More annual reports from Synlait Milk Limited:
2023 ReportBUILDING
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
BLENDING & CONSUMER PACKAGING
MO. ..
Our state-of-the-art blending and consumer packaging facility has world
class operating efficiency and quality standards. Our customers now have
a complete product supply solution with total integrity, from raw milk
sourcing through to retail packaging.
COMPLETED JULY 2014.
LACTOFERRIN EXTRACTION & PURIFICATION FACILITY
MOMEN. ..
We’re one of only two manufacturers world-wide with the capability to
produce lactoferrin as a spray-dried powder. Our process is designed to
protect its bio-activity and increase its solubility, something our infant
formula, health food and pharmaceutical customers demand.
COMPLETED APRIL 2014.
MOMENTUM
22,500M2 DRYSTORE
Our new 22,500m2 drystore enables all inwards goods and finished
product to be stored at our Dunsandel site. Now with product manufacture,
packaging, and containerisation for export all on one site our customers can
have complete confidence in the integrity of their product.
COMPLETED APRIL 2014.
CONTENTS
Trend Statement
Pg 2
Our Partnerships
Pg 14
Our Place
Pg 18
Chairman’s Report
Pg 4
Managing Director’s Report Pg 8
Sponsoring A Splashing
Goodtime
akaraTM Inspired By Akaroa
Advancing Nutrition With
Mead Johnson
The Platinum Standard
In Infant Formula
Supplier Conference 2014:
Destination
Shanghai Presence
Leading With Pride™
Recognition For Environmentally
Minded Supplier
Sustainable Dairying Accord
Responsible Dairy Processing
22,500m2 Of Additional Storage
Dedication To A Single Site
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Our Process
Pg 22
Our People
Pg 26
Our Future
The Formula Of Our Blending And
Consumer Packaging Facility
Creating A Leadership Culture
Synlait 101
Our Remuneration
Our Governance
Pg 29
Pg 32
Pg 34
Pg 38
Lactoferrin Extraction And
Purification Facility
Quality Under The Microscope
Everyone Home Safe Every Day
Our Board Of Directors
Great People
Our Senior Leadership Team Pg 40
Our Financial Review
Pg 42
Our Financial Statements
Pg 46
Auditors Report
Statutory Disclosures
Directory
Pg 94
Pg 96
Pg 106
I PAGE 1
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TREND STATEMENT
Gross Profit per Metric Tonne (MT)
(NZD)
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation
and Amortisation (In millions NZD)
824
751
FY2014
FY2013
Return on Capital Employed
11.5%
13.1%
50
40
30
20
10
0
15
12
9
6
3
0
43.8
38.5
FY2014
FY2013
Earnings per Share
(Cents)
13.40
10.21
FY2014
FY2013
FY2014
FY2013
10
8
6
4
2
0
15
12
9
6
3
0
PAGE 2 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Trend Statement
Currency as stated (in millions)
FY2014
FY2014
FY2013
FY2012
FY2011
FY2010
Actual
PFI*
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Financial performance
Revenue
Gross profit
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortisation (EBITDA)
Earnings before net finance costs and
income tax (EBIT)
Net profit after tax (NPAT)
Revenue (USD per MT)
Earnings per share (EPS)
Gross profit per MT (NZD)
EBIT per MT sold (NZD)
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities1
Balance sheet
Total assets
Capital employed
600.5
524.4
420.0
376.8
298.9
233.4
77.1
43.8
76.4
44.0
65.1
38.5
46.0
22.1
21.1
4.8
23.7
10.2
32.4
32.1
28.3
13.4
-
5.3
19.6
5,214
13.40
824
349
58.7
476.9
335.2
19.7
4,438
13.44
832
349
98.3
380.4
272.4
11.5
3,894
10.21
751
326
(47.1)
346.1
231.0
4.4
3,644
5.62
594
174
29.7
277.3
195.3
7.3%
0.78
6.14
(3.1)
3,848
(3.21)
385
(10)
9.2
245.3
170.8
0.0%
0.73
7.66
(11.7)
2,882
(21.21)
462
124
13.8
151.0
102.4
5.0%
0.64
6.21
Net return on capital employed (pre-tax)
11.5%
12.6%
13.1%
Foreign exchange rate (NZD:USD)
Synlait contracted milk price (kgMS)2
0.81
8.27
0.81
5.80
0.80
5.81
Key Operational Metrics
FY2014
FY2014
FY2013
FY2012
FY2011
FY2010
Sales
Ingredients
87,248
80,435
81,085
73,003
54,648
51,271
Infant formula and nutritionals
6,396
11,465
5,661
4,412
238
-
Total sales (MT)
Production
Ingredients
Infant formula and nutritionals
Total production (MT)
Milk purchases
93,644
91,900
86,746
77,415
54,886
51,271
89,276
79,262
7,216
11,684
96,492
90,946
81,148
10,081
91,229
76,661
53,807
49,729
4,737
608
294
81,398
54,415
50,023
Milk purchased from contracted supply
47,903
46,400
42,076
37,572
24,934
21,865
Milk purchased from Fonterra and other suppliers
2,033
-
4,692
6,453
4,524
4,525
Total milk purchases (kgMS in thousands)
49,936
46,400
46,768
44,025
29,458
26,390
* Prospective financial information.
1 Net movements in the trade finance facility is now classified as a financing cashflow as opposed to operating cashflow. All comparative and forecast information
has been regrouped accordingly.
2 Base milk price for Synlait Milk suppliers on standard milk supply contract, excludes premiums paid.
I PAGE 3
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
Graeme Milne
CHAIRMAN
PAGE 4 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
Continued growth underscores our sixth year of operation.
Our drystore expansion was completed on time in April 2014
Exporting over 90,000 metric tonnes (MT) of added value dairy
at a cost of $17.0 million, our new lactoferrin extraction and
ingredients and nutritional powders has lifted our revenue to
purification facility was completed in April 2014 at a cost of
more than $600 million.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
$21.9 million (the first product sales having already occurred)
and our blending and consumer packaging facility was
completed on time in July 2014 at a cost of $29.2 million.
Our focus during FY2014 has been to deliver on the promises
As we enter FY2015, work is well underway with other growth
we made to shareholders in our investment statement and
initiatives. Construction has begun on our new administration
prospectus on 24 June 2013. Financially, we have delivered.
building and quality testing laboratory, estimated to cost $21.0
Revenue, at $601 million, is well above the prospective
million. Our next large scale infant formula capable spray
financial information (PFI) target of $524 million. Buoyant
dryer, dryer three (D3), is also underway with an estimated
world market prices through the majority of the reporting
total capital cost of $135.0 million and a completion date of
period were a large contributor to our revenue. Profitability
September 2015. Our butter manufacturing plant is currently
was on target with our PFI, with gross profit being $77 million
being designed with a view to build in FY2016. These projects
and earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) at $32 million.
will equip us well for significant future growth in both scale
Net profit after tax (NPAT) was slightly under the PFI target
and profitability.
of $19.7 million at $19.6 million, however this is well up on
FY2013’s $11.5 million profit.
INTERNATIONAL MARKET CONDITIONS
Our result was achieved with a number of positives and
Our vision is focused on becoming a trusted supplier of
negatives to the original plan. Positively, world market prices
choice to the world’s leading milk-based health and nutrition
for our major products stayed firm for the first seven months
companies. Our business is strongly influenced by the global
of FY2014 and firmer than other dairy based products,
dairy commodity market, both in terms of market prices and
such as cheese and casein, which we do not manufacture.
consequently farm gate milk prices.
This advantage, however, was largely eliminated by two
countervailing factors.
In our FY2013 Annual Report we predicted high milk powder
prices, in excess of USD $5,000 per MT, could not last due to
The first was the very same high-priced market. In these
consumer resistance and production increases in the United
circumstances, it becomes very difficult to achieve targeted
States of America and the European Union. All this has come
premiums and gross margin for specialised ingredients.
to pass with a major reduction in commodity prices, starting
Market uncertainties in China meant our key infant formula
in March 2014 and continuing through to the close of FY2014.
market was the second major factor. While regulations
changed and requirements were clarified, key customers were
forced to delay and in some cases cancel orders, which also
lead to significant stock write downs, reducing production
volumes below target for the year. Despite this, the sales of
infant and nutritional products were 13% up on the previous
year from 5,661 MT in FY2013 to 6,396 MT in FY2014.
GROWTH INITIATIVES
The second major target in our investment statement and
prospectus was to establish the next phase of the company’s
development, both in market and physically at our site in
Dunsandel. The growth initiatives are proceeding well with
three projects now completed.
Milk powder prices have fallen from USD$5,000 per MT to
less than USD$3,000 per MT in this short period. While the
value of the New Zealand Dollar has decreased, these prices
translate to a farm gate return of approximately $4.50 per kg
of milk solids (MS) (August 2014), down from a peak of $9.50
per kgMS (February 2014). Milk suppliers will actually receive
an annual average of these prices. For our milk suppliers, the
average total milk price in FY2014 was $8.31 per kgMS, which
was well up on FY2013’s $5.89 per kgMS.
With such volatility, it is extremely difficult to predict
international prices with any certainty. However, it is clear that
demand from developing economies will continue to increase.
I PAGE 5
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014CHAIRMAN’S REPORT CONTINUED
What is less clear is whether raw milk supply will be under
GOVERNANCE
or over demand, in a market that is currently oversupplied.
The soft period is forecast to last at least until end of the
2014 calendar year and could well be longer. While volatility
produces uncertainty, low or high prices are manageable
within our business plan and do not fundamentally undermine
profitability. We have strong risk mitigation policies and
procedures around sales and foreign exchange hedging, which
are both key to manage the volatility risk. Our value added
ingredients and nutritional products strategies provide further
resilience by not only adding margin, but also by reducing
the proportion of ingredients in final products being based
purely on milk.
MILK SUPPLY
Our total number of milk suppliers increased from 148 in
FY2013 to 161 in FY2014. Along with the increased number
of contracted farms we have reduced the average distance
from supplier farms to our Dunsandel manufacturing site to
45km, bringing cost and production efficiencies. Our Lead
With PrideTM farm quality assurance programme, launched
in FY2013, has received strong support from our milk supply
base with over a quarter of our suppliers actively working
through the programme. Our second annual milk supplier
conference was well received by our milk supply base and
customers who attended.
PEOPLE
Many talented individuals have joined the company during
the year. Staff numbers have increased from 171 in FY2013 to
238 in FY2014. Our focus on leadership development remains
central to the business. During FY2014 our first leadership
conference was held for all staff in leadership positions.
External speakers, including myself, shared skills and insights
with our team, with that knowledge now being applied
throughout our business.
Dr. John Penno, our Managing Director, continues to
skillfully lead the company during this period of considerable
growth. John has travelled extensively this year, leading the
development of key customers and markets and gaining
personal insight into the Chinese regulatory requirements.
My thanks go to John, the Senior Leadership Team and the
Our Board of Directors have been involved in market
development during FY2014, visiting key customers in
Singapore and Shanghai to gain in-depth insights into
customer and market dynamics.
I would like to thank all of our Directors. In particular, Bill
Roest as Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee and Ruth
Richardson as Chair of Remuneration and Governance
Committee, who have served the company admirably.
During FY2014 a comprehensive review of our Director’s
effectiveness was conducted by an external advisory group.
Our Board is diverse in culture, ethnicity, language, gender,
skills, experience and location. Several insights were gained
from this review on which we will be able to leverage to the
advantage of the company.
SHAREHOLDERS RETURN
Shareholders return this year was a pleasing increase of
33% from a closing share price on July 31 FY2013 of $2.61,
to a closing share price of $3.46 on July 31 FY2014. The
Directors, in line with indications in our investment statement
and prospectus, have not declared any dividends this year.
Given the continued profitable growth prospects planned,
we do not expect to declare any dividends at least for the
immediate future.
OUTLOOK
During FY2015 we will continue to invest in our growth
initiatives, particularly D3. Improvements in returns through
increased sales in the infant formula and nutritional markets
will, however, be largely balanced by increased operating and
funding costs. We are confident in our future outlook and look
forward to continuing to work for shareholders during 2015.
Graeme Milne
whole staff for their efforts during the course of FY2014.
CHAIRMAN
PAGE 6 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
I PAGE 7
MANAGING DIRECTOR’S
REPORT
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
PAGE 8 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT
MARKET DEVELOPMENT
Our vision of becoming the trusted supplier of choice to the
world’s leading milk-based health and nutrition companies is
building momentum.
In the coming year we expect that approximately half of our
milk powder business will be sold into the infant formula and
nutritional markets.
This will be in the form of finished retail-ready infant formula
marketed and distributed by our customers, infant formula
base powder that is finished and retail packed by our
customers, or as milk powder used as an ingredient in infant
formula made at our customers’ manufacturing sites.
We now produce product for four of the world’s five leading
multinational infant formula companies, together representing
52% of the global infant formula market by volume.
We are in ongoing discussions with each of them about
developing our relationship to include increased volumes, the
manufacture of higher value products as well as co-operating
on research and development opportunities.
The development of these relationships supports our
sales strategy to have 70% of our business with leading
multinational customers. This strategy will ultimately drive
increased volume, reduce the number of customers we work
with and bring production efficiencies to our business.
The strategy allows for 25% of our business to be with regional
market leaders, companies that hold leading positions in
country specific regional markets and are typically innovative
and nimble. Bright Dairy with their Pure CanterburyTM infant
formula brand and New Hope Dairy with their akaraTM infant
formula brand are examples of regional leaders in China.
The remaining 5% of our business is targeted at companies
that have a unique position in the market with growth
potential and high value, such as The a2 Milk Company with
their a2 Platinum® infant formula.
Our core business strategy remains firmly business to business.
This enables us to scale quickly and isolates us from the risk
of investing in brand development. Importantly, it assures our
customers that we are not going to compete with them.
During FY2014 our new lactoferrin extraction and purification
facility became commercially operational. We are now one
of only two manufacturers world-wide with the capability to
produce lactoferrin as a spray-dried powder, through a process
designed to protect its bio-activity and increase solubility.
