Quarterlytics / Technology / Spectra Systems Corporation / FY2016 Annual Report

Spectra Systems Corporation
Annual Report 2016

SPSY · LSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker SPSY
Exchange LSE
Sector Technology
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Spectra Systems Corporation
Loading PDF…
S

p

e

c

t

r

a

S

y

s

t

e

m

s

C

o

r

p

o

r

a

t

i

o

n

A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

1

6

A leading provider 
of advanced 
technology-based 
security solutions

Spectra Systems Corporation
Annual report and accounts 2016

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Spectra Systems Corporation  
is an established world leader  
in providing security technology, 
from banknotes and products  
to electronic gaming.

Spectra provides integrated solutions comprised 
of engineered materials for authentication and 
hardware and software systems which verify the 
unique signatures of the authentication materials.

WE OPERATE IN 
35 COUNTRIES

OVER 60 
CUSTOMERS

FOUR 
ACQUISITIONS 
SINCE 2012

WE HAVE  
29 STAFF IN  
OUR OFFICES

Highlights

Financial highlights

Operational highlights

 – Revenue of US$11.1 million (2015: US$14.1 million)

 –  Adjusted EBITDA up 123% at US$2.4 million1 

(2015: US$1.1 million1)

 –  In-house manufacturing for G7 central bank 
commenced in Q4 with a 35% uplift to gross 
profits going forward

 –  Adjusted PBTA up 184% at US$2.0 million1 

(2015: US$0.7 million1)

 –  Adjusted EBITDA per share up over 100% 

at US$0.05 (2015: US$0.02)

 –  Adjusted PBTA per share up over 100% 

at US$0.04 (2015: US$0.2)

 –  US$2.8 million of cash generated from 

operations (2015: US$0.5 million consumed)

 –  Completed the acquisition and full 

integration of specialty phosphor assets 
and customer relationships

 –  Phosphor sales exceeded 2015 by 211%, 

with 115% of the increase due to a new sales 
channel not associated with the acquisition

 –  Brand authentication sales remained strong 

and at forecasted levels

 –  Secure Transactions Group performed in line 

 –  Strong balance sheet with cash of US$8.8 million 

with expectations

(2015: US$9.8 million) at 31 December2

 –  Inaugural annual dividend of US$0.05 per share 

to be paid in June

1  Before stock compensation expense and exceptional items.

2   Does not include US$1.1 million (2015: US$1.1 million) of restricted 

and investment cash.

 – Cost reductions through reduced R&D in 2016

 –  Cost reduction plan through staffing realignments 
and facility consolidation in 2017 with full impact 
in 2018

Revenue  
(US$ million)

11.1

(2015: 14.1)

.

9
6
1

1
.
4
1

Adjusted EBITDA 
(US$ million)

Adjusted EBITDA per share 
(US$)

2.4

(2015: 1.1)

0.05

(2015: 0.02)

4
2

.

1
.
2

5
0
0

.

5
0
0

.

1
.
1
1

1
.
1

2
0
0

.

14

15

16

14

15

16

14

15

16

Review of the year
IFC  Corporate statement
1 
2 
4  Our strategy
6 

Highlights
Spectra at a glance

 Chief Executive Officer’s 
statement

Corporate governance
 Board of Directors 
10 
and senior management

12  Directors’ report

Independent auditors’ report

Financial statements
16 
17  Balance sheets
18 

19 

 Statements of income and 
other comprehensive income
 Statements of 
stockholders’ equity
20  Statements of cash flows
21 

 Notes to the 
financial information
 Shareholder and 
corporate information

33 

Discover more online
www.spsy.com

Our strategy
Page 4

Chief Executive 
Officer’s statement
Page 6

1

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Review of the yearSpectra at a glance
Spectra is a highly responsive organization 
that develops customized solutions for 
its customers.

Our customers

Our end customers include a G7 
central bank organization and one of 
the world’s largest commercial security 
printers and papermakers, which 
supplies the Company’s technology 
to a second G7 central bank and 
numerous other central banks.

Our solutions are used by:

 – 19 central banks;

 –  commercial security printers and papermakers;

 – Crane & Co.;

 – national lotteries in six countries;

 –  suppliers of security threads for world currencies;

 – Intralot SA;

 – Scientific Games International inc.;

 – GTECH S.p.A.;

 – Governments of Turkey, India, Malaysia, 

Norway and Mexico; and

 – 16 states within the US, including Puerto Rico.

Our solutions

Authentication systems

Spectra’s sophisticated capabilities allow us to invent,  
develop and manufacture integrated solutions comprised 
of a system of taggant materials and sensor equipment 
to authenticate banknotes at high processing speeds.

Our solutions are used by:

 – two G7 central banks;

 – 17 other central banks for currency authentication; and

 – a major G7 country for passport security.

Secure transactions

Spectra’s Secure Transactions Group is the leading 
supplier of real-time fraud control and risk management 
systems to government-sanctioned gaming operators.  
Currently deployed in North America, Europe and Asia, 
our integrity systems monitor and audit more than 
US$20 billion in annual sales for online, internet and 
mobile phone-based lotteries and pari-mutuel organizations.

Our products have been engineered to provide:

 – fully automated independent real-time monitoring; and

 – compatibility with all gaming systems.

Smartphone authentication of product brands

TruBrand™ and TruNote™
Spectra’s new technology enables end users to 
verify products and banknotes with a smartphone. 
This technology eliminates the need for costly 
readers and allows the consumer to authenticate 
the product themselves.

 – TruBrand™ and TruNote™ are materials-based 

technologies that do not rely on images.

Banknote cleaning

Spectra’s new technology has the potential to substantially 
reduce central bank costs and environmental impact of 
disposing of soiled banknotes. Two United States (US) 
patents on the use of supercritical fluids for cleaning 
and decontaminating banknotes in circulation were 
issued in 2015.

2

Spectra Systems Corporation 
Annual report and accounts 2016

We have integrated our TruBrandTM cloud-based 
authentication services into the Secure Transactions 
Group to create an important new growth channel 
for the Group as the smartphone authentication 
technology gains traction.

ICS 

Expanding its authentication  
of secure transactions

Spectra has recently expanded its 
authentication of secure transactions 
beyond physical banknotes with its secure 
internal control system (ICS) software 
platforms and is an established security 
provider for the worldwide gaming industry.

Our ICS software provide methods for 
fraud, money laundering and match fixing 
detection, as well as statistical analysis, 
and have many existing parallel applications 
used by the securities exchange industry.

Smartphone authentication 
of product brands 

TruBrand™ and TruNote™

Spectra’s new technology enables 
end users to verify product and banknote 
authenticity with a smartphone. Embedded 
in printed and holographic labels, TruBrandTM 
presents a covert materials-based signature 
for detection and analysis on the smartphone 
using cloud-based authentication.

3

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Review of the yearOur strategy
Developing and acquiring for the future.

Our solutions

Strategic aim

Development strategy

Progress

Capitalize on 
existing suite of 
developed covert 
materials products

Future development of covert materials 
and sensors will be externally funded

Advanced smartphone 
authentication 
technology

Leverage TruBrandTM smartphone 
technology to create new revenue 
streams for both materials as well 
as the Secure Transactions Group

Proposal issued for the joint development 
and licensing of a polymer banknote 
technology by a major printer of banknotes

Proposal issued for the development 
and supply of further upgraded sensor 
capability to a G7 central bank in response 
to a standardization requirement

Trials underway with large tobacco 
supplier in Asia

Increase high margin 
specialty materials sales

Develop and acquire specialty phosphor 
and taggants for authentication

Acquired specialty phosphor company 
in January 2016

Develop new TruBrandTM taggants

Internal development and licensing 
of novel phosphors

Increased phosphor sales beyond 
US banknotes into Asia and Europe 
through partners

