Quarterlytics / Real Estate / REIT - Retail / Retail Opportunity Investments

Retail Opportunity Investments

roic · NASDAQ Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker roic
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Real Estate
Industry REIT - Retail
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2022 Annual Report · Retail Opportunity Investments
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from           to         

or

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Commission file number:  001-33749

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Commission file number:  333-189057-01

Maryland
Delaware

(Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)
(Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

26-0500600
94-2969738

(Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)
(Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

11250 El Camino Real
San Diego, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

92130
(Zip Code)

(858) 677-0900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.                                    None
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP                    None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Yes ☒ No ☐
Yes ☐ No ☒

Yes ☐ No ☒
Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Yes ☒ No ☐
Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Yes ☒ No ☐
Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-accelerated  filer,  a  smaller  reporting  company,  or
emerging  growth  company.    See  the  definitions  of  “large  accelerated  filer,”  “accelerated  filer,”  “smaller  reporting  company”  and  “emerging  growth
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
☒

Large accelerated filer
Emerging growth company

☐

Accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Non-accelerated filer

☐

☐

☐

☐

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Large accelerated filer
Emerging growth company

☐

☐

Accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Non-accelerated filer

☐

☒

☐

☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control
over  financial  reporting  under  Section  404(b)  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  (15  U.S.C.  7262(b))  by  the  registered  public  accounting  firm  that  prepared  or
issued its audit report.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

☒
☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the
filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

☐
☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received
by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1 (b).
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

☐
☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a Shell Company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Yes ☐ No ☒
Yes ☐ No ☒

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Name of Registrant

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.0001
per share
None

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on
which registered

ROIC
None

NASDAQ
None

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. as of June 30, 2022, the last business day
of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $1.9 billion (based on the closing sale price of $15.78 per share of Retail Opportunity Investments
Corp. common stock on that date as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market).

There is no public trading market for the operating partnership units of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP. As a result the aggregate market
value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of this registrant cannot be determined.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 124,609,914 shares of common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. outstanding as of February 9, 2023.

Portions of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting, to be filed within 120 days after its fiscal year,
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXPLANATORY PARAGRAPH

This  report  combines  the  annual  reports  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  a  Maryland
corporation (“ROIC”), and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) of which Retail
Opportunity  Investments  Corp.  is  the  parent  company  and  through  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary,  acts  as  general  partner.  Unless  otherwise  indicated  or
unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company” refer to ROIC together with its
consolidated subsidiaries, including Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all
references in this report to the Operating Partnership refer to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

ROIC operates as a real estate investment trust and as of December 31, 2022, ROIC owned an approximate 93.6% partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership. Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, ROIC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Through
this subsidiary, ROIC has full and complete authority and control over the Operating Partnership’s business.

The  Company  believes  that  combining  the  annual  reports  on  Form  10-K  of  ROIC  and  the  Operating  Partnership  into  a  single  report  will  result  in  the
following benefits:

• facilitate a better understanding by the investors of ROIC and the Operating Partnership by enabling them to view the business as a whole in the
same manner as management views and operates the business;

• remove  duplicative  disclosures  and  provide  a  more  straightforward  presentation  in  light  of  the  fact  that  a  substantial  portion  of  the  disclosure
applies to both ROIC and the Operating Partnership; and

• create time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates ROIC and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of ROIC and the Operating Partnership are the same.

There are few differences between ROIC and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosures in this report. The Company believes it is
important  to  understand  the  differences  between  ROIC  and  the  Operating  Partnership  in  the  context  of  how  these  entities  operate  as  an  interrelated
consolidated company. ROIC is a real estate investment trust, whose only material assets are its direct or indirect partnership interests in the Operating
Partnership  and  membership  interest  in  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  GP,  LLC,  which  is  the  sole  general  partner  of  the  Operating  Partnership.  As  a
result, ROIC does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the parent company and through Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership GP, LLC as
the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and directly or indirectly
holds  the  ownership  interests  in  the  Company’s  real  estate  ventures.  The  Company  conducts  its  business  through  the  Operating  Partnership,  which  is
structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by ROIC, which are contributed to the Operating
Partnership,  the  Operating  Partnership  generates  the  capital  required  by  the  Company’s  business  through  the  Operating  Partnership’s  operations,  by  the
Operating Partnership’s incurrence of indebtedness (directly and through subsidiaries) or through the issuance of operating partnership units (“OP Units”)
of the Operating Partnership.

Non-controlling interests is the primary difference between the Consolidated Financial Statements for ROIC and the Operating Partnership. The OP Units
in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by ROIC are accounted for as partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements and as
non-controlling  interests  in  ROIC’s  financial  statements.  Accordingly,  this  report  presents  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for  ROIC  and  the
Operating Partnership separately, as required, as well as Earnings Per Share / Earnings Per Unit and Capital of the Partnership.

This  report  also  includes  separate  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations  –  Liquidity  and  Capital
Resources, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications for each of ROIC and
the Operating Partnership as reflected in Exhibits 31 and 32.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

PART II

Item 5.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.

PART III

Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.

PART IV

Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule

SIGNATURES

3

Page
6
6
13
29
29
34
34
34
34
36
49
50
92
92
93
93
93
93
94
94
94
94
94
94
99

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information

When  used  in  this  discussion  and  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K,  the  words  “believes,”  “anticipates,”  “projects,”  “may,”  “will,”
“should,”  “estimates,”  “expects,”  and  similar  expressions  are  intended  to  identify  forward-looking  statements  with  the  meaning  of  that  term  in
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and in Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”).

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results or
outcomes to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Currently, one of the factors that could cause actual outcomes to
differ materially from the Company’s forward-looking statements is the ongoing adverse effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, and federal, state, and/or local
regulatory  guidelines  and  private  business  actions  to  control  it,  on  the  Company’s  financial  condition,  operating  results  and  cash  flows,  the  Company’s
tenants and their customers, the use of and demand for retail space, the real estate market in which the Company operates, the U.S. economy, the global
economy and the financial markets. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic, including any variants thereof, continues to impact the Company and its
tenants will depend on future developments, which remain uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. Additional factors, many of which may be
influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements include:

Actual results may differ materially due to uncertainties including:

• the Company’s ability to identify and acquire retail real estate that meet its investment standards in its markets;

• the level of rental revenue the Company achieves from its assets;

• the market value of the Company’s assets and the supply of, and demand for, the retail real estate in which it invests;

• the state of the U.S. economy generally, or in specific geographic regions;

• the impact of economic conditions on the Company’s business;

• the conditions in the local markets in which the Company operates and its concentration in those markets, as well as changes in national economic

and market conditions; 

• consumer spending and confidence trends;

• the Company’s ability to enter into new leases or to renew leases with existing tenants at the properties it owns or acquires at favorable rates;

• the Company’s ability to anticipate changes in consumer buying practices and the space needs of tenants;

• the competitive landscape impacting the properties the Company owns or acquires and their tenants;

• the Company’s relationships with its tenants and their financial condition and liquidity;

• ROIC’s ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax (a “REIT”);

• the  Company’s  use  of  debt  as  part  of  its  financing  strategy  and  its  ability  to  make  payments  or  to  comply  with  any  covenants  under  its  senior

unsecured notes, its unsecured credit facilities or other debt facilities it currently has or subsequently obtains;

• the Company’s level of operating expenses, including amounts it is required to pay to its management team;

• changes  in  interest  rates  or  the  Company’s  credit  ratings  that  could  impact  the  market  price  of  ROIC’s  common  stock  and  the  cost  of  the

Company’s borrowings;

• legislative and regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs).

4

 
 
Forward-looking statements are based on estimates as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company disclaims any obligation to publicly
release  the  results  of  any  revisions  to  these  forward-looking  statements  reflecting  new  estimates,  events  or  circumstances  after  the  date  of  this  Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

The  risks  included  here  are  not  exhaustive.  Other  sections  of  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K,  including  but  not  limited  to  “Risk  Factors,”  and  other
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, may include additional factors that could adversely affect the Company’s
business and financial performance. Moreover, the Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge
from  time  to  time  and  it  is  not  possible  for  management  to  predict  all  such  risk  factors,  nor  can  it  assess  the  impact  of  all  such  risk  factors  on  the
Company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of
actual results.

RISK FACTORY SUMMARY

An investment in the Company’s securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks summarized in Item 1A, “Risk

Factors” included in this report. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to the Company’s Business and Operations

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

There are risks relating to investments in real estate.

The Company operates in a highly competitive market and competition may limit its ability to acquire desirable assets and to attract and retain
tenants.

The Company may change any of its strategies, policies or procedures without stockholder consent, which could materially and adversely affect its
business.

Capital  markets  and  economic  conditions  can  materially  affect  the  Company’s  financial  condition,  its  results  of  operations  and  the  value  of  its
assets.

Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease the Company’s revenues and available cash.

Real estate investments’ value and income fluctuate due to conditions in the general economy and the real estate business, which may materially
and adversely affect the Company’s ability to service its debt and expenses.

Factors affecting the general retail environment could adversely affect the financial condition of the Company’s retail tenants and the willingness
of retailers to lease space in its shopping centers, and in turn, materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Company does not have a formal policy limiting the amount of debt it may incur and its board of directors may change its leverage policy
without stockholder consent, which could result in a different risk profile.

• A  prolonged  economic  slowdown,  a  lengthy  or  severe  recession  or  declining  real  estate  values  could  impair  the  Company’s  assets  and  have  a
material and adverse effect on its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations,
the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

•

The Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition have been and in the future may be adversely impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic or a future public health crisis.

Risks Related to Financing

•

•

The Company’s term loan, credit facility and unsecured senior notes contain restrictive covenants relating to its operations, which could limit the
Company’s ability to respond to changing market conditions and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

Certain of the Company’s mortgage financing arrangements and other indebtedness contain provisions that could limit the Company’s operating
flexibility.

5

 
•

•

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of the Company’s debt payments and materially and adversely affect its business, financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Financing arrangements that the Company may use to finance its assets may require it to provide additional collateral or pay down debt.

Risks Related to the Company’s Organization and Structure

•

•

•

•

The Company depends on dividends and distributions from its direct and indirect subsidiaries. The creditors of these subsidiaries are entitled to
amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or distributions to the Company.

The  Company’s  failure  to  qualify  as  a  REIT  would  subject  it  to  U.S.  federal  income  tax  and  potentially  increased  state  and  local  taxes,  which
would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to its stockholders.

To maintain its REIT qualification, the Company may be forced to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions.

The Company cannot assure you of its ability to pay distributions in the future.

PART I

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise, all references to “the Company,” “we,” “us,”

“our,” or “our company” refer to ROIC together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.

Item 1.  Business

Overview

Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  a  Maryland  corporation  (“ROIC”)  commenced  operations  in  October  2009  as  a  fully  integrated,  self-managed
REIT. The Company specializes in the acquisition, ownership and management of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the
west coast of the United States, anchored by supermarkets and drugstores. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 94 properties
(93  retail  and  one  office)  totaling  approximately  10.6  million  square  feet  of  gross  leasable  area  (“GLA”).  The  Company  is  organized  in  a  traditional
umbrella  partnership  real  estate  investment  trust  (“UpREIT”)  format  pursuant  to  which  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  GP,  LLC,  its  wholly-owned
subsidiary, serves as the sole general partner of, and ROIC conducts substantially all of its business through, its operating partnership, Retail Opportunity
Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), together with its subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2022, ROIC
owned an approximate 93.6% partnership interest and other limited partners owned the remaining 6.4% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership.

ROIC’s  only  material  assets  are  its  direct  or  indirect  partnership  interests  in  the  Operating  Partnership  and  membership  interest  in  Retail  Opportunity
Investments GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As a result, ROIC does not conduct business itself, other than acting
as  the  parent  company  and  through  this  subsidiary,  acts  as  the  sole  general  partner  of  the  Operating  Partnership.  The  Operating  Partnership  holds
substantially all the assets of the Company and directly or indirectly holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating
Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds
from  equity  issuances  by  ROIC,  which  are  contributed  to  the  Operating  Partnership,  the  Operating  Partnership  generates  the  capital  required  by  the
Company’s  business  through  the  Operating  Partnership’s  operations,  by  the  Operating  Partnership’s  incurrence  of  indebtedness  (directly  and  through
subsidiaries) or through the issuance of operating partnership units (“OP Units”) of the Operating Partnership.

Investment Strategy

The Company seeks to acquire shopping centers located in densely populated, supply-constrained metropolitan markets on the west coast of the United
States, which exhibit income and population growth and high barriers to entry. The Company’s senior management team has operated in the Company’s
markets for over 30 years and has established an extensive network of relationships in these markets with key institutional and private property owners,
brokers and financial institutions and other

6

 
 
 
real estate operators. The Company’s in-depth local and regional market knowledge and expertise provides a distinct competitive advantage in identifying
and accessing attractive acquisition opportunities, including properties that are not widely marketed.

The  Company  seeks  to  acquire  high  quality,  necessity-based  community  and  neighborhood  shopping  centers  anchored  by  national  and  regional
supermarkets  and  drugstores  that  are  well-leased,  with  stable  cash  flows.  Additionally,  the  Company  acquires  shopping  centers  which  it  believes  are
candidates  for  attractive  near-term  re-tenanting  or  present  other  value-enhancement  opportunities.  Upon  acquiring  a  shopping  center,  the  Company
normally commences leasing initiatives aimed at enhancing long-term value through re-leasing below-market space and improving the tenant mix.

The Company derives revenues primarily from rents and reimbursement payments received from tenants under leases at the Company’s properties. The
Company focuses on leasing to retailers that provide necessity-based, non-discretionary goods and services, catering to the basic and daily needs of the
surrounding  community,  a  majority  of  which  are  destination-based  and  therefore  more  resistant  to  competition  from  e-commerce  than  other  types  of
retailers.  The  Company  believes  necessity-based  retailers  draw  consistent,  regular  traffic  to  its  shopping  centers,  which  results  in  stronger  sales  for  its
tenants and a more consistent revenue base. Additionally, the Company seeks to maintain a strong and diverse tenant base with a balance of large, long-
term leases to major national and regional retailers, including supermarkets, drugstores and discount stores, with small, shorter-term leases to a broad mix
of national, regional and local retailers. The Company believes the long-term anchor tenants provide a reliable, stable base of rental revenue, while the
shorter-term leases afford the Company the opportunity to drive rental growth, as well as the ongoing flexibility to adapt to evolving consumer trends.

The  Company  believes  that  the  current  market  environment  continues  to  present  opportunities  for  it  to  further  build  its  portfolio  and  add  additional
necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers that meet its investment profile. The Company’s long-term objective is to prudently build
and maintain a diverse portfolio of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers aimed at providing stockholders with sustainable, long-
term growth and value through all economic cycles.

In implementing its investment strategy and selecting an asset for acquisition, the Company analyzes the fundamental qualities of the asset, the inherent
strengths and weaknesses of its market, sub-market drivers and trends, and potential risks and risk mitigants facing the property. The Company believes
that its acquisition process and operational expertise provide it with the capability to identify and properly underwrite investment opportunities.

The Company’s aim is to seek to provide diversification of assets, tenant exposures, lease terms and locations in its portfolio. In order to capitalize on the
changing  sets  of  investment  opportunities  that  may  be  present  in  the  various  points  of  an  economic  cycle,  the  Company  may  expand  or  refocus  its
investment strategy. The Company’s investment strategy may be amended from time to time, if approved by its board of directors. The Company is not
required to seek stockholder approval when amending its investment strategy.

Transactions During 2022

Investing Activities

Property Asset Acquisitions

On April 1, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Olympia Square North, located in Olympia, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan
area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of  approximately  $18.4  million.  Olympia  Square  North  is  approximately  90,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by
Albertsons Supermarket. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

On April 1, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Powell Valley Junction, located in Gresham, Oregon, within the Portland metropolitan
area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of  approximately  $17.7  million.  Powell  Valley  Junction  is  approximately  109,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by
Walmart Neighborhood Market. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

On May 17, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Village Oaks Shopping Center, located in Martinez, California, within the San Francisco
metropolitan area, for an adjusted purchase price of approximately $24.1 million. Village Oaks Shopping Center is approximately 80,000 square feet and is
anchored by Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

7

 
 
On August 19, 2022, the Company acquired two properties known as Ballinger Village, located in Shoreline, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan
area,  and  Thomas  Lake  Shopping  Center  located  in  Mill  Creek,  Washington,  within  the  Seattle  metropolitan  area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of
approximately  $29.3  million  and  $31.1  million,  respectively.  Ballinger  Village  is  approximately  111,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by  Thriftway
Supermarket and Rite Aid Pharmacy. Thomas Lake Shopping Center is approximately 111,000 square feet and is anchored by Albertsons Supermarket and
Rite Aid Pharmacy. These properties were acquired by the Company using proceeds from the sale of one of its shopping centers, discussed below, as well
as cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

Property Asset Dispositions

On  August  19,  2022,  in  connection  with  the  acquisitions  of  Ballinger  Village  and  Thomas  Lake  Shopping  Center  discussed  above,  the  Company  sold
Aurora  Square,  a  shopping  center  located  in  Shoreline,  Washington.  The  sales  price  of  $36.2  million,  less  costs  to  sell,  resulted  in  net  proceeds  of
approximately $34.4 million. The Company recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $7.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022
related to this property disposition.

Financing Activities

The Company employs prudent amounts of leverage and uses debt as a means of providing funds for the acquisition of its properties and the diversification
of its portfolio. The Company seeks to primarily utilize unsecured debt in order to maintain liquidity and flexibility in its capital structure.

Term Loan and Credit Facility

The Operating Partnership has an unsecured term loan (the “term loan”) with several banks under which the lenders agreed to provide a $300.0 million
unsecured term loan facility. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership entered into the First Amendment to First Amended and Restated
Term Loan Agreement (as amended, the “Term Loan Agreement”) pursuant to which the maturity date of the term loan was extended from September 8,
2022 to January 20, 2025, without further options for extension. The Term Loan Agreement also provides that the Operating Partnership may from time to
time request increased aggregate commitments of $200.0 million under certain conditions set forth in the Term Loan Agreement, including the consent of
the lenders for the additional commitments. Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal
to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) a London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate determined
by reference to the cost of funds for U.S. dollar deposits for the relevant period (the “Eurodollar Rate”), or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the
highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by the Administrative Agent as its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar
Rate plus 1.00%.

The Operating Partnership has an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “credit facility”) with several banks. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating
Partnership entered into the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Facility Agreement”) pursuant
to which the borrowing capacity under the credit facility is $600.0 million and the maturity date of the credit facility was extended from September 8, 2021
to February 20, 2024, with two six-month extension options, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions
including the payment of extension fees. Additionally, the Credit Facility Agreement contains an accordion feature, which allows the Operating Partnership
to increase the borrowing capacity under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $1.2 billion, subject to lender consents and other conditions. Borrowings
under the Credit Facility Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level
of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) the Eurodollar Rate, or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus
0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank, National Association as its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 0.90%. Additionally, the
Operating Partnership is obligated to pay a facility fee at a rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, currently 0.20%, and a fronting fee at a rate
of  0.125%  per  year  with  respect  to  each  letter  of  credit  issued  under  the  Credit  Facility  Agreement,  of  which  the  Operating  Partnership  had  none
outstanding  as  of  December  31,  2022.  The  Company  has  investment  grade  credit  ratings  from  Moody’s  Investors  Service  (Baa2),  S&P  Global  Ratings
(BBB-) and Fitch Ratings (BBB).

The  Operating  Partnership’s  debt  agreements  contain  customary  representations,  financial  and  other  covenants,  and  its  ability  to  borrow  under  these
agreements is subject to its compliance with financial covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis. The Company was in compliance with such
covenants at December 31, 2022.

8

 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2022, $300.0 million and $88.0 million were outstanding under the term loan and credit facility, respectively. The weighted average
interest rates on the term loan and the credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2022 were 2.7% and 3.1%, respectively. As discussed in Note 11
of the accompanying financial statements, the Company has historically used interest rate swaps to help manage its interest rate risk. The Company’s four
interest rate swaps matured effective August 31, 2022, and accordingly the interest rate on the term loan was no longer effectively fixed and outstanding
borrowings under the term loan became subject to a variable interest rate, as detailed above, effective September 1, 2022. The Company had no available
borrowings under the term loan at December 31, 2022. The Company had $512.0 million available to borrow under the credit facility at December 31,
2022.

Mortgage Notes Payable

On  March  1,  2022,  the  Company  repaid  in  full  the  mortgage  note  related  to  Casitas  Plaza  Shopping  Center  for  a  total  of  approximately  $6.6  million,
without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note. Additionally, on March 31, 2022, the Company repaid in full the mortgage note
related to Riverstone Marketplace for a total of approximately $16.7 million without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note.

ATM Equity Offering

On February 20, 2020, ROIC entered into an “at the market” sales agreement, as amended on April 27, 2022 (the “Sales Agreement”), with each of (i)
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BTIG, LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Regions Securities LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “Agents”) and (ii) the Forward Purchasers (as defined below), pursuant to which ROIC may sell, from time
to time, shares (any such shares, the “Primary Shares”) of ROIC’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), to or through the Agents
and instruct certain of the Agents, acting as forward sellers (the “Forward Sellers”), to offer and sell borrowed shares (any such shares, “Forward Hedge
Shares,” and collectively with the Primary Shares, the “Shares”) with the Shares to be sold under the Sales Agreement having an aggregate offering price of
up to $500.0 million.

The Sales Agreement contemplates that, in addition to the issuance and sale of Primary Shares to or through the Agents as principal or its sales agents,
ROIC may enter into separate forward sale agreements with any of KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC or their
respective affiliates (in such capacity, the “Forward Purchasers”). If ROIC enters into a forward sale agreement with any Forward Purchaser, ROIC expects
that such Forward Purchaser or its affiliate will borrow from third parties and, through the relevant Forward Seller, sell a number of Forward Hedge Shares
equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward sale agreement, in accordance with the mutually accepted instructions
related to such forward sale agreement. ROIC will not initially receive any proceeds from any sale of Forward Hedge Shares through a Forward Seller.
ROIC  expects  to  fully  physically  settle  each  particular  forward  sale  agreement  with  the  relevant  Forward  Purchaser  on  one  or  more  dates  specified  by
ROIC on or prior to the maturity date of that particular forward sale agreement by issuing shares of Common Stock (the “Confirmation Shares”), in which
case ROIC expects to receive aggregate net cash proceeds at settlement equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward
sale  agreement  multiplied  by  the  relevant  forward  sale  price.  However,  ROIC  may  also  elect  to  cash  settle  or  net  share  settle  a  particular  forward  sale
agreement, in which case ROIC may not receive any proceeds from the issuance of shares of Common Stock, and ROIC will instead receive or pay cash (in
the case of cash settlement) or receive or deliver shares of Common Stock (in the case of net share settlement).

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  ROIC  sold  a  total  of  1,288,213  shares  under  the  Sales  Agreement,  which  resulted  in  gross  proceeds  of
approximately $25.2 million and commissions of approximately $252,000 paid to the Agents.

The  Company  plans  to  finance  future  acquisitions  through  a  combination  of  operating  cashflow,  borrowings  under  the  credit  facility,  the  assumption  of
existing mortgage debt, the issuance of equity securities including OP Units, equity and debt offerings, and the potential sale of existing assets.

Business Segments

The Company’s primary business is the ownership, management, and redevelopment of retail real estate properties. The Company reviews operating and
financial  information  for  each  property  on  an  individual  basis  and  therefore,  each  property  represents  an  individual  operating  segment.  The  Company
evaluates  financial  performance  using  property  operating  income,  defined  as  operating  revenues  (rental  revenue  and  other  income),  less  property  and
related  expenses  (property  operating  expenses  and  property  taxes).  The  Company  has  aggregated  the  properties  into  one  reportable  segment  as  the
properties share

9

 
 
 
 
similar  long-term  economic  characteristics  and  have  other  similarities  including  the  fact  that  they  are  operated  using  consistent  business  strategies,  are
typically located in major metropolitan areas, and have similar tenant mixes.

Regulation

The  following  discussion  describes  certain  material  U.S.  federal  laws  and  regulations  that  may  affect  the  Company’s  operations  and  those  of  its
tenants. However, the discussion does not address state laws and regulations, except as otherwise indicated. These state laws and regulations, like the U.S.
federal laws and regulations, could affect the Company’s operations and those of its tenants.

Generally,  real  estate  properties  are  subject  to  various  laws,  ordinances  and  regulations.  Changes  in  any  of  these  laws  or  regulations,  such  as  the
Comprehensive  Environmental  Response  and  Compensation,  and  Liability  Act  of  1980,  as  amended,  increase  the  potential  liability  for  environmental
conditions  or  circumstances  existing  or  created  by  tenants  or  others  on  the  properties.  In  addition,  laws  affecting  development,  construction,  operation,
upkeep, safety and taxation requirements may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of real estate property sites or other impairments, which
would adversely affect its cash flows from operating activities.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “Americans with Disabilities Act”) all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain
U.S.  federal  requirements  related  to  access  and  use  by  disabled  persons. A  number  of  additional  U.S.  federal,  state  and  local  laws  also  exist  that  may
require modifications to properties, or restrict certain further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. Noncompliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to
correct any non-complying feature which could result in substantial capital expenditures. To the extent the Company’s properties are not in compliance, the
Company may incur additional costs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Property management activities are often subject to state real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real estate commission
for each state.

Environmental Matters

Pursuant to U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be required to
investigate,  remove  and/or  remediate  a  release  of  hazardous  substances  or  other  regulated  materials  at  or  emanating  from  such  property.  Further,  under
certain circumstances, such owners or operators of real property may be held liable for property damage, personal injury and/or natural resource damage
resulting from or arising in connection with such releases. Certain of these laws have been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisible
and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. The failure to properly remediate the property may also adversely affect the owner’s ability
to lease, sell or rent the property or to borrow funds using the property as collateral.

In connection with the ownership, operation and management of the Company’s current properties and any properties that it may acquire and/or manage in
the future, the Company could be legally responsible for environmental liabilities or costs relating to a release of hazardous substances or other regulated
materials at or emanating from such property. In order to assess the potential for such liability, the Company conducts an environmental assessment of each
property prior to acquisition and manages its properties in accordance with environmental laws while it owns or operates them. All of its leases contain a
comprehensive environmental provision that requires tenants to conduct all activities in compliance with environmental laws and to indemnify the owner
for any harm caused by the failure to do so. In addition, the Company has engaged qualified, reputable and adequately insured environmental consulting
firms to perform environmental site assessments of its properties and is not aware of any environmental issues that are expected to materially impact the
financial condition of the Company.

Competition

The Company believes that competition for the acquisition, operation and development of retail properties is highly fragmented. The Company competes
with numerous owners, operators and developers for acquisitions and development of retail properties, including institutional investors, other REITs and
other  owner-operators  of  necessity-based  community  and  neighborhood  shopping  centers,  primarily  anchored  by  supermarkets  and  drugstores,  some  of
which own or may in the future own properties similar to the Company’s in the same markets in which its properties are located. The Company also faces
competition in leasing available space to prospective tenants at its properties. The actual competition for tenants varies depending upon the characteristics
of each local market (including current economic conditions) in which the Company owns and manages property. The Company believes that the principal
competitive  factors  in  attracting  tenants  in  its  market  areas  are  location,  demographics,  price,  the  presence  of  anchor  stores  and  the  appearance  of
properties.

10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Many  of  the  Company’s  competitors  are  substantially  larger  and  have  considerably  greater  financial,  marketing  and  other  resources  than  the
Company. Other entities may raise significant amounts of capital and may have investment objectives that overlap with those of the Company, which may
create  additional  competition  for  opportunities  to  acquire  assets.  In  the  future,  competition  from  these  entities  may  reduce  the  number  of  suitable
investment opportunities offered to the Company or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Further, as a result of their greater
resources, such entities may have more flexibility than the Company does in their ability to offer rental concessions to attract tenants. If the Company’s
competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates, or below the rental rates the Company currently charges its tenants, the Company may
lose potential tenants and it may be pressured to reduce its rental rates below those it currently charges in order to retain tenants when its tenants’ leases
expire.

Employees and Human Capital Management

As of December 31, 2022, the Company had 70 employees, including 19 maintenance employees at its shopping centers and three executive officers, one
of whom is also a member of its board of directors. The Company believes that its talented and committed employees are the foundation of its success and
supporting employees, tenants and communities is at the heart of the Company’s business model.

Diversity and Inclusion. The Company values and advances a diverse and inclusive workplace and strives to create equal opportunities for all current and
future employees. As an equal opportunity employer, the Company is committed to maintaining an equitable workplace that is free from discrimination or
harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, disability, military or veteran
status,  genetic  information,  or  other  statuses  protected  by  applicable  federal,  state,  and  local  law.  The  Company  does  not  tolerate  disrespectful  or
inappropriate  behavior,  harassment,  unfair  treatment  or  retaliation  of  any  kind,  and  has  instituted  annual  diversity  and  inclusion  training  for  all  ROIC
employees.

The Company believes that its success is dependent upon the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of its employees and directors and strives to build a
culture that is collaborative, diverse, supportive and inclusive. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 50% of the Company’s employees identified as a
racial or ethnic minority and approximately 70% of the Company’s employees were female. In 2020, the Company also adopted environmental, social and
governance (“ESG”) metrics as part of its long-term incentive compensation plan that included holding a diversity and inclusion training for employees.
Following the initial training, this is now required annually.

Training and Education. The Company supports the continual development of its employees by providing educational and training opportunities to help
advance  their  personal  and  professional  growth  and  skills,  including  accounting  and  continuing  education  classes,  professional  certifications,  software
training  and  industry  workshops  and  seminars,  in  addition  to  diversity  and  inclusion  training  and  harassment  training,  for  both  supervisors  and  non-
supervisors.

Employee  Wellness  and  Benefits.  The  physical  and  mental  health  and  wellness  of  the  Company’s  employees  is  paramount.  The  Company  provides
employees with competitive compensation and a wide range of benefits including comprehensive medical and dental insurance coverage, short and long-
term  disability  benefits,  a  401(K)  retirement  program  with  matching,  vacation,  sick  and  personal  leave,  flexible  work  arrangements,  flexible  savings
accounts, and other benefits.

Community Engagement. The Company’s properties provide essential services to the communities in which they are located and the Company understands
that they play an important role in making these communities better places to live and work. The Company is committed to making a positive impact in its
communities and engages in community activities such as hosting and/or sponsoring free or not-for-profit led community events at its properties throughout
the year.

ESG Highlights

2022 Green Lease Leader

•

The  Company  was  awarded  the  “Gold”  level  designation  for  the  second  year  in  a  row  by  the  U.S.  Department  of  Energy’s  Better  Buildings
Alliance  and  Institute  for  Market  Transformation  due  to  its  efforts  to  incorporate  energy  efficiency,  cost  savings,  air  quality  and  sustainability
criteria into lease agreements.

11

 
 
 
Sustainability Reporting

•

•

The Company responded to the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark for the first time in 2021.

The  Company  reported  in  line  with  the  Sustainability  Accounting  Standards  Board  standards  and  the  Task  Force  on  Climate-related  Financial
Disclosures, disclosing information sought by investors.

Energy Management and Clean Energy Infrastructure

•

•

The Company continues to focus on improving energy efficiency at all of its properties and achieved a 15% year-over-year reduction (at like-for-
like properties) in energy usage from 2020 to 2021.

The Company is implementing measures such as leasing its roof space to solar companies and installing electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations,
smart irrigation controllers and LED lighting, and as of December 31, 2022, the Company has:

◦

◦

◦

◦

Solar agreements at nine of its properties, representing approximately 18% of its portfolio by gross leasable area.

65 EV charging stations at eight of its properties and has entered into agreements to add an additional 23 EV charging stations across a
collective four properties within the next twelve months.

Installed smart irrigation controllers and monitoring systems at 17 California shopping centers located in drought-vulnerable regions.

Converted the common area lighting to LED at nine shopping centers.

Additional information regarding the Company’s human capital programs and initiatives is available in the Company’s ESG Report, which can be found on
the  Company’s  website.  Information  on  the  Company’s  website,  including  its  ESG  Report,  is  not  incorporated  by  reference  into  this  Annual  Report  on
Form 10-K.

Available Information

The Company files its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  “SEC”).  The  SEC  maintains  a  website  (www.sec.gov)  that  contains  reports,  proxy  and  information
statements,  and  other  information  regarding  issuers  that  file  electronically  with  the  SEC.  The  Company’s  website  is  www.roireit.net.  The  Company’s
reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on its Website as soon as reasonably practicable
after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The contents of the Company’s website are not incorporated by
reference herein.

12

 
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Risks Related to the Company’s Business and Operations

There are risks relating to investments in real estate.

Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. Real estate values are affected by a number of factors, including: changes in the general
economic  climate,  local  conditions  (such  as  an  oversupply  of  space  or  a  reduction  in  demand  for  real  estate  in  an  area),  the  quality  and  philosophy  of
management,  competition  from  other  available  space,  the  ability  of  the  owner  to  provide  adequate  maintenance  and  insurance  and  to  control  variable
operating costs, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, pandemics and other public health crises, wars, terrorist activities and other factors in the
areas in which the properties are located. Shopping centers, in particular, may be affected by changing perceptions of retailers or shoppers regarding the
safety,  convenience  and  attractiveness  of  the  shopping  center,  increasing  consumer  purchases  through  online  retail  websites  and  catalogs,  the  ongoing
consolidation  in  the  retail  sector  and  by  the  overall  climate  for  the  retail  industry  generally.  Real  estate  values  are  also  affected  by  such  factors  as
government regulations, interest rate levels, the availability of financing and potential liability under, and changes in, environmental, zoning, tax and other
laws. A  significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  income  is  derived  from  rental  income  from  real  property.  The  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of
operations, financial condition, liquidity and ability to service its debt obligations could be materially and adversely affected if a significant number of its
tenants  were  unable  to  meet  their  obligations,  or  if  it  were  unable  to  lease  on  economically  favorable  terms  a  significant  amount  of  space  in  its
properties.  In  the  event  of  default  by  a  tenant,  the  Company  may  experience  delays  in  enforcing,  and  incur  substantial  costs  to  enforce,  its  rights  as  a
landlord.  In  addition,  certain  significant  expenditures  associated  with  each  equity  investment  (such  as  mortgage  payments,  real  estate  taxes  and
maintenance costs) are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment.

The Company operates in a highly competitive market and competition may limit its ability to acquire desirable assets and to attract and retain tenants.

The Company operates in a highly competitive market. The Company’s profitability depends, in large part, on its ability to acquire its assets at favorable
prices and on trends impacting the retail industry in general, national, regional and local economic conditions, financial condition and operating results of
current  and  prospective  tenants  and  customers,  availability  and  cost  of  capital,  construction  and  renovation  costs,  taxes,  governmental  regulations,
legislation and population trends. Many of the Company’s competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, marketing and other
resources  than  it  does.  Other  entities  may  raise  significant  amounts  of  capital  and  may  have  investment  objectives  that  overlap  with  the  Company’s.  In
addition,  the  properties  that  the  Company  acquires  may  face  competition  from  similar  properties  in  the  same  market,  as  well  as  from  e-commerce
websites.  The  presence  of  competitive  alternatives  affects  the  Company’s  ability  to  lease  space  and  the  level  of  rents  it  can  obtain.  New  construction,
renovations and expansions at competing sites could also negatively affect the Company’s properties.

The  Company  may  change  any  of  its  strategies,  policies  or  procedures  without  stockholder  consent,  which  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  its
business.

The  Company  may  change  any  of  its  strategies,  policies  or  procedures  with  respect  to  acquisitions,  asset  allocation,  growth,  operations,  indebtedness,
financing strategy and distributions, including those related to maintaining its REIT qualification, at any time without the consent of its stockholders, which
could result in making acquisitions that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the types of acquisitions described in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K.  A  change  in  the  Company’s  strategy  may  increase  its  exposure  to  real  estate  market  fluctuations,  financing  risk,  default  risk  and  interest  rate
risk. Furthermore, a change in the Company’s asset allocation could result in the Company making acquisitions in asset categories different from those
described  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.  These  changes  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and
other distributions to its stockholders.

The Company’s directors are subject to potential conflicts of interest.

The  Company’s  executive  officers  and  directors  may  face  conflicts  of  interest.  Except  for  Messrs. Tanz,  Haines  and  Schoebel,  none  of  the  Company’s
executive officers or directors are required to commit substantially all of their business time to the Company. Also, in the course of their other business
activities, the Company’s directors may become aware of investment and business opportunities that may be appropriate for presentation to the Company
as well as the other entities with which they are

13

 
 
 
affiliated. They may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

As a result of multiple business affiliations, the Company’s non-management directors may have legal obligations relating to presenting opportunities to
acquire one or more properties, portfolios or real estate-related debt investments to other entities. The Company’s non-management directors (including the
Company’s non-executive Chairman) may present such opportunities to the other entities to which they owe pre-existing fiduciary duties before presenting
such opportunities to the Company. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise when the Company’s board of directors evaluates a particular opportunity.

Capital markets and economic conditions can materially affect the Company’s financial condition, its results of operations and the value of its assets.

There are many factors that can affect the value of the Company’s assets, including the state of the capital markets and the economy. Any reduction in
available financing may materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its financial objectives. Concern about the stability of the markets
generally  may  limit  the  Company’s  ability  and  the  ability  of  its  tenants  to  timely  refinance  maturing  liabilities  and  access  the  capital  markets  to  meet
liquidity needs. Although the Company will factor in these conditions in acquiring its assets, its long-term success depends in part on general economic
conditions and the stability and dependability of the financing market for retail real estate. If the national economy or the local economies in which the
Company  operates  were  to  experience  uncertainty,  or  if  general  economic  conditions  were  to  worsen,  the  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and
other distributions to its stockholders could be materially and adversely affected.

Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease the Company’s revenues and available cash.

In the case of many retail properties, the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could cause the Company to suffer lower revenues and operational
difficulties and could allow other tenants to exercise so-called “kick-out” clauses in their leases and terminate their lease or reduce their rents prior to the
normal  expiration  of  their  lease  terms. As  a  result,  the  bankruptcy  or  insolvency  of  major  tenants  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s
income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and
its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

Inflation  or  deflation  may  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,  liquidity,  the
ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and distributions to its stockholders.

Increased inflation could have a pronounced negative impact on the Company’s property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses, as
these costs could increase at a rate higher than the Company’s rents. Inflation could also have an adverse effect on consumer spending which could impact
the Company’s tenants’ sales and, in turn, the Company’s percentage rents, where applicable, and the willingness and ability of tenants to enter into or
renew  leases  and/or  honor  their  obligations  under  existing  leases.  Conversely,  deflation  could  lead  to  downward  pressure  on  rents  and  other  sources  of
income.

Compliance or failure to comply with safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.

The Company’s properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If
the Company fails to comply with these requirements, it could incur fines or private damage awards. The Company does not know whether compliance
with the requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that could affect its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition,
liquidity, prospects and ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to
its stockholders.

The Company expects to acquire additional properties and this may create risks.

The Company expects to acquire additional properties consistent with its investment strategies. The Company may not, however, succeed in consummating
desired acquisitions on time, within budget or at all. In addition, the Company may face competition in pursuing acquisition opportunities, which could
result in increased acquisition costs. When the Company does pursue a project or acquisition, it may not succeed in leasing newly acquired properties at
rents sufficient to cover its costs of acquisition. Difficulties in integrating acquisitions may prove costly or time-consuming and could result in poorer than
anticipated performance. The Company may also abandon acquisition opportunities that it has begun pursuing and consequently

14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
fail  to  recover  expenses  already  incurred.  Furthermore,  acquisitions  of  new  properties  will  expose  the  Company  to  the  liabilities  of  those  properties,
including, for example, liabilities for clean-up of disclosed or undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by persons in respect of events transpiring
or conditions existing before the Company’s acquisition and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by
the former owners of properties.

In the event the Company seeks to redevelop existing properties, these projects could be subject to delays or other risks and might not yield the returns
anticipated, which would harm the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

The Company may selectively engage in redevelopment projects at certain of its properties. To the extent the Company enters into redevelopment projects,
it will be subject to a number of risks that could negatively affect its return on investment, financial condition, results of operations and the Company’s
ability to make distributions to stockholders, including, among others:

•

•

•

higher than anticipated construction costs, including labor, materials and higher than anticipated financing costs;

delayed ability or inability to reach projected occupancy, rental rates, profitability, and investment return;

timing  delays  due  to  weather,  labor  disruptions,  supply  chain  disruptions,  zoning  or  other  regulatory  approvals,  tenant  decision  delays,  delays  in
anchor approvals of redevelopment plans, where required, acts of God (such as fires, significant storms, earthquakes or floods), pandemics and other
public  health  crises,  wars,  terrorist  activities  and  other  factors  outside  the  Company’s  control,  which  might  make  a  project  less  profitable  or
unprofitable, or delay profitability; and

•

expenditure of money and time on projects that might be significantly delayed before stabilization.

If a project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting its expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, the
Company could lose its investment in the project or have to incur an impairment charge relating to the asset or development which could then adversely
impact the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

The Company faces risks associated with the development and redevelopment of mixed-use commercial properties.

The Company may continue to expand its investment focus to include more complex mixed-use development and redevelopment projects that pose unique
risks to the Company’s return on investment. Mixed-use projects refer to real estate projects that, in addition to retail space, may also include space for
residential,  office,  hotel  or  other  commercial  purposes.  The  Company  has  less  experience  in  developing  and  redeveloping  and  managing  non-retail  real
estate than it does retail real estate. As a result, if a development or redevelopment project includes a non-retail use, the Company may seek to develop that
component itself, sell the rights to that component to a third-party developer, or partner with a developer. The Company may be exposed not only to those
risks typically associated with the development or redevelopment of retail real estate, but also to risks associated with developing, owning, operating or
selling non-retail real estate, with which the Company has less experience, including but not limited to complex entitlement processes. These unique risks
may adversely impact the return on investment in these mixed-use development or redevelopment projects. If the Company sells the non-retail components,
the Company’s retail component may be impacted by the decisions made by the other owners, and actions of those occupying the non-retail spaces in these
mixed-use properties. If the Company partners with a developer, the Company might be dependent upon the partner’s ability to perform and to agree on
major decisions that impact the Company’s investment returns of the project. In addition, there is a risk that the non-retail developer may default on its
obligations necessitating that the Company complete the other components itself, including providing necessary financing.

Factors affecting the general retail environment could adversely affect the financial condition of the Company’s retail tenants and the willingness of
retailers to lease space in its shopping centers, and in turn, materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Company’s properties are focused on the retail real estate market. This means that the performance of the Company’s properties will be impacted by
general  retail  market  conditions,  including  the  level  of  consumer  spending  and  consumer  confidence,  changing  perceptions  of  retailers  or  shoppers
regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the shopping centers, and increasing competition from online retail websites and catalog companies.
In addition, the retail business is highly competitive and the Company’s tenants may fail to differentiate their shopping experiences, create an attractive
value  proposition  or  execute  their  business  strategies.  Furthermore,  the  Company  believes  that  the  increase  in  digital  and  mobile  technology  usage  has
increased the speed of the transition from shopping at physical locations to web-based purchases and that its tenants may be negatively affected by these
changing consumer spending habits. These conditions could adversely affect the

15

 
financial condition of the Company’s retail tenants and the willingness and ability of retailers to lease space, or renew existing leases, in the Company’s
shopping centers and to honor their obligations under existing leases, and in turn, materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Company’s growth depends on external sources of capital, which may not be available in the future.

In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company is required under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”) to annually
distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. Because
of  these  distribution  requirements,  the  Company  may  not  be  able  to  fund  all  future  capital  needs,  including  acquisitions,  from  income  from  operations.
After the Company invests its cash on hand, it expects to depend primarily on the credit facility and other external financing (including debt and equity
financings) to fund the growth of its business. The Company’s access to debt or equity financing depends on the willingness of third parties to lend or make
equity investments and on conditions in the capital markets generally. As a result of changing economic conditions, the Company may be limited in its
ability  to  obtain  additional  financing  or  to  refinance  existing  debt  maturities  on  favorable  terms  or  at  all  and  there  can  be  no  assurances  as  to  when
financing conditions will improve.

The Company does not have a formal policy limiting the amount of debt it may incur and its board of directors may change its leverage policy without
stockholder consent, which could result in a different risk profile.

Although the Company’s charter and bylaws do not limit the amount of indebtedness the Company can incur, the Company’s policy is to employ prudent
amounts  of  leverage  and  use  debt  as  a  means  of  providing  additional  funds  for  the  acquisition  of  its  assets  and  the  diversification  of  its  portfolio. The
amount of leverage the Company will deploy for particular investments will depend upon its management team’s assessment of a variety of factors, which
may  include  the  anticipated  liquidity  and  price  volatility  of  the  assets  in  its  portfolio,  the  potential  for  losses,  the  availability  and  cost  of  financing  the
assets, the Company’s opinion of the creditworthiness of its financing counterparties, the health of the U.S. economy and commercial mortgage markets,
the Company’s outlook for the level, slope and volatility of interest rates, the credit quality of the tenants occupying space at the Company’s properties, and
the  need  for  the  Company  to  comply  with  financial  covenants  contained  in  the  Company’s  credit  agreements.  The  Company’s  board  of  directors  may
change its leverage policies at any time without the consent of its stockholders, which could result in an investment portfolio with a different risk profile.

The  Company  could  be  adversely  affected  if  it  or  any  of  its  subsidiaries  are  required  to  register  as  an  investment  company  under  the  Investment
Company Act of 1940 as amended (the “1940 Act”).

The Company conducts its operations so that neither it, nor the Operating Partnership nor any of the Company’s other subsidiaries, is required to register as
investment companies under the 1940 Act. If the Company, the Operating Partnership or the Company’s other subsidiaries are required to register as an
investment company but fail to do so, the unregistered entity would be prohibited from engaging in certain business, and criminal and civil actions could be
brought against such entity. In addition, the contracts of such entity would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint
a receiver to take control of the entity and liquidate its business.

Real estate investments’ value and income fluctuate due to conditions in the general economy and the real estate business, which may materially and
adversely affect the Company’s ability to service its debt and expenses.

The value of real estate fluctuates depending on conditions in the general and local economy and the real estate business. These conditions may also limit
the Company’s revenues and available cash. The rents the Company receives and the occupancy levels at its properties may decline as a result of adverse
changes  in  conditions  in  the  general  economy  and  the  real  estate  business.  If  rental  revenues  and/or  occupancy  levels  decline,  the  Company  generally
would expect to have less cash available to pay indebtedness and for distribution to its stockholders. In addition, some of the Company’s major expenses,
including mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally do not decline when the related rents decline.

The lack of liquidity of the Company’s assets could materially and adversely affect the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial
condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions
to its stockholders, and could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to value and sell its assets.

Real estate investments are relatively difficult to buy and sell quickly. As a result, the Company expects many of its investments will be illiquid and if it is
required  to  liquidate  all  or  a  portion  of  its  portfolio  quickly,  it  may  realize  significantly  less  than  the  value  at  which  it  had  previously  recorded  its
investments.

16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Company depends on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and collecting rent from tenants, some of whom may not be able to
pay.

The  Company’s  financial  results  depend  significantly  on  leasing  space  in  its  properties  to  tenants  on  economically  favorable  terms.  In  addition,  as  a
substantial  majority  of  the  Company’s  revenue  comes  from  renting  real  property,  the  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of  operations,  financial
condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to
its  stockholders  could  be  materially  and  adversely  affected  if  a  significant  number  of  its  tenants  cannot  pay  their  rent  or  if  the  Company  is  not  able  to
maintain  occupancy  levels  on  favorable  terms.  If  a  tenant  does  not  pay  its  rent,  the  Company  may  not  be  able  to  enforce  its  rights  as  landlord  without
delays and may incur substantial legal costs.

Some of the Company’s properties depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be materially and adversely affected by the
loss of or a store closure by one or more of these tenants.

The  Company’s  shopping  centers  are  primarily  anchored  by  national  and  regional  supermarkets  and  drug  stores.  The  value  of  the  retail  properties  the
Company acquires could be materially and adversely affected if these tenants fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to
continue operations or cease their operations. Adverse economic or other conditions may result in the closure of existing stores by tenants which may result
in  increased  vacancies  at  the  Company’s  properties. Any  periods  of  significant  vacancies  for  the  Company’s  properties  could  materially  and  adversely
impact the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of
its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

Loss of revenues from major tenants could reduce the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to
service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

The Company derives significant revenues from anchor tenants such as Albertsons / Safeway Supermarkets, Kroger Supermarkets and Rite Aid Pharmacy.
As of December 31, 2022, these tenants are the Company’s three largest tenants and accounted for 5.7%, 3.2% and 1.7%, respectively, of its annualized
base  rent  on  a  pro-rata  basis.  In  October  2022,  Albertsons  Companies,  Inc.,  the  owner  of  the  Albertsons  /  Safeway  brands,  and  The  Kroger  Company
announced  an  intention  to  merge  that  is  currently  undergoing  regulatory  review.  The  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of  operations,  financial
condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to
its stockholders could be materially and adversely affected by the loss of revenues in the event a major tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, experiences a
downturn in its business, materially defaults on its leases, does not renew its leases as they expire, or renews at lower rental rates.

The Company’s inability to receive reimbursements of Common Area Maintenance (“CAM”) costs from tenants could adversely affect the Company’s
cash flow.

CAM costs typically include allocable energy costs, repairs, maintenance and capital improvements to common areas, janitorial services, administrative,
property  and  liability  insurance  costs  and  security  costs. The  Company  may  acquire  properties  with  leases  with  variable  CAM  provisions  that  adjust  to
reflect inflationary increases or leases with a fixed CAM payment methodology which fixes its tenants’ CAM contributions. With respect to both variable
and fixed payment methodologies, the amount of reimbursements for CAM costs that the Company is entitled to receive from its tenants pursuant to the
terms of the respective lease agreements may be less than the actual CAM costs at the Company’s properties. The Company’s inability to recover or pass
on  CAM  costs  to  its  tenants,  whether  due  to  the  terms  of  the  Company’s  leases  or  vacancies  at  the  Company’s  properties,  could  adversely  affect  the
Company’s cash flow.

The Company may incur costs to comply with environmental laws.

The Company’s operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment,
including  air  and  water  quality,  hazardous  or  toxic  substances  and  health  and  safety.  Under  some  environmental  laws,  a  current  or  previous  owner  or
operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property. The owner or operator may also be
held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those
parties  because  of  the  contamination.  These  laws  often  impose  liability  without  regard  to  whether  the  owner  or  operator  knew  of  the  release  of  the
substances or caused the release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may impair the Company’s ability to sell or lease
real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those that can require
the abatement or removal of asbestos-

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
containing  materials  in  the  event  of  damage,  demolition,  renovation  or  remodeling  and  also  govern  emissions  of  and  exposure  to  asbestos  fibers  in  the
air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) and underground storage
tanks  are  also  regulated  by  federal  and  state  laws.  The  Company  is  also  subject  to  risks  associated  with  human  exposure  to  chemical  or  biological
contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and
symptoms in susceptible individuals. The Company could incur fines for environmental compliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with
respect to the foregoing regulated substances or tanks or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure to contamination at
or  from  its  properties.  Identification  of  compliance  concerns  or  undiscovered  areas  of  contamination,  changes  in  the  extent  or  known  scope  of
contamination,  discovery  of  additional  sites,  human  exposure  to  the  contamination  or  changes  in  cleanup  or  compliance  requirements  could  result  in
significant costs to the Company. Moreover, compliance with new laws or regulations such as those related to climate change, including compliance with
“green” building codes, or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditures by the Company.

The Company faces risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions
of its information technology (“IT”) networks and related systems. 

The Company faces risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses,
attachments  to  e-mails,  persons  inside  the  Company  or  persons  with  access  to  systems  inside  the  Company,  and  other  significant  disruptions  of  the
Company’s IT networks and related systems, including due to defects in design, equipment or system failures, human error and natural disasters. The risk
of  a  security  breach  or  disruption,  particularly  through  cyber  attack  or  cyber  intrusion,  including  by  computer  hackers,  foreign  governments  and  cyber
terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. The
Company’s  IT  networks  and  related  systems  are  essential  to  the  operation  of  its  business  and  its  ability  to  perform  day-to-day  operations  (including
managing its building systems). There can be no assurance that the Company’s efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks
and related systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other
significant disruption involving the Company’s IT networks and related systems could materially and adversely impact the Company’s income, cash flow,
results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay
dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

These risks require continuous and likely increasing attention and other resources from the Company to, among other actions, identify and quantify these
risks, upgrade and expand the Company’s technologies, systems and processes to adequately address them and provide periodic training for the Company’s
employees to assist them in detecting phishing, malware and other schemes. Such attention diverts time and other resources from other activities and there
is no assurance that the Company’s efforts will be effective. Additionally, the Company relies on third-party service providers for certain aspects of the
Company’s business. The Company can provide no assurance that the networks and systems that the Company’s third-party vendors have established or
use will be effective. As the Company’s reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to the Company’s information systems, both internal
and those provided by the Company and third-party service providers.

In the normal course of business, the Company and its service providers collect and retain certain personal information provided by employees, tenants and
vendors.  The  Company  also  relies  extensively  on  computer  systems  to  process  transactions  and  manage  its  business.  The  Company  can  provide  no
assurance  that  the  data  security  measures  designed  to  protect  confidential  information  on  the  Company’s  systems  established  by  the  Company  and  the
Company’s service providers will be able to prevent unauthorized access to this personal information or that attempted security breaches or disruptions
would not be successful or damaging.

The Company’s business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures. 

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for the Company’s internal IT systems,
its systems are vulnerable to damage from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters,
terrorism,  war  and  telecommunication  failures. Any  system  failure  or  accident  that  causes  interruptions  in  the  Company’s  operations  could  result  in  a
material disruption to its business. The Company may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions.

18

 
 
 
A prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession or declining real estate values could impair the Company’s assets and have a material
and adverse effect on its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market
price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

The Company believes the risks associated with its business will be more severe during periods of economic slowdown or recession if these periods are
accompanied by declining real estate values. Declines in real estate values, among other factors, could result in a determination that the Company’s assets
have  been  impaired.  If  the  Company  determines  that  an  impairment  has  occurred,  the  Company  would  be  required  to  make  an  adjustment  to  the  net
carrying  value  of  the  asset  which  could  have  an  adverse  effect  on  its  results  of  operations  in  the  period  in  which  the  impairment  charge  is  recorded.
Although the Company will take current economic conditions into account in acquiring its assets, the Company’s long-term success, and the value of its
assets, depends in part on general economic conditions and other factors beyond the Company’s control. If the national economy or the local economies in
which  the  Company  operates  experience  uncertainty,  or  if  general  economic  conditions  were  to  worsen,  the  value  of  the  Company’s  properties  could
decline, and the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market
price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders, could be materially and adversely affected.

Loss of key personnel could harm the Company’s operations.

The Company is dependent on the efforts of certain key personnel of its senior management team. While the Company has employment contracts with each
of Messrs. Tanz, Haines and Schoebel, the loss of the services of any of these individuals could harm the Company’s operations and have a material and
adverse effect on its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its
common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

Under  their  employment  agreements,  certain  members  of  the  Company’s  senior  management  team  will  have  certain  rights  to  terminate  their
employment and receive severance in connection with a change in control of the Company.

The Company’s employment agreements with each of Messrs. Tanz, Haines and Schoebel, which provide that, upon termination of his employment (i) by
the applicable officer within 12 months following the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement), (ii) by the Company
without cause (as defined in the employment agreement), (iii) by the applicable officer for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), (iv) by
non-renewal of the applicable officer’s employment agreement or (v) by reason of the applicable officer’s death or disability (as defined in the employment
agreement), such executive officers would be entitled to certain termination or severance payments made by the Company (which may include a lump sum
payment equal to defined percentages of annual salary and prior years’ average bonuses, paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the respective
agreement). In addition, the vesting of all his outstanding unvested equity-based incentives and awards would accelerate. These provisions make it costly to
terminate their employment and could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control of the Company that might involve a premium paid for shares of
its common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of its stockholders.

Joint venture investments could be materially and adversely affected by the Company’s lack of sole decision-making authority or reliance on a joint
venture partner’s financial condition.

The  Company  may  enter  into  joint  venture  arrangements  in  the  future.  Investments  in  joint  ventures  involve  risks  that  are  not  otherwise  present  with
properties which the Company owns entirely. In a joint venture investment, the Company may not have exclusive control or sole decision-making authority
over the development, financing, leasing, management and other aspects of these investments. As a result, the joint venture partner might have economic or
business interests or goals that are inconsistent with the Company’s goals or interests, take action contrary to the Company’s interests or otherwise impede
the Company’s objectives. Joint venture investments involve risks and uncertainties, including the risk of the joint venture partner failing to provide capital
and fulfill its obligations, which may result in certain liabilities to the Company for guarantees and other commitments, the risk of conflicts arising between
the Company and its partners and the difficulty of managing and resolving such conflicts, and the difficulty of managing or otherwise monitoring such
business arrangements. The joint venture partner also might become insolvent or bankrupt, which may result in significant losses to the Company. Further,
although the Company may own a controlling interest in a joint venture and may have authority over major decisions such as the sale or refinancing of
investment properties, the Company may have fiduciary duties to the joint venture partners or the joint venture itself that may cause, or require, it to take or
refrain from taking actions that it would otherwise take if it owned the investment properties outright. In addition, in the case of mixed-use redevelopment
with a joint venture partner, the Company might be

19

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
exposed to risks associated with developing, owning, operating or selling non-retail real estate, with which the Company has less experience than with the
risks associated with retail real estate.

Uninsured losses or a loss in excess of insured limits could materially and adversely affect the Company.

The Company carries comprehensive general liability, fire, extended coverage, loss of rent insurance, and environmental liability where applicable on its
properties, with policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties. There are certain types of losses, such as losses resulting
from wars or acts of God that generally are not insured because they are either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Should an uninsured loss or a
loss in excess of insured limits occur, the Company could lose capital invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from a property,
while remaining obligated for any mortgage indebtedness, or other financial obligations or liabilities related to the property. Any loss of these types could
materially and adversely affect the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and ability to service its
debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

The Company could be materially and adversely affected by poor market conditions where its properties are geographically concentrated.

The Company’s performance depends on the economic conditions in markets in which its properties are concentrated. During the year ended December 31,
2022,  the  Company’s  properties  in  California,  Washington  and  Oregon  accounted  for  64%,  22%  and  14%,  respectively,  of  its  consolidated  property
operating  income.  The  Company’s  income,  cash  flow,  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,  liquidity,  the  ability  to  service  its  debt  obligations,  the
market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders could be materially and adversely affected by
this  geographic  concentration  if  market  conditions,  such  as  an  oversupply  of  space  or  a  reduction  in  demand  for  real  estate  in  an  area,  deteriorate  in
California, Washington or Oregon. Moreover, due to the geographic concentration of its properties, the Company may be disproportionately affected by
general risks such as natural disasters, including major fires, floods and earthquakes, severe or inclement weather, local regulatory requirements, and acts of
terrorism should such developments occur in or near the markets in California, Washington or Oregon in which the Company’s properties are located.

Should the Company decide at some point in the future to expand into new markets, it may not be successful, which could materially and adversely
affect its business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The  Company’s  properties  are  concentrated  in  California,  Washington  and  Oregon.  If  the  opportunity  arises,  the  Company  may  explore  acquisitions  of
properties  in  new  markets  inside  or  outside  of  these  states.  Each  of  the  risks  applicable  to  the  Company’s  ability  to  successfully  acquire,  integrate  and
operate properties in its current markets may also apply to its ability to successfully acquire, integrate and operate properties in new markets. In addition to
these risks, the Company’s management team may not possess the same level of knowledge with respect to market dynamics and conditions of any new
market in which the Company may attempt to expand, which could materially and adversely affect its ability to operate in any such markets. The Company
may be unable to obtain the desired returns on its investments in these new markets, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s income,
cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common stock and
its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

The  Company’s  business,  results  of  operations  and  financial  condition  have  been  and  may  in  the  future  be  adversely  impacted  by  the  COVID-19
pandemic or a future public health crisis.

The  Company  derives  substantially  all  of  its  revenues  from  rents  and  reimbursement  payments  received  from  tenants  under  lease  agreements  at  the
Company’s properties and, accordingly, the Company’s business is dependent on the ability of tenants to meet their obligations to the Company under such
lease agreements. The businesses of the Company’s tenants were significantly impacted following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic due to numerous
factors, including preventive measures taken by local, state and federal authorities to alleviate the public health crisis, such as “shelter-in-place” or “stay-at-
home” orders, mandatory business closures and restrictions on business operations, quarantines, restrictions on travel, restrictions on gatherings, and social
distancing  practices.  These  restrictions  have  been  lifted  and  all  of  the  Company’s  tenants  are  generally  operating  at  pre-pandemic  levels;  however,
resurgences and the evolution of new COVID-19 variants have caused and may continue to cause additional outbreaks. A worsening of the COVID-19
pandemic, or the onset of another public health crisis, could have material and adverse effects on the Company’s business, income, cash flow, results of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and ability to service the Company’s debt obligations and the Company’s ability to pay dividends and
other distributions to the Company’s stockholders due to, among other factors:

20

 
 
 
 
•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

the operations of the Company’s tenants could again be impacted by measures taken to prevent or alleviate a public health crisis and other factors,
which could (i) adversely affect the ability of tenants to meet their obligations to the Company under lease agreements or result in tenant bankruptcies,
and (ii) adversely affect the Company’s ability to collect rents, lease space and negotiate and maintain favorable rents, which could lead to a decline in
occupancy and rental revenues;

a  deterioration  in  consumer  sentiment,  changes  in  consumer  behavior  in  favor  of  e-commerce,  or  negative  public  perception  of  public  health  risks,
which could result in decreased foot traffic to the Company’s properties and tenant businesses for an extended period of time, could negatively impact
the Company’s tenants’ businesses and affect the ability of tenants to meet their obligations to the Company under lease agreements;

difficulty  accessing  debt  and  equity  capital  on  attractive  terms,  or  at  all,  and  a  severe  disruption  and  instability  in  the  global  financial  markets  or
deteriorations in credit and financing conditions may affect the Company’s access to capital necessary to fund business operations or address maturing
liabilities on a timely basis and the Company’s tenants’ abilities to fund their business operations and meet their obligations to the Company;

the financial impacts could negatively impact the Company’s ability to pay dividends to the Company’s stockholders;

the financial impacts could negatively impact the Company’s future compliance with financial covenants of the Company’s credit facility and other
debt agreements and could result in a default and potentially an acceleration of indebtedness, which non-compliance could also negatively impact the
Company’s  ability  to  make  additional  borrowings  under  the  Company’s  revolving  credit  facility  or  otherwise  pay  dividends  to  the  Company’s
stockholders;

the  worsening  of  estimated  future  cash  flows  due  to  a  change  in  the  Company’s  plans,  policies,  or  views  of  market  and  economic  conditions  as  it
relates to one or more of the Company’s adversely impacted properties could result in the recognition of substantial impairment charges imposed on
the Company’s assets;

the credit quality of the Company’s tenants could be negatively impacted and the Company may significantly increase the Company’s allowance for
doubtful accounts;

a  general  decline  in  business  activity  and  demand  for  real  estate  transactions  could  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  ability  or  desire  to  grow  the
Company’s portfolio of properties, or to sell properties as part of the Company’s capital recycling strategy;

difficulties completing the Company’s densification projects on a timely basis, on budget or at all; and

the potential negative impact on the health of the Company’s personnel, particularly if a significant number of them are impacted.

Certain  of  the  Company’s  tenants  experienced  economic  difficulties  as  a  result  of  the  impact  of  the  COVID-19  pandemic  and  sought  to  modify  their
obligations to the Company. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company entered into lease concessions that deferred approximately $10.9
million  of  contractual  amounts  billed.  As  of  December  31,  2022,  approximately  $9.5  million  of  such  amount  has  been  rebilled  in  accordance  with  the
underlying agreements, of which approximately $8.5 million has been collected.

The  extent  to  which  a  future  public  health  crisis  could  impact  the  Company’s  operations  and  those  of  the  Company’s  tenants  will  depend  on  future
developments,  including  the  scope,  severity  and  duration  of  such  crisis,  the  actions  taken  to  contain  or  mitigate  its  impact,  and  the  direct  and  indirect
economic effects of the crisis and any containment measures, among others, which could have a material impact on the Company’s revenues and could
materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, many risk factors set forth in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K should be interpreted as heightened risks as a result of a public health crisis.

21

Risks Related to Financing

The  Company’s  term  loan,  credit  facility  and  unsecured  senior  notes  contain  restrictive  covenants  relating  to  its  operations,  which  could  limit  the
Company’s ability to respond to changing market conditions and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

The  Company’s  term  loan,  credit  facility  and  unsecured  senior  notes  contain  restrictive  covenants. These  or  other  limitations,  including  those  that  may
apply to future Company borrowings, may materially and adversely affect the Company’s flexibility and its ability to achieve its operating plans and could
result in the Company being limited in the amount of dividends and distributions it would be permitted to pay to its stockholders.