We have learnt our lactoferrin is well suited to pharmaceutical
applications and as a result some of our largest customers
have become pharmaceutical companies. This opens up some
interesting new relationships for this business.
$
Breakdown of Sales Strategy
70%
25%
5%
Multinationals
Regional Market Leaders
Unique Positioned Companies
I PAGE 9
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
CHINA REGULATIONS
While the ongoing development of the business was pleasing
during FY2014, it occurred in the face of significant volatility,
not only in international dairy prices but also in the regulatory
regime changes for the importation of dairy products,
particularly infant formula in China.
China remains the focus for most global infant formula
Peoples Republic of China (CNCA) to be registered as a dairy
and infant formula manufacturer in February 2014. In March
we were invited, along with a small number of New Zealand
companies, to present to the CNCA in Beijing. In April we
were inspected by a CNCA-led audit team from China, to
become an exporter of general dairy products and infant
formula base powders. We passed the audit and on 1 May
2014 our factory was registered to export these products
companies due to the nation’s growth, increased urbanisation,
to China.
higher disposable incomes and relaxation of the ‘one child’
policy.
In our FY2013 financial report and FY2014 half year report, we
focused on the significant regulatory changes for the infant
formula industry that were occurring in China. We continue
to support these changes that seek to increase the quality
and safety of infant formula products available to Chinese
consumers. This will ensure that only companies capable of
attaining and assuring world leading quality standards are
able to sell their brands in the Chinese market.
Part of the new regulatory regime is to register all factories
manufacturing infant formula products for the Chinese market,
and to register any brands imported into China against a
registered factory. There is also a stated policy intent to ensure
that there is a close association between the brands and
factories such that it is clear that the manufacturing company
is prepared to stand behind the quality of the branded product
in the market.
Under these regulations we made an
application to the Certification and
Accreditation Administration of the
The only exception is for exports of finished infant formula
to China. Documentation required to support our application
for registration as an exporter of retail-ready infant formula to
China was sent to the Chinese regulatory body on 28 August
2014 by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI). This
followed the approval of our Risk Management Programme
by MPI for our blending and consumer packaging plant.
The brands we applied for registration against our factory
included Pure CanterburyTM, akaraTM and a2 Platinum®.
These regulation changes were well signalled in our initial
public offering (IPO) prospectus and investment statement
released 24 June 2013. The development of our Dunsandel
site to include long term contracts for raw milk supply, batch
liquid blending and spray drying, powder blending and
consumer packaging all on one site with a full label claim
laboratory was designed to meet the prescribed model for
Chinese infant formula manufacturers. It is not a coincidence
that it is also the preferred configuration for
multinational infant formula companies, as
this provides end-to-end manufacturing
integrity.
PAGE 10 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
In fact, we are pleased to announce we have entered into a
Our blending and consumer packaging line was completed
conditional agreement, subject to certain approvals, for a 25%
on time and commissioned in July. Customer feedback has
shareholding in Sichuan New Hope Nutritional Foods Co.,
confirmed that this is a world class line in terms of operating
Ltd., the company responsible for the ownership, sale and
efficiency and product quality standards. With a processing
distribution of the akaraTM branded infant formula range in
capability of 30,000 MT per annum it is a large capacity
China. Through a small investment, the partnership will create
line, making it a cost competitive solution for large volume
an integrated supply chain for the manufacture, packaging,
customers.
supply, distribution and sale of akaraTM to consumers in China,
ensuring transparency back from can to paddock.
With our target multinational customer development
advancing faster than we had anticipated, we announced
It is pleasing to report that the disruption caused to the
mid-year that we were increasing the capacity of our second
Chinese market seems to be easing. A large number of locally
manufactured and imported brands have withdrawn from
the Chinese market during FY2014, giving rise to increased
demand for remaining brands. We are also seeing Chinese
base powder customers returning to the international market.
As a New Zealand based infant formula manufacturer, with
milk supply, spray drying and blending and packaging on
a single site, we believe we are well positioned to continue
engaging with these customers and will continue to
participate in this part of the market.
To support our growth in China we are in the process of
establishing a sales office in Shanghai. This office is a shared
facility with a small group of leading New Zealand primary
producers, and is further supported by New Zealand Trade
and Enterprise.
This recognises the importance of this market to our future,
the increasing depth of relationship required with our chosen
customers and the sophisticated product portfolio we have
chosen to specialise in.
GROWTH INITIATIVES
large scale infant formula spray drying plant (D3) from 8
MT per hour to 10 MT per hour (whole milk powder (WMP)
equivalent). Tetra Pak, who built our existing large scale
infant formula spray dryer, were awarded the build contract
to deliver operational efficiencies from the application of a
similar design to the existing plant. This plant is now under
construction with commissioning expected in September
2015, ready for the FY2016 season.
By the end of the coming year, this will give the total site
processing capacity of about 150,000 MT, including 50,000 MT
of infant formula products, 30,000 MT of finished consumer
packed infant formula, 23 MT of lactoferrin and 25,000 MT
of anhydrous milk fat (AMF). With our technical centre of
excellence in place it will make our Dunsandel site one of the
largest and most technically advanced infant formula and
nutritional manufacturing sites in the world.
MILK SUPPLY
We continue to enjoy strong support from contract milk
suppliers. In FY2014 the number of supplying farms has
grown from 148 to 161. This includes replacing 20 farms
that had been supplying milk from South Canterbury under
Under Mike Stein, General Manager of Quality and Technical
Oceania contracts. These new farms are located closer to our
Services, we are developing our quality systems to meet the
production facility making our milk collection more efficient.
standards expected by our infant formula and nutritional
All of our supplying farms are now on a standard three year
customers. Under Mike’s leadership, we made the decision
contract, with all contracts automatically extending for a
to establish an on-site ‘centre of excellence’ and increase the
further 12 months on their anniversary unless one party
scope of our proposed quality testing laboratory from chemical
indicates their intention to end the agreement on expiry (after
and physical property testing to include full microbiological
a further two seasons). This means at the start of each season
testing, as well as integrated facilities to support new product
we have milk supply security for the next three years.
development. This will be incorporated into the ground floor
of a new building that will also provide a productive and
collaborative working environment for our office-based staff.
In FY2015 we expect to contract a further 40 supplying farms.
This will provide the additional milk volume required for the
commissioning of D3 in FY2016. The strong support we have
received in FY2014 gives us confidence that we will be able to
meet this target.
I PAGE 11
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
The Lead With PrideTM on farm quality assurance programme
THANKS
is becoming a key foundation to our customer development
programme. Suppliers have responded favourably to this
Finally, I would like to acknowledge the dedication of our team.
very demanding programme recognising its value, not only
While our Company is an exciting place to be, it is
to our strategy, but also to their businesses. We now have
seldom easy to work in such a fast paced and demanding
approximately a quarter of our suppliers actively working
environment. I acknowledge all my staff for the ongoing
their way through the programme. It was pleasing to receive
effort they make, not only in doing their jobs efficiently and
approval from Environment Canterbury for Lead With PrideTM
effectively, but also continually striving to improve the way we
as a farm environment plan template, the first of its kind under
are doing things and the outcomes we are achieving.
the proposed Land & Water Regional Plan in Canterbury.
Each and every day the Senior Leadership Team continues to
The coming season is likely to be challenging for dairy
rise to the challenge of working with me to lead the business
farmers with the recent period of high prices resulting in
as it continues to grow and develop – they are great people
slowing demand from consumers, and significant increases
and I love working alongside them.
in milk production around the world. These conditions have
resulted in an oversupply of dairy and a rapid decline in dairy
commodity prices, which will directly translate into lower farm
gate milk prices.
PEOPLE
The anticipated growth in demand for our products and our
developing engagement with our customers has driven the
development of our team, our processes and our plant and
equipment.
To recruit the right people and have them develop in their
roles quickly, we have invested heavily in our human
resources team. We now have a comprehensive induction
process all new employees must complete, as well as
extensive leadership training for all people managers.
To reflect the growing scale of the business and the way our
customer relationships have developed, our Senior Leadership
Team was reorganised. The most significant change was
to move from two product category based sales teams, to a
single customer-focused sales team now led by Mike Lee,
General Manager Sales.
I would like to acknowledge the ongoing support that I receive
from our Board of Directors. I believe that shareholders, staff,
customers and suppliers are well served by a Board focused
on building a great business.
I would like to thank our suppliers for their continued support
and dedication to producing quality milk. Without their
attention and commitment to high-quality and sustainable
dairy farming practices, we would not have such a premium
core ingredient for all of our products.
I would also like to thank our shareholders for their ongoing
support and commitment. We continue to enjoy a strong
relationship with our corporate shareholders Bright Dairy and
Food Co. of Shanghai, Mitsui of Japan and FrieslandCampina
of the Netherlands, who have grown their shareholding during
the year from 7.50% to 9.99%. I acknowledge the support of
our institutional and private shareholders. We will continue to
commit to effective communication with you in order to keep
you well informed and allow you to feel connected to building
a great company as we continue to make more from milk.
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
PAGE 12 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014BUILDING
MOMENTUM
ON THE
WORLD STAGE
I PAGE 13
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PARTNERSHIPS
PAGE 14 I
Antonio Rivera, Vice President, Supply Chain Asia and Europe presents at our supplier conference.
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PARTNERSHIPS
SPONSORING A
SPLASHING GOODTIME
The opening of the Selwyn Aquatic Centre in June 2013 was
highly anticipated amongst the local Rolleston community,
who had previously been without a public pool. Developed
with their community needs in mind, the $14.7 million facility
In early 2014 New Hope Dairy launched a range of infant
formula products that have been manufactured by us.
Called akaraTM,, the infant formula is named after the French
settlement of Akaroa in Canterbury. The brand mascot is a
Hectors dolphin, which symbolises their brand’s purity and
affinity with the region.
includes an eight lane 25 metre pool, a hydrotherapy pool with
The akaraTM brand has a three tier product range in the high
spa area, a learn-to-swim pool and a leisure pool.
to mid-range price points. The product has wide distribution
A fundraising campaign was launched to fill a funding gap
throughout China.
of $1.5 million, and $10,000 was committed to the campaign
The marketing of akaraTM has utilised traditional advertising
in support of the community value the centre delivers. Many
such as television commercials, and has also engaged a highly
of our team and their families live in Rolleston and the wider
sophisticated social media campaign.
Selwyn District, and with a large number of our milk suppliers
also in the area, we’re well aware of how beneficial this facility
is to people of all ages.
Targeted at new fathers, the social media campaign has
encouraged consumers to follow the akaraTM brand via Weibo
and WeChat (China’s version of Facebook and Twitter). The
Whether it be swimming lessons, a school holiday programme
campaign has also offered a competition where by consumers
for children or an aquafitness class, the fun, safe and vibrant
share photos of themselves and their new born child in order
atmosphere at the Selwyn Aquatic Centre is something we’re
to win a trip to New Zealand to discover the home of the
proud to support in our community.
akaraTM product.
akaraTM INSPIRED
BY AKAROA
Based in Chengdu, with annual sales of around USD$8.8
billion, New Hope Group is one of the largest agribusinesses
in China with more than 400 subsidiaries and over 80,000
employees.
We have hosted over 40 consumers and media as part of this
promotion. During their time in New Zealand the competition
winners visited our headquarters where they were able to
talk with members of our Senior Leadership Team, have a tour
of our manufacturing facility and visit a supplying farm and
witness milking. In return, the competition winners shared
their experiences via social media.
New Hope Dairy is a leading subsidiary of
the New Hope Group. The division has
proven manufacturing and marketing
experience in yogurt, high-end chilled
milks, innovative milk products and
flavoured milks.
To further support the social media campaign, we
work alongside one of our milk suppliers to write
a weekly blog that is shared with their Chinese
consumers educating them on what happens
on farm to create the milk for infant formula.
Sales of akaraTM have been successful and over
the coming financial year the product will be
one of our leading infant formula customers.
I PAGE 15
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PARTNERSHIPS CONTINUED
ADVANCING NUTRITION
WITH MEAD JOHNSON
Headquartered in Glenview, Illinois, Mead Johnson is a global
leader in paediatric nutrition.
For more than a century, Mead Johnson has led the way in
developing safe, high-quality and innovative products to help
meet the nutritional needs of infants and children.
With more than 70 products in over 50 countries and more than
7,000 staff, Mead Johnson products are trusted by millions of
parents and healthcare professionals around the world.
Mead Johnson is committed to advancing the science
of paediatric nutrition around the world. To further its
efforts, the company has established the Mead Johnson
Paediatric Nutrition Institute (MJPNI). The MJPNI connects
innovative scientific technology and research with cutting-
edge manufacturing, as well as educational initiatives for
academics, healthcare professionals and consumers.
THE PLATINUM STANDARD
IN INFANT FORMULA
New Zealand-listed company The a2 Milk Company™ has a
distinct point of difference in the global dairy market.
While most cow’s milk contains both A2 and A1 beta-casein
protein, The a2 Milk Company™ markets and distributes milk
products that exclusively contain the A2 protein. It is believed
a2 Milk™ is easier on digestion. Evidence suggests this is
due to the milk being free of A1 beta casein. Interestingly this
makes milk free from A1 beta casein more like human breast
milk, which is also ‘A2’ like in terms of protein structure and
the way it digests. The company has had success in Australia
with fresh milk products. a2 Milk™ is Australia’s fastest
growing milk brand in supermarkets achieving approximately
9% value share.
In early 2012 we entered into a supply agreement with The a2
Milk Company™. This involved working with a number of our
milk suppliers who had expressed an interest in converting
We were pleased in FY2014 to start
supplying Mead Johnson with added-
value milk powder products. Securing this
contract was a major milestone for us and
marks the start of what we believe will be
a long-term partnership with the company.
A testament to the nature of our
relationship, representatives of Mead
Johnson attended and presented at our
FY2014 milk supplier conference. Our milk
suppliers greatly appreciated hearing from
Mr. Antonio Rivera, Vice President, Supply
Chain Asia and Europe at the event.
PAGE 16 I
their herds to cows that don’t produce the A1
beta casein protein. This involves a simple and
non-invasive proprietary DNA test to select
and segregate the cows to exclusively produce
milk that is naturally free of A1 beta casein.