Implement 
cost reductions

Identify areas for cost savings in both 
infrastructure and staff composition

Restructuring of staff is underway

Consolidating operations upon the 
expiration of a property lease in mid-2017

Seeking lower cost materials or price 
reductions from suppliers

4

New opportunities include G7 

and other central banks

Penetration into the polymer banknote 

market through licensing agreements 

The successful production-scale 

testing and consummation of our 

TruBrandTM taggants by a large 

tobacco supplier in Asia, leading 

to sales in late 2018

The utilization of the Secure 

Transactions Group for cloud-based 

server authentication of TruBrandTM

The sale of our smartphone 

technology TruNoteTM for the 

authentication of banknotes

New sales channel for our specialty 

phosphor materials to a banknote 

security thread manufacturer 

Incorporation of phosphors in our 

smartphone products

Increased opportunities with 

long-standing customers

The benefits of reduced staffing 

and leased space is expected to 

be realized in 2018

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Capitalize on 

existing suite of 

developed covert 

materials products

Future development of covert materials 

Proposal issued for the joint development 

and sensors will be externally funded

and licensing of a polymer banknote 

technology by a major printer of banknotes

Proposal issued for the development 

and supply of further upgraded sensor 

capability to a G7 central bank in response 

to a standardization requirement

Trials underway with large tobacco 

supplier in Asia

Advanced smartphone 

authentication 

technology

Leverage TruBrandTM smartphone 

technology to create new revenue 

streams for both materials as well 

as the Secure Transactions Group

Increase high margin 

specialty materials sales

Develop and acquire specialty phosphor 

Acquired specialty phosphor company 

and taggants for authentication

in January 2016

Develop new TruBrandTM taggants

Internal development and licensing 

of novel phosphors

Increased phosphor sales beyond 

US banknotes into Asia and Europe 

through partners

Implement 

cost reductions

Identify areas for cost savings in both 

Restructuring of staff is underway

infrastructure and staff composition

Consolidating operations upon the 

expiration of a property lease in mid-2017

Seeking lower cost materials or price 

reductions from suppliers

Outlook

New opportunities include G7 
and other central banks

Penetration into the polymer banknote 
market through licensing agreements 

The successful production-scale 
testing and consummation of our 
TruBrandTM taggants by a large 
tobacco supplier in Asia, leading 
to sales in late 2018

The utilization of the Secure 
Transactions Group for cloud-based 
server authentication of TruBrandTM

The sale of our smartphone 
technology TruNoteTM for the 
authentication of banknotes

New sales channel for our specialty 
phosphor materials to a banknote 
security thread manufacturer 

Incorporation of phosphors in our 
smartphone products

Increased opportunities with 
long-standing customers

The benefits of reduced staffing 
and leased space is expected to 
be realized in 2018

Our markets

Spectra’s market opportunity has expanded once more 
with the introduction of our smartphone authentication 
solutions for products, tax stamps and banknotes. The ability 
to empower anyone with a smartphone to authenticate 
products and banknotes containing our materials transforms 
the market.

Our TruBrand™, TruStamp™ and TruNote™ suite of solutions are the only 
materials-based smartphone authentication technologies in the world 
and rely on our proprietary materials. This is a powerful combination 
of new and disruptive technologies introduced by one company, which, 
in the span of two years, has gone from concept to market-ready products 
for sale and under test by large volume tobacco suppliers in Asia.

Spectra’s current suite of portable reader-based solutions can be used 
for authenticating and tracking consumer and tax-bearing products. 
Our reader based business has grown considerably in Asia and has 
several recognizable brand owners as customers.

With over 150 billion banknotes manufactured annually worldwide 
and 85% of all transactions performed using banknotes, this business 
has proven to be a high quality, long-term revenue source for the Company. 
With 19 central bank customers and new developed technologies, 
particularly for polymer banknotes, we expect continued strong 
earnings from this sector.

The worldwide replacement of unfit banknotes has a cost approaching 
US$10 billion annually. This, along with the increasing demands for 
governments to reduce costs, is a business case for our banknote 
cleaning technology, Aeris™. Aeris™ has the potential to generate 
significant hardware sales with ongoing service revenue once the long 
central bank sales cycle plays out. Aeris™ has no competition and, now 
that patents have been issued, the market is ours exclusively.

Spectra’s secure ICS software products have been augmented with 
new capabilities since the acquisitions and have resulted in revenue 
growth with existing customers as well as with new ones. Along 
with the expansion in internet-based lotteries, we expect to provide 
cloud-based authentication for a potentially large number of customers 
using our materials-based TruBrand™, TruStamp™ and TruNote™ 
smartphone authentication.

5

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Review of the yearChief Executive Officer’s statement
Through achieving key commercial 
milestones, Spectra has substantially 
improved its performance in 2016.

Introduction
For the second year running, Spectra has generated 
significant EBITDA, up over 100% relative to 2015 
(before stock compensation expense and exceptional 
items). This steep growth was driven by increased use of 
our in-house manufacturing for a contracted G7 central bank 
customer, as well as a new central bank end customer for our 
high margin phosphor materials. In-house manufacturing was 
in effect for the last quarter of 2016 and will continue for the 
duration of the contract to beyond 2026. Both of these revenue 
streams are sales of consumables to large central bank end 
customers, as opposed to more intermittent hardware revenue, 
and are therefore expected to continue to fuel profitability 
in the long term.

With the Company having reached sustainable profits and 
having sufficient resources to execute on its growth plans 
with its existing cash reserves, the Board is delighted to start 
paying dividends. Its dividend policy will take account of the 
Group’s profitability and underlying growth, and the maintenance 
of sufficient cash reserves. The Board intends to distribute 
substantially all of the Company’s profits until its year-end 
unrestricted cash balances have fallen to approximately 
US$5 million, whereupon it intends to pay dividends twice 
covered by earnings. It therefore intends to pay an inaugural 
annual dividend of US$0.05 per share on or about June 30, 2017 
to shareholders of record as of June 9, 2017 and thereafter 
to pay an annual dividend as described above in June after 
the audited close of each financial year.

In addition to these high performing revenue streams, we 
had a solid performance from our brand authentication and 
gaming software business lines, and our newest authentication 
product for materials-based smartphone authentication won 
its first customer in 2016, which resulted in successful trials 
with other potentially very large customers in Asia.

Revenue for the year was US$11.1 million (2015: US$14.1 million). 
EBITDA for the year, before stock compensation expense and 
exceptional items, as a result of the above factors, was up 123% 
at US$2.4 million, compared to the prior year at US$1.1 million.

Having generated cash from operations of US$2.8 million 
(2015: US$0.5 million consumed), cash at the period 
end amounted to US$8.8 million (2015: US$9.8 million), 
excluding US$1.1 million of restricted and investment cash 
(2015: US$1.1 million). This is notwithstanding US$3.1 million 
expended on the phosphor assets acquisition.

The Company therefore has sufficient resources to execute 
on its growth plans with its existing cash reserves.

Review of operations

Authentication Systems
The Authentication Systems Group, which includes the security 
phosphor materials, generated revenue of US$9.8 million 
(2015: US$12.8 million) and adjusted EBITDA of US$1.9 million 
(2015: US$1.1 million). The fall-off in revenue relative to 2015 is 
associated with the final delivery of sensors to a G7 central 
bank in 2015. The increased earnings in 2016 reflect the success 
we have had in greatly increasing high margin materials sales 
of our security phosphor materials as well as the realization 
of a long-term increase in gross profit from the in-house 
manufacturing of our covert materials sold to a G7 central bank 
and another 18 central banks through a licensing arrangement.

6

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016The Company’s strategy for increasing 
revenue and earnings is shifting towards 
brand authentication markets while 
continuing to expand our banknote 
business through licensing and the sale 
of already developed technologies.

Achievements included:

 – Acquisition and integration of a security phosphor 

company in February 2016 without new hires.

 – Record sales of security phosphors with a new large 

central bank as the end customer.

 – In-house manufacturing of covert materials for a 

G7 central bank.

 – Continued strong brand authentication sales of US$1.5 million 

(2015: US$1.5 million). 

 – Successful trials of the TruBrandTM smartphone-based 
authentication technology leading to decisive larger 
scale production tests in 2017.

Although we cannot be assured of the continued sales levels 
of the phosphor materials, we are confident that our proven 
ability to deliver large quantities of material in 2016 to a new 
customer will have lasting value which will translate into 
sustainable increases in our sales of these materials.

Secure Transactions Group 
The Secure Transactions Group, formed around the various 
gaming technology acquisitions made in 2012, performed 
in line with management expectations, generating adjusted 
EBITDA of US$0.5 million (2015: US$0.5 million) on revenue 
of US$1.3 million (2015: US$1.3 million).

The Secure Transactions Group has won three new contracts 
and four new licenses, and has succeeded in introducing a new 
64-bit Premier Integrity package which has been integrated 
with the software systems of the three major lottery providers. 
Norway has adopted this new offering and the state of Virginia 
has adopted our products for two online/mobile products. 
We are confident that we will see growth of the business in 2017.

In addition, we have integrated our TruBrandTM cloud-based 
authentication services into the Secure Transactions Group to 
create an important new growth channel for the Group as the 
smartphone authentication technology gains traction.

AerisTM banknote cleaning technology
While there was no revenue contribution from this business 
line in 2016, development and marketing related expenses 
for the AerisTM product were restricted to approximately 
US$50k. With the completion of a significant number of 
central bank tests as well as internal banknote cleaning 
studies behind us, the program costs associated with this 
new technology will now contract to very basic collateral 
marketing materials and travel to potential customers 
and strategic partners.

The risk averse nature of the banknote industry, with its long 
sales cycle and the many special interests which would be 
negatively affected by the success of AerisTM banknote cleaning 
technology, will impact the adoption cycle of the product. 
The Company is therefore looking to partner with a credible 
industry hardware supplier to advance the adoption of AerisTM.

