Retail Properties of America, Inc.
Annual Report 2015

Plain-text annual report

2 0 1 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2015 ANNUAL REPORT vision | execution | results As a relatively young publicly traded company, it is to be expected that the velocity of change experienced by RPAI will exceed that of our more mature peers. We all know that positive change goes hand in hand with opportunity, but only if the change is properly embraced. For that reason, I’m very proud of what we accomplished in 2015. This past year we effectuated a companywide estate veteran Bonnie Biumi, and Dennis realignment effort that impacted every Holland, our esteemed General Counsel, business function. In connection with this announced his retirement. effort, we recruited Tim Steffan, formerly of Macerich, as president of our eastern division, Amidst all of this change, we made and we promoted Gerry Wright to president of tremendous strides toward achieving our our western division. Heath Fear, formerly VISION of owning a best-in-class and of General Growth Properties, Inc., joined geographically concentrated portfolio, our us as our new Chief Financial Officer, and EXECUTION was impressive as we once Julie Swinehart assumed the role of Chief again met or exceeded expectations, and Accounting Officer. We made a fantastic our operational and transactional RESULTS addition to our Board of Directors with real speak for themselves. Our corporate vision statement endeavors We continue to establish a track record to define our compass and touchstone: of success. We have consistently met or leaders experienced RPAI’s talented team of individuals is and committed to providing value for all of the Company’s stakeholders the by proactively managing Company’s portfolio through a geographically concentrated approach, consistently delivering on its operational and financial goals while positioning the Company for long-term growth through prudent capital allocation. high-quality exceeded expectations since our initial listing in 2012, and 2015 was no different. We posted full-year same-store NOI growth of 2.9% and Operating FFO of $1.06 per share. Operationally, we signed leases on over 2.7 million square feet of space achieving blended comparable re- leasing spreads of nearly 9%, a record high for RPAI. From an investment perspective, we traded over $500 million of assets with an ABR per square foot of approximately $12 and an embedded rent growth profile of 60 basis points for nearly $500 million of assets with an ABR per square foot of approximately $22 and an embedded rent growth profile of 130 basis points. We continued to bolster our balance sheet as we issued our first investment-grade unsecured bonds and we received commitments to upsize, reprice and extend our term As the CEO of RPAI, it is my job to ensure loan and revolver, while maintaining that our corporate vision statement our net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio at is more than a collection of carefully 5.8x and increasing our unencumbered selected words. At RPAI, our corporate NOI to 58%. By all accounts, this was an vision statement is a call to action, as well exceptional year for RPAI, showcasing our as the lens through which our employees will, determination and ability to execute view and evaluate themselves, their peers on our strategy to build a focused, best- and their respective contributions. in-class portfolio to drive long-term value for our shareholders. T O T A L S T O C K P E R F O R M A N C E n r u t e R l a t o T d e x e d n I $250 $230 $210 $190 $170 $150 $130 $110 $90 4/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15 9/15 12/15 RPAI Bloomberg REIT Shopping Center Index MSCI US REIT Index (RMS) Standard & Poor’s 500 Index Cumulative Total Stockholder Returns for RPAI’s Class A Common Stock versus the Bloomberg REIT Shopping Center Index, MSCI US REIT Index (RMS) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index during the period beginning April 5, 2012, the date of the initial listing of RPAI’s Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, through December 31, 2015. The graph assumes a $100 investment in each of the indices on April 5, 2012 and the reinvestment of all dividends. Source: Bloomberg As a result of our efforts in 2015, our portfolio quality and risk profile continue to improve, which is evident in our ABR, demographics, tenancy, asset diversification and long-term NOI growth profile. Our ABR per square foot is over $16 for our portfolio and over $18 in our target markets. Our multi-tenant retail five-mile demographic profile consists of a weighted average population of 260,000 and weighted average household income of $88,000. Our portfolio has made a significant shift towards lifestyle/mixed-use, which represents 26% of our multi-tenant retail portfolio, with inline sales of approximately $500 per square foot. Over 40% of our multi-tenant retail properties are anchored or shadow- anchored by a traditional grocery tenant, with grocer sales of approximately $530 per square foot. Lastly, we continued to acquire assets with a long-term NOI growth profile in the 3% range. To conclude, I would like to thank the Board of Directors and our employees for their continued support and dedication. I applaud our team’s commitment and effort towards driving long-term value for our shareholders, and thank them for their unwavering efforts. Our pulse on the business has never been stronger, and we look forward to continued EXECUTION on our VISION and delivering RESULTS in 2016. Steven P. Grimes President & Chief Executive Officer UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35481 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 42-1579325 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 2021 Spring Road, Suite 200, Oak Brook, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) 60523 (Zip Code) (630) 634-4200 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value 7.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $.001 par value Name of each exchange on which registered New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of class None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No As of June 30, 2015, the aggregate market value of the Class A common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $3.3 billion based upon the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2015 of $13.93 per share. (For this computation, the Registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of Class A common stock reported as beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the Registrant. Such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an affiliate of the Registrant.) Number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of February 12, 2016: Class A common stock: 237,260,967 shares DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain information contained in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 26, 2016 is incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III. The Registrant intends to file such Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities PART II Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation PART III Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules SIGNATURES PART IV 1 3 17 17 19 19 20 22 23 48 51 108 108 110 110 110 110 110 110 111 114 All dollar amounts and share amounts in this Form 10-K in Items 1. through 7A. are stated in thousands with the exception of per share amounts. In this report, all references to “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Retail Properties of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries. PART I Item 1. Business General Retail Properties of America, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) and is one of the largest owners and operators of high quality, strategically located shopping centers in the United States. As of December 31, 2015, we owned 198 retail operating properties representing 28,930,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). Our retail operating portfolio includes (i) power centers, (ii) neighborhood and community centers, and (iii) lifestyle centers and multi-tenant retail-focused mixed-use properties, as well as single-user retail properties. The following table summarizes our operating portfolio as of December 31, 2015: Property Type Operating portfolio: Multi-tenant retail Power centers Neighborhood and community centers Lifestyle centers and mixed-use properties Total multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Total retail operating portfolio Office Total operating portfolio (a) Includes leases signed but not commenced. Number of Properties GLA (in thousands) Occupancy Percent Leased Including Leases Signed (a) 52 85 14 151 47 198 1 199 11,973 10,527 5,214 27,714 1,216 28,930 895 29,825 96.1% 92.9% 90.5% 93.8% 100.0% 94.1% 100.0% 94.3% 97.0% 93.9% 90.8% 94.7% 100.0% 94.9% 100.0% 95.1% In addition to our operating portfolio, we owned one development property that was not under active development as of December 31, 2015. Operating History We are a Maryland corporation formed in March 2003 and have been publicly held and subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting requirements since 2003. We were initially formed as Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and on March 8, 2012, we changed our name to Retail Properties of America, Inc. Business Objectives and Strategies In 2012, management began a long-term portfolio repositioning effort to focus the portfolio on high quality, multi-tenant retail properties. The core objective of this effort is to become a dominant owner of multi-tenant retail properties in 10 to 15 target markets, owning 3,000,000 to 5,000,000 square feet in each market. We believe that concentrating our portfolio in multi-tenant retail properties in these target markets will allow us to optimize our local and regional operating platforms and enhance our operating performance. To date, we have identified 10 target markets: Dallas, Washington, D.C./Baltimore, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Chicago, Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix and Austin, which generally feature one or more of the following characteristics: • well-diversified local economy; • • • strong demographic profile with significant long-term population growth or above-average existing density, low relative cost-of living and/or a highly educated employment base; fiscal and regulatory environment conducive to business activity and growth; strong barriers to entry, whether topographical, regulatory or density driven; and 1 • ability to create critical mass and realize operational efficiencies. Since the beginning of 2012, we have sold 113 properties, primarily in our non-target markets, for aggregate consideration of $1,756,593, including our pro rata share of unconsolidated joint ventures and two development properties, one of which had been held in a consolidated joint venture, with a majority of the proceeds used for debt reduction and the acquisition of high quality, multi-tenant retail assets within our target markets. Since we began executing on our external growth initiatives in the fourth quarter of 2013, we have purchased 23 properties for aggregate consideration of $1,006,803, including our pro rata share of unconsolidated joint ventures, resulting in an increase in consolidated GLA in our target markets by 3.5 million square feet and an increase in concentration to over 60% of multi-tenant retail annualized base rent (ABR) from our target markets as of December 31, 2015. Competition In seeking new investment opportunities, we compete with other real estate investors, including other REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, foreign investors, real estate partnerships, private equity funds, private individuals and other real estate companies, some of which may have a lower cost of capital than ours. From an operational perspective, we compete with other property owners on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, location, visibility, quality and aesthetic value of construction, and strength and name recognition of tenants. These factors combine to determine the level of occupancy and rental rates that we are able to achieve at our properties. Because our revenue potential may be linked to the success of retailers, we indirectly share exposure to the same competitive factors that our retail tenants experience when trying to attract customers. These factors include other forms of retailing, including e-commerce and direct consumer sales, and general competition from other regional shopping centers. To remain competitive, we evaluate all of the factors affecting our centers and work to position them accordingly. We believe the principal factors that retailers consider in making their leasing decisions include: • • • consumer demographics; quality, design and location of properties; diversity of retailers within individual shopping centers; • management and operational expertise of the landlord; and • rental rates. Based on these factors, we believe that the size and scope of our property portfolio and operating platform, as well as the overall quality and attractiveness of our individual properties, enable us to compete effectively for retail tenants. We believe that our long- term strategy of focusing on 10 to 15 target markets enhances our ability to drive revenue growth by more thoroughly understanding the local market dynamics and by increasing our market relevancy. Tax Status We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to U.S. federal income tax on the taxable income we distribute to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate tax rates. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income, property or net worth and U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income. We have one wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary that has jointly elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A TRS is taxed on its net income at regular corporate tax rates. The income tax expense incurred through the TRS has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Regulation General The properties in our portfolio, including common areas, are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations. 2 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Our properties must comply with Title III of the ADA to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” as defined by the ADA. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to allow access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. We believe our existing properties are substantially in compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to incur significant capital expenditures to address the requirements of the ADA. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for more information regarding compliance with the ADA. Environmental Matters Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or release of hazardous substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under or from such property, including costs for investigation, remediation, natural resource damages or third party liability for personal injury or property damage. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or release of such materials, and the liability may be joint and several. Independent environmental consultants conducted Phase I Environmental Site Assessments or similar environmental audits for all of our investment properties. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is a written report that identifies existing or potential environmental conditions associated with a particular property. These environmental site assessments generally involve a review of records and visual inspection of the property, but do not include soil sampling or ground water analysis. These environmental site assessments have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material effect on our operations. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for more information regarding environmental matters. Insurance We carry comprehensive liability and property insurance coverage inclusive of fire, extended coverage, earthquake, terrorism and loss of income insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under a blanket policy. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. We believe that the properties in our portfolio are adequately insured. Terrorism insurance is carried on all properties in an amount and with deductibles that we believe are commercially reasonable. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for more information. The terrorism insurance is subject to exclusions for loss or damage caused by nuclear substances, pollutants, contaminants and biological and chemical weapons. Insurance coverage is not provided for losses attributable to riots or certain acts of God. Employees As of December 31, 2015, we had 240 employees. Access to Company Information We make available, free of charge, through our website and by responding to requests addressed to our investor relations group, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports and proxy statements filed or furnished pursuant to 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practical after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. Our website address is www.rpai.com. The information contained on our website, or other websites linked to our website, is not part of this document. Our reports may also be obtained by accessing the EDGAR database at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Shareholders wishing to communicate directly with our board of directors or any committee can do so by writing to the attention of the Board of Directors or applicable committee in care of Retail Properties of America, Inc. at 2021 Spring Road, Suite 200, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523. Item 1A. Risk Factors In evaluating our company, careful consideration should be given to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information included in this annual report. Each of these risk factors could adversely affect our business operating results and/or financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of our common stock, preferred stock or unsecured debt. In addition to the following disclosures, please refer to the other information contained in this report including the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related notes. 3 RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OUR PROPERTIES There are inherent risks associated with real estate investments and with the real estate industry, each of which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and the value of our properties. Real estate investments are subject to various risks, many of which are beyond our control. Our operating and financial performance and the value of our properties can be affected by many of these risks, including the following: • • • • • • • • • national, regional and local economies, which may be negatively impacted by inflation, deflation, government deficits, high unemployment rates, decreased consumer confidence, industry slowdowns, reduced corporate profits, liquidity and other adverse business conditions; local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of retail space or a reduction in demand for retail space, resulting in vacancies or compromising our ability to rent space on favorable terms; the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing options such as the internet; adverse changes in the financial condition of tenants at our properties, including financial difficulties, lease defaults or bankruptcies; competition for investment opportunities from other real estate investors with significant capital, including other REITs, real estate operating companies and institutional investment funds; the illiquid nature of real estate investments, which may limit our ability to sell properties at the terms desired or at terms favorable to us; fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of financing, which could adversely affect our ability and the ability of potential buyers and tenants of our properties, to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all; changes in, and changes in the enforcement of, laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws, government fiscal policies and the ADA; and civil unrest, acts of war, terrorist attacks and natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, which may result in uninsured and underinsured losses. During a period of economic slowdown or recession, declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults among our existing leases, and, consequently, our properties may fail to generate revenues sufficient to meet operating, debt service and other expenses. As a result, we may have to borrow funds to cover fixed costs, and our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. As such, the per share trading prices of our Class A common stock and Series A preferred stock, as well as the market price of our debt securities, and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by poor economic or market conditions where our properties are located, especially in the state of Texas where we have a high concentration of properties. We are in the process of repositioning our portfolio into 10 to 15 target markets. To date, we have announced 10 of these markets, of which four are located in Texas where recent and potential future fluctuations in oil prices may adversely impact local economies. The economic conditions in markets where our properties are concentrated greatly influence our financial condition and results of operations. We are particularly susceptible to adverse economic and other developments in such areas, including increased unemployment, industry slowdowns, corporate layoffs or downsizing, relocations of businesses, decreased consumer confidence, adverse changes in demographics, increases in real estate and other taxes, increased regulation and natural disasters. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 24.7% of our GLA and approximately 27.1% of our ABR in our retail operating portfolio was in the state of Texas. More specifically, approximately 13.9% of our GLA and approximately 17.6% of our ABR in our retail operating portfolio is located in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington area, which is our largest market. As such, poor economic or market conditions in Texas, particularly in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington area, and in other markets in which our properties are concentrated may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. 4 A shift in retail shopping from brick and mortar stores to online shopping may have an adverse impact on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Many retailers operating brick and mortar stores have made online sales a vital piece of their business. Although many of the retailers operating in our properties sell groceries and other necessity-based soft goods or provide services, including entertainment and dining options, the shift to online shopping may cause certain of our tenants to reduce the size or number of their retail locations in the future. As a result, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. We may choose to not renew leases or be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire. In addition, rents associated with new or renewed leases may be less than expiring rents (lease roll-down) or, to facilitate leasing, we may choose to incur significant capital expenditures to improve our properties, which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Approximately 5.1% of the total GLA in our retail operating portfolio was vacant as of December 31, 2015, excluding leases signed but not commenced. In addition, leases accounting for approximately 29.2% of the ABR in our retail operating portfolio as of December 31, 2015 are scheduled to expire between 2016 and 2018. We may choose to not renew leases based on various strategic factors such as operating strength of the occupying tenant or its retail category, merchandising composition of the property or other leasing opportunities available to us. In our efforts to lease space, we compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of retail properties, many of whom own properties similar to, and in the same sub-markets as our properties. As a result, we cannot assure you that leases will be renewed or that current or future vacancies will be re-leased at rental rates equal to or above the current average rental rates without significant down time, or that substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, lease inducements, early termination rights or below-market renewal options will not be offered to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants. Additionally, we may incur significant capital expenditures or accommodate requests for renovations and other improvements to make our properties more attractive to tenants. If we choose to not renew leases or are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire and rents associated with new or renewed leases are less than expiring rents or we incur significant capital expenditures to improve our properties, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Our inability to collect rents from tenants or collect balances due on our leases from any tenants in bankruptcy may negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Substantially all of our income is derived from rentals of real property. If sales generated by stores operating in our properties decline sufficiently or if tenants encounter other significant financial hardships, tenants may be unable to pay their existing minimum rents or other charges, or tenants may decline to extend or renew a lease upon its expiration on terms favorable to us, or at all, or may even exercise early termination rights (to the extent available). If a significant number of our tenants are unable to make their rental payments to us or otherwise meet their lease obligations, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In addition, although minimum rent is generally supported by long-term lease contracts, tenants who file bankruptcy have the legal right to reject any or all of their leases and close related stores. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our properties files bankruptcy and rejects its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues and we may not be able to collect all pre-petition amounts owed by that party, which may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. If any of our anchor tenants experience a downturn in their business or terminate their leases, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Anchor tenants occupy a significant amount of the square footage and pay a significant portion of the total rent in our retail operating portfolio. Specifically, our 20 largest tenants based on ABR represent 40.3% of GLA and 33.9% of ABR as of December 31, 2015. In addition, anchor tenants and “shadow” anchors, retailers in or adjacent to our properties that occupy space we do not own, contribute to the success of other tenants by drawing customers to a property. The bankruptcy, insolvency or downturn in business of one of our anchor tenants could result in another tenant vacating its space, defaulting on its lease obligations, terminating its lease or renewing its lease at lower rental rates. As a result, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. If small shop tenants are not successful and, consequently, terminate their leases, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Small shop tenants, those that occupy less than 10,000 square feet, in our retail operating portfolio represent 28.9% of GLA, but 41.3% of ABR as of December 31, 2015. Such tenants generally have more limited resources than larger tenants and, as a result, 5 may be more vulnerable to negative economic conditions. If a significant number of our small shop tenants experience financial difficulties or are unable to remain open, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Many of the leases at our retail properties contain provisions, which, if triggered, may allow tenants to pay reduced rent, cease operations or terminate their leases, any of which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Some anchor tenants have the right to vacate their space and continue to pay rent through the end of their lease term, which inhibits our ability to re-lease the space during that period. Additionally, many of the leases at our retail properties contain provisions that condition a tenant’s obligation to remain open, the amount of rent payable by the tenant or potentially the tenant’s obligation to remain in the lease, depending on certain factors, including: (i) the presence and continued operation of a certain anchor tenant or tenants, (ii) minimum occupancy levels at the applicable property or (iii) tenant sales amounts. If such a provision is triggered by a failure of any of these or other applicable conditions, a tenant could have the right to cease operations at the applicable property, have its rent reduced or terminate its lease early. A tenant ceasing operations as a result of these provisions could cause a decrease in customer traffic and related decreased sales for other tenants at that property. To the extent these provisions result in lower revenue, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Our expenses may remain constant or increase, even if income from our properties decreases, causing our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations to be adversely affected. Certain costs associated with our business, such as real estate taxes, state and local taxes, insurance, utilities, mortgage payments and corporate expenses, are relatively inflexible and generally do not decrease when a property is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, a tenant fails to pay rent or other circumstances cause our revenues to decrease. If we are unable to reduce our operating costs in response to revenue declines, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, inflationary or other price increases could result in increased operating costs, and increases in assessed valuations or changes in tax rates could result in increased real estate taxes for us and our tenants, and to the extent to which we are unable to recover such increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes from tenants, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. We depend on external sources of capital that are outside of our control, which may affect our ability to execute on strategic opportunities, satisfy our debt obligations and make distributions to our shareholders. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are generally required under the Code to annually distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. In addition, as a REIT, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs (including redevelopment and acquisition activities, payments of principal and interest on our existing debt, tenant improvements and leasing costs) from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may rely on third party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain the necessary capital on favorable terms, in the time period we desire, or at all. Additional debt we incur may increase our leverage, expose us to the risk of default and may impose operating restrictions on us, and any additional equity we raise could be dilutive to existing shareholders. Our access to third party sources of capital depends, in part, on general market conditions, the market’s view of the quality of our assets, operating platform and growth potential, our current debt levels, and our current and expected future earnings, cash flow and distributions to our shareholders. If we cannot obtain capital from third party sources, we may be unable to acquire or develop properties when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our principal and interest obligations or make cash distributions to our shareholders necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We may be unable to sell a property at the time we desire on favorable terms or at all, which could limit our ability to access capital through dispositions and could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. A key component of our strategic plan is to pursue targeted dispositions. However, real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers, increases in market capitalization rates and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties, and we cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. As a result of the uncertainty of market conditions, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to sell properties at a profit, or at all. In addition, and subject to certain safe harbor provisions, the Code generally imposes a 100% tax on gain recognized by REITs upon the disposition of assets if the assets are held primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, rather than for investment, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be 6 attractive from a pre-tax perspective. Accordingly, our ability to access capital through dispositions may be limited, which could limit our ability to fund future capital needs. We may be unable to complete acquisitions and even if acquisitions are completed, our operating results at acquired properties may not meet our financial expectations. A key component of our strategic plan is to execute our investment strategy of acquiring high quality, multi-tenant retail assets within our target markets. We continue to evaluate the market of available properties and expect to continue to acquire properties when we believe strategic opportunities exist. Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully operate or develop them is subject to the following risks: • we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other real estate investors with substantial capital, including other REITs, real estate operating companies and institutional investment funds; • even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other potential acquirers may significantly increase the purchase price; • we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with the evaluation and negotiation of potential acquisitions, including ones that are subsequently not completed; • we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms and in the time period we desire, or at all; • we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly the acquisition of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations; • we may acquire properties that are not initially accretive to our results upon acquisition, and we may not successfully manage and lease those properties to meet our expectations; and • we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse to former owners, with respect to unknown liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants or other persons to former owners of the properties and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties. If we are unable to acquire properties on favorable terms, obtain financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms, or operate acquired properties to meet our financial expectations, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Future joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority. As of December 31, 2015, we had no properties held in joint ventures. Any joint venture arrangements in which we may engage in the future could be subject to various risks including, among others: (i) lack of exclusive control over the joint venture, which may prevent us from taking actions that are in our best interest, (ii) future capital constraints of our partners, which may force us to contribute more capital than we anticipated to cover the joint venture’s liabilities, (iii) actions by our partners that could jeopardize our REIT status or the tax status of the joint venture, requiring us to pay taxes or subject properties owned by the joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by the terms of the joint venture agreements, and (iv) disputes between us and our partners, which may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and require our officers and/or directors to focus a disproportionate amount of their time and effort on the joint venture. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Development and redevelopment activities have inherent risks, which could adversely impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2015, we do not have any active development projects but we anticipate engaging in redevelopment activities within our portfolio in 2016. In addition to the risks associated with real estate investments in general as described elsewhere, the risks associated with future development and redevelopment activities include: • • expenditure of capital and time on projects that may never be completed; failure or inability to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all; 7 • • • higher than estimated construction or operating costs, including labor and material costs; inability to complete construction and lease-up on schedule due to a number of factors, including weather, labor disruptions, construction delays, delays or failure to receive zoning or other regulatory approvals, acts of terror or other acts of violence, or acts of God (such as fires, earthquakes or floods); significant time lag between commencement and stabilization subjecting us to delayed returns and greater risks due to fluctuations in the general economy, shifts in demographics and competition; and • occupancy and rental rates at a newly completed project that may not meet expectations. If any of the above events were to occur, the development or redevelopment of the properties may hinder our growth and may have an adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new development and significant redevelopment activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management. We are subject to litigation that may negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to our business. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or proceedings. A significant unfavorable outcome could negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. A number of properties in our portfolio are subject to ground leases; if we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or are unable to renew a ground lease, we could be materially and adversely affected. We have 14 properties in our portfolio that are either completely or partially on land that is owned by third parties and leased to us pursuant to ground leases. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold or similar interest in those properties. If we are found to be in breach of a ground lease and that breach cannot be cured, we could lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate the property. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or extend the terms of these leases before or at their expiration, as to which no assurance can be given, we will lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate these properties. Assuming that we exercise all available options to extend the terms of our ground leases, all of our ground leases will expire between 2048 and 2107. However, in certain cases, our ability to exercise such options is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise our options at such time. If we were to lose the right to operate a property due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground lease, we would be unable to derive income from such property, which could materially and adversely affect us. Uninsured losses or losses in excess of insurance coverage could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Each tenant is responsible for insuring its goods and demised premises and, in most circumstances, is required to reimburse us for a share of the cost of acquiring comprehensive insurance for the property, including casualty, liability, fire and extended coverage customarily obtained for similar properties in amounts which have been determined as sufficient to cover reasonably foreseeable losses. Tenants with a net lease typically are required to pay all insurance costs associated with their space. However, material losses may occur in excess of insurance proceeds with respect to any property and, specific to net leases, tenants may fail to obtain adequate insurance. Additionally, losses of a catastrophic nature including loss due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, wind, other natural disasters, pollution or environmental matters may be considered uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. In the instance of a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, a significant portion of the capital invested in the damaged property could be lost, as well as the anticipated future revenue of the property, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. A variety of factors, including, among others, changes in building codes and ordinances and environmental considerations, might also make it impractical or undesirable to use insurance proceeds to replace a property after it has been damaged or destroyed. Furthermore, we may be unable to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable costs in the future, as the costs associated with property and casualty renewals may be higher than anticipated. A number of our properties are located in areas which are susceptible to, and could be significantly affected by, natural disasters that could cause significant damage. For example, many of our properties are located in coastal regions and would, therefore, be affected by any future increases in sea levels or in the frequency or severity of hurricanes and tropical storms. In addition, some of our properties are located in California and other regions that are especially susceptible to earthquakes. 8 The occurrence of terrorist acts could sharply increase the premium paid for terrorism insurance coverage. Further, mortgage lenders, in some cases, insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial property owners as a condition for providing mortgage loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable costs, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot provide assurance that we will have adequate coverage for such losses and, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We may incur significant costs complying with the ADA and similar laws, which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Under the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe the properties in our portfolio substantially comply with the present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance, nor can we be assured that requirements will not change. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our properties and make alterations as appropriate in this respect. If one or more of the properties in our portfolio is not in compliance with the ADA, we would be required to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance, and it could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Additional federal, state and local laws may also require modifications to our properties, or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA and any other legislation, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. We may incur liability with respect to contaminated property or incur costs to comply with environmental laws, which may negatively impact our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or release of hazardous substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under or from such property, including costs for investigation, remediation, natural resource damages or third party liability for personal injury or property damage. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or release of such materials, and the liability may be joint and several. In addition, the presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may adversely affect our ability to sell, redevelop, or lease such property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Environmental laws may also create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which that property may be used or how businesses may be operated on that property. Some of our properties have been or may be impacted by contamination arising from current or prior uses of the property or adjacent properties for commercial or industrial purposes. Such contamination may arise from spills of petroleum or hazardous substances or releases from tanks used to store such materials. We may also be liable for the costs of remediating contamination at off-site disposal or treatment facilities when we arrange for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at such facilities. The environmental site assessments described in Item 1. “Business — Environmental Matters” have a limited scope and may not reveal all potential environmental liabilities. Further, material environmental conditions may have arisen after the review was completed or may arise in the future, and future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose additional material environmental liability beyond what was known at the time the site assessment was conducted. In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws, including laws governing the management of waste and underground and aboveground storage tanks. Noncompliance with these environmental, health and safety laws could subject us or our tenants to liability, which could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us. Moreover, changes in laws could increase the potential costs of compliance with environmental, health and safety laws or increase liability for noncompliance. This may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise materially and adversely affect our operations, or those of our tenants, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on us. As the owner or operator of real property, we may also incur liability based on various building conditions. For example, buildings and other structures on properties that we currently own or operate or those we acquire or operate in the future contain, may contain, or may have contained, asbestos-containing material, or ACM. Environmental, health and safety laws require that ACM be properly managed and maintained and may impose fines or penalties on owners, operators or employers for non-compliance with these requirements. These requirements include special precautions, such as removal, abatement or air monitoring, if ACM would be disturbed during maintenance, renovation or demolition of a building, potentially resulting in substantial costs. In addition, we may be subject to liability for personal injury or property damage sustained as a result of exposure to ACM or releases of ACM into the environment. 9 When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur if not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants or to increase ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from our tenants, employees of our tenants, or others if property damage or personal injury occurs. To the extent we incur costs or liabilities as a result of environmental issues, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We may experience a decline in the fair value of our assets, which could materially and adversely impact our results of operations. A decline in the fair value of our assets may require us to recognize an impairment charge on such assets under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) if we were to determine that we do not have the ability and intent to hold such assets for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery to the asset’s carrying value. If such a determination were to be made, we would recognize an impairment charge through earnings and write down the carrying value of such assets to a new cost basis based on the fair value of such assets on the date they are considered to not be recoverable. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized aggregate impairment charges related to investment properties of $19,937, $72,203 and $92,033, respectively (including $32,547 reflected in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013). We may be required to recognize additional asset impairment charges in the future. We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems. We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through (i) cyber attacks or cyber intrusions, (ii) malware, (iii) computer viruses, (iv) people with access or who gain access to our systems, and (v) other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could significantly disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and, as a result, disrupt our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Our success depends on key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed. We depend on the efforts and expertise of our senior management team to manage our day-to-day operations and strategic business direction. While we have retention and severance agreements with certain members of our executive management team that provide for certain payments in the event of a change of control or termination without cause, we do not have employment agreements with the members of our executive management team. Therefore, we cannot guarantee their continued service. The loss of their services, and our inability to find suitable replacements, could have an adverse effect on our operations. RISKS RELATED TO OUR DEBT FINANCING We are generally subject to the risks associated with debt financing and our debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial health and operating flexibility. Required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness reduce funds available for tenant improvements and leasing costs, as well as external growth initiatives and distributions to our shareholders. Our existing debt financing and debt service obligations also increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including increases in interest rates. In addition, as our existing debt comes due, we may be unable to refinance it or access additional capital on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. 10 Credit ratings may not reflect all the risks of an investment in our debt or preferred shares. Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencies of our ability to pay our debts and preferred dividends when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our publicly-traded debt or preferred shares. Credit ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency at its sole discretion. We do not undertake any obligation to maintain the ratings or advise holders of our debt or preferred shares of any change in our ratings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Adverse changes in our credit ratings could impact our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, and could significantly reduce the market prices of our publicly-traded debt or preferred shares. Our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by financial and other covenants and provisions under the unsecured credit agreement governing our unsecured revolving line of credit and unsecured term loan (the Unsecured Credit Agreement), or other debt agreements, including the Indenture, as supplemented, governing our 4.00% notes (the Indenture) and the note purchase agreement governing our Series A and Series B notes (the Note Purchase Agreement). The Unsecured Credit Agreement, the Indenture, the Note Purchase Agreement and any future debt agreements require, or may require, compliance with certain financial and operating covenants, including, among others, the requirement to maintain maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios, minimum interest, fixed charge, debt service and unencumbered interest coverage ratios, a minimum ratio of assets to unsecured debt and a minimum consolidated net worth. They also contain or may contain customary events of default, including defaults on any of our recourse indebtedness in excess of $50,000. The provisions of these agreements could limit our ability to obtain additional funds needed to address cash shortfalls or pursue growth opportunities or other accretive transactions. In addition, our senior unsecured debt obligations, including our Unsecured Credit Facility, 4.00% notes and our Series A and Series B notes, are pari passu in priority of payment. Therefore, a breach of these covenants or other events of default would allow the lenders to require us to accelerate payment of amounts outstanding under one or all of these agreements. If payment is accelerated, our liquid assets may not be sufficient to repay such debt in full and, as a result, such an event may have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we have a cross-collateralized pool of mortgages that is secured by IW JV 2009, LLC (IW JV), a previously consolidated joint venture that became wholly-owned in April 2012. This pool of mortgages is subject to a lockbox and cash management agreement pursuant to which substantially all of the income generated by the 48 properties, which secured the outstanding mortgages payable as of December 31, 2015, is deposited directly into a lockbox account established by the lender. In the event of a default or the debt service coverage ratio falling below a set amount, the cash management agreement provides that excess cash flow will be swept into a cash management account for the benefit of the lender and held as additional security after the payment of interest and approved property operating expenses. In the event of a default, cash will not be distributed to us from these accounts until the earlier of a cash sweep event cure or the repayment of the mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with the terms of the cash management agreement; however, if an event of default were to occur, we may be forced to borrow funds in order to make distributions to our shareholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT. Given the restrictions in our debt covenants on these and other activities, we may be limited in our operating and financial flexibility and in our ability to respond to changes in our business or to pursue strategic opportunities in the future. Increases in interest rates would cause our borrowing costs to rise and may limit our ability to refinance debt. Although a significant amount of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates, we also borrow funds at variable interest rates. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense on any outstanding unhedged variable rate debt and would affect the terms under which we refinance our existing debt as it matures, which would adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Defaults on secured indebtedness may result in foreclosure. In addition, mortgages sometimes include cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions that increase the risk that more than one property may be affected by a default. In the event that we default on mortgages in the future, either as a result of ceasing to make debt service payments or failing to meet applicable covenants, the lenders may accelerate our debt obligations and foreclose and/or take control of the properties that secure their loans. In the event of a default under any of our recourse indebtedness, we may also remain liable for any deficiency between the value of the property securing such loan and the principal and accrued interest on the loan. In addition, as a result of cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions contained in certain of our mortgage loans, a default under one mortgage loan 11 could result in a default on other indebtedness and cause us to lose other better performing properties, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Further, for tax purposes, the foreclosure of a mortgage may result in the recognition of taxable income related to the extinguished debt without us having received any accompanying cash proceeds. As a result, since we are structured as a REIT, we may be required to identify and utilize sources for distributions to our shareholders related to such taxable income in order to avoid incurring corporate tax or to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code. RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Our board of directors may change significant corporate policies without shareholder approval. Our investment, financing and distribution policies are determined by our board of directors. These policies may be amended or revised at any time at the discretion of the board of directors without a vote of our shareholders. As a result, the ability of our shareholders to control our policies and practices is extremely limited. We could make investments and engage in business activities that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments and businesses described in this report. In addition, our board of directors may change our policies with respect to conflicts of interest provided that such changes are consistent with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). A change in these policies could have an adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. We could increase the number of authorized shares of stock and issue stock without shareholder approval. Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, our charter authorizes our board of directors, without shareholder approval, to increase the aggregate number of authorized shares of stock or the number of authorized shares of stock of any class or series, to issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and to set the preferences, rights and other terms of such classified or unclassified shares. As a result, we may issue series or classes of common stock or preferred stock with preferences, dividends, powers and rights, voting or otherwise, that are senior to, or otherwise conflict with, the rights of holders of our common stock. The Company has also established an at-the-market equity program under which it may sell shares of its Class A common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 from time to time. In addition, our board of directors could establish a series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or that our shareholders may believe is in their best interests. Certain provisions of our charter may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of our company. Our charter provides that no person may beneficially own more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding common stock or 9.8% in value of the aggregate outstanding shares of our capital stock. While these charter provisions help us to ensure we maintain our REIT status, these ownership limitations may prevent an acquisition of control of our company by a third party without our board of directors’ approval, even if our shareholders believe the change of control is in their best interests. Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes of control, which could lower the values of our Class A common stock and Series A preferred stock. Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, may have the effect of inhibiting or deterring a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide our common stockholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price of such shares, including: • • “business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of our then outstanding voting shares) or an affiliate of an interested shareholder for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter, may impose special shareholder voting requirements unless certain minimum price conditions are satisfied; and “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of outstanding “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our 12 shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares. As permitted by the MGCL, our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting any business combinations between us and any other person or entity from the business combination provisions of the MGCL. Our bylaws provide that such resolution or any other resolution of our board of directors exempting any business combination from the business combination provisions of the MGCL may only be revoked, altered or amended, and our board of directors may only adopt a resolution that is inconsistent with any such prior resolution (including any amendment to that bylaw provision), which we refer to as an opt in to the business combination provisions, with the approval of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all votes cast by the holders of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. In addition, as permitted by the MGCL, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition provisions of the MGCL any acquisition by any person of shares of our stock. This bylaw provision may be amended, which we refer to as an opt in to the control share acquisition provisions, only with the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on such matter by holders of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits our board of directors, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses, including adopting a classified board. Such takeover defenses may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could provide our common shareholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price. In addition, the provisions of our charter on removal of directors and the advance notice provisions of our bylaws, among others, could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control of our company that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or that our shareholders may believe to be in their best interests. Likewise, if our company’s board of directors were to opt in to the provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL, or if our board of directors were to opt in to the business combination provisions or the control share acquisition provisions of the MGCL, with shareholder approval, these provisions could have similar anti-takeover effects. Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited, which could limit shareholder recourse in the event of actions that our shareholders do not believe are in their best interests. Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she satisfies his or her duties to us and our shareholders. As permitted by the MGCL, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and our shareholders for monetary damages, except for liability resulting from: • actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or • a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated. In addition, our charter and bylaws and indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors and certain of our officers require us to indemnify our directors and officers, among others, for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist. Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any of our directors or officers impede the performance of our company, your ability to recover damages from such director or officer will be limited. In addition, we will be obligated to advance the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers with indemnification agreements, and may, at the discretion of our board of directors, advance the defense costs incurred by our employees and other agents, in connection with legal proceedings. Our charter contains provisions that make removal of our directors difficult, which could make it difficult for our shareholders to effect changes to our management. Our charter provides that a director may only be removed for cause upon the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. Vacancies may be filled only by a majority vote of the remaining directors in office, even if less than a quorum. These requirements make it more difficult to change our management by removing and replacing directors and may prevent a change of control that is in the best interests of our shareholders. 13 RISKS RELATED TO OUR REIT STATUS Failure to qualify as a REIT would cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation and, even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities which could substantially reduce funds available for distribution to our shareholders and materially and adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that we have been organized, owned and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2003, and that our intended manner of ownership and operation will enable us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure you that we have qualified or will qualify as such. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code as to which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations and involves the determination of facts and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to annually distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for distributions to our shareholders because: • we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates; • we could be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax; • we could be subject to increased state and local taxes; and • unless we are entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, it could result in default under certain of our indebtedness agreements. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. We may be required to borrow funds or sell assets to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements. Our cash flows may be insufficient to fund distributions required to maintain our qualification as a REIT as a result of differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and the recognition of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible expenditures, such as capital expenditures, payments of compensation for which Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction, the creation of reserves or required amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis or sell assets, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings or sales, in order to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements. Such actions could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates. Certain qualified dividends paid by corporations to individuals, trusts and estates that are U.S. shareholders are taxed at capital gain rates, which are lower than ordinary income rates. Dividends of current and accumulated earnings and profits payable by REITs, however, are taxed at ordinary income rates as opposed to the capital gain rates. Dividends payable by REITs in excess of these earnings and profits generally are treated as a non-taxable reduction of the shareholders’ basis in the shares to the extent thereof and thereafter as taxable gain. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs, including us, to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stock of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which may negatively impact the trading prices of our Class A common stock and Series A preferred stock. Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments. To qualify as a REIT, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our shareholders and the ownership of our capital stock. In order to meet 14 these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make and refrain from engaging in certain activities. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our performance. In addition, if we fail to comply with certain asset ownership tests at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments. Shareholders may be restricted from acquiring or transferring certain amounts of our stock. In order to maintain our REIT qualification, among other requirements, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to include certain kinds of entities, during the last half of any taxable year, other than the first year for which we made a REIT election. To assist us in qualifying as a REIT, our charter contains an aggregate stock ownership limit of 9.8%, a common stock ownership limit of 9.8% and a preferred stock ownership limit of 9.8%. Generally, shareholders must include stock of affiliates for purposes of determining whether they own stock in excess of any of these ownership limits. If anyone attempts to transfer or own shares of our stock in a way that would violate the aggregate stock ownership limit, the common stock ownership limit or the preferred stock ownership limit, unless such ownership limits have been waived by our board of directors, or in a way that would prevent us from continuing to qualify as a REIT, those shares instead will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and will be either redeemed by us or sold to a person whose ownership of the shares will not violate the aggregate stock ownership limit, the common stock ownership limit or the preferred stock ownership limit. Purported transferees generally bear any decline in the market price of such stock held in such trust, but do not benefit from any increase. If this transfer to a trust fails to prevent such a violation or our disqualification as a REIT, then the initial intended transfer or ownership will be null and void from the outset. The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification without shareholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders. Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to be a REIT, we will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates and state and local taxes, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our shareholders. GENERAL INVESTMENT RISKS The market prices and trading volume of our debt and equity securities may be volatile. The market prices of our debt and equity securities depend on various factors which may be unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. We cannot assure you that the market prices of our debt and equity securities, including our Class A common stock, will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. A number of factors could negatively affect, or result in fluctuations in, the prices or trading volume of our debt and equity securities, including: • • • • • • actual or anticipated changes in our operating results and changes in expectations of future financial performance; our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies; our strategic decisions, such as acquisitions, dispositions, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy; adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we incur in the future; equity issuances or buybacks by us or the perception that such issuances or buybacks may occur; increases in market interest rates or decreases in our distributions to shareholders that lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield; • changes in market valuations of similar companies; 15 • • • • • • • • • • • changes in real estate valuations; additions or departures of key management personnel; changes in the real estate industry, including increased competition due to shopping center supply growth, and in the retail industry, including growth in e-commerce, catalog companies and direct consumer sales; publication of research reports about us or our industry by securities analysts; speculation in the press or investment community; the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us, our tax status, or our industry; changes in accounting principles; our failure to satisfy the listing requirements of the NYSE; our failure to comply with the requirements of the Act; our failure to qualify as a REIT; and general market conditions, including factors unrelated to our performance. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations. Increases in market interest rates may result in a decrease in the value of our publicly-traded debt and equity securities. One of the factors that may influence the prices of our publicly-traded debt and equity securities is the interest rate on our publicly- traded debt and the dividend yield on our common and preferred stock relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, rise, our borrowing costs could rise and result in less funds being available for distribution. We therefore may not be able to, or we may choose not to, provide a higher distribution rate on our common stock. In addition, fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of our properties. These factors could result in a decline in the market prices of our publicly-traded debt and equity securities. Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common and preferred stock, or equity securities, which would dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and may be senior to our existing common stock, may adversely affect the market prices of our common and preferred stock. We have issued one series of preferred stock, $500,000 of unsecured notes and have established an at-the-market (ATM) equity program under which we may sell shares of our Class A common stock. In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, including senior or subordinated notes and classes of preferred or common stock. Holders of debt securities or shares of preferred stock will generally be entitled to receive interest payments or distributions, both current and in connection with any liquidation or sale, prior to the holders of our common stock. Furthermore, offerings of common stock or other equity securities may dilute the holdings of our existing shareholders. We are not required to offer any such equity securities to existing shareholders on a preemptive basis, and future offerings of debt or equity securities, or perceptions that such offerings may occur, may reduce the market prices of our common and preferred stock or the distributions that we pay with respect to our common stock. Because we may generally issue any such debt or equity securities in the future without obtaining the consent of our shareholders, our shareholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market prices of our common and preferred stock and diluting their proportionate ownership. The change of control conversion feature of our Series A preferred stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over our company or discourage a party from taking over our company. Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in our Articles Supplementary for our Series A preferred stock), holders of our Series A preferred stock will have the right to convert some or all of their Series A preferred stock into shares of our common stock, or equivalent value of alternative consideration, unless we have provided notice of our election to redeem our Series A preferred stock. Upon such a conversion, the preferred holders will be limited to a maximum number of shares of our common stock equal to 4.1736, subject to certain adjustments, multiplied by the number of shares of Series A preferred stock converted. 16 The change of control conversion feature of our Series A preferred stock may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing certain change of control transactions of our company under circumstances that our shareholders may otherwise believe are in their best interests. Our ability to pay dividends is limited by the requirements of Maryland law. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock and Series A preferred stock is limited by the laws of the State of Maryland. Under applicable Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally may not make a distribution if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless the corporation’s charter provides otherwise, the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Accordingly, we generally may not make a distribution on our common stock or Series A preferred stock if, after giving effect to the distribution, we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business or our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus, unless the terms of such class or series provide otherwise, the amount that would be needed to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of the holders of shares of any class or series of preferred stock then outstanding, if any, with preferences senior to those of our common stock or Series A preferred stock, respectively. Changes in accounting standards may adversely impact our financial results. The Financial Accounting Standards Board, in conjunction with the SEC, has several key projects on its agenda that could impact how we currently account for material transactions, including lease accounting and other convergence projects with the International Accounting Standards Board. At this time, we are unable to predict with certainty which, if any, proposals may be passed or what level of impact any such proposal could have on the presentation of our consolidated financial statements, results of operations and financial ratios required by our debt covenants. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties The following table sets forth summary information regarding our consolidated operating portfolio as of December 31, 2015. Dollars (other than per square foot information) and square feet of GLA are presented in thousands. This information is grouped into divisions based on the manner in which we have structured our asset management, property management and leasing operations. For additional property details on our consolidated operating portfolio, see “Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III)” herein. Division Eastern Division Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia Western Division Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Washington Number of Properties ABR % of Total Retail ABR (a) ABR per Occupied Sq. Ft. % of Total Retail GLA (a) Occupancy (b) GLA 120 $ 238,269 53.8% $ 15.56 16,207 56.0% 94.5% 78 204,768 46.2% 17.19 12,723 44.0% 93.6% Total retail operating portfolio Office Total consolidated operating portfolio 198 1 443,037 10,476 199 $ 453,513 100.0% 16.27 11.71 16.12 $ 28,930 895 29,825 100.0% 94.1% 100.0% 94.3% (a) Percentages are only provided for our retail operating portfolio. (b) Calculated as the percentage of economically occupied GLA as of December 31, 2015. Including leases signed but not commenced, our retail operating portfolio and our consolidated operating portfolio were 94.9% and 95.1% leased, respectively, as of December 31, 2015. 17 The following table sets forth information regarding the 20 largest tenants in our retail operating portfolio based on ABR as of December 31, 2015. Dollars (other than per square foot information) and square feet of GLA are presented in thousands. Tenant Ahold U.S.A. Inc. Best Buy Co., Inc. Primary DBA Giant Foods, Stop & Shop, Martin's Best Buy, Pacific Sales The TJX Companies, Inc. HomeGoods, Marshalls, T.J. Maxx Ross Stores, Inc. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. Rite Aid Corporation PetSmart, Inc. The Home Depot, Inc. AB Acquisition LLC Bed Bath & Beyond, Buy Buy Baby, The Christmas Tree Shops, Cost Plus World Market Safeway, Jewel-Osco, Shaw’s Supermarket, Tom Thumb Regal Entertainment Group Edwards Cinema Michaels Stores, Inc. Michaels, Aaron Brothers Art & Frame The Sports Authority, Inc. Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Office Depot, Inc. Ascena Retail Group Inc. Publix Super Markets Inc. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. The Gap, Inc. The Kroger Co. Barnes & Noble, Inc. Total Top Retail Tenants Office Depot, OfficeMax Dress Barn, Lane Bryant, Justice, Catherine’s, Ann Taylor, Maurices, LOFT Dick's Sporting Goods, Golf Galaxy, Field & Stream Old Navy, Banana Republic, The Gap, Gap Factory Store Kroger, Harris Teeter, King Soopers, QFC Number of Stores ABR % of Total ABR ABR per Occupied Sq. Ft. Occupied GLA % of Occupied GLA $ 13,275 3.0% $ 12,697 10,833 10,583 9,492 9,388 8,398 7,303 7,117 6,911 6,167 5,785 5,564 5,551 5,416 5,405 5,403 5,065 4,978 4,686 2.9% 2.4% 2.4% 2.1% 2.1% 1.9% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% $ 150,017 33.9% $ 19.67 15.24 9.17 11.22 13.72 22.95 14.63 8.39 13.53 31.56 11.38 13.18 20.09 14.16 20.91 10.58 10.92 14.72 9.84 16.74 13.68 675 833 1,181 943 692 409 574 870 526 219 542 439 277 392 259 511 495 344 506 280 10,967 2.5% 3.1% 4.3% 3.5% 2.5% 1.5% 2.1% 3.2% 1.9% 0.8% 2.0% 1.6% 1.0% 1.4% 1.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.3% 1.9% 1.0% 40.3% 11 21 40 32 26 32 28 8 10 2 24 10 27 19 48 12 10 25 9 11 405 18 The following table sets forth a summary, as of December 31, 2015, of lease expirations scheduled to occur during 2016 and each of the nine calendar years from 2017 to 2025 and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights for all leases in our retail operating portfolio. The following table is based on leases commenced as of December 31, 2015. Dollars (other than per square foot information) and square feet of GLA are presented in thousands. Lease Expiration Year Lease Count ABR % of Total ABR ABR per Occupied Sq. Ft. GLA % of Occupied GLA 2016 (a) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Thereafter Month-to-month Total 381 435 487 520 390 211 104 98 155 112 88 49 3,030 $ $ 31,187 43,390 55,073 73,472 51,572 36,748 28,675 24,583 32,807 24,468 39,201 1,861 443,037 7.0% $ 9.8% 12.4% 16.5% 11.7% 8.2% 6.6% 5.6% 7.4% 5.5% 8.9% 0.4% 100.0% $ 19.26 15.27 18.08 17.99 15.45 15.99 13.91 15.19 14.88 16.25 15.76 16.47 16.27 1,619 2,842 3,046 4,084 3,339 2,298 2,062 1,618 2,205 1,506 2,488 113 27,220 6.0% 10.4% 11.2% 15.0% 12.3% 8.4% 7.6% 6.0% 8.1% 5.5% 9.1% 0.4% 100.0% (a) Excludes month-to-month leases. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining term of the lease at our office property was 11 months. Item 3. Legal Proceedings We are subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 19 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information The following table sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our Class A common stock, which trades on the NYSE under the trading symbol “RPAI”, and the quarterly dividend distributions per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014: 2015 Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter 2014 Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter Sales Price High Low Dividends per Share $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 15.60 15.39 16.18 18.24 16.99 16.15 15.65 14.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 13.79 13.10 13.83 15.42 14.43 13.48 13.42 12.07 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 0.165625 The closing share price for our Class A common stock on February 12, 2016, as reported on the NYSE, was $14.66. We have determined that the dividends paid during 2015 and 2014 on our Class A common stock qualify for the following tax treatment: Ordinary dividends Non-dividend distributions Total distribution per common share 2015 0.499116 0.163384 0.662500 $ $ 2014 0.447492 0.215008 0.662500 $ $ As of February 12, 2016, there were approximately 16,400 record holders of our Class A common stock. The number of holders does not include individuals or entities who beneficially own shares but whose shares are held of record by a broker or clearing agency. We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Code generally requires that a REIT annually distributes to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. The Code imposes tax on any taxable income, including net capital gains, retained by a REIT. To satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income and excise tax, we intend to make regular quarterly distributions of all, or substantially all, of our REIT taxable income to shareholders. Our future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. When determining the amount of future distributions, we expect that our board of directors will consider, among other factors, (i) the amount of cash generated from our operating activities, (ii) our expectations of future cash flow, (iii) our determination of near-term cash needs for debt repayments, acquisitions of new properties, redevelopment opportunities and existing or future share repurchases, (iv) the timing of significant re-leasing activities and the establishment of additional cash reserves for anticipated tenant allowances and general property capital improvements, (v) our ability to continue to access additional sources of capital, (vi) the amount required to be distributed to maintain our status as a REIT and to reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay, and (vii) the amount required to declare and pay in cash, or set aside for the payment of, the dividends on our Series A preferred stock for all past dividend periods. As of December 31, 2015, our unsecured revolving line of credit and our unsecured term loan (collectively, the Unsecured Credit Facility) limited our distributions to the greater of 95% of funds from operations (FFO), as defined in the unsecured credit agreement (which equals FFO attributable to common shareholders, as set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Shareholders,” excluding gains or losses from extraordinary items, impairment charges not already excluded from FFO attributable to common shareholders and other non- cash charges) or the amount necessary for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered 20 into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement, which does not include a similar limitation on our distributions though it does require us to distribute at least an amount necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT. If our operations do not generate sufficient cash flow to allow us to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, we may be required to fund distributions from working capital or by borrowing funds, issuing equity or selling assets. Our actual results of operations will be affected by a number of factors, including the revenues we receive from tenants at our properties, our operating and corporate expenses, interest expense, the ability of our tenants to meet their obligations and unanticipated expenditures. For more information regarding risk factors that could materially adversely affect our actual results of operations, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2015. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The following table summarizes the amount of shares of Class A common stock surrendered to the Company by employees to satisfy such employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common stock for the specified periods: Period October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2015 November 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015 December 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 Total Total number of shares of Class A common stock purchased Average price paid per share of Class A common stock 20 $ — $ — $ 20 $ 14.16 — — 14.16 Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (a) N/A N/A N/A N/A $ $ N/A N/A 250,000 250,000 (a) As disclosed on the Form 8-K dated December 15, 2015, represents amount outstanding under our $250,000 common stock repurchase program. There is no scheduled expiration date to this program. As of December 31, 2015, we had not repurchased any shares under this program. 21 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report. “Total assets” and “Total debt” in the table below reflect the early adoption of the accounting pronouncement related to the presentation of debt issuance costs. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further details. The adoption of this pronouncement resulted in the reclassification of $15,730, $19,046, $24,883 and $27,984 of unamortized capitalized loan fees from “Total assets” to “Total debt” as of December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, $141 and $12 of unamortized capitalized loan fees associated with properties held for sale were reclassified from “Total assets” to “Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net” as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) Net investment properties Total assets Total debt Total shareholders’ equity Total revenues Expenses: Depreciation and amortization Other Total expenses Operating income Gain on extinguishment of debt Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net Gain on sale of joint venture interest Gain on change in control of investment properties Interest expense Other non-operating income (expense), net Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net Gain on sales of investment properties, net Net income (loss) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net income (loss) attributable to the Company Preferred stock dividends Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders Earnings (loss) per common share – basic and diluted: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders Distributions declared – preferred Distributions declared per preferred share Distributions declared – common Distributions declared per common share Cash flows provided by operating activities Cash flows provided by investing activities Cash flows used in financing activities Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted 2014 4,314,905 4,787,989 2,318,735 2,187,881 600,614 215,966 282,003 497,969 102,645 — 4,258 (2,088) — 24,158 (133,835) 5,459 597 507 42,196 43,300 — 43,300 (9,450) 33,850 0.14 — 0.14 9,450 1.75 156,742 0.66 254,014 77,900 (277,812) 236,184 236,187 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2013 4,474,044 4,858,518 2,280,587 2,307,340 551,508 222,710 251,277 473,987 77,521 — — (1,246) 17,499 5,435 (146,805) 4,741 (42,855) 50,675 5,806 13,626 — 13,626 (9,450) 4,176 (0.20) 0.22 0.02 9,713 1.80 155,616 0.66 239,632 103,212 (422,723) 234,134 234,134 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2015 4,254,647 4,621,251 2,166,238 2,155,337 603,960 214,706 248,184 462,890 141,070 — — — — — (138,938) 1,700 3,832 — 121,792 125,624 (528) 125,096 (9,450) 115,646 0.49 — 0.49 9,450 1.75 157,173 0.66 265,813 25,288 (351,969) 236,380 236,382 22 2012 4,687,091 5,212,544 2,567,206 2,374,259 531,171 208,658 187,949 396,607 134,564 3,879 — (6,307) — — (171,295) 24,791 (14,368) 6,078 7,843 (447) — (447) (263) (710) (0.03) 0.03 $ $ 2011 5,260,788 5,913,910 3,453,234 2,135,024 531,077 $ $ $ $ $ 213,623 192,282 405,905 125,172 15,345 — (6,437) — — (203,914) (1,658) (71,492) (6,992) 5,906 (72,578) (31) (72,609) — (72,609) (0.34) (0.04) — $ (0.38) — $ — $ $ $ $ $ $ 146,769 0.66 167,085 471,829 (636,854) 220,464 220,464 — — 120,647 0.63 174,607 107,471 (276,282) 192,456 192,456 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Certain statements in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors,” “Business” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “continues” or “anticipates” and variations of such words or similar expressions or the negative of such words. You can also identify forward- looking statements by discussions of strategies, plans or intentions. Risks, uncertainties and changes in the following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward- looking statements: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • economic, business and financial conditions, and changes in our industry and changes in the real estate markets in particular; economic and other developments in the state of Texas, where we have a high concentration of properties; our business strategy; our projected operating results; rental rates and/or vacancy rates; frequency and magnitude of defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by tenants; bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a significant number of smaller tenants; interest rates or operating costs; real estate and zoning laws and changes in real property tax rates; real estate valuations, potentially resulting in impairment charges; our leverage; our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness; our ability to obtain necessary outside financing; the availability, terms and deployment of capital; general volatility of the capital and credit markets and the market price of our Class A common stock; risks generally associated with real estate acquisitions, dispositions and redevelopment, including the impact of construction delays and cost overruns; our ability to effectively manage growth; composition of members of our senior management team; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; our ability to make distributions to our shareholders; our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT; governmental regulations, tax laws and rates and similar matters; our compliance with laws, rules and regulations; 23 • • • environmental uncertainties and exposure to natural disasters; insurance coverage; and the likelihood or actual occurrence of terrorist attacks in the U.S. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance or transactions, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which are based only on information currently available to us (or to third parties making the forward-looking statements). We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by applicable law. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report. Executive Summary Retail Properties of America, Inc. is a REIT and is one of the largest owners and operators of high quality, strategically located shopping centers in the United States. As of December 31, 2015, we owned 198 retail operating properties representing 28,930,000 square feet of GLA. Our retail operating portfolio includes (i) power centers, (ii) neighborhood and community centers, and (iii) lifestyle centers and multi-tenant retail-focused mixed-use properties, as well as single-user retail properties. The following table summarizes our operating portfolio as of December 31, 2015: Property Type Operating portfolio: Multi-tenant retail Power centers Neighborhood and community centers Lifestyle centers and mixed-use properties Total multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Total retail operating portfolio Office Total operating portfolio (a) Includes leases signed but not commenced. Number of Properties GLA (in thousands) Occupancy Percent Leased Including Leases Signed (a) 52 85 14 151 47 198 1 199 11,973 10,527 5,214 27,714 1,216 28,930 895 29,825 96.1% 92.9% 90.5% 93.8% 100.0% 94.1% 100.0% 94.3% 97.0% 93.9% 90.8% 94.7% 100.0% 94.9% 100.0% 95.1% In addition to our operating portfolio, we owned one development property that was not under active development as of December 31, 2015. 24 2015 Company Highlights Acquisitions During the year ended December 31, 2015, we continued to execute our investment strategy by acquiring eight multi-tenant retail operating properties and three parcels at existing wholly-owned multi-tenant retail operating properties for a total purchase price of $463,136. The following table summarizes our 2015 acquisitions: Date Property Name January 8, 2015 Downtown Crown January 23, 2015 Merrifield Town Center January 23, 2015 Fort Evans Plaza II February 19, 2015 Cedar Park Town Center March 24, 2015 Lake Worth Towne Crossing – Parcel (a) May 4, 2015 June 10, 2015 July 31, 2015 Tysons Corner Woodinville Plaza Southlake Town Square – Outparcel (b) August 27, 2015 Coal Creek Marketplace October 27, 2015 Royal Oaks Village II – Outparcel (a) November 13, 2015 Towson Square Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Austin Dallas Washington, D.C. Seattle Dallas Seattle Houston Baltimore Property Type Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Land Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user outparcel Multi-tenant retail Single-user outparcel Multi-tenant retail Square Footage Acquisition Price 258,000 $ 162,785 84,900 228,900 179,300 — 37,700 170,800 13,800 55,900 12,300 138,200 56,500 65,000 39,057 400 31,556 35,250 8,440 17,600 6,841 39,707 1,179,800 $ 463,136 (a) We acquired a parcel located at our Lake Worth Towne Crossing multi-tenant retail operating property and a single-user outparcel located at our Royal Oaks Village II multi-tenant retail operating property. (b) We acquired a single-user outparcel located at our Southlake Town Square multi-tenant retail operating property that was subject to a ground lease with us (as lessor) prior to the transaction. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we acquired two multi-tenant retail assets aggregating 251,200 square feet for a total purchase price of $72,231. In total for 2016, we expect to acquire approximately $375,000 to $475,000 of strategic acquisitions in our target markets. Dispositions During the year ended December 31, 2015, we continued to pursue targeted dispositions of select non-target and single-user properties. Consideration from dispositions totaled $516,444 and included the sale of 16 multi-tenant retail operating properties, five single-user office properties, three single-user retail properties and two development properties, one of which had been held in a consolidated joint venture. 25 The following table summarizes our 2015 dispositions: Date Property Name January 20, 2015 Aon Hewitt East Campus February 27, 2015 Promenade at Red Cliff April 7, 2015 April 30, 2015 May 15, 2015 June 4, 2015 June 5, 2015 June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015 July 17, 2015 July 28, 2015 July 30, 2015 August 6, 2015 August 24, 2015 August 31, 2015 Hartford Insurance Building Rasmussen College Mountain View Plaza Massillon Commons Citizen's Property Insurance Building Pine Ridge Plaza Bison Hollow The Village at Quail Springs Greensburg Commons Arvada Connection and Arvada Marketplace Traveler's Office Building Shaw's Supermarket Harvest Towne Center Trenton Crossing & McAllen Shopping Center (a) September 15, 2015 The Shops at Boardwalk September 29, 2015 Best on the Boulevard September 29, 2015 Montecito Crossing October 29, 2015 Green Valley Crossing (b) November 12, 2015 Lake Mead Crossing December 2, 2015 December 9, 2015 Golfsmith Wal-Mart – Turlock December 18, 2015 Southgate Plaza December 31, 2015 Bellevue Mall Property Type Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Development Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Development Square Footage Consideration 343,000 $ 94,500 97,400 26,700 162,000 245,900 59,800 236,500 134,800 100,400 272,500 367,500 50,800 65,700 39,700 265,900 122,400 204,400 179,700 96,400 219,900 14,900 61,000 86,100 369,300 3,917,200 $ 17,233 19,050 6,015 4,800 28,500 12,520 3,650 33,200 18,800 11,350 18,400 54,900 4,841 3,000 7,800 39,295 27,400 42,500 52,200 35,000 42,565 4,475 6,200 7,000 15,750 516,444 (a) The terms of the disposition of Trenton Crossing and McAllen Shopping Center were negotiated as a single transaction. (b) The development property had been held in a consolidated joint venture and was sold to an affiliate of the joint venture partner. Concurrent with the sale, the joint venture was dissolved. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we sold two multi-tenant retail operating properties aggregating 765,800 square feet for total consideration of $92,500, including The Gateway which was disposed of through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of our mortgage obligation. During 2016, we expect targeted dispositions to be approximately $525,000 to $625,000. 26 Market Summary As a result of our capital recycling efforts over the past several years, we increased the amount of ABR in our target markets to more than 60% of our total multi-tenant retail ABR. The following table summarizes our operating portfolio by market as of December 31, 2015: Property Type/Market Multi-Tenant Retail: Target Markets Dallas, Texas Washington, D.C. / Baltimore, Maryland New York, New York Atlanta, Georgia Seattle, Washington Chicago, Illinois Houston, Texas San Antonio, Texas Phoenix, Arizona Austin, Texas Subtotal Non-Target – Top 50 MSAs Subtotal Target Markets and Top 50 MSAs Non-Target – Other Total Multi-Tenant Retail Single-User Retail Total Retail Office Number of Properties ABR % of Total Multi-Tenant Retail ABR ABR per Occupied Sq. Ft. % of Total Multi-Tenant Retail GLA GLA Occupancy % Leased Including Signed 19 $ 77,424 18.5% $ 20.85 4,006 52,860 33,319 19,006 15,864 14,899 14,856 12,420 10,251 5,366 256,265 69,566 12.6% 8.0% 4.5% 3.8% 3.6% 3.6% 3.0% 2.3% 1.3% 61.2% 16.6% 18.65 24.39 12.94 14.14 18.10 13.61 16.35 16.64 15.97 18.13 14.59 3,111 1,404 1,513 1,238 893 1,141 779 632 350 15,067 5,292 14.4% 11.2% 5.1% 5.5% 4.5% 3.2% 4.1% 2.8% 2.3% 1.3% 54.4% 92.7% 94.4% 91.1% 97.3% 97.1% 90.6% 92.2% 95.7% 97.5% 97.5% 96.0% 93.8% 91.8% 97.8% 97.1% 91.4% 95.1% 96.8% 97.5% 97.7% 96.5% 94.8% 19.1% 90.1% 91.3% 325,831 77.8% 17.25 20,359 73.5% 92.8% 93.9% 92,637 22.2% 418,468 100.0% 24,569 443,037 10,476 13.04 16.10 20.20 16.27 11.71 7,355 26.5% 96.6% 96.9% 27,714 100.0% 93.8% 94.7% 1,216 28,930 895 100.0% 100.0% 94.1% 94.9% 100.0% 100.0% 13 8 9 7 5 9 4 3 4 81 32 113 38 151 47 198 1 Total Operating Portfolio 199 $ 453,513 $ 16.12 29,825 94.3% 95.1% Leasing Activity The following table summarizes the leasing activity in our retail operating portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2015. Leases with terms of less than 12 months have been excluded from the table. Number of Leases Signed GLA Signed (in thousands) New Contractual Rent per Square Foot (PSF) (a) Prior Contractual Rent PSF (a) % Change over Prior ABR (a) Weighted Average Lease Term Tenant Allowances PSF Comparable Renewal Leases Comparable New Leases Non-Comparable New and Renewal Leases (b) Total 325 59 137 521 1,750 $ 285 695 2,730 $ 18.77 20.96 19.38 19.07 $ $ 17.63 17.01 n/a 17.54 6.47% 23.22% n/a 8.72% 4.70 8.44 8.21 6.03 $ $ 1.41 32.23 30.83 12.12 (a) Total excludes the impact of Non-Comparable New and Renewal Leases. (b) Includes leases signed on units that were vacant for over 12 months, leases signed without fixed rental payments and leases signed where the previous and the current lease do not have a consistent lease structure. We expect modest increases in occupancy in 2016, with the majority of expected leasing activity attributable to small shop tenants. In addition, as portfolio occupancy increases and available inventory of vacant space decreases, we expect our leasing volume to decline as we focus on the merchandising of our properties to ensure the right mix of operators and unique retailers. We continue to anticipate that a large proportion of our new leasing activity will be non-comparable in nature as the leased space is more likely to have been vacant for longer than 12 months. 27 Capital Markets On March 12, 2015, we completed a public offering of $250,000 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% senior unsecured notes due 2025 (4.00% notes). The 4.00% notes were priced at 99.526% of the principal amount to yield 4.058% to maturity and will mature on March 15, 2025, unless earlier redeemed. The proceeds were used to repay a portion of our unsecured revolving line of credit. On December 21, 2015, we established a new ATM equity program under which we may issue and sell shares of our Class A common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000, from time to time. Actual sales may depend on a variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions and the trading price of our Class A common stock. Any net proceeds are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include the funding of acquisitions and redevelopment activities and the repayment of debt, including our Unsecured Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had Class A common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 remaining available for sale under our ATM equity program. On December 15, 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase, from time to time, up to a maximum of $250,000 of shares of our Class A common stock. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price in absolute terms and in relation to the value of our assets, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. The common stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. As of December 31, 2015, we had not repurchased any shares under this program. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2015, we continued to enhance balance sheet flexibility by repaying or defeasing mortgage debt, including certain longer dated maturities, in amounts totaling $495,456 (excluding scheduled principal payments of $16,126 related to amortizing loans). We also borrowed $100,000, net of repayments, on our unsecured revolving line of credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by KeyBank National Association serving as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serving as syndication agent to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. Our 2016 unsecured credit facility consists of a $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit, a $200,000 unsecured term loan and a $250,000 unsecured term loan (collectively, our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility) and will be priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. The following table summarizes the key terms of our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility: 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility $200,000 unsecured term loan $250,000 unsecured term loan $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit 1/5/2021 1/5/2020 Maturity Date Extension Option Extension Fee Credit Spread Unused Fee Credit Spread Facility Fee Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing 5/11/2018 2 one year 0.15% 1.45% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.30% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.05% - 2.05% 0.90% - 1.75% N/A N/A 2 six month 0.075% 1.35% - 2.25% 0.15% - 0.25% 0.85% - 1.55% 0.125% - 0.30% Our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility has a $400,000 accordion option that allows us, at our election, to increase the total credit facility up to $1,600,000, subject to (i) customary fees and conditions including, but not limited to, the absence of an event of default as defined in the agreement and (ii) our ability to obtain additional lender commitments. Distributions We declared quarterly distributions totaling $1.75 per share of preferred stock and quarterly distributions totaling $0.6625 per share of common stock during 2015. Results of Operations We believe that net operating income (NOI) is a useful measure of our operating performance. We define NOI as operating revenues (rental income, tenant recovery income and other property income, excluding straight-line rental income, amortization of lease inducements, amortization of acquired above and below market lease intangibles and lease termination fee income) less property operating expenses (real estate tax expense and property operating expense, excluding straight-line ground rent expense, amortization of acquired ground lease intangibles and straight-line bad debt expense). Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating NOI, and accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to other REITs. This measure provides an operating perspective not immediately apparent from operating income or net income attributable to common shareholders as defined within GAAP. We use NOI to evaluate our performance on a property-by-property basis because NOI allows us to evaluate the impact that factors such as lease structure, lease rates and tenant base have on our operating results. 28 However, NOI should only be used as an alternative measure of our financial performance. For reference and as an aid in understanding our computation of NOI, a reconciliation of NOI to net income attributable to common shareholders as computed in accordance with GAAP has been presented. We include a reconciliation for each comparable period presented. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 The following table presents NOI for our same store portfolio and “Other investment properties” along with a reconciliation to net income attributable to common shareholders. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our same store portfolio consisted of 180 operating properties acquired or placed in service and stabilized prior to January 1, 2014. The number of properties in our same store portfolio decreased to 180 as of December 31, 2015 from 197 as of December 31, 2014 as a result of the following: • • • the removal of 22 same store investment properties sold during the year ended December 31, 2015; the removal of one investment property that was impaired below its debt balance during 2014; and the removal of one investment property where we have begun activities in anticipation of a redevelopment, which we expected to have a significant impact to property NOI during 2015, partially offset by • the addition of seven investment properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2013. The sales of Aon Hewitt East Campus on January 20, 2015 and Promenade at Red Cliff on February 27, 2015 did not impact the number of same store properties as they were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. In addition, the sales of Green Valley Crossing on October 29, 2015 and Bellevue Mall on December 31, 2015 did not impact the number of same store properties as they were both development properties and consequently did not meet the criteria to be included in our same store portfolio. The properties and financial results reported in “Other investment properties” primarily include the following: • • • • • • properties acquired during 2014 and 2015; our development property; two properties where we have begun activities in anticipation of future redevelopment; one property that was impaired below its debt balance during 2014; properties that were sold or held for sale in 2014 and 2015 that did not qualify for discontinued operations treatment; and the historical ground rent expense related to an existing same store investment property that was subject to a ground lease with a third party prior to our acquisition of the fee interest during the first quarter of 2014. In addition, the financial results reported in “Other investment properties” for the year ended December 31, 2015 include the net income from our wholly-owned captive insurance company, which was formed on December 1, 2014, and the financial results reported in “Other investment properties” for the year ended December 31, 2014 include the historical intercompany expense elimination related to our former insurance captive unconsolidated joint venture investment, in which we terminated our participation effective December 1, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the historical captive insurance expense related to our portfolio was recorded in equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net. 29 Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Change Percentage 1.9 1.6 16.6 4.0 (3.9) 2.9 (0.0) Operating revenues: Same store investment properties (180 properties): Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Other investment properties: Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Operating expenses: Same store investment properties (180 properties): Property operating expenses Real estate taxes Other investment properties: Property operating expenses Real estate taxes NOI from continuing operations: Same store investment properties Other investment properties Total NOI from continuing operations Other income (expense): Straight-line rental income, net Amortization of acquired above and below market lease intangibles, net Amortization of lease inducements Lease termination fees Straight-line ground rent expense Amortization of acquired ground lease intangibles Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties General and administrative expenses Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net Gain on change in control of investment properties Interest expense Other income, net Total other expense Income from continuing operations Discontinued operations: Loss, net Gain on sales of investment properties Income from discontinued operations Gain on sales of investment properties Net income Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest Net income attributable to the Company Preferred stock dividends Net income attributable to common shareholders $ $ 385,502 95,574 4,051 80,570 23,962 4,272 (71,804) (66,823) (19,814) (15,987) 346,500 73,003 419,503 3,498 3,621 (847) 3,757 (3,722) 560 (214,706) (19,937) (50,657) — — — (138,938) 1,700 (415,671) $ 378,201 94,054 3,475 90,333 21,665 4,069 (74,763) (64,333) (18,706) (14,440) 336,634 82,921 419,555 4,781 2,076 (707) 2,667 (3,889) 560 (215,966) (72,203) (34,229) 4,258 (2,088) 24,158 (133,835) 5,459 (418,958) 7,301 1,520 576 (9,763) 2,297 203 2,959 (2,490) (1,108) (1,547) 9,866 (9,918) (52) (1,283) 1,545 (140) 1,090 167 — 1,260 52,266 (16,428) (4,258) 2,088 (24,158) (5,103) (3,759) 3,287 3,832 597 3,235 — — — 121,792 125,624 (528) 125,096 (9,450) 115,646 $ $ (148) 655 507 42,196 43,300 — 43,300 (9,450) 33,850 $ 148 (655) (507) 79,596 82,324 (528) 81,796 — 81,796 Same store net operating income increased $9,866, or 2.9%, primarily due to the following: • • rental income increased $7,301 primarily due to increases of $3,385 from contractual rent changes, $2,280 from re-leasing spreads and a net increase of $2,168 as a result of an increase in our small shop occupancy and a decrease in our anchor occupancy, partially offset by a decrease of $373 from rent abatements; and total operating expenses, net of tenant recovery income, decreased $1,989 primarily as a result of a decrease in certain non-recoverable property operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in real estate taxes, bad debt expense and certain recoverable property operating expenses. 30 In 2016, we expect same store net operating income growth of 2.5% to 3.5%. Total NOI decreased $52, or (0.0)%, due to a decrease in NOI related to the properties sold in 2014 and 2015, partially offset by an increase in NOI related to the properties acquired during 2014 and 2015 and the increase of $9,866 from the same store portfolio described above. Other income (expense). This category decreased $3,287, or 0.8%, primarily due to: • • • a $52,266 decrease in provision for impairment of investment properties. Based on the results of our evaluations for impairment (see Notes 15 and 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), we recognized impairment charges of $19,937 and $72,203 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively; partially offset by a $24,158 gain on change in control of investment properties recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 associated with the dissolution of our MS Inland Fund, LLC (MS Inland) unconsolidated joint venture (see Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). No such gain was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015; a $16,428 increase in general and administrative expenses primarily consisting of an increase in compensation expense, including bonuses and amortization of unvested restricted shares and performance restricted stock units, of $13,140 and executive and realignment separation charges of $4,730; • a $5,103 increase in interest expense primarily consisting of: • • a $13,551 increase in interest on our unsecured notes payable, which were issued in June 2014 and March 2015; and an $8,162 increase in prepayment penalties and defeasance premiums; partially offset by • a $16,619 decrease in interest on mortgages payable due to the repayment of mortgage debt. • a $4,258 gain on extinguishment of other liabilities recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 related to the acquisition of the fee interest in one of our existing investment properties that was previously subject to a ground lease with a third party. The amount recognized represents the reversal of a straight-line ground rent liability associated with the ground lease. During 2016, we expect general and administrative expenses to moderate as we do not expect to incur executive and realignment separation charges in 2016. Discontinued operations. We elected to early adopt the revised discontinued operations pronouncement effective January 1, 2014. No discontinued operations were reported for the year ended December 31, 2015. Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 consists of one property, Riverpark Phase IIA, which was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, and therefore qualified for discontinued operations treatment under the previous standard, and was sold on March 11, 2014. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2014 to 2013 The following table presents NOI for the properties that were included in our same store portfolio for the periods presented, which consisted of 197 operating properties acquired or placed in service prior to January 1, 2013, and “Other investment properties,” along with a reconciliation to net income attributable to common shareholders. 31 Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 Change Percentage 2.3 5.3 (0.1) (1.1) (2.5) 3.3 8.8 Operating revenues: Same store investment properties (197 properties): Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Other investment properties: Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Operating expenses: Same store investment properties (197 properties): Property operating expenses Real estate taxes Other investment properties: Property operating expenses Real estate taxes NOI from continuing operations: Same store investment properties Other investment properties Total NOI from continuing operations Other income (expense): Straight-line rental income, net Amortization of acquired above and below market lease intangibles, net Amortization of lease inducements Lease termination fees Straight-line ground rent expense Amortization of acquired ground lease intangibles Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties General and administrative expenses Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net Gain on sale of joint venture interest Gain on change in control of investment properties Interest expense Other income, net Total other expense Income (loss) from continuing operations Discontinued operations: (Loss) income, net Gain on sales of investment properties Income from discontinued operations Gain on sales of investment properties Net income Net income attributable to the Company Preferred stock dividends Net income attributable to common shareholders $ $ $ 395,800 96,130 6,749 72,734 19,589 795 (77,114) (65,339) (16,355) (13,434) 356,226 63,329 419,555 4,781 2,076 (707) 2,667 (3,889) 560 (215,966) (72,203) (34,229) 4,258 (2,088) — 24,158 (133,835) 5,459 (418,958) 386,962 91,295 6,759 46,287 10,667 286 (76,287) (63,758) (9,082) (7,433) 344,971 40,725 385,696 (381) 976 (253) 8,605 (3,486) 93 (222,710) (59,486) (31,533) — (1,246) 17,499 5,435 (146,805) 4,741 (428,551) 8,838 4,835 (10) 26,447 8,922 509 (827) (1,581) (7,273) (6,001) 11,255 22,604 33,859 5,162 1,100 (454) (5,938) (403) 467 6,744 (12,717) (2,696) 4,258 (842) (17,499) 18,723 12,970 718 9,593 597 (42,855) 43,452 (148) 655 507 42,196 43,300 43,300 (9,450) 33,850 $ 9,396 41,279 50,675 5,806 13,626 13,626 (9,450) 4,176 $ (9,544) (40,624) (50,168) 36,390 29,674 29,674 — 29,674 $ Same store net operating income increased $11,255, or 3.3%, primarily due to the following: • • rental income increased $8,838 primarily due to an increase of $5,364 from occupancy growth and $3,691 from contractual rent increases and re-leasing spreads, partially offset by negotiated rent reductions and co-tenancy provisions in certain leases; and total operating expenses, net of tenant recovery income, decreased $2,427 primarily as a result of a decrease in certain non-recoverable operating expenses, including bad debt expense. 32 Total NOI increased $33,859, or 8.8%, primarily due to an increase of $28,937 in NOI related to the properties acquired during 2013 and 2014 and the increase of $11,255 from the same store portfolio described above, partially offset by a decrease of $7,459 in NOI related to the properties sold in 2014. Other (expense) income. This category decreased $9,593, or 2.2%, primarily due to: • an $18,723 increase in gain on change in control of investment properties associated with the dissolutions of our MS Inland and RC Inland L.P. (RioCan) unconsolidated joint ventures during 2014 and 2013, respectively (see Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements); • a $12,970 decrease in interest expense primarily consisting of: • • • an $11,722 decrease in interest on mortgages payable due to the repayment of mortgage debt; a $2,432 decrease in write-offs of loan fees primarily due to the 2013 repayment of the IW JV senior and junior mezzanine notes payable and a $1,422 decrease in interest on notes payable as a result of this repayment; and a $1,851 increase in the amortization of mortgage premium resulting from the assumption of mortgages payable in connection with the dissolutions of our MS Inland and RioCan unconsolidated joint ventures during 2014 and 2013, respectively; partially offset by • a $5,495 increase in interest expense due to the issuance of $250,000 of unsecured notes in a private placement transaction. a $6,744 decrease in depreciation and amortization primarily due to the write-off of assets demolished as part of redevelopment efforts at two operating properties during 2013 and the impact of 2014 dispositions, partially offset by the incremental increase due to the acquisition of properties in 2013 and 2014; partially offset by a $17,499 decrease in gain on sale of joint venture interest associated with the dissolution of our RioCan unconsolidated joint venture during 2013 (see Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements); and a $12,717 increase in provision for impairment of investment properties. Based on the results of our evaluations for impairment (see Notes 15 and 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), we recognized impairment charges of $72,203 and $59,486 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. • • • Discontinued operations. We elected to early adopt the revised discontinued operations pronouncement effective January 1, 2014. The revised pronouncement limits what qualifies for discontinued operations treatment and requires prospective application to all dispositions or assets classified as held for sale subsequent to adoption. One property, Riverpark Phase IIA, was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, and, therefore, qualified for discontinued operations treatment under the previous standard. No additional properties qualified for discontinued operations treatment during the year ended December 31, 2014. Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 consists of 20 properties that were sold during the year ended December 31, 2013 and one property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, including 12 multi-tenant retail properties, six single- user retail properties, two single-user office properties and one single-user industrial property. The 2013 dispositions aggregated 2,833,900 square feet for consideration totaling $328,045 during the year ended December 31, 2013. Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Shareholders The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a performance measure known as FFO. As defined by NAREIT, FFO means net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate, plus depreciation and amortization and impairment charges on depreciable real estate, including amounts from continuing and discontinued operations, as well as adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures in which the reporting entity holds an interest. We have adopted the NAREIT definition in our computation of FFO attributable to common shareholders. Management believes that, subject to the following limitations, FFO attributable to common shareholders provides a basis for comparing our performance and operations to those of other REITs. 33 We define Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders as FFO attributable to common shareholders excluding the impact of discrete non-operating transactions and other events which we do not consider representative of the comparable operating results of our core business platform, our real estate operating portfolio. Specific examples of discrete non-operating transactions and other events include, but are not limited to, the financial statement impact of gains or losses associated with the early extinguishment of debt or other liabilities, actual or anticipated settlement of litigation involving the Company, executive and realignment separation charges and impairment charges to write down the carrying value of assets other than depreciable real estate, which are otherwise excluded from our calculation of FFO attributable to common shareholders. We believe that FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders, which are non-GAAP performance measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the operating performance of REITs. Neither FFO attributable to common shareholders nor Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders represent alternatives to “Net income” or “Net income attributable to common shareholders” as an indicator of our performance or “Cash flows from operating activities” as determined by GAAP as a measure of our capacity to fund cash needs, including the payment of dividends. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating similarly titled measures, and accordingly, our calculation of Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs. FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders are calculated as follows: Net income attributable to common shareholders Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties Gain on sales of investment properties, net of noncontrolling interest (a) FFO attributable to common shareholders Impact on earnings from the early extinguishment of debt, net Provision for hedge ineffectiveness Joint venture investment impairment Reversal of excise tax accrual Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Executive and realignment separation charges (b) Other (c) Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ $ 115,646 213,602 19,937 (121,264) 227,921 18,864 (25) — — — 4,730 (224) 251,266 $ $ $ 33,850 216,676 72,203 (67,009) 255,720 10,479 12 — (4,594) (4,258) — (199) 257,160 $ $ $ 4,176 241,152 92,319 (70,996) 266,651 (15,914) (912) 1,834 — (3,511) — (1,349) 246,799 (a) Results for the year ended December 31, 2014 include the gain on change in control of investment properties of $24,158 recognized pursuant to the dissolution of our joint venture arrangement with our partner in our MS Inland unconsolidated joint venture on June 5, 2014. Results for the year ended December 31, 2013 include the gain on sale of joint venture interest of $17,499 and the gain on change in control of investment properties of $5,435 recognized pursuant to the dissolution of our joint venture arrangement with our partner in our RioCan unconsolidated joint venture on October 1, 2013. (b) Included in “General and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. (c) Consists of the impact on earnings from net settlements and easement proceeds, which are included in “Other income, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Liquidity and Capital Resources We anticipate that cash flows from the below-listed sources will provide adequate capital for the next 12 months and beyond for all scheduled principal and interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness, including maturing debt, current and anticipated tenant allowances or other capital obligations, the shareholder distributions required to maintain our REIT status and compliance with the financial covenants of our Unsecured Credit Facility and our unsecured notes. 34 Our primary expected sources and uses of liquidity are as follows: SOURCES USES Operating cash flow Cash and cash equivalents Available borrowings under our unsecured revolving line of credit Proceeds from capital markets transactions Proceeds from asset dispositions Tenant allowances and leasing costs Improvements made to individual properties that are not recoverable through common area maintenance charges to tenants Acquisitions Debt repayments Distribution payments Redevelopment, renovation or expansion activities New development Repurchases of our common stock We have made substantial progress over the last several years in strengthening our balance sheet and addressing debt maturities, funded primarily through asset dispositions and capital markets transactions, including public offerings of our common stock and preferred stock and private and public offerings of senior unsecured notes. As of December 31, 2015, we had $48,876 of debt scheduled to mature through the end of 2016, comprised of $35,546 related to mortgages payable maturing in 2016 and $13,330 of principal amortization related to longer-dated maturities, which we plan on satisfying through a combination of proceeds from asset dispositions, capital markets transactions and our unsecured revolving line of credit. The table below summarizes our consolidated indebtedness as of December 31, 2015: Debt Aggregate Principal Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate Fixed rate mortgages payable (a) (b) $ 1,128,505 6.08% Unsecured notes payable: Senior notes – 4.12% Series A due 2021 Senior notes – 4.58% Series B due 2024 Senior notes – 4.00% due 2025 Total unsecured notes payable (b) Unsecured credit facility (c): Term loan – fixed rate portion (d) Term loan – variable rate portion Revolving line of credit – variable rate Total unsecured credit facility (b) 100,000 150,000 250,000 500,000 300,000 150,000 100,000 550,000 Total consolidated indebtedness $ 2,178,505 4.12% 4.58% 4.00% 4.20% 1.99% 1.88% 1.93% 1.95% 4.61% Maturity Date various June 30, 2021 June 30, 2024 March 15, 2025 May 11, 2018 May 11, 2018 May 12, 2017 Weighted Average Years to Maturity 3.9 years 5.5 years 8.5 years 9.2 years 8.3 years 2.4 years 2.4 years 1.4 years 2.2 years 4.5 years (a) Includes $7,910 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate as of December 31, 2015. (b) Fixed rate mortgages payable excludes mortgage premium of $1,865, discount of $(1) and capitalized loan fees of $(7,233), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. Unsecured notes payable excludes discount of $(1,090) and capitalized loan fees of $(3,334), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. Term loan excludes capitalized loan fees of $(2,474), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. Capitalized loan fees related to the revolving line of credit are included in “Other assets, net” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. (c) Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. See Note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details. (d) Reflects $300,000 of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)-based variable rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate of 0.53875% plus a credit spread based on a leverage grid through February 2016. The applicable credit spread was 1.45% as of December 31, 2015. Mortgages Payable During the year ended December 31, 2015, we repaid or defeased mortgages payable in the total amount of $495,456 (excluding scheduled principal payments of $16,126 related to amortizing loans). The loans repaid or defeased during the year ended December 31, 2015 had a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.82%. 35 In August 2015, the servicing of the Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security (CMBS) loan encumbering The Gateway was transferred to the special servicer at our request. This servicing transfer occurred notwithstanding the fact that the CMBS loan was performing. In 2014, this property was impaired below its debt balance, which was $94,463 as of December 31, 2015. The loan was non-recourse to us, except for customary non-recourse carve-outs. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we disposed of The Gateway through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of our mortgage obligation. Unsecured Notes Payable On March 12, 2015, we completed a public offering of $250,000 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.00% notes. The 4.00% notes were priced at 99.526% of the principal amount to yield 4.058% to maturity. In addition, on June 30, 2014, we completed a private placement of $250,000 of unsecured notes, consisting of $100,000 of 4.12% Series A senior notes due 2021 and $150,000 of 4.58% Series B senior notes due 2024 (collectively, Series A and B notes). The proceeds from the 4.00% notes and the Series A and B notes were used to repay a portion of our unsecured revolving line of credit. The indenture, as supplemented, governing the 4.00% notes (the Indenture) contains customary covenants and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, we are subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum secured and total leverage ratios; (ii) a debt service coverage ratio; and (iii) maintenance of an unencumbered assets to unsecured debt ratio. The note purchase agreement governing the 4.12% Series A senior notes due 2021 and 4.58% Series B senior notes due 2024 contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the note purchase agreement, we are subject to various financial covenants, some of which are based upon the financial covenants in effect in our primary credit facility, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios; (ii) minimum interest coverage and unencumbered interest coverage ratios; and (iii) a minimum consolidated net worth. As of December 31, 2015, management believes we were in compliance with the financial covenants under the Indenture and the note purchase agreement. Unsecured Credit Facility In May 2013, we entered into our third amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions to provide for the Unsecured Credit Facility aggregating to $1,000,000, consisting of a $550,000 unsecured revolving line of credit and a $450,000 unsecured term loan. The Unsecured Credit Facility had a $450,000 accordion option that allowed us, at our election, to increase the availability thereunder up to $1,450,000, subject to (i) customary fees and conditions including, but not limited to, the absence of an event of default as defined in the agreement and (ii) our ability to obtain additional lender commitments. As of December 31, 2015, the Unsecured Credit Facility was priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. We received investment grade credit ratings from two rating agencies in 2014 and in accordance with the unsecured credit agreement, we may elect to convert to an investment grade pricing grid. As of December 31, 2015, making such an election would have resulted in a higher interest rate and, as such, we did not make the election to convert to an investment grade pricing grid. The following table summarizes the leverage-based and ratings-based credit spreads and additional pricing terms of our Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2015: Unsecured Credit Facility Term loan Revolving line of credit Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing Credit Spread 1.45% – 2.00% 1.50% – 2.05% Unused Fee N/A 0.25% – 0.30% Credit Spread 1.05% – 2.05% 0.90% – 1.70% Facility Fee N/A 0.15% – 0.35% The unsecured credit agreement contained customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the unsecured credit agreement, we were subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios, (ii) minimum fixed charge and unencumbered interest coverage ratios, and (iii) a minimum consolidated net worth requirement. As of December 31, 2015, management believes we were in compliance with the financial covenants and default provisions under the unsecured credit agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by KeyBank National Association serving as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serving as syndication agent to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000, or our 2016 Unsecured 36 Credit Facility. Our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility consists of a $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit, a $200,000 unsecured term loan and a $250,000 unsecured term loan and will be priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. The following table summarizes the key terms of our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility: 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility $200,000 unsecured term loan $250,000 unsecured term loan $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit 1/5/2021 1/5/2020 Maturity Date Extension Option Extension Fee Credit Spread Unused Fee Credit Spread Facility Fee Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing 5/11/2018 2 one year 0.15% 1.45% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.30% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.05% - 2.05% 0.90% - 1.75% N/A N/A 2 six month 0.075% 1.35% - 2.25% 0.15% - 0.25% 0.85% - 1.55% 0.125% - 0.30% Our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility has a $400,000 accordion option that allows us, at our election, to increase the total credit facility up to $1,600,000, subject to (i) customary fees and conditions including, but not limited to, the absence of an event of default as defined in the agreement and (ii) our ability to obtain additional lender commitments. The fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement, we are subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios; and (ii) minimum fixed charge and unencumbered interest coverage ratios. Debt Maturities The following table shows the scheduled maturities and principal amortization of our indebtedness as of December 31, 2015 for each of the next five years and thereafter and the weighted average interest rates by year, as well as the fair value of our indebtedness as of December 31, 2015. The table does not reflect the impact of any 2016 debt activity, such as our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Fair Value Debt: Fixed rate debt: Mortgages payable (a) $ 48,876 $ 319,633 $ 10,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 302,324 $1,128,505 $ 1,213,620 Unsecured credit facility – fixed rate portion of term loan (b) Unsecured notes payable (c) — — — — 300,000 — — — — — Total fixed rate debt 48,876 319,633 310,801 443,447 3,424 — 500,000 802,324 300,000 500,000 300,000 486,701 1,928,505 2,000,321 Variable rate debt: Unsecured credit facility — 100,000 150,000 — — — 250,000 250,000 Total debt (d) $ 48,876 $ 419,633 $ 460,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 802,324 $2,178,505 $ 2,250,321 Weighted average interest rate on debt: Fixed rate debt Variable rate debt (e) Total 4.92% — 4.92% 5.52% 1.93% 4.66% 2.16% 1.88% 2.07% 7.50% — 7.50% 4.80% — 4.80% 4.42% — 4.42% 4.96% 1.90% 4.61% (a) Includes $7,910 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate as of December 31, 2015. Excludes mortgage premium of $1,865 and discount of $(1), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (b) $300,000 of LIBOR-based variable rate debt has been swapped to a fixed rate through February 2016. The swap effectively converts one- month floating rate LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.53875% over the term of the swap. (c) Excludes discount of $(1,090), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (d) Total debt excludes capitalized loan fees of $(13,041), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015 which are included as a reduction to the respective debt balances. The weighted average years to maturity of consolidated indebtedness was 4.5 years as of December 31, 2015. The $71,816 difference between total debt outstanding and its fair value is primarily attributable to a $68,947 difference related to our IW JV pool of mortgages. This pool matures in 2019, has an interest rate of 7.50% and an outstanding principal balance of $395,402 as of December 31, 2015. (e) Represents interest rates as of December 31, 2015. We plan on addressing our debt maturities through a combination of proceeds from asset dispositions, capital markets transactions and our unsecured revolving line of credit. 37 Distributions and Equity Transactions Our distributions of current and accumulated earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes are taxable to shareholders, generally, as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits generally are treated as a non-taxable reduction of the shareholders’ basis in the shares to the extent thereof (non-dividend distributions) and thereafter as taxable gain. We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Code generally requires that a REIT annually distributes to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. The Code imposes tax on any undistributed REIT taxable income. To satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income and excise tax, we intend to make regular quarterly distributions of all, or substantially all, of our taxable income to shareholders. Our future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. When determining the amount of future distributions, we expect that our board of directors will consider, among other factors, (i) the amount of cash generated from our operating activities, (ii) our expectations of future cash flow, (iii) our determination of near-term cash needs for debt repayments, acquisitions of new properties, redevelopment opportunities and existing or future share repurchases, (iv) the timing of significant re-leasing activities and the establishment of additional cash reserves for anticipated tenant allowances and general property capital improvements, (v) our ability to continue to access additional sources of capital, (vi) the amount required to be distributed to maintain our status as a REIT and to reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay, (vii) the amount required to declare and pay in cash, or set aside for the payment of, the dividends on our Series A preferred stock for all past dividend periods, (viii) any limitations on our distributions contained in our Unsecured Credit Facility, which, as of December 31, 2015, limited our distributions to the greater of 95% of FFO, as defined in the unsecured credit agreement (which equals FFO attributable to common shareholders, as set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Funds From Operations Attributable to Common Shareholders,” excluding gains or losses from extraordinary items, impairment charges not already excluded from FFO attributable to common shareholders and other non-cash charges) or the amount necessary for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement, which does not include a similar limitation on our distributions though it does require us to distribute at least an amount necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements. In March 2013, we established an at-the-market (ATM) equity program under which we sold 5,547 shares of our Class A common stock during the year ended December 31, 2013. The shares were issued at a weighted average price per share of $15.29 for proceeds of $83,527, net of commissions and offering costs. No shares were issued during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the 2013 ATM equity program expired in November 2015. In December 2015, we established a new ATM equity program under which we may issue and sell shares of our Class A common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000, from time to time. Actual sales may depend on a variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions and the trading price of our Class A common stock. Any net proceeds are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include the funding of acquisitions and redevelopment activities and the repayment of debt, including our Unsecured Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had Class A common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 remaining available for sale under our ATM equity program. In December 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase, from time to time, up to a maximum of $250,000 of shares of our Class A common stock. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price in absolute terms and in relation to the value of our assets, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. The common stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. As of December 31, 2015, we had not repurchased any shares under this program. Capital Expenditures and Development Activity We anticipate that obligations related to capital improvements to our properties can be met with cash flows from operations and working capital. As of December 31, 2015, we owned one development property, South Billings Center located in Billings, Montana, with a carrying value of $5,157 which is not under active development. 38 Dispositions We continue to execute our long-term portfolio repositioning strategy of disposing of select non-target and single-user properties in order to facilitate our external growth initiatives. The following table highlights our property dispositions during 2015, 2014 and 2013: 2015 Dispositions 2014 Dispositions 2013 Dispositions Number of Properties Sold 26 24 20 Square Footage 3,917,200 2,490,100 2,833,900 Consideration 516,444 $ 322,989 $ 328,045 $ Aggregate Proceeds, Net (a) 505,524 $ 314,377 $ 320,574 $ Debt Extinguished $ $ $ 25,724 (b) 9,713 (b) — (c) (a) Represents total consideration net of transaction costs. 2015 dispositions include the disposition of two development properties, one of which had been held in a consolidated joint venture. (b) Excludes $95,881 and $114,404 of mortgages payable repayments or defeasances completed prior to disposition of the respective property for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. (c) Excludes $52,221 of mortgages payable repayments completed prior to disposition of the respective property. In addition, we received $19,615 of debt forgiveness during the ended December 31, 2013. In addition to the transactions presented in the preceding table, we (i) received net proceeds of $300, $1,023 and $6,192 from other transactions, including condemnation awards, earnouts and the sale of parcels at certain of our properties during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and (ii) generated aggregate net proceeds of $108,257, on a pro-rata basis, from dispositions at our unconsolidated joint ventures during the year ended December 31, 2013, which includes $95,502 related to the sale of our 20% ownership interest in eight properties owned by the RioCan joint venture in connection with the dissolution of our joint venture arrangement on October 1, 2013. Acquisitions We continue to execute our investment strategy of acquiring high quality, multi-tenant retail assets within our target markets. The following table highlights our asset acquisitions during 2015, 2014 and 2013: 2015 Acquisitions (b) 2014 Acquisitions (c) 2013 Acquisitions Number of Assets Acquired 11 11 7 Square Footage 1,179,800 1,339,400 1,088,100 Acquisition Price Pro Rata Acquisition Price (a) Mortgage Debt Pro Rata Mortgage Debt (a) $ $ $ 463,136 348,061 317,213 $ $ $ 463,136 289,561 292,256 $ $ $ — $ $ $ 141,698 67,864 — 113,358 54,291 (a) Includes amounts associated with the 2014 acquisition of our partner’s 80% ownership interest in our MS Inland unconsolidated joint venture and the 2013 acquisition of our partner’s 80% ownership interest in five properties owned by our RioCan unconsolidated joint venture, as well as acquisitions from unaffiliated third parties. (b) 2015 acquisitions include the purchase of the following: 1) a land parcel at our Lake Worth Towne Crossing multi-tenant retail operating property, 2) a single-user outparcel located at our Southlake Town Square multi-tenant retail operating property that was subject to a ground lease with us prior to the transaction, and 3) a single-user outparcel located at our Royal Oaks Village II multi-tenant retail operating property. The total number of properties in our portfolio was not affected by these transactions. (c) 2014 acquisitions include the purchase of the following: 1) the fee interest in our Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza multi-tenant retail operating property that was previously subject to a ground lease with a third party, 2) a single-user outparcel located at our Southlake Town Square multi-tenant retail operating property that was subject to a ground lease with us prior to the transaction, and 3) a parcel located at our Lakewood Towne Center multi-tenant retail operating property. The total number of properties in our portfolio was not affected by these transactions. 39 Summary of Cash Flows Cash provided by operating activities Cash provided by investing activities Cash used in financing activities (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year Cash Flows from Operating Activities Year Ended December 31, 2014 Change 2015 $ $ 265,813 25,288 (351,969) (60,868) 112,292 51,424 $ $ 254,014 77,900 (277,812) 54,102 58,190 112,292 $ 11,799 (52,612) (74,157) (114,970) Cash flows from operating activities consist primarily of net income from property operations, adjusted for the following, among others: (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii) provision for impairment of investment properties, (iii) gains on sales of investment properties, joint venture interest and change in control of investment properties, and (iv) gains on extinguishment of debt and other liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2015 increased $11,799 primarily due to the following: • • • a $12,396 reduction in cash paid for interest; a $339 decrease in cash paid for leasing fees and inducements; and ordinary course fluctuations in working capital accounts; partially offset by • a $1,476 decrease in net lease termination fees received. Cash Flows from Investing Activities Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of proceeds from the sales of investment properties and joint venture interests, net of cash paid to purchase investment properties and to fund capital expenditures and tenant improvements, in addition to changes in restricted escrows. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2015 decreased $52,612 primarily due to the following: • a $281,096 increase in cash paid to purchase investment properties; partially offset by • • a $190,424 increase in proceeds from the sales of investment properties; and a $39,101 net change in restricted escrow activity, of which $16,510 relates to acquisition deposits. We will continue to execute our investment strategy by pursuing targeted dispositions. The majority of the proceeds from disposition activity in 2016 is expected to be used to acquire high quality, multi-tenant retail assets within our target markets and repay debt. In addition, tenant improvement costs associated with re-leasing vacant space and strategic remerchandising efforts across the portfolio may continue to be significant. Cash Flows from Financing Activities Cash flows from financing activities primarily consist of distribution payments, repayments of our Unsecured Credit Facility, principal payments on mortgages payable and the purchase of U.S. Treasury Securities in connection with defeasance of mortgages payable, partially offset by proceeds from our Unsecured Credit Facility and the issuance of debt instruments and equity securities. Net cash used in financing activities in 2015 increased $74,157 primarily due to the following: • • a $249,246 increase in principal payments on mortgages payable; and an $81,283 increase in purchases of U.S. Treasury securities in connection with defeasance of mortgages payable; partially offset by • a $265,000 increase in net proceeds from our Unsecured Credit Facility. 40 We plan to continue to address our debt maturities through a combination of proceeds from asset dispositions, capital markets transactions and our unsecured revolving line of credit. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements. Contractual Obligations The table below presents our obligations and commitments to make future payments under our debt obligations and lease agreements as of December 31, 2015 and does not reflect the impact of any 2016 activity, such as our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility: Long-term debt (a): Fixed rate Variable rate Interest (d) Operating lease obligations (e) Less than 1 year (b) 1-3 years (c) 3-5 years More than 5 years Total Payment due by period $ $ 48,876 — 100,151 8,458 157,485 $ $ 630,434 250,000 158,707 16,844 1,055,985 $ $ 446,871 — 102,107 17,950 566,928 $ $ 802,324 — 94,792 510,790 1,407,906 $ $ 1,928,505 250,000 455,757 554,042 3,188,304 (a) Amounts exclude mortgage premium of $1,865, mortgage discount of $(1), unsecured notes payable discount of $(1,090) and capitalized loan fees of $(13,041), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. Fixed and variable rate amounts for each year include scheduled principal amortization payments. Interest payments related to variable rate debt were calculated using interest rates as of December 31, 2015. (b) Included in fixed rate debt is $7,910 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate through its maturity on September 30, 2016. We plan on addressing our 2016 mortgages payable maturities through a combination of proceeds from asset dispositions, capital markets transactions and our unsecured revolving line of credit. (c) Included in fixed rate debt is $300,000 of LIBOR-based variable rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate through February 2016. (d) Represents expected interest payments on our consolidated debt obligations as of December 31, 2015, including any capitalized interest. (e) We lease land under non-cancellable leases at certain of our properties expiring in various years from 2023 to 2090, not inclusive of any available option period. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or extend the terms of these leases before or at their expiration, we will lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate these properties. We lease office space under non-cancellable leases expiring in various years from 2016 to 2023. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets; capitalization of development costs; fair value measurements; provision for impairment, including estimates of holding periods, capitalization rates and discount rates (where applicable); provision for income taxes; recoverable amounts of receivables; deferred taxes and initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The following disclosure pertains to accounting policies and estimates we believe are most “critical” to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. These judgments often result from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. GAAP requires information in financial statements about accounting principles, methods used and disclosures pertaining to significant estimates. This discussion addresses our judgment pertaining to known trends, events or uncertainties which were taken into consideration upon the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions. 41 Acquisition of Investment Property We allocate the purchase price of each acquired investment property based upon the estimated acquisition date fair value of the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally include land, building and other improvements, in-place lease value, acquired above and below market lease intangibles, any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market, the value of customer relationships and goodwill, if any. Acquisition transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included within “General and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. For tangible assets acquired, including land, building and other improvements, we consider available comparable market and industry information in estimating the acquisition date fair value. We allocate a portion of the purchase price to the estimated acquired in-place lease value intangibles based on estimated lease execution costs for similar leases as well as lost rental payments during an assumed lease-up period. We also evaluate each acquired lease as compared to current market rates. If an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market, we allocate a portion of the purchase price to such above or below market leases based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease payments and estimated market rent payments over the remaining lease term. Renewal periods are included within the lease term in the calculation of above and below market lease intangibles if, based upon factors known at the acquisition date, market participants would consider it reasonably assured that the lessee would exercise such options. Acquisition accounting fair value estimates, including the discount rate used, require us to consider various factors, including, but not limited to, market knowledge, demographics, age and physical condition of the property, geographic location, size and location of tenant spaces within the acquired investment property and tenant profile. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Unconsolidated Joint Ventures Our investment properties, including developments in progress, are reviewed for potential impairment at the end of each reporting period or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. At the end of each reporting period, we separately determine whether impairment indicators exist for each property. Examples of situations considered to be impairment indicators for both operating properties and developments in progress include, but are not limited to: • • • • • • • • a substantial decline in or continued low occupancy rate or cash flow; expected significant declines in occupancy in the near future; continued difficulty in leasing space; a significant concentration of financially troubled tenants; a change in anticipated holding period; a cost accumulation or delay in project completion date significantly above and beyond the original development or redevelopment estimate; a significant decrease in market price not in line with general market trends; and any other quantitative or qualitative events or factors deemed significant by our management or board of directors. If the presence of one or more impairment indicators as described above is identified at the end of a reporting period or at any point throughout the year with respect to a property, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. An investment property is considered to be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than its current carrying value. When performing a test for recoverability or estimating the fair value of an impaired investment property, we make certain complex or subjective assumptions which include, but are not limited to: • • • projected operating cash flows considering factors such as vacancy rates, rental rates, lease terms, tenant financial strength, competitive positioning and property location; estimated holding period or various potential holding periods when considering probability-weighted scenarios; projected capital expenditures and lease origination costs; 42 • • • • estimated interest and internal costs expected to be capitalized, dates of construction completion and grand opening dates for developments in progress; projected cash flows from the eventual disposition of an operating property or development in progress using a property- specific capitalization rate; comparable selling prices; and a property-specific discount rate. We did not have any unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. When we hold investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, they are reviewed for potential impairment, in addition to impairment evaluations of the individual assets underlying these investments, each reporting period or whenever events or changes in circumstances warrant such an evaluation. To determine whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. To the extent impairment has occurred, we will record an impairment charge calculated as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value. Cost Capitalization, Depreciation and Amortization Policies Our policy is to review all expenses paid and capitalize any items which are deemed to be an upgrade or a tenant improvement. These costs are included in the investment properties financial statement caption as an addition to building and other improvements. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Building and other improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for building and associated improvements and 15 years for site improvements and most other capital improvements. Tenant improvements, leasing fees and acquired in-place lease value intangibles are amortized on a straight- line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. Acquired above and below market lease intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease, inclusive of renewal periods if market participants would consider it reasonably assured that the lessee would exercise such options, as an adjustment to rental income when we are the lessor. For acquired leases in which we are the lessee, any value attributable to above and below market lease intangibles is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to property operating expenses. Development and Redevelopment Projects During the development or redevelopment period, we capitalize direct project costs such as construction, insurance, architectural and legal, as well as certain indirect project costs such as interest, other financing costs, real estate taxes and internal salaries and related benefits of personnel directly involved in the project. Capitalization of the indirect project costs ceases and all project- related costs included in developments in progress are reclassified to land and building and other improvements at the time when development or redevelopment is considered substantially complete. Additionally, we make estimates as to the probability of completion of development and redevelopment projects. If we determine that completion of the development or redevelopment project is no longer probable, we expense any capitalized costs that are not recoverable. A project’s classification changes from development to operating when it is substantially completed and held available for occupancy, but no later than one year from the completion of major construction activity. A property is considered stabilized upon reaching 90% occupancy, but no later than one year from the date it was classified as operating, and is included in our same store portfolio when it is stabilized for the periods presented. Investment Properties Held for Sale In determining whether to classify an investment property as held for sale, we consider whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the investment property; (ii) the investment property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customary; (iii) we have initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) we believe that the sale of the investment property is probable; (v) we are actively marketing the investment property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current value, and (vi) actions required for us to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made. If all of the above criteria are met, we classify the investment property as held for sale. When these criteria are met, we suspend depreciation (including depreciation for building improvements and tenant improvements) and amortization of acquired in-place lease value intangibles and any above or below market lease intangibles and we record the investment property held for sale at 43 the lower of cost or net realizable value. The assets and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are classified as held for sale are presented separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period. Prior to our adoption of the revised discontinued operations pronouncement in 2014, if the operations and cash flow of the property had been, or were upon consummation of such sale, eliminated from ongoing operations and we did not have significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property, then the operations for the periods presented were classified in the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. However, the revised discontinued operations pronouncement, which we early adopted effective January 1, 2014, limits what qualifies for discontinued operations presentation. As a result, the investment properties that were sold or classified as held for sale during 2015 and 2014, except for Riverpark Phase IIA, which was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013 and, therefore, qualified for discontinued operations treatment under the previous standard, did not qualify for discontinued operations presentation and, as such, are reflected in continuing operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Revenue Recognition We commence revenue recognition on our leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If we are the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If we conclude that the lessee is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are accounted for as lease inducements which are amortized as a reduction to the revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, we commence revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to construct their own improvements. We consider a number of factors to evaluate whether we or the lessee are the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: • whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; • whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; • • the uniqueness of the improvements; the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; • who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements, and • whether the tenant or landlord is obligated to fund cost overruns. The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, we consider all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes its determination. Rental income, for only those leases that have fixed and measurable rent escalations, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between such rental income earned and the cash rent due under the provisions of a lease is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of “Accounts and notes receivable” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We make certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. We record lease termination income in “Other property income” upon: (i) execution of a termination letter agreement; (ii) when all of the conditions of such agreement have been fulfilled; (iii) the tenant is no longer occupying the property and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. Upon early lease termination, we may record losses related to recognized tenant specific intangibles and other assets or adjust the remaining useful life of the assets if determined to be appropriate. Our policy for percentage rental income is to defer recognition of contingent rental income until the specified target (i.e. breakpoint) that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved. 44 Profits from sales of real estate are not recognized under the full accrual method unless: (i) a sale is consummated; (ii) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; (iii) our receivable, if applicable, is not subject to future subordination; (iv) we have transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership, and (v) we do not have substantial continuing involvement with the property. Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Accounts and notes receivable balances outstanding include base rents, tenant reimbursements and deferred rent receivables. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accounts receivable is determined on a tenant-specific basis through an analysis of balances outstanding, historical bad debt levels, tenant creditworthiness and current economic trends. Additionally, estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims with respect to tenants in bankruptcy are considered in assessing the collectibility of the related receivables. As these factors change, the allowance is subject to revision and may impact our results of operations. Management’s estimate of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. Income Taxes We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the taxable income we currently distribute to our shareholders. We record a benefit, based on the GAAP measurement criteria, for uncertain income tax positions if the result of a tax position meets a “more likely than not” recognition threshold. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, the concept of extraordinary items is eliminated from GAAP and entities are no longer required to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary. However, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently is retained. We elected to early adopt this pronouncement effective January 1, 2015. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, companies are required to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, excluding revolving debt arrangements, as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of that debt liability on the balance sheet. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected. We elected to early adopt this pronouncement effective December 31, 2015. This pronouncement requires a full retrospective method of adoption and the adoption resulted in the reclassification of $15,730 of unamortized capitalized loan fees as of December 31, 2014 from “Other assets” to direct reductions of our indebtedness on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the adoption resulted in the reclassification of $141 of unamortized capitalized loan fees from “Assets associated with investment properties held for sale” to “Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net.” Unamortized capitalized loan fees attributable to our unsecured revolving line of credit continue to be recorded in “Other assets” as they relate to a revolving debt arrangement. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, a company’s management is required to assess the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern every reporting period, including interim periods, for a period of one year after the date the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued) and provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 will not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, companies are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities under a revised consolidation model. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model, which modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and provides a scope exception from consolidation guidance for registered money market funds. This pronouncement allows either a full or a modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 under the modified retrospective method will not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, the acquirer in a business combination is required to recognize any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined and is no longer required to retrospectively account for those adjustments. A company must present 45 separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 will not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2017, registrants will be required to disclose the following in any annual report, proxy or information statement, or registration statement that requires executive compensation disclosure: 1) the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees (excluding the chief executive officer), 2) the annual total compensation of its chief executive officer, and 3) the ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees to the annual total compensation of its chief executive officer. We do not expect the adoption of this final rule will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2017, companies will be required to apply a five- step model in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of this revised revenue model is that a company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Lease contracts will be excluded from this revenue recognition criteria; however, the sale of real estate will be required to follow the new model. This pronouncement allows either a full or a modified retrospective method of adoption. Expanded quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding revenue recognition will be required for contracts that are subject to this guidance. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements; however, we will continue to evaluate this assessment until the guidance becomes effective. Inflation Certain of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling us to receive payment of additional rent calculated as a percentage of tenants’ gross sales above predetermined thresholds, which generally increase as prices rise, and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. While most escalation clauses are fixed in nature, some may include increases based upon changes in the consumer price index or similar inflation indices. In addition, many of our leases are for terms of less than 10 years, which permits us to seek to increase rents to market rates upon renewal. Most of our leases require the tenant to pay an allocable share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Subsequent Events Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we: • • • entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. See Note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details; closed on the acquisition of a two-property portfolio consisting of Shoppes at Hagerstown, a 113,200 square foot multi- tenant retail property located in Hagerstown, Maryland, for a gross purchase price of $27,055 and Merrifield Town Center II, a 138,000 square foot property, consisting of 76,000 square feet of retail space and 62,000 square feet of storage space, located in Falls Church, Virginia, for a gross purchase price of $45,676; closed on the disposition of The Gateway, a 623,200 square foot multi-tenant retail property located in Salt Lake City, Utah, through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of our mortgage obligation. Immediately prior to the disposition, the lender reduced our loan obligation to $75,000 which was assumed by the buyer in connection with the disposition, resulting in an anticipated gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13,653 and an anticipated gain on sale of approximately $3,868; and • closed on the disposition of Stateline Station, a 142,600 square foot multi-tenant retail property located in Kansas City, Missouri, for a sales price of $17,500 with an anticipated gain on sale of approximately $4,253. 46 On February 11, 2016, our board of directors declared the cash dividend for the first quarter of 2016 for our 7.00% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. The dividend of $0.4375 per preferred share will be paid on March 31, 2016 to preferred shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2016. On February 11, 2016, our board of directors declared the distribution for the first quarter of 2016 of $0.165625 per share on our outstanding Class A common stock, which will be paid on April 8, 2016 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2016. 47 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our long-term debt that is used to maintain liquidity and fund our operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed rates, and in some cases variable rates with the ability to convert to fixed rates. With regard to variable rate financing, we assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows. As of December 31, 2015, we had $307,910 of variable rate debt based on LIBOR that has been swapped to fixed rate debt through interest rate swaps. Our interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2015 are summarized in the following table: Fixed rate portion of Unsecured Credit Facility Heritage Towne Crossing Notional Amount $ $ 300,000 7,910 307,910 Termination Date February 24, 2016 September 30, 2016 Fair Value of Derivative Liability $ $ 32 53 85 A decrease of 1% in market interest rates would result in a hypothetical increase in our derivative liability of approximately $141. The combined carrying amount of our mortgages payable, unsecured notes payable and Unsecured Credit Facility is approximately $84,083 lower than the fair value as of December 31, 2015. We may use additional derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates. To the extent we do, we are exposed to market and credit risk. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, we generally are not exposed to the credit risk of the counterparty. We minimize credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with the same party providing the financing, with the right of offset, or by entering into transactions with highly rated counterparties. 