Today 17 of our supplier farms take part in
supplying a2 MilkTM. In addition to on-farm
genetics, a2 milkTM must be collected and
processed separately from our standard milk
supply.
The milk produced by our supplier farmers and
processed by us is used to create a2Platinum®,
the only infant formula range using exclusively
the all-natural A2 protein and free from A1 beta casein protein.
Launched in 2013, the product is distributed in China,
Australia and New Zealand.
To date sales of a2 Platinum® have exceeded expectation,
particularly in the Australian market. It is forecast over the
coming financial year that a2Platinum® will be one of our
leading infant formula customers.
We continue to work collaboratively with The a2 Milk
Company™ to provide sales and marketing information for
promotional purposes and hosting media and distributor
delegations at our facility.
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PARTNERSHIPS CONTINUED
SUPPLIER CONFERENCE 2014:
DESTINATION
Fostering understanding between our raw milk suppliers
and our customers is of particular importance to us.
Creating this link allows our milk suppliers to gain a better
appreciation for the high standards our customers expect and
our customers are able to witness the level of passion
our supplier base has for producing high quality milk.
SHANGHAI PRESENCE
As our nutritional business grows in China, we’ve
partnered with other primary industry businesses in New
Zealand to establish a shared services company in China.
Once established, this company will be a wholly foreign
owned enterprise (WFOE). It will provide office facilities
and administrative support staff in central Shanghai for
representatives of members working in the dynamic
Chinese market.
The key event we have for encouraging this relationship is
our annual milk supplier conference. The conference connects
For us, this partnership is another step in building our
relationship with customers and decision makers in the
suppliers with where their milk goes. This year over 300 of
Chinese market.
our milk suppliers and rural professionals attended the day
conference and gala dinner, themed ‘Destination’, to build the
connection between our suppliers and customers.
Guests enjoyed market commentary from ANZ Chief
Economist Cameron Bagrie and DairyNZ Principal
Scientist Dr.John Roach, in addition to hearing
We think our on-ground presence will enhance our reputation
in China, ultimately building and communicating awareness
of our mission to supply the world’s best milk products and
nutritional ingredients to the world.
from representatives from some of our
customers, including Mead Johnson,
New Hope Group and Hoogwegt
Australia.
Following the day event guests
enjoyed a gala dinner that featured
cultural elements and a menu
inspired by our largest export
market, China. During the course of
the evening, guests were entertained
by All Black legend Eric Rush’s travel
stories.
Feedback from delegates and international
guests was largely positive, with many looking
forward to next year’s event.
I PAGE 17
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PLACE
PAGE 18 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PLACE
Looking after our place is important to us. We’ve implemented
several initiatives to manage our impact on the environment,
and this year our focus was to build on these and realise their
environmental benefits.
RECOGNITION FOR
ENVIRONMENTALLY
MINDED SUPPLIER
Our inaugural Supplier Environmental Award was
announced at the 2014 Supplier Conference in July 2014.
Recognising environmental leadership, the award celebrates
how agricultural production can go hand in hand with
environmental preservation.
A South Canterbury supplying farm, owned by New Zealand
Super Fund and operated by Aaron and Frances Coles, won
the award for their hand in preserving the quality of Ohapi
Creek, a freshwater stream that runs through the farm.
Fencing stock off from waterways, carrying out riparian
planting and maintaining water quality on farm led to the site
being chosen to release 7,000 young salmon for the second
year in a row.
We’re proud that this farm was chosen to
be a part of the joint conservation effort
between Fish and Game and the
McKinnons Riparian Support Trust.
LEADING WITH PRIDE
Our Lead With Pride™ programme has been well received in
its second year. More than a quarter of our milk suppliers are
currently working through the programme in a commitment
to dairy farming excellence.
The four pillars of environment, animal health and welfare,
milk quality and social responsibility set out criteria
benchmarked against best practice.
Canterbury’s regional council, Environment Canterbury,
approved Lead With Pride™ as their first farm environment
plan template in July 2014.
Dairy farmers have obligations under the
Canterbury Water Management Strategy
to manage environmental risks
effectively, and Lead With Pride™
exceeds the minimum requiremen
ts to achieve this.
“We hope the farm environment
plans that come from this
template are valuable both for
farmers and for Synlait,” said
Bill Bayfield, Chief Executive of
Environment Canterbury.
To see how Lead With PrideTM
demonstrates industry leadership and best
practice, visit synlait.com.
I PAGE 19
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PLACE CONTINUED
SUSTAINABLE DAIRYING
ACCORD
RESPONSIBLE DAIRY
PROCESSING
We are committed to the Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord
Our Dunsandel site is evolving each year as a result of growth
(SDWA), a New Zealand memorandum of understanding
initiatives. Making sure we take care of our environment is a
(MoU) amongst dairy industry regulators, associations and
focus for us, and we share the passion of our customers and
businesses to enhance the overall performance of dairy
suppliers for being a responsible dairy processor.
farming as it affects freshwater.
A review of our site stormwater system identified the
SDWA requires dairy farms to exclude dairy cattle from
opportunity to enhance infrastructure around heavily
significant waterways and wetlands, undertake riparian
trafficked areas by reconstructing our infiltration basin.
planting where benefits to water quality exist and ensure
Replacing the original basin allowed us to meet current best
crossing of dairy cattle will not result in the degradation of
practice standards, with a design that simplifies functionality
waterways.
and maintenance.
Many of our suppliers have already fulfilled SDWA
We undertook measures to refine and expand our loss
requirements through their involvement in Lead With Pride™,
monitoring system. Integrating turbidity sensors and
with 97% of waterways already mapped and systems in place
continual samplers into the plant enables us to collect more
to monitor and manage nutrients, effluent waste and
robust data and better quantify our waste streams.
water use. We will work with existing and new
suppliers to ensure they fulfil their role as
responsible dairy farmers, and we deliver
on our commitment to SDWA.
The addition of a rapid infiltration basin
awards further gains in managing our
clean wastewater stream, effectively
conveying large volumes of clean
wastewater quickly and safely to
the ground. As a net positive water
user, we return more water to
the environment than we use to
operate.
We will continue to deliver on our
environmental commitment and
look forward to other initiatives in the
next financial year.
PAGE 20 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PLACE CONTINUED
22,500M2 OF
ADDITIONAL STORAGE
DEDICATION TO
A SINGLE SITE
The second of our six growth initiatives identified during our
The rapid growth of our business has resulted in there being
initial public offering was completed in April 2014.
a shortage of office space. Currently this has been resolved
The 22,500m2 drystore now gives us the capability to
warehouse all finished product and inbound goods at our
Dunsandel headquarters.
The additional space also provides our customers with
increased confidence with packaging and containerisation
for export, now occurring at a single site.
through the purchase or lease of portable buildings. However,
this has long been recognised as a short-term solution.
Our long held vision has been to position our Dunsandel site
as the ‘flagship’ site for the Company. To support this vision a
master planning exercise was undertaken with architecture
firm Jasmax, leading to the existing concept and design that
we have today incorporating a modern administration office
Increased drystore capacity was required to meet our growing
and a state-of-the-art quality testing laboratory.
processing ability with the addition of D3 in 2015.
Following this, Calder Stewart were awarded the construction
However, there was also a need to consolidate our previous
project and have now completed building designs and are
preparing the site for building. Unispace is leading the interior
design and internal fit out of the administration office.
The existing permanent office space will be
refurbished to a high standard to provide
meeting spaces, a café and additional
staff facilities.
Due for completion in June 2015 the
new building will accommodate
all administration staff, physically
connect the administration office and
the manufacturing facilities, support a
number of working styles and promote
our vision of being one team.
We look forward to sharing more about
this project with you in the future.
warehousing options that had become increasingly
fragmented in post-earthquake Christchurch, as the
availability of food grade warehousing had
decreased.
The new drystore has a capacity of
30,000 pallet spaces and increases
total site capacity to 35,000 pallet
spaces.
Storing and exporting
our product from one site
has increased operational
efficiencies. Prior to our increased
capacity, finished produced was
handled a minimum of nine times
before export, today that has reduced to
a minimum of four times.
Less handling of finished product dramatically
reduces our risk of product damage and also reduces our
staffing costs.
In addition to the drystore expansion, the site also features
a new fleet of forklifts. These are equipped with the latest
emissions technology, anti-collision software and speed
limiters that help to keep our people safe.
We are now looking forward to developing further efficiencies
and flexibility with the confirmation of Lyttelton Port and Port
of Tauranga developing in-land ports at Rolleston, a short
distance from our Dunsandel site.
I PAGE 21
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PROCESS
PAGE 22 I Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PROCESS
THE FORMULA OF OUR
BLENDING AND CONSUMER
PACKAGING FACILITY
Our blending and consumer packaging facility was completed
in July 2014.
It was our intention to build the best facility of its type in the
Southern Hemisphere, and feedback from customers who refer
to the plant as ‘next generation’ affirms our goal.
The $29.2 million facility can process 30,000 MT per annum, or
up to 110 cans per minute. The facility is capable of processing
both 400 gram and 900 gram can formats and is designed for
expansion toward other packaging variants.
The plant features leading European equipment and a three-
zone hygiene system. Automation has been effectively used
throughout the line to reduce the amount of physical
handling of product and a purpose built in-
process lab inspects every can that is
processed through the plant.
The commissioning of our
blending and consumer
packaging facility now offers our
customers a complete supply
chain solution from raw milk
sourcing and collection through
to retail packaging with minimal
handling all at our Dunsandel site.
LACTOFERRIN EXTRACTION
AND PURIFICATION FACILITY
Construction of our lactoferrin extraction and purification
facility began in September 2013, with commercial production
starting in April 2014. The project involved a significant
upgrade to our specialty milks dryer (SMD), and the initial
scope was expanded to deliver a pharmaceutical-grade
facility in direct response to customer demand and market
forecasts. The final capital cost was $21.9 million, up from
the original budget of $15.1 million and the FY2014 interim
revised budget of $19.2 million.
Lactoferrin is a key ingredient in infant formula, nutritional
and over the counter (OTC) products. Found naturally in
human breast milk, it offers several health properties through
a range of functions from iron binding ability to having
antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant benefits.
Our facility is one of two world-wide capable of
producing spray-dried lactoferrin. We now
have a process that enables command over
the powder particle shape, density and
morphology that results in improved
dissolvability, coatability and protects
its bio-activity. Coatability is a
crucial component in the production
of tablets, which form the backbone
of the OTC market. Spray-dried
lactoferrin contrasts with the more
commonly freeze-dried and milled
lactoferrin, which often contains particles
that can be more difficult to dissolve,
compress and coat.
Currently, global demand for lactoferrin exceeds supply.
We are targeting sales of 15 MT in FY2015. The global market
for lactoferrin in 2012 was 185 MT, and this is projected to
grow to 262 MT in 2017. We’re looking forward to working
with our customers to apply further innovation in this high
value nutraceutical ingredient.
I PAGE 23
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PROCESS CONTINUED
QUALITY UNDER THE
MICROSCOPE
Located on the ground floor of our new administration building,
construction of our new quality testing laboratory begun in
August 2014 and is due to be completed in June 2015.
A dedicated team has spent the past year designing a
technical centre of excellence to support our vision of
becoming a trusted supplier of choice to the world’s leading
milk-based health and nutrition companies. The centre will
encompass a world class quality testing laboratory, product
development laboratory, pilot scale plant, sensory analysis
facility and finished product / raw material sampling facilities.
Eurofins, a global leader in contracted laboratory services,
have been engaged to incorporate leading edge technologies
and best-in-class operating systems into our design.
Over the past year, we’ve recruited several chemists,
microbiologists and lab specialists to serve on the project
team, and ultimately manage the laboratory on completion.
We will work closely with International Accreditation New
Zealand for independent, best-practice accreditation. This
ensures the laboratory not only fulfils regulatory requirements,
but meets the exacting standards our customers have
come to know and expect from our products and processes.
Additionally, the laboratory will also be certified to ISO 17025
standards, the globally recognised standard developed
This investment will provide several benefits:
specifically for testing laboratories.
− Strengthened internal technical capabilities for food safety,
quality, regulatory compliance and product / process
development.
− Appeal to leading scientists and food technologists.
− Continue our high quality standards consistently and
efficiently.
− Greater control of the quality testing process.
− Improved testing timeframes.
− Faster product release to our customers.
PAGE 24 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014I PAGE 25
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PEOPLE
PAGE 26 I Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PEOPLE
CREATING A
LEADERSHIP CULTURE
delivered in-house by Blue Mercury Leadership. Each person
has completed a continuous improvement project within
the business, and will present their results to the Senior
We continue to invest in developing and growing our people,
Leadership Team in October as part of the course.
giving us great leaders at every level of our business.
With the introduction of Blanchard’s Situational Leadership II
SYNLAIT 101
(SLII) programme in 2013, we now have more than 50 people
Introduced in 2013, our orientation programme for new staff
leaders and emerging leaders fully trained in this cornerstone
has been refined and formalised into a three day overview
leadership model.
Delivered internally by our own certified trainers, SLII
provides a foundation for delivering on our four key leadership
competencies: managerial, customers, personal leadership and
leading others.
All of our people leaders attended our first Leadership
Conference in July 2014. Joined by three Board members,
each person committed to undertaking one positive leadership
action at work.
These commitments range from working closer with
colleagues and improved sharing of knowledge to improving
the communication of our strategic plan and making changes
to the way we hold meetings.
taking place in the first week of starting at the Company.
The programme is designed to help new staff be excited
about their role and understand how different teams work
as one to make more from milk.
The programme gives a complete overview of the journey of
milk from pasture to customer, it also introduces our safety
culture, performance development system and leadership
model helping to build a strong understanding of how the
Company operates from day one.
Presentations from various staff introduce different teams
within the Company, from milk supply to marketing and
energy management to plant operations. A clear focus is on
staff being comfortable in their new environment. A site tour,
warehouse tour and factory tour are given and a tanker trip to
Guest speakers included Graeme Milne (Chairman, Synlait
collect milk from several farms completes the programme.
