Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / Scandium International Mining Corp.

Scandium International Mining Corp.

scy · TSX Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker scy
Exchange TSX
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2020 Annual Report · Scandium International Mining Corp.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES  
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 
ACT OF 1934 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________ 

000-54416 
(Commission File Number) 

Scandium International Mining Corp. 
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) 

British Columbia, Canada 
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation 
or organization) 

98-1009717 
(I.R.S. Employer  
Identification No.) 

1430 Greg Street, Suite 501 
Sparks, Nevada 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 

89431 
(Zip Code) 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code:  (775) 355-9500  

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None 

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: 

 Common Shares without par value 

(Title of class) 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the 
Securities Act.   Yes [  ]  No [X] 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 
15(d) of the Act.   Yes [  ]  No [X] 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period 
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements 
for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]  No [  ] 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  every  Interactive  Data  File 
required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the 
preceding  12  months  (or  for  such  shorter  period  that  the  registrant  was  required  to  submit  such  files).     
Yes [X]   No [  ] 

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-
accelerated  filer,  a  smaller  reporting  company  or  an  emerging  growth  company.   See  the  definitions  of 
“large  accelerated  filer,”  “accelerated  filer”  “smaller  reporting  company”  and  “emerging  growth 
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one): 

Large Accelerated Filer             
Non-Accelerated Filer             

  Accelerated Filer                   
Smaller Reporting Company 
Emerging Growth Company  

If  an  emerging  growth  company,  indicate  by  check  mark  if  the  registrant  has  elected  not  to  use  the 
extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided 
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  [   ] 

Indicate by check  mark  whether the registrant has filed a report  on and attestation to its  management’s 
assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued 
its audit report.  [   ] 

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  shell  company  (as  defined  in  Rule  12b-2  of  the 
Exchange Act).  Yes [  ]   No [X] 

State  the  aggregate  market  value  of  the  voting  and  non-voting  common  equity  held  by  non-affiliates 
computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked 
price  of  such  common  equity,  as  of  the  last  business  day  of  the  registrant’s  most  recently  completed 
second fiscal quarter: $14,493,219 as at June 30, 2020.  

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the 
latest practicable date: 316,172,595 common shares as at February 25, 2021. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by 
reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, which Proxy Statement is to be filed within 120 days after the 
end of the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Note about Forward-Looking Statements ..................................................................................................... 4 

Glossary of Terms ......................................................................................................................................... 4 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS .................................................................................................................................... 8 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS ...................................................................................................................... 12 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................................. 14 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................................................... 33 

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES ............................................................................................... 33 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER 

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES .................................................... 33 

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA .............................................................................................. 35 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................... 35 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ........ 42 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ............................................ 42 

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND 

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ..................................................................................................................... 42 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ........................................................................................ 42 

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 43 

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES ...................................................... 44 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note about Forward-Looking Statements 

PART I 

Certain  statements  contained  in  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  and  the  documents  incorporated  by 
reference herein constitute "forward-looking statements.”  Forward-looking statements may include, but 
are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of commodities, the estimation of mineral 
resources,  the  realization  of  mineral  resource  estimates,  the  timing  and  amount  of  estimated  future 
production,  costs  of  production,  capital  expenditures,  costs  and  timing  of  the  development  of  new 
deposits,  success  of  exploration  activities,  our  ability  to  fund  property  acquisition  costs,  our  ability  to 
reach  targeted  time  frames  for  establishing  feasibility,  permitting  time  lines,  currency  fluctuations, 
requirements  for  additional  capital,  government  regulation  of  mining  operations,  environmental  risks, 
unanticipated  reclamation  expenses,  title  disputes  or  claims,  our  ability  to  raise  funds  necessary  for 
ongoing  and planned  expenditures  and operations,  and  regulatory  approvals.    In  certain  cases,  forward-
looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans,” "expects" or "does not expect,” 
"is expected,” "scheduled,” "estimates,” "intends, "anticipates" or "believes,” or variations of such words 
and  phrases  or  state  that  certain  actions,  events  or  results  "may,”  "could,”  "would"  or  "will  be  taken,” 
"occur" or "be achieved.”  Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties 
and  other  factors  which  may  cause  our  actual  results,  performance  or  achievements  to  be  materially 
different  from  any  future  results,  performance  or  achievements  expressed  or  implied  by  the  forward-
looking statements. Such factors may include, among others, risks related to our joint venture operations; 
actual  results  of  current  exploration  activities  or  production  technologies  that  we  are  currently  testing; 
actual results of reclamation activities; future metal  prices; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of 
the  mining  industry;  delays  in  obtaining  governmental  or  regulatory  approvals  or  financing  or  in  the 
completion  of  development  activities,  as  well  as  those  factors  discussed  in  the  section  entitled  "Risk 
Factors" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that 
could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward looking 
statements,  there  may  be  other  factors  that  cause  actions,  events  or  results  not  to  be  as  anticipated, 
estimated  or  intended.  There  can  be  no  assurance  that  forward-looking  statements  will  prove  to  be 
accurate,  as  actual  results  and  future  events  could  differ  materially  from  those  anticipated  in  such 
statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  

Glossary of Terms 

“Company,”  “SCY,”  “we,”  “us,”  “our”  and  similar  words  of  similar  meaning  refer  to  Scandium 
International Mining Corp. 

$, A$, C$ 

mean respectively, United States dollars, Australian dollars and Canadian dollars. 

Alteration  

Usually referring to chemical reactions in a rock mass resulting from the passage of 
hydrothermal fluids. 

Assay  

An  analysis  to  determine  the  presence,  absence  or  quantity  of  one  or  more 
components, elements or minerals. 

. 

4 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core 

The long cylindrical piece of a rock, up to several inches in diameter, brought to the 
surface by Diamond drilling. 

Diamond drilling  A  drilling  method  in  which  the  cutting  is  done  by  abrasion  using  diamonds 
embedded in a matrix rather than by percussion. The drill cuts a core of rock, which 
is recovered in long cylindrical sections.  

Fractures  

Breaks in a rock, usually due to intensive folding or faulting. 

Grade 

The concentration of a valuable mineral within an Ore. 

Hydrothermal  

Hot fluids, usually water, which may or may not carry metals and other compounds 
in solution to the site of mineral deposition or wall rock alteration. 

Igneous  

A rock formed by the cooling of molten silicate material. 

Intrusion  

A general term for a body of igneous rock formed below the surface of the earth. 

Kg 

Km 

Kilogram which is equivalent to approximately 2.20 pounds. 

Kilometer which is equivalent to approximately 0.62 miles. 

Mineralization  

A term used to describe the presence of minerals of possible economic value. Also 
used to describe the process by which concentration of economic minerals occurs. 

Net Smelter 
Returns Royalty 

NI 43-101 

A share of the net revenues generated from the sale of metal produced by a mine. 

National Instrument 43-101 – Standards for Disclosure of Mineral  Projects,  being 
the  regulation  adopted  by  Canadian  securities  regulators  that  governs  the  public 
disclosure of technical and scientific information concerning a mineral property. 

Ore  

A naturally occurring solid material from which a metal or valuable mineral can be 
profitably extracted. 

Outcrop  

An exposure of rock at the earth’s surface. 

ppm 

Pyrite  

Parts per million. 

Iron sulphide mineral. The most common and abundant sulphide mineral and often 
found in association with copper and gold. 

Qualified Person  Means  a  Qualified  Person  as  defined  in  National  Instrument  43-101,  including  an 
engineer or geoscientist in good standing with their professional association, with at 
least five years of relevant experience. 

Quartz  

The second most common rock forming mineral in the earth’s crust. SiO2. 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Resource 

Means any of a measured, indicated or inferred resource as used in NI 43-101, and 
having the following meanings: 

“measured resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade 
or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that 
they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application 
of  technical  and  economic  parameters,  to  support  production  planning  and 
evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed 
and  reliable  exploration,  sampling  and  testing  information  gathered  through 
appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and 
drill  holes  that  are  spaced  closely  enough  to  confirm  both  geological  and  grade 
continuity. 

 “indicated resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade 
or  quality,  densities,  shape  and  physical  characteristics,  can  be  estimated  with  a 
level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and 
economic  parameters,  to  support  mine  planning  and  evaluation  of  the  economic 
viability  of  the  deposit.  The  estimate  is  based  on  detailed  and  reliable  exploration 
and  testing  information  gathered  through  appropriate  techniques  from  locations 
such  as  outcrops,  trenches,  pits,  workings  and  drill  holes  that  are  spaced  closely 
enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. 

“inferred resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade 
or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling 
and  reasonably  assumed,  but  not  verified,  geological  and  grade  continuity.  The 
estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate 
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. 

 For  the  purposes  of  the  above  a  “mineral  resource”  means  a  concentration  or 
occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized 
organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in 
or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that 
it  has  reasonable  prospects  for  economic  extraction.  The  location,  quantity,  grade, 
geological  characteristics  and  continuity  of  a  Mineral  Resource  are  known, 
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. 

(Please refer to “Item 2. Properties - Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Regarding 
Resource Estimates” in regards to the use of the above terms in this Form 10-K.) 

Sulphide  

A  class  of  minerals  characterized  by  the  linkage  of  sulphur  with  a  metal  (such  as 
Pyrite (FeS2)). 

Tpd/Tpa 

Tonnes per day/tonnes per annum. 

Tonne 

A metric ton which is equivalent to approximately 2,204 pounds.   

Sediments  

The  debris  resulting  from  the  weathering  and  breakup  of  rocks  that  have  been 
deposited  by  or  carried  by  runoff,  streams  and  rivers,  or  left  over  from  glacial 
erosion or sometimes from wind action. 

6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vein  

A geological feature  comprised  of  minerals (usually dominated by quartz) that  are 
found filling openings in rocks created by faults or replacing rocks on either side of 
faults or fractures. 

7 

 
 
 
 
ITEM 1.  BUSINESS 

General 

We  were  incorporated  on  July  17,  2006  under  the  laws  of  British  Columbia,  Canada  under  the  name 
Golden Predator Mines Inc. We were incorporated as a wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Metals Corp. 
for  the  purpose  of  holding  precious  metals  and  certain  specialty  metals  assets.    In  order  to  focus  on 
specialty  metals,  during  February  2009  we  transferred  most  of  our  precious  mineral  assets  to  our  then 
wholly-owned  subsidiary  Golden  Predator  Corp.,  and  on  March  6,  2009  we  completed  a  spin-out  of 
Golden  Predator  Corp.  to  our  shareholders.  Effective  March  12,  2009,  we  changed  our  name  to  EMC 
Metals  Corp. In order to reflect a new emphasis on mining  for scandium  minerals, effective November 
19, 2014, we changed our name to Scandium International Mining Corp (“SCY” or the “Company”). 

We  are  a  reporting  issuer  in  the  Canadian  Provinces  of  British  Columbia,  Alberta  and  Ontario  and  our 
common shares are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “SCY.”  

Our  head  office  is  located  at  1430  Greg  Street,  Suite  501,  Sparks,  Nevada  89431.  The  address  of  our 
registered office is 1200 - 750 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2T8.      

Our  primary  development  project  is  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project,  located  in  New  South  Wales, 
Australia  (the  “Nyngan  Scandium  Project”),  on  which  we  hold  a  mine  lease  grant  and  a  development 
consent.  We  also  hold  an  exploration  license  on  a  scandium  mineral  property  located  nearby  Nyngan 
known  as  the  “Honeybugle  Scandium  property”  and  a  reservation  on  an  exploration  license  on  a 
scandium mineral property in Finland, known as the “Kiviniemi Scandium property.” In addition to these 
scandium mining project interests, the Company is pursuing copper industry interest in our ion exchange 
(IX)  technology  and  knowhow  to  recover  scandium,  nickel,  cobalt  and  other  technology-driven  metals 
from mineral processing solutions, and other acidic waste streams in certain acid leach copper operations. 
This project effort is known as the “Critical Metals Recovery (CMR) Project,” with a specific focus on 
North American opportunities. 

Our plan of operation for the remainder of 2021 is to obtain copper industry partners for our ion exchange 
(IX) technology, and to subsequently secure offtake sales agreements with counterparties for those critical 
metals  planned  to  be  produced  at  participating  separation  sites.  The  Company  continues  to  pursue 
scandium  product  customers  for  offtakes,  either  from  critical  metals  projects  or  from  the  Nyngan 
Scandium  Project  product.  We  will  seek  additional  funding  for  corporate  working  capital  in  2021,  and 
also for advanced development of an approved CMR Project, once that project is identified.   

Intercorporate Relationships 

The chart below illustrates our corporate structure on December 31, 2020, including our subsidiaries, the 
jurisdictions of incorporation, and the percentage of voting securities held. 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to a share exchange agreement dated June 30, 2017, the Company acquired the remaining 20% 
interest in EMC Metals Australia Pty. Ltd. from Scandium Investments LLC (“SIL”). On completion of 
the share exchange, the Company issued an aggregate of 58,830,645 common shares to SIL and granted 
to SIL the right to nominate two individuals to the board of the Company for so long as SIL holds at least 
15% of SCY’s issued and outstanding shares, and one director for so long as SIL holds at least 5% but 
less than 15% of SCY’s issued and outstanding shares.   

Business Operations 

Company Summary 

We are a mineral exploration and development company that is primarily focused on the development of 
scandium  mineral  resources,  and  scandium  end-use  markets,  through  identification  of  value-added 
applications  for  scandium  in  aluminum  alloys  and  end  products.  The  Company  has  also  considered 
exploration  and  project  development  opportunities  in  rare  earth  minerals,  and  other  specialty  metals, 
specifically  including  nickel,  cobalt,  boron,  manganese,  tantalum,  titanium,  zirconium  and  high-purity 
alumina (HPA). We have not commenced construction on of any of our scandium projects, and as a result 
we are an exploration stage company.   

9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our principal project is the Nyngan Scandium Project located in New South Wales, Australia, in which 
we own 100% of the mineral rights. The Company is in possession of both a development consent and a 
mining  lease  grant  on  the  property  that  corresponds  to  a  definitive  feasibility  study  on  the  Nyngan 
Scandium  Project  dated  May  4,  2016  (the  “Feasibility  Study”  or  “DFS”),  which  was  prepared 
independently  in  accordance  with  NI  43-101.  The  results  of  the  DFS  include  a  16.9  million  tonne 
measured and indicated resource (grading 235ppm at a 100ppm cut-off) and a 1.43 million tonne mineral 
reserve  (combined  proven  and  probable),  based  on  economics  established  in  that  study.  The  DFS  was 
filed  on  May  6,  2016  and  is  available  on  SEDAR  (www.sedar.com),  on  the  Company’s  website 
(www.scandiummining.com)  and  on  the  SEC’s  website  (www.sec.gov).    A  summary  of  the  DFS  is 
provided herein under “Item 2. Properties – Description of Mineral Projects – Nyngan Scandium Project 
– Nyngan Feasibility Study.”  

The Company also holds exploration licenses on two separate scandium-prospective properties: 

• 

• 

an  exploration  license  on  the  Honeybugle  Scandium  property,  located  24  kilometers  from  the 
Nyngan Scandium Project, granted in 2014; and   
an  exploration  license  on the  Kiviniemi  Scandium  Property  a  scandium-prospective  property  in 
central Finland, granted in 2018.    