Strategy
The Company’s strategy for increasing revenue and earnings is 
shifting towards brand authentication markets while continuing 
to expand our banknote business through licensing and the sale 
of already developed technologies.

We have developed and introduced an impressive suite 
of covert authentication products which are currently under 
consideration by central banks and potential corporate 
licensing partners. With multiple developed technologies 
for both paper and polymer substrates already in front of 
potential customers, we no longer need to fund internally 
the development of covert banknote technologies. 

We will focus our efforts going forward on reaping the benefits 
of these developed covert materials products, while also 
supporting and innovating, as required, for our existing central 
bank customers. All additional work on covert materials and 
sensors will be entirely externally funded and a restructuring 
of our staffing requirements is already underway to cut costs 
while bolstering expertise in phosphors and smartphone 
applications software development.

7

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Review of the yearChief Executive Officer’s statement continued

The Company’s shorter-term prospects 
have increased with the growth of the 
authentication business beyond covert 
materials and hardware.

The longer-term (two to four years) opportunities are:

4)  The joint development and licensing of a polymer 

banknote technology by a major printer of banknotes.

5)  The development and supply of further upgraded 
sensor capability to a G7 central bank in response 
to a standardization requirement.

6)  The sale of our smartphone technology TruNoteTM 

for the authentication of banknotes.

We are pleased that we are able to supplement our 
sustained and growing profitability with a number of  
near-term and longer-term prospects of a significant scale. 
We are particularly delighted that the authentication business 
outside of banknotes is increasing ahead of expectations and 
that it can provide a smoothing of our long-term banknote 
business with its characteristically extended sales cycles and 
delays. We believe that we have a number of transformative 
opportunities ahead in several aspects of our business that 
will drive near and long-term earnings growth for the 
Company and its shareholders.

With the Company having reached sustainable profits 
and having sufficient resources to execute on its growth 
plans with its existing cash reserves, the Board is delighted 
to start paying dividends. It intends to pay an inaugural 
annual dividend of US$0.05 per share in June 2017 and 
thereafter to pay the dividend in June after the audited 
close of each fiscal year.

Nabil M. Lawandy
Chief Executive Officer
May 26, 2017

Review of operations continued
Strategy continued
The Company has made a significant and deliberate strategic 
decision to aggressively grow its revenue and earnings through 
the sale of secure materials beyond the covert central bank 
products. This approach focuses on generating high margins 
from our unique security materials, which include phosphors 
and taggants for brand authentication. Taggant sales for brand 
authentication using our TruBrandTM smartphone technology 
will create new revenue streams for both materials as well 
as for the Secure Transactions Group through cloud-based 
server authentication, bringing a fully synergistic benefit 
to the entire business.

Mirroring the shift towards secure materials beyond covert 
technologies is an effort to further reduce and restructure 
our staffing as well as our infrastructure needs. The shift 
in emphasis will accelerate revenue growth, reduce costs, 
and further increase and smooth out our earnings as we 
go forward.

Prospects
The Company’s shorter-term prospects have increased with the 
growth of the authentication business beyond covert materials 
and hardware. In addition, while we are transitioning to a mode 
of capitalizing on our already developed covert technologies 
and customers, we have several significant opportunities 
ahead for this side of the business going forward.

We are targeting six specific opportunities, three of which 
are relatively near term and three of which are somewhat 
longer term.

The important, near-term and significant opportunities are:

1)   The continued sale of our specialty phosphor materials to 
a security thread manufacturer providing product to what 
we believe is a large Asian central bank.

2)  The successful production-scale testing and consummation 
of our TruBrandTM taggants by a large tobacco supplier in Asia, 
leading to sales in late 2018.

3)  Increased revenue for the Secure Transactions Group 

from both online gaming and cloud-based authentication 
services for our TruBrandTM customers.

8

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Corporate governance and financial statements

Corporate governance
10 
12  Directors’ report

 Board of Directors and senior management

Independent auditors’ report

Financial statements
16 
17  Balance sheets
18  Statements of income and other comprehensive income
19  Statements of stockholders’ equity
20  Statements of cash flows
21  Notes to the financial information
33 

 Shareholder and corporate information

Board of Directors and senior management

Board of Directors

BJ Penn  
Non-executive Chairman

Nabil M. Lawandy 
President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Penn was Acting Secretary of the US Navy from March to 
May 2009, having previously been Assistant Secretary of the 
US Navy (Installations and Environment) from March 2005. He was 
also Director, Industrial Base Assessments from October 2001 
to March 2005, with responsibility for the overall health of the 
US defense industrial base. He commenced his career as a 
Naval Aviator, having received his BS from Purdue University, 
West Lafayette, and his MS from the George Washington 
University, Washington, DC. Mr. Penn has been a member 
of the Board since June 2010 and became Chairman of 
the Board on 7 June 2011.

Dr. Lawandy is the founder, President and Chief Executive Officer 
of the Company. From 1981 to 1999, Dr. Lawandy was a tenured 
full professor of Engineering and Physics at Brown University. 
He holds a BA in Physics, and an MSc and PhD in Chemistry, 
both from the Johns Hopkins University. He has authored over 
170 reviewed scientific papers and is an inventor on 52 US and 
27 foreign issued patents. He has also received a Presidential Young 
Investigator Award, an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, a Rolex Award 
for Enterprise and a Samuel Slater Award for Innovation. 

Donald Stanford  
Non-executive Director

Martin Jaskel 
Non-executive Director

Mr. Stanford, who was until 2001 the Chief Technical Officer of 
GTECH Corporation, is an Adjunct Professor of Computer Science 
and Engineering at Brown University and is an instructor in the 
Program in Innovation, Management and Entrepreneurship (PRIME). 
He holds a BA in International Relations and an MS in Computer 
Science and Applied Mathematics, both from Brown University. 
Over 30 years, he has held every technical leadership position, 
including Vice President of Advanced Development and Chief 
Technology Officer. Mr. Stanford serves on several boards including 
Spectra Systems, Times Squared Academy Charter School 
and the Business Innovation Factory. 

Mr. Stanford is a member of the RI Science and Technology 
Advisory Council. He serves on the Brown advisory councils to 
the President and the School of Engineering. In 1999 Mr Stanford 
received the Black Engineer of the Year Award for Professional 
Achievement. In 1999 he also received the Honorable Thurgood 
Marshall Award for Community Service from the NAACP. In 2002 he 
received the Brown Graduate School’s Distinguished Graduate Award 
and the RI Professional Engineer’s Award for Community Service.

Mr Jaskel has over 40 years of involvement in the financial 
services industry. He began in the United Kingdom government 
bond market as a broker with leading firms, latterly as a Partner 
in W Greenwell & Co. In 1986, as an element of the deregulation 
of the UK markets, W Greenwell was sold to Midland Bank and 
became the leading Gilt-Edged Market Maker, of which Mr Jaskel 
was a Director. In 1988 he was appointed Director of Global Sales 
and Marketing of Midland Montagu Treasury (the treasury division 
of Midland Bank) after chairing a committee to redesign the 
distribution of Treasury products. In 1990 he was appointed 
Director of Global Sales at NatWest Treasury and rebuilt the 
neglected franchise global distribution of treasury and 
capital markets products. 

In 1994 he was promoted to Managing Director of Global Trade 
and Banking Services. He sat on the Advisory Board of ECGD, 
the UK export – import bank, was responsible for several years 
for signing off all the UK exposure to BAE and Airbus and sat on 
several government and Bank of England advisory boards. In 1997 
he left NatWest and founded financial services consultancies, 
which included a consultancy at KPMG Corporate Finance and the 
corporate FX division of Travelex plc, and an interim appointment 
as the Managing Director of a private real estate company with 
a £500 million portfolio of commercial and residential property. 
In 2005 he joined European American Capital Limited, an  
FSA-authorized and regulated specialized advisory bank, as 
Senior Advisor. He has wide experience as a Non-executive 
Director of both publicly quoted and private companies.

10

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016 
  
   
     
 
  
   
 
  
   
Senior management

Brian E. McLain 
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary

James Cherry 
Director of Authentication Systems

Mr. McLain has been Spectra’s Chief Financial Officer since 
January 2017. Before joining Spectra, he served as the Corporate 
Controller for OMNIlife Science, Inc. Prior to OMNIlife, he 
progressed from the role of Corporate Controller to Vice President, 
Finance & Business Solutions at SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc., which 
was quoted on NASDAQ prior to being bought out in 2012. 

Previously, he served in various roles at International Power, 
a UK-owned power producer, and Excelergy Corporation, 
a venture-backed software business. He started his career 
at Arthur Andersen. Mr. McLain holds a BS from Boston College 
and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Cherry serves as Director of Authentication Systems. He joined 
the Company in 2002 from Auspex Systems, an enterprise network 
data storage system business, where he had been involved in 
marketing and product management for seven years. Prior to that, 
he had worked for five years at DuPont in product management.

