Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Gold / Royal Gold

Royal Gold

rgld · NASDAQ Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker rgld
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Gold
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2020 Annual Report · Royal Gold
Loading PDF…
SUCCESS THROUGH 
SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP

DENVER, COLORADO2020 ANNUAL REPORTPORTFOLIO — DIVERSE, GOLD FOCUSED

PRINCIPAL
PROPERTIES
ANDACOLLO
1
Region IV, Chile
CORTEZ
Nevada, USA
MOUNT MILLIGAN
British Columbia, Canada
PEÑASQUITO
Zacatecas, Mexico

4

3

2

6

7

5

6

7

PUEBLO VIEJO
Sanchez Ramirez, 
Dominican Republic
WASSA
Western Region, Ghana

KHOEMACAU
Botswana

3

2

4

5

1

187PROPERTIES1

41 PRODUCING
16 DEVELOPMENT
49 EVALUATION
81 EXPLORATION
1  As of June 30, 2020

REVENUE* BY COMMODITY

REVENUE* BY COUNTRY

CUMULATIVE FIVE YEAR RETURN GRAPH**

3%
Other

9%
Copper

9%
Silver

79%
Gold

3%
Australia

7%
Mexico

6%
Africa

10%
USA

15%
Chile

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

2%
Other

38%
Canada

19%
Dom. Rep

$192
$185

$147

June '15

June '16

June '17

June '18

June '19

June '20

Royal Gold, Inc.

S&P500 Index

PHLX Gold/Silver Sector

*  Total Revenue for FY 2020

**  Returns have been indexed to June 30, 2015

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

REVENUE
For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30
($ Millions)

OPERATING CASH FLOWS
For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30
($ Millions)

CALENDAR YEAR DIVIDENDS1
($ per share)

440.8

459.0

423.1

498.8

359.8

328.8

340.8

266.9

253.2

1.06

1.00

1.12

0.92

0.96

169.3

'16

'17

'18

'19

'20

'16

'17

'18

'19

'20

'16

'17

'18

'19

'20

1  Dividends are paid on a calendar year basis. The dividend for calendar year 2020 is $1.12; dividends declared during fiscal year 

2020 totaled $1.105.

MESSAGE FROM OUR PRESIDENT AND CHIEF 
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS,

I was appointed as President and 
CEO on January 2, 2020, and while 
2020 has been a challenging year 
for many people around the world 
in many respects, I am pleased to 
report that Royal Gold’s business 
continues to thrive. 

As businesses have grappled 
with the social and economic 
challenges caused by a global 
pandemic, Royal Gold stayed true 
to long-held strategic objectives. 
We have maintained our focus on 
gold, remained disciplined with 
our allocation of capital, managed 
our balance sheet prudently, and 
continued to return capital to 
shareholders. Our commitment to 
a long-term and proven strategy 
allowed us to navigate an uncertain 
operating environment and 
produce record financial results for 
fiscal 2020.

We benefited as precious metals 
prices increased and our diversified 
portfolio of precious metal assets 
produced record operating 
cash flow in 2020. While we are 
pleased to see metal prices rise, 
we are also careful to consider 
long term returns and we will 
remain disciplined with respect 
to completing new acquisitions. 
Our portfolio includes a pipeline 
of earlier stage assets that are not 
yet cash-flowing, and higher metal 
prices may support production 
and reserve increases that will 
provide organic revenue growth in 
the future without any significant 
investment on our part. 

True to our history, we remain 
focused on measuring success on a 
per share basis and limiting equity 
dilution. While we have seen many 
other companies in the precious 
metals sector take advantage of 
renewed capital inflows, we have 
avoided dilutive equity issuances 
to provide our shareholders with 
as much exposure to our business 
as possible. 

COMPANY PERFORMANCE

Fiscal 2020 saw exceptional 
financial performance, and we 
recognized records for revenue of 
$498.8 million, operating cash flow 
of $340.8 million, and earnings 
of $199.3 million. Our portfolio 
performed well, with gold equivalent 
volume1 of 320,000 ounces, and 
benefited from significantly higher 
gold and silver prices.

During the year we experienced 
interruptions in the portfolio 
including a two-month strike at 
Andacollo, a one-month blockade 
of Peñasquito, and production 
curtailments and temporary 
stoppages at several assets due to 
actions taken by the operators to 
combat the spread of COVID-19. 
Despite these operational issues, 
the strength and diversity of our 
portfolio was evident as the overall 
gold equivalent volume1 was less 
than five percent lower than the 
previous year. 

1 

See page A-2 at the end of this document for additional information about gold 
equivalent ounces. 

Our commitment to a long-term 
and proven strategy allowed us to 
navigate an uncertain operating 
environment and produce record 
financial results for fiscal 2020.

1

2020 ANNUAL REPORTIN 2020 WE ACHIEVED NEW RECORDS 
FOR REVENUE OF

$498.8 million

OPERATING CASH FLOW OF

$340.8 million

AND EARNINGS OF

$199.3 million

Our new senior management team 
has made a seamless transition 
and we stand ready to build on the 
company’s success.

CAPITAL ALLOCATION PRIORITIES

Disciplined capital allocation is a key 
attribute of our approach to business, 
and our significant free cash flow2 
during the year allowed us to:

•  reduce net debt2 by $115 million 
and end the year with a net cash2 
position of $14 million;

•  fund approximately $136 million 

in advance payments towards our 
silver stream at the Khoemacau 
project, which we expect will 
provide a near-term contribution 
to the portfolio when it begins 
production in calendar 2021; and

•  maintain our commitment to 

paying a growing and sustainable 
dividend, which we raised for the 
19th consecutive year to $1.12 per 
share per calendar year, with a 
total of $71.5 million paid back to 
shareholders during the year.

We funded all these activities without 
issuing additional equity and ended 
the year with a strong balance 
sheet and access to liquidity that 
positions us to act on new business 
opportunities as they arise.

LEADERSHIP TRANSITION

A significant strategic achievement 
during the year was our transition 
to a new generation of leadership 
within the company.  In addition 
to my appointment, Paul Libner, 
Chief Financial Officer and 
Treasurer, and Randy Shefman, 
Vice President and General Counsel, 
were promoted from within our 
organization as we implemented 
long standing succession 
planning strategies.  Additionally, 
Mark Isto was promoted to Executive 
Vice President and Chief Operating 
Officer in recognition of his 

contribution to our long standing 
commitment to technical excellence 
in our due diligence and asset 
monitoring efforts.  Our new senior 
management team, which consists 
of individuals with long careers with 
Royal Gold, has made a seamless 
transition and we stand ready to 
build on the company’s success.

During the year, our previous 
President and CEO, Tony Jensen, and 
Vice President General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary, Bruce Kirchhoff, 
decided to retire from Royal Gold.  
These individuals were long standing 
and respected leaders in our 
organization and I believe I speak for 
everyone at Royal Gold as I thank 
them for their dedicated service over 
the years.

In addition, I would like to thank the 
employees of Royal Gold, who have 
successfully navigated the personal 
and corporate challenges of working 
in a COVID 19 environment and have 
ensured the smooth operation of our 
business, even in these trying times.

We have built our business to appeal 
to investors who want exposure 
to precious metals through a 
conservatively managed vehicle. Our 
success this year demonstrates that 
this approach continues to work.

I appreciate the opportunity to 
lead Royal Gold in its next phase 
of development and I value the 
continued support of the Board and 
management team. I look forward to 
continuing to earn your support into 
the future.

Sincerely,

William Heissenbuttel

Free cash flow and net debt (cash) are non-GAAP financial measures.  See pages A-1 
and A-2 at the end of this document for additional information.

2 

2

ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
ESG HIGHLIGHTS

Royal Gold’s business model is designed to provide shareholders with long-term exposure to resource upside and 
metal price optionality for the life of a mining project. We understand that sustained economic performance cannot 
be obtained without sound environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices.  As such, the sustainability of our 
investments is fundamental to our long-term success.

COMMUNITY SUPPORT
We believe that “good mines get better” through 
expansion, resource conversion and technological 
advancements.  However, all operations will eventually 
come to an end and the impacts of mine closure are felt 
not only by the workforce and investors, but also by the 
local community.  We actively seek opportunities to work 
with our operating partners to advance sustainability 
initiatives with the goal of aiding communities to thrive 
both during mining operations and beyond.  We also 
believe in supporting the education of the industry’s next 
generation of leadership who will be at the forefront 
of the continued evolution of responsible resource 
development and sustainability standards.

We also believe in giving back at home, supporting 
the communities where we live and work.  Our annual 
charitable giving is administered by a committee of 
employees that selects donation targets and recipients 
in our local communities.  We are proud to partner 
with leading charities in Denver, Luzern, Toronto and 
Vancouver who are actively responding to community 
needs with respect to medical supplies, homelessness, 
food security, elder care, and education.

SUSTAINABILITY
Royal Gold endorses the International Council on 
Mining and Metals’ (ICMM) 10 Principles of Sustainable 
Development and participated in implementation of 
the World Gold Council’s Responsible Gold Mining 
Principles (RGMPs), each of which promote ethical and 
sustainable resource development.

We integrate these principles into Royal Gold’s own 
business planning and operations as appropriate and 
encourage our operating partners, whom we consider 
to be members of our supply chain, to adhere to 
these or similar principles in their own management 
and operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
With fewer than 30 employees across four professional 
offices in United States, Switzerland, and Canada, 
Royal Gold’s direct environmental footprint is modest, 
although we strive to limit this impact to the extent 
possible.  We subsidize and encourage employees' use 
of public transportation for their daily commute, and 
in January 2020, we moved our Denver headquarters, 
where two-thirds of our employees are based, into a 
LEED Gold certified building.  Also in 2020, we eliminated 
single use plastic water bottles across all of our offices.

While we have limited influence over the mining 
operations in which we hold stream and royalty 
interests, we encourage our operators to implement 
industry best practices for emissions reduction.  In 2020, 
we joined with leading mining companies to sponsor 
the Colorado Cleantech Industry Association’s Mining 
Cleantech Challenge, an industry judged competition to 
promote new clean technologies for mining projects.

3

2020 ANNUAL REPORT 
THE ROYAL GOLD BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

William Hayes
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Non-Executive Chair of Royal 
Gold, Inc.; retired Executive 
Vice President for Project 
Development and Corporate 
Affairs for Placer Dome Inc.

William Heissenbuttel
INSIDE DIRECTOR 
President and Chief Executive 
Officer of Royal Gold, Inc.

Kevin McArthur 
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Retired Executive Chairman 
and Chief Executive Officer of 
Tahoe Resources Inc.

Jamie Sokalsky 
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Retired Director and President 
and Chief Executive Officer of 
Barrick Gold Corporation

Christopher Thompson*
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Retired Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer of Gold 
Fields Limited

Ronald Vance 
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Retired Senior Vice President, 
Corporate Development for 
Teck Resources Limited

Sybil Veenman 
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR 
Retired General Counsel for 
Barrick Gold Corporation

*  Christopher Thompson has informed the Board of Directors that he does not intend to stand for  

reelection to the board at the November 2020 shareholders’ meeting.

THE ROYAL GOLD MANAGEMENT TEAM

William Heissenbuttel 
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF 
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Paul Libner 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
AND TREASURER

Mark Isto 
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 
AND CHIEF OPERATING 
OFFICER, ROYAL GOLD CORP.

Randy Shefman 
VICE PRESIDENT AND 
GENERAL COUNSEL

Daniel Breeze 
VICE PRESIDENT, 
CORPORATE 
DEVELOPMENT, 
RGLD GOLD AG

Jason Hynes
VICE PRESIDENT, BUSINESS  
DEVELOPMENT AND 
STRATEGY, 
ROYAL GOLD CORP.

Alistair Baker
VICE PRESIDENT, INVESTOR 
RELATIONS AND BUSINESS 
DEVELOPMENT,  
ROYAL GOLD CORP.

Margaret McCandless
ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL, 
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER, 
AND CORPORATE SECRETARY

FORM 10-K 2020UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
Form 10-K 

(Mark One)   
☒ 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 

or 

☐ 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From                                                    to                                                   

Commission File Number 001-13357 
Royal Gold, Inc. 
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) 

Delaware 
(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization) 
1144 15th Street, Suite 2500 
Denver, Colorado 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 

84-0835164 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.) 

80202 
(Zip Code) 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (303) 573-1660 

Title of Each Class 
Common Stock, $0.01 par value 

Trading Symbol 
RGLD 

Name of the Exchange on which Registered 
Nasdaq Global Select Market 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒    No ☐ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐    No ☒ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒   
No ☐ 
Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  every  Interactive  Data  File  required  to  be  submitted  pursuant  to  Rule 405  of  Regulation S-T 
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒    No ☐ 
Indicate by check  mark  whether the  registrant is  a large accelerated  filer, an accelerated filer,  a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth 
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange 
Act.   

Large accelerated filer ☒ 
Non-accelerated filer ☐    
Emerging growth company ☐ 

Accelerated filer ☐ 
Smaller reporting company ☐ 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial 
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial 
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐    No ☒ 
Aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of Royal Gold common stock on December 31, 
2019, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $8.0 billion. There were 65,591,043 shares of Royal Gold common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as 
of July 30, 2020. 

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on November 18, 2020, and to be filed within 120 days after June 30, 2020, 
are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEX 

     PAGE 

2
7
15
15
28
28

28
28
29
39
40
72
72
73

74
74

74
74
74

74
80
81

  Business 

PART I. 
ITEM 1. 
ITEM 1A.   Risk Factors 
ITEM 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments 
ITEM 2. 
ITEM 3. 
ITEM 4. 
PART II.   
ITEM 5. 

  Properties 
  Legal Proceedings 
  Mine Safety Disclosure 

  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of 

Equity Securities 

  Selected Financial Data 
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 

ITEM 6. 
ITEM 7. 
ITEM 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 
ITEM 8. 
ITEM 9. 
ITEM 9A.   Controls and Procedures 
ITEM 9B.   Other Information 
PART III. 
ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation 
ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder 

Matters 

ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 
ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services 
PART IV.  
ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 
ITEM 16    Form 10-K Summary 
SIGNATURES 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This  report  contains  and  incorporates  by  reference  “forward-looking  statements”  within  the  meaning  of  U.S.  federal 
securities  laws.  Forward-looking  statements  are  made  based  on  management’s  current  expectations  and  beliefs 
concerning future developments. Actual results may differ, possibly materially, from forward-looking statements due to 
various factors. For a discussion of some of these factors, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, and Item 7, Management’s Discussion 
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), of this report. 

Royal Gold does not own, develop, or mine the properties on which it holds stream or royalty interests, except for our 
interest in the Peak Gold, LLC joint venture (“Peak Gold JV”). Certain information provided in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K  about  operating  properties  in  which  we  hold  interests,  including  information  about  reserves,  historical 
production, production estimates, property descriptions, and property developments, was provided to us by the operators 
of  those  properties  or  is  publicly  available  information  filed  by  these  operators  with  applicable  securities  regulatory 
bodies,  including  the Securities and  Exchange  Commission (the  “SEC”).  Royal Gold  has  not  verified, and  is  not  in  a 
position  to  verify,  and  expressly  disclaims  any  responsibility  for  the  accuracy,  completeness,  or  fairness  of,  such 
third-party information and refers the reader to the public reports filed by the operators for information regarding those 
properties. 

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “Royal Gold,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Royal 
Gold, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries 

PART I 

ITEM 1.   BUSINESS 

Overview 

We acquire and manage precious metal streams, royalties, and similar interests. We seek to acquire existing stream and 
royalty interests or to finance projects that are in production or in the development stage in exchange for stream or royalty 
interests. Please refer to Item 2, Properties, for a discussion of the development at our principal properties. 

We manage our business under two segments: 

Acquisition and Management of Stream Interests—A metal stream is a purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for 
an upfront deposit payment, the right to purchase all or a portion of one or more metals produced from a mine, at a price 
determined for the life of the transaction by the purchase agreement. As of June 30, 2020, we owned seven stream interests, 
which  are  on  six  producing  properties  and  two  development  stage  properties.  Our  stream  interests  accounted  for 
approximately 72% of our total revenue for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. We expect stream 
interests to continue representing a significant portion of our total revenue. 

Acquisition and Management of Royalty Interests—Royalties are non-operating interests in mining projects that provide 
the right to a percentage of revenue or metals produced from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. As of 
June 30, 2020,  we  owned  royalty  interests  on  35  producing  properties,  14 development  stage  properties  and  130 
exploration stage properties, of which we consider 49 to be evaluation stage projects. We use “evaluation stage” to describe 
exploration  stage  properties  that  contain  mineralized  material  and  on  which  operators  are  engaged  in  the  search  for 
reserves. Royalties accounted for approximately 28% of our total revenue for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 
and 2019. 

We do not conduct mining operations on the properties in which we hold stream and royalty interests. Except for our 
interest in the Peak Gold JV, we are not required to contribute to capital costs, exploration costs, environmental costs, or 
other operating costs on those properties.   

In the ordinary course of business, we engage in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing stream and royalty 
interests, to establish new streams on operating mines, to create new stream and royalty interests through the financing of 
mine  development  or  exploration,  or  to  acquire  companies  that  hold  stream  and  royalty  interests.  We  currently,  and 
generally  at  any  time,  have  acquisition  opportunities  in  various  stages  of  active  review,  including,  for  example,  our 

2 

engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, our analysis of technical, financial, legal and 
other  confidential  information  of  particular  opportunities,  submission  of  indications  of  interest  and  term  sheets, 
participation in preliminary discussions and negotiations and involvement as a bidder in competitive processes. 

As  discussed  in  further  detail  throughout  this  report,  some  highlights  of  our  business  during  fiscal year  2020  were  as 
follows: 

 

 

 

Our revenue increased 18% to $498.8 million, compared to $423.1 million during fiscal 2019. 

We  made  several  key  leadership  changes  due  to  retirements  and  used  our  management  succession 
planning to fill those roles.   

We increased our calendar year dividend to $1.12 per basic share, which is paid in quarterly installments 
throughout calendar year 2020. This represents a 6% increase compared with the dividend paid during 
calendar year 2019. 

Certain Definitions 

Dollar or “$”: Refers to U.S. dollars. We refer to Canadian dollars as C$. 

Gold equivalent ounces (GEOs): GEOs are calculated as Royal Gold’s revenue divided by the average gold price for the 
period.   

Gross smelter return (GSR) royalty: A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less, 
if applicable, certain contract-defined costs paid by or charged to the operator. 

Metal stream: A purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for an upfront deposit payment, the right to purchase all 
or  a  portion  of  one  or  more  metals  produced  from  a  mine,  at  a  price  determined  for  the  life  of  the  transaction  by  the 
purchase agreement. 

Mineralized material: That part of a mineral system that has potential economic significance, but is not included in the 
proven and probable reserve estimates until further drilling and metallurgical work is completed, and until other economic 
and technical feasibility factors based on such work have been resolved. 

Net smelter return (NSR) royalty: A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation less a 
proportionate share of incidental transportation, insurance, refining and smelting costs. 

Net  value  royalty  (NVR):  A  defined percentage  of  the  gross  revenue  from  a  resource  extraction  operation  less  certain 
contract-defined costs. 

Probable reserves: Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that 
used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less 
adequately  spaced.  The  degree  of  assurance,  although  lower  than  that  for  proven  reserves,  is  high  enough  to  assume 
continuity between points of observation. 

Proven reserves: Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings 
or drill holes, grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, 
sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and 
mineral content of reserves are well established. 

Payable metal: Ounces or pounds of metal in concentrate after deduction of a percentage of metal in concentrate by a 
third-party smelter pursuant to smelting contracts. 

3 

Reserve: That part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the 
reserve determination. 

Royalty: The right to receive a percentage or other denomination of mineral production from a mining operation. 

Ton: A unit of weight equal to 2,000 pounds or 907.2 kilograms. 

Tonne: A unit of weight equal to 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms. 

Fiscal 2020 Business Developments 

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, for discussion on recent liquidity and capital resource developments. 

Alturas royalty acquisition 

On January 29, 2020, we entered into an agreement with various private individuals for the acquisition of an NSR royalty 
of up to 1.06% (gold) and up to 1.59% (copper) on mining concessions included as part of the Alturas project, which is 
located within the Coquimbo Region of Chile and held by Compañia Minera Salitrales Limitada, a subsidiary of Barrick 
Gold Corporation (“Barrick”). Total consideration for the royalty is up to $41 million, of which $11 million was paid on 
January 29, 2020. A future payment of up to $20 million is conditioned based on a project construction decision by Barrick 
and the size of the minable mineralized material on the date of the construction decision. A further future payment of up 
to $10 million will be made upon first production from the mining concessions.     

Castelo de Sonhos royalty acquisition   

In August 2019, we entered into an agreement with TriStar Gold Inc. and its subsidiaries (together “TriStar”) to acquire 
(i) up to a 1.5% NSR royalty on the Castelo de Sonhos gold project (“CDS”), located in Brazil, and (ii) warrants to purchase 
up  to  19,640,000  common  shares  of  TriStar.  Total  consideration  was  $7.5  million,  of  which  $4.5  million  was  paid  in 
August 2019, $1.5 million was paid in November 2019, and $1.5 million was paid in March 2020. 

Aggregate  funds  we  invested  with  TriStar  will  be  used  primarily  to  advance  CDS  to  the  feasibility  stage,  including 
advancing permitting activities. A preliminary economic assessment for CDS was prepared by TriStar in calendar 2018 
and was based on a total of 2.0 million ounces of mineralized material at an average gold grade of approximately 1.0 gram 
per tonne. Since August 2019, TriStar has completed reverse circulation drilling, which will support the preparation of a 
preliminary feasibility study. Refer to Note 3 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion. 

Covid-19 and current economic environment 

Several of our operating counterparties previously announced temporary operational curtailments or the withdrawal or 
review of previously disclosed guidance due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The economic and societal impacts 
associated with COVID-19 are fluid and changing rapidly, and we are currently unable to predict the nature or extent of 
any impacts on our results of operations and financial condition. We will continue to monitor any further developments 
that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on stream or royalty interests as part of our regular asset impairment analysis. 

Leadership changes 

We made several key leadership changes as a result of our ongoing management succession planning. After a thorough 
search process, our Board of Directors appointed William Heissenbuttel as our President and Chief Executive Officer and 
a  member  of  the  Board  of  Directors,  effective  January  2,  2020.  Mr.  Heissenbuttel  most  recently  served  as  our  Chief 
Financial  Officer  and  Vice  President  Strategy. In  addition,  the  Board  of  Directors  promoted  the  following  executives 
effective January 2, 2020: Mark Isto, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Paul Libner, Chief Financial 
Officer and Treasurer; and Randy Shefman, Vice President and General Counsel. 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our Operational Information 

Reportable Segments and Financial Information 

We manage our business under two reportable segments, consisting of the acquisition and management of stream interests 
and the acquisition and management of royalty interests. Royal Gold’s long-lived assets (stream and royalty interests, net) 
are geographically distributed as shown in the following table (amounts are in thousands): 

As of June 30, 2020 

As of June 30, 2019 

Canada 
Dominican Republic 
Chile 
Africa 
Mexico 
United States 
Australia 
Rest of world 
Total   

  $ 

interests, net    

  Royalty 
interest 

  Royalty 
interest 

  Total stream   
  and royalty 

  Total stream 
  and royalty 
Stream 
interest 
interests, net 
  767,749   $  200,251   $   968,000 
  451,585 
  451,585    
  —    
  515,733 
  301,507       214,226    
  89,877 
  89,556    
  321    
  83,748 
  —    
  83,748    
  163,398 
  —       163,398    
  31,944 
  31,944    
  —    
  35,031 
  22,993    
  12,038    
  $   1,614,363   $  704,550   $  2,318,913   $   1,622,435   $  716,881   $  2,339,316 

Stream 
interest 
  702,732   $  189,855   $   892,587   $ 
  406,469    
  406,469    
  —    
  501,583    
  277,661       223,922    
  215,784    
  215,463    
  321    
  75,951    
  —    
  75,951    
  159,445    
  —       159,445    
  30,006    
  30,006    
  —    
  37,088    
  25,050    
  12,038    

Our reportable segments for purposes of assessing performance for our fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, and 2019 are 
shown below (amounts are in thousands): 

Stream interests 
Royalty interests 
Total 

Stream interests 

Canada 
Dominican Republic 
Chile 
Africa 

Total stream interests 

Royalty interests 

Canada 
United States 
Mexico 
Australia 
Africa 
Chile 
Rest of world 

Total royalty interests 
Total   

Year Ended June 30, 2020 
Production 
taxes 

     Cost of sales (1)      

      Revenue 
  $    359,868   $ 
  138,951  
  $    498,819   $ 

  83,890   $ 
  —  
  83,890   $ 

      Depletion (2)       

Segment 
gross profit(3) 
  —   $    144,678  $    131,300 
  3,824 
  104,758 
  30,369 
  3,824  $    175,047  $    236,058 

Year Ended June 30, 2019 
Production 
taxes 

      Cost of sales       

      Revenue 
  $    305,824   $ 
  81,021   $ 
  $ 
  37,717  
  35,378  
  17,611  
  171,727  

  $ 

  117,232  
  17,717   $ 
  14,340  
  15,833  
  6,217  
  1,024  
  $-  
  4,738  
  59,869  

  $    423,056   $ 

  77,535   $ 
23,393   $ 
17,675  
7,684  
5,012  
  53,764  

  —  
  —   $ 
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  77,535   $ 

      Depletion 

Segment 
gross profit 
  —   $    127,770  $    100,519 
  57,628 
  —   $ 
  20,042 
  —  
  27,694 
  —  
  12,599 
  —  
  117,963 
  —  

  —   $ 
  —  
  —  
  —  
  -  

  4,112 

  35,086 

  78,034 
  17,717 
  14,340 
  15,833 
  6,217 
  1,024 
  - 
  4,738 
  59,869 
  4,112  $    162,856  $    178,553 

  —   $ 
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  -  

  $-   $ 
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  -  

(1)  Excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization. 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)  Depletion amounts are included within Depreciation, depletion and amortization on our consolidated statements of operations and 

comprehensive income (loss). 

(3)  Refer to Note 14 to consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of total segment gross profit to consolidated income (loss) 

before income taxes. 

Our financial results are primarily tied to the price of gold and, to a lesser extent, the prices of silver and copper, together 
with  the  amounts  of  production  from  our  producing-stage  stream  and  royalty  interests.  During  the  fiscal year  ended 
June 30, 2020, we derived approximately 88% of our revenue from precious metals (including 79% from gold and 9% 
from  silver),  9%  from  copper,  and  3%  from  other  minerals.  The  prices  of  gold,  silver,  copper,  and  other  metals  have 
fluctuated widely in recent years. The marketability and the price of metals are influenced by numerous factors beyond 
our control. Significant declines in the prices of gold, silver, or copper could have a material adverse effect on our results 
of operations and financial condition. 

Competition 

The mining industry in general, and streaming and royalty segments in particular, are very competitive. We compete with 
other streaming and royalty companies, mine operators, and financial buyers in efforts to acquire existing streaming and 
royalty interests. We also compete with the lenders, investors, and streaming and royalty companies providing financing 
to operators of mineral properties in our efforts to create new streaming and royalty interests. Our competitors may be 
larger than we are and may have greater resources and access to capital than we have. Key competitive factors in the stream 
and  royalty  acquisition  and  financing  business  include  the  ability  to  identify  and  evaluate  potential  opportunities, 
transaction structure and consideration, and access to capital. 

Regulation 

Operators of the mines that are subject to our stream and royalty interests must comply with numerous environmental, 
mine safety, land use, waste disposal, remediation and public health laws and regulations promulgated by federal, state, 
provincial and local governments in the United States, Canada, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Ghana, Mexico, Botswana, 
Australia  and  other  countries  where  we  hold  interests.  Although  we,  as  a  stream  or  royalty  interest  owner,  are  not 
responsible for ensuring compliance with these laws and regulations, failure by the operators to comply with applicable 
laws, regulations and permits can result in injunctive action, orders to suspend or cease operations, damages, and civil and 
criminal penalties on the operators, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial 
condition. 

Corporate Information 

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 5, 1981. Our executive offices are located at 
1144 15th Street, Suite 2500, Denver, Colorado 80202. Our telephone number is (303) 573-1660. 

SEC Filings 

We file periodic and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. This includes our Annual 
Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those 
forms. These reports are available free of charge on our website at www.royalgold.com as soon as reasonably practicable 
after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. These reports also can be obtained on the SEC’s website 
at www.sec.gov. The information on our website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC. 

Employees 

We currently have 27 employees, 18 of which work out of our office in Denver, Colorado. The remainder work out of our 
offices  in  Lucerne,  Switzerland,  Vancouver,  Canada,  and  Toronto,  Canada.  Our  employees  are  not  subject  to  a  labor 
contract or collective bargaining agreement. We consider our overall employee relations to be good. 

6 

Our global offices are adhering by the guidelines provided to the local health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic.   
The adoption of a remote work environment has not caused any material interruptions to the day-to-day activities of the 
Company. 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 

You  should  carefully  consider  the  risks  described  in  this  section.  Our  future  performance  is  subject  to  risks  and 
uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and 
the trading price of our common stock. We may be subject to other risks and uncertainties not presently known to us. In 
addition, please see our note about forward-looking statements included in Part II, Item 7, MD&A of this Annual Report 
on Form 10-K. 

Risks Relating to our Business 

Our revenue is subject to volatility in metal prices, which could negatively affect our results of operations or cash flow. 

