More annual reports from Synlait Milk Limited:
2023 ReportTHE
TRUE
VALUE
OF OUR
MILK
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2013
it is our partnerships,
our place, our process
and our people that
driVes our success.
pARTnERsHIps
bUILT On
TRUsT
We aim to be recognised for excellence, quality and innovation in
everything we do.
It all starts with relationships. We understand the value of having long-term
sustainable partnerships throughout our entire value-chain. They underpin
our ability to deliver quality products our customers demand.
We regard our customers and our milk suppliers as our most important
business partners. It’s our mutual understanding and cohesive way of
working that drives our ability to all make more from milk.
FROM OUR
pLACE TO THE
WORLD
Our home is in the heart of Canterbury, New Zealand, nestled between the
majestic Southern Alps and the South Pacific Ocean.
The abundant water supply and the ability to irrigate year round coupled
with the flat and mild nature of the landscape makes Canterbury ideal for
dairy farming.
That’s why we chose this location for our manufacturing facilities. It’s the
unique and powerful blend of our environment, leading farming systems,
and the quality and consistency of milk supply that drives our competitive
advantage that we take to the world.
DynAMIC AnD
InnOVATIVE
pROCEss
To create world leading products for our customers we must be innovative
throughout our value-chain.
Lead With PrideTM, our internationally accredited ISO 65 dairy farm
assurance system, demonstrates industry leadership in food safety and
sustainability. It recognises and financially rewards our milk suppliers who
achieve dairy farming excellence.
By investing in superior specialist manufacturing facilities that allow for
production flexibility we’re able to tailor make products to meet the unique
individual needs of our customers.
It’s thinking like this that our customers value and that sets us apart.
pEOpLE
THAT DELIVER
VALUE
It’s our people who are the driving force behind our organisation’s success.
Our team has a wealth of experience in dairying, food safety, manufacturing,
product development, sales and customer service. We share a passion for
excellence and innovation and an overwhelming desire to deliver world-
class outcomes.
Driven by our vision of becoming the trusted supplier of choice for the
world’s leading milk-based health and nutrition companies our people are
empowered to be leaders in their field of expertise.
The value they create directly contributes to the performance of our
company and the relationships we have with our customers.
COnTEnTs
Trend Statement
Chairman’s Report
Pg 2
Pg 4
Managing Director’s Report Pg 8
Our Partnerships
Pg 16
Bright Dairy Partnership
FrieslandCampina Partnership
Our Place
Pg 20
Partnering With Our Community
Business Relationship Recognition
Sustainability Update
Introducing Lead With PrideTM
Looking After Our Place
Bringing the Market to Our Place
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 I
Our Process
Pg 24
Night Milk Project Update
A2 Milk
Lactoferrin Upgrade
Creating a Focus on Quality
Our People
Pg 28
Our Future
Developing Our Leaders
Our Remuneration
Keeping Our People Safe
Entrepreneurial Leadership
Best Place to Work
Meet Our Team
Pg 31
Pg 34
Pg 36
Pg 40
Our Governance
Board of Directors
Senior Executive Team
Pg 42
Our Financial Review
Pg 44
Our Financial Statements
Pg 46
Auditors Report
Pg 89
Statutory Disclosures
Pg 91
Directory
Pg 98
page 1
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ITREnD sTATEMEnT
Net Return on Capital
Employed (Pre-Tax)
13.1%
7.3%
FY2013
FY2012
Gross Profit Per MT
(NZD)
751
594
FY2013
FY2012
page 2 i
EBITDA
(in millions NZD)
38.5
22.1
FY2013
FY2012
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013Trend Statement
Currency as stated (in millions)
Financial Performance
Revenue
Gross Profit
Earnings before net finance costs and
income tax (EBIT)
NPAT
Revenue (USD per MT)
Gross profit per MT (NZD)
EBIT per MT sold (NZD)
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities
(13.8)
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
Capital employed 1
Net return on capital employed (pre-tax)
Foreign exchange rate (NZD:USD)
Synlait contracted milk price (kg MS)2
346.1
231.0
13.1%
0.80
5.81
FY2013
FY2013
FY2012
FY2011
FY2010
FY2009
Actual
PFI*
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
420.0
426.4
65.1
28.3
11.5
3,894
751
326
64.6
27.5
10.8
3,786
736
306
(8.3)
349.5
235.3
12.8%
0.81
5.80
376.8
46.0
13.4
4.4
3,644
594
174
29.8
277.3
195.3
7.3%
0.78
6.14
298.9
21.1
-
(3.1)
3,848
385
(10)
14.5
245.3
170.8
0.0%
0.73
7.66
233.4
23.7
5.3
(11.7)
2,882
462
124
17.0
151.0
102.4
5.0%
0.64
6.21
111.3
6.8
(4.1)
(14.2)
2,321
260
(131)
(7.2)
152.1
113.0
(4.4%)
0.63
5.03
Key Operational Metrics
FY2013
FY2013F
FY2012
FY2011
FY2010
FY2009
Sales
Ingredients
Infant formula and Nutritionals
Total Sales (MT)
Production
Ingredients
Infant formula and Nutritionals
Total Production (MT)
Milk Purchases
Milk purchased from Contracted supply
Milk purchased from Fonterra and other suppliers
Total Milk Purchases (kg MS in thousands)
*Prospective Financial Information.
81,085
5,661
86,746
81,148
10,081
91,229
42,076
4,692
46,768
80,902
6,888
87,790
80,856
10,772
91,628
42,032
4,617
46,649
73,003
4,412
77,415
76,661
4,737
81,398
37,572
6,453
44,025
54,648
51,271
29,393
238
-
-
54,886
51,271
29,393
53,807
49,729
33,197
608
294
-
54,415
50,023
33,19
24,934
4,524
29,458
21,865
4,525
26,390
14,404
4,101
18,505
**Note that the FY13 and FY12 periods have been completed based on the application of the monthly milk price accounting treatment. Prior years applied the
annual milk price accounting treatment.
1For the purpose of calculating our return on capital employed the capital employed at the end of FY13 has been reduced for working capital adjustments of
36.4m as further described in the ‘Financial Review’ section of this Annual Report on page 44-45.
2Base milk price for Synlait Milk suppliers on standard milk supply contract, excludes premiums paid.
page 3
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ICHAIRMAn’s
REpORT
Graeme Milne
CHAIRMAN
“
the board and management are proud of what we
haVe achieVed since inception. we continue to gather
a skilled and inspirational team of people who haVe
been instrumental in achieVing the business growth
throughout the 2013 financial year.
”
page 4 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IIt is a pleasure to report to
our shareholders on the fifth
year of operations for Synlait
Milk Limited.
operating performance
Through this turbulence we have continued to ‘Make More
from Milk’ by adding value to our dairy ingredient products
while developing our nutritional strategy. The key attributes
embedded in our products are quality and trust which
is especially so for our infant formula business. This year
was the first full year of production from our purpose built
infant formula and nutritional facility. We added several new
customers for nutritional products and increased sales at a
rapid rate, albeit slightly below plan. Nevertheless, the growth
I am pleased to announce an after tax profit for the FY13 year
was an impressive achievement as developing relationships
of $11.5 million, ahead of the prospective financial information
in these markets do take time. Customer relationships will
(PFI) and a significant increase on last year‘s $4.4 million.
endure as long as we fulfil our trust and quality promise. To
Total sales for the FY13 year were $420 million, slightly
this end during the year we recruited key new staff in quality
behind our PFI of $426 million however, well ahead of last
assurance, improved our quality systems and prepared for
year’s $377 million.
further investments in quality assurance technologies.
It was a turbulent year across our international markets.
Prices for whole milk powder at the start of the year were
milk supply
relatively low at US$2,700 per tonne, but by April 2013
Quality suppliers of products and services are key to our
they had risen to exceed US$5,000 and remained relatively
strong at this level until the financial year end. These returns
combined with the variability of the NZD exchange rate
would have translated, on a monthly basis, into a farm gate
price for milk of $NZ4.50 per kg MS at the start of the year
and to a $8.72 per kg MS milk price by the end of the financial
year, resulting in an average Synlait Milk base milk price of
$5.81 per kg MS for the FY13 year.
The near nationwide drought in New Zealand was a major
factor in the sudden rise in global dairy prices in April 2013.
success, particularly our 148 farmer milk suppliers as
at the end of the FY13. This year we held our inaugural
suppliers conference where all suppliers were invited to
hear presentations from our team and also an impressive
bench of our international customers. The connection of all
participants in our value-chain is a key strategy in achieving
extra commitment we are seeking for joint success. Also
during the year the ISO accredited Lead With PrideTM program
was introduced for milk suppliers. This provides them with
a dairy farm assurance system which is comprehensively
In addition to the drought there is growing pressure on the
targeted around social, environmental, animal health and
balance between supply and demand for dairy products in
welfare as well as milk quality.
our international markets.
Higher prices will inevitably lead to consumer resistance
people
away from dairy, while at the same time in Europe and the
Staff numbers grew to 171 in FY13. Careful recruitment,
United States of America higher prices are encouraging
induction and training are key to executing our business
increased production. Global grain prices, which have eased,
strategy. Many of our team have joined Synlait Milk for a
are expected to encourage increases in supply out of the
chance to participate in an enterprise where they can truly
United States of America. The removal of milk quotas in
make a difference. Team culture and pride continues to
the European Union in 2015 will see production increases,
grow and develop within the Company. All the team have
however as Western market economies continue to stabilise
contributed to this year’s result, but a special mention and
and recover and emerging markets continue to grow we will
thanks must go to John Penno, Managing Director, and Nigel
also see increased demand.
Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer. A special mention must
also go to Nigel’s finance team, who took on the brunt of
the considerable time and effort it takes to successfully go
through the Initial Public Offering process.
page 5
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 Ihealth and safety
We are also re-focusing our efforts in relation to Health
and Safety. Our current primary safety measure is Lost
Time Injuries (LTI’s), with an annual target of zero. For the
12 months to 31 July 2013 we had 1 LTI. We are moving to
the more internationally accepted best practice measure
of Total Recordable Injury Frequency rate (TRIFR) and are
In relation to our dividend policy, we confirm that with our
present focus firmly on growing the Company, no dividend
will be payable for the financial year ending 31 July 2013,
nor for period ending 31 July 2014. This is consistent
with statements made in the Investment Statement and
Prospectus at the time of listing.
also introducing a more fully integrated approach to health,
board changes
safety and wellness. More details can be found in the ‘our
governance’ section of this Annual Report.
initial public offering
The highlight of the financial year was our listing on the New
Zealand Stock Exchange on 23 July 2013. The listing raised
$68.9 million, after capital raising costs, of new capital which
together with an enhanced debt facilities package will be
used to fund our growth initiatives that are outlined in further
detail in the ‘our future’ section of this Annual Report.
As a consequence of the Initial Public Offering, shareholdings
changed and consequently there were movements in the
directorship. Ben Dingle, company founder and original
director stood down to make way for independent
appointments. We thank Ben for his vision, foresight and
strong contribution to Synlait Milk’s progress to date.
David Zheng, a Bright Dairy appointed director for the last
two years, also stood down to allow for the Bright Dairy
appointment of a New Zealand resident director. We thank
David for his contribution. Special thanks also to Ruth
Richardson who chaired Synlait Limited (the holder, until
The listing also enabled some of our existing shareholders to
the Initial Public Offering, of the 49% non- Bright held
sell down part or all of their holdings by way of a further sale
shareholding in Synlait Milk) through the Initial Public
of $37 million worth of shares. It was gratifying to see many
Offering process. On the other hand a warm welcome
of the original shareholders in Synlait Limited rewarded for
to Bill Roest and Sam Knowles who joined the board in
their belief, in what was at the start, a concept, a vision and
the pre-listing period and have already both made major
little else. It is also pleasing to see many of these longer term
contributions. John Penno, previously the CEO, now also
shareholders remaining on the register.
joins the Board as Managing Director.
We also welcome our new shareholders. We are particularly
pleased that FrieslandCampina have become a shareholder
outlook
with an initial holding of 7.5%. FrieslandCampina are a
The immediate future for Synlait Milk will be focused on
key customer for us and their investment is expected
delivering quality added value ingredients and nutritional
to strengthen our business to business and strategic
products to an expanding customer base and executing on
relationship with them. The Board were very encouraged by
the growth initiatives as detailed in the Investment Statement
the high level of participation by staff and directors buying
and Prospectus and updated in this Annual Report. We
shares at the initial offer. Over 30% of our staff acquired
remain confident in our strategy.
Synlait Milk shares, a vote of confidence that we are on the
right track and evidence we have a very committed team of
Kind regards
people working in the business.
shareholder returns
In terms of financial performance for our shareholders, we
have made good progress as set out in more detail in the
section ‘our financial review’ and in our Financial Statements.
It is early days as a listed Company however, we have made a
positive start with our share price closing at $2.61 on 31 July
2013, reflecting a total shareholder return (TSR) for the 9 day
period of 18.6%.
Graeme Milne
CHAIRMAN
page 6 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 i
page 7
MAnAgIng DIRECTOR’s
REpORT
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
we are clearly focused on our Value
added milk powder and nutritional powder
business and building a reputation for
Quality and technical eXcellence.
”
“
page 8 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOver the last six years Synlait Milk
has been focused on establishing
a strong platform on which to
execute our simple value-added
dairy manufacturing strategy. This
platform is based on supplying
value-added dairy based products
to a strong group of targeted
customers, with a focus on quality
throughout the supply chain,
including working closely with our
contract supplying dairy farmers.
We operate a business to business sales strategy. Our
Over 50% of our ingredient milk powder sales are now non-
standard products that generate value-added margins and
the volume continues to grow every year.
After years of planning and business development FY13 was
our first full year of infant formula manufacture with sales of
5,661 MT of infant formula and nutritional products. The year
on year infant formula and nutritional volume increase of 28%
significantly understates the development of this business.
A high proportion of the FY12 production volume was low
specification product sold at low margins to ensure sufficient
volume to commission the plant late in FY12. Much of the
sales volume occurred in the second half of FY13 as market
development came to fruition. This is further illustrated by the
fact that the volume manufactured in FY13 was over 10,000
MT as stocks were built to deliver on customer requirements
in the early months of FY14.
These products were manufactured from 46.8 million kg
MS comprising 42.1million kg MS purchased from our 148
supplying farms (there are 156 farms contracted for the
promise of not competing with our customers is important to
FY14 season) and 4.7million kg MS purchased from other
developing our value-chain focused business partnerships.
processors. Synlait Milk contract suppliers received an
In FY13 we sold 81,085 MT of ingredient milk powders and
anhydrous milk fat (AMF), up 11% on the previous year. An
increasing proportion of these ingredient products were sold
to preferred customers, with 90% of our total ingredients
average base milk price of $5.81 per kg MS. An additional
$0.08 per kg MS was paid as seasonal and value-added
premiums to provide an average total milk price of $5.89
per kg MS.
business being sold to only 10 customers. Increasingly our
Annual revenue of $420 million was up 11.5% based on
milk powders are focused on skim and whole milk powder for
additional sales volumes however, more importantly, strong
infant formula production, and milk powders manufactured
margin growth delivered a 74% increase in EBITDA and
for leading brand owners who market milk powder for
a 161% increase in NPAT to $38.5 million and $11.5m
home consumption.
Sales Volumes (MT)
respectively.
Growth
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
FY2009
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2013F
Ingredients
Infant formula and Nutritionals
161%
74%
11.5%
NPAT
EBITDA
Annual Revenue
page 9
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IIf there is a single measure of the strength of our simple
strategy going forward
business model it is that in FY13 the Company achieved
a pre-tax return on capital employed of 13.1%. It is worth
considering that this is ahead of the expected volume growth
in the high returning infant formula and nutritional products
we are now focused on achieving.
Executing the Initial Public
Offering late in the year was the
final building block in our six year
journey to establish the Company.
The equity raised, alongside expected earnings, will ensure
that the business remains conservatively geared as we now
invest to accelerate the development of our infant formula
and nutritionals business.
Gross Profit Per MT (NZD)
An analysis of our five year history
provides strong evidence of
consistent margin growth from a
gross profit of $260 per MT in FY09
to $751 per MT in FY13.
This is the result of a relentless focus on targeting the best
markets, the best customers and the highest margin products
for those customers.
Growing our margins from here will be delivered by achieving
two objectives;
1. Continuing to migrate our ingredient milk powder and
cream products to higher returning markets, customers
and products.
2. Capitalising on our strong start, to build our infant formula
and nutritional volumes.
All our recruitment, training and retention programs, market
and customer development, capital investment, quality
systems and process improvement activity is focused on
achieving these two objectives.
260
462
385
594
751
736
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
FY2013F
page 10 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013capital inVestment to increase
Value and Volume
A comprehensive overview of our development plans for our
Dunsandel manufacturing site was provided in the June 2013
Investment Statement and Prospectus, and a brief update on
these developments is provided in the ‘our future’ section of
this Annual Report.
Each of these projects is
specifically designed to either
enhance our value proposition and
build volume with targeted infant
formula and nutritional customers,
or enable us to continue providing
volume to valued ingredient
business customers.
Our proposed blending and canning line has been evaluated
and approved by some important future customers and we
are confident that what we are developing will not only
meet their requirements, but will genuinely be built to world
best standards.
We have made a decision to build all our new onsite
warehouse facilities now, rather than undertake the
warehouse expansion as a two stage process. This was
based on the large capital cost savings that became apparent
through the tender process. By the start of next season, this
new facility will provide complete supply chain integrity on
our site, with all inwards raw materials coming directly to site
and finished goods being packed for shipment on site before
leaving site for export.
market deVelopment
Global infant formula consumption is driven by the vast
demographic changes that are occurring in China, including
higher standards of education, increased urbanisation and
multigenerational households. Euromonitor International
estimates that at a retail level the Chinese infant formula
Our lactoferrin project continues to progress well. We have
market in 2017 will be 40% larger than the entire international
now manufactured spray dried product on a pilot scale
market was in 2007. On this basis, our infant strategy will
which has proved both our unique manufacturing system
inevitably have a strong China focus.
That said we are working with potential customers in a range
of markets. Post the melamine contamination incident of 2008
consumer preference has changed the Chinese infant formula
market from being 70% reliant on locally produced product
to 70% imported product. Recently, the Chinese Government
has openly stated that they are looking to reverse this
trend and rebuild confidence in local infant formula brands.
They are working to achieve this by imposing strict quality
standards on locally produced and imported product and
driving consolidation within the Chinese industry.
and provided samples for customer evaluation. This has
further increased our confidence of overcoming the technical
challenges that are inherent in this project.
Infant Formula Market
40%
WORLD
infant
formula
market
CHINA
infant
formula
market
2007
2017
page 11
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IThe Chinese Government has also instigated a range of
1) We operate a batch processing plant with very high
investigations into the excessively high retail prices being
hygiene standards and accurate control systems which
demanded by some brands. These changes are already
leads to high quality products with high yields and high
underway. Our expectations are that the plethora of small
product grading rates.
brands that are locally produced and imported will be
progressively forced out of the market. In addition, product
pricing, particularly of products manufactured outside
China, will be reduced. Lower prices, and a reduced number
of brands in the market, will drive volume growth for the
surviving brands.
Our investment in people, plant and systems has positioned
our business to supply partially and fully finished infant
formula products manufactured to world leading standards.
This has supported the development of Shanghai based
Bright Dairy’s ‘Pure CanterburyTM’ infant formula brand to
become one of the fastest growing in the Chinese market.
This brand has enjoyed rapid growth over the last quarter
as lesser brands have been removed from the market, and
as consumers continue to be concerned about real and
2) We use fresh milk as the base to manufacture our infant
formula products where many manufacturers use
reconstituted powders. In part, this is enabled by the
consistent yield and composition of milk produced on
irrigated farms in Canterbury.
3) We operate a very large scale infant formula and
nutritional manufacturing plant. It is two or three times
larger than most infant formula and nutritional spray
dryers leading to larger runs and lower capital and labour
costs per MT of product produced.