Milk Board of Directors), Sam Knowles (Director, Synlait
Milk Board of Directors), Richard Smith (High Performance
Leader, Crusaders Rugby Team) and Richard Searle (Mt Eliza
Executive Education).
We also support our current and emerging leaders with a
range of professional development opportunities throughout
the year, including scholarships for Outward Bound and
higher education.
Three staff are currently completing the Waikato Institute
of Technology (WINTEC) Diploma in Dairy Processing. The
qualification focuses on the science behind dairy processes,
giving students a deeper understanding of the manufacturing
process. A year into the qualification, they’re already applying
newly acquired knowledge in their current roles.
EVERYONE HOME SAFE
EVERY DAY
Our focus is on proactive engagement with our people to
continually achieve high participation with our safety systems
and processes. This begins with our new employee programme
and continues with regular updates and monitoring.
Safety the Synlait Way is our unique programme that will
deliver on our health and safety strategy.
It focuses on developing initiatives around the leadership,
capability and engagement of our people, as well as
implementing positive performance indicators through
compliance with a business-wide safety management system.
Nine staff will complete NZQA Certificate of Business (First
You can read more about health and safety in Our Governance
Line Leadership) course, which has been tailored to us and
on page 34.
I PAGE 27
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR PEOPLE CONTINUED
Jamie has recently taken on the role of shift
leader, building on his four years’ of experience
in our production plant. With responsibility for
a shift of 12 staff and five process plants, he’s
excited by the opportunities the Diploma will
create for him. Once he has competed his course,
he will be further qualified to oversee technical
and quality aspects throughout the wider
manufacturing process.
Silvia Dominciano studied animal science in
Brazil and brings several years of New Zealand
dairy farming experience to her role as research
officer in the Quality and Technical Services team.
Silvia’s knowledge of dairy breeding and nutritional
management from farming is useful on a daily
basis. With the addition of dairy manufacturing
knowledge from the Diploma, she contributes
to the high-value products we produce via our
specialty milks dryer (SMD).
Vivian Chen6 brought three years of experience
with the Chinese dairy industry to her role as sales
support officer in May 2013. Joining us directly
from Shanghai, Vivian is now a regional customer
services manager for our customers in China and
meticulously tracks their products throughout
the manufacturing process. From assisting with
canning production forecasting to monitoring
quality grading and managing final logistics, she
contributes significantly to the customer experience
we’re proud of and known for.
Vivian connects customers with our Dunsandel
site on a daily basis, drawing on her personal
knowledge of the China market to help
customers like New Hope and Bright Dairy
understand exactly what’s going on at every step
of the way. Outside of work, Vivian has embraced the
Kiwi culture and is known to give her colleagues a
run for their money in our social touch rugby team.
1
2
3
4
GREAT PEOPLE
We have a strong workplace culture and a
big part of that is the diversity of expertise
and experience amongst our people, which we
encourage to maintain a dynamic and engaging
environment.
We employ approximately 238 people and we’d
like to introduce you to a few.
Liz Ireland1 and Stuart Nicholls2 joined
us as University of Canterbury graduates in
February 2014. Both hold a Masters of Engineering
in Management, and undertook a specialist six-
month project with us in 2013 to complete their
study.
Liz produced a feasibility report for our Quality
and Technical Services team, looking at how
buttermilk - a by-product of anhydrous milk fat
(AMF) manufacture – might be used to produce a
new value-added product.
Stuart supported the Operations team to develop a
production scheduling tool. The tool was designed
to support staff focusing more on processing and
less on scheduling, which is crucial during peak
production periods.
Stuart now works with our Business Planning and
Optimisation team as a manufacturing and quality
analyst. Liz is now a lactoferrin operator in our
5
Manufacturing team, having been a validation
engineer since February 2014.
Aaron Shaw3, Jamie Routhan4 and Silvia
Dominciano5 were awarded scholarships to
study for the New Zealand Diploma in Dairy
Processing in 2013.
Aaron has been with us for five years and is
6
a process leader. His leadership is already
benefiting from his study with a better grasp of
technical problem solving, helping his operating
teams to maintain a high quality product
throughout manufacturing.
PAGE 28 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR FUTURE
In the initial public offering prospectus we outlined a series of
growth initiatives that we had planned to undertake to expand
our capacity and product offerings.
We are now one year into the three year build programme and
have made significant progress on these builds. This report
outlines our current status on each of our significant projects.
1. Blending and Consuming Packaging
2. 22,500m² Drystore
Construction of this plant is complete and it was
The construction of the drystore was completed on time.
commissioned in early July 2014. We have now received
All inventories, previously held on site and across four other
Ministry for Primary Industries approval of our Risk
external locations were consolidated into our full on site
Management Plan, and are therefore able to manufacture
drystore facilities totalling approximately 35,000 m². As
and export products from this plant. Due to enhancements
noted in our Interim Report, the company decided to bring
made to the original specification of the packaging line and
forward the build of the drystore associated with our D3
associated plant, the annual capacity has been increased.
project due to the considerable cost savings available by
building all the additional drystore space at the same time.
Status:
Capacity:
Completed
30,000 MT per annum
Status:
(original capacity 17,500 MT)
Capacity:
Total Cost:
$29.2 million
Completed
22,500 m2
(original capacity 12,500m2)
(original budget $27.5 million)
Total Cost:
$17.0 million (original combined
Commissioned:
July 2014
budget $19.5 million)
Commissioned:
April 2014
I PAGE 29
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR FUTURE CONTINUED
3. Lactoferrin Extraction and Purification Facility
5. Dryer 3
This facility was completed and commissioned on time
The construction of our third large scale spray dryer is
but ahead of previously advised budgets. The additional
underway. This infant formula capable dryer is due to be
capital cost reflected the increased scope of the design of
commissioned in September 2015 in time for the start of
the facility combined with the significant improvements
the FY2016 milk season. The dryer contract was awarded
made to the existing special milks dryer used to spray dry
to Tetra Pak and the new 30 MT boiler was awarded to
the lactoferrin product. In the period to year end 4 MT of
RCR Energy.
lactoferrin powder was manufactured, with 2 MT sold and
delivered. We expect to sell 15 MT of lactoferrin in FY2015.
Status:
Capacity:
Completed
23 MT per annum
Total Cost:
$21.9 million (revised FY2014
Status:
Capacity:
Construction started
10.5 MT per hour on whole milk
powder equivalent (original
capacity 8 MT per hour on whole
milk powder equivalent)
interim report budget
$19.2 million, original budget
$15.1 million)
Commissioned:
April 2014
Expected Total Cost:
$135.0 million
(original budget $103.5 million)
Expected
September 2015
Commissioning Date:
(original date August 2015)
4. Quality Testing Laboratory and Administration
6. Ammix Butter Plant
Building
Construction of our quality testing laboratory and
While planning for the build of a butter plant continues, it is
now likely that the build of this facility will be deferred until
administration building is underway as a combined facility.
The quality testing laboratory includes new product
development facilities and will lead to significantly reduced
FY2016.
Status:
external quality testing costs over time. The administration
Capacity:
offices are being scoped to ensure capacity for future
growth of the business and will allow the Company to
continue to maintain our head office at our Dunsandel site.
Status:
Construction started
Planning
7 MT per hour (25,000 MT per
annum or 40,000 MT per annum
with external cream source).
Expected Total Cost:
$15.0 million
Expected
TBC (original date May 2015)
Expected Total Cost:
$21.0 million
Commissioning Date:
(original budget $8.4 million)
Expected
June 2015 (revised interim
7. Tanker Fleet Yard
Commissioning Date:
report date February 2014,
original date August 2014)
Whilst not part of our major capital works, we have also
undertaken the build of a tanker fleet yard and associated
maintenance workshop for the fleet of milk tankers that are
provided under contract with Hilton Haulage. This facility is
expected to be completed in September 2014 at a cost of
$1.8 million.
PAGE 30 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Environmental
Loadout area
Drystore 3
Proposed
Cold store
Proposed Forklift
Corridor
Proposed Walkway
Packaging
Proposed Packing 3
Office Extension and
Laboratory
Blending
Dryer 3
Proposed Butter
Lactoferrin
Proposed
Maintenance
Store & Workshop
Proposed Reception 2
Proposed Boiler 3
Proposed Security
Control
ON THE MAP THE
AREAS IN DARKER
BLUE ARE COMMENCED
PROJECTS WITH THOSE
IN LIGHTER BLUE STILL
IN THE PLANNING.
I PAGE 31
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR REMUNERATION
PAGE 32 I Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR REMUNERATION CONTINUED
We have an established Remuneration Policy.
second is that certain annual compound growth targets in total
Our aim is to attract, reward and retain staff with skills and
shareholder returns (TSR) reaches the following set targets:
capabilities to ensure the successful business outcomes by
TSR
providing a remuneration environment focused on
productivity, performance and accountability.
The Remuneration and Governance Committee oversees
the operation of our Remuneration Policy, and monitors
20% or more
15%
12%
the overall budgets for all employees. The Committee also
Less than 12%
Annual entitlement
as a % of base salary
25%
18.75%
6.25%
0%
recommends to the Board, for approval, the remuneration and
bonus arrangements for our Senior Leadership Team and the
Managing Director.
Our Senior Leadership Team and our employees’ remuneration
details (including the Managing Director’s) are set out in the
‘Statutory Information’ section. We also assess our Senior
Leadership Team’s performance annually and director’s fees
biennially (the last assessment was in 2013).
We have the following share incentive plans in place for our staff:
If all targets (including FY2014) were met, the total cost of the
scheme would approximate $1.9m.
The FY2014 targets were not met.
− Staff Short Term Incentive Share Scheme:
The targets were not met and the Scheme is therefore now
expired. For further information about the scheme please refer
to note 21 of the annual finanical statements.
− Senior Employee IPO Incentive Scheme:
This scheme provides an incentive to retain senior executive’s
SHORT TERM
INCENTIVE SCHEME
post IPO for a period of 3 years, vesting a set number of
We have a short term performance bonus scheme operating at
Synlait shares in each of them depending on the number of
various levels across our organisation.
performance hurdles which have been met in each year. The
maximum value opportunity per senior executive participating
in the scheme is 75% of their base remuneration as at 1
August 2013. They can receive up to a maximum value of
25% of their base salary, by way of rights to shares valued at
the IPO price, which will only vest at the end of the three year
period, post IPO, on the condition that they are still employed
at Synlait Milk and that the share price at that point is above
the IPO price.
For employees below Senior Leadership Team level the short
term incentive opportunity ranges from 5% to 15% of the base
remuneration and is based on a mixture of Company profit,
team and individual objectives. At Senior Leader manager
level the short term incentive opportunity ranges from 20%
of based remuneration for direct reports to the Managing
Director and 40% of base remuneration for the Managing
Director. The staff, including Senior Leadership Team, short
term incentive is awarded based on exceeding budgeted
The performance hurdles are split into two separate Company
NPAT (40%), and personal performance hurdles (60%).
goals. The first is ensuring the Company over-performs on our
budgeted net profit after tax (NPAT) by 10% or more, and the
SUPERANNUATION
We participate in Kiwi Saver, and pay the employer
contribution of 3% to all employees participating in Kiwi Saver.
I PAGE 33
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR GOVERNANCE
Our momentum continues to build due to our strong
make ‘More from Milk,’ but also make more from ourselves,
governance framework and continual focus on implementing
efficiently and effectively managing Synlait Milk to deliver on
effective policies that create excellence within the workplace.
the results we all expect.
You will already know that Synlait Milk Limited is a limited
We are a non-standard Company in terms of NZX listing
liability company under the Companies Act 1993, and that we
requirements, with certain waivers from the NZX to this
are listed on the Main Board of the NZX since 23 July 2013
effect. More details on the NZX waivers are detailed in our
(see the code “SML” on www.nzx.com ).
Statutory Information section (page 98), but generally the
While we are a young public company, we are very fortunate
waivers concern the appointment of our Directors.
to have a track record of a very strong governance framework
Our Board has up to eight Directors, and while our major
before we were listed.
In 2014 we have continued from this excellent foundation, and
have made further improvements designed to ensure we are a
professionally run organisation you can trust.
shareholder Bright Dairy holds at least 37% of our shares,
Bright Dairy may appoint up to four of those Directors -
one of whom must be a New Zealand resident who is an
experienced director. We are fortunate to have one of our long-
serving Board members, the Honourable Ruth Richardson, to
Some of our governance highlights for 2014 are:
fulfil this role.
− Extensive review and fine tuning of our Delegated
We also must have a Managing Director who cannot be a
Authorities Policy to better align the relevant levels and
Bright Dairy Director (John Penno), and three independent
ensuring any perceived risk areas are well covered.
Directors (Sam Knowles, Graeme Milne and Bill Roest). Our
− Development and adoption of an integrated Risk
Management Framework.
− Full external review of the performance of our Board,
individual Directors and suggestions for improvements.
− Full review and confirmation of our Strategic Plan -
including a refresh of our 5 Year Plan and development
independent Directors not only satisfy these requirements,
but also bring considerable expertise and experience to the
Board table.
All our Directors are profiled on page 39 of this Annual Report.
A third of our independent Directors will retire each year, and
Bright Dairy may appoint their Directors as they wish (but
one must always be a New Zealand resident, experienced
of our 10 Year Strategic Plan.
Director).
We continue to be proud of what we have achieved to date,
and the way our Company is managed.
OUR BOARD
Our Board is responsible for the overall corporate governance
of Synlait Milk, including strategic direction, determination
of policy, approval of significant contracts/projects, capital
and operating budgets and overall stewardship of our
In 2013 at our last Annual General Meeting (AGM), John
Penno, Sam Knowles and Graeme Milne all retired and were
re-elected unopposed to their Director position. At the Annual
General Meeting, scheduled for December 2014, Bill Roest
will be retiring in accordance with our Constitution but is
standing for re-election.
More details can be found in our Constitution, at the following
link: www.synlait.com/site/uploads/2013/07/Synlait-Milk-
organisation. Our Board is committed to ensuring we not only
Limited-Constitution.pdf
PAGE 34 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
In 2014 we conducted a full review of the performance of our
managed and governed at all times. Both committees meet at
Board and all Directors. This was facilitated by an external
least four times a year, but are also available at any stage to
consultancy firm, who separately talked to each Director.
consider any issue within their responsibility.