Scott Tillotson 
Director of Secure Transactions

Mr. Tillotson serves as Director of Secure Transactions Group. 
He has held a variety of positions with Spectra for ten years and 
GTECH Corporation, a leader in the lottery industry, for nine years 
in product marketing and management. Prior to that, he worked 
for the IBM Corporation as an Account Executive and Systems 
Engineer. Mr. Tillotson holds a BSEE from Purdue University.

William Goltsos 
Vice President, Engineering

Andrei Smuk 
Director of Research and Development

Dr. Goltsos was appointed Vice President, Engineering in April 2000. 
From September 1996 to April 2000, he served as Senior Systems 
Engineer. Prior to that, from 1992 to 1996, he served as a staff member 
of the MIT/Lincoln Laboratory’s Optical Communications Group. 
Dr. Goltsos holds a BS in Physics from Rensselaer Polytechnic 
Institute and an MS and PhD in Physics from Brown University.

Dr. Smuk, who joined the Company in 2000, was appointed 
Director of Research and Development in 2006. He is responsible 
for the development of advanced materials and innovative sensor 
systems. He received a PhD in Physics from Brown University in 
2000 and an MS in Applied Physics from the Moscow Institute 
of Physics and Technology in 1994.

Key

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Government Security Committee

Nominating Committee

11

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Corporate governance 
   
 
 
 
Directors’ report
for the year ended December 31, 2016

The Directors present their report and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Domicile
Spectra Systems Corporation is a C corporation and is registered and domiciled in the United States of America.

Principal activity
The principal activity of the Company is to invent, develop and sell integrated optical systems that provide customers with 
increased efficiency, security tracking and product life. The integrated systems combine consumables and engineered optical 
materials with software and hardware for use in applications. The Company also provides software tools to the lottery and 
gaming industries for fraud, money laundering and match fixing detection, as well as statistical analysis. 

Results and dividends
The Company’s statements of income and other comprehensive income are set out on page 18 and show the results for 
each year.

There is no federal or state income tax liability on the respective income tax returns due to timing differences arising 
between items of income and expense recorded on the books and those reported on the tax returns. Additionally, the 
Company has approximately US$27 million in federal and US$4 million in state net operating loss carryforwards to offset 
future income reported on the respective tax returns.

The Directors intend to pay a dividend of US$0.05 per share on or about June 30, 2017 to shareholders of record as 
of June 9, 2017.

Review of business and future developments
A review of the operations of the Group is contained in the Spectra at a glance review on page 2.

Principal risks and uncertainties and financial risk management

Complex products
Certain of the products produced by the Company are highly complex and are designed to be used in complex systems. 
Failure to correct errors or other problems identified after deployment could result in events that may have a negative 
effect on the Company’s business and financial condition. 

The Company’s markets may become impacted by technological change
Markets for the Company’s products may become characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards 
and increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. The introduction of products embodying new technology and the 
emergence of new industry standards could render the Company’s existing products obsolete and unmarketable and may 
exert pricing pressure on existing products. If the Company could not then develop products that remain competitive in terms 
of technology and price and that meet customer needs, this could have a negative impact on the business.

Expiry of patents
All patents have a limited duration of enforceability. US patents generally have a duration of 20 years from the filing date. 
Once a patent expires, the invention disclosed in the patent may be freely used by the public without accounting to the 
patent owner, as long as there are no other unexpired patents that embrace an aspect of the invention. There is no certainty 
that any improvement, new use or new formulation will be patented to extend the protection of the underlying invention 
or provide additional coverage to adequately protect the invention. As a result, the public may have the right to freely use 
the invention described in and previously protected by an expired patent.

Dependence on key personnel
The success of the Company’s revenues are dependent on a limited number of employees, in particular the Chief Executive 
Officer and other managers with technological and development input. The Company has endeavored to ensure that its 
key employees are incentivized but cannot guarantee the retention of these staff. The Company also has the benefit of 
keyman insurance.

Forward-looking statements
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this document constitute “forward-looking statements”. 
In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “may”, “intend”, “might”, “will”, “should”, 
“could”, “would”, “believe”, or the negative of these terms and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are 
based on assumptions and estimates, and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, 
financial condition, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results to be materially different from any 
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. New factors may 
emerge from time to time that could cause the Company’s business not to develop as it expects and it is not possible for 
the Company to predict all such factors. Given these uncertainties, investors are cautioned not to place any undue reliance 
on such forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to update any such 
forward-looking statements in this document to reflect future events or developments.

12

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Key performance indicators (in millions)
 – Revenue of US$11.1 million (2015: US$14.1 million).

 – Adjusted EBITDA of US$2.4 million (2015: US$1.1 million).

 – Adjusted EBITDA per share, in cents, of US$0.05 (2015: US$0.02).

 – Basic earnings per share, in cents, of US$0.03 (2015: US$0.00).

Post-reporting date events
On January 18, 2017, the Company extended its lease for manufacturing and warehouse space in East Providence until 
October 31, 2022.

Financial instruments
Details of the use of financial instruments by the Company are contained in note B of the financial statements.

Directors’ responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Directors’ report and the financial statements on the basis of preparation 
set out in note A of the financial statements and in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 
(US GAAP). The Directors of the Company are responsible for the document in which the financial information is included.

In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

 – select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

 – make judgments and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and

 – state whether they have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP, subject to any material departures disclosed 

and explained in the financial statements.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s 
transactions, disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure 
that the financial statements comply with all legal requirements. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the 
Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Directors’ interests
The Directors’ beneficial interests in the common stock of the Company were as follows:

Ordinary shares

N.M. Lawandy

M. Jaskel

December 31,

2016

2015

1,883,570

9,960

1,883,570

9,960

1,893,530

1,893,530

Substantial shareholdings
The following shareholders held 3% or more of the issued common stock of the Company at December 31, 2016:

Worsley Investors Fund

O. Salam

N. Slater

N.M. Lawandy

H. Heye

Ordinary 
shares

6,870,000

3,594,464

3,210,000

1,883,570

1,813,850

17,371,884

% issued

15.18

7.94

7.09

4.16

4.01

38.38

13

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Corporate governanceDirectors’ report continued
for the year ended December 31, 2016

Directors’ compensation
The following table details the Directors’ earned compensation for the year ended December 31, 2016:

Executive Directors

N.M. Lawandy

Non-executive Directors

B. Penn

M. Jaskel

D. Stanford

O. Salam

R. Puton

J. Donohue

Total

Salary 
and bonus 

Benefits

Board fees

Total 
compensation

$ 

475,000 $ 

35,606

$ 

— $ 

510,606

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

12,000

12,000

12,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

$ 

475,000 $ 

35,606

$ 

48,000 $ 

558,606

Directors’ share options
At December 31, 2016, Directors had options or warrants to purchase ordinary shares under the Company’s stock option plan 
as follows:

N.M. Lawandy

B. Penn

M. Jaskel

D. Stanford

Options held at
 December 31,
2016

Weighted 
average 
exercise price

Options vested 
at December 31,
2016

4,105,292

$ 

220,000

220,000

220,000

4,765,292

$ 

0.55

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.55

2,851,250

153,333

153,333

153,333

3,311,249

Corporate governance 
At both December 31, 2016 and the date of this report, the Board comprised one Executive Director, Nabil M. Lawandy, 
and three independent Non-Executive Directors, BJ Penn, as Chairman, Martin Jaskel and Donald Stanford. On April 12, 2016, 
the Board contracted to four members in response to a G7 central bank customer security requirement relating to the 
composition of the Board. At that time, Oussama Salam, Roland Puton and Jeffrey Donohue resigned from the Board. 
The Board usually meets at least every three months to closely monitor the progress of the Company towards the 
achievement of budgets, targets and strategic objectives.

The Board also operates four Committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating 
Committee and the Government Security Committee.

The Audit Committee comprises Martin Jaskel, Nabil M. Lawandy and Donald Stanford. It has primary responsibility for 
monitoring the quality of internal controls and ensuring that the financial performance of the Company is properly measured 
and reported on. It will receive and review reports from the Company’s management and auditors relating to the interim 
and annual accounts and the accounting and internal control systems in use throughout the Company. The Audit Committee 
intends to meet no less than three times each financial year and will have unrestricted access to the Company’s auditors.

The Compensation Committee comprises Martin Jaskel, BJ Penn and Donald Stanford. It reviews the performance of the 
Executive Directors and makes recommendations to the Board on matters relating to remuneration and terms of employment. 
The Committee also makes recommendations to the Board on proposals for the granting of share options and other equity 
incentives pursuant to any share options scheme or equity incentive scheme in operation from time to time. 