In addition, failure to comply with these covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument, and the Company may then be required to
repay  such  debt  with  capital  from  other  sources.  Under  those  circumstances,  other  sources  of  capital  may  not  be  available  to  the  Company,  or  may  be
available only on unattractive terms.

Certain  of  the  Company’s  mortgage  financing  arrangements  and  other  indebtedness  contain  provisions  that  could  limit  the  Company’s  operating
flexibility.

The  Company’s  existing  mortgage  financing  contains,  and  future  mortgage  financing  may  contain,  customary  covenants  and  provisions  that  limit  the
Company’s ability to pre-pay such mortgages before their scheduled maturity date or to transfer the underlying asset. Additionally, the Company’s ability to
satisfy prospective mortgage lenders’ insurance requirements may be materially and adversely affected if lenders generally insist upon greater insurance
coverage against certain risks than is available to the Company in the marketplace or on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, because a mortgage is
secured by a lien on the underlying real property, mortgage defaults subject the Company to the risk of losing the property through foreclosure.

The Company’s access to financing may be limited and thus its ability to potentially enhance its returns may be materially and adversely affected.

The Company intends, when appropriate, to employ prudent amounts of leverage and use debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition
of  its  assets  and  the  diversification  of  its  portfolio.  As  of  December  31,  2022,  the  Company’s  outstanding  principal  mortgage  indebtedness  was
approximately  $60.7  million,  and  the  Company  may  incur  significant  additional  debt  to  finance  future  acquisition  and  development  activities.  As  of
December  31,  2022,  the  Company  had  $88.0  million  and  $300.0  million  outstanding  under  the  Company’s  $600.0  million  unsecured  revolving  credit
facility and $300.0 million term loan, respectively.

In addition, the Operating Partnership issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes in December 2017 (the “Senior Notes
Due  2027”),  $200.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  unsecured  senior  notes  in  September  2016  (the  “Senior  Notes  Due  2026”),  $250.0  million
aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes in December 2014 (the “Senior Notes Due 2024”) and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of
unsecured senior notes in December 2013 (the “Senior Notes Due 2023” and collectively with the Senior Notes Due 2024, the Senior Notes Due 2026 and
the Senior Notes Due 2027, the “unsecured senior notes”), each of which were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by ROIC.

The Company’s access to financing will depend upon a number of factors, over which it has little or no control, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

general market conditions;

the market’s view of the quality of the Company’s assets;

the market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential;

the Company’s eligibility to participate in and access capital from programs established by the U.S. government;

the Company’s current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and

the market price of the shares of the Company’s common stock. 

Any  reduction  in  available  financing  may  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  ability  to  achieve  its  financial  objectives.  Concern  about  the
stability of the markets generally could adversely affect one or more private lenders and could

22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
cause one or more private lenders to be unwilling or unable to provide the Company with financing or to increase the costs of that financing. In addition, if
regulatory  capital  requirements  imposed  on  the  Company’s  private  lenders  change,  they  may  be  required  to  limit  or  increase  the  cost  of  financing  they
provide to the Company. In general, this could potentially increase the Company’s financing costs and reduce its liquidity or require it to sell assets at an
inopportune time or price.

During times when interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, the Company may purchase certain
properties for cash or equity securities, including OP Units, or a combination thereof. Consequently, depending on market conditions at the relevant time,
the Company may have to rely more heavily on additional equity issuances, which may be dilutive to its stockholders, or on less efficient forms of debt
financing that require a larger portion of its cash flow from operations, thereby reducing funds available for its operations, future business opportunities,
cash distributions to its stockholders and other purposes. The Company cannot assure you that it will have access to such equity or debt capital on favorable
terms (including, without limitation, cost and term) at the desired times, or at all, which may cause it to curtail its asset acquisition activities and/or dispose
of assets, which could materially and adversely affect its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt
obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders.

Increases  in  interest  rates  could  increase  the  amount  of  the  Company’s  debt  payments  and  materially  and  adversely  affect  its  business,  financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Interest the Company pays could reduce cash available for distributions. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $88.0 million and $300.0 million
outstanding  under  the  Company’s  $600.0  million  unsecured  revolving  credit  facility  and  $300.0  million  term  loan,  respectively,  that  bear  interest  at  a
variable rate. In addition, the Company may incur variable rate debt in the future, including mortgage debt, borrowings under the credit facility or new
credit facilities or under the term loan or new term loans. The Federal Reserve Board of Governors increased the federal funds rate several times during
2022  and  has  announced  its  intention  to  determine  what  future  adjustments  are  appropriate,  including  as  a  result  of  concerns  over  inflation,  but  such
changes  in  fiscal  and  monetary  policies  are  beyond  the  Company’s  control  and  are  difficult  to  predict.  Increases  in  interest  rates  would  increase  the
Company’s interest costs, which could adversely affect the Company’s cash flow, results of operations, ability to pay principal and interest on debt and pay
dividends  and  other  distributions  to  its  stockholders,  and  reduce  the  Company’s  access  to  capital  markets.  In  addition,  if  the  Company  needs  to  repay
existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, it may be required to incur additional indebtedness at higher rates. From time to time, the Company
may  enter  into  interest  rate  swap  agreements  and  other  interest  rate  hedging  contracts  with  the  intention  of  lessening  the  impact  of  rising  interest  rates.
However, increased interest rates may increase the risk that the counterparties to such agreements may not be able to fulfill their obligations under these
agreements, and there can be no assurance that these arrangements will be effective in reducing the Company’s exposure to interest rate changes. These
risks  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  cash  flow,  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,  liquidity,  the  ability  to  service  its  debt
obligations, the market price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders. The Company’s use of interest
rate  hedging  arrangements  to  manage  risk  associated  with  interest  rate  volatility  may  expose  the  Company  to  additional  risks,  including  a  risk  that  a
counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to honor its obligations or that the Company could be required to fund the Company’s contractual payment
obligations under such arrangements in relatively large amounts or on short notice. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no
strategy can completely insulate the Company from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that the Company’s hedging
activities  will  have  the  desired  beneficial  impact  on  the  Company’s  results  of  operations,  liquidity  and  financial  condition.  The  Company’s  prior  four
interest rate swaps matured effective August 31, 2022, and the interest rate on the term loan was no longer effectively fixed and outstanding borrowings
under the term loan became subject to a variable interest rate.

The replacement of LIBOR may affect the value of certain of the Company’s financial obligations and could affect the Company’s results of operations
or financial condition.

As announced on March 5, 2021 by the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”) and the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, the IBA will cease
publishing the overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month settings of U.S. dollar LIBOR rates immediately after June 30, 2023. The Alternative
Reference Rates Committee (“ARCC”), which was convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York Federal Reserve Bank, has identified the
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the recommended risk-free alternative rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR. The ARRC has also recommended the
use of the CME Group’s computation of forward-looking SOFR term rates (“Term SOFR”), subject to certain recommended limitations on the scope of its
use.  In  March  2022,  the  Adjustable  Interest  Rate  (LIBOR)  Act  was  enacted  at  the  federal  level  in  the  United  States,  pursuant  to  which  the  Board  of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System has designated benchmark replacement rates based on SOFR for U.S. law governed legacy contracts that have no
or insufficient fallback provisions. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had outstanding approximately $388.0 million of variable rate debt that was
indexed to U.S. dollar LIBOR. There can be no assurance that any alternative rates used to determine interest on the Company’s variable rate

23

 
 
debt, including any version of SOFR or Term SOFR, plus any spread adjustment will be economically equivalent to U.S. dollar LIBOR. In addition, market
practices related to calculation conventions for replacement benchmark rates continue to develop and may vary, and inconsistent conventions may develop
among  financial  products.  Inconsistent  use  of  replacement  rates  or  calculation  conventions  among  financial  products  could  expose  the  Company  to
additional financial risks and increase the cost of any related hedging transactions. Furthermore, the transition away from U.S. dollar LIBOR may adversely
impact the Company’s ability to hedge exposures to fluctuations in interest rates using derivative instruments. It is not possible to predict all consequences
of the IBA’s plans to cease publishing U.S. dollar LIBOR, any related regulatory actions and the expected discontinuance of the use of U.S. dollar LIBOR
as  a  reference  rate  for  financial  contracts.  There  is  no  guarantee  that  a  transition  from  LIBOR  to  alternative  reference  rates  will  not  result  in  financial
market disruptions, hedging mismatches or significant increases in the Company’s borrowing costs or the costs of any related hedging, any of which could
have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition, and the market price of its common stock.

Financing arrangements that the Company may use to finance its assets may require it to provide additional collateral or pay down debt.

The  Company,  when  appropriate,  uses  traditional  forms  of  financing  including  secured  debt.  In  the  event  the  Company  utilizes  such  financing
arrangements,  they  would  involve  the  risk  that  the  market  value  of  its  assets  which  are  secured  may  decline  in  value,  in  which  case  the  lender  may,  in
connection with a refinancing, require it to provide additional collateral, provide additional equity, or to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced. The
Company may not have the funds available to repay its debt or provide additional equity at that time, which would likely result in defaults unless it is able
to raise the funds from alternative sources, which it may not be able to achieve on favorable terms or at all. Providing additional collateral or equity would
reduce the Company’s liquidity and limit its ability to leverage its assets. If the Company cannot meet these requirements, the lender could accelerate the
Company’s  indebtedness,  increase  the  interest  rate  on  advanced  funds  and  terminate  its  ability  to  borrow  funds  from  them,  which  could  materially  and
adversely affect the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market
price of its common stock and its ability to pay dividends and other distributions to its stockholders. The providers of secured debt may also require the
Company to maintain a certain amount of cash or set aside assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position. As a result, the Company may not be
able to leverage its assets as fully as it would choose which could reduce its return on assets. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
utilize such arrangements on favorable terms, or at all.

A  downgrade  in  the  Company’s  or  the  Operating  Partnership’s  credit  ratings  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  business  and
financial condition. 

The  credit  ratings  assigned  to  the  Company’s  obligations  or  to  the  debt  securities  of  the  Operating  Partnership  could  change  based  upon,  among  other
things,  the  Company’s  and  the  Operating  Partnership’s  results  of  operations  and  financial  condition.  These  ratings  are  subject  to  ongoing  evaluation  by
credit rating agencies, and there can be no assurance that any rating will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment,
circumstances warrant. Moreover, these credit ratings do not apply to the Company’s common stock and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold any
other  securities.  If  any  of  the  credit  rating  agencies  that  have  rated  the  obligations  of  the  Company  or  the  debt  securities  of  the  Operating  Partnership
downgrades or lowers its credit ratings, or if any credit rating agency indicates that it has placed any such rating on a so-called “watch list” for a possible
downgrading or lowering or otherwise indicates that its outlook for that rating is negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s costs
and availability of capital, which could in turn materially and adversely impact the Company’s income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition,
liquidity,  the  ability  to  service  its  debt  obligations,  the  market  price  of  its  common  stock  and  its  ability  to  pay  dividends  and  other  distributions  to  its
stockholders.

Risks Related to the Company’s Organization and Structure

The  Company  depends  on  dividends  and  distributions  from  its  direct  and  indirect  subsidiaries.  The  creditors  of  these  subsidiaries  are  entitled  to
amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or distributions to the Company.

Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held through the Operating Partnership, which holds substantially all of the Company’s properties and assets
through subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership’s cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to it by its subsidiaries, and in turn, substantially all of the
Company’s cash flow is dependent on cash distributions to it by the Operating Partnership. The creditors of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries
are entitled to payment of that subsidiary’s obligations to them, when due and payable, before distributions may be made by that subsidiary to its common
equity holders. Thus, the Operating Partnership’s ability to make distributions to the Company and therefore the Company’s

24

 
 
 
 
ability  to  make  distributions  to  its  stockholders  will  depend  on  its  subsidiaries’  ability  first  to  satisfy  their  obligations  to  creditors  and  then  to  make
distributions to the Operating Partnership.

In addition, the Company’s participation in any distribution of the assets of any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or
insolvency, is only after the claims of the creditors, including the holders of the unsecured senior notes and trade creditors, are satisfied.

Certain provisions of Maryland law may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of the Company.

Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a
change in control of the Company that might involve a premium price for holders of the Company’s common stock or otherwise be in their best interests,
including:

•

•

“business  combination”  provisions  that,  subject  to  certain  limitations,  prohibit  certain  business  combinations  between  the  Company  and  an
“interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the Company’s shares or an
affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose special
minimum price provisions and special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

“control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of the Company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled
by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control
share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent
approved by the Company’s stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all
interested shares.

However,  the  provisions  of  the  MGCL  relating  to  business  combinations  do  not  apply  to  business  combinations  that  are  approved  or  exempted  by  the
Company’s  board  of  directors  prior  to  the  time  that  the  interested  stockholder  becomes  an  interested  stockholder.  In  addition,  the  Company’s  bylaws
contain  a  provision  exempting  from  the  control  share  acquisition  statute  any  and  all  acquisitions  by  any  person  of  shares  of  the  Company’s  common
stock. There can be no assurance that such exemption will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

Additionally, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits the Company’s board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently
provided in the Company’s charter or bylaws, to take certain actions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change
in control of the Company that might involve a premium to the market price of its common stock or otherwise be in the stockholders’ best interests. These
provisions  of  the  MGCL  permit  the  Company,  by  provision  in  its  charter  or  bylaws  or  a  resolution  of  its  board  of  directors  and  notwithstanding  any
contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to adopt:

•

•

•

•

•

a classified board;

a two-thirds vote requirement for removing a director;

a requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote of the board of directors;

a requirement that a vacancy on the board be filled only by the remaining directors in office and (if the board is classified) for the remainder of the
full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred; and

a majority requirement for the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting of stockholders.

The  authorized  but  unissued  shares  of  preferred  stock  and  the  ownership  limitations  contained  in  the  Company’s  charter  may  prevent  a  change  in
control.

The Company’s charter authorizes the Company to issue authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. In addition, the Company’s charter provides that
the Company’s board of directors has the power, without stockholder approval, to authorize the Company to issue any authorized but unissued shares of
stock, to classify any unissued shares of preferred stock and to reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or previously-classified shares of preferred
stock into other classes or series of stock. As a result, the Company’s board of directors may establish a series of shares of preferred stock or use such
preferred stock to create a stockholder’s rights plan or so-called “poison pill” that could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in

25

 
 
 
 
 
control that might involve a premium price for shares of the Company’s common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders.

In  addition,  the  Company’s  charter  contains  restrictions  limiting  the  ownership  and  transfer  of  shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock  and  other
outstanding shares of capital stock. The relevant sections of the Company’s charter provide that, subject to certain exceptions, ownership of shares of the
Company’s common stock by any person is limited to 9.8% by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of
common stock (the common share ownership limit), and no more than 9.8% by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding
capital stock (the aggregate share ownership limit). The common share ownership limit and the aggregate share ownership limit are collectively referred to
herein as the “ownership limits.” These provisions will restrict the ability of persons to purchase shares in excess of the relevant ownership limits. The
Company’s board of directors has established exemptions from this ownership limit which permit certain institutional investors to hold additional shares of
the  Company’s  common  stock.  The  Company’s  board  of  directors  may  in  the  future,  in  its  sole  discretion,  establish  additional  exemptions  from  this
ownership limit.

The Company’s failure to qualify as a REIT would subject it to U.S. federal income tax and potentially increased state and local taxes, which would
reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to its stockholders.

The Company intends to operate in a manner that will enable it to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company has
not requested and does not intend to request a ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that it will continue to qualify as a REIT. The U.S. federal
income tax laws governing REITs are complex. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable U.S. Treasury Department regulations that have
been promulgated under the Code (“Treasury Regulations”) is greater in the case of a REIT that holds assets through a partnership, such as the Company,
and  judicial  and  administrative  interpretations  of  the  U.S.  federal  income  tax  laws  governing  REIT  qualification  are  limited. To  qualify  as  a  REIT,  the
Company must meet, on an ongoing basis, various tests regarding the nature of its assets and its income, the ownership of its outstanding shares, and the
amount of its distributions. Moreover, new legislation, court decisions or administrative guidance, in each case possibly with retroactive effect, may make it
more  difficult  or  impossible  for  the  Company  to  qualify  as  a  REIT.  Thus,  while  the  Company  believes  that  it  has  operated  and  intends  to  continue  to
operate so that it will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations,
and the possibility of future changes in the Company’s circumstances, no assurance can be given that it has qualified or will continue to so qualify for any
particular year.

If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it would be required to pay U.S.
federal income tax on its taxable income, and distributions to its stockholders would not be deductible by it in determining its taxable income. In such a
case, the Company might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay its taxes. The Company’s payment of income tax would decrease the amount
of its income available for distribution to its stockholders. Furthermore, if the Company fails to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it would no longer be
required to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income to its stockholders. In addition, unless the Company were eligible for certain statutory relief
provisions, it would not be eligible to re-elect to qualify as a REIT for four taxable years following the year in which it failed to qualify as a REIT.

Failure to make required distributions would subject the Company to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to its stockholders.

In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company must distribute to its stockholders each calendar year at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined
without  regard  to  the  deduction  for  dividends  paid  and  excluding  net  capital  gain.  To  the  extent  that  the  Company  satisfies  the  90%  distribution
requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, it is subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its undistributed income. In addition,
the Company will incur a 4% non-deductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which its distributions in any calendar year are less than a minimum
amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. The Company intends to distribute its net income to its stockholders in a manner intended to satisfy
the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid the 4% non-deductible excise tax.

The  Company’s  taxable  income  may  exceed  its  net  income  as  determined  by  the  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“GAAP”)  because,  for
example,  realized  capital  losses  will  be  deducted  in  determining  its  GAAP  net  income,  but  may  not  be  deductible  in  computing  its  taxable  income.  In
addition, the Company may invest in assets that generate taxable income in excess of economic income or in advance of the corresponding cash flow from
the assets. For example, the Company may be required to accrue interest or other income on debt securities before it receives payments on such assets, and
under certain circumstances the Company could also be required to accrue income on leases in advance of receiving cash payments under the terms of such
leases. As a result of the foregoing, the Company may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year. To the extent that the Company
generates such non-cash taxable income in a taxable year, it may incur corporate income

26

 
 
 
 
 
tax and the 4% non-deductible excise tax on that income if it does not distribute such income to stockholders in that year. In that event, the Company may
be required to use cash reserves, incur debt or liquidate assets at rates or times that it regards as unfavorable or make a taxable distribution of its shares in
order to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal corporate income tax and the 4% non-deductible excise tax in that year.

In  order  to  qualify  as  a  REIT,  prior  to  the  end  of  each  taxable  year,  the  Company  is  required  to  distribute  any  earnings  and  profits  of  any  corporation
acquired by the Company in certain tax-deferred transactions to the extent that such earnings accrued at a time when such corporation did not qualify as a
REIT. The Company has entered into certain transactions involving the tax-deferred acquisition of target corporations. The Company believes that it did not
inherit  any  earnings  and  profits  of  such  target  corporations  attributable  to  any  period  that  such  corporations  did  not  qualify  as  a  REIT.  However,  no
assurance can be provided in this regard, and if the Company were determined to have inherited and retained any such earnings and profits, the Company’s
qualification as a REIT could be adversely impacted.

To maintain its REIT qualification, the Company may be forced to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions.

In order to qualify as a REIT and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, the Company may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis, or possibly
on  a  long-term  basis,  to  meet  the  REIT  distribution  requirements  even  if  the  then  prevailing  market  conditions  are  not  favorable  for  these
borrowings.  These  borrowing  needs  could  result  from,  among  other  things,  a  difference  in  timing  between  the  actual  receipt  of  cash  and  inclusion  of
income  for  U.S.  federal  income  tax  purposes,  the  effect  of  non-deductible  capital  expenditures,  the  creation  of  reserves  or  required  debt  amortization
payments.

The U.S. federal income tax treatment regarding cash settlement of a forward sale agreement is unclear and could jeopardize the Company’s ability to
meet the REIT qualification requirements.

In  the  event  that  the  Company  elects  to  settle  any  forward  sale  agreement  with  respect  to  the  Company’s  at-the-market  offering  described  above  under
“Business—Financing Activities—ATM Equity Offering” for cash and the settlement price is different than the applicable forward sale price, the Company
will either receive a cash payment from or make a cash payment to the relevant Forward Purchaser. Under Section 1032 of the Code, generally, no gain or
loss is recognized by a corporation in dealing in its own stock, including pursuant to a “securities futures contract.” Although the Company believes that
any amount received by the Company in exchange for its common stock would qualify for the exemption under Section 1032 of the Code, it is unclear
whether a cash settlement of such forward sale agreement would also qualify for such exemption. In the event that the Company recognizes a significant
gain from the cash settlement of a forward sale agreement, the Company might not be able to satisfy the gross income requirements applicable to REITs
under the Code. In the event that the Company is required to make a significant payment in cash to settle a forward sale agreement, the Company might not
be able to satisfy the distribution requirements applicable to REITs under the Code, absent additional debt or equity financing. While the Company would
not anticipate electing the cash settlement option under any forward sale agreement, such a cash settlement election could result in the Company’s failure to
satisfy the REIT income tests or distribution requirements. In that case, the Company may be able to rely upon the relief provisions under the Code in order
to avoid the loss of the Company’s REIT status. In the event that these relief provisions were not available, the Company could lose its REIT status under
the Code.

Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it may be required to pay certain taxes.

Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including
taxes  on  any  undistributed  income,  taxes  on  income  from  some  activities  conducted  as  a  result  of  a  foreclosure  and  state  or  local  income,  franchise,
property and transfer taxes, including mortgage recording taxes. In addition, the Company may hold some of its assets through taxable REIT subsidiary
(“TRS”)  corporations. Any  TRSs  or  other  taxable  corporations  in  which  the  Company  owns  an  interest  will  be  subject  to  U.S.  federal,  state  and  local
corporate  taxes.  Furthermore,  the  Company  has  entered  into  certain  transactions  in  which  the  Company  has  acquired  target  entities  in  tax-deferred
transactions. To the extent that such entities had outstanding U.S. federal income tax or other tax liabilities, the Company would succeed to such liabilities.
Payment of these taxes generally would decrease the cash available for distribution to the Company’s stockholders.

27

 
 
 
 
 
Legislative, regulatory or administrative changes could adversely affect the Company.

The U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations governing REITs and their stockholders, as well as the administrative interpretations of those laws and
regulations, are constantly under review and may be changed at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given as to whether, when,
or in what form, the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to the Company and its stockholders may be enacted. Changes to the U.S. federal income tax
laws and interpretations of U.S. federal tax laws could adversely affect an investment in the Company’s common stock.

In certain circumstances, the Company may be liable for certain tax obligations of certain limited partners.

In certain circumstances, the Company may be liable for certain tax obligations of certain limited partners. The Company has entered into tax protection
agreements under which it has agreed to minimize the tax consequences to certain limited partners resulting from the sale or other disposition of certain of
the  Company’s  assets.  The  obligation  to  indemnify  such  limited  partners  against  adverse  tax  consequences  is  expected  to  continue  until  2027.  The
Company may enter into additional tax protection agreements in the future, which could extend the period of time during which the Company may be liable
for  tax  obligations  of  certain  limited  partners.  During  the  period  of  these  obligations,  the  Company’s  flexibility  to  dispose  of  the  related  assets  will  be
limited. In addition, the amount of any indemnification obligations may be significant.

The Company cannot provide assurance of its ability to pay distributions in the future.

The Company intends to pay quarterly distributions and to make distributions to its stockholders in an amount such that it distributes all or substantially all
of  its  REIT  taxable  income  in  each  year,  subject  to  certain  adjustments.  The  Company’s  ability  to  pay  distributions  may  be  materially  and  adversely
affected  by  a  number  of  factors,  including  the  risk  factors  described  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.  All  distributions  will  be  made,  subject  to
Maryland law (or Delaware law, in the case of distributions by the Operating Partnership), at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors and will
depend  on  the  Company’s  earnings,  its  financial  condition,  any  debt  covenants,  maintenance  of  its  REIT  qualification  and  other  factors  as  its  board  of
directors may deem relevant from time to time. The Company believes that a change in any one of the following factors could materially and adversely
affect its income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, the ability to service its debt obligations, the market price of its common
stock and its ability to pay distributions to its stockholders:

•

•

•

•

•

the profitability of the assets acquired;

the Company’s ability to make profitable acquisitions;

unforeseen expenses that reduce the Company’s cash flow;

defaults in the Company’s asset portfolio or decreases in the value of its portfolio; and

the fact that anticipated operating expense levels may not prove accurate, as actual results may vary from estimates.

The Company cannot provide assurance that it will achieve results that will allow it to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases
in cash distributions in the future. In addition, some of the Company’s distributions may include a return of capital.

The  Company  is  subject  to  certain  state  laws  and  exchange  requirements  relating  to  the  composition  of  its  board  of  directors,  including  recently
enacted diversity and gender quotas.

California has enacted laws requiring public companies headquartered in California to maintain minimum female representation and to maintain minimum
representation from underrepresented communities on their boards of directors. In addition, Nasdaq has enacted certain requirements concerning diversity
on  boards  of  directors.  The  Company  is  in  compliance  with  all  such  requirements.  However,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that  the  composition  of  the
Company’s board will not change in the future or that the Company will be able to recruit, attract and/or retain qualified members of the board and meet
such  requirements  in  the  future,  which  may  cause  certain  investors  to  divert  their  holdings  in  the  Company’s  stock  and  expose  it  to  penalties  and/or
reputational harm. California state court mandated injunctions against the implementation and enforcement of the California laws are currently in place
pending further litigation and the Nasdaq requirements are also being challenged in federal court.

28

 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

The Company maintains its executive office at 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92130.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 94 properties (93 retail and one office) totaling approximately 10.6 million square feet of
gross leasable area. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s retail portfolio was approximately 98.1% leased. During the year ended December 31, 2022,
the Company leased or renewed a total of approximately 1.6 million square feet in its portfolio. The Company has committed approximately $22.3 million,
or  $50.10  per  square  foot,  in  tenant  improvements,  including  building  and  site  improvements,  for  new  leases  that  occurred  during  the  year  ended
December 31, 2022. The Company has committed approximately $1.2 million, or $2.66 per square foot, in leasing commissions, for the new leases that
occurred during the year ended December 31, 2022. Additionally, the Company has committed approximately $1.1 million, or $0.98 per square foot, in
tenant improvements for renewed leases that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2022. Leasing commission commitments for renewed leases
were not material for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s retail properties as of December 31, 2022:

Property

Los Angeles metro area

Paramount Plaza
Claremont Promenade
Gateway Village
Seabridge Marketplace
Glendora Shopping Center
Redondo Beach Plaza
Diamond Bar Town Center
Diamond Hills Plaza

Plaza de la Cañada

Fallbrook Shopping Center
Moorpark Town Center
Ontario Plaza
Park Oaks Shopping Center

Warner Plaza

Magnolia Shopping Center
Casitas Plaza Shopping Center

Bouquet Center

Year
Completed/
Renovated

Year
Acquired

Gross
Leasable
Sq. Feet

Number
of
Tenants

% Leased

Annual Base
Rent 

(1)

Principal Tenants

1966/2010
1982/2011
2003/2005
2006
1992/2012
1993/2004
1981
1973/2008

1968/2010
1966/1986/
2003/2015
1984/2014
1999
1959/2005

1974/2017
1962/1972/
1987/2016
1972/1982

1985

2009
2010
2010
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013

2013

2014
2014
2015
2015

2015

2016
2016

2016

2016
2016
2017

95,062 
92,215 
96,959 
98,348 
106,535 
110,509 
100,342 
139,472 

100,425 

755,299 
133,547 
150,149 
110,092 

110,918 

116,089 
105,118 

148,903 

146,444 
52,021 
172,922 

15
22
28
23
22
17
22
42

12

46
22
24
29

66

23
26

28

35
6
28

100.0 % $
87.0 %
96.9 %
95.8 %
97.3 %
100.0 %
99.1 %
99.1 %

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, 99¢ Only Stores,
Rite Aid Pharmacy

2,024 
2,173  Super King Supermarket
2,959  Sprouts Market
1,945  Safeway (Vons) Supermarket
1,502  Albertsons Supermarket
2,415  Safeway (Vons) Supermarket, Petco
2,442  Walmart Neighborhood Market, Crunch Fitness
4,181  H-Mart Supermarket, Planet Fitness

97.3 %

98.8 %
92.6 %
96.4 %
95.7 %

97.9 %

96.8 %
99.2 %

97.3 %

92.0 %
96.2 %
94.0 %

2,634 

Gelson’s Supermarket, TJ Maxx, Rite Aid
Pharmacy
Sprouts Market, Trader Joes, Kroger (Ralph’s)
Supermarket 

13,663 
, TJ Maxx
2,058  Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy
2,421  El Super Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy
2,743  Safeway (Vons) Supermarket, Dollar Tree

(2)

4,601 

Sprouts Market, Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket 
Rite Aid Pharmacy 

(2)

(2)
,

2,356  Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket
1,944  Albertsons Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy

3,804 

Safeway (Vons) Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy,
Ross Dress For Less
Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, Trader Joe’s, Rite
4,694 
Aid Pharmacy, Petco
1,385  Trader Joe’s, Pet Food Express
3,636  Trader Joe’s, Marshall’s, LA Fitness

North Ranch Shopping Center
The Knolls
The Terraces

1977/1990
2000/2016
1958/1970/ 1989

Seattle metro area
Meridian Valley Plaza

1978/2011

2010

51,597 

16

100.0 %

899  Kroger (QFC) Supermarket

29

 
 
 
 
Property

The Market at Lake Stevens

Year
Completed/
Renovated

2000

Canyon Park Shopping Center

1980/2012

Hawks Prairie Shopping Center
The Kress Building

Gateway Shopping Center
Canyon Crossing

1988/2012
1924/2005

2007
2009

2010

2011

2011
2011

2012
2013

Crossroads Shopping Center
Bellevue Marketplace

1962/2004/ 2015
1971/1982/ 2017

2010/2013
2015

Four Corner Square

1983/2015

Bridle Trails Shopping Center
PCC Community Markets Plaza
Highland Hill Shopping Center
North Lynnwood Shopping Center
Stadium Center
Summerwalk Village

1980/1984/ 1987
1981/2007
1956/1989/ 2006
1963/1965/ 2003
1926/2016
2015

South Point Plaza
Olympia West Center
Olympia Square North
Thomas Lake Shopping Center
Ballinger Village

Portland metro area
Happy Valley Town Center
Wilsonville Old Town Square
Cascade Summit Town Square
Heritage Market Center

Division Crossing
Halsey Crossing

Hillsboro Market Center
Robinwood Shopping Center
Tigard Marketplace

Wilsonville Town Center
Tigard Promenade

Sunnyside Village Square
Johnson Creek Center
Rose City Center

Division Center

1986/2008
1980/1995
1988/2022
1998/2013
1960

2007
2011
2000
2000

1992
1992

2002
1980/2012
1988/2005

1991/1996
1996

1997
2003/2009
1993/2012

1987/2014

2015

2016
2017
2017
2017
2018
2019

2021
2021
2022
2022
2022

2010
2010/2012
2010
2010

2010
2010

2011
2013
2014

2014
2015

2015
2015
2016

2017

Year
Acquired

Gross
Leasable
Sq. Feet

Number
of
Tenants

% Leased

Annual Base
Rent 

(1)

Principal Tenants

100.0 %

1,697  Albertsons (Haggen) Supermarket

100.0 %

100.0 %
70.0 %

100.0 %
97.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
97.6 %
100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %
97.7 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

99.1 %
97.7 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

2,656 

1,998 
1,297 

PCC Community Markets, Rite Aid Pharmacy,
Petco
Safeway Supermarket, Dollar Tree, Big Lots, Ace
Hardware
IGA Supermarket, TJMaxx
WinCo Foods 
For Less

, Rite Aid Pharmacy, Ross Dress

(2)

2,672 
2,846  Safeway Supermarket

Kroger (QFC) Supermarket, Dick’s Sporting
Goods, Edgeworks Climbing

12,922 
3,697  Asian Family Market

2,672 

2,461 

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Walgreens,
Johnsons Home & Garden
Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Rite Aid (Bartell)
Pharmacy, Dollar Tree

690  PCC Community Markets

2,991  WinCo Foods, LA Fitness, Dollar Tree, Petco
1,138  Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Dollar Tree
1,097  Thriftway Supermarket

935  Walmart Neighborhood Market

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy,
Hobby Lobby, Pep Boys

2,380 
1,544  Trader Joe’s, Petco
1,126  Albertsons Supermarket, Crunch Fitness
2,013  Albertsons Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy
2,326  Thriftway Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy

4,032  New Seasons Market
1,937  Kroger (Fred Meyer) Supermarket 
2,090  Safeway Supermarket, U.S. Postal Service
1,905  Safeway Supermarket, Dollar Tree

