Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Auto - Manufacturers / Subaru Corporation

Subaru Corporation

fujhy · OTC Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker fujhy
Exchange OTC
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Auto - Manufacturers
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Subaru Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.

Ebisu Subaru Bldg., 1-20-8, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8554

Phone: +81-3-6447-8000

Fax: +81-3-6447-8184

http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/ir/

Annual Report

2015

For the year ended March 31, 2015

Introduction

THE SUBARU “SAFETY” JOURNEY

Having roots in the aircraft industry, FHI considers safety to be the most important feature 
underpinning automobiles. Since we launched the Subaru 360 over a half-century ago, 
we have engaged in automotive manufacturing to this day with a philosophy of 
“All-Around Safety” and maximum emphasis on safety performance.

SINCE 1917
Ensuring safety for pilots
Our DNA of safety is inherited from 
aircraft development.
At the core of Subaru’s safety development exper-
tise lies traits acquired from developing aircrafts. 
Given  the  lethal  ramifications  of  a  crash,  aircraft 
development  requires  designs  that  consider  all 
manner of possible emergency situations, hence 
the implementation of ideas and countermeasures 
within  the  aircraft’s  basic  structure  to  prevent 
the  onset  of  danger.  In  addition,  one  of  the 
indispensable safety features of smaller aircraft is 
the ability for the pilot to be able to secure an 
all-around unobstructed line of sight. This approach 
to safety has not diminished after we moved into 
automobile manufacturing. Since we released 
the Subaru 360, all of our vehicles have been 
developed  with  an  emphasis  on  safety  features, 
starting with unobstructed visibility.

Developing a vehicle body for collision safety 
based on All-Around Safety that is ahead of the times.
The  Subaru  360,  launched  in  1958,  fulfilled  a  key  role  in  helping  the 
spread of  automobiles during Japan’s high growth period. Since that 
period,  Subaru  has  dedicated  itself  to  developing  vehicle  bodies  for 
collision safety following our principle of All-Around Safety—effectively 
absorbing shock from collisions in all directions and protecting passen-
gers with a cabin structure of robust strength. Early on, safety was not 
yet emphasized as part of the value of vehicles and there were no crash 
test dummies in existence. Subaru’s development team, however, 
pushed forward independent research on car body structure and how it 
affects human passengers. Through trial and error, we pursued superior 
collision safety technologies ahead of their time.

SI N C E  19 6 0
SI N C E  19 6 0
Ensuring safety for drivers

Horizontally-opposed SUBARU BOXER engine

SINCE 1970
SINCE 1970
Ensuring safe driving, turning, and braking

Developing proprietary technologies for enhanced driving safety, 
such as the horizontally-opposed engine and AWD.

Fundamental automobile performance in terms of driving, turning, and braking differs 
depending on the vehicle's structure. In particular, the location of the center of gravity 
and the type of drive train have a significant effect. The lower the center of gravity, 
the more stable the cornering, while a drive train that delivers power to all of the 
wheels gives constant stability when driving. This is the perspective that led Subaru, 
in  1966,  to  launch  the  Subaru  1000—a  FWD  vehicle  with  a  horizontally-opposed 
engine—and,  in  1972,  the  4WD  Subaru  Leone.  Since  that  time,  we  have 
further honed our proprietary technologies and continued to pursue safe and 
stable driving performance.

Subaru 360

Leone 4WD

Subaru 1000

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

01

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Introduction

THE SUBARU “SAFETY” JOURNEY

Having roots in the aircraft industry, FHI considers safety to be the most important feature 

underpinning automobiles. Since we launched the Subaru 360 over a half-century ago, 

we have engaged in automotive manufacturing to this day with a philosophy of 

“All-Around Safety” and maximum emphasis on safety performance.

Ensuring safety for pilots

Our DNA of safety is inherited from 

aircraft development.

At the core of Subaru’s safety development exper-

tise lies traits acquired from developing aircrafts. 

Given  the  lethal  ramifications  of  a  crash,  aircraft 

development  requires  designs  that  consider  all 

manner of possible emergency situations, hence 

the implementation of ideas and countermeasures 

within  the  aircraft’s  basic  structure  to  prevent 

the  onset  of  danger.  In  addition,  one  of  the 

indispensable safety features of smaller aircraft is 

the ability for the pilot to be able to secure an 

all-around unobstructed line of sight. This approach 

to safety has not diminished after we moved into 

automobile manufacturing. Since we released 

the Subaru 360, all of our vehicles have been 

developed  with  an  emphasis  on  safety  features, 

starting with unobstructed visibility.

Developing a vehicle body for collision safety 

based on All-Around Safety that is ahead of the times.

The  Subaru  360,  launched  in  1958,  fulfilled  a  key  role  in  helping  the 

spread of  automobiles during Japan’s high growth period. Since that 

period,  Subaru  has  dedicated  itself  to  developing  vehicle  bodies  for 

collision safety following our principle of All-Around Safety—effectively 

absorbing shock from collisions in all directions and protecting passen-

gers with a cabin structure of robust strength. Early on, safety was not 

yet emphasized as part of the value of vehicles and there were no crash 

test dummies in existence. Subaru’s development team, however, 

pushed forward independent research on car body structure and how it 

affects human passengers. Through trial and error, we pursued superior 

collision safety technologies ahead of their time.

Ensuring safety for drivers

Horizontally-opposed SUBARU BOXER engine

Launching our flagship Legacy.
Embarking on development of driving support systems.
Our flagship Legacy model, launched in 1989, demonstrated both reliable 
driving  performance  and  mechanical  endurance  when  it  set  a  world 
speed record in January of that same year for 100,000 km of continu-
ous driving. Furthermore, around this period, we started development of 
a driving support system using stereo cameras. In 1999, we commer-
cialized ADA, Active Driving Assist, which was the predecessor of our 
current EyeSight technology. 

IN THE 1980s & 1990s
Ensuring safety for drivers and 
passengers

Ensuring safe driving, turning, and braking

Developing proprietary technologies for enhanced driving safety, 

such as the horizontally-opposed engine and AWD.

Fundamental automobile performance in terms of driving, turning, and braking differs 

depending on the vehicle's structure. In particular, the location of the center of gravity 

and the type of drive train have a significant effect. The lower the center of gravity, 

the more stable the cornering, while a drive train that delivers power to all of the 

wheels gives constant stability when driving. This is the perspective that led Subaru, 

in  1966,  to  launch  the  Subaru  1000—a  FWD  vehicle  with  a  horizontally-opposed 

engine—and,  in  1972,  the  4WD  Subaru  Leone.  Since  that  time,  we  have 

further honed our proprietary technologies and continued to pursue safe and 

stable driving performance.

Commercializing EyeSight—Levorg with the latest 
EyeSight (ver. 3) technology earns the highest ratings 
in preventative safety tests.

In 2008, we commercialized our EyeSight technology with stereo cameras 
constantly surveying the area forward of the vehicle, and warnings and 
pre-crash braking functions for preventing accidents or mitigating damage 
from accidents. Furthermore, in 2014, we achieved a new level of high 
performance and function with the launch of EyeSight Ver. 3. The Levorg 
with this latest EyeSight technology has garnered the highest ratings in a 
host of preventative safety performance tests.

I N  TH E  2 0 0 0 s  & 20 1 0 s
Ensuring safety for everyone

INT O T HE F UT URE
Working toward achieving 
a safer society
The future of safety according to Subaru.

Going  forward,  Subaru  is  working  on  development 
themes, including heavy traffic autopilot and automat-
ed freeway driving, as we further evolve the EyeSight 
technology. Under our philosophy of All-Around Safety, 
we will continue to pursue safety from many diverse 
perspectives and contribute to realizing a society with 
automobiles that anyone can drive with peace of mind.

Subaru 360

Leone 4WD

Subaru 1000

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

02

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Contents

01

04

05

06

07

14

17

27

29

31

THE SUBARU “SAFETY” JOURNEY

At a Glance

Business Highlights

Consolidated Financial and 
Non-Financial Highlights

A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message from CFO

Special Feature:  
PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

18  Introduction

19  Project General Manager (PGM)  

Interview

23  Leveraging Production to Stand  
  Above the Crowd

25  Leveraging Marketing to Stand  
  Above the Crowd

Corporate Governance

Board Directors / Executive Officers

Financial Information

31  Consolidated Ten-Year Financial  
  Summary

32  Five-Year Automobile Sales

34  Management’s Discussion and  
  Analysis of Results of Operations  

and Financial Position

42

Corporate Data / Stock Information

Disclaimer Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements  herein  concerning  plans  and  strategies, 
expectations or projections about the future, FHI’s efforts 
with  regard  to  various  management  issues,  and  other 
statements, except for historical facts, are forward-looking 
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject 
to  uncertainties  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ 
materially from those anticipated. These uncertainties include, 
but are not limited to, general economic conditions, demand 
for and prices of FHI’s products, FHI’s ability to continue to 
develop and market advanced products, raw material prices, 
and currency exchange rates. FHI disclaims any obligation 
to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a 
result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Confidence in Motion

Confidence in Motion is a unified global brand statement that encapsulates the aim of the Subaru brand. 
Confidence reflects our approach towards reliable automobile manufacturing dating back to the Subaru 360 
and the relationship of trust that we have built with customers by providing enjoyment and peace of mind. 
In Motion expresses Subaru’s resolve to enhance customer trust by proactively staying abreast of changing trends. 
Through Confidence in Motion, Subaru aims to meet customer expectations for the freedom and 
fulfillment enabled by Subaru’s uniquely satisfying driving experience.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

03

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
Confidence in Motion

Confidence in Motion is a unified global brand statement that encapsulates the aim of the Subaru brand. 

Confidence reflects our approach towards reliable automobile manufacturing dating back to the Subaru 360 

and the relationship of trust that we have built with customers by providing enjoyment and peace of mind. 

In Motion expresses Subaru’s resolve to enhance customer trust by proactively staying abreast of changing trends. 

Through Confidence in Motion, Subaru aims to meet customer expectations for the freedom and 

fulfillment enabled by Subaru’s uniquely satisfying driving experience.

01

04

05

06

07

14

17

27

29

31

THE SUBARU “SAFETY” JOURNEY

At a Glance

Business Highlights

Consolidated Financial and 

Non-Financial Highlights

A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message from CFO

Special Feature:  

PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

18  Introduction

19  Project General Manager (PGM)  

Interview

23  Leveraging Production to Stand  

  Above the Crowd

25  Leveraging Marketing to Stand  

  Above the Crowd

Corporate Governance

Board Directors / Executive Officers

Financial Information

31  Consolidated Ten-Year Financial  

  Summary

32  Five-Year Automobile Sales

34  Management’s Discussion and  

  Analysis of Results of Operations  

and Financial Position

42

Corporate Data / Stock Information

Disclaimer Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements  herein  concerning  plans  and  strategies, 

expectations or projections about the future, FHI’s efforts 

with  regard  to  various  management  issues,  and  other 

statements, except for historical facts, are forward-looking 

statements. These forward-looking statements are subject 

to  uncertainties  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ 

materially from those anticipated. These uncertainties include, 

but are not limited to, general economic conditions, demand 

for and prices of FHI’s products, FHI’s ability to continue to 

develop and market advanced products, raw material prices, 

and currency exchange rates. FHI disclaims any obligation 

to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a 

result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Contents

At a Glance
Years ended March 31

SUBARU Automotive 
Business

Aerospace Company

Industrial Products 
Company

Percentage 
by business

FYE March 2015
Net Sales

2,877.9

billion yen

SUBARU Automotive Business

93.8%
5.0%

Aerospace Company

Industrial Products Company

1.0%
0.2%

Other

Net sales for this division stood at ¥2,699.0 
billion,  an  increase  of  ¥452.4  billion,  or 
20.1%, year on year. Segment income also 
increased ¥91.9 billion, or 29.7%, year on 
year to ¥400.9 billion.

The  number  of  units  sold  worldwide 
increased  by  86  thousand  units,  or  10.4%, 
year on year to 911 thousand units, owing to 
the  strength  in  the  North  American  market. 
Vehicle unit sales posted a record for the third 
consecutive year both globally and outside 
Japan,  and  for  the  sixth  consecutive  year in 
the North American market.

Net sales in this division increased ¥18.4 billion, 
or  14.8%,  compared  to  the  previous  fiscal 
year,  to  ¥142.8  billion.  Segment  income  also 
rose  ¥4.8  billion,  or  33.7%,  year  on  year  to 
¥18.9 billion. Sales of the C-2 transport aircraft 
to  the  Ministry  of  Defense  exceeded  that  of 
the  previous  fiscal  year,  while  sales  to  the 
commercial sector increased over the previous 
fiscal year thanks to net sales-boosting factors 
such  as  the  exchange  rate  and  a  surge  in 
production of the Boeing 787, among others.

Net  sales  in  the  Industrial  Products  division 
were  down  ¥0.7  billion,  or  2.5%,  from  the 
previous fiscal year, to ¥29.0 billion. Segment 
income increased ¥0.1 billion, or 23.3%, year 
on year to ¥0.8 billion.
  Sales were higher for leisure-related engines 
in  North  America,  and  sales  were  markedly 
higher  for  pressure  washer  engines  for North 
American  big  box  hardware  stores.  Sales  for 
general  purpose  engines  for  Japan  and  other 
products, however, were lower.

Net Sales
(Billions of yen)

2,246.6

2,699.0

Operating Income
(Billions of yen)

400.9

309.0

Net Sales
(Billions of yen)

124.4

142.8

Operating Income
(Billions of yen)

18.9

Net Sales (Billions of yen)

29.8

29.0

Operating Income
(Billions of yen)
0.8

14.1

0.6

+

20.1%

+

29.7%

2014

2015

2014

2015

+

14.8%

2014

2015

+

33.7%

2014

2015

Points
•  Sales were strong outside Japan for Legacy/Outback, 
  and WRX, and following on from last year, for 
  Forester as well.

•  Increase in costs, such as R&D expenses, was offset 
  by increase in units sold, improvement in exchange 
  rates, and progress in reducing prime costs.

Point
• Products for the commercial sector saw increased 
  sales as the exchange rate improved, and production 
  units of the Being 787 increased.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

04

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

–

2.5%

2014

2015

+

23.3%

2014

2015

Point
• Sales grew for leisure-related engines and general 
  purpose engines in North America.

 
 
 
 
Business Highlights

Subaru Levorg Wins 
“Good Design Award 2014”
The  Subaru  Levorg  has  won  the  “Good  Design 
Award  2014”  from  the  Japan  Institute  of  Design 
Promotion (JDP). Following the 2013 award for the 
Forester and 2012 award for the Impreza and Subaru 
XV, this marks the 3rd consecutive year that Subaru 
has  been  honored  with  the  Good  Design  Award, 
which  reflects  JDP’s  high  praise  for  the  Subaru 
design that fuses together style and functionality.

Subaru Posts Record Sales in the U.S., 
Canada, and Australia in 2014
Subaru’s 2014 calendar year retail sales have posted 
all-time  records  in  its  key  markets  of  the  U.S., 
Canada, and Australia. Subaru’s U.S. sales in partic-
ular  have  exceeded  a  500,000  unit  milestone  for 
the first time in its history, while also achieving six 
consecutive years of record sales and becoming the 
only manufacturer in the U.S. to post seven consec-
utive years of sales growth.

Subaru Debuts “EyeSight” 
Driving Support System in Europe
The all-new Outback launched in Europe during 2014 
was the first Subaru model built to European specifi-
cations that featured our proprietary EyeSight driving 
support system. EyeSight’s launch on the European 
market, following on from its introduction to the Jap-
anese, Australian, and North American markets, en-
ables FHI to extend EyeSight’s deployment across 
markets globally.

The New Subaru WRX’s Horizontally-
Opposed “DIT” Engine Named to 
2015 Ward’s “10 Best Engines”
The  U.S.  automotive  industry  trade  journal  Ward’s 
has named Subaru’s “FA20” 2.0-liter 4-cylinder hori-
zontally-opposed direct injection turbo “DIT” engine 
in the U.S.-specification 2015 Subaru WRX a winner 
of its 2015 Ward’s “10 Best Engines” award. This is 
the fourth time, coming after a two-year hiatus, that 
Subaru has won a prestigious Ward's “10 Best En-
gines” accolade.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

05

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Cumulative Production of Horizontally-
Opposed SUBARU BOXER Engine Reaches 
15 Million Units
The  cumulative  total  of  horizontally-opposed 
SUBARU BOXER engines produced has reached 15 
million units. The achievement has come in the 49th 
year  since  our  water-cooled  4-cylinder  horizontal-
ly-opposed aluminum engine was developed in 1966 
and installed for the first time in the compact passen-
ger car Subaru 1000 in May of the same year.

Plant Constructed for Assembly of 
Center Wing Boxes for Boeing’s 777X
FHI  has  begun  construction  of  its  third  assembly 
facility for aircraft parts on the premises of its Handa 
Plant located in Handa City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. 
At  the  new  facility,  FHI  plans  to  assemble  center 
wing boxes for the U.S.’s Boeing Co.’s next-genera-
tion passenger jet, the Boeing 777X. The new facili-
ty is scheduled to be completed in 2016.

FHI Subaru Visitor Center Sees 
One Million Visitors
Visitors to the Subaru Visitor Center, located within the 
Yajima Plant of the Gunma Manufacturing Division, 
reached a cumulative total of 1 million people on 
September 8, 2014. The Center was opened on July 
15,  2003  to  commemorate  FHI's  50th  anniversary 
and hosts factory tours, mainly for elementary school 
students visiting as part of their social studies classes. 
During tours, visitors are given the opportunity to view 
automobile manufacturing processes.

5 Subaru Models Awarded 2015 TOP 
SAFETY PICK+ (TSP+) by IIHS in the U.S.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) in the 
U.S. has awarded the best possible ranking of TSP+ in 
2015 safety assessments of EyeSight-equipped 2015 
models  of  Legacy,  Outback,  Forester,  Impreza,  and 
Subaru XV currently sold in the North American region.

Business Highlights

Consolidated Financial and Non-Financial Highlights
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES 
Years ended March 31

2011

2012

2013

2014

  (Billions of yen)
2015

Net Sales
3,000

(Billions of yen)

For the Year:

Net sales

Operating income

Net income (loss)

Capital expenditures

Depreciation expenses

R&D expenses

Automobiles sales volume (thousand units)

Exchange rate (¥/$, non-consolidated)

At Year-End:

Total assets

Net assets

Interest-bearing debt

Number of employees

Financial Ratios:

ROE (%)

ROA1 (%)

¥

1,580.6

¥

1,517.1

¥

1,913.0

¥

2,408.1

¥ 2,877.9

84.1

50.3

43.1

49.8

42.9

657

86

1,188.3

414.0

330.6

27,296

12.7

7.0

44.0

38.5

54.3

53.7

48.1

640

79

1,352.5

451.6

341.0

27,123

8.9

3.5

120.4

119.6

70.2

55.9

49.1

724

82

1,577.5

596.8

307.2

27,509

22.9

8.2

326.5

206.6

68.5

54.9

60.1

825

100

1,888.4

770.1

269.7

28,545

30.4

18.8

423.0

261.9

110.7

64.8

83.5

911

108

2,199.7

1,030.7

211.2

29,774

29.3

20.7

1. ROA was calculated as “operating income / (average of assets at the beginning and end of the term)”

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

06

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

2,877.9

2,408.1

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

1,913.0

1,580.6 1,517.1

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Operating Income & Net Income (Loss)

(Billions of yen)

Operating Income

Net Income (Loss)

500

400

300

200

423.0

326.5

261.9

206.6

120.4

119.6

100

84.1

50.3

44.0 38.5

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Subaru Levorg Wins 

“Good Design Award 2014”

The  Subaru  Levorg  has  won  the  “Good  Design 

Award  2014”  from  the  Japan  Institute  of  Design 

Promotion (JDP). Following the 2013 award for the 

Forester and 2012 award for the Impreza and Subaru 

XV, this marks the 3rd consecutive year that Subaru 

has  been  honored  with  the  Good  Design  Award, 

which  reflects  JDP’s  high  praise  for  the  Subaru 

design that fuses together style and functionality.

Subaru Posts Record Sales in the U.S., 

Canada, and Australia in 2014

Subaru’s 2014 calendar year retail sales have posted 

all-time  records  in  its  key  markets  of  the  U.S., 

Canada, and Australia. Subaru’s U.S. sales in partic-

ular  have  exceeded  a  500,000  unit  milestone  for 

the first time in its history, while also achieving six 

consecutive years of record sales and becoming the 

only manufacturer in the U.S. to post seven consec-

utive years of sales growth.

Subaru Debuts “EyeSight” 

Driving Support System in Europe

The all-new Outback launched in Europe during 2014 

was the first Subaru model built to European specifi-

cations that featured our proprietary EyeSight driving 

support system. EyeSight’s launch on the European 

market, following on from its introduction to the Jap-

FHI Subaru Visitor Center Sees 

One Million Visitors

Visitors to the Subaru Visitor Center, located within the 

anese, Australian, and North American markets, en-

Yajima Plant of the Gunma Manufacturing Division, 

ables FHI to extend EyeSight’s deployment across 

reached a cumulative total of 1 million people on 

markets globally.

September 8, 2014. The Center was opened on July 

15,  2003  to  commemorate  FHI's  50th  anniversary 

and hosts factory tours, mainly for elementary school 

students visiting as part of their social studies classes. 

During tours, visitors are given the opportunity to view 

automobile manufacturing processes.

5 Subaru Models Awarded 2015 TOP 

SAFETY PICK+ (TSP+) by IIHS in the U.S.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) in the 

U.S. has awarded the best possible ranking of TSP+ in 

2015 safety assessments of EyeSight-equipped 2015 

models  of  Legacy,  Outback,  Forester,  Impreza,  and 

Subaru XV currently sold in the North American region.

Cumulative Production of Horizontally-

Opposed SUBARU BOXER Engine Reaches 

15 Million Units

The  cumulative  total  of  horizontally-opposed 

SUBARU BOXER engines produced has reached 15 

million units. The achievement has come in the 49th 

year  since  our  water-cooled  4-cylinder  horizontal-

ly-opposed aluminum engine was developed in 1966 

and installed for the first time in the compact passen-

ger car Subaru 1000 in May of the same year.

Plant Constructed for Assembly of 

Center Wing Boxes for Boeing’s 777X

The New Subaru WRX’s Horizontally-

Opposed “DIT” Engine Named to 

2015 Ward’s “10 Best Engines”

The  U.S.  automotive  industry  trade  journal  Ward’s 

has named Subaru’s “FA20” 2.0-liter 4-cylinder hori-

FHI  has  begun  construction  of  its  third  assembly 

zontally-opposed direct injection turbo “DIT” engine 

facility for aircraft parts on the premises of its Handa 

in the U.S.-specification 2015 Subaru WRX a winner 

Plant located in Handa City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. 

of its 2015 Ward’s “10 Best Engines” award. This is 

At  the  new  facility,  FHI  plans  to  assemble  center 

the fourth time, coming after a two-year hiatus, that 

wing boxes for the U.S.’s Boeing Co.’s next-genera-

Subaru has won a prestigious Ward's “10 Best En-

tion passenger jet, the Boeing 777X. The new facili-

gines” accolade.

ty is scheduled to be completed in 2016.

A Message to Our Shareholders

We pursue sustainable growth as a compelling company 
with strong market presence and continued focus 
on our differentiation strategy.

Yasuyuki Yoshinaga
Representative Director of the Board, 
President and CEO

07

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.ANNUAL REPORT 2015A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message to Our Shareholders

We pursue sustainable growth as a compelling company 

with strong market presence and continued focus 

on our differentiation strategy.

Yasuyuki Yoshinaga

Representative Director of the Board, 

President and CEO

What is your evaluation of results for FYE March 2015?

Q1
A1 We posted record high results for a third straight year thanks to 
tireless effort by all divisions and subsidiaries in our Group.

Consolidated results for FYE March 2015 were 910,700 vehicles sold 
(an increase of 10.4 percent compared with the previous fiscal year), 
net sales of 2,877.9 billion yen (up 19.5 percent), operating income of 
423.0 billion yen (up 29.6 percent), and net income of 261.9 billion yen 
(up 26.7 percent), all of which were record numbers for the third year 
in a row. Our operating margin also increased to 14.7% from 
13.6% last year.

It is clear that continued weakness in the yen’s exchange rate 
was a substantial factor in these improved results. However, I think 
that behind this three-year achievement of record performance are 

compounded efforts by all subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and 
divisions in our Group who seized this tail wind and did not rest on 
their  laurels.  Our  Development  units  delivered  new,  extremely 
competitive models, such as Legacy/Outback, to market this fiscal 
year.  In  addition,  all  manufacturing  departments  continuously 
operated at near-maximum capacity in order to respond to robust 
demand. Not only our Automotive Business, but also our Aerospace 
Company and Industrial Products Company each steadily grew 
their results.

Q2
What do you see as the reason for strong sales in the U.S.?
A2 Rapid growth continues as we garner high evaluations 

for our safety performance.

Last year, in 2014, the approximately 510,000 new vehicles sold in 
the U.S. market represented nearly a three-fold increase over the 
180,000  or  so  recorded  in  2008.  This  growth  cannot  be  solely 
explained by the strength of the U.S. business environment and the 
expanding demand for new vehicles. During this period, there has 
been increased demand in the U.S. market for SUVs, where Subaru 
is strong. However, I believe that the greatest factor leading to our 
increased sales has been many Subaru models receiving top marks 
in safety tests by U.S. rating agencies, solidifying an image in 
American consumers' minds that Subaru is committed to safety.

  Normally, this level of rapid growth would start to show signs of 
tapering off, but we have been seeing increasing momentum since 
launching  our  new  Legacy/Outback  models  last  year.  Minimal 
weakness in sales of models that have not been recently revamped, 
as well as our ability to hold sales incentives to the lowest level in the 
industry, is proof that the Subaru brand is extensively supported in 
the U.S. market.
  We have set a target of 540,000 units in the U.S. market in 2015, 
yet our local dealers have requested supply increases, reporting that 
they can aim for a higher target.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

08

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
A Message to Our Shareholders

Q3
How do you plan to grow your business in the U.S. in the future?
A3 We will aim to build a solid customer base in the U.S. market 
by expanding production capacity, introducing PHEV that meet 
environmental regulations, and strengthening our after-sales service.

Under Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA), our local subsidiary in the U.S. 
market,  we  are  continuing  to  enhance  the  quality  of  our  sales 
network, with a total of 625 dealers at present. Our growth strategy 
is not to increase the number of dealers, but rather to increase the 
number of units sold at each dealer. The result has led to an estab-
lished  understanding  that  “becoming  a  Subaru  franchise  will 
increase sales,” which fuels a positive cycle of competent dealers 
gathering around us.

In order to further accelerate our business in the U.S., three 
policy  measures  are  built  into  our  mid-term  management 
vision,  “Prominence  2020,”  announced  in  May  2014.  The  first  is 
introducing a new multi passenger three-row model, which we 
currently have under  development and is strongly requested 
by local dealers. The second is expanding production capacity 
at our subsidiary Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA) to take our 
current 200,000-unit production to nearly 400,000 units by the end 
of 2016. And the third is support for the environment. In response 

to the ZEV regulations in the U.S. that will be applied to new models 
starting in the 2018MY, we have announced plans for a plug-in 
hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) featuring the compelling driving expe-
rience that is Subaru’s hallmark.

This year, SOA announced these policy measures at the gath-
ering for our U.S. dealers held in Indianapolis and received a spirited 
reaction from those in attendance. These measures are a message 
to our U.S. dealers that “Subaru will pour its full support into the U.S. 
market, so please feel no anxiety about investing in your dealer-
ship.” Of particular importance is strengthening our after-sales 
service. Even in the continually robust U.S. market, there will be an 
economic pullback at some point. Until that time, it is all the more 
important  to  build  a  solid  customer  base,  for  which  enhancing 
after-sales service is indispensable. Therefore we plan to offer, along-
side SOA, our full investment support for dealers’ service facilities 
going forward.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

09

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
Q3

How do you plan to grow your business in the U.S. in the future?

A3 We will aim to build a solid customer base in the U.S. market 

by expanding production capacity, introducing PHEV that meet 

environmental regulations, and strengthening our after-sales service.