4) We achieve high levels of plant utilisation by using
the spray dryer for both infant formula and nutritional
products and high specification milk powders.
perceived quality issues. We believe our model of local
5) The New Zealand / China Free Trade Agreement provides
brand and channel to market ownership, combined with
New Zealand with a preferential tariff position. This is
high quality international supply fits with the Chinese
particularly important when exporting high value fully
Government’s desire to see confidence rebuilt in the local
finished infant formula products in consumer packs.
industry.
Now that we are fully operational
we have concentrated our
attention on using these
advantages to secure large
international customers who
are focused on quality and cost.
While these leading companies
are generally cautious and slow to
accept new suppliers, they each
have the potential to bring large
volumes of new business.
Over the last year we have signed
supply agreements with other
Chinese companies, in different
regions across China, and expect
these sales relationships to develop
along similar lines to the growth
pattern as we have enjoyed with
Bright Dairy.
As pricing pressure enters the market, we believe large
international brands will increasingly look to manufacturers
who can provide high quality product for the Chinese market,
at competitive pricing. During our entry to the Chinese
market we have established the ability to maintain margins
while pricing competitively. This is based on several key
factors built into the Synlait Milk manufacturing model;
page 12 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013products of integrity
Underpinning our entire strategy
is ensuring that our products are
leaders in terms of food safety and
product quality.
This was the motivation behind developing our Lead With
PrideTM dairy farm assurance system that is profiled on our
website and later in this report. We are pleased with the
strong support this has received from our supplier base and
within 12 months we expect to have put together sufficient
volume of certified milk to form the base for differentiated
products for leading customers.
Quality standards are increasing all the time. In recognition
growing and concentrating our milk
supply (additional Volume)
of this, a review of our quality systems early in FY13
Our Lead With PrideTM farm assurance program is also
identified the opportunity to make further improvements
expected to drive our milk procurement program going
by establishing our own product testing capability and
forward. We believe that our commitment to the program
restructuring the quality team under a new position of GM
and the financial incentives that are offered will attract the
Quality reporting to the Managing Director.
We were very pleased to appoint Michael Stein to this role
with over 20 years of infant formula quality management
experience including roles with Nestle, Nutricia and most
recently as Director of Quality for Mead Johnson, Asia Pacific.
This is of course essential when consumers are offering their
children formulated milk products. Our own market research
in the last year clearly showed that consumers want products
of integrity, where the value of the product is defined not only
by the measurable nutritional and quality attributes of the
product, but also by the back story – who stands behind the
product and where and how the product was produced.
growing number of farmers who are looking to differentiate
themselves from their peers on the basis of the integrity of
their production systems.
As the Company has become
more established, we have found
it increasingly straight forward
to attract supply from the right
farmers, with large operations
within close proximity to our
Dunsandel site.
page 13
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOur plan had been to recruit a small number of new
I would also like to thank our key advisors over the last year,
farmers close to our site to replace the farmers who had
with special mention to the teams from Deloitte, EY New
been supplying Synlait Milk under the Oceania Contracts
Zealand, Minter Ellison Rudd Watt, First New Zealand Capital
from South Canterbury. However, recent changes to
and Goldman Sachs.
our manufacturing plant which have increased peak
manufacturing capacity means that we will be working to
attract 15 more farmers than we had been planning for the
FY15 season. This will allow increased production volumes
in FY15 and help manage the transition to the increased
capacity that will come with the planned commissioning of
Dryer 3 in FY16.
thanks
In closing, I would like to thank my Board and staff. Executing
an Initial Public Offering, in addition to the constant growth
and change that is business as usual at Synlait Milk, has
required a heavy time commitment from all directors and
senior staff. I would like to particularly mention Graeme Milne
who continues to chair the Company with a steady hand, and
provide me with invaluable advice and support.
Most especially I would like to thank you – our shareholders.
Many of you have supported the Company over a long
period of time and have walked beside management as we
have weathered the ups and downs that are inevitable as
a company develops from infancy. I also acknowledge the
many new shareholders and thank you for your support and
for your confidence in our future.
My commitment to all of you is to
continue to focus on ‘making more
from milk’, and to take what we
have started and help it mature
into a great New Zealand company.
I would like to acknowledge the work of my senior team as
they continued to not only operate the business, but meet
Kind regards
our business improvement targets as Nigel Greenwood, Chief
Financial Officer and I focused on the Initial Public Offering
over the last six months.
Milk Purchases
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
page 14 i
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2013F
Milk purchased from contracted supply
Milk purchased from Fonterra and other suppliers
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013case studies and Business PeRFORMance
A yEAR OF
VALUE
CREATIOn
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 i
page 15
page 16 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR pARTnERsHIps
bright dairy
partnership
Bright Dairy is a major dairy industry
participant in China, specialising in the
development, production and sale of milk
and dairy products, management of dairy
farming operations, logistic distribution and the
development, production and sale of health and
nutrition products, including infant formula.
Bright Dairy have a number of well-known
dairy brands in the Chinese market including
a growing infant formula business, and are
listed on the Shanghai stock exchange with a
Pure CanterburyTM is positioned as premium
infant formula product. To date the
distribution of Pure CanterburyTM has been
focused on 3,000 Shanghai retail outlets.
Shanghai is a significant market for infant
formula with a total population of 23 million
and with approximately 200,000 babies born
in 2012.
In 2012, China had a total population
of approximately 1.34 billion and with
approximately 25.8 million babies born
market capitalisation of NZ$5billion dollars.
in 2012. Bright Dairy has a long term plan to expand the
Bright Dairy is part of the Bright Food Group. The Bright Food
Group is a major agriculture, food processing, distribution
distribution of Pure CanterburyTM to 40 major cities with
20,000 retail distribution channels.
and retail participant in China and has been investing
The Pure CanterburyTM brand story is mainly focused
internationally with interests including majority shareholdings
in Weetabix Food Company in the United Kingdom and
Manassen Foods in Australia.
on the source of its raw milk supply provided by Synlait.
Pure CanterburyTM packaging features the green grass
of the Canterbury plains and the majestic snow-capped
Bright Dairy has been a customer of Synlait Milk for the last
Southern Alps.
two years.
The Pure CanterburyTM infant
formula brand owned and
distributed by Bright Dairy was
the first infant formula product
to be made in our purpose built
state-of-the-art infant formula and
nutritional dryer in November 2011.
We have worked alongside Bright Dairy to provide expertise
in product development, quality testing and logistics. Over
the coming year our team will work alongside Bright Dairy to
assist with their marketing and promotion requirements of the
Pure CanterburyTM brand.
With the success of Pure CanterburyTM, we have recently
developed with Bright Dairy product line extensions of
the range, including a pregnant mother formula and two
additional infant formula products. The additional infant
formula products will be positioned in the premium end of
the market however, they will sit below the original Pure
CanterburyTM range price point to make the brand accessible
to a new range of premium consumers.
In addition, to our business as usual operations we have
worked with Bright Dairy on a number of industry good
events. These include senior executives from Bright Dairy
attending our Dryer 2 opening ceremony in Dunsandel and our
senior executives attending the launch of Pure CanterburyTM
in Shanghai in late 2011. In the last financial year Bright Dairy
executives spoke and attended our inaugural milk supplier
conference and currently we are working with Bright Dairy
to develop a Synlait Milk tradeshow stand to compliment the
Bright Dairy stand at a significant Shanghai food expo.
We look forward to further developing this relationship over
the coming years.
page 17
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR PARTNERSHIPS CONT...
frieslandcampina
partnership
Every day Royal
FrieslandCampina provides
around 1 billion consumers
all over the world with
food that is rich in valuable
nutrients.
Friesche Vlag, Mona, Optimel, Vifit,
Milner, Frico, Botergoud, Valess,
Appelsientje, DubbelFrisss, CoolBest,
Landliebe, Fruttis, Joyvalle, Yazoo,
Milli, Pöttyös, Napolact, NoyNoy,
Dutch Lady, Frisian Flag, Foremost,
Friso, Peak, Rainbow, Debic Valess,
DMV, Kievit, Domo, Creamy Creation
and Nutrifeed.
The Company is fully owned by
Zuivelcoöperatie FrieslandCampina
With annual revenue of 10.3 billion euro FrieslandCampina
U.A, with 19,487 member dairy farmers in the Netherlands,
is one of the world’s five largest dairy companies.
Germany and Belgium is one of the world’s largest dairy
FrieslandCampina supplies consumer products such as
cooperatives.
dairy-based beverages, infant & toddler nutrition, cheese and
desserts in many European countries, in Asia and in Africa.
FrieslandCampina has been a customer of Synlait Milk since
2008. We have worked together to develop new products and
Products are also supplied to professional customers,
over the years have moved our product offering for them from
including cream and butter products to bakeries and catering
ingredient products to value-added ingredient products.
companies. FrieslandCampina also supplies ingredients and
half-finished products to manufacturers of infant & toddler
nutrition, the food industry and the pharmaceutical sector
around the world.
We regularly meet with FrieslandCampina in market and
likewise, they make the long journey to New Zealand
several times a year in order to develop our business
relationship. Most recently, Hans Laarkakker, Director of
They have offices in 28 countries and employs a total of
Business Development at FrieslandCampina travelled from
19,946 people. FrieslandCampina’s products find their way to
the Netherlands to speak at our supplier conference held in
more than 100 countries. The Company’s central office is in
Ashburton. At the conference Mr. Laarkakker showed a video
Amersfoort, Netherlands.
FrieslandCampina’s activities are divided into four market-
oriented business groups:
1. Consumer products Europe.
2. Consumer products international.
3. Cheese, butter.
4. Milk powder and ingredients.
FrieslandCampina has a number of well-known brands
including but not limited to: Campina, Chocomel, Fristi,
that showcases the leading nature of FrieslandCampina’s
business. You can view this view by visiting YouTube and
searching ‘the story of milk’.
Over the last five years FrieslandCampina have become our
largest customer by volume and we look forward to further
developing our business relationship with them during the
current financial year.
page 18 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013OUR PARTNERSHIPS CONT...
business
relationship
recognition
The success of our global business
partnerships were formally recognised
during the last financial year by
winning two prestigious New Zealand
business awards.
In September 2012, we were delighted to win
the Champion Global Operator (Medium to Large
Enterprise) at the Canterbury Chamber of Commerce,
Champion Canterbury Awards. We are pleased to announce
that we have made the finals for this category again for the
pending 2013 awards.
In May 2013, we were honoured to win the New Zealand
China Trade Association (NZCTA) Supreme Award and the
DLA Phillips Fox Award for Successful Investment with China,
inward or outward at the HSBC NZCTA China Business Awards.
We are also pleased to announce that we have been
nominated as a finalist in the pending New Zealand Trade and
Enterprise International Business Awards in the category of
ANZ Best Business Operating Internationally over $50 million.
The award wins and nominations
recognise the significant
achievements our team have made
in both creating and developing
our global business relationships.
partnering with
our community
Our single business site sits just south
of Dunsandel, a small Mid-Canterbury
township with a population of
approximately 450 people. The Dunsandel
community has close affiliations with
dairy farming and rural industry, so
naturally we have a close relationship with
the Dunsandel township and support their local
events and charities.
We are proud to be the principal
naming rights sponsor of the
Dunsandel / Irwell Rugby Football
Club and sports ground.
Together, we have been able to grow the number of teams
playing in the mens and ladies senior competition, and
raise the clubs profile to become a focal point of the local
community. In May of this year we celebrated with the club
when they held their 125th jubilee.
Recently, we have supported the Dunsandel Volunteer Fire
Brigade with the purchase of a rapid response vehicle. The
community of Dunsandel is nestled beside State Highway
One and the volunteer brigade are kept very active attending
road accidents and community related call outs, in addition to
their standard fire-fighting duties. The rapid response vehicle
will enable the fire brigade to attend emergencies much faster
than they have been able to in the past.
We look forward to our continued partnership with the rugby
club, the fire brigade and other local charity and community
groups in the future.
page 19
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 Ipage 20 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR pLACE
sustainability update
We are fortunate to live and work in one of the most beautiful
The program is audited by the New Zealand Government
places in New Zealand. This is our home.
owned AsureQuality.
The positive financial impacts of the
system have been modelled by the
Agribusiness and Economics
Research Unit at Lincoln
University. Dr Andrew West,
Vice-Chancellor at Lincoln
University said ‘The analysis
has shown that certification
is likely to lead to significant
improvements in farm
profitability for the majority
of suppliers.’
In addition, to the supplier financial
benefits, Lead With PrideTM enables
us to demonstrate to our customers our
industry leadership in incentivising food
safety and sustainability initiatives intended to
enhance the integrity, safety and quality of milk produced on
certified farms.
Our first supplier farm to receive Lead With PrideTM
accreditation was ‘Trinity Holdings’ owned and operated
by Lance and Wendy Main. It is expected we will have 20
accredited Lead With PrideTM suppliers by the end of current
financial year.
To find out more about Lead With PrideTM please visit
www.synlait.com. You can also view the Lead With PrideTM
supplier promotional video by visiting YouTube and searching
‘Lead With PrideTM.’
We are committed to our environment.
We are in the process of developing a
comprehensive environmental and
sustainability plan, which will
balance the needs of our business
with the protection and care for
the environment.
We will be reporting in more
detail on our achievements
against this plan in our next
Annual Report. In the meantime,
there are several key initiatives
that we are proud of.
introducing
lead with pridetm
In April 2013, we launched our
internationally accredited ISO 65
dairy farm assurance system
called Lead With PrideTM. Lead With
PrideTM recognises and financially
rewards suppliers who achieve
dairy farming best practice.
Suppliers must meet criteria that we have developed
including, in some cases, exceeding our assessment of
industry best practice across the four pillars of dairy farming:
environment, animal health and welfare, milk quality and
social responsibility. In return, they are paid a financial
incentive above the standard milk price depending on the
certification level they are awarded.
page 21
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR PLACE CONT...
looking after
our place
At the start of the last financial
year we implemented a company
wide recycling initiative to
reduce our impact on the
environment.
With milk only being 13% milk
solids our manufacturing plant
returns more water to the
environment than it uses
to operate.
The project has taken us from 96%
waste (1,230 metric tonnes) and 4%
recycling (46.5 metric tonnes) in the
2012 financial year, to 8% waste (65
metric tonnes) and 92% recycling (759
metric tonnes) in the 2013 financial year.
We have also engaged a dedicated full-
time Mastagard employee to be based on-site
We have worked with industry experts
Waterforce, ICS, Babbage and Specialty
Seeds to develop a automated
irrigation system for the disposal of our
clean waste-water.
The dedicated waste-water disposal area
located on our business site is sewn in a
deep root pasture system, pasture which grows
to manage the program. Before the implementation of
well under wet conditions, the area is also not grazed
the initiative, recycling at our Dunsandel site was
or fertilised to limit nutrient leaching and minimises
effects on the environment.
The irrigation of the water is controlled
via a system which adjusts the rate
of water applied with the soil
infiltration capabilities.
The system reports on the
volume and application
rates to each sector of
the disposal area which
our environmental team
monitors.
We look forward to
developing and implementing
further initiatives such as these
in the coming year.
limited due to recycling services not being
available to the rural area.
In addition, to the recycling
program we have also
developed a new approach to
our clean waste water.
page 22 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013OUR PLACE CONT...
− Standard Foods Corporation, a major Taiwanese food
company, and
− Bright Dairy, a significant Chinese based food
manufacturing company.
In addition, the conference featured presentations from
Netherlands based dairy consultant Mark Voorbergen, ANZ
economist Con Williams and senior Synlait Milk
executives including Chairman Graeme Milne
and Managing Director John Penno.
Following the day, a gala dinner was
held at the Ashburton Aviation
Museum and was hosted by
television comedian Paul Ego.
The inaugural
conference was
well received and
is now due to be a
regular fixture on our
events calendar.
bringing the market
to our place
On Friday 12 July 2013,
approximately 400 Synlait Milk
suppliers and rural professionals
attended our inaugural milk supply
conference held at the Ashburton
Event Centre.
Themed ‘SOAR’ the event aimed to
connect our suppliers with our
global customers to develop
mutual understanding in order
to lift our industry to new
heights.
A number of senior executives
from our international customer
base spoke at the event,
including:
− Hoogwegt International, part of
Hoogwegt Group B.V., the world’s
largest privately owned dairy trading
company.
− FrieslandCampina, one of the world’s largest dairy
cooperatives.
− A2 Corporation, listed on the New Zealand stock exchange.
page 23
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 Ipage 24 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR pROCEss
night milk
project update
WellSleep, the University of Otago sleep
investigation centre based in Wellington,
has undertaken a unique clinical trial for
our ‘Night Milk’ a natural milk product
aimed at beating sleeplessness.
The product is made by
collection of milk produced
by cows during the hours of
darkness and subjecting it to
specialised processing at our
state-of-the-art nutritional plant.
Synlait Milk Research Manager, Dr. Simon Causer, explains
that cows produce a sleep-promoting hormone called
melatonin during the hours of darkness and just as with
human mothers, this hormone is expressed in the milk.
‘Melatonin plays a key role in helping humans regulate day-
night cycles and by selectively collecting milk produced by
cows during the night we can create a natural sleep aid,’ says
Causer.
Participants in the clinical trial were required to drink a glass
of ‘night milk’ 30 minutes before going to bed and sleep
quality was compared to sleep following the consumption of
conventional milk.
Most adults have experienced sleeplessness at some point in
their lives with an estimated 30-50% of the population affected
by insomnia and 10% having chronic insomnia. It takes a huge
toll on people’s energy, mood, health and ability to function
during the day.
The clinical trial yielded very positive results and we will be
looking to publish these in the medical and scientific literature
in order to support the selling of this product to customers.
a2 milk
In April 2012, we
announced an
agreement with A2
Corporation (A2C) for
the supply and
processing of A2 Milk into
infant formula.
Standard milking herds produce milk containing both A1 and
A2 beta-casein proteins. A2 milk is collected from cows that
only produce the A2 beta-casein protein. A2C market their
products on this point of difference and the proposed health
benefits of A2 milk.
During the last financial year we have worked with our supply
base to put in place 11 accredited A2 herds. In addition, we
have identified and are working with a number of additional
suppliers who have a view to converting their herd genetics
to the A2 variety.
In addition, to securing milk supply we have implemented a
number of processes and quality checks that ensure during
collection, processing and packaging that the A2 milk is kept
completely separate from our regular supply of milk.
A2C Managing Director Geoffrey Babidge said the agreement
‘with a highly reputable supplier of nutritional powders,’ was
a key step in their plan to launch infant formula products into
high growth Asian markets - particularly China.
In June 2013, A2C launched A2 Platinum infant formula at a
ceremony in Auckland. Our nutritional and quality teams have
worked alongside A2C to develop the Platinum range to their
exact specifications.
page 25
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR PROCESS CONT...
lactoferrin upgrade
In May this year we announced a
$15 million upgrade to our Special
Milks Dryer which will enable
us to become one of only two
manufacturers in the world to
produce lactoferrin as a spray dried
powder, and will also allow us to
manufacture dairy ingredients to
a pharmaceutical standard.
Lactoferrin is a bioactive protein extracted from milk that
provides significant antibacterial protection and other health
benefits for people of all ages. It is in demand globally for
health foods including infant formula and adult nutritional
powders.
We expect production to reach
23 metric tonnes within four years
of commissioning the plant in
early 2014.
Our lactoferrin process has been designed to achieve high
levels of bio-actively and solubility. Our spray dried product
is already receiving considerable interest from customers
looking for improved properties when used in infant formula
products. The market for lactoferrin has grown from 45,000
kilograms in 2001 to 185,000 kilograms in 2012 and is
projected to grow to 262,000 kilograms in 2017. On the current
market lactoferrin is priced at between US$500 to US$1,000
per kilogram.
You can read more about the lactoferrin upgrade project in the
‘our future’ section of this Annual Report.