The major findings from this review:
We also have a standing committee appointed:
− The Board is functioning to a high level in terms of
− Disclosure Committee – chaired by the Managing
“…efficiency, strong ethics, trust and thoroughness in
Director (other members being the Chair of the Board and
carrying out the process of Board meetings and conducting
the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with an alternate member
business of the Board.”
− The Board “…has developed clear protocols in its
frequency of meetings, distribution of papers and
managing the minutes and outcomes of Board meetings in
order to govern the organisation and drive its performance.”
Areas agreed for focus next year for the Board, are:
being the Chair of Audit and Risk Committee). It monitors
compliance by the Company and staff in relation to our
Share Trading Policy and Guidelines, and ensures that all
“material information” that is required to be disclosed to
the market under the NZX Listing Rules is immediately
disclosed.
− An increased focus on in-depth workshop sessions for the
POLICIES AND CHARTERS
Board on more complex issues.
− Continuing in-market visits and development of industry
and customer engagement.
− Assess the development opportunities for individual
Directors.
In 2013, a major new initiative was the completion of the
integrated Risk Management Framework for the Company.
This is a series of policies and plans which tie together the
various risk management structures we already have in place
in the Company, and then report those up through the Senior
Leadership Team and ultimately to the Board.
OUR BOARD COMMITTEES
We have the following permanent Board committees:
− Audit and Risk Committee – chaired by independent
Director Bill Roest (other members – Dong Zongbo,
Graeme Milne). It is charged with monitoring our internal
control and risk management systems, financial reporting
obligations, independent audit process and ensuring we
comply at all times with all applicable laws, regulations,
listing rules and our own company policies and procedures.
− Remuneration and Governance Committee – chaired
by Hon. Ruth Richardson (other members – Graeme
Milne, Li Ke, Sam Knowles). It is charged with ensuring
our commitment to health and safety, best practice
employment and fair and proper remuneration is
maintained at all times. The Committee is also responsible
for ensuring all training and development, and proper
governance structures are in place and being properly used
at all levels of the Company.
Both committees have Charters governing their operation,
membership and remit to ensure that Synlait Milk is optimally
The Framework consists of the:
− Risk Management Policy: This sets out the high-level
appetite of the Company for risk and identifies the major
risk categories. It established the Board’s commitment
to risk management. The Policy links all the underlying
documents together (so provides the overall Risk
Management Framework).
− Risk Management Procedures & Guidelines: This is
a more detailed document, that sets out how we identify
and define what is a “risk” (as opposed to an “incident” or
a “hazard”), sets the levels for the severity and likelihood
of a risk occurring (producing a “risk assessment”), and
introduces the capturing of risks in functional areas
through the Risk Matrix.
− Crisis Management Plan: Defines what is a “crisis”,
and puts the practical operational procedures in place
to manage that crisis event should it ever occur.
− Incident Management Plan: Defines what is an
“incident” and puts the operational procedures in place
to manage an incident.
I PAGE 35
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
We have also successfully conducted three dry-run trials of
− Treasury Management Policy: Is our internal policy for
our Crisis Management Plan, involving various levels of the
managing our foreign exchange, debt, interest rates and
Company in hypothetical scenarios.
related financial activities. This is actively managed, and
Our development of a sustainability and environmental policy
forms part of our essential internal controls.
is still a work in progress, but we have made significant
− Sales Policy: This sets out our internal commercial
progress. The environment plan template within our “Lead
position with respect to our sales of products to customers,
With PrideTM programme was approved by Environment
in terms of pricing, volumes, reporting and forecasting.
Canterbury as the first farm environment plan template under
the proposed Land & Water Regional Plan. We are also are
currently going through a revised District Plan process.
− Continuous Disclosure Policy: This ensures we
immediately inform the market of any material information,
and have in place proper management processes to ensure
Also in 2014 we continued with the implementation of the
this is a discipline throughout the whole organisation.
Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord. This is dealt with in more
The Disclosure Committee is responsible for monitoring
detail in the Our Place section of this Annual Report (page 20).
compliance with this policy.
In addition, in accordance with recognised best practice
− Securities Trading Policy and Guidelines: This is to
governance, we have in place the following essential corporate
ensure all our staff and Directors appreciate the special role
governance documents (amongst others):
they hold, and ensure they operate ethically and properly
− Board Charter: This guides our Board in terms of
objectives and rules to make sure we always follow
our Constitution, statutory duties and other corporate
obligations.
− Board Code of Ethics: This sets the moral compass
for our Directors in all Synlait Milk matters – ensuring
professionalism, ethical conduct and best practice is
maintained at the Board table and beyond by all our
in relation to any personal activity. This includes express
“black-out” periods for special classes of our staff with
in-depth financial and Company knowledge. It also has a
detailed reporting regime to ensure compliance.
− Directors’ Conflict of Interest Policy: This ensures all
our Directors appreciate and know how to manage and
mitigate any impact on our Synlait Milk operations relative
to their own personal affairs.
Directors. An important part of the Code is the use of
− Related Transaction Policy: This ensures any major
Company information by Directors, which safeguards
shareholders are treated purely on an arms-length basis,
Company confidential information.
and in the best interests of Synlait at all times.
− Audit and Risk Committee Charter and Remuneration
− Delegated Authorities Policy: This is the operational
and Governance Committee Charter: For each
guide for our Board and all staff in the day-to-day
Committee, its Charter sets out the objectives, authorities,
operations of Synlait Milk, ensuring a proper degree of
roles and responsibilities and operational rules for the
accountability and control is maintained at all times, and
respective members to ensure they deliver on their
allowing risk to be properly apportioned and managed.
governance requirements.
PAGE 36 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
− Employee Handbook: Apart from the operational
HEALTH AND SAFETY
aspects of working at Synlait Milk, this Handbook has
the professional obligations and ethics expected of all
staff, and also a protected disclosures regime (whistle-
blowers provisions) – ensuring any major problems can
be immediately brought to Senior Leadership Team or the
Board’s attention without fear of any negative reaction.
We appreciate that the success of our business depends on
our excellent staff, and so their wellbeing is of vital importance
to us. Accordingly, we have a continuing commitment to
health, safety and wellness at Synlait Milk.
Our vision is: Everyone home safe every day.
All the above Policies, Charters and Codes are to be reviewed
Our objectives are:
at least annually by the Board or applicable Board Committee
to ensure they continue to deliver the optimal structure for
- Zero exposure to uncontrolled risks.
governing our Company going forward.
- Fatal (critical) risk focus.
We have many other internal policies and procedures to
- Zero injury accidents.
ensure we are an efficiently and effectively run organisation.
- Healthy and well, living life in balance.
For more information on our publicly available Policies
and Charters, please visit our investor relations section
on our website at www.synlait.com/investors/corporate-
governance/.
The Directors’ disclosures of interest are set out in Statutory
Information section (page 96).
OUR OPERATIONS
We are developing a fully integrated approach to health and
safety matters – maintaining our present focus of strong
operational systems and procedures, and continuing our
emphasis on rehabilitation in the event of injury or incident.
Over the next three years we have committed, as an
organisation, to migrate our present workplace safety
management practices approach into a wider Synlait Milk
safety management system. This will be achieved through a
All of our Board members have access to all relevant Synlait
comprehensive review of all health, safety and wellness risks
Milk information, and are fully briefed before each Board
using the “Bow Tie” risks and control measures assessment
meeting. They are provided with minutes of past meetings,
approach, and by us implementing a new system to capture
and have available the Synlait Milk Company Secretary and
risks, hazards and incidents.
Synlait Milk management to answer any questions or to
respond to any issues at any time.
Included in our safety initiatives is a review of our safety
on-boarding processes and information, rollout training in
Our Board has determined we are in compliance with all NZX
ICAM root cause investigation methodology (Incident, Cause,
Listing Rules and applicable legal requirements.
Analysis, Method), review of our employee participation
systems and a move to a focus on measuring total recordable
injury frequency rate (TRIFR). We will report on our TRIFR
achievement in our next Annual Report.
I PAGE 37
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
LEFT TO RIGHT;
BILL ROEST,
SIHANG YANG,
RUTH RICHARDSON,
GRAEME MILNE,
KE LI,
JOHN PENNO,
ZONGBO DONG
SAM KNOWLES
PAGE 38 I
The Board of Directors in the recently completed drystore. For Health and Safety Purposes containerisation was not operational during this photo-shoot.
Willem (Bill) Jan Roest
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
(INDEPENDENT), CHAIR OF THE
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
Bill was appointed to the Synlait
Milk Board in May 2013. He is a
director of Synlait Milk Limited and
Synlait Milk Finance Limited.
Bill’s long and varied career
included 12 years as Chief Financial
Officer of Fletcher Building
Limited until April 2013. He has
held several leadership roles in
New Zealand’s corporate sector,
including Managing Director of
Fletcher Residential and Fletcher
Aluminium.
Bill is also a director of Housing
Foundation Limited, Metro
Performance Glass and Fisher
and Paykel Appliances Holdings
Limited, where he chairs the Audit
Committee. Bill is a member of the
Institute of Directors, Chartered
Accountants Australia and New
Zealand and an Association of
Chartered Certified Accountants
(UK) fellow.
Sihang Yang
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
Yang was appointed a director of
Synlait Milk in August 2010. With 15
years of industry experience, he is
Bright Dairy & Food Co.’s director of
strategy and research and director
of several Bright Dairy subsidiaries.
Yang previously worked for
Heilongjiang Dairy Group as
the director of technology and
subsequently as the director of
quality assurance. He was later
appointed the secretary-general
of Heilongjiang Dairy Industry
Association and a director of China
Dairy Industry Association.
Yang is currently a director of
Synlait Milk Limited, Synlait Milk
Finance Limited and Zhejiang Hai
Hua Dairy Co., Ltd. He holds a
master’s degree in food science and
engineering.
Hon. Ruth Margaret
Richardson
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHAIR OF
REMUNERATION AND GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE
A professional company director,
Ruth specialises in agribusiness,
commercialising innovation,
information technology and finance.
Ruth joined the Synlait Group as the
first independent director in 2004.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ruth was the Member of Parliament
for Selwyn (Synlait Milk’s base)
from 1981 – 1984 and later New
Zealand’s Minister of Finance from
1990 to 1993.
Following her political career, Ruth
established herself as a public
policy consultant and accepted
a range of corporate governance
roles. Ruth is currently Chairman of
Jade Software Corporation Limited,
SYFT Technologies Limited, Kiwi
Innovation Network Limited
(Kiwinet), The New Zealand Merino
Company and the Kula Fund
Advisory.
She is a director of Synlait Milk
Limited, Synlait Milk Finance
Limited. Previous governance
roles include Dairy Brands, the
Reserve Bank of New Zealand and
Wrightson Limited. Ruth holds a
Bachelor of Laws (with honours)
from the University of Canterbury.
Graeme Roderick Milne
CHAIRMAN (INDEPENDENT)
Graeme joined the Synlait Group as
a director in 2006. With extensive
experience, his career in the dairy
industry has seen him working in
New Zealand, Australia and Europe.
He is the Chairman of Synlait Milk
Limited and Synlait Milk Finance
Limited.
Graeme was appointed CEO of
Bay Milk Products in 1992, and has
held several leadership roles since
then. This included CEO of the New
Zealand Dairy Group prior to the
formation of Fonterra and interim
CEO of Richmond Limited and
Bonlac Limited in Australia.
Now a farmer, Graeme maintains
several governance roles with
a range of organisations. He is
the chairman of the Terracare
Fertilisers Limited, New Zealand
Pharmaceuticals Limited and
Johnes Disease Research Limited.
Graeme is also a director of Genesis
Energy Limited, FMG and Alliance
Group Limited.
Ke Li
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
Li was appointed a director of
Synlait Milk in August 2010. Li is
currently a director of Synlait Milk
Limited and Synlait Milk Finance
Limited.
Li has worked for Bright Dairy for
over 12 years. During her years
at Bright Dairy, Li’s sales and
marketing expertise has helped
the significant growth of many
different Bright Dairy brands,
including the Bright brand. Li leads
the team tasked with promoting
Pure CanterburyTM infant formula
products in China, which has
achieved remarkable growth in the
last few years.
A vice president of Bright Dairy
& Food Co., Ltd and head of
marketing, Li also heads Bright
Dairy’s public relations department.
She is a director of a number of
Bright Dairy subsidiaries. Li holds a
Master of Business Administration
from La Trobe University, Melbourne.
John William Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
(NON-INDEPENDENT)
John co-founded the Synlait Group
in 2000 and has been a full-time
executive for the Synlait Group
for the last 11 years. With the
appointment of Graeme Milne as
an independent chairman of Synlait
Limited in 2006, John stood down
from his initial role as executive
chair to focus on the Managing
Director role.
After completing an Agricultural
Science degree, John commenced
his career in the dairy industry as
a consulting officer for the New
Zealand Dairy Board before joining
Dexcel as a research scientist
where he completed a PhD in
animal science. As a scientist and
research program leader he worked
to enable New Zealand dairy
farmers to increase productivity
and profit.
In 2000, John was appointed
General Manager of the NZ National
Dairy Industry Extension Program,
which serviced farm owners,
workers and rural professionals.
John was appointed as Managing
Director of Synlait Milk on 21
June 2013. John is also currently
a director of Synlait Milk Finance
Limited, Synlait Farms Limited
(which is a supplier of raw milk
to Synlait Milk) and Synlait Farms
Finance Limited. In the past five
years John has also been a director
of Dairy Insight, Axe Brasil Limited,
Synlait Limited and a number of
companies associated with the
Synlait Group and / or dairy farms.
John was the inaugural Chairman
of the Dairying and Environment
Leadership Group. John is a
member of the New Zealand
China Council Advisory Board. In
2009, John received an emerging
leader’s award from the Sir Peter
Blake Trust and was also awarded
the Federated Farmers inaugural
agribusiness person of the year.