Market  prices  for  gold,  silver,  copper,  nickel,  and  other  metals  may  fluctuate  widely  over  time  and  are  affected  by 
numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include metal supply and demand, industrial and jewelry fabrication, 
investment demand, central banking actions, inflation expectations, currency values, interest rates, forward sales by metal 
producers, and political, trade, economic, or banking conditions. 

Our revenue is directly tied to metal prices. Under our stream agreements, we purchase metal at a fixed price or a stated 
percentage of the market price and then sell the metal in the open market. If market prices decline, our revenue and cash 
flow from metal sales decline. A price decline can also impact our revenue under certain sliding-scale royalty agreements 
as  we  may  receive  a  lower  royalty  rate  when  prices  fall  below  specified  thresholds.  In  addition,  some  of  our  royalty 
agreements are based on the operator’s concentrate sales to smelters and allow for price adjustments between the operator 
and the smelter based on metals prices on a future date, typically three to five months after shipment of concentrate. These 
price adjustments can decrease our revenue in future periods if metal prices decline following shipment. 

Price declines could cause an operator to reduce, suspend, or terminate production or development at a project, which 
would  impact  our  future  revenue  from  the  project.  These  production  or  development  decisions  could  prevent  us  from 
recovering our initial investment in the project or result in an impairment to the value of our initial investment. 

We  own  passive  interests  in  mining  properties  and  cannot  ensure  properties  are  developed  or  operated  in  our  best 
interests. 

Our revenue is derived entirely from stream and royalty interests in properties owned and operated by third parties. In 
general,  we  have  no  decision-making  authority  regarding  the  development  or  operation  of  the  mineral  properties 
underlying our stream and royalty interests. Operators make all development and operating decisions, including decisions 
about permitting, feasibility analysis, mine design and operation, processing, plant and equipment matters, and temporary 
or permanent suspension of operations. We generally are not entitled to compensation if operations are shut down. This 
creates risk for us because operators may at times have business interests that are inconsistent with our interests or may act 
contrary to our interests. 

Our revenue is subject to operational and other risks faced by operators of the properties in which we hold stream or 
royalty interests. 

We generally are not required to pay capital or operating costs on projects in which we hold stream or royalty interests. 
However, our revenue and the value of our investments are indirectly subject to hazards and risks normally associated 
with developing and operating mining properties, including the following: 

7 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

insufficient ore reserves 
increased capital or operating costs 
declines in the price of gold, silver, copper, nickel, or other metals 
construction or development delays 
operational disruptions, including those caused by pandemics or other global or local health crises 
inability to obtain or maintain necessary permits 
inability to replace or increase reserves as properties are mined 
inability to maintain, or challenges to, exploration or mining rights 
changes in mining taxes and royalties payable to governments 
significant changes to environmental, permitting, or other regulatory requirements 
challenges  to  operations,  permits,  or  mining  rights  by  local  communities,  indigenous  populations, 
non-government organizations, or others 
litigation between operators and third parties relating to the properties 
community or civil unrest, including protests and blockades 
labor shortages, increased labor costs, labor disputes, strikes, or work stoppages 
unavailability of mining, drilling, or other equipment 
unanticipated geological conditions or metallurgical characteristics 
unanticipated ground or water conditions, including lack of access to sufficient water 
inadequate supplies of power or other raw materials 
pit wall or tailings dam failures or underground stability issues 
fires, explosions, or other industrial accidents 
injuries to humans, property, or the environment 
natural  catastrophes  and  environmental  hazards  such  as  earthquakes,  droughts,  floods,  forest  fires, 
hurricanes, weather, or climate events 
physical effects of climate change and regulatory changes designed to reduce the effects of climate change; 
uncertain political and economic environments 
economic downturns 
insufficient financing or inability to obtain financing 
default by an operator on its obligations to us or its other creditors 
insolvency, bankruptcy, or other financial difficulty of the operator 
changes in laws or regulations or the enforcement of laws or regulations 

The occurrence of any of these events could negatively impact operations at the properties in which we hold stream or 
royalty interests, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flow. 

The  current  COVID-19  pandemic has adversely  affected, and may  continue  to  adversely  affect,  operations at  some 
properties in which we have stream or royalty interests, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of 
operations and financial condition. 

The world is currently experiencing a deadly outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, or COVID-19. Public health and 
government authorities have recommended and mandated precautions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, including in 
some cases quarantines, shelter-in-place orders, and restrictions on mining-related activities. As a result, several of our 
operating counterparties, including at our principal properties, have had temporary operational curtailments. There may 
be additional curtailments. The COVID-19 pandemic could also disrupt operators’ supply or distribution chains or access 
to  workers,  which  in  turn  could  adversely  impact  their  production  or  sales.  In  addition,  development  and  exploration 
activities at some properties may be delayed or suspended. Any of these events could have a material adverse impact on 
our results of operations and financial condition in future periods. We are unable to predict the nature or extent of any 
impact the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our future results of operations and financial condition. 

The current COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the global economy and markets over the past several 
months and may continue to do so, which could adversely affect our business or the trading price of our stock. 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
The global economy, metal prices, and financial markets have experienced significant volatility and uncertainty due to 
COVID-19. Our revenue is directly related to the market price of gold and other metals. Metal price volatility causes our 
revenue to fluctuate from period to period. This price volatility could also cause operators or developers to defer or forgo 
projects,  which  could  adversely  impact  our  future  revenue.  Moreover,  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business,  we  review 
opportunities to acquire new stream and royalty interests and currently have acquisition opportunities at various stages of 
review. Reduced economic and travel activities or illness among our management team as a result of COVID-19 could 
limit  or delay acquisition opportunities  or other  business  activities.  In addition,  economic volatility,  disruptions  in  the 
financial markets, or severe price declines for gold or other metals could adversely affect our ability to obtain future debt 
or equity financing for acquisitions on acceptable terms. Government efforts to counter the economic effects of COVID-
19 through liquidity and stimulus programs may be insufficient or ineffective in preventing or reducing the effects of a 
recession. It is difficult to determine the extent of the economic and market impacts from COVID-19 and the many ways 
in which they may negatively affect our business and the trading price of our stock. 

A significant portion of our revenue comes from a small number of operating properties, which means that adverse 
developments at these properties could have a more significant or lasting impact on our results of operations than if 
our revenue was less concentrated. 

Approximately 75% of our revenue for fiscal year 2020 came from six properties: Mount Milligan, Andacollo, Pueblo 
Viejo, Wassa, Peñasquito, and Cortez. We expect these properties to continue to represent a significant portion of revenue 
going forward. This concentration of revenue could mean that adverse developments, including any adverse decisions 
made by the operators, at one or more of these properties could have a more significant or longer-term impact on our 
results of operations than if our revenue was less concentrated. 

Operators may fail to comply with their contractual arrangements with us or may interpret their obligations in a manner 
adverse to us, which could decrease our revenue or increase our costs. 

At times, operators may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their contractual obligations to us. In addition, we often rely on 
the operators for the calculation of our stream deliveries or royalty payments. When we enter into new stream or royalty 
interests, we attempt to secure contractual rights that allow us to monitor operators’ compliance with their obligations to 
us, such as audit or access rights. However, these rights may not be sufficient to ensure compliance. In addition, our stream 
and  royalty  agreements  are  often  complex  and  may  be  subject  to  interpretation  or  uncertainties.  Operators  and  other 
counterparties may interpret our interests in a manner adverse to us. For these or other reasons, we could be forced to 
expend  resources  or  take  legal  action  to  enforce  our  contractual  rights.  We  may  not  be  successful  in  enforcing  our 
contractual rights. As a result, our revenue relating to the disputed interests could be adversely affected. We may also need 
to expend significant monetary and human resources to defend our position, which could adversely affect our results of 
operations. In addition, we may be required to make retroactive revenue adjustments in future periods relating to past 
period revenue as a result of information that we learn through audit or access rights. 

We often have limited access to data about operating properties, which may make it difficult for us to project or assess 
the performance of our stream and royalty interests. 

We  often  do  not  have  the  contractual  right  to  receive  production,  operating,  and  other  data  from  the  operators  of  the 
properties in which we hold stream and royalty interests. As a result, it may be difficult for us to project or assess the 
performance of a stream or royalty interest. This could result in delays in, or reductions of, our cash flow from the amounts 
that we anticipate based on the stage of development of or production from the properties, which could have an adverse 
impact on our results of operations or financial condition. 

Our stream and royalty interests may not result in the anticipated returns or may not otherwise ultimately benefit our 
business. 

We  are  continually  reviewing  opportunities  to  acquire  new  stream  and  royalty  interests,  and  we  have  acquisition 
opportunities at various stages of review. Any acquisition could be material to us. At times, we also consider opportunities 
to restructure our existing stream or royalty interests where we believe the restructuring would provide a long-term benefit 
to us, even though it could reduce near-term revenues or result in the incurrence of transaction-related costs. The success 

9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
of our stream and royalty interests is based in part on our ability to make accurate assumptions at the time of acquisition 
about the amount and timing of revenue to be derived from those interests. These assumptions are based on a variety of 
factors,  including  the  geological,  metallurgical,  permitting,  environmental,  and  other  aspects  of  the  project.  For 
development projects, we also make assumptions about the cost, timing, and conduct of development. If an operator fails 
to bring a project into production as expected or if actual performance otherwise falls short of our assumptions, our revenue 
derived from the project may not be sufficient to yield an adequate, or any, return on our investment. In addition, we could 
be required to decrease the carrying value of our investment, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of 
operations or financial condition. We cannot ensure that any acquisition or other transaction will ultimately benefit Royal 
Gold. 

We may not be able to acquire additional stream or royalty interests at appropriate valuations. 

Our  future  success  depends  largely  on  our  ability  to  acquire  additional  stream  and  royalty  interests  at  appropriate 
valuations. We may not be able to identify and complete acquisitions of additional interests at appropriate prices or terms. 
We may not have sufficient liquidity or may not be able to obtain debt or equity financing to fund acquisitions due to 
economic volatility, credit crises, declines in metal prices, or other reasons. Certain of our competitors are larger and have 
greater financial resources than we do, and we may not be able to compete effectively against them. In addition, changes 
to tax rules, accounting policies, or the treatment of stream interests by ratings agencies could make streams or royalties 
less attractive to counterparties. Any of these factors could adversely affect our ability to acquire new stream or royalty 
interests, which would adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition. 

Some  of  the  agreements  governing  our  stream  and  royalty  interests  contain  terms  that  reduce  or  cap  the  revenue 
generated from those interests. 

Revenue from some of our stream and royalty interests decreases or stops after threshold production, delivery, or payment 
milestones  are  achieved.  For  example,  our  stream  interests  at  Pueblo  Viejo,  Andacollo,  Wassa,  and  Khoemacau,  and 
certain  of  our  royalty  interests  at  other  properties,  contain  these  types  of  limitations.  As  a  result,  past  production  and 
revenue relating to these interests may not be indicative of future results. 

If the assumptions underlying operators’ production, reserve, or mineralized material estimates are inaccurate or if 
future  events  cause  operators  to  negatively  adjust  their  previous  estimates,  our  future  revenue  or  the  value  of  our 
investments could be adversely affected. 

The operators of the properties in which we hold stream and royalty interests generally prepare production and reserve 
estimates for the properties. We do not independently prepare or verify this information. There are numerous uncertainties 
inherent in these estimates, many of which are outside the operators’ control. As a result, production and reserve estimates 
are subjective and necessarily depend upon a number of assumptions, including, among others, reliability of historical 
data,  geologic  and  mining  conditions,  metallurgical  recovery,  metal  prices,  operating  costs,  capital  expenditures, 
development and reclamation costs, mining technology improvements, and the effects of government regulation.    If any 
of the assumptions that operators make in connection with production or reserve estimates are incorrect, actual production 
could be significantly lower than the production or reserve estimates, which could adversely affect our future revenue and 
the value of our investments. In addition, if operators’ estimates with respect to the timing of production are incorrect, we 
may experience variances in expected revenue from period to period. 

Some operators also report publicly or to us estimates of mineralized material. The term “mineralized material” does not 
indicate  proven  or  probable  reserves  as  defined  by  the  SEC.  Mineralized  material  is  subject  to  future  exploration  and 
development and associated risks and may never convert to future reserves.    In addition, estimates of mineralized material 
are subject to similar uncertainties and assumptions as discussed above with respect to mineral reserves. 

Our disclosures relating to operating properties will change as a result of new SEC disclosure rules, and we continue 
to face uncertainty around how some of these rules apply to a streaming and royalty company. 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In  2018,  the  SEC  adopted  amendments  to  its  disclosure  requirements  for  mining  companies,  including  streaming  and 
royalty  companies.  We  are  required  to  comply  with  the  new  rules  for  our  fiscal  year  beginning  on  July  1,  2021.  Our 
disclosures about operating properties will change under the new rules, and, in some cases, we may be required to disclose 
in  our  SEC  filings  more  or  less  information  than  we  currently  disclose  about  these  properties.  There  continues  to  be 
uncertainty about how the rules will apply to a streaming and royalty company with significant investments in properties 
run by international operators that are not required to report under SEC rules. 

Most of our revenue is derived from properties outside the United States, and risks associated with conducting business 
in  foreign  countries  or  other  sovereign  jurisdictions  could  adversely  affect  our  results  of  operations  or  financial 
condition. 

Over 90% of our revenue comes from properties outside of the United States, and many of our operators are organized 
outside  of  the  United  States.  Within  the  United  States  and  other  countries,  indigenous  people  may  be  recognized  as 
sovereign entities and may enforce their own laws and regulations. Our and operators’ activities are subject to the risks 
associated with conducting business in foreign countries or other sovereign jurisdictions, including the following: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

expropriation or nationalization of mining property or other government takings 
seizure of mineral production 
exchange and currency controls and fluctuations 
limitations on foreign exchange or repatriation of earnings 
restrictions on mineral production or price controls 
import or export regulations, including trade wars and sanctions and restrictions on metal exports 
changes in government taxation, royalties, tariffs, or duties 
changes in economic, trade, diplomatic, or other relationships between countries or the effects on global and 
economic conditions, the stability of global financial markets, or the ability of key market participants to 
operate in certain financial markets 
high rates of inflation 
unfamiliar or uncertain foreign real estate, mineral tenure, safety, or environmental rules 

 
 
  war, crime, terrorism, sabotage, blockades, or other forms of civil unrest 
 
 
 
 
 

uncertain political or economic environments 
corruption 
exposure to liabilities under anti-corruption or anti-money laundering laws 
suspension of the enforcement of creditors’ or stockholders’ rights 
loss of access to government-controlled infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, rails, ports, power sources, and 
water supplies 

These risks may limit or disrupt the development or operation of properties in which we hold stream and royalty interests 
or impair our rights or interests in these properties, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial 
condition. 

We and our operating properties may be subject to environmental risks, including risks associated with climate change, 
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or the value of our investments. 

Mining operations are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing land use and the protection of the environment. 
In addition, many countries have implemented laws and regulations designed to address the effects of climate change, 
including rules to reduce industrial emissions and increase energy efficiency. These laws and regulations are constantly 
evolving in a manner generally expected to result in stricter standards, more liability, and increased costs. Compliance 
with these laws and regulations can impose substantial costs and burdens on operators of properties subject to our interests. 
In addition, an operator’s failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in injunctive action, orders to 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
suspend or cease operations, damages, or civil or criminal penalties on the operator. If any of these events were to occur, 
our revenue or the value of our investment could be adversely affected. 

Further, due to expansive environmental laws, it is possible that we could become subject to environmental liabilities for 
historic periods during which we owned or operated properties or relative to our current ownership interests in lease and 
underlying unpatented mining claims. These liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or 
financial condition. 

Unknown defects in our stream or royalty interests or the bankruptcy or insolvency of an operator could have a material 
adverse effect on the value of our investments. 

Despite our due diligence practices, it is possible that unknown defects or problems will exist relating to the existence, 
validity, enforceability, terms, or geographic extent of our stream and royalty interests. Similarly, stream interests and, in 
many jurisdictions, royalty interests are contractual in nature, rather than interests in land. As a result, these interests may 
not survive a bankruptcy or insolvency of an operator. We often do not have the protection of security interests that could 
help us recover all or part of our investment in a stream or royalty interest in the event of an operator’s bankruptcy or 
insolvency. If our stream or royalty interests were set aside through judicial or administrative proceedings, the value of 
our investments could be adversely affected. 

Anti-corruption laws and regulations could subject us to liability and require us to incur costs. 

We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") and other laws that prohibit improper payments or 
offers  of  payments  to  third  parties,  including  foreign  governments  and  their  officials,  for  the  purpose  of  obtaining  or 
retaining business. In some cases, we invest in mining operations in jurisdictions that have experienced corruption in the 
past. Our international investment activities create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments in violation of 
the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws by one of our employees or agents in violation of our policies. In addition, the 
operators of the properties in which we own stream and royalty interests may fail to comply with anti-corruption laws and 
regulations. Although we are passive investors in these properties, enforcement authorities could deem us to have some 
culpability for the operators’ actions. Any violations of the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws could result in significant 
civil or criminal penalties to us and could have an adverse effect on our reputation. 

A  significant  disruption  to  our  information  technology  systems  could  adversely  affect  our  business  and  operating 
results. 

We rely on a variety of information technology and automated operating systems to manage and support our operations. 
For  example,  we  depend  on  our  information  technology  systems  for  financial  reporting,  operational  and  investment 
management,  and  email.  These  systems  contain  our  proprietary  business  information  and  personally  identifiable 
information  of  our  employees.  The  proper  functioning  of  these  systems  and  the  security  of  this  data  is  critical  to  the 
efficient operation and management of our business. In addition, these systems could require modifications or upgrades as 
a result of technological changes or growth in our business. These changes could be costly and disruptive to our operations 
and could impose substantial demands on management time. Our systems, and those of third-party providers, could be 
vulnerable to damage or disruption caused by catastrophic events, power outages, natural disasters, computer system or 
network failures, viruses or malware, physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized access, or cyber-attacks. Any security 
breach could compromise our networks, and the information stored on them could be improperly accessed, disclosed, lost, 
or stolen. The steps that we have taken to secure our systems and electronic information may not be adequate to prevent a 
disruption. Any unauthorized activities could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, or result in legal claims or 
proceedings, any of which could adversely affect our business, reputation, or operating results. 

We depend on the services of our executives and other key employees, and the loss of one or more members of our 
management team could harm our business. 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We believe that our success depends on retaining qualified executives and other key employees. Our management team 
has  significant  industry  and  company-specific  experience.  If  we  are  unsuccessful  at  retaining  or  attracting  qualified 
personnel, our business could be disrupted and our ability to achieve our business objectives and grow effectively could 
be jeopardized. We do not currently maintain key person life insurance on any of our directors or employees. 

Current and future indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and impair our ability to operate our 
business. 

As of June 30, 2020, we had $305 million outstanding and $695 million available under our revolving credit facility. We 
may  incur  additional  indebtedness  in  the  future.  Current  and  future  indebtedness  could  have  important  consequences, 
including the following: 

 

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service indebtedness, thereby 
reducing the availability of cash flow to fund acquisitions, working capital, or dividends 
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business 
restrict us from exploiting business opportunities 

 
 
  make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy 
 
 
 

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness 
require the consent of our existing lenders to incur additional indebtedness 
limit our ability to borrow additional funds for acquisitions, working capital, or debt-service requirements 

Our  credit  facility  contains  financial  and  other  restrictive  covenants.  For  example,  the  agreement  includes  financial 
covenants that require us to maintain a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio (as these terms are 
defined under the agreement). These covenants could limit our ability to engage in activities that are in our long-term best 
interests. Our failure to comply with these covenants would result in an event of default that, if not waived, could result in 
the acceleration of all outstanding indebtedness. Our credit facility expires in June 2024. In the future, we may be unable 
to obtain new financing or refinancing on acceptable terms. 

The  proposed  phase  out  of  the  London  Interbank  Offered  Rate  ("LIBOR")  could  adversely  affect  our  results  of 
operations or financial condition. 

In 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced that it intends 
to phase out LIBOR by the end of calendar 2021. The Federal Reserve Board has convened a group of private-market 
participants to identify a proposed alternative rate and address the transition from LIBOR to an alternative rate. In 2019, 
the FASB proposed guidance that would help facilitate the market transition from existing reference rates to alternative 
rates.  Borrowings  under  our  revolving  credit  facility  bear  interest  at  LIBOR  plus  an  applicable  margin.  Under  the 
agreement  governing  the  facility,  if  LIBOR  is  phased  out,  we  are  required  to  negotiate  in  good  faith  to  establish  an 
alternative rate under the facility. There is currently no definitive information regarding the future use of LIBOR or a 
replacement rate. We are unable to predict whether and to what extent a LIBOR change would impact our future results 
of operations and financial condition. 

Risks Related to our Common Stock 

Our stock price may continue to be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment. 

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and may continue to do so in the future. For example, 
during fiscal year 2020, the market price of our common stock ranged from a low of $59.78 to a high of $139.63. Many 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
factors unrelated to operating performance can contribute to volatility in the market price of our common stock, including 
the following: 

economic, market, or political conditions, including the effects of COVID-19 

 
  market prices of gold, silver, copper, nickel, and other metals 
 
 
 
 

developments relating to operating properties 
interest rates and expectations about inflation 
currency values 
credit market conditions 

These market fluctuations, regardless of cause, may materially and adversely affect our stock price. As a result, you could 
lose all or part of your investment. 

We  may  issue  additional  equity  securities,  which  would  dilute  our  existing  stockholders  and  reduce  our  per-share 
financial measures and could reduce the market price of our common stock. 

We may issue additional equity in the future in connection with acquisitions, strategic transactions, or for other purposes. 
If we issue additional equity securities, our existing stockholders would be diluted and our per-share financial measures 
would be reduced. In addition, shares of common stock that we issue in connection with an acquisition may not be subject 
to resale restrictions. The market price of our common stock could decline if our stockholders sell substantial amounts of 
our common stock or are perceived by the market as intending to sell these shares other than in an orderly manner. 

We may change our practice of paying dividends, which could reduce the value of your investment. 

We have paid a cash dividend on our common stock since calendar year 2000. Our board of directors has discretion in 
determining  whether  to  declare  a  dividend  based  on  a  number  of  factors,  including  metal  prices,  economic  or  market 
conditions, earnings, cash flow, financial condition, and funding requirements for future opportunities or operations. In 
addition, corporate law limitations or future contractual restrictions could limit our ability to pay dividends in the future. 
If  our  board  of  directors  reduces  or  eliminates  future  dividends,  our  stock  price  could  fall,  and  the  success  of  your 
investment would depend largely on any future stock price appreciation. We have increased our dividend in prior years. 
There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to do so or that we will pay any dividends. 

Provisions of Delaware law and our organizational documents could delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us. 

The anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose barriers to the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even 
if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and 
bylaws contain provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of 
our board of directors. These provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of 
our outstanding common stock. Among other things, these provisions provide for the following: 

 

 
 

 
 
 

allow our board of directors to issue shares of common stock and preferred stock without stockholder approval, 
except as may be required by Nasdaq rules 
allow our board of directors to establish the rights and preferences of authorized and unissued preferred stock 
provide for a classified board, whereby our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors serving 
staggered three-year terms 
prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders 
require advance notice of stockholder proposals and related information 
require vacancies and newly created directorships on the board of directors to be filled only by affirmative vote 
of a majority of the directors then serving on the board 

These  provisions  could  increase  the  cost  of  acquiring  us  or  discourage  a  third  party  from  acquiring  us  or  removing 
incumbent management, which could decrease the value of your investment. 

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 

None. 

ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES 

We do not own or operate the properties on which we hold stream or royalty interests, except for our interest in the Peak 
Gold JV, and therefore much of the information disclosed in this Form 10-K regarding these properties is provided to us 
by the operators. For example, the operators of certain properties provide us information regarding metals production, 
estimates of mineral reserves and additional mineralized material and production estimates. A list of our producing and 
development  stage  streams  and  royalties,  as  well  their  respective  reserves,  are  summarized  in  Table 1  “Operators’ 
Estimated  Proven  and  Probable  Gold  Reserves”  below  within  this  Item 2.  More  information  is  available  to  the  public 
regarding certain properties in which we have stream or royalty interests, including reports filed with the SEC or with the 
Canadian securities regulatory agencies available at www.sec.gov or www.sedar.com, respectively. 

We manage our business under two reportable segments, consisting of the acquisition and management of stream interests 
and the acquisition and management of royalty interests. The description of our principal streams and royalties set forth 
below includes the location, operator, stream or royalty rate, access and any material current developments at the property. 
For any reported production amounts discussed below, we consider reported production to relate to the amount of metal 
sales subject to our stream and royalty interests. Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, for discussion on production estimates, 
historical  production  and  revenue  for  our  principal  properties.  The  map  below  illustrates  the  location  of  our  principal 
producing stage properties. 

Principal Producing Properties 

We consider both historical and future potential revenues to determine which stream and royalty interests in our portfolio 
are principal to our business. Estimated future potential revenues from producing properties are based on a number of 
factors, including reserves subject to our stream and royalty interests, production estimates, feasibility studies, technical 
reports, metal price assumptions, mine life, legal status and other factors and assumptions, any of which could change and 
could cause us to conclude that one or more of such stream and royalty interests are no longer principal to our business. 
Currently, we consider the properties discussed below (listed alphabetically by stream and royalty interest) to be principal 
to our business. Based on the factors discussed above, we no longer consider Rainy River to be a principal property. 

15 

 
 
Stream Interests 

Andacollo (Region IV, Chile) 

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, RGLD Gold AG (“RGLD Gold”) owns the right to purchase 100% of the gold 
produced  from  the  Andacollo  copper-gold  mine  until  900,000  ounces  of  payable  gold  have  been  delivered,  and  50% 
thereafter.    The cash purchase price equals 15% of the monthly average gold price for the month preceding the delivery 
date for all gold purchased. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 237,100 ounces of payable gold have been delivered to 
RGLD Gold.     

Andacollo is an open-pit mine and milling operation located in central Chile, Region IV in the Coquimbo Province and is 
operated  by  Compañía  Minera  Teck  Carmen  de  Andacollo  (“CMCA”),  a  90%  owned  subsidiary  of  Teck  Resources 
Limited  (“Teck”).  The  Andacollo  mine  is  located  in  the  foothills  of  the  Andes  Mountains  approximately  1.5  miles 
southwest of the town of Andacollo. The regional capital of La Serena and the coastal city of Coquimbo are approximately 
34 miles northwest of the Andacollo mine by road, and Santiago is approximately 215 miles south by air. Access to the 
mine  is  provided  by  Route  43  (R-43)  south  from  La  Serena  to  El  Peñon.  From  El  Peñon,  D-51  is  followed  east  and 
eventually curves to the south to Andacollo. Both R-43 and D-51 are paved roads. 

Stream deliveries from Andacollo were approximately 43,900 ounces of gold during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, 
compared  to  approximately  51,900  ounces  of  gold  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30, 2019.    Stream  deliveries 
decreased as a result of the temporary suspension of operations during the quarter ended December 31, 2019, due to a 
workers’ strike from October 14, 2019 through December 5, 2019, which was resolved with the ratification of a new 36-
month collective agreement. 

16 

 
 
 
Teck expects grades to continue to decline towards reserve grades in calendar year 2020 and future years. The current life 
of mine for Andacollo is expected to continue until calendar year 2035. Additional permits or permit amendments will be 
required to execute the life of mine plan. 

Khoemacau Project (Botswana) 

In February 2019, RGLD Gold entered into a silver stream with Khoemacau Copper Mining (Pty.) Limited (“KCM”) for 
the purchase of silver produced from the Khoemacau Project (“Khoemacau”). Under the purchase and sale agreement, 
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, RGLD Gold will make advance payments totaling $212 million toward 
the purchase of 80% of the silver produced from Khoemacau until certain delivery thresholds are met (the “Base Silver 
Stream”). At KCM’s option and subject to various conditions, RGLD Gold will make up to an additional $53 million in 
advance payments for up to the remaining 20% of the silver produced from Khoemacau (the “Option Silver Stream”). The 
stream rate will drop to 40% of silver produced from Khoemacau following delivery to RGLD Gold of 32 million silver 
ounces under the Base Silver Stream, or to 50% of the silver produced from Khoemacau following delivery of 40 million 
silver ounces to RGLD Gold should KCM exercise the entire Option Silver Stream. RGLD Gold will pay a cash price 
equal to 20% of the spot silver price for each ounce delivered under the Base Silver Stream and Option Silver Stream; 
however, if KCM achieves mill expansion throughput levels above 13,000 tonnes per day (30% above current mill design 
capacity), RGLD Gold will pay a higher ongoing cash price under the Base Silver Stream and Option Silver Stream for 
silver ounces delivered in excess of specific annual thresholds. 

Khoemacau is a copper-silver development project located within the North West and Ghanzi Districts of Botswana owned 
by KCM. The license area is generally southwest of the town of Maun and northeast of the town of Ghanzi. Khoemacau 
is  accessed  from  the  city  of  Maun,  approximately  40  miles  southwest  to  the  town  of  Toteng  on  a  major  travel  route, 
Botswana’s A3 highway, a paved road and then approximately 16 miles on gravel road to reach the Boseto plant site. The 
Zone 5 mining area is connected to the Boseto plant by a 20-mile gravel road. 