SPECIAL
MILKS DRYER
page 26 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
OUR PROCESS CONT...
creating a focus
on Quality
To support our company vision to become
the supplier of choice to the world’s
leading milk-based health and nutrition
companies, a decision was made to
invest in a state-of-the-art quality testing
laboratory at our Dunsandel site. This
investment is one of our strategic growth
initiatives that will support our position
as a supplier of high quality, premium dairy
ingredients, infant formula and nutritional products.
We currently perform the majority
of our quality testing at contracted
external laboratories. It has
become evident that if we are to
meet our company vision, we will
need to invest in a fully equipped
on-site quality testing laboratory
to undertake the activities that we
are currently outsourcing.
There are several key benefits for us
that justify the significant investment
in an on-site quality testing
laboratory, including:
−
It ensures we can achieve our
high quality standards in a consistent
and efficient manner. Turnaround time
for quality testing will be reduced to
allow for more immediate availability of data
for analysis. This will provide for better response
time and communication between the quality and
operations teams and will speed up release of products to
our customers.
− It allows us to create a technical ‘center of excellence’
that can be staffed with the industry’s leading scientists
and food technologists. This will become essential as we
expand our presence in the infant formula and nutritional
products category.
− It strengthens our reputation with both our customers
and the regulatory bodies governing the markets we serve
by establishing an on-site quality testing laboratory that
is accredited to international standards. China currently
requires all in-country infant formula manufacturers to
conduct quality testing on-site and additional benefits can
be gained with our customers that may have the same
expectations of the benefits that in-house quality testing
The strategy for our quality testing laboratory will be to build
provides.
in-house capabilities to support the testing requirements
for the products we produce. This will include facilities to
conduct chemical, microbiological and physical property
testing using the latest technologies. In addition, to the
quality testing function, there will also be integrated facilities
for product development, support including conducting pilot
− It provides for a cost effective model that not only allows
for efficient management and greater control of the
quality testing process, but also reduces additional costs
associated with external testing including laboratory fees
and courier costs.
scale trials and sensory analysis to ensure the needs of our
We will engage expert external consultants specialising
customers are met.
in laboratory operations during the design, validation and
start-up of the quality testing laboratory. It is anticipated that
the laboratory will be operational before the end of the 2014
calendar year.
You can read more about the laboratory upgrade project in the
‘our future’ section of this Annual Report.
page 27
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 Ipage 28 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013OUR pEOpLE
deVeloping
our leaders
keeping our
people safe
It’s our people who make us what
we are and we are committed to
developing our leaders.
Developing our leaders is based on a solid foundation of
four key competencies: Managerial, Customers, Personal
Leadership and Leading Others.
These competencies can be applied across the business at
operational, tactical and strategic levels. This also allows us to
grow and support our current leaders in addition to nurturing
our future leaders.
In March 2013 we introduced a new leadership development
program, Blanchard’s Situational Leadership II (SLII), as part of
our wider training program at Synlait Milk.
The Blanchard model complements our core leadership
framework and equips our leaders with the tools to analyse,
diagnose, think and apply a leadership style that is adaptable
to a range of people and situations.
Currently 12 Synlait Milk managers have completed facilitator
training and have become certified
trainers of SLII, and over 25
people leaders from our wider
team have now completed
the training.
Our approach to workplace safety is ‘everybody safe home
every day.’ We have continued to build on our current robust
systems and process to ensure high employee participation
and a proactive approach to safety. Our continued work in
this area was recognised in June 2013, when we became
accredited as a secondary partner under ACC’s Workplace
Safety Management Practices program.
For more information on our commitment to health, safety and
wellness, see the section in ‘our governance’.
entrepreneurial
leadership
Congratulations to our Managing
Director, John Penno who recently
won the products category at
the EY Entrepreneur of the Year
Awards. John is now competing
for the overall title of New Zealand
Entrepreneur of the Year which
will be announced on the 17th
of October 2013. The winner
of the overall category will
be invited to compete in
the World Entrepreneur of
the Year Awards in Monte
Carlo in June 2014.
page 29
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR PEOPLE CONT...
best place to work
Since 2011 we have participated
in the Kenexa Best Workplaces
Survey to assist us in
understanding and measuring
the engagement of our staff.
Brad Harden has recently become our Dryer 2 Production
Manager. Brad is one of our original employees, who joined
the Company in early 2008 as a Process Leader. Brad’s
natural leadership ability and understanding of our stringent
production systems has seen him elevated to a senior position
in our manufacturing team. Brad is a trained chef, has lead
forestry gangs, but has found his calling in the dairy industry
over the last 12 years. We are also helping Brad tick an item
off his bucket list by supporting him in the Coast to Coast
multisport event.
Lisa Stewart has recently been promoted to Lead
Dispensary Operator on our infant formula and
nutritionals plant. Lisa joined our team in late
2011 as a Dispensary Operator. Her attention to
detail and her leadership ability has seen her
promoted to her current position. Lisa recently
was awarded the ‘Emerging Talent’ award at
our recent manufacturing team building day.
Bryce Happer joined our team back in 2008 as
an AMF Process Operator. Bryce’s easy going
nature and ability to problem solve makes him
a valuable member of our team. Bryce was
awarded our ‘Operator of the Year’ award at
our recent manufacturing team building day
for his efforts in training the new AMF staff
and his focus on AMF quality performance.
Outside of work you can find Bryce playing rugby
for our local Dunsandel Irwell Rugby Football Team
at Synlait Park.
Our recently completed third survey has shown
that, even with our significant growth, we
have continued to increase our overall staff
engagement (from 38.8% in 2012 to 42.4% in
2013) and importantly, we have continued to
decrease our levels of staff disengagement –
now down to 5%.
We are extremely pleased with this result and
we continue to ensure that we have strong
initiatives in this area to ensure that we
continue to deliver against our vision of being
a great place to work.
meet our team
Meet Gareth Lepper, Planning and Scheduling
Analyst at Synlait Milk. Gareth joined us
approximately one year ago as a fresh faced
graduate from the University of Canterbury
with a major in Management Science. From
the get-go Gareth impressed the team with
his enthusiastic attitude and aptitude for
understanding the software elements of his role.
Gareth is now working on our automatic planning
and automatic scheduling project assisting in the
design and implementation from a planning and
scheduling viewpoint, in order to improve our
planning system and optimise production.
page 30 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013OUR FUTURE
In the initial public offering
prospectus we outlined a series
of growth initiatives that we
have planned to undertake
to expand our capacity and
product offerings. We are pleased
to update you on the status of
these projects below.
On the map included in this document those areas in darker
blue are commenced projects with those in lighter blue still in
the planning.
1. Blending and Consumer Packaging
2. 22,500m2 Dry Store
Update: The project commenced on schedule in August
2013 with construction expected to start in October 2013.
The commission date has been moved forward to June
2014, from the originally planned August 2014. All contracts
for this project have now been awarded.
Current Status:
Design review underway
Major contracts awarded
Customer reviews complete
Preparation of building consent
Update: Due to build and economic efficiencies, the dryer
three dry store will now be included in this project bringing
the additional storage capacity onsite to 22,500m2, up from
the originally planned 12,500m2. The increased size of the
warehouse and approval process required for that change
has resulted in an extended construction period for this
project. The total project will cost $16.9 million up from the
$13 million originally planned, however this generates a
saving of $2.4 million on the dryer 3 warehouse build cost
that was allowed for in the dryer 3 project.
Expected Capacity:
17,500 MT per annum
Current Status:
Expected Total Cost:
$27.5 million
Project Start Date:
August 2013
Detailed design complete
Building consent submitted
Major contracts awarded
Construction started
Expected
Commissioning Date:
Major Contracts:
June 2014
Project Managers –
Babbage Consultants Ltd
Construction –
Apollo Projects Ltd
Canning equipment –
PLF International Ltd
Blending equipment –
Powder Projects Ltd
Expected Capacity:
22,500m2
Expected Total Cost:
$16.9 million
Construction Start Date: August 2013
Expected
Commissioning Date:
Major Contracts:
March 2014
Project Managers – Babbage
Consultants Ltd
Construction – Calder Stewart
Industries Ltd
page 31
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 I3. Lactoferrin Extraction and Purification Facility
5. Dryer 3
Update: The project commenced on schedule in May 2013
with construction of the plant now underway. Production
will commence in early 2014 as per our original plan.
Current Status:
Detailed design complete
Building consent submitted
Major contracts awarded
Pilot scale production complete
Expected Capacity:
23MT per annum
Expected Total Cost:
$15.1 million
Update: Resource consent is being sought and the plant
technical specification is in progress. Note, that the cost of
the third dry store associated with the build of dryer 3 has
been brought forward and accounted for in the 22,500m2 dry
store (project 2) outlined above.
Current Status:
Project Start Date:
May 2013
Expected Capacity:
Expected
Commissioning Date:
Late January 2014
Major Contracts:
Civil – Bradfords Building Ltd
Expected Total Cost:
Resource consent planning
(lodgement November 2013)
Conceptual design
Customer consultation
underway
5-6MT per hour
(Infant Formula)
8-10MT per hour
(Ingredients)
$103.5 million (now
excluding dry store 3)
Construction Start Date:
April 2014
Expected
Commissioning Date:
August 2015
6. Ammix Butter Plant
Update: Design for this plant will begin in February 2014.
Current Status:
Planning
Expected Capacity:
7MT per hour (25,000 MT
pa or 40,000 MT pa with
external cream source).
Expected Total Cost:
$15 million
Construction Start Date:
August 2014
Expected
Commissioning Date:
May 2015
Mechanical - NDA Group
Automation and Electrical –
Industrial Controls Ltd
Process Equipment – GEA
Process Engineering Ltd –
Powder Projects Ltd
4. Quality Testing Laboratory and Admin Building
Update: With the steady increase in staff numbers, we will
now incorporate the laboratory ($3.9 million) with a new
administration building ($4.5 million). Architectural design
is underway with an expected construction start date in
March 2014. The commissioning date is expected to be
August 2014, updated from the originally planned March
2014. This will result in some operational savings in FY14
related to start-up costs that are now deferred until FY15.
Current Status:
Resource consent planning
Architectural design underway
Expected Total Cost:
$8.4 million
Construction Start Date: March 2014
Expected
Commissioning Date:
August 2014
page 32 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013environmental
loadout area
DRYSTORE 3
PROPOSED
COLD STORE
proposed forklift
corridor
proposed walkway
canning
proposed packing 3
proposed office
extension and laboratory
blending
proposed dryer 3
proposed butter
lactoferrin
proposed
maintenance
store & workshop
proposed reception 2
proposed boiler 3
proposed security
control
page 33
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR REMUnERATIOn
We seek to ensure our
remuneration framework and
policies attract and retain the best
people we can for our business.
We are intending to have the following share incentive plans
in place for our staff (not including Directors other than the
Managing Director):
− Senior Executive IPO Incentive Scheme: This scheme
provides an incentive to retain senior executives post-
IPO for a period of three years, vesting a set number of
Synlait Milk shares in each of them depending on the
We aim to be fair, consistent, hire excellence, and provide
number of performance hurdles which have been met in
a great place to work, learn and develop. We reward team-
each year. The maximum value opportunity per senior
work and value excellence. To ensure we remain competitive
executive participating in the scheme is 75% of their base
in the market, we use information from an independent
remuneration as at 1 August 2013. They can receive up
remuneration adviser ‘Strategic Pay’ to establish applicable
to a maximum value of 25% of their base salary, by way
bands for a position. Remuneration is then set based on
of rights to shares valued at the IPO price, which will only
performance, experience and overall value to the Company
vest at the end of the three year period, post IPO, on the
and is reviewed annually.
The Remuneration and Governance Committee oversees the
condition that they are still employed at Synlait Milk and
that the share price at that point is above the IPO price.
operation of our remuneration policy, and monitors the overall
The performance hurdles are split into two separate Company
budgets for all employees. The Committee also recommends
goals. The first is ensuring the Company over-performs on our
to the Board for approval the remuneration and bonus
budgeted net profit after tax by 10% or more, and the second
arrangements for our Senior Management Team.
is that certain annual compound growth targets in total
Our Directors and our employees’ remuneration details
shareholder returns (TSR) reaches the following set targets:
(including the Managing Director’s) are set out in the
TSR
‘Statutory Information’ section. We also assess our Directors
Annual entitlement
as a % of base salary
performance and fees bi-ennially.
20% or more
15%
12%
Less than 12%
25%
18.75%
6.25%
0%
page 34 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013If all the targets were met, then we have provisioned for the
transfer of shares worth an issue price of approximately $3.3m.
superannuation
We participate in KiwiSaver, and
pay the employer contribution of
3% for all employees participating
in KiwiSaver.
− Staff Short Term Incentive Share Scheme: The scheme
applies to all our non-senior management employees who
are eligible to participate. Each employee will earn $2,000
worth of Synlait Milk shares (net of any PAYE tax that may
be payable) should we over-perform on our budgeted net
profit before tax by 20% or more for FY2014.
If all the eligible employees receive these incentive shares,
then we have anticipated the value to be approximately
$450,000.
short term incentiVe
scheme – (sti)
We have a short term performance
bonus scheme operating at various
levels across our organisation.
For employees below senior management level the STI
opportunity ranges from 5% to 15% of the base remuneration
and is based on a mixture of Company profit, team and
individual objectives. At senior manager level the STI
opportunity ranges from 20% of based remuneration for
direct reports to the Managing Director and 40% of base
remuneration for the Managing Director. The STI is awarded
based on exceeding budgeted NPAT (40%), shared Company
objectives (20%) and personal performance hurdles (40%).
page 35
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IcOMPanY stRuctuRe
WE’RE bUILDIng
A WORLD CLAss
bUsInEss
page 36 i Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR gOVERnAnCE
You will already know that Synlait Milk Limited is a limited
table. Sam and Bill were appointed prior to our listing on the
liability company under the Companies Act 1993 and that we
NZX to bolster our independent Director credentials.
are listed on the Main Board of the NZX (see the code ‘SML’
on www.nzx.com ).
All our Directors are profiled on pages 40-41 of this Annual
Report. A third of our independent directors will retire each
But what you might not know, is the detail behind our very
year and Bright Dairy may appoint their Directors as they wish
strong governance framework, which is designed to ensure
(but one must always be a New Zealand resident, experienced
we are a professionally run organisation you can trust in.
Director). More details can be found in our Constitution, at the
We are proud of what we have achieved to date and the way
our Company is managed.
following link www.synlait.com/site/uploads/2013/07/Synlait-
Milk-Limited-Constitution.pdf
our board
Our Board is responsible for the overall corporate governance
of Synlait Milk including strategic direction, determination
of policy, approval of significant contracts / projects, capital
our board committees
An important part of good governance is ensuring an
organisation has specialised groups focused on the essential
parts of the corporate landscape.
and operating budgets and overall stewardship of our
We have established the following permanent Board
organisation. Our Board is committed to ensuring we not only
Committees:
make ‘More from Milk,’ but also make more from ourselves, in
efficiently and effectively managing Synlait Milk to deliver on
the results we all expect.
− Audit and Risk Committee – chaired by independent
Director Bill Roest (other members – Dong Zongbo,
Graeme Milne). It is charged with monitoring our internal
We were listed on the NZX on 23 July 2013, and this meant
control and risk management systems, financial reporting
quite a few changes to our then governance structure as we
obligations, independent audit process and ensuring we
prepared for listing.
We are a non-standard Company in terms of NZX listing
requirements – and have certain waivers from the NZX to this
comply at all times with all applicable laws, regulations,
Listing Rules and our own Company Policies and
procedures.
effect. More details on the NZX waivers are detailed in our
− Remuneration and Governance Committee – chaired
Statutory Information section.
Our Board has up to eight Directors, and while our major
shareholder Bright Dairy holds at least 37% of our shares,
Bright Dairy may appoint up to four of those Directors - one of
whom must be a New Zealand resident who is an experienced
director. We are fortunate to have one of our long-serving Board
members The Honourable Ruth Richardson to fulfil this role.
We also must have a Managing Director who cannot be a
Bright Dairy Director (John Penno), and three independent
directors (Sam Knowles, Graeme Milne and Bill Roest). Our
independent Directors not only satisfy these requirements, but
also bring considerable expertise and experience to the Board
by Ruth Richardson (other members – Graeme Milne, Li Ke,
Sam Knowles). It is charged with ensuring our commitment
to health and safety, best practice employment and fair
and proper remuneration is maintained at all times. The
Committee is also responsible for ensuring all training
and development and proper governance structures are in
place and being properly used at all levels of the Company.
Both Committees have Charters governing their operation,
membership and remit to ensure that Synlait is optimally
managed and governed at all times. Both Committees meet
at least four times a year, but are also available at any stage to
consider any issue within their responsibility.
page 37
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 IOUR gOVERnAnCE COnT...
We also have a standing Committee appointed:
− Sales Policy: This sets out our internal commercial
− Disclosure Committee – chaired by the Managing
Director (other members being the Chair of the Board and
position with respect to our sales of products to customers,
in terms of pricing, volumes, reporting and forecasting.
the CFO, with an alternate member being the Chair of
− Continuous Disclosure Policy: This ensures we always
Audit and Risk Committee). It monitors compliance by the
immediately inform the market of any material information
Company and staff in relation to our Share Trading Policy
and have in place proper management processes to ensure
and Guidelines and ensures that all ‘material information’
this is a discipline throughout the whole organisation.
which is required to be disclosed to the market under the
The Disclosure Committee is responsible for monitoring
NZX Listing Rules is immediately disclosed.
compliance with this policy.
polices and charters
− Securities Trading Policy and Guidelines: This is to
ensure all our staff and Directors appreciate the special role
Our Board believes in good governance and has ensured we
they hold and ensure they operate ethically and properly
have in place the following essential corporate governance
in relation to any personal activity. This includes express
documents (amongst others):
− Board Charter: This is the ‘guide book’ for our Board
in terms of objectives and rules to make sure we always
‘black-out’ periods for special classes of our staff with
in-depth financial and Company knowledge. It also has a
detailed reporting regime to ensure compliance.
follow our Constitution, statutory duties and other
− Directors’ Conflict of Interest Policy: This ensures all
corporate obligations.
− Board Code of Ethics: This sets the moral compass
for our Directors in all Synlait Milk matters – ensuring
our Directors appreciate and know how to manage and
mitigate any impact on our Synlait Milk operations relative
to their own personal affairs.
professionalism, ethical conduct and best practice is
− Related Transaction Policy: This ensures any major
maintained at the Board table and beyond by all our
shareholders are treated purely on an arms-length basis
Directors. An important part of the Code is the use of
and in the best interests of Synlait Milk at all times.
Company information by Directors, which safeguards
Company confidential information.
− Delegated Authorities Policy: This is the operational
guide for our Board and all staff in the day-to-day
− Audit & Risk Committee Charter and Remuneration &
Governance Committee Charter: For each Committee,
operations of Synlait Milk, ensuring a proper degree of
accountability and control is maintained at all times and
its Charter sets out the objectives, authorities, roles and
allowing risk to be properly apportioned and managed.
responsibilities and operational rules for the respective
members to ensure they deliver on their governance
requirements.
− Employee Handbook: Apart from the operational
aspects of working at Synlait Milk, this Handbook has
the professional obligations and ethics expected of all
− Treasury Management Policy: Is our internal policy
staff and also a protected disclosures regime (whistle-
for managing our forex, debt, interest rates and related
blowers provisions) – ensuring any major problems can
financial activities. This is actively managed and forms part
be immediately brought to senior management’s or the
of our essential internal controls.
Board’s attention without fear of any negative reaction.
page 38 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013OUR gOVERnAnCE COnT...
All the above Policies, Charters and Codes are to be reviewed
health and safety
at least annually by the Board or applicable Board Committee
to ensure they continue to deliver the optimal structure for
governing our Company going forward.
We have many other internal policies and procedures to
ensure we are an efficiently and effectively run organisation.
We appreciate that the success of our business depends on
our excellent staff, and so their wellbeing is of vital importance
to us. Accordingly, we are committed to health, safety and
wellness at Synlait Milk.