48 Debt Maturities Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The following table shows the scheduled maturities and principal amortization of our indebtedness as of December 31, 2015, for each of the next five years and thereafter and the weighted average interest rates by year, as well as the fair value of our indebtedness as of December 31, 2015. The table does not reflect the impact of any 2016 debt activity, such as our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Fair Value Debt: Fixed rate debt: Mortgages payable (a) $ 48,876 $ 319,633 $ 10,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 302,324 $1,128,505 $ 1,213,620 Unsecured credit facility – fixed rate portion of term loan (b) Unsecured notes payable (c) — — — — 300,000 — — — — — Total fixed rate debt 48,876 319,633 310,801 443,447 3,424 — 500,000 802,324 300,000 500,000 300,000 486,701 1,928,505 2,000,321 Variable rate debt: Unsecured credit facility — 100,000 150,000 — — — 250,000 250,000 Total debt (d) $ 48,876 $ 419,633 $ 460,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 802,324 $2,178,505 $ 2,250,321 Weighted average interest rate on debt: Fixed rate debt Variable rate debt (e) Total 4.92% — 4.92% 5.52% 1.93% 4.66% 2.16% 1.88% 2.07% 7.50% — 7.50% 4.80% — 4.80% 4.42% — 4.42% 4.96% 1.90% 4.61% (a) Includes $7,910 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate as of December 31, 2015. Excludes mortgage premium of $1,865 and discount of $(1), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (b) $300,000 of LIBOR-based variable rate debt has been swapped to a fixed rate through February 2016. The swap effectively converts one- month floating rate LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.53875% over the term of the swap. (c) Excludes discount of $(1,090), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (d) Total debt excludes capitalized loan fees of $(13,041), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015 which are included as a reduction to the respective debt balances. The weighted average years to maturity of consolidated indebtedness was 4.5 years as of December 31, 2015. The $71,816 difference between total debt outstanding and its fair value is primarily attributable to a $68,947 difference related to our IW JV pool of mortgages. This pool matures in 2019, has an interest rate of 7.50% and an outstanding principal balance of $395,402 as of December 31, 2015. (e) Represents interest rates as of December 31, 2015. We had $250,000 of variable rate debt, excluding $307,910 of variable rate debt that has been swapped to fixed rate debt and debt issuance costs, with interest rates varying based upon LIBOR, with a weighted average interest rate of 1.90% as of December 31, 2015. An increase in the variable interest rate on this debt constitutes a market risk. If interest rates increase by 1% based on debt outstanding as of December 31, 2015, interest expense would increase by approximately $2,500 on an annualized basis. The table incorporates only those interest rate exposures that existed as of December 31, 2015. It does not consider those interest rate exposures or positions that could arise after that date. The information presented herein is merely an estimate and has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the interest rate exposures that arise during future periods, our hedging strategies at that time and future changes in interest rates. 49 Subsequent to December 31, 2015, we entered into our fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by KeyBank National Association serving as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serving as syndication agent to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. Our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility consists of a $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit, a $200,000 unsecured term loan and a $250,000 unsecured term loan and will be priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. The following table summarizes the key terms of our 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility: 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility $200,000 unsecured term loan $250,000 unsecured term loan $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit 1/5/2021 1/5/2020 Maturity Date Extension Option Extension Fee Credit Spread Unused Fee Credit Spread Facility Fee Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing 5/11/2018 2 one year 0.15% 1.45% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.30% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.05% - 2.05% 0.90% - 1.75% N/A N/A 2 six month 0.075% 1.35% - 2.25% 0.15% - 0.25% 0.85% - 1.55% 0.125% - 0.30% 50 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Schedule II) Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III) Schedules not filed: 52 53 54 55 56 58 93 94 All schedules other than the two listed in the Index have been omitted as the required information is either not applicable or the information is already presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto. 51 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Retail Properties of America, Inc. Oak Brook, Illinois We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Retail Properties of America, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Retail Properties of America, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for and disclosure of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Chicago, Illinois February 17, 2016 52 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except par value amounts) Assets Investment properties: Land Building and other improvements Developments in progress Less accumulated depreciation Net investment properties Cash and cash equivalents Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowances of $7,910 and $7,497, respectively) Acquired lease intangible assets, net Assets associated with investment properties held for sale Other assets, net Total assets Liabilities and Equity Liabilities: Mortgages payable, net Unsecured notes payable, net Unsecured term loan, net Unsecured revolving line of credit Accounts payable and accrued expenses Distributions payable Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net Other liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) Equity: Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 7.00% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, 5,400 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014; liquidation preference $135,000 Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 475,000 shares authorized, 237,267 and 236,602 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively Additional paid-in capital Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total shareholders’ equity Noncontrolling interest Total equity Total liabilities and equity See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 $ $ $ $ 1,254,131 4,428,554 5,157 5,687,842 (1,433,195) 4,254,647 51,424 82,804 138,766 — 93,610 4,621,251 1,123,136 495,576 447,526 100,000 69,800 39,297 114,834 — 75,745 2,465,914 5 237 4,931,395 (2,776,215) (85) 2,155,337 — 2,155,337 4,621,251 $ $ $ $ 1,195,369 4,442,446 42,561 5,680,376 (1,365,471) 4,314,905 112,292 86,013 125,490 33,499 115,790 4,787,989 1,623,729 248,541 446,465 — 61,129 39,187 100,641 8,062 70,860 2,598,614 5 237 4,922,864 (2,734,688) (537) 2,187,881 1,494 2,189,375 4,787,989 53 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income (in thousands, except per share amounts) Revenues Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Total revenues Expenses Property operating expenses Real estate taxes Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties General and administrative expenses Total expenses Operating income Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net Gain on sale of joint venture interest Gain on change in control of investment properties Interest expense Other income, net Income (loss) from continuing operations Discontinued operations: (Loss) income, net Gain on sales of investment properties Income from discontinued operations Gain on sales of investment properties Net income Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest Net income attributable to the Company Preferred stock dividends Net income attributable to common shareholders Earnings (loss) per common share – basic and diluted: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders Net income Other comprehensive income: Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments (Note 10) Comprehensive income Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest Comprehensive income attributable to the Company Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ $ $ $ $ 472,344 119,536 12,080 603,960 94,780 82,810 214,706 19,937 50,657 462,890 141,070 — — — — (138,938) 1,700 3,832 — — — 121,792 125,624 (528) 125,096 (9,450) 115,646 0.49 — 0.49 125,624 452 126,076 (528) 125,548 $ $ $ $ $ $ 474,684 115,719 10,211 600,614 96,798 78,773 215,966 72,203 34,229 497,969 102,645 4,258 (2,088) — 24,158 (133,835) 5,459 597 (148) 655 507 42,196 43,300 — 43,300 (9,450) 33,850 0.14 — 0.14 43,300 201 43,501 — 43,501 $ $ $ $ $ $ 433,591 101,962 15,955 551,508 89,067 71,191 222,710 59,486 31,533 473,987 77,521 — (1,246) 17,499 5,435 (146,805) 4,741 (42,855) 9,396 41,279 50,675 5,806 13,626 — 13,626 (9,450) 4,176 (0.20) 0.22 0.02 13,626 516 14,142 — 14,142 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic 236,380 236,184 234,134 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted 236,382 236,187 234,134 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 54 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Equity (in thousands, except per share amounts) Preferred Stock Class A Common Stock Class B Common Stock Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income Total Shareholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interest Total Equity $ 4,835,370 $ (2,460,093) $ (1,254) $ 2,374,259 $ 1,494 $ 2,375,753 Balance as of January 1, 2013 5,400 $ Net income Other comprehensive income Distributions declared to preferred shareholders ($1.7986 per share) Distributions declared to common shareholders ($0.6625 per share) Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs Issuance of restricted shares Conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures Shares withheld for employee taxes Balance as of December 31, 2013 Net income Other comprehensive income Distributions declared to preferred shareholders ($1.75 per share) Distributions declared to common shareholders ($0.6625 per share) Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs Issuance of restricted shares Exercise of stock options Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures Shares withheld for employee taxes Balance as of December 31, 2014 Net income Other comprehensive income Distribution upon dissolution of consolidated joint venture Distributions declared to preferred shareholders ($1.75 per share) Distributions declared to common shareholders ($0.6625 per share) Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs Issuance of restricted shares Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures Shares withheld for employee taxes Balance as of December 31, 2015 — — — — — — — — — 5,400 $ — $ — — — — — — — — 5,400 $ — $ — — — — — — — — 5,400 $ 5 — — — — — — — — — 5 — — — — — — — — — 5 — — — — — — — — — 5 133,606 $ 133 97,037 $ — — — — 5,547 116 97,037 — (4) — — — — 5 — 98 — — — — — — — — (97,037) — — 98 — — — — — — (98) — — — — — — 83,491 — — 817 (45) 13,626 — (9,713) (155,616) — — — — — — 516 — — — — — — — 13,626 516 (9,713) (155,616) 83,496 — — 817 (45) 236,302 $ 236 — $ — $ 4,919,633 $ (2,611,796) $ (738) $ 2,307,340 — $ — — — — 303 2 — (5) — — — — — 1 — — — — $ — $ — $ 43,300 $ — $ 43,300 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (145) — 23 3,420 (67) — (9,450) (156,742) — — — — — 201 — — — — — — — 201 (9,450) (156,742) (145) 1 23 3,420 (67) 236,602 $ 237 — $ — $ 4,922,864 $ (2,734,688) $ (537) $ 2,187,881 — $ — — — — — 801 (4) (132) — — — — — — — — — — $ — $ — $ 125,096 $ — $ 125,096 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (216) — 10,755 (2,008) — — (9,450) (157,173) — — — — 452 — — — — — — — 452 — (9,450) (157,173) (216) — 10,755 (2,008) $ $ $ $ — — — — — — — — — 13,626 516 (9,713) (155,616) 83,496 — — 817 (45) 1,494 $ 2,308,834 — $ 43,300 — — — — — — — — 201 (9,450) (156,742) (145) 1 23 3,420 (67) 1,494 $ 2,189,375 528 $ 125,624 — 452 (2,022) (2,022) — — — — — — (9,450) (157,173) (216) — 10,755 (2,008) 237,267 $ 237 — $ — $ 4,931,395 $ (2,776,215) $ (85) $ 2,155,337 $ — $ 2,155,337 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 55 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities $ 125,624 $ 43,300 $ 13,626 (including discontinued operations): Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties Gain on sales of investment properties Gain on extinguishment of debt Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Gain on sale of joint venture interest Gain on change in control of investment properties Amortization of loan fees and debt premium and discount, net Amortization of stock-based compensation Premium paid in connection with defeasance of mortgages payable Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net Distributions on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures Payment of leasing fees and inducements Changes in accounts receivable, net Changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses, net Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net Other, net Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Changes in restricted escrows, net Purchase of investment properties Capital expenditures and tenant improvements Proceeds from sales of investment properties Investment in developments in progress Proceeds from sale of joint venture interest Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures Distributions of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures Other, net Net cash provided by investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from mortgages payable Principal payments on mortgages and notes payable Proceeds from unsecured notes payable Proceeds from unsecured credit facility Repayments of unsecured credit facility Payment of loan fees and deposits, net Purchase of U.S. Treasury securities in connection with defeasance of mortgages payable Proceeds from issuance of common stock Distributions paid Other, net Net cash used in financing activities Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year 56 214,706 19,937 (121,792) — — — — 5,129 10,755 17,343 — — (8,184) 4,420 1,976 (469) (3,632) 265,813 22,344 (454,085) (45,649) 505,824 (2,371) — — — (775) 25,288 1,049 (441,490) 248,815 610,000 (510,000) (2,243) (87,435) — (166,513) (4,152) (351,969) 215,966 72,203 (42,851) — (4,258) — (24,158) 4,926 3,420 1,322 2,088 1,360 (8,523) (5,762) 3,220 (7,499) (740) 254,014 (16,757) (172,989) (44,442) 315,400 (2,992) — (25) — (295) 77,900 3,541 (192,244) 250,000 375,500 (540,500) (1,615) (6,152) — (166,143) (199) (277,812) 233,785 92,033 (47,085) (26,331) (3,511) (17,499) (5,435) 10,032 479 — 1,246 7,105 (12,930) (2,574) (6,043) (4,836) 7,570 239,632 22,360 (237,520) (51,221) 326,766 (1,468) 53,073 (9,640) 862 — 103,212 940 (571,870) — 630,000 (395,000) (5,454) — 84,835 (164,391) (1,783) (422,723) (60,868) 112,292 51,424 $ 54,102 58,190 112,292 $ (79,879) 138,069 $ 58,190 (continued) RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 Supplemental cash flow disclosure, including non-cash activities: Cash paid for interest Distributions payable Accrued capital expenditures and tenant improvements Developments in progress placed in service U.S. Treasury securities transferred in connection with defeasance of mortgages payable Defeasance of mortgages payable Forgiveness of mortgage debt Forgiveness of accrued interest, net of escrows held by the lender Shares of Class B common stock converted to Class A common stock Purchase of investment properties (after credits at closing and including acquisition $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 115,249 39,297 6,079 2,288 87,435 70,092 $ $ $ $ $ $ 127,645 39,187 6,731 4,047 6,152 4,830 $ $ $ $ $ $ 144,975 39,138 6,662 523 — — — $ — $ — — $ 19,615 — $ 6,716 — 97,036 of our partners’ joint venture interests): Land, building and other improvements, net Accounts receivable, acquired lease intangibles and other assets Acquired ground lease intangibles Accounts payable, acquired lease intangibles and other liabilities Mortgages payable assumed, net Gain on change in control of investment properties Proceeds from sales of investment properties: Net investment properties Accounts receivable, acquired lease intangibles and other assets Accounts payable, acquired lease intangibles and other liabilities Mortgages payable Deferred gains Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Gain on sales of investment properties Proceeds from sale of joint venture ownership interest: Investment in unconsolidated joint venture Other assets and other liabilities Deferred gain Gain on sale of joint venture interest $ (442,763) $ (337,906) $ (298,695) (41,597) 14,791 13,369 69,177 5,435 $ (454,085) $ (172,989) $ (237,520) (31,116) — 25,390 146,485 24,158 (47,498) — 36,176 — — $ $ $ $ 379,419 8,959 (4,378) — 32 — 121,792 505,824 $ $ 265,127 12,053 (4,631) — — — 42,851 315,400 $ $ 275,749 15,928 (14,368) (26) (1,113) 3,511 47,085 326,766 — $ — — — — $ — $ — — — — $ 35,574 (447) 447 17,499 53,073 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 57 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (1) Organization and Basis of Presentation Retail Properties of America, Inc. (the Company) was formed on March 5, 2003 to own and operate high quality, strategically located shopping centers in the United States. The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Company believes it qualifies for taxation as a REIT and, as such, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to its shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. The Company has one wholly-owned subsidiary that has jointly elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS) and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate tax rates. The income tax expense incurred by the TRS did not have a material impact on the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets, capitalization of development costs, fair value measurements, provision for impairment, including estimates of holding periods, capitalization rates and discount rates (where applicable), provision for income taxes, recoverable amounts of receivables, deferred taxes and initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company elected to early adopt the accounting pronouncement related to the presentation of debt issuance costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets effective December 31, 2015 (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further details). The adoption, which is applied retrospectively, resulted in the following reclassifications of unamortized capitalized loan fees as of December 31, 2014: Assets associated with investment properties held for sale Other assets, net Mortgages payable, net Unsecured notes payable, net Unsecured term loan, net Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net $ $ Originally Reported 33,640 131,520 1,634,465 250,000 450,000 8,203 Reclassification (141) $ (15,730) $ (10,736) (1,459) (3,535) (141) $ $ Adjusted 33,499 115,790 1,623,729 248,541 446,465 8,062 All share amounts and dollar amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are stated in thousands with the exception of per share amounts and per square foot amounts. Square foot and per square foot amounts are unaudited. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, as well as all wholly-owned subsidiaries. Wholly-owned subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies (LLCs), limited partnerships (LPs) and statutory trusts. As of December 31, 2015, all of the Company’s properties were wholly owned and consisted of 199 operating properties and one development property. The Company consolidates property-holding entities and other subsidiaries in which it owns less than a 100% interest if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity (VIE). An entity is a VIE if, among other aspects, the equity investment at risk is not sufficient for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; or, as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk do not possess the power to direct the activities that most substantially impact the entity’s economic performance or possess the obligation to absorb expected losses or right to receive expected residual returns. The Company also consolidates entities that are not VIEs in which it has a controlling financial interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in real estate joint ventures in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but does not have a controlling financial interest, are accounted for pursuant to the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the Company’s share of the loss of these unconsolidated joint ventures is included in “Equity 58 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity in a consolidated subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to the Company. In the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to common shareholders and noncontrolling interests. Consolidated statements of equity are included in the annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for total shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity. Noncontrolling interests are adjusted for additional contributions from and distributions to noncontrolling interest holders, as well as the noncontrolling interest holders’ share of the net income or loss of each respective entity, as applicable. The Company evaluates the classification and presentation of noncontrolling interests associated with consolidated joint venture investments, if any, on an ongoing basis as facts and circumstances necessitate. On October 29, 2015, the Company dissolved its remaining less-than-wholly owned consolidated joint venture concurrent with the sale of Green Valley Crossing to an affiliate of the joint venture partner. The Company was entitled to a preferred return on its capital contributions to the entity. The noncontrolling interest holder was allocated $528 as its share of the gain on sale of the development property and received a distribution of $2,022 upon dissolution of the joint venture. No adjustments to the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest for contributions, distributions or allocation of net income or loss were made during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. As of December 31, 2015, the Company did not have any less-than-wholly-owned consolidated entities. (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Investment Properties: Investment properties are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for significant improvements are capitalized. The Company allocates the purchase price of each acquired investment property based upon the estimated acquisition date fair value of the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which generally include land, building and other improvements, in-place lease value, acquired above and below market lease intangibles, any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market, the value of customer relationships and goodwill, if any. Acquisition transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included within “General and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. For tangible assets acquired, including land, building and other improvements, the Company considers available comparable market and industry information in estimating acquisition date fair value. The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to the estimated acquired in-place lease value intangibles based on estimated lease execution costs for similar leases as well as lost rental payments during an assumed lease-up period. The Company also evaluates each acquired lease as compared to current market rates. If an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market, the Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to such above or below market leases based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease payments and estimated market rent payments over the remaining lease term. Renewal periods are included within the lease term in the calculation of above and below market lease values if, based upon factors known at the acquisition date, market participants would consider it reasonably assured that the lessee would exercise such options. Acquisition accounting fair value estimates, including the discount rate used, require the Company to consider various factors, including, but not limited to, market knowledge, demographics, age and physical condition of the property, geographic location, size and location of tenant spaces within the acquired investment property and tenant profile. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease value intangibles is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. The Company incurred amortization expense pertaining to acquired in-place lease value intangibles of $25,913, $28,977 and $32,241 (including $0, $0 and $1,717, respectively, reflected as discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. With respect to acquired leases in which the Company is the lessor, the portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above and below market lease intangibles is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to rental income. Amortization pertaining to above market lease intangibles of $4,807, $4,170 and $3,053 (including $0, $0 and $25, respectively, reflected as discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was recorded as a reduction to rental income. Amortization pertaining to below market lease intangibles of $8,428, $6,246 and $4,187 59 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (including $0, $0 and $183, respectively, reflected as discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was recorded as an increase to rental income. With respect to acquired leases in which the Company is the lessee, the portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above and below market ground lease intangibles is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to property operating expenses. Amortization pertaining to above market ground lease intangibles of $560, $560 and $93 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was recorded as a reduction to property operating expenses. The following table presents the amortization during the next five years and thereafter related to the acquired lease intangible assets and liabilities for properties owned as of December 31, 2015: Amortization of: Acquired above market lease intangibles (a) Acquired in-place lease value intangibles (a) Acquired lease intangible assets, net (b) Acquired below market lease intangibles (a) Acquired ground lease intangibles (c) Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net (b) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total $ $ $ $ 3,968 20,724 24,692 (5,946) (560) (6,506) $ $ $ $ 3,499 17,420 20,919 (5,786) (560) (6,346) $ $ $ $ 2,970 14,164 17,134 (5,596) (560) (6,156) $ $ $ $ 1,760 10,812 12,572 (5,354) (560) (5,914) $ $ $ $ 1,238 8,805 10,043 (5,208) (560) (5,768) $ $ $ $ 4,301 49,105 53,406 $ $ 17,736 121,030 138,766 (73,366) (10,778) $ (101,256) (13,578) (84,144) $ (114,834) (a) Represents the portion of the purchase price with respect to acquired leases in which the Company is the lessor. The amortization of acquired above and below market lease intangibles is recorded as an adjustment to rental income and the amortization of acquired in-place lease value intangibles is recorded to depreciation and amortization expense. (b) Acquired lease intangible assets, net and acquired lease intangible liabilities, net are presented net of $304,145 and $48,758 of accumulated amortization, respectively, as of December 31, 2015. (c) Represents the portion of the purchase price with respect to acquired leases in which the Company is the lessee. The amortization is recorded as an adjustment to property operating expenses. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Building and other improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for building and associated improvements and 15 years for site improvements and most other capital improvements. Tenant improvements and leasing fees, including capitalized internal leasing incentives, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. The Company capitalized $474, $0 and $0 of internal leasing incentives during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: The Company’s investment properties, including developments in progress, are reviewed for potential impairment at the end of each reporting period or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. At the end of each reporting period, the Company separately determines whether impairment indicators exist for each property. Examples of situations considered to be impairment indicators for both operating properties and developments in progress include, but are not limited to: • • • • • • • • a substantial decline in or continued low occupancy rate or cash flow; expected significant declines in occupancy in the near future; continued difficulty in leasing space; a significant concentration of financially troubled tenants; a change in anticipated holding period; a cost accumulation or delay in project completion date significantly above and beyond the original development or redevelopment estimate; a significant decrease in market price not in line with general market trends; and any other quantitative or qualitative events or factors deemed significant by the Company’s management or board of directors. 60 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements If the presence of one or more impairment indicators as described above is identified at the end of a reporting period or at any point throughout the year with respect to a property, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. An investment property is considered to be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than its current carrying value. When performing a test for recoverability or estimating the fair value of an impaired investment property, the Company makes certain complex or subjective assumptions which include, but are not limited to: • • • • • • • projected operating cash flows considering factors such as vacancy rates, rental rates, lease terms, tenant financial strength, competitive positioning and property location; estimated holding period or various potential holding periods when considering probability-weighted scenarios; projected capital expenditures and lease origination costs; estimated interest and internal costs expected to be capitalized, dates of construction completion and grand opening dates for developments in progress; projected cash flows from the eventual disposition of an operating property or development in progress using a property- specific capitalization rate; comparable selling prices; and a property-specific discount rate. The Company did not have any unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. When the Company holds investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, they are reviewed for potential impairment, in addition to impairment evaluations of the individual assets underlying these investments, each reporting period or whenever events or changes in circumstances warrant such an evaluation. To determine whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until the carrying value is fully recovered. To the extent impairment has occurred, the Company will record an impairment charge calculated as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value. Below is a summary of impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: Impairment of consolidated properties (a) Impairment of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures (b) Impairment of properties recorded at unconsolidated joint ventures (c) Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ $ 19,937 — — $ $ $ 72,203 — — $ $ $ 92,033 1,834 286 (a) Included in “Provision for impairment of investment properties” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, except for $32,547 which is included in discontinued operations in 2013. (b) Included in “Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income and represents the aggregate impairment charge recorded to write down the Company’s investment in its Hampton Retail Colorado, L.L.C. (Hampton) joint venture, which was dissolved during 2013. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. (c) Reflected within “Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income and represents the Company’s proportionate share of property-level impairment charges recorded at its unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company’s assessment of impairment as of December 31, 2015 was based on the most current information available to the Company. If the operating conditions mentioned above deteriorate or if the Company’s expected holding period for assets change, subsequent tests for impairment could result in additional impairment charges in the future. The Company can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to the Company’s investment properties will not occur in 2016 or future periods. Based upon current market conditions, certain of the Company’s properties may have fair values less than their carrying amounts. However, based on the Company’s plans with respect to those properties, the Company believes that their carrying amounts are recoverable and therefore, under applicable GAAP guidance, no additional impairment charges were recorded. Accordingly, the 61 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Company will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether additional impairment charges are warranted. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Development and Redevelopment Projects: During the development or redevelopment period, the Company capitalizes direct project costs such as construction, insurance, architectural and legal, as well as certain indirect project costs such as interest, other financing costs, real estate taxes and internal salaries and related benefits of personnel directly involved in the project. Capitalization of the indirect project costs ceases and all project-related costs included in developments in progress are reclassified to land and building and other improvements at the time when development or redevelopment is considered substantially complete. Additionally, the Company makes estimates as to the probability of completion of development and redevelopment projects. If the Company determines that completion of the development or redevelopment project is no longer probable, the Company expenses any capitalized costs that are not recoverable. The Company did not capitalize any indirect project costs related to development, redevelopment or other property improvements during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Investment Properties Held for Sale: In determining whether to classify an investment property as held for sale, the Company considers whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the investment property; (ii) the investment property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customary; (iii) the Company has initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) the Company believes that the sale of the investment property is probable; (v) the Company is actively marketing the investment property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current value, and (vi) actions required for the Company to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made. If all of the above criteria are met, the Company classifies the investment property as held for sale. When these criteria are met, the Company suspends depreciation (including depreciation for tenant improvements and building improvements) and amortization of acquired in-place lease value intangibles and any above or below market lease intangibles and the Company records the investment property held for sale at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The assets and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are classified as held for sale are presented separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period. No properties qualified for held for sale accounting treatment as of December 31, 2015 and two properties were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. Prior to the Company’s early adoption of the revised discontinued operations pronouncement in 2014, if the operations and cash flow of the property had been, or were upon consummation of such sale, eliminated from ongoing operations and the Company did not have significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property, then the operations for the periods presented were classified in the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. However, the Company elected to early adopt the revised discontinued operations pronouncement effective January 1, 2014, which limits what qualifies for discontinued operations presentation. As a result, the investment properties that were sold or classified as held for sale during 2015 and 2014, except for Riverpark Phase IIA, which was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013 and, therefore, qualified for discontinued operations treatment under the previous standard, did not qualify for discontinued operations presentation and, as such, are reflected in continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Partially-Owned Entities: If the Company determines that it holds a financial interest in a VIE that is deemed to be a controlling financial interest, it will consolidate the entity as the primary beneficiary. The Company assesses its interests in variable interest entities on an ongoing basis to determine whether or not it is a primary beneficiary. Partially-owned, non-variable interest joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling financial interest are consolidated. Partially-owned, non-variable interest joint ventures in which the Company does not have a controlling financial interest, but has the ability to exercise significant influence, will not be consolidated but rather accounted for pursuant to the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for more information. Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at major financial institutions. The cash and cash equivalent balance at one or more of these financial institutions exceeds the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance coverage. The Company periodically assesses the credit risk associated with these financial institutions and believes that the risk of loss is minimal. Restricted Cash and Escrows: Restricted cash and escrows consist of lenders’ escrows and funds restricted through lender or other agreements, including funds held in escrow for future acquisitions, and are included as a component of “Other assets, net” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had $35,804 and $58,469, respectively, in restricted cash and escrows. 62 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Derivative and Hedging Activities: Derivatives are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value within “Other liabilities.” The Company uses interest rate derivatives to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash payments principally related to certain of its borrowings. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. On the date that the Company enters into a derivative, it may designate the derivative as a hedge against the variability of cash flows that are to be paid in connection with a recognized liability. Subsequent changes in the fair value of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge that is determined to be highly effective are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” and are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2015, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss relating to derivatives was $85. Any hedge ineffectiveness or changes in the fair value for any derivative not designated as a hedge is reported in “Other income, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations: The Company evaluates the potential impact of conditional asset retirement obligations on its consolidated financial statements. The term conditional asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Based upon the Company’s evaluation, no accrual of a liability for asset retirement obligations was warranted as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. Revenue Recognition: The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If the Company is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes that the lessee is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are accounted for as lease inducements which are amortized as a reduction to the revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, the Company commences revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to construct their own improvements. The Company considers a number of factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: • whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; • whether the tenant or the Company retains legal title to the improvements; • • the uniqueness of the improvements; the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; • who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements, and • whether the tenant or the Company is obligated to fund cost overruns. The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, the Company considers all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes its determination. Rental income, for only those leases that have fixed and measurable rent escalations, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between such rental income earned and the cash rent due under the provisions of a lease is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of “Accounts and notes receivable” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company records lease termination income in “Other property income” upon execution of a termination letter agreement, when all of the conditions of such agreement have been fulfilled, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and collectibility is reasonably assured. Upon early lease termination, the Company provides for losses related to recognized tenant specific 63 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements intangibles and other assets or adjusts the remaining useful life of the assets if determined to be appropriate. The Company recorded lease termination income of $3,757, $2,667 and $15,787 (including $0, $0 and $7,182, respectively, reflected as discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company recorded percentage rental income in lieu of base rent and other contingent percentage rental income of $4,693, $5,229 and $4,744 (including $0, $0 and $55, respectively, reflected as discontinued operations) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s policy is to defer recognition of contingent rental income until the specified target (i.e. breakpoint) that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved. Profits from sales of real estate are not recognized under the full accrual method until the following criteria are met: a sale is consummated; the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; the Company’s receivable, if applicable, is not subject to future subordination; the Company has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and rewards of ownership; and the Company does not have substantial continuing involvement with the property. The Company sold 26, 24 and 20 consolidated investment properties during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Accounts and notes receivable balances outstanding include base rents, tenant reimbursements and deferred rent receivables. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of accounts and notes receivable is determined on a tenant-specific basis through an analysis of balances outstanding, historical bad debt levels, tenant creditworthiness and current economic trends. Additionally, estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post- petition claims with respect to tenants in bankruptcy are considered in assessing the collectibility of the related receivables. Management’s estimate of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. Rental Expense: Rental expense associated with land and office space that the Company leases under non-cancellable operating leases, for only those leases that have fixed and measurable rent escalations, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental expense incurred on a straight-line basis and rental payments due under the provisions of a lease agreement is recorded as a deferred liability and is included as a component of “Other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information pertaining to these leases. Loan Fees: Loan fees are generally amortized using the effective interest method (or other methods which approximate the effective interest method) over the life of the related loan as a component of interest expense. Debt prepayment penalties and certain fees associated with exchanges or modifications of debt are expensed as incurred as a component of interest expense. The Company elected to early adopt the pronouncement on debt issuance costs effective December 31, 2015 and therefore, presents unamortized capitalized loan fees, excluding those related to its unsecured revolving line of credit, as direct reductions of the carrying amounts of the related debt liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized capitalized loan fees attributable to the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit are recorded in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Income Taxes: The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the taxable income the Company currently distributes to its shareholders. The Company records a benefit, based on the GAAP measurement criteria, for uncertain income tax positions if the result of a tax position meets a “more likely than not” recognition threshold. Tax returns for the calendar years 2012 through 2015 remain subject to examination by federal and various state tax jurisdictions. Segment Reporting: The Company’s chief operating decision maker, which is comprised of its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assesses and measures the operating results of the Company’s portfolio of properties based on net operating income and does not differentiate properties by geography, market, size or type. Each of the Company’s investment properties is considered a separate operating segment, as each property earns revenue and incurs expenses, individual operating results are reviewed and discrete financial information is available. However, the Company’s properties are aggregated into one reportable segment as they have similar economic characteristics, the Company provides similar services to its tenants and the Company evaluates the collective performance of its properties. 64 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Recent Accounting Pronouncements Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, the concept of extraordinary items is eliminated from GAAP and entities are no longer required to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary. However, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently is retained. The Company elected to early adopt this pronouncement effective January 1, 2015. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, companies are required to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, excluding revolving debt arrangements, as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of that debt liability on the balance sheet. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected. The Company elected to early adopt this pronouncement effective December 31, 2015. This pronouncement requires a full retrospective method of adoption and the adoption resulted in the reclassification of $15,730 of unamortized capitalized loan fees as of December 31, 2014 from “Other assets” to direct reductions of the Company’s indebtedness on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the adoption resulted in the reclassification of $141 of unamortized capitalized loan fees from “Assets associated with investment properties held for sale” to “Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net.” Unamortized capitalized loan fees attributable to the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit continue to be recorded in “Other assets” as they relate to a revolving debt arrangement. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, a company’s management is required to assess the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern every reporting period, including interim periods, for a period of one year after the date the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued) and provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 will not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, companies are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities under a revised consolidation model. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model, which modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and provides a scope exception from consolidation guidance for registered money market funds. This pronouncement allows either a full or a modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 under the modified retrospective method will not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted, the acquirer in a business combination is required to recognize any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined and is no longer required to retrospectively account for those adjustments. A company must present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2016 will not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2017, registrants will be required to disclose the following in any annual report, proxy or information statement, or registration statement that requires executive compensation disclosure: 1) the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees (excluding the chief executive officer), 2) the annual total compensation of its chief executive officer, and 3) the ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all its employees to the annual total compensation of its chief executive officer. The Company does not expect the adoption of this final rule will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2017, companies will be required to apply a five- step model in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of this revised revenue model is that a company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Lease contracts will be excluded from this revenue recognition criteria; however, the sale of real estate will be required to follow the new model. This pronouncement allows either a full or a modified retrospective method of adoption. Expanded quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding revenue recognition will be required for contracts that are subject to this guidance. The Company does not expect the adoption of 65 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements this pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements; however, it will continue to evaluate this assessment until the guidance becomes effective. (3) Acquisitions The Company closed on the following acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2015: Date Property Name January 8, 2015 Downtown Crown January 23, 2015 Merrifield Town Center January 23, 2015 Fort Evans Plaza II February 19, 2015 Cedar Park Town Center March 24, 2015 Lake Worth Towne Crossing – Parcel (a) May 4, 2015 June 10, 2015 July 31, 2015 Tysons Corner Woodinville Plaza Southlake Town Square – Outparcel (b) August 27, 2015 Coal Creek Marketplace October 27, 2015 Royal Oaks Village II – Outparcel (a) November 13, 2015 Towson Square Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Austin Dallas Washington, D.C. Seattle Dallas Seattle Houston Baltimore Property Type Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Land Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user outparcel Multi-tenant retail Single-user outparcel Multi-tenant retail Square Footage Acquisition Price 258,000 $ 162,785 84,900 228,900 179,300 — 37,700 170,800 13,800 55,900 12,300 138,200 56,500 65,000 39,057 400 31,556 35,250 8,440 17,600 6,841 39,707 1,179,800 $ 463,136 (a) The Company acquired a parcel located at its Lake Worth Towne Crossing multi-tenant retail operating property and a single-user outparcel located at its Royal Oaks Village II multi-tenant retail operating property. (b) The Company acquired a single-user outparcel located at its Southlake Town Square multi-tenant retail operating property that was subject to a ground lease with the Company (as lessor) prior to the transaction. The Company closed on the following acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2014: Date Property Name February 27, 2014 Heritage Square February 27, 2014 June 5, 2014 June 23, 2014 Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza – Fee Interest (a) MS Inland Portfolio (b) Southlake Town Square – Outparcel (c) November 20, 2014 Avondale Plaza December 30, 2014 Lakewood Towne Center – Parcel MSA Seattle Miami Various Dallas Seattle Seattle Property Type Square Footage Acquisition Price Pro Rata Acquisition Price Multi-tenant retail 53,100 $ 18,022 $ 18,022 Ground lease interest — Multi-tenant retail 1,194,800 Single-user outparcel Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant parcel 8,500 39,000 44,000 10,350 292,500 6,369 15,070 5,750 10,350 234,000 6,369 15,070 5,750 1,339,400 $ 348,061 $ 289,561 (a) The Company acquired the fee interest in an existing wholly-owned multi-tenant retail operating property located in Miami, Florida, which was previously subject to a ground lease with a third party. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company reversed a straight-line ground rent liability of $4,258, which is presented in “Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. (b) As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in MS Inland Fund, LLC (MS Inland) by acquiring its partner’s 80% ownership interest in the six multi-tenant retail properties owned by the joint venture (collectively, the MS Inland acquisitions). The Company paid total cash consideration of approximately $120,600 before transaction costs and prorations and after assumption of the joint venture’s in-place mortgage financing on those properties of $141,698. The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination achieved in stages and recognized a gain on change in control of investment properties of $24,158 as a result of remeasuring the carrying value of its 20% interest in the six acquired properties to fair value. Such gain is presented as “Gain on change in control of investment properties” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. (c) The Company acquired a single-user outparcel located at its Southlake Town Square multi-tenant retail operating property that was subject to a ground lease with the Company (as lessor) prior to the transaction. 66 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company closed on the following acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013: Date Property Name October 1, 2013 RioCan Portfolio (a) November 6, 2013 Pelham Manor Shopping Plaza November 13, 2013 Fordham Place MSA Various New York New York Property Type Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Square Footage Acquisition Price Pro Rata Acquisition Price 598,100 $ 124,783 $ 228,000 262,000 58,530 133,900 1,088,100 $ 317,213 $ 99,826 58,530 133,900 292,256 (a) As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in RC Inland L.P. (RioCan) and acquired its partner’s 80% ownership interest in five multi-tenant retail properties owned by the joint venture. The Company paid total cash consideration of approximately $45,500 before transaction costs and prorations and after assumption of its partner’s 80% interest of the joint venture’s $67,900 in-place mortgage financing on those properties. The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination achieved in stages and recognized a gain on change in control of investment properties of $5,435 as a result of remeasuring the carrying value of its 20% interest in the five acquired properties to fair value. Such gain is presented as “Gain on change in control of investment properties” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values, before prorations, the Company recorded in conjunction with the acquisitions completed during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 discussed above: Land Building and other improvements Acquired lease intangible assets (a) Acquired lease intangible liabilities (b) Mortgages payable (c) Net assets acquired (d) 2015 2014 2013 161,114 281,649 45,474 (25,101) — 463,136 $ $ 118,732 219,174 35,520 (20,578) (146,485) 206,363 $ $ 60,307 238,388 46,357 (26,525) (69,177) 249,350 $ $ (a) The weighted average amortization period for acquired lease intangible assets is 15 years, eight years and 12 years for acquisitions completed during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (b) The weighted average amortization period for acquired lease intangible liabilities is 21 years, 16 years and 23 years for acquisitions completed during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (c) Includes mortgage premium of $4,787 and $1,313 for acquisitions completed during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respctively. (d) Net assets attributable to the MS Inland and RioCan acquisitions are presented at 100%. The above acquisitions were funded using a combination of available cash on hand and proceeds from the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit. Transaction costs totaling $1,591, $2,271 and $937 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were expensed as incurred and included within “General and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income from the properties acquired that were accounted for a business combinations are $97,893, $55,303 and $6,390 in total revenues, and $18,334, $6,733 and $597 in net income attributable to common shareholders from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. These amounts do not include the total revenue and net income attributable to common shareholders from the 2015 Lake Worth Towne Crossing and 2014 Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza acquisitions as they were accounted for as asset acquisitions. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company acquired a two-property portfolio consisting of the following: • Shoppes at Hagerstown, a multi-tenant retail property located in Hagerstown, Maryland, for a gross purchase price of $27,055. The property was acquired on January 15, 2016 and contains approximately 113,200 square feet; and • Merrifield Town Center II, a property located in Falls Church, Virginia, for a gross purchase price of $45,676. The property was acquired on January 15, 2016 and contains approximately 138,000 square feet, consisting of 76,000 square feet of retail space and 62,000 square feet of storage space. 67 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company has not completed the allocation of the acquisition date fair values for the properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2015; however, it expects that the purchase price of these properties will primarily be allocated to land, building and acquired lease intangibles. Condensed Pro Forma Financial Information The results of operations of the acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, for which financial information was available, are included in the following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information as if these acquisitions had been completed as of the beginning of the year prior to the acquisition date. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is presented as if the 2016 acquisitions were completed as of January 1, 2015, the 2015 acquisitions were completed as of January 1, 2014, and the 2014 acquisitions were completed as of January 1, 2013. The results of operations associated with the 2015 acquisitions of Towson Square and outparcels at Royal Oaks Village II and Southlake Town Square and the 2014 acquisition of an outparcel at Southlake Town Square have not been adjusted in the pro forma presentation due to a lack of historical financial information. The results of operations associated with the 2015 acquisition of a parcel at Lake Worth Towne Crossing and the 2014 acquisition of the fee interest at Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza have not been adjusted in the pro forma presentation as they have been accounted for as asset acquisitions. These pro forma results are for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results. The unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is as follows: Total revenues Net income Net income attributable to common shareholders Earnings per common share – basic and diluted: Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ $ $ 612,758 125,408 115,430 0.49 236,380 $ $ $ $ 635,240 18,313 8,863 0.04 236,184 $ $ $ $ 605,708 24,964 15,514 0.07 234,134 68 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (4) Dispositions The Company closed on the following dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2015: Citizen's Property Insurance Building Single-user office Date Property Name January 20, 2015 Aon Hewitt East Campus February 27, 2015 Promenade at Red Cliff April 7, 2015 April 30, 2015 May 15, 2015 June 4, 2015 June 5, 2015 June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015 July 17, 2015 July 28, 2015 July 30, 2015 Hartford Insurance Building Rasmussen College Mountain View Plaza Massillon Commons Pine Ridge Plaza Bison Hollow The Village at Quail Springs Greensburg Commons Arvada Connection and Arvada Marketplace Traveler's Office Building August 6, 2015 Shaw's Supermarket August 24, 2015 Harvest Towne Center August 31, 2015 Trenton Crossing & McAllen Shopping Center (b) September 15, 2015 The Shops at Boardwalk September 29, 2015 Best on the Boulevard September 29, 2015 Montecito Crossing October 29, 2015 Green Valley Crossing (c) November 12, 2015 Lake Mead Crossing December 2, 2015 Golfsmith December 9, 2015 Wal-Mart – Turlock December 18, 2015 Southgate Plaza December 31, 2015 Bellevue Mall Property Type Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Development Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Development Square Footage Consideration Aggregate Proceeds, Net (a) Gain 343,000 $ 17,233 $ 16,495 $ 94,500 97,400 26,700 162,000 245,900 59,800 236,500 134,800 100,400 272,500 367,500 50,800 65,700 39,700 265,900 122,400 204,400 179,700 96,400 219,900 14,900 61,000 86,100 369,300 19,050 6,015 4,800 28,500 12,520 3,650 33,200 18,800 11,350 18,400 54,900 4,841 3,000 7,800 39,295 27,400 42,500 52,200 35,000 42,565 4,475 6,200 7,000 15,750 18,848 5,663 4,449 27,949 12,145 3,368 31,858 18,657 11,267 18,283 53,159 4,643 2,769 7,381 38,410 26,634 41,542 51,415 34,200 41,930 4,298 5,996 6,665 17,500 — 4,572 860 1,334 10,184 — 440 12,938 4,061 3,824 2,810 20,208 — — 1,217 13,760 3,146 15,932 17,928 3,904 507 1,010 3,157 — — 3,917,200 $ 516,444 $ 505,524 $ 121,792 (a) Aggregate proceeds are net of transaction costs and exclude $300 of condemnation proceeds, which did not result in any additional gain recognition. (b) The terms of the disposition of Trenton Crossing and McAllen Shopping Center were negotiated as a single transaction. (c) The development property had been held in a consolidated joint venture and was sold to an affiliate of the joint venture partner. Concurrent with the sale, the joint venture was dissolved. Approximately $528 of the gain on sale was allocated to the noncontrolling interest holder as its share of the gain. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repaid or defeased $121,605 in mortgages payable prior to or in connection with the 2015 dispositions. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company sold two multi-tenant retail operating properties aggregating 765,800 square feet for total consideration of $92,500, including The Gateway which was disposed of through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of the Company’s mortgage obligation. 69 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company closed on the following dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2014: Date Property Name Property Type Square Footage Consideration Aggregate Proceeds, Net (a) Gain Continuing Operations: April 1, 2014 Midtown Center Multi-tenant retail 408,500 $ 47,150 $ 46,043 $ — May 16, 2014 Beachway Plaza & Cornerstone Plaza (b) August 1, 2014 Battle Ridge Pavilion August 15, 2014 Stanley Works/Mac Tools August 15, 2014 Fisher Scientific August 19, 2014 Boston Commons August 19, 2014 Greenwich Center August 26, 2014 Crossroads Plaza CVS August 27, 2014 Four Peaks Plaza October 2, 2014 Gloucester Town Center October 20, 2014 Various (c) October 29, 2014 October 31, 2014 Shoppes at Stroud The Market at Clifty Crossing November 5, 2014 Crockett Square November 24, 2014 Mission Crossing (d) December 4, 2014 Plaza at Riverlakes December 16, 2014 Diebold Warehouse December 22, 2014 Newburgh Crossing Discontinued Operations: Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user industrial Multi-tenant retail 189,600 103,500 72,500 114,700 103,400 182,600 16,000 140,400 107,200 65,400 136,400 175,900 107,100 178,200 102,800 158,700 62,900 24,450 14,100 10,350 14,000 9,820 22,700 7,650 9,900 10,350 24,400 26,850 19,150 9,750 24,250 17,350 11,500 10,000 23,584 13,722 10,184 13,715 9,586 21,977 7,411 9,381 9,722 23,846 26,466 18,883 9,565 23,545 17,021 10,752 9,770 819 1,327 1,375 3,732 — 5,871 2,863 — — 6,362 485 5,292 822 5,936 4,127 2,879 — 2,425,800 313,720 305,173 41,890 March 11, 2014 Riverpark Phase IIA Single-user retail 64,300 9,269 9,204 655 2,490,100 $ 322,989 $ 314,377 $ 42,545 (a) Aggregate proceeds are net of transaction costs and exclude $324 of condemnation proceeds, which did not result in any additional gain recognition. (b) The terms of the disposition of Beachway Plaza and Cornerstone Plaza were negotiated as a single transaction. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $527 during the second quarter of 2014 and an additional gain of $292 during the fourth quarter of 2014 that was deferred at disposition. (c) The Company sold a portfolio of five drug stores located in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Alabama in a single transaction. (d) The disposition of Mission Crossing was executed in two separate transactions for a total sales price of $24,250. The 163,400 square foot multi-tenant retail property, excluding the Walgreens outparcel, was sold for $17,250 to a third party and the 14,800 square foot Walgreens outparcel was sold for $7,000 to a different third party. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company also received consideration of $700, net proceeds of $699 and recorded a gain of $306 from the sale of an outparcel at one of its properties. The aggregate proceeds, net of closing costs, from the property sales and additional transactions totaled $315,400 with aggregate gains of $42,851. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repaid or defeased $128,947 in mortgages payable prior to or in connection with the 2014 dispositions. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company sold 20 properties. The dispositions and certain additional transactions, including earnouts, pad sales and condemnations, resulted in aggregate proceeds, net of transaction costs, of $326,766 with aggregate gains of $47,085. As of December 31, 2015, no properties qualified for held for sale accounting treatment. Promenade at Red Cliff and Aon Hewitt East Campus, both of which were sold during the year ended December 31, 2015, were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. 70 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table presents the assets and liabilities associated with the investment properties classified as held for sale: Assets Land, building and other improvements Accumulated depreciation Net investment properties Other assets Assets associated with investment properties held for sale Liabilities Mortgage payable, net Other liabilities Liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale, net December 31, 2014 $ $ $ $ 36,020 (5,358) 30,662 2,837 33,499 7,934 128 8,062 There was no activity during the year ended December 31, 2015 related to discontinued operations. The results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for the investment properties accounted for as discontinued operations, which consists of investment properties sold or classified as held for sale on or prior to December 31, 2013, including Riverpark Phase IIA, are presented in the table below. Revenues Rental income Tenant recovery income Other property income Total revenues Expenses Property operating expenses Real estate taxes Depreciation and amortization Provision for impairment of investment properties Gain on extinguishment of debt Gain on extinguishment of other liabilities Interest expense Other income, net Total expenses Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 $ $ (123) 144 23 44 24,448 5,142 7,571 37,161 121 3 — — — — 68 — 192 4,802 5,664 11,075 32,547 (26,331) (3,511) 3,632 (113) 27,765 (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net $ (148) $ 9,396 (5) Equity Compensation Plans The Company’s 2014 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan, subject to certain conditions, authorizes the issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other similar awards as well as cash-based awards to the Company’s employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors in connection with compensation and incentive arrangements that may be established by the Company’s board of directors or executive management. 71 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested restricted shares as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: Balance as of January 1, 2013 Shares granted (a) Shares vested Shares forfeited Balance as of December 31, 2013 Shares granted (a) Shares vested Shares forfeited Balance as of December 31, 2014 Shares granted (a) Shares vested Shares forfeited Balance as of December 31, 2015 (b) Unvested Restricted Shares 46 116 (9) (1) 152 303 (58) (1) 396 801 (405) (4) 788 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Restricted Share $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 17.30 14.27 15.53 15.61 15.11 13.89 14.50 15.61 14.26 15.82 14.89 16.01 15.52 (a) Shares granted in 2013, 2014 and 2015 vest over periods ranging from 0.6 to five years, one to three years and 0.4 to 3.4 years, respectively, in accordance with the terms of applicable award documents. (b) As of December 31, 2015, total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted shares was $4,465, which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average term of 1.4 years. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, performance restricted stock units (RSUs) were granted for the first time to the Company’s executives. In 2018, following the performance period which concludes on December 31, 2017, one-third of the RSUs will convert into shares of common stock and two-thirds will convert into restricted shares with a one year vesting term. As long as the minimum hurdle is achieved and the executive remains employed during the performance period, the RSUs will convert into shares of common stock and restricted shares at a conversion rate of between 50% and 200% based upon the Company’s Total Shareholder Return as compared to that of the other companies within the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) Shopping Center Index for 2015 through 2017. If an executive terminates employment during the performance period by reason of a qualified termination, as defined in the agreement, only a prorated portion of his outstanding RSUs will be eligible for conversion based upon the period in which the executive was employed during the performance period. If an executive terminates for any reason other than a qualified termination during the performance period, he would forfeit his outstanding RSUs. In 2018, additional shares of common stock will also be issued in an amount equal to the accumulated value of the dividends that would have been paid during the performance period on the shares of common stock and restricted shares issued at the end of the performance period divided by the then-current market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company calculated the grant date fair value per unit using a Monte Carlo simulation based on the probability of satisfying the market performance hurdles over the remainder of the performance period. Assumptions include a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.80%, the Company’s historical common stock performance relative to the other companies within the NAREIT Shopping Center Index and the Company’s weighted average common stock dividend yield of 4.26%. 72 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested RSUs as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015: RSUs eligible for future conversion as of January 1, 2015 RSUs granted RSUs ineligible for conversion RSUs eligible for future conversion as of December 31, 2015 (a) Unvested RSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per RSU — 180 (6) 174 $ $ $ $ — 14.19 14.10 14.20 (a) As of December 31, 2015, total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs was $1,825, which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average term of 2.7 years. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded compensation expense of $10,755, $3,417 and $455, respectively, related to unvested restricted shares and RSUs. Included within compensation expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015 is compensation expense of $2,159 related to the accelerated vesting of 194 restricted shares in conjunction with the departure of the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and former Executive Vice President and President of Property Management. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded $113 of additional compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of nine restricted shares in conjunction with the resignation of its former Chief Accounting Officer. The total fair value of restricted shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $6,188, $840 and $139, respectively. Prior to 2013, non-employee directors had been granted options to acquire shares under the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2015, options to purchase 84 shares of common stock had been granted, of which options to purchase three shares had been exercised, options to purchase seven shares had expired and options to purchase 21 shares had been forfeited. As of December 31, 2014, options to purchase 84 shares of common stock had been granted, of which options to purchase three shares had been exercised, options to purchase six shares had expired and options to purchase 11 shares had been forfeited. The Company did not grant any options in 2013, 2014 or 2015. Compensation expense of $0, $3 and $24 related to stock options was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (6) Leases The majority of revenues from the Company’s properties consist of rents received under long-term operating leases. In addition to base rent paid monthly in advance, some leases provide for the reimbursement of the tenant’s pro rata share of certain operating expenses incurred by the landlord including real estate taxes, special assessments, insurance, utilities, common area maintenance, management fees and certain capital repairs, subject to the terms of the respective lease. Certain other tenants are subject to net leases which provide that the tenant is responsible for fixed base rent, as well as all costs and expenses associated with occupancy. Under net leases, where all expenses are paid directly by the tenant rather than the landlord, such expenses are not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Under leases where all expenses are paid by the landlord, subject to reimbursement by the tenant, the expenses are included in “Property operating expenses” or “Real estate taxes” and reimbursements are included in “Tenant recovery income” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. In certain municipalities, the Company is required to remit sales taxes to governmental authorities based upon the rental income received from properties in those regions. These taxes are reimbursed by the tenant to the Company depending upon the terms of the applicable tenant lease. The presentation of the remittance and reimbursement of these taxes is on a gross basis with sales tax expenses included in “Property operating expenses” and sales tax reimbursements included in “Other property income” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Such taxes remitted to governmental authorities, which are reimbursed by tenants, exclusive of amounts attributable to discontinued operations, were $2,071, $1,985 and $1,791 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 73 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Minimum lease payments to be received under operating leases, excluding payments under master lease agreements, additional percentage rent based on tenants’ sales volume and tenant reimbursements of certain operating expenses and assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights, are as follows: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Minimum Lease Payments $ $ 441,553 393,790 347,324 282,837 220,910 824,493 2,510,907 The remaining lease terms range from less than one year to more than 67 years. Many of the leases at the Company’s retail properties contain provisions that condition a tenant’s obligation to remain open, the amount of rent payable by the tenant or potentially the tenant’s obligation to remain in the lease, upon certain factors, including: (i) the presence and continued operation of a certain anchor tenant or tenants, (ii) minimum occupancy levels at the applicable property or (iii) tenant sales amounts. If such a provision is triggered by a failure of any of these or other applicable conditions, a tenant could have the right to cease operations at the applicable property, have its rent reduced or terminate its lease early. The Company does not expect that such provisions will have a material impact on its future operating results. The Company leases land under non-cancellable operating leases at certain of its properties expiring in various years from 2023 to 2090, exclusive of any available option periods. In addition, the Company leases office space for certain management offices and its corporate office. The following table summarizes rent expense included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, including straight-line rent expense. Ground lease rent expense (a) Office rent expense (b) Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ 11,461 1,246 $ $ 11,676 1,210 $ $ 9,758 962 (a) Included in “Property operating expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Excludes amounts attributable to discontinued operations, but includes straight-line ground rent expense of $3,722, $3,889 and $3,486 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. (b) Office rent expense related to property management operations is included in “Property operating expenses” and office rent expense related to corporate office operations is included in “General and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Minimum future rental obligations to be paid under the ground and office leases, including fixed rental increases, are as follows: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Minimum Lease Obligations $ $ 8,458 8,396 8,448 8,776 9,174 510,790 554,042 74 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (7) Mortgages Payable The following table summarizes the Company’s mortgages payable: December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Aggregate Principal Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate Weighted Average Years to Maturity Aggregate Principal Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate Weighted Average Years to Maturity Fixed rate mortgages payable (a) Variable rate construction loan (b) Mortgages payable Premium, net of accumulated amortization Discount, net of accumulated amortization Capitalized loan fees, net of accumulated amortization $ 1,128,505 — 1,128,505 1,865 (1) (7,233) Mortgages payable, net $ 1,123,136 6.08% —% 6.08% 3.9 — 3.9 $ 1,616,063 14,900 1,630,963 6.03% 2.44% 5.99% 4.0 0.8 3.9 3,972 (470) (10,736) $ 1,623,729 (a) Includes $7,910 and $8,124 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and excludes mortgages payable of $8,075 associated with one investment property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. The fixed rate mortgages had interest rates ranging from 3.35% to 8.00% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. (b) The variable rate construction loan bore interest at a floating rate of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.25%. On October 29, 2015, the construction loan was repaid in conjunction with the disposition of Green Valley Crossing. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repaid or defeased mortgages payable in the total amount of $495,456 (excluding scheduled principal payments of $16,126 related to amortizing loans). The loans repaid or defeased during the year ended December 31, 2015 had a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.82%. In August 2015, the servicing of the Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security (CMBS) loan encumbering The Gateway was transferred to the special servicer at the request of the Company. This servicing transfer occurred notwithstanding the fact that the CMBS loan was performing. In 2014, this property was impaired below its debt balance, which was $94,463 as of December 31, 2015. The loan was non-recourse to the Company, except for customary non-recourse carve-outs. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company disposed of The Gateway through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of its mortgage obligation. The majority of the Company’s mortgages payable require monthly payments of principal and interest, as well as reserves for real estate taxes and certain other costs. The Company’s properties and the related tenant leases are pledged as collateral for its mortgages payable. Although the mortgage loans obtained by the Company are generally non-recourse, occasionally, the Company may guarantee all or a portion of the debt on a full-recourse basis. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had guaranteed $1,978 of its outstanding mortgage loans related to one mortgage loan with a maturity date of September 30, 2016 (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements). At times, the Company has borrowed funds financed as part of a cross-collateralized package, with cross-default provisions, in order to enhance the financial benefits of a transaction. In those circumstances, one or more of the Company’s properties may secure the debt of another of the Company’s properties. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a pool of mortgages with a principal balance of $395,402 that was cross-collateralized by the 48 properties in its IW JV 2009, LLC portfolio. 75 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Debt Maturities The following table shows the scheduled maturities and principal amortization of the Company’s indebtedness as of December 31, 2015, for each of the next five years and thereafter and the weighted average interest rates by year. The table does not reflect the impact of any 2016 debt activity, such as the Company’s 2016 unsecured credit facility. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further details. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Debt: Fixed rate debt: Mortgages payable (a) $ 48,876 $ 319,633 $ 10,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 302,324 $ 1,128,505 Unsecured credit facility – fixed rate portion of term loan (b) Unsecured notes payable (c) — — — — 300,000 — — — — — Total fixed rate debt 48,876 319,633 310,801 443,447 3,424 — 500,000 802,324 300,000 500,000 1,928,505 Variable rate debt: Unsecured credit facility — 100,000 150,000 — — — 250,000 Total debt (d) $ 48,876 $ 419,633 $ 460,801 $ 443,447 $ 3,424 $ 802,324 $ 2,178,505 Weighted average interest rate on debt: Fixed rate debt Variable rate debt (e) Total 4.92% — 4.92% 5.52% 1.93% 4.66% 2.16% 1.88% 2.07% 7.50% — 7.50% 4.80% — 4.80% 4.42% — 4.42% 4.96% 1.90% 4.61% (a) Includes $7,910 of variable rate mortgage debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate as of December 31, 2015. Excludes mortgage premium of $1,865 and discount of $(1), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (b) $300,000 of LIBOR-based variable rate debt has been swapped to a fixed rate through February 2016. The swap effectively converts one- month floating rate LIBOR to a fixed rate of 0.53875% over the term of the swap. (c) Excludes discount of $(1,090), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015. (d) Total debt excludes capitalized loan fees of $(13,041), net of accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2015 which are included as a reduction to the respective debt balances. The weighted average years to maturity of consolidated indebtedness was 4.5 years as of December 31, 2015. (e) Represents interest rates as of December 31, 2015. The Company plans on addressing its debt maturities through a combination of proceeds from asset dispositions, capital markets transactions and its unsecured revolving line of credit. (8) Unsecured Notes Payable On March 12, 2015, the Company completed a public offering of $250,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 4.00% senior unsecured notes due 2025 (4.00% notes). The 4.00% notes were priced at 99.526% of the principal amount to yield 4.058% to maturity. In addition, on June 30, 2014, the Company completed a private placement of $250,000 of unsecured notes, consisting of $100,000 of 4.12% Series A senior notes due 2021 and $150,000 of 4.58% Series B senior notes due 2024 (collectively, Series A and B notes). The proceeds from the 4.00% notes and the Series A and B notes were used to repay a portion of the Company’s unsecured revolving line of credit. 