Quarterlytics / Energy / SNGN Romgaz SA

SNGN Romgaz SA

rz8g · LSE Energy
Claim this profile
Ticker rz8g
Exchange LSE
Sector Energy
Industry
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · SNGN Romgaz SA
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Societatea Nationala de Gaze 
Naturale “ROMGAZ” SA 

Board of Directors’ 
Report 

2017 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

This page was intentionally left blank  

Page 2 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Strategic Objectives 
Review of the Company’s Business 
Business Segments 
Historic Overview 

I. 
ROMGAZ 2017 Overview 
1.1. 
Highlights 
1.2. 
Romgaz in Figures 
1.3. 
Important Events 
II. 
The Company at a Glance 
2.1. 
Identification Data 
Company Organization 
2.2. 
2.3.  Mission, Vision and Values         
2.4. 
III. 
3.1. 
3.2. 
3.3.  Mergers and Organizations, Acquisitions and Divestments of Assets 
3.4. 
Company Business Performance 
3.4.1.  Company Overall Performance 
3.4.2.  Prices and Tariffs 
3.4.3.  Human Resources 
3.4.4.  Environmental Aspects 
3.4.5  Occupational Safety and Health 
Litigations 
3.4.6. 
Tangible Assets 
IV. 
4.1.  Main Production Facilities 
Investment 
4.2. 
Securities Market 
V. 
Dividend Policy 
5.1. 
Company Management 
VI. 
Board of Directors 
6.1. 
Executive Management 
6.2. 
Financial – Accounting Information 
VII. 
Statement of Financial Position 
7.1. 
Statement of Comprehensive Income 
7.2. 
7.3. 
Statement of Cash Flows 
VIII.  Corporate Governance 
IX. 
9.1. 
9.2. 

Performance of the Mandate Contract/Director’s Agreement 
Objectives and Performance Criteria  
2017 Results 

5 
5 
6 
12 
15 
15 
16 
17 
19 
20 
20 
24 
25 
29 
29 
33 
37 
40 
45 
46 
47 
47 
52 
57 
59 
62 
62 
63 
66 
66 
68 
71 
72 
88 
89 
91 

Page 3 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

This page was intentionally left blank  

Page 4 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Romgaz  obtained  the  approval  for  partial  financing  of  Iernut  power  plant  development 
from the National Investment Fund 

On  January  18,  2017  the  Ministry  of  Energy  notified  the  approval  of  the  Financing 
Application  for  the  investment  “Combined  Cycle  Gas  Turbine”,  application  submitted  for 
funds to be provided from the National Investment Plan. The Application File was submitted 
for the public acquisition contract No 13384/ October 31, 2016 concluded with the association 
Duro Felguera SA - SC Romelectro SA, having as scope the turnkey contract “Development 
of  Iernut  Power  Plant  (CTE  Iernut)  by  construction  of  a  new  gas  turbine  combined  cycle 
power plant”. On December 7, 2017 was signed the Contract for the grant for investment and 
on December 14, 2017 the first application for reimbursement was submitted to the Ministry 
of Energy. 

Romgaz obtained the approval for some petroleum agreements extension 

The volume of proved initial reserves increased for a number of natural gas commercial fields 
governed  by  petroleum  agreements,  following  the  performance  of  investment  works.  Thus, 
the period of gas recovery increased as compared to the initial estimation (which was below 
the legal limit of 30 years as provided under the Petroleum Law No 238/2004).  

Given  the  above  mentioned,  the  Government  of  Romania  approved  in  the  meeting  of 
September 27, 2017: 

  Licensing  petroleum  agreements  for  development-production  and  Licensing  Petroleum 
Agreements  for  production  concluded  between  the  National  Agency  for  Mineral 
Resources and Romgaz for 54 commercial fields;  

  Licensing  petroleum  agreements  for  development-production  concluded  between  the 
National  Agency  for  Mineral  Resources  and  Romgaz  and  Amromco  Energy  SRL  for  8 
commercial fields.  

Once such petroleum agreements approved, the licensing rights and consequentially the rights 
to exploit related blocks are confirmed, eliminating the risk mentioned in Romgaz Prospectus 
of the Initial Public Offering related to the validity of such petroleum agreements.   

Romgaz continues the development of Caragele project 

Romgaz  continues  the  development  of  the  field,  investments  reaching  EUR  40  million 
already.  Further  investment  of  about  EUR  100  million  will  follow  in  new  production  and 
development wells. A workshop will be added to the new structure to support the company’s 
activity in the area, as a consequence of intensification of the exploration program in North-
East Muntenia. The activity will consist in drilling exploration wells, building collecting and 
gathering  pipelines  connected  to  the  wells  proving  results  during  testing,  which  will  be 
brought into production.  

Page 5 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Reserve Status 
(bcm/% of total)

Contingent Resources Status 
(bcm/% of total)

12.8
15%

10.6 
13%

60.9
72%

32.4
64%

5.2
10%

12.9
26%

Proved

Probable

Possible

1C

2C

3C

Works  regarding  the  “Development  of  Iernut  Thermal  Power  Plant  by  Building  a  New 
Combined-Cycle Power Plant (CCGT)ˮ 

One of Romgaz’ strategic direction is consolidating its position on the energy supply markets. 
Thus, in the field of energy generation, the implementation of this investment project aims to 
enhance the efficiency of activity by: increasing the efficiency of the power plant to 56% at 
the  least,  compliance  with  the  environmental  requirements  (NOx,  CO2  emissions)  and 
enhancement of safety in exploitation.  The project  is  financed  from  own resources and PNI 
(National  Investment  Plan)  funds,  in  accordance  with  Government  Decision  No  1096/2013, 
updated.  Romgaz  concluded  the  works  contract  no  13384/  October  31,  2016  with  the 
Partnership  between  Duro  Felguera  S.A.  and  SC  Romelectro  S.A.  The  contract  may  be 
summarized as follows: (1) the scope of the contract is implementation of the turnkey project 
(design,  delivery  of  equipment,  supply  of  works  and  start-up)  “Development  of  the  Iernut 
Thermal  Power  Plant  by  Building  a  New  Combined-Cycle  Power  Plant  (CCGT)ˮ,  (2)  time 
limit for completion of works: 36 months from the date on which the contract enters into force 
(the  contract  enters  into  force  in  5  working  days  from  the  date  of  approving  the  file  of 
financing  from  PNI  funds,  in  accordance  with  the  Government  Decision  No  1096/2013, 
updated), (3) the estimated value of the contract (VAT excluded): EUR 268,836,329.82. 

During  2017  land  development  works  and  power-installed  foundation  anchors  works  have 
been performed. The documents for obtaining the authorizations for works and exploitation of 
the new power plant have been prepared. Construction authorizations for the new power plant 
and new hydrogen plant have been obtained. One gas turbine with its related equipment and 
the new hydrogen plant have been delivered. The technical design project is currently subject 
to approval. 

The  Company  recorded  a  net  profit  in  2017,  in  amount  of  RON  1,854.7  million,  higher  by 
81.03% than in 2016, namely by RON 830.2 million, and a net income per share of RON 4.81 
as compared to RON 2.66 in 2016. 

The net profit margins (40.5%), EBIT  margin (47.1%) and EBITDA (59.1%) are higher than 
the  ones  reported  last  year  (30.0%,  36.9%  and  46.0%  respectively),  confirming  that  the 
company continues to maintain a high profitability. 

Page 6 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Natural  gas  consumption  in  Romania  recorded  in  2017  an  increase  of  approx.  4.7%  as 
compared  to  the  previous  year,  according  to  the  ANRE  and  the  Company’s  consumption 
estimations1.  

The natural gas production of the Company was higher than in 2016 by 22.2%, namely 939 
million m3 (5,158 million m3 in 2017 vs 4,219 million m3 in 2016). This production, according 
to  estimated  data,  ensured  Romgaz  a  50.53%  market  share  of  gas  deliveries  within  the 
consumption  of  domestic  gas,  and  a  46.27%  market  share  of  deliveries  of  the  total 
consumption of Romania. 

The  2017  production  was  higher  than  the  one  recorded  in  the  previous  year  due  to  the 
cumulative factors below: 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

Lower  temperatures  during  the  first  period  of  the  year,  generating  a  higher  gas 
consumption in Q1; 

Significant increase of electricity production at the gas fuelled power plants;  

Increase of natural gas consumption by Romgaz’s Iernut power plant which consumed 
506 million m3 of natural gas, higher by 77 million m3 than in 2016; 

High summer temperatures leading to increased electricity consumption. 

The 2017 electricity production of Romgaz was 14.5% higher than 2016 production, namely 
1,863,788 MW and represents 2.68% of Romania’s total electricity production. According to 
Transelectrica, Romgaz’ market share was 2.95%. 

The  table  below  shows  a  summary  of  the  main  production  indicators,  royalty  and  storage 
services: 

Q4 
2016 

Q3 
2017 

Q4 
2017 

1,185 

1,023 

84 

1,192 

1,191 

83 

1,406 

1,393 

103 

Δ Q4 
(%) 

18.7 

36.2 

22.6 

Main indicators 

2016 

2017 

Gas production (million m3) 

Condensate production (tons) 
Petroleum royalty (million m3) 

4,219 

5,864 

292 

5,158 

5,742 

371 

726.3 

465.8 

398.3 

-45.2 

Electricity production(GWh) 

1,628.3 

1,863.8 

Δ ‘17/’16 
(%) 

22.2 

-2.1 

27.1 

14.5 

509.9 

9.7 

537.0 

5.3 

65.0 

774.3 

121.8 

87.4 

Invoiced  UGS  withdrawal  services 
(million m3) 
Invoiced  UGS  injection  services 
(million m3) 

1,440.9 

1,745.5 

21.1 

1,367.4 

1,497.6 

9.5 

Natural gas quantities produced, delivered, injected into and withdrawn from gas storages are 
shown in the table below (million m3):  

1 As ANRE did not publish the gas market monitoring reports from January 2017, the data used for national 
consumption are estimated data. 

Page 7 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
                                                           
Specifications 

2015 

2016 

2017 

Ratios 

Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Item 
No 
0 
1. 

1.1. 

1.2. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

Gross production – total, including: 

1 

    *own gas 

    *Schlumberger (100%) 

Technological consumption 

Net gas production (1.-1.2.-2.) 

Own gas injected into UGS 

Own gas withdrawn from UGS 

Difference from conversion to Gross Calorific Value 

Delivered own gas (3.-4.+5.-6.) 

2 
5,562.7 

3 
4,219.4 

4 
5,157.5 

5=4/3x100 
122.2% 

5,359.7 

4,068.0 

4,987.7 

122.6% 

203.1 

151.3 

169.8 

112.2% 

78.5 

54.5 

74.5 

136.7% 

5,281.1 

4,013.6 

4,913.2 

122.4% 

738.4 

409.5 

16.1 

414.7 

462.6 

4.5 

253.5 

61.1% 

723.5 

156.4% 

2.7 

4,936.1 

4,057.0 

5,380.5 

132.6% 

- 

79.2 

0.0 

-  

8.1.  Gas sold in UGS 

8.2.  Gas delivered to CTE Iernut and Cojocna from Romgaz’s 

527.0 

463.7 

506.4 

109.2% 

gas 

9. 

Own gas delivered to the market (7.+8.1.-8.2.) 

4,409.1 

3,672.5 

4,874.1 

132.7% 

10.  Gas from joint ventures– total, including: 

   *Schlumberger (50%) 
   *Raffles Energy*) (37.5%) 
   *Amromco*) (50%) 

11. 

Gas  purchase 
imbalances) 

from  domestic  production  (including 

168.9 

101.5 

0.5 

66.9 

17.1 

149.0 

175.5 

117.8% 

75.7 

0.3 

73.0 

11.2 

84.9 

112.2% 

0.1 

90.5 

27.0 

33.3% 

124.0% 

241.1% 

12. 

Traded domestic gas (9.+10.+11.) 

4,595.1 

3,832.7 

5,076.6 

132.5% 

13.  Gas delivered from domestic production (8.2+12.) 

5,122.1 

4,296.4 

5,583.0 

129.9% 

14. 

15. 

Delivered import gas 

Gas delivered gas to CTE Iernut and  Cojocna from other 
sources (including imbalances) 

3.0 

6.8 

4.8 

33.0 

40.3 

485.3% 

839.6% 

16. 

Total delivered gas (13.+14.+15.) 

5,125.1 

4,308.0 

5,656.3 

131.3% 

* 
 * 

Invoiced UGS withdrawal services 
 Invoiced UGS injection services 

1,656.7 

1,440.9 

1,745.5 

121.1% 

1,673.1 

1,367.4 

1,497.6 

 109.5% 

*)  –as  regards  Romgaz-Schlumberger    association,  produced  gas  is  fully  included  in  Romgaz  production,  and 
then  split  in  equal  shares  between  the  two  partners,  and  traded  separately.  With  respect  to  the  joint  ventures 
with Raffles Energy and Amromco, the obtained gas does not represent Romgaz production but the value of gas 
is  reflected  in  Romgaz  revenue,  proportionally  with  its  respective  participating  interest  share  in  the  joint 
ventures 

Natural  gas  production  lies  in  the  parameters  forecasted  in  the  2017  program,  achieving 
108.6% of the planned production (5,158 million m3 – achieved planned vs 4,750 million m3 
– planned). 

The production level was maintained by the ongoing production rehabilitation projects of the 
main fields, workover and recompletion operations for 188 wells, installing new compression 
capacities and bringing into production new fields.  

The natural gas production during 1997-2017 is shown below: 

Page 8 of 94 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

m
c
n
o

i
l
l
i

b

10

9,1

8,8

8,4

8

7,3

7

6,6

6,3

6,2

5,9

5,9

5,8

5,8

5,6

5,7

5,7

5,7

5,6

5,2

4,2

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Increase in Romgaz’s electricity production by 14.5% compared to previous year, as shown in 
the table below, is closely connected with reduced electricity production from hydro and wind 
sources, and to the cold or hot periods.  

The table below shows the quarterly electricity production for 2017, as compared to 2016:  

               *MWh* 

2016 

2 
318,720 

191,847 

391,472 

726,300 

2017 

3 
611,483 

388,249 

465,812 

398,300 

1,628,339 

1,863,844 

Variation  

4=(3-2)/2x100 
91.86% 

102.38% 

18.99% 

-45.16% 

14.46% 

1 
1st Quarter 
2nd Quarter 
3rd Quarter 
4th Quarter 

Year total 

Romgaz is one of the largest gas suppliers in Romania. The evolution of gas supplies2 during 
2008-2017 is indicated below: 

2 comprises own gas from domestic production, including gas delivered to CTE Iernut and Cojocna, 50% of the 
gas from Schlumberger joint venture and gas purchased from Romanian domestic production from other 
producers  

Page 9 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

7000

6000

5000

m
c
n
o

i
l
l
i

m

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

343

304

680

1018

606

310

81

3

5572

5563

5513

5200

5156

5304

5529

5055

33

5623

7

4223

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Gas from domestic production

Import gas

Q4 
2016 

Q3 
2017 

Q4 
2017 

Δ Q4         
(%) 

Main indicators 

2016 

2017 

Δ ‘17/’16 
(%) 

* million RON * 

1,010.3 

849.4  1,343.5 

989.3 

914.8  1,544.1 

33.0 

56.1 

Revenue 

Income 

627.2 

547.8 

362.1 

367.0 

51.3 

50.9 

310.9 

316.1 

763.7 

780.4 

109.7 

670.7 

Expenses 

21.8 
115.5  Gross profit 

Profit tax 
113.8 
115.7  Net profit  

358.1 

362.1 

773.7 

116.1 

EBIT 

n/a 

n/a 

529.3 

n/a 

EBIT (adjusted) *) 

312.6 

475.7 

914.9 

192.7 

EBITDA  

n/a 

0.8 

n/a 

0.8 

670.5 

n/a 

1.7 

112.5 

30.8 

37.2 

49.9 

62.0 

35.4 

42.6 

57.6 

62.7 

30.9 

56.0 

68.1 

120.4 

6,246 

6,194 

6,198 

-0.8 

EBITDA (adjusted) *) 

share  EPS 

Earnings  per 
(RON) 
Net  profit  ratio  (%  from 
Revenue) 
EBIT  Ratio 
Revenue) 
EBITDA  Ratio 
Revenue) 
Number  of  employees  at  the 
end of the period 

from 

from 

(% 

(% 

3,411.9  4,585.2 

3,816.8  4,786.0 

2,536.1  2,604.9 

1,280.7  2,181.2 

256.1 

326.4 

1,024.6  1,854.7 

1,258.6  2,158.8 

n/a  1,914.5 

1,569.6  2,707.7 

n/a  2,463.3 

2.7 

4.8 

34.4 

25.4 

2.7 

70.3 

27.5 

81.0 

71.5 

n/a 

72.5 

n/a 

77.8 

30.0 

40.5 

35.0 

36.9 

47.1 

27.6 

46.0 

59.1 

28.5 

6,246 

6,198 

-0.8 

 *)  Adjusted  EBIT/adjusted  EBITDA  are  EBIT/EBITDA  adjusted  by  the  income  recorded  following  the  fiscal 
audit completion related to excise, taking into account the single nature of such income  
The figures above are rounded and therefore there may be slight differences after reconciliation  
Note: income and expenses do not include in-house works capitalized as non-current assets. 

Page 10 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The higher revenue as compared to the previous year is mainly related to weather conditions, 
and especially due to the increased demand in the electricity generation sector. 

Due to the above mentioned causes and thanks to company efforts, the net profit, EBIT and 
EBITDA are significantly higher as compared to year 2016. At the same time, the indicator 
ratios against the revenue are higher than the ones recorded in the previous year and continue 
to be highly favourable: 40.5%, 47.1% and 59.1% (as compared to 30.0%, 36.9% and 46.0% 
in 2016), confirming the high profitability of the company. 

The previous years carried-forward results allocation, with a positive impact on the net profit, 
was in 2013 in amount of RON 157.5 million, in 2014 in amount of RON 241.90 million, in 
2015 in amount of RON 214.0 million and in 2016 in amount of RON 547.3 million. In 2017 
additional  dividends  in  amount  of  RON  747.7  million  have  been  approved  to  be  allocated 
from other reserves.  

Investments  play  an  important  part  in  arresting  the  production  decline,  which  is  achieved 
through the discovery of new reserves and the improvement of the current recovery rate due 
to the rehabilitation, development and modernization of existing facilities. 

For 2017, Romgaz scheduled investments worth RON 1,143 million and invested RON 781.8 
million, less by 31.6%. The 2017 investments were higher by 57.1% than the 2016 ones (RON 
497.7  million).  The  investments  were  financed  exclusively  from  own  sources,  and  a  part  of 
investments for CTE Iernut will be reimbursed from the National Investment Plan.  

The value of fixed assets commissioned during the reporting period was RON 392 million.  

During  2013-2017,  the  Company  made  investments  worth  approx.  RON  4.15  billion,  as 
follows: 

Year 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

Total 

Value     
(RON 
thousand) 

848,247 

1,085,497 

937,916 

497,716 

781,768 

4,151,144 

The structure of investments is shown in the chart below: 

23,82%

1,25%

5,47%

0,26%

0,30%

I. Exploration, production works

II. Investments in existing tangible assets
(development and modernization)

III. Sustaining the underground storage
capacity

IV. Independent equipment

V. Environment works

VI.  Expenses for studies and projects

68,91%

Since November 12, 2013, the company’s shares have been traded on the regulated market 
governed by BVB (Bucharest Stock Exchange) under the “SNG” symbol, and the GDRs on 
the regulated market governed by LSE (London Stock Exchange) under the “SNGR” symbol. 

Page 11 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Performance of Romgaz shares compared to the evolution of BET index (Bucharest Exchange 
Trading) from listing to December 31, 2017 is shown below: 

40,00

35,00

30,00

25,00

20,00

15,00

e
r
a
h
s
/
N
O
R

10,00

5,00

0,00

3
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
1
1

3
1
0
2
/
1
1
/
2
1

.

4
1
0
2
1
0
7
1

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
0
7
1

.

4
1
0
2
/
8
1
/
3

4
1
0
2
/
6
1
/
4

.

4
1
0
2
5
0
2
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
6
0
4
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
7
0
3
2

.

4
1
0
2
/
2
2
/
8

.

4
1
0
2
9
0
4
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
0
1
3
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
1
1
1
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
1
3
2

.

10000,00

9000,00

8000,00

7000,00

6000,00

5000,00

4000,00

3000,00

2000,00

1000,00

0,00

5
1
0
2
/
9
2
/
1

5
1
0
2
/
7
2
/
2

5
1
0
2
/
0
3
/
3

5
1
0
2
/
5
/
5

5
1
0
2
/
5
/
6

5
1
0
2
/
6
/
7

5
1
0
2
/
4
/
8

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
9

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
0
1

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
1
1

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
2
1

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
1

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
2

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
3

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
4

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
5

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
6

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
7

6
1
0
2
/
4
/
8

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
9

6
1
0
2
/
4
/
0
1

6
1
0
2
/
2
/
1
1

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
2
1

7
1
0
2
/
6
/
1

7
1
0
2
/
7
/
2

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
3

7
1
0
2
/
6
/
4

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
5

7
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
6

7
1
0
2
/
1
1
/
7

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
8

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
9

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
0
1

7
1
0
2
/
7
/
1
1

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
2
1

SNG

BET

March 14, 2017 

The  kick-off  meeting  of  the  project  for  “Developing  of  the  Iernut  Thermal  Power  Plant  by 
Building  a  New  Combined-Cycle  Power  Plant  (CCGT)ˮ  took  place  on  March  14,  2017  at 
SPEE  Iernut  between  the  representatives  of  Romgaz  and  those  of  Duro  Felguera  and 
Romelectro. 

April 1, 2017 
Prices of domestic production  gas  have been liberalized since April 1st, 2017 in  compliance 
with the GEO No 64/2016 for amending and supplementing the Electricity and Natural Gas 
Law No 123/2012. 

April 25, 2017 

By Resolution No 1/2017 of the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders: 

  The income and expenditure budget of the company for 2017 was approved; 
  The  members  of  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Societatea  Naţională  de  Gaze  Naturale 
Romgaz  S.A.,  namely  Dumitru  Chisăliţă,  Aristotel  Marius  Jude,  Stoicescu  Răzvan 
Florin, and Negruţ Aurora were revoked, following the expiration of their mandates in 
May 2017; 

  The  following  were  elected  as  interim  directors  of  Societatea  Naţională  de  Gaze 
Naturale  Romgaz  S.A.:  Stan  Bogdan  –  Nicolae,  Chirilă  Alexandru,  Gheorghe 
Gheorghe-Gabriel and Metea Virgil Marius.  

June 7, 2017  

By Resolution No 14 the Board of Directors approved the renewal of the Contract of Mandate 
for  the  Director-General,  Metea  Virgil-Marius  and  the  modification  of  2017  performance 
indicators as they were approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders in the income and 
expenditure budget.  

During the same meeting Gheorghe Gheorghe-Gabriel was elected as Chairman of the Board 
of Directors. 

Page 12 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

July 27, 2017 

The  Board  of  Directors  ascertained  under  Resolution  No  18  the  vacancy  of  one  director 
position, by resignation of Tcaciuc Sebastian-Gabriel, and appointed Baciu Sorana-Rodica as 
interim director until the next Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. 

September 7, 2017 

Further to company shareholders casting of cumulative vote upon the request of the Romanian 
State represented by the  Ministry of Energy, the  Ordinary General  Meeting of Shareholders 
elected as members of the Board of Directors for 4 months period the following: 

  Gheorghe Gheorghe-Gabriel; 
  Stan Bogdan-Nicolae; 
  Ciobanu Romeo-Cristian; 
  Nistoran Dorin-Liviu; 
  Cermonea Ioan-Daniel; 
  Grigorescu Remus; 
  Baciu Sorana-Rodica. 

September 27, 2017 

The Romanian Government approved the following: 

  The Licensing Petroleum Agreements for Development-Production and the Licensing 
Petroleum  Agreements  for  Production  concluded  between  the  National  Agency  for 
Mineral Resources and Romgaz for 54 commercial fields; 

  The  Licensing  Petroleum  Agreements  for  Development-Production  concluded 
between  the  National  Agency  for  Mineral  Resources  and  Romgaz  and  Amromco 
Energy S.R.L. for 8 commercial fields. 

October 17, 2017 

Iernut town hall issued the construction authorizations for  Developing of the  Iernut thermal 
power plant by building a new combined-cycle power plant. 

November 2, 2017 

By  Resolution  No  30  the  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Bobar  Andrei  as  Chief  Financial 
Officer.  

December 14, 2017 

  The  first  reimbursement  application  for  the  National  Investment  Plan  funds  for 

Development of CTE Iernut project was submitted to the Ministry of Energy. 

  By Resolution No 36 the Board of Directors revoked the Director General’s mandate 

for Metea Virgil Marius; 

  By Resolution No 37 the Board of Directors appointed Cindrea Corin Emil as interim 
Director  General  for  4  months  period,  with  the  possible  extension  of  6  months,  as 
provided under the law.  

December 20, 2017 

By  Resolution  No  9,  further  to  company  shareholders  casting  of  cumulative  vote  upon  the 
request  of the Romanian State represented by the Ministry of Energy, the  Ordinary  General 
Meeting of Shareholders elected as members of the Board of Directors, as of January 8, 2018, 
for 4 months mandate or until the completion of the directors selection process the following: 

  Nistoran Dorin-Liviu; 
  Baciu Sorana-Rodica; 

Page 13 of 94 

 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Ciobanu Romeo-Cristian; 
  Grigorescu Remus; 
  Cermonea Daniel-Ioan; 
  Volintiru Adrian-Constantin; 
  Anghel Daniel-Florin. 

Page 14 of 94 

 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Name: Societatea Nationala de Gaze Naturale “ROMGAZ” SA 
Main scope of activity: natural gas production and UGS 
Address: Medias, 4 Constantin I. Motas Square, 551130, Sibiu County 
Trade Registry registration number: J32/392/2001 
Fiscal registration number: RO14056826 
LEI Code: 2549009R7KJ38D9RW354 
Legal form of establishment: joint-stock company 
Subscribed and paid in share capital: RON 385,422,400  
Number of shares: 385,422,400 each having a nominal value of RON 1 
Regulated  market  where  the  company’s  shares  are  traded:  Bucharest  Stock  Exchange 
(shares) and London Stock Exchange (GDRs) 
0040 269 201020 
Phone:  
0040 269 846901 
Fax:        
Web:    
www.romgaz.ro 
E-mail: secretariat@romgaz.ro 

Bank  accounts  opened  at:  Banca  Comerciala  Romana,  BRD-Groupe  Societe  Generale, 
Citibank  Europe,  Patria  Bank,  Raiffeisen  Bank,  Banca  Transilvania,  ING  Bank,  Eximbank, 
CEC Bank. 

Shareholder Structure 

As of December 31, 2017 the shareholder structure is: 

The Romanian State3 

Free float – total, including: 
    *legal persons 
    *natural persons 

Total 

FREE 
FLOAT
30%

Number of 
shares 

Number of shares 

269,823,080 

115,599,320 
96,797,982 
18,801,338 

385,422,400 

% 

% 

70.0071 

29.9929 
25.1148 
4.8781 

100.0000 

The 
Romanian 
State
70%

3 The Romanian State through the Ministry of Energy 

Page 15 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

During the financial year 2017, the Company did not perform transactions with own shares, 
and as of December 31, 2017 did not hold own shares. 

Romgaz organization structure is a hierarchy-functional type, with a number of six hierarchy 
levels, from company’s shareholders to execution personnel, as follows: 

  General Meeting of Shareholders 

  Board of Directors 

  Director General 

  Deputy Directors General  

  Heads  of  functional  and  operational  compartments  subordinated  to  the  Director 

General and to the Deputy Directors General 

  Execution Personnel 

The  responsibilities  of  the  Board  of  Directors  are  detailed  in  the  Company’s  Articles  of 
Incorporation and as well in its Rules of Organization and Operation. 

Key people in the structure and for the functionality of the company are the Director General, 
the  Deputy  Directors  General,  Economic  Director,  as  well  as  the  branches’  directors.  The 
heads  of  compartments  (branches/departments/directions/offices  etc.)  representing 
the 
connection between the upper structure and the employees of the respective compartment are 
directly subordinated to the afore-mentioned.  

Each compartment  has its own well-defined attributions in  the company’s Organization and 
Operating Regulation and all these elements work as a whole. 

The tasks, competencies and responsibilities of the execution personnel are included in the job 
descriptions related to each position. 

The company has 7 branches set up based on the specific of the activities performed and on 
the region (natural gas production branches) as follows: 

  Sucursala Medias (Medias Branch) having its office in Medias, 5 Garii Street, postal 

code 551025, Sibiu County, territorially organized in 8 sections; 

  Sucursala  Targu  Mures  (Targu  Mures  Branch)  having  its  office  in  Tirgu  Mures,  23 
Salcamilor  Street,  postal  code  540202,  Mures  county,  territorially  organized  in  8 
sections; 

  Sucursala Ploiesti (Ploiesti Branch) having its  office in  Ploiesti, 184  G. Cantacuzino 
Street, 100492, Prahova County, territorially organized in 2 sections and 2 workshops; 

  Sucursala  de  Interventii,  Reparatii  Capitale  si  Operatii  Speciale  la  Sonde  Medias 
(SIRCOSS – Branch for Well Workover, Recompletions and Special Well Operations) 
having  its  office  in  Medias,  5  Soseaua  Sibiului  Street,  551009,  Sibiu  County, 
territorially organized in 3 sections and 5 workshops; 

  Sucursala  de  Transport  Tehnologic  si  Mentenanta  Targu  Mures  (STTM  – 
Technological Transport and Maintenance Branch) having its office in Targu Mures, 6 
Barajului  Street,  540101,  Mures  County,  territorially  organized  in  3  sections  and  3 
workshops; 

  Sucursala  de  Productie  Energie  Electrica  Iernut  (SPEE  –  Iernut  Power  Generation 

Branch) having its office in Iernut,  1 Energeticii Street, 545100, Mures County; 

Page 16 of 94 

 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Sucursala Bratislava (Bratislava Branch) having its office in Bratislava, City Business 

Centre V.-Karadžičova 16, code 82108, Slovakia. 

As of December 31, 2017 the company has a subsidiary “S.N.G.N. ROMGAZ S.A. – Filiala 
de  Înmagazinare  Subterană  a  Gazelor  Naturale  DEPOGAZ  Ploieşti  S.R.L.”,  with  its 
headquarters in Ploiesti, having as scope of activity the natural gas underground storage. The 
subsidiary  has  been  set  up  in  order  to  comply  with  Directive  2009/73/EC  of  the  European 
Parliament and of the Council of July 13, 2009  on common rules for the internal  market  in 
natural  gas  and  repealing  Directive  2003/55/EC,  as  well  as  with  the  Natural  Gas  and 
Electricity Law No 123/2012. 

Societatea  Nationala  de  Gaze  Naturale  “ROMGAZ”  SA  is  a  company  which  targets 
performance and is determined to generate performance by best employment of energies to 
meet its objectives.

Performance, competition and continuous growth of the company’s value both for us and for 
the  shareholders  by  means  of  a  better  valuation  of  the  human  potential  and  assets,  by 
predictable and profitable business deals and  a better risk management. 

ROMGAZ has the potential and the ambition to consolidate and to develop its position as the 
most important natural gas company in Romania and to become a leading player on important 
Central  and Eastern European markets  by  means of  an  efficient and competitive production 
able to face the increasing pressure exercised by regional and international companies. 

Page 17 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Increasing 
the 
company's 
value for its 
shareholders

Care for the 
environment

Quality 
products 
and services

Efficiency

ROMGAZ

Safety for 
the 
employees

Social 
responsibility

Transparency

Sustainable 
development

Page 18 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

In  order  to  meet  its  main  scope  of  activity  through  an  efficient  use  of  material,  financial, 
informational and human resources, the company set the following 

:  

Increase of the gas resources and reserves portfolio through the discovery of new 
resources and the improvement of the recovery rate of already discovered resources 

Position consolidation on the energy supply markets

Optimization, development and diversification of the UGS activity by reconsidering its 
importance in terms of safety, continuity and flexibility of the natural gas supply

Increasing the company's performance

Identification of new growth and diversification opportunities

Improving the organization structure of the company

Reorganization of the internal audit function

Page 19 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The company undertakes business in the following segments: 

  natural gas exploration and production; 

  UGS activity; 

  natural gas supply; 

  special well operations and services; 

  maintenance and transportation services; 

  power generation and supply; 

  natural gas distribution. 

Romgaz is titleholder or co-titleholder, in Romania, of the following petroleum agreements: 

  petroleum operations for exploration-development-production in 9 blocks with  100% 
participating  interest  and  in  4  blocks  as  co-titleholder,  under  certain  concession 
agreements; 

  154 commercial fields; 

  7 fields recording experimental production; 

  exploration and production rights in Slovakia and Poland (until June 2017). 

Exploration 

Since October 1997, the exploration activity has been carried out in 8 blocks in Transylvania, 
Moldova, Muntenia, and Oltenia, in accordance with the Concession Agreement approved by 
Government Decision No 23/2000. Fourteen exploration wells were completed in 2017, with 
the following results:   

  5 discoveries with a prospective geological resource (P50) of 3.5 billion m3; 

  confirmation of hydrocarbon accumulations with a contingent resource (2C) evaluated 

at approx. 0.9 billion m3.  

Romgaz designs and plans all exploration works based on its own concepts by using modern 
specialized  software,  evaluations  of  the  geological  area’s  prospectivity  displaying  specific 
features  within  the  blocks  under  concession,  and  these  are  carried  out  by  specific  surface 
exploration  methods  for  the  identification  of  the  areas  with  hydrocarbon  accumulations 
(prospects), followed by exploration drilling to prove the presence of accumulations. 

The results materialised in reserve replacement ratios, with a highest value of 323% reached 
in 2012. 

Page 20 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The table below shows the evolution of the reserves replacement ratio during 2009-2017: 

323

155

92

49

94

82

70

102

42

%

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Reserves  replacement  ratio  was  influenced  by  the  reduced  volume  of  updating  commercial 
reservoirs  and  by  postponing  investments  related  to  the  infrastructure  necessary  for 
commissioning  production  facilities.  The  reserves  audit  as  of  December  31,  2017  will  be 
finalized in H1 2018. 

Production 

The 2017 annual program for petroleum operations considered the 
dynamics  of  gas  demand,  reactivation,  recompletion  and  well 
work  over  operations,  bringing  in  production  wells  resulted  from 
exploration activities and production wells, maintenance programs 
of compressor stations and of dehydration stations, commissioning 
of  new  compressor  units  and  the  dynamics  of  import  gas  flows 
injected into/withdrawn from UGS. 

The  company’s  gas  production  was  higher  than  the  2016  production  (5,158  million  m3vs 
4,219 million m3). According to estimates, this production ensured Romgaz a 50.53% market 
share  of  deliveries  in  the  gas  consumption  from  internal  production  and  a  46.27%  share  of 
deliveries in Romania’s total consumption. 
The production in amount of 5,158 million m3 was 8.6% higher than the planned one, due to: 

  Lower temperatures at the beginning of 2017; 

 

 

Increase of gas consumption for generation of electricity; 

Increase of gas consumption for generation of electricity by Romgaz’s Iernut power 
plant which consumed 506 million m3 of gas, by 77 million m3 more than in 2016. 

  Higher summer temperatures leading to the increase of electricity consumption. 

Page 21 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Currently,  in  Romania  there  are  8  UGSs  constructed  in 
depleted  gas  reservoirs  out  of  which  7  are  in  operation. 
Romgaz owns and operates 6 UGSs having a total capacity 
of  4.335  billion  m3  and  a  working  gas  volume  of  2.920 
billion m3. 

At national level, the ratio between the working gas volume and the annual consumption was 
about  24%  in  2017.  This  level  is  in  the  first  upper  half  of  2015  international  values  (Great 
Britain  6.4%,  Spain  9.8%,  Holland  40.6%,  Poland  19.9%,  Italy  26.2%,  Germany  29.8%, 
France 29.5%, Denmark 33.6%, and Hungary 69.6%). 

In 2017 the ratio of stored gas volumes to the working volume of the UGS’s was 69%. 

Related  to  the  obligation  of  each  titleholder  of  gas  supply  license  to  store  a  minimum  gas 
stock in the UGS’s, Romgaz stored more gas by 283%. 

The UGS activity is a business segment regulated by ANRE (National Authority for Energy 
Regulation) with regard to UGS operators’ licensing and the access to the UGSs, as well as 
setting the tariffs related to UGS activity. 

After a thorough restructuring, the natural gas sector is currently 
split  into  independent  activities.  The  Romanian  natural  gas 
market  includes  a  NTS  operator  (Transgaz),  producers  (Romgaz 
and Petrom have a 97% market share), UGS operators, companies 
for  the  distribution  and  supply  of  gas  to  captive  customers,  and 
suppliers on the wholesale market. 

The natural  gas market in Romania consists of the  competition segment, which includes gas 
trading  activities  between  suppliers  and  between  suppliers  and  eligible  consumers,  and  the 
regulated  segment,  which  includes  monopoly-like  activities  performed  in  accordance  with 
framework  contracts  (transmission,  underground  storage,  distribution  and  supply  at  a 
regulated price).  

In terms of supply, Romgaz held during 2010-2017 a national market share ranging between 
37 and 46%: 

M.U. 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

National consumption 

traded 
Romgaz 
volumes  (domestic  + 
import) 

bcm 

bcm 

14.0 

14.4 

13.5 

12.5 

12.2 

11.6 

11.8 

12.3 

6.4 

6.3 

5.9 

5.7 

5.7 

5.1 

4.4 

5.7 

Romgaz market share 

% 

45.81  43.87  42.82 

44.5 

46.1 

44.0 

37.1 

46.3 

The  above  quantities  include  gas  from  own  domestic  production,  domestic  gas  purchased 
from third parties, 100% gas from Schlumberger joint venture and import gas. As compared 
to previous years, 2017 deliveries include gas delivered to Iernut and Cojocna for electricity 
production, as well as technological consumption.  

Page 22 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

SIRCOSS  was  established  in  2003  in  accordance  with  the  GSM  Resolution  No5/June  13, 
2003.  

The branch performs two types of activities:  

  well workover, recompletion operations and production tests; 

  special well operations. 

All well workover, recompletion operations and production tests operations are performed by 
means of rig installations. 

The second activity consists of special well operations, namely services supplied by means of 
different transportable equipment for downhole or surface operations. 

During  the  past  years  most  of  services  were  supplied  for  the  wells  within  the  company’s 
portfolio,  yet,  well  workover  and  special  well  operations  were  also  supplied  to  other 
companies in Romania that have under concession and operate gas wells in Romania. 

STTM was established in October 2003, by taking over the means of transportation from Medias, 
Targu-Mures and Ploiesti branches. 

The  branch’s  scope  of  activity  is  the  transportation  of  goods  and  people,  the  specific 
technological transportation, and the maintenance activity for the benefit of the company and 
of third parties. 

CTE Iernut is an important junction point in the National Power Grid located in the centre of 
the country, in Mures County on the left bank of Mures River between towns Iernut and Cuci. 
Gas supply, industrial water and power discharge facilities are forthcoming. 

CTE Iernut is operated under Romgaz Electricity Generation Branch (SPEE). 

CTE  Iernut  has  an  installed  capacity  of  600  MW  split  into  4  energy  groups:  two  100  MW 
energy  units  of  Czechoslovakian  manufacturing  and  two  200  MW  energy  units  of  Soviet 
manufacturing.  The  groups  were  commissioned  between  1963  and  1967.  As  of  January  1, 
2016, the energy units 2 and 3 were put into a dry storage condition. 

Cojocna  Project  is  an  outcome  of  the  pressing  need  of  finding  ways  to  experimentally 
produce  from  a  series  of  wells  resulted  from  exploratory  drilling,  in  order  to  determine,  as 
detailed as possible, the production potential of the respective area. The wells were located far 
from each other and also from the National Transmission System (NTS). 

