Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Telecommunications Services / Rogers Communications

Rogers Communications

rci · NYSE Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker rci
Exchange NYSE
Sector Communication Services
Industry Telecommunications Services
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · Rogers Communications
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Make more  
possible

Rogers Communications Inc.   |   2018 Annual Report 

Our Purpose

To connect Canadians  
to a world of possibilities  
and the memorable moments  
that matter most in their lives

2

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT    

About Rogers

We are a team of proud Canadians 
dedicated to making more possible  
for our customers each and every day.

Our founder, Ted Rogers, believed in 
the power of communication to enrich, 
entertain and embolden Canadians. 
He followed in his father’s footsteps, 
and at the age of 27, purchased his  
first radio station, CHFI.

From these modest beginnings, we 
have grown to become a formidable 
technology company. A company 
devoted to delivering the very best  
in wireless, residential and media to 
Canadians and Canadian businesses.

Table of Contents

PAGE 3

About  
Rogers

PAGE 4

A Message  
from Edward

PAGE 6

A Message  
from Joe

PAGE 8

A Year  
in Review

PAGE 10

Senior Executive  
Officers

PAGE 11

Directors

PAGE 12

2018  
Financial Report

PAGE 146

Corporate and  
Shareholder Information

3

2018 ANNUAL REPORT   ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.A MESSAGE
FROM EDWARD

Edward Rogers
Chair, Board of Directors
Rogers Communications Inc.

My Fellow Shareholders,

Rogers was founded almost 60 years ago through  
the purchase of a single radio station. Even during  
those early entrepreneurial days, Ted Rogers’ goal was 
to not only build a successful business for the long-term, 
but to also build a great Canadian company; one that 
served the needs of its local communities while also 
contributing to the leadership and development of  
a young and growing nation. He understood that  
long-term focus, discipline and ongoing investment 
would be required to achieve this goal and he incor-
porated this thinking into the birth and growth  
of Rogers Communications. 

Building off these founding principles, Rogers delivered 
strong operational and financial results in 2018, as 
we led our industry in many financial and operational 
metrics. Under the leadership of our CEO, Joe Natale, 
our management team and all 26,000 of our employees, 
Rogers made impressive progress on its strategic plan 
and priorities, successfully balancing both short-term 
performance with long-term investments.

Our results in 2018 build on our multi-decade com-
mitment to invest for the long-term, and this approach  

4

has delivered strong and consistent long-term results 
for all shareholders. Over the past 10 years, Rogers has 
generated total shareholder returns of 178%, and the 
company’s market value has doubled over the last 9 years. 

While these strong results demonstrate the value of our 
strategy, we understand there is always more work to be 
done. We have grown to become one of Canada’s most 
trusted brands as we now reach 98% of all Canadians 
through our wireless, cable, business services, media and 
sports operations. This is a significant responsibility that 
Canadians entrust us to manage thoughtfully and is a 
relationship we will continue to invest in and respect. 

In 2018, our markets remained highly competitive across 
all of our businesses. While many of our businesses 
continue to undergo change, we are well positioned to 
embrace those changes and deliver leading next gener-
ation content, networks and products to our customers. 

In Wireless, we remained Canada’s largest provider with 
more than 10.7 million subscribers. In 2018 we delivered 
industry leading revenue and profitability growth, 
improved customer loyalty, and continued to make the 

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT     
 
“ I have full confidence in our management team to continue 
to make the Rogers organization better every day.”

key investments required to build one of the fastest and 
most secure 5G networks in the world. Going forward, 
we are committed to making significant investments in 
this business to improve customer service and ensure 
Canadians have access to the most powerful, secure  
and reliable networks.

Rogers is strong and well positioned for the future. I have 
full confidence in our management team to continue to 
make the Rogers organization better every day. We will 
work hard to earn our position as leaders in our industry, 
in our country and in our communities as we make the 
ongoing investments to enrich the lives of Canadians.

I want to thank the Rogers board of directors for their 
contributions and confidence. With their leadership we 
have strengthened our Board governance and practices. 
They bring a tremendous amount of experience and 
ability to our Board and its subcommittees and their 
counsel has been invaluable. 

Finally, I also want to thank our shareholders for your 
support of Rogers. We are an energized and enthusiastic 
organization looking forward to continuing to invest, 
compete and serve our customers in this growing, 
changing and exciting media and communications 
industry in the coming years.

Edward S. Rogers
Chair of the Board
Rogers Communications Inc.

In our Cable business we have made investments to 
bring our customers the most innovative and forward-
looking television experience available anywhere with  
the launch last year of Ignite TV. Today, we provide the 
fastest and most reliable Internet speeds across our 
entire cable footprint, which has been achieved by the 
multi-decade investments we have committed.  

Rogers has also established a terrific mix of assets in 
sports and media. Today we are the national leader in 
sports, local radio, publishing, home shopping and TV 
programming. This mix positions us well for the future, 
as these industries continue to adapt to the changing 
viewing and listening preferences of Canadians. 

Like the coast-to-coast fans that proudly cheer on our 
teams in person or through our broadcasts, we are 
very proud of Rogers’ national sports presence and the 
contribution it makes to Canada’s cultural fabric. We have 
the country’s only national baseball team in the Toronto 
Blue Jays. We have co-ownership in the country’s only 
national basketball team in the Raptors, and we exclu-
sively manage the NHL national broadcast rights to 
Canada’s national pastime. We are thrilled to offer these 
cherished assets to Canadians and will continue to invest 
in these entities for the enjoyment of future generations.

5

2018 ANNUAL REPORT   ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.A MESSAGE
FROM JOE

Joe Natale
President and CEO
Rogers Communications Inc.

Dear Shareholders,

I believe we play a meaningful role in the lives of 
Canadians each and every day. At the heart of it,  
we connect people, businesses and communities  
to each other, and to the world around them. 

investing to be at the centre of this opportunity. We are
making the right investments to bring this world to 
Canadians. I am incredibly proud of our team and their 
efforts to make this possible for our customers.

Consumers and businesses rely on our technology 
services now, more than ever. To us, it is more than 
watching a movie, exploring the web or messaging  
each other. We want the promise of technology to  
deliver a world of possibilities – stronger human 
connections, healthier lives, growth and prosperity, 
memorable experiences – to unleash all it has to offer 
society. This is a significant responsibility and it is one  
we deliver with tremendous pride and passion.

We are in the very early stages of the modern digital  
age. As a country, we are on the cusp of the next major 
phase of innovation and investment. Soon, 5G will usher 
in solutions and capabilities that are as typical as the  
4G services we enjoy today – services that arrived with 
great promise only a few short years ago, and now play  
a central role in our everyday life. At Rogers, we are 

2018 accomplishments
The right team and culture is the critical foundation 
to building a high-performing company. From my 
perspective, we have one of the best teams in our  
industry globally. In 2018, we achieved global best- 
in-class employee engagement and we were named  
one of Canada’s Top 100 Employers.

Our team’s #1 priority is putting our customers first in
everything we do. Our customer-first mindset is perme-
ating the hearts and minds of our team and it is starting 
to show up in our performance. Last year, we delivered 
our best Wireless customer loyalty in 10 years. We saw 
substantial improvements in customer adoption of our 
web and mobile apps. Most importantly, we listened 
carefully to our customers’ feedback and introduced 
hundreds of service improvements.

6

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT     
 
 
 
We began our journey to bring Canadians the Con-
nected Home of the future with the launch of Ignite TV. 
Our world-class Internet platform and our Connected 
Home roadmap will continue to be sources of compe-
titive advantage as we enable Canadians with this 
powerful set of solutions.

We made strategic investments in our networks and 
technology, the lifeblood of our business. We upgraded 
our 4G network to make it 5G-ready, announcing  
a key strategic partnership with Ericsson, the 5G  
partner of choice. Our investments allow us to deliver 
the right customer experiences today, and the right 
capabilities tomorrow.

We delivered on our financial guidance, generating  
the best financial and subscriber performance in almost 
a decade. We grew total revenue by 5% and adjusted 
EBITDA by 9%. We grew after-tax free cash flow by 5% 
while investing $2.8 billion in capital and returning $988 
million to shareholders. These results were reflected in 
our total shareholder return of 12.5%. We are incredibly 
proud of these results and their ability to fuel future 
investment and growth.

As a proud Canadian company, we made substantive 
contributions to our country – investing $2.8 billion in 
infrastructure, paying $1.1 billion in taxes and fees, and 
devoting $679 million to produce Canadian content.  

We made meaningful contributions to communities 
across the country, improving and enriching the lives  

of Canadians. We are extremely proud of our volunteer-
ing, community grants and Ted Rogers Scholarship Fund.
Overall, we contributed over $60 million to 1,900 chari-
ties across Canada, awarded 313 scholarships, and 
volunteered 20,000 hours. 

“ Our team’s #1 priority  
is putting our customers  
first in everything we do.”

Looking ahead
As I look to the future, we remain committed to becoming 
a world-class technology company. A company relent-
lessly focused on growing our core business, investing in 
our future and delivering a strong return to shareholders. 
We are on a journey to becoming one of the best brands 
in Canada; to becoming one of the best places to work; 
and to becoming a company Canadians choose first. 

It is an incredibly exciting time for our industry and  
our company. Working together, we will build on Ted’s 
legacy and write the next chapter in Rogers history.

I am immensely proud of our team and I am excited 
about our future and how we will make more possible  
for Canadians.

My very best,
Joe 

7

2018 ANNUAL REPORT   ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.  
 
 
 
 
 
A Year in Review

Create best-in-class customer 
experiences by putting our 
customers first in everything  
we do.

 · Delivered the best Wireless customer loyalty  

result in ten years

 ·

Improved customer self-serve and grew  

customer digital adoption

 · Hired an additional 1,000 team members  

to support our customers

8

Deliver innovative solutions  
and compelling content that  
our customers will love.

 ·

Introduced Ignite TV across our Ontario  

cable footprint

 ·

Invested $679 million to produce meaningful 

Canadian content

 · Celebrated 50 years of local programming  

through Rogers TV 

Invest in our networks and 
technology to deliver leading 
performance and reliability.

 ·

Invested to deliver advanced LTE capabilities  

to Canadians

 ·

Signed a strategic partnership with Ericsson,  

the 5G partner of choice

 · Received the 2018 Speedtest® Award  

for Canada’s Fastest Internet from Ookla®

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT    Be a strong, socially responsible 
leader in our communities  
across Canada.

 · Contributed over $60 million through cash and 

in-kind investments to help our communities 

thrive

 ·

Expanded our Connected for Success  

affordable Internet program to 300 non-profit 

housing providers

 · Volunteered over 20,000 hours to local charities  

across the country

 Drive profitable growth in all  
the markets we serve.

 · Achieved 2018 guidance targets, and raised 

adjusted EBITDA guidance in the third quarter

 · Grew total revenue by 5% and adjusted  

EBITDA by 9%

 · Delivered total shareholder return of 12.5%,  

21 points above the TSX Composite Index

Develop our people and a high 
performance culture.

 · Achieved best-in-class employee  

engagement score 

 · Recognized as one of  Canada’s Top 100 

Employers and a Top Employer for  

Young People

 ·

Invested $43 million in developing  

our employees

9

2018 ANNUAL REPORT   ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.Senior Executive 
Officers

1

6

2

7

3

8

4

9

5

10

1.  Joe Natale 

President and  
Chief Executive Officer  

2.  Rick Brace 

President, Media  

3.  Lisa Durocher 

Chief Digital Officer 

4.  Jorge Fernandes 

Chief Technology and  
Information Officer 

5.  Phil Hartling 

President, Residential

6.  Brent Johnston 

President, Wireless 

7.  Graeme McPhail 

Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer 
and Secretary 

8.  Dean Prevost 

President, Rogers for Business

9.  Jim Reid 

Chief Human Resources Officer

10.  Tony Staffieri, FCPA, FCA 

Chief Financial Officer

10

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT    Directors

1

6

2

7

3

8

4

9

5

10

11

12

13

14

15

1.  Edward S. Rogers 

Chair 

2. 

 John H. Clappison, FCPA, FCA 
Lead Director 

3.  Bonnie R. Brooks, CM 
Company Director 

4.  Robert K. Burgess 
Company Director 

5.  Robert Dépatie 

Company Director 

6.  Robert J. Gemmell 
Company Director 

7.  Alan D. Horn, CPA, CA 

12.   The Hon. David R. Peterson, PC, QC 

President and Chief 
Executive Officer, Rogers 
Telecommunications Limited 

Chairman Emeritus 
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 

13.  Loretta A. Rogers 
Company Director 

14.   Martha L. Rogers 

Company Director 

15.   Melinda M. Rogers 
Deputy Chair 

8.  Philip B. Lind, CM 

Vice Chair 

9.  John A. MacDonald 

Company Director 

10.  Isabelle Marcoux 

Chair, Transcontinental Inc. 

11.   Joe Natale 

President and  
Chief Executive Officer 

11

2018 ANNUAL REPORT   ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Financial Report

13 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

46 Managing Our Liquidity and Financial Resources

46
Sources and Uses of Cash
49
Financial Condition
Financial Risk Management
50
54 Dividends and Share Information
55 Commitments and Contractual Obligations
55 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

56 Governance and Risk Management

Social Responsibility
Income Tax and Other Government Payments

56 Governance at Rogers
57
58
59 Risk Management
60 Risks and Uncertainties Affecting Our Business
67 Controls and Procedures

68 Regulation In Our Industry

70 Wireless
72 Cable
74 Media

75 Other Information

Key Performance Indicators

75 Accounting Policies
82
84 Non-GAAP Measures
86

Summary of Financial Results of Long-Term Debt
Guarantor
Five-Year Summary of Consolidated Financial Results

87

15 Executive Summary
15 About Rogers
15
17

2018 Highlights
Financial Highlights

18 Understanding Our Business

Products and Services

18
20 Competition
21

Industry Trends

23 Our Strategy, Key Performance Drivers, and Strategic

Highlights
23 Our Strategic Priorities
2018 Objectives
24
Key Performance Drivers and 2018 Strategic Highlights
24
2019 Objectives
26
Financial and Operating Guidance
27

28 Capability to Deliver Results

Leading Networks
Powerful Brands

28
30
30 Widespread Product Distribution
30
First-Class Media Content
30 Customer Experience
Engaged People
31
31
Financial Strength and Flexibility
31 Healthy Trading Volumes and Dividends

32 2018 Financial Results

32
33

Summary of Consolidated Results
Key Changes in Financial Results This Year Compared to
2017
34 Wireless
35 Cable
37 Media
38 Capital Expenditures
39 Review of Consolidated Performance
42 Quarterly Results
45 Overview of Financial Position

12

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Management’s Discussion and Analysis
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) contains
important information about our business and our performance for
the year ended December 31, 2018. This MD&A should be read in
conjunction with our 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

All dollar amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.
All percentage changes are calculated using the rounded numbers
as they appear in the tables. This MD&A is current as at March 6,
2019 and was approved by RCI’s Board of Directors (the Board).
This MD&A includes forward-looking statements and assumptions.
See “About Forward-Looking Information” for more information.

We, us, our, Rogers, Rogers Communications, and the Company
refer to Rogers Communications Inc. and its subsidiaries. RCI refers
to the legal entity Rogers Communications Inc., not including its
subsidiaries. Rogers also holds interests in various investments and
ventures.

We are publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: RCI.A
and RCI.B) and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: RCI).

In this MD&A, the first quarter refers to the three months ended
March 31, 2018, the second quarter refers to the three months
ended June 30, 2018, the third quarter refers to the three months
ended September 30, 2018, the fourth quarter refers to the three
months ended December 31, 2018, this year refers to the twelve
months ended December 31, 2018, and last year refers to the
twelve months ended December 31, 2017. All results commentary
is compared to the equivalent periods in 2017 or as at
December 31, 2017, as applicable, unless otherwise indicated.

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted new accounting standards
that are discussed in “Accounting Policies” in this MD&A. The
adoption of
IFRS 15, Revenue from contracts with customers
(IFRS 15) had a significant effect on our reported results in our
Wireless segment. Affected 2017 amounts presented in this MD&A
have been restated in accordance with IFRS 15.

Effective January 1, 2018, we redefined our reportable segments
and commenced using adjusted EBITDA as our key measure of
profit. Affected 2017 amounts presented in this MD&A have been
restated. See “Understanding Our Business” for more information.

ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This MD&A includes “forward-looking information” and “forward-
looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities
laws (collectively, “forward-looking information”), and assumptions
about, among other things, our business, operations, and financial
performance and condition approved by our management on the
date of this MD&A. This forward-looking information and these
assumptions include, but are not limited to, statements about our
objectives and strategies to achieve those objectives, and about
our beliefs, plans, expectations, anticipations, estimates, or
intentions.

Forward-looking information:
• typically includes words like could, expect, may, anticipate,
assume, believe,
intend, estimate, plan, project, guidance,
outlook, target, and similar expressions, although not all forward-
looking information includes them;

• includes conclusions, forecasts, and projections that are based
on our current objectives and strategies and on estimates,
expectations, assumptions, and other factors, most of which are
confidential and proprietary and that we believe to have been
reasonable at the time they were applied but may prove to be
incorrect; and

• was approved by our management on the date of this MD&A.

Our forward-looking information includes forecasts and projections
related to the following items, some of which are non-GAAP
measures (see “Non-GAAP Measures”), among others:
• revenue;
• total service revenue;
• adjusted EBITDA;
• capital expenditures;
• cash income tax payments;
• free cash flow;
• dividend payments;
• the growth of new products and services;
• expected growth in subscribers and the services to which they

subscribe;

• the cost of acquiring and retaining subscribers and deployment

of new services;

• continued cost reductions and efficiency improvements;
• traction against our debt leverage ratio; and
• all other statements that are not historical facts.

Specific forward-looking information included or incorporated in
this document includes, but is not limited to, our information and
statements under “Financial and Operating Guidance” relating to
our 2019 consolidated guidance on revenue, adjusted EBITDA,
capital expenditures, and free cash flow. All other statements that
are not historical facts are forward-looking statements.

We base our conclusions, forecasts, and projections (including the
aforementioned guidance) on the following factors, among others:
• general economic and industry growth rates;
• currency exchange rates and interest rates;
• product pricing levels and competitive intensity;
• subscriber growth;
• pricing, usage, and churn rates;
• changes in government regulation;
• technology deployment;
• availability of devices;
• timing of new product launches;
• content and equipment costs;
• the integration of acquisitions; and
• industry structure and stability.

Except as otherwise indicated, this MD&A and our forward-looking
information do not reflect the potential impact of any non-recurring
or other special
items or of any dispositions, monetizations,
mergers, acquisitions, other business combinations, or other

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

13

 
 
 
and caution them that it would be unreasonable to rely on such
statements as creating legal rights regarding our future results or
plans. We are under no obligation (and we expressly disclaim any
such obligation) to update or alter any statements containing
forward-looking information or
the factors or assumptions
underlying them, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise, except as required by law. All of the forward-
looking information in this MD&A is qualified by the cautionary
statements herein.

BEFORE MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION
Before making any investment decisions and for a detailed
discussion of the risks, uncertainties, and environment associated
with our business, fully review the sections in this MD&A entitled
Industry” and “Governance and Risk
“Regulation In Our
Management”, as well as our various other filings with Canadian
and US securities regulators, which can be found at sedar.com and
sec.gov, respectively.

FOR MORE INFORMATION
You can find more information about us, including our Annual
Information Form, on our website (investors.rogers.com), on
SEDAR (sedar.com), and on EDGAR (sec.gov), or you can e-mail us
at investor.relations@rci.rogers.com. Information on or connected
to these and any other websites referenced in this document does
not constitute part of this MD&A.

You can also find information about our governance practices,
of
corporate
communications and media industry terms, and additional
information about our business at investors.rogers.com.

responsibility

a glossary

reporting,

social

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

transactions that may be considered or announced or may occur
after the date on which the statement containing the forward-
looking information is made.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Actual events and results can be substantially different from what is
expressed or implied by forward-looking information as a result of
risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond
our control, including but not limited to:
• regulatory changes;
• technological changes;
• economic conditions;
• unanticipated changes in content or equipment costs;
• changing conditions in the entertainment, information, and/or

communications industries;
• the integration of acquisitions;
• litigation and tax matters;
• the level of competitive intensity;
• the emergence of new opportunities; and
• new interpretations and new accounting standards

from

accounting standards bodies.

These factors can also affect our objectives, strategies, and
intentions. Many of these factors are beyond our control or our
current expectations or knowledge. Should one or more of these
risks, uncertainties, or other factors materialize, our objectives,
strategies, or
factors or
assumptions underlying the forward-looking information prove
incorrect, our actual results and our plans could vary significantly
from what we currently foresee.

intentions change, or any other

Accordingly, we warn investors
to exercise caution when
considering statements containing forward-looking information

14

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Executive Summary

ABOUT ROGERS

Rogers is a leading diversified Canadian communications and
media company. We are Canada’s largest provider of wireless voice
and data communications services and one of Canada’s leading
providers of cable television, high-speed Internet and telephony
services to consumers and businesses. Through Rogers Media we
are engaged in radio and television broadcasting, sports, televised
and online shopping, magazines and digital media. Our shares are
publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: RCI.A and
RCI.B) and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: RCI).

2018 HIGHLIGHTS

KEY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars, except margins and per share amounts)

Consolidated
Total revenue
Total service revenue 2
Adjusted EBITDA 3
Adjusted EBITDA margin 3

Net income
Adjusted net income 3

Basic earnings per share
Adjusted basic earnings per share 3

Capital expenditures 4
Cash provided by operating activities
Free cash flow 3

Wireless
Service revenue
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin

Cable 5
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin

Media
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA margin

Almost all of our operations and sales are in Canada. We have a
highly skilled and diversified workforce of approximately 26,100
employees. Our head office is in Toronto, Ontario and we have
numerous offices across Canada. We report our
results of
operations in three reportable segments. See “Understanding Our
Business” for more information.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Years ended December 31

2017
(restated) 1

2018

15,096
12,974
5,983
39.6%

2,059
2,241

14,369
12,550
5,502
38.3%

1,845
1,902

$ 4.00
$ 4.35

$ 3.58
$ 3.69

2,790
4,288
1,771

7,091
9,200
4,090
44.5%

3,932
1,874
47.7%

2,168
196
9.0%

2,436
3,938
1,685

6,765
8,569
3,726
43.5%

3,894
1,819
46.7%

2,153
127
5.9%

% Chg

5
3
9
1.3 pts

12
18

12
18

15
9
5

5
7
10
1.0 pts

1
3
1.0 pts

1
54
3.1 pts

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.
2 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
3 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted net income, adjusted basic earnings per share, and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered
substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other
companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we calculate them.

4 Includes additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds on disposition, but does not include expenditures for spectrum licences.
5 These figures have been retrospectively amended as a result of our reportable segment realignment. See “Understanding Our Business”.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

15

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Subscriber results (in thousands) 2
Wireless postpaid net additions
Wireless prepaid net (losses) additions
Wireless subscribers

Internet net additions 3
Internet subscribers 3

Television net losses
Television subscribers

Phone net additions
Phone subscribers

Total service unit net additions 3,4
Total service units 3,4

Additional Wireless metrics 2
Postpaid churn (monthly)
Blended ABPU (monthly)
Blended ARPU (monthly) 5

Ratios
Capital intensity 2
Dividend payout ratio of net income 2
Dividend payout ratio of free cash flow 2,6
Return on assets 2
Debt leverage ratio 6

Employee-related information
Total active employees (approximate)

As at or years ended December 31

2017
(restated) 1

2018

453
(152)
10,783

354
61
10,482

109
2,430

(55)
1,685

8
1,116

62
5,231

95
2,321

(80)
1,740

14
1,108

29
5,169

Chg

99
(213)
301

14
109

25
(55)

(6)
8

33
62

1.10%
$ 64.74
$ 55.64

1.20%
$ 62.31
$ 54.23

(0.10 pts)
2.43
1.41

$
$

18.5%
48.0%
55.8%
6.5%
2.5

17.0%
53.6%
58.6%
6.1%
2.7

1.5 pts
(5.6 pts)
(2.8 pts)
0.4 pts
(0.2)

26,100

24,500

1,600

1 Certain 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.
2 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
3 These figures have been retrospectively amended as a result of our reportable segment realignment. See “Understanding Our Business”.
4 Includes Internet, Television, and Phone subscribers.
5 Blended ARPU has been restated for 2017 using revenue recognition policies in accordance with IFRS 15.
6 Dividend payout ratio of free cash flow and debt leverage ratio are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are
not defined terms under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information
about these measures, including how we calculate them.

16

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

HIGHER NET INCOME AND ADJUSTED NET INCOME
• Net

income increased 12% primarily as a result of higher
adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by higher associated income tax
expense, higher depreciation and amortization, and higher
restructuring, acquisition and other costs. See “Review of
Consolidated Performance” for more information.

• Adjusted net income increased 18% this year as a result of
higher adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by higher depreciation
and amortization.

SUBSTANTIAL FREE CASH FLOW SUPPORTS FINANCIAL
FLEXIBILITY
• Our substantial cash flow generation enabled us to reduce
outstanding net debt, continue to make investments in our
network, and return substantial dividends to shareholders. We
paid $988 million in dividends in 2018 and announced a 4.2%
increase in our annualized dividend rate in January 2019.

• Our cash provided by operating activities increased by 9% this
year, primarily as a result of higher net income and lower income
taxes paid, partially offset by the net change in contract asset
balances. Free cash flow increased 5% this year to $1,771 million
as a result of higher adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by higher
capital expenditures.

• Our debt leverage ratio improved to 2.5 as at December 31,
2018 from 2.7 as at December 31, 2017, driven by lower
adjusted net debt and higher adjusted EBITDA.

• Our overall weighted average cost of borrowings was 4.45% as
at December 31, 2018 (2017 – 4.70%) and our overall weighted
average term to maturity on our debt was 10.7 years as at
December 31, 2018 (2017 – 9.9 years).

• We ended the year with approximately $2.4 billion of available
liquidity (2017 – $2.7 billion) including $1.6 billion available
under our bank and letter of credit facilities (2017 – $2.3 billion),
$0.4 billion (2017 – $0.4 billion) available under our $1.05 billion
accounts receivable securitization program, and $0.4 billion
(2017 - nil) in cash and cash equivalents.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

HIGHER REVENUE
• Revenue increased by 5% this year, primarily driven by Wireless

service revenue growth of 5%.

• Wireless service revenue increased largely as a result of our
balanced approach to continue monetizing the increasing
demand for data along with a disciplined approach around
subscriber base management.

• Cable revenue increased marginally as a result of

the 7%
increase in Internet revenue, due to the general movement of
customers to higher speed and usage tiers, the impact of
Internet service pricing changes, and a larger subscriber base.
The increase was partially offset by lower Television and Phone
revenue, primarily due to Television subscriber losses over the
past year and the impact of promotional pricing provided to
subscribers. We continue to see an ongoing shift in product mix
to higher-margin Internet services, with 60% of our residential
Internet base at the end of 2018 on plans with download speeds
of 100 megabits per second or higher compared to 54% at the
end of last year.

• Media revenue increased marginally as a result of higher revenue
at the Toronto Blue Jays, primarily due to a distribution from
Major League Baseball, and higher network subscription
revenue, partially offset by lower overall advertising revenue.

HIGHER ADJUSTED EBITDA
• Adjusted EBITDA increased 9% this year, with a consolidated
adjusted EBITDA margin of 39.6%, an expansion of 130 basis
points. This increase was primarily driven by Wireless, with a
100 basis point expansion to 44.5%, and Cable, with a 100 basis
point expansion to 47.7%.

• Wireless adjusted EBITDA increased 10% this year as a result of
strong flow-through of the service revenue growth described
above, partially offset by higher expenditures associated with
increased subscriber volumes and costs of devices.

• Cable adjusted EBITDA increased 3% this year as a result of
strong Internet revenue growth, the ongoing product mix shift to
higher-margin Internet services, and various cost efficiencies.
• Media adjusted EBITDA increased 54% this year primarily as a
result of
increased revenue as discussed above and lower
operating expenses from improvements made to our cost
structure across the divisions, which led to a margin of 9.0%, up
310 basis points from last year.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

17

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Understanding Our Business

Rogers is a leading diversified Canadian communications and
media company.

THREE REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
We report our results of operations in three reportable segments.
Each segment and the nature of its business are as follows:

Segment

Wireless

Cable

Media

Principal activities

Wireless telecommunications operations
for Canadian consumers and businesses.

Cable telecommunications operations,
including Internet, television, telephony
(phone), and smart home monitoring
services for Canadian consumers and
businesses, and network connectivity
through our fibre network and data centre
assets to support a range of voice, data,
networking, hosting, and cloud-based
services for the enterprise, public sector,
and carrier wholesale markets.

A diversified portfolio of media
properties, including sports media and
entertainment, television and radio
broadcasting, specialty channels, multi-
platform shopping, digital media, and
publishing.

See “Capability to Deliver Results” for more information about our
extensive wireless and cable networks and significant wireless
spectrum position.

Wireless and Cable are operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary,
Rogers Communications Canada Inc. (RCCI), and certain of our
other wholly-owned subsidiaries. Media is operated by our wholly-
owned subsidiary, Rogers Media Inc., and its subsidiaries.

Effective January 1, 2018, we redefined our reportable segments as
a result of technological evolution and the increased overlap
between the various product offerings within our legacy Cable and
legacy Business Solutions reportable segments, as well as how we
allocate resources amongst, and the general management of, our
reportable segments. The results of our legacy Cable segment,
legacy Business Solutions segment, and our Smart Home
Monitoring products are presented within a redefined Cable
segment. Financial results related to our Smart Home Monitoring
products were previously reported within Corporate items and
intercompany eliminations. We have retrospectively amended our
2017 comparative segment results to account for this redefinition.

Additionally, effective January 1, 2018, we commenced using
adjusted EBITDA as the key measure of profit for the purpose of
assessing performance for each segment and to make decisions
about the allocation of resources. This measure replaced our
previous adjusted operating profit non-GAAP measure. We believe
adjusted EBITDA more fully reflects segment and consolidated
profitability. The difference between adjusted operating profit and
adjusted EBITDA is that adjusted EBITDA includes stock-based
compensation expense. Use of
this measure changed our
definition of free cash flow. Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are

non-GAAP measures and should not be considered substitutes or
alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under
IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable
way to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP
Measures” for information about these measures, including how
we calculate them.

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

WIRELESS
Rogers is a Canadian leader in delivering a range of innovative
wireless network technologies and services. Our postpaid and
prepaid wireless services are offered under the Rogers, Fido, and
chatr brands, and provide consumers and businesses with the latest
wireless devices, services, and applications including:
• mobile and fixed high-speed Internet access;
• wireless voice and enhanced voice features;
• wireless home phone;
• device protection;
• text messaging;
• e-mail;
• global voice and data roaming, including Roam Like Home and

Fido Roam;

• bridging landline phones with wireless phones through products

like Rogers Unison;

• machine-to-machine solutions and Internet of Things (IoT)

solutions; and

• advanced wireless solutions for businesses.

CABLE
Our cable network provides an innovative and leading selection of
high-speed broadband Internet access, digital television and online
viewing, phone, and advanced home Wi-Fi services to consumers
in Ontario, New Brunswick, and on the island of Newfoundland. We
also provide services to businesses and enterprises across Canada
that aim to meet the increasing needs of today’s critical business
applications.
In 2018, we launched our new all-IP television
product, Ignite TV, to our entire Ontario Cable footprint. Ignite TV,
which is licensed from Comcast Corporation (Comcast), delivers a
high-value, premium service with advanced features and video
experiences and is the foundation to a robust product roadmap of
innovation leading to a truly connected home service.

We intend to adopt Comcast’s new Digital Home solution as a first
step on our innovation roadmap. This whole-home networking
solution will provide customers with a simple, fast, and intuitive way
to control and manage their connected devices. The cloud-based
platform will link to the new Data Over Cable Service Interface
Specifications (DOCSIS) 3.1 Wi-Fi gateway devices to deliver fast,
reliable connectivity in the home and will allow customers to easily
add and control devices, pair Wi-Fi extenders that boost signal
strength, and use voice controls to see who is on the network, all in
a safe and secure manner.

Internet services include:
• Internet access (including basic and unlimited usage packages),

security solutions, and e-mail;

• access speeds of up to one gigabit per second (Gbps), covering

our entire Cable footprint;

18

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

• Rogers Ignite and Fido Internet unlimited packages, combining
fast and reliable speeds with the freedom of unlimited usage
and options for self-installation; and

• Rogers Smart Home Monitoring, offering services such as
monitoring, security, automation, energy efficiency, and smart
control through a smartphone app.

Television services include:
• local and network TV, made available through traditional digital
or IP-based Ignite TV, including starter and premium channel
packages along with à la carte channels;

• on-demand television;
• cloud-based digital video recorders (DVRs) available with Ignite

TV services;

• voice-activated remote controls, restart features, and integrated

apps such as YouTube and Netflix on Ignite TV;

Our NHL Agreement, which runs through the 2025-2026 NHL
season, allows us to deliver unprecedented coverage of professional
hockey, with more than 1,200 regular season games per season
streamed across television, smartphones, tablets, and the Internet,
both through traditional streaming services as well as Rogers NHL
LIVE (formerly Rogers NHL GameCentre LIVE). It also grants Rogers
national rights on those platforms to the Stanley Cup Playoffs and
Stanley Cup Final, all NHL-related special events and non-game
events (such as the NHL All-Star Game and the NHL Draft), rights to
sublicense broadcasting rights to Groupe TVA and the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), and rights to use the Hockey Night
In Canada brand through a sublicense agreement.

In Television, we operate several conventional and specialty
television networks:
• Sportsnet’s four regional stations along with Sportsnet ONE,

• personal video recorders (PVRs), including Whole Home PVR

Sportsnet 360, and Sportsnet World;

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

and 4K PVR capabilities;

• Download and Go, the ability to download recorded programs
onto your smartphone or tablet to watch at a later time using the
Ignite TV app;

• linear and time-shifted programming;
• digital specialty channels;
• 4K television programming, including regular season Toronto
Blue Jays home games and select marquee National Hockey
League (NHL) and National Basketball Association (NBA) games;
and

• televised content delivered on smartphones,

tablets, and
personal computers through the Ignite TV or Rogers Anyplace
TV apps.

Phone services include:
• residential and small business local telephony service; and
• calling features such as voicemail, call waiting, and long distance.

Enterprise services include:
• voice, data networking,

Internet protocol

(IP), and Ethernet
services over multi-service customer access devices that allow
customers to scale and add services, such as private networking,
Internet, IP voice, and cloud solutions, which blend seamlessly to
grow with their business requirements;

• optical wave,

Internet, Ethernet, and multi-protocol

label
switching services, providing scalable and secure metro and
wide area private networking that enables and interconnects
critical business applications for businesses that have one or
many offices, data centres, or points of presence (as well as
cloud applications) across Canada;

• simplified information technology (IT) and network technologies
with security-embedded, cloud-based, professionally-managed
solutions; and

• extensive wireless and cable access networks services for primary,

bridging, and back-up connectivity.

MEDIA
Our portfolio of Media assets reaches Canadians from coast to
coast.

In Sports Media and Entertainment, we own the Toronto Blue Jays,
Canada’s only Major League Baseball (MLB) team, and the Rogers
Centre event venue, which hosts the Toronto Blue Jays’ home
games, concerts, trade shows, and special events.

• City network, which,

together with affiliated stations, has
broadcast distribution to approximately 83% of Canadian
individuals;

• OMNI multicultural broadcast

including
OMNI Regional, which provide multilingual newscasts nationally
to all digital basic television subscribers;

television stations,

• specialty channels that include FX (Canada), FXX (Canada), and

Outdoor Life Network (OLN); and

• TSC, Canada’s only nationally televised shopping channel, which
generates a significant and growing portion of its revenue from
online sales.

In Radio, we operate 55 AM and FM radio stations in markets
across Canada, including popular radio brands such as 98.1 CHFI,
680 NEWS, Sportsnet The FAN, KiSS, JACK FM, and SONiC.

We also offer a range of digital services and products, including:
• our digital sports-related assets,

including Rogers NHL LIVE,

Sportsnet NOW, and Sportsnet NOW+;
• many well-known consumer brands,

such as Maclean’s,

Chatelaine, Today’s Parent, and Hello! Canada; and

• a range of other websites, apps, podcasts, and digital products

associated with our various brands and businesses.

OTHER
We offer the Rogers World Elite Mastercard, Rogers Platinum
Mastercard, and the Fido Mastercard, credit cards that allow
customers to earn cashback rewards points on credit card
spending.

in a number of associates and joint

OTHER INVESTMENTS
We hold interests
arrangements, some of which include:
• our 37.5% ownership interest

in Maple Leaf Sports &
Entertainment Ltd. (MLSE), which owns the Toronto Maple Leafs,
the Toronto Raptors, Toronto FC, the Toronto Argonauts, and
the Toronto Marlies, as well as various associated real estate
holdings; and

• our 50% ownership interest in Glentel

Inc. (Glentel), a large
provider of multicarrier wireless and wireline products and
services with several hundred Canadian retail distribution outlets.

We also hold a number of interests in marketable securities of
publicly traded companies, including Cogeco Inc. and Cogeco
Communications Inc.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

19

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

COMPETITION

Competition in the telecommunications industry continues to
intensify, with national,
regional, and reseller players giving
consumers a broader choice in service providers and plan offerings.
This puts downward pressure on pricing, potentially reducing profit
margins, and could also affect our subscriber churn.

Traditional wireline telephony and television services are now
offered over the Internet. This has allowed more non-traditional
providers to enter the market and has changed how traditional
providers compete. This is changing the mix of packages and
pricing that service providers offer and could affect churn levels.

In the media industry, there continues to be a shift towards digital
and online media consumption; advertisers are directing more
advertising dollars to those media channels. In addition, we now
compete with a range of digital and online media companies,
including large global companies.

WIRELESS
We compete on customer experience, price, quality of service,
scope of services, network coverage, sophistication of wireless
technology, breadth of distribution, selection of devices, and
branding and positioning.
• Wireless technology – our extensive long-term evolution (LTE)
network caters to customers seeking the increased capacity and
speed it provides. We compete with BCE Inc. (Bell), TELUS
(Shaw),
Corporation (Telus), Shaw Communications
Inc.
Videotron, SaskTel, and Eastlink Inc.
(Eastlink), all of whom
operate LTE networks. We also compete with these providers on
high-speed packet access (HSPA) and global system for mobile
communications (GSM) networks and with providers that use
alternative wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi “hotspots” and
mobile virtual network operators (MVNO), such as Primus.

• Product, branding, and pricing – we compete nationally with Bell,
Telus, and Shaw, including their flanker brands Virgin Mobile
(Bell), Lucky Mobile (Bell), Koodo (Telus), Public Mobile (Telus),
and Freedom Mobile (Shaw). We also compete with various
regional players and resellers.

• Distribution of services and devices – we compete with other
service providers for dealers, prime locations for our own stores,
and third-party retail distribution shelf space.

• Wireless networks – consolidation amongst regional players, or
with incumbent carriers, could alter the regional or national
competitive landscapes for Wireless.

• Inbound roaming – we compete with other major national
carriers to provide service to international operators who have
customers who roam while in Canada.

• Spectrum – Innovation, Science and Economic Development
Canada (ISED Canada) has announced a 600 MHz spectrum
licence auction, to take place in March 2019, and future high-
frequency spectrum licence auctions in the next one to two

20

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

years. The outcome of these auctions may increase competition.
See “Regulation In Our Industry” for more information.

CABLE
Internet
We compete with other Internet service providers (ISPs) that offer
residential high-speed Internet access services. Rogers and Fido
high-speed Internet services compete directly with, among others:
• Bell and Bell Aliant’s Internet services in Ontario, New Brunswick,

and on the island of Newfoundland; and

• various resellers using wholesale telecommunication company
digital subscriber line (DSL) and cable Third-Party Internet Access
(TPIA) services in local markets.

A number of different players in the Canadian market also
compete for enterprise network and communications services.
There are relatively few national providers, but each market has
its own competitors that usually focus on the geographic areas
where they have the most extensive networks. In the enterprise
market, we compete with facilities- and non-facilities-based
telecommunications service providers. In markets where we own
network infrastructure, we compete with incumbent fibre-based
providers. Our main competitors are as follows:
• Ontario – Bell, Cogeco Data Services, and Zayo;
• Quebec – Bell, Telus, and Videotron;
• Atlantic Canada – Bell Aliant and Eastlink; and
• Western Canada – Shaw and Telus.

Television
We compete with:
• other

Canadian multi-channel

distribution
undertakings (BDUs), including Bell, Shaw, and other satellite
and IPTV providers;

broadcast

• over-the-top (OTT) video offerings through providers like Netflix,
YouTube, Hulu, Apple, Amazon Prime Video, Crave, Google,
and other channels streaming their own content; and

• over-the-air

local and regional broadcast

television signals
received directly through antennas, the illegal distribution of
Canadian and international channels via video streaming boxes,
and the illegal reception of US direct broadcast satellite services.

Phone
We compete with:
• Bell and Bell Aliant’s wireline phone service in Ontario, New

Brunswick, and on the island of Newfoundland;

• incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) local loop resellers and
voice over IP (VoIP) service providers (such as Primus and
Comwave), other VoIP-only service providers (such as Vonage
and Skype), and other voice applications riding over the Internet
access services of ISPs; and

• substitution of wireline for wireless products, including mobile

phones and wireless home phone products.

MEDIA
Competition in Sports Media and Entertainment includes other:
• televised and online sports broadcasters;
• Toronto professional teams, for attendance at Toronto Blue Jays

games;

• MLB teams, for Toronto Blue Jays players and fans;
• local sporting and special event venues;
• professional sports teams, for merchandise sales revenue; and
• new digital sports media companies.

Television and specialty services compete for
advertisers with:
• other Canadian television stations that broadcast in their local
markets, including those owned and operated by the CBC, Bell
Media, and Corus Entertainment;

viewers and

• other specialty channels;
• distant Canadian signals and US border stations, given the time-

shifting capability available to subscribers;

• other media,

including newspapers, magazines,

radio, and

outdoor advertising; and

• content available on the Internet, such as web-based streaming

services.

Our radio stations compete mainly with individual stations in local
markets, but they also compete with:
• other large, national radio operators, including the CBC, Bell
Media, Corus Entertainment, and satellite radio operator
SiriusXM;

• broadcast and Internet radio platforms, such as iHeartRadio,
which combine free, on-demand music services with the
availability of live radio broadcasts and podcasts;

• iTunes Music, Spotify, Radioplayer Canada, and comparable
apps, which allow free or paid music and radio streaming directly
from users’ smartphones;

• other media, including newspapers, magazines, television, and

outdoor advertising; and

• new technologies, such as online web information services,
digital assistants, music downloading, and portable media
players.

TSC competes with:
• retail stores;
• Internet, catalogue, and direct mail retailers;
• infomercials that sell products on television; and
• other

television channels,

for channel placement,

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

INDUSTRY TRENDS

The telecommunications industry in Canada and our reporting
segments are affected by various overarching trends relating to
changing technologies, consumer demands, economic conditions,
and regulatory developments. See “Risks and Uncertainties
Affecting Our Business” and “Regulation In Our Industry” for more
information. Below is a summary of the industry trends affecting our
specific reportable segments.

WIRELESS TRENDS
More sophisticated wireless networks and devices and the rise of
multimedia and Internet-based applications are making it easier
and faster to receive data, driving growth in wireless data services.
Consumer demand for mobile devices, digital media, and
on-demand content is pushing providers to build networks that can
support
the expanded use of applications, mobile video,
messaging, and other wireless data. Mobile commerce continues
to increase as more devices and platforms adopt secure
technology to facilitate wireless transactions.

Wireless providers are investing in the next generation of
broadband wireless data networks, such as Licensed Assisted
Access, 4.5G, and future 5G technologies, to support the growing
data demand and new products and applications.

Wireless market penetration in Canada is approximately 87% of the
population and is expected to continue growing, per International
Data Corporation’s August 2018 Market Forecast Report.

and

Radio-television

Telecommunications
The Canadian
Commission (CRTC) Wireless Code has limited consumer wireless
term contracts to two years from three years, which has resulted in a
greater number of customers completing and renewing contracts
at any given time. Shorter-term contracts allow less time for carriers
to recover subsidies.

Subscribers are increasingly bringing their own devices or keeping
their existing devices longer and therefore may not enter into term
contracts for wireless services. This may negatively impact our
subscriber churn, but may create gross addition subscriber
opportunities as a result of increased churn from other carriers. This
also may negatively impact the monthly service fees charged to
subscribers.

Wireless providers are collaborating with OTT services to offer their
customers unique, value-added benefits and service options.

viewer

attention, and loyalty.

Our digital media and publishing products compete for readership
and advertisers with:
• other Canadian magazines, both digital and printed;
• foreign, mostly US, titles that sell directly into Canada, both

digital and printed;

• online information and entertainment websites and apps,
including digital news services, streaming services, and content
available via social networking services; and
• other traditional media, such as TV and radio.

CABLE TRENDS
Technology advancement, non-traditional competitors, consumer
behaviours, and regulatory advancement are key areas influencing
Cable. The Internet and social media are increasingly being used as
a substitute for wireline telephone services, and televised content is
increasingly available online. Downward Television tier migration
(cord shaving) and Television cancellation with the intent of
substitution (cord cutting) appear to be on the rise with increased
adoption of OTT services, such as Apple TV, Netflix, and Android-
based TV boxes. The CRTC’s decision to lower wholesale Internet
access rates may also adversely affect companies that wholesale
Internet services.

Broadcast television technology continues to improve with 4K TV
broadcasts, and high dynamic range (HDR) for higher resolution
and improved video image colour and saturation.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

21

 
 
 
Our enterprise customers are using third parties to increase security
for their data and information to address cyber threats and other
information security risks.

Devices and machines are becoming more interconnected and
there is more reliance on the Internet and other networks to
facilitate updates and track usage.

MEDIA TRENDS
Access to live sports and other premium content has become even
more important for acquiring and retaining audiences that in turn
attract advertisers and subscribers. Therefore, ownership of content
and/or
long-term agreements with content owners has also
become increasingly important to media companies. Leagues,
teams, networks, and new digital entrants are also experimenting
with the delivery of live sports content through online, social, and
virtual platforms, while non-traditional sports are also growing in
mindshare.

Consumer demand for digital media, mobile devices, and
on-demand content is increasing and media products, such as
magazines, have experienced significant digital uptake, requiring
industry players to increase their efforts in digital content and
capabilities in order
to compete. This trend is also causing
advertisers to shift their spending from conventional TV and print
publishing to digital platforms.

Competition has changed and traditional media assets in Canada
are increasingly being controlled by a small number of competitors
with significant scale and financial resources in order to compete
with digital competitive factors. Technology has allowed new
entrants and even individuals to become media players in their own
right.

Some players have become more vertically integrated across both
traditional and emerging platforms. Relationships between
providers and purchasers of content have become more complex.
Global aggregators have also emerged and are competing for
both content and viewers.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The CRTC Basic Telecommunications Services decision established
several criteria to improve Internet access for Canadian residents
and businesses. As a result, the CRTC believes fixed broadband
subscribers should have access to speeds of at least 50 Mbps
download and 10 Mbps upload, and access to a service with an
unlimited data allowance.

The CRTC is considering creating a new code of conduct for
Internet services in order to establish guidelines for consumer
interactions with their ISPs.

Our digital cable and VoIP telephony services compete with
competitor
IPTV deployments and non-facilities-based service
providers, respectively, which continue to increase competitive
intensity that have and may continue to negatively impact the
industry.

Cable and wireline companies are expanding their service offerings
to include faster broadband Internet. Canadian companies,
including Rogers, are increasingly offering download speeds of
1 Gbps and Internet offerings with unlimited bandwidth.
Consumers are demanding ever-faster speeds for streaming online
media, playing online video games, and for their ever-growing
number of connected devices.
In order to help facilitate these
speeds, cable and wireline companies are shifting their networks
and
towards
fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) technologies. These technologies provide
faster potential data
than earlier
technologies, allowing both television and Internet signals to reach
consumers more quickly in order to sustain reliable speeds to
address the increasing number of Internet-capable devices.

speed and capacity DOCSIS

communication speeds

higher

3.1

Our enterprise customers use fibre-based access and cloud
computing to capture and share information in more secure and
accessible environments. This, combined with the rise of
multimedia and Internet-based business applications,
is driving
exponential growth in data demand.

Enterprises and all
levels of government are transforming data
centre infrastructure by moving toward virtual data storage and
hosting. This is driving demand for more advanced network
functionality, robust, scalable services, and supportive dynamic
network infrastructure.

Canadian wireline companies are dismantling legacy networks and
investing in next generation platforms and data centres that
combine voice, data, and video solutions onto a single distribution
and access platform. As next generation platforms become more
popular, our competition will begin to include systems integrators
and manufacturers.

22

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Our Strategy, Key Performance Drivers, and Strategic Highlights
As part of our overall strategy and related priorities, we set corporate objectives each year to measure progress on our long-term strategic
priorities and address short-term opportunities and risks.

OUR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

Our strategy builds on our many strengths, including our unique
mix of network and media assets. Our focus is clear: deliver a
best-in-class customer experience, grow the core business, and
deliver industry-leading shareholder value.

To achieve these goals, our strategic priorities are as follows:
• Create best-in-class customer experiences by putting our

customers first in everything we do;

• Invest

in our networks and technology to deliver

leading

performance and reliability;

• Deliver innovative solutions and compelling content that our

customers will love;

• Drive profitable growth in all the markets we serve;
• Develop our people and a high performance culture; and
• Be a strong, socially responsible leader in our communities

across Canada.

CREATE BEST-IN-CLASS CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES BY
PUTTING OUR CUSTOMERS FIRST IN EVERYTHING WE DO
Everything starts and ends with our customer, so improving their
experience is core to our strategy. We obsess over our customers’
end-to-end service experiences by listening carefully to the voice of
our customers and the voice of our front-line. We will continue to
focus on making things clear, simple, and fair for our customers
while we continue building our digital capabilities so our customers
have reliable and consistent experiences across our channels.

INVEST IN OUR NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGY TO
DELIVER LEADING PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY
We believe that networks are the lifeblood of our business and
world-class performance is critical to our future. Our plan is to
deliver high-performing network services with a focus on core
performance and reliability. Our investments in our cable network
will allow us to continue to improve Cable Internet performance
and reliability. Accelerated investments in our wireless network will
ensure we keep up with our customers’ growing data demands
while setting the stage for a smooth evolution to 5G.

DELIVER INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND COMPELLING
CONTENT THAT OUR CUSTOMERS WILL LOVE
Innovation has always been a part of our DNA. We strive to deliver
compelling products and innovative solutions to our customers that
make their lives easier. We will do this by leveraging proven
technologies and remarkable innovations from across the globe,
making them more cost-effective for us.

Rogers has some of the most sought-after media assets in Canada,
including a deep roster of leading sports assets, top radio stations,
and award-winning television programming. Canadians expect to
be able to consume the content they want, when and where they
want. We will continue to invest in delivering the content our
audiences value and want most, delivered on their screens of
choice.

DRIVE PROFITABLE GROWTH IN ALL THE MARKETS WE
SERVE
The overarching goal of our strategy is to accelerate revenue
growth in a sustainable way and translate it into strong margins,
profit, free cash flow, an increasing return on assets, and returns to
shareholders. Our focus is on our core growth drivers while
developing a strong capability in cost management to support
investments to fuel our future.

DEVELOP OUR PEOPLE AND A HIGH PERFORMANCE
CULTURE
Our people and our culture are the heart and soul of our success,
and their passion for our customers and our company is truly
incredible. Our strategy is to invest more in our people through
training and development programs and to establish clear
accountabilities for all employees. We are working to strengthen
our employment brand and to make Rogers a top employer known
for attracting and retaining the best talent. This means fostering an
open, trusting, and diverse workplace grounded in accountability
and performance.

BE A STRONG, SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE LEADER IN OUR
COMMUNITIES ACROSS CANADA
Giving back where we live and work is an important part of who we
are. Our goal is to be a relevant and respected community leader
in each region of our country. This means leveraging our strong
teams to be active and engaged volunteers in our
local
communities and to deliver a strong,
regionally empowered
program.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

23

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 OBJECTIVES

For 2018, we set forth the following objectives related to our strategic priorities.

Strategic Priority

2018 Objectives

Create best-in-class customer experiences by putting our
customers first in everything we do

Invest in our networks and technology to deliver leading
performance and reliability

Deliver innovative solutions and compelling content that our
customers will love

Drive profitable growth in all the markets we serve

Develop our people and a high performance culture

Be a strong, socially responsible leader in our communities
across Canada

Improve our end-to-end customer experience by improving
critical end-to-end processes;
investing in multi-channel
capabilities; simplifying frontline tools; and delivering online
tools and apps to improve our customers’ experiences

Deliver improved network performance and system stability by
improving the performance and reliability of both our wireless
and cable networks

Deliver solutions that will grow our core business through a
smooth launch of Ignite TV and the delivery of other innovative
content solutions and compelling content

Achieve our 2018 financial targets while at the same time
investing to support future growth and driving a focus on cost
management and margin improvement

Make Rogers one of the best places to work in Canada by
strengthening our employment brand; supporting the personal
and career development of our leaders and teams; improving
the employee experience, especially for our frontline team; and
evolving our incentive plans to drive a “customer first” culture

Develop a better local presence in our key regional markets
through the launch of our Give Together Community Investment
regionally empowered
program;
program and plan; and the expansion of Internet service for all
Canadians

the delivery of a strong,

KEY PERFORMANCE DRIVERS AND 2018 STRATEGIC HIGHLIGHTS

The following achievements display the progress we made towards meeting our refocused strategic priorities and the objectives we set
along with them, as discussed above.

CREATE BEST-IN-CLASS CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES BY
PUTTING OUR CUSTOMERS FIRST IN EVERYTHING WE DO
• Attracted our highest number of Wireless postpaid net additions
and realized our lowest annual Wireless postpaid churn rate
since 2009.

• Invested in the modernization of our Fido and Rogers retail

stores.

• Renewed our focus on digital self-serve, growing our customer
digital adoption rate and allowing our customers to access their
accounts and purchase new products with ease.

• Increased customer experience metrics to account for 50% of

our 2018 company-wide bonus plan.

INVEST IN OUR NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGY TO
DELIVER LEADING PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY
• Invested in LTE Advanced network technology for wireless

network capacity and performance.

• Worked with Ericsson, the North American 5G partner of choice,
to densify our network with small and macro cell sites and
upgrade our 4.5G network with the latest 5G-ready technology.
• Launched a three-year partnership with the University of British
Columbia (UBC) to create Canada’s first real-world 5G hub on
UBC’s campus,
facilitating research and developing 5G
applications.

• Received the 2018 Speedtest® Award for Canada’s Fastest
Internet by Ookla®, a global
leader in fixed broadband and
mobile network testing, following ongoing investment in our
network.

24

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

DELIVER INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND COMPELLING
CONTENT THAT OUR CUSTOMERS WILL LOVE
• Launched Ignite TV to our Cable footprint in Ontario and
launched employee trials in our Atlantic Canada Cable footprint.
• Invested almost $700 million to produce and create Canadian
entertainment, news, and sports programming during the 2018
broadcast year.

• For the fourth consecutive year, Sportsnet was ranked Canada’s

number-one sports media brand.

• Celebrated 50 years of local programming through Rogers TV.
• Expanded our presence in local markets with the introduction of
CityNews in Vancouver, Montreal, and Calgary, the acquisition of
102.1 CJCY in Medicine Hat, and the launch of hyper-local news
sites in Ottawa and Kitchener in partnership with Village Media.
• Successfully completed the fourth year of our exclusive 12-year
national NHL Agreement, reaching an audience of 24.6 million
during the 2018 Stanley Cup Playoffs,
including the most
watched Stanley Cup Final since 2014.

DRIVE PROFITABLE GROWTH IN ALL THE MARKETS WE
SERVE
• Achieved our 2018 guidance targets after raising our adjusted
EBITDA guidance in the third quarter. See “Financial and
Operating Guidance” for more information.

• Grew total revenue by 5% and adjusted EBITDA by 9%.
shareholder
• Delivered total

return of 12.5% in 2018,

21 percentage points above the TSX Composite Index return.

DEVELOP OUR PEOPLE AND A HIGH PERFORMANCE
CULTURE
• Achieved a best-in-class employee engagement score.
• Recognized as one of Canada’s Top 100 Employers for 2018, for
the 6th year in a row, including recognition as one of the Greater
Toronto Area’s Top Employers, a Top Employer for Young
People, a Best Diversity Employer, and one of Canada’s Greenest
Employers, in reports released by Mediacorp Inc.

• Recognized as one of Canada’s 50 Most Engaged Workplaces

for 2018 by Achievers.

• Achieved female representation of 30% for executive positions of

Vice President and above.

• Named to the 2018 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index (GEI) in
January 2018, which shared data on over 100 companies who
lead in gender equality around the world. The GEI looks at our
internal statistics, policies, engagement, and other gender-
conscious programs that reflect our commitment to advancing
women in the workplace and marketplace.

BE A STRONG, SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE LEADER IN OUR
COMMUNITIES ACROSS CANADA
• Invested over $60 million in our communities through cash and
in-kind donations to various charitable organizations and causes.
• Awarded 313 scholarships through our community partners and
to dependents of our hard-working employees. Additionally, this
program provided 105 grants to community organizations
across the country that provide innovative and educational
programs for youth.

• Volunteered over 20,000 hours to local charities across Canada,
including through our first-ever Give Together Volunteer Days,
where team members gave over 10,000 hours of support to over
50 charitable organizations.

• Raised over $2.5 million from our second annual employee
giving campaign, Give Together Month, where Rogers matched
employee donations to the charity of their choice, up to $1,000
each.

• Released Rogers’ 2018 Transparency Report, which outlines how
we share customer information in response to requests from
legal authorities as part of our obligation to contribute to public
safety while protecting our customers’ privacy.

• Expanded access to Connected for Success, a program offering
access to affordable, high-speed Internet
to over 200,000
low-income Canadian households through 300 subsidized
housing partners across our cable footprint.