76 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes the Company’s unsecured notes payable: Unsecured Notes Payable Senior notes – 4.12% Series A due 2021 Senior notes – 4.58% Series B due 2024 Senior notes – 4.00% due 2025 Maturity Date June 30, 2021 $ June 30, 2024 March 15, 2025 Discount, net of accumulated amortization Capitalized loan fees, net of accumulated amortization December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Principal Balance Interest Rate/ Weighted Average Interest Rate Principal Balance Interest Rate/ Weighted Average Interest Rate 100,000 150,000 250,000 500,000 (1,090) (3,334) 4.12% $ 4.58% 4.00% 4.20% 100,000 150,000 — 250,000 — (1,459) 4.12% 4.58% —% 4.40% Total $ 495,576 $ 248,541 The indenture, as supplemented, governing the 4.00% notes (the Indenture) contains customary covenants and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, the Company is subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum secured and total leverage ratios; (ii) a debt service coverage ratio; and (iii) maintenance of an unencumbered assets to unsecured debt ratio. The note purchase agreement governing the Series A and B notes contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the note purchase agreement, the Company is subject to various financial covenants, some of which are based upon the financial covenants in effect in the Company’s primary credit facility, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios; (ii) minimum interest coverage and unencumbered interest coverage ratios; and (iii) a minimum consolidated net worth. As of December 31, 2015, management believes the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Indenture and the note purchase agreement. (9) Unsecured Credit Facility On May 13, 2013, the Company entered into its third amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by KeyBank National Association serving as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serving as syndication agent to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,000,000. As of December 31, 2015, the unsecured credit facility consisted of a $550,000 unsecured revolving line of credit and a $450,000 unsecured term loan (collectively, the Unsecured Credit Facility). The Unsecured Credit Facility had a $450,000 accordion option that allowed the Company, at its election, to increase the total credit facility up to $1,450,000, subject to (i) customary fees and conditions including, but not limited to, the absence of an event of default as defined in the agreement and (ii) the Company’s ability to obtain additional lender commitments. The following table summarizes the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility: December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Unsecured Credit Facility Maturity Date Balance Term loan – fixed rate portion (a) Term loan – variable rate portion Subtotal Capitalized loan fees, net of accumulated amortization Term loan, net May 11, 2018 $ May 11, 2018 Revolving line of credit – variable rate (b) May 12, 2017 (c) Total unsecured credit facility, net $ 300,000 150,000 450,000 (2,474) 447,526 100,000 547,526 Interest Rate/ Weighted Average Interest Rate Interest Rate/ Weighted Average Interest Rate Balance 1.99% $ 1.88% 1.93% 300,000 150,000 450,000 (3,535) 446,465 — 1.95% $ 446,465 1.99% 1.62% 1.67% 1.87% (a) $300,000 of the term loan has been swapped to a fixed rate of 0.53875% plus a credit spread based on a leverage grid ranging from 1.45% to 2.00% through February 2016. The applicable credit spread was 1.45% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. (b) Excludes capitalized loan fees, which are included in “Other assets, net” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. (c) The Company had a one year extension option on the unsecured revolving line of credit, which it could have exercised as long as it was in compliance with the terms of the unsecured credit agreement and it paid an extension fee equal to 0.15% of the commitment amount being extended. 77 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements As of December 31, 2015, the Unsecured Credit Facility was priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. The Company received investment grade credit ratings from two rating agencies in 2014 and in accordance with the unsecured credit agreement, the Company may elect to convert to an investment grade pricing grid. As of December 31, 2015, making such an election would have resulted in a higher interest rate and, as such, the Company has not made the election to convert to an investment grade pricing grid. The following table summarizes the leverage-based and ratings-based credit spreads and additional pricing terms of the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility as of December 31, 2015: Unsecured Credit Facility Term loan Revolving line of credit Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing Credit Spread 1.45% – 2.00% 1.50% – 2.05% Unused Fee N/A 0.25% – 0.30% Credit Spread 1.05% – 2.05% 0.90% – 1.70% Facility Fee N/A 0.15% – 0.35% The unsecured credit agreement contained customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the unsecured credit agreement, the Company was subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios; (ii) minimum fixed charge and unencumbered interest coverage ratios; and (iii) a minimum consolidated net worth. As of December 31, 2015, management believes the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants and default provisions under the unsecured credit agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company entered into its fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by KeyBank National Association serving as administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serving as syndication agent to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. The Company’s 2016 unsecured credit facility consists of a $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit, a $200,000 unsecured term loan and a $250,000 unsecured term loan (collectively, the Company’s 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility) and will be priced on a leverage grid at a rate of LIBOR plus a credit spread. The following table summarizes the key terms of the Company’s 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility: 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility $200,000 unsecured term loan $250,000 unsecured term loan $750,000 unsecured revolving line of credit 1/5/2021 1/5/2020 Maturity Date Extension Option Extension Fee Credit Spread Unused Fee Credit Spread Facility Fee Leverage-Based Pricing Ratings-Based Pricing 5/11/2018 2 one year 0.15% 1.45% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.30% - 2.20% N/A N/A 1.05% - 2.05% 0.90% - 1.75% N/A N/A 2 six month 0.075% 1.35% - 2.25% 0.15% - 0.25% 0.85% - 1.55% 0.125% - 0.30% The Company’s 2016 Unsecured Credit Facility has a $400,000 accordion option that allows the Company, at its election, to increase the total credit facility up to $1,600,000, subject to (i) customary fees and conditions including, but not limited to, the absence of an event of default as defined in the agreement and (ii) the Company’s ability to obtain additional lender commitments. The fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, and events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement, the Company is subject to various financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain the following: (i) maximum unencumbered, secured and consolidated leverage ratios; and (ii) minimum fixed charge and unencumbered interest coverage ratios. (10) Derivatives The Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to manage its exposure to interest rate movements and add stability to interest expense. To accomplish this objective, the Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments over the life of the agreement without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The Company utilizes two interest rate swaps to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable rate debt. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” and is reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable rate debt. Over the next 12 months, the Company estimates that an additional $85 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. 78 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk: Interest Rate Derivatives Interest rate swaps Number of Instruments Notional December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 2 2 $ 307,910 $ 308,124 The table below presents the estimated fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, which are presented within “Other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The valuation techniques utilized are described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements. Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: Interest rate swaps $ 85 $ 562 Fair Value December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 The following table presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income: Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships Amount of Loss Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion) 2015 2014 Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) into Income (Effective Portion) Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized In Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) Amount of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) 2015 2014 Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) 2015 2014 Interest rate swaps $ 643 $ 981 Interest expense $ 1,095 $ 1,182 Other income, net $ (25) $ 12 Credit-risk-related Contingent Features The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision whereby if the Company defaults on the related indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its corresponding derivative obligation. The Company’s agreements with each of its derivative counterparties also contain a provision whereby if the Company consolidates with, merges with or into, or transfers all or substantially all of its assets to another entity and the creditworthiness of the resulting, surviving or transferee entity is materially weaker than the Company’s, the counterparty has the right to terminate the derivative obligations. As of December 31, 2015, the termination value of derivatives in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for non-performance risk, which the Company has deemed not significant, was $96. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of December 31, 2015, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $96. (11) Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures The Company did not have any investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. On June 5, 2014, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in MS Inland, an unconsolidated joint venture formed with a large state pension fund, through the acquisition of the six properties owned by the joint venture. The Company was the managing member of the venture and earned fees for providing property management and leasing services. The Company had the ability to exercise significant influence, but did not have financial or operating control over the joint venture, and as a result, the Company accounted for its investment pursuant to the equity method of accounting. Through December 1, 2014, Oak Property & Casualty LLC (the Captive) was an insurance association owned by the Company and three other unaffiliated parties that was formed to insure/reimburse the members’ deductible obligations for property and general liability insurance claims subject to certain limitations. The Captive was determined to be a VIE, but because the Company did not hold the power to most significantly impact the Captive’s performance, the Company was not considered the primary 79 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beneficiary. Accordingly, the Company’s investment in the Captive was accounted for pursuant to the equity method of accounting. The Company’s risk of loss was limited to its investment and it was not required to fund additional capital to the Captive. Effective December 1, 2014, the Company terminated its participation in the Captive and established a new wholly-owned captive insurance company. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further details. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s net equity investment in each unconsolidated joint venture was reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and its share of net income or loss from each unconsolidated joint venture was reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Distributions that were related to income from operations were included as operating activities and distributions that were related to capital transactions were included as investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. Combined condensed financial information of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (at 100%) for the periods attributable to the Company’s ownership is summarized as follows: RioCan (a) Hampton (b) Other Joint Ventures (c) Combined Condensed Total 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 Year ended December 31, $ $ — $ 36,758 — — 36,758 — — $ — — — $ — — $ 11,853 6,679 18,532 $ 27,841 8,174 36,015 $ 11,853 6,679 18,532 Revenues Property related income Other income Total revenues Expenses Property operating expenses Real estate taxes Depreciation and amortization General and administrative expenses Interest expense, net Other (income) expense, net Total expenses Income (loss) from continuing operations (Loss) income from discontinued operations (d) Gain on sales of investment properties – discontinued operations 64,599 8,174 72,773 8,523 11,454 31,565 917 12,404 1,576 66,439 — — — — — — — — — — 5,001 6,187 21,964 457 7,033 (4,436) 36,206 552 (1,026) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6 (1,758) (13) (1,765) 1,660 2,339 3,948 268 3,028 11,921 23,164 3,522 5,267 9,601 454 7,129 6,025 31,998 1,660 2,339 3,948 268 3,028 11,921 23,164 1,765 (4,632) 4,017 (4,632) 6,334 (117) 1,019 2,667 — — 52 — — — $ (4,632) $ 4,069 $ (4,632) $ (1,091) 1,019 6,262 Net (loss) income $ — $ (474) $ — $ (a) On October 1, 2013, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in RioCan. (b) During 2013, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in Hampton. (c) On June 5, 2014, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in MS Inland. In addition, effective December 1, 2014, the Company terminated its investment in the Captive. (d) Included within “(Loss) income from discontinued operations” are the following: property-level operating results attributable to the five properties the Company acquired from its RioCan unconsolidated joint venture on October 1, 2013; all property-level operating results attributable to the Hampton unconsolidated joint venture; and the property-level operating results recognized by the Company’s MS Inland unconsolidated joint venture related to a property sold to the Company’s RioCan unconsolidated joint venture. The property-level operating results for the portfolio of properties held by the Company’s MS Inland unconsolidated joint venture are presented within “Income (loss) from continuing operations” above given that the Company’s acquisition of its partner’s 80% interest in all of the properties was a transaction among partners. The property-level operating results of the eight RioCan properties in which the Company’s partner acquired the Company’s 20% interest are presented within “Income (loss) from continuing operations” above given the continuity of the controlling financial interest before and after the dissolution transaction. 80 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Profits, Losses and Capital Activity The following table summarizes the Company’s share of net income (loss) as well as net cash distributions from (contributions to) each unconsolidated joint venture: The Company’s Share of Net Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, Net Cash Distributions from / (Contributions to) Joint Ventures for the Years Ended December 31, Fees Earned by the Company for the Years Ended December 31, Joint Venture 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 MS Inland (a) Hampton (b) RioCan (c) Captive (d) $ $ 241 — — (2,444) (2,203) $ $ 661 2,576 (176) (2,589) 472 $ $ 1,360 — — (25) 1,335 $ $ 2,369 855 (2,394) (2,503) (1,673) $ $ 338 — — — 338 $ $ 859 1 1,648 — 2,508 (a) On June 5, 2014, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in MS Inland. (b) During the year ended December 31, 2013, Hampton determined that the carrying value of one of its assets was not recoverable and, accordingly, recorded a property level impairment charge in the amount of $298, of which the Company’s share was $286. The joint venture’s estimate of fair value relating to this impairment assessment was based upon a bona fide purchase offer. During 2013, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in Hampton. (c) On October 1, 2013, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in RioCan. (d) Effective December 1, 2014, the Company terminated its participation in the Captive. In addition to the Company’s share of net income (loss) for each unconsolidated joint venture, amortization of basis differences is recorded within “Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income. Such basis differences resulted from the differences between the Company’s net book values based on historical cost and the fair values of investment properties contributed to its unconsolidated joint ventures and are amortized over the depreciable lives of the joint ventures’ real estate assets and liabilities. The Company recorded amortization of $115 and $116, which was accretive to net income, related to these differences during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company did not have any unconsolidated joint ventures as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. When the Company holds investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, they are reviewed for potential impairment, in addition to impairment evaluations of the individual assets underlying the investments, each reporting period or whenever events or changes in circumstances warrant such an evaluation. To determine whether impairment, if any, is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until its carrying value is fully recovered. As a result of such evaluations, impairment charges of $1,834 were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013 to write down the carrying value of the Company’s investment in Hampton. The Company’s Hampton joint venture arrangement was dissolved during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company did not record any impairment charges to its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the year ended December 31, 2014. 81 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Acquisitions and Dispositions On June 5, 2014, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in MS Inland by acquiring its partner’s 80% ownership interest in the six properties owned by the joint venture (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). The six properties had, at acquisition, a combined fair value of $292,500, with the Company’s partner’s interest valued at $234,000. The Company paid total cash consideration of approximately $120,600 before transaction costs and prorations and after assumption of the joint venture’s in-place mortgage financing on those properties of $141,698 at a weighted average interest rate of 4.79%. The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination achieved in stages and recognized a gain on change in control of investment properties of $24,158 as a result of remeasuring the carrying value of its 20% interest in the six acquired properties to fair value. The following table summarizes the calculation of the gain on change in control of investment properties recognized in conjunction with the transaction discussed above: Fair value of the net assets acquired at 100% Fair value of the net assets acquired at 20% Less: Carrying value of the Company’s previous investment in the six properties acquired on June 5, 2014 Gain on change in control of investment properties $ $ $ 150,802 30,160 6,002 24,158 On October 1, 2013, the Company dissolved its joint venture arrangement with its partner in RioCan as follows: • The Company acquired its partner’s 80% ownership interest in five properties owned by the joint venture. The five properties had, at acquisition, a combined fair value of approximately $124,800, with the Company’s partner’s interest valued at approximately $99,900. The Company paid total cash consideration of approximately $45,500 before transaction costs and prorations and after assumption of the joint venture’s in-place mortgage financing on those properties of approximately $67,900 at a weighted average interest rate of 4.8%. The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination achieved in stages and recognized a gain on change in control of investment properties of $5,435 as a result of remeasuring the carrying value of its 20% interest in the five acquired properties to fair value. The following table summarizes the calculation of the gain on change in control of investment properties recognized in conjunction with the transaction discussed above: Fair value of the net assets acquired at 100% Fair value of the net assets acquired at 20% Less: Carrying value of the Company’s previous investment in the five properties acquired on October 1, 2013 Gain on change in control of investment properties $ $ $ 56,919 11,384 5,949 5,435 • The Company sold to its partner its 20% ownership interest in the remaining eight properties owned by the joint venture. The properties had, at disposition, a combined fair value of approximately $477,500, with the Company’s 20% interest valued at approximately $95,500. The Company received cash consideration of approximately $53,700 before transaction costs and prorations and after its partner assumed the joint venture’s in-place mortgage financing on those properties of approximately $209,200 at a weighted average interest rate of 3.7%. The Company recognized a $17,499 gain on sale of its interest in RioCan as a result of the transaction upon meeting all applicable sales criteria. The following table summarizes the calculation of the gain on sale of joint venture interest recognized in conjunction with the transaction discussed above: Investment in RioCan at September 30, 2013 Less: Carrying value of the Company’s previous investment in the five properties acquired on October 1, 2013 Pre-disposition investment in RioCan Net consideration received at close for the Company’s interest in RioCan Less: Pre-disposition investment in RioCan Gain on sale of joint venture interest $ $ $ $ 41,523 5,949 35,574 53,073 35,574 17,499 In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2013, Hampton sold the two remaining properties in its portfolio. Such transactions aggregated a combined sales price of $13,300, resulting in a gain on sale of $1,019 on one of the properties. Proceeds from the 82 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements sales were used to pay down the entire $12,631 balance of the joint venture’s outstanding debt. As of December 31, 2013, no properties remained in the Hampton joint venture and the venture had been dissolved. (12) Equity On March 7, 2013, the Company established an at-the-market (ATM) equity program under which it sold 5,547 shares of its Class A common stock during the year ended December 31, 2013. The shares were issued at a weighted average price per share of $15.29 for proceeds of $83,527, net of commissions and offering costs. No shares were issued during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the 2013 ATM equity program expired in November 2015. On December 21, 2015, the Company established a new ATM equity program under which it may issue and sell shares of its Class A common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000, from time to time. Actual sales may depend on a variety of factors, including, among others, market conditions and the trading price of the Company’s Class A common stock. Any net proceeds are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include the funding of acquisitions and redevelopment activities and the repayment of debt, including the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had Class A common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000 remaining available for sale under its ATM equity program. On December 15, 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, up to a maximum of $250,000 of shares of its Class A common stock. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price in absolute terms and in relation to the value of the Company’s assets, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. The common stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had not repurchased any shares under this program. (13) Earnings per Share The following table summarizes the components used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS): Numerator: Income (loss) from continuing operations Gain on sales of investment properties Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interest Preferred stock dividends Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders Income from discontinued operations Net income attributable to common shareholders Distributions paid on unvested restricted shares Net income attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares Denominator: Denominator for earnings (loss) per common share – basic: Weighted average number of common shares outstanding Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options RSUs Denominator for earnings (loss) per common share – diluted: Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 $ $ 3,832 121,792 (528) (9,450) 115,646 — 115,646 (481) 597 42,196 — (9,450) 33,343 507 33,850 (225) $ (42,855) 5,806 — (9,450) (46,499) 50,675 4,176 (59) $ 115,165 $ 33,625 $ 4,117 236,380 (a) 236,184 (b) 234,134 (c) 2 (d) — (e) 3 (d) — — (d) — 236,382 236,187 234,134 (a) Excludes 788 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which equate to 768 shares on a weighted average basis for the year ended December 31, 2015. These shares will continue to be excluded from the computation of basic EPS until contingencies are resolved and the shares are released. 83 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (b) Excludes 396 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which equate to 364 shares on a weighted average basis for the year ended December 31, 2014. These shares were excluded from the computation of basic EPS as the contingencies remained and the shares had not been released as of the end of the reporting period. (c) Excludes 152 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which equate to 106 shares on a weighted average basis for the year ended December 31, 2013. These shares were excluded from the computation of basic EPS as the contingencies remained and the shares had not been released as of the end of the reporting period. (d) There were outstanding options to purchase 53, 64 and 78 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, at a weighted average exercise price of $19.39, $19.32 and $19.10, respectively. Of these totals, outstanding options to purchase 45, 54 and 78 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, at a weighted average exercise price of $20.74, $20.72 and $19.10, respectively, have been excluded from the common shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share as including them would be anti-dilutive. (e) There were 174 RSUs eligible for future conversion following the performance period as of December 31, 2015 (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements). These contingently issuable shares are included in diluted EPS based on the weighted average number of shares that would be outstanding during the period, if any, assuming the end of the reporting period was the end of the contingency period. Assuming December 31, 2015 was the end of the contingency period, none of these contingently issuable shares would be outstanding. (14) Income Taxes The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to annually distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. The Company intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain its REIT status. As a REIT, the Company is entitled to a deduction for some or all of the distributions it pays to shareholders. Accordingly, the Company is generally subject to U.S. federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to its shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a REIT until the fifth subsequent taxable year. Notwithstanding the Company’s qualification as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income or properties. In addition, the Company’s consolidated financial statements include the operations of one wholly-owned subsidiary that has jointly elected to be treated as a TRS and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate tax rates. The Company did not record any income tax expense related to the TRS for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company recorded $189 of income tax expense related to the TRS for the year ended December 31, 2013. As a REIT, the Company may also be subject to certain U.S. federal excise taxes if it engages in certain types of transactions. Deferred income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted rates in effect for the year in which these temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, the magnitude and timing of future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies. The Company believes that it is not more likely than not that a portion of its net deferred tax asset will be realized in future periods and therefore, has recorded a valuation allowance for a portion of the balance, resulting in no effect on the consolidated financial statements. 84 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: Deferred tax assets: Basis difference in properties Capital loss carryforward Net operating loss carryforward Other Gross deferred tax assets Less: valuation allowance Total deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities: Other Net deferred tax assets 2015 2014 $ $ $ 1,109 9,885 12,543 81 23,618 (23,618) — — — $ 14,211 3,225 2,995 140 20,571 (20,355) 216 (216) — The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities result from the activities of the TRS. As of December 31, 2015, the TRS had a capital loss carryforward and a federal net operating loss carryforward of $24,567 and $31,171, respectively, which if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2019 and 2031, respectively. Differences between net income from the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income and the Company’s taxable income primarily relate to impairment charges recorded on investment properties and the timing of both revenue recognition and investment property depreciation and amortization. The following table reconciles the Company’s net income to REIT taxable income before the dividends paid deduction for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: Net income attributable to the Company Book/tax differences REIT taxable income subject to 90% dividend requirement 2015 2014 2013 $ $ 125,096 2,344 127,440 $ $ 43,300 71,910 115,210 $ $ 13,626 60,098 73,724 The Company’s dividends paid deduction for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is summarized below: Cash distributions paid Less: non-dividend distributions Total dividends paid deduction attributable to earnings and profits 2015 2014 2013 $ $ 166,064 (38,624) 127,440 $ $ 166,025 (50,815) 115,210 $ $ 164,391 (90,667) 73,724 A summary of the tax characterization of the distributions paid per share to shareholders of the Company’s preferred stock and common stock for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 follows: Preferred stock Ordinary dividends Non-dividend distributions Total distributions per share Common stock Ordinary dividends Non-dividend distributions Total distributions per share 2015 2014 2013 $ $ $ $ 1.75 — 1.75 0.50 0.16 0.66 $ $ $ $ 1.75 — 1.75 0.45 0.21 0.66 $ $ $ $ 1.80 — 1.80 0.27 0.39 0.66 The Company records a benefit for uncertain income tax positions if the result of a tax position meets a “more likely than not” recognition threshold. No liabilities have been recorded as of December 31, 2015 or 2014 as a result of this provision. The Company expects no significant increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within one year of 85 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2015. Returns for the calendar years 2012 through 2015 remain subject to examination by federal and various state tax jurisdictions. (15) Provision for Impairment of Investment Properties As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company identified indicators of impairment at certain of its properties. Such indicators included a low occupancy rate, difficulty in leasing space and related cost of re-leasing, financially troubled tenants or reduced anticipated holding periods. The following table summarizes the results of these analyses as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013: 2015 December 31, 2014 2013 Number of properties for which indicators of impairment were identified Less: number of properties for which an impairment charge was recorded Less: number of properties that were held for sale as of the date the analysis was performed for which indicators of impairment were identified but no impairment charge was recorded Remaining properties for which indicators of impairment were identified but no impairment charge was considered necessary 3 — — 3 (a) 8 3 1 4 (b) 14 3 1 10 Weighted average percentage by which the projected undiscounted cash flows exceeded its respective carrying value for each of the remaining properties (c) 42% 48% 20% (a) Includes seven properties which have subsequently been sold as of December 31, 2015. (b) Includes 11 properties which have subsequently been sold as of December 31, 2015. (c) Based upon the estimated holding period for each asset where an undiscounted cash flow analysis was performed. The Company recorded the following investment property impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2015: Provision for Impairment of Investment Properties $ $ 2,289 1,655 169 2,484 13,340 19,937 43,720 Property Name Massillon Commons (a) Traveler’s Office Building (a) Shaw’s Supermarket (a) Southgate Plaza (a) Bellevue Mall (a) Property Type Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Development Impairment Date June 4, 2015 June 30, 2015 August 6, 2015 December 18, 2015 December 31, 2015 Square Footage 245,900 50,800 65,700 86,100 369,300 Estimated fair value of impaired properties as of impairment date $ (a) The Company recorded impairment charges based upon the terms and conditions of an executed sales contract for the respective properties, which were sold during 2015. 86 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company recorded the following investment property impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2014: Property Name Midtown Center (a) Gloucester Town Center Boston Commons (a) Four Peaks Plaza (a) Shaw’s Supermarket (c) The Gateway (d) Newburgh Crossing (a) Hartford Insurance Building (e) Citizen’s Property Insurance Building (e) Aon Hewitt East Campus (f) Property Type Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Single-user office Single-user office Impairment Date March 31, 2014 Various (b) August 19, 2014 August 27, 2014 September 30, 2014 September 30, 2014 December 22, 2014 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2014 Square Footage Provision for Impairment of Investment Properties 408,500 107,200 103,400 140,400 65,700 623,200 62,900 97,400 59,800 343,000 Total $ $ 394 6,148 453 4,154 6,230 42,999 1,139 5,782 4,341 563 72,203 Estimated fair value of impaired properties as of impairment date $ 190,953 (a) The Company recorded impairment charges based upon the terms and conditions of an executed sales contract for each of the respective properties, which were sold during 2014. (b) An impairment charge was recorded on June 30, 2014 based upon the terms of a bona fide purchase offer and additional impairment was recognized on September 30, 2014 pursuant to the terms and conditions of an executed sales contract. (c) The Company recorded an impairment charge upon re-evaluating the strategic alternatives for the property. (d) The Company recorded an impairment charge as a result of a combination of factors including the expected impact on future operating results stemming from a re-evaluation of the anticipated positioning of, and tenant population at, the property and a re-evaluation of other potential strategic alternatives for the property. (e) The Company recorded impairment charges driven by changes in the estimated holding periods for the properties. (f) The Company recorded an impairment charge based upon the terms and conditions of an executed sales contract. This property was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014 and was sold on January 20, 2015. The Company recorded the following investment property impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2013: Property Name Aon Hewitt East Campus (a) Four Peaks Plaza (b) Lake Mead Crossing (b) Discontinued Operations: University Square (c) Raytheon Facility Shops at 5 Preston Trail Village Rite Aid – Atlanta Property Type Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user office Multi-tenant retail Multi-tenant retail Single-user retail Impairment Date September 30, 2013 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2013 June 30, 2013 Various (d) Various (d) Various (d) Various (d) Square Footage Provision for Impairment of Investment Properties $ 343,000 140,400 221,200 287,000 105,000 421,700 180,000 10,900 Total $ 27,183 7,717 24,586 59,486 6,694 2,518 21,128 1,941 266 32,547 92,033 Estimated fair value of impaired properties as of impairment date $ 134,853 (a) The Company recorded an impairment charge driven by a change in the estimated holding period for the property. The amount of the impairment charge was based upon the terms and conditions of a bona fide purchase offer. (b) The Company recorded impairment charges driven by changes in the estimated holding periods for the properties. (c) The Company recorded an impairment charge upon re-evaluating the strategic alternatives for the property, which was subsequently sold on October 25, 2013. 87 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (d) Impairment charges were recorded at various dates during the year ended December 31, 2013 initially based upon the terms of bona fide purchase offers, subsequent revisions pursuant to contract negotiations or the final disposition price, as applicable. The Company can provide no assurance that material impairment charges with respect to its investment properties will not occur in future periods. (16) Fair Value Measurements Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments: Financial liabilities: Mortgages payable, net Unsecured notes payable, net Unsecured credit facility Derivative liability December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value $ $ $ $ 1,123,136 495,576 547,526 85 $ $ $ $ 1,213,620 486,701 550,000 85 $ $ $ $ 1,623,729 248,541 446,465 562 $ $ $ $ 1,749,671 258,360 451,502 562 The carrying values of mortgages payable, net and unsecured notes payable, net in the table are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the indicated captions. The carrying value of the Unsecured Credit Facility is comprised of the “Unsecured term loan, net” and the “Unsecured revolving line of credit” and the carrying value of the derivative liability is included in “Other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair Value Hierarchy A fair value measurement is based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in an orderly transaction. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value are as follows: • Level 1 Inputs — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 Inputs — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. • Level 3 Inputs — Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Recurring Fair Value Measurements The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these instruments are described after the table. December 31, 2015 Derivative liability December 31, 2014 Derivative liability Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Fair Value $ $ — $ 85 — $ 562 $ $ — $ 85 — $ 562 Derivative liability: The fair value of the derivative liability is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected future cash flows of each derivative. This analysis utilizes observable market data including forward yield curves and implied volatilities to determine the market’s expectation of the future cash flows of the variable component. The fixed and variable components of the derivative are then discounted using calculated discount factors developed based on the LIBOR swap rate and 88 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are aggregated to arrive at a single valuation for the period. The Company also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are appropriately classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements. The Company’s derivative instruments are further described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements The Company did not have any assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2015. The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2014 aggregated by the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall. The table includes information related to properties remeasured to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2014, except for those properties sold prior to December 31, 2014. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these assets are described after the table. Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Provision for Impairment (a) December 31, 2014 Investment properties Investment properties – held for sale (c) $ $ — — $ $ — 17,233 $ $ 86,500 (b) $ $ — 86,500 17,233 $ $ 59,352 563 (a) Excludes impairment charges recorded on investment properties sold prior to December 31, 2014. (b) Represents the fair values of the Company’s Shaw’s Supermarket, The Gateway, Hartford Insurance Building and Citizen’s Property Insurance Building investment properties. The estimated fair values of Shaw’s Supermarket and The Gateway of $3,100 and $75,400, respectively, were determined using the income approach. The income approach involves discounting the estimated income stream and reversion (presumed sale) value of a property over an estimated holding period to a present value at a risk-adjusted rate. Discount rates, growth assumptions and terminal capitalization rates utilized in this approach are derived from property-specific information, market transactions and other industry data. The terminal capitalization rate and discount rate are significant inputs to this valuation. The following were the key Level 3 inputs used in estimating the fair value of Shaw’s Supermarket and The Gateway as of September 30, 2014, the date the assets were measured at fair value: Rental growth rates Operating expense growth rates Discount rates Terminal capitalization rates 2014 Low Varies (i) 1.39% 8.25% 7.50% High Varies (i) 3.70% 9.50% 8.50% (i) Since cash flow models are established at the tenant level, projected rental revenue growth rates fluctuate over the course of the estimated holding period based upon the timing of lease rollover, amount of available space and other property and space-specific factors. The estimated fair values of Hartford Insurance Building and Citizen’s Property Insurance Building of $5,000 and $3,000, respectively, were based upon third party comparable sales prices, which contain unobservable inputs used by these third parties to determine the estimated fair values. (c) Represents an impairment charge recorded during the the three months ended December 31, 2014 for Aon Hewitt East Campus, which was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2014. Such charge, calculated as the expected sales price from the executed sales contract less estimated transaction costs as compared to the Company’s carrying value of its investment, was determined to be a Level 2 input. The estimated transaction costs totaling $738 are not reflected as a reduction to the fair value disclosed in the table above but were included in the calculation of the impairment charge. 