(2)

Rite Aid Pharmacy, Ross Dress For Less, Ace
Hardware

1,332 
1,499  24 Hour Fitness, Dollar Tree

Albertsons Supermarket, Dollar Tree, Ace
Hardware

2,720 
1,154  Walmart Neighborhood Market
2,271  H-Mart Supermarket, Bi-Mart

Safeway Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy, Dollar
Tree

3,060 
1,498  Safeway Supermarket, Petco

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Snap Fitness, Ace
Hardware

1,678 
2,333  Trader Joe’s, Walgreens, Sportsman's Warehouse

833  Safeway Supermarket

100.0 %

2,124 

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Rite Aid Pharmacy,
Petco

74,130 

123,592 

157,529 
74,616 

104,298 
120,398 

473,131 
113,758 

119,531 

110,257 
34,459 
163,926 
63,606 
48,888 
60,343 

189,960 
69,212 
89,884 
111,311 
110,849 

138,397 
49,937 
94,934 
107,468 

103,561 
99,428 

156,021 
70,831 
136,889 

167,829 
88,043 

92,278 
108,588 
60,680 

118,122 

9

24

24
5

20
26

99
20

29

31
1
18
11
7
11

25
7
10
12
21

38
20
27
20

20
19

23
16
19

38
15

14
15
3

26

30

 
 
Property

Riverstone Marketplace
King City Plaza
Powell Valley Junction

San Francisco metro area

Year
Completed/
Renovated

2004
1970/1980/ 1990
1992/2002

Pleasant Hill Marketplace

1980

Pinole Vista Shopping Center

1981/2012

Country Club Gate Center
Marlin Cove Shopping Center
The Village at Novato

Santa Teresa Village
Granada Shopping Center
Country Club Village
North Park Plaza

Winston Manor

Jackson Square

Gateway Centre
Iron Horse Plaza
Monterey Center
Santa Rosa Southside Shopping
Center
Monta Loma Plaza
Canyon Creek Plaza

1974/2012
1972/2001
2006

1979/2013
1962/1994
1995
1997
1977/1988/
2011/2015

1972/1997

1996
1999
2007

1984
1973/2010
2000/2018

Village Oaks Shopping Center

1984

Orange County metro area
Santa Ana Downtown Plaza
Sycamore Creek

Desert Springs Marketplace

1987/2010
2008

1994/2013

Cypress Center West

1970/1978/ 2014

Harbor Place Center
5 Points Plaza
Peninsula Marketplace

1994
1962/2012/ 2015
2000

Fullerton Crossroads
The Village at Nellie Gail Ranch

1977/1997/ 2011
1897/2015

Year
Acquired

Gross
Leasable
Sq. Feet

Number
of
Tenants

% Leased

Annual Base
Rent 

(1)

Principal Tenants

100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %

97.4 %

98.4 %
98.7 %
100.0 %

97.9 %
100.0 %
96.5 %
97.3 %

94.0 %

96.1 %

91.7 %
100.0 %
100.0 %

100.0 %
100.0 %
98.0 %

2,391  Kroger (QFC) Supermarket
1,031  Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Anytime Fitness
1,237  Walmart Neighborhood Market

1,524 

3,156 

Total Wine and More, Buy Buy Baby, Basset
Furniture
Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket,
Planet Fitness
Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket, Rite
Aid Pharmacy

2,406 
2,617  99 Ranch Market

600  Trader Joe’s

Grocery Outlet Supermarket, Dollar Tree, MedVet
Silicon Valley

3,294 
1,544  Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket
2,202  Walmart Neighborhood Market, CVS Pharmacy
2,685  H-Mart Supermarket

1,763  Grocery Outlet Supermarket

2,444 

Safeway Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy, 24 Hour
Fitness
Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket,
2,519 
Walgreens
2,305  Lunardi’s Market
1,091  Trader Joe’s

1,837  REI, Cost Plus World Market, DSW
1,614  Safeway Supermarket
2,152  New Seasons Market

97.9 %

1,442 

Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket, Rite
Aid Pharmacy 

(2)

98.9 %
98.2 %

95.7 %

98.4 %

94.5 %
99.7 %
99.0 %

100.0 %
98.2 %

(2)

2,838 

2,429  Kroger (Food 4 Less) Supermarket, Marshall’s
1,919  Safeway (Vons) Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy 
Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, Rite Aid
Pharmacy
Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, Rite Aid
Pharmacy
AA Supermarket, Ross Dress For Less, AutoZone
Mega Hub

1,784 
4,741  Trader Joe’s
2,515  Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, Planet Fitness

2,170 

Kroger (Ralph’s) Supermarket, Kohl’s, Jo-Ann
Fabrics and Crafts

3,682 
3,100  Smart & Final Extra Supermarket

2017
2018
2022

2010

2011

2011
2012
2012

2012
2013
2013
2014

2015

2015

2015
2015
2016

2017
2017
2021

2022

2010
2010

2011

2012

2012
2013
2013

2017
2017

95,774 
62,676 
108,639 

69,715 

141,093 

109,331 
73,943 
20,081 

131,263 
71,525 
111,093 
76,697 

49,852 

114,220 

112,553 
61,915 
25,626 

88,606 
49,694 
64,662 

79,875 

105,536 
74,198 

113,718 

112,080 

122,636 
161,214 
95,416 

219,899 
89,041 

24
20
10

3

29

33
24
4

38
16
22
17

15

17

21
11
10

10
11
24

18

30
17

20

32

10
39
14

26
24

31

 
 
Property

San Diego metro area

Marketplace Del Rio
Renaissance Towne Centre
Bay Plaza
Bernardo Heights Plaza

Hawthorne Crossings
Creekside Plaza
Palomar Village

Total Properties

_______________

Year
Completed/
Renovated

Year
Acquired

Gross
Leasable
Sq. Feet

Number
of
Tenants

% Leased

Annual Base
Rent 

(1)

Principal Tenants

1990/2004
1991/2011
1986/2013
1983/2006

1993/1999
1993/2005
1989/2019

2011
2011
2012
2013

2013
2014
2021

183,787 
52,866 
73,324 
37,729 

141,288 
133,914 
125,130 

44
30
30
5

20
26
29

95.7  %
98.2  %
98.0  %
100.0  %

100.0  %
97.9  %
98.4  %

Stater Brothers Supermarket, Walgreens, Planet
3,594 
Fitness
2,696  CVS Pharmacy
2,268  Seafood City Supermarket

985  Sprouts Market

Mitsuwa Supermarket, Ross Dress For Less,
Staples

3,554 
3,367  Stater Brothers Supermarket, AMC Theatres
2,130  Albertsons Supermarket, CVS Pharmacy

10,560,259 

2,048

98.1 % $

233,729 

(1) Annual base rent (“ABR”) is equal to the annualized cash rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2022 (including initial cash rent for new

leases).

(2) Retailer is not a tenant of the Company.

As illustrated by the following tables, the Company’s shopping centers are substantially diversified by both tenant mix and by the staggering of its major
tenant lease expirations. For the year ended December 31, 2022, no single tenant comprised more than 5.7% of the total annual base rent of the Company’s
portfolio.

The following table sets forth a summary schedule of the Company’s ten largest tenants by percent of total annual base rent, as of December 31, 2022:

Tenant
Albertsons / Safeway Supermarkets
Kroger Supermarkets
Rite Aid Pharmacy
Save Mart Supermarkets
Trader Joe’s
Grocery Outlet Supermarkets
JP Morgan Chase
Sprouts Markets
H-Mart Supermarkets
Marshall’s / TJMaxx

___________________

Number of Leases % of Total ABR 

(1)

21 
11 
16 
5 
9 
10 
21 
4 
3 
5 
105 

5.7  %
3.2  %
1.7  %
1.5  %
1.4  %
1.3  %
1.3  %
1.2  %
1.1  %
1.1  %
19.5 %

(1) ABR is equal to the annualized cash rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2022 (including initial cash rent for new leases).

32

 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  table  sets  forth  a  summary  schedule  of  the  annual  lease  expirations  for  leases  in  place  across  the  Company’s  total  retail  portfolio  at
December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands):

Year of Expiration
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
Thereafter

Total

___________________

Number of
Leases
Expiring 

(1)

Leased Square
Footage

ABR 

(2)

% of Total ABR

282 
310 
298 
301 
300 
174 
76 
58 
69 
72 
108 
2,048 

859,159  $

1,140,492 
1,344,776 
1,413,335 
1,151,001 
1,354,128 
661,918 
409,444 
541,583 
443,020 
1,034,914 
10,353,770  $

24,088 
28,611 
29,825 
30,516 
27,460 
27,980 
13,554 
9,379 
11,245 
10,180 
20,891 
233,729 

10.3  %
12.2  %
12.8  %
13.1  %
11.8  %
11.9  %
5.8  %
4.0  %
4.9  %
4.3  %
8.9  %
100 %

(1) Assumes no tenants exercise renewal options or cancellation options.
(2) ABR is equal to the annualized cash rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2022 (including initial cash rent for new leases). 

The  following  table  sets  forth  a  summary  schedule  of  the  annual  lease  expirations  for  leases  in  place  with  the  Company’s  retail  anchor  tenants  at
December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands). Anchor tenants are tenants with leases occupying at least 15,000 square feet or more.

Year of Expiration
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
Thereafter

Total

____________________

Number of
Leases
Expiring 

(1)

Leased Square
Footage

ABR 

(2)

% of Total ABR

13 
14 
22 
24 
14 
27 
13 
7 
10 
7 
22 
173 

393,214  $
496,577 
724,936 
784,371 
460,659 
947,961 
463,575 
242,126 
336,035 
236,380 
744,966 
5,830,800  $

7,720 
7,997 
10,256 
10,203 
5,364 
15,064 
7,301 
3,828 
5,047 
3,463 
11,687 
87,930 

3.3  %
3.4  %
4.4  %
4.4  %
2.3  %
6.4  %
3.1  %
1.6  %
2.2  %
1.5  %
5.0  %
37.6 %

(1) Assumes no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options.
(2) ABR is equal to the annualized cash rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2022 (including initial cash rent for new leases). 

33

 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  from  time  to  time,  the  Company  is  involved  in  routine  legal  actions  incidental  to  its  business  of  the  ownership  and
operations of its properties. In management’s opinion, the liabilities, if any, that ultimately may result from such legal actions are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

ROIC Market Information

ROIC’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “ROIC”.

Holders

As of February 9, 2023, ROIC had 63 registered holders. Such information was obtained through the registrar and transfer agent.

Operating Partnership

As of December 31, 2022, the Operating Partnership had 49 registered holders, including Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC.

34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholder Return Performance

The above graph compares the cumulative total return on the Company’s common stock with that of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“S&P 500”)
and  the  National  Association  of  Real  Estate  Investment  Trusts  Equity  Index  (“FTSE  NAREIT  Equity  REITs”)  from  December  31,  2017  through
December 31, 2022. The stock price performance graph assumes that an investor invested $100 in each of ROIC and the indices, and the reinvestment of
any  dividends.  The  comparisons  in  the  graph  are  provided  in  accordance  with  the  SEC  disclosure  requirements  and  are  not  intended  to  forecast  or  be
indicative of the future performance of ROIC’s shares of common stock.

Index
Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.
S&P 500
FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs

12/31/2017

12/31/2018

12/31/2019

12/31/2020

12/31/2021

12/31/2022

$
$
$

100.00  $
100.00  $
100.00  $

83.06  $
95.62  $
95.96  $

96.64  $
125.72  $
123.46  $

74.44  $
148.85  $
117.14  $

112.13  $
191.58  $
165.51  $

88.99 
156.88 
124.22 

Period Ending

Except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, the foregoing Stockholder Return Performance information
shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under
the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act. This information shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

35

 
 
 
 
 
Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The  following  discussion  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  and  Notes
thereto  appearing  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.  The  Company  makes  statements  in  this  section  that  are  forward-looking  statements
within  the  meaning  of  the  federal  securities  laws.  For  a  complete  discussion  of  forward-looking  statements,  see  the  section  in  this  Annual  Report  on
Form 10-K entitled “Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information.” Certain risk factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to
differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K entitled “Risk Factors.”

Overview

The Company is organized in an UpREIT format pursuant to which Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, its wholly-owned subsidiary, serves as the
general partner of, and ROIC conducts substantially all of its business through, its operating partnership, Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a
Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), together with its subsidiaries.

ROIC commenced operations in October 2009 as a fully integrated and self-managed REIT, and as of December 31, 2022, ROIC owned an approximate
93.6%  partnership  interest  and  other  limited  partners  owned  the  remaining  approximate  6.4%  partnership  interest  in  the  Operating  Partnership.  ROIC
specializes  in  the  acquisition,  ownership  and  management  of  necessity-based  community  and  neighborhood  shopping  centers  on  the  west  coast  of  the
United States, anchored by supermarkets and drugstores.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 94 properties (93 retail and one office) totaling approximately 10.6 million square feet of
GLA. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s retail portfolio was approximately 98.1% leased. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company
leased and renewed approximately 446,000 and 1.2 million square feet, respectively, in its portfolio.

The table below provides a reconciliation of beginning of year vacant space to end of year vacant space for its retail portfolio as of December 31, 2022:

Vacant space at December 31, 2021
Square footage vacated
Vacant space in acquired properties
Square footage leased

Vacant space at December 31, 2022

Vacant Space Square
Footage

249,108 
151,851 
19,514 
(224,125)
196,348 

The Company has committed approximately $22.3 million, or $50.10 per square foot, in tenant improvements, including building and site improvements,
for new leases that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company has committed approximately $1.2 million, or $2.66 per square foot,
in  leasing  commissions  for  the  new  leases  that  occurred  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  Additionally,  the  Company  has  committed
approximately  $1.1  million,  or  $0.98  per  square  foot,  in  tenant  improvements,  including  building  and  site  improvements,  for  the  renewed  leases  that
occurred  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022.  Leasing  commission  commitments  for  renewed  leases  were  not  material  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2022.

Impact of COVID-19

Certain of the Company’s tenants experienced economic difficulties as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Company received a number of rent
relief requests from tenants, most often in the form of rent deferral requests. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company entered into lease
concessions  that  deferred  approximately  $10.9  million  of  contractual  amounts  billed.  As  of  December  31,  2022,  approximately  $9.5  million  of  such
deferral amounts have been rebilled in accordance with the underlying agreements, of which approximately $8.5 million, or approximately 89.7%, has been
collected. The Company evaluated rent relief requests on a case-by-case basis and not all tenant requests resulted in concession agreements, nor did the
Company forego its contractual rights under its lease agreements. See Note 1 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion on
how the Company accounts for COVID-19 related rent concessions.

36

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results of Operations

At December 31, 2022, the Company had 94 properties (93 retail and one office), all of which are consolidated in the accompanying financial statements.
The  Company  believes,  because  the  properties  are  located  in  densely  populated  areas  and  are  leased  to  retailers  that  provide  necessity-based,  non-
discretionary goods and services, the nature of its investments provides for relatively stable revenue flows. The Company has a strong capital structure with
manageable  debt  as  of  December  31,  2022.  The  Company  expects  to  continue  to  actively  explore  acquisition  opportunities  consistent  with  its  business
strategy.

Property  operating  income  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure  of  performance.  The  Company  defines  property  operating  income  as  operating  revenues
(rental  revenue  and  other  income),  less  property  and  related  expenses  (property  operating  expenses  and  property  taxes).  Property  operating  income
excludes general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, acquisition transaction costs, other expense, interest expense, gains and losses
from property acquisitions and dispositions, equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures, and extraordinary items. Other REITs may use different
methodologies  for  calculating  property  operating  income,  and  accordingly,  the  Company’s  property  operating  income  may  not  be  comparable  to  other
REITs.

Property operating income is used by management to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties, to determine trends in
earnings and to compute the fair value of the Company’s properties as this measure is not affected by the cost of the Company’s funding, the impact of
depreciation and amortization expenses, gains or losses from the acquisition and sale of operating real estate assets, general and administrative expenses or
other gains and losses that relate to the ownership of its properties. The Company believes the exclusion of these items from net income is useful because
the  resulting  measure  captures  the  actual  revenue  generated  and  actual  expenses  incurred  in  operating  the  Company’s  properties  as  well  as  trends  in
occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.

Property operating income is a measure of the operating performance of the Company’s properties but does not measure the Company’s performance as a
whole. Property operating income is therefore not a substitute for net income or operating income as computed in accordance with GAAP.

For the Company’s discussion related to the results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for fiscal year 2020, including certain comparisons of
results for fiscal year 2021 to fiscal year 2020, please refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in its fiscal 2021 Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2022.

Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.

Property Operating Income

The table below provides a reconciliation of consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP to consolidated property operating income for the
years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Operating income per GAAP
Plus:

Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative expenses
Other expense
Gain on sale of real estate

Less:

Property operating income

Year Ended December 31,
2021
2022

$

$

114,685  $
97,494 
21,735 
960 
(7,653)
227,221  $

114,895 
92,929 
19,654 
860 
(22,340)
205,998 

The following comparison for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, makes reference to the effect of the
same-center  properties.  Same-center  properties,  which  totaled  84  of  the  Company’s  94  properties  as  of  December  31,  2022,  represent  all  operating
properties  owned  by  the  Company  during  the  entirety  of  both  periods  presented  and  consolidated  into  the  Company’s  financial  statements  during  such
periods, except for the Company’s corporate office headquarters.

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The table below provides a reconciliation of consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP to property operating income for the year ended
December 31, 2022 related to the 84 same-center properties owned by the Company during the entirety of both the years ended December 31, 2022 and
2021 and consolidated into the Company’s financial statements during such periods (in thousands):

Operating income (loss) per GAAP
Plus:

Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative expenses 
Other expense 
Gain on sale of real estate

(1)

(1)

Less:

Property operating income

______________________

Same-Center

Year Ended December 31, 2022
Non Same-Center

Total

$

$

121,075  $
88,014 
— 
— 
— 
209,089  $

(6,390) $
9,480 
21,735 
960 
(7,653)
18,132  $

114,685 
97,494 
21,735 
960 
(7,653)
227,221 

(1) For illustration purposes, general and administrative expenses and other expense are included in non same-center because the Company does not

allocate these types of expenses between same-center and non same-center properties.

The table below provides a reconciliation of consolidated operating income in accordance with GAAP to property operating income for the year ended
December 31, 2021 related to the 84 same-center properties owned by the Company during the entirety of both the years ended December 31, 2022 and
2021 and consolidated into the Company’s financial statements during such periods (in thousands):

Operating income per GAAP
Plus: Depreciation and amortization

General and administrative expenses 
Other expense 

(1)

(1)

Less: Gain on sale of real estate

Property operating income

______________________

Same-Center

Year Ended December 31, 2021
Non Same-Center

Total

$

$

109,657  $
88,288 
— 
— 
— 
197,945  $

5,238  $
4,641 
19,654 
860 
(22,340)

8,053  $

114,895 
92,929 
19,654 
860 
(22,340)
205,998 

(1) For illustration purposes, general and administrative expenses and other expense are included in non same-center because the Company does not

allocate these types of expenses between same-center and non same-center properties.

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  the  Company  generated  property  operating  income  of  approximately  $227.2  million  compared  to  property
operating  income  of  $206.0  million  generated  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  representing  an  increase  of  approximately  $21.2  million.  The
property operating income for the 84 same-center properties increased approximately $11.1 million primarily due to an increase in base rents and straight-
line rents as a result of an increase in occupancy and re-leasing spreads in the year ended December 31, 2022. The property operating income for the non
same-center  properties  increased  approximately  $10.1  million  primarily  due  to  the  net  increase  in  the  number  of  properties  the  Company  owned  as  of
December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021.

Depreciation and amortization

The  Company  incurred  depreciation  and  amortization  expenses  of  approximately  $97.5  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022  compared  to
$92.9  million  incurred  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021.  Depreciation  expense  increased  approximately  $4.6  million  primarily  due  to  the  net
increase in the number of properties the Company owned as of December 31, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021.

38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses

The Company incurred general and administrative expenses of approximately $21.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $19.7
million incurred during the year ended December 31, 2021. General and administrative expenses increased approximately $2.1 million primarily as a result
of an increase in compensation-related and leasing-related expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Gain on sale of real estate

On  August  19,  2022,  in  connection  with  the  acquisitions  of  Ballinger  Village  and  Thomas  Lake  Shopping  Center,  the  Company  sold  Aurora  Square,  a
shopping  center  located  in  Shoreline,  Washington.  The  sales  price  of  $36.2  million,  less  costs  to  sell,  resulted  in  net  proceeds  of  approximately  $34.4
million.  The  Company  recorded  a  gain  on  sale  of  real  estate  of  approximately  $7.7  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022  related  to  this
property disposition. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold three properties. The total sales price of approximately $69.7 million,
less  costs  to  sell,  resulted  in  net  proceeds  of  approximately  $68.0  million.  The  Company  recorded  gains  on  sale  of  real  estate  of  approximately  $22.3
million during the year ended December 31, 2021 related to these property dispositions.

Interest expense and other finance expenses

The Company incurred approximately $59.2 million of interest expense and other finance expenses during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to
approximately $57.5 million incurred during the year ended December 31, 2021. Interest expense and other finance expenses increased approximately $1.7
million primarily due to the increase in interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2022 as well as an increase in borrowings on the credit facility
when  compared  to  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021.  The  U.S.  Federal  Reserve  raised  the  federal  funds  rate  multiple  times  during  the  year  ended
December 31, 2022 and market interest rates have increased significantly. It is expected that the U.S. Federal Reserve may continue to increase the federal
funds rate during 2023. Should the U.S. Federal Reserve continue to raise rates in the future, this will likely result in further increases in market interest
rates.  Accordingly,  the  Company  anticipates  an  increase  in  interest  expense  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2023  compared  to  the  year  ended
December 31, 2022.

Funds From Operations

Funds from operations (“FFO”), is a widely-recognized non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that the Company believes when considered with financial
statements  presented  in  accordance  with  GAAP,  provides  additional  and  useful  means  to  assess  its  financial  performance.  FFO  is  frequently  used  by
securities  analysts,  investors  and  other  interested  parties  to  evaluate  the  performance  of  REITs,  most  of  which  present  FFO  along  with  net  income  as
calculated in accordance with GAAP.

The  Company  computes  FFO  in  accordance  with  the  “White  Paper”  on  FFO  published  by  the  National  Association  of  Real  Estate  Investment  Trusts
(“NAREIT”), which defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains or losses
from debt restructuring, sales of depreciable property, and impairments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for
partnerships and unconsolidated joint ventures.

However, FFO:

• does  not  represent  cash  flows  from  operating  activities  in  accordance  with  GAAP  (which,  unlike  FFO,  generally  reflects  all  cash  effects  of
transactions and other events in the determination of net income); and

• should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company’s performance.

FFO as defined by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled items reported by other REITs due to possible differences in the application of
the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

39

 
 
 
 
 
 
The table below provides a reconciliation of net income applicable to stockholders in accordance with GAAP to FFO for the years ended December 31,
2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Net income attributable to ROIC

Plus:  Depreciation and amortization
Less: Gain on sale of real estate

Funds from operations – basic

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Funds from operations – diluted

Cash Net Operating Income (“NOI”)

Year Ended December 31,
2021
2022

$

$

51,869  $
97,494 
(7,653)
141,710 
3,591 
145,301  $

53,508 
92,929 
(22,340)
124,097 
3,852 
127,949 

Cash NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure of the Company’s performance. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is operating income.
The Company defines cash NOI as operating revenues (rental revenue and other income), less property and related expenses (property operating expenses
and property taxes), adjusted for non-cash revenue and operating expense items such as straight-line rent and amortization of lease intangibles, debt-related
expenses, and other adjustments. Cash NOI also excludes general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, acquisition transaction costs,
other expense, interest expense, gains and losses from property acquisitions and dispositions, equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures, and
extraordinary  items.  Other  REITs  may  use  different  methodologies  for  calculating  cash  NOI,  and  accordingly,  the  Company’s  cash  NOI  may  not  be
comparable to other REITs.

Cash NOI is used by management internally to evaluate and compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties. The Company believes cash
NOI  provides  useful  information  to  investors  regarding  the  Company’s  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  because  it  reflects  only  those  cash
income and expense items that are incurred at the property level, and when compared across periods, can be used to determine trends in earnings of the
Company’s properties as this measure is not affected by non-cash revenue and expense recognition items, the cost of the Company’s funding, the impact of
depreciation and amortization expenses, gains or losses from the acquisition and sale of operating real estate assets, general and administrative expenses or
other gains and losses that relate to the Company’s ownership of properties. The Company believes the exclusion of these items from operating income is
useful because the resulting measure captures the actual revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating the Company’s properties as well as
trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.

Cash NOI is a measure of the operating performance of the Company’s properties but does not measure the Company’s performance as a whole and is
therefore not a substitute for net income or operating income as computed in accordance with GAAP.

40

 
 
 
 
 
 
Same-Center Cash NOI

The  table  below  provides  a  reconciliation  of  same-center  cash  NOI  to  consolidated  operating  income  in  accordance  with  GAAP  for  the  years  ended
December  31,  2022  and  2021.  The  table  makes  reference  to  the  effect  of  the  same-center  properties.  Same-center  properties,  which  totaled  84  of  the
Company’s 94 properties as of December 31, 2022, represent all operating properties owned by the Company during the entirety of both periods presented
and consolidated into the Company’s financial statements during such periods, except for the Company’s corporate office headquarters (in thousands):

GAAP operating income

Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative expenses
Other expense
Gain on sale of real estate
Straight-line rent
Amortization of above- and below-market rent
Property revenues and other expenses 

(1)

Total Company cash NOI

Non same-center cash NOI

Same-center cash NOI

______________________

Year Ended December 31,
2021
2022

$

$

114,685  $
97,494 
21,735 
960 
(7,653)
(2,715)
(11,947)
(1,331)
211,228 
(14,545)
196,683  $

114,895 
92,929 
19,654 
860 
(22,340)
(959)
(8,795)
(614)
195,630 
(7,574)
188,056 

(1) Includes  anchor  lease  termination  fees,  net  of  contractual  amounts,  if  any,  expense  and  recovery  adjustments  related  to  prior  periods  and  other

miscellaneous adjustments.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company generated same-center cash NOI of approximately $196.7 million compared to same-center cash
NOI of approximately $188.1 million generated during the year ended December 31, 2021, representing a 4.6% increase. This increase is primarily due to
an  increase  in  base  rents  driven  by  contractual  rent  increases  and  an  increase  in  occupancy  and  re-leasing  spreads  during  the  year  ended  December  31,
2022.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting estimates are those that are both important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require
management’s most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting estimates that management believes are
critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of the
Company’s accounting policies included in Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The  Company  records  base  rents  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  term  of  each  lease.  The  excess  of  rents  recognized  over  amounts  contractually  due
pursuant  to  the  underlying  leases  is  included  in  Tenant  and  other  receivables  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets.  Most  leases  contain
provisions that require tenants to reimburse a pro-rata share of real estate taxes and certain common area expenses. Adjustments are also made throughout
the year to tenant and other receivables and the related cost recovery income based upon the Company’s best estimate of the final amounts to be billed and
collected.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  is  established  based  on  a  quarterly  analysis  of  the  risk  of  loss  on  specific  accounts. The  analysis  places  particular
emphasis on past-due accounts and considers information such as the nature and age of the receivables, tenant creditworthiness, current economic trends,
including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tenants’ businesses, the payment history of the tenants or other debtors, the financial condition of the
tenants and any guarantors and management’s assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related
negotiations, among other things. Management’s estimates of the required allowance are subject to revision as these factors change and are sensitive to the
effects of economic and market conditions on tenants, particularly those at retail

41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
properties. Estimates are used to establish reimbursements from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate tax and insurance costs. The Company
analyzes  the  balance  of  its  estimated  accounts  receivable  for  real  estate  taxes,  common  area  maintenance  and  insurance  for  each  of  its  properties  by
comparing actual recoveries versus actual expenses and any actual write-offs. Based on its analysis, the Company may record an additional amount in its
allowance for doubtful accounts related to these items. In addition, the Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses in connection with the
deferred straight-line rent receivable.

Real Estate Investments

Land,  buildings,  property  improvements,  furniture/fixtures  and  tenant  improvements  are  recorded  at  cost.  Expenditures  for  maintenance  and  repairs  are
charged to operations as incurred. Renovations and/or replacements, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over its
estimated useful lives.

The Company recognizes the acquisition of real estate properties, including acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements) and
acquired  intangible  assets  and  liabilities  (consisting  of  above-market  and  below-market  leases  and  acquired  in-place  leases)  at  their  fair  value  (for
acquisitions meeting the definition of a business) and relative fair value (for acquisitions not meeting the definition of a business). Acquired lease intangible
assets  include  above-market  leases  and  acquired  in-place  leases,  and  Acquired  lease  intangible  liabilities  represent  below-market  leases  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were
vacant,  which  value  is  then  allocated  to  land,  buildings  and  improvements  based  on  management’s  determination  of  the  relative  fair  values  of  these
assets. In valuing an acquired property’s intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up
periods  and  estimates  of  lost  rental  revenue  during  the  expected  lease-up  periods  based  on  its  evaluation  of  current  market  demand.  Management  also
estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.

The value of in-place leases is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental
rates, over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if it were vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present
value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received
and  management’s  estimate  of  market  lease  rates,  measured  over  the  terms  of  the  respective  leases  that  management  deemed  appropriate  at  the  time  of
acquisition. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair
values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company’s experience and the relevant facts and circumstances
that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The value of the above-market and below-market leases associated with the original lease term is amortized to
rental income, over the terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the
respective  leases.  If  a  lease  were  to  be  terminated  prior  to  its  stated  expiration,  all  unamortized  amounts  relating  to  that  lease  would  be  recognized  in
operations at that time.

The  Company  is  required  to  make  subjective  assessments  as  to  the  useful  life  of  its  properties  for  purposes  of  determining  the  amount  of
depreciation. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income.

Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Buildings
Property Improvements
Furniture/Fixtures
Tenant Improvements

Asset Impairment

39-40 years
10-20 years
3-10 years
Shorter of lease term or its useful life

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to aggregate future net cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to be generated by the asset. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based
on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, legal and environmental concerns, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset,
as well as any significant cost overruns on development properties. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is

42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
measured  by  the  amount  by  which  the  carrying  amount  of  the  assets  exceed  the  fair  value.  Management  does  not  believe  that  the  value  of  any  of  the
Company’s real estate investments was impaired at December 31, 2022.

REIT Qualification Requirements

The Company has elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, and believes that it has been organized and has operated in a manner that
will allow it to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code.

The Company is subject to a number of operational and organizational requirements to qualify and then maintain qualification as a REIT. If the Company
does  not  qualify  as  a  REIT,  its  income  would  become  subject  to  U.S.  federal,  state  and  local  income  taxes  at  regular  corporate  rates  that  would  be
substantial and the Company may not be permitted to re-elect to qualify as a REIT for four taxable years following the year that it failed to qualify as a
REIT. The Company’s results of operations, liquidity and amounts distributable to stockholders would be significantly reduced if it failed to qualify as a
REIT.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company

In this “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company” section and in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership” section, the
term “the Company” refers to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. on an unconsolidated basis, excluding the Operating Partnership.

The Company’s business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership, of which the Company is the parent company, and which it consolidates
for financial reporting purposes. Because the Company operates on a consolidated basis with the Operating Partnership, the section entitled “Liquidity and
Capital  Resources  of  the  Operating  Partnership”  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  this  section  to  understand  the  liquidity  and  capital  resources  of  the
Company on a consolidated basis and how the Company is operated as a whole.

The Company issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring
certain  expenses  in  operating  as  a  public  company.  The  Company  itself  does  not  hold  any  indebtedness  other  than  guarantees  of  indebtedness  of  the
Operating Partnership, and its only material assets are its ownership of direct or indirect partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and membership
interest in Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the consolidated assets and liabilities
and the consolidated revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. However,
all  debt  is  held  directly  or  indirectly  by  the  Operating  Partnership.  The  Company’s  principal  funding  requirement  is  the  payment  of  dividends  on  its
common stock. The Company’s principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.

As  the  parent  company  of  the  Operating  Partnership,  the  Company,  indirectly,  has  the  full,  exclusive  and  complete  responsibility  for  the  Operating
Partnership’s day-to-day management and control. The Company causes the Operating Partnership to distribute such portion of its available cash as the
Company may in its discretion determine, in the manner provided in the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement.

The  Company  is  a  well-known  seasoned  issuer  with  an  effective  shelf  registration  statement  filed  in  April  2022  that  allows  the  Company  to  register
unspecified various classes of debt and equity securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue equity from time to time on an opportunistic
basis,  dependent  upon  market  conditions  and  available  pricing.  Any  proceeds  from  such  equity  issuances  would  be  contributed  to  the  Operating
Partnership. The Operating Partnership may use the proceeds to acquire additional properties, pay down debt, and for general working capital purposes.