According to KCM, progress continued at Khoemacau during the June 2020 quarter and the project reached approximately 
54% of construction completion as of June 30, 2020 with 81% of the capital committed. According to KCM, activities are 
focused on refurbishment of the Boseto mill, underground development, completion of accommodation, power and water 
infrastructure at Zone 5 and completing construction of the haul road between Zone 5 and the Boseto mill. Also, according 
to KCM, underground development has cumulatively advanced 2,360 meters in the five declines, which is in line with 
planned development rates. 

On July 5, 2020, RGLD Gold made its fourth advance payment of $11.1 million, which brings the total contribution to 
$146.8 million. RGLD Gold expects to commit approximately $35 - $45 million during the remainder of calendar year 
2020, and assuming the midpoint of this range, the total remaining commitment in calendar year 2021 is expected to range 
from approximately $25 million for the Base Silver Stream up to approximately $78 million should KCM elect to fully 
exercise the Option Silver Stream. Further payments are subject to certain conditions and are scheduled to be made on a 
quarterly basis using an agreed formula and certification process as project spending progresses. 

According to KCM, although a six-month state of emergency has been declared by the Government of Botswana to help 
prevent the spread of COVID-19, mining has been designated an “essential service” and general development activity at 
Khoemacau is continuing. However, due to the impacts experienced from travel restrictions, some activities have been 
slowed or rescheduled.    Barring any potential further impacts caused by COVID-19 considerations, we now expect the 
first shipment of concentrate to occur late in the third calendar quarter of 2021.   

Mount Milligan (British Columbia, Canada)   

RGLD Gold owns the right to purchase 35% of the payable gold and 18.75% of the payable copper produced from the 
Mount Milligan copper-gold mine in British Columbia, Canada, which is operated by an indirect subsidiary of Centerra 
Gold  Inc.  (“Centerra”).  The  cash  purchase  price  for  gold  is  equal  to  the  lesser  of  $435  per  ounce,  with  no  inflation 
adjustment, or the prevailing market price when purchased. The cash purchase price for copper is 15% of the spot price.   
As of June 30, 2020, approximately 516,500 ounces of payable gold and 34.71 million pounds of payable copper have 
been delivered to RGLD Gold. 

17 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mount Milligan is an open-pit mine and is located within the Omenica Mining Division in North Central British Columbia, 
approximately 96 miles northwest of Prince George, 53 miles north of Fort St. James, and 59 miles west of Mackenzie. 
The Mount Milligan project is accessible by commercial air carrier to Prince George, British Columbia, then by vehicle 
from the east via Mackenzie on the Finlay Philip Forest Service Road and the North Philip Forest Service Road, and from 
the  west  via  Fort  St. James on  the North  Road  and  Rainbow Forest  Service  Road.  Road  travel  to  the  Mount  Milligan 
property site is 482 miles from Prince Rupert and 158 miles from Prince George. 

Gold stream deliveries from Mount Milligan were approximately 59,900  ounces during  the fiscal year  ended  June 30, 
2020,  compared  to  approximately  68,500  ounces  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2019.  The  decrease  reflects 
differences in the timing of shipments and settlements during the periods, in addition to lower gold grades processed and 
lower gold recovery, slightly offset by increased tonnage processed. 

Copper  stream  deliveries  from  Mount  Milligan  were  approximately  12.7  million  pounds  during  the  fiscal  year  ended 
June 30,  2020,  compared  to  approximately  9.1  million  pounds  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2019.  Increased 
deliveries resulted from differences in the timing of shipments and settlements during the periods, in addition to higher 
tonnage and higher copper grades processed, slightly offset by lower copper recovery. 

On March 26, 2020, Centerra published an updated National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) technical report for the 
Mount Milligan mine, which provided a detailed update to the life of mine plan contained in the previous NI 43-101 report 
for Mount Milligan published by Centerra in calendar 2017. 

Centerra reported a reduction in proven and probable reserves due to increased costs, lower expected productivities, and 
lower process plant  throughput  compared  to  their  calendar 2017  technical  report,  as well  as  an update  to  the  resource 
model  and  re-estimation  of  metallurgical  recoveries.  Details  for  the  reserves  and  updated  mine  plan,  which  does  not 
contemplate any growth capital or inclusion of additional mineralized material, were reported by Centerra as follows: 

  Reserves  as  of  December  31,  2019  containing  2.4  million  ounces  of  gold  and  959  million  pounds  of  copper 
(comprised of 191.0 million tonnes grading 0.39 grams per tonne of gold and 0.23% of copper). Reserves were 
calculated using a gold price of $1,250 per ounce, a copper price of $3.00 per pound, and an exchange rate of 
US$ 1.00 to C$ 1.25; 

  Production based on a 9-year reserve life through calendar 2028; 
  Average life of mine recoveries of 61.8% for gold and 80.6% for copper; 
  Life of mine payable gold production of 1.45 million ounces, or an average of 161,000 ounces per year; 
  Life of mine payable copper production of 735.6 million pounds, or an average of 81.7 million pounds per year; 

and 

  Average life of mine all-in sustaining cost of $704 per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis, which includes 
sustaining capital and copper revenue credits (assuming a copper price of $3.00 per pound and an exchange rate 
of US$ 1.00 to C$ 1.25). 

Significant reductions in proven and probable reserves or mineralized material are indicators of potential impairment for 
our stream and royalty interests. As part of our regular asset impairment analysis during the quarter ended March 31, 2020, 
we determined that an impairment of our stream interest at Mount Milligan was not necessary as (i) the earlier financial 
impairment  taken by  Centerra  does not  impact  the  mine operating  performance,  and (ii)  the  reduction  in  reserves and 
mineralized material at Mount Milligan resulted in updated gold and copper depletion rates that remain well below current 
and long-term consensus gold and copper prices. Due to the reduction in gold and copper reserves, as reported by Centerra, 
the depletion rate of our investment at Mount Milligan increased from $402 to $764 per ounce of gold and from $0.81 to 
$1.48 per pound of copper.   

On April 1, 2020, Centerra announced that reductions of manpower and throughput at Mount Milligan would occur as a 
result of actions implemented to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Centerra has since reported that workforce numbers 
returned to normal over the month of May resulting in mining and plant tonnages returning to planned levels. According 
to Centerra, process plant throughput averaged approximately 60% of target levels and mining operations experienced a 
four week partial shutdown during the reduction period, and during April, the process plant was shut down for eleven 
days to perform routine maintenance and reline the SAG mill. 

18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Centerra also reported that stored water inventory at Mount Milligan, which is critical to the ability to process ore through 
the mill on a sustainable basis, was in excess of six million cubic meters as at June 30, 2020. Centerra reported that 
spring water pumping started in April, and substantial snowpack and a wet spring led to volumes pumped as of the end 
of June that exceeded those of the entire 2019 pumping season.    In addition, Centerra reported that Mount Milligan 
continued to access ground water from the Lower Rainbow Valley wellfield and other groundwater wells near the tailings 
storage facility during the quarter ended June 30, 2020. Centerra also reported that it continued exploration activities 
focused on extending the groundwater capacity in the vicinity of the existing infrastructure, and these activities will 
continue for the remainder of 2020. Further, Centerra reported that it continues to pursue a longer-term solution to its 
water requirements at Mount Milligan. 

On July 31, 2020, Centerra confirmed that there is no change to the previously issued production guidance for Mount 
Milligan for calendar year 2020 of 140,000 to 160,000 payable ounces of gold and 80 to 90 million pounds of copper. 

Pueblo Viejo (Sanchez Ramirez, Dominican Republic)   

RGLD Gold owns the right to purchase 7.5% of Barrick’s interest in the gold produced from the Pueblo Viejo mine until 
990,000 ounces of gold have been delivered, and 3.75% thereafter.    The cash purchase price for gold is 30% of the spot 
price of gold per ounce delivered until 550,000 ounces of gold have been delivered, and 60% of the spot price of gold per 
ounce delivered thereafter. RGLD Gold also owns the right to purchase 75% of Barrick’s interest in the silver produced 
from the Pueblo Viejo mine, subject to a minimum silver recovery of 70%, until 50 million ounces of silver have been 
delivered, and 37.5% thereafter.    The cash purchase price for silver is 30% of the spot price of silver per ounce delivered 
until 23.1 million ounces of silver have been delivered, and 60% of the spot price of silver per ounce delivered thereafter. 
As of June 30, 2020, approximately 226,400 ounces of payable gold and 7.9 million ounces of payable silver have been 
delivered to RGLD Gold. 

The  Pueblo  Viejo  mine  is  located  in  the  province  of  Sanchez  Ramirez,  Dominican  Republic,  approximately  60  miles 
northwest of Santo Domingo, and is owned by a joint venture in which Barrick holds a 60% interest and is responsible for 
operations, and in which Newmont Corporation holds a 40% interest.    Pueblo Viejo is accessed from Santo Domingo by 
traveling northwest on Autopista Duarte, Highway #1, approximately 48 miles to Piedra Blanca and proceeding east for 
approximately 14 miles on Highway #17 to the gatehouse for Pueblo Viejo. Both Highway #1 and Highway #17 are paved. 

Gold stream deliveries from Pueblo Viejo were approximately 45,000 ounces of gold during the fiscal year ended June 30, 
2020,  compared  to  approximately  41,200  ounces  of  gold  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2019.    Silver  stream 
deliveries  were  approximately  1.7  million  ounces  of  silver  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2020,  compared  to 
approximately 2.0 million ounces of silver during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.   

Barrick reports that it continues to advance engineering and evaluation work towards a feasibility study for the process 
plant expansion and proposed tailings storage facility that could extend the mine life at Pueblo Viejo to beyond calendar 
year 2040. Barrick estimates that the process plant and tailings expansion project could significantly increase throughput 
and allow the mine to maintain average annual gold production of approximately 800,000 ounces after calendar year 2022 
(on a 100% basis), and that the increase in tailings storage capacity has the potential to convert approximately 11 million 
ounces of mineralized material to reserves (on a 100% basis). 

Barrick expects the proportion of lower grade stockpile ore in the feed blend to steadily increase until the mine expansion 
pits are fully developed as part of the decision on the proposed plant and tailings expansion project. Barrick also reported 
lower gold production during the June 2020 quarter as a result of a planned maintenance shutdown. For calendar year 
2020, Barrick indicated production attributable to their interest at Pueblo Viejo is expected to be between 530,000 and 
580,000 ounces of gold. 

Wassa (Western Region, Ghana)   

RGLD Gold owns the right to purchase 10.5% of the gold produced from the Wassa, Prestea and Bogoso mines, operated 
by  Golden  Star  Resources  Ltd.  (“Golden  Star”),  until  an  aggregate  240,000  ounces  have  been  delivered.  Once  the 
applicable delivery threshold is met, the stream percentage will decrease to 5.5%. The cash purchase price for gold is 20% 

19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
of the spot price per ounce delivered until 240,000 ounces of gold have been delivered, and 30% of the spot price per 
ounce delivered thereafter. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 110,500 ounces of payable gold have been delivered from 
Wassa, Prestea and Bogoso mines, of that 69,700 ounces of payable gold have been delivered from Wassa to RGLD Gold. 

The Wassa underground mine and oxide ore mill are located near the village of Akyempim in the Wassa East District, in 
the Western Region of Ghana, approximately 50 miles north of Cape Coast and 93 miles west of the capital Accra.    The 
main access to the site is from the east, via the Cape Coast to Twifo-Praso road, then over the combined road-rail bridge 
on the Pra River.    There is also an access road from Takoradi in the south via Mpohor.    An airport at Takoradi is capable 
of handling jet aircraft and is serviced by several commercial flights each day.   

Stream  deliveries  from  Wassa  were  approximately  16,500  ounces  of  gold  during  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2020, 
compared to approximately 16,600 ounces of gold during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.   

On March 27, 2020, Golden Star reported that deep drilling in calendar year 2019 successfully extended the mineralization 
at Wassa by approximately 700 feet to the south where the deposit remains open to the south and down dip. Golden Star 
further reported that the exploration strategy during calendar year 2020 would transition away from growth of the overall 
resource to infill drilling to help define the potential mine plans for the southern extension of the operation. According to 
Golden Star, as of December 31, 2019 the proven mineral reserve at Wassa increased 87% over the prior year period to 
1.4 million ounces of gold, and total underground mineralized material at Wassa contained approximately 11.2 million 
ounces of gold. 

On July 27, 2020, Golden Star announced that it had signed a binding agreement with Future Global Resources Limited 
(“FGR”) for the sale of the Prestea and Bogoso mines. This transaction will require the separation of the RGLD Gold 
stream agreement into separate stream agreements for each of Wassa and Prestea/Bogoso, which is conditional on, among 
other things, the approval of the board of directors of Royal Gold. Further, on July 28, 2020, Golden Star announced that, 
if approved, the separated Wassa stream agreement would require Golden Star to deliver 10.5% of the gold produced from 
Wassa  in  return for  a  cash purchase price  for gold of 20% of  the  spot price  per  ounce  delivered, until  the delivery  of 
240,000 ounces, after which the obligation would decrease to 5.5% of the gold produced from Wassa in return for a cash 
purchase price for gold of 30% of the spot price per ounce delivered. 

On July 28, 2020, Golden Star reported calendar year 2020 gold production guidance for Wassa of between 165,000 to 
170,000 ounces, up from the previous guidance range of 155,000 to 165,000 ounces. 

Royalty Interests 

Cortez (Nevada, USA)   

Cortez is a series of large open-pit and underground mines, utilizing mill and heap leach processing, which are operated 
by Nevada Gold Mines LLC (“NGM”), a joint venture between Barrick and Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”) with 
respect to their Nevada operations.    The operation is located approximately 60 air miles southwest of Elko, Nevada, in 
Lander County.    The site is reached by driving west from Elko on Interstate 80 approximately 46 miles and proceeding 
south  on  State  Highway  306  approximately  23  miles.  Our  royalty  interest  at  Cortez  applies  to  the  Pipeline  and  South 
Pipeline deposits, part of the Gap pit and the Crossroads deposit. 

The royalty interests we hold at Cortez include: 

(a) 

(b) 

Reserve Claims (“GSR1”). This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all products from an area originally 
known as the “Reserve Claims,” which includes the majority of the Pipeline and South Pipeline deposits. 
The GSR1 royalty rate is tied to the price of gold and does not include indexing for inflation or deflation.   
The GSR1 royalty rate is 5.0% at a gold price of $470 per ounce and higher. 

GAS Claims (“GSR2”). This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all products from an area outside of the 
Reserve Claims, originally known as the “GAS Claims,” which encompasses approximately 50% of the 
Gap deposit and all of the Crossroads deposit. The GSR2 royalty rate is tied to the gold price, without 

20 

 
 
 
indexing for inflation or deflation.    The GSR2 royalty rate is 5.0% at a gold price of $470 per ounce 
and higher.   

(c) 

(d) 

Reserve and GAS Claims Fixed Royalty (“GSR3”). The GSR3 royalty is a fixed rate GSR royalty of 
0.7125% and covers the same cumulative area as is covered by our two sliding-scale GSR royalties, 
GSR1 and GSR2, except mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit. 

Net Value Royalty (“NVR1”) and Net Value Royalty (Crossroads) (“NVR1C”). The NVR1 royalty is a 
fixed  royalty  of  4.91%  NVR  that  covers  the  area  of  the  GAS  Claims,  excluding  the  majority  of  the 
Crossroads deposit. The NVR1C royalty, which covers the majority of the Crossroads deposit, is a fixed 
royalty of 4.52% NVR.     

On average, above a gold price of $470 per ounce after the relevant deductions, the combined royalty interests of GSR1, 
GSR2, GSR3, NVR1 and NVR1C are equivalent to an approximate 8.2% gross smelter return royalty to Royal Gold.   

We also own three other royalties in the Cortez area where there is currently no production and no reserves attributed to 
these royalty interests. 

Production attributable to our royalty interest at Cortez increased to 173,300 ounces of gold over the prior fiscal year of 
96,700 ounces of gold, as a result of production ramping up at the Crossroads deposit, which is subject to our NVR1 
(Crossroads) and GSR2 royalty interests and portions of the NVR1 and GSR3 royalty interests.   

During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, Barrick provided us with an updated reserve statement and life of mine plan for 
Cortez. According to Barrick, as of December 31, 2019, total proven and probable reserves subject to our royalty interests 
contained 3.5 million ounces of gold (consisting of 87.0 million tonnes of ore at a grade of 1.26 grams per tonne). Reserves 
were calculated at a gold price of $1,200 per ounce. 

Further according to Barrick, total gold production at Cortez from the regions subject to our interests is expected to be 
approximately  175,000  ounces  in  calendar  year  2020,  increasing  to  an  approximate  average  of  425,000  ounces  from 
calendar 2021 through calendar 2026. The expected production increase from calendar year 2020 to calendar year 2021 is 
primarily due to higher contribution from the Crossroads deposit, which is expected to ramp up through calendar year 
2023 and offset declining production from the other royalty regions. 

Peñasquito (Zacatecas, Mexico)   

We own a production payment equivalent to a 2.0% NSR royalty on all metal production from the Peñasquito open-pit 
mine, located in the State of Zacatecas, Mexico, and operated by a subsidiary of Newmont. The Peñasquito mine is located 
approximately 17 miles west of the town of Concepción del Oro, Zacatecas, Mexico. The mine, composed of two main 
deposits called Peñasco and Chile Colorado, hosts large gold, silver, zinc and lead reserves. The deposits contain both 
oxide and sulfide material, resulting in heap leach and mill processing.    There are two access routes to the site. The first 
is via a turnoff from Highway 54 onto the State La Pardita road, then onto the Mazapil to Cedros State road. The second 
access is via the Salaverna by-pass road from Highway 54 approximately 16 miles south of Concepción del Oro. There is 
a private airport on site and commercial airports in the cities of Saltillo, Zacatecas and Monterrey. 

For fiscal 2020, gold production attributable to our royalty interest at Peñasquito increased to 312,200 ounces over the 
prior fiscal year of 158,800 ounces; silver production increased to 27.8 million ounces over the prior fiscal year of 16.4 
million  ounces;  lead  increased  to  182.3  million  pounds  over  the  prior  fiscal  year  of  117.4  million  pounds;  and  zinc 
increased to 393.9 million pounds over the prior fiscal year of 216.2 million pounds. 

The increase in production is attributable to higher grades and recoveries and tons processed compared to the prior fiscal 
year,  as  well  as  the  suspension of operations  during  the June  2019 quarter, resulting  in  significantly  lower  sales  from 
Peñasquito during the prior fiscal year. 

21 

 
 
 
On  April  22,  2020,  Newmont  announced  Peñasquito  reached  a  definitive  agreement  with  the  San  Juan  de  Cedros 
community (one of 25 neighboring communities) in Zacatecas, Mexico on land use, water availability, infrastructure and 
social investments, which includes access to 10,000 hectares for exploration and operational purposes, and resolves all 
outstanding issues with the community. 

On May 5, 2020, Newmont announced that operations at Peñasquito were placed on care and maintenance on April 12 
due to a Mexican federal government decree to temporarily suspend all non-essential activities in Mexico as part of a 
nationwide effort to help slow the spread of COVID-19. According to Newmont, a phased ramp-up began in mid-May 
with milling and mining activities ramping up at the beginning of June, and production in the plant was back to pre-
COVID levels by mid-June. 

On July 30, Newmont provided full year 2020 production guidance for Peñasquito of 510,000 ounces of gold, 28 million 
ounces of silver, 360 million pounds of zinc, and 190 million pounds of lead. 

Reserve Information 

Table 1 below summarizes proven and probable reserves for gold, silver, copper, nickel, zinc, lead and cobalt that are 
subject  to  our  stream  and  royalty  interests  as  of  December 31,  2019,  as  reported  to  us  by  the  operators  of  the  mines. 
Properties are currently in production unless noted as development (“DEV”) within the table. The exploration royalties we 
own do not contain proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2019. Please refer to pages 22-26 for the footnotes 
to Table 1. 

22 

 
 
 
Operators’ Estimated Proven and Probable Gold Reserves 
As of December 31, 2019(1) 

Gold(2) 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

      Average 

PROPERTY 
Bald Mountain 
Cortez GSR1 
Cortez GSR2 
Cortez GSR3 
Cortez NVR1 
Cortez NVR1C 
Gold Hill   

Goldstrike (SJ Claims) 
Hasbrouck Mountain (DEV) 
Leeville   
Marigold 
Pinson (DEV) 

Relief Canyon (DEV) 
Robinson 
Ruby Hill 
Twin Creeks 
Wharf   
Back River - Goose Lake (DEV) 
Canadian Malartic   
Holt 
Kutcho Creek (DEV) 
LaRonde Zone 5 
Mount Milligan 
Pine Cove 
Rainy River 
Williams 
Dolores 
Peñasquito 
Andacollo 
La Fortuna (DEV) 
Don Mario 
Don Nicolas 
Pueblo Viejo 
El Limon 
La India (DEV) 
Mara Rosa (DEV) 
Balcooma 
Gwalia Deeps 
Jaguar Nickel (DEV) 
King of the Hills 
Meekatharra 
South Laverton 
Southern Cross 
Wembley Durack (DEV) 
Inata 
Taparko(26) 
Prestea 
Wassa 

ROYALTY/METAL STREAM  

OPERATOR 

LOCATION 

   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   United States 
   West Vault Mining/Clover Nevada    United States 
   United States 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   United States 
   SSR Mining 
   United States 
   Waterton Precious Metals Fund 

   Americas Silver 
   KGHM 
   Waterton Precious Metals Fund 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Coeur Mining 
   Sabina Gold & Silver 
   Agnico Eagle/Yamana 

   Kinross 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Nevada Gold Mines LLC 
   Kinross 

   1.75% - 2.5% NSR(7) 
   0.40 - 5.0% GSR(8) 
   0.40 - 5.0% GSR(8) 
   0.71% GSR   
   4.91% NVR 
   4.52% NVR (9) 
   1.0 - 2.0% NSR(10,11) 
   0.6 - 0.9% NSR(12) 
   0.9% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.8% NSR 
   2.0% NSR 
   3.0% NSR(13,14) 
   2.94% NSR(13,15) 
   3.0% NSR(16) 
   3.0% NSR 
   3.0% NSR 
   2.0% GPR 
   0.0 - 2.0% GSR(17) 
   1.95% GSR(18) 
   1.0 - 1.5% NSR(19) 
   0.00013 x quarterly avg. gold price    Kirkland Lake 
   2.0% NSR 
   2.0% NSR 
   35% of payable gold(20) 
   7.5% NPI 
   6.5% of gold produced(21) 
   0.97% NSR 
   3.25% NSR 
   2.0% NSR 
   100% of payable gold(22) 
   1.4% NSR(23) 
   3.0% NSR 
   2.0% NSR 
   7.5% of payable gold(24) 
   3.0% NSR 
   3.0% NSR 
   2.75% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR(25) 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 
   1.0% NSR 
   2.5% GSR 
   2.0% GSR       
   10.5% of payable gold (27) 
   10.5% of payable gold (27) 

   Capstone Mining 
   Agnico Eagle 
   Centerra Gold 
   Anaconda Mining 
   New Gold 
   Barrick 
   Pan American 
   Newmont 
   Teck 
   Newmont 
   Orvana 
   Cerrado Gold 
   Barrick/Newmont 
   Calibre 
   Condor Gold 
   Amarillo Gold 
   Consolidated Tin 
   St. Barbara 
   Washington H. Soul Pattinson 
   Red 5 
   Westgold Resources 
   Saracen 
   Shandong Tianye 
   Westgold Resources 
   Balaji Group 
   Nord Gold 
   Golden Star Resources 
   Golden Star Resources 

   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 

   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   United States 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Canada 
   Mexico 
   Mexico 
   Chile 
   Chile 
   Bolivia 
   Argentina 
   Dominican Republic 
   Nicaragua 
   Nicaragua 
   Brazil 
   Australia 
   Australia 
   Australia 
   Australia 
   Australia 
   Australia 
   Australia 
  Australia 
   Burkina Faso 
   Burkina Faso 
   Ghana 
   Ghana 

Tons of 
Ore 
(M) 
  18.950   
  17.277 
  78.662 
  26.714 
  16.065 
  69.225 
  4.897 

  27.254   
  35.616 
  4.729 
  173.425 
  7.557 

  20.665 
  84.310 
  1.726 
  0.768 
  32.850 
  13.623 
  43.531 
  4.829 
  11.509 
  10.237 
  210.572 
  0.979 
  85.507 
  18.017 
  48.171 
  486.670 
  346.814 
  198.103 
  2.240 
  1.327 
  78.264 
  2.253 
  7.606 
  26.235 
  0.762 
  14.007 
  1.323 
  39.683 
  5.524 
  25.144 
  10.538 
  0.362 
  6.352 
  6.504 
  0.856 
  18.406 

Gold 
Grade 
(opt) 

  0.023   
  0.020 
  0.040 
  0.017 
  0.016 
  0.044 
  0.016 

  0.081   
  0.017 
  0.288 
  0.014 
  0.064 

  0.022 
  0.005 
  0.014 
  0.060 
  0.026 
  0.184 
  0.028 
  0.116 
  0.009 
  0.067 
  0.011 
  0.037 
  0.031 
  0.059 
  0.024 
  0.017 
  0.003 
  0.013 
  0.054 
  0.148 
  0.072 
  0.127 
  0.089 
  0.034 
  0.002 
  0.170 
  0.008 
  0.036 
  0.082 
  0.071 
  0.096 
  0.055 
  0.054 
  0.074 
  0.353 
  0.077 

RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 
Gold 
Contained 
Ozs(6) 
(M) 

  0.436 
  0.347 
  3.168 
  0.466 
  0.262 
  3.049 
  0.080 

  2.218 
  0.588 
  1.364 
  2.356 
  0.483 

  0.451 
  0.413 
  0.024 
  0.046 
  0.855 
  2.503 
  1.239 
  0.562 
  0.100 
  0.686 
  2.407 
  0.036 
  2.636 
  1.068 
  1.178 
  8.080 
  1.040 
  2.674 
  0.121 
  0.196 
  5.670 
  0.286 
  0.675 
  0.902 
  0.001 
  2.380 
  0.010 
  1.448 
  0.454 
  1.786 
  1.010 
  0.020 
  0.340 
  0.483 
  0.302 
  1.410 

23 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
PROPERTY 
Gold Hill 

Hasbrouck Mountain 
(DEV) 
Relief Canyon (DEV) 
Kutcho Creek (DEV) 
Rainy River   
Dolores 
Peñasquito 
Don Mario 
Don Nicolas 
Pueblo Viejo 
La India (DEV) 
Balcooma 
Jaguar Nickel (DEV) 
Khoemacau (DEV) 

PROPERTY 
Robinson 
Kutcho Creek (DEV) 
Mount Milligan 
Voisey’s Bay 
Don Mario 
La Fortuna (DEV) 
Balcooma 
Jaguar Nickel (DEV) 
Las Cruces 

PROPERTY 
Peñasquito 
Balcooma 

Operators’ Estimated Proven and Probable Silver Reserves 
As of December 31, 2019(1) 

Silver(28) 

  ROYALTY/METAL STREAM   
  1.0 - 2.0% NSR(10,11) 
  0.6 - 0.9% NSR(12) 

  Kinross 

OPERATOR 

   LOCATION 
 United States 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

 RESERVES
(3)(4)(5) 

Silver 

 Average 
  Tons of    Silver    Contained 
  Grade    Ozs(6) 
  Ore 
   (opt) 
(M) 
(M) 
  1.230 
  4.897      0.251 

  1.5% NSR 
  3.0% NSR(16) 
  2.0% NSR 
  60% of silver produced (21) 
  2.0% NSR 
  2.0% NSR 
  3.0% NSR 
  2.0% NSR 
  75% of payable silver(24) 
  3.0% NSR 
  1.5% NSR 
  1.5% NSR 
  80% of payable silver(29) 

  West Vault Mining/Clover Nevada United States 
 United States 
  Americas Silver 
 Canada 
  Kutcho Copper 
 Canada 
  New Gold 
 Mexico 
  Pan American 
 Mexico 
  Newmont 
 Bolivia 
  Orvana 
 Argentina 
  Cerrado Gold 
 Dominican Republic  
  Barrick/Newmont 
  Condor Gold 
 Nicaragua 
 Australia 
  Consolidated Tin 
 Australia 
  Washington H. Soul Pattinson 
 Botswana 
  Khoemacau Copper Mining 

  35.616      0.297 
  20.665      0.037 
  11.509      1.008 
  85.507      0.073 
  48.171      0.762 
    486.670      0.969 
  2.240      1.438 
  1.327      0.302 
  78.264      0.469 
  7.606      0.156 
  0.762      0.498 
  1.323      2.268 
  33.521      0.567 

  10.569 
  0.760 
  11.600 
  6.266 
  36.700 
  471.360 
  3.221 
  0.401 
  36.700 
  1.185 
  0.380 
  3.000 
  19.011 

Operators’ Estimated Proven and Probable Base Metal Reserves 
As of December 31, 2019(1) 

Copper(30) 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

 RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 

  Average   

 ROYALTY/METAL STREAM  
 3.0% NSR 
 2.0% NSR 
 18.75% of payable copper(20) 
 2.7% NVR 
 3.0% NSR 
 1.4% NSR(23) 
 1.5% NSR 
 1.5% NSR 
 1.5% NSR 

OPERATOR 

  LOCATION   
  United States 
 KGHM 
  Canada 
 Kutcho Copper 
 Canada 
 Centerra Gold 
  Canada 
 Vale 
  Bolivia 
 Orvana 
  Chile 
 Newmont 
 Consolidated Tin 
  Australia 
 Washington H. Soul Pattinson  Australia 
 First Quantum 

  Spain 

  Grade 

  Contained Lbs(6) 
(M) 

  Tons of   Base Metal   Base Metal 
  Ore 
(M) 
  84.310   
  11.509   
   210.572 
  31.857   
  2.240   
   198.103   
  0.762   
  1.323   
  1.874   

(%) 
0.41%   
2.01%   
0.23%   
0.93%   
1.89%   
0.49%   
2.13%   
0.42%   
4.82%   

  692.343 
  463.000 
  959.000 
  590.221 
  84.723 
  1,959.099 
  32.466 
  11.023 
  180.757 

Lead(31) 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

  RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 

  Average   
Tons of    Base Metal  

  Grade 

Base Metal 
  Contained Lbs(6) 
(M) 
  3,261.055 
  7.879 

(%) 
0.34%   
0.52%   

ROYALTY 

OPERATOR 

LOCATION 

Ore 
(M) 

     2.0% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 

     Newmont 
   Consolidated Tin 

    Mexico 
   Australia 

       483.474   
  0.762   

24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
   
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Zinc(32) 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

  RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 

PROPERTY 
Kutcho Creek (DEV) 
Peñasquito 
Balcooma 
Jaguar Nickel (DEV) 

ROYALTY 

   2.0% NSR 
   2.0% NSR   
   1.5% NSR 
   1.5% NSR 

OPERATOR 

  LOCATION 
   Canada 
   Kutcho Copper 
   Mexico 
   Newmont 
   Consolidated Tin 
   Australia 
   Washington H. Soul Pattinson    Australia 

Nickel(33) 

  Average   
  Tons of     Base Metal 

  Grade 

Ore 
(M) 
  11.509   
  483.474   
  0.762   
  1.323   

(%) 
3.19%   
0.76%   
1.92%   
6.25%   

Base Metal 
  Contained Lbs(6) 
(M) 

  734.000 
  7,389.628 
  29.274 
  165.347 

PROPERTY 
Voisey’s Bay 

ROYALTY 

OPERATOR 

LOCATION 

    2.7% NVR 

    Vale 

     Canada 

  PROVEN +   
   PROBABLE 
Tons of  
Ore 
(M) 
  31.857   

  RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 
Base Metal 

  Average   
  Base Metal   Contained Lbs(6) 
  Grade (%)  
2.11%   

(M) 
  1,345.172 

Cobalt(34) 

PROVEN + 
PROBABLE 

  RESERVES(3)(4)(5) 

PROPERTY 
Voisey’s Bay 

ROYALTY 

OPERATOR 

LOCATION 

     2.7% NVR 

     Vale 

     Canada 

  Average   
  Tons of     Base Metal  

Ore 
(M) 
  31.857   

  Grade 

(%) 
0.12%   

Base Metal 
  Contained Lbs(6) 
(M) 

  79.410 

1.  Reserves have been reported by the operators of record as of December 31, 2019, with the exception of the following properties 
where reserves have been reported by the operators of record or their predecessors in interest and are unadjusted for production 
since these dates: Mara Rosa - May 31, 2020; Don Mario - September 30, 2019; Dolores, Gwalia Deeps, King of the Hills, 
Meekatharra, Relief Canyon and South Laverton - June 30, 2019; La India - January 25, 2019; Wharf - December 31, 2018; 
Wembley Durack - June 30, 2018; Khoemacau - April 17, 2018; Pine Cove, Taparko and Williams - December 31, 2017; 
Jaguar Nickel - June 30, 2017; Kutcho Creek - June 15, 2017; Bald Mountain, Gold Hill, Inata and Robinson - December 31, 
2016; Southern Cross - July 24, 2016; Back River - August 15, 2015; Hasbrouck Mountain - June 3, 2015; La Fortuna, Pinson 
and Ruby Hill - December 31, 2014; Don Nicolas - December 31, 2011; and Balcooma - June 30, 2011. 