In  addition,  the  Company  is  currently  pursuing  copper  industry  interest  in  our  ion  exchange  (IX) 
technology  and  knowhow  to  recover  various  critical  metals  (usually  including  scandium)  from  mineral 
processing  solutions and other acidic waste streams present in acid leach copper operations. This  effort 
has a principal focus on opportunities in North America. 

Corporate Objectives and Strategy 

Our corporate focus is in the development of projects that enable the production and sale of scandium and 
scandium-based products. That scandium focus has now been expanded to include other specialty metals, 
identified by the US Department of Commerce in 2018 on a list of 35 critical metals, which specifically 
includes  scandium.  In  this  regard,  the  Company  is  pursuing  various  host  project  opportunities  that  can 
produce  a  basket  of  metal  products,  including  scandium,  along  with  other  technology-driven  critical 
metals.   

The Nyngan Scandium Project remains the most advanced project in the Company portfolio at this time, 
with  permitting  largely  complete  and  a  published  DFS  on  SEDAR.  Subject  to  successful  construction 
financing  and  customer  sales  agreements,  we  intend  to  develop  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  for 
production  and  supply  of  scandium  oxide  and  scandium-content  products.  The  Company  has  been 
successful  in  developing  capability  to  manufacture  an  aluminum-scandium  master  alloy  product, 
specifically  for  sale  to  aluminum  alloy  customers.  This  additional  product  capability  enhances  the 
Company’s  ability  to  sell  scandium-containing  products  to  the  aluminum  industry,  and  potentially 
generate additional margins in certain markets. For further information on the Nyngan Scandium Project, 
please  refer to “Item 2.  Properties - Description of Mineral Projects – Nyngan Scandium Project”  and 
“Item 1A. Risk Factors.”   

The  Company  is  independently  pursuing  opportunities  to  deploy  both  ion  exchange  (IX)  and  solvent 
extraction (SX) separation technologies and knowhow to recover critical metals from mineral processing 
solutions  and  acidic  waste  streams,  commonly  found  in  copper  leaching  operations.  The  critical  metals 
present  are  dependent  on the  specific  operation,  and  value  depends  on  concentration,  but  cobalt,  nickel 
and  scandium  represent  key  targets  for  recovery.  This  strategy  depends  on  SCY’s  ability  to  identify 
suitable mine operations with acceptable economics and to establish hosting arrangements with existing 
mine  operators  that  will  support  attractive  project  returns.  For  further  information  on  our  ion  exchange 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
technology,  please  refer  to  “Item  2.  Properties  -  Description  of  Mineral  Projects  –  Critical  Metals 
Recovery Technology Program” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”   

Global Scandium Production and Market  

Scandium is the 31st most abundant element in the earth’s crust (average 33 ppm), which makes it more 
common  than  lead,  mercury,  and  precious  metals,  but  less  common  than  copper.  Scandium  has 
characteristics that are similar to rare earth elements, and it is often classified as a member of that group, 
although it is technically a light transition metal. Scandium occurs in nature as an oxide, rarely occurs in 
concentrated quantities because it does not selectively combine with the common ore-forming anions, and 
is  very  difficult  to  reduce  to  a  pure  metal  state.    Scandium  is  typically  produced  and  sold  as  scandium 
oxide (Sc2O3), more properly known as scandia. 

Global annual production estimates of scandium range from 15 tonnes to 20 tonnes, but accurate statistics 
are  not  available  due  to  the  lack  of  public  information  from  countries  in  which  scandium  is  currently 
being produced. There are five known, primary production sources globally today:  stockpiles from the 
former Zhovti Voty uranium mine in Ukraine, the rare earth mine at Bayan Obo in China, apatite mines 
on the Kola Peninsula in Russia, by-product production from titanium dioxide (TiO2) pigment refiners in 
China, and recent start-up production of scandium oxide concentrates from the Taganito Nickel Mine in 
the Philippines (Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.). Recent announcements from Rio Tinto indicate their 
Quebec titanium feedstock producer, Rio Tinto Fer et Titane (RTFT), is planning to initiate small scale 
scandium production in 2021, with expansion capability planned for the future. 

There is no reliable pricing data on global scandium oxide trading. The U.S. Geological Survey (“USGS”) 
in its latest available report (dated January 2021) documents the 2020 price of scandium oxide (99.99% 
grade)  at  US$3,800/kg,  indicating  a  reduction  from  the  2019  price  estimate  of  US$3,900/kg.  Small 
quantities of scandium oxide, suitable for laboratory investigations, are currently offered on the internet 
by traders for prices at this level. Larger quantities of oxide product at varying purities are available  at 
considerably  lower  prices,  typically  below  US$2,000/kg.  Scandium  oxide  grades  of  95%  or  greater  are 
considered  commercially  suitable,  with  99.9%  grade  used  for  electrical  applications,  and  grades  higher 
than 99.9% reserved for science and new technical applications.  Scandium oxide grades of 95-99% are 
generally considered suitable for aluminum alloy applications.   

Scandium  oxide  is  typically  traded  in  small  quantities,  between  private  parties,  and  pricing  is  not 
transparent to other buyers or sellers as there is no clearing facility as is more common with commercially 
traded  metals  and  commodities.  Prices  do  vary,  based  on  purity  and  quantity  supplied.  Small  sale 
quantities  tend  to  command  premium  prices,  and  large  quantities  (over  one  tonne)  are  simply  not 
available to establish appropriate commercial pricing. 

Scandium  can  also  be  effectively  purchased  in  the  form  of  aluminum-scandium  (Al-Sc)  master  alloy, 
typically  containing  2%  scandium  by  weight.  This  product  is  the  preferred  form  for  manufacture  of 
aluminum alloys containing scandium. The latest available 2021 USGS report indicates the 2020 price for 
Al-Sc  2%  master  alloy  at  US$340/kg,  somewhat  higher  than  the  2019  USGS  average.  Recent  USGS 
estimated  prices  for  Al-Sc  2%  master  alloy  have  also  been  high  relative  to  commonly  available  prices, 
which have trended under US$100/kg and are available in one tonne lots or greater today.  

Principal  uses  for  scandium  are  in  high-strength  aluminum  alloys,  high-intensity  metal  halide  lamps, 
electronics, and laser research. Recently developed applications include welding wire and fuel cells which 
are expected to be in future demand. Approximately 15 different commercial aluminum-scandium alloys 
have  been  developed,  and  some  of  them  are  used  for  aerospace  applications.  In  Europe  and  the  U.S., 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
scandium-containing  alloys  have  been  evaluated  for  use  in  structural  parts  in  commercial airplanes  and 
high stress parts in automobile engines and brake systems. Military and aerospace applications are known 
to  be  of  interest,  although  with  less  specificity.  The  combination  of  high  strength,  weldability  and 
ductility  makes  aluminum-scandium  alloys  potentially  attractive  replacements  for  existing  aluminum 
alloys in a number of applications where improved alloy properties can add value to final products. 

Competitive Conditions  

We  compete  with  numerous  other  companies  and  individuals  in  the  search  for  and  the  acquisition  or 
control  of  attractive  rare  earth  and  specialty  metals  mineral  properties.  Our  ability  to  acquire  further 
properties will depend not only on our ability to operate and develop our properties but also on our ability 
to select and acquire suitable properties or prospects for development or mineral exploration.   

In regard to our plan to produce scandium, there are a limited number of scandium producers presently. If 
we are successful at becoming a producer of scandium, our ability to be competitive will require that we 
establish  a  reliable  supply  of  scandium  to  the  market,  delivered  at  purity  levels  demanded  by  various 
applications,  and  that  our  operating  costs  generate  margins  at  prices  that  will  be  set  by  customers  and 
competitors in a market yet to mature.   

Governmental Regulations and Environmental Laws 

The  development  of  any  of  our  properties,  and  specifically  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project,  will  require 
numerous  local  and  national  government  approvals  and  environmental  permits.  For  further  information 
about governmental approvals and permitting requirements, please refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.  

Employees 

As at January 1, 2021, we have 5 full and part time employees and 2 individuals working on a consulting 
basis. Our operations are managed by our officers with input from our directors. We engage geological, 
metallurgical,  and  engineering  consultants  from  time  to  time  as  required  to  assist  in  evaluating  our 
property interests and recommending and conducting work programs.  

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS 

In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the following are certain material risks 
and uncertainties that are specific to our industry and properties that could materially adversely affect our 
business, financial condition and results of operations.   

Risks Associated with the Nyngan Scandium Project  

There are technical challenges to scandium production that may render the Nyngan Scandium Project 
not economic.  The  economics  of  scandium recovery are known to be challenging. There  are very  few 
facilities  producing  scandium  and  the  existing  scandium  producers  are  secretive  in  their  techniques  for 
recovery. In addition, the recovery of scandium product from laterite resources, such as are found on the 
Nyngan  property,  has  not  been  demonstrated  at  an  operating  facility.  The  Nyngan  processing  facility 
design,  if  constructed,  will  be  the  first  of  its  kind  for  scandium  production.  These  factors  increase  the 
possibility that we will encounter unknown or unanticipated production and processing risks. Should we 
encounter any of these risks, they could increase the cost of production thereby reducing margins on the 
Nyngan Scandium Project or rendering it uneconomic.  

12 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
There  is  no  guarantee  that  we  will  be  able  to  finance  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  for  production.  
Any  decision  to  proceed  with  production  on  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  will  require  significant 
production financing. Scandium projects are uncommon, and economic and production uncertainty may 
limit  our  ability  to  attract  the  required  amount  of  capital  to  put  the  project  into  production.  If  we  are 
unable to source production financing on commercially viable terms, we may not be able to proceed with 
the project and may have to write off our investment in the project.  

We may not be successful in attracting copper industry interest in our ion exchange (IX) technology. 
Our technology is designed to recover scandium, cobalt and other critical metals from solvent extraction 
(SX)  raffinate  and  other  acidic  waste  streams  in  certain  acid  leach  copper  operations.  Access  to  these 
processing  streams  is  dependent  on  obtaining  contractual  relationships  with  existing  copper  mine 
operations. If we are unable to locate any existing copper mine operations willing to initiate access rights, 
then we may not be able to proceed with a CMR Project. 

If  we  are  successful  at  achieving  scandium  production,  we  may  have  difficulty  selling  scandium-
containing products.  Scandium is characterized by unreliable supply, resulting in limited development of 
markets for scandium oxide. Markets may take longer to develop than anticipated, and Nyngan and other 
potential scandium producers may have to wait for products and applications to create adequate demand. 
Certain applications may require lengthy certification processes that could delay usage or acceptance. In 
addition, certain scandium applications require very high purity scandium product, which is much more 
difficult  to  produce  than  lower  grade  product.  If  we  commence  production,  our  inability  to  supply 
scandium in sufficient quantities, in a reliable and timely manner, and in the correct quality, could reduce 
the demand for any scandium produced from our projects and possibly render the project uneconomic. 

General Risks Associated with our Mining Activities and Company 

We  may  not  receive  permits  necessary  to  proceed  with  the  development  of  a  mining  project.    The 
development  of  any  of  our  properties,  including  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project,  will  require  the 
acquisition and sustained possession of numerous local and national government approvals and permits. 
Our ability to secure all necessary permits required to develop any of our projects is unknown until such 
permits are received. If we cannot obtain or retain  all necessary permits, the  Nyngan Scandium Project 
cannot be developed, and our investment in the project will potentially be lost. While the critical permits 
for the Nyngan Scandium Project have been received, other permits remain outstanding at this time and 
continuing compliance with the terms of the permits is required. Our future market value will likely be 
significantly  reduced  to  the  extent  one  or  more  of  our  projects  cannot  proceed  to  the  development  or 
production stage due to an inability to secure all required permits.   

Mineral Resource Estimates on our properties are subject to uncertainty and may not reflect what may 
be  economically  extracted.    Resource  estimates  included  for  scandium  on  our  Nyngan  property  are 
estimates only and no assurances can be given that the estimated levels of scandium minerals will actually 
be  produced  or  that  we  will  receive  the  metal  prices  assumed  in  determining  our  resources.  Such 
estimates  are expressions  of judgment  based  on knowledge,  mining experience, analysis of drilling and 
exploration  results  and  industry  practices.  Estimates  made  at  any  given  time  may  change  significantly 
when new information becomes available or when parameters that were used for such estimates change. 
By  their  nature  resource  estimates  are  imprecise  and  depend,  to  a  certain  extent,  upon  statistical 
inferences which may ultimately prove unreliable. Furthermore, market price fluctuations in scandium, as 
well as increased capital or production costs or reduced recovery rates, may limit our ability to establish 
reserves at some future point on Nyngan, or on any of our properties. The extent to which more Nyngan 
project  resources  may  ultimately  be  reclassified  as  proven  or  probable  reserves  is  dependent  upon  the 
demonstration of their profitable recovery. The evaluation of reserves or resources is always influenced 
by  economic  and  technological  factors,  which  may  change  over  time.  Accordingly,  further  current 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
resource estimates on our material properties may never be converted into reserves, or be economically 
extracted,  and  we  may  have  to  write  off  such  properties  or  incur  a  loss  on  sale  of  our  interest  on  such 
properties, which will likely reduce the value of our shares. 

Our  potential  for  a  competitive  advantage  in  specialty  and  rare  metals  production  depends  on  the 
availability  of  our  technical  processing  abilities,  as  currently  provided  by  our  Chief  Technology 
Officer.  We are dependent upon the personal efforts and commitment of Willem Duyvesteyn, our CTO, a 
director  and  significant  shareholder  of  the  Company,  for  the  continued  development  of  new  extractive 
technologies related to scandium and other rare and specialty metals production. The loss of the services 
of Mr. Duyvesteyn would likely limit our ability to use or continue the development of such technologies, 
which would remove the potential competitive and economic benefit of such technologies.   

Our  operations  are  subject  to  losses  due  to  exchange  rate  fluctuation.    We  maintain  accounts  in 
Canadian,  Australian,  Euro  and  U.S.  currency.  Our  equity  financings  have  to  date  been  priced  in 
Canadian dollars. All of our material projects and non-cash assets are located outside of both Canada and 
the USA, however, and require regular currency conversions to local currencies where such projects and 
assets  are  located.  Our  operations  are  accordingly  subject  to  foreign  currency  fluctuations  and  such 
fluctuations  may  materially  affect  our  financial  position  and  results.  We  do  not  engage  in  currency 
hedging activities. 

We do not currently earn any revenue and without additional funding, we will not be able to carry out 
our business plan, and if we raise additional funding existing security holders may experience dilution.  
As an exploration stage mining company, none of our principal properties are in operation and we do not 
currently earn any revenue. In order to continue our exploration activities and to meet our obligations on 
the Nyngan Scandium Project, we will need to raise additional funds. Recently, we have relied entirely on 
the sale of our securities to raise funds for operations. Our ability to continue to raise funds from the sale 
of  our  securities  is  subject  to  significant  uncertainty  due  to  volatility  in  the  mineral  exploration 
marketplace.  If we are able to raise funds from the sale of our securities, existing security holders may 
experience  significant  dilution  of  their  ownership  interests  and  possibly  to  the  value  of  their  existing 
securities. 

Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) 
that was first reported from Wuhan, China in December 2019, and the spread of this virus could continue 
to  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  global  economic  conditions  which  may  adversely  impact  our 
business. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global emergency on January 30, 2020 with 
respect to the outbreak and characterized it as a pandemic on March 11, 2020.  Cases of COVID-19 have 
been reported in 223 countries, areas or territories as of February 17, 2021, including China, Australia, the 
United States, Canada and countries in the European Union. The extent to which the outbreak impacts the 
Company’s  business  will  depend  on  future  developments,  which  are  highly  uncertain  and  cannot  be 
predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and 
the actions to contain the outbreak or treat its impact, among others. Moreover, the actual and threatened 
spread of the coronavirus globally could also have a material adverse effect on the regional economies in 
which the Company intends to operate, continue to negatively impact stock markets and adversely impact 
the  Company’s  ability  to  raise  capital. Any  of  these  developments,  and  others,  could  have  a  material 
adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  business.  In  particular,  the  COVID-19  pandemic  has  resulted  in 
restrictions  including  quarantines,  closures,  cancellations  and  travel  restrictions,  which  may  have  a 
material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  business  including  delays  or  disruptions  in  regulatory 
submissions, exploration activities on the Nyngan Scandium Project and CMR Project development. 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES 

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Regarding Resource Estimates 

Certain  terms  used  in  this  section  are  those  used  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  securities 
laws  in  effect  in  Canada,  which  differ  from  the  requirements  of  U.S.  securities  laws.  Canadian 
requirements, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and 
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and resource information contained herein may not be comparable to 
similar information disclosed by U.S. companies.  

In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not equate to 
the term “reserves.” The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are not the same as 
those  of  the  SEC,  and  reserves  reported  in  compliance  with  NI  43-101  may  not  qualify  as  “reserves” 
under SEC standards. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the 
determination  has  been  made  that  the  mineralization  could  be  economically  and  legally  produced  or 
extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.  

The  SEC’s  disclosure  standards  normally  do  not  recognize  information  concerning  “measured  mineral 
resources.”  “indicated  mineral  resources”  or  “inferred  mineral  resources”  or  other  descriptions  of  the 
amount  of  mineralization  in  mineral  deposits  that  do  not  constitute  “reserves”  by  U.S.  standards,  in 
documents  filed  with  the  SEC.  In  addition,  resources  that  are  classified  as  “inferred  mineral  resources” 
have  a  great  amount  of  uncertainty  as  to  their  existence  and  great  uncertainty as  to  their  economic  and 
legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be 
upgraded  to  a  higher  category.  Under  Canadian  rules,  estimated  “inferred  mineral  resources”  may  not 
generally form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. Investors are cautioned not to assume that 
all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable.   

Disclosure  of  “contained  ounces”  in  a  resource  is  permitted  disclosure  under  Canadian  regulations, 
however,  the  SEC  normally  only  permits  issuers  to  report  mineralization  that  does  not  constitute 
“reserves” by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.  

Accordingly,  information  concerning  mineral  deposits  set  forth  herein  may  not  be  comparable  with 
information presented by companies using only U.S. standards in their public disclosure.  

Description of Mineral Projects  

Nyngan Scandium Project 

Property Description and Location 

The Nyngan Scandium Project site is located approximately 450 kilometres northwest of Sydney, NSW, 
Australia  and  approximately  20  kilometres  due  west  from  the  town  of  Nyngan,  a  rural  town  of 
approximately  2,900  people.  The  deposit  is  located  5  kilometres  south  of  Miandetta,  off  the  Barrier 
Highway that connects the town of Nyngan to the town of Cobar. The license area can  be reached via 
the  paved  Barrier  Highway,  which  allows  year-round  access,  but  final  access  to  the  site  itself  is 
reached by  clay  farm  tracks. The general area can be characterized as flat countryside and is classified 
as  agricultural  land,  used  predominantly  for  wheat  farming  and  livestock  grazing.  Infrastructure  in  the 
area is good, with available water and electric power in close proximity to the property boundaries. 

The Nyngan property is classified  as an Australia Property for purposes of financial statement segment 
information. 

15 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The scandium resource is hosted within the lateritic zone of the Gilgai Intrusion, one of several Alaskan-
type mafic and ultramafic bodies which intrude Cambrian-Ordovician metasediments collectively called 
the Girilambone Group. The laterite zone, locally up to 40 meters thick, is layered with hematitic clay at 
the surface followed by limonitic clay, saprolitic clay, weathered bedrock and finally fresh bedrock. The 
scandium mineralization is concentrated within the hematitic, limonitic, and saprolitic zones with values 
up to 350 ppm scandium.  

The general location of the Nyngan Scandium Project is provided in Figure 1 below. The specific location 
of the exploration licenses that we may earn an interest in are provided in Figure 2 below. 

Figure 1:  Location of Nyngan Scandium Project 

Note: None of the Existing Mines identified in Figure 1 produce scandium.  

16 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 

 
 
 
Figure 2:  Location of the Exploration Licenses and Mining Lease for the Nyngan Scandium 
Project 

Mineral License Details 

The scandium resource is held under Exploration License (EL) 8316 (Block Number 3132, units d, e, j, k 
and Block no. 3133, unit f) and EL 6096 (Block 3132, unit p, and Block 3133, units l, m, r and s); a total 
of ten (10) graticular units. The exploration licenses allow the license holder to conduct exploration  on 
private land (with landowner consents and signed compensation agreements in place) and public lands not 
including wildlife reserves, heritage areas or National Parks. The scandium resource is fully enclosed on 
private agricultural land.   

The Company’s Australian subsidiary holds legal title to both the surface and mineral exploration rights 
on the Nyngan Scandium Project.    

During  2017,  an  additional  EL  (EL  8448)  was  granted.  Figure  2  provides  details  of  the  location  of  EL 
8448 and the locations of Mining Lease 1792 and Mining Lease Application 531, both of which overlay 
the exploration license area. 

The exploration licenses cover 29.25 square kilometers (2,925 hectares). The  resource site is located at 
geographic coordinates MGA zone 55, GDA 94, Lat: - 31.5987, Long: 146.9827, Map Sheets 1:250k – 
Cobar (SH/55-14) and 1:100k Hermidale (8234). 

18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  project  surface  rights  (freehold)  total  810  acres  (370  hectares)  on  the  portion  of  the  exploration 
license area corresponding to the Mine Lease 1792 area. The freehold property boundaries are defined by 
standard land survey techniques undertaken by the Lands Department and currently presented in the form 
of  Cadastral  Deposited  Plans  (DP)  and  Lots.  The  land  associated  with  the  project  rights  is  DP  752879, 
Lots 6 and 7 (Appendix 2, Lots 6 and 7 - Nyngan). 

The  Company  is  required  to  lodge  individual  A$10,000  environmental  bonds  with  the  NSW  Mines 
Department for each license, and must meet total minimum work requirements annually of approximately 
A$65,000, covering both licenses.  

Royalties attached to the properties include a 1.5% Net Profits Interest royalty to private parties involved 
with the early exploration on the property, a 1.7% Net Smelter Returns Royalty payable to Jervois for 12 
years after production commences, subject to terms in the settlement agreement, and a 0.7% royalty on 
gross mineral sales to a private investor. Another revenue royalty is payable to private interests of 0.2%, 
subject  to  a  US$370k  cap.  A  NSW  minerals  royalty  will  also  be  levied  on  the  project,  subject  to 
negotiation, currently 4% on revenue. 

Metallurgy Development 

The  Company  has  invested  in  and  developed  methodology  for  extracting  scandium  from  the  Nyngan 
property resource since 2010. A portion of the work done over this period has been superseded by work 
that  followed,  but  subsequent  test  programs  universally  benefitted  from  prior  efforts.  In  summary,  the 
programs have been as follows: 

•  2010  –  The  Company  inherited  work  done  on  Nyngan  from  the  previous  property  owner,  and 
applied that work to a quick flowsheet and capital estimate done for management by Roberts & 
Schaefer of Salt Lake City, Utah; 

•  2011 – The Company employed Hazen Research, Inc., of Golden, Colorado, USA (“Hazen”) to 
test  acid  baking  techniques  and  solvent  extraction  (“SX”)  processes  with  Nyngan  resource 
material.    The  Company  also  employed  SGS-Lakefield  (Ontario)  to  test  pressure  acid  leach 
techniques on Nyngan resource, as a replacement for or an enhancement to acid bake techniques 
done earlier in the year by Hazen; 

•  2012 – The Company engaged SNC-Lavalin to do an economic study for management, utilizing 

an acid bake flowsheet and SX work from the Hazen test program; 

•  2014  –  The  Company  published  a  preliminary  economic  assessment  (“PEA”)  entitled  NI  43-
101F1 Technical Report on the Feasibility of the Nyngan Scandium Project, authored by Larpro 
Pty Ltd, utilizing both Hazen and SGS-Lakefield test work results; and  

•  2015  –  The  Company  amended  and  refiled  the  2014  PEA  Report  as  the  “Amended  Technical 
Report and Preliminary Economic Analysis on the Nyngan Scandium Project, NSW, Australia.”  
•  2016  –  The  Company  published  an  independently  prepared  definitive  feasibility  study (“DFS”) 
on  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project.  The  technical  report  on  the  feasibility  study  entitled 
“Feasibility Study – Nyngan Scandium Project, Bogan Shire, NSW, Australia” was independently 
compiled pursuant to the requirements of NI 43-101 and incorporated the results of current and 
previous test work. 

Nyngan Feasibility Study  

On April 18, 2016, the Company announced the results of an independent definitive feasibility study on 
the Nyngan Scandium Project. The technical report on the feasibility study entitled “Feasibility Study – 
Nyngan Scandium Project, Bogan Shire, NSW, Australia” is dated May 4, 2016 and was independently 

19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
compiled pursuant to the requirements of NI 43-101 (the “Feasibility Study” or “DFS”). The report was 
filed  on  May  6,  2016  and  is  available  on  SEDAR  (www.sedar.com),  the  Company’s  website 
(www.scandiummining.com)  and  the  SEC’s  website  (www.sec.gov).  A  full  discussion  on  the  technical 
report was provided in the Company’s Form 10Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2016, as filed 
with the SEC and on SEDAR on May 13, 2016. 

The  Feasibility  Study  concluded  that  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  has  the  potential  to  produce  an 
average of 37,690 kilograms of scandium oxide (scandia) per year, at grades of 98.0%-99.8%, generating 
an  after-tax  cumulative  cash  flow  over  a  20  year  project  life  of  US$629  million,  with  an  NPV10%  of 
US$177  million.  The  average  process  plant  feed  grade  over  the  20  year  project  life  is  409ppm  of 
scandium. 

The  financial  results  of  the  Feasibility  Study  are  based  on  a  conventional  flow  sheet,  employing 
continuous high pressure acid leach (HPAL) and solvent extraction (SX) techniques. The flow sheet was 
modeled  and  validated  from  METSIM  modeling  and  considerable  bench  scale/pilot  scale  metallurgical 
test work utilising Nyngan resource material. A number of the key elements of this flowsheet work have 
been protected by the Company under US patent applications.   

The Feasibility Study has been developed and compiled to an accuracy level of +15%/-5%, by a globally 
recognized engineering firm that has considerable expertise in laterite deposits and process facilities, as 
well  as  in  smaller  mining  and  processing  projects,  and  has  excellent  familiarity  with  the  Nyngan 
Scandium Project location and environment.  

Nyngan Scandium Project Highlights  

•  Capital cost estimate for the project is US$87.1 million, 
•  Annual scandium oxide product volume averages 37,690 kg, over 20 years, 
•  Annual revenue of US$75.4 million (oxide price assumption of US$2,000/kg), 
•  Operating cost estimate for the project is US$557/kg scandium oxide, 
•  Project Constant Dollar NPV10% is US$177 million, (NPV8% is US$225 million), 
•  Project Constant Dollar IRR is 33.1%, 
•  Oxide product grades of 98-99.8%, as based on customer requirements, 
•  Project resource increases by 40% to 16.9 million tonnes, grading 235ppm Sc, at a 100ppm cut-

off in the measured and indicated categories, and 

•  Project Reserve totalling 1.43 million tonnes, grading 409ppm Sc was established on part of the 

resource. 

DFS Conclusions and Recommendations 

The production assumptions in the Feasibility Study are backed by solid independent flow sheet test work 
on the planned process for scandium recovery. The Feasibility Study consolidates a significant amount of 
metallurgical test work and prior study on the Nyngan Scandium Project, including important test work 
results completed since the PEA was generated in 2014. The entire body of work demonstrates a viable, 
conventional  process  flow  sheet  utilizing  a  continuous-system  HPAL  leaching  process,  and  good 
metallurgical recoveries of scandium from the resource. The metallurgical assumptions are supported by 
various bench and pilot scale independent test work programs that are consistent with known outcomes in 
other laterite resources. A number of the key elements of this flowsheet work have been protected by the 
Company  under  US  Patent  Applications.  The  continuous  autoclave  configuration,  as  opposed  to  batch 
systems explored in previous flow sheets, is also a more conventional and current design choice. 

20 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  level  of  accuracy  established  in  the  Feasibility  Study  substantially  reduces  the  uncertainty  levels 
inherent in earlier studies, specifically the PEA. The greater confidence intervals around the Feasibility 
Study  were  achieved  by  reliance  on  significant  project  engineering  work,  a  capital  and  operating  cost 
estimate supported by detailed requirements and vendor pricing, plus one conditional offtake agreement 
and an independent marketing assessment, both supportive of the marketing assumptions for the business. 

The Feasibility Study delivered a positive result on the Nyngan Scandium Project, and recommends the 
Nyngan  Scandium  Project  owners  seek  finance  and  proceed  to  construction.  Recommendations  were 
made  therein  for  additional  immediate  work,  notably  to  win  additional  offtake  agreements  with 
customers,  complete  some  optimizing  flow  sheet  studies,  and  to  initiate  as  early  as  possible  detailed 
engineering  required  on  certain  long-lead  capital  items.  The  Company  intends  to  act  on  these 
recommendations as financing permits. 

Confirmatory Metallurgical Test Results 

The  final  Nyngan  Project  DFS  contained  several  recommended  confirmatory  process  investigations  be 
undertaken  prior  to  commencing  detailed  engineering  and  construction.  Specific  study  areas  included 
pressure leach (“HPAL”), counter-current decant circuits (“CCD”), solvent extraction (“SX”), and oxalate 
precipitation, with specific work steps suggested in each area. The Company engaged Altrius Engineering 
Services (AES) of Brisbane, Australia to undertake these studies, which AES devised and supervised at 
the SGS laboratory in Perth, Australia and at the Nagrom laboratory in Brisbane, Australia. 