Our vision is: Everybody safe home every day.
For more information on our publicly available Policies and
Charters, please visit our investor relations section on our
Our objectives are:
website at www.synlait.com/investors/corporate-governance/
- Zero exposure to uncontrolled risks.
The Directors’ disclosures of interests are set out in Statutory
- Fatal (critical) risk focus.
Information section.
our operations
- Zero injury accidents.
- Healthy and well; living life in balance.
All of our Board members have access to all relevant Synlait
We are developing a fully integrated approach to health &
Milk information, and are fully briefed before each Board
safety matters – maintaining our present focus of strong
meeting. They are provided with minutes of past meetings,
operational systems and procedures, and continuing our
and have available the Synlait Milk Company Secretary and
emphasis on rehabilitation in the event of injury or incident.
Synlait Milk management to answer any questions or to
respond to any issues at any time.
Over the next three years we have committed as an
organisation to migrate our present Workplace Safety
Our Board has determined we are in compliance with all NZX
Management Practices approach into a wider Synlait Milk
Listing Rules and applicable legal requirements.
Safety Management System. This will be achieved through a
our focus for 2014
We are focusing on improving our corporate risk management
practices and looking at extending our enterprise-wide risk
strategies.
Our internal audit function still needs to be further developed
(as we have just become a listed entity in July 2013) and this
is something we are working towards as we grow as a listed
Company.
comprehensive review of all health, safety and wellness risks
using the ‘Bow Tie’ risks and control measures assessment
approach, and by us implementing a new system to capture
risks, hazards and incidents.
Included in our safety initiatives is a review of our safety
on-boarding processes and information; rollout training in
ICAM root cause investigation methodology (Incident, Cause,
Analysis, Method); review of our employee participation
systems and a move to a focus on measuring total recordable
injury frequency rate (TRIFR). We will report on our TRIFR
We are also focusing on developing a sustainability policy and
achievement in our next Annual Report.
environmental policy that we will be able to report on in our
next Annual Report.
page 39
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 I
bOARD OF DIRECTORs
Zongbo Dong
Ke Li
Graeme Roderick Milne
Willem (Bill) Jan Roest
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
CHAIRMAN (independent)
NON-ExECUTIvE DIRECTOR
Li was appointed a director of
Synlait Milk in August 2010. Li has
worked for Bright Dairy for over
12 years. During this time, she has
mainly been responsible for sales
and marketing.
During her years at Bright Dairy, Li
has made significant contributions
to the growth of many different
brands of the company, including
the Bright brand. Li is also leading
a team tasked with promoting
Pure CanterburyTM infant formula
products in China. This brand has
achieved remarkable growth in
China in the last few years.
Li is currently the vice president
of Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd
and the head of marketing. She
also heads the public relations
department at Bright Dairy. Li is
currently a director (and in the last
five years has been a director) of a
number of Bright Dairy subsidiaries.
Before working for Bright Dairy, she
was the sales manager for Shanghai
Jia Qi Children clothes Co., Ltd and
Shanghai NiceKid Clothes Co., Ltd.
Li is also currently a director of SML
New Zealand Limited and Synlait
Milk Finance Limited.
Li holds a Master of Business
Administration from La Trobe
University.
Graeme joined the Synlait Group
as a director in 2006. Graeme
brings extensive international dairy
industry experience to the Board.
He has spent most of his career in
the dairy industry working in New
Zealand, Australia and Europe.
Graeme’s first role as a CEO was for
Bay Milk Products in 1992.
Later he was CEO of the New
Zealand Dairy Group prior to the
formation of Fonterra and thereafter
held various interim roles as CEO
of Richmond Limited and Bonlac
Limited in Australia.
Graeme is now a farmer and
company director in a range
of sectors. Graeme’s other
Chairmanships are currently
Waikato District Health Board,
Terracare Fertilisers Limited, New
Zealand Pharmaceuticals Limited,
Johnes Disease Research Limited
and the Rural Broadband Initiative
National Advisory Committee.
Graeme is also currently a director
for a number of organisations
including but not limited to Genesis
Power Limited, FMG and Alliance
Group Limited.
Graeme is a member of the Massey
University School of Advanced
Engineering and Technology
Advisory Board.
(independent), CHAIR Of THE AUDIT
AND RISK COMMITTEE
Bill was appointed to the Synlait
Milk Board in May 2013. Prior to
joining Synlait Milk, Bill had a long
and varied career with the Fletcher
Group including the last 12 years as
Chief Financial Officer of Fletcher
Building Limited, from which he
retired in April 2013.
Bill had several leadership roles in
the New Zealand corporate sector
before joining Fletcher Challenge
Limited upon the acquisition of
Group Rentals in 1986. Bill was
Managing Director of Fletcher
Residential and Fletcher Aluminium
before taking up a role with
Fletcher Building on the separation
of Fletcher Challenge in 2001.
Bill’s other board appointments
include director of SML New
Zealand Limited, Synlait Milk
Finance Limited, Fisher and Paykel
Appliances Holdings Limited where
he chairs the Audit Committee and
director of Housing Foundation
Limited, the not-for-profit New
Zealand Housing Foundation which
assists low income families into first
home ownership. In the past five
years Bill has been an executive
officer of Fletcher Building Limited
and in that capacity was a director
of Fletcher Building Limited
subsidiaries and associate
companies.
Dong was appointed a director of
Synlait Milk in August 2010. Dong
entered the dairy business in 1985
and has worked in accounting and
finance roles in the dairy industry
since then.
Dong led the finance team in the
establishment of the Shanghai No.
8 Dairy Plant in 1988, which later
became the largest yoghurt plant in
Asia. He was appointed vice general
manager and CFO of Shanghai
Danone Yogurt and Cheese Co.,
Ltd. in the 1990s. He also organised
the merger of sixteen subsidiaries
of Bright Group and their entering
into the Bright Dairy & Co., Ltd.
structure.
After a number of years in
leading finance roles in different
subsidiaries, Dong became CFO
for Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd in
2007. Dong is currently a director
(and in the last five years has been
a director) and supervisor of a
number of Bright Dairy subsidiaries,
including two major production
facilities and several distribution
companies. Dong is also currently
a director of SML New Zealand
Limited and Synlait Milk Finance
Limited.
Dong is a member of the Institute
of Public Accountants (Australia)
and has certification granted by
China Association of Chief Financial
Officers.
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT ;
ZONGBO DONG
KE LI
GRAEME RODERICK MILNE
WILLEM (BILL) JAN ROEST
JOHN WILLIAM PENNO
RUTH MARGARET RICHARDSON
SAM KNOWLES
SIHANG YANG
page 40 i
i
Bill is a member of the Institute
of Directors, a Fellow of the
Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants (UK) and a member
of the Association of Chartered
Accountants (NZ).
John William Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
(non-independent)
John co-founded the Synlait Group
in 2000 and has been a full-time
executive for the Synlait Group
for the last 11 years. With the
appointment of Graeme Milne as
an independent chairman of Synlait
Limited in 2006, John stood down
from his initial role as executive
chair to focus on the Managing
Director role.
After completing an Agricultural
Science degree, John commenced
his career in the dairy industry as
a consulting officer for the New
Zealand Dairy Board before joining
Dexcel as a research scientist
where he completed a PhD in
animal science. As a scientist and
research program leader he worked
to enable New Zealand dairy
farmers to increase productivity and
profit. In 2000, John was appointed
General Manager of the NZ National
Dairy Industry Extension Program
which serviced farm owners,
workers and rural professionals.
John was appointed as Managing
Director of Synlait Milk on 21
June 2013. John is also currently
a director of SML New Zealand
Limited, Synlait Milk Finance
Limited, Synlait Farms Limited
(which is a supplier of raw milk to
Synlait Milk), Synlait Farms Finance
Limited, Robindale Dairies Limited,
Thorndale Dairies Limited and
Riverlands Four Limited. In the
past five years John has also been
a director of Dairy Insight, Axe
Brasil Limited, Synlait Limited and
a number of companies associated
with the Synlait Group and / or
dairy farms. John was the inaugural
Chairman of the Dairying and
Environment Leadership Group.
John is a member of the New
Zealand China Council Advisory
Board. In 2009, John received an
emerging leaders award from the
Sir Peter Blake Trust and was also
awarded the Federated Farmers
inaugural agribusiness person of
the year.
Ruth Margaret Richardson
NON-ExECUTIvE DIRECTOR, CHAIR Of
REMUNERATION AND GOvERNANCE
COMMITTEE
Ruth is a professional company
director specialising in agribusiness,
the commercialisation of innovation,
information technology and finance.
Ruth joined the Synlait Group as
their first independent director
in 2004. Ruth was elected as the
Member of Parliament
for Selwyn (Synlait Milk’s base) in
1981 and served as New Zealand’s
Minister of Finance from 1990 to 1993.
sector governance including over
10 years on boards of NZX listed
companies.
Subsequent to her political
career, Ruth established an
international practice as a public
policy consultant and assumed
an extensive range of corporate
governance responsibilities both in
New Zealand and internationally.
Ruth is currently Chairman
of Jade Software Corporation
Limited, Synlait Limited, Syft
Technologies Limited, Kiwi
Innovation Network Limited
(Kiwinet - commercialisation of
publicly funded innovation) and
the Kula Fund (a Pacific Private
Equity fund) and is a director of
SML New Zealand Limited, Synlait
Milk Finance Limited, The New
Zealand Merino Company Limited,
Robindale Dairies Limited and Ruth
Richardson (NZ) Limited. Ruth’s
previous directorships include Dairy
Brands, the Reserve Bank of New
Zealand and Wrightson Limited
amongst others.
Ruth holds a Bachelor of Laws (with
honours) from the University of
Canterbury.
Sam Knowles
NON-ExECUTIvE DIRECTOR
(independent)
Sam has held senior executive
positions in major banks in both
Australia and New Zealand and has
extensive experience in strategy,
marketing, organisational capability
building and private and public
Sam is perhaps best known for his
role in establishing Kiwibank and
subsequently leading the company
over 10 years through its transition
from start-up to a large successful
business.
Since leaving Kiwibank in 2010
Sam has taken governance roles
in growth businesses. His NZX
listed companies are Chairman of
Xero and a Director of TrustPower
and SLI Systems. Sam’s other
governance roles include Chairman
of Partners Life, OnBrand Partners
and Fingertapps and a Director of
Magritek and Rangatira.
Sihang Yang
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
Yang was appointed a director
of Synlait Milk in August 2010.
Before working for Bright Dairy,
Yang worked for Heilongjiang Dairy
Group as the director of technology
and subsequently as the director of
quality assurance.
Following those roles, Yang was
appointed the secretary-general
of Heilongjiang Dairy Industry
Association and a director of China
Dairy Industry Association.
Yang is currently the director of
strategy and research at Bright
Dairy & Food Co., Ltd. He is
currently a director (and in the past
five years has been a director) of a
number of Bright Dairy subsidiaries.
He is also a director of SML New
Zealand Limited, Synlait Milk
Finance Limited and Zhejiang Hai
Hua Dairy Co., Ltd.
Yang holds a master’s degree in
food science and engineering and
has worked for more than 15 years
in the dairy industry.
page 41
i
sEnIOR MAnAgEMEnT TEAM
During his career, Michael also held
quality, food safety and laboratory
leadership roles with Nestle
Nutrition, Nestle USA and Nutricia,
Inc. Michael earned his Bachelor
of Science degree in Microbiology
from the Ohio State University.
Mike Lee
GENERAL MANAGER / INGREDIENT
SALES
Mike joined Synlait Milk in
September 2011 and leads the
Ingredients business for sales,
business development and overall
category profitability. Mike worked
for Fonterra and the NZ Dairy Board
for 14 years in sales, marketing
and business development roles
in the international ingredient
business, including working for 10
years in Europe, Asia and Australia.
Mike has worked extensively with
both commodity and added value
ingredients.
Mike worked for seven years
in two research and innovation
organisations involved in
environmental research and
biomaterials, leading the business
and technology commercialisation
functions including various start-
up and growth businesses. Mike
has a degree in Food Technology
and a Diploma in Business and is
really enjoying his return to the
international dairy industry.
Matthew Foster
GENERAL MANAGER SUPPLY CHAIN
Matthew joined Synlait Milk in
February 2012 and is responsible for
managing and developing Synlait
Milk’s supply chain activities
from farmer to customer. He
brings a wealth of supply chain
management and dairy industry
experience to Synlait Milk after a 20
year career with the New Zealand
Dairy Board and Fonterra where he
held senior management positions
in the United Kingdom, Australia,
Japan, the Americas and New
Zealand.
Before joining Synlait Milk,
Matthew was CEO at NZL Group
and prior to that General Manager
Commercial for Tasman Orient
Line. Matthew is a member of the
New Zealand Institute of Chartered
Accountants and holds a Bachelor
of Management Studies from the
University of Waikato.
Tony McKenna
GENERAL MANAGER NUTRITIONALS
Tony joined Synlait Milk in
August 2009 with the objective of
developing Synlait Milk’s nutritional
powder and special milks business
portfolio with a particular focus on
infant formula. Tony has significant
experience in R&D management,
product development, new business
development, dairy ingredient sales
and general management.
Prior to joining Synlait Milk, Tony
held positions including CEO of
LactoPharma, Technical Manager
of Fonterra’s Bioactives and
Health global portfolio, Senior
Researcher and R&D Portfolio
Manager for the New Zealand
Dairy Research Institute and
GM Technical and Nutritionals
at Tatura Milk (Australia). While
at Tatura, Tony developed and
implemented its infant formula
growth strategy into Australasia
and Asia. Tony was formerly
a director of Dairy Innovation
Australia, Dairy Technical Services
and the Australian Co-Operative
Research Centre for Innovative
Dairy Products. Tony holds a PhD in
Food Technology and a Diploma in
Management.
Michael Stein
GENERAL MANAGER QUALITY
Michael Stein joined Synlait Milk
in June 2013 and is responsible
for providing strategic leadership
for quality across the Synlait Milk
business. Michael leads a team
of quality assurance and other
professionals with the objective
of ensuring that Synlait Milk
continuously improves its quality
systems to deliver safe, high quality
dairy ingredients and nutritional
products that meet our customer’s
expectations and regulatory
requirements in the markets we
serve.
Michael brings to Synlait Milk
over 20 years of global quality
management experience in the
infant formula, nutritional products
and medical foods business. His
most recent role was Director of
Quality for Mead Johnson Nutrition,
Asia-Pacific where he led quality
and technical teams at business
units and manufacturing sites
across China, South East Asia,
Oceania and the Middle East.
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT ;
MICHAEL STEIN
MIKE LEE
MATTHEW FOSTER
TONY MCKENNA
JOHN PENNO
NIGEL GREENWOOD
NATALIE LOMBE
MICHAEL WAN
NEIL BETTERIDGE
page 42 i
i
John is also currently a director of
SML New Zealand Limited, Synlait
Milk Finance Limited, Synlait Farms
Limited (which is a supplier of raw
milk to Synlait Milk), Synlait Farms
Finance Limited, Robindale Dairies
Limited, Thorndale Dairies Limited
and Riverlands Four Limited.
In the past five years John has also
been a director of Dairy Insight, Axe
Brasil Limited, Synlait Limited and
a number of companies associated
with the Synlait Group and / or
dairy farms.
John was the inaugural Chairman
of the Dairying and Environment
Leadership Group. John is a
member of the New Zealand
China Council Advisory Board. In
2009, John received an emerging
leaders award from the Sir Peter
Blake Trust and was also awarded
the Federated Farmers inaugural
agribusiness person of the year.
John Penno
CHIEf ExECUTIvE OffICER &
MANAGING DIRECTOR
John co-founded the Synlait Group
in 2000 and has been a full-time
executive for the Synlait Group
for the last 11 years. With the
appointment of Graeme Milne as
an independent chairman of Synlait
Limited in 2006, John stood down
from his initial role as executive
chair to focus on the Managing
Director role.
After completing an Agricultural
Science degree, John commenced
his career in the dairy industry as
a consulting officer for the New
Zealand Dairy Board before joining
Dexcel as a research scientist
where he completed a PhD in
animal science. As a scientist and
research program leader he worked
to enable New Zealand dairy
farmers to increase productivity
and profit. In 2000, John was
appointed General Manager of
the NZ National Dairy Industry
Extension Program which serviced
farm owners, workers and rural
professionals. John was appointed
as Managing Director of Synlait
Milk on 21 June 2013.
Nigel Greenwood
Michael Wan
CHIEf fINANCIAL OffICER
MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS
Nigel has had extensive experience
in finance, having held senior
executive finance roles with
various New Zealand companies.
As CFO, Nigel is responsible for
finance, funding, legal, information
technology and strategy.
Prior to joining Synlait Milk in April
2010, Nigel held CFO roles with
Crane Distribution NZ Limited,
Gough Group Limited and Lyttelton
Port Company Limited.
Nigel is a member of the New
Zealand Institute of Chartered
Accountants and the Institute of
Directors. Nigel has a Bachelor of
Commerce (majoring in accounting)
and has completed the General
Manager Programme at the
University of Michigan.
Natalie Lombe
GENERAL MANAGER
HUMAN RESOURCES
Natalie joined Synlait Milk in
January 2011 and is responsible for
leading initiatives to develop fully
enabled and engaged staff as well
as facilitation of strategic planning
process. Natalie also oversees the
human resource, payroll and health
and safety functions.
Prior to joining Synlait Milk, Natalie
held senior human resource
positions with Christchurch
International Airport, Goodman
Fielder, Mainland Products and
Allied Telesys, together with
extensive human resource and
change management experience
working in a number of fast moving
consumer goods industries in
Australia.
Natalie holds a Post Graduate
Diploma in Dispute Resolution and
a Bachelor of Business majoring
in human resources and industrial
relations and is a member of the
Human Resources Institute of New
Zealand.
MANAGER
Michael joined Synlait Milk in
August 2011 and brings significant
strategic and operational
experience having spent the
previous 10 years in marketing and
management roles across a broad
range of industries operating in
both the public and private sectors.
Michael is responsible for providing
strategic leadership for all areas of
Synlait Milk’s marketing and
communications, including brand
development and management,
advertising, media and PR,
marketing collateral, events,
sponsorship and corporate
citizenship.
Michael holds a First Class Honours
degree in Management, a Bachelor
of Commerce and Administration
majoring in marketing and
management and a Bachelor of
Arts majoring in Economics. He
is also a member of the Marketing
Association of New Zealand and
a Professional Member of the
Chartered Institute of Marketing UK.
Neil Betteridge
GENERAL MANAGER MANUfACTURING
Neil joined Synlait Milk in 2007 after
10 years with Fonterra. Neil currently
leads a manufacturing team of more
than 80 people and is responsible
for the execution of sound
manufacturing processes across the
entire Synlait Milk plant. He also
leads the development of our Infant
Formula and Nutritional product
manufacturing capabilities. Neil has
been involved with the design and
construction of the various phases of
the Synlait Milk site.
Since completing a Bachelor of
Chemical & Process Engineering
with honours from the University
of Canterbury and a Post
Graduate Diploma in Dairy
Science & Technology, Neil’s
career has included working with
manufacturing processes for a
variety of dairy products.
Neil is a member of the New
Zealand Institute of Food Science
and Technology and a Chartered
Professional Engineer.
page 43
i
OUR FInAnCIAL REVIEW
Our revenue for FY13 at $420
million was up 11.5% on last year’s
$377 million which was primarily
due to the higher volume of
products shipped. Total volume
shipped for FY13 being 86,746
MT against last year’s 77,415 MT.
However, revenue was slightly
down on our prospectus forecast
of $426 million due to slightly lower
infant and nutritional product sales
than anticipated.
Overall our gross profit at $65.1 million was up 42% on last
years $46 million due to the higher product margins we
achieved on both our ingredient and infant and nutritional
product categories. This was in line with our prospectus
forecast margin at $64.6 million.
