
Number of senior
positions on the 
Board (CEO, CFO, 
SID and Chair)
Number in 
executive
management
Percentage of 
executive 
management
White British or other White 
(including minority-white groups)
9
100
4
7
100
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups
–
–
–
–
–
Asian/Asian British
–
–
–
–
–
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
–
–
–
–
–
Other ethnic group
Not specified/prefer not to say
–
–
–
–
–
Gender representation of the Board and executive management as at 30 June 2024
Gender identity
Number 
of Board
members
Percentage of
the Board
Number of senior
positions on the 
Board (CEO, CFO, 
SID and Chair)
Number in
executive
management
Percentage of 
executive 
management
Men
6
67
4
6
86
Women
3
33
–
1
14
Not specified/prefer not to say
–
–
–
–
–
72
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Gender and ethnic representation on the Board and the 
executive management
For the purposes of the UK Listing Rules, the gender identity 
and ethnic background of the Board and executive management 
(as at 30 June 2024) is reported in the tables on page 72. 
The data was collected by a combination of pre-existing internal 
records and asking each member of the Board and executive 
management to indicate their gender and ethnicity according to 
the categories presented in the tables. References to executive 
management include the members of the Executive Committee 
(including the Executive Directors). The terms used in the UK 
Listing Rules map to the Company’s roles as follows: CEO is the 
Chief Executive, CFO is the Group Finance Director and SID is 
the Senior Independent Director.
Board performance review
The Board undertakes a review of its performance and 
effectiveness annually to identify opportunities for improvement. 
After conducting an external review last year, the review has this 
year been conducted internally with support from the Interim 
Company Secretary. As outlined by the Governance Code, 
the next external review will take place no later than 2026.
Key findings from the FY2023 review
The 2023 Annual Report reported on the FY2023 external Board 
performance review. Progress on the main outcomes is outlined 
in the table below:
Senior Management diversity 
As shown in the table on page 72, as at 30 June 2024, the 
proportion of women on the Executive Committee was 14%. 
Following the appointment of Kasim Hussain on 29 July 2024, 
the ethnicity representation on the Executive Committee has 
increased to 14%.
Senior Management, being the Executive Committee (including 
Executive Directors) and their direct reports (excluding those in 
administrative or non-managerial roles), is made up of 39 men 
and 14 women (26%). Unfortunately, this means that the 
Company has not yet met the FTSE Women Leaders Review 
target of 40%. In an effort to help increase gender diversity 
at this level a target of 40% women in Senior Management by 
December 2027 has been set this year. In line with the new 
Parker Review recommendations, an ethnic minority target of 
10% of UK-based Senior Management to be met by December 
2027 has also been set. As at 30 June 2024, UK-based Senior 
Management consisted of 46 people, of whom none self-
identified as being of an ethnic minority. With the new ESG 
Steering Committee monitoring these targets, the Nomination 
Committee will have access to this data when considering 
succession plans and any recruitment activities for Senior 
Management. It is hoped that with this increased focus and 
accountability, the diversity of Senior Management will increase.
Strategic planning
Succession planning
Relationship with investors
FY2023 
outcomes
To enhance the Board’s oversight of 
strategy by taking a higher-level view 
for the Group as a whole.
To continue focusing on identifying 
successors for Directors and 
senior leaders, considering future 
skills requirements.
Increase interaction with investors to 
gain a better understanding of their 
views of the Company and its markets.
Actions for 
FY2024
Increase Board time dedicated to 
items of strategic importance. Develop 
ongoing oversight mechanisms for 
achievement of targets.
Update and refresh the succession 
plans for the Board and senior 
leaders.
Establish an investor relations 
programme with regular updates 
to the Board.
Progress made 
in FY2024
Time spent on operational matters 
has decreased and dashboards are 
now used to monitor progress against 
strategic objectives.
Contingency succession plans are 
now in place and longer-term 
succession plans for the Executive 
Directors have been considered 
and refreshed.
A more active investor engagement 
programme has been implemented 
and Peel Hunt appointed as joint 
corporate brokers. Refreshed investor 
relations reporting is provided to the 
Board monthly.
2
8
3
7
4
4
2
1
9
Role
Gender
Tenure
Nationality
	Executive
	Non-executive
	Female
	Male
	0-3 years
	4-8 years
	9+ years
	British
	Irish
Information regarding Board members (as at 11 September 2024)
73
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Nomination Committee Report continued
Succession planning
During the year, the Committee further developed the 
succession plans for the Board, Executive Committee and key 
roles of the Senior Leadership Team. A focus at the start of the 
year was contingency planning, ensuring the business is 
prepared for any sudden absence of a Director or a member 
of the Senior Leadership Team. Renishaw has a strong track 
record of promoting from within, so the Committee was able 
to identify suitable candidates who could take on additional 
responsibilities to cover for the absent person until they could 
return or a permanent replacement found. The Committee also 
looked at the long-term succession plans during the year to 
identify potential successors for the Senior Leadership Team, 
evaluate their readiness in the short, medium and long term, 
suggest development plans for internal candidates and consider 
the need for external candidates.
In reviewing the length of tenure of each Director, the Committee 
was mindful that a number of Directors had held their positions 
for significant periods of time. This was taken into consideration 
when looking at the succession plan. Further information is set 
out in the Directors’ Corporate Governance Report on page 67.
It is important for the long-term sustainable success of the Group 
that the future leadership and stewardship of the business is 
carried out by individuals with the right mix of skills, experience 
and backgrounds. Not only will this help ensure a wide variety 
of perspectives leading to balanced decision-making, it will also 
ensure the business is well placed to take advantage of future 
opportunities, including changing environments, technological 
disruptions, regulatory changes and social trends. All of this 
helps the Company achieve its strategic goals. The Committee 
therefore undertook a skills assessment this year to better 
understand the balance of skills, experiences and attributes that 
are on the Board and where it could strengthen. The table on the 
following page sets out those skills present on the Board.
The Committee has used the outcome of the skills assessment 
as a guide for which skills to focus on when preparing role 
specifications and assessing potential candidates for both the 
replacement Independent Chair of the Board and additional 
Independent Non-executive Director, and will take account of it 
for additional recruitment activities in the future. The Committee 
will continue to assess the balance of skills and experience on 
the Board going forward.
FY2024 Board performance review
Having conducted an external performance review last year, 
the Board decided to undertake an internal performance review 
for FY2024, with support from the Interim Company Secretary. 
The performance review covered the Board and its Committees 
in addition to the Chairman’s effectiveness. The Committee 
reviews were conducted at Committee meetings, with the 
respective Chairs then reporting the recommendations into 
the Board review.
The first part of the performance review consisted of a written 
questionnaire completed by each Director and certain members 
of the Senior Leadership Team. The questions related to the 
effectiveness of the Board and its Committees; they were 
based on last year’s questions and answers to highlight areas 
of improvement, and also included some additional topical 
matters. Answers to the questionnaires were then anonymised 
and aggregated before forming the basis of a facilitated 
roundtable discussion.
To help ensure the performance review was as effective, formal 
and rigorous as possible, each Director was given the option 
to have a pre-meeting with the Interim Company Secretary to 
air concerns they may have been uncomfortable raising in the 
roundtable discussion. Any such concerns were then raised 
anonymously by the Interim Company Secretary during the 
roundtable discussion.
The agenda, which was set by reference to the outcomes of the 
pre-meetings and questionnaire, was circulated in advance 
of the discussion, where comprehensive minutes were taken. 
The outcomes of the performance review were discussed at 
a Board meeting later in the year, where it was concluded that 
the Board remains effective. The areas noted in the table 
above were highlighted as opportunities to further enhance 
Board performance.
An action plan was compiled and agreed by the Board in August 
2024 based on the performance review’s recommendations. 
The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary is responsible 
for tracking these actions and reporting back to the Board 
periodically on progress made.
Succession planning
and diversity
Board interaction with senior 
management
Investor relations
Actions for 
FY2025
Continue succession planning 
for the Board with a focus on 
improving diversity.
Create opportunities for senior 
management to engage more 
formally with the Board.
Continue to build understanding with 
institutional investors and receive 
more regular updates from brokers.
74
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Board appointment process
The Board has an established process for identifying and 
evaluating candidates for appointment to the Board and Senior 
Management roles. Equally, Board and Senior Management 
appointments are subject to the principles set out in the EDI 
Policy, which formalises the Group’s commitment to diversity 
at all levels (more information on this Policy is set out on 
page 72). The EDI principles, as set out in the Policy, are 
discussed with the recruitment consultant to ensure they 
take account of its provisions when preparing a longlist of 
candidates for discussion.
These established processes, and in particular the use of 
Kingsley Gate as external search consultants to support 
the recruitment process, were used in connection with 
the appointment of Professor Dame Karen Holford as an 
Independent Non-executive Director of the Company. 
Kingsley Gate has no other connection with the Company 
or with individual Directors. An external search consultancy 
was not used in connection with the appointment of Richard 
McMurtry as a Non-executive Director of the Board. The 
Nomination Committee carefully considered Richard McMurtry’s 
prospective appointment and concluded that his judgement and 
experience would add value to the Board and its discussions.
Information regarding the induction process for Professor Dame 
Karen Holford and Richard McMurtry is set out on page 68. 
All Non-executive Directors are appointed to the Board for an 
initial three-year period subject to annual performance review 
and re-election by shareholders at the AGM.
Engaging external recruitment consultants to assist 
with the recruitment
Agreeing role specifications for the proposed 
appointment
Consultants reviewing a longlist of candidates and 
reducing to a shortlist*
Reviewing a shortlist of diverse candidates provided 
by the consultants*
Inviting the preferred candidate to meet the 
whole Board 
Recommending the preferred candidate to 
the Board
Preparing a bespoke induction programme based on 
the individual’s role and experience
Interviewing the candidate or candidates who best fit 
the role specification against objective criteria, with 
due regard to the benefits of diversity on the Board
Appointing a sub-committee of the Board to oversee 
the process
Evaluating the balance of skills, knowledge, experience 
and diversity on the Board, including considering the 
skills and experience required of the candidates
The Committee’s procedure for Board 
appointments includes the following steps
*In respect of the recent appointment of Professor Dame Karen 
Holford, the Committee reviewed the longlist of candidates and 
created its own shortlist.
Board skills
	
— Strategy
	
— Financial performance
	
— Risk and compliance oversight
	
— Information technology strategy and governance
	
— Executive management
	
— ESG
	
— Board experience
	
— Commercial experience
	
— Mergers & acquisitions experience
	
— International business experience
	
— Research & development
	
— Engineering – electrical, mechanical and optical
	
— Software development
	
— Manufacturing
	
— Global sales via multiple channels
Sir David Grant
Chair of the Nomination Committee
11 September 2024
75
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
The Group’s Internal Audit team was strengthened this year 
and the Committee welcomed the opportunity this brings to 
increase the team’s scope of work and face-to-face activity with 
the Group’s subsidiary teams. We also saw a change in the 
external audit team this year, with a new lead audit engagement 
partner following the previous partner’s mandatory rotation off 
the audit. Working with the new audit partner has been a priority 
for the Committee this year and we welcome the different 
perspectives that new members of the external audit team 
bring to the process. 
Looking ahead to FY2025, the above changes in the second 
and third lines of defence, together with a recent restructure in 
Group Finance and further implementations of Microsoft D365, 
provide good opportunities for the business to further strengthen 
its control environment and provide integrated reporting to 
the Committee. 
I will be attending the AGM on 27 November 2024 and look 
forward to answering any questions about the work of the 
Audit Committee.
Juliette Stacey
Chair of the Audit Committee
11 September 2024
 
76
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
Introduction 
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Audit 
Committee Report for FY2024. 
This year brought some significant activities and change 
across our main areas of responsibility: financial reporting, 
risk management and internal controls, and overseeing the 
internal and external audit processes. A financial reporting 
focus area this year has been the review of management’s 
work on the purchase of an insurance buy-in scheme for the 
UK defined benefit pension scheme (‘the Scheme’) and its 
subsequent accounting and reporting. The buy-in is designed 
to reduce the funding risk, with the insurance policy covering 
most of the Scheme’s liabilities. 
Another area of focus has been the review of management’s 
change in approach to determining inventory provisions (the 
estimate of the net realisable value of inventory at the year-end). 
We discussed the proposed approach before the year-end, 
challenged the rationale for the new basis, and also reviewed 
the new estimate at the year-end. Our conclusion was that 
management’s change in approach was appropriate, and that 
it had been correctly applied to inventory at the year-end. 
Our work on risk management and internal controls involved 
discussion throughout the year on management’s progress 
in strengthening the internal control framework. We have 
concluded that the framework is effective overall, while 
supporting the areas of improvement identified by management, 
such as greater standardisation of controls and consistency 
in documentation. The Committee has had constructive 
discussions with management on the prioritisation of this work 
and the resourcing changes that may be necessary across the 
Group. This will remain a focus area in FY2025.
Audit Committee Report

Committee meetings
Committee member
Attended
Juliette Stacey (Chair)
6/6
Catherine Glickman
6/6
Sir David Grant
6/6
Professor Dame Karen Holford*
4/4
Stephen Wilson
6/6
*Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed with effect from 1 September 
2023 and attended all Committee meetings from that date onwards.
Committee effectiveness
The effectiveness of the Audit Committee formed part of the 
Board performance review described in the Nomination 
Committee Report on page 73 and 74. 
 
The role of the Committee and how it works
The Audit Committee has an important role in providing 
assurance of effective internal controls and financial reporting 
on behalf of the Board and shareholders. The Committee fulfils 
this role by focusing on the following key areas:
	
— external reporting, including the Annual Report;
	
— the risk management and internal control framework;
	
— the internal audit process; and
	
— the external audit process. 
The Committee’s relationship with the Board is an important 
part of how it fulfils its responsibilities, and the Board receives 
regular and timely reports from the Committee Chair on the 
above activities. 
An overview of the Committee’s work in these areas during 
the year is set out above and the terms of reference can be 
found at www.renishaw.com/corporategovernance.
Committee membership
The Committee members are the Independent Non-executive 
Directors. The Board considers that, as a whole, the Committee 
has competencies relevant to Renishaw’s sector and finance 
to fulfil its responsibilities, including relevant professional 
qualifications and experience in senior finance roles. 
The Independent Non-executive Director biographies can 
be found on pages 56 to 57. 
The Audit Committee has been advised internally this year by the 
Interim Company Secretary, and the Deputy Company Secretary 
acts as secretary to the Committee.
Key activities
External reporting, 
including the Annual Report
Risk management and 
internal control
Internal audit
External audit
	
— Reviewing the Annual 
Report, Interim Report, 
and trading updates 
before publication.
	
— Discussing management’s 
assessment of significant 
judgements, estimates 
and financial reporting 
topics (as explained in 
more detail on the next 
two pages) and challenging 
management’s view.
	
— Assessing whether the 
Annual Report is fair, 
balanced and 
understandable.
	
— Reviewing the assumptions 
and financial modelling for 
the viability and going 
concern assessments.
	
— Reviewing the Risk 
Committee’s assessment of 
principal and emerging risks.
	
— Assessing and approving 
management’s updated risk 
management framework 
and approach to improving 
documentation.
	
— Reviewing the effectiveness 
of internal controls.
	
— Reviewing management’s 
work on improving the 
design and operation 
of financial controls, 
including the introduction 
of Microsoft D365.
	
— Monitoring management’s 
progress in preparing for 
the new ‘failure to prevent 
fraud’ offence.
	
— Agreeing the scope and 
resourcing of Internal 
Audit’s work.
	
— Evaluating Internal Audit’s 
findings and monitoring 
the responses from 
management and 
discussing these with 
the Group Internal 
Audit Manager.
	
— Conducting a review on 
the effectiveness of 
Internal Audit.
	
— Interviewing and assessing 
EY’s candidates for the 
new audit engagement 
partner role.
	
— Reviewing EY’s audit plan, 
including their scope and 
methodology, ahead of the 
FY2024 audit.
	
— Discussing with EY their 
progress and findings 
throughout the audit.
	
— Conducting a review on the 
effectiveness of EY and their 
audit process.
	
— Reviewing any non-audit 
services and the 
corresponding policy. 
77
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
External reporting
The Committee reviews significant financial reporting issues and judgements made in preparing the financial statements, preliminary 
announcements and trading updates. The Committee also reviews related information in the Annual Report regarding the audit and 
risk management. 
The Committee’s work this year on these areas of external reporting is set out below.
Significant accounting judgements and estimates
Cash flow hedges
Description
Our review and conclusions
Most of the Group’s sales are generated outside of the UK. 
This means most invoices to, and payments from, customers are 
in foreign currency. Forward currency contracts are therefore used 
to manage the effect on Revenue of movements in the Group’s three 
most significant trading currencies.
Where these contracts are designated as hedges of future cash 
flows (and therefore intended by management to be eligible for 
hedge accounting), the hedged item is a layer component of 
forecast sales transactions. Management needs to estimate both 
‘more likely than not’ and ‘highly probable’ revenue forecasts to 
determine the correct accounting treatment.
If contracts are no longer eligible for hedge accounting, future 
movements in the fair value of these contracts would be recognised 
through the Consolidated income statement, rather than Other 
comprehensive income and expense.
Revenue forecasts, including ‘more likely than not’ and ‘highly 
probable’ levels were presented by management at Board meetings. 
We discussed the rationale for the ‘highly probable’ and ‘more 
likely than not’ levels, and the assumptions used in generating 
the forecasts.
We also confirmed with management that they used these Board-
approved forecasts to support the hedge accounting treatment, and 
agreed with management’s conclusion that the contracts designated 
as hedges of future cash flows were eligible for hedge accounting.
Research and development projects
Description
Our review and conclusions
The Group undertakes a significant amount of R&D work each year, 
and two key decisions are needed to determine the appropriate 
accounting treatment for related costs.
The first decision is a judgement as to whether expenditure during 
the year on R&D activities meets the requirement for this 
expenditure to be capitalised.
The second decision, for projects that have met the criteria for 
capitalisation, is to estimate the discounted future cash flows of 
the project and compare this to its capitalised development costs. 
If the future cash flows are lower than the capitalised development 
cost, an impairment should be recognised.
We reviewed the costs of the projects capitalised in the year, and 
agreed that they had been capitalised at the appropriate point in 
their development.
We also reviewed the discounted future cash flows for these 
projects and the ones that had previously been capitalised, together 
with the key assumptions behind these forecasts. We then reviewed 
the headroom between the capitalised costs and the discounted 
future cash flows, and agreed with management’s assessment that 
an impairment of £3.3m was needed for three projects due to 
reductions in their expected future cash flows.
Goodwill
Description
Our review and conclusions
Where the Group recognises goodwill from the acquisition of 
a business, an estimate of the discounted future cash flows of 
this business (representing a ‘cash-generating unit’) is needed.
This is compared to the carrying value of goodwill, to identify 
whether an impairment to goodwill is needed. At 30 June 2024 
goodwill totalled £11.2m.
There are three main cash-generating units (CGUs) for which 
goodwill is recognised, relating to the acquisitions of itp GmbH, 
Renishaw Mayfield S.A. and Renishaw Fixturing Solutions LLC.
We reviewed the discounted future cash flows for these CGUs, and 
the key assumptions behind these forecasts. Included in this was 
a review of management’s previous forecasts and how they 
compared to actual results.
We then reviewed the headroom between the capitalised costs and 
the discounted future cash flows, and agreed with management’s 
assessment that no impairment was needed.
Audit Committee Report continued
78
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Inventories
Description
Our review and conclusions
The Group holds a significant amount of inventory (£161.9m at 
30 June 2024). Estimates of future demand are used to determine 
the provision needed for slow-moving and potentially obsolete 
inventory, so that inventory is appropriately valued at the lower 
of actual cost and net realisable value.
During the year, management changed the basis for this estimate, 
as described in more detail on page 137.
At 30 June 2024, the inventory provision was £29.6m.
We sought explanations from management on the rationale for the 
change in approach to determining the inventory provision, their 
considerations, and alternative options. Following this discussion 
and challenge we agreed with management’s revised approach.
We reviewed the year-end provision in both absolute terms and 
as a proportion of gross inventory, and also compared this to 
previous periods.
We also asked Internal Audit to confirm that during the year they had 
reviewed the inventory provision workings prepared by subsidiaries, 
confirming that there were no significant issues with the demand 
forecasts prepared by these teams.
Overall, we concluded that the provision was appropriate.
Intercompany receivables (Renishaw plc as an entity)
Description
Our review and conclusions
At the year-end, Renishaw plc (as an entity) had material 
receivables due from other Group companies. Due to uncertainty 
about the near-term cash flows in one of these Group companies, 
management have applied a significant level of judgement in 
determining the carrying value of the corresponding 
intercompany receivable in the Company balance sheet. 
There was no impact on the Consolidated financial statements. 
During the year, Renishaw plc recognised an impairment of 
£9.1m for intercompany receivables.
We reviewed management’s assessment, discussing and challenging 
the assumptions and key considerations. We discussed with 
management the range of outcomes they had considered.
Overall, we concluded that the impairment was reasonable.
Defined benefit (DB) pension scheme
Description
Our review and conclusions
To determine the value of the defined benefit pension schemes 
liabilities, management need to estimate the present value of the 
future obligations. Assumptions of discount rates, inflation rates 
and mortality rates are used in this estimate and are determined 
by management in consultation with independent actuaries. 
Management also need to determine the appropriate accounting 
treatment for past service costs.
We revised the assumptions of discount rates, inflation rates and 
mortality rates, including the movement in these since FY2023. 
We also confirmed with management that these assumptions had 
been determined in consultation with independent actuaries.
We also reviewed management’s accounting treatment for matters 
that may affect past service costs, including discussing professional 
advice obtained by management. We agreed with management’s 
conclusion on the following:
	
— that a contingent liability should be disclosed relating to a recent 
court case in the UK relating to contracted-out DB rights; and
	
— that a contingent liability should be disclosed relating to the 
potential liabilities arising from a defined contribution-underpin 
drafting issue in the UK DB scheme trust deed.
Going concern and viability
The Committee reviewed the financial modelling undertaken 
by management and which the Board used in making their 
going concern and viability assessments. This review included 
assessing the basis of the severe but plausible downside 
scenarios and how they addressed the principal risks, and the 
key assumptions and main mitigating actions included in each 
scenario. We confirmed with management that cash balances 
were positive in each month in the assessment period. We also 
reviewed the reverse stress tests that management had prepared 
for the period to 30 September 2025 and 30 September 2027 
for going concern and viability respectively, noting that the 
sustained falls in revenue (and therefore profit and operating 
cash flows) in the reverse stress tests are so low as to be 
highly unlikely.
The Committee also considered the other elements of the 
going concern and viability assessments, including the lack 
of significant external borrowing, the absence of covenants, 
and the current trading performance of the Group. Overall, 
the Committee concluded that the use of the going concern 
basis for preparing the financial statements is appropriate, 
and supported the viability assessment reviewed and 
authorised by the Board.
79
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
The Risk Committee combines this work with identifying trends 
and any new emerging risks, to draft the Group’s principal risks. 
During the year, the Audit Committee has considered and 
endorsed these principal risks presented by the Risk Committee. 
Internal controls
The Group’s systems and processes are designed to provide 
reasonable but not absolute assurance of:
	
— reduced risk of material misstatements, errors or losses;
	
— mitigation of risk that might cause a failure of business 
objectives;
	
— safeguarding assets against unauthorised use or disposal;
	
— maintenance of proper accounting records and the reliability 
of financial information used within the business for 
publication; and
	
— compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Internal controls are embedded throughout the business’s 
systems, and the Code of Conduct explains how we expect 
our people to behave with honesty and integrity and provides 
specific requirements on topics such as trade controls and 
legal compliance. Everyone in the business undertakes relevant 
training and assessment within three months of joining Renishaw. 
We further embed our expectation of people’s behaviour by 
having integrity as one of our values.
On a day-to-day basis, management is responsible for 
implementing internal controls. The Group Internal Control 
Manual sets out key financial processes and controls, mainly 
aimed at financial management and financial reporting. The 
manual is available to all employees and the Internal Audit team 
test subsidiary compliance with these controls during its audit 
work. Self-assessment of compliance with the Group’s policies 
and high-level controls is certified by each Group company on 
an annual basis, and this year we have also introduced more 
in-depth self-assessments on key financial controls.
During the year, management has continued to develop the 
financial controls framework, focusing on standardisation and 
documentation, and also focusing on plans to address the root 
cause of common themes. These plans include resourcing and 
training needs, as well as opportunities for Microsoft D365 to 
standardise and streamline internal processes and controls. 
The Committee oversees the effectiveness of other material 
controls, including operational and compliance controls, by 
receiving regular updates from our Responsible Renishaw Forum 
on compliance topics, including its assessment of the maturity of 
the control environment. In addition, principal risk owners provide 
confirmation to the Committee that they are not aware of any 
significant deficiencies in the key controls for their respective risks. 
Further work was performed by the Financial Controls team 
within Group Finance this year, which helped to enhance 
reporting to the Committee on the effectiveness of financial 
controls. This culminated in a clearer summary to the Committee 
of assurance, outcomes, and mitigation, and confirmed that the 
controls over financial reporting were effective overall in the year. 
Accounting policies and disclosures
The Committee reviewed significant accounting policies, and as 
noted earlier reviewed management’s change in approach to the 
estimate of the net realisable value of inventory. The Committee 
also reviewed management’s approach to presentation and 
disclosures, including the appropriateness of the Alternative 
Performance Measures (APMs).
Climate risk and Climate-related Financial Disclosures
The Committee reviewed this year’s Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures reporting, including reviewing an update from the 
Sustainability Reporting Manager on the drafting process and 
how management review this work, and we also received an 
update from the ESG Committee on its review process. The 
Committee also reviewed management’s work in assessing 
the impact of climate change on the financial statements.
Fair, balanced and understandable assessment
The Audit Committee reviewed whether the FY2024 Annual 
Report, taken as a whole, was fair, balanced and understandable 
and also whether it provided the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, 
business model and strategy. In making its assessment the 
Committee took into account:
	
— agreeing a suitable timetable for the production of the 
FY2024 Annual Report, agreed between the Finance team 
and the external auditors;
	
— using corporate reporting specialists to support the 
development of the Strategic Report and Corporate 
Governance Report;
	
— ensuring that the fair, balanced and understandable 
requirements were a key part of the Annual Report project 
team’s focus;
	
— involving senior management and the Board in preparing 
and reviewing the Annual Report, and explicitly asking 
whether they felt that the Annual Report was fair, balanced 
and understandable; and
	
— engaging our remuneration and legal advisers, and corporate 
reporting specialists, in reviewing the Annual Report. 
Following its review, the Audit Committee confirmed to the 
Board that the FY2024 Annual Report was fair, balanced and 
understandable, and the Board’s statement is set out on page 99.
Risk management and internal controls
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s approach to 
risk management and internal control. The Risk Committee has 
operational responsibility for risk management, and the Board 
has delegated responsibility to the Audit Committee for the 
oversight of this work and the effectiveness of internal controls.
Risk management
The Risk Committee identifies risks in two ways. Using a top-
down approach, the Chair of the Risk Committee interviews 
senior managers from across the Group, focusing on the most 
significant risks. The bottom-up approach involves reviewing 
the results from aggregating risk registers prepared by regional 
and product group managers. 
Audit Committee Report continued
80
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

The Group has a non-audit services policy, which was reviewed 
during the year to confirm its continued appropriateness. Some 
non-audit work is permitted by the policy in line with the FRC’s 
Guidance on Audit Committees and the requirements of the 
FRC’s Revised Ethical Standard 2019.
EY requires non-audit work to be approved by the Group’s lead 
audit partner before the work starts; approval is not granted if the 
lead audit partner concludes there is a risk to the independence 
and objectivity of the audit. Separation of EY’s specialist teams 
also ensures that members of the audit team do not perform 
non-audit work for the Group.
This year, EY’s fees for non-audit work were £27,000. This was 
for three engagements: Wotton Travel Limited’s annual ABTA 
reporting, a tax assurance engagement for Renishaw Metrology 
Systems Limited as required by local law, and a limited 
assurance for Renishaw AG.
Quality and effectiveness
The external auditors are invited to attend our Audit Committee 
meetings and report their plan for the full year audit and interim 
results review. I meet with the lead audit partner on a regular 
basis, and the Committee meets with them at least annually, 
without management present, to allow both Committee members 
and the external auditors to raise any issues directly. We also 
discuss their remit during these meetings.
The FRC’s ‘Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum 
Standard’ (‘the Standard’) sets out how the Committee should 
assess the effectiveness of the external audit, in the context 
of the Group’s circumstances. The Committee’s review of the 
effectiveness of the FY2024 external audit reflects the points 
that a Committee should undertake per the Standard, and took 
into account:
	
— the quality and scope of EY’s audit plan, and an evaluation 
of delivery and performance against the plan;
	
— EY’s identified risks to audit quality and how these had 
been addressed;
	
— the skills, mindset, efficiency and performance of the audit team;
	
— the communication between the Group and EY;
	
— EY’s understanding of the Group’s business and industry 
sector; and
	
— the FRC’s Audit Quality Inspection and Supervision report 
into EY, published in July 2024.
After considering these matters, our Committee was satisfied 
with the effectiveness of the year-end process and 
recommended to the Board that EY be reappointed at the 
Company’s AGM on 27 November 2024. 
The Committee also confirms that it has met all the relevant 
requirements of the Standard in FY2024. 
Juliette Stacey
Chair of the Audit Committee
11 September 2024
Whistleblowing
The Committee has oversight of the Group’s whistleblowing 
process. This is set out in more detail on page 61, with the 
Committee reviewing significant whistleblowing incidents 
and their outcomes.
Internal audit
Internal Audit work is performed in-house, led by the Group 
Internal Audit Manager. The Audit Committee agrees the 
Internal Audit team’s work plan at the start of each financial 
year and checks their progress against this plan during 
Committee meetings.
The team was expanded this year with the addition of a new 
team member in APAC, which allowed for additional in-person 
visits to some subsidiaries with multiple locations, in addition to 
the regular programme of scheduled overseas subsidiary visits. 
The team also performed a review of our Canadian subsidiary, 
following its implementation of Microsoft D365. 
The Committee receives periodic reports on audit work 
completed and discusses areas of significance in the audit 
findings. At each Committee meeting, the Group Internal Audit 
Manager provides updates on the responses to the findings 
from local teams.
At the end of each financial year, the Committee assesses 
Internal Audit’s effectiveness, considering if its work was 
effective by reviewing the volume, age and severity of findings, 
and then provides feedback to the Group Finance Director. 
The Audit Committee also reviews the responses to 
questionnaires completed by those teams audited in the year. 
Overall, the Committee agreed that this year’s Internal Audit 
work was consistent and comprehensive, but should be 
tailored in FY2025 to increase the focus and depth of work 
on high-risk matters.
External audit
Appointment, reappointment and tendering
EY was first appointed as our auditor at our 2016 AGM, and 
there have been two audit engagement partner rotations since 
then. We consider that the Company has complied with the 
Competition and Markets Authority’s Statutory Audit Services 
Order for the financial year under review. 
We currently expect to carry out our next audit tender process 
in 2026 for the FY2027 audit. As noted in the following 
sections, the Committee is satisfied with the external auditor’s 
independence, objectivity and effectiveness, and so considers 
this proposed tender timeline to be in the best interests of the 
Company’s shareholders.
Independence and objectivity
Both the Group and EY take action to ensure that EY are 
independent and objective. The previous lead audit partner 
rotated off the engagement following the conclusion of last 
year’s audit, and so this is the first year of the Committee 
working with the new lead audit partner, Helen McLeod-Jones. 
81
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
FY2024 employee bonus awards
As is our usual practice, a percentage of our annual profit 
has been set aside to invest in bonus awards for eligible 
Renishaw employees. Awards are dependent on seniority 
and performance, with the UK minimum award this year being 
£850 (pro-rated). Due to our Adjusted PBT for FY2024 being 
lower than FY2023, the average employee bonus award this 
year is less than it was last year.
Employee engagement
I act as the employee engagement ambassador and have 
attended meetings with HR and members of the Senior 
Leadership Team during the year to hear feedback received 
from consultations and engagement on reward initiatives. 
I have also benefited from reviewing the results of our employee 
engagement survey, and spent time with our people at our New 
Mills, UK site to discuss outcomes and collect further feedback. 
This engagement has provided me with the background and 
context required to help shape the reward framework for the 
Executive Directors and senior management. 
Our approach to remuneration for FY2025
Remuneration in FY2025 will be based on the Policy as 
approved by shareholders in November 2023.
Base salary
The Executive Directors received a pay increase of 5% (slightly 
below the average of the wider workforce at 6.7%) effective 
1 January 2024. Will Lee and Allen Roberts therefore receive 
salaries of £738,680 and £470,060 respectively. Sir David 
McMurtry's salary was increased to £804,500 from 1 January 
2024 to 30 June 2024. The Deputy Chairman and other Non-
executive Directors also received fee increases of 5% as set 
out on page 87. Base salaries will be reviewed in November/
December 2024, with any increase effective from January 2025, 
in line with pay reviews for our employees.
Annual incentive opportunity
We continue to operate a simple remuneration framework that 
was widely supported by 95% of our shareholders at the 2023 
AGM. However, we are mindful that the absence of a separate 
long-term incentive plan means that the overall value of the 
total package for Executive Directors at Renishaw is modest 
compared with businesses of similar size and complexity. 
The Policy includes flexibility to increase the annual incentive 
opportunity to up to 225% of salary to ensure we can continue 
to attract and retain high calibre executives and continue to offer 
an appropriately competitive overall package that is aligned to 
performance and good stewardship of the business. In light of 
the recent changes to the Board (Sir David McMurtry stepping 
down as Executive Chair, and Sir David Grant becoming 
Non-executive Chair) we recognise that there will be an increase 
in the responsibilities of Will Lee, our Chief Executive. We are 
fortunate to have Will leading the business. He brings strong 
direction, deep Renishaw and industry experience coupled with 
technical expertise. The Committee reviewed his incentive 
opportunity and decided that it wanted to recognise the impact of 
the Board changes and make a distinction between the incentive 
opportunity for the Chief Executive and Group Finance Director. 
Introduction
On behalf of the Board, I present our Directors’ Remuneration 
Report for FY2024. The Directors’ Remuneration Report, 
excluding the Policy summary, is subject to an advisory 
shareholder vote at our November 2024 AGM.
I would like to take this opportunity to personally thank 
Sir David McMurtry for his long and distinguished contribution 
as an Executive Director. I am looking forward to working with 
him in his new capacity as a Non-executive Director, and am 
delighted to welcome Richard McMurtry to the Board.
Remuneration in context of performance for 
FY2024 and the wider workforce
We have achieved solid strategic progress in a challenging trading 
environment, including weaker demand in the semiconductor 
market and adverse currency effects. Despite taking a more 
cautious approach to recruitment, we have continued to invest in 
our people and our innovative new products to create stronger 
market positions and support our growth objectives, while 
managing costs carefully and focusing on productivity.
The way in which the Committee took into account remuneration 
for the wider workforce is described on page 85.
FY2024 annual incentive opportunity for 
Executive Directors 
Our Executive Directors have continued to work closely with 
customers developing products that meet current and future 
needs, while making progress on our strategic objectives.
This year’s annual incentive was made up of two elements: 
a financial element worth 80% awarded against Adjusted profit 
before tax (PBT) targets and 20% against strategic objectives. 
The strategic objectives are set based on the targets agreed for 
the Executive Committee as a whole and these include matters 
relating to ESG, operational excellence, people and innovation. 
They are all linked to the strategy and values of the Group, 
which underpin our culture and drive behaviours consistent 
with our purpose. When setting targets, the Committee is aware 
of the possibility of inadvertently motivating irresponsible 
behaviour and sets the target framework with this in mind. 
For the Executive Directors, the strategic objectives element 
only pays out if the financial target is met.
Unfortunately, this year the threshold Adjusted PBT was not met. 
As a result, there is no award under the financial element of the 
annual incentive. In light of this, there will also be no award under 
the strategic objectives despite significant progress having been 
made. The full details of the targets and performance against 
the strategic objectives are explained in the Annual Report 
on remuneration. The Committee considered the formulaic 
outcome of the annual incentive opportunity and was satisfied 
that it was appropriate; accordingly, no discretion was exercised.
The bonus for the Senior Leadership Team is determined 
by performance against the same metrics as the Executive 
Directors. However, in their case, where the financial targets are 
not met, they have the opportunity to earn an award based on 
the achievement against the strategic objectives. For FY2024 
this award will be 15.8% of total bonus opportunity. 
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Committee Chair’s statement
82
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