Under Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA), our local subsidiary in the U.S. 

to the ZEV regulations in the U.S. that will be applied to new models 

market,  we  are  continuing  to  enhance  the  quality  of  our  sales 

starting in the 2018MY, we have announced plans for a plug-in 

network, with a total of 625 dealers at present. Our growth strategy 

hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) featuring the compelling driving expe-

is not to increase the number of dealers, but rather to increase the 

rience that is Subaru’s hallmark.

number of units sold at each dealer. The result has led to an estab-

This year, SOA announced these policy measures at the gath-

lished  understanding  that  “becoming  a  Subaru  franchise  will 

ering for our U.S. dealers held in Indianapolis and received a spirited 

increase sales,” which fuels a positive cycle of competent dealers 

reaction from those in attendance. These measures are a message 

gathering around us.

to our U.S. dealers that “Subaru will pour its full support into the U.S. 

In order to further accelerate our business in the U.S., three 

market, so please feel no anxiety about investing in your dealer-

policy  measures  are  built  into  our  mid-term  management 

ship.” Of particular importance is strengthening our after-sales 

vision,  “Prominence  2020,”  announced  in  May  2014.  The  first  is 

service. Even in the continually robust U.S. market, there will be an 

introducing a new multi passenger three-row model, which we 

economic pullback at some point. Until that time, it is all the more 

currently have under development and is strongly requested 

important  to  build  a  solid  customer  base,  for  which  enhancing 

by local dealers. The second is expanding production capacity 

after-sales service is indispensable. Therefore we plan to offer, along-

at our subsidiary Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA) to take our 

side SOA, our full investment support for dealers’ service facilities 

current 200,000-unit production to nearly 400,000 units by the end 

going forward.

of 2016. And the third is support for the environment. In response 

A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message to Our Shareholders

Please share your outlook for FYE March 2016.

Q4
A4 We forecast consolidated net sales of 3,030 billion yen 
and consolidated operating income of 503.0 billion yen 
on the back of increasing sales in a consistently strong U.S. market.

In terms of consolidated results for FYE March 2016, we are planning 
for 928,300 units for the number of vehicles sold, net sales of 3,030 
billion yen, and operating income of 503.0 billion yen. These figures 
were not created a priori, but rather were calculated from budgets 
based on diligent analysis of conditions by each division. Our initial 
decisions were made with calculations assuming an exchange rate 
of  115  yen/US$.  Afterwards,  however,  as  the  yen  moved  further 
downward relative to the dollar, we announced final forecast numbers 
assuming 118 yen/US$.
  Reassessing conditions in each region, we see stronger sales 
in the U.S. than expected, and we may even be able to post results 
exceeding  forecasts.  At  the  same  time,  conditions  in  Russia  and 
other  regions  are  more  severe  than  they  were  when  we  set  our 
plans. In the Japan market, our plan was for decreased sales with 

the prospect that the “new model effect” has run its course and the 
outlook shows demand settling down, but April and May of this year 
have continued to bring higher sales than expected, which may lead 
to  results  exceeding  forecasts.  Although  there  are  these  regional 
differences, our largest market, the U.S., remains strong and I am 
confident that we will be able to achieve our targets overall.

How are you putting effort into initiatives to maintain sustainable growth going forward?

Q5
A5 We are working on thorough differentiation of our products and businesses, 

aiming for a “prominent” presence in the minds of our customers.

In  order  for  FHI,  which  is  a  small  automaker,  to  survive  in  this 
market, it is indispensable for us to focus our business resources 
on specific markets and products, while clearly standing apart from 
competitors. This strategy of ”differentiation” forms the core of our 
business strategy and is the principle behind our concept of “promi-
nence,” which is the key word in the title of our mid-term manage-
ment vision guiding us to stand above the crowd. The concept is not 
simply  prominence  with  respect  to  other  companies;  the  simple 
word  encapsulates  our  aim  for  “Subaru  to  have  a  prominent 
presence in the minds of our customers,” which makes it a very high 
hurdle indeed. This objective does not stop where the slogan ends. 
Each and every member of all divisions is called upon to thoroughly 
consider  what  it  means  to  be  “prominent  in  the  minds  of  our 
customers” and how to implement that in their work.

  A specific approach to this is embodied in our efforts to focus on 
the two key activities of “Enhancing the Subaru brand” and “Building 
a  strong  business  structure.”  In  order  for  the  Subaru  brand  to  be 
prominent  in  the  hearts  and  minds  of  our  customers,  we  must 
continue to stay one step ahead of competitors with respect to our 
greatest strengths: safety features and drivability. Also, in order to 
improve  our  market  competitiveness  and  continue  to  meet  the 
expectations of our shareholders, it is absolutely necessary to take 
cost reductions to a new level, push operating efficiencies forward, 
and strengthen our business platform.

Even though business results are as favorable as they are, now is 
the very time for all FHI employees to redouble our efforts and continue 
to have a positive sense of urgency and even anxiety as we work to 
further strengthen our brand and our business competitiveness.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

10

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
A Message to Our Shareholders

What increased amounts are you targeting for your R&D expenses and capital expenditures?

Q6
A6 We will continue to pursue stronger R&D, increased production capacity, 

and improved workplace environments to respond to safety and 
environmental requirements.

In our consolidated three-year investment plan from FYE March 
2015 to 2017, we initially allocated 250.0 billion yen to our R&D 
expenses and 330.0 billion yen to capital expenditures. Subsequent 
upward revisions, however, have taken into account the trend of 
positive results since announcing the plan. Our new allocations are 
for 280.0 billion yen and 400.0 billion yen in R&D expenses and 
capital expenditures respectively.

In  recent  years,  as  each  company  launches  vehicles  with 
automatic brake assist and other features, development competition 
for safety technologies has reached a new, more challenging level. 
Against this backdrop, Subaru’s EyeSight has garnered the highest 
safety test approval ratings in the industry and we will continue to 
actively push our R&D forward so that we can maintain this superiority 

in  safety  features  into  the  future.  In  addition,  as  environmental 
regulations strengthen in regions across the globe, we will dedicate 
effort  toward  ever  greater  fuel  efficiency  for  internal  combustion 
systems, as well as toward developing PHEV. And furthermore, we 
are actively hiring new and experienced engineers in order to further 
strengthen our R&D programs.
  At the same time, with regard to investing in facilities, our focus 
has centered on building out production facilities so that we can 
relieve our backlog of undelivered vehicles, though we would also 
like to invest in the as yet unaddressed need to gradually renovate 
aged  facilities  and  enhance  the  workplace  environment  at  our 
business sites.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

11

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message to Our Shareholders

Q6

What increased amounts are you targeting for your R&D expenses and capital expenditures?

A6 We will continue to pursue stronger R&D, increased production capacity, 

and improved workplace environments to respond to safety and 

environmental requirements.

In our consolidated three-year investment plan from FYE March 

in  safety  features  into  the  future.  In  addition,  as  environmental 

2015 to 2017, we initially allocated 250.0 billion yen to our R&D 

regulations strengthen in regions across the globe, we will dedicate 

expenses and 330.0 billion yen to capital expenditures. Subsequent 

effort  toward  ever  greater  fuel  efficiency  for  internal  combustion 

upward revisions, however, have taken into account the trend of 

systems, as well as toward developing PHEV. And furthermore, we 

positive results since announcing the plan. Our new allocations are 

are actively hiring new and experienced engineers in order to further 

for 280.0 billion yen and 400.0 billion yen in R&D expenses and 

strengthen our R&D programs.

capital expenditures respectively.

  At the same time, with regard to investing in facilities, our focus 

In  recent  years,  as  each  company  launches  vehicles  with 

has centered on building out production facilities so that we can 

automatic brake assist and other features, development competition 

relieve our backlog of undelivered vehicles, though we would also 

for safety technologies has reached a new, more challenging level. 

like to invest in the as yet unaddressed need to gradually renovate 

Against this backdrop, Subaru’s EyeSight has garnered the highest 

aged  facilities  and  enhance  the  workplace  environment  at  our 

safety test approval ratings in the industry and we will continue to 

business sites.

actively push our R&D forward so that we can maintain this superiority 

Please tell us about your initiatives for diversity and fostering leaders of the next generation.

Q7
A7 While working to cultivate human capital with diverse skills and 

business acumen, we are also dedicating effort to creating workplace 
environments that support the active contribution of female employees.

Needless to say, it is important to continually train employees who 
will be potential candidates for next-generation leaders, and to also 
ensure smooth transitions from one leadership generation to the next, 
so that our business can realize sustainable growth. Consequently, 
FHI will foster not just one or two employees, but a sizeable group, 
whose members are candidates for next-generation leaders, while 
we select exceptional employees from the ranks of middle managers 
to assume executive roles so that the management can stay fresh 
and nimble. One link in this approach is to actively implement job 
rotation  across  divisions  for  mid-career  employees  and  middle 
managers,  where  they  are  moved  from  domestic  positions  to 
overseas positions, or from technical positions to sales positions, 
and so on. We are striving to train a team of employees with a broad 
range of work skills and business instincts.

  Moreover, in order for our Company to maintain a robust level 
of  business  going  forward,  diversity  promotion,  in  addition  to  our 
training of next-generation leaders, is indispensable. FHI established 
a Diversity Promotion Office in 2014 and is chiefly devoting effort to 
establishing  an  environment  supportive  of  female  employees' 
contribution to the company, while also providing training support for 
female managers. Also, since April 2015, a career-long FHI female 
executive has served as director of the Human Resources Depart-
ment, which is in charge of the Diversity Promotion Office. As we 
continue into the future, we hope to actively promote excellent 
human capital regardless of age, gender, or nationality, so that we will 
be able to grow as an organization with an even higher level of active 
employee involvement.

Please explain a bit about the Subaru Next Story Project started in April 2015.

Q8
A8 We are utilizing the Internet, social networking services, etc. 

to roll out a diverse array of projects to support the active lifestyles 
of Subaru drivers. 

In our mid-term management vision, “Prominence 2020,” we 
indicated our goal to “elevate the brand-customer relationship to a 
new level” as one of our initiatives toward focusing on “enhancing 
the Subaru brand.” We started the Subaru Next Story Project, led by 
young and mid-career employees, in order to put this sentiment into 
action.  The  project  takes  advantage  of  the  Internet  and  social 
networking services to encourage customers to enjoy their Subaru 
even more and to have a fulfilling lifestyle thanks in part to their 

Subaru vehicle. At the same time, the project is also an initiative to 
deepen our connection to customers and to introduce activities that 
we can enjoy together with them.

In this project, we develop and implement a variety of ideas to 
encourage the active lifestyles of our customers. To be specific, we 
use a website to provide information on driving lessons, sports and 
outdoor events, and other activities organized by Subaru; and we use 
social networking services to facilitate exchange between users.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

12

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
A Message to Our Shareholders

Q9
Please provide some information on your initiatives to strengthen corporate governance.
A9 While incorporating outside counsel and listening to feedback from society, 

we strive for suitable information disclosure practices and 
increased business transparency.

FHI has followed a practice of appointing professionals and experts 
with  business  experience  as  outside  directors  and  auditors, 
and accepting valuable advice and instruction from external 
perspectives.  Going  forward,  we  will  implement  measures, 
including increasing our number of outside directors and auditors, to 
strive  to  more  conscientiously  reflect  outside  opinions  and 
community input in our business decisions. Additionally, we will 
devote effort to prompt and appropriate information disclosure and 
further  business  transparency  following  the  content  of  each 
provision of the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance 
Code taking effect from June 1, 2015.

  At present, we are putting particular effort into more extreme 
quality control as one of our thematic focuses regarding governance 
and CSR management. Amid continuing robust sales, each of our 
production sites has been operating at near-maximum capacity in 
recent years. However, it is absolutely inexcusable for quality 
control to suffer as production excels. Our Production units are 
being made thoroughly aware of their responsibility to stop the line 
if they are not absolutely confident in the quality of products.

In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 

  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 

had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 

yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 

rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 

cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 

level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 

comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 

exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 

14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 

profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 

to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 

main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 

all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 

exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 

The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 

volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.

in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 

Do you have a closing message for shareholders?

Q10
A10 FHI is committed to thorough and reliable automobile development and 

manufacturing, while striving for sustainable growth and 
preservation of the highest profit margins in the industry.

Aiming to be “A Compelling Company with Strong Market 
Presence”—that is the management philosophy of FHI. In order 
to realize this goal, we will continue to follow our principle that 
“Customers  Come  First,”  while  demonstrating  thorough 
and reliable automobile development and manufacturing, and 

delivering  enjoyment  and  peace  of  mind  to  customers.  At  the 
same time, we will continue to earn the trust of our shareholders 
by  bringing  about  sustainable  growth  while  securing  our 
industry-leading high operating margin. Thank you for your support 
and feedback going forward.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

13

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 

yen going forward.

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 

realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 

the future.

Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 

  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 

March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 

U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 

flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 

regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 

a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 

ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 

into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 

more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 

an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 

safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 

the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 

future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 

largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 

capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 

payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 

from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 

approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 

competitive environment.

operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 

  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 

March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 

2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 

to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 

plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 

year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 

income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 

half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 

three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 

taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 

we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 

performance.

total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 

1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 

were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 

show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 

approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 

for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 

steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 

a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 

expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 

and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 

we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 

expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 

and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 

initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 

the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 

capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

 
A Message to Our Shareholders

A Message from the CFO

Q9

Please provide some information on your initiatives to strengthen corporate governance.

A9 While incorporating outside counsel and listening to feedback from society, 

we strive for suitable information disclosure practices and 

increased business transparency.

FHI has followed a practice of appointing professionals and experts 

  At present, we are putting particular effort into more extreme 

with  business  experience  as  outside  directors  and  auditors, 

quality control as one of our thematic focuses regarding governance 

and accepting valuable advice and instruction from external 

and CSR management. Amid continuing robust sales, each of our 

perspectives.  Going  forward,  we  will  implement  measures, 

production sites has been operating at near-maximum capacity in 

including increasing our number of outside directors and auditors, to 

recent years. However, it is absolutely inexcusable for quality 

strive  to  more  conscientiously  reflect  outside  opinions  and 

control to suffer as production excels. Our Production units are 

community input in our business decisions. Additionally, we will 

being made thoroughly aware of their responsibility to stop the line 

devote effort to prompt and appropriate information disclosure and 

if they are not absolutely confident in the quality of products.

further  business  transparency  following  the  content  of  each 

provision of the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance 

Code taking effect from June 1, 2015.

Q10

Do you have a closing message for shareholders?

A10 FHI is committed to thorough and reliable automobile development and 

manufacturing, while striving for sustainable growth and 

preservation of the highest profit margins in the industry.

Aiming to be “A Compelling Company with Strong Market 

delivering  enjoyment  and  peace  of  mind  to  customers.  At  the 

Presence”—that is the management philosophy of FHI. In order 

same time, we will continue to earn the trust of our shareholders 

to realize this goal, we will continue to follow our principle that 

by  bringing  about  sustainable  growth  while  securing  our 

“Customers  Come  First,”  while  demonstrating  thorough 

industry-leading high operating margin. Thank you for your support 

and reliable automobile development and manufacturing, and 

and feedback going forward.

We will keep high profit levels while making aggressive and proactive 
investments for the future in order to realize sustainable growth 
as well as stable and continuous return of profit to shareholders.

Mitsuru Takahashi
Director of the Board
Corporate Executive Vice President and CFO

Boosting R&D expenses and capital expenditures 
to further improve our market competitiveness

In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 
In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 
yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 
yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 
level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 
level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 
14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 
14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 

main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 
main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 
exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 
exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 
volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.
volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.
  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 
  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 
rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 
rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 
comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 
comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 
profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 
profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 

all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 
all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 
The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 
The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 
in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 
in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 
had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 
had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 
cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 
cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 
exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 
exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 
to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 
to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 

Three-Year Changes in Operating Income

+70.3

+12.4

-66.6

+103.7

-23.2

423.0

+19.7

-24.0

+51.1

-10.9

326.5

+170.2

+29.3

-65.0

+31.5

+81.7

-1.0

120.4

44.0

Operating income
FYE March 2012

Improvement of
sales volume &
mixture and others

Cost
reduction

Gain on
currency
exchange

SG&A expenses
and others

R&D
expenses

Operating income
FYE March 2013

Gain on
currency
exchange

Improvement of
sales volume &
mixture and others

Cost
reduction

SG&A expenses
and others

R&D
expenses

Operating income
FYE March 2014

Gain on
currency
exchange

Improvement of
sales volume &
mixture and others

Cost
reduction

SG&A expenses
and others

R&D
expenses

Operating income
FYE March 2015

+76.4 billion yen

+206.1 billion yen

+96.6 billion yen

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

14

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 

free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 

yen going forward.

yen going forward.

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 

realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 

realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 

the future.

the future.

Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 

Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 

  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 

  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 

March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 

March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 

U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 

U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 

flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 

flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 

regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 

regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 

a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 

a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 

ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 

ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 

into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 

into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 

more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 

more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 

an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 

an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 

safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 

safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 

the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 

the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 

future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 

future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 

largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 

largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 

capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 

capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 

payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 

payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 

from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 

from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 

approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 

approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 

competitive environment.

competitive environment.

operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 

operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 

  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 

  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 

March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 

March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 

2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 

2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 

to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 

to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 

plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 

plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 

year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 

year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 

income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 

income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 

half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 

half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 

three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 

three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 

taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 

taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 

we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 

we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 

performance.

performance.

total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 

total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 

1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 

1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 

were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 

were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 

show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 

show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 

approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 

approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 

for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 

for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 

steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 

steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 

a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 

a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 

expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 

expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 

and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 

and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 

we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 

we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 

expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 

expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 

and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 

and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 

initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 

initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 

the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 

the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 

capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

 
 
In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 

  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 

had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 

yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 

rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 

cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 

level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 

comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 

exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 

14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 

profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 

to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 

main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 

all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 

exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 

The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 

volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.

in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 

A Message from the CFO

Three-Year Business Operation / Profit Plan

(Total of FYE2015–2017)

Net sales

Operating income

Currency rate assumption: 95 yen/US$

8 trillion yen

1 trillion yen

Revised Three-Year Investment Plan

(Total of FYE2015–2017)

R&D expenses

Capital expenditures

Depreciation & amortization

Original plan

Revised plan

250 billion yen
(+59%)

280 billion yen
(+78%)

330 billion yen
(+71%)

200 billion yen
(+22%)

400 billion yen
(+107%)

210 billion yen
(+28%)

( ): vs. previous 3 fiscal-year (FYE2012–FYE2014) period

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 
realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 
the future.
  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 
U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 
regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 
ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 
more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 
safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 
future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 
capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 
from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 
competitive environment.
  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 
2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 
plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 
income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 
three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 
we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 
total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 
1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 
show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 
for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 
a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 
and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 
expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 
initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 
capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

15

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

A certain amount of free cash flows maintained 
while expanding proactive investments for the future
Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 
March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 
flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 
a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 
into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 
an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 
the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 
largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 
payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 
approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 
operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 
March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 
to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 
year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 
half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 
taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 
performance.

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 
were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 
approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 
steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 
expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 
we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 
and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 
the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 
believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 

yen going forward.

 
In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 

In FYE March 2015, FHI posted an operating income of 423.0 billion 

  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 

  Although this fiscal year, excluding the boost from exchange 

had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 

had to be shipped by air on short notice in order to work around the 

yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 

yen, a 96.6 billion yen increase year on year, and a record high profit 

rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 

rates,  showed  a  drop  in  profit  of  7.1  billion  yen,  this  result,  in 

cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 

cargo delays in U.S. ports. Furthermore, as weakness in the yen 

level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 

level for the third straight year. In addition, our operating margin of 

comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 

comparison to the previous fiscal year's 35.9 billion yen increase in 

exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 

exceeded expectations this fiscal year, we intentionally chose not 

14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 

14.7% maintained its place among the highest in our industry. The 

profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 

profit, also excluding the benefit from exchange rates, does not at 

to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 

to book the increase as additional profit and instead funneled 

main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 

main driver of our profit increase was 103.7 billion yen from foreign 

all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 

all indicate a decrease in profit generating capability year on year. 

exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 

exchange gain, in addition to 70.3 billion yen from an improved sales 

The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 

The special temporary factor this fiscal year was 10.5 billion yen 

volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.

volume and mixture and 12.4 billion yen from cost reduction.

in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 

in logistics expenses for local production vehicle components that 

A Message from the CFO

A Message from the CFO

Three-Year Business Operation / Profit Plan

(Total of FYE2015–2017)

Net sales

Operating income

Currency rate assumption: 95 yen/US$

8 trillion yen

1 trillion yen

Revised Three-Year Investment Plan

(Total of FYE2015–2017)

R&D expenses

Capital expenditures

Depreciation & amortization

Original plan

Revised plan

250 billion yen

280 billion yen

(+59%)

(+78%)

330 billion yen

400 billion yen

(+71%)

(+107%)

200 billion yen

210 billion yen

(+22%)

(+28%)

( ): vs. previous 3 fiscal-year (FYE2012–FYE2014) period

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 

it toward R&D expenses and capital expenditures as a way to 

realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 

realize sustainable growth through proactive investments for 

the future.

the future.

A certain amount of free cash flows maintained 

while expanding proactive investments for the future

Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 

Next,  I  will  explain  our  finances.  FHI’s  free  cash  flows  in  FYE 

  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 

  At present, FHI is enjoying favorable sales centered on the 

March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 

March 2015 amounted to 138.8 billion yen. Since we posted cash 

U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 

U.S. market. Going forward, however, we expect environmental 

flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 

flows of 279.1 billion yen in FYE March 2014, this appears to be 

regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 

regulations in markets around the world to strengthen, including 

a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 

a  reduction  by  half,  unless  special  temporary  factors  are  taken 

ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 

ZEV  regulations  in  California  and  other  states,  and  we  predict 

into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 

into account. As I also noted last year, the first special factor was 

more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 

more  intense  competition  in  the  development  of  advanced 

an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 

an almost 50 billion yen cash inflow in FYE March 2014 due to 

safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 

safety technology with the prospect of automated driving in the 

the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 

the sale of Polaris stock, a U.S. company of which FHI was the 

future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 

future. At FHI, we plan to continue boosting R&D expenses and 

largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 

largest shareholder. Another factor was due to the timing of tax 

capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 

capital  expenditures,  taking  advantage  of  the  current  tail  wind 

payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 

payments. In FYE March 2014, we had an unrecorded expense of 

from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 

from  favorable  financial  results  in  order  to  survive  this  highly 

approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 

approximately 90 billion yen cash-out for corporate tax, due to net 

competitive environment.

competitive environment.

operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 

operating loss carryforwards from past terms. This affected FYE 

  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 

  Under  our  new  mid-term  management  vision,  “Prominence 

March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 

March 2015 with an inflated 190.0 billion yen cash-out, equivalent 

2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 

2020,” announced in May 2014, we outlined a consolidated profit 

to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 

to a year and half of corporate taxes, due to the previous fiscal 

plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 

plan (see table on this page) targeting total net sales, total operating 

year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 

year’s corporate and other taxes on top of the interim payment of 

income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 

income, total R&D expenses, and total capital expenditures over the 

half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 

half our annual corporate and other taxes, as required by the 

three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 

three years from FYE March 2015 to 2017. When preparing the plan, 

taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 

taxation system that bases payments on previous fiscal year 

we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 

we assumed an exchange rate of 95 yen/US$, targeting three-year 

performance.

performance.

total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 

total  net  sales  of  8,000  billion  yen  and  total  operating  income  of 

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 

Excluding these special factors, our actual free cash flows 

1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 

1,000  billion  yen.  Current  exchange  rate  expectations,  however, 

were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 

were approximately 140.0 billion yen in FYE March 2014 and 

show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 

show a large shift in the direction of a weaker yen and prospects 

approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 

approximately 200.0 billion yen in FYE March 2015, reflecting 

for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 

for  significantly  exceeding  those  targets.  We  have  decided  on 

steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 

steady  improvement  in  cash  flow  generation  accompanying 

a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 

a policy for taking surplus profits from favorable exchange rates 

expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 

expansion  in  business.  From  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond, 

and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 

and  proactively  channeling  them  to  R&D  expenses  and  capital 

we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 

we plan to increase the previously mentioned R&D expenses 

expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 

expenditures, raising the three-year total of R&D expenses from the 

and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 

and  boost  capital  expenditures  as  proactive  investment  for 

initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 

initial 250.0 billion yen to 280.0 billion yen, and likewise the total of 

the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 

the future. Since we also forecast increased levels of sales, I 

capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

capital expenditures from 330.0 billion yen to 400.0 billion yen.

believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

believe that even with this investment policy we can maintain 

Free Cash Flows & Shareholders’ Equity to Total Assets

(Billions of yen)

Free cash flows

Shareholders’ equity to total assets

300

240

180

120

60

0

279.1

40.5

46.5

138.8

37.7

95.3

34.7

33.3

87.1

28.3

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

(FY)

(%)
50

40

30

20

10

0

operating environment and performance forecasts as close to 
the  payout  date  as  possible.  With  this  in  mind,  we  have  not 
decided on our dividend plans for FYE March 2016 at this point.
Furthermore, we expect ROE (return on equity) to go down 
in the future as shareholders’ equity increases. FHI does not 
directly  base  dividend  payout  determinations  on  ROE.  Going 
forward,  however,  we  want  to  both  strengthen  our  financial 
position  and  make  continuous  and  stable  returns  of  profit 
to  shareholders  while  keeping  in  mind  the  balance  of  our 
shareholders’ equity ratio and ROE.
  Although we are not large among automobile manufacturers, 
we have built a position as a company with distinct individuality 
in  major  markets  inside  and  outside  Japan  by  concentrating  our 
limited  resources  on  limited  markets  and  products.  With  our 
mid-term  management  vision  “Prominence  2020,”  FHI  aims  to 
achieve sustainable growth through proactive and future-oriented 
investment  and  the  securing  of  a  fundamentally  high  level  of 
profitability. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support 
for the future.

free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 
free cash flows within a range of 150.0 billion to 200.0 billion 
yen going forward.
yen going forward.

Entering a new stage of shareholder returns while 
striving to further enhance our financial position

Last, let me explain our policy of returning profits to shareholders. 
FHI's  basic  dividend  policy  is  to  have  stable  and  continuous 
payouts while considering performance-linked benefits. We have 
announced that the consolidated payout ratio would be between 
20 and 40 percent in order to link dividends to performance. This 
leeway in dividend payout ratio is to absorb a drop in dividends 
within this 20-point range whereby a 20 percent level is set as the 
basis for the income increase and a maximum of 40 percent is 
set for the income decrease.
  Compared to larger automakers, FHI's financial position has 
not  been  especially  airtight.  Consequently,  we  have  focused 
on  retained  earnings  up  to  this  point  and  have  tried  to  hold  a 
20%  minimum  payout  ratio.  At  the  same  time,  however,  our 
financial  position  has  steadily  improved  in  line  with  increased 
business in the last several years. Shareholders’ equity to total 
assets reached 46.5% in FYE March 2015 and it might very well 
top 50% within FYE March 2016. So we see our operations as 
having  entered  a  new  stage  in  FYE  March  2016  and  beyond 
and  we  plan  to  return  profits  to  shareholders  without  overly 
emphasizing a 20% payout ratio, even though profits continue 
to increase. However, we will carefully determine what ratio is 
appropriate within the 20-40% range after closely judging our 

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

16

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
Special Feature

PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Leveraging Safety to Stand Out in the World
Subaru pursues automotive safety through development, design, production, 
and sales, for which we have won praise throughout the world.
At Subaru, we design vehicles that reflect the voices of our customers; 
we build production capabilities that deliver quality and meet demand; 
and we constantly review and re-commit ourselves to the value that we offer.

17

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.ANNUAL REPORT 2015Introduction

Subaru pushes the evolution of its safety performance 
from all directions and continues to devote effort 
to reliable automobile manufacturing that delivers 
enjoyment and peace of mind to our customers.