• Became a participating partner

in Connecting Families, a

low-cost Government of Canada Internet initiative.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

25

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2019 OBJECTIVES

Strategic Priority

Create best-in-class customer experiences by putting our
customers first in everything we do

Invest in our networks and technology to deliver leading
performance and reliability

Deliver innovative solutions and compelling content that our
customers will love

Drive profitable growth in all the markets we serve

Develop our people and a high performance culture

Be a strong, socially responsible leader in our communities
across Canada

2019 Objectives

Improve our end-to-end customer experience by creating
in distribution
frictionless multi-channel capabilities;
improvements; simplify frontline tools; and deliver personalized
online tools and apps to improve our customers’ experiences

invest

Deliver network performance and a system stability plan that
supports our 5G and Connected Home roadmaps by increasing
our fibre deployments, densifying our network, and modernizing
our IT systems

Deliver solutions that will grow our core businesses by
expanding our 5G network capabilities, extending our Ignite
Connected Home products, and growing our compelling
content and data-driven advertising solutions

Drive company-wide financial results by achieving our financial
goals and 2019 guidance while investing to support future
growth and driving a focus on cost management and margin
improvement

Build our culture and our reputation by cultivating strong,
accountable leaders in a high-performing culture, sustaining and
growing best-in-class engagement, and becoming a destination
for talent

Become a strong home team in each region by growing our
community investment and giving program, building on our
regional focus, and supporting our rural and affordable access
agenda

26

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

FINANCIAL AND OPERATING GUIDANCE

We provide consolidated annual guidance ranges for selected financial metrics on a basis consistent with the annual plans approved by
the Board.

2018 ACHIEVEMENTS AGAINST GUIDANCE
The following table outlines guidance ranges that we had
previously provided and our actual results and achievements for the
selected full-year 2018 financial metrics.

(In millions of dollars,
except percentages)

2017
(restated)1

Consolidated Guidance 2
Revenue

14,369

Adjusted EBITDA 3

5,502

Capital expenditures 4

2,436

Free cash flow 3

1,685

2018
Guidance
Ranges

Increase of
3% to 5%

Increase of
7% to 9%

2,650 to
2,850

Increase of
5% to 7%

2018
Actual

Achievement

15,096 5.1%

5,983 8.7%

2,790 n/m

1,771 5.1%

✓

✓

✓

✓

n/m — not meaningful
1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

2 The table outlines guidance ranges for selected full-year 2018 consolidated financial
metrics provided in our January 25, 2018 earnings release and subsequently updated
on October 19, 2018. Guidance ranges presented as percentages reflect percentage
increases over 2017 actual results.

3 Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be
considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined
terms under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way
to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about
these measures, including how we calculate them.

4 Includes additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds on disposition,

but does not include expenditures for spectrum licences.

2019 FULL-YEAR CONSOLIDATED GUIDANCE
For the full-year 2019, we expect steady growth in revenue and
adjusted EBITDA to drive higher free cash flow, despite higher
capital expenditures.
In 2019, we expect to have the financial
flexibility to maintain our network advantages, to further reduce
debt, and to continue to return cash to shareholders.

(In millions of dollars,
except percentages)

Consolidated Guidance
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA 2,3
Capital expenditures 4
Free cash flow 2,3,5

2018
Actual

2019
Guidance Ranges 1

15,096
5,983
2,790
2,134

Increase of 3% to 5%
Increase of 7% to 9%
2,850 to 3,050
Increase of 200 to 300

1 Guidance ranges presented as percentages reflect percentage increases over full-
year 2018 results. 2019 amounts for purposes of assessing our performance against
guidance will be calculated in accordance with accounting policies after adopting
IFRS 16, Leases (IFRS 16) on January 1, 2019. See “Accounting Policies” for more
information.

2 Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be
considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined
terms under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way
to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about
these measures, including how we calculate them.

3 We will record the initial impacts of adopting IFRS 16 in our opening balance sheet
effective January 1, 2019. The ongoing impacts will be addressed in our results
prospectively from that date. Our 2018 results will not be restated such that our 2019
guidance ranges for adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow include the effect of our
adoption of IFRS 16. Were we to adopt IFRS 16 on a retrospective basis, 2018
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow would each have been $174 million higher.

4 Includes additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds on disposition,

but does not include expenditures for spectrum licences.

5 Effective January 1, 2019, we will amend our definition of free cash flow. Free cash
flow presented above reflects this change. See “Managing our Liquidity and Financial
Resources” for more information, including a reconciliation of the impact of this
change on full-year 2018 free cash flow.

The above table outlines guidance ranges for selected full-year
2019 consolidated financial metrics. These ranges take into
consideration our current outlook, our 2018 results, and the
estimated effect of our adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 on a
cumulative catch-up basis and not retrospectively. The purpose of
the financial outlook is to assist investors, shareholders, and others
in understanding certain financial metrics relating to expected
2019 financial
results for evaluating the performance of our
business. This information may not be appropriate for other
purposes. Information about our guidance, including the various
assumptions underlying it, is forward-looking and should be read in
conjunction with “About Forward-Looking Information”, “Risks and
Uncertainties Affecting Our Business”, and the related disclosure
and information about
various economic, competitive, and
regulatory assumptions, factors, and risks that may cause our actual
future financial and operating results to differ from what we
currently expect.

Any updates to our full-year financial guidance over the course of
the year would only be made to the consolidated guidance ranges
that appear above.

Key underlying assumptions
Our 2019 guidance ranges above are based on many assumptions
including, but not limited to, the following material assumptions for
the full-year 2019:
• continued increase in competitive intensity in all segments in

which we operate;

• a substantial portion of our 2019 US dollar-denominated
expenditures is hedged at an average exchange rate of
$1.25/US$;

• key interest rates remain relatively stable throughout 2019;
• no significant additional legal or regulatory developments, shifts
in economic conditions, or macro changes in the competitive
environment affecting our business activities. We note that
regulatory decisions issued during 2019 could materially alter
underlying assumptions around our 2019 Wireless, Cable, and/
or Media results in the current and future years, the impacts of
which are currently unknown and not factored into our guidance;
• Wireless customers continue to adopt, and upgrade to, higher-
value smartphones and select higher data usage packages at
similar rates in 2019 compared to 2018 and a similar proportion
of customers remain on term contracts;

• overall wireless market penetration in Canada grows in 2019 at a

similar rate as in 2018;

• our relative market share in Wireless and Cable is not negatively

impacted by changing competitive dynamics;

• continued subscriber growth in Wireless and Internet; stable
Television subscribers; and a decline in our Phone subscriber
base;

• in Media, continued growth in sports and declines in certain

traditional media businesses; and

• with respect to the increase in capital expenditures:

• we continue to invest appropriately to ensure we have
competitive wireless and cable networks through (i) building a
4.5G to 5G wireless network and (ii) upgrading our hybrid
fibre-coaxial network to lower the number of homes passed
per node, utilize the latest technologies, and deliver an even
more reliable customer experience; and

• we continue to make expenditures related to our Connected

Home roadmap in 2019.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

27

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Capability to Deliver Results

LEADING NETWORKS

WIRELESS
Rogers has one of the most extensive and advanced wireless
networks in Canada, which:
• was the first LTE high-speed network in Canada;
• reached 96% of the Canadian population as at December 31,

will
increase our 5G-related trials across key applications and
multiple frequencies in 2019. A number of investments will be
required to successfully launch a 5G network, including:
• refarming spectrum currently used for 2G and 3G to LTE;
• densifying our wireless network with macro and small cells in key

2018 on our LTE network alone;

markets; and

• is supported by voice and data roaming agreements with
international carriers in more than 200 destinations, including a
growing number of LTE roaming operators; and

• includes network sharing arrangements with three regional
wireless operators that operate in urban and rural parts of
Canada.

We are continuously enhancing our IP service infrastructure for all
our wireless services. Advances in technology have transformed the
ways in which our customers interact and use the variety of tools
available to them in their personal and professional
lives.
Technology has also changed the way businesses operate.

• purchasing 5G-ready radio network equipment with lower unit
and operational costs, the ability to aggregate more radio
carriers, and greater spectral efficiency.

Significant spectrum position
Our wireless services are supported by our significant wireless
spectrum holdings in both high-band and low-band frequency
ranges. As part of our network strategy, we expect to continue
making significant capital investments in spectrum to:
• support the rapidly growing usage of wireless data services;
• support the launch of a 5G-capable network; and
• introduce new innovative network-enabled features and

We are augmenting our existing LTE network with 4.5G technology
investments that are designed to migrate to a 5G environment. We

functionality.

Our spectrum holdings as at December 31, 2018 include:

Type of spectrum

Rogers licence

700 MHz

850 MHz

1900 MHz

AWS 1700/2100 MHz

2500 MHz

24 MHz in Canada’s major geographic markets, covering 92% of
the Canadian population.

25 MHz across Canada.

60 MHz in all areas of Canada except 40 MHz in northern
Quebec, 50 MHz in southern Ontario, and 40 MHz in the Yukon,
Northwest Territories, and Nunavut.

40 MHz in British Columbia and Alberta, 30 MHz in southern
Ontario, an additional 10 MHz in the Greater Toronto Area, and
20 MHz in the rest of Canada.

40 MHz FDD across Canada except 20 MHz in parts of Quebec
and an additional 25 MHz TDD in key population areas in
Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia.

We also have access to additional spectrum through the following network sharing agreements:

Type of spectrum

Kind of venture

2.3 GHz/3.5 GHz range

Inukshuk Wireless Partnership is a joint operation with BCE Inc. in
which Rogers holds a 50% interest. Inukshuk holds 30 MHz (of
which 20 MHz is usable) of FDD 2.3 GHz spectrum primarily in
eastern Canada, including certain population centres in southern
and eastern Ontario, southern Quebec, and smaller holdings in
New Brunswick, Manitoba, Alberta, and British Columbia.
Inukshuk also holds 3.5 GHz TDD licences (between 50-175
MHz) in most of the major population centres across Canada.
The current fixed wireless LTE national network utilizes the jointly
held 2.3 GHz and 3.5 GHz spectrum bands.

Who it supports

4G / 4.5G LTE subscribers.

2G GSM, 3.5G HSPA+, and 4G / 4.5G
LTE subscribers.

2G GSM, 3.5G HSPA+, and 4G / 4.5G
LTE subscribers.

4G / 4.5G LTE subscribers.

4G / 4.5G LTE subscribers.

Who it supports

Fixed wireless subscribers.

850 MHz, 1900 MHz
AWS spectrum,
700 MHz

Three network-sharing arrangements to enhance coverage and
network capabilities:
• with Bell MTS, which covers 98% of the population across

Manitoba;

• with TBayTel, that covers the combined base of customers in

northwestern Ontario; and

• with Quebecor (Videotron) to provide LTE services across the

province of Quebec and Ottawa.

3.5G / 4G HSPA+, 4G LTE
subscribers.
3.5G / 4G HSPA+, 4G LTE
subscribers.
3.5G / 4G LTE subscribers.

28

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

CABLE
Our expansive fibre and hybrid fibre-coaxial infrastructure delivers
services to consumers and businesses in Ontario, New Brunswick,
and on the island of Newfoundland. We also operate a
transcontinental, facilities-based fibre-optic network with 72,000
kilometres of fibre optic cable that is used to service enterprise
customers, including government and other telecommunications
service providers. We also use our extensive fibre network for
backhaul for wireless cell site traffic. In Canada, the network extends
coast-to-coast and includes local and regional fibre, transmission
electronics and systems, hubs, points of presence, and IP routing
and switching infrastructure. The network also extends to the US
from Vancouver south to Seattle; from the Manitoba-Minnesota
border
from
through Minneapolis, Milwaukee, and Chicago;
Toronto through Buffalo; and from Montreal through Albany to
New York City and Ashburn, allowing us to connect Canada’s
largest markets, while also reaching key US markets for the
exchange of data and voice traffic.

The network is structured to optimize performance and reliability
and to allow for the simultaneous delivery of video, voice, and
Internet over a single platform. It is generally constructed in rings
that interconnect with distribution hubs, providing redundancy to
minimize disruptions that can result from fibre cuts and other
events.

Homes and commercial buildings are connected to our network
through hybrid fibre-coaxial (HFC) nodes or FTTH. We connect the
HFC node to the network using fibre optic cable and the home to
the node using coaxial cable or fibre. Using 860 MHz and 750 MHz
of cable spectrum in Ontario and Atlantic Canada, respectively, we
deliver video, voice, and broadband services to our customers.
Hybrid fibre-coaxial node segmentation reduces the number of
homes passed per HFC node, thereby increasing the bandwidth
and capacity per subscriber.

We continually upgrade the network to improve capacity, enhance
performance and reliability, reduce operating costs, and introduce
new features and functionality. Our investments are focused on:
• uplifting our HFC network to 1.2 GHz while at the same time
improving network performance, quality, and reliability by
deploying digital
removing radio frequency
amplifiers, and reducing homes passed per node to an average
of 60;

fibre optics,

• increasing capacity per subscriber by enabling the 1.2 GHz of
spectrum with additional DOCSIS 3.1 downstream and
upstream channels and full duplex DOCSIS that, over time, are
expected to support downstream speeds up to 10 gigabits per
second (Gbps);

• improving video signal compression by moving to more

advanced video protocols;

• improving channel and on-demand capacity through switched

digital video; and

• increasing the FTTH footprint by connecting more homes and

multiple dwelling unit buildings directly to fibre.

Broadband Internet service is provided using a DOCSIS CCAP
3.0/3.1 platform, which combines multiple radio frequency
channels onto one access point at
the customer premise,
delivering exceptional performance. Over the last 20 years, HFC

node segmentation, along with DTV spectrum repurposing and
evolution from DOCSIS 1.0 to DOCSIS 3.1, has increased
downstream and upstream capacity by approximately 1,000 and
200 times, respectively. This track record of
investing in our
networks and demonstrating the capability to cost-effectively
deploy best-in-class service is one of our key strategies for ensuring
that we stay competitive with other service providers that provide
Internet service into homes and businesses over copper facilities. By
the end of 2016, 100% of our cable network had been upgraded
to DOCSIS CCAP technology supporting DOCSIS 3.1 and Ignite
Gigabit Internet.

the foundation for

We have been deploying 1 GHz fibre-to-the-curb (FTTC) in new
development areas and transitioning to FTTH since 2005. In 2018,
we began upgrading our HFC network to a mix of 1.2 GHz FTTC
subsequent
and FTTH. FTTC provides
generations of DOCSIS, including Remote PHY and Full Duplex
DOCSIS, which will
improve high-speed Internet accessibility,
quality, and tier speed attainability, while increasing the capacity of
our HFC network. FTTH will be based on XGS passive optical
network technology that
is expected to support symmetrical
downstream/upstream speeds up to 10 Gbps per node in select
neighbourhoods.

We continue to invest in and improve our cable network services;
for example, with technology to support gigabit Internet speeds,
Ignite TV, Rogers 4K TV, our 4K PVR set-top box, and a significant
commitment to live broadcasting in 4K, including all regular season
Toronto Blue Jays home games for 2019 and numerous NHL and
NBA games.

Voice-over-cable telephony services are currently provided over a
dedicated DOCSIS network. Our offerings ensure a high quality of
service by including geographic redundancy as well as network
backup powering. Our phone service includes a rich set of features,
such as TV Call Display (available on our NextBox set-top boxes),
three-way calling, and advanced voicemail
features that allow
customers to be notified of, and listen to, their home voicemail on
their wireless phone or over the Internet.

We own and operate some of the most advanced networks and
data centres in Canada. We leverage our national fibre, cable, and
wireless networks and data centre infrastructure to enable
businesses to deliver greater value to their customers through
proactive network monitoring and problem resolution with
enterprise-level reliability, security, and performance. Our primary
and secondary Network Operation Centres proactively monitor
Rogers’ networks to mitigate the risk of service interruptions and
allow for rapid responses to any outages.

Our data centres provide guaranteed uptime and expertise in
collocation, cloud, and managed services solutions. We own and
operate 16 state-of-the-art, highly reliable, certified data centres
across Canada, including:
• Canada’s first Tier III Design and Construction certified multi-

tenant facility in Toronto;

• Alberta’s first Tier III certified data centre; and
• a third Tier III certified data centre in Ottawa.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

29

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

POWERFUL BRANDS

FIRST-CLASS MEDIA CONTENT

The Rogers brand has strong national recognition through our:
• established networks;
• extensive distribution;
• recognizable media content and programming;
• advertising;
• event sponsorships, including the Rogers Cup;
• community investment, including the Ted Rogers Scholarship

We deliver highly sought-after sports content enhanced by the
following initiatives:
• an exclusive 12-year agreement with the NHL, which runs
that allows us to deliver
through the 2025-2026 season,
unprecedented coverage of professional hockey in Canada
across television, smartphones, tablets, and the Internet;

• Rogers NHL LIVE, an online OTT destination for enhancing NHL

Fund; and

action on any screen;

• naming rights to some of Canada’s landmark buildings.

• Sportsnet NOW, Canada’s first OTT sports service, offering 24/7

We also own or utilize some of Canada’s most recognized brands,
including:
• the wireless brands of Rogers, Fido, and chatr;
• 24 TV stations and specialty channels, including Sportsnet, FX

(Canada) and FXX (Canada), OMNI, and City;

• publications,

including Maclean’s, Chatelaine, Today’s Parent,

Flare, and Hello! Canada;

• 55 radio stations, including 98.1 CHFI, 680 NEWS, Sportsnet The

FAN, KiSS, JACK FM, and SONiC;

• major league sports teams, including the Toronto Blue Jays, and
teams owned by MLSE, such as the Toronto Maple Leafs, the
Toronto Raptors, Toronto FC, and the Toronto Argonauts;

• an exclusive 12-year agreement with the NHL, which runs
through the 2025-2026 season,
that allows us to deliver
unprecedented coverage of professional hockey in Canada; and

• TSC, a premium online and TV shopping retailer.

WIDESPREAD PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION

WIRELESS
We distribute our wireless products nationally using various
channels, including:
• company-owned Rogers, Fido, and chatr retail stores;
• customer self-serve using rogers.com, fido.ca, chatrwireless.com,

and e-commerce sites;

• an extensive independent dealer network;
• major retail chains and convenience stores;
• other distribution channels, such as WOW! mobile boutique, as
well as Wireless Wave and TBooth Wireless through our
ownership interest in Glentel;

• our call centres; and
• outbound telemarketing.

CABLE
We distribute our residential cable products using various channels,
including:
• company-owned Rogers and Fido retail stores;
• customer self-serve using rogers.com and fido.ca;
• our call centres, outbound telemarketing, and door-to-door

agents; and

• major retail chains.

Our sales team and third-party retailers sell services to the
enterprise, public sector, and carrier wholesale markets. An
extensive network of third-party channel distributors deals with IT
integrators, consultants, local service providers, and other indirect
sales relationships. This diverse approach gives greater breadth of
coverage and allows for strong sales growth for next generation
services.

access to Sportsnet’s TV content;

• Sportsnet NOW+, which offers access to additional content,
such as additional NHL games, the Bundesliga, Premiership
Rugby, and the Scottish Premiership;

• GamePlus, an innovative and interactive experience within
Rogers NHL LIVE that
includes enhanced camera angles,
exclusive interviews and analysis, and original video-on-demand
content;

• Rogers Hometown Hockey Tour, which brings hockey-themed
festivities and outdoor viewing parties to 25 communities across
Canada over the 2018-2019 NHL season;

• the MLB Network, a 24-hour network dedicated to baseball,

brought to Canada on Rogers television services;

• an 8-year, multi-platform broadcast rights agreement with MLB
Properties and MLB Advanced Media to show live and
in-progress games and highlights within Canada through 2021;
• a 10-year, multi-platform agreement that runs through to August
2024, which makes Rogers the exclusive wholesaler and a
distributor of World Wrestling Entertainment’s (WWE) flagship
programming in Canada; and

• exclusive broadcasting and distribution rights of the Toronto

Blue Jays through our ownership of the team.

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE

We are committed to providing our customers with the best
experience possible. To do this, we have invested in several areas to
make it easier and more convenient for customers to interact with
us, such as:
• contact centres located throughout Canada;
• an innovative Integrated Voice Response (IVR) system that can
take calls in four languages, including English, French, Mandarin,
and Cantonese;

• voice authentication technology across all of our call centres that
automatically identifies our customers by their voice, increasing
security and protecting customers from potential fraud;

• self-serve options, including:

• the ability for Fido and Rogers customers to complete price

plan changes and hardware upgrades online;

• simplified login, allowing Fido customers to log in to their
accounts online or through the Fido MyAccount app using
their Facebook login credentials, eliminating the need to
remember multiple login credentials and making self-service
easier to access;

30

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

• the ability for customers to install

products at
technician visiting their residence; and

their convenience, without

their Internet and TV
the need for a

• Rogers EnRoute, a tool that gives customers the ability to track
on their phone when a technician will arrive for an installation
or service call;

• customer care available over Facebook Messenger, Twitter, and

online chat through our websites;

• Family Data Manager, a data manager tool, and Data Top Ups,
both of which allow Wireless customers to manage and
customize their data usage in real-time through MyRogers;

• Fido Data Bytes, which grant Fido Pulse customers an additional

hour of data, five times per billing cycle, at no extra charge;

• Fido XTRA, a program that gives Fido postpaid Wireless and
Internet customers free access to new perks every Thursday, such
as deals and giveaways from leading brands on food, drinks,
apparel, entertainment, and more;

• a simple online bill, making it easier for customers to read and

understand their monthly charges; and

• Roam Like Home and Fido Roam, worry-free wireless roaming
allowing Canadians to use their wireless plan like they do at
home when traveling to included destinations.

ENGAGED PEOPLE

For our team of approximately 26,100 employees, we strive to
create a great workplace, focusing on all aspects of the employee
experience, which include:
• engaging employees and building high-performing teams
through initiatives including engagement surveys and leadership
development programs;

• aiming to attract and retain top talent through effective training
and development, performance-driven employee recognition
programs, and career progression programs for
front-line
employees;

• maintaining our commitment to diversity and inclusion; and
• providing a safe, collaborative, and agile workplace that provides

employees the tools and training to be successful.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

$1,051 million of marketable equity securities in publicly traded
companies as at December 31, 2018.

The following information is forward-looking and should be read in
conjunction with “About Forward-Looking Information”, “Financial
and Operating Guidance”, “Risks and Uncertainties Affecting Our
Business”, and our other disclosures about various economic,
competitive, and regulatory assumptions, factors, and risks that
could cause our actual future financial and operating results to
differ from those currently expected.

Similar to 2018, we anticipate generating positive free cash flow in
2019. We expect that we will have sufficient capital resources to
satisfy our cash funding requirements in 2019,
including the
funding of dividends on our common shares, repayment of
maturing long-term debt, and other financing activities, investing
activities, and other requirements. This takes into account our
opening cash balance, cash provided by operating activities, the
amount available under our $3.2 billion bank credit facility, our
accounts receivable securitization program, our US CP program,
and funds available to us from the issuance of other bank, publicly
issued, or private placement debt
from time to time. As at
December 31, 2018, there were no significant restrictions on the
flow of funds between RCI and its subsidiary companies.

funding
We believe we can satisfy foreseeable additional
requirements by
financing, which,
issuing additional debt
depending on market conditions, could include restructuring our
existing bank credit and letter of credit facilities, entering into new
bank credit facilities, issuing public or private long-term or short-
term debt, amending the terms of our accounts receivable
securitization or US CP programs, or issuing equity. We may also
opportunistically refinance a portion of existing debt depending on
market conditions and other
factors. There is no assurance,
however, that these financing initiatives will or can be done as they
become necessary.

HEALTHY TRADING VOLUMES AND
DIVIDENDS

FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY

We have an investment-grade balance sheet, conservative debt
leverage, and substantial available liquidity of $2,391 million as at
December 31, 2018. Our capital resources consist primarily of cash
provided by operating activities, available lines of credit, funds
available under our accounts receivable securitization and US
dollar-denominated commercial paper (US CP) programs, and
long-term debt. We also own approximately
issuances of

Our RCI Class B Non-Voting common shares (Class B Non-Voting
Shares) actively trade on the TSX and NYSE with a combined
average daily trading volume of approximately 1.3 million shares in
2018. In addition, our RCI Class A Voting common shares (Class A
Shares) trade on the TSX. At the discretion of the Board, we pay an
equal dividend on both classes of shares. In 2018, each share paid
an annualized dividend of $1.92. In January 2019, we announced a
4.2% increase to our annualized dividend rate, bringing our
annualized dividend to $2.00 per share.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

31

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2018 Financial Results
See “Accounting Policies” in this MD&A and the notes to our 2018
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
important
accounting policies and estimates as they relate to the following
discussion.

for

We use several key performance indicators to measure our
performance against our strategy and the results of our peers and

SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS

(In millions of dollars, except margins and per share amounts)

Revenue

Wireless
Cable 2
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations 2

Revenue
Total service revenue 3

Adjusted EBITDA 4
Wireless
Cable 2
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations 2

Adjusted EBITDA 4
Adjusted EBITDA margin 4

Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

Adjusted net income 4
Adjusted basic earnings per share 4
Adjusted diluted earnings per share 4

Capital expenditures
Cash provided by operating activities
Free cash flow 4

competitors. Many of these are not defined terms under IFRS and
should not be considered alternative measures to net income or
any other financial measure of performance under IFRS. See “Key
Performance Indicators” and “Non-GAAP Measures” for more
information.

Years ended December 31

2017

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

9,200
3,932
2,168
(204)

15,096
12,974

4,090
1,874
196
(177)

5,983
39.6%

2,059
$ 4.00
$ 3.99

2,241
$ 4.35
$ 4.34

2,790
4,288
1,771

8,569
3,894
2,153
(247)

14,369
12,550

3,726
1,819
127
(170)

7
1
1
(17)

5
3

10
3
54
4

5,502
9
38.3% 1.3 pts

1,845
$ 3.58
$ 3.57

1,902
$ 3.69
$ 3.68

2,436
3,938
1,685

12
12
12

18
18
18

15
9
5

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.
2 These figures have been retrospectively amended as a result of our reportable segment realignment. See “Understanding Our Business”.
3 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
4 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted net income, adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share, and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be
considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare
us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we calculate them.

32

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

KEY CHANGES IN FINANCIAL RESULTS THIS
YEAR COMPARED TO 2017

REVENUE
Wireless service revenue increased this year as a result of our
balanced approach to continue monetizing the increasing demand
for data along with a disciplined approach around subscriber base
management. Wireless equipment revenue grew 17% this year
driven by an increase in sales of higher value devices and increased
hardware upgrades.

Cable revenue increased this year as a result of the increase in
Internet revenue, due to the general movement of customers to
higher speed and usage tiers, the impact of Internet service pricing
changes, and a larger subscriber base for our Internet products,
partially offset by promotional pricing provided to subscribers and
Television subscriber losses over the past year.

Media revenue increased marginally as a result of higher revenue at
the Toronto Blue Jays, primarily due to a distribution from Major
League Baseball, and higher network subscription revenue, partially
offset by lower overall advertising revenue.

ADJUSTED EBITDA
Wireless adjusted EBITDA increased this year primarily as a result of
the strong flow-through of service revenue growth as described
above, partially offset by higher expenditures associated with
increased subscriber volumes and costs of devices, which led to a
margin of 44.5%, up 100 basis points from last year.

Cable adjusted EBITDA increased this year as a result of strong
Internet revenue growth, the ongoing product mix shift to higher-
margin Internet services, and various cost efficiencies, which led to
a margin of 47.7%, up 100 basis points from last year.

Media adjusted EBITDA increased this year primarily as a result of
increased revenue as discussed above and lower operating
expenses from improvements made to our cost structure across the
divisions, which led to a margin of 9.0%, up 310 basis points from
last year.

NET INCOME AND ADJUSTED NET INCOME
Net income and adjusted net income both increased this year
primarily as a result of higher adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by
higher depreciation and amortization.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

33

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

WIRELESS

ROGERS IS CANADA’S LARGEST PROVIDER OF
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

As at December 31, 2018, we had:
• approximately 10.8 million subscribers; and
• approximately 33% subscriber and revenue share of the

Canadian wireless market.

WIRELESS FINANCIAL RESULTS

Years ended December 31

2017

Service revenue
Service revenue includes revenue derived from voice and data
services from:
• postpaid and prepaid monthly fees;
• data usage;
• airtime;
• long distance charges;
• essential services charges;
• inbound and outbound roaming charges; and
• certain fees.

The 5% increase in service revenue this year was a result of:
• a 3% increase in blended ARPU, primarily due to the increased
mix of subscribers on higher-rate plans from our various brands;
and

(In millions of dollars, except margins)

2018

(restated)1 % Chg

• a larger postpaid subscriber base.

Revenue

Service revenue
Equipment revenue

Revenue

Operating expenses

Cost of equipment
Other operating expenses 2

Operating expenses

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA margin
Capital expenditures

7,091
2,109

9,200

2,264
2,846

5,110

4,090

44.5%
1,086

6,765
1,804

8,569

2,002
2,841

4,843

3,726

5
17

7

13
—

6

10

43.5% 1.0 pts
35

806

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

2 Other operating expenses for 2017 have been retrospectively amended to include

stock-based compensation. See “Understanding Our Business”.

WIRELESS SUBSCRIBER RESULTS 1

(In thousands, except churn, blended ABPU,
and blended ARPU)

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

Chg

Postpaid

Gross additions
Net additions
Total postpaid subscribers 2
Churn (monthly)

Prepaid

Gross additions
Net (losses) additions
Total prepaid subscribers 2
Churn (monthly)
Blended ABPU (monthly)
Blended ARPU (monthly) 3

1,632
453
9,157
1.10%

1,599
354
8,704
1.20%

33
99
453
(0.10 pts)

751
(152)
1,626
4.38%
$ 64.74
$ 55.64

782
61
1,778
3.48%
$ 62.31
$ 54.23

(31)
(213)
(152)
0.90 pts
2.43
1.41

$
$

1 Subscriber counts, subscriber churn, blended ABPU, and blended ARPU are key
performance indicators. Effective January 1, 2018, in conjunction with our transition to
IFRS 15, we commenced reporting blended ABPU as a new key performance
indicator. See “Key Performance Indicators”.

2 As at end of period.
3 Blended ARPU has been restated for 2017 using revenue recognition policies in

accordance with IFRS 15.

REVENUE
Our revenue depends on the size of our subscriber base, the
revenue per user, the revenue from the sale of wireless devices, and
other equipment revenue.

The 4% increase in blended ABPU was a result of the increased
service revenue as described above.

We believe the increases in gross and net additions to our postpaid
subscriber base and the lower postpaid churn this year were a
result of our strategic focus on enhancing the customer experience
by improving our customer service and continually increasing the
quality of our network.

Equipment revenue
Equipment revenue includes revenue from sales to subscribers
through fulfillment by Wireless’ customer service groups, websites,
telesales, corporate stores, and independent dealers, agents, and
retailers.

The 17% increase in equipment revenue this year was a result of:
• an increase in sales of higher-value devices; and
• an increase in device upgrades by existing subscribers.

OPERATING EXPENSES
We assess operating expenses in two categories:
• the cost of wireless devices and equipment; and
• all other expenses involved in day-to-day operations, to service
existing subscriber relationships, and to attract new subscribers.

The 13% increase in the cost of equipment this year was a result of:
• a continued shift in the product mix of device sales towards

higher-cost smartphones; and

• the increase in device upgrades by existing subscribers.

The marginal increase in other operating expenses this year was
due to higher expenditures associated with increased subscriber
volumes and costs of devices.

ADJUSTED EBITDA
The 10% increase in adjusted EBITDA this year was a result of the
strong flow-through of service revenue growth, partially offset by
higher operating expenses, as discussed above.

34

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

CABLE

ONE OF CANADA’S LEADING PROVIDERS OF HIGH-
SPEED INTERNET, CABLE TELEVISION, AND PHONE
SERVICES

As at December 31, 2018, we had:
• approximately 2.4 million high-speed Internet subscribers;
• approximately 1.7 million Television subscribers –

approximately 27% of Canadian cable television subscribers;

• approximately 1.1 million Phone subscribers; and
• a network passing approximately 4.4 million homes in

Ontario, New Brunswick, and on the island of Newfoundland.

CABLE FINANCIAL RESULTS

REVENUE
Internet revenue includes:
• monthly subscription and additional use service revenue from
small business, enterprise, public sector, and

residential,
wholesale Internet access subscribers;

• monthly service revenue from our smart home monitoring

products; and

• modem rental fees.

Television revenue includes:
• IPTV and digital cable services, such as:

• basic service fees;
• tier service fees;
• access fees for use of channel capacity by third parties; and
• premium and specialty service subscription fees,

including
pay-per-view service fees and video-on-demand service fees;
and

Years ended December 31

• rentals of television set-top boxes.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

(In millions of dollars, except margins)

2018

(restated)1 % Chg

2017

Revenue

Internet
Television
Phone

Service revenue
Equipment revenue

Revenue

Operating expenses

Cost of equipment
Other operating expenses 2

Operating expenses

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA margin
Capital expenditures

2,114
1,442
363

3,919
13

3,932

21
2,037

2,058

1,874

47.7%
1,429

1,967
1,501
411

3,879
15

3,894

20
2,055

2,075

1,819

7
(4)
(12)

1
(13)

1

5
(1)

(1)

3

46.7% 1.0 pts
7
1,334

1 Effective January 1, 2018, and on a retrospective basis, we realigned our reportable

segments and related financial results. See “Understanding Our Business”.

2 Other operating expenses for 2017 have been retrospectively amended to include

stock-based compensation. See “Understanding Our Business”.

CABLE SUBSCRIBER RESULTS 1

Phone revenue includes revenue from residential and small
business local telephony service from:
• monthly service fees;
• calling features, such as voicemail, call waiting, and caller ID; and
• long distance calling.

The 1% increase in revenue this year was a result of:
• the movement of Internet customers to higher speed and usage

tiers;

• the impact of service pricing changes; and
• a larger Internet subscriber base; partially offset by
• promotional pricing provided to subscribers; and
• a lower subscriber base for our Television products.

Internet revenue
The 7% increase in Internet revenue this year was a result of:
• general movement of customers to higher speed and usage
tiers of our Internet offerings, with 60% of our residential Internet
base on plans of 100 megabits per second or higher (2017—
54%);

• the impact of Internet service pricing changes; and
• a larger Internet subscriber base; partially offset by
• promotional pricing provided to subscribers.

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

Chg

Television revenue
The 4% decrease in Television revenue this year was a result of:
• the decline in legacy Television subscribers over the past year;

(In thousands)

Internet 2

Net additions
Total Internet subscribers 3

Television

Net losses
Total Television subscribers 3

Phone

Net additions
Total Phone subscribers 3

Homes passed 3
Total service units 4
Net additions
Total service units 3

1 Subscriber counts are key performance indicators. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
2 Effective January 1, 2018, and on a retrospective basis, our Internet subscriber results

include Smart Home Monitoring subscribers.

3 As at end of period.
4 Includes Internet, Television, and Phone.

109
2,430

95
2,321

(55)
1,685

(80)
1,740

8
1,116

14
1,108

4,361

4,307

62
5,231

29
5,169

14
109

25
(55)

(6)
8

54

33
62

partially offset by

• new Ignite TV subscribers this year with the launch of this

product; and

• the impact of Television service pricing changes, net of

promotional pricing provided to subscribers.

Phone revenue
The 12% decrease in Phone revenue this year was a result of
promotional pricing provided to subscribers.

Equipment revenue
Equipment revenue includes revenue generated from the sale of
cable set-top boxes,
Internet modems, and smart home
monitoring equipment. Equipment revenue this year was in line
with 2017.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

35

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OPERATING EXPENSES
We assess Cable operating expenses in three categories:
• the cost of programming;
• the cost of equipment revenue (cable set-top boxes, Internet
modem equipment, and smart home monitoring equipment);
and

• all other expenses involved in day-to-day operations, to service
and retain existing subscriber relationships, and to attract new
subscribers.

The 1% decrease in operating expenses this year was a result of
various cost efficiency and productivity initiatives.

ADJUSTED EBITDA
The 3% increase in adjusted EBITDA this year was a result of the
revenue and expense changes described above.

36

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

MEDIA

REVENUE
Media revenue is earned from:
• advertising sales across its television,

radio, digital media

DIVERSIFIED CANADIAN MEDIA COMPANY

properties, and publishing;

We have a broad portfolio of media properties, which most
significantly includes:
• sports media and entertainment, such as Sportsnet and the

Toronto Blue Jays;

• our exclusive national 12-year NHL Agreement;
• category-leading television and radio broadcasting

properties;

• multi-platform televised and online shopping;
• digital media; and
• publishing.

MEDIA FINANCIAL RESULTS

(In millions of dollars, except margins)

2018

2017

% Chg

Years ended December 31

Revenue

Operating expenses 1

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA margin

Capital expenditures

2,168

1,972

2,153

2,026

196

127

1

(3)

54

9.0%

5.9%

3.1 pts

90

83

8

1 Operating expenses for 2017 have been retrospectively amended to include stock-

based compensation. See “Understanding Our Business”.

• subscriptions to televised and OTT products;
• ticket sales, fund redistribution and other distributions from MLB,

and concession sales;
• retail product sales; and
• circulation of published products.

The marginal increase in revenue this year was a result of:
• higher revenue at the Toronto Blue Jays, primarily as a result of a

distribution from Major League Baseball; and

• higher Sportsnet and other network subscription revenue;

partially offset by

• lower advertising revenue.

OPERATING EXPENSES
We assess Media operating expenses by:
• the cost of broadcast content, including sports programming

and production;

• Toronto Blue Jays player payroll;
• the cost of retail products sold; and
• all other expenses involved in day-to-day operations.

The 3% decrease in operating expenses this year was a result of
various cost efficiencies and productivity initiatives across all
divisions.

ADJUSTED EBITDA
The 54% increase in adjusted EBITDA this year was a result of the
revenue and expense changes described above.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

37

 
 
 
WIRELESS
The increase in capital expenditures in Wireless this year was a
result of investments made to upgrade our wireless network to
continue delivering reliable performance for our customers. We
have continued augmenting our existing LTE network with 4.5G
technology investments that are also 5G-ready.

In 2017, we acquired a spectrum licence for $184 million, which is
not included in the table above. See “Managing Our Liquidity and
Financial Resources”.

CABLE
The increase in capital expenditures in Cable this year was a result
of higher investments in network infrastructure, partially related to
the launch of our Ignite TV service, which uses Comcast’s X1
IP-based video platform, and higher customer premise equipment
additions in 2018. We continued upgrading our hybrid fibre-
coaxial infrastructure with additional fibre deployments and further
DOCSIS technology enhancements. These deployments and
enhancements will lower the number of homes passed per node
and incorporate the latest technologies to help deliver more
bandwidth and an even more reliable customer experience.

MEDIA
The increase in capital expenditures this year was a result of higher
investments in the Rogers Centre, partially offset by lower
investments in our broadcast infrastructure.

CORPORATE
The decrease in Corporate capital expenditures this year was a
result of higher investments in information technology in 2017.

PROCEEDS ON DISPOSITION
We sold certain assets for total proceeds of $25 million in 2018
(2017 — $74 million).

CAPITAL INTENSITY
Capital intensity increased this year as a result of the higher capital
expenditures as discussed above, offset by the increase in revenue.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Capital expenditures include costs associated with acquiring
property, plant and equipment and placing it into service. The
telecommunications business requires extensive and continual
including investment in new technologies and the
investments,
expansion of capacity and geographical reach. The expenditures
related to the acquisition of spectrum licences are not included in
capital expenditures and do not factor into the calculation of free
cash flow or capital intensity. See “Managing Our Liquidity and
Financial
and
“Non-GAAP Measures” for more information.

Performance

Resources”,

Indicators”,

“Key

Capital expenditures are significant and have a material impact on
teams focus on
therefore, our management
our cash flows;
planning, funding, and managing them.

Capital expenditures before related changes to non-cash working
capital represent capital assets to which we took title. We believe
reflects our cost of property, plant and
this measure best
equipment
in a given period and is a simpler measure for
comparing between periods.

Years ended December 31

2017

(In millions of dollars, except capital intensity)

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

Capital expenditures 2

Wireless
Cable
Media
Corporate

Capital expenditures before proceeds on

disposition

Proceeds on disposition

1,086
1,429
90
210

806
1,334
83
287

2,815
(25)

2,510
(74)

35
7
8
(27)

12
(66)

Capital expenditures 2

2,790

2,436

15

Capital intensity 3

18.5%

17.0% 1.5 pts

1 Effective January 1, 2018, and on a retrospective basis, we realigned our reportable
segments and related financial results. As a result, certain figures have been
amended for comparative purposes. See “Understanding Our Business”.

2 Includes additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds on disposition,

but does not include expenditures for spectrum licences.

3 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.

38

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED PERFORMANCE

FINANCE COSTS

This section discusses our net income and other expenses that do
not form part of the segment discussions above.

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

% Chg

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

Loss on repayment of long-term

Years ended December 31

2017

Interest on borrowings 1
Interest on post-employment

benefits liability

Adjusted EBITDA 2
Deduct (add):

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of
property, plant and
equipment

Restructuring, acquisition and

other

Finance costs
Other income
Income tax expense

5,983

5,502

2,211

2,142

9

3

(16)

210
793
(32)
758

(49)

(67)

152
746
(19)
685

38
6
68
11

12

Net income

2,059

1,845

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

2 Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered a substitute
or alternative for GAAP measures. It is not a defined term under IFRS and does not
have a standard meaning, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other
companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for
this measure,
including how we calculate it.

information about

ADJUSTED EBITDA
See “Key Changes in Financial Results This Year Compared to
2017” for a discussion of the increase in adjusted EBITDA this year.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017 % Chg

Depreciation
Amortization

2,174
37

2,087
55

Total depreciation and amortization

2,211

2,142

4
(33)

3

Total depreciation and amortization increased this year primarily as
a result of higher capital expenditures. See “Capital Expenditures”
for more information.

RESTRUCTURING, ACQUISITION AND OTHER
This year, we incurred $210 million (2017 – $152 million)
in
restructuring, acquisition and other expenses. These expenses in
2018 primarily consisted of severance costs associated with the
targeted restructuring of our employee base and certain sports-
termination costs. These expenses in 2017
related contract
primarily consisted of severance costs associated with the targeted
restructuring of our employee base and costs pertaining to class
action lawsuits.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

debt

Loss (gain) on foreign exchange
Change in fair value of derivative

instruments

Capitalized interest
Other

Total finance costs

709

740

14

12

28
136

(95)
(20)
21

–
(107)

99
(18)
20

793

746

(4)

17

n/m
n/m

n/m
11
5

6

1 Interest on borrowings includes interest on short-term borrowings and on long-term

debt.

Interest on borrowings
Interest on borrowings decreased this year as a result of a higher
proportion of borrowings under our lower interest US CP program
compared to 2017 and the early redemption of our US$1.4 billion
senior notes in April 2018. See “Managing Our Liquidity and
Financial Resources” for more information about our debt and
related finance costs.

Loss on repayment of long-term debt
We recognized a $28 million loss on repayment of long-term debt
redemption premiums
this year
associated with our redemption of US$1.4 billion of senior notes in
April 2018 that were otherwise due in August 2018.

reflecting the payment of

Foreign exchange and change in fair value of derivative instruments
During 2018, all of our US dollar-denominated senior notes and
debentures were hedged for accounting purposes. Foreign
exchange losses recognized in 2018 were primarily related to our
US CP program borrowings,
for which the associated debt
derivatives were not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes due to the short-term nature of the borrowings. Foreign
exchange gains recognized in 2017 were also related to our US CP
program borrowings and US dollar-denominated credit facility
borrowings. Foreign exchange gains and losses are generally
substantially offset by a corresponding amount in “change in fair
value of derivative instruments”.

During the year, we determined that we would no longer be able
to exercise certain ten-year bond forward derivatives within the
originally designated time frame. Consequently, we discontinued
hedge accounting on those bond forward derivatives and
reclassified a $21 million loss from the hedging reserve within
shareholders’ equity to finance costs (recorded in “change in fair
value of derivative instruments”). We subsequently extended the
bond forwards to May 31, 2019, with the ability to extend them
further, and redesignated them as effective hedges.

See “Managing Our Liquidity and Financial Resources” for more
information about our debt and related finance costs.

OTHER INCOME
In 2017, we recognized a recovery on the reversal of a provision
pertaining to shomi of $20 million.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

39

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Below is a summary of the difference between income tax expense
computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income
before income tax expense and the actual income tax expense for
the year.

ADJUSTED NET INCOME
Adjusted net income was 18% higher compared to 2017, primarily
as a result of higher adjusted EBITDA and higher other income,
partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization and higher
income tax expense.

(In millions of dollars, except tax rates)

2018

2017
(restated) 1

(In millions of dollars, except per
share amounts)

Years ended December 31

Years ended December 31

2017

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

5,983

5,502

9

26.7%
2,530

Adjusted EBITDA 2
Deduct (add):

676

9

–

7

2

(10)
1

685

27.1%
475

Depreciation and amortization
Finance costs 3
Other (income) expense 4
Income tax expense 5

Adjusted net income 2

2,211
744
(32)
819

2,241

Adjusted basic earnings per share 2 $ 4.35
Adjusted diluted earnings per

2,142
746
1
711

1,902

$ 3.69

share 2

$ 4.34

$ 3.68

3
–
n/m
15

18

18

18

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

2 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, and adjusted basic and diluted earnings per
share are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered as substitutes or
alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS, and do not
have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other
companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures,
including how we calculate them.

3 Finance costs excludes a $21 million loss on discontinuation of hedge accounting on
certain bond forwards for the year ended December 31, 2018 (2017 – nil) and a
$28 million loss on repayment of long-term debt for the year ended December 31,
2018 (2017 – nil).

4 Other expense for 2017 excludes a $20 million recovery on the reversal of a provision

pertaining to the wind-down of shomi.

5 Income tax expense excludes a $61 million recovery (2017 – $28 million recovery) for
the year ended December 31, 2018 related to the income tax impact for adjusted
items. Income tax expense for 2017 also excludes a $2 million expense for the
revaluation of deferred tax balances as a result of legislative income tax rate changes.

EMPLOYEES
Employee salaries and benefits represent a material portion of our
expenses. As at December 31, 2018, we had approximately 26,100
employees (2017 – 24,500) across all of our operating groups,
including shared services and the corporate office. Total salaries
and benefits for full-time and part-time employees in 2018 were
$2,089 million (2017 – $2,111 million).

Statutory income tax rate
Income before income tax expense

Computed income tax expense
Increase (decrease) in income tax

expense resulting from:

Non-deductible stock-based

compensation

Non-deductible portion of equity

losses

Non-deductible loss on FVTOCI

investments

Income tax adjustment, legislative

tax change

Non-taxable portion of capital

gains
Other items

Total income tax expense

Effective income tax rate
Cash income taxes paid

26.7%
2,817

752

5

1

–

–

(9)
9

758

26.9%
370

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

Our effective income tax rate this year was 26.9% compared to
27.1% for 2017. The effective income tax rate for 2018 was higher
than the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of non-deductible
stock-based compensation.

Cash income taxes paid decreased this year primarily as a result of
the timing of installment payments.

NET INCOME
Net income was 12% higher than last year. See “Key Changes in
Financial Results This Year Compared to 2017”
for more
information.

(In millions of dollars, except per
share amounts)

Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

Years ended December 31

2017

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

2,059
$ 4.00
$ 3.99

1,845
$ 3.58
$ 3.57

12
12
12

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

40

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

2017 FULL-YEAR RESULTS COMPARED TO 2016
Effective January 1, 2018, upon adoption of IFRS 15, we made a
decision to restate 2017 reported figures in accordance with the
new accounting standard. Periods prior to 2017 have not been
restated. As a consequence of this decision,
for comparative
purposes, the 2017 full-year results compared to 2016 full-year
results presented below represent figures prepared in accordance
with accounting standards prior to the adoption of IFRS 15. These
results have been summarized in the table below.

Additionally, effective January 1, 2018, we adopted adjusted
EBITDA as our key profit measure, replacing our previous adjusted
operating profit non-GAAP measure. We also redefined our
reportable segments such that the results of our legacy Cable
segment, legacy Business Solutions segment, and our Smart Home
Monitoring products are presented within a redefined Cable
segment. All affected results presented in this MD&A have been
retrospectively amended to incorporate this profit measure change
and reportable segment redefinition.

(In millions of dollars, except margins)

2017 1

2016 1 % Chg

Years ended December 31

Revenue

Wireless
Cable
Media
Corporate items and

8,343
3,894
2,153

7,916
3,871
2,146

intercompany eliminations

(247)

(231)

Revenue
Total service revenue 2

Adjusted EBITDA 3
Wireless
Cable
Media
Corporate items and

14,143 13,702
13,560 13,027

3,542
1,819
127

3,262
1,773
159

9
3
(20)

intercompany eliminations

(170)

(163)

4

Adjusted EBITDA 3
Adjusted EBITDA margin 3

Net income
Adjusted net income 3

6
5,031
5,318
37.6% 36.7% 0.9 pts

1,711
1,768

835
1,432

105
23

1 Amounts calculated on a basis consistent with our previous revenue recognition

accounting policies prior to adopting IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.

2 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
3 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, and adjusted net income are non-GAAP
measures and should not be considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP
measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS and do not have standard
meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other companies. See
“Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we
calculate them.

5
1
–

7

3
4

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Revenue
Consolidated revenue increased by 3% in 2017, reflecting revenue
growth of 5% in Wireless, and marginal increases in Cable and
Media. Wireless revenue increased as a result of the continued
adoption of Rogers Share Everything plans. Cable revenue
increased by 1% as the increase in Internet revenue from a larger
subscriber base and subscriber movement to higher-end speed
and usage tiers was partially offset by the decrease in Television
subscribers and the impact of Phone pricing packages. Media
revenue increased marginally as a result of higher sports-related
revenue driven by the strength of Sportsnet, increased sales at TSC,
and higher conventional broadcast TV advertising revenue, partially
offset by lower publishing-related revenue due to the strategic shift
to digital media announced in 2016.

Adjusted EBITDA
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA increased in 2017 to $5,318 million,
reflecting increases in Wireless and Cable, partially offset by a
decrease in Media. Wireless adjusted EBITDA increased 9% as a
result of the continued adoption of higher-rate service plans,
partially offset by higher service costs associated with increased
volumes and costs of devices. Cable adjusted EBITDA increased by
3% in 2017 as a result of strong Internet revenue growth and
various cost efficiency and productivity initiatives. Media adjusted
EBITDA decreased primarily as a result of a higher Toronto Blue
Jays payroll (including the impact of foreign exchange) and higher
TSC merchandise costs partially offset by the increase in revenue as
described above.

Net income and adjusted net income
Net income increased to $1,711 million in 2017 from $835 million
in 2016 primarily as a result of the impairment and related charges
we recognized in 2016 as a result of our decision to discontinue
developing our legacy IPTV product and develop a long-term
relationship with Comcast and deploy their X1 IP-based video
platform as Ignite TV, lower restructuring, acquisition and other
costs, and prior year equity losses associated with the wind-down of
shomi.

Adjusted net income increased to $1,768 million in 2017 from
$1,432 million in 2016 as a result of a higher adjusted EBITDA and
lower depreciation and amortization, partially offset by higher
income tax expense.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

41

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

QUARTERLY RESULTS

Below is a summary of our quarterly consolidated financial results and key performance indicators for 2018 and 2017.

QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY

2018

2017 1

(In millions of dollars, except per share amounts)

Full Year

Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1

Full Year

Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1

Revenue

Wireless
Cable
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations

9,200
3,932
2,168
(204)

2,464
989
540
(55)

2,331
983
488
(33)

2,214
991
608
(57)

2,191
969
532
(59)

8,569
3,894
2,153
(247)

2,288
981
526
(64)

2,203
977
516
(50)

2,076
976
637
(69)

2,002
960
474
(64)

Total revenue
Total service revenue 2

15,096
12,974

3,938
3,276

3,769
3,271

3,756
3,300

3,633
3,127

14,369
12,550

3,731
3,164

3,646
3,196

3,620
3,221

3,372
2,969

Adjusted EBITDA
Wireless
Cable
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations

Adjusted EBITDA 3

Deduct (add):

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of property, plant and

equipment

Restructuring, acquisition and other
Finance costs
Other (income) expense

Net income before income tax expense

Income tax expense

Net income

Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

Net income
Add (deduct):

Restructuring, acquisition and other
Loss on bond forward derivatives
Loss on repayment of long-term debt
(Recovery) loss on wind-down of shomi
Gain on disposition of property, plant and

equipment

Income tax impact of above items
Income tax adjustment, legislative tax change

Adjusted net income 3

Adjusted earnings per share 3:

Basic
Diluted

Capital expenditures
Cash provided by operating activities
Free cash flow 3

4,090
1,874
196
(177)

1,028
489
40
(36)

1,099
490
73
(42)

1,029
462
60
(47)

934
433
23
(52)

3,726
1,819
127
(170)

965
477
37
(43)

1,017
471
61
(46)

915
455
59
(40)

829
416
(30)
(41)

5,983

1,521

1,620

1,504

1,338

5,502

1,436

1,503

1,389

1,174

2,211

564

558

545

544

2,142

531

531

535

545

(16)
210
793
(32)

2,817
758

2,059

–
94
205
(26)

684
182

502

(5)
47
176
15

829
235

594

–
26
193
2

738
200

538

(11)
43
219
(23)

566
141

425

(49)
152
746
(19)

2,530
685

1,845

–
31
184
3

687
188

499

–
59
183
20

710
202

508

(49)
34
189
(31)

711
183

528

–
28
190
(11)

422
112

310

$ 4.00 $ 0.97 $ 1.15 $ 1.04 $ 0.83
$ 3.99 $ 0.97 $ 1.15 $ 1.04 $ 0.80

$ 3.58 $ 0.97 $ 0.99 $ 1.03 $ 0.60
$ 3.57 $ 0.97 $ 0.98 $ 1.02 $ 0.60

2,059

502

594

538

425

1,845

499

508

528

310

210
21
28
–

(16)
(61)
–

94
21
–
–

–
(32)
–

47
–
–
–

(5)
(11)
–

26
–
–
–

–
(10)
–

43
–
28
–

(11)
(8)
–

152
–
–
(20)

(49)
(28)
2

31
–
–
–

–
(7)
2

59
–
–
–

–
(16)
–

34
–
–
(20)

(49)
3
–

28
–
–
–

–
(8)
–

2,241

585

625

554

477

1,902

525

551

496

330

$ 4.35 $ 1.14 $ 1.21 $ 1.08 $ 0.93
$ 4.34 $ 1.13 $ 1.21 $ 1.07 $ 0.90
605
885
384

2,790
4,288
1,771

657
1,048
562

700
1,304
550

828
1,051
275

$ 3.69 $ 1.02 $ 1.07 $ 0.96 $ 0.64
$ 3.68 $ 1.02 $ 1.07 $ 0.96 $ 0.64
486
596
325

658
1,377
523

841
1,142
230

2,436
3,938
1,685

451
823
607

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”.
2 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
3 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share, and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered as substitutes
or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS, and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other companies.
See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we calculate them.

42

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

FOURTH QUARTER 2018 RESULTS
Results commentary in “Fourth Quarter 2018 Results” compares
the fourth quarter of 2018 with the fourth quarter of 2017.

Higher revenue
Consolidated revenue increased 6% in the fourth quarter, largely
driven by Wireless service revenue growth of 5%.

Growth in Wireless was a result of our balanced approach to
continue monetizing the increasing demand for data along with a
disciplined approach around subscriber base management.
Wireless equipment revenue grew 17% in the fourth quarter driven
by an increase in sales of higher value devices and increased
hardware upgrades.

Cable revenue increased 1% in the fourth quarter as Internet
revenue growth of 6% continued to drive the Cable segment. This
quarter, we had net additions of 25,000 for Internet.

Media revenue increased 3% in the fourth quarter primarily as a
result of higher advertising and sports-related revenue.

Higher adjusted EBITDA
In the fourth quarter, adjusted EBITDA increased 6%, driven by
Wireless adjusted EBITDA growth of 7%, as a result of strong
growth in Wireless revenue, partially offset by investments in our
frontline employees.

Cable adjusted EBITDA increased 3% in the fourth quarter primarily
from the ongoing product mix shift to higher-margin Internet
services and various cost efficiencies achieved.

Media adjusted EBITDA increased 8% in the fourth quarter
primarily as a result of increased revenue.

Net income and higher adjusted net income
Net income and adjusted net income increased in the fourth
quarter by 1% and 11%, respectively, as a result of higher adjusted
EBITDA, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization.

QUARTERLY TRENDS AND SEASONALITY
Our operating results generally vary from quarter to quarter as a
result of changes in general economic conditions and seasonal
reportable
things,
fluctuations, among other
segments. This means our results in one quarter are not necessarily
indicative of how we will perform in a future quarter. Wireless,
Cable, and Media each have unique seasonal aspects to, and
certain other historical trends in, their businesses.

in each of our

Fluctuations in net income from quarter to quarter can also be
attributed to losses on the repayment of debt, foreign exchange
gains or losses, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments,
other income and expenses, impairment of assets, and changes in
income tax expense.

• decreasing postpaid churn, which we believe is beginning to
reflect the realization of our enhanced customer service efforts;
and

• higher roaming revenue as a result of customers increasingly
utilizing our Roam Like Home and Fido Roam services; partially
offset by

• decreasing voice revenue as rate plans increasingly incorporate
more monthly minutes and calling features, such as long
distance.

The trends in Wireless adjusted EBITDA reflect:
• higher wireless device subsidies that offset the higher wireless
to higher-cost

as more consumers

shift

device sales
smartphones; and

• higher voice and data costs related to the increasing number of

subscribers.

We continue to target organic growth in higher-value postpaid
subscribers. We have maintained a relatively stable mix of postpaid
and prepaid subscribers. Prepaid plans are evolving to have
properties similar to those of traditional postpaid plans. We believe
this evolution provides consumers with greater choice of
subscribing to a postpaid or prepaid service plan. Growth in our
customer base over time has resulted in higher costs for customer
service, retention, credit, and collection; however, most of the cost
increases have been offset by gains in operating efficiencies.

Wireless operating results are influenced by the timing of our
marketing and promotional expenditures and higher levels of
subscriber additions and related subsidies, resulting in higher
subscriber acquisition- and activation-related expenses, typically in
the third and fourth quarters. Conversely, periods with higher
activity may adversely impact subscriber churn metrics as a result of
heightened competitive activity. The third and fourth quarters
typically experience higher volumes of activity as a result of “back to
school”
season-related consumer behaviour.
Aggressive promotional offers are often advertised during these
periods and also contribute to the impact on subscriber metrics. In
contrast, we typically see lower subscriber additions in the first
quarter of the year.

and holiday

The launch of popular new wireless device models can also affect
the level of subscriber activity. Highly-anticipated device launches
typically occur in the fall season of each year. Wireless roaming
revenue is dependent on customer travel volumes and timing,
which is impacted by the foreign exchange rate of the Canadian
dollar and general economic conditions.