Thus,  during  2009-2010  solutions  were  sought,  feasibility  and  opportunity  studies  were 
prepared,  and  further  to  their  approval  it  was  decided  to  use  the  gas  from  wells  2  and  4 
Cojocna  as  fuel  gas  for  two  1.5  MW  power  generation  units,  bearing  in  mind  that  the 
connection to the National Energy System (NES) didn’t raise any major issue.  

This power generation pilot project using units that do not require special installations works 
is an alternate option for gas production and valorisation from isolated wells that would imply 
building kilometre long gathering pipes, thus, representing a not justifiable option due to the 
high costs and multiple impediments related to access on outside build-over areas belonging 
to legal or individual persons. 

Commissioning the two electricity production units using the gas from wells 2 and 4 Cojocna 
was  a  technological  success  but  unfortunately  a  short  termed  one,  because  of  reduced  gas 
flows that led to intermittent operation of wells and units.  

Page 23 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Our specialists focused during year 2015 both on productivity stimulation from both wells (re-
perforation of productive layers, addition of new pay zones) and on setting the best layout of 
gathering  pipes  where  other  isolated  wells  may  deliver,  ensuring  thereby  the  necessary  gas 
volumes for both units. 

Further  to  approving  a  feasibility  study,  it  has  been  decided  to  implement  the  scenario  on 
building  a  pipeline  network  to  collect  gas  from  the  neighbouring  wells  and  transmission  of 
gas to the two power generation units (in progress). 

In  2016,  the  documentation  prepared  in  accordance  with  Law  No  50  as  of  June  29,  1991 
regarding  authorization  of  construction  work  performance  was  filed  at  the  Cluj  County 
Council,  regarding  the  work:  „Pipelines  and  Technological  Installations  related  to  Putting 
wells 1 Palatca, 1 Vaida and 2 Vaida on Experimental Production”. 
Starting  with  the  4th  Quarter  of  2017,  the  electrical  equipment  is  fuelled  by  the  above 
mentioned wells. 

The  natural  gas  distribution  is  a  regulated  business  segment  and  the  company’s  activity  is 
currently  limited  to  Ghercesti  and  Piscu  Stejari  areas.  Romgaz  has  concession  agreements 
with the Ministry of Economy for Ghercesti area and with Piscu Stejari Town Hall for Piscu 
Stejari distribution. The activity is carried out by Targu-Mures Branch. 

Societatea Nationala de Gaze Naturale “ROMGAZ” SA is 
Romania’s  most  important  natural  gas  producer  and 
supplier.  The  company’s  experience  in  the  field  of  gas 
exploration  and  production  exceeds  100  years.  Its  history 
began  in  1909  when  the  first  natural  gas  commercial 
reservoir was discovered in the Transylvanian Basin upon 
the drilling of well Sarmasel-2. 

The most important historic benchmarks are: 

Page 24 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

•Natural gas discovery in Sarmasel (Transylvanian Basin)

•First gas production recorded in Romania (113,000 m3)

•Establishment of the National Gas Company "SONAMETAN" 

•First UGS in Romania constructed in Ilimbav, Sibiu County

•Use of compressors in the course of production

•Maximum gas production obtained by Romgaz (29,834 million m3)

•The natural gas import from the Russian Federation begins

•Centrala Gazului Metan was reorganized to Regia Autonoma "ROMGAZ" RA

•"ROMGAZ" RA became Societatea Nationala de Gaze Naturale "ROMGAZ" SA

•SNGN "ROMGAZ" SA was reorganized into five independent companies (SC 
"Exprogaz" SA Medias, SNDSGN "Depogaz" SA Ploiesti, SNTGN "Transgaz" SA 
Medias, SC "Distrigaz Sud" SA Bucuresti SC "Distrigaz Nord" SA Tirgu-Mures)

• The current SNGN "ROMGAZ" SA Medias was established

1909

1913

1925

1958

1972

1976

1979

1991

1998

2000

2001

Unbundling of underground gas storage activity 

In compliance with European and national applicable laws, Romgaz has to legally unbundle 
the gas storage activity from gas production and supply activities. 

Further to adopting Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and Council on July 13, 
2009 concerning common rules of the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 
2003/55/EC, the Romanian Parliament adopted the Energy and Gas Law No 123/2012. This 
was  published  in  the  Official  Gazette  of  Romania  No  485  on  July  16,  2012  and  became 
effective on July 20, 2012.  

Page 25 of 94 

 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

According to the provisions of article 141, paragraph 1 of the Law (which transcribes article 
15,  paragraph  1  of  the  Directive)  a  storage  operator  under  a  vertically  integrated  economic 
operator  must  be  independent  from  other  activities  not  related  to  transmission,  distribution 
and  underground  storage  activities  at  least  from  legal,  organizational  and  decision-making 
perspective. 

Therefore, considering the above mentioned matters, it is compulsory to legally separate the 
gas storage activity from the gas production and supply activities performed by Romgaz by 
establishing a separate company to act as independent storage operator.  

Both  the Directive and the  Law recommend as  solution  to  set up an independent  subsidiary 
that should act as storage operator, as follows: 

  Article  15  paragraph  2  let.  c)  of  the  Directive  provides  that:  “the  storage  system 
operator shall have effective decision making rights, independent from the integrated 
natural  gas  undertaking,  with  respect  to  assets  necessary  to  operate,  maintain  or 
develop  the  storage  facilities.  This  shall  not  preclude  the  existence  of  appropriate 
coordination mechanisms to ensure the economic and management supervision rights 
of  the  parent  company  in  respect  of  return  on  assets  in  a  subsidiary  are  protected 
[…]” 

  Article  141  paragraph  3  let.  c)  of  the  Law  also  provides  that:  “the  storage  system 
operator  shall  have  effective  decision  making  rights,  independent  from  the  parent 
company, with respect to assets necessary to operate, maintain or develop the storage 
facilities; 
the  existence  of  appropriate  coordination 
mechanisms to ensure the economic and management supervision rights of the parent 
company in respect of return on assets owned by a subsidiary are protected”. 

this  shall  not  preclude 

For  fulfilling  the  legal  requirements  set  by  the  Directive  and  by  Law,  respectively,  the 
following steps have been taken: 

  a  study  has  been  prepared  to  identify  the  best  version  for  performing  the  legal 
unbundling of the storage activity from the gas production and supply activity. The 
solution recommended by Ernst&Young was to create an independent subsidiary, 
owned 100% by Romgaz to perform gas storage activities; 

  the Board of Directors, endorsed in Resolution No 22/30.10.2014 at article 10 the 
incorporation, registration an declaration to the Trade Office Register by Prahova 
Court the subsidiary “SNGN Romgaz SA – Filiala de Inmagazinare Gaze Naturale 
“Depogaz” Ploiesti S.R.L.”; 

  the  Extraordinary  General  Meeting  of  Shareholders  approved  by  Resolution  No 
10/19.12.2014  (item  II) to set  up the subsidiary  “SNGN Romgaz SA  –  Filiala de 
Inmagazinare Gaze Naturale “Depogaz” Ploiesti S.R.L.”; 

  On March 17, 2015, the General Meeting of Shareholders approved the Article of 

Incorporation of the subsidiary; 

  A  consultancy  agreement  on  “Assistance  in  performing  the  legal  unbundling    of 
UGS activity in accordance with applicable law (Law No 123/2012 on Energy and 
natural  gas  and  European  Directive  2009/73/EC)”  has  been  concluded  and  the 

Page 26 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Final Report prepared by the consultancy agency (K.P.M.G.) was submitted to the 
National Authority for Energy Regulation; 

  The  Company  has  submitted  a  request  to  the  National  Agency  for  Fiscal 
Administration  for  an  advanced  tax  ruling  (SFIA  –  Solutie  Fiscala  Individuala 
Anticipata); 

  During the Board of Directors Meeting on August 13, 2015 the fixed assets lease 
Agreement to be concluded between SNGN Romgaz SA and subsidiary has been 
endorsed.  

  The  following  agreements  have  been  concluded  between  the  company  and 

subsidiary: 

a)  The Agreement No 9523 as of September 22, 2015 regarding the lease of 

fixed assets 

b)  The  Agreement  No  9525  as  of  September  22,  2015  regarding  services 
related  to  gas  compression  and  gas  dehydration  and  services  related  to 
maintenance of the underground gas storage system; 

  ANRM  issued  the  Attestation  Certificate  No  1691  as  of  October  1st,  2015 
certifying  that  the  subsidiary  meets  the  Attestation  Procedure  requirements  and 
agreed  that the subsidiary (operator) may perform the petroleum operations in the 
blocks where the UGS are located; 

  By Resolution No 2588 as of December 30, 2015, ANRE amends the Licence No 
1942/2014  on  operation  of  UGS  system  by  changing  the  owner  from  SNGN 
ROMGAZ  SA  Medias  into  SC  SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA-  Filiala  de  Inmagazinare 
Gaze Naturale “Depogaz” Ploiesti S.R.L, and shall be valid  as of April 1st, 2016;  

  the  executive  management  will  urgently  initiate  the  procedure  for  selecting  the 
subsidiary’s  administrators.  This  procedure  must  comply  with  the  independence 
criterion  stipulated  in  Directive  2009/73/EC  and  implemented  in  Electricity  and 
Natural  Gas  Law  No  123/2012,  as  amended  and  supplemented,  and  will  consult 
the  competent  institutions/authorities  so  that  the  new  company  obtains  the 
endorsements/approvals  necessary  for  performing  the  activities  included  in  the 
main activity.  

  By Decision No 446 as of March 23, 2016, ANRE postponed until April 1, 2017 
the  entering  into  force  of  the  Decision  No  2588  as  of  December  30,  2015  on 
modifying  the  License  No  1942/2014  on  operating  the  UGS  system,  in  terms  of 
changing  the  titleholder  of  such,  namely  from  SNGN  ROMGAZ  S.A  Mediaș  to 
SC SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. - Filiala de Inmagazinare Subterana a Gazelor Naturale 
DEPOGAZ Ploiesti SRL; 

  the National Agency for Fiscal Administration issued the final advanced tax ruling 
A-RFC 1527/September 05, 2016 as regards profit tax and applicable VAT, for the 
operations described by Romgaz, with the purpose of separating the UGS activity 
from the production activity and the supply activity. 

Page 27 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  By Decision No 474 of March 30, 2017, ANRE postponed until April 1st, 2018 the 
entering into force of the Decision No 2588 of December 30, 2015 on modifying 
the License No 1942/2014 on operating the UGS system, in terms of changing the 
titleholder  of  such,  namely  from  SNGN  ROMGAZ  S.A  Mediaș  to  SC  SNGN 
ROMGAZ  S.A.  -  Filiala  de  Inmagazinare  Subterana  a  Gazelor  Naturale 
DEPOGAZ Ploiesti SRL; 

  By Resolution No 01/19.04.2017 of SNGN ROMGAZ S.A Mediaş, acting as the 
Sole Owner, the activity of  SC SNGN ROMGAZ S.A.  -  Filiala de  Înmagazinare 
Subterană  a Gazelor Naturale DEPOGAZ Ploieşti SRL has  been suspended until 
April 1st, 2018. 

A series of changes to the organizational structure have been performed during 2017:  

  By Decision No 59 of the Director General as of February 14, 2017 on modifying the 
organizational structure of SNGN ROMGAZ S.A., the GMS and BD Secretary Office 
was  eliminated  from  the  Corporate  Governance  Department  and  the  GMS  and  BD 
Secretary  Department  was  created  under  the  direct  subordination  of  the  Director 
General. 

  By  Decision  No  131  of  the  Director  General  as  of  July  6,  2017  on  modifying  the 
organizational structure of Ploieşti branch the position of chief engineer was created. 

  By Decisions of the Director General No 262/26.07.2017 – Romgaz Headquarters, No 
264/26.07.2017  –Mediaș  Branch,  No  266/26.07.2017  –Târgu  Mureș  Branch,  No 
268/26.07.2017  –Ploiești  Branch,  No  270/26.07.2017  –  SIRCOSS  Mediaș,  No 
272/26.07.207  –  STTM  Târgu  Mureș,  No  274/26.07.2017  –  SPEE  Iernut  the  legal 
requirements  provided  under  the  law  on  sectoral  public  acquisition  have  been 
implemented.  

  By  Decision  No  306/05.09.2017  on  modifying  the  organizational  structure  of  SPEE 
Iernut  the  Investment  Department  was  created,  in  charge  to  carry  on  the  project  on 
development and modernization of the thermal power plant under implementation; 

  By  Decision  of  the  Director  General  No  371/30.10.2017  on  modifying  the 
organizational  structure  of  Târgu  Mureș  Branch  a  new  production  workshop  was 
established,  namely  Caragele  Production  Workshop  in  charge  with  the  management 
and operation of Caragele gas field; 

  By  Resolution  No  30/02.11.2017  of  the  Board  of  Directors  on  modifying  the 
organizational  structure  of  the  company  headquarters  by  turning  the  GMS  and  BD 
Secretary Department into Office.  

No mergers of the company took place in financial year 2017.  

Page 28 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The  Company’s  revenues  are  generated  mainly  from  gas  production  and  delivery  (own  gas 
production  and  delivery,  gas  produced  by  joint  ventures,  import  gas  deliveries  and  gas 
deliveries from other domestic producers), from supply of underground gas storage services, 
from production and supply of electric energy and from other specific services. 

Description 

2016 

2017 

Item 
No 
0 
1 

2 
3 

1 
Total Income, out of which: 
    *operating income 
    *financial income 
Revenue 
Expenses, out of which: 
    *operating expenses 
    *financial expenses 

4  Gross Profit 
5 
6 

Income Tax 
Net Profit  

2 
3,816,770 
3,794,123 
22,647 

3,411,868 
2,536,075 
2,516,978 
19,097 

1,280,695 
256,116 
1,024,579 

3 
4,786,046 
4,762,914 
23,132 

4,585,189 
2,604,855 
2,584,314 
20,541 

2,181,191 
326,443 
1,854,748 

* RON thousand * 

Ratio 
(2017/2016) 
4=3/2x100 

125.40% 
125.53% 
102.14% 

134.39% 
102.71% 
102.68% 
107.56% 

170.31% 
127.46% 
181.03% 

The Total Income was higher than the 2016 income by 25.4%. 

Below are the compared economic-financial indicators for 2016 and 2017 and their detailed 
structure split by activity: 

Compared economic-financial indicators 

Description 

2016  

2017  

* RON thousand * 

Indices 
(2017/2016) 

1 

Revenue 

Cost of commodities sold 

Investment Income 

Other gains and losses 

Changes in inventories 
Raw materials and 
consumables 
Depreciation, amortization 
and impairment 
Employee benefit expense 

Finance cost 

Exploration Expenses 

Other Expenses 

Other Income 

2 

3 

4=3/2x100 

3,411,868 
  (49,878) 
     22,117 
(468,218) 
     20,963 

4,585,189 
(61,095) 
22,349 
(120,335) 
(186,651) 

   (54,632) 

(64,329) 

 (311,012) 
 (498,114) 
    (18,275) 
  (253,348) 
  (881,923) 
    361,147 

(548,869) 
(562,883) 
(18,624) 
(137,083) 
(1,090,647) 
364,169 

34.39% 
22.49% 
1.05% 
-74.3% 
n/a 

17.75% 

76.48% 
13.00% 
1.91% 
-45.89% 
23.67% 
0.84% 

Page 29 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Profit before tax 

Income tax expense 

Profit for the year 

Structure of indicators split by activity-2016  

Description 

TOTAL 

2016,           

1 

Revenue 

including: 

2 
3,411,868 

Gas 
production 
and 
deliveries 
3 

2,857,683 

1,280,695  
  (256,116) 
1,024,579  

2,181,191 
(326,443) 
1,854,748    

70.31% 
27.46% 
81.03% 

Undergroun
d Gas 
Storage 

Electrici
ty 

* RON thousand * 
Settlemen
Other 
t between 
activities 
segments 

4 
358,568 

5 
399,042 

6 

7 

239,230 

(442,655) 

Cost of commodities sold 

(49,878) 

(18,443) 

(432) 

(30,229) 

Investment Income 

Other gains and losses 

Changes in inventories 

22,117 

844 

(468,218) 

(445,340) 

20,963 

2,765 

3,949 

(1,915) 

13,522 

(774) 

17,284 

40 

(445) 

(20,518) 

233 

4,443 

(54,632) 

(37,389) 

(7,142) 

(1,460) 

(10,660) 

2,019 

Raw materials and 
consumables 
Depreciation, 
amortization and 
impairment 
Employee benefit 
expense 
Finance cost 

(311,012) 

(185,959) 

(95,784) 

(6,940) 

(22,329) 

(498,114) 

(313,449) 

(47,163) 

(30,028) 

(107,474) 

Exploration Expenses 

 (253,348) 

(253,348) 

- 

(18,275) 

(16,674) 

(1,601) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Other Expenses 

Other Income 

Profit before tax 

Income tax expense 

Profit for the year 

(881,923) 

(915,298) 

(91,057) 

(256,113) 

(61,076) 

 441,621 

361,147 

356,420 

2,223 

122 

1,280,695  

1,031,812  

133,168 

74,222 

3,367 

41,493 

 (256,116) 

- 

- 

- 

(256,116) 

1,024,579  

1,031,812  

133,168 

74,222 

(214,623) 

(985) 

-   

-   

-   

Description 

Structure of indicators split by activity-2017  
Gas 
production 
and 
deliveries 
3 

2017,           

including: 

TOTAL 

2 

1 

Revenue 

4,585,189 

3,760,366 

* RON thousand * 

Underground 
gas  
storage 

Electrici
ty 

Other 
activities 

Settlement 
between 
segments 

4 
566,246 

5 

6 

7 

545,317 

264,544 

(551,284) 

Cost of commodities sold 

 (61,095) 

 (50,038) 

 (7) 

 (10,313) 

 (737) 

Investment income 

22,349 

 321  

 1,487  

 26  

 20,515  

Other gains and losses 

(120,335) 

 (82,564) 

 (3,271) 

 (1,672) 

 (32,828) 

(186,651) 

 (117,084) 

 (72,025) 

 124  

 2,334  

(64,329) 

 (46,681) 

 (9,695) 

 (1,167) 

 (10,369) 

3,583 

(548,869) 

 (420,252) 

 (103,818) 

 (6,560) 

 (18,239) 

(562,883) 

 (357,407) 

 (54,821) 

 (33,432) 

(117,223) 

Finance cost  

(18,624) 

 (16,848) 

 (1,776) 

Exploration expense 

 (137,083) 

(137,083) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Other expenses 

Other income 

Profit before tax 

(1,090,647) 

(1,108,629) 

 (75,003) 

 (389,388) 

 (66,063) 

 548,436 

364,169  

362,945 

198 

39 

1,722 

(735) 

2,181,191 

 1,787,046  

 247,515  

 102,974  

 43,656  

-   

Page 30 of 94 

Changes in inventories 
Raw materials and 
consumables 
Depreciation, amortization 
and impairment 
Employee benefit expense 

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

- 

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Income tax expense 

Profit for the year 

(326,443) 

- 

- 

- 

(326,443) 

1,854,748 

 1,787,046  

 247,515  

 102,974  

 (282,787) 

-   

-   

The table below  compares the 2017 revenue with the 2016 revenue, for  each  activity (RON 
thousand):  

Description 

1 

Revenue, including: 

  gas production and deliveries activity, including: 

       * sale of own domestic gas – third parties 

       * sale of own domestic gas-settlements between branches 

       * sale of own domestic gas produced by joint ventures 

       * sale of import gas 

       * sale of domestic gas from acquisitions 

       * distribution services 

       * other revenues from production- third parties 

  underground gas storage activity-total, including: 

       * third parties 

       * settlements between branches 

  Electricity generation – total, including: 

       * third parties 

       * settlements between branches 

  Other activities – total, including: 

       * third parties 

       * settlements between branches 
  settlements between branches – total 

2016 

2017 

Ratios          

2 

3 

3,411,868 

4,585,189 

2,857,683 

3,760,366 

2,558,848 

3,383,231 

136,481 

108,323 

10,885 

9,332 

384 

33,430 

358,568 

346,141 

12,427 

399,042 

336,430 

62,612 

155,403 

128,831 

29,280 

22,020 

369 

41,232 

566,246 

505,815 

60,431 

545,317 

464,176 

81,141 

239,230 

264,544 

8,095 

10,235 

231,135 
 (442,655) 

254,309 
(551,284) 

(2017/2016) 
4=3/2x100 

134.39% 

131.59% 

132.22% 

113.86% 

118.93% 

268.99% 

235.96% 

96.09% 

123.34% 

157.92% 

146.13% 

486.29% 

136.66% 

137.97% 

129.59% 

110.58% 

126.44% 

110.03% 
124.54% 

The table below shows the revenue weight in different business segments: 

Description 

2015 

2016 

2017 

and  delivery 

Gas  production 
activity 
UGS activity 
Electricity  generation and delivery 
activity 
Other activities 
Settlement between branches 
TOTAL Revenue 

RON 
mil 
3,511.4 

332.6 
443.2 

254.7 
-489.2 
4,052.7 

% R 

86.64 

8.21 
10.94 

RON 
mil 
2,857.7 

358.6 
399.0 

% R 

83.76 

10.51 
11.69 

RON 
mil 
3,760.4 

566.2 
545.3 

% R 

82.01 

12.35 
11.89 

6.28 
-12.07 
100.00 

239.2 
-442.7 
3,411.9 

7.01 
-12.98 
100.00 

264.5 
-551.3 
4,585.2 

5.77 
-12.02 
100.00 

Page 31 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The financial income is higher by 2.14% than the one recorded in the previous year. Financial 
income consists mainly of interests on bank deposits and of interest on state bonds.  

Description 

Year 2016                  

Year 2017                           

Ratio           

(RON thousand) 
2 

(RON thousand) 
3 

2,516,978 

19,097 

2,536,075 

2,584,314 

20,541 

2,604,855 

(2017/2016) 
4=3/2x100 
102.68% 

107.56% 

102.71% 

1 

Operating expenses 

Financial expenses 

Total expenses 

Financial Expenses  

Financial expenses during 2017 are higher by 7.56% as compared to the previous year due to 
the negative differences of the exchange rate.  

Chapter  7  shows  more  details  on  the  different  categories  and  a  comparative  assessment 
thereof. 

Compared financial results are shown in the table below (RON thousand):  

Description 

2016 

2017 

1 

Operating results 

Financial results 

Gross result 

Income tax 

Net Result 

2 
1,277,145 

3,550 

1,280,695 

(256,116) 

1,024,579 

Ratio        
(2017/2016) 
4=3/2x100 
170.58% 

3 
2,178,600 

2,591 

72.99% 

2,181,191 

(326,443) 

1,854,748 

170.31% 

127.46% 

181.03% 

Gross  result  during  January  –  December  2017  in  amount  of  RON  2,181,191  thousand  is 
higher than the gross result of the similar period of 2016 by 70.31%.  

The  2017  financial  result  is  below  the  2016  one,  due  to  the  higher  increase  in  financial 
expenses than the increase in financial income.  

  of  the  company  is  also  emphasized  by  the  evolution  of  indicators 

presented in the table below:  

Indicators 

1 
Working capital (WC) 

Working capital requirements (WCR) 

Net cash 

Economic Rate of Return (ERR) 
Return on Equity 

Pg/Cltx100 
Pn/Ex100 

M.U. 

2016 

2017 

Calculation 
Formula 

2 

Clt-Af =         
E+Lnc+Pr+Si-Af 

(Ast-L+Pp) -               
(Lcrt-Crst+Idf) 
WC-WCR = L-Crst 

3 
RON 
mil 
RON 
mil 
Ron 
thousand 
% 
% 

4 

3,772 

5 
3,384 

3,492 

3,157 

281 

227 

12.77 
10.59 

22.46 
19.92 

Page 32 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Return on Sales 
Return on Assets 
EBIT 

EBITDA 

ROCE 
Asset Solvency 

where: 

Pg/Rx100 

Pn/Ax100 
Pg+Exi-Ir 

EBIT+Am 

EBIT/Cempx100 
E/Lx100 

% 

% 
RON 
thousand 
RON 
thousand 
% 
% 

37.54 

9.33 
1,259 

47.57 

17.09 
2,159 

1,570 

2,708 

12.55 
88.15 

22.23 
85.80 

Clt 
Af 
E 
Lnc 
Pr 
Si 
Ast 
L 
Pp 
Lcrt 
Crst 

long-term capital; 
non-current assets; 
equity;  
non-current liabilities;  
provisions; 
investment subsidies;   
short term assets;  
liquidity position;  
Prepayments;   
current liabilities;  
short-term credit; 

Idf 
Pg 
Pn 
R 
A 
Exi 
Ir 
Am 
Cemp 
Acrt 
L 

deferred income 
gross profit; 
net profit; 
revenue; 
total assets; 
interest expense; 
interest income 
amortization and impairment; 
capital employed (total assets–current liabilities); 
current assets 
total liabilities 

The regulatory framework for natural gas production, transmission, distribution, supply and 
storage,  organization  and  operation  of  the  gas  sector,  market  access  as  well  as  criteria  and 
procedures for granting authorizations and/or licenses in the natural gas sector are set by Law 
No  123/2012,  which  provides  in  Chapter  XII  “Prices  and  Tariffs”,  Article  179  for  the 
following: 
  activities in the regulated market comprise the following: 

o  supply  of  natural  gas  to  non-household  customers  at  regulated  price  and  under 
frame contracts until December 31, 2014. On January 1, 2015 regulated prices for 
non-household customers were eliminated. 

o  supply of natural  gas to  household  customers at  regulated price and under frame 
contracts  until  June  30,  2021.  To  ensure  non-discrimination  between    customer 
categories until the end of the regulated period, the household consumers and the 
thermal energy producers receive the same treatment in terms of security of supply 
and  sale  price  of  consumed  gas,  exclusively  for  the  gas  quantities  used  for 
producing  thermal  energy  in  cogeneration  plants  and  thermal  power  plants 
intended for household consumption, irrespective of their option to be eligible or 
regulated customers ; 

o  supply of last resort of natural gas;  

o  natural gas transmission; 

o  natural gas transmission through upstream supply pipelines, in accordance with the 

provisions of license validity conditions; 

o  underground gas storage; 

Page 33 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

o  natural gas storage in pipelines; 

o  natural gas, bio-gas and bio-methane distribution; 

o  related activities performed by licensed operators; 

o  activities related to LNG terminal operation;  

  prices  and  tariffs  on  the  regulated  market  are  set  by  ANRE,  based  on  methodologies 
approved  and  published  by  the  authority  after  informing  and  consulting  all  parties 
concerned;  

  the  calendar  for  gradual  deregulation  of  prices  for  the  final  customers  is  set  by  the 
Government  in  compliance  with  the  schedule  of  producer  price  progress  proposed  by 
ANRE and ANRM, taking into account possible adverse effects of price deregulation, in 
order to mitigate the consequences for customers; 

  ANRE will annually monitor the results of the gradual price deregulation calendar and, as 
the case may be, submit to the Government the proposal to trade domestic gas production 
on the domestic market until fulfilment of the approved calendar, i.e. June 30, 2021.  

Romgaz  operates  both  on  the  regulated  market,  performing  underground  gas  storage  and 
distribution activities, and the free market, performing gas production and supply activities. 

Underground Gas Storage (UGS) 

The  revenues  from  the  underground  storage  business  and  the  storage  tariffs  are  regulated 
since April 1, 2004, by ANRGN Decision No. 1078/2003, abrogated by ANRE Order No. 22 
of May 25, 2012 on approval of the Methodology for approving prices and setting regulated 
tariffs in the gas sector, published in the Official Gazette of Romania No. 379 of June 6, 2012.    

ANRE Order No. 26 of April 26, 2013 approved the regulated revenue for the first year of the 
third regulatory period (April 2012 – March 2013), the regulated revenue for the second year 
of  the  regulatory  period  (April  2013  –  March  2014)  and  the  regulated  tariffs  for  the  period 
April 2013 – March 2014.   

ANRE Order No. 29 of April 9, 2014 approved the regulated revenue for the third year of the 
regulatory  period  (April  2014  –  March  2015)  and  the  regulated  tariffs  for  the  period  April 
2014 – March 2015.  

ANRE Order No. 58 of March 27, 2015 approved the regulated revenue for the fourth year of 
the regulatory period (April 2015 – March 2016) and the regulated tariffs for the period April 
2015 – March 2016.   

Order No.9 of March 23, 2016 extended the application of Order No. 58/2015 ”until the end 
of the underground natural gas storage cycle 2016  - 2017” and Order No. 19/2017 ”until the 
end of the underground natural gas storage cycle 2017 – 2018”.  

Therefore, the storage tariffs applied between January 2014 – December 2017 are as follows: 

Page 34 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

1)  Tariffs approved by Order No. 26/2013 are as follows:  

Tariff Component 

Volumetric component for gas 
injection 
Fixed component for capacity 
reservation  
Volumetric component for gas 
withdrawal 

M.U. 

RON/MWh 

RON/MWh/full storage 
cycle 

RON/MWh 

2) Tariffs approved by Order 29/2014 are as follows: 

Tariff Component 

Volumetric component for gas 
injection 
Fixed component for capacity 
reservation  
Volumetric component for gas 
withdrawal 

M.U. 

RON/MWh 

RON/MWh/full storage 
cycle 

RON/MWh 

Value 

2.37 

13.12 

1.80 

Value 

2.53 

13.14 

1.80 

3) Tariffs approved by Order 58/2015, extended by Order No. 9/2016, respectively Order No. 
19/2017, applicable until March 2018: 

Tariff Component 

Volumetric component for gas 
injection 
Fixed component for capacity 
reservation 
Volumetric component for gas 
withdrawal 

Natural Gas Supply  

M.U. 

RON/MWh 

RON/MWh/full storage 
cycle 

Value 

2.37 

13.68 

RON/MWh 

1.87 

The final gas price for the customer is the sum of the weighted average gas acquisition price, 
the tariffs of transmission, storage and distribution, and the trading component, according to 
the following formula: 

Final  price  =  Weighted  average  price  of  gas  acquisition  +  Transmission  tariff  +  Storage 
tariff + Distribution tariff + Trading component 

The  distribution  tariffs  depend  on  the  distribution  area  and  on  the  distribution  system 
operator.  Regulated  prices  and  tariffs  are  calculated  by  the  “revenue-cap”  method  for 
underground  storage  and  gas  transmission  and  by  the  “price-cap”  method  for  regulated 
distribution and supply. 

According to the provisions of Article 181, paragraph (5) of Law No. 123/2012, the domestic 
gas acquisition price on the regulated market is set by Government Decision, at the proposal 
of  the  competent  ministry,  and  is  updated  by  ANRE  and  ANRM,  in  accordance  with  the 
provisions of the Calendar for gradual deregulation of prices for the final customers. 

The Romanian authorities agreed with the international financial bodies a calendar for gradual 
deregulation of prices until December 31, 2014 for the final non-household customers (except 
when  on  such  date  there  is  a  significant  difference  between  the  trading  price  of  domestic 
production and the European import price that may jeopardize the market stability, then the 
term  would  be  extended  until  December  31,  2015);  for  household  customers  the  term  of 

Page 35 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

completion  of  the  above  mentioned  process  is  December  31,  2018.  The  Romanian 
Government  signed  with  IMF,  the  World  Bank  and  the  European  Commission  a 
“Memorandum  on  the  Calendar  for  Gradual  Deregulation  of  Gas  Prices”.  This  calendar  for 
price increase until the end of 2014 was approved by Government Decision No.22 of January 
22,  2013  on  setting  the  acquisition  price  of  gas  from  domestic  production  on  the  regulated 
gas market.  

At the same time, according to Article 124, paragraph (1), letter e) of Law 123/2012, the gas 
producer  has  to  make  available  gas  quantities  from  their  own  production  to  suppliers,  with 
precedence,  to  cover  the  regulated  market,  in  accordance  with  the  ANRE  regulations  on 
compliance  with  the  price  deregulation  calendar,  and  to  secure  gas  supply  to  the  captive 
consumers, while suppliers have to keep the destination of such gas quantities. The remaining 
domestic production, less the gas quantity necessary for technological consumption, shall be 
made available to the competitive market.  

Domestic  gas  production  allocated  to  final  customers  on  the  regulated  market  comprises 
current gas production and a part of stored gas. 

The table below shows the gas supply average prices in the period 2015-2017: 

Description 
1 

Average supply price for internal gas 
production4 

Average price for import gas 

M.U. 
2 
RON/1000 m3 

RON/MWh 
RON/1000 m3 

2015 
3 
717.80 

68.27 

2016 
4 
698.30 

66.36 

1,928.72 

1,597.47 

RON/MWh 

184.06 

105.74 

2017 
5 
695.74 

66.33 

898.27 

83.81 

Natural Gas Distribution 

Distribution  tariffs  and  final  regulated  prices  valid  during  the  period  analysed  have  been 
approved by ANRE Orders, as follows:   

  ANRE Order No.120/2014 on setting regulated tariffs for gas distribution services and 
approval of prices for regulated gas supply performed by Societatea Natională de Gaze 
Naturale  "ROMGAZ"  -  S.A.  Medias  (for  the  period  December  1,  2014  –  June  30, 
2015); 

  ANRE  Order  No.  57/2015  on  modification  of  ANRE  Order  no.  120/2014  on  setting 
regulated tariffs for gas distribution services and approval of prices for regulated gas 
supply  performed  by  Societatea  Natională  de  Gaze  Naturale  "ROMGAZ"  -  S.A. 
Medias, (as of July 1, 2015); 

  ANRE Order No. 58/2016 on setting regulated tariffs for gas distribution service and 
approval of prices for regulated gas supply performed by Societatea Nationala de Gaze 
Naturale "ROMGAZ" - S.A. Medias (as of October 1, 2016). 

  ANRE Order No. 89/2017 on setting the regulated tariffs for gas distribution services 
and approval of prices for regulated gas supply performed by Societatea Naţională de 
Gaze Naturale "ROMGAZ" - S.A. Medias (as of October 1, 2017). 

The applied tariffs and prices are presented in the table below: 

Description 

December 
1, 2014 – 
June 30, 
2015  

July 1, 
2015-
Septembe
r 30, 2016 

October 1, 
2016-
Septembe
r 30, 2017 

October 1, 
2017-
present 

4 Including gas commodity and gas from association with Schlumberger and without storage services costs 

Page 36 of 94 

 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Distribution tariffs (RON/MWh): 
   *B1 consumption up to 23.25 MWh 
   *B1  annual  consumption  between  23.26  and  116.28 
MWh 
   *B1  annual  consumption  between  116.29  and  1,116.78 
MWh 
   *B1  annual  consumption  between  1,116.79  and 
11,627.78 MWh 

Final regulated prices (RON/MWH): 
   *B1 consumption up to 23.25 MWh 
   *B1  annual  consumption  between  23.26  and  116.28 
MWh 

44.01 
40.06 

44.01 
40.06 
44.01 

52.48 
47.71 
46.81 

52.70 
47.91 
47.01 

40.06 

45.77 

46.21 

120.67 
116.03 

117.75 
113.13 

123.27 
118.49 

119.10 
114.31 

On December 31, 2017 the company had 6,198 employees.  

The evolution of the company’s number of employees between January 1, 2015 – December 
31, 2017 is shown in the table below: 

Description 
1 

Employees at the beginning of the year 

Newly hired employees 

Employees who terminated their labour relationship with the 
company 

2015 
2 
6,344 

159 

147 

2016 
3 
6,356 

168 

278 

2017 
4 

6,246 

233 

281 

Employees at the end of the year 

6,356 

6,246 

6,198 

The structure of employees at the end of 2017 was the following: 

a) by level of education 
  University 
  Secondary education   
  Foreman education 
  Vocational school 
  Middle school  

b) by age 
 
 
 
 
 

under 30 years  
30-40 years 
40-50 years 
50-60 years 
over 60 years   

c) by activities  

 
 
 
 
 
 

gas production  
production tests/well special operations 
health   
transportation   
gas storage 
electricity production   

23.81 % 
27.35 % 
  3.45 % 
33.77 % 
11.62 % 

  4.23 % 
15.38 % 
37.92 % 
33.70 % 
  8.78 % 

62.86 % 
11.52 % 
  1.24 % 
  8.79 % 
  8.47 % 
  7.12 %. 

Page 37 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Distribution  of  Romgaz  employees  by  headquarters  and  by  branches  is  shown  in  the  figure 
below:  

STTM
9%

SIRCOSS
11%

Iernut Branch
7%

Headquarters
7%

Medias Branch
31%

Ploiesti Branch
8%

Targu Mures 
Branch
27%

The structure of the company’s employees from the headquarters and from branches is shown 
in the table below:  

Entity 

Workers 

Foremen 

1 
Headquarters 

Mediaş Branch 

Targu-Mures Branch 

Ploiesti Branch 

SIRCOSS 

STTM 

Iernut Branch 

TOTAL 

2 

3 

31 

1,479 

1,319 

336 

512 

418 

293 

88 

52 

32 

52 

18 

41 

Admin 
Employees 
4 

387 

340 

277 

157 

150 

109 

107 

Total 

5 

418 

1,907 

1,648 

525 

714 

545 

441 

4,388 

283 

1,527 

6,198 

The main areas of training during 2017 were the increase of competitiveness and professional 
performance by improving the professional training.  

Thus, the following were taken into account:  

  training of administrative employees in various areas of activity, in cooperation with 

training suppliers from the country and abroad;   

  authorization/re-authorization, according to specialization and work; 

  skills  improvement  and  vocational  training  of  workers  through  internal  training 

courses.   

A  number  of  2024  employees  were  trained  during  2017  and  the  costs  of  such  professional 
training and skills improvement training courses were of RON 1,357,409. 

The annual training program was implemented as follows:  

Page 38 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  782 persons participated in  professional  training programs  with  professional  subjects 

applicable to their activity; 

  807 persons participated in training courses to obtain authorization/re-authorization in 

accordance with their specialization and work place;   

  373 persons participated in internal training courses;  

  62 persons participated in qualification courses at work place.    

During  2017, the professional training  activity  focused mainly on sustaining the increase of 
adaptability to new economy requirements based on knowledge, in order to ensure and update 
the  required  competencies  for  employees  working  in  the  technical,  economic  and  research-
development field, such as: 

  For the purpose of a more efficient use of the seismic data, which is important to elaborate 
production rehabilitation projects and resources and reserves evaluation studies , a training 
program was carried out for 14 geologists;   

  Certification of technical competencies for oil and gas drilling  for 3 persons, experts and 

professionals, who attended IWCF certification courses at U.P.G. Ploiesti;  

  Implementation  of  the  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  required  training  and 
skills  improvement  of  employees  in  the  economic  and  financial  field.  Therefore,  31 
employees participates in such training courses in 2017;   

  To comply with the legislation in force and to offer the employees practical information 
related  to  applicable  legislation  in  this  field,  16  employees  participated  in  a  course  with 
the theme “VAT Split Payment approached from a practical perspective”; 

  Romgaz  is  involved  in  2  projects  with  a  grant  from  the  European  Union,  as  follows: 
development  of  underground  gas  storage  and  research  and  development  of  a  new 
compatible software frame 5G, specially adapted to the energy field. Thus, to increase the 
chance  of  success  in  obtaining  the  funds,  19  employees  participated  in  training  courses 
according to Romgaz requirements, to elaborate the application “project management and 
financial reporting”; 

  To  implement  “the  Development  Project  of  CTE  Iernut  by  the  construction  of  a  new 
combined cycle power plant with gas turbines”, the implementation team of this project, 
namely  18  employees,  participated  in  a  course  in  the  field  of  “energy  projects 
management”;   

  The  major  legislation  changes  in  the  field  of  sectorial  procurement  required  a  training 
course  for  the  employees  that  coordinate  the  sectorial  procurement  activity  of  the 
company.  Thus,  21  employees  participated  in  a  course  that  included  mainly  a  practical 
component in order to practice the direct use of SEAP competencies;    

  For  the  employees  with  no  economy  studies,  but  who  by  their  activity  have 
responsibilities  which  imply  a  minimum  level  of  knowledge  in  the  economic  field,  a 
program was carried out presenting the basic principles and the current terms used in the 
financial reporting;  

  For  the  purpose  of  developing,  reorganization  and  consolidation  of  the  company,  8 
persons with top management positions participated in  a program carried out in 4 course 
modules, thus acquiring the necessary professional instruments and methods to control the 
objectives, activities and actions of the subordinated employees;   

  In  the  field  of  human  resources,  the  heads  of  the  human  resources  offices,  but  also 
employees  within  these  offices,  participated  in  distinct  training  programs  to  develop  the 

Page 39 of 94 

 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

competencies  in  the  human  resources  administration,  the  performance  management,  the 
human resources analysis, the personnel recruiting and selection;  

  To comply with the legislation in the field of occupational safety and health and to obtain 
the necessary  information to  exercise the position as  a member in  the OSHC, a training 
program  was  carried  out  where  the  members  of  the  occupational  safety  and  health 
committees participated in;   

  As  a  consequence  of  the  legislative  changes  on  the  waste  regime  and  the  several 
obligations  which  Romgaz  must  comply  with,  37  employees  participated  in  a  training 
program in the field of waste management, including hazardous waste.    