EyeSight®

The new Legacy/Outback models garnered 
the highest performance ratings in Japanese, U.S., 
and European safety tests

Under its brand statement of “Confidence in Motion,” FHI is 
committed to reliable automobile manufacturing that delivers 
enjoyment and peace of mind to our customers. In order to 
spur the evolution of the vehicle safety features that support 
this “enjoyment and peace of mind,” we follow a philosophy 
of  “All-Around  Safety”  and  strive  for  revolutionary  safety 
technology from all fronts: active safety, passive safety, and 
pre-crash safety.
  Amongst these technologies, the state-of-the-art Eye-
Sight on board new Legacy/Outback earned full marks in 
preventative safety performance assessments conducted 
by NASVA1 and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Trans-
port and Tourism. Like Levorg, Forester, and Subaru XV 
Hybrid, these new models were selected to receive the top 
JNCAP  ASV+  rating.  In  addition,  new  Outback  outfitted 
with EyeSight earned the highest marks in the 2014 Euro-
pean New Car Assessment Program. Furthermore, all five 
models  with  EyeSight  on  board  sold  in  the  U.S.  market 
received 2015 Top Safety Pick+ awards, the highest evalu-
ation possible by the IIHS.2 These industry-leading safety 
features  recognized  and  awarded  by  ratings  agencies 
throughout the world are what bring the Subaru brand the 
trust and support of its customers.

1 NASVA = National Agency for Automobile Safety and Victims' Aid
2 IIHS = Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Control & Braking Systems

Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive

Active Torque Vectoring

SUBARU ALL AROUND SAFETY

Visibility & Child Safety

Protective Systems

SUBARU Rear Vehicle Detection

18

Special Feature

PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Leveraging Safety to Stand Out in the World

Subaru pursues automotive safety through development, design, production, 

and sales, for which we have won praise throughout the world.

At Subaru, we design vehicles that reflect the voices of our customers; 

we build production capabilities that deliver quality and meet demand; 

and we constantly review and re-commit ourselves to the value that we offer.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.ANNUAL REPORT 2015the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 

brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 

performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 

being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 

After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-

throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 

back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 

advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 

feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 

present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 

visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 

various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 

which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 

assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 

also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-

highest level of assessments in various safety tests.

back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 

  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 

U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 

performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 

variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 

new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 

and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 

to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 

would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 

so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 

customers’ lifestyles.

not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 

  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 

fulfilling lives for our customers.

particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 

comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 

accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 

collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 

contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 

appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 

of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 

an automaker.

Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-

step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 

There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 

tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 

initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 

addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 

safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 

functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 

the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-

mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-

al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-

user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 

performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-

ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 

of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

Development of the new Legacy/Outback started with 
careful consideration of what kind of vehicle will bring 
more fulfillment to our customers’ lifestyles.

Masayuki Uchida
Corporate Vice President, 
Senior General Manager of the Subaru Engineering Division
(Previously Senior Project General Manager 
of the Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division)

Professional Background

Joined Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. 

April 1981:  
November 2003:   General Manager, Body Design Department, Subaru Engineering Division
April 2005:  
March 2008:  
April 2010:  
April 2011:  
April 2015:  

General Manager, Exterior Design Department, Subaru Engineering Division
General Manager, Subaru Engineering Division
PGM, Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division
Senior PGM, Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division
Corporate Vice President, Senior General Manager, Subaru Engineering Division

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

19

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 

in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 

“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 

level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 

that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 

would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 

the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 

every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 

supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.

way that development is done.

tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 

  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 

moving parts.

value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 

be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 

physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 

had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 

that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-

finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 

ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 

response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 

like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 

were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 

design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 

the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 

fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-

tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 

the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 

circumstances.

  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 

conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 

driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-

ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 

safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 

though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 

weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 

compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 

boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 

features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 

even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 

new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

 
 
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

If our cars are not reassuring enough so that anyone can ride 
in them with peace of mind, they will not be able to act 
as a partner for supporting customers' lifestyles.

Development of the new Legacy/Outback started with 

careful consideration of what kind of vehicle will bring 

more fulfillment to our customers’ lifestyles.

Masayuki Uchida

Corporate Vice President, 

Senior General Manager of the Subaru Engineering Division

(Previously Senior Project General Manager 

of the Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division)

Professional Background

April 1981:  

Joined Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. 

November 2003:   General Manager, Body Design Department, Subaru Engineering Division

April 2005:  

General Manager, Exterior Design Department, Subaru Engineering Division

March 2008:  

General Manager, Subaru Engineering Division

April 2010:  

April 2011:  

April 2015:  

PGM, Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division

Senior PGM, Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division

Corporate Vice President, Senior General Manager, Subaru Engineering Division

We have thoroughly pursued safety performance 
more than anything else in order to support 
fulfilling lifestyles for our customers

After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-
After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-
back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 
back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 
feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 
feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 
visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 
visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 
which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 
which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 
also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-
also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-
back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 
back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 
U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 
U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 
variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 
variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 
and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 
and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 
would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 
would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 
customers’ lifestyles.
customers’ lifestyles.
  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 
  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 
particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 
particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 
comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 
comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 
accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 
accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 
collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 
collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 
contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 
contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 
appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 
appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 
of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 
of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 
an automaker.
an automaker.

There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 
There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 
initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 
initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 
safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 
safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 

the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 
the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 
brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 
brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 
performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 
performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 
being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 
being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 
throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 
throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 
advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 
advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 
present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 
present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 
various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 
various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 
assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 
assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 
highest level of assessments in various safety tests.
highest level of assessments in various safety tests.
  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 
  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 
performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 
performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 
new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 
new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 
to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 
to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 
so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 
so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 
not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 
not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 
fulfilling lives for our customers.
fulfilling lives for our customers.

Our development staff, to the person, have 
endeavored to improve and refine designs and 
the quality of drivability from our customers’ 
point of view

Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-
Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-
tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 
tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 
addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 
addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 
functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 
functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 

user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 
user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 
performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-
performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-
ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 
ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 
of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 
of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 
step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 
step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 
the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-
the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-
mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-
mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-
al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-
al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

20

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 

in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 

in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 

“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 

“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 

level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 

level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 

that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 

that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 

would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 

would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 

the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 

the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 

every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 

every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 

supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.

supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.

way that development is done.

way that development is done.

tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 

tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 

  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 

  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 

moving parts.

moving parts.

value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 

value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 

be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 

be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 

physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 

physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 

had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 

had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 

that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-

that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-

finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 

finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 

ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 

ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 

response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 

response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 

like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 

like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 

were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 

were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 

design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 

the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 

the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 

fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-

fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-

tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 

tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 

the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 

the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 

circumstances.

circumstances.

  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 

  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 

conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 

conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 

driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-

driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-

ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 

ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 

safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 

safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 

though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 

though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 

weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 

weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 

compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 

compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 

boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 

boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 

features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 

features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 

even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 

even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 

new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

 
 
 
 
the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 

brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 

performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 

being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 

After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-

throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 

back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 

advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 

feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 

present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 

visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 

various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 

which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 

assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 

also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-

highest level of assessments in various safety tests.

back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 

  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 

U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 

performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 

variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 

new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 

and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 

to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 

would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 

so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 

customers’ lifestyles.

not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 

  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 

fulfilling lives for our customers.

particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 

comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 

accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 

collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 

contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 

appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 

of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 

an automaker.

Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-

step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 

There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 

tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 

initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 

addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 

safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 

functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 

the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-

mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-

al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-

user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 

performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-

ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 

of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

The entire team was committed to thoroughly 
pursuing the performance customers demand, 
which is the Subaru way that development is done.

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 
in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 
that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 
every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 
tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 
moving parts.

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 
physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 
that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-
ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 
like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 
design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 
“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 
would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 
supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.
  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 
value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 
be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 
had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 
finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 
response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 
were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 
unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 
level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 
the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 
way that development is done.

We strove toward the dual goals of 
environmental performance and a comfortable 
driving experience, and were able to achieve 
high fuel efficiency in an AWD vehicle

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 
the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 
fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-
tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 
the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 
circumstances.
  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 
conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 
driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-
ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 
safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 
though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 
weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 
compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 
boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 
features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 
even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 
new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

21

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 

the  driving  force  behind  our  growth  has  been  trust  in  our 

brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 

brand, such that “Subaru = a vehicle with outstanding safety 

performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 

performance,”  which  comes  from  Subaru  safety  features 

being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 

being  highly  rated  in  safety  assessments  in  countries 

After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-

After taking charge of development for the new Legacy/Out-

throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 

throughout  the  world.  The  second  pillar  is  our  pursuit  of 

back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 

back,  I  first  dedicated  effort  to  incorporating  customer 

advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 

advanced safety technologies, as exemplified by EyeSight. At 

feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 

feedback as completely as possible. Part of that process was 

present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 

present,  automakers  have  brought  vehicles  to  market  with 

visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 

visiting  the  homes  of  owners,  mainly  in  the  U.S.  market, 

various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 

various  kinds  of  driver  support  technologies,  such  as  brake 

which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 

which has shown the strongest demand for these models. I 

assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 

assist. Despite the crowded field, EyeSight has garnered the 

also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-

also considered how to gain further support for Legacy/Out-

highest level of assessments in various safety tests.

highest level of assessments in various safety tests.

back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 

back and how to provide a reliable vehicle of course for the 

  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 

  Needless  to  say,  we  continued  our  pursuit  of  safety 

U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 

U.S.  market,  but  also  globally.  While  lending  an  ear  to  a 

performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 

performance  from  every  angle  in  the  development  of  the 

variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 

variety of opinions and requests, we thoroughly researched, 

new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 

new Legacy/Outback, including the adoption of the most up 

and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 

and implemented the results, regarding what kind of vehicle 

to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 

to date EyeSight ver. 3. If our cars are not reassuring enough 

would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 

would  bring  the  most  enjoyment  and  fulfillment  to  our 

so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 

so that anyone can ride in them with peace of mind, they will 

customers’ lifestyles.

customers’ lifestyles.

not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 

not be able to act as a partner for supporting enjoyable and 

  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 

  Of  the  stories  that  I  learned  from  customers,  I  was 

fulfilling lives for our customers.

fulfilling lives for our customers.

particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 

particularly  impressed  by  those  regarding  safety,  including 

comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 

comments like, “Although the car was badly damaged in an 

accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 

accident,  I  avoided  serious  harm  thanks  to  the  reliable 

collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 

collision  safety  performance.”  Every  time  that  I  came  in 

contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 

contact  with  these  examples  of  customer  gratitude  and 

appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 

appreciation, it reaffirmed my awareness of the importance 

of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 

of safety performance and of our great social responsibility as 

an automaker.

an automaker.

Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-

Development of the new Legacy/Outback strove for “emo-

step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 

step further by envisioning a design that positively presents 

There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 

There  are  two  pillars  to  Subaru’s  safety  performance 

tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 

tional  value”  in  the  new  design  and  driving  experience,  in 

initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 

initiatives. The first is our policy for “achieving a high level of 

addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 

addition  to  Subaru’s  already  established  competence  in 

safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 

safety performance for all vehicle models.” In actual practice, 

functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 

functional  value  from  safety  performance,  drivability,  and 

the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-

the  vehicle’s  achievement  of  high  functionality  and  perfor-

mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-

mance while keeping the importance of emphasizing function-

al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-

al  aesthetics.  As  our  flagship  models,  the  new  Legacy/Out-

user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 

user friendliness. The concept of “emphasizing function and 

performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-

performance for a real-world tool, with the design represent-

ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 

ing the results of that emphasis” was dominant in the minds 

of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 

of our development team. Our recent approach has gone one 

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Project General Manager (PGM) Interview

The entire team was committed to thoroughly 

pursuing the performance customers demand, 

which is the Subaru way that development is done.

We will continue our quest to 
develop high quality vehicles 
that exceed customers' expectations.

Imperatives to consider during design and development

•  Following the quality management cycle
•  Handling recalls
•  Pursuing safety features with our concept of 

“ALL-AROUND SAFETY”

•  Addressing fuel efficiency standards
•  Improving and proliferating certified low-emission vehicles
•  Recycling vehicles

Please see our CSR website for details.
•  Customers and Products (http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/envi/csr/csr/consumers/)
•  Environment (http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/envi/csr/csr/environment/environment.html)

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 

back feature superior drivability, safety, and reliability expressed 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 

quality  venturing  into  the  domain  of  human  sensibilities,  or 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 

of the development team argue that “we can settle for this 

in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 

in the dynamic and powerful body, and emphasize quality 

“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 

“emotional value” in other words. We strove for a vehicle that 

level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 

level.” The entire team was committed to thoroughly pursuing 

that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 

that appeals to all five senses. We have thoroughly polished 

would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 

would heighten satisfaction for drivers and act as a partner for 

the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 

the  performance  customers  demand,  which  is  the  Subaru 

every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 

every  small  detail,  from  the  feel  of  the  interior  and  other 

supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.

supporting their fulfilling lifestyle.

way that development is done.

way that development is done.

tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 

tactile surfaces, to the sounds of the engine and the various 

  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 

  Of course, aspects such as dynamic feel and inspirational 

moving parts.

moving parts.

value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 

value differ from a vehicle's physical performance and cannot 

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 

In terms of the driving experience, our work did not stop at 

be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 

be captured in numbers or figures. Our development process 

physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 

physical driving performance, but extended to "dynamic feel" 

had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 

had to use repeated road tests with prototypes to verify the 

that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-

that would stimulate drivers to notice the comfort and smooth-

finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 

finer points of the driving feel, including steering and braking 

ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 

ness of the ride, hopefully reacting with the sentiment, “I would 

response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 

response, as well as running noise and vibration, etc. There 

like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 

like to keep driving this forever.” Hence, our work on both the 

were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 

were  moments  in  the  process  when  we  were  stuck  and 

design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

design  and  the  driving  experience  pursued  a  high  level  of 

unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

unable to attain our target results, but never once did members 

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 

Subaru’s  commitment  to  automobile  manufacturing  from 

We will continue to work as a team with our 
subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and local 
partners to deliver vehicles that exceed the 
expectations of customers

When  building  our  production  facilities  in  the  U.S.,  we 
dispatched a large number of engineers to our local production 
subsidiary,  Subaru  of  Indiana  Automotive,  Inc.  (SIA),  and 
cooperated across divisions, from development, to production 
and quality control, in our efforts preparing for mass produc-
tion. Local employees were also proactive in providing ideas, 

which helped everyone work as a team to achieve high quality 
and  high  value  for  our  users.  In  addition,  expectations  were 
very high from Subaru of America Inc. (SOA), our U.S. sales 
subsidiary,  and  from  local  dealers.  During  development,  key 
persons  from  SOA  and  local  dealers  reviewed  the  design, 
were actively involved in test drives, and helped us toward the 
final product with their candid input.

This demonstrates the comprehensive and collective effort 
that  went  into  developing  the  new  Legacy/Outback,  which 
have  garnered  very  high  praise  for  their  safety  and  driving 
performance, as well as their design and overall feel. Conse-

quently, since the models debuted, strong sales numbers have 
outstripped our expectations not only in the U.S. and Japan, 
but in other parts of the world as well. To our delight, a consid-
erable  number  of  buyers  have  chosen  the  new  Legacy/Out-
back over premium European brands.

In  response  to  this  trust,  and  in  order  to  further  solidify 
Subaru’s  brand  strength  in  the  global  car  market,  we  will 
continue our quest to develop high quality vehicles that exceed 
customers’ expectations.

We strove toward the dual goals of 

environmental performance and a comfortable 

driving experience, and were able to achieve 

high fuel efficiency in an AWD vehicle

the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 

the customer's perspective is also present in our approach to 

fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-

fuel efficiency. To be sure, it is important to improve the adver-

tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 

tised catalog value for fuel efficiency, but we also emphasize 

the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 

the actual mileage that customers will attain in normal driving 

circumstances.

circumstances.

  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 

  Our  way  of  thinking  with  regard  to  an  environmentally 

conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 

conscious driving experience is not to impose restrictions on the 

driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-

driver, but rather to achieve both efficiency and comfortable drivabil-

ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 

ity. Therefore, we have adopted an AWD system in order to deliver 

safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 

safety and comfort under a wide variety of road surfaces, even 

though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 

though it is disadvantageous for fuel efficiency due to increased 

weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 

weight  and  mechanical  loss  compared  with  FWD  vehicles.  To 

compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 

compensate,  we  improved  engine  and  transmission  efficiency, 

boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 

boosted aerodynamic performance, and introduced “idling stop” 

features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 

features to achieve best-in-class results for actual fuel efficiency 

even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 

even  compared  to  FWD  vehicles.  Indeed,  customers  of  the 

new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

new  Legacy/Outback  have  approved  by  remarking,  “The  fuel 

22

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.ANNUAL REPORT 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Leveraging Production to Stand Above the Crowd

Gunma Manufacturing Division 
(Main Plant & Yajima Plant)

U.S. (SIA Plant)
U.S. (SIA Plant)

Dedicating effort toward expanding capacity 
and ensuring efficient operations to meet 
continually growing North American demand.

After the launch of new Legacy/Outback in 2014, sales of Subaru vehicles in the North American 
market jumped to a new level. In order to meet this increased demand in North America, 
we decided to move forward plans for expanding capacity at our local production subsidiary 
Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA), whose facilities will be built out to handle some 390,000 
vehicles annually by the end of 2016.

Moving into the future, we will also efficiently run our production lines, a total of five 

in the U.S. and Japan, to meet demand in the global marketplace.

Overseas

U.S. (SIA Plant)

Japan

Gunma 
Manufacturing 
Division
 (Main Plant & 
Yajima Plant)

829,000 vehicles

200,000 vehicles

850,000 vehicles

218,000 vehicles

960,000 vehicles

328,000 vehicles

66,000 vehicle increase

1,026,000 vehicles

394,000 vehicles

629,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

End of 2014

Spring 2016

End of 2016 (initial plan)

End of 2016 (revised plan)

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

23

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Leveraging Production to Stand Above the Crowd

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Leveraging Production to Stand Above the Crowd

Imperatives to consider during production

•  Following the quality management cycle
•  Aiming for zero disasters and accidents (holding a Health and Safety Kickoff Meeting 

at each business site at the beginning of each fiscal year)

•  Risk assessment activities
•  5th Voluntary Plan for the Environment (FY2012–16)
•  Primary environmental performance (amounts of CO2 emission, waste generation 

(including scrap metal sold for profit) and PRTR materials)

•  Communication with business partners (holding Purchasing Policy Briefings every 
spring; collaborating with Cooperation Meetings composed of our business partners)

Please see our CSR website for details.
•  Customers and Products (http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/envi/csr/csr/consumers/)
•  Environment (http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/envi/csr/csr/environment/environment.html)

Dedicating effort toward expanding capacity 

and ensuring efficient operations to meet 

continually growing North American demand.

After the launch of new Legacy/Outback in 2014, sales of Subaru vehicles in the North American 

market jumped to a new level. In order to meet this increased demand in North America, 

we decided to move forward plans for expanding capacity at our local production subsidiary 

Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA), whose facilities will be built out to handle some 390,000 

vehicles annually by the end of 2016.

Moving into the future, we will also efficiently run our production lines, a total of five 

in the U.S. and Japan, to meet demand in the global marketplace.

In addition to popular new models, strong sales
continue for existing models

Subaru sales in the U.S. in 2014 posted a year-on-year gain of 
21.0%,  reaching  approximately  510,000  vehicles.  In  addition 
to seeing record high unit sales for six years running, Subaru is 
the only automaker to beat previous-year U.S. results for seven 
years in a row. On top of this, sales in Canada, with approximate-
ly 42,000 vehicles (up 14.3% year on year), have  seen record 
highs for three years in a row. Proof that the Subaru brand is 
maintaining  high  approval  in  the  North  American  market  lies 
not only in the strong sales growth for Legacy/Outback—last 
year’s recipients of a full model change—but also in the steady 
sales of Impreza and Forester, which have not been revamped 
as recently.

829,000 vehicles

200,000 vehicles

850,000 vehicles

218,000 vehicles

960,000 vehicles

328,000 vehicles

66,000 vehicle increase

1,026,000 vehicles

394,000 vehicles

629,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

632,000 vehicles

End of 2014

Spring 2016

End of 2016 (initial plan)

End of 2016 (revised plan)

Bringing SIA expansion plans ahead by four years 
and building capacity for some 390,000 vehicles 
by the end of 2016

In FHI’s mid-term management vision, announced in May 2014, 
we explained plans to expand capacity at our U.S. production 
subsidiary Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA), in order to 
meet  growing  demand  in  North  America.  Originally,  we  had 
targeted  staggered  increases,  starting  from  approximately 
170,000  units  initially  and  moving  toward  310,000  in  FY2017, 
then  400,000  in  FY2021.  Increasingly  robust  North  American 
sales  buoyed  by  the  subsequent  launch  of  new  models, 
however, led us to greatly expedite plans and announce a target 
of 394,000 units by the end of 2016. Simultaneous with this 
capacity  expansion  will  be  the  shift  of  production  of  Impreza 
vehicles  for  North  America  from  Japan-based  production  to 
production on a newly built line at SIA. 
        Our  plans  for  boosting  production 
will give us, by the end of 2016, a total 
of five production lines: three in Japan 
and two at SIA. Going forward, we will 
continue  to  dedicate  effort  to  flexible 
operations  so  that  each  plant  will  be 
able to promptly handle increased sales 
of any of our models, and so that we 
can efficiently run these five production 
lines at their maximum capacity.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

24

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Leveraging Marketing to Stand Above the Crowd

Focusing on the inspirational and emotional value 
of cars supported by exceptional utility and safety

Subaru  is  esteemed  in  the  global  automobile  market  as  a 
company with distinct individuality. Part of that is our use of 
proprietary  technologies  such  as  the  horizontally-opposed 
engine and Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, which stem from our 
pursuit of stability and control under a variety of road conditions. 
Additionally, a significant Subaru characteristic is our thorough 
effort to build cars that prioritize safety from every angle, from 
primary safety (such as visibility) to collision safety. This reliability 
with regard to safety and basic driving performance had previously 
won  Subaru  acclaim  from  U.S.  customers  who  value  cars  as 
practical driving machines. 

Furthermore, results of SOA’s surveys of owner awareness 
and  behavior  have  shown  strong  trust  and  affection  from 
many  owners  toward  the  Subaru  brand  and  cars.  Survey 
results indicated that Subaru vehicles are actively utilized not 
only  in  daily  life,  but  also  as  part  of  owners’  lifestyles,  be  it 
through hobbies, sports, leisure, or other pursuits. Amidst this 
context,  SOA  started,  from  2007,  the  LOVE  Campaign  to 
showcase owners‘ enjoyment of the inspirational and emotional 
value, over and above the functions and performance, of our 
cars.  The  campaign  seeks  to  effectively  convey  Subaru’s 
characteristic individuality to a wide range of customers.

Following a marketing strategy localized for Subaru of America, 
and communicating the appeal of the Subaru brand 
from a thoroughly customer-centric standpoint

Sales of Subaru vehicles in the U.S. market have continued to grow well above the demand for 
new vehicles and Subaru has continued to increase its brand presence since 2008. One of the 
approaches that played a key role in enabling this rapid progress in the U.S. was the LOVE Campaign, 
a marketing strategy started in 2007 by local subsidiary Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA).

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

25

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY

Leveraging Marketing to Stand Above the Crowd

Special Feature: PROMINENCE BY LEGACY
Leveraging Marketing to Stand Above the Crowd

SOA Initiatives

•  Strengthening customer service through telephone support 

and through the website.

Please see our CSR website for details.
• Customers and Products (http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/envi/csr/csr/consumers/)

Following a marketing strategy localized for Subaru of America, 

and communicating the appeal of the Subaru brand 

from a thoroughly customer-centric standpoint

Sales of Subaru vehicles in the U.S. market have continued to grow well above the demand for 

new vehicles and Subaru has continued to increase its brand presence since 2008. One of the 

approaches that played a key role in enabling this rapid progress in the U.S. was the LOVE Campaign, 

a marketing strategy started in 2007 by local subsidiary Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA).

Focusing on the inspirational and emotional value 

of cars supported by exceptional utility and safety

Subaru  is  esteemed  in  the  global  automobile  market  as  a 

company with distinct individuality. Part of that is our use of 

proprietary  technologies  such  as  the  horizontally-opposed 

engine and Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, which stem from our 

pursuit of stability and control under a variety of road conditions. 

Additionally, a significant Subaru characteristic is our thorough 

effort to build cars that prioritize safety from every angle, from 

primary safety (such as visibility) to collision safety. This reliability 

with regard to safety and basic driving performance had previously 

won  Subaru  acclaim  from  U.S.  customers  who  value  cars  as 

practical driving machines. 

Furthermore, results of SOA’s surveys of owner awareness 

and  behavior  have  shown  strong  trust  and  affection  from 

many  owners  toward  the  Subaru  brand  and  cars.  Survey 

results indicated that Subaru vehicles are actively utilized not 

only  in  daily  life,  but  also  as  part  of  owners’  lifestyles,  be  it 

through hobbies, sports, leisure, or other pursuits. Amidst this 

context,  SOA  started,  from  2007,  the  LOVE  Campaign  to 

showcase owners‘ enjoyment of the inspirational and emotional 

value, over and above the functions and performance, of our 

cars.  The  campaign  seeks  to  effectively  convey  Subaru’s 

characteristic individuality to a wide range of customers.

Marketing a fulfilling lifestyle achieved 
by driving a Subaru

Prior to 2007, Subaru advertising in the U.S. had been short-term 
in focus, targeting groups of prospective buyers by showing the 
specific  functions  and  performance  of  each  model—such  as 
price or fuel economy. Consequently, the overall brand image 
was vague and market awareness of Subaru idled at a low level. 
To address this, the LOVE Campaign chose a unique marketing 
strategy to express the brand value from an owner's standpoint, 
including  the  owner‘s  trust  and  love  of  their  Subaru  and  the 
fulfilling  lifestyle  they  are  able  to  create  with  their  family 
because they drive a Subaru.

The campaign struck a chord with U.S. buyers and successfully 
expanded  the  customer  demographic  of  the  Subaru  brand. 
Furthermore, the revolutionary EyeSight advanced driving support 
system  made  its  debut,  while  at  the  same  time  all  Subaru 
models garnered the highest approval ratings from U.S. safety 
agencies.  These  awards  allowed  us  to  further  prove  the  high 
level  of  safety  that  underscores  owners’  “love  for  Subaru,” 
boosting the campaign’s persuasiveness in the process.

Devoting effort to social contribution activities 
while aiming to be the most loved company in 
local communities

As  part  of  the  LOVE  Campaign,  SOA  inaugurated  “Share  the 
Love,” a program through which $250 is donated to a charitable 
organization for each Subaru vehicle sold. The program was very 

well received by customers, with many voicing opinions such as, 
“I am glad that I can support society by purchasing a Subaru.”

Furthermore,  SOA  is  currently  rolling  out  a  project  called 
“The Subaru Love Promise,” and is being run in collaboration 
with  dealers  all  across  the  U.S.  Specifically,  The  Subaru  Love 
Promise is a variety of initiatives to contribute to local communi-
ties and societies through activities and charitable causes such 
as  environmental  conservation,  education,  animal  protection, 
and similar activities.

VOICE

Through these types of activities, SOA and Subaru dealers 
in  each  part  of  the  U.S.  hope  to  become  objects  of  trust  and 
love  in  the  eyes  of  owners  and  local  communities,  much  the 
same as the Subaru brand and cars. To that end, we are striving 
to  further  increase  the  number  of  devotees  to  vehicles  under 
the Subaru brand, while also helping each dealer grow toward 
being No. 1 in their region.

Providing cars that precisely reflect market demands, 
while continuing to build relationships of long-term trust with customers

Subaru  has  won  trust  from  its  customers  by  continuing  to  provide 
vehicles to the U.S. market with superior quality and the industry’s 
most advanced safety features. Additionally, by becoming a partner in 
the  active  lifestyles  of  owners,  including  responding  to  diverse 
customer demands such as “wanting to safely navigate snowy roads” 
and  “wanting  to  enjoy  long-distance  family  road  trips,”  the  Subaru 
brand has come to enjoy devotion and love from its owners.
  Of  course,  it  is  indispensable  to  introduce  models  that  deftly 
perceive  the  needs  of  the  marketplace  in  order  to  keep  customers 
choosing Subaru. This is why the Subaru models in our current lineup 
are all situated in growth segments of the U.S. marketplace and reflect 
customer demands in terms of size, price point, etc. We are proud to 
declare that our success today in the U.S. is the result of collaboration 

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

26

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

utilizing  Fuji  Heavy  Industries’  advanced  technological  development 
plus SOA’s market analysis and marketing acumen.
  Going forward, we will continue to build long-term relationships of 
trust with owners by providing them with special experiences that are 
part of what make a Subaru a Subaru.