2.  Gold reserves were calculated by the operators at the following per ounce prices:    A$1,800 - King of the Hills; A$1,725 - 
Meekatharra; A$1,600 - Southern Cross and South Laverton; $1,600 - Pine Cove; $1,500 - Don Mario; A$1,350 - Gwalia 
Deeps; $1,350 - El Limon; $1,300 - Andacollo, Dolores, La Fortuna, Mara Rosa, Pinson, Prestea, Relief Canyon and Wassa; 
$1,275 - Rainy River; $1,250 - Back River, Holt, Inata, La India, Marigold, Mount Milligan, Robinson, Taparko and Wharf; 
$1,225 - Hasbrouck Mountain; $1,200 - Bald Mountain, Canadian Malartic, Cortez, Gold Hill, Goldstrike, LaRonde Zone 5, 
Leeville, Peñasquito, Pueblo Viejo, Twin Creeks and Williams; and $1,100 - Don Nicolas and Ruby Hill. No gold price was 
reported for Balcooma, Jaguar Nickel, Kutcho Creek, or Wembley Durack. 

3. 

Set forth below are the definitions of proven and probable reserves used by the SEC.    “Reserve” is that part of a mineral 
deposit  which  could  be economically  and  legally  extracted  or  produced  at the  time  of the  reserve  determination.  “Proven 
(Measured)  Reserves”  are  reserves  for  which  (a)  quantity  is  computed  from  dimensions  revealed  in  outcrops,  trenches, 
workings  or  drill  holes;  grade  and/or  quality  are  computed  from  the  results  of  detailed  sampling;  and  (b)  the  sites  for 
inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that the size, shape, 
depth and mineral content of the reserves are well established. “Probable (Indicated) Reserves” are reserves for which the 
quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the 
sites  for  inspection,  sampling  and  measurement  are  farther  apart  or  are  otherwise  less  adequately  spaced.  The  degree  of 
assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of 
observation. 

4.  Certain reserve estimates are provided by operators that are foreign issuers and are not based on the SEC's definitions for 
proven and probable reserves. For Canadian issuers, definitions of "mineral reserve," "proven mineral reserve," and "probable 

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
mineral reserve" conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum definitions of these terms as of the 
effective  date  of  estimation  as  required  by  National  Instrument  43-101  of  the  Canadian  Securities  Administrators.  For 
Australian issuers, definitions of "mineral reserve," "proven mineral reserve," and "probable mineral reserve" conform with 
the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee 
of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, 
as amended ("JORC Code"). We do not reconcile the reserve estimates provided by the operators with definitions of reserves 
used by the SEC. 

The reserves reported are either estimates received from the various operators or are based on documentation provided to us 
or are derived from publicly available information from the operators of the various properties or various National Instrument 
43-101 or JORC Code reports filed by operators. We are not able to reconcile the reserve estimates prepared in reliance on 
National Instrument 43-101 or JORC Code with definitions of the SEC. 

“Contained ounces” or “contained pounds” do not take into account recovery losses in mining and processing the ore. 

5. 

6. 

7.  NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce - royalty rate): Below $375 - 1.75%; >$375 to $400 - 2.0%; >$400 to 
$425 - 2.25%; >$425 - 2.5%. All price points are stated in 1986 dollars and are subject to adjustment in accordance with a 
blended index comprised of labor, diesel fuel, industrial commodities and mining machinery. 

8.  GSR1 and GSR 2 sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce - royalty rate): Below $210 - 0.40%; $210 to $229.99 - 
0.50%; $230 to $249.99 - 0.75%; $250 to $269.99 - 1.30%; $270 to $309.99 - 2.25%; $310 to $329.99 - 2.60%; $330 to 
$349.99 - 3.00%; $350 to $369.99 - 3.40%; $370 to $389.99 - $3.75%; $390 to $409.99 - 4.0%; $410 to $429.99 - 4.25%; 
$430 to $449.99 - 4.50%; $450 to $469.99 - 4.75%; $470 and higher - 5.00%. 

9.  NVR1C is the Crossroads portion of NVR1. 

10.  The  royalty  is  capped  at  $10  million.  As  of  June  30,  2020,  royalty  payments  of  approximately  $7.78  million  have  been 

received. 

11.  The 1.0% to 2.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty will pay 2.0% when the price of gold is above $350 per ounce and 1.0% when 
the price of gold falls to $350 per ounce or below. The 0.6% to 0.9% NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce - 
royalty rate): Below $300 - 0.6%; $300 to $350 - 0.7%; > $350 to $400 - 0.8%; > $400 - 0.9%. The silver royalty rate is based 
on the price of gold.   

12.  The  0.6%  to  0.9%  sliding-scale NSR  applies  to the  M-ACE  claims.  The  operator  did  not  break out  reserves  or  resources 

subject to the M-ACE claims royalty. 

13.  Royalty only applies to Section 29 which currently holds about 95% of the reserves reported for the property. 

14.  A Cordilleran royalty of 5% NSR applies to a portion of Section 28. 

15.  Different Rayrock royalty rates apply to Sections 28, 32 and 33; these rates vary depending on pre-existing royalties. The 
Rayrock royalties take effect once 200,000 ounces of gold have been produced from open pit mines on the property. As of 
June 30, 2020, approximately 103,000 ounces have been produced. 

16.  Reserves represent our interest based on our royalty ground covering approximately 69% of the resource footprint by area. 

17.  NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce - royalty rate): $0.00 to under $350 - 0.0%; $350 to under $400 - 0.5%; 

$400 to under $500 - 1.0%; $500 or higher - 2.0%. 

18.  Goose Lake royalty applies to production above 400,000 ounces. 

19.  NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce - royalty rate): $0.00 to $350 - 1.0%; above $350 - 1.5%. 

20.  Centerra  Gold  will  deliver  35%  of  payable  gold  produced,  subject  to  a  fixed  payable  percentage  of  97%,  and  18.75%  of 
payable copper produced, subject to a minimum payable percentage of 95%. The purchase price for gold is equal to the lesser 
of $435 per ounce delivered or the prevailing market price and the purchase price for copper is 15% of the spot price per 
metric  tonne  delivered.  As  of  June  30,  2020,  approximately  516,500  ounces  of  payable  gold  and  34.7  million  pounds  of 
payable copper have been delivered. 

26 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21.  New Gold will deliver: (a) gold in amounts equal to 6.50% of gold produced until 230,000 ounces have been delivered, and 
3.25% of gold produced thereafter, and (b) silver in amounts equal to 60% of silver produced until 3.10 million ounces have 
been delivered, and 30% of silver produced thereafter, in each case at a purchase price equal to 25% of the spot price per 
ounce delivered. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 38,700 ounces of payable gold and 410,500 ounces of payable silver 
have been delivered. 

22.  Teck  will  deliver  gold in  amounts  equal  to  100%  of  payable  gold  until  900,000  ounces  have  been  delivered,  and  50%  of 
payable gold thereafter, subject to a fixed payable percentage of 89%, at a purchase price equal to 15% of the monthly average 
gold price for the month preceding the delivery date for each ounce delivered. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 237,100 
ounces of payable gold have been delivered. 

23.  The  royalty  covers  approximately  30%  of  the  La  Fortuna  deposit.  Reserves  attributable  to  our  royalty  represent  3/7  of 

Newmont's reporting of 70% of the total reserve. 

24.  Barrick will deliver: (a) gold in amounts equal to 7.50% of Barrick’s 60% interest in gold produced until 990,000 ounces have 
been delivered, and 3.75% of Barrick’s 60% interest in gold produced thereafter, at a purchase price equal to 30% of the spot 
price per ounce delivered until 550,000 ounces have been delivered, and 60% of the spot price per ounce delivered thereafter; 
and (b) silver in amounts equal to 75% of Barrick’s 60% interest in silver produced, subject to a fixed silver recovery of 70%, 
until 50 million ounces have been delivered, and 37.50% of Barrick’s 60% interest in silver produced thereafter, at a purchase 
price equal to 30% of the spot price per ounce delivered until 23.10 million ounces of silver have been delivered, and 60% of 
the spot price per ounce delivered thereafter. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 226,400 ounces of payable gold and 7.93 
million ounces of payable silver have been delivered. 

25.  At Paddy's Flat an additional royalty of A$10 per ounce applies on production above 50,000 ounces; At Reedy's an additional 
1.5% to 2.5% NSR sliding-scale royalty pays at a rate of 1.5% for the first 75,000 ounces produced in any 12-month period 
and at a rate of 2.5% on production above 75,000 ounces during that 12-month period and a 1.0% NSR royalty applies to the 
Rand area only. At Yaloginda the royalty is 0.45% NSR. 

26.  There is a 0.75% GSR milling royalty that applies to ore that is mined outside of the defined area of the Taparko-Bouroum 

project that is processed through the Taparko facilities up to a maximum of 1.1 million tons per year. 

27.  Golden Star will deliver 10.5% of payable gold produced until 240,000 ounces have been delivered from Wassa and Prestea, 
and 5.5% of payable gold produced thereafter. The purchase price for gold ounces delivered is 20% of the spot gold price 
until the threshold has been met, and 30% of the spot gold price thereafter. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 110,500 ounces 
of payable gold have been delivered from Wassa and Prestea. 

28.  Silver reserves were calculated by the operators at the following prices per ounce: $25.00 - Don Nicolas; $20.00 - Gold Hill; 
$17.50 - Hasbrouck Mountain; $17.00 - Don Mario, Dolores and Rainy River; $16.50 - Pueblo Viejo; $16.00 - Peñasquito; 
and $15.00 - Khoemacau. No silver price was reported for Balcooma, Jaguar Nickel or Kutcho Creek.       

29.  When production commences, KCM will deliver 80% of payable silver produced, subject to a fixed payable percentage of 
90%. At KCM’s option and subject to various conditions, Royal Gold will make an additional advance payment for the right 
to purchase up to an additional 20% of the payable silver. The stream rate will drop by 50% upon the delivery of 32 million 
ounces  of  silver  at  the  80%  stream  level,  and  40  million  ounces  of  silver  at  the  100%  stream  level  if  the  option  is  fully 
exercised. The purchase price is 20% of the spot price of silver. Depending on the achievement by Cupric of mill expansion 
throughput levels above 13,000 tonnes per day (30% above current mill design capacity), we will pay higher ongoing cash 
payments for ounces delivered in excess of specific annual thresholds. 

30.  Copper reserves were calculated by the operators at the following prices per pound: $3.00 - Andacollo, La Fortuna and Mount 
Milligan; $2.95 - Robinson; $2.83 - Voisey's Bay; $2.75 - Las Cruces; and $2.50 - Don Mario and Khoemacau.    No copper 
reserve price was reported for Balcooma, Jaguar Nickel or Kutcho Creek. 

31.  Lead reserve price was calculated by the operators at the following prices per pound: $0.95 - Peñasquito. No lead reserve 

price was reported for Balcooma. 

32.  Zinc reserve price was calculated by the operators at the following prices per pound: $1.15 - Peñasquito.    No zinc reserve 

price was reported for Balcooma, Jaguar Nickel or Kutcho Creek. 

33.  Nickel reserve price was calculated by the operator at the following price per pound: $5.66 - Voisey's Bay. 
34.  Cobalt reserve price was calculated by the operator at the following price per pound: $26.25 - Voisey's Bay.   

27 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 4.   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE 

Not applicable. 

PART II 

ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

Market Information and Holders 

Our common stock is listed and traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “RGLD.” As of July 30, 
2020, we had 773 holders of record of our common stock. This figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares 
held in nominee name. 

Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities 

None. 

Repurchases of Equity Securities 

None. 

ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

2020 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
2018 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

2019 

2017 

2016 

Revenue(1) 
Operating income (loss)(2) 
Net income (loss)   
Net income (loss) attributable to Royal Gold 
common stockholders 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Royal 
Gold common stockholders: 
Basic 
Diluted 
Dividends declared per common share(3) 

    $  498,819     $  423,056     $   459,042     $   440,814     $   359,790 
  $  198,945   $  140,707   $   (74,535)  $   145,942   $ 
  4,816 
  $  196,250   $   89,079   $  (119,351)  $    92,425   $   (82,438)

  $  199,343   $   93,825   $  (113,134)  $   101,530   $   (77,149)

  $
  $
  $

  3.04   $
  3.03   $
  1.11   $

  1.43   $
  1.43   $
  1.05   $

  (1.73)  $ 
  (1.73)  $ 
  0.99   $ 

  1.55   $ 
  1.55   $ 
  0.95   $ 

  (1.18)
  (1.18)
  0.91 

2020 

2019 

As of June 30,  
2018 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2017 

2016 

Stream and royalty interests, net 
Total assets 
Debt 
Total liabilities 
Total Royal Gold stockholders’ equity 

    $   2,318,913      $   2,339,316      $   2,501,117      $   2,892,256      $   2,848,087 
  $   2,766,287   $   2,544,151   $   2,682,016   $   3,094,065   $   3,069,729 
  600,685 
  $ 
  $ 
  783,844 
  $  2,272,217  $   2,136,681    $   2,102,167    $   2,275,377    $   2,229,016 

  586,170    $ 
  773,801   $ 

  351,027    $ 
  540,747   $ 

  214,554    $ 
  373,698   $ 

300,439  $ 
464,168  $ 

(1)  Please  refer  to  Item 7,  MD&A,  of  this  report  for  a  discussion  of  recent  developments  that  contributed  to  our  18%  increase  in 

revenue during fiscal year 2020 when compared to fiscal year 2019. 

28 

 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)  Please refer to Note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for discussion on the impairment recognized at Pascua-

Lama, which was attributable for the operating loss during our fiscal year 2018. 

(3)  The 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016 calendar year dividends were $1.12, $1.06, $1.00, $0.96, and $0.92, respectively, as approved 

by our board of directors.   

ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS 
OF OPERATIONS 

A discussion of the changes in our financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, 
and 2018, has been omitted from this Annual Report, but may be found in Item 7, MD&A, of our Annual Report on Form 
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019, filed with the SEC on August 8, 2019, which is available free of charge on the 
SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and our website at www.royalgold.com. 

Overview 

We acquire and manage precious metal streams, royalties, and similar interests. We seek to acquire existing stream and 
royalty interests or to finance projects that are in production or in the development stage in exchange for stream or royalty 
interests. 

We manage our business under two segments: 

Acquisition and Management of Stream Interests—A metal stream is a purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for 
an upfront deposit payment, the right to purchase all or a portion of one or more metals produced from a mine, at a price 
determined for the life of the transaction by the purchase agreement. As of June 30, 2020, we owned seven stream interests, 
which  are  on  six  producing  properties  and  two  development  stage  properties.  Our  stream  interests  accounted  for 
approximately 72% of our total revenue for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, and 2019. We expect stream 
interests to continue representing a significant portion of our total revenue. 

Acquisition and Management of Royalty Interests—Royalties are non-operating interests in mining projects that provide 
the right to a percentage of revenue or metals produced from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. As of 
June 30, 2020,  we  owned  royalty  interests  on  35  producing  properties,  15 development  stage  properties  and  129 
exploration stage properties, of which we consider 48 to be evaluation stage projects. We use “evaluation stage” to describe 
exploration  stage  properties  that  contain  mineralized  material  and  on  which  operators  are  engaged  in  the  search  for 
reserves. Royalties accounted for approximately 28% of our total revenue for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 
and 2019. 

We do not conduct mining operations on the properties in which we hold stream and royalty interests. Except for our 
interest in the Peak Gold JV, we are not required to contribute to capital costs, exploration costs, environmental costs, or 
other operating costs on those properties.   

In the ordinary course of business, we engage in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing stream and royalty 
interests, to establish new streams and royalties on operating mines, to create new stream and royalty interests through the 
financing of mine development or exploration, or to acquire companies that hold stream and royalty interests. We currently, 
and generally at any time, have acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review, including, for example, our 
engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, our analysis of technical, financial, legal and 
other  confidential  information  of  particular  opportunities,  submission  of  indications  of  interest  and  term  sheets, 
participation in preliminary discussions and negotiations and involvement as a bidder in competitive processes. 

29 

 
 
Our financial results are primarily tied to the price of gold and, to a lesser extent, the prices of silver and copper, together 
with  the  amounts  of  production  from  our  producing  stage  stream  and  royalty  interests.  For  the  fiscal years  ended 
June 30, 2020 and 2019, gold, silver, and copper price averages and percentage of revenue by metal were as follows: 

Metal 
Gold ($/ounce) 
Silver ($/ounce) 
Copper ($/pound) 
Other 

Fiscal Year ended   

June 30, 2020 

June 30, 2019 

Average 
Price 

  1,560  
  16.90  
  2.57  
N/A  

Percentage of 
Revenue 
79% 
9% 
9% 
3% 

  $ 
  $ 
  $ 

Average 
Price 

  1,263  
  15.00  
  2.79  
N/A  

Percentage 
of Revenue 
78% 
9% 
9% 
4% 

  $ 
  $ 
  $ 

Operators’ Production Estimates by Stream and Royalty Interest for Calendar 2020 

We received annual production estimates from many of the operators of our producing mines during the first calendar 
quarter of 2020. In some instances, an operator may revise its original calendar year guidance throughout the year. The 
following table shows such production estimates for our principal producing properties for calendar 2020 as well as the 
actual production reported to us by the various operators through June 30, 2020. The estimates and production reports are 
prepared by the operators. We do not participate in the preparation or calculation of the operators’ estimates or production 
reports  and  have  not  independently  assessed  or  verified,  and  disclaim  all  responsibility  for,  the  accuracy  of  such 
information. Please refer to Part I, Item 2, Properties, of this report for further discussion on any updates at our principal 
producing properties. 

Operators’ Estimated and Actual Production by Stream and Royalty Interest for Calendar 2020 
Principal Producing Properties   

Stream/Royalty 
Stream: 

Calendar 2020 Operator’s Production 
Estimate(1) 
Silver 
(oz.) 

Gold 
(oz.) 

Base Metals 
(lbs.) 

Calendar 2020 Operator’s Production 
Actual(2) 
Silver 
(oz.) 

Gold 
(oz.) 

Base Metals 
(lbs.) 

Andacollo(3) 
Mount Milligan(4) 

53,000 
   140,000 - 160,000    

Copper 

Pueblo Viejo(5) 
Wassa(6) 

Royalty: 

Cortez GSR1 
Cortez GSR2 
Cortez GSR3 
Cortez NVR1 
Cortez NVR1C   
Peñasquito(7) 

Lead 
Zinc 

530,000 - 580,000   
165,000 - 170,000   

N/A 

  80 - 90 Million   

66,500 
109,000 
145,700 
113,200 
29,900 
510,000 

  28 million 

   190 million   
   360 million   

27,500 
69,300   

254,000   
85,100   

61,800   
48,300   
52,400   
88,700   
400   
185,000   

   39.1 Million 

N/A 

  13.1 Million    

   84 Million 
   178 Million 

(1)  Production estimates received from our operators are for calendar 2020.    There can be no assurance that production estimates 
received from our operators will be achieved.    Please also refer to our cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements 
following this MD&A, as well as the Risk Factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, of this report for information regarding factors that 
could affect actual results. 

(2)  Actual  production  figures  shown  are  from  our  operators  and  cover  the  period  January 1,  2020  through  June  30, 2020,  unless 

otherwise noted in footnotes to this table. 

(3)  The estimated and actual production figures shown for Andacollo are contained gold in concentrate. 

(4)  The estimated and actual production figures shown for Mount Milligan are payable gold and copper in concentrate.     

30 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
   
 
   
   
 
   
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
  
   
  
   
 
 
 
  
   
  
   
 
 
 
 
(5)  The estimated and actual production figures shown for Pueblo Viejo are payable gold in doré and represent Barrick’s 60% interest 

in Pueblo Viejo.    The operator did not provide estimated or actual silver production. 

(6)  The estimated and actual production figures shown for Wassa is payable gold in doré.   

(7)  The estimated and actual gold and silver production figures shown for Peñasquito are payable gold and silver in concentrate and 

doré.    The estimated and actual lead and zinc production figures shown are payable lead and zinc in concentrate.         

COVID-19 and current economic environment 

Several  of  our  operating  counterparties  announced  temporary  operational  curtailments  or  the  withdrawal  or  review  of 
previously disclosed guidance due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The economic and societal impacts associated 
with COVID-19 are fluid and changing rapidly, and we are currently unable to predict the nature or extent of any impact 
on  our  results  of  operations  and  financial  condition.  We  will  continue  to  monitor  any  further  developments  that  the 
COVID-19 pandemic may have on stream or royalty interests as part of our regular asset impairment analysis. 

Historical Production 

The following table discloses historical production for the past two fiscal years for the principal producing properties that 
are subject to our stream and royalty interests, as reported to us by the operators of the mines. We do not participate in the 
preparation  or  calculation  of  the  operators’  production  reports  and  have  not  independently  assessed  or  verified,  and 
disclaim all responsibility for, the accuracy of such information. 

Historical Production(1) by Stream and Royalty Interest 
Principal Producing Properties 
For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 

Stream/Royalty 
Stream: 

Mount Milligan 

Andacollo 
Pueblo Viejo 

Wassa 
Royalty: 

Peñasquito 

Cortez GSR1 
Cortez GSR2 
Cortez GSR3 
Cortez NVR1 

Metal 

2020 

2019 

Gold 
Copper 
Gold 
Gold 
Silver 
Gold 

Gold 
Silver 
Lead 
Zinc 
Gold 
Gold 
Gold 
Gold 

  63,700 oz. 

  12.7 Mlbs. 

  48,100 oz. 
  43,300 oz. 

  1.8 Moz. 

  15,000 oz. 

  312,200 oz. 

  27.8 Moz. 
  182.3 Mlbs. 
  393.9 Mlbs. 
  91,300 oz. 
  82,000 oz. 
  171,800 oz. 
  146,500 oz. 

  61,700 oz. 

  8.3 Mlbs. 

  55,000 oz. 
  41,000 oz. 

  2.1 Moz. 

  17,500 oz. 

  158,800 oz. 

  16.4 Moz. 
  117.4 Mlbs. 
  216.2 Mlbs. 
  84,600 oz. 
  12,100 oz. 
  96,700 oz. 
  77,400 oz. 

(1)  Historical production for our stream interests relates to the amount of stream metal sales for each fiscal year presented and may 
differ from stream deliveries discussed in Item 2, Properties, or from the operators’ public reporting. For our royalty interests, 
historical production relates to the payable metal amounts as reported to us by the operators of the mines subject to our royalty rate 
for each fiscal year presented. 

Critical Accounting Policies 

Listed below are the accounting policies we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty 
regarding  the  estimates  or  assumptions  involved  and  the  magnitude  of  the  asset,  liability,  revenue  or  expense  being 
reported. Please also refer to Note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for a discussion on recently adopted 
and issued accounting pronouncements. 

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
      
   
   
   
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
Use of Estimates 

The  preparation  of  our  financial  statements,  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“U.S. 
GAAP”), requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported 
amounts of assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and 
expenses during the reporting period. 

We rely on reserve estimates reported by the operators of the properties on which we hold stream and royalty interests.   
These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the potential impairments of long-lived assets and the ability to 
realize income tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions also affect the rate at 
which  we  recognize  revenue  or  charge  depreciation,  depletion  and  amortization  to  earnings.  On  an  ongoing  basis, 
management evaluates these estimates and assumptions; however, actual amounts could differ from these estimates and 
assumptions. Differences between estimates and actual amounts are adjusted and recorded in the period that the actual 
amounts are known. 

Stream and Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties and Related Depletion 

Stream  and  royalty  interests include  acquired  stream  and royalty  interests  in  production,  development  and  exploration 
stage properties. The costs of acquired stream and royalty interests are capitalized as tangible assets as such interests do 
not meet the definition of a financial asset under U.S. GAAP. 

Production stage stream and royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the mineral 
property  (as  stream  sales  occur  or  royalty  payments  are  recognized),  which  are  estimated  using  proven  and  probable 
reserves  as  provided  by  the  operator.  Development  stage  mineral  properties,  which  are  not  yet  in  production,  are  not 
depleted until the property begins production. Exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no proven and probable 
reserves, are not depleted. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to proven and 
probable reserves, the mineral property is depleted over its life, using proven and probable reserves. Exploration costs are 
expensed when incurred. 

Asset Impairment 

We  evaluate  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  related 
carrying amounts of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The recoverability of the carrying value of stream 
and royalty interests in production and development stage mineral properties is evaluated based upon estimated future 
undiscounted net cash flows from each stream and royalty interest using estimates of proven and probable reserves and 
other relevant information received from the operators. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of royalty 
interests in exploration stage mineral properties in the event of significant decreases in the price of gold, silver, copper and 
other metals, and whenever new information regarding the mineral properties is obtained from the operator indicating that 
production will not likely occur or may be reduced in the future, thus potentially affecting the future recoverability of our 
stream or royalty interests. Impairments in the carrying value of each property are measured and recorded to the extent 
that the carrying value in each property exceeds its estimated fair value, which is generally calculated using estimated 
future discounted cash flows. 

Estimates  of  gold,  silver,  copper,  and  other  metal  prices,  and  operators’  estimates  of  proven  and  probable  reserves  or 
mineralized material related to our stream or royalty properties are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which may 
affect the recoverability of our investment in these stream and royalty interests in mineral properties. It is possible that 
changes could occur to these estimates, which could adversely affect the net cash flows expected to be generated from 
these stream and royalty interests. Refer to Note 4 to consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the impairment 
assessment results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. 

Revenue 

Under U.S. GAAP, a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct good or service (or 
integrated package of goods and/or services) to a customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct 

32 

performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. In accordance with 
this guidance, revenue attributable to our stream interests and royalty interests is generally recognized at the point in time 
that control of the related metal production transfers to our customers. The amount of revenue we recognize further reflects 
the consideration to which we are entitled under the respective stream or royalty agreement. A more detailed summary of 
our revenue recognition policies for our stream and royalty interests is discussed below.   

