Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Entertainment / Sinclair, Inc. / FY2012 Annual Report

Sinclair, Inc.
Annual Report 2012

SBGI · NASDAQ Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker SBGI
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Communication Services
Industry Entertainment
Employees 7200
← All annual reports
FY2012 Annual Report · Sinclair, Inc.
Loading PDF…
(This page intentionally left blank)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Television Broadcasting ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 

Forward-Looking Statements .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 

Selected Financial Data ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 

Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations ................................................................. 9 

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ....................................................................................................................... 26 

Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities ........................ 26 

Controls And Procedures ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Consolidated Balance Sheets ................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 

Consolidated Statements Of Operations ............................................................................................................................................................ 31 

Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income ..................................................................................................................................... 32 

Consolidated Statements Of Equity (Deficit) .................................................................................................................................................... 33 

Notes To The Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................................ 37 

Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: ........................................................................................................................ 81 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TELEVISION BROADCASTING 

As of December 31, 2012, we own and operate, provide programming services to, provide sales services to or have agreed to 

acquire the following television stations: 

Market 
Rank (a) 
14 

Stations 
WTTA 

Channel 
Primary 

Status (b) 
O&O 

Network/  
Program Service 
Arrangement (c) 
MNT 

Station Rank 
in Market (d) 
8 of 9 

Expiration 
Date of FCC 
License 
2/01/13 (f) 

Market 

Tampa/St. Petersburg, 

Florida 

Minneapolis/St. Paul, 

Minnesota 

St. Louis, Missouri 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

Raleigh/Durham, North 
  Carolina 

Baltimore, Maryland 

Nashville, Tennessee 

Columbus, Ohio 

15 

21 

23 

24 

27 

29 

32 

Salt Lake City/St. George, 

33 

Utah 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

San Antonio, Texas 

Asheville, North Carolina/ 
  Greenville/Spartanburg/ 
  Anderson, South 

Carolina 

West Palm Beach/Fort 

Pierce, Florida 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo, 
    Michigan 
Las Vegas, Nevada 

39 

40 

2  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

WUCW 
WUCW 
KDNL 
KDNL 
WPGH 
WPMY 
WPGH 
WLFL 
WRDC 
WLFL  
WBFF 
WNUV 
WBFF  
WBFF 
WZTV 
WUXP 
WNAB 
WNAB  
WSYX 
WTTE 
WWHO 
WSYX 
KUTV 
KMYU 
KUTV 
KMYU 
WVTV 
WCGV 
WCGV  
WKRC 
WSTR 
WKRC 
WOAI 
KABB 
KMYS 
KABB  
WOAI 
WLOS 
WMYA 
WLOS  
WMYA  
WPEC 
WTVX 
WTCN 
WWHB 
WPEC 
WPEC 
WTVX 
WTVX 
WTVX 
WWMT 
WWMT 
KVMY 
KVCW 
KVMY  
KVCW  
KVCW  

Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Third 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Third 
Second 
Third 
Fourth 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Third 

O&O 

O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
LMA(g) 

O&O 
O&O 
OSA(h) 

O&O 
LMA(g) 
OSA(k) 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
OSA(q) 

O&O 
O&O 
OSA(q) 

O&O 
LMA(g) 

O&O 
O&O 
O&O 
O&O 

O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

CW 
The Country Network  
ABC 
The Country Network 
FOX 
MNT 
The Country Network 
CW 
MNT 
The Country Network 
FOX 
CW 
This TV 
The Country Network 
FOX 
MNT 
CW 
The Country Network 
ABC 
FOX 
CW 
This TV and MNT 
CBS 
This TV and MNT 
This TV and MNT 
CBS(p) 
CW 
MNT 
The Country Network 
CBS 
MNT 
CW 
NBC 
FOX 
CW  
The Country Network 
Live Well Network 
ABC 
MNT 
MNT 
The Country Network 
CBS 
CW 
MNT 
AZTECA(t) 
CBS(p)  
Weather Radar 
AZTECA(p) 
MNT(p) 
LATV 
CBS 
CW 
MNT 
CW 
Estella TV 
This TV 
The Country Network 

6 of 7 

4 of 7 

4 of 6 
6 of 6 

5 of 7 
6 of 7 

3 of 6 
5 of 6 

4 of 7 
5 of 7 
6 of 7 

3 of 6 
4 of 6 
5 of 6 

1 of 7 
5 of 7 

6 of 9 
7 of 9 

1 of 7 
5 of 7 
6 of 7 
3 of 7 
4 of 7 
5 of 7 

3 of 6 
5 of 6 

4/01/14 

2/01/14 

8/01/15 
8/01/15 

12/01/04 (e) 
12/01/04 (e) 

10/01/04 (e) 
10/01/12 (f) 

8/01/13 
8/01/13 
8/01/13 

10/01/13 
10/01/05 (e) 
10/01/13 

10/01/14 
10/01/14 

12/01/13 
12/01/05 (e) 

10/01/13 
10/01/13 

8/01/14 
8/01/14 
8/01/14 

12/01/04 (e) 
12/01/04 (e) 

2 of 6 
5 of 6 
6 of 6 
not available 

2/01/13 (f) 
2/01/13 (f) 
2/01/13 (f) 
2/01/13 (f) 

1 of 6 

5 of 7 
6 of 7 

10/01/13 

10/01/14 
10/01/14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 

Market 
Rank (a) 
41 

Birmingham, Alabama 

42 

Harrisburg/Lancaster/ 
Lebanon/York, 
Pennsylvania 

Norfolk, Virginia 

Austin, Texas 

Greensboro/Winston- 
    Salem/Highpoint, North 
    Carolina 
Buffalo, New York 

43 

44 

45 

46 

52 

Providence, Rhode Island/ 

53 

New Bedford, 
Massachusetts 
Richmond, Virginia 

Albany, New York 

Mobile, Alabama/  
    Pensacola, Florida 

Dayton, Ohio 

Lexington, Kentucky 
Charleston/Huntington, 

West Virginia 

Wichita/Hutchinson Plus, 

Kansas 

Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, 

Michigan 

Des Moines, Iowa 

Rochester, New York 

Portland, Maine 
Cape Girardeau, Missouri/ 
  Paducah, Kentucky 

57 

58 

60 

63 

64 
65 

66 

67 

72 

78 

80 
81 

Stations 
KOKH 
KOCB 
KOKH 
WTTO 
WABM 
WDBB 
WTTO  
WDBB  
WHP 
WLYH 
WHP 
WLYH 
WTVZ 
WTVZ 
KEYE 
KEYE 
WXLV 
WMYV 
WXLV 
WUTV 
WNYO 
WUTV 
WLWC 
WLWC 

Channel 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 

Status (b) 
O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
O&O 
LMA(g) 

O&O 
LMA(r) 

O&O 

O&O  

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 

WRLH 
WRLH 
WRGB 
WCWN 
WRGB 
WCWN 
WEAR 
WPMI 
WJTC 
WFGX 
WEAR 
WPMI 

Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Pensacola, Florida    
Primary 
Pensacola, Florida 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 

O&O 

O&O 
O&O 

O&O 
OSA(q) 
OSA(q) 
O&O 

WKEF 
WRGT 
WRGT  
WDKY 
WCHS 
WVAH 
WVAH  
KSAS (o) 
KMTW 
KSAS (o) 
KMTW 
WSMH 
WSMH 
KDSM 
KDSM 
WUHF 
WHAM 
WHAM 
WGME 
KBSI 
WDKA 
KBSI  
WDKA 

Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 

O&O 
LMA(g) 

O&O 
O&O 
LMA(g) 

O&O 
LMA(r) 

O&O 

O&O 

O&O(i) 
OSA(s) 

O&O 
O&O 
LMA 

Network/  
Program Service 
Arrangement (c) 
FOX 
CW 
The Country Network 
CW 
MNT 
CW 
The Country Network 
The Country Network 
CBS 
CW 
MNT 
Live Well Network 
MNT 
The Country Network  
CBS 
Telemundo 
ABC 
MNT 
The Country Network 
FOX 
MNT 
The Country Network 
CW 
LATV 

FOX 
This TV and MNT 
CBS 
CW 
This TV 
CBS(p) 
ABC 
NBC 
IND 
This TV and MNT 
The Country Network 
The Weather Authority 
Network 
ABC 
FOX 
This TV and MNT 
FOX 
ABC 
FOX 
The Country Network 
FOX 
MNT 
Antenna TV 
The Country Network 
FOX 
The Country Network 
FOX 
The Country Network 
FOX 
ABC 
CW 
CBS 
FOX 
MNT 
MNT 
The Country Network 

Station Rank 
in Market (d) 
4 of 7 
5 of 7 

Expiration 
Date of FCC 
License 
6/01/14 
6/01/14 

5 of 8 
6 of 8 
     5 of 8 (l) 

4/01/05 (e) 
4/01/13 
4/01/13 

3 of 8 
5 of 8 

6 of 7 

3 of 6 

4 of 6 
5 of 6 

4 of 6 
6 of 6 

5 of 7 

4 of 6 

1 of 6 
5 of 6 

2 of 7 
4 of 7 
5 of 7 
7 of 7 

3 of 5 
4 of 5 

4 of 6 
2 of 6 
4 of 6 

4 of 6 
6 of 6 

3 of 6 

4 of 6 

not available 
not available 

2 of 6 
4 of 6 
5 of 6 

8/01/15 
8/01/07(e) 

10/01/12 (f) 

8/01/14 

12/01/04 (e) 
12/01/04 (e) 

6/01/15 
6/01/15 

4/01/15 

10/01/12 (f) 

6/01/15 
6/01/15 

2/01/13 (f) 
4/01/13 
2/01/13 (f) 
2/01/13 (f) 

10/01/13 
10/01/05 (e) 

8/01/13 
10/01/12 (f) 
10/01/04 (e) 

6/01/14 
6/01/14 

10/01/13 

2/01/14 

6/01/15 
6/01/15 

4/01/15 
2/01/14 
8/01/13 

2012 Annual Report  3  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market 

Springfield/Champaign/ 

Decatur, Illinois 

Market 
Rank (a) 
83 

Syracuse, New York 

Madison, Wisconsin 

Chattanooga, Tennessee 

Cedar Rapids, Iowa 

84 

85 

87 

90 

Charleston, South Carolina 

98 

Tallahassee, Florida 

Lansing, Michigan 

Peoria/Bloomington, 

Illinois 

Medford, Oregon 

Beaumont, Texas 

106 

115 

116 

140 

141 

Stations 
WICS 
WICD 
WRSP 
WBUI 
WCCU 
WICS 
WRSP 
WCCU 
WBUI 
WSYT 
WNYS 
WSYT  
WMSN 
WMSN  
WTVC 
WTVC 
KGAN 
KFXA 
KFXA  
WTAT 
WMMP 
WMMP 
WTWC 
WTWC 
WLAJ 
WLAJ 
WYZZ 
WYZZ 
KTVL 
KTVL 
KFDM 
KBTV 
KFDM 
KBTV 

Status (b) 
O&O 
O&O 
OSA 
OSA 
OSA 

O&O 
LMA 

O&O 

O&O 

O&O 
OSA(j) 

LMA(g) 
O&O 

O&O 

O&O(u) 

O&O(i) 

O&O 

O&O 
OSA(q) 

Channel 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 
Second 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Second 
Primary 
Primary 
Second 
Second 

Network/  
Program Service 
Arrangement (c) 
ABC 
ABC 
FOX 
CW 
FOX 
The Country Network 
ME TV 
ME TV 
This TV 
FOX 
MNT 
The Country Network 
FOX 
The Country Network  
ABC 
This TV 
CBS 
FOX 
The Country Network 
FOX 
MNT 
The Country Network 
NBC 
The Country Network  
ABC 
CW 
FOX 
The Country Network  
CBS 
CW 
CBS 
FOX 
CW 
Bounce Network 

Station Rank 
in Market (d) 
3 of 6 
       3 of 6 (m)  
4 of 6 
5 of 6 
     4 of 6 (n) 

Expiration 
Date of FCC 
License 
12/01/05 (e) 
12/01/13 
12/01/13 
12/01/13 
12/01/13 

4 of 6 
5 of 6 

4 of 6 

1 of 6 

3 of 4 
4 of 4 

4 of 6 
5 of 6 

3 of 6 

4 of 6 

6/01/15 
6/01/15 

12/01/13 

8/01/13 

2/01/06 (e) 
2/01/14 

12/01/04 (e) 
12/01/04 (e) 

2/01/13 (f) 

10/01/13 

not available 

12/01/13 

2 of 6 

1 of 6 
3 of 6 

2/01/15 

8/01/14 
8/01/06 (e) 

(a)  Rankings are based on the relative size of a station’s DMA among the 210 generally recognized DMAs in the United States as estimated by 

Nielsen as of September 2012.   

(b)  “O & O” refers to stations that we own and operate.  “LMA” refers to stations to which we provide programming services pursuant to a 

local marketing agreement.  “OSA” refers to stations to which we provide or receive sales services pursuant to an outsourcing agreement. 

(c)  When we negotiate the terms of  our  network affiliations or program service arrangements, we negotiate on behalf of all of our stations 
affiliated with that  entity simultaneously.  This results in substantially similar terms for our stations, including the expiration date of the 
network affiliations or program service arrangements.  A summary of these expiration dates for our primary channels as of December 31, 
2012 is as follows: 

Network/ 
Program Service 
Arrangement 
FOX 

MNT 
ABC 

CW 
CBS 

NBC 

Azteca 

Expiration Date 
Of the 24 agreements, 22 agreements expire on December 31, 2017 and 
2 expire on June 30, 2014 
All 19 agreements expire in the Fall of 2014 
Of  the  12  agreements,  9  agreements  expire  on  August  31,  2015,  2 
agreements  expire  on  December  31,  2015  and  1  agreement  expires  on 
December 31, 2017   
All 16 agreements expire on August 31, 2016 
Of  the  11  agreements,  4  agreements  expire  on  January  31,  2016,  2 
agreements  expire  on  June  2,  2016,  1  agreement  expires  December  31, 
2016, 2 agreements expire on April 29, 2017 and 2 agreements expire on 
December 31, 2018 
Of  the  3  agreements,  2  expire  on  January  1,  2016  and  1  expires  on 
January 1, 2017 
Agreement expired on February 8, 2013 (t) 

(d)  The  first  number  represents  the  rank  of  each  station  in  its  market  and  is  based  upon  the  November  2012  Nielsen  estimates  of  the 
percentage of persons tuned into each station in the market from  6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., Monday through Sunday.  The second number 

4  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
represents the estimated number of television stations designated by Nielsen as “local” to the DMA, excluding public television stations 
and  stations  that  do  not  meet  the  minimum  Nielsen  reporting  standards  (weekly  cumulative  audience  of  at  least  0.1%)  for  the  Monday 
through  Sunday  6:00  a.m.  to  2:00  a.m.  time  period  as  of  November  2012.    This  information  is  provided  to  us  in  a  summary  report  by 
Franco Research Group. 

(e)  We, or subsidiaries of Cunningham Broadcasting Company (Cunningham), timely filed applications for renewal of these licenses  with the 
FCC.  Unrelated third parties have filed petitions to deny or informal objections against such applications.  We opposed the petitions to 
deny  and  the  informal  objections  and  those  applications  are  pending.    See  Note  10.  Commitments  and  Contingencies,  in  the  Notes  to  our 
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.   

(f)  We timely filed applications for renewal of these licenses with the FCC.  We are currently waiting for FCC approval. 

(g)  The license assets for these stations are currently owned by a subsidiary of Cunningham. 

(h)  We have entered into an outsourcing agreement with the unrelated third party owner of WNAB-TV to provide certain non-programming 
related sales, operational and administrative services to WNAB-TV. On July 21, 2005, we filed with the FCC an application to acquire the 
license television broadcast assets of WNAB-TV in Nashville, Tennessee.   The Rainbow / PUSH Coalition (“Rainbow / PUSH”) filed a 
petition  to  deny  that  application  and  also  requested  that  the  FCC  initiate  a  hearing  to  investigate  whether  WNAB-TV  was  improperly 
operated with  WZTV-TV and WUXP-TV, two of  our stations  also located in  Nashville.  The FCC is in the process of considering the 
transfer of the broadcast license and we believe the Rainbow / PUSH petition has no merit.  

(i)  We  have  entered  into  outsourcing  agreements  with  unrelated  third parties,  under  which  the  unrelated  third  parties  provide  certain  non-
programming related sales, operational and managerial services to these stations.  We continue to own all of the assets of these stations and 
to program and control each station’s operations.  

(j)  On February 1, 2008, we entered into an outsourcing agreement with the unrelated third party owner of KFXA-TV to provide certain non-
programming  related  sales,  operational  and  administrative  services  to  KFXA-TV.  During  2008,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  with  this 
unrelated third party for the right to acquire the FCC license of KFXA-TV in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, pending FCC approval. 

(k)  On February 16, 2012, we entered into an outsourcing agreement with the unrelated third party owner of WWHO-TV to provide certain 

non-programming related sales, operational and administrative services to WWHO-TV. 

(l)  WDBB-TV  simulcasts  the  programming  broadcast  on  WTTO-TV  pursuant  to  a  programming  services  agreement.    The  station  rank 
applies to the combined viewership of these stations.  In fourth quarter 2010, the FCC approved Cunningham’s acquisition of WDBB’s 
license  assets.    In  February  2011,  Cunningham  acquired  the  license  assets  and  we  will  continue  to  operate  WDBB  pursuant  to  a  LMA 
agreement.  

(m)  WICD-TV, a satellite of WICS-TV under FCC rules, simulcasts  all of the programming aired on WICS-TV except the news broadcasts.  

WICD-TV airs its own news broadcasts.  The station rank applies to the combined viewership of these stations. 

(n)  WCCU-TV, a satellite of WRSP-TV under FCC rules, simulcasts all of the programming aired on WRSP-TV.  The station rank applies to 

the combined viewership of these stations. 

(o)  KAAS-TV, KOCW-TV, KSAS-LD-TV and KAAS-LD-TV are satellites of KSAS-TV under FCC rules.  These stations simulcast all of the 

programming aired on KSAS-TV’s primary and secondary channels.  

(p)  These stations are rebroadcasting program content from one of the primary stations listed within the same market. 

(q)  On  December  1,  2012,  Deerfield  Media,  Inc.  (Deerfield)  purchased  from  us  the  license  assets  of  KMYS-TV  and  WSTR-TV,  which  we 
previously  owned.    Also,  on  December  1,  2012,  Deerfield  purchased  the  license  assets  of  WPMI-TV  and  WJTC-TV  from  Newport 
Television  LLC  (Newport)  and  KBTV-TV  from  Nexstar  Broadcasting,  Inc.  (Nexstar).    Concurrently,  we  entered  into  an  outsourcing 
agreement with Deerfield to provide certain non-programming related sales, operational and administrative services to these stations. 

(r) 

In  December  2012,  we  acquired  Newport’s  rights  under  the  local  marketing  agreements  with  WLYH-TV  and  KMTW-TV,  as  well  as 
options to acquire the license assets of these stations. 

(s)  On  December  1,  2012,  we  purchased  the  non-license  assets  of  WHAM-TV  from  Newport.    Deerfield  purchased  the  license  assets  of 
WHAM-TV  on  February  1,  2013.    We  entered  into  an  outsourcing  agreement  with  Newport,  on  December  1,  2012,  to  provide  certain 
non-programming related sales, operational and administrative services to WHAM-TV, which was terminated upon Deerfield acquiring the 
license assets on February 1, 2013. 

(t)  The station is continuing to operate under the existing affiliation agreement with Azteca on a temporary basis while we negotiate a new 

affiliation agreement. 

(u)  Effective March 1, 2013, we closed on the sale of the assets of WLAJ-TV. 

2012 Annual Report  5  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS   

This report includes or incorporates forward-looking statements  within  the meaning  of  Section  27A  of  the Securities Act of 
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the U.S. Private 
Securities  Litigation  Reform  Act  of  1995.    We  have  based  these  forward-looking  statements  on  our  current  expectations  and 
projections about future events.  These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, 
including, among other things, the following risks: 

General risks 

 
 
 
 
 
 

the impact of changes in national and regional economies and credit and capital markets; 
consumer confidence; 
the potential impact of changes in tax law; 
the activities of our competitors; 
terrorist acts of violence or war and other geopolitical events; 
natural disasters that impact our advertisers and our stations; 

Industry risks

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

the business conditions of our advertisers particularly in the automotive and service industries; 
competition  with  other  broadcast  television  stations,  radio  stations,  multi-channel  video  programming  distributors 
(MVPDs), internet and broadband content providers and other print and media outlets serving in the same markets; 
availability  and  cost  of  programming  and  the  continued  volatility  of  networks  and  syndicators  that  provide  us  with 
programming content; 
the  effects  of  the  Federal  Communications  Commission’s  (FCC’s)  National  Broadband  Plan  and  the  auctioning  and 
potential reallocation of our broadcasting spectrum;  
the  effects  of  governmental  regulation  of  broadcasting  or  changes  in  those  regulations  and  court  actions  interpreting 
those regulations, including ownership regulations, indecency regulations, retransmission fee regulations and political or 
other advertising restrictions; 
labor  disputes  and  legislation  and  other  union  activity  associated  with  film,  acting,  writing  and  other  guilds  and 
professional sports leagues; 
the broadcasting community’s ability to develop a viable mobile digital broadcast television (mobile DTV) strategy and 
platform and the consumer’s appetite for mobile television; 
the operation of low power devices in the broadcast spectrum, which could interfere with our broadcast signals; 
the impact of reverse network compensation payments charged by networks pursuant to their affiliation agreements with 
broadcasters requiring compensation for network programming; 
the effects of  new ratings system technologies including “people meters” and “set-top boxes,” and the ability of  such 
technologies to be a reliable standard that can be used by advertisers; 
the impact of new FCC rules requiring broadcast stations to publish, among other information, political advertising rates 
online; 
changes in the makeup of the population in the areas where stations are located;  

Risks specific to us 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 

 
 

the effectiveness of our management; 
our ability to attract and maintain local and national advertising; 
our  ability  to  service  our  debt  obligations  and  operate  our  business  under  restrictions  contained  in  our  financing 
agreements; 
our ability to successfully renegotiate retransmission consent agreements; 
our ability to renew our FCC licenses; 
our ability to obtain FCC approval for any future acquisitions, as well as, in certain cases, customary antitrust clearance 
for any future acquisitions; 
our ability to successfully integrate any acquired businesses; 
our  ability  to  maintain  our  affiliation  and  programming  service  agreements  with  our  networks  and  program  service 
providers and at renewal, to successfully negotiate these agreements with favorable terms; 
our ability to effectively respond to technology affecting our industry and to increasing competition from other media 
providers;  
the popularity of syndicated programming we purchase and network programming that we air; 
the strength of ratings for our local news broadcasts including our news sharing arrangements; 

6  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 

the successful execution of our multi-channel broadcasting initiatives including mobile DTV; and 
the results of prior year tax audits by taxing authorities.  

Other matters set forth in this report and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including 
the  Risk Factors  set  forth  in  Item  1A  of  this  report  may  also  cause  actual  results  in  the  future  to  differ  materially  from  those 
described in the forward-looking statements.  However, additional factors and risks not currently known to us or that we currently 
deem  immaterial  may  also  cause  actual  results  in  the  future  to  differ  materially  from  those  described  in  the  forward-looking 
statements.  You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on 
which they are made.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new 
information, future events or otherwise.  In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, events described in the forward-
looking statements discussed in this report might not occur.    

2012 Annual Report  7  

 
 
 
 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The selected consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 have been derived 
from  our  audited  consolidated  financial  statements.    The  consolidated  financial  statements  for  the  years  ended  December  31, 
2012, 2011 and 2010 are included elsewhere in this report.   

The information below should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of 

Operations and the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.   

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA 
(In thousands, except per share data) 

For the years ended December 31, 
Statements of Operations Data: 
Net broadcast revenues (a) 
Revenues realized from station barter arrangements 
Other operating divisions revenues 

Total revenues 

Station production expenses 
Station selling, general and administrative expenses 
Expenses recognized from station barter 

arrangements 

Depreciation and amortization (b)  
Amortization of program contract costs and net 

realizable value adjustments 
Other operating divisions expenses 
Corporate general and administrative expenses 
Gain on asset exchange 
Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets  

Operating income (loss)  

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount 

and deferred financing cost  

(Loss) gain from extinguishment of debt 
Income (loss) from equity and cost method 

investees 

Gain on insurance settlement 
Other income, net 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before 

income taxes 

Income tax (provision) benefit  

Income (loss) from continuing operations 

Discontinued operations: 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net 

of related income taxes 

Net income (loss)  

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling 

interests 
Net income (loss) attributable to Sinclair 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

$   920,593 
86,905 
54,181 
1,061,679 
255,556 
171,279 

$   648,002 
72,773 
44,513 
765,288 
178,612 
123,938 

$   655,836 
75,210 
36,598 
767,644 
154,133 
127,091 

$  

79,834 
85,172 

60,990 
46,179 
33,391 
— 
— 
329,278 

65,742 
51,103 

52,079 
39,486 
28,310 
— 
398 
225,620 

(128,553) 
(335) 

(106,128) 
(4,847) 

9,670 
47 
2,233 

212,340 
(67,852) 
144,488 

3,269 
1,742 
1,717 

121,373 
(44,785) 
76,588 

67,083 
55,141 

60,862 
30,916 
26,800 
— 
4,803 
240,815 

(116,046) 
(6,266) 

(4,861) 
344 
1,865 

115,851 
(40,226) 
75,625 

555,110 
58,182 
43,698 
656,990 
142,415 
122,833 

48,119 
65,247 

73,087 
45,520 
25,632 
(4,945) 
249,799 
(110,717) 

(80,021) 
18,465 

354 
11 
1,448 

(170,460) 
32,512 
(137,948) 

$  

639,624 
59,877 
55,434 
754,935 
158,965 
136,142 

53,327 
63,105 

84,422 
59,987 
26,285 
(3,187) 
463,887 
(287,998) 

(87,634) 
5,451 

(2,703) 
— 
3,000 

(369,884) 
121,362 
(248,522) 

465 
$    144,953 

(411) 
76,177 

(577) 
75,048 

(81) 
(138,029) 

$   

(141) 
$    (248,663) 

$   

$   

(287) 

(379) 

1,100 

2,335 

2,133 

Broadcast Group 

$    144,666 

$   

75,798 

$   

76,148 

$   

(135,694) 

$    (246,530) 

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share Attributable 

to Sinclair Broadcast Group: 
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing 

operations 

Basic earnings (loss) per share 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing 

operations 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share 
Dividends declared per share 

Balance Sheet Data: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Total assets 
Total debt (c) 
Total (deficit) equity 

$  
$  

$  
$  
$  

1.78 
1.79 

1.78 
1.78 
1.54 

$   
$   

$   
$   
$   

0.95 
0.94 

0.95 
0.94 
0.48 

$   
$   

$   
$   
$   

0.96 
0.95 

0.95 
0.94 
0.43 

$   
$   

$   
$   
$   

(1.70) 
(1.70) 

(1.70) 
(1.70) 
— 

$   
$   

$   
$   
$   

(2.87) 
(2.87) 

(2.87) 
(2.87) 
0.80 

$ 
22,865 
$  2,729,697 
$  2,273,379 
(100,053) 
$ 

$ 
12,967 
$  1,571,417 
$  1,206,025 
(111,362) 
$ 

$ 
21,974 
$  1,485,924 
$  1,212,065 
(157,082) 
$ 

$ 
23,224 
$  1,590,029 
$  1,366,308 
(202,222) 
$ 

$ 
16,470 
$  1,816,407 
$  1,362,278 
(58,700) 
$ 

(a)  Net broadcast revenues is defined as broadcast revenues, net of agency commissions.   
(b)  Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and amortization of definite-lived 

intangible assets and other assets. 

(c)  Total debt is defined as notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing, including the current and long-term portions.   

8  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

The  following  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  provides  qualitative  and  quantitative  information  about  our  financial 
performance and condition and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying 
notes to those statements.  This discussion consists of the following sections: 

Executive Overview – a description of our business, financial highlights from 2012, information about industry trends and sources of 
revenues and operating costs; 

Critical Accounting  Policies and Estimates  –  a  discussion  of  the  accounting  policies  that  are  most  important  in  understanding  the 
assumptions  and  judgments  incorporated  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  a  summary  of  recent  accounting 
pronouncements; 

Results of Operations – a summary of  the components of  our revenues by category and by network  affiliation or program service 
arrangement, a summary of other operating data and an analysis of our revenues and expenses for 2012, 2011 and 2010, including 
comparisons between years and certain expectations for 2013; and 

Liquidity and Capital Resources  –  a  discussion  of  our  primary  sources  of  liquidity,  an  analysis  of  our  cash  flows  from  or  used  in 
operating  activities,  investing  activities  and  financing  activities,  a  discussion  of  our  dividend  policy  and  a  summary  of  our 
contractual cash obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements. 

We have two reportable operating segments, “broadcast” and “other operating divisions” that are disclosed separately from our 
corporate  activities.    Our  broadcast  segment  includes  our  stations.    Our  other  operating  divisions  segment  primarily  earned 
revenues  in  2012  from  sign  design  and  fabrication;  regional  security  alarm  operating  and  bulk  acquisitions;  and  real  estate 
ventures.   

STG, included in the broadcast segment and a wholly owned subsidiary of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (SBG), is the primary 
obligor under our Bank Credit Agreement, the 9.25% Notes, the 8.375% Notes and the 6.125% Notes.  SBG is a guarantor under 
the Bank Credit Agreement, the 9.25% Notes, the 8.375% Notes and the 6.125% Notes.  Our Class A Common Stock, Class B 
Common Stock, the 4.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the 4.875% Notes) and the 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 
2027 (the 3.0% Notes) remain obligations or securities of SBG and not obligations or securities of STG.  SBG was the obligor of 
the 6.0% Notes until they were fully redeemed in 2011.     

2012 Annual Report  9  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 

Acquisitions / Divestments: 

 

 

 

In January, we closed the acquisition of the assets of Four Points Media Group LLC (Four Points) for $200.0 million, 
and financed the acquisition with a $180.0 million draw under a recently raised incremental Term Loan B commitment 
under our amended Bank Credit Agreement plus a $20.0 million cash escrow previously paid;  
In  April  2012,  we  closed  the  acquisition  of  the  broadcast  assets  of  Freedom  Communications  (Freedom)  for  $385.0 
million, and financed the acquisition with an incremental draw of $157.5 on Term loan A and an incremental draw of 
$192.5 million on Term loan B under our Bank Credit Agreement plus a $38.5 million escrow release previously paid in 
November 2011;  
In October, we entered into an agreement to purchase substantially all the assets of the WUTB-TV (MNT) station in 
Baltimore,  MD  owned  by  Fox  Television  Stations,  Inc.  (FTS)  for  $2.7  million,  subject  to  FCC  approval  and  other 
closing conditions.  Our agreement to purchase the license assets was assigned to Deerfield for $0.3 million, bringing our 
net purchase price to $2.4 million. Upon closing, we intend to provide sales and other non-programming services to this 
station pursuant to outsourcing arrangements;  

  Effective December 1, 2012, we closed the asset acquisition of Bay TV, which owns WTTA-TV (MNT) in the Tampa / 
St.  Petersburg,  Florida  market,  for  $40.0  million.    We  have  performed  sales,  programming  and  other  management 
services for this station pursuant to a LMA since January 1999.  The LMA was terminated upon closing;   

  Effective December 1, 2012, we closed the asset acquisition of certain broadcast assets of Newport, for $460.5 million 
(excludes amounts paid by Deerfield for the license assets of certain stations) as well as acquired Newport’s rights under 
the local marketing agreements with WLYH-TV (CW) in Harrisburg, PA and KMTW-TV (MNT) in Wichita, KS, along 
with  options  to  acquire  the  license  assets  of  these  stations.    We  financed  the  acquisition  with  the  proceeds  from  our 
offering of 6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due October 2022, which closed in October 2012 as described below, plus a 
$41.3 million cash escrow previously paid;   

  Effective  December  1,  2012,  we  closed  on  our  agreement  to  purchase  the  assets  of  KBTV-TV  (FOX)  located  in 

Beaumont, TX for $12.5 million (excluding amounts paid by Deerfield for the license assets); 

  Effective December 1, 2012, we closed on our agreements with Deerfield to sell Deerfield the license assets of one of 
our  stations  in  San  Antonio  (KMYS-TV  CW)  and  our  station  in  Cincinnati  (WSTR-TV  MNT)  for  a  total  of  $10.7 
million,  and  assigned  to  Deerfield  the  right  to  buy  the  license  assets  of  WPMI-TV  and  WJTC-TV  in  the  Mobile  / 
Pensacola  market,  WHAM-TV  in  the  Rochester,  NY  market  and  KBTV-TV  in  the  Beaumont,  TX  market  for  $13.5 
million.  We also acquired the options to acquire the license assets of these stations held by Deerfield.  We provide sales 
and other non-programming services to each of these five stations pursuant to outsourcing agreements; and 

  On December 31,  2012  we  closed on  the  purchase of  the non-license assets of  GoCom  Media, Inc’s  (GoCom) three 
television stations, WRSP-TV (FOX), WCCU-TV (FOX), WBUI-TV (CW), in the Champaign / Springfield / Decatur, 
Illinois market for $25.7 million, along with options for the license assets.  We provide sales and other non-programming 
services to these stations pursuant outsourcing agreements; 

Other: 

 

 

In February, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share which was paid on March 15, 
2012, to the holders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2012; 
In May, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share which was paid on June 15, 2012, 
to the holders of record at the close of business on June 1, 2012; 

  On May 14, 2012, the Company and the licensees of stations to which we provide services, representing 20 affiliates of 
Fox Broadcast Company (FOX) in total, extended the network affiliation agreements with FOX from the existing term 
of December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017.  Concurrently, we entered into an assignable option agreement with FTS 
giving  us  or  our  assignee  the  right  to  purchase  substantially  all  the  assets  of  the  WUTB-TV  station  (Baltimore,  MD) 
owned by FTS, which has a program service arrangement with MyNetwork, and entered into an option agreement giving 
FTS  the  right  to  purchase  our  stations  in  up  to  three  of  the  following  four  markets:  Las  Vegas,  NV,  Raleigh,  NC, 
Cincinnati,  OH,  and  Norfolk,  VA.  The  option  was  due  to  expire  March  30,  2013;  however,  in  January  2013,  FTS 
notified  the  Company  that  it  would  not  exercise  its  option  to  purchase  our  stations  in  any  of  the  aforementioned 
markets.  In the second quarter of 2012, we paid $25.0 million to FOX pursuant to the agreement and we are required to 
pay the last installment payment in the amount of $25.0 million, due on April 26, 2013; 
In August, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share which was paid on September 14, 
2012, to the holders of record at the close of business on August 31, 2012; 

 

10  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

In August, we entered into a multi-year retransmission consent agreement with DISH Network for continued carriage in 
all of our markets; 
In September, we entered into an amendment of our Bank Credit Agreement to provide more flexibility with restrictive 
covenants and permitted incremental indebtedness. There were no changes pertaining to interest rates or maturities of 
the outstanding debt or commitments under the Bank Credit Agreement; 
In October, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022 (the Notes). The 
Notes  were  priced  at  100%  of  their  principal  amount  and  bear  interest  at  a  rate  of  6.125%  per  annum  payable  semi-
annually  on  April  1  and  October  1,  commencing  on  April  1,  2013.  The  Notes  mature  in  October  2022  and  are 
guaranteed by Sinclair and certain of its’ subsidiaries. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for more information; 
In November, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share and a special cash dividend 
of $1.00 per share payable on December 14, 2012, to the holders of record at the close of business on November 30, 
2012; and 
In November, we entered into a multi-year retransmission consent agreement with Mediacom for continued carriage of 
our stations which are located in Mediacom’s markets. 