Thomas J. Doll
President
Chief Operating Officer

 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance System

for the selection of corporate officer candidates, and the Execu-

take various measures to further strengthen internal control, 

tive Compensation Meeting is responsible for evaluating the 

and will also disclose information fairly and in a timely manner 

performance and determining the compensation of executives. 

in order to increase management transparency.

Also, the execution of important business operations is 

decided and supervised by the board of directors and audited 

Since  June  1999,  FHI  has  employed  an  executive  officer 

by  the  board  of  corporate  auditors.  The  board  of  directors 

Internal Controls System

system that clarifies the managerial responsibilities of execu-

consists of eight members with two of them invited from the 

tives in each division. In June 2003, we reduced the term of 

outside  as  independent  members  to  enhance  governance. 

Internal controls are an indispensable mechanism for achieving 

directors and executive officers from two years to one. More-

The  board  of  corporate  auditors  consists  of  four  members 

corporate  objectives,  and  management  is  responsible  for 

over, since June 2004, based on a decision of the Board of 

with three of them invited from the outside for higher objec-

establishing  them  and  maintaining  their  effectiveness  and 

Directors, the Executive Nomination Meeting is responsible 

tivity to monitor business management. In addition, we will 

efficiency. At FHI, the Corporate Planning Department (which 

System of Corporate Governance

General Meeting of Shareholders

Board of Corporate Auditors Meeting
4 Auditors
(Incl. 3 Outside Corporate Auditors)

Accounting Auditors

Committees

Board of Directors Meeting
8 Directors (Incl.2 Outside Directors)

Executive Compensation Meeting

plays  a  central  role  in  the  common  functions  of  each  busi-

ness) and other company-wide departments maintain close 

links with other departments and companies to enhance risk 

management. 

In  addition,  the  Audit  Department  performs  planned 

Executive Nomination Meeting

audits of each department and Group company. To support 

internal controls, FHI has created a system and organization to 

ensure compliance, which is the foundation of risk manage-

ment. Further, in compliance with the Standards for Manage-

ment  Assessment  and  Audit  Concerning  Internal  Control 

Over Financial Reporting issued by the Business Accounting 

Internal Audit Department
(Audit Department)

President / Representative Directors

CSR Committee

Deliberation  Council  of  the  Financial  Services  Agency  on 

February 15, 2007, we work to continuously strengthen the 

Environmental Committee

internal controls system of the entire Group so as to achieve 

Compliance Committee

the following:

1. Effective and efficient operations

2. Reliable financial reporting

Executive Management Board Meeting

Recall Committee

3. Compliance with laws and regulations in all business 

Corporate Vice Presidents

Export Control Committee

    activities

4. Safeguarding of assets

Corporate Operations at HQ, Automotive BU, Each Company and Affiliate of the Group

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

27

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
Corporate Governance

Executive Compensation

Risk Management

Location-Specific Business Continuity Plans (BCPs)

As  approved  by  the  Ordinary  General  Meeting  of  Share-

We define risk as uncertain elements with the potential for 

With  the  goal  of  minimizing  any  reduction  of  service  to 

holders in June 2006, the total amount of yearly compensa-

negative impact on our business operations. While there are 

customers and preventing loss of market share and corpo-

tion paid to directors and corporate auditors is limited to ¥600 

many  types  of  risk,  we  call  those  risks  that  are  particularly 

rate value, we have created a BCP for each business unit to 

million and ¥100 million, respectively. The compensation paid 

dangerous  to  our  business  operations  and  that  we  cannot 

maintain business operations or restore them as quickly as 

to directors must be approved by the Board of Directors and 

handle through regular decision-making channels “crisis-level 

possible in the event of an emergency. Should our resources 

is divided into a fixed amount (based on position, the  busi-

risks” and categorize them as follows: natural disaster, acci-

(employees, physical assets, monetary assets) be affected 

ness environment, and other factors) and a performance-

dent, internal human factors, external human factors, social 

by an emergency, we will leverage our remaining resources 

based amount (based on consolidated ordinary income for 

factors  (domestic,  overseas),  and  compliance.  We  have 

to minimize the shutdown of priority operations and restore 

the fiscal year under review, the business environment, and 

created manuals for dealing with each type of emergency, 

all operations to their original state as quickly as possible. 

other factors). In fiscal 2015, compensation for directors and 

which  delineate  what  communication  channels  are  to  be 

We have also established an Emergency Response Policy, 

corporate auditors was as follows:

used once a risk is recognized, how to form crisis manage-

in accordance with which we strive to maintain operations 

Total compensation (millions of yen)

optimally to the situation.

ment headquarters, and other methods to follow to respond 

in the event of an emergency.

Classification

Number

Basic compensation

Directors
(excluding outside directors)

Corporate auditors
(excluding outside corporate auditors)

Outside executive officers

7

2

3

Fixed
amount

241

30

44

Performance-
based amount

229

470

−

−

30

44

Total

Note: 

12

315

229

544

This table includes one corporate auditor who retired by the end of the fiscal year. 
As of March 31, 2015, the Company maintains seven directors (including one outside 
director) and four corporate auditors (including two outside corporate auditors).

Emergency Response Policy

1  Give first priority to people’s survival and physical safety.

2  Minimize loss of stakeholder interests and corporate 

value.

3  Act always with honesty, fairness, and transparency, 

even in an emergency.

FHI emergency response procedure manual and crisis 
management (disaster prevention) guidelines

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

28

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Board Directors / Executive Officers

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

29

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Board Directors / Executive Officers

Directors of the Board

Yasuyuki Yoshinaga 1
Representative Director of the Board
President & CEO
April 1977   Joined the Company
April 2005   Corporate Vice President, Senior General Manager of Strategy Development  
Division, and General Manager of Corporate Planning Department

June 2006   Corporate Vice President and Chief General Manager of Strategy Development Division
April 2007   Corporate Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru Japan Sales &  

Marketing Division, and General Manager of Sales Promotion Department

June 2007   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Japan  

Sales & Marketing Division

June 2009   Director of the Board and Corporate Executive Vice President
June 2011   Representative Director of the Board, President & CEO

2

Jun Kondo
Representative Director of the Board
Deputy President
April 1976   Joined the Company
June 2003   Corporate Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru Manufacturing  

Division, and Chief General Manager of Gunma Plant

May 2004   Corporate Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru Cost Planning &  

Management Division, and General Manager of Cost Planning Department

June 2004   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Cost  

Planning & Management Division

June 2006   Corporate Senior Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru Cost Planning &  

Management Division, and Senior General Manager of Subaru Purchasing Division
April 2007   Corporate Senior Vice President, Chief General Manager of Strategy Development  
Division, and Chief General Manager of Subaru Cost Planning & Management Division

June 2008   Director of the Board and Corporate Executive Vice President
June 2011   Representative Director of the Board and Deputy President

3

Naoto Muto
Director of the Board
Corporate Executive Vice President
April 1977   Joined the Company
April 2005   Corporate Vice President, Senior General Manager of Subaru Product & Portfolio  

Planning Division, and General Manager of Subaru Product & Portfolio Planning Division
June 2006   Corporate Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Product & Portfolio  

Planning Division

June 2007   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Product &  

Portfolio Planning Division

April 2009   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Purchasing Division
June 2010   Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru Purchasing  

Division

June 2011   Director of the Board and Corporate Executive Vice President

4

Mitsuru Takahashi
Director of the Board
Corporate Executive Vice President
April 1978   Joined the Company
June 2006   Corporate Vice President and General Manager of Finance & Accounting Department
April 2009   Corporate Senior Vice President, CFO, and General Manager of Finance & Accounting  

Department

April 2010   Corporate Senior Vice President, CFO, General Manager of Finance & Accounting  

Department, and President of Eco Technologies Company

June 2010   Corporate Executive Vice President, CFO, General Manager of Finance & Accounting  

Department, and. President of Eco Technologies Company

April 2011   Corporate Executive Vice President, CFO, and President of Eco Technologies Company
June 2012   Director of the Board, Corporate Executive Vice President, CFO, and President

Executive Officers

Outside Directors

The Company has appointed Toshio 
Arima to the position of outside director. 
Possessing considerable experience as an 
executive and a high degree of expertise 
in the area of CSR, Mr. Arima offers sound 
advice to and ensures the independent 
monitoring of the Board of Directors and 
other bodies. The Company has appointed 
Nobushige Imai to the position of outside 
auditor. Mr. Imai is fully qualified for this po-
sition owing to the wealth of management 
experience and knowledge he acquired as 
an executive in the financial industry, and 
he has the character and ability needed to 
undertake audits in an objective manner. 
In addition, the Company has appointed 
Takatoshi Yamamoto to the position of 
outside auditor. Mr. Yamamoto is fully quali-
fied for this position owing to the wealth of 
knowledge of corporate activities he gained 
as a securities analyst and the corporate 
management experience he gained as an 
executive in the manufacturing industry. 
Further, since they possess exemplary 
backgrounds and no conflict with the 
interests of ordinary shareholders can be 
foreseen, the Company has appointed Mr. 
Arima and Mr. Yamamoto as independent 
directors under Tokyo Stock Exchange 
(TSE) regulations.

Corporate Executive Vice President
Shuzo Haimoto 
Hisashi Nagano
Nobuhiko Murakami

Corporate Senior Vice President
Yasuo Kosakai 
Tomomi Nakamura
Kazuo Hosoya 
Masaki Okawara
Yasunobu Nogai
Satoshi Maeda
Toshiaki Okada

Corporate Vice President
Masashi Takahashi 
Masami Iida
Hiromi Tsutsumi
Shoichiro Tozuka 
Toshiaki Tamegai
Hiroki Kurihara
Tetsuo Onuki
Yoichi Katou
Masayuki Uchida
Takuji Dai
Fumiaki Hayata

Auditors

Standing Corporate Auditor
Akira Mabuchi
Nobushige Imai

Corporate Auditor
Takatoshi Yamamoto
Shinichi Mita

5

Takeshi Tachimori
Director of the Board
Corporate Executive Vice President
April 1977   Joined the Company
June 2006   Corporate Vice President and Senior General Manager of Subaru Product &  

Portfolio Planning Division

April 2009   Corporate Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru Product &    

Portfolio Planning Division, and President of Subaru Tecnica International Inc.

April 2010   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief General Manager of Subaru   

Product & Portfolio Planning Division

April 2011   Corporate Senior Vice President and Chairman, President & CEO of Subaru of  

America, Inc.

June 2011   Corporate Senior Vice President; Chairman, President & CEO of Subaru of  

America, Inc.; and Chief General Manager of Subaru Overseas Sales &   
Marketing Division 1

April 2013   Corporate Executive Vice President, Chairman & CEO of Subaru of America,  

Inc., and Chief General Manager of Subaru Overseas Sales & Marketing  
Division 1

June 2013   Director of the Board and Corporate Executive Vice President

6

Masahiro Kasai
Director of the Board
Corporate Executive Vice President
April 1978   Joined the Company
June 2007   Corporate Vice President and President & CEO of Subaru of Indiana  

Automotive, Inc.

April 2009   Corporate Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru  

Manufacturing Division, and Chief General Manager of Gunma Plant
April 2010   Corporate Senior Vice President, Chief General Manager of Subaru  
Manufacturing Division, and Chief General Manager of Gunma Plant
April 2014   Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief General Manager of  

Subaru Purchasing Division

June 2015   Director of the Board and Corporate Executive Vice President

Toshio Arima
Outside Director
June 2011  Outside Director

7

Yoshinori Komamura

8

Outside Director
June 2015  Outside Director

7

5

3

1

6

2

8

4

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

30

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Ten-Year Financial Summary 

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES  Years ended March 31

(Millions of yen) 

(Thousands of U.S. dollars1)

Consolidated Automobile Sales by Region

(Number of units)

Consolidated Automobile Sales

(Number of units)

For the year:

  Net sales

  Cost of sales

  Gross profit

  Selling, general and administrative expenses

  Operating income (loss)

  Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests

  Net income (loss)

  Comprehensive income

At year-end:

  Net assets2

  Shareholders’ equity

  Total assets

  Ratio of shareholders’ equity to total assets (%)

Per share: (in yen and U.S. dollars)

  Net income (loss):

    Basic

    Diluted

  Net assets

Other information:

  Depreciation/amortization

  Capital expenditures (addition to fixed assets)

  Research and development expenses

  Number of shares issued (thousands of shares)3

  Number of shareholders3

  Number of employees3

    Parent only

    Consolidated

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

¥

1,476,368
1,125,293
351,075
292,736
58,339
28,674
15,611
—

¥

1,494,817
1,142,674
352,143
304,237
47,906
45,589
31,899
—

¥

1,572,346
1,217,662
354,684
309,004
45,680
31,906
18,481
—

¥

1,445,790
1,164,564
281,226
287,029
(5,803)
(21,517)
(69,933)

—

¥

1,428,690
1,152,763
275,927
248,577
27,350
(443)
(16,450)
(13,416)

¥

1,580,563
1,241,427
339,136
255,001
84,135
63,214
50,326
34,900

¥

1,517,105
1,222,419
294,686
250,727
43,959
52,879
38,453
44,474

¥

1,912,968
1,501,809
411,159
290,748
120,411
93,082
119,588
152,009

¥

2,408,129
1,728,271
679,858
353,369
326,489
328,865
206,616
210,757

¥

2,877,913
2,017,490
860,423
437,378
423,045
392,206
261,873
309,271

$

23,928,769
16,774,674
7,154,095
3,636,634
3,517,461
3,261,046
2,177,376
2,571,473

¥

467,786
465,522
1,348,400
34.5%

¥

495,703
494,004
1,316,041
37.5%

¥

494,423
493,397
1,296,388
38.1%

¥

394,719
393,946
1,165,431
33.8%

¥

381,893
380,587
1,231,367
30.9%

¥

413,963
412,661
1,188,324
34.7%

¥

451,607
450,302
1,352,532
33.3%

¥

596,813
595,365
1,577,454
37.7%

¥

770,071
765,544
1,888,363
40.5%

¥

1,030,719
1,022,417
2,199,714
46.5%

$

8,570,042
8,501,104
18,289,798

¥

¥

 20.66
20.66
649.41

80,073
119,289
46,893
782,865
46,367

11,998
26,115

¥

¥

44.46
44.44
687.81

81,454
126,329
50,709
782,865
42,920

11,752
25,598

¥

¥

25.73
25.73
687.02

87,164
118,869
52,020
782,865
44,484

11,909
26,404

¥

¥

¥

¥

(91.97)
—
505.59

74,036
95,153
42,831
782,865
40,839

12,137
27,659

(21.11)
—
488.58

65,785
89,077
37,175
782,865
39,223

12,483
27,586

¥

¥

64.56
—
528.88

56,062
67,378
42,907
782,865
34,240

12,429
27,296

¥

¥

49.27
—
576.97

58,611
67,035
48,115
782,865
33,139

12,359
27,123

¥

¥

153.23
 —
762.87

61,544
94,986
49,141
782,865
28,890

12,717
27,509

¥

¥

264.76
—
980.98

61,486
98,537
60,092
782,865
51,386

13,034
28,545

¥

¥

335.57
—
1,310.15

71,821
135,346
83,535
782,865
70,942

13,883
29,774

$

$

2.79
—
10.89

597,165
1,125,351
694,562

1. U.S. dollar figures have been translated from yen, for convenience only, at the rate of ¥120.27 to US$1.00, the approximate rate of exchange at March 31, 2015.
2. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
3. As of March 31

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

31

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

United States

Canada

Russia

Europe 

Australia 

Japan

China

Others

1,000,000

910,695

825,098

724,466

656,964 639,862

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Overseas units by region:

Consolidated Automobile Sales by Model (Number of units)

Impreza

Tribeca

Others

Forester

Exiga

Minicars

Levorg

SUBARU BRZ

910,695

825,098

724,466

656,964 639,862

Overseas units by model:

Domestic units:

  Legacy

  Impreza

  Forester

  Levorg

  WRX

  Exiga

  OEM

  Others

  SUBARU BRZ

Passenger cars

Minicars

Domestic total

  U.S.

  Canada

  Russia

  Europe

  Australia

  China

  Others

Overseas total

  Legacy

  Impreza

  Forester

  WRX

  Tribeca

  OEM

  Others

  SUBARU BRZ

Overseas total

Grand total

2011

22,673

20,184

12,685

0

0

0

7,859

4,430

303

68,134

89,971

158,105

278,959

28,059

11,320

48,244

41,150

62,412

28,715

498,859

225,388

87,066

176,453

5,643

0

0

3,865

444

498,859

656,964

2012

22,812

29,122

13,803

0

0

8,020

249

5,844

303

80,153

92,189

172,342

280,356

28,239

15,860

39,075

36,928

48,323

18,739

467,520

210,194

90,149

157,833

0

5,702

38

3,372

232

467,520

639,862

2013

24,207

53,250

18,044

0

0

7,392

6,711

2,778

368

112,750

50,372

163,122

357,569

32,644

14,719

46,382

38,120

50,185

21,725

561,344

207,460

190,864

147,679

0

4,243

10,100

591

407

561,344

724,466

2014

18,961

61,071

36,572

0

0

3,853

3,380

1,857

453

126,147

55,454

181,601

441,799

36,013

15,314

31,756

39,515

44,807

34,293

643,497

182,712

210,828

231,173

0

2,561

15,822

256

145

643,497

825,098

2015

13,845

39,462

21,103

40,559

7,514

1,937

1,890

1,127

439

127,876

34,876

162,752

527,630

42,439

11,559

35,730

38,889

53,821

37,875

747,943

235,791

196,403

269,649

37,982

64

7,914

135

5

747,943

910,695

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

Legacy

WRX

OEM

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

Five-Year Automobile Sales  Years ended March 31

(Millions of yen) 

(Thousands of U.S. dollars1)

Consolidated Automobile Sales by Region

(Number of units)

Consolidated Automobile Sales

(Number of units)

  Selling, general and administrative expenses

  Operating income (loss)

  Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests

For the year:

  Net sales

  Cost of sales

  Gross profit

  Net income (loss)

  Comprehensive income

At year-end:

  Net assets2

  Shareholders’ equity

  Total assets

Per share: (in yen and U.S. dollars)

  Net income (loss):

    Basic

    Diluted

  Net assets

Other information:

  Depreciation/amortization

  Capital expenditures (addition to fixed assets)

  Research and development expenses

  Number of shares issued (thousands of shares)3

  Number of shareholders3

  Number of employees3

    Parent only

    Consolidated

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2015

¥

1,476,368

¥

1,494,817

¥

1,572,346

¥

1,445,790

¥

1,428,690

¥

1,580,563

¥

1,517,105

¥

1,912,968

¥

2,408,129

¥

2,877,913

$

23,928,769

1,125,293

1,142,674

1,217,662

1,164,564

1,152,763

1,241,427

1,222,419

1,501,809

1,728,271

2,017,490

16,774,674

351,075

292,736

58,339

28,674

15,611

—

352,143

304,237

47,906

45,589

31,899

—

354,684

309,004

45,680

31,906

18,481

—

281,226

287,029

(5,803)

(21,517)

(69,933)

—

275,927

248,577

27,350

(443)

(16,450)

(13,416)

339,136

255,001

84,135

63,214

50,326

34,900

294,686

250,727

43,959

52,879

38,453

44,474

411,159

290,748

120,411

93,082

119,588

152,009

679,858

353,369

326,489

328,865

206,616

210,757

860,423

437,378

423,045

392,206

261,873

309,271

7,154,095

3,636,634

3,517,461

3,261,046

2,177,376

2,571,473

  Ratio of shareholders’ equity to total assets (%)

34.5%

37.5%

38.1%

33.8%

30.9%

34.7%

33.3%

37.7%

40.5%

¥

467,786

¥

495,703

¥

494,423

¥

394,719

¥

381,893

¥

413,963

¥

451,607

¥

596,813

¥

770,071

¥

1,030,719

$

8,570,042

465,522

494,004

493,397

393,946

380,587

412,661

450,302

595,365

765,544

1,348,400

1,316,041

1,296,388

1,165,431

1,231,367

1,188,324

1,352,532

1,577,454

1,888,363

1,022,417

2,199,714

46.5%

8,501,104

18,289,798

¥

¥

¥

¥

(91.97)

¥

(21.11)

¥

64.56

¥

49.27

¥

153.23

¥

264.76

¥

335.57

$

—

505.59

—

488.58

—

528.88

—

576.97

 —

762.87

—

—

980.98

1,310.15

 20.66

20.66

649.41

44.46

44.44

687.81

25.73

25.73

687.02

¥

80,073

¥

81,454

¥

87,164

¥

¥

¥

¥

¥

¥

¥

71,821

$

597,165

119,289

46,893

782,865

46,367

11,998

26,115

126,329

50,709

782,865

42,920

11,752

25,598

118,869

52,020

782,865

44,484

11,909

26,404

74,036

95,153

42,831

782,865

40,839

12,137

27,659

65,785

89,077

37,175

782,865

39,223

12,483

27,586

56,062

67,378

42,907

782,865

34,240

12,429

27,296

58,611

67,035

48,115

782,865

33,139

12,359

27,123

61,544

94,986

49,141

782,865

28,890

12,717

27,509

61,486

98,537

60,092

782,865

51,386

13,034

28,545

135,346

83,535

782,865

70,942

13,883

29,774

2.79

—

10.89

1,125,351

694,562

1. U.S. dollar figures have been translated from yen, for convenience only, at the rate of ¥120.27 to US$1.00, the approximate rate of exchange at March 31, 2015.

2. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

3. As of March 31

Japan
China

United States
Others

1,000,000

Canada

Russia

Europe 

Australia 

910,695

825,098

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

724,466

656,964 639,862

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Consolidated Automobile Sales by Model (Number of units)

Legacy
WRX
OEM

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

Impreza
Tribeca
Others

Forester
Exiga
Minicars

Levorg
SUBARU BRZ

910,695

825,098

724,466

656,964 639,862

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Domestic units:
  Legacy
  Impreza
  Forester
  Levorg
  WRX
  Exiga
  SUBARU BRZ
  OEM
  Others
Passenger cars
Minicars
Domestic total

Overseas units by region:
  U.S.
  Canada
  Russia
  Europe
  Australia
  China
  Others
Overseas total

Overseas units by model:
  Legacy
  Impreza
  Forester
  WRX
  Tribeca
  SUBARU BRZ
  OEM
  Others
Overseas total
Grand total

22,673
20,184
12,685
0
0
7,859
0
4,430
303
68,134
89,971
158,105

278,959
28,059
11,320
48,244
41,150
62,412
28,715
498,859

225,388
87,066
176,453
0
5,643
0
3,865
444
498,859
656,964

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

32

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

22,812
29,122
13,803
0
0
8,020
249
5,844
303
80,153
92,189
172,342

280,356
28,239
15,860
39,075
36,928
48,323
18,739
467,520

210,194
90,149
157,833
0
5,702
38
3,372
232
467,520
639,862

24,207
53,250
18,044
0
0
7,392
6,711
2,778
368
112,750
50,372
163,122

357,569
32,644
14,719
46,382
38,120
50,185
21,725
561,344

207,460
190,864
147,679
0
4,243
10,100
591
407
561,344
724,466

18,961
61,071
36,572
0
0
3,853
3,380
1,857
453
126,147
55,454
181,601

441,799
36,013
15,314
31,756
39,515
44,807
34,293
643,497

182,712
210,828
231,173
0
2,561
15,822
256
145
643,497
825,098

13,845
39,462
21,103
40,559
7,514
1,937
1,890
1,127
439
127,876
34,876
162,752

527,630
42,439
11,559
35,730
38,889
53,821
37,875
747,943

235,791
196,403
269,649
37,982
64
7,914
135
5
747,943
910,695

Non-consolidated Automobile Sales 

(Number of units)

Non-consolidated Domestic Automobile Sales by Model

(Number of units)

Domestic units:
  Legacy
  Impreza
  Forester
  Levorg
  WRX
  Exiga
  SUBARU BRZ
  OEM
Passenger cars
Minicars
Domestic total

Export units:
  Legacy
  Impreza
  Forester
  WRX
  Tribeca
  Exiga
  SUBARU BRZ
  OEM
  Others
Export total

U.S. retail sales1
  Legacy
  Impreza
  Forester
  WRX
  Tribeca
  SUBARU BRZ
U.S. total

CKD 2 overseas 
  (SIA portion)

SIA production units 3
  Legacy
  Tribeca

2011

23,212
20,859
13,160
0
0
8,150
0
5,313
70,694
92,752
163,446

67,926
83,921
174,541
0
0
374
0
3,865
70
330,697

131,873
44,395
85,080
0
2,472
0
263,820

163,469
163,469

159,215
5,558

2012

23,968
30,566
13,990
0
0
8,477
585
5,993
83,579
96,457
180,036

48,304
100,350
162,199
0
331
232
211
3,372
0
314,999

146,806
41,196
76,196
0
2,791
0
266,989

175,256
175,256

164,968
5,661

2013

25,424
54,306
18,951
0
0
7,845
6,850
2,953
116,329
50,381
166,710

30,559
198,232
142,745
0
222
407
11,542
316
0
384,023

164,680
89,195
76,347
0
2,075
4,144
336,441

185,757
183,729

177,471
3,713

2014

19,272
62,519
37,124
0
0
3,869
3,334
1,944
128,062
57,779
185,841

22,817
206,022
247,362
7,644
0
145
15,118
86
0
499,194

160,340
130,567
123,591
0
1,598
8,587
424,683

165,554
159,266

161,204
2,307

2015

14,734
40,277
21,569
41,832
7,991
2,016
1,941
1,224
131,584
35,563
167,147

34,344
199,770
265,072
37,865
0
5
8,418
135
0
545,609

191,060
128,952
159,953
25,492
732
7,504
513,693

222,513
218,565

206,681
0

Legacy
Exiga

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

Impreza
SUBARU BRZ

Forester
OEM

Levorg
Minicars

WRX

180,036

185,841

163,446

166,710

167,147

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Non-consolidated Automobile Export Units by Model

(Number of units)

Legacy
Exiga

Impreza
SUBARU BRZ

Forester
OEM

WRX
Others 

Tribeca
CKD Overseas

545,609

499,194

600,000

450,000

300,000

384,023

330,697 314,999

150,000

163,469

175,256

185,757

165,554

222,513

1. U.S. Retail Sales are the aggregate figures for the calendar year from January through December.
2. Completely Knocked Down
3. SIA Production Units are the aggregate figures for the calendar year from January through December until 2009.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

33

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Non-consolidated Automobile Sales 

(Number of units)

Domestic units:

  Legacy

  Impreza

  Forester

  Levorg

  WRX

  Exiga

  SUBARU BRZ

  OEM

Passenger cars

Minicars

Domestic total

Export units:

  Legacy

  Impreza

  Forester

  WRX

  Tribeca

  Exiga

  SUBARU BRZ

  OEM

  Others

Export total

U.S. retail sales1

  Legacy

  Impreza

  Forester

  WRX

  Tribeca

  SUBARU BRZ

U.S. total

CKD 2 overseas 

  (SIA portion)

SIA production units 3

  Legacy

  Tribeca

2011

23,212

20,859

13,160

0

0

0

8,150

5,313

70,694

92,752

163,446

67,926

83,921

174,541

0

0

0

374

3,865

70

330,697

131,873

44,395

85,080

2,472

0

0

263,820

163,469

163,469

159,215

5,558

2012

23,968

30,566

13,990

0

0

8,477

585

5,993

83,579

96,457

180,036

48,304

100,350

162,199

0

331

232

211

3,372

0

314,999

146,806

41,196

76,196

2,791

0

0

266,989

175,256

175,256

164,968

5,661

2013

25,424

54,306

18,951

0

0

7,845

6,850

2,953

116,329

50,381

166,710

30,559

198,232

142,745

0

222

407

316

0

11,542

384,023

164,680

89,195

76,347

0

2,075

4,144

336,441

185,757

183,729

177,471

3,713

2014

19,272

62,519

37,124

0

0

3,869

3,334

1,944

128,062

57,779

185,841

22,817

206,022

247,362

7,644

15,118

0

145

86

0

499,194

160,340

130,567

123,591

0

1,598

8,587

424,683

165,554

159,266

161,204

2,307

2015

14,734

40,277

21,569

41,832

7,991

2,016

1,941

1,224

131,584

35,563

167,147

34,344

199,770

265,072

37,865

0

5

0

8,418

135

545,609

191,060

128,952

159,953

25,492

732

7,504

513,693

222,513

218,565

206,681

0

Legacy

Exiga

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

600,000

450,000

300,000

Non-consolidated Domestic Automobile Sales by Model

(Number of units)

Impreza

SUBARU BRZ

Forester

OEM

Levorg

Minicars

WRX

180,036

185,841

163,446

166,710

167,147

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Non-consolidated Automobile Export Units by Model

(Number of units)

Legacy

Exiga

Impreza

SUBARU BRZ

Forester

OEM

WRX

Others 

Tribeca

CKD Overseas

545,609

499,194

384,023

330,697 314,999

150,000

163,469

175,256

185,757

165,554

222,513

1. U.S. Retail Sales are the aggregate figures for the calendar year from January through December.

2. Completely Knocked Down

3. SIA Production Units are the aggregate figures for the calendar year from January through December until 2009.

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Position

The Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. Group
The  Fuji  Heavy  Industries  Ltd.  Group  ("the  Group")  is 
engaged in activities conducted under four business divi-
sions: Automobiles (the Group’s core operating domain, 
which accounts for over 90% of consolidated net sales), 
Aerospace, Industrial Products, and Other.