The Nominating Committee comprises Martin Jaskel, as Chairman, BJ Penn and Donald Stanford. The Committee seeks 
and nominates qualified candidates for election or appointment to Spectra’s Board of Directors.

14

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016The Government Security Committee comprises BJ Penn, as Chairman, and Nabil M. Lawandy. It is responsible for ensuring 
the implementation within the Company of all procedures, organizational matters and other aspects pertaining to the security 
and safeguarding of information, including the exercise of appropriate oversight and the monitoring of operations to ensure 
that protective measures are effectively maintained and implemented.

The Board intends to comply with Rule 21 of the AIM Rules relating to Directors’ dealings and will also take all reasonable 
steps to ensure compliance by the Company’s applicable employees. The Company has adopted a share dealing code for 
this purpose on substantially the same terms as the Model Code.

Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. 
Financial statements are published on the Company’s website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing 
the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance 
and integrity of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to 
the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.

Auditors
All of the current Directors have made themselves aware of any information needed by the Company’s auditors for the 
purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The Directors are not aware of any 
relevant information of which the auditors are unaware.

Miller Wachman LLP have expressed their willingness to continue as the Company’s auditors and a resolution to re-appoint 
Miller Wachman LLP will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.

By order of the Board

Brian McLain
Company Secretary
June 1, 2017

15

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Corporate governanceIndependent auditors’ report

To the Board of Directors and stockholders of Spectra Systems Corporation
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Spectra Systems Corporation, which comprise the balance 
sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of income and other comprehensive income, 
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management’s responsibility for the financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with 
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, 
and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are 
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit 
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that 
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from 
material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement 
of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal 
control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures 
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the 
entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness 
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well 
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position 
of Spectra Systems Corporation as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows 
for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Miller Wachman LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 1, 2017

16

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Balance sheets
December 31, 2016 and 2015

Assets

Current assets

 Cash and cash equivalents

  Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 
of $12,500 and $12,650 in 2016 and 2015, respectively

 Other receivables

 Inventory

 Prepaid expenses

 Deferred tax assets

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net

Other assets

 Intangible assets, net

 Restricted cash and investments

 Deferred tax assets

 Other assets

Total other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Current liabilities

 Accounts payable

 Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 Deferred revenue

Total current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

 Deferred revenue

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (note J)

Stockholders’ equity

  Common stock, $0.01 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2016 
and 2015; 45,251,370 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015

 Additional paid-in capital – common stock

 Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 Accumulated deficit

Total stockholders’ equity

2016

2015

$ 

8,807,868

$ 

9,808,487

 2,538,230 

 4,198,356 

 167,792 

 52,705 

 2,914,671 

 2,824,195 

 103,981 

 619,000 

 124,975 

 170,000 

 15,151,542 

 17,178,718 

 2,560,970

2,867,526

 7,304,113 

 1,091,732 

 370,000 

 145,727 

 4,627,355 

 1,073,558 

 819,000 

 19,285 

 8,911,572 

 6,539,198 

 $  26,624,084 

 $ 

26,585,442 

 $ 

401,603 

 $ 

1,463,698 

 1,437,346 

 1,260,319 

 1,564,641 

 1,247,273 

 3,099,268 

 4,275,612 

 255,886 

 255,886 

 277,222 

 277,222 

 3,355,154 

 4,552,834 

 452,514 

 452,514 

 55,061,067 

 54,936,776 

 (113,313)

 (86,291)

 (32,131,338)

 (33,270,391)

 23,268,930 

 22,032,608 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

$  26,624,084

$ 

26,585,442

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

17

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statements 
Statements of income and other comprehensive income
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

2016

2015

 $ 

9,036,814 

 $ 

11,672,565 

 1,620,503 

 464,302 

 1,747,474 

 693,824 

 11,121,619 

 14,113,863 

 3,523,360 

 7,402,407 

 7,598,259 

 6,711,456 

2,347,591

3,421,310

737,273

2,549,341

3,525,747

655,395

6,506,174

6,730,483

 1,092,085

 (19,027)

 52,432 

 351 

 (5,815)

 46,968 

 1,139,053 

 — 

 86,648 

 769 

 (33,635)

 53,782 

 34,755 

 — 

 $ 

1,139,053 

 $ 

34,755 

 $ 

 $ 

0.03 

0.03 

 $ 

 $ 

— 

— 

 45,251,370 

 45,251,370 

 45,297,370 

 45,251,370 

 $ 

(32,837)

 $ 

(59,863)

 5,815 

 33,635 

 (27,022)

 (26,228)

$ 

1,112,031  $ 

8,527

Revenues

 Product

 Service

 Royalty

Total revenues

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Operating expenses

 Research and development

 General and administrative

 Sales and marketing

Total operating expenses

Income/(loss) from operations

Other income/(expense)

 Interest income

 Other income, net

 Foreign currency loss

Total other income, net 

Income before provision for income taxes

Provision for income taxes

Net income 

Earnings per share

 Basic

 Diluted

Weighted average number of common shares

 Basic

 Diluted

Other comprehensive (loss)/income

 Unrealized loss on currency exchange

 Reclassification for realized loss in net income

Total other comprehensive loss

Comprehensive income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Statements of stockholders’ equity
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Common stock

Shares

Amount

Additional
paid-in capital

Accumulated 
deficit

Other
comprehensive
loss

Total
stockholders’
equity

Balance at December 31, 2014

45,251,370 $ 

452,514 $  54,913,613 $ (33,305,146) $ 

(60,063) $  22,000,918

Compensation cost related to
amortization of stock options

Reclassification for realized
loss in net income 

Unrealized loss on
currency exchange

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

23,163

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

 23,163 

 33,635 

 33,635 

 (59,863)

 (59,863)

34,755

—

 34,755 

Balance at December 31, 2015

45,251,370 $ 

452,514 $ 54,936,776 $ (33,270,391) $ 

(86,291) $ 22,032,608

Compensation cost related to
amortization of stock options

Reclassification for realized
loss in net income 

Unrealized loss on
currency exchange

Net income 

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

124,291

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

 124,291 

5,815

 5,815 

(32,837)

 (32,837)

1,139,053

—

 1,139,053 

Balance at December 31, 2016

45,251,370 $ 

452,514 $  55,061,067 $  (32,131,338)  $ 

(113,313) $ 23,268,930

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

19

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statementsStatements of cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Cash flows from operating activities

 Net income 

 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:

2016

2015

$ 

1,139,053

$ 

34,755 

  Depreciation and amortization

  Stock-based compensation expense

  Allowance for doubtful accounts

  Inventory obsolescence

  Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

   Accounts receivable

   Other receivable

   Inventory

   Prepaid expenses

   Other assets

   Accounts payable

   Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   Deferred revenue

Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

 Restricted cash and investments

 Payment of patent and trademark costs

 Payment of software costs

 Asset acquisitions

 Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year

 1,097,673 

 124,291 

 22,177 

 — 

 866,673 

 23,163 

 — 

 75,671 

 1,638,365 

 (2,499,512)

 (115,442)

 143,013 

 21,455 

 (2,656)

 (1,126,920)

 (128,068)

 (2,052)

 1,295,314 

 (17,853)

 1,989 

 453,617 

 160,922 

 (8,306)

 (921,685)

 2,804,635 

 (528,998)

 (18,174)

 1,426,442 

 (390,679)

 (123,675)

 (326,192)

 — 

 (3,118,489)

 (213,917)

 (129,646)

 (288,584)

 (3,780,663)

 597,749 

 (24,591)

 (1,000,619)

 (33,110)

 35,641 

 9,808,487 

 9,772,846 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year

$ 

8,807,868  $ 

9,808,487 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

 Income taxes paid

Non-cash investing activities

 Acquisition of patents through accounts payable

 Acquisition of property, plant and equipment through accounts payable

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

$ 

$ 

$ 

—  $ 

500

64,428

$ 

228,536

— $ 

44,000

20

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note A – Corporate information
Spectra Systems Corporation (the “Company”) develops and sells integrated optical systems that provide customers 
with increased efficiency, security tracking and product life. The integrated systems combine consumables and engineered 
optical materials with software and hardware for use in applications. The Company develops and sells its integrated solutions 
across a spectrum of markets, including currency manufacturing and cleaning, branded products, industrial logistics and 
other highly sensitive documents. The Company also provides software tools to the lottery and gaming industries for fraud, 
money laundering and match fixing detection, as well as statistical analysis.

The Company was incorporated on July 3, 1996 in Delaware as Spectra Acquisition Corp. On August 26, 1996, the Company 
purchased substantially all of the assets of SSC Science Corporation (SSCSC) and changed its name to Spectra Science 
Corporation. The assets were purchased for US$1,654,000 in cash plus common stock warrants. The acquisition was 
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.

On June 8, 2001, the Company changed its name to Spectra Systems Corporation.