  Effective January 1, 2013, we entered into a six-year affiliation agreement with the CBS Network on its Portland, ME 

 

 

 

 

 

and Cedar Rapids, IA affiliates, expiring December 31, 2018;  
In January 2013,  we entered into an agreement to sell the assets of  WLWC-TV (CW) in Providence, Rhode Island to 
OTA Broadcasting LLC for $13.8 million.  The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2013, subject to 
FCC approval and other closing conditions. As of December, 31, 2012 the station is classified as held for sale and the 
results of operations are classified as discontinued operations; 
In February 2013, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share which is payable on March 15, 
2013, to the holders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2013; 
In  February  2013,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  purchase  certain  stock  and/or  broadcast  assets  of  four  television 
stations,  located  in  four  markets,  owned  by  COX  Media  Group  for  $99.0  million  less  $4.3  million  of  working  capital 
adjustments, less amounts to be paid by third party companies, and entered into an agreement to provide sales services 
to one other station. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2013 subject to the approval of the 
FCC and customary antitrust clearance;  
In  February  2013,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  purchase  the  broadcast  assets  of  18  television  stations  owned  by 
Barrington  Broadcasting  Group,  LLC  for  $370.0  million,  less  amounts  to  be  paid  by  third  parties,  and  entered  into 
agreements to operate or provide sales services to another six stations. Also, the Company will sell its station WSYT-TV 
(FOX) and assign its LMA with WNYS-TV (MNT) in Syracuse, NY, and sell its station in Peoria IL, WYZZ-TV (FOX). 
The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2013 subject to the approval of the FCC  and customary 
antitrust clearance; 
In  February,  we  entered  into  a  retransmission  consent  agreement  with  DirecTV  for  continued  carriage  in  all  of  our 
markets; and  

  Effective March 1, 2013, we closed the sale of the assets of WLAJ-TV (ABC) in Lansing, MI to an unrelated third party 
for $14.4 million.  The related results from operations, net of related income taxes, have been reclassified from income 
from continuing operations and reflected as net income from discontinued operations. 

  Political advertising increases in even-numbered years, such as 2012, due to the advertising expenditures from candidates 
running  in  local  and  national  elections  and  issue-related  advertiser  spending.    In  addition,  political  revenue  has 
consistently risen between presidential election or mid-term election years such as from 2008 to 2012 or from 2006 to 
2010, respectively.  In every fourth year, such as 2012, political advertising is usually elevated further due to presidential 
elections;  

  The FCC has permitted broadcast television stations to use their digital spectrum for a wide variety of services including 

multi-channel broadcasts.  The FCC “must-carry” rules only apply to a station’s primary digital stream;   

  Retransmission  consent  rules  provide  a  mechanism  for  broadcasters  to  seek  payment  from  MVPDs  who  carry 
broadcasters’ signals.  Recognition of  the value  of  the programming content  provided by broadcasters, including local 
news and other programming and network programming all in HD has generated increased local revenues;  

  We,  as  well  as  a  number  of  other  broadcasters,  have  joined  and  worked  together  in  organizations  such  as  the  NAB 
(along with OMVC now merged), M500 and the MCV to focus on efforts to accelerate the nationwide availability  of 
mobile  DTV  and  other  advanced  digital  distribution  services  and  work  through  the  many  programming,  advertising, 
distribution and aggregation opportunities.  There is potential for broadcasters to create an additional revenue stream by  

2012 Annual Report  11  

 
 
 
 
providing  their  signals  to  a  wide  variety  of  mobile  /  portable  devices  (tablets,  laptops,  smartphones,  etc.)  as  well  as 
through other multi-channel / multi-platform initiatives;  

  Automotive-related  advertising  is  a  significant  portion  of  our  total  net  revenues  in  all  periods  presented  and  these 
revenues  trended  downward  in  most  of  2009  due  to  the  economic  turmoil.    However,  this  sector  has  dramatically 
trended upward in the past few years due to improved economic conditions; 

  Many broadcasters are enhancing / upgrading their websites to use the internet to deliver rich media content, such as 
newscasts  and  weather  updates,  to  attract  advertisers  and  to  compete  with  other  internet  sites  and  smart  phone  and 
tablet device applications; 
Seasonal advertising increases  occur  in the  second and fourth quarters due to the anticipation  of  certain seasonal and 
holiday spending by consumers; 

 

  Broadcasters have found ways to increase returns on their news programming initiatives while continuing to maintain 

 

locally produced content through the use of news sharing arrangements; 
Station outsourcing arrangements are becoming more common as broadcasters seek out ways to improve revenues and 
margins; 

  Advertising revenue related to the Olympics occurs in even numbered years and the Super Bowl is aired on a different 

network each year.  Both of these popularly viewed events can have an impact on our advertising revenues; and 

  Compensation  from  networks  to  their  affiliates  in  exchange  for  broadcasting  of  network  programming  has  halted.  

Networks now require compensation from broadcasters for the use of network programming.   

Our operating revenues are derived from local and national advertisers and, to a much lesser extent, from political advertisers.  
We also generate local revenues from our retransmission consent agreements with MVPDs.  Our revenues from local advertisers 
have seen a continued upward trend, with the exception of 2008 and 2009 when non-political revenues fell due to the economic 
recession.    Revenues  from  national  advertisers  have  continued  to  trend  downward  when  measured  as  a  percentage  of  total 
broadcast revenues.  We believe this trend is the result of our focus on increasing local advertising revenues as  a percentage of 
total advertising revenues, combined with a decrease in overall spending by national advertisers and an increase in the number of 
competitive media outlets providing national advertisers multiple alternatives in which to advertise their goods or services.  Our 
efforts to mitigate the effect of these increasingly competitive media outlets for national advertisers include continuing our efforts 
to increase local revenues and developing innovative sales and marketing strategies to sell traditional and non-traditional services 
to our advertisers including the success of multi-channel digital initiatives together with mobile DTV.  In addition, our revenue 
success is dependent on the success and advertising spending levels of the automotive industry. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES 

This  discussion  and  analysis  of  our  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  is  based  on  our  consolidated  financial 
statements  which  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.    The 
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, 
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  On an on-going basis, we evaluate our 
estimates including those related to bad debts, program contract costs, intangible assets, income taxes, property and equipment, 
and  investments.    We  base  our  estimates  on  historical  experience  and  on  various  other  assumptions  that  are  believed  to  be 
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets 
and  liabilities  that  are  not  readily  apparent  from  other  sources.    These  estimates  have  been  consistently  applied  for  all  years 
presented in this report and in the past we have not experienced material differences between these estimates and actual results.  
However,  because  future  events  and  their  effects  cannot  be  determined  with  certainty,  actual  results  could  differ  from  our 
estimates and such differences could be material.   

We  have  identified  the  policies  below  as  critical  to  our  business  operations  and  to  the  understanding  of  our  results  of 
operations.  For a detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1. Nature of Operations and 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.  

Valuation  of  Goodwill,  Long-Lived  Assets,  Intangible  Assets  and  Equity  and  Cost  Method  Investments.  We  periodically  evaluate  our 
goodwill, broadcast licenses, long-lived assets, intangible assets and equity and cost method investments for potential impairment 
indicators.    Our  judgments  regarding  the  existence  of  impairment  indicators  are  based  on  estimated  future  cash  flows,  market 
conditions, operating performance of our stations, legal factors and other various qualitative factors.   

We have determined our broadcast licenses to be indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the accounting guidance 
for goodwill and other intangible assets, which requires such assets along with our goodwill to be tested for impairment on an 
annual basis or more often when certain triggering events occur.  As of December 31, 2012, we had $1,074.0 million of goodwill, 

12  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$85.1 million in broadcast licenses, and $623.4 million in definite-lived intangibles.  We perform our annual impairment tests for 
goodwill and broadcast licenses at the beginning of the fourth quarter each year.   

In 2011, we early adopted the accounting guidance related to the annual goodwill impairment assessment, which allowed us, to 
first qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that goodwill has been impaired.  As part of our qualitative assessment 
for goodwill impairment, we consider the following factors related to the reporting units, where applicable: 

 
 
 

Significant changes in the macroeconomic conditions; 
Significant changes in the regulatory environment;  
Significant changes in  the operating model, management,  products and services, customer base, cost  structure and/or 
margin trends;  

  Comparison of current and prior year operating performance and forecast trends for future operating performance; and 
  The excess of the fair value over carrying value of the reporting units determined in prior quantitative assessments.    

If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, we will apply the quantitative two-step method 
for goodwill.  Prior to 2011, the annual impairment test for goodwill was performed using the quantitative two-step method, for 
all reporting units.  Our quantitative assessment for our goodwill consists of estimating the fair value of our reporting units, using 
a combination of a market approach, using recent comparable market transactions and estimated market multiples, and an income 
approach, using a discounted cash flow model.  The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of our reporting units to 
test our goodwill for impairment consist of discount rates, revenue and expense growth rates and comparable business multiples.  
The projected growth rates are based on our internal forecast of future performance, historical trends, and projected long-range 
inflation and long-term industry projections.  The discount rate is based on a number of factors including market interest rates, a 
weighted average cost of capital analysis based on the target capital structure for a television station, and includes adjustments for 
market  risk  and  company  specific  risk.    For  goodwill,  if  we  determine  that  the  fair  value  of  the  reporting  unit  is  less  than  the 
carrying value, we then perform the second step which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and 
liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill to determine 
the implied fair value.  An impairment charge will be recognized only when the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is 
less than its carrying amount.   

We early adopted the recent accounting guidance related to the annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test, which 
allowed us, beginning with our 2012 indefinite-lived intangible impairment test, to first qualitatively assess whether it is more likely 
than  not  that  an  indefinite-lived  intangible  asset  has  been  impaired.    As  part  of  our  qualitative  assessment  for  indefinite-lived 
intangible assets, we consider the following factors related to the indefinite-lived intangible asset, where applicable: 

 

 

 

 

Significant changes in cost factors that could affect the inputs used to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived 
intangible asset; 
Significant changes in the legal or regulatory environment;  
Significant  changes  in  management,  key  personnel,  strategy  or  customers  that  could  affect  the  inputs  used  to 
determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset; 
Significant changes in the industry and/or market; 
Significant changes in macroeconomic conditions; 

 
  Comparison of current and prior year operating performance and forecast trends for future operating performance; 

and 

  The  excess  of  the  fair  value  over  carrying  value  of  the  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  determined  in  prior 

quantitative assessments.   

If we conclude that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, we will calculate the fair market 
value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and compare to the book value.  Prior to 2012, the annual impairment test for our 
indefinite-lived intangibles, broadcast licenses, involved a quantitative assessment in which we  estimated the fair market value of 
our broadcast licenses and compared to the book  value.  We estimated the fair market value of  our broadcast licenses using a 
discounted cash flow model.  The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of our broadcast licenses consist of discount 
rates,  normalized  market  share,  normalized  profit  margin,  expected  future  growth  rates  and  estimated  start-up  costs.    We  then 
compared the estimated fair market value to the book value of these assets to determine if impairment exists.  For the broadcast 
licenses, if the fair value is less than book value, we would record the resulting impairment.   

We  aggregate  our  stations  by  market  for  purposes  of  our  goodwill  and  license  impairment  testing  and  we  believe  that  our 
markets are most representative of our broadcast reporting units because segment management views, manages and evaluates our 
stations on a market basis.  Furthermore, in our markets where we operate or provide services to more than one station, certain  

2012 Annual Report  13  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
costs  of  operating  the  stations  are  shared  including  the  use  of  buildings  and  equipment,  the  sales  force  and  administrative 
personnel.    Our  discounted  cash  flow  model  is  based  on  our  judgment  of  future  market  conditions  within  each  designated 
marketing area, as well as discount rates that would be used by market participants in an arms-length transaction.     

Based on the results of our annual qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment performed in 2012, we concluded that we 
would need to perform a quantitative “Step 1” test for three of our markets which had aggregate goodwill  of $79.5 million as of 
October 1, 2012, the date of our annual impairment test.  These markets had a decrease in operating results for the past few years 
and therefore, we estimated the fair value of  these reporting  units  based on a market approach and income approach.  For all 
three markets, the fair value of the reporting unit  exceeded the respective carrying value by more than 10%.  For all our other 
reporting units, we concluded based on the qualitative  assessment that it was more likely than not that the fair values of  these 
reporting  units  would  sufficiently  exceed  their  carrying  values  and  it  was  not  necessary  to  perform  the  quantitative  two-step 
method.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase in our discount rate and/or a decrease in our multiple of 10% would 
not result in goodwill impairment.   Based on the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment performed in 2011, we 
concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair values of all reporting units would sufficiently exceed their carrying value 
and  thus  it  was  not  necessary  to  perform  the  quantitative  two-step  method.      The  qualitative  factors  for  our  reporting  units 
reviewed during our 2012 and 2011 assessments, with the exception of the three markets in which we performed a quantitative 
assessment,  indicated  stable  or  improving  margins  and  favorable  or  stable  forecasted  economic  conditions  including  stable 
discount rates and comparable business multiples. Additionally, the results of prior quantitative assessments supported significant 
excess fair value over carrying value of our reporting units.  As a result of our 2010 annual quantitative impairment assessment, all 
of our reporting units had fair values in excess of carrying value and therefore, we did not record any goodwill impairment during 
the year ended December 31, 2010.   

Based on the annual qualitative assessment for broadcast license impairment performed in 2012, we concluded that it was more 
likely  than  not  that  the  fair  values  of  all  broadcast  licenses  would  sufficiently  exceed  their  carrying  values  and  thus  it  was  not 
necessary  to  perform  a  quantitative  test.    The  qualitative  factors  for  our  broadcast  licenses  indicated  an  increase  in  market 
revenues, consistent expected market growth rates, stable market shares and stable cost factors from 2011 to 2012.  We recorded 
a $0.4 million interim impairment charge in the first quarter of 2011 due to an anticipated increase in construction costs for one of 
our stations as a result of converting to full power.  As a result of our annual impairment test for broadcast licenses in 2011, we 
concluded that impairment did not exist.  The revenue, expense and constant growth rates used in determining the fair value of 
our broadcast licenses increased slightly from 2010 to 2011.  The discount rates used to determine the fair value of our broadcast 
licenses did not change significantly from 2010 to 2011.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $4.8 million in 
impairment on our broadcast licenses and other assets.  The $4.8 million impairment charge recorded in 2010 was primarily the 
result of additional cash outflows for increased signal strength necessary to maintain competitive market positions.   

We believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized appropriate assumptions to evaluate whether it was more likely than 
not that the fair value of our reporting units and broadcast licenses was less than their carrying values.  If future results are not 
consistent with our assumptions and estimates, including future events such as a deterioration of market conditions or significant 
increases in discount rates, we could be exposed to impairment charges in the future.  Any resulting impairment loss could have a 
material adverse impact on our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of 
cash flows. 

For  all  other  long-lived  assets,  including  fixed  assets  and  definite-lived  intangibles,  we  assess  recoverability  of  the  assets 
whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  net  book  value  of  the  assets  may  not  be  recoverable.    If  we 
conclude  that  such  triggering  event  has  occurred,  we  perform  a  two-step  quantitative  test  to  first  assess  whether  the  asset  is 
recoverable  by  comparing  the  sum  of  undiscounted  cash  flows  of  the  asset  group  to  the  carrying  value  of  the  asset  group, 
including goodwill.  If the sum of undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset group, we then measure and 
allocate the amount of impairment to record for each of the assets in the asset group by comparing the respective fair value of the 
assets to their carrying values.  We did not have any indicators of impairment of our long-lived assets in 2010, 2011 or 2012.   

When factors indicate that there may be a decrease in value of an equity or cost method investment, we assess that investment 
and determine whether a loss  in value has occurred.  If  that  loss is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment loss is 
recorded.    For  any  investments  that  indicate  a  potential  impairment,  we  estimate  the  fair  value  of  those  investments  using 
discounted cash flow models, unrelated third party valuations or industry comparables, based on the various facts available to us.  
During 2012 and 2010, we recorded $1.3 million and $6.7 million of impairment on equity method investments, respectively.  No 
impairment of our equity or cost method investments was recorded 2011. 

Revenue Recognition.  Advertising revenues, net of agency commissions, are recognized in the period during which  commercials 
are aired.  All other revenues are recognized as services are provided.  The revenues realized from station barter arrangements are 
recorded as the programs are aired at the estimated fair value of the advertising airtime given in exchange for the program rights.  
Some of our retransmission consent agreements contain both advertising and retransmission consent elements that are paid in  

14  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
cash.    We  have  determined  that  these  agreements  are  revenue  arrangements  with  multiple  deliverables.    Advertising  and 
retransmission consent deliverables sold under our agreements are separated into different units of accounting based on fair value.   
Revenue  applicable  to  the  advertising  element  of  the  arrangement  is  recognized  consistent  with  the  advertising  revenue  policy 
noted  above.    Revenue  applicable  to  the  retransmission  consent  element  of  the  arrangement  is  recognized  over  the  life  of  the 
agreement.   

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from extending 
credit  to  our  customers  that  are  unable  to  make  required  payments.    If  the  economy  and/or  the  financial  condition  of  our 
customers  were  to  deteriorate,  resulting  in  an  impairment  of  their  ability  to  make  payments,  additional  allowances  may  be 
required.  For example, a 10% increase  in the balance of our allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2012, would 
increase bad debt expense by approximately $0.3 million.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was $3.1 million and $3.0 million 
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 

Program Contract Costs.    We  have  agreements  with  distributors  for  the  rights  to  televise  programming  over  contract  periods, 
which generally run from one to seven years.  Contract payments are made in installments over terms that are generally equal  to 
or  shorter  than  the  contract  period.    Each  contract  is  recorded  as  an  asset  and  a  liability  at  an  amount  equal  to  its  gross  cash 
contractual  commitment  when  the  license  period  begins  and  the  program  is  available  for  its  first  showing.    The  portion  of 
program contracts which become payable within one year is reflected as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheets.  As 
of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $69.3 million and $54.5 million, respectively, in program contract assets and $104.4 
million and $91.5 million, respectively, in program contract liabilities. 

The  programming  rights  are  reflected  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  at  the  lower  of  unamortized  cost  or  estimated  net 
realizable  value  (NRV).    Estimated  NRVs  are  based  on  management’s  expectation  of  future  advertising  revenue,  net  of  sales 
commissions, to be generated by the remaining program material available under the contract terms.  Amortization of program 
contract costs is generally computed using a four-year accelerated method or a straight-line method, depending on the length of 
the contract.  Program contract costs estimated by management to be amortized within one year are classified as current assets.  
Program  contract  liabilities  are  typically  paid  on  a  scheduled  basis  and  are  not  impacted  by  adjustments  for  amortization  or 
estimated NRV.  If our estimate of future advertising revenues declines, then additional write downs to NRV may be required.   

Income Tax.  We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statements carrying 
amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.  As of December 31 2011, we recorded $4.9 million in deferred tax assets. As 
of  December  31,  2012  and  2011,  we  recorded  $234.1  million  and  $247.6  million,  respectively,  in  deferred  tax  liabilities.    We 
provide a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred 
tax assets will not be realized.  In evaluating our ability to realize net deferred tax assets,  we consider all available evidence, both 
positive  and  negative,  including  our  past  operating  results,  tax  planning  strategies  and  forecasts  of  future  taxable  income.    In 
considering these sources of taxable income, we must make certain judgments that are based on the plans and estimates used to 
manage our underlying businesses on a long-term basis.  A valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets related 
to a substantial portion of our available state net operating loss carryforwards, based on past operating results, expected timing of 
the reversals of existing temporary book/tax basis differences, alternative tax strategies and projected future taxable income. 

In  May  2011,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (FASB)  issued  new  guidance  for  fair  value  measurements.    The 
purpose  of  the  new  guidance  is  to  have  a  consistent  definition  of  fair  value  between  U.S.  Generally  Accepted  Accounting 
Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).  Many of the amendments to GAAP are not expected 
to have a significant impact on practice; however, the new guidance does require new and enhanced disclosure about fair value 
measurements.  The amendments were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be 
applied prospectively. This guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements but we have included 
the additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures required for our Level 3 fair value measurements beginning with the quarter 
ended March 31, 2012. 

In September 2011, the FASB issued the final Accounting Standards Update for  goodwill impairment testing.  The standard 
allows an entity to first consider qualitative factors when deciding whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step goodwill 
impairment test.  An entity would need to perform step-one if it determines qualitatively that it is more-likely-than-not that the 
fair  value  of  a  reporting  unit  is  less  than  its  carrying  amount.    The  changes  are  effective  prospectively  for  annual  and  interim 
goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  We adopted this new guidance in the 
fourth  quarter  of  2011  in  completing  our  annual  impairment  analysis.    See  Note 5. Goodwill, Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangible 
Assets  for  further  discussion  of  the  results  of  our  goodwill  impairment  analysis.    This  guidance  impacts  how  we  perform  the 
annual goodwill impairment test; however, it did not impact our consolidated financial statements as the guidance does not impact 
the timing or amount of any resulting impairment charges. 

2012 Annual Report  15  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In July 2012, the FASB issued new guidance for  testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  The new guidance 
allows  companies  to  perform  a  qualitative  assessment  to  determine  whether  further  impairment  testing  of  indefinite-lived 
intangible assets is necessary, similar to the approach now applied to goodwill.  Companies can first determine based on certain 
qualitative factors whether it is “more likely than not” (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that an indefinite-lived intangible 
asset is impaired.  The new standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for 
impairment.  The revised standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after 
September  30,  2012  and  early  adoption  is  permitted.  We  adopted  this  new  guidance  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012  when 
completing our annual impairment analysis.   See Note 5. Goodwill, Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangible Assets for further discussion 
of  the  results  of  our  broadcast  license  impairment  analysis.    This  guidance  impacted  how  we  perform  our  annual  impairment 
testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets and changed our related disclosures for 2012; however, it does not have an impact on 
our consolidated financial statements as the guidance does not impact the timing or amount of any resulting impairment charges.   

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

In general, this discussion is related to the results of our continuing operations, except for discussions regarding our cash flows, 
which also include the results of our discontinued operations.  The results of the acquired stations from Four Points as of January 
1, 2012 (acquisition date), from Freedom as of April 1, 2012 (acquisition date) and Newport as of December 1, 2012 (acquisition 
date) are included in our results of  our continuing operations. In 2012, we determined  that the operating results of  WLAJ-TV, 
which was one of the stations acquired in the Freedom acquisition, and WLWC-TV, which was one of the stations acquired in the 
Four  Points  acquisition,  should  be  accounted  for  as  discontinued  operations  and  therefore  the  results  are  not  included  in  our 
consolidated  results  of  continuing  operations  year  ended  December  31,  2012.  Unless  otherwise  indicated,  references  in  this 
discussion  and  analysis  to  2012,  2011  and  2010 are  to  our  fiscal  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010, respectively.  
Additionally,  any  references  to  the  first,  second,  third  or  fourth  quarters  are  to  the  three  months  ended  March  31,  June  30, 
September 30 and December 31, respectively, for the year being discussed.   We have two reportable segments, “broadcast” and 
“other operating divisions” that are disclosed separately from our corporate activities.   

Our operating results are usually subject to seasonal fluctuations.  Usually, the second and fourth quarter operating results are 
higher  than  the  first  and  third  quarters’  because  advertising  expenditures  are  increased  in  anticipation  of  certain  seasonal  and 
holiday spending by consumers.   

Our operating results are usually subject to fluctuations from political advertising.  In even numbered years, political spending is 
usually  significantly  higher  than  in  odd  numbered  years  due  to  advertising  expenditures  preceding  local  and  national  elections.  
Additionally,  every  four  years,  political  spending  is  usually  elevated  further  due  to  advertising  expenditures  preceding  the 
presidential election.   

The following table sets forth certain of our operating data from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 

2011 and 2010 (in millions).  For definitions of terms, see the footnotes to the table in Item 6. Selected Financial Data.   

Net broadcast revenues 
Revenues realized from station barter arrangements 
Other operating divisions revenues 
Total revenues 
Station production expenses 
Station selling, general and administrative expenses 
Expenses recognized from station barter arrangements 
Depreciation and amortization 
Other operating divisions expenses 
Corporate general and administrative expenses 
Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets  
Operating income  
Net income attributable to Sinclair Broadcast Group 

2012 
920.6 
86.9 
54.2 
1061.7 
255.5 
171.3 
79.8 
146.2 
46.2 
33.4 
— 
329.3 
144.7 

$  

$  
$  

16  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

$   

$   

Years Ended December 31, 
2011 
648.0 
72.8 
44.5 
765.3 
178.6 
123.9 
65.7 
103.3 
39.5 
28.3 
0.4 
225.6 
75.8 

$  
$  

$  
$  

2010 
655.8 
75.2 
36.6 
767.6 
154.1 
127.1 
67.1 
116.0 
30.9 
26.8 
4.8 
240.8 
76.1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BROADCAST SEGMENT 

The following table presents our revenues from continuing operations, net of agency commissions, for the three years ended 

December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions): 

$  

Local revenues: 

Non-political  
Political 
Total local 
National revenues: 
Non-political 
Political 
Total national 

Total net broadcast revenues 

$  

2012 

643.5 
12.9 
656.4 

180.2 
84.0 
264.2 
920.6 

2011 

498.7 
2.5 
501.2 

141.0 
5.8 
146.8 
648.0 

$  

$  

2010 

’12 vs. ‘11 

’11 vs. ‘10 

Percent Change 

$  

$  

464.0 
12.8 
476.8 

149.8 
29.2 
179.0 
655.8 

29.0% 
(a) 
31.0% 

27.8% 
(a) 
80.0% 
42.1% 

7.5% 
(a) 
5.1% 

(5.9%) 
(a) 
(18.0%) 
(1.2%) 

(a)  Political  revenue  is  not  comparable  from  year  to  year  due  to  the  cyclicality  of  elections.    See  Political  Revenues  below  for  more 

information.   

Our largest categories of  advertising and their approximate percentages of  2012 net time sales, which include the advertising 
portion of our local and national broadcast revenues, were automotive (20.8%), political (14.0%), services (13.9%), schools (5.9%) 
and retail / department stores (5.0%).  No other advertising category accounted for more than 5.0% of our net time sales in 2012.  
No  advertiser  accounted  for  more  than  1.2%  of  our  consolidated  revenue  in  2012.    We  conduct  business  with  thousands  of 
advertisers.   

Our  primary  types  of  programming  and  their  approximate  percentages  of  2012  net  time  sales  were  syndicated  programming 
(36.7%),  network  programming  (24.2%),  local  news  (25.1%),  sports  programming  (8.1%)  and  direct  advertising  programming 
(5.9%). 

From a network affiliation or program service arrangement perspective, the following table sets forth our affiliate percentages 

of net time sales for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011: 

Percent of Net Time Sales for the 
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 

Net Time Sales  
Percent Change 

2012 

2011 

’12 vs. ‘11(c) 

36.9% 
19.5% 
18.6% 
12.5% 
10.7% 
1.0% 
0.7% 
0.1% 

47.4% 
20.5% 
3.0% 
15.8% 
12.4% 
0.5% 
0.4% 

N/A 

9.6% 
33.1% 
786.2% 
11.0% 
22.0% 
169.7% 
110.8% 
nm 

’11 vs. ‘10 
(2.1%) 
(11.8%) 
(7.4%) 
(5.8%) 
(10.9%) 
(23.2%) 
215.2% 
nm 

FOX 
ABC 
CBS 
MyNetworkTV 
The CW 
NBC 
Digital  
Other 
Total  

# of 
Stations(a) 
24 
11 
11 
19 
15 
3 
(b)  
2 
85 

nm- Not meaningful 
N/A- Not applicable 

(a)  During 2012, we acquired or entered into outsourcing agreements to provide certain non-programming related sales, operational and 
administrative services to 27 stations with the following network affiliation or program service arrangements: CBS (two stations in the 
first quarter, five stations in the second quarter and two stations in the fourth quarter), NBC (two stations in the fourth quarter), FOX 
(four stations in the fourth quarter), ABC (one station in the second quarter and one station in the fourth quarter), CW (two stations in 
the first quarter,  one station in the second quarter and  two stations in the fourth quarter), MyNetworkTV (two stations in the  first 
quarter  and  one  station  in  the  fourth  quarter),  Other  (one  station  in  the  first  quarter  and  one  station  in  the  fourth  quarter).  We 
reclassified  the  results  of  operations  of  WLAJ-TV,  an  ABC  station  acquired  in  the  second  quarter  and  WLWC-TV  a  CW  station 
acquired in the first quarter, as discontinued operations as discussed in Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and therefore the 
net time sales of WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV are not included in the percentages above and are excluded from the number of stations. 

2012 Annual Report  17  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(b)  We broadcast programming from network affiliations or program service arrangements with CBS (rebroadcasted content from other 
primary  channels  within  the  same  markets),  The  CW,  MyNetworkTV,  This  TV,  ME  TV,  LATV,  Weather  Radar,  The  Weather 
Authority Network, Live Well Network, Antenna TV, Bounce Network, The Country Network, Azteca, Telemundo and Estrella on 
additional channels through our stations’ second and third digital signals. 

(c)  The  amount  of  increases  in  net  time  sales  related  to  2012  acquisitions  was:  FOX  0.4%,  ABC  10.4%,  CBS  752.6%,  MyNetworkTV 

3.2%, CW 19.3%, NBC 124.0% and Digital 159.8%. 

Net Broadcast Revenues.    Net  broadcast  revenues  increased  $272.6  million  for  2012  when  comparing  to  2011,  of  which  $164.2 
million  was  related  to  stations  acquired  during  2012.  Additionally,  revenues  earned  pursuant  to  the  LMA  with  the  Freedom 
stations  during  the  first  quarter  of  2012  included  $2.2  million  for  management  services  performed  and  $7.8  million  of  pass-
through costs.  The remaining increase was due to increases in advertising revenues generated from the political, direct response 
and  beer  /  wine  sectors.  These  increases  were  partially  offset  by  a  decrease  in  the  internet,  soft  drinks,  movies  and  drugs  / 
cosmetic sectors. Excluding the stations acquired in 2012, automotive, which typically is our largest category, represented 20.3% 
of net time sales for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

From a revenue category standpoint, 2011 when compared to 2010 was impacted by increases in most of the advertising sectors 
as the country’s economic conditions in general continued to strengthen.  Automotive, our largest category in 2011, was up 9.7% 
compared to 2010 as automotive dealers and manufacturers increased spending in response to an increase in auto sales.  

Political  Revenues.  Political  revenues,  which  include  time  sales  from  political  advertising,  increased  by  $88.6  million  to  $96.9 
million for 2012 when compared to 2011. Political revenues decreased by $33.7 million to $8.3 million for 2011 when compared 
to 2010.  Political revenues are typically higher in election years such as 2012 and 2010. Accordingly, we expect political revenues 
to decrease in 2013 from 2012 levels.   

Local  Revenues.    Excluding  political  revenues,  our  local  broadcast  revenues,  which  include  local  times  sales,  retransmission 
revenues and other local revenues, were up $144.8 million for 2012 when compared to 2011, of which $112.1 million related to 
the stations acquired in 2012. The remaining increase is due to an increase in advertising spending particularly in the automotive 
and direct response sectors and an increase in retransmission revenues from MVPDs. These increases were partially offset by a 
decrease due to a decline in advertising revenues from the schools, fast food and services sectors and a change in networks for the 
Super Bowl programming from FOX to NBC as we had 20 FOX stations compared to one NBC station at the time when the 
Super Bowl aired in February 2012.  Excluding  political revenues, our  local broadcast  revenues, which include local times sales, 
retransmission revenues and other local revenues, were up $34.7 million for 2011, compared to 2010.  The increase is due to an 
increase in advertising spending particularly in the automotive sector, an increase in retransmission revenues from MVPDs and 
amounts earned for services performed pursuant to the Four Points and Freedom LMAs ($2.2 million for management services 
performed and $7.8 million of pass-through costs). 

National Revenues.  Our  national  broadcast  revenues,  excluding  political  revenues,  which  include  national  time  sales  and  other 
national revenues, were up $39.2 million for 2012 when compared to 2011, of which $38.5 million related to the stations acquired 
in 2012.  The remaining increase was due to increases in advertising revenues generated from the  direct response and services 
sectors.  These increases were partially offset by a decline in advertising revenues in telecommunications and the drugs / cosmetic 
sectors.  Excluding political revenues, our national broadcast revenues were down $8.8 million for 2011 when compared to 2010.  
This  was  primarily  due  to  a  decrease  in  advertising  spending  by  the  media,  telecommunications,  home  products,  professional 
services and movies sectors.   