Within Romgaz there are two trade unions, as follows:  

   “Sindicatul Liber din cadrul S.N.G.N. Romgaz S.A.”, consisting of 6158 members; 

  “Sindicatul Extracţie Gaze şi Servicii”, consisting of 16 members.  

Thus, the total number of union members is 6174 as compared to 6198 representing the total 
number of employees. The union members/total number of employees ratio is 99.61%. 

Relationship  between  manager  and  employees:  following  negotiations,  the  parties  have 
agreed to conclude a Collective Labour Agreement, valid for 2017 and 2018. 

During 2017, there were three conflicts between the management and the trade union, out 
of which two were in progress on December 31, 2017 (see Annex 2  – Litigations: Items 70 
and 84) and one was completed during 2017.  

In  2017,  the  environment  protection  activity  continued  to  focus  on  compliance  of  Romgaz 
activities with the applicable legal requirements on environment protection. Another aim was 
meeting specific objectives related to: 

  Increase of awareness regarding compliance with legal requirements;  

  Pursuing the accomplishment of all reports imposed by the environment legislation in 
force, by centralizing the information required and reported by Romgaz Branches and 
submitted to public authorities; 

  Rendering  efficiency  to  environment  protection,  a  support  for  Romgaz  management 

process.  

The environment protection activities during 2017 focused on: 

  Fulfilling the requirements deriving from the ISO: 14001 and ISO: 9001 standards; 

  Complying with permitting requirements: 

  Complying  with  legal  requirements  relating  to  environment  permits  for  all  141 
units.  In  this  respect,  the  conformity  degree  is  100%.Thus,  for  four  units  the 
company  has  required  and  obtained  the  review  of  the  permits,  for  one  unit 
reauthorisation  was  requested  and  obtained,  and  one  new  unit  was  given  permit, 
that  is  “Gas  compression  and  dehydration  installation  afferent  to  Sarmasel 
underground  gas  storage”.  Considering  that  for  one  unit  the  regulation  document 
set  a  conformity  plan  –  measures  to  reduce  the  current  and  future  effects  of  the 
activity,  the  company  pursued  to  accomplishment  the  completion  of  a  well  with 
safety  equipment  (packer  and  TRSV  safety  valve).  The  completion  date  of  the 

Page 40 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

investment  was  December  31,  2017,  self-financed,  the  conformity  inspection  was 
carried  out  by  the  Environmental  Guard  –  Mures  County  Commissoner’s  Office 
and by Mures Environmental Protection Agency;  

  Complying  with  legal  requirements  regarding  waste  water  management  permits, 

for:  

  83 units, for which the conformity degree is 100%  - to be noted that for 11 
units re-authorization permits are in process of being obtaining, for 24 units 
the  re-authorization  permits  were  obtained,  and  for  1  unit  a  new 
authorisation permit was obtained, that is “Reinforced concrete bridge over 
Moldova River, in Frasin, Suceava County”;  

  39 units related to reservoir water systems/injection wells, out of which 2 
are in process of obtaining the re-authorization, 10 units were reauthorized, 
and for 1 new unit the authorization documentation was submitted, that is 
for “Well 283 Roman for reservoir water injection, Roman Section, Neamt 
County”.  

A company-wide application has been developed to monitor environment permits, and to 
permanently  analyse  and  continuously  supervise  compliance  with  legal  requirements  in 
the field of environment protection; 

  Disposal  of  waste  generated  from  own  activity,  according  to  the  legal  requirements  in 
force.  In  2017,  the  company’s  activity  generated  5,312.422  tons  of  waste,  out  of  which 
979.574  tons  were  recycled  and  co-incinerated  (975.207  tons  were  recycled  and  4.367 
tons  were  co-incinerated),  42.623  tons  of  waste  were  disposed  by  incineration  and 
4,290.225 tons of waste were disposed by storage.  

2017 AMOUNT OF GENERATED WASTE (5,312.4 tons)

43

980

4 290

Quantity disposed by incineration

Quantity recycled and co-
incinerated

Quantity disposed by storage

100%

50%

0%

In  2017,  the  “Program  for  Prevention  and  Reduction  of  Waste  Generated  by  S.N.G.N. 
Romagaz  S.A.”  pursued  the  accomplishment  of  the  measures  thereunder.  This  program 
approaches  the  measures  and  methods  of  prevention  and  reduction  of  waste  quantities 
resulting  from  the  company’s  activity,  in  accordance  with  the  applicable  regulations  and  a 
preferential hierarchy of waste management. The Program aims at identifying the objectives, 
targets and policy actions the company is required to comply with in its waste management 
activity in order to fulfil the company’s strategic objectives. 

Page 41 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Romgaz Waste Flow 

Measures and methods were identified in the assessments on waste quantity reduction and 
in the references of the internal audit relating to waste. The priority of waste management 
relates to reduction of waste at source, recycling, valorisation, treatment and last, but not 
least, disposal by incineration or storage. This Program was drafted in accordance with the 
Romgaz  Integrated  Management  Policy  Statement  and  was  endorsed  by  the  National 
Agency for Environment Protection. 
Also,  in  this  case,  Romgaz  developed  an  application  for  waste  management  control, 
whereby  a  permanent  analysis  and  a  continuous  supervision  of  compliance  with  legal 
requirements (waste management in accordance with legal requirements, tracking of waste 
management performed by authorized contractors etc.); 

  Monitoring  the  compliance  with  legal  requirements  on  environment  protection,  by 
monitoring ways to clarify the exceeding of limits permitted by regulations in force. For 
the  entire  company,  permanent  analysis  and  continuous  supervision  are  carried  out  in 
connection  with  the  physical-chemical,  bacteriological  and  biological  indicators  of 
emitted  pollutants,  the  frequency  and  ways  of  using  results.  In  2017,  Romgaz  exceeded 
the  legally  allowed  limits,  with  the  effluents  discharged  into  surface  water  bodies  or 
sewage  networks;  penalties  were  paid  in  this  respect  to  the  National  Agency  “Apele 
Romane” or to the sewer operators, thus:  

  Exceeding  the  limit  values  of  the  CCOCr  indicator,  in  the  technological 
purified  water,  coming  from  Roman  car  wash.  Subsequently,  cleaning 
operations of the oil products separator were performed and the results of the 
analysis  of  water  sample  taken  subsequently  were  complying  with  the 
indicators provided by NTPA 002;  

  Exceeding  the  maximum  admitted  concentration  of  impurities  in  the  waste 
water,  coming  from  Bazna  Spa  Resort;  penalties  were  paid  in  this  respect  to 
the Water Basin Administration - Mures;   

  Exceeding  the  regulated  water  volume,  at  Roman  Natural  Gas  Production 
Section; penalties were paid in this respect to the Water Basin Administration - 
Siret-Bacau;  

  Monitoring the settlement of environment notifications and complaints against Romgaz. 

In 2017, one external environment complaint was recorded, as follows:  

  Notification  regarding  oil  and  water  leaks,  near  the  water  settler  – 
hydrocarbons  separator  pre-cleaning  the  effluents  coming  from  SC  Mures 
platform. Following the field inspections, it was decided that the rain pouring 
down and affecting the Corunca commune around lunch time on July 13, 2017, 

Page 42 of 94 

 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

generated  water  and  mud  discharges  in  the  inspection  chambers  of  Boema 
Complex  (located  in  the  neighbourhood)  as  well  as  water  and  oil  discharges 
from  the  hydrocarbons  separator  pre-cleaning  the  effluents  coming  from  SC 
Mures  platform,  within  the  surrounded  limits  (for  a  small  area).  SC 
AQUASERV,  Targu  Mures  (the  owner  of  the  sewage  network)  was  notified 
regarding  this  incident,  and  it  was  shortly  remedied  in  the  end.  At  the  same 
time, in order to limit the effects of oil discharges from the separator, absorber 
was used;    

investment  (according 

  After extending the scope of business by taking over Iernut thermoelectric power plant, 
the aim was complying with the legal requirements applicable in this field of activity, in 
2017 being monitored a total of 1,024,682 tons of CO2 for burners IMA 1, 4, 5. In Annex 
3  “The  National  Investment  Plan”  of  the  Government  Decision  No.1096/2013  for  the 
approval of provisional free allocation of greenhouse certificates to electricity producers 
during  2013-2020,  Romgaz  is  included  at  line  22  with  the  “Combined  Cycle  Gas 
Turbine” 
the 
amendment  of Government  Decision No.1096/2013 for the approval  of provisional free 
allocation  of  greenhouse  certificates  to  electricity  producers  during  2013-2020,  the 
National  Investment  Plan  included).  According  to  Annex  1  of  the  same  Government 
Decision, Romgaz, as operator, received for CTE Iernut for 2017, a number of 412,322 
greenhouse  certificates  (EUA).  In  2017,  Romgaz  acquired  a  total  number  of  412,322 
greenhouse  certificates.  As  of    December  31,  2017,  Romgaz  held  in  the  account  of  the 
Sole  Register  of  Greenhouse  Gas  Emissions  a  number  of  418,903  CO2  certificates,  as 
follows:  

to  Government  Decision  No.151/2015  for 

o  412,322 greenhouse certificates (EUA), for 2017, acquired in December 2017;  
o  549,763 greenhouse certificates (EUA), for 2016, acquired in December 2016;  
o  140,000  greenhouse  certificates  acquired  from  the  Stock  Exchange,  for  2016 

conformity;  

o  895,835 greenhouse certificates (validated) were submitted in the Sole Register 

of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2016 conformity;  

o  984,053 certificates were used for conformity of 2015 emissions;  
o  687,204 certificates acquired in September 2015, namely the first 2015 tranche 

(50%) and in November 2015, namely the second 2015 tranche (50%);  

o  824,645  certificates  for  2014  were  used  for  partial  conformity  of  2014 

emissions, such as 828,793 tons of CO2; 

o  Of the total of 962,085 certificates acquired for 2013, 507,620 were submitted 
for conformity of 2013 emissions. Therefore, Romgaz used out of the 454,465 
remaining certificates – 4,148 for 2014 conformity, and was left with 450,317 
certificates; 

o  7,587  certificates  submitted  to  the  Register  by  Electrocentrale  Bucuresti  for 
conformity  with  the  January  2013  emissions.  Romgaz  monitored  conformity 
after acquiring CET Iernut, respectively in February 2013; 

Starting  with  2016,  Romgaz  -  CTE  Iernut  lacks  CO2  certificates  necessary  for 
emissions conformity, thus: 

o  In 2016, the electric power plant released 895,835 tons of CO2, the account of 
the Sole Register of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on December 31, 2016 being 
762,416  CO2  certificates.  Thus,  a  shortage  of  133,419  CO2  certificates  is 
registered, necessary for conformity of 2016, which were acquired during Q1 
2017 and no later than April 30, 2017 (the legal term for conformity of 2016 
emissions), from the Stock Exchange, by means of a brokerage firm.     

Page 43 of 94 

 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

o  In 2017, the electric power plant released 1,024,682 tons of CO2, the account 
of  the  Sole  Register  of  Greenhouse  Gas  Emissions  on  December  31,  2017, 
being 418,903 CO2 certificates. Thus, a shortage of 605,779 CO2 certificates is 
registered, necessary for conformity of 2017, which are to be acquired during 
Q1  2018  and  no  later  than  April  30,  2018  (the  legal  term  for  conformity  of 
2017 emissions) from the Stock Exchange, by means of a brokerage firm.    

According  to  Commission  Regulation  (EU)  No.1123/2013  of  November  8,  2013  on 
determining international credit entitlements pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the 
European Parliament and the Council, the Protocol to the United Nations Framework 
Convention on Climate Change (the Kyoto Protocol) establishes two mechanisms for 
the  creation  of  international  credits  that  Parties  may  use  to  offset  emissions.  Joint 
Implementation  (JI)  provides  for  the  creation  of  emission  reduction  units  (ERDs), 
whereas  the  Clean  Development  Mechanism  (CDM)  provides  for  the  creation  of 
certified  emission  reductions  (CRs).  The  industries  the  fall  under  the  European 
emissions  trading  system  to  atmosphere  (EU  ETS)  may  use  these  credits  to 
compensate their obligations as regards the greenhouse gas emissions.    

In this respect, Romgaz acquired as availability of linking (availability of EUA – ERU 
certificates correlation) a number of 51,598 ERU certificates available to be used for 
conformity for 2013 – 2020.     

According to Decision No.1096 of December 17, 2013 for the approval of provisional 
free allocation of greenhouse certificates to electricity producers during 2013-2020, as 
operator, Romgaz received CO2 certificates, as follows:   

Operator 

Instalation 

Annual allocation (tCO2/year) 

SNGN 
Romgaz SA 

SNGN Romgaz 
SA - CTE Iernut 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

2018 

2019 

2020 

962,085  824,645 

687,204  549,763 

412,322  274,882 

137,441 

- 

  based  on  the  recommendations  made  by  the  Due  Diligence  Study,  performed  with  the 
aim of establishing the conformity level of the company to the environmental legislation 
in  force,  identification  of  past  and  present  environmental  issues,  as  well  as  future 
environmental risks the company may face, a Report on Significant Environment Issues 
Remediation  was  prepared  whereby  costs,  solutions  and  implementation  terms  for 
remedy  measures  were  assumed.  In  2017,  Romgaz  monitored  the  implementation  of 
permanent measures and of multiannual implementation terms measures contained in the 
Remediation  Report  (maintaining  the  perchloroethylene  consumption  below  1  ton/year 
for each location so that the provisions of Government Decision no. 699/2003 on setting 
measures  to  reduce  emissions  of  volatile  organic  compounds  due  to  use  of  organic 
solvents  for  specific  activities  and  installations;  requesting  the  renewal  of  environment 
permits  with  45  days  prior  to  the  expiration;  locating  industrial  objectives  at  sufficient 
distance  from  the  protected  receptors;  reducing  fugitive  emissions  in  the  area  of 
calibration tanks, of metal tanks and of concrete tanks for temporary storage of reservoir 
water by equipping the tanks with ecological dispersion systems; periodic payment to the 
“Closing  Fund”  until  the  set  value  of  provision  is  met  for  the  specific  waste  storage  at 
Ogra;  annual  monitoring  frequency  for  Dumbravioara  drilling  waste  storage  closed  in 
2003, etc.); 

  scheduling  and  organizing  the  environmental  internal  inspection,  in  order  to  verify  the 

conformity with legal requirements applicable to inspected activities.   

In  2017,  50  environmental  internal  inspections  were  scheduled  and  performed  (from 
Romgaz headquarters on authorized units of the branches), further to which 3 Reports of 
Determined Nonconformity were made, out of which 2 were closed within assumed time 

Page 44 of 94 

 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

limit,  1  open  (within  assumed  time  limit).  Also,  Romgaz  branches  scheduled  and 
performed  129  environmental  internal  inspections  further  to  which  3  Reports  of 
Determined Nonconformity were made, which were closed within the time limit;     

  assessment of conformity level to environmental protection requirements and contractual 
requirements of contractors and sub-contractors of drilling works contracted by Romgaz 
in 2017; 

  implementation of the 2017 action/measure programs for prevention and/or minimization 

impact on the environment, that were implemented as follows: 

landslide fighting; 

installing waste water discharge installations;  
installing glass fiber tanks;  

installing waste water collection tanks;  
transforming abandoned wells into reservoir water injection wells;  
installing concrete mud tanks; 

 
  modernization of  reservoir water storage tanks;  
 
 
 
  construction of wells monitoring the injection wells;   
 
 
  making payments for environment protection and permitting;  
  environment protection works required for well modernization;  
  environment protection works for access roads and well sites construction;  
  electricity supply works;  
  well recompletion works;  
 
  environment protection works for new wells drilling;  
  maintenance and repair works at waste water treatment plants; 
  expenses in connection with transportation, takeover and disposal of hazardous 

installing non-polluting discharge systems;  

and non-hazardous waste; 

  expenses in connection with laboratory analyses; 
  CO2 validation report fee; 
  Expenditures arising from monitoring the ichthyofauna of Mures River;   
  Expenditures with brokerage services;  
  Equivalent value of CO2 certificates.    

In 2017, the Environmental Guard and the Water Basin Administrations made 64 inspections 
at Romgaz locations. Following such inspections, Romgaz was not sanctioned/fined.  

In 2017, Romgaz did not record any environmental accident. 

During  2017,  the  competent  state  institutions,  namely  the  Territorial  Labour  Inspectorates, 
made  8  inspections  and  the  Public  Health  District  Authorities  made  2  inspections.  No 
deficiencies were noted.   

Individual  protection  equipment  was  acquired,  based  on  the  framework  agreements  and 
subsequent contracts, for all the employees of the company.  

Page 45 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Also,  a  number  of  4,040  influenza  vaccine  doses  were  acquired,  in  accordance  with  the 
demand of the branches/headquarters. 

According  to  the  Collective  Labour  Contract,  voluntary  health  insurance  services  were 
acquired, of supplementary type, for all the employees.  

The summarized breakdown of litigations is the following:  

  150 litigations, out of which:  

  83 cases where Romgaz is complainant;  

  30 cases where Romgaz is defendant; 

  15 cases where Romgaz is plaintiff claiming damages/injured party; 

  The  (approximately)  total  value  of  the  files  where  Romgaz  is  plaintiff  is  RON 

2,032,928,217.97; 

  The  (approximately)  total  value  of  the  files  where  Romgaz  is  defendant  is  RON 

9,033,831.51 and EUR 60,000. 

The detailed list of litigations is shown in Annex 2 of this Report.  

Page 46 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The occurrence and thereafter the development and gradual diversification of what was truly 
going to be the Romanian natural gas infrastructure has an important benchmark, year 1909, 
when the first gas reservoir was discovered by drilling well 2 Sarmasel (Mures county).  

During the immediately following years, a gas infrastructure unique in Europe for those times 
started to outline at a reduced scale, consisting of the following assets: 

  gas  transmission  pipeline,  the  first  of  this  kind  in  Europe,  build  in  1914, 

connecting  towns Sarmasel and Turda (Cluj county) and 

  gas compressor station from Sarmasel; build in 1927- the first one in Europe. 

It is notable that the country’s large gas structures were discovered after 1960 and in parallel, 
a complex infrastructure started to be developed at national scale dedicated exclusively to the 
gas extraction process and later to the injection and underground storage process. These large 
gas  structures  located  in  the  Transylvanian  basin  supply  even  today  considerable  gas 
quantities. 

The infrastructure related to field production and to gas storage in depleted fields turned into 
underground storages, looks today as a particularly complex system. 

As a whole, the infrastructure of the company developed continuously before and after 1989. 
The development of the production capacities reached the peak during 1970–1980 when the 
annual  production  was  extremely  high,  both  due  to  the  consumption  demand  and  to  the 
considerable reservoir energy of most of the discovered gas fields. 

Part  of  the  company’s  production  infrastructure  (assets)  resulted  from  the  nationalisation  of 
June 1948.  

Currently, no natural or legal person, from the country or from abroad, claimed any asset of 
Romgaz. 

Although  operational,  most  of  the  production  facilities  are  several  decades  old,  therefore,  a 
rehabilitation  and  modernisation  process  started  a  few  years  ago  consisting  of  installing, 
replacing  or  upgrading  gas  delivery/take  over  fiscal  panels,  gas  dehydration  stations,  gas 
compressor stations. 

The production facilities relating to the company’s infrastructure are: 

1.  

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

Gas  wells  (currently  producing  wells,  temporarily  suspended  wells  waiting  for 
reactivation or recompletion operations, wells for reservoir water injection); 

Pipelines  (gathering  pipelines  connecting  the  well  clusters,  waste  water  pipelines, 
industrial water pipelines); 

Gas heaters (radiators); 

Gas separators (underground separators, surface separators); 

Flow metering panels (technological flow metering panels for almost every gas field,  
fiscal or commercial flow metering panel located at the interface with the NTS); 

Gas dehydration stations (conditioning): 

Gas compression units: 

• 

low capacity portable compressors installed at the well head or at the cluster, 

Page 47 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

• 

• 

booster compressors for one or more fields, 

compressor  stations,  usually  consisting  of  two  or  more  units,  intermediate  or 
final compressor stations (outlet to the NTS); 

8. 

9. 

Industrial or reservoir water pumping stations; 

Other facilities (buildings, workshops, electric lines, well access roads etc.). 

Production facilities are used at their maximum capacity (close to 100%). 

Currently, 154 gas fields are producing out of which 147 are well defined blocks and the rest 
of 7 are blocks with experimental production.  

Production  from  these  fields  is  made  by  approximately  3240  wells  and  by  almost  the  same 
number of technological surface facilities consisting of flowlines, heaters (where the case may 
be) liquid separators and gas flow metering panels. 

From the total number of wells, 26% of the wells produce at depths over 2,000 m. Pressure 
and flow limits of production wells are operated by 127 compressor units, of which 93 units 
are  grouped  in  20  compressor  stations,  and  17  units  are  the  so-called  booster  compressors, 
located near well clusters.      

One technical demand required by applicable laws is the quality of gas which is fulfilled in 
proportion of 100% by means of 74 gas dehydration stations.  

The  other  component  of  the  company’s  infrastructure,  namely  the  information  –  technical 
system  consists  of  all  information  equipment  and  programs  (software)  used  to  monitor  the 
parameters  related  to  gas  research,  production  and  storage  activities.  These  complex 
information programs consist of a series of modules that process the data received further to 
seismic  surveys  of  the  earth  crust,  collects  information  resulting  from  gas  wells  researches, 
information  related to  production history and other technical  input data for performing  cash 
flow analyses etc. 

Processing  and  interpretation  of  these  input  data  leads  to  preparing  extensive  technic  and 
economic specifications called geological studies. These studies also analyse and substantiate 
the  investments  planned  for  the  field  in  question.  The  investments  together  with  other 
production stimulation works become mandatory once the geological study is approved by the 
ANRM. 

Bilciureşti Storage 

Characteristics: 

  Location: Dâmboviţa County, approximately 40 km V-NV from Bucharest; 
  Commissioned in 1983; 
  Capacity: 

o  Working capacity: 1,310 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 17 million m3/day; 

  Main  fixed  assets:  61  wells,  out  of  which  57  injection/extraction  wells,  3  piezometric 
wells,  1  waste  water 
injection  well,  26  km  of  gathering  pipelines  for  57 
injection/extraction wells, 50 gas heaters, 24 separators, 14 gas metering facilities, 7 gas 
dehydration  stations,  33  km  gathering  pipeline,  3  reservoir  monitoring  parameters 
systems, bi-dimensional fiscal metering system equipped with ultrasonic meter, two-stage 

Page 48 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

compression station (Butimanu) composed of three compression modules and waste water 
injection station.  

Currently, design works  for UGS upgrading  were contracted with  the scope of ensuring the 
quality of the supplied gas quantities through the NTS as well as to increase the withdrawal 
capacity to a maximum of 20 million m3/day. 

Sărmăşel Storage 

Characteristics: 

  Location:  near  Sarmasel,  approximately  35  km  NW  from  Tirgu-Mures,  35  km  north 

from Ludus and 48 km east from Cluj-Napoca.; 

  Commissioned in 1996; 
  Capacity: 

o  Working capacity: 900 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 9.0 million m3/day ; 

  Main fixed assets: 63 wells, 26 km gathering pipeline for 63 wells, 77 separators, 9 km 
collector,  1  reservoir  monitoring  parameters  system,  bi-directional  fiscal  metering 
system equipped with ultrasonic meters, compressor station (Sarmasel)  

In 2016, following investments were commissioned in order to increase the working capacity 
of the storage up to 900 million m3/cycle:  

  A new gas compressor station equipped with 4 compressor units ;  
  3 gas dehydration stations;  
  Upgrading and flexibility of the fiscal metering system;  
  4 injection/extraction wells, including related technological installations;  
  5.5  km  gathering  pipelines,  connection  with  the  new  compressor  station  –  ISM 

measure panel.    

Urziceni Storage  

Characteristics: 

  Location: Ialomita county approximately 50 km NE from Bucharest 
  Commissioned in 1978; 
  Capacity: 

o  Working capacity: 360 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 4.7 million m3/day; 

  Main fixed assets: 20 wells, out of which 31 injection/extraction wells and 1 piezometric 
well,  19.4  km  of  gathering  pipelines  for  31  injection/extraction  wells,  31  gas  heaters,  6 
technological  gas  metering  facilities,  1  gas  dehydration  station,  3.3  km  gathering 
pipelines, 3 reservoir monitoring parameters system, bi-directional fiscal metering system 
equipped  with  ultrasonic  meters,  optic  fibre  data  acquisition  system  and  compressor 
station equipped with 4 compressor units (Urziceni). 

In  2016,  the  following  investments  were  in  progress  in  order  to  ensure  the  supplied  gas 
quality in the NTS as well as to constantly maintain the daily extraction capacity at an average 
of 4 million m3/day:    

  Upgrading gas dehydration station;  
  Upgrading surface infrastructure.  

During 2017, 2 new injection wells were drilled and put into service, works which included 
the related technological installations, too.    

Page 49 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Cetatea de Baltă Storage 

Characteristics: 

  Location: approximately 12 km S-V from Târnăveni; 
  Commissioned in 2002; 
  Capacity: 

o  Working capacity: 100 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 1 million m3/day; 

  Main  fixed  assets:  14  wells,  7  km  gathering  pipelines  for  14  wells,  6  separators,  6 
technological  gas  metering  facilities,  10  km  gathering  pipeline,  field  supervising  system 
and fiber-optic data acquisition system.   

Gherceşti Storage 

  Location: Dolj County, near Craiova;  
  Commissioned in 2002; 
  Capacity: 

o  Working capacity: 150 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 1.5 million m3/day; 

  Main  fixes  assets:  85  wells,  out  of  which  79  injection/extraction  wells,  6  piezometric 
wells,    153  km  gathering  pipelines  for  79  wells,  13  separators,  6  technological  gas 
metering  facilities,  1  gas  dehydration  station,  42  km  gathering  pipeline,  7  reservoir 
monitoring  parameters  systems,  bi-directional  fiscal  metering  system  with  two  metering 
lines,  equipped  with  ultrasonic  meters  and  communication  system  and  fiber-optic  data 
acquisition system. 

Bălăceanca Storage 

Characteristics: 

  Location: approximately 4 km from Bucharest; 
  Commissioned in 1989; 
  Capacities: 

o  Working capacity: 50 million m3; 
o  Delivery capacity: 1.2 million m3/day; 

  Main fixes assets: 24 wells, out of which 21 injection/extraction wells and 3 piezometric 
wells,  10  km  gathering  pipelines,  15  gas  heaters, 4  separators,  4  technological  gas 
metering  facilities,  1  gas  dehydration  station,  1.7  km  gathering  pipeline,  1  reservoir 
monitoring  parameters  system,  bi-directional  fiscal  metering  system  equipped  with 
ultrasonic meters, compressor station (Balaceanca) and communication system and fiber-
optic data acquisition system. 

Well workover, capital repairs and well production tests represent all the services performed 
with workover rigs, as well as equipment for specific support operations such as: cement plug 
drilling installations, mud tank equipped with agitator, sand control-sand blender, DST- cased 
hole testing of productive layers, shale shaker, mud pumps. 

Special  Well  Operations  are  performed  with  the  following  equipment:  cementing  unit, 
slickline,  wireline,  coiled  tubing  unit,  liquid  nitrogen  converter,  liquid  nitrogen  tank  truck, 
cement  container,  filter  unit,  equipment  for  discharge  and  measurement  with  two-phase 

Page 50 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

separation, equipment fir discharge and measurement with three- phase separation, equipment 
for  tubing  investigation,  echometer,  rental  of  tools  and  utilities,  tubing  cutting,  packer 
assembling  device,  hydraulic  packer  recovery  tools,  technical  assistance  for  special  well 
operations, well fire-fighting equipment. 

Future  well  workover  and  special  well  operations  are  required  in  order  to  stop  production 
decline. 

The car fleet of STTM consists of 641 vehicles and machinery and 79 trailers, as follows:  

  Passenger  carriers:  cars  (115),  land  vehicles  (129),  minibuses  (13),  buses  (2)  and  large 

buses (2); 

  passengers and cargo carriers < than 3.5 t (61) and > than 3.5 t (82); 

  vehicles for cargo transportation: dumpers (23), cesspit emptier (41), platform trucks (20), 

tank trucks (3); 

  vehicles for heavy transportation: truck-tractors (3) and semitrailer trucks (11); 

  handling machinery: cranes from 12-18 t (2) and 24-35 t (20); 

  special vehicles: mobile laboratory for equipment testing and checking (1); 

  heavy machinery: bulldozers (8), caterpillar shovels (2), wheel loaders (17), motor grader 

(3), compactor (3), front end loaders (10); 

  other machinery: tractor trucks (70), fork lift trucks, etc.; 

  other vehicles: trailers for heavy transportations, trailers and semitrailers (79). 

STTM  plans  to  ensure  qualitative  and  economically  efficient  services  due  to  the  future 
dynamics of Romgaz core business over the medium term (approximately 5 years).  

CTE Iernut has an installed capacity of 800MW, including 6 power units: 4 Czechoslovakian 
power  units  with  an  installed  capacity  of  100  MW  each  and  2  Soviet  power  units  with  an 
installed  capacity  of  200  MW  each.  The  units  had  been  commissioned  between  1963  and 
1967.  

The power plant is connected to the main road E60 by a 1.5km long road and to the national 
railway system at Cuci by a 2 km railway both owned by the CTE Iernut.  

Operating restrictions imposed by applicable environmental regulations 

The 100 MW Power Units 1 and 4   

During  2013,  by  commissioning  a  fuel  gas  recirculation  system  for  boiler  no.  1,  NOx 
emissions  were  reduced  from  800  mg/Ncm  flue  gas  to  300  mg/Ncm,  complying  therefore 
with environmental regulations.  

In  compliance  with  the  integrated  environmental  authorization  for  CTE  Iernut,  power  units 
no.1  and  4,  with  an  installed  capacity  of  100MW  each,  may  operate  on  a  transition  period 
until June 30, 2020. The maximum NOx emissions must be reduced from 300 to 100 mg/Ncm 
flue gas within this period.  

If this last measure is not taken, the units will not be allowed to operate after June 30, 2020.  

The 100MW Power Units 2 and 3 

Page 51 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Change  of  environment  protection  legislation,  namely,  Directive  CE  2010/75/EU  allow 
limited time of operation for units 2 and 3 in case the emission reduction equipment of one or 
more groups break down and power supply is a priority requirement. Therefore, as of January 
2016, units 2 and 3 shall be put in dry preservation.  

The 200MW power units 5 and 6 

Low  NOx  emission  burners  have  been  installed  in  years  2010  and  2011.  As  such,  an 
environmental  requirement  included  in  the  integrated  environmental  authorization  was 
fulfilled.  

Due to these measures, the power units automatically enter the new transition period during 
January 01, 2016 - December 31, 2020.  

Investments play an important part in arresting the production decline, which is achieved by 
discovering  of  new  reserves,  by  improvement  of  the  current  recovery  rate,  and  by 
rehabilitation, development and modernization of existing facilities.  

 The company invested during 2013 – 2017 approximately RON 4.15 billion, as follows: 

Year 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

Total 

Amount 
thousand) 

(RON 

848,247 

1,085,497 

937,916 

497,716 

781,768 

4,151,144 

For 2017, Romgaz schelduled investments worth RON 1,143 million and invested RON 781.8 
million, with 31.6% less than scheduled. As compared to 2016, the investments increased by 
RON 284 million. The company financed all investments from own sources, and a part of the 
investments related to CTE Iernut shall be refunded by the National Investment Plan.  

The value of fixed assets commissioned during the reporting period was of RON 392 million.  

By  G.M.S.  Resolution  No.1  of  April  25,  2017,  the  Director  General  approved  the  2016 
investment  program  and  the  relating  budget,  as  Annex  4  to  the  income  and  expenditures 
budget.  

Major investments target in general projects such as: 

  continuing  geological  research  works  by  performing  surveys  and  drillings  for  the 

discovery of new gas reserves; 

  production development by adding new facilities on existing structures; 
 

improving  the  performance  of  facilities  and  equipment  and  increasing  production 
safety; 
increase  of  underground  storage  capacities,  flexibility  and  security  of  the  existing 
storages; 

 

The  table  below  shows  the  investments  made  in  2017,  as  compared  to  those  scheduled  and 
accomplished in 2016:  

Investment chapter 

Ite
m 
No. 
0 
1. 
1.1  Natural gas exploration, production works 

1 
Investments in progress – total, out of which: 

2016 

2017 

*RON thousand* 
%       

Schedule 

Result 

’17/’16 

2 
238,433 
178,285 

3 
442,692 
438,510 

4 
320,056 
316,719 

5=4/2x100 
134.23 
177.65 

Page 52 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

1.2  Maintaining UGS capacity 

59,953 

3,000 

2,281 

3.8 

1.3  Environment protection works 

2.  New investment – total, out of which: 

2.1  Natural gas exploration, production works 
2.2  Maintaining UGS capacity 
2.3  Environment protection works 

3. 
4. 

Investment in existing tangible assets 
Equipment  (other  acquisition  of  tangible 
assets) 

5.  Other investment (studies, licenses, software, 

financial assets etc.) 

195 
21,316 

19,995 
1,287 
34 
200,983 
31,838 

1,182 
365,884 

354,764 
8,000 
3,120 
250,173 
66,394 

1,056 

541.54 
230,409  1,080.92 

7,480 

221,980  1,110.18 
581.19 
949  2,791.17 
92.66 
134.23 

186,234 
42,735 

5,146 

17,857 

2,334 

43.35 

* 

TOTAL 

497,716 

1,143,000 

781,768 

157.07 

The chart below shows the investments for 2017:  

23,82%

1,25%

5,47%

I. Exploration Works, Exploitation

0,26%

0,30%

II. Investments in current tangible assets
(developments and modernizations)

III. Maintaining UGS capacity

IV. Independent equipment and installations

V. Environement protection works

VI. Expenses in connection with studies and
projects

68,91%

The summary of the achieved investment projects is shown below: 

Main Projects 

Planned 2017 

Achieved 2017 

Item 
No. 
1. 

  Drilling, exploration 

2. 

  Surface exploration works 

38 wells 

2D Seismic – 200 km 
3D Seismic – 1.200 km2 

3. 
4. 

5. 

  Production drilling 
  Surface facilities – gas wells 

3 wells 
31 wells 

  Compressor stations and gas 
dehydration stations in gas 
fields 

Dehydration station Galbenu II 

24 completed wells  
2 wells in progress 
2D Seismic – 200 km 
3D Seismic – 1.200 
km2 
2 completed wells  
8 completed wells 
8 wells in progress 
completed 

6. 

  Maintaining storage capacity 

• 
• 

• 

7. 

  Well recompletion 

  Well capitalized repair 

8. 

9. 

Sărmăşel Storage: 
 - auxiliary drilling services 
Urziceni Storage 
- injection/extraction system 
- drilling 2 wells  
102 wells, correlated with the annual 
program agreed by ANRM  
140 wells 

completed 

completed 
completed 
188 wells 

150 wells 

  Electricity production 

Execution and performance of design 

In progress 

Page 53 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

10.    Partnerships/Associations 

11.    Studies 

service contract CTE Iernut, 
completion term 2020  
Aurelian Petroleum – currently 
Raffles (Brodina): 
- re-testing Voitinel 1 well 
Lukoil: 
- geological and geophysical data 
interpretation 
- geological and geophysical data 
analysis and assessment of reservoir 
data  
- upgrading the geological model of 
LIRA  
- integrate analysis of geophysical 
and geological data   
- identifying new prospects  
- TT&T 
Amromco: 
- seismic acquisition for 1 block 
- drilling 3 wells; 
- recompletion operations for 8 wells 
- surface facilities for 3 wells and 
increase of compressor capacity for  
Bibeşti drying station 
Slovacia: 
- drilling 3 wells in Blocks Svidnik, 
Snina and Medzilaborce 
Reservoir studies 

completed 

completed 

completed 

completed 

completed 

completed 
partially completed 

completed 
completed 
completed 
completed 

incompleted 

100% 

A  very  important  objective  is  “Developing  CTE  Iernut  by  the  construction  of  a  new 
powerplant, with combined cycle gas turbine” with deadline for completion in Q1 2020. 

In 2017, the Construction Authorization/Permit  was obtained and the following works were 
performed:  

  Land clearing/development by buildings demolition;   

  Approach and marginal road development; 

  Storage platform development (site management);  

  Construction works for foundations began.  

One  very  complex  issue  largely  impacting  the  implementation  of  the  investment  plan  is 
found  in  the  investment  preparation  phase  and  consists  of  obtaining  land  permits, 
approvals, agreements and authorizations required for the performance of works and in the 
procurement phase.  

The level of results was negatively influenced by causes specific for both phases: 

- 

- 

 Difficult to perform the drilling activity regarding access to public roads;  

Impossibility  to  obtain  lands  and  implicitly,  approvals  and  construction  permits  for 
surface facilities and gas collectors;     

-  Delays  when  performing  the  3D  seismic  survey  works  generated  by  the  difficulties  in 
obtaining  the  approvals  and  agreements  as  well  as  the  acceptance  of  the  land  owners  to 
enter in the above-mentioned blocks;  

Page 54 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

-  Repeat procedures for procurement of drilling works for 2 wells for which the bidder did 

not have the available drilling installations;  

-  Long time interval  to obtain the approvals and agreements issued by water, environment, 
property  register,  agricultural  related  bodies,  with  direct  effects  upon  issuance  of  the 
construction authorization for the execution of surface facilities;  

-  Delays  in  the  public  procurement  processes  due  to  repeated  dismissals  by  ANAP  of 

certain award documentations (I.T. Prahova and Ialomița lots). 