In the determination of our gross profit the largest impact is
the cost of milk purchased, which represents 78% of our total
cost of sales against all products manufactured. Our final
average base milk price for the season was $5.81 per kg MS,
which compares with last season’s average base milk price
of $6.14 per kg MS. In addition, we paid $0.08 per kg MS in
seasonal and value-added premiums to increase the average
total milk price to $5.89 per kg MS compared with last years
$6.22 per kg MS.
EBITDA at $38.5 million was up 74% on last years $22.1
million and in line with our prospectus forecast of $37.5
million. The significant uplift on last year’s EBITDA being
driven by the gross increase in profit and well controlled
The reduction in infant and nutritional sales at 5,661 MT
overhead costs.
against 6,888 MT forecast was primarily due to the impact
of impending changes in Chinese Government regulations
associated with infant products. This caused many of our
Chinese based customers to put orders on hold while they
came to terms with the impact of the impending changes
in the regulatory environment in China. This is anticipated
to only have a short term impact on of our sales of infant
nutritional products into this market.
It is noted that almost all our products are exported and are
transacted in US dollars. As a result our financial performance
can be significantly affected by the difference between our
annual average NZ dollar exchange rate against the US dollar,
when compared with the annual average NZ dollar exchange
rate applied in the calculation of the farm gate milk price. For
the year ended 31 July 2013 our annual average NZ dollar: US
Net finance costs at $12.3 million were up on last years $9.2
million and in line with our prospectus forecast of $12.4
million. The increase over last year being mainly caused by
the result of bearing the interest expense impact associated
with the build of our second dryer for a full year. In addition,
we experienced $714k of ineffective interest rate swaps,
which resulted from debt repaid on receipt of the net Initial
Public Offering proceeds.
Our NPAT at $11.5m was 161% above FY12 at $4.4 million and
slightly ahead of our prospectus forecast at $10.8 million. The
improvement over our forecast NPAT was due to a combination
of the after tax net benefit of the insurance proceeds we
received related to earthquake damage on our plant of $700k,
plus slightly higher margins on our product sales.
dollar exchange rate was 0.8043 and this was applied against
This result delivered a basic and diluted earnings per share
$290 million of net US dollar receipts.
(EPS) of 19.74 cents, on a weighted average basis, against 8.59
cents in FY12. It also generated a pre-tax return on average
page 44 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013capital employed (ROCE) of 13.1% compared with 7.3% in
FY12. It is noted that the FY13 ROCE was calculated after
adjusting down our year end net debt by $34.6m related to
one off items that are discussed further below.
capital raise and debt
refinancing
cash flow
We had a net cash outflow for operating activities for the
year of $13.8 million (FY12 net cash inflow of $29.8 million).
The primary causes of the net cash outflow were due to a
number of one off items, the primary cause being the increase
in our advance rates paid to our farm milk suppliers above
the level that we would normally have paid. The increase was
In support of the Company’s growth strategy we embarked on
made due to competitive pressure associated with the severe
a capital raising process in combination with a refinancing of
drought conditions experienced throughout New Zealand over
our bank facilities in the last quarter of FY13. This resulted in
the summer months and increased our cash outflows by $20.5
the Company raising $68.9m of new capital after share issue
million in the period to 31 July 2013. There were also impacts
costs. In addition, we also negotiated new Bank facilities with
on our trade finance facility related to higher commodity
our existing Bank syndicate to assist with the funding of our
prices and product shipments in the last quarter of FY13 of
growth initiative programme over the next three years.
approximately $14.1 million. The total of these one off items at
The impact of our capital raise enabled us to pay down
$38.8 million are all expected to unwind during FY14.
existing debt facilities and finish the year with a gearing ratio
Our net debt position as at the end of FY13 at $105.6 million
of 39.2% compared with FY12’s ratio of 55.4%. This provides
was slightly lower than our prospectus forecast net debt of
a strong balance sheet position to embark on our growth
$107.1 million, which was dominated by final payment for
initiative programme where we have forecast to invest $186
Dryer 2. These amounts being prior to the adjustment for $34.6
million in 6 core projects over the next three years. The largest
million of one off items, noted above, which caused our year
of these projects is the build of our third dryer at an estimated
end net debt to be higher than would normally be expected.
cost of $103.5 million with the build due to start in the last
quarter of FY14 and be commissioned at the start of the FY16.
The new finance facilities package includes a $75 million
revolver term loan to be used for all the growth initiative
projects except the build of the dryer 3, which will be financed
by a $110 million term loan. In addition, we have a seasonal
working capital facility of $85 million. The revolver term loan
expires at the end of FY16; the dryer 3 term loan expires at
the end of FY17, while the working capital facility is renewed
capital eXpenditure
We had a reasonably light year for investment in capital items
with a total spend of only $6.6 million, compared to $36.0
million in FY12. There has been some initial expenditure
($1.4 million) associated with the build of our lactoferrin plant
which is on schedule to be completed by January 2014. The
majority of the balance of capital expenditure was related to
the purchase of on farm vats as well as enhancements to our
on an annual basis. We have negotiated very competitive
fees and margins and have commercial banking covenants
plant.
in place. We were in compliance with all of our banking
covenants at the end of July 2013.
page 45
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ItHe FinanciaLs
OUR VALUE
In DOLLARs
AnD CEnTs
page 46 i Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 IsynLAIT MILK LIMITED FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDED 31 JULy 2013
contents
Directors’ Responsibility Statement
Financial statements
Statement of Comprehensive Income
Statement of Changes in Equity
Statement of Financial Position
Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the financial statements
1 Reporting Entity
2 Basis of preparation
3 Summary of significant accounting policies
4 Change in accounting policies
5 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
6 Segment information
7 Revenue
8 Expenses
9 Finance Income and Expenses
10 Income tax
11 Current assets - Cash and cash equivalents
12 Current assets - Trade and other receivables
13 Current assets - Inventories
14 Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment
15 Non-current assets - Intangible assets
16 Trade and other payables
17 Advances from Subsidiary
18 Loans and Borrowings
19 Deferred tax assets and liabilities
20 Share Capital
21 Reserves and retained earning
22 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash inflow from operating activities
23 Financial risk management
24 Derivatives
25 Contingencies
26 Commitments
27 Related party transactions
28 Investments in subsidiaries
29 Comparison of Prospective Financial Information
30 Events occurring after the reporting period
Auditors’ report
page
48
49
50
52
53
54
54
54
60
61
62
62
62
63
63
65
65
66
67
69
70
70
70
71
73
74
74
75
81
81
81
82
84
84
88
89
page 47
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 IDIRECTORs’ DECLARATIOn
As AT 31 JULy 2013
directors’ responsibility statement
The Directors are pleased to present the financial statements for Synlait Milk Limited and its subsidiaries set out on pages 49 to 88
for the year ended 31 July 2013.
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of Synlait
Milk Limited and its subsidiary (together ‘the Group’) as at 31 July 2013 and the financial performance and cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
The Directors consider that the financial statements of the Group have been prepared using appropriate accounting policies,
consistently applied and supported by reasonable judgements and estimates and that all relevant financial reporting and
accounting standards have been followed.
The Directors believe that proper accounting records have been kept which enable, with reasonable accuracy, the determination of
the financial position of the Group and facilitate compliance of the financial statements with the Financial Reporting Act 1993.
For and on behalf of the Board.
Graeme Milne
CHAIRMAN
23 September 2013
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
23 September 2013
page 48 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013sTATEMEnT OF COMpREHEnsIVE InCOME
FOR THE yEAR EnDED 31 JULy 2013
Group
Year ended
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
Notes
7
8
7
8
8
9
9
9
10
14
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Sales and distribution expenses
Administrative and operating expenses
Earnings before net finance expense and income tax
Finance expenses
Finance income
Net finance costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax (expense) / benefit
Net Profit after tax for the period
Other comprehensive income
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently
to profit and loss
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Income tax on income and expenses recognised
directly in equity
Total items that will not be reclassified subsequently
to profit and loss
Items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash
flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred
to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
10
Total items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit and loss
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive income for the year
420,010
376,771
420,010
(354,862)
(330,817)
(354,862)
65,148
1,587
45,954
501
65,148
1,587
(23,478)
(21,337)
(23,478)
(14,978)
28,279
(13,525)
1,272
(12,253)
16,026
(4,498)
11,528
(14,978)
28,279
(13,525)
1,272
(12,253)
16,026
(4,498)
11,528
-
-
-
(11,717)
13,401
(10.626)
1,461
(9,165)
4,236
148
4,384
11,056
(3,048)
8,008
2012
$’000
376,771
(330,817)
45,954
501
(21,337)
(11,717)
13,401
(10,626)
1,461
(9,165)
4,236
148
4,384
-
-
-
11,056
(3,048)
8,008
(3,387)
(1,408)
(1,633)
(1,408)
(337)
169
(1,386)
1,043
(2,681)
(2,681)
8,847
347
(892)
7,116
11,500
845
(2,174)
(2,174)
9,354
169
347
(892)
7,116
11,500
Earnings per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents)
20
19.74
8.59
19.74
8.59
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
page 49
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 IsTATEMEnT OF CHAngEs In EqUITy
FOR THE yEAR EnDED 31 JULy 2013
Notes
4
Share
Capital
$’000
103,648
-
103,648
Group
Equity as at 1 August 2011
Change in accounting policy
Restated Equity at the start of the period
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Income tax on income and expenses
recognised directly in equity
Effective portion of changes in fair value
of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
20
20
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
$’000
1,740
-
1,740
-
-
-
(1,408)
169
347
(892)
-
-
-
$’000
-
-
-
-
11,056
(3,048)
-
-
-
8,008
-
-
-
$’000
(30,570)
(27)
(30,597)
4,384
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
equity
$’000
74,818
(27)
74,791
4,384
11,056
(3,048)
(1,408)
169
347
7,116
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Equity as at 31 July 2012
103,648
848
8,008
(26,213)
86,291
Group
Equity as at 1 August 2012
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Income tax on income and expenses recog-
nised directly in equity
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2013
Notes
Share
Capital
$’000
103,648
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
20
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
172,548
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
$’000
848
$’000
8,008
-
-
-
(3,387)
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$’000
(26,213)
11,528
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,833)
8,008
(14,685)
Total
equity
$’000
86,291
11,528
-
-
(3,387)
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
164,038
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
page 50 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013sTATEMEnT OF CHAngEs In EqUITy
FOR THE yEAR EnDED 31 JULy 2013
Notes
4
Share
Capital
$’000
103,648
-
103,648
Parent
Equity as at 1 August 2011
Change in accounting policy
Restated Equity at the start of the period
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Income tax on income and expenses
recognised directly in equity
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
20
20
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
$’000
1,740
-
1,740
-
-
-
(1,408)
169
347
(892)
-
-
-
$’000
-
-
-
-
11,056
(3,048)
-
-
-
8,008
-
-
-
$’000
(30,570)
(27)
(30,597)
4,384
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
equity
$’000
74,818
(27)
74,791
4,384
11,056
(3,048)
(1,408)
169
347
7,116
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Equity as at 31 July 2012
103,648
848
8,008
(26,213)
86,291
Parent
Equity as at 1 August 2012
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Income tax on income and expenses
recognised directly in equity
Effective portion of changes in fair value
of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2013
Notes
Share
Capital
$’000
103,648
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
20
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
172,548
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
$’000
848
$’000
8,008
-
-
-
(1,633)
(1,386)
845
(2,174)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$’000
(26,213)
11,528
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,326)
8,008
(14,685)
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
Total
equity
$’000
86,291
11,528
-
-
(1,633)
(1,386)
845
(2,174)
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
164,545
page 51
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 IsTATEMEnT OF FInAnCIAL pOsITIOn
As AT 31 JULy 2013
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Goods and services tax refundable
Income accruals and prepayments
Inventories
Current tax receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in subsidiary
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Working capital facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Advances from subsidiary
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Advances from subsidiary
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity
Share capital
Reserves
Retained earnings/(deficit)
Total equity attributable to equity holders
of the Company
Total equity and liabilities
Group
2013
$’000
Notes
11
12
13
24
14
15
28
24
18
16
18
17
18
24
18
19
24
17
20
21
2,365
59,134
2,917
570
65,025
-
1,138
131,149
210,780
4,052
-
86
214,918
346,067
33,079
57,535
46,924
-
-
4,379
141,917
27,917
11,755
440
-
40,112
182,029
172,548
6,175
(14,685)
164,038
346,067
2012
$’000
666
20,884
3,492
159
30,747
231
4,109
60,288
214,099
2,871
-
-
Parent
2013
$’000
31,487
59,134
2,917
570
65,025
-
1,138
160,271
210,780
4,052
1
-
216,970
277,258
214,833
375,104
2,344
70,620
13,617
-
21,000
2,582
-
57,421
46,924
63,926
-
2,980
110,163
171,251
70,768
8,302
1,734
-
80,804
190,967
103,648
8,856
(26,213)
86,291
277,258
-
11,953
-
27,355
39,308
210,559
172,548
6,682
(14,685)
164,545
375,104
2012
$’000
666
20,884
3,492
159
30,747
231
4,109
60,288
214,099
2,871
-
-
216,970
277,258
2,344
70,620
13,617
-
21,000
2,582
110,163
70,768
8,302
1,734
-
80,804
190,967
103,648
8,856
(26,213)
86,291
277,258
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
page 52 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013sTATEMEnT OF CAsH FLOWs
FOR THE yEAR EnDED 31 JULy 2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers
Cash paid for milk purchased
Cash paid to other creditors and employees
Goods and services tax refunds
Income tax refunds
Group
Year ended
2013
$’000
Notes
415,907
(289,268)
(141,231)
575
229
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from operating activities
22
(13,788)
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of intangible assets
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of shares (net)
Repayments of borrowings
Receipt of borrowings
Interest paid
Movement in advances from subsidiary
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
11
1,272
(6,437)
(1,607)
(6,772)
68,900
(33,786)
670
(13,525)
-
22,259
1,699
666
2,365
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
414,859
(289,268)
(141,345)
575
229
(14,950)
1,272
(7,989)
(55)
(6,772)
68,900
(94,782)
670
(13,525)
91,280
52,543
30,821
666
31,487
2012
$’000
399,048
(262,264)
(107,977)
1,003
10
29,820
53
(29,499)
(3,260)
(32,706)
-
(8,656)
27,947
(8,063)
-
11,228
8,342
(7,676)
666
2012
$’000
399,048
(262,264)
(107,977)
1,003
10
29,820
53
(29,499)
(3,260)
(32,706)
-
(8,656)
27,947
(8,063)
-
11,228
8,342
(7,676)
666
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
page 53
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
1 reporting entity
Synlait Milk Limited (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiary
(together ‘the Group’) is domiciled in New Zealand, registered
under the Companies Act 1993 and listed on the New Zealand
Stock Exchange. The Company is an issuer for the purposes of
the Financial Reporting Act 1993 and its financial statements
comply with that Act.
Synlait Milk Limited is primarily involved in the manufacture
and sale of milk powder and milk powder related products.
are considered when assessing whether the Group controls
another entity. The Group also assesses existence of control
where it does not have more than 50% of the voting power but
is able to govern the financial and operating policies by virtue
of de-facto control.
In June 2013 a subsidiary, Synlait Milk Finance Limited, was
set up primarily for holding all banking facilities for the Group
and related interest rate swaps. Funding is loaned to Synlait
Milk Limited and appropriate interest is charged.
2 basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice
(NZ GAAP). They comply with New Zealand equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS), and
other applicable New Zealand Financial Reporting Standards,
as appropriate for profit-oriented entities. They also comply
with International Financial Reporting Standards.
The Company and Group have previously applied NZ IFRS
with differential reporting exemptions but in the 2013 financial
year, since becoming an issuer, the Company and Group now
apply full NZ IFRS. The only differential reporting exemptions
applied in the past related to disclosure requirements.
These consolidated financial statements have been approved
for issue by the Board of Directors on 23 September 2013.
Basis of Measurement
These financial statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis except for the following:
- Revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets
- Financial assets and liabilities (including derivative
instruments) at fair value
- Land, buildings, plant and equipment
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with NZ
IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates.
It also requires management to exercise its judgement in
the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The
areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
financial statements, are disclosed in note 5.
(a) principles of consolidation
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has
the power to govern the financial and operating policies
generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one
half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential
voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible
(b) segment reporting
The Company and Group operate in one industry, being the
manufacture and sale of milk powder and milk powder related
products. The Board makes resource allocation decisions based
on expected cash flows and results of the Company’s operations
as a whole and the Group therefore has one segment.
Although the Group exports to many different countries, for
management reporting purposes the Company and Group
operate in one principal geographical area being New Zealand.
3 summary of significant accounting
policies
(a) foreign currency translation
(i) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of the Company
and the Group are measured using the currency of the primary
economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the
functional currency’). The financial statements are presented
in New Zealand Dollars ($), which is the Company’s functional
currency and are rounded to the nearest thousand ($000).
(ii) Transactions and balances
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the
functional currency at the exchange rates at the dates of the
transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the
functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.
(b) revenue recognition
(i) Sales of goods
Revenue from the sale of goods is measured at the fair value
of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns,
discounts and allowances. Revenue is recognised when
the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is
probable, and the associated costs and possible return of
goods can be estimated reliably.
Transfers of risks and rewards vary depending on the
individual terms of the contract of sale.
page 54 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(ii) Interest income
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest
method. When a loan or receivable is impaired, the Company
and Group reduces the carrying amount to its recoverable
amount, being the estimated future cash flow discounted
at the original effective interest rate of the instrument, and
continues unwinding the discount as interest income. Interest
income on impaired loans and receivables is recognised using
the original effective interest rate.
(c) government grants
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair value
where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant will
be received and the Company or Group will comply with all
attached conditions.
Government grants relating to costs are deferred and
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income over the
period necessary to match them with the costs that they are
intended to compensate.
(d) research and development
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the
prospect of obtaining new scientific or technical knowledge
and understanding, is recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income as an expense when it is incurred.
longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
Tax consolidation group
Synlait Milk Limited and its wholly-owned New Zealand
controlled entities form a tax consolidation group.
(f) goods and services tax (gst)
The profit and loss component of the statements of
comprehensive income have been prepared so that all
components are stated exclusive of GST. All items in the
financial position are stated net of GST, with the exception of
receivables and payables, which include GST invoiced.
(g) leases
Leases on terms where the Company or Group assumes
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are
classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition, the leased
asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair
value and the present value of the minimum lease payments
with a corresponding liability to the lessor included in the
statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in
accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.
Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and
reduction in the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
(e) income tax
The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred
tax. Tax is recognised in the statement of comprehensive
income, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised
in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this
case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income
or directly in equity, respectively.
Other leases are operating leases and the leased assets are not
recognised on the Company or Group’s statement of financial
position. Operating lease payments are recognised as an
expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except
where another systematic basis is more representative of the
time pattern over which economic benefits from leased assets
are consumed.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income
for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted
at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in
respect of previous years.
(h) impairment of non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Company and Group’s
non-financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date to
determine whether there is any indication of impairment.
Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method,
providing for temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax is not recognised for the revaluation of land to
the extent that any revaluation is unlikely to affect the tax
base of the asset. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates
that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences
when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted
or substantively enacted by the reporting date. A deferred tax
asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future
taxable profits will be available against which the temporary
difference can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at
each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of
an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable
amount. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable
asset group that generates cash flows that are largely
independent from other assets and groups. Impairment losses
are recognised in profit or loss.
Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating
units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying
amount of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro
rata basis.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit
is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
page 55
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows
are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value
of money and the risks specific to the asset.
cost includes an appropriate share of production overheads
based on normal operating capacity. Net realisable value is the
estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less
the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed
at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has
decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed
if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine
the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only
to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed
the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of
depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been
recognised.
- cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, call
deposits that are repayable on demand and form an integral
part of the Company and Group’s cash management.
- trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for
merchandise sold or services performed in the ordinary course
of business. If collection is expected in one year or less (or
in the normal operating cycle of the business if longer), they
are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as
non-current assets.