Our adoption of IFRS 15 has a significant impact on the timing of
recognition and classification of our Wireless results. It does not
affect our cash flows from operations or methods and underlying
economics through which we transact with our customers. See
“Accounting Policies” for more information.

Wireless
The trends in Wireless revenue and adjusted EBITDA reflect:
• the growing number of wireless voice and data subscribers;
• higher usage of wireless data;
• higher wireless device sales as more consumers shift

smartphones;

Cable
The trends in Cable service revenue primarily reflect:
• higher

Internet subscription fees as customers increasingly
including those with

upgrade to higher-tier speed plans,
unlimited usage;

to

• general pricing increases; and

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

43

 
 
 
Seasonal fluctuations relate to:
• periods of increased consumer activity and their impact on
advertising and related retail cycles, which tend to be most active
in the fourth quarter due to holiday spending and slower in the
first quarter;

• the MLB season, where:

• games played are concentrated in the spring, summer, and
fall months (generally the second and third quarters of the
year);

• revenue related to game day ticket sales, merchandise sales,
and advertising are concentrated in the spring, summer, and
fall months (generally the second and third quarters of the
year), with postseason games commanding a premium in
advertising revenue and additional revenue from game day
ticket sales and merchandise sales, if and when the Toronto
Blue Jays play in the postseason; and

• programming and production costs and player payroll are
expensed based on the number of games aired or played, as
applicable; and
• the NHL season, where:

• regular season games are concentrated in the fall and winter
months (generally the first and fourth quarters of the year) and
playoff games are concentrated in the spring months
(generally the second quarter of the year). We expect a
correlation between the quality of revenue and earnings and
the extent of Canadian teams’ presence during the playoffs;
• programming and production costs are expensed based on
the timing of when the rights are aired or are expected to be
consumed; and

• advertising revenue and programming expenses

are
concentrated in the fall, winter, and spring months, with
playoff games commanding a premium in advertising
revenue.

Other expenses
Depreciation and amortization has been trending upward over the
past several years as a result of an increase in our general
depreciable asset base, related significantly to our recent rollout
and expansion of our wireless network. This is a direct result of
increasing capital expenditures in previous and current years as we
worked to upgrade our wireless network, purchase customer
premise equipment, and roll out Ignite TV, Ignite Gigabit Internet,
and 4K TV to our Cable footprint. We expect future depreciation
and amortization to align with ongoing capital expenditures.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

• shift of enterprise customers from lower-margin, off-net legacy
long distance and data services
to higher-margin, next
generation services and data centre businesses; partially offset
by

• competitive losses of Television subscribers;
• Television subscribers downgrading their service plans; and
• lower additional usage of

Internet, Television, and Phone
products and services as service plans are increasingly bundling
more features, such as unlimited usage or a greater number of
TV channels.

The trends in Cable adjusted EBITDA primarily reflect:
• higher Internet operating margins, as a result of the shift from
conventional Television to Internet services; partially offset by

• higher premium supplier

fees in Television as a result of

bundling more value-added offerings into our Cable products.

Cable’s operating results are affected by modest seasonal
fluctuations in subscriber additions and disconnections, typically
caused by:
• university and college students who live in residences moving
out early in the second quarter and canceling their service as well
as students moving in late in the third quarter and signing up for
cable service;

• individuals

temporarily
vacations or seasonal relocations; and

suspending service for extended

• the concentrated marketing we generally conduct in our fourth

quarter.

Cable operating results are also influenced by trends in cord
shaving and cord cutting, which has resulted in fewer subscribers
watching traditional cable television, as well as a lower number of
Television subscribers. In addition, trends in the use of wireless
products and Internet or social media as substitutes for traditional
home phone products have resulted in fewer Phone subscribers.
Cable results from our enterprise customers do not generally have
any unique seasonal aspects.

Media
The trends in Media’s results are generally the result of:
• fluctuations in advertising and consumer market conditions;
• subscriber rate increases;
• higher sports and rights costs, including increases as we move

further along in our NHL Agreement; and

• continual investment in primetime and specialty programming
relating to both our broadcast networks (such as City) and our
specialty channels (such as FX (Canada)).

44

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As at December 31
(In millions of dollars)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable

Inventories
Current portion of contract assets
Other current assets
Current portion of derivative instruments

2017

2018

(restated) 1 $ Chg % Chg

Explanation of significant changes

405
2,259

466
1,052
436
270

–
2,035

405
224

435
820
414
421

31
232
22
(151)

–
11

7
28
5

See “Sources and Uses of Cash”.
Reflects an increase in trade receivables driven by increased revenue and
certain other accruals.
n/m
Reflects net increases in contracts with customers.
n/m

(36) Primarily reflects the settlement of the debt derivatives pertaining to the
repayment of our US$1.4 billion senior notes. See “Financial Risk
Management”.

Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment

4,888
11,780

4,125
11,143

763
637

18
6

Primarily reflects capital expenditures, partially offset by depreciation
expense. See “Capital Expenditures”.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Intangible assets
Investments
Derivative instruments

Contract assets
Other long-term assets
Deferred tax assets
Goodwill

7,205
2,134
1,339

535
132
–
3,905

7,244
2,561
953

(39)
(427)
386

413
143
3
3,905

122
(11)
(3)
–

(1) Reflects the amortization of intangible assets.

(17) Primarily reflects fair value decreases for certain publicly traded investments.
Primarily reflects changes in market values of our debt and expenditure
41
derivatives as a result of the depreciation of the Cdn$ relative to the US$. See
“Financial Risk Management”.
Reflects net increases in contracts with customers.

30
(8) n/m
(100) n/m
n/m

–

Total assets

31,918

30,490 1,428

5

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Current liabilities:
Bank advances
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Income tax payable
Other current liabilities
Contract liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt

–
2,255
3,052

177
132
233
900

6
1,585
2,931

62
132
278
1,756

(6)
670
121

115
–
(45)
(856)

Current portion of derivative instruments

87

133

(46)

n/m See “Sources and Uses of Cash”.

42
4

185
–

Reflects additional borrowings under our US CP program.
Primarily reflects an overall increase in trade payables as a result of the timing
of payments made.
Reflects the timing of tax installments.
n/m

(16) Reflects lower customer deposits at the Toronto Blue Jays.
(49) Reflects the repayment of our US$1.4 billion senior notes in April 2018,

partially offset by the reclassification from long-term of a total of $900 million
in senior notes due in 2019.

(35) Primarily reflects changes in market values of our expenditure derivatives, as a
result of the depreciation of the Cdn$ relative to the US$. See “Financial Risk
Management”.

Total current liabilities
Provisions
Long-term debt

6,836
35
13,390

6,883
35
12,692

(47)
–
698

(1)
–
5

n/m
Primarily reflects the issuance of US$750 million of senior notes and foreign
exchange revaluation, partially offset by the reclassification to current of a
total of $900 million in senior notes.

Derivative instruments

22

147

(125)

(85) Reflects changes in market values of our debt derivatives, primarily as a result
of the depreciation of the Cdn$ relative to the US$. See “Financial Risk
Management”.

Other long-term liabilities

546

613

(67)

(11) Primarily reflects a decrease in our net pension liability as a result of an

Deferred tax liabilities

2,910

2,624

286

11

Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity

23,739
8,179

22,994
7,496

745
683

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

31,918

30,490 1,428

3
9

5

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.

increase in the fair value of the plan assets.
Primarily reflects an increase in temporary differences between the
accounting and tax bases for certain assets.

Reflects changes in retained earnings and equity reserves.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

45

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Managing Our Liquidity and Financial Resources

SOURCES AND USES OF CASH

OPERATING, INVESTING, AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

(In millions of dollars)

Cash provided by operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital items, income taxes paid,

and interest paid

Change in non-cash operating working capital items

Cash provided by operating activities before income taxes paid and interest paid

Income taxes paid
Interest paid

Cash provided by operating activities

Investing activities:

Capital expenditures
Additions to program rights
Changes in non-cash working capital related to capital expenditures and intangible assets
Acquisitions and other strategic transactions, net of cash acquired
Other

Cash used in investing activities

Financing activities:

Net proceeds received on short-term borrowings
Net repayment of long-term debt
Net proceeds (payments) on settlement of debt derivatives and forward contracts
Transaction costs incurred
Dividends paid

Years ended December 31

2018

5,498
(114)

5,384
(370)
(726)

4,288

(2,790)
(54)
(125)
–
25

(2,944)

508
(823)
388
(18)
(988)

(933)

411
(6)

405

2017
(restated) 1

5,312
(164)

5,148
(475)
(735)

3,938

(2,436)
(59)
109
(184)
(60)

(2,630)

858
(1,034)
(79)
–
(988)

(1,243)

65
(71)

(6)

Cash used in financing activities

Change in cash and cash equivalents
Bank advances, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents (bank advances), end of year

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
The increase in cash provided by operating activities this year was a
result of higher net income, lower income taxes paid, and lower net
investment in non-cash working capital.

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures
We spent a net amount of $2,790 million this year on property,
plant and equipment before related changes in non-cash working
capital
items, which was 15% higher than 2017. See “Capital
Expenditures” for more information.

Acquisitions and other strategic transactions
We did not make any material acquisitions or other strategic
transactions in 2018. In June 2017, upon receipt of all necessary
regulatory approvals, we acquired an AWS-1 spectrum licence from
Quebecor Inc., pursuant to an existing agreement, by paying
$184 million. Upon acquisition, we recognized the spectrum
licence as an intangible asset of $184 million, which included
directly attributable costs. The spectrum licence provides us with
more wireless capacity in the Greater Toronto Area.

46

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
We received net amounts of $55 million for the year ended
December 31, 2018 (2017 – repaid net amounts of $255 million)
on our short-term borrowings,
long-term debt, and related
derivatives. See “Financial Risk Management” for more information
on the cash flows relating to our derivative instruments.

Short-term borrowings
Our short-term borrowings consist of amounts outstanding under
our accounts receivable securitization program and under our US
CP program. Below is a summary of our short-term borrowings as
at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Accounts receivable securitization

program

US commercial paper program

Total short-term borrowings

650
1,605

2,255

650
935

1,585

The table below summarizes the activity relating to our short-term borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Proceeds received from US commercial paper
Repayment of US commercial paper

Net proceeds received from US commercial paper

Proceeds received from accounts receivable securitization
Repayment of accounts receivable securitization

Net repayment of accounts receivable securitization

Net proceeds received on short-term borrowings

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

15,262
(14,858)

1.29
1.30

19,752
(19,244)

8,267
(7,530)

1.30
1.29

508

225
(225)

–

508

10,712
(9,704)

1,008

530
(680)

(150)

858

In March 2017, we entered into a US CP program that allowed us
to issue up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of
US$1 billion.
In December 2017, we increased the maximum
aggregate principal amount allowed under our US CP program to
US$1.5 billion. Funds can be borrowed under this program with
terms to maturity ranging from 1 to 397 days, subject to ongoing
market conditions. Any issuances made under the US CP program
will be issued at a discount. The obligations of RCI under the US CP

program are unsecured and guaranteed by RCCI, and rank equally
in right of payment with all our senior notes and debentures. See
“Financial Condition” for more information.

Concurrent with our US CP issuances, we entered into debt
derivatives to hedge the foreign currency risk associated with the
principal and interest components of the borrowings under our US
CP program. See “Financial Risk Management”
for more
information.

Long-term debt
Our long-term debt consists of amounts outstanding under our bank and letter of credit facilities and the senior notes and debentures we
have issued. The tables below summarize the activity relating to our long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Credit facility borrowings (Cdn$)
Credit facility borrowings (US$)

Total credit facility borrowings

Credit facility repayments (Cdn$)
Credit facility repayments (US$)

Total credit facility repayments

Net repayments under credit facilities

Senior notes issuances (US$)

Senior notes repayments (Cdn$)
Senior notes repayments (US$)

Total senior notes repayments

Net repayment of senior notes

Net repayment of long-term debt

125

1.26

(125)

1.26

–
157

157

–
(157)

(157)

–

750

1.25

938

(1,400)

1.26

–
(1,761)

(1,761)

(823)

(823)

960

1.32

(1,110)

1.31

–

–

–

–

1,730
1,269

2,999

(1,830)
(1,453)

(3,283)

(284)

–

(750)
–

(750)

(750)

(1,034)

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

The revolving credit facility is unsecured, guaranteed by RCCI, and
ranks equally with all of our senior notes and debentures.

Long-term debt net of transaction costs,

beginning of year

Net repayment of long-term debt
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange
Deferred transaction costs incurred
Amortization of deferred transaction

costs

Long-term debt net of transaction costs,

end of year

14,448
(823)
672
(18)

16,080
(1,034)
(608)
(3)

11

13

14,290

14,448

On April 13, 2018, we repaid the entire outstanding principal
amount of our US$1.4 billion ($1.8 billion) 6.8% senior notes that
were originally due in August 2018. At
the
associated debt derivatives were settled for net proceeds received
of $0.3 billion. As a result, we repaid a net amount of $1.5 billion,
including settlement of the associated debt derivatives, which was
separately funded through our US CP program and our bank credit
facility. See “Financial Condition” for more information.

the same time,

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

47

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Issuance of senior notes and related debt derivatives
Below is a summary of the senior notes that we issued in 2018, with the proceeds used to repay long-term debt maturing in 2018 and for
general corporate purposes. We did not issue any senior notes in 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except interest rates and discounts)

Date issued

2018 issuances

February 8, 2018

Principal
amount

Due
date

Interest
rate

Discount/premium
at issuance

Total gross
proceeds 1
(Cdn$)

Transaction costs
and discounts 2
(Cdn$)

US

750

2048

4.300%

99.398%

938

16

1 Gross proceeds before transaction costs, discounts, and premiums.
2 Transaction costs, discounts, and premiums are included as deferred transaction costs and discounts in the carrying value of the long-term debt, and recognized in net income

using the effective interest method.

The senior notes issued in 2018 were issued pursuant to a public
offering in the US.

FREE CASH FLOW

Concurrent with the 2018 issuance, we entered into debt
derivatives to convert all interest and principal payment obligations
on the senior notes to Canadian dollars. See “Financial Risk
Management” for more information.

The notes issued in 2018 are unsecured and guaranteed by RCCI,
ranking equally with all of our other unsecured senior notes and
debentures, bank credit facilities, and letter of credit facilities.

Repayment of senior notes and related derivative settlements
Below is a summary of the repayment of our senior notes during
2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars)

Adjusted EBITDA 2
Deduct (add):

Capital expenditures 3
Interest on borrowings, net of

capitalized interest

Net change in contract asset and
deferred commission cost asset
balances

Cash income taxes 4

Free cash flow 2

Years ended December 31

2017

2018

(restated) 1 % Chg

5,983

2,790

689

363
370

1,771

5,502

2,436

722

184
475

1,685

9

15

(5)

97
(22)

5

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

(In millions of dollars)

Policies”.

Maturity date

2018 repayments
April 2018

2017 repayments
March 2017
June 2017

Total for 2017

Notional
amount
(US$)

Notional
amount
(Cdn$)

2 Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be
considered as substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined
terms under IFRS, and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way
to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about
these measures, including how we calculate them.

3 Includes additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds on disposition,

1,400

1,761

but does not include expenditures for spectrum licences.

4 Cash income taxes are net of refunds received.

–
–

–

250
500

750

The 5% increase in free cash flow this year was primarily a result of:
• higher adjusted EBITDA; partially offset by
• higher capital expenditures.

There were no debt derivatives associated with the 2017
repayments.

Dividends
In 2018, we declared and paid dividends on each of our
outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares. We
paid $988 million in cash dividends. See “Dividends and Share
Information” for more information.

Shelf prospectuses
We have two shelf prospectuses that qualify the offering of debt
securities from time to time. One shelf prospectus qualifies the
public offering of up to $4 billion of our debt securities in each of
the provinces of Canada (Canadian Shelf) and the other shelf
prospectus (together with a corresponding registration statement
filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission) qualifies
the public offering of up to US$4 billion of our debt securities in
the United States and Ontario (US Shelf). Both the Canadian Shelf
and the US Shelf will expire in May 2020.

Effective January 1, 2019, we will redefine free cash flow such that
we will no longer adjust for the “net change in contract asset and
deferred commission cost asset balances” as outlined in the table
below. We will redefine free cash flow to simplify this measure and
we believe removing it will make us more comparable within our
industry. This item was added on a transitional basis following our
adoption of IFRS 15 to help stakeholders understand the impact
this standard had on our results. The below table shows the effect
this change will have on our free cash flow for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars)

Free cash flow as reported 1
Add:

Net change in contract asset and
deferred commission cost asset
balances

Free cash flow (redefined) 1

Years ended December 31

2018

2017 % Chg

1,771

1,685

363

184

2,134

1,869

5

97

14

1 Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered a substitute or
alternative for GAAP measures. This is not a defined term under IFRS and does not
have a standard meaning, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other
companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for
this measure,
including how we calculate it.

information about

48

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

FINANCIAL CONDITION

LIQUIDITY
Below is a summary of our total available liquidity under our bank credit facilities, letters of credit facilities, and short-term borrowings.

As at December 31, 2018
(In millions of dollars)

Bank credit facilities:
Revolving
Outstanding letters of credit
Bank advances

Total bank credit facilities
Accounts receivable securitization
Cash and cash equivalents

Total

As at December 31, 2017
(In millions of dollars)

Bank credit facilities:
Revolving
Outstanding letters of credit
Bank advances

Total bank credit facilities
Accounts receivable securitization

Total

Total available

Drawn

Letters of credit US CP program Net available

3,200
982
–

4,182
1,050
405

5,637

–
–
–

–
650
–

650

9
982
–

991
–
–

991

1,605
–
–

1,605
–

1,605

1,586
–
–

1,586
400
405

2,391

Total available

Drawn

Letters of credit US CP Program Net available

3,200
87
–

3,287
1,050

4,337

–
–
6

6
650

656

9
87
–

96
–

96

935
–
–

935
–

935

2,256
–
(6)

2,250
400

2,650

In addition to the noted sources of available liquidity, we held
$1,051 million of marketable securities
in publicly traded
companies as at December 31, 2018 (2017 – $1,465 million).

agreements. Throughout 2018, these covenants did not impose
restrictions of any material consequence on our operations.

Weighted average cost of borrowings
Our borrowings had a weighted average cost of 4.45% as at
December 31, 2018 (2017 – 4.70%) and a weighted average term
to maturity of 10.7 years (2017 – 9.9 years).

COVENANTS
The provisions of our $3.2 billion revolving bank credit facility
described in “Sources and Uses of Cash”
impose certain
restrictions on our operations and activities, the most significant of
which are leverage-related maintenance tests. As at December 31,
2018 and 2017, we were in compliance with all financial covenants,
financial ratios, and all of the terms and conditions of our debt

CREDIT RATINGS
Credit ratings provide an independent measure of credit quality of
an issue of securities and can affect our ability to obtain short-term
and long-term financing and the terms of the financing. If rating
agencies lower the credit ratings on our debt, particularly a
downgrade below investment-grade, it could adversely affect our
cost of financing and access to liquidity and capital.

We have engaged each of S&P Global Ratings Services (S&P),
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) to
rate certain of our public debt issues. Below is a summary of the
credit ratings on RCI’s outstanding senior notes and debentures
(long-term) and US CP (short-term) as at December 31, 2018.

Issuance

S&P

Moody’s

Fitch

Corporate credit issuer default rating 1
Senior unsecured debt 1
US commercial paper 1

BBB+ with a stable outlook
BBB+ with a stable outlook
A-2

Baa1 with a stable outlook
Baa1 with a stable outlook
P-2

BBB+ with a stable outlook
BBB+ with a stable outlook
N/A 2

1 Unchanged for the year.
2 We have not sought a rating from Fitch for our short-term obligations.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

49

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Ratings for long-term debt instruments across the universe of
composite rates range from AAA (S&P and Fitch) or Aaa (Moody’s),
representing the highest quality of securities rated, to D (S&P),
Substantial Risk (Fitch), and C (Moody’s) for the lowest quality of
securities rated.
ratings are generally
considered to range from BBB- (S&P and Fitch) or Baa3 (Moody’s)
to AAA (S&P and Fitch) or Aaa (Moody’s).

Investment-grade credit

Ratings for short-term debt instruments across the universe of
composite rates ranges from A-1+ (S&P), F1+ (Fitch), or P-1
(Moody’s), representing the highest quality of securities rated, to C
(S&P and Fitch), and not prime (Moody’s) for the lowest quality of
securities rated.
ratings are generally
considered to be ratings of at least A-3 (S&P), F3 (Fitch), or P-3
(Moody’s) quality or higher.

Investment-grade credit

Credit ratings are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell
securities, nor are they a comment on market price or investor
suitability. There is no assurance that a rating will remain in effect for
a given period, or that a rating will not be revised or withdrawn
entirely by a rating agency if it believes circumstances warrant it.
The ratings on our senior debt provided by S&P, Fitch, and
Moody’s are investment-grade ratings.

PENSION OBLIGATIONS
Our defined benefit pension plans had a net funding deficit of
approximately $365 million as at December 31, 2018 (2017 – $452
million). During 2018, our net
funding deficit decreased by
$87 million primarily as a result of a net increase in the plan assets.

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

We made a total of $148 million (2017 – $145 million) of
contributions to our pension plans this year. We expect our total
estimated funding requirements for our funded defined benefit
pension plans to be $177 million in 2019 and to be adjusted
annually thereafter based on various market factors, such as interest
rates, expected returns, and staffing assumptions.

Changes in factors such as the discount rate, participation rates,
increases in compensation, and the expected return on plan assets
can affect the accrued benefit obligation, pension expense, and
the deficiency of plan assets over accrued obligations in the future.
See “Accounting Policies” for more information.

Purchase of annuities
lump-sum
From time to time, we have made additional
contributions to our pension plans, and the pension plans have
purchased annuities from insurance companies to fund the
pension benefit obligations for certain groups of retired employees
in the plans. Purchasing the annuities relieves us of our primary
responsibility for that portion of the accrued benefit obligations for
the retired employees and eliminates the significant risk associated
with the obligations.

We did not make any additional lump-sum contributions to our
pension plans in 2018 or 2017, and the pension plans did not
purchase additional annuities.

We use derivative instruments from time to time to manage risks related to our business activities, summarized as follows:

Derivative

The risk they manage

Types of derivative instruments

Debt derivatives

Impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on
principal and interest payments for US dollar-
denominated senior notes and debentures, credit
facility
paper
and
borrowings

borrowings,

commercial

Cross-currency interest rate exchange agreements

Forward foreign exchange agreements (from
time to time as necessary)

Bond forwards

Expenditure derivatives

Equity derivatives

Impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on
forecast interest payments for expected long-term
debt

Impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on
forecast US dollar-denominated expenditures

Impact of fluctuations in share price on stock-based
compensation expense

Forward interest rate agreements

Forward foreign exchange agreements

Total return swap agreements

We also manage our exposure to fluctuating interest rates and we
have fixed the interest rate on 85.3% (2017 – 89.5%) of our debt,
including short-term borrowings, as at December 31, 2018.

forwards and expenditure derivatives are also designated as
hedges for accounting purposes.

We designate the debt derivatives related to our senior notes and
debentures as hedges for accounting purposes against the foreign
exchange risk associated with specific debt instruments. We do not
designate the debt derivatives related to our credit facility and US
CP borrowings as hedges for accounting purposes. Our bond

DEBT DERIVATIVES
We use cross-currency interest rate exchange agreements (debt
derivatives) to hedge the foreign exchange risk on all of the interest
and principal payment obligations of our US dollar-denominated
senior notes and debentures.

50

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

New debt derivatives to hedge new senior notes issued

US$

Hedging effect

Principal/
Notional
amount
(US$)

Maturity
date

Coupon
rate

Fixed
hedged
(Cdn$)
interest
rate 1

Equivalent
(Cdn$)

(In millions of dollars,
except interest rates)
Effective date

February 8, 2018

750

2048 4.300% 4.193%

938

1 Converting from a fixed US$ coupon rate to a weighted average Cdn$ fixed rate.

During 2017, we did not enter or settle any debt derivatives related
to senior notes.

During the year, we entered into debt derivatives related to our
credit facility and US CP borrowings as a result of a favourable
interest rate spread obtained from borrowing funds in US dollars.
We used these derivatives to offset the foreign exchange and
interest rate risk on our US dollar-denominated credit facility and
commercial paper borrowings. As a result of the short-term nature
of these debt derivatives, we have not designated them as hedges
for accounting purposes.

Below is a summary of the debt derivatives we entered and settled related to our credit facility borrowings and commercial paper program
during 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Credit facilities

Debt derivatives entered
Debt derivatives settled
Net cash paid

Commercial paper program
Debt derivatives entered
Debt derivatives settled
Net cash received (paid)

As at December 31, 2018, we had US$6.1 billion of US dollar-
denominated senior notes and debentures, all of which were
hedged using debt derivatives.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates,
percentages, and years)

US dollar-denominated long-term debt 1
Hedged with debt derivatives
Hedged exchange rate
Percent hedged 2

Amount of borrowings at fixed rates 3

Total borrowings
Total borrowings at fixed rates
Percent of borrowings at fixed rates
Weighted average interest rate on

borrowings

Weighted average term to maturity

As at December 31

2018

2017

US$ 6,050 US$ 6,700
US$ 6,050 US$ 6,700
1.1070
100.0%

1.1438
100.0%

$
$

15,320
13,070
85.3%

$
$

15,152
13,567
89.5%

4.45%
10.7 years

4.70%
9.9 years

1 US dollar-denominated long-term debt reflects the hedged exchange rate and the

hedged interest rate.

2 Pursuant

to the requirements for hedge accounting under

IFRS 9, Financial
instruments, as at December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, RCI accounted for
100% of its debt derivatives related to senior notes as hedges against designated US
dollar-denominated debt. As a result, as at December 31, 2018 and 2017, 100% of
our US dollar-denominated senior notes and debentures are hedged for accounting
and economic purposes.

3 Borrowings include long-term debt, including the impact of debt derivatives, and
short-term borrowings associated with our US CP and accounts receivable
securitization programs.

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

125
125

15,262
14,833

1.26
1.26

1.29
1.29

157
157
(1)

19,751
19,148
63

1,610
1,760

8,266
7,521

1.32
1.32

1.30
1.29

2,126
2,327
(17)

10,711
9,692
(62)

BOND FORWARDS
From time to time, we use extendible bond forward derivatives
(bond forwards) to hedge interest rate risk on the debt instruments
we expect to issue in the future. As at December 31, 2018,
approximately $5.7 billion of our outstanding public debt matures
over the next five years (2017 – $5.6 billion) and we anticipate that
we will issue public debt over that time to fund at least a portion of
those maturities together with other general corporate funding
requirements. We use bond forwards for
risk management
purposes only. The bond forwards noted below have been
designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

During 2014, we entered into bond forwards to hedge the
underlying Government of Canada (GoC) interest rate risk that will
comprise a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our
anticipated future debt issuances. As a result of these bond
forwards, we hedged the underlying GoC 10-year
rate on
$1.5 billion notional amount for anticipated future debt issuances
from 2015 to 2018 and the underlying GoC 30-year rate on
$0.4 billion notional amount for December 31, 2018. The bond
forwards are effective from December 2014.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

51

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

As at December 31, 2018 we had $900 million notional amount of bond forwards outstanding (2017 – $900 million), all of which were
designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

(In millions of dollars, except interest rates)

GoC term (years)

Effective date

Maturity date 1

Notional
amount

Hedged GoC
interest rate as at
December 31, 2018

Hedged GoC
interest rate as at
December 31, 2017 1

10
30

Total

December 2014
December 2014

January 31, 2019
February 28, 2019

500
400

900

3.01%
2.70%

2.85%
2.65%

2018

2017

500
400

900

500
400

900

1 Bond forwards with maturity dates beyond December 31, 2018 are subject to GoC rate re-setting from time to time. Both the 10-year and 30-year bond forwards were extended

in 2018 to their respective maturity dates.

During the year, we determined that we would no longer be able to exercise certain ten-year bond forward derivatives within the originally
designated time frame. Consequently, we discontinued hedge accounting on those bond forward derivatives and reclassified a
$21 million loss from the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity to finance costs. We subsequently extended the bond forwards to
May 31, 2019, with the ability to extend them further, and redesignated them as effective hedges.

EXPENDITURE DERIVATIVES
We use foreign currency forward contracts (expenditure derivatives) to hedge the foreign exchange risk on the notional amount of certain
forecast US dollar-denominated expenditures. Below is a summary of the expenditure derivatives we entered and settled to manage
foreign exchange risk related to certain forecast expenditures.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Expenditure derivatives entered

Expenditure derivatives settled

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

720

840

1.24

1.30

896

1,093

840

930

1.27

1.33

1,070

1,240

The expenditure derivatives noted above have been designated as
hedges for accounting purposes.

As at December 31, 2018, we had US$1,080 million of expenditure
derivatives outstanding (2017 – US$1,200 million), at an average
rate of $1.24/US$ (2017 – $1.28/US$), with terms to maturity
ranging from January 2019 to December 2020 (2017 – January
2018 to December 2019). As at December 31, 2018, our
outstanding expenditure derivatives maturing in 2019 are hedged
at an average exchange rate of $1.24/US$.

EQUITY DERIVATIVES
We use stock-based compensation derivatives (equity derivatives)
to hedge the market price appreciation risk of
the Class B
Non-Voting Shares granted under our stock-based compensation
programs. As at December 31, 2018, we had equity derivatives for
5.0 million (2017 – 5.4 million) Class B Non-Voting Shares with a

weighted average price of $51.54 (2017 – $51.44). These
derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting
purposes. We record changes in their fair value as a stock-based
compensation expense, or offset thereto, which serves to offset a
substantial portion of the impact of changes in the market price of
Class B Non-Voting Shares on the accrued value of the stock-based
compensation liability
stock-based compensation
programs.

for our

In 2018, we settled 0.4 million equity derivatives at a weighted
average price of $61.15 for net proceeds of $4 million. In 2017, we
settled existing equity derivatives for net proceeds of $6 million and
entered into new derivatives on 1.0 million Class B Non-Voting
Shares with an expiry date of March 2018.

We have executed extension agreements for our equity derivative
contracts under substantially the same terms and conditions with
revised expiry dates to April 2019 (from April 2018).

52

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

MARK-TO-MARKET VALUE
We record our derivatives using an estimated credit-adjusted,
mark-to-market valuation, calculated in accordance with IFRS.

As at December 31, 2018

Notional
amount
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
amount
(Cdn$)

Fair
value
(Cdn$)

(In millions of dollars, except
exchange rates)

Debt derivatives accounted for

as cash flow hedges:

As assets
As liabilities

5,500
550

1.1243
1.3389

6,184
736

1,354
(22)

Short-term debt derivatives not
accounted for as hedges:

As assets

1,178

1.3276

1,564

41

ADJUSTED NET DEBT AND DEBT LEVERAGE RATIO
We use adjusted net debt and debt leverage ratio to conduct
valuation-related analysis and make capital
structure-related
decisions. Adjusted net debt includes long-term debt, net debt
derivative assets or liabilities, short-term borrowings, and cash and
cash equivalents.

(In millions of dollars, except ratios)

Long-term debt 2
Net debt derivative assets valued without

any adjustment for credit risk 3

Short-term borrowings
(Cash and cash equivalents) bank advances

Adjusted net debt 4
Divided by: trailing 12-month adjusted

1,373

As at December 31

2017
(restated) 1

2018

14,404

14,555

(1,448)
2,255
(405)

(1,146)
1,585
6

14,806

15,000

5,983

5,502

2.5

2.7

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Net mark-to-market debt

derivative asset

Bond forwards accounted for as

cash flow hedges:
As liabilities
Expenditure derivatives

accounted for as cash flow
hedges:

As assets

Net mark-to-market

expenditure derivative asset

Equity derivatives not

accounted for as hedges:

As assets

Net mark-to-market asset

(In millions of dollars, except
exchange rates)

Debt derivatives accounted
for as cash flow hedges:

As assets
As liabilities

Short-term debt derivatives
not accounted for as
hedges:

As liabilities

Net mark-to-market debt

derivative asset

Bond forwards accounted for

as cash flow hedges:

As liabilities
Expenditure derivatives

accounted for as cash flow
hedges:

As assets
As liabilities

Net mark-to-market

expenditure derivative
liability

Equity derivatives not

accounted for as hedges:

As assets

Net mark-to-market asset

–

–

900

(87)

EBITDA 4

Debt leverage ratio 4

1,080

1.2413

1,341

122

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

122

2 Includes current and long-term portion of

long-term debt before deferred
transaction costs and discounts. See “Reconciliation of adjusted net debt” in
“Non-GAAP Measures” for the calculation of this amount.

–

–

258

92

1,500

As at December 31, 2017

Notional
amount
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
amount
(Cdn$)

Fair value
(Cdn$)

5,200
1,500

1.0401
1.3388

5,409
2,008

1,301
(149)

746

1.2869

960

(23)

3 For purposes of calculating adjusted net debt and debt leverage ratio, we believe
including debt derivatives valued without adjustment for credit risk is commonly used
to evaluate debt leverage and for market valuation and transactional purposes.

4 Adjusted net debt, adjusted EBITDA, and debt

leverage ratio are non-GAAP
measures and should not be considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP
measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS and do not have standard
meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other companies. See
“Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we
calculate them.

In addition, as at December 31, 2018, we held $1,051 million of
marketable securities in publicly traded companies (2017 – $1,465
million).

Our adjusted net debt decreased by $194 million from
December 31, 2017 as a result of:
• an increase in our net cash position; and
• a decrease in the net hedged amount of our long-term debt due

1,129

to the various repayments this year; partially offset by
• an increase in our outstanding short-term borrowings.

See “Overview of Financial Position” for more information.

–

–

900

(64)

240
960

1.2239
1.2953

294
1,243

–

–

276

5
(44)

(39)

68

1,094

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

53

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

DIVIDENDS AND SHARE INFORMATION

DIVIDENDS
Below is a summary of the dividends that have been declared and paid on our outstanding Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares.

Declaration date

Record date

January 25, 2018
April 19, 2018
August 15, 2018
October 19, 2018

January 26, 2017
April 18, 2017
August 17, 2017
October 19, 2017

March 12, 2018
June 11, 2018
September 14, 2018
December 11, 2018

March 13, 2017
June 12, 2017
September 15, 2017
December 11, 2017

Payment date

April 3, 2018
July 3, 2018
October 3, 2018
January 3, 2019

April 3, 2017
July 4, 2017
October 3, 2017
January 2, 2018

Dividend per
share (dollars)

Dividends paid
(in millions of dollars)

0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

247
247
247
247

247
247
247
247

In January 2019, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.50
per Class A Share and Class B Non-Voting Share, to be paid on
April 1, 2019, to shareholders of record on March 12, 2019.

As at February 28, 2019, 111,155,021 Class A Shares, 403,657,654
Class B Non-Voting Shares, and 2,356,547 options to purchase
Class B Non-Voting Shares were outstanding.

We use the weighted average number of shares outstanding to
calculate earnings per share and adjusted earnings per share.

Years ended December 31

(Number of shares in millions)

2018

2017

Basic weighted average number of

shares outstanding

Diluted weighted average number of

shares outstanding

515

516

515

517

We currently expect that the remaining record and payment dates
for the 2019 declaration of dividends will be as follows, subject to
the declaration by the Board each quarter at its sole discretion:

Declaration date

Record date

Payment date

April 18, 2019
June 5, 2019
October 22, 2019

June 10, 2019
September 9, 2019 October 1, 2019
January 2, 2020
December 11, 2019

July 2, 2019

NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID
In April 2018, the TSX accepted a notice of our intention to
commence a normal course issuer bid (NCIB) that allows us to
purchase, during the twelve-month period ending April 23, 2019,
the lesser of 35.8 million Class B Non-Voting Shares and that
number of Class B Non-Voting Shares that can be purchased under
the NCIB for an aggregate purchase price of $500 million. We did
not repurchase any shares under the NCIB in 2018.

OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES

As at December 31

2018

2017

Common shares outstanding 1

Class A Voting
Class B Non-Voting

111,155,637 112,407,192
403,657,038 402,403,433

Total common shares

514,812,675 514,810,625

Options to purchase Class B

Non-Voting Shares

Outstanding options
Outstanding options

exercisable

2,719,612

2,637,890

1,059,590

924,562

1 Holders of our Class B Non-Voting Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to
attend shareholder meetings; however, they are not entitled to vote at these
meetings except as required by law or stipulated by stock exchanges. If an offer is
made to purchase outstanding Class A Shares, there is no requirement under
applicable law or our constating documents that an offer be made for the
outstanding Class B Non-Voting Shares, and there is no other protection available to
shareholders under our constating documents. If an offer is made to purchase both
classes of shares, the offer for the Class A Shares may be made on different terms
than the offer to the holders of Class B Non-Voting Shares.

54

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Below is a summary of our obligations under firm contractual arrangements as at December 31, 2018. See notes 3, 21, and 27 to our 2018
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

(In millions of dollars)

Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt 1
Net interest payments
Debt derivative instruments 2
Expenditure derivative instruments 2
Bond forwards 2
Operating leases
Player contracts 3
Purchase obligations 4
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Program rights 5
Other long-term liabilities

Total

Less than
1 Year

1-3 Years

4-5 Years

2,255
900
658
(41)
(101)
87
208
63
448
75
35
667
1

5,255

–
2,350
1,141
–
(31)
–
312
8
332
86
148
1,048
24

5,418

–
2,442
913
(450)
–
–
172
14
202
47
–
1,079
5

4,424

After
5 Years

–
8,712
5,923
(884)
–
–
287
–
80
36
–
1,346
8

15,508

Total

2,255
14,404
8,635
(1,375)
(132)
87
979
85
1,062
244
183
4,140
38

30,605

1 Principal obligations of long-term debt (including current portion) due at maturity.
2 Net (receipts) disbursements due at maturity. US dollar amounts have been translated into Canadian dollars at the Bank of Canada year-end rate.
3 Player contracts are Toronto Blue Jays players’ salary contracts into which we have entered and are contractually obligated to pay.
4 Purchase obligations are the contractual obligations under service, product, and wireless device contracts to which we have committed.
5 Program rights are the agreements into which we have entered to acquire broadcasting rights for sports broadcasting programs and films for periods in excess of one year at

contract inception.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

GUARANTEES
As a regular part of our business, we enter into agreements that
provide for indemnification and guarantees to counterparties in
transactions involving business sale and business combination
agreements, sales of services, and purchases and development of
assets. Due to the nature of these indemnifications, we are unable
to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount
we could be required to pay counterparties. Historically, we have
not made any significant payment under these indemnifications or
guarantees. See note 26 to our 2018 Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements.

OPERATING LEASES
We have entered into operating leases for the rental of premises,
distribution facilities, equipment and wireless towers, and other
contracts. Terminating any single one of these lease agreements
would not have a material adverse effect on us as a whole. See
“Commitments and Contractual Obligations” and note 27 to our
2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for quantification.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

55

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Governance and Risk Management

GOVERNANCE AT ROGERS

Rogers is a family-founded, family-controlled company and we take
pride in our proactive and disciplined approach to ensuring that
our governance structure and practices instill the confidence of our
shareholders.

Voting control of Rogers Communications Inc. is held by a trust, the
beneficiaries of which are members of the Rogers family. The trust
holds voting control of RCI for the benefit of successive generations
of the Rogers family via the trust’s ownership of 92% of the
outstanding Class A Shares of RCI (2017 – 91%). The Rogers family
are substantial stakeholders and owned approximately 27% of our
through its
equity as at December 31, 2018 (2017 – 27%)
ownership of a combined total of 141 million Class A Shares and
Class B Non-Voting Shares (2017 – 141 million).

The Board is made up of four members of the Rogers family and
another eleven directors who bring a rich mix of experience as
business leaders in North America. All of our directors are firmly
committed to firm governance, strong oversight, and the ongoing
creation of shareholder value. The Board as a whole is committed
to sound corporate governance and continually reviews its
governance
them against
acknowledged leaders and evolving legislation. The Board believes
that Rogers’ governance system is effective and that there are
appropriate structures and procedures in place.

benchmarks

practices

and

GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES
The majority of our directors are independent and we have
adopted many best practices for effective governance, including:
• separation of the CEO and Chair roles;
• an independent lead director;
• formal corporate governance policies and charters;
• a code of business conduct and whistleblower hotline;
• director share ownership guidelines;
• Board and committee in camera discussions;
• annual reviews of Board and Committee performance;
• Audit and Risk Committee meetings with internal and external

auditors;

• an orientation program for new directors;
• regular Board education sessions;
• committee authority to retain independent advisors; and
• director material relationship standards.

We comply with all relevant corporate governance guidelines and
standards as a Canadian public company listed on the TSX and as a
foreign private issuer listed on the NYSE in the US.

56

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

BOARD OVERSIGHT
The Board delegates certain responsibilities to its seven standing
committees to ensure proper oversight and accountability:
• Audit and Risk Committee – reviews our accounting policies and
practices, the integrity of our financial reporting processes and
procedures, and the financial statements and other relevant
disclosure for release to shareholders and the public. It assists
the Board in its oversight of our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements for financial reporting, assesses our
accounting and financial control systems, and evaluates the
qualifications,
independence, and work of our internal and
external auditors. It also reviews risk management policies and
associated processes used to manage major risk exposures.

• Corporate Governance Committee – assists the Board to ensure
it has appropriate systems and procedures for carrying out its
responsibilities. This committee develops governance policies
and practices, recommends them to the Board for approval, and
leads the Board in its periodic review of Board and committee
performance.

• Nominating Committee – identifies prospective candidates to
serve on the Board. Nominated directors are either elected by
shareholders at a meeting or appointed by the Board. The
committee also recommends nominees
for each Board
committee, including each committee chair.

• Human Resources Committee – assists the Board in monitoring,
reviewing, and approving compensation and benefit policies
It is also responsible for recommending the
and practices.
compensation of senior management and monitoring senior
executive succession planning.

• Executive Committee – assists the Board in discharging its
responsibilities between meetings, including acting in such areas
as are specifically designated and authorized at a preceding
Board meeting to consider matters that may arise from time to
time.

• Finance Committee – reviews our investment strategies, general
debt, and equity structure and reports on them to the Board.
• Pension Committee – oversees the administration of our retiree
pension plans and reviews the investment performance and
provisions of the plans.

You can find more details about governance at Rogers on our
Investor Relations website (investors.rogers.com), including:
• a complete statement of our corporate governance practices;
• our codes of conduct and ethics;
• full Board committee charters;
• director biographies; and
• a summary of the differences between the NYSE corporate
governance rules that apply to US-based companies and our
governance practices as a non-US-based issuer listed on the
NYSE.

Board of Directors and its Committees

Chair

Member

Audit and
Risk

Corporate
Governance

Nominating

Human
Resources

Executive

Finance

Pension

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

As at March 6, 2019

Edward S. Rogers

John H. Clappison, FCPA, FCA

Bonnie R. Brooks, CM

Robert K. Burgess

Robert Dépatie

Robert J. Gemmell

Alan D. Horn, CPA, CA

Philip B. Lind, CM

John A. MacDonald

Isabelle Marcoux

Joe Natale

The Hon. David R. Peterson, PC, QC

Loretta A. Rogers

Martha L. Rogers

Melinda M. Rogers

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
At Rogers, being a good corporate citizen is at the very heart of our
business. Corporate Social Responsibility was important to our
founder, Ted Rogers, and continues to be a core value embraced
at Rogers today.

The material aspects of our Corporate Social Responsibility
platform are grouped into six focus areas that are listed below,
along with our approaches in addressing them:

Good governance
• Governance and Ethics: We strive to uphold the highest
standards of integrity, ethical behaviour, and good corporate
citizenship, underpinned by guidelines and policies that govern
the actions of our directors and employees and promote
responsible conduct.

Customer experience
• Customer Service and Transparency: We believe in putting
customers first in everything we do; this is a core pillar of our
strategic priorities. We continue to focus on self-serve options for
our customers and we invest in training and tools for our
customer service representatives. In 2018, we began measuring
our progress in customer experience through Likelihood to
Recommend (LTR), as opposed to Net Promoter Score, to learn
how customers feel about us and our brands.

• Network Leadership and Innovation: Innovation has always been
a part of our identity, whether it is bringing new products or the
In 2018, we invested
latest network technologies to market.
$2.8 billion in capital expenditures, with much of that investment
going to our wireless and cable networks. We continue to focus
on core performance and reliability and invest in our wireless

network to prepare for
technology.

the next generation of wireless

• Product Responsibility: We have programs and policies in place
to manage a range of product responsibility issues. For instance,
we have policies in place to comply with all relevant safety
regulations and codes, have programs and teams to manage
and advise on our accessibility offerings, and operate
stewardship programs to manage the proper disposal and
recycling of our used products, including Rogers Trade-Up and
FidoTrade.

• Customer Privacy and Information Security: We actively work to
improve transparency and strive to be an industry leader in the
privacy space. Our Privacy Policy outlines our responsibilities and
practices regarding the protection of the personal information of
our employees and customers. Our Chief Privacy Officer
oversees our compliance with this policy and all applicable laws,
and responds to requests from law enforcement for customer
data.

Employee experience
• Talent Management: It is our goal to invest in building the skills,
capabilities, and careers of our people to support their success
and to make Rogers the best place to work in Canada. To
achieve this, it is important that we live our values, develop our
teams, and continue to support our employees on their career
In 2018, we achieved best-in-class employee
journeys.
engagement scores and continued to invest in our development
and training programs, our development planning process, and
our onboarding programs. Our Chief Human Resources Officer
oversees talent management, while the Human Resources
Committee assists the Board in monitoring, reviewing, and
approving compensation and benefit policies and practices.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

57

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

• Inclusion and Diversity: We aim to create an open, trusting, and
inclusive workplace where we embrace diversity of thought and
straight talk. We believe that reflecting the diversity of our
customers and communities allows us to serve them better. Our
Inclusion & Diversity Council
leaders who
oversee the development and implementation of our Inclusion &
Diversity strategy. We aim to increase representation at the
executive level for women and visible minorities, and increase
representation overall for persons with disabilities, indigenous
peoples, and LGBTQ+.

is composed of

• Safety and Wellbeing: We support our employees’ safety and
wellbeing holistically,
focusing on the whole employee,
including their physical and mental health at work and in their
lives.
In 2018, we launched Thrive, a new comprehensive
wellbeing program. We are also committed to providing and
maintaining a safe and healthy working environment
for
employees, volunteers, contractors, visitors, and members of the
general public who may be affected by our activity. Across our
safety initiatives, our goal
is always to protect people by
preventing injuries and we invest millions of dollars as well as
thousands of hours in safety training every year.

Environmental responsibility
• Energy Use and Climate Change: We operate thousands of
facilities, which include owned and leased buildings, cell
transmission sites, power supply stations, and retail stores, as well
as an extensive vehicle fleet. We continue to invest in programs
that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly as
they relate to energy use. We have targets to reduce our GHG
emissions by 25% and energy use by 10% by 2025 based on
2011 levels.

• Waste Reduction: Reducing the amount of waste we produce is
another important way in which we manage our environmental
footprint. To reduce and responsibly manage the waste we
produce, we look for opportunities to avoid waste generation,
run programs to recycle and reuse materials, and work to
increase employees’ recycling behaviours through our award-
winning “Get Up and Get Green” program.

Community investment
• Community Giving: In 2018, we provided over $60 million in
cash and in-kind community investments to support various
organizations and causes. We awarded 313 Ted Rogers
Scholarships and 105 Ted Rogers Community Grants to help
some of the brightest young leaders across the country succeed
in their educational aspirations. We also launched our first Give
Together Volunteer Days in June, with 2,500 team members
participating coast-to-coast, and raised $2.5 million through our
annual Give Together giving campaign.

• Digital Inclusion: Digital inclusion is a priority for us and one of
the best ways we can contribute to society. Our Connected for
Success program provides low-cost broadband Internet to rent-
subsidized tenants within partnered non-profit organizations and
Canadian
housing
Approximately
providers.
households are eligible for
through the
Connected for Success program, giving them the tools and
resources needed to experience the benefits of connectivity.

Internet access

200,000

58

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Economy and society
• Economic Performance: We strive to offer innovative solutions for
customers, create diverse and well-paying jobs, support small
businesses, pay our fair share of taxes, and deliver dividends to
shareholders. Beyond these direct economic impacts, our
including
performance produces indirect economic benefits,
significant charitable donations and locally procured goods and
services.

socially

and environmentally

• Supply Chain Management: Suppliers play a huge role in our
success, which is why we ensure that we have strong supplier
selection processes and management, and that we conduct
business with
responsible
companies who share our values. We have strong, sound
procurement processes and demand that our suppliers adhere
to our Supplier Code of Conduct. The Code sets our
expectations of our suppliers in terms of ethical, social, labour,
health and safety, and environmental behaviours. Through our
membership in the Joint Audit Cooperation (JAC), we share
audit findings with a group of twelve other global telecom
companies, allowing us to manage sustainability among our
suppliers.

See our annual Corporate Social Responsibility report on our
website (about.rogers.com/responsibility)
for more information
about our social and environmental performance.

INCOME TAX AND OTHER GOVERNMENT
PAYMENTS

We proactively manage our tax affairs to enhance our business
decisions and optimize after-tax free cash flow available for
investment in our business and shareholder returns. We have
comprehensive policies and procedures to ensure we are
compliant with all tax laws and reporting requirements, including
filing and making all income and sales tax returns and payments on
a timely basis. As a part of this process, we pursue open and
cooperative relationships with revenue authorities to minimize audit
effort and reduce tax uncertainty. We also engage with
government policy makers on taxation matters that affect Rogers
and its
and other
employees,
stakeholders.

shareholders,

customers,

INCOME TAX PAYMENTS
Our total income tax expense of $758 million in 2018 is close to the
expense computed on our accounting income at the statutory rate
of 26.7%. Cash income tax payments totaled $370 million in 2018.
Cash income tax payments differ from the income tax expense
shown on the financial statements for various reasons, including the
required timing of payments. The primary reason our cash income
tax is lower than our income tax expense is a result of the significant
investment we continue to make in our wireless and
capital
broadband telecommunications networks throughout Canada.
Similar to tax systems throughout the world, Canadian tax laws
permit investments in such productivity-enhancing assets to be
deducted for tax purposes more quickly than they are depreciated
for financial statement purposes.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

OTHER GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS
In addition to paying income tax on the profits we earn, we
contribute significantly to Canadians by paying taxes and fees to
federal, provincial, and municipal governments, including:
• various taxes on the salaries and wages we pay (payroll taxes) to

approximately 26,100 employees;

• property and business taxes;
• unrecoverable sales taxes and custom duties; and
• broadcast, spectrum, and other regulatory fees.

As outlined in the table below, the total cost to Rogers of these payments in 2018 was $1,070 million.

(In millions of dollars)

Income
taxes

Unrecoverable
sales taxes

Payroll
taxes

Regulatory and
spectrum fees 1

Property and
business taxes

Total taxes and
other payments

Total payments

370

9

130

513

48

1,070

1 Includes an allocation of $266 million relating to the $1.0 billion, $3.3 billion, and $24 million we paid for the acquisition of spectrum licences in 2008, 2014, and 2015,

respectively.

We also collected on behalf of the government $1,919 million in sales taxes on our products and services and $658 million in employee
payroll taxes.

RISK MANAGEMENT

We strive to continually strengthen our
risk management
capabilities to protect and enhance shareholder value. The
purpose of risk management is not to eliminate risk but to optimize
trade-offs between risk and return to maximize value to the
organization.

RISK GOVERNANCE
The Board has overall
risk governance and
responsibility for
oversees management in identifying the key risks we face in our
business and implementing appropriate risk assessment processes
It delegates certain risk oversight and
to manage these risks.
management duties to the Audit and Risk Committee.

The Audit and Risk Committee discusses risk policies with
management and the Board and assists the Board in overseeing
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit and Risk Committee also reviews:
• the adequacy of the internal controls that have been adopted to
safeguard assets from loss and unauthorized use, to prevent,
deter, and detect fraud, and to ensure the accuracy of the
financial records;

• the processes for identifying, assessing, and managing risks;
• our exposure to major risks and trends and management’s
implementation of risk policies and actions to monitor and
control these exposures, including cybersecurity;

• the implementation of new major systems and changes to

existing major systems;

• our business continuity and disaster recovery plans;
• any special audit steps adopted due to material weaknesses or

significant deficiencies that may be identified; and

• other risk management matters from time to time as determined

by the Audit and Risk Committee or directed by the Board.

accountable for managing or accepting the risks. Together, they
identify and assess key risks, define controls and action plans to
minimize these risks, and enhance our ability to meet our business
objectives.

ERM is the second line of defence. ERM helps management
identify the key risks in meeting our business objectives, our risk
appetite, and emerging risks. At the business unit and department
level, ERM works with management to provide governance and
advice in managing the key risks and associated controls to
mitigate these risks. ERM works with Internal Audit to monitor the
adequacy and effectiveness of controls to reduce risks to an
acceptable level.

ERM carries out an annual strategic risk assessment to identify our
key risks in achieving our corporate objectives by identifying
corporate, business unit, and department
risks and aligning
business unit and department objectives to the business objectives.
Using an aggregate approach, ERM identifies the key risks and the
potential impact on our ability to achieve our business objectives.
This assessment includes reviewing risk reports, audit reports, and
industry benchmarks and interviewing senior management with
business unit and department accountability. ERM reports the
results of the annual strategic risk assessment to the Executive
Leadership Team, the Audit and Risk Committee, and the Board.

Internal Audit is the third line of defence. Internal Audit evaluates
the governance
the design and operational effectiveness of
program, internal controls, and risk management. Risks, controls,
and mitigation plans
identified through this process are
incorporated into the annual Internal Audit plan. Annually, Internal
Audit also facilitates and monitors management’s completion of
the financial statement fraud risk assessment to ensure there is no
potential fraud or misstatement in our financial statements and
disclosures and to assess whether controls are adequately
designed and operating effectively.

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program uses the “3 Lines
of Defence” framework to identify, assess, manage, monitor, and
communicate risks. Our business units and departments, led by the
Executive Leadership Team, are the first line of defence and are

The Executive Leadership Team and the Audit and Risk Committee
are responsible for approving our enterprise risk policies. Our ERM
methodology and policies
rely on the expertise of our
management and employees to identify risks and opportunities
and implement risk mitigation strategies as required.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

59

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING OUR
BUSINESS

This section describes the principal risks and uncertainties that
could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
results. Any discussion about risks should be read in conjunction
with “About Forward-Looking Information”.

COMPETITIVE INTENSITY

There is no assurance that our current or future competitors will not
provide services that are superior to ours or at lower prices, adapt
more quickly to evolving industry trends or changing market
requirements, enter markets in which we operate, or introduce
competing services. Any of these factors could increase churn or
reduce our business market share or revenue.

We may have some ongoing re-pricing of products and services, as
we may need to extend lower wireless pricing offers to attract new
customers and retain existing subscribers. As wireless penetration
of the population deepens, new wireless customers may generate
lower average monthly revenue, which could slow revenue growth.

Global technology giants continue to ramp up content spending
into new markets such as sports media, resulting in increased
competition for our Media and Cable business segments. This may
result in an increase in subscriber churn as customers now have
additional choices of supplementary sources of media content.

Wireless could face increased competition with changes to foreign
ownership rules and control of wireless licences:
• foreign telecommunication companies

the
Canadian market by acquiring wireless licences or a holder of
wireless licences. If companies with significantly greater capital
it could reduce our
resources enter the Canadian market,
wireless market share. See “Foreign Ownership and Control” for
more information.

could enter

• ISED Canada’s policy regarding the transfer of spectrum
licences, combined with 2012 legislation that allows foreign
ownership of wireless providers with less than 10% market share,
could make it harder for incumbent wireless carriers to acquire
additional
regarding foreign
ownership of wireless providers could make it less expensive for
foreign wireless carriers to enter the Canadian wireless market.
This could increase the intensity of competition in the Canadian
wireless sector.

legislation

spectrum.

The

In addition, the CRTC Broadcasting Distribution Regulations do not
allow cable operators to obtain exclusive contracts in buildings
where it is technically feasible to install two or more transmission
systems.

REGULATORY RISKS

CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
Substantially all of our business activities are regulated by ISED
Canada and/or the CRTC. Any regulatory changes or decisions
could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations. See
“Regulation In Our Industry” for more information.

Regulatory changes or decisions made by these regulators could
adversely impact our
results on a consolidated basis. This
regulation relates to, among other things, licensing and related
fees, competition, the cable television programming services we

60

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

must distribute, wireless and wireline interconnection agreements,
the rates we may charge to provide access to our network by third
parties, the resale of our networks and roaming on our networks,
our operation and ownership of communications systems, and our
ability to acquire an interest in other communications systems. In
addition, the costs of providing services may be increased from
time to time as a result of compliance with industry or legislative
initiatives to address consumer protection concerns or such
Internet-related issues as copyright
infringement, unsolicited
commercial e-mail, cybercrime, and lawful access.

Generally, our licences are granted for a specified term and are
subject to conditions on the maintenance of these licences. These
licensing conditions and related fees may be modified at any time
by the regulators. The regulators may decide not to renew a licence
when it expires, and any failure by us to comply with the conditions
on the maintenance of a licence could result in a revocation or
forfeiture of any of our licences or the imposition of fines. Our
cable, wireless, and broadcasting licences generally may not be
transferred without regulatory approval.

The licences include conditions requiring us to comply with
Canadian ownership restrictions of the applicable legislation. We
are currently in compliance with all of these Canadian ownership
and control requirements. If these requirements were violated, we
would be subject to various penalties, possibly including, in the
extreme case, the loss of a licence.

tabled a Proposed Order

PROPOSED DIRECTION TO THE CRTC ON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CRTC REVIEW OF MOBILE
WIRELESS SERVICES
On February 26, 2019, the Minister of Innovation, Science and
Economic Development
Issuing a
Direction to the CRTC on Implementing the Canadian
Telecommunications Policy Objectives to Promote Competition,
Affordability, Consumer Interests and Innovation. The Direction
signals the government’s intention to require the CRTC to consider
competition, affordability, consumer interests, and innovation in its
telecommunications decisions and to demonstrate to Canadians in
those decisions that it has done so. The final Order, when in effect,
will apply to the five-year review to examine the state of the mobile
wireless market
initiated by the CRTC on February 28, 2019
through Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2019-57, Review of
mobile wireless services. Changes arising from the review may
adversely affect Rogers. See “Regulation In Our Industry” for more
information.