The work completion degree in relation to the work programs for each partnership is indicated 
below (RON million): 

Ite
m 
no. 
1 

2 

3 

4 

* 

Partnership/Association 

       2017 
Schedule 

              2017 
              Results 

Results/ 
Schedule 

Romgaz, Alpine Oil&Gas and JKX  Oil&Gas 
- Slovacia 

Romgaz and Aurelian (currently Raffles) 

Romgaz and Amromco 

Romgaz, Lukoil and PanAtlantic 

Total work program 

8,643.00 

780.83 

9.03% 

1,118.88 

24,890.46 

3,912.00 

38,564.34 

917.89 

22,507.47 

4,552.44 

28,758.64 

82.04 

90.43 

116.37 

74.57 

Important issues to be noted: 

  By the end of 2017, following works were performed: interpretation of geological and 
geophysical data, geological and geophysical data analysis and assessment of reservoir 
data,  upgrading  the  geological  model  of  Lira  discovery  and  the  calculation  of  Lira 
reserves,  integrate  analysis  of  geological  and  geophysical  data.  Also,  new  prospects 
were  identified,  but  also  the  calculation  of  geological  resource  and  risk  evaluation 
were  carried  on.  Considering  that  Exploration  Stage  II  expires  on  May  5,  2018,  the 
Operator started to prepare the necessary documentation for the extension with another 
2  (two)  years  of  the  Exploration  Stage  and  optionally  with  one  and  a  half  year. 
Regarding TT&T budgetary category, because during the previous years the amounts 
were  not  spent  completely,  the  Operator  used  prevalently  the  amount  deferred  from 
the  previous  years.  From  the  budgetary  value  for  2017  the  amount  of  USD  500 
thousand  was  not  entirely  spent,  thus  being  deferred  for  the  following  periods 
(Association: Romgaz, Lukoil and PanAtlantic); 

  In  September  2017,  the  workover  RIG  was  put  into  service  for  1  Voitinel  well  and 
began re-testing the well. In December 2017, the well was tested with flows between 
50-80  thousand  m3/day.  The  documentation  necessary  to  re-put  the  well  into 
conservation  until  a  decision  is  made  regarding  the  way  to  exploit  the  discovery 
(Association: Romgaz and Aurelian Petroleum – currently Raffles); 

  On June 20, 2017, all the partners signed Romgaz’s Withdrawal Agreements from the 
two  companies  where  Romgaz  was  a  shareholder  as  well  as  the  Loan  Assignment 
Agreement  to  the  general  associate  of  the  two  entities.  The  Withdrawal  Costs  were 
established  from  the  related  obligations  to  2016  budget  of  the  two  companies,  to 
which Romgaz engaged  before the  withdrawal.  These  costs were in amount  of EUR 
2,985 for Cybinka Block and EUR 132,346 for Block Torzym, and were paid on June 
29,  2017.  (Association:  Romgaz,  Aurelian  Oil&Gas  Poland  and  Sceptre  Oil&Gas  - 
Polonia); 

  For  2017,  the  Managing  Committee  of  the  Association  approved  in  the  Investment 
Program the drilling of 3 new wells and putting them into production. The drilling was 

Page 55 of 94 

 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

proposed to be performed during Q1 2017, for the wells that were not drilled in 2016, 
Bibesti  212  and  211,  and  it  was  entirely  completed  and  the  wells  were  put  into 
production with costs lower than the costs previously estimated. In Q 4 began drilling 
well  Balta  Alba  120,  which  was  also  put  into  production.  Due  of  the  production 
decrease,  recompletion  operation  were  performed  for  8  wells  proposed  in  the  works 
program  in  order  to  bring  them  into  production  and  to  develop  the  gas  reserves. 
Surface  facilities  were  completed  for  Well  Bibesti  211,  212  and  Balta  Alba  120  by 
construction  of  a  gathering  pipeline,  installing  a  new  gas  dehydration  station  with  a 
capacity of 300000 Nm3 in order to increase the gas conditioning capacity for Bibesti 
Group.  3D  seismic  acquisition  was  made  for  a  surface  of  60  km2  for  Block  Bibeşti 
Sârdăneşti and abandonment works for 5 wells were completed. The works proposed 
and approved by the Operating Committee of the Association were performed entirely 
(Association: Romgaz and Amromco); 

  Proposed  works  were  not  completed  due  to  the  difficulties  which  the  Operator 
constantly  encounters,  difficulties  determined  both  by  the  local  community  and  the 
central  authorities.  For example,  environmental impact  studies  were required, lasting 
between  6  and  12  months,  for  Well  Smilno,  Block  Svidnik,  Ruska  Poruba,  block 
Medzilaborce  and,  probably,  a  similar  study  is  to  be  required  for  Well  Kriva  Olka, 
despite the fact that such requirements are unsubstantiated. Consequently, the Operator 
focused on securing the  access  to  a new location, Sarisske Cierne, where the former 
Operator,  Aurelian,  planned  to  drill  a  well  in  2012.  For  the  new  location,  Sarisske 
Cierne,  the  prospects  are  optimistic,  even  though  success  cannot  be  guaranteed 
(Association: Romgaz, Alpine Oil&Gas and JKX Oil&Gas - Slovacia); 

  The  Association  Agreement  with  Schlumberger  will  expire  in  2018.  In  2013, 
Schlumberger expressed its intention to extend the contractual period with another 10 
(ten)  years, until  2028.  Following this  requirement,  Romgaz performed  an economic 
analysis  resulting  that  the  association  is  and  will  be  profitable  both  in  case  Romgaz 
explores Laslaul Mare Field, as a sole partner and in association with Schlumberger, in 
terms  of  achievement  of  the  necessary  investments  for  maintaining  the  current 
production  trend.  Because,  in  Schlumberger’s  understanding,  future  income  to  cover 
the value of the investments scheduled to be performed between 2017 – 2018 cannot 
be  obtained,  and  because  Romgaz  did  not  agree  upon  any  possible  extension  of  the 
Agreement,  the  Works  Program  for  2017  shall  not  contain  any  investment  work.  In 
case  the  Association  Agreement  shall  not  be  extended,  Romgaz  is  bound  to  pay 
Schlumberger  the  undepreciated  value  of  the  investments  made  until  the  agreement 
expires. On August 31, 2018 the estimated undepreciated value is RON 21,806,108.34 
(approx. USD 5,451,527) (Association: Romgaz and Schlumberger). 

Page 56 of 94 

 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Government Decision No.831/August 4, 2010 on the approval of the privatization strategy by 
public  offering  of  Societatea  Nationala  de  Gaze  Naturale  “Romgaz”  S.A.  Medias,  and  the 
mandate of the public institution involved in the development of such process approved “the 
sale  by  secondary  initial  public  offering  of  shares  representing  15%  of  S.N.G.N.  “Romgaz 
S.A. share capital by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Business Environment, through the 
Office of State Ownership and Privatization in Industry”.  

Since  November  12,  2013,  the  company’s  shares  have  been  traded  on  the  regulated  market 
governed by BVB under the symbol “SNG”, and on the regulated market governed by  LSE 
(the London Stock Exchange) as GDRs issued by The Bank of New York Mellon under the 
symbol “SNGR”.  

Item 
No. 

Description 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

385,422,400  385,422,400  385,422,400  385,422,400  385,422,400 

1. 
Number of shares 
2.  Market capitalization5 
   *million RON 
   *million EUR 

3.  Maximum price (RON) 

4.  Minimum price (RON) 

5. 

6. 

Year end price (RON) 

Net profit per share (RON) 

7.  Gross  dividend  per  share 

(RON) 

13,178 
2,952 

35.60 

33.80 

34.19 

2.58 

2.57 

8. 

9. 

Dividend yield (7./5.x100) 

7.5% 

Exchange rate (RON/EUR) 

4.4639 

14,018 
3,127 

36.37 

32.41 

35.36 

3.66 

3.15 

8.9% 

4.4834 

10,483 
2,315 

36.55 

26.30 

27.20 

3.10 
2.70 

9.9% 

4.5285 

9,636 
2,122 

27.55 

21.60 

25.00 

2.66 
5.76*) 

12,064 
2,589 

33.95 

25.10 

31.30 

4.81 
4.99**) 

23.04% 

4.5411 

15.94% 

4.6597 

*) The gross dividend per share of RON 5.76 is composed of the gross dividend per share for financial year 2016 
in  amount  of  RON  2.40/share,  and  the  additional  gross  dividend  of    RON  1.42/share  resulted  from  the 
distribution  of  retained  earnings  and  the  additional  gross  dividend  of  RON  1.94/share  assigned  under  the 
provisions  of  Article  II  and  III  of  the  Government  Emergency  Ordinance  No.29/2017,  distributed  from  the 
company’s reserves, representing own financing sources.    
**) proposed dividend. 

For 2017, the share and GDR-s prices oscillated substantially, recording an increasing trend 
by  the  end  of  H  1,  followed  by  a  considerable  decrease,  due  to  ex-data  dividends  for  2016 
during Q 3 and by a recovery during Q 4, due to the additional dividends.     

Thus,  at  the  beginning  of  2017,  Romgaz  share  price  was  RON  25.20,  and  after  reaching  a 
minimum  of  RON  25.10  on  January  13,  2017,  the  share  price  increased  considerably, 
reaching a maximum of RON 33.95/share on May 29, 2017. Q 3 began with a low share price 
(minimum  RON  26.60/share  on  July  7,  2017,  after  the  registration  date  of  2016  dividends) 
and  subsequently  it  increased,  reaching  a  maximum  of  RON  31.80/share  on  September  11, 
2017,  after  noticing  the  market  in  respect  of  the  distribution  proposal  of  some  additional 
dividends. In Q 4, the share price registered low oscillation values as compared to the rest of 
the year, between the range RON 30.35 – 32.50/share. For the last trading day of the year, the 

5 Calculated on the basis of the closing price of the last trading day in the respective year, and on the basis of the 
exchange rate announced by BNR, valid for the last trading day in the respective year 

Page 57 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

share  price  was  RON  31.30/share,  by  24.21%  higher  than  the  share  value  registered  on 
January 31, 2017. 

The GDR-s registered a minimum price on the first trading day of the year (USD 5.67/GDR), 
following the same trend as the shares, with  a  maximum  value registered on May 26, 2017 
(USD 8.21/GDR). On December 29, 2017, the GDR price was by 39.33% higher than the first 
trading day, namely USD 7.90/GDR.  

Since the listing day up to present, Romgaz is considered an attractive company for investors 
and holds a significant position in the top of local issuers, being included in BVB indices as 
well as in indices of other markets, as follows:   

-  Second  place,  by  market  capitalization,  in  the  top  of  Premium  BVB  issuers.  With  a 
market  capitalization  amounting  to  RON  12,064  million  (respectively  EUR  2,589 
million)  as  of  December  31,  2017,  Romgaz  is  the  second  largest  listed  company  in 
Romania,  being  preceded  by  OMV  Petrom  with  a  capitalization  in  amount  of  RON 
16,200 million, respectively EUR 3,477 million;  

-  Fifth  place  as  regards  the  total  amount  of  transactions  in  2017,  in  the  top  of  local 
issuers  in  the  main  segment  of  BVB,  after  Fondul  Proprietatea,  Banca  Transilvania, 
BRD and OMV Petrom;   

-  Weight of 11,15%  and 9,76% in BET index (top 13 issuers) and respectively BET-XT 
index (top 25 issuers), 27.35% in BET-NG index (energy and utilities) and 11.61% in 
BET-TR index (BET Total Return). 

Performance of Romgaz shares between listing and December 31, 2017 to the BET index, is 
shown below:  

40,00

35,00

30,00

25,00

20,00

e
n
u
i
t
c
a
/
i
e

l

15,00

10,00

5,00

0,00

3
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
1
1

3
1
0
2
/
1
1
/
2
1

.

4
1
0
2
1
0
7
1

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
0
7
1

.

4
1
0
2
/
8
1
/
3

4
1
0
2
/
6
1
/
4

.

4
1
0
2
5
0
2
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
6
0
4
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
7
0
3
2

.

10000,00

9000,00

8000,00

7000,00

6000,00

5000,00

4000,00

3000,00

2000,00

1000,00

0,00

5
1
0
2
/
9
2
/
1

5
1
0
2
/
7
2
/
2

5
1
0
2
/
0
3
/
3

5
1
0
2
/
5
/
5

5
1
0
2
/
5
/
6

5
1
0
2
/
6
/
7

5
1
0
2
/
4
/
8

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
9

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
0
1

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
1
1

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
2
1

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
1

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
2

6
1
0
2
/
8
/
3

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
4

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
5

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
6

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
7

6
1
0
2
/
4
/
8

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
9

6
1
0
2
/
4
/
0
1

6
1
0
2
/
2
/
1
1

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
2
1

7
1
0
2
/
6
/
1

7
1
0
2
/
7
/
2

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
3

7
1
0
2
/
6
/
4

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
5

7
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
6

7
1
0
2
/
1
1
/
7

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
8

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
9

7
1
0
2
/
9
/
0
1

7
1
0
2
/
7
/
1
1

7
1
0
2
/
8
/
2
1

SNG

BET

.

4
1
0
2
0
1
3
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
1
1
1
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
1
3
2

.

4
1
0
2
/
2
2
/
8

.

4
1
0
2
9
0
4
2

.

Performance of GDRs traded on the London Stock Exchange and RON/USD exchange rate 
movements are shown below: 

Page 58 of 94 

 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

14,00

12,00

10,00

8,00

6,00

4,00

2,00

0,00

R
D
G
/
D
S
U

3
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
1
1

3
1
0
2
/
1
1
/
2
1

.

4
1
0
2
1
0
7
1

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
0
7
1

.

4
1
0
2
/
8
1
/
3

4
1
0
2
/
6
1
/
4

.

4
1
0
2
5
0
2
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
6
0
4
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
7
0
3
2

.

4
1
0
2
/
2
2
/
8

.

4
1
0
2
9
0
4
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
0
1
3
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
1
1
1
2

.

.

4
1
0
2
2
1
3
2

.

5,00

4,50

4,00

3,50

3,00

2,50

2,00

1,50

1,00

0,50

0,00

D
S
U
/
i
e

l

5
1
0
2
/
9
2
/
1

5
1
0
2
/
7
2
/
2

5
1
0
2
/
0
3
/
3

5
1
0
2
/
1
/
5

5
1
0
2
/
4
/
6

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
7

5
1
0
2
/
3
/
8

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
9

5
1
0
2
/
1
/
0
1

5
1
0
2
/
0
3
/
0
1

5
1
0
2
/
2
/
2
1

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
1

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
2

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
3

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
4

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
5

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
6

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
7

6
1
0
2
/
5
/
8

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
9

6
1
0
2
/
6
/
0
1

6
1
0
2
/
4
/
1
1

6
1
0
2
/
7
/
2
1

7
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
1

7
1
0
2
/
3
1
/
2

7
1
0
2
/
4
1
/
3

7
1
0
2
/
2
1
/
4

7
1
0
2
/
7
1
/
5

7
1
0
2
/
0
2
/
6

7
1
0
2
/
9
1
/
7

7
1
0
2
/
7
1
/
8

7
1
0
2
/
8
1
/
9

7
1
0
2
/
7
1
/
0
1

7
1
0
2
/
5
1
/
1
1

7
1
0
2
/
8
1
/
2
1

USD/GDR

lei/USD

The General Meeting of Shareholders determines the value of dividends  to be distributed to 
shareholders considering the specific legal provisions. 
Therefore,  Government  Ordinance  No.  64/20016  approved  by  Law  No.  nr.769/2001,  as 
amended,  provides  at  Article  1,  par.  (1),  let.  (f)  that  the  profit  after  deduction  of  profit  tax 
shall be distributed as follows, unless otherwise prescribed under special laws:  

a) legal reserves; 

b) other reserves representing tax facilities provided by law; 

c)  covering  accounting  losses  for  the  previous  years,  except  for  the  retained 
accounting losses as a result of adjustments required under the application of IAS 29 
“Financial Reporting  in Hyperinflationary Economies”, according to  the Accounting 
Regulations  compliant  with  the  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  and  the 
Accounting  Regulations  in  line  with  the  Council  Directive  86/635/EEC  and  the 
International Accounting Standards applicable to credit institutions; 
c^1)  setting  own  financing  sources  for  projects  co-financed  out  of  external  loans,  as 
well as for the amounts necessary for reimbursing capital instalments, paying interests, 
commissions and other costs related to these external loans; 

d) other distributions provided by law; 

e)  employees’  participation  to  profits;  national  companies  and  companies  fully  or 
majority owned by the state, as well as autonomous administrations which undertook 
and established in their income and expense budgets the obligation to participate in the 
distribution of profits,  as a result of the employees’ services  in  relation  thereto,  may 
grant these rights up to 10% of the net profit, however not exceeding the level of one 
monthly average base salary  of the relevant  company  during the  respective financial 
year; 

6  Government  Ordinance  No.  64/August  30,  2001,  on  distribution  of  profit  in  state-owned  companies  or 
companies where the state is sole or majority owner, as well as in autonomous regies 

Page 59 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

f)  a  minimum  of  50%  contribution  to  the  state  or  local  budget,  in  the  case  of 
autonomous  administrations,  or  dividends,  in  the  case  of  national  companies  and 
companies fully or majority owned by the state; 

g) the profit undistributed according to items a) - f) is distributed to other reserves and 
represents  own  financing  sources,  and  it  can  lately  be  distributed  as  dividends  or 
instalments to the state or the local budget in case of autonomous regies.   

Profit is distributed for the purposes and in the amounts referred to at paragraph (1)  items e), 
f), and g) after deduction of the amounts related to the purposes determined under special 
laws stipulated at items a), b), c), c^1), and d) of the same paragraph.  

Profit  is  distributed  subject  to  the  accounting  profit  recorded  under  statutory  financial 
statements  which  have  been  prepared  according  to  the  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards (IFRS), adopted by EU, in compliance with national legislation.  

In accounting terms, participation of employees in the distribution of profit is registered as a 
wage  related  expense  recognized  in  the  financial  statement  of  the  year  when  the  profit  was 
obtained by the Company. The participation of employees in the distribution of profit is paid 
in the subsequent year. 

By way of derogation from provisions of Law No. 31/1990 providing that the dividends must 
be  paid  no  later  than  six  months  after  the  approval  of  the  annual  financial  statements,  the 
state-owned  companies  are  required,  according  to  the  provisions  of  Government  Ordinance 
nr.64/2001,  to  pay  the  due  dividends  to  the  shareholders  within  60  days  from  the  legal 
deadline  for  the  submission  of  the  annual  financial  statements  of  the  competent  fiscal 
authorities.  
According to Government Emergency Ordinance No. 29/20177: 

  “The  amounts  distributed  in  the  previous  years  from  other  reserves  under  the 
provisions of Art. 1 let. (g) of Government Ordinance No.64/2001 [...], existing at the 
date  of  entry  into  force  of  this  Emergency  Ordinance,  can  be  redistributed  as 
dividends  [...]” - Art.II; 

  “After the approval of the financial statements of 2016, the entities provided in Art. 1, 
par. (1) of the Government Ordinance No.64/2001, [...], the retained earnings existing 
in the balance account on December 31, can be distributed as dividends” - Art.III par. 
(1). 

The table below shows the status of dividends for the years 2015-2017: 

Description  

2015 

2016 

Proposal 2017 

Dividends 

Gross dividends per share (RON/share) 

Dividend distribution rate (%) 

Number of share 

1,040,640,480 

2.70 

87.13 

2,220,033,024 
5.76*) 
141.24 

1,923,257,776 
4.99**) 
103.70 

385,422,400 

385,422,400 

385,422,400 

*) The gross dividend per share of RON 5.76 is composed of the gross dividend per share of the financial year 
2016  in  amount  of  RON  2.40/share,  and  the  additional  gross  dividend  of  RON  1.42/share  resulted  from  the 
distribution  of  retained  earnings  and  the  additional  gross  dividend  of  RON  1.94/share  assigned  under  the 
provisions  of  Article  II  and  III  of  the  Government  Emergency  Ordinance  No.29/2017,  distributed  from  the 
company’s reserves , representing own financing sources.    
**) proposed dividend. 

7Government  Emergency  Ordinance  No.  29  of    March  30,  2017,  to  amend  Art.  1  par.  (1)  let.  g)  of  the 
Government Ordinance No. 64/2001 on the distribution of profits in national companies, and trading companies 
with full or majority state capital, as well as in autonomous regies, and to amend Art. 1 par. (2) and (3) of the 
Government Emergency Ordinance no.109/2001 on corporate governance of public enterprises.  

Page 60 of 94 

 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

G.M.S. Resolution No.7/October 20, 2017, approved the distribution of additional dividends 
in gross total amount of RON 747,719,456 (RON 1.94/share).  

The  Government  of  Romania  mandated  the  state  representatives  in  the  General  Meeting  of 
Shareholders/the  Board  of  Directors  of  national  companies  and  majority  or  entirely  state 
owned  companies  and  of  autonomous  regies,  to  take  all  the  necessary  measures  for  the 
distribution  of  a  minimum  share  of 
in  2017  (as 
dividends/payments)  to  the  state  budget.  The  Government  took  this  decision  through  a 
Memorandum adopted at the meeting of February 8, 2018.  

  90%  of  net  profit  achieved 

The internal regulation “Dividend Policy” was approved by the company’s Board of Directors 
in March 2017 and is currently published on the company’s webpage   www.romgaz.ro, at the 
section “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance – Reference Documents”. 

Page 61 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The  selection  and  appointment  of  the  company’s  members  in  the  Board  of  Directors  was 
accomplished  in  compliance  with  the  provisions  of  the  GEO  No.109/2001  on  corporate 
governance in  state-owned enterprises,  as  amended, approved by  Law No.111/2016  and the 
Methodological Norms of Application (GD No. 722/2016).   

The members of the Board of Directors as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:  

Item 
No. 

Name  

Nistoran Dorin Liviu 

Position in 
the Board 

Chairman 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

Ciobanu Romeo Cristian 

member 

Cermonea Ioan Daniel 

member 

Grigorescu Remus 

member 

Baciu Sorana Rodica 

member 

Volintiru Adrian Constantin 

member 

Anghel Daniel Florin 

member 

Status*) 

Professional 
Qualification 

Institution of 
Employment 

independent 
non-executive  

independent 
non-executive 

independent 
non-executive 

independent 
non-executive 

independent 
non-executive 

independent 
non-executive 

non-executive 

Engineer 

PhD 
Engineer 

Engineer 

SC Televoice Grup 
SRL 

Universitatea Tehnică 
Iaşi 

Consiliul Judeţean 
Sibiu 

PhD in 
Economics 

Universitatea 
“Constantin 
Brâncoveanu” 

Economist 

SC Acgenio SRL 

Economist 

Legal adviser 
-Economist 

SC Exclusiv Clean 
International SRL 
Agenţia Naţională de 
Administrare Fiscală 

*) - members of the Board of Directors submitted the independent statements in compliance with the provisions of Romgaz 
Corporate Governance Code. 

During 2017, The Board of Directors underwent the following changes:   

-  On April 25, 2017: By G.M.S Resolution No.1/2017, Mr. Chisalita Dumitru, Mr. Jude 
Aristotel Marius, Mr. Stoicescu Razvan Florin and Mrs. Negrut Aurora were revoked 
from their positions as members of the Board, as a result of their mandates’ expiration 
on May 2017;    

-  On April 25, 2017: By Resolution No.1/2017, the G.M.S. appointed Mr. Stan Bogdan 
Nicolae,  Mr.  Chirila  Alexandru,  Mr.  Gheorghe  Gheorghe  Gabriel  and  Mr.  Metea 
Virgil Marius as interim members of the Board;  

-  On  May  10,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.11,  the  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Mr. 
Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel as chairman of the Board of Directors, by Resolution no.11; 
he was expected to exercise his duties as of May 15, 2017;  

-  On  June  7,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.14,  The  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Mr. 

Gheorghe Gheorghe Gabriel as chairman of the Board;  

-  On  July  27,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.18,  the  Board  of  Directors  took  note  of  Mr. 
Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel’s resignation from his position as a member of the Board, 
as of August 11, 2017 and acknowledged the vacancy of a position as member in the 
Board;  

-  On July 27, 2017: By Resolution No.18, the Board of Directors appointed Mrs. Baciu 
Sorana Rodica as interim member of the Board, as of August 11, 2017, until the next 
meeting of the G.M.S.;   

Page 62 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

-  On September 7, 2017: By Resolution No.5/2017, the G.M.S. elected, by cumulative 
vote, Mr. Gheorghe Gheorghe Gabriel, Mr. Stan Bogdan Nicolae, Mr. Ciobanu Romeo 
Cristian, Mr. Nistoran Dorin Liviu, Mr. Cermonea Ioan Daniel, Mr. Grigorescu Remus 
and Mrs. Baciu Sorana Rodica as members of the Board, for a 4 months mandate;  

-  On  September  14,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.26,  the  G.M.S.  appointed  Mr.  Gheorghe 

Gheorghe Gabriel, as the chairman of the Board;  

-  On October 19, 2017: By Resolution No.29, the Board of Directors took note  of Mr. 
Gheorghe Gheorghe Gabriel’s resignation from his position as chairman of the Board 
and acknowledged the vacancy of a position as member in the Board as of October 20, 
2017;  

-  On  October  19,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.29,  the  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Mr. 

Nistoran Dorin Liviu as the chairman of the Board;  

-  On  November  27,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.33,  the  G.M.S.  took  note  of  Mr.  Stan 
Bogdan  Nicolae’s  resignation  from  his  position  as  a  member  of  the  Board,  as  of 
November  7,  2017  and  acknowledged  the  vacancy  of  a  position  as  member  in  the 
Board; 

-  On  November  27,  2017:  By  Resolution  No.33,  the  G.M.S.  appointed  Mr.  Volintiru 
Adrian  Constantin  and  Mr.  Anghel  Daniel  Florin  as  interim  members  of  the  Board, 
until the next meeting of the G.M.S.; 

-  On December 20, 2017: By Resolution No.9/2017, the G.M.S. elected, by cumulative 
vote,  Mr.  Nistoran  Dorin  Liviu,  Mrs.  Baciu  Sorana  Rodica,  Mr.  Ciobanu  Romeo 
Cristian,  Mr.  Grigorescu  Remus,  Mr.  Cermonea  Daniel  Ioan,  Mr.  Volintiru  Adrian 
Constantin  and  Mr.  Anghel  Daniel  Florin  as  members  of  the  Board,  for  a  4  months 
mandate, as of January 8, 2018, or until the completion of the selection procedure of 
the directors  according to the G.E.O. No.109/2011;  

The Curricula Vitae of the current Board directors  of the company are to be found on the 
company’s webpage www.romgaz.ro, at “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance – The 
Board of Directors”. 

to 

the 

is  no  agreement, 
According 
understanding  or  family  relationship  between  them  and  another  person  that  contributed  to 
their appointment as directors.  

information  supplied  by  each  director, 

there 

As of December 31st, 2017, no member of the Board holds any shares within the company.  

Virgil Marius Metea - Director General (CEO) January 1- December 14, 2017 

By  Resolution  no.  8  of  June  12,  2013  the  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Mr.  Virgil  Marius 
Metea  as  director  general  and  delegated  internal  management  powers  and  representation 
competences to him. The Mandate Contract was concluded on a 4 year period (June 12, 2013-  
June  13,  2017)  and  can  be  renewed  by  addendum  upon  the  resolution  of  the  Board  of 
Directors.  

By  Resolution  no.  14  of  June  7,  2017  the  Board  of  Directors  approved  the  renewal  of  Mr. 
Virgil Marius Metea contract of mandate - Director General.  

Page 63 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

By Resolution no. 36 of December 14, 2017 the Board of Directors revoked the mandate of 
Mr. Virgil Marius Metea as director general. 

Cindrea Corin Emil - Director General (CEO) starting with December 14, 2017 

The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Cindrea Corin Emil by Resolution no. 37 of December 
14, 2017 as interim director general for a 4 month period, having the possibility to extend the 
mandate  up  to  maximum  6  months,  according  to  legal  provisions,  and  delegated  internal 
management powers and representation competences to him.  

Bobar Andrei – Chief Financial Officer (CFO) 

The  Board  of  Directors  appointed  Mr.  Bobar  Andrei  by  Resolution  no.  30  of  November  2, 
2017 as chief financial officer. The contract of mandate was concluded for a 4 month period, 
starting with November 2, 2017 and it will be automatically extended for successive periods 
of  4  months  until  appointment  of  a  Board  of  Directors,  whose  members  will  be  selected  in 
compliance  with  GEO  no.  109/2011.  Thereafter  the  Board  of  Directors  will  set  the 
performance indicators and objectives based on the Management Plan, as well as the term of 
the mandate. 

The  table  below  shows  the  management  positions  to  which  the  Board  of  Directors  did  not 
delegate managing powers: 

Name 

Position 

ROMGAZ - headquarters 
Rotar Dumitru Gheorghe 
Dobrescu Dumitru 
Bobar Andrei 
Chertes Viorel Claudiu 
Ciolpan Vasile 
Ştefănescu Dan Paul 
Stan Ioan 
Stancu Lucian Adrian 
Bodogae Horea Sorin 
Pavlovschi Vlad 
Balasz Bela Atila 
Morariu Dan Nicolae 
Bîrsan Mircea Lucian 
Sorescu Eugen 
Pleşa Vasile Gabriel 
Mediaş Branch 
Man Mihai Ioan 
Achimeţ Teodora Magdalena 
Şutoiu Florinel 
Seician Daniel 
Tîrgu Mureş Branch 
Dincă Ispasian Ioan 
Papoi Ilona 
Rusu Graţian 
Baciu Marius Tiberiu 
Ploieşti Branch 
Cârstea Vasile 
Ionescu Viorica Maria 

Deputy Director General  
Deputy Director General 
Chief Financial Officer (until November 2, 2017) 
Management Support  Director 
Energy Trade Director 
Exploration-Production Director 
Human Resources Director 
Corporate Management Director 
Procurement Direction Director 
Business Development Director  
Energy Management Director 
Information Technology and Telecommunication Director 
Technical Director 
Exploration Director 
Quality, Health, Safety and Environment Director 

Director 
Economic Director 
Production Director  
Technical Director 

Director 
Economic Director 
Production Director 
Technical Director 

Director 
Economic Director 

Page 64 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Vecerdea Dan Adrian 
Iernut Branch 
Bircea Angela 
Vlassa Susana Ramona 
Oprea Maria Aurica 
Ocrainiciuc Mihai 
SIRCOSS 
Stăncicu Sorin 
Bordeu Viorica 
Gheorghiu Sorin 
STTM 
Pop Traian 
Ilinca Cristian Alexandru 
Cioban Cristian Augustin 

Storage Director 

Director 
Economic Director 
Commercial Director 
Technical Director 

Director 
Economic Director 
Technical Director 

Director 
Economic Director 
Operation-Development Director 

The members of the executive management, except the director general and the chief financial 
officer (starting with November 2, 2017), are employees of the company, having an individual 
labour contract for an indefinite period.   

The  management  and  operating  personnel  are  employed,  promoted  and  dismissed  by  the 
director general based on the competences delegated to him by the Board of Directors.  

According to our information, there is no agreement, understanding or family relationship 
between  the members  of  the  above mentioned  executive  management  and  another  person 
that contributed to their appointment as members of the executive management. 

The  table  below  shows  the  number  of  shares  held  by  the  members  of  the  executive 
management as of December 31, 2017: 

Name and Surname 

Number of shares held 

Weight in the capital share (%) 

Item 
no. 
0 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

1 
Rotar Dumitru Gheorghe 

Bobar Andrei 

Ştefănescu Dan-Paul 

Cârstea Vasile 

Stăncicu Sorin 

Ilinca Cristian Alexandru 

Morariu Dan Nicolae 

Dincă Ispasian Ioan 

Vecerdea Dan Adrian 

20,611 

4,400 

601 

412 

76 

74 

52 

48 

45 

38 

2 

3 

0.00534764 

0.00114160 

0.00015593 

0.00010690 

0.00001972 

0.00001920 

0.00001349 

0.00001245 

0.00001168 

0.00000986 

10 

Balasz Bela Atila 

To  the  best  of  our  knowledge,  the  persons  mentioned  at  6.1  and  6.2  above,  have  not  been 
involved  in  litigations  or  administrative  proceedings  related  to  their  activity  in  Romgaz  in 
the last 5 years, nor in proceedings related to their capacity of fulfilling the duties. 

Page 65 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The individual financial  statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with 
the  provisions  of  the  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  (IFRS)  as  adopted  by  the 
European  Union  and  provisions  of  PFM  Order  no.  2844/2016.    For  the  purposes  of  the 
preparation of these individual financial statements, the functional currency of the Company 
is  deemed  to  be  the  Romanian  Leu  (RON).  IFRS,  as  adopted  by  the  EU,  differs  in  certain 
respects from  IFRS as issued by the IASB. However, the differences have no impact on the 
Company’s individual financial statements for the years presented. 

The  individual  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  on  a  going  concern  basis  in 
accordance with the historical cost convention. 

The  table  below  presents  a  summary  of  the  statement  of  individual  financial  position  as  of 
December 31, 2017: 

Indicator 

31.12.2015 

31.12.2016 

31.12.2017 

(RON 
thousand) 

(RON 
thousand) 

(RON 
thousand) 

Variance 
(2017/2016) 

0 

1 

2 

3 

4=(3-2)/2*100 

Assets 

Non current Assets 

Property, plant and equipment 

5,996,460 

5,789,262 

5,842,366 

Other intangible assets 

399,859 

397,864 

412,284 

Subsidiaries 

Associates 

Other Financial Investments 

Other non-current assets 

Deferred tax asset 

Total non-current assets 

Current Assets 
Inventories 

Trade and other receivables 

    Other financial assets 

      Other Assets 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Total current assets 

TOTAL ASSETS 

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

Capital and reserves 
    Share capital 

Reserves 

Retained earnings 

Total capital and reserves 

Non current liabilities 

Retirement benefit obligation 

Deferred tax liabilities 

Provisions 

Total non current liabilities 

0.92% 

3.62% 

0.00% 

0.00% 

0.03% 

- 

n/a 

-1.51% 

-3.68% 

116.15% 

-19.02% 
-4.12% 

-1.14% 

0.00% 

-23.43% 

5.46% 

-3.78% 

1,200 

163 

70,080 

29,300 

- 

1,200 

120 

69,657 

- 

- 

1,200 

120 

69,678 

- 

1,464 

6,497,062 

6,258,103 

6,327,112 

1.10% 

  389,515   

-32.37% 

559,784 
601,065 

575,983 
828,610 

2,146,827 

2,892,751 

139,612 

740,352 

141,525 

280,526 

4,187,640 

4,719,395 

 816,086  

 2,786,166  

 305,908  

 227,165  
4,524,840 

10,684,702 

10,977,498 

10,851,952 

385,422 

2,312,532 

6,612,922 

9,310,876 

385,422 

2,581,853 

6,724,947 

9,692,222 

 102,959  

 62,589  

 200,855  

366,403 

385,422 

3,020,152 

6,270,587 

9,676,161 

119,986  

 40,123  

 194,048  

354,157 

119,482 

-0.42% 

 -  

280,601 

400,083 

n/a 

44.60% 

12.97% 

Page 66 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

0 

1 

2 

3 

4=(3-2)/2*100 

Current liabilities 

Trade and other payables 

Current tax liabilities 

Income in advance 

Provisions 

Other liabilities 

Total current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

186,937 

  90,838   

- 

 28,779  

569,941 

  60,295   

4,924 

 50,437  

606,109 

128,520 

970 

76,290 

  319,523   

  261,583   

329,104    

626,077 

992,480 

947,180 

1,301,337 

1,140,993 

1,541,076 

TOTAL   EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

10,684,702 

10,977,498 

10,851,952 

6.35% 

113.15% 

-80.30% 

51.26% 

25.81% 

20.46% 

18.42% 

-1.14% 

NON-CURRENT ASSETS 

Other intangible assets 

Other intangible assets increased by 3.62% (RON 14.4 million) further to investments in 2D 
and  3D  seismic  and  geochemistry    due  to  the  5-year  extension  at  the  end  of  2016  of  the 
petroleum concession agreement for exploration-development-production for eight blocks.  

Deferred income tax 

Deferred income tax is based on the temporary differences between the accounting value and 
the fiscal value of balance sheet items. These temporary differences may be taxable, meaning 
they  will  result  in  taxable  values  when  determining  the  taxable  result  of  future  periods,  or 
deductible,  meaning  they  will  result  in  values  that  are  deductible  when  determining  the 
taxable  result  of  future  periods.  As  a  consequence  of  the  increase  of  deductible  temporary 
differences generated by the increase of the decommissioning provision and asset write offs 
from  the  exploration  activity,  which  according  to  the  effective  fiscal  code,  will  generate 
deductions in the income tax calculation for the future periods, the Company recorded at the 
end of 2017 a receivable related to the deferred tax. 

CURRENT ASSETS 

Inventories 

Inventories  decreased  at  the  end  of  2017  as  compared  to  2016  by  32.37%  because  of  a  gas 
stock  decrease  due  to  higher  gas  volumes  withdrawn  from  the  storage  as  compared  to  the 
previous year by 56.4% and due to 38.9% lower gas volumes injected in storages. 

Other assets 

Other assets increased in 2017 as compared to 2016 by 116.15% especially due to recording 
the receivables for the excises on the technological consumption to be recovered from ANAF 
further to finalising the fiscal inspection. 

Cash and cash equivalent. Other financial assets 

On  December  31,  2017,  cash  and  cash  equivalent  and  other  financial  assets  (bank  deposits 
and  purchased  state  bonds)  were  of  RON  3,013.33  million,  as  compared  to  RON  3,173.28 
million at the end of 2016, the decrease being generated by distributing additional dividends 
in 2017, besides the dividends for 2016.  

CAPITAL AND RESERVES 

Company’s  equity  decreased  by  3.78%  (RON  365.29  million)  as  compared  to  the  end  of 
2016, due to distributing to shareholders as dividends the result of 2016 and part of the result 
of  the  previous  years,  in  compliance  with  the  resolution  of  the  general  meeting  of 
shareholders. Additional dividends were distributed from Company reserves in 2017. 

Page 67 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Provisions  

Long-term  provisions  increased  by  44.64%  in  2017  as  compared  to  2016,  as  a  result  of 
increasing  the  provision  for  decommissioning  wells  that  are  going  to  be  written  off  in  the 
future. This increase is due to the rise of estimated costs for abandoning wells. 

CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Trade payables and other payables 

Trade  payables  and  other  payables  increased  on  December  31,  2017  by  12.47%  due  to  an 
increased gas production in the last quarter of 2017 as compared to the similar period of 2016, 
generating an increased petroleum royalty liability at the end of the year, and due to increase 
of delivered gas volumes and to the increased income from gas sales, that led to higher debts 
with the windfall tax obtained further to the price deregulation in the natural  gas sector and 
higher VAT debts. 

Provisions 

Short term provisions increased on December 31, 2017 by 51.26% due to the increase of the 
well decommissioning provision, as stated above and of the provision for restoring land to its 
agricultural use after decommissioning non-productive wells. 

The Company did not issue bonds or other debt instruments in financial year 2017. 

The  statement  of  comprehensive  income  for  the  period  January  1  –  December  31,  2017,  as 
compared to the similar period of the years 2016 and 2015, is shown below: 

Indicator 

0 

Revenue 

Cost of commodities sold 

Investment income 

Other gains and losses 

Changes in inventory of finished 
goods and work in progress 

Raw materials and consumables 
used 

Depreciation, amortization and 
impairment 

Year             
2015 
(thousand 
RON) 
1 

Year             
2016 
(thousand 
RON) 
2 

 4,052,684  

3,411,868  

 (40,228) 

 (49,878) 

 44,185  

 22,117  

 (318,903) 

 (468,218) 

Year           2017 
(thousand RON) 

Variance 
(2017/2016) 

4=(3-2)/2*100 

34.39% 

22.49% 

1.05% 

-74.30% 

3 
4,585,189 

(61,095) 

22,349 

(120,335) 

 138,181  

 20,963  

(186,651) 

n/a 

 (78,262) 

 (54,632) 

(64,329) 

17.75% 

 (793,598) 

 (311,012) 

(548,869) 

76.48% 

Employee benefit expense 

  (511,647) 

  (498,114) 

Finance cost 

Exploration expense 

Other expenses 

Other income 

Profit before tax 

Income tax expense 

Profit for the year 

 (20,302) 

 (18,275) 

 (42,395) 

 (253,348) 

(562,883) 

(18,624) 

(137,083) 

 (1,040,670) 

 (881,923) 

(1,090,647) 

 79,793  

 361,147  

1,468,838 

1,280,695 

(274,533) 

(256,116) 

1,194,285 

1,024,579 

364,169 

2,181,191 

(326,443) 

1,854,748 

13.00% 

1.91% 

-45.89% 

23.67% 

0.84% 

70.31% 

27.46% 

81.03% 

Page 68 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Revenue 

In  2017,  Romgaz  recorded  revenue  of  RON  4.59  billion  compared  to  RON  3.41  billion 
achieved in 2016. 

The  increase  resides  from  a  32.6%  rise  of  income  from  gas  sales  both  from  Romgaz 
production  and  gas  purchased  to  be  resold  and  from  partnerships,  as  well  as  further  to  the 
increase of income from electricity sales (38%) and underground storage activities (46.44%) 

Cost of Commodities Sold  

In 2017, cost of commodities sold increased by 22.49%, due to an increase by 172.81% of the 
cost of commodity gas sold, due to a quantity higher by 233% of commodity gas sold from 
import  and  from  internal  production.  Costs  generated  by  negative  unbalances  on  the 
electricity balancing market decreased by 66.1%. 