On a consolidated settlement of accounts basis, FHI 
("the Company") and 77 subsidiaries, as well as 2 equity-
method affiliated companies, were included in the scope 
of the FHI Group’s consolidation as of March 31, 2015, the 
end of the fiscal year under review.

Overview

Business Environment
During the fiscal year under review, the economy in Japan 
displayed  signs  of  a  modest  recovery  mainly  shown 
in  improved  corporate  profits,  despite  the  effects  of 
an  increase  in  the  consumption  tax  rate.  In  the  global 
economy, although there was evidence of a loss of growth 
momentum  in  Europe,  China,  and  in  emerging  markets, 
there was a moderate but steady recovery driven by the 
favorable U.S. economy.

The  Group  formulated  its  mid-term  management 
vision in May of last year. The FY2015-FY2021 vision, 
“Prominence 2020,” has a growth strategy that places 
our Subaru Automobiles Division at the core as we move 
forward with initiatives specifically focused on enhancing 
the Subaru brand and building a strong business structure.
In the fiscal year under review, annual unit sales of 
Subaru  vehicles  reached  a  new  record,  with  the  United 
States,  our  most  important  market,  continuing  to  lead 
global  sales.  In  addition,  Group  efforts  steadily  bore 
fruit as Forester sales remained strong and new models 
were  launched  for  Legacy,  Outback,  Levorg,  and  WRX. 

Vehicles with version 3 of EyeSight garnered approval—
a further step in the evolution of our preventative safety 
and driving assistance features. We also worked to expand 
and enhance capacity at complete vehicle assembly plants 
inside and outside Japan in order to relieve the backlog of 
customers waiting for a vehicle.

Performance Review
In  light  of  the  above  factors,  the  FHI  Group  recorded 
historically high levels of consolidated net sales as well as 
all income categories for the third consecutive fiscal year. 
Major consolidated performance figures were as follows.
Net sales amounted to ¥2,877.9 billion, up ¥469.8 
billion, or 19.5%, year on year, owing to such factors as higher 
unit sales in our core Automobiles Division and increased 
net sales accompanying exchange rate fluctuations.

In  terms  of  profitability,  operating  income  followed 
increased net sales, coming to ¥423.0 billion, an increase of 
¥96.6 billion, or 29.6%, compared with the previous fiscal 
year,  while  net  income  was  up  ¥55.3  billion,  or  26.7%, 
from the previous fiscal year, to ¥261.9 billion.

Cost of Sales, Expenses and Operating Income

Operating Income
Operating income, as mentioned above, came to ¥423.0 
billion, an increase of ¥96.6 billion, or 29.6%.

Revenue decreasing factors, namely a ¥66.6 billion 
increase in SG&A expenses and a ¥23.2 billion increase 
in R&D expenses, were greatly outweighed by revenue 
increasing factors, mostly ¥103.7 billion in exchange rate 
differences,  a  ¥70.3  billion  improvement  in  sales  mix, 
and ¥12.4 billion in progress on cost reduction. Conse-
quently,  operating  margin  was  able  to  achieve  a  high 
level at 14.7%.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

34

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Net Sales  (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2,877.9

2,408.1

1,913.0

1,580.6

1,517.1

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Operating Income (Loss) / Net Income (Loss)  (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

Operating Income (Loss) 

Net Income (Loss)

500

400

300

200

423.0

326.5

261.9

206.6

120.4

119.6

100

84.1

50.3

44.0

38.5

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before Income Taxes and Minority 
Interests, and Net Income
Income before income taxes and minority interests rose 
¥63.3 billion, or 19.3%, compared with the previous fiscal 
year, to ¥392.2 billion.

Net  income  after  total  income  taxes  and  minority 
interests  rose  ¥55.3  billion,  or  26.7%,  compared  with 
the  previous  fiscal  year,  to  ¥261.9  billion.  Total  income 
taxes this fiscal year rose ¥6.2 billion year on year (5.1%) 
to ¥127.1 billion yen, due to the increase in net income 
before total income taxes and minority interests.

Segment Information

Automobiles Division
Net  sales  for  this  division  stood  at  ¥2,699.0  billion, 
an  increase  of  ¥452.4  billion,  or  20.1%,  year  on  year. 
Segment income also increased ¥91.9 billion, or 29.7%, 
year on year to ¥400.9 billion.

The  number  of  units  sold  worldwide  increased  by 
86,000 units, or 10.4%, year on year to 911,000 units, owing 
to  the  strength  in  the  North  American  market.  Vehicle 
unit sales posted a record for the third consecutive year 
both globally and outside Japan, and for the sixth consec-
utive year in the North American market.

Domestic Market
In  Japan,  individual  consumption  fell  in  reaction  to  the 
last-minute demand prior to the increase in the consump-
tion tax rate, which dampened demand for vehicles. Unit 
sales of passenger and mini vehicles decreased year on 
year by 8.9% and 3.9% respectively, for a combined 6.9% 
dip, with overall unit sales of 5,297,000 units nationwide.
Amidst these market conditions, FHI's unit sales of 
vehicles decreased by 19,000 units, or 10.4%, year on 
year to 163,000 units. Unit sales of passenger vehicles 
rose  by  2,000  units,  or  1.4%,  year  on  year  to  128,000 
units, thanks primarily to the favorable launch of the new 
model Levorg, among other new models. At the same 
time, unit sales of mini vehicles were down 21,000 units, 
or  37.1%  year  on  year,  to  35,000  units,  impacted  by 
reduced demand after the rush ahead of the consump-
tion tax increase, as well as bearing the brunt of intensi-
fying competition due to the launch of new models by 
our competitors.
Overseas Market
Overseas  unit  sales  amounted  to  748,000  units,  an 
increase  of  104,000  units,  or  16.2%,  year  on  year.  In 
our  key  market  of  North  America,  sales  were  strong 
for Forester, Legacy, and Outback, while the new WRX 
model offered an added boost to results.

By  region,  units  sold  in  North  America  increased 
92,000 units, or 19.3%, year on year to 570,000 units. In 
Europe and Russia, sales volume was relatively unchanged 
at 47,000 units. China saw an increase of 9,000 units, or 
20.1%, to 54,000 units, while unit sales in Australia dipped 
1,000 units, or 1.6%, to 39,000 units, with other regions up 
4,000 units, or 10.4%, to 38,000 units.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

35

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Analysis of Increases and Decreases in Operating Income
(Consolidated, Three-Year YoY Comparison) 

(Billions of yen)

51.1

19.7

326.5

170.2

-24.0

-10.9

120.4

Operating income 
FYE March 2013

Gain on currency 
exchange

Improvement of 
mixture and others
sales volume & 

Cost reduction

SG&A expenses 
and others

R&D expenses

Operating income 
FYE March 2014

70.3

12.4

103.7

326.5

-66.6

-23.2

423.0

Operating income 
FYE March 2014

Gain on currency 
exchange

Improvement of 
mixture and others
sales volume & 

Cost reduction

SG&A expenses 
and others

R&D expenses

Operating income 
FYE March 2015

30.6

13.3

82.7

503.0

-33.1

-13.5

423.0

Operating income 
FYE March 2015

Gain on currency 
exchange

Improvement of 
mixture and others
sales volume & 

Cost reduction

SG&A expenses 
and others

R&D expenses

Operating income 
FYE March 2016 

(plan)

 
 
 
 
Aerospace Division
Net sales in this division increased ¥18.4 billion, or 14.8%, 
compared  to  the  previous  fiscal  year  to  ¥142.8  billion. 
Segment income also rose ¥4.8 billion, or 33.7%, year on 
year to ¥18.9 billion. 

Sales of the C-2 transport aircraft to the Japanese 
Ministry of Defense exceeded that of the previous fiscal 
year,  while  sales  to  the  commercial  sector  increased 
over the previous fiscal year thanks to net sales-boosting 
factors such as the exchange rate and a surge in produc-
tion of the Boeing 787, among others.

Industrial Products Division
Net  sales  in  the  Industrial  Products  division  were  down 
¥0.7 billion, or 2.5%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥29.0 
billion. Segment income increased ¥0.1 billion, or 23.3% 
year on year, to ¥0.8 billion.

Sales  were  higher  for  leisure-related  engines  in 
North America, and sales were markedly higher for pres-
sure washer engines for North American big box hard-
ware stores. Sales for general purpose engines for Japan 
and other products, however, were lower.

Other Division
Net  sales  in  this  division  were  down  ¥0.2  billion,  or 
2.5%, year on year to ¥7.1 billion. Segment income was 
also down, posting a ¥0.2 billion dip, or 10.2%, from 
the previous fiscal year to ¥1.9 billion.

Liquidity and Financing

Financial Position
Total assets as of March 31, 2015 stood at ¥2,199.7 billion, 
an increase of ¥311.4 billion compared with the previous 
fiscal year-end.

Of this total, current assets stood at ¥1,473.3 billion, 
up ¥199.5 billion compared with March 31, 2014. This is 
primarily due to rises in funds in hand plus securities by 
¥88.7  billion  that  include  cash  and  deposits,  as  well  as 
products  and  goods  by  ¥43.8  billion.  Meanwhile,  total 
property, plant and equipment rose ¥111.9 billion to ¥726.4 

billion compared to the previous fiscal year-end. This was 
mainly attributable to an increase in noncurrent assets of 
¥53.9 billion and investment securities of ¥34.8 billion.

Total  liabilities  were  up  ¥50.7  billion  year  on  year, 
to ¥1,169.0 billion. The main factors behind this increase 
were a ¥44.7 billion rise in accounts payable with accounts 

Net Sales by Segment  (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

Operating Income by Segment  (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

Automobiles

Aerospace

Industrial Products

Other

Automobiles

Aerospace

Industrial Products

Other

Corporate and Elimination

2,408.1

1,913.0

1,580.6

1,517.1

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2,877.9

450

423.0

326.5

300

150

0

120.4

84.1

44.0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Net Sales by Segment  (Billions of yen)

Operating Income by Segment  (Billions of yen)

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

  Automobiles

¥1,452.2

¥1,389.1

¥1,779.0

¥2,246.6

¥2,699.0

  Aerospace

  Industrial Products 

  Other

Total

82.8

30.1

15.5

80.3

33.6

14.2

89.1

30.1

14.7

124.4

142.8

29.8

7.3

29.0

7.1

¥1,580.6

¥15,17.1

¥1,913.0

¥24,08.1

¥2,877.9

Total

  Automobiles

  Aerospace

  Industrial Products 

  Other

  Corporate and Elimination

2011
¥80.4
2.3
(0.1)
1.5
0.1
¥84.1

2012
¥39.4
2.9
0.5
1.0
2.0
¥44.0

2013
¥111.0
6.8
0.6
1.6
0.4
¥120.4

2014
¥309.0
14.1
0.6
2.1
0.6
¥326.5

2015
¥400.9
18.9
0.8
1.9
0.6
¥423.0

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

36

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
 
payable-trade and electronically recorded monetary obliga-
tions, and a rise in accrued expenses of ¥34.1 billion, despite 
a decrease in long-term borrowings of ¥38.4 billion.

Note  that  the  fiscal  year-end  balance  of  interest-
bearing debt decreased ¥58.5 billion to ¥211.2 billion. The 
debt/equity ratio (interest-bearing debt over shareholders' 
equity) remained at a safe level of 0.21.

Net assets totaled ¥1,030.7 billion, up ¥260.6 billion 
compared with the end of the previous fiscal year. This was 
primarily due to an increase in retained earnings of ¥213.5 
billion, reflecting the recording of net income in the fiscal 
year under review. The increase in net assets boosted the 
shareholders' equity ratio to 46.5%,  a  6-point  increase 
year on year.

Cash Flows
In the fiscal year under review, net cash provided by oper-
ating activities was ¥311.5 billion compared with ¥313.0 
billion  in  the  previous  fiscal  year.  Income  before  income 
taxes  and  minority  interests  stood  at  ¥392.2  billion,  and 
total income taxes at ¥193.1 billion.

Net  cash  used  in  investing  activities  was  ¥172.8 
billion in the fiscal year under review compared with ¥33.9 
billion used in the previous fiscal year. This figure primarily 
reflects ¥25.5 billion in expenditures (net) due to acquisition 
of investment securities and ¥113.6 billion in expenditures 
(net) due to acquisition of noncurrent assets. As a result, 
free  cash  flow  amounted  to  ¥138.8  billion,  compared  to 
¥279.1 billion provided in the previous fiscal year. 

Net  cash  used  in  financing  activities  totaled  ¥110.5 
billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, compared 
with ¥63.0 billion in the preceding fiscal year. This is mainly 
attributable  to  ¥36.7  billion  in  expenditures  (net)  for  the 
repayment  of  long-term  borrowings  and  ¥49.9  billion  in 

dividend payments.

Accounting for the aforementioned activities and the 
effect  of  translation  adjustments,  cash  and  cash  equiva-
lents as of the end of the fiscal year under review stood at 
¥612.1 billion.

Research and Development Expenses
During  the  fiscal  year  under  review,  R&D  expenses 
increased ¥23.4 billion, or 38.9%, year on year to ¥83.5 
billion.  Of  that  amount,  ¥82.4  billion  was  related  to  the 
Automobiles Division.

Our  vehicle  R&D  is  dedicated  to  comprehensive 
performance, safety, design, environmentally conscious 
features,  and  quality  improvement  as  part  of  the  "Six 
initiatives to enhance the Subaru brand" announced in our 
mid-term management vision, Prominence 2020. In the 
same  vein,  we  are  advancing  product  development  to 
exceed customer expectations for safety and comfort.

The next generation Subaru Global Platform (SGP) is 
compliant with the most recent collision safety standards 
worldwide and has entered the final development stage 
before  commercialization.  We  will  use  this  platform  to 
manufacture new Subaru products from 2016 onward.

In addition, our EyeSight advanced driving support 
system continues to undergo research and development, 
with  automated  highway  driving,  including  lane  change 
features, targeted for 2020.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

37

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Total Assets, Shareholders’ Equity & Ratio of Shareholders’ Equity 
to Total Assets  (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

Total Assets

Shareholders’ Equity

Ratio of Shareholders’ Equity to Total Assets

2,500

2,000

2,199.7

1,888.4

46.5%

1,500

34.7%

1,352.5

1,577.5

37.7% 

40.5%

1,188.3

33.3% 

60.0

48.0

36.0

1,000

500

414.0

451.6

1,030.7

24.0

770.1

596.8

12.0

0

1.00

0.75

0.50

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Interest-Bearing Debt Balance & D/E Ratio 
Years ended March 31

 (Billions of yen, Times)

Interest-Bearing Debt Balance

D/E Ratio

400

300

200

100

0

330.6

341.0

0.80

0.76

307.2

269.7

0.52

211.2

0.35

0.25

0.21

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures and Depreciation
Capital  expenditures  rose  ¥42.2  billion,  or  61.6%, 
compared with the previous fiscal year, to ¥110.7 billion. 
The main expenditure was investing in facilities related to 
production, R&D, and sales in the Automobiles Division.

In  this  Division,  ¥42.5  billion  was  spent  primarily 
on  building  out  production  capacity  accompanying  the 
increase  in  vehicle  sales,  building  production  facilities 
for new models, building R&D facilities, and expanding 
and enhancing our sales network. In addition, ¥39.6 billion 
was spent at Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA), our 
production base in the U.S., primarily on production facili-
ties and production capacity expansion.

Depreciation increased ¥9.9 billion, or 18.0%, year 

on year, to ¥64.8 billion.

Basic Policy Regarding the Distribution of Profits
FHI  views  the  interest  of  shareholders  as  a  critical  task 
for  management.  Regarding  the  return  of  profits  to 
shareholders,  based  on  maintaining  continual  dividend 
payments, we apply a results-linked approach that takes 
into  consideration  such  factors  as  earnings,  investment 
plans, and operating conditions of each fiscal year. The divi-
dend each fiscal year is determined based on a 20-40% 
consolidated dividend payout ratio and takes a variety of 
conditions into consideration.

During the fiscal year under review, FHI distributed a 
total  dividend  of  ¥68  per  share,  a  ¥15  increase  over  the 
previous fiscal year. Retained earnings are allocated toward 
bolstering  our  financial  position  and  investing  in  future 
growth  and  progress,  including  strengthening  R&D  and 
our production and sales frameworks.

The dividend for the next fiscal year is undetermined 
at present. We are aware that FHI is entering a new stage 

now that our financial standing has improved, but our policy 
is to comprehensively consider and review future operating 
conditions, external factors, changes in ROE, etc.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities & Cash Flows from 
Investing Activities 
Years ended March 31

(Billions of yen)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Outlook

Results for FYE March 2016
For  the  fiscal  year  ending  March  31,  2016,  we  are  fore-
casting a new all-time-high consolidated unit sales figure, 
for the fourth year in a row, of 928,000 units, an increase of 
18,000 units, or 1.9%, compared with the fiscal year under 
review. Along with the unit sales target, we are also aiming 
to post new historical records for net sales and all income 
categories for a fourth year running.

At  present  (July  2015),  targets  for  the  consolidated 
financial results of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016 
are as follows.

For net sales, FHI plans to achieve ¥3,030.0 billion, 
representing  an  increase  of  ¥152.1  billion,  or  5.3%, 
compared with the previous fiscal year, thanks to a ¥19.0 
billion improvement in sales mix resulting from increasing 
unit  sales  outside  Japan,  and  a  ¥131.1  billion  gain  on 
currency exchange.

For  operating  income,  despite  increases  in  R&D 
expenses  and  SG&A  expenses,  we  anticipate  posting 
¥503.0 billion, an increase of ¥80.0 billion, or 18.9%, year 
on year thanks to the positive effects of ¥82.7 billion from 
currency fluctuations and ¥30.6 billion from improved sales 
mix,  among  other  gains.  Net  income*  is  slated  to  climb 
¥75.1 billion, or 28.7%, year on year to ¥337.0 billion. 

These  forecasts  are  based  on  average  annual 
exchange rates of ¥118/US$ (previously ¥108/US$) and 
¥125/€ (previously ¥140/€).

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

313.0

311.5

138.2

166.7

54.9

-26.6

-51.1

-33.9

-71.4

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

-172.8

Free Cash Flow (Billions of yen)
Years ended March 31

300

200

100

87.1

95.3

279.1

138.8

*Expected net income for the consolidated fiscal year ending March 31, 2016 is the fiscal 
year net income attributable to shareholders of the parent company.

0

2011

28.3

2012

2013

2014

2015

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

38

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and Development Expenses
Years ended March 31

(Billions of yen)

100

80

60

40

20

0

83.5

60.1

48.1

49.1

42.9

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Capital Expenditures, Depreciation Expenses 
Years ended March 31

(Billions of yen)

Capital Expenditures 

Depreciation Expenses

110.7

70.2

68.5

64.8

54.3

53.7

55.9

54.9

49.8

43.1

120

90

60

30

0

Reassessing the Three-Year Investment Plan
We  have  decided  to  reassess  our  consolidated  three-
year investment plan (FYE March 2015 to 2017), which 
was announced last year, as automobiles sales, mainly 
in  North  America,  continue  their  strength.  This  invest-
ment  will  help  considerably  to  relieve  supply  shortfalls 
and  further  bolster  our  environmental  and  safety  tech-
nologies. We increased the initially allocated amount of 
capital  expenditures  by  ¥70.0  billion,  to  ¥400.0  billion, 
and the initial amount of R&D expenses by ¥30.0 billion, 
to ¥280.0 billion.

These  investment  plan  revisions  will  allow  us  to 
bring Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. (SIA) expansion 
plans  ahead  by  four  years  and  build  out  global  produc-
tion capacity to 1,026,000 vehicles by the end of 2016. In 
addition, we are renovating our painting facility in Japan, 
slated to be operational in 2018, as we strive for the dual 
objectives  of  improved  quality  and  stronger  environ-
mental responsiveness.

Scheduled FYE March 2016 increases over the fiscal 
year under review are: capital expenditures up ¥19.3 billion, 
to ¥130.0 billion; R&D expenses up ¥13.5 billion, to ¥97.0 
billion; and depreciation up ¥2.2 billion, to ¥67.0 billion.

Performance  forecasts  and  medium-  to  long-term 
management strategies are based on information available 
to management as of the date of this report. Accord-
ingly,  actual  results  may  differ  materially  due  to  a 
variety of factors.

Business Risks
Operational and other risks that could significantly influ-
ence the decisions of investors and impact the Compa-
ny’s financial status are set out below. 

Forecast for Consolidated Results  (Billions of yen)

Net sales

   Japan

   Overseas

Operating income

Income before income taxes and minority interest

Net income

Exchange rate (in yen)

   ¥/$

   ¥/€

2015
2,877.9
652.9
2,225.0
423.0
392.2
261.9

10.8
14.0

2016 (plan)
3,030.0
565.5
2,464.5
503.0
485.0
337.0

Change
152.1
(87.4)
239.5
80.0
92.8
75.1

11.8
12.5

1.0
(1.5)

Forecast for Global Automobile Sales  (Thousand units)

Japan:

   Passenger cars

   Minicars

Subtotal

Overseas:

   United States

   Canada

   Russia

   Europe

   Australia

   China

   Other

Subtotal

Total

2015

2016 (plan)

Change

127.9
34.9
162.8

527.6
42.4
11.6
35.7
38.9
53.8
37.9
747.9
910.7

106.7
37.6
144.2

554
46.2
12.8
37.7
42.3
49.7
41.4
784.1
928.3

(21.2)
2.7
(18.5)

26.4
3.8
1.2
2.0 
3.4
(4.1)
3.5
36.2
17.6

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Based on information available to the FHI Group as 

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

39

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
 
 
 
or a limited number of suppliers. Due to tightening supply 
and  demand  or  other  factors,  the  inability  to  procure 
supplies in a manner that ensures stable costs, delivery 
dates and quality could seriously impact the Group’s busi-
ness performance and financial position.

(6) Protection of Intellectual Property
The FHI Group works to protect its intellectual property 
through the use of patents, designs, and trademarks in 
such  areas  as  technologies  and  expertise  that  ensure 
product differentiation. However, the Group could experi-
ence a decrease in sales or the need for litigation proce-
dures in cases where a third party makes unauthorized 
use of the Group’s intellectual property to manufacture 
similar products, as well as in specific regions where intel-
lectual  property  right  protection  is  limited.  Such  factors 
could impact the Group’s profitability.

of the submission date of our financial report (June 24, 
2015), the enumerated risks include forward-looking state-
ments, but do not encompass every possible risk posed 
to  the  FHI  Group.  As  such,  there  are  other  risk  factors 
which could influence investors and their decisions.

(1) Economic Trends
Economic  trends  in  countries  and  regions  that  comprise 
important  markets  for  the  FHI  Group  could  potentially 
impact the Group’s business performance. In Japan and 
North  America,  key  markets  for  the  Group,  economic 
recession, decreasing demand or increasing price compe-
tition  could  undermine  the  sales  and  profitability  of  the 
Group’s products and services.

(2) Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations
The FHI Group’s ratio of overseas net sales stood at 77.3%. 
The Group’s consolidated financial statements, which are 
presented in Japanese yen, are affected by translation of 
overseas net sales, operating income and assets from local 
currencies, particularly U.S. dollars, into yen. Accordingly, 
in  the  event  that  discrepancies  arise  between  projected 
exchange rates in full-year forecasts and actual rates at the 
time of account settlement, the Group’s business perfor-
mance  and  financial  position  may  be  adversely  affected 
when the yen appreciates or positively affected when the 
yen depreciates. 

The Company uses forward exchange rate contracts 
and other risk hedges to minimize the Group’s sensitivity 
to  such  currency  exchange  risks.  However,  the  effect 
of  severe  fluctuations  in  currency  exchange  rates  at  the 
end  of  the  fiscal  year  could  result  in  a  loss  on  valuation 

of derivatives and have a major impact on non-operating 
expenses.

(3) Dependence on Certain Businesses
The FHI Group is mainly comprised of the Automobiles, 
Industrial Products and Aerospace business segments. 
However, the Automobiles business segment accounts 
for the overwhelming majority of the Group’s business 
operations.  Accordingly,  in  the  event  that  automobile-
related  demand,  market  conditions,  price  competition 
with other automakers, or other factors exceed projected 
levels, the entire Group’s overall business performance 
and financial position could be significantly affected.

(4) Changes in Market Appraisal
The FHI Group develops, manufactures and releases new 
products based on appropriate timing and pricing in line 
with product planning that reflects market demand and 
customer  needs.  Such  actions  are  the  most  important 
factors  in  maintaining  stable  increases  in  Group  busi-
ness  performance.  In  the  event  that  market  appraisals 
of new model vehicles and other products do not meet 
sales plan expectations or that the obsolescence rate of 
current  products  exceeds  forecasts,  the  Group’s  busi-
ness performance and financial position could be signifi-
cantly affected.

(5) Dependence on Suppliers for Raw Materials and 
Components
The FHI Group procures raw materials, components and 
other  items  from  numerous  suppliers.  However,  there 
are cases in which the Group relies on certain items and/

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

40

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

 
(7) Product Defects
The FHI Group places the highest priority on the safety of 
the products it develops, manufactures and sells. However, 
completely avoiding defects and recalls regarding all prod-
ucts  and  services  is  impossible.  The  substantial  costs 
associated with a major recall could significantly affect 
the Group’s business performance and financial position. 
In addition, although the Group purchases product liability 
insurance, the risk of incomplete coverage exists. 

(8) Retirement Benefit Obligations
The  FHI  Group’s  employee  retirement  benefit  costs 
and  obligations  are  calculated  based  on  the  following 
assumptions:  retirement  benefit  obligation  discount 
rates and the expected rate of return on pension assets, 
both  of  which  are  established  based  on  mathematical 
calculations.  However,  in  the  event  that  actual  perfor-
mance differs from the assumptions, the Group’s busi-
ness performance and financial position could be affected 
over the long term.

(9) Environmental and Other Legal Regulations
The FHI Group is subject to various domestic and over-
seas legal regulations in relation to such areas as exhaust 
emissions,  energy  conservation,  noise,  recycling,  the 
level of pollutants emitted from manufacturing facilities 
and  automobile  safety.  The  Group’s  business  perfor-
mance  and  financial  position  could  be  affected  by  an 
increase in costs due to future regulatory changes.

(10)  The  Impact  of  Natural  Disasters,  War,  Terror, 
Strikes and Other Events
The occurrence of major earthquakes, diseases, wars, 
terrorist attacks or other events could impede the FHI 
Group’s business activities as well as delay or suspend raw 
material/component purchases, production, product sales/
transport, and the provision of services. The Group’s busi-
ness performance and financial position could be affected 
in the event that such delays or suspensions are prolonged.

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

41

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Corporate Data 

(as of March 31, 2015)

Stock Information

(as of March 31, 2015)

Company Name
Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.

Established
July 15, 1953

Paid-in Capital
¥153,795 million

Number of Employees
13,883 (consolidated: 29,774)

Website Address
http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/ir/

Head Office
Ebisu Subaru Bldg., 1-20-8, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8554, Japan
Phone: +81-3-6447-8000 Fax: +81-3-6447-8184

Investor Relations Office
Ebisu Subaru Bldg., 1-20-8, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8554, Japan
Phone: +81-3-6447-8878 Fax: +81-3-6447-8107

Domestic Manufacturing Divisions
Gunma Manufacturing Division (Automobiles Division)
Utsunomiya Manufacturing Division (Aerospace Division)
Saitama Manufacturing Division (Industrial Products Division)

Common Stock Authorized
1,500,000,000 shares

Common Stock Issued
782,865,873 shares

Number of Shareholders
76,446

Stock Exchange Listing
Tokyo Stock Exchange

Transfer Agent
Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.
2-1, Yaesu 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 
103-0028, Japan

Major Shareholders

Name

Toyota Motor Corporation

The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. 
(Trust account)

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. 
(Trust account)

Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Suzuki Motor Corporation

Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance Inc.