On July, 25 2011, the Company raised US$20,241,179, net of offering costs, on the London Stock Exchange in a placing 
of 18,592,320 common shares at a placing price of £0.753 per new common share, representing 41.09% of the enlarged 
common share capital of the Company. As a result of the offering, anti-dilution provisions found in the Company’s Amended 
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation converted all of the issued and outstanding preferred shares into 17,185,052 
common shares, giving 26,659,050 common shares in issue at the time of the placing. 

On June 6, 2012, the Company acquired all of the assets of ESI Integrity, Inc., including its proprietary source codes, multi-year 
contracts, long-standing customer relationships and assumed liabilities. US$1,425,000 was paid in consideration for the assets.

On September 14, 2012, the Company acquired certain assets of Lapis Software Associates, including their proprietary 
source codes, multi-year and long-standing customer relationships, and assumed liabilities. US$726,000 was paid in 
consideration for the assets.

On February 28, 2014, the Company acquired certain assets of Inksure Technologies, Inc., including their  
long-standing customer relationships and authentication technology. US$1,356,000 was paid in consideration for the assets. 

On September 30, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Solaris Nanosciences, Inc. (Solaris), including technology 
and customer relationships in exchange for US$213,917 in cash. The Company also recorded US$184,000 in contingent 
payments based on a royalty payment arrangement for anticipated continuing business. 

On January 28, 2016, the Company acquired certain specialty phosphor assets including technology and customer 
relationships. The total consideration amounted to US$3,118,489 (See note M).

Note B – Significant accounting policies

Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States 
of America (US GAAP) requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the 
financial statements and accompanying notes. The accounting estimates that require management’s most difficult and 
subjective judgments include the assessment of recoverability of property, plant, and equipment; the valuation of inventory; 
intangible assets; and the recognition and measurement of income tax assets and liabilities. The actual results may differ 
materially from management’s estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers highly liquid investment purchases with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of acquisition 
to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash and investments
Restricted cash and investments represents a certificate of deposit held as collateral for certain performance requirements 
in accordance with terms of a services contract. At both December 31, 2016 and 2015, the agreement required that US$500,000 
be maintained as collateral. The collateral will be released as the Company meets contractual milestones. Restricted cash 
and investments of US$1,091,732 and US$1,073,558 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are certificates of deposit 
whose maturity exceeded 90 days at the date of acquisition, of which US$500,000 is restricted.

21

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statementsNote B – Significant accounting policies continued
Significant concentrations 
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and 
cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company’s cash management policies restrict investments to low-risk 
highly liquid securities, and the Company restricts its transactions to financial institutions with good credit standing. 
The Company has cash and investments, including restricted, on deposit with financial institutions which are insured by either 
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to US$250,000 per institution or the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation 
up to 100,000 Canadian Dollars per institution. The Company also maintains cash on hand and cash in bank accounts in the 
United Kingdom, neither of which are subject to insurance. As of December 31, 2016, the amount of cash and investments, 
including restricted, not insured was US$9,325,201.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the concentration of business 
with government entities. The Company’s management attempts to minimize credit risk on its accounts receivable by 
monitoring credit exposure on a regular basis.

The following table summarizes the number of customers that individually comprise greater than 10% of total accounts 
receivable and their aggregate percentage of the Company’s total accounts receivable as of:

Number of significant customers

Percentage of total receivables

December 31,

2016

 3 

73%

2015

 2 

80%

The following table summarizes the number of customers that individually comprise greater than 10% of total revenues and 
their aggregate percentage of the Company’s total revenues for the years ended:

Number of significant customers

Percentage of total revenue

The following table summarizes the geographic concentration of revenue for the years ended:

December 31,

2016

 3 

64%

2015

 3 

72%

United States of America

Europe

Rest of World

December 31,

2016

2015

$ 

7,951,227  $ 

10,207,794 

 2,165,437 

 1,004,955 

 2,884,471 

 1,021,598 

$ 

11,121,619  $ 

14,113,863 

Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding customer accounts. 
Management provides for uncollectible accounts through a provision for bad debt expense. At December 31, 2016 
and 2015, the Company had a US$12,500 and a US$12,650 allowance for doubtful accounts, respectively.

22

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015Note B – Significant accounting policies continued
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts 
receivable and accounts payable, are carried in the financial statements at amounts that approximate their fair market 
values at December 31, 2016 and 2015. 

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction 
between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which 
prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon 
the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1  – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2  –  Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices 

for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be 
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3  –  Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market 

participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has certificates of deposit of US$1,091,732 and US$1,073,558, respectively, 
which is included in restricted cash and investments. The Company considers this certificate of deposit as a Level 2 investment.

Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company’s foreign operations is the applicable local currency, the Canadian Dollar. 
The functional currency is translated into US Dollars for balance sheet accounts using currency exchange rates in effect 
as of the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate in effect during 
the applicable period. The translation adjustments are deferred as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in 
accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Inventory
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. The Company 
regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision to write down excess and obsolete inventory to its 
estimated net realizable value if less than cost.

Intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, 
but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate that it might 
be impaired.

Other intangible assets consist of patents, trademarks and various intangible assets identified as part of a business combination 
such as contracts, customer relationships and technology. Patents and trademarks are recorded at cost. For intangible assets 
identified as part of a business combination, values are assigned using various valuation techniques, including the present 
value of expected future cash flows. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful 
lives ranging from seven to 15 years. The Company evaluates the possible impairment of its intangible assets annually or 
whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.

Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated on the basis of purchase price. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method 
over the following estimates useful lives:

Laboratory equipment 

Computer and office equipment 

Furniture and fixtures 

3–7 years

3–5 years

7 years

Leasehold improvements   

Shorter of lease term or estimated useful life

Software 

Manufacturing equipment  

3–5 years

5–7 years

Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets 
and related allowances for depreciation and amortization are eliminated from accounts and any resulting gain or loss is 
reflected in net income.

23

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note B – Significant accounting policies continued
Investment in affiliates
The Company accounts for investments in affiliates under the cost method of accounting if the Company owns less 
than 20% of the affiliates’ outstanding capital. As of December 31, 2016, the Company held a 19% ownership in an affiliate 
(SpectraMed), and a 10% ownership in an affiliate (Solaris). These affiliates have had significant losses in prior years and 
the Company had previously reduced its investments in these affiliates to US$nil.

Accounting for stock-based compensation
In accounting for the Employee Stock Option Plan, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate 
compensation costs associated with options granted to employees. Total compensation costs are recorded over the option 
vesting period, generally three years. 

Revenue recognition
Product revenue includes sales of pigments and security taggants, delivery of prototypes and contracts with multiple 
elements including nonrecurring engineering and follow-on manufacturing. Service revenue includes research and 
development services provided for a fixed price or provided for a specific period.

Revenues related to sales of pigments and security taggants and research and development services provided for a 
specific period are generally recognized when products are shipped or services are provided, the risk of loss has passed 
to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue from multiple element arrangements is deferred until all elements of the contract are delivered unless all of the 
following criteria have been met: (1) the product or service has been delivered; (2) the fee for the delivered element is not 
subject to forfeiture, refund or concession based on performance or delivery of the undelivered element; and (3) the fair 
value of the delivered element is determined based upon the price charged by the Company or the price charged by 
competitors when similar services or products are sold separately, in which case the revenues for each element will be 
recognized independently in accordance with the Company’s policy.

The Company enters into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services and hardware. 
Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under US GAAP, revenue is allocated 
to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is 
recognized as each element is delivered.

Revenue from fixed-price development contracts is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the 
percentage of effort incurred to date to estimated total effort for each contract. That method is used because management 
considers total effort to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts. Because of inherent uncertainties in 
estimating effort, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term.

Royalties are recognized when they are earned based on sales or use of technologies by third parties except where future 
income is not anticipated to cover non-refundable advances received, when the excess royalty is taken to income.

Research and development
Internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Certain third party research and development 
costs are capitalized in connection with contracted work. These costs are expensed as certain milestones are achieved. 
Overhead, general and administrative and training costs are expensed as incurred. 

Income tax
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and 
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income taxes. The benefits from net operating losses 
carried forward may be impaired or limited in certain circumstances. In addition, a valuation allowance can be provided 
for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. 
The Company has a deferred tax asset of US$989,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015. For both 2016 and 2015, there is 
no federal or state income tax liability on those respective income tax returns.

Advertising costs
Advertising costs are charged to expense when incurred. Advertising expense was US$36,725 and US$35,379 for 2016 
and 2015, respectively.

Shipping and handling
The Company reports the cost of shipping and handling as an operating expense. Shipping and handling expense was 
US$138,262 and US$245,019 for 2016 and 2015, respectively.

24

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015Note C – Related party transactions
The Company sold phosphor products and received royalties amounting to approximately US$2,684,000 and US$1,211,000 
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to a company owned by a shareholder.