Other Gains and Losses 

In 2017 the Company estimated a net loss of RON 120.33 million, lower by RON 348 million 
as compared to  the same period of the previous year, due to  net  losses from  allowances for 
doubtful debts with exceeded due date that are lower than in the previous year by RON 348.5 
million. In 2017 there were recorded allowances for doubtful debts of RON 6 million. 

Changes in Inventory  

In  2017,  Romgaz  own  gas  quantities  withdrawn  from  storages  have  been  higher  than  the 
injected ones, generating an unfavourable change in inventories (loss). 

Raw Materials and Consumables Used 

The  cost  of  raw  materials  was  higher  in  2017  than  in  the  previous  year  due  to  a  higher 
technological consumption generated by the production increase.   

Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment 

Depreciation,  amortization  and  impairment  of  non-current  assets,  tangible  and  intangible 
increased in 2017 by 76.48% compared to 2016 mainly due to impairment of fixed assets and 
of exploration assets.  2017 recorded a net loss from these adjustments of RON 5.5 million, as 
compared to a net gain of RON 216.9 million in 2016. 

Employee benefit expense 

The  increase  of  employee  benefit  expenses  by  13%  compared  to  2016  is  due  both  to  the 
indexation  of  salaries  to  cover  the  inflation  and  granting  incentive  bonuses  for  remarkable 
results,  according  to  the  human  resource  policy,  as  well  as  to  the  expenses  with  employees 
participation  to  profit,  awarded  in  compliance  with  the  resolution  of  the  general  meeting  of 
shareholders  on  the  distribution  of  the  profit  for  2016;  the  expense  recorded  in  2017  was 
offset by releasing to income the provision set up in this respect at the end of 2016; the result 
of the current year was not influenced by this expense.  

Exploration expense 

Exploration expenses recorded a decrease of 45.89% as compared to the previous year due to 
a lower value of exploration projects that were relinquished in 2017. 

Other expenses  

In  2017,  other  expenses  recorded  an  increase  as  compared  to  the  previous  year  by  23.67% 
reaching RON 1,090.65 million, as compared to RON 881.92 million in 2016. The increase of 
this  expense  is  mainly  due  to  the  increase  of  production  and  of  gas  quantities  sold  in  the 

Page 69 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

current  year as  compared to  the previous  year, leading to  the increase of the windfall tax, a 
higher  petroleum  royalty  and  higher  expenses  with  the  transmission  of  the  delivered  gas.  A 
positive effect on other expenses was the elimination of the tax on special constructions. 

Other income 

The fiscal inspection related to the excise on the technological consumption was finalised in 
2017. The fiscal inspection team concluded that, with respect to the technological gas used for 
maintaining the production capacity, storage, transmission and gas distribution, the Company 
does not have to pay excises. Romgaz calculated, declared and paid excises worth RON 244 
million  for  the  technological  consumption  between  2010-2016,  which  is  to  be  recovered  by 
the  Company.  By  the  issue  of  the  final  report  for  2017  the  Company  recovered  RON  113 
million, by compensating debts with VAT and petroleum royalty, recorded on December 31, 
2017. 

Page 70 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Statements of cash flows recorded in the period 2015 – 2017 are shown in the table below: 

INDICATOR 
1 

Cash flow from operating activities 
Net Profit for the year 
Adjustments for: 
Income tax expense 
Interest expense  
Unwinding of decommissioning provision  
Interest revenue 
Loss on disposal of non-current assets 
Change in decommissioning provision recognized in profit or 
loss, other than unwinding 
Change in other provisions 
Expenses for provisions for impairment of exploration assets 
Exploration costs 
Impairment of property, plant and equipment  
Depreciation and amortization 
Impairment of investments in associates 
Impairment of other financial assets 
Losses from disposal of other financial investments 
Losses from trade receivables and other assets 
Income from dismantling fixed assets 
Write down allowance of inventory 
Income from prescribed debts 
Income from subsidies 

Movements in working capital 
(Increase)/Decrease in inventory 
(Increase)/Decrease in trade and other receivables 
(Increase)/Decrease in trade and other liabilities 
Cash generated from operations 
Interest paid 
Income tax paid 
Net cash generated by operating activities 
Cash flows from investing activities 
Investments in affiliated parts 
Investments in subsidiaries 
Payments for investment increase in associates 
(Increase)/Decrease in other financial assets 
Interest received 
Proceeds from sale of non-current assets 
Loan granted to associates 
Loans reimbursed by the associates 
 Dividends received 
Collection from sales of other financial investments 
Acquisition of non-current assets 
Acquisition of exploration assets 
Proceeds from disposal of associates  
Net cash used in financing activities 
Cash flows from financing activities 
Dividends paid 
Subsidies received 
Net cash used in financing activities 
Net  Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 

*thousand RON* 

2015 
2 

2016 
3 

2017 
4 

1,194,285 

1,024,579 

1,854,748 

274,553 
34 
20,268 
(44,185) 
23,084 
(19,724) 

21,852 
228,309 
42,395 
5,219 
560,070 
1,328 
6,809 
- 
292,146 
(2,232) 
(4,576) 
- 
- 
2,599,635 

(162,187) 
54,550 
(15,202) 
2,476,796 
(34) 
(346,021) 
2,130,741 

(753) 
(1,200) 
- 
158,050 
53,872 
42 
(726) 
65 
1,634 
- 
(357,281) 
(555,423) 
- 
(701,720) 

(1,214,925) 
- 
(1,214,925) 
214,096 
526,256 
740,352 

256,116 
15 
18,260 
(22,117) 
108,057 
(5,941) 

18,919 
(173,701) 
253,348 
(43,228) 
527,941 
43 
(1,554) 
1,577 
354,321 
(1,287) 
5,714 
- 
- 
2,321,062 

(21,646) 
(583,600) 
337,707 
2,053,523 
(15) 
(309,125) 
1,744,383 

- 
- 
- 
(720,480) 
25,178 
144 
- 
- 
- 
400 
(296,511) 
(172,178) 
- 
(1,163,447) 

(1,040,762) 
- 
(1,040,762) 
(459,826) 
740,352 
280,526 

326,443 
3 
18,621 
(22,349) 
72,668 
11,693 

11,389 
(17,711) 
137,083 
23,206 
543,374 
(12,462) 
(21) 
12,308 
38,575 
- 
8,147 
(610) 
(150) 
3,004,955 

178,363 
(180,283) 
105,983 
3,109,018 
(3) 
(309,956) 
2,799,059 

- 
- 
(144) 
104,964 
20,908 
207 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(478,404) 
(280,659) 
298 
(632,830) 

(2,220,003) 
413 
(2,219,590) 
(53,361) 
280,526 
227,165 

Page 71 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Corporate  governance  accommodates  continuously  to  the  requirements  of  a  modern 
economy, to increasing globalization of social life and to investors and interested parties need 
for information on companies business. 

As a national company Romgaz has to comply with GEO No. 109 of November 30, 2011 on 
public  companies  corporate  governance,  as  amended  and  supplemented  (the  “Ordinance”), 
approved  by  Law  111/2016  and  Government  Decision  no.  772  of  September  28,  2016  on 
Methodological  Norms  for  establishing  the  financial  and  nonfinancial  performance  criteria 
and  variable  component  of  remuneration  of  Board  members,  or  if  applicable,  of  the 
supervisory board members, and of managers and members of the directorate.  

The Ordinance sets up a number of principles and provisions to ensure their application.  

Principles included in the Ordinance are as follows:  

  Clear  separation  of  authorities  deriving  from  shareholder  from  those  deriving 

from directorship/managing of the company.  

  Principle of transparency, non-discrimination and equal treatment in the selection 

process of  Board members;  

  Principle of proportional representation in the Board of Directors; 

  Minority shareholders protection by observing transparency principles;  

  Transparency principle; 

  Principle of mandatory reporting to the GMS as prescribed by law. 

Ordinance  provisions  are  observed  by  the  company,  and  are  included  in  the  Company’s 
Articles  of  Incorporation,  as  amended  and  approved  by  the  company’s  shareholders  in  the 
following resolutions no. 19 of October 18, 2013; no. 5 of July 30, 2014, no. 8 of October 29, 
2015, no.9 of October 28, 2016 and no.4 of August 9, 2017  (latest update of the Articles of 
Incorporation).  

The  updated  Company’s  Articles  of  Incorporation 
www.romgaz.ro, at “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance - Reference Documents”. 

is  posted  on 

the  webpage 

Since November 12, 2013, Romgaz shares have been traded on the regulated market governed 
by BVB, at category  I, under the symbol “SNG”, as well as on the London Stock Exchange 
(where GDRs are traded) under the symbol “SNGR”.  

On  January  5,  2015,  after  the  Financial  Supervisory  Authority  approved  the  proposals  to 
amend  BVB’s  regulations,  Romgaz  was  admitted  into  the  PREMIUM  category  of  BVB 
regulated market. 

As issuer of securities traded on the regulated market, Romgaz has to fully comply with the 
corporate  governance  standards  provided  by  applicable  national  regulations,  namely  the 
Corporate  Governance  Code  of  BVB,  posted  on  the  internet  webpage  www.bvb.ro,  at 
“Investor Relations – Regulations - BVB Regulation”. 

The corporate Governance System was and will be continuously improved according to rules 
and  recommendations  applicable  to  Companies  listed  on  Bucharest  Stock  Exchange  and  on 
London Stock Exchange. 

Some of the already implemented measures include:  

Page 72 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Elaboration of a new Corporate Governance Code, in accordance with the new Corporate 
Governance Code of BVB applicable since January 4, 2016 – the document was approved 
by  Romgaz  Board  of  Directors  by  Resolution  no.2/  January  28,  2016.  The  Corporate 
Governance  Code  was  updated  and  shall  be  submitted  for  approval  of  the  Board  of 
Directors. 

The  Company’s  Articles  of  Incorporation  is  posted  on  the  webpage  www.romgaz.ro,  at 
“Investor Relations – Corporate Governance – Reference Documents”. 

  Board of Directors approval and update of the Internal Rules for the advisory committees 
during  the  meetings  held  on  March  24,  2016  (for  all  committees)  and  March  23,  2017 
(update of the Internal Rules of the Strategy Committee). All other Internal Rules of the 
advisory  committees  were  amended  in  2017  to  include  the  latest  legal  changes  on 
corporate governance (Law No. 111/2016 and GD No. 722/2016). The rules were updated 
and are going to be submitted for approval of the Board of Directors. 

  Update  of  the  Terms  of  Reference  of  the  Board  of  Directors  to  include  the  latest  legal 
changes on corporate governance. The Terms of Reference  were approved by the Board 
of Directors on March 23, 2017 and update subsequently in January 2018; 

  Elaboration  of  internal  regulation  in  compliance  with  the  new  Corporate  Governance 

Code of BVB. 

Policy  regarding  Dividends  and  the  Policy  regarding  Forecasts  were  approved  by  the 
Board of Directors on March 23, 2017 and all other policies were update and are going to 
be submitted for approval of the Board of Directors. 

Other rules/policies were elaborated/updated by the members of the committees and of the 
Board in 2017, such are going to be finalised and approved in the following period. 

  Include  in  the  Board  of  Directors’  Report  a  chapter  dedicated  to  corporate  governance 
referring, among others, to : the applicable Corporate Governance Code, the duties of the 
executive  management  and  of  the  three  advisory  committees  of  the  Board  of  Directors 
(Nomination  and  Remuneration  Committee  and  Audit  Committee  and  the  Strategy 
Committee), aspects  related to  remuneration of  members of the Board  and of  managers, 
measures to improve the corporate governance, aspects related to internal control and risk 
management system and aspects related to social responsibility; 

  Include  in  the  Board  of  Directors’  Report  a  section  referring  to  compliance  with  the 

provisions of  BVB Corporate Governance Code (Annex 1); 

  Diversify communication ways with shareholders and investors by posting on the website 
announcements addressed to market players, half year and quarterly financial statements, 
annual reports, procedures to follow for access and participation to GMS, and by setting 
up  of  an  “Infoline”  for  shareholders/investors  to  respond  to  their  requirements  and/or 
questions;  

  Establish a specialized department dedicated to investor and shareholder relations; 

  Conclusion of professional liability insurance for directors and managers and appointment 

of a person to monitor such contracts; 

  Starting  the  procedures  necessary  for  the  adopting  and  implementing  the  National 
Anticorruption Strategy. Therefore, a Commission has been established, responsible with 
the  implementation  of  the  strategy  provisions;  the  Director  General  has  adopted  the 
Statement  of  Adherence  to  the  National  Anticorruption  Strategy  and  Integrity  Plan  for 
2017    and  2018,  documents  published  on  the  internet  website    at    “Investor  Relations  – 
Corporate Governance – Transparency”. 

Some of the measures to be implemented: 

Page 73 of 94 

 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Implement  a  remuneration  policy  for  the  executive  management,  with  a  fixed  and 
variable  component  that  depends on the results of their evaluation.  According to  the 
Corporate  Governance  Code  of  London  Stock  Exchange,  long  term  bonus  schemes 
should be submitted for approval of the shareholders (GMS). 

The shareholders structure is described in Chapter II “Romgaz at a glance” 

Romgaz  respects  and  protects  the  rights  and  legitimate  interests  of  shareholders.  The 
Company  undertakes  all  the  necessary  efforts  to  facilitate  the  exercitation  of  shareholders’ 
rights, under the law and in compliance with the Articles of Incorporation.  

A separate document on rules and procedures of the general meeting of shareholders setting 
the framework for Romgaz GMS is drafted and is going to be submitted for the approval of 
the Board of Directors in the first months of 2018. 

The  General  Meeting  of  Shareholders  is  called  by  the  Board  of  Directors,  whenever 
necessary,  in  accordance  with  the  legal  provisions.  The  convening  notices  and  the  GMS 
resolutions  are  sent  to  Bucharest  Stock  Exchange,  London  Stock  Exchange  and  to  the 
Financial Supervisory Authority in compliance with the regulations of the capital market and 
will  be  published  on  the  company’s  website  at  “Investor  Relations  –  General  Meeting  of 
Shareholders”.   

The Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders has the following main competencies: 

a)  to approve the company’s strategic objectives; 
b)  to discuss, approve or amend, as the case may be, the annual financial statements of 
the  company  based  on  the  reports  submitted  by  the  Board  of  Directors  and  the 
financial auditor, and to set the dividends; 

c)  to  discuss,  approve  or  request,  as  the  case  may  be,  the  addition  or  review  of  the 

company’s management plan, under legal provisions.  

d)  to set the income and expenditure budget for the following financial year; 
e)  to appoint and to dismiss the Board members and to set their remuneration; 
f)  to make an opinion on the governance of the Board of Directors;  
g)  to  appoint  and  to  dismiss  the  financial  auditor  and  to  set  the  minimum  term  of  the 

financial audit contract; 

h)  to  approve  contracting  bank  loans,  whose  value  exceeds,  individually  or  cumulated 
with other bank loans in progress over a financial year,  EUR 100 million, equivalent 
in RON; 

i)  approval  of  documents  for  establishing  guarantees,  other  than  guarantees  for  the 
company’s  non-current  assets,  with  individual  or  cumulated  value  with  other 
established  guarantees  other  than  guarantees  in  progress  for  the  company’s  non-
current assets over a financial year of EUR 50 million, equivalent in RON.  

The Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders has the following main competencies: 

a)  to change  company’s legal form; 
b)  to move the headquarters; 
c)  to change the company’s scope of activity; 
d)  to  incorporate  and  to  conclude  or  amend  incorporation  documents  of  the  companies 

where Romgaz is managing partner;  

e)  to conclude or amend joint venture contracts where the company is contracting party; 

Page 74 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

the anticipated winding up of the company; 
to convert shares from a category into the other; 

f)  to increase the share capital; 
g)  to reduce the share capital or to restore it by issuing new shares; 
h)  to merge with other companies or to spin-off the company; 
i) 
j) 
k)  to convert one category of bonds into another one or in shares; 
l) 
m)  to conclude the documents related to the acquisition of non-current assets whose value 
exceeds,  separately  or  cumulatively,  during  a  financial  year,  20%  of  the  total  non-
current assets of the company, except for receivables; 

to issue bonds; 

n)  to  conclude  the  documents  related  to  disposal,  exchange  and  set  up  of  guaranties 
referring  to  non-current  assets  whose  value  exceeds,  separately  or  cumulatively, 
during a financial year, 20% of the total non-current assets, except for receivables; 
o)  to  conclude  the  documents  related  to  rental  for  a  period  longer  than  1  (one)  year  of 
tangible  assets  to  the  same  contractors  or  to  persons  involved  or  acting  together, 
whose  value  exceeds,  separately  or  cumulatively,  20%  of  the  total  tangible  assets, 
except for receivables at the document conclusion date; 

p)  any other change in the articles of incorporation or any other resolution that requires 

the approval of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.  

Romgaz is a  joint-stock company governed under an one-tier system. 

The  Board  of  Directors  consists  of  7  (seven)  directors  elected  by  the  general  meeting  of 
shareholders, in compliance with legal applicable provisions and the provisions of the Articles 
of Incorporation, one of its members is appointed Chairman of the Board. 

Board  of  Directors  composition  observes  the  legal  criteria/conditions  on  the  share  of  non-
executive  and  independent  directors,  the  studies  and  competencies,  experience  and  gender 
diversity (criteria detailed in the Board of Directors Terms of Reference). 

Board of Directors composition on December 31, 2017 is presented in Chapter VI “Company 
management”. According to the independency declarations sent to the company, five directors 
have  declared  to  be  independent  and  one  as  non-independent.  Independence  of  Board 
members  is  determined  based  on  criteria  detailed  in  Romgaz  Corporate  Governance  Code 
(art.6). 

Aspects on directors’ rights, obligations and competencies, as well as aspects related to Board 
meetings are detailed in the Articles of Incorporation and in the Board of Directors Terms of 
Reference.  

Until December 31, 2017 the Board of Directors did not make a self- assessment for 2017.  

In its activity, the Board of Directors is supported by three advisory committees, namely: the 
nomination and remuneration committee, the audit committee and the strategy committee.  
The Audit  Committee has legal  competencies provided in  Article  65 of Law No. 162/21078 
consisting mainly in monitoring the financial reporting process, the internal control systems, 
the internal audit and risk management systems within the company, as well as in controlling 
the  statutory  audit  activity  related  to  annual  financial  statements  and  managing  the 
relationship with the external auditor.  

8 Law No. 162 of July 15, 2017 on the statutory audit of annual financial statements and of annual consolidated 
financial statements and of amending pieces of legislation 

Page 75 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The  Nomination  and  Remuneration  committee  has,  basically,  the  competence  to  set  the 
procedures  for  selecting  the  candidates  for  the  director  and  manager  positions,  and  to  make 
proposals  for  the  director’s  position  and  to  get  involved  in  the  selection  and  recruitment 
procedure  or  managers,  and  to  make  proposals  on  their  remunerations.  The  committee  has 
also the obligation to elaborate during the financial year an annual report on the remuneration 
and other benefits awarded to directors and managers. 

The main scope of the strategy committee is to coordinate drafting/update and monitoring of 
the  company’s  development  strategies,  correlated  with  the  national  and  European  energy 
strategy, to  analyse the implementation  of such strategies and the measures needed to  reach 
the objectives set, to monitor the business diversification projects by achieving investments. 

The detailed presentation of attributions and responsibilities of each committee may be found 
in  their  respective  Internal  Rules  published  on  the  company’s  webpage  www.romgaz.ro  at 
“Investor Relations – Corporate Governance – Reference Documents”. 

On December 31, 2017, the advisory committees’ structure was the following:  

I) Nomination and Remuneration Committee: 

  Cermonea Daniel Ioan (chairman) 

  Nistoran Dorin Liviu 

  Baciu Sorana Rodica 

  Grigorescu Remus 

II) Audit Committee 

  Baciu Sorana Rodica  (chairman) 

  Grigorescu Remus 

  Ceremonea Daniel Ioan 

  Ciobanu Romeo Cristian 

III) Strategy Committee 

  Grigorescu Remus (chairman) 

  Nistoran Dorin Liviu 

  Baciu Sorana Rodica 

Information regarding the Board of Directors’ meetings and the Advisory Committees during 
2017 

During 2017, the Board  of Directors held  a number of  27 meetings,  in  compliance with  the 
legal and statutory provisions, out of which: 

  15 effective meetings of the directors and 

  12 conference-call meetings. 

The attendance at the Board of Directors’ meetings: 

First name and last name 

Number of meetings 
during the mandate 

Chisăliţă Dumitru 

8 

P 

A 

NP 

no. 
8 

% 
100.0 

no. 

% 

no. 

% 

Page 76 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Negruţ Aurora 

Jude Aristotel Marius 

Stoicescu Florin Răzvan 

Jansen Petrus Antonius Maria  

Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel 

Buzatu Florin Dănuţ 

Chirilă Alexandru 

Stan Bogdan Nicolae 

Gheorghe Gheorghe Gabriel 

Metea Virgil Marius 

Baciu Sorana Rodica 

Nistoran Dan Liviu 

Ciobanu Romeo Cristian 

Cermonea Daniel Ioan 

Grigorescu Remus 

Volintiru Adrian Constantin 

Anghel Daniel Florin 

where: 
P   = participate 
A = power of attorney 
NP = did not participate 

8 

8 

8 

18 

16 

18 

10 

14 

13 

10 

11 

9 

9 

9 

9 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

12.5 

12.5 

5.6 

5.6 

10.0 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

12.5 

12.5 

12.5 

11.1 

6.25 

11.1 

9 

64.3 

2 

18.2 

2 

1 

22.2 

11.1 

7 

6 

6 

15 

15 

15 

9 

5 

13 

10 

9 

9 

7 

8 

9 

2 

2 

87.5 

75.0 

75.0 

83.3 

93.75 

83.3 

90.0 

35.7 

100.0 

100.0 

81.8 

100.0 

77.8 

88.9 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0 

Attendance at Advisory Committees’ meetings: 

Nomination and Remuneration Committee: 11 meetings 

First name and last name 

Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel 
Negruţ Aurora 
Jansen Peter Antonius Maria 
Stoicescu Răzvan Florin 
Buzatu Florin Dănuţ 
Chirilă Alexandru 
Gheorghe Gheorghe Gabriel 
Nistoran Dorin Liviu 
Stan Bogdan  
Cermonea Ioan Daniel 
Grigorescu Remus 

physical attendance 
7 
3 
5 
3 
5 
3 
5 
4 
1 
4 
3 

Audit committee: 4 meetings 

First name and last name 

Jansen Peter Antonius Maria 
Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel 
Jude Marius Aristotel 
Buzatu Florin Dănuţ 
Stoicescu Răzvan Florin 
Baciu Sorana Rodica 
Ciobanu Romeo Cristian 

physical attendance 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
3 
3 

Page 77 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Grigorescu Remus 
Cermonea Ioan Daniel 

3 
2 

Strategy Committee: 2 meetings 

First name and last name 

Negruț Aurora 
Chisăliță Dumitru 
Tcaciuc Sebastian Gabriel 
Jude Marius Aristotel 
Buzatu Florin Dănuţ 

physical attendance 
2 
2 
1 
2 
1 

In  compliance  with  the  company’s  Articles  of  Incorporation  “the  Board  of  Directors  shall 
assign,  totally  or  part  of,  the  management  competences  of  the  Company  to  one  or  more 
managers, appointing one of them as Director General” Article 24, paragraph (1), “manager” 
meaning  “the  person  to  whom  the  Board  of  Directors  delegated  authority  to  manage  the 
company” Article 24, paragraph (12). 

Mr. Metea Virgil Marius acted as Director General between January 1 – December 14, 2017 
having the following responsibilities and duties delegated by the Board of Directors: 

A.  Responsibilities and duties related to internal management:  

  approves the organization and functioning chart; 

  approves  the  Organization  and  Functioning  Regulations  as  well  as  other  internal 

documents regulating the activity of the company related to its employees; 

  approves the employment, promotion and dismissal of employees; 

  approves the responsibilities and duties of the employees; 

  approves the disciplinary reward and sanction of the employees; 

  approves  the  specific  operations  necessary  and  useful  for  achieving  the  scope  of 

activity; 

  fulfils  any  accessory  duties,  namely  any  acts  and  special  operations  necessary  and 

useful for achieving the above mentioned duties ; 

B. Responsibilities and duties related to the representation of the company: 

  represents the company when concluding/issuing legal documents; 

  represents the company in pre-contractual, administrative and/legal procedures;  

  fulfills  any  accessory  duties,  namely  any  acts  and  special  operations  necessary  and 

useful for achieving the above mentioned duties. 

Starting  with  December  14,  2017  the  interim  Director  General  is  Mr.  Cindrea  Corin  Emil, 
being delegated a series of competencies related to company management. 

The  Director  General  must  periodically  inform  the  Board  of  Directors  on  the  manner  of 
achieving the assigned duties, as well as the right to request and to obtain instructions on the 
manner of exercising the assigned duties. 

Page 78 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Internal audit activity is organised and conducted in compliance with: 

  Law 672/2002 on the internal public audit; 
  Own  methodological  norms,  issued  under  GD  No.  1086/2013  on  approving  the 

General Norms on exercising the internal public audit; 

  Order of the Ministry of Public Finances No. 252/2004, Code of ethics of the internal 

auditor, as subsequently amended and supplemented; 

  SNGN Romgaz SA Corporate Governance Code: 
  SNGN Romgaz SA Internal Audit Charter. 

Romgaz sets and keeps the internal audit activity operational, being performed independently 
from  other  functions  and  activities.  According  to  the  effective  laws,  the  Internal  Audit 
Department  is  directly  subordinated  to  the  Director  General,  but  reports  to  the  Board  of 
Directors through the Audit Committee.  

Internal  auditing  mission,  attributions  and  responsibilities  are  defined  in  the  Internal  Audit 
Charter approved by the Director General. The charter sets the position of the internal audit 
within  the  company,  sets  the  manner  for  accessing  company’s  documents  in  order  to  duly 
fulfil audit missions and defines their scope of activity. 

Internal auditing is conducted permanently in order to provide an independent evaluation of 
operations,  control  and  its  management  processes,  evaluates  the  potential  risk  exposure  of 
various  business  segments  (asset  security,  compliance  with  laws  and  contracts,  integrity  of 
operational and financial information etc.) makes recommendation for improving the systems, 
controls  and  procedures  to  ensure  efficiency  of  operations  and  observes  the  proposed 
corrective actions and the results. 

Internal auditing is conducted as follows: 

  Evaluate the management and internal control systems – system audit; 
  Evaluate  results  of  the  monitored  objectives  and  examine  the  effective  impact  – 

performance audit; 

  Ensure conformity of procedures and operations with legal requirements  – regularity 

audit. 

The internal audit activity was performed in 2017 according to the audit plan prepared based 
on  the  risk  analysis  related  to  auditable  activities  of  the  company  within  their  scope  of 
activity. The audit plan and the resources necessary for performing the activity were endorsed 
by  the  Audit  Committee  and  approved  by  the  Director  General,  aiming  to  include  the 
company’s  activities  and  operations  that  fall  within  the  audit’s  scope  of  activity.  Internal 
auditing  activity  is  independent  and  objective  ensuring  the  company  on  the  control  of  the 
operations,  being  conducted  according  to  approved  procedures.  Each  audit  mission  has  a 
detailed program comprising the applicability area, objectives, resources allocated thereto and 
the term.  

Objectives  of  the  internal  audit  are  supporting  the  company  in  identifying  and  evaluating 
significant risks in order to provide an independent evaluation of risk management, of control 
and  management  processes  and  supporting  the  company  in  maintaining  an  efficient  and 
effective control system.  

The main activities and operations of the company that underwent  an internal  audit in 2017 
were: 

  Production and production management; 
  Investments and project management; 

Page 79 of 94 

 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Analysis  of  the  progress  on  conformity  with  BVB  Corporate  Governance  Code 

according to the “Comply or Explain” Statement. 

The internal auditor reports to the Director General and to the Audit Committee on the scope 
of the audit activity, its results, conclusions, recommendations and proposals made. Activities 
and  operations  performed  by  the  company  in  2017  that  were  audited,  can  be  considered  as 
compliant with the company’s policies, programs and management, with the legal provisions 
and internal rules. No significant situations were identified to require a Form for findings and 
irregularities reporting (F.C.R.I.9).  

Company’s Policies and Objectives related to Risk Management 

In  accordance  with  the  Corporate  Governance  Code,  one  important  role  played  by  the 
company’s management is to ensure that an efficient risk management system is in place. 

One major concern of the management is to raise the awareness on the objectives of the risk 
management process,  the necessity of direct  implication in  the risk management  process,  as 
well as the alignment to the latest practices in the sector by complying with the effective laws, 
standards and norms related to such process. 

The company’s risk management system is implemented in accordance with: 

   the Order of  the Ministry of Public Finances no. 400 of June 12, 2015 for approval of 

the Internal / Management Control Code  

  Government  Ordinance  no.119/1999  (Article  4)  on  the  internal  control  and  the 

preventive financial control; 

  Law  no.  234  of  December  7,  2010  amending  and  supplementing  Government 

Ordinance no. 119/1999,  

  International  Standard  ISO  31010:2009:  “Risk  management  –  risk  assessment 

techniques”; 

  International  Standard 

ISO  31000:2009:  “Risk  management/Principles  and 

guidelines”; 

  Romanian Standard SR Guidelines 73:2009: “Risk management-Vocabulary”. 

Consequently, in compliance with the risk management process, the company systematically 
analyses,  at  least  once  a  year,  the  risks  related  to  its  objectives  and  activities  and  prepares 
adequate  remedy  plans  in  order  to  mitigate  the  possible  consequences  of  such  risks,  and 
appoints employees responsible for implementing those plans.  

Moreover, the risk management system implemented within the company is an integral part of 
the  decision  making  process  by  setting  the  requirement  to  use  a  risk  management  analysis 
when  drafting  any  and  every  complex  document  (technical  projects,  execution  projects, 
reservoir studies).  

The  main  benefit  of  the  risk  management  process  is  the  improvement  of  the  company’s 
performance by identifying, analysing, assessing and managing all risks within the company, 
in  order  to  minimize  the  negative  risk  consequences  or  to  increase  the  positive  risk 
consequences, as the case may be.  

9 F.C.R.I  - Form for findings and irregularities reporting  

Page 80 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

A  risk  management  department  has  been  established  for  an  efficient  assessment  of  the 
company’s risks. One major task of this department is drafting the company’s final documents 
in  terms  of  risk  management:  Final  Risk  Register,  Final  Risk  Report,  Final  Measure 
Implementation Plan and the Company’s Risk Profile. 

Three role levels are set up in the risk management system: 

  base level, represented by those who identify risks and by the risk managers (head of 
each  organizational  unit)  who  are  responsible  for  preparing  risk  management 
documents related to the level of the unit they manage; 

  middle  level,  represented  by  the  company’s  middle  management,  who  together  with 
the  heads  of  the  organizational  units  form  the  Risk  Management  Commission  that 
respective  
facilitates  and  coordinates 
direction/department/division; 

the  management  process  within 

the 

  high level, represented by the executive upper management through the Risk Analysis 
and  Management  Commission  that  approves  the  company’s  risk  appetite  and  risk 
profile in accordance with its objectives. 

General scope of the risk management activity: 

1.  setting  the  general  uniform  framework  for  risks  identification,  analysis  and 

management; 

2.  providing the appropriate tool for a controlled and efficient risk management; 

3.  describing the manner in which control measures are set and implemented in order to 

prevent the occurrence of negative risks. 

Some of the analysed risk categories are: financial risks, market risks, occupational health and 
safety  risks,  personnel  risks,  risks  related  to  information  systems,  and  legal  and  regulatory 
risks. 

All risks are analysed from following perspectives: 

  specific objective the risk refers to; 

  causes of risk occurrence; 

  consequences  further to risk materialization; 

  occurrence probabilities; 

 

 

 

 

 

risk materialization impact; 

risk exposure; 

risk response strategy; 

recommended control (remedy) measures; 

residual risks remaining after treatment of initial risks. 

Internal control 

In  Romgaz,  the  internal  control  system  operates  in  a  control  environment  in  a  continuous 
change that requires the adjustment of control at the level of every activity, differentially and 
integrative, established in relation to the company’s interests.  

The internal control has to be perceived as a management function and it is the manager’s and 
each  employer’s  task  to  organise  and  to  ensure  functioning  of  the  internal  management 

Page 81 of 94 

 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

control system so as to observe the general frame set by legal provisions and to be adapted to 
the company’s specificity.  

Internal  control  is  a  process  carried  out  by  the  personnel  at  all  levels:  board  of  directors, 
executive management, entire personnel, respectively. It is carried out by the top management 
and bottom management, such as compartments responsible and the other employees as well. 
Each member of the company is responsible with his internal control.  

The  control  system  developed  and  implemented  in  Romgaz,  as  part  of  the  management 
process, targets all the activities of the organizational units, at all levels of management, and 
aims  to  achieve  the  objectives  under  the  condition  of  risk  identification  and  management 
related to such.  

The internal management control has to ensure the following:  

-  compliance with the law in force; 
-  applying the management resolutions; 
-  a good functioning of internal activity; 
-  efficiency of operations; 
-  efficient use of resources; 
-  prevention and control of risks of non-fulfilment of set objectives.  

Repealing Ministry of Public Finance Order 946/200510 and entering into force of SGG Order 
no  400/201511  in  June  2015  supplemented  by  SGG  Order  no.  200/201612  generated  a  new 
conceptualization  of  the  main  internal  control  directions  in  Romgaz  aiming  at  creating  a 
tighter  and  more  coherent  bond  with  the  other  management  control  instruments  –  internal 
audit  and  risk  management  system,  and  internal  audit  and  risk  management  system,  and  to 
establish  a  reporting  and  monitoring  system  for  the  Board  of  Director  through  its  Audit 
Committee for monitoring such activity.  

The internal/management control system developed and implemented in  Romgaz targets the 
achievement of the following objectives: 

  compliance with legal regulation, with internal rules, with contracts and administrative 

and jurisdictional decisions applicable to the company’s activity; 
 
fulfilling Romgaz objectives under efficiency, economy and efficiency conditions; 
  protect  Romgaz  patrimony  against  losses  due  to  errors,  waste  of  money,  fraud  or 

abuse; 

  development  and  maintenance  of  collection,  storage,  processing,  updating  and 
distribution  of  financial  and  management  data  and  information,  as  well  as  of  proper 
systems/procedures to inform the public. 

Drafting,  implementation,  development  and  assessment  of  internal/management  control 
system  for  Romgaz  are  achieved  in  compliance  with  the  provisions  set  in  Government 

10 Public Finance Ministry Order no. 946 as of July 4, 2005 for the approval of Internal Control Code comprising 
internal/management control standards at public entities and for the development of internal/management 
systems; 
11 Government General Secretary Order No. 400/2015 for the approval of internal/management control systems 
of public entities; 
12  Government  General  Secretary  Order  No.  200  of  February  26/2016  on  amending  and  supplementing 
Government General Secretary Order No. 400 of June 12/2015 for the approval of internal/management control 
systems of public entities; 

Page 82 of 94 

 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Ordinance No. 119/199913 and with the standards provided by Order SGG No. 400/2015, 
supplemented with Order SGG No. 200/201614 grouped in five main categories: 

Category 

Control environment 

Risk management and 
performance 

Control activities 

Main aspects 

Company organization,  human resources  management,  ethics principles and 
rules, deontology and integrity  

Applicable  to  all  of  the  company’s  processes  and  activities,  targets  how 
objectives  were  set,  sets  risk  identification  methods  and  risk  management, 
planning 
(governing  plan  and 
(multiannual  planning), 
management plan) and performance monitoring 

scheduling 

Internal  procedures  are  documented  and  drafted  in  relation  to  the  main 
processes  so  that  the  initiation  and  verification  functions  separation  is 
maintained  in  order  to  mitigate  error  and  fraud  risk,  and  in  relation  to 
operation continuity by means of continuous supervision and management of 
deviations from set procedures 

Information and communication  Targets  the  creation  and  development  of  a  flexible  and  rapid  information 
information  quality  and  usage  of  proper 
system 
communication  methods  and  channels 
type. 
Development  of  reporting  system  for  the  implementation  of  the  governing 
and  management  plan,  entity  budget,  management  of  resources  use  and 
document. 

to  ensure  both 

information 

for  each 

Evaluation and audit  

Drafting  and  implementation  of  policies,  plans  and  schedules  for  the 
development  of  internal/management  control  in  terms  of  perfecting  such  by 
the  assessment  of  the  implementation  carried  out  by  the  internal  audit 
compartment  

Among the 2017 internal/management control system development/improvement actions we 
specify the following: 

  Romgaz adherence to the principles and fundamental values promoted by the National 
Anticorruption  Strategy  2016-2020  –  elaborate  the  Integrity  Plan  no.  70/24.02.2017 
posted  on  the  website  -    correlated  with  the  Development  Program  of  the  Internal 
Management Control for 2017; 

  Consulting  all  employees  to  identify  vulnerabilities  to  corruption  by  using  a 
questionnaire  drafted  by  the  Commission  responsible  for  implementing  the  National 
Anticorruption Strategy, according to report no. 7592/14.03.2017. 

  Identify sensitive positions and other positions considered to be exposed, especially  to 
corruption  and review the list  of employees occupying such positions,  the procedure 
being  approved  by  the  Director  General  in  report  no.  10815/12.04.2017  –  correlated 
with  the  National  Anticorruption  Strategy  2016-2020  and  the  requirements  of 
Standard  1  “Ethics,  integrity”  and  Standard  2  “Attributions,  positions  and  tasks” 
provided by Order no. 400/2015, supplemented by Order no. 200/2016; 

  The project on listing the vulnerabilities to corruption specific for company’s activities 
was submitted for review and endorsed by the Commission for monitoring the internal 
management system according to Protocol no. 29190/12.10.2017; 

13  Government  Ordinance  no.  119  as  of  August  31,  1999  regarding  internal  control  and  preventive  financial 
control 
14Government  General  Secretary  Order  No.  200/  February  26,  2016    regarding  the  amendment  and 
supplementation  of 
the  approval  of 
internal/management control systems of public entities; 

  Government  General  Secretary  Order  No.  400/2015 

for 

Page 83 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Prepare by the end of 2017 the “List with sensitive positions and/or exposed positions 

specially to corruption and the list with the persons occupying such positions; 

  Review  the  Internal  Rules  according  to  the  Decision  of  the  Director  General  no. 
259/21.01.2017 – amended and/or supplemented articles – “privileged information”; 

  Disseminate  informative  documents  in  order  to  raise  awareness  and  anticorruption 
education of all employees and correlated by enhanced activities for implementing the 
internal  management  system  to  all  managers  and  heads  of  departments.  PowerPoint 
presentations were send by email on September 28, 2017; 

  Update  procedure  PS-06  Communication  and  Instruction  00IL-061  External 
information  Communication  –  correlated  with  Standard  12  “Information  and 
Communication”  provided  by  Order  no.  400/2015,  supplemented  by  Order  no. 
200/2016; 

  Update  instruction  00IL-011  Document  archiving,  correlated  with  Standard  13 
“Document  management”    provided  by  Order  no.400/2015,  supplemented  by  Order 
no.200/2016; 

  Training  project  to  improve  risk  management,  therefrom  two  activity  fields  were 
selected, namely trading and purchase/investments. This project was  initiated in July 
2017 and is in progress; 

  Draft and update Romgaz Risk Register. 

According  to  the  self-assessment  results  for  the  implementation  of  Internal/Management 
Control System, in 2017 (in relation to the 16 internal/management control standards provided 
in  Order  no.  400/2015,  supplemented  by  Order  no.200/2016),  the  Internal/Management 
Control System is partially implemented. 