In line with the Policy, for achieving an appropriately stretching 
level of threshold performance 10% of the bonus based on 
Adjusted PBT will be earned.
In his new role as a Non-executive Director, Sir David McMurtry 
will not participate in the FY2025 annual incentive opportunity.
Looking ahead – key focus areas for 
the Committee
During FY2025 our key focus will be on ensuring that the Policy 
continues to support success, specifically that we achieve the 
targeted profit number and the strategic objectives drive the right 
behaviours and outcomes for the longer term. We will also focus 
on ensuring we retain talented people by:
	
— implementing a workplan following the feedback from our 
employee engagement survey;
	
— further reviewing incentives throughout the Group; and
	
— continuing to deliver leadership and management 
development programmes that capitalise on our strength 
of offering early responsibility and interesting work.
In implementing our Policy, our aim is to always consider our 
stakeholders, including our people and shareholders, and 
to remunerate executives fairly and responsibly. We remain 
committed to a responsible approach to executive pay, 
as I trust this Directors’ Remuneration Report demonstrates.
For FY2025, we have decided to utilise some, but not all, 
of the additional variable pay headroom for Will, increasing 
his maximum opportunity from 150% of salary to 200%. 
Any additional award will be delivered in deferred shares. 
This will ensure retention and strong alignment with the 
experience of shareholders. As stated in the Policy, the increase 
will be accompanied by an enhancement of the deferral and 
recovery provisions: half of the deferred shares will be subject to 
enhanced recovery provisions, specifically satisfactory personal 
performance together with financial performance and strategic 
progress as judged by the Committee exercising its discretion 
over the period of the deferral. The annual incentive opportunity 
for our Group Finance Director will remain at 150% of salary 
(i.e. unchanged from FY2024). The table below summarises 
the operation of the FY2025 annual incentive arrangements.
Metrics for FY2025 will be materially the same, but specific 
targets for the strategic element of the incentive opportunity for 
FY2025 will include new product development against gated 
milestones, product launches meeting sales and financial 
targets, delivery of environmental targets, corporate initiatives, 
and retention of employees. The Senior Leadership Team will 
have the same Adjusted PBT targets and strategic objectives 
as the Executive Directors to ensure everyone is working to the 
same targets. The strategic objectives for FY2025 represent 
20% of the annual incentive opportunity, to align executive 
remuneration with delivery of the Group strategy and are linked 
to the values of the Group which underpin our culture and drive 
behaviours. The strategic alignment of each element of pay 
is set out in the full Policy and summarised on pages 86 and 87.
Executive Directors’ FY2025 annual incentive arrangements
Maximum opportunity
% of bonus paid in cash
% of bonus deferred into shares for three years
Will Lee
200% of salary.
37.5% of the bonus 
earned (i.e. up to 75% 
of salary) paid in cash.
62.5% of the bonus earned (i.e. up to 125% of salary) paid in deferred shares.
The deferred shares would be subject to a three-year deferral period. Half of 
the deferred shares would be subject to continued employment, while the other 
half would be subject to continued employment and the enhanced recovery 
provisions set out above.
Allen 
Roberts
150% of salary.
50% of the bonus 
earned (i.e. up to 75% 
of salary) paid in cash.
50% of the bonus earned (i.e. up to 75% of salary).
The deferred shares have a three-year deferral period and are subject to 
continued employment.
On behalf of the Committee, thank you for your continued 
support. As always, I am happy to answer questions or 
receive feedback; please contact me at 
CompanySecretary@Renishaw.com.
Catherine Glickman
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
11 September 2024 
83
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
During FY2024, Karen Atterbury, Interim Company Secretary, 
acted as secretary to the Committee. From 29 July 2024, 
Kasim Hussain, Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, 
has acted as secretary to the Committee. Executive Directors 
may attend Committee meetings by invitation (to advise on the 
remuneration and performance of senior management and 
to take part in specific discussions), although they do not take 
part in any specific discussions that directly relate to their 
own remuneration. 
Advisers
The Committee uses independent advisers as needed and our 
current adviser is Deloitte LLP (Deloitte). Deloitte is a founder 
member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and, as such, 
voluntarily operates under the code of conduct in relation to 
executive remuneration consulting in the UK. The Committee 
has undertaken a review and continues to believe that the 
advice received from Deloitte is objective and independent. 
Total professional fees and expenses paid to Deloitte for advice 
received was £29,900.
Deloitte was appointed by the Committee in March 2021 
following a competitive tender process and has provided 
other remuneration advice during FY2024.
Key activities
Governance
	
— Reviewed the output from the FY2023 effectiveness evaluation.
	
— Took part in the FY2024 effectiveness evaluation.
	
— Reviewed and approved the Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Remuneration Policy and its operation
	
— Approved the Executive Directors’ and Senior Leadership 
Team salaries.
	
— Considered the achievement of the financial and strategic 
objectives for FY2024 and approved the outcomes for FY2024. 
	
— Approved the wider employee pay review.
	
— Approved the structure of the annual bonus plan for FY2025 
and associated targets.
	
— Considered the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, agreeing that 
no changes were required for FY2025 following the approval by 
the Company’s shareholders of the Policy in November 2023.
People
	
— Conducted a wide review of the elements of remuneration 
available to the wider workforce. 
	
— Reviewed employee turnover statistics.
	
— Approved people objectives for FY2024.
	
— Reviewed the operation of the Leadership and Management 
Development programmes.
	
— Reviewed and approved the questions to be circulated as part 
of the employee engagement survey.
	
— Reviewed the gender pay gap statistics.
	
— Approved the employee bonus proposal for FY2024.
What does the Committee do?
The Committee is responsible for setting competitive 
remuneration arrangements and incentive structures that 
attract, retain and motivate talented people. These responsibilities 
are set by the Board and formally recorded in the terms of 
reference, which are available on the Company’s website at 
www.renishaw.com/corporategovernance. 
Specifically, the Committee is responsible for:
	
— designing the framework and policy for executive 
remuneration;
	
— determining the remuneration for each of the Executive 
Directors and other senior management;
	
— ensuring that suitable financial and strategic objectives 
underpin reward structures and encourage strong 
performance; and
	
— reviewing workforce remuneration and related policies.
To avoid duplication, the table below cross refers to 
disclosures given elsewhere of how we have sought to 
comply with Provision 41 of the UK Corporate Governance Code. 
Topic
Page(s)
An explanation of the strategic rationale for Executive 
Directors’ remuneration policies, structures and any 
performance metrics.
82-83,
86-87
Reasons why the remuneration is appropriate using 
internal and external measures, including pay ratios 
and pay gaps.
91
A description, with examples, of how the Remuneration 
Committee has addressed the factors in Provision 40.
85
Whether the Remuneration Policy operated as 
intended in terms of company performance and 
quantum, and, if not, what changes are necessary.
88
What engagement has taken place with shareholders 
and the impact this has had on Remuneration Policy 
and outcomes.
85
What engagement with the workforce has taken place 
to explain how executive remuneration aligns with 
wider company pay policy.
43, 82,
85
To what extent discretion has been applied to 
remuneration outcomes and the reasons why.
n/a
Members
All members of the Committee are Independent Non-executive 
Directors: Catherine Glickman (Chair), Juliette Stacey, Stephen 
Wilson, and Professor Dame Karen Holford (with effect from 
1 September 2023). Sir David Grant was a member of the 
Committee in FY2024, although he stepped down from the 
Committee on 30 June 2024 as a result of his appointment as 
Interim Non-executive Chairman. The Committee met six times 
in FY2024 and we set out on this page a summary of the topics 
discussed in those meetings.
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Committee members, advisers and meetings
84
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

of the UK workforce as set out on page 86. By 1 January 2025, 
these will be fully aligned with that available to the UK workforce 
as a whole.
Statement of consideration of shareholder views
The Committee values the insight received from its engagement 
activities with our shareholders and takes all feedback received 
seriously. In FY2024, on behalf of the Board, Sir David Grant 
engaged with some of our largest institutional shareholders and 
proxy voting agencies (as detailed on page 24). A number of 
these discussions included aspects of remuneration, which 
Sir David Grant reported back to the Board.
Principles underlying our remuneration 
framework
The Committee has reviewed our Executive Director Remuneration 
Policy and practices in the context of the Governance Code, 
particularly Provision 40, as follows:
Factor
How did we address this factor?
Clarity and 
simplicity
We operate simple and transparent reward 
mechanisms that are well understood by our 
investors and workforce. We consulted with 
investors in relation to the Policy and engage 
with the workforce on remuneration as described 
on pages 43, 82, 85.
Risk
There is an appropriate mix of fixed and variable 
pay, and financial and strategic objectives. 
The new Policy maintains robust measures 
to manage risk and to ensure alignment with 
long-term shareholder interests including: 
(i) discretion to override formulaic outcomes; 
(ii) malus and clawback provisions; (iii) minimum 
shareholding requirement and bonus deferral 
into shares; and (iv) in-employment and post-
employment shareholding requirements.
Predictability
The charts on page 87 clearly show the amounts 
that could be earned by the Executive Directors 
in the next financial year.
Proportionality
There is a clear link between individual awards, 
delivery of strategy and Group performance. 
Payouts from the annual bonus require 
performance against stretching targets. The 
Committee assesses performance holistically 
at the end of the period, taking into account 
performance against the financial and strategic 
objectives. There is no payout if the threshold 
financial objectives are not met. The Committee 
has full discretion to alter the payout levels to 
ensure payments are appropriately aligned with the 
underlying Company and individual performance.
Alignment 
with culture
The Committee ensures that targets for 
performance-based remuneration are linked to 
the KPIs set at Board level.
The strategic objectives for FY2024 are set out 
on page 89 and are all linked to our strategy and 
values, which underpin our culture. The weighting 
of the FY2025 strategic objectives (20%) further 
encourages the successful implementation of 
our strategy and drives behaviours consistent 
with our purpose, values and culture.
Committee meeting attendance record
Committee member
Attended 
Catherine Glickman (Chair)
6/6
Sir David Grant
6/6
Professor Dame Karen Holford*
4/4
Juliette Stacey
6/6
Stephen Wilson
6/6
*Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed with effect from 1 September 
2023, and so was not eligible to attend the first two meetings in FY2024.
Statement of consideration of employment 
conditions elsewhere in the Group
When the Committee makes decisions on Executive Director 
pay, it also takes into account the policies and practices in 
place for the wider workforce.
When considering the annual salary review, the average base 
salary increase awarded to UK employees provides a guide 
when determining the salaries of the Executive Directors. 
The Committee also reviews the remuneration policies and, 
this year, undertook a broad review of each element of 
remuneration available to the wider UK workforce. This allows 
the Committee to ensure sufficient alignment between the 
remuneration policies of the wider workforce and the Executive 
Directors, and to satisfy itself that the approach taken is fair and 
reasonable based on market conditions and practice, and the 
best interests of shareholders. It also gives additional context 
for making informed decisions on executive pay, and ensures 
performance objectives are aligned with our culture and strategy. 
The Committee found that the broader framework was operating 
well and that there was a clear, progressive approach at all 
seniority levels.
To reward and recognise performance this financial year, 
eligible employees received an annual bonus paying out 
a UK minimum of £850 (pro-rated). During FY2024 we 
continued working on our goal to reach our targets for pay by 
aligning pay to market-competitive rates. The Chair and Group 
Human Resources Director also regularly update the Committee 
about feedback from engagement activities, turnover rates and 
reasons for leaving so that it remains vigilant and can make 
informed decisions. Further details of the work carried out on 
pay in FY2024 and priorities for FY2025 are on pages 82 and 83.
While the Executive Directors’ remuneration package is more 
heavily weighted towards variable and share-based payments 
compared to our wider workforce, the Committee has increased 
the alignment of our Senior Leadership Team remuneration 
to shareholder interests through our Senior Leadership Team 
Annual Bonus Plan. The bonus for the Senior Leadership Team 
is determined by performance against the same metrics as the 
Executive Directors. However, in their case, where the financial 
targets are not met, they have the opportunity to earn an award 
based on the achievement against the strategic objectives. 
The Committee is also involved in setting the remuneration 
for our Senior Leadership Team. 
The pension arrangements for the Executive Directors are 
currently aligned to those available to longer-serving members 
85
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Purpose and link to strategy
Implementation in FY2024
Implementation in FY2025
Base salary
To provide a competitive 
remuneration package to 
motivate and retain Executive 
Directors of the required 
calibre to help the Group 
meet its objectives to deliver 
the Group’s strategy.
Salaries were reviewed in November 2023 and increases 
of 5% were effective from 1 January 2024: Will Lee 
therefore receives £738,680, Allen Roberts £470,060 
and Sir David McMurtry £804,500 (until 30 June 2024, 
when he stepped down as Executive Chairman). This 
was slightly lower than the average increase effective 
January 2024 for the wider workforce at 6.7%. 
Salaries will be reviewed in November/
December 2024 and any changes will be 
effective as of 1 January 2025. 
Sir David McMurtry was appointed 
as a Non-executive Director from 1 July 
2024, and so for FY2025 he will receive the 
same fee as other Non-executive Directors.
Benefits
To provide market-competitive 
benefits that motivate and 
retain Executive Directors and 
enable them to give maximum 
attention to their role.
Benefits provided this year included a car allowance and 
private medical insurance. The total values are set out in 
the Annual Report on remuneration on page 88.
No changes are anticipated for FY2025.
As he is no longer an Executive Director, 
Sir David McMurtry will not receive benefits 
in FY2025.
Pension
To provide a pension 
contribution/allowance in line 
with the wider workforce of the 
home country of the Executive 
Director and to motivate and 
retain Executive Directors of 
the required quality to meet 
the Group’s objectives.
Will Lee and Allen Roberts received pension 
contributions or cash equivalents equal to contributions 
available to long-serving employees. 
Sir David McMurtry receives no pension contribution 
or allowance in lieu.
Pension contributions for Executive 
Directors will be aligned to those available 
to the majority of the UK wider workforce 
(currently 9% of salary) with effect from 
1 January 2025.
Annual incentive opportunity (comprising cash bonus and deferred equity awards)
To incentivise and reward 
execution of the Group’s 
objectives, reward 
outperformance and 
encourage Executive 
Director share ownership.
	
— The maximum opportunity for FY2024 was 150% 
of salary for non-founder Executive Directors and 
100% of salary for Sir David McMurtry. For the 
non-founder Executive Directors, 50% of any bonus 
earned will be deferred into shares and any award 
made to Sir David McMurtry will be made in cash.
	
— For FY2024 the incentive was made up of two 
elements: a financial element worth 80% awarded 
against Adjusted profit before tax (PBT) targets and 
20% against strategic objectives. The weighting 
had doubled from FY2023 (10%) to ensure an 
appropriate and meaningful proportion of the bonus 
was based on the achievement of specific strategic 
drivers of sustainable value creation.
	
— Unfortunately, this year the threshold Adjusted PBT 
was not met. As a result, there is no award under the 
financial element of the annual incentive. In light of 
this, there will also be no award under the strategic 
objectives despite significant progress having been 
made (see page 89 for details).
No change in maximum opportunity or 
deferral for Allen Roberts. The maximum 
opportunity for Will Lee will be 200% of 
salary and 62.5% of any bonus earned 
will be deferred into shares (further details 
on page 83).
The measures will continue to be 80% 
awarded against Adjusted PBT and 
20% against strategic objectives, which 
relate to innovation, environment and 
social, and governance and operations. 
These drive long-term growth, new 
product development and our work on 
sustainability, specifically on our 
environmental targets, and are all linked 
to the strategy and values of the Group, 
which underpin our culture and drive 
behaviours consistent with our purpose. 
Remuneration Policy: Implementation in FY2024 and Plan for FY2025
Ahead of the Annual Report on remuneration, we have summarised below the key remuneration outcomes for FY2024, 
the key elements of the Remuneration Policy approved at the 2023 AGM and how we intend to implement the Policy in FY2025. 
The Committee confirms that the Policy operated as intended throughout FY2024. The full Remuneration Policy can be found at 
www.renishaw.com/en/financial-reports--22583.
The 2023 Policy was determined by the Committee after reviewing the impact of the 2020 Policy, key governance factors, market 
practice, and after taking account of shareholder feedback arising out of the consultation undertaken in June 2023. The Committee 
further reviewed the Policy against the six themes set out in Provision 40 of the UK Corporate Governance Code as described 
on page 85.
To ensure conflicts of interest are managed, the Committee ensures no Director determines the Policy regarding their 
own remuneration. 
Summary of the Remuneration Policy and its implementation
86
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Purpose and link to strategy
Implementation in FY2024
Implementation in FY2025
Minimum shareholding guideline
Supports the alignment of 
Executive Director and 
shareholder interests.
Each Executive Director is expected to build up and 
maintain a level of share ownership of at least 200% of 
base salary. Will Lee and Allen Roberts have not yet met 
the minimum shareholding guideline (as shown below). 
No changes are anticipated for FY2025.
Executive Directors’ shareholdings (as of 30 June 2024) 
The table below shows the Executive Directors’ shareholdings against the minimum shareholding guidelines for Executive Directors 
(2x salary). In line with the Policy approved at the 2023 AGM, shares subject to Deferred Annual Equity Incentive Plan (DAEIP) awards 
(which are subject to continued employment but not to any further performance conditions) count towards the guidelines on a net of 
assumed tax basis, resulting in an increase in the extent to which Will Lee and Allen Roberts have met the guideline compared to the 
position at the end of FY2023. Sir David McMurtry has achieved his minimum shareholding guidelines, and Will Lee and Allen Roberts 
are in the process of building towards theirs.
Executive Directors (as of 30 June 2024)
Sir David McMurtry
Will Lee
Allen Roberts
Shares
26,377,291
7,695
6,840
Shares subject to DAEIP awards (net of assumed tax)
n/a
11,967
8,085
Actual (× salary)
1,213.1
0.985
1.175
Post-employment shareholding policy
Supports the principle of 
long-term share ownership 
and alignment of interests 
with shareholders.
Executive Directors (in FY2024, excluding Sir David McMurtry) will be required to maintain a personal 
shareholding in Renishaw at a level of at least the lower of their actual shareholding and the level of their 
minimum shareholding guideline for one year after they step down from the Board, and 50% of that level 
for a further year. 
Non-executive Director fees
To provide a competitive fee 
to attract and retain Non-
executive Directors of the 
required calibre to meet the 
Group’s objectives.
Basic fees were subject to the aggregate limit set in 
accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, 
as amended by shareholder approval from time to time. 
Fees were reviewed in November 2023 and increased 
by 5% to £78,750 with effect from 1 January 2024. 
None of the Non-executive Directors received any 
additional fees or bonuses.
Fees will be reviewed in November/
December 2024 and any changes will be 
effective as of 1 January 2025. As of 1 July 
2024, Sir David McMurtry's and Richard 
McMurtry’s basic fees were aligned with 
those of the other Non-executive Directors 
and Sir David Grant’s fee is now £325,000. 
Minimum
100%
834
On-target
53%
47%
1,572
Maximum
36%
64%
2,311
Minimum
100%
538
On-target
60%
40%
891
Maximum
43%
57%
1,243
Annual incentive opportunity
Minimum remuneration
Will Lee
Allen Roberts
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
£’000
Base salary
Taxable benefits
Pension
2023
2024
Allen Roberts Group Finance Director
2023
2024
Will Lee Chief Executive
2023
2024
Sir David McMurtry Executive Chairman
Total remuneration
Bar chart A below shows 
a comparison of the 
Executive Directors’ 
total remuneration 
(including a breakdown 
of the components) 
for FY2024 and FY2023.
Illustrations of application of Remuneration Policy in FY2025 (£’000)
The bar charts labelled B below for each Executive Director show remuneration for the financial year ending 
30 June 2025 under different performance scenarios: (i) the minimum remuneration payable in respect of 
salary, benefits and pension; (ii) the remuneration payable if performance is on target and in line with the 
Company’s expectations; and (iii) the remuneration payable if the maximum cash bonus and deferred annual 
equity incentive is payable.
Note that deferred equity incentive plan awards granted in a year will not normally vest until the third 
anniversary of the date of grant, and the projected value excludes the impact of share price movement. 
As the Executive Directors are not in receipt of a long-term incentive, the fourth scenario under the reporting 
regulations (requiring the impact on the value of long-term incentives of 50% share price growth over the 
performance period) is not shown; this is unchanged from the third scenario above.
A
	
B
87
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
This section of the report sets out the remuneration of the Directors in FY2024. Details of how the Committee intends to implement 
the Remuneration Policy for FY2025 are set out on pages 86 and 87. During FY2024, the Policy operated as intended in terms of 
performance and quantum. The information on pages 88 to 94 has been audited where required under the regulations and is 
indicated as audited where applicable.
This Remuneration Report has been prepared in accordance with Schedule 8 to the Large and Medium-sized Companies and 
Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended), UKLR 6.6 of the UK Listing Rules and the Governance Code.
Single total figure table (audited) – Executive Directors 
Salary
Benefits
Pension
Bonus
Total fixed
remuneration
Total variable
remuneration
Total
remuneration
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
FY
2024
£’000
FY
2023
£’000
Sir David McMurtry
785
766
3
3
n/a
n/a
0
0
788
769
0
0
788
769
Will Lee
721
704
21
21
79
77
0
0
821
802
0
0
821
802
Allen Roberts
459
448
20
20
50
49
0
0
529
517
0
0
529
517
Total
1,965
1,918
44
44
129
126
0
0
2,138
2,088
0
0
2,138
2,088
Single total figure table (audited) – Non-executive Directors
Fees
Expenses
Total remuneration1
FY2024
£’000
FY2023
£’000
FY2024
£’000
FY2023
£’000
FY2024
£’000
FY2023
£’000
John Deer
77
75
0
0
77
75
Catherine Glickman
77
75
0
0
77
75
Sir David Grant
77
75
0
0
77
75
Juliette Stacey
77
75
0
0
77
75
Stephen Wilson
77
75
0
0
77
75
Professor Dame Karen Holford
642
n/a
0
n/a
64
n/a
Total
449
375
0
0
449
375
1	 The Non-executive Directors are not eligible for any variable remuneration and only receive fixed remuneration.
2	 Professor Dame Karen Holford was appointed as a Non-executive Director on 1 September 2023. Therefore, these figures reflect remuneration received 
during the period from 1 September 2023 to 30 June 2024.
Benefits
Car allowance
£’000
Private medical cover applies to all Executive Directors 
and insurance on personal cars apply to some Directors
£’000
Sir David McMurtry
0
3
Will Lee
20
1
Allen Roberts
20
0
Annual Report on remuneration
88
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Annual incentive outcomes for FY2024
The incentive opportunity is based on financial and strategic objectives, although the award is only payable provided the financial 
threshold is met (irrespective of performance against the strategic objectives).
The financial objective, based on stretching Adjusted PBT targets, comprised 80% of the award; the strategic objectives comprised 20%.
The threshold Adjusted PBT target was not met, and therefore the strategic objectives did not pay out. Thus, there will be no award 
under the annual incentive programme for FY2024. 
Full details of the financial objectives, strategic objectives and performance against them are set out in the following tables.
Financial objectives
Threshold
Stretch
Maximum
Achieved in FY2024
Adjusted PBT 
£140.0m
£165.0m
£175.0m
£122.6m
% of bonus payable for Adjusted PBT performance 
20%
60%
80%
0%
The Adjusted PBT for FY2024 was £122.6m. This result is less than the threshold target set by the Committee and therefore no 
bonus was payable in FY2024. In assessing the bonus payouts, the Committee considered the experience of other stakeholders 
and the wider workforce and determined that no discretion would be applied. 
Strategic objectives
Performance against the strategic targets is set out in the table below:
Strategic objective
Outcome of objective
% of bonus
payable
% of bonus
paid out
Group strategic direction 
Deliver the Group strategic 
plan for FY2024
	
— Engaged with analysts, shareholders and potential investors on 
a regular basis.
	
— Grew AGILITY and Equator sales to target customers.
	
— Leadership review of strategic objectives and refocus on 4 key areas.
20%
Out-turn 
assessed 
as 79% of 
maximum 
under strategic 
element of 
bonus.
0% earned as 
threshold level 
of financial 
performance 
not met.
Innovation
Drive innovation with 
a focus on new product 
development and disruptive 
technology
	
— Improved R&D productivity.
	
— Achieved specific milestones for key flagship products.
	
— Monitored external disruptive technologies and potential 
opportunities.
People and culture
Develop our people’s 
leadership, development 
and capability
	
— Implemented an employee engagement survey, set base line 
employee engagement score and started to develop a plan to 
improve it.
	
— Implemented core competencies and now developing functional 
competencies across our global roles.
	
— Implemented succession plans across the Group for our 
management and key critical roles.
Sustainability 
Deliver our sustainability 
plan, developing the 
Scope 3 reduction plan and 
delivering Scope 1 and 2 
emissions reductions
	
— Published goals and created a five-to-ten-year plan using the 
Science-based Targets initiative (SBTi) framework and tracked first 
year of progress.
	
— We are on track with our Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets.
Productivity
Increase capacity 
and productivity 
of manufacturing 
facilities and progress 
implementation of 
Microsoft Dynamics 365
	
— In relation to manufacturing, developed both our procurement and 
logistics strategy.
	
— Established a disaster recovery process map with an associated rota 
of scheduled rehearsals to check their validity. 
	
— Established our software subscription sales infrastructure.
	
— Delivered the first iterations of Microsoft Dynamics 365 in the 
business, learning lessons on implementation.
	