Stream Interests 

A metal stream is a purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for an upfront deposit payment, the right to purchase 
all or a portion of one or more of the metals produced from a mine, at a price determined for the life of the transaction by 
the purchase agreement. Gold, silver and copper received under our metal streaming agreements are taken into inventory, 
and then sold primarily using average spot rate gold, silver and copper forward contracts. The sales price for these average 
spot rate forward contracts is determined by the average daily gold, silver or copper spot prices during the term of the 
contract, typically a consecutive number of trading days between ten days and three months (depending on the frequency 
of deliveries under the respective streaming agreement and our sales policy in effect at the time) commencing shortly after 
receipt and purchase of the metal. We settle our forward sales contracts via physical delivery of the metal to the purchaser 
(our  customer)  on  the  settlement  date  specified  in  the  contract.  Under  our  forward  sales  contracts,  there  is  a  single 
performance obligation to sell a contractually specified volume of metal to the purchaser, and we satisfy this obligation at 
the point in time of physical delivery. Accordingly, revenue from our metal sales is recognized on the date of settlement, 
which is the date that control, custody and title to the metal transfer to the purchaser. 

Royalty Interests 

Royalties are non-operating interests in mining projects that provide the right to a percentage of revenue or metals produced 
from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. We are entitled to payment for our royalty interest in a mining 
project based on a contractually specified commodity price (for example, a monthly or quarterly average spot price) for 
the  period  in  which  metal  production  occurred.  As  a  royalty  holder,  we  act  as  a  passive  entity  in  the  production  and 
operations of the mining project, and the third-party operator of the mining project is responsible for all mining activities, 
including  subsequent  marketing  and  delivery  of  all  metal  production  to  their  ultimate  customer.  In  all  of  our  material 
royalty interest arrangements, we have concluded that we transfer control of our interest in the metal production to the 
operator at the point at which production occurs, and thus, the operator is our customer. We have further determined that 
the  transfer  of  each  unit  of  metal  production,  comprising  our  royalty  interest,  to  the  operator  represents  a  separate 
performance  obligation  under  the  contract,  and  each  performance  obligation  is  satisfied  at  the  point  in  time  of  metal 
production by the operator. Accordingly, we recognize revenue attributable to our royalty interests in the period in which 
metal production occurs at the specified commodity price per the agreement, net of any contractually allowable offsite 
treatment, refining, transportation and, if applicable, mining costs. 

Metal Sales 

Gold, silver and copper received under our metal streaming agreements are taken into inventory, and then sold primarily 
using  average  spot  rate  gold,  silver  and  copper  forward  contracts.  The  sales  price  for  these  average  spot  rate  forward 
contracts is determined by the average daily gold, silver or copper spot prices during the term of the contract, typically a 
consecutive number of trading days between 10 days and three months (depending on the frequency of deliveries under 
the  respective  streaming  agreement  and  our  sales  activity  in  effect  at  the  time)  commencing  shortly  after  receipt  and 
purchase of the metal. Temporary modifications may be made to our metal sales guidelines from time to time as required 
to meet our needs. Revenue from gold, silver and copper sales is recognized on the date of the settlement, which is also 
the date that title to the metal passes to the purchaser. 

Cost of Sales 

Cost of sales, which excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization, is specific to our stream agreements and is the 
result of our purchase of gold, silver and copper for a cash payment. The cash payment for gold from Mount Milligan is 
the lesser of $435 per ounce or the prevailing market price of gold when purchased, while the cash payment for our other 
streams is a set contractual percentage of the gold, silver or copper spot price near the date of metal delivery. 

33 

 
 
 
 
Exploration Costs 

Exploration costs are specific to our Peak Gold JV for exploration and advancement of the Peak Gold project as discussed 
further in Note 2 to consolidated financial statements. Exploration costs associated with the exploration and advancement 
of Peak Gold are expensed when incurred.   

Income Taxes 

Our annual tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates in effect and tax planning opportunities available to us in the 
various  jurisdictions  in  which  the  Company  operates.  Significant  judgment  is  required  in  determining  the  annual  tax 
expense, current tax assets and liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our future taxable income, both as a whole 
and in various tax jurisdictions, for purposes of assessing our ability to realize future benefit from our deferred tax assets. 
Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the 
jurisdictions in which we operate or unpredicted results from the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing 
authorities. 

Our  deferred  income  taxes  reflect  the  impact  of  temporary  differences  between  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and 
liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  such  amounts  measured  by  tax  laws  and  regulations.  In  evaluating  the 
realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers both positive and negative evidence that may exist, such as 
earnings  history,  reversal  of  taxable  temporary  differences,  forecasted  operating  earnings  and  available  tax  planning 
strategies in each tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance may be established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount 
that is considered more likely than not to be realized through the generation of future taxable income and other tax planning 
strategies. 

Our operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in 
multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities 
in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. We recognize 
potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions 
based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We adjust these reserves in light 
of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit; however, due to the complexity of some of these 
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution could result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the 
tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period which they 
are determined. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Overview 

At  June 30, 2020,  we  had  current  assets  of  $362.2 million  compared  to  current  liabilities  of  $43.6 million  resulting  in 
working  capital  of  $318.6 million  and  a  current ratio of 8 to 1.  This  compares  to  current  assets of $154.7 million  and 
current liabilities of $33.6 million at June 30, 2019, resulting in working capital of $121.1 million and a current ratio of 
approximately 5 to 1. The increase in our current ratio was primarily attributable to an increase in our cash and equivalents, 
which is discussed further below under “Summary of Cash Flows.” 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, liquidity needs were met from $340.8 million in net cash provided by operating 
activities  and  our  available  cash  resources.  As  of  June 30, 2020,  we  had  $695  million  available  and  $305  million 
outstanding under our revolving credit facility. Working capital, combined with available capacity under our revolving 
credit  facility,  resulted  in  approximately  $1  billion  of  total  liquidity  at  June 30, 2020.  Refer  to  Note 6  of  our  notes  to 
consolidated  financial  statements  and  below  (“Recent  Liquidity  and  Capital  Resource  Developments”)  for  further 
discussion on our debt. On July 2, 2020, we repaid $30 million of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. 
This payment increased the amount available under our revolving credit facility to $725 million and decreased the amount 
outstanding to $275 million. 

34 

We believe that our current financial resources and funds generated from operations will be adequate to cover anticipated 
expenditures for debt service, general and administrative expense costs and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. 
Our current financial resources are also available to fund dividends and for acquisitions of stream and royalty interests, 
including the remaining conditional funding schedule in connection with the Khoemacau silver stream acquisition. Our 
long-term capital requirements are primarily affected by our ongoing acquisition activities. We currently, and generally at 
any time, have acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review. In the event of one or more substantial stream 
or royalty interest or other acquisitions, we may seek additional debt or equity financing as necessary. 

Please refer to our risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this report for a discussion of certain risks that may impact 
our liquidity and capital resources. 

Recent Liquidity and Capital Resource Developments 

Revolving Credit Facility Drawdown 

On April 3, 2020, we drew an additional $200 million on our revolving credit facility. There is no immediate requirement 
for the additional funds. However, due to the uncertain environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact 
on certain operations where we hold a stream or royalty interest, we believe the drawdown was a prudent precautionary 
measure  to  help  ensure  cash  is  readily  available  to  support  continued  business  activities.    We  remain  committed  to 
reducing our debt, and absent the requirement to fund any new business opportunities, we expect to further manage our 
debt levels once the operating environment returns to normal. 

Dividend Increase 

On November 19, 2019, we announced an increase in our annual dividend for calendar 2020 from $1.06 to $1.12, payable 
on a quarterly basis of $0.28 per share. The newly declared dividend is 6% higher than the dividend paid during calendar 
2019. We have steadily increased our annual dividend since calendar 2001. 

Revolving Credit Facility Amendment 

On September 20, 2019, we entered into a third amendment to our revolving credit facility dated as of June 2, 2017. Under 
the amendment, our Swiss subsidiary RGLD Gold was added as a co-borrower and joint and several obligor, certain of the 
Company’s Canadian subsidiaries were added as guarantors, and certain equity pledges that previously had been granted 
in favor of the lenders to support the facility were released, with the result that the facility is now unsecured.   

Summary of Cash Flows 

Operating Activities 

Net  cash  provided  by  operating  activities  totaled  $340.8  million  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30, 2020,  compared  to 
$253.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase in proceeds received 
from our stream interests, net of cost of sales, of approximately $49.5 million and lower income taxes paid of $12.9 million.   

Investing Activities 

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $152.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, compared to cash used 
in  investing  activities  of  $5.6  million  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30, 2019.  The  increase  in  cash  used  in  investing 

35 

 
activities was due to an increase in acquisitions of stream and royalty interests. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, 
we made advance payments totaling $135.7 million for the Khoemacau silver stream acquisition. 

Financing Activities 

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $11.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, compared to cash 
used in financing activities of $216.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in cash used in financing 
activities is primarily due to a decrease in debt repayments (net of borrowings) when compared to the prior fiscal year.   

Contractual Obligations 

Our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2020, are as follows: 

Contractual Obligations 
Revolving credit facility(1) 
Operating leases 
Total 

Payments Due by Period (in thousands) 

Total 
     $    325,972      $ 
  $ 
  9,210      $ 
  $    335,182   $ 

Less than 
1 Year 

1 - 3 Years 

3 - 5 Years 

More than 
5 Years 

  4,258      $ 
  901      $ 
  5,159   $ 

  12,775      $    308,939      $ 
  1,931      $ 
  14,629   $    310,870   $ 

  1,854      $ 

  — 
  4,524 
  4,524 

(1)  Amounts represent principal ($305 million) and estimated interest payments ($21.0 million) assuming no early extinguishment. 

For information on our revolving credit facility, see Note 6 to consolidated financial statements. The above table does not 
include stream commitments as discussed in Note 15 to consolidated financial statements. We believe we will be able to 
fund all current obligations from net cash provided by operating activities. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.   

Results of Operations 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020, Compared with Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, we recorded net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders of $199.3 million, 
or $3.04 per basic share and $3.03 per diluted share, as compared to net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders 
of $93.8 million, or $1.43 per basic and diluted share, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The increase in our earnings 
per share was primarily attributable to (i) an increase in revenue, (ii) a decrease in our interest expense and (iii) discrete 
income tax benefits recognized, primarily attributable to recent Swiss tax reform during the quarter ended September 30, 
2019 and the release of an uncertain tax liability resulting from a settlement agreement with a foreign tax authority. Each 
are discussed further below.   

For  the  fiscal year  ended  June 30, 2020, we  recognized  total  revenue  of  $498.8 million, which  is  comprised of  stream 
revenue of $359.9 million and royalty revenue of $138.9 million, at an average gold price of $1,560 per ounce, an average 
silver  price  of  $16.90  per  ounce  and  an  average  copper  price  of  $2.57  per  pound,  compared  to  total  revenue  of 
$423.1 million,  which  is  comprised  of  stream  revenue  of  $305.8 million  and  royalty  revenue  of  $117.2 million,  at  an 
average gold price of $1,263 per ounce, an average silver price of $15.00 per ounce and an average copper price of $2.79 
per pound, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.   

36 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue  and  the  corresponding  production,  attributable  to  our  stream  and  royalty  interests,  for  the  fiscal year  ended 
June 30, 2020 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 is as follows: 

Revenue and Reported Production Subject to our Stream and Royalty Interests 
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 
(In thousands, except reported production in ozs. and lbs.) 

Stream/Royalty 
Stream(2): 

Mount Milligan 

Pueblo Viejo 

Andacollo 
Wassa 
Other(3) 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2020 

Reported 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2019 

Reported 

      Metal(s)        Revenue 

      Production(1) 

      Revenue 

      Production(1) 

  Gold 
  Copper 

  Gold 
  Silver 
  Gold 
  Gold 

  Gold 
  Silver 

  $    131,425  

  $ 

  101,010  

  63,700 oz. 

  12.7 Mlbs.  

  $ 

  96,978  

  $ 

  82,844 

  $ 
  $ 
  $ 

  74,219  
  23,203  
  34,043  

  43,300 oz. 

  1.8 Moz.  

  $ 
  $ 
  $ 

  69,264 
  22,098 
  30,608 

  48,100 oz. 
  15,000 oz. 

  20,300 oz. 
  188,800 oz. 

  61,700 oz. 

  8.3 Mlbs. 

  41,000 oz. 

  2.1 Moz. 

  55,000 oz. 
  17,500 oz. 

  22,600 oz. 
  144,700 oz. 

  158,800 oz. 

  16.4 Moz. 
  117.4 Mlbs. 
  216.2 Mlbs. 

  96,700 oz. 
N/A  

Total stream revenue 

  $    359,868  

  $ 

  305,824  

Royalty(2): 

Peñasquito 

Cortez 
Other(3) 
Total royalty revenue 

Total revenue 

  Gold 
  Silver 
  Lead 
  Zinc 
  Gold 
  Various 

  $ 

  25,498  

  $ 

  13,865  

  312,200 oz. 

  27.8 Moz.  
  182.3 Mlbs.  
  393.9 Mlbs.  

  22,342  
  $ 
  $ 
  91,111  
  $    138,951  
  $    498,819  

  173,300 oz. 
N/A  

  $ 
  $ 
  $ 
  $ 

  11,383  
  91,984  
  117,232  
  423,056  

(1)  Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our stream and royalty interests, for the fiscal years ended 

June 30, 2020 and 2019, and may differ from the operators’ public reporting. 

(2)  Refer to Item 2, Properties, for further discussion on our principal stream and royalty interests.   

(3) 

Individually, with the exception of the Rainy River stream (5.5% in fiscal year 2020 and 5.2% in fiscal year 2019), no stream or 
royalty included within the “Other” category contributed greater than 5% of our total revenue for either period. 

The increase in our total revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 
2019, resulted primarily from an increase in our stream revenue and an increase in the average gold and silver prices. The 
increase in our stream revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in gold and copper sales at Mount Milligan and 
gold sales at Pueblo Viejo. These increases were partially offset by lower gold sales at Andacollo which was due to a 
decrease in deliveries resulting from a temporary suspension of operations during the December 2019 quarter due to a 
worker’s strike.   

37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Gold and silver ounces and copper pounds purchased and sold during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, as 
well as gold, silver and copper in inventory as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, for our stream interests were as follows: 

Gold Stream 
Mount Milligan 
Andacollo 
Pueblo Viejo 
Wassa 
Other 
Total 

Silver Stream 
Pueblo Viejo 
Other 
Total 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2020 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2019 

     Purchases (oz.)       Sales (oz.) 

     Purchases (oz.)       Sales (oz.) 

  59,900  
  43,900  
  45,000  
  16,500  
  19,500  
  184,800  

  63,700  
  48,100  
  43,300  
  15,000  
  20,300  
  190,400  

  68,500  
  51,900  
  41,200  
  16,600  
  22,500  
  200,700  

As of 
June 30, 2020 

As of 
June 30, 2019 
     Inventory (oz.)       Inventory (oz.) 
  7,100 
  4,300 
  9,500 
  1,500 
  2,200 
  24,600 

  3,300  
  100  
  11,100  
  2,900  
  1,500  
  18,900  

  61,700  
  55,000  
  41,000  
  17,500  
  22,600  
  197,800  

Year Ended   
June 30, 2020 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2019 

Purchases (oz.)   
  1,726,100  
  175,700  
  1,901,800  

Sales (oz.) 
  1,750,400  
  188,800  
  1,939,200  

Purchases (oz.)   
  2,007,000  
  148,900  
  2,155,900  

Sales (oz.) 
  2,071,700  
  144,700  
  2,216,400  

As of 
June 30, 2020 
Inventory (oz.)   
  451,200  
  23,400  
  474,600  

As of 
June 30, 2019 
Inventory (oz.) 
  475,600 
  36,500 
  512,100 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2020 

Year Ended   
June 30, 2019 

As of 
June 30, 2020 

As of 
June 30, 2019 

Copper Stream 
Mount Milligan 

  Purchases (Mlbs.)  
  12.6  

Sales (Mlbs.)    Purchases (Mlbs.)  
  9.1  

  12.7  

Sales (Mlbs.)    Inventory (Mlbs.)  Inventory (Mlbs.)
  0.8 

  0.8  

  8.3  

Our  royalty  revenue  increased  during  the  fiscal year  ended  June 30, 2020,  compared  with  the  fiscal year  ended 
June 30, 2019, primarily due to an increase in production at Peñasquito and Cortez and an increase in the average gold and 
silver prices. Refer to Part I, Item 2, Properties, for discussion and any updates on our principal producing properties. 

Cost  of  sales  increased  to  $83.9 million  for  the  fiscal year  ended  June 30, 2020,  from  $77.5 million  for  the  fiscal year 
ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to increased gold and copper sales from Mount Milligan and an 
increase in gold sales from Pueblo Viejo, partially offset by a decrease in silver sales from Pueblo Viejo. Cost of sales, 
which excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization, is specific to our stream agreements and is the result of RGLD 
Gold’s purchase of gold, silver and copper for a cash payment. The cash payment for gold from Mount Milligan is the 
lesser of $435 per ounce or the prevailing market price of gold when purchased, while the cash payment for our other 
streams is a set contractual percentage of the gold, silver or copper spot price near the date of metal delivery. 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $175.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, from $163.1 
million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.    The increase was primarily attributable to higher gold and copper sales 
at Mount Milligan and an increase in gold sales at Pueblo Viejo. An increase in depletion rates at Mount Milligan as a 
result  of  updated  reserves,  as  discussed  in  Part  I,  Item  2,  Properties,  also  contributed  to  the  increase  in  our  depletion 
expense during the current period. 

We recognized a gain in fair value changes in equity securities of $1.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, 
compared to a loss in fair value changes in equity securities of $6.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The 
change was primarily due to an increase in the fair value of marketable equity securities as discussed further in Note 5 to 
the consolidated financial statements.   

Interest and other expense decreased to $9.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, from $29.7 million for the 
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower interest expense as a result of a decrease 
in  average  debt  amounts  outstanding  during  the  current  period  when  compared  to  the  prior  period.    During  the  prior 
period, we settled the $370 million aggregate principal amount due under our convertible senior notes that matured in June 
2019. Refer to Note 6 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion on our outstanding debt. 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, we recognized an income tax benefit totaling $3.7 million compared with an 
expense of $17.5 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. This resulted in an effective tax rate of (1.9%) during 
the current period, compared with 16.4% in the prior period. The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 

38 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
was primarily impacted by a net step-up of tax assets due to the enactment of the Federal Act on Tax Reform and AHV 
Financing in Switzerland and the release of an uncertain tax liability resulting from a settlement agreement with a foreign 
tax authority.    The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 was primarily impacted by true-ups related to 
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act partially offset by the implementation of the global intangible low-taxed income tax regime. 

Forward-Looking Statements 

This report and our other public communications include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of U.S. federal 
securities laws. Forward-looking statements are any statements other than statements of historical fact. Forward-looking 
statements  are  not  guarantees  of  future  performance,  and  actual  results  may  differ  materially  from  these  statements. 
Forward-looking  statements  are  often  identified  by  words  like  “will,”  “may,”  “could,”  “should,”  “would,”  “believe,” 
“estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “forecast,” “potential,” “intend,” “continue,” “project,” or negatives of these 
words  or  similar  expressions.  Forward-looking  statements  include,  among  others,  the  following:  statements  about  our 
expected financial performance, including revenue, expenses, earnings or cash flow; operators’ expected operating and 
financial  performance,  including  production,  deliveries,  mine  plans  and  reserves,  development,  cash  flows  and  capital 
expenditures; planned and potential acquisitions or dispositions, including funding schedules and conditions; liquidity, 
financing and dividends; our overall investment portfolio; macroeconomic and market conditions including the impacts of 
COVID-19; prices for gold, silver, copper, nickel and other metals; potential impairments; or tax changes. 

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, among others, 
the following: a low-price environment for gold, silver, copper, nickel or other metals; operating activities or financial 
performance of properties on which we hold stream or royalty interests, including variations between actual and forecasted 
performance,  operators’  ability  to  complete  projects  on  schedule  and  as  planned,  changes  to  mine  plans  and  reserves, 
liquidity needs, mining and environmental hazards, labor disputes, distribution and supply chain disruptions, permitting 
and  licensing  issues,  contractual  issues  involving  our  stream  or  royalty  agreements,  or  operational  disruptions  due  to 
COVID-19; risks associated with doing business in foreign countries; our ability to identify, finance, value and complete 
acquisitions; adverse economic and market conditions; changes in laws or regulations governing us, operators or operating 
properties; changes in management and key employees; and other factors described elsewhere in this report. Most of these 
factors are beyond our ability to predict or control.   

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We disclaim any obligation to update any 
forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking 
statements. 

ITEM 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK 

Our earnings and cash flows are significantly impacted by changes in the market price of gold and other metals. Gold, 
silver, copper, and other metal prices can fluctuate significantly and are affected by numerous factors, such as demand, 
production  levels,  economic policies  of  central  banks,  producer hedging,  world  political  and  economic  events  and  the 
strength of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies. 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, we reported revenue of $498.8 million, with an average gold price for the 
period of $1,560 per ounce, an average silver price for the period of $16.90 per ounce and an average copper price of $2.57 
per pound. Approximately 79% of our total recognized revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 were attributable 
to gold sales from our gold producing interests, as shown within the MD&A. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, if 
the price of gold had averaged 10% higher or lower per ounce, we would have recorded an increase or decrease in revenue 
of approximately $41.6 million. 

Approximately 9% of our total reported revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was attributable to silver sales 
from our silver producing interests. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, if the price of silver had averaged 10% higher 
or lower per ounce, we would have recorded an increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $4.4 million. 

Approximately 9% of our total reported revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was attributable to copper sales 
from our copper producing interests. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, if the price of copper had averaged 10% 
higher or lower per pound, we would have recorded an increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $5.0 million. 

39 

 
 
 
ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

Index to Financial Statements 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING 

FIRM 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)   

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Page 

41 
43 

44 
45 
46 
47 

40 

 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Royal Gold, Inc.   

Opinion on the Financial Statements 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Royal Gold, Inc. (the Company) as of June 30, 2020 
and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash 
flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the 
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material 
respects, the financial position of the Company at June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash 
flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting 
principles. 

We  also  have  audited,  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United 
States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020, based on criteria established 
in  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway 
Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated August 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. 

Basis for Opinion 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion 
on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB 
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and 
the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. 

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  PCAOB.  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and 
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, 
whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of 
the  financial  statements,  whether  due  to  error  or  fraud,  and  performing  procedures  that  respond  to  those  risks.  Such 
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 
Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well 
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for 
our opinion. 

Critical Audit Matter 

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements 
that  was  communicated  or  required  to  be  communicated  to  the  audit  committee  and  that:  (1)  relates  to  accounts  or 
disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex 
judgments.  The  communication  of  the  critical  audit  matter  does  not  alter  in  any  way  our  opinion  on  the  consolidated 
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a 
separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. 

Description of 
the Matter 

Impairment Assessment of Stream and Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties   

At June 30, 2020, the Company’s stream and royalty interest balance totaled $2.3 billion. As more 
fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluates its stream 
and royalty interests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the 
carrying  amounts  of  the  asset  or  group  of  assets  may  not  be  recoverable  (“triggering  events”). 
Management evaluates various qualitative factors in determining whether or not events or changes 
in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  carrying  amount  of  an  asset  or  group  of  assets  may  not  be 
recoverable.  The  factors  considered  include,  among  others,  significant  changes  in  estimates  of 
forecasted gold, silver, copper and other metal prices, significant changes in operators’ estimates 
of proven and probable reserves and other relevant information received from the operators, which 

41 

  
How We 
Addressed the 
Matter in Our 
Audit 

may include operational or legal information that indicates production from mineral interests will 
not likely occur or may be significantly reduced in the future.     

Auditing  the  Company’s  impairment  assessment  involved  our  subjective  judgment  because,  in 
determining whether a triggering event occurred, management uses estimates that include, among 
others, assumptions about forecasted gold, silver, copper and other metal prices and total future 
production  using  reserve  or  other  relevant  information  reported  by  the  operators.  Significant 
uncertainty  exists  with  these  assumptions.  Further,  management’s  evaluation  of  any  new 
information indicating that production will not likely occur or may be significantly reduced in the 
future requires significant judgment.     

We  obtained  an  understanding,  evaluated  the  design  and  tested  the  operating  effectiveness  of 
controls  over  the  Company’s  process  over  the  impairment  assessment.  For  example,  we  tested 
controls over the Company’s process for identifying and evaluating potential impairment triggers 
and related significant assumptions and judgments. To test the Company’s impairment assessment, 
our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the significant assumptions, judgments 
and operating data used  in  the  Company’s analysis.  Specifically, we  compared  forecasted gold, 
silver, copper and other metal prices to available market information, and we corroborated reserve 
information to available operator or publicly available information. We involved our specialist and 
searched for and evaluated other publicly available information that corroborates or contradicts the 
reserve estimates or indicates that production from mineral interests will not likely occur or may 
be  significantly  reduced  in  the  future.  We  also  considered  the  professional  qualifications  and 
objectivity of management’s specialists and the reputation of the third-party operators. Further, we 
evaluated  the  reasonableness  of  changes  to  estimated  proven  and  probable  reserves  using  our 
experience with the Company’s stream and royalty interests and industry knowledge.   