Zongbo Dong
BRIGHT DAIRY APPOINTED DIRECTOR
Dong was appointed a director
of Synlait Milk in August 2010.
Currently he is a director of Synlait
Milk Limited and Synlait Milk
Finance Limited.
Since 1985, Dong has worked in
accounting and finance roles for the
dairy industry. Dong was appointed
vice general manager and CFO
of Shanghai Danone Yogurt and
Cheese Co., Ltd. in the 1990s.
He oversaw 16 Bright Group
subsidiaries merge into the Bright
Dairy & Food Co., Ltd. structure.
He became CFO for Bright Dairy
& Food Co., Ltd in 2007. Dong is
currently a director and supervisor
for a number of Bright Dairy
subsidiaries, is a member of the
Institute of Public Accountants
(Australia) and has certification
granted by China Association of
Chief Financial Officers.
Sam Knowles
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
(INDEPENDENT)
Sam has held senior executive
positions in major banks in both
Australia and New Zealand, and is
currently a director of Synlait Milk
Limited and Synlait Milk Finance
Limited.
He has extensive experience
in private and public sector
governance, with more than 12
years on several boards of NZX
listed companies, including as
Chairman of Xero. He had a key role
in establishing Kiwibank, leading
the company from being a start-up
to a large successful business.
Sam’s governance roles focus on
growth businesses. He is Chairman
of Partners Life, OnBrand Partners
and Umajin Limited. Sam is also a
director of TrustPower, SLI Systems,
Magritek and Rangatira.
I PAGE 39
SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT;
MICHAEL STEIN
NEIL BETTERIDGE
NATALIE LOMBE
JOHN PENNO
MIKE LEE
NIGEL GREENWOOD
MATTHEW FOSTER
PAGE 40 I
The Senior Leadership Team in the recently completed containerisation yard. For Health and Safety Purposes containerisation was not operational during this photo-shoot.
SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM
Michael Stein
GENERAL MANAGER QUALITY
AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
Michael Stein joined Synlait Milk
in June 2013 and is responsible
for providing strategic leadership
for quality across the Synlait Milk
business. Michael leads a team
of quality assurance, technical
and other professionals with the
objective of ensuring that Synlait
Milk continuously improves its
quality systems to deliver safe,
high quality dairy ingredients and
nutritional products that meet
our customer’s expectations and
regulatory requirements in the
markets we serve.
Michael brings to Synlait Milk
over 20 years of global quality
management experience in the
infant formula, nutritional products
and medical foods business. His
most recent role was Director of
Quality for Mead Johnson Nutrition,
Asia-Pacific where he led quality
and technical teams at business
units and manufacturing sites
across China, South East Asia,
Oceania and the Middle East.
During his career, Michael also held
quality, food safety and laboratory
leadership roles with Nestle
Nutrition, Nestle USA and Nutricia,
Inc. Michael earned his Bachelor
of Science degree in Microbiology
from the Ohio State University.
Neil Betteridge
GENERAL MANAGER MANUFACTURING
Neil joined Synlait Milk in 2007
after 10 years with Fonterra. Neil
currently leads a manufacturing
team of more than 120 people and
is responsible for the execution of
sound manufacturing processes
across the entire Synlait Milk plant.
He also leads the development of
our Infant Formula and Nutritional
product manufacturing capabilities.
Neil has been involved with the
design and construction of the
various phases of the Synlait Milk
site.
Since completing a Bachelor of
Chemical & Process Engineering
with honours from the University
of Canterbury and a Post
Graduate Diploma in Dairy
Science & Technology, Neil’s
career has included working with
manufacturing processes for a
variety of dairy products.
Neil is a member of the New
Zealand Institute of Food Science
and Technology and a Chartered
Professional Engineer.
Natalie Lombe
GENERAL MANAGER CULTURE,
CAPABILITY AND STRATEGY
Natalie joined Synlait Milk in
January 2011 and is responsible for
leading initiatives to develop fully
enabled and engaged staff as well
as facilitation of strategic planning
process. Natalie also oversees the
human resource, payroll and health
and safety functions.
Prior to joining Synlait Milk, Natalie
held senior human resource
positions with Christchurch
International Airport, Goodman
Fielder, Mainland Products and
Allied Telesys, together with
extensive human resource and
change management experience
working in a number of fast moving
consumer goods industries in
Australia.
Natalie holds a Post Graduate
Diploma in Dispute Resolution and
a Bachelor of Business majoring
in human resources and industrial
relations, and is a member of the
Human Resources Institute of New
Zealand.
John Penno
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
MANAGING DIRECTOR
John co-founded the Synlait Group
in 2000 and has been a full-time
executive for the Synlait Group
for the last 11 years. With the
appointment of Graeme Milne as
an independent chairman of Synlait
Limited in 2006, John stood down
from his initial role as executive
chair to focus on the Managing
Director role.
After completing an Agricultural
Science degree, John commenced
his career in the dairy industry as
a consulting officer for the New
Zealand Dairy Board before joining
Dexcel as a research scientist
where he completed a PhD in
animal science. As a scientist and
research program leader he worked
to enable New Zealand dairy
farmers to increase productivity
and profit.
In 2000, John was appointed
General Manager of the NZ National
Dairy Industry Extension Program,
which serviced farm owners,
workers and rural professionals.
John was appointed as Managing
Director of Synlait Milk on 21
June 2013. John is also currently
a director of Synlait Milk Finance
Limited, Synlait Farms Limited
(which is a supplier of raw milk
to Synlait Milk) and Synlait Farms
Finance Limited. In the past five
years John has also been a director
of Dairy Insight, Axe Brasil Limited,
Synlait Limited and a number of
companies associated with the
Synlait Group and / or dairy farms.
John was the inaugural Chairman
of the Dairying and Environment
Leadership Group. John is a
member of the New Zealand
China Council Advisory Board. In
2009, John received an emerging
leader’s award from the Sir Peter
Blake Trust and was also awarded
the Federated Farmers inaugural
agribusiness person of the year.
Mike Lee
GENERAL MANAGER SALES
Mike joined Synlait Milk in
September 2011 and leads sales,
business development and overall
category profitability. Mike worked
for Fonterra and the NZ Dairy Board
for 14 years in sales, marketing
and business development roles
in the international ingredient
business, including working for 10
years in Europe, Asia and Australia.
Mike has worked extensively with
both commodity and added value
ingredients.
Mike worked for seven years
in two research and innovation
organisations involved in
environmental research and
biomaterials, leading the business
and technology commercialisation
functions including various start-
up and growth businesses. Mike
has a degree in Food Technology
and a Diploma in Business and is
really enjoying his return to the
international dairy industry.
Nigel Greenwood
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Nigel has had extensive experience
in finance, having held senior
executive finance roles with
various New Zealand companies.
As CFO, Nigel is responsible for
finance, funding, legal, information
technology and strategy.
Prior to joining Synlait Milk in April
2010, Nigel held CFO roles with
Crane Distribution NZ Limited,
Gough Group Limited and Lyttelton
Port Company Limited.
Nigel is a member of the Chartered
Accountants Australia and New
Zealand and the Institute of
Directors. Nigel has a Bachelor of
Commerce (majoring in accounting)
and has completed the General
Manager Program at the University
of Michigan.
Matthew Foster
GENERAL MANAGER SUPPLY CHAIN
Matthew joined Synlait Milk in
February 2012 and is responsible for
managing and developing Synlait
Milk’s supply chain activities
from farmer to customer. He
brings a wealth of supply chain
management and dairy industry
experience to Synlait Milk after a 20
year career with the New Zealand
Dairy Board and Fonterra where he
held senior management positions
in the United Kingdom, Australia,
Japan, the Americas and New
Zealand.
Before joining Synlait Milk,
Matthew was CEO at NZL Group
and prior to that General Manager
Commercial for Tasman Orient
Line. Matthew is a member of the
Chartered Accountants Australia
and New Zealand and holds a
Bachelor of Management Studies
from the University of Waikato.
I PAGE 41
OUR FINANCIAL REVIEW
Nigel Greenwood
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PAGE 42 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
Our revenue for FY2014 of $601 million increased 43.0% on
We have estimated our product sales phasing financial cost
our FY2013 result of $420 million, primarily driven by higher
at $6.5 million caused by the rapid decline in international
international commodity prices that prevailed for most the
commodity prices during the last five months of FY2014. In
year. The average US dollar commodity price in FY2014 was
addition, we have estimated that our annual average NZ
USD $4,650 compared with USD $3,460 in FY2013. Total
dollar to US dollar exchange rate for FY2014, at 0.813 cents,
volume shipped for FY2014 was 93,644 MT, an increase of
is expected to be higher than that applied in the calculation
8.0% on our FY2013 result of 86,746 MT shipped.
of the farm gate milk price resulting in an estimated cost of
Ingredient sales volumes in FY2014 at 87,248 MT was
7.6% ahead of our FY2013 result of 81,085 MT. Infant and
nutritional sales volumes in FY2014 at 6,396 MT were only
slightly ahead of 5,661 MT in FY2013 and well below our
prospective financial information (PFI) volumes of 11,684 MT.
As noted in the Managing Directors capital report our sales
of infant formula products were significantly impacted by the
regulatory changes in China that were implemented during
the course of FY2014.
Our gross profit for FY2014 at $77.1 million increased 18.4% on
our FY2013 result of $65.1 million and was in line with our PFI
of $76.4 million. However, this result was primarily achieved
via a one off product mix benefit estimated to be $24.5 million.
There were a number of significant costs incurred during
FY2014 that impacted on our gross margin performance in
$4.1 million.
The cost of milk purchased remains our most significant
cost when determining gross profit. Our final base milk price
for FY2014 is $8.27 per kgMS, significantly higher than our
FY2013 base milk price of $5.81 per kgMS. In addition, we
paid $0.04 per kgMS in seasonal and value added premiums
to increase the average total milk price to $8.31 per kgMS
compared with $5.89 per kgMS in FY2013.
EBITDA at $43.8 million increased 13.8% on FY2013 result
of $38.5 million and was in line with our PFI of $44.0 million.
Overheads, including depreciation, at $44.7 million had
increased $6.3 million on our FY2013 result of $38.4 million,
mainly due to the increased investment in staff during FY2014.
However, these costs were in line with our PFI at $44.4 million.
comparison to our PFI gross margin. The main impacts were
Net finance costs at $5.3 million in FY2014 are well down on
as follows:
− The anticipated margin on infant formula sales not
achieved. $8.3 million.
− Stock provisions and write offs on infant formula
inventories. $7.5 million.
− Product sales phasing estimated costs. $6.5 million.
− Foreign exchange impact. $4.1 million.
our FY2013 costs of $12.3 million, primarily due to the benefit
of the net initial public offering (IPO) proceeds of $68.9 million
received late July 2013 being applied against our term debt.
The net finance costs are ahead of our PFI of $4.8 million due
to higher working capital interest costs driven by the higher
inventory and receivables values as a result of the very high
commodity prices prevailing during FY2014.
Our FY2014 NPAT at $19.6 million increased 70% on our
FY2013 result of $11.5 million and slightly behind of our
The lower infant formula margin together with the associated
PFI of $19.7 million.
infant formula provisions and write-offs totalling $15.8 million
primarily relate to manufactured infant formula inventories
that were unable to be sold into the China market as a result
of the Regulatory changes. Some of these inventories have
expired and have since been sold as stock food, while the
remainder have been provided to estimated net realisable
values in order to sell this product.
This resulted in basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of
13.40 cents in FY2014 against 10.21 cents in FY2013. It also
generated a pre-tax return on average capital employed of
11.5% in FY2014 compared with 13.1% in FY2013.
I PAGE 43
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED
FINANCIAL POSITION
Due to the growth in retained earnings our total shareholders
funds increased to $183 million in FY2014, an increase of
11.6% over FY2013 balance at $164 million. However, our
shareholders funds to total tangible assets dropped from
47.4% in FY2013 to 38.4% in FY2014 driven by the growth in
both current and fixed assets. Total shareholders funds were
in line with our PFI at $185 million.
Total tangible assets in FY2014 were at $472 million an
increase of 38% over $342 million in FY2013 and were also
above our PFI of $380 million. Current assets in FY2014
were up $43 million when compared to FY2013 and $75
Further information on our growth initiative projects are set
out earlier in the report on pages 29 to 31.
CASH FLOW
Cash flow from FY2014 operating activities of $59 million
reflects a forecast reversal from FY2013 cash outflows of
$47 million. However, our result was $23 million below the
PFI primarily due to higher working capital balances for
receivables and inventory at year end.
The cash investment in our capital projects at $96 million
primarily reflected the build of our growth initiative projects
during FY2014 and was above our PFI of $69 million for the
million higher than PFI. The primary cause of this was both
reasons already noted earlier in this report.
Net cash inflows from financing activities in FY2014 at $39
million had decreased by $17 million on our FY2013 result
of $56 million this was primarily due to the net impact of
increased borrowings of $80 million, associated with our
investment in capital growth initiative projects during FY2014,
offset by the net proceeds from the IPO of $69 million in
FY2013.
Our net debt position at the end of FY2014 was $152 million,
$46 million higher than the $106 million in FY2013 and $65
million higher than our PFI of $87 million. The causes of these
increases over both FY2013 and our PFI have been addressed
earlier in this report.
Nigel Greenwood
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
receivables and inventory values had increased due to higher
commodity prices than in FY2013 and from our PFI. This
drove high receivables and inventory values for FY2014. Our
investment in fixed assets have increased to the build of our
new drystore, lactoferrin extraction and purification facility
and blending and consumer packaging plant as well as the
initial costs associated with the build of dryer three.
Total liabilities for FY2014 grew to $294 million an increase
of 61% over $182 million in FY2013 and well above our PFI of
$195 million. A significant cause of this increase was the level
of trade and other payables which at $117 million were well
above our FY2013 balance at $58 million and the PFI at $87
million. This was due to the higher than anticipated milk price
in FY2014 increasing the milk supplier liability at year end.
Loans and borrowings at $91 million had also increased on
our FY2013 position at $28 million and the PFI at $47 million.