— Miskin expansion progressing within budget and meeting agreed 
deadlines. The first additional building is fully commissioned and 
operational as a dedicated assembly facility. The second building 
structure is complete, and will be commissioned when the additional 
space is needed.
89
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Annual Report on remuneration continued
Total pension entitlements
Will Lee is a member of our closed UK defined benefit scheme. The normal retirement age is 65. On death, pension benefits would 
pass to that member’s dependants.
Since the closure of the defined benefit scheme, contributions have been made to a defined contribution scheme or paid in cash.
At 30 June 2024
Value of defined benefit 
pension entitlement
£’000 per year 
Pension 
contributions in 
respect of FY2024*
Will Lee
11
Paid in cash
*As disclosed in the single figure table.
Payments to past Directors
No payments were made to past Directors during the year.
Loss of office payments
There were no loss of office payments during the year.
Performance graph
The graph below shows our TSR performance, compared with the FTSE 250 Index. The Committee believes this is the most 
appropriate broad index for comparison, as Renishaw is a member of this index. TSR performance was rebased to 100 
at 30 June 2014.
TSR performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Renishaw
Value of £100 invested on 30 June 2014
FTSE 250
Financial year ended 30 June
90
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Chief Executive total remuneration
The table below sets out information relating to the remuneration of the Chief Executive for each of the years in question:
Year
FY
2015
FY
2016
FY
2017
FY
20181
FY
2019
FY
2020
FY
2021
FY
2022
FY
2023
FY
2024
Will Lee (from 1 February 2018)
Single figure of total remuneration (£’000)
594
653
601
1,488
1,770
802
821
Annual incentive payout (includes annual cash bonus 
and deferred equity incentive) % of maximum
95
0
0
100
100
0
0
Long-term incentive vesting % of maximum
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Sir David McMurtry (until 31 January 2018)
Single figure of total remuneration (£’000)2
1,298
668
1,207
818
Annual bonus payout % of maximum
100
0
77
100
Long-term incentive vesting % of maximum
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1	 The remuneration shown is on a pro-rated basis for the period when Sir David McMurtry stepped down and Will Lee took office to the end of the financial year.
2	 Represents the total remuneration received by Sir David McMurtry in relation to this role. 
Chief Executive pay ratio
The table below sets out the Chief Executive pay ratios as at 30 June in the financial years 2020 to 2024. The report will build up 
over time to show a rolling 10-year period. The ratios compare the single total figure of remuneration of the Chief Executive with the 
equivalent figures for the lower quartile (P25), median (P50) and upper quartile (P75) employees. Ratios are also presented using 
base salary only. 
Option B has been selected as this method of calculation is considered to be the most robust method of identifying the individual 
reference points in a Group, such as Renishaw, with multiple operating segments.
Total remuneration 
Financial year
Employee remuneration
Pay ratio
P25
P50
P75
P25
P50
P75
FY2024
£36,152
£46,499
£67,426
22.7
17.7
12.2
FY2023 
£27,484
£45,554
£55,940
29.2
17.6
14.3
FY2022
£31,099
£42,246
£48,457
56.9 
41.9 
36.5 
FY2021
£28,438
£37,720
£45,170
52.3
39.4
32.9
FY2020
£27,476
£35,619
£51,563
21.9
16.9
11.6
Base salary
Financial year
Employee remuneration
Pay ratio
P25
P50
P75
P25
P50
P75
FY2024
£32,000
£40,323
£58,015
22.5
17.9
12.4
FY2023 
£24,134
£39,100
£48,205
29.1
18.0
14.6
FY2022
£27,213
£36,276
£41,331
24.6 
18.5 
16.2 
FY2021
£24,420
£32,670
£42,480
23.0
17.2
13.2
FY2020*
£24,650
£32,634
£47,092
20.5
15.5
10.7
*Where necessary, adjustments were made to the underlying data to reflect a reduction in working hours during April 2020 to June 2020 in connection with the 
COVID-19 pandemic. The reductions in salary and employer pension contributions during this time have been added back to give a full-time equivalent figure. 
No other adjustments were made to the underlying data.
The base salary for the Chief Executive increased by 5% in January 2024. This was lower than the average for the wider workforce. 
The base salary pay ratios for P25, P50 and P75 have all reduced this year compared with the FY2023 ratios, primarily reflecting 
higher average pay increases for employees compared with the Chief Executive. The P25 ratio shows the most significant reduction, 
reflecting our approach of targeting higher pay increases for those employees in the lower quartile.
The ratios for total remuneration have followed a similar trend to the base salary ratios, with the Chief Executive receiving no bonus 
in either FY2023 or FY2024. 
Taking into account the above, the Committee considers the median pay ratio consistent with the Company’s approach to pay and 
reward. The Committee will continue to monitor the ratios on an annual basis.
91
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Annual Report on remuneration continued
Statement of Directors’ shareholding and share interests
The interests of Directors and their connected persons in the Company’s ordinary shares as at 30 June 2024 are set out below. 
There have been no changes to those interests between 30 June 2024 and the date of signing of this Annual Report. 
Number of ordinary
shares of 20p each
beneficially owned
(as at 30 June 2024)
Unvested and 
subject to continued
employment
(awarded under the DAEIP)
Minimum
shareholding
guideline
Current 
shareholding*
Minimum
shareholding
guideline met
Sir David McMurtry
26,377,291
n/a
2× salary
1,213.1× salary
Yes
Will Lee
7,695
22,580
2× salary
0.985× salary
Building
Allen Roberts
6,840
15,255
2× salary
1.175× salary
Building
John Deer
12,076,790
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Catherine Glickman
675
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Sir David Grant
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Juliette Stacey
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Stephen Wilson
1,500
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Professor Dame Karen Holford
–
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
*Current shareholdings for comparison with the shareholding requirements for Executive Directors are calculated based on annualised salary as at 
30 June 2024 and by reference to the closing share price on 30 June 2024 (3,700p) and, in line with the Policy, include the net of assumed tax shares 
subject to DAEIP awards. 
DAEIP awards granted during the year
No DAEIP awards were granted during the year.
Percentage change in remuneration of the Directors
The following table sets out the percentage change in the Directors’ remuneration, compared with the percentage change in 
average remuneration to Renishaw plc employees from FY2019 to FY2024. The figures shown in the table below refer to the base 
salary actually received by each Director; therefore, these figures do not include the fees (whether all or part) that were waived for 
any financial years. Where an item is not relevant for that Director or where it has changed from or to a zero figure in the timeframe, 
the change is shown as not applicable. All percentages in the table are rounded to the nearest whole number and all references to 
years are to the financial years. Where appropriate, footnotes to the equivalent table in reports for previous years provide further 
information in relation to the changes for those years.
Salaries/Fees
Benefits/Expenses
Annual bonus
2023
/24
%
2022
/23
%
2021
/22
%
2020
/21
%
2019
/20
%
2023
/24
%
2022
/23
%
2021
/22
%
2020
/21
%
2019
/20
%
2023
/24
%
2022
/23
%
2021
/22
%
2020
/21
%
2019
/20
%
Sir David McMurtry
3
5
n/a
n/a
-23
0
0
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
2
n/a
0
Will Lee
2
5
19
11
-8
0
5
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
19
n/a
0
Allen Roberts
3
5
2
5
-2
0
0
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
2
n/a
0
John Deer
3
7
n/a
n/a
-38
12.9
-21
-37
-94
-43
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0
Catherine Glickman
3
7
25
5
6
n/a
n/a
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Sir David Grant
3
7
25
5
-4
n/a
n/a
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Juliette Stacey
3
114
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Stephen Wilson
3 1,186
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Professor Dame Karen Holford
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Renishaw plc employee (average)
8
11
9
1
3
11
4
4
1
1  -10.9
-15
22
n/a
n/a
92
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Executive Directors serving as non-executive directors of other companies
During the year none of the Executive Directors were paid to serve as a non-executive director of any other company. 
Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table sets out the total amount spent in FY2024 and FY2023 on remuneration to all Group employees and on 
dividends to shareholders:
FY2024
£’000
FY2023
£’000
Change
%
Employee remuneration
288,516
278,847
3
Shareholder dividends paid*
55,412
53,407
4
*Does not include dividends declared but not yet paid.
Except as shown above, no other distributions have been made to shareholders, or other payments or uses of profit or cash flow, 
that affect the understanding of the relative importance of spend on pay. 
Executive Director service contracts
The Executive Directors’ service contracts are for an indefinite period and require 12 months’ notice of termination by either party. 
There are no obligations in any Executive Director’s service contract that would require the Company to pay a specific amount of 
compensation for loss of office. 
The Executive Directors’ service contracts reflect our policy regarding notice periods. No payment will be made for a termination 
by the Company for a breach by the Executive Director of their service contract. In other cases, payment in lieu of notice will be 
considered up to the 12 months’ notice period to cover base salary, benefits and pension contributions. If additional compensation 
must be considered, such as on a settlement agreement, the Committee will consider all relevant commercial factors affecting 
that case. Executive Directors’ service contracts are available for inspection at our registered office upon written request to the 
Company Secretary.
Executive Director
Date of service contract 
during FY2024
Sir David McMurtry
18 October 2018*
Will Lee
1 June 2020
Allen Roberts
20 April 2021
*Sir David McMurtry stepped down as Executive Chairman on 30 June 2024.
Non-executive Director letters of appointment
The Non-executive Directors’ letters of appointment require one month’s notice of termination by either party. There are no 
obligations in any Non-executive Director’s letter of appointment that would require the Company to pay a specific amount of 
compensation for loss of office. 
Non-executive Directors’ letters of appointment are available for inspection at our registered office upon written request to the 
Company Secretary.
Non-executive Director
Date first appointed to the Board
Expiry date of current term of office
John Deer
1 July 1974
31 January 2025
Catherine Glickman
1 August 2018
1 August 2027
Sir David Grant
25 April 2012
25 April 2025
Professor Dame Karen Holford
1 September 2023
1 September 2026
Juliette Stacey
1 January 2022
1 January 2025
Stephen Wilson
1 June 2022
1 June 2025
93
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Directors’ Remuneration Report continued
Statement of voting at general meeting
At the AGM held on 29 November 2023, votes cast in respect of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and the Directors’ Remuneration 
Report were as follows:
Resolution
Votes for
% for
Votes against
% against
Total votes cast
Votes withheld
Approval of Remuneration Policy
61,006,328
95.50
2,875,973
4.50
63,882,301
15,204
Resolution
Votes for
% for
Votes against
% against
Total votes cast
Votes withheld
Approval of Remuneration Report
61,923,884
97.05
1,879,562
2.95
63,803,446
94,059
This report was approved by the Board and has been signed on its behalf by:
Catherine Glickman
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
11 September 2024
Annual Report on remuneration continued
94
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Dividends
The Directors propose a final dividend of £43,236,395 or 
59.4p per share, which, together with the interim dividend of 
£12,228,475 or 16.8p per share, gives a total dividend for the 
year of £55,464,870 or 76.2p per share. Last year the Board 
agreed a total dividend for the year of £55,464,870 or 76.2p 
per share.
As at 30 June 2024, 67,481 shares were held by the Renishaw 
plc Employee Benefit Trust (EBT). These shares may be used 
to satisfy awards made to employees under the Company’s 
employee share plan – namely, the Renishaw Deferred Annual 
Equity Incentive Plan (DAEIP). Under the terms of the EBT, 
any dividends payable on these shares are waived.
Directors and their interests
The Directors who served on the Board during the year are listed 
on pages 56 and 57. In accordance with the provisions of the 
Governance Code, all Directors will retire and, being eligible, 
offer themselves for re-election to office or, in the case of any 
Director who was first appointed to the Board since the last 
AGM, election to office at the AGM to be held on Wednesday, 
27 November 2024. Details of these Directors are shown on 
pages 56 and 57 and full biographical details are available at 
www.renishaw.com/directors.
The rules on appointment, reappointment and retirement by 
rotation of the Directors and their powers are set out in the 
Company’s Articles of Association. There are no powers given 
to the Directors that are regarded as unusual.
The Directors’ interests in our share capital (with the equivalent 
number of voting rights), as notified to the Company, are listed 
on page 92. There has been no change in the holdings shown 
on page 92 in the period 1 July 2024 to 11 September 2024.
All the interests were beneficially held, except for 2,278,161 
shares (2023: 2,278,161 shares) that were non-beneficially 
held by John Deer but in respect of which he has voting rights.
There is a voting agreement in place between Sir David 
McMurtry, as one party, and John Deer and Mrs M E Deer, 
as the other party. As announced on 12 July 2023, this voting 
agreement was renewed for a period of five years (unless it 
terminates earlier in accordance with its terms). Under this 
agreement the parties agree that: (i) John Deer and Mrs M E 
Deer will vote their shares in favour of any ordinary resolution 
if requested to do so by Sir David McMurtry; and (ii) Sir David 
McMurtry will vote his shares against any special or 
extraordinary resolution if requested to do so by John Deer.
Review of the business
A review of the business and likely future developments is 
given in the Chairman’s statement, the Chief Executive’s review 
and the other sections of the Strategic Report. Segmental 
information by geographical market is given in Note 2 to the 
Financial statements.
The principal activities of the Company are the design, 
manufacture, sale, distribution and service of manufacturing 
technologies products and services, and analytical instruments 
and medical devices, as outlined on pages 29 to 34 of the 
Strategic Report. The Group has overseas subsidiaries to 
manufacture, market and distribute some of the Group’s 
products and to support customers in the following major 
markets outside the UK:
	
— Americas: Brazil, Canada, Mexico and USA; 
	
— APAC: Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, 
Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan; and
	
— EMEA: Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, 
Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, 
Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and UAE.
There are also representative offices in Indonesia, Slovakia, 
Thailand and Vietnam.
In addition, in Slovenia the Group has a joint venture, RLS 
Merilna tehnika d.o.o. (RLS), and a subsidiary that designs 
and arranges the procurement of application-specific 
integrated circuits.
Further information is available on our website: 
www.renishaw.com.
Research and development
The Group continues to invest significantly in developing future 
technologies, with R&D activities located primarily in the UK. 
We develop technologies that lead to patented products and 
methods to help deliver our segmental strategies. Further 
information on R&D expenditure is contained in Note 4 to 
the Financial statements. The amount of R&D expenditure 
capitalised, the amount amortised and impairment charges 
in the year are given in Note 12.
Other statutory and 
regulatory disclosures
95
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Other statutory and regulatory disclosures continued
Substantial shareholdings
Apart from the shareholdings (and corresponding voting rights) 
of Sir David McMurtry and John Deer (36.23% and 16.59% 
respectively), the table below discloses the voting rights that 
have been notified to the Company under the requirements 
of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and 
Transparency Rules DTR 5. These represent 3% or more of 
the voting rights attached to issued shares in the Company, 
as at 30 June 2024. Please note that these holdings may 
have changed since being notified to the Company. However, 
notification of any change is not required until an applicable 
threshold is crossed.
Substantial shareholdings
% of issued 
share capital
Number
of shares
BlackRock, Inc.
4.92%
3,578,133
Capital Research and 
Management Company
4.76%
3,465,738
Standard Life Investments Limited
4.99%
3,631,612
There have been no changes notified to the Company, 
in the holdings shown above, in the period 1 July 2024 to 
11 September 2024.
Employees
The retention of our highly skilled people is essential to our future. 
The Directors place great emphasis on the continuation of our 
training programmes and competitive rewards. Health and safety 
matters are another key area of focus, and well-established 
systems of safety management are in place throughout the 
Group to safeguard employees, customers and others.
Employment policies are designed to provide equal 
opportunities irrespective of race, religion, gender, age, 
socio-economic background, disability or sexual orientation. 
The Company gives full and fair consideration to applications 
for employment from people with disabilities, where suitable, 
for appropriate vacancies. Employees who become disabled 
while with the Company will be given every opportunity to 
continue their employment through reasonable adjustments 
to their working conditions and equipment. Where this is not 
possible, the Company offers retraining for other positions. 
They will also be afforded opportunities to continue training 
and gain promotion on the same basis as any other employee.
Details on how the Directors have engaged with employees and 
had regard to their interests are set out in various sections of this 
Annual Report, including pages 43 and 61. Information provided 
to employees on the performance of the business, consultation 
with employees and performance incentives is set out in various 
sections of the Annual Report, including page 85.
There are no agreements with employees providing for 
compensation for any loss of employment that may occur 
because of a takeover bid. 
Directors’ and officers’ indemnity insurance 
and Directors’ indemnities
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the 
Company’s Articles of Association provide for the Directors 
and officers of the Company to be appropriately indemnified. 
In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association and 
to the extent permitted by law, Directors (excluding the founders) 
have been granted an indemnity in respect of loss and liability 
incurred as a result of their office. Neither the Company’s 
indemnity nor insurance provides cover in the event that 
a Director is proven to have acted dishonestly, fraudulently 
or negligently. Copies of all indemnities granted are available 
for inspection at the Company’s registered office.
The Company also maintains insurance for its Directors and 
officers in respect of their acts and omissions during the 
performance of their duties.
Responsibility statement
As required under the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) 
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, a statement 
made by the Board regarding the preparation of the Financial 
statements is set out on page 99.
Share capital and change of control
Details of the Company’s share capital, including rights and 
obligations, is given in Note 26 to the Financial statements. 
The Company is not a party to any significant agreements 
that might terminate upon a change of control.
A shareholder authority for the purchase by the Company of 
a maximum of 10% of its own shares was in existence during 
FY2024. However, the Company did not purchase any of its 
own shares during that time.
Auditor
A resolution to reappoint Ernst & Young LLP as the auditor 
of the Company will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.
Disclosure of information to auditor
The Directors who held office at the date of approval of this 
statement confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there is 
no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor 
is unaware. Each Director has taken all the steps that he or she 
ought to have taken as a Director to make himself/herself aware 
of any relevant audit information and to establish that our auditor 
is aware of that information.
Annual General Meeting
The notice convening the AGM is enclosed with an explanation 
of our proposed resolutions. At the meeting, the Company will 
be seeking shareholder approval for, among other things, the 
ability to make market purchases of its ordinary shares, up to 
a total of 10% of the issued share capital.
96
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

For the purposes of UKLR 6.6.1(13), the Board confirms that the 
Company continues to carry on the business that it carries out 
as its main activity independently from its controlling 
shareholders at all times. 
Greenhouse gas emissions and 
energy consumption
Disclosures concerning GHG emissions and energy 
consumption are set out on page 41.
Suppliers, customers and other stakeholders
Details on how the Directors have had regard to the need to 
promote the Group’s relationships with suppliers, customers 
and others is set out on pages 64 to 66. The effect of that 
consideration on the Directors’ principal decisions during 
FY2024 is also contained in the same section.
Political donations
No political donations were made during the year.
Events after the balance sheet date
There have been no material events affecting the Company 
since the year end.
Financial risk management, objectives 
and policies
Descriptions of the following can be found in Note 25 to the 
Consolidated financial statements on pages 144 to 149:
	
— the use of financial instruments;
	
— the Group’s financial risk management objectives 
and policies;
	
— policies in relation to hedge accounting; and 
	
— exposure to market risk, including credit and liquidity risk. 
Controlling shareholders
The UK Listing Rules (UKLR) contain certain requirements for 
listed companies with controlling shareholders. A controlling 
shareholder is a shareholder who individually or with any of their 
concert parties exercises or controls 30% or more of the votes 
that may be cast on all, or substantially all, the matters at 
a company’s general meeting. As such, Sir David McMurtry 
(Non-executive Director, 36.23% shareholder) is a controlling 
shareholder. John Deer (Non-executive Deputy Chairman, 
together with his wife, 16.59% shareholder) is also a controlling 
shareholder by virtue of a longstanding voting agreement 
between him (and his wife) and Sir David McMurtry.
One of the requirements for companies with controlling 
shareholders is that the election or re-election of independent 
directors at the Annual General Meeting is subject to a dual 
vote of: (i) the shareholders as a whole; and (ii) the independent 
shareholders, being any person entitled to vote on the election 
of directors who is not a controlling shareholder of the Company. 
Another requirement is that the listed company is able to 
carry on the business that it carries out as its main activity 
independently from its controlling shareholders at all times. 
Following recent changes to the UK Listing Rules, there is 
no longer a requirement that listed companies with controlling 
shareholders enter into a relationship agreement containing 
specific independence provisions (and the Company has stated 
previously, there is no relationship agreement in place with its 
controlling shareholders). There is no longer the associated 
enhanced oversight regime as a result of not entering into 
a relationship agreement and the related party transaction 
provisions contained in UKLR 8 apply. 
97
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance report
Disclosure of information under UKLR 6.6.1R
The information that fulfils the reporting requirements under this rule can be found on the pages identified in the table below.
Section
Topic
Location
(1)
Interest capitalised
Not applicable
(2)
Publication of unaudited financial information
Not applicable
(3)
Details of long-term incentive schemes
Not applicable
(4)
Waiver of emoluments by a director
Not applicable
(5)
Waiver of future emoluments by a director
Not applicable
(6)
Non-pre-emptive issues of equity for cash
Not applicable
(7)
As item (6), in relation to major subsidiary undertakings
Not applicable
(8)
Parent participation in a placing by a listed subsidiary
Not applicable
(9)
Contracts of significance
Not applicable
(10)
Provision of services by a controlling shareholder
Directors’ Remuneration Report, starting on page 82
(11)
Shareholder waivers of dividends
Other statutory and regulatory disclosures, starting on page 95
(12)
Shareholder waivers of future dividends
Other statutory and regulatory disclosures, starting on page 95
(13)
Statement in relation to controlling shareholders
Other statutory and regulatory disclosures, starting on page 95
Signed on behalf of the Board.
Kasim Hussain
Group General Counsel & Company Secretary
11 September 2024
Renishaw plc 
Registered number 01106260
England and Wales
98
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and 
integrity of the corporate and financial information included 
on the Company’s website. Legislation in the UK governing 
the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may 
differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. 
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also 
responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors’ Report, 
Directors’ Remuneration Report and corporate governance 
statement that comply with the relevant laws and regulations. 
Directors’ confirmations 
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions can be 
found on pages 56 and 57, confirms that, to the best of his 
or her knowledge: 
	
— the Financial statements, prepared in accordance with the 
applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair 
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or 
loss of the Group and of the Company and the undertakings 
included in the consolidation taken as a whole; and 
	
— the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report include a fair 
review of the development and performance of the business 
during the year and the position of the Group and of the 
Company at the year end, together with a description of the 
principal risks and uncertainties that they face. 
The Directors consider that the Annual Report, taken as a whole, 
is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the 
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s 
position and performance, business model and strategy. 
Signed on behalf of the Board. 
Allen Roberts 
Group Finance Director 
11 September 2024
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 
in respect of the Annual Report and 
Financial statements
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report 
and the Group and Company Financial statements in 
accordance with applicable law and regulations. 
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and 
Company Financial statements for each financial year. 
Under that law the Directors are required to prepare the 
Group financial statements in accordance with UK adopted 
international accounting standards, and have elected to 
prepare the parent Company financial statements in accordance 
with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 
(United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law) 
including Financial Reporting Standard 101, ‘Reduced 
Disclosure Framework’. 
Under company law the Directors must not approve the Financial 
statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair 
view of the state of affairs of the Group and the Company and of 
their profit or loss for that period.
In preparing each of the Group and Company Financial 
statements, the Directors are required to: 
	
— select suitable accounting policies and then apply them 
consistently;
	
— make judgements and accounting estimates that are 
reasonable and prudent; 
	
— state whether they have been prepared in accordance with 
applicable accounting standards; and
	
— prepare the Financial statements on the going concern basis 
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and the 
Company will continue in business. 
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the 
Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy 
at any time the financial position of the Group and the Company, 
and enable them to ensure that the Financial statements comply 
with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for 
safeguarding the assets of the Group and the Company and 
hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and 
detection of fraud and other irregularities. 
Directors’ responsibilities
99
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
GOVERNANCE REPORT


102 	 Independent Auditor’s Report
113	
Financial statements contents
114	
Consolidated income statement
115	
Consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income and expense
116	
Consolidated balance sheet
117	
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
118	
Consolidated statement of cash flow
119	
Notes (forming part of the financial statements)
155	
Company balance sheet
156	
Company statement of changes in equity
157	
Notes to the Company financial statements
Financial statements
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
101
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Financial statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of 
Renishaw plc
Opinion
In our opinion:
	
— Renishaw plc’s Group financial statements and Parent Company financial statements (the “financial statements”) give a true and 
fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 June 2024 and of the Group’s profit for the year 
then ended;
	
— the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards;
	
— the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice; and
	
— the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 
We have audited the financial statements of Renishaw plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the 
year ended 30 June 2024 which comprise:
 Group
Parent company
Consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2024
Balance sheet as at 30 June 2024
Consolidated income statement for the year then ended
Statement of changes in equity for the year then ended
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and 
expense for the year then ended
Related notes C.30 to C.48 to the financial statements, 
including material accounting policy information
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year 
then ended
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended
Related notes 1 to 29 to the financial statements, 
including material accounting policy information
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law 
and UK adopted international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation 
of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 
“Reduced Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
Basis for opinion 
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. 
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial 
statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide 
a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the Group and Parent in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the 
financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have 
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. 
The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and 
we remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting the audit. 
102
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group and Parent 
Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included the following procedures:
	
— We understood the process undertaken by management to perform the going concern assessment including the evaluation 
of the ongoing impact of current global macro-economic factors
	
— We obtained management’s going concern assessment, including the cash flow forecasts for the going concern period, which 
covers the period from approval of the 2024 financial statements through to 30 September 2025. We verified these forecasts 
were consistent with the Board approved forecasts ensuring the operating profit, working capital adjustments and resultant 
cashflows in the going concern assessment matched those in the forecasts. The Group has modelled a base scenario, based 
on the pessimistic version of the business plan; and three ‘severe but plausible’ downside scenarios linked to the principal risks 
identified by management reflecting: a significant reduction in revenue; a significant increase in costs; and a combined reduction 
in profitability. The Group has also modelled a reverse stress test based on liquidity in order to determine how much additional 
downside in trading could be absorbed before the Group exhausted its cash and cash equivalents and bank deposit balances.
	
— We assessed the appropriateness of the duration of the going concern assessment period being the period to 30 September 2025.
	
— We evaluated the key assumptions underpinning the Group’s base case forecast. In particular we compared the revenue growth 
projections to external industry forecasts and latest economic data to search for indicators of contradictory information. 
	
— We considered the results of management’s reverse stress test, assessing whether such a scenario was remote with reference 
to management’s forecasts, the Group’s historic trading and other information obtained throughout the audit, such as how the 
Group has responded to market challenges.
	
— We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s forecasting for the past 10 years, by comparing the Group’s actual 
results to Board approved budgets and re-forecasts to further challenge the prospective financial information included in the 
going concern assessment; 
	
— We tested the clerical accuracy of the model used to prepare the Group’s going concern assessment and the appropriateness 
of the model for this purpose; and
	
— We assessed the appropriateness of the Group’s disclosures regarding the going concern basis of preparation.
We observed that the Group held cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits of £217.8m and had borrowings of £3.5m 
at 30 June 2024 which are not subject to financial covenants. Revenue for FY2024 increased by 0.4% to £691.3m compared 
to FY2023 (2023: £688.6m) and the Group generated a statutory profit before tax of £122.6m for the year ended 30 June 2024 
(2023: £145.1m). Management’s reverse stress test indicated the Group would have to suffer a trading level so low, before it 
depleted its cash and cash equivalents and bank deposit balances, that the Directors consider that the events that could trigger 
this would be remote. The Directors also concluded that the risk of a one-off cash outflow, that would exhaust the Group’s cash 
and cash equivalents and bank deposit balances in the assessment period, was also remote. 
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, 
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern 
for the period to 30 September 2025. In relation to the Group and Parent Company’s reporting on how they have applied the UK 
Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the 
financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections 
of this report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Overview of our audit approach
Audit scope
	
— We performed an audit of the complete financial information of 5 components and audit procedures 
on specific balances for a further 8 components.
	
— The components where we performed full, specific or specified audit procedures accounted for 97% 
of adjusted profit before tax, 89% of Revenue and 91% of Total assets.
Key audit matters
Group
	
— Revenue recognition - the risk of management override through inappropriate manual journals to revenue 
	
— Valuation of the defined benefit pension liabilities
	
— Accounting treatment for pension buy-in transaction
Parent Company
	
— Carrying value of intercompany receivables 
Materiality
	
— Overall Group materiality of £6.1m which represents 5% of Adjusted profit before tax
103
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
An overview of the scope of the Parent Company and Group audits
Tailoring the scope
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope 
for each company within the Group. Taken together, this enables us to form an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. 
We take into account size, risk profile, the organisation of the Group and effectiveness of Group-wide controls, changes in the 
business environment, the potential impact of climate change and other factors such as recent Internal audit results when assessing 
the level of work to be performed at each company. 
In assessing the risk of material misstatement to the Group financial statements, and to ensure we had adequate quantitative 
coverage of significant accounts in the financial statements, of the 55 reporting components of the Group, we selected 15 components 
covering entities within United Kingdom, Ireland, Japan, Germany, Hong Kong, China, Italy, India, South Korea, France, Mexico and 
United States of America which represent the principal business units within the Group.
Of the 15 components selected, we performed an audit of the complete financial information of five components (“full scope 
components”) which were selected based on their size or risk characteristics. We performed audit procedures on eight components 
(“specific scope components”) that we considered had the potential for the greatest impact on the significant accounts in the 
financial statements either because of the size of these accounts or their risk profile. We also performed specified audit procedures 
on two components (“specified procedure components”) over revenue and trade receivable accounts. 
The reporting components where we performed audit procedures accounted for 97% (2023: 96%) of the Group’s Adjusted profit 
before tax, 89% (2023: 88%) of the Group’s Revenue and 91% (2023: 93%) of the Group’s Total assets. For the current year, the full 
scope components contributed 84% (2023: 94%) of the Group’s Adjusted profit before tax, 53% (2023: 79%) of the Group’s Revenue 
and 70% (2023: 85%) of the Group’s Total assets. The specific scope component contributed 12% (2023: 2%) of the Group’s 
Adjusted profit before tax, 33% (2023: 9%) of the Group’s Revenue and 19% (2023: 8%) of the Group’s Total assets. The audit scope 
of these components may not have included testing of all significant accounts of the component but will have contributed to the 
coverage of significant accounts tested for the Group. The specified procedures were performed over revenue and trade 
receivables which contributed 1% (2023: Nil) of the Group’s Adjusted profit before tax, 3% (2023: Nil) of the Group’s Revenue 
and 2% (2023: Nil) of the Group’s Total assets. 
Of the 40 components that together represent 3% of the Group’s Adjusted profit before tax, none are individually greater than 
0.9% of the Group’s Adjusted profit before tax. For these components, we performed other procedures including, analytical review, 
testing of consolidation journals and intercompany eliminations, foreign currency translation recalculations and cash confirmation 
procedures to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement to the Group financial statements.
The table below illustrates the coverage obtained from the work performed by our audit teams.
Components
Adjusted Profit before tax
Revenue
Total assets
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
Full scope
5
8 
84%
94% 
53%
79% 
70%
85% 
Specific scope
8
6
12%
2%
33%
9% 
19%
8% 
Full and specific scope 
procedures coverage
13
14
96%
96%
86%
88%
89%
93%
Specified procedures 
2
–
1%
–
3%
–
2%
–
Full, specific, and specified 
procedures coverage
15
14
97%
96%
89%
88%
91%
93%
Remaining components considered 
under ‘Other procedures’
40
40
3%
4%
11%
12%
9%
7%
Overall coverage 
55
54
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Changes from the prior year
The audit scope for some components has been changed during the year. Certain entities have moved scope as a result of their 
relative contribution to the Group’s key metrics and/or given our ability based on past experience to refine the procedures performed 
on accounts or at certain components. As a result, scoping of three components has been changed from full scope to specific 
scope. Similarly, one specific scope component has been moved to specified procedures and one component has moved from 
previously being part of the population of components covered by “other procedures” to being scoped as specified procedures.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Renishaw plc continued
104
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Involvement with component teams
In establishing our overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be undertaken at each of the 
components by us, as the primary audit engagement team, or by component auditors from other EY global network firms operating 
under our instruction. Of the five full scope components, audit procedures were performed on two of these directly by the primary 
audit team. Of the eight specific scope components, audit procedures were performed on five of these directly by the primary team. 
For the three full scope and three specific scope components, where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined 
the appropriate level of involvement to enable us to determine that sufficient audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our 
opinion on the Group as a whole.
The Group audit team continued to follow a programme of planned visits that has been designed to ensure that the Senior Statutory 
Auditor visits key locations on a rotational basis. During the current year’s audit cycle, visits were undertaken by a combination of 
the Senior Statutory Auditor and/or other senior members of the primary audit team to component teams in the following locations: 
China, Ireland, United States, Hong Kong, India and Germany. These visits involved discussing the audit approach with the component 
team and any issues arising from their work, meeting with local management, attending closing meetings and reviewing relevant 
audit working papers on risk areas. The primary team interacted regularly with the component teams as appropriate during various 
stages of the audit and were responsible for the scope and direction of the audit process. This, together with the additional 
procedures performed at Group level, gave us appropriate evidence for our opinion on the Group financial statements.
Climate change 
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change will impact Renishaw plc. The Group has determined that the most 
significant future impacts from climate change on their operations will be from extreme weather events, technological developments 
of additive manufacturing and from transition to electric vehicles and increasing carbon taxation. These are explained on pages 46 
to 51 in the required Task Force On Climate Related Financial Disclosures and on pages 11 to 18 in Risk management and principal 
risks and uncertainties. The Group has also explained its climate commitments on pages 36 to 41. All of these disclosures form part 
of the “Other information,” rather than the audited financial statements. Our procedures on these unaudited disclosures therefore 
consisted solely of considering whether they are materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in 
the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on “Other information”. 
In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of climate change on the Group’s business and any 
consequential material impact on its financial statements. 
The Group has explained in Note 1 of the financial statements how they have reflected the impact of climate change including how 
this aligns with their commitment to the aspirations of the Paris Agreement to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. The Group has 
concluded that climate change did not have a material effect on the accounting judgements and estimates, nor on the carrying value 
of assets and liabilities for the year ended 30 June 2024, but recognises that climate change may pose a greater risk to the Group 
over time. Our audit effort in considering the impact of climate change on the financial statements was focused on evaluating 
management’s assessment of the impact of climate risk, physical and transition, their climate commitments and the effects of 
material climate risks disclosed on pages 46 to 51. We also evaluated management’s assessment of the impact of climate change 
on the significant judgements and estimates disclosed in Note 1 on asset values, including goodwill, capitalised development costs 
and deferred tax assets, where these are impacted by future cash flows, and the effect on inventories and right-of-use assets, and 
the useful economic lives and residual values of property, plant and equipment following the requirements of the UK-adopted 
International Accounting Standards. As part of this evaluation, we performed our own risk assessment, supported by our climate 
change internal specialists, to determine the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements from climate change which 
needed to be considered in our audit. 
We also challenged the Directors’ considerations of climate change risks in their assessment of going concern and viability 
and associated disclosures. 
Based on our work we have not identified the impact of climate change on the financial statements to be a key audit matter or 
to impact a key audit matter.
105
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Key audit matters 
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to 
fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of 
resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit 
of the financial statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Risk
Revenue recognition – the risk of management override through inappropriate manual journals to revenue 
(2024: £691.3 million, 2023: £688.6 million)
Refer to the Accounting policies (page 122); and Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 122) 
As revenue is a key performance indicator for external communication and an input into management’s earnings considerations; there 
is an incentive for management to manipulate the revenue recognised through manual journals posted throughout the year, to improve 
financial performance.
We consider that the vast majority of the Group’s revenue transactions are non-complex by nature, with revenue recognised at a point 
in time with no significant judgement required to be exercised by management. 
The risk level is consistent with prior year.
Our response to the risk 
We obtained an understanding of the processes and assessed the design and implementation of key controls for each of the material 
revenue streams. 
To test the appropriateness of revenue recognition throughout the period, we performed the following audit procedures:
	
— We used data analytics on all in scope components to analyse 100% of the revenue transactions recorded in the year, testing 
the correlation between revenue, trade receivables and cash and performing tests of detail over non-correlated transactions.
	
— We verified that cash receipts that correlate to trade receivables are recorded accurately, and relate to revenue, through testing 
a sample of cash journal entries to cash received during the period and testing a sample of trade receivable balances at year end 
to debtor confirmations or cash received post year end or evidence of delivery of goods to the customer. 
	
— For all in scope components we obtained and reviewed breakdowns of all manual journals and for all material revenue journals and 
a sample of non-material revenue journals we agreed the journal entries to underlying documentation to verify the appropriateness 
of the revenue being recognised.
	