FHI's Client Stock Ownership

Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 
SA/NV 10

MIZUHO SECURITIES ASIA 
LIMITED-CLIENT A/C 69250601

Number of Shares Held
(in thousands)

Percentage of
Total Shares

129,000

16.48

42,266

34,282

16,078

13,690

12,157

10,962

10,295

10,251

9,905

5.40

4.38

2.05

1.75

1.55

1.40

1.32

1.31

1.27

Principal Consolidated Subsidiaries and Affiliates

Quarterly Common Stock Price Range (Tokyo Stock Exchange)

(Yen)

Company Name

Percentage of
Voting Rights

Main Business Activities

Japan

   Fuji Machinery Co., Ltd.

   Ichitan Co., Ltd.

   Kiryu Industrial Co., Ltd.

100.0%

100.0%

97.7%

Manufacture and sales of automobile parts and industrial product parts

Manufacture and sales of forged automobile / industrial product parts

Manufacture of Subaru specially equipped automobiles and distribution of Subaru automobile parts

   Subaru Tecnica International Inc.

100.0%

Management of SUBARU Motorsport Activities, Development and manufacture of competition 
parts, tuning parts and accessories for SUBARU cars

   Subaru Kohsan Co., Ltd.

   Subaru Finance Co., Ltd.

   Yusoki Kogyo K.K.

   TOKYO SUBARU INC.

Overseas

   Subaru of America, Inc.

   Fuji Heavy Industries U.S.A., Inc.

   Subaru Research & Development, Inc.

   Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc.

   Subaru Canada, Inc.

   Subaru Europe N.V./S.A.

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Leasing of real estate, shopping mall management and travel agency operations

Lease & credit facilities provider for Subaru automobiles, financing for FHI subsidized companies, 
lease for various facility equipment, rolling stock & FHI made garbage trucks and sales of insurance

Manufacture and sales for aircraft parts

Distribution, sales and services of Subaru automobiles (including 32 other dealerships)

Distribution and sales of Subaru automobiles and parts

Engineering research of Subaru automobiles in North America Market

Research and development of automobiles

Manufacture of Subaru automobiles and contracted manufacture of Toyota automobiles

Distribution and sales of Subaru automobiles and parts

Distribution, sales and marketing of Subaru automobiles and parts

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

High
Low

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

2011

758
435

2012

697
402

2013

1,609
545

2014

3,015
1,330

2015

4,617
2,380

FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

42

ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.
Ebisu Subaru Bldg., 1-20-8, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8554
Phone: +81-3-6447-8000
Fax: +81-3-6447-8184
http://www.fhi.co.jp/english/ir/

Annual Report

2015

For the year ended March 31, 2015

Consolidated Balance Sheets
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014

ASSETS
Current assets: 

Cash and deposits (Note 4 and 5)
Notes and accounts receivable-trade (Note 5)
Lease investment assets (Note 5 and 18)
Short-term investment securities (Notes 4, 5 and 6) 
Merchandise and finished goods
Work in process 
Raw materials and supplies
Deferred tax assets (Note 12)
Short-term loans receivable (Note 5, 23)
Other current assets
Allowance for doubtful accounts 
Total current assets 

Property, plant and equipment (Notes 7 and 9)

Accumulated depreciation
Accumulated impairment loss
Total property, plant and equipment

Investments and other assets: 

Intangible assets
Investment securities (Note 5 and 6)
Investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies
Net defined benefit assets(Note 11)
Deferred tax assets (Note 12) 
Other assets 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  
Total investments and other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Current liabilities: 

Notes and accounts payable-trade (Note 5)
Electronically recorded obligations-operating (Note 5)
Short-term loans payable (Note 5 and 7)
Current portion of long-term debts (Note 5 and 7)
Accrued expenses (Note 5)
Provision for bonuses
Provision for product warranties
Accrued income taxes (Note 5 and 12)
Other current liabilities (Note 5, 7 and 12)
Total current liabilities

Long-term liabilities:

Long-term debts (Note 5 and 7) 
Net defined benefit liability(Note 11)
Deferred tax liabilities (Note 12)
Other long-term liabilities (Note 7)
Total long-term liabilities

Contingent liabilities (Note 20)
Net assets: (Note 13)
Shareholders' equity:
Capital stock

Authorized— 1,500,000,000 shares
782,865,873 shares
Issued —  

Capital surplus
Retained earnings 
Less-treasury stock, at cost,

2015— 
2014— 
Total shareholders’ equity

2,483,395 shares 
2,477,430 shares    

Accumulated other comprehensive income: 

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans
Remeasurements of other postretirement benefits
Total accumulated other comprehensive income

Minority interests

Total net assets

Total liabilities and net assets 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.

120.27

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)

 Millions of yen

2015

2014

2015

¥228,821
164,540
24,098
444,737
203,347
52,734
39,569
78,789
157,070
80,796
(1,233)
1,473,268

1,423,977
(882,752)
(26,528)
514,697

16,850
104,157
10,678
3,659
13,113
96,371
(33,079)
211,749
¥2,199,714

¥351,125
181,646
23,633
233,766
159,536
51,659
33,008
64,214
122,681
53,375
(862)
1,273,781

1,305,951
(817,421)
(27,717)
460,813

14,712
75,647
4,479
1,222
18,332
72,974
(33,597)
153,769
¥1,888,363

 Millions of yen

2015

2014

¥317,801
74,420
41,443
44,329
126,007
21,668
49,708
54,987
142,693
873,056

125,420
17,963
13,996
138,560
295,939

¥279,926
67,637
59,193
46,617
91,921
20,446
39,494
110,426
117,248
832,908

163,844
22,852
9,827
88,861
285,384

$1,902,561
1,368,088
200,366
3,697,822
1,690,754
438,463
329,001
655,101
1,305,978
671,788
(10,252)
12,249,672

11,839,835
(7,339,752)
(220,570)
4,279,513

140,101
866,026
88,784
30,423
109,030
801,289
(275,039)
1,760,614
$18,289,798

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars

(Note 1)
2015

$2,642,396
618,774
344,583
368,579
1,047,701
180,161
413,303
457,196
1,186,439
7,259,134

1,042,820
149,356
116,371
1,152,074
2,460,622

153,795
160,071
697,414
(1,382)

153,795
160,071
483,910
(1,395)

1,278,748
1,330,930
5,798,736
(11,491)

1,009,898

796,381

8,396,924

17,986
10,025
(11,616)
(3,876)
12,519
8,302

10,629
(26,661)
(13,886)
(919)
(30,837)
4,527

149,547
83,354
(96,583)
(32,227)
104,091
69,028

1,030,719

770,071

8,570,042

¥2,199,714

¥1,888,363

$18,289,798

Consolidated Statements of Income
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

120.27

Net sales (Note 2)
Cost of sales (Note 14)
Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative expenses (Note 2 and 15)

Operating income (loss)

Other income (expenses):

Interest and dividend income
Interest expenses
Equity in earnings of affiliates
Real estate rent
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
Gain (loss) on valuation of derivatives
Gain (loss) on sales and retirement of noncurrent assets
Gain (loss) on sales of investment securities (Note 6 and 16)
Loss on valuation of investment securities (Note 6)
Depreciation
Impairment loss (Note 9)
Provision of allowance for doubtful accounts(Note 17)
Other, net 

Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests

Income taxes (Note 12):

Current
Deferred

Income (loss) before minority interests

Minority interests in income (loss) 
Net income (loss)

Per share data (Note 2) :

Net income (loss)

—Basic 
—Diluted *

Net assets 
Cash dividends (Note 13) 

Millions of yen

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)

2015

2014

2015

¥2,877,913
2,017,490
860,423
437,378
423,045

¥2,408,129
1,728,271
679,858
353,369
326,489

$23,928,769
16,774,674
7,154,095
3,636,634
3,517,461

4,127
(2,903)
499
532
(24,277)
(2,003)
(3,305)
953
-
(985)
(38)
-
(3,439)
(30,839)
392,206

133,256
(6,199)
127,057
265,149
3,276
¥261,873

2,914
(2,804)
320
541
(16,924)
7,414
(2,696)
47,155
(6)
(1,024)
(35)
(29,624)
(2,855)
2,376
328,865

134,315
(13,435)
120,880
207,985
1,369
¥206,616

¥335.57
-
1,310.15
68.00

¥264.98
-
980.98
53.00

34,314
(24,137)
4,149
4,423
(201,854)
(16,654)
(27,480)
7,924
-
(8,190)
(316)
-
(28,594)
(256,415)
3,261,046

1,107,974
(51,542)
1,056,432
2,204,615
27,239
$2,177,376

U.S. dollars

$2.79
-
10.89
0.57

120.27

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
*For the year ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 diluted information is not presented because potentially dilutive securities do not exist.  

Consolidated Statements of  Comprehensive Income
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

Income (loss) before minority interests
Other comprehensive income (Note 3)

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans
Remeasurements of other postretirement benefits of  foreign consolidated subsidiaries
Share of other comprehensive income of associates accounted for using equity method
Total other comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

(Comprehensive income attributable to)
Comprehensive income attributable to owners of the parent
Comprehensive income attributable to minority interests

Millions of yen

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)

2015

2014

2015

¥265,149

¥207,985

$2,204,615

7,357
37,321
2,270
(2,957)
131
44,122

(17,253)
19,855
-
-
170
2,772

61,171
310,310
18,874
(24,586)
1,089
366,858

309,271

210,757

2,571,473

305,229
4,042

209,150
1,607

2,537,865
33,608

 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014

Shareholders' equity
 Capital stock
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Balance at the end of current period
 Capital surplus
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Disposal of treasury stock
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
 Retained earnings
  Balance at the beginning of current period

Cumulative effects ofchanges in accounting policies

   Restated balance
      Changes of items during the period
   Dividends from surplus
   Net income (loss)
   Disposal of treasury stock
   Other
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
 Treasury stock
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Purchase of treasury stock
   Disposal of treasury stock
      Other
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
 Total shareholders' equity
  Balance at the beginning of current period

Cumulative effects ofchanges in accounting policies

   Restated balance
      Changes of items during the period
   Dividends from surplus
   Net income (loss)
   Purchase of treasury stock
   Disposal of treasury stock
   Other
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period

Millions of yen

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)

2015

2014

2015

¥153,795
153,795

¥153,795
153,795

$1,278,748
1,278,748

160,071

160,071

1,330,930

0
0
160,071

483,910
1,385
485,295

(49,970)
261,873
-
216
212,119
697,414

(1,395)

(22)
-
35
13
(1,382)

796,381
1,385
797,766

(49,970)
261,873
(22)
-
251
212,132
¥1,009,898

0
0
160,071

301,357
-
-

(23,424)
206,616
-
(639)
182,553
483,910

(1,292)

(103)
0
-
(103)
(1,395)

613,931
-
-

(23,424)
206,616
(103)
0
(639)
182,450
¥796,381

0
0
1,330,930

4,023,530
11,516
4,035,046

(415,482)
2,177,376
-
1,796
1,763,690
5,798,736

(11,599)

(183)
-
291
108
(11,491)

6,621,610
11,516
6,633,125

(415,482)
2,177,376
(183)
-
2,087
1,763,799
$8,396,924

   
 
   
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
 Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities
       Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
 Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
  Remeasurements of defined benefit plans
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
   Total changes of items during the period
Balance at the end of current period
 Remeasurements of other postretirement benefits
   of foreign consolidated subsidiaries
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
   Total changes of items during the period
Balance at the end of current period
 Total accumulated other comprehensive income
  Balance at the beginning of current period
  Changes of items during the period
   Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
   Total changes of items during the period
  Balance at the end of current period
Minority interests
 Balance at the beginning of current period
      Changes of items during the period
  Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
  Total changes of items during the period
    Balance at the end of current period
Total net assets
  Balance at the beginning of current period
    Cumulative effects of changes in accounting policies
  Restated balance
 Changes of items during the period
  Dividends from surplus
  Net income (loss)
     Purchase of treasury stock
    Disposal of treasury stock
  Other
  Net changes of items other than shareholders' equity
  Total changes of items during the period
   Balance at the end of current period
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Millions of yen

2015

2014

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)
2015

¥10,629

¥27,882

7,357
7,357
17,986

(17,253)
(17,253)
10,629

$88,376

61,171
61,171
149,547

(26,661)

(46,448)

(221,676)

36,686
36,686
10,025

(13,886)

2,270
2,270
(11,616)

(919)

(2,957)
(2,957)
(3,876)

19,787
19,787
(26,661)

305,030
305,030
83,354

-

(115,457)

(13,886)
(13,886)
(13,886)

-

(919)
(919)
(919)

18,874
18,874
(96,583)

(7,641)

(24,586)
(24,586)
(32,227)

(30,837)

(18,566)

(256,398)

43,356
43,356
12,519

4,527

3,775
3,775
8,302

770,071
1,385
771,456

(49,970)
261,873
(22)
-
251
47,131
259,263
¥1,030,719

(12,271)
(12,271)
(30,837)

1,448

3,079
3,079
4,527

596,813
-
596,813

(23,424)
206,616
(103)
0
(639)
(9,192)
173,258
¥770,071

360,489
360,489
104,091

37,640

31,388
31,388
69,028

6,402,852
11,516
6,414,368

(415,482)
2,177,376
(183)
-
2,087
391,877
2,155,675
$8,570,042

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 Income (loss) before income taxes
 Depreciation and amortization
 Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts
 Interest and dividends income
 Interest expenses
 Loss (gain) on sales and retirement of noncurrent assets
 Loss (gain) on sales and valuation of investment securities
 Decrease (increase) in operating loans receivable
 Decrease (increase) in notes and accounts receivable-trade
 Decrease (increase) in inventories
 Increase (decrease) in notes and accounts payable-trade
 Other, net

    Sub total

 Interest and dividends income received
 Interest expenses paid
 Income taxes paid

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  Net decrease (increase) in time deposits
  Purchase of short-term investment securities
  Proceeds from sales of short-term investment securities
  Purchase of non-current assets
  Proceeds from sales of non-current assets
  Purchase of investment securities
  Proceeds from sales of investment securities
  Payments of loans receivable
 Collection of loans receivable

    Other, net

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    Net increase (decrease) in short-term loans payable
    Proceeds from long-term loans payable
    Repayments of long-term loans payable
    Redemption of bonds
    Cash dividends paid
    Proceeds from stock issuance to minority shareholders
    Other, net

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
       Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents resulting 
       from change of scope of consolidation
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Millions of yen

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars
(Note 1)

2015

2014

2015

¥392,206
71,821
(146)
(4,127)
2,903
3,305
(953)
(23,112)
19,283
(27,180)
38,223
30,920
503,143

4,361
(2,839)
(193,122)
311,543

(11,944)
(43,424)
17,905
(115,173)
1,540
(47,031)
26,364
(104,891)
108,065
(4,191)
(172,780)

(18,811)
6,190
(42,858)
(4,060)
(49,887)
-
(1,120)
(110,546)
25,998
54,215

¥328,865
61,486
29,512
(2,914)
2,804
2,696
(47,149)
(25,478)
(49,129)
16,095
39,814
(10,304)
346,298

2,936
(2,742)
(33,468)
313,024

(7,215)
(12,408)
19,237
(72,855)
1,643
(28,687)
65,344
(95,589)
97,409
(782)
(33,903)

(2,893)
8,995
(45,893)
(10)
(23,350)
1,280
(1,140)
(63,011)
12,691
228,801

$3,261,046
597,165
(1,214)
(34,314)
24,137
27,480
(7,924)
(192,168)
160,331
(225,992)
317,810
257,088
4,183,446

36,260
(23,605)
(1,605,737)
2,590,363

(99,310)
(361,054)
148,873
(957,620)
12,805
(391,045)
219,207
(872,129)
898,520
(34,847)
(1,436,601)

(156,406)
51,468
(356,348)
(33,757)
(414,792)
-
(9,312)
(919,149)
216,164
450,777

557,870

328,947

4,638,480

-
¥612,085

122
¥557,870

-
$5,089,258

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES 

1. Basis of Presentation of the Financial Statements 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. (the "Company") have 
been prepared in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law 
and its related accounting regulations, and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in 
Japan ("Japanese GAAP"), which are different in certain respects as to application and disclosure 
requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards. 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restructured and translated into English from 
the consolidated financial statements of the Company prepared in accordance with Japanese GAAP and filed 
with the appropriate Local Finance Bureau of the Ministry of Finance, as required by the Financial Instruments 
and Exchange Law. Certain supplementary information included in the statutory Japanese-language 
consolidated financial statements, but not considered necessary for fair presentation, is not presented in the 
accompanying consolidated financial statements. 
The translations of the Japanese yen amounts into U.S. dollars in the accompanying consolidated financial 
statements are included solely for the convenience of readers outside Japan, using the prevailing exchange 
rate at March 31, 2015, which was ¥120.27 to U.S.$1. The convenience translation should not be construed 
as a representation that the Japanese yen amounts have been, could have been, or could in the future be 
converted into U.S. dollars at this or any other rate of exchange. 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 

[1] The Scope of Consolidation and Application of the Equity Method 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority 
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in 
consolidation. The fiscal year-end of consolidated subsidiaries is the same as that of the parent company, 
except for 5 consolidated foreign subsidiaries in fiscal year 2015 and 5 consolidated foreign subsidiaries in 
fiscal year 2014, respectively, the fiscal year-end of those subsidiaries is December 31. The operating 
results of those subsidiaries that have different fiscal year-end are consolidated by using the financial 
statements as of each subsidiary’s respective fiscal year-end, the necessary adjustments being made 
in consolidation if there are any significant transactions between January 1 and March 31. 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and 77 subsidiaries in fiscal year 
2015 and 77 subsidiaries in fiscal year 2014, respectively. 
In addition, 1 non-consolidated subsidiary and 1 affiliated company were accounted for by the equity method 
in fiscal 2015; 1 non-consolidated subsidiary and 1 affiliated company were accounted for by the equity 
method in fiscal 2014, respectively. 
Investments in insignificant non-consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies not accounted for by the 
equity method are carried at cost.   
The difference between the cost and the underlying net equity of investments in subsidiaries and affiliated 
companies is allocated to identifiable assets based on their fair value at the date of acquisition. The 
unallocated residual value of the excess of the cost over the fair value of the underlying net assets is 
recognized as goodwill and amortized over a period of five years on a straight-line basis. 
All assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, which include not only the Company’s interest in the subsidiaries but 
also the minority interest portion, are valued based on their fair value at the time the Company first 
consolidates the subsidiary. 

[2] Short-Term Investment Securities and Investment Securities 
Under the Japanese accounting standards for financial instruments, available-for-sale securities for which fair 
1 

 
 
 
 
 
values are available are stated at their fair value as of the balance sheet dates with unrealized holding gains 
and losses included as a separate component of net assets until realized, while securities for which fair values 
are not readily available are stated at cost, as determined by the moving-average method, after taking into 
consideration devaluation, if any, for permanent impairment. Held-to-maturity debt securities are stated using 
the amortized cost method. 

[3] Inventories 
Inventories for regular sales are stated at cost, determined mainly by the moving-average cost method. (Book 
value on the balance sheet is measured based on the lower of cost or market value.)   

[4] Property, Plant and Equipment (Excluding Leased Assets) 
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Significant renewals and additions are capitalized; ordinary 
maintenance, ordinary repairs, minor renewals and minor improvements are charged to the consolidated 
statements of income as incurred. 
Depreciation of the property, plant and equipment of the Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries 
is principally calculated by the declining-balance method, except for those buildings (excluding building 
improvements) acquired on or after April 1, 1998, for which the straight-line method is applied. 
Depreciation of the property, plant and equipment of consolidated foreign subsidiaries is calculated by the 
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. 
Estimated useful lives for depreciable assets are as follows: 

Buildings and structures: 7–50 years 
Machinery, equipment and vehicles: 2–11 years 

[5] Intangible Assets (Excluding Leased Assets) 
Computer software used internally by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is amortized by the 
straight-line method over the relevant economic useful lives of 3 or 5 years. 

[6] Leased Assets 
For leased assets under finance lease transactions in which the ownership is transferred to the lessee: 
The leased assets are depreciated by the same method as used for other property, plant and equipment. 

For leased assets under finance lease transactions in which the ownership is not transferred to the lessee: 
The leased assets are depreciated by the straight-line method over the leased period and the residual value is 
zero. 
In addition, finance lease transactions in which the ownership is not transferred to the lessee on or before 
March 31, 2008 are recorded as regular rental transactions. 

[7] Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 
Allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on the amount calculated from the historical ratio of bad 
debt for ordinary receivables, and estimated amounts of uncollectible accounts for specific overdue 
receivables. 

[8] Provision for Bonuses 
Employees' bonuses are recognized as expenses for the period in which those are incurred. 

[9] Provision for Product Warranties 
The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries provide for accrued warranty claims on products sold based 
on their past experiences of warranty services and estimated future warranty costs, which are included in 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
"Accrued expenses" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 

[10] Provision for Loss on Construction Contracts 
The provision for losses on uncompleted construction of contracts in the Aerospace segment is provided 
when substantial losses on the contracts are anticipated at the fiscal year-end for the next fiscal year and 
beyond and such losses can be reasonably estimated. 

[11] Accounting method for Retirement Benefits 
Net defined benefit liability (assets) for employees is provided based on the estimated amounts of projected 
pension and severance obligation and the fair value of plan assets at the end of the fiscal year. In determining 
retirement benefit obligations, the straight-line basis is used for attributing expected benefit to periods.       
Unrecognized prior service cost is being amortized on the straight-line method over a period (10-19 years) 
that is shorter than the average remaining service period of the eligible employees. Unrecognized net 
actuarial gain or loss is amortized from the following fiscal year on the straight-line method over a period 
(primarily 16 years for fiscal years 2015 and 2014) that is shorter than the average remaining service period of 
the eligible employees.   
Directors and statutory auditors of the Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries are entitled to 
receive a lump-sum payment at the time of severance or retirement, subject to shareholder approval. The 
liabilities for such benefits, which are determined based on the Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ 
internal rules, are included in "Other long-term liabilities" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 

[12] Translation of Foreign Currency-Denominated Accounts 
Under the Japanese accounting standards for foreign currency translation, monetary assets and liabilities 
denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Japanese yen at the exchange rates prevailing at each 
balance sheet date with the resulting gain or loss included currently in the statement of income. 
The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliated companies are translated into Japanese yen at 
the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates of the foreign subsidiaries and affiliated companies, 
except for common stock and capital surplus, which are translated at historical rates. Revenue and expense 
accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the respective years. The resulting foreign 
currency translation adjustments are included in "Foreign currency translation adjustments" and "Minority 
interest" in the net assets section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 

[13] Revenue Recognition 
The percentage-of-completion method is applied to revenue from construction contracts of Aerospace 
division productions where certain elements are determinable with certainty at the end of fiscal year. (The 
percentage of completion is estimated using the proportion-of-cost method). The completed-contract method 
is applied to other works. 

[14] Accounting for Lease Transactions 
Sales and corresponding cost of sales under finance lease transactions conducted by certain domestic 
consolidated subsidiaries are recognized on the effective date of each lease contract. 

[15] Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting 
The Japanese accounting standards for financial instruments require that the Company and its consolidated 
domestic subsidiaries state derivative financial instruments at their fair value and recognize changes in the fair 
value as a gain or loss, unless such derivative financial instruments are used for hedging purposes. 
For interest rate swap contracts used as a hedge that meet certain hedging criteria, the net amount to be paid 
or received under the interest rate swap contract is added to or deducted from the interest on the assets or 
liabilities for which the swap contract is executed. 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative  financial  instruments  qualifying  as  a  hedge,  along  with  the  underlying  transactions,  assets  and 
liabilities are as follows: 

Financial Instrument   
Interest swaps   

Transactions, assets and liabilities 
Borrowings 

The risk exposures to movements in interest rates are hedged according to the Company’s and its 
consolidated subsidiaries’ risk management policy. An evaluation of hedge effectiveness is not considered 
necessary as the terms and notional amounts of these hedging instruments are the same as those of the 
underlying transactions, assets and liabilities, and therefore they are presumed to be highly effective in 
offsetting the effect of movements in interest rates at their inception as well as during their terms. 

[16] Goodwill 
Goodwill is principally amortized by the straight-line method over 5 years. 

[17] Cash and Cash Equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of 3 months or less 
that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have negligible risk of changes in value due to their 
short maturities. 

[18] Income Taxes 
Income taxes are comprised of corporation, enterprise, and inhabitants taxes. The provision for income taxes 
is computed based on the pretax income for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities 
are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial 
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded to 
reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. 

[19] Research and Development Expenses 
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to ¥83,535million (US$ 694,562 
thousand) and ¥60,092 million for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. 

[20] Net Income per Share 
Basic net income per share (EPS) is computed based on the average number of shares of common stock 
outstanding during each year. Diluted EPS assumes the potential dilution that occurs if all the convertible 
securities are converted or other contracts to issue common stock are exercised to the extent that they are 
not anti-dilutive. 

[21] Reclassification   
Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 
31, 2014 to conform to the presentation for the year ended March 31, 2015.” 

[22] Changes in Accounting Policy 
The Company has applied Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits (ASBJ Statement No. 26, May 17, 
2012 (hereinafter, the “Statement No.26”)) and Guidance on Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits 
(ASBJ Guidance No. 25, May 17, 2012 (hereinafter, the “Guidance No.25”)) from the first quarter of fiscal year 
2015 in accordance with the article 35 of the Statement No.26 and the article 67 of the Guidance No.25. 
The Company has reviewed the method of calculating retirement benefit obligations and current service costs 
and has changed the method of attributing expected benefits to periods from a straight-line basis to a benefit 
formula basis, and the method of determination of discount rate from the method using discount rate based 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
on the average remaining service period for employees to the method using a single weighted average 
discount rate reflecting the expected payment periods and the amounts for each expected payment period. 
In accordance with the article 37 of the Statement No.26, the effect of changes in the calculation method of 
retirement benefit obligations and current service costs has been recognized in retained earnings at the 
beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. 
The effect of application of the Statement No.26 and the Guidance No.25 is not material. 
In addition, the influence to Per share information refers to the concerned note. 

[23] Changes in Presentation Method 
(Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows) 
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, the presentation method in the Consolidated Statements of Cash 
Flows was changed to raise the clarity as follows.   
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, “Impairment loss,” “Increase (decrease) in provision for bonuses,” 
“Increase (decrease) in provision for product warranties,” “Increase (decrease) in provision for loss on 
construction contracts,” “Increase (decrease) in net defined benefit liability,” “Increase (decrease) in provision 
for loss on litigation,” “Loss (gain) on valuation of derivatives,” “Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates,” 
“Decrease (increase) in lease investment assets" “Decrease (increase) in vehicles and equipment on 
operating leases" "Increase (decrease) in deposits received" which had been listed in separately under “Net 
cash provided by (used in) operating activities,” was included in "Other," in the fiscal year ended March 31, 
2015 . 
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, “Purchase of property, plant and equipment,” “Purchase of intangible 
assets,” which had been listed in separately under “Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities,” was 
included in "Purchase of non-current assets" and "Net decrease (increase) in time deposits" which had been 
included in "Other" was listed in separately in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. 
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, “Repayment of lease obligations,” which had been listed in 
separately under “Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities,” was included in "Other" in the fiscal year 
ended March 31, 2015.   
As a result, in Consolidated Statements of cash Flows for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the following 
items that had been shown separately under “ Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,” were 
reclassified as "Other,". 