SPECTRUM
Radio spectrum is one of the fundamental assets required to carry
on our Wireless business. Our ability to continue to offer and
improve current services and to offer new services depends on,
among other factors, continued access to, and deployment of,
adequate spectrum, including the ability to both renew current
spectrum licences and acquire new spectrum licences.

If we cannot acquire and retain needed spectrum, we may not be
able to continue to offer and improve our current services and
including providing
deploy new services on a timely basis,
competitive data speeds our customers want. As a result, our ability
to attract and retain customers could be adversely affected.
In
addition, an inability to acquire and retain needed spectrum could
affect network quality and result in higher capital expenditures.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Changes to government spectrum fees could significantly increase
our payments and therefore materially reduce our net income.

THE WIRELESS CODE
The CRTC’s decision to implement its Wireless Code, among other
things, effectively required Canadian wireless carriers to move away
from offering three-year service contracts and instead offer two-year
contracts. This affects our customer acquisition and retention costs
and subscriber churn. The code was applied to all contracts
renewed after
(excluding enterprise plans) entered into or
December 2, 2013 and applied to contracts (excluding enterprise
plans) as of June 3, 2015, no matter when they were originally
entered. See “Regulation In Our Industry” for more information.

laws,
Our Wireless business could be adversely affected if
regulation, or customer behaviour make it difficult for us to apply
term commitments or early cancellation fees to customers or
receive the service revenue we anticipate from the term
commitments.

RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS
From time to time, media and other reports have highlighted
alleged links between radio frequency emissions from wireless
including cancer, and
devices and various health concerns,
interference with various medical devices, including hearing aids
and pacemakers. This may discourage the use of wireless devices
or expose us to potential
litigation even though there are no
definitive reports or studies stating that these health issues are
directly attributable to radio frequency emissions. Future regulatory
actions may result in more restrictive standards on radio frequency
emissions from low-powered devices like wireless devices. We
cannot predict the nature or extent of any restrictions.

OBTAINING ACCESS TO SUPPORT STRUCTURES AND
MUNICIPAL RIGHTS OF WAY
We must have access to support structures and municipal rights of
way for our cable facilities. We can apply to the CRTC to obtain a
(Canada)
right of access under
(Telecommunications Act) in areas where we cannot secure access
to municipal rights of way. Failure to obtain access could increase
Cable costs and adversely affect our business.

the Telecommunications Act

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 2003, however, that the
CRTC does not have the jurisdiction to establish the terms and
conditions of accessing the poles of hydroelectric companies. As a
result, we normally obtain access under terms established by the
provincial utility boards.

DEPENDENCE ON FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF ILECS
Certain business telephony operations outside of our cable territory
depend significantly on the availability of facilities and services
acquired from incumbent telecommunication operators, according
to CRTC rules. Changes to these rules could significantly affect the
cost of operating these businesses.

COPYRIGHT TARIFFS
Any increase in copyright tariff fees negatively affects our operating
results.

SALES PRACTICES
In 2018, a media report was published based on information from
telecommunication company employees who stated they were
pressured into giving misleading information to customers in an
attempt to get them to sign up for services they did not necessarily
need or want. Reports of overly aggressive sales tactics were
echoed by hundreds of customers who complained to the CRTC
and to the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television
Services (CCTS). In October 2018, the CRTC held a public hearing
as part of a proceeding studying this issue. All of the major
telecommunication companies denied that any problems were
systemic and representative of
the industry. Concurrently, we
performed an internal investigation and determined that only a very
small percentage of our tens of millions of customer interactions
per year result in complaints due to aggressive or misleading sales
practices.

The CRTC released its report to ISED Canada on February 20, 2019
recommending further consideration of:
• mandatory provision of pre-sales quotes to better

inform

customers;

• trial periods to allow customers to cancel a service that did not

match what they were offered;

• creating a services suitability standard to ensure offers and

promotions match the customer’s needs and means; and

• expanding the CCTS’ mandate to include handling complaints
of misleading or aggressive retail sales practices as part of the
planned CCTS review proceeding in 2022.

ISED Canada will now consider the report. The proposed follow-up
proceedings could result in new mandates regarding how we sell
our services.

TALENT ACQUISITION AND RETENTION

A significant transformation is underway in our industry, and as
competition for talent increases, our success is highly dependent
on our ability to attract and retain a high-performing and engaged
workforce, including in key growth areas, such as digital- and IT-
focus must be on providing career and
related fields. Our
development opportunities,
competitive compensation and
benefits, and a great employee experience. Changes to our
workforce as a result of factors such as turnover and restructuring,
failing to develop internal succession, cost reduction initiatives,
ongoing union negotiations, or other events could have an adverse
effect on the customer experience, and as a result our revenue and
profitability.

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE

Creating best-in-class customer experiences is one of our six
strategic priorities. This is because a great customer experience is
loyalty and their
key to our long-term success. Our customers’
likelihood to recommend Rogers are both dependent upon our
ability to provide a service experience that meets or exceeds their
expectations. We handle many customer interactions annually,
ranging from potential new customers making in-store purchases
to existing customers calling for technical support and everything in
between. Additionally, every time someone uses one of our
products, such as making a call on their wireless device, browsing
the Internet or watching their favourite show using their Internet or

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

61

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

television services, or listening to one of our radio stations, their
experience affects all future interactions with the Rogers brand. If
our products do not deliver the usage experience our customers
expect from us, and if we do not have clear, simple, and fair
it could cause confusion and
interactions with our customers,
sales
frustrate our customers, with the potential
opportunities and increased churn, both of which could have
negative effects on our reputation, results of operations, and
financial condition.

lost

for

INFORMATION SECURITY RISK

Our industry is vulnerable to cyber risks that are growing in both
frequency and complexity. Rogers, along with our suppliers,
employs systems and network infrastructure that are subject to
cyberattacks, which may include theft of assets, unauthorized
access to proprietary or sensitive information, destruction or
corruption of data, or operational disruption. A significant
cyberattack against our, or our
suppliers’, critical network
infrastructure and supporting information systems could result in
service disruptions,
significant
remediation costs, and reputational damage.

loss of customers,

litigation,

Management has committed to an information and cybersecurity
program designed to reinforce the importance of remaining a
secure, vigilant, and resilient organization. Our ongoing success
depends on protecting our sensitive data,
including personal
information about our customers and employees. We rely on
security awareness training, policies, procedures, and information
this information. Success also
technology systems to protect
depends on Rogers continuing to monitor these risks, leveraging
external threat intelligence,
internal monitoring, reviewing best
practices, and implementing controls as required to mitigate them.
We have insurance coverage against certain damages related to
cybersecurity breaches,
intrusions, and attacks, amongst other
things. The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing
management’s policies and associated procedures related to
cybersecurity risks.

External threats to the network and our business generally are
constantly changing and there is no assurance we will be able to
protect the network from all future threats. The impact of such
attacks may affect our revenue.

IMPACT OF NETWORK FAILURES ON REVENUE AND
CUSTOMER SERVICE

Customers have high expectations of reliable and consistent
performance of our networks. Failure to maintain high service levels
and managing network traffic could have an impact on the
customer experience, potentially resulting in an increase in
customer churn. Due to the increased demand and traffic on our
there could be capacity and
Internet and wireless networks,
congestion pressures. Such pressures may cause issues with our
networks in terms of speed and connectivity. If our networks or key
network components fail, it could, in some circumstances, result in
a loss of service for our customers for certain periods and have an
adverse effect on our results and our financial position. We also rely
on business partners to carry some traffic for certain customers. If
one of these carriers has a service failure, it might also cause a
service interruption for certain customers that would last until we

62

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

could reroute the traffic to another carrier. This could have an
adverse effect on our ability to service existing customers and
acquire new subscribers.

We work to protect our networks and our service from the impact
of natural disasters and major weather events such as ice storms,
wind storms, forest fires, flooding, earthquakes, or landslides where
it is necessary and feasible to do so. There are no assurances that a
future event will not cause service outages and that such outages
would not affect our results. Service disruptions or outages could
also affect our operations if not quickly resolved, potentially causing
a risk of billing delays or errors.
If we fail to have appropriate
response strategies and protocols in place to handle service
outages in the face of these types of events, they could have an
impact on our revenue and our customer experience. Recovering
resources and
from these disasters could require significant
remediation costs, which are difficult to estimate.

DEPENDENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SYSTEMS

Our businesses depend on IT systems for day-to-day operations. If
we are unable to operate our systems, make enhancements to
accommodate customer growth and new products and services, or
if our systems experience disruptions or failures, it could have an
adverse effect on our ability to acquire new subscribers, service
customers, manage subscriber churn, produce accurate and timely
subscriber
invoices, generate revenue growth, and manage
operating expenses. This could have an adverse impact on our
results and financial position.

Most of our employees and critical elements of our network
infrastructure and IT systems are concentrated in various physical
facilities. If we cannot access one or more of these facilities as a
result of a natural or human-made disaster or otherwise, our
operations may be significantly affected to the extent that it may be
difficult for us to recover without a significant interruption in service
or negative impact to our revenue or customer base.

DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Our network plans assume the availability of new technology for
both wireless and wireline networks. While we work with industry
standards bodies and our vendors to ensure timely delivery of new
technology, there are no assurances these technologies will be
available as and when required.

technologies have affected the way our services are

Several
delivered, including:
• broadband;
• IP-based voice, data, and video delivery services;
• increased use of optical fibre technologies to businesses and

residences;

• broadband wireless access and wireless services using a radio
frequency spectrum to which we may have limited or no access;
and

• applications and services using cloud-based technology,

independent of carrier or physical connectivity.

These technologies may also lead to significantly different cost
structures for users and therefore affect the long-term viability of
some of our current technologies. Some of these technologies

have allowed competitors to enter our markets with similar
products or services at lower costs. These competitors may also be
larger, have greater access to financial resources, and have fewer
regulatory restrictions than Rogers.

Apple has introduced embedded Subscriber Identification Module
(e-SIM) technology to its latest iPhones and iPads. This technology,
when widely adopted, will allow customers to switch between
carriers without the use of a carrier-provided SIM card. If Apple
continues to introduce, or other major device vendors introduce,
e-SIM to their mobile products in Canada, this could have an
adverse effect on our business, churn, and results of operations, as
many customers without subsidized devices are under no
contractual obligation to remain with Rogers.

OTHER BUSINESS RISKS

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Our businesses are affected by general economic conditions and
consumer confidence and spending. Recessions, declines in
economic activity, and economic uncertainty can erode consumer
and business confidence and reduce discretionary spending. Any
these factors can negatively affect us through reduced
of
advertising,
lower demand for our products and services,
decreased revenue and profitability, and higher churn and bad
debt expense. A significant portion of our broadcasting,
publishing, and digital revenue comes from the sale of advertising
and is affected by the strength of the economy.

Accelerated deployments of fibre networks by competitors may
lead to an increase in the reach and stability of their wireline-related
services. This could result in an increase in churn pertaining to our
wireline business
services. See “Key Performance
Indicators” for more information.

segment

STRATEGY AND BUSINESS PLANS
Our strategy is vital to our long-term success. Changing strategic
priorities or adding new strategic priorities could compromise
existing initiatives and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Improvements in the quality of streaming video over the Internet,
coupled with increasing availability of television shows and movies
online through OTT content providers, has resulted in competition
for viewership and increased competition for Canadian cable
television service providers. As a result, we have noticed an increase
in cord cutting and cord shaving as consumers continue to
withdraw from traditional cable services. If advances in technology
are made to any alternative Canadian multi-channel broadcasting
distribution system, our cable services may face increased
competition. In addition, as the technology for wireless Internet
continues to develop, it is, in some instances, replacing traditional
wireline Internet.

The use of PVRs has affected our ability to generate television
advertising revenue as viewers can skip advertising aired on
television networks. The continued emergence and growth of
subscriber-based satellite and digital radio products could affect
AM and FM radio audience listening habits and have a negative
effect on the results of our radio stations. Certain audiences are
also migrating away from traditional broadcast platforms to the
Internet as more video and audio content streaming becomes
available.

RELIANCE ON THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS

We have outsourcing and managed service arrangements with
third parties to provide certain essential components of our
business operations to our employees and customers, including
certain facilities or property management functions, call centre
support, certain installation and service technicians, certain network
and IT functions, and invoice printing. Interruptions in these services
could adversely affect our ability to service our customers. In the
course of
third-party service
providers must ensure our information is appropriately protected
and safeguarded. Failure to do so may affect Rogers through
increased regulatory risk, reputational damage, and damage to the
customer experience.

fulfilling service arrangements,

We develop business plans, execute projects, and launch new
ventures to grow our business. If the expected benefits from these
do not materialize, this could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The development and deployment of our Connected Home
products rely, in part, on certain vendors. Should the deployment
not proceed as planned, or should the product not operate as
intended, our business and financial results could be adversely
affected. This may result in subscriber losses, lower Cable revenue,
and unfavourable customer satisfaction.

This program must

MONITORING AND CONTROLLING FRAUDULENT
ACTIVITIES
As a large company with tens of thousands of employees and a
range of desirable and valuable products and services,
fraud
prevention requires a disciplined program covering governance,
exposure identification and assessment, prevention, detection,
and reporting.
corruption,
misappropriation of assets, and intentional manipulation of
financial statements by employees and/or external parties. Fraud
events can result
In
addition to unauthorized access to digital boxes and Internet
modems (as discussed above), a sample of potential examples of
fraud relevant to us include (i) network usage fraud, such as call/sell
operations using our cable or wireless networks, (ii) subscription
fraud on accounts established with a false identity or paid with a
stolen credit card, and (iii) copyright theft and other forms of
unauthorized use that undermine the exclusivity of our content
offerings.

loss and brand degradation.

in financial

consider

UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO DIGITAL BOXES OR INTERNET
MODEMS
We use encryption technology developed and supported by our
vendors to protect our cable signals from unauthorized access and
to programming based on subscription
to control access
packages. We also use encryption and security technologies to
prevent unauthorized access to our Internet service.

There is no assurance that we will be able to effectively prevent
unauthorized decoding of television signals or Internet access in

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

63

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

If we are unable to control cable access with our
the future.
encryption technology, and subscriptions to digital programming,
including premium video-on-demand and subscription video-on-
demand, this could result in a decline in our Cable revenue.

LEGAL AND ETHICAL COMPLIANCE
We rely on our employees, officers, Board, suppliers, and other
business partners to behave consistently with applicable legal and
ethical standards in all jurisdictions in which we operate, including,
but not limited to, anti-bribery laws and regulations. Situations
where individuals or others, whether inadvertently or intentionally,
do not adhere to our policies, applicable laws and regulations, or
contractual obligations may expose us to litigation and the
possibility of damages, sanctions, and fines, or of being disqualified
from bidding on contracts. This may have an adverse effect on our
results, financial position, reputation, and brand.

DEPENDENCE ON CERTAIN KEY INFRASTRUCTURE AND
WIRELESS DEVICE VENDORS
Our wireless business has relationships with a relatively small
number of essential network infrastructure and device vendors. We
do not have operational or financial control over them and only
have limited influence on how they conduct their business with us.
Wireless device vendor market share has recently shifted towards
fewer top suppliers, which will augment this dependency.

If one of our network infrastructure suppliers fails, it could delay
adding network capacity or new capabilities and services. Device
and network infrastructure suppliers can extend delivery times, raise
prices, and limit supply due to their own shortages and business
requirements, among other things.
these suppliers do not
develop devices that satisfy customer demands, nor deliver
products and services on a timely basis, it could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations. Any interruption in the supply of equipment for our
networks could also affect the quality of our service or impede
network development and expansion.

If

REVENUE EXPECTATIONS FROM NEW AND
ADVANCED SERVICES
We expect that a substantial portion of our future revenue growth
may come from new and advanced services, and we continue to
invest significant capital resources to develop our networks so we
can offer these services. It is possible, however, that there may not
be sufficient consumer demand, or that we may not anticipate or
satisfy demand for certain products and services or be able to offer
these new products and services successfully to
or market
subscribers. If we do not attract subscribers to new products and
services profitably or keep pace with changing consumer
preferences, we could experience slower revenue growth and
increased churn. This could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition.

COMPLEXITY OF OUR BUSINESS
Our businesses,
technologies, processes, and systems are
operationally complex and increasingly interconnected. If we do
not execute properly, or if errors or disasters affect them, customers
may have a negative experience, resulting in increased churn and
lower revenue.

64

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

interconnected
Additionally, we have a large number of
operational and business
systems, with continually
support
increasing complexity. Development and launch of new services
may require significant system development and integration efforts.
There are no assurances that any proposed IT system or process
change initiatives will be implemented successfully or within
required timelines, failure of which could have an adverse effect on
our results and financial position.

and

businesses

complementary

ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES, OR INVESTMENTS
Acquiring
technologies,
developing strategic alliances, and divesting portions of our
business are often required to optimally execute our business
strategy. Some areas of our operations (and adjacent businesses)
are subject to rapidly evolving technologies and consumer usage
and demand trends.
It is possible that we may not effectively
forecast the value of consumer demand or risk of competing
technologies resulting in higher valuations for acquisitions or
missed opportunities.

Services, technologies, key personnel, or businesses of companies
we acquire may not be effectively integrated into our business or
service offerings, or our alliances may not be successful. We also
may not be able to successfully complete certain divestitures on
satisfactory terms, if at all.

INCREASE IN BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE (BYOD)
CUSTOMERS
With the CRTC’s Wireless Code limiting wireless term contracts to
two years from three years, the number of BYOD customers with
no-term contracts has increased. These customers are under no
contractual obligation to remain with Rogers, which could have a
material adverse effect on our churn and our Wireless revenue.

linear

ACCESS TO PROGRAMMING RIGHTS
Competition is increasing for content programming rights from
both traditional
television broadcasters and online
competitors. Online providers are moving towards self-made, self-
hosted exclusive content, such that traditional broadcasters may
not gain access to desirable programming. Additionally,
if
broadcasters and distributors sign longer-term agreements to
secure programming rights, this could affect the availability of
desirable programming rights and result in lower revenue due to a
lack of access to these rights.

INCREASING PROGRAMMING COSTS
Acquiring programming is the single most significant purchasing
commitment in our Cable television business and is a material cost
for Media television properties.
Increased competition for
programming rights to content and popular properties from both
linear television broadcasters and online competitors
traditional
continue to increase the cost of programming rights. Higher
programming costs could adversely affect the operating results of
our business if we are unable to recover programming investments
through advertising revenue and subscription fee increases that
reflect the market.

DECLINE OF PAY TELEVISION SUBSCRIBERS IN CANADA
The number of pay television households in Canada has declined.
Other video offerings available to consumers (for example,

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

direct-to-consumer subscription and free services), as well as piracy,
have contributed to this trend. If this decline continues, it could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

dividends, which reduces funds available for other business
purposes, including other financial operations;

• making us more vulnerable to adverse economic and industry

focus

towards

the digital market.

MIGRATING FROM CONVENTIONAL TO DIGITAL MEDIA
Our Media business operates in many industries that can be
affected by customers migrating from conventional
to digital
media, which is driving shifts in the quality and accessibility of data
and mobile alternatives to conventional media. We have been
shifting our
Increasing
competition for advertising revenue from digital platforms, such as
search engines, social networks, and digital content alternatives,
has resulted in advertising dollars migrating from conventional
television broadcasters to digital platforms. The impact is greater
on conventional over-the-air broadcast networks, such as City and
OMNI, which do not have a second revenue stream from
subscription revenue. Our Media results could be adversely
affected if we are unsuccessful in shifting advertising dollars from
conventional to digital platforms.

OUR MARKET POSITION IN RADIO, TELEVISION, OR
MAGAZINE READERSHIP
Advertising dollars typically migrate to media properties that are
leaders in their respective markets and categories, particularly when
advertising budgets are tight. Our radio, television, and magazine
properties may not continue performing how they currently
perform. Advertisers base a substantial part of their purchasing
decisions on ratings and readership data generated by industry
associations and agencies. If our radio and television ratings or
magazine readership levels decrease substantially, our advertising
sales volumes and the rates that we charge advertisers could be
adversely affected.

CLIMATE CHANGE
Climate change is an increasingly important consideration in all
businesses, including the telecommunications business. Failure of
climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts could affect our
business through potential disruption of our operations, damage
to our infrastructure, and the effects on the communities we serve.

Climate change and the environment are drawing more attention
through evolving public interest. Many aspects of our operations
are subject to evolving and increasingly stringent federal, provincial,
and local environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations.
Such laws and regulations impose requirements with respect to
matters such as the release of substances into the environment,
corrective and remedial action concerning such releases, and the
proper handling and management of substances. These evolving
considerations and more stringent laws and regulations could lead
to increased costs for compliance and rising costs of utilities. Failure
to recognize and adequately respond could result
in fines,
regulatory scrutiny, or damage to our reputation or brand.

FINANCIAL RISKS

CAPITAL COMMITMENTS, LIQUIDITY, DEBT, AND INTEREST
PAYMENTS
Our capital commitments and financing obligations could have
important consequences including:
• requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash provided
by operating activities to pay interest, principal amounts, and

conditions;

• limiting our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in

our business and industry;

• putting us at a competitive disadvantage compared to
competitors who may have more financial resources and/or less
financial leverage; or

• restricting our ability to obtain additional

financing to fund
working capital and capital expenditures and for other general
corporate purposes.

Our ability to satisfy our financial obligations depends on our future
operating performance and economic, financial, competitive, and
other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business
may not generate sufficient cash flow in the future and financings
may not be available to provide sufficient net proceeds to meet
these obligations or to successfully execute our business strategy.

CREDIT RATINGS
Credit ratings provide an independent measure of credit quality of
a securities issuer and can affect our ability to obtain short- and
If rating
long-term financing and the terms of the financing.
agencies lower the credit ratings on our debt, particularly a
downgrade below investment-grade, it could adversely affect our
cost of financing and access to liquidity and capital.

CAPITAL MARKETS
External capital market conditions could affect our ability to make
strategic
funding
investments and meet ongoing capital
requirements. Risk factors include a reduction in lending activity,
disruptions in capital markets, and regulatory requirements for an
increase in bank capitalization, which could either reduce the
availability, or increase the cost, of capital.

INCOME TAXES AND OTHER TAXES
We collect, pay, and accrue significant amounts of income and
other taxes, such as federal and provincial sales, employment, and
property taxes.

We have recorded significant amounts of deferred and current
income tax liabilities and expense, and calculated these amounts
based on substantively enacted income tax rates in effect at the
relevant time. A legislative change in these rates could have a
material effect on the amounts recorded and payable in the future.

We provide for income and other taxes based on all currently
available information and believe that we have adequately
provided for these items. The calculation of applicable taxes in
many cases, however, requires significant judgment in interpreting
tax rules and regulations. Our tax filings are subject to audits, which
could materially change the amount of current and deferred
income tax assets, liabilities, and expense, and could, in certain
circumstances, result in the assessment of interest and penalties.

While we believe we have paid and provided for adequate amounts
of tax, our business is complex and significant judgment is required
in interpreting how tax legislation and regulations apply to us.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

65

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

INVENTORY OBSOLESCENCE
Our inventories balance mainly consists of wireless devices and
mobile data devices, which generally have relatively short product
lifecycles due to frequent new device introductions. If we cannot
effectively manage inventory levels based on product demand, this
may increase the risk of inventory obsolescence.

HIGHER DEVICE SUBSIDIES
Our wireless business model is based substantially on subsidizing
the cost of subscriber devices, similar to other Canadian wireless
carriers. This model attracts customers and in exchange, they
commit to a term contract with us. We also commit to a minimum
subsidy per unit with the supplier of certain smartphone devices. If
we are unable to recover the costs of the subsidies over the term of
the customer contract, this could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition.

LITIGATION RISKS

SYSTEM ACCESS FEE – SASKATCHEWAN
In 2004, a class action was commenced against providers of wireless
communications
the Class Actions Act
(Saskatchewan). The class action relates to the system access fee
wireless carriers charge to some of their customers. The plaintiffs are
seeking unspecified damages and punitive damages, which would
effectively be a reimbursement of all system access fees collected.

in Canada under

In 2007, the Saskatchewan Court granted the plaintiffs’ application
to have the proceeding certified as a national, “opt-in” class action
where affected customers outside Saskatchewan must take specific
steps to participate in the proceeding. In 2008, our motion to stay
the proceeding based on the arbitration clause in our wireless
service agreements was granted. The Saskatchewan Court directed
that its order, in respect of the certification of the action, would
exclude customers who are bound by an arbitration clause from
the class of plaintiffs.

In 2009, counsel for the plaintiffs began a second proceeding
under the Class Actions Act (Saskatchewan) asserting the same
claims as the original proceeding. If successful, this second class
action would be an “opt-out” class proceeding. This second
proceeding was ordered conditionally stayed in 2009 on the basis
that it was an abuse of process.

At the time the Saskatchewan class action was commenced in
2004, corresponding claims were filed in multiple jurisdictions
across Canada, although the plaintiffs took no active steps. The
appeal courts in several provinces dismissed the corresponding
claims as an abuse of process. The claims in all provinces other than
Saskatchewan have now been dismissed or discontinued. We have
not recognized a liability for this contingency.

911 FEE
In June 2008, a class action was launched in Saskatchewan against
providers of wireless communications services in Canada. It involves
allegations of breach of contract, misrepresentation, and false
advertising, among other things, in relation to the 911 fee that had
been charged by us and the other wireless telecommunication
providers in Canada. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified
damages and restitution. The plaintiffs intend to seek an order

66

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

certifying the proceeding as a national
Saskatchewan. We have not
contingency.

recognized a liability for

class action in
this

of wireless

communications

CELLULAR DEVICES
In July 2013, a class action was launched in British Columbia against
providers
and
manufacturers of wireless devices. The class action relates to the
alleged adverse health effects incurred by long-term users of
cellular devices. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages
and punitive damages, effectively equal to the reimbursement of
the portion of revenue the defendants have received that can
reasonably be attributed to the sale of cellular phones in Canada.
We have not recognized a liability for this contingency.

in Canada

OTHER CLAIMS
There are certain other claims and potential claims against us. We
do not expect any of these, individually or in the aggregate, to have
a material adverse effect on our financial results.

is subject

OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS
The outcome of all
the proceedings and claims against us,
including the matters described above,
to future
It is not
resolution that includes the uncertainties of litigation.
possible for us to predict the result or magnitude of the claims due
to the various factors and uncertainties involved in the legal
process. Based on information currently known to us, we believe it
these
is not probable that
proceedings and claims, individually or in total, will have a material
adverse effect on our business,
financial
condition. If it becomes probable that we will be held liable for
claims against us, we will recognize a provision during the period in
which the change in probability occurs, which could be material to
our Consolidated Statements of
Income or Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position.

the ultimate resolution of any of

results, or

financial

OWNERSHIP RISK

CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
family-controlled company. Voting
Rogers is a family-founded,
control of Rogers Communications Inc.
is held by the Rogers
Control Trust (the Trust) for the benefit of successive generations of
the Rogers family. The beneficiaries of the Trust are a small group
of individuals who are members of the Rogers family, several of
whom are also directors of the Board. The trustee is the trust
company subsidiary of a Canadian chartered bank.

As at December 31, 2018, private, Rogers family holding
companies controlled by the Trust owned approximately 92% of
our outstanding Class A Shares (2017 – 91%) and approximately
10% of our Class B Non-Voting Shares (2017 – 10%), or in total
approximately 27% of the total shares outstanding (2017 – 27%).
Only Class A Shares carry the right to vote in most circumstances.
As a result, the Trust is able to elect all members of the Board and
to control the vote on most matters submitted to a shareholder
vote.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as at
the supervision and with the
December 31, 2018, under
participation of our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant
to Rule 13a-15
promulgated under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at that date.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management
adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

is responsible for establishing and maintaining

Our internal control system is designed to give management and
the Board reasonable assurance that our financial statements are
prepared and fairly presented in accordance with IFRS as issued by
the IASB. The system is intended to provide reasonable assurance
that
transactions are authorized, assets are safeguarded, and
financial records are reliable. Management also takes steps to
assure the flow of information and communication is effective, and
monitors performance and our internal control procedures.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as at December 31, 2018, based on the criteria
set out in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and concluded that it was effective at that
date. Our independent auditors, KPMG LLP, have issued an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. This

report is included in our 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements filed on SEDAR (sedar.com).

All internal control systems, however, no matter how well designed,
have inherent
limitations, and even systems that have been
determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance
about the preparation and presentation of financial statements.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
On January 1, 2018, we adopted IFRS 15 and implemented a new
revenue recognition accounting system enabling us to comply with
IFRS 15 requirements. As a result, we have made significant
additions and modifications to our internal controls over financial
reporting. Notably, we have:
• updated our policies and procedures related to how we

recognize revenue;

• augmented our risk assessment process to take into account the

risks related to recognizing revenue under IFRS 15;

• implemented controls surrounding our new revenue recognition
system to ensure the inputs, processes, and outputs are
accurate; and

• implemented controls designed to address risks associated with

the five-step revenue recognition model.

In July 2018, we implemented a new human resources
management and payroll system. The implementation of the new
system has resulted in enhancements and other changes to
controls and procedures pertaining to employee salaries and
benefits.

Other than the items described above,
there have been no
changes in 2018 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

67

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Regulation In Our Industry
Our business, except
Media, is regulated by two groups:
• ISED Canada on behalf of the Minister of Innovation, Science

for the non-broadcasting operations of

and Economic Development; and

• the CRTC, under

the Telecommunications Act and the

Broadcasting Act (Canada) (Broadcasting Act).

Regulation relates to the following, among other things:
• wireless spectrum and broadcasting licensing;
• competition;
• the cable television programming services we must, and can,

distribute;

• wireless and wireline interconnection agreements;
• rates we can charge third parties for access to our network;
• the resale of services on our networks;
• roaming on our networks and the networks of others;
• ownership and operation of our communications systems; and
• our ability to acquire an interest

in other communications

systems.

Regulatory changes or decisions can adversely affect our
consolidated results of operations.

Our costs of providing services may increase from time to time as
legislative initiatives to address
we comply with industry or
consumer protection concerns or
Internet-related issues like
copyright infringement, unsolicited commercial e-mail, cybercrime,
and lawful access.

Generally, our spectrum and broadcast licences are granted for a
specified term and are subject to conditions for maintaining these
licences. Regulators can modify these licensing conditions at any
time, and they can decide not to renew a licence when it expires. If
we do not comply with the conditions, a licence may be forfeited or
revoked, or we may be fined.

The licences have conditions that require us, amongst other things,
to comply with Canadian ownership restrictions of the applicable
legislation. We are currently in compliance with these conditions. If
we violate the requirements, we would be subject to various
penalties, including the loss of a licence in extreme cases.

Cable, wireless, and broadcasting licences generally cannot be
transferred without regulatory approval.

CANADIAN BROADCASTING AND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS
The CRTC is responsible for regulating and supervising all aspects
of the Canadian broadcasting and telecommunications system.
Our Canadian broadcasting operations – including our cable
television systems, radio and television stations, and specialty
services—are licensed (or operated under an exemption order) and
regulated by the CRTC under the Broadcasting Act.

The CRTC is also responsible under the Telecommunications Act
for the regulation of telecommunications carriers, including:
• Wireless’ mobile voice and data operations; and
• Cable’s Internet and telephone services.

Our cable and telecommunications retail services are not subject to
price regulation, other than our affordable entry-level basic cable

68

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

television service ordered by the CRTC and introduced in 2016, as
the CRTC believes there is enough competition for these services
provided by other carriers to protect the interests of users and has
forborne from regulating them. Regulations can and do, however,
affect
the terms and conditions under which we offer these
services.

SPECTRUM LICENCES
ISED Canada sets technical standards for telecommunications
(Canada)
under
Radiocommunication
(Radiocommunication Act) and the Telecommunications Act.
It
licences and oversees:
• the technical aspects of the operation of radio and television

Act

the

stations;

• the frequency-related operations of cable television networks;

and

• spectrum for wireless communications systems in Canada.

ROYALTIES
The Copyright Board of Canada (Copyright Board) oversees the
administration of copyright royalties in Canada and establishes the
royalties to be paid for the use of certain copyrighted works. It sets
that Canadian broadcasting
the copyright
undertakings,
television, and specialty
services, pay to copyright collectives.

royalties
including cable,

radio,

tariff

BILLING AND CONTRACTS
Manitoba, Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario, and Quebec
have enacted consumer protection legislation for wireless, wireline,
and Internet service contracts. This legislation addresses the
content of such contracts,
the early
cancellation fees that can be charged to customers, the use of
security deposits, the cancellation and renewal rights of customers,
the sale of prepaid cards, and the disclosure of related costs.
Rogers is also currently subject to the CRTC Wireless Code and the
CRTC Television Service Provider Code of Conduct that became
effective on September 1, 2017. See “CRTC Wireless Code” for
more information.

the determination of

FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL
Non-Canadians can own and control, directly or indirectly:
• up to 33.3% of the voting shares and the related votes of a
holding company that has a subsidiary operating company
licenced under the Broadcasting Act, and

• up to 20% of the voting shares and the related votes of the
operating licensee company may be owned and controlled
directly or indirectly by non-Canadians.

Combined, these limits can enable effective foreign control of up
to 46.7%.

The chief executive officer and 80% of the members of the Board of
Directors of the operating licensee must be resident Canadians.
There are no restrictions on the number of non-voting shares that
may be held by non-Canadians at either the holding company or
the licensee company level. Neither the Canadian carrier nor its
parent may be otherwise controlled in fact by non-Canadians.
Subject to appeal to the federal Cabinet, the CRTC has the
jurisdiction to determine as a question of fact whether a given
licensee is controlled by non-Canadians.

the

same

to the Telecommunications Act and associated
Pursuant
regulations,
to Canadian
also
telecommunications carriers such as Wireless, except that there is
no requirement that the chief executive officer be a resident
Canadian. We believe we are in compliance with the foregoing
foreign ownership and control requirements.

apply

rules

less

On June 29, 2012, Bill C-38 amending the Telecommunications Act
passed into law. The amendments exempt telecommunications
companies with
total Canadian
telecommunications market measured by revenue from foreign
investment restrictions. Companies that are successful in growing
their market
total Canadian
telecommunications market revenue other than by way of merger
or acquisitions will continue to be exempt from the restrictions.

in excess of 10% of

10% of

shares

than

an

extensive

proceeding

CRTC REVIEW OF BASIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
After
which
telecommunications services Canadians require to participate
meaningfully in the digital economy and the CRTC’s role in
ensuring the availability of affordable basic telecommunications
services to all Canadians, the CRTC released Telecom Regulatory
Policy CRTC 2016-496, Modern telecommunications services – The
path forward for Canada’s digital economy, on December 21, 2016.

examining

The CRTC set as its universal service objective that Canadians, in
urban areas as well as in rural and remote areas, have access to
voice services and broadband Internet access services, on both
fixed and mobile wireless networks. To measure the successful
achievement of this objective, the CRTC has established several
criteria, including:
• 90% of Canadian residential and business fixed broadband
Internet access service subscribers should be able to access
speeds of at least 50 Mbps download and 10 Mbps upload, and
to subscribe to a service offering with an unlimited data
allowance by 2021, with the remaining 10% of the population
receiving such service by 2031; and

• the latest generally deployed mobile wireless technology should
be available not only in Canadian homes and businesses, but on
as many major transportation roads as possible in Canada.

To help attain the universal service objective, the CRTC will begin to
shift the focus of its regulatory frameworks from wireline voice
services to broadband Internet access services. As such,
the
following services which form part of the universal service objective
are hereby basic telecommunications services within the meaning
of subsection 46.5(1) of the Telecommunications Act:
• fixed and mobile wireless broadband Internet access services;

and

• fixed and mobile wireless voice services.

To assist in extending broadband into under-served rural and
remote locations, the CRTC stated that it would establish a new
broadband funding mechanism. The specifics of
the fund,
including guiding principles, fund design, and assessment criteria,
were addressed in a follow-up proceeding during 2017. The
Decision on these items was released in Telecom Regulatory Policy
CRTC 2018-377, Development of the Commission’s Broadband
Fund, on September 27, 2018. A call for applications will occur in
2019 with a maximum funding level of $100 million in the first year
of implementation. This level will increase by $25 million annually
the following four years to reach an annual cap of
over

$200 million, with the incremental increases in years four and five
contingent on a review of the fund in the third year to ensure it is
being managed efficiently and is achieving its intended purpose.
Funds will be generated by extending a percent of revenue levy
currently applied on wireline and wireless voice revenues to include
Internet and texting revenue. The CRTC noted that the revenue
percent charge at the $200 million annual cap in year five would be
approximately the same as the current revenue percent charge.

local

voice serving areas

Designated high-cost
received
approximately $115 million in subsidies in 2017 collected by a
0.60% levy on wireline and wireless voice services revenue. In its
original 2016 decision, the CRTC determined that the current local
voice subsidy will be phased out, except where reliable broadband
Internet access service is unavailable, and a follow-up proceeding
would occur in 2017 to establish the specifics of the phase-out of
the subsidy.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

After the 2017 follow-up proceeding, on June 26, 2018, in Telecom
Regulatory Policy CRTC 2018-213, Phase-out of the local voice
service subsidy regime, the CRTC determined that the current
$115 million local service subsidy for incumbent local telephone
company high-cost serving areas would be phased out in six equal
increments between 2019 and 2021 such that the voice subsidy will
be eliminated by the end of 2021.

CANADA’S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION
Canada’s anti-spam legislation was passed into law on
December 15, 2010 and came into force on July 1, 2014. Sections
of such legislation related to the unsolicited installation of
computer programs or software came into force on January 15,
2015. A private right of action that was to come into place under
the legislation effective July 1, 2017 was deferred. We believe we
are in compliance with this legislation.

MANDATORY NOTIFICATION OF PRIVACY BREACHES
On June 18, 2015, Bill S-4 – the Digital Privacy Act was passed into
law, and made a number of amendments to the Personal
Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. The
amendment that introduced mandatory breach notification rules
came into force on November 1, 2018. Businesses must now notify
impacted individuals and the federal Privacy Commissioner of a
privacy breach where it is reasonable to believe the breach creates
a real risk of significant harm to the individual. Notification must be
completed as soon as feasible after it is determined a breach
occurred. Businesses must also keep records of breaches and
provide these records to the Privacy Commissioner upon request.
The Privacy Commissioner may also launch an investigation or audit
based on the information contained in the breach report. Failure to
provide notification or maintain records could result in fines up to
$100,000 per violation.

GOVERNMENT OF CANADA LAUNCHES REVIEW OF
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND BROADCASTING ACTS
On June 5, 2018,
ISED Canada Minister Bains and Canadian
the
Heritage Minister
Joly announced a joint
Telecommunications Act (Canada) and Broadcasting Act (Canada).
A seven-person expert panel will conduct the review. The review will
attempt
to modernize the legislative framework with specific
instruction that the exercise be guided by the principles of net

review of

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

69

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

It will examine support mechanisms for creation,
neutrality.
production, and distribution of Canadian content, with an
emphasis on exploring how all players (including over-the-top
services) can contribute. The review will also seek to address how to
best promote competition and affordability for Internet and mobile
wireless services. Rogers and others filed their written submissions
with the panel on January 11, 2019. An interim report is anticipated
in June 2019 with final recommendations due by January 31, 2020.

WIRELESS

600 MHZ SPECTRUM LICENCE BAND
On August 14, 2015, ISED Canada released a decision regarding
the reallocation of spectrum licences in the 600 MHz band for
reallocate the same amount of
mobile services. Canada will
spectrum licences as the US, following the US 600 MHz incentive
auction that concluded in 2017. TV channels currently using the
600 MHz band spectrum that will be auctioned for mobile services
will be given a new channel in the new allotment plan and will be
provided with a minimum of 18 months to complete the transition.
Certain Rogers over-the-air TV channels will need to be
transitioned.

On March 28, 2018, ISED Canada released its Technical, Policy and
Licensing Framework for Spectrum in the 600 MHz Band,
establishing the rules and timelines for the 600 MHz spectrum
licence auction. The framework set aside 30 MHz (of the available
70 MHz) for carriers other than the three national carriers, Rogers,
Bell, and Telus. The auction will commence on March 12, 2019.

3500 MHZ SPECTRUM LICENCE BAND
In December 2014, ISED Canada released its policy changes to the
3500 MHz spectrum band. Rogers has a 50% interest in the
Inukshuk Wireless Partnership which holds between 100-175 MHz
of 3500 MHz spectrum in most major urban markets in Canada.
The 3500 MHz band will be reallocated for mobile services (it is
currently only licensed for fixed wireless access in Canada). The
band will eventually be relicensed on a flexible-use basis whereby
licensees will be permitted to determine the extent to which they
will implement fixed and/or mobile services in the band in a given
geographic area.

ISED Canada released its Consultation on
On June 6, 2018,
Revisions to the 3500 MHz Band to Accommodate Flexible Use
and Preliminary Consultation on Changes to the 3800 MHz Band.
The 3500 MHz band is viewed as key spectrum to support 5G
ISED Canada
In its consultation documents,
technologies.
proposed two options for claw back of existing spectrum licences:

Option 1 – For each licence area, existing licensees would be
issued flexible-use licences for one-third of their current spectrum
holdings rounded to the nearest 10 MHz, with a minimum of 20
MHz.

Option 2 – For each licence area, existing licensees would be
issued flexible-use licences for a fixed amount of spectrum. Any
licensee that holds 50 MHz of spectrum or more would be licensed
for 50 MHz; all other licensees would be licensed for 20 MHz.

Rogers and others filed their comments on the consultation
document on July 12, 2018. Reply comments were filed on
August 10, 2018. A decision is anticipated in the first quarter of

2019. In its Spectrum Outlook 2018 to 2022, also released on
June 6, 2018, ISED Canada anticipates that 3500 MHz spectrum
will be released for flexible use in late 2020 following an auction in
2020.

WHOLESALE DOMESTIC WIRELESS ROAMING RATES
TERMS & CONDITIONS AND RATES
On May 5, 2015, the CRTC released Telecom Regulatory Policy
2015-177, Regulatory framework for wholesale mobile wireless
services. The CRTC determined it is necessary to regulate the rates
that Rogers and two of its competitors (Bell and Telus) charge other
Canadian wireless carriers for domestic GSM-based wholesale
roaming. The CRTC directed Rogers, Bell, and Telus to each file
proposed cost-based tariffs for wholesale roaming on November 4,
2015. Pending its final determination on the proposed tariffs, the
CRTC approved, on an interim basis, a maximum rate for each of
GSM-based voice, text, and data wholesale roaming provided by
Bell, Rogers, and Telus across their respective networks to other
Canadian wireless carriers. These rates were replaced when the
CRTC gave interim approval to the proposed cost-based tariffs filed
by the carriers on December 3, 2015 and made these interim rates
effective November 23, 2015. The CRTC process to establish final
rates extended into 2018.

The CRTC further determined that it is not appropriate to mandate
wholesale MVNO access.

the CRTC determined that

Finally,
the regulatory measures
established in the decision would remain in place for a minimum of
five years, during which time the CRTC will monitor competitive
conditions in the mobile wireless market.

On March 22, 2018, the CRTC released Telecom Order 2018-99,
Wholesale mobile wireless roaming service tariffs—Final
rates,
establishing the final wholesale tariffs that Rogers, Bell, and Telus
may charge any of the non-national carriers for roaming. The final
rates were made retroactive to May 5, 2015. This decision does not
have a material impact on our financial results.

On July 20, 2017, prompted by Order in Council P.C. 2017-0557,
the CRTC initiated a proceeding (Telecom Notice of Consultation
CRTC 2017-259, Reconsideration of Telecom Decision 2017-56
regarding final terms and conditions for wholesale mobile wireless
roaming service) to reconsider its earlier decision maintaining the
integrity of domestic roaming agreements and instead consider
expanding the scope of the wholesale roaming regime to explore
innovative business models and technological solutions that could
result
in more meaningful choices for Canadian consumers,
especially those with low incomes. The specific issue was to
reconsider
the exclusion of public Wi-Fi networks from the
definition of ‘home network’ that disqualifies such networks from
roaming rights. The proceeding was to consider whether the
impact on investment could be mitigated by imposing conditions,
such as ensuring that roaming by customers of providers who offer
service primarily over Wi-Fi would be incidental
than
permanent by, for example, limiting roaming in amount, subjecting
roaming services to a different tariffed wholesale rate, or both.

rather

On March 22, 2018, the CRTC released Telecom Decision 2018-97,
Reconsideration of Telecom Decision 2017-56 regarding final terms
and conditions for wholesale mobile wireless roaming service. The
CRTC maintained its policy of facilities-based competition, while
confirming its original decision in Telecom Decision 2017-56,

70

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Wholesale mobile wireless roaming service tariffs – Final terms and
conditions, to exclude public Wi-Fi networks from the definition of
‘home network’ and not mandate wholesale access to wireless
networks. The CRTC also announced that the five-year review of the
wireless wholesale regime established in Telecom Regulatory
Policy 2015-177, Regulatory framework for wholesale mobile
wireless services, would start by March 2019. The CRTC further
initiated a new public proceeding (Telecom Notice of Consultation
2018-98, Lower-cost data-only plans for mobile wireless services),
requiring Rogers, Bell, and Telus to file proposed lower-cost data-
only plans by April 23, 2018. Rogers, Bell, and Telus subsequently
filed amended proposals on September 10, 2018.

On December 17, 2018, in Telecom Decision CRTC 2018-475,
Lower-cost data-only plans for mobile wireless services, the CRTC
approved the plans proposed by Rogers, Bell, and Telus, stating
that the introduction of these lower-cost data-only plans will assist
in addressing a previously identified gap in the market by bringing
a variety of new plans to the market within 90 days that were not
previously available, with a mix of prices and data capacities, on
both a prepaid and postpaid basis, and on both the 3G and LTE
networks.

reviews

spectrum licence transfers,

TRANSFERS, DIVISIONS, AND SUBORDINATE LICENSING
OF SPECTRUM LICENCES
In June 2013,
ISED Canada released Framework Relating to
Transfers, Divisions and Subordinate Licensing of Spectrum
Licences for Commercial Mobile Spectrum. The Framework lays
out the criteria ISED Canada will consider and the processes it will
use when it
including
prospective transfers that could arise from purchase or sale options
and other agreements. Key items to note are that:
• ISED Canada will review all spectrum transfer requests, and will
not allow any that result in “undue spectrum concentration” and
reduced competition. Decisions will be made on a case-by-case
basis and will be issued publicly to increase transparency; and
• licensees must ask for a review within 15 days of entering into
any agreement that could lead to a prospective transfer. ISED
Canada will review the agreement as though the licence transfer
that could arise from it has been made.

CRTC WIRELESS CODE
In June 2013, the CRTC issued its Wireless Code. The Wireless
Code imposes several obligations on wireless carriers, including
maximum contract term length, roaming bill caps, device unlocking
requirements, and contract summaries. It also lays out the rules for
device subsidies and early cancellation fees. Under the code, if a
customer cancels a contract early, carriers can only charge the
outstanding balance of the device subsidy they received, which
decreases by an equal amount every month over no more than
24 months. This effectively makes the maximum contract length
two years.

On June 15, 2017, the CRTC released its decision on the three-year
review of the CRTC Wireless Code of Conduct that came into effect
in December 2013 (Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2017-200,
Review of the Wireless Code). The CRTC determined that as of
December 1, 2017, all individual and small business wireless service
customers will have the right to have their cellular phones and other
mobile devices unlocked, free of charge, upon request. In addition,

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

all newly purchased devices must be provided unlocked from that
day forward. The CRTC also determined that for family or shared
plans (multi-line plans), the account holder must, by default, be the
one who consents to data overage and data roaming charges
beyond the established caps ($50 and $100 per month,
respectively). Wireless service providers may, however, allow
account holders to authorize other users on a family or shared plan
to consent to additional charges. The CRTC also made clear that in
all instances, the caps apply on a per account basis, regardless of
the number of devices, for multi-line plans and individual lines on
the account.

TOWER SHARING POLICY
In March 2013,
ISED Canada released Revised Frameworks for
Mandatory Roaming and Antenna Tower and Site Sharing,
concluding a consultation initiated in 2012. It sets out the current
rules for tower and site sharing, among other things. The key terms
of the tower and site sharing rules are:
• all holders of

and
broadcasting certificates must share towers and antenna sites,
where technically feasible, at commercial rates; and

spectrum licences,

radio licences,

• the timeframe for negotiating agreements is 60 days, after which
arbitration according to ISED Canada arbitration rules will begin.

In Telecom Regulatory Policy 2015-177, Regulatory framework for
wholesale mobile wireless services, released in May 2015, the CRTC
determined that
require general
it would not mandate or
wholesale tariffs for tower and site sharing. At the same time, it
determined that its existing powers and processes are sufficient to
address tower and site sharing disputes related to rates, terms, and
conditions. As a result, carriers may use the arbitration process
established by ISED Canada, or they may request the CRTC to
intervene in the event that tower and site sharing negotiations fail.

PROPOSED POLICY DIRECTION TO THE CRTC ON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
On February 26, 2019, the Minister of Innovation, Science and
Economic Development Canada tabled a Proposed Order Issuing
a Direction to the CRTC on Implementing the Canadian
Telecommunications Policy Objectives to Promote Competition,
Affordability, Consumer Interests and Innovation. The Direction
signals the government’s intention to require the CRTC to consider
competition, affordability, consumer interests, and innovation in its
telecommunications decisions and to demonstrate to Canadians in
those decisions that it has done so.

CRTC REVIEW OF MOBILE WIRELESS SERVICES
On February 28, 2019, through Telecom Notice of Consultation
CRTC 2019-57, Review of mobile wireless services, the CRTC
initiated its five-year review to examine the state of the mobile
wireless market and to determine whether further action is required
to improve choice and affordability for Canadians. The CRTC is also
seeking comments on its preliminary view that mobile virtual
network operators should have mandated access to the networks
of the national wireless providers (Rogers, Bell, and Telus) until they
are able to establish themselves in the market. Finally, the CRTC will
be looking ahead to the future of mobile wireless services in
Canada, and,
in particular, at whether regulatory measures are
needed to facilitate the deployment of 5G network infrastructure,
such as small-cell sites.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

71

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

CABLE

DIFFERENTIAL PRICING RELATED TO INTERNET DATA
PLANS
On April 20, 2017, the CRTC released Telecom Regulatory Policy
CRTC 2017-104, Framework for assessing the differential pricing
practices of Internet service providers, setting out the evaluation
criteria it will apply to determine whether a specific differential
pricing practice complies with subsection 27(2) of
the
Telecommunications Act on a case-by-case basis, as follows:
• the degree to which the treatment of data is agnostic (i.e., data is

treated equally regardless of its source or nature);

• whether the offering is exclusive to certain customers or certain

content providers;

• the impact on Internet openness and innovation; and
• whether there is financial compensation involved.

Of these criteria, the degree to which data is treated agnostically will
generally carry the most weight. The overriding expectation is that all
content and applications will be treated in a neutral manner. Zero-
rating of account management functions (e.g., monitoring of Internet
data usage or the payment of bills online) will generally be permitted.

WHOLESALE INTERNET COSTING AND PRICING
On March 31, 2016, the CRTC released its decision on the review
of costing inputs and the application process for existing wholesale
high-speed access services that provide for a single provincial point
of interconnection, but which are not available over FTTH access
facilities (Telecom Decision CRTC 2016-117, Review of costing
inputs and the application process for wholesale high-speed
access). The CRTC determined that wholesale telecom rates paid
by competitive telecom providers were no longer appropriate, and
required all wholesale high-speed access service providers to file
new cost studies with proposed rates for final approval. The CRTC
further determined that all wholesale Internet rates that were
currently approved were to be made interim as of the date of the
decision. The CRTC will assess the extent to which,
if at all,
retroactivity will apply when new cost studies are submitted in
support of revised wholesale high-speed access service rates. On
June 30, 2016, we filed our new cost studies with the CRTC, which
detailed our proposed rates.

On October 6, 2016, the CRTC issued Telecom Order 2016-396,
Tariff notice applications concerning aggregated wholesale high-
speed access services – Revised interim rates, significantly reducing
existing interim rates for the capacity charge tariff component of
wholesale high-speed access service pending approval of final
rates. The interim rate reductions took effect immediately. The
CRTC will assess the extent to which, if at all, retroactivity will apply
when wholesale high-speed access service rates are set on a final
basis. The process to set final rates has concluded and a decision is
anticipated in early 2019.

CRTC REVIEW OF WHOLESALE WIRELINE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
On July 22, 2015, the CRTC released its decision on the regulatory
framework for wholesale wireline services (Telecom Regulatory
Policy 2015-326, Review of wholesale wireline services and
associated policies), determining which wireline services, and under
what terms and conditions, facilities-based telecommunications
carriers must make available to other telecommunications service

providers, such as resellers. The CRTC determined that wholesale
high-speed access services, which are used to support retail
competition for services, such as local phone, television, and
Internet access, would continue to be mandated. The provision of
provincially aggregated services, however, would no longer be
mandated and would be phased out in conjunction with the
implementation of a disaggregated service with connections at
telephone company central offices and cable company head-ends.
The requirement to implement disaggregated wholesale high-
speed access services will
include making them available over
fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) access facilities. Regulated rates will
continue to be based on long-run increment cost studies.

including over

On September 20, 2016, the CRTC released Telecom Decision
CRTC 2016-379, Follow-up to Telecom Regulatory Policy 2015-326
– Implementation of a disaggregated wholesale high-speed access
service,
fibre-to-the premises access facilities,
addressing the technical implementation of new, disaggregated,
high-speed access TPIA, a service that will provide access to FTTP
facilities as ordered in the CRTC’s July 22, 2015 ruling. The decision
is consistent with the positions submitted by Rogers in our filings.
Proposed tariffs and supporting cost studies for the new service
were filed on January 9, 2017, with further information filed later in
2017 and 2018. A decision on final rates is anticipated in early
2019.

CRTC REVIEW OF LOCAL AND COMMUNITY
PROGRAMMING
On June 15, 2016, the CRTC released Broadcasting Regulatory
Policy CRTC 2016-224, Policy framework for local and community
television. The CRTC created a new model for BDU contributions to
Canadian programming that took effect on September 1, 2017.
remain at 5% of annual gross
Annual contributions will
broadcasting revenues; however, of that amount, in all licensed
cable systems, up to 1.5% (rather than the previous 2%) can be
used to fund community channel programming. Of this revenue,
0.3% must now go to a newly-created Independent Local News
Fund for independently-owned local TV stations, and the remaining
funding will continue to go to the Canada Media Fund and
independent production funds. This decision provides the flexibility
for BDUs that operate community channels in large markets
(Montreal, Toronto, Edmonton, Calgary, and Vancouver) to now
direct their community channel revenues from those markets to
fund either community channel programming in smaller markets,
or to fund local news on TV stations (such as CityTV, in the case of
Rogers). Rogers has closed its Toronto community channels and
redirected these revenues.

TELEVISION SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
In November 2014, the CRTC released its first decision arising from
the Let’s Talk TV hearing ordering the elimination of the 30-day
cancellation provision for cable,
Internet, and phone services,
effective January 23, 2015.

On January 29, 2015, the CRTC released decisions requiring local
stations to continue over-the-air transmission under the same
regulatory regime currently in place and maintaining simultaneous
substitution requirements, except
the NFL Super Bowl,
beginning in 2017. In a related decision released the same day, the
CRTC found that it would be an undue preference under the
Telecommunications Act for a vertically integrated company that

for

72

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

offers a Mobile TV service to exempt this service from standard
monthly wireless data caps and usage charges generally applicable
to its wireless service.

On March 19, 2015, the CRTC released the third of its decisions
related to its Let’s Talk TV proceeding. The CRTC ordered
distributors to offer customers an option for a small basic service
consisting only of Canadian local channels (local radio is optional),
national mandatory services, community and provincial legislature
channels, and, should they wish, US 4+1 networks beginning
March 1, 2016. The retail rate for this entry-level service will be
capped at $25 per month (excluding equipment). The CRTC
adopted phased-in requirements for selling channels to customers
“à la carte” and as part of “pick-packs”. All channels above the basic
tier must be offered on an à la carte basis or in smaller, reasonably
priced packages by March 1, 2016. By December 1, 2016, they
must be offered in both forms. As a BDU, we will be permitted to
continue to offer our existing basic service and programming
packages. The CRTC will also revise its existing “preponderance”
rule so that consumers will have to be offered, but will not have to
receive, a majority of Canadian services.

The CRTC also proposed several changes to the Wholesale Code
(formerly the Vertical Integration (VI) Code) addressing, amongst
other matters, penetration-based rate cards and minimum
guarantees. All licensed programmers and BDUs will be required
to comply with the Wholesale Code, which came into effect on
January 22, 2016.

The March 19 decision also addressed rules for distribution of
foreign services authorized for distribution in Canada, including
requirements that foreign services make their channels available “à
la carte” and in “pick-packs” or in smaller pre-assembled packages
and abide by the Wholesale Code. Access rules for VI-owned
services and independent services, channel packaging, and
buy-through rules for multicultural services were also addressed.

to govern certain aspects of

On March 26, 2015, in the final decision related to Let’s Talk TV, the
CRTC announced plans to establish a Television Service Provider
the
(TVSP) Code of Conduct
relationship between TVSPs and their customers as well as to allow
consumers to complain to the Commissioner for Complaints for
Telecommunications Services about their providers. On January 8,
2016, the CRTC issued the final version of the TVSP Code, which
came into effect on September 1, 2017. Upon launch of the TVSP
Code, the Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications
Services changed its name to Commission for Complaints for
Telecom-television Services (CCTS). This decision also introduced
new requirements related to the provision of service to persons
with disabilities for both BDUs and broadcasters.

On March 1, 2016, the first phase of the CRTC’s small basic $25 per
month (excluding equipment) television service mandate came
into effect. Effective March 1, 2016, we offer a small basic service
consisting of Canadian local channels, national mandatory services,
community and provincial legislature channels, and the US 4+1
networks. We also offer smaller, reasonably priced packages of
specialty and premium channels. On December 1, 2016, we began
offering all specialty and premium channels on an “à la carte” basis
as well.

ROGERS CABLE TV LICENCE RENEWALS
On May 24, 2016, the CRTC released Broadcasting Notice of
Consultation CRTC 2016-197, Broadcasting licence renewals of
terrestrial broadcasting distribution undertakings (BDUs) that will
expire in 2016; implementation of certain conditions of licence and
review of practices in regard to the small basic service and flexible
packaging requirements for all BDU licensees, stating that a hearing
will be held in consideration of the licence renewal applications of
BDUs,
including Rogers. The hearing, which commenced on
September 7, 2016, reviewed the practices of all BDU licensees in
regard to the small basic service and flexible packaging
requirements described above that came into effect on March 1,
2016.