— We assessed for evidence of management bias by testing all material manual journals either side of the year end and agreeing 
journal entries to appropriate supporting evidence.
	
— For in scope components we performed analytical procedures to compare revenue recognised with our expectations, 
management’s forecasts and, where possible, external market data.
	
— We used data analytics to identify potential instances of management override, by performing searches for:
i.	 manual journals based on the transaction type
ii.	 journals recorded outside of normal working hours
iii.	 journals posted by inappropriate individuals 
	
These journals were then agreed to underlying supporting documentation and business rationale, selecting those journals based 
on risk and materiality considerations.
Revenue at these in scope components represents 89% of the total revenue balance. 
In addressing this key audit matter, audit procedures were performed by a combination of the Primary Team and each of the component 
audit teams under our supervision.
Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee 
Based on the procedures performed, revenue recognised in the period is appropriate. Our procedures performed did not identify 
any unsupported manual adjustments to revenue nor any unexplained anomalies from our revenue analytics.
Our procedures did not identify instances of inappropriate management override across the Group.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Renishaw plc continued
106
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Valuation of the defined benefit pension liability (2024: £142.3 million, 2023: £139.0 million)
Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 79); Accounting policy (page 140); and Note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 140)
There is an increased risk of material misstatement due to the size of the pension liability, the level of judgement involved in estimating 
the key assumptions to calculate the liability and the fact that relatively small movements in these assumptions can result in a material 
impact to the financial statements.
At the time of the pension buy-in transaction for the UK scheme, a drafting error was identified in the 2015 trust deed in relation 
to the defined contribution underpin which requires evaluation as to any impact on the current and prior year valuation of the defined 
benefit liabilities.
Our response to the risk 
We obtained an understanding of the processes and assessed the design and implementation of key controls for estimating the defined 
benefit pension liability.
To test the appropriateness of the defined benefit pension liability, our audit procedures included:
	
— Evaluating the competence and objectivity of management’s external actuarial specialists.
	
— Assessing the completeness and accuracy of the member data, used by the actuaries to estimate the scheme liabilities, by testing 
the clerical accuracy of the member data schedules, checking changes to the participants in the year and performing an analytical 
review of the year-on-year movements in the data. 
	
— Evaluated the legal advice obtained by management in relation to the drafting error in the trust deed related to the defined contribution 
underpin. We challenged management’s assessment regarding the potential impact, if any, of this matter in relation to the value of the 
pension liability recorded in the financial statements. This included obtaining legal confirmation directly from management’s specialist. 
	
— Involved EY actuarial specialists as part of our audit team to:
i.	 independently estimate an acceptable range for each of the significant assumptions used in estimating the UK and Irish scheme 
liabilities, which included the discount rate; rate of inflation; and mortality assumptions. We compared each of the significant 
assumptions used by management’s actuarial specialist to our independent acceptable range.
ii.	 perform a roll forward of the UK and Irish scheme liabilities from 30 June 2023 to 30 June 2024 and independently reconcile 
the output to the amounts calculated by management’s external actuarial specialist.
	
— Evaluating whether the disclosures in the Group financial statements are in accordance with those required by IAS 19.
In addressing this key audit matter, audit procedures were performed by the Primary Team.
Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee 
Our audit procedures did not identify evidence of material misstatement regarding the valuation of the defined benefit pension liability. 
We concluded that the disclosures provided in Note 23 to the Group financial statements are in accordance with those required by IAS 19.
107
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Accounting treatment for pension buy-in transaction
Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 76); Accounting policy (page 140); and Note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 141)
During the period, the Company completed a pension buy-in transaction for the UK scheme. Considering the potential complexity 
in accounting for pension buy in transactions, we identified this to be a new risk in the current year. 
There is a high level of judgement involved in evaluating if a buy-in transaction is considered in substance a buy-out which depends on 
facts and circumstances of the transaction and requires evaluation of whether accounting treatment as a settlement should be applied. 
i.e., whether the re-measurement gain/(loss) on the pension asset should be recognised in the Income Statement or in the Statement of 
Other Comprehensive Income.
Our response to the risk 
We performed the following audit procedures over these pension related matters in current year:
	
— We reviewed management’s accounting paper regarding the pension buy-in transaction. 
	
— Reviewed the underlying agreements for the pension buy-in and evaluated whether the Company retained a legal and/or constructive 
obligation to pay scheme members.
	
— Reviewed the asset portfolio and price lock-in mechanism of the assets that were purchased as part of the transaction.
	
— Assessed if there is additional buy-out risk i.e., settlement as a transaction that eliminates all further legal or constructive obligations 
for part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan and concluded that there is no such buy out risk.
	
— Assessed the completeness and accuracy of the member data used by the actuaries to estimate the scheme liabilities as at the date 
of pension buy-in through testing the clerical accuracy of the member data schedules and performing an analytical review of the 
movements in the data. 
	
— Involved EY actuarial specialists as part of our team to:
i.	 independently estimate an acceptable range for each of the significant assumptions used in estimating the scheme liabilities at 
the date of pension buy-in, which included the discount rate; rate of inflation; and mortality assumptions
ii.	 perform a roll forward of the UK scheme liabilities from 30 June 2023 to the date of pension buy-in transaction and independently 
reconcile the output to the amounts calculated by management’s external actuarial specialist 
	
— Evaluated whether the disclosures in the Group financial statements related to the pension buy-in transaction are in accordance with IAS 19.
These audit procedures were completed by the primary team.
Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee 
Based on the procedures performed, we concluded the accounting treatment in relation to pension buy-in transactions is appropriate 
and the impact has been correctly recognised in Statement of Other Comprehensive Income. 
The disclosures related to the buy-in transaction as provided in Note 23 to the Group financial statements are in accordance with those 
required by IAS 19.
Parent Company only: Carrying value of intercompany receivables
Refer to the Audit Committee Report (page 79) and Note C.30 and C.36 of the Company Financial Statements (pages 157 and 161 
respectively)
Given the inherent uncertainty in forecast cash flows and/or the carrying value of the net assets of a subsidiary held by the Parent, there 
is a risk that the valuation of receivables due from a subsidiary to the Parent is overstated.
Our response to the risk 
	
— We made enquiries with management to obtain an understanding of the judgements made in estimating the recoverability of 
intercompany receivable balances. 
	
— We reviewed management’s assessment explaining their rationale for the conclusion to impair certain intercompany receivables. 
	
— We obtained management’s calculations over the valuation of impairment and challenged the assumptions used along with ensuring 
the arithmetical accuracy. 
	
— Where possible, we obtained appropriate third-party supporting evidence used by management to arrive at the key judgements 
assessed in management’s paper.
	
— We reviewed the disclosures made by management in the Company’s financial statements and ensured these are in line with the 
applicable accounting standards.
These audit procedures were completed by the primary team.
Key observations communicated to the Audit Committee 
Based on the procedures performed, we concluded the carrying value of the intercompany receivables is not materially misstated.
We consider the disclosure in relation to this matter to be in line with the requirements of IFRS 9.
In the current year, the pension buy-in transaction which occurred within the period has been considered a new key audit matter 
for the Group as a whole. For the Parent Company, given changes in the underlying forecasts and/or carrying values for certain 
subsidiaries, a new key audit matter related to the carrying value of intercompany receivables has been identified. These matters 
have been considered key audit matters considering the inherent risk and level of estimation and judgement involved in auditing 
these items, resulting in a higher level of audit effort being expended.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Renishaw plc continued
108
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Our application of materiality 
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the 
audit and in forming our audit opinion.
Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the 
economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our 
audit procedures.
We determined materiality for the Group to be £6.1 million (2023: £7.1 million), which is 5% (2023: 5%) of Adjusted profit before tax. 
We believe that Adjusted profit before tax is the metric which is used most prevalently by Group management in their internal and 
external reporting and the most relevant performance measure to the stakeholders of the Group. In the current year, there is no 
difference between adjusted profit before tax and profit before tax so no adjustments needed to be considered. 
We determined materiality for the Parent Company to be £8.1 million (2023: £8.9 million), which is 1% (2023: 1%) of Equity. 
During the course of our audit, we updated our planning materiality to reflect actual results being different to the forecast used 
to calculate planning materiality and performed our testing at this revised level.
Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level 
the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group’s overall control environment, our judgement 
was that performance materiality was 75% (2023: 75%) of our planning materiality, namely £4.6m (2023: £5.3m). We have set 
performance materiality at this percentage due to our expectation of misstatements being low.
Audit work at component locations for the purpose of obtaining audit coverage over significant financial statement accounts is 
undertaken based on a percentage of total performance materiality. The performance materiality set for each component is based on 
the relative scale and risk of the component to the Group as a whole and our assessment of the risk of misstatement at that component. 
In the current year, the range of performance materiality allocated to components was £0.3m to £3.1m (2023: £0.4m to £3.7m).
Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of £0.3m (2023: £0.4m), 
which is set at 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on 
qualitative grounds.
We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light 
of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.
109
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Other information 
The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report including the Strategic Report set out on pages 
2 to 52, the Governance Report set out on Pages 54 to 100 and Shareholders’ information set out on pages 169 to 170 other than 
the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information contained within 
the Annual Report. 
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated 
in this report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. 
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent 
with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. 
If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives 
rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude 
that there is a material misstatement of the other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
	
— the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial statements 
are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and 
	
— the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the 
course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic Report or the Directors’ Report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report 
to you if, in our opinion:
	
— adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been 
received from branches not visited by us; or
	
— the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement 
with the accounting records and returns; or
	
— certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
	
— we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate 
Governance Statement relating to the Group and Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 
specified for our review by the UK Listing Rules.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate 
Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:
	
— Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material 
uncertainties identified set out on page 69;
	
— Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period 
is appropriate set out on page 69;
	
— Directors’ statement on whether it has a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meets 
its liabilities set out on page 69;
	
— Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 100;
	
— Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on pages 14 to 18;
	
— The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems 
set out on page 80; and;
	
— The section describing the work of the Audit Committee set out on page 76 to 81.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Renishaw plc continued
110
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 100, the Directors are responsible for the preparation 
of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine 
is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as 
a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the 
Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is 
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, 
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. 
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud 
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud 
is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery 
or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, 
including fraud is detailed below.
However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the 
Company and management. 
	
— We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Group and determined that the 
most significant are those that relate to the reporting framework (UK adopted international accounting standards, United Kingdom 
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice ,the Companies Act 2006, the UK Corporate Governance Code) and the relevant tax 
compliance regulations in the UK and overseas jurisdictions in which the Group operates. In addition, we concluded that there 
are certain significant laws and regulations which may have an effect on the determination of the amounts and disclosures in 
the financial statements being the Listing Rules of the London Stock Exchange, the Bribery Act 2010, Occupational Health and 
Safety Regulations, General Data Protection Regulation and export controls as well as, for the Group’s overseas components, 
the non-UK equivalent of these legislative frameworks. 
	
— We understood how Renishaw plc is complying with those frameworks by reading internal policies and codes of conduct and 
assessing the entity level control environment, including the level of oversight of those charged with governance. We made 
enquiries of management, internal audit, the Group’s legal counsel and those responsible for legal and compliance procedures. 
We corroborated our enquiries through our review of Board minutes and papers provided to the Audit Committee and noted that 
there was no contradictory evidence. 
	
— We assessed the susceptibility of the Group’s financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur by 
considering the programs and controls that the Group has established to address risks identified by the entity, or that otherwise 
prevent, deter and detect fraud; how senior management monitor those programs and controls, evaluating conditions in the 
context of incentive and/or pressure to commit fraud, considering the opportunity to commit fraud and the potential rationalisation 
of the fraudulent act, and by making enquiries of senior management, including the Group Finance Director, Head of Group 
Finance, Group Internal Audit Manager and Chair of the Audit Committee. We planned our audit to identify risks of management 
override, tested higher risk journal entries and performed audit procedures to address the potential for management bias, 
particularly over areas involving significant estimation. Further discussion of our approach to address the identified risk of 
management override, related to revenue recognition, is set out in the key audit matters section of our report.
	
— Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. 
Our procedures involved: making enquires of management, including the Group’s internal and external legal counsel, internal 
audit and component management, of known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and 
regulations; attendance at Audit Committee meetings; review of Committee and Board meeting minutes, including Board 
meeting minutes for full scope components to identify any non-compliance with laws and regulations; journal entry testing, with 
a focus on journals meeting our defined risk criteria based on our understanding of the business; and review of the volume and 
nature of complaints received by the whistleblowing hotline during the year. Our procedures also included reading investigation 
reports from management and management’s legal specialist and involving our internal forensics and legal specialists to support 
our assessment of the conclusions reached in the reports. We also completed procedures to conclude on the compliance 
of significant disclosures in the Annual Report and Accounts with the requirements of the relevant accounting standards, 
UK legislation and the UK Corporate Governance Code. We communicated regularly with the full scope and specific scope 
component teams and attended key meetings with the component audit teams and local management in order to identify 
and communicate any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s 
website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
111
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Other matters we are required to address 
	
— Following the recommendation from the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the Parent Company on 13 October 2016 
to audit the financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2017 and subsequent financial periods. 
	
— The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments is eight years, covering the 
years ending 30 June 2017 to 30 June 2024.
	
— The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to 
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, 
or for the opinions we have formed.
Helen McLeod-Jones (Senior statutory auditor)
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor
Bristol
11 September 2024
Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Renishaw plc continued
112
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Introduction
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and Company financial statements in accordance with 
applicable law and regulations. The full statement of Directors’ responsibilities can be found on page 99.
The notes (forming part of the financial statements) provide additional information required by statute, accounting standards or other 
regulations to assist in a more detailed understanding of the primary financial statements.
Financial statements contents
Consolidated financial statements 
Primary statements
114 Consolidated income statement
115 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense
116 Consolidated balance sheet
117
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
118 Consolidated statement of cash flow
Notes (forming part of the financial statements)
119 1. Accounting policies
122 2. Revenue disaggregation and segmental analysis
124 3. Employee costs
125 4. Cost of sales
125 5. Financial income and expenses
126 6. Profit before tax
126 7. Taxation
129 8. Earnings per share
129 9. Property, plant and equipment
130 10. Right-of-use assets
131 11. Investment properties
132 12. Intangible assets
135 13. Investments in joint ventures
136 14. Leases (as lessor)
136 15. Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits
137 16. Inventories
137 17. Provisions
138 18. Contract liabilities
138 19. Other payables
138 20. Borrowings
139 21. Leases (as lessee)
140 22. Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
140 23. Employee benefits
143 24. Share-based payments
144 25. Financial instruments
150 26. Share capital and reserves
151 27. Capital commitments
152 28. Related parties
152 29. Alternative performance measures
	
Company financial statements
Primary statements
155 Company balance sheet
156 Company statement of changes in equity
Notes to the Company financial statements
157 C.30. Accounting policies
159 C.31. Property, plant and equipment
160 C.32. Right-of-use assets
160 C.33. Intangible assets
160 C.34. Investments in subsidiaries
160 C.35. Investments in joint ventures
161 C.36. Long-term loans to Group undertakings
161 C.37. Deferred tax
161 C.38. Inventories
161 C.39. Trade receivables
162 C.40. Provisions
162 C.41. Leases (as lessee)
162 C.42. Other payables
162 C.43. Employee benefits
164 C.44. Share capital
164 C.45. Related parties
164 C.46. Capital commitments
164 C.47. Subsidiary undertakings
166 C.48. Joint ventures
113
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
from continuing operations
notes
2024 
£’000
2023 
£’000
Revenue 
2 
691,301
688,573
Cost of sales 
4 
(367,658)
(337,908) 
Gross profit 
323,643
350,665 
Distribution costs 
(139,901)
(137,744) 
Administrative expenses 
(75,075)
(74,894) 
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost 
23 
–
(2,139) 
Losses from the fair value of financial instruments 
25 
–
(1,399) 
Operating profit 
108,667
134,489 
Financial income 
5 
12,336
9,669
Financial expenses 
5 
(2,289)
(1,861)
Share of profits of joint ventures
13 
3,880
2,768 
Profit before tax 
122,594
145,065 
Income tax expense
7 
(25,705)
(28,963) 
Profit for the year 
96,889
116,102 
Profit attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the parent company
96,889
116,102
Non-controlling interest 
26 
–
– 
Profit for the year 
96,889
116,102 
 
pence
pence
Dividend per share arising in respect of the year 
26 
76.2
76.2 
Dividend per share paid in the year 
26 
76.2
73.4 
Earnings per share (basic and diluted) 
8 
133.2
159.7 
Adjusted profit before tax for the year was £122,594,000 (2023: £140,983,000). See Note 29 Alternative performance measures for 
more details.
Consolidated income statement
for the year ended 30 June 2024
114
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

notes
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Profit for the year
96,889
116,102
Other items recognised directly in equity:
Items that will not be reclassified to the Consolidated income statement:
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme assets/liabilities
23
(48,688)
13,612
Deferred tax on remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme assets/liabilities
12,424
(3,071)
Total for items that will not be reclassified
(36,264)
10,541
Items that may be reclassified to the Consolidated income statement:
Exchange differences in translation of overseas operations
26
(4,038)
(8,000)
Exchange differences in translation of overseas joint venture
26
(311)
–
Current tax on translation of net investments in overseas operations
26
57
313
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of recycling
26
5,812
23,167
Deferred tax on effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
7, 26
(1,453)
(5,692)
Total for items that may be reclassified
67
9,788
Total other comprehensive income and expense, net of tax
(36,197)
20,329
Total comprehensive income and expense for the year
60,692
136,431
Attributable to:
Equity shareholders of the parent company
60,692
136,431
Non-controlling interest
26
–
–
Total comprehensive income and expense for the year
60,692
136,431
Consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income and expense
for the year ended 30 June 2024
115
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
notes
2024
£’000
2023*
£’000
Assets
Property, plant and equipment
9
325,040
286,085
Right-of-use assets
10
14,746
8,402
Investment properties
11
10,285
10,323
Intangible assets
12
47,343
46,468
Investments in joint ventures
13
25,485
22,414
Finance lease receivables
14
11,944
9,935
Employee benefits
23
10,845
57,416
Deferred tax assets
7
17,690
19,944
Derivatives
25
1,387
9,443
Total non-current assets
464,765
470,430
Current assets
Inventories
16
161,928
185,757
Trade receivables
25
134,073
123,427
Finance lease receivables
14
3,861
3,764
Current tax
21,298
19,558
Other receivables
25
34,076
28,840
Derivatives
25
13,547
5,373
Bank deposits
15
95,542
125,000
Cash and cash equivalents
15, 25
122,293
81,388
Total current assets
586,618
573,107
Current liabilities
Trade payables
25
21,330
21,551
Contract liabilities
18
10,880
9,971
Current tax
1,767
7,118
Provisions
17
2,997
2,758
Derivatives
25
448
5,089
Lease liabilities
21
3,960
3,009
Amounts payable to joint venture
13
8,475
–
Borrowings
20
747
4,694
Other payables
19
50,344
48,130
Total current liabilities
100,948
102,320
Net current assets
485,670
470,787
Non-current liabilities
Lease liabilities
21
11,062
5,624
Borrowings
20
2,775
–
Employee benefits
23
–
45
Deferred tax liabilities
7
33,600
38,770
Derivatives
25
177
120
Total non-current liabilities
47,614
44,559
Total assets less total liabilities
902,821
896,658
Equity
Share capital
26
14,558
14,558
Share premium
42
42
Own shares held
26
(2,963)
(2,963)
Currency translation reserve
26
2,480
6,772
Cash flow hedging reserve
26
10,911
6,552
Retained earnings
876,990
871,777
Other reserve
26
1,380
497
Equity attributable to the shareholders of the parent company
903,398
897,235
Non-controlling interest
26
(577)
(577)
Total equity
902,821
896,658
*2023 Other receivables have been reclassified to include Contract assets. See Note 25. 
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 11 September 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:
Sir David Grant	
	
	
Allen Roberts
Interim Non-executive Chair		
Group Finance Director
Consolidated balance sheet
for the year ended 30 June 2024
116
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Year ended 30 June 2023
Share
capital
£’000
Share
premium
£’000
Own
shares
held
£’000
Currency
translation
reserve 
£’000
Cash flow
hedging
reserve
£’000
Retained
earnings
£’000
Other
reserve
£’000
Non-
controlling
interest
£’000
Total
£’000
Balance at 1 July 2022
14,558
42
(750)
14,459
(10,923) 798,541
(180)
(577)
815,170
Profit for the year
−
−
−
−
−
116,102
−
−
116,102
Other comprehensive income and expense 
(net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension 
scheme assets/liabilities
−
−
−
−
−
10,541
−
−
10,541
Foreign exchange translation differences
−
−
−
(7,687)
−
−
−
−
(7,687)
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
−
−
−
−
17,475
−
−
−
17,475
Total other comprehensive income
and expense
−
−
−
(7,687)
17,475
10,541
−
−
20,329
Total comprehensive income
and expense
−
−
−
(7,687)
17,475
126,643
−
−
136,431
Share-based payments charge
−
−
−
−
−
−
677
−
677
Own shares purchased
−
−
(2,213)
−
−
−
−
−
(2,213)
Dividends paid
−
−
−
−
−
(53,407)
−
−
(53,407)
Balance at 30 June 2023
14,558
42
(2,963)
6,772
6,552
871,777
497
(577) 896,658
Year ended 30 June 2024
Profit for the year
–
–
–
–
–
96,889
–
–
96,889
Other comprehensive income and expense 
(net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension 
scheme assets/liabilities
–
–
–
–
–
(36,264)
–
–
(36,264)
Foreign exchange translation differences
–
–
–
(3,981)
–
–
–
–
(3,981)
Foreign exchange related to joint venture
–
–
–
(311)
–
–
–
–
(311)
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
–
–
–
–
4,359
–
–
–
4,359
Total other comprehensive income
and expense
–
–
–
(4,292)
4,359
(36,264)
–
–
(36,197)
Total comprehensive income
and expense
–
–
–
(4,292)
4,359
60,625
–
–
60,692
Share-based payments charge
–
–
–
–
–
–
883
–
883
Dividends paid
–
–
–
–
–
(55,412)
–
–
(55,412)
Balance at 30 June 2024
14,558
42
(2,963)
2,480
10,911 876,990
1,380
(577) 902,821
More details of share capital and reserves are given in Note 26.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 30 June 2024
117
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
notes
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit for the year
96,889
116,102
Adjustments for:
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets, and investment properties 9,10,11
24,195
24,105
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
9
(1,199)
155
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets
12
8,633
7,773
Loss on disposal of intangible assets
–
550
Share of profits from joint ventures
13
(3,880)
(2,768)
Defined benefit pension schemes past service and administrative costs
23
907
2,437
Financial income
5
(12,336)
(9,669)
Financial expenses
5
2,289
1,861
Gains from the fair value of financial instruments
25
–
(5,504)
Share-based payment expense
24
883
677
Tax expense
7
25,705
28,963
45,197
48,580
Decrease/(increase) in inventories
23,829
(23,275)
Increase in trade, finance lease and other receivables
(23,719)
(12,379)
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
3,557
(15,013)
Increase/(decrease) in provisions
239
(1,486)
3,906
(52,153)
Defined benefit pension scheme contributions
23
(161)
(2,341)
Income taxes paid
(21,752)
(25,891)
Cash flows from operating activities
124,079
84,297
Investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, and investment properties
9,11
(65,518)
(74,024)
Sale of property, plant and equipment
4,475
7,948
Development costs capitalised
12
(9,281)
(10,448)
Purchase of other intangibles
12
(246)
(379)
Decrease/(increase) in bank deposits
15
29,458
(25,000)
Interest received
5
9,110
6,302
Dividends received from joint ventures
13
498
924
Cash flows from investing activities
(31,504)
(94,677)
Financing activities
Repayment of borrowings
20
(799)
(914)
Amounts received as deposit from joint venture
13
8,475
–
Interest paid
5
(608)
(656)
Repayment of principal of lease liabilities
22
(4,359)
(4,206)
Own shares purchased
26
–
(2,213)
Dividends paid
26
(55,412)
(53,407)
Cash flows from financing activities
(52,703)
(61,396)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
39,872
(71,776)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
81,388
153,162
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held
1,033
2
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
15
122,293
81,388
Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits at the end of the year were £217.8m (2023: £206.4m). See Note 15 for more details.
Consolidated statement of cash flow
for the year ended 30 June 2024
118
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

1. Accounting policies
This section sets out our principal accounting policies that relate to the financial statements as a whole, along with the 
critical accounting judgements and estimates that management has identified as having a potentially material impact on 
the Group’s consolidated financial statements. Where an accounting policy is applicable to a specific note in the financial 
statements, the policy is described within that note.
Basis of preparation
Renishaw plc (the Company) is a company incorporated in England and Wales. The Group financial statements consolidate those 
of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the Group, and ‘we’) and equity account the Group’s interest in joint 
ventures. The parent company financial statements present information about the Company as a separate entity and not about 
the Group. 
The Group financial statements have been prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with UK-adopted International 
Accounting Standards (IAS). The parent company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting 
Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’. 
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Sterling, which is the Company’s functional currency and the Group’s 
presentational currency, and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand (£’000).
The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied consistently to all periods presented in these 
Group financial statements. Judgements made by the Directors, in the application of these accounting policies, that have a significant 
effect on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year are noted on page 121.
Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns 
from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. In assessing control, 
the Group takes into consideration potential voting rights that are exercisable. The acquisition date is the date on which control is 
transferred to the acquirer. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the 
date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Losses applicable to the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary 
are allocated to the non-controlling interests even if doing so causes the non-controlling interests to have a deficit balance.
Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method (equity-accounted investees) and are initially recognised at cost. 
The Group’s investments includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses.
The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the total comprehensive income and equity movements of equity 
accounted investees, from the date that significant influence commences until the date that significant influence ceases. When the 
Group’s share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity accounted investee, the Group’s carrying amount is reduced to nil and 
recognition of further losses is discontinued (except to the extent that the Group has incurred legal obligations or made payments 
on behalf of an investee).
Intragroup balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intragroup transactions, are eliminated 
on consolidation. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with equity accounted investees are eliminated against the investment 
to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only 
to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
Foreign currencies
On consolidation, overseas subsidiaries’ results are translated into Sterling at weighted average exchange rates for the year 
by translating each overseas subsidiary’s monthly results at exchange rates applicable to the respective months. Assets and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into Sterling at the foreign exchange rates 
prevailing at that date. Differences on exchange resulting from the translation of overseas assets and liabilities are recognised 
in Other comprehensive income and are accumulated in equity.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are reported at the rates prevailing at the time, with any gain or 
loss arising from subsequent exchange rate movements being included as an exchange gain or loss in the Consolidated income 
statement. Foreign currency differences arising from transactions are recognised in the Consolidated income statement.
Notes (forming part of the consolidated financial statements)
119
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Notes continued
1. Accounting policies continued
New, revised or changes to existing accounting standards
The following accounting standards and amendments became effective as at 1 January 2023 and have been adopted in the 
preparation of these financial statements, with effect from 1 July 2023:
	
— IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts;
	
— amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2, Disclosure of Accounting Policies;
	
— amendments to IAS 1, Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current;
	
— amendments to IAS 8, Definition of Accounting Estimates;
	
— amendments to IAS 12, Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction; and
	
— amendments to IAS 12, International Tax Reform Pillar Two Model Rules.
These have not had a material effect on these financial statements. 
At the date of these financial statements, the following standards and amendments that are potentially relevant to the Group, 
and which have not been applied in these financial statements, were in issue but not yet effective:
	
— IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosures in Financial Statements (not yet endorsed by the UK); 
	
— amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7, Supplier Finance Arrangements; and
	
— amendments to IFRS 16, Lease Liability in a Sale and Leaseback.
The adoption of these standards and interpretations in future periods is not expected to have a material impact on the financial 
statements of the Group.
The Finance (No 2) Bill 2023, that includes Pillar Two legislation, was substantively enacted on 20 June 2023 for IFRS purposes. 
The Group has performed an analysis of the potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes, which is presented in Note 7 Taxation.
As permitted by the amendments to IAS 12 International Tax Reform Pillar Two Model Rules, the Group has applied the exemption 
from recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes.
Alternative performance measures
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with adopted IFRS and applied in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006. In measuring our performance, the financial measures that we use include those which have been derived 
from our reported results, to eliminate factors which distort year-on-year comparisons. 
These are considered non-GAAP financial measures. We believe this information, along with comparable GAAP measurements, 
is useful to stakeholders in providing a basis for measuring our operational performance. The Board uses these financial measures, 
along with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, in evaluating our performance (see Note 29).
Separately disclosed items
The Directors consider that certain items should be separately disclosed to aid understanding of the Group’s performance.
Gains and losses from the fair value of financial instruments are therefore separately disclosed in the Consolidated income 
statement, where these gains and losses relate to certain forward currency contracts that are not effective for hedge accounting. 
Restructuring costs are also separately disclosed where significant costs have been incurred in rationalising and reorganising our 
business as part of a Board-approved initiative, and relate to matters that do not frequently recur.
In the previous period, a change to the US defined benefit pension scheme rules resulted in a significant non-recurring amount 
being recognised in the Consolidated income statement. This was also separately disclosed.
These items are also excluded from Adjusted profit before tax, Adjusted operating profit and Adjusted earnings per share measures, 
as explained in Note 29 Alternative performance measures.
120
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

1. Accounting policies continued
Critical accounting judgements and estimation uncertainties
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with UK-adopted IAS requires management to make judgements, estimates 
and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. 
The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable 
under the circumstances. The results of this form the basis of making judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that 
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may therefore differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying 
assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.
The areas of critical accounting judgements and estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment 
to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the next financial year are summarised below, with further details included within 
accounting policies as indicated.
Item
Key judgements (J) and estimates (E)
Page
Research and development costs
J – Whether a project meets the criteria for capitalisation
132
Goodwill and capitalised development costs
E – Estimates of future cash flows for impairment testing
132
Inventories
E – Determination of net realisable value
137
Defined benefit pension schemes
E – Valuation of defined benefit pension schemes’ liabilities
140
Defined benefit pension schemes
J – Whether past service costs need to be recognised
140
Cash flow hedges
E – Estimates of highly probable forecasts of the hedged item
144
Climate change
We have considered the potential effect of physical and transitional climate change risks when preparing these consolidated 
financial statements and have also considered the effect of our own Net Zero commitments. Our consideration of the potential effect 
of climate change on these consolidated financial statements included reviewing:
	
— discounted cash flow forecasts, used in accounting for goodwill, capitalised development costs, and deferred tax assets;
	
— useful economic lives and residual values of property, plant and equipment; 
	
— planned use of right-of-use assets; and
	
— expected demand for inventories.
We also considered the estimated capital expenditure needed in the next five years to deliver our Net Zero plan. 
Overall, we do not believe that climate change has a material effect on our accounting judgements and estimates, nor in the carrying 
value of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2024. We will continue to review the 
effect of climate change on financial statements in the future, and update our accounting and disclosures as the position changes.
Going concern
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis. The decision to adopt the going 
concern basis was made after considering:
	
— the Group’s strategy and business model, as set out on pages 7 to 10;
	
— the Group’s risk management processes and principal risks, disclosed on pages 11 to 18;
	