On  June  29,  2016,  the  Company  announced  the  results  of  the  subsequent  AES  metallurgical  test  work, 
which confirmed recoveries and efficiencies that either meet or exceed the parameters used in the DFS.  
Highlights of the independent testing were as follows: 

•  Pressure leach test work achieved 88% recoveries, from larger volume tests, 
•  Settling characteristics of leach discharge slurry show substantial improvement, 
•  Residue neutralization work meets or exceeds all environmental requirements as presented in the 

DFS and the environmental impact statement, 

•  Solvent  extraction  circuit  optimization  tests  generated  improved  performance,  exceeding  99% 

recovery in single pass systems, and 

•  Product  finish  circuits  produced  99.8%  scandium  oxide,  completing  the  recovery  process  from 

Nyngan ore to finished scandia product. 

Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management Contract 

On May 30, 2017, the Company announced that its subsidiary EMC Metals Australia Pty. Ltd. signed an 
Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management ("EPCM") contract with Lycopodium Minerals 
Pty  Ltd  ("Lycopodium"),  to  build  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  in  New  South  Wales,  Australia.  The 
EPCM contract also provides for start-up and commissioning services. 

The  EPCM  contract  appoints  Lycopodium  (Brisbane,  QLD,  Australia)  to  manage  all  aspects  of  project 
construction.  Lycopodium  is  the  principal  engineering  firm  involved  with  the  DFS.  Lycopodium's 
continued  involvement  in  project  construction  and  commissioning  ensures  valuable  technical  and 
management continuity for the project during the construction and start-up of the project. 

On  October  19,  2017,  we  announced  that  Lycopodium  has  been  instructed  to  initiate  critical  path 
engineering  for  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project.  Lycopodium  commenced  work  on  select  critical  path 
components for the project, including design and specification engineering on the high-pressure autoclave 

21 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
unit,  associated  flash  and  splash  vessels  and  several  specialized  high-pressure  input  pumps.  The 
engineering work was completed in 2018 and will enable final supplier selection, firm component pricing 
and delivery dates for these key process components. 

Environmental Permitting/Development Consent/Mining Lease  

On May 2, 2016, the Company announced the filing of an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) with 
the  New  South  Wales,  Australia,  Department  of  Planning  and  Environment,  (the  “Department”)  in 
support  of  the  planned  development  of  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project.  The  EIS  was  prepared  by  R.W. 
Corkery  &  Co.  Pty.  Limited,  on  behalf  of  the  Company’s  subsidiary,  EMC  Metals  Australia  Pty.  Ltd. 
(“EMC Australia”), to support an application for Development Consent for the Nyngan Scandium Project. 
The  EIS  is  a  complete  document,  including  a  Specialist  Consultants  Study  Compendium,  and  was 
submitted to the Department on April 29, 2016.   

EIS Highlights:   

•  The EIS finds residual environmental impacts represent negligible risk. 
•  The proposed development design achieves sustainable environmental outcomes. 
•  The EIS finds net-positive social and economic outcomes for the community. 
•  Nine  independent  environmental  consulting  groups  conducted  analysis  over  five  years,  and 

contributed report findings to the EIS. 

•  The  Nyngan  project  development  is  estimated  to  contribute  A$12.4M  to  the  local  and  regional 

economies, and A$39M to the State and Federal economies, annually 

•  The  EIS  is  fully  aligned  with  the  DFS  and  with  a  NSW  Mining  License  Application  for  the 

Nyngan project. 

Conclusion statement in the EIS: 

“In light of the conclusions included throughout this Environmental Impact Statement, it is assessed that 
the Proposal could be constructed and operated in a manner that would satisfy all relevant statutory goals 
and criteria, environmental objectives and reasonable community expectations.” 

EIS Discussion: 

The  EIS  is  the  foundation  document  submitted  by  a  developer  intending  to  build  a  mine  facility  in 
Australia.    The  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  is  considered  a  State  Significant  Project,  in  that  capital  cost 
exceeds  A$30million,  which  means  State  agencies  are  designated  to  manage  the  investigation  and 
approval process for granting a Development Consent, from the Minister of Planning and Environment. 
This  Department  will  manage  the  review  of  the  Proposal  through  a  number  of  State  and  local 
governmental agencies.  

The  EIS  is  a  self-contained  set  of  documents  used  to  seek  a  Development  Consent.    It  is  however, 
supported in many ways by the recently completed DFS. 

On November 10, 2016, the Company announced that the Development Consent had been granted. This 
Development Consent represents an approval to develop the Nyngan Scandium Project and is based on 
the EIS. The Development Consent follows an in-depth review of the EIS, the project plan, community 
impact studies, public EIS exhibition and commentary, and economic viability, and involved more than 
12 specialized governmental agencies and groups. 

22 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mining Lease: 

During July 2019, EMC Australia received notice of approval for its mining lease (ML) application. The 
ML (ML 1792) overlays select areas previously covered by exploration licenses and represents the final 
major  development  approval  required  from  the  NSW  Government  to  begin  construction  on  the  project. 
The ML 1792 grant is issued for a period of 21 years and is based on the development plans and intent 
submitted in the ML application. The ML can be modified by NSW regulatory agencies, as requested by 
EMC Australia over time, to reflect changing operating conditions. 

In  addition  to  these  two  key  governmental  approvals,  other  required  licenses  and  permits  must  be 
acquired  but  are  considered  routine  and  require  only  compliance  with  fixed  standards  and  objective 
measurements.  These  remaining  approvals  include  submittal  of  numerous  plans  and  reports  supporting 
compliance with Development Consent and Mining Lease. In addition, the following water, roads, dam 
and electrical access reviews and arrangements must be finalized:   

•  Water Supply Works and Use Approval and Water Access License,  
•  State and local approval for construction of the intersection of the Site Access Road and Gilgai 

Road, 

•  An  approval  from  the  NSW  Dams  Safety  Committee  for  the  design  and  construction  of  the 

Residue Storage Facility, and 

•  A high voltage connection agreement with Essential Energy.  

The 2019 ML 1792 grant covers 810 acres (370 hectares) of surface area fully owned by the Company, an 
area adequate to construct  and operate a scandium  mine of a scale outlined in the definitive Feasibility 
Study. The Company had originally filed a mining lease application (MLA 531) covering an area of 874 
hectares, which was granted in 2017 as a mining lease (ML 1763), and later ruled invalid. At that time, it 
was unknown, to both the Department and the Company, that a local landowner had filed a prior, timely 
and valid  objection to the  granting of that mining lease. The reduction in area  between the initial 2017 
ML  1763  and  the  replacement  2019  ML  1792  represented  acreage  protested  in  an  “Agricultural  Land” 
objection lodged by a local landowner. The landowner holds freehold surface ownership over a portion of 
the original grant that was previously covered by the 2017 ML 1763. 

On September 10, 2020, the Company announced receipt of a final determination letter from the Deputy 
Secretary, Department of Regional NSW, Division of Mining, Exploration and Geoscience resolving the 
outstanding objection filed by the landowner in 2016.  

Written  advice  from  the  Department  to  the  Company  makes  clear  that  all  required  independent 
investigative processes, and all affected party comment periods, are now completed, and the Department’s 
decision  is  final.  There  are  further  state  courts  of  appeal  available  to  the  landowner,  but  the  facts 
supporting  this  final  decision  are  confirmed  by  the  NSW  Department  of  Primary  Industry  and  follow 
governing law.   

This  Final  Determination  from  the  NSW  Government  will  again  allow  all  measured  and  indicated 
resource included in the Nyngan Scandium Project DFS to be reinstated in a new mining lease grant, for 
which the Company intends to file application. 

Patent Application Filings 

Patent Application Filings 
The Company is in the process of establishing a significant portfolio of intellectual property through the 
filing of scandium related patents both in the US and abroad.  

23 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To date, the following seven US patents have been granted to the Company: 

TBD 
10,450,634 
10,378,085 

10,260,127 
9,982,326 
9,982,325 

8,372,367 

Scandium Master Alloy Production 
Scandium-Containing Master Alloys And Method For Making The Same   
Recovery Of Scandium Values Through Selective Precipitation Of Hematite And 
Basic Iron Sulfates From Acid Leachates   
Method For Recovering Scandium Values From Leach Solutions   
Solvent Extraction Of Scandium From Leach Solutions   
Systems And Methodologies For Direct Acid Leaching Of Scandium-Bearing 
Ores   
System and Method for Recovering Boron Values from Plant Tailings 

Below is a list of thirteen US patents that have been filed, but have not been granted yet:  

US20200001407 

US20190161827 
US20160289795 
US20190218645 
  US20120305452 
US20110298270 

  US2012005585l 

US20120204680 

US20120207656 

Provisional (4) 

Control Of Recrystallization In Cold-Rolled AlMn(Mg)ScZr Sheets For 
Brazing Applications   
Extraction Of Scandium Values From Copper Leach Solutions   
Systems and Processes for Recovering Scandium Values From Laterite Ores   
Direct Scandium Alloying   
Dry, Stackable Tailings and Methods for Producing the Same   
In Situ Ore Leaching Using Freeze Barriers   
Low Carbon Dioxide Footprint for Coal Liquefaction 
System and Method for Recovery of Nickel Values From Nickel-Containing 
Ores. 
System and Method for Recovery of Scandium Values From Scandium-
Containing Ores 
Titles not yet publicly disclosed 

Patent Applications Discussion: 

•  These patents and patent applications cover novel, unique flowsheet designs, applicable to both 

scandium extraction and other metals extraction; 

•  The patented designs on scandium are largely supported by test work done with Nyngan 

Scandium Project resource material and known design parameters; 

•  The scandium patents cover HPAL system material flows, solvent extraction (SX), ion exchange 
systems (“IX”), atmospheric tank and heap leaching systems and techniques, and processes for 
directly making select master alloys containing scandium; and 

•  A number of the scandium-focussed designs are incorporated as part of the DFS. 
•  Recovery by-product scandium from certain other mineral resources is also covered. 
•  Recovery of base metals, such as copper, cobalt, nickel, manganese and aluminum from process 

solutions or waste products is also covered. 

•  Use of scandium in lithium-ion batteries is addressed. 

These patent applications, filed with the US Patent Office, protect the Company’s position and rights to 
the intellectual property (IP) contained and identified in the applications as of the date filed, within the 
worldwide jurisdiction limits of the US patent system. Review by the US Patent Office will take further 
time, but the dates of filing these patents define the basis of IP ownership claims, as is generally afforded 
U.S. patentholders. 

The Company intends to utilize the IP contained in these process patents in the development of process 

24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
flowsheets for recovery of scandium from its Nyngan Scandium Project, as well as its Honeybugle 
project, and potentially from future by-product opportunities from leach solutions and/or waste products. 
The  Company  believes  that  patent  protection  of  these  specific,  novel  process  designs  will  be  granted. 
Many  of  the  basic  design  elements  contemplated  in  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  flowsheet  are 
commonly applied to other specialty metals, particularly nickel. However, the application of these basic 
design elements has not been commonly applied to scandium extraction from laterite resources, and there 
are  enough  intended  and  required  operational  differences  in  the  application  to  permit  the  Company  to 
patent-protect IP on those differences. 

These  patent  claims  are  the  result  of  ten  years  of  metallurgical  test  work  with  independent  resource 
laboratories and specific design work by Willem Duyvesteyn, the Company’s Chief Technology Officer. 
This work is ongoing. Patent protection on flowsheet intellectual property will serve to limit or prevent 
the unauthorized use of that IP by others without the Company’s consent. We believe these filings are an 
important action to protect the ownership of a Company asset, on behalf of all SCY shareholders. 

Downstream Scandium Products 

In February 2011, we announced results of a series of laboratory-scale tests investigating the production 
of aluminum-scandium master alloys directly from aluminum oxide and scandium oxide feed materials. 
The overall objective of this research was to demonstrate and commercialize the production of aluminum-
scandium  master  alloy  using  impure  scandium  oxide  as  the  scandium  source,  potentially  significantly 
improving  the  economics  of  aluminum-scandium  master  alloy  production.  In  2014,  the  Company 
announced it applied for a US patent on master alloy production, which is still in the application phase.  

During the 2015-2017 timeframe, we continued our own internal laboratory-scale investigations into the 
production of aluminum-scandium master alloys, furthering our understanding of commercial processes, 
and  achievable  recoveries.    We  advanced  our  abilities  to  make  a  standard-grade  2%  scandium  master 
alloy product typical of commercially available products offered today. 

On  March  2,  2017,  we  announced  the  signing  of  a  Memorandum  of  Understanding  ("MOU")  with 
Weston Aluminium Pty Ltd. ("Weston") of Chatswood, NSW, Australia. The MOU defines a cooperative 
commercial  alliance  to  jointly  develop  the  capability  to  manufacture  aluminum-scandium  master  alloy.  
The intended outcome of this alliance will be to develop the capability to offer Nyngan Scandium Project 
aluminum alloy customers scandium in form of Al-Sc master alloy, should customers prefer that product 
form. 

The MOU outlines steps to jointly establish the manufacturing parameters, metallurgical processes, and 
capital  requirements  to  convert  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  scandium  product  into  Master  Alloy,  on 
Weston's  existing  production  site  in  NSW.  The  MOU  does  not  include  a  binding  contract  with 
commercial terms at this stage, although the intent is to pursue the necessary technical elements to arrive 
at a commercial contract for conversion of scandium oxide to master alloy, and to do so prior to first mine 
production from the Nyngan Scandium Project. 

On March 5, 2018, the Company announced that it had initiated a small-scale pilot program (4kg scale) at 
the  Alcereco  Inc.  metallurgical  research  facilities  in  Kingston,  Ontario,  to  confirm  and  refine  previous 
lab-scale work on the manufacture of aluminum-scandium 2% master alloy (MA). The program advanced 
the  process  understanding  for  commercial  scale  upgrade  of  Nyngan  scandium  oxide  product  to  master 
alloy product.   

The 2018 pilot program consisted of five separate trials on two MA product types, production of MA in 
various forms, and dross analysis to ascertain scandium recoveries to product. The mass of master alloy 

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
and  product  variants  produced  in  the  program  totaled  approximately  20kg  and  was  completed  in 
December of 2018.  The results of the program included the successful production of 2% grade MA, with 
recoveries of scandium to product of 85%. 

A second phase of the small-scale pilot program was initiated in the first half of 2019, again at 4kg scale, 
building on the work done in phase I.  The results of this second program included successful production 
of 2% grade MA, with improvements in form of rapid kinetics, and recoveries of scandium to product of 
+90%.  

On  March  5,  2018,  the  Company  also  announced  that  it  filed  for  patent  protection  on  certain  process 
refinements for master alloy manufacture that it believes are novel methods, and also on certain product 
variants  that  it  believes  represent  novel  forms  of  introducing  scandium  more  directly  into  aluminum 
alloys.  

Master Alloy Capability Demonstrated  

On February 24, 2020, the Company announced the completion of a three year, three stage  program to 
demonstrate the capability to manufacture aluminum-scandium  master alloy (Al-Sc2%), from scandium 
oxide, using a patent pending melt process involving aluminothermic reactions. 

This  master  alloy  capability  will  allow  the  Company  to  offer  scandium  product  from  the  Nyngan 
Scandium Project in a form that is used directly by aluminum alloy manufacturers globally, either major 
integrated manufacturers or smaller wrought or casting alloy consumers. 