Liquidity  is  a  measure  of  the  Company’s  ability  to  meet  potential  cash  requirements,  including  ongoing  commitments  to  repay  borrowings,  fund  and
maintain its assets and operations, make distributions to its stockholders and meet other general business needs. The liquidity of the Company is dependent
on the Operating Partnership’s ability to make sufficient distributions to the Company. The primary cash requirement of the Company is its payment of
dividends to its stockholders.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company’s primary sources of cash were distributions from the Operating Partnership and proceeds from
the issuance of common stock. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has determined that it has adequate working capital to meet its dividend funding
obligations for the next twelve months.

On February 20, 2020, ROIC entered into an “at the market” sales agreement, as amended on April 27, 2022 (the “Sales Agreement”), with each of (i)
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BTIG, LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James &

43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Associates, Inc., Regions Securities LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “Agents”) and (ii) the
Forward Purchasers (as defined below), pursuant to which ROIC may sell, from time to time, shares (any such shares, the “Primary Shares”) of ROIC’s
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), to or through the Agents and instruct certain of the Agents, acting as forward sellers (the
“Forward Sellers”), to offer and sell borrowed shares (any such shares, “Forward Hedge Shares,” and collectively with the Primary Shares, the “Shares”)
with the Shares to be sold under the Sales Agreement having an aggregate offering price of up to $500.0 million.

The Sales Agreement contemplates that, in addition to the issuance and sale of Primary Shares to or through the Agents as principal or its sales agents,
ROIC may enter into separate forward sale agreements with any of KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC or their
respective affiliates (in such capacity, the “Forward Purchasers”). If ROIC enters into a forward sale agreement with any Forward Purchaser, ROIC expects
that such Forward Purchaser or its affiliate will borrow from third parties and, through the relevant Forward Seller, sell a number of Forward Hedge Shares
equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward sale agreement, in accordance with the mutually accepted instructions
related to such forward sale agreement. ROIC will not initially receive any proceeds from any sale of Forward Hedge Shares through a Forward Seller.
ROIC  expects  to  fully  physically  settle  each  particular  forward  sale  agreement  with  the  relevant  Forward  Purchaser  on  one  or  more  dates  specified  by
ROIC on or prior to the maturity date of that particular forward sale agreement by issuing shares of Common Stock (the “Confirmation Shares”), in which
case ROIC expects to receive aggregate net cash proceeds at settlement equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward
sale  agreement  multiplied  by  the  relevant  forward  sale  price.  However,  ROIC  may  also  elect  to  cash  settle  or  net  share  settle  a  particular  forward  sale
agreement, in which case ROIC may not receive any proceeds from the issuance of shares of Common Stock, and ROIC will instead receive or pay cash (in
the case of cash settlement) or receive or deliver shares of Common Stock (in the case of net share settlement).

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  ROIC  sold  a  total  of  1,288,213  shares  under  the  Sales  Agreement,  which  resulted  in  gross  proceeds  of
approximately $25.2 million and commissions of approximately $252,000 paid to the Agents. The Company intends to use the net proceeds for general
corporate purposes, which may include, among other things, the funding of acquisitions and additions to working capital.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, dividends paid and payable to stockholders totaled approximately $92.4 million. Additionally, for the year ended
December 31, 2022, distributions paid and payable from the Operating Partnership to the non-controlling interest OP Unitholders totaled approximately
$6.6  million.  On  a  consolidated  basis,  cash  flows  from  operations  for  the  same  period  totaled  approximately  $149.0  million.  For  the  year  ended
December 31, 2021, dividends paid and payable to stockholders totaled approximately $62.2 million. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2021,
distributions  paid  and  payable  from  the  Operating  Partnership  to  the  non-controlling  interest  OP  Unitholders  totaled  approximately  $4.7  million.  On  a
consolidated basis, cash flows from operations for the same period totaled approximately $136.3 million.

Potential future sources of capital include equity issuances and distributions from the Operating Partnership.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership

In this “Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership” section, the terms the “Operating Partnership,” “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the
Operating Partnership together with its consolidated subsidiaries or the Operating Partnership and the Company together with their respective consolidated
subsidiaries, as the context requires.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Operating Partnership’s primary source of cash was cash flow from operations, proceeds from borrowings
under its credit facility, proceeds from the sale of real estate and cash contributed by ROIC from the issuance of common stock. As of December 31, 2022,
the  Operating  Partnership  has  determined  that  it  has  adequate  working  capital  to  meet  its  debt  obligations  and  operating  expenses  for  the  next  twelve
months.

The Operating Partnership has an unsecured term loan agreement with several banks under which the lenders agreed to provide a $300.0 million unsecured
term loan facility. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership entered into the First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Term Loan
Agreement  (as  amended,  the  “Term  Loan  Agreement”)  pursuant  to  which  the  maturity  date  of  the  term  loan  was  extended  from  September  8,  2022  to
January 20, 2025, without further options for extension. The Term Loan Agreement also provides that the Operating Partnership may from time to time
request increased aggregate commitments of $200.0 million under certain conditions set forth in the Term Loan Agreement, including the consent of the
lenders for the additional commitments. Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to
an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) a

44

 
 
 
 
LIBOR  rate  determined  by  reference  to  the  cost  of  funds  for  U.S.  dollar  deposits  for  the  relevant  period  (the  “Eurodollar  Rate”),  or  (ii)  a  base  rate
determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by the Administrative Agent as its “prime
rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%.

The Operating Partnership has an unsecured revolving credit facility with several banks. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership entered
into  the  First  Amendment  to  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement  (as  amended,  the  “Credit  Facility  Agreement”)  pursuant  to  which  the
borrowing capacity under the credit facility is $600.0 million and the maturity date of the credit facility was extended from September 8, 2021 to February
20, 2024, with two six-month extension options, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions including the
payment of extension fees. Additionally, the Credit Facility Agreement contains an accordion feature, which allows the Operating Partnership to increase
the borrowing capacity under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $1.2 billion, subject to lender consents and other conditions. Borrowings under the
Credit Facility Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the
Company, plus, as applicable, (i) the Eurodollar Rate, or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b)
the rate of interest announced by KeyBank, National Association as its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 0.90%. Additionally, the Operating
Partnership is obligated to pay a facility fee at a rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, currently 0.20%, and a fronting fee at a rate of 0.125%
per year with respect to each letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility Agreement, of which the Operating Partnership had none outstanding as of
December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, $300.0 million and $88.0 million were outstanding under the term loan and credit facility, respectively. The weighted average
interest rates on the term loan and the credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2022 were 2.7% and 3.1%, respectively. As discussed in Note 11
of  the  accompanying  financial  statements,  the  Operating  Partnership  has  historically  used  interest  rate  swaps  to  help  manage  its  interest  rate  risk.  The
Company’s four interest rate swaps matured effective August 31, 2022, and accordingly the interest rate on the term loan was no longer effectively fixed
and outstanding borrowings under the term loan became subject to a variable interest rate, as detailed above, effective September 1, 2022. The Operating
Partnership had no available borrowings under the term loan at December 31, 2022. The Operating Partnership had $512.0 million available to borrow
under the credit facility at December 31, 2022.

Further, the Operating Partnership issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes in each of December 2017, December 2014
and December 2013 and $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes in September 2016, (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) each of
which were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

The key terms of the Operating Partnership’s Senior Notes are as follows:

Senior Notes

Senior Notes Due 2027

Senior Notes Due 2026

Senior Notes Due 2024

Senior Notes Due 2023

$

$

$

$

Aggregate
Principal
Amount (in
thousands)

Issue Date and
Interest Accrual Date

Maturity Date

Contractual
Interest Rate

First Interest
Payment

250,000 

December 15, 2017

December 15, 2027

4.19 %

June 15, 2018

200,000 

September 22, 2016

September 22, 2026

3.95 %

March 22, 2017

250,000 

December 3, 2014

December 15, 2024

4.00 %

June 15, 2015

250,000 

December 9, 2013

December 15, 2023

5.00 %

June 15, 2014

Interest Payments
Due
June 15 and
December 15
March 22 and
September 22
June 15 and
December 15
June 15 and
December 15

The Operating Partnership’s material current and long-term cash requirements are further described below.

The  Operating  Partnership’s  debt  agreements  contain  customary  representations,  financial  and  other  covenants,  and  its  ability  to  borrow  under  these
agreements is subject to its compliance with financial covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis. The Operating Partnership was in compliance
with such covenants at December 31, 2022.

While the Operating Partnership generally intends to hold its assets as long-term investments, certain of its investments may be sold in order to manage the
Operating Partnership’s interest rate risk and liquidity needs, meet other operating objectives and adapt to market conditions. The timing and impact of
future sales of its investments, if any, cannot be predicted with any certainty.

45

 
 
The Company has investment grade credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service (Baa2), S&P Global Ratings (BBB-) and Fitch Ratings (BBB).

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

Net Cash Provided by (Used in):

Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities

Net Cash Flows from:

Operating Activities

Year Ended December 31,
2021
2022

$
$
$

149,023  $
(144,692) $
(12,235) $

136,332 
(103,645)
(23,960)

Net  cash  flows  provided  by  operating  activities  amounted  to  approximately  $149.0  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  compared  to
approximately $136.3 million in the comparable period in 2021. This increase of approximately $12.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 is
primarily due to the increase in property operating income of approximately $21.2 million, offset by the timing of collections and payments of working
capital accounts.

Investing Activities

Net  cash  flows  used  in  investing  activities  amounted  to  approximately  $144.7  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  compared  to
approximately $103.6 million in the comparable period in 2021. This increase of approximately $41.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 is
primarily  due  to  the  decrease  in  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  real  estate  of  approximately  $33.6  million,  the  increase  in  payments  for  improvements  to
properties of approximately $11.8 million, slightly offset by the decrease in investments in real estate of approximately $4.9 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows used in financing activities amounted to approximately $12.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to approximately
$24.0 million in the comparable period in 2021. This decrease of approximately $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 is primarily due to the
net  increase  in  borrowings  on  the  credit  facility  of  $136.0  million,  offset  by  the  increase  in  dividend  and  distribution  payments  of  approximately  $55.6
million, the decrease in proceeds from the sale of common stock of approximately $44.4 million and the increase in principal repayments on mortgages of
approximately $23.4 million.

46

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Material Cash Requirements

The following table represents the Company’s known contractual and other short-term (i.e., the next twelve months) and long-term (i.e., beyond the next
twelve months) obligations as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

(1)

(2)

Material cash requirements:
Mortgage Notes Payable Principal 
Mortgage Notes Payable Interest
Term loan 
Credit facility 
Senior Notes Due 2027 
Senior Notes Due 2026 
Senior Notes Due 2024 
Senior Notes Due 2023 
Operating lease obligations

(3)

(4)

(4)

(4)

(4)

Total

__________________

Short-Term

Long-Term

Total

$

$

686  $

2,482 
— 
— 
10,475 
7,900 
10,000 
262,500 
1,345 
295,388  $

60,045  $
2,618 
300,000 
88,000 
291,900 
223,700 
260,000 
— 
34,359 
1,260,622  $

60,731 
5,100 
300,000 
88,000 
302,375 
231,600 
270,000 
262,500 
35,704 
1,556,010 

(1) Does not include unamortized mortgage premium of approximately $288,000 as of December 31, 2022.
(2) For the purpose of the above table, the Company has assumed that borrowings under the term loan accrue interest at the interest rate on the term loan

as of December 31, 2022 which was 5.4%.

(3) For the purpose of the above table, the Company has assumed that borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest at the interest rate on the credit

facility as of December 31, 2022 which was 5.2%

(4) Represents payments of interest only in the short-term and payments of both principal and interest in the long-term.

The  short-term  and  long-term  liquidity  requirements  of  the  Company,  including  the  Operating  Partnership  and  its  subsidiaries,  consist  primarily  of  the
material  cash  requirements  set  forth  above,  dividends  expected  to  be  paid  to  the  Company’s  stockholders,  capital  expenditures  and  capital  required  for
acquisitions.

The Company, including the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, plans to satisfy its short-term liquidity requirements, including its material cash
requirements, through operating cash flows, debt refinancings, potential asset sales and/or borrowings under its credit facility.

Historically, the Company,  including  the  Operating  Partnership  and  its  subsidiaries,  has  financed  its  long-term  liquidity  requirements  through  operating
cash flows, borrowings under its credit facility and term loan, debt refinancings, new debt, equity offerings and other capital market transactions, and/or the
disposition  of  assets.  The  Company  expects  to  continue  doing  so  in  the  future.  However,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that  these  sources  will  always  be
available to the Company when needed, or on terms the Company desires or that the future requirements of the Company will not be materially higher than
the Company currently expects.

The Company has committed approximately $23.5 million and $1.2 million in tenant improvements (including building and site improvements) and leasing
commissions, respectively, for the new leases and renewals that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Real Estate Taxes

The Company’s leases generally require the tenants to be responsible for a pro-rata portion of the real estate taxes.

47

 
 
 
 
 
Inflation

The Company’s long-term leases contain provisions to help manage the adverse impact of inflation on its operating results. Such provisions include clauses
entitling the Company to receive (a) scheduled base rent increases and (b) percentage rents based upon tenants’ gross sales which generally increase as
prices rise. In addition, many of the Company’s non-anchor leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits the Company to seek increases in
rents upon renewal at then-current market rates if rents provided in the expiring leases are below then-existing market rates. Most of the Company’s leases
require tenants to pay a share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing the
Company’s exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.

Leverage Policies

The Company employs prudent amounts of leverage and uses debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of its properties and the
diversification of its portfolio. The Company seeks to primarily utilize unsecured debt in order to maintain liquidity and flexibility in its capital structure.

Under the term loan, several banks acting as lenders have agreed to provide up to $300.0 million of borrowing capacity. Effective December 20, 2019, the
Operating Partnership entered into the Term Loan Agreement pursuant to which the maturity date of the term loan was extended from September 8, 2022 to
January 20, 2025, without further options for extension. The Term Loan Agreement also provides that the Operating Partnership may from time to time
request increased aggregate commitments of $200.0 million under certain conditions set forth in the Term Loan Agreement, including the consent of the
lenders for the additional commitments.

Under the credit facility, several banks acting as lenders have agreed to provide up to $600.0 million of borrowing capacity. Effective December 20, 2019,
the  Operating  Partnership  entered  into  the  Credit  Facility  Agreement  pursuant  to  which  the  maturity  date  of  the  credit  facility  was  extended  from
September 8, 2021 to February 20, 2024, with two six-month extension options, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of
certain conditions including the payment of extension fees. Additionally, the Credit Facility Agreement contains an accordion feature, which allows the
Operating Partnership to increase the borrowing capacity under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $1.2 billion, subject to lender consents and other
conditions.

Further, the Operating Partnership issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes in each of December 2017, December 2014
and  December  2013  and  $200.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  unsecured  senior  notes  in  September  2016,  each  of  which  were  fully  and
unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

The  Company  may  borrow  on  a  non-recourse  basis  at  the  corporate  level  or  Operating  Partnership  level.  Non-recourse  indebtedness  means  the
indebtedness of the borrower or its subsidiaries is secured only by specific assets without recourse to other assets of the borrower or any of its subsidiaries.
Even  with  non-recourse  indebtedness,  however,  a  borrower  or  its  subsidiaries  will  likely  be  required  to  guarantee  against  certain  breaches  of
representations  and  warranties  such  as  those  relating  to  the  absence  of  fraud,  misappropriation,  misapplication  of  funds,  environmental  conditions  and
material misrepresentations. Because non-recourse financing generally restricts the lender’s claim on the assets of the borrower, the lender generally may
only proceed against the asset securing the debt. This may protect the Company’s other assets.

The Company plans to evaluate each investment opportunity and determine the appropriate leverage on a case-by-case basis and also on a Company-wide
basis. The Company may seek to refinance indebtedness, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when
an  existing  mortgage  matures  or  if  an  attractive  investment  becomes  available  and  the  proceeds  from  the  refinancing  can  be  used  to  purchase  the
investment.

The Company plans to finance future acquisitions through a combination of cash from operations, borrowings under its credit facility, the assumption of
existing mortgage debt, the issuance of OP Units, equity and debt offerings, and the potential sale of existing assets. In addition, the Company may acquire
retail properties indirectly through joint ventures with third parties as a means of increasing the funds available for the acquisition of properties.

Distributions

The  Operating  Partnership  and  ROIC  intend  to  make  regular  quarterly  distributions  to  holders  of  their  OP  Units  and  common  stock,  respectively.  The
Operating Partnership pays distributions to ROIC directly as a holder of units of the Operating Partnership, and indirectly to ROIC through distributions to
Retail  Opportunity  Investments  GP,  LLC,  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  ROIC.  U.S.  federal  income  tax  law  generally  requires  that  a  REIT  distribute
annually at least 90% of its REIT

48

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
taxable  income,  without  regard  to  the  deduction  for  dividends  paid  and  excluding  net  capital  gains,  and  that  it  pay  U.S.  federal  income  tax  at  regular
corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. ROIC intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its
stockholders  in  an  amount  not  less  than  its  net  taxable  income,  if  and  to  the  extent  authorized  by  its  board  of  directors.  If  ROIC’s  cash  available  for
distribution is less than its net taxable income, ROIC could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or ROIC may make a
portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates related to its debt. There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature
and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the
Company’s future financing requirements.

As a corporation that has elected to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010,
ROIC’s future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to
the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The Company will be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-
term debt used to acquire properties and make real estate-related debt investments. The Company’s interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit
the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company expects to
borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed
rates. In addition, the Company may use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. The Company will not use derivatives for trading or
speculative purposes and will only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.

As  of  December  31,  2022,  the  Company  had  $388.0  million  of  variable  rate  debt  outstanding.  The  Company  has  historically  used  fixed-rate  debt  and
interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. As discussed in Note 11 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company’s four
interest rate swaps matured effective August 31, 2022, and accordingly the interest rate on the term loan was no longer effectively fixed and outstanding
borrowings under the term loan became subject to a variable interest rate effective September 1, 2022. A 100 basis-point increase in short-term interest
rates would have increased the Company’s interest expense by approximately $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 (after giving effect to the
impact of the interest rate swaps which effectively fixed the interest rate on borrowings under the term loan at approximately 3.0% during the period from
January 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022).

49

 
 
Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42)

Consolidated Financial Statements of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.:

Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Financial Statements of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP:

Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Schedules

III  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
IV Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

Page
51

58
59
60
61

62
63
64
65

66

88
92

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under
the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.  (the  Company)  as  of  December  31,  2022  and
2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December  31,  2022,  and  the  related  notes  and  financial  statement  schedules  listed  in  the  Index  at  Item  8  (collectively  referred  to  as  the  “consolidated
financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 16, 2023 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial
statements  based  on  our  audits.  We  are  a  public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  PCAOB  and  are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  error  or  fraud.  Our  audits  included  performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to
those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits
also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The  critical  audit  matters  communicated  below  are  matters  arising  from  the  current  period  audit  of  the  financial  statements  that  were  communicated  or
required  to  be  communicated  to  the  audit  committee  and  that:  (1)  relate  to  accounts  or  disclosures  that  are  material  to  the  financial  statements  and  (2)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion
on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions
on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Description of the Matter

Impairment of real estate investments
At  December  31,  2022,  the  Company’s  real  estate  investments  totaled  $2.8  billion.  As  discussed  in  Note  1  of  the
consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the real estate investments are not expected to be recovered through future undiscounted cash
flows. The Company did not identify any assets that were impaired at December 31, 2022.

51

 
 
 
 
How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit

Description of the Matter

Auditing management’s assessment of impairment is challenging due to the high degree of subjective auditor judgment
necessary in evaluating management’s identification of indicators of potential impairment and the related assessment of
the  severity  of  such  indicators  in  determining  whether  a  triggering  event  has  occurred  that  requires  the  Company  to
evaluate the recoverability of the asset. The significant inputs used in the assessment included capitalization rates, current
and estimated future cash flows associated with each property, which were based on market information including, where
applicable, market rental rates, leasing trends, occupancy trends, and other quantitative and qualitative factors.

We obtained an understanding of management’s process to identify indicators of impairment, including the qualitative and
quantitative  analysis  and  related  inputs  and  assumptions  used  in  performing  the  analyses.  We  evaluated  the  design  and
tested the operating effectiveness of the controls that address the identification of indicators of impairment, in addition to
controls around the quantitative assessment of impairment. For example, we tested controls over the Company’s process
to estimate the fair value of its real estate assets and to assess the recoverability of each investment, including controls
over  management’s  development  and  review  of  the  significant  inputs  and  assumptions  described  above  used  in  the
quantitative assessment.

Our testing of the Company’s impairment assessment included, among other procedures, evaluating significant judgments
applied  in  determining  whether  indicators  of  impairment  were  present  at  any  given  property  by  obtaining  evidence  to
corroborate such judgments and searching for evidence contrary to such judgments. In addition, we reviewed the bad debt
reserves analysis and rent rolls for any tenants with large reserved balances or upcoming lease expirations, in addition to
reviewing various industry market surveys that indicate potential tenants with deteriorating credit quality to determine if
they occupied a substantial portion of any particular property.
Property asset acquisitions
In 2022, the Company acquired five assets, for a combined purchase price of approximately $120.6 million. As discussed
in  Note  1  and  Note  2  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  the  Company  accounted  for  these  purchases  as  asset
acquisitions  in  accordance  with  the  authoritative  accounting  guidance  on  acquisitions  and  business  combinations.  The
Company’s  methodology  of  allocating  the  cost  of  acquisitions  to  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed  is  based  on
relative  fair  values.  For  acquired  operating  real  estate  properties,  the  purchase  price  is  allocated  to  land  and  buildings,
intangible assets such as in-place leases, and intangible liabilities assumed, if any.

Auditing  the  Company’s  accounting  for  its  acquisitions  was  complex  and  highly  judgmental  due  to  the  significant
judgment required in determining estimated fair values of the acquired land and buildings, intangible assets such as in-
place leases, and intangible liabilities. The significant judgment was primarily due to (1) the judgmental nature of inputs,
including discount rate, capitalization rates, cost multipliers and various market assumptions such as market rental rates,
and  (2)  the  complexity  of  the  models  used  to  allocate  the  value  to  the  components  of  properties  acquired  could  have  a
material effect on the Company’s net income due to the differing depreciable and amortizable lives of each component
and  the  classification  of  the  related  depreciation  or  amortization  expense  in  the  Company’s  consolidated  statements  of
operations.

52

How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s
process for determining and reviewing the key inputs and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of acquired assets
and liabilities and allocating fair value to the various components. For example, we tested controls over the valuation of
acquired land, buildings and intangible assets, including the valuation models and underlying assumptions used to develop
such estimates.

Our  testing  of  the  Company’s  accounting  for  its  acquisitions  included,  among  other  procedures,  reading  the  purchase
agreement  and  testing  the  values  allocated  to  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed  by  evaluating  the  valuation
methods and significant assumptions used by management. For example, our real estate valuation specialists assisted us in
evaluating  the  methodologies  used  by  the  Company  and  testing  the  consistency  of  the  selected  discount  rates,
capitalization  rates,  and  various  market  assumptions  such  as  market  rental  rates  with  external  market  data  sources.
Additionally, we evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the determination of various
inputs.  Also,  with  the  assistance  of  our  specialists,  we  evaluated  the  incorporation  of  the  key  assumptions  in  the
aforementioned models and tested such models for clerical accuracy.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.
San Diego, California
February 16, 2023

53

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in
Internal  Control—Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (2013  Framework)  (the
COSO criteria). In our opinion, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated
balance  sheets  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.  as  of  December  31,  2022  and  2021,  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations  and
comprehensive  income,  equity,  and  cash  flows  for  each  of  the  three  years  in  the  period  ended  December  31,  2022  and  the  related  notes  and  financial
statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 8 and our report dated February 16, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  included  in  the  accompanying  Management’s  Report  on  Internal  Control  over  Financial  Reporting  (Retail
Opportunity Investments Corp). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  that  receipts  and  expenditures  of  the  company  are
being  made  only  in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of  the  company;  and  (3)  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Diego, California
February 16, 2023

54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP  (the  “Operating  Partnership”)  as  of
December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, Partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022 and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 8 (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating
Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect  to  the  Operating  Partnership  in  accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the  applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Operating Partnership is not required
to  have,  nor  were  we  engaged  to  perform,  an  audit  of  its  internal  control  over  financial  reporting.  As  part  of  our  audits  we  are  required  to  obtain  an
understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  Operating
Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our  audits  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial  statements,  whether  due  to  error  or  fraud,  and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the  financial  statements.  Our  audits  also  included  evaluating  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as  well  as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The  critical  audit  matters  communicated  below  are  matters  arising  from  the  current  period  audit  of  the  financial  statements  that  were  communicated  or
required  to  be  communicated  to  the  audit  committee  and  that:  (1)  relate  to  accounts  or  disclosures  that  are  material  to  the  financial  statements  and  (2)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion
on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions
on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Description of the Matter

Impairment of real estate investments
At December 31, 2022, the Operating Partnership’s real estate investments totaled $2.8 billion. As discussed in Note 1 of
the consolidated financial statements, the Operating Partnership reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  real  estate  investments  are  not  expected  to  be  recovered  through  future
undiscounted cash flows. The Operating Partnership did not identify any assets that were impaired at December 31, 2022.

55

 
 
 
How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit

Description of the Matter

Auditing management’s assessment of impairment is challenging due to the high degree of subjective auditor judgment
necessary in evaluating management’s identification of indicators of potential impairment and the related assessment of
the  severity  of  such  indicators  in  determining  whether  a  triggering  event  has  occurred  that  requires  the  Operating
Partnership to evaluate the recoverability of the asset. The significant inputs used in the assessment included capitalization
rates,  current  and  estimated  future  cash  flows  associated  with  each  property,  which  were  based  on  market  information
including, where applicable, market rental rates, leasing trends, occupancy trends, and other quantitative and qualitative
factors.

We obtained an understanding of management’s process to identify indicators of impairment, including the qualitative and
quantitative  analysis  and  related  inputs  and  assumptions  used  in  performing  the  analyses.  We  evaluated  the  design  and
tested the operating effectiveness of the controls that address the identification of indicators of impairment, in addition to
controls  around  the  quantitative  assessment  of  impairment.  For  example,  we  tested  controls  over  the  Operating
Partnership’s process to estimate the fair value of its real estate assets and to assess the recoverability of each investment,
including controls over management’s development and review of the significant inputs and assumptions described above
used in the quantitative assessment.

Our  testing  of  the  Operating  Partnership’s  impairment  assessment  included,  among  other  procedures,  evaluating
significant  judgments  applied  in  determining  whether  indicators  of  impairment  were  present  at  any  given  property  by
obtaining evidence to corroborate such judgments and searching for evidence contrary to such judgments. In addition, we
reviewed  the  bad  debt  reserves  analysis  and  rent  rolls  for  any  tenants  with  large  reserved  balances  or  upcoming  lease
expirations,  in  addition  to  reviewing  various  industry  market  surveys  that  indicate  potential  tenants  with  deteriorating
credit quality to determine if they occupied a substantial portion of any particular property.
Property asset acquisitions
In 2022, the Operating Partnership acquired five assets, for a combined purchase price of approximately $120.6 million.
As discussed in Note 1 and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Operating Partnership accounted for these
purchases  as  asset  acquisitions  in  accordance  with  the  authoritative  accounting  guidance  on  acquisitions  and  business
combinations.  The  Operating  Partnership’s  methodology  of  allocating  the  cost  of  acquisitions  to  assets  acquired  and
liabilities  assumed  is  based  on  relative  fair  values.  For  acquired  operating  real  estate  properties,  the  purchase  price  is
allocated to land and buildings, intangible assets such as in-place leases, and intangible liabilities assumed, if any.

Auditing  the  Operating  Partnership’s  accounting  for  its  acquisitions  was  complex  and  highly  judgmental  due  to  the
significant  judgment  required  in  determining  estimated  fair  values  of  the  acquired  land  and  buildings,  intangible  assets
such as in-place leases, and intangible liabilities. The significant judgment was primarily due to (1) the judgmental nature
of  inputs,  including  discount  rate,  capitalization  rates,  cost  multipliers  and  various  market  assumptions  such  as  market
rental  rates,  and  (2)  the  complexity  of  the  models  used  to  allocate  the  value  to  the  components  of  properties  acquired
could have a material effect on the Operating Partnership’s net income due to the differing depreciable and amortizable
lives  of  each  component  and  the  classification  of  the  related  depreciation  or  amortization  expense  in  the  Operating
Partnership’s consolidated statements of operations.

56

How We Addressed the Matter
in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Operating
Partnership’s process for determining and reviewing the key inputs and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of
acquired assets and liabilities and allocating fair value to the various components. For example, we tested controls over
the valuation of acquired land, buildings and intangible assets, including the valuation models and underlying assumptions
used to develop such estimates.