On November 21, 2016, the CRTC released Broadcasting Decision
CRTC 2016-458, Licence renewal of broadcasting distribution
undertakings – Review of practices relating to the small basic service
and flexible packaging options and imposition of
various
requirements, renewing Rogers’ BDU licences from December 1,
2016 to November 30, 2017. In the decision, the CRTC established
what it called a set of best practices for BDUs that serve to promote
choice for Canadians and stated that it would monitor all of these
practices, including how BDUs promote and offer the small basic
service and pick-and-pay and small package options, and will take
any necessary remedial action when it examines the renewal of the
licences for BDUs again in 2017 for a full renewal term. Prior to the
2017 licence renewal hearing that occurred in October, Rogers’
cable licence received an administrative extension to May 31, 2018.

in Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2018-265,
On August 2, 2018,
Rogers – Licence renewal
for various terrestrial broadcasting
distribution undertakings, the CRTC renewed Rogers’ Broadcasting
Distribution Undertaking licences in Ontario and Atlantic Canada
for a full seven-year licence term with conditions substantially
consistent with Rogers’ application.

CRTC PROCEEDING ON FUTURE PROGRAMMING
DISTRIBUTION MODELS
On October 12, 2017, prompted by Order in Council P.C. 2017-
1195, the CRTC initiated a proceeding (Broadcasting Notice of
Consultation CRTC 2017-359, Call for comments on the Governor
in Council’s request for a report on future programming distribution
to report on the distribution model or models of
models)
programming that are likely to exist in the future; how and through
whom Canadians will access that programming; and the extent to
which these models will ensure a vibrant domestic market that is
capable of supporting the continued creation, production, and
distribution of Canadian programming, in both official languages,
including original entertainment and information programming.
The report was due no later than June 1, 2018. Rogers filed its
Phase I and Phase II submissions on December 1, 2017 and
February 13, 2018, respectively.

On May 30, 2018,
the CRTC issued its report on future
programming distribution models requested by the government in
September 2017 through Order in Council P.C. 2017-1195. The
report proposes new tools and regulatory approaches to support
the production and promotion of audio and video content made
inform the government’s
by and for Canadians. The report will

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

73

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

review of the Broadcasting Act (Canada) and Telecommunications
Act (Canada).

over-the-air ethnic OMNI television licences were renewed for a
three-year period in this Broadcasting Decision.

MEDIA

the distribution of

COPYRIGHT RETRANSMISSION OF DISTANT SIGNALS
Pursuant to section 31(2) of the Copyright Act, television service
providers are permitted to retransmit programming within distant
over-the-air television signals as part of a compulsory licensing
the programming are
regime. Rates for
established through negotiation or set by the Copyright Board.
Distributors and content providers were unable to agree on a new
rate for the distribution of distant signals after the expiration of the
current agreement in 2013. A proceeding was initiated by the
Copyright Board, which began on November 23, 2015. The
proceeding continued into 2016 and 2017; a decision was
rendered on December 18, 2018.

The decision increased the rate paid by BDUs by approximately 8%
for 2014, a further 7.5% for 2015, and a further 2.5% for 2016, with
2017 and 2018 held constant at the 2016 rate. The impact of these
additional costs is not material.

LICENCE RENEWALS
In a proceeding initiated by Broadcasting Notice of Consultation
CRTC 2016-225, Renewal of television licences held by large English-
and French-language ownership groups, released June 15, 2016,
Rogers sought
renewal of our group-based licences (six City
over-the-air English stations, Sportsnet 360, VICELAND, G4Tech,
Outdoor Life, FX, and FXX), our five over-the-air ethnic OMNI
television licences, and our mainstream sports licences (Sportsnet
and Sportsnet One). We also sought approval of an application
seeking a new licence to operate a discretionary service called OMNI
Regional, which would operate pursuant to a section 9(1)(h) order
granting it mandatory carriage on the basic service with a regulated
affiliation fee.

renewals of our group-based licences. Five-year

On May 18, 2017, the CRTC released Broadcasting Decision CRTC
2017-151, Rogers Media Inc. – Licence renewals for English-
language television stations, services and network, approving five-
year
licence
renewals were also approved for our mainstream sports services
licences (Sportsnet and Sportsnet One) and our on-demand
service (Rogers on Demand). To coincide with the expiry date of
the broadcasting licence for our new discretionary service, OMNI
Regional, discussed below, the broadcasting licences for our five

In Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2017-152, OMNI Regional –
National, multilingual multi-ethnic discretionary service, released the
same day, the CRTC also approved our application seeking a new
licence to operate a discretionary service called OMNI Regional,
which would operate pursuant to a section 9(1)(h) order, granting it
mandatory carriage on the basic service with a regulated affiliation
fee of $0.12/subscriber/month for a three-year term. The CRTC
further issued a call (Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2017-154,
Call
for applications for a national, multilingual multi-ethnic
television service offering news and information programming) for
competing applications to determine whether OMNI should retain
its 9(1)(h) designation after three years or whether the designation
should be granted to another applicant.

On August 14, 2017, the Governor in Council, on the advice of the
Minister of Canadian Heritage through Order in Council P.C. 2017-
1060, directed the CRTC to reconsider its group licence renewal
decisions issued May 15, 2017 for large television broadcasters
that, among other changes, lowered the amount that some major
broadcasters must spend on Programs of National Interest. The
CRTC is to “consider how it can be ensured that significant
contributions are made to the creation and presentation of
programs of national interest, music programming, short films, and
short-form documentaries.”

On August 30, 2018, in Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2018-335,
licence renewal decisions for the television
Reconsideration of
services of large English-language private ownership groups, the
CRTC determined that Rogers’ PNI expenditure requirements will
be maintained at 5% of
the previous broadcast year’s gross
revenues as determined in the original decision. Rogers and other
groups will be required to direct 0.17% of previous broadcast year’s
gross revenues to support music programming. This amount may
be counted towards meeting the Canadian programming
expenditure requirement. No additional expenditures were
ordered for short-form content. The conditions of licence will apply
until August 31, 2022, the end of the five-year licence term.

With regard to Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2017-154
referenced above calling for competing applications to determine
whether OMNI should retain its 9(1)(h) designation after three years
the designation should be granted to another
or whether
applicant,
the CRTC oral hearing on the matter occurred in
November 2018. A decision will be rendered in 2019.

74

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Other Information

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

liabilities,

revenue, and expenses, and our

Management makes judgments, estimates, and assumptions that
affect how accounting policies are applied, the amounts we report
in assets,
related
disclosure about contingent assets and liabilities. Significant
changes in our assumptions, including those related to our future
business plans and cash flows, could materially change the
amounts we record. Actual results could be different from these
estimates.

to our business operations and
These estimates are critical
understanding our results of operations. We may need to use
additional judgment because of the sensitivity of the methods and
assumptions used in determining the asset, liability, revenue, and
expense amounts.

ESTIMATES

REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Determining the transaction price
The transaction price is the amount of consideration that
is
enforceable and to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for
the goods and services we have promised to our customer. We
determine the transaction price by considering the terms of the
contract and business practices that are customary within that
particular line of business. Discounts, rebates, refunds, credits, price
concessions,
incentives, penalties, and other similar items are
reflected in the transaction price at contract inception.

Determining the stand-alone selling price and the allocation of the
transaction price
The transaction price is allocated to performance obligations based
on the relative stand-alone selling prices of the distinct goods or
services in the contract. The best evidence of a stand-alone selling
price is the observable price of a good or service when the entity
sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to
similar customers.
If a stand-alone selling price is not directly
observable, we estimate the stand-alone selling price taking into
account reasonably available information relating to the market
conditions, entity-specific factors, and the class of customer.

In determining the stand-alone selling price, we allocate revenue
between performance obligations based on expected minimum
enforceable amounts to which Rogers is entitled. Any amounts
above the minimum enforceable amounts are recognized as
revenue as they are earned.

FAIR VALUE
We use estimates to determine the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in an acquisition, using the best available
information, including information from financial markets. These
estimates include key assumptions such as discount rates, attrition
rates, and terminal growth rates for performing discounted cash
flow analyses.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

USEFUL LIVES
We depreciate the cost of property, plant and equipment over their
estimated useful lives by considering industry trends and company-
specific factors, including changing technologies and expectations
for the in-service period of certain assets at the time. We reassess
our estimates of useful
lives annually, or when circumstances
change, to ensure they match the anticipated life of the technology
If technological change
from a revenue-producing perspective.
happens more quickly, or in a different way, than anticipated, we
might have to reduce the estimated life of property, plant and
equipment, which could result in a higher depreciation expense in
future periods or an impairment charge to write down the value.
We monitor and review our depreciation rates and asset useful lives
at least once a year and change them if they are different from our
previous estimates. We recognize the effect of changes in
estimates in net income prospectively.

CAPITALIZING DIRECT LABOUR, OVERHEAD, AND
INTEREST
Certain direct labour, overhead, and interest costs associated with
the acquisition, construction, development, or improvement of our
networks are capitalized to property, plant and equipment. The
capitalized amounts are calculated based on estimated costs of
projects that are capital in nature, and are generally based on a
per-hour rate.
interest costs are capitalized during
development and construction of certain property, plant and
equipment. Capitalized amounts increase the cost of the asset and
result in a higher depreciation expense in future periods.

In addition,

IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
Indefinite-life intangible assets (including goodwill and spectrum
and/or broadcast licences) are assessed for impairment on an
annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances warrant, and
finite-life assets (including property, plant and equipment and
other intangible assets) are assessed for impairment if events or
circumstances warrant. The recoverable amount of a cash
generating unit (CGU) involves significant estimates such as future
cash flows,
If key
estimates differ unfavourably in the future, we could experience
impairment charges that could decrease net income.

terminal growth rates, and discount rates.

SEGMENTS
We make significant judgments in determining our operating
segments. These are components that engage in business activities
from which they may earn revenue and incur expenses, for which
operating results are regularly reviewed by our chief operating
decision makers to make decisions about resources to be allocated
and to assess component performance, and for which discrete
financial information is available.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair values of our derivatives are recorded using an estimated
credit-adjusted mark-to-market valuation. If the derivatives are in an
asset position (i.e. the counterparty owes Rogers), the credit spread
for the bank counterparty is added to the risk-free discount rate to
determine the estimated credit-adjusted value. If the derivatives are
in a liability position (i.e. Rogers owes the counterparty), our credit

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

75

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

spread is added to the risk-free discount rate. The estimated credit-
adjusted value of derivatives requires assessment of the credit risk
of the parties to the instruments and the instruments’ discount
rates.

For all derivative instruments where hedge accounting is applied,
we are required to ensure that the hedging relationships meet
hedge effectiveness criteria. Hedge effectiveness testing requires
the use of both judgments and estimates.

PENSION BENEFITS
When we account for defined benefit pension plans, assumptions
are made in determining the valuation of benefit obligations.
Assumptions and estimates include the discount rate, the rate of
future compensation increase, and the mortality rate. Changes to
these primary assumptions and estimates would affect the pension
expense, pension asset and liability, and other comprehensive
income. Changes in economic conditions,
including financial
markets and interest rates, may also have an impact on our pension
plan, as there is no assurance that the plan will be able to earn the
assumed rate of return. Market-driven changes may also result in
changes in the discount rates and other variables that could require
us to make contributions in the future that differ significantly from
the current contributions and assumptions incorporated into the
actuarial valuation process.

Below is a summary of the effect an increase or decrease in the
primary assumptions and estimates would have had on our
accrued benefit obligation and pension expense for 2018.

(In millions of dollars)

Discount rate

Impact of 0.5% increase
Impact of 0.5% decrease

Rate of future compensation increase

Impact of 0.25% increase
Impact of 0.25% decrease

Mortality rate

Impact of 1 year increase
Impact of 1 year decrease

Increase (decrease)
in accrued
benefit obligation

(196)
224

16
(16)

47
(50)

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock option plans
Our employee stock option plans attach cash-settled share
appreciation rights (SARs)
to all new and previously granted
options. The SAR feature allows the option holder to elect to
receive a cash payment equal to the intrinsic value of the option,
instead of exercising the option and acquiring Class B Non-Voting
Shares.

We measure stock-based compensation to employees at fair value.
We determine the fair value of options using our Class B
Non-Voting Share price and option pricing models, and record all
outstanding stock options as liabilities. The liability is marked to
market each period and is amortized to expense using a graded
vesting approach over the period during which employee services
are rendered, or over the period to the date an employee is
eligible to retire, whichever is shorter. The expense in each period
is affected by the change in the price of our Class B Non-Voting
Shares during the period.

76

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Restricted share unit (RSU) and deferred share unit (DSU) plans
We recognize outstanding RSUs and DSUs as liabilities, measuring
the liabilities and compensation costs based on the awards’ fair
values, which are based on the market price of the Class B
Non-Voting Shares, and recognizing them as charges to operating
costs over the vesting period of the awards. If an award’s fair value
changes after it has been granted and before the exercise date, we
recognize the resulting changes in the liability within operating
costs in the year the change occurs. For RSUs, the payment amount
is established as of the vesting date. For DSUs, the payment
amount is established as of the exercise date.

JUDGMENTS

REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Distinct goods and services
We make judgments in determining whether a promise to deliver
goods or services is considered distinct. We account for individual
products and services separately if they are distinct (i.e. if a product
or service is separately identifiable from other items in the bundled
package and if the customer can benefit from it). The consideration
is allocated between separate products and services in a bundle
based on their stand-alone selling prices. For items we do not sell
separately (e.g. third-party gift cards), we estimate stand-alone
selling prices using the adjusted market assessment approach.

Determining costs to obtain or fulfill a contract
Determining the costs we incur to obtain or fulfill a contract that
meet the deferral criteria within IFRS 15 requires us to make
significant judgments. We expect incremental commission fees
paid to internal and external representatives as a result of obtaining
contracts with customers to be recoverable.

USEFUL LIVES AND DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
METHODS
We make significant
for
depreciating our property, plant and equipment that we believe
most accurately represent the consumption of benefits derived
from those assets and are most representative of the economic
substance of the intended use of the underlying assets.

in choosing methods

judgments

We amortize the cost of intangible assets with finite lives over their
estimated useful lives. We review their useful lives, residual values,
and the amortization methods at least once a year.

We do not amortize intangible assets with indefinite lives
(spectrum, broadcast licences, and certain brand names) as there is
no foreseeable limit to the period over which these assets are
expected to generate net cash inflows for us. We make judgments
to determine that these assets have indefinite lives, analyzing all
relevant factors, including the expected usage of the asset, the
typical life cycle of the asset, and anticipated changes in the market
demand for the products and services the asset helps generate.
After review of the competitive, legal, regulatory, and other factors,
it is our view that these factors do not limit the useful lives of our
spectrum and broadcast licences.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Judgment is also applied in choosing methods for amortizing our
intangible assets and program rights that we believe most
accurately represent the consumption of those assets and are most
representative of the economic substance of the intended use of
the underlying assets.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

We have entered into certain transactions in the normal course of
business with related parties in which we have an equity interest.
The amounts received from or paid to these parties were as follows:

The

testing.

allocation of goodwill

to CGUs or groups of CGUs for

IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
We make judgments in determining CGUs and the allocation of
the purpose of
goodwill
involves
impairment
considerable management judgment in determining the CGUs (or
groups of CGUs) that are expected to benefit from the synergies of
a business combination. A CGU is the smallest identifiable group
of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent
of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. Goodwill
and indefinite-life intangible assets are allocated to CGUs (or
groups of CGUs) based on the level at which management
monitors goodwill, which is not higher than an operating segment.

HEDGE ACCOUNTING
We make significant
judgments in determining whether our
financial instruments qualify for hedge accounting, including our
determination of hedge effectiveness.

INCOME TAXES AND OTHER TAXES
We accrue income and other tax provisions based on information
currently available in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate.
While we believe we have paid and provided for adequate
amounts of tax, our business is complex and significant judgment is
required in interpreting how tax legislation and regulations apply to
us. Our tax filings are subject to audit by the relevant government
revenue authorities and the results of the government audit could
materially change the amount of our actual income tax expense,
income tax payable or
taxes payable or
receivable, and deferred income tax assets and liabilities and could,
in certain circumstances, result in the assessment of interest and
penalties.

receivable, other

liabilities. Our

CONTINGENCIES
is involved in the determination of
Considerable judgment
contingent
is based on information
judgment
currently known to us, and the probability of the ultimate resolution
of the contingencies. If it becomes probable that a contingent
liability will result in an outflow of economic resources, we will
record a provision in the period the change in probability occurs.
The amount of the loss involves judgment based on information
available at that time. Any provision recognized for a contingent
liability could be material to our consolidated financial position and
results of operations.

ONEROUS CONTRACTS
Significant judgment is required to determine when we are subject
to unavoidable costs arising from onerous contracts. These
judgments may include, for example, whether a certain promise is
legally binding or whether we may be successful in negotiations
with the counterparty.

(In millions of dollars)

Revenue
Purchases

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

% Chg

86
197

74
198

16
(1)

We have entered into business transactions with companies whose
partners or senior officers are Directors of RCI. These Directors are:
• the non-executive chairman of a law firm that provides a portion

of the Company’s legal services; and

• the chairman of a company that provides printing services to the

Company.

(In millions of dollars)

Printing and legal services

Years ended December 31

2018

13

2017

17

We have also entered into certain transactions with our controlling
shareholder and companies it controls. These transactions are
subject to formal agreements approved by the Audit and Risk
Committee. Total amounts paid to these related parties generally
reflect the charges to Rogers for occasional business use of aircraft,
net of other administrative services, and were less than $1 million
for each of 2018 and 2017.

These transactions are measured at the amount agreed to by the
related parties, which are also reviewed by the Audit and Risk
Committee. The amounts owing are unsecured, interest-free, and
due for payment in cash within one month from the date of the
transaction.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED IN
2018

We adopted the following IFRS amendments in 2018. They did not
have a material effect on our financial statements.

• Amendments to IFRS 2, Share-based payment, providing
guidance on accounting for vesting and non-vesting conditions
in regards to share-based compensation.

• IFRIC 22,

Foreign

currency

transaction and advanced
consideration, clarifying the requirements in determining the
date of transactions and which foreign exchange rate to use in
when translating assets, expenses, or
income on initial
recognition.

Additionally, we adopted IFRS 15 and IFRS 9, Financial instruments
(IFRS 9) effective January 1, 2018. The effects these two new
pronouncements have on our results and operations are described
below.

IFRS 15, REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
(IFRS 15)
IFRS 15 supersedes previous accounting standards for revenue,
including IAS 18, Revenue (IAS 18) and IFRIC 13, Customer loyalty
programmes (IFRIC 13).

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

77

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

IFRS 15 introduced a single model for recognizing revenue from
contracts with customers. This standard applies to all contracts with
customers, with only some exceptions, including certain contracts
accounted for under other IFRSs. The standard requires revenue to
be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of promised
goods or services to a customer and at an amount that reflects the
consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring
those goods or services. This is achieved by applying the following
five steps:

identify the contract with a customer;
identify the performance obligations in the contract;

1.
2.
3. determine the transaction price;
4.

allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
in the contract; and
recognize revenue when (or as)
performance obligation.

the entity satisfies a

5.

IFRS 15 also provides guidance relating to the treatment of contract
acquisition and contract fulfillment costs.

The application of this new standard has significant impacts on our
reported Wireless results, specifically with regards to the timing of
recognition and classification of revenue, and the treatment of
costs incurred in acquiring customer contracts. The timing of
recognition and classification of revenue is affected because, at
contract
total
consideration over the contract term and the allocation of that
consideration to all performance obligations in the contract based
on their relative stand-alone selling prices. This affects our Wireless
arrangements that bundle equipment and service together into

IFRS 15 requires the estimation of

inception,

monthly service fees, which results in an increase to equipment
revenue recognized at contract inception and a decrease to service
revenue recognized over
the contracts. The
application of
IFRS 15 does not affect our cash flows from
operations or the methods and underlying economics through
which we transact with our customers.

the course of

The treatment of costs incurred in acquiring customer contracts is
affected as IFRS 15 requires certain contract acquisition costs (such
as sales commissions) to be recognized as an asset and amortized
into operating expenses over time. Previously, such costs were
expensed as incurred.

In addition, new assets and liabilities have been recognized on our
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Specifically, a
contract asset and contract liability is recognized to account for any
timing differences between the revenue recognized and the
amounts billed to the customer.

Significant judgment is needed to determine whether a promise to
deliver goods or services is considered distinct and in determining
the costs that are incremental to obtaining a contract with a
customer.

We have retrospectively applied IFRS 15 to all contracts that were
not complete on the date of initial application. We have made a
policy choice to restate each prior period presented and have
recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying IFRS 15 as an
adjustment to the opening balance of equity as at January 1, 2017,
subject
to certain practical expedients we adopted that are
described in note 5 to our 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements.

EFFECT OF IFRS 15 TRANSITION
Below is a summary of the IFRS 15 adjustments on our key financial information for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, all of
which pertain to our Wireless segment.

(In millions of dollars)

Consolidated
Total revenue
Total service revenue 2
Adjusted EBITDA 3

Net income
Adjusted net income 3

Wireless
Service revenue
Equipment revenue

Operating expenses 4

Adjusted EBITDA

Year ended December 31, 2017

As previously

Reference

reported 1 Adjustments

Restated

i, iii
i

i
i, iii

ii, iii

14,143
13,560
5,318

1,711
1,768

7,775
568

4,801

3,542

226
(1,010)
184

134
134

(1,010)
1,236

42

184

14,369
12,550
5,502

1,845
1,902

6,765
1,804

4,843

3,726

1 Amounts calculated on a basis consistent with our previous revenue recognition accounting policies prior to adopting IFRS 15. Certain amounts presented under prior accounting

basis have been retrospectively amended as a result of our use of adjusted EBITDA in 2018.

2 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.
3 Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures and should not be considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms
under IFRS and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these
measures, including how we calculate them.

4 Operating expenses have been retrospectively amended to include stock-based compensation. See “Reportable Segments” and “Non-GAAP Measures”.

78

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

Below is a summary of the IFRS 15 adjustments on certain key financial metrics from our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as
at January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017.

(in millions of dollars)

Reference

reported Adjustments Restated

reported Adjustments Restated

As previously

As previously

As at January 1, 2017

As at December 31, 2017

Consolidated
Total assets
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity

i, ii, iii
i, iii

28,342
23,073
5,269

1,469
454
1,015

29,811
23,527
6,284

28,863
22,516
6,347

1,627
478
1,149

30,490
22,994
7,496

The application of IFRS 15 did not affect our cash flow totals from operating, investing, or financing activities.

i) Contract assets and liabilities
Contract assets arise primarily as a result of the difference between
revenue recognized on the sale of a wireless device at the onset of
a term contract and the cash collected at the point of sale. Revenue
recognized at point of sale requires the estimation of
total
consideration over the contract term and the allocation of that
consideration to all performance obligations in the contract based
on their relative stand-alone selling prices. For Wireless term
contracts, revenue is recognized earlier than previously reported,
with a larger allocation to equipment revenue. Prior to the adoption
of IFRS 15, the amount allocated to equipment revenue was limited
to the non-contingent consideration received at the point of sale
when recovery of the remaining consideration in the contract was
contingent upon the delivery of future services.

We record a contract liability when we receive payment from a
customer in advance of providing goods and services. We account
for contract assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis,
with each contract being presented as a single net contract asset or
net contract liability accordingly.

All contract assets are recorded net of an allowance for expected
credit losses, measured in accordance with IFRS 9.

ii) Deferred commission cost assets
Under IFRS 15, we defer incremental commission costs paid to
internal and external representatives as a result of obtaining
contracts with customers as deferred commission cost assets and
amortize them to operating expenses over the pattern of the
transfer of goods and services to the customer, which is typically
evenly over either 12 or 24 consecutive months.

iii) Inventories and other current liabilities
Under IFRS 15, we determine when the customer obtains control of
the distinct good or service. For affected transactions, we have
defined our customer as the end subscriber and determined that
they obtain control when they receive possession of a wireless
device, which typically occurs upon activation. For certain
transactions through third-party dealers and other retailers, the
timing of when the customer obtains control of a wireless device
will be deferred in comparison to our previous policy, where
revenue was recognized when the wireless device was delivered
and accepted by the independent dealer. This results in a greater
inventory balance and a corresponding increase in other current
liabilities.

IAS 39, Financial

IFRS 9, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (IFRS 9)
In July 2014, the IASB issued the final publication of the IFRS 9
standard, which supersedes
Instruments:
recognition and measurement (IAS 39). IFRS 9 includes revised
guidance on the classification and measurement of
financial
instruments, new guidance for measuring impairment on financial
assets, and new hedge accounting guidance. We have adopted
IFRS 9 on a retrospective basis; however, our 2017 comparatives
were not restated because it was not possible to do so without the
use of hindsight.

Under IFRS 9, financial assets are classified and measured based on
the business model in which they are held and the characteristics of
IFRS 9 contains three primary
their contractual cash flows.
measurement categories
financial assets: measured at
for
amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income
(FVTOCI), and fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL). Under IFRS
9, we have irrevocably elected to present subsequent changes in
the fair
that are neither
held-for-trading nor contingent consideration arising from a
business combination in other comprehensive income with no
reclassification of net gains and losses to net income. For these
equity investments, any impairment on the instrument will be
recorded in other comprehensive income, and cumulative gains or
losses in other comprehensive income will not be reclassified into
net income, including upon disposal.

value of our equity investments

Under IFRS 9, the loss allowance for trade receivables must be
calculated using the expected lifetime credit loss and recorded at
the time of initial recognition. A portion of our trade receivables
required an incremental loss allowance in order to comply with the
requirements of IFRS 9; as a result, we recognized a $4 million
decrease to accounts receivable and a corresponding decrease to
retained earnings within shareholders’ equity effective January 1,
2018. In addition, the expected loss allowance using the lifetime
credit loss approach is applied to contract assets under IFRS 15.
There is no significant effect on the carrying value of our other
financial instruments under IFRS 9 related to this new requirement.

the requirement

The new hedge accounting guidance aligns hedge accounting more
closely with an entity’s risk management objectives and strategies.
IFRS 9 does not fundamentally change the types of hedging
relationships or
to measure and recognize
ineffectiveness; however, it allows more hedging strategies used for
risk management to qualify for hedge accounting and introduces
more judgment to assess the effectiveness of a hedging relationship,
primarily from a qualitative standpoint. This is not expected to have
an effect on our reported results and will simplify our application of
effectiveness tests going forward.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

79

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET
ADOPTED

The IASB has issued the following new standard that will become
effective in a future year and will have an impact on our
consolidated financial statements in future periods.

IFRS 16, LEASES (IFRS 16)
Effective January 1, 2019, we will adopt IFRS 16. Our first quarter
financial
2019 interim financial statements will be our
statements issued in accordance with IFRS 16. IFRS 16 supersedes
the current accounting standards for leases,
including IAS 17,
Leases (IAS 17) and IFRIC 4, Determining whether an arrangement
contains a lease (IFRIC 4).

first

IFRS 16 introduces a single accounting model for lessees unless
the underlying asset is of low value. A lessee will be required to
recognize, on its statement of financial position, a right-of-use asset,
representing its right to use the underlying leased asset, and a
lease liability, representing its obligation to make lease payments.
As a result of adopting IFRS 16, we will recognize a significant
increase to both assets and liabilities on our Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position, as well as a decrease to operating
costs (for the removal of rent expense for leases), an increase to
depreciation and amortization (due to depreciation of the right-of-
use asset), and an increase to finance costs (due to accretion of the
lease liability). The accounting treatment for lessors will remain
largely the same as under IAS 17.

IFRS 16 with the cumulative effect of

initial
We will adopt
application recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings
within shareholders’ equity on January 1, 2019. We will not restate
comparatives for 2018. At transition, we will apply the practical
expedient available to us as lessee that allows us to apply this
standard to contracts that were previously identified as leases
under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. Conversely, we will not apply this
standard to contracts that were previously not identified as leases
under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4.

For leases that were classified as operating leases under IAS 17,
lease liabilities at transition will be measured at the present value of
remaining lease payments, discounted at the related incremental

transition will be measured at an amount equal

borrowing rate as at January 1, 2019. Generally, right-of-use assets
to the
at
corresponding lease liabilities, adjusted for any prepaid or accrued
rent outstanding. For certain leases where we have readily available
information, we will elect to measure the right-of-use assets at their
carrying amounts as if IFRS 16 had been applied since the lease
commencement date using the related incremental borrowing rate
for the remaining lease period as at January 1, 2019.

When applying IFRS 16 to leases previously classified as operating
leases, the following practical expedients are available to us. We
will:
• apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with similar

characteristics;

• exclude initial direct costs from measuring the right-of-use asset

as at January 1, 2019; and

• use hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract

contains purchase, extension, or termination options.

We have elected to not separate fixed non-lease components from
lease components and instead account for each lease component
and associated fixed non-lease components as a single lease
component. We do not intend to elect the recognition exemptions
on short-term leases or low-value leases; however, we may choose
to elect the recognition exemptions on a class-by-class basis for
new classes, and lease-by-lease basis, respectively, in the future.

We do not expect significant impacts for contracts in which we are
the lessor.

We have a team engaged to ensuring our compliance with IFRS 16,
including overseeing the implementation of a new lease system
that enables us to comply with the requirements of the standard on
a contract-by-contract basis. This team has been responsible for
determining and implementing additional process requirements,
ensuring our data collection is appropriate, system testing,
developing related internal controls, and communicating the
upcoming changes with various stakeholders. We had detailed
data validation processes that operated throughout the course of
2018.

80

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

EFFECT OF TRANSITION TO IFRS 16
Below is the estimated effect of transition to IFRS 16 on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at January 1, 2019.

(in billions of dollars)

Assets
Current assets:

Other current assets
Remainder of current assets

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment
Remainder of long-term assets

Total assets

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Current portion of lease liabilities
Remainder of current liabilities

Total current liabilities

Lease liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Remainder of long-term liabilities

Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Reference

As reported as at
December 31, 2018

Estimated effect of
IFRS 16 transition

Subsequent to
transition as at
January 1, 2019

i

i

i

0.4
4.5

4.9

11.8
15.2

31.9

3.1
–
3.7

6.8

–
2.9
14.0

23.7

8.2

31.9

***
–

***

1.5
–

1.5

(0.1)
0.2
–

0.1

1.4
***
–

1.5

***

1.5

0.4
4.5

4.9

13.3
15.2

33.4

3.0
0.2
3.7

6.9

1.4
2.9
14.0

25.2

8.2

33.4

*** Amounts less than $0.1 billion; these amounts have been excluded from subtotals.

i) Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities
We will record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the date of
transition. The lease liability will initially be measured at the present
value of lease payments that remain to be paid at the date of
transition. Lease payments included in the measurement of the
lease liability will include:
• fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;
• variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate;
• amounts expected to be payable under a residual value

guarantee; and

• the exercise price under a purchase option that we are
reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional
renewal period if we are reasonably certain to exercise an
extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease
unless we are reasonably certain not to terminate early.

Upon transition, except
for those leases where we have the
information to measure the right-of-use assets at their carrying
IFRS 16 had been applied since the lease
amounts as if
commencement date, the right-of-use asset will be measured at
the amount of the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any

lease
prepaid or accrued lease payments relating to that
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
immediately before the date of initial application.

After transition, the right-of-use asset will initially be recorded at the
lease commencement date and will be measured at cost,
consisting of:
• the initial amount of the lease liability, adjusted for any lease
payments made at or before the commencement date; plus

• any initial direct costs incurred; and
• an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying

asset or restore the site on which it is located; less

• any lease incentives received.

The right-of-use asset will typically be depreciated on a straight-line
basis over the lease term, unless we expect to obtain ownership of
the leased asset at the end of the lease. The lease term will consist of:
• the non-cancellable period of the lease;
• periods covered by options to extend the lease, where we are

reasonably certain to exercise the option; and

• periods covered by options to terminate the lease, where we are

reasonably certain not to exercise the option.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

81

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

We measure the success of our strategy using a number of key
performance indicators, which are outlined below. We believe
these key performance indicators allow us to appropriately
measure our performance against our operating strategy and
against the results of our peers and competitors. The following key
performance indicators are not measurements in accordance with
IFRS and should not be considered alternatives to net income or
any other measure of performance under IFRS. They include:
• subscriber counts;

• Wireless;
• Cable; and
• homes passed (Cable);
• subscriber churn (churn);
• blended average billings per user (ABPU);
• blended average revenue per user (ARPU);
• capital intensity;
• total service revenue;
• dividend payout ratios; and
• return on assets.

Commencing this year, we are disclosing blended ABPU (Wireless)
as a key performance indicator. Additionally, as a result of our
redefined Cable segment, we have amended the definition of our
subscriber count key performance indicator to include Smart
Home Monitoring subscribers as part of Internet.

SUBSCRIBER COUNTS
We determine the number of subscribers to our services based on
active subscribers. When subscribers are deactivated, either
voluntarily or involuntarily for non-payment, they are considered
deactivations in the period the services are discontinued. We use
subscriber counts to measure our core business performance and
ability to benefit from recurring revenue streams. We use homes
passed (Cable) as a measure for our potential market penetration
within a defined geographical area.

Subscriber count (Wireless)
• A wireless subscriber
telephone number.

is represented by each identifiable

• We report wireless subscribers in two categories: postpaid and
prepaid. Postpaid and prepaid include voice-only subscribers,
data-only subscribers, and subscribers with service plans
integrating both voice and data.

• Usage and overage charges for postpaid subscribers are billed a
month in arrears. Prepaid subscribers cannot incur usage and/or
overage charges in excess of their plan limits or account balance.
• Wireless prepaid subscribers are considered active for a period
of 180 days from the date of their last revenue-generating usage.

Subscriber count (Cable)
• Cable Television and Internet subscribers are represented by a
dwelling unit; Cable Phone subscribers are represented by line
counts.

• When there is more than one unit in a single dwelling, such as an
apartment building, each tenant with cable service is counted as
the service is invoiced
an individual subscriber, whether
separately or included in the tenant’s rent.
Institutional units,
such as hospitals or hotels, are each considered one subscriber.

• Cable Television, Internet, and Phone subscribers include only
those subscribers who have service installed and operating, and
who are being billed accordingly.

• Subscriber counts exclude certain enterprise services delivered
over our fibre network and data centre infrastructure, and circuit-
switched local and long distance voice services and legacy data
services where access is delivered using leased third-party
network elements and tariffed ILEC services.

Homes passed (Cable)
Homes passed are represented by the total number of addresses
that either are Cable subscribers or are non-subscribers, but have
the ability to access our cable services, within a defined
geographical area. When there is more than one unit in a single
dwelling, such as an apartment building, each unit that is a Cable
subscriber, or has the ability to access our cable services, is counted
as an individual home passed. Institutional or commercial units,
such as hospitals or hotels, are each considered one home passed.

SUBSCRIBER CHURN
Subscriber churn (churn) is a measure of the number of subscribers
that deactivated during a period as a percentage of the total
subscriber base, usually calculated on a monthly basis. Subscriber
churn measures our success in retaining our subscribers. We
calculate it by dividing the number of Wireless subscribers that
deactivated (usually in a month) by the aggregate numbers of
subscribers at the beginning of the period. When used or reported
for a period greater than one month, subscriber churn represents
the sum of the number of subscribers deactivating for each period
divided by the sum of the aggregate number of subscribers at the
beginning of each period.

BLENDED AVERAGE BILLINGS PER USER (WIRELESS)
To assist
in understanding the underlying economics of our
Wireless business, we commenced disclosing blended ABPU this
year. We use blended ABPU as a measure that approximates the
average amount we invoice an individual subscriber on a monthly
basis. This measure is similar to blended ARPU under previously
issued results prior to the adoption of IFRS 15 (see “Accounting
Policies”); however, as a result of the reduction in service revenue
under IFRS 15, blended ARPU is lower than previously reported
and does not fully reflect the average amount to be paid by a
customer each month. Blended ABPU helps us identify trends and
measure our success in attracting and retaining higher-value
subscribers. We calculate blended ABPU by dividing the sum of
service revenue and the amortization of contract assets to accounts
receivable by the average total number of Wireless subscribers for
the same period.

BLENDED AVERAGE REVENUE PER USER (WIRELESS)
Blended ARPU helps us identify trends and measure our success in
attracting and retaining higher-value subscribers. We calculate
blended ARPU by dividing service revenue by the average total
number of Wireless subscribers for the same period.

CAPITAL INTENSITY
Capital
intensity allows us to compare the level of our capital
expenditures to that of other companies within the same industry.
Our capital expenditures do not include expenditures on spectrum

82

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

intensity by dividing capital
licences. We calculate capital
expenditures by revenue. We use it to evaluate the performance of
our assets and when making decisions about capital expenditures.
We believe that certain investors and analysts use capital intensity
to measure the performance of asset purchases and construction in
relation to revenue.

DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIOS
We calculate the dividend payout ratio by dividing dividends
declared for the year by net income or free cash flow for the year.
We use dividends as a percentage of net income and free cash
flow to conduct analysis and assist with determining the dividends
we should pay.

TOTAL SERVICE REVENUE
We use total service revenue to measure our core business
performance from the provision of services to our customers
separate from revenue generated from the sale of equipment we
have acquired from device manufacturers and resold. Included in
this metric is our retail revenue from TSC and the Toronto Blue Jays,
which are also core to our business. We calculate total service
revenue by subtracting equipment revenue from total revenue.

RETURN ON ASSETS
We use return on assets to measure our efficiency in using our
assets to generate net income. We calculate return on assets by
dividing net income for the year by total assets as at year-end.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

83

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

NON-GAAP MEASURES
We use the following non-GAAP measures. These are reviewed regularly by management and the Board in assessing our performance
and making decisions regarding the ongoing operations of our business and its ability to generate cash flows. Some or all of these
measures may also be used by investors, lending institutions, and credit rating agencies as indicators of our operating performance, of our
ability to incur and service debt, and as measurements to value companies in the telecommunications sector. These are not recognized
measures under GAAP and do not have standard meanings under IFRS, so may not be reliable ways to compare us to other companies.

Non-GAAP measure Why we use it

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA
margin

• To evaluate the performance of our businesses, and when making
decisions about the ongoing operations of the business and our
ability to generate cash flows.

• We believe that certain investors and analysts use adjusted EBITDA to
measure our ability to service debt and to meet other payment
obligations.

• We also use it as one component in determining short-term incentive

compensation for all management employees.

Adjusted net income

Adjusted basic and
diluted earnings per
share

• To assess the performance of our businesses before the effects of the
noted items, because they affect the comparability of our financial
results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business
performance. Excluding these items does not imply that they are
non-recurring.

Free cash flow 1

• To show how much cash we have available to repay debt and reinvest
in our company, which is an important indicator of our financial
strength and performance.

• We believe that some investors and analysts use free cash flow to

value a business and its underlying assets.

Adjusted net debt

• To conduct valuation-related analysis and make decisions about

capital structure.

• We believe this helps investors and analysts analyze our enterprise

and equity value and assess our leverage.

Debt leverage ratio

• To conduct valuation-related analysis and make decisions about

capital structure.

• We believe this helps investors and analysts analyze our enterprise

and equity value and assess our leverage.

Most
comparable
IFRS financial
measure

Net income

Net income

Basic and diluted
earnings per share

Cash provided by
operating activities

Long-term debt

Long-term debt
divided by net income

How we calculate it

Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income
add (deduct)
income tax expense (recovery);
finance costs; depreciation and
amortization; other expense
(income); restructuring, acquisition
and other; and loss (gain) on
disposition of property, plant and
equipment.

Adjusted EBITDA margin:
Adjusted EBITDA
divided by
revenue.

Adjusted net income:
Net income
add (deduct)
restructuring, acquisition and other;
loss (recovery) on sale or wind down
of investments; loss (gain) on
disposition of property, plant and
equipment; (gain) on acquisitions;
loss on non-controlling interest
purchase obligations; loss on
repayment of long-term debt; loss
on bond forward derivatives; and
income tax adjustments on these
items, including adjustments as a
result of legislative changes.

Adjusted basic and diluted earnings
per share:
Adjusted net income and adjusted
net income including the dilutive
effect of stock-based compensation
divided by
basic and diluted weighted average
shares outstanding.

Adjusted EBITDA
deduct
capital expenditures; interest on
borrowings net of capitalized
interest; net change in contract
asset and deferred commission cost
asset balances; and cash income
taxes.

Total long-term debt
add (deduct)
current portion of long-term debt;
deferred transaction costs and
discounts; net debt derivative
(assets) liabilities; credit risk
adjustment related to net debt
derivatives; bank advances (cash
and cash equivalents); and short-
term borrowings.

Adjusted net debt (defined above)
divided by
12-month trailing adjusted EBITDA
(defined above).

1 Effective January 1, 2019, we will redefine free cash flow such that we will no longer adjust for the “net change in contract asset and deferred commission cost asset balances”. We

will redefine free cash flow to simplify this measure and we believe removing it will make us more comparable within our industry.

84

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA AND ADJUSTED
EBITDA MARGIN

(In millions of dollars)

Net income
Add (deduct):

Income tax expense
Other income
Finance costs
Restructuring, acquisition and other
Gain on disposition of property, plant and

equipment

Depreciation and amortization

Adjusted EBITDA

Years ended December 31

2018

2,059

758
(32)
793
210

(16)
2,211

5,983

2017
(restated) 1

1,845

685
(19)
746
152

(49)
2,142

5,502

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars, except per share amounts;
number of shares outstanding in millions)

2017
(restated) 1

2018

Adjusted basic earnings per share:

Adjusted net income
Divided by: weighted average number of

2,241

1,902

shares outstanding

515

515

Adjusted basic earnings per share

$ 4.35

$ 3.69

Adjusted diluted earnings per share:

Adjusted net income
Effect on net income of dilutive securities

Diluted adjusted net income
Divided by: diluted weighted average number

2,241
(2)

2,239

1,902
–

1,902

of shares outstanding

516

517

Adjusted diluted earnings per share

$ 4.34

$ 3.68

Years ended December 31

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

(In millions of dollars, except percentages)

Adjusted EBITDA margin:
Adjusted EBITDA
Divided by: total revenue

Adjusted EBITDA margin

2017
(restated) 1

2018

5,983
15,096

5,502
14,369

39.6%

38.3%

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME

(In millions of dollars)

Net income
Add (deduct):

Years ended December 31

2018

2,059

2017
(restated) 1

1,845

Restructuring, acquisition and other
Loss on bond forward derivatives
Loss on repayment of long-term debt
Recovery on wind-down of shomi
Gain on disposition of property, plant and

equipment

Income tax impact of above items
Income tax adjustment, legislative tax change

210
21
28
–

(16)
(61)
–

152
–
–
(20)

(49)
(28)
2

Adjusted net income

2,241

1,902

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

Policies”.

RECONCILIATION OF FREE CASH FLOW

(In millions of dollars)

Cash provided by operating activities
Add (deduct):

Capital expenditures
Interest on borrowings, net of capitalized

interest

Restructuring, acquisition and other
Interest paid
Program rights amortization
Change in non-cash operating working

capital items
Other adjustments

Free cash flow

Net change in contract asset and deferred

commission cost asset balances 1

Free cash flow (with respect to “2019 Outlook”)

Years ended December 31

2018

4,288

2017

3,938

(2,790)

(2,436)

(689)
210
726
(58)

114
(30)

(722)
152
735
(64)

164
(82)

1,771

1,685

363

2,134

184

1,869

1 Includes “net change in contract asset balances” and the net change in deferred
commission cost asset balances in “other” in operating activities on the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.

RECONCILIATION OF DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO OF FREE
CASH FLOW

(In millions of dollars, except percentages)

Dividends declared during the year
Divided by: free cash flow

Dividend payout ratio of free cash flow

Years ended December 31

2018

988
1,771

56%

2017

988
1,685

59%

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

85

 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET DEBT AND DEBT
LEVERAGE RATIO

As at December 31

(In millions of dollars, except ratios)

(In millions of dollars)

Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt
Deferred transaction costs and discounts

Add (deduct):

Net debt derivative assets
Credit risk adjustment related to net debt

derivative assets
Short-term borrowings
(Cash and cash equivalents) bank advances

Adjusted net debt

(1,373)

(1,129)

Policies”.

(75)
2,255
(405)

(17)
1,585
6

14,806

15,000

2018

900
13,390
114

14,404

2017

1,756
12,692
107

14,555

Debt leverage ratio

Adjusted net debt
Divided by: trailing 12-month adjusted

EBITDA

Debt leverage ratio

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting

As at December 31

2018

2017
(restated) 1

14,806

15,000

5,983

2.5

5,502

2.7

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS OF LONG-TERM DEBT GUARANTOR

Our outstanding public debt, amounts drawn on our $4.2 billion bank credit and letter of credit facilities, and derivatives are unsecured
obligations of RCI, as obligor, and RCCI, as either co-obligor or guarantor, as applicable.

The selected unaudited consolidating summary financial information for RCI for the periods identified below, presented with a separate
column for: (i) RCI, (ii) RCCI, (iii) our non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis, (iv) consolidating adjustments, and (v) the total
consolidated amounts, is set forth as follows:

Years ended December 31
(unaudited)
(In millions of dollars)

Selected Statements of Income data

measure:
Revenue
Net income (loss)

As at December 31
(unaudited)
(In millions of dollars)

Selected Statements of Financial

Position data measure:
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities

RCI 1

RCCI 1

Non-guarantor
subsidiaries 1

Consolidating
adjustments 1

Total

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2017
(restated) 3

2018

11
2,059

46
1,845

13,073
1,818

12,401
1,698

2,225
348

2,167
98

(213)
(2,166)

(245) 15,096
2,059

(1,796)

14,369
1,845

RCI 1

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2018

RCCI 1,2

2017
(restated) 3

Non-guarantor
subsidiaries 1

Consolidating
adjustments 1

Total

2017
(restated) 3

2017
(restated) 3

2018

2018

2017
(restated) 3

2018

24,687
27,485
25,995
15,149

24,501
31,683
30,723
14,468

22,870
22,396
27,170
3,025

21,419
21,691
27,074
2,807

10,256
3,700
8,206
110

9,016
3,521
1,513
572

(52,925)
(26,551)
(54,535)
(1,381)

(50,811)
4,888
(30,530) 27,030
6,836
(52,427)
(1,736) 16,903

4,125
26,365
6,883
16,111

1 For the purposes of this table, investments in subsidiary companies are accounted for by the equity method.
2 Amounts recorded in current liabilities and non-current liabilities for RCCI do not include any obligations arising as a result of being a guarantor or co-obligor, as the case may be,

under any of RCI’s long-term debt.

3 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15 and fully reflect the dissolution of Rogers Communications Partnership. See “Accounting Policies”.

86

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
’

S
D

I

I

S
C
U
S
S
O
N
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S

I

S

FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS

(In millions of dollars, except per share amounts, subscriber count
results, churn, ABPU, ARPU, percentages, and ratios)

2018

2017 1

2016 2

2015 2

2014 2

As at or years ended December 31

Revenue

Wireless
Cable 3
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations 3

Total revenue
Total service revenue 4,5

Adjusted EBITDA 6
Wireless
Cable 3
Media
Corporate items and intercompany eliminations 3

Total adjusted EBITDA

Net income
Adjusted net income 6

Cash provided by operating activities
Free cash flow 6
Capital expenditures
Earnings per share

Basic
Diluted

Adjusted earnings per share 6

Basic
Diluted

Statements of Financial Position:

Assets

Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Investments
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Long-term liabilities
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Subscriber count results (in thousands) 4

Wireless subscribers
Internet subscribers
Television subscribers
Phone subscribers

Additional Wireless metrics 4

Postpaid churn (monthly)
Blended ABPU (monthly) 7
Blended ARPU (monthly)

Additional consolidated metrics

Revenue growth
Adjusted EBITDA growth
Dividends declared per share
Dividend payout ratio of net income 4
Dividend payout ratio of free cash flow 4,6
Return on assets 4
Debt leverage ratio 6

9,200
3,932
2,168
(204)

15,096
12,974

4,090
1,874
196
(177)

5,983

2,059
2,241

4,288
1,771
2,790

$ 4.00
$ 3.99

$ 4.35
$ 4.34

11,780
3,905
7,205
2,134
6,894

31,918

16,903
6,836
23,739
8,179

31,918

10,783
2,430
1,685
1,116

1.10%
$ 64.74
$ 55.64

5%
9%
$ 1.92
48.0%
55.8%
6.5%
2.5

8,569
3,894
2,153
(247)

14,369
12,550

3,726
1,819
127
(170)

5,502

1,845
1,902

3,938
1,685
2,436

$ 3.58
$ 3.57

$ 3.69
$ 3.68

11,143
3,905
7,244
2,561
5,637

30,490

16,111
6,883
22,994
7,496

30,490

10,482
2,321
1,740
1,108

1.20%
$ 62.31
$ 54.23

5%
9%
$ 1.92
53.6%
58.6%
6.1%
2.7

7,916
3,871
2,146
(231)

13,702
13,027

3,262
1,773
159
(163)

5,031

835
1,432

3,957
1,705
2,352

$
$

$
$

1.62
1.62

2.78
2.77

10,749
3,905
7,130
2,174
4,384

28,342

17,960
5,113
23,073
5,269

28,342

10,274
2,145
1,820
1,094

7,651
3,870
2,079
(186)

13,414
12,649

3,217
1,751
167
(159)

4,976

1,342
1,433

3,747
1,676
2,440

$ 2.61
$ 2.60

$ 2.78
$ 2.77

10,997
3,905
7,243
2,271
4,773

29,189

18,536
5,017
23,553
5,636

29,189

9,877
2,048
1,896
1,090

7,305
3,867
1,826
(148)

12,850

3,232
1,760
125
(135)

4,982

1,341
1,508

3,698
1,437
2,366

$ 2.60
$ 2.56

$ 2.93
$ 2.92

10,655
3,897
6,588
1,898
3,498

26,536

16,205
4,920
21,125
5,411

26,536

9,450
2,011
2,024
1,150

1.23%

1.27%

1.27%

$ 60.42

$ 59.71

$ 59.41

$

2%
1%
1.92
118.3%
57.9%
2.9%
3.0

4%
0%
$ 1.92
73.6%
58.9%
4.6%
3.1

1%
2%
$ 1.83
70.2%
65.6%
5.1%
2.9

1 2017 reported figures have been restated applying IFRS 15. See “Accounting Policies”.

2 Amounts calculated on a basis consistent with our previous revenue recognition accounting policies prior to adopting IFRS 15.

3 These figures have been retrospectively amended as a result of our reportable segment realignment. See “Understanding Our Business”.

4 As defined. See “Key Performance Indicators”.

5 Total service revenue has not been presented for periods prior to 2015. We commenced reporting total service revenue as a key performance indicator in the fourth quarter of 2016. See “Key

Performance Indicators”.

6 Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share, free cash flow, debt leverage ratio, and dividend payout ratio of free cash flow are non-GAAP measures

and should not be considered substitutes or alternatives for GAAP measures. These are not defined terms under IFRS, and do not have standard meanings, so may not be a reliable way to

compare us to other companies. See “Non-GAAP Measures” for information about these measures, including how we calculate them.

7 Blended ABPU has not been presented for periods prior to 2017. We commenced using blended ABPU as a key performance indicator in the first quarter of 2018. See “Key Performance

Indicators”.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

87

 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting
December 31, 2018

Board of Directors carries out this responsibility through its Audit
and Risk Committee.

responsibilities; and to review MD&A,

The Audit and Risk Committee meets regularly with management,
as well as the internal and external auditors, to discuss internal
controls over the financial reporting process, auditing matters, and
financial reporting issues; to satisfy itself that each party is properly
the
discharging its
consolidated financial statements, and the external auditors’ report.
The Audit and Risk Committee reports its findings to the Board of
Directors for its consideration when approving the consolidated
financial statements for issuance to the shareholders. The Audit and
Risk Committee also considers the engagement or re-appointment
of the external auditors before submitting its recommendation to
the Board of Directors for review and for shareholder approval.

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG
LLP, the external auditors, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) on
behalf of the shareholders. Our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2018 has been audited by KPMG
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
LLP,
Accountability Oversight Board (United States). KPMG LLP has full
and free access to the Audit and Risk Committee.

March 6, 2019

Joe Natale
President and Chief Executive Officer

Anthony Staffieri, FCPA, FCA
Chief Financial Officer

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Rogers
Communications Inc. and its subsidiaries and all the information in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
are the
responsibility of management and have been approved by the
Board of Directors.

(MD&A)

Management has prepared the consolidated financial statements
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The
consolidated financial statements include certain amounts that are
based on management’s best estimates and judgments and, in
respects, Rogers
their opinion, present
Communications Inc.’s financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows. Management has prepared the financial information
presented elsewhere in MD&A and has ensured that it is consistent
with the consolidated financial statements.

in all material

fairly,

Management has developed and maintains a system of internal
controls that further enhances the integrity of the consolidated
financial statements. The system of internal controls is supported by
the
and includes management
communication to employees about its policies on ethical business
conduct.

function

internal

audit

Management believes these internal controls provide reasonable
assurance that:
• transactions are properly authorized and recorded;
• financial records are reliable and form a proper basis for the

preparation of consolidated financial statements; and

• the assets of Rogers Communications Inc. and its subsidiaries are

properly accounted for and safeguarded.

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management’s
responsibility for financial reporting and is ultimately responsible for
reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements. The

88

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Rogers
Communications Inc.

Inc.

income, comprehensive income, changes

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position of Rogers Communications
as at
the related consolidated
December 31, 2018 and 2017,
in
statements of
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes
(collectively,
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Rogers Communications
Inc. as at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board.

the “consolidated financial statements”).

Inc.’s

internal control over

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB),
financial
Rogers Communications
reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the criteria established
in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway
Commission, and our report dated March 6, 2019 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Rogers Communications
Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
Rogers Communications Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect
to Rogers Communications Inc. in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit
the
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud,
and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
Rogers Communications
Inc. has changed its method of
accounting for revenue from contracts with customers and financial
instruments during 2018 due to the adoption of IFRS 15, Revenue
from Contracts with Customers and IFRS 9, Financial Instruments,
respectively, and included the presentation of the statement of
financial position as at January 1, 2017.