Research Highlights: 

•  Program achieved full 2% target product quality requirement, 
•  Sc recoveries from oxide exceeded target, demonstrated in final tests, 
•  The microstructure and metal quality meet major alloy producers’ specifications, 
•  Rapid kinetics achieved, important for commercial viability, 
• 
•  Successful  program  testing  forms  a  basis  for  a  larger  scale  demonstration  facility,  supporting 

Individual testing batches done at 4kg scale, and 

large scale samples required for industrial aluminum alloy trials. 

Focus on Aluminum Alloy Applications for Scandium Products 

The Company is in the process of obtaining sales agreements for scandium products produced from our 
Nyngan Scandium Project. Our focus is on the use of scandium as an alloying ingredient in aluminum-
based products. The specific scandium product forms we intend to sell from the Nyngan project include 
both scandium oxide (Sc2O3) and aluminum-scandium master alloys (Al-Sc 2%). 

Scandium as an alloying agent in aluminum allows for aluminum metal products that are much stronger, 
more easily weldable and exhibit improved performance at higher temperatures than current aluminum-
based materials. This also means lighter structures, lower manufacturing costs and improved performance 
in areas that aluminum alloys do not currently compete. 

Aluminum Alloy Research Partner – Alcereco 

In  2015,  the  Company  entered  into  a  memorandum  of  understanding  (“MOU”)  with  Alcereco  Inc.  of 
Kingston,  Ontario  (“Alcereco”),  forming  a  strategic  alliance  to  develop  markets  and  applications  for 

26 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
aluminum alloys containing scandium.  This MOU represented keen mutual interest in foundry-based test 
work on aluminum alloys containing scandium, based on understandings that Alcereco’s team had gained 
from prior work with Alcan Aluminum, and based on SCY’s twin goals of understanding and identifying 
quality applications for scandium, and also understanding the scandium value proposition for customers.   

The Company subsequently sponsored considerable research work with the Alcereco team. This work has 
developed and documented the improvement in strength characteristics scandium can deliver to aluminum 
alloys without degrading other key properties.  The Alcereco team  has run  multiple alloy mix programs 
where  scandium  loading  is  varied,  in  order  to  look  at  response  to  scandium  additions  on  a  cost/benefit 
basis.    This  work  has  been  done  in  the  context  of  industries  and  applications  where  these  alloys  are 
suitable for application today. The programs focused on 1000 series, 3000 Series, 5000 Series and 7000 
Series  Al-Sc  alloys,  and  have  served  to  make  independent  data  and  volume  samples  available  for  sales 
efforts. 

Along with the signing of the MOU in 2015, the parties also signed an offtake agreement for scandium 
sales  from  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project.  The  2015  offtake  agreement  specified  product  prices,  annual 
delivery volumes, and timeframes for commencement of delivery of scandium oxide product. This offtake 
agreement expired in late 2017 and was renewed on similar price/volume terms, although the sale product 
was redefined to an aluminum-scandium 2% master alloy. Neither of these offtake agreements contained 
a  mandatory annual minimum purchase volume of  scandium product by Alcereco, nor any  requirement 
for payment in lieu of purchase. 

The  2017  Alcereco  offtake  agreement  expired  in  December  2020,  and  was  not  renewed  by  the  parties.  
Alcereco was seeking new company sponsorship at this time, was financially distressed, and the parties 
could  see  no  benefit  to  renewal  under  those  circumstances.  Alcereco  had  notified  SCY  of  a  planned 
closure of operations in December, with future re-start possibilities unknown. Alcereco halted operations 
in late December, at which time all current programs with SCY were completed. 

The  results  of  our  research  work  with Alcereco  are  positive,  and consistent  with  the body  of  published 
literature  available  today  on  aluminum  scandium  alloys.  We  are  observing  noteworthy  strengthening 
effects  with  scandium  additions  at  and  above  0.1%,  and  dramatic  strengthening  improvements  with 
additions of 0.3%, while preserving or enhancing other alloy properties and characteristics. We have also 
demonstrated  that  alloy  hardening  process  techniques  can  have  significant  effect  on  the  final  alloy 
properties,  offering  the  opportunity  to  tune  alloy  characteristics  to  suit  specific  applications.  These 
findings  belong  to  SCY,  and  can  continue  to  be  shared  with  select  potential  customers,  as  is  deemed 
relevant to their specific areas of commercial interest. 

Letters of Intent with Potential Customers 

During 2018 and 2019, the Company announced that it entered into letter of intent (“LOI”) agreements 
with  nine  unrelated  partnering  entities.  In  each  LOI,  we  have  agreed  to  contribute  scandium  samples, 
either in form of scandium master alloy product, or aluminum-scandium alloy product, for trial testing by 
the partners in their downstream manufacturing applications 

These formal LOI sampling agreements, with distinct industry segment leaders, represent a key marketing 
program  for  the  Company,  demonstrating  how  scandium  will  perform  in  specific  products  and  in 
production-specific  environments.  Potential  scandium  customers  insist  on  these  sample  testing 
opportunities, directly in their research facilities or on their shop floor, to ensure their full understanding 
of the impacts and benefits of introducing scandium into their traditional aluminum feedstocks.  

The partnering entities in these LOI agreements are set out below:  

27 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Austal  Ltd.  (“Austal”),  headquartered  in  Henderson,  Western  Australia,  (Australia).  Austal  is  a  public 
corporation,  listed  on  the  Australian  Stock  Exchange  (ASB.ASX),  with  shipbuilding  facilities  in  Perth, 
Australia,  Mobile,  Alabama  (USA),  Vung  Tau,  Vietnam  and  Balamban,  Cebu  (Philippines).  The 
company is a recognized world leader in the design and construction of large aluminum commercial and 
defense vessels. 

Impression  Technologies  Ltd.  (“ITL”),  based  in  Coventry,  UK.  ITL  is  a  privately  held  technology 
company,  developing  and  licensing  its  advanced  aluminum  forming  technology,  Hot  Form  Quench 
(“HFQ®”), to automotive, aerospace, rail and electronics industries, globally.  

PAB  Coventry  Ltd.  (“PAB”),  based  in  Coventry,  UK.  PAB  is  a  privately  held  manufacturing  and 
prototyping  company  offering  specialty  metal  parts  and  design  capabilities,  serving  the  automotive, 
aerospace, defense and HVAC industries.   

Eck Industries Inc. (“Eck”), based in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, USA. Eck is a privately held manufacturer 
of  precision  sand  cast  parts,  and  engineering  services.  Customer  segments  include  commercial  aircraft 
parts, automotive and trucking cast parts, military drivetrain casings, marine propulsion system castings, 
and military aerospace components.  

Grainger  &  Worrall  Ltd.  (“GW”),  based  in  Shropshire,  UK.  GW  is  a  privately  held  manufacturer  of 
precision sand cast parts,  and engineering services.  GW is  a  well-recognized precision air-set sand cast 
parts  manufacturer  in  the  UK,  specializing  in  low  to  intermediate  volume  cast  parts  for  commercial 
automotive, motorsports/racing, defense, marine, and aerospace applications.  

Gränges  AB  (“Gränges”),  based  in  Stockholm,  Sweden.  Gränges  is  a  public  company,  traded  on  the 
NASDAQ Stockholm Stock Exchange (GRNG:OMX), and a large global player in the rolled aluminum 
products  business,  with  production  assets  in  Europe,  USA,  and  China.  Gränges  holds  a  leading  global 
position in rolled products for brazed heat exchangers. 

Ohm & Häner Metallwerk GmbH & Co. GK (“O&H”), based in Olpe, Germany. O&H is a privately held 
manufacturer of sand cast and gravity die cast parts, servicing a significant, global customer base.  

AML  Technologies  (“AML”),  is  an  Adelaide,  Australia  based  start-up  company  with  proprietary 
technology for applying aluminum wire alloys to additive manufacturing (3D printing) processes.  

Bronze-Alu  Group (“BAL”), based  in  La  Couture-Boussey,  northern  France.  BAL  is  a  privately  held 
precision  high-pressure  die  cast  parts  manufacturer,  offering  prototyping,  machining,  finishing  and 
engineering services.  

These LOI agreements are part of the Company’s marketing strategy to engage with innovative, research-
capable partners, willing to test scandium in their applications. The various programs cover a wide range 
of specific testing and R&D efforts. Some of these trials delivered positive results to our program, while 
others did not show clear benefits from scandium additions, particularly as they relate to specific parts or 
individual  partner  processes.  Each  of  the  results  has,  however,  progressed  the  Company  forward  in  the 
pursuit of applications for scandium in aluminum alloys that outperform the incumbent alloy choices. 

These  programs  have  had  very  encouraging  results  in  both  the  wrought  and  casting  segments  of  the 
aluminum  marketplace.  Scandium  has  demonstrated  an  ability  to  deliver  meaningful  strength 
improvement, both at ambient temperature and at significantly elevated temperature, along with improved 
corrosion  resistance,  and  superior  welding  characteristics,  and  to  do  so  without  diminished  electrical 

28 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
conductivity, where that property is also demanded. These benefits have been documented by our work 
with  Alcereco,  reinforced  by  these  commercial  partner  trials  and  testing,  and  will  continue  to  support 
future customer trials and sales discussions. 

The  Company  has  similar  agreements  with  other  research  capable  partners  whom  do  not  wish  to  be 
publicly named at this time. The emphasis for the program is now to seek out additional testing partners 
who we know are best suited to advancing the scandium story. That priority comes in front of any ability 
to  disclose  those  partners  and  ongoing  programs  prior  to  recognizing  results.  The  Company  plans  to 
conduct  further  application-specific  programs  in  pursuit  of  sales  contracts  with  quality  aluminum  alloy 
customers across numerous industry segments. 

Cerium-Scandium Aluminum Alloy Program Agreement  

On  February  27,  2020,  the  Company  announced  signing  a  Program  Agreement  with  Eck  Industries 
(“ECK”)  located  in  Manitowoc,  Wisconsin,  to  pursue  novel  alloy  development  of  a  combined  cerium-
scandium aluminum alloy, based on previous work done independently by the companies in this area. 

The  companies  intend  to  pursue  alloy  refinements  in  both  wrought  and  cast  alloy  applications, 
specifically  targeting  property  improvements  related  to  strength,  corrosion  resistance,  and  heat-working 
tolerance, principally in A5000 series alloys. 

Program Highlights: 

Joint economic and technical support to alloy design, 
Joint sharing of previous data, and new data produced from this program,  

• 
• 
•  Samples  production  for  customer  trials,  either  as  cast  products,  or  wrought  sample  shapes  for 

various potential customers and alloy manufacturers,  
• 
Initial high value application expected to be in marine applications, and 
•  Program work is protected by existing patent applications filed by ECK. 

Use Of Scandium In Lithium-Ion Batteries 

On September 24, 2020 the Company announced the filing of a provisional patent application with the US 
Patent  Office  seeking  patent  rights  on  various  applications  of  scandium  in  lithium-ion  batteries.  The 
patent  application  covers  a  number  of  scandium  enhancements,  including  doping  potential  for  both 
anodes and cathodes, and for solid electrolytes. 

Patent Application Highlights: 

•  US Patent Application filed for use of scandium in lithium-ion battery applications. 
•  Scandium doping applications are explained for anodes, cathodes and electrolytes. 
•  Scandium offers conductivity advantages as a dopant, over other options, and 
•  Scandium  in  other  aluminum  components  offers  numerous  property  improvements,  including 

conductivity, strength and corrosion resistance. 

Patent Application Discussion: 

Rechargeable  lithium-ion  batteries  (LIBs)  are  a  staple  of  everyday  life.  The  search  for  improved 
performance  through  design  and  materials  advances  is  intense  today.  Considerable  effort  is  being 
expended  in  developing  next-generation  materials  for  LIBs  that  will  make  batteries  safer,  lighter,  more 

29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
durable, faster to charge, more powerful, and more cost-effective. A sampling of some these efforts are as 
follows: 

•  Minimizing  or  removing  cobalt  from  cathode  materials,  based  on  cost,  supply  and  geographic 

• 

sourcing issues.  
Improving the durability of liquid electrolytes with dopants, or substitution with safer and higher 
performing liquid or solid electrolyte systems.  

•  Designing for higher voltage potential by utilizing different anode or cathode materials.  
•  Determining combinations of metals that can better withstand harsh internal conditions.  
•  Scandium, along with other specialty metals, has a clear role to play in each of these areas.  

One  particularly  promising  area  for  scandium  contributions  is  in  a  lithium  nickel  manganese  oxide 
(LNMO) battery. The cathode in this design substitutes manganese for cobalt and supports a higher nickel 
content  as  well.  The  substitution  then  delivers  higher  working  potentials  (voltage),  higher  energy 
densities,  and  faster  charge/discharge  rates,  all  of  which  offer  the  promise  of  improved  battery 
performance. 

Delivering  on  that  promise  requires  a  number  of  improvements,  including  employing  a  dopant  for 
stabilization  of  the  manganese  in  the  LNMO  cathode,  potential  stabilization  of  lithium  titanate  (LTO) 
anode materials as well, and use of dopants to improve the conductivity of both these anode and cathode 
materials.  Conventional liquid electrolytes may see improved function and longevity with the improved 
cathode  and  anode  conductivity.  Scandium  represents  a  suitable  and  effective  dopant  in  each  of  these 
applications. 

Solid state electrolytes (SSEs) represent another potential break-through improvement in LIBs. They will 
handle  higher  voltages,  higher  temperatures,  greater  power  densities,  are  potentially  easier  to  package, 
and are considered safer in use. Scandium represents a suitable and effective dopant in these applications, 
analogous to the use of scandium to stabilize solid zirconia electrolytes in solid oxide fuel cells. Recently 
technical papers (available upon request) covering the use of Lithium Super Ion Conductors (LiSICON) 
for  SSEs  have  indicated  that  primary  compounds  containing  scandium,  such  as  Li3Sc2(PO4)3,  LiScP2O7 
and  Li3Sc(BO3)2,  LiScO2  as  well  as  certain  doped  compounds  such  as  Li1.33ScSi0.33P1.67O7,  
Li3.375Mg0.375Sc0.625(BO3)2, Li1.5Al0.33Sc0.17Ge1.5(PO4)3,  etc.  can  provide  desirable  crystal  structural 
frameworks  for  solid  state  electrolytes.  Non-oxide  LiSICON  fast  conductors  have  also  been  identified 
recently, such as some lithium cryolite types: Li3ScCl6, as well as its fluoride counterpart Li3ScF6. 

Lithium-ion  batteries  employ  aluminum  in  a  number  of  areas,  specifically  in  cathode  structure,  current 
connectors, and in general battery structure. Aluminum-scandium alloys represent an enhanced aluminum 
alloy option, based on their combination of conductivity and strength. 

The  intent  of  this  SCY  patent  filing  was  to  advise  the  battery  industry  that  scandium  is  a  prospective 
dopant choice for enhanced performance of LIBs, both under existing design parameters and in particular 
for  next-gen  LNMO  batteries.  We  want  to  ensure  that  battery  research  and  design  groups  consider 
scandium  additions,  amongst  their  various  materials  choices,  as  they  race  to  build  a  better  lithium-ion 
battery. 