In  order  to  increase  the  quality  of  the  internal  control  activity  and  the  performance  of 
management act as regards the use of public resources, the following are recommended: 

  increase the managers responsibility as regards the organization of internal control 

and implementation of control findings; 

  supervising the systematic update of the procedures in terms of  legal changes and  

risks evolution;  

  coordinating the internal control system of the company with the risk management 

  supporting 

the  management 

in 

implementation  of 

the 

internal  auditors 

recommendations 

ensuring the consultancy requested by the management.

Romgaz’s Code of Conduct was prepared first in 2013.  

The  periodical  reports  on  the  indicators  relevant  for  compliance  with  the  rules  of  conduct 
have been prepared by the person responsible with monitoring the compliance of the Code of 
Conduct and have been posted on the intranet webpage of the Company.  

Subsequently,  considering  the  need  to  comply  with  the  legal  requirements  on  corporate 
governance,  internal  control  and  National  Anticorruption  Strategy,  the  company’s  executive 
management updated in 2017 the Code of Conduct. The updated document – SNGN Romgaz 

Page 84 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

SA Ethics and Integrity Code – was approved by the Director General in February 2018 and 
has to be ratified by the Board of Directors. 

The  most  important  amendments/supplements  of  this  Ethics  and  Integrity  Code  are  the 
following:  conflict  of  interests,  trade  of  company’s  shares,  compliance  with  laws  on 
competition,  integrity  insurance  and  preventing  corruption  deeds,  prevention  and  reporting 
frauds, money laundry etc. 

Romgaz activities in  the field  of social responsibility  are performed voluntarily, beyond the 
legal responsibilities, the company being aware of its role in society.  

Social responsibility means for Romgaz a business culture including business ethics, customer 
rights,  economic  and  social  equity,  environmental  friendly  technologies,  fair  treatment  of 
workforce, transparent relationship with the public authorities, moral integrity and investment 
in the community. 

Moreover,  Romgaz  supports  a  sustainable  development  of  the  society  and  community, 
through financial support/ total or partial sponsorship for some actions  and initiatives in the 
following main domains: education, social, sport, health and environment. 

Granting  financial  support/partial  or  total  sponsorship  for  actions  and  initiatives,  within  the 
budgeted limits, Romgaz has shown a pro-active attitude of social responsibility and increased 
the  awareness  of  the  parties  involved  as  regards  to  the  importance  and  benefits  of  social 
responsibility actions. 

In  2017,  Romgaz  supported,  totally  or  partially,  actions  and  initiatives  stipulated  in  
Government  Emergency  Ordinance  (“GEO”)  no.2/2015,  complying  with  the  budget,  as 
follows: 

Expenses/activities  

Total of sponsorship expenses, out of which 

Expenses with sponsorships in medical and health domains - Article.XIV letter.a) 

Expenses with sponsorships in education and sport domains – Article XIV letter.b) – 
total, out of which: 
For Sports Clubs 

Sponsorships for other actions and activities - Article.XIV letter.c) 

Achieved (RON) 

7,731,870 

2,589,632 

3,884,848 

3,450,920 

1,257,390 

The  detailed  description  of  the  projects  as  regards  the  sponsorship  provided  in  GEO 
no.2/2015 is included in the Annual Report on Social Responsibility and Patronage for 2017 
published  on  www.romgaz.ro  at  “Investor  Relations  -  Corporate  Governance  -  Social 
Responsibility”. 

The  projects  carried  out  in  2017  had  besides  the  positive  impact  on  the  environment  and 
community, an important benefit for the company by inspiring the organisational culture and 
the goodwill being a responsible employer, and also an involved social partner, promotor of a 
transparent and open relationship. This is positively reflected in Romgaz image, domestically 
and internationally, both for investors, central and local authorities and for other stakeholders. 

When supporting/performing projects, actions, social responsibility initiatives, Romgaz took 
into consideration the provisions of Sponsorship Policy and Sponsorship Guide applicable in 
2017, published on the company’s website at Social Responsibility.  
(https://www.romgaz.ro/en/content/social-responsibility-0 ) 

Page 85 of 94 

 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

Legal Framework 

The  politics  and  remuneration  criteria  of  the  executive  and  non-executive  members  of  the 
Board of Directors are based on the following norms: 

  Law no. 31/1990 on trading companies, as subsequently amended and supplemented; 
  GEO  no.  109/2011  on  corporate  governance  of  public  enterprises,  as  subsequently 

amended and supplemented, approved by Law no.111/2016; 

  The  company’s  Articles  of  Incorporation,  approved  by  the  Extraordinary  General 
Meeting  of  Shareholders    no.  9/October  28,  2016  and  no.4/  August  9,  2017  (last 
update of the Articles of Incorporation); 

  Resolution no. 14/August 26, 2013 of the Ordinary General Meeting of  Shareholders 
which  established  the  general  limits  of  the  remuneration  of  the  director  general, 
executive member of the Board of Directors; 

  Resolution  no.  29/December  16,  2013  of  the  Board  of  Directors  approving  the 

Mandate Contract of the Director General;  

  OGMS Resolutions no. 12/26.07.2013 and no. 13/30.12.2016 approving  the Director 

Agreements for Board members; 

  Resolution no.14/07.06.2017 on the 4 year renewal of the Director General Contract of 

Mandate; 

  Resolution  no.35/14.12.2017  approving  the  contract  of  mandate  that  is  going  to  be 

concluded with the Chief Financial Officer. 

For    compliance  with  the  Requirements  of  BVB  Corporate  Governance  Code  and  GEO  no. 
109/2011, Romgaz drafted the Policy on remuneration which shall be submitted for approval 
of the Board of Directors.   

The structure of the remuneration granted to non-executive directors 

The  fixed  monthly  remuneration  as  well  as  the  variable  one  were  established  according  to 
applicable legal  provisions  (detailed in  the  2017Annual  Report on remunerations and other 
benefits granted to SNGN Romgaz SA directors and managers ) and provided in the Director 
Agreement of each directors, as approved by the applicable GMS resolution.  

The following criteria are relevant for the fixed remuneration for 2017: 

  The Chairman and Board members who are at least on two (2) advisory committees 

benefit from a fixed maximum monthly remuneration; 

  Board  members  who  are  at  least  on  one  (1)  advisory  committee  benefitted  from  a 

monthly fixed allowance of 90% of the fixed maximum monthly remuneration; 

  Board members who do not  belong to any advisory committee benefit from a fixed 
monthly remuneration representing 85% of the fixed maximum monthly allowance. 

The following criteria are relevant for the variable remuneration for 2017: 

Page 86 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

  Part  of  the  directors  that  carried  on  activities  in  2017  received  strictly  a  fixed 

allowance, while another part received remuneration also; 

  Variable  remuneration  was  set  depending  on  the  achievement  of  objectives,  namely 
fulfilment  of  the  performance  indicators  target  value,  that  were  set  in  the  director 
agreement and approved by the GMS in 2013 Governing Plan; 

  The  value  of  the  variable  remuneration  of  non-executive  board  members  did  not 

exceed the value of 12 monthly fixed remunerations.  

The variable remuneration is made up of two (2) components, a first component depending on 
the  fulfilment  of  performance  indicators  determined  quarterly,  by  considering  the  share  of 
each  indicator  and  the  variation  from  the  target  level,  and  the  second  one  depends  on  the 
exceeding value by a percentage higher than 0.4% of the achieved net profit  as compared to 
the  one  approved  in  the  company’s  income  and  expenditure  budget,  namely  the  amount 
representing the difference between the actual achieved net profit and the estimated net profit 
for every financial year, but not higher than the value of the annual fixed allowance. 

The  structure  of  the  remuneration  granted  to  the  executive  director,  namely  Director 
General 

While acting as executive member of the Board of Directors, the Director General concluded 
both a director agreement for the membership in the Board and a contract of mandate for the 
position  as  Director  General.  The  Director  General  was  entitled  strictly  to  payment  of  the 
remuneration according to the contract of mandate. 

The structure of the remuneration granted to managers 

The monthly fixed remuneration, as well as the variable remuneration were granted under the 
legal applicable provisions (detailed in the Annual Report on remunerations and other benefits 
granted to SNGN Romgaz SA directors and managers), such being provided in the Contract 
of mandate of each manager, approved by Board resolutions. 
As regards solely the Director General the variable remuneration was granted considering the 
fulfilment of objectives and performance indicators. In 2017 the interim Director General and 
the Chief Financial Officer did not benefit from the variable remuneration. 

2017, that will be public on the company’s website by the end of June 2018, according to the 
Order of the Ministry for Public Finances no. 2844/201615 (chapter 7, item 42, para (1)). 

 Romgaz prepares a separate report for financial year 

15 Order of the Ministry of Public Finances no.2844 of December 12, 2016 on approving Accounting 
Regulations compliant with the International Financial Reporting Standards 

Page 87 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The timeline of the directors agreements, the contract of mandate, the Governing Plan and the 
Management  Plan is the following: 

  June  12,  2013  –  The  Board  of  Directors’  Resolution  no. 8 approves  the appointment of 

“Mr. Virgil Marius Metea as executive director - Director General”; 

  July 26, 2013 – GSM Resolution no. 12 approves the Director Agreement to be concluded 

with the members of the Board of Directors; 

  September  25,  2013  –  GSM  Resolution  no.  16  approves  the Governing  Plan  2013-2017 

prepared and presented by the Board of Directors; 

  December  16,  2013  –    Board’s  Resolution  no.  29  approves  the  Contract  of  Mandate 
between Romgaz and Mr. Virgil Marius Metea as executive director-Director General. 

  January  29,  2014  –  Board’s  Resolution  no.  1  approves  the  “Management  Plan  of 

Romgaz’s Director General over the mandate contract’s term i.e. 2013-2017”. 

  November  15,  2016  -  By  Resolution  no.10,  the  Board  of  Directors  revoked  Mr.  Virgil 

Marius Metea from the position of executive director.  

  December  30,    2016  –  by  Resolution  no.13,  the  General  Meeting  of  Shareholders 
approved the Directors Agreement which shall be concluded with the new members of the 
Board of Directors.  

  April 25, 2017 – GMS Resolution no.1 appointed as interim directors: Mr. Stan Bogdan 
Nicolae,  Mr.  Chirila  Alexandru,  Mr.  Gheorghe  Gheorghe  Gabriel  and  Mr.  Metea  Virgil 
Marius and approved the director agreement; 

  June  7,  2017  –  Board’s  Resolution  no.  14  decided  upon  the  renewal  of  the  Director 

General contract of mandate – Mr. Metea Virgil Marius ; 

  September 7, 2017 – GMS Resolution no.5 appointed as interim directors: Mr. Gheorghe 
Gheorghe Gabriel, Mr. Stan Bogdan Nicolae, Mr. Ciobanu Romeo Cristian, Mr. Nistoran 
Dorin Liviu, Mr. Ceremonea Ioan Daniel, Mr. Grigorescu Remus and Mrs. Baciu Sorana 
Rodica and approves the director agreement; 

  November  2,  2017  –  Board’s  Resolution  no.30  appointed  Mr.  Bobar  Andrei  as  Chief 
Financial  Officer.  The  contract  of  mandate  was  concluded  for  4  months,  starting  with 
November 2, 2017, it will be automatically extended for successive periods of 4 months 
until  the  appointment  of  a  Board  of  Directors,  whose  members  will  be  selected  in 
compliance  with  GEO  no.  109/2011.  Thereafter  the  Board  of  Directors  will  set  the 
performance indicators and objectives based on the Management Plan, as well as the term 
of the mandate. 

  December  14,  2017 –  Board’s  Resolution  no.35  approved the contract of mandate to be 
concluded with the Chief Financial Officer, appointed by Resolution no.30 of November 
2, 2017; 

  December 14, 2017 – Board’s Resolution no.36 revoked the mandate of Mr. Metea Virgil 

Marius as director general; 

  December  14,  2017  –  Board’s  Resolution  no.37  appointed  Mr.  Cindrea  Corin  Emil    as 
interim  director  general  for  a  4  month  term,  with  the  possibility  to  be  extended  up  to 
maximum 6 months. 

Page 88 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

“SNGN Romgaz SA Governing Plan for 2013-2017” was approved by Resolution no. 16 of 
September 25, 2013  of the General Meeting of Shareholders. 

“The  Contract  of  Mandate  of  SNGN  Romgaz  SA  Director  General”  was  approved  by  the 
Board  of  Directors  Resolution  no.29  of  December  16,  2013  and  became  effective  “starting 
with  June  17,  2013”  according  to  the  same  resolution.  The  contract  of  mandate  was 
concluded for a 4 year term.  

“The  Management  Plan  for  the  term  of  SNGN  Romgaz  SA  Director  General  mandate, 
namely for 2013-2017” – was approved by the Board of Directors Resolution no.1 of January 
29, 2014. 

The  Management  Plan  encloses  the  vision  of  the  Director  General  for  the  fulfilment  of  the 
strategic  objectives  as  provided  in  the  Governing  Plan  and  the  achievement  of  performance 
criteria and objectives. 

Therefore,  the  performance  criteria  and  objectives  set  in  the  Director  Agreement  are 
performance criteria and objectives of the director general activity.  

The main performance objectives provided in the director agreement and in the management 
contract may be summarized as follows:  

  Increasing the company’s gas resources and gas reserves portfolio by discovering new 
resources and by developing and improving the recovery degree of already discovered 
resources; 

  Consolidating the company’s position on the electricity supply market; 
  Optimizing,  developing  and  diversifying  the  underground  storage  activity  by 
reconsidering its importance for ensuring safety, continuity and flexibility in supplying 
natural gas; 

  Increasing the company’s performance; 

  Identifying of new growth and diversification opportunities; 

  Improving  the  company’s  organization  structure,  including  the  reorganization  of  the 

internal audit function. 

Besides  the  specific  measures  for  fulfilling  each  objective,  the  company  proposed  to 
implement  general  measures  that  will  also  contribute  to  the  fulfilment  of  the  company’s 
strategic objectives, in the following areas: 
  Human resources management; 

  Corporate governance and social responsibility; 

  Optimization of budgeting and control process; 

  Improving the company’s image; 

  Implementation of legal provisions on legal separation of UGS activity; 

  Developing the role of the company’s risk management. 

The  measures  and  actions  for  the  fulfilment  of  strategic  objectives,  as  set  in  the  Governing  
Plan,  are  monitored  periodically,  quarterly  and  annually  by  the  following  indicators  and 
performance criteria: 

Page 89 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

No. 

0 

1.  EBITDA 

2.  Revenue 

Indicator 

M.U. 

1 

2 

thousand 
RON 

thousand 
RON 

Performance 
criterion 

Indicator 

Weighting 
coefficient 

3 

4 

increasing 

4.50%/year 

5 

0.25 

increasing 

6%/ year 

0.20 

3.  Labour productivity 

RON/person 

increasing 

6%/ year 

4.  OPEX 

to  RON  1000 
(op. 

operating 
income 
expense/op. income) 

RON 

decreasing 

0.60%/ year 

5.  Geological resources 

million m3 

increasing 

1%/ year 

6.  Natural  gas  production 

% 

keeping stable 

1.5%/ year 

decline 

7.  Outstanding payments 

thousand 
RON 

keeping stable 

0 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.15 

0.10 

With the expiration of the  4  year director  agreements  of directors appointed by the General 
Meeting of Shareholders in 2013, interim directors were successively appointed, they have no 
performance indicators and criteria included in the director agreements approved by the GMS. 

The Board of Directors approved by Resolution no.14 of June 7, 2017 besides the renewal of   
Mr. Metea Virgil Marius contract of mandate as – Director General, also the modification of 
the performance indicators’ value for 2017 as those approved by the GMS in the income and 
expenditure budget. 

The  Board  of  Directors  revoked  by  Resolution  no.36  of  December  14,  2016  the  director 
general mandate of Mr. Metea Virgil Marius.  

The  Board  appoints  by  resolution  no.37  of  December  14,  2017  Mr.  Cindrea  Corin  Emil  as 
interim  director  general  for  a  4  month  term,  with  the  possibility  to  be  extended  up  to 
maximum 6 months. 

The  contract  of  mandate  concluded  by  the  Director  General  with  the  Board  included  no 
performance indicators and criteria.  

Likewise, the contract of mandate concluded by the Chief Financial Officer Mr. Bobar Andrei 
with  the  Board  included  no  performance  indicators  and  criteria.  These  will  be  set  in  an 
addendum by the Board of Directors that will be appointed further to the selection procedure 
compliant with GEO no.109/2011, based on the management plan.  

Page 90 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

The achievement of performance indicators and criteria of directors who had such included in 
their director agreements and whose contracts expired in 2017 are shown in the table below: 

9 months 2017 

Weighting 
factor 

Indicator 

2 

3 

Average 
values  9 
months 
2014-
2016 
4 

Target 
values 

Achieved 
values 

Achievement 
rate 

Weight 

1 
EBITDA 
CA 
W 
Cexpl/Vexpl 
RES 
dQ 
Pres 
Total 

EBITDA  
CA  
W  
Cexpl/Vexpl  
RES  
dQ  
Pres  

5 

6 

7=6/5x100 

0.25 
0.20 
0.10 
0.10 
0.10 
0.15 
0.10 
1.00 

+4.5%  1,908,812.5  1,994,709.1  1,826,043.5 
+6%  2,873,798.6  3,046,226.5  3,241,648.5 
535.5 
+6% 
582.8 
-0.6% 
1.267.0 
+1% 
3.751.1 
-1.5% 
0 
0 

493.3 
577.0 
1.895.4 
3.899.616 
0 

465.4 
580.5 
1.876.7 
3.959.0 
0 

91.5 
106.4 
108.5 
99.0 
66.8 
96.2 
110.0 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

– (RON thousand); 
– revenue (RON thousand); 
– labour productivity (RON thousand/employee); 
– operating expenses to1000 RON operating income; 
– volume of geological resources (million m3); 
– gas production decline (%); 
– outstanding payments (thousand RON). 

8=2x7 
22.88 
21.28 
10.85 
9.90 
6.68 
14.43 
11.00 
97.02 

The performance criteria and objectives achievement degree is 97.02%. 

The achievement of the performance indicators and criteria was positively influenced by: 

  Revenue – higher than the target by RON 195.4 million (+6.4%); 
  Labour productivity – higher than targeted by 42.2 thousand RON/employee (+8.5%); 
  Outstanding payments. 

The following indicators were not fully achieved: 

  EBITDA –lower by RON 168.67 million (-8.5 %) compared to target value; 
  Operating  expenses  to  RON  1000  operating  income  –  higher  by  RON  5.8  (+1%) 

compared to target value; 

  Volume of geological resources – lower by 628.4 million m3 (-33.2%); 
  Natural gas production – lower by 148.5 million m3 

16 Production of 2012 corrected with the target decline of 1.5%, 2012 being considered  “base year”. 

Page 91 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

2017 Total  

Weighting 
factor 

Indicator 

1 
EBITDA 
CA 
W 
Cexpl/Vexpl 
RES 
dQ 
Pres 
Total 

2 

0.25 
0.20 
0.10 
0.10 
0.10 
0.15 
0.10 
1.00 

3 

+4.5% 
+6% 
+6% 
-0.6% 
+1% 
-1.5% 
0 

- 

Average 
values  
2014-
2016 
4 
2,481,269.9 
3,985,964.2 
645.5 
597.6 
2.461 
5.331.1 
0 

Target 
values 

Achieved 
values 

Achievement 
rate 

Weight 

5 
2,592,927 
4,225,122 
684.2 
594.0 
2.485.6 
5.251.117 
0 

6 
2,810,436 
4,585,189 
758.4 
548.7 
1.282 
5.157.5 
0 

7=6/5x100 

8=2x7 

108.4 
108.5 
110.8 
108.3 
51.6 
98.2 
110.0 

27.10 
21.70 
11.08 
10.83 
5.16 
14.73 
11.00 
101.60 

- 

- 

- 

- 

The performance criteria and objectives achievement degree is 101.60%. 

The achievement of the performance indicators and criteria was mainly influenced by: 

  EBITDA – higher by RON 217.5 million (+8.4%) compared to target value; 

  Revenue – higher by RON 360.1 million (+8.5%) compared to target value; 

  Labour productivity – higher than targeted by 74.2 thousand RON/employee (+10.8%); 

  Operating  expenses  to  RON  1000  operating  income  –  lower  by  RON  45.3  (-7.6%) 

compared to target value; 

  Volume of geological resources  – lower by 1,203 million m3 (-48.4%); 
  Gas production decline – lower by 93.6 million m3 compared to target value. 

The Board of Directors sets by Resolution no.14 on June 7, 2017 “the performance indicators 
for the Director General approved in the Board meeting on 23.03.2017”. 

Addendum  no.5  to  the  Contract  of  Mandate  was  concluded  subject  to  Board  Resolution 
no.14/2017, registered under no. 17702 of June 15, 2017. 

By  Resolution  no.36  of  December  14,  2017  the  Board  revoked  the  mandate  as  director 
general of Mr. Metea Virgil Marius.  

The  Board  appointed  by  Resolution  37  of  December  14,  2017  Mr.  Cindrea  Emil  Corin  as 
interim  director  general  for  a  4  month  term,  with  the  possibility  to  be  extended  up  to 
maximum 6 months, in compliance with the law. The contract of mandate concluded by the 
Director General with the Board included no performance indicators and criteria.  

The fulfilment of the performance criteria and objectives is shown in the table below: 

17 Production of 2012 corrected with the target decline of 1.5%, 2012 being considered  “base year”. 

Page 92 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ Report 2017 

1 
EBITDA 

CA 

W 

M. U. 

2 
thousand 
RON 

thousand 
RON 

thousand 
RON 

Performance 
criterion 
3 
increasing 

Weighting 
factor 

4 
0.25 

Target 
values18 
5 
1,925,007 

Achieved 
values 
6 
2,810,436 

Achievement 
rate  
7=6/5x100 
146.0 

Weight  

8=2x7 
36.50 

increasing 

0.20 

3,801,946 

4,585,189 

120.6 

24.12 

increasing 

0.10 

602.53 

758.38 

125.9 

12.59 

Cexpl/Vexpl 

RON 

RES 

dQ 

Pres 

Total 

million 
m3 

million 
m3 
- 

decreasing 

increasing 

keeping stable 

keeping stable 

- 

0.10 

0.10 

0.15 

0.10 

1.00 

653.21 

2,500.0 

548.68 

1,282.0 

4,751 

5,158 

0 

- 

0 

- 

119.1 

51.3 

108.6 

110.0 

- 

11.91 

5.13 

16.29 

11.00 

117.54 

The performance criteria and objectives achievement degree is 117.54%. 

The achievement of the performance indicators and criteria was positively influenced by: 

  EBITDA – higher than targeted by RON 885 million (+46%); 

  Revenue – higher by RON 783 million (+20.6%); 

  Labour productivity – higher than targeted by 155.9 thousand RON/employee  (+25.9%); 

  Operating  expenses  to  RON  1000  operating  income  –  lower  by  RON  104.5  (-16%) 

compared to target value; 

  Natural gas production – higher by 406.5 million m3 ; 

  Outstanding payments. 

Only “the volume of geological resources” was not fully achieved – lower by 1,218 million 
m3 (-48.7%). 

18Represents the values approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders  Resolution no.1 of April 25, 2017  

Page 93 of 94 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                           
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report   

        Annex 1 

Table of Compliance with the Bucharest Stock Exchange Code of Corporate 
Governance 

Code provisions 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

Reasons for non-compliance     

3 

4 

2 
x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

A.1 

A.2 

1 

All  the  companies  must  have  an 
Internal  Regulation  of  BoD  that 
includes  the  reference  terms/  the 
responsibilities of the Board and the 
company’s 
management 
key 
positions,  and  that  applies,  among 
others,  the  General  Principles  in 
section A.   

interest  stating 

The ToR of the BoD should include 
provisions  for  the  management  of 
that 
conflict  of 
members of the Board should notify 
any conflicts of interest which have 
arisen or may arise to the Board and 
should  refrain  from  taking  part  in 
the  discussion  (including  by  not 
being  present  where  this  does  not 
render the meeting non-quorate) and 
from  voting  on  the  adoption  of  a 
resolution  on  the  issue  which  gives 
rise to such a conflict of interest. 

A.3 

The BoD has at least five members 

A.4 

The majority of the members of the 
BoD is non-executive; not less than 
two  non-executive  members  of  the 
BoD must be independent. 

A.5 

Each  independent  member  of  the 
BoD must submit a statement at the 
time  of  his/her  nomination  for 
election  or  re-election,  as  well  as 
whenever a change in his/her status 
occurs,  indicating  the  elements  on 
which  it  is  deemed  independent  in 
terms  of 
its  character  and  his 
judgment. 
A  Board  member’s  other  relatively 
professional 
permanent 
commitments  and  engagements, 
non-
including 
executive 
executive  Board 
in 
non-profit 
and 
companies 
organizations,  should  be  disclosed 
to  shareholders  and  to  potential 
investors prior to his/her nomination 
and during his/her mandate. 

and 
positions 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

Reasons for non-compliance     

2 
x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

A.6 

A.7 

A.8 

A.9 

A.10 

A.11 

1 

Any  member  of  the  BoD  should 
submit to the Board information on 
any  relationship  with  a  shareholder 
who  holds,  directly  or  indirectly, 
shares  representing  more  than  5% 
of  all  voting  rights.  This  also 
applies  to  any  report  which  may 
affect  the  member's  position  on 
matters decided by the Council. 

The  company  should  appoint  a 
for 
responsible 
Board  secretary 
supporting the work of the BoD 

or 

the 

The corporate governance statement 
should 
inform  on  whether  an 
evaluation  of  the  Board  has  taken 
place  under  the  leadership  of  the 
chairman 
nomination 
committee and, if it has, summarize 
key  action  points  and  changes 
resulting  from  it.  The  company 
should  have  a  policy/guidance 
regarding the evaluation of the BoD 
containing  the  purpose,  criteria  and 
frequency of the evaluation process. 

by 

attendance 

The corporate governance statement 
should  contain  information  on  the 
number  of  meetings  of  the  Board 
and  the  committees  during  the  past 
directors 
year, 
(personally  and  in  their  absence) 
and  a  report  of  the  Board  and 
committees on their activities. 
The corporate governance statement 
should  contain  information  on  the 
precise  number  of  the  independent 
members of the Board of Directors. 

set  up 

a 
should 
The  BoD 
nomination  committee  formed  of 
non-executives,  which  will  lead  the 
process for Board appointments and 
the 
recommendations 
make 
Board.  

to 

The majority of the members of the 
nomination  committee  should  be 
independent 

3 

4 

x partially 

The  section  on  Statement  on 
corporate  governance 
the 
Annual Board of Directors’ Report 
includes 
the 
statements 
evaluation of the BoD. 

on 

in 

the  Policy 
Romgaz  prepared 
regarding evaluation and it will be 
submitted  for  the  approval  of  the 
Board  in  a  meeting  subsequent  to 
this statement.  

Following  the  approval  it  will  be 
published on the company website. 

Page 2 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
  
  
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

B.1 

The  Board  should  set  up  an  Audit 
Committee and at least one member 
independent  non-
should  be  an 
executive.  

The  Audit  Committee  should  be 
formed  of  at  least  three  members 
should  be 
and 
independent. 

the  majority 

have 

proven 

The majority of members, including 
the  chairman,  should  have  proven 
an adequate qualification relevant to 
the  functions and responsibilities of 
the  Committee.  At 
least  one 
member  of  the  Audit  Committee 
should 
and 
a 
appropriate accounting and auditing 
experience. 
The  President 
of 
the  Audit 
an 
should 
Committee 
independent non-executive member. 
Among 
the 
Audit  Committee  should  undertake 
an annual assessment of the internal 
control system. 

responsibilities, 

be 

its 

audit 

should 

consider 

function, 

The  provision  mentioned  in  section 
the 
B.3 
the 
effectiveness  and  scope  of 
internal 
the 
adequacy  of  risk  management  and 
internal control reports to the Audit 
Committee  of 
the  Board,  and 
management’s  responsiveness  and 
dealing  with 
in 
effectiveness 
identified internal control failings or 
weaknesses  and  submit  relevant 
reports to the Board. 
should 
The  Audit  Committee 
review  conflicts  of 
in 
transactions of the company  and its 
subsidiaries with affiliated parties. 

interests 

B.2 

B.3 

B.4 

B.5 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

Reasons for non-compliance     

3 

4 

2 
x 

x 

 x partially 

The  responsibility  for  monitoring 
the effectiveness of the company’s 
internal  control,  internal  audit  and 
risk  management 
is 
specified  in  the  ToR  of  the  Audit 
Committee. 

systems 

 x partially 

See section B.3 

x partially 

provision 

already 
This 
mentioned  under  Art.  8,  par.  2  of 
CCG ROMGAZ. 

is 

the  BoD 

The  ToR  of  the  Audit  Committee 
the 
approved  by 
meeting  of  March  24,  2016 
contains  provisions  in  relation  to 
this obligation.  

in 

During 2017, the ToR of the Audit 
Committee  has  been  revised  to 
include 
the 
provisions 
evaluation of conflict of interest in 
connection  with  the  Company’s 
transactions  with 
the  affiliated 
parties.  

on 

The 

updated  ToR  will 

be 

Page 3 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Reasons for non-compliance     

4 
submitted for approval of BoD in a 
meeting 
this 
subsequent 
statement.  

to 

Also,  during  2017  Romgaz  has 
developed  a  Policy  on  affiliated 
parties  and  the  document  will  be 
submitted for approval of the BoD 
in  a  meeting  subsequent  to  this 
statement.  

Following  the  approval  it  will  be 
published on the company website. 
The  responsibility  for  monitoring 
the effectiveness of the company’s 
internal  control  systems,  internal 
audit 
risk  management 
systems is specified in the ToR of 
the Audit Committee. 

and 

For  2017,  the  Audit  Committee 
performed  the  annual  assessment 
of the risk management system.  

Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

2 

3 

B.6 

should 
The  Audit  Committee 
evaluate 
the 
internal  control  system  and  risk 
management system 

the  efficiency  of 

x partially 

B.7 

B.8 

B.9 

The  Audit  Committee 
should 
monitor  the  application  of  statutory 
and generally accepted standards of 
auditing.  The  Audit 
internal 
Committee 
receive  and 
should 
evaluate  the  reports  of  the  internal 
audit team.  
The Audit Committee should report 
periodically  (at  least  annually)  or 
adhoc  to  BoD  with  regard  to  the 
reports  or  analyzes  undertaken  by 
the committee. 
No shareholder may be given undue 
preference  over  other  shareholders 
transactions  and 
with  regard 
agreements  made  by  the  company 
with  shareholders  and  their  related 
parties 

to 

x 

x 

x 

Page 4 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

2 

3 

B.10 

The  BoD  should  adopt  a  policy 
ensuring  that  any  transaction  of  the 
company with any of the companies 
with which it has close relations that 
is equal to or higher than 5% of the 
company’s  net  assets  (as  stated  in 
the  latest  financial  report),  should 
be approved by the Board following 
a  mandatory  opinion  of  the  Audit 
Committee  and  fairly  disclosed  to 
shareholders  and  potential 
the 
such 
investors, 
transactions  fall  under  the  category 
of  events  subject 
to  disclosure 
requirements. 

the  extent 

to 

B.11 

B.12 

internal  audits  should  be 
The 
carried  out  by  a  separate  structural 
division  (internal  audit  department) 
within  the  company  or  by  retaining 
an independent third-party entity 
The 
Internal  Audit  Department 
should  functionally  report  to  the 
BoD  via  the  Audit  Committee.  For 
administration  purposes  and  for  the 
scope  related  to  the  obligations  of 
the  management  to  monitor  and 
mitigate  risks,  the  Internal  Audit 
Department should report directly to 
the Director General. 

x 

x 

Reasons for non-compliance     

4 
provision 

is 

will 

The 
already 
mentioned  under  Art.  9  of  CCG 
be 
and 
ROMGAZ 
implemented  by  the  Policy  for 
transactions  with  affiliated  parties 
which  will  be  submitted 
for 
approval  to  the  BoD  in  a  meeting 
subsequent to its drafting. 

x 

Following the approval, the policy 
will  be  published  on  the  company 
website. 

Page 5 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

2 

3 

The  company  should  publish  on  its 
website  the  Remuneration  Policy. 
The  Remuneration  Policy  must  be 
to  allow 
the 
formulated  so  as 
to  understand 
shareholders 
the 
principles 
arguments 
and 
underlying  the  remuneration  of  the 
members  of  the  Board  and  of  the 
General  Director.  Any  significant 
change 
the 
Remuneration  Policy  must  be 
posted in due time on the company's 
website. 

occurred 

in 

x partially 

The  company  must  include  in  its 
Annual  Report  a  statement  on  the 
implementation  of 
this  Policy 
during 
the  annual  period  under 
review. 

The  Report  on  Remuneration  must 
present  the  implementation  of  the 
Remuneration  Policy  for  persons 
identified  in  this  Policy  during  the 
annual period under review. 

C.1 

D.1 

Reasons for non-compliance     

4 
provision 

The 
already 
mentioned under Art. 11, par. 5 of 
CCG ROMGAZ. 

is 

Statement 
in 

on 
The 
section 
corporate  governance 
the 
Annual Board of Directors’ Report 
includes  statements  regarding  the 
the 
implementation 
Remuneration  Policy  and 
the 
the  Board  of 
remuneration  of 
the 
Directors  members  and  of 
directors. 

of 

separate 

document 

A 
on 
Remuneration  Policy  was  drafted 
and 
it  will  be  submitted  for 
approval  to  the  BoD  in  a  meeting 
subsequent to its drafting. 

Following the approval, the policy 
will  be  published  on  the  company 
website. 

is 

Report 

Annual 

on 
The 
Remuneration 
presented 
together with the Annual Board of 
Directors’  Report. 
It  presents 
details of the principles applied for 
the  determination  of  the  Board 
Members and directors. 

to 

the  public 

The  company  should  establish  an 
Investors  Relation  Department  - 
the 
indicating 
responsible  person/persons  or  the 
organizational unit.  
Besides the information required by 
the  legal  provisions,  the  company 
should also include on its corporate 
website 
Investor 
Relations section, both in Romanian 
and  English,  with  all  the  relevant 
information of interest for investors, 
including: 

dedicated 

a 

D.1.1  Principal  corporate  regulations:  the 
articles  of  incorporation,  general 
meeting of shareholders procedure 

D.1.2  Professional CVs of the members of 
the  company’s  governing  bodies, 
other  professional  commitments  of 
Board 
including 
executive  and  non-executive  Board 
positions  in  companies  and  non-

member’s, 

x 

x 

x partially 

Items on the GMS organization are 
presented  to  shareholders  at  each 
meeting.  

A  separate  document  on  the  GMS 
Procedure and Rules was prepared 
in  2017  and  it  will  be  submitted 
for  BoD  approval  in  a  meeting 
subsequent  to  this  statement  of 
conformity. 

Page 6 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

profit organizations. 

for 

D.1.4 

D.1.3  Current reports and periodic reports 
(quarterly,  semi-annual  and  annual 
reports) – at least those specified in 
Note  D.8-  including  current  reports 
with  detailed  information  related  to 
non-compliance  with  the  Bucharest 
Stock  Exchange  Code  of  Corporate 
Governance 
Information  related  to  GMS:  the 
agenda  and  supporting  materials; 
the 
the  procedure  approved  for 
the 
election  of  BoD  members, 
rationale 
the  proposal  of 
candidates  for  the  election  to  the 
with 
Board 
their 
professional  CVs; 
shareholders’ 
questions  related  to  the  agenda  and 
the  company’s  answers,  inclusively 
the decisions taken by the GMS 
Information  on  corporate  events 
(such  as  payment  of  dividends  and 
other  distributions  to  shareholders, 
or  other  events 
the 
acquisition or limitation of rights of 
the 
a 
deadlines  and  principles  applicable 
to such operations. 
The  information  will  be  published 
within  a  period  of  time  allowing 
investment 
investors 
decisions. 

shareholder) 

including 

together 

leading 

D.1.5 

take 

to 

to 

D.1.6  The  names  and  contact  data  of  the 
persons  who  should  be  able  to 
provide  knowledgeable  information 
on request; 
D.1.7  Corporate 

financial 

presentations 

(for 
example presentations for investors, 
presentations  on  quarterly  results 
etc.), 
statements 
(quarterly,  semi-annual,  annual), 
audit reports and annual reports 
The company will have a policy for 
annual cash distribution of dividend 
or  other  benefits  for  shareholders, 
proposed  by  the  Director  General 
and  adopted  by  the  BoD  as  the 
company’s  Guideline  on  net  profits 
distribution. 
The  principles  of 
the  annual 
distribution  of  dividends  policy  to 
Shareholders  will  be  published  on 
the company’s website. 

D.2 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

Reasons for non-compliance     

3 

4 

2 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

Page 7 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

Reasons for non-compliance     

D.3 

D.4 

D.5 

D.6 

D.7 

D.8 

D.9 

D.10 

1 

The  company  shall  adopt  a  policy 
with  respect  to  forecasts,  whether 
they  are  made  public  or  not.  The 
Policy  on  forecasts  will  determine 
the forecasts’ frequency, period and 
content and will be published on the 
company’s website. 
GSM  rules  should  not  restrict  the 
participation  of  shareholders 
in 
general meetings and the exercising 
of  their  rights.  The  modification  of 
rules  will  become  effective  no 
sooner 
following 
the 
shareholders’ meeting. 
The  external  auditors  should  attend 
the  shareholders’  meetings  when 
their reports are presented there. 

than 

subject 

professional, 
financial 
in 

The  BoD  should  present  to  the 
GMS  a  brief  assessment  of  the 
internal controls and significant risk 
management  system,  as  well  as 
opinions  on 
to 
issues 
resolution at the general meeting. 
consultant, 
Any 
analyst,  may 
expert, 
participate 
the  shareholders’ 
meeting  upon  prior  invitation  from 
the BoD.  
journalists  may  also 
Accredited 
attend 
the 
Chairman  of  the  Board  decides 
otherwise. 
semi-annual 
The  quarterly  and 
financial  reports  should 
include 
information  in  both,  Romanian  and 
English,  regarding  the  key  drivers 
influencing  the  change  in  sales, 
operating profit, net profit and other 
relevant  financial  indicators,  both 
on  quarter-on-quarter  and  year-on-
year terms. 

the  GMS,  unless 

time 

The  company  should  organize  at 
least  two  meetings/conference  calls 
with  analysts  and  investors  each 
year.  The  information  presented  on 
these occasions should be published 
on  the  company  website  in  the  IR 
section 
of 
the 
at 
meetings/teleconferences. 
If  the  company  supports  various 
forms  of  artistic  and  cultural 
expression, 
activities, 
sport 
educational  or  scientific  activities, 
and  considers  the  resulting  impact 
on 
and 
competitiveness  of  the  company  is 
part  of  its  business  mission  and 

innovativeness 

the 

2 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

3 

4 

External  auditors  are  invited  to 
attend  GMS  meetings  when  their 
reports  are  presented 
in  said 
meeting. 