Our testing of the Operating Partnership’s accounting for its acquisitions included, among other procedures, reading the
purchase  agreement  and  testing  the  values  allocated  to  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed  by  evaluating  the
valuation  methods  and  significant  assumptions  used  by  management.  For  example,  our  real  estate  valuation  specialists
assisted us in evaluating the methodologies used by the Operating Partnership and testing the consistency of the selected
discount rates, capitalization rates, and various market assumptions such as market rental rates with external market data
sources. Additionally, we evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the determination of
various inputs. Also, with the assistance of our specialists, we evaluated the incorporation of the key assumptions in the
aforementioned models and tested such models for clerical accuracy.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 2013.
San Diego, California
February 16, 2023

57

  
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

ASSETS
Real Estate Investments:
Land
Building and improvements

Less:  accumulated depreciation

Mortgage note receivable
Real Estate Investments, net
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Tenant and other receivables, net
Deposits
Acquired lease intangible assets, net
Prepaid expenses
Deferred charges, net
Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Term loan
Credit facility
Senior Notes
Mortgage notes payable
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Tenants’ security deposits
Other liabilities
Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies

Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 124,538,811 and
122,685,266 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021,
respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated dividends in excess of earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. stockholders’ equity
Non-controlling interests
Total equity

Total liabilities and equity

$

$

$

$

958,236  $

2,452,857 
3,411,093 
578,593 
2,832,500 
4,786 
2,837,286 
5,598 
1,861 
57,546 
500 
52,428 
5,957 
26,683 
16,420 
3,004,279  $

299,253  $
88,000 
946,849 
60,917 
152,117 
22,885 
7,701 
41,959 
1,619,681 

915,861 
2,350,294 
3,266,155 
510,836 
2,755,319 
4,875 
2,760,194 
13,218 
2,145 
55,787 
— 
50,139 
5,337 
25,017 
17,007 
2,928,844 

298,889 
— 
945,231 
85,354 
136,608 
48,598 
7,231 
40,580 
1,562,491 

— 

— 

12 
1,612,126 
(315,984)
14 
1,296,168 
88,430 
1,384,598 
3,004,279  $

12 
1,577,837 
(297,801)
(3,154)
1,276,894 
89,459 
1,366,353 
2,928,844 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(In thousands, except per share data)

Revenues
Rental revenue
Other income
Total revenues

Operating expenses
Property operating
Property taxes
Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative expenses
Other expense
Total operating expenses

Gain on sale of real estate

Operating income

Non-operating expenses
Interest expense and other finance expenses
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Net Income Attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Earnings per share – basic and diluted

Dividends per common share

Comprehensive income:
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized swap derivative gain (loss) arising during the period
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net
income

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

Comprehensive income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

2022

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2020

308,960  $
3,969 
312,929 

280,924  $
3,176 
284,100 

51,057 
34,651 
97,494 
21,735 
960 
205,897 

7,653 

44,439 
33,663 
92,929 
19,654 
860 
191,545 

22,340 

280,388 
3,726 
284,114 

41,050 
33,288 
97,731 
16,755 
843 
189,667 

— 

114,685 

114,895 

94,447 

(59,225)
55,460 
(3,591)
51,869  $

0.42  $

0.56  $

(57,535)
57,360 
(3,852)
53,508  $

0.44  $

0.51  $

55,460  $

57,360  $

1,104 

216 

2,286 
3,390 
58,850 
(3,813)
55,037  $

5,894 
6,110 
63,470 
(4,304)
59,166  $

(59,726)
34,721 
(2,707)
32,014 

0.27 

0.20 

34,721 

(9,925)

4,572 
(5,353)
29,368 
(2,034)
27,334 

$

$

$

$

$

$

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share data) 

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Additional
paid-in capital

Accumulated
dividends in
excess of earnings

Accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) income

Non-
controlling
interests

Equity

Balance at December 31, 2019

116,496,016  $

12  $

1,481,466  $

(297,998) $

(4,132) $

112,480  $

1,291,828 

Shares issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
Shares withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of restricted stock
Stock based compensation expense
Redemption of OP Units
Cash redemption for non-controlling interests
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in
Operating Partnership
Repurchase of common stock
Registration expenditures
Cash dividends ($0.20 per share)
Dividends payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity
Investments Corp.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Other comprehensive loss

428,170 
(128,614)
(4,899)
— 
1,968,350 
— 

— 
(673,868)
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
(2,272)
— 
8,098 
20,098 
— 

(570)
(8,846)
(312)
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
(23,273)
(52)

32,014 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
(4,680)

— 
— 
— 
816 
(20,098)
(1,999)

570 
— 
— 
(2,187)
(10)

— 
2,707 
(673)

— 
(2,272)
— 
8,914 
— 
(1,999)

— 
(8,846)
(312)
(25,460)
(62)

32,014 
2,707 
(5,353)

Balance at December 31, 2020

118,085,155  $

12  $

1,497,662  $

(289,309) $

(8,812) $

91,606  $

1,291,159 

Shares issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
Shares withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of restricted stock
Stock based compensation expense
Redemption of OP Units
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in
Operating Partnership
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Registration expenditures
Cash dividends ($0.51 per share)
Dividends payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity
Investments Corp.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Other comprehensive income

535,819 
(142,247)
(5,482)
— 
423,986 

— 
3,788,035 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

428 
(1,905)
— 
9,735 
6,858 

(3,625)
69,602 
(918)
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
(61,717)
(283)

53,508 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
5,658 

— 
— 
— 
1,295 
(6,858)

3,625 
— 
— 
(4,395)
(118)

— 
3,852 
452 

428 
(1,905)
— 
11,030 
— 

— 
69,602 
(918)
(66,112)
(401)

53,508 
3,852 
6,110 

Balance at December 31, 2021

122,685,266  $

12  $

1,577,837  $

(297,801) $

(3,154) $

89,459  $

1,366,353 

Shares issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
Shares withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of restricted stock
Stock based compensation expense
Redemption of OP Units
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in
Operating Partnership
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
Registration expenditures
Cash dividends ($0.56 per share)
Dividends payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity
Investments Corp.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Other comprehensive income

Balance at December 31, 2022

406,106 
(123,466)
(14,148)
— 
296,840 

— 
1,288,213 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

302 
(2,416)
— 
11,949 
5,071 

(5,017)
25,199 
(799)
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
(69,533)
(519)

51,869 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
3,168 

— 
— 
— 
— 
(5,071)

5,017 
— 
— 
(4,788)
— 

— 
3,591 
222 

302 
(2,416)
— 
11,949 
— 

— 
25,199 
(799)
(74,321)
(519)

51,869 
3,591 
3,390 

124,538,811  $

12  $

1,612,126  $

(315,984) $

14  $

88,430  $

1,384,598 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

60

 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of deferred financing costs and mortgage discounts and premiums, net
Straight-line rent adjustment
Amortization of above and below market rent
Amortization relating to stock based compensation
Provisions for tenant credit losses
Other noncash interest (income) expense
Gain on sale of real estate
Change in operating assets and liabilities:

Tenant and other receivables
Prepaid expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other assets and liabilities, net

Net cash provided by operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investments in real estate
Proceeds from sale of real estate
Improvements to properties
Deposits on real estate acquisitions, net
Proceeds on repayment of mortgage note receivable

Net cash used in investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal repayments on mortgages
Proceeds from draws on credit facility
Payments on credit facility
Redemption of OP Units
Distributions to OP Unitholders
Deferred financing and other costs
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
Repurchase of common stock
Registration expenditures
Dividends paid to common stockholders
Common shares issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
Shares withheld for employee taxes

Net cash used in financing activities

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

Year Ended December 31,

2022

2021

2020

$

55,460 

$

57,360 

$

34,721 

97,494 
2,559 
(2,715)
(11,947)
11,949 
2,034 
(57)
(7,653)

(1,976)
(630)
1,242 
3,263 

149,023 

(120,639)
34,435 
(58,077)
(500)
89 

(144,692)

(24,133)
168,000 
(80,000)
— 
(6,628)
— 
25,199 
— 
(976)
(91,583)
302 
(2,416)

(12,235)

(7,904)
15,363 

92,929 
2,383 
(959)
(8,795)
11,030 
2,779 
45 
(22,340)

(1,039)
(597)
5,072 
(1,536)

136,332 

(125,490)
68,003 
(46,242)
— 
84 

(103,645)

(716)
30,000 
(78,000)
— 
(2,857)
— 
69,602 
— 
(740)
(39,772)
428 
(1,905)

(23,960)

8,727 
6,636 

$

7,459 

$

15,363 

$

97,731 
2,219 
(1,079)
(17,654)
8,914 
11,035 
293 
— 

(23,120)
(1,641)
(1,096)
(3,663)

106,660 

— 
— 
(36,515)
— 
8,041 

(28,474)

(577)
160,000 
(196,000)
(1,999)
(2,187)
(1,162)
— 
(8,846)
(567)
(23,398)
— 
(2,272)

(77,008)

1,178 
5,458 

6,636 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the
total of the same amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:

Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,

2022

2021

2020

$

$

5,598 
1,861 

7,459 

$

$

13,218 
2,145 

15,363 

$

$

4,822 
1,814 

6,636 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

ASSETS
Real Estate Investments:
Land
Building and improvements

Less:  accumulated depreciation

Mortgage note receivable
Real Estate Investments, net
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Tenant and other receivables, net
Deposits
Acquired lease intangible assets, net
Prepaid expenses
Deferred charges, net
Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Term loan
Credit facility
Senior Notes
Mortgage notes payable
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Tenants’ security deposits
Other liabilities
Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies

Capital:
Partners’ capital, unlimited partnership units authorized:
ROIC capital
Limited partners’ capital
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total capital

Total liabilities and capital

$

$

$

$

958,236  $

2,452,857 
3,411,093 
578,593 
2,832,500 
4,786 
2,837,286 
5,598 
1,861 
57,546 
500 
52,428 
5,957 
26,683 
16,420 
3,004,279  $

299,253  $
88,000 
946,849 
60,917 
152,117 
22,885 
7,701 
41,959 
1,619,681 

1,296,154 
88,429 
15 
1,384,598 
3,004,279  $

915,861 
2,350,294 
3,266,155 
510,836 
2,755,319 
4,875 
2,760,194 
13,218 
2,145 
55,787 
— 
50,139 
5,337 
25,017 
17,007 
2,928,844 

298,889 
— 
945,231 
85,354 
136,608 
48,598 
7,231 
40,580 
1,562,491 

1,280,048 
89,680 
(3,375)
1,366,353 
2,928,844 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

62

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)

Revenues
Rental revenue
Other income
Total revenues

Operating expenses
Property operating
Property taxes
Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative expenses
Other expense
Total operating expenses

Gain on sale of real estate

Operating income
Non-operating expenses
Interest expense and other finance expenses

Net Income Attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Earnings per unit - basic and diluted

Distributions per unit

Comprehensive income:
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized swap derivative gain (loss) arising during the period
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net income

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Comprehensive income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2022

2020

308,960  $
3,969 
312,929 

280,924  $
3,176 
284,100 

51,057 
34,651 
97,494 
21,735 
960 
205,897 

44,439 
33,663 
92,929 
19,654 
860 
191,545 

280,388 
3,726 
284,114 

41,050 
33,288 
97,731 
16,755 
843 
189,667 

7,653 

22,340 

— 

114,685 

114,895 

94,447 

(59,225)
55,460  $

(57,535)
57,360  $

(59,726)
34,721 

0.42  $

0.44  $

0.56  $

0.51  $

0.27 

0.20 

55,460  $

57,360  $

34,721 

1,104 
2,286 
3,390 

216 
5,894 
6,110 

58,850  $

63,470  $

(9,925)
4,572 
(5,353)

29,368 

$

$

$

$

$

$

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital
(In thousands, except unit data)

Limited Partner’s Capital

 (1)

ROIC Capital 

(2)

Balance at December 31, 2019

OP Units issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
OP Units withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of OP Units
Stock based compensation expense
Equity redemption of OP Units
Cash redemption of OP Units
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in Operating
Partnership
Repurchase of OP Units
Registration expenditures
Cash distributions ($0.20 per unit)
Distributions payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments
Partnership, LP
Other comprehensive loss

Balance at December 31, 2020

OP Units issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
OP Units withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of OP Units
Stock based compensation expense
Equity redemption of OP Units
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in Operating
Partnership
Issuance of OP Units in connection with sale of common stock
Registration expenditures
Cash distributions ($0.51 per unit)
Distributions payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments
Partnership, LP
Other comprehensive income

Balance at December 31, 2021

OP Units issued under the Equity Incentive Plan
OP Units withheld for employee taxes
Cancellation of OP Units
Stock based compensation expense
Equity redemption of OP Units
Adjustment to non-controlling interests ownership in Operating
Partnership
Issuance of OP Units in connection with sale of common stock
Registration expenditures
Cash distributions ($0.56 per unit)
Distributions payable to officers
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments
Partnership, LP
Other comprehensive income

$

Units
11,051,090 

— 
— 
— 
— 
(1,968,350)
(116,657)

Amount

112,480 

— 
— 
— 
816 
(20,098)
(1,999)

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

8,966,083 

$

— 
— 
— 
— 
(423,986)

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

8,542,097 

$

201,860 
— 
— 
— 
(296,840)

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

570 
— 
— 
(2,187)
(10)

2,707 
— 

92,279 

— 
— 
— 
1,295 
(6,858)

3,625 
— 
— 
(4,395)
(118)

3,852 
— 

89,680 

— 
— 
— 
— 
(5,071)

5,017 
— 
— 
(4,788)
— 

3,591 
— 

88,429 

Balance at December 31, 2022

8,447,117 

$

(1) Consists of limited partnership interests held by third parties.
(2) Consists of general and limited partnership interests held by ROIC.

Accumulated
other
comprehensive (loss)
income

Capital

Amount

$

1,183,480 

$

(4,132)

$

1,291,828 

— 
(2,272)
— 
8,098 
20,098 
— 

(570)
(8,846)
(312)
(23,273)
(52)

32,014 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
(5,353)

— 
(2,272)
— 
8,914 
— 
(1,999)

— 
(8,846)
(312)
(25,460)
(62)

34,721 
(5,353)

Units
116,496,016 

428,170 
(128,614)
(4,899)
— 
1,968,350 
— 

— 
(673,868)
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

118,085,155 

$

1,208,365 

$

(9,485)

$

1,291,159 

535,819 
(142,247)
(5,482)
— 
423,986 

— 
3,788,035 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

428 
(1,905)
— 
9,735 
6,858 

(3,625)
69,602 
(918)
(61,717)
(283)

53,508 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
6,110 

428 
(1,905)
— 
11,030 
— 

— 
69,602 
(918)
(66,112)
(401)

57,360 
6,110 

122,685,266 

$

1,280,048 

$

(3,375)

$

1,366,353 

406,106 
(123,466)
(14,148)
— 
296,840 

— 
1,288,213 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

302 
(2,416)
— 
11,949 
5,071 

(5,017)
25,199 
(799)
(69,533)
(519)

51,869 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
3,390 

302 
(2,416)
— 
11,949 
— 

— 
25,199 
(799)
(74,321)
(519)

55,460 
3,390 

124,538,811 

$

1,296,154 

$

15 

$

1,384,598 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

64

 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of deferred financing costs and mortgage discounts and premiums, net
Straight-line rent adjustment
Amortization of above and below market rent
Amortization relating to stock based compensation
Provisions for tenant credit losses
Other noncash interest (income) expense
Gain on sale of real estate
Change in operating assets and liabilities:

Tenant and other receivables
Prepaid expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other assets and liabilities, net

Net cash provided by operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investments in real estate
Proceeds from sale of real estate
Improvements to properties
Deposits on real estate acquisitions, net
Proceeds on repayment of mortgage note receivable

Net cash used in investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal repayments on mortgages
Proceeds from draws on credit facility
Payments on credit facility
Redemption of OP Units
Deferred financing and other costs
Proceeds from the issuance of OP Units in connection with issuance of common stock
Repurchase of OP Units
Registration expenditures
Distributions to OP Unitholders
Issuance of OP Units under the Equity Incentive Plan
OP Units withheld for employee taxes

Net cash used in financing activities

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

Year Ended December 31,

2022

2021

2020

$

55,460 

$

57,360 

$

34,721 

97,494 
2,559 
(2,715)
(11,947)
11,949 
2,034 
(57)
(7,653)

(1,976)
(630)
1,242 
3,263 

149,023 

(120,639)
34,435 
(58,077)
(500)
89 

(144,692)

(24,133)
168,000 
(80,000)
— 
— 
25,199 
— 
(976)
(98,211)
302 
(2,416)

(12,235)

(7,904)
15,363 

92,929 
2,383 
(959)
(8,795)
11,030 
2,779 
45 
(22,340)

(1,039)
(597)
5,072 
(1,536)

136,332 

(125,490)
68,003 
(46,242)
— 
84 

(103,645)

(716)
30,000 
(78,000)
— 
— 
69,602 
— 
(740)
(42,629)
428 
(1,905)

(23,960)

8,727 
6,636 

$

7,459 

$

15,363 

$

97,731 
2,219 
(1,079)
(17,654)
8,914 
11,035 
293 
— 

(23,120)
(1,641)
(1,096)
(3,663)

106,660 

— 
— 
(36,515)
— 
8,041 

(28,474)

(577)
160,000 
(196,000)
(1,999)
(1,162)
— 
(8,846)
(567)
(25,585)
— 
(2,272)

(77,008)

1,178 
5,458 

6,636 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the
total of the same amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:

Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,

2022

2021

2020

$

$

5,598 
1,861 

7,459 

$

$

13,218 
2,145 

15,363 

$

$

4,822 
1,814 

6,636 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

65

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  a  Maryland  corporation  (“ROIC”),  is  a  fully  integrated  and  self-managed  real  estate  investment  trust  (“REIT”).
ROIC specializes in the acquisition, ownership and management of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers on the west coast of the
United States, anchored by supermarkets and drugstores.

ROIC is organized in a traditional umbrella partnership real estate investment trust (“UpREIT”) format pursuant to which Retail Opportunity Investments
GP,  LLC,  its  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  serves  as  the  general  partner  of,  and  ROIC  conducts  substantially  all  of  its  business  through,  its  operating
partnership  subsidiary,  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  a  Delaware  limited  partnership  (the  “Operating  Partnership”),  together  with  its
subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references to the “Company”, “we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company”
refer to ROIC together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.

ROIC’s  only  material  asset  is  its  ownership  of  direct  or  indirect  partnership  interests  in  the  Operating  Partnership  and  membership  interest  in  Retail
Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As a result, ROIC does not conduct business itself, other
than acting as the parent company and issuing equity from time to time. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and
directly  or  indirectly  holds  the  ownership  interests  in  the  Company’s  real  estate  ventures.  The  Operating  Partnership  conducts  the  operations  of  the
Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by ROIC, which are
contributed  to  the  Operating  Partnership,  the  Operating  Partnership  generates  the  capital  required  by  the  Company’s  business  through  the  Operating
Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s incurrence of indebtedness (directly and through subsidiaries) or through the issuance of operating
partnership units (“OP Units”) of the Operating Partnership.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-04 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848).” ASU No. 2020-04 contains
practical expedients for reference rate reform related activities that impact debt, leases, derivatives and other contracts. The guidance in ASU No. 2020-04
is optional and may be elected over time as reference rate reform activities occur. During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, the Company elected to apply
the hedge accounting expedients related to probability and the assessments of effectiveness for future LIBOR-indexed cash flows to assume that the index
upon which future hedged transactions will be based matches the index on the corresponding derivatives. Application of these expedients preserves the
presentation of derivatives consistent with past presentation. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance and may apply other elections
as applicable as additional changes in the market occur.

In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-06 “Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848” which was issued to defer the sunset date of Reference
Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform to December 31, 2024. ASU No. 2022-06 is effective immediately for all
companies. ASU No. 2022-06 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary, which are of a normal and
recurring nature, for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  the  Company  and  those  of  its  subsidiaries,  which  are  wholly-owned  or  controlled  by  the
Company. Entities which the Company does not control through its voting interest and entities which are variable interest entities (“VIEs”), but where it is
not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The  Company  follows  the  FASB  guidance  for  determining  whether  an  entity  is  a  VIE  and  requires  the  performance  of  a  qualitative  rather  than  a
quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the
power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right
to receive benefits from the VIE that could

66

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
be significant to the VIE. The Company has concluded that the Operating Partnership is a VIE, and because they have both the power and the rights to
control the Operating Partnership, they are the primary beneficiary and are required to continue to consolidate the Operating Partnership.

A  non-controlling  interest  in  a  consolidated  subsidiary  is  defined  as  the  portion  of  the  equity  (net  assets)  in  a  subsidiary  not  attributable,  directly  or
indirectly,  to  a  parent.  Non-controlling  interests  are  required  to  be  presented  as  a  separate  component  of  equity  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  and
modify the presentation of net income by requiring earnings and other comprehensive income to be attributed to controlling and non-controlling interests.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the periods covered by the financial statements. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the recoverability of assets to
be  held  and  used,  purchase  price  allocations,  depreciable  lives,  revenue  recognition  and  the  collectability  of  tenant  receivables,  other  receivables,  notes
receivables, and the valuation of performance-based restricted stock, LTIP Units (as defined below), and derivatives. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.

Federal Income Taxes

The Company has elected to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Under those sections, a REIT that,
among  other  things,  distributes  at  least  90%  of  its  REIT  taxable  income  (determined  without  regard  to  the  dividends  paid  deduction  and  excluding  net
capital gains) and meets certain other qualifications prescribed by the Code, will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income that is distributed.

Although  it  may  qualify  as  a  REIT  for  U.S.  federal  income  tax  purposes,  the  Company  is  subject  to  state  income  or  franchise  taxes  in  certain  states  in
which  some  of  its  properties  are  located.  For  all  periods  from  inception  through  September  26,  2013  the  Operating  Partnership  had  been  an  entity
disregarded  from  its  sole  owner,  ROIC,  for  U.S.  federal  income  tax  purposes  and  as  such  had  not  been  subject  to  U.S.  federal  income  taxes.  Effective
September 27, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued OP Units in connection with the acquisitions of two shopping centers. Accordingly, the Operating
Partnership ceased being a disregarded entity and instead is being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The  Company  follows  the  FASB  guidance  that  defines  a  recognition  threshold  and  measurement  attribute  for  the  financial  statement  recognition  and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The FASB also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company records interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any,
as interest expense. As of December 31, 2022, the statute of limitations for the tax years 2018 through and including 2021 remain open for examination by
the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state taxing authorities. 

ROIC intends to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of its common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute
annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay U.S.
federal income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. ROIC intends to pay regular
quarterly dividends to stockholders in an amount not less than its net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by its board of directors. Before ROIC
pays any dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, it must first meet both its operating requirements and its debt service on
debt.  If  ROIC’s  cash  available  for  distribution  is  less  than  its  net  taxable  income,  it  could  be  required  to  sell  assets  or  borrow  funds  to  make  cash
distributions or it may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities. The Company
intends  to  continue  to  operate  its  business  in  a  manner  that  will  allow  it  to  qualify  as  a  REIT,  including  maintaining  compliance  with  taxable  income
distribution requirements.

67

 
 
The following table sets forth the dividends declared per share of ROIC’s common stock and the tax status for U.S. federal income tax purposes of such
dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Record Date

Payable Date

Total Distribution per
Share

Ordinary Income per
Share

Section 199A Dividends 

(1)

3/18/2022
6/17/2022
9/16/2022
12/15/2022

4/8/2022
7/8/2022
10/7/2022
12/29/2022

$0.1300
$0.1300
$0.1500
$0.1500

$0.1300
$0.1300
$0.1500
$0.1500

$0.1300
$0.1300
$0.1500
$0.1500

 ______________________

(1) Represents dividends eligible for the 20% qualified business income deduction under Section 199A, and is included in “Ordinary Income per Share”

Real Estate Investments

All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations and improvements that enhance and/or
extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs and improvements that do not materially prolong the
normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, capitalized costs related to the
improvement or replacement of real estate properties were approximately $55.1 million and $48.6 million, respectively.

The Company evaluates each acquisition of real estate to determine if the acquired property meets the definition of a business and needs to be accounted
for as a business combination. The Company first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a
single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the acquired property does not meet the definition of a business and
is accounted for as an asset acquisition. The Company expects that acquisitions of real estate properties will not meet the revised definition of a business
because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related
intangible assets).

The Company recognizes the acquisition of real estate properties, including acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and
acquired  intangible  assets  and  liabilities  (consisting  of  above-market  and  below-market  leases  and  acquired  in-place  leases)  at  their  fair  value  (for
acquisitions meeting the definition of a business) and relative fair value (for acquisitions not meeting the definition of a business). The relative fair values
used to allocate the cost of an asset acquisition are determined using the same methodologies and assumptions the Company utilizes to determine fair value
in a business combination.

Acquired lease intangible assets include above-market leases and acquired in-place leases, and acquired lease intangible liabilities represent below-market
leases, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property
as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of
these assets. In valuing an acquired property’s intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected
lease-up periods, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on management’s evaluation of current market demand.
Management  also  estimates  costs  to  execute  similar  leases,  including  leasing  commissions,  tenant  improvements,  legal  and  other  related  costs.  Leasing
commissions, legal and other related costs (“lease origination costs”) are classified as Deferred charges in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The value of in-place leases is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental
rates, over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if it were vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present
value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received
and  management’s  estimate  of  market  lease  rates,  measured  over  the  terms  of  the  respective  leases  that  management  deemed  appropriate  at  the  time  of
acquisition. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair
values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company’s experience and the relevant facts and circumstances
that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The value of the above-market and below-market leases is amortized to base rental income, over the terms of the
respective leases including option periods, if applicable. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancellable terms of
the respective

68

 
 
 
leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that
time.

The Company expenses transaction costs associated with business combinations and unsuccessful property asset acquisitions in the period incurred and
capitalizes transaction costs associated with successful property asset acquisitions. In conjunction with the Company’s pursuit and acquisition of real estate
investments, the Company did not expense any acquisition transaction costs during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 or 2020.

Sales of real estate are recognized only when it is determined that the Company will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it is entitled,
possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the Company has no controlling financial interest. The application of
these criteria can be complex and requires the Company to make assumptions. Management has determined that all of these criteria were met for all real
estate sold during the periods presented.

Asset Impairment

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to aggregate future net cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured  by  the  amount  by  which  the  carrying  amount  of  the  assets  exceed  the  fair  value.  Management  does  not  believe  that  the  value  of  any  of  the
Company’s real estate investments was impaired at December 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and
cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed the federally insured limit by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances.

Restricted Cash

The terms of the Company’s mortgage loans payable may require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such
“restricted cash” is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established and is not available to fund other
property-level or Company-level obligations.

Revenue Recognition

Management has determined that all of the Company’s leases with its various tenants are operating leases. Rental income is generally recognized based on
the terms of leases entered into with tenants. In those instances in which the Company funds tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be
owned by the Company, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is
turned over to the tenant. When the Company determines that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, the Company commences revenue recognition and
lease incentive amortization when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. Minimum rental income from
leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Percentage rent is recognized when a specific tenant’s sales
breakpoint is achieved. Each lease agreement is evaluated to identify the lease and nonlease components at lease inception. The Company combines lease
and non-lease components into a single lease component presentation if (i) the timing and pattern of the revenue recognition of the combined single lease
component is the same, and (ii) the related lease component and the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. As a result
of this assessment, rental revenues and tenant recoveries from the lease of real estate assets are accounted for as a single component. Lease incentives are
amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the respective tenant lease terms.

Termination fees (included in Other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income) are fees that the Company has agreed
to  accept  in  consideration  for  permitting  certain  tenants  to  terminate  their  lease  prior  to  the  contractual  expiration  date.  The  Company  recognizes
termination fees when the following conditions are met: (a) the termination agreement is executed; (b) the termination fee is determinable; (c) all landlord
services pursuant to the terminated lease have been rendered; and (d) collectability of substantially all of the termination fee is probable. Interest income is
recognized as it is earned. Gains or losses on disposition of properties are recorded when the criteria for recognizing such gains or losses have been met.

69

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Company must make estimates as to the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rent, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and
other  revenues.  Management  analyzes  accounts  receivable  by  considering  tenant  creditworthiness,  current  economic  trends,  including  the  impact  of  the
COVID-19  pandemic  on  tenants’  businesses,  and  changes  in  tenants’  payment  patterns  when  evaluating  the  adequacy  of  the  allowance  for  doubtful
accounts  receivable.  The  Company  also  provides  an  allowance  for  future  credit  losses  of  the  deferred  straight-line  rents  receivable.  The  allowance  for
doubtful accounts at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 was approximately $15.7 million and $18.4 million, respectively.

Certain  of  the  Company’s  tenants  experienced  economic  difficulties  as  a  result  of  the  COVID-19  pandemic  and  sought  future  rent  relief,  which  was
provided in the form of rent deferrals and rent abatements. Under ASC 842, “Leases,” subsequent changes to lease payments that are not stipulated in the
original lease contract are generally accounted for as lease modifications. Due to the number of lease contracts that would require analysis to determine, on
a lease by lease basis, whether such a concession is required to be accounted for as a lease modification, the FASB staff provided clarity as to an acceptable
approach  to  accounting  for  lease  concessions  related  to  the  effects  of  the  COVID-19  pandemic.  The  FASB  staff  provided  guidance  that  it  would  be
acceptable for entities to make an election to account for lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic consistent with how those
concessions  would  be  accounted  for  under  ASC  842  as  though  enforceable  rights  and  obligations  for  those  concessions  existed  in  the  existing  lease
contract, as long as the concession does not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee, thereby not requiring
entities  to  apply  lease  modification  guidance  to  those  contracts.  The  Company  elected  to  not  account  for  such  COVID-19  concessions  as  lease
modifications.  Since  the  onset  of  the  COVID-19  pandemic,  the  Company  entered  into  lease  concessions  that  deferred  approximately  $10.9  million  of
contractual  amounts  billed.  As  of  December  31,  2022,  approximately  $9.5  million  of  such  deferral  amounts  have  been  rebilled  in  accordance  with  the
underlying agreements, of which approximately $8.5 million, or approximately 89.7% has been collected. The Company evaluated rent relief requests on a
case-by-case  basis  and  not  all  tenant  requests  resulted  in  concession  agreements,  nor  did  the  Company  forego  its  contractual  rights  under  its  lease
agreements.

Depreciation and Amortization

The Company uses the straight-line method for depreciation and amortization. Buildings are depreciated over estimated useful lives which the Company
estimates to be 39 to 40 years. Property improvements are depreciated over estimated useful lives that range from 10 to 20 years. Furniture and fixtures are
depreciated over estimated useful lives that range from 3 to 10 years. Tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the related leases or
their useful life.

Deferred Leasing and Financing Costs

Costs incurred in obtaining tenant leases (principally leasing commissions and acquired lease origination costs) are amortized ratably over the life of the
tenant leases. Costs incurred in obtaining long-term financing are amortized ratably over the related debt agreement. The amortization of deferred leasing
and  financing  costs  is  included  in  Depreciation  and  amortization  and  Interest  expense  and  other  finance  expenses,  respectively,  in  the  consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The unamortized balances of deferred leasing costs included in deferred charges in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 that will be
charged to future operations are as follows (in thousands):

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Concentration of Credit Risk

Lease Origination Costs
4,679 
$
3,758 
3,191 
2,599 
2,173 
9,283 
25,683 

$

Financial  instruments  that  potentially  subject  the  Company  to  concentrations  of  credit  risk  consist  primarily  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  tenant
receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in excess of insured amounts with high

70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
quality financial institutions. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants and requires tenants to provide security deposits.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes the impact of dilutive shares and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of
common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock and then shared in the earnings of the Company.

For  the  years  ended  December  31,  2022,  2021  and  2020,  basic  EPS  was  determined  by  dividing  net  income  allocable  to  common  stockholders  for  the
applicable period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such period. Net income during the applicable period is
also allocated to the time-based unvested restricted stock as these grants are entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends and are therefore considered a
participating  security.  Time-based  unvested  restricted  stock  is  not  allocated  net  losses  and/or  any  excess  of  dividends  declared  over  net  income;  such
amounts are allocated entirely to the common stockholders other than the holders of time-based unvested restricted stock. The performance-based restricted
stock awards and LTIP Units (defined below) outstanding under the Equity Incentive Plan described in Note 8 are excluded from the basic EPS calculation,
as these units are not participating securities until they vest.

The following table sets forth the reconciliation between basic and diluted EPS for ROIC (in thousands, except share data):

Numerator:
Net income

Less income attributable to non-controlling interests
Less earnings allocated to participating securities

Net income available for common stockholders, basic
Numerator:
Net income

Less earnings allocated to participating securities

Net income available for common stockholders, diluted
Denominator:
Denominator for basic EPS – weighted average common equivalent shares

OP Units
Performance-based restricted stock awards and LTIP Units
Stock options

Denominator for diluted EPS – weighted average common equivalent shares

71

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2022

2020

$

$

$

$

55,460  $
(3,591)
(378)
51,491  $

55,460  $
(378)
55,082  $

57,360  $
(3,852)
(355)
53,153  $

57,360  $
(355)
57,005  $

34,721 
(2,707)
(127)
31,887 

34,721 
(127)
34,594 

123,394,745 
8,566,343 
323,027 
820 
132,284,935 

119,544,749 
8,650,485 
250,585 
8,079 
128,453,898 

116,731,930 
9,785,334 
106,434 
3,299 
126,626,997 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings Per Unit

The following table sets forth the reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per unit for the Operating Partnership (in thousands, except unit data):

Numerator:
Net income

Less earnings allocated to participating securities

Net income available to unitholders, basic and diluted
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per unit – weighted average common equivalent units

Performance-based restricted stock awards and LTIP Units
Stock options

Denominator for diluted earnings per unit – weighted average common equivalent units

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2022

2020

$

$

55,460  $
(378)
55,082  $

57,360  $
(355)
57,005  $

34,721 
(127)
34,594 

131,961,088 
323,027 
820 
132,284,935 

128,195,234 
250,585 
8,079 
128,453,898 

126,517,264 
106,434 
3,299 
126,626,997 

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is more fully described in Note 8.

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plan based on the FASB guidance which requires that compensation expense be recognized based
on the fair value of the stock awards less forfeitures. Restricted stock grants vest based upon the completion of a service period (“time-based restricted
stock  grants”)  and/or  the  Company  meeting  certain  pre-established  operational  performance  goals  and  market-indexed  financial  performance  criteria
(“performance-based  restricted  stock  grants”).  Time-based  restricted  stock  grants  are  valued  according  to  the  market  price  for  the  Company’s  common
stock at the date of grant. For performance-based restricted stock grants subject to market-indexed performance criteria, a Monte Carlo valuation model is
used, taking into account the underlying contingency risks associated with the performance criteria. All other performance-based restricted stock grants are
valued according to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. It is the Company’s policy to grant options with an exercise
price equal to the quoted closing market price of stock on the grant date.

The Company has made certain separate awards in the form of units of limited partnership interests in its Operating Partnership called LTIP Units (“LTIP
Units”). The LTIP Units are subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation committee may determine, including continued employment or
service,  achievement  of  pre-established  operational  performance  goals  and  market-indexed  performance  criteria.  For  the  LTIP  Units  subject  to  market-
indexed performance criteria (the “marked-indexed LTIP Units”), a Monte Carlo valuation model is used, taking into account the underlying contingency
risks  associated  with  the  performance  criteria.  All  other  LTIP  Units  (the  “operational  LTIP  Units”)  are  valued  according  to  the  market  price  of  the
Company’s common stock at the date of grant.

Awards of stock options, time-based restricted stock grants, performance-based restricted stock subject to operational performance goals, and operational
LTIP Units are expensed as compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Awards of performance-based restricted stock subject to
market-indexed  performance  criteria  and  market-indexed  LTIP  Units  are  expensed  as  compensation  under  the  accelerated  attribution  method  and  are
recognized in income regardless of the results of the performance criteria.