18  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  table  presents  our  significant  operating  expense  categories  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and 

2010 (in millions): 

Station production expenses 
Station selling, general and 
administrative expenses 
Amortization of program 
contract costs and net 
realizable value adjustments 

Corporate general and 

administrative expenses 

Impairment of goodwill, 

intangible and other assets 
Depreciation and amortization 

2012 
255.5 

  $ 

2011 
178.6 

  $ 

2010 
154.1 

  $ 

Percent Change 
(Increase/(Decrease)) 

’12 vs. ‘11 
43.1% 

’11 vs. ‘10 
15.9% 

  $  

171.3 

  $   123.9 

  $   127.1 

38.3% 

(2.5%) 

  $  

61.0 

  $  

52.1 

  $  

60.9 

  $  

28.9 

  $  

24.8 

  $  

23.7 

17.1% 

16.5% 

(14.4%) 

4.6% 

  $  — 

  $ 

0.4 

  $ 

4.8 

(100.0%) 

(91.7%) 

expenses 

  $ 

77.5 

  $ 

44.6 

  $ 

49.2 

73.8% 

(9.3%) 

Station production expenses.  Station production expenses increased $76.9 million during 2012 compared to 2011, of  which $42.7 
million  related  to  the  stations  acquired  in  2012.  The  remaining  increases  for  the  year  were  primarily  due  to  an  increase  in  fees 
pursuant  to  network  affiliation  agreements,  increased  compensation  expense,  increased  employee  /  management  incentive 
bonuses, increased news profit sharing expenses and increased rating service fees due to annual scheduled rate increases. 

Station  production  expenses  increased  $24.5  million  during  2011  compared  to  2010.  This  increase  was  primarily  due  to  an 
increase  in  fees  pursuant  to  network  affiliation  agreements,  increased  compensation  expense  (including  amounts  related  to  the 
Four  Points  and  Freedom  stations  pursuant  to  the  LMAs  prior  to  acquisition,  which  were  pass-through  costs),  increased 
promotional  advertising  expenses  and  increased  rating  service  fees  due  to  annual  scheduled  rate  increases.    Additionally,  news 
profit share expenses increased due to better news performance which resulted in higher payments to our news share partners. 

Station selling, general and administrative expenses.  Station selling, general and administrative expenses increased $47.4 million during 
2012 compared to 2011, of which $38.4 million related to the stations acquired in 2012. The remaining increases for the year were 
primarily  due  to  employee  /  management  incentive  bonuses,  an  increase  in  national  sales  commissions  and  increased 
compensation expense.  

Station selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.2 million during 2011 compared to 2010.  This decrease was 
primarily  due  to  lower  non-income  based  tax  expense,  a  decrease  in  stock-based  compensation  and  decreased  national  sales 
agency  and  local  commission  costs.    These  decreases  were  partially  offset  by  an  increase  in  expenses  related  to  rollout  of 
expanded digital product offerings.    

We expect 2013 station production and station selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding barter and full year effect 

on 2012 acquisitions, to trend higher than our 2012 results. 

Amortization of program contract costs and net realizable value adjustments. The amortization of program contract costs increased $8.9 
million during 2012 compared to 2011, of which $7.1 million related to the stations acquired in 2012.  The remaining increases for 
the year are due to more long-term program contracts, which resulted in higher contract cost amortization. 

The amortization of program contract costs decreased $8.8 million during 2011 compared  to 2010.  We had purchased more 

barter and short-term program contracts which are less expensive and resulted in lower contract cost amortization. 

Corporate general and administrative expenses.  See explanation under Corporate and Unallocated Expenses 

Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets.  We completed our annual test of goodwill and broadcast licenses for impairment 
in fourth quarter 2012, 2011 and  2010.   We recorded no impairment in 2012.   During 2011,  we recorded impairments of $0.4 
million related to our broadcast licenses.  During 2010, we recorded impairments of $4.8 million related to our broadcast licenses 
and other assets.   

Depreciation and amortization expenses.  Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of definite-lived intangibles and 
other assets increased $32.9 million during 2012 compared 2011, of which $32.2 million related to the stations acquired in 2012.  

2012 Annual Report  19  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $4.6 million during 2011 compared to 2010.  This decrease was primarily due 
to older assets that were becoming fully depreciated.   

OTHER OPERATING DIVISIONS SEGMENT REVENUE AND EXPENSE 

The following table presents our other operating divisions segment revenue and expenses  which is comprised of the following 
for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions): Triangle Signs & Services, LLC (Triangle), a sign designer 
and  fabricator;  Alarm  Funding  Associates,  LLC.  (Alarm  Funding),  a  regional  security  alarm  operating  and  bulk  acquisition 
company; real estate ventures and other nominal businesses. 

2012 

2011 

2010 

’12 vs. ‘11 

’11 vs. ‘10 

Percent Change 

Revenues: 
Triangle 
Alarm Funding 
Real Estate Ventures and 

other 

Expenses: (a) 
Triangle 
Alarm Funding 
Real Estate Ventures and 

  $  
  $  

26.5 
16.0 

  $  
  $  

23.1 
12.8 

  $  
  $  

19.1 
10.0 

  $ 

11.7 

  $ 

8.6 

  $ 

7.5 

  $  
  $  

25.9 
12.9 

  $  
  $  

21.8 
12.7 

  $  
  $  

19.8 
8.0 

other 

  $ 

17.2 

  $ 

12.3 

  $ 

9.8 

14.7% 
25.0% 

36.0% 

18.8% 
1.6% 

39.8% 

20.9% 
28.0% 

14.7% 

10.1% 
58.8% 

25.5% 

(a)  Comprises  total  expenses  of  the  entity  including  other  operating  divisions  expenses,  depreciation  and  amortization  and  applicable 
other  income  (expense)  items  such  as  interest  expense  and  non-cash  stock-based  compensation  expense  related  to  issuances  of 
subsidiary stock awards. 

The year over year increases in Triangle’s revenue and expenses  during 2012 compared to 2011 and 2011 compared to 2010 
was  primarily  due  to  increases  in  sales  volume  due  to  new  service  contracts.    The  increases  in  Alarm  Funding’s  revenue  and 
expenses  during  2012  compared  to  2011  and  2011  compared  to  2010  was  primarily  due  to  the  acquisition  of  new  alarm 
monitoring contracts.  Revenues and expenses have increased for our consolidated real estate ventures over the same periods due 
to an increase in leasing activity for operating real estate properties and sales of property under development in 2012 compared to 
2011.  As of December 31, 2012, we held $71.7 million of real estate for development and sale. 

Income (loss) from Equity and Cost Method Investments.  As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying value of our investments in 
private equity funds and real estate ventures, accounted for under the equity or cost method, was $27.3 million and $65.9 million 
in 2012 and $26.3 million and $52.6 million in 2011, respectively.  Results of our equity and cost method investments in private 
investment funds and real estate ventures are included in income from equity and cost method investments in our consolidated 
statements  of  operations.    During  2012,  we  recorded  income  of  $2.2  million  related  to  certain  private  investment  funds  and 
income  of  $7.4  million  related  to  our  real  estate  ventures,  including  a  $7.9  million  gain  on  the  sale  of  three  of  our  real  estate 
ventures, partially offset by a $0.9 million impairment charge related to one of our real estate ventures.  During 2011, we recorded 
income  of  $2.3  million  related  to  certain  private  equity  funds  and  income  of  $1.0  million  related  to  our  real  estate  ventures, 
including a $1.1 million gain on sale of one  of  our real estate ventures.  During 2010, we determined three of our investments 
were  impaired,  primarily  due  to  decreases  in  underlying  values  of  our  real  estate  investments,  and  we  recorded  impairments 
totaling  $6.7  million.    Additionally,  during  2010,  we  recorded  losses  of  $1.7  million  related  to  other  real  estate  ventures  and 
income of $3.6 million related to certain private equity funds.   

20  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CORPORATE AND UNALLOCATED EXPENSES 

2012 

2011 

2010 

’12 vs. ‘11 

’11 vs. ‘10 

Percent Change 
(Increase/(Decrease)) 

Corporate general and 

administrative expenses 

Interest expense 
Loss from extinguishment of 

debt 

Income tax provision  

  $ 
  $ 

  $ 
  $ 

2.8 
125.3 

(0.3) 
(67.9) 

  $ 
  $ 

  $ 
  $ 

2.4 
102.4 

(4.8) 
(44.8) 

  $ 
  $ 

  $ 
  $ 

2.2 
114.1 

(6.3) 
(40.2) 

16.7% 
22.4% 

(93.8%) 
51.6% 

9.1% 
(10.3%) 

(23.8%) 
11.4% 

Corporate  general  and  administrative  expenses.    We  allocate  most  of  our  corporate  general  and  administrative  expenses  to  the 
broadcast segment.  The explanation that follows combines corporate general and administrative expenses found in the Broadcast 
Segment  section  with  the  corporate  general  and  administrative  expenses  found  in  this  section,  Corporate and Unallocated Expenses.  
These  results  exclude  general  and  administrative  costs  from  our  other  operating  divisions  segment  which  are  included  in  our 
discussion of expenses in the Other Operating Divisions Segment section. 

Combined corporate general and administrative expenses increased to $31.7 million in 2012 from $27.2 million in 2011.  This is 
primarily due to an increase in transaction costs due to our recent acquisitions, an increase in higher group insurance costs and 
higher employee incentive / performance bonuses. 

Combined corporate general and administrative expenses increased to $27.2 million in 2011 from $25.9 million in 2010.  This is 
primarily  due  to  an  increase  in  employee  bonuses,  stock-based  compensation  from  the  issuance  of  stock-settled  appreciation 
rights and the issuance of restricted and unrestricted common stock at higher stock prices when compared to 2010.  The increases 
were partially offset by lower health and other insurance costs. 

We expect corporate general and administrative expenses to increase in 2013 compared to 2012. 

Interest expense.  Interest expense increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the incremental borrowings on our Term 
Loan  A  and  Term  Loan  B  under  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement  for  our  acquisitions  in  2012,  the  issuance  of  $500.0  million  of 
6.125%  notes  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012,  as  well  as  financing  costs  of  $6.3  million  related  to  the  amendment  of  our  Bank 
Credit  Agreement,  which  were  incurred  in  2012.    The  increase  in  interest  was  partially  offset  by  a  decrease  due  to  the  full 
extinguishment of our 6.0% Notes in the second quarter of 2011.   

Interest expense decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to our amending and restating the Bank Credit Agreement 
in third quarter 2010 and the first quarter 2011, resulting in lower interest rates.  In addition, interest expense decreased due to the 
redemption of our 8.0% Notes in fourth quarter 2010 and  our 6.0% Notes in 2010 and second quarter 2011.  These decreases 
were partially offset by certain financing costs recorded as interest expense during 2011 and 2010 of $6.1 million and $3.6 million, 
respectively, related to the amendments to the Bank Credit Agreement, mentioned previously, as well as the amendment in the 
fourth quarter 2011. 

We expect interest expense to increase in 2013 compared to 2012 due to the acquisition financing.   

Loss from extinguishment of debt.  During the year ended December 31, 2012, we drew down on our incremental borrowings under 
the  Bank  Credit  Agreement  and  wrote  off  a  portion  of  our  deferred  financing  costs  and  debt  discount  on  the  Term  Loan  B, 
resulting in a loss of $0.3 million from extinguishment of debt.   

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we amended our Bank Credit Agreement and paid down a portion of  our Term 
Loan  B,  completed  the  redemption  of  all  $70.0  million  of  the  remaining  6.0%  Notes  and  repurchased  certain  of  our  8.375% 
Notes, resulting in a loss of $4.8 million from extinguishment of debt.   

Income tax (provision) benefit.  The 2012 income tax provision for our pre-tax income from continuing operations (including the 
effects of the noncontrolling interest) of $212.1 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 32.0%.  The 2011 income tax provision 
for our pre-tax income from continuing operations (including the effects of the noncontrolling interest) of $121.0 million resulted 
in an effective tax rate of 37.0%.  The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2011 to 2012 is primarily due to a release of valuation 
allowance of $7.7 million related to certain deferred tax assets of Cunningham, one of our consolidated VIEs, as the weight of all 
available  evidence  supports  realization  of  the  deferred  tax  assets.  The  valuation  allowance  release  determination  was  based 
primarily on the sufficiency of forecasted taxable income necessary to utilize NOLs expiring in years 2022 – 2029.  This VIE files  

2012 Annual Report  21  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
separate income tax returns.   Any resulting tax liabilities are nonrecourse to us and we are not entitled to any benefit resulting 
from the deferred tax assets of the VIE. 

 As of December 31, 2012, we had a net deferred tax liability of $235.4 million (including $1.3 million classified as held for sale) 
as  compared  to  a  net  deferred  tax  liability  of  $242.6  million  as  of  December  31,  2011.    The  decrease  primarily  relates  to  an 
increase  in  deferred  tax  assets  of  Cunningham,  one  of  our  consolidated  VIEs,  primarily  as  a  result  of  a  release  of  valuation 
allowance. 

The 2011 income tax provision for our pre-tax income from continuing operations (including the effects of the noncontrolling 
interest) of $121.0 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.0%.  The 2010 income tax provision for our pre-tax income from 
continuing operations (including the effects of the noncontrolling interest) of $117.0 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 
34.4%.  The increase in the effective tax rate from 2011 to 2010 is primarily due to a $2.3 million tax benefit recorded in 2010, 
predominantly  resulting  from  a  change  in  estimate  related  to  an  increased  deduction  for  the  recovery  of  historical  losses 
attributable to a disposition that took place in 2009.  

As of December 31, 2012, we had $26.0 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits.  Of this total, $15.0 million (net of federal 
effect on state tax issues) and $6.8 million (net of federal effect on state tax issues) represent the amounts of unrecognized tax 
benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect our effective tax rates from continuing operations and discontinued operations, 
respectively.  As of December 31, 2011, we had $26.1 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits.  Of this total, $15.1 million (net 
of  federal  effect  on  state  tax  issues)  and  $6.8  million  (net  of  federal  effect  on  state  tax  issues)  represent  the  amounts  of 
unrecognized  tax  benefits  that,  if  recognized,  would  favorably  affect  our  effective  tax  rates  from  continuing  operations  and 
discontinued operations, respectively. We recognized $1.5 million and $1.3 million of income tax expense for interest related to 
uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  See  Note 9. Income Taxes in the Notes to 
our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 

As  of  December  31,  2012,  we  had  $22.9  million  in  cash  and  cash  equivalent  balances  and  net  negative  working  capital  of 
approximately $3.2 million.  Cash generated by our operations and borrowing capacity under the Bank Credit Agreement are used 
as our primary source of  liquidity.   As of  December  31, 2012, we  had  $49.5 million of  borrowing capacity available and  $48.0 
million  drawn  on  our  Revolving  Credit  Facility.      We  anticipate  that  existing  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  cash  flow  from  our 
operations and borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility and general uncommitted incremental term loan capacity 
of $500.0 million under our Bank Credit Agreement will be sufficient to satisfy our debt service obligations, capital expenditure 
requirements and working capital needs for the next twelve months.  For our long-term liquidity needs, in addition to the sources 
described above, we may rely upon the issuance of long-term debt, the issuance of equity or other instruments convertible into or 
exchangeable for equity, or the sale of non-core assets.  However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital or 
buyers of our non-core assets will be available, or that the terms of any transactions will be acceptable or advantageous to us.   

We drew $180.0 million of the additional term loans to fund the acquisition of assets of Four Points, which closed in January 
2012 and drew $350.0 million of  the additional term loans to fund the acquisition of  assets of  Freedom, which closed in April 
2012.  

On  September  20,  2012,  we  entered  into  an  amendment  (the  Amendment)  of  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement.  Under  the 
Amendment, we increased our incremental term loan capacity from $300.0 million to $500.0 million. Also under the Amendment, 
the level of permitted unsecured indebtedness increased from $450.0 million to $850.0 million, subject to certain limitations, and 
increased our ratio of our First Lien Indebtedness from 3.25 times EBITDA to 3.75 times EBITDA through December 31, 2014 
with  a  decrease  to  3.50  times  EBITDA  through  maturity  of  the  agreement.  Other  amended  terms  provided  us  with  increased 
television station acquisition capacity, more flexibility under the other restrictive covenants and prepayments of the existing term 
loans. There were no changes pertaining to interest rates or maturities of the outstanding debt or commitments under the Bank 
Credit Agreement.  

On October 12, 2012, we issued $500.0 million of Senior Unsecured Notes due on October 1, 2022, pursuant to an indenture 
(the  Indenture)  dated  October  12,  2012.    The  Notes  were  priced at  100%  of  their  par  value  and  will  bear  interest  at  a  rate  of 
6.125% per annum payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, commencing on April 1, 2013. Prior to October 1, 2017, we 
may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount  of 
the  Notes  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest,  if  any,  to  the  redemption  date,  plus  a  “make-whole”  premium  as  set  forth  in  the 
Indenture.    Beginning  on  October  1,  2017,  we  may  redeem  some  or  all  of  the  Notes  at  any  time  or  from  time  to  time  at  a 
redemption price set forth in the Indenture.  In addition, on or prior to October 1, 2015, we may redeem up to 35% of the Notes 
using proceeds of certain equity offerings.  We used part of the proceeds of this offering to finance the acquisitions in the fourth  

22  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
quarter, as described under the Executive Overview, including the acquisition of certain television stations from Newport. We used 
the remaining proceeds of this offering to partially fund the special dividend paid in December.   

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions): 

Net cash flows from operating activities 

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities: 
Acquisition of property and equipment 
Acquisition of television stations 
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash 
Dividends and distributions from equity and cost 

method investees 

Purchase of alarm monitoring contracts 
Investments in equity and cost method investees 
Other 

Net cash flows (used in) from investing activities 

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities: 
Proceeds from notes payable, commercial bank 

financing and capital leases 

Repayments of notes payable, commercial bank 

financing and capital leases 

Payments for deferred financing costs 
Dividends paid on Class A and Class B Common 

Stock 

Other 

$ 

$ 

2012 
237.5 

(44.0) 
(1,135.3) 
58.5 

9.6 
(12.5) 
(24.1) 
(1.5) 
$ (1,149.3) 

2011 
148.5 

(35.8) 
— 
(53.4) 

3.8 
(8.9) 
(11.6) 
(6.3) 
(112.2) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2010 
155.0 

(11.7) 
— 
59.6 

0.9 
(10.1) 
(7.2) 
0.4 
31.9 

$ 

$ 

$ 

  $  1,247.2 

  $ 

151.7 

  $ 

283.9 

(179.3) 
(18.7) 

(123.9) 
(3.6) 
921.7 

(150.4) 
(5.5) 

(38.4) 
(2.7) 
(45.3) 

$ 

(427.4) 
(7.0) 

(34.2) 
(3.4) 
(188.1) 

$ 

Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities 

$ 

Net cash flows from operating activities increased during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 
2011.  During 2012, we received more cash receipts from customers, net of cash payments to vendors, partially offset by higher 
interest and  tax  payments and the $25.0 million  payments  to FOX  pursuant to the agreements entered into during the second 
quarter of 2012. 

Net cash flows from operating activities decreased during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 
2010.  During 2011, we received less cash receipts from customers, net of cash payments to vendors, in addition to other negative 
working capital changes,  which was partially  offset by lower interest and program  payments.  Additionally, we received net tax 
refunds in 2010 compared to net cash taxes paid in 2011. 

We expect both interest expense and program payments to increase in 2013 compared to 2012.  

Net cash flows used in investing activities increased during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 
2011. This increase is due to $1,135.3 million in payments for acquisitions of television stations, additional investment in equity 
investees, higher capital expenditures and the purchases of alarm monitoring contracts. This increase was  partially offset by the 
use of the restricted cash held in escrow for our acquisitions and distributions received upon sale of three of our equity method 
investments during 2012.    

With  the  exception  of  changes  in  restricted  cash,  net  cash  flows  used  in  investing  activities  increased  during  the  year  ended 
December 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  During 2011, we had higher capital expenditures primarily for news 
operations and upgrades to our master control systems in order to upgrade these operations to HD.  Additionally, we made more  
investments  in  our  other  operating  divisions.    Restricted  cash  increased  due  to  amounts  required  to  be  deposited  in  escrow 
accounts pursuant to the asset purchase agreements with Four Points and Freedom.   

In 2013, we anticipate incurring fewer capital expenditures than incurred in 2012. 

2012 Annual Report  23  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash flows from financing activities increased during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 
2011.  During 2012,  we drew  $530.0 million of  incremental  term loans to fund the asset acquisitions of  both Four Points and 
Freedom, which closed in January 2012 and April 2012, respectively.  We also issued $500.0 million of Senior Unsecured Notes 
and used the proceeds to fund the acquisitions in the fourth quarter. This was slightly offset by higher stock dividends paid in 
2012 totaling $1.54 per share, which included the $1.00 per share special dividend paid in December, versus $0.48 per share in 
2011, as well as, $13.2 million more in payments for deferred financing costs related to the incremental borrowings in 2012. 

Net cash flows used in financing activities decreased during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period 
in 2010.  During 2011, we amended our Bank Credit Agreement resulting in a new Term Loan A of $115.0 million and reducing 
our Term Loan B by $45.0 million.  Additionally, we completed the redemption of the remaining $70.0 million of the 6.0% Notes 
at 100% of the face value of such notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The redemption of the 6.0% Notes was effected in 
accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 6.0% Notes and was funded from the net proceeds of our new Term 
Loan  A.  During  2010,  we  purchased  $117.7  million  principal  amount  of  our  3.0%  Notes,  4.87%%  Notes  and  6.0%  Notes 
pursuant  to  a  combination  of  tender  offers,  put  rights  and  open  market  purchases.  In  addition,  we  fully  extinguished  the 
outstanding $224.7 million principal amount of 8.0% Notes.  

From  time  to  time,  we  may  repurchase  additional  outstanding  debt  and  stock  on  the  open  market.    We  expect  to  fund  any 

repurchases with cash generated from operating activities and in some cases, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.   

During 2011, our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends on common stock, of $0.12 per share. Dividends of $0.12 
per share were paid in March 2011, June 2011, September 2011 and December 2011, for total dividend payments of $0.48 per 
share for the year ended December 31, 2011.   During 2012, our Board of  Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per 
share in the months of February and May, which were paid in March and June, and $0.15 per share in the months of August and 
November,  which  were  paid  in  September  and  December.    A  special  cash  dividend  of  $1.00  per  share  was  also  declared  in 
November 2012, which was paid in December, for total dividend payments of $1.54 per share for the year ended December 31, 
2012.  In  February  2013,  our  Board  of  Directors  declared  a  quarterly  dividend  of  $0.15  per  share.    Future  dividends  on  our 
common shares, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on several factors including our results 
of  operations,  cash  requirements  and  surplus,  financial  condition,  covenant  restrictions  and  other  factors  that  the  Board  of 
Directors may deem relevant.  The Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock holders have the same rights related to 
dividends.  Under our Bank Credit Agreement, in certain circumstances we may make up to $100.0 million in unrestricted annual 
cash payments including but not limited to dividends, of which $50.0 million may carry over to the next year. 

24  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
We have various contractual obligations which are recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Other items, 
such as certain purchase commitments and other executory contracts are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial  
statements  but are required to be disclosed.  For example, we are contractually committed to acquire future programming and 
make certain minimum lease payments for the use of property under operating lease agreements.   

The following table reflects a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2012 and the future periods in 

which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash (in millions): 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO CONTINUING OPERATIONS (a) 

Total 

2013 

2014-2015 

2016-2017 

2018 and 
thereafter (b) 

Notes payable, capital leases and 

commercial bank financing (c), (d) 

$   

2,954.5 

$   

150.0 

$   

305.0 

$ 

1,519.0 

$  

980.5 

Notes and capital leases payable to 

affiliates (c) 
Operating leases 
Employment contracts 
Program content (e) 
Programming services (f) 
Maintenance and support 
Other operating contracts 
LMA and outsourcing agreements (g) 
Investments and loan commitments (h) 
Total contractual cash obligations 

33.1 
24.8 
20.2 
752.7 
93.6 
9.2 
10.0 
0.2 
8.9 
3,907.2 

$ 

4.2 
4.7 
11.5 
191.9 
40.1 
2.4 
0.7 
0.1 
8.9 
414.5 

$   

8.6 
8.3 
8.2 
301.4 
26.0 
3.4 
1.3 
0.1 
— 
662.3 

$ 

7.9 
7.5 
0.5 
241.3 
19.2 
3.4 
1.4 
— 
— 
1,800.2 

$   

12.4 
4.3 
— 
18.1 
8.3 
— 
6.6 
— 
— 
1,030.2 

$   

(a)  Excluded  from  this  table  are  $26.0  million  of  accrued  unrecognized  tax  benefits.    Due  to  inherent  uncertainty,  we  can  not  make 

reasonable estimates of the amount and period payments will be made. 

(b)  Includes  a  one-year  estimate  of  $8.3  million  in  payments  related  to  contracts  that  automatically  renew.    We  have  not  calculated 

potential payments for years after 2018. 

(c) 

Includes  interest  on  fixed  rate  debt  and  capital  leases.    Estimated  interest  on  our  recourse  variable  rate  debt  has  been  excluded.  
Recourse variable rate debt represents $899.5 million of our $2.3 billion total face value of debt as of December 31, 2012.   

(d)  During 2012, we drew $530.0 million of incremental term loans to fund the asset acquisitions of both the Four Points and Freedom 
stations. Additionally, we issued a private offering of $500.0 million of 6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes to fund the asset acquisition 
of the Newport stations and other acquisitions.  As of December 31, 2012, we drew $48.0 million on our revolver.  Included in these 
amounts is debt borrowed by Deerfield which is guaranteed by SBG and totals $20.0 million as of December 31, 2012. 

(e)  Our  Program  content  includes  contractual  amounts  owed  through  the  expiration  date  of  the  underlying  agreement  for  active  and 
future program contracts, network programming and additional advertising inventory in various dayparts. Active program contracts 
are  included  in  the  balance  sheet  as  an  asset  and  liability  while  future  program  contracts  are  excluded  until  the  cost  is  known,  the 
program is available for its first showing or telecast and the licensee has accepted the program.  Industry protocol typically enables us 
to make payments for program contracts on a three-month lag, which differs from the contractual timing within the table.  Network 
programming agreements may include variable fee components such as subscriber levels, which in certain circumstances have been 
estimated and reflected in the table.  

(f) 

Includes obligations related to rating service fees, music license fees, market research, weather and news services.    

(g)  Excluded  from  the  table  are  estimated  amounts  due  pursuant  to  LMAs  and  outsourcing  agreements  where  we  consolidate  the 
counterparty.  The  fees  that  we  are  required  to  pay  under  these  agreements  total  $5.8  million,  $11.5  million,  $3.5  million  and  $1.6 
million for the periods 2013, 2014-2015, 2016-2017 and 2018 and thereafter, respectively. Certain station related operating expenses 
are  paid  by  the  licensee  and  reimbursed  by  us  under  the  LMA  agreements.  Certain  of  these  expenses  that  are  in  connection  with 
contracts are included in table above.    

(h)  Commitments to contribute capital or provide loans to Allegiance Capital, LP, Sterling Ventures Partners, LP and Patriot Capital II, 

LP. 

Off balance sheet arrangements as defined by the SEC means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to 

2012 Annual Report  25  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
which an entity unconsolidated with the registrant is a party, under which the registrant has:  obligations under certain guarantees 
or contracts; retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangements; obligations 
under certain derivative arrangements; and obligations arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity. As of 
December 31, 2012, we do not have any material off balance sheet arrangements. 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates.  At times we enter into derivative instruments primarily for the 
purpose  of  reducing  the  impact  of  changing  interest  rates  on  our  floating  rate  debt  and  to  reduce  the  impact  of  changing  fair 
market  values  on  our fixed  rate  debt.   See  Note 6. Notes Payable and Commercial Bank Financing, in  the  Notes  to  our  Consolidated 
Financial Statements.  As of December 31, 2012, we did not have any outstanding derivative instruments. 

In January 2012, we drew $180.0 million of the incremental Term Loan B under our Bank Credit Agreement to fund the asset 
acquisition of Four Points, which closed January 1, 2012. In addition, in April 2012, we drew $157.5 million of the incremental 
Term Loan A and $192.5 million of the incremental Term Loan B under our Bank Credit Agreement to fund the asset acquisition 
of Freedom, which closed April 1, 2012.  As of December 31, 2012, we had $48.0 million drawn on our revolver. 

On September 20, 2012, we entered into an amendment of our Bank Credit Agreement. Under the Amendment, we increased 
our  incremental  term  loan  capacity  from  $300.0  million  to  $500.0  million.  Also  under  the  Amendment,  the  level  of  permitted 
unsecured indebtedness increased from $450.0 million to $850.0 million, subject to certain limitations, and we increased our  ratio 
of our First Lien Indebtedness from 3.25 times EBITDA to 3.75 times EBITDA through December 31, 2014 with a decrease to 
3.50  times  EBITDA  through  maturity  of  the  agreement.  Other  amended  terms  provided  us  with  increased  television  station 
acquisition capacity, more flexibility under the other restrictive covenants and prepayments of the existing term loans. There were 
no changes pertaining to interest rates or maturities of the outstanding debt or commitments under the Bank Credit Agreement. 

We are exposed to risk from a change in interest rates to the extent we are required to refinance existing fixed rate indebtedness 
at rates higher than those prevailing at the time the existing indebtedness was incurred.  The  carrying value and fair value of the 
4.875% Notes, 3.0% Notes, 6.125% Notes, 8.375% Notes and 9.25% Notes combined was $1,236.5 million and $1,362.6 million, 
respectively, as of December 31, 2012.  We estimate that adding 1.0% to prevailing interest rates would result in a decrease in fair 
value of these notes by $70.7 million as of December 31, 2012.  Generally, the fair market value of these notes will decrease as 
interest rates rise and increase as interest rates fall.  We are also exposed to risk from the changing interest rates of our variable 
rate debt, primarily related to our Bank Credit Agreement.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, cash interest expense on our 
term loans and revolver related to our Bank Credit Agreement was $27.9 million.   We estimate that adding 1.0% to respective 
interest rates would result in an increase in our interest expense of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.  We also 
have variable rate debt associated with our other operating divisions.  We estimate that adding 1.0% to respective interest rates 
would result in $0.6 million of additional interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

Under certain circumstances, we have contingent cash interest features related to the 3.0% Notes and the 4.875% Notes.  The 

contingent cash interest feature for both issuances were embedded derivatives which have negligible fair values.   

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

Our  Class  A  Common  Stock  is  listed  for  trading  on  the  NASDAQ  stock  market  under  the  symbol  SBGI.    Our  Class  B 
Common  Stock  is  not  traded  on  a  public  trading  market  or  quotation  system.    The  following  tables  set  forth  for  the  periods 
indicated the high and low closing sales prices on the NASDAQ stock market for our Class A Common Stock.    

2012 
First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter 
Fourth Quarter 

2011 
First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter 
Fourth Quarter 

High 

12.95 
11.33 
12.56 
12.92 

High 

13.00 
12.70 
11.16 
11.50 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

Low 

11.06 
7.92 
9.41 
10.39 

Low 

7.82 
9.24 
6.90 
6.95 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 

26  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As  of  March  1,  2013,  there  were  approximately  101  shareholders  of  record  of  our  common  stock.    This  number  does  not 

include beneficial owners holding shares through nominee names.   

During 2011, our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends on common stock, of $0.12 per share. Dividends of $0.12 
per share were paid in March 2011, June 2011, September 2011 and December 2011, for total dividend payments of $0.48 per 
share for the year ended December 31, 2011.   During 2012, our Board of  Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per 
share in the months of February and May, which were paid in March and June, and $0.15 per share in the months of August and 
November,  which  were  paid  in  September  and  December.    A  special  cash  dividend  of  $1.00  per  share  was  also  declared  in 
November 2012, which was paid in December, for total dividend payments of $1.54 per share for the year ended December 31, 
2012.    In  February  2013,  our  Board  of  Directors  declared  a  quarterly  dividend  of  $0.15  per  share.    Future  dividends  on  our 
common shares, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on several factors including our results 
of  operations,  cash  requirements  and  surplus,  financial  condition,  covenant  restrictions  and  other  factors  that  the  Board  of 
Directors may deem relevant.  The Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock holders have the same rights related to 
dividends.  Under our Bank Credit Agreement, in certain circumstances, we may make up to $100.0 million in unrestricted annual 
cash  payments  including  but  not  limited  to  dividends,  of  which  $50.0  million  may  carry  over  to  the  next  year.    Under  the 
indentures  governing  our  9.25%  Second  Lien  Notes,  due  2017  (the  9.25%  Notes),  our  8.375%  Senior  Notes,  due  2018  (the 
8.375% Notes) and our 6.125% Notes, due 2022 (the 6.125% Notes), we are restricted from paying dividends on our common 
stock unless certain specified conditions are satisfied, including that:  

 

 

no  event  of  default  then  exists  under  each  indenture  or  certain  other  specified  agreements  relating  to  our 
indebtedness; and 
after taking account of the dividends payment, we are within certain restricted payment requirements contained in 
each indenture. 

In addition, under certain of our debt instruments, the payment of dividends is not permissible during a default thereunder. 

During 2012, we did not repurchase any shares of Class A Common Stock or other equity securities of Sinclair. 

The  following  line  graph  compares  the  yearly  percentage  change  in  the  cumulative  total  shareholder  return  on  our  Class  A 
Common  Stock  with  the  cumulative  total  return  of  the  NASDAQ  Composite  Index  and  the  cumulative  total  return  of  the 
NASDAQ Telecommunications Index (an index containing performance data of radio and television broadcast companies and 
communication  equipment  and  accessories  manufacturers)  from  December  31,  2007  through  December  31,  2012.  The 
performance graph assumes that an investment of $100 was made in the Class A Common Stock and in each Index on December 
31,  2007  and  that  all  dividends  were  reinvested.    Total  shareholder  return  is  measured  by  dividing  total  dividends  (assuming 
dividend reinvestment) plus share price change for a period by the share price at the beginning of the measurement period. 