Nyngan Scandium Project - Planned Activities for 2021-2022 

The following development steps are planned for the Company’s initiatives in 2021 and 2022; 

•  Pursue scandium offtake agreements in support of future scandium product sales, 

30 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•  Seek copper industry host(s) for a CMR Project development.  
•  CMR  development  includes  a  project  LOI  and  advanced  test  work,  pilot  plant  studies,  and 

marketing samples generation in 2021,   

•  Negotiate customer sales contracts for specific products planned for production, and raise capital 

for a CMR Project in 2022, on basis of success in a development program,  

•  Commence  construction  of  a  CMR  separation  facility  and  an  off-site  product  finish  plant,  in 

2022. 
Initiate project commissioning in early 2023, with product available for sale by mid-year 2023. 

• 

Honeybugle Scandium Property 

On April 2, 2014 the Company announced that it had secured a 100% interest in an exploration license 
(EL  7977)  covering  34.7  square  kilometers  in  New  South  Wales  (NSW),  Australia  referred  to  as  the 
Honeybugle Scandium property. The license area is located approximately 24 kilometers west-southwest 
from  SCY’s  Nyngan  Scandium  Project.  The  license  area  covers  part  of  the  Honeybugle  geologic 
complex, and will carry that name in our future references to the property. The ground was released by 
the prior holder, and SCY intends to explore the property for scandium and other metals. 

The Company does not consider the Honeybugle Scandium property to be a material property at this time.  
No resources or reserves are known to exist on the property. The property is classified as an Australian 
property for purposes of financial statement segment information. 

The location of the Honeybugle Scandium property is provided below. 

Figure 4. Location of Honeybugle Scandium property 

Honeybugle Drill Results 

On May 7, 2014 the Company announced completion of an initial program of 30 air core (AC) drill holes 
on  the  property,  specifically  at  the  Seaford  anomaly,  targeting  scandium  (Sc).    Results  on  13  of  these 
holes  are  shown  in  detail  in  the  table  below.  These  holes  suggest  the  potential  for  scandium 
mineralization on the property similar to our Nyngan Scandium Project. 

Highlights of initial drilling program results are as follows: 

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•  The highest 3-meter intercept graded 572 ppm scandium (hole EHAC 11); 
•  EHAC  11  also  generated  two  additional  high  grade  scandium  intercepts,  grading  510  ppm  and 

415 ppm, each over 3 meters; 

•  The program identified a 13-hole cluster which was of particular interest; 
• 

Intercepts on these 13 holes averaged 270 ppm scandium over a total 273 meters at an average 
continuous  thickness  of  21  meters  per  hole,  representing  a  total  of  57%  (354  meters)  of  total 
initial program drilling; 

•  The 13 holes produced 29 individual (3-meter) intercepts over 300 ppm, representing 31% of the 

mineralized intercepts in the 273 meters of interest; and 

•  This  initial  30-hole  AC  exploratory  drill  program  generated  a  total  of  620  meters  of  scandium 

drill/assay results, over approximately 1 square kilometer on the property.  

The detail results of 13 holes in the initial drill program are as follows: 

Table 7. Results of 13-Hole Initial Drill Program 

       Honeybugle 30 Hole Drill Program - April 2014    Target-Scandium

Drill Hole
Number
EHAC 1

Honeybugle
Drill
Area
Seaford

EHAC 2

Seaford

EHAC 3

Seaford

EHAC 5

Seaford

EHAC 6

Seaford

EHAC 7

Seaford

EHAC 9

Seaford

EHAC 10
EHAC 11

Seaford
Seaford

EHAC 12
EHAC 26

EHAC 28

EHAC 29

Seaford
Seaford
Seaford
Seaford
Seaford
Seaford

Hole
Type
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including
including
Explore (AC)
including
including
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
Explore (AC)
including
including
Explore (AC)
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including
Explore (AC)
including

From
(meter
depth)
21
27
0
0
3
6
0
12
0
0
18
9
15
42
6
9
0
0
9
21
0
0
3
0
3
3
9

Assumes 175 ppm cut-off grade

To
(meter
depth)
42
36
12
9
12
9
15
15
24
9
24
51
42
51
27
24
18
30
15
24
21
21
18
18
15
21
18

Intercept
Length
(meters)
21
9
12
9
9
3
15
3
24
9
6
42
27
9
21
15
18
30
6
3
21
21
15
18
12
18
9

Total
Scandium
Grade (ppm)
218
262
300
333
295
352
244
333
185
214
214
225
220
252
272
350
251
369
461
572
177
309
343
344
363
316
396

Seaford  is  characterized  by  extensive  outcrops  of  dry,  iron-rich  laterites,  allowing  for  a  particularly 
shallow drill program. Thirty (30) air core (AC) holes on nominal 100-meter spacing were planned, over 

32 

 
 
 
 
 
 
an area of approximately 1 square kilometer. Four holes were halted in under 10 meters depth, based on 
thin laterite beds, low scandium grades, and shallow bedrock. 

The 13 holes highlighted in the table are grouped together on either side of Coffills Lane, and represent 
all of the drill locations where meaningful intercept thickness generated scandium grades exceeding 175 
ppm.  Some  of  these  13  holes  showed  significant  scandium  values  on  the  immediate  surface,  and 
alternately,  other  holes  exhibited  favorable  scandium  grades  that  began  at  shallow  depth.  The  highest 
grade Sc sample was found in a 21-24 meter interval (572 ppm), although several holes produced better 
than  350 ppm  Sc  intercepts  at  depths of  under  9  meters.  The  deepest  hole  (EHAC  7)  was  drilled  to  57 
meters, showing good scandium grades over a 12-meter horizon (245 ppm) near the bottom of the hole, 
from 39 to 51 meters depth.  Higher scandium grades were associated with higher iron levels. Holes were 
drilled to a depth where they contacted the fresh ultramafic bedrock, which generally signaled the end of 
any scandium enrichment zones.  

The  drill  plan  divided  Seaford  into  four  sub-areas,  1-4,  as  highlighted  Figure  5,  below.    Area  1  was 
relatively  higher  ground  and  therefore  the  least  impacted  by  ground  moisture.  Consequently,  this  dryer 
area  received  the  greatest  attention,  although  that  had  been  the  general  intention  in  the  plan.  Area  1 
received 17 holes, with 13 presented in detail in the table above. Areas 2-4 were each intended as step-out 
areas  that  need  to  be  further  examined  in  the  next  program.  The  three  step-out  areas  did  not  generate 
results of particular note, although hole locations were not optimal due to ground conditions and access. 

Area 2 received 3 holes, 60 meters total, and generated Sc grades from 45-75 ppm, 
Area 3 received 4 holes, 87 meters total, and generated Sc grades from 47-122 ppm, 
Area 4 received 5 holes, 72 meters total, and generated Sc grades from 60-101 ppm, and 
The average depth of all of these holes was 18 meters, with the deepest 30 meters. 

Highlighted
Drill Results

Drill Area 3

Drill Area 2

Drill Area 1

Drill Area 4

Figure 5. Initial Drill Program Map 

This 13-hole cluster (Area 1) was noted to be in a relatively thick laterite zone which was constrained to 
the west by contact with meta-sediments, to the east by fresh ultramafic bedrock, and to some extent in 
the north by a poor intersection result in hole 30. Area 1 remains somewhat open to the south, with the 

33 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
two southern-most holes (EHAC 9 and EHAC 29) generating some of the best scandium grade intercepts 
in the area. 

The  surface  and  near  surface  mineralization  at  this  property  is  an  advantage,  both  in  locating  areas  of 
interest for future exploration work, and also because of extremely low overburden ratios. This particular 
characteristic  for  the  Honeybugle  Scandium  property  is  different  from  our  Nyngan  Scandium  Project, 
where mineralization is typically covered by 10-20 meters of barren alluvium. 

Further  drilling  at  Seaford  is  warranted,  based  on  the  results  of  this  introductory  and  modest  program, 
specifically to the north and south of the existing area 1 drill pattern, along with investigation and select 
drilling at the other three remaining anomalies on the property.  

During  2018  we  performed  site  work  at  the  Honeybugle  Scandium  property  to  meet  the  expenditure 
commitment  to  maintain  the  exploration  license.  Work  performed  during  2018  does  not  change  the 
previous conclusions, as described above. No work was required or performed during 2019 and 2020. 

Qualified Person and Quality Assurance/Quality Control 

John Thompson, B.E. (Mining); Vice President - Development at SCY is a qualified person as defined in 
NI 43-101 and has reviewed the technical information on this property. The drilling, sampling, packaging 
and  transport  of  the  drill  samples  was  carried  out  to  industry  standards  for  QA/QC.  SCY  employed  an 
independent local geology consulting and drill supervisory team, Rangott Mineral Exploration Pty. Ltd., 
(RME) of Orange, NSW, Australia, to manage the drill work on-site. Bulk samples of drill returns were 
collected at one metre intervals from a cyclone mounted on the drilling rig, and a separate three-tier riffle 
splitter was used on site to obtain 2.0-4.5kg composite samples collected over 3 metre intervals, for assay. 
Individual  sample  identifiers  were  cross-checked  during  the process.  The  assay  samples  were  placed  in 
sealed polyweave bags which remained in RME’s possession until the completion of the drilling program, 
at which time they were transported to RME’s office in Orange. There, the sequence of sample numbers 
was  validated,  and  the  assay  samples  were  immediately  submitted  to  Australian  Laboratory  Services’ 
(ALS’) laboratory in Orange. The remnant bulk samples, which were collected in sealed polythene bags, 
were transported by RME to a local storage unit at Orange, for long-term storage. 

ALS/Orange dried and weighed the samples, and pulverized the entire sample to 85% passing 75 microns 
or better (technique PUL-21). These 50g sample bags of pulps were then sent to the ALS laboratory at 
Stafford  in  Brisbane,  Queensland  for  analysis.  ALS/Brisbane  analyzed  the  pulps  for  scandium,  nickel, 
cobalt,  chromium,  iron  and  magnesium,  using  Inductively  Coupled  Plasma  Atomic  Emission 
Spectroscopy  (ICP-AES)  after  a  four  acid  (total)  digestion  (technique  ME-ICP61).  The  lower  detection 
limit for scandium using this technique is 1ppm. For their internal quality control, ALS/Brisbane added 4 
standard samples (for 20 repeat analyses), 10 blank samples and 16 duplicate samples to the batch. Please 
see  news  release  see  news  release  dated  May  7,  2014  and  available  on  www.sedar.com  for  further 
information on the Honeybugle drill results. 

Kiviniemi Scandium Property (Eastern Finland Province, Finland) 

On September 25, 2017 the Company announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary company, Scandium 
International  Mining  Corp.,  Norway  AS,  was  granted  a  reservation  on  an  Exploration  License  for  the 
Kiviniemi  Scandium  property  in  central  Finland  from  the  Finnish  regulatory  body  governing  mineral 
exploration  and  mining  in  Finland.  The  exploration  license  was  subsequently  granted  during  August 
2018,  and  our  exploration  rights  have  been  moved  to  SCY  Exploration  Finland  Oy,  a  wholly  owned 
Finnish subsidiary.  

34 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
The  Geological  Survey  of  Finland  (“GTK”)  conducted  airborne  survey  work  on  the  area  in  1986, 
conducted exploration drilling on the property in 2008-2010, and published those program results on their 
public GTK website in 2016. 

The Company does not consider the Kiviniemi Scandium property to be a material property at this time.  
No NI 43-101 resources or reserves are known to exist on the property. The property is classified as the 
Finland property for purposes of financial statement segment information. 

Highlights 

•  Kiviniemi property was previously identified for scandium and explored by GTK, 
•  Property is a high iron content, medium grade scandium target, located on surface, with on-site 

upgrade potential, 

•  Early resource upgrade work done for GTK promising, confirmed by SCY,  
•  Property is all-weather accessible, close to infrastructure, and 
•  Finland location is mining-friendly and ideally suited to EU customer markets. 

Property/Location  

The  Kiviniemi  property  is  located  in  the  municipality  of  Rautalampi,  Eastern  Finland  Province, 
approximately  350km  northeast  of  Helsinki,  by  road.  The  closest  major  city/airport  is  Kuopio  (pop. 
110,000),  approximately  70km  to  the  northeast  of  the  property.  The  exploration  target  is  located  on  a 
small portion of a family farm, partially cleared for farming. Most of the property is wooded, including 
the area where the mineralization has been located, 

Exploration License  

During August 2018, an exploration license for the Kiviniemi Scandium property was granted from the 
Finnish  regulatory  body  governing  mineral  exploration  and  mining  in  Finland.  The  exploration  area  is 
approximately 24.6 hectares (0.25 square kilometer), identical to the historic GTK exploration license on 
the property, which expired in 2015. The mineralized area, as defined on GTK resource modeling maps, 
is  approximately  25%  of  the  total  reservation.  The  exploration  license  requires  us  to  report  our 
exploration activities annually to Finland government agencies and to demonstrate in the annual reports 
that exploration work has been effective and systematic.   

Prior Exploration Work   

GTK performed  magnetic surveys on the general area in 1986,  focused  on copper/nickel/cobalt  targets, 
and  based  on  current  mining  activity  in  the  area.  That  initial  field  work  located  a  significant  magnetic 
anomaly  on  the  Kiviniemi  property.  In  2008,  GTK  initiated  an  exploration  drilling  program  on  the 
property, completing 4 diamond core holes in that first program phase, followed by a further 5 diamond 
holes in 2010, totaling 1,250 meters, at an average (angled) length of 139 meters, and a maximum vertical 
extension of 167 meters. The drill spacing varied from 50-200 meters, using a diamond drill size of 46mm 
(T56). 

Four of the nine total holes drilled (approx. 850 meters) are in the mineralized area, with the remainder 
defining portions of the mag zone that did not contain scandium. The mag zone is generally very high in 
iron, ranging from about 20% to 35% Fe. The GTK published the results of the drill program assays, and 
other information on the geology and mineralization, on their website in 2016.   

35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Geology of Resource Target   

The  host  rock  is  very  iron-rich,  garnet-bearing  fayalite  ferro(monzo)  diorite.  The  main  minerals  in  the 
deposit  include:  plagioclase,  potassium  feldspar,  ferrohedenbergite  (clinopyroxene),  ferrohastingsite 
(amphibole), almandine garnet and fayalite. The principal scandium carrier minerals are ferrohastingsite 
(59 %) and ferrohedenbergite (40 %). 

Resource Modeling   

GTK  completed  and  published  a  paper  outlining  property  work  including  a  3D  modeling  and  resource 
estimation on the project, in March 2016. The authors employed data from 6 holes, and used an industry 
standard GEOVIA Surpac software to produce a geological 3D domain model, and inverse distance was 
run to estimate resource grades into the block model. The authors declined to specifically characterize the 
resource  on  the  basis  of  limited  holes  and  uneven  spacing,  describing  their  estimate  as  an  “exploration 
potential measurement”. The authors estimated that another 500-700 meters of drilling (5-7 holes) would 
establish  50  meter  centers  on  the  target  and  allow  a  resource  classification.  The  mineralized  target 
remains  open  at  depth.  The  authors  did  provide  a  table  of  results  on  tonnage  estimates  from  their 
modeling work, at various cut off values, excerpts of which are presented below. 