Derivatives

The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended
use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the
hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to
changes  in  the  fair  value  of  an  asset,  liability,  or  firm  commitment  attributable  to  a  particular  risk,  such  as  interest  rate  risk,  are  considered  fair  value
hedges.  Derivatives  designated  and  qualifying  as  a  hedge  of  the  exposure  to  variability  in  expected  future  cash  flows,  or  other  types  of  forecasted
transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the

72

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are
attributable to the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. When the Company terminates a derivative for which cash flow hedging was being
applied,  the  balance,  which  was  recorded  in  Other  comprehensive  income,  is  amortized  to  interest  expense  over  the  remaining  contractual  term  of  the
derivative as long as the hedged forecasted transactions continue to be probable of occurring. The Company includes cash payments made to terminate
interest  rate  derivatives  as  an  operating  activity  on  the  statement  of  cash  flows,  given  the  nature  of  the  underlying  cash  flows  that  the  derivative  was
hedging.

Segment Reporting

The Company’s primary business is the ownership, management, and redevelopment of retail real estate properties. The Company reviews operating and
financial  information  for  each  property  on  an  individual  basis  and  therefore,  each  property  represents  an  individual  operating  segment.  The  Company
evaluates  financial  performance  using  property  operating  income,  defined  as  operating  revenues  (rental  revenue  and  other  income),  less  property  and
related  expenses  (property  operating  expenses  and  property  taxes).  The  Company  has  aggregated  the  properties  into  one  reportable  segment  as  the
properties share similar long-term economic characteristics and have other similarities including the fact that they are operated using consistent business
strategies, are typically located in major metropolitan areas, and have similar tenant mixes.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Supplemental Disclosures

The following tables provides supplemental disclosures related to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

Supplemental disclosure of cash activities:

Cash paid on gross receipts and income for federal and state purposes
Interest paid

Other non-cash investing and financing activities increase (decrease):

Intangible lease liabilities
Interest rate swap liabilities
Accrued real estate improvement costs
Equity redemption of OP Units
Dividends and distributions payable

2.  Real Estate Investments

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2022

2020

$
$

$
$
$
$
$

386  $
56,642  $

30,981  $
(3,447) $
3,670  $
5,071  $
849  $

292  $
55,104  $

21,563  $
(6,064) $
7,122  $
6,858  $
24,219  $

324 
57,276 

— 
5,646 
5,346 
20,098 
336 

The following real estate investment transactions occurred during the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

The  Company  evaluated  the  following  acquisitions  and  determined  that  substantially  all  of  the  fair  value  related  to  each  of  the  acquisitions  was
concentrated in single identifiable assets. The Company allocated the total consideration for the acquisitions to the individual assets and liabilities acquired
on a relative fair value basis. All transaction costs incurred in the acquisitions were capitalized.

Property Asset Acquisitions in 2022

On April 1, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Olympia Square North, located in Olympia, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan
area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of  approximately  $18.4  million.  Olympia  Square  North  is  approximately  90,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by
Albertsons Supermarket. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

On April 1, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Powell Valley Junction, located in Gresham, Oregon, within the Portland metropolitan
area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of  approximately  $17.7  million.  Powell  Valley  Junction  is  approximately  109,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by
Walmart Neighborhood Market. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On May 17, 2022, the Company acquired the property known as Village Oaks Shopping Center, located in Martinez, California, within the San Francisco
metropolitan area, for an adjusted purchase price of approximately $24.1 million. Village Oaks Shopping Center is approximately 80,000 square feet and is
anchored by Save Mart (Lucky California) Supermarket. The property was acquired with cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

On August 19, 2022, the Company acquired two properties known as Ballinger Village, located in Shoreline, Washington, within the Seattle metropolitan
area,  and  Thomas  Lake  Shopping  Center  located  in  Mill  Creek,  Washington,  within  the  Seattle  metropolitan  area,  for  an  adjusted  purchase  price  of
approximately  $29.3  million  and  $31.1  million,  respectively.  Ballinger  Village  is  approximately  111,000  square  feet  and  is  anchored  by  Thriftway
Supermarket and Rite Aid Pharmacy. Thomas Lake Shopping Center is approximately 111,000 square feet and is anchored by Albertsons Supermarket and
Rite Aid Pharmacy. These properties were acquired by the Company using proceeds from the sale of one of its shopping centers, discussed below, as well
as cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility.

Property Asset Acquisitions in 2021

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company acquired four properties with a total of approximately 449,000 square feet as well as a single
tenant parcel contiguous to one of its existing shopping centers for a total adjusted purchase price of approximately $125.5 million.

The  financial  information  set  forth  below  summarizes  the  Company’s  purchase  price  allocation  for  property  assets  acquired  during  the  years  ended
December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 (in thousands):

Assets
Land
Building and improvements
Acquired lease intangible asset
Deferred charges

Assets acquired

Liabilities

Acquired lease intangible liability

Liabilities assumed

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

$

$

$

51,150  $
86,263 
8,745 
5,462 
151,620  $

30,981 
30,981  $

48,272 
85,125 
9,240 
4,416 
147,053 

21,563 
21,563 

The  following  table  summarizes  the  operating  results  included  in  the  Company’s  historical  consolidated  statement  of  operations  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2022, for property assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

Statement of operations:
Revenues
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Year Ended
December 31, 2022

$
$

6,450 
2,261 

The  following  table  summarizes  the  operating  results  included  in  the  Company’s  historical  consolidated  statement  of  operations  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2021, for property assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2021 (in thousands):

Statement of operations:
Revenues
Net income attributable to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

74

Year Ended
December 31, 2021

$
$

2,211 
587 

Property Dispositions in 2022

On  August  19,  2022,  in  connection  with  the  acquisitions  of  Ballinger  Village  and  Thomas  Lake  Shopping  Center  discussed  above,  the  Company  sold
Aurora  Square,  a  shopping  center  located  in  Shoreline,  Washington.  The  sales  price  of  $36.2  million,  less  costs  to  sell,  resulted  in  net  proceeds  of
approximately $34.4 million. The Company recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $7.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022
related to this property disposition.

Property Dispositions in 2021

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2021,  the  Company  sold  three  properties.  The  total  sales  price  of  approximately  $69.7  million,  less  costs  to  sell,
resulted in net proceeds of approximately $68.0 million. The Company recorded gains on sale of real estate of approximately $22.3 million during the year
ended December 31, 2021 related to these property dispositions.

Any reference to square footage or occupancy is unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s audit of
the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

3.  Acquired Lease Intangibles

Intangible assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Assets:
In-place leases

Accumulated amortization

Above-market leases

Accumulated amortization

Acquired lease intangible assets, net
Liabilities:
Below-market leases

Accumulated amortization

Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

$

$

70,133  $
(27,405)
21,307 
(11,607)
52,428  $

205,421  $
(53,304)
152,117  $

67,644 
(27,764)
21,632 
(11,373)
50,139 

188,607 
(51,999)
136,608 

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the net amortization of acquired lease intangible assets and acquired lease intangible liabilities for
above-  and  below-market  leases  was  $11.9  million,  $8.8  million  and  $17.7  million,  respectively,  which  amounts  are  included  in  Rental  revenue  in  the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the amortization
of  in-place  leases  was  $5.9  million,  $4.8  million  and  $7.7  million,  respectively,  which  amounts  are  included  in  Depreciation  and  amortization  in  the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The scheduled future amortization of acquired lease intangible assets as of December 31, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31:

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Total future amortization of acquired lease intangible assets

75

$

$

7,086 
5,827 
4,969 
4,084 
3,430 
27,032 
52,428 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The scheduled future amortization of acquired lease intangible liabilities as of December 31, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31:

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Total future amortization of acquired lease intangible liabilities

4.  Tenant Leases

$

$

12,144 
11,741 
11,036 
10,168 
9,531 
97,497 
152,117 

Space  in  the  Company’s  shopping  centers  is  leased  to  various  tenants  under  operating  leases  that  usually  grant  tenants  renewal  options  and  generally
provide for additional rents based on certain operating expenses as well as tenants’ sales volume.

Future minimum rents to be received under non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 2022 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31:

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Total minimum lease payments

$

$

215,035 
188,185 
160,405 
132,296 
103,100 
373,243 
1,172,264 

5.  Mortgage Notes Payable, Credit Facilities and Senior Notes

ROIC does not hold any indebtedness. All debt is held directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership; however, ROIC has guaranteed the Operating
Partnership’s unsecured term loan, unsecured revolving credit facility, carve-out guarantees on property-level debt, and the Senior Notes. Costs incurred in
obtaining long-term financing are amortized ratably over the related debt agreement. The amortization of deferred financing costs is included in Interest
expense and other finance expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

On  March  1,  2022,  the  Company  repaid  in  full  the  mortgage  note  related  to  Casitas  Plaza  Shopping  Center  for  a  total  of  approximately  $6.6  million,
without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note. Additionally, on March 31, 2022, the Company repaid in full the mortgage note
related to Riverstone Marketplace for a total of approximately $16.7 million without penalty, in accordance with the prepayment provisions of the note.

76

 
 
 
 
Mortgage Notes Payable

The mortgage notes payable collateralized by respective properties and assignment of leases at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively,
were as follows (in thousands, except interest rates):

Property
Casitas Plaza Shopping Center
Riverstone Marketplace
Fullerton Crossroads
Diamond Hills Plaza

Unamortized mortgage premiums
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Total mortgage notes payable

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

2022

2021

December 31,

June 2022
July 2022
April 2024
October 2025

5.320 % $
4.960 %
4.728 %
3.550 %

  $

—  $
— 
26,000 
34,731 
60,731 
288 
(102)
60,917  $

6,660 
16,811 
26,000 
35,393 
84,864 
632 
(142)
85,354 

The combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgage notes payable during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

2023
2024
2025
Thereafter

Total

Term Loan and Credit Facility 

Principal
Repayments

Scheduled
Amortization

Mortgage
Premium

Total

$

$

—  $

26,000 
32,787 
— 
58,787  $

686  $
708 
550 
— 
1,944  $

216  $
72 
— 
— 
288  $

902 
26,780 
33,337 
— 
61,019 

The carrying values of the Company’s unsecured term loan (the “term loan”) were as follows (in thousands):

Term loan
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Term loan

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

300,000  $
(747)
299,253  $

300,000 
(1,111)
298,889 

The Operating Partnership has an unsecured term loan (the “term loan”) with several banks under which the lenders agreed to provide a $300.0 million
unsecured term loan facility. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership entered into the First Amendment to First Amended and Restated
Term Loan Agreement (as amended, the “Term Loan Agreement”) pursuant to which the maturity date of the term loan was extended from September 8,
2022 to January 20, 2025, without further options for extension. The Term Loan Agreement also provides that the Operating Partnership may from time to
time request increased aggregate commitments of $200.0 million under certain conditions set forth in the Term Loan Agreement, including the consent of
the lenders for the additional commitments. Borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal
to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) a LIBOR rate determined by reference to the cost of funds for
U.S. dollar deposits for the relevant period (the “Eurodollar Rate”), or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate
plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank National Association as its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%.

77

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Operating Partnership has an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “credit facility”) with several banks. Effective December 20, 2019, the Operating
Partnership entered into the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Facility Agreement”) pursuant
to which the borrowing capacity under the credit facility is $600.0 million and the maturity date of the credit facility was extended from September 8, 2021
to February 20, 2024, with two six-month extension options, which may be exercised by the Operating Partnership upon satisfaction of certain conditions
including the payment of extension fees. Additionally, the Credit Facility Agreement contains an accordion feature, which allows the Operating Partnership
to increase the borrowing capacity under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $1.2 billion, subject to lender consents and other conditions. Borrowings
under the Credit Facility Agreement accrue interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate equal to an applicable rate based on the credit rating level
of the Company, plus, as applicable, (i) the Eurodollar Rate, or (ii) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus
0.50%, (b) the rate of interest announced by KeyBank National Association as its “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 0.90%. Additionally, the
Operating Partnership is obligated to pay a facility fee at a rate based on the credit rating level of the Company, currently 0.20%, and a fronting fee at a rate
of  0.125%  per  year  with  respect  to  each  letter  of  credit  issued  under  the  Credit  Facility  Agreement,  of  which  the  Operating  Partnership  had  none
outstanding  as  of  December  31,  2022.  The  Company  has  investment  grade  credit  ratings  from  Moody’s  Investors  Service  (Baa2),  S&P  Global  Ratings
(BBB-) and Fitch Ratings (BBB).

As of December 31, 2022, $88.0 million was outstanding under the credit facility, compared to no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2021. The
net  unamortized  deferred  financing  costs,  which  are  included  in  Deferred  charges,  net  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets,  were
approximately $1.0 million as of December 31, 2022 compared to approximately $1.9 million as of December 31, 2021.

The weighted average interest rate on the term loan during the year ended December 31, 2022 was 2.7%. As discussed in Note 11 of the accompanying
financial statements below, the Company has historically used interest rate swaps to help manage its interest rate risk. The Company’s four interest rate
swaps matured effective August 31, 2022, and accordingly the interest rate on the term loan was no longer effectively fixed and outstanding borrowings
under the term loan became subject to a variable interest rate, as detailed above, effective September 1, 2022. The weighted average interest rate on the
credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2022 was 3.1%. The Company had no available borrowings under the term loan at December 31, 2022.
The Company had $512.0 million available to borrow under the credit facility at December 31, 2022.

Senior Notes Due 2027

The carrying value of the Company’s unsecured Senior Notes Due 2027 is as follows (in thousands):

Principal amount
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Senior Notes Due 2027

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

250,000  $
(874)
249,126  $

250,000 
(1,050)
248,950 

On November 10, 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into a Note Purchase Agreement which provided for the issuance of $250.0 million principal
amount of 4.19% Senior Notes Due 2027 (the “Senior Notes Due 2027”) in a private placement effective December 15, 2017. The Senior Notes Due 2027
pay interest on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2018, and mature on December 15, 2027, unless prepaid earlier by the
Operating  Partnership.  The  Operating  Partnership’s  performance  of  the  obligations  under  the  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  including  the  payment  of  any
outstanding indebtedness thereunder, are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by ROIC.

78

 
 
Senior Notes Due 2026

The carrying value of the Company’s unsecured Senior Notes Due 2026 is as follows (in thousands):

Principal amount
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Senior Notes Due 2026

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

200,000  $
(289)
199,711  $

200,000 
(366)
199,634 

On  July  26,  2016,  the  Operating  Partnership  entered  into  a  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  as  amended,  which  provided  for  the  issuance  of  $200.0  million
principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes Due 2026 (the “Senior Notes Due 2026”) in a private placement effective September 22, 2016. The Senior Notes
Due 2026 pay interest on March 22 and September 22 of each year, commencing on March 22, 2017, and mature on September 22, 2026, unless prepaid
earlier  by  the  Operating  Partnership.  The  Operating  Partnership’s  performance  of  the  obligations  under  the  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  including  the
payment of any outstanding indebtedness thereunder, are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by ROIC.

Senior Notes Due 2024

The carrying value of the Company’s unsecured Senior Notes Due 2024 is as follows (in thousands):

Principal amount
Unamortized debt discount
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Senior Notes Due 2024

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

250,000  $
(802)
(432)
248,766  $

250,000 
(1,188)
(652)
248,160 

On  December  3,  2014,  the  Operating  Partnership  completed  a  registered  underwritten  public  offering  of  $250.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of
4.000% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “Senior Notes Due 2024”), fully and unconditionally guaranteed by ROIC. The Senior Notes Due 2024 pay interest
semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, commencing on June 15, 2015, and mature on December 15, 2024, unless redeemed earlier by the Operating
Partnership.  The  Senior  Notes  Due  2024  are  the  Operating  Partnership’s  senior  unsecured  obligations  that  rank  equally  in  right  of  payment  with  the
Operating  Partnership’s  other  unsecured  indebtedness,  and  effectively  junior  to  (i)  all  of  the  indebtedness  and  other  liabilities,  whether  secured  or
unsecured, and any preferred equity of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries, and (ii) all of the Operating Partnership’s indebtedness that is secured by its
assets,  to  the  extent  of  the  value  of  the  collateral  securing  such  indebtedness  outstanding.  ROIC  fully  and  unconditionally  guaranteed  the  Operating
Partnership’s  obligations  under  the  Senior  Notes  Due  2024  on  a  senior  unsecured  basis,  including  the  due  and  punctual  payment  of  principal  of,  and
premium,  if  any,  and  interest  on,  the  notes,  whether  at  stated  maturity,  upon  acceleration,  notice  of  redemption  or  otherwise.  The  guarantee  is  a  senior
unsecured obligation of ROIC and ranks equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of ROIC. ROIC’s guarantee of the Senior
Notes Due 2024 is effectively subordinated in right of payment to all liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, and any preferred equity of its subsidiaries
(including the Operating Partnership and any entity ROIC accounts for under the equity method of accounting).

79

 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes Due 2023

The carrying value of the Company’s unsecured Senior Notes Due 2023 is as follows (in thousands):

Principal amount
Unamortized debt discount
Net unamortized deferred financing costs

Senior Notes Due 2023

December 31,

2022

2021

$

$

250,000  $
(502)
(252)
249,246  $

250,000 
(998)
(515)
248,487 

On  December  9,  2013,  the  Operating  Partnership  completed  a  registered  underwritten  public  offering  of  $250.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of
5.000% Senior Notes due 2023 (the “Senior Notes Due 2023”), fully and unconditionally guaranteed by ROIC. The Senior Notes Due 2023 pay interest
semi-annually on June 15 and December 15, commencing on June 15, 2014, and mature on December 15, 2023, unless redeemed earlier by the Operating
Partnership.  The  Senior  Notes  Due  2023  are  the  Operating  Partnership’s  senior  unsecured  obligations  that  rank  equally  in  right  of  payment  with  the
Operating  Partnership’s  other  unsecured  indebtedness,  and  effectively  junior  to  (i)  all  of  the  indebtedness  and  other  liabilities,  whether  secured  or
unsecured, and any preferred equity of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries, and (ii) all of the Operating Partnership’s indebtedness that is secured by its
assets,  to  the  extent  of  the  value  of  the  collateral  securing  such  indebtedness  outstanding.  ROIC  fully  and  unconditionally  guaranteed  the  Operating
Partnership’s  obligations  under  the  Senior  Notes  Due  2023  on  a  senior  unsecured  basis,  including  the  due  and  punctual  payment  of  principal  of,  and
premium,  if  any,  and  interest  on,  the  notes,  whether  at  stated  maturity,  upon  acceleration,  notice  of  redemption  or  otherwise.  The  guarantee  is  a  senior
unsecured obligation of ROIC and will rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of ROIC. ROIC’s guarantee of the
Senior  Notes  Due  2023  is  effectively  subordinated  in  right  of  payment  to  all  liabilities,  whether  secured  or  unsecured,  and  any  preferred  equity  of  its
subsidiaries (including the Operating Partnership and any entity ROIC accounts for under the equity method of accounting).

The combined aggregate principal maturities of the Company’s unsecured senior notes payable during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in
thousands):

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Total

Principal Repayments
250,000 
$
250,000 
— 
200,000 
250,000 
— 
950,000 

$

80

 
 
Deferred Financing Costs

The unamortized balances of deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s term loan, Senior Notes Due 2027, Senior Notes Due 2026, Senior
Notes  Due  2024,  Senior  Notes  Due  2023,  and  mortgage  notes  payable,  included  as  a  direct  reduction  from  the  carrying  amount  of  the  related  debt
instrument in the consolidated balance sheets, and the unamortized balances of deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s unsecured revolving
credit facility, included in Deferred charges, net in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2022 that will be charged to future operations during
the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter

Financing Costs

2,008 
984 
300 
234 
170 
— 
3,696 

$

$

The  Operating  Partnership’s  debt  agreements  contain  customary  representations,  financial  and  other  covenants,  and  its  ability  to  borrow  under  these
agreements is subject to its compliance with financial covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis. The Company was in compliance with such
covenants at December 31, 2022.

6.  Preferred Stock of ROIC

The  Company  is  authorized  to  issue  50,000,000  shares  of  preferred  stock  with  such  designations,  voting  and  other  rights  and  preferences  as  may  be
determined  from  time  to  time  by  the  board  of  directors.  As  of  December  31,  2022  and  December  31,  2021,  there  were  no  shares  of  preferred  stock
outstanding.

7.  Common Stock of ROIC

ATM

On February 20, 2020, ROIC entered into an “at the market” sales agreement, as amended on April 27, 2022 (the “Sales Agreement”), with each of (i)
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BTIG, LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Regions Securities LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “Agents”) and (ii) the Forward Purchasers (as defined below), pursuant to which ROIC may sell, from time
to time, shares (any such shares, the “Primary Shares”) of ROIC’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), to or through the Agents
and instruct certain of the Agents, acting as forward sellers (the “Forward Sellers”), to offer and sell borrowed shares (any such shares, “Forward Hedge
Shares,” and collectively with the Primary Shares, the “Shares”) with the Shares to be sold under the Sales Agreement having an aggregate offering price of
up to $500.0 million.

The Sales Agreement contemplates that, in addition to the issuance and sale of Primary Shares to or through the Agents as principal or its sales agents,
ROIC may enter into separate forward sale agreements with any of KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., BofA Securities, Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC or their
respective affiliates (in such capacity, the “Forward Purchasers”). If ROIC enters into a forward sale agreement with any Forward Purchaser, ROIC expects
that such Forward Purchaser or its affiliate will borrow from third parties and, through the relevant Forward Seller, sell a number of Forward Hedge Shares
equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward sale agreement, in accordance with the mutually accepted instructions
related to such forward sale agreement. ROIC will not initially receive any proceeds from any sale of Forward Hedge Shares through a Forward Seller.
ROIC  expects  to  fully  physically  settle  each  particular  forward  sale  agreement  with  the  relevant  Forward  Purchaser  on  one  or  more  dates  specified  by
ROIC on or prior to the maturity date of that particular forward sale agreement by issuing shares of Common Stock (the “Confirmation Shares”), in which
case ROIC expects to receive aggregate net cash proceeds at settlement equal to the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the particular forward
sale  agreement  multiplied  by  the  relevant  forward  sale  price.  However,  ROIC  may  also  elect  to  cash  settle  or  net  share  settle  a  particular  forward  sale
agreement, in which case ROIC may not receive any proceeds from the

81

 
 
 
 
 
issuance of shares of Common Stock, and ROIC will instead receive or pay cash (in the case of cash settlement) or receive or deliver shares of Common
Stock (in the case of net share settlement).

During the three months ended December 31, 2022, ROIC did not sell any shares under the Sales Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2022,
ROIC sold a total of 1,288,213 shares under the Sales Agreement, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $25.2 million and commissions of
approximately $252,000 paid to the Agents.

Stock Repurchase Program

On July 31, 2013, ROIC’s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to a maximum of $50.0 million of the Company’s
common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock under this program.

8.  Stock Compensation and Other Benefit Plans for ROIC

ROIC follows the FASB guidance related to stock compensation which establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee
compensation plans, including all arrangements by which employees receive shares of stock or other equity instruments of the employer, or the employer
incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price of the employer’s stock. The guidance also defines a fair value-based method of accounting
for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument.

On April 25, 2022, the Company adopted the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) that
amended and restated the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”). The types of awards that may be granted under the Equity
Incentive Plan include stock options, restricted shares, share appreciation rights, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards.
The Equity Incentive Plan has a fungible unit system that counts the number of shares of the Company’s common stock used in the issuance of full-value
awards, such as restricted shares and LTIP Units, differently than the number of shares of common stock used in the issuance of stock options. A total of
10,954,694 Fungible Units (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan) are reserved for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan. The 10,954,694 Fungible Units
represent  a  maximum  of  5,002,143  shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock  that  could  be  granted  pursuant  to  the  Equity  Incentive  Plan  as  full-value
awards, such as restricted shares, based on the 2.19 to 1.0 Fungible Unit-to-full-value award conversion ratio. A maximum of 10,954,694 shares of the
Company’s common stock may be issued pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan if all grants made under the Equity Incentive Plan are granted as stock
options, based on a 1.0 to 1.0 Fungible Unit-to-stock option award conversion ratio. The Equity Incentive Plan will expire on April 25, 2032.

The Company has made under the Prior Plan, and may make under the Equity Incentive Plan, certain awards in the form of a separate series of units of
limited partnership interests in its Operating Partnership called LTIP Units. LTIP Units can be granted either as free-standing awards or in tandem with
other  awards  under  the  Equity  Incentive  Plan.  The  LTIP  Units  are  subject  to  such  conditions  and  restrictions  as  the  compensation  committee  may
determine,  including  continued  employment  or  service,  achievement  of  pre-established  operational  performance  goals  and  market-indexed  performance
criteria.  Upon  the  occurrence  of  specified  events  and  subject  to  the  satisfaction  of  applicable  vesting  conditions,  LTIP  Units  (after  conversion  into  OP
Units, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement) are ultimately redeemable for cash or at ROIC’s option, for shares of ROIC common stock on a one-
for-one basis.

Restricted Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2022, ROIC awarded 574,070 shares of restricted common stock under the Prior Plan, of which 192,464 shares are
performance-based grants and the remainder of the shares are time-based grants. The performance-based grants vest based on both pre-defined operational
and market-indexed performance criteria with a vesting date on January 1, 2025.

82

 
 
 
 
 
 
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2022, and changes during the year ended December 31,
2022 are presented below:

Non-vested as of December 31, 2021
Vested
Granted
Forfeited

Non-vested as of December 31, 2022

Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Shares

1,153,471  $
(402,795) $
574,070  $
(14,148) $
1,310,598  $

16.77 
16.42 
18.98 
17.11 

17.85 

As  of  December  31,  2022,  there  remained  a  total  of  approximately  $11.5  million  of  unrecognized  restricted  stock  compensation  expense  related  to
outstanding non-vested restricted stock grants awarded under the Prior Plan. Restricted stock compensation is expected to be expensed over a remaining
weighted average period of 1.7 years (irrespective of achievement of the performance conditions). The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during
the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was approximately $7.9 million, $5.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively.

LTIP Units

During the year ended December 31, 2022, 201,860 LTIP Units vested under the Prior Plan, issued at a weighted average grant date fair value of $16.35.
Vesting of the LTIP Units was based on the Company’s achievement of certain performance criteria during the performance period from January 1, 2019 to
December 31, 2021. Vested LTIP Units, after achieving parity with OP Units (as described in the Operating Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”)), are eligible to be converted into OP Units on a one-for-one basis upon the
satisfaction of conditions set forth in the Partnership Agreement. On January 18, 2022, 201,860 LTIP Units were converted by the Company into 201,860
OP Units upon satisfying such conditions. Upon conversion of LTIP Units into OP Units, holders are able to redeem their OP Units for cash or, at ROIC’s
option, for shares of ROIC common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Stock Based Compensation Expense

For  the  years  ended  December  31,  2022,  2021  and  2020,  the  amounts  charged  to  expense  for  all  stock  based  compensation  arrangements  totaled
approximately $11.9 million, $11.0 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

Profit Sharing and Savings Plan

During 2011, the Company established a profit sharing and savings plan (the “401K Plan”), which permits eligible employees to defer a portion of their
compensation  in  accordance  with  the  Code.  Under  the  401K  Plan,  the  Company  made  matching  contributions  on  behalf  of  eligible  employees.  The
Company made contributions to the 401K Plan of approximately $97,000, $95,000 and $89,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020,
respectively.

9. Capital of the Operating Partnership

As of December 31, 2022, the Operating Partnership had 132,985,928 OP Units outstanding. ROIC owned an approximate 93.6% interest in the Operating
Partnership at December 31, 2022, or 124,538,811 OP Units. The remaining 8,447,117 OP Units are owned by other limited partners. A share of ROIC’s
common stock and an OP Unit have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and distributions of
the Operating Partnership.

As  of  December  31,  2022,  subject  to  certain  exceptions,  holders  are  able  to  redeem  their  OP  Units  for  cash  or,  at  ROIC’s  option,  for  shares  of  ROIC
common stock on a one-for-one basis. If cash is paid in the redemption, the redemption price is equal to the average closing price on the NASDAQ Stock
Market for shares of ROIC’s common stock over the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date a redemption notice is received by ROIC.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, ROIC received notices of redemption for a total of 296,840 OP Units. ROIC elected to redeem the 296,840 OP
Units for shares of ROIC common stock on a one-for-one basis, and accordingly, 296,840 shares of ROIC common stock were issued.

83

 
 
 
 
 
The redemption value of outstanding OP Units owned by the limited partners as of December 31, 2022, not including ROIC, had such units been redeemed
at December 31, 2022, was approximately $126.8 million, calculated based on the average closing price of ROIC’s common stock on the NASDAQ Stock
Market for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding December 31, 2022, which amounted to $15.01 per share.

Retail  Opportunity  Investments  GP,  LLC,  ROIC’s  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  is  the  sole  general  partner  of  the  Operating  Partnership,  and  as  the  parent
company, ROIC has the full and complete authority over the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management and control. As the sole general partner of the
Operating Partnership, ROIC effectively controls the ability to issue common stock of ROIC upon redemption of any OP Units. The redemption provisions
that permit ROIC to settle the redemption of OP Units in either cash or common stock, in the sole discretion of ROIC, are further evaluated in accordance
with applicable accounting guidance to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet is appropriate. The Company
evaluated this guidance, including the ability, in its sole discretion, to settle in unregistered shares of common stock, and determined that the OP Units meet
the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity.

10.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The  Company  follows  the  FASB  guidance  that  defines  fair  value,  establishes  a  framework  for  measuring  fair  value,  and  expands  disclosures  about  fair
value  measurements.  The  guidance  applies  to  reported  balances  that  are  required  or  permitted  to  be  measured  at  fair  value  under  existing  accounting
pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.

The guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should
be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant
assumptions in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the
reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Level  1  inputs  utilize  quoted  prices  (unadjusted)  in  active  markets  for  identical  assets  or  liabilities  that  the  Company  has  the  ability  to  access.  Level  2
inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted
prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where
the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
Company’s  assessment  of  the  significance  of  a  particular  input  to  the  fair  value  measurement  in  its  entirety  requires  judgment,  and  considers  factors
specific to the asset or liability.

The  following  disclosures  of  estimated  fair  value  were  determined  by  management,  using  available  market  information  and  appropriate  valuation
methodologies  as  discussed  in  Note  1.  Considerable  judgment  is  necessary  to  interpret  market  data  and  develop  estimated  fair  value. Accordingly,  the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts realizable upon disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market
assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant and other receivables, deposits, prepaid expenses, other assets, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying values of the term
loan  and  credit  facility  are  deemed  to  be  at  fair  value  since  the  outstanding  debt  is  directly  tied  to  monthly  LIBOR  contracts.  The  fair  value  of  the
outstanding Senior Notes Due 2027 and Senior Notes Due 2026 at December 31, 2022 was approximately $223.3 million and $181.8 million, respectively,
calculated using significant inputs which are not observable in the market, or Level 3. The fair value of the outstanding Senior Notes Due 2024 and Senior
Notes Due 2023 at December 31, 2022 was approximately $241.5 million and $248.8 million, respectively, based on inputs not quoted on active markets,
but  corroborated  by  market  data,  or  Level  2.  Assumed  mortgage  notes  payable  were  recorded  at  their  fair  value  at  the  time  they  were  assumed.  The
Company’s outstanding mortgage notes payable were estimated to have a fair value of approximately $57.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of
7.3% as of December 31, 2022. These fair value measurements fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

84

 
 
 
 
 
 
11.  Derivative and Hedging Activities

The  Company’s  objectives  in  using  interest  rate  derivatives  are  to  add  stability  to  interest  expense  and  to  manage  its  exposure  to  interest  rate
movements.  To  accomplish  this  objective,  the  Company  has  historically  used  interest  rate  swaps  as  part  of  its  interest  rate  risk  management
strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company
making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

The changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”)
and are subsequently reclassified into earnings during the period in which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash
flows of the derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based
inputs, including interest rate curves, and implied volatilities. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of
netting  the  discounted  future  fixed  cash  receipts  (or  payments)  and  the  discounted  expected  variable  cash  payments  (or  receipts).  The  variable  cash
payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. 

The Company incorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own non-performance risk and the respective counterparties’ non-
performance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contract for the effect of non-performance risk, the Company
considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit
valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default
by the Company and its counterparties. However, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall
valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Company determined that its derivative valuation in its entirety was classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s four interest rate swaps that effectively fixed the interest rate on the Company’s term loan matured effective August 31, 2022.

The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which those measurements fall (in thousands):

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets and
Liabilities
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)

Total

December 31, 2021:
Liabilities

Derivative financial instruments

$

—  $

(3,447) $

—  $

(3,447)

Amounts paid, or received, to cash settle interest rate derivatives prior to their maturity date are recorded in AOCI at the cash settlement amount, and will
be  reclassified  to  interest  expense  as  interest  expense  is  recognized  on  the  hedged  debt.  During  the  next  twelve  months,  the  Company  estimates  that
approximately $15,000 will be reclassified as a non-cash decrease to interest expense related to the Company’s previously cash-settled swap arrangements.