— the Group’s financial resources and strategies (pages 26 to 28); and
	
— the process undertaken to review the Group’s viability, including scenario testing, as set out on page 19.
The financial models for the viability review were based on the pessimistic version of the five-year business plan, but covering 
a period to 30 September 2027. For context, revenue in the first year of this pessimistic base scenario is similar to FY2024 revenue 
of £691.3m, while costs and other cash outflows still reflect ambitious growth plans. In the going concern assessment, the Directors 
reviewed this same version of the plan but to 30 September 2025, as well as the ‘severe but plausible’ scenarios used in the viability 
review, again to 30 September 2025. These scenarios reflected a significant reduction in revenue, a significant increase in costs, 
and a third scenario incorporating both a reduction to revenue and an increase in costs but to a lesser degree than the first two 
scenarios. In each scenario the Group’s cash balances remained positive throughout the period to 30 September 2025.
The Directors also reviewed a reverse stress test for the period to 30 September 2025, identifying what would need to happen 
in this period for the Group to deplete its cash and cash equivalents and bank deposit balances. This identified a trading level 
so low that the Directors feel that the events that could trigger this would be remote. The Directors also concluded that the risk of 
a one-off cash outflow that would exhaust the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits balances in the assessment 
period was also remote.
Based on this assessment, incorporating a review of the current position, the scenarios, the principal risks and mitigation, the 
Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue operating and meet its liabilities as they fall due 
over the period to 30 September 2025.
121
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Notes continued
2. Revenue disaggregation and segmental analysis
We manage our business by segment, comprising Manufacturing technologies and Analytical instruments and medical 
devices, and by geographical region. The results of these segments and regions are regularly reviewed by the Board to 
assess performance and allocate resources, and are presented in this note.
Accounting policy
The Group generates revenue from the sale of goods, capital equipment and services. These can be sold both on their own 
and together. 
a) Sale of goods, capital equipment and services
The Group’s contracts with customers consist both of contracts with one performance obligation and contracts with multiple 
performance obligations.
For contracts with one performance obligation, revenue is measured at the transaction price, which is typically the contract value 
except for customers entitled to volume rebates, and recognised at the point in time when control of the product transfers to the 
customer. This point in time is typically when the products are made available for collection by the customer, collected by the 
shipping agent, or delivered to the customer, depending upon the shipping terms applied to the specific contract.
Contracts with multiple performance obligations typically exist where, in addition to supplying products, we also supply services 
such as user training, servicing and maintenance, and installation. Where the installation service is simple, does not include 
a significant integration service and could be performed by another party then the installation is accounted for as a separate 
performance obligation. Where the contracts include multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each 
performance obligation based on the relative stand-alone selling prices. The revenue allocated to each performance obligation is 
then recognised when, or as, that performance obligation is satisfied. For installation, this is typically at the point in time in which 
installation is complete. For training, this is typically the point in time at which training is delivered. For servicing and maintenance, 
the revenue is recognised evenly over the course of the servicing agreement except for ad-hoc servicing and maintenance which 
is recognised at the point in time in which the work is undertaken.
b) Sale of software
The Group provides software licences and software maintenance to customers, sold both on their own and together with 
associated products. For software licences, where the licence and/or maintenance is provided as part of a contract that provides 
customers with software licences and other goods and services then the transaction price is allocated on the same basis as 
described in a) above.
The Group’s distinct software licences provide a right of use, and therefore revenue from software licences is recognised at the 
point in time in which the licence is supplied to the customer. Revenue from software maintenance is recognised evenly over the 
term of the maintenance agreement.
c) Extended warranties
The Group provides standard warranties to customers that address potential latent defects that existed at point of sale and 
as required by law (assurance-type warranties). In some contracts, the Group also provides warranties that extend beyond the 
standard warranty period and may be sold to the customer (service-type warranties). 
Assurance-type warranties are accounted for by the Group under IAS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent 
Assets’. Service-type warranties are accounted for as separate performance obligations and therefore a portion of the transaction 
price is allocated to this element, and then recognised evenly over the period in which the service is provided.
d) Contract balances
Contract assets represent the Group’s right to consideration in exchange for goods, capital equipment and/or services that have 
been transferred to a customer, and mainly includes accrued revenue in respect of goods and services provided to a customer 
but not yet fully billed. Contract assets are distinct from receivables, which represent the Group’s right to consideration that 
is unconditional.
Contract liabilities represent the Group’s obligation to transfer goods, capital equipment and/or services to a customer for which 
the Group has either received consideration or consideration is due from the customer.
e) Disaggregation of revenue
The Group disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers between: goods, capital equipment and installation, and 
aftermarket services; reporting segment; and geographical location.
Management believe these categories best depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of the Group’s revenue is 
affected by economic factors.
122
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

2. Revenue disaggregation and segmental analysis continued
Within the Manufacturing technologies business there are multiple product offerings with similar economic characteristics, similar 
production processes and similar customer bases. Our Manufacturing technologies business consists of industrial metrology, 
position measurement and additive manufacturing (AM) product groups. Analytical instruments and medical devices represents all 
other operating segments within the Group, which, business consists of spectroscopy and neurological product lines. More details 
of the Group’s products and services are given in the Strategic Report. 
Year ended 30 June 2024
Manufacturing
technologies
£’000
Analytical instruments
and medical devices
£’000
Total
£’000
Revenue
648,063
43,238
691,301
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
31,374
1,454
32,828
Operating profit
103,181
5,486
108,667
Share of profits of joint ventures
3,880
–
3,880
Net financial income/(expense)
–
–
10,047
Profit before tax
–
–
122,594
Year ended 30 June 2023
Manufacturing
technologies
£’000
Analytical instruments 
and medical devices
£’000
Total
£’000
Revenue
648,240
40,333
688,573
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
28,431
3,447
31,878
Operating profit, before losses from fair value of financial instruments and 
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost
132,843
5,184
138,027
Share of profits of joint ventures
2,768
–
2,768
Net financial income/(expense)
–
–
7,808
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost
–
–
(2,139)
Losses from the fair value of financial instruments
–
–
(1,399)
Profit before tax
–
–
145,065
There is no allocation of assets and liabilities to the segments identified above. Depreciation, amortisation and impairments are 
allocated to segments on the basis of the level of activity.
The following table shows the analysis of non-current assets, excluding deferred tax, derivatives and employee benefits, 
by geographical region:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
UK
 268,027 
 231,619 
Overseas
 166,816 
 152,008 
Total non-current assets
 434,843 
 383,627 
No overseas country had non-current assets amounting to 10% or more of the Group’s total non-current assets.
The following table shows the disaggregation of Group revenue by category:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Goods, capital equipment and installation
624,491
 624,992 
Aftermarket services
66,810
 63,581 
Total Group revenue
691,301
 688,573 
Aftermarket services include repairs, maintenance and servicing, programming, training, extended warranties, and software licences 
and maintenance. There is no significant difference between our two operating segments as to their split of revenue by type.
123
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
2. Revenue disaggregation and segmental analysis continued
The analysis of revenue by geographical market was:	
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
APAC total
 318,836 
 310,637 
UK (country of domicile)
 37,956 
 38,899 
EMEA, excluding UK
 170,077 
 177,582 
EMEA total
 208,033 
 216,481 
Americas total
 164,432 
 161,455 
Total Group revenue
 691,301 
 688,573 
Revenue in the previous table has been allocated to regions based on the geographical location of the customer. Countries with 
individually significant revenue figures in the context of the Group were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
China
 177,155 
155,360
USA
 138,836 
138,721
Germany
 54,572 
61,565
Japan
 49,329 
67,915
There was no revenue from transactions with a single external customer which amounted to more than 10% of the Group’s total revenue.
3. Employee costs
The remuneration costs of our people account for a significant proportion of our total expenditure, which are analysed in 
this note.
The aggregate employee costs for the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Wages and salaries
 233,536 
 226,126 
Compulsory social security contributions
 27,130 
 26,579 
Contributions to defined contribution pension schemes
 27,851 
 26,142 
Share-based payment charge
 883 
 677 
Total payroll costs
 289,400 
 279,524 
Wages and salaries and compulsory social security contributions include £10.0m (2023: £11.3m) relating to performance bonuses.
The average number of people employed by the Group during the year was:
2024
Number
2023
Number
UK
3,400
3,332
Overseas
1,813
1,804
Average number of employees
5,213
 5,136 
Key management personnel have been assessed to be the Directors of the Company and the Senior Leadership Team (SLT), which 
was an average of 22 people (2023: 21 people).
The total remuneration of the Directors and the SLT was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Short-term employee benefits
 6,139 
5,659
Post-employment benefits
 529 
511
Share-based payment charge
 883 
677
Total remuneration of key management personnel
 7,551 
6,847
Short-term employee benefits include £0.2m (2023: nil) relating to performance bonuses payable in cash.
The share-based payment charge relates to share awards granted in previous years, not yet vested. Shares equivalent to £0.2m 
(2023: nil) are to be awarded in respect of FY2024 (see Note 24).
Further details of Directors’ remuneration are given in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Notes continued
124
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

4. Cost of sales
Our cost of sales includes the costs to manufacture our products and our engineering spend on existing and new 
products, net of capitalisation and research and development tax credits.
Included in cost of sales are the following amounts:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Production costs
269,562
 247,665 
Research and development expenditure
71,060
 72,500 
Other engineering expenditure
35,723
 28,063 
Gross engineering expenditure
106,783
 100,563 
Development expenditure capitalised (net of amortisation) 
(4,287)
(5,298) 
Development expenditure impaired
3,299
 1,611 
Research and development tax credit
(7,699)
(6,633) 
Total engineering costs
98,096
 90,243 
Total cost of sales
367,658
 337,908 
Production costs includes the raw material and component costs, payroll costs and sub-contract costs, and allocated overheads 
associated with manufacturing our products.
Research and development expenditure includes the payroll costs, material costs and allocated overheads attributed to projects 
identified as relating to new products or processes. Other engineering expenditure includes the payroll costs, material costs and 
allocated overheads attributed to projects identified as relating to existing products or processes.
5. Financial income and expenses
Financial income mainly arises from bank interest on our deposits. We are also exposed to realised currency gains 
and losses on translation of foreign currency denominated intragroup balances and offsetting financial instruments.
Included in financial income and expenses are the following amounts:
Financial income
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Bank interest receivable
 9,110 
 6,302 
Interest on pension schemes’ assets
 2,908 
 1,639 
Fair value gains from one-month forward currency contracts
 318 
 1,728 
Total financial income
 12,336 
 9,669 
Financial expenses
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Interest on pension schemes’ liabilities
–
 29 
Currency losses
 1,645 
 1,130 
Lease interest
 537 
 348 
Interest payable on amounts owed to joint ventures
 55 
–
Interest payable on borrowings
 36 
 46 
Other interest payable
 16 
308
Total financial expenses
 2,289 
1,861
Currency losses relate to revaluations of foreign currency-denominated balances using latest reporting currency exchange rates. 
The losses recognised in FY2023 and FY2024 largely related to an appreciation of Sterling relative to the US dollar affecting US 
dollar-denominated intragroup balances in the Company.
Rolling one-month forward currency contracts are used to offset currency movements on certain intragroup balances, with fair value 
gains and losses being recognised in financial income or expenses. See Note 25 for further details.
125
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
6. Profit before tax
Detailed below are other notable amounts recognised in the Consolidated income statement.
Included in the profit before tax are the following costs/(income):
notes
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets, and investment properties
9,10,11
24,195
24,105
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
9
(1,199)
155
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets
12
8,633
7,773
Grant income
–
(2,816)
(3,017)
These costs/(income) can be found within cost of sales, distribution costs and administrative expenses in the Consolidated income 
statement. Further detail on each element can be found in the relevant notes.
Grant income relates to government grants, for R&D activities, which are recognised in the Consolidated income statement as 
a deduction against expenditure. Where grants are received in advance of the related expenses, they are initially recognised in 
the Consolidated balance sheet and released to match the related expenditure. Where grants are expected to be received after 
the related expenditure has occurred, and there is reasonable assurance that we will comply with the grant conditions, amounts 
are recognised to offset the expenditure and an asset recognised. Research and development tax credit (RDEC) is accounted for 
in accordance with IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance.
Costs within Administrative expenses relating to auditor fees included:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Audit of these financial statements
 873 
707 
Audit of subsidiary undertakings pursuant to legislation
 606 
576 
Other assurance
 27 
6
All other non-audit fees
– 
–
Total auditor fees
 1,506 
1,289
7. Taxation
The Group tax charge is affected by our geographic mix of profits and other factors explained in this note. Our expected 
future tax charges and related tax assets are also set out in the deferred tax section, together with our view on whether 
we will be able to make use of these in the future.
Accounting policy
Tax on the profit for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the Consolidated income statement except 
to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in Other comprehensive income, in which case it is recognised in the 
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income 
for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in 
previous years.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting 
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for: 
	
— the initial recognition of goodwill; 
	
— the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit other than in a business 
combination; and 
	
— differences relating to investments in subsidiaries, to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of 
assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent it is probable that future taxable profits (including the future release of deferred 
tax liabilities) will be available, against which the deductible temporary differences can be used, based on management’s 
assumptions relating to the amounts and timing of future taxable profits. Estimates of future profitability on an entity basis are 
required to ascertain whether it is probable that sufficient taxable profits will arise to support the recognition of deferred tax assets 
relating to the corresponding entity.
Notes continued
126
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

7. Taxation continued
The following table shows an analysis of the tax charge:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Current tax:
UK corporation tax on profits for the year
3,748
5,814
UK corporation tax – prior year adjustments
(693)
(1,307)
Overseas tax on profits for the year
14,497
14,161
Overseas tax – prior year adjustments
105
291
Total current tax
 17,657 
 18,959 
Deferred tax:
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
 8,613 
 9,140 
Prior year adjustments
(473)
(1,052)
Derecognition of previously recognised tax losses and excess interest
 427 
 439 
Recognition of previously unrecognised tax losses and excess interest
(519)
(591)
Effect on deferred tax of changes in tax rates
–
 2,068 
 8,048 
 10,004 
Tax charge on profit
 25,705 
 28,963 
The tax for the year is lower (2023: lower) than the UK standard rate of corporation tax of 25.0% (2023: 20.5% weighted). 
The differences are explained as follows:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Profit before tax
 122,594 
 145,065 
Tax at 25.0% (2023: 20.5%)
 30,649 
 29,738 
Effects of:
  Different tax rates applicable in overseas subsidiaries
(4,866)
(1,695)
  Permanent differences
1,028
1,595
  Companies with unrelieved tax losses
93
292
  Share of profits of joint ventures
(970)
(567)
  Tax incentives (patent box and capital allowances super-deduction)
–
(679)
  Prior year adjustments
(1,061)
(2,068)
  Effect on deferred tax of changes in tax rates
–
2,068
  Recognition of previously unrecognised tax losses and excess interest
(519)
(591)
  Derecognition of previously recognised tax losses and excess interest
427
439
  Irrecoverable withholding tax
447
609
  Deferred tax on unremitted earnings
425
–
  Other differences
52
(178)
Tax charge on profit
 25,705 
 28,963 
Effective tax rate
21.0%
20.0%
We operate in many countries around the world and the overall effective tax rate (ETR) is a result of the combination of the varying 
tax rates applicable throughout these countries. The FY2024 ETR has increased mainly due to the increase in the UK tax rate from 
19.0% to 25.0% in April 2023. The UK standard rate of corporation tax applicable to Renishaw is 25% (2023: 20.5% weighted).
The Group’s future ETR largely depends on the geographic mix of profits and whether there are any changes to tax legislation in the 
Group’s most significant countries of operations.
The Finance (No 2) Bill 2023, that includes Pillar Two legislation, was substantively enacted on 20 June 2023 for IFRS purposes. 
The Group has performed an analysis of the potential exposure to Pillar Two income taxes based on the Country by Country Report 
for the constituent entities in the Group for the financial year ended 30 June 2023. The analysis indicates the transitional safe 
harbour relief should apply in respect of the majority of jurisdictions in which the Group operates. The Group expects Pillar Two 
income taxes to arise in Ireland due to its statutory tax rate on trading income being lower than the global minimum tax rate of 
15%. Based on the FY2023 analysis and initial assessment for FY2024, the impact of the Pillar Two rules is not expected to exceed 
a 0.7% increase to the Group’s Effective Tax Rate in FY2025.
127
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
7. Taxation continued
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right of offset and there is an intention to net settle 
the balances. After taking these offsets into account, the net position of £15.9m liability (2023: £18.8m liability) is presented as 
a £17.7m deferred tax asset (2023: £19.9m asset) and a £33.6m deferred tax liability (2023: £38.8m liability) in the Consolidated 
balance sheet. 
Where deferred tax assets are recognised, the Directors are of the opinion, based on recent and forecast trading, that the level of 
profits in current and future years make it more likely than not that these assets will be recovered. 
Deferred tax balances at the end of the year were:
2024
2023
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Net
£’000
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Net
£’000
Property, plant and equipment
549
(29,946)
(29,397)
735
(25,124)
(24,389)
Intangible assets
–
(4,067)
(4,067)
–
(3,922)
(3,922)
Intragroup trading (inventories)
15,147
–
15,147
16,765
–
16,765
Intragroup trading (fixed assets)
1,101
–
1,101
1,770
–
1,770
Defined benefit pension schemes
–
(2,445)
(2,445)
6
(14,354)
(14,348)
Derivatives
–
(3,637)
(3,637)
–
(2,184)
(2,184)
Tax losses
1,823
–
1,823
2,281
–
2,281
Other
6,895
(1,330)
5,565
5,894
(693)
5,201
Balance at the end of the year
25,515
(41,425)
(15,910)
27,451
(46,277)
(18,826)
Other deferred tax assets include temporary differences relating to inventory provisions totalling £2.9m (2023: £2.3m), other 
provisions (including bad debt provisions) of £1.0m (2023: £0.9m), and employee benefits relating to Renishaw plc of £1.1m 
(2023: £0.8m) and Renishaw KK of £0.8m (2023: £0.8m), with the remaining balance relating to several other smaller 
temporary differences.
The movements in the deferred tax balance during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
(18,826)
78
Movements in relation to property, plant and equipment
(5,008)
(4,940)
Movements in relation to intangible assets
(145)
(942)
Movements in relation to intragroup trading (inventories)
(1,618)
(3,393)
Movements in relation to intragroup trading (fixed assets)
(669)
313
Movements in relation to defined benefit pension schemes
(521)
(229)
Movements in relation to tax losses
(458)
(1,612)
Movements in relation to other
371
799
Movements in the Consolidated income statement
(8,048)
(10,004)
Movements in relation to the cash flow hedging reserve
(1,453)
(5,692)
Movements in relation to the defined benefit pension scheme assets/liabilities
12,424
(3,071)
Movements in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense
10,971
(8,763)
Currency adjustment
(7)
(137)
Balance at the end of the year
(15,910)
(18,826)
Deferred tax assets of £1.8m (2023: £2.3m) in respect of losses are recognised where it is considered likely that the business will 
generate sufficient future taxable profits. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of tax losses carried forward 
of £6.1m (2023: £6.6m), due to uncertainty over their offset against future taxable profits and therefore their recoverability. These 
losses are held by Group companies in Brazil, Australia, Canada, UAE and the US, where for 77% of losses there are no time 
limitations on their utilisation.
In determining profit forecasts for each Group company, the key variable is the revenue forecasts, which have been estimated using 
consistently applied external and internal data sources. Sensitivity analysis indicates that a reduction of 5% to relevant revenue 
forecasts would result in an impairment to deferred tax assets recognised in respect of losses and intragroup trading (inventories) 
of around £0.3m. An increase of 5% to relevant revenue forecasts would result in additions to deferred tax assets in respect of tax 
losses not recognised of around £0.5m.
It is likely that the majority of unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries would qualify for the UK dividend exemption. However, 
£68.3m (2023: £65.6m) of those earnings may still result in a tax liability principally as a result of withholding taxes levied by the 
overseas jurisdictions in which those subsidiaries operate. These tax liabilities are not expected to exceed £4.3m (2023: £4.3m), 
of which £0.4m (2023: nil) has been provided on the basis that the Group expects to remit these amounts.
Notes continued
128
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

8. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is the amount of profit generated in a financial year attributable to equity shareholders, 
divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year.
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated on earnings of £96,889,000 (2023: £116,102,000) and on 72,719,565 shares 
(2023: 72,719,565 shares), being the number of shares in issue. The number of shares excludes 68,978 (2023: 68,978) shares 
held by the Employee Benefit Trust (EBT). On this basis, earnings per share (basic and diluted) is calculated as 133.2 pence 
(2023: 159.7 pence).
There is no difference between the weighted average earnings per share and the basic and diluted earnings per share.
There is no difference between statutory and adjusted earnings per share in FY2024. For the calculation of adjusted earnings per 
share in FY2023, per Note 29, earnings of £116,102,000 were adjusted by post-tax amounts for: 
	
— fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (reported in Revenue), which represented the 
amount by which revenue would change had all the derivatives qualified as eligible for hedge accounting, £5,488,000 gain;
	
— fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (reported in Gains/(losses) from the fair value 
of financial instruments), £1,133,000 loss; 
	
— a revised estimate of 2020 restructuring costs, £570,000 gain; and
	
— a US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost, £1,626,000 loss.
9. Property, plant and equipment
The Group makes significant investments in distribution and manufacturing infrastructure. During the year we have 
completed the expansion of our production facility in Wales, UK, invested in our manufacturing equipment, 
and purchased distribution facilities in Brazil and the United Arab Emirates.
Accounting policy 
Freehold land is not depreciated. Other assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment 
losses, if any. Depreciation is provided to write off the cost of assets less their estimated residual value on a straight-line basis 
over their estimated useful economic lives as follows: freehold buildings, 50 years; building infrastructure, 10 to 50 years; plant 
and equipment, 3 to 25 years; and vehicles, 3 to 4 years.
Year ended 30 June 2024
Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Assets in the
course of
construction
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2023
213,385
273,156
7,112
53,469
547,122
Reclassification
3,669
(3,669)
–
−
–
Additions
2,412
10,615
308
51,912
65,247
Transfers
42,637
6,151
–
(48,788)
–
Disposals
(2,916)
(6,810)
(1,245)
–
(10,971)
Currency adjustment
(3,651)
(1,254)
(76)
–
(4,981)
At 30 June 2024
255,536
278,189
6,099
56,593
596,417
Depreciation
At 1 July 2023
45,647
209,546
5,844
–
261,037
Reclassification
540
(540)
–
–
–
Charge for the year
4,378
14,526
382
–
19,286
Disposals
(658)
(5,951)
(1,086)
–
(7,695)
Currency adjustment
(447)
(743)
(61)
–
(1,251)
At 30 June 2024
49,460
216,838
5,079
–
271,377
Net book value
At 30 June 2024
206,076
61,351
1,020
56,593
325,040
At 30 June 2023
167,738
63,610
1,268
53,469
286,085
Profit/loss on disposals of Property, plant and equipment amounted to £1.2m profit (2023: £0.2m loss).
Additions to assets in the course of construction comprise £36.5m (2023: £42.6m) for land and buildings and £15.4m (2023: £11.4m) 
for plant and equipment. 
At 30 June 2024, properties with a net book value of £45.9m (2023: £88.8m) were subject to a fixed charge to secure the 
UK defined benefit pension scheme liabilities.
129
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
9. Property, plant and equipment continued
Year ended 30 June 2023
Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Assets in the
course of
construction
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2022
217,820
263,557
7,520
7,481
496,378
Additions
1,730
16,934
1,033
54,075
73,772
Transfers
3,240
4,847
–
(8,087)
–
Disposals
(5,383)
(9,681)
(1,369)
–
(16,433)
Currency adjustment
(4,022)
(2,501)
(72)
–
(6,595)
At 30 June 2023
213,385
273,156
7,112
53,469
547,122
Depreciation
At 1 July 2022
43,816
202,214
6,495
–
252,525
Charge for the year
4,175
14,891
576
–
19,642
Disposals
(1,619)
(5,544)
(1,167)
–
(8,330)
Currency adjustment
(725)
(2,015)
(60)
–
(2,800)
At 30 June 2023
45,647
209,546
5,844
–
261,037
Net book value
At 30 June 2023
167,738
63,610
1,268
53,469
286,085
At 30 June 2022
174,004
61,343
1,025
7,481
243,853
10. Right-of-use assets
The Group leases mostly properties and cars from third parties and recognises an associated right-of-use asset where 
we are afforded control and economic benefit from the use of the asset.
Accounting policy 
At the commencement date of a lease arrangement the Group recognises a right-of-use asset for the leased item and a lease 
liability for any payments due. Right-of-use assets are initially measured at cost, being the present value of the lease liability plus 
any initial costs incurred in entering the lease and less any incentives received. See Note 21 for further detail on lease liabilities. 
Right-of-use assets are subsequently depreciated on a straight-line basis from the commencement date to the earlier of the end 
of the useful life or the end of the lease term.
Year ended 30 June 2024
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Net book value
At 1 July 2023
5,069
89
3,244
8,402
Additions
7,320
51
3,843
11,214
Reductions
–
–
(3)
(3)
Depreciation
(2,434)
(73)
(2,146)
(4,653)
Currency adjustment
(56)
(1)
(157)
(214)
At 30 June 2024
9,899
66
4,781
14,746
Year ended 30 June 2023
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Net book value
At 1 July 2022
8,055
117
1,778
9,950
Additions
261
64
2,907
3,232
Depreciation
(308)
–
(13)
(321)
Impairment
(2,737)
(93)
(1,392)
(4,222)
Currency adjustment
(202)
1
(36)
(237)
At 30 June 2023
5,069
89
3,244
8,402
Notes continued
130
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

11. Investment properties
The Group’s investment properties consist of five properties in the UK, Ireland and India, which are occupied by 
rent-paying third parties.
Accounting policy
Where property owned by the Group is deemed to be held to earn rentals or for long-term capital appreciation it is recognised 
as investment property. 
Where a property is part-occupied by the Group, portions of the property are recognised as investment property if they meet the 
above description and if these portions could be sold separately and reliably measured. If the portions could not be sold separately, 
the property is recognised as an investment property only if a significant proportion is held for rental or appreciation purposes.
The Group has elected to value investment properties on a cost basis, initially comprising an investment property’s purchase price 
and any directly attributable expenditure. Depreciation is provided to write off the cost of assets on a straight-line basis over their 
estimated useful economic lives, being 50 years. Amounts relating to freehold land is not depreciated.
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Cost
Balance at the beginning of the year
11,896
11,905
Additions
271
252
Currency adjustment
(64)
(261)
Balance at the end of the year
12,103
11,896
Depreciation
Balance at the beginning of the year
1,573
1,337
Charge for the year
256
240
Currency adjustment
(11)
(4)
Balance at the end of the year
1,818
1,573
Net book value
10,285
10,323
The Group has no restrictions on the realisability of its investment properties and no contractual obligations to purchase, construct 
or develop investment properties.
Amounts recognised in the Consolidated income statement relating to investment properties:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Rental income derived from investment properties
829
 915 
Direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance)
247
 258 
Profit arising from investment properties
582
 657 
The fair value of the Group’s investment properties totalled £14.7m at 30 June 2024 (2023: £14.7m). Fair values of each investment 
property have been determined within the last three years by independent valuers who hold recognised and relevant professional 
qualifications and have recent experience in the location and category of each investment property being valued. These valuations 
have been assessed to be materially appropriate at 30 June 2024. 
131
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
12. Intangible assets
Our Consolidated balance sheet contains significant intangible assets, mostly in relation to goodwill, which arises when 
we acquire a business and pay a higher amount than the fair value of its net assets, and capitalised development costs. 
We make significant investments into the development of new products, which is a key part of our business model, 
and some of these costs are initially capitalised and then expensed over the lifetime of future sales of that product.
Accounting policy
Goodwill arising on acquisition represents the difference between the cost of the acquisition and the fair value of the net 
identifiable assets acquired, net of deferred tax. Identifiable intangibles are those which can be sold separately or which arise 
from legal rights regardless of whether those rights are separable.
Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. It is not amortised but is tested annually for impairment or 
earlier if there are any indications of impairment. The annual impairment review involves comparing the carrying amount to the 
estimated recoverable amount and recognising an impairment loss if the recoverable amount is lower. Impairment losses are 
recognised in the Consolidated income statement.
Intangible assets such as customer lists, patents, trade marks, know-how and intellectual property that are acquired by the Group 
are stated at cost less amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged to the Consolidated income statement on 
a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets 
included in the Consolidated balance sheet reflect the benefit derived by the Group and vary from five to 10 years.
Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the Consolidated income statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on 
development activities is capitalised if: the product or process is technically and commercially feasible; the Group intends and has 
the technical ability and sufficient resources to complete development; future economic benefits are probable; and the Group can 
measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products or processes. 
The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of overheads. 
Other development expenditure is recognised in the Consolidated income statement as an expense as incurred.
Capitalised development expenditure is amortised over the useful economic life appropriate to each product or process, ranging 
from five to 10 years, and is stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and less accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation 
commences when a product or process is available for use as intended by management. Capitalised development expenditure 
is removed from the balance sheet 10 years after being fully amortised.
All non-current assets are tested for impairment whenever there is an indication that their carrying value may be impaired. 
An impairment loss is recognised in the Consolidated income statement to the extent that an asset’s carrying value exceeds 
its recoverable amount, which represents the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use. An asset’s 
value-in-use represents the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset or from the cash-
generating unit to which it relates. The present value is calculated using a discount rate that reflects the current market 
assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset concerned.
Goodwill and capitalised development costs are subject to an annual impairment test.
Key judgement – Whether a project meets the criteria for capitalisation
Product development costs are capitalised once a project has reached a certain stage of development, being the point at which 
the product has passed testing to demonstrate it meets the technical specifications of the project and it satisfies all applicable 
regulations. Judgements is required to assess whether the new product development has reached the appropriate point for 
capitalisation of costs to begin. These costs are subsequently amortised over their useful economic life once ready for use. 
Should a product become obsolete, the accumulated capitalised development costs would need to be immediately written off 
in the Consolidated income statement.
Key estimate – Estimates of future cash flows used for impairment testing
Determining whether goodwill and capitalised development costs are impaired requires an estimation of the value-in-use of 
cash-generating units (CGUs) to which goodwill has been allocated. To calculate the value-in-use we need to estimate the future 
cash flows of each CGU and select the appropriate discount rate for each CGU.
Notes continued
132
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

12. Intangible assets continued
Year ended 30 June 2024
Goodwill
£’000
Internally
generated
development
costs
£’000
Software 
licences
£’000
Intellectual 
property and 
other intangible
assets
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2023
20,261
178,660
11,978
4,875
215,774
Additions
–
9,281
246
–
9,527
Currency adjustment
(3)
–
(27)
(11)
(41)
At 30 June 2024
20,258
187,941
12,197
4,864
225,260
Amortisation
At 1 July 2023
9,028
146,221
11,605
2,452
169,306
Charge for the year
–
5,011
165
158
5,334
Impairment
–
3,299
–
–
3,299
Currency adjustment
–
–
(19)
(3)
(22)
At 30 June 2024
9,028
154,531
11,751
2,607
177,917
Net book value
At 30 June 2024
11,230
33,410
446
2,257
47,343
At 30 June 2023
11,233
32,439
373
2,423
46,468
Year ended 30 June 2023
Goodwill
£’000
Internally
generated
development
costs
£’000
Software 
licences
£’000
Intellectual 
property and 
other intangible
assets
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2022
20,475
168,212
22,379
4,629
215,695
Additions
–
10,448
125
254
10,827
Disposals
–
–
(10,518)
–
(10,518)
Currency adjustment
(214)
–
(8)
(8)
(230)
At 30 June 2023
20,261
178,660
11,978
4,875
215,774
Amortisation
At 1 July 2022
9,028
139,460
20,749
2,240
171,477
Charge for the year
–
5,150
833
179
6,162
Impairment
–
1,611
–
–
1,611
Disposals
–
–
(9,969)
–
(9,969)
Currency adjustment
–
–
(8)
33
25
At 30 June 2023
9,028
146,221
11,605
2,452
169,306
Net book value
At 30 June 2023
11,233
32,439
373
2,423
46,468
At 30 June 2022
11,447
28,752
1,630
2,389
44,218
133
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
12. Intangible assets continued
Goodwill
Goodwill has arisen on the acquisition of several businesses and has an indeterminable useful life. It is therefore not amortised but is 
instead tested for impairment annually and at any point during the year when an indicator of impairment exists. Goodwill is allocated 
to cash generating units (CGUs), as set out below. This is the lowest level in the Group at which goodwill is monitored for impairment.
The analysis of goodwill according to business acquired is:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
itp GmbH
 2,934 
 2,985 
Renishaw Mayfield S.A.
 2,089 
 2,089 
Renishaw Fixturing Solutions, LLC
 5,497 
 5,454 
Other smaller acquisitions
 710 
 705 
Total goodwill
 11,230 
 11,233 
The recoverable amounts of acquired goodwill are based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations use cash flow projections 
based on the financial business plans approved by management for the next five financial years. The cash flows beyond this 
forecast are extrapolated to perpetuity using a nil growth rate on a prudent basis, to reflect the uncertainties over forecasting beyond 
five years.
The following pre-tax discount rates have been used in discounting the projected cash flows:
Business acquired
CGU
2024
Discount rate
2023
Discount rate
itp GmbH
itp GmbH entity (‘ITP’)
13.6%
13.2%
Renishaw Fixturing Solutions, LLC
Renishaw plc (‘PLC’)
14.6%
14.3%
Renishaw Mayfield S.A.
Renishaw Mayfield S.A. entity (‘Mayfield’)
24.6%
26.3%
The Group post-tax weighted average cost of capital, calculated at 30 June 2024, is 10.7% (2023: 10.7%). Pre-tax discount rates for 
Manufacturing technologies CGUs (ITP and PLC) are calculated from this basis, given that they are aligned with the wider Group’s 
industries, markets and processes. The Analytical instruments and medical devices’ CGU (Mayfield) has a higher risk weighting, 
reflecting the less mature nature of this segment. 
CGU specific five-year business plans have been used in determining cash flow projections. Within these plans, revenue forecasts are 
calculated with reference to external market data, past outperformance, and new product launches, consistent with revenue forecasts 
across the Group. Production costs, engineering costs, distribution costs and administrative expenses are calculated based on 
management’s best estimates of what is required to support revenue growth and new product development. Estimates of capital 
expenditure and working capital requirements are also included in the cash flow projections. The key estimate within these business 
plans is the forecasting of revenue growth, given that the cost bases of the businesses can be flexed in line with revenue 
performance. Given the average revenue growth assumptions included in the five-year business plans, management’s sensitivity 
analysis involves modelling a reduction in the forecast cash flows utilised in those business plans and therefore into perpetuity. 
For there to be an impairment in the PLC, ITP or Mayfield CGUs, the discount rate would need to increase to at least 17%, 
23% and 42% respectively, or there would need to be a reduction to forecast cash flows of 16%, 44% and 43% respectively.
Internally generated development costs
The key assumption in determining the value-in-use for internally generated development costs is the forecast unit sales over the 
useful economic life, which is determined by management using their knowledge and experience with similar products and the 
sales history of products already available in the market. Resulting cash flow projections over five to 10 years, the period over which 
product demand forecasts can be reasonably predicted and internally generated development costs are written off, are discounted 
using pre-tax discount rates, which are calculated from the Group post-tax weighted average cost of capital of 10.7% (2023: 10.7%).
There were impairments of internally generated development costs in the year of £3.3m (2023: £1.6m). This includes a £2.0m 
impairment for Renishaw Central, our smart manufacturing data platform for industrial process control, where the near-term cash 
flows are uncertain in a market new to Renishaw. The remaining £1.3m covers two lower value impairments where revenue growth 
is now expected to be lower than previously forecast.
For the largest projects, comprising 94% of the net book value at 30 June 2024, a 10% reduction to forecast unit sales, 
or an increase in the discount rate by 5%, would result in an impairment of less than £0.4m.
Notes continued
134
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