Company/Index/Market 
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. 
NASDAQ Telecommunications 

Index 

NASDAQ Composite Index 

12/31/07 
100.00 

12/31/08 
44.09 

12/31/09 
57.32 

12/31/10 
122.61 

12/31/11 
178.44 

12/31/12 
228.35 

100.00 
100.00 

59.03 
57.58 

82.25 
72.97 

97.32 
86.05 

98.63 
90.30 

110.78 
89.62 

2012 Annual Report  27  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, 
evaluated the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting 
as of December 31, 2012.   

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means 
controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be 
disclosed by a company  in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and 
reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without 
limitation,  controls  and  procedures  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  information  required  to  be  disclosed  by  a 
company  in  the  reports  that  it  files  or  submits  under  the  Exchange  Act  is  accumulated  and  communicated  to  the  our 
management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding 
required disclosure.  Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can 
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the 
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.   

28  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
The  term  “internal  control  over  financial  reporting,”  as  defined  in  Rules  13a-15d-15(f)  under  the  Exchange  Act,  means  a 
process designed by, or under the supervision of our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers and effected by our Board of 
Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial  reporting and 
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) 
and includes those policies and procedures that: 

 

 

 

pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that  in  reasonable  detail  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and 
dispositions of our assets; 
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements 
in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of 
management or our Board of Directors; and  
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition 
of our assets that could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. 

Based  on the evaluation  of  our disclosure controls and  procedures as of December  31, 2012, our Chief  Executive Officer and 
Chief  Financial  Officer  concluded  that,  as  of  such  date,  our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were  effective  at  the  reasonable 
assurance level. 

Our  management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  internal  control  over  financial  reporting.    Under  the 
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,  we 
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria set forth in 
Internal  Control  -  Integrated  Framework  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission 
(COSO).  Based on our assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial 
reporting was effective based on those criteria.  

Management has excluded the operations of the fourth quarter acquisitions including WKRC-TV, WOAI-TV, WHP-TV, WPMI-
TV,  WJTC-TV,  KSAS-TV,  WHAM-TV,  WLYH-TV,  KMTW-TV,  KBTV-TV,  WRSP-TV,  WCCU-TV  and  WBUI-TV,  from  its 
assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. These assets acquired represent $514.8 million of 
total assets as of December 31, 2012 and $12.3 million of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

The  effectiveness  of  our  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2012  has  been  audited  by 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under 
the  Exchange  Act)  during  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2012,  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to 
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and 
procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well 
designed  and  operated,  can  provide  only  reasonable,  not  absolute,  assurance  that  the  objectives  of  the  control  system  are  met.  
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be 
considered relative to their costs.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide 
absolute assurance that all control issues and  instances  of fraud, if any,  within  our company  have  been detected.   These inherent 
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple 
error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or  more 
people,  or  by  management’s  override  of  the  control.    The  design  of  any  system  of  controls  also  is  based  in  part  upon  certain 
assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated 
goals  under  all  potential  future  conditions;  over  time,  controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  the 
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control 
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. 

2012 Annual Report  29  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 

As of December 31, 
ASSETS 
CURRENT ASSETS: 

2012 

2011 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,091 and 

$   

22,865 

$   

12,967 

$3,008, respectively 

Affiliate receivable 
Income taxes receivable 
Current portion of program contract costs 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Assets held for sale 
Deferred barter costs 
Deferred tax assets 

Total current assets 

PROGRAM CONTRACT COSTS, less current portion 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 
RESTRICTED CASH  
GOODWILL 
BROADCAST LICENSES 
DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net 
OTHER ASSETS 

Total assets (a) 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) 
CURRENT LIABILITIES: 

Accounts payable 
Accrued liabilities 
Income taxes payable 
Current portion of notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing 
Current portion of notes payable and capital leases payable to affiliates 
Current portion of program contracts payable 
Liabilities held for sale 
Deferred barter revenues 
Deferred tax liabilities 

Total current liabilities 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: 

Notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing, less current portion 
Notes payable and capital leases to affiliates, less current portion 
Program contracts payable, less current portion 
Deferred tax liabilities 
Other long-term liabilities 

Total liabilities (a) 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 10) 
EQUITY (DEFICIT): 

SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT): 
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 

52,332,012 and 52,022,086 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  

Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, 140,000,000 shares authorized, 

28,933,859 and 28,933,859 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, 
convertible into Class A Common Stock 

Additional paid-in capital 
Accumulated deficit 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 

Total Sinclair Broadcast Group shareholders’ deficit 

Noncontrolling interests 

Total deficit 
Total liabilities and equity (deficit) 

$   

$   

183,480 
416 
— 
56,581 
7,404 
30,357 
3,345 
— 
304,448 
12,767 
439,713 
225 
1,074,032 
85,122 
623,406 
189,984 
2,729,697 

10,086 
143,731 
9,939 
47,622 
1,704 
88,015 
2,397 
3,499 
607 
307,600 

2,210,866 
13,187 
16,341 
233,465 
48,291 
2,829,750 

$   

$   

132,915 
252 
225 
38,906 
17,274 
— 
2,238 
4,940 
209,717 
15,584 
281,521 
58,726 
660,117 
47,002 
175,341 
123,409 
1,571,417 

8,872 
79,698 
— 
38,195 
3,014 
63,825 
— 
1,978 
— 
195,582 

1,148,271 
16,545 
27,625 
247,552 
47,204 
1,682,779 

523 

520 

289 
600,928 
(713,697) 
(4,993) 
(116,950) 
16,897 
(100,053) 
2,729,697 

$   

289 
617,375 
(734,511) 
(4,848) 
(121,175) 
9,813 
(111,362) 
1,571,417 

$   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

(a)  Our consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 include total assets of variable interest entities (VIEs) of $107.9 million 
and  $33.5  million,  respectively,  which  can  only  be  used  to  settle  the  obligations  of  the  VIEs.    Our  consolidated  total  liabilities  as  of 
December 31, 2012 and 2011 include total liabilities of the VIEs of $7.9 million and $14.4 million, respectively, for which the creditors of 
the VIEs have no recourse to us.  See Note 1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. 

30  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands, except per share data) 

REVENUES: 

Station broadcast revenues, net of agency commissions 
Revenues realized from station barter arrangements 
Other operating divisions revenues 

Total revenues 

2012 

2011 

2010 

$   920,593 
86,905 
54,181 
1,061,679 

$   648,002 
72,773 
44,513 
765,288 

$   655,836 
75,210 
36,598 
767,644 

OPERATING EXPENSES: 

Station production expenses 
Station selling, general and administrative expenses 
Expenses recognized from station barter arrangements 
Amortization of program contract costs and net realizable value adjustments 
Other operating divisions expenses 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Corporate general and administrative expenses 
Amortization of definite-lived intangible and other assets  
Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets 

Total operating expenses 
Operating income  

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): 

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount and deferred financing 

costs 

Loss from extinguishment of debt 
Income (loss) from equity and cost method investments 
Gain on insurance settlement 
Other income, net 

Total other expense  
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes 

INCOME TAX PROVISION 

Income from continuing operations 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, includes income tax provision 

of $663, $477 and $77, respectively 

NET INCOME  

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP 
Dividends declared per share 
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO SINCLAIR 

BROADCAST GROUP: 
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations 
Basic earnings per share 
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations 
Diluted earnings per share 
Weighted average common shares outstanding 
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 

$  
$  

$  
$  
$  
$  

255,556 
171,279 
79,834 
60,990 
46,179 
47,073 
33,391 
38,099 
— 
732,401 
329,278 

(128,553) 
(335) 
9,670 
47 
2,233 
(116,938) 
212,340 
(67,852) 
144,488 

465 
144,953 
(287) 
144,666 
1.54 

1.78 
1.79 
1.78 
1.78 
81,020 
81,310 

178,612 
123,938 
65,742 
52,079 
39,486 
32,874 
28,310 
18,229 
398 
539,668 
225,620 

(106,128) 
(4,847) 
3,269 
1,742 
1,717 
(104,247) 
121,373 
(44,785) 
76,588 

(411) 
76,177 
(379) 
75,798 
0.48 

0.95 
0.94 
0.95 
0.94 
80,217 
80,532 

$  
$  

$  
$  
$  
$  

154,133 
127,091 
67,083 
60,862 
30,916 
36,307 
26,800 
18,834 
4,803 
526,829 
240,815 

(116,046) 
(6,266) 
(4,861) 
344 
1,865 
(124,964) 
115,851 
(40,226) 
75,625 

$   
$   

$  
  $  
  $  
  $  

(577) 
75,048 
1,100 
76,148 

0.43     

0.96 
0.95 
0.95 
0.94 
80,245 
83,606 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP 

COMMON SHAREHOLDERS: 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 

Net income  

$  

$  

144,201 
465 
144,666 

$  

$  

76,209 
(411) 
75,798 

  $  

  $  

76,725 
(577) 
76,148 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

2012 Annual Report  31  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands) 

2012 

2011 

2010 

Net income 
Amortization of net periodic pension benefit 

costs, net of taxes 
Comprehensive income 
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to 

the noncontrolling interests 

Comprehensive income attributable to Sinclair 

Broadcast Group 

$ 

144,953 

$ 

76,177 

$ 

75,048 

(145) 
144,808 

(287) 

(934) 
75,243 

(379) 

299 
75,347 

1,100 

$  

144,521 

$  

74,864 

$ 

  76,447 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

32  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT)  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands, except share data) 

BALANCE, 
December 31, 2009 

Dividends declared on Class 
A and Class B Common 
Stock 

Class A Common Stock 
issued pursuant to 
employee benefit plans  

Class B Common Stock 

converted into Class A 
Common Stock 

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests 
Tax provision on employee 

stock awards 

Change in pension funded 

status and amortization of 
net periodic pension 
benefit costs, net of taxes 

Net income (loss) 

BALANCE,  
December 31, 2010 

Sinclair Broadcast Group Shareholders 

Class A  
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Class B 
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Additional 
Paid-In  
Capital 

Accumulated  
Deficit 

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive  
Loss 

Non-
controlling  
Interests 

Total 
Equity  
(Deficit) 

47,375,437 

$   474 

32,453,859 

$   325 

$    605,340 

$ 

(813,876) 

$  

(4,213) 

$   9,728 

$ (202,222) 

— 

— 

538,575 

5 

— 

— 

— 

— 

2,370,040 

— 

— 

— 
— 

24 

— 

— 

— 
— 

(2,370,040) 

(24) 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

(34,225) 

4,423 

— 

— 

(123) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

(287) 

— 

(34,225) 

4,428 

— 

(287) 

(123) 

— 
— 

— 
76,148 

299 
— 

— 
(1,100) 

299 
75,048 

  50,284,052 

$  503 

30,083,819 

$  301 

$ 

609,640 

$ 

(771,953) 

$ 

(3,914) 

$ 

8,341 

$(157,082) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

2012 Annual Report  33  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT)  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands, except share data) 

BALANCE, 
December 31, 2010 

Dividends declared on Class 
A and Class B Common 
Stock 

Class A Common Stock 
issued pursuant to 
employee benefit plans  

Class B Common Stock 

converted into Class A 
Common Stock 

Class A Common Stock sold 
by variable interest entity 

6% Notes converted into 

Class A Common Stock 
Tax benefit on share based 

awards 

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests 
Issuance of subsidiary share 

awards 

Purchase of subsidiary shares 

from noncontrolling 
interests 

Amortization of net periodic 
pension benefit costs, net 
of taxes 
Net income 

BALANCE,  
December 31, 2011 

Sinclair Broadcast Group Shareholders 

Class A  
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Class B 
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Additional 
Paid-In  
Capital 

Accumulated  
Deficit 

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive  
Loss 

Non-
controlling  
Interests 

Total 
Equity  
(Deficit) 

50,284,052 

$   503 

30,083,819 

$   301 

$    609,640 

$ 

(771,953) 

$  

(3,914) 

$   8,341 

$ (157,082) 

— 

— 

586,759 

5 

— 

— 

— 

— 

1,149,960 

12 

(1,149,960) 

(12) 

— 

1,315 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

5,826 

— 

1,808 

30 

734 

— 

— 

(663) 

— 
— 

— 

(38,356) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

(270) 

3,201 

(38,356) 

5,831 

— 

1,808 

30 

734 

(270) 

3,201 

(1,838) 

(2,501) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

52,022,086 

$  520 

28,933,859 

$  289 

$ 

617,375 

$ 

(734,511) 

$ 

(4,848) 

$ 

9,813 

$(111,362) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

— 
75,798 

(934) 
— 

— 
379 

(934) 
76,177 

34  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT)  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands, except share data) 

BALANCE, 
December 31, 2011 

Dividends declared on 
Class A and Class B 
Common Stock 
Class A Common Stock 
issued pursuant to 
employee benefit plans  

Purchase of assets from 
entity under common 
control 

Tax benefit on share based 

awards 

Distributions to 

noncontrolling interests 
Issuance of subsidiary share 

awards 

Consolidation of variable 

interest entity 

Purchase of subsidiary 

shares from 
noncontrolling interests 

Amortization of net 

periodic pension benefit 
costs, net of taxes 

Net income 

BALANCE,  
December 31, 2012 

Sinclair Broadcast Group Shareholders 

Class A  
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Class B 
Common Stock 
Shares 

Value 

Additional 
Paid-In  
Capital 

Accumulated  
Deficit 

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive  
Loss 

Non-
controlling  
Interests 

Total 
Equity  
(Deficit) 

52,022,086 

$   520 

28,933,859 

$   289 

$    617,375 

$ 

(734,511) 

$  

(4,848) 

$   9,813 

$ (111,362) 

— 

(123,852) 

— 

— 

309,926 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

3 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

5,102 

(23,638) 

271 

— 

— 

— 

1,818 

— 
— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

(123,852) 

5,105 

(23,638) 

271 

(1,142) 

(1,142) 

707 

9,050 

707 

9,050 

(1,818) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
144,666 

(145) 
— 

— 
287 

(145) 
144,953 

52,332,012 

$  523 

28,933,859 

$  289 

$ 

600,928 

$ 

(713,697) 

$ 

(4,993) 

$  16,897 

$(100,053) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

2012 Annual Report  35  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 
(In thousands) 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: 

Net income  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: 

Amortization of debt discount, net of debt premium 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets  
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets  
Amortization of program contract costs and net realizable value adjustments 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, non-cash portion 
Original debt issuance discount paid 
Deferred tax provision 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions: 

Increase in accounts receivable, net 
Decrease in income taxes receivable 
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets 
(Increase) decrease in other assets  
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable 
(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities 

Payments on program contracts payable 
Other, net 

Net cash flows from operating activities 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 

Acquisition of property and equipment 
Payments for acquisitions of television stations 
Purchase of alarm monitoring contracts 
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash 
Distributions from equity and cost method investees 
Investments in equity and cost method investees 
Investment in debt securities 
Payments for acquisitions of assets of other operating divisions 
Proceeds from the sale of assets 
Proceeds from insurance settlements 
Loans to affiliates 
Proceeds from loans to affiliates 

Net cash flows (used in) from investing activities 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 

Proceeds from notes payable, commercial bank financing and capital leases 
Repayments of notes payable, commercial bank financing and capital leases  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including excess tax benefits of share based 

payments of $0.3 million, $0.7 million and $0 million, respectively  

Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests 
Dividends paid on Class A and Class B Common Stock 
Payments for deferred financing costs 
Proceeds from Class A Common Stock sold by variable interest entity 
Noncontrolling interests distributions 
Repayments of notes and capital leases to affiliates 

Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year 

$ 

2012 

2011 

2010 

$ 

144,953 

$ 

76,177 

$ 

75,048 

3,469 
48,871 
— 
38,671 
61,943 
335 
— 
8,313 

(23,225) 
— 
(8,360) 
(23,200) 
35,885 
9,150 
(3,941) 
(70,061) 
14,672 
237,475 

(43,986) 
(1,135,348) 
(12,454) 
58,501 
9,590 
(24,052) 
(1,493) 
— 
10 
42 
(277) 
183 
(1,149,284) 

1,247,255 
(179,356) 

391 
— 
(123,852) 
(18,707) 
— 
(1,142) 
(2,882) 
921,707 
9,898 
12,967 
22,865 

3,347 
33,153 
398 
18,229 
52,079 
4,985 
(13,785) 
43,972 

(11,616) 
74 
(10,449) 
(1,247) 
8,878 
(780) 
913 
(67,319) 
11,504 
148,513 

(35,835) 
— 
(8,850) 
(53,445) 
3,798 
(11,577) 
(4,911) 
(3,072) 
69 
1,739 
(406) 
242 
(112,248) 

151,733 
(150,447) 

1,794 
(2,501) 
(38,356) 
(5,483) 
1,808 
(610) 
(3,210) 
(45,272) 
(9,007) 
21,974 
12,967 

$ 

4,963 
36,563 
4,803 
18,834 
60,862 
5,525 
(14,393) 
38,636 

(14,491) 
8,073 
196 
393 
9,928 
298 
(3,464) 
(88,992) 
12,179 
154,961 

(11,694) 
— 
(10,106) 
59,602 
894 
(7,224) 
— 
— 
110 
372 
(136) 
117 
31,935 

283,930 
(427,421) 

— 
— 
(34,225) 
(7,020) 
— 
(287) 
(3,123) 
(188,146) 
(1,250) 
23,224 
21,974 

$ 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

36  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

1.  NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: 

Sinclair  Broadcast  Group,  Inc.  is  a  diversified  television  broadcasting  company  that  owns  or  provides  certain  programming, 
operating or sales services to television stations pursuant to broadcasting licenses that are granted by the Federal Communication 
Commission  (the  FCC  or  Commission).  We  owned  and  provided  programming  and  operating  services  pursuant  to  local 
marketing agreements (LMAs) or provided or were provided sales services pursuant to outsourcing agreements to 87 television 
stations in 47 markets, as of December 31, 2012. For the purpose of this report, these 87 stations are referred to as “our” stations.  

Our  broadcast  group  is  a  single  reportable  segment  for  accounting  purposes  and  includes  the  following  network  affiliations: 
FOX (24 stations); MyNetworkTV (19 stations; not a network affiliation; however, it is branded as such); ABC (12 stations); The 
CW  (16  stations);  CBS  (11  stations);  NBC  (3  stations),  Azteca  (1  station)  and  one  independent  station.    In  addition,  certain 
stations broadcast programming on second and third digital signals through network affiliation or program service arrangements 
with CBS (rebroadcasted content from other primary channels within the same market), The CW, MyNetworkTV, This TV, ME 
TV,  Weather  Radar,  The  Weather  Authority  Network,  Live  Well  Network,  Antenna  TV,  Bounce  Network,  The  Country 
Network, Estrella TV, LATV, Azteca and Telemundo.   

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  our  accounts  and  those  of  our  wholly-owned  and  majority-owned  subsidiaries 
and VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary.  Noncontrolling interest represents a minority owner’s proportionate share of 
the equity  in certain of  our consolidated entities.   All intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in 
consolidation. 

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) guidance on reporting assets held for sale, we reported the 
financial  position  and  results  of  operations  of  our  stations  in  Lansing,  Michigan  (WLAJ-TV)  and  Providence,  Rhode  Island 
(WLWC-TV), as assets and liabilities held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements 
of  operations.   Discontinued operations  have not  been segregated in the consolidated statements  of  cash flows and, therefore, 
amounts for  certain captions will not agree with the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of 
operations. WLAJ-TV  was recently acquired in the second quarter of  2012 in connection  with  the acquisition  of  the television 
stations from Freedom Communications (Freedom). WLWC-TV was recently acquired in the first quarter of 2012 in connection 
with the acquisition of the television stations from Four Points Media Group LLC (Four Points). See Note 2. Acquisitions for more 
information.  In October 2012, we entered into an agreement to sell all the assets of  WLAJ-TV to an unrelated third party for 
$14.4 million.  In January 2013, we entered into an agreement to sell the assets of WLWC-TV to an unrelated third party for $13.8 
million.  The operating results of WLAJ-TV, which was sold effective March 1, 2013, and WLWC-TV, which is expected to divest 
in the second quarter of 2013 are not included in our consolidated results of operations from continuing operations for the year 
ended  December  31,  2012.  As  of  December  31,  2012,  assets  held  for  sale  and  liabilities  held  for  sale  included  $1.5  million  of 
negative  working  capital  and  programming  contracts  payable,  $6.2  million  of  property  and  equipment,  net,  $0.8  million  of 
broadcast licenses, $11.9 million of goodwill and $10.5 million of definite-lived intangible assets for WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV.  
Total revenues for WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV which are included in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 
2012 are $3.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively.  Total income before taxes for WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV which are included 
in  discontinued  operations  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012  are  $0.9  million  and  $0.2  million,  respectively.    Basic  and 
diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations was less than $0.01 per share for the years ended December 31, 2012, 
2011 and 2010 

In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE for financial reporting purposes, we consider whether we have 
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and whether we 
have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that would be significant to the VIE.  We consolidate VIEs 
when we are the primary beneficiary.  The assets of each of our consolidated VIEs can only be used to settle the obligations  of 
the VIE.  All the liabilities, including debt held by our VIEs, are non-recourse to us except for Deerfield Media, Inc.’s (Deerfield) 
debt which we guarantee. See Note 6. Notes Payable and Commercial Bank Financing for more information.   

2012 Annual Report  37  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We  have  entered  into  LMAs  to  provide  programming,  sales  and  managerial  services  for  television  stations  of  Cunningham 
Broadcasting Company (Cunningham), the license owner of seven television stations as of December 31, 2012.  We pay LMA fees 
to Cunningham and also reimburse all operating expenses.  We also have an acquisition agreement in which we have a purchase 
option to buy the license assets of the television stations which includes the FCC license and certain other assets used to operate 
the station (License Assets).   Our applications to acquire the FCC licenses are pending approval.  We own the majority  of  the 
non-license  assets  of  the  Cunningham  stations  and  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement  contains  certain  default  provisions  whereby 
insolvency  of  Cunningham  would  cause an  event  of  default  under  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement.    We  have  determined  that  the 
Cunningham stations are VIEs and that based on the terms of the agreements, the significance of our investment in the stations 
and the cross-default provisions with our Bank Credit Agreement, we are the primary beneficiary of the variable interests because, 
subject to the ultimate control of the licensees, we have the power to direct the activities which significantly impact the economic 
performance of the VIEs through the sales and managerial services we provide and we absorb losses and returns that would be 
considered  significant  to  Cunningham.    See  Note 11. Related Person Transactions for  more  information  on  our  arrangements  with 
Cunningham.  Included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 
and  2010  are  net  revenues  of  $105.5  million,  $90.3  million  and  $94.3  million,  respectively,  which  relates  to  LMAs  with 
Cunningham. 

Effective  December  1,  2012,  we  have  entered  into  joint  sales  agreements  (JSAs)  and  shared  services  agreements  (SSAs)  to 
provide certain non-programming related sales, operational and administrative services for the television stations of Deerfield, the 
license owner of five television stations as of December 31, 2012.  The initial term is for eight years from the commencement and 
the agreement may be automatically renewed for successive eight year renewal terms.  We also have a purchase option to buy the 
license assets of the television stations. We own the majority of the non-license assets of the Deerfield stations and we have also 
guaranteed the debt of Deerfield.  Additionally, there is a lease in place whereby Deerfield leases assets owned by us in order to 
perform its duties under FCC rules. We have determined that the Deerfield stations are VIEs and that based on the terms of the 
agreements,  the  significance  of  our  investment  in  the  stations  and  our  guarantee  of  Deerfield’s  debt,  we  are  the  primary 
beneficiary  of  the  variable  interests  because,  subject  to  the  ultimate  control  of  the  licensees,  we  have  the  power  to  direct  the 
activities which significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs through the sales and managerial services we provide 
and we absorb losses and returns that would be considered significant to Deerfield.  Included in the accompanying consolidated 
statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 are net revenues of $30.3 million that relate to agreements with 
Deerfield. 

We have outsourcing agreements with certain other license owners, under which we provide certain non-programming related 
sales, operational and administrative services.  We pay a fee to the license owners based on a percentage of broadcast cash flow 
and we reimburse all operating expenses.  We also have a purchase option to buy the License Assets.  We have determined that 
the License Assets of these stations are VIEs, and, based on the terms of the agreements and the significance of our investment in 
the stations, we are the primary beneficiary of the variable interests because, subject to the ultimate control of the licensees, we 
have the power to direct the activities which  significantly  impact the economic performance of  the VIE through the sales and 
managerial  services  we  provide  and  because  we  absorb  losses  and  returns  that  would  be  considered  significant  to  the  VIEs.  
Included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are 
net revenues of $18.8 million, $11.9 million and $13.2 million, respectively which relates to these arrangements.   

38  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
As  of  the  dates  indicated,  the  carrying  amounts  and  classification  of  the  assets  and  liabilities  of  the  VIEs  mentioned  above 

which have been included in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands): 

ASSETS 

CURRENT ASSETS: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable 
Income taxes receivable 
Current portion of program contract costs 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 

Total current asset 

PROGRAM CONTRACT COSTS, less current portion 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 
GOODWILL 
BROADCAST LICENSES 
DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net 
OTHER ASSETS 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES  

CURRENT LIABILITIES: 

Accounts payable 
Accrued liabilities 
Current portion of notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing 
Current portion of program contracts payable 

Total current liabilities 

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: 

Notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing, less current portion 
Program contracts payable, less current portion 

Total liabilities 

2012 

3,805 
110 
94 
6,113 
124 
10,246 

1,484 
10,806 
6,357 
14,927 
51,368 
12,723 
107,911 

15 
186 
2,123 
8,991 
11,315 

20,238 
2,080 
33,633 

$   

$  

$   

$  

2011 

2,739 
— 
142 
413 
99 
3,393 

271 
6,658 
6,357 
4,208 
6,601 
5,980 
33,468 

37 
315 
11,074 
373 
11,799 

2,411 
173 
14,383 

$   

$  

$   

$  

The amounts above represent the consolidated assets and liabilities of the VIEs related to our LMAs with Cunningham, JSAs 
and SSAs with Deerfield and certain outsourcing agreements, for which we are the primary beneficiary, and have been aggregated 
as they all relate to  our broadcast business.   Excluded from the amounts above are payments made to Cunningham under the 
LMA  which  are  treated  as  a  prepayment  of  the  purchase  price  of  the  stations  and  capital  leases  between  us  and  Cunningham 
which are eliminated in consolidation.  The total payment made under these LMAs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, which are 
excluded from liabilities above, were $29.8 million and $22.7 million, respectively.  The total capital lease assets excluded from 
above were $11.7 million and $11.8 million, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The risk 
and reward characteristics of the VIEs are similar.   

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2011,  we  began  providing  sales,  programming  and  management  services  to  the  Four  Points  and 
Freedom stations pursuant to LMAs.  Effective January 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition of the Four Points stations and the 
LMA  was  terminated.  Effective  April  1,  2012,  we  completed  the  acquisition  of  the  Freedom  stations  and  the  LMA  was 
terminated. We determined that the Four Points and Freedom stations were VIEs during the period of the LMAs based on the 
terms  of  the  agreement.    We  were  not  the  primary  beneficiary  because  the  owner  of  the  stations  had  the  power  to  direct  the 
activities of the VIEs that most significantly impacted the economic performance of the VIEs.  In the consolidated statements of 
operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 are net broadcast revenues of $10.0 million and station production expenses of 
$7.8  million  related  to  the  Freedom  LMAs,  and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2011  are  net  revenues  of  $10.8  million  and 
station production expenses of $7.7 million related to the Four Points and Freedom LMAs. 

We have investments in other real estate ventures and investment companies which are considered VIEs.  However, we do not 
participate in the management of these entities including the day-to-day operating decisions or other decisions which would allow 
us to control the entity, and therefore, we are not considered the primary beneficiary of these VIEs.  We account for these entities 
using the equity or cost method of accounting.   

2012 Annual Report  39  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The carrying amounts of our investments in these VIEs for which we are not the primary beneficiary as of December 31, 2012 

and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):   

Investments in real estate ventures 
Investments in investment     

companies 
Total 

2012 

Carrying 
amount 
3,648 

$   

27,335 
30,983 

$   

Maximum 
exposure 
3,648 

27,335 
30,983 

$  

$  

2011 

Carrying 
amount 
8,009 

26,276 
34,285 

$   

$   

Maximum 
exposure 
8,009 

26,276 
34,285 

$  

$  

The carrying amounts above are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.  The income and loss related to 
these investments are recorded in income from equity and cost method investments in the consolidated statement of operations.  
We  recorded  income  of  $6.4  million,  $2.8  million  and  $2.1  million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010, 
respectively, related to these investments.   

Our maximum exposure is equal to the carrying value of our investments.  As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, our unfunded 

commitments related to private equity investment funds totaled $8.9 million and $10.9 million, respectively. 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of 
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues 
and  expenses  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  in  the  disclosures  of  contingent  assets  and  liabilities.    Actual  results 
could differ from those estimates.   

In  May  2011,  the  FASB  issued  new  guidance  for  fair  value  measurements.    The  purpose  of  the  new  guidance  is  to  have  a 
consistent definition  of  fair value between U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial 
Reporting  Standards  (IFRS).    Many  of  the  amendments  to  GAAP  are  not  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on  practice; 
however, the  new  guidance does require new and enhanced disclosure about fair value measurements.   The amendments were 
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively. This guidance 
did  not  have  a  material  impact  on  our  consolidated  financial  statements  but  we  have  included  the  additional  quantitative  and 
qualitative disclosures required for our Level 3 fair value measurements beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2012. 

In September 2011, the FASB issued the final Accounting Standards Update for  goodwill impairment testing.  The standard 
allows an entity to first consider qualitative factors when deciding whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step goodwill 
impairment test.  An entity would need to perform step-one if it determines qualitatively that it is more-likely-than-not that the 
fair  value  of  a  reporting  unit  is  less  than  its  carrying  amount.    The  changes  are  effective  prospectively  for  annual  and  interim 
goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  We adopted this new guidance in the 
fourth  quarter  of  2011  in  completing  our  annual  impairment  analysis.    See  Note 5. Goodwill, Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangible 
Assets  for  further  discussion  of  the  results  of  our  goodwill  impairment  analysis.    This  guidance  impacts  how  we  perform  the 
annual goodwill impairment test; however, it did not impact our consolidated financial statements as the guidance does not impact 
the timing or amount of any resulting impairment charges. 

In July 2012, the FASB issued new guidance for  testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  The new guidance 
allows  companies  to  perform  a  qualitative  assessment  to  determine  whether  further  impairment  testing  of  indefinite-lived 
intangible assets is necessary, similar to the approach now applied to goodwill.  Companies can first  determine based on certain 
qualitative factors whether it is “more likely than not” (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that an indefinite-lived intangible 
asset is impaired.  The new standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for 
impairment.  The revised standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after 
September  30,  2012  and  early  adoption  is  permitted.  We  adopted  this  new  guidance  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012  when 
completing our annual impairment analysis.  See Note 5. Goodwill, Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangible Assets for further discussion 
of  the  results  of  our  broadcast  license  impairment  analysis.    This  guidance  impacted  how  we  perform  our  annual  impairment 
testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets and changed our related disclosures for 2012; however, it does not have an impact on 
our consolidated financial statements as the guidance does not impact the timing or amount of any resulting impairment charges.  

40  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We  consider  all  highly  liquid  investments  with  an  original  maturity  of  three  months  or  less  when  purchased  to  be  cash 

equivalents. 

Under the terms of certain lease agreements, as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we were required to hold $0.2 

million of restricted cash related to the removal of analog equipment from some of our leased towers.   

Additionally, during 2011, we entered into definitive agreements to purchase assets of Four Points and Freedom in September 
2011  and  November  2011,  respectively,  we  were  required  to  deposit  10%  of  the  purchase  price  for  each  acquisition  into  an 
escrow account.  As of December 31, 2011, $58.5 million in restricted cash classified as noncurrent related to the amount held in 
escrow for these acquisitions.  

Management  regularly  reviews  accounts  receivable  and  determines  an  appropriate  estimate  for  the  allowance  for  doubtful 
accounts  based  upon  the  impact  of  economic  conditions  on  the  merchant’s  ability  to  pay,  past  collection  experience  and  such 
other factors which, in management’s judgment, deserve current recognition.  In turn, a provision is charged against earnings in 
order to maintain the appropriate allowance level.   

A rollforward of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in 

thousands): 

2012 

2011 

2010 

Balance at beginning of period 
Charged to expense 
Net write-offs 
Balance at end of period 

$  

$  

3,008 
1,141 
(1,058) 
3,091 

$  

$  

3,242 
751 
(985) 
3,008 

$  

$  

2,932 
703 
(393) 
3,242 

We have agreements with distributors for the rights to television programming over contract periods, which generally run from 
one to seven years.  Contract payments are made in installments over terms that are generally equal to or shorter than the contract 
period.    Pursuant  to  accounting  guidance  for  the  broadcasting  industry,  an  asset  and  a  liability  for  the  rights  acquired  and 
obligations incurred under a license agreement are reported on the balance sheet where the cost of  each program is known  or 
reasonably determinable, the program material has been accepted by the licensee in accordance with the conditions of the license 
agreement and the program is available for its first showing or telecast. The portion of program contracts which becomes payable 
within one year is reflected as a current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.   

The rights to this programming are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at the lower of unamortized cost 
or estimated net realizable value.   With the exception of one-year contracts amortization of program contract costs is computed 
using  either  a  four-year  accelerated  method  or  based  on  usage,  whichever  method  results  in  the  earliest  recognition  of 
amortization for each program.  Program contract costs are amortized on a straight-line basis for one-year contracts.  Program 
contract  costs  estimated  by  management  to  be  amortized  in  the  succeeding  year  are  classified  as  current  assets.    Payments  of 
program  contract  liabilities  are  typically  made  on  a  scheduled  basis  and  are  not  affected  by  adjustments  for  amortization  or 
estimated net realizable value.  

Estimated  net  realizable  values  are  based  on  management’s  expectation  of  future  advertising  revenues,  net  of  sales 
commissions, to be generated by the program material.  We perform a net realizable value calculation quarterly for each of our 
program contract costs in accordance with FASB guidance on Financial Reporting for Broadcasters.  We utilize sales information 
to estimate the future revenue of each commitment and measure that amount against the commitment.  If the estimated future 
revenue  is  less  than  the  amount  of  the  commitment,  a  loss  is  recorded  in  amortization  of  program  contract  costs  and  net 
realizable value adjustments in the consolidated statements of operations. 