While term debt in FY2014 was expected to increase due to
our investment in our growth initiative projects, the amount
is $44 million more than PFI due to a number of reasons:
− A decision to bring forward the build of drystore
three. $5.2 million.
− Increased spend on the lactoferrin extraction and
purification facility. $6.8 million.
− Earlier than anticipated costs associated with the build of
dryer three. $17.7 million.
− Deferment of voluntary repayment on the revolver facility
until FY2015. $18.8 million.
PAGE 44 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014I PAGE 45
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OUR
MOMENTUM
IN DOLLARS
AND CENTS
PAGE 46 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014SYNLAIT MILK LIMITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 JULY 2014
CONTENTS
Directors’ Responsibility Statement
Financial Statements
Statement of Comprehensive Income
Statement of Changes in Equity
Statement of Financial Position
Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
1 Reporting entity
2 Basis of preparation
3 Summary of significant accounting policies
4 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
5 Segment information
6 Revenue
7 Expenses
8 Finance income and expenses
9 Income tax
10 Current assets - Cash and cash equivalents
11 Current assets - Trade and other receivables
12 Current assets - Inventories
13 Non-current assets - Other financial assets
14 Non-current assets - Property, plant and equipment
15 Non-current assets - Intangible assets
16 Trade and other payables
17 Advances from subsidiary
18 Loans and borrowings
19 Deferred tax assets and liabilities
20 Share capital
21 Share-based payments
22 Reserves and retained earnings
23 Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash inflow from operating activities
24 Financial risk management
25 Financial instruments
26 Contingencies
27 Commitments
28 Related party transactions
29 Investments in subsidiaries
30 Comparison of prospective financial information
31 Events occurring after the reporting period
Auditor’s Report
PAGE
48
49
50
52
53
54
54
54
55
62
63
62
63
64
64
66
66
67
67
68
70
70
71
71
72
73
74
76
77
78
83
86
86
87
89
89
93
94
I PAGE 47
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
AS AT 31 JULY 2014
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
The Directors are pleased to present the financial statements for Synlait Milk Limited and its subsidiary set out on pages 49 to 93
for the year ended 31 July 2014.
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of Synlait
Milk Limited and its subsidiary (together ‘the Group’) as at 31 July 2014 and the financial performance and cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
The Directors consider that the financial statements of the Group have been prepared using appropriate accounting policies,
consistently applied and supported by reasonable judgements and estimates and that all relevant financial reporting and
accounting standards have been followed.
The Directors believe that proper accounting records have been kept which enable, with reasonable accuracy, the determination of
the financial position of the Group and facilitate compliance of the financial statements with the Financial Reporting Act 1993.
For and on behalf of the Board.
Graeme Milne
CHAIRMAN
19 September 2014
John Penno
MANAGING DIRECTOR
19 September 2014
PAGE 48 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 JULY 2014
Group
Year ended
2014
$’000
Notes
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
6
7
6
7
7
8
8
8
9
9
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Sales and distribution expenses
Administrative and operating expenses
Earnings before net finance expense and income tax
Finance expenses
Finance income
Net finance costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Net profit after tax for the year
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to
profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit
and loss
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive income for the year
Earnings per Share
600,518
420,010
600,518
420,010
(523,430)
(354,862)
(523,430)
(354,862)
77,088
65
(27,760)
(16,954)
32,439
(6,516)
1,172
(5,344)
27,095
(7,492)
19,603
65,148
1,587
(26,541)
(11,915)
28,279
(13,525)
1,272
(12,253)
16,026
(4,498)
11,528
77,088
65
(27,760)
(16,954)
32,439
(6,516)
1,172
(5,344)
27,095
(7,492)
19,603
65,148
1,587
(26,541)
(11,915)
28,279
(13,525)
1,272
(12,253)
16,026
(4,498)
11,528
1,875
(3,387)
994
(1,633)
(2,249)
104
(270)
(270)
19,333
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
(2,681)
8,847
(1,208)
60
(154)
(154)
19,449
(1,386)
845
(2,174)
(2,174)
9,354
Basic and diluted earnings per share (cents)
20
13.40
10.21
13.40
10.21
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
I PAGE 49
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 JULY 2014
Share
Capital
Employee
Benefits
Reserve
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
Notes
$’000
$’000
$’000
Group
Equity as at 1 August 2012
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2013
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Employee benefits reserve
20
20
21
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2014
103,648
-
-
-
-
-
20
20
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
172,548
-
-
-
-
-
-
(301)
-
(301)
172,247
848
-
(3,387)
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
-
-
-
$’000
8,008
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$’000
(26,213)
11,528
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
equity
$’000
86,291
11,528
(3,387)
(337)
1,043
(2,681)
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
(1,833)
8,008
(14,685)
164,038
-
1,875
(2,249)
104
(270)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19,603
19,603
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,875
(2,249)
104
(270)
-
(301)
60
(241)
(2,103)
8,008
4,918
183,130
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60
60
60
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
PAGE 50 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 JULY 2014
Parent
Equity as at 1 August 2012
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Issue of new shares
Share issue costs
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2013
Profit or loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Effective portion of changes in fair value of
cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total other comprehensive income
Share issue costs
Employee benefits reserve
Total contributions by and distributions
to owners
Equity as at 31 July 2014
Share
Capital
Employee
Benefits
Reserve
Hedging
reserves
Revaluation
reserve
Retained
earnings
Total
equity
Notes
$’000
$’000
$’000
103,648
-
-
-
-
-
20
20
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
172,548
-
-
-
-
-
20
21
(301)
-
(301)
172,247
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60
60
60
848
-
(1,633)
(1,386)
845
(2,174)
-
-
-
$’000
8,008
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$’000
$’000
(26,213)
11,528
86,291
11,528
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,633)
(1,386)
845
(2,174)
75,000
(6,100)
68,900
(1,326)
8,008
(14,685)
164,545
-
994
(1,208)
60
(154)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19,603
19,603
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
994
(1,208)
60
(154)
(301)
60
(241)
(1,480)
8,008
4,918
183,753
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
I PAGE 51
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 JULY 2014
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Goods and services tax refundable
Income accruals and prepayments
Inventories
Derivative financial instruments
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Investments in subsidiary
Other investments
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Working capital facility
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Trade finance facility
Advances from subsidiary
Derivative financial instruments
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Advances from subsidiary
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity
Share capital
Reserves
Retained earnings/(deficit)
Total equity attributable to equity holders
of the Company
Total equity and liabilities
Notes
10
11
12
25
14
15
29
13
25
18
16
18
17
25
18
19
25
17
20
22
Group
2014
$’000
2,393
89,046
8,880
786
71,262
1,632
2013
$’000
2,365
59,134
2,917
570
65,025
1,138
Parent
2014
$’000
2,393
89,046
8,880
786
71,262
1,595
2013
$’000
31,487
59,134
2,917
570
65,025
1,138
173,999
131,149
173,962
160,271
298,186
210,780
298,186
4,589
4,052
4,589
210,780
4,052
-
70
42
302,887
476,886
12,500
116,730
2,618
50,613
-
2,916
-
-
86
1
70
-
1
-
-
214,918
346,067
302,846
476,808
214,833
375,104
33,079
57,535
-
46,924
-
4,379
-
-
116,007
57,421
2,618
50,613
13,660
2,443
-
46,924
63,926
2,980
185,377
141,917
185,341
171,251
-
-
16,767
11,953
91,376
16,525
478
-
108,379
293,756
27,917
11,755
440
-
40,112
182,029
-
90,947
107,714
293,055
172,247
172,548
172,247
5,965
4,918
183,130
476,886
6,175
(14,685)
164,038
346,067
6,588
4,918
183,753
476,808
-
27,355
39,308
210,559
172,548
6,682
(14,685)
164,545
375,104
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
PAGE 52 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 JULY 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers
Cash paid for milk purchased
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
Notes
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
568,266
382,600
569,307
381,552
(362,551)
(289,268)
(362,551)
(289,268)
Cash paid to other creditors and employees
(141,077)
(141,231)
(141,686)
(141,345)
Goods and services tax refunds / (payments)
Income tax refunds
(5,963)
-
575
229
(5,963)
-
575
229
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from operating activities
23
58,675
(47,095)
59,107
(48,257)
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of intangible assets
Purchases of available-for-sale financial assets
130
(95,876)
133
1,272
(6,437)
-
130
(95,876)
133
(1,508)
(1,607)
(1,508)
(70)
-
(70)
1,272
(7,989)
-
(55)
-
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from investing activities
(97,191)
(6,772)
(97,191)
(6,772)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of shares (net)
Repayments of borrowings
Receipt of borrowings
Net movement in working capital and trade finance facilities
Interest paid
Movement in advances from subsidiary
Net cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning
of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
10
(301)
68,900
(301)
(17,699)
(64,521)
(89,213)
80,638
(16,890)
(7,204)
-
38,544
28
2,365
2,393
670
64,042
(13,525)
-
55,566
1,699
28,596
63,786
(7,204)
13,326
8,990
(29,094)
666
2,365
31,487
2,393
68,900
(94,782)
670
33,307
(13,525)
91,280
85,850
30,821
666
31,487
The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.
I PAGE 53
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
1 REPORTING ENTITY
Synlait Milk Limited (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiary
(together ‘the Group’) is domiciled in New Zealand, registered
under the Companies Act 1993 and listed on the New Zealand
Stock Exchange, The Company is an issuer for the purposes of
the Financial Reporting Act 1993 and its financial statements
comply with that Act.
Synlait Milk Limited is primarily involved in the manufacture
and sale of dairy products.
The Company is a limited liability company incorporated and
domiciled in New Zealand. The address of its registered office
is 1028 Heslerton Road, Rakaia, RD 13, New Zealand.
2 BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been
prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice in New Zealand (‘NZ GAAP’). They comply with
New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting
Standards (‘NZ IFRS’) and other applicable Financial
Reporting Standards, as applicable for profit-oriented entities.
The consolidated financial statements also comply with
International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’).
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the
directors on 19 September 2014.
Basis of Measurement
These financial statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis except for the following:
- Revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets
- Financial assets and liabilities (including derivative
instruments) at fair value
- Land, buildings, plant and equipment
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with NZ
IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates.
It also requires management to exercise its judgement in
the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The
areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
financial statements, are disclosed in note 4.
(a) Principles of consolidation
The Group’s financial statements consolidate the financial
statements of the Company and its subsidiary. A subsidiary
is a controlled entity over which the Group has power, is
exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement
with the entity, and has the ability to use its power to affect
its returns. In June 2013 a subsidiary, Synlait Milk Finance
Limited, was set up primarily for holding all banking facilities
for the Group and related interest rate swaps. Funds are
loaned to Synlait Milk Limited and interest is charged at
market rates.
(b) Segment reporting
The Group operates in one industry, being the manufacture
and sale of dairy products. The Board makes resource
allocation decisions based on expected cash flows and results
of the Group’s operations as a whole and the Group therefore
has one segment.
Although the Group sells to many different countries, for
management reporting purposes the Group operates in one
principal geographical area being New Zealand.
(c) New Accounting Policy ‑ Share based payments
Employees (including Senior Management) of the Group
may receive remuneration in the form of share-based
payment transactions, whereby employees render services as
consideration for equity instruments (equity settled). The cost
of equity settled transactions with employees are measured by
reference to the grant date fair value of the equity instruments
granted. The fair value of equity settled options are recognised
as an expense, together with a corresponding increase to
the employee benefits reserve within equity, over the vesting
period in which the performance and/or service conditions
are fulfilled. The total amount to be expensed is based on the
fair value of each option along with the best estimate of the
number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest which
includes an assessment of performance and service conditions.
The expense or credit for a period represents the movement in
cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of
that period.
(d) Reclassified balances
Where appropriate, prior year comparatives have been
regrouped to conform with the current year classification.
Reclassifications are summarised below.
PAGE 54 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
The Group has changed the classification of cashflows from
the trade finance and working capital facilities within the
Statement of Cash Flows resulting in a movement of amounts
between operating and financing activities. As a result, the
comparative amounts have changed in the Statement of Cash
Flows:
- 31 July 2013 receipts from customers decreased by
$33,307,000;
- 31 July 2013 repayments of borrowings increased by
$30,735,000; and
- 31 July 2013 net movement in working capital and trade
finance facilities increased by $64,042,000.
Mitsui & Co NZ is Synlait Milk Limited’s export sales agent.
Under this agreement Mitsui pays Synlait Milk the amounts
invoiced to export customers within an agreed period after
shipment of products. The amounts received from Mitsui (the
trade finance facility) were previously included in receipts from
customers but have been reclassified to be a financing activity.
The Group has reclassified these amounts as it considers the
Mitsui & Co NZ trade finance facility to be a financing activity
in nature.
The working capital facility is drawn and repaid on a weekly
basis and can be considered analogous to an overdraft facility,
the cashflows for which are considered financing in nature.
Given the short term nature of the transactions, it is more
appropriate to disclose the movements on a net basis as
opposed to the total draw downs and total repayments.
These changes have no impact on the statements of
comprehensive income or financial position.
The Group has also changed the classification of some
employee costs, depreciation and repairs and maintenance
expenditure within the profit and loss component of the
Statement of Comprehensive Income to better reflect actual
performance resulting in a movement between sales and
distribution expenses and administrative and operating
expenses. As a result, the comparative amounts have changed
in the Statement of Comprehensive Income:
- 31 July 2013 sales and distribution expenses increased by
$3,063,000; and
- 31 July 2013 administrative and operating expenses
decreased by $3,063,000.
These changes have no impact on the statements of financial
position or cash flows.
3 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
(a) Foreign currency translation
(i) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of the Group
are measured using the currency of the primary economic
environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional
currency’). The financial statements are presented in New
Zealand Dollars ($), which is the Group’s functional currency
and are rounded to the nearest thousand ($000).
(ii) Transactions and balances
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the
functional currency at the exchange rates at the dates of the
transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the
functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.
(b) Revenue recognition
(i) Sales of goods
Revenue from the sale of goods is measured at the fair value
of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns,
discounts and allowances. Revenue is recognised when
the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is
probable, and the associated costs and possible return of
goods can be estimated reliably.