13. Investments in joint ventures
Where we make an investment in a company which gives us significant influence but not full control, we account for our 
share of their post-tax profits in our financial statements. We have joint venture arrangements with two companies, 
RLS and MSP.
The Group’s investments in joint ventures (all investments being in the ordinary share capital of the joint ventures), whose accounting 
years end on 30 June, were:
Country of incorporation and 
principal place of business
2024 
Ownership %
2023 
Ownership %
RLS Merilna tehnika d.o.o. (‘RLS’) – joint venture
Slovenia
50.0
50.0
Metrology Software Products Limited (‘MSP’) – joint venture
England & Wales
70.0
70.0
Although the Group owns 70% of the ordinary share capital of MSP, this is accounted for as a joint venture as the control 
requirements of IFRS 10 are not satisfied. This is because the shareholders agreement includes that for so long as the Group’s 
holding is less than 75% of the total shares of MSP, Renishaw plc agrees to exercise its voting rights such that it only votes as if it has 
the same aggregate shareholding as the remaining Management Shareholders.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
22,414
20,570
Dividends received
(498)
(924)
Share of profits of joint ventures
3,880
2,768
Currency adjustment
(311)
–
Balance at the end of the year
25,485
22,414
During FY2024, Renishaw International Limited (‘RIL’) entered into a 14-day notice deposit agreement with RLS. Interest is payable 
by RIL to RLS at a market rate on a monthly basis. As at 30 June 2024, according to this agreement RIL had received EUR 10.0m 
(£8.5m equivalent), which is recognised as ‘amounts payable to joint venture’ in the Consolidated balance sheet.
Summarised financial information for joint ventures:
RLS
MSP
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Assets
49,295
43,168
5,470
4,539
Liabilities
(6,167)
(4,969)
(442)
(378)
Net assets
43,128
38,199
5,028
4,161
Group’s share of net assets
21,564
19,100
3,520
2,913
Revenue
38,548
35,764
2,947
2,554
Profit for the year
6,546
5,162
867
264
Group’s share of profit for the year
3,273
2,583
607
185
For the nature of the activities, see note C.48.
The financial statements of RLS have been prepared on the basis of Slovenian Accounting Standards. 
The financial statements of MSP have been prepared on the basis of FRS 102.
135
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
14. Leases (as lessor)
The Group acts as a lessor for Renishaw-manufactured equipment on finance and operating lease arrangements. 
This is principally for high-value capital equipment such as our additive manufacturing machines.
Accounting policy
Where the Group transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of lease assets to a third party, the Group recognises a receivable 
in the amount of the net investment in the lease. The lease receivable is subsequently reduced by the principal received, while an 
interest component is recognised as financial income in the Consolidated income statement. Standard contract terms are up to 
five years and there is a nominal residual value receivable at the end of the contract.
Where the Group retains the risks and rewards of ownership of lease assets, it continues to recognise the leased asset in Property, 
plant and equipment. Income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term and recognised as 
revenue rather than other revenue as such income is not material. Operating leases are on one to five year terms.
The total future lease payments are split between the principal and interest amounts below:
2024
2023
Gross 
investment
£’000
Interest
£’000
Net
 investment
£’000
Gross 
investment
£’000
Interest
£’000
Net 
investment
£’000
Receivable in less than one year
 4,761 
 900 
 3,861 
 4,375 
 611 
 3,764 
Receivable between one and two years
 5,903 
 765 
 5,138 
 3,600 
 447 
 3,153 
Receivable between two and three years
 4,038 
 347 
 3,691 
 3,283 
 289 
 2,994 
Receivable between three and four years
 2,072 
 138 
 1,934 
 2,478 
 151 
 2,327 
Receivable between four and five years
 1,264 
 83 
 1,181 
 1,502 
 41 
 1,461 
Total future minimum lease payments receivable
 18,038 
 2,233 
 15,805 
 15,238 
 1,539 
 13,699 
Finance lease receivables are presented as £11.9m (2023: £9.9m) non-current assets and £3.9m (2023: £3.8m) current assets in the 
Consolidated balance sheet.
The total of future minimum lease payments receivable under non-cancellable operating leases were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Receivable in less than one year
1,042
1,394
Receivable between one and four years
707
1,569
Total future minimum lease payments receivable
1,749
2,963
During the year, £1.2m (2023: £1.0m) of operating lease income was recognised in revenue.
15. Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits
We have always valued having cash in the bank to protect the Group from downturns and enable us to react swiftly to 
investment or market capture opportunities. We currently hold significant cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits, 
mostly in the UK and spread across several banks with high credit ratings.
Accounting policy
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, and deposits with an original maturity of less than three months or with an 
original maturity date of more than three months where the deposit can be accessed on demand without significant penalty for 
early withdrawal and where the original deposit amount is recoverable in full.
Cash and cash equivalents
An analysis of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Bank balances and cash in hand
75,090
 80,196 
Short-term deposits
47,203 
 1,192 
Balance at the end of the year
 122,293 
 81,388 
Short-term deposits includes a short-term bank deposit in Renishaw plc of £47.1m which matured on 8 July 2024.
Bank deposits
Bank deposits at the end of the year amounted to £95.5m (2023: £125.0m), of which £50.0m matures in December 2024, and 
£43.0m matures in May 2025.
Notes continued
136
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

16. Inventories
We have reduced our inventories in the year, as global supply challenges faced during the previous year have eased, 
and remain committed to high customer delivery performance. 
Accounting policy
Inventory and work in progress is valued at the lower of actual cost on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and net realisable value. 
In respect of work in progress and finished goods, cost includes all production overheads and the attributable proportion of 
indirect overhead expenses that are required to bring inventories to their present location and condition. Overheads are absorbed 
into inventories on the basis of normal capacity or on actual hours if higher. 
Key estimate – Determination of net realisable inventory value
Determining the net realisable value of inventory requires management to estimate future demand, especially in respect of 
provisioning for slow moving and potentially obsolete inventory. When calculating an inventory provision management generates 
an estimate of future demand for individual inventory items (capped at 3 years) based upon the higher of 12 months of historic 
usage or 12 months of demand from customer orders and manufacturing build plans. A 50% provision is calculated where actual 
holdings represent between 3 to 5 years’ worth of future demand, and 100% is calculated where actual holdings represent over 
5 years’ worth of future demand. Adjustments are made where needed, for example where it is highly likely that there will be an 
increase in sales beyond the 12-month demand period or where there are obsolescence programmes. 
This reflects a change from our previous accounting estimate, whereby up to 18 months was used as an initial estimate of future 
demand for the majority of products. This change to 3 years has been based on our experience of previously recognising 
significant exceptions to the initial calculation, our obsolescence programmes are typically planned at least three years in 
advance, and our inventories are not perishable. We have not disclosed the effect of this change in estimate, as it is not practical 
to calculate a provision on the previous basis at 30 June 2024, due to the level of adjustments which varies based on the nature 
of inventory on-hand at each year-end.
An analysis of inventories at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Raw materials
 53,542 
 66,210 
Work in progress
 32,840 
 35,354 
Finished goods
 75,546 
 84,193 
Balance at the end of the year
 161,928 
 185,757 
At the end of the year, the gross cost of inventories which had provisions held against them totalled £29.6m (2023: £24.5m). 
During the year, the amount of write-down of inventories recognised as an expense in the Consolidated income statement was 
£6.2m (2023: £8.2m).
Inventories in Renishaw plc account for 63% of the total Inventories of the Group. A 10% reduction in the estimate of future demand 
for all Renishaw plc inventory items would result in an increase in the write-down of inventories of £0.6m.
17. Provisions
A provision is a liability recorded in the Consolidated balance sheet, where there is uncertainty over the timing or amount 
that will be paid. The main provision we hold relates to warranties provided with the sale of our products. 
Accounting policy
The Group provides a warranty from the date of purchase, except for those products that are installed by the Group where the 
warranty starts from the date of completion of the installation. This is typically for a 12-month period, although up to three years 
is given for a small number of products. A warranty provision is included in the Group financial statements, which is calculated 
on the basis of historical returns and internal quality reports.
Warranty provision movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
 2,758 
 4,244 
Created during the year
 2,633 
 2,382 
Unused amounts reversed
–
(717)
Utilised in the year
(2,394)
(3,151)
239
(1,486)
Balance at the end of the year
 2,997 
 2,758 
The warranty provision has been calculated on the basis of historical return-in-warranty information and other internal reports. 
It is expected that most of this expenditure will be incurred in the next financial year and all expenditure will be incurred within three 
years of the balance sheet date.
137
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
18. Contract liabilities
Contract liabilities represent the Group’s obligation to transfer goods, capital equipment and/or services to a customer 
for which the Group has either received consideration or consideration is due from the customer. Our balances mostly 
comprise advances received from customers and payments for services yet to be completed.
Balances at the end of the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Goods, capital equipment and installation
 210 
 615 
Aftermarket services
 6,955 
 4,793 
Deferred revenue
 7,165 
 5,408 
Advances received from customers
 3,715 
 4,563 
Balance at the end of the year
 10,880 
 9,971 
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied at the end of the year is 
£10.9m (2023: £10.0m). Of this, £1.4m (2023: £2.2m) is not expected to be recognised in the next financial year.
19. Other payables
Separate to our trade payables and contract liabilities, which directly relate to our trading activities, our Other payables 
mostly comprises amounts payable to employees, or relating to employees. 
Balances at the end of the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Payroll taxes and social security
 6,477 
 6,677 
Performance bonuses
 9,990 
 11,338 
Holiday pay and retirement accruals
 9,397 
 7,383 
Indirect tax payable
 5,163 
 4,486 
Other creditors and accruals
 19,317 
 18,246 
Total other payables
 50,344 
 48,130 
Holiday pay accruals are based on a calculation of the number of days’ holiday earned during the year, but not yet taken. 
Other creditors and accruals includes a number of other individually smaller accruals.
20. Borrowings
The Group’s only source of external borrowing is a fixed-interest loan facility in our Japanese subsidiary, entered into 
to directly finance the purchase of a new distribution facility in Japan in FY2019.
Third-party borrowings at 30 June 2024 consist of a loan entered into on 31 May 2019 by Renishaw KK, with original principal of 
JPY 1,447,000,000 (£10,486,000). Principal of JPY 12,000,000 is repayable each month, with a fixed interest rate of 0.81% also paid 
on monthly accretion for the first five years. This loan was extended for an additional five years in May 2024, with a fixed interest rate 
of 1.41% payable for the remaining term, at which time the principal will have been repaid in full. There are no covenants attached 
to this loan.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
4,694
6,079
Interest
36
46
Repayments
(799)
(914)
Currency adjustment
(409)
(517)
Balance at the end of the year
3,522
4,694
Borrowings are held at amortised cost. There is no significant difference between the book value and fair value of borrowings, which 
is estimated by discounting contractual future cash flows, which represents level 2 of the fair value hierarchy defined in Note 25.
Notes continued
138
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

21. Leases (as lessee)
The Group leases distribution properties and cars from third parties and recognises an associated lease liability for the 
total present value of payments the lease contracts commit us to.
Accounting policy
At the commencement date of a lease arrangement the Group recognises a right-of-use asset for the leased item and a lease 
liability for any payments due. Lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid 
at the commencement date, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate of the applicable entity. The lease liability is 
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method and is remeasured if there is a change in future 
lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate (such as an inflation-linked increase) or if there is a change in the 
Group’s assessment of whether it will exercise an extension or termination option. When this happens there is a corresponding 
adjustment to the right-of-use asset. Where the Group enters into leases with a lease term of 12-months or less, these are treated 
as ‘short-term’ leases and are recognised on a straight-line basis as an expense in the Consolidated income statement. The same 
treatment applies to low-value assets, which are typically IT equipment and office equipment.
Lease liabilities are analysed as below:
2024
Leasehold 
property
£’000
Plant and 
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Due in less than one year
 2,396 
 36 
 2,161 
 4,593 
Due between one and two years
 2,137 
 22 
 1,816 
 3,975 
Due between two and three years
 1,862 
 7 
 1,035 
 2,904 
Due between three and four years
 1,549 
 1 
 205 
 1,755 
Due between four and five years
 1,001 
 – 
 8 
 1,009 
Due in more than five years
 4,454 
–
–
 4,454 
Total future minimum lease payments payable
 13,399 
 66 
 5,225 
 18,690 
Effect of discounting
(3,311) 
(2) 
(355) 
(3,668) 
Lease liabilities
 10,088 
 64 
 4,870 
 15,022 
2023
Leasehold 
property
£’000
Plant and 
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Due in less than one year
1,737
21
1,520
3,278
Due between one and two years
691
13
1,192
1,896
Due between two and three years
510
13
858
1,381
Due between three and four years
351
6
387
744
Due between four and five years
110
1
66
177
Due in more than five years
3,481
–
–
3,481
Total future minimum lease payments payable
6,880
54
4,023
10,957
Effect of discounting
(1,566)
(1)
(756)
(2,324)
Lease liabilities
5,314
53
3,267
8,633
Lease liabilities are also presented as a £4.0m (2023: £3.0m) current liability and a £11.1m (2023: £5.6m) non-current liability in the 
Consolidated balance sheet. 
Amounts recognised in the Consolidated income statement relating to leases were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Depreciation of right-of-use assets
4,653
4,223
Interest expense on lease liabilities
537
348
Expenses relating to short-term and low-value leases
138
471
Total expense recognised in the Consolidated income statement
5,328
5,042
Total cash outflows for leases
5,034
5,025
139
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
22. Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
1 July 2023
Cash flows
Other
Currency
30 June 2024
Lease liabilities
8,633
(4,359)
 10,967 
(219)
 15,022 
Borrowings
4,694
(799)
 36 
(409)
 3,522 
13,327
(5,158)
 11,003 
(628)
 18,544 
1 July 2022
Cash flows
Other
Currency
30 June 2023
Lease liabilities
10,180
(4,206)
 2,918 
(259)
 8,633 
Borrowings
6,079
(914)
 46 
(517)
 4,694 
16,259
(5,120)
 2,964 
(776)
 13,327
See Notes 20 and 21 for further details on borrowing and leasing activities. 
23. Employee benefits
The Group operates contributory pension schemes, largely for UK and Ireland employees, which were of the defined 
benefit type up to 5 April 2007 and 31 December 2007 respectively, at which time they ceased any future accrual for 
existing members and were closed to new members. The Group’s largest defined benefit scheme is in the UK. 
Accounting policy
Defined benefit pension schemes are administered by trustees who are independent of the Group finances. Investment assets of 
the schemes are measured at fair value using the bid price of the unitised investments, quoted by the investment manager, at the 
reporting date. For buy-in insurance contracts, where the income received from a policy matches exactly the benefit payments 
due to the members it is covering, the value attributable to the contract to be recognised as an asset is the equivalent IAS 19 
value of the corresponding liabilities.
Pension scheme liabilities are measured using a projected unit method and discounted at the current rate of return on a high-
quality corporate bond of equivalent term and currency to the liability. Remeasurements arising from defined benefit schemes 
comprise actuarial gains and losses, the return on scheme assets (excluding interest) and the effect of the asset ceiling (if any, 
excluding interest). The Company recognises them immediately in Other comprehensive income and all other expenses related 
to defined benefit schemes are included in the Consolidated income statement.
The pension schemes’ surpluses, to the extent that they are considered recoverable, or deficits are recognised in full and presented 
on the face of the Consolidated balance sheet under Employee benefits. Where a guarantee is in place in relation to a pension scheme 
deficit, liabilities are reported in accordance with IFRIC 14 ‘The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and 
their Interaction’. To the extent that contributions payable will not be available as a refund after they are paid into the plan, a liability is 
recognised at the point the obligation arises, which is the point at which the minimum funding guarantee is agreed. Overseas-based 
employees are covered by a combination of state, defined benefit and private pension schemes in their countries of residence. 
Actuarial valuations of overseas pension schemes were not obtained, apart from Ireland. 
For defined contribution schemes, the amount charged to the Consolidated income statement represents the contributions 
payable to the schemes in respect of the accounting period.
Key estimate – Valuation of defined benefit pension schemes’ liabilities
Determining the value of the future defined benefit obligation requires estimation in respect of the assumptions used to determine 
the present values. These include future mortality, discount rate and inflation. Management makes these estimates in consultation 
with independent actuaries.
Key judgement – Whether past service costs need to be recognised
Management also need to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for past service costs, and do so in consultation with 
independent legal advisors and actuaries. 
The total pension cost of the Group for the year was £27.9m (2023: £26.1m), of which £0.1m (2023: £0.1m) related to Directors and 
£6.5m (2023: £6.2m) related to overseas schemes.
The latest full actuarial valuation of the UK defined benefit pension scheme (‘UK scheme’) was carried out as at 30 September 2021 
and updated to 30 June 2024 by a qualified independent actuary. The mortality assumption used for FY2024 is the S3PxA base tables 
and CMI 2023 model, with long-term improvements of 1% per annum. Adjustments have been made to both the core base tables and 
CMI 2023 model to allow for the scheme’s membership profile and best estimate assumptions of future mortality improvements. 
Notes continued
140
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

23. Employee benefits continued
Major assumptions used by actuaries for the UK and Ireland schemes were:
30 June 2024
30 June 2023
UK scheme
Ireland scheme
UK scheme
Ireland scheme
Rate of increase in pension payments
2.95%
2.50%
3.05%
2.70%
Discount rate
5.10%
3.75%
5.10%
3.60%
Inflation rate (RPI)
3.25%
2.50%
3.25%
2.70%
Inflation rate (CPI)
2.25%1
3.25%2
2.50%
2.25%1
3.25%2
2.70%
Retirement age
64
65
64
65
1. Pre-2030    2. Post-2030
The life expectancies from the retirement age of 65 for the UK scheme implied by the mortality assumption at age 65 and 45 are:
2024
years
2023
years
Male currently aged 65
21.1
21.1
Female currently aged 65
23.5
23.5
Male currently aged 45
21.8
21.8
Female currently aged 45
24.4
24.3
The weighted average duration of the UK scheme obligation is around 17 years (2023: 17 years).
The assets and liabilities in the defined benefit pension schemes were:
30 June
2024
£’000
% of
total
assets
30 June
2023
£’000
% of
total
assets
Market value of assets:
  Insurance contract
129,207
 84 
–
–
  Credit and fixed income funds
9,268
 6 
 54,656 
 28 
  Equities
6,861
 4 
 5,729 
 3 
  Multi-asset funds
5,869
 4 
 26,966 
 14 
  Index linked gilts
1,269
 1 
 55,183 
 28 
  Fixed interest gilts
–
–
 13,219 
 7 
  Cash and other
660
–
 40,576 
 21 
153,134
100
196,329
100
Actuarial value of liabilities
(142,289)
–
(138,958)
–
Surplus in the schemes
10,845
–
57,371
–
Deferred tax thereon
(2,445)
–
(14,348)
–
Note C.43 gives the analysis of the UK scheme. For the other schemes, the market value of assets at the end of the year was £14.0m 
(2023: £14.6m) and the actuarial value of liabilities was £11.9m (2023: £14.7m). The UK scheme was in a net surplus position at 
30 June 2024 totalling £8.7m (2023: surplus £57.4m), and is therefore presented in non-current assets in the Consolidated balance 
sheet. The Ireland scheme was in a net asset position at 30 June 2024 totalling £2.1m (2023: £0.1m deficit), and is therefore also 
presented in non-current assets.
During FY2024, the Trustee of the UK scheme undertook a buy-in and insured around 99% of the UK scheme’s liabilities by 
purchasing an insurance policy. This contract was effective from 19 October 2023 and is held in the name of the Trustee. The value 
of the contract is recognised as a UK scheme asset for the purposes of IAS 19. In line with IAS 19.115, for a buy-in insurance contract 
such as this, where the income received from the policy matches exactly the benefit payments due to the members it is covering, the 
value attributable to the contract to be recognised as an asset is the equivalent IAS 19 value of the corresponding liabilities.
The value of the corresponding IAS 19 liabilities for the members covered by the buy-in contract was calculated based on individual 
member data as at 27 January 2023, allowing for known deaths and transfer-outs between 27 January 2023 and 19 October 2023. 
The IAS 19 liabilities in respect of the buy-in policy were lower than the transaction price of the insurance contract. Consequently, 
the value attributable to the insurance contract has reduced from the actual price paid, and the resulting remeasurement loss is 
recognised in the ‘Return on plan assets’ item in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense. The IAS 19 
liabilities as at 19 October 2023 were £118.5m. The final premium paid for the buy-in was £150.4m, and therefore a loss of £31.9m 
has been reflected in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense.
141
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
23. Employee benefits continued
Equities are held in externally-managed funds and primarily relate to UK and US equities. Credit and fixed income funds, and index 
linked gilts relate to UK, US and Eurozone government-linked securities, again held in externally-managed funds. The fair values of 
these equity and fixed income instruments are determined using the bid price of the unitised investments, quoted by the investment 
manager, at the reporting date and therefore represent level 2 of the fair value hierarchy defined in Note 25. Multi-asset funds are 
also held in externally-managed funds, with active asset allocation to diversify growth across asset classes such as equities, bonds 
and money-market instruments. The fair value of these funds is determined on a comparable basis to the equity and fixed income 
funds, and therefore are also level 2 assets. Cash and other at 30 June 2024 mostly comprises amounts held in a Sterling bank 
account, in which the principal is preserved and same day liquidity is available.
No scheme assets are directly invested in the Group’s own equity.
The movements in the schemes’ assets and liabilities were: 
Year ended 30 June 2024
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Total
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
196,329
(138,958)
57,371
Contributions paid
161
–
161
Interest on pension schemes
9,581
(6,673)
2,908
Remeasurement gain/(loss) under IAS 19
(45,054)
(3,634)
(48,688)
Scheme administration expenses
(907)
–
(907)
Benefits paid
(6,976)
6,976
–
Balance at the end of the year
153,134
(142,289)
10,845
Year ended 30 June 2023
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Total
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
 216,749 
(174,504)
 42,245 
Contributions paid
 2,341 
–
 2,341 
Interest on pension schemes
 7,745 
(6,135) 
 1,610 
Remeasurement loss from augmentation of members’ benefits (US)
–
(1,930) 
(1,930)
Remeasurement gain/(loss) under IAS 19
(16,722) 
 30,334 
 13,612 
Scheme administration expenses
(398) 
–
(398) 
(Loss)/gain on settlements
(1,098) 
 989 
(109) 
Benefits paid
(12,288) 
 12,288 
–
Balance at the end of the year
 196,329 
(138,958) 
 57,371
The analysis of the amount recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Actuarial gain/(loss) arising from:
  Changes in demographic assumptions
35
2,028
  Changes in financial assumptions
863
37,318
  Experience adjustment
(4,532)
(9,012)
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
(45,054)
(16,722)
Total amount recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and expense
(48,688)
13,612
The cumulative amount of actuarial gains and losses recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income and 
expense was a loss of £57.5m (2023: loss of £8.8m).
The net surplus of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes, on an IAS 19 basis, has decreased from £57.4m at 30 June 2023 
to £10.8m at 30 June 2024, primarily as a result of the buy-in remeasurement loss.
For the UK scheme, the latest actuarial report prepared in September 2021 shows a deficit of £52.8m, which is based on funding 
to self-sufficiency and uses prudent assumptions. IAS 19 requires best estimate assumptions to be used, resulting in the IAS 19 net 
surplus being higher than the actuarial deficit.
The existing deficit funding plan for the UK scheme is in place until 30 June 2031, at which time any outstanding deficit will be paid. 
The agreement will end sooner if the actuarial deficit (calculated on a self-sufficiency basis) is eliminated in the meantime. The net 
book value of properties subject to fixed charges under this agreement at 30 June 2024 was £45.9m (2023: £88.8m).
The charges may be enforced by the Trustees if one of the following occurs: (a) the Company does not pay funds into the scheme 
in line with the agreed plan; (b) an insolvency event occurs in relation to the Company; or (c) the Company does not pay any deficit 
at 30 June 2031.
Notes continued
142
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

23. Employee benefits continued
Under the Ireland defined benefit pension scheme deficit funding plan, a property owned by Renishaw Ireland (DAC) is subject to 
a registered fixed charge to secure the Ireland defined benefit pension scheme’s deficit.
Benefits in the UK scheme are subject to a DC underpin at the point of retirement or transfer out. Historically, this has been allowed 
for in the accounts in a consistent manner to current administrative practice and the triennial funding valuations. During the buy-in 
process, it was identified that the drafting of the DC underpin in the UK scheme Rules may require that the DC underpin is applied in 
a manner which is different to the administrative practice which has been applied. The Trustee and Company are currently seeking 
legal clarification and advice on this issue, with the intention of correcting the Rules to match administrative practice. No allowance 
for this matter has been made at 30 June 2024, as management have assessed it to be unlikely that there will be an increase in 
liabilities, and due to the uncertainty of legal treatment and therefore any potential impact on liabilities.
In June 2023, the High Court ruled that certain historic amendments made to the rules of the Virgin Media pension scheme were 
invalid without the scheme’s actuary having provided the associated Section 37 certificates. This judgment was upheld by the 
Court of Appeal in July 2024, which has implications on other schemes that were contracted-out on a salary-related basis, and 
made amendments between April 1997 and April 2016. The UK scheme was contracted out until 5 April 2007 and amendments 
were made during the relevant period and as such the ruling could have implications for the UK scheme. The Directors sought 
initial professional advice on this after June 2023 and our expectation is that proper procedures would have been undertaken at 
the time of changes by the Trustees, actuaries and administrators. However, as of the date of approving these financial statements, 
the possible implications, if any, for the UK scheme not having all Section 37 certificates have not been investigated in detail. 
The Trustee and Company will now seek further legal advice on this matter and will act appropriately. Accordingly, no amendments 
for this matter have been included in the IAS 19 actuarial valuation as the impact, if any, cannot be reliably assessed.
For the UK scheme, a guide to the sensitivity of the value of the respective liabilities is as follows:
Variation
Approximate effect on liabilities
UK – discount rate
Increase/decrease by 0.5%
-£9.2m/+£10.3m
UK – future inflation
Increase/decrease by 0.5%
+£7.7m/-£6.6m
UK – mortality
Increased/decreased life by one year
+£4.0m/-£4.1m
24. Share-based payments
The Group provides share-based payment arrangements to certain employees in accordance with the Renishaw plc 
deferred annual equity incentive plan. The Governance section provides information of how these awards are determined.
Accounting policy
Renishaw shares are granted in accordance with the Renishaw plc deferred annual equity incentive plan (the DAEIP). The share 
awards are subject only to continuing service of the employee and are equity settled. The fair value of the awards at the date of 
grant, which is estimated to be equal to the market value, is charged to the Consolidated income statement on a straight-line basis 
over a three-year vesting period, with appropriate adjustments made to reflect expected or actual forfeitures. The corresponding 
credit is to Other reserve. 
The number of shares to be awarded is calculated by dividing the relevant amount of annual bonus under the DAEIP by the 
average price of a share during a period determined by the Remuneration Committee of not more than five dealing days ending 
with the dealing day before the award date. These shares must be purchased on the open market and cannot be satisfied by 
issuance of new shares or transfer of existing treasury shares.
The Renishaw Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) is responsible for purchasing shares on the open market on behalf of the Company 
to satisfy the DAEIP awards. These are held by the EBT until transferring to the employee, which will normally be on the third 
anniversary of the award date, subject to continued employment. Malus and clawback provisions can be operated by the 
Committee within five years of the award date. During the vesting period, no dividends are payable on the shares. However, upon 
vesting, employees will be entitled to additional shares or cash, equivalent to the value of dividends paid on the awarded shares 
during this period. This amount is accrued over the vesting period. 
Own shares held are recognised as an element in equity until they are transferred at the end of the vesting period, and such 
shares are excluded from earnings per share calculations.
The total cost recognised in the FY2024 Consolidated income statement in respect of the DAEIP was £0.9m (2023: £0.7m). 
See Note 26 for reconciliations of amounts recognised in Equity.
In accordance with the DAEIP, shares equivalent to £0.2m (2023: nil) are to be awarded in respect of FY2024. See the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report for further details of the DAEIP.
143
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
25. Financial instruments
The Group has exposure to credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk arising from its use of financial instruments. 
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to these risks, along with the Group’s objectives, policies 
and processes for measuring and managing the risks.
Accounting policy
The Group measures financial instruments such as forward exchange contracts at fair value at each balance sheet date in 
accordance with IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’. Fair value, as defined by IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’, is the price that would 
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement 
date. This note provides detail on the IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy.
Trade and other current receivables are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at amortised cost less any 
provision for bad and doubtful debts and expected credit losses according to IFRS 9. Trade and other current payables are 
initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at amortised cost.
Financial liabilities in the form of loans are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at amortised cost. Financial 
liabilities are assessed for embedded derivatives and whether any such derivatives are closely related. If not closely related, such 
derivatives are accounted for at fair value in the Consolidated income statement.
Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage risks arising from changes in foreign currency rates relating to overseas sales 
and foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The Group does not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. 
Foreign currency derivatives are stated at their fair value, being the estimated amount that the Group would pay or receive to 
terminate them at the balance sheet date, based on prevailing foreign currency rates.
Changes in the fair value of foreign currency derivatives which are designated and effective as hedges of future cash flows are 
recognised in Other comprehensive income and in the Cash flow hedging reserve, and subsequently transferred to the carrying 
amount of the hedged item or the Consolidated income statement. Realised gains or losses on cash flow hedges are therefore 
recognised in the Consolidated income statement within revenue in the same period as the hedged item.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or when the hedging instrument or hedged item 
no longer qualify for hedge accounting. If the forecast transaction is still expected to occur, but is no longer highly probable, 
the cumulative gain or loss in the cash flow hedge reserve remains in that reserve until the transaction occurs. If the forecast 
transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss in the cash flow hedge reserve is immediately reclassified 
to the Consolidated income statement.
Changes in fair value of foreign currency derivatives, which are ineffective or do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting in 
IFRS 9, are recognised in the Consolidated income statement within Gains/losses from the fair value of financial instruments.
In addition to derivatives held for cash flow hedging purposes, the Group uses short-term derivatives not designated as hedging 
instruments to offset gains and losses from exchange rate movements on foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. 
Gains and losses from currency movements on underlying assets and liabilities, realised gains and losses on these derivatives, 
and fair value gains and losses on outstanding derivatives of this nature are all recognised in Financial income and expenses 
in the Consolidated income statement.
Key estimate – Estimates of highly probable forecasts of the hedged item
Derivatives are effective for hedge accounting to the extent that the hedged item is ‘highly probable’ to occur, with ‘highly probable’ 
indicating a much greater likelihood of occurrence than the term ‘more likely than not’. Determining a highly probable sales 
forecast for Renishaw plc and Renishaw UK Sales Limited, being the hedged item, over a multiple year time period, requires 
judgement of the suitability of external and internal data sources and estimations of future sales.
Fair value
There is no significant difference between the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities and their carrying value in the 
Consolidated balance sheet. All financial assets and liabilities are held at amortised cost, apart from the forward foreign currency 
exchange contracts, which are held at fair value, with changes going through the Consolidated income statement unless the 
contracts are subject to hedge accounting.
The fair values of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts have been calculated by a third-party expert, discounting 
estimated future cash flows on the basis of market expectations of future exchange rates, representing level 2 in the IFRS 13 fair 
value hierarchy. The IFRS 13 level categorisation relates to the extent the fair value can be determined by reference to comparable 
market values. The classifications are: level 1 where instruments are quoted on an active market; level 2 where the assumptions 
used to arrive at fair value have comparable market data; and level 3 where the assumptions used to arrive at fair value do not have 
comparable market data.
Notes continued
144
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