2012 Annual Report  41  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certain  program  contracts  provide  for  the  exchange  of  advertising  airtime  in  lieu  of  cash  payments  for  the  rights  to  such 
programming.  The revenues realized from station barter arrangements are recorded as the programs are aired at the estimated fair 
value  of  the  advertising  airtime  given  in  exchange  for  the  program  rights.    Program  service  arrangements  are  accounted for  as 
station  barter  arrangements,  however,  network  affiliation  programming  is  excluded  from  these  calculations.    Revenues  are 
recorded  as  revenues  realized  from  station  barter  arrangements  and  the  corresponding  expenses  are  recorded  as  expenses 
recognized from station barter arrangements.  

We broadcast certain customers’ advertising in exchange for equipment, merchandise and services.  The estimated fair value of 
the  equipment,  merchandise  or  services  received  is  recorded  as  deferred  barter  costs  and  the  corresponding  obligation  to 
broadcast advertising is recorded as deferred barter revenues.  The deferred barter costs are expensed or capitalized as they are 
used,  consumed  or  received  and  are  included  in  station  production  expenses  and  station  selling,  general  and  administrative 
expenses, as applicable.  Deferred barter revenues are recognized as the related advertising is aired and are recorded in revenues 
realized from station barter arrangements.   

Other assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of the following (in thousands): 

Equity and cost method investments 
Unamortized costs related to debt issuances  
Other 

Total other assets 

2012 
94,924 
40,260 
54,800 
189,984 

$ 

$ 

2011 
80,539 
34,590 
8,280 
123,409 

$ 

$ 

We have equity and cost method investments primarily in private investment funds and real estate ventures.  These investments 
are included in our other operating divisions segment.  In the event that one or more of our investments are significant, we are 
required to disclose summarized financial information.  For  the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, none  of  our 
investments were significant individually or in the aggregate. 

When factors indicate that there may be a decrease in value of an equity or cost method investment, we assess whether a loss in 
value has occurred related to the investment.  If that loss is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment loss is recorded 
accordingly.    For  any  investments  that  indicate  a  potential  impairment,  we  estimate  the  fair  values  of  those  investments  using 
discounted cash flow models, unrelated third party valuations or industry comparables, based on the various facts available to us.  
For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2010,  we  recorded  impairments  of  $6.7  million  related  to  three  of  our  investments.  No 
impairment  was  recorded  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2011.  For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  we  recorded 
impairments of $1.3 million related to two of our investments. The impairments are recorded in the gain (loss) from equity and 
cost method investees in our consolidated statement of operations.  

Unamortized costs related to debt issuances represent direct costs incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized to 
interest expense over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method.  Previously capitalized debt financing costs 
are expensed and included in loss on extinguishment of debt if we determine that there has been a substantial modification of the 
related debt.   

The increase in other, in the table above, in 2012 was primarily due to the up-front payments to FOX as discussed in Note 10. 

Commitments and Contingencies.    

We  assess  annually,  in  the  fourth  quarter,  whether  goodwill  and  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  are  impaired.  Additionally, 
impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment 
potentially exists. We aggregate our stations by market for purposes of our goodwill and license impairment testing. We believe 
that  our  markets  are  most  representative  of  our  broadcast  reporting  units  because  segment  management  views,  manages  and 
evaluates our stations on a market basis.  Furthermore, in our markets, where we operate or provide services to more than one 
station,  certain  costs  of  operating  the  stations  are  shared  including  the  use  of  buildings  and  equipment,  the  sales  force  and 
administrative personnel. In our assessment of goodwill for impairment we first determined, based upon a qualitative assessment, 
whether it is more likely than not a reporting unit has been impaired.  Our qualitative assessment includes, but is not limited to, 
assessing the changes in macroeconomic conditions, regulatory environment, industry and market conditions, and the specific  

42  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
financial performance of  the reporting units, as well as any other events or circumstances  specific to the reporting units. If  we 
conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, we will apply the quantitative two-step method. In the 
first step, the Company determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares that fair value to the net book value of the 
reporting  unit.  The  fair  value  of  the  reporting  unit  is  determined  using  various  valuation  techniques,  including  quoted  market 
prices,  observed  earnings/cash  flow  multiples  paid  for  comparable  television  stations  and  discounted  cash  flow  models.  Our 
discounted cash flow model is based on our judgment of future market conditions within each designated market area, as well as 
discount rates that would be used by market participants in an arms-length transaction.  If the net book value of the reporting unit 
were to exceed the fair value, we would then perform  the second step of  the impairment test, which requires allocation  of  the 
reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair 
value  being  allocated  to  goodwill  to  determine  the  implied  fair  value.  An  impairment  charge  will  be  recognized  only  when  the 
implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount.   

For our annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangibles, broadcast licenses, we applied a qualitative assessment to assess 
whether it is more likely than not that a broadcast license is impaired.  Our qualitative assessment for indefinite-lived intangible 
impairment  includes,  but  it  not  limited  to,  assessing  the  changes  in  macroeconomic  conditions,  cost  factors,  regulatory 
environment, industry and market conditions, and other events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to 
determine the fair value of our broadcast license  assets.  When evaluating our broadcast licenses for impairment, the qualitative 
assessment is done at the unit of  accounting level, each station’s broadcast license, and we aggregate the broadcast licenses for 
each  market  because  the  broadcast  licenses  within  the  market  are  complementary  and  together  enhance  the  single  broadcast 
license  of  each  station.  If  we  conclude  that  it  is  more  likely  than  not  that  one  of  our  broadcast  licenses  is  impaired,  we  will 
calculate the fair value of the broadcast license in  accordance with the quantitative test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. If a 
quantitative  test is performed, we use the income approach method. The income approach method involves a discounted cash 
flow model that incorporates several variables, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flows of a typical market participant, 
market revenue and long term growth projections, estimated market share for the typical participant and estimated profit margins 
based  on  market  size  and  station  type.  The  model  also  assumes  outlays  for  capital  expenditures,  future  terminal  values,  an 
effective  tax  rate  assumption  and  a  discount  rate  based  on  the  weighted-average  cost  of  capital  of  the  television  broadcast 
industry.  We  will  compare  the  fair  value  of  the  broadcast  licenses,  at  a  market  level,  to  the  carrying  amount  of  those  same 
broadcast licenses.  If the carrying amount of the broadcast licenses exceeds the fair value, then an impairment loss is recorded to 
the extent that the carrying value of the broadcast licenses exceeds the fair value. 

We  periodically  evaluate  our  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  and  continue  to  evaluate  them  as  events  or  changes  in 
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of  such assets may not be fully recoverable.  We evaluate the recoverability of 
long-lived assets by measuring the carrying amount of the assets against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated 
with them.  At the time that such evaluations indicate that the future undiscounted cash flows of certain long-lived assets are not 
sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets, the assets are tested for impairment by comparing their estimated fair value 
to the carrying value.  We typically estimate fair value using discounted cash flow models and appraisals.  See Note 5. Goodwill and 
Other Intangible Assets, for more information. 

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands): 

Compensation and employee insurance 
Interest 
Other accruals relating to operating expenses (a) 
Deferred revenue 
  Total accrued liabilities 

2012 
32,099 
18,885 
78,013 
14,734 
143,731 

$  

$   

2011 
16,665 
12,191 
37,498 
13,344 
79,698 

$   

$   

(a)    Included  in  other  accruals  relating  to  operating  expenses  as  of  December  31,  2012  is  $25.0  million  due  to  Fox  in  April  2013  as 

discussed further in Network Affiliation Agreements and Program Service Agreements under Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies 

We expense these activities when incurred.   

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and 
the tax bases of  assets and liabilities.   We provide a valuation allowance for  deferred tax assets if  we determine that it is more 
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  In evaluating our ability to realize net deferred tax 
assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including our past operating results, tax planning strategies 
and forecasts of future taxable income.  In considering these sources of taxable income, we must make certain judgments that are 

2012 Annual Report  43  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
based on the plans and estimates used to manage our underlying businesses on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2012, a 
valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets related to a substantial amount of our available state net operating 
loss  carryforwards,  based  on  past  operating  results,  expected  timing  of  the  reversals  of  existing  temporary  book/tax  basis 
differences,  alternative  tax  strategies  and  projected  future  taxable  income.  Management  periodically  performs  a  comprehensive 
review of our tax positions and accrues amounts for tax contingencies.  Based on these reviews, the status of ongoing audits and 
the  expiration  of  applicable  statute  of  limitations,  accruals  are  adjusted  as  necessary  in  accordance  with  income  tax  accounting 
guidance.  The resolution of audits is unpredictable and could result in tax liabilities that are significantly higher or lower than for 
what we have provided. 

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we had the following cash transactions (in thousands): 

Income taxes paid related to continuing operations 
Income tax refunds received related to continuing operations 
Interest paid 

2012 

$    46,964 
194 
$   
$    110,973 

2011 

897 
$   
5 
$   
$    98,643 

2010 
1,211 
$   
8,435 
$   
$    110,833 

Non-cash transactions related to capital lease obligations were $0.3 million, $2.3 million and $1.4 million for the years ended 

December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.     

Total revenues include: (i) cash and barter advertising revenues, net of agency commissions; (ii) retransmission consent fees; (iii) 

network compensation; (iv) other broadcast revenues and (v) revenues from our other operating divisions.   

Advertising revenues, net of agency commissions, are recognized in the period during which time spots are aired.   

Our retransmission consent agreements contain both advertising and retransmission consent elements.  We have determined 
that our retransmission consent agreements are revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Advertising and retransmission 
consent deliverables sold under our agreements are separated into different units of accounting at fair value.   Revenue applicable 
to  the  advertising  element  of  the  arrangement  is  recognized  similar  to  the  advertising  revenue  policy  noted  above.    Revenue 
applicable to the retransmission consent element of the arrangement is recognized over the life of the agreement. 

Network compensation revenue is recognized over the term of the contract.  All other significant revenues are recognized as 

services are provided.   

Advertising  expenses  are  recorded  in  the  period  when  incurred  and  are  included  in  station  production  and  other  operating 
division expenses.  Total advertising expenses from continuing operations, net of  advertising co-op credits, were $12.2 million, 
$8.7 million and $6.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 

Financial instruments, as of  December 31, 2012 and 2011, consisted of  cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, 
notes receivable (which are included in other current assets), accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable.  The carrying 
amounts approximate fair value for each of these financial instruments, except for the notes payable.  See Note 6. Notes Payable and 
Commercial Bank Financing, for additional information regarding the fair value of notes payable.   

We  are  required  to  recognize  the  funded  status  (i.e.,  the  difference  between  the  fair  value  of  plan  assets  and  the  projected 
benefit obligations) of our pension plan in our consolidated financial statements.  As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we held a 
liability of $5.5 million and $4.6 million, respectively, representing the underfunded status of our defined benefit pension plan. 

Certain  reclassifications  have  been  made  to  prior  years’  consolidated  financial  statements  to  conform  to  the  current  year’s 

presentation.   

44  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On  February  25,  2013,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  purchase  certain  stock  and/or  broadcast  assets  of  four  television 
stations,  located  in  four  markets,  owned  by  COX  Media  Group  (CMG)  for  $99.0  million  less  $4.3  million  of  working  capital 
adjustments, less amounts to be paid by third party companies, and entered into an agreement to provide sales services to one 
other  station.  The  transaction  is  expected  to  close  in  the  second  quarter  of  2013  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  FCC  and 
customary  antitrust  clearance.  The  Company  expects  to  finance  the  acquisition  through  a  bank  loan  and/or  by  accessing  the 
capital markets 

On  February  28,  2013,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  purchase  the  broadcast  assets  of  18  television  stations  owned  by 
Barrington Broadcasting Group, LLC for $370.0 million, less amounts to be paid by third parties, and entered into agreements  to 
operate or provide sales services to another six stations. Also, the company will sell its station WSYT-TV (FOX) and assign its 
LMA with WNYS-TV (MNT) in Syracuse, NY, and sell its station in Peoria IL, WYZZ-TV (FOX). The transaction is expected to 
close in the second quarter of 2013 subject to the approval of the FCC and customary antitrust clearance. The Company expects 
to finance the acquisition through a bank loan and/or by accessing the capital markets. 

2.  ACQUISITIONS: 

Four Points 

Effective  January  1,  2012,  we  completed  the  acquisition  of  the  broadcast  assets  of  Four  Points,  which  we  had  previously 
operated pursuant to a LMA since October 1, 2011.  The acquired assets consist of the following seven stations in four markets 
along with the respective network affiliation or program service arrangements: KUTV (CBS) and KMYU (MNT / This TV) in 
Salt Lake City / St. George, UT; KEYE (CBS) in Austin, TX; WTVX (CW), WTCN (MNT) and WWHB (Azteca) in West Palm 
Beach / Fort Pierce / Stuart, FL; and WLWC (CW) in Providence, RI / New Bedford, MA.  This acquisition provides expansion 
into additional markets and increases value based on the synergies we can achieve.  

We paid Four Points $200.0 million in cash, less a working capital adjustment of  $0.9 million.  The acquisition was financed 
with a $180.0 million draw under an incremental Term B Loan commitment under our amended Bank Credit Agreement plus a 
$20.0 million cash escrow previously paid in September 2011. 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the results of the acquired operations are included in the financial statements of 
the  Company  beginning  January  1,  2012.    The  purchase  price  has  been  allocated  to  the  acquired  assets  and  assumed  liabilities 
based on estimated fair values.  The allocated fair value of  acquired assets  and assumed liabilities  is  summarized as follows (in 
thousands): 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Program contract costs 
Property and equipment 
Broadcast licenses 
Definite-lived intangible assets 
Other assets 
Accrued liabilities 
Program contracts payable 
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired 
Goodwill 
Total 

$   

$  

456 
3,731 
34,578 
10,658 
93,800 
548 
(381) 
(5,157) 
138,233 
60,843 
199,076 

The  final  allocation  presented  above  is  based  upon  management’s  estimate  of  the  fair  values  using  valuation  techniques 
including income, cost and market approaches.  In estimating the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair 
value  estimates  are  based  on,  but  not  limited  to,  expected  future  revenue  and  cash  flows,  expected  future  growth  rates,  and 
estimated discount rates.  The amount allocated to definite-lived intangible assets represents the estimated fair values of network 
affiliations  of  $66.9  million,  the  decaying  advertiser  base  of  $9.8  million,  and  other  intangible  assets  of  $17.1  million.  These 
intangible assets will be amortized over the estimated remaining useful lives of 15 years for network affiliations, 10 years  for the 
decaying advertiser base and a weighted average of 14 years for the other intangible assets.  Acquired property and equipment will 
be depreciated on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated remaining useful lives.  Goodwill is calculated as the excess of 
the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and represents the future economic benefits 
expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce 
and  noncontractual  relationships,  as  well  as  expected  future  synergies.    We  expect  that  goodwill  will  be  deductible  for  tax 

2012 Annual Report  45  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
purposes.  Certain measurement period adjustments have been made since the initial allocation in the first quarter of 2012, which 
were not material to the consolidated financial statements.  

Prior  to  the  acquisition,  since  October  1,  2011,  we  provided  sales,  programming  and  management  services  to  the  stations 
pursuant to an LMA.  During that period, we funded the working capital needs of the stations, which totaled $8.1 million as of 
December 31, 2011 and was reflected as cash flows used in operating activities within the consolidated statement of cash flows 
for that period.  This working capital is not reflected in the purchase price allocation presented above. 

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 include the results of the Four Points stations since January 1, 
2012.    Net  broadcast  revenues  and  operating  income  of  the  Four  Points  stations  included  in  our  consolidated  statements  of 
operations, were $70.0 million and $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively.  These amounts exclude the 
operations of WLWC-TV which are classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.  See Note 
1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.  Net broadcast revenues and operating losses of WLWC-TV were 
$5.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012.   

Freedom 

Effective April 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition of the broadcast  assets of Freedom, which we had previously operated 
pursuant to a LMA since December 1, 2011. The acquired assets consist of the following eight stations in seven markets along 
with the respective network affiliation or program service arrangements: WPEC (CBS) in West Palm Beach, FL; WWMT (CBS) in 
Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo/Battle Creek, MI;  WRGB (CBS) and WCWN (CW) in Albany, NY; WTVC (ABC) in Chattanooga, 
TN;  WLAJ  (ABC)  in  Lansing,  MI;  KTVL  (CBS)  in  Medford-Klamath  Falls,  OR;  and  KFDM  (CBS)  in  Beaumont/Port 
Arthur/Orange, TX.  This acquisition provides expansion into additional markets and increases value based on the synergies we 
can achieve.  

We paid Freedom $385.0 million plus a working capital adjustment of $0.3 million.  The acquisition was financed with a draw 
under  a  $157.5  million  incremental  Term  Loan  A  and  a  $192.5  million  incremental  Term  B  Loan  commitment  under  our 
amended Bank Credit Agreement, plus a $38.5 million cash escrow previously paid in November 2011. 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the results of the acquired operations are included in the financial statements of 
the Company beginning April 1, 2012.  The purchase price has been allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based 
on  estimated  fair  values.    The  allocated  fair  value  of  acquired  assets  and  assumed  liabilities  is  summarized  as  follows  (in 
thousands): 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Program contract costs 
Property and equipment 
Broadcast licenses 
Definite-lived intangible assets 
Other assets 
Accrued liabilities 
Program contracts payable 
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired 
Goodwill 
Total 

$   

373 
3,520 
  54,109 
  10,424 
  140,963 
278 
(589) 
(3,404) 
  205,674 
  179,609 
$    385,283 

The allocation presented above is based upon management’s estimate  of  the fair values using valuation techniques including 
income,  cost  and  market  approaches.    In  estimating  the  fair  value  of  the  acquired  assets  and  assumed  liabilities,  the  fair  value 
estimates are based on, but not limited to, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated 
discount rates.  The amount allocated to definite-lived intangible assets represents the estimated fair values of network affiliations 
of $93.1 million, the decaying advertiser base of $25.1 million, and other intangible assets of $22.8 million.  These intangible assets 
will be amortized over the estimated remaining useful lives of 15 years for network affiliations, 10 years for the decaying advertiser 
base and a weighted average life of 16 years for the other intangible assets.  Acquired property and equipment will be depreciated 
on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  respective  estimated  remaining  useful  lives.    Goodwill  is  calculated  as  the  excess  of  the 
consideration transferred over the fair value of  the identifiable net assets acquired and represents the future economic benefits 
expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce 
and  noncontractual  relationships,  as  well  as  expected  future  synergies.    We  expect  that  goodwill  will  be  deductible  for  tax 
purposes.    Certain  measurement  period  adjustments  have  been  made  since  the  initial  allocation  in  the  second  quarter  of  2012, 
which were not material to the consolidated financial statements 

46  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior  to  the  acquisition,  since  December  1,  2011,  we  provided  sales,  programming  and  management  services  to  the  stations 
pursuant to an LMA.  During that period, we funded the working capital needs of the stations, which totaled $1.5 million as of 
December 31, 2011 and $9.6 million as of March 31, 2012 and was reflected as cash flows used in operating activities within the 
consolidated  statement  of  cash  flows  for  those  periods.    This  working  capital  is  not  reflected  in  the  purchase  price  allocation 
presented above. 

The  results  of  operations  for  the  year  ended  December  31, 2012  includes  the  results  of  the  Freedom  stations  since  April  1, 
2012.    Net  broadcast  revenues  and  operating  income  of  the  Freedom  stations  included  in  our  consolidated  statements  of 
operations, were $91.0 million and $32.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively. These amounts exclude the 
operations of WLAJ-TV which are classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.  See Note 1. 
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.    Net  broadcast  revenues  and  operating  losses  of  WLAJ-TV  were 
$3.8  million  and  $0.9  million,  respectively,  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012.    Additionally,  during  the  first  quarter  2012, 
prior to the acquisition, we recorded net broadcast revenues of $10.0 million related to the Freedom LMAs. 

Newport 

Effective December 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition of certain broadcast assets of Newport  Television (Newport). The 
acquired  assets  relate  to  the  following  seven  stations  in  six  markets  along  with  the  respective  network  affiliation  or  program 
service  arrangements:  WKRC 
in 
Harrisburg/Lancaster/Lebanon/York,  PA;  WPMI  (NBC)  and  WJTC  (IND)  in  Mobile,  AL/Pensacola,  FL;  KSAS  (FOX)  in 
Wichita/Hutchinson, KS; and WHAM (ABC) in Rochester, NY.  We also acquired Newport’s rights under the local marketing 
agreements with WLYH (CW) in Harrisburg, PA and KMTW (MNT) in  Wichita, KS, as  well as options to acquire the license 
assets.  This acquisition provides expansion into additional markets and increases value based on the synergies we can achieve.  

in  San  Antonio,  TX;  WHP 

in  Cincinnati,  OH;  WOAI 

(NBC) 

(CBS) 

(CBS) 

We paid Newport  $460.5 million in cash,  less a working capital adjustment  of  $1.0  million.  We financed the $460.5 million 
purchase price, less the $41.3 million in escrow with the net proceeds from the 6.125% Notes issued in October 2012. See Note 6. 
Notes Payable and Commercial Bank Financing for more information.  

Our right to acquire certain of the license assets of WPMI and WJTC in Mobile, AL was assigned to Deerfield and Deerfield 
acquired these assets effective December 1, 2012 for $6.0 million. Additionally, Deerfield acquired the license assets of WHAM in 
Rochester,  NY  effective  February  1,  2013  for  $6.0  million,  using  borrowings  under  its  bank  credit  facility.  Prior  to  Deerfield’s 
acquisition of the assets of WHAM, the assets were owned by Newport.  Concurrent with the acquisition of WKRC in Cincinnati, 
OH and WOAI in San Antonio, TX from Newport, we sold to Deerfield the license assets of two of our existing stations located 
in  Cincinnati,  OH  (WSTR  MNT)  and  San  Antonio,  TX  (KMYS  CW)  for  a  total  of  $10.7  million.  Deerfield  financed  these 
purchases with third party bank financing  which we have guaranteed. See  Note 6. Notes Payable and Commercial Bank Financing for 
more  information.    We  have  assignable  purchase  option  agreements  with  Deerfield  to  acquire  the  license  assets  upon  FCC 
approval  and  operate  the  stations  pursuant  to  shared  services  and  joint  sales  agreements  with  Deerfield.  We  consolidate  the 
license assets owned by Deerfield because the licensee companies are VIEs and we are the primary beneficiary. Prior to Deerfield 
acquiring  the  license  assets  of  WHAM  in  Rochester,  NY  on  February  1,  2013,  we  operated  the  station  pursuant  to  a  shared 
services and joint sales agreement with Newport. We consolidated the license assets owned by Newport from December 1, 2012 
to  January  31,  2013  because  the  licensee  company  is  a  VIE  and  the  Company  is  the  primary  beneficiary.  See  Variable Interest 
Entities in Note 1.  Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.  The purchase of the license assets by Deerfield in 
February 2013 will be accounted for as a transaction between parties under common control. 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the results of the acquired operations are included in the financial statements of 
the  Company  beginning  December  1,  2012.  The  initial  purchase  price  has  been  allocated  to  the  acquired  assets  and  assumed 
liabilities  based  on  estimated  fair  values.  The  initial  purchase  price  allocated  includes  $460.5  million  paid  for  certain  broadcast 
assets  of  the  seven  stations  from  Newport  and  the  rights  under  the  LMAs  with  the  two  other  stations,  $6.0  million  paid  by 
Deerfield  for  the  license  assets  of  WPMI  and  WJTC,  and  $6.2  million  of  noncontrolling  interests  related  to  the  WHAM  and 
WLYH VIEs, less a working capital adjustment of $1.0 million. The sale of  the license assets of  WSTR in Cincinnati, OH and 
KMYS in San Antonio, TX was considered a transaction between parties under common control and therefore was not included 
in the purchase price allocation. The purchase price allocation is preliminary pending a final determination of the fair values of the 
assets and liabilities. The initial allocated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including the assets owned by VIEs, 
is summarized as follows (in thousands): 

2012 Annual Report  47  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Program contract costs 
Property and equipment 
Broadcast licenses 
Definite-lived intangible assets 
Other assets 
Accrued liabilities 
Program contracts payable 
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired 
Goodwill 
Total 

$   

$  

1,377 
9,309 
61,253 
15,017 
226,516 
994 
(3,498) 
(10,539) 
300,429 
171,298 
471,727 

The preliminary allocation presented above is based upon management’s estimate of the fair values using valuation techniques 
including income, cost and market approaches.  In estimating the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair 
value  estimates  are  based  on,  but  not  limited  to,  expected  future  revenue  and  cash  flows,  expected  future  growth  rates,  and 
estimated discount rates.  The amount allocated to definite-lived intangible assets represents the estimated fair values of network 
affiliations  of  $167.7  million,  the  decaying  advertiser  base  of  $21.3  million,  and  other  intangible  assets  of  $37.5  million.  These 
intangible assets will be amortized over the estimated remaining useful lives of 15 years for network affiliations, 10 years for the 
decaying advertiser base and a weighted average of 14 years for the other intangible assets.  Acquired property and equipment will 
be depreciated on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated remaining useful lives.  Goodwill is calculated as the excess of 
the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and represents the future economic benefits 
expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce 
and  noncontractual  relationships,  as  well  as  expected  future  synergies.    We  expect  that  goodwill  will  be  deductible  for  tax 
purposes.  The initial purchase price allocation is based upon all information available to us at the present time and is subject to 
change, and such changes could be material.   

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 include the results of the Newport stations since December 1, 
2012.    Net  broadcast  revenues  and  operating  income  of  the  Newport  stations  included  in  our  consolidated  statements  of 
operations, were $11.7 million and $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively. 

Pro Forma Information 

The  following  table  sets  forth  unaudited  pro  forma  results  of  operations,  assuming  that  the  above  acquisitions,  along  with 
transactions necessary to finance the acquisitions, occurred at the beginning of each annual period presented (in thousands, except 
per share data):  

Total revenues 
Net Income 
Net Income attributable to Sinclair Broadcast Group 
Basic and diluted earnings per share  

attributable to Sinclair Broadcast Group 

(Unaudited) 

          2012 
1,210,257 
151,751 
151,352 

$    
$    
$   

$  

  1.86 

   2011 
1,028,168 
77,899 
77,370 

0.96 

$ 
$ 
$ 

$ 

This  pro  forma  financial  information  is  based  on  historical  results  of  operations,  adjusted  for  the  allocation  of  the  purchase 
price and other acquisition accounting adjustments, and is not necessarily indicative of what our results would have been had we 
operated  the  businesses  since  the  beginning  of  the  annual  period  presented.    The  pro  forma  adjustments  reflect  depreciation 
expense, amortization of intangibles and amortization of program contract costs related to the fair value adjustments of the assets 
acquired,  additional  interest  expense  related  to  the  financing  of  the  transactions,  exclusion  of  nonrecurring  financing  and 
transaction related costs, alignment of accounting policies and the related tax effects of the adjustments.  The pro forma revenues 
exclude the revenues of WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV which are classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements 
of  operations.    Total  revenues  of  WLAJ-TV  and  WLWC-TV  which  are  excluded  from  the  pro  forma  results  above  are  $4.9 
million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $3.3 million and $6.5 million, respectively for the 
year ended December 31, 2011.  

In  connection  with  these  acquisitions,  we  incurred  a  total  of  $1.8  million  of  costs  primarily  related  to  legal  and  other 
professional  services,  which  we  expensed  as  incurred.    For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  such  costs  were  incurred  in 
corporate, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.  These costs were not included in the 
pro forma amounts above as they are nonrecurring in nature.  

48  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Acquisitions 

We  acquired  five  other  television  stations  during  the  year  ended  2012  in  three  markets.    The  initial  purchase  price  allocated 
includes $45.1 million paid for certain broadcast assets of these stations, less working capital adjustments of $1.2 million, and $4.4 
million of noncontrolling interests related to the license assets of certain of these stations owned by variable interest entities that 
we consolidate. We allocated the total purchase price of these five stations as follows: 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Program contract costs 
Property and equipment 
Broadcast licenses 
Definite-lived intangible assets 
Accrued liabilities 
Program contracts payable 
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired 
Goodwill 
Total 

$   

$  

98 
2,487 
17,309 
2,825 
17,990 
(1,590) 
(4,900) 
34,219 
14,093 
48,312 

In  conjunction  with  these  acquisitions,  we  incurred  transaction  costs  of  approximately  $0.7  million,  which  are  reported  in 
general  and  administrative  expenses  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  statements  of  operations.  The  results  of  operations  of 
these acquisitions were not material to our consolidated statements of operations or our financial position for the 2012 year.  

In December 2012, we acquired the license assets of  WTTA-TV in Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida from Bay Television, Inc. 
(Bay TV). Prior to December 1, 2012, we performed sales, programming and other management services to the station pursuant 
to an LMA which was terminated upon closing. As discussed in  Note 11. Related Person Transactions, our controlling shareholders 
own  a  controlling  interest  in  Bay  TV.  As  this  was  considered  a  transaction  between  entities  under  common  control,  the 
acquisition  method  of  accounting  was  not  applied,  and  the  assets  acquired  were  recorded  at  their  historical  cost  basis  and  the 
difference between the purchase price and the historical cost basis of the assets of $23.6 million, net of taxes of $15.6 million, was 
recorded  as  a  reduction  in  additional  paid-in  capital.  A  substantial  portion  of  the  purchase  price  will  be  deductible  for  tax 
purposes in future periods. 

3.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS: 

We  have  seven  types  of  stock-based  compensation  awards:  compensatory  stock  options  (options),  restricted  stock  awards 
(RSAs),  an  employee  stock  purchase  plan  (ESPP),  employer  matching  contributions  (the  Match)  for  participants  in  our  401(k) 
plan,  stock-settled appreciation rights (SARs), subsidiary stock awards and stock grants  to  our non-employee directors.   Stock-
based compensation expense has no effect on our consolidated cash flows.  Below is a summary of the key terms and methods of 
valuation of our stock-based compensation awards: 

Options.  In  June  1996,  our  Board  of  Directors  adopted,  upon  approval  of  the  shareholders  by  proxy,  the  1996  Long-Term 
Incentive Plan (LTIP).  The purpose of the LTIP is to reward key individuals for making major contributions to our success and 
the success of our subsidiaries and to attract and retain the services of qualified and capable employees.  Options granted pursuant 
to the LTIP must be exercised within 10 years following the grant date.  A total of 14,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock 
are reserved for awards under this plan.  As of December 31, 2012, 9,477,809 shares (including forfeited shares) were available for 
future grants.  We have not issued any options subsequent to accelerating the vesting in 2005. 

The following is a summary of changes in outstanding stock options: 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011 
2012 Activity: 

Granted 
Exercised 
Cancelled 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012 

Options 
179,000 

— 
(11,000) 
(38,500) 
129,500 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price 
11.69 
$ 

Exercisable 
179,000 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price 

$ 

11.69 

— 
10.89 
11.87 
11.73 

$ 

— 
— 
— 
129,500 

— 
— 
— 
11.73 

$ 

2012 Annual Report  49  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RSAs.  RSAs are granted to employees pursuant to the LTIP.  RSAs issued in 2012, 2011 and 2010 have certain restrictions that 
lapse over two years at 50% and 50%, respectively. RSAs issued prior to 2010 have certain restrictions that lapse over three  years 
at  25%,  25%  and  50%,  respectively.    As  the  restrictions  lapse,  the  Class  A  Common  Stock  may  be  freely  traded  on  the  open 
market.  Unvested RSAs are entitled to dividends.  The fair value assumes the value of the stock on the grant date. 

The following is a summary of changes in unvested restricted stock: 

Unvested shares at December 31, 2011 
2012 Activity: 

Granted 
Vested 
Forfeited 

Unvested shares at December 31, 2012 

RSAs 
174,500 

114,000 
(130,000) 
— 
158,500 

Weighted-Average 
Price 
8.97 

$   

11.68 
7.91 
 — 
11.79 

$  

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded compensation  expense of $1.2 million, $1.0 million and 
$0.8 million, respectively. The majority of the unrecognized compensation expense of $0.9 million, as of December 31, 2012, will 
be recognized in 2013. 

ESPP.    In  March  1998,  the  Board  of  Directors  adopted,  subject  to  approval  of  the  shareholders,  the  ESPP.    The  ESPP 
provides our employees with an opportunity to become shareholders through a convenient arrangement for purchasing shares of 
Class  A  Common  Stock.    On  the  first  day  of  each  payroll  deduction  period,  each  participating  employee  receives  options  to 
purchase a number of shares of our common stock with money that is withheld from his or her paycheck. The number of shares 
available to the participating employee is determined at the end of the payroll deduction period by dividing the total amount of 
money withheld during the payroll deduction period by the exercise price of the options (as described below). Options granted 
under the ESPP to employees are automatically exercised to purchase shares on the last day of the payroll deduction period unless 
the  participating  employee  has,  at  least  thirty  days  earlier,  requested  that  his  or  her  payroll  contributions  stop.    Any  cash 
accumulated in an employee’s account for a period in which an employee elects not to participate is distributed to the employee.

The initial exercise price for options under the ESPP is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the common stock as of 
the first day of the quarter and as of the last day of that quarter. No participant can purchase more than $25,000 worth of our 
common stock over all payroll deduction periods ending during the same calendar year.  We value the stock options under the 
ESPP  using  the  Black-Scholes  option  pricing  model,  which  incorporates  the  following  assumptions  as  of  December  31,  2012, 
2011 and 2010:   

Risk-free interest rate 
Expected life 
Expected volatility 
Weighted average volatility 
Annual dividend yield 
Weighted average dividend yield 

2012 
0.1% 
3 months 
38%-53% 
44% 
4.3%-6.7% 
5.2% 

2011 
0.4% 
3 months 
38%-67% 
51% 
3.8%-6.6% 
5.4% 

2010 
0.3% 
3 months 
64%-88% 
77% 
—% 
—% 

We use the Black-Scholes model as opposed to a lattice pricing model because employee exercise patterns are not relevant to 
this  plan.    The  risk-free  interest  rate  is  based  on  the  U.S.  Treasury  yield  curve  in  effect  at  the  time  of  grant  with  short-term 
maturities that approximate the expected life of the options.  The expected life is based on the approximate number of days in the 
quarter assuming the option was issued on the first day of the quarter.  The expected volatility is based on our historical stock 
prices over the previous three month period.  The annual dividend yield is based on the annual dividend per share divided by  the 
share price on the grant date. 