Page 8 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Board of Directors’ 2017 Report 2017 

Code provisions 

1 

Complies  

Does not comply or 
partially complies  

2 

3 

Reasons for non-compliance     

4 

development  strategy, 
publish 
activity in this area. 

the  policy  guiding 

it  should 
its 

Legend: 

= General Meeting of Shareholders 

GMS  
BSE                     = Bucharest Stock Exchange 
BoD  
CCG  
CCG ROMGAZ  =  the  Code  of  Corporate  Governance  of  S.N.G.N.  ROMGAZ  S.A.,  approved on  January  28, 
2016.  
CV  
ToR  

= Board of Directors 
= Code of Corporate Governance 

= Curriculum Vitae  
= Terms of Reference 

Page 9 of 9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNGN “ROMGAZ” SA                                                                                                                                                                                         Annex no.2 
Litigations 

No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

0 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

1 
3878/110/2007 - 
Bacau County 
Court of Law 

513/87/2012  - 
Teleorman 
County Court of 
Law 
2177/99/2012 -  
Iasi County Court 
of Law 

1318/87/2013 - 
Teleorman 
County Court of 
Law 
10917/107/2010/a
2 -  Alba County 
Court of Law 

Case 

2 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

3 

4 

5 

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - creditor 

S.C.Uzina Termica 
Comanesti  S,A - 
debtor 

328,645.82  

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - creditor  

SC Termaserv SRL 
Alexandria - debtor 

7,200,862.02  

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - creditor 

SC CET Iasi SA - 
debtor 

46,270,752.91  

insolvency proceedings 

Romgaz - creditor 

SC Termaconfort SRL 
Rosiorii de Vede - 
debtor 

1,888,200.99  

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - creditor 

SC GHCL UPSOM 
ROMANIA SA- debtor 

68,573,109.11  

1 

6 
Decision no. 318/2009 of Bacau Court approved SNGN ROMGAZ SA‘s 
request 
insolvency  proceedings.  Currently,  specific 
insolvency  proceedings  acts  are  performed.  A  hearing  is  set  for  the 
continuation of procedure. 

initiate 

to 

interest).  Specific 

Receivables:  RON 7,200,862.08 (on December 31, 2011  - equivalent 
value  of  delivered  gas,  penalties, 
insolvency 
procedures  are  performed.  A  hearing  is  set  for  the  continuation  of 
procedure. 
Receivables:  RON  46,270,752.91  (equivalent  value  of  delivered  gas, 
late  payment  penalties,  interest,  court  fees).  Civil  court  resolution  no. 
697/April 17, 2012 issued by Iasi County Court of Law  established the 
initiation  of  the  general  insolvency  procedure  for  the  debtor,  allowed 
the  lodgement  of  claim  as  formulated  by  Romgaz,  the  insolvency 
procedure continued 
Receivables:  RON  1,888,200.99  (delivered  gas  price,  late  payment 
penalties, interest/penalties calculated according to Payment Schedule 
Agreement, fees related to enforcement procedure). 

to 

initiate 

On  29.11.2010,  SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA  filed  against  the  SC  GHCL 
UPSOM  ROMANIA  SA  an  application 
insolvency 
proceedings. 
  (File  no.  10917/107/2010).  SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA 
requested  the  acceptance  of  certain,  liquid  and  due  receivables  in 
amount  of  RON  60,841,881.14  (representing  the  equivalent  value  of 
natural  gas,  penalties  calculated  according  to  Payment  Schedule 
Agreement  no.  100/May  5,  2009,  late  payment  penalties  calculated 
until February 28, 2011, equivalent value of assignment of receivables 
according to Assignment of Receivables Contract no. 1/June 2, 2009). 
Against  decision  no.  351/F/May  18,  2011,  the  debtor  filed  recourse. 
Alba Court of Appeal Law allowed the recourse, ruled the cassation of 
the decision and remanded the case for retrial at Alba County Court of 
Law. 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
7 
January 18, 
2018 

January 18, 
2018 

February 
02, 2018 

January 1, 
2018 

February 
19, 2018 

 
 
              
           
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
 
         
No. 

6 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

9526/3/2016 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz -  creditor  

SC 
Termoelectrica 
Bucuresti - debtor 

PEET 
SA 

42,665,005.29  

Allows the request of SC PEET TERMOELECTRICA S.A. Bucuresti to 
initiate  bankruptcy  procedures  in  simplified  form.  Allows  Romgaz 
lodgment  of  claims  in  amount  of  RON  42,665,005.29.  Bankruptcy 
procedure continues. Hearings are set in this respect. 

7 

8 

8028/95/2013 - 
Gorj County Court 
of Law 

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - creditor 

6991/236/2009 - 
Giurgiu Court of 
Law 

Claims  

Uzina 

S.C. 
Termoelectrica 
Giurgiu - defendant 

S.C. Grup de Comert 
si Investitii SRL (by 
the official receiver-  
Divizia de 
Reorganizare 
Judiciara si Executare 
Creante IPURL) - 
debtor 
Romgaz - plaintiff 

1,135,219.95  On  October  24,  2013,  Gorj  Court  allowed  the  request  of  the  debtor 
S.C.Grup  de  Comert  si  Investitii  SRL  by  Decision    no.  446/2013, 
to 
requesting 
reorganize  its  activity.  Acts  specific  to  the  insolvency  procedure  are 
performed. Hearing is set for the continuation of proceedings.  

insolvency  proceedings 

initiation  of 

in  order 

the 

45,973.26  Amount of claims: RON 45,973.26 - late payment penalties calculated 

according to Natural Gas Sale Contract No.14/2008.   
Recourse. Recourse dismissed by Giurgiu Court of Law. 

9 

598/57/2011 -  
Sibiu County 
Court of Law  

Bring  the  action  before 
administrative appeal  

Romgaz - plaintiff 

Court of Accounts of 
Romania - defendant 

102,357,059  

SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA  brought  the  action  before  administrative  appeal 
requesting  annulment  of  decisions  issued  by  the  Romanian  Court  of 
Accounts  –  Sibiu  Chamber  of  Accounts,  namely:  Note  no.3/2011; 
Decision No.10/24.01.2011;Finding report registered at SNGN Romgaz 
SA under no. 2033/10.12.2010. According to Ruling no. 950/2016 the 
action was denied. Recourse was filed. On January 10, 2018 the court 
allowed the recourses filed by the plaintiffs SNGN Romgaz S.A. and by 
the  interveners  CAMERON  INTERNATIONAL  CORPORATION,  SC 
INDUSTRIAL  TRADING  SRL,  SC 
INSPET  SA  PLOIEŞTI,  SC 
CONDMAG SA, SC  PETROSTAR SA against ruling 950/2016 issued 
by Sibiu County Court of Law. Part of the ruling is annulled and retains 
the  file  for  retrial  of  findings  and  measures  no.  4,  5,  6  of  Decision 
10/January 24, 2001 issued by Sibiu Court of Accounts. Sets a hearing 

2 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
March 27, 
2018 

January 29, 
2018 

Finalized, 
enforcement 
of 
judgement, 
the 
receivables 
is partially 
recovered, 
amount to 
recover: 
RON 
5.746.67  
March 07, 
2018 

 
         
 
       
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

on  March  7,  2018  for  the  presentation  of  merits  in  connection  with 
findings and measures no. 4, 5, 6 of Decision 10/January 24, 2001 with 
summoning  the  parties.  The  remaining  part  of  the  Ruling  950/2016 
issued  by  Sibiu  County  Court  of  Law  is  maintained.  Dismisses  the 
recourse  filed  by  SNGN  Romgaz  S.A.  against  ruling  no.  1421/2017 
issued  by  Sibiu  County  Court  of  Law.  Final  ruling  no.  1/2018  dated 
January 10, 2018. 
In the summons, SNGN ROMGAZ SA requested the court to compel 
the defendants to a jointly payment of monies.   

In the summons, SNGN ROMGAZ SA requested the court  to compel 
the  defendants  to  pay  jointly  the  amount  of  RON  43.059.199, 
representing  an  undue  payment  in  connection  with  labor  contract  no. 
217/2006 

20,052,457  

43,059,199  

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

stay of trial 
proceedings 

stay of trial 
proceedings 

15,596,065  

In the summons, SNGN ROMGAZ SA requested the court to compel 
the defendants to a jointly payment of monies.   

stay of trial 
proceedings 

23,645,128  

In the summons, SNGN ROMGAZ SA requested the court  to compel 
the defendants to pay.  

stay of trial 
proceedings 

 7852/85/2013 -
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

8259/62/2013 - 
Brasov County 
Court of Law 

Claims -undue payment  Romgaz - plaintiff 

Claims -undue payment  Romgaz - plaintiff 

8258/62/2013 - 
Brasov County 
Court of Law 

Claims 
payment, 
contract no.14/2009 

-undue 
works 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

Claims -undue payment  Romgaz - plaintiff 

SC APROV SA; SC 
ROMOIL SA - 
defendant 

SC Condmag SA; 
Cameron International 
Corporation - 
defendants 

SC INSPET SA; SC 
Condmag SA; SC 
Petrostar SA; SC 
Industrial Trading 
SRL - defendants 
SC Condmag SA - 
defendant 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

8260/62/2013 - 
Brasov County 
Court of Law 

19495/3/2013 - 
Bucharest Court 
of Law 

2541/96/2013 - 
Harghita County 
Court of Law  

claims (equivalent value 
of  delivered  and  unpaid 
natural  gas,  according 
to  gas  sale-purchase 
contract no. 2/2010)  
insolvency proceedings 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

SC G-ON Eurogaz 
SRL - defendant 

11,920,527.50 

Claimed amount: RON 11,920,527.50 (equivalent value of delivered 
and unpaid natural gas)  

compulsory 
enforcement 

 Romgaz - creditor  

 SC  MAVEXIM  SRL  - 
debtor  

  On  the  trial  date  of  June  25,  2013,  the  court  allowed  the  debtor’s 
request to file for insolvency (in compliance with art. 27 paragraph 5 of 
law 85/2006). The debtor initiated insolvency procedures. 

February 
14, 2018 

3 

 
         
 
         
         
         
         
 
No. 

16 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

781/85/2014 Sibiu 
Court of Law 
(Bucuresti Court 
of Law file no.  
28323/3/2014  

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Claims 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

Electrocentrale 
- 
Bucuresti 

SC 
SA 
defendant 

240,280,906  

Amount of claim: RON 240,280,906.05. The court allows the summons 
and issued ruling 2514/May 13, 2015. The defendant files an appeal. 
The  court  of  appeal  allows  the  appeal  filed  by  SC  Electrocentrale 
Bucuresti S.A. through its Official Receiver KPMG Restructuring SPRL, 
partly  changes  the  appealed  ruling  meaning  that  it  partly  allows  the 
case and compels the defendant to pay RON 40,511,915.91 as  legal 
interest. Recourse may be filed within 30 days from communication of 
ruling no. 1176/June 26, 2017. Recourse filed.    

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Not 
estalished 

17 

1540/215/2013 - 
Craiova Court of 
Law 

Claims 

Prunoiu  Gheorghita 
- plaintiff 

Romgaz 
Ploiesti - defendant 

-  SISGN 

50,000  According to the summons, the plaintiff requests the decommissioning 
of pipelines allegedly undercrossing the plaintiff’s land and to  compel 
the  defendant  to  the  payment  of  the  equivalent  value  for  non-use  of 
land affected by such pipelines. The case is under stay of proceedings 
because the plaintiff did not comply with the court’s dispositions. 
The case is reinstated. 
A topographical and agricultural expertise was order. 

February 
12, 2018 

18 

19 

20 

21 

1463/108/2012 –
Arad Court of Law 

 Insolvency proceedings 

Romgaz – SISGN 
Ploiesti – creditor 

SC Amarad SA – 
debtor 

42,418.48 

Upon the debtor’s request, prepared in accordance with the provision 
of Article 27, paragraph 5 of Law 85/2006, insolvency procedures were 
initiated.  

January 25, 
2018 

488/251/2008 –
Ludus Court of 
Law 

2375/85/2016 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

2798/85/2016 
Alba Iulia Court of 
Appeal  

Petrea Zachei, 
Petrea Cornelia – 
plaintiffs 

Romgaz -  Tg. Mures  
Branch– defendant 

20,000 

challenge 

Romgaz – plaintiff 

Romanian Court of 
Accounts – defendant 

Romgaz – plaintiff 

Romanian Court of 
Accounts – defendant 

Suspending the 
implementation of 
decision 94/August 17, 
2017 issued by the 
Romanian Court of 
Accounts 

Subject of 
dispute cannot 
be evaluated in 
money 
Subject of 
dispute cannot 
be evaluated in 
money 

4 

January 21, 
2018 

January 26, 
2018 

Finalized 

the 

file  no. 

irrevocable  decision  of 

By summons, the plaintiffs requested the court to establish the property 
title in connection with an unincorporated parcel of 11,600sq.m.  
Case  suspended  until 
487/251/2012*. Reinstated upon plaintiffs’ request. 
Challenge of Decision no. 26/2016 issued by the Romanian Court of 
Accounts – Sibiu Court of Accounts. Proceedings on the merits. Two 
relating expertizes were approved in connection with accounting and 
natural gas matters.  
Romgaz summoned the Court of Accounts whereby it requested the 
suspension of Decision 94/August 17, 2017 issued by the Romanian 
Court of Accounts in solving the challenge against decision 26/June 
01, 2016 until the  settlement of case 2375/85/2016. Sibiu County 
Court of Law partially allowed the suspension request in connection 
with the irregularities 1 and 2 established by the Court of Accounts. 
Recourse. Alba Iulia Court of Accounts by Decision 665/March 15, 
2017 allows the recourse filed by the Court of Accounts dismissing 
Romgaz request for suspension. Dismisses the recourse filed by 
Romgaz. Final ruling. 

 
       
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

No. 

22 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

17666/320/2010 –
Tg. Mures Court 
Of Law 

 claims 

23 

7070/320/2012 –
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law 

 claims 

Romgaz - Suc. Tg. 
Mures – defendant 

SC Network Press 
Concept SRL 
Medias  (former 
RODIPET) – 
defendant 

Barsan Romulus - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz – Suc. Tg. 
Mures – defendant 

24 

963/85//2013 –
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

 claims 

Romgaz – Suc. Tg. 
Mures – plaintiff 

Borda Alexandru – 
defendant 

25 

26 

1434/1371/2007 
Mureş 
Commercial Court 
of Law 

2899/62/2015 
Brasov County 
Court of Law  

Insolvency procedure 

Romgaz – STTM 
Tg.Mureş – Creditor 

SC Poliglot 
Comimpex SRL - 
Debtor 

Insolvency procedure 

SNGN Romgaz SA 
–STTM Tg.Mureş – 
creditor 

27 

580/1371/2010 –
Mures 
Commercial Court 

 claims 

Romgaz – Suc. 
Medias – creditor 

SC Condmag SA 
Brasov, debtor, 
represented by the 
Official Receiver 
Rominsolv SPRL 
Bucuresti  
SC Globe Trotters 
SRL – debtor 

5 

 6,851.25   The  defendant  failed  to  meet  the  contractual  obligation  to  deliver  the 
Romanian Official Journal for Q2 and Q3/2008: 3 subscriptions to Part 
I, 3 subscriptions to Part I bis and  1 subscription to Part VI, therefore 
the  defendant  is  obliged  to  refund  RON  6,851.25  (out  of  which  RON 
565,70 is VAT). Currently the case is suspended based on Article 36 of 
Law 85/2006 on Insolvency procedure.  

 88.000   By summons the plaintiff requested the court to compel the payment of 
the  following  claims:  RON  80,000;  RON  30,000;  RON  3,000/month; 
RON  88,000.  Tg.  Mures  local  court  of  law  allowed  Romgaz  request 
during the hearing of January 9, 2018, whereby additional clarifications 
were  requested  from  expert  Dirija  Marcel  in  connection  with  the 
expertise report dated December 22, 2017. The case was postponed 
to February 06, 2018  

1,307  The  case  consists  of  compelling  the  defendant  to  refund  the  plaintiff 
RON  1,304  representing  the  holiday  allowance  and  the  holiday 
remuneration for the period he didn’t work and received holiday leave, 
because  after  effectuating  the  holiday  leave  for  the  year  2012  (34 
days)  in  March  and  May  2012,  the  defendant  had  a  number  of  32 
(working  days)  of  unjustified  absences,  which  lead  to  his  disciplinary 
dismissal.  Court  allowed  the  action.  The  enforcement  order  was 
initiated.  

 6,783.41  As  of  November  22,  2007,  Mures  County  Court  of  Law  allowed  the 
request  for  initiating  the  insolvency  procedure  against  the  debtor  SC 
Poliglot  Coninpex  RL.  STTM  Tg.  Mures  is  a  creditor  included  in  the 
body of creditors with the amount RON 6,783.41.  

70,467.25  STTM Tg. Mures is creditor, its RON 70,467.25 receivable being 

included in the final body of creditors. Hearing is allowed for 
confirmation of reorganization plan and for filing the general bankruptcy 
procedure filed by AJFP Braşov. 
The request is allowed. 

9,206.21  Value of claims:  RON 9,206.21 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
stay of trial 
proceedings 

February 
06, 2018 

enforcement 

February 
22, 2018 

February 
13, 2018 

January 21, 
2018 

 
 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

of Law 

28 

29 

30 

12236/320/2012 –
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law 

3128/257/2013 –
Medias Court of 
Law 

3127/257/2013 –
Medias Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Romgaz – Suc. 
Medias – plaintiffs 

Claims 

Romgaz  – plaintiff 

claims 

Romgaz – plaintiff 

SC Torpi SRL; SC 
Manadas SRL – 
defendands 

Asociatia sportiva 
“Dacia Atel” – 
defendant 

Asociatia 
transparenta deciziei 
administrative Medias 
– defendant  

 11,575.52   Value of claims: RON 11,575.52  

 6,247.77  By summons, the court is requested to establish the termination of the 
Sponsorship Contract no. 178/2011 and, as a consequence, to restore 
the parties to their initial state by obligating the defendant ASOCIATIA 
SPORTIVA “DACIA ATEL to pay RON 6,247.77,  
RON 5,000 as financial support provided under Contract 178/2011. 

2,926.64  By summons, the court is requested to establish the termination of the 
Sponsorship Contract no. 8/February 25, 2010 and, as a consequence, 
to  restore  the  parties  to  the  initial  state  by  obligating  the  defendant 
ASOCIATIA 
ADMINISTRATIVE 
MEDIAS” to pay the amount RON 2,926.64. 

“TRANSPARENTA  DECIZIEI 

31 

1542/102/2017- 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Challenge against 
disciplinary sanction 
decision  

Stoica Eugen– 
plaintiff 

SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. 
– STTM Tg. Mures – 
defendant 

993 lei 

32 

33 

1733/102/2017- 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Challenge against 
disciplinary sanction 
decision 

Popeanu 
Sebastian- plaintiff 

SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. 
– STTM Tg. Mures – 
defendant 

1,560  

3513/320/2016 –
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Complaint of violation 

SNGN ROMGAZ 
S.A. – STTM Tg. 
Mures – plaintiff 

IPJ  Mures , Traffic 
Office – defendant 

4,000 

6 

STTM issued a disciplinary sanction decision against its employee, the 
plaintiff, whereby he was sanctioned with a 10% reduction of the base 
salary for 3 months. 
Ruling no. 779/10.10.2017 – allows the challenge. Annulment of the 
defendant’s Decision 98/April 24, 2017. Compels the defendant to 
refund the amount retained from the plaintiff’s salary, amount to be 
updated and indexed on its actual payment and to pay court fees of 
RON 2,000. 
The defendant filed for appeal. Appeal hearing established. 
The case consists of a challenge raised against the sanction decision 
issued by the defendant, whereby the plaintiff was sanctioned with a 
10% reduction of the base salary for 3 months. 
The case was deferred. The testimony of one witness is to be taken. 
The ruling 988/07.12.2017 – dismisses the civil case. 
SNGN ROMGAZ SA -STTM Tg. Mures filed a complaint of violation in 
connection with Record of Findings 0074811/2016 whereby IPJ Mures 
fined Romgaz with RON 4,000 on grounds that for the special 
transportation vehicle (cesspool emptier) license plate MS-86-TTM, the 
driver failed to present tachometer records for the past 28 days. The 
car is equipped with a digital device, making therefore available to the 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

stay of trial 
proceedings 

compulsory 
enforcement 

compulsory 
enforcement 

January 30, 
2018 

Ruling not 
communicat
ed 

Finalized 

 
  
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

34 

30/257/2017- 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Embezzlement Art. 295 
Criminal Code 

SNGN ROMGAZ 
S.A. – STTM Tg. 
Mures – civil party 
claiming damages 

Tarnu Razvan Cornel- 
defendant 

1,024 

police officer the tachometer card. IPJ Mures did not take such into 
account because it had no technical devices for reading and 
interpreting such data. 
Ruling 5685/24.11.2016 allows the complaint and cancels the Record 
of Findings. Appeal filed. Appeal dismissed. 
Indictment drafted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Medias Court of 
Law ordered the trial of the defendant Tarnu Razvan charged with 
embezzlement as stipulated in Art.295 par.1 Penal Code. 
Romgaz, is civil party claiming damages in amount of RON 1,024, 
equivalent value of 200 l of fuel stolen by the defendant. 
Penal ruling 223/CC/08.06.2017 issued by Medias Court of Law orders 
the consideration of case. The ruling was challenged by the defendant. 
The challenge was dismissed by Sibiu County Court of Law ruling 
72/CCP/2017/26.07.2017. Term established for the defendant to 
employ defense and for witness hearings. 

35 

3104/85/2014 - 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Public procurement 
related litigation 

Romgaz plaintiff 

36 

1794/85/2014 - 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Adjustment of Work 
Contract no. 
233/September 26,  
2012 

S.C. Dafora S.A 
Medias: plaintiff 

3.840.149,47 
plus TVA 

274.900,60  Romgaz  requested  the  court  to  compel  the  defendants  to  the  joint 
updated  payment  of  RON  274,900.60  representing  the  prejudice 
caused  to  Romgaz  representing  the  equivalent  value  of  electricity 
generation not made during December 16, 2013-January 14, 2014 and 
to  the  payment  of  court  fees.  Accounting  expertise  was  performed. 
Deadline  was  set  for  the  expert  to  reply  to  challenges  made  in 
connection with the expertise. Postponement for filing an addendum to 
the expertise 
In  the  summons,  the  plaintiff  requested  the  court  to  establish  the 
adjustment of work contract no. 233/September 26, 2012 meaning the 
increase  of  contract  price  by  RON  3,840,149.47  plus  VAT  and  to 
compel  Romgaz  to  the  payment  thereof.  This  amount  represents  the 
equivalent  value  of  additional  and  unforeseen  works  and  the  legal 
interest. 
Alternately, to compel Romgaz to pay RON 3,840,149.47 plus VAT as 
damages for contract default, and the relating court fees.  
The case benefitted from a technical and legal expertise in the field of 
natural gas, the trial date was September 2, 2015 when the expertise 
finding  was  filed.  Appeal  was  filed.  Response  to  appeal.  Recourse 
dismissed.  
Money refund notification was sent. 

S.C. ICPE 
Electrocond 
Tehnologies S.A., 
Energ Natural Power 
Limited, S.C. 
Instaservice S.R.L.: 
defendants 

Romgaz: defendant 

7 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

January 22, 
2018 

January 23, 
2018 

finalized 

 
No. 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

4760/102/2013 - 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Criminal court - 
corruption (Law 
78/2000) 

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Medias: 
injured party 

Giurgea Teodor s.a.: 
defendant 

2699/251/2014 - 
Ludus Court of 
Law 

2415/284/2015 
Racari Court of 
Law separated 
from case 
770/284/2014  
2042/320/2015 – 
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law  

3843/121/2014 – 
Galati County 
Court of Law 

Eviction  

claims 

Romgaz - SPEE 
Iernut: plaintiff 

SC Marele Alb 
Prodimpex SRL: 
defendant 

Tudor Gheorghita 
s.a: plaintiff 

Romgaz - SISGN 
Ploiesti: defendant  

claims - compensation 

Chiciudean Vasile - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz - Suc. Tg. 
Mures - defendant 

Insolvency procedure 

Romgaz - creditor 

Electrocentrale Galati 
SA - debtor 

8 

In  this  case  file,  Romgaz  –  Sucursala  Medias  is  injured  party  as  it  is 
creditor  to  SC  Globe  Trotters  SRL,  a  company  in  insolvency.  In  fact, 
the prejudice to Romgaz – Sucursala Medias is due to an agreement 
between the defendants and the directors of SC Globe Trottes SRL for 
the  creation  of  an  unlawful  assignment  (by  making  use  of  fictional 
documents). 

  The  scope  of  file  is  the  settlement  of  the  eviction  request  initiated  by 
the plaintiff due to the fact that the defendant has late rent payments. 
On  May  7,  2015,  the  court  allowed  the  request.  The  compulsory 
enforcement procedure was initiated.  

  The  plaintiffs  request  the  payment  of  an  allowance  in  exchange  for 
easement  rights  in  order  to  gain  access  to  wells  116  and  131 
Bilciuresti. 
On  November  08,  2017  the  ruling  was  pending.  The  case  was 
dismissed. 

5,112  On November 25, 2016, at the first trial of Tg. Mures Court of Law, the 
ruling  was  postponed  to  December  6,  2016  when  according  to 
Decision  5880/2016  the  request  of  the  plaintiff  was  allowed.  The 
defendant  is  compelled  to  pay  RON  5,112  as  damages,  to  pay  the 
court expenses. The ruling was not communicated.  
162,281,861.83  The subject matter of the case file is the settlement of the request filed 
by the debtor SC Electrocentrale Galati SA, under Law no.85/2006 on 
insolvency  procedure.  On  June  16,  2014,  the  Court  allowed  the 
application, decided to open the general insolvency procedure against 
the debtor.  
SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA 
the 
filed  an  application 
outstanding debt in amount of RON 162,281,861.83 (equivalent value 
of natural gas, penalties and interests). In relation to this amount to be 
included 
the  body  of  creditors,  only  RON 
139,056,681.91  was  allowed  by  the  liquidator  of  assets  of  SC 
Electrocentrale  Galati  SA.  Romgaz,  as  creditor,  challenged  the 
preliminary  table  of  receivables.  (Currently,  the  challenges  to  the 
preliminary table are on trial) 
For subsequent procedure – trial date:  

to  acknowledge 

for  Romgaz 

in 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
January 22, 
2018 

Compulsory 
enforcement 

January 29, 
2018 

January 29, 
2018 

 
 
 
No. 

42 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

2190/257/2015- 
Medias Court of 
Law 

1532/1/2015 – 
ICCJ 
2303/1/2017/ - 
ICCJ 

2899/62/15 – 
Brasov County 
Court of Law  

 4783/121/2011 
Galati County 
Court of Law 

509/1371/2015  
Mures County 
Court of Law 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz - 
complainant 

Corrupt payment 

Romgaz – plaintiff 
claiming damages 

Autoritatea Nationala 
de Reglementare in 
Domeniul Energiei 
(Romanian National 
Regulatory Authority 
for Energy)- 
respondent 
Rudel Obreja s.a. - 
defendant 

75,000   The scope of the dispute is the settlement of the complaint of violation 
filed  by  SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA  that  mainly  requested  the  annulment  of 
the  Finding  Report  and  Sanctioning  of  Non-Criminal  Offences  no. 
43376/June  11,  2015  prepared  by  ANRE,  and,  alternatively, 
replacement  of 
fine  sanction  by  a  warning.  Complainant’s 
application allowed. Appeal possible. Appeal filed. Appeal dismissed. 

the 

410,000 

In  the  case  file,  SNGN  ROMGAZ  SA  is  plaintiff  claiming  damages  in 
amount of RON 410,000. Dismissing the request to be plaintiff claiming 
damages. Appeal filed.   

January 29, 
2018 

 insolvency 

Romgaz 

 SC Condmag SA  

 83,225,512.28   Recovery of undue payment found by the Court of Accounts 

insolvency 

Romgaz- creditor 

Elcen Galati-debtor 

162,281,861.83    Challenge of the nominal table 

insolvency 

Romgaz- creditor 

Foraj Sonde Ernei-
debtor 

1,428.98   Trial date. Insolvency procedure is continued. 

2496/102/2015* - 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law  

claims 

Romgaz - SA Suc. 
Tg. Mures  - plaintiff 

Kovacs Ladislau - 
defendant 

318,881.96  Dismisses  the  complaint  filed  by  the  plaintiff  against  the  defendant. 
Compels  the  defendant  to  the  payment  of  RON  1,950  as  court 
expenses.  Right 
the 
to  appeal  exercisable 
communication of ruling. Ruling 1316/2017 

in  10  days 

from 

1560/251/2015 
Ludus Court of 
Law 

claims 

Romgaz-plaintiff 

Romarcom SRL-
defendant 

62,972.85  The  civil  actions  for  claiming  damages  filed  by  Romgaz-SPEE  Iernut 

against SC Romarcom SRL is partially allowed and consequently: 

- 

- 

the  defendant  is  obliged  to  pay  the  plaintiff  RON  16,605.35 
as damages; 
the  defendant  is  obliged  to  pay  the  plaintiff  RON  935 

9 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
The RON 
25,000 fine 
is to be 
recovered. 

February 
27, 2018 

April 3, 
2018 

February 
14, 2018 

Currently 
not 
established 

 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

- 

representing court fees. 
SC  Romarcom  filed  for  appeal.  Appeal  dismissed.  Right  to 
recourse. 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

8029/2/2015 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

Challenge of 
administrative 
document 

Romgaz 

ANAF Brasov 

22,424,030  Bucharest  Court  of  Appeal  partially  allows  Romgaz  action.  Ruling  is 

challenged with appeal by both parties. 

774/308/2016 
Sighisoara Court 
of Law 

775/308/2016 
Sighisoara Court 
of Law 

Specific performance 

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Medias 

Topliceanu N.: 
defendant 

Equivalent 
value of ordered 
expertize  

The  defendant  requests  the  registration  in  the  Land  Register  2500 
Nades  of  the  housing  Nades  canton,  which  Romgaz  has  sold  by 
means of Sale Contract no. 10723/December 9, 1997. 

Specific performance 

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Medias 

Moldovan Vasile: 
defendant 

Equivalent 
value of ordered 
expertize 

The  defendant  requests  the  registration  in  the  Land  Register  2500 
Nades  of  the  housing  Nades  canton,  which  Romgaz  has  sold  by 
means  of  Sale  Contract  no.  10724/December  9,  1997.  Case  file  joint 
with case file 774/308/2016. 

8237/107/2012 
Alba County Court 
of Law 

Insolvency  

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Medias-
creditor 

SC AgroValea Lunga 
SRL: debtor 

986.52  Equivalent value of unpaid invoice. 

8057/320/2016 - 
Targu Mures 
Court of Law 

claims 

SC Ambient SA: 
plaintiff 

Romgaz - STTM 
Targu Mures: 
defendant 

54 

9261/320/2016 - 
Targu Mures 
Court of Law 

unjust enrichment 

SC Rocada Serv 
SRL: plaintiff 

Romgaz - STTM 
Targu Mures: 
defendant 

130,496.59  The  plaintiff  requests  the  payment  of  RON  130,496.59  representing 
outstanding payment obligations under the Debt Assumption Contract 
no. 121/September 21, 2012 concluded with Romgaz-STTM, to which 
the legal interest is added. Ruling no. 847/2017 dismisses the request. 
The defendant requests the supplementation of ruling with the order to 
compel the plaintiff to payment of court expenses already paid by the 
defendant. Plaintiff filed an appeal. 

24,045.92  The plaintiff requests to compel the defendant to the payment of RON 
24.045,92 representing the equivalent value of transportation services 
supplied  and  not  paid  and  relating  late  payment  penalties  applied 
against the principal debt until the actual date of payment.  Ruling no. 
1196/2017  partially  allows  the  claim,  dismisses  the  plaintiff’s  claim 

10 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

Currently 
not 
established 

Stay of trial 
proceedings 
due to non-
payment of 
expertize 
Stay of trial 
proceedings 

January 16, 
2018 

Currently 
not 
established 

Appeal not 
filed until 
the date 
hereof 

 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

55 

56 

413/257/2017- 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint against 
ordinance of non-lieu 
(art. 340 New Criminal 
Code of Procedure) 

Tarnu Razvan 
Cornel- defendant  

SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. 
– STTM Tg. Mures – 
civil party  

1,024 

30/257/2017/a1- 
Medias Court of 
Law 

57 

31/257/2017 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Measures and 
exceptions ordered by 
the preliminary chamber 
judge in connection with 
in connection with the 
trial start. 
Confirmation of release 
from criminal 
prosecution 

Tarnu Razvan 
Cornel- defendant 

SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. 
– STTM Tg. Mures – 
civil party 

1,024 

Crisan Mircea - 
defendant 

SNGN ROMGAZ S.A. 
– STTM Tg. Mures – 
civil party 

101.6 

58 

5991/303/2016 
Bucharest Sector 
6 Court of Law 

Claims 

SC Loreto Exim SRL 

Romgaz – 
SIRCOSS and 
Romgaz – STTM 
Tg. Mures 

11 

against  the  defendant  as  unfounded.  Compels  the  defendants  to  the 
joint  payment  of  RON  1,307  as  court  expenses  and  dismisses  the 
plaintiff’s  request  to  compel  the  defendant  to  the  payment  of  lawyer 
fee, as unfounded. Right of appeal in 30 days from the communication 
of the ruling.  
Claim filed by the defendant against the Prosecutor’s Office Ordinance 
whereby the defendant Tarnu R was ordered to trial on charge of 
embezzlement as stipulated in Art.295 par.1 Criminal Code. Final 
ruling of disinvestment conjoins this case file with case file 
30/257/2017. 
Request filed by the defendant for the establishment of nullity of the 
evidence examined during the criminal prosecution phase. Romgaz, 
through STTM, constituted as civil party claiming damages for the 
amount of RON 1.024 representing equivalent value of 200l of fuel 
stolen by the defendant. Penal ruling 223/CC/2017 establishes the 
legality of filing the indictment and orders the trial.  
Indictment of penal case 2507/P/2016 of the Public Prosecutor’s Office 
ordering the release from criminal prosecution of defendant Crisan 
Mircea in connection with the embezzlement offense on ground of lack 
of public interest in pursuing this matter based on Criminal Code of 
Procedure provisions. Romgaz, through STTM established as civil 
party claiming damages for RON 101.6 representing the equivalent 
value of 20 l of fuel stolen by the defendant. Penal ruling 
38/CC/27.01.2017 dismisses the confirmation request annulling the 
latter. Criminal prosecution to be continued and completed; final ruling 
26,099.4  Sector  6  Bucuresti  Court  of  Law  –  action  filed  for  restitution  for  the 
recovery  from  SC  Loreto  Exim  SRL  of  RON  26,099.4  representing 
undue  payment  generating  for  the  defendant  an  unjust  enrichment. 
The  claim  was  partially  allowed.  Right  to  appeal  in  30  days  from  the 
communication date. 
Appeal  filed  by  STTM  on  April  07,  2016  and  by  the  two  litigating 
parties, Romgaz Sircoss and Loreto Exim SRL, term for appeal set by 
Bucharest  County  Court  of  Law 
for  missing  proper  summons 
procedure in relation to the defendant 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

Final ruling 

Final ruling 

March 22, 
2018 

 
 
No. 

59 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

3183/306/2016 – 
Sibiu Court of Law 

claims 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Romgaz - SPEE 
Iernut : plaintiff 

SC Laromet Metal 
Star-D SRL: 
defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

4,000.03  Recovery of receivables. Request is allowed. 

847/1285/2014 - 
Cluj County 
Specialized Court 
of Law  

Insolvency proceedings  Romgaz - SPEE 
Iernut - creditor 

SC Marele Alb 
Prodimpex SRL -
debtor 

64,742  Continuation of insolvency procedure 

1335/251/2016 – 
Ludus Court of 
Law 

claims 

Romgaz - SPEE 
Iernut: plaintiff 

PFA Cormos Daniela: 
defendant 

4,184.00  Recovery of receivables. Request allowed. Dismisses the appeal filed 

by the defendant. 

698/251/2016 – 
Ludus Court of 
Law 

Claims, separated from 
File Case no. 
1855/251/2013 

PFA Cormos 
Daniela: plaintiff 

Insolvency proceedings  Romgaz: creditor 

Romgaz - SPEE 
Iernut: defendant; SC 
Comindal Impex SRL: 
defendant 

SC Foraj Sonde SA 
Ernei: debtor 

150,000  Damages. Dismisses the plaintiff’s request. Right to file an appeal. 

1,428.98  Request to initiate insolvency proceedings.  

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Compulsory 
enforcement 

March 14, 
2018 

Compulsory 
enforcement 

Ruling not 
communicat
ed 

February 
13, 2018 

 insolvency 

Romgaz 

 SC Condmag SA  

 3,291.41   Request to initiate insolvency proceedings. Stay of proceedings 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Targu 
Mures: appellant 

Politia Municipiului 
Targu Mures: 
respondent  

2,000  Complaint of violation against the offence report. Complaint of violation 
dismissed.  Appeal  filed  by  the  appellant.  Appeal  dismissed.  Ruling 
1452/2017.  

Finalized 

12 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

509/1371/2015 – 
Mures 
Commercial Court 
of Law 

2899/62/15 – 
Brasov County 
Court of Law  

5452/320/2016 -  
Targu Mures 
Court of Law 

 
 
No. 

66 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

5453/320/2016 -  
Targu Mures 
Court of Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz - 
Sucursala Targu 
Mures: appellant 

Politia Municipiului 
Targu Mures: 
respondent  

2,000  Complaint of violation against the offence report. Complaint of violation 
allowed. Respondent files for appeal. Appeal allowed. The complaint of 
violation  is  entirely  dismissed  due  to  lack  of  substantiation  of  such 
complaint filed against the offence report PMSY no. 000169 dated April 
26, 2014. Final ruling: 1309/2017.  

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Finalized 

claims 

319/1371/2016 – 
Mures 
Commercial Court 
of Law 

LEX Guard Security 
SRL Reghin: 
plaintiff 

Romgaz - Sucursala 
Targu Mures: 
defendant 

126,483.91  Claims  arising  in  connection  with  the  abusive  termination  of  Security 
Services Contract. Action dismissed. Court issues ruling no. 94/2016. 
Appeal may be filed within 30 days. Ruling is not communicated.   

Currently 
not 
established 

67 

68 

69 

627/102/2016 – 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

corruption 

Romgaz: injured 
party and plaintiff 
claiming damages 

9526/3/2016 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

insolvency proceedings  Romgaz -  creditor  

70 

681/57/2015 

Action for annulment 

Romgaz: plaintiff 

Avram  Pantelimon, 
Olaru Ioan Tiberiu, 
Mincan Emil Valentin, 
Ştefan Ioan: 
defendants 
SC 
Termoelectrica 
Bucuresti - debtor 

PEET 
SA 

Consiliul National 
pentru Combaterea 
Discriminarii si 
Sindicatul "Extractie 
Gaze si Servicii" 

146,637.06  Criminal action against corruption.  

Insolvency  

42,665,005.29  

  The  scope  of 

is 

the  action 

to  partially  allow  Decision  no. 
371/September 2, 2015 issued by Colegiul Director al CNCD,   the use 
of the wording “signing syndicate” in Romgaz Collective Labor Contract 
2015-2016  does  not  constitute  a  discrimination  based  on  syndicate 
membership  and  on  access  to  its  facilities;  consequently  the  deletion 
from Romgaz Collective Labor Contract of the above-indicated wording 
is not required, the issuance of a fine to Romgaz is not grounded and 
the publishing of the resolution in a nation-wide paper is not required. 
Alba  Court  of  Appeal  allowed  the  action.  CNCD  filed  recourse.  ICCJ 
did not set a trial date. 

February 7, 
2018 

March 27, 
2018 

Currently 
not 
established 

Stay of 
proceedings 

71 

1284/102/2016 
Mures County 
Court of Law  

Labour  related litigation  Sturza Ioan: plaintiff  Romgaz 

158,272  Discrimination.  Stay  of  proceedings  until  the  final  settlement  of  file 

249/57/2016. 

13 

 
         
 
No. 

72 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

249/57/2016 Alba 
Iulia Court of 
Appeal 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Labour  related litigation  Romgaz: plaintiff 

CNCD and Sturza 
Ioan: defendants 

  Alba-Iulia  Court  of  Appeal:  annulment  of  Decision  no.  603/December 
09, 2015.Recourse will be filed with the Higher Court of Cassation and 
Justice. 

73 

1300/102/2016 

Labour  related litigation  Tegla Nicodim 
Ciprian: plaintiff 

Romgaz: defendant 

74 

1311/257/2016 – 
Medias Court of 
Law 

claims 

Romgaz 

Asociatia "Creation 
Transylvania" 

75 

4887/306/2016 – 
Sibiu Court of Law 

claims 

Romgaz 

Asociatia "Sf. Patrick" 

130,000  Mures County Court of Law: scope of case file is to compel Romgaz to: 
   -  review  salary-related  rights  starting  with  2013  until  now  and 
onwards;  
   - pay salary-related monetary difference starting with June 2013 until 
the full payment thereof amounting RON 130,000 at the record date of 
the action, for 36 months;  
   -  pay  legal  interest  on  salary-related  monetary  differences  starting 
with  June  2013  until  the  full  payment  thereof.  Accounting  expertize 
shall be performed. Term established for filing the expertize. 
7,000  Summons, reimbursement of amount. Action allowed. Final ruling. 