On September 30, 2015, the Company purchased certain assets, including technology and customer relationships, from Solaris 
in exchange for US$213,917 in cash. The Company also recorded US$184,000 in contingent payments based on a royalty 
payment arrangement for anticipated continuing business. The agreement requires the Company to pay Solaris 10% of any 
revenues hereafter received by the Company from the commercial exploitation of the assets. The Chief Executive Officer 
of Solaris is also the Chief Executive Officer of Spectra.

Note D – Inventories 
Inventories consist of the following:

Raw materials

Finished goods

Note E – Property and equipment 
Property and equipment consists of the following:

Laboratory equipment

Computer and office equipment

Furniture and fixtures

Leasehold improvements

Software

Manufacturing equipment

Total

Less: accumulated depreciation

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

2,079,163 

 $ 

2,111,413 

835,508

712,782

 $ 

2,914,671 

 $ 

2,824,195 

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

655,335 

 $ 

981,343 

 352,157 

 136,850 

 629,544 

 136,850 

 1,470,046 

 1,802,635 

 340,937 

 348,483 

 1,897,755 

 2,604,386 

 4,853,080 

 6,503,241 

 (2,292,110)

 (3,635,715)

 $ 

2,560,970 

 $ 

2,867,526 

Depreciation expense amounted to US$436,573 and US$449,173 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 
As part of its consolidation of East Providence operations (see note J), the Company disposed of US$1,780,968 of fully 
depreciated equipment.

25

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statementsNote F – Intangible assets
Intangible assets consist of the following:

Patents

Customer relationships

Non-compete agreements

Developed technology

Tradename

Trademarks

Goodwill

Total

Less: accumulated amortization

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

2,503,041 

 $ 

2,120,741 

 3,043,000 

 1,943,000 

 188,440 

 1,502,000 

 30,000 

 90,547 

 177,440 

 632,000 

 30,000 

 17,739 

 2,468,863 

 1,564,863 

 9,825,891 

 6,485,783 

 (2,521,778)

 (1,858,428)

 $ 

7,304,113 

 $ 

4,627,355 

Amortization expense amounted to US$661,100 and US$417,500 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 

Estimated amortization expense is as follows:

 $ 

604,358 

 569,659 

 526,587 

 445,836 

 394,065 

 4,763,608 

 $ 

7,304,113 

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

18,897 

 $ 

18,786 

 123,675 

 3,155 

—

 499 

 $ 

145,727 

 $ 

19,285 

Year ending
December 31,

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Note G – Other assets
Other assets consist of the following:

Rental deposits

Deferred contract costs

Other

26

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 
Note H – Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following:

Royalties

Employee compensation

Contingent costs

Professional fees

Property and franchise taxes

Product warranty

Other

Note I – Income taxes
The approximate components of the income tax provision are as follows:

Income tax provision/(benefit) computed at:

Federal statutory rate – current

State statutory rate – current

Federal deferred

State deferred

Change in valuation allowance

Provision for income taxes

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

793,719 

 $ 

808,510 

 272,057 

 184,000 

 93,883 

 30,000 

 25,000 

 38,687 

 303,441 

 184,000 

 82,830 

 90,629 

 25,000 

 70,231 

 $ 

1,437,346 

 $ 

1,564,641 

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

351,000 

 $ 

(54,000)

 62,000 

 90,000 

 16,000 

 (519,000)

 (10,000)

 89,000 

 16,000 

 (41,000)

 $ 

— 

 $ 

— 

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate with our effective income tax rate was as follows:

Statutory federal rate

State income taxes, net of income tax benefit

Non-deductible expenses and other

Change in valuation allowance

Effective tax rate

December 31,

2016

34.0%

0.1%

(28.1%)

(6.0%)

—

2015

34.0%

1.2%

(44.8%)

9.6%

—

27

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statementsNote I – Income taxes continued
Approximate deferred income tax assets are as follows:

Depreciation and amortization

Deferred revenue

Deferred rent

Federal and state tax credits

Inventory

Bad debts

Net operating loss carryforward

Valuation allowance

Total deferred income tax assets

December 31,

2016

2015

 $ 

(153,000)

 $ 

(138,000)

 (492,000)

 (492,000)

 — 

 7,000 

 1,054,000 

 1,054,000 

 97,000 

 5,000 

 189,000 

 5,000 

 8,643,000 

 9,048,000 

 (8,165,000)

 (8,684,000)

 $ 

989,000 

 $ 

989,000 

The Company uses an effective tax rate of 40% consisting of a federal rate of 34% and a state rate of 6% net of federal effect.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards expiring between 2018 and 2036 for US federal 
income tax purposes of approximately US$27,000,000 and US$4,000,000 expiring between 2017 and 2020 for state income 
tax purposes. A valuation allowance has been established for US$8,165,000 and US$8,684,000 as of December 31, 2016 
and 2015, respectively, for the deferred tax benefit related to those loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. 

At December 31, 2016, the Company also had approximately US$1,100,000 of tax credit carryforwards that are available 
to offset federal and state liabilities. The credits will begin to expire between 2018 and 2028 for federal and between 2018 
and 2023 for state.

The utilization of the tax carryforwards described above are dependent upon future profitability prior to any expiration 
dates. Additionally, alternative minimum taxes, if any, and substantial changes in ownership and tax laws and regulations 
may substantially limit their realization.

The Company accounts for the effect of any uncertain tax positions based on a “more likely than not” threshold to the 
recognition of the tax positions being sustained based on the technical merits of the position under scrutiny by the applicable 
taxing authority. If a tax position or positions are deemed to result in uncertainties of those positions, the unrecognized tax 
benefit is estimated based on a “cumulative probability assessment” that aggregates the estimated tax liability for all uncertain 
tax positions. The Company is not currently under examination by any taxing jurisdiction. The Company’s federal and state 
income tax returns are generally open for examination for three years following the date filed.

Note J – Commitments and contingencies
The Company is involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company is not 
currently a party to any lawsuit or proceeding.

Lease commitments
The Company holds four real estate leases. The Company’s lease agreement for corporate office space expired 
September 30, 2012 and is now in a month-to-month arrangement. The Company signed a five-year lease agreement 
for manufacturing and warehouse space in East Providence beginning in November 2013 and expiring in October 2017. 
During January 2017, this lease was extended through October 2022 (see note P). To support the ICS business, the Company 
signed a lease which has been extended through January 2019. The Company’s lease for laboratory space in East Providence 
has been extended through May 31, 2020 for a portion of the space. The Company will vacate the remaining portion of the 
space by June 1, 2017 and consolidate its operations at its other East Providence locations. Rent expense was US$434,591 
and US$419,990 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

28

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015Note J – Commitments and contingencies continued
Lease commitments continued
Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Year ending
December 31,

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

 $ 

308,105 

 253,921 

 234,165 

 166,940 

 120,817 

 102,770 

 $ 

1,186,718 

License and supply agreements
In 1996, and subsequently amended in 1999 and 2002, the Company entered into a license agreement under which the Company 
obtained a nonexclusive right to use certain technology through the term of the licensor’s patents on such technology. 
The license agreement contains provisions for royalties to be paid on sales of products developed under the agreement. 
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded US$185,191 and US$224,904, respectively, in 
royalty expense.

Note K – Stockholders’ equity

Common and preferred stock
On July 25, 2011, the Company raised US$20,241,179, net of offering costs, on the London Stock Exchange in a placing 
of 18,592,320 common shares at a placing price of £0.753 per new common share, representing 41.09% of the enlarged 
common share capital of the Company. As a result of the offering, anti-dilution provisions found in the Company’s 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation converted all of the issued and outstanding preferred shares into 
17,185,052 common shares, giving 26,659,050 common shares in issue at the time of the placing. At December 31, 2016 
there were 45,251,370 common shares issued and outstanding and no preferred shares in issue. 

Stock option plans
In February 2002, the Company adopted the 2002 Stock Plan (the “2002 Plan”) which provided for the grant of incentive 
stock options and nonqualified stock options, stock awards and stock purchase rights for the purchase of up to 1,500,000 
shares of the Company’s common stock to officers, employees, consultants and Directors of the Company. The Board 
of Directors is responsible for administration of the 2002 Plan. The Board determines the term of each option, the option 
exercise price, and the number of shares for which each option is granted and the rate at which each option is exercisable. 
Incentive stock options may be granted to an officer or employee at an exercise price per share of not less than the fair 
value per common share on the date of the grant (not less than 110% of fair value in the case of holders of more than 10% 
of the Company’s voting stock) and with a term not to exceed ten years from the date of the grant (five years for incentive 
stock options granted to holders of more than 10% of the Company’s voting stock). Nonqualified stock options may be 
granted to consultants or Directors at an exercise price per share of not less than 85% of the fair value of the common 
stock. Stock options generally vest over three years and are exercisable over a period up to ten years from the date 
of grant. As of December 31, 2016, 135,000 options were outstanding under the 2002 Plan.