The stock-based compensation expense recorded related to the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 
was $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.  Less than 0.1 million shares were issued to employees during the year 
ended December 31, 2012.   

Match.  The Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the 401(k) Plan) is available as a benefit for 
our eligible employees.  Contributions made to the 401(k) Plan include an employee elected salary reduction amount, the Match 
and  an  additional  discretionary  amount  determined  each  year  by  the  Board  of  Directors.    The  Match  and  any  additional 
discretionary contributions may be made using our Class A Common Stock if the Board of Directors so chooses.  Typically, we 
make the Match using our Class A Common Stock.  

50  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The value of the Match is based on the level of elective deferrals into the 401(k) plan.  The amount of shares of our Class A 
Common Stock used to make the Match is determined using the closing price on or about March 1st of each year for the previous 
calendar year’s Match.  The Match is discretionary and is equal to a maximum of 50% of elective deferrals by eligible employees, 
capped at 4% of the employee’s total cash compensation.  For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded 
$1.6 million, $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to the Match. 

SARs.  On March 9, 2012, 400,000 SARs were granted to David Smith, our President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 
the LTIP.  The base value of each SAR is $11.68 per share, which was the closing price of our Class A Common Stock on the 
grant date.  The SARs had a grant date fair value of $2.0 million. On March 22, 2011, 300,000 SARs were granted to David Smith, 
our President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to the LTIP.  The base value of each SAR is $12.07 per share, which was the 
closing price of our Class A Common Stock on the grant date.  The SARs had a grant date fair value of $2.2 million.   On March 
12,  2010, 300,000  SARs were  granted to David Smith, pursuant to the LTIP.   The base value of  each SAR  is  $5.75  per share, 
which  was  the  closing  price  of  our  Class  A  Common  Stock  on  the  grant  date.    The  SARs  had  a  grant  date  fair  value  of  $1.6 
million.  The  SARs  have  a  10-year  term  and  vest  immediately.    We  valued  the  SARs  using  the  Black-Scholes  model  and  the 
following assumptions: 

Risk-free interest rate 
Expected life 
Expected volatility 
Annual dividend yield 

2012 
0.9% 
5 years 
73% 
5.2% 

2011 
3.6% 
10 years 
68% 
2.3% 

2010 
3.9% 
10 years 
110% 
—% 

The following is a summary of the changes in SARS: 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011 
2012 Activity: 

Granted 
Exercised 

Outstanding SARs at December 31, 2012 

SARs 

Weighted-
Average Price 

500,000  $   

13.55 

400,000 
— 
900,000  $  

11.68 
 — 
12.72 

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded compensation expense, at the grant date, of $2.0 million, 
$2.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to these grants.  In 2011, David Smith exercised 650,000 of his then outstanding 
SARs for 237,947 shares.  During 2012, 2011 and 2010, outstanding SARs increased the weighted average shares outstanding for 
purposes of determining dilutive earnings per share.  As of December 31, 2012, 900,000 SARs were outstanding.   

Subsidiary Stock Awards.  From time to time, we grant subsidiary stock awards to employees.  The subsidiary stock is typically in 
the form of a membership interest in a consolidated limited liability company, not traded on a public exchange and valued based 
on  the  estimated  fair  value  of  the  subsidiary.    Fair  value  is  typically  estimated  using  discounted  cash  flow  models  and/or 
appraisals.  These stock awards vest immediately.  For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded compensation 
expense of  $0.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related to these awards. We did not issue any subsidiary stock awards in 
2010, and therefore no compensation expense was recorded.  These awards have no effect on the shares used in our basic and 
diluted earnings per share.  

Stock  Grants  to  Non-Employee  Directors.    In  addition  to  directors  fees  paid,  on  the  date  of  each  of  our  annual  meetings  of 
shareholders, each non-employee director receives a grant of shares of Class A Common Stock pursuant  to the LTIP.  In 2012, 
2011 and 2010, each non-employee director received 5,000 shares, respectively.   On June 14, 2012, June 3, 2011 and June 3, 2010, 
we granted 25,000 shares that had a fair value of $8.12 per share, 25,000 shares that had a fair value of $9.39 per share and 25,000 
shares that had a fair value of $6.61 per share, respectively.  The fair value assumes the closing value of the stock on the  date of 
grant.  We recorded expense of $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Additionally, these 
shares are included in the total shares outstanding, which results in a dilutive effect on our basic and diluted earnings (loss) per 
share. 

2012 Annual Report  51  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: 

Property  and  equipment  are  stated  at  cost,  less  accumulated  depreciation.    Depreciation  is  generally  computed  under  the 

straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: 

Buildings and improvements 
Station equipment 
Office furniture and equipment 
Leasehold improvements 
Automotive equipment 
Property and equipment under capital leases 

10 - 30 years 
5 - 10 years 
5 - 10 years 
Lesser of 10 - 30 years or lease term 
3 - 5 years 
Lease term 

Acquired property and equipment as discussed in Note 2. Acquisitions, is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the respective 

estimated remaining useful lives 

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands): 

Land and improvements 
Real estate held for development and sale 
Buildings and improvements 
Station equipment 
Office furniture and equipment 
Leasehold improvements 
Automotive equipment 
Capital leased assets 
Construction in progress 

Less: accumulated depreciation 

2012 
33,932 
56,419 
135,162 
425,823 
41,134 
18,362 
20,634 
79,126 
18,274 
828,866 
(389,153) 
439,713 

$  

$  

2011 
20,303 
55,517 
98,283 
306,041 
37,305 
14,495 
12,578 
79,259 
6,647 
630,428 
(348,907) 
281,521 

$  

$  

Capital leased assets are related to building, tower and equipment leases.  Depreciation related to capital leases  is included in 
depreciation  expense  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  operations.    We  recorded  capital  lease  depreciation  expense  of  $3.5 
million, $3.8 million and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  

5.  GOODWILL, BROADCAST LICENSES AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:  

Goodwill,  which  arises  from  the  purchase  price  exceeding  the  assigned  value  of  the  net  assets  of  an  acquired  business, 
represents  the  value  attributable  to  unidentifiable  intangible  elements  being  acquired.  Goodwill  totaled  $1,074.0  million  and 
$660.1 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The change in the carrying amount of goodwill related to continuing 
operations was as follows (in thousands): 

Balance at December 31, 2010  

Goodwill 
Accumulated impairment losses 

Acquisition of other operating divisions companies (a) 
Balance at December 31, 2011 (d) 

Goodwill (a) 
Accumulated impairment losses 

Acquisition of television stations (b) 
Reclassification of goodwill to assets held for sale (c) 
Balance at December 31, 2012 (d) 

Goodwill 
Accumulated impairment losses 

52  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

Broadcast 

$    1,070,202 
(413,573) 
656,629 
— 

  1,070,202 
(413,573) 
656,629 
425,822 
(11,907) 

1,484,117 
(413,573) 
1,070,544 

$ 

$ 

Other 
Operating 
Divisions 

Consolidated 

$   

3,388 
— 
3,388 
100 

3,488 
— 
3,488 
— 
— 

3,488 
— 
3,488 

$   

$   

1,073,590 
(413,573) 
660,017 
100 

1,073,690 
(413,573) 
660,117 
425,822 
(11,907) 

1,487,605 
(413,573) 
1,074,032 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
(a) 

In May 2011 we recorded $0.1 million of goodwill when we acquired the Ring of Honor wrestling franchise.  

(b)  In 2012, we acquired goodwill as a result of acquisitions as discussed in Note 2. Acquisitions.  

(c) 

In 2012, we reclassified goodwill to assets held for sale as a result of the pending sales of WLAJ-TV in Lansing, Michigan, and 
WLWC-TV in Providence, Rhode Island as discussed in  Discontinued Operations under Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of 
Significant Accounting Policies.   

(d)  Approximately $6.4 million of goodwill relates to consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.  

As  of  December  31,  2012  and  2011,  the  carrying  amount  of  our  broadcast  licenses  related  to  continuing  operations  was  as 

follows (in thousands): 

Beginning balance  
Broadcast license impairment charge  
Acquisition of television stations (a) 
Reclassification of broadcast license to assets held for sale (b) 
Ending balance (c) 

$   

$   

2012 
47,002 
— 
38,924 
(804) 
85,122 

$   

$   

2011 
47,375 
(398) 
25 
— 
47,002 

(a) 

In 2012, we acquired broadcast licenses as a result of acquisitions as discussed in Note 2. Acquisitions. In 2011, Cunningham, a VIE 
for which we consolidate, acquired the license assets of WDBB-TV, in Birmingham, Alabama. 

(b)  In 2012, we reclassified the broadcast license of WLAJ-TV in Lansing, Michigan and WLWC-TV in Providence, Rhode Island to 
assets  held  for  sale  as  discussed  in  Discontinued  Operations  under  Note  1.  Nature  of  Operations  and  Summary  of  Significant  Accounting 
Policies. 

(c)  Approximately  $14.9  million  and  $4.2  million  of  broadcast  licenses  relate  to  consolidated  VIEs  as  of  December  31,  2012  and 

2011, respectively. 

We  did  not  have  any  indicators  of  impairment  in  the  first,  second  or  third  quarters  of  2012  and  therefore  did  not  perform 
interim impairment tests for goodwill or broadcast licenses during those periods. We performed our annual impairment tests in 
the fourth quarter of 2012 based on the new guidance for testing goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, 
and  we  did  not  recognize  any  impairment  to  goodwill  or  broadcast  licenses  in  2012  as  a  result  of  our  qualitative  and/or 
quantitative assessments. Based on the results of our annual qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment performed in 2012, 
we concluded that we would need to perform a quantitative “Step 1” test for three of our markets which had aggregate goodwill 
of $79.5 million as of October 1, 2012, the date of our annual impairment test.  These markets had a decrease in operating results 
for the past few years and therefore, we estimated the fair value of these reporting units based on a market approach and income 
approach.  For all three markets, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the respective carrying value by more than 10%.  
For all our other reporting units, we concluded based on the qualitative assessment that it was more likely than not that the fair 
values of these reporting units would sufficiently exceed their carrying values and it was not necessary to perform the quantitative 
two-step method. 

We  did  not  have  any  indicators  of  impairment  in  the  first,  second  or  third  quarters  of  2011  and  therefore  did  not  perform 
interim impairment tests for goodwill during those periods.  In the first quarter 2011, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.4 
million  for  our  broadcast  licenses  due  to  anticipated  increase  in  costs  for  one  of  our  stations  as  a  result  of  converting  to  full 
power.    We  performed  our  annual  impairment  tests  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2011,  and  did  not  recognize  any  impairment  as  a 
result of the assessments. Based on the annual qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment performed in 2011, we concluded 
that it was more likely than not that the fair values of all reporting units would sufficiently exceed their carrying value and thus it 
was not necessary to perform the quantitative two-step method.      

The qualitative factors for our reporting units reviewed during our 2012 and 2011 assessments, with the exception of the three 
markets  in  which  we  performed  a  quantitative  assessment,  indicated  stable  or  improving  margins  and  favorable  or  stable 
forecasted  economic  conditions  including  stable  discount  rates  and  comparable  business  multiples.  Additionally,  the  results  of 
prior quantitative assessments supported significant excess fair value over carrying value of our reporting units. 

As a result  of  our 2010 annual impairment test, we recorded an impairment charge  related to  our broadcast licenses of $4.6 
million.    Broadcast  licenses  were  impaired  in  7  of  35  markets  and  were  primarily  the  result  of  additional  cash  outflows  for 
increased signal strength necessary to maintain competitive market positions.  There was no impairment to goodwill in 2010 as all 
of our reporting units had fair values in excess of carrying values. 

2012 Annual Report  53  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
The carrying value, fair value and impairment loss of the broadcast licenses which were impaired during 2011 and 2010 were as 

follows (in thousands): 

Fair Value Measurements Using 

Quoted 
Prices in 
Active 
Markets for 
Identical 
Assets 
(Level 1) 

Significant 
Other 
Observable 
Inputs 
(Level 2) 

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs 
(Level 3) 

Carrying Value 

$  

$  

1,265 

$  

14,850 

$  

— 

— 

$  

$  

— 

$  

1,265 

— 

$  

14,850 

Total 
Impairment 
Losses 

$  

$  

398 

4,613 

Description 
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
Broadcast licenses (a) 

Year Ended December 31, 2010 
Broadcast licenses (a) 

(a)  The fair value above represents the fair value of the broadcast licenses that were impaired in 2011 and 2010 and written down to fair 
value.  It excludes carrying values of $45.7 million and $32.5 million related to broadcast licenses as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, 
respectively, which were not impaired during those years and had fair values in excess of carrying value. 

The  key  assumptions  used  to  determine  the  fair  value  of  our  broadcast  licenses  consist  of  discount  rates,  estimated  market 
revenues,  normalized  market  share,  normalized  profit  margin,  and  estimated  start-up  costs.  The  qualitative  factors  for  our 
broadcast licenses indicated an increase in market revenues, stable market shares and stable cost factors from 2011 to 2012.    The 
revenue, expense and constant growth rates used in determining the fair value of our broadcast licenses increased slightly from 
2010 to 2011.  The growth rates are based on market studies, industry knowledge and historical performance.  The discount rates 
used to determine the fair value of our broadcast licenses did not change significantly from 2011 to 2012 or 2010 to 2011.  The 
discount rate is based on a number of factors including market interest rates, a weighted average cost of capital analysis based on 
the target capital structure for a television station, and includes adjustments for market risk and company specific risk. 

The following table shows the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of definite-lived intangibles related to 

continuing operations (in thousands): 

Gross Carrying Amount 

As of December 31, 2012 

Accumulated 
Amortization 

Amortized intangible assets: 
Network affiliation (a) 
Decaying advertiser base (b) 
Other (c) 
Total 

$  

$  

580,929 
178,094 
195,103   
954,126 

$   (160,166) 
(121,919) 
(48,635) 
$   (330,720) 

Gross Carrying Amount 

As of December 31, 2011 

Accumulated 
Amortization 

Amortized intangible assets: 

Network affiliation 
Decaying advertiser base 
Other (d) 
Total 

$  

$  

244,900 
122,375 
106,243   
473,518 

$  

(141,202) 
(115,897) 
(41,078) 
$   (298,177) 

Net 

$  

$  

420,763 
56,175 
146,468   
623,406 

Net 

$  

$  

103,698 
6,478 
65,165   
175,341 

(a)  The increase in network affiliation assets includes amounts from acquisitions of $343.0 million. See  Note 2. Acquisitions for more 
information.  Amounts also reflect the reclassification of the amounts related to WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV to assets held for sale 
of  $6.9  million.    See  Discontinued Operations  under  Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for  more 
information. 

(b)  The increase in decaying advertiser base  includes  amounts from  acquisitions  of $56.9 million.  See  Note 2. Acquisitions for more 
information.  Amounts also reflect the reclassification of the amounts related to WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV to assets held for sale 

54  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
of  $1.2  million.    See  Discontinued Operations  under  Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for  more 
information. 

(c)  The increase in other intangible assets includes the amounts from acquisitions of $79.4 million.  See Note 2. Acquisitions for more 
information. Amounts also reflect the reclassification of the amounts related to WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV to assets held for sale 
of  $3.1  million.    See  Discontinued Operations  under  Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for  more 
information.  The increase also includes the purchase of additional alarm monitoring contracts of $13.9 million, which is included 
in the other operating divisions segment. 

(d)  During 2011, we purchased $8.9 million in additional alarm monitoring contracts related to a business within our other operating 

divisions. 

Definite-lived intangible assets and other assets subject to amortization are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their 
estimated  useful  lives  which  generally  range  from  5  to  25  years.    The  total  weighted  average  useful  life  of  all  definite-lived 
intangible assets and other assets subject to amortization acquired as a result of the acquisitions discussed in  Note 2. Acquisitions is 
14 years.  The amortization expense of the definite-lived intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 
was  $38.1  million,  $18.2  million  and  $18.8  million,  respectively.    We  analyze  specific  definite-lived  intangibles  for  impairment 
when events occur that may impact their value in accordance with the respective accounting guidance for long-lived assets.  There 
were no impairment charges recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.   

The following table shows the estimated amortization expense of the definite-lived intangible assets for the next five years (in 

thousands): 

For the year ended December 31, 2013 
For the year ended December 31, 2014 
For the year ended December 31, 2015 
For the year ended December 31, 2016 
For the year ended December 31, 2017 
Thereafter 

$   

$  

56,741 
55,634 
55,325 
55,111 
54,658 
345,937 
623,406 

6.  NOTES PAYABLE AND COMMERCIAL BANK FINANCING: 

In 2011, we entered into amendments (the Amendments) of our Bank Credit Agreement to help fund the acquisitions of Four 

Points and Freedom.  A summary of the changes on interest of these Amendments are as follows:   

  A new Term Loan A facility (Term Loan A).  The Term Loan A bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%.   
 

Interest on the Term Loan B  facility (Term Loan B)  was reduced to LIBOR  plus 3.00%  with a 1.00% LIBOR floor.  
The maturity date of the Term Loan B was extended to October 29, 2016. 

  We increased our revolving line of credit and extended the maturity from 2013 to be coterminous with the Term Loan A 
maturity  of  March  2016.    Pricing  on  the  revolving  line  of  credit  was  reduced  from  LIBOR  plus  4.00%  with  a  2.00% 
LIBOR floor down to LIBOR plus 2.25%, with no LIBOR floor.   

  We began to incur fees on the undrawn commitments beginning January 17, 2012.  The fees are calculated based on an 
annual rate of 0.5% for the Term Loan A, which increased to 1.0% after March 30, 2012, and 1.5% for the Term Loan B 
which increased to 3.0% after March 30, 2012.  

In January 2012, we drew $180.0 million of the incremental Term Loan B under our Bank Credit Agreement to fund the asset 
acquisition of Four Points, which closed January 1, 2012. In addition, in April 2012, we drew $157.5 million of the incremental 
Term Loan A and $192.5 million of the incremental Term Loan B under our Bank Credit Agreement to fund the asset acquisition 
of Freedom, which closed April 1, 2012.  As of December 31, 2012, we had $48.0 million drawn on our revolver. 

In September 2012, we further amended certain terms of our Bank Credit Agreement. The final terms of the amendment are as 

follows: 

  We increased our incremental uncommitted term loan capacity from $300.0 million to $500.0 million. Also under this 

new amendment,  

2012 Annual Report  55  

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  The  level  of  permitted  unsecured  indebtedness  increased  from  $450.0  million  to  $850.0  million,  subject  to  certain 
limitations, and we increased our ratio of our First Lien Indebtedness from 3.25 times EBITDA to 3.75 times EBITDA 
through December 31, 2014 with a decrease to 3.50 times EBITDA through maturity of the agreement.  

  Other amended terms provided us with increased television station acquisition capacity, more flexibility under the other 

restrictive covenants and prepayments of the existing term loans.  

  There were no changes pertaining to interest rates or maturities of the outstanding debt or commitments under the Bank 

Credit Agreement.  

Interest expense related to the Bank Credit Agreement, including the revolver, on our consolidated statement of operations was 
$35.7 million, $19.6 million and $23.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Included in 
these  amounts  were  debt  refinancing  costs  of  $6.3  million  and  $6.1  million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012  and 2011, 
respectively,  in  accordance  with  debt  modification  accounting  guidance  that  applied  to  the  amendments.    In  addition,  in 
connection with the amendments we capitalized $2.3 million and $5.5 million as deferred financing costs, which are included in 
other  assets  in  our  consolidated  financial  statements  during  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012  and  2011,  respectively.    The 
weighted average  effective  interest rate  of  the Term Loan B  for  the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 4.40% and 
4.96%, respectively.  The weighted average effective interest rate of the Term Loan A for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 
2011 was 2.53% and 2.45%, respectively.  

Our  Bank  Credit  Agreement  contains  certain  cross-default  provisions  with  certain  material  third-party  licensees.    As  of 
December 31, 2012, Cunningham was the sole material third party licensee as defined in our Bank Credit Agreement.  A default 
by a material third-party licensee under our agreements with such parties, including a default caused by insolvency, would cause an 
event  of  default  under  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement.  As  of  December  31,  2012,  Cunningham  had  repaid  the  total  outstanding 
principal balance of their term loan facility. 

On October 12, 2012, we issued $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes, which bear interest at a rate of 6.125% per annum 
and mature on October 1, 2022 (the 6.125% Notes), pursuant to an indenture dated October 12, 2012 (the 2012 Indenture).  The 
6.125%  Notes  were  priced  at  100%  of  their  par  value  and  interest  is  payable  semi-annually  on  April  1  and  October  1, 
commencing on April 1, 2013. Prior to October 1, 2017, we may redeem the 6.125% Notes, in whole or in part, at any time or 
from time to time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 6.125% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, 
to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium as set forth in the 2012 Indenture.  Beginning on October 1, 2017, we may 
redeem some or all of the 6.125% Notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price set forth in the 2012 Indenture.  
In addition, on or prior to October 1, 2015, we may redeem up to 35% of  the 6.125% Notes using proceeds of  certain equity 
offerings.  Upon the sale of certain of our assets or certain changes of control, the holders of the 6.125% Notes may require us to 
repurchase some or all of the notes.  The net proceeds from the offering of the 6.125% Notes were used to pay down outstanding 
indebtedness under the revolving credit facility under our Bank Credit Agreement and fund the acquisitions as described under 
Note 2. Acquisitions, and for general corporate purposes. Concurrent with entering into the 2012 Indenture, we also entered into a 
registration rights agreement requiring us to complete an offer of an exchange of the 6.125% Notes for registered securities with 
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the SEC)  by July 8, 2013.  As of  December 31, 2012, we capitalized $9.1 million in 
estimated fees to deferred financing costs, which are included in other assets in our consolidated financial statements.   

Interest expense was $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.  The weighted average effective interest rate for the 

6.125% Notes was 6.125% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

On October 4, 2010, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, which bear interest at a 
rate of 8.375% per annum and mature on October 15, 2018 (the 8.375% Notes), pursuant to an indenture dated as of October 4, 
2010 (the 2010 Indenture).  The 8.375% were issued at 98.567% of their par value and interest is payable semi-annually on April 
15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on April 15, 2011.  Prior to October 15, 2014, we may redeem the 8.375% Notes in 
whole or in part, at any time or from time to time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.375% Notes plus 
accrued and unpaid interest, plus a “make-whole premium” as set forth in the 2010 Indenture.  Beginning on October 15, 2014, 
we may redeem some or all of the 8.375% Notes at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the 2010 
Indenture.  In addition, on or prior to October 15, 2013, we may redeem up to 35% of the 8.375% Notes using the proceeds of 
certain equity offerings.  Upon certain changes of control, we must offer to purchase the 8.375% Notes at a price equal to 101% 
of the face amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The net proceeds from the offering of the 8.375% Notes were 
used to fund the tender offers for our 6.0% and 8.0% Notes described below. Upon the sale of certain of our assets or certain 
changes of control, the holders of the 8.375% Notes may require us to repurchase some or all of the 8.375% Notes.  Concurrent 
to entering into the 2010 Indenture we also entered into a registration rights agreement requiring us to complete an offer of an 

56  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
exchange  of  the  8.375%  Notes  for  registered  securities  with  the  SEC  by  July  1,  2011.    The  8.375%  Notes  registration  became 
effective on November 23, 2010.     

In 2011, we repurchased, in the open market, $12.5 million principal amount of the 8.375% Notes.  We recognized a loss on 
these extinguishments  of  $0.3  million.   As of  December 31,  2012, the principal amount of  the outstanding 8.375% Notes was 
$237.5 million. 

Interest  expense  was  $20.2  million,  $21.0  million  and  $5.1  million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010, 
respectively.  The weighted average effective interest rate of the 8.375% Notes, including amortization of its bond discount, was 
8.62% and 8.64% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.   

On October 29, 2009, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes, which bear interest at a rate 
of 9.25% per annum and mature on November 1, 2017 (the 9.25% Notes), pursuant to an indenture dated as of October 29, 2009 
(the 2009 Indenture).  The 9.25% Notes were issued at 97.264% of their par value and interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 
and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2010.  Prior to November 1, 2013, we may redeem the 9.25% Notes in 
whole, but not in part, at any time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 9.25% Notes plus accrued and unpaid 
interest,  plus  a  “make-whole  premium”  as  set  forth  in  the  2009  Indenture.    Beginning  on  November  1,  2013,  we  may  redeem 
some or all of the 9.25% Notes at any time or from time to time at the redemption prices set forth in the 2009 Indenture.  Upon 
the sale of certain of our assets or certain changes of control, the holders of the 9.25% Notes may require us to repurchase some 
or all of the 9.25% Notes.  The 9.25% Notes are collateralized by $2,037.5 million of our tangible and intangible assets. 

Interest  expense  was  $47.7  million,  $47.6  million  and  $47.3  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010, 
respectively.  The weighted average effective interest rate for the 9.25% Notes, including the amortization of its bond discount, 
was 9.74% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. 

Any holder of the 4.875% Convertible Senior Notes (the 4.875% Notes) may surrender all or any portion of their notes for a 
conversion into our Class A Common Stock at any time. As of December 31, 2012, the conversion price of the 4.875% Notes 
was $22.37  per share and the number of  Class A Common  Stock that would be delivered upon conversion was 254,128.  The 
4.875% Notes bore cash interest at an annual rate of 4.875% until January 15, 2011 and now bear cash interest at an annual rate 
of  2.00%  from  January  15,  2011  through  maturity,  July  15,  2018.    The  principal  amount  of  the  4.875%  Notes  will  accrete  to 
125.66% of the original par amount from January 15, 2011 to maturity.  As of January 15, 2011, no put rights were exercised for 
the 4.875% Notes and the put right expired. 

Upon  certain  conditions,  the  3.0%  Convertible  Senior  Notes  (the  3.0%  Notes)  are  convertible  into  cash  and,  in  certain 
circumstances, shares of Class A Common Stock at any time on or before November 15, 2026.  Holders of the 3.0% Notes will 
have the right on May 15, 2017 and May 15, 2022, or any other such date to be determined by us at a repurchase price payable in 
cash equal to the aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (including contingent cash interest), if any, through 
the repurchase date. As of December 31, 2012, the conversion price of the 3.0% Notes was $17.35 per share and the number of 
Class A Common Stock that would be delivered upon conversion was 311,239.  The 3.0% Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 
3.0%, payable semi-annually in May and November.  We recorded the difference between the initial proceeds received from the 
debt issuance and the fair value of the liability component of the debt as a discount.  The 3.0% Notes mature on May 15, 2027.   

During 2010, we completed tender offers to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding 3.0% Notes and 4.875% Notes at 
100%  of  the  face  value  of  such  notes.    We  redeemed  approximately  $12.3  million  and  $14.3  million  of  the  3.0%  and  4.875% 
Notes, respectively.  Additionally, during 2010, the put right period for the 3.0% Notes expired and holders representing $10.0 
million in principal amount of the 3.0% Notes exercised their put rights.  During the third quarter of 2010, we redeemed $17.0 
million of the 4.875% Notes in a private transaction.   

As of December 31, 2012, we have embedded derivatives related to contingent cash interest features in our 4.875% Notes and 

3.0% Notes, which had negligible fair values. 

Interest expense for the 4.875% Notes was $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 
2011 and 2010, respectively.  Interest expense for  the 3.0%  Notes was $0.2 million, $0.2  million and $0.5 million, respectively.  
The weighted average effective interest rate for the 4.875% Notes was 4.84% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.  
The weighted average effective interest rate on the liability portion of the 3.0% Notes was 3.0% for the years ended December 31, 
2012 and 2011.   

2012 Annual Report  57  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In 2002 and 2003, we issued $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.0% Senior Subordinated Notes, due 2012 (the 8.0% 
Notes).  Interest on the 8.0% Notes was paid semiannually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 
2002.  The 8.0% Notes were issued under an indenture among us, certain of our subsidiaries (the guarantors) and the trustee.   

On September 20, 2010, we commenced a tender offer to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding 8.0% Notes.  We 
offered to purchase the 8.0% Notes at a purchase price of $1,002.50 per $1,000 principal amount, if tendered within the first ten 
business  days  of  the  tender  offer  period  or  $972.50  per  $1,000  principal  amount  if  tendered  after  such  time,  plus  accrued  and 
unpaid  interest.    The  tender  offers  expired  October  19,  2010  and  approximately  $175.7  million  principal  amount  of  the  8.0% 
Notes  were  tendered  and  purchased.    On  November  19,  2010,  we  completed  the  redemption  of  the  remaining  $49.0  million 
outstanding of 8.0% Notes.  These notes were redeemed for cash at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the 
8.0%  Notes  plus  accrued  and unpaid  interest.    The  redemption  of  the  notes  was  effected  in  accordance  with  the  terms  of  the 
indenture governing the notes and was funded from the net proceeds of the 8.375% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2018 (8.375% 
Notes)  offering  described  above  and  available  cash  on  hand.    As  a  result  of  these  redemptions,  we  recorded  a  gain  from 
extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

Interest expense was $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The weighted average effective interest rate for the 

8.0% Notes including the amortization of its bond premium was 7.88% for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

In 2005, we completed an exchange of our Series D Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock) into 6.0% 
Convertible Debentures, due 2012 (the 6.0% Notes).  The 6.0% Notes were due to mature September 15, 2012, and bore interest 
at a rate of 6.0% per annum, payable quarterly on each March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, beginning September 
15, 2005.  The 6.0% Notes were convertible into Class A Common Stock at the option of the holders at a conversion price of 
$22.813 per share, subject to adjustment.  The difference in the carrying amount of the Preferred Stock and the fair value of the 
6.0% Notes was recorded as a $31.7 million discount on the 6.0% Notes and was being amortized over the life of the 6.0% Notes 
using the effective interest method.   

During 2010, we repurchased, on the open market, $6.1 million in principal amount of the 6.0% Notes.  In September 2010, we 
commenced  tender  offers  to  purchase  for  cash  up  to  $60.0  million  in  principal  amount  of  the  outstanding  6.0%  Notes.    We 
offered to purchase the 6.0% Notes at a purchase price of $987.50 per $1,000 principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.  
The  tender  offer  expired  October  19,  2010  and  approximately  $58.0  million  of  the  6.0%  Notes  were  tendered  and  purchased.  
The net proceeds from the offering of the 8.375% Notes described below and cash on hand were used to fund this tender offer.   

In April 2011, we completed the redemption of  the remaining $70.0 million of outstanding 6.0% Notes at 100% of the face 
value of such notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.  The redemption of the 6.0% Notes was effected in accordance with the 
terms of the indenture governing the 6.0% Notes and was funded from the net proceeds of our new Term Loan A.  As a result of 
this redemption, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

Interest  expense  was  $1.9  million  and  $10.6  million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2011  and  2010,  respectively.    The 
weighted average effective interest rate for the 6.0% Notes including the amortization of its bond discount was 9.18% and 8.96% 
for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 

Deerfield,  one  of  our  consolidated  VIEs,  entered  into  a  $27.1  million  credit  agreement  with  a  third  party  on  November  30, 
2012 in order to purchase the license assets of certain stations. See  Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting 
Policies and Note 2. Acquisitions for more information.  The credit agreement matures on November 30, 2017 and bears interest of 
LIBOR plus 2.50%.  We have jointly and severally, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed the debt of Deerfield, as a primary 
obligor, including the payment of all unpaid principal of and interest on the loans.   

As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding principal amount of the debt was $20.0 million.  For the year ended December 31, 
2012, the interest expense relating to Deerfield’s term loan facility was $0.1 million and the interest rate as of December 31, 2012 
was 2.81%.   

58  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cunningham, one of our consolidated VIEs, held a $33.5 million term loan facility originally entered into in March 2002, with 
an unrelated third party.  Primarily all of  Cunningham’s assets was collateral for  its term loan facility, which  was non-recourse.  
The interest rate of the term loan was LIBOR plus 4.50% with a 2.00% floor.  The facility was paid in full as of October 1, 2012. 
See Note 11. Related Person Transactions for more information. 

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the interest expense relating to Cunningham’s term loan facility was 

$0.3 million, $1.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively.   

Other  operating  divisions  segment  debt  includes  the  debt  of  our  consolidated  subsidiaries  with  non-broadcast  related 
operations.  This debt is non-recourse to us.  Interest is paid on this debt at rates typically ranging from LIBOR plus 2.5% to a 
fixed  6.11%  during  2012.    During  2012,  2011  and  2010,  interest  expense  on  this  debt  was  $3.1  million,  $3.7  million  and  $4.3 
million, respectively. 

Notes payable, capital leases and the Bank Credit Agreement consisted of the following as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in 

thousands):   

Bank Credit Agreement, Term Loan A 
Bank Credit Agreement, Term Loan B 
Revolving Credit Facility 
9.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, due 2017 
8.375% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2018 
4.875% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2018 
6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2022 
3.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2027 
Deerfield Bank Credit Facility 
Cunningham Term Loan Facility (non-recourse) 
Other operating divisions segment debt (all non-recourse) 
Capital leases 
     Total outstanding principal 
Plus:  Accretion on 4.875% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2018 
Less: Discount on Bank Credit Agreement, Term Loan B 
Less: Discount on 9.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, due 2017 
Less: Discount on 8.375% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2018 
Less: Current portion 
     Net carrying value 

2012 
$  263,875 
587,656 
48,000 
500,000 
237,530 
5,685 
500,000 
5,400 
19,950 
— 
65,663 
43,364 
2,277,123 
332 
(6,807) 
(9,483) 
(2,677) 
(47,622) 
  $  2,210,866 

2011 
$  115,000 
221,700 
12,000 
500,000 
237,530 
5,685 
— 
5,400 
— 
10,967 
51,614 
45,075 
1,204,971 
158 
(4,698) 
(10,947) 
(3,018) 
(38,195) 
    $  1,148,271 

2012 Annual Report  59  

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indebtedness  under  the  notes  payable,  capital  leases  and  the  Bank  Credit  Agreement  as  of  December  31,  2012  matures  as 

follows (in thousands): 

2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
2018 and thereafter 
Total minimum payments 
Less: Discount on Term Loan B 
Less: Discount on 9.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, 

due 2017 

Less: Discount on 8.375% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2018 
Less: Amount representing future interest 

$  

Notes and Bank 
Credit  
Agreement  
46,805 
34,866 
64,374 
810,514 
511,970 
766,689 
2,235,218 
(6,807) 

Capital Leases 
$   

6,169 
6,247 
5,435 
5,033 
5,078 
49,324 
77,286 
— 

$  

Total 
52,974 
41,113 
69,809 
815,547 
517,048 
816,013 
2,312,504 
(6,807) 

(9,483) 
(2,677) 
(1,127) 
2,215,124 

$  

— 
— 
(33,922) 
43,364 

(9,483) 
(2,677) 
(35,049) 
$   2,258,488 

$  

Our Bank Credit Agreement and indentures governing our outstanding notes contain a number of covenants that, among other 
things,  restrict  our  ability  and  our  subsidiaries’  ability  to  incur  additional  indebtedness,  pay  dividends,  incur  liens,  engage  in 
mergers or consolidations, make acquisitions, investments or disposals and engage in activities with affiliates.  In addition, under 
the Bank Credit Agreement, we are required to satisfy specified financial ratios.  As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance 
with all financial ratios and covenants. 