The recoverable amount of the Company and Group’s
receivables which are carried at amortised cost is calculated
as the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted
at the original effective interest rate (i.e. the effective interest
rate computed at initial recognition of these financial assets).
Receivables with a short duration are not discounted.
Impairment losses on an individual basis are determined by an
evaluation of the exposures on an instrument by instrument
basis. All individual instruments that are considered significant
are subject to this approach.
For trade receivables which are not significant on an individual
basis, impairment is assessed on a portfolio basis based on
numbers of days overdue, and taking into account the historical
loss experienced in portfolios with a similar amount of days
overdue.
(k) inventories
(i) Raw materials and stores, work in progress and
finished goods
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable
value on a first in, first out basis. The cost of inventories
includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories
and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In
the case of manufactured inventories and work in progress,
-
investments in subsidiaries and associates
Investments in subsidiaries and associates in the Parent
financial statements are stated at cost less impairment.
(m) investments and other financial assets
Classification
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following
categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and
receivables, and available for sale. The classification depends
on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired.
Management determines the classification of its financial
assets at initial recognition.
(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial
assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this
category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the
short term. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading
unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category
are classified as current assets if expected to be settled within
12 months, otherwise they are classified as non-current.
(ii) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with
fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an
active market. They are included in current assets, except for
maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting
period. These are classified as non-current assets. The Group’s
loans and receivables comprise ‘trade and other receivables’
and ‘cash and cash equivalents’ in the statement of financial
position (notes 3(i) and (j)).
(iii) Available for sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are
either designated in this category or not classified in any of the
other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless
the investment matures or management intends to dispose of it
within 12 months of the end of the reporting period.
Recognition and measurement
A financial instrument is recognised if the Company or
Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the
instrument. Financial assets are derecognised if the contractual
rights to the cash flows from the financial assets expire or if the
Company or Group transfers the financial asset to another party
without retaining control or substantially all risks and rewards
of the asset. Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are
accounted for at trade date, i.e. the date that the Company or
page 56 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Group commits itself to purchase or sell the asset. Financial
liabilities are derecognised if the Company or Group’s
obligations specified in the contract expire or are discharged
or cancelled.
Impairment of financial assets
(i) assets carried at amortised cost
The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period
whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or
group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a
group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses
are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment
as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial
recognition of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event
(or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows
of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be
reliably estimated.
Evidence of impairment may include indications that the
debtors or a group of debtors is experiencing significant
financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or
principal payments, the probability that they will enter
bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation, and where
observable data indicates that there is a measurable decrease
in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears
or economic conditions that correlate with defaults.
For the loans and receivables category, the amount of the loss
is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying
amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows
(excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred)
discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest
rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced and the
amount of the loss is recognised in the consolidated statement
of comprehensive income. If a loan or held-to-maturity
investment has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for
measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest
rate determined under the contract.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss
decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an
event occurring after the impairment was recognised (such as
an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), the reversal of
the previously recognised impairment loss is recognised in the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
(ii) Assets classified as available for sale
The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period
whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a
group of financial assets is impaired. For debt securities, the
Group uses the criteria referred to in (i) above. In the case of
equity investments classified as available for sale, a significant
or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below
its cost is also evidence that the assets are impaired. If any
such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets, the
cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the
acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment
loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit
or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in profit
or loss. Impairment losses recognised in the statements of
comprehensive income on equity instruments are not reversed
through the statements of comprehensive income. If, in a
subsequent period, the fair value of a debt instrument classified
as available for sale increases and the increase can be
objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment
loss was recognised in profit or loss, the impairment loss is
reversed through the statements of comprehensive income.
(n) derivatives
The Company and Group enters into a variety of derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate
and foreign exchange rate risk, including forward exchange
contracts and interest rate swaps.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date
a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently
remeasured to their fair value at each balance date, The
resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately
unless the derivative is designated as effective as a hedging
instrument, in which event the timing of the recognition in
profit or loss depends on the nature of the hedge relationship.
Hedges of highly probable forecast transactions or hedges of
foreign currency risk of firm commitments are designated as
cash flow hedges by the Company or Group.
The full fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as a
non-current asset or liability when the remaining hedged
item is more than 12 months, and as a current asset or liability
when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than
12 months. Trading derivatives are classified as a current asset
or liability.
(i) Hedge accounting
The Company and Group designates certain hedging
instruments in respect of foreign currency risk as cash flow
hedges. Hedges of foreign currency exchange risk on firm
commitments are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
At the inception of the hedge relationship, the Company
or Group documents the relationship between the hedging
instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk
management objectives and its strategy for undertaking
various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of
the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company or Group
documents whether the hedging instrument that is used in a
hedging relationship is highly effective in offsetting changes in
fair values or cash flows of the hedged item.
page 57
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(ii) Cash flow hedge
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives
that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are
recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated
as a separate component of equity in the hedging reserve. The
gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised
immediately in profit or loss, and is included in Finance costs.
Amounts recognised in the hedging reserve are classified from
equity to profit or loss (as a reclassification adjustment) in the
periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss, in
the same line as the recognised hedged item.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Company
or Group revokes the hedging relationships, the hedging
instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no
longer qualifies as hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain or
loss recognised in the hedging reserve at that time remains
in equity and is recognised when the forecast transaction
is ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast
transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative
gain or loss that was recognised in the hedging reserve is
immediately recorded in profit or loss.
(iii) Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge
accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative
instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting are
recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive
income.
(o) fair value estimation
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities
must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for
disclosure purposes.
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active
markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading
and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market
prices at the balance date. The quoted market price used for
financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price; the
appropriate quoted market price for financial liabilities is the
current ask price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in
an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives)
is determined using valuation techniques. The Company and
Group use a variety of methods and makes assumptions that
are based on market conditions existing at each balance date.
Other techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows,
are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial
instruments.
(p) property, plant and equipment
Recognition and measurement
Property, plant and equipment are initially measured at cost
less accumulated depreciation.
Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the
acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets
includes the cost of materials and direct labour, any other
costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working
condition for its intended use, and the costs of dismantling and
removing the items and restoring the site on which they are
located.
When a self-constructed asset meets the definition of a
qualifying asset under NZ IAS 23 ‘Borrowing Costs’, borrowing
costs directly attributable to the construction of the asset are
capitalised until such a time as the asset is substantially ready
for its intended use or sale.
When major components of an item of property, plant and
equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for
as separate items of property, plant and equipment.
Revaluations
Land is stated at market valuation as determined on a cyclical
basis, not exceeding three years, by an independent registered
valuer. Buildings and plant and equipment are stated at
valuation as determined on a cyclical basis, not exceeding
three years, by an independent registered valuer the basis
of which valuation is the depreciated replacement cost
method. Any increase in the value of land, buildings, plant and
equipment is recognised in other comprehensive income and
presented in the revaluation reserve in equity unless it offsets
a previous decrease in value recognised in the profit or loss, in
which case it is recognised in the profit or loss. A decrease in
value is recognised in the profit or loss where it exceeds the
increase previously recognised in equity.
Subsequent costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and
equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item
if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied
within the part will flow to the Company or the Group and its
cost can be measured reliably. The costs of the day-to-day
servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in
profit or loss as incurred.
Depreciation
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment purchased on
new acquisitions is recognised in profit or loss on a straight
line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an
item of property, plant and equipment.
Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease
term and their useful lives. Land is not depreciated.
The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative
periods are as follows:
page 58 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
- Buildings
- Plant and equipment
- Fixtures and fittings
10 - 50 years
3 - 33 years
2 - 20 years
value is recognised in the profit and loss component of the
statement of comprehensive income over the period of the
borrowings using the effective interest method.
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are
reassessed at the reporting date.
(q) intangible assets
(i) Trademarks
Separately acquired trademarks are shown at historical
cost. Trademarks acquired in a business combination are
recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Trademarks
have an indefinite useful life and are carried at cost and are not
amortised subject to annual impairment test.
(ii) Computer software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the
basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the
specific software. These costs are amortised on a straight line
basis over their estimated useful lives of three to ten years.
Costs associated with maintaining computer software
programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred.
Development costs that are directly attributable to the design
and testing of identifiable and unique software products
controlled by the Company and Group are recognised as
intangible assets.
(iii) Customer contracts
Customer contracts acquired as part of a business combination
are recognised separately from goodwill. Customer contracts
have a finite life and are carried at their fair value at the date
of acquisition less accumulated amortisation and impairment
losses. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line
method based on the timing of projected cash flows of the
contracts over their estimated useful lives, which currently
vary from one to three years.
(r) trade and other payables
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services
that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business
from suppliers. Accounts payable are classified as current
liabilities if payment is due within one year or less (or in the
normal operating cycle of the business if longer). If not, they
are presented as non-current liabilities.
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair
value plus any directly attributable transaction costs and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method.
(s) interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing liabilities are recognised initially at fair value,
net of transaction costs incurred. Interest bearing liabilities are
subsequently carried at amortised cost; any difference between
the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption
(t) employee benefits
(i) Defined contribution plan
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension
plans, including KiwiSaver, are recognised as an expense in
the profit or loss when they are due.
(ii) Profit‑sharing and bonus plans
Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an
undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is
provided.
A provision is recognised for the amount expected to be paid
under short-term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the
Company has a present legal or constructive obligation to
pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the
employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
(u) share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new
ordinary shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction
from the proceeds.
Where any Group company purchases the Company’s equity
share capital (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including
any directly attributable incremental costs is deducted from
equity attributable to the Company’s equity holders until the
shares are cancelled or reissued. Where such ordinary shares
are subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net of
any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the
related income tax effects, is included in equity attributable to
the Company’s equity holders.
(v) earnings per share
The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by
dividing the profit or loss attributable to shareholders by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or
loss attributable to shareholders and the number of shares
outstanding to include the effects of all potential dilutive shares.
(w) borrowing costs
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition,
construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets
that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for
their intended use, are added to the cost of those assets, until
such time as the assets are substantially ready for use.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the
period in which they are incurred.
page 59
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(x) standards, amendments, and interpretations
effective in 2012
-
IAS 1 (Amendment), ‘ Financial statement preparation –
presentation of other comprehensive income’ (effective 1
January 2012). The amendment requires profit or loss and
other comprehensive income (OCI) to be presented, either
in a single continuous statement or in two separate but
consecutive statements. There is little noticeable change
from the current requirements. However, the format of the
OCI section is required to be changed to separate items
that might be recycled from items that will not be recycled.
The changes do not affect the measurement of net profit or
earnings per share; however, they change the way items of
OCI are presented.
(y) standards, amendments and interpretations to
existing standards that are not yet effective
Certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to
existing standards have been published that are mandatory for
the Group’s accounting periods beginning on or after 1 August
2013 or later periods but which the Group has not early adopted:
- NZ IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments: Classification and
measurement’ (effective 1 January 2015). NZ IFRS 9
amends the requirements related to the classification and
measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities.
This standard becomes effective in the Group’s 2016
financial statements. The Group does not plan to adopt
this standard early and the extent of the impact has not yet
been determined.
-
IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’, NZ IFRS 11
Joint Arrangements, NZ IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests
in Other Entities, revised NZ IAS 27 Separate Financial
Statements and NZ IAS 28 Investments in Associates and
Joint Ventures (effective 1 January 2013).
- NZ IFRS 10 develops a single consolidation model
applicable to all investees. The standard provides that
an investor consolidates an investee when it has power,
exposure to variability in returns, and a linkage between the
two. This standard becomes effective in the Group’s 2014
financial statements. The Group does not plan to adopt
this standard early and the extent of the impact has not yet
been determined.
-
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements. This standard separates the
arrangement into either a joint operation or joint venture.
If the arrangement is a joint operation then the joint
operation is consolidated in relation to its interest in the
joint operation. If the arrangement is a joint venture then
the joint venturer recognises an investment and accounts
for that investment using the equity method. This standard
becomes effective in the Group’s 2014 financial statements.
The Group does not plan to adopt this standard early and
there will be no impact on the financial statements from the
change in standard.
-
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. This
standard replaces existing requirements for disclosure of
subsidiaries and joint ventures (now joint arrangements),
and makes limited amendments in relation to associates.
The standard becomes effective in the Group’s 2014
financial statements. The Group does not plan to adopt
this standard early and there will be no impact on the
recognition or measurement of the financial statements
from the change in standard.
- NZ IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (effective 1 January
2013). NZ IFRS 13 provides a framework for determining
fair value and clarifies the factors to be considered in
estimating fair value in accordance with IFRS. It provides
guidance on certain valuation approaches and techniques.
The standard becomes effective in the Group’s 2014
financial statements. The Group does not plan to adopt
this standard early and the extent of the impact has not yet
been determined.
- There are no other standards that are not yet effective and
that are expected to have a material impact on the entity in
the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable
future transactions.
(z) comparative balances
Comparative balances have been reclassified and restated
to conform with changes in presentation and classification
adopted in the current period. (Note 4)
4 change in accounting policies
Adoption of Monthly Milk Price
During the year ended 31 July 2013, the Company changed it’s
accounting policy for calculating the value of inventory from
the Annual Milk Price to the Monthly Milk Price. The cost of
dairy product manufactured from milk is established by using
the Monthly Milk Price calculated for the month when the
dairy product was manufactured. The Monthly Milk Price is
determined using a milk pricing model and is benchmarked
against the Farmgate Milk Price announcements during the
year and against the farmgate milk price statement when this
is released annually.
The change in milk price methodology is a change in
measurement basis from an average cost inventory approach
to a First In First Out basis. This has been done to align with
industry best practice and because it enhances comparability.
The Directors have determined that this change in
measurement basis constitutes a change in accounting policy
and therefore the comparative periods have been restated.
page 60 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
The comparative figures for the period ended 31 July 2012
have been restated using the Monthly Milk Price methodology.
The restatement has reduced reported NPAT by $1.9 million,
resulting in an adjusted NPAT of $4.4 million both for the Group
The impact of the restatement of the monthly milk price
adjustment on the opening Financial Position at 1 August
2011 was a lower retained earnings of $27k, $38k reduction in
inventory and $11k of deferred tax.
and the Company.
Statement of Comprehensive Income For the year ending 31 July 2013
2012
Original
2012
Restated
Variance
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross Profit
Other income
Other expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax
Profit after tax
Statement of Financial Position For the year ending 31 July 2013
Inventories
Other current assets
Non-current assets
Total assets
Trade and other payables
Other current liabilities
Deferred tax
Other non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Current profit
Retained earnings
Other Equity
Total equity
5 critical accounting estimates
and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are
based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances.
(a) critical accounting estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with NZ IFRS requires management to make
judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of accounting policies and the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may
differ from these estimates and assumptions.
$’000
376,771
$’000
376,771
(328,143)
(330,817)
48,628
45,954
501
501
(42,219)
(42,219)
6,910
(600)
6,310
33,841
29,541
216,970
280,352
(71,002)
(39,543)
(9,061)
(72,502)
4,236
148
4,384
30,747
29,541
216,970
277,258
(70,620)
(39,543)
(8,302)
(72,502)
(192,108)
(190,967)
(6,310)
30,570
(4,384)
30,597
(112,504)
(112,504)
$’000
-
2,674
2,674
-
-
2,674
(748)
1,926
3,094
-
-
3,094
(382)
-
(759)
-
(1,141)
(1,926)
(27)
-
(88,244)
(86,291)
(1,953)
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an on-going
basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in
the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future
periods affected.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty relate to assessment of
impairment of inventory, standard costs used for measuring
inventory and the industry milk price.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable
value. Estimates are required in relation to net realisable value
which is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling
expenses. Reviewing the net realisable values is carried out by
management on a periodic basis and any reduction to cost is
provided by way of stock provision.
page 61
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
The use of a standard cost methodology for inventory requires management estimation in determining the Monthly Milk Price to
be applied which forms a key component of the product standard cost.
The estimate of the industry milk price is a key assumption applied by management in the financial statements. This industry price
is used for milk purchased or received from other processors during the year.
6. segment information
(a) description of segments
The Company and Group operate in one industry, being the manufacture and sale of milk powder and milk powder related
products. The Board makes resource allocation decisions based on expected cash flows and results of the Company’s operations
as a whole and the Group therefore has one segment.
Although the Group exports to many different countries, for management reporting purposes the Company and Group operate in
one principal geographical area being New Zealand.
Revenues of approximately 56% are derived from the top three external customers.
7 reVenue
Milk powder and milk powder related products
Total Revenue
Insurance proceeds
Other sundry income
Management fees
Total other income
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
420,010
420,010
1,304
245
38
1,587
2012
$’000
376,771
376,771
-
388
113
501
2013
$’000
420,010
420,010
1,304
245
38
1,587
2012
$’000
376,771
376,771
-
388
113
501
The insurance proceeds relate to minor damage caused by the earthquake in September 2010. Repair costs to date associated
with this damage total $596,211 and are included in Repairs and Maintenance within Cost of Sales. Remaining repairs are to be
completed during the 2014 financial year.
8 eXpenses
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
8,966
6,589
3,109
1,216
54
312
1,355
364
2012
$’000
7,697
4,745
2,151
970
10
1,076
1,098
85
2013
$’000
8,966
6,589
3,109
1,216
54
312
1,355
364
2012
$’000
7,697
4,745
2,151
970
10
1,076
1,098
85
The following items of expenditure are included
in cost of sales
Depreciation and Amortisation
Employee benefit expense
Repairs and maintenance
The following items of expenditure are included in sales and
distribution expenses
Depreciation
Donations
Research and development
Rent expense
Repairs and maintenance
page 62 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
The following items of expenditure are included in
administrative and operating expenses
Employee benefit expense
Defined benefit contributions - KiwiSaver
Directors fees
Deloitte services included in administrative
operating expenses and share capital
Audit
IPO
Taxation advice
Financial modelling assurance
Other
Total
7,010
138
346
105
473
121
215
40
954
5,913
76
327
125
-
29
535
213
902
7,010
138
346
105
473
121
215
40
954
5,913
76
375
125
-
29
535
213
902
Research and development expenses have decreased substantially from last year. In 2012 these costs contained a portion of
the overhead costs that related to product testing of the special milks dryer. In 2013 the overhead costs were fully allocated to
products.
9 finance income and eXpenses
Interest income on bank deposits
Settlement of ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
Total finance income
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
103
1,169
1,272
2012
$’000
53
1,408
1,461
2013
$’000
103
1,169
1,272
2012
$’000
53
1,408
1,461
Interest and facility fees (net of capitalised interest)
(12,811)
(10,626)
(12,811)
(10,626)
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
Total finance costs
Net finance costs
10 income taX
(a) income tax expense
Current tax on profits for the year
Adjustments in respect of prior years
Total current tax
Temporary differences
Additional prior year tax losses brought forward
Other prior year adjustments
Total deferred tax (note 18)
Income tax (expense) / benefit
(714)
(13,525)
(12,253)
-
(10,626)
(9,165)
(714)
(13,525)
(12,253)
-
(10,626)
(9,165)
Group
Year ended
2013
$’000
-
-
-
(4,498)
-
-
(4,498)
(4,498)
2012
$’000
-
14
14
(1,423)
1,704
(147)
134
148
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
-
-
-
(4,498)
-
-
(4,498)
(4,498)
2012
$’000
-
14
14
(1,423)
1,704
(147)
134
148
page 63
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(b) reconciliation of effective tax rate
Profit before income tax
Income tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate - 28%
Reduction in tax rate of buildings
Tax exempt income
Other non deductible costs
Total permanent differences
Additional prior year tax losses brought forward
Other prior year adjustments
Total prior period adjustments
Total income tax (expense) / benefit
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
16,026
(4,487)
-
-
(11)
(4,498)
-
-
-
(4,498)
Group
Year ended
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
4,236
(1,187)
(41)
(3)
(203)
(1,434)
1,704
(122)
1,582
148
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
16,026
(4,487)
-
-
(11)
(4,498)
-
-
-
(4,498)
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
4,236
(1,187)
(41)
(3)
(203)
(1,434)
1,704
(122)
1,582
148
2012
$’000
(c) imputation credits
Imputation credits at the end of the period
-
231
-
231
(d) income tax recognised in other comprehensive income
The tax (charge)/credit relating to components of other comprehensive income is as follows:
Tax
(expense)/
benefit
Before tax
After tax
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
(3,724)
(3,724)
11,056
(1,239)
9,817
-
(3,019)
(3,019)
-
1,043
1,043
(3,048)
347
(2,701)
-
845
845
-
(2,681)
(2,681)
8,008
(892)
7,116
-
(2,174)
(2,174)
Group
31 July 2013
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
31 July 2012
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
Parent
31 July 2013
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
page 64 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
31 July 2012
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
11 current assets - cash and cash eQuiValents
11,056
(1,239)
9,817
(3,048)
347
(2,701)
Group
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
Parent
2013
$’000
8,008
(892)
7,116
2012
$’000
Cash and cash equivalents
2,365
666
31,487
666
(a) risk exposure
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is discussed in note 23(a). The maximum exposure to credit risk at the end of the
reporting period is the carrying amount of each class of cash and cash equivalents mentioned above.