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
We have served as Rogers Communications Inc.’s auditor since 1969.
Toronto, Canada
March 6, 2019

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

89

 
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Rogers Communications Inc.

reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
financial
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only
in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 6, 2019

In our opinion, Rogers Communications

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Rogers Communications Inc.’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
Inc.
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
in accordance with the
Commission. We also have audited,
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial
position of Rogers Communications Inc. as at December 31, 2018
and 2017,
income,
comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash
the years in the two-year period ended
flows for each of
December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively,
the
“consolidated financial statements”), and our report dated March 6,
2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.

the related consolidated statements of

Basis for Opinion
Rogers Communications Inc.’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting,
included under the heading Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting contained
within Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended
December 31, 2018. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
Rogers Communications Inc.’s internal control over
financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent
with respect to Rogers Communications Inc. in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
internal control over financial
material respects. Our audit of

90

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In millions of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

Years ended December 31

Revenue

Operating expenses:
Operating costs
Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
Restructuring, acquisition and other

Finance costs
Other income

Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense

Net income for the year

Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Note

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

5

15,096

14,369

6
7, 8
7
9
10
11

12

9,113
2,211
(16)
210
793
(32)

2,817
758

2,059

8,867
2,142
(49)
152
746
(19)

2,530
685

1,845

13
13

$ 4.00
$ 3.99

$ 3.58
$ 3.57

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

91

 
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In millions of Canadian dollars)

Years ended December 31

Note

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

Net income for the year

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Items that will not be reclassified to net income:

Defined benefit pension plans:

Remeasurements
Related income tax (expense) recovery

Defined benefit pension plans

Equity investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI):

(Decrease) increase in fair value
Related income tax recovery (expense)

Equity investments measured at FVTOCI

Items that will not be reclassified to net income

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to net income:

Cash flow hedging derivative instruments:

Unrealized gain (loss) in fair value of derivative instruments
Reclassification to net income of (gain) loss on debt derivatives
Reclassification to net income or property, plant and equipment of (gain) loss on

expenditure derivatives

Reclassification to net income for accrued interest
Related income tax (expense) recovery

Cash flow hedging derivative instruments

Equity-accounted investments:

Share of other comprehensive income (loss) of equity-accounted investments, net of tax

Equity-accounted investments

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to net income

Other comprehensive (loss) income for the year

Comprehensive income for the year

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

22

2,059

1,845

53
(12)

41

(440)
63

(377)

(336)

725
(671)

(8)
(43)
(65)

(62)

14

14

(48)

(384)

1,675

(62)
17

(45)

433
(62)

371

326

(566)
591

39
(60)
40

44

(15)

(15)

29

355

2,200

92

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

(In millions of Canadian dollars)

As at
December 31

As at
December 31

As at
January 1

Note

2018

2017
(restated, see note 2)

2017
(restated, see note 2)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Current portion of contract assets
Other current assets
Current portion of derivative instruments

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments
Derivative instruments
Contract assets
Other long-term assets
Deferred tax assets
Goodwill

Total assets

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Current liabilities:

Bank advances
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Income tax payable
Other current liabilities
Contract liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
Current portion of derivative instruments

Total current liabilities

Provisions
Long-term debt
Derivative instruments
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity

14
15
5

16

7
8
17
16
5

12
8

18

19
5
20
16

19
20
16
21
12

23

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Guarantees
Commitments and contingent liabilities
Subsequent events

26
27
10, 16, 23

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

On behalf of the Board of Directors:

405
2,259
466
1,052
436
270

4,888

11,780
7,205
2,134
1,339
535
132
–
3,905

31,918

–
2,255
3,052
177
132
233
900
87

6,836

35
13,390
22
546
2,910

23,739
8,179

31,918

–
2,035
435
820
414
421

4,125

11,143
7,244
2,561
953
413
143
3
3,905

30,490

6
1,585
2,931
62
132
278
1,756
133

6,883

35
12,692
147
613
2,624

22,994
7,496

30,490

–
1,944
452
723
417
91

3,627

10,749
7,130
2,174
1,708
354
156
8
3,905

29,811

71
800
2,783
186
285
302
750
22

5,199

33
15,330
118
562
2,285

23,527
6,284

29,811

Edward S. Rogers
Director

John H. Clappison, FCPA, FCA
Director

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

93

 
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(In millions of Canadian dollars, except number of shares)

Class A
Voting Shares

Class B
Non-Voting Shares

Year ended December 31, 2018

Amount

(000s) Amount

Number
of shares

Number
of shares
(000s)

Retained
earnings

FVTOCI
investment
reserve

Hedging
reserve

Equity
investment
reserve

Total
shareholders’
equity

Balances, December 31, 2017 (restated, see

note 2)

Adjustments pertaining to IFRS 9 adoption

(see note 2)

72 112,407

405 402,403

6,074

1,013

–

–

–

–

(4)

Balances, January 1, 2018 (restated, see note 2)

72 112,407

405 402,403

Net income for the year

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Defined benefit pension plans, net of tax
FVTOCI investments, net of tax
Derivative instruments accounted for as

hedges, net of tax

Share of equity-accounted investments,

net of tax

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

Transactions with shareholders recorded

directly in equity:

Dividends declared
Shares issued on exercise of stock

options

Share class exchange

Total transactions with shareholders

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–
(1)

(1)

–
(1,252)

(1,252)

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–
1

1

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

2
1,252

1,254

6,070

2,059

41
–

–

–

41

2,100

(988)

–
–

(988)

(63)

–

(63)

–

–
–

(62)

–

(62)

(62)

–

–
–

–

–

1,013

–

–
(377)

–

–

(377)

(377)

–

–
–

–

(5)

–

(5)

–

–
–

–

14

14

14

–

–
–

–

9

7,496

(4)

7,492

2,059

41
(377)

(62)

14

(384)

1,675

(988)

–
–

(988)

8,179

Balances, December 31, 2018

71 111,155

406 403,657

7,182

636

(125)

Class A
Voting Shares

Class B
Non-Voting Shares

Year ended December 31, 2017

Amount

(000s) Amount

Number
of shares

Number
of shares
(000s)

Balances, January 1, 2017 (restated, see note 2)

72 112,412

405 402,396

Net income for the period (restated, see note 2)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Defined benefit pension plans, net of tax
FVTOCI investments, net of tax
Derivative instruments accounted for as

hedges, net of tax

Share of equity-accounted investments, net

of tax

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

Transactions with shareholders recorded directly

in equity:

Dividends declared
Shares issued on exercise of stock

options

Share class exchange

Total transactions with shareholders

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–
(5)

(5)

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

2
5

7

Retained
earnings

5,262

1,845

(45)
–

–

–

(45)

1,800

(988)

–
–

(988)

FVTOCI
investment
reserve

Hedging
reserve

Equity
investment
reserve

Total
shareholders’
equity

642

(107)

10

–

–
371

–

–

371

371

–

–
–

–

–

–
–

44

–

44

44

–

–
–

–

–

–
–

–

(15)

(15)

(15)

–

–
–

–

6,284

1,845

(45)
371

44

(15)

355

2,200

(988)

–
–

(988)

7,496

Balances, December 31, 2017

72 112,407

405 402,403

6,074

1,013

(63)

(5)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

94

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In millions of Canadian dollars)

Years ended December 31

Operating activities:

Net income for the year
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
Program rights amortization
Finance costs
Income tax expense
Post-employment benefits contributions, net of expense
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
Recovery on wind-down of shomi
Net change in contract asset balances
Other

Cash provided by operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital

items, income taxes paid, and interest paid

Change in non-cash operating working capital items

Cash provided by operating activities before income taxes paid and interest paid
Income taxes paid
Interest paid

Cash provided by operating activities

Investing activities:

Capital expenditures
Additions to program rights
Changes in non-cash working capital related to capital expenditures and intangible

assets

Acquisitions and other strategic transactions, net of cash acquired
Other

Cash used in investing activities

Financing activities:

Net proceeds received on short-term borrowings
Net repayment of long-term debt
Net proceeds (payments) on settlement of debt derivatives and forward contracts
Transaction costs incurred
Dividends paid

Cash used in financing activities

Change in cash and cash equivalents
Bank advances, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents (bank advances), end of year

C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Note

2018

2017
(restated, see
note 2)

2,059

1,845

7, 8
8
10
12
22
7
11
5

28

7, 28
8

8

18
20
16

23

2,211
58
793
758
(44)
(16)
–
(354)
33

5,498
(114)

5,384
(370)
(726)

4,288

(2,790)
(54)

(125)
–
25

2,142
64
746
685
4
(49)
(20)
(156)
51

5,312
(164)

5,148
(475)
(735)

3,938

(2,436)
(59)

109
(184)
(60)

(2,944)

(2,630)

508
(823)
388
(18)
(988)

(933)

411
(6)

405

858
(1,034)
(79)
–
(988)

(1,243)

65
(71)

(6)

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash and short-term deposits that have an original maturity of less than 90 days, less bank
advances.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

95

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We, us, our, Rogers, Rogers Communications, and the Company refer to Rogers Communications Inc. and its subsidiaries. RCI refers to the
legal entity Rogers Communications Inc., not including its subsidiaries. RCI also holds interests in various investments and ventures.

Page

Note

96
97
104
104
105
108
108
111
113
114
114
114
116
117
117

Nature of the Business
Note 1
Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2
Capital Risk Management
Note 3
Segmented Information
Note 4
Revenue
Note 5
Operating Costs
Note 6
Property, Plant and Equipment
Note 7
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Note 8
Restructuring, Acquisition and Other
Note 9
Note 10
Finance Costs
Note 11 Other (Income) Expense
Income Taxes
Note 12
Note 13
Earnings Per Share
Note 14 Accounts Receivable
Inventories
Note 15

NOTE 1: NATURE OF THE BUSINESS

Page

117

127
128
129
130
132
133
136
137
139
140
141
142

Note

Note 16

Financial Risk Management and Financial
Instruments
Investments
Note 17
Short-Term Borrowings
Note 18
Provisions
Note 19
Note 20
Long-Term Debt
Note 21 Other Long-Term Liabilities
Post-Employment Benefits
Note 22
Shareholders’ Equity
Note 23
Note 24
Stock-Based Compensation
Note 25 Related Party Transactions
Note 26 Guarantees
Note 27 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Note 28

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

is

Inc.

Rogers Communications
a diversified Canadian
communications and media company. Substantially all of our
operations and sales are in Canada. RCI is incorporated in Canada
and its registered office is located at 333 Bloor Street East, Toronto,
Ontario, M4W 1G9. RCI’s shares are publicly traded on the Toronto
Stock Exchange (TSX: RCI.A and RCI.B) and on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE: RCI).

We report our results of operations in three reportable segments.
Each segment and the nature of its business is as follows:

Segment

Wireless

Cable

Media

Principal activities

Wireless telecommunications operations
for Canadian consumers and businesses.

Cable telecommunications operations,
including Internet, television, telephony
(phone), and smart home monitoring
services for Canadian consumers and
businesses, and network connectivity
through our fibre network and data centre
assets to support a range of voice, data,
networking, hosting, and cloud-based
services for the enterprise, public sector,
and carrier wholesale markets.

A diversified portfolio of media properties,
including sports media and entertainment,
television and radio broadcasting,
specialty channels, multi-platform
shopping, digital media, and publishing.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, Wireless and Cable
were operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Rogers
Communications Canada Inc. (RCCI), and certain other wholly-
owned subsidiaries. Media was operated by our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Rogers Media Inc., and its subsidiaries.

96

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

See note 4 for more information about our reportable operating
segments.

in each of our

BUSINESS SEASONALITY
Our operating results generally vary from quarter to quarter as a
result of changes in general economic conditions and seasonal
fluctuations, among other
reportable
things,
segments. This means our results in one quarter are not necessarily
indicative of how we will perform in a future quarter. Wireless,
Cable, and Media each have unique seasonal aspects to, and
certain other historical trends in, their businesses. Fluctuations in
net income from quarter to quarter can also be attributed to losses
on the repayment of debt, foreign exchange gains or losses,
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, other income
and expenses, impairment of assets, and changes in income tax
expense.

Wireless
Wireless operating results are influenced by the timing of our
marketing and promotional expenditures and higher levels of
subscriber additions and related subsidies, resulting in higher
subscriber acquisition- and activation-related expenses, typically in
the third and fourth quarters. The third and fourth quarters typically
experience higher volumes of activity as a result of “back to school”
and holiday season-related consumer behaviour. Aggressive
promotional offers are often advertised during these periods. In
contrast, we typically see lower subscriber-related activity in the first
quarter of the year.

The launch of popular new wireless device models can also affect
the level of subscriber activity. Highly-anticipated device launches
typically occur in the fall season of each year. Wireless roaming
revenue is dependent on customer travel volumes and timing, and
is also impacted by the foreign exchange rates and general
economic conditions.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Cable
Cable’s operating results are affected by modest seasonal
fluctuations, typically caused by:
• university and college students who live in residences moving
out early in the second quarter and canceling their service as well
as students moving in late in the third quarter and signing up for
cable service;

advertising revenue and additional revenue from game day
ticket sales and merchandise sales, if and when the Toronto
Blue Jays play in the postseason; and

• programming and production costs and player payroll are
expensed based on the number of games aired or played, as
applicable; and

• the National Hockey League (NHL) season, where:

• individuals

temporarily
vacations or seasonal relocations; and

suspending service for extended

• the concentrated marketing we generally conduct in our fourth

quarter.

Cable results from our enterprise customers do not generally have
any unique seasonal aspects.

Media
Seasonal fluctuations relate to:
• periods of increased consumer activity and their impact on
advertising and related retail cycles, which tend to be most active
in the fourth quarter due to holiday spending and slower in the
first quarter;

• the Major League Baseball season, where:

• games played are concentrated in the spring, summer, and
fall months (generally the second and third quarters of the
year);

• revenue related to game day ticket sales, merchandise sales,
and advertising are concentrated in the spring, summer, and
fall months (generally the second and third quarters of the
year), with postseason games commanding a premium in

NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. Our
functional currency is the Canadian dollar. We prepare the
consolidated financial statements on a historical cost basis, except
for:
• certain financial instruments as disclosed in note 16, which are

measured at fair value;

• the net deferred pension liability, which is measured as

described in note 22; and

• liabilities for stock-based compensation, which are measured at

fair value as disclosed in note 24.

(b) BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
Subsidiaries are entities we control. We include the financial
statements of our subsidiaries in our consolidated financial
statements from the date we gain control of them until our control
ceases. We eliminate all intercompany transactions and balances
between our subsidiaries on consolidation.

(c) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
We translate amounts denominated in foreign currencies into
Canadian dollars as follows:
• monetary assets and liabilities - at the exchange rate in effect as
at the date of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position;
• non-monetary assets and liabilities, and related depreciation and

amortization – at the historical exchange rates; and

• regular season games are concentrated in the fall and winter
months (generally the first and fourth quarters of the year) and
playoff games are concentrated in the spring months
(generally the second quarter of the year). We expect a
correlation between the quality of revenue and earnings and
the extent of Canadian teams’ presence during the playoffs;
• programming and production costs are expensed based on
the timing of when the rights are aired or are expected to be
consumed; and

• advertising revenue and programming expenses

are
concentrated in the fall, winter, and spring months, with
playoff games commanding a premium in advertising
revenue.

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
We prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The Board of
Directors (the Board) authorized these consolidated financial
statements for issue on March 6, 2019.

• revenue and expenses other than depreciation and amortization
– at the average rate for the month in which the transaction was
recognized.

(d) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
We account
for business combinations using the acquisition
method of accounting. Only acquisitions that result in our gaining
control over the acquired businesses are accounted for as business
combinations. We possess control over an entity when we
conclude we are exposed to variable returns from our involvement
with the acquired entity and we have the ability to affect those
returns through our power over the acquired entity.

We calculate the fair value of the consideration paid as the sum of
the fair value at the date of acquisition of the assets we transferred
and the equity interests we issued, less the liabilities we assumed to
acquire the subsidiary.

We measure goodwill as the fair value of
the consideration
transferred less the net recognized amount of the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which are generally
measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. When the excess
is negative, a gain on acquisition is recognized immediately in net
income.

We expense the transaction costs associated with acquisitions as
we incur them.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

97

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(e) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED IN
2018
We adopted new amendments to the following accounting
standards effective for our
interim and annual consolidated
financial statements commencing January 1, 2018. These changes
did not have a material impact on our financial results.
• Amendments to IFRS 2, Share-based payment, providing
guidance on accounting for vesting and non-vesting conditions
in regards to share-based compensation.

• IFRIC 22,

Foreign

currency

transaction and advanced
consideration, clarifying the requirements in determining the
date of transactions and which foreign exchange rate to use in
when translating assets, expenses, or
income on initial
recognition.

Additionally, we adopted IFRS 15, Revenue from contracts with
instruments (IFRS 9)
customers (IFRS 15) and IFRS 9, Financial
effective January 1, 2018.
these two new
pronouncements have on our results and operations are described
below.

The effects

IFRS 15, REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
IFRS 15 supersedes previous accounting standards for revenue,
including IAS 18, Revenue (IAS 18) and IFRIC 13, Customer loyalty
programmes (IFRIC 13).

IFRS 15 introduced a single model for recognizing revenue from
contracts with customers. This standard applies to all contracts with
customers, with only some exceptions, including certain contracts
accounted for under other IFRSs. The standard requires revenue to
be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of promised
goods or services to a customer and at an amount that reflects the
consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring
those goods or services. This is achieved by applying the following
five steps:
1.
2.
3. determine the transaction price;
4.

identify the contract with a customer;
identify the performance obligations in the contract;

allocate the transaction price to the performance
obligations in the contract; and
recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a
performance obligation.

5.

IFRS 15 also provides guidance relating to the treatment of contract
acquisition and contract fulfillment costs.

The application of this new standard has significant impacts on our
reported Wireless results, specifically with regards to the timing of
recognition and classification of revenue, and the treatment of
costs incurred in acquiring customer contracts. The timing of
recognition and classification of revenue is affected because, at
contract
total
consideration over the contract term and the allocation of that
consideration to all performance obligations in the contract based
on their relative stand-alone selling prices. This affects our Wireless
arrangements that bundle equipment and service together into
monthly service fees, which results in an increase to equipment
revenue recognized at contract inception and a decrease to service

IFRS 15 requires the estimation of

inception,

98

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

revenue recognized over
the contracts. The
IFRS 15 does not affect our cash flows from
application of
operations or the methods and underlying economics through
which we transact with our customers.

the course of

The treatment of costs incurred in acquiring customer contracts is
affected as IFRS 15 requires certain contract acquisition costs (such
as sales commissions) to be recognized as an asset and amortized
into operating expenses over time. Previously, such costs were
expensed as incurred.

In addition, new assets and liabilities have been recognized on our
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Specifically, a
contract asset and contract liability is recognized to account for any
timing differences between the revenue recognized and the
amounts billed to the customer.

Significant judgment is needed to determine whether a promise to
deliver goods or services is considered distinct and in determining
the costs that are incremental to obtaining a contract with a
customer.

We have made a policy choice to adopt
IFRS 15 with full
retrospective application, subject to certain practical expedients. As
a result, all comparative information in these financial statements
has been prepared as if IFRS 15 had been in effect since January 1,
2017. The accounting policies set out in note 5 have been applied
in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2018,
the comparative information
presented in these consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2017, and for the opening Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position as at January 1, 2017. In preparing
our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at January 1,
2017 and December 31, 2017, we have adjusted amounts
previously reported in financial statements prepared in accordance
with previous IFRS on revenue recognition, including IAS 18 and
IFRIC 13.

Upon adoption of, and transition to, IFRS 15, we elected to utilize
the following practical expedients, allowing us to:
• recognize the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an
expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets
that we would have otherwise recognized would have been one
year or less;

• not disclose, on an annual basis, the unsatisfied portions of
performance obligations related to contracts with a duration of
one year or less or where the revenue we recognize corresponds
with the amount invoiced to the customer;

• not disclose the amount of the transaction price relating to
unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations for
reporting periods before January 1, 2018 (the date of initial
application) and when we expect to recognize that amount as
revenue; and

• not adjust the total consideration over the contract term for
effects of a significant financing component, if we expect that the
period between when we would transfer our good or service to
the customer and when the customer would pay for the good or
service would be one year or less.

Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017
Below is the effect of transition to IFRS 15 on our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2017, all of which
pertain to our Wireless segment.

(In millions of dollars, except per share amounts)

Reference

reported Adjustments

Restated

Revenue

i, iii

14,143

226

14,369

Year ended December 31, 2017

As previously

Operating expenses:
Operating costs
Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
Restructuring, acquisition and other

Finance costs
Other expense (income)

Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense

Net income for the period

Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

ii, iii

8,825
2,142
(49)
152
746
(19)

2,346
635

1,711

42
–
–
–
–
–

184
50

134

8,867
2,142
(49)
152
746
(19)

2,530
685

1,845

$ 3.32
$ 3.31

$ 0.26
$ 0.26

$ 3.58
$ 3.57

Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017
Below is the effect of transition to IFRS 15 on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at January 1, 2017 and December 31,
2017.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

(In millions of dollars)

Assets
Current assets:

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Current portion of contract assets
Other current assets
Current portion of derivative instruments

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments
Derivative instruments
Contract assets
Other long-term assets
Deferred tax assets
Goodwill

Total assets

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:

Bank advances
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Income tax payable
Other current liabilities 1
Contract liabilities 2
Current portion of long-term debt
Current portion of derivative instruments

Total current liabilities

Provisions
Long-term debt
Derivative instruments
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

1

2

Previously reported as “current portion of provisions”.
Previously reported as “unearned revenue”.

Reference

As previously
reported

Adjustments

Restated

As previously
reported

Adjustments

Restated

As at January 1, 2017

As at December 31, 2017

iii
i
ii

i
ii

iii
i

1,949
315
–
215
91

2,570

10,749
7,130
2,174
1,708
–
98
8
3,905

28,342

71
800
2,783
186
134
367
750
22

5,113

33
15,330
118
562
1,917

23,073

5,269

28,342

(5)
137
723
202
–

1,057

–
–
–
–
354
58
–
–

1,944
452
723
417
91

3,627

10,749
7,130
2,174
1,708
354
156
8
3,905

1,469

29,811

–
–
–
–
151
(65)
–
–

86

–
–
–
–
368

454

1,015

1,469

71
800
2,783
186
285
302
750
22

5,199

33
15,330
118
562
2,285

23,527

6,284

29,811

2,041
313
–
197
421

2,972

11,143
7,244
2,561
953
–
82
3
3,905

28,863

6
1,585
2,931
62
4
346
1,756
133

6,823

35
12,692
147
613
2,206

22,516

6,347

28,863

(6)
122
820
217
–

1,153

–
–
–
–
413
61
–
–

2,035
435
820
414
421

4,125

11,143
7,244
2,561
953
413
143
3
3,905

1,627

30,490

–
–
–
–
128
(68)
–
–

60

–
–
–
–
418

478

1,149

1,627

6
1,585
2,931
62
132
278
1,756
133

6,883

35
12,692
147
613
2,624

22,994

7,496

30,490

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

99

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The application of IFRS 15 did not affect our cash flow totals from
operating, investing, or financing activities.

i) Contract assets and liabilities
Contract assets arise primarily as a result of the difference between
revenue recognized on the sale of a wireless device at the onset of
a term contract and the cash collected at the point of sale. Revenue
recognized at point of sale requires the estimation of
total
consideration over the contract term and the allocation of that
consideration to all performance obligations in the contract based
on their relative stand-alone selling prices. For Wireless term
contracts, revenue is recognized earlier than previously reported,
with a larger allocation to equipment revenue. Prior to the adoption
of IFRS 15, the amount allocated to equipment revenue was limited
to the non-contingent consideration received at the point of sale
when recovery of the remaining consideration in the contract was
contingent upon the delivery of future services.

We record a contract liability when we receive payment from a
customer in advance of providing goods and services. We account
for contract assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis,
with each contract being presented as a single net contract asset or
net contract liability accordingly.

All contract assets are recorded net of an allowance for expected
credit losses, measured in accordance with IFRS 9.

ii) Deferred commission cost assets
Under IFRS 15, we defer incremental commission costs paid to
internal and external representatives as a result of obtaining
contracts with customers as deferred commission cost assets and
amortize them to operating expenses over the pattern of the
transfer of goods and services to the customer, which is typically
evenly over either 12 or 24 consecutive months.

iii) Inventories and other current liabilities
Under IFRS 15, we determine when the customer obtains control of
the distinct good or service. For affected transactions, we have
defined our customer as the end subscriber and determined that
they obtain control when they receive possession of a wireless
device, which typically occurs upon activation. For certain
transactions through third-party dealers and other retailers, the
timing of when the customer obtains control of a wireless device
will be deferred in comparison to our previous policy, where
revenue was recognized when the wireless device was delivered
and accepted by the independent dealer. This results in a greater
inventory balance and a corresponding increase in other current
liabilities.

IFRS 9, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In July 2014, the IASB issued the final publication of the IFRS 9
standard, which supersedes
Instruments:
recognition and measurement (IAS 39). IFRS 9 includes revised
financial
guidance on the classification and measurement of

IAS 39, Financial

100

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

instruments, new guidance for measuring impairment on financial
assets, and new hedge accounting guidance. We have adopted
IFRS 9 on a retrospective basis; however, our 2017 comparatives
were not restated because it was not possible to do so without the
use of hindsight.

Under IFRS 9, financial assets are classified and measured based on
the business model in which they are held and the characteristics of
IFRS 9 contains three primary
their contractual cash flows.
measurement categories
financial assets: measured at
for
amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income
(FVTOCI), and fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL). Under IFRS
9, we have irrevocably elected to present subsequent changes in
the fair value of our equity investments that are neither held-for-
trading nor contingent consideration arising from a business
combination
no
reclassification of net gains and losses to net income. For these
equity investments, any impairment on the instrument will be
recorded in other comprehensive income, and cumulative gains or
losses in other comprehensive income will not be reclassified into
net income, including upon disposal.

comprehensive

income with

other

in

As a result, our previous “available-for-sale financial asset reserve”
will now be referred to as the “FVTOCI investment reserve”. This
reserve represents the accumulated change in fair value of our
equity investments that are measured at FVTOCI less accumulated
impairment losses related to the investments and accumulated
amounts reclassified into retained earnings when gains and losses
are realized upon derecognition of the related investments.

Under IFRS 9, the loss allowance for trade receivables must be
calculated using the expected lifetime credit loss and recorded at
the time of initial recognition. A portion of our trade receivables
required an incremental loss allowance in order to comply with the
requirements of IFRS 9; as a result, we recognized a $4 million
decrease to accounts receivable and a corresponding decrease to
retained earnings within shareholders’ equity effective January 1,
2018. In addition, the expected loss allowance using the lifetime
credit loss approach is applied to contract assets under IFRS 15.
There is no significant effect on the carrying value of our other
financial instruments under IFRS 9 related to this new requirement.

the requirement

The new hedge accounting guidance aligns hedge accounting
more closely with an entity’s risk management objectives and
IFRS 9 does not fundamentally change the types of
strategies.
to measure and
hedging relationships or
it allows more hedging
recognize ineffectiveness; however,
to qualify for hedge
strategies used for
accounting and introduces more judgment
the
effectiveness of a hedging relationship, primarily from a qualitative
standpoint. This is not expected to have an effect on our reported
results and will simplify our application of effectiveness tests going
forward.

risk management

to assess

Below is a summary showing the classification and measurement bases of our financial instruments as at January 1, 2018 as a result of
adopting IFRS 9 (along with a comparison to IAS 39).

Financial instrument

Financial assets

IAS 39

IFRS 9

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Investments

Loans and receivables (amortized cost)
Loans and receivables (amortized cost)
Available-for-sale (FVTOCI) 1

Amortized cost
Amortized cost
FVTOCI with no reclassification to net income

Financial liabilities
Bank advances
Short-term borrowings 2
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Long-term debt 2

Derivatives 3

Debt derivatives 4

Bond forwards

Expenditure derivatives

Equity derivatives 5

Other financial liabilities (amortized cost)
Other financial liabilities (amortized cost)
Other financial liabilities (amortized cost)
Other financial liabilities (amortized cost)
Other financial liabilities (amortized cost)

Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost

Held-for-trading (FVTOCI where subject
to hedge accounting and FVTPL)
Held-for-trading (FVTOCI under hedge
accounting)
Held-for-trading (FVTOCI under hedge
accounting)
Held-for-trading (FVTPL)

FVTOCI and FVTPL

FVTOCI

FVTOCI
FVTPL

1 Subsequently measured at fair value with changes recognized in other comprehensive income. The net change subsequent to initial recognition, in the case of investments, is

reclassified into net income upon disposal of the investment or when the investment becomes impaired.

2 Subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
3 Derivatives can be in an asset or liability position at a point in time historically or in the future. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, the effective

portion of the hedge is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion of the hedge is recognized immediately into net income.

4 Debt derivatives related to our senior notes and debentures have been designated as hedges for accounting purposes and will be classified as FVTOCI. Debt derivatives related

to our credit facility and commercial paper borrowings have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes and will be classified as FVTPL.

5 Subsequent changes are offset against stock-based compensation expense or recovery in operating costs.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

• information about judgments made in applying accounting
policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts
recognized in the consolidated financial statements; and

• information on our significant accounting policies.

our

financial

preparing

consolidated

(f) ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES,
ESTIMATES, AND JUDGMENTS
When
statements,
management makes judgments, estimates, and assumptions that
affect how accounting policies are applied and the amounts we
report as assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Our significant
accounting policies, estimates, and judgments are identified in this
note or disclosed throughout the notes as identified in the table
below:
• information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that
have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the
amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements;

Note

Topic

Page Accounting Policy Use of Estimates Use of Judgments

4
5
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
22
24
27

Reportable Segments
Revenue Recognition
Property, Plant and Equipment
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Income Taxes
Earnings Per Share
Accounts Receivable
Inventories
Financial Instruments
Investments
Provisions
Post-Employment Benefits
Stock-Based Compensation
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

104
105
108
111
114
116
117
117
117
127
129
133
137
141

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X

X

X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X

X

X

X

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

101

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(g) RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET
ADOPTED
IFRS 16, LEASES (IFRS 16)
Effective January 1, 2019, we will adopt IFRS 16. Our first quarter
financial
2019 interim financial statements will be our
statements issued in accordance with IFRS 16. IFRS 16 supersedes
the current accounting standards for leases,
including IAS 17,
Leases (IAS 17) and IFRIC 4, Determining whether an arrangement
contains a lease (IFRIC 4).

first

IFRS 16 introduces a single accounting model for lessees unless
the underlying asset is of low value. A lessee will be required to
recognize, on its statement of financial position, a right-of-use asset,
representing its right to use the underlying leased asset, and a
lease liability, representing its obligation to make lease payments.
As a result of adopting IFRS 16, we will recognize a significant
increase to both assets and liabilities on our Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position, as well as a decrease to operating
costs (for the removal of rent expense for leases), an increase to
depreciation and amortization (due to depreciation of the right-of-
use asset), and an increase to finance costs (due to accretion of the
lease liability). The accounting treatment for lessors will remain
largely the same as under IAS 17.

IFRS 16 with the cumulative effect of

initial
We will adopt
application recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings
within shareholders’ equity on January 1, 2019. We will not restate
comparatives for 2018. At transition, we will apply the practical
expedient available to us as lessee that allows us to apply this
standard to contracts that were previously identified as leases
under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. Conversely, we will not apply this
standard to contracts that were previously not identified as leases
under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4.

transition will be measured at an amount equal

For leases that were classified as operating leases under IAS 17,
lease liabilities at transition will be measured at the present value of
remaining lease payments, discounted at the related incremental
borrowing rate as at January 1, 2019. Generally, right-of-use assets
to the
at
corresponding lease liabilities, adjusted for any prepaid or accrued
rent outstanding. For certain leases where we have readily available
information, we will elect to measure the right-of-use assets at their
carrying amounts as if IFRS 16 had been applied since the lease
commencement date using the related incremental borrowing rate
for the remaining lease period as at January 1, 2019.

When applying IFRS 16 to leases previously classified as operating
leases, the following practical expedients are available to us. We
will:
• apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with similar

characteristics;

• exclude initial direct costs from measuring the right-of-use asset

as at January 1, 2019; and

• use hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract

contains purchase, extension, or termination options.

We have elected to not separate fixed non-lease components from
lease components and instead account for each lease component
and associated fixed non-lease components as a single lease
component. We do not intend to elect the recognition exemptions
on short-term leases or low-value leases; however, we may choose
to elect the recognition exemptions on a class-by-class basis for
new classes, and lease-by-lease basis, respectively, in the future.

We do not expect significant impacts for contracts in which we are
the lessor.

We have a team engaged to ensuring our compliance with IFRS 16,
including overseeing the implementation of a new lease system
that enables us to comply with the requirements of the standard on
a contract-by-contract basis. This team has been responsible for
determining and implementing additional process requirements,
ensuring our data collection is appropriate, system testing,
developing related internal controls, and communicating the
upcoming changes with various stakeholders. We had detailed
data validation processes that operated throughout the course of
2018.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS TO BE APPLIED
ON ADOPTION OF IFRS 16
ESTIMATES
We will need to estimate the lease term by considering the facts
and circumstances that can create an economic incentive to
exercise an extension option, or not exercise a termination option.
We will make certain qualitative and quantitative assumptions when
deriving the value of the economic incentive.

JUDGMENTS
We will make judgments in determining whether a contract
contains an identified asset. The identified asset should be
physically distinct or represent substantially all of the capacity of the
asset, and should provide us with the right to substantially all of the
economic benefits from the use of the asset.

We will also make judgments in determining whether we have the
right to control the use of the identified asset. We have that right
when we have the decision-making rights that are most relevant to
changing how and for what purpose the asset is used. In rare cases
where the decisions about how and for what purpose the asset is
used are predetermined, we have the right to direct the use of the
asset if we either have the right to operate the asset or the asset has
been designed in a way that predetermines how and for what
purpose the asset will be used.

We will make judgments in determining the discount rate used to
measure each of our lease liabilities. The discount rate applied
should reflect the interest that we would have to pay to borrow a
similar amount at a similar term and with a similar security.

102

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

EFFECT OF TRANSITION TO IFRS 16
Below is the estimated effect of transition to IFRS 16 on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at January 1, 2019.

(In billions of dollars)

Assets

Current assets:

Other current assets
Remainder of current assets

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment
Remainder of long-term assets

Total assets

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Current portion of lease liabilities
Remainder of current liabilities

Total current liabilities

Lease liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Remainder of long-term liabilities

Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

Reference

As reported as at
December 31, 2018

Estimated effect of
IFRS 16 transition

Subsequent to
transition as at
January 1, 2019

i

i

i

0.4
4.5

4.9

11.8
15.2

31.9

3.1
–
3.7

6.8

–
2.9
14.0

23.7

8.2

31.9

***
—

***

1.5
–

1.5

(0.1)
0.2
–

0.1

1.4
***
–

1.5

***

1.5

0.4
4.5

4.9

13.3
15.2

33.4

3.0
0.2
3.7

6.9

1.4
2.9
14.0

25.2

8.2

33.4

*** Amounts less than $0.1 billion; these amounts have been excluded from subtotals.

i) Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities
We will record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease
commencement date. The lease liability will initially be measured at
the present value of lease payments that remain to be paid at the
commencement date.
included in the
Lease payments
measurement of the lease liability will include:
• fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;
• variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate;
• amounts expected to be payable under a residual value

guarantee; and

• the exercise price under a purchase option that we are
reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional
renewal period if we are reasonably certain to exercise an
extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease
unless we are reasonably certain not to terminate early.

Upon transition, except
for those leases where we have the
information to measure the right-of-use assets at their carrying
amounts as if
IFRS 16 had been applied since the lease
commencement date, as discussed above, the right-of-use asset
will be measured at the amount of the lease liability, adjusted by
the amount of any prepaid or accrued lease payments relating to

that lease recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position immediately before the date of initial application.

After transition, the right-of-use asset will initially be measured at
cost, consisting of:
• the initial amount of the lease liability, adjusted for any lease
payments made at or before the commencement date; plus

• any initial direct costs incurred; and
• an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying

asset or restore the site on which it is located; less

• any lease incentives received.

The right-of-use asset will typically be depreciated on a straight-line
basis over the lease term, unless we expect to obtain ownership of
the leased asset at the end of the lease. The lease term will consist
of:
• the non-cancellable period of the lease;
• periods covered by options to extend the lease, where we are

reasonably certain to exercise the option; and

• periods covered by options to terminate the lease, where we are

reasonably certain not to exercise the option.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

103

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3: CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Our objectives in managing capital are to ensure we have sufficient
liquidity to meet all of our commitments and to execute our
business plan. We define capital that we manage as shareholders’
equity and indebtedness (including current portion of our long-
term debt, long-term debt, and short-term borrowings).

We manage our capital structure, commitments, and maturities
and make adjustments based on general economic conditions,
financial markets, operating risks, our investment priorities, and
working capital requirements. To maintain or adjust our capital
structure, we may, with approval from the Board, issue or repay
debt and/or short-term borrowings, issue or repurchase shares, pay
dividends, or undertake other activities as deemed appropriate
under the circumstances. The Board reviews and approves the
annual capital and operating budgets, as well as any material
transactions that are not part of the ordinary course of business,
including proposals for acquisitions or other major
financing
transactions, investments, or divestitures.

We monitor debt leverage ratios as part of the management of
liquidity and shareholders’ return to sustain future development of

NOTE 4: SEGMENTED INFORMATION

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Reportable segments
We determine our reportable segments based on, among other
things, how our chief operating decision maker, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of RCI, regularly review our
operations and performance. Effective January 1, 2018, they review
adjusted EBITDA as the key measure of profit for the purpose of
assessing performance of each segment and to make decisions
about the allocation of resources, as they believe adjusted EBITDA
more fully reflects segment and consolidated profitability. Adjusted
EBITDA is defined as income before depreciation and amortization;
loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment;
(gain)
restructuring, acquisition and other; finance costs; other expense
(income); and income tax expense. Previously, our chief operating
decision maker reviewed adjusted operating profit as the key
measure of profit. The difference between adjusted operating
profit and adjusted EBITDA is that adjusted EBITDA includes stock-
based compensation expense, which has been allocated to each of
our reportable segments.

Effective January 1, 2018, we redefined our reportable segments as
a result of technological evolution and the increased overlap
between the various product offerings within our legacy Cable and
legacy Business Solutions reportable segments, as well as how we
allocate resources amongst, and the general management of, our
reportable segments. The results of our legacy Cable segment,
legacy Business Solutions segment, and our Smart Home
Monitoring products are presented within a redefined Cable
segment. Financial results related to our Smart Home Monitoring

104

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

the business, conduct valuation-related analyses, and make
decisions about capital.

The wholly-owned subsidiary through which our Rogers World Elite
Mastercard, Rogers Platinum Mastercard, and Fido Mastercard
programs are operated is regulated by the Office of
the
Superintendent of Financial
Institutions, which requires that a
minimum level of
regulatory capital be maintained. Rogers’
requirement as at
subsidiary was in compliance with that
December 31, 2018 and 2017. The capital requirements are not
material
to the Company as at December 31, 2018 or
December 31, 2017.

With the exception of the Rogers World Elite Mastercard, Rogers
Platinum Mastercard, and Fido Mastercard programs and the
subsidiary through which they are operated, we are not subject to
externally-imposed capital requirements. Our overall strategy for
capital risk management has not changed since December 31,
2017.

products were previously reported within Corporate items and
intercompany eliminations. We have retrospectively amended our
2017 comparative segment results to account for this redefinition.

We follow the same accounting policies for our segments as those
described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
We account for transactions between reportable segments in the
same way we account for transactions with external parties, but
eliminate them on consolidation.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
We make significant judgments in determining our operating
segments. These are components that engage in business activities
from which they may earn revenue and incur expenses, for which
operating results are regularly reviewed by our chief operating
decision makers to make decisions about resources to be allocated
and assess component performance, and for which discrete
financial information is available.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
Our reportable segments are Wireless, Cable, and Media (see
three segments operate substantially in Canada.
note 1). All
Corporate items and eliminations
in
businesses that are not reportable operating segments, corporate
administrative functions, and eliminations of inter-segment revenue
and costs. Segment results include items directly attributable to a
segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable
basis.

include our

interests

INFORMATION BY SEGMENT

Year ended December 31, 2018
(In millions of dollars)

Revenue
Operating costs

Adjusted EBITDA

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
Restructuring, acquisition and other
Finance costs
Other income

Income before income tax expense

Capital expenditures before proceeds on disposition 1
Goodwill
Total assets

1 Excludes proceeds on disposition of $25 million (see note 28).

Year ended December 31, 2017
(In millions of dollars)
(restated, see note 2)

Revenue
Operating costs

Adjusted EBITDA

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
Restructuring, acquisition and other
Finance costs
Other income

Income before income tax expense

Capital expenditures before proceeds on disposition 1
Goodwill
Total assets

1 Excludes proceeds on disposition of $74 million (see note 28).

NOTE 5: REVENUE

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Note Wireless Cable Media

Corporate
items and
eliminations

Consolidated
totals

5
6

9,200
5,110

3,932
2,058

2,168
1,972

4,090

1,874

196

(204)
(27)

(177)

7, 8
7
9
10
11

1,086
1,160
16,572

1,429
1,808
7,666

90
937
2,438

210
–
5,242

15,096
9,113

5,983

2,211
(16)
210
793
(32)

2,817

2,815
3,905
31,918

Note Wireless Cable Media

Corporate
items and
eliminations

Consolidated
totals

5
6

8,569
4,843

3,894
2,075

2,153
2,026

3,726

1,819

127

(247)
(77)

(170)

7, 8
7
9
10
11

806
1,160
15,860

1,334
1,808
7,315

83
937
2,405

287
–
4,910

14,369
8,867

5,502

2,142
(49)
152
746
(19)

2,530

2,510
3,905
30,490

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Contracts with customers
We record revenue from contracts with customers in accordance
with the five steps in IFRS 15 as follows:

identify the contract with a customer;
1.
identify the performance obligations in the contract;
2.
3. determine the transaction price, which is the total

4.

5.

consideration provided by the customer;
allocate the transaction price among the performance
obligations in the contract based on their relative fair
values; and
recognize revenue when the relevant criteria are met for
each performance obligation.

Many of our products and services are sold in bundled
arrangements (e.g. wireless handsets, and voice and data services).
Items in these arrangements are accounted for as separate
performance obligations if the item meets the definition of a
distinct good or service. We also determine whether a customer
can modify their contract within predefined terms such that we are
not able to enforce the transaction price agreed to, but can only
contractually enforce a lower amount. In situations such as these,
we allocate revenue between performance obligations using the
minimum enforceable rights and obligations and any excess
amount is recognized as revenue as it is earned.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

105

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Revenue for each performance obligation is recognized either over time (e.g. services) or at a point in time (e.g. equipment). For
performance obligations satisfied over time, revenue is recognized as the services are provided. These services are typically provided, and
thus recognized, on a monthly basis. Revenue for performance obligations satisfied at a point in time is recognized when control of the
item (or service) transfers to the customer. Typically, this is when the customer activates the goods (e.g. in the case of a wireless handset) or
has physical possession of the goods (e.g. other equipment). Below, we have outlined the nature of the various performance obligations in
our contracts with customers and when we recognize performance on those obligations.

Performance obligations from contracts with customers

Timing of satisfaction of the performance obligation

Wireless airtime and data services, cable, telephony, Internet, and
smart home monitoring services, network services, media
subscriptions, and rental of equipment

As the service is provided (usually monthly)

Roaming, long-distance, and other optional or non-subscription
services, and pay-per-use services

As the service is provided

Wireless devices and related equipment

Upon activation or purchase by the end customer

Installation services for Cable subscribers

When the services are performed

Advertising

When the advertising airs on our radio or television stations, is
featured in our publications, or displayed on our digital properties

Subscriptions by television stations for subscriptions from cable
and satellite providers

When the services are delivered to cable and satellite providers’
subscribers (usually monthly)

Toronto Blue Jays’ home game admission and concessions

When the related games are played during the baseball season
and when goods are sold

Toronto Blue Jays, radio, and television broadcast agreements

When the related games are aired

Sublicensing of program rights

Over the course of the applicable licence period

We also recognize interest revenue on credit card receivables using
the effective interest method in accordance with IFRS 9.

Payment terms for typical Wireless and Cable contracts range from
0 to 30 days, with payment for equipment due upon receipt of the
equipment and monthly service fees due 30 days after billing.
Payment terms for typical Media performance obligations range
from immediate (for example, Toronto Blue Jays tickets) to 30 days
(for example, advertising contracts).

Contract assets and liabilities
We record a contract asset when we have provided goods and
services to our customer but our right to related consideration for
the performance obligation is conditional on satisfying other
performance obligations. Contract assets primarily relate to our
rights to consideration for the transfer of wireless handsets.

We record a contract liability when we receive payment from a
customer in advance of providing goods and services. This includes
subscriber deposits, deposits related to Toronto Blue Jays ticket
sales, and amounts subscribers pay for services and subscriptions
that will be provided in future periods.

for

account

a
We
contract-by-contract basis, with each contract presented as either a
net contract asset or a net contract liability accordingly.

and liabilities on

contract

assets

related contracts. We therefore defer them as deferred commission
cost assets in other assets and amortize them to operating costs
over the pattern of the transfer of goods and services to the
customer, which is typically evenly over either 12 or 24 consecutive
months.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
We use estimates in the following key areas:
• determining the transaction price of our contracts requires
estimating the amount of revenue we expect to be entitled to for
delivering the performance obligations within a contract; and
• determining the stand-alone selling price of performance
obligations and the allocation of the transaction price between
performance obligations.

Determining the transaction price
is
The transaction price is the amount of consideration that
enforceable and to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for
the goods and services we have promised to our customer. We
determine the transaction price by considering the terms of the
contract and business practices that are customary within that
particular line of business. Discounts, rebates, refunds, credits, price
concessions,
incentives, penalties, and other similar items are
reflected in the transaction price at contract inception.

Deferred commission cost assets
We defer, to the extent recoverable, the incremental costs we incur
to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and amortize them
over their expected period of benefit. These costs include certain
commissions paid to internal and external representatives that we
believe to be recoverable through the revenue earned from the

Determining the stand-alone selling price and the allocation of the
transaction price
The transaction price is allocated to performance obligations based
on the relative stand-alone selling prices of the distinct goods or
services in the contract. The best evidence of a stand-alone selling

106

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

price is the observable price of a good or service when the entity
sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to
similar customers.
If a stand-alone selling price is not directly
observable, we estimate the stand-alone selling price taking into
account reasonably available information relating to the market
conditions, entity-specific factors, and the class of customer.

In determining the stand-alone selling price, we allocate revenue
between performance obligations based on expected minimum
enforceable amounts to which Rogers is entitled. Any amounts
above the minimum enforceable amounts are recognized as
revenue as they are earned.

JUDGMENTS
We make significant judgments in determining whether a promise
to deliver goods or services is considered distinct and in
determining the costs that are incremental to obtaining of fulfilling
a contract with a customer.

Distinct goods and services
We make judgments in determining whether a promise to deliver
goods or services is considered distinct. We account for individual
products and services separately if they are distinct (i.e. if a product
or service is separately identifiable from other items in the bundled
package and if the customer can benefit from it). The consideration
is allocated between separate products and services in a bundle
based on their stand-alone selling prices. For items we do not sell
separately (e.g. third-party gift cards), we estimate stand-alone
selling prices using the adjusted market assessment approach.

Determining costs to obtain or fulfill a contract
Determining the costs we incur to obtain or fulfill a contract that
meet the deferral criteria within IFRS 15 requires us to make
significant judgments. We expect incremental commission fees
paid to internal and external representatives as a result of obtaining
contracts with customers to be recoverable.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
CONTRACT ASSETS
Below is a summary of the current and long-term portions of
contract assets from contracts with customers and the significant
changes in those balances during the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017.

CONTRACT LIABILITIES
Below is a summary of the current portion of contract liabilities from
contracts with customers and the significant changes in those
balances during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars)

Balance, beginning of year
Revenue deferred in previous year and

Years ended December 31

2018

278

2017

302

recognized as revenue in current year

(268)

(284)

Net additions from contracts with

customers

Balance, end of year

223

233

260

278

DEFERRED COMMISSION COST ASSETS
Below is a summary of the changes in the deferred commission
cost assets recognized from the incremental costs incurred to
obtain contracts with customers during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017. The deferred commission cost
assets are presented within other current assets (when they will be
amortized into net income within twelve months of the date of the
financial statements) or other long-term assets.

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

Balance, beginning of year
Additions to deferred commission cost

assets

Amortization recognized on deferred

commission cost assets

Balance, end of year

2018

278

340

(322)

296

2017

260

310

(292)

278

UNSATISFIED PORTIONS OF PERFORMANCE OBLIGATIONS
The table below shows the revenue we expect to recognize in the
future related to unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance
obligations as at December 31, 2018. The unsatisfied portion of the
transaction price of the performance obligations relates to monthly
services; we expect to recognize it over the next three to five years.

(In millions of dollars)

2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total

Years ended December 31

Telecommunications

(In millions of dollars)

Balance, beginning of year
Additions from new contracts with

customers, net of terminations and
renewals

Amortization of contract assets to

accounts receivable

Balance, end of year

2018

1,233

2017

1,077

1,572

1,196

service

2,410

985

169

137 3,701

Upon adoption of, and transition to, IFRS 15, we have elected to
utilize the following practical expedients and not disclose:
• the unsatisfied portions of performance obligations related to

contracts with a duration of one year or less; or

(1,218)

(1,040)

1,587

1,233

• the unsatisfied portions of performance obligations where the
revenue we recognize corresponds with the amount invoiced to
the customer.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

107

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have also elected to use the practical expedient allowing us to
not disclose the amount of
the transaction price relating to
unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations for
reporting periods before January 1, 2018 (the date of
initial
application) and when we expect to recognize that amount as
revenue.

DISAGGREGATION OF REVENUE

(In millions of dollars)

Wireless

Service revenue
Equipment revenue

Total Wireless

Cable

Internet
Television
Phone

Service revenue
Equipment revenue

Total Cable

Total Media

7,091
2,109

9,200

2,114
1,442
363

3,919
13

3,932

2,168

Corporate items and

intercompany eliminations

(204)

Total revenue

15,096

Years ended December 31

2018

2017
(restated, see note 2)

6,765
1,804

8,569

1,967
1,501
411

3,879
15

3,894

2,153

(247)

14,369

NOTE 6: OPERATING COSTS

(In millions of dollars)

Cost of equipment sales
Merchandise for resale
Other external purchases
Employee salaries, benefits, and
stock-based compensation

Total operating costs

Years ended December 31

2018

2017
(restated, see note 2)

2,284
231
4,509

2,089

9,113

2,022
237
4,497

2,111

8,867

NOTE 7: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Recognition and measurement, including depreciation
We measure property, plant and equipment upon initial
recognition at cost and begin recognizing depreciation when the
asset is ready for its intended use. Subsequently, property, plant
and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation
and accumulated impairment losses.

Cost includes expenditures (capital expenditures) that are directly
the asset. The cost of self-
attributable to the acquisition of
constructed assets includes:
• the cost of materials and direct labour;
• costs directly associated with bringing the assets to a working

condition for their intended use;

We depreciate property, plant and equipment over its estimated
useful
life by charging depreciation expense to net income as
follows:

Asset

Basis

Estimated
useful life

Buildings
Cable and wireless network
Computer equipment and
software
Customer premise equipment Straight-line
Straight-line
Leasehold improvements

Diminishing balance 5 to 40 years
3 to 40 years
Straight-line
4 to 10 years
Straight-line

3 to 6 years
Over shorter of
estimated useful
life or lease term

• expected costs of decommissioning the items and restoring the

Equipment and vehicles

Diminishing balance 3 to 20 years

sites on which they are located (see note 19); and

• borrowing costs on qualifying assets.

108

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

We calculate gains and losses on the disposal of property, plant
and equipment by comparing the proceeds from the disposal with
the item’s carrying amount and recognize the gain or loss in net
income.

We capitalize development expenditures if they meet the criteria
for recognition as an asset and amortize them over their expected
useful lives once the assets to which they relate are available for use.
We expense research expenditures, maintenance costs, and
training costs as incurred.

Impairment testing
We test non-financial assets with finite useful lives for impairment
whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates that their
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The asset is impaired if
the recoverable amount is less than the carrying amount. If we
cannot estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset
because it does not generate independent cash inflows, we test
the entire cash generating unit (CGU) for impairment.

A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates
cash inflows largely independent of the cash inflows from other
assets or groups of assets.

Recognition and measurement of an impairment charge
An item of property, plant and equipment, an intangible asset, or
goodwill is impaired if the recoverable amount is less than the
carrying amount. The recoverable amount of a CGU or asset is the
higher of its:
• fair value less costs to sell; and
• value in use.

If our estimate of the asset’s or CGU’s recoverable amount is less
than its carrying amount, we reduce its carrying amount to the
recoverable amount and recognize the loss in net
income
immediately.

We reverse a previously recognized impairment loss if our estimate
of the recoverable amount of a previously impaired asset or CGU
has increased such that the impairment recognized in a previous
is recognized by increasing the
year has reversed. The reversal
asset’s or CGU’s carrying amount to our new estimate of
its
recoverable amount. The carrying amount of the asset or CGU
subsequent to the reversal cannot be greater than its carrying
amount if we had not recognized an impairment loss in previous
years.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
Components of an item of property, plant and equipment may
have different useful
lives. We make significant estimates when
determining depreciation rates and asset useful lives, which require
taking into account company-specific factors, such as our past
experience and expected use, and industry trends, such as
technological advancements. We monitor and review residual
values, depreciation rates, and asset useful lives at least once a year
and change them if they are different from our previous estimates.
We recognize the effect of changes in estimates in net income
prospectively.

In 2018, we reviewed the depreciation rates for all of our property,
plant and equipment. The review resulted in an increase in the

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

assets.

lives of certain of our customer premise
estimated useful
equipment
applied
prospectively. They did not have a material effect on our financial
statements in 2018 and they will not have a material effect on
depreciation in future periods.

have been

changes

These

We use estimates to determine certain costs that are directly
attributable to self-constructed assets. These estimates primarily
include certain internal and external direct labour, overhead, and
interest costs associated with the acquisition, construction,
development, or betterment of our networks.

Furthermore, we use estimates in determining the recoverable
amount of property, plant and equipment. The determination of
the recoverable amount for the purpose of impairment testing
requires the use of significant estimates, such as:
• future cash flows;
• terminal growth rates; and
• discount rates.

We estimate value in use for impairment tests by discounting
estimated future cash flows to their present value. We estimate the
discounted future cash flows for periods of up to five years,
depending on the CGU, and a terminal value. The future cash flows
are based on our estimates and expected future operating results
of the CGU after considering economic conditions and a general
outlook for the CGU’s industry. Our discount rates consider market
rates of return, debt to equity ratios, and certain risk premiums,
among other things. The terminal value is the value attributed to
the CGU’s operations beyond the projected time period of the
cash flows using a perpetuity rate based on expected economic
conditions and a general outlook for the industry.

We determine fair value less costs to sell in one of the following two
ways:
• Analyzing discounted cash flows – we estimate the discounted
future cash flows for five-year periods and a terminal value,
similar to the value in use methodology described above, while
applying assumptions consistent with those a market participant
would make. Future cash flows are based on our estimates of
expected future operating results of the CGU. Our estimates of
future cash flows, terminal values, and discount rates consider
similar
factors to those described above for value in use
estimates; or

• Using a market approach – we estimate the recoverable amount
the CGU using multiples of operating performance of

of
comparable entities and precedent transactions in that industry.

We make certain assumptions when deriving expected future cash
flows, which may include assumptions pertaining to discount and
terminal growth rates. These assumptions may differ or change
quickly depending on economic conditions or other events. It is
therefore possible that
future changes in assumptions may
negatively affect future valuations of CGUs and goodwill, which
could result in impairment losses.

judgments

JUDGMENTS
for
We make significant
depreciating our property, plant and equipment that we believe
most accurately represent the consumption of benefits derived
from those assets and are most representative of the economic
substance of the intended use of the underlying assets.

in choosing methods

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

109

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars)

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Land and buildings
Cable and wireless networks
Computer equipment and software
Customer premise equipment
Leasehold improvements
Equipment and vehicles

Total property, plant and equipment

Accumulated
depreciation

Net
carrying
amount

Accumulated
depreciation

Cost

(428)
(13,550)
(3,305)
(1,279)
(250)
(810)

697

1,090
7,474 20,252
4,996
2,209
1,565
629
496
289
1,246
482

(397)
(13,206)
(2,807)
(1,090)
(220)
(782)

Net
carrying
amount

693
7,046
2,189
475
276
464

Cost

1,062
20,108
4,296
1,560
457
1,169

Accumulated
depreciation

(375)
(13,035)
(2,424)
(1,156)
(193)
(720)

Net
carrying
amount

687
7,073
1,872
404
264
449

(19,622) 11,780 29,645

(18,502) 11,143

28,652

(17,903) 10,749

Cost

1,125
21,024
5,514
1,908
539
1,292

31,402

The tables below summarize the changes in the net carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment during 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars)

Land and buildings
Cable and wireless networks
Computer equipment and software
Customer premise equipment
Leasehold improvements
Equipment and vehicles

Total property, plant and equipment

1 Excludes proceeds on disposition of $25 million (see note 28).
2 Includes disposals, reclassifications, and other adjustments.

(In millions of dollars)

Land and buildings
Cable and wireless networks
Computer equipment and software
Customer premise equipment
Leasehold improvements
Equipment and vehicles

Total property, plant and equipment

December 31, 2017

Net carrying

December 31, 2018

amount Additions 1 Depreciation

Other 2

693
7,046
2,189
475
276
464

11,143

40
1,556
653
423
44
99

2,815

(32)
(1,128)
(633)
(269)
(31)
(81)

(2,174)

(4)
–
–
–
–
–

(4)

Net carrying
amount

697
7,474
2,209
629
289
482

11,780

December 31, 2016

Net carrying

December 31, 2017

amount Additions 1 Depreciation

Other 2

687
7,073
1,872
404
264
449

10,749

61
1,125
867
315
40
102

2,510

(30)
(1,150)
(549)
(244)
(28)
(86)

(2,087)

(25)
(2)
(1)
–
–
(1)

(29)

Net carrying
amount

693
7,046
2,189
475
276
464

11,143

1 Excludes proceeds on disposition of $74 million (see note 28).
2 Includes disposals, reclassifications, and other adjustments.

Property, plant and equipment not yet in service and therefore not
subject
to depreciation as at December 31, 2018 was
$1,339 million (2017 – $1,076 million). During 2018, capitalized
interest pertaining to property, plant and equipment was
recognized at a weighted average rate of approximately 3.9%
(2017 – 4.0%).

In 2018, we disposed of certain assets with a net carrying amount
of $9 million (2017 – $25 million). We received total proceeds of

110

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

$25 million (2017 – $74 million)
recognizing a $16 million (2017 – $49 million) gain on disposition.

these assets,

thereby

for

Annually, we perform an analysis to identify fully depreciated assets
that have been disposed of. In 2018, this resulted in an adjustment
to cost and accumulated depreciation of $943 million (2017 –
$1,136 million). The disposals had nil impact on the Consolidated
Statements of Income.

NOTE 8: INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

ACCOUNTING POLICY
RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT, INCLUDING
AMORTIZATION
Upon initial recognition, we measure intangible assets at cost
unless they are acquired through a business combination, in which
case they are measured at
fair value. We begin recognizing
amortization on intangible assets with finite useful lives when the
asset is ready for its intended use. Subsequently, the asset is carried
at
accumulated amortization and accumulated
impairment losses.

cost

less

Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the
the asset. The cost of a separately-acquired
acquisition of
intangible asset comprises:
• its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable
purchase taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates;
and

• any directly attributable cost of preparing the asset

for its

intended use.

Indefinite useful lives
We do not amortize intangible assets with indefinite lives, including
spectrum licences, broadcast licences, and certain brand names.

Finite useful lives
We amortize intangible assets with finite useful lives, other than
acquired program rights, into depreciation and amortization on the
Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives as noted in the table below. We monitor
and review the useful
lives, residual values, and amortization
methods at least once per year and change them if they are
different from our previous estimates. We recognize the effects of
changes in estimates in net income prospectively.

Intangible asset

Estimated useful life

Customer relationships

3 to 10 years

Acquired program rights
Program rights are contractual rights we acquire from third parties
to broadcast programs, including rights to broadcast live sporting
events. We recognize them at cost less accumulated amortization
and accumulated impairment losses. We capitalize program rights
on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position when the
licence period begins and the program is available for use and
amortize them to other external purchases in operating costs on
the Consolidated Statements of
the expected
Income over
exhibition period.
If we have no intention to air programs, we
consider the related program rights impaired and write them off.
Otherwise, we test them for impairment as intangible assets with
finite useful lives.

The costs for multi-year sports and television broadcast rights
agreements are recognized in operating expenses during the
applicable seasons based on the pattern in which the rights are
aired or are expected to be consumed. To the extent
that
prepayments are made at the commencement of a multi-year

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

contract towards future years’ rights fees, these prepayments are
recognized as intangible assets and amortized to operating
expenses over the contract term. To the extent that prepayments
are made for annual contractual fees within a season, they are
included in other current assets on our Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position, as the rights will be consumed within the next
twelve months.

Goodwill
We recognize goodwill arising from business combinations when
the fair value of the separately identifiable assets we acquired and
liabilities we assumed is lower than the consideration we paid
(including the recognized amount of the non-controlling interest, if
any). If the fair value of the consideration transferred is lower than
that of
the separately identified assets and liabilities, we
immediately recognize the difference as a gain in net income.

IMPAIRMENT TESTING
We test intangible assets with finite useful
lives for impairment
whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates that their
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We test indefinite-life
intangible assets and goodwill for impairment once per year as at
October 1, or more frequently if we identify indicators of
impairment.

If we cannot estimate the recoverable amount of an individual
intangible asset because it does not generate independent cash
inflows, we test the entire CGU to which it belongs for impairment.

Goodwill is allocated to CGUs (or groups of CGUs) based on the
level at which management monitors goodwill, which cannot be
higher than an operating segment. The allocation of goodwill is
made to CGUs (or groups of CGUs) that are expected to benefit
from the synergies of the business combination from which the
goodwill arose.

Recognition and measurement of an impairment charge
An intangible asset or goodwill
is impaired if the recoverable
amount is less than the carrying amount. The recoverable amount
of a CGU or asset is the higher of its:
• fair value less costs to sell; and
• value in use.