Substantially all of our stock in our wholly-owned subsidiaries has been pledged as security for the Bank Credit Agreement.   

As  of  December  31,  2012,  our  broadcast  segment  had  29  capital  leases  with  non-affiliates,  including  26  tower  leases,  two 
building leases and one software lease; our other operating divisions segment had six capital equipment leases and corporate  has 
one building lease.  All of our tower leases will expire within the next 19 years and the building leases will expire within the next 4 
years.  Most of our leases have 5-10 year renewal options and it is expected that these leases will be renewed or replaced within 
the normal course of business.  For more information related to our affiliate notes and capital leases, see  Note 11. Related Person 
Transactions. 

7.  PROGRAM CONTRACTS: 

Future payments required under program contracts as of December 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands): 

2013 
2014 
2015 
2016  
Total 
Less: Current portion 
Long-term portion of program contracts payable 

$   

$   

88,015 
10,994 
5,148 
199 
104,356 
(88,015) 
16,341 

Each future periods’ film liability includes contractual amounts owed, however, what is contractually owed does not necessarily 
reflect what we are expected to pay during that period.  While we are contractually bound to make the payments reflected in the 
table during the indicated periods, industry protocol typically enables us to make film payments on a three-month lag.  Included in 
the  current  portion  amounts  are  payments  due  in  arrears  of  $20.0  million.    In  addition,  we  have  entered  into  non-cancelable 
commitments for future program rights aggregating to $140.5 million as of December 31, 2012. 

60  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.  COMMON STOCK: 

Holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to ten 
votes per share, except for votes relating to “going private” and certain other transactions.  The Class A Common Stock and the 
Class  B  Common  Stock  vote  together  as  a  single  class,  except  as  otherwise  may  be  required  by  Maryland  law,  on  all  matters 
presented for a vote.  Holders of Class B Common Stock may at any time convert their shares into the same number of shares of 
Class A Common Stock.  During 2011, 1,149,960 Class B Common Stock shares were converted into Class A Common Stock 
shares.  There were no Class B Common Stock shares converted into Class A Common Stock shares in 2012. 

Our Bank Credit Agreement and some of our subordinated debt instruments have restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.  
Under  our  Bank  Credit  Agreement,  in  certain  circumstances,  we  may  make  up  to  $100.0  million  in  unrestricted  annual  cash 
payments including but not limited to dividends, of which $50.0 million may carry over to the next year.  Under the indentures 
governing the 9.25% Notes, 8.375% Notes and 6.125% Notes, we are restricted from paying dividends on  our common stock 
unless certain specified conditions are satisfied, including that: 

 

 

no  event  of  default  then  exists  under  the  indenture  or  certain  other  specified  agreements  relating  to  our 
indebtedness; and 
after taking into account the dividends payment, we are within certain restricted payment requirements contained in 
the indenture. 

In addition, under certain of our debt instruments, the payment of dividends is not permissible during a default thereunder.   

During 2011, our Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends on common stock, of $0.12 per share. Dividends of $0.12 
per share were paid in March 2011, June 2011, September 2011 and December 2011, for total dividend payments of $0.48 per 
share for  the year ended December 31, 2011.   During 2012, our Board of  Directors declared a quarterly dividend of  $0.12 per 
share in the months of February and May, which were paid in March and June, and $0.15 per share in the months of August and 
November,  which  were  paid  in  September  and  December.    A  special  cash  dividend  of  $1.00  per  share  was  also  declared  in 
November 2012, which was paid in December, for total dividend payments of $1.54 per share for the year ended December 31, 
2012.  In  February  2013,  our  Board  of  Directors  declared  a  quarterly  dividend  of  $0.15  per  share.  Future  dividends  on  our 
common shares, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on several factors including our results 
of  operations,  cash  requirements  and  surplus,  financial  condition,  covenant  restrictions  and  other  factors  that  the  Board  of 
Directors may deem relevant.  The Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock holders have the same rights related to 
dividends. 

9.  INCOME TAXES: 

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in 

thousands): 

Provision for income taxes - continuing operations 
Provision for income taxes - discontinued operations 

Current: 

Federal 
State 

Deferred: 

Federal 
State 

2012 
67,852 
663 
68,515 

56,106 
4,095 
60,201 

9,151 
(837) 
8,314 
68,515 

$   

$   

$   

$   

2011 
44,785 
477 
45,262 

678 
1,055 
1,733 

41,361 
2,168 
43,529 
45,262 

$   

$   

$   

$   

2010 
40,226 
77 
40,303 

1,263 
596 
1,859 

37,010 
1,434 
38,444 
40,303 

$   

$   

$   

$   

2012 Annual Report  61  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  is  a  reconciliation  of  federal  income  taxes  at  the  applicable  statutory  rate  to  the  recorded  provision  from 

continuing operations: 

Federal statutory rate 
Adjustments- 

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit 
Non-deductible expenses 
Basis in subsidiaries stock     
Taxes on consolidated VIEs 

    Other 
Effective income tax rate  

2012 
35.0% 

1.3% 
0.3% 
—% 
(3.4%) 
(1.2%) 
32.0% 

2011 
35.0% 

1.7% 
0.4% 
—% 
(0.7%) 
0.6% 
37.0% 

2010 
35.0% 

1.5% 
0.4% 
(2.1%) 
(1.2%) 
0.8% 
34.4% 

We  recorded  a  deferred  tax  benefit  of  $2.5  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2010  related  to  the  recovery  of 

historical losses attributable to the basis in stock of certain subsidiaries.   

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the taxes on consolidated VIEs include a release of $7.7 million of valuation allowance 
related  to  certain  deferred  tax  assets  of  Cunningham,  one  of  our  consolidated  VIEs,  as  the  weight  of  all  available  evidence 
supports  realization  of  the  deferred  tax  assets.    This  assessment  was  based  primarily  on  the  sufficiency  of  forecasted  taxable 
income necessary to utilize net operating loss carryforwards expiring in years 2022  – 2029.  This VIE files separate income tax 
returns.  Any resulting tax liabilities are nonrecourse to us, and we are not entitled to any benefit resulting from the deferred tax 
assets of the VIE.   

Temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities give rise to 
deferred taxes.  As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, total deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, including those classified 
as held for sale of $1.3 million, as of December 31, 2012, were as follows (in thousands): 

Current and Long-Term Deferred Tax Assets: 

Net operating and capital losses: 

Federal 
State 

Broadcast licenses 
Intangibles 
Other 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets 

Total deferred tax assets 

Current and Long-Term Deferred Tax Liabilities: 

Broadcast licenses 
Intangibles 
Property & equipment, net  
Contingent interest obligations 
Other 

Total deferred tax liabilities 

Net tax liabilities 

2012 

2011 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

5,738 
66,990 
29,170 
5,871 
33,803 
141,572 
(59,407) 
82,165 

(13,090) 
(216,505) 
(25,359) 
(52,388) 
(10,213) 
(317,555) 
(235,390) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,550 
87,623 
18,087 
5,390 
20,965 
133,615 
(79,136) 
54,479 

(10,115) 
(204,230) 
(24,877) 
(52,298) 
(5,571) 
(297,091) 
(242,612) 

Our remaining federal and state capital and net operating losses will expire during various years from 2013 to 2032.   

As discussed in Note 1. Income taxes, we establish valuation allowances in accordance with the guidance related to accounting for 
income taxes.  As of December 31, 2012, a valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets related to a substantial 
portion of our available state net operating loss carryforwards, based on past operating results, expected timing of the reversals of 
existing temporary book/tax basis differences, alternative tax strategies and projected future taxable income. Although realization 
is not assured for the remaining deferred tax assets, we believe it is more likely than not  that they will be realized in the future.  
During the year ended December 31, 2012, we decreased our valuation allowance by $19.7 million. The reduction in valuation 
allowance was primarily due to the settlement of several audits, which resulted in the utilization of certain state net operating loss 
carryforwards  which  were  previously  fully  reserved, as  well as  due  to  changes  in  estimates  of  apportionment  for  certain states.  
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we increased our valuation allowance by $1.6 million, from $77.6 million, and during 
the year December 31, 2010, we increased our valuation allowance by $0.7 million, from $76.8 million. The change in valuation 
allowance was primarily due to the creation of additional state net operating loss carryforwards.  

62  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $26.0 million and $26.1 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, respectively.  
Of this total, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, $15.0 and $15.1 million respectively (net of federal effect on state 
tax issues) and $6.8 million for both years (net of federal effect on state tax issues) represent the amounts of unrecognized tax 
benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect our effective tax rates from continuing operations and discontinued operations, 
respectively.   

The following table summarizes the activity related to our accrued unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands): 

Balance at January 1, 

(Reductions) increases related to prior years tax 

position 

Increases related to current year tax positions 
Reductions related to settlements with taxing 

authorities 

Reductions related to expiration of the 

applicable statute of limitations 

Balance at December 31, 

2012 
26,088 

$ 

(123)  
— 

— 

— 
25,965 

$ 

2011 
26,125 

(127)  
90 

— 

— 
26,088 

$ 

$ 

2010 
26,148 

(210)  
187 

— 

— 
26,125 

$ 

$ 

In  addition,  we  recognize  accrued  interest  and  penalties  related  to  unrecognized  tax  benefits  in  income  tax  expense.    We 
recognized $1.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.0 million of income tax expense for interest related to uncertain tax positions for the 
years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.   

Management  periodically  performs  a  comprehensive  review  of  our  tax  positions  and  accrues  amounts  for  tax  contingencies.  
Based  on  these  reviews,  the  status  of  ongoing  audits  and  the  expiration  of  applicable  statute  of  limitations,  these  accruals  are 
adjusted  as  necessary.    Amounts  accrued  for  these  tax  matters  are  included  in  the  table  above  and  long-term  liabilities  in  our 
consolidated balance sheets.  We believe that adequate accruals have been provided for all years.   

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions.  All of our 2009 and subsequent 
federal and state tax returns remain subject to examination by various tax authorities.  Some of our pre-2009 federal and state tax 
returns  may  also  be  subject  to  examination.    In  addition,  our  2006  and  2007  federal  tax  returns  are  currently  under  audit,  and 
several of our subsidiaries are currently under state examinations for various years.  We do not anticipate the resolution of these 
matters will result in a material change to our consolidated financial statements.  In addition, we believe it is reasonably  possible 
that our liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to continuing and certain discontinued operations will be reduced by $1.2 
million  and  $5.1  million,  respectively,  in  the  next  twelve  months  as  a  result  of  expected  statute  of  limitations  expirations,  the 
application  of  limits  under  available  state  administrative  practice  exceptions,  and  the  resolution  of  examination  issues  and 
expected settlements with federal and certain state tax authorities. 

10.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: 

We are a party to lawsuits and claims from time to time in the ordinary course of business.  Actions currently pending are in 
various stages and no material judgments or decisions have been rendered by hearing boards or courts in connection with such 
actions.    After  reviewing  developments  to  date  with  legal  counsel,  our  management  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  outcome  of  our 
pending  and  threatened  matters  will  not  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  consolidated  balance  sheets,  consolidated 
statements of operations or consolidated statements of cash flows.   

Various  parties  have  filed  petitions  to  deny  our  applications  or  our  LMA  partners’  applications  for  the  following  stations’ 
license renewals: WXLV-TV,  Winston-Salem, North Carolina; WMYV-TV, Greensboro, North Carolina; WLFL-TV, Raleigh / 
Durham, North Carolina; WRDC-TV, Raleigh / Durham, North Carolina; WLOS-TV, Asheville, North Carolina, WMMP-TV, 
Charleston,  South  Carolina;  WTAT-TV,  Charleston,  South  Carolina;  WMYA-TV,  Anderson,  South  Carolina;  WICS-TV 
Springfield, Illinois; WBFF-TV, Baltimore, Maryland; KGAN-TV, Cedar Rapids, Iowa WTTE-TV, Columbus, Ohio; WRGT-TV, 
Dayton, Ohio; WVAH, Charleston / Huntington, West Virginia and WCGV-TV in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  The FCC is in the 
process of considering the renewal applications and we believe the petitions have no merit. 

2012 Annual Report  63  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have entered into operating leases for certain property and equipment under terms ranging from one to 40 years.  The rent 
expense  from  continuing  operations  under  these  leases,  as  well  as  certain  leases  under  month-to-month  arrangements,  for  the 
years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $6.7 million, $3.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively.    

 Future minimum payments under the leases are as follows (in thousands): 

2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017  
2018 and thereafter 

$ 

$ 

4,682 
4,512 
3,820 
3,557 
3,863 
4,316 
24,750 

We had no material outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2012. 

On May 14, 2012, the Company and the licensees of stations to which we provide services, representing 20  affiliates of  Fox 
Broadcast Company (FOX), extended the network affiliation agreements with FOX from the existing term of December 31, 2012 
to December 31, 2017.  Concurrently, we entered into an assignable option agreement with Fox Television Stations, Inc. (FTS) 
giving us or our assignee the right to purchase substantially all the assets of the WUTB station (Baltimore, MD) owned by FTS, 
which has a program service arrangement with MyNetworkTV, for $2.7 million.  In October 2012, we exercised our option and 
entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of WUTB and we expect the sale to close in the first quarter of 2013 subject to 
FCC  approval  and  other  closing  conditions.    We  also  entered  into  an  option  agreement  giving  FTS  the  right  to  purchase  our 
stations  in  up  to  three  of  the  following  four  markets:  Las  Vegas,  NV,  Raleigh,  NC,  Norfolk,  VA,  and  Cincinnati,  OH.  Our 
stations  in  these  markets  are  affiliated  with  the  following  networks  or  program  service  providers:  Las  Vegas  (The  CW  and 
MyNetworkTV),  Raleigh  (The  CW  and  MyNetworkTV),  Norfolk  (MyNetworkTV)  and  Cincinnati  (MyNetworkTV).    These 
options were exercisable between July 1, 2012 and March 30, 2013, however, FOX notified us of their intent to not exercise these 
options  in  January  2013.  In  the  second  quarter  of  2012,  we  paid  $25.0  million  to  FOX  pursuant  to  the  agreements,  which  is 
reflected as cash flows used in operating activities within the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended  December 
31,  2012.  During  the  second  quarter  of  2012,  we  recorded  $50.0  million  in  other  assets  and  $25.0  million  of  other  accrued 
liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet, representing the additional obligation due to FOX in April 2013 because FTS did 
not exercise its option to acquire any of our stations.  The $50.0 million asset is being amortized through the current term  of the 
affiliation agreement ending on December 31, 2017.  Approximately $5.6 million of amortization expense has been recorded in 
the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2012.  In addition, we are required to pay to FOX 
programming  payments  under  the  terms  of  the  affiliation  agreements.    These  payments  are  recorded  in  station  production 
expenses as incurred.   

Certain of our stations have entered into what have commonly been referred to as local marketing agreements or LMAs.  One 
typical  type  of  LMA  is  a  programming  agreement  between  two  separately  owned  television  stations  serving  the  same  market, 
whereby  the  licensee  of  one  station  programs  substantial  portions  of  the  broadcast  day  and  sells  advertising  time  during  such 
programming  segments  on  the  other  licensee’s  station  subject  to  the  latter  licensee’s  ultimate  editorial  and  other  controls.    We 
believe these arrangements allow us to reduce our operating expenses and enhance profitability.   

If we are required to terminate or modify our LMAs, our business could be affected in the following ways: 

Losses on investments.    In  some  cases,  we  own  the  non-license  assets  used  by  the  stations  we  operate  under  LMAs.    If 
certain  of  these  LMA  arrangements  are  no  longer  permitted,  we  would  be  forced  to  sell  these  assets,  restructure  our 
agreements or find another use for them.  If this happens, the market for such assets may not be as good as when we 
purchased them and, therefore, we cannot be certain of a favorable return on our original investments. 

Termination penalties.  If the FCC requires us to modify or terminate existing LMAs before the terms of the LMAs expire, 
or  under certain  circumstances,  we  elect  not  to  extend  the  terms  of  the  LMAs,  we  may  be forced  to  pay  termination 
penalties under the terms of some of our LMAs.  Any such termination penalties could be material.   

64  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following paragraphs discuss various proceedings relevant to our LMAs. 

In 1999, the FCC established a new local television ownership rule.  LMAs fell under this rule, however the rule grandfathered 
LMAs that were entered into prior to November 5, 1996, and permitted the applicable stations to continue operations pursuant to 
the LMAs until the conclusion of  the FCC’s 2004 biennial review.  The FCC stated it would conduct a case-by-case review of 
grandfathered LMAs and assess the appropriateness of extending the grandfathering periods.  The FCC did not initiate any review 
of grandfathered LMAs in 2004 or as part of its 2006 quadrennial review.  We do not know when, or if, the FCC will conduct any 
such review of grandfathered LMAs.  For LMAs executed on or after November 5, 1996, the FCC required compliance with the 
1999 local television ownership rule by August 6, 2001.  We challenged the 1999 rules in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 
Circuit (D.C. Circuit), resulting in the exclusion of post-November 5, 1996 LMAs from the 1999 rules.  In 2002, the D.C. Circuit 
ruled  in  Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. F.C.C.,  284  F.3d  114  (D.C.  Cir.  2002)  that  the  1999  local  television  ownership  rule  was 
arbitrary and capricious and sent the rule back to the FCC for further refinement.   

In 2003, the FCC revised its ownership rules, including the local television ownership rule; however the U. S. Court of Appeals 
for the Third Circuit (Third Circuit) did not enable the 2003 rules to become effective and sent the 2003 rules back to the FCC 
for further refinement.  Due to the court decisions, the FCC concluded the 1999 rules could not be justified as necessary in  the 
public interest and as a result, we took the position that an issue exists regarding whether the FCC has any current legal right to 
enforce any rules prohibiting the acquisition of television stations.  Several parties, including us, filed petitions with the Supreme 
Court of the United States seeking review of the Third Circuit decision, but the Supreme Court denied the petitions in June 2005.   

In  July  2006,  the  FCC  released  a  Further  Notice  of  Proposed  Rule  Making  seeking  comment  on  how  to  address  the  issues 
raised by the Third Circuit’s decision.  In January 2008, the FCC released an order containing ownership rules that re-adopted the 
1999  rules.    On  February  29,  2008,  several  parties,  including  us,  separately  filed  petitions  for  review  in  a  number  of  federal 
appellate courts challenging the 1999 rules.  Those petitions were consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 
(Ninth Circuit) and in November 2008, transferred by the Ninth Circuit to the Third Circuit.  On July 7, 2011, the Third Circuit 
upheld the FCC’s local television ownership rules. On December 5, 2011, we joined with a number of other parties on a Petition 
for a Writ of Certiorari filed with the Supreme Court requesting that the Court overrule the decision of the Third Circuit. That 
request remains pending before the Supreme Court. 

On  November  15,  1999,  we  entered  into  an  agreement  to  acquire  WMYA-TV  (formerly  WBSC-TV)  in  Anderson,  South 
Carolina from Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation (Cunningham), but that transaction was denied by the FCC.  Since none of 
the FCC rule changes ever became effective, we filed a petition for reconsideration with the FCC and amended our application to 
acquire the license of WMYA-TV.  We also filed applications in November 2003 to acquire the license assets of, at that time, the 
remaining  five  Cunningham  stations:  WRGT-TV,  Dayton,  Ohio;  WTAT-TV,  Charleston,  South  Carolina;  WVAH-TV, 
Charleston,  West  Virginia;  WNUV-TV,  Baltimore,  Maryland;  and  WTTE-TV,  Columbus,  Ohio.    Rainbow  /  PUSH  filed  a 
petition  to  deny  these  five  applications  and  to  revoke  all  of our  licenses.    The  FCC  dismissed  our  applications  and  denied  the 
Rainbow  /  PUSH  petition  due  to  the  abovementioned  2003  Third  Circuit  decision.    Rainbow  /  PUSH  filed  a  petition  for 
reconsideration of that denial and we filed an application for review of the dismissal.  In 2005, we filed a petition with the D. C. 
Circuit  requesting  that  the  Court  direct  the  FCC  to  take  final  action  on  our  applications,  but  that  petition  was  dismissed.    On 
January 6, 2006, we submitted a motion to the FCC requesting that it take final action on our applications.  The applications and 
the associated petition to deny are still pending.  We believe the Rainbow / PUSH petition is without merit.  On February 8, 2008, 
we filed a petition with the D.C. Circuit requesting that the Court direct the FCC to act on our applications and cease its use of 
the  1999  rules.    In  July  2008,  the  D.C.  Circuit  transferred  the  case  to  the  Ninth  Circuit,  and  we  filed a  petition  with  the  D.C. 
Circuit challenging that decision; however, it was denied.  We also filed with the Ninth Circuit a motion to transfer that case back 
to the D.C. Circuit.  In November 2008, the Ninth Circuit consolidated and sent our petition seeking final FCC action on our 
applications  to  the  Third  Circuit.    In  December  2008,  we  agreed  voluntarily  with  the  parties  to  our  proceeding  to  dismiss  our 
petition seeking final FCC action on our applications.   

11.  RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS: 

Transactions  with  our  controlling  shareholders.  David,  Frederick,  J.  Duncan  and  Robert  Smith  (collectively,  the  controlling 
shareholders) are brothers and hold substantially all of the Class B Common Stock and some of our Class A Common Stock.  We 
engaged in the following transactions with them and/or entities in which they have substantial interests.  

Leases.  Certain  assets  used  by  us  and  our  operating  subsidiaries  are  leased  from  Cunningham  Communications  Inc.,  Keyser 
Investment  Group,  Gerstell  Development  Limited  Partnership  and  Beaver  Dam,  LLC  (entities  owned  by  the  controlling 
shareholders).    Lease  payments  made  to  these  entities  were  $4.7  million,  $4.4  million  and  $4.5  million  for  the  years  ended 
December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 

2012 Annual Report  65  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bay TV.  In January 1999, we entered into a LMA with Bay TV, which owns the television station WTTA-TV in Tampa / St. 
Petersburg,  Florida  market.    Each  of  our  controlling  shareholders  owns  a  substantial  portion  of  the  equity  of  Bay  TV  and 
collectively  has  controlling  interests.    Payments  made  to  Bay TV  were  $2.9  million,  $2.2  million  and  $1.7  million  for  the  years 
ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We received $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 
Bay TV for certain equipment leases which expired on November 1, 2010.   

On December 1, 2012, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Bay TV for $40.0 million. Our board of directors obtained 
a fairness opinion on the purchase price from a third party valuation firm. Concurrent with the acquisition, our LMA with Bay TV 
was terminated.  

Charter Aircraft.  From time to  time, we charter aircraft owned by certain controlling shareholders.  We incurred expenses of 
$0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. For each of the years ended December 2011 and 2010, we incurred $0.2 
million related to these arrangements.  

Notes  and  capital  leases  payable  related  to  the  aforementioned  relationships  consisted  of  the  following  as  of  December  31, 

2012 and 2011 (in thousands): 

Capital lease for building, interest at 8.54% 
Capital leases for building and tower, interest at 7.93% 
Capital leases for broadcasting tower facilities, interest at 9.0% 
Capital leases for broadcasting tower facilities, interest at 10.5% 
Liability payable to affiliate for local marketing agreement, interest at 7.69% 

Less: Current portion   

2012 

7,405 
1,221 
1,275 
4,990 
— 
14,891 
(1,704) 
13,187 

$   

$   

2011 
8,402 
1,295 
1,641 
5,038 
3,183 
19,559 
(3,014) 
16,545 

$   

$  

Notes and capital leases payable related to the aforementioned relationships as of December 31, 2012 mature as follows (in 

thousands): 

2013 
2014 
2015 
2016 
2017 
2018 and thereafter 
Total minimum payments due 
Less: Amount representing interest 

$ 

$ 

3,306 
3,406 
3,371 
3,056 
2,965 
6,806 
22,910 
(8,019) 
14,891 

Cunningham  Broadcasting  Corporation.    As  of  December  31,  2012,  Cunningham  was  the  owner-operator  and  FCC  licensee  of: 
WNUV-TV  Baltimore,  Maryland;  WRGT-TV  Dayton,  Ohio;  WVAH-TV  Charleston,  West  Virginia;  WTAT-TV  Charleston, 
South  Carolina;  WMYA-TV  Anderson,  South  Carolina;  WTTE-TV  Columbus,  Ohio;  and  WDBB-TV  Birmingham,  Alabama 
(collectively, the Cunningham Stations).   

Trusts established for the benefit of the children of our controlling shareholders, and the estate of Carolyn C. Smith, a parent of 
our controlling shareholders, own Cunningham.  We have options from these trusts which grant us the right to acquire, subject to 
applicable FCC rules and regulations, 100% of the capital stock of Cunningham owned by the trusts.  We also have options from 
each of Cunningham’s subsidiaries, which are the FCC licensees of the Cunningham stations, which grant us the right to acquire, 
and  grant  Cunningham  the  right  to  require  us  to  acquire,  subject  to  applicable  FCC  rules and  regulations,  100%  of  the  capital 
stock or the assets of Cunningham’s individual subsidiaries.   

In  addition  to  the  option  agreements,  we  have  LMAs  with  the  Cunningham  stations  to  provide  programming,  sales  and 
managerial  services  to  the  stations.    Each  of  the  LMAs  has  a  current  term  that  expires  on  July  1,  2016  and  there  are  three 
additional 5-year renewal terms remaining with final expiration on July 1, 2031. 

Effective  November  5,  2009,  we  entered  into  amendments  and/or  restatements  of  the  following  agreements  between 
Cunningham  and  us:  (i)  the  LMAs,  (ii)  option  agreements  to  acquire  Cunningham  stock  and  (iii)  certain  acquisition  or  merger 
agreements relating to the Cunningham Stations.   

66  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the terms of the LMAs, options and other agreements, beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending on July 1, 2012, 
we were obligated to pay Cunningham the sum of approximately $29.1 million in 10 quarterly installments of $2.75 million and 
one quarterly payment of approximately $1.6 million, which amounts were used to pay down Cunningham’s bank credit facility 
and which amounts were credited toward the purchase price for each Cunningham station.  An additional $1.2 million was paid 
on July 1, 2012 and another installment of $2.75 million was paid on October 1, 2012 as an additional LMA fee and was used to 
pay off the remaining balance of Cunningham’s bank credit facility.  The aggregate purchase price of the television stations, which 
was originally $78.5 million pursuant to certain acquisition or merger agreements subject to 6% annual increases, was decreased by 
each  payment  made  by  us  to  Cunningham,  through  2012,  up  to  $29.1  million  in  the  aggregate,  pursuant  to  the  foregoing 
transactions  with  Cunningham  as  such  payments  are  made.    Beginning  on  January  1,  2013,  we  will  be  obligated  to  pay 
Cunningham an annual LMA fee for the television stations equal to the greater of (i) 3% of each station’s annual net broadcast 
revenue and (ii) $5.0 million, of which a portion of this fee will be credited toward the purchase price to the extent of the annual 
6% increase.  The remaining purchase price as of December 31, 2012 was approximately $57.1 million.     

Additionally, we reimburse Cunningham for 100% of its operating costs, and paid Cunningham a monthly payment of $50,000 

through December 2012 as an LMA fee.   

We made payments to Cunningham under these LMAs and other agreements of $15.7 million, $16.6 million and $17.3 million 
for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, 
Cunningham’s  stations  provided  us  with  approximately  $105.5  million,  $90.3  million  and  $94.3  million,  respectively,  of  total 
revenue.  The financial statements for Cunningham are included in our consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.  
Our Bank Credit Agreement contains certain cross-default provisions with certain material third-party licenses.  As of December 
31, 2012, Cunningham was the sole material third-party licensee. 

Atlantic Automotive.  We sold advertising time to and purchased vehicles and related vehicle services from Atlantic Automotive 
Corporation  (Atlantic  Automotive),  a  holding  company  that  owns  automobile  dealerships  and  an  automobile  leasing  company.  
David  D.  Smith,  our  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,  has  a  controlling  interest  in,  and  is  a  member  of  the  Board  of 
Directors  of  Atlantic  Automotive.    We  received  payments  for  advertising  totaling  $0.1  million,  $0.2  million  and  $0.3  million 
during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We paid $1.8 million, $1.1 million and $0.8 million for 
vehicles  and  related  vehicle  services  from  Atlantic  Automotive  during  the  years  ended  December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010, 
respectively.  Additionally, in August 2011, Atlantic Automotive entered into an office lease agreement with Towson City Center, 
LLC (Towson City Center), a subsidiary of one of our real estate ventures. Atlantic Automotive paid $0.4 million in rent during 
the year ended December 31, 2012.     

Leased property by real estate ventures. Certain  of  our  real  estate  ventures  have  entered  into  leases  with  entities  owned  by  David 
Smith to lease restaurant space. There are leases for three restaurants in a building owned by one of our consolidated real estate 
ventures in Baltimore, MD. Total rent received under these leases was $0.3 million,  $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the years 
ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. There is also one lease for a restaurant in a building owned by one of our real estate 
ventures, accounted for under the equity method, in Towson, MD. Annual rent under this lease will be approximately $0.2 million 
once the restaurant is opened in 2013.   

Thomas & Libowitz, P.A.  Basil A. Thomas, a member of our Board of Directors, is the father of Steven A. Thomas, a partner 
and founder of Thomas & Libowitz, P.A. (Thomas & Libowitz), a law firm providing legal services to us on an ongoing basis.  
We paid fees of $1.0 million, $0.5 million and $0.5 million to Thomas & Libowitz during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 

2012 Annual Report  67  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: 

The following table reconciles income (numerator) and shares (denominator) used in our computations of earnings per share 

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands): 

Income (Numerator) 
Income from continuing operations 
Income impact of assumed conversion of the 4.875% 

Notes, net of taxes 

Income impact of assumed conversion of the 6.0% 

Notes, net of taxes 

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling 
interests included in continuing operations 

Numerator for diluted earnings per common share 
from continuing operations available to common 
shareholders 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of 

taxes 

Numerator for diluted earnings available to common 

2012 

2011 

2010 

$  144,488 

$ 

76,588 

$ 

75,625 

180 

— 

(287) 

144,381 

465 

180 

— 

(379) 

76,389 

(411) 

166 

2,521 

1,100 

79,412 

(577) 

shareholders 

  $ 

144,846 

  $ 

75,978 

  $ 

78,835 

Shares (Denominator) 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding 
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock settled 

appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and  
stock options 

Dilutive effect of 4.875% Notes 
Dilutive effect of 6.0% Notes 
Weighted-average common and common equivalent 

shares outstanding 

81,020 

36 
254 
— 

81,310 

80,217 

61 
254 
— 

80,532 

80,245 

37 
254 
3,070 

83,606 

Potentially dilutive securities representing 1.5 million, 1.1 million and 1.4 million shares of common stock for the years ended 
December  31,  2012,  2011  and  2010,  respectively,  were  excluded  from  the  computation  of  diluted  earnings  (loss)  per  common 
share for these periods because their effect would have been antidilutive. The increase in 2012 compared to 2011 of potentially 
dilutive  securities  is  primarily  related  to  the  issuance  of  new  stock  settled  appreciation  rights  in  2012.    The  decrease  in  2011 
compared to 2010 of  potentially dilutive  securities is primarily related to the exercise of  some of  our stock-settled appreciation 
rights in 2011. The net earnings per share amounts are the same for Class A and Class B Common Stock because the holders of 
each class are legally entitled to equal per share distributions whether through dividends or in liquidation. 

13.  SEGMENT DATA: 

We measure segment performance based on operating income (loss). Our broadcast segment includes stations in 45 markets, 
located predominately in the eastern, mid-western and southern United States. In 2012, we determined that the operating results 
of WLAJ-TV and WLWC-TV, which were acquired in early 2012, should be accounted for as discontinued operations and are not 
included  in  our  consolidated  results  of  continuing  operations  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012.  Our  other  operating 
divisions  segment  primarily  earned  revenues  from  sign  design  and  fabrication;  regional  security  alarm  operating  and  bulk 
acquisitions  and  real  estate  ventures.  All  of  our  other  operating  divisions  are  located  within  the  United  States.  Corporate  costs 
primarily include our costs to operate as a public company and to operate our corporate headquarters location. Corporate is not a 
reportable  segment.    We  had  approximately  $171.2  million  and  $170.0  million  of  intercompany  loans  between  the  broadcast 
segment, operating divisions segment and corporate as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  We had $20.0 million, $19.7 
million and $19.3 million in intercompany interest expense related to intercompany loans between the broadcast segment, other 
operating divisions segment and corporate for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Intercompany 
loans and interest expense are excluded from the tables below.  All other intercompany transactions are immaterial. 