85

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  table  below  presents  the  fair  value  of  the  Company’s  derivative  financial  instruments  as  well  as  their  classification  on  the  balance  sheet  as  of
December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively (in thousands):

Derivatives designed as hedging instruments
Interest rate products

Balance sheet location

Other liabilities

$

December 31, 2022 Fair
Value

December 31, 2021 Fair
Value

—  $

(3,447)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

The table below details the location in the financial statements of the gain or loss recognized on interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for
the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively (in thousands):

Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives
Amount of loss reclassified from AOCI into interest

12.  Commitments and Contingencies

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2022

2020

$
$

1,104  $
2,286  $

216  $
5,894  $

(9,925)
4,572 

In the normal course of business, from time to time, the Company is involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of its properties. In
management’s opinion, the liabilities, if any, that ultimately may result from such legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

The  Company  has  signed  several  ground  leases  in  which  the  Company  is  the  lessee  for  the  land  beneath  all  or  a  portion  of  the  buildings  for  certain
properties.  As  of  December  31,  2022,  the  Company’s  net  lease  liability  of  approximately  $16.7  million,  which  is  included  in  Other  liabilities  in  the
accompanying  balance  sheets,  and  related  net  right-to-use  asset  of  approximately  $15.1  million,  which  is  included  in  Other assets in the accompanying
balance sheets, represents all operating leases in which the Company is a lessee. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s weighted average remaining
lease term is approximately 35.8 years and the weighted average discount rate used to calculate the Company’s lease liability is approximately 5.2%. Rent
expense under the Company’s ground leases was approximately $1.7 million, $1.6 million, and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021,
and 2020, respectively.

The following table represents a reconciliation of the Company’s undiscounted future minimum annual lease payments under operating leases to the lease
liability as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter
Total undiscounted future minimum lease payments
Future minimum lease payments, discount

Lease liability

Tax Protection Agreements

Operating Leases

1,345 
1,351 
1,356 
1,376 
1,404 
28,872 
35,704 
(18,968)
16,736 

$

$

In  connection  with  certain  acquisitions  from  September  2013  through  March  2017,  the  Company  entered  into  Tax  Protection  Agreements  with  certain
limited  partners  of  the  Operating  Partnership.  The  Tax  Protection  Agreements  require  the  Company,  subject  to  certain  exceptions,  to  indemnify  the
respective sellers receiving OP Units against certain tax liabilities incurred by them, as calculated pursuant to the respective Tax Protection Agreements, for
a period of 12 years (with respect to Tax Protection Agreements entered into in September 2013), or 10 years (with respect to Tax Protection Agreements
entered into

86

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
from December 2014 through March 2017) from the date of the Tax Protection Agreements. If the Company were to trigger the tax protection provisions
under  these  agreements,  the  Company  would  be  required  to  pay  damages  in  the  amount  of  the  taxes  owed  by  these  limited  partners  (plus  additional
damages in the amount of the taxes incurred as a result of such payment).

13.  Related Party Transactions

The  Company  has  entered  into  several  lease  agreements  with  an  officer  of  the  Company,  whereby  pursuant  to  the  lease  agreements,  the  Company  is
provided the use of storage space. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Company incurred approximately $95,000, $85,000 and
$84,000,  respectively,  of  expenses  relating  to  the  agreements  which  were  included  in  General  and  administrative  expenses  in  the  accompanying
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

14.  Subsequent Events

On February 14, 2023, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock and a distribution on the Operating Partnership’s
OP Units of $0.15 per share and per OP Unit, payable on April 7, 2023 to holders of record on March 17, 2023.

87

 
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2022
(in thousands)

Initial Cost to Company

Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

Amount at Which

Carried at Close of Period  

 Description and Location

 Encumbrances

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

Total (a)

Accumulated
Depreciation (b)
(1)

Date of
Acquisition

$

—  $
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

6,347  $
7,895 
1,881 
3,087 
6,359 
11,678 

10,274  $
9,890 
4,795 
12,397 
6,927 
27,011 

822  $
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

1,414  $
4,018 
1,543 
(348)
842 
4,950 

7,169  $
7,895 
1,881 
3,087 
6,359 
11,678 

11,688  $
13,908 
6,338 
12,049 
7,769 
31,961 

18,857  $
21,803 
8,219 
15,136 
14,128 
43,639 

4,744 
5,249 
2,750 
4,137 
3,009 
11,817 

3,233 
6,647 
3,256 
4,861 
10,021 
6,341 
5,553 
9,397 
12,295 
8,432 
5,612 
5,786 

12/22/2009
1/26/2010
2/1/2010
3/16/2010
4/8/2010
7/14/2010

8/20/2010
9/23/2010
9/23/2010
9/30/2010
12/16/2010
12/22/2010
12/22/2010
1/3/2011
1/6/2011
2/17/2011
8/3/2011
7/8/2011

2,653 
1,969 
4,009 
383 
1,149 
5,601 
7,668 
7,482 
9,702 
6,551 
3,214 
1,008 

8,853 
6,595 
6,158 
3,747 
5,917 
3,714 
— 
13,429 
14,288 
8,960 
8,640 
6,487 

10,385 
19,368 
5,028 
11,967 
28,447 
13,928 
15,441 
29,733 
46,267 
25,312 
17,062 
18,349 

19,238 
25,963 
11,186 
15,714 
34,364 
17,642 
15,441 
43,162 
60,555 
34,272 
25,702 
24,836 

8,307 

9,352 

24,223 

33,575 

9,127 

7/29/2011

4,265 
3,252 
4,683 
966 

1,999 
4,122 
2,971 
416 
2,674 
1,164 
14,803 
2,160 
558 
6,115 

5,334 
5,693 
— 
6,242 

8,815 
5,098 
5,329 
5,859 
4,181 
5,529 
14,965 
15,605 
16,362 
16,506 

24,959 
24,118 
22,236 
24,428 

8,796 
21,286 
7,383 
9,174 
18,068 
16,021 
31,965 
13,979 
14,183 
16,642 

30,293 
29,811 
22,236 
30,670 

17,611 
26,384 
12,712 
15,033 
22,249 
21,550 
46,930 
29,584 
30,545 
33,148 

7,937 
7,800 
8,079 
7,506 

3,603 
6,027 
1,605 
3,196 
5,248 
4,915 
8,126 
4,684 
4,498 
3,693 

9/8/2011
9/30/2011
11/23/2011
2/16/2012

5/4/2012
5/31/2012
7/24/2012
8/1/2012
2010/2012
10/5/2012
11/8/2012
12/7/2012
12/28/2012
12/28/2012

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

8,853 
6,595 
5,975 
3,747 
5,917 
3,706 
— 
13,420 
14,288 
8,517 
8,640 
6,487 

9,352 

5,334 
5,693 
— 
6,242 

8,815 
5,098 
5,329 
5,847 
4,181 
5,454 
14,965 
15,480 
16,242 
16,506 

7,732 
17,399 
1,019 
11,584 
27,298 
8,327 
7,773 
22,251 
36,565 
18,761 
13,848 
17,341 

15,916 

20,694 
20,866 
17,553 
23,462 

6,797 
17,164 
4,412 
8,758 
15,394 
14,857 
17,162 
11,819 
13,625 
10,527 

— 
— 
183 
— 
— 
8 
— 
9 
— 
443 
— 
— 

— 

— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
12 
— 
75 
— 
125 
120 
— 

88

Paramount Plaza, CA
Santa Ana Downtown Plaza, CA
Meridian Valley Plaza, WA
The Market at Lake Stevens, WA
Pleasant Hill Marketplace, CA
Happy Valley Town Center, OR
Cascade Summit Town Square,
OR
Heritage Market Center, WA
Claremont Promenade, CA
Sycamore Creek, CA
Gateway Village, CA
Division Crossing, OR
(2)
Halsey Crossing, OR 
Marketplace Del Rio, CA
Pinole Vista Shopping Center, CA
Desert Springs Marketplace, CA
Renaissance Towne Centre, CA
Country Club Gate Center, CA
Canyon Park Shopping Center,
WA
Hawks Prairie Shopping Center,
WA
The Kress Building, WA
Hillsboro Market Center, OR 
Gateway Shopping Center, WA 
Marlin Cove Shopping Center,
CA
Seabridge Marketplace, CA
The Village at Novato, CA
Glendora Shopping Center, CA
Wilsonville Old Town Square, OR
Bay Plaza, CA
Santa Teresa Village, CA
Cypress Center West, CA
Redondo Beach Plaza, CA
Harbor Place Center, CA

(2)

(2)

 
 
 
 
 
 Description and Location

 Encumbrances

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

Total (a)

Accumulated
Depreciation (b)
(1)

Date of
Acquisition

Initial Cost to Company

Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

Amount at Which

Carried at Close of Period  

(2)

Diamond Bar Town Center, CA
Bernardo Heights Plaza, CA
Canyon Crossing, WA
Diamond Hills Plaza, CA
Granada Shopping Center, CA
Hawthorne Crossings, CA
Robinwood Shopping Center, OR
5 Points Plaza, CA
Crossroads Shopping Center, WA
Peninsula Marketplace, CA
Country Club Village, CA
(2)
Plaza de la Canada, CA 
Tigard Marketplace, OR
Creekside Plaza, CA
North Park Plaza, CA
Fallbrook Shopping Center, CA 
Moorpark Town Center, CA
Mission Foothill Marketplace
Pads, CA
Wilsonville Town Center, OR
Park Oaks Shopping Center, CA
Ontario Plaza, CA
Winston Manor, CA
Jackson Square, CA
Tigard Promenade, OR
Sunnyside Village Square, OR
Gateway Centre, CA
Johnson Creek Center, OR
Iron Horse Plaza, CA
Bellevue Marketplace, WA
Four Corner Square, WA
Warner Plaza, CA
Magnolia Shopping Center, CA
Casitas Plaza Shopping Center,
CA
Bouquet Center, CA
North Ranch Shopping Center,
CA
Monterey Center, CA 
Rose City Center, OR 

(2)

(2)

— 
— 
— 
34,731 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

9,540 
3,192 
7,941 
15,458 
3,673 
10,383 
3,997 
17,920 
68,366 
14,730 
9,986 
10,351 
13,587 
14,807 
13,593 
21,232 
7,063 

3,996 
10,334 
8,527 
9,825 
10,018 
6,886 
9,844 
4,428 
16,275 
9,009 
8,187 
10,488 
9,926 
16,104 
12,501 

10,734 
10,040 

31,522 
1,073 
3,637 

16,795 
8,940 
24,659 
29,353 
13,459 
29,277 
11,317 
36,965 
67,756 
19,214 
26,579 
24,819 
9,603 
29,476 
17,733 
186,197 
19,694 

11,051 
27,101 
38,064 
26,635 
9,762 
24,558 
10,843 
13,324 
28,308 
22,534 
39,654 
39,119 
31,415 
60,188 
27,040 

22,040 
48,362 

95,916 
10,609 
10,301 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
18 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
83 
— 

14 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
11 
— 
36 
— 
154 

— 
18 

— 
— 
— 

89

4,452 
573 
2,238 
4,377 
6,615 
355 
565 
5,310 
36,687 
1,225 
1,084 
1,300 
308 
7,401 
3,323 
7,907 
629 

617 
1,698 
381 
1,384 
1,944 
863 
291 
2,531 
3,682 
1,115 
2,964 
10,434 
490 
11,209 
1,998 

1,505 
887 

2,676 
679 
(105)

9,540 
3,192 
7,941 
15,458 
3,673 
10,383 
4,015 
17,920 
68,366 
14,730 
9,986 
10,351 
13,587 
14,807 
13,593 
21,315 
7,063 

4,010 
10,334 
8,527 
9,825 
10,018 
6,886 
9,844 
4,428 
16,275 
9,009 
8,198 
10,488 
9,962 
16,104 
12,655 

10,734 
10,058 

31,522 
1,073 
3,637 

21,247 
9,513 
26,897 
33,730 
20,074 
29,632 
11,882 
42,275 
104,443 
20,439 
27,663 
26,119 
9,911 
36,877 
21,056 
194,104 
20,323 

11,668 
28,799 
38,445 
28,019 
11,706 
25,421 
11,134 
15,855 
31,990 
23,649 
42,618 
49,553 
31,905 
71,397 
29,038 

23,545 
49,249 

98,592 
11,288 
10,196 

30,787 
12,705 
34,838 
49,188 
23,747 
40,015 
15,897 
60,195 
172,809 
35,169 
37,649 
36,470 
23,498 
51,684 
34,649 
215,419 
27,386 

15,678 
39,133 
46,972 
37,844 
21,724 
32,307 
20,978 
20,283 
48,265 
32,658 
50,816 
60,041 
41,867 
87,501 
41,693 

34,279 
59,307 

130,114 
12,361 
13,833 

7,800 
3,041 
9,081 
8,563 
3,533 
7,978 
3,344 
11,320 
27,962 
5,343 
7,433 
6,861 
3,278 
9,217 
5,289 
48,129 
4,721 

2,460 
7,334 
9,068 
7,435 
3,023 
5,752 
2,477 
4,235 
6,751 
5,449 
9,095 
10,781 
7,153 
14,881 
6,280 

2/1/2013
2/6/2013
4/15/2013
4/22/2013
6/27/2013
6/27/2013
8/23/2013
9/27/2013
2010/2013
11/1/2013
11/26/2013
12/13/2013
2/18/2014
2/28/2014
4/30/2014
6/13/2014
12/4/2014

12/4/2014
12/11/2014
1/6/2015
1/6/2015
1/7/2015
7/1/2015
7/28/2015
7/28/2015
9/1/2015
11/9/2015
12/4/2015
12/10/2015
12/21/2015
12/31/2015
3/10/2016

4,658 
9,275 

3/10/2016
4/28/2016

18,037 
2,212 
1,840 

6/1/2016
7/14/2016
9/15/2016

 
 
 
 
 
 Description and Location

 Encumbrances

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

 Land

Building &
Improvements

Total (a)

Accumulated
Depreciation (b)
(1)

Date of
Acquisition

Initial Cost to Company

Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to Acquisition

Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period

The Knolls, CA
Bridle Trails Shopping Center,
WA
Torrey Hills Corporate Center,
CA
PCC Community Markets Plaza,
WA
The Terraces, CA
Santa Rosa Southside Shopping
Center, CA
Division Center, OR
Highland Hill Shopping Center,
WA
Monta Loma Plaza, CA
Fullerton Crossroads, CA
Riverstone Marketplace, WA
North Lynnwood Shopping
Center, WA
The Village at Nellie Gail Ranch,
CA
Stadium Center, WA
King City Plaza, OR
Summerwalk Village, WA
Canyon Creek Plaza, CA
Palomar Village, CA
South Point Plaza, WA
Olympia West Center, WA
Powell Valley Junction, OR
Olympia Square North, WA
Village Oaks Shopping Center,
CA
Thomas Lake Shopping Center,
WA
Ballinger Village, WA

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 
— 

— 
— 
26,000 
— 

— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

— 
— 

9,726 

11,534 

5,579 

1,856 
18,378 

5,595 
6,912 

10,511 
18,226 
28,512 
5,113 

4,955 

22,730 
1,699 
5,161 
4,312 
13,067 
9,642 
18,465 
5,716 
6,334 
6,005 

10,757 

16,380 
11,696 

18,299 

20,700 

3,915 

6,914 
37,103 

24,453 
26,098 

37,825 
11,113 
45,419 
27,594 

10,335 

22,578 
17,229 
10,072 
7,567 
13,455 
26,925 
25,491 
18,378 
15,685 
15,999 

19,626 

18,685 
16,268 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 
— 

66 
— 
— 
— 

21 

— 
45 
— 
— 
— 
— 
3 
— 
— 
— 

— 

— 
6 

121 

9,726 

18,420 

28,146 

3,486 

10/3/2016

9,704 

11,534 

30,404 

41,938 

6,253 

10/17/2016

2,011 

5,579 

5,926 

11,505 

2,636 

12/6/2016

7 
1,690 

1,856 
18,378 

11,994 
7,157 

2,908 
215 
1,062 
789 

5,595 
6,912 

10,577 
18,226 
28,512 
5,113 

6,921 
38,793 

36,447 
33,255 

40,733 
11,328 
46,481 
28,383 

8,777 
57,171 

42,042 
40,167 

51,310 
29,554 
74,993 
33,496 

1,334 
6,811 

5,324 
5,323 

6,409 
1,810 
7,542 
4,501 

1/25/2017
3/17/2017

3/24/2017
4/5/2017

5/9/2017
9/19/2017
10/11/2017
10/11/2017

5,189 

4,976 

15,524 

20,500 

2,452 

10/19/2017

1,924 
116 
460 
3,012 
24 
1,014 
2,175 
17 
599 
4 

22,730 
1,744 
5,161 
4,312 
13,067 
9,642 
18,468 
5,716 
6,334 
6,005 

24,502 
17,345 
10,532 
10,579 
13,479 
27,939 
27,666 
18,395 
16,284 
16,003 

47,232 
19,089 
15,693 
14,891 
26,546 
37,581 
46,134 
24,111 
22,618 
22,008 

4,066 
2,272 
1,445 
973 
783 
1,289 
1,258 
744 
367 
391 

11/30/2017
2/23/2018
5/18/2018
12/13/2019
9/1/2021
10/12/2021
11/10/2021
12/6/2021
4/1/2022
4/1/2022

166 

10,757 

19,792 

30,549 

387 

5/17/2022

3 
57 

16,380 
11,702 

18,688 
16,325 

35,068 
28,027 

245 
219 

8/19/2022
8/19/2022

$

60,731  $ 955,964  $

2,146,584  $

2,272  $

306,273  $ 958,236  $

2,452,857  $ 3,411,093  $

578,593 

90

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a. RECONCILIATION OF REAL ESTATE – OWNED SUBJECT TO OPERATING LEASES (in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period:
Property improvements during the year
Properties acquired during the year
Properties sold during the year
Assets written off during the year

Balance at end of period:

2022

2020

Year Ended December 31,
2021
$ 3,266,155  $ 3,156,552  $ 3,131,841 
38,913 
— 
— 
(14,202)
$ 3,411,093  $ 3,266,155  $ 3,156,552 

55,086 
134,706 
(30,995)
(13,859)

48,570 
136,105 
(61,491)
(13,581)

b. RECONCILIATION OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period:
Depreciation expenses
Properties sold during the year
Property assets fully depreciated and written off

Balance at end of period:

$

$

Year Ended December 31,
2021
460,165  $
82,957 
(18,476)
(13,810)
510,836  $

2022
510,836  $
86,354 
(4,112)
(14,485)
578,593  $

2020
390,916 
83,774 
— 
(14,525)
460,165 

(1) Depreciation and investments in building and improvements reflected in the consolidated statements of operations is calculated over the estimated

useful life of the assets as follows:

Building:  39-40 years
Property Improvements:  10-20 years 

(2) Property, or a portion thereof, is subject to a ground lease.

(3) The aggregate cost for Federal Income Tax Purposes for real estate was approximately $3.1 billion at December 31, 2022.

91

 
 
 
 
 
 
SCHEDULE IV – MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2022
(in thousands)

a. RECONCILIATION OF MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE (in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period:
Repayments on mortgage note receivable

Balance at end of period:

Year Ended December 31,
2021

2020

2022

$

$

4,875  $
(89)
4,786  $

4,959  $
(84)
4,875  $

13,000 
(8,041)
4,959 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures (Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)

ROIC  maintains  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  that  are  designed  to  ensure  that  information  required  to  be  disclosed  in  its  reports  filed  under  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive
Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  as  appropriate,  to  allow  timely  decisions  regarding  required  disclosure.  In  designing  and  evaluating  the  disclosure
controls and procedures, ROIC’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable  assurance  of  achieving  the  desired  control  objectives,  and  its  management  is  required  to  apply  its  judgment  in  evaluating  the  cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures.

ROIC’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based on their evaluation of ROIC’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, have concluded that as of the end of the period
covered  by  this  report,  ROIC’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were  effective  to  give  reasonable  assurances  to  the  timely  collection,  evaluation  and
disclosure  of  information  relating  to  ROIC  that  would  potentially  be  subject  to  disclosure  under  the  Exchange  Act  and  the  rules  and  regulations
promulgated thereunder.

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022,  there  was  no  change  in  ROIC’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is
reasonably likely to materially affect, ROIC’s internal control over financial reporting.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures (Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)

The Operating Partnership maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, the Operating Partnership’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and its management is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

The  Company’s  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  based  on  their  evaluation  of  the  Operating  Partnership’s  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)  under  the  Exchange  Act)  required  by  paragraph  (b)  of  Rule  13a-15  or  Rule  15d-15,  have
concluded  that  as  of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report,  the  Operating  Partnership’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were  effective  to  give
reasonable  assurances  to  the  timely  collection,  evaluation  and  disclosure  of  information  relating  to  the  Operating  Partnership  that  would  potentially  be
subject to disclosure under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

92

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2022, there was no change in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.)

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of ROIC’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, ROIC conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 based on the
framework  in  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (2013
Framework). Based on that evaluation, Management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect  misstatements.  Projections  of  any  evaluation  of
effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in its report which appears on page 54 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP)

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of ROIC, the Operating Partnership conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting  as  of  December  31,  2022  based  on  the  framework  in  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on that evaluation, Management concluded that its internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect  misstatements.  Projections  of  any  evaluation  of
effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in ROIC’s or the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-
15(f)) that occurred during its most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial
reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

Item 9C.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III

Information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2022.

93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2022.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2022.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2022.

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2022.

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule

(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedule

PART IV

Please refer to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

(a)(3) 

2.1

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

4.1

4.2

4.3

Articles of Merger, by and between Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Delaware corporation, and Retail Opportunity Investments
Corp., a Maryland corporation, as survivor, dated as of June 1, 2011 

(2)

Exhibits

Articles of Amendment and Restatement 

(2)

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws 

(25)

Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, by and among Retail
Opportunity Investments GP, LLC as general partner, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the other limited partners thereto, dated as
of September 27, 2013 

(5)

Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP, dated as of December 4, 2015 

(10)

Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP, dated as of December 10, 2015 

(10)

Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP, dated as of December 31, 2015 

(10)

Fifth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP,
dated as of March 10, 2016 

(11)

Sixth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP,
dated as of March 24, 2017 

(14)

Seventh Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP, dated as of October 11, 2017 

(16)

Specimen Unit Certificate

 (1)

Specimen Common Stock Certificate

 (1)

Indenture,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP  and  Wells  Fargo  Bank,
National Association, dated as of December 9, 2013 

(6)

94

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

First  Supplemental  Indenture,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.  and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated as of December 9, 2013

 (6)

5.000% Senior Notes due 2023 of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, guaranteed by Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.,
dated as of December 9, 2013 

(7)

Second Supplemental Indenture, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (including Form of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2024 of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership,
LP, guaranteed by Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.), dated as of December 3, 2014

 (8)

Description of Securities 

(21)

2009 Equity Incentive Plan 

(1)

Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan 

(19)

Second Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan 

(24)

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan 

(1)

Form of Option Award Agreement under 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan 

(1)

Letter Agreement, by and between Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and Richard A. Baker, dated as of April 2, 2012 

(3)

Letter Agreement, by and between Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and Laurie Sneve, dated as of October 24, 2012 

(4)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(5)
protected partners identified therein, dated as of September 27, 2013 

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(5)
protected partners identified therein, dated as of September 27, 2013 

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein, dated as of September
27, 2013 

(5)

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein, dated as of September
27, 2013 

(5)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(9)
protected partners identified therein, dated as of December 11, 2014 

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holder named therein, dated as of December
11, 2014 

(9)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(10)
protected partners identified therein, dated as of December 4, 2015 

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein, dated as of December
4, 2015 

(10)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(10)
protected partners identified therein, dated as of December 10, 2015 

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holders named therein, dated as of December
10, 2015 

(10)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
(10)
protected partner identified therein, dated as of December 31, 2015 

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holder named therein, dated as of December
31, 2015 

(10)

Tax Protection Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and the
protected partner identified therein, dated as of March 10, 2016 

(11)

95

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

10.30

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34

10.35

10.36

Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and the holder named therein, dated as of March 10,
2016 

(11)

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2017, by and between the Company and Stuart A. Tanz 

(13)

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2017, by and between the Company and Richard K. Schoebel 

(13)

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2017, by and between the Company and Michael B. Haines 

(13)

First Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., as the Parent Guarantor, Retail
Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the Borrower, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, BMO Capital Markets
and  Regions  Bank,  as  Co-Syndication  Agents,  Capital  One,  National  Association,  as  Documentation  Agent,  and  the  other  lenders  party
thereto, dated as of September 8, 2017 

(15)

First  Amendment  to  First  Amended  and  Restated  Term  Loan  Agreement,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  as  the
Parent  Guarantor,  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  as  the  Borrower,  KeyBank  National  Association,  as  Administrative
Agent, BMO Capital Markets and Regions Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, Capital One, National Association, as Documentation Agent,
and the other lenders party thereto, dated as of December 20, 2019 

(20)

Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2020, by and among Retail Opportunity
Investments  Corp.,  as  the  Parent  Guarantor,  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  as  the  Borrower,  KeyBank  National
Association, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto 

(23)

Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  as  the  guarantor,  and  Retail
Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the borrower, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender
and L/C Issuer, PNC Bank National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents and the other lenders party
thereto, dated as of September 8, 2017 

(15)

First  Amendment  to  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  as  the
guarantor, and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the borrower, KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent,
Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, PNC Bank National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents and
the other lenders party thereto, dated as of December 20, 2019 

(20)

Second  Amendment  to  Second  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  Agreement,  dated  as  of  July  29,  2020,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity
Investments Corp., as the guarantor, and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, as the borrower, KeyBank National Association,
as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto 

(23)

Amended  and  Restated  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  dated  as  of  September  22,  2016,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments
Partnership, LP, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp and the purchasers named therein 

(12)

First Amendment, dated as of September 8, 2017 to the Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2016,
by and among Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp and the purchasers named therein 

(17)

Third Amendment, dated as of July 29, 2020 to the Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2016, by
and among Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp and the purchasers named therein 

(23)

Note  Purchase  Agreement,  dated  as  of  November  10,  2017,  by  and  among  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  Retail
Opportunity Investments Corp. and the purchasers named therein 

(18)

First  Amendment,  dated  as  of  July  29,  2020  to  the  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  dated  as  of  November  10,  2017,  by  and  among  Retail
Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp and the purchasers named therein 

(23)

Sales Agreement, dated February 20, 2020, by and among the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Agents and the Forward Purchasers
(22)

96

21.1*

23.1*

23.2*

31.1*

31.2*

List of Subsidiaries of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP for Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP for Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.1**

Certifications pursuant to Section 1350

101 SCH

101 CAL

101 DEF

101 LAB

101 PRE

104

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

Inline Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, formatted in Inline XBRL (and contained in
Exhibit 101)

________________________

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2009.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2011.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 25, 2014.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2014.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 25, 2015.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 24, 2016.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2016.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed on October 26,
2016.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2017 filed on April 27, 2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2017 filed on October 25,
2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2017.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2018.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2019.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 19, 2020.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2020.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2020.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2022.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2022.

(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished with this report.
+ Unless otherwise noted, all exhibits have File No. 001-33479.

97

 
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

98

 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

Date: February 16, 2023

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Registrant
By:  /s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Stuart A. Tanz
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

99

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Stuart A. Tanz and Michael B.
Haines,  and  each  of  them,  with  full  power  to  act  without  the  other,  such  person’s  true  and  lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  with  full  power  of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Form 10-K and any and all
amendments  thereto,  and  to  file  the  same,  with  exhibits  and  schedule  thereto,  and  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

/s/ Richard A. Baker
Richard A. Baker
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Stuart A. Tanz
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Michael B. Haines
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Laurie A. Sneve
Laurie A. Sneve
Chief Accounting Officer

/s/ Angela K. Ho
Angela K. Ho
Director

/s/ Michael J. Indiveri
Michael J. Indiveri
Director

/s/ Zabrina M. Jenkins
Zabrina M. Jenkins
Director

/s/ Lee S. Neibart
Lee S. Neibart
Director

100

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

/s/ Adrienne B. Pitts
Adrienne B. Pitts
Director

/s/ Laura H. Pomerantz
Laura H. Pomerantz
Director

/s/ Eric S. Zorn
Eric S. Zorn
Director

101

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

Date: February 16, 2023

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP, by Retail
Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, its sole general partner
Registrant

By:  /s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Stuart A. Tanz
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

102

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Stuart A. Tanz and Michael B.
Haines,  and  each  of  them,  with  full  power  to  act  without  the  other,  such  person’s  true  and  lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  with  full  power  of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Form 10-K and any and all
amendments  thereto,  and  to  file  the  same,  with  exhibits  and  schedule  thereto,  and  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

/s/ Richard A. Baker
Richard A. Baker
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Stuart A. Tanz
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Michael B. Haines
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 

/s/ Laurie A. Sneve
Laurie A. Sneve
Chief Accounting Officer

/s/ Angela K. Ho
Angela K. Ho
Director

/s/ Michael J. Indiveri
Michael J. Indiveri
Director

/s/ Zabrina M. Jenkins
Zabrina M. Jenkins
Director

/s/ Lee S. Neibart
Lee S. Neibart
Director

103

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

Date: February 16, 2023

/s/ Adrienne B. Pitts
Adrienne B. Pitts
Director

/s/ Laura H. Pomerantz
Laura H. Pomerantz
Director

/s/ Eric S. Zorn
Eric S. Zorn
Director

104

 
 
 
 
 
 
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.

EXHIBIT 21.1

Jurisdiction of 
Organization

Company
Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP
Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC
ROIC Paramount Plaza, LLC
ROIC Santa Ana, LLC
ROIC Washington, LLC
ROIC Oregon, LLC
ROIC California, LLC
ROIC Crossroads GP, LLC
ROIC Crossroads LP, LLC
ROIC Pinole Vista, LLC
ROIC Hillsboro, LLC
ROIC Cypress West, LLC
ROIC Redondo Beach Plaza, LLC
ROIC DBTC, LLC
Terranomics Crossroads Associates, LP
SARM Five Points Plaza, LLC
ROIC Robinwood, LLC
ROIC Creekside Plaza, LLC
ROIC Park Oaks, LLC
ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC
ROIC Warner Plaza, LLC
ROIC Four Corner Square, LLC
ROIC Bouquet Center, LLC
ROIC Monterey, LLC
ROIC IGAP, LLC
ROIC TUO, LLC
Sunhill Properties, LLC
Uhlmann-Burbank, LLC
ROIC Fullerton Crossroads, LLC

Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
California
Washington
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
California
California
Delaware

 
 
 
EXHIBIT 23.1

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(1) Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1/MEF on Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-146777), and the related

Prospectus, of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.,

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-198974), and the related Prospectus, of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.,

(3) Registration Statement (Form S-3 ASR No. 333-210413), and the related Prospectus, of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.,

(4) Registration Statement (Form S-3 ASR No. 333-264510), and the related Prospectus, of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, and

(5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-269041) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan

of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.

of our reports dated February 16, 2023, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Retail Opportunity Investments
Corp.  and  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Corp.,  included  in  this  Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2022.

San Diego, California
February 16, 2023

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

EXHIBIT 23.2

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  ASR  No.  333-264510-01)  of  Retail  Opportunity
Investments Corp. and Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 16, 2023,
with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedules  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  Partnership,  LP,  included  in  this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2022.                    

San Diego, California
February 16, 2023

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

EXHIBIT 31.1

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Stuart A. Tanz, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the

financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal

control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Name:  Stuart A. Tanz
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Stuart A. Tanz, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the

financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal

control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Name:  Stuart A. Tanz
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 31.2

RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael B. Haines, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the

financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal

control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Name:  Michael B. Haines
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael B. Haines, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Retail Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the

financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal

control over financial reporting.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Name:  Michael B. Haines
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 32.1

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on
the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-
K  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2022  (the  “Form  10-K”),  filed  concurrently  herewith  by  the  Company,  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Name:  Stuart A. Tanz
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on
the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Name:  Michael B. Haines
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission release 33-8238 dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement
of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, LP
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The  undersigned,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments  GP,  LLC,  the  sole  general  partner  of  Retail  Opportunity  Investments
Partnership, LP (the “Operating Partnership”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-
K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Operating Partnership, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Operating Partnership.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Stuart A. Tanz
Name:  Stuart A. Tanz
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Retail Opportunity Investments GP, LLC, the sole general partner of Retail Opportunity Investments
Partnership, LP (the “Operating Partnership”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-
K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Operating Partnership, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Operating Partnership.

Date: February 16, 2023

By:

/s/ Michael B. Haines
Name:  Michael B. Haines
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission release 33-8238 dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed
by  the  Operating  Partnership  for  purposes  of  Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended  or  incorporated  by  reference  in  any
registration statement of the Operating Partnership filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Operating Partnership and will be retained by the Operating
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.