We reverse a previously recognized impairment loss, except in
respect of goodwill, if our estimate of the recoverable amount of a
previously impaired asset or CGU has increased such that the
impairment recognized in a previous year has reversed. The
reversal is recognized by increasing the asset’s or CGU’s carrying
amount to our new estimate of
its recoverable amount. The
carrying amount of the asset or CGU subsequent to the reversal
cannot be greater than its carrying amount had we not recognized
an impairment loss in previous years.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

111

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
We use estimates in determining the recoverable amount of
intangible assets and goodwill. The determination of
the
recoverable amount for the purpose of impairment testing requires
the use of significant estimates, such as:
• future cash flows;
• terminal growth rates; and
• discount rates.

We estimate value in use for impairment tests by discounting
estimated future cash flows to their present value. We estimate the
discounted future cash flows for periods of up to five years,
depending on the CGU, and a terminal value. The future cash flows
are based on our estimates and expected future operating results
of the CGU after considering economic conditions and a general
outlook for the CGU’s industry. Our discount rates consider market
rates of return, debt to equity ratios, and certain risk premiums,
among other things. The terminal value is the value attributed to
the CGU’s operations beyond the projected time period of the
cash flows using a perpetuity rate based on expected economic
conditions and a general outlook for the industry.

We determine fair value less costs to sell in one of the following two
ways:
• Analyzing discounted cash flows – we estimate the discounted
future cash flows for five-year periods and a terminal value,
similar to the value in use methodology described above, while
applying assumptions consistent with those a market participant
would make. Future cash flows are based on our estimates of
expected future operating results of the CGU. Our estimates of
future cash flows, terminal values, and discount rates consider
similar
factors to those described above for value in use
estimates; or

• Using a market approach – we estimate the recoverable amount
the CGU using multiples of operating performance of

of
comparable entities and precedent transactions in that industry.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

We make certain assumptions when deriving expected future cash
flows, which may include assumptions pertaining to discount and
terminal growth rates. These assumptions may differ or change
quickly depending on economic conditions or other events. It is
therefore possible that
future changes in assumptions may
negatively affect future valuations of CGUs and goodwill, which
could result in impairment losses.

If our estimate of the asset’s or CGU’s recoverable amount is less
than its carrying amount, we reduce its carrying amount to the
income
recoverable amount and recognize the loss in net
immediately.

JUDGMENTS
We make significant judgments that affect the measurement of our
intangible assets and goodwill.

Judgment is applied when deciding to designate our spectrum
and broadcast licences as assets with indefinite useful lives since we
believe the licences are likely to be renewed for the foreseeable
future such that there is no limit to the period over which these
assets are expected to generate net cash inflows. We make
judgments to determine that these assets have indefinite lives,
analyzing all relevant factors, including the expected usage of the
asset, the typical life cycle of the asset, and anticipated changes in
the market demand for the products and services the asset helps
generate. After review of the competitive, legal, regulatory, and
other factors, it is our view that these factors do not limit the useful
lives of our spectrum and broadcast licences.

Judgment is also applied in choosing methods of amortizing our
intangible assets and program rights that we believe most
accurately represent the consumption of those assets and are most
representative of the economic substance of the intended use of
the underlying assets.

Finally, we make judgments in determining CGUs and the
allocation of goodwill to CGUs or groups of CGUs for the purpose
of impairment testing.

(In millions of dollars)

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Cost prior to
impairment
losses

Accumulated
amortization

Accumulated
impairment
losses

Net
carrying
amount

Cost prior to
impairment
losses

Accumulated
amortization

Accumulated
impairment
losses

Net
carrying
amount

Cost prior to
impairment
losses

Accumulated
amortization

Accumulated
impairment
losses

Net
carrying
amount

Indefinite-life intangible

assets:

Spectrum licences
Broadcast licences
Brand names

Finite-life intangible assets:
Customer relationships
Acquired program rights

Total intangible assets

Goodwill

Total intangible assets and

6,600
333
420

1,609
251

9,213
4,126

–
–
(270)

(1,562)
(58)

(1,890)
–

–
(99)
(14)

6,600
234
136

–
(5)

47
188

(118) 7,205
(221) 3,905

6,600
329
420

1,609
263

9,221
4,126

–
–
(270)

(1,525)
(64)

(1,859)
–

–
(99)
(14)

6,600
230
136

–
(5)

84
194

(118) 7,244
(221) 3,905

6,416
329
420

1,609
289

9,063
4,126

–
–
(270)

(1,470)
(75)

(1,815)
–

–
(99)
(14)

6,416
230
136

–
(5)

139
209

(118) 7,130
(221) 3,905

goodwill

13,339

(1,890)

(339) 11,110

13,347

(1,859)

(339) 11,149

13,189

(1,815)

(339) 11,035

112

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

The tables below summarize the changes in the net carrying amounts of intangible assets and goodwill in 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars)

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2018

Spectrum licences
Broadcast licences
Brand names
Customer relationships

Acquired program rights

Total intangible assets
Goodwill

Total intangible assets and goodwill

Net carrying
amount

Net
additions

Amortization 1

Other 2

Net carrying
amount

6,600
230
136
84

7,050
194

7,244
3,905

11,149

–
4
–
–

4
54

58
–

58

–
–
–
(37)

(37)
(58)

(95)
–

(95)

–
–
–
–

–
(2)

(2)
–

(2)

6,600
234
136
47

7,017
188

7,205
3,905

11,110

1 Of the $95 million of total amortization, $58 million related to acquired program rights is included in other external purchases in operating costs (see note 6), and $37 million in

depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

2 Includes disposals, writedowns, reclassifications, and other adjustments.

(In millions of dollars)

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2017

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Spectrum licences
Broadcast licences
Brand names
Customer relationships

Acquired program rights

Total intangible assets
Goodwill

Total intangible assets and goodwill

Net carrying
amount

Net
additions

Amortization 1

Other 2

Net carrying
amount

6,416
230
136
139

6,921
209

7,130
3,905

11,035

184
11
–
–

195
59

254
–

254

–
–
–
(55)

(55)
(64)

(119)
–

(119)

–
(11)
–
–

(11)
(10)

(21)
–

(21)

6,600
230
136
84

7,050
194

7,244
3,905

11,149

1 Of the $119 million of total amortization, $64 million related to acquired program rights is included in other external purchases in operating costs (see note 6), and $55 million in

depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

2 Includes disposals, writedowns, reclassifications, and other adjustments.

ANNUAL IMPAIRMENT TESTING
For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, our CGUs, or groups of CGUs, correspond to our operating segments as disclosed in
note 4.

Below is an overview of the methods and key assumptions we used in 2018 to determine recoverable amounts for CGUs, or groups of
CGUs, with indefinite-life intangible assets or goodwill that we consider significant.

(In millions of dollars, except periods used and rates)

Carrying value
of goodwill

Carrying value
of indefinite-life
intangible assets

Recoverable
amount method

Period of
projected cash
flows (years)

Terminal growth
rates (%)

Pre-tax discount
rates (%)

Wireless
Cable
Media

1,160
1,808
937

6,734 Value in use
– Value in use

236

Fair value less cost to sell

5
5
5

0.5
1.5
2.0

8.4
7.8
11.3

Our fair value measurement for Media is classified as Level 3 in the
fair value hierarchy.

We did not recognize an impairment charge related to our
goodwill or
intangible assets in 2018 or 2017 because the
recoverable amounts of the CGUs exceeded their carrying values.

NOTE 9: RESTRUCTURING, ACQUISITION AND OTHER

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred
$210 million (2017 – $152 million) in restructuring, acquisition and
other expenses. These expenses in 2018 and 2017 primarily

consisted of
severance costs associated with the targeted
restructuring of our employee base and certain sports-related and
other contract termination costs.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

113

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10: FINANCE COSTS

(In millions of dollars)

Note

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Interest on borrowings 1
Interest on post-employment benefits

liability

Loss on repayment of long-term debt
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange
Change in fair value of derivative

22
20

instruments

Capitalized interest
Other

Total finance costs

709

740

14
28
136

(95)
(20)
21

12
–
(107)

99
(18)
20

793

746

1 Interest on borrowings includes interest on short-term borrowings and on long-term

debt.

LOSS ON REPAYMENT OF LONG-TERM DEBT
We recognized a $28 million loss on repayment of long-term debt
this year
redemption premiums
associated with our redemption of US$1.4 billion of senior notes in
April 2018 that were otherwise due in August 2018. See note 20 for
more information.

reflecting the payment of

FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
We recognized $136 million in net foreign exchange losses in 2018
(2017 – $107 million in net gains). These losses in 2018 were
primarily attributed to our US dollar-denominated commercial
paper (US CP) program borrowings (see note 16).

NOTE 11: OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE

(In millions of dollars)

Note

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Income from associates and joint

ventures

Other investment income

Total other income

NOTE 12: INCOME TAXES

17

–
(32)

(32)

(14)
(5)

(19)

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Income tax expense includes both current and deferred taxes. We
recognize income tax expense in net income unless it relates to an
item recognized directly in equity or other comprehensive income.
We provide for income taxes based on all of the information that is
currently available.

Current tax expense is tax we expect to pay or receive based on
our taxable income or loss during the year. We calculate the
current
tax expense using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted as at the reporting date, including any adjustment to taxes
payable or receivable related to previous years.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities we
recognize on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
and their respective tax bases. We calculate deferred tax assets and

These foreign exchange losses were partially offset by the
$95 million gain related to the change in fair value of derivatives
(2017 – $99 million loss), which was primarily attributed to the debt
derivatives, which were not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes, we used to partially offset the foreign exchange risk
related to these US dollar-denominated borrowings. In 2017, these
foreign exchange gains were primarily attributed to our US dollar-
denominated commercial paper (US CP) program borrowings and
the US dollar-denominated borrowings under our bank credit
facilities that were not hedged for accounting purposes.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we determined that
we would no longer be able to exercise certain ten-year bond
forward derivatives within the originally designated time frame.
Consequently, we discontinued hedge accounting on those bond
forward derivatives and reclassified a $21 million loss from the
hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity to finance costs
(recorded in “change in fair value of derivative instruments”). We
subsequently extended the bond forwards to May 31, 2019, with
the ability to extend them further, and redesignated them as
effective hedges. See note 16 for more information on our bond
forward derivatives.

In 2017, we recognized a $20 million provision reversal related to
the wind-down of shomi, which accompanied the windup of the
partnership (see note 17). This reversal was recorded in income
from associates and joint ventures.

liabilities using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates that will
apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected
to reverse.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally
enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and they
relate to income taxes levied by the same authority on:
• the same taxable entity; or
• different taxable entities where these entities intend to settle
current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis or the tax assets
and liabilities will be realized and settled simultaneously.

We recognize a deferred tax asset for unused losses, tax credits,
and deductible temporary differences to the extent it is probable
that future taxable income will be available to use the asset.

114

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
We make significant
judgments in interpreting tax rules and
regulations when we calculate income tax expense. We make
judgments to evaluate whether we can recover a deferred tax asset
based on our assessment of existing tax laws, estimates of future
profitability, and tax planning strategies.

Below is a summary of the difference between income tax expense
computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income
before income tax expense and the income tax expense for the
year.

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars, except rates)

Statutory income tax rate
Income before income tax expense

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

Computed income tax expense
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense

resulting from:

Years ended December 31

2018

26.7%
2,817

752

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

26.7%
2,530

676

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars)

Current tax expense:
Total current tax expense
Deferred tax expense:

Origination of temporary differences
Revaluation of deferred tax balances

due to legislative changes

Total deferred tax expense

Total income tax expense

483

275

–

275

758

351

332

2

334

685

Non-deductible stock-based

compensation

Non-deductible portion of equity

losses

Non-deductible loss on FVTOCI

investments

Income tax adjustment, legislative tax

change

Non-taxable portion of capital gains
Other

5

1

–

–
(9)
9

Total income tax expense
Effective income tax rate

758
26.9%

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

9

–

7

2
(10)
1

685
27.1%

(In millions of dollars)

Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax liability

As at December 31

2018

–
(2,910)

(2,910)

2017

(restated,
see note 2)

3
(2,624)

(2,621)

Below is a summary of the movement of net deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2018 and 2017.

Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
(In millions of dollars)

January 1, 2018
(Expense) recovery in net income
Recovery (expense) in other comprehensive

income

December 31, 2018

Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
(In millions of dollars)
(restated, see note 2)

Property,
plant and
equipment
and inventory

Goodwill
and other
intangibles

Investments

Non-capital
loss
carryforwards

Contract and
deferred
commission
cost assets

(1,060)
(85)

(1,075)
(117)

–

–

(1,145)

(1,192)

(126)
(3)

63

(66)

18
11

–

29

(418)
(97)

–

(515)

Property,
plant and
equipment
and inventory

Goodwill
and other
intangibles

Non-capital
loss
carryforwards

Contract and
deferred
commission
cost assets

Investments

January 1, 2017
Expense in net income
(Expense) recovery in other comprehensive income
Other

(947)
(113)
–
–

(953)
(117)
–
(5)

(61)
(3)
(62)
–

December 31, 2017

(1,060)

(1,075)

(126)

24
(6)
–
–

18

(368)
(50)
–
–

(418)

Other

Total

40
16

(77)

(21)

(2,621)
(275)

(14)

(2,910)

Other

Total

28
(45)
57
–

40

(2,277)
(334)
(5)
(5)

(2,621)

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

115

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have not recognized deferred tax assets for the following items:

(In millions of dollars)

Realized and accrued capital losses in

Canada that can be applied against future
capital gains

Tax losses in foreign jurisdictions that expire

between 2023 and 2037

Deductible temporary differences in foreign

jurisdictions

Total unrecognized temporary differences

191

As at December 31

2018

2017

98

68

25

–

41

23

64

NOTE 13: EARNINGS PER SHARE

ACCOUNTING POLICY
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing the net income
or loss attributable to our RCI Class A Voting and RCI Class B
Non-Voting shareholders by the weighted average number of RCI
Class A Voting and RCI Class B Non-Voting shares (Class A Shares
and Class B Non-Voting Shares, respectively) outstanding during
the year.

We calculate diluted earnings per share by adjusting the net
income or loss attributable to Class A and Class B Non-Voting
shareholders and the weighted average number of Class A Shares
and Class B Non-Voting Shares outstanding for the effect of all
dilutive potential common shares. We use the treasury stock
method for calculating diluted earnings per share, which considers
the impact of employee stock options and other potentially dilutive
instruments.

Options with tandem stock appreciation rights or cash payment
alternatives are accounted for as cash-settled awards. As these
awards can be exchanged for common shares of the Company,
they are considered potentially dilutive and are included in the
calculation of the Company’s diluted net earnings per share if they
have a dilutive impact in the period.

116

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

There are taxable temporary differences associated with our
investments in Canadian domestic subsidiaries. We do not
recognize deferred tax liabilities for these temporary differences
because we are able to control the timing of the reversal and the
reversal is not probable in the foreseeable future. Reversing these
taxable temporary differences is not expected to result in any
significant tax implications.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts)

Numerator (basic) – Net income for

Years ended December 31

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

the year

2,059

1,845

Denominator – Number of shares (in

millions):

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding – basic
Effect of dilutive securities (in millions):
Employee stock options and

restricted share units

Weighted average number of shares

outstanding – diluted

Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

515

1

516

515

2

517

$ 4.00
$ 3.99

$ 3.58
$ 3.57

the year ended December 31, 2018, accounting for
For
outstanding share-based payments using the equity-settled
method for stock-based compensation was determined to be
more dilutive than using the cash-settled method. As a result, net
income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was reduced by
$2 million in the diluted earnings per share calculation. There was
no effect for the year ended December 31, 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, there were 37,715 options
out of the money (2017 – 489,835) for purposes of the calculation
of earnings per share. These options were excluded from the
calculation of the effect of dilutive securities because they were
anti-dilutive.

NOTE 14: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

ACCOUNTING POLICY
We initially recognize accounts receivable on the date they
originate. We measure accounts receivable initially at fair value, and
subsequently at amortized cost, with changes recognized in net
income. We measure an impairment loss for accounts receivable as
the excess of the carrying amount over the present value of future
cash flows we expect to derive from it, if any. The excess is allocated
to an allowance for doubtful accounts and recognized as a loss in
net income.

NOTE 15: INVENTORIES

including wireless devices

ACCOUNTING POLICY
We measure inventories,
and
merchandise for resale, at the lower of cost (determined on a
weighted average cost basis for Wireless devices and accessories
and a first-in,
finished goods and
merchandise) and net realizable value. We reverse a previous
writedown to net realizable value, not to exceed the original
recognized cost, if the inventories later increase in value.

first-out basis for other

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars)

Note

As at December 31

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

Customer accounts receivable

Other accounts receivable
Allowance for doubtful accounts

Total accounts receivable

16

1,529
785
(55)

2,259

1,443
653
(61)

2,035

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars)

Wireless devices and accessories
Other finished goods and merchandise

Total inventories

As at December 31

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

399
67

466

373
62

435

Cost of equipment sales and merchandise for resale includes
$2,515 million (2017 – $2,259 million) of inventory costs for 2018.

NOTE 16: FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Recognition
We initially recognize cash and cash equivalents, bank advances, accounts receivable, debt securities, and accounts payable and accrued
liabilities on the date they originate. All other financial assets and financial liabilities are initially recognized on the trade date when we
become a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

117

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Classification and measurement
We measure financial instruments by grouping them into classes upon initial recognition, based on the purpose of the individual
instruments. We initially measure all financial instruments at fair value plus, in the case of our financial instruments not classified as FVTPL or
FVTOCI, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issuance of the financial instruments. The classifications and
methods of measurement subsequent to initial recognition of our financial assets and financial liabilities are as follows:

Financial instrument

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Investments, measured at FVTOCI

Financial liabilities
Bank advances
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Long-term debt

Derivatives 2

Debt derivatives 3
Bond forwards
Expenditure derivatives
Equity derivatives

Classification and measurement method

Amortized cost
Amortized cost
FVTOCI with no reclassification to net income 1

Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost

FVTOCI and FVTPL
FVTOCI
FVTOCI
FVTPL 4

1 Subsequently measured at fair value with changes recognized in the FVTOCI investment reserve.
2 Derivatives can be in an asset or liability position at a point in time historically or in the future. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, the effective

portion of the hedge is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion of the hedge is recognized immediately into net income.

3 Debt derivatives related to our credit facility and commercial paper borrowings have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes and are measured at FVTPL. Debt

derivatives related to our senior notes and debentures are designated as hedges for accounting purposes and are measured at FVTOCI.

4 Subsequent changes are offset against stock-based compensation expense or recovery in operating costs.

Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
We offset financial assets and financial liabilities and present the net amount on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position when
we have a legal right to offset them and intend to settle on a net basis or realize the asset and liability simultaneously.

Derivative instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage risks related to certain activities in which we are involved. They include:

Derivatives

The risk they manage

Types of derivative instruments

Debt derivatives

Impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on
principal and interest payments for US dollar-
denominated senior notes and debentures, credit
facility
paper
and
borrowings

borrowings,

commercial

Cross-currency interest rate exchange agreements
Forward foreign exchange agreements (from time to
time as necessary)

Bond forwards

Expenditure derivatives

Equity derivatives

Impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on
forecast interest payments for expected long-term
debt

Impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on
forecast US dollar-denominated expenditures

Impact of fluctuations in share price on stock-based
compensation expense

Forward interest rate agreements

Forward foreign exchange agreements

Total return swap agreements

We use derivatives only to manage risk, and not for speculative
purposes.

When we designate a derivative instrument as a hedging
instrument for accounting purposes, we first determine that the
hedging instrument will be highly effective in offsetting the
changes in fair value or cash flows of the item it is hedging. We
then formally document the relationship between the hedging
instrument and hedged item,
including the risk management
objectives and strategy and the methods we will use to assess the
ongoing effectiveness of the hedging relationship.

We assess, on a quarterly basis, whether each hedging instrument
continues to be highly effective in offsetting the changes in the fair
value or cash flows of the item it is hedging.

We assess host contracts in order to identify embedded derivatives.
Embedded derivatives are separated from the host contract and
accounted for as separate derivatives if the host contract is not a
financial asset and certain criteria are met.

118

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Hedge ratio
Our policy is to hedge 100% of the foreign currency risk arising
from principal and interest payment obligations on US dollar-
denominated senior notes and debentures. We typically hedge up
to 100% of forecast foreign currency expenditures net of foreign
currency cash inflows. We have also hedged up to 100% of the
interest rate risk on forecast future senior note issuances.

Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve represents the accumulated change in fair
value of the derivative instruments to the extent they were effective
hedges for accounting purposes,
less accumulated amounts
reclassified into net income.

Deferred transaction costs and discounts
We defer transaction costs and discounts associated with issuing
long-term debt and direct costs we pay to lenders to obtain
revolving credit facilities and amortize them using the effective
interest method over the life of the related instrument.

FVTOCI investment reserve
The FVTOCI
reserve represents the accumulated
investment
change in fair value of our equity investments that are measured at
losses related to the
FVTOCI
investments and accumulated amounts reclassified into equity.

less accumulated impairment

Impairment (expected credit losses)
We consider the credit risk of a financial asset at initial recognition
and at each reporting period thereafter until it is derecognized. For
a financial asset that is determined to have low credit risk at the
reporting date and that has not had significant increases in credit
risk since initial recognition, we measure any impairment loss based
on the credit losses we expect to recognize over the next twelve
months. For other financial assets, we will measure an impairment
loss based on the lifetime expected credit losses. Certain assets,
such as trade receivables and contract assets without significant
financing components, must always be recorded at
lifetime
expected credit losses.

Lifetime expected credit losses are estimates of all possible default
events over the expected life of a financial
instrument. Twelve-
month expected credit losses are estimates of all possible default
events within twelve months of the reporting date or over the
expected life of a financial instrument, whichever is shorter.

Financial assets that are significant in value are assessed individually.
All other financial assets are assessed collectively based on the
nature of each asset.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

We measure impairment for financial assets as follows:
• Contract assets – we measure an impairment loss for contract
assets based on the lifetime expected credit losses, which is
allocated to an allowance for doubtful accounts and recognized
as a loss in net income (see note 5).

• Accounts receivable – we measure an impairment

loss for
accounts receivable based on the lifetime expected credit losses,
which is allocated to an allowance for doubtful accounts and
recognized as a loss in net income (see note 14).

• Investments measured at FVTOCI – we measure an impairment
loss for equity investments measured at FVTOCI as the excess of
the cost to acquire the asset (less any impairment loss we have
previously recognized) over its current fair value,
if any. The
difference is recognized in the FVTOCI investment reserve.

We consider financial assets to be in default when, in the case of
contract assets and accounts receivable, the counterparty is unlikely
to satisfy its obligations to us in full. Our investments measured at
FVTOCI cannot default. To determine if our financial assets are in
default, we consider the amount of time for which it has been
outstanding, the reason for the amount being outstanding (for
example, if the customer has ongoing service or if they have been
deactivated, whether voluntarily or involuntarily), and the risk profile
of
the underlying customers. We typically write-off accounts
receivable when they have been outstanding for a significant
period of time.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
Fair value estimates related to our derivatives are made at a specific
point in time based on relevant market information and information
about the underlying financial instruments. These estimates require
assessment of the credit risk of the parties to the instruments and
the instruments’ discount rates. These fair values and underlying
estimates are also used in the tests of effectiveness of our hedging
relationships.

instruments qualify

JUDGMENTS
judgments in determining whether our
We make significant
financial
for hedge accounting. These
judgments include assessing whether the forecast transactions
designated as hedged items in hedging relationships will
materialize as
the hedging relationships
designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes continue
to qualitatively be effective, and determining the methodology to
determine the fair values used in testing the effectiveness of
hedging relationships.

forecast, whether

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

119

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
We are exposed to credit, liquidity, market price, foreign exchange,
and interest rate risks. Our primary risk management objective is to
protect our income, cash flows, and, ultimately, shareholder value.
We design and implement
the risk management strategies
discussed below to ensure our risks and the related exposures are
consistent with our business objectives and risk tolerance. Below is
a summary of our potential risk exposures by financial instrument.

Financial instrument

Financial risks

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents Credit and foreign exchange
Credit and foreign exchange
Accounts receivable
Liquidity, market price, and
Investments, measured
foreign exchange
at FVTOCI

Financial liabilities

Bank advances
Short-term borrowings

Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Long-term debt

Derivatives 1

Debt derivatives

Bond forwards

Expenditure derivatives

Equity derivatives

Liquidity
Liquidity, foreign exchange,
and interest rate
Liquidity
Liquidity
Liquidity, foreign exchange,
and interest rate

Credit, liquidity, and foreign
exchange
Credit, liquidity, and interest
rate
Credit, liquidity, and foreign
exchange
Credit, liquidity, and market
price

1 Derivatives can be in an asset or liability position at a point in time historically or in the

future.

CREDIT RISK
Credit risk represents the financial loss we could experience if a
counterparty to a financial
instrument, from whom we have an
amount owing, failed to meet its obligations under the terms and
conditions of its contracts with us.

Our credit risk exposure is primarily attributable to our accounts
receivable and to our debt, expenditure, and equity derivatives.
Our broad customer base limits the concentration of this risk. Our
accounts receivable on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position are net of allowances for doubtful accounts, which
management estimates based on lifetime expected credit losses.

Below is summary of
receivable.

the aging of our customer accounts

(In millions of dollars)

Customer accounts receivable (net of
allowance for doubtful accounts)

Less than 30 days past billing date
30-60 days past billing date
61-90 days past billing date
Greater than 90 days past billing date

Total

As at December 31

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

970
300
100
104

894
303
113
72

1,474

1,382

Below is a summary of the activity related to our allowance for
doubtful accounts.

(In millions of dollars)

Balance, beginning of year
Allowance for doubtful accounts

expense

Net use 1

Balance, end of year

Years ended December 31

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

61

201
(207)

55

59

179
(177)

61

1 Includes $17 million of recoveries arising from the sale of fully provided for accounts

receivable for the year ended December 31, 2018 (2017 – nil).

We use various controls and processes, such as credit checks,
deposits on account, and billing in advance, to mitigate credit risk.
We monitor and take appropriate action to suspend services when
customers have fully used their approved credit limits or violated
established payment
terms. While our credit controls and
processes have been effective in managing credit risk, they cannot
eliminate credit risk and there can be no assurance that these
controls will continue to be effective or that our current credit loss
experience will continue.

Credit
risk related to our debt derivatives, bond forwards,
expenditure derivatives, and equity derivatives arises from the
possibility that the counterparties to the agreements may default
on their obligations. We assess the creditworthiness of
the
counterparties to minimize the risk of counterparty default and do
not require collateral or other security to support the credit risk
associated with these derivatives. Counterparties to the entire
portfolio of our derivatives are financial
institutions with a S&P
Global Ratings (or the equivalent) ranging from A+ to AA-.

financing
Our accounts receivable do not contain significant
components and therefore we measure our allowance for doubtful
accounts using lifetime expected credit losses related to our
accounts receivable. We believe the allowance for doubtful
accounts sufficiently reflects the credit risk associated with our
accounts receivable. As at December 31, 2018, $477 million
(2017 – $489 million) of gross accounts receivable are considered
past due, which is defined as amounts outstanding beyond normal
credit terms and conditions for the respective customers.

LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our financial
obligations as they fall due. We manage liquidity risk by managing
our commitments and maturities, capital structure, and financial
leverage (see note 3). We also manage liquidity risk by continually
monitoring actual and projected cash flows to ensure we will have
sufficient liquidity to meet our liabilities when due, under both
normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable
losses or risking damage to our reputation.

120

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Below is a summary of the undiscounted contractual maturities of our financial liabilities and the receivable components of our derivatives
as at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

December 31, 2018
(In millions of dollars)

Carrying
amount

Contractual
cash flows

Less than
1 year

Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Long-term debt
Other long-term financial liabilities
Expenditure derivative instruments:
Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar)

Equity derivative instruments
Debt derivative instruments accounted for as hedges:

Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar) 1

Debt derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges:

Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar) 1

Bond forwards
Net carrying amount of derivatives (asset)

2,255
3,052
14,290
38

–
–
–

–
–

–
–
–
(1,500)

2,255
3,052
14,404
38

1,341
(1,473)
(92)

6,920
(8,254)

1,560
(1,601)
87

2,255
3,052
900
1

1,045
(1,146)
(92)

–
–

1,560
(1,601)
87

1 to 3
years

–
–
2,350
24

296
(327)
–

–
–

–
–
–

4 to 5
years

More than
5 years

–
–
2,442
5

–
–
–

–
–
8,712
8

–
–
–

1,392
(1,842)

5,528
(6,412)

–
–
–

–
–
–

18,135

18,237

6,061

2,343

1,997

7,836

1 Represents Canadian dollar equivalent amount of US dollar inflows matched to an equal amount of US dollar maturities in long-term debt for debt derivatives.

December 31, 2017
(In millions of dollars)

Carrying
amount

Contractual
cash flows

Less than
1 year

Bank advances
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Long-term debt
Other long-term financial liabilities
Expenditure derivative instruments:
Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar)

Equity derivative instruments
Debt derivative instruments accounted for as hedges:

Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar) 1

Debt derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges:

Cash outflow (Canadian dollar)
Cash inflow (Canadian dollar equivalent of US dollar) 1

Bond forwards
Net carrying amount of derivatives (asset)

6
1,585
2,931
14,448
9

–
–
–

–
–

–
–
–
(1,094)

6
1,585
2,931
14,555
9

1,538
(1,506)
(68)

7,417
(8,405)

956
(934)
64

6
1,585
2,931
1,756
2

1,093
(1,054)
(68)

1,435
(1,756)

956
(934)
64

1 to 3
years

–
–
–
1,800
3

445
(452)
–

–
–

–
–
–

4 to 5
years

More than
5 years

–
–
–
2,050
2

–
–
–

–
–

–
–
–

–
–
–
8,949
2

–
–
–

5,982
(6,649)

–
–
–

17,885

18,148

6,016

1,796

2,052

8,284

1 Represents Canadian dollar equivalent amount of US dollar inflows matched to an equal amount of US dollar maturities in long-term debt for debt derivatives.

Below is a summary of the net interest payments over the life of the
long-term debt,
including the impact of the associated debt
derivatives, as at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

December 31, 2018
(In millions of dollars)

Less than
1 year

1 to 3
years

4 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Net interest payments

658

1,141

913

5,923

December 31, 2017
(In millions of dollars)

Less than
1 year

1 to 3
years

4 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Net interest payments

712

1,160

908

5,409

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

121

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARKET PRICE RISK
Market price risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as
fluctuations in the market prices of our investments measured at
FVTOCI or our share price will affect our income, cash flows, or the
value of our financial instruments. The derivative instruments we use
to manage this risk are described in this note.

Below is a sensitivity analysis for significant exposures with respect
to our publicly traded investments, expenditure derivatives, short-
term borrowings, senior notes, and bank credit facilities as at
December 31, 2018 and 2017 with all other variables held
constant.
It shows how net income and other comprehensive
income would have been affected by changes in the relevant risk
variables.

Market price risk – publicly traded investments
We manage risk related to fluctuations in the market prices of our
investments in publicly traded companies by regularly reviewing
publicly available information related to these investments to
ensure that any risks are within our established levels of risk
tolerance. We do not engage in risk management practices such as
hedging, derivatives, or short selling with respect to our publicly
traded investments.

Market price risk – Class B Non-Voting Shares
Our liability related to stock-based compensation is remeasured at
fair value each period. Stock-based compensation expense is
affected by the change in the price of our Class B Non-Voting
Shares during the life of an award,
including stock options,
restricted share units (RSUs), and deferred share units (DSUs). We
use equity derivatives from time to time to manage the exposure in
our stock-based compensation liability. As a result of our equity
derivatives, a one-dollar change in the price of a Class B
Non-Voting Share would not have a material effect on net income.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
We use debt derivatives to manage risks from fluctuations in foreign
exchange rates associated with our US dollar-denominated long-
term debt and short-term borrowings. We designate the debt
derivatives related to our senior notes and senior debentures as
hedges for accounting purposes against the foreign exchange risk
associated with specific debt instruments. We have not designated
the debt derivatives related to our US CP program as hedges for
accounting purposes. We use expenditure derivatives to manage the
foreign exchange risk in our operations, designating them as hedges
for certain of our forecast operational and capital expenditures. As at
December 31, 2018, all of our US dollar-denominated long-term
debt and short-term borrowings were hedged against fluctuations in
foreign exchange rates using debt derivatives. With respect to our
long-term debt and US CP program, as a result of our debt
derivatives, a one-cent change in the Canadian dollar relative to the
US dollar would have no effect on net income.

A portion of our accounts receivable and accounts payable and
accrued liabilities is denominated in US dollars. Due to the short-
term nature of these receivables and payables, they carry no
significant risk from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates as at
December 31, 2018.

INTEREST RATE RISK
We are exposed to risk of changes in market interest rates due to
the impact
this has on interest expense for our short-term
borrowings and bank credit facilities. We were previously exposed
to risk of changes in market interest rates due to our $250 million
floating rate senior unsecured notes that were repaid in 2017. As at
December 31, 2018, 85.3% of our outstanding long-term debt and
short-term borrowings was at fixed interest rates (2017 – 89.5%).

Other
comprehensive
income

Net income

(Change in millions of dollars)

2018

2017

2018

2017

Share price of publicly traded
investments $1 change

Expenditure derivatives – change in
foreign exchange rate $0.01
change in Cdn$ relative to US$

Short-term borrowings

–

–

–

–

1% change in interest rates

17

12

14

14

8

–

9

–

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
As at December 31, 2018 and 2017, all of our US dollar-
denominated long-term debt instruments were hedged against
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for accounting purposes.

Below is a summary of our net asset (liability) position for our
various derivatives.

As at December 31, 2018

Notional
amount
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
amount
(Cdn$)

Fair
value
(Cdn$)

(In millions of dollars, except
exchange rates)

Debt derivatives accounted for

as cash flow hedges:

As assets
As liabilities

5,500
550

1.1243
1.3389

6,184
736

1,354
(22)

Short-term debt derivatives not
accounted for as hedges:

As assets

1,178

1.3276

1,564

41

Net mark-to-market debt

derivative asset

Bond forwards accounted for as

cash flow hedges:
As liabilities
Expenditure derivatives

accounted for as cash flow
hedges:

1,373

900

(87)

As assets

1,080

1.2413

1,341

122

Net mark-to-market expenditure

derivative asset

Equity derivatives not accounted

for as hedges:
As assets

Net mark-to-market asset

122

258

92

1,500

122

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

As at December 31, 2017

Notional
amount
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
amount
(Cdn$)

Fair
value
(Cdn$)

(In millions of dollars, except
exchange rates)

Debt derivatives accounted for

as cash flow hedges:

As assets
As liabilities

5,200
1,500

1.0401
1.3388

5,409
2,008

1,301
(149)

Below is a summary of the net cash proceeds (payments) on debt
derivatives.

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Proceeds on debt derivatives related to

US commercial paper

19,211

9,692

Proceeds on debt derivatives related to

credit facility borrowings

157

2,310

746

1.2869

960

(23)

Proceeds on debt derivatives related to

senior notes

1,129

Total proceeds on debt derivatives
Payments on debt derivatives related to

1,761

–

21,129

12,002

US commercial paper

(19,148)

(9,754)

–

–

900

(64)

Payments on debt derivatives related to

credit facility borrowings

(157)

(2,327)

Payments on debt derivatives related to

senior notes

Total payments on debt derivatives
Net proceeds (payments) on settlement

(1,436)

–

(20,741)

(12,081)

of debt derivatives

388

(79)

5
(44)

(39)

As assets
As liabilities

240
960

1.2239
1.2953

294
1,243

Short-term debt derivatives not
accounted for as hedges:

As liabilities

Net mark-to-market debt

derivative asset

Bond forwards accounted for as

cash flow hedges:
As liabilities
Expenditure derivatives

accounted for as cash flow
hedges:

Net mark-to-market expenditure

derivative liability

Equity derivatives not accounted

for as hedges:
As assets

–

–

276

68

Net mark-to-market asset

1,094

Below is a summary of the changes in fair value of our derivative instruments for 2018 and 2017.

Year ended December 31, 2018
(In millions of dollars)

Derivative instruments, beginning of year
Proceeds received from settlement of derivatives
Payment on derivatives settled
Increase (decrease) in fair value of derivatives

Derivative instruments, end of year

Mark-to-market asset
Mark-to-market liability

Mark-to-market asset (liability)

Year ended December 31, 2017
(In millions of dollars)

Derivative instruments, beginning of year
Proceeds received from settlement of derivatives
Payment on derivatives settled
(Decrease) increase in fair value of derivatives

Derivative instruments, end of year

Mark-to-market asset
Mark-to-market liability

Mark-to-market asset (liability)

Debt
derivatives
(hedged)

Debt
derivatives
(unhedged)

Bond
forwards

Expenditure
derivatives

Equity
derivatives

Total
instruments

1,152
(1,761)
1,436
505

1,332

1,354
(22)

1,332

(23)
(19,368)
19,305
127

41

41
–

41

(64)
–
–
(23)

(87)

–
(87)

(87)

(39)
(1,089)
1,093
157

122

122
–

122

68
(4)
–
28

92

92
–

92

1,094
(22,222)
21,834
794

1,500

1,609
(109)

1,500

Debt
derivatives
(hedged)

Debt
derivatives
(unhedged)

Bond
forwards

Expenditure
derivatives

Equity
derivatives

Total
instruments

1,683
–
–
(531)

1,152

1,301
(149)

1,152

–
(12,002)
12,081
(102)

(23)

–
(23)

(23)

(51)
–
–
(13)

(64)

–
(64)

(64)

19
(1,207)
1,240
(91)

(39)

5
(44)

(39)

8
(6)
–
66

68

68
–

68

1,659
(13,215)
13,321
(671)

1,094

1,374
(280)

1,094

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

123

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Below is a summary of the derivative instruments assets and
derivative instruments liabilities reflected on our Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position.

(In millions of dollars)

Current asset
Long-term asset

Current liability
Long-term liability

Net mark-to-market asset

As at December 31

2018

270
1,339

1,609

(87)
(22)

(109)

1,500

2017

421
953

1,374

(133)
(147)

(280)

1,094

As at December 31, 2018, US$6.1 billion notional amount of our
outstanding debt derivatives have been designated as hedges for

accounting purposes (2017 – US$6.7 billion). As at December 31,
2018, 100% of our currently outstanding bond forwards and
expenditure derivatives have been designated as hedges for
accounting purposes (2017 – 100%). In 2018, we recognized a
$10 million decrease to net
income related to hedge
ineffectiveness (2017 – $3 million increase).

Debt derivatives
We use cross-currency interest exchange agreements to manage
risks from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates associated with our
US dollar-denominated debt instruments, credit facility borrowings,
and commercial paper borrowings (see note 18). We designate the
debt derivatives related to our senior notes and debentures as
hedges for accounting purposes against the foreign exchange risk
associated with specific debt instruments. We do not designate the
debt derivatives related to our credit
facility borrowings or
commercial paper borrowings as hedges for accounting purposes.

During 2018 and 2017, we entered and settled debt derivatives related to our credit facility borrowings and US CP program as follows:

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Credit facilities

Debt derivatives entered
Debt derivatives settled
Net cash paid

Commercial paper program
Debt derivatives entered
Debt derivatives settled
Net cash received (paid)

Year ended
December 31, 2018

Year ended
December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

125
125

1.26
1.26

157
157
(1)

1,610
1,760

1.32
1.32

15,262
14,833

1.29 19,751
1.29 19,148
63

8,266
7,521

1.30
1.29

2,126
2,327
(17)

10,711
9,692
(62)

In 2018, we entered into debt derivatives to hedge the foreign
currency risk associated with the principal and interest components
of the US dollar-denominated senior notes issued on February 8,
2018 (see note 20). Below is a summary of the debt derivatives we
entered to hedge senior notes issued during 2018.

During the year,
concurrent with the issuance of our
US$750 million senior notes, we entered into debt derivatives to
convert all interest and principal payment obligations to Canadian
dollars. As a result, we received net proceeds of $938 million from
the issuance.

(In millions of
dollars, except for
coupon and
interest rates)

Effective date

Principal/
Notional
amount
(US$)

US$

Hedging effect

We did not enter or settle any debt derivatives related to senior
notes during 2017.

Fixed
hedged
(Cdn$)
interest
rate 1

Equivalent
(Cdn$)

Maturity
date

Coupon
rate

February 8, 2018

750

2048

4.300%

4.193%

938

1 Converting from a fixed US$ coupon rate to a weighted average Cdn$ fixed rate.

124

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Bond forwards
During 2018 or 2017, we did not enter or settle any bond forwards.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we determined that we would no longer be able to exercise certain ten-year bond forward
derivatives within the originally designated time frame. Consequently, we discontinued hedge accounting on those bond forward
derivatives and reclassified a $21 million loss from the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity to finance costs (recorded in “change in
fair value of derivative instruments”). We subsequently extended the bond forwards to May 31, 2019, with the ability to extend them
further and redesignated them as effective hedges.

Below is a summary of the bond forwards we have entered to hedge the underlying Government of Canada (GoC) 10-year and 30-year
rate for anticipated future debt that were outstanding as at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except interest rates)

GoC term (years)

Effective date

Maturity date 1

Notional
amount

Hedged GoC
interest rate as at
December 31, 2018

Hedged GoC
interest rate as at
December 31, 2017

10
30

Total

December 2014
December 2014

January 31, 2019
February 28, 2019

500
400

900

3.01%
2.70%

2.85%
2.65%

2018

2017

500
400

900

500
400

900

1 Bond forwards with maturity dates beyond December 31, 2018 are subject to GoC rate re-setting from time to time. Both the 10-year and 30-year bond forwards were extended

in 2018 to their respective maturity dates.

Expenditure derivatives
Below is a summary of the expenditure derivatives we entered and settled during 2018 and 2017 to manage foreign exchange risk related
to certain forecast expenditures.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Expenditure derivatives entered
Expenditure derivatives settled

Years ended December 31

2018

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

720
840

1.24
1.30

896
1,093

840
930

1.27
1.33

2017

Notional
(Cdn$)

1,070
1,240

As at December 31, 2018, we had US$1,080 million of expenditure
derivatives outstanding (2017 — US$1,200 million), at an average
rate of $1.24/US$ (2017 — $1.28/US$), with terms to maturity
ranging from January 2019 to December 2020 (2017 – January
2018 to December 2019). As at December 31, 2018, our
outstanding expenditure derivatives maturing in 2019 were
hedged at an average exchange rate of $1.24/US$.

Equity derivatives
We have equity derivatives to hedge market price appreciation risk
associated with Class B Non-Voting Shares that have been granted
under our stock-based compensation programs for stock options,
RSUs, and DSUs (see note 24). The equity derivatives were
originally entered into at a weighted average price of $50.37 with
terms to maturity of one year, extendible for further one-year
periods with the consent of the hedge counterparties. In 2018, we
executed extension agreements for each of our equity derivative
contracts under substantially the same committed terms and
conditions with revised expiry dates of April 2019 (from April 2018).
The equity derivatives have not been designated as hedges for
accounting purposes.

During 2018, we settled 0.4 million equity derivatives at a weighted
average price of $61.15 for net proceeds of $4 million. During
2017, we settled existing equity derivatives for net proceeds of

$6 million and entered into new derivatives on 1.0 million Class B
Non-Voting Shares with an expiry date of March 2018.

During 2018, we recognized a recovery, net of interest receipts, of
$33 million (2017 – $74 million recovery),
in stock-based
compensation expense related to the change in fair value of our
received payments. As at
equity derivative contracts net of
December 31, 2018, the fair value of the equity derivatives was an
asset of $92 million (2017 – $68 million asset), which is included in
current portion of derivative instruments.

As at December 31, 2018, we had equity derivatives outstanding
for 5.0 million (2017 – 5.4 million) Class B Non-Voting Shares with a
weighted average price of $51.54 (2017 – $51.44).

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, bank advances, short-term borrowings, and accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate their
fair values
because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

We determine the fair value of each of our publicly traded
investments using quoted market values. We determine the fair
value of our private investments by using implied valuations from
follow-on financing rounds, third-party sale negotiations, or market-
based approaches. These are applied appropriately to each

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

125

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

investment depending on its future operating and profitability
prospects.

The fair values of each of our public debt instruments are based on
the period-end estimated market yields, or period-end trading
values, where available. We determine the fair values of our debt
derivatives and expenditure derivatives using an estimated credit-
adjusted mark-to-market valuation by discounting cash flows to the
measurement date. In the case of debt derivatives and expenditure
derivatives in an asset position, the credit spread for the financial
institution counterparty is added to the risk-free discount rate to
determine the estimated credit-adjusted value for each derivative.
For these debt derivatives and expenditure derivatives in a liability
position, our credit spread is added to the risk-free discount rate for
each derivative.

The fair values of our equity derivatives are based on the
period-end quoted market value of Class B Non-Voting Shares.

Below is a summary of the financial instruments carried at fair value.

(In millions of dollars)

Financial assets
Investments, measured FVTOCI:

Our disclosure of the three-level fair value hierarchy reflects the
significance of the inputs used in measuring fair value:
• financial assets and financial liabilities in Level 1 are valued by
referring to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
and liabilities;

• financial assets and financial liabilities in Level 2 are valued using
inputs based on observable market data, either directly or
indirectly, other than the quoted prices;

• Level 3 valuations are based on inputs that are not based on

observable market data.

There were no material financial instruments categorized in Level 3
as at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and there were no transfers
between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 during the respective periods.

As at December 31

Carrying value

Fair value (Level 1)

Fair value (Level 2)

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

Investments in publicly traded companies

1,051 1,465

1,051

1,465

–

–

Held-for-trading:

Debt derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges
Debt derivatives not accounted for as cash flow hedges
Expenditure derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges
Equity derivatives not accounted for as cash flow hedges

Total financial assets

Financial liabilities
Held-for-trading:

1,354 1,301
–
5
68

41
122
92

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

1,354
41
122
92

1,301
–
5
68

2,660 2,839

1,051

1,465

1,609

1,374

Debt derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges
Debt derivatives not accounted for as hedges
Bond forwards accounted for as cash flow hedges
Expenditure derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges

Total financial liabilities

22
–
87
–

109

149
23
64
44

280

–
–
–
–

–

–
–
–
–

–

22
–
87
–

109

149
23
64
44

280

Below is a summary of the fair value of our long-term debt.

(In millions of dollars)

As at December 31

2018

2017

Carrying amount

Fair value 1 Carrying amount

Fair value 1

Long-term debt (including current portion)

14,290

15,110

14,448

16,134

1 Long-term debt (including current portion) is measured at Level 2 in the three-level fair value hierarchy, based on year-end trading values.

We did not have any non-derivative held-to-maturity financial assets during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

126

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTE 17: INVESTMENTS

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Investments in publicly traded and private companies
We have elected to irrevocably classify our
investments in
companies over which we do not have control or significant
influence as FVTOCI with no subsequent reclassification to net
income because we do not hold these investments with the intent
of short-term trading. We account for them as follows:
• publicly traded companies – at

fair value based on publicly

quoted prices; and

• private companies – at fair value using implied valuations from
third-party sale negotiations, or

follow-on financing rounds,
market-based approaches.

Investments in associates and joint arrangements
An entity is an associate when we have significant influence over the
entity’s financial and operating policies but do not control the
entity. We are generally presumed to have significant influence
over an entity when we hold more than 20% of the voting power.

A joint arrangement exists when there is a contractual agreement
that establishes joint control over activities and requires unanimous
consent for strategic financial and operating decisions. We classify
our interests in joint arrangements into one of two categories:
• joint ventures – when we have the rights to the net assets of the

arrangement; and

• joint operations – when we have the rights to the assets and

obligations for the liabilities related to the arrangement.

We use the equity method to account for our investments in
associates and joint ventures; we recognize our proportionate
interest in the assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses of our joint
operations.

We initially recognize our investments in associates and joint
ventures at cost and subsequently increase or decrease the
carrying amounts based on our share of each entity’s income or
loss. Distributions we receive from these entities reduce the
carrying amounts of our investments.

We eliminate unrealized gains and losses from our investments in
associates or joint ventures against our investments, up to the
amount of our interest in the entities.

Impairment in associates and joint ventures
At the end of each reporting period, we assess whether there is
objective evidence that impairment exists in our investments in
associates and joint ventures.
If objective evidence exists, we
compare the carrying amount of the investment to its recoverable
amount and recognize the excess over the recoverable amount, if
any, as a loss in net income.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

As at December 31

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

INVESTMENTS, MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Publicly traded companies
We hold a number of interests in publicly traded companies,
including Cogeco Inc. and Cogeco Communications Inc. This year,
we recognized realized losses of nil and unrealized losses of
$414 million (2017 – nil of realized losses and $418 million of
unrealized gains) with corresponding amounts
in other
comprehensive income (2017 – net
income and other
comprehensive income, respectively).

INVESTMENTS, ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES
We have (or had) interests in a number of associates and joint
ventures, some of which include:

the NHL’s Toronto Maple Leafs,

Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE)
MLSE, a sports and entertainment company, owns and operates the
Scotiabank Arena,
the NBA’s
Toronto Raptors, MLS’ Toronto FC, the CFL’s Toronto Argonauts, the
AHL’s Toronto Marlies, and other assets. We, along with BCE Inc.
(BCE), jointly own an indirect net 75% equity interest in MLSE with our
portion representing a 37.5% equity interest in MLSE. Our investment
in MLSE is accounted for as a joint venture using the equity method.

Glentel
Glentel is a large, multicarrier mobile phone retailer with several
hundred Canadian wireless retail distribution outlets. We own a
50% equity interest in Glentel, with the remaining 50% interest
owned by BCE. Our investment in Glentel is accounted for as a joint
venture using the equity method.

shomi
shomi was a joint venture equally owned by Rogers and Shaw
Communications (Shaw) and previously operated a premium
subscription video-on-demand service offering movies and television
series for viewing online and through cable set-top boxes. Our
investment in shomi was accounted for as a joint venture using the
equity method. In 2016, we announced the decision to wind down
our shomi joint venture (see note 11). In 2017, the remaining assets
associated with shomi were transferred to their respective partners
and the partnership was officially wound up.

Below is a summary of financial
significant associates and joint ventures and our portions thereof.

information pertaining to our

As at or years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

Current assets
Long-term assets
Current liabilities
Long-term liabilities

(In millions of dollars)

Investments in:

Publicly traded companies
Private companies

Investments, measured at FVTOCI
Investments, associates and joint ventures

2018

2017

Total net assets

1,051
145

1,196
938

1,465
167

1,632
929

Our share of net assets

Revenue
Expenses

Net income

Total investments

2,134

2,561

Our share of net income

2018

489
3,303
(740)
(1,258)

1,794

935

1,903
(1,902)

1

–

2017

515
3,269
(1,184)
(825)

1,775

927

1,706
(1,686)

20

14

One of our joint ventures has a non-controlling interest that has a
right to require our joint venture to purchase that non-controlling
interest at a future date at fair value.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

127

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 18: SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

Below is a summary of our
December 31, 2018 and 2017.

short-term borrowings as at

(In millions of dollars)

Accounts receivable securitization program
US commercial paper program

Total short-term borrowings

As at December 31

2018

650
1,605

2,255

2017

650
935

1,585

Below is a summary of the activity relating to our short-term borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Proceeds received from US commercial paper
Repayment of US commercial paper

Net proceeds received from US commercial paper

Proceeds received from accounts receivable securitization
Repayment of accounts receivable securitization

Net repayment of accounts receivable securitization

Net proceeds received on short-term borrowings

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

15,262
(14,858)

1.29
1.30

19,752
(19,244)

8,267
(7,530)

1.30
1.29

508

225
(225)

–

508

10,712
(9,704)

1,008

530
(680)

(150)

858

recognized as short-term borrowings. The buyer’s interest in these
trade receivables ranks ahead of our interest. The program restricts
us from using the receivables as collateral for any other purpose.
The buyer of our trade receivables has no claim on any of our other
assets.

US COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM
In 2017, we entered into a US CP program that allowed us to issue
up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of US$1 billion. In
December 2017, we increased the maximum aggregate principal
amount allowed under our US CP program to US$1.5 billion.
Funds can be borrowed under this program with terms to maturity
ranging from 1 to 397 days, subject to ongoing market conditions.
Any issuances made under the US CP program will be issued at a
discount. Borrowings under our US CP program are classified as
short-term borrowings on our Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position when they are due within one year from the date of the
financial statements.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION PROGRAM
We participate in an accounts receivable securitization program
with a Canadian financial institution that allows us to sell certain
trade receivables into the program. As at December 31, 2018, the
proceeds of the sales were committed up to a maximum of
$1,050 million (2017 – $1,050 million). Effective October 27, 2017,
we extended the term of the program to November 1, 2020.

(In millions of dollars)

Trade accounts receivable sold to

buyer as security

Short-term borrowings from buyer

Overcollateralization

As at December 31

2018

2017

1,391
(650)

741

1,355
(650)

705

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Accounts receivable securitization
program, beginning of year

Net repayment of accounts
receivable securitization

Accounts receivable securitization

program, end of year

650

–

650

800

(150)

650

We continue to service and retain substantially all of the risks and
rewards relating to the accounts receivable we sell, and therefore,
the receivables
remain recognized on our Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position and the funding received is

128

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Below is a summary of the activity relating to our long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

US commercial paper, beginning of year
Net proceeds received from US commercial paper
Discounts on issuance 1
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange 1

US commercial paper, end of year

1 Included in finance costs.

Year ended December 31, 2018 Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

746
404
27

1.25
1.26
1.33

935
508
36
126

–
737
9

–
1.37
1.33

1,178

1.36

1,605

746

1.25

–
1,008
12
(85)

935

Concurrent with the commercial paper issuances, we entered into
debt derivatives to hedge the foreign currency risk associated with
the principal and interest components of the borrowings under the

US CP program (see note 16). We have not designated these debt
derivatives as hedges for accounting purposes.

NOTE 19: PROVISIONS

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Decommissioning and restoration costs
We use network and other assets on leased premises in some of
our business activities. We expect to exit these premises in the
future and we therefore make provisions for the costs associated
with decommissioning the assets and restoring the locations to
their original conditions when we have a legal or constructive
obligation to do so. We calculate these costs based on a current
estimate of the costs that will be incurred, project those costs into
the future based on management’s best estimates of future trends
in prices, inflation, and other factors, and discount them to their
present value. We revise our forecasts when business conditions or
technological requirements change.

When we recognize a decommissioning liability, we recognize a
in property, plant and equipment and
corresponding asset
depreciate the asset based on the corresponding asset’s useful life
following our depreciation policies for property, plant and
equipment. We recognize the accretion of the liability as a charge
to finance costs on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Restructuring
We make provisions for restructuring when we have approved a
detailed and formal restructuring plan and either the restructuring
has started or management has announced the plan’s main
features to the employees affected by it. Restructuring obligations
that have uncertain timing or amounts are recognized as
provisions; otherwise they are recognized as accrued liabilities. All
charges are recognized in restructuring, acquisition and other on
the Consolidated Statements of Income (see note 9).

Onerous contracts
We make provisions for onerous contracts when the unavoidable
costs of meeting our obligation under a contract exceed the
benefits we expect to realize from it. We measure these provisions
at
the expected cost of
terminating the contract or the expected cost of continuing with
the contract. We recognize any impairment loss on the assets
associated with the contract before we make the provision.

the present value of

the lower of

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
We recognize a provision when a past event creates a legal or
constructive obligation that can be reasonably estimated and is
likely to result in an outflow of economic resources. We recognize a
provision even when the timing or amount of the obligation may
be uncertain, which can require us to use significant estimates.

JUDGMENTS
Significant judgment is required to determine when we are subject
to unavoidable costs arising from onerous contracts. These
judgments may include, for example, whether a certain promise is
legally binding or whether we may be successful in negotiations
with the counterparty.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION

(In millions of dollars)

Liabilities Other Total

Decommissioning

December 31, 2017
Additions
Adjustments to existing provisions
Reversals
Amounts used

December 31, 2018

Current (recorded in “other

current liabilities”)

Long-term

35
–
2
–
(1)

36

3
33

4
–
–
–
(1)

3

1
2

39
–
2
–
(2)

39

4
35

Decommissioning and restoration costs
Cash outflows associated with our decommissioning liabilities are
generally expected to occur at the decommissioning dates of the
assets to which they relate, which are long-term in nature. The
timing and extent of restoration work that will ultimately be
required for these sites is uncertain.

Other
Other provisions include various legal claims, which are expected
to be settled within five years.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

129

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 20: LONG-TERM DEBT

(In millions of dollars, except interest rates)

Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior debentures 1
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes
Senior notes

Deferred transaction costs and discounts
Less current portion

Total long-term debt

Due
date

2018
2019
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2023
2024
2025
2026
2032
2038
2039
2040
2041
2043
2043
2044
2048

Principal
amount

US
US

US 1,400
400
500
900
1,450
600
500
850
600
700
500
200
350
500
800
400
500
US
650
US
US 1,050
750
US

US
US
US
US

Interest
rate

6.800%
2.800%
5.380%
4.700%
5.340%
4.000%
3.000%
4.100%
4.000%
3.625%
2.900%
8.750%
7.500%
6.680%
6.110%
6.560%
4.500%
5.450%
5.000%
4.300%

As at December 31

2018

–
400
500
900
1,450
600
682
1,160
600
955
682
273
478
500
800
400
682
887
1,433
1,022

2017

1,756
400
500
900
1,450
600
627
1,066
600
878
627
251
439
500
800
400
627
816
1,318
–

14,404
(114)
(900)

14,555
(107)
(1,756)

13,390

12,692

1 Senior debentures originally issued by Rogers Cable Inc. which are unsecured obligations of RCI and for which RCCI was an unsecured guarantor as at December 31, 2018 and

2017.

Each of the above senior notes and debentures are unsecured and,
as at December 31, 2018, were guaranteed by RCCI, ranking
equally with all of RCI’s other senior notes, debentures, bank credit
facilities, and letter of credit facilities. We use derivatives to hedge

the foreign exchange risk associated with the principal and interest
components of all of our US dollar-denominated senior notes and
debentures (see note 16).