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2010. 
Denver, Colorado 
August 6, 2020 

42 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
As of June 30, 
(In thousands, except share data) 

ASSETS 

Cash and equivalents 
Royalty receivables 
Income tax receivable 
Stream inventory 
Prepaid expenses and other 

Total current assets 

Stream and royalty interests, net (Note 4) 
Other assets 
Total assets 

LIABILITIES 

Accounts payable 
Dividends payable 
Income tax payable 
Other current liabilities 
Total current liabilities 

Debt (Note 6) 
Deferred tax liabilities 
Uncertain tax positions   
Other long-term liabilities 

Total liabilities 

  $ 

  $ 

  $ 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) 

EQUITY 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; and 0 shares issued  
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; and 65,531,288 
and 65,440,492 shares outstanding, respectively 
Additional paid-in capital 
Accumulated earnings (losses) 
Total Royal Gold stockholders’ equity 
Non-controlling interests 

Total equity 
Total liabilities and equity 

  $ 

June 30,  
2020 

June 30,  
2019 

  319,128   $ 
  27,689  
  2,435  
  11,671  
  1,227  
  362,150  
  2,318,913  
  85,224  

  119,475 
  20,733 
  2,702 
  11,380 
  389 
  154,679 
  2,339,316 
  50,156 
  2,766,287   $    2,544,151 

  2,484  $ 
18,364 
13,323 
9,384 
  43,555 
300,439 
86,439 
25,427 
8,308 
  464,168 

  2,890
17,372
6,974
6,374
  33,610
214,554
88,961
36,573
  - 
  373,698

  —  

  — 

655 
2,210,429 
61,133 
  2,272,217 
29,902 
  2,302,119 
  2,766,287  $ 

655
2,201,773
(65,747) 
  2,136,681
33,772
  2,170,453
  2,544,151

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
 
     
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
For the Years Ended June 30, 
(In thousands, except share data) 

Revenue (Note 7) 

Costs and expenses 

Cost of sales (excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization) 
General and administrative 
Production taxes 
Exploration costs 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 
Impairment of royalty interests 

Total costs and expenses 

Operating income (loss) 

Fair value changes in equity securities 
Interest and other income 
Interest and other expense 
Income (loss) before income taxes 

June 30,  
2020 
  498,819   $ 

For The Year Ended 
June 30,  
2019 
  423,056   $ 

June 30,  
2018 
  459,042 

  $

  83,890 
  30,195 
  3,824 
  5,190 
  175,434 
  1,341 
  299,874 

  77,535 
  30,488 
  4,112 
  7,158 
  163,056 
  —  
  282,349 

  83,839
  35,464
  2,268
  8,946
  163,696
  239,364
  533,577

  198,945  

  140,707  

  (74,535)

    1,418  
  2,046  
  (9,813) 
  192,596  

  (6,800) 
  2,320  
  (29,650) 
  106,577  

  — 
  4,170 
  (34,214)
  (104,579)

Income tax benefit (expense) 
Net income (loss)   
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests 
Net income (loss) attributable to Royal Gold common stockholders 

    3,654  
  196,250  
  3,093  
  199,343   $ 

  (17,498) 
  89,079  
  4,746  
  93,825   $ 

  (14,772)
  (119,351)
  6,217 
  (113,134)

  $

Net income (loss) 
Adjustments to comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 
Unrealized change in market value of available-for-sale securities 

  $

  196,250   $ 

  89,079   $ 

  (119,351)

  —  

  —  

  (2,080)

Comprehensive income (loss) 
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Royal Gold stockholders 

  $

  196,250  
  3,093  
  199,343   $ 

  89,079  
  4,746  
  93,825   $ 

  (121,431)
  6,217 
  (115,214)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Royal Gold common 
stockholders: 
Basic earnings (loss) per share 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 
Cash dividends declared per common share 

  $

  3.04   $ 

  1.43   $ 

    65,523,024  

    65,394,627  

  $

  3.03   $ 

  1.43   $ 

    65,643,390  

    65,505,535  

  $

  1.11   $ 

  1.05   $ 

  (1.73)
    65,291,855 
  (1.73)
    65,291,855 
  0.99 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

44 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity 
For the Years Ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 
(In thousands, except share data) 

Royal Gold Stockholders 

Common Shares 

Shares 
     65,179,527   $ 

  Amount   

  Additional   
Paid-In 
Capital 

  Accumulated   
Other 
  Comprehensive  
Income (Loss)  

Balance at June 30, 2017 
Stock-based compensation and related share 
issuances 
Distributions from non-controlling interests 
Net loss 
Other comprehensive loss 
Dividends declared 
Balance at June 30, 2018 
Stock-based compensation and related share 
issuances 
Distributions from (to) non-controlling interests 
Net income (loss) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
Dividends declared 
Balance at June 30, 2019 
Stock-based compensation and related share 
issuances 
Distributions from (to) non-controlling interests 
Net income (loss) 
Dividends declared 
Balance at June 30, 2020 

  652    $  2,185,796   $ 

  879   $ 

  88,050   $ 

  44,887   $  2,320,264 

Accumulated 
(Losses) Earnings 

  Non-controlling  
Interests 

Total 
Equity 

  180,514  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  

  2      
  —      
  —      
  —      
  —      

  4,236  
  2,580  
  —  
  —  
  —  

     65,360,041   $ 

  654    $  2,192,612   $ 

  80,451  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  

  1      
  —      
  —      
  —      
  —      

  5,021  
  4,140  
  —  
  —  
  —  

     65,440,492   $ 

  655    $  2,201,773   $ 

  90,796  
  —  
  —  
  —  

  —      
  —      
  —      
  —      

  4,936  
  3,720  
  —  
  —  

     65,531,288   $ 

  655    $  2,210,429   $ 

  —  
  —  
  —  
  (2,080) 
  —  
  (1,201)  $ 

  —  
  —  
  —  
  1,201  
  —  
  —   $ 

  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  —   $ 

  —  
  —  
  (113,134)  
  —  
  (64,814)  
  (89,898)   $ 

  —  
  —  
  93,825  
  (1,201)  
  (68,473)  
  (65,747)   $ 

  —  
  —  
  199,343  
  (72,463)  
  61,133   $ 

  —  
  432  
  (6,217) 
  —  
  —  

  4,238 
  3,012 
     (119,351)
  (2,080)
  (64,814)
  39,102   $  2,141,269 

  —  
  (584) 
  (4,746) 
  —  
  —  

  5,022 
  3,556 
  89,079 
  — 
  (68,473)
  33,772   $  2,170,453 

  —  
  (777) 
  (3,093) 
  —  

  4,936 
  2,943 
  196,250 
  (72,463)
  29,902   $  2,302,119 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

45 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
For the Years Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 

June 30,    
2020 

Year Ended 
June 30,  
2019 

June 30,  
2018 

Cash flows from operating activities: 
Net income (loss)   
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:  

  $    196,250   $ 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization 
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs 
Non-cash employee stock compensation expense 
Fair value changes in equity securities 
Deferred tax benefit 
Impairment of royalty interests 
Other       

Changes in assets and liabilities: 

Royalty receivables 
Stream inventory 
Income tax receivable 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 
Accounts payable 
Income tax payable 
Uncertain tax positions 
Other liabilities 

  175,434  
  1,136  
  9,116  
  (1,418) 
  (32,399) 
  1,341  
  (148) 

  (6,957) 
  (291) 
  268  
  (7,828) 
  (275) 
  6,349  
  (11,146) 
  11,320  

Net cash provided by operating activities 

  $    340,752   $ 

  89,079   $    (119,351)

  163,056  
  15,288  
  6,617  
  6,800  
  (1,745) 
  —  
  (2) 

  5,623  
  (2,069) 
  (2,663) 
  2,793  
  (6,426) 
  (11,281) 
  3,180  
  (15,084) 
  253,166   $ 

  163,696 
  15,046 
  8,279 
— 
  (32,843)
  239,364 
  (197)

  530 
  (1,428)
  22,130 
  2,813 
  5,173 
  12,601 
  7,767 
  5,244 
  328,824 

Cash flows from investing activities: 

Acquisition of stream and royalty interests 
Repayment of Golden Star term loan 
Purchase of equity securities 
Other 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities: 

Repayment of debt 
Borrowings from revolving credit facility 
Net payments from issuance of common stock 
Common stock dividends 
Contributions from non-controlling interest 
Other 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents 
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period 
Cash and equivalents at end of period 

  (155,985) 
  —  
  (461) 
  3,587  

  $   (152,859)  $ 

  (1,055) 
  —  
  (3,573) 
  (967) 
  (5,595)  $ 

  (11,812)
  20,000 
  (17,869)
  (909)
  (10,590)

  (250,000)
  (370,000) 
  (115,000) 
  — 
  220,000  
  200,000  
  (4,042)
  (1,595) 
  (4,180) 
  (64,118)
  (67,477) 
  (71,471) 
  — 
  4,140  
  3,720  
  (1,309) 
  2,829 
  (1,914) 
  11,760   $    (216,846)  $    (315,331)
  2,903 
  30,725  
  199,653  
  85,847 
  119,475  
  88,750  
  88,750 
  $    319,128   $ 

  119,475   $ 

  $ 

See Note 11 for supplemental cash flow information. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

46 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

1.    THE COMPANY 

Royal Gold, Inc. (“Royal Gold”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”), together with its subsidiaries, is engaged in the 
business of acquiring and managing precious metals streams, royalties and similar interests. We seek to acquire existing 
stream and royalty interests or to finance projects that are in production or in the development stage in exchange for stream 
or royalty interests. A metal stream is a purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for an upfront deposit payment, 
the right to purchase all or a portion of one or more metals produced from a mine at a price determined for the life of the 
transaction by the purchase agreement. Royalties are non-operating interests in mining projects that provide the right to 
revenue or metals produced from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. 

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENTLY ADOPTED AND 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 

Use of Estimates 

The  preparation  of  our  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“U.S. 
GAAP”)  requires  us  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities,  and 
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues 
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. 

We rely on reserve estimates reported by the operators of properties on which we hold stream and royalty interests. These 
estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the potential impairments of long-lived assets and the ability to realize 
income tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions also affect the rate at which we 
recognize  revenue  or  charge  depreciation,  depletion  and  amortization  to  earnings.  On  an  ongoing  basis,  management 
evaluates these estimates and assumptions; however, actual amounts could differ from these estimates and assumptions. 
Differences between estimates and actual amounts are adjusted and recorded in the period that the actual amounts are 
known. 

Basis of Consolidation 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Royal Gold, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries and an entity 
over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. All intercompany accounts, transactions, income 
and expenses, and profits or losses have been eliminated on consolidation.   

Peak Gold JV   

Royal Gold, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Royal Alaska, LLC (“Royal Alaska”), and Contango ORE, Inc., through 
its wholly owned subsidiary CORE Alaska, LLC, entered into a limited liability company agreement for the Peak Gold 
JV, a joint venture for exploration and advancement of the Peak Gold Project located near Tok, Alaska. We have identified 
the Peak Gold JV as a Variable Interest Entity, with Royal Alaska as the primary beneficiary, due to the legal structure 
and certain related factors of the limited liability company agreement for the Peak Gold JV. We determined that the Peak 
Gold JV should be fully consolidated at fair value initially. The fair value of our non-controlling interest is $45.7 million 
and  is  based  on  the  underlying  value  of  the  mineral  property  assigned  to  the  Peak  Gold  JV,  which  is  recorded  as  an 
exploration stage property within Stream and royalty interests, net on our consolidated balance sheets. 

As of June 30, 2020, and 2019, Royal Alaska held a 40% membership interest in the Peak Gold JV. Royal Alaska acts as 
the manager of the Peak Gold JV and will be responsible for managing, directing and controlling the overall operations 

47 

 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

unless Royal Alaska is unanimously removed or resigns that position in the manner provided in the Peak Gold JV limited 
liability company agreement. 

Cash and Equivalents 

Cash and equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months 
or less. Cash and equivalents were primarily held in cash deposit accounts as of June 30, 2020 and 2019. 

Stream and Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties and Related Depletion 

Stream  and  royalty  interests include  acquired  stream  and royalty  interests  in  production,  development  and  exploration 
stage properties. The costs of acquired stream and royalty interests are capitalized as tangible assets as such interests do 
not meet the definition of a financial asset under U.S. GAAP. 

Production stage stream and royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the mineral 
property  (as  stream  sales  occur  or  royalty  payments  are  recognized),  which  are  estimated  using  proven  and  probable 
reserves  as  provided  by  the  operator.  Development  stage  mineral  properties,  which  are  not  yet  in  production,  are  not 
depleted until the property begins production. Exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no proven and probable 
reserves, are not depleted. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to proven and 
probable reserves, the mineral property is depleted over its life, using proven and probable reserves. Exploration costs are 
expensed when incurred. 

Asset Impairment 

We  evaluate  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  related 
carrying amounts of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. When impairment indicators are identified, the 
recoverability of the carrying value of stream and royalty interests in production and development stage mineral properties 
is evaluated based upon estimated future undiscounted net cash flows from each stream and royalty interest using estimates 
of proven and probable reserves and other relevant information received from the operators. We evaluate the recoverability 
of the carrying value of royalty interests in exploration stage mineral properties in the event of significant decreases in the 
price of gold, silver, copper and other metals, and whenever new information regarding the mineral properties is obtained 
from the operator indicating that production will not likely occur or may be reduced in the future, thus potentially affecting 
the future recoverability of our stream or royalty interests. Impairments in the carrying value of each property are measured 
and recorded to the extent that the carrying value in each property exceeds its estimated fair value, which is generally 
calculated using estimated future discounted cash flows. 

Estimates  of  gold,  silver,  copper,  and  other  metal  prices,  and  operators’  estimates  of  proven  and  probable  reserves  or 
mineralized material related to our stream or royalty properties are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which may 
affect the recoverability of our investment in these stream and royalty interests in mineral properties. It is possible that 
changes could occur to these estimates, which could adversely affect the net cash flows expected to be generated from 
these stream and royalty interests. Refer to Note 4 for discussion and the results of our impairment assessments for the 
fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018. 

Revenue   

Under U.S. GAAP, a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct good or service (or 
integrated package of goods and/or services) to a customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct 
performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. In accordance with 
this guidance, revenue attributable to our stream interests and royalty interests is generally recognized at the point in time 
that control of the related metal production transfers to our customers. The amount of revenue we recognize further reflects 

48 

ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

the consideration to which we are entitled under the respective stream or royalty agreement. A more detailed summary of 
our revenue recognition policies for our stream and royalty interests is discussed in Note 7.   

Metal Sales 

Gold, silver and copper received under our metal streaming agreements are taken into inventory, and then sold primarily 
using  average  spot  rate  gold,  silver  and  copper  forward  contracts.  The  sales  price  for  these  average  spot  rate  forward 
contracts is determined by the average daily gold, silver or copper spot prices during the term of the contract, typically a 
consecutive number of trading days between 10 days and three months (depending on the frequency of deliveries under 
the  respective  streaming  agreement  and  our  sales  activity  in  effect  at  the  time)  commencing  shortly  after  receipt  and 
purchase of the metal. Revenue from gold, silver and copper sales is recognized on the date of the settlement, which is 
also the date that title to the metal passes to the purchaser. 

Cost of Sales 

Cost of sales, which excludes depreciation, depletion and amortization, is specific to our stream agreements and is the 
result of our purchase of gold, silver and copper for a cash payment. The cash payment for gold from Mount Milligan is 
the lesser of $435 per ounce or the prevailing market price of gold when purchased, while the cash payment for our other 
streams is a set contractual percentage of the gold, silver or copper spot price near the date of metal delivery. 

Production Taxes 

Certain royalty payments are subject to production taxes (or mining proceeds taxes), which are recognized at the time of 
revenue recognition. Production taxes are not income taxes and are included within the costs and expenses section in our 
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). 

Exploration Costs 

Exploration  costs  are  specific  to  the  Peak  Gold  JV  for  the  exploration  and  advancement  of  the  Peak  Gold  Project,  as 
discussed further above under Basis of Consolidation. Costs associated with the Peak Gold JV for the exploration and 
advancement of the Peak Gold Project are expensed when incurred. 

Stock-Based Compensation 

We  recognize  all  share-based  payments  to  employees,  including  grants  of  employee  stock  options,  stock-settled  stock 
appreciation rights (“SSARs”), restricted stock and performance shares, in our financial statements based upon their fair 
values. 

Income Taxes 

Our annual tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates in effect, and tax planning opportunities available to us in the 
various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining the annual tax expense, current 
tax assets and liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our future taxable income, both as a whole and in various 
tax jurisdictions, for purposes of assessing our ability to realize future benefit from our deferred tax assets. Actual income 
taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the jurisdictions in 
which we operate or unpredicted results from the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing authorities. 

Our  deferred  income  taxes  reflect  the  impact  of  temporary  differences  between  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and 
liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  such  amounts  measured  by  tax  laws  and  regulations.  In  evaluating  the 
realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers both positive and negative evidence that may exist, such as 
earnings  history,  reversal  of  taxable  temporary  differences,  forecasted  operating  earnings  and  available  tax  planning 

49 

 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

strategies in each tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance may be established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount 
that is considered more likely than not to be realized through the generation of future taxable income and other tax planning 
strategies. 

Our operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in 
multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities 
in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. We recognize 
potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions 
based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We adjust these reserves in light 
of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit; however, due to the complexity of some of these 
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution could result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the 
tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period which they 
are determined. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. 

Earnings per Share 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to Royal Gold common stockholders 
by  the  weighted  average  number  of  outstanding  common  shares  for  the  period,  considering  the  effect  of  participating 
securities. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts 
that may require issuance of common shares were converted. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing 
net  income  (loss)  available  to  common  stockholders  by  the  diluted  weighted  average  number  of  common  shares 
outstanding during each fiscal year. 

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards 

Recently Adopted 

Leases 

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 
2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires recognition of right-of-use assets and lease payment liabilities on the balance 
sheet by lessees for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. Classification of leases as either a finance or operating 
lease  will  determine  the  recognition,  measurement  and  presentation  of  expenses.  ASU  2016-02  also  requires  certain 
quantitative and qualitative disclosures about material leasing arrangements. 

Subsequently,  in  July  2018,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2018-11,  Leases  (Topic  842):  Targeted  Improvements  (“ASU 
2018-11”).  ASU  2018-11  provides  an  additional  modified  retrospective  transition  method  for  adopting  ASU  2016-02, 
which  eliminates  the  need  for  adjusting  prior  period  comparable  financial  statements  prepared  under  legacy  lease 
accounting guidance. 

ASU 2016-02, together with ASU 2018-11, was effective July 1, 2019. We adopted the new guidance using the modified 
retrospective approach set forth in ASU 2018-11, with the date of initial application on July 1, 2019. Comparative reporting 
periods were not adjusted upon adoption.   

As permitted under the transition guidance, we elected to use the following practical expedients at transition: 

  To not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts were or contained leases; and 
  To not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases. 

50 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

In addition, we elected to use the following practical expedients at and subsequent to adoption in accordance with ASU 
2016-02: 

  Not  to  separate  non-lease  from  lease  components,  and  instead  account  for  each  lease  component  and  any 

associated non-lease components as a single lease component; and   

  Not  to  recognize  right-of-use  assets  and  associated  liabilities  for  short-term  contracts  with  lease  terms  of  12 

months or less. 

Our significant lease arrangements relate to our corporate office spaces and office equipment. Through the implementation 
process, we evaluated our lease arrangements, which included an analysis of contracts, and updating the internal controls 
and processes that are necessary to track and calculate the additional accounting and disclosure requirements as required 
upon adoption of ASU 2016-02. 

We lease office space and office equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through the fiscal year ending 
June 30, 2030. The following amounts were recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at  June 30, 2020 (amounts in 
thousands): 

Operating Leases 

Right-of-use assets - current 
Right-of-use assets - non-current 

Total right-of-use assets 

Lease liabilities - current 
Lease liabilities - non-current 
Total operating lease liabilities 

Classification 

June 30, 2020 

      Prepaid expenses and other        $ 
  Other assets 

  Other current liabilities 
  Other long-term liabilities 

$ 

$ 

  $ 

  823 
  7,087 
  7,910 

  901 
  8,309 
  9,210 

Maturities of operating lease liabilities at June 30, 2020 are as follows (amounts in thousands): 

Fiscal Years: 

2021 
2022 
2023 
2024 
2025 
Thereafter 
Total lease payments 
Less imputed interest 
Total       

$ 

  Operating Leases 
  1,121 
  1,119 
  1,106 
  1,116 
  1,091 
  4,799 
  10,352 
  (1,142)
  9,210 

  $ 

  $ 

Other information pertaining to leases consist of the following: 

Operating Lease Term and Discount Rate 
Weighted average remaining lease term in years 
Weighted average discount rate 

June 30, 2020 

9 
2.5% 

We  did  not  have  any  finance  leases  as  of  June 30, 2020.  The  adoption  of  ASU  2016-02  did  not  impact  accumulated 
earnings  (losses),  our  consolidated  statements  of  operations  and  comprehensive  income  (loss),  or  our  consolidated 
statements of cash flows. 

51 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Recently Issued 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,  Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of 
Credit Losses of Financial Instruments, which, together with subsequent amendments, changes how an entity will record 
credit losses from an “incurred loss” approach to an “expected loss” approach. This update is effective for annual periods 
beginning after December 15, 2019 (i.e. July 1, 2020 for Royal Gold) and interim financial statement periods within those 
years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently undergoing our assessment of the new guidance and the impact it 
will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Based on procedures performed as of June 30, 
2020, the adoption of the new guidance effective July 1, 2020 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements.   

3.    ACQUISITIONS 

Alturas royalty acquisition 

On January 29, 2020, we entered into an agreement with various private individuals for the acquisition of a net smelter 
return (“NSR”) royalty of up to 1.06% (gold) and up to 1.59% (copper) on mining concessions included as part of the 
Alturas project, which is located within the Coquimbo Region of Chile and held by Compañia Minera Salitrales Limitada, 
a subsidiary of Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”). Total consideration for the royalty is up to $41 million, of which 
$11 million was paid on January 29, 2020.    The $11 million paid as part of the funding schedule, plus direct acquisition 
costs,  have  been  recorded  as  an  exploration  stage  royalty  interest  within  Stream  and  royalty  interests,  net  on  our 
consolidated balance sheets. A future payment of up to $20 million is conditioned based on a project construction decision 
by  Barrick  and  the  size  of  the  minable  mineralized material  on  the date  of  the  construction decision. A  further  future 
payment of up to $10 million will be made upon first production from the mining concessions.   

Castelo de Sonhos royalty acquisition   

In August 2019, we entered into an agreement with TriStar Gold Inc. and its subsidiaries (together “TriStar”) to acquire 
(i) up to a 1.5% NSR royalty on the Castelo de Sonhos gold project (“CDS”), located in Brazil, and (ii) warrants to purchase 
up to 19,640,000 common shares of TriStar. Total consideration is $7.5 million and is payable over three payments, of 
which $4.5 million was paid in August 2019, $1.5 million was paid in November 2019, and the final payment of $1.5 
million was paid on March 30, 2020.   

The CDS royalty acquisition has been accounted for as an asset acquisition. The $7.5 million paid as part of the aggregate 
funding schedule, plus direct acquisition costs, have been recorded as an exploration stage royalty interest within Stream 
and royalty interests, net on our consolidated balance sheets.   

The warrants have been recorded within Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets and have a carrying value of 
approximately $4.0 million as of June 30, 2020. The warrants have been classified as a financial asset instrument and are 
recorded at fair value at each reporting date using the Black-Scholes model. Any change in fair value of the warrants at 
subsequent reporting periods will be recorded within Fair value changes in equity securities on our consolidated statements 
of operations and comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2020, the Company holds 19,640,000 warrants at an exercise 
price of C$0.25 per common share with a term of approximately five years. 

Acquisition of Silver Stream on Khoemacau Copper Project 

On February 25, 2019, our wholly owned subsidiary, RGLD Gold AG (“RGLD Gold”), entered into a life of mine purchase 
and sale agreement with Khoemacau Copper Mining (Pty.) Limited (“KCM”) for the purchase of silver produced from the 
Khoemacau Project (“Khoemacau” or the “Project”) located in Botswana and owned by KCM.    Under the purchase and 
sale agreement, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, RGLD Gold will make advance payments totaling $212 

52 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

million toward the purchase of 80% of the silver produced from Khoemacau until certain delivery thresholds are met (the 
“Base Silver Stream”). At KCM’s option and subject to various conditions, RGLD Gold will make up to an additional $53 
million in advance payments for up to the remaining 20% of the silver produced from Khoemacau (the “Option Silver 
Stream”). The stream rate will drop to 40% of silver produced from Khoemacau following delivery to RGLD Gold of 32 
million silver ounces under the Base Silver Stream, or to 50% of the silver produced from Khoemacau following delivery 
of 40 million silver ounces to RGLD Gold should KCM exercise the entire Option Silver Stream. RGLD Gold will pay a 
cash price equal to 20% of the spot silver price for each ounce delivered under the Base Silver Stream and Option Silver 
Stream; however, if KCM achieves mill expansion throughput levels above 13,000 tonnes per day (30% above current 
mill design capacity), RGLD Gold will pay a higher ongoing cash price under the Base Silver Stream and Option Silver 
Stream for silver ounces delivered in excess of specific annual thresholds. 

RGLD Gold made its first advance payment of $65.8 million on November 5, 2019, its second advance payment of $22.0 
million on February 2, 2020, and its third advance payment of $47.9 million on April 3, 2020. On July 5, 2020, RGLD 
Gold made its fourth advance payment of $11.1 million, which brings the total contribution under the Base Silver Stream 
to $146.8 million. Further payments are subject to certain conditions and are scheduled to be made on a quarterly basis 
using an agreed formula and certification process as project spending progresses.   

Separate from the Base Silver Stream and Option Silver Stream, and subject to various conditions, RGLD Gold will make 
up to $25 million available to KCM toward the end of development of Khoemacau under a subordinated debt facility. Any 
amounts drawn by KCM under the debt facility will carry interest at LIBOR + 11% and have a term of seven years. RGLD 
Gold will have the right to force repayment of the debt facility upon certain events. 

We have accounted for the Silver Stream and Option Stream (if exercised by KCM) as an asset acquisition, consistent with 
the treatment of our other acquired streams. The $135.7 million in advance payments for the Base Silver Stream made 
during our fiscal year 2020, plus direct transaction costs, have been recorded as a development stage stream interest within 
Stream and royalty interests, net on our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2020.    Further advance payments made 
under the Silver Stream or Option Stream (if exercised by KCM) will be recorded as a development stage interest within 
Stream and royalty interests, net on our consolidated balance sheets during the period the advance payment occurs. 

53 

 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

4. STREAM AND ROYALTY INTERESTS, NET 

The following summarizes our stream and royalty interests as of June 30, 2020 and 2019: 

As of June 30, 2020 (Amounts in thousands): 
Production stage stream interests: 

Mount Milligan 
Pueblo Viejo 
Andacollo 
Rainy River 
Wassa 
Total production stage stream interests 

Production stage royalty interests: 

Voisey's Bay 
Peñasquito 
Holt 
Cortez 
Other 
Total production stage royalty interests 

Total production stage stream and royalty interests 

Development stage stream interests: 

Khoemacau 
Other 

Development stage royalty interests: 

Other 

Total development stage stream and royalty interests 

Exploration stage royalty interests: 

Pascua-Lama 
Other 

Total exploration stage royalty interests 
Total stream and royalty interests, net 

Cost 

Accumulated 
Depletion 

     Impairments      

Net 

  $ 

  790,635   $   (236,352)  $ 
  610,404  
  388,182  
  175,727  
  146,475  
    2,111,423  

  (203,935) 
  (110,521) 
  (27,278) 
  (67,619) 
  (645,705) 

  —   $   554,283 
  406,469 
  —  
  277,661 
  —  
  148,449 
  —  
  —  
  78,856 
    1,465,718 
  —  

  205,724  
  99,172  
  34,612  
  80,681  
  487,225  
  907,414  
    3,018,837  

  (101,381) 
  (44,614) 
  (23,851) 
  (15,065) 
  (403,080) 
  (587,991) 
    (1,233,696) 

  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  
  (1,341) 
  (1,341) 
  (1,341) 

  104,343 
  54,558 
  10,761 
  65,616 
  82,804 
  318,082 
    1,783,800 

  136,608  
  12,037  

  70,952  
  219,597  

  —  
  —  

  —  
  —  

  —  
  —  

  —  
  —  

  136,608 
  12,037 

  70,952 
  219,597 

  177,690  
  137,826  
  315,516  

  —  
  177,690 
  —  
  137,826 
  315,516 
  —  
  $   3,553,950   $  (1,233,696)  $    (1,341)  $  2,318,913 

  —  
  —  
  —  

54 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

As of June 30, 2019 (Amounts in thousands): 
Production stage stream interests: 

Mount Milligan 
Pueblo Viejo 
Andacollo 
Rainy River 
Wassa 
Total production stage stream interests 

Total production stage stream and royalty interests 
Production stage royalty interests: 

Voisey's Bay 
Peñasquito 
Holt 
Cortez 
Other 
Total production stage royalty interests 

Total production stage stream and royalty interests 
Development stage stream interests: 

Other 

Development stage royalty interests: 

Cortez 
Other 
Total development stage royalty interests 

Total development stage stream and royalty interests 

Exploration stage royalty interests: 

Pascua-Lama 
Other 

Total exploration stage royalty interests 
Total stream and royalty interests, net 

Mount Milligan 

Cost 

Accumulated 
Depletion 

Net 

  $   790,635   $ 
  610,404  
  388,182  
  175,727  
  146,475  
    2,111,423  

  (184,091)  $ 
  (158,819) 
  (86,675) 
  (14,522) 
  (56,919) 
  (501,026) 

  606,544 
  451,585 
  301,507 
  161,205 
  89,556 
  1,610,397 

  205,724  
  99,172  
  34,612  
  20,878  
  487,224  
  847,610  
  2,959,033  

  (95,564) 
  (40,659) 
  (22,570) 
  (12,362) 
  (386,501) 
  (557,656) 
    (1,058,682) 

  110,160 
  58,513 
  12,042 
  8,516 
  100,723 
  289,954 
  1,900,351 

  12,038  

  —  

  12,038 

  59,803  
  70,952  
  130,755  
  142,793  

  —  
  —  
  —  
  —  

  59,803 
  70,952 
  130,755 
  142,793 

  177,690  
  118,482  
  296,172  

  177,690 
  118,482 
  296,172 
  $  3,397,998   $   (1,058,682)  $    2,339,316 

  —  
  —  
  —  

RGLD Gold owns the right to purchase 35% of the payable gold and 18.75% of the payable copper produced from the 
Mount Milligan copper-gold mine in British Columbia, Canada, which is operated by an indirect subsidiary of Centerra 
Gold Inc. (“Centerra”). The Company’s carrying value for its stream interest at Mount Milligan is $554.3 million as of 
June 30, 2020.     

On October 30, 2019, Centerra reported that issues identified with decreasing long-term gold recoveries and increased 
costs  in  the  short-to medium-term  led  them  to record  an  impairment charge  against  their  carrying value of  the  Mount 
Milligan  mine  under  applicable  accounting  standards,  and  that  it  had  begun  a  comprehensive  technical  review  of  the 
operation with the objective of publishing an updated National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) technical report. 

On March 26, 2020, Centerra published an updated NI 43-101 technical report for Mount Milligan which provided, among 
other things, a detailed update to the life of mine plan and reductions to the proven and probable reserves due to increased 
costs, lower expected productivities and lower process plant throughput.   

Significant reductions in proven and probable reserves or mineralized material are indicators of potential impairment for 
Royal Gold’s stream and royalty interests. As part of our regular asset impairment analysis during the quarter ended March 

55 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

31, 2020, we determined that an impairment of our stream interest at Mount Milligan was not necessary as (i) the financial 
impairment  taken by  Centerra  does not  impact  the  mine operating  performance,  and (ii)  the  reduction  in  reserves and 
mineralized material at Mount Milligan resulted in updated gold and copper depletion rates that remain well below current 
and long-term consensus gold and copper prices. As of June 30, 2020, the gold and copper depletion rates at our Mount 
Milligan stream interest are $764 per ounce of gold and $1.48 per pound of copper. Depletion rates well below current and 
long-term consensus metal prices are a strong indicator the carrying value of our stream or royalty interests are recoverable. 

Rainy River   

RGLD  Gold  owns  the  right  to  purchase  6.50%  of  the  gold  produced  from  the  Rainy  River  mine,  which  is  located  in 
northwestern Ontario, Canada and is operated by New Gold, Inc. (“New Gold”), until 230,000 gold ounces have been 
delivered, and 3.25% thereafter; and 60% of the silver produced from the Rainy River mine until 3.1 million silver ounces 
have been delivered, and 30% thereafter. As of June 30, 2020, approximately 38,700 ounces of gold and approximately 
410,500 ounces of silver have been delivered to RGLD Gold. The Company’s carrying value for its stream interest at 
Rainy River is $148.5 million as of June 30, 2020. 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, New Gold reported that it continued to advance a comprehensive mine 
optimization study that would include a review of alternative open pit and underground mining scenarios at Rainy River 
On February 13, 2020, New Gold reported the results of the comprehensive optimization study that included an updated 
mine plan, which resulted in, among other things, a reduction in gold and silver reserves and the potential to extend the 
underground mine life beyond calendar 2028. New Gold published an updated NI 43-101 technical report for Rainy River 
on March 27, 2020, reflecting the updated mine plan and reserves. 