“Impairment loss,” ¥35 million   
“Increase (decrease) in provision for bonuses,” ¥2,391 million   
“Increase (decrease) in provision for product warranties,” ¥3,116 million   
“Increase (decrease) in provision for loss on construction contracts,” ¥114 million   
“Increase (decrease) in net defined benefit liability,”( ¥17,692 million)   
“Increase (decrease) in provision for loss on litigation,”(¥369 million)   
“Loss (gain) on valuation of derivatives,” (¥7,414 million)   
“Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates,” (¥320 million)   
“Decrease (increase) in lease investment assets" (¥1,488 million)   
“Decrease (increase) in vehicles and equipment on operating leases" (¥400 million)   
"Increase (decrease) in deposits received" (¥2,240 million)   

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, “Purchase of property, plant and equipment,”(¥67,409 million)   
“Purchase of intangible assets,”(¥5,446 million) which had been listed in separately under “Net cash provided 
by (used in) investing activities,” was included in "Purchase of non-current assets"(¥72,855 million) in the 
fiscal year ended March 31, 2015."Other"(¥7,997 million) was reclassified as "Net decrease (increase) in time 
deposits"(¥7,215 million) and "Other"(¥782 million). 
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, “Repayments of lease obligations,”(¥1,036million) which had been 
listed in separately under “Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities,” was reclassified as "Other" in 
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.   

5 

 
 
3. Other comprehensive income 
Amounts reclassified to net income (loss) in fiscal 2015 and 2014, which were recognized in other 
comprehensive income in the current or previous periods and tax effects for each component of other 
comprehensive income were as follows: 

Millions of yen 

2015 

2014 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

Valuation  difference  on  available-for-sale 
securities 
Increase(decrease) during the year 
Reclassification adjustments   
Sub-total, before tax 

Tax (expense) or benefit 
Sub-total, net of tax 

Foreign currency translation adjustment 
Increase during the year 
Reclassification adjustments   

Sub-total,    before tax 

Tax (expense) or benefit 
Balance at end of year, net of tax 
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans 
Increase(decrease) during the year 
Reclassification adjustments 

Sub-total, before tax 

Tax (expense) or benefit 
Balance at end of year, net of tax 
Remeasurements  of  other  postretirement 
benefits of foreign consolidated   
subsidiaries 
Increase(decrease) during the year 
Reclassification adjustments 
Sub-total, before tax 
Tax (expense) or benefit 
Balance at end of year, net of tax 
Share of other comprehensive income   
of associates accounted for using   
equity method 
Increase during the year 

Total other comprehensive income 

¥10,660 
(953) 
9,707 
(2,350) 
7,357 

37,321 
- 
37,321 
- 
37,321 

1,246 
3,035 
4,281 
(2,011) 
2,270 

(4,642) 
- 
(4,642) 
1,685 
(2,957) 

(¥90,720) 
47,266 
(43,454) 
26,201 
(17,253) 

19,691 
164 
19,855 
- 
19,855 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

$88,634 
(7,924) 
80,710 
(19,539) 
61,171 

310,310 
- 
310,310 
- 
310,310 

10,360 
25,235 
35,595 
(16,721) 
18,874 

(38,596) 
- 
(38,596) 
14,010 
(24,586) 

131 
¥44,122 

170 
¥2,772 

1,089 
$366,858 

6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. Additional Cash Flow Information 
Cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, consisted of the following: 
Millions of yen 

Cash and deposits 
Short-term investment securities 
Short-term loans receivable 

  Sub-total 

Less maturity over three months 
Short-term investment securities excluding 
cash equivalents 
Short-term loans receivable excluding 
repurchase agreement 
Cash and cash equivalents 

2015 
¥228,821 
444,737 
157,070 
830,628 
(25,911) 
(45,562) 

2014 
¥351,125 
233,766 
122,681 
707,572 
(13,756) 
(13,265) 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$1,902,561 
3,697,822 
1,305,978 
6,906,361 
(215,440) 
(378,831) 

(147,070) 

(122,681) 

(1,222,832) 

¥612,085 

¥557,870 

$5,089,258 

7 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. Financial Instruments 
(1) Summary of Financial Instruments Status 
[1] Action Policy with Regard to Financial Instruments 
With regard to planned capital expenditure to support Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., its consolidated subsidiaries 
and affiliated companies (the "FHI Group") in their main operations of automobile manufacturing and sales, 
the FHI Group finances mainly from bank loans and the issue of corporate bonds. Temporary surpluses are 
invested in highly secure financial assets. Bank loans and liquidation of accounts receivable are utilized to 
provide short-term working capital. It is the FHI Group's policy to use derivatives as a way to avoid the risks 
stated below and not to conduct speculative transactions. 

[2] Details of Financial Instruments and Respective Risks 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade and Lease investment assets are subject to customer credit risks. In 
addition, operating receivables denominated in foreign currencies due to globalized business of the FHI 
Group are subject to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates. As a general rule, however, forward 
foreign exchange contracts are utilized to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk, considering the net amount of 
operating receivables denominated in foreign currencies that exceed foreign currency denominated operating 
liabilities. Available-for-sale securities and investment securities are mainly stocks associated with business 
and capital alliances with principal business partners, and are subject to risk of market price fluctuation. 
Majority of payables included in Notes and accounts payable-trade and Electronically recorded 
obligations-operating are due within one year. A certain portion of such liabilities involve foreign currency 
denominated transactions associated with the import of raw materials and is subject to exchange rate 
fluctuation risk, although it is consistently less than accounts receivable balance denominated in the same 
foreign currency. Funds financed by bank loans and corporate bonds are primarily used for capital 
expenditure, whose repayment or redemption dates will come within 9 years after March 31, 2015 at the 
latest. A certain portion of those liabilities may have variable interest rates and are subject to the risk of 
changes in interest rates, although such risk is mitigated using derivative transactions (interest rate swap 
transactions). 
Derivative transactions include foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against exchange rate 
fluctuations associated with trade accounts receivables and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, and 
interest rate swap contracts to hedge against the risk of change in interest rates on bank loans. With regard to 
hedging instruments and hedged items, hedge policy, the method of evaluation of hedge effectiveness and 
other related items, please refer to "2-[15] Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Activities". 

[3] Risk Management System with Regard to Financial Instruments 

(a) Credit Risk management (Risks Associated with Business Partner’s Breach of Contract) 

The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have credit control function and regularly monitor the 
financial status of key customers with regard to accounts receivables and lease investment assets. In 
addition to keeping track of payment due dates and balances of each customer, such credit control 
function identifies and mitigates the potential risk of uncollectibility due to deterioration in financial status 
or other factors of customers. 

(b) Market Risk Management (Risks Associated with Fluctuations in Foreign Exchange and Interest Rates) 
With regard to operating assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, as a general rule, the 
Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against risks of exchange rate fluctuation 
on a monthly basis by each currency. Depending on the status of exchange rates, foreign exchange 
forward contracts with no longer than six months term are used to hedge against the risk of exchange 
rate fluctuation to the extent that net position of accounts receivable and accounts payable dominated in 
foreign currency is exposed. In addition, the Company and certain consolidated subsidiaries use interest 
rate swap transactions to mitigate the risk of fluctuation in interest rates on bank loans and corporate 
bonds.   

8 

 
 
 
The Company also regularly monitors the market values of investments included in Short-term 
investment securities and Investment securities as well as the financial conditions of issuers (business 
partner companies), and continuously reviews its investment portfolio taking into consideration its 
relationships with respective business partner companies.   
Basic policies with regard to derivative transactions are approved by the Executive Management Board. 
Finance & Accounting Department engages in derivative transactions in line with the applicable the 
Company’s rule. The results of these transactions are reported to the Finance Officer every time the 
transactions are conducted. 

(c) Liquidity Risk Management (Risk of Becoming Unable to Make Payments by the Due Date)     

The Company secures liquidity at a level sufficient to satisfy its current needs with commitment lines 
contracted with major banks in combination with keeping cash and cash equivalents balance at a certain 
level. 

[4] Supplemental Explanation of Items with Regard to Fair Value of Financial Instruments 
Fair value of financial instruments includes quoted prices of financial instruments in the market and, in the 
event market prices are not available, prices that are calculated based on the underlying assumptions under 
the appropriate valuation model. Because the factors incorporated into the valuation model are subject to 
change, calculated fair value may differ. The values of derivative transactions contracts stated in "(2) Items 
with Regard to Fair Value of Financial Instruments" do not by themselves indicate the market risk associated 
with the respective derivative transactions. 

9 

 
 
 
(2) Items with Regard to Fair Value of Financial Instruments 
The consolidated balance sheet amounts, the fair value and difference as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 were 
as follows: 
The items whose fair values were extremely difficult to measure were not included in the table below (refer to 
Note [2] ). 
As of March 31, 2015 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Lease investment assets 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term loans receivable 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term investment securities, Investment securities 
and Other securities 

Total Assets 
Notes and accounts payable-trade 
Electronically recorded obligations-operating 
Short-term loans payable 
Current portion of long-term loans payable 
Current portion of bonds 
Accrued income taxes 
Accrued expenses 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

Total Liabilities 

Derivative transactions (*2) 

hedge accounting is not applied 
hedge accounting is applied 

Consolidated 
balance sheet 
amounts 

¥228,821 
164,540 
(640) 
163,900 
24,098 
(66) 
24,032 
157,070 
(341) 
156,729 

118,702 
692,184 
317,801 
74,420 
41,443 
44,329 
- 
54,987 
126,007 
10,000 
115,420 
784,407 

(2,725) 
¥- 

Millions  of  yen 

Fair Value 

Difference 

¥228,821 

163,900 

- 

- 

28,794 

4,762 

158,313 

1,584 

118,702 
698,530 
317,801 
74,420 
41,443 
44,441 
- 
54,987 
126,007 
10,059 
116,074 
785,232 

(2,725) 
¥- 

- 
6,346 
- 
- 
- 
(112) 
- 
- 
- 
(59) 
(654) 
(825) 

- 
¥- 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of March 31, 2015 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Lease investment assets 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term loans receivable 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term investment securities, Investment securities 
and Other securities 

Total Assets 
Notes and accounts payable-trade 
Electronically recorded obligations-operating 
Short-term loans payable 
Current portion of long-term loans payable 
Current portion of bonds 
Accrued income taxes 
Accrued expenses 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

Total Liabilities 

Derivative transactions (*2) 

hedge accounting is not applied 
hedge accounting is applied 

Consolidated 
balance sheet 
amounts 

$1,902,561 
1,368,088 
(5,321) 
1,362,767 
200,366 
(549) 
199,817 
1,305,978 
(2,835) 
1,303,143 

986,963 
5,755,251 
2,642,396 
618,774 
344,583 
368,579 
- 
457,196 
1,047,701 
83,146 
959,674 
6,522,049 

Thousands  of  U.S.  dollars 

Fair Value   

Difference 

$1,902,561 

1,362,767 

$- 

- 

239,411 

39,594 

1,316,313 

13,170 

986,963 
5,808,015 
2,642,396 
618,774 
344,583 
369,510 
- 
457,196 
1,047,701 
83,637 
965,112 
6,528,909 

- 
52,764 
- 
- 
- 
(931) 
- 
- 
- 
(491) 
(5,438) 
(6,860) 

(22,657) 
$- 

(22,657) 
$- 

- 
$- 

*1. Allowance for doubtful accounts corresponding to Notes and accounts receivable-trade, Lease 
investment assets and Short-term loans receivable is deducted.   
*2. Indicated are the net amounts of assets and liabilities results from derivative transactions, with the 
total net liabilities indicated in (    ). 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of March 31, 2014 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Lease investment assets 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term loans receivable 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (*1) 

Short-term investment securities, Investment securities 
and Other securities 

Total Assets 
Notes and accounts payable-trade 
Electronically recorded obligations-operating 
Short-term loans payable 
Current portion of long-term loans payable 
Current portion of bonds 
Accrued income taxes 
Accrued expenses 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

Total Liabilities 

Derivative transactions (*2) 

hedge accounting is not applied 
hedge accounting is applied 

Consolidated 
balance sheet 
amounts 

¥351,125 
181,646 
(275) 
181,371 
23,633 
(44) 
23,589 
122,681 
(397) 
122,284 

84,077 
762,446 
279,926 
67,637 
59,193 
42,557 
4,060 
110,426 
91,921 
10,000 
153,844 
819,564 

(722) 
¥- 

Millions  of  yen 

Fair Value 

Difference 

¥351,125 

181,371 

¥- 

- 

27,792 

4,203 

123,209 

925 

84,077 
767,574 
279,926 
67,637 
59,193 
42,753 
4,085 
110,426 
91,921 
10,091 
154,823 
820,855 

(722) 
¥- 

- 
5,128 
- 
- 
- 
(196) 
(25) 
- 
- 
(91) 
(979) 
(1,291) 

- 
¥- 

*1. Allowance for doubtful accounts corresponding to Notes and accounts receivable-trade, Lease 
investment assets and Short-term loans receivable is deducted.   
*2. Indicated are the net amounts of assets and liabilities results from derivative transactions, with the 
total net liabilities indicated in (    ). 

[1] The calculation methods of financial instrument fair value together with securities and derivative 
transactions 

Assets 
Cash and deposits and Notes and accounts receivable-trade 

Because these are settled in the short-term, the fair value is mostly the same as the book value and 
as such the book value is deemed as fair value. 

Lease investment assets and Short-term loans receivable 

Fair value is the present value calculated by discounting relevant cash flows by each category of the 
assets and timing of cash flow, where discount rates were adopted taking into consideration the 
period until maturity and credit risks. In addition, the estimated residual value is included in the 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
balance of Lease investment assets. 

Short-term investment securities and investment securities 

Fair value is determined by the stock exchange price, while bonds are determined by the stock 
exchange price or by quotations received from financial institutions. Please refer to the note entitled 
"5.Short-term investment securities and investment securities" regarding to respective objectives for 
holding securities. 

Liabilities 
Notes and accounts payable-trade, Short-term loans payable, Accrued income taxes and Accrued 
expenses   

Because these are settled in the short-term, the fair value is mostly the same as the book value and 
as such the book value is deemed as fair value. 

Current portion of long-term loans payable and Long-term loans payable 

Fair value is measured based on the present value that is calculated as discounted cash flow of the 
total amount of principal and interest, where the interest would be set, if the Company concluded a 
brand new loan agreement with the same condition at the date of measurement. 

Current portion of bonds and Bonds payable 

The fair value of bonds issued by the Company is based on market prices if available. For bonds 
with no available market price, fair value is calculated using the present value that is calculated as 
discounted cash flow of the total amount of principal and interest by, where discount rates are 
adopted taking into consideration the remaining redemption period and credit risks. 

Derivative transactions 
Fair value of interest rate swap that meets certain hedging criteria is included in the fair value of 
long-term debt as a hedged item. 

[2] Financial instruments which fair value is extremely difficult to measure 
Consolidated balance sheet amount as of March 31, 2015 and 2014: 

Other securities (available-for-sale securities) 

  Millions of yen 

Certificate of deposit 
Commercial paper 
Money management fund 
Unlisted stocks (excluding over-the-counter stocks) 
Medium Term Note 
Other 

2015 
¥140,000 
144,982 
114,192 
1,015 
30,000 
¥3 

2014 
¥90,000 
79,987 
50,515 
4,832 
- 
¥3 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$1,164,048 
1,205,471 
949,464 
8,439 
249,439 
$25 

These have no available market prices and are expected to entail excessive costs in the estimation of 
future cash flows. Consequently, estimating their fair value is recognized as extremely difficult and they 
are not included in "Short-term investment securities, Investment securities and Other securities". 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[3] Scheduled redemption of monetary assets and securities with maturity 
As of March 31, 2015: 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 
Lease investment assets 
Short-term investment securities, Investment 
securities and Other securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 

Short-term loans receivable 

As of March 31, 2015: 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 
Lease investment assets 
Short-term investment securities, Investment 
securities and Other securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 

Short-term loans receivable 

As of March 31, 2014: 

Cash and deposits 
Notes and accounts receivable-trade 
Lease investment assets 
Short-term investment securities, Investment 
securities and Other securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 

Short-term loans receivable 

Within 1 
Year 
¥228,821 
158,147 
7,002 

1 to 5 
Years 
¥- 
6,393 
16,864 

Millions of yen 
Over 10 
years 
¥- 
- 
- 

5 to 10 
Years 
¥- 
- 
232 

11,186 
3,930 
345,429 
¥58,335 

14,963 
17,001 
1,571 
¥96,412 

2,226 
2,762 
829 
¥2,323 

3,838 
2,392 
4,437 
¥- 

Within 1 
Year 
$1,902,561 
1,314,933 
58,219 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 
Over 10 
years 
$- 
- 
- 

5 to 10 
Years 
$- 
- 
1,929 

1 to 5 
Years 
$- 
53,155 
140,218 

93,007 
32,676 
2,872,113 
$485,034 

124,412 
141,357 
13,062 
$801,630 

18,508 
22,965 
6,893 
$19,315 

31,912 
19,889 
36,892 
$- 

Within 1 
Year 
¥351,125 
174,668 
7,097 

1 to 5 
Years 
¥- 
6,978 
16,303 

Millions of yen 
Over 10 
years 
¥- 
- 
- 

5 to 10 
Years 
¥- 
- 
233 

11,240 
2,024 
169,987 
¥42,364 

8,418 
11,977 
384 
¥77,592 

1,774 
1,329 
454 
¥2,725 

3,290 
732 
2,625 
¥- 

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[4] Amount of repayment for long-term debt and other interest-bearing debt 
As of March 31, 2015: 

Short-term loans payable 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

As of March 31, 2015: 

Short-term loans payable 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

As of March 31, 2014: 

Short-term loans payable 
Bonds payable 
Long-term loans payable 

Within 1 
Year 
¥41,443 
- 
¥44,329 

1 to 5 
Years 
¥- 
10,000 
¥113,022 

Millions of yen 
Over 10 
years 
¥- 
- 
¥- 

5 to 10 
Years 
¥- 
- 
¥2,398 

Within 1 
Year 
$344,583 
- 
$368,579 

1 to 5 
Years 
$- 
83,146 
$939,736 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 
Over 10 
years 
$- 
- 
$- 

5 to 10 
Years 
$- 
- 
$19,938 

Within 1 
Year 
¥59,193 
4,060 
¥42,557 

1 to 5 
Years 
¥- 
10,000 
¥150,028 

Millions of yen 
Over 10 
years 
¥- 
- 
¥- 

5 to 10 
Years 
¥- 
- 
¥3,816 

6. Short-Term Investment Securities and Investment Securities 
Information on the value of short-term investment securities and investment securities as of March 31, 2015 
and 2014 was as follows: 

(1) Other securities (available-for-sale securities): 
As of March 31, 2015: 

Book value exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities   
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 

Other   

Sub-total 

Book value not exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 
Other    

Sub-total 
Total 

Book value 

Acquisition cost 

Millions of yen 
Difference 

¥50,341 

¥24,170 

¥26,171 

20,802 
21,366 
6,139 
98,648 

20,471 
21,067 
6,013 
71,721 

2,778 

2,918 

11,411 
4,719 
- 
1,146 
20,054 
¥118,702 

15 

11,479 
4,768 
- 
1,165 
20,330 
¥92,051 

331 
299 
126 
26,927 

(140) 

(68) 
(49) 
- 
(19) 
(276) 
¥26,651 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of March 31, 2015: 

Book value exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities   
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other   

Sub-total 

Book value not exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 
Other    

Sub-total 
Total 

As of March 31, 2014: 

Book value exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities   
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 

Other   

Sub-total 

Book value not exceeding acquisition cost: 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 
Other    

Sub-total 
Total 

Book value 

Acquisition cost   

Difference 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 

$418,567 

$200,964 

$217,603 

172,961 
177,650 
51,043 
820,221 

170,209 
175,164 
49,996 
596,333 

2,752 
2,486 
1,047 
223,888 

23,098 

24,262 

(1,164) 

94,878 
39,237 
- 
9,529 
166,742 
$986,963 

95,444 
39,644 
- 
9,687 
169,038 
$765,371 

(566) 
(407) 
- 
(158) 
(2,296) 
$221,592 

Book value 

Acquisition cost 

Millions of yen 
Difference 

¥37,854 

¥21,503 

¥16,351 

6,894 
10,014 
2,353 
57,115 

6,798 
9,806 
2,297 
40,404 

1,615 

1,616 

17,829 
6,361 
49 
1,108 
26,962 
¥84,077 

17,990 
6,404 
50 
1,126 
27,186 
¥67,590 

96 
208 
56 
16,711 

(1) 

(161) 
(43) 
(1) 
(18) 
(224) 
¥16,487 

16 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2) Other securities (available-for-sale securities) sold during fiscal years 2015 and 2014: 
For the year ended March 31, 2015: 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 
Other    

Total 

For the year ended March 31, 2015: 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 
Other    

Total 

For the year ended March 31, 2014: 

Sales amount 

Total gains 

Total losses 

Millions of yen 

¥3,300 

¥741 

32,673 
6,626 
1,529 
119 
¥44,247 

190 
116 
5 
- 
¥1,052 

¥12 

50 
17 
20 
- 
¥99 

Sales amount 

Total gains 

Total losses 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 

$27,438 

$6,161 

271,664 
55,093 
12,713 
989 
$367,897 

1,580 
964 
42 
- 
$8,747 

$100 

416 
141 
166 
- 
$823 

Sales amount 

Total gains 

Total losses 

Millions of yen 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 

Government and municipal bonds 
Corporate bonds 
Other 

Total 

¥49,172 

¥47,148 

23,566 
9,902 
1,972 
¥84,612 

127 
50 
8 
¥47,333 

¥2 

133 
21 
14 
¥170 

17 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7. Short-Term Loans Payable and Long-Term Debts 
Short-term loans payable as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, consisted of the following: 

Millions of yen 
2014 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

2015 

Bank loans with average interest rate of 1.49% and 0.43% 
per annum as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively 

¥41,443 

¥59,193 

$344,583 

Long-term debts as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following: 

Loans principally from banks and insurance companies due 
through 2025 with average interest rate of 0.82% and 
0.93% per annum as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, 
respectively 

Unsecured 0.71% bonds due June 13, 2016 

Subtotal 

Less-Portion due within one year 

Total 

Millions of yen 
2014 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

2015 

¥159,749 

¥196,401 

$1,328,253 

10,000 
169,749 
(44,329) 
¥125,420 

10,000 
210,461 
(46,617) 
¥163,844 

83,146 
1,411,399 
(368,579) 
$1,042,820 

Annual maturities of long-term loans payable and bonds payable as of March 31, 2015 were as follows: 

2016 
2017 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 and thereafter 

Total 

Millions of yen 
¥44,329 
41,496 
43,798 
36,038 
1,690 
2,398 
¥169,749 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
$368,579 
345,024 
364,164 
299,642 
14,052 
19,938 
$1,411,399 

18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lease obligations as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following: 

Lease obligations due within one year as of March 31,2015 

and 2014 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥882 

2015 
¥1,016 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$8,448 

Lease obligations due after one year as of March 31,2015 
  and 2014 
Total 

1,065 

1,099 

8,855 

¥2,081 

¥1,981 

$17,303 

Annual maturities of lease obligations as of March 31, 2015 were as follows: 

2016 
2017 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 and thereafter 

Total 

Millions of yen 
¥1,016 
903 
114 
39 
9 
- 
¥2,081 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
$8,448 
7,508 
948 
324 
75 
- 
$17,303 

The following assets as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 were pledged as collateral for certain loans: 

Property, plant and equipment 

Total 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥41,358 
¥41,358 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$294,629 
$294,629 

2015 
¥35,435 
¥35,435 

To raise working capital efficiently, the FHI Group has entered into the commitment-line contracts. The 
maximum amount that can be made available under these contracts is ¥127,041 million (US$1,056,298 
thousand) as of March 31, 2015. At the end of the fiscal year under review, there were no borrowings under 
the commitment line. 

19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. Derivative transactions 
In the normal course of business, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries employ derivative financial 
instruments, including foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign currency options and interest rate swaps, 
to manage their exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The 
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries do not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. 
The fair value information of derivative financial instruments as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows: 

Derivative transactions to which hedge accounting is not applied 
(1) Foreign currency contracts: 
As of March 31, 2015 

Notional 
Amount 

Millions of yen 
Valuation 
Fair value  gain (loss) 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 
Valuation 
Fair value  gain (loss) 

Notional 
Amount 

Foreign exchange 
forward contracts: 

Sell- 

U.S. dollar 

              Euro 
              Canadian dollar 

As of March 31, 2014 

¥313,502 
4,488 
23,102 

(¥2,955) 
55 
175 

(¥2,955)  $2,606,652 
37,316 
192,084 

55 
175 

($24,570) 
457 
1,455 

($24,570) 
457 
1,455 

Foreign exchange forward contracts: 

Sell- 

U.S. dollar 

              Euro 
              Canadian dollar 

Notional 
Amount 

Fair value 

Millions of yen 
Valuation 
gain (loss) 

¥218,776 
6,134 
20,782 

(¥686) 
(36) 
0 

(¥686) 
(36) 
0 

Note: The method to determine the fair value is based on quotations obtained from financial institutions. 

Derivative transactions to which hedge accounting is applied 
(1) Interest rate contracts: 
Accounting treatment: Exception processing of interest rate swap 
Hedge item: Long-term loans payable 

As of March 31, 2015 

Interest rate swap 
contracts: 
Receive floating rate 
pay fixed rate 

Millions of yen 

Thousands of U.S. dollars 

Notional 
Amount 

Over 
1  year 

Fair value 

Notional 
Amount 

Over 
1 year 

Fair value 

¥10,105 

¥3,000 

(*) 

$84,019 

$24,944 

(*) 

20 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of March 31, 2014 

Interest rate swap contracts: 
Receive floating rate pay fixed rate 

Millions of yen 

Notional 
Amount 

Over 
1  year 

Fair value 

Note *Fair value of interest rate swap that meets certain hedging criteria is included in the fair value of 
long-term debt as a hedged item. 

¥23,395 

¥10,105 

(*) 

9. Property, Plant and Equipment 
Property, plant and equipment as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 are summarized as follows: 

Buildings and structures 
Machinery, equipment and vehicles 
Vehicles and equipment on operating leases, net 
Other 
    Subtotal 
Accumulated depreciation 
Accumulated impairment loss 
Land 
Construction in progress 

Total 

2015 
¥348,685 
526,302 
13,181 
318,806 
1,206,974 
(882,752) 
(26,528) 
188,392 
28,611 
¥514,697 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥327,549 
485,990 
14,666 
265,699 
1,093,904 
(817,421) 
(27,717) 
187,931 
24,116 
¥460,813 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$2,899,185 
4,376,004 
109,595 
2,650,752 
10,035,536 
(7,339,752) 
(220,570) 
1,566,409 
237,890 
$4,279,513 

10. Unexecuted Balance of Overdraft Facilities and Lending Commitments 
The unexecuted balance of overdraft facilities and lending commitments at a consolidated subsidiary (Subaru 
Finance Co., Ltd.) as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows: 

Total overdraft facilities and lending commitments 
Less amounts currently executed 
Unexecuted balance 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥4,150 
569 
¥3,581 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$39,910 
4,132 
$35,778 

2015 
¥4,800 
497 
¥4,303 

A portion of the overdraft facilities and lending commitments above is subject to credit considerations as 
documented in the customer contracts. Therefore, the total balance above is not always available. 

21 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. Pension and Severance Plans 
The Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries have lump-sum retirement payment plans, 
contributory defined benefit employees’ welfare pension funds, defined benefit pension plan, and certain 
domestic subsidiaries have defined contribution pension plans. In addition, in certain occasions, additional 
retirement payments are made to employees for their retirement. Consolidated foreign subsidiaries primarily 
have defined contribution plans. 
As of March 31, 2015, the Company and 53 of its consolidated domestic subsidiaries, which add up to a total 
of 54 companies, have lump-sum retirement payment plans. Within the FHI Group, there are also 20 defined 
contribution plans, and 5 defined benefits pension plans. In addition, there are 7 single-employer employees’ 
welfare pension funds subject to the provisions of Article 33 of "Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits." 
Certain insignificant consolidated subsidiaries calculated their pension liability using the simplified method. 
Under the simplified method, an accrued pension and net defined benefit liability is provided at the amount 
that would have been payable had all the employees voluntarily retired at the end of the fiscal year, less an 
amount to be covered from the plan assets, while the Company and significant subsidiaries provide an 
accrued pension and net defined benefit liability based on the estimated amount of pension and severance 
obligation (projected benefit obligations), less the fair value of plan assets at the end of the fiscal year under 
the actuarial method. 

Defined benefit pension plans (including the multi-employer pension plan of contributory defined benefit 
employees’ welfare pension funds settled as defined benefit pension plan.)   