1,750  According 

to 

the  summons, 

the  partial  unilateral  resolution  of 
Sponsorship Contract no. 8207/2015 and reimbursement of amount is 
petitioned. Sibiu Court of Law dismissed the request. Romgaz filed for 
appeal in May 19, 2017. Appeal dismissed. Final ruling 1207/2017. 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Currently 
not 
established 

February 
20, 2018 

Finalized 

Finalized 

76 

77 

3595/279/2016 - 
Piatra Neamt 
Court of Law 

claims 

SC Accent Service 
SRL 

Romgaz 

11,395.30  Payment of equivalent value of car repair services for cars in Romgaz 
property.  Allows  the  request  of  Accent  Service  as  per  Ruling 
1170/2017 (final). 

Finalized 

5243/257/2016 - 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz 

ANRE 

14 

  Complaint  of  violation 

to  Offence  Report  no. 
relation 
87670/December 14, 2016.Complaint dismissed. Appeal filed. Appeal 
dismissed. Ruling 1174/2017. 

in 

Finalized 

 
No. 

78 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

5217/257/2016 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz 

ANRE 

  Complaint  of  violation 

to  Offence  Report  no. 
relation 
87105/December  12,  2016.  Complaint  allowed.  Appeal  filed.  Ruling 
postponed. Appeal allowed. Modifies the appeal ruling – the complaint 
of violation is dismissed. Final Ruling 1170/2017. 

in 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Finalized 

35304/3/2016 - 
Bucharest Court 
of Law 

Insolvency  

Romgaz: creditor 

SC Electrocentrale 
Bucuresti SA: debitor 

569,945,968.48 

Insolvency – table of receivables was filed. Challenge was filed. Allows 
the challenge of debtor DistrigazSud Retele. Appeal may be filed within 
7 days from its publication in the Official Journal of Romania. 

Term not 
established 

2625/2017 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

Insolvency 

Romgaz: creditor - 
appelant 

SC Electrocentrale 
Bucuresti SA: debtor-
appelant 

  Challenge of table of receivables 

January 30, 
2018 

6909/2017 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

Insolvency 

Romgaz: creditor-
claimant in revision 

SC Electrocentrale 
Bucuresti SA: debtor- 

  Motion  for  revision  of  appeal  Ruling  1239/2017  whereby  the  court 
compels Romgaz not the change, suspend or to temporary decline the 
supply of gas to the debtor. 

Not 
established 

79 

80 

81 

82 

341/257/2017- 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz - 
complainant 

83 

1582/85/2017 – 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Claims  

Ecaterina Popescu, 
former member of 
Romgaz Board - 
defendant  

50,000   Complaint of violation. Complaint dismissed. Ruling 1332/2017. Appeal 
filed. Appeal dismissed by the complainant is dismissed. Final  Ruling 
1519/2017 

Finalized 

81,267.96  The defendant requests the payment of RON 81,267.96 as damages 
for the sudden and abusive revocation of her mandate as member of 
the  board.  On  October  4,  2017  the  cross  examining  was  allowed 
(suggested  by  the  defendant).  Ruling  790/2017  partly  allowed  the 
defendant’s  claim  and  compelled  Romgaz  to  payment  of  damages  of 
RON 72.630 and of RON 2,552 as court expenses. Romgaz to file an 
appeal by February 09, 2018 against the aforementioned Ruling. 

Autoritatea Nationala 
de Reglementare in 
Domeniul Energiei 
(Romanian National 
Regulatory Authority 
for Energy)- 
respondent 
Romgaz - plaintiff 

15 

 
 
Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

No. 

84 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

2093/102/2016 – 
Alba Iulia Court of 
Appeal  

85 

2806/85/2017- 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Annulment of act 

Trade Union 
Sindicatul Liber 
SNGN ROMGAZ 
SA- complainant 

Romgaz  - respondent 

Claims – Labor-related 
litigation 

Pepene Laurentiu - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz – Suc. 
Medias - defendant 

86 

87 

3129/85/2017       
- Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

207/102/2017 
Mures Court of 
Law  

Challenge of 
termination of 
employment 
notice/decision 

Monetary rights 

Iakab Zoltan  -  
plaintiff 

ROMGAZ  
Suc.Medias – 
defendant 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Finalized 

   On  January  10,  2017  the  court  declined  its  competency  in  favor  of 
Sibiu  County  Court  of  Law.  The  ruling  is  appealed.  Final  settlement 
resulting from dismissal of appeal filed by the complainants 

  Claims  unsettled  retirement  rights  according  to  the  Collective  Labour 

Agreement. 
Allows  the  claim  filed  by  the  plaintiff.  Compels  the  defendant  to  the 
payment of retirement allowance for a gas industry service term of 45 
years+. Ruling 1390/2017. Appeal may be filed within 10 days from the 
communication.  
Trial terminated – plaintiff deceased. Settlement in brief: case 
reinstated and establishes the date of August 21, 2017 to assess the 
stay of proceedings until the inclusion of the deceased’s legal 
successors according to 412, art. 1 Criminal Procedure Code.  

Stay of 
proceedings 

413 employees of 
SPEE Iernut - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz - defendant 

  Revision  of  monetary  rights  from  February  1,  2014  until  the  current 
date.  Stay  of  proceedings  until  de  final  settlement  of  case  file 
249/57/2016   

Stay of 
proceedings 

88 

4483/320/2017 

impleader 

Romgaz – plaintiff 

FGA (Fondul de 
garantare a 
asiguratilor) - 
defendant 

Impleader  request  separated  from  case  file  no.  11776/320/2016. 
Dismisses  the  impleader  request  filed  by  Romgaz  against  FGA  as 
inadmissible.  Right  to  file  an  appeal  within  30  days  from  the 
communication. Ruling 5197/2017  

89 

1301/85/2017 – 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Additional works 

Dafora S.A. plaintiff 

Romgaz - defendant 

1,332,000  Amendment  of  works  contract  no.  9468/16.09.2015  having  as  object 
the performance of exploration drilling works at well 1 Pocoleni Nord, 
Suceava county reflecting the extension of contract duration by 202.89 
hours and the increase of contract price by RON 1,332,000 (plus VAT) 
based on art. 14.1 of the Works Contract and on Art. 1270 New Civil 
Procedure Code – to compel of the defendant to the above-mentioned 
payment  representing  the  equivalent  value  of  additional  performed 
works due to the extension of contract term.  
-subsidiarity,  the  adjustment  of  Contract  no.9468/16.09.2015  as  a 
result of occurrence of hardship (art. 1271 par. 2 and 3 of the New Civil 
Procedure  Code)  and  in  accordance  with  article  252  letter  j)  of  GEO 

16 

 
 
 
 
 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

34/2006 in force at the contract signing date; 
-  to  compel  the  defendant  to  pay  RON  1,332,000  (plus  VAT) 
representing the equivalent value of additional performed works due to 
the extension of contract term. 
A specialized expertise in the oil and gas filed is ordered. On January 
16, 2018, the court postpones ruling. 

90 

2158/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

163,164  Romgaz – garnishee  

91 

2157/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

163,164  Romgaz – garnishee  

92 

2154/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

163,164  Romgaz – garnishee  

93 

2156/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

131,305.83  Romgaz – garnishee  

94 

2153/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

163,164  Romgaz – garnishee  

17 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 

 
 
No. 

95 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

2152/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

131,305.83  Romgaz – garnishee  

96 

2018/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

5,012.08  Romgaz – garnishee  

97 

2155/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

Drilling Equipment 
SRL – Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

163,164  Romgaz – garnishee  

98 

2097/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

SC Macro-Tur – 
Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

8,437.98  Romgaz – garnishee  

99 

2095/257/2015 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Validation of 
garnishment  

SC Macro-Tur – 
Creditor 

Dafora SA – Debtor 

40,000  Romgaz – garnishee  

100 

461/1371/2016 – 
Mures 
Commercial Court 
of Law  

Insolvency  

Romgaz: creditor 

SC InstaService SRL: 
debtor 

275,535.60 

Insolvency proceeding. 

18 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
stay of 
proceedings 
resulting 
from the 
debtor’s 
insolvency 
February 
28, 2018 

 
File No./ Court of 
Law 

589/102/2017 – 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

No. 

101 

102 

103 

5978/317/2016 
Tg. Carbunesti 
Court of Law 

104 

275/257/2017- 
competency 
declined to Mures 
County Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Monetary rights 

Romgaz – STTM 
Tg. Mures- plaintiff 

Negrea Alexandru - 
defendant 

insolvency 

696/1371/2016 – 
Tg. Mures 
Commercial Court 
of Law 

Romgaz- Suc. Tg 
Mures-creditor 

SC Best 
InstalGas&Water SRL 
- debtor 

Claims-damages 

Durla Sabina - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz-Suc. Tg. 
Mures - defendant 

Not specified  Compensation  for  loss  of  land  usage  during  2015-2016  to  be  set  by 

judicial expertise. No expertise reports were filed.  

Claims 

SC Agmus S.A. Iasi 
– plaintiff 

Romgaz-Suc. Tg. 
Mures - defendant 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Term for 
appeal not 
established 

March 8, 
2018 

February 
14, 2018 

- 

- 

14,048.62  Action in patrimonial liability of the operative employee for the damage 
of  the  company,  established  at  inventory.  Ruling  496/2017  dismisses 
civil  action.  Allows  the  defendant’s  counterclaim.  (The  plaintiff  is 
compelled to order in favor of the defendant the release of the entire 
amount retained as warranty, namely RON 1,500, as court expenses, 
dismissing other claims in connection with court expenses. 

317,66  The initial receivables amounted RON 1,214,940.44. Subsequently, the 
debtor  performed  also  the  outstanding  works  in  the  contract  and  the 
late payment penalties were recovered from the contract performance 
warranty. The remaining difference is RON 317.66. 

52,332.77  The  claims  consist  of  contract  performance  warranty  and  penalties. 
Also court fees were requested, which are not specified. The contract 
performance  was  released  and  the  plaintiff  withdrew  the  legal  action 
before the declination of competency. 
Settled  in  the  court  of  first  instance.  According  to  Ruling  666/2017 
allowed  the  defense  of  lack  of  passive  capacity  to  stand  trial  of 
Romgaz and dismissed payment ordinance request of Agmus as being 
introduced against a party with no passive capacity to stand trial. The 
Ruling  was  communicated  on  September  20,  2017  and  may  be 
attacked by request for annulment.  

17,795  The amount was not paid during March 2015-September 2016. Ruling 
4095/2017  dismissed  the  garnishment  validation  request  filed  by  the 
creditor (insolvent) through B.E.J. Ursulescu Floarea as official receiver 
against  Cozos  Petru  –  debtor  –  and  Romgaz-Suc.  Tg.  Mures  – 
garnishee  due  to  late  submission.  The  ruling  was  communicated. 
Appeal can be filed.  

9,181.48  The amount represents compensation for the loss of land usage 2014-
2016 and costs in connection with the enforcement. Settled in the court 
of first instance. Request dismissed. Right to file an appeal. 

105 

1517/320/2017- 
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law 

Validation of 
garnishment 

106 

4009/320/2017 – 
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law 

Challenge on 
enforcement 

SC Agropetruvlad 
Tg. Mures – creditor 
and B.E.J. 
Ursulescu Floarea, 
Tg. Mures 

Romgaz-Suc. Tg. 
Mures-challenger-
debtor 

Romgaz- Suc. Tg. 
Mures - garnishee 

B.E.J. Daianu 
Gheorghe – 
respondent and 
Daianu Maria 

19 

 
 
Next 
procedural 
deadline 
- 

Not 
established 

No. 

107 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

1453/330/2017 – 
Urziceni Court of 
Law 

108  Criminal Case file 
3212/257/2017 – 
Medias Court of 
Law 

109 

5202/257/2016 / 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz-Suc.Tg. 
Mures - petitioner 

Politia Urziceni - 
respondent 

Defendants (14)  
Dan Ioan, Podar 
Nicolae, Popa 
Nicolae, Serban 
Vasile Florin, 
Moldovan Sorin, 
Manciu Ioan, 
Dragomir Vicentiu 
Catalin, Chis Ciprian , 
Gyorke Aladar, 
Morariu Ovidiu Pavel, 
Biro Mihai, Nicola 
Lucian, Marinescu 
Alexandru Mircea, 
Moldovan Claudiu 
Liviu 
Bordi Adrian - 
defendant 

Medias Court of 
Law Prosecutor’s 
Office – Romgaz 
SIRCOSS – injured 
party 

Medias Court of 
Law - Prosecutor’s 
Office  
Romgaz – 
SIRCOSS – injured 
party 

Embezzlement –
continuing form and 
accessory to 
embezzlement – 
continuing form (Art. 
295 par. 1 Criminal 
Code with the 
application of Art. 35 
par. 1 Criminal Code 
art. 48 par. 1 Criminal 
Code in relation to art. 
295 par. 1 Criminal 
Code 

Medias Court of Law - 
Prosecutor’s Office 
concluded an 
agreement of admission 
of guilt with the 
defendant Bordi Adrian, 
investigated for the 
criminal offence of 
complicity to 
embezzlement in 
continuing form. The 
prosecutor refers the 
case to the competent 
court of first instance, 
Medias Court of Law. 

20 

2,000  Complaint  of  violation  against  the  Record  of  Findings.  Settled  in  the 
court of first instance. The case was scheduled for trial on August 16, 
2017  the  ruling  being  postponed  to  August  23,  2017  when  Ruling 
1143/2017 allowed the complaint of violation and annulled the Record 
of  Findings  PILY  06179  of  March  28,  2017.  Consequently,  the 
petitioner was relieved from paying the RON 2,000 fine. The ruling was 
not communicated and appeal can be filed. 

  The  criminal  prosecution  represented  the  scope  of  case  file  no. 
1278/P/2015  filed  with  Medias  Court  of  Law  Prosecutor’s  Office  – 
embezzlement. 
The case was pending before the preliminary chamber. On October 27, 
2017 the commencement of trial was ordered. 

the  defendant,  and  appeal  allowed 

  Medias Court of Law dismissed the agreement of admission of guilt by 
Ruling  10/2017.  Ruling  appealed  by  the  Medias  Court  of  Law  - 
in 
Prosecutor’s  Office  and 
20.04.2017,  thus  admitting  the  agreement  of  admission.  Alba-Iulia 
Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and the agreement of admission, 
respectively. The injured party has not concluded with the defendant a 
the  civil  action. 
mediation  or 
Depending  on  the  investigations  made  by  the  Medias  Court  of  Law  - 
Prosecutor’s  Office  regarding  the  reintroduction  in  the  main  file 
1278/P/2015 or concluding of a new agreement, corresponding actions 
shall  be  taken.  After  the  appeal  ruling  will  be  communicated,  it  is 
necessary to file a civil action to recovery the damage suffered by the 
company  because  the  injured  party  and  the  defendant  have  not 
concluded any mediation or transaction agreement regarding the civil 
action. Awaited is taking of evidence under File  3212/257/2017 to be 

transaction  agreement  regarding 

 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

used in this case as proof of damage cause by the defendant. 

Romgaz – 
SIRCOSS – injured 
party 

Lorincz Levente - 
defendant 

Romgaz – 
SIRCOSS – injured 
party 

Dragomir Vicentiu - 
defendant 

110 

5203/257/2016 / 
Medias Court of 
Law 

111 

5240/257/2016 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Medias Court of Law - 
Prosecutor’s Office 
concluded an 
agreement of admission 
of guilt with the 
defendant Bordi Adrian, 
investigated for the 
criminal offence of 
complicity to 
embezzlement in 
continuing form 

Medias Court of Law - 
Prosecutor’s Office 
concluded an 
agreement of admission 
of guilt with the 
defendant Dragomir 
Vicentiu, investigated 
for the criminal offence 
of complicity to 
embezzlement in 
continuing form 

transaction  agreement  regarding 

the  defendant,  and  appeal  allowed 

  Medias Court of Law dismissed the agreement of admission of guilt by 
Ruling  10/2017.  Ruling  appealed  by  the  Medias  Court  of  Law  - 
in 
Prosecutor’s  Office  and 
20.04.2017,  thus  admitting  the  agreement  of  admission.  Alba-Iulia 
Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and the agreement of admission, 
respectively. The injured party has not concluded with the defendant a 
mediation  or 
the  civil  action. 
Depending  on  the  investigations  made  by  the  Medias  Court  of  Law  - 
Prosecutor’s  Office  regarding  the  reintroduction  in  the  main  file 
1278/P/2015 or concluding of a new agreement, corresponding actions 
shall  be  taken.  After  the  appeal  ruling  will  be  communicated,  it  is 
necessary to file a civil action to recovery the damage suffered by the 
company  because  the  injured  party  and  the  defendant  have  not 
concluded any mediation or transaction agreement regarding the civil 
action. Awaited is taking of evidence under File  3212/257/2017 to be 
used in this case as proof of damage cause by the defendant. 

  Medias  Court  of  Law  -  Prosecutor’s  Office  has  concluded  an 
agreement of admission of guilt with the defendant Dragomir Vicentiu, 
investigated for the criminal offence of complicity to embezzlement in a 
continued  form.  The  prosecutor  referred  the  case  to  the  competent 
court  of  first  instance  for  trial,  i.e.  the  Medias  Court  of  Law,  and  that 
action  is  included  in  Case  File  5240/257/2016.  Medias  Court  of  Law 
dismissed  the  agreement  of  admission  by  Ruling  10/2017.  Ruling 
appealed  by  the  Medias  Court  of  Law  -  Prosecutor’s  Office  and  the 
defendant,  and  appeal  dismissed  in  12.04.2017,  thus  dismissing  the 
agreement of admission. Communication of ruling is awaited. 
The injured party has not concluded with the defendant a mediation or 
transaction agreement regarding the civil action, and depending on the 
investigations made by the Medias Court of Law - Prosecutor’s Office 
regarding the reintroduction in the main file 1278/P/2015 or concluding 
a new agreement, corresponding actions shall be taken.  

21 

 
 
 
 
No. 

112 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

5223/257/2016 
Medias Court of 
Law 

113 

928/85/2016 
County Court of 
Sibiu 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

Medias Court of Law - 
Prosecutor’s Office 
concluded an 
agreement of admission 
of guilt with the 
defendant Morariu 
Ovidiu Pavel, 
investigated for the 
criminal offence of 
complicity to 
embezzlement in 
continuing form 
Labor  related litigation 
Challenge of dismissal 
decision 

Romgaz – 
SIRCOSS – injured 
party 

Morariu Ovidiu Pavel  
defendant 

for 

investigated 

the  criminal  offence  of  complicity 

  The  Medias  Court  of  Law  -  Prosecutor’s  Office  has  concluded  an 
agreement  of  admission  of  guilt  with  the  defendant  Morariu  Ovidiu 
Pavel, 
to 
embezzlement in continuing form. The prosecutor referred the case to 
the competent court of first instance for trial, i.e. the Medias  Court of 
Law,  and  that  action  is  included  in  Case  File  5223/257/2016.  Medias 
Court of Law dismissed the agreement of admission by Ruling 2/2017. 
The injured party has not concluded with the defendant a mediation or 
transaction agreement regarding the civil action, and depending on the 
investigations made by the Medias Court of Law - Prosecutor’s Office 
regarding the reintroduction in the main file 1278/P/2015 or concluding 
a new agreement, corresponding actions shall be taken. 

Dan Ioan - 
Challenger 

Romgaz – SIRCOSS 
- Respondent 

  On the hearing of September 05, 2016, the Court ordered the stay of 
proceedings until the final settlement of the file, the ruling of which shall 
be decisive in the settlement of this case. 

Stay of 
proceedings 

114 

927/85/2016 
County Court of 
Sibiu 

Labor  related litigation 
Challenge of dismissal 
decision 

Podar Nicolae - 
Challenger 

Romgaz – SIRCOSS 
-  Respondent 

  On  the  hearing  of  October  13,  2016,  the  Court  ordered  the  stay  of 
proceedings until the final settlement of the file, the ruling of which shall 
be decisive in the settlement of this case. 

Stay of 
proceedings 

115 

944/85/2016 
County Court of 
Sibiu 

Labor  related litigation 
Challenge of dismissal 
decision 

Lorincz Levente  - 
Challenger 

Romgaz – SIRCOSS 
-  Respondent 

  On  the  hearing  of  September  6,  2016,  the  Court  ordered  the  stay  of 
proceedings until the final settlement of the file, the ruling of which shall 
be decisive in the settlement of this case. 

Stay of 
proceedings 

116 

9741/320/2016 
Tg. Mures Court 
of Law.  In  appeal  
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Complaint of violation 
Annulment of record of 
findings fining the 
company for lack of 
tachograph 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS – 
Challenger 

IPJ  Mures  -
Respondent 

4,000 

The Court of First Instance dismissed as unfounded the complaint of 
violation filed by the complainant ROMGAZ, in contradiction with the 
respondent IPJ Mures, and as a consequence it allows the Record of 
Findings series PMSX no. 0123915/26.07.2016 as legally and duly 
prepared. Right to appeal within 30 days of communication. Request 
for appeal filed with Tg Mures Court of Law. Ruling made in 
accordance with Art. 396 paragraph 2 Civil Procedure Code as of 
27.01.2017. Ruling 468/ 2017. Appeal recorded on March 24, 2017. 
Appeal to be settled at Mures County Court of Law. On the hearing of 
December 15, 2017 the Court requested the provision of evidence of 

22 

 
 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

documents belonging to IPJ Mures. 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

117 

2206/85/2009/ a1 
2 Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Challenging the 
insolvency procedure. 
Claims: performance 
guarantee 

SC GRANIT SRL by  
liquidator CITR 
S.P.R.L. -
Challenger 

Romgaz – SIRCOSS / 
Respondent 

  SC GRANIT SRL, being in the winding up process (bankruptcy) claims 
the  release  of  the  remaining  amount  (30%)  of  the  performance 
guarantee  issued  in  favor  of  SIRCOSS  (valid  guarantee)  by  Patria 
Bank, the former NEXTEBANK S.A. 

Obsolete  
 Ruling 
549/18.09.2
017 

118 

3421/85/2017 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

Labor  related litigation 
Recovery of undue 
amounts 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS –  
plaintiff 

Deac Horatiu Teodor 
(former employee) - 
defendant 

119 

2307/257/2016 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 
against a fine penalty 
for lack of ROvignette 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS –  
petitioner 

CNADNR – CESTRIN 
- Respondent 

120 

4253/257/2016 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 
against a fine penalty 
for lack of ROvignette 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS –  
petitioner 

CNAIR former 
CNADNR – CESTRIN 
- Respondent 

121 

122 

1571/257/2017  
Medias Court of 
Law 
under appeal 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 
3339/257/2017 
Medias Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 
against a fine penalty 
for lack of ROvignette 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS –  
petitioner 

CNAIR former 
CNADNR – CESTRIN 
- Respondent 

Complaint of violation 
against a fine penalty 
for lack of RO vignette 

ROMGAZ-
SIRCOSS –  
petitioner 

CNAIR former 
CNADNR – CESTRIN 
- Respondent 

  Recovery of undue amount. Status of litigation: filed in  June 06,2017. 
Settled as of November 16, 2017 by allowing the action and compelling 
Mr.  Deac  Horatiu  to  pay  the  amount  of  2,746  RON.  Ruling  under 
appeal. 

Not 
established 

3,000  Claims:  Record  of  Findings  No  R16  0294469/07.06.2016,  mainly 
annulment  of  fine  or,  alternatively,  replacement  of  fine  with  warning. 
Complaint  dismissed  by 
Instance,  Ruling 
1374/10.10.2016. 
Status  of  litigation:  Appeal  dismissed  29.06.2017  Ruling  855/2017 
(Sibiu  County  Court  of  Law).  Ruling  communicated  to  the  Economic 
Department. Amounts are being recovered. 

the  Court  of  First 

2,750  Claims:  converting  the  fine  penalty  into  warning,  Record  of  Findings 
R16  0416380/30.08.2016.  Complaint  dismissed  by  the  Court  of  First 
Instance, Ruling 2036/15.12.2016. 
Status  of  litigation:  Appeal  dismissed  on  21.09.2017.  Ruling  to  be 
communicated 

250  Claims:  converting  the  fine  penalty  into  warning,  Record  of  Findings 

R17 0148052/21.02.2017.  
Status  of  litigation:  Complaint  dismissed  on  19.06.2017.  Ruling 
1434/2017 to be communicated. Appeal filed on 11.09.2017 

Finalized; 
amount of 
RON 1,415 
to be 
recovered 
January 26, 
2018 

2,750  Claims:  converting  the  fine  penalty  into  warning,  Record  of  Findings 
R17/0346605/13.06.2017.  Complaint  dismissed  by  the  Court  of  First 
Instance as of 04.10.2017, Ruling 1950/04.10.2017. 
Ruling  to  be  communicated.  Right  to  appeal  within  30  days  of 
communication. Appeal filed 

Not 
established 

23 

 
 
 
 
No. 

123 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

10073/63/2015* 
Dolj County Court 
of Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Claims 

Paunescu Dan S.A. 
- plaintiff 

Transgaz, Romgaz 
Ploiesti - defendant 

EUR60,000 

compensation payment for loss of land usage due to the undercrossing 
by the ND 300 Clapeta-SDE pipeline  

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
January 16, 
2018 

124 

31572/215/2015 
Craiova Court of 
Law 

Claims 

Dica Viorel -  
plaintiff 

Romgaz Ploiesti - 
defendant 

16,500  Compensation payment for loss of easement right due to the Ghercesti 
Cluster 7. A topographic and agricultural expertise was ordered. 

February 
14, 2018 

125 

900/105/2016 
Prahova  

Claims 

Romgaz Ploiesti - 
plaintiff 

Filip Gheorghe - 
defendant 

673  Labor related litigation to recover the amount of 673 RON; equivalent 

value of undue days of leave. Action allowed 

Enforcement 
request filed 

126 

11305/215/2017- 
Craiova Court of 
Law 

Establishment of 
easement right+claims 

Irimescu Simona-
plaintiff 

Romgaz Suc. Ploiesti-
defendant 

6,000  The  plaintiff  requests  a  right  of  access  to  the  land  where  well  211 
Ghercesti is located. She also claims that she cannot construct on this 
privately-owned land because of existing pipelines.  

February 
12, 2018 

127 

53/1285/2017- 
Cluj County 
Specialized Court 
of Law 

Insolvency  

Romgaz – Suc 
Ploiesti - creditor 

SC Energon 
Power&Gas SRL - 
debtor 

318,135.78  Request for admission of RON 318,135.78 debt. The request filed by 
the  interim  official  receiver  Societate  Redresare  Lichidare  SPRL  was 
allowed and the simplified insolvency of SCE.P.&G. SRL as well as its 
winding up was ordered. 

March 13, 
2018 

128 

28104/281/2016- 
Ploiesti Court of 
Law 

Specific performance, 
damages 

Fundatia Semper 
Fidelis Domus 
Bucuresti - plaintiff 

Romgaz – Suc. 
Ploiesti - defendant 

2,000/annum/pa
st 3 years 

Request to deviate the gathering pipeline PN 150 Butimanu-Bilciuresti 
and to demolish constructions erected without construction permit.  

January 12, 
2018 

129 

774/105/2016- 
Prahova Court of 
Law 

Establishment of 
occupational category 

Stan Gheorghe - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz Suc. Ploiesti 
SC Rompetrol S.A. - 
defendant 

  Labor-related  litigation  for  establishment  of  occupational  category  I. 
Action  was  partially  allowed.  Action  in  relation  to  Romgaz  was 
dismissed. Ruling 2073/2017. Right to file an appeal. 

24 

 
 
No. 

130 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

3246/317/2017 Tg 
Carbunesti Court 
of Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz-Suc. Tg. 
Mures – petitioner 

I.T.M. Gorj - 
respondent 

3,500  Complaint  of  violation  against  the  Record  of  Findings.  Allows  the 

complaint. Right to file an appeal. 

131 

4199/85/2017 – 
Sibiu County 
Court of Law 

claims 

SC Develtor SRL- 
plaintiff 

Romgaz- defendant 

132 

1885/93/2015- 
Ilfov County Court 
of Law 

Administrative court – 
annulment of 
administrative 
document  

Romgaz – Suc. 
Ploiesti 
SC Rompetrol S.A. 
plaintiff 

Ilfov Prefect’s Office 
Cernica Commune 
City Hall - defendants 

2,920,371.34  The plaintiff requests the court to compel the defendant to the payment 
of RON 2,920,371.34 (plus VAT) representing the equivalent value of 
additional works performed by the plaintiff in phases II, III and IV and of 
the pieces of equipment used additionally for the performance of works 
at well Radeni 1, in accordance with the work contract no. 11197/2016  
  The plaintiff requested the partial annulment of the Prefect’s Oder no. 
for  a 
the  usage  category 
545/2009  whereby 
10,730sq.m.  land  was  established.  The  land  relates  to  some  of  its 
investment.  This  action  was  filed  because  due  to  the  change  from 
“arable” usage category, proceedings relating to the certification of title 
for the above-specified land could not be continued. 

“pasture-land” 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Not 
established 

February 
13, 2018 

February 
07, 2018 

133 

2279/327/2017 
Tulcea County 
Court of Law 

134 

4720/2/2017 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

claims 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

Crisan Commune City 
Hall - defendant 

10,000  The  court  was  requested  to  establish  the  unilateral  termination  of 

sponsorship contract no. 34667/2015 and the refund of RON 10,000. 

January 29, 
2018 

Annulment of decision 

Romgaz Petitioner 

FGA - respondent 

  Romgaz  filed  a  reexamination  request  given  Minute  no.  34667/2015 
whereby  the  annulment  of  the  challenge  was  ordered  on  grounds  of 
missing stamp duty. 

February 
20, 2018 

135 

7034/303/2014 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

Garnishment validation 
- appeal 

Romgaz creditor 

100,615,007.42 
according to 
Civil ruling 
no.3279/2011 – 
enforceable 

According to Civil Ruling1492/2016, the courts of first instance allowed 
the  garnishment  validation  request  filed  by  Romgaz  against  the 
garnishee.  Interagro  and  the  garnishees  filed  an  appeal.  The  Minute 
dated  November  2,  2016  ordered  the  stay  of  appeals  on  grounds  of 
non-compliance  with  all  obligations  established  for  the  respondents. 
The stay of proceedings is valid at present. 

Stay of 
proceedings 

SC Interagro SA – 
debtor 
SC Energy 
Cogeneration; Bio 
Fuel Energy, 
Fish&Fish Prodcom 
Inter-Sport Assets, 
Cotidianul Curentul, 
Inter Tourism 
Management,  Power 
Plant Fagaras, 

25 

 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

136 

6838/303/2014 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

Garnishment validation 
- appeal 

Romgaz creditor 

Scorpions Construct, 
Giurgiu 
BiomassHet&Power, 
Interagro Exploration - 
garnishee 
SC Interagro SA – 
debtor 
SC TM Power SA, 
Asirom Leasing IFN, 
Cotidianul Curentul, 
IFN INT, Intercereal – 
garnishee 

137 

34079/303/2015 
Sector 6 
Bucharest Court 
of Law 

Challenge on 
enforcement 

138 

36095/3/2015 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

insolvency 

Interagro - petitioner  Romgaz, Agricolferm 

SRL, BEJ Cristian 
Milos – respondent 

Interagro - debtor 

Romgaz – creditor 
Creditors included 
in the preliminary 
table of receivables 

139 

8453/2/2016 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

Challenge of 
administrative 
document 

Romgaz - claimant 

ANAF Brasov -
respondent 

26 

100,615,007.42 
according to 
Civil ruling 
no.3279/2011 – 
enforceable 

According to Civil Ruling 8486/2015, the court of first instance allowed 
the  garnishment  validation  request  filed  by  Romgaz  against  the 
garnishee.  Interagro  and  the  garnishees  filed  an  appeal.  The  Minute 
dated September 02, 2016 ordered the stay of file because against the 
debtor  insolvency  proceedings  were  initiated  according  to  case  file 
36095/3/2015. The stay of proceedings is valid at present. 

Stay of 
proceedings 

100,615,007.42 
according to 
Civil ruling 
no.3279/2011 – 
enforceable 

Challenge on enforcement against the tendering minutes relating to the 
construction  located  in  Bucharest,  sector  6,  Apusului  Str.,  no.50 
belonging to the debtor concluded in the enforcement file no. 28/2014 
of  BEJ  Cristian  Milos.  The  request  is  found  obsolete.  Right  to  file  a 
recourse. 

284,208,986.85  The  receivable  to  be  included  in  the  body  of  creditors  is  of  RON 
284,208,986.85  and  is  included  in  the  table  of  receivables.  The 
insolvency  procedure  is  in  observation  phase.  At  the  end  of  the  fist 
Creditors’  Assembly  held  on  May  16,  2016,  the  Creditors’  Committee 
was  appointed  formed  by  Pireus  Bank,  Romgaz,  Banca  Transilvania, 
Intercereal and EON Energie. 
CITR Ilfov subsidiary was conformed as Official Receiver. 
Following the settlement of challenges to the preliminary table, the final 
table  is  to  be  drafted  and  to  make  a  decision  regarding  the  debtor’s 
reorganization or performance of bankruptcy procedures. 
2,980,868  The  Court  of  Appeal  dismissed  the  summons  on  inadmissibility 
grounds because of the unlawful statute of limitations to establish fiscal 
obligations  and  because  of  lack  of  grounds  for  the  remaining  part. 
(Ruling 1836/May 19, 2017). Against this decision, a recourse was filed 
on May 25, 2017. At present the decision of the court of first instance is 
not  communicated.  The  memorandum  containing  the  reasons  for 
recourse is to be drafted after the communication of the decision.   

February 
19, 2018 

Not 
established 

 
 
 
Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Stay of 
proceedings 

February 
22, 2018 

No. 

140 

141 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

4271/85/2017 
Bucharest Court 
of Appeal 

1692/1/2017/a1 
High Court of 
Cassation and 
Justice 

142 

143 

1692/1/2017/A1/a
1 High Court of 
Cassation and 
Justice 

1980/1/2017 
High Court of 
Cassation and 
Justice 

144 

1692/1/2017/a1.2 
High Court of 
Cassation and 
Justice 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

Tort liability 
proceedings 

Romgaz plaintiff 

Piteiu Maria Iuliana, 
Piteiu Vladimir – 
defendants 

282,630,330.49 
(rough 
estimation) 

Tort  liability  proceedings  initiated  against  the  legal  successors  for 
maintaining  precautionary  measures  established 
the  criminal 
prosecution  file  no.  146/D/P/2010  in  relation  to  the  property  of  the 
deceased Marcel Adrian Piteiu 

in 

282,630,330.49 
(rough 
estimation) 

Directions hearings. Ruling is postponed 

Directions hearings 

Romgaz-civil party 

NICULAE IOAN 
VIDEANU ADRIEAN - 
MIREA MARIN - 
ALESANDRU DAN- 
VICTOR - 
PALASCA VIOREL -  
APAN IOANA -  
KRAMER ALPAR -  
TOTH FRANCISC -  
STANCU LUCIAN 
ADRIAN -  
VEZA MARIUS 
LEONTE -  
IONASCU LUCIA -  
SC INTERAGRO SA -  

Maintaining 
precautionary measures 

Romgaz – civil party  Piteiu Maria Iuliana, 

Piteiu Vladimir – 
defendants 

Lifting precautionary 
measures 

Piteiu Maria Iuliana, 
Piteiu Vladimir – 
petitioners 

Romgaz – civil party 

282,630,330.49 
(rough 
estimation) 

282,630,330.49 
(rough 
estimation) 

Lifting precautionary 
measures 

Romgaz – civil party  Barbu Florin Andrei 

– petitioner 
Interagro -defendant 

282,630,330.49 
(rough 
estimation) 

27 

On the trial date of September 15, 2017, the file was enclosed in case 
file no. 1980/2017.  

On  the  trial  date  of  September  15,  2017,  the  court  dismissed  as 
unfounded the petitioner’s claim to lift precautionary measures (distrain 
upon  property)  established  by  Ordinance  146/D/P/2010  of  June  8, 
2012  of  the  High  Court  of  Cassation  and  Justice  Prosecutor’s  Office 
and the request filed by Romgaz – civil party – for the establishment of 
the same measures, due to loss of scope. The petitioner and the civil 
party are each compelled to pay RON 100 as court fees. Final ruling. 
Lifting  precautionary  measures.  Dismisses  the  challenge  filed  by  the 
petitioner  against  the  lifting  of  precautionary  measures  (distrain  upon 
property)  established  by  Ordinance  146/D/P/2010  of  September  2, 
2016  of  the  High  Court  of  Cassation  and  Justice  –  Criminal  Offence  
Investigation  Department  (…)  regarding  the  construction  of  32,500 

 
 
 
 
No. 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

sq.m. located in Nanov, Teleorman County (…). Compels the petitioner 
to  the  payment  of  RON  200  representing  legal  expenses.  The  RON 
130  honorary  for  the  appointed  defense  of  Interagro  is  paid  from  the 
Ministry of Justice funds. Ruling given in October 19, 2017. Final. 

145 

3098/2518/2017 
Ludus Court of 
Law 

Complaint of violation 

Romgaz-SPEE 
Iernut - petitioner 

ANRE - defendant 

4,000 (half of 
minimum range 
of value) 

Complaint of violation against Record of Findings 84958/2017, fine 50 
000  art.  93  par  (2)  point  2,  letter  a)  of  Law  123/2012,  for  “non-
transmittal of data requested correctly and completely”  

146 

4270/102/2017 
Mures County 
Court of Law 

Damages  

Negrea Alexandru 
Stelian - plaintiff 

Romgaz STTM - 
defendant 

147 

32542/3/2017 
Bucharest County 
Court of Law 

claims 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

SC C-Gaz &Energy 
Distributie SRL 
Bucuresti –defendant 

30,000  The plaintiff filed a civil action to compel Romgaz STTM to the payment 
of RON 30,000 as civil damages for the moral prejudice and to relating 
legal interest from the date of filing the action until the actual payment 
thereof. The court set the first trial date. 

1,109,398.89  Romgaz requests that the defendant is compelled to: 

- 

- 

- 

taken,  as  outlined 

Payment  of  RON  1,089,351.21  as  unpaid  price  for  gas 
contracted  and  not 
invoices 
40401160/09.05.2017, no. 40401161/10.04.2017 
Payment  of  RON  20,047.68  as  legal  interest  relating  to  the 
debit  calculated  until  July  31,  2017  and  further  on  the 
payment of legal interest until the full restitution of the main 
debit. 
Payment of legal expenses. 

in 

Next 
procedural 
deadline 

File 
recorded on 
December 
28/2017 

February 
20, 2018 

March 01, 
2018 

148 

30568/325/2017 
Timisoara Court 
of Law 

Claims  

Romgaz-SIRCOSS 
plaintiff 

SC ETA 
AUTOMATIZARI 
INDUSTRIALE SRL 
defendant 

74,524.7  To  compel  the  defendant  to  the  payment  of  RON  74,524.7  plus  late 

payment penalties 

Not 
established 

149 

13745/63/2017 
Dolj County Court 
of Law 

Reimbursement of 
undue payment 

Romgaz - plaintiff 

SC Foraj Sonde SA 
Craiova - defendant 

10,972 (judicial 
stamp duty) 

Action  filed  for  the  reimbursement  of  undue  payments  Declines 
competency in favor of Sibiu Court of Law. 
No right to recourse/appeal. Ruling 35/2018 

Not 
established 

28 

 
No. 

150 

File No./ Court of 
Law 

Case 

Plaintiff 

Defendant 

Amount              
(RON) 

Description 

5362/317/2017 
Tg Carbunesti 
Court of Law 

Action for recovery of 
possession of real 
property  

Jianu Dumitru - 
plaintiff 

Romgaz Suc. Tg. 
Mures - defendant 

  The summons was received on January 18, 2018. Within the legal 25 

days term a statement of defense is to be filed.  

Next 
procedural 
deadline 
Not 
established 

29