25. Financial instruments continued
Credit risk
The Group’s liquid funds are substantially held with banks with high credit ratings and the credit risk relating to these funds is 
therefore limited. The Group carries a credit risk relating to non-payment of trade receivables by its customers. The Group’s policy 
is that credit evaluations are carried out on all new customers before credit is given above certain thresholds. Risk is spread across 
a large number of customers with no significant concentration with one customer or in any one geographical area. The Group 
establishes an allowance for impairment in respect of trade receivables where recoverability is considered doubtful.
An analysis by currency of the Group’s financial assets at the year end is as follows:
Trade and finance lease receivables
Other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents 
and bank deposits
Currency
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Pound Sterling
 17,258 
 17,530 
 24,807 
20,592
 168,781 
 161,489 
US Dollar
 57,209 
 49,609 
 1,613 
 814 
 8,261 
 12,465 
Euro
 30,699 
 28,418 
 2,320 
 1,433 
 10,532 
 6,481 
Japanese Yen
 13,135 
 16,555 
 144 
 137 
 3,358 
 6,481 
Other
 31,577 
 25,014 
 5,192 
 5,003 
 26,903 
 19,472 
 149,878 
 137,126 
 34,076 
27,979
 217,835 
 206,388 
The above Trade and finance lease receivables, Other receivables and Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits are 
predominantly held in the functional currency of the relevant entity, with the exception of £21.3m (2023: £19.7m) of US Dollar-
denominated trade receivables being held in Renishaw (Hong Kong) Limited and £1.6m (2023: £1.7m) of Euro-denominated trade 
receivables being held in Renishaw UK Sales Limited, along with some foreign currency cash balances which are of a short-term nature.
The ageing of trade receivables past due at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Past due zero to one month
 13,250 
 11,808 
Past due one to two months
 7,763 
 3,880 
Past due more than two months
 13,041 
 9,732 
Balance at the end of the year
 34,054 
 25,420 
Movements in the provision for impairment of trade receivables during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
3,438
2,540
Changes in amounts provided
2,264
1,784
Amounts used
(1,223)
(886)
Balance at the end of the year
4,479
3,438
The Group applies the simplified approach when measuring the expected credit loss for trade receivables, with a provision matrix 
used to determine a lifetime expected credit loss. 
For this provision matrix, trade receivables are grouped into credit risk categories, with category 1 being the lowest risk and 
category 5 the highest. Risk scores are allocated to the customer’s country of operation, their type (such as distributor, end user and 
OEM), their industry and the proportion of their debt that was past due at the year-end. These scores are then weighted to produce 
an overall risk score for the customer, with the lowest scores being allocated to category 1 and the highest scores to category 5. 
The matrix then applies an expected credit loss rate to each category, with this rate being determined by adjusting the Group’s 
historic credit loss rates to reflect forward-looking information.
145
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
25. Financial instruments continued
Where certain customers have been identified as having a significantly elevated credit risk these have been provided for on 
a specific basis. Both elements of expected credit loss are shown in the matrix below and have been shown separately so as not 
to distort the expected credit loss rate.
Year ended 30 June 2024
Risk category 1
£’000
Risk category 2
£’000
Risk category 3
£’000
Risk category 4
£’000
Risk category 5
£’000
2024 Total
£’000
Gross trade receivables
14,215
38,781
84,049
1,508
–
138,553
Expected credit loss rate
0.46%
0.50%
0.54%
0.58%
–
0.52%
Expected credit loss allowance
65
193
447
9
–
714
Specific loss allowance
–
4
3,440
322
–
3,766
Total expected credit loss
65
197
3,887
331
 –
4,480
Net trade receivables
14,150
38,584
80,162
1,177
–
134,073
Year ended 30 June 2023
Risk category 1
£’000
Risk category 2
£’000
Risk category 3
£’000
Risk category 4
£’000
Risk category 5
£’000
2023 Total
£’000
Gross trade receivables
3,126
60,826
57,991
4,922
–
126,865
Expected credit loss rate
0.34%
0.38%
0.41%
0.44%
–
0.39%
Expected credit loss allowance
11
228
240
22
–
501
Specific loss allowance
–
219
1,313
1,405
–
2,937
Total expected credit loss
11
447
1,553
1,427
–
3,438
Net trade receivables
3,115
60,379
56,438
3,495
–
123,427
Finance lease receivables are subject to the same approach as noted above for trade receivables. 
Derivative assets are assessed based on the credit risk of the banks counterparty to the forward contracts.
Other receivables include mostly prepayments and indirect tax receivables. Prepayment balances are reviewed at each reporting 
date to confirm that prepaid goods or services are still expected to be received, while tax balances are reviewed for recoverability.
Other receivables at the year end comprised:
2024
£’000
2023*
£’000
Indirect tax receivable
 7,206 
9,304
Software maintenance
 7,816 
5,857
Grants
 875 
1,426
Research and development tax credit recoverable
 4,969 
351
Contract assets
 309 
861
Other prepayments
 12,901 
11,041
Total other receivables
 34,076 
28,840
The maximum exposure to credit risk is £416.7m (2023: £387.2m*), comprising the Group’s trade, finance and other receivables, 
cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits and derivative assets.
The maturities of non-current other receivables, being only derivatives, at the year end were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Receivable between one and two years
1,387
9,443
Receivable between two and five years
–
–
1,387
9,443
*2023 other receivables have been reclassified to include Contract assets, given the relatively low value of this line item. 
Notes continued
146
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

25. Financial instruments continued
Liquidity risk
Our approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that we will always have sufficient liquidity to meet our liabilities 
when due, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. We use monthly cash flow forecasts 
on a rolling 12-month basis to monitor cash requirements.
With Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits at 30 June 2024 totalling £217.8m and £124.1m cash flows generated from 
operating activities in the period, the Group remains in a strong liquidity position.
In respect of Cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits, the carrying value is materially the same as fair value because of the 
short maturity of the bank deposits. Bank deposits are affected by interest rates that are either fixed or floating, which can change 
over time, affecting the Group’s interest income. A decrease of 1% in interest rates would result in a reduction in interest income 
of approximately £2m.
The contractual maturities of financial liabilities at the year end were:
Contractual cash flows
Year ended 30 June 2024
Carrying 
amount
£’000
Effect of
discounting
£’000
Gross 
maturities
£’000
Up to 1 year
£’000
1-2 years 
£’000
3-5 years
£’000
Trade payables
 21,330 
–
 21,330 
 21,330 
–
–
Other payables
 50,344 
–
 50,344 
 50,344 
–
–
Borrowings
 3,522 
138 
3,660
 756 
745
2,159
Forward exchange contracts
 625 
–
 625 
 448 
 177 
–
 75,821 
 138 
75,959
 72,878 
 922 
2,159
Contractual cash flows
Year ended 30 June 2023
Carrying 
amount
£’000
Effect of
discounting
£’000
Gross 
maturities
£’000
Up to 1 year
£’000
1-2 years 
£’000
3-5 years
£’000
Trade payables
 21,551 
–
 21,551 
 21,551 
–
–
Other payables
 48,130 
–
 48,130 
 48,130 
–
–
Borrowings
 4,694 
36
4,730
4,730
–
–
Forward exchange contracts
 5,209 
–
 5,209 
 5,089
 120
–
 79,584 
36
79,620
79,500
120 
–
Market risk
As noted in the Strategic Report under Principal risks and uncertainties, the Group operates in several foreign currencies with the 
majority of sales being made in these non-Sterling currencies, but with most manufacturing being undertaken in the UK, Ireland 
and India.
A large proportion of sales are made in US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen, therefore the Group enters into US Dollar, Euro and 
Japanese Yen derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currency risk, including:
i.	 forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge a significant proportion of the Group’s forecasted US Dollar, Euro and 
Japanese Yen revenues over the next 24 months; and
ii.	 one-month forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset the gains/losses from exchange rate movements arising from 
foreign currency-denominated intragroup balances of the Company. 
147
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
25. Financial instruments continued
The amounts of foreign currencies relating to these forward contracts and options are, in Sterling terms:
2024
2023
Nominal value
£’000
Fair value
£’000
Nominal value
£’000
Fair value
£’000
US Dollar
332,679
7,388
345,010
5,009
Euro
173,089
4,661
179,992
1,389
Japanese Yen
15,581
2,260
30,318
3,209
521,349
14,309
555,320
9,607
The following are the exchange rates which have been applicable during the financial year: 
2024
2023
Currency
Average
forward
contract rate
Year end 
exchange 
rate
Average 
exchange 
rate
Average
forward
contract rate
Year end 
exchange 
rate
Average 
exchange 
rate
US Dollar
1.25
1.27
1.26
1.24
1.27
1.21
Euro
1.13
1.18
1.17
1.13
1.16
1.15
Japanese Yen
140
203
189
141
183
166
Hedging
In relation to the forward currency contracts in a designated cash flow hedge, the hedged item is a layer component of forecast 
sales transactions. Forecast transactions are deemed highly probable to occur and Group policy is to hedge around 75% of net 
foreign currency exposure for USD, EUR and JPY. The hedged item creates an exposure to receive USD, EUR or JPY, while the 
forward contract is to sell USD, EUR or JPY and buy GBP. Therefore, there is a strong economic relationship between the 
hedging instrument and the hedged item. The hedge ratio is 100%, such that, by way of example, £10m nominal value of forward 
currency contracts are used to hedge £10m of forecast sales. Fair value gains or losses on the forward currency contracts are 
offset by foreign currency gain or losses on the translation of USD, EUR and JPY based sales revenue, relative to the forward rate 
at the date the forward contracts were arranged. Foreign currency exposures in HKD and USD are aggregated and only USD 
forward currency contracts are used to hedge these currency exposures. Sources of hedge ineffectiveness according to IFRS 9 
Financial Instruments include: 
	
— changes in timing of the hedged item; 
	
— reduction in the amount of the hedged sales considered to be highly probable; 
	
— a change in the credit risk of Renishaw or the bank counterparty to the forward contract; and 
	
— differences in assumptions used in calculating fair value.
No contracts have become ineffective during the period. A decrease of 10% in the highly probable forecasts would result in around 
£0.5m nominal value of forward contracts becoming ineffective.
Notes continued
148
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

25. Financial instruments continued
For both the Group and the Company, the following table details the fair value of these forward foreign currency derivatives 
according to the categorisations of instruments noted on page 147:
2024
2023
Nominal value
£’000
Fair value
£’000
Nominal value
£’000
Fair value
£’000
Forward currency contracts in a designated cash flow hedge (i)
Non-current derivative assets 
140,109
1,387
268,908
9,443
Current derivative assets
245,577
13,338
118,271
4,461
Current derivative liabilities
790
–
109,434
(5,048)
Non-current derivative liabilities
54,852
(177)
21,148
(120)
441,328
14,548
517,761
8,736
Amounts recognised in the Consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income and expense
–
5,812
–
23,167
Forward currency contracts ineffective as a cash flow hedge (i)
Current derivative liabilities
–
–
–
–
Amounts recognised in Losses from the fair value of financial 
instruments in the Consolidated income statement
–
–
–
(1,399)
Forward currency contracts not in a designated cash flow hedge (ii)
Current derivative assets
17,614
209
17,134
912
Current derivative liabilities
62,407
(448)
20,425
(41)
80,021
(239)
37,559
871
Amounts recognised in Financial income/(expense) in the 
Consolidated income statement
–
318
–
1,728
Total forward contracts and options
Non-current derivative assets
140,109
1,387
268,908
9,443
Current derivative assets
263,191
13,547
135,405
5,373
Current derivative liabilities
63,197
(448)
129,859
(5,089)
Non-current derivative liabilities
54,852
(177)
21,148
(120)
521,349
14,309
555,320
9,607
The total recognised in Revenue in the Consolidated income statement relating to cash flow hedges previously recognised through 
Other comprehensive income amounted to £0.1m gain (2023: £7.7m loss).
For the Group’s foreign currency forward contracts at the balance sheet date, if Sterling appreciated by 5% against the US Dollar, 
Euro and Japanese Yen, this would increase pre-tax equity by £21.0m and increase profit before tax by £3.8m, while a depreciation 
of 5% would decrease pre-tax equity by £23.2m and decrease profit before tax by £4.2m.
149
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
26. Share capital and reserves
The Group defines capital as being the equity attributable to the owners of the Company, which is captioned on the 
Consolidated balance sheet. The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base, ensuring the security of the Group, 
and to maintain a balance between returns to shareholders, with a progressive dividend policy. This note presents figures 
relating to this capital management, along with an analysis of all elements of Equity attributable to shareholders and 
non-controlling interests.
Share capital
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Allotted, called-up and fully paid 72,788,543 ordinary shares of 20p each
14,558
14,558
The ordinary shares are the only class of share in the Company. Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to vote at general meetings 
of the Company and receive dividends as declared. The Articles of Association of the Company do not contain any restrictions on 
the transfer of shares nor on voting rights.
Dividends paid
Dividends paid comprised:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
FY2023 final dividend paid of 59.4p per share (2022: 56.6p)
 43,195 
 41,190 
Interim dividend paid of 16.8p per share (2023: 16.8p)
 12,217 
 12,217 
Total dividends paid
 55,412 
 53,407 
A final dividend of 59.4p per share is proposed in respect of FY2024, which will be payable on 5 December 2024 to shareholders on 
the register on 1 November 2024.
Own shares held
The EBT is responsible for purchasing shares on the open market on behalf of the Company to satisfy the DAEIP awards, 
see Note 24 for further detail. Own shares held are recognised as an element in equity until they are transferred at the end 
of the vesting period.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
(2,963)
(750)
Acquisition of own shares
–
(2,213)
Balance at the end of the year
(2,963)
(2,963)
In November 2021, 14,396 shares were purchased on the open market by the EBT at a price of £52.10, costing a total of £750,017. 
The fair value of these awards at the grant date, being 28 October 2021, was £734,317. These shares will vest on 28 October 2024, 
with no forfeitures expected at 30 June 2024.
In November 2022, 54,582 shares were purchased on the open market by the EBT at a price of £40.24, costing a total of 
£2,212,831. The fair value of these awards at the grant date, being 26 October 2022, was £1,915,000. These shares will vest 
on 26 October 2025, with no forfeitures expected at 30 June 2024.
Other reserve
The other reserve relates to share-based payments charges according to IFRS 2 in relation to the DAEIP, along with historical 
amounts relating to investments in subsidiary undertakings not eliminated on consolidation.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
497
(180)
Share-based payments charge in respect of shares vesting in 2024
 245 
245
Share-based payments charge in respect of shares vesting in 2025
 638 
432
Balance at the end of the year
 1,380 
497
Notes continued
150
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

26. Share capital and reserves continued
Currency translation reserve
The currency translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of 
the overseas operations and currency movements on intragroup loan balances classified as net investments in overseas operations.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
6,772
 14,459 
Loss on net assets of foreign currency operations
(3,811)
(5,905) 
Loss on intragroup loans classified as net investments in foreign operations
(227)
(2,095) 
Tax on translation of net investments in foreign operations
57
 313 
Loss in the year relating to subsidiaries
(3,981)
(7,687) 
Currency exchange differences relating to joint ventures
(311)
–
Balance at the end of the year
2,480
 6,772 
See Note 5 for further information on intragroup loans classified as net investments. 
Cash flow hedging reserve
The cash flow hedging reserve, for both the Group and the Company, comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the 
valuation of forward exchange contracts which are effective hedges and mature after the year end. These are valued on a mark-to-
market basis, are accounted for in Other comprehensive income and expense and accumulated in Equity, and are recycled through 
the Consolidated income statement and Company income statement when the hedged item affects the income statement, or when 
the hedging relationship ceases to be effective. See Note 25 for further detail.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
6,552
(10,923)
Losses on contract maturity recognised in revenue during the year
133
(21,553)
Revaluations during the year
5,679
44,720
Deferred tax movement
(1,453)
(5,692)
Balance at the end of the year
10,911
6,552
Non-controlling interest
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
(577)
(577)
Share of profit for the year
–
–
Balance at the end of the year
(577)
(577)
The non-controlling interest represents the minority shareholdings in Renishaw Diagnostics Limited – 7.6%.
27. Capital commitments
At the end of a financial year, we typically have obligations to make payments in the future, for which no provision is 
made in the financial statements. In FY2022, we committed to the expansion of one of our production facilities in Wales, 
UK, which is expected to cost an additional £12.4m over the next year. We have recently committed £11.4m to renovating 
and expanding our warehousing operation in Germany, which includes expenditure on sustainability initiatives.
Authorised and committed capital expenditure at the end of the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Freehold land and buildings
 26,199 
 35,607 
Plant and equipment 
 16,206 
 11,423 
Motor vehicles
 135 
14 
Total committed capital expenditure
42,540
47,044
151
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
28. Related parties
We report our two joint venture companies, RLS and MSP, as related parties.
Joint ventures and other related parties had the following transactions and balances with the Group:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Purchased goods and services from the Group during the year
250
117
Sold goods and services to the Group during the year
23,026
24,271
Paid dividends to the Group during the year
498
924
Amounts owed to the Group at the year end
243
35
Amounts owed by the Group at the year end
11,422
2,837
Amounts owed by the Group include a 14-day notice deposit agreement with RLS for EUR 10.0m (£8.5m equivalent) (2023: nil), 
see Note 13 for further details. There were no bad debts relating to related parties written off during FY2024 or FY2023.
By virtue of their longstanding voting agreement, Sir David McMurtry (Non-executive Director, 36.23% shareholding) and John Deer 
(Non-executive Deputy Chairman, together with his wife, 16.59%), are the ultimate controlling party of the Group. See page 95 
of the Governance Report for further details in relation to this. The only significant transactions between the Group and these parties 
are in relation to their respective remuneration, as detailed in the Governance Report.
29. Alternative performance measures 
In accordance with Renishaw’s alternative performance measures (APMs) policy and ESMA Guidelines on Alternative 
Performance Measures (2015), this section defines non-IFRS measures that we believe give readers additional useful and 
comparable views of our underlying performance. 
We continue to report Revenue at constant exchange rates, Adjusted profit before tax, Adjusted earnings per share and Adjusted 
operating profit (including by segment) as APMs, which are calculated consistently with previous years. In addition, this year we 
have added Adjusted operating profit at constant exchange rates, Adjusted cash flow conversion from operating activities, and 
Return on invested capital. Aside from Revenue at constant exchange rates, all other APMs exclude infrequently occurring events 
which impact our financial statements, recognised according to applicable IFRS, that we believe should be excluded from these 
APMs to give readers additional useful and comparable views of our underlying performance.
Revenue at constant exchange rates is defined as revenue recalculated using the same rates as were applicable to the previous 
year and excluding forward contract gains and losses. 
Revenue at constant exchange rates:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Statutory revenue as reported
 691,301 
688,573
Adjustment for forward contract (gains)/losses
(133) 
7,815
Adjustment to restate current year at previous year exchange rates
 30,664 
–
Revenue at constant exchange rates
 721,832 
696,388
Year-on-year revenue growth at constant exchange rates
3.7%
–
Year-on-year revenue growth at constant exchange rates for FY2023 was -1.1%.
Adjusted profit before tax, Adjusted profit after tax, Adjusted earnings per share and Adjusted operating profit are defined as the 
profit before tax, earnings per share and operating profit after excluding: 
	
— costs relating to a revision to a provision made in FY2020 relating to restructuring (a); 
	
— a US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost (b); and 
	
— gains and losses in fair value from forward currency contracts which did not qualify for hedge accounting and which have yet 
to mature (c).
a)	Restructuring costs, where applicable during a year, are reported separately in the Consolidated income statement and excluded 
from adjusted measures on the basis that they relate to matters that do not frequently recur. During FY2022, a revised estimate 
of a warranty provision relating to restructuring in FY2020 resulted in a reduction to this provision of £1,688,000, then in FY2023 
a further revision resulted in a reduction of £717,000. As this provision was initially excluded from adjusted measures, the revised 
estimates have also been excluded. 
b) In FY2023, a termination of the US plan (other than distribution of surplus) was completed, with most members opting for lump 
sum payments. It was agreed that the surplus will be distributed to qualifying scheme members. Accordingly, the surplus of 
£2,139,000 has been treated as an augmentation to member benefits, reported separately in the Consolidated income statement 
and excluded from adjusted profit measures. 
c) Gains and losses which recycle through the Consolidated income statement as a result of contracts deemed ineffective during 
FY2020 are also excluded from adjusted profit measures, on the basis that all forward contracts were still expected to be effective 
hedges for Group revenue. This is classified as ‘Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge 
accounting (ii)’ in the following reconciliations.
Notes continued
152
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

29. Alternative performance measures continued
Adjusted profit before tax:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Statutory profit before tax
 122,594 
 145,065 
Revised estimate of FY2020 restructuring provisions
–
(717)
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost
–
2,139
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue
–
(6,903)
  – reported in losses from the fair value of financial instruments
– 
 1,399 
Adjusted profit before tax
 122,594 
 140,983 
Adjusted earnings per share:
2024
pence
2023
pence
Statutory earnings per share
 133.2 
 159.7 
Revised estimate of FY2020 restructuring provisions
–
(0.8)
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost
–
2.2
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue
–
(7.5)
  – reported in losses from the fair value of financial instruments
–
 1.5 
Adjusted earnings per share
 133.2 
 155.1 
Adjusted operating profit:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Statutory operating profit
108,667
 134,489 
Revised estimate of FY2020 restructuring provisions
–
(717)
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost
–
2,139
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue
–
(6,903)
  – reported in losses from the fair value of financial instruments
–
1,399
Adjusted operating profit
108,667
 130,407 
Adjustments to the segmental operating profit:
Manufacturing technologies
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Operating profit before losses from fair value of financial instruments and UK and US defined benefit 
pension schemes’ past service cost
103,181
 132,843 
Revised estimate of FY2020 restructuring provisions
–
(717)
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue
–
(6,644)
Adjusted manufacturing technologies operating profit
103,181
 125,482 
Analytical instruments and medical devices
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Operating profit before losses from fair value of financial instruments and UK and US defined benefit 
pension schemes’ past service cost
5,486
5,184
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue
–
(259)
Adjusted analytical instruments and medical devices operating profit
5,486
 4,925 
Adjusted operating profit at constant exchange rates is defined as Adjusted operating profit recalculated using the same rates as 
applied to the previous year and excluding forward contract gains and losses. 
Adjusted operating profit at constant exchange rates:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Adjusted operating profit
108,667
130,407
Adjustment for forward contract (gains)/losses
(133) 
14,649
Adjustment to restate current year at previous year exchange rates
23,725
–
Adjusted operating profit at constant exchange rates
132,259
145,056
Year-on-year adjusted operating profit reduction at constant exchange rates
-8.8%
–
153
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
29. Alternative performance measures continued
Adjusted cash flow conversion from operating activities is calculated as Adjusted cash flow from operating activities as a proportion 
of Adjusted operating profit. This is useful for the Board to measure how efficient we are at converting operating profit into cash.
Adjusted cash flow conversion from operating activities:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Cash flows from operating activities
124,079
84,297
Income taxes paid
21,752
25,891
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
(74,774)
(84,599)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
4,475
7,948
Adjusted cash flow from operating activities
 75,532 
 33,537 
Adjusted cash flow conversion from operating activities
69.5%
25.7%
Return on invested capital is the Adjusted profit after tax before bank interest receivable as a percentage of the Average invested 
capital in the year. This is useful for the Board to measure our efficiency in allocating capital to profitable activities. 
Adjusted profit after tax before bank interest receivable is calculated as follows: 
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Statutory profit after tax
96,889
116,102
Revised estimate of FY2020 restructuring provisions (net of tax)
–
(570)
US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost (net of tax)
–
1,626
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting (ii):
  – reported in revenue (net of tax)
–
(5,488)
  – reported in losses from the fair value of financial instruments (net of tax)
– 
 1,133 
Adjusted profit after tax
96,889
112,803 
Bank interest receivable (net of tax)
(6,832)
(5,010)
Adjusted profit after tax before bank interest received
 90,057 
 107,793 
Return on invested capital (ROIC):
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
2022
£’000
Total non-current assets
464,765
470,430
402,254
Total current assets
586,618
573,107
590,513
Total current liabilities
(100,948)
(102,320)
(132,697)
Less cash and cash equivalents
(122,293)
(81,388)
(153,162)
Less bank deposits
(95,542)
(125,000)
(100,000)
Invested capital
 732,600 
 734,829 
606,908
Average invested capital
733,715
670,869
–
Return on invested capital
12.3%
16.1%
–
Average invested capital in the year is the average of the invested capital at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year.
Notes continued
154
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

notes
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Assets
Property, plant and equipment
C.31
213,180
177,288
Right-of-use assets
C.32
2,850
2,151
Investment properties
5,863
5,758
Intangible assets
C.33
34,860
34,137
Investments in subsidiaries
C.34
298,174
298,174
Investments in joint ventures
C.35
1,453
1,453
Long-term loans to Group undertakings
C.36
26,249
74,173
Employee benefits
C.43
8,717
57,416
Derivatives
25
1,387
9,443
Total non-current assets
592,733
659,993
Current assets
Inventories
C.38
104,838
122,905
Trade receivables
C.39
48,690
35,675
Current tax
17,582
16,087
Other receivables
18,646
19,490
Derivatives
25
13,452
5,373
Bank deposits
15
71,000
125,000
Cash and cash equivalents
45,963
16,267
Total current assets
320,171
340,797
Current liabilities
Trade payables
13,267
13,810
Provisions
C.40
2,266
2,130
Lease liabilities
C.41
330
15
Derivatives
25
24
5,089
Other payables
C.42
44,862
47,620
Total current liabilities
60,749
68,664
Net current assets
259,422
272,133
Non-current liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
C.37
35,596
41,875
Lease liabilities
C.41
2,621
2,152
Long-term loans from Group undertakings
58
100
Derivatives
25
177
120
Total non-current liabilities
38,452
44,247
Total assets less total liabilities
813,703
887,879
Equity
Share capital
C.44
14,558
14,558
Share premium
42
42
Own shares held
26
(2,963)
(2,963)
Cash flow hedging reserve
26
10,911
6,552
Retained earnings
789,315
868,733
Other reserve
1,840
957
Total equity
813,703
887,879
The Company reported a profit for the financial year ended 30 June 2024 of £14,024,000 (2023: £27,559,000).
These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 11 September 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:
Sir David Grant	
	
Allen Roberts
Directors
Company balance sheet
at 30 June 2024
155
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Year ended 30 June 2023
Share
 capital
£’000
Share
premium
£’000
Own 
shares
 held
£’000
Cash flow
 hedging
reserve
£’000
Retained
earnings
£’000
Other 
reserve
£’000
Total
£’000
Balance at 1 July 2022
14,558
42
(750)
(10,923) 884,077
280
887,284
Profit for the year
−
−
−
−
27,559
−
27,559
Other comprehensive income and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme 
assets/liabilities 
−
−
−
−
10,504
−
10,504
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
−
−
−
17,475
−
−
17,475
Total other comprehensive income and expense
−
−
−
17,475
10,504
27,979
Total comprehensive income and expense
−
−
−
17,475
38,063
−
55,538
Share-based payments charge
−
−
−
−
−
677
677
Own shares purchased
−
−
(2,213)
−
−
−
(2,213)
Dividends paid
−
−
−
−
(53,407)
−
(53,407)
Balance at 30 June 2023
14,558
42
(2,963)
6,552
868,733
957
887,879
Year ended 30 June 2024
Profit for the year
−
−
−
−
14,024
−
14,024
Other comprehensive income and expense (net of tax)
Remeasurement of defined benefit pension scheme 
assets/liabilities
−
−
−
−
(38,030)
−
(38,030)
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges 
−
−
−
4,359
−
−
4,359
Total other comprehensive income and expense
−
−
−
4,359
(38,030)
−
(33,671)
Total comprehensive income and expense
−
−
−
4,359
(24,006)
−
(19,647)
Share-based payments charge
−
−
−
−
−
883
883
Dividends paid
−
−
−
−
(55,412)
−
(55,412)
Balance at 30 June 2024
14,558
42
(2,963)
10,911
789,315
1,840
813,703
Company statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 30 June 2024
156
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

C.30. Accounting policies
The following accounting policies have been applied consistently in dealing with items which are considered material in relation 
to the financial statements of the Company. 
Basis of preparation
The financial statements were prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and Financial Reporting Standard 101 
‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (FRS 101).
The Company has applied the exemptions available under FRS 101 in respect of the following disclosures:
	
— a cash flow statement and related notes;
	
— comparative period reconciliations for share capital, tangible fixed assets and intangible fixed assets;
	
— disclosures in respect of transactions with wholly-owned subsidiaries;
	
— disclosures in respect of capital management;
	
— the effects of new but not yet effective IFRS; and
	
— disclosures in respect of the compensation of key management personnel.
As the consolidated financial statements of the Company include the equivalent disclosures, the Company has also taken the 
exemptions under FRS 101 available in respect of certain disclosures required by IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and the 
disclosures required by IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’.
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the fair value of financial instruments. 
Historical cost is based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for the assets. The principal accounting policies 
are set out below.
Under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own profit and 
loss account.
Critical accounting judgements and estimation uncertainties
The areas of key estimation uncertainty and critical accounting judgement that have a significant risk of causing a material 
adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the next financial year for the Company are consistent with those 
of the Group, as summarised on page 121, excluding in relation to goodwill and in addition to those described below.
Expected credit loss
In accordance with IFRS 9, an expected credit loss model is used to determine a credit loss provision against the carrying value 
of certain trade receivables. Application of this model to the loans to Group undertakings within the Company requires estimation 
by management. The provision has been calculated based on the size of the loan, the probably of default and the loss estimated 
to arise if a default occurred.
Going concern
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors have adopted the going concern basis. The decision to adopt the going 
concern basis was made as part of the assessment of the Group’s going concern status, details of which are set out on page 121. 
Having considered the impact on the Company of the same factors set out on page 121, and the Company’s business model, 
risk management and principal risks, and significant financial resources and cash balances, the Directors have a reasonable 
expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to 
30 September 2025. Accordingly, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial statements.
Investments 
Investments in subsidiary and associated undertakings are stated at cost less any provision for permanent impairment losses. 
Property, plant and equipment, and depreciation
Property, plant and equipment assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided to write off the cost 
of assets less their estimated residual value on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives as follows:
	
— freehold buildings, 50 years, and building infrastructure, 10 to 50 years;
	
— plant and equipment, 3 to 25 years;
	
— motor vehicles, 3 to 4 years; and
	
— no depreciation is provided on freehold land.
Notes to the Company financial statements
157
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
C.30. Accounting policies continued
Right-of-use assets
At the commencement date of a lease arrangement the Company recognises a right-of-use asset for the leased item and a lease 
liability for any payments due. Right-of-use assets are initially measured at cost, being the present value of the lease liability plus 
any initial costs incurred in entering the lease and less any incentives received. Right-of-use assets are subsequently depreciated 
on a straight-line basis from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life or the end of the lease term
Lease liabilities
At the commencement date of a lease arrangement the Company recognises a right-of-use asset for the leased item and a lease 
liability for any payments due. Lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid 
at the commencement date, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate. The lease liability is subsequently measured at 
amortised cost using the effective interest method and is remeasured if there is a change in future lease payments arising from 
a change in an index or rate (such as an inflation-linked increase) or if there is a change in the Company’s assessment of whether 
it will exercise an extension or termination option. When this happens there is a corresponding adjustment to the right-of-use asset. 
Where the Company enters into leases with a lease term of 12-months or less, these are treated as ‘short-term’ leases and are 
recognised on a straight-line basis as an expense. The same treatment applies to low-value assets, which are typically IT equipment 
and office equipment
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of actual cost on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and net realisable value. Cost comprises direct 
materials and labour plus overheads applicable to the stage of manufacture reached.
Intangible assets
Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the income statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on development 
activities is capitalised if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Company intends and has the 
technical ability and sufficient resources to complete development, future economic benefits are probable and the Company can 
measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development. Capitalised development expenditure 
is amortised over the useful economic life appropriate to each product or process, ranging from five to 10 years, and is stated at 
cost less accumulated amortisation and less accumulated impairment losses.
Taxation
The charge for taxation is based on the Company’s profit for the year. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between 
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. 
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as probable that they will be recovered.
Employee benefits
The Company operated a contributory pension scheme, of the defined benefit type up to 5 April 2007, after which this scheme was 
closed for future accruals to existing members and was closed to new members. Since 5 April 2007, the Company has operated 
a defined contribution scheme. 
For the defined contribution scheme, the amount charged as an expense represents the contributions payable to the scheme in 
respect of the accounting period.
The scheme is administered by trustees who are independent of the Company’s finances. 
Pension scheme assets in the defined benefit scheme are measured at fair value using market value. Pension scheme liabilities are 
measured using a projected unit method and discounted at the current rate of return on a high-quality corporate bond of equivalent 
term and currency to the liability. The expected return on the scheme’s assets and the interest on the scheme’s liabilities arising from 
the passage of time are included in other finance income.
The pension scheme’s surplus, to the extent that it is considered recoverable, or deficit is recognised in full and presented on the 
face of the balance sheet. Where a guarantee is in place in relation to a pension scheme deficit, liabilities are reported in accordance 
with IFRIC 14. To the extent that contributions payable will not be available as a refund after they are paid into the plan, a liability 
is recognised at the point the obligation arises, which is the point at which the minimum funding guarantee is agreed.
Accruals are made for holiday pay, based on a calculation of the number of days’ holiday earned during the year but not yet taken, 
and also for performance bonuses, if applicable.
Derivative financial instruments 
In accordance with its treasury policy, the Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. 
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk arising from operational and 
financing activities. Forward exchange contracts are recognised at fair value, being the estimated amount that the Company 
would pay or receive to terminate them at the balance sheet date based on prevailing foreign currency rates. Changes in the fair 
value of foreign currency derivatives which are designated and effective as hedges of future cash flows are recognised in Other 
comprehensive income and in the currency hedging reserve, and subsequently transferred to the carrying amount of the hedged 
item or the income statement. The ineffective part of any gain or loss is recognised in the income statement immediately.
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
158
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