Movement in retirement benefit obligation, except plans applied simplified method 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥101,700         

- 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$854,901 
(20,629) 

Balance at the beginning of the period 
Cumulative effects of 
changes in accounting policies 
Restated balance 
a. Service cost 
b. Interest cost 
c. Actuarial loss (gain) 

d. Benefits paid 
e. Other 
Balance at the end of the period 

2015 
¥102,819 
(2,481) 

100,338 
5,508 
1,397 
4,520 

(4,366) 
- 
¥107,397 

101,700 
5,565 
1,173 
(1,569) 

(4,049) 
(1) 
¥102,819 

Movements in plan assets, except plans applied simplified method 

Balance at the beginning of the period 
a. Expected return on plan assets 
b. Actuarial loss (gain) 
c. Contributions paid by the employer 
d. Benefits paid 
Balance at the end of the period 

2015 
¥87,069 
1,913 
4,961 
8,330 
(3,133) 
¥99,140 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥66,714 
1,697 
(1,628) 
23,029 
(2,743) 
¥87,069 

Movement in net defined benefit liability in the plans applying the simplified method 

22 

834,273 
45,797 
11,616 
37,582 

(36,302) 
- 
$892,996 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$723,946 
15,906 
41,249 
69,261 
(26,050) 
$824,312 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
Balance at the beginning of the period 
a. Increase due to the change of scope of 
consolidation 
b. Retirement benefit cost 
c. Benefits paid 
d. Contributions paid by the employer 
Balance at the end of the period 

2015 
¥5,880 
- 

703 
(482) 
(29) 
¥6,072 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥5,399 
203 

720 
(417) 
(25) 
¥5,880 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
¥48,890 
- 

5,845 
(4,008) 
(241) 
$50,486 

Reconciliation from retirement benefit obligations and plan assets to net defined benefit liability (asset), 
include plans applied simplified method 

a. Funded retirement benefit obligations 
b. Plan assets 
    Sub total 
c. Unfunded retirement benefit 
obligations 
a+b+c. Total Net liability (asset) for 
retirement benefits   
d. Net defined benefit liability 
e. Net defined benefit asset 
d+e. Total Net liability (asset) for 
retirement benefits   

Retirement benefit costs 

a. Service cost 
b. Interest cost 
c. Expected return on plan assets 
d. Net actuarial loss amortization 
e. Past service costs amortization 
f. Additional retirement payments   
g. Retirement benefit cost of the plan 
applying the simplified method 
Total retirement benefit costs for the fiscal 
year ended 

2015 
¥97,944 
(99,346) 
(1,402) 
15,706 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥93,446 
(87,248) 
6,198 
15,432 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$814,368 
(826,025) 
(11,657) 
130,590 

14,304 

21,630 

118,932 

17,963 
(3,659) 
¥14,304 

22,852 
(1,222) 
¥21,630 

149,356 
(30,423) 
$118,932 

2015 
¥5,508 
1,397 
(1,913) 
2,377 
58 
379 
703 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥5,565 
1,173 
(1,697) 
2,429 
42 
311 
720 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
¥45,797 
11,616 
(15,906) 
19,764 
482 
3,151 
5,845 

¥8,509 

¥8,543 

¥70,749 

23 

 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjustments for retirement benefit (before tax effect)     

a. Past service costs 
b. Actuarial gains and losses 
Total   

2015 
¥249 
4,032 
¥4,281 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥ - 
- 
¥ - 

Accumulated adjustments for retirement benefit (before tax effect)   

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$2,070 
33,525 
$35,595 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$1,280 

2015 
¥154 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥403 

16,813 

20,845 

139,794 

¥16,967 

¥21,248 

$141,074 

2015 
51% 
14% 
25% 
10% 
100% 

Percentage 
2014 
54% 
13% 
23% 
10% 
100% 

a. Past service costs that are yet to be 
recognized 
b. Actuarial gains and losses that are yet 
to be recognized 
Total   

Plan assets 

Plan assets comprise: 

a.Bonds 
b.Equity securities 
c.Cash and deposit 
d.Other 
Total 

Long-term expected rate of return 
Current and target asset allocations, historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets have 
been considered in determining the long-term expected rate of return.   

Actuarial assumptions 
The principal actuarial assumptions   

2015 

2014 

a. Attribution of expected benefit obligation  Benefit formula method 
b. Discount rate 
c. Long-term expected rate of return   
d. Amortization of actuarial gain/loss 

0.8%–1.4% 
1.4%–3.5% 
Primarily 16 years (amortized 
by the straight-line method 
starting from the following 
fiscal year, over a period 
shorter than the average 
remaining service periods of 
the eligible employees) 
10 to 19 years 

The straight-line method 
0.6%–1.5% 
1.4%–3.5% 
Primarily 16 years (amortized 
by the straight-line method 
starting from the following 
fiscal year, over a period 
shorter than the average 
remaining service periods of 
the eligible employees) 
10 to 19 years 

e. Amortization of past service cost 

24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Defined contribution pension plan 

The amount required to contribute to defined contribution plans was 4,414 million (US$36,701 thousand) and 
4,127 million for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 respectively which included the multi-employer pension plan of 
contributory defined benefit employees’ welfare pension funds settled as defined contribution plans. 

Certain information concerning the multi-employer pension plan, which requires contributions that are 
expensed as they become due as pension and severance costs, was as follows: 
(1) Overall funded status of the multi-employer pension plan (mainly as of March 31, 2015 and 2014) 

Plan assets 
Projected benefit obligation 
Funded status 

2015 
¥83,089 
94,207 
(¥11,118) 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥91,753 
100,556 
(¥8,803) 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$690,854 
783,296 
($92,442) 

(2) Contributions by the Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries as a percentage of total 
contributions to the multi-employer pension plan for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 respectively: 5% 

Other than the above, ¥27,203 million (US$226,183 thousand) and ¥17,403 million of postretirement benefit 
plan obligation for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 respectively is included in "Other" of accrued expense and 
long-term liabilities in some American subsidiaries.       

12. Income Taxes 
The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries were subject to a number of taxes based on income, which in 
the aggregate resulted in a normal statutory income tax rate of approximately 35.4% and 37.8% for fiscal 
years 2015 and 2014, respectively. 
A reconciliation of the statutory income tax rates in Japan to the Company’s effective income tax rates for 
fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 

2015 
35.4% 

2014 
- 

Statutory income tax rate in Japan 
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from: 
Adjustment of deferred tax assets in the end of fiscal year 2015 by change of the tax rate 
Deduction of research and development expense 
Entertainment expenses not qualifying for deduction 
Changes in valuation allowance and tax benefits realized from loss carry forwards 
Adjustment to past corporate income taxes payable and corporate income taxes refundable 
Equity in earnings of affiliates 
Difference of applicable tax rate in subsidiaries 
Other 
Effective income tax rate 
Note:The note for fiscal year 2014 is omitted because the difference between the statutory income tax   
          rates in Japan and the Company’s effective income tax is 5% or less of the statutory income tax rates.     

0.7% 
(3.6)% 
0.1% 
(0.5)% 
0.2% 
0.1% 
35.4% 
0.3% 
32.4% 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, were as 
follows: 

Deferred tax assets: 
Accrued expenses 
Provision for product warranties 
Net defined benefit liability 
Depreciation and amortization expenses 
Long-term accounts payable-other 
Provision for bonuses 
Unrealized profit on inventories 
Loss on valuation of inventories 
Net operating loss carryforwards 
Other 

Total deferred tax assets 

Valuation allowance 

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance 

Deferred tax liabilities: 

Valuation difference on available-for-sale securities 
Depreciation and amortization expenses 
Reserve for reduction entry 
Net defined benefit asset 
Other 

Total deferred tax liabilities 
Net deferred tax assets 

Millions of yen 
2014 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

2015 

¥18,569 
17,549 
13,534 
10,938 
10,919 
7,241 
25,954 
2,079 
860 
31,253 
138,896 
(20,018) 
118,878 

(8,668) 
(11,246) 
(2,072) 
(1,006) 
(17,980) 
(40,972) 
¥77,906 

¥15,409 
13,804 
15,077 
10,559 
7,069 
7,265 
15,894 
2,011 
1,274 
32,574 
120,936 
(23,669) 
97,267 

(5,822) 
(4,821) 
(2,389) 
(441) 
(11,075) 
(24,548) 
¥72,719 

$154,394 
145,913 
112,530 
90,945 
90,787 
60,206 
215,798 
17,286 
7,151 
259,857 
1,154,868 
(166,442) 
988,426 

(72,071) 
(93,506) 
(17,228) 
(8,365) 
(149,497) 
(340,667) 
$647,759 

The net deferred tax assets are included in the following line items in the accompanying consolidated balance 
sheets. 

Current assets—Deferred tax assets 
Investments and other assets—Deferred tax assets 
Current liabilities—Deferred tax liabilities 
(Other current liabilities) 
Long-term liabilities—Deferred tax liabilities 

Total net deferred tax assets 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥64,214 
18,332 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$655,101 
109,030 

- 
(9,827) 
¥72,719 

- 
(116,371) 
$647,759 

2015 
¥78,789 
13,113 

- 
(13,996) 
¥77,906 

26 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Adjustment of deferred tax assets and liabilities for enacted changes in tax laws and rates) 
(Fiscal 2014) 
On March 31, 2014, amendments to the Japanese tax regulations were enacted into law, and the statutory 
income tax rate for years beginning on or after April 1, 2014 will be changed. As a result of these amendments, 
the statutory income tax rates utilized for the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities expected to be 
settled for years beginning on April 1, 2014 has been changed from 37.8% to 35.4%. 
Due to these changes in statutory income tax rates, net deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2014 decreased 
by ¥1,861million and deferred income tax expense recognized for the year ended March 31, 2014 increased 
by the same amount. 

(Fiscal 2015) 
On  March  31,  2015,  amendments  to  the  Japanese  tax  regulations  were  enacted  into  law.  Based  on  the 
amendments, the statutory income tax rates utilized for the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities 
expected to be settled or  realized from April 1, 2015  to  March 31, 2016 and on or after April  1, 2016 are 
changed from 35.4% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to 32.9% and 32.1%, respectively, as of March 
31, 2015.   
Due to these changes in statutory income tax rates, net deferred tax assets (after deducting the deferred tax 
liabilities) decreased by  ¥2,375  million  (US$19,747 thousand) as of  March 31, 2015, deferred  income  tax 
expense  recognized  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  March  31,  2015  increased  by  ¥2,826  million  (US$23,497 
thousand),  evaluation  differences  of  other  securities  increased  by  ¥765  million  (US$6,361  thousand)  and 
accumulated  adjustments  for  employee  retirement  benefits  increased  by  minous  ¥529  million  (minous 
US$4,398 thousand). 

13. Net Assets 
Under Japanese laws and regulations, the entire amount paid for new shares is required to be designated as 
common stock. However, a company may, by a resolution of its Board of Directors, designate an amount not 
exceeding one half of the price of the new shares as additional paid-in capital, which is included in capital 
surplus. 
Under the Japanese Companies Act (“the Act”), in cases where a dividend distribution of surplus is made, the 
smaller of an amount equal to 10% of the dividend or the excess, if any, of 25% of common stock over the 
total of additional paid-in capital and legal earnings reserve must be set aside as additional paid-in capital or 
legal earnings reserve. Legal earnings reserve is included in retained earnings in the accompanying 
consolidated balance sheets. 
Under the Act, both legal earnings reserve and additional paid-in capital used to eliminate or reduce a deficit 
generally require a resolution of the shareholders’ meeting. 
Additional paid-in capital and legal earnings reserve may not be distributed as dividends. Under the Act, all 
additional paid-in capital and all legal earnings reserve may be transferred to other capital surplus and 
retained earnings, respectively, which are potentially available for dividends. 
The maximum amount that the Company can distribute as dividends is calculated based on the 
non-consolidated financial statements of the Company in accordance with the Act. 
At the annual shareholders’ meeting held on June 23, 2015, the shareholders approved cash dividends 
amounting to ¥28,889 million (US$240,201 thousand). Such appropriations have not been accrued in the 
consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2015. Such appropriations are recognized in the period in 
which they are approved by the shareholders. 

14. Presentation of inventories and provision for loss on construction contracts   
¥Minus 988 million (US$ Minus 8,215 thousand) and ¥70 million as "Provision for loss on construction 
contracts" is included in "Cost of sales" for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. 

27 

 
 
 
 
 
15. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following: 

Freightage and packing expenses 
Advertising expenses 
Sales incentives 
Salaries and bonuses 
Research and development expenses 
Other 

Total 

  Millions of yen 
2014 
¥26,523 
64,332 
65,425 
50,274 
59,896 
86,919 
¥353,369 

2015 
¥34,856 
81,538 
82,597 
49,894 
83,104 
105,389 
¥437,378 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$289,815 
677,958 
686,763 
414,850 
690,979 
876,270 
$3,636,634 

16. Gain on sales of investment securities 
(Fiscal 2014) 
Gain  on  sales  of  investment  securities  includes  ¥47,118  million,  the  profit  related  to  the  sales  of  stock  of 
Polaris Industries Inc. owned by FHI. 

17. Allowances for doubtful accounts 
(Fiscal 2014) 
Allowances for doubtful accounts, the loss is associated with initial investment fees related to the AH-64D 
combat helicopter for the Japan Ministry of Defense as a precaution for the case that the ruling is upheld. 

18. Finance Leases 
As allowed under the Japanese accounting standards, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in 
Japan account for finance leases. 

Information as Lessee 
(1) Transfer of title through finance lease transaction   
[1] Leased assets 
Mainly implements of production in the automotive business 
[2] Depreciation method for leased assets 
Leased assets are depreciated by the same method as used for other property, plant and equipment.   

(2) Finance leases which do not transfer ownership title 
[1] Leased assets 
Mainly network equipment and terminal units (Other tangible assets) in the automotive business 
[2] Depreciation method for leased assets 
Leased assets are depreciated by the straight-line method over the leased period and the residual value is 
zero. 

28 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Information as Lessor 
(1) The details of lease investment assets as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 

Obligation of lease fee receivable 
Estimated residual value 
Interest expense portion 
Lease investment assets 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥28,363 
322 
(5,052) 
¥23,633 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$239,145 
2,844 
(41,623) 
$200,366 

2015 
¥28,762 
342 
(5,006) 
¥24,098 

(2) Lease revenue related to lease investment assets 
Amounts of collections on lease receivable after the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were as 
follows; 

Within 1 year 
1 to 2 years 
2 to 3 years 
3 to 4 years 
4 to 5 years 
Over 5 years 

Millions of yen 
2014 
¥8,510 
6,924 
5,510 
4,276 
2,840 
¥303 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 
$69,835 
58,743 
49,464 
35,528 
23,223 
$2,353 

2015 
¥8,399 
7,065 
5,949 
4,273 
2,793 
¥283 

29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19. Operating Lease 
Information as Lessee 
The future minimum lease/rent payments, excluding the portion of interest thereon, as of March 31, 2015 and 
2014, were as follows: 

Operating leases: 

Due within one year 
Due after one year 

Total 

Millions of yen 
2014 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥2,130 
12,241 
¥14,371 

$20,279 
116,654 
$136,934 

2015 

¥2,439 
14,030 
¥16,469 

Information as Lessor 
The future minimum lease/rent payments receivable, excluding the portion of interest thereon, as of March 31, 
2015 and 2014, were as follows: 

Operating leases: 

Due within one year 
Due after one year 

Total 

20. Contingent Liabilities 
Contingent liabilities as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, were as follows: 

Millions of yen 
2014 

  Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥212 
101 
¥313 

$1,580 
765 
$2,345 

2015 

¥190 
92 
¥282 

  Thousands of 
Millions  of  yen  U.S. dollars 
2015 

2014 

2015 

As guarantor of third-party indebtedness from financial 

institutions 

¥45,214 

¥40,284 

$375,937 

21. The Amount of Discount of Export Bill 
The amount of discount of export bill as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, were as follows: 

The amount of discount of export bill 

  Thousands of 
Millions  of  yen  U.S. dollars 
2015 
$24,345 

2014 
¥812 

2015 
¥2,928 

22. Transfer of Financial Assets to Special Purpose Company 
The balance of financial assets transferred to special purpose company as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, were 
as follows: 

Balance of financial assets transferred to special purpose 
company(loan receivable of Automobiles and accounts 
receivable-trade of Aerospace) 

30 

  Thousands of 
Millions  of  yen  U.S. dollars 
2015 

2014 

2015 

¥5,037 

¥7,073 

$41,881 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23. Fair value of collateral financial assets with free disposal right 

Collateral investment securities 

  Thousands of 
Millions  of  yen  U.S. dollars 
2015 
$83,146 

2014 
- 

2015 
¥10,000 

The above relates transaction with repurchase agreement and the same amount is included in short-term 
loans receivable of current assets. 

24. Segment Information 
(1)General information about reportable segments 
The business segments the Company reports are the business units for which the Company is able to obtain 
respective financial information separately in order for the Board of Directors to conduct periodic investigation to 
determine distribution of management resources and evaluate their business result. 
  The Company places Automobile at the center of the whole businesses, and introduces an internal company 
system into Aerospace and Industrial products divisions. This framework makes clearer the responsibility of each 
division  and  accelerates  business  execution.  The  Company  manages  the  subsidiaries  on  the  basis  of  this 
classification. Therefore, the business segments consist of Automobile, Aerospace, Industrial products, and Other 
which does not belong to any division. 
  Automobile segment manufactures and sells vehicles and related products. Aerospace segment manufactures 
aircrafts, parts of space-related devices. Industrial products segment manufactures and sells Robin engines and 
related products. 

(2)Calculation method of sales, profit or loss, assets, liabilities and other items by reportable segments 
Accounting method for reportable segments is almost the same as "2. Summary of Significant 
Accounting Policies". 

Segment income are calculated based on operating income. 
Net sales - Inter-segment are calculated based on current market prices. 

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
(3)Information on sales, income, assets and other items by reportable segments for the fiscal years ended 
March 31, 2015 and 2014 was summarized as follows 

Net Sales: 
Automobiles 

Outside customers 
Inter-segment 
Sub-total 

Aerospace 

Outside customers 
Inter-segment 
Sub-total     
Industrial products 

Outside customers 
Inter-segment 
Sub-total     

Other (*1) 

Outside customers 
Inter-segment 
Sub-total 
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 

Segment income: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other (*1) 
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 

Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥2,698,974 
4,236 
2,703,210 

¥2,246,624 
3,261 
2,249,885 

$22,440,958 
35,221 
22,476,179 

142,801 
- 
142,801 

29,029 
207 
29,236 

124,436 
- 
124,436 

29,776 
567 
30,343 

7,109 
15,744 
22,853 
2,898,100 
(20,187) 
¥2,877,913 

7,293 
14,642 
21,935 
2,426,599 
(18,470) 
¥2,408,129 

Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

¥400,874 
18,912 
779 
1,884 
422,449 
596 
¥423,045 

¥308,973 
14,148 
632 
2,099 
325,852 
637 
¥326,489 

1,187,337 
- 
1,187,337 

241,365 
1,721 
243,086 

59,109 
130,905 
190,014 
24,096,616 
(167,847) 
$23,928,769 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

$3,333,117 
157,246 
6,477 
15,665 
3,512,505 
4,956 
$3,517,461 

32 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Segment assets: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other (*1)   
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 

Other Items: 
Depreciation and amortization: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other (*1) 
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 

Investment to equity-method affiliates: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other (*1) 
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 
Increase of property, plant and equipment and 
intangible fixed assets: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other (*1) 
Total 
Adjustment (*2) 
Consolidated total (*3) 

Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

¥1,944,178 
186,292 
32,926 
59,735 
2,223,131 
(23,417) 
¥2,199,714 

¥1,639,760 
182,123 
29,692 
53,533 
1,905,108 
(16,745) 
¥1,888,363 

Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

¥65,342 
4,583 
429 
1,467 
71,821 
- 
¥71,821 

¥589 
- 
775 
- 
1,364 
- 
¥1,364 

¥122,689 
4,509 
985 
7,163 
135,346 
- 
¥135,346 

¥56,265 
3,758 
411 
1,052 
61,486 
- 
¥61,486 

¥6 
- 
520 
- 
526 
- 
¥526 

¥90,782 
4,074 
533 
3,148 
98,537 
- 
¥98,537 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

$16,165,112 
1,548,948 
273,767 
496,674 
18,484,502 
(194,703) 
$18,289,798 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

$543,294 
38,106 
3,567 
12,198 
597,165 
- 
$597,165 

$4,897 
- 
6,444 
- 
11,341 
- 
$11,341 

$1,020,113 
37,491 
8,190 
59,558 
1,125,351 
- 
$1,125,351 

Note: *1. "Other" means the category which is not included into any reportable segments. It consists of 

garbage collection vehicles, specialized vehicles, real estate lease, etc. 

*2. Adjustment of segment income refers to elimination of intersegment transaction. 
*3.Segment income is adjusted on operating income on the consolidated statements of income. 

33 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Related Information 
(1)Products and services information 
Products and services information is not shown since the same information is in the segment information. 

(2)Information about geographic areas 
[1]Sales for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was summarized as follows: 

Sales: (*1) 
Japan 
North America 

[United States] (*2) 

Europe 
Asia 
Other 

Consolidated total 

  Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

¥652,894 
1,730,947 
[1,607,897] 
123,250 
238,749 
132,073 
¥2,877,913 

¥672,060 
1,322,760 
[1,220,961] 
134,680 
154,392 
124,237 
¥2,408,129 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

$5,428,569 
14,392,176 
[13,369,061] 
1,024,778 
1,985,109 
1,098,138 
$23,928,769 

Note: *1 Sales is categorized by country or area which is based on customer location. 

*2 Sales of the United States is included in North America area. 

[2]Property, plant and equipment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was summarized as 
follows: 

Property, plant and equipment: (*1) 

Japan 
North America 

[United States] (*2) 

Europe 
Asia 
Other 

Consolidated total 

  Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥412,623 
101,042 
[100,274] 
481 
- 
551 
¥514,697 

¥394,163 
65,987 
[65,233] 
486 
- 
177 
¥460,813 

$3,430,806 
840,126 
[833,741] 
3,999 
- 
4,581 
$4,279,513 

Note: *1 Property, plant and equipment is categorized by country or area according to geographic adjacent 

level. 

*2 Property, plant and equipment of the United States is included in North America area. 

[3]Major customers Information 
Information about major customers is not shown because outside sales for major customers accounted for 
less 10% of operating revenue on the consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
2015 and 2014. 

34 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Information on Impairment Loss in Fixed Assets by Reportable segments 
Impairment loss in fixed assets by reportable segments for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 
was summarized as follows: 

Impairment loss in fixed assets: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other 

Total 

Adjustment 
Total 

Millions of yen 
2014 

2015 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥38 
- 
- 
- 
38 
- 
¥38 

¥35 
- 
- 
- 
35 
- 
¥35 

$316 
- 
- 
- 
316 
- 
$316 

Information on Amortization of Goodwill and Unamortized Balance by Reportable segments 
Information on amortization of goodwill and unamortized balance by reportable segments for the fiscal years 
ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was summarized as follows: 
Goodwill 

Millions of yen 
2014 

Thousands of 
U.S. dollars 
2015 

¥258 
- 
- 
- 
258 
- 
¥258 

¥2,369 
- 
- 
- 
2,369 
- 
¥2,369 

$2,212 
- 
- 
- 
2,212 
- 
¥2,212 

$20,554 
- 
- 
- 
20,554 
- 
$20,554 

2015 

¥266 
- 
- 
- 
266 
- 
¥266 

¥2,472 
- 
- 
- 
2,472 
- 
¥2,472 

Amount written off of current period: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other   
Total 

Corporate and elimination 
Total 

Balance at the end of current period: 

Automobiles 
Aerospace 
Industrial products 
Other   
Total 

Corporate and elimination 
Total 

Information on Negative Goodwill by Reportable segments 
No items to be reported. 

35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25. Fair Value of Investment and Rental Property 
The Company and certain consolidated subsidiaries own rental office buildings and rental commercial 
facilities with the objective of generating rental income in Saitama prefecture and other locations. Certain 
domestic rental office buildings in Japan are classified as properties that include portions used as investment 
and rental property, because part of them are used by the Company and certain consolidated subsidiaries.   
The consolidated balance sheet amounts, principal changes during fiscal 2015 and 2014, fair value at the 

end of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 
As of March 31, 2015 

beginning 
balance 

Consolidated balance sheet amounts 
Increase(dec
rease) during 
the year 

ending 
balance 

Millions  of  yen 

Fair value as 
the end of the 
fiscal year 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

As of March 31, 2015 

¥30,343 

(¥1,095) 

¥29,248 

¥37,704 

¥9,206 

¥6,022 

¥15,228 

¥19,537 

Thousands  of  U.S.  dollars 

beginning 
balance 

Consolidated balance sheet amounts 
Increase(dec
rease) during 
the year 

ending 
balance 

Fair value as 
the end of the 
fiscal year 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

As of March 31, 2014 

$252,291 

($9,105) 

$243,186 

$313,495 

$76,544 

$50,071 

$126,615 

$162,443 

beginning 
balance 

Consolidated balance sheet amounts 
Increase(dec
rease) during 
the year 

ending 
balance 

Millions  of  yen 

Fair value as 
the end of the 
fiscal year 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

¥30,410 

(¥67) 

¥30,343 

¥36,779 

¥6,830 

¥2,376 

¥9,206 

¥13,569 

Note 1. The amounts of consolidated balance sheet excludes accumulated depreciation and accumulated 

impairment loss from acquisition costs. 
2. Among changes in the amount of investment, rental property and properties that include portions 
used as investment and rental property during the fiscal 2015, principal increases were properties 
acquisitions etc, which amounted to ¥7,263 million (US$60,389 thousand), and principal decreases 
were depreciation, which amounted to ¥1,009 million (US$8,389 thousand), loss on sales and 
retirement, which amounted to ¥1,408 million (US$11,707 thousand). 
  Among changes in the amount of investment, rental property and properties that include portions 
used as investment and rental property during the fiscal 2014, principal increases were properties 
acquisitions etc, which amounted to ¥3,370 million, and principal decreases were depreciation, which 
amounted to ¥612 million, loss on sales and retirement, which amounted to ¥450 million.   

36 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3. Fair value of a part of main investment and rental property is the amount estimated by based value of 
real-estate appraiser, and fair value of a part of other investment and rental property is the amount 
estimated by the Company based principally on land assessment value. 

Profit and loss in fiscal 2015 and 2014 concerning investment and rental property and properties that include 
portions used as investment and rental property were as follows: 
As of March 31, 2015 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

As of March 31, 2015 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

As of March 31, 2014 

Rental 
income 

Rental 
expenses 

Change 

Millions  of  yen 
Other profit 
and loss 

¥3,868 

¥2,167 

¥1,701 

(¥418) 

¥394 

¥1,265 

(¥871) 

¥- 

Thousands  of  U.S.  dollars 

Rental 
income 

Rental 
expenses 

Change 

Other profit 
and loss 

$32,161 

$18,018 

$14,143 

($3,476) 

$3,276 

$10,518 

($7,242) 

$- 

Rental 
income 

Rental 
expenses 

Change 

Millions  of  yen 
Other profit 
and loss 

Investment and rental property 
Properties that include portions used as 
investment and rental property 

¥3,476 

¥2,074 

¥1,402 

¥392 

¥221 

¥171 

¥44 

¥- 

Note:1. Rental income (from the properties that include portions used as investment and rental property) does 

not include the portion that the Company or certain subsidiaries use as the provision of services and 
business administration purposes. Rental expenses, however, include all portions of the expenses 
(costs related to depreciation, repairs, insurance and taxes). 
2. Other profit and loss include in gain on sale and impairment loss. 

26.Subsequent Event 
None identified. 

27.Other 
On January 15, 2010, the Company filed a lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court against the Government of 
Japan for the payment totaling ¥35,124 million (US$ 292,043 thousand) of uncollected initial investment fees 
(amount paid for customization to the Japanese specifications) for the manufacture of the AH-64D combat 
helicopters for the Japan Ministry of Defense. On February 28, 2014, the Tokyo District Court rejected the 
case. On March 13, 2014, the Company appealed against the Tokyo District Court’s decision to the Tokyo 
High Court. 
On January 29, 2015, the Tokyo High Court upheld the Company’s claims in almost all respects. However, 
the Government of Japan filed a petition of objection to the Supreme Court of Japan on February 10, 2015.   

37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On April 6, 2015, the Company made an additional appeal to the Supreme Court of Japan in order to have the 
Company’s claims rejected at the Tokyo High Court upheld.   

38