(b) fair value
The carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents equals their fair value.
12 current assets - trade and other receiVables
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Total receivables
Group
Parent
2013
$’000
59,090
44
59,134
2012
$’000
20,580
304
20,884
2013
$’000
59,090
44
59,134
2012
$’000
20,580
304
20,884
The increase in trade receivables from 2012 is primarily due to a larger number of sales transactions taking place in July 2013
combined with increased commodity prices compared to 2012.
page 65
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(a) impaired receivables
As of 31 July 2013, trade receivables of $3.5m were past due but not impaired. These relate to a number of independent customers
for whom there is no recent history of default. The majority has since been collected but $0.8m remains unpaid which is expected
to be collected in the 2014 financial year.
The ageing analysis of these overdue trade receivables is as follows:
0 to 30 days
30 to 60 days
Total trade receivables
Group
Parent
2013
$’000
391
3,093
3,484
2012
$’000
828
-
828
2013
$’000
391
3,093
3,484
2012
$’000
828
-
828
The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets.
(b) bad and doubtful trade receivables
The Company and Group have recognised no loss (2012: $nil) in respect of bad and doubtful trade receivables during the year
ended 31 July 2013.
(c) trade and other receivables
Accounts receivable are amounts incurred in the normal course of business.
Receivables denominated in other currencies other than the functional currency comprise NZ$47.3 m (2012: $19.3 m) of USD and
Euro denominated trade receivables and accruals.
13 current assets - inVentories
Raw materials and consumables at cost
Finished goods at cost
Total inventories
Group
Parent
2013
$’000
16,047
48,978
65,025
2012
$’000
8,587
22,160
30,747
2013
$’000
16,047
48,978
65,025
2012
$’000
8,587
22,160
30,747
Both raw materials inventory and finished goods inventory increased from last year as higher infant formula product and raw mate-
rials were on hand at the end of the financial year to meet demand at the beginning of the 2014 financial year.
page 66 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
14 non-current assets - property, plant and eQuipment
Group
Cost or valuation
Cost
Revaluation
Balance at 1 August 2011
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification / transfer
Revaluation
Balance at 31 July 2012
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification / transfer
Revaluation
Land
$’000
3,042
-
3,042
-
-
-
170
3,212
5
-
-
-
Buildings
Plant and
equipment
Fixtures and
fittings
Construction
in progress
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Total
$’000
21,723
85,265
-
-
21,723
85,265
4,536
(29)
5,229
1,761
2,439
(13)
95,795
10,272
1,830
-
1,830
566
-
-
-
33,220
193,758
2,396
-
-
-
-
3,290
(195)
75
-
165
-
(152)
-
80,043
191,903
-
80,043
28,450
-
(104,176)
-
4,317
3,132
-
77
-
-
191,903
35,991
(42)
(3,152)
12,203
236,903
6,592
(195)
-
-
Balance at 31 July 2013
3,217
33,220
196,928
2,409
7,526
243,300
Accumulated depreciation
Cost
Balance at 1 August 2011
Depreciation
Disposals
Revaluation
Balance at 31 July 2012
Depreciation
Disposals
Revaluation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,283
2,283
959
(18)
180
3,404
1,110
-
-
10,556
10,556
6,720
(10)
967
18,233
8,360
(40)
-
886
886
281
-
-
1,167
286
-
-
Balance at 31 July 2013
-
4,514
26,553
1,453
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,725
13,725
7,960
(28)
1,147
22,804
9,756
(40)
-
32,520
Carrying amounts
At 31 July 2012
At 31 July 2013
3,212
3,217
29,816
28,706
175,525
170,375
1,229
956
4,317
7,526
214,099
210,780
page 67
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Parent
Cost or valuation
Cost
Revaluation
Balance at 1 August 2011
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification / transfer
Revaluation
Balance at 31 July 2012
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification / transfer
Revaluation
Land
$’000
3,042
-
3,042
-
-
-
170
3,212
5
-
-
-
Buildings
Plant and
equipment
Fixtures and
fittings
Construction
in progress
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Total
$’000
21,553
85,265
-
-
21,553
85,265
4,536
(29)
5,229
1,931
2,439
(13)
95,795
10,272
1,830
-
1,830
566
-
-
-
33,220
193,758
2,396
-
-
-
-
3,290
(195)
75
-
165
-
(152)
-
80,043
191,733
-
80,043
28,450
-
(104,176)
-
4,317
3,132
-
77
-
-
191,733
35,991
(42)
(3,152)
12,373
236,903
6,592
(195)
-
-
Balance at 31 July 2013
3,217
33,220
196,928
2,409
7,526
243,300
Accumulated depreciation
Cost
Balance at 1 August 2011
Depreciation
Disposals
Revaluation
Balance at 31 July 2012
Depreciation
Disposals
Revaluation
Balance at 31 July 2013
Carrying amounts
At 31 July 2012
At 31 July 2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,283
2,283
959
(18)
180
3,404
1,110
-
-
10,556
10,556
6,720
(10)
967
18,233
8,360
(40)
-
886
886
281
-
-
1,167
286
-
-
4,514
26,553
1,453
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,725
13,725
7,960
(28)
1,147
22,804
9,756
(40)
-
32,520
3,212
3,217
29,816
28,706
175,525
170,375
1,229
956
4,317
7,526
214,099
210,780
(a) Valuations of land and buildings
Land, buildings, and plant and equipment were independently valued as at 31 July 2012 by Jones Lang LaSalle using either the
depreciated replacement cost method (for buildings and plant and equipment) or market based valuation (for land). The method
applied by the valuer is described in note 3(p). Land, buildings, and plant and equipment was valued at $208.6m as at 31 July
2012. If the cost model had been used, the carrying value of land, buildings and plant and equipment would have been $197.5m
at 31 July 2012, resulting in a revaluation of $11.1m ($12.2m at cost less accumulated depreciation of $1.1m). There has been no
independent valuation undertaken in 2013.
(b) impairment
During the period, property, plant and equipment have been examined for impairment. No indicators of impairment have been
identified and no material items of property, plant and equipment are considered to be impaired.
(c) construction in progress
Assets under construction includes capital expenditure projects, until they are commissioned and transferred to fixed assets.
page 68 i
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 ISynlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(d) capitalised borrowing costs
During the year, the Group has capitalised borrowing costs amounting to $nil (2012: $2.56m) on qualifying assets.
15 non-current assets - intangible assets
Group
Year ended 31 July 2012
Opening net book amount
Transfer from construction
in progress
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Year ended 31 July 2013
Opening net book amount
Reclassification / transfer
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Parent
Year ended 31 July 2012
Opening net book amount
Transfer from construction
in progress
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Year ended 31 July 2013
Opening net book amount
Reclassification / transfer
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
Patents,
trademarks
and other
rights
Computer
software
$’000
$’000
Brand
$’000
Supplier
contracts
Intangibles
in progress
$’000
$’000
59
-
6
-
65
65
-
8
-
73
-
3,152
-
(619)
2,533
2,533
273
-
(336)
2,470
-
-
102
-
102
102
-
55
-
157
259
-
-
(88)
171
171
-
-
(90)
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
(273)
1,544
-
1,271
Patents,
trademarks
and other
rights
Computer
software
$’000
$’000
Brand
$’000
Supplier
contracts
Intangibles
in progress
$’000
$’000
59
-
6
-
65
65
-
8
-
73
-
3,152
-
(619)
2,533
2,533
273
-
(336)
2,470
-
-
102
-
102
102
-
55
-
157
259
-
-
(88)
171
171
-
-
(90)
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
(273)
1,544
-
1,271
Total
$’000
318
3,152
108
(707)
2,871
2,871
-
1,607
(426)
4,052
Total
$’000
318
3,152
108
(707)
2,871
2,871
-
1,607
(426)
4,052
page 69
Synlait Milk Limted Annual Report 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
16 trade and other payables
Trade payables
Accrued expenses
Employee entitlements
Total trade and other payables
Group
Parent
2013
$’000
31,671
24,199
1,665
57,535
2012
$’000
35,880
33,614
1,126
70,620
2013
$’000
31,671
24,085
1,665
57,421
2012
$’000
35,880
33,614
1,126
70,620
Payables denominated in other currencies other than the functional currency comprise NZ$2.8 m (2012: $4.6 m) of USD and AUD
denominated trade payables and accruals.
17 adVances from subsidiary
Current liabilities
Advances from Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Non current liabilities
Advances from Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Group
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
Parent
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
63,926
63,926
27,355
-
-
-
The term of the advances from subsidiary have been loaned on the same terms as the banking facilities. The interest rates used
are the market rates and therefore the carrying value of the advances represent fair value.
18 loans and borrowings
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
33,079
46,924
-
80,003
28,596
(679)
27,917
2012
$’000
2,344
13,617
21,000
36,961
71,230
(462)
70,768
2013
$’000
-
46,924
-
46,924
-
-
-
2012
$’000
2,344
13,617
21,000
36,961
71,230
(462)
70,768
Current liabilities
Working Capital Facility
Trade Finance Facility
Secured bank loans
Total
Non-current liabilities
Bank loans
Loan facility fees
Total
page 70 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(a) terms of loans and borrowings
The secured bank loans and working capital facility within Synlait Milk Limited are secured under the terms of the General
Security Deed dated 26 June 2013, by which all present and future property is secured to the ANZ National Bank and Bank of New
Zealand.
The working capital facility has a right of offset with the deposit accounts.
The Company facilities include:
- A secured Revolving Credit Facility of $75m that matures on 31 July 2016
- A secured Term Facility of $110m that matures on 31 July 2017 to fund the construction of Dryer 3
- A secured Working Capital Facility of $85m that matures on 31 July 2014 (but expected to be extended annually)
- An unlimited and unsecured Trade Finance Facility from Mitsui & Co. Limited that matures on 31 July 2015
The carrying value of loans and borrowings approximates fair value.
The Group is subject to capital requirements imposed by its bank through covenants agreed as part of the lending facility
arrangements. The Group has met all externally imposed capital requirements for the twelve months ended 31 July 2013 and 31
July 2012.
Nominal
Year of
Carrying
Carrying
Interest rate
%
maturity amount 2013 amount 2012
Secured Revolving Credit Facility - ANZ / BNZ
Secured Working Capital Facility - ANZ / BNZ
Trade Finance Facility - Mitsui & Co. Limited
4.20
3.85
1.45
2016
2014
2015
27,917
33,079
46,924
91,768
2,344
13,617
The nominal interest rate is calculated by adding the BKBM rate and the marginal rate, it excludes line fees and swap costs.
19 deferred taX assets and liabilities
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Assets
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total deferred tax assets
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Total deferred tax liabilities
Total deferred tax
Group
2013
$’000
713
278
4,382
5,373
2012
$’000
-
163
5,641
5,804
Parent
2013
$’000
515
278
4,382
5,175
2012
$’000
-
163
5,641
5,804
(17,108)
(13,760)
(17,108)
(13,760)
-
(20)
(17,128)
(11,755)
(330)
(16)
(14,106)
(8,302)
-
(20)
(17,128)
(11,953)
(330)
(16)
(14,106)
(8,302)
page 71
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Balance
1 Aug 2011
Recognised in
profit or loss
Recognised
in other
comprehensive
income
$’000
(7,643)
(677)
400
2,174
(5,746)
$’000
(3,069)
-
(253)
3,467
145
Balance
31 July 2012
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
$’000
(3,048)
347
-
-
(2,701)
(8,302)
Balance
1 Aug 2012
Recognised in
profit or loss
Recognised
in other
comprehensive
income
Balance
31 July 2013
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
(8,302)
$’000
(3,348)
-
111
(1,259)
(4,496)
$’000
$’000
-
(17,108)
1,043
-
-
713
258
4,382
1,043
(11,755)
Balance
1 Aug 2011
Recognised in
profit or loss
Recognised
in other
comprehensive
income
$’000
(7,643)
(677)
400
2,174
(5,746)
$’000
(3,069)
-
(253)
3,467
145
Balance
31 July 2012
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
$’000
(3,048)
347
-
-
(2,701)
(8,302)
Movements - Group
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
Movements - Parent
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
page 72 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Balance
1 Aug 2012
Recognised in
profit or loss
Recognised
in other
comprehensive
income
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
(8,302)
$’000
(3,348)
-
111
(1,259)
(4,496)
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
20 share capital
(a) share capital
Number of ordinary shares
On issue at beginning of period
Share split
Issue of shares
Total
Balance
31 July 2013
$’000
(17,108)
515
258
4,382
$’000
-
845
-
-
845
(11,953)
2013
Shares
2013
$’000
51,022,858
103,648
61,227,429
34,090,910
146,341,197
-
68,900
172,548
The share split was to ensure there was the desired number of shares in Synlait Milk Limited prior to the IPO.
The issue of new shares were as part of the IPO of the Company on 23 July 2013 and the value reflects gross proceeds less issue
related costs.
The weighted average number of shares during the year is used to calculate the Earnings per Share.
(b) ordinary shares
All issued shares are fully paid and have no par value.
The holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time.
Ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share at meetings of the Company.
All Ordinary Shares rank equally with regard to the Company’s residual assets.
(c) capital risk management
The Company and Group’s capital includes share capital, retained earnings and reserves.
The Company and Group’s policy is to maintain a sound capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence and to
sustain future development of the business. The impact of the level of capital on shareholders’ return is also recognised and the
Company recognised the need to maintain a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with greater gearing and
the advantages and security afforded by a sound capital position.
The Company and Group are subject to various security ratios within the bank facilities agreement.
The Company and Group’s policies in respect of capital management and allocation are reviewed by the Board of Directors.
page 73
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
21 reserVes and retained earnings
(a) nature and purpose of reserves
(i) Property, plant and equipment revaluation reserve
The revaluation reserve arises on the revaluation of land, buildings, plant and equipment. Where a revalued asset is sold, that
portion of the reserve which relates to that asset, and is effectively realised, is recognised in retained earnings.
(ii) Hedging reserve ‑ cash flow hedges
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cashflow hedging
instruments relating to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.
(iii) Dividends
No dividends were declared by the Company or the Group during the year.
22 reconciliation of profit after income taX to net cash inflow from
operating actiVities
Profit for the year
Non-cash and non operating items:
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets
Interest costs classified as financing cash flow
Interest received classified as investing cash flow
Deferred tax
Movements in working capital:
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
11,528
10,182
13,525
(1,272)
4,496
2012
$’000
4,384
8,639
10,626
(1,461)
(145)
2013
$’000
11,528
10,182
13,525
(1,272)
4,496
2012
$’000
4,384
8,639
10,626
(1,461)
(145)
(Increase) / decrease in trade and other receivables
(38,586)
21,316
(39,634)
21,316
(Increase) / decrease in trade finance facility
(Increase) / decrease in prepayments
(Increase) / decrease in inventories
(Increase) / decrease in other current assets
(Decrease) / increase in trade and other payables
Net cash inflow from operating activities
33,307
(411)
111
349
33,307
(411)
111
349
(34,279)
(18,305)
(34,279)
(18,305)
806
(13,084)
(13,788)
1,012
3,293
29,820
806
(13,198)
(14,950)
1,012
3,293
29,820
The difference between the Group and the Parent movements in trade and other payables relates primarily to the intercompany
balance between Synlait Milk Limited and Synlait Milk Finance Limited.
Mitsui & Co NZ is Synlait Milk Limited’s export sales agent. Under this arrangement Mitsui pays Synlait Milk the amounts invoiced
to export customers within an agreed period after shipment of products. The amounts received from Mitsui are included within
receipts from customers.
page 74 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
23 financial risk management
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk
and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks
to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. The Group uses derivative financial instruments to
hedge certain risk exposures.
(a) market risk
(i) Foreign exchange risk
The Group enters into derivative arrangements in the ordinary course of business to manage foreign currency risk. The Board
coordinates risk policies on a regular basis.
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on it’s sales, which are predominantly denominated in US dollars. The Group is also
exposed to foreign currency risk on the purchase of capital equipment from overseas. The Group has a Board approved treasury
policy that sets the parameters under which foreign exchange cover is to be taken.
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows:
Trade receivables, being Statement of Financial
Position exposure before hedging activities
31 July 2013
31 July 2012
USD
$’000
37,803
Euro
$’000
3
USD
$’000
15,606
Euro
$’000
-
The Group holds derivative contracts with notional balances of $159m (31 July 2012: $126m) in respect of future sale transactions.
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency in the period ended 31 July 2013 is limited to it’s sales of milk powder, purchases of raw
materials for production and capital equipment purchases.
(ii) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of the Group’s assets and liabilities will fluctuate due to changes in market interest
rates. The Group is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its bank overdrafts and borrowings.
The Group manages it’s interest rate risk by using interest rate swaps to hedge it’s floating rate debt.
The Group has a Board approved treasury policy that sets the parameters to the extent of the cover taken.
As at the reporting date, the Group had the following variable rate borrowings and interest rate swap contracts outstanding:
Less than 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
31 July 2013
31 July 2012
Weighted
average
interest
rate
%
4.32%
5.23%
4.89%
4.04%
-
Balance
$’000
105,129
57,527
39,000
20,000
-
Weighted
average
interest
rate
%
4.81%
4.32%
5.23%
4.89%
4.04%
Balance
$’000
93,000
105,129
57,527
39,000
20,000
The above balances include forward start swap contracts for various periods and do not reflect the current active contracts held
at any one point in time.
page 75
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(iii)Sensitivity analysis
In managing interest rate risks, the Group aims to reduce the impact of short-term fluctuations on the Group’s earnings. Over the
longer-term, however, changes in interest rates will have an impact on profit.
The following table summarises the sensitivity of the Group’s profit and equity to interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.
Consolidated
31 July 2013
1% increase in interest rate
1% decrease in interest rate
Group
Parent
2013
2012
2013
2012
Profit
$’000
-
-
Equity
$’000
(473)
473
Profit
$’000
-
-
Equity
$’000
(1,070)
1,070
Profit
$’000
Equity
$’000
Profit
$’000
Equity
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5% increase in exchange rate
19
(4,627)
1,239
(3,305)
19
(4,627)
1,239
(3,305)
5% decrease in exchange rate
(18)
4,187
(1,121)
2,990
(18)
4,187
(1,121)
2,990
(b)credit risk
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is mainly influenced by its customer base and banking counterparties. Management has a
credit policy in place under which each new customer is rigorously analysed for credit worthiness. Investments and derivatives are
only made with reputable financial banks.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the Group’s maximum credit exposure. Synlait Milk Limited guarantees all
facilities held by Synlait Milk Finance Limited.
(c)liquidity risk
Liquidity risk represents the Group’s ability to meet its contractual obligations. The Group evaluates its liquidity requirements on
an ongoing basis. The Group has negotiated banking facilities sufficient to meet it’s medium term facility requirements.