C.30. Accounting policies continued
Other financial instruments
Loans to Group undertakings are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at amortised cost using the effective 
interest rate method. Where such intercompany loans are repayable on demand the Company determines whether any impairment 
provision is required by assessing the company’s ability to repay the loan. Where it is determined that a recipient company does 
not have the capacity to repay the loan at the balance sheet date, or the loan is not repayable on demand, an expected credit loss 
model is used to calculate the impairment provision required.
Trade and other current receivables are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently held at amortised cost less any 
provision for bad and doubtful debts. Trade and other current payables are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently 
held at amortised cost. 
Warranty
The Company provides a warranty from the date of purchase, except for those products that are installed by the Company where 
the warranty starts from the date of completion of the installation. This is typically for a 12-month period, although up to three years 
is given for a small number of products. A warranty provision is included in the accounts, which is calculated on the basis of 
historical returns and internal quality reports.
Foreign currencies
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets 
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into Sterling at the foreign exchange rate 
prevailing at that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on such translation are recognised in the income statement.
C.31. Property, plant and equipment
Year ended 30 June 2024
Freehold
land and
buildings
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Assets in the
course of
construction
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2023
108,375
212,215
3,302
49,461
373,353
Reclassification
3,669
(3,669)
−
−
−
Additions
355
2,547
−
48,090
50,992
Transfers of assets in the course of construction
38,193
5,446
−
(43,639)
−
Disposals
(2,708)
(2,125)
(560)
−
(5,393)
At 30 June 2024
147,884
214,414
2,742
53,912
418,952
Depreciation
At 1 July 2023
26,217
166,703
3,145
−
196,065
Reclassification
540
(540)
−
−
−
Charge for the year
2,477
10,291
104
−
12,872
Released on disposals
(506)
(2,107)
(552)
−
(3,165)
At 30 June 2024
28,728
174,347
2,697
−
205,772
Net book value
At 30 June 2024
119,156
40,067
45
53,912
213,180
At 30 June 2023
82,158
45,512
157
49,461
177,288
At 30 June 2024, properties with a net book value of £45.9m (2023: £88.8m) were subject to a fixed charge to secure the 
UK defined benefit pension scheme liabilities. See Note 23 for additional information.
Additions to assets in the course of construction comprise:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Freehold land and buildings
32,769
37,474
Plant and equipment
15,321
10,788
48,090
48,262
159
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
C.32. Right-of-use assets
Year ended 30 June 2024
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Net book value
At 1 July 2023
1,752
36
363
2,151
Additions
115
−
909
1,024
Depreciation
(25)
(36)
(264)
(325)
At 30 June 2024
1,842
−
1,008
2,850
Year ended 30 June 2023
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Net book value
At 1 July 2022
1,771
43
−
1,814
Additions
−
54
395
449
Depreciation
(19)
(61)
(32)
(112)
At 30 June 2023
1,752
36
363
2,151
C.33. Intangible assets
Year ended 30 June 2024
Goodwill
£’000
Internally
generated
development
costs
£’000
Software
licences,
intellectual 
property and 
other intangible
assets
£’000
Total
£’000
Cost
At 1 July 2023
9,305
172,832
16,469
198,606
Additions
−
9,281
28
9,309
Disposals
(9,305)
−
−
(9,305)
At 30 June 2024
−
182,113
16,497
198,610
Depreciation
At 1 July 2023
9,305
142,377
12,787
164,469
Charge for the year
−
4,939
346
8,584
Impairment
−
3,299
−
−
Released on disposals
(9,305)
−
2
(9,303)
At 30 June 2024
−
150,615
13,135
163,750
Net book value
At 30 June 2024
−
31,498
3,362
34,860
At 30 June 2023
−
30,455
3,682
34,137
There were impairments of internally generated development costs in the year of £3.3m (2023: nil), see Note 12 for further details.
C.34. Investments in subsidiaries
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
298,174
288,174
Additions
−
10,000
Balance at the end of the year
298,174
298,174
During the year, the Company made additional investments of nil (2023: £10.0m). Details of the Company’s subsidiaries are given in 
note C.47.
C.35. Investments in joint ventures
Investments in joint ventures at 30 June 2024 were £1,453,000 (2023: £1,453,000). There were no movements during the year. 
Details of the Company’s joint ventures are given in note C.48.
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
160
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

C.36. Long-term loans to Group undertakings
Amounts owed by Group undertakings at 30 June 2024 amounted to £26.2m (2023: £74.2m). 
This included expected credit loss provisions of £32.4m (2023: £23.5m). 
These amounts are unsecured and accrue variable interest.
C.37. Deferred tax
Balances at the end of the year were:
2024
2023
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Net
£’000
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Net
£’000
Property, plant and equipment
−
(27,174)
(27,174)
−
(22,506)
(22,506)
Intangible assets
−
(3,751)
(3,751)
−
(3,592)
(3,592)
Defined benefit pension scheme
−
(2,179)
(2,179)
−
(14,354)
(14,354)
Derivatives
−
(3,637)
(3,637)
−
(2,184)
(2,184)
Other
1,145
−
1,145
761
−
761
Balance at the end of the year
1,145
(36,741)
(35,596)
761
(42,636)
(41,875)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right of offset and there is an intention to net settle 
the balances. After taking these offsets into account, the net position of £35.6m liability (2023: £41.9m liability) is presented as 
a deferred tax liability in the Company’s balance sheet. Where deferred tax assets are recognised, the Directors are of the opinion, 
based on recent and forecast trading, that the level of taxable profits in current and future years make it more likely than not that 
these assets will be recovered.
Movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
(41,875)
(24,944)
Movements during the year
6,279
(16,931)
Balance at the end of the year
(35,596)
(41,875)
C.38. Inventories
An analysis of inventories at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Raw materials
38,382
52,193
Work in progress
31,784
35,303
Finished goods
34,672
35,409
Balance at the end of the year
104,838
122,905
C.39. Trade receivables
An analysis of trade receivables at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Trade receivables
50
37
Amounts owed by Group undertakings
48,640
35,638
Balance at the end of the year
48,690
35,675
161
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
C.40. Provisions
Warranty provision movements during the year were:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Balance at the beginning of the year
2,130
3,727
Created in the year
2,473
2,253
Unused amounts reversed
−
(717)
Used in the year
(2,337)
(3,133)
136
(1,597)
Balance at the end of the year
2,266
2,130
The warranty provision has been calculated on the basis of historical return-in-warranty information and other quality reports. 
It is expected that most of this expenditure will be incurred in the next financial year and all expenditure will be incurred within 
three years of the balance sheet date.
C.41. Leases (as lessee)
Lease liabilities are analysed as below:
Year ended 30 June 2024
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Total future minimum lease payments payable
3,799
−
1,154
4,953
Effect of discounting
(1,897)
−
(105)
(2,002)
Lease liability
1,902
−
1,049
2,951
Year ended 30 June 2023
Leasehold
property
£’000
Plant and
equipment
£’000
Motor
vehicles
£’000
Total
£’000
Total future minimum lease payments payable
3,603
−
405
4,008
Effect of discounting
(3,240)
36
1363
(1,841)
Lease liability
363
36
1,768
2,167
C.42. Other payables
An analysis of other payables due within one year at the end of the year was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Amounts owed to Group undertakings
24,274
24,075
Amounts owed to joint ventures
−
–
Other taxes and social security
3,753
3,902
Other creditors and accruals
16,835
19,643
Balance at the end of the year
44,862
47,620
Other creditors and accruals includes £6.0m (2023: £7.0m) relating to performance bonus accruals. 
C.43. Employee benefits
The Company operated a defined benefit pension scheme, which, at 5 April 2007, ceased any future accrual for current members 
and was closed to new members. Employees of the Company now participate in a defined contribution scheme.
The total pension cost of the Company for the year was £20.2m (2023: £18.9m), of which £0.1m (2023: £0.1m) related to Directors. 
The latest full actuarial valuation of the scheme was carried out at 30 September 2021 and updated to 30 June 2024 by a qualified 
independent actuary.
The major assumptions used by the actuary for the scheme are disclosed in Note 23, along with relevant sensitivities.
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
162
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

C.43. Employee benefits continued
The assets and liabilities in the scheme were:
30 June 2024
£’000
% of total
assets
30 June 2023
£’000
% of total
assets
Market value of assets:
  Insurance contract
129,207
93
−
−
  Credit and fixed income funds
9,268
7
54,656
30
  Cash and other
656
−
38,642
21
  Index linked gilts
−
−
53,738
30
  Multi-asset fund
−
−
21,432
12
  Fixed interest gilts
−
−
13,219
7
139,131
100
181,687
100
Actuarial value of liabilities
(130,414)
−
(124,271)
−
Surplus in the scheme
8,717
−
57,416
−
Deferred tax thereon
(2,179)
−
(14,354)
−
During FY2024, the Trustee of the defined benefit pension scheme undertook a buy-in and insured around 99% of the Scheme’s 
liabilities by purchasing an insurance policy. Further detail of the buy-in is contained in Note 23.
The movements in the scheme were:
Year ended 30 June 2024
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Total
£’000
Surplus in scheme at the beginning of the year
181,687
(124,271)
57,416
Interest on pension scheme 
9,124
(6,216)
2,908
Remeasurement gain/(loss) under IAS 19
(45,944)
(4,763)
(50,707)
Scheme administration expenses
(900)
−
(900)
Benefits paid
(4,836)
4,836
−
Surplus in scheme at the end of the year
139,131
(130,414)
8,717
Year ended 30 June 2023
Assets
£’000
Liabilities
£’000
Total
£’000
Surplus in scheme at the beginning of the year
193,862
(153,531)
40,331
Contributions
2,177
−
2,177
Interest on pension scheme 
6,962
(5,443)
1,519
Remeasurement gain/(loss) under IAS 19
(16,432)
30,119
13,687
Scheme administration expenses
(298)
−
(298)
Benefits paid
(4,584)
4,584
−
Surplus in scheme at the end of the year
181,687
(124,271)
57,416
The analysis of the amount recognised in Other comprehensive income and expense was:
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Actuarial gain/(loss) arising from:
  Changes in demographic assumptions
31
1,802
  Changes in financial assumptions
(433)
36,137
  Experience adjustment
(4,361)
(7,820)
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
(45,944)
16,432)
Total recognised in the Other comprehensive income and expense
(50,707)
13,687
163
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
C.44. Share capital
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Allotted, called-up and fully paid 72,788,543 ordinary shares of 20p each
14,558
14,558
The ordinary shares are the only class of share in the Company. Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to vote at general meetings 
of the Company and receive dividends as declared. The Articles of Association of the Company do not contain any restrictions on 
the transfer of shares nor on voting rights.
C.45. Related parties
During the year, related parties, these being the Group’s joint ventures, see Note 13, had the following transactions and balances 
with the Company: 
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
Purchased goods and services from the Company during the year
117
81
Sold goods and services to the Company during the year
2,318
2,138
Amounts owed by the Company at the year end
121
154
Amounts owed to the Company at the year end
49
–
C.46. Capital commitments
Capital commitments at the end of the year, for which no provision has been made in the financial statements, were £26.5m 
(FY2023: £43.7m).
C.47. Subsidiary undertakings 
The following are the subsidiary undertakings of Renishaw plc as at 30 June 2024, all of which are wholly-owned and held by 
a subsidiary undertaking, unless otherwise stated. The country in which each subsidiary has its registered/principal office is its 
domicile and country of incorporation. The accounting year-end for each subsidiary undertaking is 30 June unless otherwise stated. 
The shareholdings in all the subsidiary undertakings are in the ordinary share capital of those undertakings unless otherwise stated. 
The principal activities for all the subsidiary undertakings are those of the Company, as set out in the Other statutory and regulatory 
disclosures, except as indicated below:
D Dormant company	 * 31 March year-end	
	
F Finance company	
^ 31 December year-end
H Holding company	
† Ordinary-A shares	
	
T Travel agency	
	
‡ Ordinary-C shares
Company
Registered Office
Owned by Renishaw plc
MTT Investments LimitedD
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR
United Kingdom
Renishaw Advanced Materials LimitedD
Renishaw International LimitedF
Renishaw Medical LimitedD
Renishaw PT LimitedD
Renishaw Software LimitedD
Renishaw Transducer Systems LimitedD
Renishaw UK Sales Limited
Wotton Travel LimitedT
Measurement Devices LimitedD
Research Park North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP 
United Kingdom
Renishaw Diagnostics Limited†‡ (92.4%)
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR
United Kingdom
Renishaw Tehnicni Inženiring d.o.o.
4th Floor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 
Tržaška cesta 25, Ljubljana, 1000
Slovenia
Renishaw Neuro Solutions Limited
Wotton Road, Charfield, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8SP 
United Kingdom
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
164
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Company
Registered Office
Owned by MTT Investments Limited
MTT Technologies LimitedD
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR
United Kingdom
Owned by Renishaw International Limited
itp GmbH
Rathausstraße 75-79, 66333, Völklingen 
Germany
OOO Renishaw^ (not actively trading)
Kantemirovskaya Ulitsa, 58, 115477, Moskva, 
Russian Federation
Renishaw (Austria) GmbH
Industriestraße 9, Top 4.2, 2353, Guntramsdorf 
Austria
Renishaw (Canada) Limited
2196 Dunwin Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C7 
Canada
Renishaw (Hong Kong) Limited
Ever Gain Plaza Tower 2, 28/F, 88 Container Port Road, Kwai Chung 
Hong Kong
Renishaw (Ireland) DAC
Swords Business Park, Mountgorry, Swords, County Dublin, K67 FX67
Ireland
Renishaw (Israel) Limited
HaTnufa Street 3, Kraytek Building, PO Box 4, Yokne’am Illit, 2069204 
Israel
Renishaw (Korea) Limited
RM#1314, Woolim e-Biz Center, 28 Digital-ro 33-gil, Guro-gu, Seoul
Republic of Korea
Renishaw AB
Biskop Henriks väg 2, 176 76, Järfälla
Sweden
Renishaw AG
Stachelhofstrasse 2, 8854, Siebnen, Schübelbach
Switzerland
Renishaw Benelux BV
Nikkelstraat 3, 4823 AE, Breda
Netherlands
Renishaw GmbH (5.1% owned by Renishaw plc)
Karl-Benz Straße 12, 72124, Pliezhausen
Germany
Renishaw Gulf Measuring & Control Systems 
Trading LLC^
Office 501, 5th Floor, Block B, Business Village, Port Saeed, Deira, Dubai
United Arab Emirates
Renishaw Healthcare, Inc.
c/o C T Corporation System (Chicago), 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 814, 
Cook County, Chicago IL 60604
United States
Renishaw Hungary Kft
Gyár utca 2, Budaörs, 2040
Hungary
Renishaw Ibérica S.A.U.
Gavà Park, Carrer de la Recerca, 7, Gavà, 08850, Barcelona
Spain
Renishaw K.K.
4 Chome-29-8 Yotsuya, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0004
Japan
Renishaw Latino Americana Ltda.^
Calçada dos Cravos, 141, Alphaville Comercial, Barueri, São Paulo, 06453-053
Brazil
Renishaw Metrology Systems Limited*
S.No.283, Hissa no.2, S.No.284, Hissa no.2 & 3A, Raisoni Industrial Estate, 
Village Mann, Taluka Mulshi, Pune, 411057
India
Renishaw México S. de R.L. de C.V.^ 
(0.001% owned by Renishaw, Inc.)
Iridium 5004, Parque Industrial Milenium, Apodoca, Nuevo León, 66600
Mexico
Renishaw Oceania Pty Limited
c/o KPMG, Tower Two, Collins Square, 727 Collins Street, Docklands VIC 3008 
Australia
Renishaw Oy
c/o WaBuCo Oy, Energiakuja 3, Helsinki, 00180
Finland
Renishaw S.A.S.
15 Rue Albert Einstein, 77420, Champs-sur-Marne
France
Renishaw S.p.A.
Via dei Prati 5, 10044 Pianezza, Torino
Italy
C.47. Subsidiary undertakings continued
165
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial statements
Company
Registered Office
Renishaw s.r.o.
Olomoucká 1164/85, Brno-Černovice, Brno, 627 00
Czech Republic
Renishaw Sp. z o.o.
ul. Osmańska 12, 02-823, Warszawa
Poland
Renishaw SRL 
(0.1% owned by Renishaw UK Sales Limited)
Section A.2.13, 2nd Floor, Building A, Central Business Park, 
Calea Șerban Vodă 133, București, 040205
Romania
Renishaw Teknoloji Çözümleri LŞ
Turgut Özal Blv. No:193, Şerifali Mahallesi, Dudullu Osb, Ümraniye, İstanbul, 34775
Turkey
Renishaw US Holdings, Inc.H
c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street - Corporation Trust 
Center, New Castle County, Wilmington DE 19801
United States
Renishaw, Inc.
c/o C T Corporation System (Chicago), 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 814, 
Cook County, Chicago IL 60604
United States
Owned by Renishaw (Hong Kong) Limited
Renishaw (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Upper Penthouse, Wisma RKT, 2, Jalan Raja Abdullah, Chow Kit, 50300 
Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan
Malaysia
Renishaw (Shanghai) Management Company 
Limited^
288 Jiang Chang San Lu, Zhabei Qu, Shanghai, 20436
China
Renishaw (Shanghai) Trading Company Limited^
286 Jiang Chang San Lu, Zhabei Qu, Shanghai, 20436
China
Renishaw (Singapore) PTE Limited
988 Toa Payoh North, #06-07/08, 319002
Singapore
Renishaw (Taiwan) Inc
2F. No. 2, Jingke 7th Road, Nantun District, Taichung, 40852
Taiwan
Owned by Renishaw US Holdings, Inc.
Renishaw Fixturing Solutions, LLC
c/o The Corporation Company, 40600 Ann Arbor Road East, 
Suite 201, Plymouth, MI, 48170
United States
Renishaw Properties, Inc.
c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street – Corporation Trust 
Center, New Castle County, Wilmington DE 19801
United States
Owned by Renishaw (Ireland) DAC
Renishaw Mayfield SA
Stachelhofstrasse 2, 8854, Siebnen, Schübelbach
Switzerland
Owned by Renishaw Medical Limited
Renishaw Medical AM Solutions LimitedD
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR
United Kingdom
Owned by Renishaw Neuro Solutions Limited
Renishaw Mayfield SARL
31 Rue Ampère, 69680, Chassieu
France
C.48. Joint ventures
The following are the joint ventures of Renishaw plc at 30 June 2024. The country in which each entity has its registered/principal 
office is its domicile and country of incorporation. The accounting year-end for each joint venture is 30 June unless otherwise stated. 
The shareholdings are in the ordinary share capital of those undertakings unless otherwise stated. The principal activities for the 
joint ventures are those of the Company, as set out in the Other statutory and regulatory disclosures.
Company
Registered Office
Owned by Renishaw plc
Metrology Software Products Limited (70%)
6F Greensfield Court, Alnwick, Northumberland, NE66 2DE
United Kingdom
Owned by Renishaw International Limited
RLS Merilna tehnika d.o.o. (50%)
Poslovna cona Žeje pri Komendi, Pod vrbami 2, Komenda, 1218 Slovenia
C.47. Subsidiary undertakings continued
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
166
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Results
note 
2024
£’000
note 
2023
£’000
note 
2022
£’000
note 
2021
£’000
note 
2020
£’000
note 
2019
£’000
note 
2018
£’000
note 
2017
£’000
note 
2016
£’000
2015
£’000
Overseas revenue
653,345
649,674
639,540
538,636
482,784
539,915
580,940
509,212
404,472
469,221
UK and Ireland revenue
37,956
38,899
31,536
26,923
27,431
34,044
30,567
27,595
22,752
25,499
Total revenue
691,301
688,573
671,076
565,559
510,215
573,959
611,507
536,807
427,224
494,720
Adjusted operating profit
108,667
130,407
161,406
118,568
51,700
93,711
143,045
108,733
86,952
143,924
Adjusted profit before tax
122,594
140,983
163,742
119,666
48,614
103,862
145,081
109,079
87,475
144,196
Taxation (excluding 
adjusted items)
25,705
28,126
28,685
23,611
11,547
16,557
20,942
12,819
14,880
22,850
Profit for the year 
(excluding adjusted items 
and tax on adjusted items)
96,889
112,857
135,057
96,055
37,067
87,305
124,139
96,260
72,595
121,346
Capital employed
2024
£’000
2023
£’000
2022
£’000
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
2019
£’000
2018
£’000
2017
£’000
2016
£’000
2015
£’000
Share capital
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
14,558
Share premium
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Reserves
888,221
882,058
800,570
688,730
532,264
568,677
533,994
429,214
366,785
413,918
Total equity
902,821
896,658
815,170
703,330
546,864
583,277
548,594
443,814
381,385
428,518
Statistics
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Overseas revenue 
as a percentage of 
total revenue
94.5%
94.4%
95.3%
95.2%
94.6%
94.1%
95.0%
94.9%
94.7%
94.8%
Adjusted earnings 
per share 
133.2p
155.1p
185.5p
132.0p
51.0p
119.9p
170.5p
132.4p
100.4p
167.5p
Proposed dividend 
76.2p
76.2p
72.6p
66.0p
0.0p
60.0p
60.0p
52.0p
48.0p
46.5p
Note
The results and adjusted earnings per share for the years 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 exclude certain items. These were: 
−	 2016 (£25.8m pre tax loss), 2017 (£8.0m pre tax gain), 2018 (£10.1m pre tax gain), 2019 (£6.1m pre tax gain), 2020 (£21.6m pre tax loss), 
2021 (£23.0m pre tax gain) and 2022 (£8.3m pre-tax loss) and 2023 (£5.5m pre-tax gain) gains and losses from financial instruments not effective for cash 
flow hedging; 
No years prior to 2016 have been adjusted for gains and/or losses from financial instruments not effective for cash flow hedging.
−	 2020 (£23.8m loss), 2022 (£1.7m gain) and 2023 (£0.7m) restructuring costs; 
−	 2021 (£3.2m loss) and 2022 (£0.2m gain) third-party FSP costs; 
−	 2022 (£11.7m loss) UK defined benefit pension scheme past service cost; 
−	 2023 (£2.1m loss) US defined benefit pension scheme past service cost. 
10-year financial record
167
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Financial statements
AGM
Annual General Meeting
AM
additive manufacturing (3D printing)
APAC
Asia Pacific
APM(s)
alternative performance measure(s)
ASIC
Application-specific integrated circuit
Governance 
Code
UK Corporate Governance Code 2018
CO2e
carbon dioxide equivalent
Company 
Renishaw plc
CMM
co-ordinate measuring machine 
CNC
computer numerically controlled
CPI 
consumer price index
DESNZ
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
DTR
the FCA’s Disclosure Guidance and 
Transparency Rules
EBT
Employee Benefit Trust
EDI
equality, diversity and inclusion 
EMEA
Europe, Middle East and Africa
EPS
earnings per share
ERP
enterprise resource planning 
ESG
Environment, social and governance
EU
European Union
EUR
Euro
EV
electric vehicle
EY
Ernst & Young LLP
FCA
Financial Conduct Authority 
FRC
Financial Reporting Council
FSP
formal sale process
FX
foreign exchange 
GBP
Great British Pound or Pound Sterling
GHG
greenhouse gas
GMP
Guaranteed minimum pension 
Group
Renishaw plc and its subsidiaries 
H&S 
health and safety 
HKD
Hong Kong Dollar
HQ 
headquarters 
HR
human resources
ICE
internal combustion engine 
IFRIC
International Financial Reporting Interpretations 
Committee
IFRS
International Financial Reporting Standards
IP
intellectual property
IPCC
International Panel on Climate Change 
JPY
Japanese Yen
Glossary
KPI(s)
key performance indicator(s)
kW
kilowatt – an amount of power equal to 1,000 watts 
kWh
Kilowatt hour – an amount of energy equivalent 
to delivering 1kW of power for an hour 
M&A
mergers and acquisitions 
MRP
Material Requirements Planning
NCI
non-controlling interest
OCI
other comprehensive income 
OEM
original equipment manufacturer
P&L 
profit and loss account
PBT
profit before tax
RIS
Regulatory Information Service
R&D 
research and development 
RIDDOR
Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous 
Occurrences Regulations 2013
SBTi
Science Based Targets initiative 
Scope 1 
direct GHG emissions occur from sources that 
are owned or controlled by the company. For 
example, emissions from combustion in owned 
or controlled boilers, generators, vehicles, etc. 
Scope 2 
GHG emissions from the generation of 
purchased electricity consumed by the Company 
Scope 3 
Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of 
the activities of the Company, but that occur from 
sources not owned or controlled by the Company 
SEEG
stereoelectroencephalography
SEM
Scanning electron microscopy
SME 
small and medium-sized enterprise 
STEM
science, technology, engineering and 
mathematics
tCO2e
Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent 
TCFD
Task Force on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures
TPR
The Pensions Regulator
TSR
Total shareholder return, calculated as change 
in share price, assuming dividends are 
immediately reinvested
UAE
United Arab Emirates
ULEV
ultra-low emission vehicle
UK
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland
UKLR
The FCA’s UK Listing Rules
UN SDG
United Nations Sustainable Development Goal
USA
United States of America
USD
Unites States Dollar
Trademarks
The following registered and unregistered trademarks, which are owned by Renishaw plc and its subsidiaries, appear throughout 
this Annual Report.
AGILITY®
CARTO™
Equator™
FORTiS™
inLux™
MODUS™
neuromate®
RenAM®
REVO®
TEMPUS™
Virsa™
168
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Ordinary shares
The Company has one class of ordinary 20p shares listed on 
the London Stock Exchange under code RSW, ISIN number 
GB0007323586.
Registrars
For all enquiries about shareholders’ holdings, transfer and 
registration of shares, and changes of name and address, 
contact the Company’s registrars, Equiniti Limited:
Equiniti
Aspect House
Spencer Road
Lancing
West Sussex
BN99 6DA
Telephone: +44 (0)371 384 2169
Website: www.shareview.co.uk
Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate. Calls outside 
the UK will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines 
are open from 8:30am to 5:30pm (UK time), Monday to Friday 
(excluding English and Welsh public holidays).
AGM
Our 2024 AGM will be held on Wednesday 27 November 
2024 at our headquarters at New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, 
Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR at 10am. Further details can be found 
in the Notice of Meeting, which is set out in a separate circular 
to shareholders. Shareholders holding shares in the Company 
through a nominee service should arrange to be appointed 
as a corporate representative or a proxy in respect of their 
shareholding in order to attend and vote at the meeting.
Financial reports
The Annual Report and copies of previous financial reports are 
available at www.renishaw.com/investor. The half-year results 
and the preliminary announcement of the full-year results are 
published on our website promptly after they have been 
released through a Regulatory Information Service.
Electronic communications
All shareholder communications, including the Company’s 
Annual Report, are made available on the Renishaw website, 
and you may opt to receive email notifications informing you 
when shareholder communications are available to view and 
download rather than receiving paper copies through the post. 
Receiving communications electronically provides certain 
advantages to shareholders and Renishaw, including accessing 
documents more quickly, reducing our environmental impact 
and reducing the cost of printing and delivery of documents. 
If you would like to sign up for this service, visit Equiniti’s 
Shareview Portfolio website. You may change the way you 
receive communications at any time by contacting Equiniti.
Dividend mandate
Shareholders can arrange to have their dividends paid directly 
into their bank or building society account by completing a bank 
mandate form. This is the most secure and efficient method of 
payment. A mandate form can be obtained from Equiniti or you 
will find one on your last dividend confirmation.
Shareholder information
Financial calendar
Annual General Meeting
27 November 2024
Half year
31 December 2024
Half-year results
February 2025
Trading update
May 2025
Final dividend
Ex-div date 31 October 2024
Record date 1 November 2024
Payment date 5 December 2024
Interim dividend (provisional)
Ex-div date 6 March 2025
Record date 7 March 2025
Payment date 8 April 2025 
Registration details and Company Secretary
Group General Counsel & Company Secretary
Kasim Hussain
Registered office
New Mills
Wotton-under-Edge
Gloucestershire
GL12 8JR
Telephone: +44 (0)1453 524524
Email: companysecretary@renishaw.com
Website: www.renishaw.com/investor
Registered number
01106260 (England and Wales)
Auditor and corporate advisers
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Solicitors
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
Corporate brokers
UBS
Peel Hunt
Principal bankers
Lloyds Bank
BNP Paribas
HSBC
169
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Financial statements
Shareholder profile
Shareholdings
%
1
1 – 5,000
1.07
2
5,001 – 25,000
1.97
3
25,001 – 50,000
2.18
4
50,001 – 100,000
3.90
5
100,001 – 500,000
16.78
6
500,001 – 1,000,000
6.22
7
1,000,001 – 3,000,000
12.47
8
more than 3,000,000
55.41
Shareholdings
%
1
Directors
52.85
2
Individuals
0.94
3
Institutions
46.21
Shareholder information continued
Share fraud
We are aware some of our shareholders have received 
unsolicited calls or correspondence, offering to buy or sell 
their shares for a price in excess of the current market price. 
The callers can be very persuasive and extremely persistent 
and often have professional websites and telephone numbers 
to support their activities. These callers will sometimes imply 
a connection to Renishaw and provide incorrect or misleading 
information. Please be aware this is likely to be a scam – the 
safest thing to do is hang up.
You are advised to be wary of unsolicited advice or offers 
to buy shares. 
See www.fca.org.uk/consumers/protect-yourself-scams 
for further advice.
Find out more or report suspected fraud to the FCA on 
their consumer helpline 0800 111 6768 (overseas callers dial 
+44 207 066 1000) or using the share fraud reporting form 
available at www.fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam.
If you have already paid money to share fraudsters contact 
Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 (overseas callers dial 
+44 300 123 2040) or their online fraud reporting tool at 
www.actionfraud.police.uk/reporting-fraud-and-cyber-crime.
Cautionary note and safe harbour: this Annual Report has 
been prepared for the purpose of assisting the Company’s 
shareholders to assess the strategies adopted by the 
Company and the potential for those strategies to succeed 
and no one, including the Company’s shareholders, may rely 
on it for any other purpose.
This Annual Report has been prepared on the basis of the 
knowledge and information available to the Directors at the 
time. Given the nature of some forward-looking information, 
which has been given in good faith, the Company’s 
shareholders should treat this information with due caution.
1234
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
170
Renishaw plc Annual Report 2024

Design, editing and production by falconwindsor.com
Printed at Pureprint Group, ISO 14001. FSC® certified and CarbonNeutral®.
This document is printed on Revive 100% Recycled Silk. These papers have been exclusively supplied 
by Denmaur Independent Papers, which has offset the carbon produced by the production and delivery 
of them to the printer.
These papers are 100% recycled and manufactured using de-inked post-consumer waste. All the pulp is 
bleached using an elemental chlorine free process (ECF). Printed in the UK by Pureprint using its pureprint® 
environmental printing technology. Vegetable inks were used throughout. Pureprint is a CarbonNeutral® 
company. Both the manufacturing mill and the printer are registered to the Environmental Management 
System ISO 14001 and are Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC®) chain-of-custody certified.
If you have finished with this document and no longer wish to retain it, please pass it on to other interested 
readers or dispose of it in your recycled paper waste. Thank you.

Renishaw plc
New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge,
Gloucestershire GL12 8JR
United Kingdom
T: +44 (0) 1453 524524
F: +44 (0) 1453 524401
E: uk@renishaw.com
For more information visit:
www.renishaw.com