      Kiviniemi Scandium Property - GTK Resource Potential Estimate

Estimated
Potential
Tonnage (Mt)

Sc Cut Off
Grade (ppm)

             Average Grade Estimate (ppm)

Scandium

Yttrium

Zirconium

12.6
12.5
11.1

60
100
150

170.1
170.9
173.3

80.5
80.3
80.2

1745
1744
1830

SOURCE:  Publication, GTK, "3D Modeling and Mineral Resource Estimation 
of the Kiviniemi Scandium Deposit, Eastern Finland".    Authors, Janne Hokka 
& Tapio Halkoaho

The  Company  believes  the  standards  and  controls  employed  by  GTK  are  reliable  and  consistent  with 
proper industry practice. However, the potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature and there has 
been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain whether further exploration 
will result in a mineral resource. The Company considers the above estimates as historical in nature, and 
such estimates do not use the categories prescribed by NI 43-101. A qualified person (as defined in NI 43-
101)  has  not  done  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  historical  estimate  as  a  current  mineral  resource.  The 
Company is not treating the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. 

Metallurgical Upgrade Work   

In  2010,  GTK  engaged  their  metallurgical  research  laboratory  (at  Outokumpu)  to  conduct  standard 
upgrade  testing  on  the  drill  core  sample  material,  specifically  magnetic  gravity  separations.  The  mag 
separation work suggested a scandium upgrade to approximately 346ppm, based on a resource material 
head grade of 160-200ppm, and a 72% scandium recovery.   

In  June  2017,  SCY  engaged  FLSmidth  (Salt  Lake  City,  Utah)  seeking  to  duplicate  the  earlier  2010 
upgrade  work  and  confirm  the  earlier  results.  The  earlier  results  were  generally  confirmed,  in  that  the 

36 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 work achieved magnetic separation upgrade assays of 286ppm on a resource material head grade of 
186ppm.  We  supplied  FLSmidth  with  approximately  16kg  of  resource  material  sourced  from  GTK,  all 
samples  from  a  single  hole  (P433-R3).  FLSmidth  also  carried  out  scandium  check  assays  on  the 
individual drill hole samples provided by GTK, with good grade correlation to GTK data. 

Kiviniemi Summary   

The  Kiviniemi  property  represents  a  medium  grade  scandium  resource  target  that  has  remained 
unrecognized  and  overlooked  by  earlier  exploration  work,  largely  due  to  the  absence  of  the  more 
commonly  sought-after  minerals  in  the  region,  specifically  copper,  nickel  and  cobalt.  We  believe  that 
Kiviniemi is Europe’s largest underdeveloped primary scandium mining resource.   

The  target  has  benefited  significantly  from  valuable  early  exploration  work  by  the  GTK,  which  has 
advanced  the  property  to  a  stage  where  successful  metallurgical  investigations  may  prove  value  that 
offsets grade concerns. SCY estimates roughly US$2M of work value has been directed at this property to 
date, including field work, drilling programs, assay work, overheads, and metallurgical upgrade studies, 
but firm numbers are not available. 

We plan a limited drill program to augment the existing GTK data, and provide more sample material for 
metallurgical  test  work  programs  to  define  economic  site  upgrade  possibilities  on  the  scandium 
mineralization observed to date. 

Critical Metals Recovery Technology Program 

On  May  13,  2020,  we  announced  our  pursuit  of  copper  industry  interest  in  our  ion  exchange  (IX) 
technology  and  knowhow  to  recover  scandium,  cobalt  and  other  critical  metals  from  solvent  extraction 
(SX) raffinate and other acidic waste streams in certain acid leach copper operations. 

Recovery  metals  targeted  by  this  application  include  cobalt,  copper,  nickel,  scandium,  and  zinc,  and 
possibly other metals and rare earth elements, depending on recovery economics. The suitability of this 
IX  technology,  and  the  target  metal  opportunities,  vary  with  the  specifics  of  individual  orebodies,  and 
associated SX plant characteristics. Depending on specific project variables, and the value and volume of 
critical metals recovered, the end result economics are expected to be significant to the parties involved.  

Concept Highlights 

IX technology offers rapid deployment to existing Cu operation waste streams, 

• 
•  Recoveries target critical metals with transparent, established markets, 
• 
•  Represents near term production sources that can address security of supply issues, conflict metal 

Includes potential for significant scandium production alongside other valuable products, 

issues, and concentrated supply source issues,  

•  Represents  a  project  focus  on  metals  prominent  in  the  US  Critical  Metals  priority  list,  and  on 

production from US and North American operation locations, and 

•  Promises  real  potential  to  deliver  positive  economic  benefits  to  both  SCY  and  the  established 

copper producers that can host this program. 

Program Discussion 

The  copper  industry  is  fully  aware  of  the  opportunity  to  harvest  valuable  metals  from  copper  process 
waste streams, and the industry does so with significant success today in precious metals. Most specialty 

37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
metals  recovery  work  has  historically  been  considered  un-economic,  based  on  effective  recovery  costs 
and recovered metals pricing. The technology in this area has advanced, improving both operating costs 
and recoveries. New, technology-driven uses for critical metals are stressing supply channels. Traditional 
jurisdiction  risk  concerns  are  now  multiplied  by  ethical  sourcing  issues,  and  long-term  sustainability 
questions, all of which elevate the interest in broader, more localized sourcing. These issues are receiving 
heightened  governmental  and  industry  priority,  and  metals  markets  customers  are  now  seeking  and 
favoring new, economic, responsible solutions. 

On the basis of this dynamic critical metals opportunity, and the fact that SCY has a significant capability 
to apply advanced mineral recovery technologies to the separation of critical metals from both ores and 
waste streams, the Company began a search for a North American copper industry host, in order to build a 
Critical  Metals  Recovery  (CMR)  Project.  This  effort  immediately  recognized  an  attractive  economic 
value from recovery of multiple metals, specifically metals used in lithium-ion battery manufacture, along 
with scandium, zinc and other metals present in source systems employing solvent extraction techniques.,  

The  potential  new  revenue  stream  of  the  combined  metals  residual  varies  by  orebody,  and  also  by  the 
specifics of the mineral processing systems in place, but collectively the metals basket is more instantly 
marketable and shows superior economics to the solo scandium target we had in mind at the start. This IX 
technology also represents a viable precursor for direct refining cobalt, nickel and potentially copper into 
high purity sulfate product forms, as required for battery manufacture, specifically in the electric vehicle 
(EV) industry. 

The  Company  has  filed  for  patent  protection  on  various  aspects  of  its  relevant  technical  program  ideas 
with the US Patent Office, using technical information from preliminary bench scale testing with actual 
copper SX raffinate solutions. The Company believes this work can be demonstrated with a working and 
successful  copper  plant  installation,  with  proven  knowhow,  and  intends  to  pursue  a  copper  industry 
partner  to  demonstrate  the  economic  viability  of  this  technology.  It  is  the  Company’s  intent  to  fully 
participate  in  the  operation,  ownership  and  production  economics  associated  with  a  plant  asset  that  is 
developed in concert with that partner. 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

We  are  not  a  party  to  any  pending  legal  proceedings  and,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge,  none  of  our 
properties or assets are the subject of any pending legal proceedings. 

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 

The  Company  has  no  active  mining  operations  or  dormant  mining  assets  at  this  time,  and  has  no 
outstanding mine safety violations or other regulatory safety matters to report.  

PART II 

ITEM  5.    MARKET  FOR  REGISTRANTS’  COMMON  EQUITY,  RELATED  STOCKHOLDER 
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

Price Range of Common Shares   

38 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  principal  market  on  which  our  common  shares  are  traded  is  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange.    Our 
common shares commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange on April 24, 2008 under the symbol 
“GP”.  Effective March 11, 2009, the common shares were listed and posted for trading on the Toronto 
Stock Exchange under the symbol “EMC”. Effective November 28, 2014, the common shares were listed 
and  posted  for  trading  on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange  under  the  symbol  “SCY”.  The  following  table 
shows  the  high  and  low  trading  prices  of  our  common  shares  on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange  for  the 
periods indicated.   

Year 

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2020 
First quarter 
Second quarter 
Third quarter 
Fourth quarter 
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2019 
First quarter 
Second quarter 
Third quarter 
Fourth quarter 

High 
(C$) 

0.095 
0.135 
0.135 
0.230 

0.220 
0.170 
0.190 
0.145 

Low 
(C$) 

0.060 
0.060 
0.110 
0.110 

0.145 
0.110 
0.095 
0.075 

Exchange Rates 

We maintain our books of account in United States dollars and references to dollar amounts herein are to 
the lawful currency of the United States except that we are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and, 
accordingly, stock price quotes and sales of stock are conducted in Canadian dollars (C$). The following 
table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain exchange rates based on the noon rate provided by the 
Bank of Canada. Such rates are the number of Canadian dollars per one (1) U.S. dollar (US$). The high 
and low exchange rates for each month during the previous six months were as follows: 

January 2021 
December 2020 
November 2020 
October 2020 
September 2020 
August 2020 

High 
1.2788 
1.2952 
1.3257 
1.3349 
1.3396 
1.3377 

Low 
1.2627 
1.2718 
1.2965 
1.3122 
1.3055 
1.3042 

The following table sets out the exchange rate (price of one U.S. dollar in Canadian dollars) information 
as at each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020.   

Rate at end of Period 
Low 
High 

Year Ended December 31 
(Canadian $ per U.S. $) 
2019 
2020 
1.2732 
1.2988 
1.2718 
1.2988 
1.3600 
1.4496 

39 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of February 25, 2021, there were 104 registered holders of record of the Company’s common shares 
and an undetermined number of beneficial holders.  

Dividends 

We  have  not  paid  any  cash  dividends  on  our  common  shares  since  our  inception  and  do  not  anticipate 
paying  any  cash  dividends  in  the  foreseeable  future. We  plan  to  retain  our  earnings,  if  any,  to  provide 
funds for the expansion of our business. 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Compensation Plans 

The  following  table  sets  forth  information  as  at  December  31,  2020  respecting  the  compensation  plans 
under which shares of the Company’s common stock are authorized to be issued. 

Number of securities 
to be issued upon 
exercise of outstanding 
options, warrants and 
rights 

Weighted-average 
exercise price of 
outstanding options, 
warrants and rights 

(b) 

(a) 

35,100,000 

C$0.170 

Number of securities 
remaining available 
for future issuance 
under equity 
compensation plans 
(excluding securities 
reflected in column 
(a)) 

(c) 
12,004,889 

Nil 

Nil 

Nil 

35,100,000 

C$0.170 

12,004,889 

Plan Category 

Equity compensation 
plans approved by 
security holders 
Equity compensation 
plans not approved by 
security holders 
Total 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company and Affiliated Purchasers 

Neither  the  Company  nor  an  affiliated  purchaser  of  the  Company  purchased  common  shares  of  the 
Company in the year ended December 31, 2020.  

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

Overview  

The Company is a specialty metals and alloys company focusing on scandium and other specialty metals.  

40 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  Company  was  incorporated  under  the  laws  of  the  Province  of  British  Columbia,  Canada  in  2006.  
The Company currently trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “SCY”.  

The  Company’s  focus  is  on  the  exploration,  evaluation  and  future  development  of  its  specialty  metals 
assets,  specifically  the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  and  Honeybugle  Scandium  property  located  in  New 
South Wales, Australia and the Kiviniemi scandium prospect in Finland, all of which are 100% owned by 
SCY.   The Company is also actively seeking an appropriate copper mine owner to host an ion-exchange 
metals recovery project, designed to harvest select metals including scandium from recirculating process 
solutions.  The Company is an exploration stage company and anticipates incurring significant additional 
expenditures prior to production at any and all of its properties. 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis that contemplates 
the  realization  of  assets  and  discharge  of  liabilities  at  their  carrying  values  in  the  normal  course  of 
business for the foreseeable future. These financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that may be 
necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. 

The Company currently earns no operating revenues and will require additional capital to advance both 
the  Nyngan  Scandium  Project  and  the  Honeybugle  property.  The  Company’s  ability  to  continue  as  a 
going  concern  is  uncertain  and  is  dependent  upon  the  generation  of  profits  from  mineral  properties, 
obtaining  additional  financing  and  maintaining  continued  support  from  its  shareholders  and  creditors. 
These are material uncertainties that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a 
going  concern.  If  additional  financial  support  is  not  received  or operating  profits  are  not  generated,  the 
carrying values of the Company’s assets may be adversely affected. 

RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 

Liquidity and Capital Resources  

At  December  31,  2020,  we  had  working  capital  of  $(951,674)  including  cash  of  $170,284  and  current 
liabilities  of  $1,154,388  as  compared  to  working  capital  of  $(376,893)  including  cash  of  $115,568  at 
December 31, 2019.   

At  December  31,  2020,  we  had  a  total  of  35,100,000  (2019  –  34,610,000)  stock  options  exercisable 
between  C$0.065  and  C$0.37  (2019  –  between  C$0.10  and  C$0.60)  which  have  the  potential  upon 
exercise to generate a total of C$5,962,625 (2018 – C$6,513,250) in cash over the next four and a half 
years. There is no assurance that these securities will be exercised.  

Our continued development is contingent upon our ability to raise sufficient financing both in the short 
and  long  term.  There  are  no  guarantees  that  additional  sources  of  funding  will  be  available  to  us; 
however, management is committed to pursuing all possible sources of financing to execute our business 
plan. 

Our  major  capital  requirement  in  the  next  12  months  relates  to  the  start  of  construction  on  the  Nyngan 
Scandium Project and our entry into a critical metals recovery program. 

The Company will need additional funding to develop the Nyngan project into a mine in 2022 and will 
seek to raise additional equity financing at that time.       

Results of Operations 

41 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter ended December 31, 2020 

The net loss for the quarter increased by $394,499 to $706,306 from a loss of $311,807 in the prior year 
mainly  as  a  result  of  increased  stock-based  compensation  costs  which  is  partially  offset  by  lower 
consulting fees. Details of the individual items contributing to the decreased loss are as follows:  

Q4 2020 vs. Q4 2019 - Variance Analysis (US$) 

Item 

Stock based 
compensation 

Variance 
Favourable / 
(Unfavourable) 
($422,026) 

Foreign exchange 
loss 

($18,946) 

Explanation 
In Q4 of 2020 the Company granted 5,900,000 stock options 
all of which vested immediately. In the comparative quarter 
of  2019,  no  options  grant  was  made,  and  the  only  expense 
was  the  amortization  of  certain  options  that  had  a  two-year 
vesting period. 

In  Q4  2020  the  US  dollar  weakened  against  both  the 
Canadian  and  Australian  dollar.  This  meant  that  for  any 
accounts  payable  held  in  Canadian  and  Australian  dollars 
those  liabilities  increased.  Such  was  not  the  case  in  the 
comparative quarter of one year ago.  

General and 
administrative 

($17,371) 

The  Q4  2020  expense  is  higher  than  in  Q4  2019  due  to 
higher property tax expense at our Nyngan project. 

Exploration 

($6,387) 

The Company spent funds on procuring aluminum/scandium 
alloys  at  a  higher  cost  when  compared  to  the  comparative 
quarter of 2019. 

Professional fees 

($3,497) 

The  higher  cost  in  Q4  2020  is  due  to  a  general  increase  in 
fees for tax return filings and financial statement review. 