In May 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Stock Plan (the”2007 Plan”) which provided for the grant of incentive stock 
options and nonqualified stock options, stock awards and stock purchase rights for the purchase of up to 14,100,000 shares 
of the Company’s common stock to officers, employees, consultants and Directors of the Company. The Board of Directors 
is responsible for administration of the 2007 Plan. The Board determines the term of each option, the option exercise price, 
and the number of shares for which each option is granted and the rate at which each option is exercisable. Stock options 
generally vest over three years and are exercisable over a period up to ten years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2016, 
6,912,414 options were outstanding and 7,052,586 options were available for grant under the 2007 Plan.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the remaining 344,451 options that were issued without a plan expired.

29

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statements 
Note K – Stockholders’ equity continued
Stock option plans continued
Information related to stock options granted by the Company is summarized as follows (including certain options granted 
outside of the Plans):

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Number of shares
under option

Weighted average
exercise price

Number of shares
under option

Weighted average
exercise price

Outstanding at beginning of year

6,012,391

$ 

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited/canceled

3,306,689

—

(2,271,666)

Outstanding at end of year

7,047,414

$ 

0.74

0.37

—

0.91

0.51

6,141,491

$ 

0.74

—

—

(129,100)

6,012,391

$ 

—

—

0.73

0.74

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016:

Exercise price range

US$0.30–US$0.84

US$0.85–US$1.23

Options outstanding

Options exercisable

Weighted
average
contractual life
(years)

Weighted
average
exercise price

Number of
shares

Weighted
average
exercise price

6.22

$ 

3.97

6.07

$ 

0.47

1.19

0.51

4,376,284

$ 

460,000  

4,836,284

$ 

0.52

1.19

0.58

Number of
outstanding
shares

6,587,414

460,000

7,047,414

As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average contractual life for exercisable stock options was 4.55 years.

The Company’s stock price closed at US$0.31 (£0.255) on December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate 
intrinsic value for outstanding and exercisable stock options was US$72,659 and US$24,309, respectively. Intrinsic value for 
stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value of the stock and the exercise price. The intrinsic 
value represents the value that would have been received by the option holders had the option holders exercised all of their 
options as of that date.

The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of its stock options. 
The valuations determined using this model are affected by assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective 
variables including stock price, volatility, expected life of options, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividends, if any. 
The Company recorded stock-based compensation costs of US$124,291 and US$23,163 for the years ended December 31, 2016 
and 2015, respectively. There was no stock-based compensation expense capitalized during either year. During the year 
ended December 31, 2016, the weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted was US$0.37. The assumptions 
used to value stock option grants are as follows for the year ended:

Risk-free rate

Expected life (years)

Assumed volatility

Expected dividends

December 31, 
2016

0.7%

 5.00 

32.7%

None

As of December 31, 2016, there was approximately US$242,491 of unrecognized compensation cost, related to unvested 
stock-based payments granted to our employees, Directors and consultants, which is expected to be recognized over 
a weighted average period of two years. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in 
estimated forfeitures and recognized over the remaining vesting periods of the stock grants.

30

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 
 
 
 
Note L – Employee retirement plan
During 1999, the Company adopted a defined contribution plan, established under the guidelines of Section 401(k) of the 
Internal Revenue Code (IRC), which covers all employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the employee retirement 
plan (Plan) at the beginning of the first month following the date of hire. Employees may contribute up to the maximum 
allowed by the IRC of eligible pay on a pretax basis. The Company made a matching contribution of 50% of employee 
contributions up to 4% of eligible salary. Company matching contributions vest at 25% after one year of service, 50% at 
the end of two years of service and 100% at the end of three years of service. For the years ended December 31, 2016 
and 2015, the Company’s matching contributions were US$39,482 and US$41,419, respectively.

Note M – Business combinations
On January 29, 2016, the Company acquired certain specialty phosphor assets primarily used in the authentication of world 
banknotes for total consideration of US$3,118,489. In addition to the assets, most importantly, the Company has acquired 
long-standing customer relationships related to the assets including a major world supplier of banknote inks. The Company 
will incorporate the acquired assets within its existing phosphor business and reports this acquisition as part of its 
Authentication Systems segment.

The following tables provide further details of this acquisition:

Assets acquired

Inventories

Goodwill

Customer relationships (15-year amortization period)

Developed technology (10-year amortization period)

Non-compete agreement (3-year amortization period)

 233,489 

 964,000 

 1,050,000 

 860,000 

 11,000 

 3,118,489 

Note N – Segment reporting
In accordance with ASC 280, management has identified three operating segments. The first is the Authentication Systems 
Group, which captures the hardware, software and materials related to the authentication of banknotes, tax stamps and other 
high value goods. The second segment is the Secure Software Transactions Group, which provides an Internal Control 
System (ICS) software offering to the lottery and gaming industries. ICS provides tools for fraud, money laundering and 
match fixing detection, as well as statistical analysis. The third segment is the Banknote Cleaning Group, which captures 
the technology related to cleaning soiled banknotes.

Information for each reportable segment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Gross
revenue

Income/(loss)
from operations

Depreciation and
amortization

Capital
expense

Segment
assets

2015

Secure Software Transactions

$ 

1,321,822 $ 

162,058 $ 

202,957 $ 

18,517 $ 

3,147,070

Authentication Systems

12,792,041

357,509

Banknote Cleaning

—

(538,594)

626,843

36,873

22,690

22,633,632

247,377

804,740

Total

$ 

14,113,863 $ 

(19,027) $ 

866,673 $ 

288,584 $  26,585,442

2016

Secure Software Transactions

$ 

1,274,211 $ 

350,686 $ 

205,433 $ 

16,206 $ 

2,563,557

Authentication Systems

9,847,408

791,399

849,539

Banknote Cleaning

—

(50,000)

42,701

40,000

73,440

23,165,251

895,276

Total

$ 

11,121,619 $ 

1,092,085 $ 

1,097,673 $ 

129,646 $  26,624,084

31

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statements 
Note O – Earnings per share
The calculation of basic earnings per share is based on the net income divided by the weighted average number of common 
shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by considering the dilutive impact of common stock equivalents 
under the treasury stock method as if they were converted into common stock as of the beginning of the period or as of 
the date of grant, if later. For 2015, the exercise price of all options exceeded the average market price of the shares in issue 
and therefore are not considered in the diluted earnings per share calculation. The following table shows the calculation 
of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

Numerator

 Net income

Denominator

December 31, 
2016

December 31, 
2015

 $ 

1,139,053 

 $ 

34,755 

 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 45,251,370 

 45,251,370 

Effect of dilutive securities

 Stock options

 46,000 

— 

Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 45,297,370 

 45,251,370 

Earnings per common share

 Basic

 Diluted

 $ 

 $ 

0.03

0.03

 $ 

 $ 

—

—

Note P – Subsequent events
The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through June 1, 2017, the date these financial statements 
were available to be issued.

On January 18, 2017, the Company extended its lease for manufacturing and warehouse space in East Providence until 
October 31, 2022. The minimum lease commitment is included in the lease commitment table within note J.

On March 30, 2017, the Company declared a dividend of US$0.05 per share to be paid on or around June 30, 2017 to 
shareholders of record as of June 9, 2017.

32

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Notes to the financial information continuedfor the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015Shareholder and corporate information

Registered office

Spectra Systems Corporation
321 South Main Street, Suite 102 
Providence, RI 02903 
United States of America

+1 401 274 4700

Nominated Advisor

WH Ireland Limited
24 Martin Lane 
London EC4R 0DR 
United Kingdom

+44 (0) 207 220 1666

Broker

WH Ireland Limited
24 Martin Lane 
London EC4R 0DR 
United Kingdom

+44 (0) 207 220 1666

Auditors and Reporting Accountants

Miller Wachman LLP
100 Cambridge Street, 13th Floor 
Boston, MA 02114 
United States of America

+1 617 338 6800

English Law Legal Counsel

Covington & Burling LLP
265 Strand 
London WC2R 1BH 
United Kingdom

+44 (0) 207 067 2000

US Based Legal Counsel

Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, PC
One Citizens Plaza, 8th Floor 
Providence, RI 02903 
United States of America

+1 401 274 7200

Registrar

Computershare Investor Services PLC
2nd Floor 
Vintners’ Place 
68 Upper Thames Street 
London EC4V 3BJ

+44 (0) 870 703 0300

33

Spectra Systems Corporation Annual report and accounts 2016Financial statementsS

p

e

c

t

r

a

S

y

s

t

e

m

s

C

o

r

p

o

r

a

t

i

o

n

A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

1

6

Spectra Systems Corporation
321 South Main Street 
Providence, RI 02903 USA 
tel: 401.274.4700 fax: 401.274.3127 
email: info@spsy.com