130

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

The tables below summarize the activity relating to our long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

Notional
(US$)

Exchange
rate

Notional
(Cdn$)

(In millions of dollars, except exchange rates)

Credit facility borrowings (Cdn$)
Credit facility borrowings (US$)

Total credit facility borrowings

Credit facility repayments (Cdn$)
Credit facility repayments (US$)

Total credit facility repayments

Net repayments under credit facilities

125

1.26

(125)

1.26

–
157

157

–
(157)

(157)

–

960

1.32

(1,110)

1.31

–

–

–

–

1,730
1,269

2,999

(1,830)
(1,453)

(3,283)

(284)

–

(750)
–

(750)

(750)

(1,034)

Senior note issuances (US$)

750

1.25

938

Senior note repayments (Cdn$)
Senior notes repayments (US$)

Total senior notes repayments

Net repayment of senior notes

Net repayment of long-term debt

(1,400)

1.26

–
(1,761)

(1,761)

(823)

(823)

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Long-term debt net of transaction

costs, beginning of year

Net repayment of long-term debt
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange
Deferred transaction costs incurred
Amortization of deferred transaction

costs

Long-term debt net of transaction

14,448
(823)
672
(18)

16,080
(1,034)
(608)
(3)

11

13

costs, end of year

14,290

14,448

WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATE
As at December 31, 2018, our effective weighted average interest
rate on all debt and short-term borrowings, including the effect of
all of the associated debt derivatives and bond forwards, was 4.45%
(2017 – 4.70%).

BANK CREDIT AND LETTER OF CREDIT FACILITIES
Our $3.2 billion revolving credit facility is available on a fully
revolving basis until maturity and there are no scheduled
rate charged on
to maturity. The interest
reductions prior
borrowings from the revolving credit facility ranges from nil to
1.25% per annum over the bank prime rate or base rate, or 0.85%
to 2.25% over the bankers’ acceptance rate or London Inter-Bank
Offered Rate.

In 2017, we amended our revolving credit facility to, among other
things, extend the maturity date of the original $2.5 billion facility
from September 2020 to March 2022. In addition, we added a
$700 million tranche to the facility that matures in March 2020. As a
result, the total credit limit for the facility is now $3.2 billion.

In 2018, we amended our revolving credit facility to, among other
things, extend the maturity date of the $2.5 billion tranche from
March 2022 to September 2023 and to extend the maturity date
on the $700 million tranche from March 2020 to September 2021.

In 2017, we repaid the entire balance that was outstanding under
our non-revolving bank credit facility. As a result of this repayment,
this facility was terminated.

As at December 31, 2018, we had available liquidity of $1.6 billion
(2017 – $2.3 billion) under our $4.2 billion bank and letter of credit
facilities (2017 – $3.3 billion), of which we had utilized $1.0 billion
(2017 – $0.1 billion) for letters of credit and reserved $1.6 billion to
backstop amounts outstanding under our US CP program
borrowings (2017 – $0.9 billion).

SENIOR NOTES AND DEBENTURES
We pay interest on all of our
fixed-rate senior notes and
debentures on a semi-annual basis. We paid interest on our
floating rate senior notes on a quarterly basis.

We have the option to redeem each of our fixed-rate senior notes
and debentures, in whole or in part, at any time, if we pay the
premiums specified in the corresponding agreements.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

131

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Issuance of senior notes
Below is a summary of the senior notes that we issued in 2018. We did not issue any senior notes in 2017.

(In millions of dollars, except interest rates and discounts)

Principal
amount

Due date

Interest rate

Discount/
premium at
issuance

Total gross
proceeds 1
(Cdn$)

Transaction
costs and
discounts 2
(Cdn$)

Date issued

2018 issuances

February 8, 2018

US

750

2048

4.300%

99.398%

938

16

1 Gross proceeds before transaction costs and discounts.
2 Transaction costs and discounts are included as deferred transaction costs and discounts in the carrying value of the long-term debt, and recognized in net income using the

PRINCIPAL REPAYMENTS
Below is a summary of the principal repayments on our long-term
debt due in each of the next five years and thereafter as at
December 31, 2018.

(In millions of dollars)

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Total long-term debt

900
900
1,450
600
1,842
8,712

14,404

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
As at December 31, 2018 and 2017, we were in compliance with all
financial covenants,
the terms and
conditions of our long-term debt agreements. There were no
financial leverage covenants in effect other than those under our
bank credit and letter of credit facilities.

financial ratios, and all of

two of

three specified credit

The 8.75% debentures due in 2032 contain debt incurrence tests
and restrictions on additional
investments, sales of assets, and
payment of dividends, all of which are suspended in the event the
public debt securities are assigned investment-grade ratings by at
least
rating agencies. As at
December 31, 2018, these public debt securities were assigned an
investment-grade rating by each of the three specified credit rating
agencies and, accordingly, these restrictions have been suspended
as long as the investment-grade ratings are maintained. Our other
senior notes do not have any of these restrictions, regardless of the
related credit
ratings. The repayment dates of certain debt
agreements can also be accelerated if there is a change in control
of RCI.

effective interest method.

Concurrent with the 2018 issuance, we entered into debt
derivatives to convert all interest and principal payment obligations
to Canadian dollars (see note 16).

Repayment of senior notes and related derivative settlements
Below is a summary of the repayment of our senior notes during
2018 and 2017. The associated debt derivatives for the 2018
repayment were settled at maturity. There were no debt derivatives
associated with the 2017 repayments.

(In millions of dollars)

Maturity date

2018 repayments

April 2018

2017 repayments
March 2017
June 2017

Total for 2017

Notional amount
(US$)

Notional amount
(Cdn$)

1,400

1,761

–
–

–

250
500

750

In April 2018, we repaid the entire outstanding principal amount of
our US$1.4 billion ($1.8 billion) 6.8% senior notes otherwise due in
August 2018. At the same time, the associated debt derivatives
were settled for net proceeds received of $326 million. As a result,
we repaid a net amount of $1.5 billion including settlement of the
associated debt derivatives, which was separately funded through
our US CP program and our bank credit facility. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, we recognized a $28 million loss on
repayment of long-term debt reflecting our obligation to pay
redemption premiums upon repayment (see note 10).

NOTE 21: OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

As at December 31

(In millions of dollars)

Note

2018

2017

Deferred pension liability
Supplemental executive retirement

plan

Stock-based compensation
Other

22

22
24

373

460

67
66
40

66
66
21

Total other long-term liabilities

546

613

132

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 22: POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Post-employment benefits – defined benefit pension plans
We offer contributory and non-contributory defined benefit
pension plans that provide employees with a lifetime monthly
pension on retirement.

We separately calculate our net obligation for each defined benefit
pension plan by estimating the amount of
future benefits
employees have earned in return for their service in the current and
prior years and discounting those benefits to determine their
present value.

We accrue our pension plan obligations as employees provide the
services necessary to earn the pension. We use a discount rate
based on market yields on high-quality corporate bonds at the
measurement date to calculate the accrued pension benefit
obligation. Remeasurements of
the accrued pension benefit
obligation are determined at the end of the year and include
actuarial gains and losses, returns on plan assets, and any change in
the effect of the asset ceiling. These are recognized in other
comprehensive income and retained earnings.

The cost of pensions is actuarially determined and takes into
the following assumptions and methods for pension
account
accounting related to our defined benefit pension plans:
• expected rates of salary increases for calculating increases in

future benefits;

• mortality rates for calculating the life expectancy of plan

members; and

• past service costs from plan amendments are immediately

expensed in net income.

We recognize our net pension expense for our defined benefit
pension plans and contributions to defined contribution plans as
an employee benefit expense in operating costs on the
Consolidated Statements of Income in the periods the employees
provide the related services.

Post-employment benefits – Defined Contribution Pension Plan
In 2016, we closed the defined benefit pension plans to new
members and introduced a Defined Contribution Pension Plan.
This change did not impact current defined benefit members at
the time; any employee enrolled in any of the defined benefit
pension plans at that date continues to earn pension benefits and
credited service in their respective plan.

We recognize a pension expense in relation to our contributions to
the Defined Contribution Pension Plan when the employee
provides service to the Company.

Termination benefits
We recognize termination benefits as an expense when we are
committed to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment
before the normal retirement date and it is not realistic that we will
withdraw it.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
Detailed below are the significant assumptions used in the actuarial
calculations used to determine the amount of the defined benefit
pension obligation and related expense.

Significant estimates are involved in determining pension-related
balances. Actuarial estimates are based on projections of
employees’ compensation levels at
retirement.
Retirement benefits are primarily based on career average
earnings, subject to certain adjustments. The most recent actuarial
valuations were completed as at January 1, 2018.

the time of

Principal actuarial assumptions

Weighted average of significant

assumptions:

Defined benefit obligation

Discount rate
Rate of compensation

increase

Mortality rate

Pension expense
Discount rate
Rate of compensation

increase
Mortality rate

2018

2017

3.9%
1.0% to 4.5%,
based on
employee age
CIA Private with
CPM B scale

3.7%

3.0%
CIA Private with
CPM B Scale

3.7%

4.1%

3.0%
CIA Private with
CPM B scale

3.0%
CIA Private with
CPM B Scale

Sensitivity of key assumptions
In the sensitivity analysis shown below, we determine the defined
benefit obligation for our funded plans using the same method
used to calculate the defined benefit obligation we recognize on
the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. We calculate
sensitivity by changing one assumption while holding the others
constant. This leads to limitations in the analysis as the actual
change in defined benefit obligation will likely be different from
that shown in the table, since it is likely that more than one
assumption will change at a time, and that some assumptions are
correlated.

(In millions of dollars)

Discount rate

Impact of 0.5% increase
Impact of 0.5% decrease

Rate of future compensation increase

Impact of 0.25% increase
Impact of 0.25% decrease

Mortality rate

Impact of 1 year increase
Impact of 1 year decrease

Increase (decrease) in
accrued benefit obligation

2018

2017

(196)
224

(207)
237

16
(16)

47
(50)

21
(21)

49
(52)

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

133

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
We sponsor a number of contributory and non-contributory
pension arrangements for employees, including defined benefit
and defined contributions plans. We do not provide any
non-pension post-retirement benefits. We also provide unfunded
supplemental pension benefits to certain executives.

The Rogers Defined Benefit Pension Plan provides a defined
pension based on years of service and earnings, with no increases
in retirement for inflation. The plan was closed to new members in
2016. Participation in the plan was voluntary and enrolled
employees are required to make regular contributions into the
plan. In 2009 and 2011, we purchased group annuities for our
then-retirees. Accordingly, the current plan members are primarily
active Rogers employees as opposed to retirees. An unfunded
supplemental pension plan is provided to certain senior executives
to provide benefits in excess of amounts that can be provided from
the defined benefit pension plan under the Income Tax Act
(Canada)’s maximum pension limits.

We also sponsor smaller defined benefit pension plans in addition
to the Rogers Defined Benefit Pension Plan. The Pension Plan for
Employees of Rogers Communications Inc. and the Rogers
Pension Plan for Selkirk Employees are closed legacy defined
benefit pension plans. The Pension Plan for Certain Federally
Regulated Employees of Rogers Cable Communications Inc.
is
similar to the main pension plan but only federally regulated
employees from the Cable business were eligible to participate;
this plan was closed to new members in 2016.

In addition to the defined benefit pension plans, we also provide
various defined contribution plans to certain groups of employees
of the Company and to employees hired after March 31, 2016 who
choose to join. Additionally, we provide other tax-deferred savings
including a Group RRSP and a Group TFSA
arrangements,
program, which are accounted for as deferred contribution
arrangements.

During the year, we amended certain of our defined benefit
pension plans and recognized a $43 million reduction in past
service cost this year, which was recorded as a reduction of pension
expense,
included in “operating costs” in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.

The Pension Committee of the Board oversees the administration
of our registered pension plans, which includes the following
principal areas:
• overseeing the funding, administration, communication, and

investment management of the plans;

• selecting and monitoring the performance of all third parties
including audit,

performing duties in respect of
the plans,
actuarial, and investment management services;

• proposing, considering, and approving amendments;
• proposing, considering, and approving amendments to the

Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures;

• reviewing management and actuarial

reports prepared in

respect of the administration of the pension plans; and

• reviewing and approving the audited financial statements of the

pension plan funds.

The assets of the defined benefit pension plans are held in
segregated accounts that are isolated from our assets. They are

134

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

invested and managed following all applicable regulations and the
Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures with the objective
of having adequate funds to pay the benefits promised by the plan.
Investment and market return risk is managed by:
• contracting professional

investment managers to execute the
Investment

investment strategy following the Statement of
Policies and Procedures and regulatory requirements;

• specifying the kinds of investments that can be held in the plans

and monitoring compliance;

• using asset allocation and diversification strategies; and
• purchasing annuities from time to time.

The funded pension plans are registered with the Office of the
Institutions and are subject to the
Superintendent of Financial
Federal Pension Benefits Standards Act. Two of
the defined
contribution plans are registered with the Financial Services
Commission of Ontario, subject to the Ontario Pension Benefits
Act. The plans are also registered with the Canada Revenue
Agency and are subject to the Income Tax Act (Canada). The
benefits provided under the plans and the contributions to the
plans are funded and administered in accordance with all
applicable legislation and regulations.

The defined benefit pension plans are subject to certain risks
inadequate plan surplus,
related to contribution increases,
unfunded obligations, and market
return, which we
rates of
mitigate through the governance described above. Any significant
changes to these items may affect our future cash flows.

Below is a summary of the estimated present value of accrued plan
benefits and the estimated market value of the net assets available
to provide these benefits for our funded plans.

(In millions of dollars)

Plan assets, at fair value
Accrued benefit obligations

Net deferred pension liability

Consists of:

Deferred pension asset
Deferred pension liability

Net deferred pension liability

As at December 31

2018

1,965
(2,330)

(365)

8
(373)

(365)

2017

1,890
(2,342)

(452)

8
(460)

(452)

Below is a summary of our pension fund assets.

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

Plan assets, beginning of year
Interest income
Remeasurements, recognized in other
comprehensive income and equity

Contributions by employees
Contributions by employer
Benefits paid
Administrative expenses paid from plan

assets

2018

1,890
73

(114)
39
148
(68)

(3)

2017

1,619
72

92
42
145
(76)

(4)

Plan assets, end of year

1,965

1,890

Below is a summary of the accrued benefit obligations arising from
funded obligations.

The remeasurement recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income is determined as follows:

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Accrued benefit obligations, beginning

(Loss) return on plan assets (excluding

Years ended December 31

Years ended December 31

of year

Current service cost
Past service recovery
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Contributions by employees
Remeasurements, recognized in other
comprehensive income and equity

Accrued benefit obligations, end of

2,342
143
(43)
85
(68)
39

2,006
137
–
81
(76)
42

(168)

152

interest income)

Change in financial assumptions
Change in demographic assumptions
Effect of experience adjustments

Remeasurement gain (loss), recognized
in other comprehensive income and
equity

(114)
158
(10)
20

92
(168)
–
16

54

(60)

year

2,330

2,342

Plan assets are comprised mainly of pooled funds that invest in
common stocks and bonds that are traded in an active market.
Below is a summary of the fair value of the total pension plan assets
by major category.

We also provide supplemental unfunded defined benefit pensions
to certain executives. Below is a summary of our accrued benefit
obligations, pension expense included in employee salaries and
benefits, net interest cost, remeasurements, and benefits paid.

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

(In millions of dollars)

Equity securities
Debt securities
Other – cash

Total fair value of plan assets

As at December 31

Accrued benefit obligation, beginning

2018

1,149
810
6

1,965

2017

1,134
742
14

of year

Pension expense, recognized in

employee salaries and benefits
expense

Net interest cost, recognized in finance

costs

1,890

Remeasurements, recognized in other

Below is a summary of our net pension expense. Net interest cost is
included in finance costs; other pension expenses are included in
salaries and benefits expense in operating costs on the
Consolidated Statements of Income.

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Plan cost:

Current service cost
Past service recovery
Net interest cost

Net pension expense
Administrative expense

Total pension cost recognized in net

income

143
(43)
12

112
4

116

137
–
9

146
4

150

Net interest cost, a component of the plan cost above, is included
in finance costs and is outlined as follows:

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Interest income on plan assets
Interest cost on plan obligation

Net interest cost, recognized in

finance costs

(73)
85

12

(72)
81

9

66

62

2

2

1
(4)

67

2

3

2
(3)

66

comprehensive income

Benefits paid

Accrued benefit obligation, end of year

We also have defined contribution plans with total pension
expense of $8 million in 2018 (2017 – $6 million), which is included
in employee salaries and benefits expense.

ALLOCATION OF PLAN ASSETS

Equity securities:

Domestic
International

Debt securities
Other – cash

Total

Allocation of plan assets

2018

2017

Target asset
allocation
percentage

11.8%
46.7%
41.2%
0.3%

11.8%
7% to 17%
48.1% 33% to 63%
39.3% 30% to 50%
0% to 2%

0.8%

100.0%

100.0%

Plan assets consist primarily of pooled funds that invest in common
stocks and bonds. The pooled funds have investments in our equity
securities. As a result, approximately $5 million (2017 – $7 million)
of plan assets are indirectly invested in our own securities under our
defined benefit plans.

We make contributions to the plans to secure the benefits of plan
members and invest in permitted investments using the target
ranges established by our Pension Committee, which reviews
actuarial assumptions on an annual basis.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

135

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Below is a summary of the actual contributions to the plans.

(In millions of dollars)

Employer contribution
Employee contribution

Total contribution

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

148
39

187

145
42

187

We estimate our 2019 employer contributions to our funded plans
to be $177 million. The actual value will depend on the results of

the 2019 actuarial funding valuations. The average duration of the
defined benefit obligation as at December 31, 2018 is 18 years
(2017 – 19 years).

Plan assets recognized an actual net loss of $44 million in 2018
(2017 – $160 million net return).

We have recognized a cumulative loss in other comprehensive
income and retained earnings of $384 million as at December 31,
2018 (2017 – $425 million) associated with post-retirement benefit
plans.

NOTE 23: SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CAPITAL STOCK

Share class

Preferred shares

Number of shares
authorized for issue

Features

400,000,000

• Without par value
• Issuable in series, with

Voting rights

• None

RCI Class A Voting Shares

112,474,388

rights and terms of each
series to be fixed by the
Board prior to the issue of
any series

• Without par value
• Each share can be
converted into one
Class B Non-Voting share

• Each share entitled to

50 votes

RCI Class B Non-Voting Shares

1,400,000,000

• Without par value

• None

The holders of Class A Shares are entitled to receive dividends at
the rate of up to five cents per share but only after dividends at the
rate of five cents per share have been paid or set aside on the
Class B Non-Voting Shares. Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting
Shares therefore participate equally in dividends above $0.05 per
share.

On January 24, 2019, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of
$0.50 per Class A Voting Share and Class B Non-Voting Share, to
be paid on April 1, 2019, to shareholders of record on March 12,
2019.

NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID
In April 2018, the TSX accepted a notice of our intention to
commence a normal course issuer bid (NCIB) that allows us to
purchase, during the twelve-month period ending April 23, 2019,
the lesser of 35.8 million Class B Non-Voting Shares and that
number of Class B Non-Voting Shares that can be purchased under
the NCIB for an aggregate purchase price of $500 million. We did
not repurchase any shares under the NCIB in 2018.

RCI’s Articles of Continuance under the Business Corporations Act
(British Columbia) impose restrictions on the transfer, voting, and
issue of Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares to ensure
we remain qualified to hold or obtain licences required to carry on
certain of our business undertakings in Canada. We are authorized
to refuse to register transfers of any of our shares to any person
who is not a Canadian, as defined in RCI’s Articles of Continuance,
in order to ensure that Rogers remains qualified to hold the
licences referred to above.

DIVIDENDS
We declared and paid the following dividends on our outstanding
Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares:

Date declared

Date paid

January 25, 2018
April 19, 2018
August 15, 2018
October 19, 2018

April 3, 2018
July 3, 2018
October 3, 2018
January 3, 2019

January 26, 2017
April 18, 2017
August 17, 2017
October 19, 2017

April 3, 2017
July 4, 2017
October 3, 2017
January 2, 2018

Dividend per share
(dollars)

0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

1.92

0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

1.92

136

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

NOTE 24: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Stock option plans
Cash-settled share appreciation rights (SARs) are attached to all
stock options granted under our employee stock option plan. This
feature allows the option holder to choose to receive a cash
payment equal to the intrinsic value of the option (the amount by
which the market price of the Class B Non-Voting Share exceeds
the exercise price of the option on the exercise date) instead of
exercising the option to acquire Class B Non-Voting Shares. We
classify all outstanding stock options with cash settlement features
as liabilities and carry them at their fair value, determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model or a trinomial option pricing
model, depending on the nature of the share-based award. We
remeasure the fair value of the liability each period and amortize it
to operating costs using graded vesting, either over the vesting
period or to the date an employee is eligible to retire (whichever is
shorter).

Restricted share unit (RSU) and deferred share unit (DSU) plans
We recognize outstanding RSUs and DSUs as liabilities, measuring
the liabilities and compensation costs based on the awards’ fair
values, which are based on the market price of the Class B
Non-Voting Shares, and recognizing them as charges to operating
costs over the vesting period of the awards. If an award’s fair value
changes after it has been granted and before the exercise date, we
recognize the resulting changes in the liability within operating
costs in the year the change occurs. For RSUs, the payment amount
is established as of the vesting date. For DSUs, the payment
amount is established as of the exercise date.

Employee share accumulation plan
Employees voluntarily participate in the share accumulation plan by
contributing a specified percentage of their regular earnings. We
match employee contributions up to a certain amount and
recognize our contributions as a compensation expense in the year
we make them. Expenses relating to the employee share
accumulation plan are included in operating costs.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
ESTIMATES
Significant management estimates are used to determine the fair
value of stock options, RSUs, and DSUs. The table below shows the
weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2018
and 2017 and the principal assumptions used in applying the
Black-Scholes model
for non-performance-based options and
trinomial option pricing models for performance-based options to
determine their fair value at the grant date.

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

Weighted average fair value

$

8.42

$

8.52

Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Volatility of Class B Non-Voting Shares
Weighted average expected life
Weighted average time to vest
Weighted average time to expiry
Employee exit rate
Suboptimal exercise factor
Lattice steps

1.7%
3.3%
20.1%
6.2 years
2.5 years
10.0 years
4.9%
1.4
50

0.8%
3.2%
21.2%
5.5 years
2.3 years
9.9 years
3.9%
1.4
50

Volatility has been estimated based on the actual trading statistics
of our Class B Non-Voting Shares.

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
Below is a summary of our stock-based compensation expense,
which is included in employee salaries and benefits expense.

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Years ended December 31

Stock options
Restricted share units
Deferred share units
Equity derivative effect, net of interest

receipt

Total stock-based compensation

expense

17
51
30

(33)

65

33
51
51

(74)

61

As at December 31, 2018, we had a total liability recognized at its
fair value of $252 million (2017 – $223 million) related to stock-
based compensation, including stock options, RSUs, and DSUs.
The current portion of this is $186 million (2017 – $157 million) and
is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The long-
term portion of this is $66 million (2017 – $66 million) and is
included in other long-term liabilities (see note 21).

The total intrinsic value of vested liabilities, which is the difference
between the exercise price of the share-based awards and the
trading price of the Class B Non-Voting Shares for all vested share-
based awards, as at December 31, 2018 was $112 million (2017 –
$69 million).

We paid $69 million in 2018 (2017 – $107 million) to holders of
stock options, RSUs, and DSUs upon exercise using the cash
settlement feature, representing a weighted average share price on
the date of exercise of $61.84 (2017 – $59.68).

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

137

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STOCK OPTIONS
Options to purchase our Class B Non-Voting Shares on a
one-for-one basis may be granted to our employees, directors, and
officers by the Board or our Management Compensation
Committee. There are 65 million options authorized under various
plans; each option has a term of seven to ten years. The vesting
period is generally graded vesting over four years; however, the
Management Compensation Committee may adjust the vesting
terms on the grant date. The exercise price is equal to the fair

market value of the Class B Non-Voting Shares, determined as the
five-day average before the grant date as quoted on the TSX.

Performance options
We granted 439,435 performance-based options to certain key
executives in 2018 (2017 – 489,835). These options vest on a
graded basis over four years provided that certain targeted stock
prices are met on or after each anniversary date. As at
December 31, 2018, we had 1,575,605 performance options
(2017 – 1,540,158) outstanding.

Summary of stock options
Below is a summary of the stock option plans, including performance options.

Year ended December 31, 2018

Year ended December 31, 2017

(In number of units, except prices)

Number of options

exercise price Number of options

Weighted average

Outstanding, beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding, end of year

Exercisable, end of year

2,637,890
850,700
(679,706)
(89,272)

2,719,612

1,059,590

$49.42
$58.88
$45.20
$55.94

$53.22

$46.26

3,732,524
993,740
(1,603,557)
(484,817)

2,637,890

924,562

Weighted average
exercise price

$43.70
$59.71
$42.10
$50.74

$49.42

$42.32

Below is a summary of the range of exercise prices, the weighted average exercise price and the weighted average remaining contractual
life as at December 31, 2018.

Options outstanding

Weighted average
remaining contractual
life (years)

Options exercisable

Weighted average
exercise price

Number
exercisable

Weighted average
exercise price

Range of exercise prices

$37.96 – $39.99
$40.00 – $44.99
$45.00 – $49.99
$50.00 – $59.99
$60.00 – $64.99
$65.00 – $68.10

Number
outstanding

360,248
245,052
575,064
1,011,698
489,835
37,715

2,719,612

Unrecognized stock-based compensation
at
December 31, 2018 related to stock-option plans was $8 million
(2017 – $6 million) and will be recognized in net income over the
next four years as the options vest.

expense

as

RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS
The RSU plan allows employees, directors, and officers to
participate in the growth and development of Rogers. Under the
terms of the plan, RSUs are issued to the participant and the units
issued vest over a period of up to three years from the grant date.

On the vesting date, we will redeem all of the participants’ RSUs in
cash or by issuing one Class B Non-Voting Share for each RSU. We
have reserved 4,000,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares for issue under
this plan.

Performance RSUs
We granted 263,239 performance-based RSUs to certain key
executives in 2018 (2017 – 133,559). The number of units that vest
and will be paid three years from the grant date will be within 50%

138

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

0.16
5.02
5.36
8.53
8.44
9.68

6.43

$37.96
$44.31
$48.93
$58.04
$62.82
$68.10

360,248
152,901
382,303
41,680
122,458
–

$53.22

1,059,590

$37.96
$43.97
$48.56
$56.70
$62.82
–

$46.26

to 150% of
achievement of
non-market targets.

the initial number granted based upon the
certain annual and cumulative three-year

Summary of RSUs
Below is a summary of
performance RSUs.

the RSUs outstanding,

including

Years ended December 31

(In number of units)

2018

2017

Outstanding, beginning of year
Granted and reinvested dividends
Exercised
Forfeited

1,811,845
1,217,487
(597,015)
(213,392)

2,237,085
826,081
(984,342)
(266,979)

Outstanding, end of year

2,218,925

1,811,845

Unrecognized stock-based compensation
at
December 31, 2018 related to these RSUs was $59 million (2017 –

expense

as

$41 million) and will be recognized in net income over the next
three years as the RSUs vest.

DEFERRED SHARE UNITS
The DSU plan allows directors, certain key executives, and other
to receive certain types of
senior management
compensation in DSUs. Under the terms of the plan, DSUs are
issued to the participant and the units issued cliff vest over a period
of up to three years from the grant date.

to elect

Performance DSUs
We granted 40,269 performance-based DSUs to certain key
executives in 2018 (2017 — 191,875). The number of units that vest
and may be redeemed by the holder three years from the grant
date will be within 50% to 150% of the initial number granted
based upon the achievement of certain annual and cumulative
three-year non-market targets.

Summary of DSUs
Below is a summary of
performance DSUs.

the DSUs outstanding,

including

Years ended December 31

(In number of units)

2018

2017

Outstanding, beginning of year
Granted and reinvested dividends
Exercised
Forfeited

2,327,647
131,051
(334,930)
(119,328)

2,396,458
735,117
(333,111)
(470,817)

Outstanding, end of year

2,004,440

2,327,647

NOTE 25: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
Our ultimate controlling shareholder is the Rogers Control Trust
(the Trust), which holds voting control of RCI. The beneficiaries of
the Trust are members of the Rogers family. Certain directors of RCI
represent the Rogers family.

We entered into certain transactions with private Rogers family
holding companies controlled by the Trust. These transactions
were recognized at the amount agreed to by the related parties
and are subject to the terms and conditions of formal agreements
approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. The totals received or
paid were less than $1 million for each of 2018 and 2017.

TRANSACTIONS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Key management personnel include the directors and our most
senior corporate officers, who are primarily responsible for
planning, directing, and controlling our business activities.

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

at
Unrecognized stock-based compensation
December 31, 2018 related to these DSUs was $7 million (2017 –
$22 million) and will be recognized in net income over the next
three years as the executive DSUs vest. All other DSUs are fully
vested.

expense

as

EMPLOYEE SHARE ACCUMULATION PLAN
Participation in the plan is voluntary. Employees can contribute up
to 10% of their regular earnings through payroll deductions (up to
an annual maximum contribution of $25,000). The plan
administrator purchases Class B Non-Voting Shares on a monthly
basis on the open market on behalf of the employee. At the end of
each month, we make a contribution of 25% to 50% of the
employee’s contribution that month and the plan administrator
uses this amount to purchase additional shares on behalf of the
employee. We recognize our
a
compensation expense.

contributions made as

Compensation expense related to the employee share
accumulation plan was $46 million in 2018 (2017 – $43 million).

EQUITY DERIVATIVES
We have entered into equity derivatives to hedge a portion of our
stock-based compensation expense (see note 16) and recognized
a $33 million recovery (2017 – $74 million recovery) in stock-based
compensation expense for these derivatives.

Compensation
Compensation expense for key management personnel included
in “employee salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation”
was as follows:

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

2018

2017

Salaries and other short-term employee

benefits

Post-employment benefits
Stock-based compensation 1

Total compensation

13
2
18

33

10
3
19

32

1 Stock-based compensation does not include the effect of changes in fair value of

Class B Non-Voting Shares or equity derivatives.

Transactions
We have entered into business transactions with companies whose
partners or senior officers are Directors of RCI. These directors are:
• the non-executive chairman of a law firm that provides a portion

of our legal services; and

• the chair of the board of a company that provides printing

services to the Company.

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

139

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We recognize these transactions at the amount agreed to by the
related parties, which are also reviewed by the Audit and Risk
Committee. The amounts owing are unsecured, interest-free, and
due for payment in cash within one month of the date of the
transaction. Below is a summary of related party activity for the
business transactions described above.

(In millions of dollars)

Years ended
December 31

Outstanding
balance as at
December 31

associates to transfer funds to Rogers as cash dividends or to repay
loans or advances, subject to the approval of other shareholders
where applicable.

We carried out
the following business transactions with our
associates and joint arrangements. Transactions between us and
our subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not
disclosed in this note.

Printing and legal services

13

17

–

–

Revenue
Purchases

2018

2017

2018

2017

(In millions of dollars)

Years ended December 31

2018

86
197

2017

74
198

SUBSIDIARIES, ASSOCIATES, AND JOINT ARRANGEMENTS
We have the following material operating subsidiaries as at
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
• Rogers Communications Canada Inc.; and
• Rogers Media Inc.

We have 100% ownership interest
in these subsidiaries. Our
subsidiaries are incorporated in Canada and have the same
reporting period for annual financial statements reporting.

When necessary, adjustments are made to conform the accounting
policies of the subsidiaries to those of RCI. There are no significant
restrictions on the ability of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, and

NOTE 26: GUARANTEES

We had the following guarantees as at December 31, 2018 and
2017 as part of our normal course of business:

BUSINESS SALE AND BUSINESS COMBINATION
AGREEMENTS
As part of transactions involving business dispositions, sales of
assets, or other business combinations, we may be required to pay
counterparties for costs and losses incurred as a result of breaches
of
intellectual property right
infringement, loss or damages to property, environmental liabilities,
changes in laws and regulations (including tax legislation), litigation
against the counterparties, contingent liabilities of a disposed
business, or reassessments of previous tax filings of the corporation
that carries on the business.

representations and warranties,

SALES OF SERVICES
As part of transactions involving sales of services, we may be
required to make payments to counterparties as a result of
breaches of representations and warranties, changes in laws and
regulations (including tax legislation), or litigation against
the
counterparties.

Outstanding balances at year-end are unsecured, interest-free, and
settled in cash.

(In millions of dollars)

Accounts receivable
Accounts payable and accrued

liabilities

As at December 31

2018

2017

99

20

80

26

PURCHASES AND DEVELOPMENT OF ASSETS
As part of transactions involving purchases and development of
assets, we may be required to pay counterparties for costs and
losses incurred as a result of breaches of representations and
loss or damages to property, changes in laws and
warranties,
regulations (including tax legislation), or litigation against
the
counterparties.

INDEMNIFICATIONS
We indemnify our directors, officers, and employees against claims
reasonably incurred and resulting from the performance of their
services to Rogers. We have liability insurance for our directors and
officers and those of our subsidiaries.

No amount has been accrued in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position relating to these types of indemnifications or
guarantees as at December 31, 2018 or 2017. Historically, we have
not made any significant payments under these indemnifications or
guarantees.

140

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

N
O
T
E
S

T
O
C
O
N
S
O
L
I

D
A
T
E
D
F
I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 27: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

ACCOUNTING POLICY
Contingent liabilities are liabilities of uncertain timing or amount
and are not recognized until we have a present obligation as a
result of a past event, it is probable that we will experience an
outflow of resources embodying economic benefits to settle the
obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of
the obligation.

We disclose our contingent liabilities unless the possibility of an
outflow of resources in settlement is remote.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
We are exposed to possible losses related to various claims and
lawsuits against us for which the outcome is not yet known. We
therefore make significant
in determining the
probability of loss when we assess contingent liabilities.

judgments

EXPLANATORY INFORMATION
COMMITMENTS
Below is a summary of the future minimum payments for our contractual commitments that are not recognized as liabilities as at
December 31, 2018.

(In millions of dollars)

Operating leases
Player contracts 1
Purchase obligations 2
Program rights 3

Total commitments

Less than
1 Year

208
63
448
667

1,386

1-3 Years

4-5 Years

312
8
332
1,048

1,700

172
14
202
1,079

1,467

After
5 Years

287
–
80
1,346

1,713

Total

979
85
1,062
4,140

6,266

1 Player contracts are Toronto Blue Jays players’ salary contracts into which we have entered and are contractually obligated to pay.
2 Purchase obligations are the contractual obligations under service, product, and wireless device contracts to which we have committed.
3 Program rights are the agreements into which we have entered to acquire broadcasting rights for sports broadcasting programs and films for periods in excess of one year at

contract inception.

Operating leases and other rental contracts are for network sites,
office premises, and retail outlets across the country. The majority
of the lease terms range from five to fifteen years and excludes
optional renewals. Rent expense for 2018 was $228 million (2017 –
$228 million).

Below is a summary of our other contractual commitments that are
not included in the table above.

(In millions of dollars)

Acquisition of property, plant and

equipment

Acquisition of intangible assets
Commitments related to associates and joint

ventures

Total other commitments

As at December 31

2018

244
183

383

810

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
We have the following contingent liabilities as at December 31,
2018:

System access fee – Saskatchewan
In 2004, a class action was commenced against providers of
wireless communications in Canada under the Class Actions Act
(Saskatchewan). The class action relates to the system access fee
wireless carriers charge to some of their customers. The plaintiffs
are seeking unspecified damages and punitive damages, which

would effectively be a reimbursement of all system access fees
collected.

In 2007, the Saskatchewan Court granted the plaintiffs’ application
to have the proceeding certified as a national, “opt-in” class action
where affected customers outside Saskatchewan must take specific
steps to participate in the proceeding. In 2008, our motion to stay
the proceeding based on the arbitration clause in our wireless
service agreements was granted. The Saskatchewan Court directed
that its order, in respect of the certification of the action, would
exclude customers who are bound by an arbitration clause from
the class of plaintiffs.

In 2009, counsel for the plaintiffs began a second proceeding
under the Class Actions Act (Saskatchewan) asserting the same
claims as the original proceeding. If successful, this second class
action would be an “opt-out” class proceeding. This second
proceeding was ordered conditionally stayed in 2009 on the basis
that it was an abuse of process.

At the time the Saskatchewan class action was commenced in
2004, corresponding claims were filed in multiple jurisdictions
across Canada, although the plaintiffs took no active steps. The
appeal courts in several provinces dismissed the corresponding
claims as an abuse of process. The claims in all provinces other than
Saskatchewan have now been dismissed or discontinued. We have
not recognized a liability for this contingency.

911 fee
In June 2008, a class action was launched in Saskatchewan against
providers of wireless communications services in Canada. It involves

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

141

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

allegations of breach of contract, misrepresentation, and false
advertising, among other things, in relation to the 911 fee that had
been charged by us and the other wireless telecommunication
providers in Canada. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified
damages and restitution. The plaintiffs intend to seek an order
class action in
certifying the proceeding as a national
Saskatchewan. We have not
this
contingency.

recognized a liability for

could materially change the amount of current and deferred
income tax assets and liabilities and provisions, and could,
in
certain circumstances, result in the assessment of interest and
penalties.

Other claims
There are certain other claims and potential claims against us. We
do not expect any of these, individually or in the aggregate, to have
a material adverse effect on our financial results.

of wireless

communications

Cellular devices
In July 2013, a class action was launched in British Columbia against
providers
and
manufacturers of wireless devices. The class action relates to the
alleged adverse health effects incurred by long-term users of
cellular devices. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages
and punitive damages, effectively equal to the reimbursement of
the portion of revenue the defendants have received that can
reasonably be attributed to the sale of cellular phones in Canada.
We have not recognized a liability for this contingency.

in Canada

Income taxes
We provide for income taxes based on all of the information that is
currently available and believe that we have adequately provided
for these items. The calculation of applicable taxes in many cases,
however, requires significant judgment (see note 12) in interpreting
tax rules and regulations. Our tax filings are subject to audits, which

is subject

Outcome of proceedings
the proceedings and claims against us,
The outcome of all
to future
including the matters described above,
resolution that includes the uncertainties of litigation.
It is not
possible for us to predict the result or magnitude of the claims due
to the various factors and uncertainties involved in the legal
process. Based on information currently known to us, we believe it
is not probable that
these
proceedings and claims, individually or in total, will have a material
financial
adverse effect on our business,
condition. If it becomes probable that we will be held liable for
claims against us, we will recognize a provision during the period in
which the change in probability occurs, which could be material to
Income or Consolidated
our Consolidated Statements of
Statements of Financial Position.

the ultimate resolution of any of

results, or

financial

NOTE 28: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

CHANGE IN NON-CASH OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL
ITEMS

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Years ended December 31

(In millions of dollars)

Years ended December 31

2018

2017

(In millions of dollars)

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Other current assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Contract and other liabilities

Total change in non-cash operating

working capital items

2018

2017
(restated,
see note 2)

(133)
(31)
(6)
103
(47)

(160)
17
17
9
(47)

(114)

(164)

Capital expenditures before proceeds on

disposition

Proceeds on disposition

Capital expenditures

2,815
(25)

2,790

2,510
(74)

2,436

142

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Notes

N
O
T
E
S

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

143

Glossary of selected industry terms
and helpful links

3G (Third Generation Wireless): The third
generation of mobile phone standards and
technology. A key goal of 3G standards was to
enable mobile broadband data speeds above 384
Kbps. 3G networks enable network operators to offer
users a wider range of more advanced services while
achieving greater network capacity through improved
spectral efficiency. Advanced services include video
and multimedia messaging and broadband wireless
data, all in a mobile environment.

3.5G (Enhanced Third Generation Wireless):
Evolutionary upgrades to 3G services that provide
significantly enhanced broadband wireless data
performance to enable multi-megabit data speeds.
The key 3.5G technologies in North America are
HSPA and CDMA EV-DO.

4G (Fourth Generation Wireless): A technology that
offers increased voice, video, and multimedia
capabilities, a higher network capacity, improved
spectral efficiency, and high-speed data rates over
current 3G benchmarks. Also referred to as LTE.

4.5G (Enhanced Fourth Generation Wireless):
Evolutionary upgrades to 4G services that enables
two to three times the download speeds of 4G
technology. 4.5G technology has been designed to
support virtual and augmented reality, 4K streaming,
and other emerging services.

5G (Fifth Generation Wireless): The proposed next
generation of wireless telecommunications
standards. We expect 5G technology to result in
significantly reduced latency compared to LTE,
improvements in signalling efficiency and coverage,
and the ability to connect to more devices at once
than ever before.

4K - Ultra-High Definition Video: Denotes a specific
television display resolution of 4096x2160 pixels.
1920x1080 resolution full-HD televisions present an
image of around 2 megapixels, while the 4K
generation of screens displays an 8 megapixel
image.

ABPU (Average Billings per User): This business
performance measure, expressed as a dollar rate per
month, is predominantly used in the wireless industry
to describe the average amount billed to customers
per month. ABPU is an indicator of a business’
operating performance.

ARPU (Average Revenue per User): This business
performance measure, expressed as a dollar rate per
month, is predominantly used in the wireless and
cable industries to describe the revenue generated
per customer per month. ARPU is an indicator of a
wireless or cable business’ operating performance.

AWS (Advanced Wireless Services): The wireless
telecommunications spectrum band that is used for
wireless voice, data, messaging services, and
multimedia.

Bandwidth: Bandwidth can have two different
meanings: (1) a band or block of radio frequencies
measured in cycles per second, or Hertz; or (2) an
amount or unit of capacity in a telecommunications
transmission network. In general, bandwidth is the
available space to carry a signal. The greater the
bandwidth, the greater the information-carrying
capacity.

bps (Bits per Second): A measurement of data
transmission speed used for measuring the amount
of data that is transferred in a second between two
telecommunications points or within network devices.
Kbps (kilobits per second) is thousands of bps; Mbps
(megabits per second) is millions of bps; Gbps
(gigabits per second) is billions of bps; and Tbps
(terabits per second) is trillions of bps.

Fibre Optics: A method for the transmission of
information (voice, video, or data) in which light is
modulated and transmitted over hair-thin filaments of
glass called fibre optic cables. The bandwidth
capacity of fibre optic cable is much greater than that
of copper wire and light can travel relatively long
distances through glass without the need for
amplification.

Broadband: Communications service that allows for
the high-speed transmission of voice, data, and video
simultaneously at rates of 1.544 Mbps and above.

Bundling: Refers to the coupling of independent
products or services offered into one retail package.

BYOD (Bring Your Own Device): Refers to the action
that customers are able to sign up for wireless
services on a personally purchased device, as
opposed to the traditional means of acquiring one
through a term contract.

Cable Telephony (Phone): The transmission of real-
time voice communications over a cable network.

Churn: This business performance measure is used
to describe the disconnect rate of customers to a
telecommunications service. It is a measure of
customer turnover and is often at least partially
reflective of service quality and competitive intensity. It
is usually expressed as a percentage and calculated
as the number of subscriber units disconnecting in a
period divided by the average number of units on the
network in the same period.

CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier): A
telecommunications provider company that
competes with other, already established carriers,
generally the ILEC.

Cloud Computing: The ability to run a program or
application on many connected computers
simultaneously as the software, data, and services
reside in data centres.

CPE (Customer Premise Equipment):
Telecommunications hardware, such as a modem or
set-top box, that is located at the home or business of
a customer.

CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and
Telecommunications Commission): The federal
regulator for radio and television broadcasters and
cable TV and telecommunications companies in
Canada.

Data Centre: A facility used to house computer
systems and associated components, such as
telecommunications and storage systems. It generally
includes redundant or backup power supplies,
redundant data communications connections,
environmental controls (e.g., air conditioning, fire
suppression), and security controls.

DOCSIS (Data Over Cable Service Interface
Specification): A non-proprietary industry standard
developed by CableLabs that allows for equipment
interoperability from the headend to the CPE. The
latest version (DOCSIS 3.1) enables bonding of
multiple channels to allow for download speeds up
to 10 Gbps and upload speeds up to 2 Gbps,
depending upon how many channels are bonded
together.

FTTH (Fibre-to-the-Home)/FTTP (Fibre-to-the-
Premise): Represents fibre optic cable that reaches
the boundary of the home or premise, such as a box
on the outside wall of a home or business.

GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications):
A TDMA-based technology and a member of the
“second generation” (2G) family of mobile protocols
that is deployed widely around the world, especially
at the 850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz frequency
bands.

HDR (High Dynamic Range): An imaging technique
used to reproduce a greater dynamic range of
luminosity than is possible with standard digital
imaging or photographic techniques.

Hertz: A unit of frequency defined as one cycle per
second. It is commonly used to describe the speeds
at which electronics are driven in the radio industry.
MHz (megahertz) is millions of hertz; GHz (gigahertz)
is billions of hertz; and THz is trillions of hertz.

Homes Passed: Total number of homes that have the
potential for being connected to a cable system in a
defined geographic area.

Hosting (Web Hosting): The business of housing,
serving, and maintaining files for one or more
websites or e-mail accounts. Using a hosting service
allows many companies to share the cost of a high-
speed Internet connection for serving files, as well as
other Internet infrastructure and management costs.

Hotspot: A Wi-Fi access point in a public place, such
as a café, train station, airport, commercial office
property, or conference centre.

HSPA (High-Speed Packet Access): HSPA is an
IP-based packet-data enhancement technology that
provides high-speed broadband packet data services
over 3G networks. HSPA+ provides high-speed
broadband packet data services at even faster speeds
than HSPA over 4G networks.

HUP (Hardware Upgrade): The act of an existing
wireless customer upgrading to a new wireless
device.

Hybrid Fibre-Coaxial Network Architecture (HFC): A
technology in which fibre optic cable and coaxial
cable are used in different portions of a network to
carry broadband content (such as video, voice, and
data) from a distribution facility to a subscriber
premise.

ILEC (Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier): The
dominant telecommunications company providing
local telephone service in a given geographic area
when competition began. Typically, an ILEC is the
traditional phone company and the original local
exchange carrier in a given market.

IoT (Internet of Things): The concept of connecting
everyday objects and devices (e.g., appliances and
cellular phones) to the Internet and each other. This
allows them to sense their environment and
communicate between themselves, allowing for the
seamless flow of data.

BDU (Broadcast Distribution Undertaking): An
undertaking for the reception of broadcasting and
the retransmission thereof by radio waves or other
means of telecommunication to more than one
permanent or temporary residence or dwelling unit
or to another such undertaking.

DSL (Digital Subscriber Line): A family of broadband
technologies that offers always-on, high-bandwidth
(usually asymmetrical) transmission over an existing
twisted-pair copper telephone line. DSL shares the
same phone line as the telephone service but uses a
different part of the phone line’s bandwidth.

144

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

IP (Internet Protocol): The packet-based computer
network protocol that all machines on the Internet
must know so they can communicate with one
another. IP is a set of data switching and routing rules
that specify how information is cut up into packets
and how they are addressed for delivery between
computers.

IPTV (Internet Protocol Television): A system where
a digital television signal is delivered using IP. Unlike
broadcasting, viewers receive only the stream of
content they have requested (by surfing channels or
ordering video on demand).

ISED Canada (Innovation, Science and Economic
Development Canada): The Canadian federal
government department responsible for, amongst
other things, the regulation, management, and
allocation of radio spectrum and establishing
technical requirements for various wireless systems.

ISP (Internet Service Provider): A provider of Internet
access service to consumers and/or businesses.

LAN (Local Area Network): A network created via
linked computers within a small area, such as a single
site or building.

LTE (Long-Term Evolution): A fourth generation
cellular wireless technology (also known as 4G) that has
evolved and enhanced the UMTS/HSPA+ mobile
phone standards. LTE improves spectral efficiency,
lowers costs, improves services, and, most importantly,
allows for higher data rates. LTE technology is designed
to deliver speeds up to 300 Mbps.

LTE Advanced: A mobile communication standard
that represents a major enhancement of the LTE
standard. With a peak data rate of 1 Gbps, LTE
Advanced also offers faster switching between power
states and improved performance at the cell edge.

M2M (Machine-to-Machine): The wireless inter-
connection of physical devices or objects that are
seamlessly integrated into an information network to
become active participants in business processes.
Services are available to interact with these ‘smart
objects’ over the Internet, query, change their state,
and capture any information associated with them.

MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator): A
wireless communications service provider that does
not own the wireless network infrastructure through
which it provides services to its customers.

Near-net: Customer location(s) adjacent to network
infrastructure allowing connectivity to the premises to
be extended with relative ease.

Off-net: Customer location(s) where network
infrastructure is not readily available, necessitating the
use of a third-party leased access for connectivity to
the premises.

On-net: Customer location(s) where network
infrastructure is in place to provide connectivity to the
premises without further builds or third-party leases.
An on-net customer can be readily provisioned.

OTT (Over-the-Top): Audio, visual, or alternative
media distributed via the Internet or other
non-traditional media.

Penetration: The degree to which a product or
service has been sold into, or adopted by, the base of
potential customers or subscribers in a given
geographic area. This value is typically expressed as a
percentage.

POPs (Persons of Population): A wireless industry
term for population or number of potential
subscribers in a market, a measure of the market size.
A POP refers to one person living in a population
area, which, in whole or in substantial part, is included
in the coverage areas.

Postpaid: A conventional method of payment for
wireless service where a subscriber pays a fixed
monthly fee for a significant portion of services.
Usage (e.g. long distance) and overages are billed in
arrears, subsequent to consuming the services. The
fees are often arranged on a term contract basis.

Prepaid: A method of payment for wireless service
that requires a subscriber to prepay for a set amount
of airtime or data usage in advance of actual usage.
Generally, a subscriber’s prepaid account is debited
at the time of usage so that actual usage cannot
exceed the prepaid amount until an additional
prepayment is made.

PVR (Personal Video Recorder): A consumer
electronics device or application software that records
video in a digital format. The term includes set-top
boxes with direct-to-disk recording capabilities, which
enables video capture and playback to and from a
hard disk.

Set-Top Box: A standalone device that receives and
decodes programming so that it may be displayed
on a television. Set-top boxes may be used to receive
broadcast, cable, and satellite programming.

Spectrum: A term generally applied to
electromagnetic radio frequencies used in the
transmission of sound, data, and video. Various
portions of spectrum are designated for use in
cellular service, television, FM radio, and satellite
transmissions.

SVOD (Subscription Video-on-Demand): Refers to a
service that offers, for a monthly charge, access to
specific programming with unlimited viewing on an
on-demand basis.

TPIA (Third-Party Internet Access): Wholesale high-
speed access services of large cable carriers that
enable independent service providers to offer retail
Internet services to their own end-users.

TSU (Total Service Unit): In the cable TV industry, this
typically refers to television, Internet, and cable
telephony subscribers. A subscriber that has
purchased television and Internet services is counted
as two TSUs. A subscriber that has purchased
television, Internet, and cable telephony services is
counted as three TSUs, etc.

VOD (Video-on-Demand): A cable service that allows
a customer to select and view movies and shows at
any time from a library of thousands of titles.

VoIP (Voice over IP): The technology used to
transmit real-time voice conversations in data packets
over a data network using IP. Such data networks
include telephone company networks, cable TV
networks, wireless networks, corporate intranets, and
the Internet.

VoLTE (Voice over LTE): A platform to provide voice
services to wireless customers over LTE wireless
networks. The LTE standard only supports packet
switching, as it is all IP-based technology. Voice calls
in GSM are circuit switched, so with the adoption of
LTE, carriers are required to re-engineer their voice
call network, while providing continuity for traditional
circuit-switched networks on 2G and 3G networks.

Wi-Fi: The commercial name for a networking
technology standard for wireless LANs that essentially
provide the same connectivity as wired networks, but
at lower speeds. Wi-Fi allows any user with a
Wi-Fi-enabled device to connect to a wireless access
point.

Helpful links

Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications
Commission (CRTC)
The CRTC is an independent public organization that
regulates and supervises the Canadian broadcasting
and telecommunications systems. It reports to
Parliament through the Minister of Canadian
Heritage. www.crtc.gc.ca

Innovation, Science and Economic Development
Canada (ISED Canada)
ISED Canada is a ministry of the federal government
whose mission is to foster a growing, competitive,
knowledge-based Canadian economy. It also works
with Canadians throughout the economy and in all
parts of the country to improve conditions for
investment, improve Canada’s innovation
performance, increase Canada’s share of global
trade, and build an efficient and competitive
marketplace. www.ic.gc.ca

Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
The FCC is an independent United States
government agency. The FCC was established by the
Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with
regulating interstate and international
communications by radio, television, wire, satellite,
and cable. The FCC’s jurisdiction covers the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.
www.fcc.gov

Canadian Wireless Telecommunications
Association (CWTA)
The CWTA is the industry trade organization and
authority on wireless issues, developments, and
trends in Canada. It represents wireless service
providers as well as companies that develop and
produce products and services for the industry,
including handset and equipment manufacturers,
content and application creators, and
business-to-business service providers. www.cwta.ca

The Wireless Association (CTIA)
The CTIA is an international non-profit membership
organization, founded in 1984, representing wireless
carriers and their suppliers, as well as providers and
manufacturers of wireless data services and products.
The CTIA advocates on their behalf before all levels of
government. www.ctia.org

GSM Association (GSMA)
The GSMA is a global trade association representing
nearly 800 operators with more than 300 companies
in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset
and device makers, software companies, equipment
providers, and Internet companies, as well as
organizations in adjacent industry sectors. In addition,
more than 180 manufacturers and suppliers support
the Association’s initiatives as associate members.
The GSMA works on projects and initiatives that
address the collective interests of the mobile industry,
and of mobile operators in particular.
www.gsma.com

Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television
Services (CCTS)
An independent organization dedicated to working
with consumers and service providers to resolve
complaints about telephone, television, and Internet
services. Its structure and mandate were approved by
the CRTC. www.ccts-cprst.ca

For a more comprehensive glossary
of industry and technology terms,
go to rogers.com/glossary

2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.

|

145

Corporate and shareholder information

CORPORATE OFFICES
Rogers Communications Inc.
333 Bloor Street East,
Toronto, ON M4W 1G9
416.935.7777

CUSTOMER SERVICE AND
PRODUCT INFORMATION
888.764.3771 or rogers.com

SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
If you are a registered shareholder and have inquiries
regarding your account, wish to change your name or
address, or have questions about lost stock
certificates, share transfers, estate settlements or
dividends, please contact our transfer agent and
registrar:

AST Trust Company (Canada)
P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B
Montreal, QC H3B 3K3, Canada
416.682.3860 or 800.387.0825
inquiries@astfinancial.com

Duplicate Mailings
If you receive duplicate shareholder mailings from
Rogers Communications, please contact AST Trust
Company (Canada) as detailed above to consolidate
your accounts.

INVESTOR RELATIONS
Institutional investors, securities analysts and others
requiring additional financial information can visit
investors.rogers.com or contact us at:

647.435.6470 or
416.935.7777 (outside North America)
or investor.relations@rci.rogers.com

CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY
For information relating to Rogers’ various
philanthropic endeavours, refer to the “About
Rogers” section of rogers.com

SUSTAINABILITY
Rogers is committed to continuing to grow
responsibly and we focus our social and
environmental sustainability efforts where we can
make the most meaningful impacts on both. To learn
more, please visit rogers.com/csr

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTINGS
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX):
RCI.A – Class A Voting shares
(CUSIP # 775109101)
RCI.B – Class B Non-Voting shares
(CUSIP # 775109200)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE):
RCI – Class B Non-Voting shares
(CUSIP # 775109200)

DEBT SECURITIES
For details of the public debt securities of the Rogers
companies, please refer to the “Debt Securities”
section under investors.rogers.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
KPMG LLP

ON-LINE INFORMATION
Rogers is committed to open and full financial
disclosure and best practices in corporate
governance. We invite you to visit
investors.rogers.com where you will find additional
information about our business, including events and
presentations, news releases, regulatory filings,
governance practices, corporate social responsibility
and our continuous disclosure materials, including
quarterly financial releases, annual information forms,
and management information circulars. You may also
subscribe to our news by email or RSS feeds to
automatically receive Rogers news releases
electronically.

DIRECT DEPOSIT SERVICE
Shareholders may have dividends deposited directly
into accounts held at financial institutions. To arrange
direct deposit service, please contact AST Trust
Company (Canada) as detailed earlier on this page.

COMMON STOCK TRADING AND
DIVIDEND INFORMATION

Price RCI.B on TSX

2018

High

Low Close

Dividends
Declared
per Share

First Quarter
$59.31 $55.63 $57.54
Second Quarter $63.02 $60.54 $62.44
$68.68 $65.89 $66.43
Third Quarter
$72.45 $68.03 $69.96
Fourth Quarter

$0.48
$0.48
$0.48
$0.48

Shares Outstanding at December 31,
2018
Class A Voting
Class B Non-Voting

111,155,637
403,657,038

2019 Expected Dividend Dates
Record Date*:

Payment Date*:

March 12, 2019
June 10, 2019
September 9, 2019
December 11, 2019

* Subject to Board approval

April 1, 2019
July 2, 2019
October 1, 2019
January 2, 2020

Unless indicated otherwise, all dividends paid by
Rogers Communications are designated as “eligible”
dividends for the purposes of the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and any similar provincial legislation.

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (DRIP)
Rogers offers a convenient dividend reinvestment
program for eligible shareholders to purchase
additional Rogers Communications shares by
reinvesting their cash dividends without incurring
brokerage fees or administration fees. For plan
information and enrolment materials or to learn more
about Rogers’ DRIP, please visit https://ca.astfinancial.
com/InvestorServices/Search-DRIP or contact AST
Trust Company (Canada) as detailed earlier on this
page.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF
SHAREHOLDER MATERIALS
Registered shareholders can receive electronic notice
of financial reports and proxy materials by registering
at https://ca.astfinancial.com/edelivery. This
approach gets information to shareholders faster
than conventional mail and helps Rogers protect the
environment and reduce printing and postage costs.

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND OTHER RISKS
This annual report includes forward-looking statements about the financial condition and
prospects of Rogers Communications that involve significant risks and uncertainties that are
detailed in the “Risks and Uncertainties Affecting our Business” and “About Forward-Looking
Information” sections of the MD&A contained herein, which should be read in conjunction with
all sections of this annual report.

Facebook
facebook.com/rogers

Twitter
@rogers

LinkedIn
linkedin.com/company/
rogers-communications

The fibre used in the manufacture of the stock comes from well-managed forests,
controlled sources, and recycled wood or fibre.

This annual report
is recyclable

2,373 litres
of water saved

19 kg
solid waste
not created

52 kg CO2 of
net greenhouse
gases prevented

1,000,000 BTUs
energy not
consumed

© 2018 Rogers Communications Inc.
Other registered trademarks that appear are the property of the respective owners.

146

| ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT

The best is yet to come.

12

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   2018 ANNUAL REPORT