Significant reductions in proven and probable reserves or mineralized material are indicators of potential impairment for 
the  Company’s  stream  and  royalty  interests.  As  a  result  of  the  new  information  from  New  Gold,  and  as  part  of  the 
Company’s regular asset impairment analysis, the Company determined that an impairment on its Rainy River stream 
interest was not necessary as of March 31, 2020 as the reduction in gold and silver reserves resulted in updated depletion 
rates that remain well below current and long-term consensus gold and silver prices. As of June 30, 2020, the gold and 
silver  depletion  rates  at  our  Rainy  River  stream  interest  are  $848  per  ounce  of  gold  and  $11.27  per  ounce  of  silver. 
Depletion rates well below current and long-term metal prices are a strong indicator the carrying value of our stream or 
royalty interests are recoverable.   

COVID-19 and current economic environment 

Several  of  our  operating  counterparties  announced  temporary  operational  curtailments  or  the  withdrawal  or  review  of 
previously disclosed guidance due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The economic and societal impacts associated 
with COVID-19 are fluid and changing rapidly, and we are currently unable to predict the nature or extent of any impact 
on  our  results  of  operations  and  financial  condition.  We  will  continue  to  monitor  any  further  developments  that  the 
COVID-19 pandemic may have on stream or royalty interests as part of our regular asset impairment analysis. 

Impairment of royalty interests 

In  accordance  with  our  impairment  accounting  policy  discussed  in  Note 1,  impairments  in  the  carrying  value  of  each 
royalty  interests  are  measured  and  recorded  to  the  extent  that  the  carrying  value  in  each  royalty  interest  exceeds  its 
estimated fair value, which is generally calculated using estimated future discounted cash-flows. For our regular asset 
impairment analysis, we did not identify the presence of any impairment indicators and did not record any impairment 

56 

 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

charges for the fiscal year ended of June 30, 2019. We identified impairment indicators and recorded impairment charges 
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, and 2018 as summarized in the following table and discussed in detail below: 

Royalty: 

Pascua-Lama 
Other 

Total impairment of royalty interests 

Other 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  

2020 

2019 

2018 

(Amounts in thousands) 

  — 
  1,341 
  1,341 

$ 

$ 

  —  
  —  
  —  

$ 

  239,080 
  284 
  239,364 

During  the  quarter  ended  June  30,  2019,  we  were  made  aware  of  insolvency  proceedings  at  one  of  our  non-principal 
producing properties (El Toqui).    During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, we obtained new information regarding the 
insolvency proceedings and determined our carrying value for El Toqui was not recoverable and an impairment of $1.3 
million was necessary.    Our carrying value for El Toqui is zero as of June 30, 2020. 

Pascua-Lama 

We own a 0.78% to 5.45% sliding-scale NSR royalty on gold and silver production from the Chilean portion of the Pascua-
Lama project, which straddles the border between Argentina and Chile, and is owned by Barrick. We own an additional 
royalty equivalent to 1.09% of proceeds from copper produced from the Chilean portion of the project, net of allowable 
deductions, sold on or after January 1, 2017.   

On January 18, 2018, Barrick reported that it is analyzing a revised sanction related to the Pascua-Lama project issued by 
Chile’s  Superintendencia  del  Medio  Ambiente  (“SMA”)  on  January  17,  2018.  The  sanction  is  part  of  a  re-evaluation 
process ordered by Chile’s Environmental Court in 2014 and relates to historical compliance matters at the Pascua-Lama 
project. According to Barrick, the SMA has not revoked Pascua-Lama’s environmental permit, but has ordered the closure 
of existing facilities on the Chilean side of the project, in addition to certain monitoring activities.   

On  February  6,  2018,  in  light  of  the  SMA  order  to  close  surface  facilities  in  Chile,  and  earlier  plans  to  evaluate  an 
underground mine, Barrick announced it reclassified Pascua-Lama’s proven and probable reserves, which are based on an 
open pit mine plan, as mineralized material. Barrick reported further details in its year-end results on February 14, 2018 
and an update on the Pascua-Lama project at its February 22, 2018 Investor Day. A significant reduction in reserves or 
mineralized material are indicators of impairment.   

On April 23, 2018, Barrick announced that work performed to-date on the prefeasibility study for a potential underground 
project has  been suspended, and  they will  focus on  adjusting  the project  closure plan  for  surface  infrastructure  on  the 
Chilean side of the project. Barrick will continue to evaluate opportunities to de-risk the project while maintaining Pascua-
Lama as an option for development in the future if economics improve and related risks can be mitigated.   

As part of the impairment determination, the fair value for Pascua-Lama was estimated by calculating the net present value 
of the estimated future cash-flows, subject to our royalty interest, expected to be generated by the mining of the Pascua-
Lama deposits. We applied a probability factor to our fair value calculation that Barrick will either proceed with an open-
pit mine or an underground mine at Pascua. The estimates of future cash flows were derived from open-pit and underground 
mine models we developed using various information reported by Barrick. The metal price assumptions we used in the 
model were supported by consensus price estimates obtained by a number of industry analysts. The future cash flows were 
discounted using a discount rate which reflects specific market risk factors we associate with the Pascua-Lama royalty 

57 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

interest. Following the impairment charge ($239.1 million) during the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Pascua-
Lama  royalty  interest  has  a  remaining  carrying  value  of  $177.7  million  as  of  June  30,  2020.  As  a  result  of  Barrick’s 
reclassification of Pascua-Lama’s reserves to mineralized material, our Pascua-Lama royalty interest was reclassified to 
exploration stage from development stage during our fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.   

5. MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES 

As of June 30, 2020, our marketable equity securities include 809,744 common shares of Contango Ore, Inc., 3,949,575 
common shares of Battle North Gold Corporation (formerly Rubicon Minerals Corporation), and warrants to purchase up 
to  19,640,000  common  shares  of  TriStar.  Our  marketable  equity  securities  are  measured  at  fair  value  (Note  12)  each 
reporting period with any changes in fair value recognized in net income. 

The fair value of our marketable equity securities increased $1.4 million and decreased $6.8 million for the years ended 
June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and these changes are included in Fair value changes in equity securities on our 
consolidated  statements  of  operation  and  comprehensive  income  (loss).  The  carrying  value  of  our  marketable  equity 
securities as of June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019 was $17.9 million and $16.0 million, respectively, and is included in 
Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. 

6. DEBT 

The Company’s debt as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 consists of the following: 

As of June 30, 2020 
Debt 
Issuance 
Costs 
(Amounts in thousands) 

As of June 30, 2019 
Debt 
Issuance 
Costs 
(Amounts in thousands) 

     Principal      

Total   

     Principal      

Total   

Revolving credit facility 
Total debt 

Revolving Credit Facility 

  $    305,000  $    (4,561)  $  300,439   $   220,000  $    (5,446)  $  214,554
  $    305,000  $     (4,561)  $   300,439  $   220,000  $    (5,446)  $   214,554

On September 20, 2019, we entered into a third amendment to our revolving credit facility dated as of June 2, 2017. Under 
the amendment, our Swiss subsidiary RGLD Gold was added as a co-borrower and joint and several obligor, certain of the 
Company’s Canadian subsidiaries were added as guarantors, and certain equity pledges that previously had been granted 
in favor of the lenders to support the facility were released, with the result being the facility is now unsecured. 

As of June 30, 2020, we had $305 million outstanding and $695 million available under our revolving credit facility. As 
of June 30, 2020, the interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit facility was LIBOR plus 1.10% for an all-in 
rate of 1.29%. Interest expense recognized on the revolving credit facility for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 
and  2018  was  approximately  $7.0  million,  $1.7  million  and  $5.7  million,  respectively,  and  included  interest  on  the 
outstanding  borrowings  and  the  amortization  of  the  debt  issuance  costs.  We  were  in  compliance  with  each  financial 
covenant (leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio) under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2020. 

Royal Gold may repay any borrowings under the revolving credit facility at any time without premium or penalty. The 
Company’s revolving credit facility matures on June 3, 2024. 

58 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

7. REVENUE 

Revenue Recognition 

Under U.S. GAAP, a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct good or service (or 
integrated package of goods and/or services) to a customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct 
performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. In accordance with 
this guidance, revenue attributable to our stream interests and royalty interests is generally recognized at the point in time 
that control of the related metal production transfers to our customers. The amount of revenue we recognize further reflects 
the consideration to which we are entitled under the respective stream or royalty agreement. A more detailed summary of 
our revenue recognition policies for our stream and royalty interests is discussed below.   

Stream Interests 

A metal stream is a purchase agreement that provides, in exchange for an upfront deposit payment, the right to purchase 
all or a portion of one or more of the metals produced from a mine, at a price determined for the life of the transaction by 
the purchase agreement. Gold, silver and copper received under our metal streaming agreements are taken into inventory, 
and then sold primarily using average spot rate gold, silver and copper forward contracts. The sales price for these average 
spot rate forward contracts is determined by the average daily gold, silver or copper spot prices during the term of the 
contract, typically a consecutive number of trading days between ten days and three months (depending on the frequency 
of deliveries under the respective streaming agreement and our sales policy in effect at the time) commencing shortly after 
receipt and purchase of the metal. We settle our forward sales contracts via physical delivery of the metal to the purchaser 
(our  customer)  on  the  settlement  date  specified  in  the  contract.  Under  our  forward  sales  contracts,  there  is  a  single 
performance obligation to sell a contractually specified volume of metal to the purchaser, and we satisfy this obligation at 
the point in time of physical delivery. Accordingly, revenue from our metal sales is recognized on the date of settlement, 
which is the date that control, custody and title to the metal transfer to the purchaser. 

Royalty Interests 

Royalties are non-operating interests in mining projects that provide the right to a percentage of revenue or metals produced 
from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. We are entitled to payment for our royalty interest in a mining 
project based on a contractually specified commodity price (for example, a monthly or quarterly average spot price) for 
the  period  in  which  metal  production  occurred.  As  a  royalty  holder,  we  act  as  a  passive  entity  in  the  production  and 
operations of the mining project, and the third-party operator of the mining project is responsible for all mining activities, 
including  subsequent  marketing  and  delivery  of  all  metal  production  to  their  ultimate  customer.  In  all  of  our  material 
royalty interest arrangements, we have concluded that we transfer control of our interest in the metal production to the 
operator at the point at which production occurs, and thus, the operator is our customer. We have further determined that 
the  transfer  of  each  unit  of  metal  production,  comprising  our  royalty  interest,  to  the  operator  represents  a  separate 
performance  obligation  under  the  contract,  and  each  performance  obligation  is  satisfied  at  the  point  in  time  of  metal 
production by the operator. Accordingly, we recognize revenue attributable to our royalty interests in the period in which 
metal production occurs at the specified commodity price per the agreement, net of any contractually allowable offsite 
treatment, refining, transportation and, if applicable, mining costs. 

Royalty Revenue Estimates 

For a small number of our royalty interests, we may not receive, or be entitled to receive, payment information, including 
production  information  from  the  operator,  for  the  period  in  which  metal  production  occurred  prior  to  issuance  of  our 
financial statements. As a result, we may estimate revenue for these royalties based on available information, including 
public  information, from  the operator. If  adequate  information  is not  available  from  the  operator or  from other public 
sources  before  we  issue  our  financial  statements,  we  will  recognize  royalty  revenue  during  the  period  in  which  the 
necessary payment information is received. Differences between estimates and actual amounts could differ significantly 

59 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

and are recorded in the period that the actual amounts are known. Please also refer to our “Use of Estimates” accounting 
policy discussed in Note 2. For the quarter ended June 30, 2020, royalty revenue that was estimated or was attributable to 
metal production for a period prior to June 30, 2020, was not material.   

Disaggregation of Revenue 

We have identified two material revenue sources in our business: stream interests and royalty interests. These identified 
revenue sources are consistent with our reportable segments as discussed in Note 14.   

Revenue by metal type attributable to each of our revenue sources is disaggregated as follows (amounts in thousands): 

Stream revenue: 
          Gold 
          Silver 
          Copper 
                    Total stream revenue 
Royalty revenue: 
          Gold 
          Silver 
          Copper 
          Other 
                    Total royalty revenue 
Total revenue 

Year Ended   

June 30,  
2020 

June 30,  
2019 

  $ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  294,490 
  32,744 
  32,634 
  359,868 

  98,153 
  9,996 
  13,528 
  17,274 
  138,951 
  498,819 

  $ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  249,496 
  33,282 
  23,046 
  305,824 

  78,570 
  5,497 
  13,808 
  19,357 
  117,232 
  423,056 

Revenue by metal type attributable to each of our revenue sources is disaggregated as follows (amounts in thousands): 

Stream revenue: 
          Mount Milligan 
          Pueblo Viejo 
          Andacollo 
          Wassa   
          Other 
                    Total stream revenue 
Royalty revenue: 
          Peñasquito 
          Cortez 
          Other 
                    Total royalty revenue 
Total revenue 

  Metal(s) 

  Gold & Copper 
  Gold & Silver 
  Gold 
  Gold 
  Gold & Silver 

  Gold, Silver, Lead & Zinc 
  Gold 
  Various 

Year Ended   

June 30,  
2020 

June 30,  
2019 

  $ 

  131,425   $ 

  96,978  
  74,219  
  23,203  
  34,043  

  359,868   $ 

  25,498   $ 
  22,342  
  91,111  
  138,951   $ 
  498,819   $ 

  $ 

  $ 

  $ 
  $ 

  101,010 
  82,844 
  69,264 
  22,098 
  30,608 
  305,824 

  13,865 
  11,383 
  91,984 
  117,232 
  423,056 

Refer to Note 14 for the geographical distribution of our revenue by reportable segment. 

8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION 

In November 2015, our shareholders approved the 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2015 LTIP”). Under the 
2015 LTIP, 2,500,000 shares of common stock have been authorized for future grants to officers, directors, key employees 
and other persons. The 2015 LTIP provides for the grant of stock options, unrestricted stock, restricted stock, dividend 

60 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

equivalent rights, SSARs and cash awards. Any of these awards may, but need not, be made as performance incentives. 
Stock options granted under the 2015 LTIP may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options. 

We recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  

2020 

2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

Stock options 
Stock appreciation rights 
Restricted stock 
Performance stock 
Total stock-based compensation expense 

  $ 

  221   $

  163  $ 

  318 
  1,988 
  4,487 
  1,486 
  $    9,116  $    6,617   $   8,279 

  2,025  
  3,336  
  1,035  

  2,545 
  5,117 
  1,291 

Stock-based compensation expense is included within General and administrative expense on the consolidated statements 
of operations and comprehensive income (loss).   

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights 

Stock option and SSARs awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of our stock at the 
date of grant. Stock option and SSARs awards granted to officers, key employees and other persons vest based on one to 
three years of continuous service. Stock option and SSARs awards have 10 year contractual terms. 

To determine stock-based compensation expense for stock options and SSARs, the fair value of each stock option and 
SSAR is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model for all 
periods  presented.  The  Black-Scholes  model  requires  key  assumptions  in  order  to  determine  fair  value.  Those  key 
assumptions during the fiscal year 2020, 2019 and 2018 grants are noted in the following table: 

Weighted-average expected volatility 
Weighted-average expected life in years 
Weighted-average dividend yield 
Weighted-average risk free interest rate 

Stock Options 

SSARs 
2019   

  2020   
2018    
     34.4 %    36.5 %    42.2 %    34.6 %    37.6 %    42.4 %

2019        2018        2020   

4.5   

4.5   
1.0 %    1.1 %    1.1 %    1.0 %    1.1 %    1.1 %
1.6 %    2.7 %    1.8 %    1.6 %    2.7 %    1.8 %

5.5   

5.2   

4.7   

5.4  

Our expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over the expected option term. Our expected option 
term is determined by historical exercise patterns along with other known employee or company information at the time 
of  grant.  The  risk-free  interest  rate  is  based  on  the  zero-coupon  U.S.  Treasury  bond  at  the  time  of  grant  with  a  term 
approximate to the expected option term. 

61 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Stock Options 

A summary of stock option activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, is presented below. 

  Weighted-  

     Weighted-        
Average 

Outstanding at July 1, 2019 
Granted 
Exercised 
Forfeited 
Outstanding at June 30, 2020 
Exercisable at June 30, 2020 

Average    Remaining  
Exercise    Contractual   Intrinsic Value
(in thousands) 

  Life (Years)  

Aggregate 

Price 

  Number of  
Shares 
  42,298   $    70.65   
  1,604   $   124.60   
  (24,199)  $    72.92   
  (802)  $   124.60   
  18,901   $    70.38   
  15,623   $    65.96   

  6.0   $ 
  5.5   $ 

  1,020 
  912 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, 
was $17.42, $24.12 and $27.12, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended 
June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, were $1.3 million, $0.7 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. 

As  of  June 30, 2020,  there  was  approximately  $0.1 million  of  total  unrecognized  stock-based  compensation  expense 
related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. 

SSARs 

A summary of SSARs activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, is presented below. 

  Weighted-  

     Weighted-        
Average 

  Number of   

Shares 

Average    Remaining  
Exercise    Contractual   Intrinsic Value
(in thousands) 

  Life (Years)  

Aggregate 

Price 

Outstanding at July 1, 2019 
Granted 
Exercised 
Forfeited 
Outstanding at June 30, 2020 
Exercisable at June 30, 2020 

  175,599   $   79.20   
  53,616   $  124.15   
     (101,823)  $   81.02   
  (4,788)  $  124.60   
  122,604   $   95.57   
  42,386   $   73.48   

  7.8   $ 
  6.3   $ 

  3,536 
  2,155 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of SSARs granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 
was $32.33, $26.37 and $29.17, respectively. The total intrinsic value of SSARs exercised during the fiscal years ended 
June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, was $4.6 million, $2.8 million, and $6.4 million, respectively. 

As  of  June 30, 2020,  there  was  approximately  $1.5 million  of  total  unrecognized  stock-based  compensation  expense 
related to unvested SSARs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years. 

Other Stock-based Compensation 

Performance Shares 

During fiscal 2020, officers and certain employees were granted shares of restricted common stock that can only be earned 
upon the achievement of certain pre-defined performance measures. Specifically, for performance shares granted in fiscal 

62 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
       
   
  
       
   
  
       
   
  
       
   
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
       
   
  
       
   
       
   
  
       
   
  
  
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

2020, one-half of the shares awarded may vest upon our achievement of annual growth in Net Gold Equivalent Ounces 
(“Net GEOs”) (“GEO Shares”). The second one-half of performance shares granted in fiscal 2020 may vest based on our 
total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to the TSRs of other members of the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) 
(“TSR Shares”). GEO Shares and TSR Shares may vest by linear interpolation in a range between zero shares if neither 
threshold Net GEO and TSR metric is met; to 100% of GEO Shares and TSR Shares awarded if both target Net GEO and 
TSR metrics are met; to 200% of the Net GEO and TSR shares awarded if both the maximum Net GEO and TSR metrics 
are met. The GEO Shares will expire in five years from the date of grant if the performance measure is not met, while the 
TSR Shares will expire in three years from the date of grant if the TSR market condition and three year service condition 
are not met. 

We measure the fair value of the GEO Shares based upon the market price of our common stock as of the date of grant. 
The measurement date for the GEO Shares will be determined at such time that the performance goals are attained or that 
it  is  probable  they  will  be  attained.  At  such  time  that  it  is  probable  that  a  performance  condition  will  be  achieved, 
compensation expense will be measured by the number of shares that will ultimately be earned based on the grant date 
market price of our common stock. For shares that were previously estimated to be probable of vesting and are no longer 
deemed to be probable of vesting, compensation expense is reversed during the period in which it is determined they are 
no longer probable of vesting. Interim recognition of compensation expense will be made at such time as management can 
reasonably estimate the number of shares that will be earned. 

We measured the grant date fair value using a Monte Carlo valuation model. The fair value of the TSR Shares ($77.50 per 
share)  is  multiplied by  the  target  number (100%) of  TSR  Shares granted  to determine  total  stock-based  compensation 
expense. Total stock-based compensation expense of the TSR Shares is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite 
service period, or three years. Stock-based compensation expense for the TSR Shares is recognized provided the requisite 
service period is rendered, regardless of when, if ever, the TSR market condition is satisfied. We will reverse previously 
recognized stock-based compensation expense attributable to the TSR Shares only if the requisite service period is not 
met. 

A summary of the status of our unvested Performance Shares at maximum (200%) attainment for the fiscal year ended 
June 30, 2020, is presented below: 

Outstanding at July 1, 2019 
Granted 
Vested 
Forfeited 
Non-attainment 
Outstanding at June 30, 2020 

     Weighted- 
Average 

Shares 

  Number of   Grant Date 
  Fair Value 
     155,022   $    68.35 
  32,840   $   100.48 
  (15,753)  $    53.65 
  (15,525)  $    98.15 
  (11,672)  $    52.79 
     144,912   $    80.59 

As  of  June 30, 2020,  total  unrecognized  stock-based  compensation  expense  related  to  Performance  Shares  was 
approximately $1.5 million, which is expected to be recognized over the average remaining vesting period of 2.2 years. 

Restricted Stock 

Officers, non-executive directors and certain employees may be granted shares of restricted stock that vest on continued 
service  alone  (“Restricted  Stock”).  During  fiscal  2020,  officers  and  certain  employees  were  granted  17,710  shares  of 
Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock granted to officers and certain employees vest over three years beginning after a two-
year holding period from the date of grant with one-third of the shares vesting in years three, four and five, respectively. 

63 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Also, our non-executive directors were granted 8,316 shares of Restricted Stock during fiscal year 2020. The non-executive 
directors’ shares of Restricted Stock vest 50% immediately and 50% one year after the date of grant. 

We measure the fair value of the Restricted Stock based upon the market price of our common stock as of the date of grant. 
Restricted  Stock  is  amortized  over  the  applicable  vesting  period  using  the  straight-line  method.  Unvested  shares  of 
Restricted Stock are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment or service. 

A summary of the status of our unvested Restricted Stock for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, is presented below: 

Outstanding at July 1, 2019 
Granted 
Vested 
Forfeited 
Outstanding at June 30, 2020 

     Weighted- 
Average 

Shares 

  Number of   Grant Date 
  Fair Value 
     142,969   $    77.13 
  26,026   $   123.72 
  (63,054)  $    92.90 
  (9,894)  $   121.12 
  96,047   $    90.40 

As of June 30, 2020, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to Restricted Stock was approximately 
$3.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting period of 3.1 years. 

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”) 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share were computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock 
outstanding  during  the  period,  considering  the  effect  of  participating  securities.  Unvested  stock-based  compensation 
awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities and 
are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Our unvested restricted stock 
awards contain non-forfeitable dividend rights and participate equally with common stock with respect to dividends issued 
or declared. Our unexercised stock options, unexercised SSARs and unvested performance stock do not contain rights to 
dividends. Under the two-class method, the earnings (loss) used to determine basic earnings (loss) per common share are 
reduced by an amount allocated to participating securities. Use of the two-class method has an immaterial impact on the 
calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share. 

The following table summarizes the effects of dilutive securities on diluted EPS for the period (amounts in thousands, 
except share data): 

Net income (loss) attributable to Royal Gold common 
stockholders 
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS 
Effect of other dilutive securities 
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS 
Basic earnings (loss) per share 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share 

June 30,  
2020 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
June 30,  
2019 

June 30,  
2018 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  199,343 
  65,523,024 
  120,366 
  65,643,390 
  3.04 
  3.03 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  93,825   
  65,394,627   
  110,908   
  65,505,535   
  1.43   
  1.43   

$ 

$ 
$ 

  (113,134)
  65,291,855 
  — 
  65,291,855 
  (1.73)
  (1.73)

64 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

10. INCOME TAXES 

For financial reporting purposes, Income (loss) before income taxes includes the following components: 

2020 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

United States 
Foreign 

Our Income tax (benefit) expense consisted of: 

    $    35,446     $    (3,776)    $    (39,662)
  (64,917)
    110,353  
  $   192,596   $   106,577   $   (104,579)

    157,150  

2020 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

Current: 
Federal 
State 
Foreign 

Deferred and others: 
Federal 
State 
Foreign 

Total income tax (benefit) expense 

  $    18,320   $    (6,974)  $    24,621 
  253 
     22,741 
  $    28,745   $   19,243   $    47,615 

  347  
     10,078  

  (13) 
     26,230  

  $    (1,047)  $ 

  (19) 
     (31,333) 

  916   $    (2,253)
  (223)
     (30,367)
  $   (32,399)  $    (1,745)  $   (32,843)
  $    (3,654)  $   17,498   $    14,772 

  17  
     (2,678) 

The provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, differs from the amount of income 
tax  determined  by  applying  the  applicable  United  States  statutory  federal  income  tax  rate  to  pre-tax  income  (net  of 
non-controlling interest in income of consolidated subsidiary and loss from equity investment) from operations as a result 
of the following differences: 

2020 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  
2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

Total expense (benefit) computed by applying federal rates 
State and provincial income taxes, net of federal benefit 
Excess depletion 
Estimates for uncertain tax positions 
Statutory tax attributable to non-controlling interest 
Effect of foreign earnings 
Effect of foreign earnings indefinitely reinvested 
Realized foreign exchange gains 
Unrealized foreign exchange gains 
Effects of US income tax reform 
Effects of Swiss income tax reform 
Changes in estimates 
Valuation allowance 
Other 

Total income tax (benefit) expense 

65 

    $    40,445     $   22,381     $   (29,343)
  (104)
  (1,440)
  8,574 
  1,736 
  1,230 
     (19,004)
     18,330 
  (1,610)
     30,675 
  — 
  (70)
  6,337 
  (539)
  $    (3,654)  $   17,498   $    14,772 

  304  
  (1,291) 
     (11,146) 
  654  
  (8,249) 
  —  
  —  
  (286) 
  —  
    (72,669) 
  24  
  47,840  
  720  

  135  
  (867) 
  3,180  
  1,013  
     (6,921) 
  —  
  —  
  (38) 
  —  
  —  
     (1,538) 
  (47) 
  200  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
        
        
   
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
    
  
    
  
   
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

The  current  year  effective  tax  rate  includes  the  impact  of  the  Federal  Act  on  Tax  Reform  and  AHV  Financing  in 
Switzerland and the release of an uncertain tax position resulting from a settlement agreement with a foreign tax authority. 

The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards, which give rise to our deferred tax assets and liabilities at 
June 30, 2020 and 2019, are as follows: 

Deferred tax assets: 
Stock-based compensation 
Net operating losses 
Foreign tax credits 
Amortizable tax goodwill 
Other 
Total deferred tax assets 
Valuation allowance 
Net deferred tax assets 
Deferred tax liabilities: 
Mineral property basis 
Unrealized foreign exchange gains 
Investment in Peak Gold joint venture 
Other 
Total deferred tax liabilities 
Total net deferred taxes 

2019 
2020 
(Amounts in thousands) 

  $ 

  1,313    $ 
  104   
  17,159   
  67,287   
  7,713   
  93,576   
     (60,604)  

  $ 

  32,972    $ 

  1,118 
  56 
  11,125 
  — 
  7,960 
  20,259 
  (12,764)
  7,495 

  $    (67,639)   $    (74,360)
  (582)
  (4,353)
  (150)
  (79,445)
  $    (39,550)   $    (71,950)

  (582)  
  (3,955)  
  (346)  
     (72,522)  

We review the measurement of our deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date. Considering all available positive and 
negative evidence, including but not limited to recent earnings history and forecasted future results, the Company believes 
it is more likely-than-not that all net deferred tax assets not currently burdened with a valuation allowance will be fully 
realized.    As  of  June 30, 2020,  and  2019,  we  recorded  a  valuation  allowance  of  $60.6  million  and  $12.8 million, 
respectively.  The  valuation  allowance  remaining  at  June  30,  2020  is  attributable  to  US  foreign  tax  credits,  Swiss 
amortizable tax goodwill, capital loss and other tax attribute carryforwards in non-US subsidiaries. 

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, we had $0.4 million and $0.2 million of net operating loss carry forwards, respectively. The 
majority of the tax loss carry forwards are in jurisdictions that allow a twenty-year carry forward period. As a result, these 
losses do not begin to expire until the 2038 tax year, and the Company anticipates the losses will be fully utilized. 

As  of  June 30, 2020,  and  2019,  we  had  $25.4  million  and  $36.5 million  of  unrecognized  tax  benefits,  respectively.  If 
recognized, these unrecognized tax benefits would positively impact our effective income tax rate. A reconciliation of the 
beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 

2020 

2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

Total gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year 
Additions / Reductions for tax positions of current year 
Additions / Reductions for tax positions of prior years 
Reductions due to settlements with taxing authorities 
Total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year 

     $    36,547      $   36,346       $   28,542 
  1,624 
  6,180 
  — 
  $    25,389   $   36,547    $   36,346 

  537  
  (694) 
     (11,001) 

  1,709   
  (912) 
  (596) 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, 
the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local, and non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities 
for  fiscal years  before  2014.  As  a  result  of  possible  settlements  with  taxing  authorities  in  various  jurisdictions,  the 

66 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
          
   
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
     
  
   
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its net unrecognized income tax benefits may 
decrease by $24 million in the next 12 months. 

Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of our income 
tax  expense.  At  June 30, 2020  and  2019,  the  amount  of  accrued  income-tax-related  interest  and  penalties  was 
$12.6 million.  The  gross  unrecognized  tax  benefits  reflected  in  the  tabular  reconciliation  do  not  include  interest  and 
penalties and are not reduced by advanced deposits of $12.6 million made to taxing authorities. 

11. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION 

Our supplemental cash flow information for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is as follows: 

Cash paid (received) during the period for: 

Interest 
Income taxes, net of refunds 

Non-cash investing and financing activities: 

Dividends declared 

12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

2020 

2019 
(Amounts in thousands) 

2018 

  4,900   $   10,638   $   16,049 
  $ 
  $    31,555   $   44,435   $   (3,058)

  $    72,463   $   68,473   $   64,814 

Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in 
an orderly  transaction  between market participants. As  such,  fair value  is  a market-based measurement  that  should be 
determined  based  on  assumptions  that  market  participants  would  use  in  pricing  an  asset  or  liability.  As  a  basis  for 
considering such assumptions, we utilize a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring 
fair value as follows: 

Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; 

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments 
in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value 
drivers are observable in active markets; and 

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement 
and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). 

The following table sets forth our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level 
within the fair value hierarchy. 

Assets (amounts in thousands): 

Marketable equity securities(1) 

 $ 

  17,863 

 $   17,863   $  13,858   $   4,005   $    — 

    Carrying Amount     

Total 

      Level 1 

     Level 2      Level 3 

As of June 30, 2020 

Fair Value 

(1) 

Included in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. 

Our marketable equity securities classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using quoted market prices 
in active markets multiplied by the quantity of shares held. The carrying value of our revolving credit facility (Note 6) 
approximates fair value as of June 30, 2020. The warrants issued by TriStar (Note 5) classified within Level 2 of the fair 

67 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
         
         
   
 
  
   
  
   
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

value  hierarchy  are  model-derived  (Black-Scholes)  valuations  in  which  the  significant  inputs  are  observable  in  active 
markets. 

As  of  June 30, 2020,  we  had  assets  that,  under  certain  conditions,  are  subject  to  measurement  at  fair  value  on  a 
non-recurring basis like those associated with stream and royalty interests, intangible assets and other long-lived assets. 
For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition is applicable if any of these 
assets  are  determined  to  be  impaired.  If  recognition  of  these  assets  at  their  fair  value  becomes  necessary,  such 
measurements will be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 4 for discussion of inputs used to develop fair 
value  for  those  stream  and  royalty  interests  that  were  determined  to  be  impaired  during  the  fiscal  years  ended 
June 30, 2020. 

13. MAJOR SOURCES OF REVENUE 

Operators that contributed greater than 10% of our total revenue for any of fiscal years 2020, 2019 or 2018 were as follows 
(revenue amounts in thousands): 

  Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020  
Percentage of   
total 
revenue 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019  
Percentage of   
total 
revenue 

Revenue 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018   
Percentage of    
total 
revenue 

Revenue 

Operator 
Centerra 
Barrick 
Teck 

Revenue 
    $   131,425      
     125,458   
  74,219   

  26.3 %   $   101,011      
  25.2 %     
  14.9 %     

  99,283   
  69,264   

  23.9 %   $   133,534      
  23.5 %        108,285   
  57,413   
  16.4 %     

  29.1 %
  23.6 %
  12.5 %

14. SEGMENT INFORMATION 

We manage our business under two reportable segments, consisting of the acquisition and management of stream interests 
and the acquisition and management of royalty interests. Royal Gold’s long-lived assets (stream and royalty interests, net) 
as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 are geographically distributed as shown in the following table (amounts in thousands):   

As of June 30, 2020 

As of June 30, 2019 

Canada 
Dominican Republic 
Chile 
Africa 
Mexico 
United States 
Australia 
Rest of world 
Total   

  $ 

interests, net    

Stream 
interest 

  Royalty 
interest 

  Royalty 
interest 

  Total stream   
  and royalty 

  Total stream 
  and royalty 
Stream 
interests, net 
interest 
  702,732   $  189,855   $   892,587   $   767,749   $   200,251   $   968,000 
  451,585 
  406,469    
  —    
  515,733 
  277,661       223,922    
  89,877 
  321    
  215,463    
  83,748 
  —    
  75,951    
  163,398 
  —       159,445    
  31,944 
  30,006    
  —    
  35,031 
  25,050    
  12,038    
  $   1,614,363   $  704,550   $  2,318,913   $  1,622,435   $   716,881   $  2,339,316 

  451,585    
  —    
  301,507       214,226    
  321    
  89,556    
  —    
  83,748    
  —       163,398    
  31,944    
  —    
  22,993    
  12,038    

  406,469    
  501,583    
  215,784    
  75,951    
  159,445    
  30,006    
  37,088    

Our reportable segments for purposes of assessing performance are shown below (amounts in thousands): 

Stream interests 
Royalty interests 
Total 

Year Ended June 30, 2020 
Production 
taxes 

      Cost of sales        

      Revenue 
  $    359,868   $ 
  138,951  
  $    498,819   $ 

  83,890   $ 
  —  
  83,890   $ 

      Depletion         

Segment 
gross profit 
  —   $    144,678  $    131,300 
  104,758 
  30,369 
  3,824 
  3,824  $    175,047  $    236,058 

68 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Stream interests 
Royalty interests 
Total   

Stream interests 
Royalty interests 
Total   

Year Ended June 30, 2019 
Production 
taxes 

      Cost of sales       

      Revenue 
  $    305,824   $ 
  117,232  
  $    423,056   $ 

  77,535   $ 
  —  
  77,535   $ 

      Depletion 

Segment 
gross profit 
  —   $    127,770  $    100,519 
  4,112 
  78,034 
  35,086 
  4,112  $    162,856  $    178,553 

Year Ended June 30, 2018 
Production 
taxes 

      Cost of sales       

      Revenue 
  $    324,516   $ 
  134,526  
  $    459,042   $ 

  83,839   $ 
  —  
  83,839   $ 

      Depletion 

Segment 
gross profit 
  —   $    129,662  $    111,015 
  2,268 
  98,334 
  33,924 
  2,268  $    163,586  $    209,349 

A  reconciliation  of  total  segment  gross  profit  to  the  consolidated  Income  (loss)  before  income  taxes  is  shown  below 
(amounts in thousands): 

Total segment gross profit 

Costs and expenses 

General and administrative expenses 
Exploration costs 
Depreciation 
Impairment of royalty interests 

Operating income (loss) 

Fair value changes in equity securities 
Interest and other income 
Interest and other expense 

Income (loss) before income taxes 

Year Ended June 30,  

2020 
  236,058  

$ 

2019 
  178,553  

$ 

2018 
  209,349 

$ 

  30,195 
  5,190 
  387 
  1,341 
  198,945  
  1,418  
  2,046  
  (9,813) 
  192,596  

$ 

  30,488 
  7,158 
  200 
  —  
  140,707  
  (6,800) 
  2,320  
  (29,650) 
  106,577  

  35,464
  8,946
  110
  239,364
  (74,535)
  — 
  4,170 
  (34,214)
  (104,579)

$ 

$ 

69 

 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

Our revenue by reportable segment for the fiscal year’s ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is geographically distributed 
as shown in the following table (amounts in thousands): 

Stream interests: 

Canada 
Dominican Republic 
Chile 
Africa 

Total stream interests 

Royalty interests: 
United States 
Canada 
Mexico 
Australia 
Africa 
Chile 
Rest of world 

Total royalty interests 
Total revenue 

2020 

2019 

2018 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,  

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  158,736 
  96,978 
  74,219 
  29,935 
  359,868 

  48,692 
  30,524 
  32,731 
  15,252 
  2,575 
  —  
  9,177 
  138,951 
  498,819 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

123,152 
82,844 
69,264 
30,564 
  305,824 

34,845 
32,602 
27,224 
12,806 
1,416 
  —  
8,339 
  117,232 
  423,056 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

  142,244
  95,055
  57,413
  29,804
  324,516

  39,496
  24,254
  42,959
  13,710
  2,098
  473
  11,536
  134,526
  459,042

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

Khoemacau Silver Stream Acquisition 

Pursuant to its Khoemacau silver stream transaction in February 2019, RGLD Gold made its first advance payment of 
$65.8  million  on  November  5,  2019,  its  second  advance  payment  of  $22.0  million  on  February  2,  2020,  and  its  third 
advance payment of $47.9 million on April 3, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, our conditional funding schedule for $76.3 
million up to $129.3 million pursuant to our Khoemacau silver stream acquisition remains subject to certain conditions. 
On July 5, 2020, RGLD Gold made its fourth advance payment of $11.1 million. 

Ilovica Gold Stream Acquisition 

As of June 30, 2020, our conditional funding schedule of $163.75 million, as part of the Ilovica gold stream acquisition in 
October 2014, remains subject to certain conditions. 

70 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ROYAL GOLD, INC. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) 

16. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) 

The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial information (unaudited). Some amounts in the below table may 
not sum-up in total as a result of rounding. 

Net income    
attributable to 

Revenue 

Operating   
income 
(Amounts in thousands except per share data) 

Royal Gold    Basic earnings   Diluted earnings 
stockholders   

per share 

per share 

Fiscal year 2020 quarter-ended: 

September 30,  
December 31,  
March 31,  
June 30,  

Fiscal year 2019 quarter-ended: 

September 30,  
December 31,  
March 31,  
June 30,  

  1.07 
  0.63 
  0.59 
  0.75 
  3.03 

  0.23 
  0.36 
  0.44 
  0.40 
  1.43 

  $   118,774   $    48,781   $ 

    123,643  
    136,437  
    119,965  

  53,307  
  52,281  
  44,576  
  $   498,819   $   198,945   $    199,343   $ 

  70,453   $ 
  41,321  
  38,554  
  49,015  

  1.07   $ 
  0.63  
  0.59  
  0.75  
  3.04   $ 

(Amounts in thousands except per share data) 

  $    99,992   $    25,333   $ 

  97,592  
    109,778  
    115,694  

  31,449  
  43,201  
  40,724  

  $   423,056   $   140,707   $ 

  15,008   $ 
  23,586  
  28,772  
  26,459  
  93,825   $ 

  0.23   $ 
  0.36  
  0.44  
  0.40  
  1.43   $ 

71 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
        
        
        
        
   
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
ITEM 9.      CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND 
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

None. 

ITEM 9A.      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

(a)          Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief 
Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as 
of June 30, 2020. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that 
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2020, at the reasonable assurance level. 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our 
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 
reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted 
accounting principles. 

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020. In making this 
assessment,  management  used  the  criteria  set  forth  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway 
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on management’s assessment 
and those criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 
2020. 

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report on our internal 
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

There  were  no  changes  in  our  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  during  our  fourth  fiscal  quarter  ended 
June 30, 2020,  that  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  our  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting.   

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls 

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure 
controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well 
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are 
met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of 
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation 
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Royal Gold have 
been detected. 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Royal Gold, Inc. 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting   

We  have  audited  Royal  Gold,  Inc.’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  June  30,  2020,  based  on  criteria 
established  in  Internal  Control—Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the 

72 

 
 
 
Treadway  Commission  (2013  framework)  (the  COSO  criteria).  In  our  opinion,  Royal  Gold,  Inc.  (the  Company) 
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020, based on the 
COSO criteria.   

We  also  have  audited,  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United 
States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated 
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in 
the period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes and our report dated August 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion 
thereon.   

Basis for Opinion 

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its 
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s 
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal 
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are 
required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in  accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the 
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform 
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained 
in all material respects.     

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material 
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed 
risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit 
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with 
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies 
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the 
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded 
as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, 
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management 
and  directors  of  the  company;  and  (3)  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  prevention  or  timely  detection  of 
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial 
statements.   

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.   

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
Denver, Colorado   
August 6, 2020 

ITEM 9B.       OTHER INFORMATION 

None. 

73 

 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
PART III 

ITEM 10.       DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting 
to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2020, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K.   

ITEM 11.       EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting 
to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2020, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K. 

ITEM 12.       SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND 
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting 
to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2020, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K. 

ITEM 13.       CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR 
INDEPENDENCE 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting 
to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2020, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K. 

ITEM 14.       PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting 
to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2020, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K. 

PART IV 

ITEM 15.       EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 

(a)     Financial Statements 

Index to Financial Statements 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

74 

Page 

41
43
44
45
46
47

 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
(b)     Exhibits 

Exhibit 
Number 

Description 

3.1 

3.2 

3.3 

3.4 

4.1 

10.1▲ 

10.2▲ 

  Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report

on Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference) 

  Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended on August 28, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Royal Gold’s 

Current Report on Form 8-K on September 4, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference)  

  Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of
Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on September 10, 
2007, and incorporated herein by reference) 

  Certificate  of  Designations,  Preferences  and  Rights  of  the  Special  Voting  Preferred  Stock  of  Royal
Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February 23, 2010, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

  Description of capital stock (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on 

November 7, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

  2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current 

Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference) 

  2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Royal Gold’s Registration

Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 20, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.3▲ 

  Royal Gold Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Royal
Gold’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 20, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.4▲ 

  Form of Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and William Heissenbuttel, dated
January 2, 2020 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-
K/A filed on January 3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference). 

10.5▲ 

  Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold Corporation and Mark Isto effective January 2,
2020 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A on 
January 3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference). 

10.6▲ 

  Employment Contract effective January 1, 2019, by and between RGLD Gold AG and Daniel Breeze
(filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  Royal  Gold’s  Current  Report  on  Form 8-K  filed  on  January  7,  2019,  and
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.7▲ 

  Form of Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and each of Paul Libner and Randy 
Shefman (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A on 
January 3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference). 

75 

 
 
 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 
Number 

10.8▲ 

  Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement entered into between Royal Gold, Inc. or
certain subsidiaries and the directors and executive officers thereof (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s 
Current Report on Form 8-K on September 4, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference)  

Description 

10.9▲ 

  Retirement Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Tony Jensen, dated January 1, 2020 (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on January 
3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.10▲ 

  Retirement Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Bruce Kirchhoff, dated January 1, 2020
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal Gold’s Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A on January 
3, 2020, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.11▲ 

  Form of  Employment  Agreement  by  and  between  Royal  Gold, Inc.  and  Tony  Jensen  (filed  as
Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2016, and incorporated herein
by reference) 

10.12▲ 

  Form of  Employment  Agreement  by  and  between  Royal  Gold, Inc.  and  Bruce  Kirchhoff  (filed  as
Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2016, and incorporated herein
by reference) 

10.13▲ 

  Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and each of 
Tony Jensen and Bruce Kirchhoff (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 
filed on February 8, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.14▲ 

  Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan in the 
form entered into by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Daniel Breeze (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal 
Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 2, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.15▲ 

  Performance  Share  Agreement  under  Royal  Gold’s  2015  Omnibus  Long-Term  Incentive  Plan  in  the 
form entered into by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Daniel Breeze (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal 
Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 2, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.16▲ 

  Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan in 
the form entered into by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Daniel Breeze (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal 
Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 2, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.17▲ 

  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.18▲ 

  Form of  Restricted  Stock  Agreement  under  Royal  Gold’s  2015  Omnibus  Long-Term  Incentive  Plan 
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.19▲ 

  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan 
(filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

76 

 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 
Number 

10.20▲ 

Description 
  Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.21▲ 

  Form of  Director  Restricted  Stock  Unit  Agreement  under  Royal  Gold’s  2015  Omnibus  Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 
1, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.22▲ 

  Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.23▲ 

  Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 1, 2018, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.24▲ 

  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan 
(filed  as  Exhibit  10.58  to  Royal  Gold’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  on  August  10,  2017,  and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.25▲ 

  Form  of  Director  Restricted  Stock  Unit  Agreement  under  Royal  Gold’s  2015  Omnibus  Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on August 10, 2017, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.26▲ 

  Form of  Amendment  to  Equity  Award  Agreements  under  Royal  Gold's  2004  Omnibus  Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 
2016, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.27▲ 

  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.57 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on August 10, 2016, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.28▲ 

  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Royal Gold 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed 
as Exhibit 10.58 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on August 10, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference) 

10.29▲ 

  Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on August 10, 2016, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.30▲ 

  Form of Performance Share Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan 
(filed  as  Exhibit  10.60  to  Royal  Gold’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  on  August  10,  2016,  and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

10.31▲ 

  Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.61 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on August 10, 2016, and 
incorporated herein by reference) 

77 

 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 
Number 

10.32▲ 

Description 
  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (Officer) under Royal Gold’s 2004 Omnibus Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 
2013, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.33▲ 

  Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Officer) under Royal Gold’s 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive 
Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2013, 
and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.34▲ 

  Form of  Performance  Share  Agreement  (Officer)  under  Royal  Gold’s  2004  Omnibus  Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 
2013, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.35▲ 

  Form of  Stock  Appreciation  Rights  Agreement—Stock  Settled  (Officer)  under  Royal  Gold’s  2004
Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K 
filed on September 3, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference)  

10.36 

  Royalty Agreement between Royal Gold, Inc. and the Cortez Joint Venture dated April 1, 1999 (filed as 
part of Item 5 of Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 12, 1999, and incorporated herein
by reference) 

10.37 

  Firm offer to purchase royalty interest of “Idaho Group” between Royal Gold, Inc. and Idaho Group 
dated  July 22,  1999  (filed  as  Attachment  A  to  Royal  Gold’s  Current  Report  on  Form 8-K  on 
September 2, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.38 

  Royalty  Deed  and  Agreement,  dated  effective  as  of  April 15,  1991,  between  ECM, Inc.  and  Royal 
Crescent Valley, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(1) to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended June 30, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.39 

  Form of Agreement for Assignment of Partnership Interest in Crescent Valley Partners, L.P. (filed as 
Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on January 8, 2014, and incorporated herein
by reference) 

10.40 

10.41 

  Purchase and Sale Agreement for Peñasquito and Other Royalties among Minera Kennecott S.A. DE 
C.V.,  Kennecott  Exploration  Company  and  Royal  Gold, Inc.,  dated  December 28,  2006  (filed  as 
Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007, and incorporated 
herein by reference) 

  Contract  for  Assignment  of  Rights  Granted,  by  Minera  Kennecott, S.A.  de  C.V.  Represented  in  this
Agreement  by  Mr. Dave  F.  Simpson,  and  Minera  Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V.,  Represented  in  this 
Agreement by Attorney, Jose Maria Gallardo Tamayo (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.42† 

  Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Royal Gold, Inc., RGLD Gold AG, 
Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc., and Terrane Metals Corp. dated as of December 14, 2011 (filed 
as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 15, 2011, and incorporated 
herein by reference) 

78 

 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 
Number 

10.43† 

10.44 

10.45 

  First  Amendment  to  Amended  and  Restated  Purchase  and  Sale  Agreement  by  and  among  Royal
Gold, Inc., RGLD Gold AG, Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc., and Terrane Metals Corp. dated
as of August 8, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K on August 9, 
2012, and incorporated herein by reference) 

Description 

  Second  Amendment  to  Amended  and  Restated  Purchase  and  Sale  Agreement  by  and  among  Royal
Gold, Inc., RGLD Gold AG, Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc., and Terrane Metals Corp. dated
as  of  December 11,  2014  (filed  as  Exhibit 10.1  to  Royal  Gold’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q  on 
January 29, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference). 

  Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 20, 2016,
among RGLD Gold AG, Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc., and Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on November 3, 2016, and incorporated herein by
reference) 

  Long Term Offtake Agreement, dated July 9, 2015, between Compania Minera Teck Carmen de 

10.46 

Andacollo and RGLD Gold AG (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 
filed on November 5, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference) 

10.47 

  Precious Metals Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 5, 2015, among RGLD Gold AG, BGC 
Holdings Ltd., and Barrick Gold Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report 
on Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference)   

10.48 

10.49 

10.50 

10.51 

  Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 20, 2016, among The Bank of Nova Scotia for the Senior Debt
Secured Parties identified therein, RGLD Gold AG and Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on November 3, 2016, and incorporated
herein by reference) 

  Revolving Facility Credit Agreement, dated June 2, 2017, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG Mexico, Inc.,
the  lenders  from  time  to  time  party  thereto,  and  HSBC  Bank  USA,  National  Association,  as
administrative agent for the lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K 
on June 6, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference) 

  Revolving Facility Credit Agreement Amendment, dated May 15, 2018, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG
Royalties, LLC (f/k/a RG Mexico, Inc.), Royal Gold International Holdings, Inc., the lenders from time 
to  time  party  thereto,  and  the  Bank  of  Nova  Scotia,  as  administrative  agent  for  the  lenders  (filed  as 
Exhibit 10.38 to Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on August 9, 2018, and incorporated
herein by reference) 

  Second Amendment to Revolving Facility Credit Agreement dated June 3, 2019, among Royal Gold,
Inc., RG Royalties, LLC (f/k/a RG Mexico, Inc.), Royal Gold International Holdings, Inc. RGLD UK
Holdings  Limited,  the  lenders  from  time  to  time  party  thereto,  and  the  Bank  of  Nova  Scotia,  as
administrative agent for the lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K 
on June 6, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

79 

 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 
Number 

10.52 

Description 

  Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Facility Credit Agreement dated as of September 20, 2019, and entered
into by and among Royal Gold, Inc., RGLD Gold AG, RG Royalties, LLC, Royal Gold International
Holdings, Inc., the banks and financial institutions identified therein as a “Lender,” and The Bank of
Nova Scotia as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference) 

21.1* 

  Royal Gold and Its Subsidiaries 

23.1* 

  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

31.1* 

  Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 

Act of 2002 

31.2* 

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

32.1* 

32.2* 

  Written  Statement  of  the  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  pursuant  to  Section 906  of  the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

  Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002 

101.INS*    Inline XBRL Instance Document 

101.SCH*   Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 

101.CAL*   Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 

101.DEF*   Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 

101.LAB*   Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 

101.PRE*   Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document 

104 

  Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) 

* 

Filed or furnished herewith. 

▲ 

Identifies a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement. 

†  Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted by redacting a portion of the text (indicated by asterisks in the text). This exhibit 
has been filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. 

ITEM 16.       FORM 10-K SUMMARY 

The optional summary in Item 16 has not been included in this Form 10-K. 

80 

 
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused 
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

SIGNATURES 

Date: August 6, 2020 

ROYAL GOLD, INC. 

By:  /s/ WILLIAM H. HEISSENBUTTEL 
  William H. Heissenbuttel 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following 
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

Date: August 6, 2020 

By: /s/ WILLIAM H. HEISSENBUTTEL 
  William H. Heissenbuttel 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

Date: August 6, 2020 

By: /s/ PAUL K. LIBNER 

Paul K. Libner 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

Date: August 6, 2020 

Date: August 6, 2020 

Date: August 6, 2020 

By: /s/ WILLIAM M. HAYES 
  William M. Hayes 

Chairman 

By: /s/ C. KEVIN MCARTHUR 

C. Kevin McArthur 
Director 

By: /s/ JAMIE C. SOKALSKY 

Jamie C. Sokalsky 
Director 

Date: August 6, 2020 

By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER M.T. THOMPSON 

Date: August 6, 2020 

Date: August 6, 2020 

Chris M.T. Thompson 
Director 

By: /s/ RONALD J. VANCE 

Ronald J. Vance 
Director 

By: /s/ SYBIL E. VEENMAN 

Sybil E. Veenman 
Director 

81 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(This page intentionally left blank.) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Royal Gold, Inc. and its Subsidiaries 
As of June 30, 2020 

Name 
Royal Gold, Inc. 

Denver Mining Finance Company, Inc. 

Crescent Valley Partners, L.P. 

Royal Crescent Valley, LLC 

   RG Royalties, LLC 

RGLD Holdings, LLC 

RGLD Gold (Canada) ULC 

International Royalty Corporation 

4324421 Canada Inc. 

           Labrador Nickel Royalty Limited Partnership 

Royal Alaska, LLC 
 Peak Gold, LLC 

Royal Gold International Holdings, Inc. 
   RGLD UK Holdings Limited 

     RGLD Gold AG 
     Royal Gold Corporation 

EXHIBIT 21.1 

State / Province /  
Country of 
Incorporation 
Delaware 
Colorado 
Colorado 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Alberta 
Canada 
Canada 
Ontario 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
United 
Kingdom 
   Switzerland   
Canada 

Ownership 
Percentage 

100 % 
93.077 % 
100 % 
100 % 
100 % 
 * 
100 % 
100 % 
90 % 
100 % 
40 % 
100 % 

100 % 
100 % 
100 % 

* 

Royal Gold, Inc. owns approximately 22% and RGLD Holdings, LLC owns approximately 77% of RGLD Gold 
(Canada) ULC 

 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

1)  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-224626) of Royal Gold, Inc.,  
2)  Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-111590) of Royal Gold, Inc., 
3)  Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-145213) of Royal Gold, Inc.,  
4)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-219378) of Royal Gold, Inc., and  
5)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-209391) of Royal Gold, Inc. 

of our reports dated August 6, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Royal Gold, Inc., and the 
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Royal Gold, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended June 30, 2020. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Denver, Colorado 
August 6, 2020 

 
 
EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, William H. Heissenbuttel, certify that: 

CERTIFICATION 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Royal Gold, Inc.; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a 
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements 
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report fairly 
present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as 
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over 
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have: 

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

(d) 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures 
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, 
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly 
during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial 
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this 
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end 
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the 
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the 
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

(5) 

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal 
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of 
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) 

(b) 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over 
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, 
process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a 
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

August 6, 2020 

/s/ WILLIAM H. HEISSENBUTTEL 
William H. Heissenbuttel 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Paul K. Libner, certify that: 

CERTIFICATION 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Royal Gold, Inc.; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a 
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements 
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly 
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as 
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over 
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have: 

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

(d) 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures 
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, 
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly 
during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial 
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this 
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end 
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the 
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the 
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

(5) 

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal 
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of 
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) 

(b) 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over 
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, 
process, summarize and report financial information; and 

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a 
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

August 6, 2020 

/s/ PAUL K. LIBNER 
Paul K. Libner 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

EXHIBIT 32.1 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Royal Gold, Inc. (the “Company”), for the year ended 

June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Heissenbuttel, 
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant 
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge: 

(1) 

(2) 

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934; and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition 
and results of operations of the Company. 

August 6, 2020 

/s/ WILLIAM H. HEISSENBUTTEL 
William H. Heissenbuttel 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

EXHIBIT 32.2 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Royal Gold, Inc. (the “Company”), for the year ended 
June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul K. Libner, Chief Financial 
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge: 

(1) 

(2) 

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934; and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition 
and results of operations of the Company. 

August 6, 2020 

/s/ PAUL K. LIBNER 
Paul K. Libner 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

 
 
 
 
 
APPENDIX A

OVERVIEW OF NON-GAAP 
FINANCIAL MEASURES

Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard 
meaning prescribed by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These measures should not be 
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because the 
presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures varies among companies, these non-GAAP financial measures 
may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. 

We have provided below reconciliations of our non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP measures. 
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors for analysis of our business. 
We use these non-GAAP financial measures to compare period-over-period performance on a consistent basis 
and when planning and forecasting for future periods. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are used 
by professional research analysts and others in the valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of 
companies in our industry. Many investors use the published research reports of these professional research 
analysts and others in making investment decisions. The adjustments made to calculate our non-GAAP financial 
measures are subjective and involve significant management judgement. Non-GAAP financial measures used by 
management in this report or elsewhere include the following: 

1.  Net debt (cash) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated by the Company as debt (excluding debt 
issuance costs) at the end of a period minus cash and equivalents for that same date. Cash and equivalents 
are subtracted from the GAAP measure because it could be used to reduce our debt obligations. A limitation 
associated with using net debt is that it subtracts cash and equivalents and therefore may imply that there is less 
Company debt than the most comparable GAAP measure indicates. We believe that investors may find these 
measures useful to monitor leverage and evaluate the balance sheet. 

2.  Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated by the Company as net cash provided by operating 
activities for a period minus acquisition of stream and royalty interests for that same period. We believe that free 
cash flow represents an additional way of viewing liquidity as it is adjusted for contractual investments made during 
such period. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures. We 
believe it is important to view free cash flow as a complement to our consolidated statements of cash flows.

A-1

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL 
MEASURES TO U.S. GAAP MEASURES

NET DEBT (CASH):

(amounts in thousands)

Debt

Debt issuance costs

Cash and equivalents

Net debt (cash)

FREE CASH FLOW:

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2019

$ 300,439

$ 214,554

4,561

5,446

(319,128)

(119,475)

$ (14,128)

$ 100,526

(amounts in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

Acquisition of stream and royalty interests

Free cash flow

Three Months Ended 
June 30,

Years Ended 
June 30,

2020

2019

2020

2019

$ 91,557

$72,257

$ 340,752

$ 253,166

(48,130)

—

(155,985)

(1,055)

$ 43,427

$72,257

$ 184,767

$ 252,111

OTHER MEASURES
We use certain other measures in managing and evaluating our business. We believe these measures may provide 
useful information to investors for analysis of our business. We use these measures to compare period-over-
period performance and liquidity on a consistent basis and when planning and forecasting for future periods. We 
believe these measures are used by professional research analysts and others in the valuation, comparison, and 
investment recommendations of companies in our industry. Many investors use the published research reports 
of these professional research analysts and others in making investment decisions. Other measures used by 
management in this report and elsewhere include the following:

1.  Gold equivalent ounces, or GEOs, is calculated by the Company as revenue (in total or by reportable segment) 

for a period divided by the average gold price for that same period.

A-2

             (This page intentionally left blank.)              (This page intentionally left blank.) 1144 15TH STREET, SUITE 2500 DENVER COLORADO 80202WWW.ROYALGOLD.COM