68  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Financial information for our operating segments is included in the following tables for the years ended December 31, 2012, 

2011 and 2010 (in thousands): 

For the year ended December 31, 2012 
Revenue 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 

Broadcast 
$   1,007,498 
44,054 

and other assets 

Amortization of program contract costs and 

net realizable value adjustments 

General and administrative overhead expenses 
Operating income (loss) 
Interest expense 
Income from equity and cost method 

investments 

Goodwill 
Assets 
Capital expenditures 

33,701 

60,990 
28,854 
333,164 
— 

— 
1,070,544 
2,436,537 
35,161 

For the year ended December 31, 2011 
Revenue 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 

$   

Broadcast 
720,775 
29,929 

and other assets 

Amortization of program contract costs and 

net realizable value adjustments 

Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other 

assets 

General and administrative overhead expenses 
Operating income (loss) 
Interest expense 
Income from equity and cost method 

investments 

Goodwill 
Assets 
Capital expenditures 

14,643 

52,079 

398 
24,760 
230,679 
— 

— 
656,629 
1,303,604 
34,453 

For the year ended December 31, 2010 
Revenue 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 

$   

Broadcast 
731,046 
33,260 

and other assets  

Amortization of program contract costs and 

net realizable value adjustments 

Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other 

assets 

General and administrative overhead expenses 
Operating income (loss) 
Interest expense 
Loss from equity and cost method investments 

15,974 

60,862 

4,803 
23,685 
244,297 
— 
— 

Other 
Operating 
Divisions 
54,181 
1,496 

$  

4,398 

— 
1,697 
491 
3,282 

9,670 
3,488 
284,583 
2,341 

Other 
Operating 
Divisions 
44,513 
1,323 

$  

3,586 

— 

— 
1,158 
(1,041) 
2,528 

3,269 
3,488 
256,408 
1,382 

Other 
Operating 
Divisions 
36,598 
1,291 

$  

2,860 

— 

— 
918 
478 
1,943 
(4,861) 

$  

Corporate  
— 
1,523 

$  

Consolidated 
1,061,679 
47,073 

— 

— 
2,840 
(4,377) 
125,271 

— 
— 
8,577 
6,484 

38,099 

60,990 
33,391 
329,278 
128,553 

9,670 
1,074,032 
2,729,697 
43,986 

$   

Corporate  
— 
1,622 

$   

Consolidated 
765,288 
32,874 

— 

— 

— 
2,392 
(4,018) 
103,600 

— 
— 
11,405 
— 

18,229 

52,079 

398 
28,310 
225,620 
106,128 

3,269 
660,117 
1,571,417 
35,835 

$   

Corporate  
— 
1,756 

$   

Consolidated 
767,644 
36,307 

— 

— 

— 
2,197 
(3,960) 
114,103 
— 

18,834 

60,862 

4,803 
26,800 
240,815 
116,046 
(4,861) 

2012 Annual Report  69  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS: 

Accounting guidance provides for valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income 
approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or 
replacement cost).  A fair value hierarchy using three broad levels prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure 
fair value.  The following is a brief description of those three levels:  

  Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 
  Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  These 
include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or 
liabilities in markets that are not active. 

  Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions. 

The  carrying  value  and  fair  value  of  our  notes,  debentures,  program  contracts  payable  and  non-cancelable  programming 

commitments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands):  

2012 

2011 

Carrying Value 

Fair Value 

  Carrying Value 

Fair Value 

Level 2: 

$ 

9.25% Senior Second Lien Notes due 2017 
8.375% Senior Notes due 2018 
6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022 
Term Loan A 
Term Loan B 
Cunningham Bank Credit Facility 
Deerfield Bank Credit Facility 

Level 3 

Active program contracts payable 
Future program liabilities (a) 

490,517 
234,853 
500,000 
263,875 
580,850 
— 
19,950 

104,356 
140,535 

$    552,500 
265,886 
533,125 
262,556 
589,125 
— 
19,950 

102,768 
120,922 

$ 

    489,052 

$ 

234,512 
— 
115,000 
217,002 
10,967 
— 

91,450 
125,075 

  549,690 
246,884 
— 
112,700 
221,700 
11,100 
— 

88,699 
105,166 

(a)  Future program liabilities reflect a license agreement for program material that is not yet available for its first showing or telecast and 

is, therefore, not recorded as an asset or liability on our balance sheet.  The carrying value reflects the undiscounted future payments. 

Our estimates of the fair value of active program contracts payable and future program liabilities in the table above, were based 
on discounted cash flows using Level 3 inputs described above.  The discount rate represents an estimate of a market participants’ 
return and risk applicable to program contracts.  The discount rate used to determine the fair value of active and future program 
liabilities was 8.0% as of December 31, 2012.  Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate would result in a significantly 
lower (higher) fair value measurement. 

Not included in the table above are the fair values and carrying values for our 4.875% Notes and 3.0% Notes, which we believe 

their fair values approximate their carrying values based on discounted cash flows using Level 3 inputs described above. 

Additionally,  Cunningham,  one  of  our  consolidated  VIEs  has  investments  which  are  accounted  for  as  trading  securities  and 
recorded at fair value using Level 1 inputs described above. As of  December 31, 2012 and 2011, $6.4 million and $4.9 million 
were included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. 

70  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: 

Sinclair Television Group, Inc. (STG), a wholly-owned subsidiary and the television operating subsidiary of Sinclair Broadcast 
Group, Inc. (SBG), is the primary  obligor under the Bank Credit Agreement, 6.125% Notes, the 8.375% Notes and the 9.25% 
Notes. Our Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock, the 4.875% Notes and the 3.0% Notes, as of December 31, 2012, 
were obligations or securities of SBG and not obligations or securities of STG.  SBG was the obligor of the 6.0% Notes until they 
were fully redeemed in 2011.  SBG  is a guarantor under the Bank Credit Agreement, the 6.125% Notes, 9.25% Notes and the 
8.375% Notes.  As of December 31, 2012 our consolidated total debt of $2,273.4 million included $2,184.6 million of debt related 
to STG and its subsidiaries of which SBG guaranteed $2,138.0 million. 

SBG,  KDSM,  LLC,  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  SBG,  and  STG’s  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  (guarantor  subsidiaries),  have 
fully and unconditionally guaranteed, subject to certain customary automatic release provisions, all of STG’s obligations.  Those 
guarantees are joint and several.  There are certain contractual restrictions on the ability of SBG, STG or KDSM, LLC to obtain 
funds from their subsidiaries in the form of dividends or loans.   

The following condensed consolidating financial statements present the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of 
operations and consolidated statements of cash flows of SBG, STG, KDSM, LLC and the guarantor subsidiaries, the direct and 
indirect non-guarantor subsidiaries of SBG and the eliminations necessary to arrive at our information on a consolidated basis.  
These statements are presented in accordance with the disclosure requirements under SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10.   

Certain  revisions  have  been  made  to  correct  immaterial  errors  in  the  condensed  consolidating  balance  sheet,  the  condensed 
consolidating statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year  ended December 31, 2011.  The revisions to the 
condensed  consolidating  balance  sheet  increased  certain  noncurrent  assets  by  $17.3  million  and  noncontrolling  interests  in 
consolidated subsidiaries by $9.8 million and decreased additional paid-in capital by $1.6 million and accumulated deficit by $9.1    
million  of  the  Non-guarantor  Subsidiaries,  with  corresponding  offsetting  adjustments  to  the  same  items  in  the  Eliminations 
column.  The revisions to the condensed consolidating statements of operations and comprehensive income, for the year ended 
December 31, 2011 and 2010, increased depreciation, amortization and other operating expenses by $0.7 million and $0.6 million, 
respectively, and increased net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests for the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries by $0.4 million, for 
the year ended 2011 and increased net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries by  $1.1 
million for the year ended 2010, with corresponding offsetting adjustments to the same items in the Eliminations column.  These 
revisions  had  no  effect  on  amounts  presented  for  SBG,  STG,  the  Guarantor  Subsidiaries  and  KDSM,  LLC  or  Sinclair 
Consolidated.   

2012 Annual Report  71  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET 
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 
(In thousands) 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

Cash 
Accounts and other receivables 
Other current assets 
Assets held for sale 
Total current assets 

Property and equipment, net 

Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 
Restricted cash – long term 
Other long-term assets 
Total other long-term assets 

Goodwill and other intangible assets 

$  

— 
152 
2,821 
— 
2,973 

6,315 

— 
— 
84,055 
84,055 

— 

$  

7,230 
907 
2,342 
— 
10,479 

$  

199 
175,837 
56,522 
30,357 
262,915 

$  

15,436 
7,622 
9,028 
— 
32,086 

$  

— 
(622) 
(3,383) 
— 
(4,005) 

$   22,865 
183,896 
67,330 
30,357 
304,448 

8,938 

321,873 

113,454 

(10,867) 

439,713 

1,636,504 
2 
375,687 
2,012,193 

1,956 
223 
60,114 
62,293 

— 
— 
112,757 
112,757 

(1,638,460) 
— 
(429,862) 
(2,068,322) 

— 
225 
202,751 
202,976 

— 

1,706,646 

153,961 

(78,047) 

1,782,560 

Total assets 

$    93,343 

$   2,031,610 

$  2,353,727 

$   412,258 

$ (2,161,241) 

$  2,729,697 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Current portion of long-term debt 
Current portion of affiliate long-term debt 
Other current liabilities  
Liabilities held for sale  
Total current liabilities 

$  

Long-term debt 
Affiliate long-term debt 
Dividends in excess of investment in 

consolidated subsidiaries 

Other liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Common stock 
Additional paid-in capital 
Accumulated (deficit) earnings 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) 

gain 

Total Sinclair Broadcast Group 
shareholders’ (deficit) equity 

Noncontrolling interests in consolidated 

subsidiaries 

Total liabilities and equity (deficit) 

$  

326 
483 
1,102 
— 
— 
1,911 

12,502 
6,303 

178,869 
10,708 
210,293 

$  

61,165 
31,113 
— 
— 
— 
92,278 

2,088,586 
— 

— 
2,509 
2,183,373 

$  

83,049 
800 
602 
96,288 
2,397 
183,136 

36,705 
6,884 

— 
491,845 
718,570 

$  

9,379 
15,226 
433 
8,871 
— 
33,909 

73,073 
267,521 

— 
103,007 
477,510 

812 
600,928 
(713,697) 

— 
(175,973) 
27,597 

10 
1,084,302 
553,777 

— 
64,096 
(147,299) 

$  

(102) 
— 
(433) 
(3,099) 
— 
(3,634) 

$   153,817 
47,622 
1,704 
102,060 
2,397 
307,600 

— 
(267,521) 

2,210,866 
13,187 

(178,869) 
(309,972) 
(759,996) 

(10) 
(972,425) 
(434,075) 

— 
298,097 
2,829,750 

812 
600,928 
(713,697) 

(4,993) 

(3,387) 

(2,932) 

1,054 

5,265 

(4,993) 

(116,950) 

(151,763) 

1,635,157 

(82,149) 

(1,401,245) 

(116,950) 

— 
93,343 

— 
$  2,031,610 

— 
$  2,353,727 

16,897 
$    412,258 

— 

$ (2,161,241) 

16,897 
$ 2,729,697 

72  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET 
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 
(In thousands) 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

Cash 
Accounts and other receivables 
Other current assets 
Total current assets 

Property and equipment, net 

Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 
Restricted cash – long term 
Other long-term assets 
Total other long-term assets 

Goodwill and other intangible assets 

$  

— 
60 
2,430 
2,490 

8,234 

— 
— 
86,186 
86,186 

— 

$  

188 
348 
2,561 
3,097 

7,783 

575,848 
58,503 
353,929 
988,280 

$  

313 
126,590 
55,855 
182,758 

$  

12,466 
6,276 
3,021 
21,763 

$  

— 
(107) 
(284) 
(391) 

$  

12,967 
133,167 
63,583 
209,717 

171,749 

104,825 

(11,070) 

281,521 

— 
223 
17,209 
17,432 

— 
— 
99,630 
99,630 

83,387 

(575,848) 
— 
(417,961) 
(993,809) 

— 
58,726 
138,993 
197,719 

(27,102) 

882,460 

— 

826,175 

Total assets 

$    96,910 

$    999,160 

$  1,198,114 

$    309,605 

$ (1,032,372) 

$  1,571,417 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Current portion of long-term debt 
Current portion of affiliate long-term debt 
Other current liabilities 
Total current liabilities 

$  

1,499 
420 
998 
— 
2,917 

$  

30,888 
14,450 
— 
— 
45,338 

$  

12,811 
7,405 

143,857 
51,095 
218,085 

1,055,446 
— 

— 
2,222 
1,103,006 

809 
617,375 
(734,511) 

— 
7,755 
(108,558) 

Long-term debt 
Affiliate long-term debt 
Dividends in excess of investment in 

consolidated subsidiaries 

Other liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Common stock 
Additional paid-in capital 
Accumulated (deficit) earnings 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) 

income 

Total Sinclair Broadcast Group 
shareholders’ (deficit) equity 

Noncontrolling interests in consolidated 

subsidiaries 

Total liabilities and equity (deficit) 

$  

51,119 
589 
2,016 
65,431 
119,155 

37,502 
9,140 

— 
457,003 
622,800 

10 
264,413 
313,269 

$  

7,555 
22,736 
210 
372 
30,873 

42,512 
246,552 

— 
58,222 
378,159 

— 
52,710 
(131,527) 

$  

(2,491) 
— 
(210) 
— 
(2,701) 

$  

88,570 
38,195 
3,014 
65,803 
195,582 

— 
(246,552) 

(143,857) 
(246,161) 
(639,271) 

(10) 
(324,878) 
(73,184) 

1,148,271 
16,545 

— 
322,381 
1,682,779 

809 
617,375 
(734,511) 

(4,848) 

(3,043) 

(2,378) 

450 

4,971 

(4,848) 

(121,175) 

(103,846) 

575,314 

(78,367) 

(393,101) 

(121,175) 

— 
96,910 

— 
$   999,160 

— 
$  1,198,114 

9,813 
$    309,605 

— 

$ (1,032,372) 

9,813 
$ 1,571,417 

2012 Annual Report  73  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE 
INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 
(In thousands)  

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

Net revenue 

$  

— 

$   

— 

$  

1,008,146 

$  

64,909 

$ 

(11,376) 

$   1,061,679 

Program and production 
Selling, general and administrative 
Depreciation, amortization and other 

operating expenses 
Total operating expenses 

— 
2,853 

1,523 
4,376 

322 
28,762 

1,890 
30,974 

263,802 
168,540 

213,688 
646,030 

Operating (loss) income 

(4,376) 

(30,974) 

362,116 

1,400 
6,082 

55,802 
63,284 

1,625 

(9,968) 
(1,567) 

(728) 
(12,263) 

255,556 
204,670 

272,175 
732,401 

887 

329,278 

Equity in losses of consolidated 

subsidiaries 
Interest expense 
Other income (expense)  
Total other (expense) income  

Income tax benefit   
Loss from discontinued operations, 

net of taxes 
Net (loss) income 
Net loss attributable to the 
noncontrolling interests 

Net (loss) income attributable to 
Sinclair Broadcast Group  

Comprehensive Income  

144,620 
(1,317) 
5,245 
148,548 

194,686 
(118,491) 
38,677 
114,872 

(123) 
(4,840) 
 (39,774) 
(44,737) 

— 
(24,780) 
8,690 
(16,090) 

(339,183) 
20,875 
(1,223) 
(319,531) 

— 
(128,553) 
11,615 
(116,938) 

494 

41,709 

(118,519) 

8,464 

— 

(67,852) 

— 
144,666 

(269) 
125,338 

734 
199,594 

— 

— 

— 

— 
(6,001) 

(287) 

— 
(318,644) 

465 
144,953 

— 

(287) 

$   144,666 
$   144,808 

$  
$  

125,338 
125,193 

$  
$  

199,594 
199,594 

$  
$  

(6,288) 
(6,288) 

$ 
$ 

(318,644) 
(318,499) 

$  
$  

144,666 
144,808 

74  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of consolidated 

subsidiaries 
Interest expense 
Gain on Sales of Securities  
Other income (expense)  
Total other income (expense) 

Income tax (provision) benefit   
Loss from discontinued operations, 

net of taxes 
Net income (loss) 
Net loss attributable to the 
noncontrolling interests 

Net income (loss) attributable to 
Sinclair Broadcast Group  

Comprehensive Income  

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE 
INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 
(In thousands) 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

Net revenue 

$  

— 

$   

— 

$  

721,936 

$  

52,295 

$ 

(8,943) 

$  

765,288 

Program and production 
Selling, general and administrative 
Depreciation, amortization and other 

operating expenses 
Total operating expenses 

— 
2,396 

1,622 
4,018 

1,298 
25,160 

688 
27,146 

185,038 
121,391 

160,432 
466,861 

Operating (loss) income 

(4,018) 

(27,146) 

255,075 

338 
3,765 

46,618 
50,721 

1,574 

— 
(23,978) 
391 
1,560 
(22,027) 

(8,062) 
(464) 

(552) 
(9,078) 

178,612 
152,248 

208,808 
539,668 

135 

225,620 

(218,350) 
20,622 
(391) 
(573) 
(198,692) 

— 
(106,128) 
— 
1,881 
(104,247) 

83,354 
(3,285) 
— 
1,781 
81,850 

134,996 
(94,556) 
— 
35,255 
75,695 

— 
(4,931) 
— 
(36,142) 
(41,073) 

(2,034) 

29,783 

(75,449) 

2,915 

— 

(44,785) 

— 
75,798 

— 

(411) 
77,921 

— 

— 
138,553 

— 
(17,538) 

— 
(198,557) 

(411) 
76,177 

— 

(379) 

— 

(379) 

$  
$  

75,798 
75,243 

$  
$  

77,921 
76,987 

$  
$  

138,553 
138,553 

$  
$  

(17,917) 
(17,917) 

$ 
$ 

(198,557) 
(197,623) 

$  
$  

75,798 
75,243 

2012 Annual Report  75  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE 
INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 
(In thousands) 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

Net revenue 

$  

— 

$   

— 

$  

732,214 

$  

45,351 

$ 

(9,921) 

$  

767,644 

Program and production 
Selling, general and administrative 
Depreciation, amortization and other 

operating expenses 
Total operating expenses 

— 
2,205 

1,756 
3,961 

893 
23,530 

518 
24,941 

161,746 
125,106 

179,345 
466,197 

Operating (loss) income 

(3,961) 

(24,941) 

266,017 

369 
3,597 

37,600 
41,566 

3,785 

— 
(22,334) 
(7,026) 
(29,360) 

(8,875) 
(547) 

(414) 
(9,836) 

154,133 
153,891 

218,805 
526,829 

(85) 

240,815 

(222,789) 
20,192 
(441) 
(203,038) 

— 
(116,046) 
(8,918) 
(124,964) 

136,815 
(95,089) 
33,389 
75,115 

— 
(5,204) 
(36,506) 
(41,710) 

85,974 
(13,611) 
1,666 
74,029 

6,080 

— 
76,148 

— 

31,654 

(84,073) 

6,113 

— 

(40,226) 

(577) 
81,251 

— 

— 
140,234 

— 
(19,462) 

— 
(203,123) 

(577) 
75,048 

— 

1,100 

— 

1,100 

$  
$  

76,148 
75,347 

$  
$  

81,251 
81,550 

$  
$  

140,234 
140,234 

$  
$  

(18,362) 
(18,362) 

$ 
$ 

(203,123) 
(203,422) 

$  
$  

76,148 
75,347 

Equity in earnings of consolidated 

subsidiaries 
Interest expense 
Other income (expense)  
Total other income (expense) 

Income tax benefit (provision)   
Loss from discontinued operations, 

net of taxes 
Net income (loss) 
Net loss attributable to the 
noncontrolling interests 

Net income (loss) attributable to 
Sinclair Broadcast Group  

Comprehensive Income  

76  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 
(In thousands)  

NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN) FROM 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
Acquisition of property and equipment 
Payments for acquisitions of television 

stations 

Purchase of alarm monitoring contracts 
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash 
Distributions from investments 
Investments in equity and cost method 

investees 

Investment in debt securities 
Proceeds from sale of assets 
Proceeds from insurance settlement 
Loans to affiliates 
Proceeds from loans to affiliates 

Net cash flows (used in) from 

investing activities 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
Proceeds from notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Repayments of notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Proceeds from share based awards 
Dividends paid on Class A and Class B 

Common Stock 

Payments for deferred financing costs 
Distribution from noncontrolling 

interests 

Repayments of notes and capital leases 

to affiliates 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany 

payables 

Net cash flows from (used in) 

financing activities 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

$  

(4,038) 

$  

(56,760) 

  $ 282,446 

$  

12,999 

$  

2,828 

$   237,475 

396 

— 
— 
— 
836 

(2,000) 
— 
— 
— 
(277) 
183 

(4,057) 

(37,635) 

(2,690) 

— 

(43,986) 

(1,127,848) 
— 
58,501 
— 

— 
— 
10,700 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

— 

— 
— 
10 
42 
— 
— 

(18,200) 
(12,454) 
— 
8,754 

(22,052) 
(1,493) 
— 
— 
— 
— 

10,700 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
(10,700) 
— 
— 
— 

(1,135,348) 
(12,454) 
58,501 
9,590 

(24,052) 
(1,493) 
10 
42 
(277) 
183 

(862) 

(1,062,704) 

(37,583) 

(48,135) 

— 

(1,149,284) 

— 

1,201,275 

— 

45,980 

(419) 
391 

(154,989) 
— 

(586) 
— 

(23,362) 
— 

(125,100) 
— 

— 
(17,660) 

— 

(998) 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 
(1,047) 

(1,142) 

(1,884) 

— 

— 

— 
— 

1,248 
— 

— 

— 

1,247,255 

(179,356) 
391 

(123,852) 
(18,707) 

(1,142) 

(2,882) 

131,026 

97,880 

(242,507) 

17,677 

(4,076) 

— 

4,900 

1,126,506 

(244,977) 

38,106 

(2,828) 

921,707 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

beginning of period 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

end of period 

$  

— 

— 

— 

7,042 

188 

(114) 

313 

2,970 

12,466 

$  

7,230 

$  

199 

$  

15,436 

$  

— 

— 

— 

9,898 

12,967 

$  

22,865 

2012 Annual Report  77  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 
(In thousands) 

NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN) FROM 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) FROM 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
Acquisition of property and equipment 
Purchase of alarm monitoring contracts 
Increase in restricted cash 
Distributions from investments 
Investments in equity and cost method 

investees 

Investment in debt securities 
Payments for acquisitions of assets of 

other operating divisions 
Proceeds from sale of assets 
Proceeds from sale of securities 
Proceeds from insurance settlement 
Loans to affiliates 
Proceeds from loans to affiliates 

Net cash flows used in investing 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

$  

(10,424) 

$  

(65,150) 

$   225,516 

$  

704 

$  

(2,133) 

$   148,513 

— 
— 
— 
— 

(4,000) 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
(194) 
199 

(3,503) 
— 
(53,445) 
— 

— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
(212) 
— 

(30,950) 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

— 
59 
— 
1,739 
— 
— 

(1,382) 
(8,850) 
— 
3,798 

(7,577) 
(4,911) 

(3,072) 
10 
1,808 
— 
— 
43 

— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 

— 
— 
(1,808) 
— 
— 
— 

(35,835) 
(8,850) 
(53,445) 
3,798 

(11,577) 
(4,911) 

(3,072) 
69 
— 
1,739 
(406) 
242 

activities 

(3,995) 

(57,160) 

(29,152) 

(20,133) 

(1,808) 

(112,248) 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
Proceeds from notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Repayments of notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Proceeds from share based awards 
Purchase of subsidiary shares from 

noncontrolling interests 

Dividends paid on Class A and Class B 

Common Stock 

Payments for deferred financing costs 
Proceeds from Class A Common Stock 

sold by variable interest entity 
Distributions from noncontrolling 

interests 

Repayments of notes and capital leases 

to affiliates 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany 

— 

136,719 

— 

15,014 

(57,120) 
1,794 

(70,234) 
— 

(432) 
— 

— 

— 

(38,820) 
— 

— 
(5,417) 

— 

— 

(869) 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

— 

(2,341) 

(22,661) 
— 

(2,501) 

— 
(66) 

— 

(610) 

— 

payables 

109,434 

56,359 

(194,300) 

26,838 

Net cash flows from (used in) 

financing activities 

14,419 

117,427 

(197,073) 

16,014 

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND 

CASH EQUIVALENTS 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

beginning of period 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

end of period 

$  

— 

— 

— 

(4,883) 

5,071 

(709) 

(3,415) 

1,022 

15,881 

$  

188 

$  

313 

$   12,466 

$  

— 

— 
— 

— 

464 
— 

1,808 

— 

— 

1,669 

3,941 

— 

— 

— 

151,733 

(150,447) 
1,794 

(2,501) 

(38,356) 
(5,483) 

1,808 

(610) 

(3,210) 

— 

(45,272) 

(9,007) 

21,974 

$  

12,967 

78  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 
(In thousands) 

Sinclair 
Broadcast 
Group, Inc. 

Sinclair 
Television 
Group, Inc. 

Guarantor 
Subsidiaries 
and  KDSM, 
LLC 

Non-
Guarantor 
Subsidiaries  Eliminations 

Sinclair 
Consolidated 

$  

(25,213) 

$  

(76,450) 

$   265,706 

$  

(5,731) 

$  

(3,351) 

$   154,961 

— 
— 
— 
709 

(2,000) 
— 
(136) 
117 
— 

(3,686) 
— 
59,342 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

(6,173) 
— 
260 
— 

— 
110 
— 
— 
372 

(1,835) 
(10,106) 
— 
185 

(5,224) 
— 
— 
— 
— 

investing activities 

(1,310) 

55,656 

(5,431) 

(16,980) 

— 

264,068 

— 

19,862 

— 

283,930 

(103,878) 

(302,350) 

(317) 

(20,876) 

(34,557) 
— 

— 
(7,016) 

— 

(753) 

— 

— 

— 
— 

— 

(2,370) 

— 
(4) 

(287) 

— 

165,711 

60,799 

(256,783) 

27,254 

26,523 

15,501 

(259,470) 

25,949 

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

beginning of period 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, 

end of period 

$  

— 

— 

— 

(5,293) 

10,364 

805 

217 

3,238 

12,643 

$  

5,071 

$  

1,022 

$   15,881 

$  

NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN) FROM 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) FROM 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
Acquisition of property and equipment 
Purchase of alarm monitoring contracts 
Decrease in restricted cash 
Distributions from investments 
Investments in equity and cost method 

investees 

Proceeds from sale of assets 
Loans to affiliates 
Proceeds from loans to affiliates 
Proceeds from insurance settlement 
Net cash flows (used in) from 

CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
Proceeds from notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Repayments of notes payable, 

commercial bank financing and 
capital leases 

Dividends paid on Class A and Class B 

Common Stock 

Payments for deferred financing costs 
Distributions from noncontrolling 

interests 

Repayments of notes and capital leases 

to affiliates 

Increase (decrease) in intercompany 

payables 

Net cash flows from (used in) 

financing activities 

— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

(11,694) 
(10,106) 
59,602 
894 

(7,224) 
110 
(136) 
117 
372 

31,935 

— 

332 
— 

— 

— 

3,019 

3,351 

— 

— 

— 

(427,421) 

(34,225) 
(7,020) 

(287) 

(3,123) 

— 

(188,146) 

(1,250) 

23,224 

$  

21,974 

2012 Annual Report  79  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.  QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED): 
(in thousands, except per share data) 

For the Quarter Ended 

03/31/12  

06/30/12 

09/30/12 

12/31/12 

Total revenues, net 
Operating income  
Income from continuing operations 
(Loss) income from discontinued operations 
Net income attributable to Sinclair Broadcast 

Group 

Basic earnings per common share from 

continuing operations attributable to Sinclair 
Broadcast Group 

Basic earnings per common share attributable to 

Sinclair Broadcast Group 

Diluted earnings per common share from 

continuing operations attributable to Sinclair 
Broadcast Group 

Diluted earnings per common share attributable 

to Sinclair Broadcast Group  

For the Quarter Ended 

Total revenues, net 
Operating income  
Loss on extinguishment of debt 
Income from continuing operations 
Loss from discontinued operations 
Net income attributable to Sinclair Broadcast 

Group 

Basic earnings per common share from 

continuing operations attributable to Sinclair 
Broadcast Group 

Basic earnings per common share attributable to 

Sinclair Broadcast Group 

Diluted earnings per common share from 

continuing operations attributable to Sinclair 
Broadcast Group 

Diluted earnings per common share attributable 

to Sinclair Broadcast Group  

$  
$  
$  
$  

$  

$  

$  

$  

$  

$  
$  
$  
$  
$  

$  

$  

$  

$  

$  

222,375 
59,895 
29,126 
(51) 

29,360 

0.36 

0.36 

0.36 

0.36 

$  
$  
$  
$  

$ 

$  

$  

$  

$  

251,074 
71,887 
30,131 
(1) 

$   
$   
$   
$   

258,713 
78,399 
26,479 
(126) 

30,058 

$ 

26,246 

0.37 

0.37 

0.37 

0.37 

$   

$   

$   

$   

0.33 

0.33 

0.33 

0.32 

$   
$   
$   
$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

329,517 
119,097 
58,752 
643 

59,002 

0.72 

0.73 

0.72 

0.73 

03/31/11  

06/30/11 

09/30/11 

12/31/11 

182,609 
51,472 
(924) 
15,235 
(108) 

15,279 

0.19 

0.19 

0.19 

0.19 

$  
$  
$  
$  
$  

$ 

$  

$  

$  

$  

188,861 
58,238 
(3,478) 
18,559 
(82) 

18,579 

0.24 

0.23 

0.24 

0.23 

$   
$   
$   
$   
$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

181,042 
52,410 
(117) 
19,441 
(110) 

19,238 

0.24 

0.24 

0.24 

0.24 

$   
$   
$   
$   
$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

$   

212,776 
63,500 
(328) 
23,353 
(111) 

22,702 

0.28 

0.28 

0.28 

0.28 

80  Sinclair Broadcast Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM: 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of  operations, of  equity 
(deficit),  of  comprehensive  income,  and  of  cash  flows  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  position  of  Sinclair 
Broadcast Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the results of their 
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting 
principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.    Also  in  our  opinion,  the  Company  maintained,  in  all  material 
respects,  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2012,  based  on  criteria  established  in  Internal 
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial 
reporting  and  for  its  assessment  of  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  included  in  the  Report  of 
Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on 
these  financial  statements  and  on  the  Company's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  based  on  our  integrated  audits.    We 
conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  
Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial 
statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all 
material respects.  Our audits of  the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts 
and  disclosures  in  the  financial  statements,  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by 
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting 
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, 
and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also 
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a 
reasonable basis for our opinions. 

A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the 
reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally 
accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of 
the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of 
financial  statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  that  receipts  and  expenditures  of  the 
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide 
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s 
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect  misstatements.    Also, 
projections  of  any  evaluation  of  effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become  inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

As described in the Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, management 
has excluded the operations of WKRC-TV, WOAI-TV, WHP-TV, WPMI-TV, WJTC-TV, KSAS-TV, WHAM-TV, WLYH-TV, 
KMTW-TV, KBTV-TV, WRSP-TV, WCCU-TV and WBUI-TV from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting 
as of  December 31, 2012  because these television stations  were acquired by the Company  in a purchase  business combination 
during the fourth quarter of 2012.  We have also excluded WKRC-TV, WOAI-TV, WHP-TV, WPMI-TV, WJTC-TV, KSAS-TV, 
WHAM-TV,  WLYH-TV,  KMTW-TV,  KBTV-TV,  WRSP-TV,  WCCU-TV  and  WBUI-TV  from  our  audit  of  internal  control 
over financial reporting. These assets acquired represent $514.8 million of total assets as of December 31, 2012 and $12.3 million 
of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Baltimore, Maryland 
March 12, 2013 

2012 Annual Report  81  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                      
 
 
 
TELEVISION STATION MANAGEMENT 

Each of our stations or markets has a general manager and a group manager.  The group managers are responsible for managing a number of 
stations and in some cases are also the general managers for a station or market.  Below is a list of our group managers and general managers as 
well as the station or market for which they serve as the general manager.   

GROUP MANAGERS 

William J. Fanshawe – Baltimore, Maryland 
Alan B. Frank – Rochester, New York and Peoria/Bloomington, Illinois 
Daniel P. Mellon – Columbus, Ohio 
Jonathan P. Lawhead – Cincinnati, Ohio 
John Seabers – San Antonio, Texas 

GENERAL MANAGERS 

Lisa Barhorst – Dayton, Ohio 
Robert Butterfield – West Palm Beach/Fort Pierce, Florida 
Tina Castano – Providence, Rhode Island-New Bedford, Massachusetts 
Terry Cole – Pensacola, Florida 
Chad Conklin – Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, Michigan 
John Connors – Asheville, North Carolina-Greenville/Spartanburg/Anderson, South Carolina 
Harold Cooper – Charleston/ Huntington, West Virginia 
Ronna Corrente – Lexington, Kentucky 
Mike Costa – Chattanooga, Tennessee 
Kent Crawford – Salt Lake City/St. George, Utah 
John Dittmeier – Tallahassee, Florida 
Rix Garey – Beaumont, Texas 
Terry Gaughan – Milwaukee, Wisconsin 
Steven Genett – Richmond, Virginia 
Arthur Hasson – Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
John Hayes – Greensboro/Highpoint/Winston-Salem, North Carolina 
John Hummel – Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina 
Tom Humpage – Portland, Maine 
Kerry Johnson – Cedar Rapids, Iowa and Madison, Wisconsin 
Mary Margaret Nelms – Charleston, South Carolina 
Kingsley Kelley – Medford, Oregon 
Jim Lapiana – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
Jay C. Lowe – Birmingham, Alabama 
Jim Lutton – Grand Rapids, Michigan 
Nick Magnini – Buffalo, New York 
Dominic Mancuso – Nashville, Tennessee 
Tim Mathis – Springfield/Champaign, Illinois 
Jeff McCallister – Norfolk, Virginia 
Jeff McCausland – Wichita, Kansas 
Vince Nelson – Albany, New York 
Don O’Connor – Syracuse, New York 
Noreen Parker – Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida 
Paula Peden – Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 
Michael Pumo – West Palm Beach, Florida 
Dean Radla – San Antonio, Texas 
John Rossi – Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
Mike Smythe – Cape Girardeau, Missouri-Paducah, Kentucky 
Audra Swain – Las Vegas, Nevada 
Thomas Tipton – St. Louis, Missouri 
Bobby Totsch – Mobile, Alabama 
Amy Villarreal – Austin, Texas 
Mike Wilson – Des Moines, Iowa 

82  Sinclair Broadcast Group