The Group has internal limits in place in order to reduce exposure to liquidity risk, as well as having committed lines of credit. It is
the Group’s policy to provide credit and liquidity enhancements only to wholly owned subsidiaries.
Less than
12 months
Between 1
and 2 years
Between 2
and 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
33,605
57,536
47,697
2,054
4,379
145,271
5,141
70,619
13,997
25,258
2,582
117,597
357
-
-
2,836
440
3,633
-
-
-
70,768
1,037
71,805
-
-
-
29,686
-
29,686
-
-
-
-
697
697
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,962
57,536
47,697
34,576
4,819
178,590
5,141
70,619
13,997
96,026
4,316
190,099
Group
At 31 July 2013
Working Capital Facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total
At 31 July 2012
Working Capital Facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total
page 76 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Parent
At 31 July 2013
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Advances from subsidiary
Derivative financial instruments
Total
At 31 July 2012
Working Capital Facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total
(d)financial instruments by category
Less than 12
months
Between 1
and 2 years
Between 2
and 5 years Over 5 years
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
57,421
47,697
66,506
2,980
174,604
5,141
70,619
13,997
26,473
2,582
118,812
-
-
3,193
-
3,193
-
-
-
73,825
1,037
74,862
-
-
29,124
-
29,124
-
-
-
-
697
697
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Group
Financial assets as per financial
position
At 31 July 2013
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Total
At 31 July 2012
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Total
Assets at
fair value
through
profit or
loss
Derivatives
used for
hedging
Loans and
receivables
Held to
maturity
investments
Available
for sale
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
1,224
-
1,224
-
4,109
-
4,109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,365
-
59,134
61,499
666
-
20,884
21,550
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
$’000
57,421
47,697
98,823
2,980
206,921
5,141
70,619
13,997
100,298
4,316
194,371
Total
$’000
2,365
1,224
59,134
62,723
666
4,109
20,884
25,659
page 77
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Parent
Financial assets as per financial
position
At 31 July 2013
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Total
At 31 July 2012
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Total
Group
Derivatives
used for
hedging
Assets at fair
value through
profit or loss
Loans and
receivables
Held to
maturity
investments
Available for
sale
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
1,138
-
1,138
-
4,109
-
4,109
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31,486
-
59,134
90,620
666
-
20,884
21,550
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Derivatives
used for
hedging
Liabilities
at fair value
through
profit or loss
At
amortised
cost
$’000
$’000
$’000
Financial liabilities as per financial position
At 31 July 2013
Derivative financial instruments
Working Capital Facility
Trade Finance Facility
Trade and other payables
Loans and borrowings
Total
At 31 July 2012
Derivative financial instruments
Working Capital Facility
Trade Finance Facility
Trade and other payables
Loans and borrowings
Total
4,819
-
-
-
-
4,819
4,316
-
-
-
-
4,316
page 78 i
Total
$’000
31,486
1,138
59,134
91,758
666
4,109
20,884
25,659
Total
$’000
4,819
33,079
46,924
57,535
27,917
4,316
2,344
13,617
70,620
91,768
-
33,079
46,924
-
-
-
-
57,535
57,535
170,274
27,917
107,920
-
2,344
13,617
91,768
107,729
-
-
-
-
-
-
70,620
70,620
182,665
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Parent
At 31 July 2013
Derivative financial instruments
Trade Finance Facility
Trade and other payables
Advances from subsidiary
Total
At 31 July 2012
Derivative financial instruments
Working Capital Facility
Trade Finance Facility
Trade and other payables
Loans and borrowings
Total
Derivatives
used for
hedging
$’000
Liabilities
at fair value
through
profit or loss
$’000
At amortised
cost
$’000
2,980
-
-
-
-
46,924
-
-
-
-
57,421
91,281
Total
$’000
2,980
46,924
57,421
91,281
2,980
46,924
148,702
198,606
4,316
-
-
-
-
4,316
-
2,344
13,617
-
-
-
-
70,620
4,316
2,344
13,617
70,620
91,768
91,768
107,729
-
70,620
182,665
(e) fair value estimation
The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels have been defined as
follows:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1).
Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices)
or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (Level 2).
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (Level 3).
The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at 31 July 2013.
Group
At 31 July 2013
Assets
Derivative financial instruments
Total assets
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total liabilities
At 31 July 2012
Assets
Derivative financial instruments
Total assets
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total liabilities
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3 Total balance
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,224
1,224
4,819
4,819
4,109
4,109
4,316
4,316
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,224
1,224
4,819
4,819
4,109
4,109
4,316
4,316
page 79
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 I
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Parent
At 31 July 2013
Assets
Derivative financial instruments
Total assets
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total liabilities
At 31 July 2012
Assets
Derivative financial instruments
Total assets
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total liabilities
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3 Total balance
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,138
1,138
2,980
2,980
4,109
4,109
4,316
4,316
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,138
1,138
2,980
2,980
4,109
4,109
4,316
4,316
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance date. A market
is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing
service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length
basis. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. These instruments are included
in Level 1.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is
determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is
available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are
observable, the instrument is included in Level 2.
If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:
Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments;
The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield
curves;
The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange rates at the balance date, with the
resulting value discounted back to present value;
Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.
Note that all of the resulting fair value estimates are included in Level 2.
page 80 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
24 deriVatiVes
Derivative balances comprise of:
Foreign currency forward contracts
Interest rate swaps
Balance at end of period
Classified as:
Non current asset
Current asset
Non current liabilities
Current liabilities
Balance at end of period
25 contingencies
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
(1,841)
(1,754)
(3,595)
86
1,138
(440)
(4,379)
(3,595)
2012
$’000
3,756
(3,963)
(207)
-
4,109
(1,734)
(2,582)
(207)
2013
$’000
(1,842)
-
(1,842)
-
1,138
-
(2,980)
(1,842)
2012
$’000
3,756
(3,963)
(207)
-
4,109
(1,734)
(2,582)
(207)
As at 31 July 2013 the Parent entity and Group had no contingent liabilities or assets (2012:$Nil).
26 commitments
(a) capital commitments
Capital expenditure contracted for at the end of the reporting period but not yet incurred is as follows:
Lactoferrin project
Blending plant
Canning line
Drystore 3
Total
Group
Parent
2013
$’000
9,790
4,947
10,428
13,557
38,722
2012
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
2013
$’000
9,790
4,947
10,428
13,557
38,722
2012
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
The above balances have been committed for completion in the 2014 financial year in relation to future expenditure on capital
projects. Amounts already spent have been included as work in progress
(i)Operating lease commitments – group/company as lessee
Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:
Less than one year
Between one and five years
Greater than five years
Total
Group
2013
$’000
578
144
-
722
2012
$’000
840
-
-
840
Parent
2013
$’000
578
144
-
722
2012
$’000
840
-
-
840
The operating leases relate to the leasing of warehouse space, vehicles and printers. All terms are reviewed on a regular basis. All
leases are subject to potential renewal.
page 81
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 I
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
27 related party transactions
(a) parent entity
The parent entity is Bright Dairy Holding Limited and the ultimate parent is Bright Dairy and Food Limited which is domiciled in
the Peoples Republic of China. Bright Dairy Holding Limited hold 39.12% of the shares issued by the Company (2012: 51%)
(b) other related entities
Synlait Farms Limited was a wholly owned subsidiary of Synlait Limited who supplied milk on an arms length basis to Synlait Milk
Limited. As of 28 February 2013 Synlait Farms Limited is no longer a subsidiary of Synlait Limited.
In June 2013 a subsidiary of Synlait Milk Limited, Synlait Milk Finance Limited, was set up primarily for holding all banking
facilities for the Group and related interest rate swaps. Funding is loaned to Synlait Milk Limited and appropriate interest is
charged.
(c) key management and personnel compensation
Other than their salaries and bonus incentives, there are no other cash benefits paid or due to directors and executive officers as at
31 July 2013. The total short-term benefits paid to the key management and personnel is set out below.
Short-term benefits
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2,848
960
d) other transactions with key management personnel or entities related to them
Information on transactions with key management personnel or entities related to them, other than compensation, are set out
below.
(i) Loans to directors
There were no loans to directors issued during the period ended 31 July 2013 (2012: $nil).
(ii) Other transactions and balances
Key management personnel subscribed in cash for new ordinary shares issued by the Company and Group during the year. The
shares were acquired on the same terms and conditions that applied to other shareholders.
Directors of the Company control 3.8% of the voting shares of the Company at balance date (2012: 13.3% indirectly through their
shareholdings in Synlait Limited)
(e) subsidiaries
Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 27.
(f) directors and key management personnel
Disclosures relating to directors and specified executives are set out in the Statutory Information section.
page 82 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
(g) transactions with related parties
Purchase of goods and services
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Directors fees
Synlait Farms Limited - Purchase of raw milk
Sale of goods and services
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Sale of milk powder products
8,470
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Reimbursement of costs
Synlait Farms Limited - Management fees received
Finance costs
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
87
33
-
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
183
42,420
2012
$’000
165
32,804
4,604
181
113
2013
$’000
183
42,420
8,470
87
33
2012
$’000
165
32,804
4,604
181
113
-
114
-
Note that as at 28 February 2013 Synlait Farms Limited ceased to be a related party due to divestment from Synlait Limited.
(h) outstanding balances
The following balances are outstanding at the reporting date in relation to transactions with related parties:
Receivables
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Sale of milk powder products
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Reimbursement of costs
Synlait Farms Limited - Management fees received
Payables
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Directors fees
Synlait Farms Limited - purchase of raw milk
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Group
Year ended
2013
$’000
325
58
-
-
4,439
-
2012
$’000
481
(39)
8
14
6,817
-
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
325
58
-
-
4,439
91,281
2012
$’000
481
(39)
8
14
6,817
-
page 83
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 I
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
28 inVestments in subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in accordance with
the accounting policy described in note 2(a):
Name of entity
Country of
incorporation
Class of
shares
Equity holding
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
New Zealand
Ordinary
2013
%
100
2012
%
-
In June 2013 a subsidiary, Synlait Milk Finance Limited, was set up primarily for holding all banking facilities for the Group and
related interest rate swaps. Funding is loaned to Synlait Milk Limited and appropriate interest is charged.
29 comparison of prospectiVe financial information
Prospective Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ending 31 July 2013
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross Profit
Other income
Sales and distribution expenses
Administrative and operating expenses
Earnings before net finance expense and income tax1
Add back depreciation and amortisation expense1
Earnings before net finance expese, income tax,
depreciation and amortisation1
Net financing costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2013
2013
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
a
b
c
d
e
$’000
420,010
(354,862)
65,148
1,587
(23,478)
(14,978)
28,279
10,182
38,461
$’000
426,426
(361,827)
64,599
195
(23,079)
(14,230)
27,485
9,963
37,448
(12,253)
(12,431)
16,026
(4,498)
11,528
15,054
(4,215)
10,839
$’000
(6,416)
6,965
549
1,392
(399)
(748)
794
219
1,013
178
972
(283)
689
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
(3,387)
(2,350)
(1,037)
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
(337)
1,043
8,847
643
743
9,875
(980)
300
(1,028)
1 The above Non GAAP financial information was included in the prospectus and therefore has been included in these financial statements for
comparative purposes.
page 84 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013
nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Explanation of variances
(a) Revenue for the year was lower than PFI by $6.4m, primarily due to a reduction in Infant Formula and Nutritional volumes sold.
Demand for Infant formula products were affected in the last quarter of the financial year primarily due to proposed regulatory
changes announced in China causing product order and delivery delays as customers absorbed the impact of these changes.
(b) Gross profit was up $0.5m compared to PFI due primarily to higher prices achieved on ingredients products and higher margins
achieved on nutritional products.
(c) Earthquake insurance proceeds received of $1.3m are included in Other Income, while the associated earthquake repair costs of
$0.6 are included in manufacturing costs.
(d) Sales and distribution expenses are higher than PFI due to additional warehouse rent.
(e) Administration and operating expenses are above PFI due to higher than anticipated travel costs, computer expenses, and
internal costs that were unable to be capitalised.
Prospective Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ending 31 July 2013
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2013
2013
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
Equity at the start of the period
Accounting policy change to monthly milk price
Restated Equity at the start of the period
Profit for the year
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to
profit and loss
Income tax on income and expenses recognised directly in equity
f
f
Total other comprehensive loss
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Total contributions by and distributions to owners
Equity at the end of the period
$’000
88,244
(1,953)
86,291
11,528
$’000
88,244
(1,953)
86,291
10,839
$’000
-
-
-
689
(3,387)
(2,350)
(1,037)
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
643
743
(964)
75,000
(6,175)
68,825
(980)
300
(1,717)
-
75
75
164,038
164,991
(953)
Explanation of variances
(f) Movement in reserves due to the mark to market value of derivatives being higher than PFI.
page 85
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Prospective Financial Position
As at 31 July 2013
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Goods and services tax refundable
Income accruals and prepayments
Inventories
Derivative financial instruments
Total current assets
Non‑current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Working Capital Facility
Trade and other payables
Trade Finance Facility
Derivative financial instruments
Total current liabilities
Non‑current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity
Share Capital
Reserves
Retained (deficit) / earnings
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Company
Total equity and liabilities
page 86 i
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2013
2013
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
$’000
$’000
$’000
j
g
h
m
i
k
m
j
l
m
n
m
m
2,365
59,134
2,917
570
65,025
1,138
-
68,876
2,771
784
58,847
-
131,149
131,278
210,780
217,954
4,052
86
214,918
346,067
33,079
57,535
46,924
4,379
230
-
218,184
349,462
39,755
60,959
48,478
1,104
141,917
150,296
27,917
11,755
440
40,112
182,029
172,548
6,175
(14,685)
164,038
346,067
20,950
11,772
1,453
34,175
184,471
172,473
7,892
(15,374)
164,991
349,462
2,365
(9,742)
146
(214)
6,178
1,138
(129)
(7,174)
3,822
86
(3,266)
(3,395)
(6,676)
(3,424)
(1,554)
3,275
(8,379)
6,967
(17)
(1,013)
5,937
(2,442)
75
(1,717)
689
(953)
(3,395)
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013nOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Explanation of variances
(g) Accounts receivable were $9.7m lower than PFI due to a strong focus on cash collections.
(h) Inventories were $6.2m higher than PFI due to higher Infant protein raw material on hand and higher Infant and special milk
stock on hand.
(i) Property, plant and equipment was $7.2m lower than the PFI predominantly due to there being lower payments than expected
associated with capital projects.
(j) Net working capital facility is below the PFI, primarily due to management deciding to defer making a voluntary repayment of
$10m to the Revolving Credit Facility (Loans and Borrowings).
(k) Intangibles are $3.8 m higher due to computer software assets having been disclosed in Property, Plant and Equipment in the PFI.
(l) Trade and other payables are $3.4m lower than the PFI due to timing of ingredients purchases and payments assumed in the PFI.
(m) Derivative financial instruments are a net $1.0m higher than PFI, spread over assets and liabilities. This is primarily due to the
foreign exchange ‘out of the money position’ with cover on hand at year end at rates higher than the spot rates. The mark to market
movement being reflected in reserves.
(n) Loans and borrowings are $7.0m higher than PFI due to the deferment in making a $10.0 m voluntary repayment before the
balance date, offset by the slower than expected capital project payments assumed in the PFI.
page 87
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 InOTEs TO THE FInAnCIAL sTATEMEnTs
FOR THE yEAR EnDIng 31 JULy 2013
Prospective Cash Flow Statement
For the year ending 31 July 2013
Notes
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers
Cash paid for milk purchased
Cash paid to other creditors and employees
Goods and services tax refunds
Income tax refunds
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of intangibles
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds and costs from issue of shares
Repayment of borrowings
Receipt of borrowings
Interest paid
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Net overdraft at beginning of period
Net overdraft at end of period1
o
p
q
r
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2013
2013
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
$’000
$’000
$’000
415,907
(289,268)
(141,231)
575
229
413,382
(288,586)
(134,010)
723
228
2,525
(682)
(7,221)
(148)
1
(13,788)
(8,263)
(5,525)
1,272
(7,989)
(55)
(6,772)
68,900
(64,521)
670
(13,525)
(8,476)
(29,036)
(1,678)
(30,714)
62
(15,237)
-
(15,175)
69,568
(81,120)
9,840
(12,927)
(14,639)
(38,077)
(1,678)
(39,755)
1,210
7,248
(55)
8,403
(668)
16,599
(9,170)
598
7,359
10,237
-
10,237
1Net working capital facility is used in the comparison to PFI Statement of Cash Flows for comparability purposes as this is how it was treated in the Prospectus.
In the financial statements cash and cash equivalent is used and this will be the treatment going forward.
Explanation of variances
(o) Sales receipts are $2.5m higher than PFI due to higher cash collections from customers at the end of July offset by the lower
sales volumes.
(p) Cash paid to creditors are $7.2m higher than the PFI, due to payments for raw materials and other creditors occurring before
year end.
(q) Cash purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment are $7.2m lower than PFI as payments for capital projects have been slower
than expected.
(r) Net borrowings is $7.4m less than the PFI, due to the deferment of a $10m voluntary repayment assumed in the PFI, offset by
lower drawdowns relating to lower spend on capital projects to July 2013.
30 eVents occurring after the reporting period
There were no events occurring subsequent to balance date which require adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.
page 88 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 ISynlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013AUDITOR’s REpORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF SYNLAIT MILK LIMITED
report on the financial statements
We have audited the financial statements of Synlait Milk Limited and group on pages 49 to 88, which comprise the consolidated
and separate statements of financial position of Synlait Milk Limited, as at 31 July 2013, the consolidated and separate statements
of comprehensive income, statements of changes in equity and statements of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary
of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
This report is made solely to the Company’s shareholders, as a body, in accordance with Section 205(1) of the Companies Act
1993. Our audit has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s shareholders those matters we are required to
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the Company’s shareholders as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions
we have formed.
board of directors’ responsibility for the financial statements
The Board of Directors are responsible for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting practice in New Zealand and that give a true and fair view of the matters to which they relate, and for such internal
control as the Board of Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
auditor’s responsibilities
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in
accordance with International Standards on Auditing and International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards
require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of
the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control
relevant to the entity’s preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view of the matters to which they relate in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies
used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates, as well as the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Other than in our capacity as auditor, investigating accountant and auditor in respect of the 24 June 2013 IPO, the provision of
financial model assurance services, taxation consulting services and other advisory services we have no relationship with or
interests in Synlait Milk Limited or its subsidiary.
page 89
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 IAUDITOR’s REpORT COnT...
opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements on pages 49 to 88:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;
- comply with International Financial Reporting Standards; and
- give a true and fair view of the financial position of Synlait Milk Limited and group as at 31 July 2013, and their financial
performance and cash flows for the year then ended.
report on other legal and regulatory reQuirements
We also report in accordance with section 16 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993. In relation to our audit of the financial
statements for the year ended 31 July 2013:
- we have obtained all the information and explanations we have required; and
-
in our opinion proper accounting records have been kept by Synlait Milk Limited as far as appears from our examination of
those records.
Chartered Accountants
23 September 2013
Christchurch, New Zealand
WE’RE
COMMITTED
TO A HIgH
pERFORMAnCE
WORKIng
EnVIROnMEnT
page 90 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 i
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013cOMPanY discLOsuRes
WE’RE
COMMITTED
TO A HIgH
pERFORMAnCE
WORKIng
EnVIROnMEnT
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2013 i
page 91
sTATUTORy InFORMATIOn
stock eXchange listing
Our shares are listed on the Main Board of the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX).
shares on issue
As at 31 July 2013 we had 146,341,197 ordinary shares issued to 2,412 holders.
top 20 shareholders
Our top 20 shareholders as at 31 July 2013 are as follows:
Rank Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Bright Dairy Holding Limited
FNZ Custodians Limited
Mitsui & Co.Limited
Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited - NZCSD
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above