89 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Fair Value Disclosures The following table presents the Company’s financial liabilities, which are measured at fair value for disclosure purposes, by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these instruments are described after the table. December 31, 2015 Mortgages payable, net Unsecured notes payable, net Unsecured credit facility December 31, 2014 Mortgages payable, net Unsecured notes payable Unsecured credit facility Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Fair Value $ $ $ $ $ $ 239,482 — $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,213,620 247,219 550,000 — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,749,671 258,360 451,502 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,213,620 486,701 550,000 1,749,671 258,360 451,502 Mortgages payable, net: The Company estimates the fair value of its mortgages payable by discounting the anticipated future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered to the Company by its lenders for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. The rates used are not directly observable in the marketplace and judgment is used in determining the appropriate rate for each of the Company’s individual mortgages payable based upon the specific terms of the agreement, including the term to maturity, the quality and nature of the underlying property and its leverage ratio. The rates used range from 2.2% to 6.0% and 2.2% to 4.0% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Unsecured notes payable, net: The quoted market price as of December 31, 2015 was used to value the Company’s 4.00% notes. The Company estimates the fair value of its Series A and B notes by discounting the future cash flows at rates currently offered to the Company by its lenders for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. The rates used are not directly observable in the marketplace and judgment is used in determining the appropriate rates. The weighted average rate used was 4.64% and 3.97% as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Unsecured Credit Facility: The Company estimates the fair value of its Unsecured Credit Facility by discounting the anticipated future cash flows related to the credit spreads at rates currently offered to the Company by its lenders for similar facilities of comparable maturities. The rates used are not directly observable in the marketplace and judgment is used in determining the appropriate rates. The rates used to discount the credit spreads were 1.30% and 1.35% for the unsecured term loan as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 1.35% for the unsecured revolving line of credit as of December 31, 2015. There were no amounts drawn on the unsecured revolving line of credit as of December 31, 2014. There were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. (17) Commitments and Contingencies Insurance Captive On December 1, 2014, the Company formed a wholly-owned captive insurance company, Birch Property and Casualty LLC (Birch), which insures the Company’s first layer of property and general liability insurance claims subject to certain limitations. The Company capitalized Birch in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements and Birch established annual premiums based on projections derived from the past loss experience of the Company’s properties. Guarantees Although the mortgage loans obtained by the Company are generally non-recourse, occasionally the Company may guarantee all or a portion of the debt on a full-recourse basis. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had guaranteed $1,978 of its outstanding mortgage loans related to one mortgage loan with a maturity date of September 30, 2016. 90 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (18) Litigation The Company is subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. (19) Subsequent Events Subsequent to December 31, 2015, the Company: • • • entered into its fourth amended and restated unsecured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions to provide for an unsecured credit facility aggregating $1,200,000. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further details; closed on the acquisition of a two-property portfolio consisting of Shoppes at Hagerstown, a 113,200 square foot multi- tenant retail property located in Hagerstown, Maryland, for a gross purchase price of $27,055 and Merrifield Town Center II, a 138,000 square foot property, consisting of 76,000 square feet of retail space and 62,000 square feet of storage space, located in Falls Church, Virginia, for a gross purchase price of $45,676; closed on the disposition of The Gateway, a 623,200 square foot multi-tenant retail property located in Salt Lake City, Utah, through a lender-directed sale in full satisfaction of its mortgage obligation. Immediately prior to the disposition, the lender reduced the Company’s loan obligation to $75,000 which was assumed by the buyer in connection with the disposition, resulting in an anticipated gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13,653 and an anticipated gain on sale of approximately $3,868; and • closed on the disposition of Stateline Station, a 142,600 square foot multi-tenant retail property located in Kansas City, Missouri, for a sales price of $17,500 with an anticipated gain on sale of approximately $4,253. On February 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared the cash dividend for the first quarter of 2016 for the Company’s 7.00% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock. The dividend of $0.4375 per preferred share will be paid on March 31, 2016 to preferred shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2016. On February 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared the distribution for the first quarter of 2016 of $0.165625 per share on the Company’s outstanding Class A common stock, which will be paid on April 8, 2016 to Class A common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2016. 91 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (20) Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited) The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data for the Company: Total revenues Net income Net income attributable to common shareholders Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic and diluted Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted Total revenues Net income (loss) Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders Net income (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic and diluted 2015 Dec 31 148,920 3,535 644 Sep 30 150,955 78,329 75,967 $ $ $ — $ 0.32 Jun 30 150,888 30,684 28,321 0.12 $ $ $ $ Mar 31 153,197 13,076 10,714 0.05 $ $ $ $ 236,477 236,439 236,354 236,250 236,479 236,553 236,356 236,253 Dec 31 153,531 25,865 23,502 0.10 2014 Sep 30 151,446 (26,736) (29,098) (0.12) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Jun 30 146,446 30,043 27,680 0.12 Mar 31 149,191 14,128 11,766 0.05 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic 236,204 236,203 236,176 236,151 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted 236,207 236,203 236,179 236,153 92 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2015 Allowance for doubtful accounts Tax valuation allowance Year ended December 31, 2014 Allowance for doubtful accounts Tax valuation allowance Year ended December 31, 2013 Allowance for doubtful accounts Tax valuation allowance Balance at beginning of year Charged to costs and expenses Write-offs Balance at end of year $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,497 20,355 8,197 18,631 6,452 7,852 3,069 3,263 2,689 1,724 4,600 10,779 (2,656) $ — $ 7,910 23,618 (3,389) $ — $ 7,497 20,355 (2,855) $ — $ 8,197 18,631 93 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed $ 2,863 $ 1,300 $ 5,319 $ 871 $ 1,300 $ 6,190 $ 7,490 $ 2,311 2003 Date Acquired 12/04 — — — — — 1,230 1,340 1,050 3,215 1,045 3,752 2,943 3,954 3,963 5,700 1,102 — 21,052 — 4,573 9,497 — 3 6 — 394 507 31 11,313 6,375 21,304 1,670 — — 3,280 318 8,482 10,350 4,530 — — 10,348 — 18,367 11,901 63 341 680 — 2,230 4,170 — — 45,300 5,500 12,038 26,657 14,002 3,510 5,125 3,220 94 1,230 1,340 1,050 3,215 1,045 3,752 2,946 3,960 3,963 6,094 4,982 4,286 5,010 7,178 7,139 1,569 2004 1,205 2004 1,621 2004 1,586 2004 2,494 2003 — 21,559 21,559 8,300 2002 4,573 6,375 3,280 318 9,528 14,101 405 2005 22,974 29,349 9,763 2004 10,411 13,691 3,147 2007 341 659 28 n/a 10,350 19,047 29,397 7,817 2004 07/04 07/04 07/04 07/04 04/04 05/05 11/14 10/04 10/07 05/06 10/04 4,530 11,901 16,431 4,541 2000-2002 07/05 4,170 15,548 19,718 6,022 1994 45,300 31,782 77,082 12,253 1977/2004 04/05 5,500 17,222 22,722 6,279 1960/1999- 2000 09/05 09/04 04/05 — 114,703 (28,975) — 85,728 85,728 24,907 2004 Property Name 23rd Street Plaza Panama City, FL Academy Sports Houma, LA Academy Sports Midland, TX Academy Sports Port Arthur, TX Academy Sports San Antonio, TX Alison's Corner San Antonio, TX Ashland & Roosevelt Chicago, IL Avondale Plaza Redmond, WA Azalea Square I Summerville, SC Azalea Square III Summerville, SC Beachway Plaza outparcel Bradenton, FL Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza Miami, FL Bed Bath & Beyond Plaza Westbury, NY Boulevard at The Capital Centre Largo, MD Boulevard Plaza Pawtucket, RI The Brickyard Chicago, IL Broadway Shopping Center Bangor, ME RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed 2,600 13,255 15,855 5,116 1985 Encumbrance Land 4,659 2,600 — 23,923 45,357 13,000 12,005 13,829 47,559 1,250 129 7,562 19,000 8,406 16,761 7,100 8,500 33,212 16,060 11,728 1,833 2,290 15 1,775 5,023 7,026 1,180 12,382 — — — — — — — 23,923 13,000 18,700 7,100 8,500 3,450 1,775 5,023 13,958 37,881 562 2013 55,121 68,121 17,456 2004 25,467 44,167 8,975 2005 35,045 42,145 13,467 1996 18,350 26,850 6,939 2004 11,743 15,193 4,412 2000 8,206 9,981 3,166 2003-2004 04/05 12,382 17,405 170 1991 16,700 22,775 2,103 16,700 24,878 41,578 8,381 1997 11,671 5,830 19,439 — 6,413 9,802 191 15 5,830 6,413 19,630 25,460 8,131 2004 9,817 16,230 687 2001 25,606 12,000 35,887 1,567 12,000 37,454 49,454 14,617 1999 10,589 2,919 13,281 57 2,919 13,338 16,257 1,209 1999 13,183 10,200 26,178 3,031 10,200 29,209 39,409 11,681 2004 14,213 6,900 10,146 3,000 23,851 19,158 (30) 340 95 6,900 3,000 23,821 30,721 10,534 1999-2003 01/04 19,498 22,498 7,722 2004-2005 02/05 Date Acquired 04/05 02/15 12/06 02/06 06/05 05/05 03/05 08/15 05/06 8/04 & 10/04 06/14 04/05 10/13 12/04 Property Name Brown's Lane Middletown, RI Cedar Park Town Center Cedar Park, TX Central Texas Marketplace Waco, TX Centre at Laurel Laurel, MD Century III Plaza West Mifflin, PA Chantilly Crossing Chantilly, VA Woodridge, IL Clearlake Shores Clear Lake, TX Coal Creek Marketplace Newcastle, WA Colony Square Sugar Land, TX The Columns Jackson, TN Commons at Royal Palm Royal Palm Beach, FL The Commons at Temecula Temecula, CA Coppell Town Center Coppell, TX Coram Plaza Coram, NY Corwest Plaza New Britain, CT Cottage Plaza Pawtucket, RI Cinemark Seven Bridges 4,659 3,450 Cuyahoga Falls Market Center 3,440 3,350 11,083 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements 10,408 3,000 18,736 1,303 Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Date Acquired 20,039 23,039 8,255 1996-1997 07/04 954 8,212 665 2000 11,658 15,008 4,524 1998 2,891 2,402 1,958 2,659 4,370 3,583 3,254 2,472 3,801 3,377 2,708 3,259 5,302 4,203 4,354 3,072 1,113 1999 1,068 2003 759 1999 1,040 2004 1,959 2003 1,379 1999 1,282 2004 1,012 2004 10,061 15,023 1,028 2004 07/05 04/05 06/05 12/03 05/05 05/05 12/03 06/05 03/05 10/04 10/13 7,013 8,684 2,788 2003-2004 06/04 55,065 61,065 22,289 2003-2004 10/04 3,000 7,258 3,350 910 975 750 600 932 620 1,100 600 4,962 1,671 6,000 — 7,318 954 — 2,095 — — 3,309 — — — — — 910 975 750 600 932 620 1,100 600 4,962 1,850 2,891 2,400 1,958 2,659 4,370 3,583 3,254 2,469 9,976 5,681 (60) 575 — 2 — — — — — 3 85 1,153 1,035 1,375 25,737 6,000 43,434 11,631 20,210 17,025 29,478 17,025 30,513 47,538 13,528 2003-2004 3/04 & 7/04 — — 43,367 110,785 43,367 112,160 155,527 4,115 2014 2,900 28,714 (747) 2,826 28,041 30,867 9,727 2005 96 01/15 06/06 Property Name Cranberry Square Cranberry Township, PA Crown Theater Hartford, CT Cuyahoga Falls, OH CVS Pharmacy Burleson, TX CVS Pharmacy (Eckerd) Edmond, OK CVS Pharmacy Lawton, OK CVS Pharmacy Moore, OK CVS Pharmacy (Eckerd) Norman, OK CVS Pharmacy Oklahoma City, OK CVS Pharmacy Saginaw, TX CVS Pharmacy Sylacauga, AL Cypress Mill Plaza Cypress, TX Davis Towne Crossing North Richland Hills, TX Denton Crossing Denton, TX Dorman Center I & II Spartanburg, SC Downtown Crown Gaithersburg, MD East Stone Commons Kingsport, TN RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed — 12,000 65,067 3,797 12,000 68,864 80,864 28,315 2002 Date Acquired 05/04 11/04 05/05 05/05 12/04 6,138 3,500 8,977 — 12,979 11,800 4,028 1,700 — — — 4,800 2,540 17,209 7,991 2,430 — 16,118 8,525 3,755 3,500 11,361 14,861 4,591 2003 — 35,421 35,421 13,853 1988 11,800 33,098 44,898 12,944 1997 10,956 35,421 33,098 6,425 405 — — 911 13,490 4,354 7,336 9,036 2,754 1995 17,213 22,644 6,695 2002-2004 01/05 1,700 5,431 2,540 6,393 96,547 14,836 44,880 15,563 458 (218) 800 — 6,851 9,391 17,209 96,329 113,538 2,725 7,549 1999/2004- 2005 Redev: 2009 12/04 & 3/05 11/13 2,430 15,636 18,066 6,497 2002 16,118 44,880 60,998 1,780 2008 07/04 01/15 (930) 3,755 14,633 18,388 6,063 2003-2004 11/04 26,522 — 47,403 2,884 — 50,287 50,287 20,690 1988 — 1,250 4,947 36,523 12,348 56,199 378 421 1,250 5,325 6,575 2,051 2004 12,348 56,620 68,968 3,330 2000 06/04 06/05 06/14 94,328 28,665 110,945 (62,566) 18,163 58,881 77,044 4,469 2001-2003 05/05 22,920 9,880 — — 55,195 26,371 1,358 3,693 97 9,880 56,553 66,433 22,605 2003-2004 12/04 — 30,064 30,064 12,204 2000 07/04 Property Name Eastwood Towne Center Lansing, MI Edgemont Town Center Homewood, AL Edwards Multiplex Fresno, CA Edwards Multiplex Ontario, CA Evans Towne Centre Evans, GA Fairgrounds Plaza Middletown, NY Five Forks Simpsonville, SC Fordham Place Bronx, NY Forks Town Center Easton, PA Fort Evans Plaza II Leesburg, VA Fox Creek Village Longmont, CO Fullerton Metrocenter Fullerton, CA Galvez Shopping Center Galveston, TX Gardiner Manor Mall Bay Shore, NY The Gateway Salt Lake City, UT Gateway Pavilions Avondale, AZ Gateway Plaza Southlake, TX RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Date Acquired 5,018 6,068 1,986 2003-2004 12/04 11,604 14,884 3,314 2006-2007 05/07 Property Name Gateway Station College Station, TX Gateway Station II & III College Station, TX Gateway Village Annapolis, MD Gerry Centennial Plaza Oswego, IL Governor's Marketplace Tallahassee, FL Grapevine Crossing Grapevine, TX Green's Corner Cumming, GA Gurnee Town Center Gurnee, IL Henry Town Center McDonough, GA Heritage Square Issaquah, WA — — 1,050 3,280 35,428 8,550 — — — 5,370 — 4,100 5,017 3,200 14,286 7,000 — — 10,650 6,377 Heritage Towne Crossing 7,904 3,065 Euless, TX Hickory Ridge Hickory, NC High Ridge Crossing High Ridge, MO Holliday Towne Center Duncansville, PA Home Depot Center Pittsburgh, PA Home Depot Plaza Orange, CT HQ Building San Antonio, TX 18,242 6,860 4,659 3,075 7,352 2,200 — — 10,682 9,700 — 5,200 3,911 1,107 11,557 39,298 12,968 30,377 16,938 8,663 35,147 46,814 11,385 10,729 33,323 9,148 11,609 16,758 17,137 10,010 47 4,950 9,214 3,037 235 262 4,644 6,873 1,271 1,442 612 (204) (333) — 1,666 4,209 98 1,050 3,280 8,550 5,370 44,248 52,798 18,061 1996 22,182 27,552 6,618 2006 — 33,414 33,414 13,918 2001 3,894 3,200 7,000 17,379 21,273 6,726 2001 8,925 12,125 3,594 1997 39,791 46,791 15,793 2000 10,650 53,687 64,337 19,826 2002 6,377 3,065 6,860 3,075 2,200 12,656 19,033 852 1985 12,171 15,236 5,226 2002 33,935 40,795 13,819 1999 8,944 12,019 3,554 2004 11,276 13,476 4,589 2003 — 16,758 16,758 6,451 1996 07/04 06/07 08/04 04/05 12/04 10/04 12/04 02/14 03/04 01/04 03/05 02/05 06/05 06/05 9,700 5,200 18,803 28,503 7,047 1992 14,219 19,419 5,218 Redev: 2004 12/05 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed 18,087 64,884 82,971 3,766 1996 — — 18,087 2,200 4,750 2,600 — — — — 23,097 14,446 3,710 16,005 1,536 2,075 6,600 4,750 — — — 64,731 12,823 9,247 52,762 23,932 19,144 37,744 4,009 30,910 23,904 153 1,042 1,219 1,432 90 (150) 3,928 101 7,802 2,718 25,896 38,329 17,772 327 — — — 13,000 46,482 22,731 2,910 7,423 16,614 799 (277) (8) 6,629 4,710 16,265 1,875 6,000 2,635 15,040 (767) 38,329 13,110 2,486 7,415 4,710 2,635 99 2,200 2,579 23,097 14,446 13,865 16,065 4,800 Renov: 2005 11/05 10,487 13,066 4,045 1980 & 1985 12/04 54,194 77,291 15,596 2005 24,022 38,468 1,566 2004 3,710 18,994 22,704 7,053 2005 16,005 41,672 57,677 17,323 1996/1999 01/04 2,065 6,600 4,750 4,120 6,185 1,685 1999 38,712 45,312 12,245 2005 26,622 31,372 9,979 2004 Date Acquired 06/14 02/08 06/14 11/05 10/04 06/06 05/05 06/04 06/14 69,103 82,213 24,947 2001-2004 09/05 16,761 19,247 6,905 2004 & 2005 799 8,214 550 2005 06/04 & 09/05 08/05 18,140 22,850 7,830 1995-1996 02/04 14,273 16,908 5,779 2004 02/05 12,555 74,612 (14,100) 12,555 60,512 73,067 24,647 18,099 56,428 1,106 1998/2002- 2003 1997 Property Name Huebner Oaks Center San Antonio, TX Humblewood Shopping Center Humble, TX Irmo Station Irmo, SC Jefferson Commons Newport News, VA John's Creek Village John's Creek, GA King Philip's Crossing Seekonk, MA La Plaza Del Norte San Antonio, TX Lake Mary Pointe Lake Mary, FL Lake Worth Towne Crossing (a) Lake Worth, TX Lakepointe Towne Center Lewisville, TX Lakewood Towne Center Lakewood, WA Lincoln Park Dallas, TX Lincoln Plaza Worcester, MA Low Country Village I & II Bluffton, SC Lowe's/Bed, Bath & Beyond Butler, NJ MacArthur Crossing Los Colinas, TX Magnolia Square Houma, LA RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Property Name Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Date Acquired Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Manchester Meadows Town and Country, MO Mansfield Towne Crossing Mansfield, TX Maple Tree Place Williston, VT Merrifield Town Center Falls Church, VA Mid-Hudson Center Poughkeepsie, NY Mitchell Ranch Plaza New Port Richey, FL New Forest Crossing Houston, TX Newnan Crossing I & II Newnan, GA Newton Crossroads Covington, GA — — — — — — — — 14,700 3,300 28,000 18,678 9,900 5,550 4,390 39,738 12,195 67,361 36,496 29,160 26,213 11,313 2,852 3,625 4,950 18 60 795 (6) 14,700 42,590 57,290 16,870 1994-1995 08/04 3,300 15,820 19,120 6,408 2003-2004 11/04 28,000 18,678 9,900 5,550 4,390 72,311 100,311 28,245 2004-2005 05/05 36,514 55,192 1,297 2008 29,220 39,120 11,149 2000 27,008 32,558 11,111 2003 11,307 15,697 1,100 2003 01/15 07/05 08/04 10/13 15,100 33,987 5,911 15,100 39,898 54,998 16,422 3,533 3,350 6,927 7,233 10,583 2,816 1999 & 2004 1997 12/03 & 02/04 12/04 North Rivers Towne Center 9,516 3,350 15,720 Charleston, SC Northgate North Seattle, WA Northpointe Plaza Spokane, WA Northwood Crossing Northport, AL Northwoods Center Wesley Chapel, FL Orange Plaza (Golfland Plaza) Orange, CT The Orchard New Hartford, NY Oswego Commons Oswego, IL 26,645 7,540 49,078 (14,640) 22,016 13,800 — 3,770 8,035 3,415 — — 4,350 3,200 21,000 6,454 37,707 13,658 9,475 4,834 17,151 16,004 4,667 1,191 6,659 2,362 225 502 100 306 323 3,350 3,350 7,540 16,043 19,393 6,848 2003-2004 04/04 34,438 41,978 14,920 1999-2003 06/04 13,800 42,374 56,174 17,531 1991-1993 05/04 3,770 3,415 4,350 3,200 6,454 14,849 18,619 5,361 1979/2004 01/06 16,134 19,549 6,360 2002-2004 12/04 7,196 11,546 2,539 1995 05/05 17,376 20,576 6,526 2004-2005 16,506 22,960 1,168 2002-2004 07/05 & 9/05 06/14 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Date Acquired — — 13,420 — — — — 6,142 — 24,073 6,995 3,937 2,600 10,507 11,200 8,766 6,600 — — 12,975 4,200 — — 2,400 1,790 32,784 43,355 20,425 20,423 406 1,147 785 6,561 13,400 33,210 46,610 11,454 2004 & 2006 — 44,502 44,502 16,519 1999 6,590 6,142 21,210 27,800 9,117 2002 26,984 33,126 9,427 2010 10,274 12,392 12,144 10,274 24,536 34,810 — 67,936 67,936 8,451 5,894 2002-2003 & 2005 2008 67,870 32,816 6,776 11,751 13,728 28,588 29,085 9,246 6,178 66 3,886 321 2,080 862 3,237 3,610 25 219 8,495 2,600 35,202 43,697 14,925 7,097 9,697 2,889 2002-2003 & 2005 2004 11,200 13,831 25,031 5,269 1973/2000 12/04 6,600 14,590 21,190 5,948 1995 07/04 — 31,825 31,825 13,449 2000-2002 06/04 4,200 2,400 1,790 32,695 36,895 12,803 2004 12/04 9,271 11,671 3,509 2004-2005 09/05 6,397 8,187 2,459 2004 12/05 07/05 & 06/07 05/05 04/04 08/06 12/03 & 06/06 11/13 03/04 & 05/05 12/04 Paradise Valley Marketplace 8,707 6,590 Property Name Pacheco Pass Phase I & II Gilroy, CA Page Field Commons Fort Myers, FL Phoenix, AZ Parkway Towne Crossing Frisco, TX Pavilion at Kings Grant I & II Concord, NC Pelham Manor Shopping Plaza Pelham Manor, NY Peoria Crossings I & II Peoria, AZ Phenix Crossing Phenix City, AL Placentia Town Center Placentia, CA Plaza at Marysville Marysville, WA Plaza Santa Fe II Santa Fe, NM Pleasant Run Cedar Hill, TX Quakertown Quakertown, PA Red Bug Village Winter Springs, FL Reisterstown Road Plaza Baltimore, MD 46,169 15,800 70,372 14,642 15,791 85,023 100,814 33,975 1986/2004 08/04 Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Sheridan Dr. Amherst, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Transit Rd. Amherst, NY — — 2,000 2,500 2,722 2,764 — 2 101 2,000 2,500 2,722 2,766 4,722 5,266 1,014 1999 1,031 2003 11/05 11/05 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Property Name Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), E. Main St. Batavia, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), W. Main St. Batavia, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Ferry St. Buffalo, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Main St. Buffalo, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Canandaigua, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Chattanooga, TN Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Cheektowaga, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Colesville, MD Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Columbia, SC Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Crossville, TN Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Grand Island, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Greece, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Greer, SC Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Hudson, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Irondequoit, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Kill Devil Hills, NC Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Lancaster, NY — — — — — — — 1,860 1,510 900 1,340 1,968 750 2,080 2,903 3,000 1,557 1,241 — — 900 600 900 470 1,495 1,050 — — 2,060 1,940 1,778 700 — 1,710 2,786 2,627 2,677 2,192 2,575 2,042 1,393 3,955 2,377 2,033 2,475 2,657 2,047 1,873 2,736 2,960 1,207 1,860 1,510 900 1,340 1,968 750 2,080 3,000 900 600 900 470 1,050 2,060 1,913 700 1,710 2,805 2,627 2,677 2,192 2,576 2,042 1,393 3,977 2,377 2,034 2,475 2,657 2,048 1,873 2,736 2,961 1,207 4,665 4,137 3,577 3,532 4,544 2,792 3,473 6,977 3,277 2,634 3,375 3,127 3,098 3,933 4,649 3,661 2,917 19 — — — 1 — — 22 — 1 — — 1 — (27) 1 — 102 1,042 2004 979 998 817 960 786 519 2001 2000 1998 2004 1999 1999 1,548 2005 Date Acquired 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 06/05 11/05 05/05 1,036 2003-2004 06/04 863 2003-2004 06/04 917 990 1999 1998 11/05 11/05 869 2003-2004 06/04 698 2002 1,020 2002 11/05 11/05 1,257 2003-2004 06/04 450 1999 11/05 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Property Name Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Lockport, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) North Chili, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Olean, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Culver Rd. Rochester, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Lake Ave. Rochester, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Tonawanda, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Harlem Rd. West Seneca, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd), Union Rd. West Seneca, NY Rite Aid Store (Eckerd) Yorkshire, NY Rivery Town Crossing Georgetown, TX Royal Oaks Village II (a) Houston, TX Saucon Valley Square Bethlehem, PA Sawyer Heights Village Houston, TX Shoppes at Park West Mt. Pleasant, SC — — — — — — — — — — — 1,650 820 1,190 1,590 2,220 800 2,830 1,610 810 2,900 3,450 8,071 3,200 18,851 24,214 5,020 2,240 The Shoppes at Quarterfield — 2,190 Severn, MD Shoppes of New Hope Dallas, GA 3,441 1,350 Shoppes of Prominence Point I&II — 3,650 Canton, GA 2,788 1,935 2,809 2,279 3,025 3,075 1,683 2,300 1,434 6,814 16,955 12,642 15,797 9,357 8,840 11,045 12,652 — — — — 2 — — — — 376 262 (155) 452 25 135 5 160 103 2,788 1,935 2,809 2,279 3,027 3,075 1,683 2,300 1,434 4,438 2,755 3,999 3,869 5,247 3,875 4,513 3,910 2,244 1,039 2002 721 2000 1,047 1999 849 2001 1,128 2001 1,146 2000 627 857 534 2003 2000 1997 7,190 10,090 2,486 2005 1,650 820 1,190 1,590 2,220 800 2,830 1,610 810 2,900 3,450 3,200 17,217 20,667 4,391 2004-2005 11/05 12,487 15,687 4,702 1999 24,214 16,249 40,463 1,492 2007 2,240 2,190 1,350 3,650 9,382 11,622 3,854 2004 8,975 11,165 3,899 1999 11,050 12,400 4,636 2004 12,812 16,462 5,399 2004 & 2005 Date Acquired 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 11/05 10/06 09/04 10/13 11/04 01/04 07/04 06/04 & 09/05 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Property Name Shops at Forest Commons Round Rock, TX The Shops at Legacy Plano, TX Shops at Park Place Plano, TX Southlake Corners Southlake, TX Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements — — 1,050 8,800 6,133 261 108,940 14,057 7,616 9,096 21,118 6,612 13,175 23,605 625 85 1,050 8,800 9,096 6,612 Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed 6,394 7,444 2,539 2002 122,997 131,797 38,554 2002 13,800 22,896 6,427 2001 23,690 30,302 2,101 2004 Southlake Town Square I - VII (a) 138,623 41,490 201,028 23,610 41,490 224,638 266,128 75,937 1998-2007 Southlake, TX Stateline Station Kansas City, MO Stilesboro Oaks Acworth, GA Stonebridge Plaza McKinney, TX Stony Creek I Noblesville, IN Stony Creek II Noblesville, IN Streets of Yorktown Houston, TX Target South Center Austin, TX Tim Horton Donut Shop Canandaigua, NY Tollgate Marketplace Bel Air, MD Town Square Plaza Pottstown, PA Towson Circle Towson, MD Towson Square Towson, MD — 6,500 23,780 (14,003) 4,801 2,200 — 1,000 9,426 5,783 431 315 8,079 6,735 17,564 1,536 — — — — 1,900 3,440 2,300 212 34,920 8,700 16,750 9,700 — — 9,050 13,757 5,106 79 22,111 2,881 8,760 30 61,247 18,264 17,840 21,958 660 — 6,062 1,667 (788) — 104 3,829 2,200 1,000 6,735 1,900 3,440 2,300 212 8,700 9,700 6,874 12,448 16,277 3,682 2003-2004 9,857 12,057 3,834 1997 6,098 7,098 2,345 1997 19,100 25,835 8,370 2003 5,185 7,085 1,919 2005 24,992 28,432 9,099 2005 9,420 11,720 3,606 1999 30 242 21 2004 67,309 76,009 26,559 1979/1994 07/04 19,931 29,631 7,267 2004 19,228 26,102 7,773 1998 13,757 21,958 35,715 140 2014 Date Acquired 12/04 06/07 10/03 10/13 12/04, 5/07, 9/08 & 3/09 03/05 12/04 08/05 12/03 11/05 12/05 11/05 11/05 12/05 07/04 11/15 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) — 22,525 7,184 22,525 7,184 29,709 170 University Town Center 4,206 — 9,557 Tuscaloosa, AL Vail Ranch Plaza Temecula, CA — 6,200 16,275 Village Shoppes at Gainesville 19,651 4,450 36,592 1,281 — 144 174 Date Constructed 1980 Renov:2004, 2012/2013 2002 Date Acquired 05/15 11/04 9,701 9,701 3,973 16,449 22,649 6,414 2004-2005 04/05 37,873 42,323 14,281 2004 10,884 13,084 4,528 2004 5,074 5,524 1,909 2000 14,500 17,453 31,953 6,111 2005 27,634 32,819 11,882 2003-2004 05/04 10,665 11,835 4,096 2004 35,789 43,989 13,620 2000 7,919 12,319 3,109 1999 16,073 20,950 37,023 507 1981 7,900 137,109 145,009 53,529 1986 & 1990 11/04 — 6,200 4,450 2,200 450 5,185 1,170 8,200 4,400 09/05 08/04 04/05 07/06 06/05 07/05 11/04 06/15 3,176 2,200 10,874 — — — — — 450 14,500 5,185 1,170 8,200 5,376 4,400 5,074 16,914 27,504 10,488 35,538 7,471 — — 16,073 20,933 7,900 137,096 10 — 539 130 177 251 448 17 13 Property Name Tysons Corner Vienna, VA Gainesville, GA Village Shoppes at Simonton Lawrenceville, GA Walgreens Northwoods, MO Walter's Crossing Tampa, FL Watauga Pavilion Watauga, TX West Town Market Fort Mill, SC Wilton Square Saratoga Springs, NY Winchester Commons Memphis, TN Woodinville Plaza Woodinville, WA Zurich Towers Schaumburg, IL Total Operating Properties 1,123,136 1,268,577 4,237,385 176,723 1,254,131 4,428,554 5,682,685 1,433,195 105 RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation December 31, 2015 (in thousands) Property Name Development Property South Billings Center (b) Billings, MT Total Development Property Developments in Progress Initial Cost (A) Gross amount carried at end of period Encumbrance Land Buildings and Improvements Adjustments to Basis (C) Land and Improvements Buildings and Improvements (D) Total (B), (D) Accumulated Depreciation (E) Date Constructed Date Acquired — — — — — 5,009 — — 148 — — — — — — — — — 5,009 148 5,157 — — — Total Investment Properties $ 1,123,136 $1,273,586 $ 4,237,533 $ 176,723 $ 1,259,140 $ 4,428,702 $ 5,687,842 $ 1,433,195 (a) The Company acquired a parcel at this property during 2015. (b) The cost basis associated with this property is included in Developments in Progress. 106 Notes: RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. (A) The initial cost to the Company represents the original purchase price of the property, including amounts incurred subsequent to acquisition which were contemplated at the time the property was acquired. (B) The aggregate cost of real estate owned as of December 31, 2015 for U.S. federal income tax purposes was approximately $5,745,906. (C) Adjustments to basis include payments received under master lease agreements as well as additional tangible costs associated with the investment properties, including any earnout of tenant space. (D) Reconciliation of real estate owned: Balance as of January 1, Purchase of investment property Sale of investment property Property held for sale Provision for asset impairment Acquired lease intangible assets Acquired lease intangible liabilities Balance as of December 31, (E) Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation: Balance as of January 1, Depreciation expense Sale of investment property Property held for sale Provision for asset impairment Write-offs due to early lease termination Other disposals Balance as of December 31, 2015 5,680,376 508,924 (498,833) — (4,786) (15,311) 17,472 5,687,842 2015 1,365,471 183,639 (111,346) — (2,497) (2,072) — 1,433,195 $ $ $ $ 2014 5,804,518 397,993 (338,938) (36,914) (159,447) 5,579 7,585 5,680,376 2014 1,330,474 183,142 (63,460) (5,358) (77,390) (1,937) — 1,365,471 $ $ $ $ 2013 5,962,878 339,955 (341,750) (10,995) (150,373) (11,331) 16,134 5,804,518 2013 1,275,787 197,725 (62,009) (2,206) (56,969) (3,056) (18,798) 1,330,474 $ $ $ $ Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated useful lives in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income: Building and improvements Site improvements Tenant improvements Years 30 15 Life of related lease 107 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to the members of senior management and the board of directors. Based on management’s evaluation as of December 31, 2015, our president and chief executive officer and our executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president and chief executive officer and our executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Changes in Internal Controls There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. 108 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Retail Properties of America, Inc. Oak Brook, Illinois We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Retail Properties of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 of the Company and our report dated February 17, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Chicago, Illinois February 17, 2016 109 Item 9B. Other Information None. Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III Information required by this Item 10 will be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information required by this Item 11 will be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Information required by this Item 12 will be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Information required by this Item 13 will be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Information required by this Item 14 will be included in our definitive proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. 110 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) List of documents filed: PART IV (1) The consolidated financial statements of the Company are set forth in this report in Item 8. (2) Financial Statement Schedules: The following financial statement schedules for the year ended December 31, 2015 are submitted herewith: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Schedule II) Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III) Page 93 94 Schedules not filed: All schedules other than those indicated in the index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes. Exhibit No. Description 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, dated March 20, 2012 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2012). Articles of Amendment to the Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, dated March 20, 2012 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2012). Articles of Amendment to the Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, dated March 20, 2012 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2012). Articles Supplementary to the Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, as amended, dated March 20, 2012 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2012). Articles Supplementary for the Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2012). Certificate of Correction (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report/Amended on Form 8-K/A filed on December 20, 2012). Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2012). Amendment No. 1 to the Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated February 11, 2014 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2014). Indenture, dated March 12, 2015, by and between the Registrant as Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2015). First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 12, 2015, by and between the Registrant as Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2015). Form of 4.00% Senior Notes due 2025 (attached as Exhibit A to the First Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.2) (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2015). 2014 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 31, 2014). Third Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on August 2, 2013). Indemnification Agreements by and between the Registrant and its directors and officers (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.6 A-E and H to the Registrant’s Annual Report/Amended on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 and filed on April 27, 2007, Exhibits 10.560 - 10.561 and 10.568 - 10.570 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and filed on March 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and filed on February 22, 2012, Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and filed on August 6, 2013, Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and filed on August 5, 2014, Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and filed on August 5, 2015 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and filed on November 4, 2015). 111 Exhibit No. 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 12.1 21.1 Description Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 13, 2013 among the Registrant as Borrower and KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Securities LLC as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Manager, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Syndication Agent and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Manager, and Citibank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as Co-Documentation Agent and Certain Lenders from time to time parties hereto, as Lenders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2013). First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 21, 2014 among the Registrant as Borrower and KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent and Certain Lenders from time to time parties hereto, as Lenders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and filed on May 6, 2014). Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 16, 2014 among the Registrant as Issuer and Certain Institutions as Purchasers (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2014). Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2009 by and among Colesville One, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and certain subsidiaries of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.587 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 and filed on March 5, 2010). Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 6, 2016 among the Registrant as Borrower and KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Securities LLC as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Manager, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Syndication Agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, PNC Capital Markets LLC, and Regions Capital Markets as Co-Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, each of U.S. Bank National Association, PNC Capital Markets LLC, Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A., Citibank, N.A., The Bank of Nova Scotia, Capital One, N.A., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Documentation Agents, and Certain Lenders from time to time parties hereto, as Lenders (filed herewith). Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Steven P. Grimes (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and filed on February 20, 2013). Amendment to Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2015 by and between Registrant and Steven P. Grimes (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed on May 5, 2015). Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Angela M. Aman (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and filed on February 20, 2013). Amendment to Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2015 by and between Registrant and Angela M. Aman (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed on May 5, 2015). Separation Agreement and General Release, dated May 7, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Angela M. Aman (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and filed on August 5, 2015). Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Niall J. Byrne (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and filed on February 20, 2013). Amendment to Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2015 by and between Registrant and Niall J. Byrne (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed on May 5, 2015). Separation Agreement and General Release, dated October 2, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Niall J. Byrne (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and filed on November 4, 2015). Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Shane C. Garrison (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and filed on February 20, 2013). Amendment to Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2015 by and between Registrant and Shane C. Garrison (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed on May 5, 2015). Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Dennis K. Holland (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and filed on February 20, 2013). Amendment to Retention Agreement dated February 19, 2015 by and between Registrant and Dennis K. Holland (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed on May 5, 2015). Offer Letter, dated July 13, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Heath R. Fear (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and filed on August 5, 2015). Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (filed herewith). List of Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith). 112 Exhibit No. Description 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 101 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (filed herewith). Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith). Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith). Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (furnished herewith). Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and (vi) Financial Statement Schedules. 113 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. /s/ Steven P. Grimes By: Steven P. Grimes President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 17, 2016 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: /s/ Steven P. Grimes /s/ Bonnie S. Biumi /s/ Peter L. Lynch By: Steven P. Grimes Director, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 17, 2016 By: Bonnie S. Biumi Director By: Peter L. Lynch Director Date: February 17, 2016 Date: February 17, 2016 /s/ Heath R. Fear /s/ Frank A. Catalano, Jr. /s/ Kenneth E. Masick By: Heath R. Fear Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) By: Frank A. Catalano, Jr. Director By: Kenneth E. Masick Director Date: February 17, 2016 Date: February 17, 2016 Date: February 17, 2016 /s/ Julie M. Swinehart /s/ Paul R. Gauvreau /s/ Thomas J. Sargeant By: Julie M. Swinehart Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) By: Paul R. Gauvreau Director By: Thomas J. Sargeant Director Date: February 17, 2016 Date: February 17, 2016 Date: February 17, 2016 /s/ Gerald M. Gorski /s/ Richard P. Imperiale By: Gerald M. Gorski Chairman of the Board and Director Date: February 17, 2016 By: Date: Richard P. Imperiale Director February 17, 2016 114 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures (amounts in thousands, except ratios) Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 2014 $ $ Net income attributable to common shareholders Preferred stock dividends Interest expense Depreciation and amortization Gain on sales of investment properties, net of noncontrolling interest Provision for impairment of investment properties Realignment separation charges (a) Adjusted EBITDA Annualized 644 2,363 28,328 51,361 (8,050) 15,824 1,193 91,663 366,652 23,502 2,363 32,743 52,385 (26,501) 11,825 - 96,317 385,268 $ $ $ $ Reconciliation of Borrowed Debt to Total Net Debt December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Total borrowed debt Less: consolidated cash and cash equivalents Total net debt (b) Adjusted EBITDA Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,178,505 (51,424) 2,127,081 366,652 5.8x 2,339,038 (112,292) 2,226,746 385,268 5.8x (a) Included in "General and administrative expenses" in the consolidated statements of operations. (b) Total net debt as of December 31, 2014 has been recast to exclude unamortized mortgage premium and discount. The current presentation does not change the Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio previously presented. B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S Gerald M. Gorski, Chairman Partner, Gorski & Good LLP Bonnie S. Biumi Former President and Chief Financial Officer of Kerzner International Resorts, Inc. I N V E S T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R S Current stockholder information, including the Annual Report, SEC filings and press releases, is available on our website at www.rpai.com, by e-mail request to ir@rpai.com or via telephone at 800.541.7661. Steven P. Grimes President and Chief Executive Officer Heath R. Fear Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Shane C. Garrison Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Investment Officer Dennis K. Holland Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary C O R P O R A T E O F F I C E RPAI 2021 Spring Road, Suite 200 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 855.247.RPAI www.rpai.com Frank A. Catalano, Jr. President of Catalano & Associates L E G A L C O U N S E L Goodwin Procter LLP Boston, MA I N D E P E N D E N T A U D I T O R S Deloitte & Touche LLP Chicago, IL T R A N S F E R A G E N T Computershare P.O. Box 30170 College Station, TX 77842-3170 800.368.5948 www.computershare.com Paul R. Gauvreau Former Chief Financial Officer, Financial Vice President and Treasurer of Pittway Corporation Steven P. Grimes President and Chief Executive Officer Richard P. Imperiale President and Founder of the Uniplan Companies Peter L. Lynch Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. Kenneth E. Masick Former Partner of Wolf & Company LLP Thomas J. Sargeant Former Chief Financial Officer of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. This Annual Report and the Letter to Stockholders contain “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical, including statements regarding management’s intentions, beliefs, expectations, representations, plans or predictions of the future and are typically identified by such words as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “continue,” or “anticipate” and variations of such words or similar expressions or the negative of such words. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and we include this statement for the purpose of complying with such safe harbor provisions. Future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial or otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the forward-looking statements are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements. 2 0 1 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2021 Spring Road, Suite 200 | Oak Brook, IL 60523 | 855.247.RPAI | www.rpai.com | NYSE: RPAI 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above