Salaries and benefits 

($2,168) 

The  slightly  higher  cost  in  Q4  2020  is  due  to  the 
strengthening  of  the  Australian  dollar  and  against  the  US 
dollar. 

Insurance 

($631) 

Travel 

$11,869 

Consulting 

$64,661 

insurance  premiums 

Higher 
the  Company  when 
compared  to  one  year  ago  results  in  this  minor  negative 
variance. 

for 

The  Company  has  curtailed  travel  due  to  the  Corona  virus 
pandemic in 2020 resulting in the much lower expenditure in 
the comparative periods. 

The  Company  released  several  contractors  who  were  no 
longer  required,  resulting  in  this  positive  variance  in  the 
current 3-month period. 

42 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2020  

The net loss for the year decreased by $560,097 to $1,378,840 from $1,947,934 in the prior year, mainly 
because of a one-time royalty sale and lower consulting and general and administrative costs. Details of 
the individual items contributing to the decreased net loss are as follows:  

2020 vs. 2019 - Variance Analysis (US$) 

Item 

Sale of royalty 
interest 

Variance 
Favourable / 
(Unfavourable) 
$382,430 

Consulting 

$259,177 

General and 
administrative 

Travel 

$91,879 

$66,689 

Explanation 
In  January  of  2020,  the  Company  sold  a  royalty  interest  for 
net proceeds of $382,430. This was a non-recurring event. 

The  Company  released  several  contractors  who  were  no 
longer  required,  resulting  in  this  positive  variance  in  the 
current year. 

The  decrease  in  this  expense  is  due  to  the  downturn  of 
activity in 2020 compared to 2019. 

Less  travel  in  2020  was  due  to  an  overall  decrease  in 
Company  activities  when  compared  to  2019.  Also,  in  Q3 
2019, the Company did extensive travel in Europe. 

Exploration 

$38,721 

With  the  Company  in  a  conservation  of  cash  mode  in  2020, 
less funds were expended on this activity. 

Professional fees 

$10,024 

Lower  2020  activity  levels  resulted  in  the  favourable 
variance. 

Insurance 

($1,841) 

The slightly higher cost in 2020 is due to overall increases in 
insurance premiums for the Company’s operations. 

Salaries and 
benefits 

Foreign exchange 
loss 

($2,759) 

($31,302) 

Stock-based 
compensation 

($252,922) 

The slightly higher cost in 2020 is due to the strengthening of 
the Australian dollar and against the US dollar. 

In  2020  the  US  dollar  weakened  against  both  the  Canadian 
and  Australian  dollar.  This  meant  that  for  any  accounts 
payable  held  in  Canadian  and  Australian  dollars  those 
liabilities increased.  Such was not the case one year ago.  

In  2020  the  Company  granted  14,425,000  stock  options 
compared  to  9,860,000  stock  options  issued  in  2019.  
However,  more  immediate  vesting  provisions  resulted  in  a 
higher expense in 2020.   

43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flow discussion for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019  

The cash outflow from operating activities decreased by $1,211,649 to $81,981 (2019 – $1,129,668) due 
mainly to the sale of a royalty interest, increased accounts payable and overall lower operating costs. 

Cash  inflows  from  financing  activities  of  $136,697  reflect  no  private  placements  in  the  year  when 
compared with private placements of $799,484 in 2019. Cash inflows from exercises of stock options of 
$136,697 were lower than $160,995 for the year ending December 31, 2019. 

Summary of quarterly results (US$) 

Q4 

- 

2019 

Q3 

- 

Q2 

- 

Q1 

- 

Q4 

- 

2019 

Q3 

- 

Q2 

- 

Q1 

- 

(706,306) 

(265,057) 

(270,463) 

(146,014) 

(311,807) 

(443,426) 

(859,934) 

(332,766) 

(0.00) 

(0.00) 

(0.00) 

(0.00) 

(0.00) 

(0.00) 

(0.01) 

(0.00) 

Net Sales 

Net Income 
(Loss) 
Basic and 
diluted 
Net Income 
(Loss) per 
share 

Financial Position 

Cash   

The increase in cash of $54,716 to $170,284 (2019 - $115,568) results from lower operations spending. 

Prepaid expenses and receivables 

Prepaid  expenses  and  receivables  have  decreased  by  $3,333  to  $42,430  (2019  -  $45,763)  due  to  lower 
activity levels in 2020. 

Reclamation bond 

A reclamation bond of $11,444 was purchased for the Kiviniemi property in 2018. 

Property, plant and equipment 

Property plant and equipment consists of office furniture and computer equipment at the Sparks, Nevada 
office.  The decrease of $2,307 to $4,660 at December 31, 2020 (2019 - $6,967) is due to depreciation of 
computer servers at the Sparks office. 

Mineral interests 

Mineral interests remained at $704,053 at December 31, 2019 (2018 - $704,053). 

Accounts Payable, Accounts payable with related parties and Accrued Liabilities 

44 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts  payable,  accounts  payable  with  related  parties  and  accrued  liabilities  have  increased  by 
$616,164to  $1,154,388  at  December  31,  2020  (2019  –  $538,224)  due  to  the  deferral  of  consulting  fees 
and salaries. 

Capital Stock 

Capital  stock  increased  by  $251,410  to  $109,627,071  (2019  -  $109,375,661)  due  to  stock  option 
exercises. 

Additional paid-in capital decreased by $569,342 to $6,505,416 (2019 - $5,936,074) as a result of stock 
option expensing which was partially offset by stock option exercises. 

Treasury shares remained at $1,264,194 through the 2020 fiscal period. 

Off-balance sheet arrangements 

At December 31, 2020, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements such as guarantee contracts, 
contingent interest in assets transferred to an entity, derivative instruments obligations or any obligations 
that trigger financing, liquidity, market or credit risk to us.   

Transactions with related parties 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2020,  the  Company  expensed  $542,722  for  stock-based 
compensation for stock options issued to Company directors. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 
the Company expensed $314,104 for stock options issued to Company directors. 

During  each  of  the  years  ended  December  31,  2020  and  December  31,  2019  the  Company  paid  a 
consulting fee of $102,000 to one of its directors.  

As at December 31, 2020, the Company owed $702,456 (2019 - $269,165) to officers of the Company. 

Additional Information and Accounting Pronouncements 

Outstanding share data 

At  February  25,  2021  we  had  316,172,595  issued  and  outstanding  common  shares  and  30,925,000 
outstanding stock options at a weighted average exercise price of C$0.175. No warrants are outstanding at 
February 25, 2021. 

Critical Accounting Estimates 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  policies 
requires  our management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets 
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses 
during  the  reporting  period.  These  estimates  are  based  on  past  experience,  industry  trends  and  known 
commitments and events.  By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and the 
effects  on  the  financial  statements  of  changes  in  such  estimates  in  future  periods  could  be  significant. 
Actual results will likely differ from those estimates. 

Stock-based compensation  

45 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We  use  the  Black-Scholes  option  pricing  model  to  calculate  the  fair  value  of  stock  options  and 
compensatory warrants granted. This model is subject to various assumptions. The assumptions we make 
will likely change from time to time. At the time the fair value is determined, the methodology that we 
use  is  based  on  historical  information,  as  well  as  anticipated  future  events.  The  assumptions  with  the 
greatest  impact  on  fair  value  are  those  for  estimated  stock  volatility  and  for  the  expected  life  of  the 
instrument.  

Deferred income taxes  

We account for tax consequences of the differences in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and 
our  tax  bases  using  tax  rates  expected  to  apply  when  these  temporary  differences  are  expected  to  be 
settled.  When  the  deferred  realization  of  income  tax  assets  does  not  meet  the  test  of  being  more  likely 
than  not  to  occur,  a  valuation  allowance  in  the  amount  of  the  potential  future  benefit  is  taken  and  no 
future income tax asset is recognized. We have taken a valuation allowance against all such potential tax 
assets. 

Mineral properties and exploration and development costs 

We  capitalise  the  costs  of  acquiring  mineral  rights  at  the  date  of  acquisition.  After  acquisition,  various 
factors can affect the recoverability of the capitalized costs. Our recoverability evaluation of our mineral 
properties  and  equipment  is  based  on  market  conditions  for  minerals,  underlying  mineral  resources 
associated with the assets and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining 
operations  or  by  sale.  We  are  in  an  industry  that  is  exposed  to  a  number  of  risks  and  uncertainties, 
including  exploration  risk,  development  risk,  commodity  price  risk,  operating  risk,  ownership  and 
political risk, funding and currency risk, as well as environmental risk. Bearing these risks in mind, we 
have  assumed  recent  world  commodity  prices  will  be  achievable.  We  have  considered  the  mineral 
resource reports by independent engineers on the Nyngan project in considering the recoverability of the 
carrying costs of the mineral properties. All of these assumptions are potentially subject to change, out of 
our control, however such changes are not determinable. Accordingly, there is always the potential for a 
material adjustment to the value assigned to mineral properties and equipment. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements  

Accounting Standards Update 2019-12 – Income Taxes (Topic 740) The Financial Accounting Standards 
Board  (“Board”)  is  issuing  this  Update  as  part  of  its  initiative  to  reduce  complexity  in  accounting 
standards. This standard is effective for interim and  annual reporting periods beginning after December 
15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance 
will have on its financial statements. 

Accounting  Standards  Update  2019-01  –  Leases  (Topic  842)  Codification  Improvements  -  Issue  3 
Transition  Disclosures  Related  to  Topic  250,  Accounting  Changes  and  Error  Corrections.  The 
amendments in this Update clarify the Board’s original intent by explicitly providing an exception to the 
paragraph  250-10-50-3  interim  disclosure  requirements  in  the  Topic  842  transition  disclosure 
requirements.  The  effective  date  is  for  fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15,  2020,  and  interim 
periods  within  fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15,  2020.  The  Company  has  evaluated  that  this 
guidance will have little or no impact on its financial statements. 

Financial instruments and other risks 

46 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our financial instruments consist of cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accounts 
payable  with  related  parties,  and  promissory  notes  payable.  It  is  management's  opinion  that  we  are  not 
exposed  to  significant  interest,  currency  or  credit  risks  arising  from  our  financial  instruments.  The  fair 
values  of  these  financial  instruments  approximate  their  carrying  values  unless  otherwise  noted.  The 
Company has its cash primarily in two commercial banks, one in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
and in one in Chicago, Illinois. 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto are attached to this report 
following the signature page and Certifications. 

ITEM  9.    CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING 
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

For  the  fiscal  years  ended  December  31,  2020  and  2019  we  did  not  have  any  disagreement  with  our 
accountants on any matter of accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure. 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Disclosure controls and procedures 

The Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, 
evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-
15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive 
officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the 
Company has maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures in all material respects, including 
those necessary to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted with the 
SEC  (i)  is  recorded,  processed,  and  reported  within  the  time  periods  specified  by  the  sec,  and  (ii)  is 
accumulated  and  communicated  to  management,  including  the  principal  executive  officer  and  principal 
financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decision regarding required disclosure. 

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting 

The  Company’s  management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  internal  control 
over  financial  reporting  (as  defined  in  Rule  13a-15(f)  or  15d-15(f)  of  the  Exchange  Act).  Management 
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, using 
criteria  established  in  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  issued  in  1992  by  the  Committee  of 
Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (COSO).  Even  an  effective  internal  control 
system, no  matter how well designed,  has inherent  limitations, including the possibility of human error 
and  circumvention  or  overriding  of  controls  and  therefore  can  provide  only  reasonable  assurance  with 
respect  to  reliable  financial  reporting.  Furthermore,  the  effectiveness  of  an  internal  control  system  in 
future periods can change with conditions. 

47 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A  material  weakness  is  a  deficiency,  or  combination  of  deficiencies,  in  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual 
or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. 

The  Company’s  management  has  determined  that  the  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  are 
effective as of December 31, 2020.  

Changes in Internal Control 

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal 
quarter  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  internal  control  over 
financial reporting. 

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION 

None. 

PART III 

Information with respect to Items 10 through 14 is set forth in the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2020 and is incorporated herein by 
reference.   If the definitive Proxy Statement  cannot be  filed on or before April 30, 2020, the Company 
will  instead  file  an  amendment  to  this  Form  10-K  disclosing  the  information  with  respect  to  Items  10 
through 14.  

PART IV 

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES 

Financial Statements 

The following Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this report. 

Description 
Financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 
audit reports thereon. 

Page 
F-1 

Exhibits  

The following table sets out the exhibits filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference. 

Exhibit 
3.1 

3.2 

Description 
Certificate of Incorporation, Certificate of Name Change dated March 2009, Notice of 
Articles dated March 2009(1) 
Certificate of Name Change dated November 19, 2014 and Notice of Articles dated 
November 19, 2014(2) 
Corporate Articles(1) 
Amendment to Corporate Articles dated November 10, 2014(2) 

48 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.1(3) 
10.2(1) 
10.3(4) 
10.4(5) 
21.1(7) 
23.1(7) 
23.2(7) 
23.3(7) 
23.4(7) 
31.1(7) 

31.2(7) 

32.1(7) 

32.2(7) 

2015 Stock Option Plan 
Management Contract with George Putnam dated May 1, 2010 
Management Contract with Edward Dickinson dated August 13, 2011 
Share Exchange Agreement dated June 30, 2017 
List of Subsidiaries 

Consent of Davidson & Company LLP 
Consent of Stuart Hutchin 
Consent of Dean Basile 
Consent of Geoffrey Duckworth 
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 of the Principal Executive Officer 
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 of the Principal Financial Officer 
Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial 
Officer of the Principal Executive Officer 
Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial 
Officer of the Principal Financial Officer 

(1) Previously filed as exhibits to the Form 10 filed May 24, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference. 
(2) Previously filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K filed February 27, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference. 
(3)  Previously  filed  as  Schedule  “A”  to  the  Form  DEF  14A  filed  October  5,  2015  and  incorporated  herein  by 
reference. 
(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K/A filed May 1, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference. 
 (5) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed July 26, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. 
(7) Filed herewith. 

49 

 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant 
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

SIGNATURES 

SCANDIUM INTERNATIONAL MINING CORP. 

By: /s/ George Putnam 
  George Putnam 

President and Principal Executive Officer 

Date:     February 25, 2021 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by 
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

Signature 

Title 

Date 

 /s/ George Putnam 
George Putnam 

 /s/ William Harris 
William Harris 

President, Principal Executive Officer, and Director  February 25, 2021 

Chairman and Director 

February 25, 2021 

/s/ James Rothwell 
James Rothwell 

Director 

 /s/ Willem Duyvesteyn  Director 
Willem Duyvesteyn 

 /s/ Warren Davis 
Warren Davis  

Director 

/s/ Peter Evensen 
Peter Evensen 

Director 

/s/ R.Christian Evensen  Director 
R. Christian Evensen 

 February 25, 2021 

 February 25, 2021 

 February 25, 2021 

 February 25, 2021 

 February 25, 2021 

50 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                
                                                                         
 
                           
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Edward Dickinson 
Edward Dickinson 

Principal Accounting Officer and  
Principal Financial Officer 

 February 25, 2021 

51