Transfers of risks and rewards vary depending on the
individual terms of the contract of sale.
(ii) Interest income
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest
method. When a loan or receivable is impaired, the Group
reduces the carrying amount to its recoverable amount, being
the estimated future cash flow discounted at the original
effective interest rate of the instrument, and continues
unwinding the discount as interest income. Interest income on
impaired loans and receivables is recognised using the original
effective interest rate.
(c) Government grants
Grants from the government are recognised at their fair
value where there is a reasonable assurance that the grant
will be received and the Group will comply with all attached
conditions.
Government grants relating to costs are deferred and
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income over the
period necessary to match them with the costs that they are
intended to compensate.
I PAGE 55
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(d) Research and development
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the
prospect of obtaining new scientific or technical knowledge
and understanding, is recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income as an expense when it is incurred.
(e) Income tax
The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred
tax. Tax is recognised in the profit and loss component of the
statement of comprehensive income, except to the extent that
it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income
or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in
other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income
for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted
at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in
respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method,
providing for temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax is not recognised for the revaluation of land to the
extent that any revaluation is unlikely to affect the tax base
of the asset. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are
expected to be applied to the temporary differences when
they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or
substantively enacted by the reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profits will be available against
which the temporary difference can be utilised. Deferred tax
assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced
to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax
benefit will be realised.
Tax consolidation group
Synlait Milk Limited and its wholly-owned New Zealand
controlled entities form a tax consolidation group.
(f) Goods and Services Tax (GST)
The profit and loss component of the statements of
comprehensive income have been prepared so that all
components are stated exclusive of GST. All items in the
financial position are stated net of GST, with the exception of
receivables and payables, which include GST invoiced.
(g) Leases
Leases on terms where the Group assumes substantially all
the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance
leases. Upon initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at
an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present
value of the minimum lease payments with a corresponding
liability to the lessor included in the statement of financial
position as a finance lease obligation. Subsequent to initial
recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the
accounting policy applicable to that asset. Lease payments
are apportioned between finance charges and reduction in the
lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on
the remaining balance of the liability.
Other leases are operating leases and the leased assets are
not recognised on the Group’s statement of financial position.
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense
on a straight line basis over the lease term, except where
another systematic basis is more representative of the time
pattern over which economic benefits from leased assets are
consumed.
(h) Impairment of non‑financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets are
reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is
any indication of impairment.
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of
an asset or its cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable
amount. A cash generating unit is the smallest identifiable
asset group that generates cash flows that are largely
independent from other assets and groups. Impairment losses
are first recognized as a deduction against revaluation reserves
and then recognised in the profit or loss component of the
statement of comprehensive income once those reserves have
been exhausted.
Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating
units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying
amount of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro
rata basis.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit
is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows
are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value
of money and the risks specific to the asset.
PAGE 56 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed
at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has
decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed
if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine
the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only
to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed
the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of
depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been
recognised.
(i) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, call
deposits, and working capital facilities that are repayable
on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash
management.
(j) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for
merchandise sold or services performed in the ordinary course
of business. If collection is expected in one year or less (or
in the normal operating cycle of the business if longer), they
are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as
non-current assets.
The recoverable amount of the Group’s receivables which are
carried at amortised cost is calculated as the present value
of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original
effective interest rate (i.e. the effective interest rate computed
at initial recognition of these financial assets). Receivables
with a short duration are not discounted.
Impairment losses on an individual basis are determined by an
evaluation of the exposures on an instrument by instrument
basis. All individual instruments that are considered significant
are subject to this approach.
For trade receivables which are not significant on an individual
basis, impairment is assessed on a portfolio basis based
on numbers of days overdue, and taking into account the
historical loss experienced in portfolios with a similar amount
of days overdue.
(k) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable
value. Cost is comprised of direct materials and where
applicable, direct labour and an appropriate proportion of
variable and fixed overhead expenditure, the latter being
allocated on the basis of normal operating capacity. Cost is
determined on a weighted average basis and in the case of
manufactured goods, includes direct materials, labour and
production overheads. Net realisable value is the estimated
selling price in the ordinary course of business less the
estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs
necessary to make the sale.
Investments in subsidiaries
(l)
Investments in subsidiaries in the Parent financial statements
are stated at cost less impairment.
(m) Investments and other financial assets
Classification
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following
categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and
receivables, and available for sale. The classification depends
on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired.
Management determines the classification of its financial
assets at initial recognition.
(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial
assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this
category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the
short term. Derivatives are also categorised as held for trading
unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category
are classified as current assets if expected to be settled within
12 months, otherwise they are classified as non-current.
(ii) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets
with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in
an active market. They are included in current assets, except
for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the
reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets.
The Group’s loans and receivables comprise ‘trade and other
receivables’ and ‘cash and cash equivalents’ in the statement
of financial position (notes (i) and (j)).
(iii) Available for sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are
either designated in this category or not classified in any of the
other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless
the investment matures or management intends to dispose of it
within 12 months of the end of the reporting period.
Recognition and measurement
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised
on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits
to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially
recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial
assets not classified at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are
initially recognised at fair value, and transaction costs are
expensed in the profit and loss component of the statement
of comprehensive income. Financial assets are derecognised
when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments
have expired or have been transferred and the Group has
transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.
I PAGE 57
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair
value. Loans and receivables are subsequently carried at
amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Changes in the fair value of monetary and non-monetary
securities classified as available for sale are recognised in other
comprehensive income.
When securities classified as available for sale are sold or
impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments recognised
in equity are included in the profit and loss component of the
statement of comprehensive income as ‘gains and losses from
investment securities’.
Interest on available-for-sale securities calculated using the
effective interest method is recognised in the profit and loss
component of the statement of comprehensive income as
part of finance income. Dividends on available-for-sale equity
instruments are recognised in the profit and loss component
of the statement of comprehensive income as part of other
income when the Group’s right to receive payments is
established.
Offsetting financial instruments
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount
reported in the statement of financial position when there is a
legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and
there is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset
and settle the liability simultaneously.
Impairment of financial assets
(i) Assets carried at amortised cost
The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period
whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or
group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a
group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses
are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment
as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial
recognition of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event
(or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows
of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be
reliably estimated.
Evidence of impairment may include indications that the
debtors or a group of debtors is experiencing significant
financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or
principal payments, the probability that they will enter
bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation, and where
observable data indicate that there is a measurable decrease in
the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or
economic conditions that correlate with defaults.
For the loans and receivables category, the amount of the
loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s
carrying amount and the present value of estimated future
cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been
incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective
interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced and
the amount of the loss is recognised in the profit and loss
component of the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income. If a loan or held-to-maturity investment has a variable
interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment
loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the
contract. As a practical expedient, the Group may measure
impairment on the basis of an instrument’s fair value using an
observable market price.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss
decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an
event occurring after the impairment was recognised (such as
an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), the reversal of
the previously recognised impairment loss is recognised in the
profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive
income.
(ii) Assets classified as available for sale
The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period
whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a
group of financial assets is impaired. For debt securities, the
Group uses the criteria referred to in (i) above. In the case of
equity investments classified as available for sale, a significant
or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below
its cost is also evidence that the assets are impaired. If any
such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets,
the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between
the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any
impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised
in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in
profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive
income. If, in a subsequent period, the fair value of a debt
instrument classified as available for sale increases and the
increase can be objectively related to an event occurring
after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss,
the impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income.
PAGE 58 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(n) Derivatives
The Group enters into a variety of derivative financial
instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign
exchange rate risk, including forward exchange contracts and
interest rate swaps.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date
a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently
remeasured to their fair value at each balance date. The
resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately
unless the derivative is designated as effective as a hedging
instrument, in which event the timing of the recognition in
profit or loss depends on the nature of the hedge relationship.
Hedges of highly probable forecast transactions or hedges of
foreign currency risk of firm commitments are designated as
cash flow hedges by the Group.
The full fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as a
non-current asset or liability when the remaining hedged
item is more than 12 months, and as a current asset or liability
when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than
12 months. Trading derivatives are classified as a current asset
or liability.
(i) Hedge accounting
The Group designates certain hedging instruments in respect
of foreign currency risk as cash flow hedges. Hedges of foreign
currency exchange risk on firm commitments are accounted
for as cash flow hedges.
At the inception of the hedge relationship, the Group
documents the relationship between the hedging instrument
and the hedged item, along with its risk management
objectives and its strategy for undertaking various hedge
transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and
on an ongoing basis, the Group documents whether the
hedging instrument that is used in a hedging relationship is
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash
flows of the hedged item.
(ii) Cash flow hedge
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives
that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are
recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated
as a separate component of equity in the hedging reserve. The
gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised
immediately in profit or loss, and is included in Finance costs.
Amounts recognised in the hedging reserve are classified from
equity to profit or loss (as a reclassification adjustment) in the
periods when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss, in
the same line as the recognised hedged item.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes
the hedging relationships, the hedging instrument expires
or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer qualifies as
hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain or loss recognised
in the hedging reserve at that time remains in equity and
is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately
recognised in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no
longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was
recognised in the hedging reserve is immediately recorded in
profit or loss.
(iii) Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge
accounting. Changes in the fair value of any derivative
instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting are
recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive
income.
(o) Fair value estimation
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities
must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for
disclosure purposes.
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active
markets (such as publicly traded derivatives, and trading
and available-for-sale securities) is based on quoted market
prices at the balance date. The quoted market price used for
financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price; the
appropriate quoted market price for financial liabilities is the
current ask price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in
an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives)
is determined using valuation techniques. The Group use a
variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based
on market conditions existing at each balance date. Other
techniques, such as estimated discounted cash flows, are used
to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.
I PAGE 59
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(p) Property, plant and equipment
Recognition and measurement
Property, plant and equipment are initially measured at cost
less accumulated depreciation.
Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the
acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets
includes the cost of materials and direct labour, any other costs
directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition
for its intended use, and the costs of dismantling and removing
the items and restoring the site on which they are located.
When a self-constructed asset meets the definition of a
qualifying asset under NZ IAS 23 ‘Borrowing Costs”, borrowing
costs directly attributable to the construction of the asset are
capitalised until such a time as the asset is substantially ready
for its intended use or sale.
When major components of an item of property, plant and
equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for
as separate items of property, plant and equipment.
Revaluations
Land, buildings and plant and equipment are carried at fair
value. Any increase in the value of land, buildings, plant and
equipment is recognised in other comprehensive income and
presented in the revaluation reserve in equity unless it offsets
a previous decrease in value recognised in the profit or loss, in
which case it is recognised in the profit or loss. A decrease in
value is recognised in the profit or loss where it exceeds the
increase previously recognised in equity.
Fair value estimation
The fair valuation of land is undertaken on a cyclical basis, not
exceeding three years, by an independent registered valuer.
The valuation considered the highest and best use of the
land, which is the current use, and was based on comparable
sales for rural blocks within the locality on a per hectare
basis. The fair valuation of buildings, plant and equipment
is undertaken on a cyclical basis, not exceeding three years,
by an independent registered valuer. As the assets are
specialized in nature, there is no comparable market data from
which to derive a market based valuation. The valuation has
consequently been prepared on a depreciated replacement
cost basis and assumes that the current use of these assets is
the best and highest use. The replacement cost was based on
a volume basis for the dryers and an area basis for all
other facilities.
Subsequent costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and
equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item
if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied
within the part will flow to the Group and its cost can be
measured reliably. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of
property, plant and equipment are recognised in profit or loss
as incurred.
Depreciation
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is recognised in
profit or loss on a straight line basis over the estimated useful
lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment.
Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease
term and their useful lives. Land is not depreciated.
Capital work in progress is not depreciated. The total cost of
this work is transferred to the relevant asset category on the
completion of the project and then depreciated.
The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative
periods are as follows:
- Buildings
- Plant and equipment
- Fixtures and fittings
10 - 50 years
3 - 33 years
2 - 14 years
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are
reassessed at the reporting date.
(q) Intangible assets
(i) Patents, trademarks and other rights
Separately acquired patents and trademarks are shown at
historical cost. Patents and trademarks acquired in a business
combination are recognised at fair value at the acquisition
date. Patents and trademarks have a finite useful life and are
carried at cost less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is
calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost
of patents and trademarks over their estimated useful lives of
10 years.
(ii) Computer software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the
basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the
specific software. These costs are amortised on a straight line
basis over their estimated useful lives of three to ten years.
Costs associated with maintaining computer software
programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred.
Development costs that are directly attributable to the design
PAGE 60 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
and testing of identifiable and unique software products
controlled by the Group are recognised as intangible assets.
(r) Trade and other payables
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services
that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business
from suppliers. Accounts payable are classified as current
liabilities if payment is due within one year or less (or in the
normal operating cycle of the business if longer). If not, they
are presented as non-current liabilities.
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair
value plus any directly attributable transaction costs and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method.
(s) Interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing liabilities are recognised initially at fair
value, net of transaction costs incurred. Interest bearing
liabilities are subsequently carried at amortised cost; any
difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs)
and the redemption value is recognised in the profit and
loss component of the statement of comprehensive income
over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest
method.
(t) Share Capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new
ordinary shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction
from the proceeds.
Where any Group company purchases the Company’s equity
share capital (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including
any directly attributable incremental costs is deducted from
equity attributable to the Company’s equity holders until the
shares are cancelled or reissued. Where such ordinary shares
are subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net of
any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the
related income tax effects, is included in equity attributable to
the Company’s equity holders.
(u) Earnings per share
The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by
dividing the profit or loss attributable to shareholders by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or
loss attributable to shareholders and the number of shares
outstanding to include the effects of all potential dilutive shares.
(v) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition,
construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets
that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for
their intended use, are added to the cost of those assets, until
such time as the assets are substantially ready for use.
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the
period in which they are incurred.
(w) Standards, amendments and interpretations to
existing standards that are not yet effective
Certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to
existing standards have been published that are mandatory for
the Group’s accounting periods beginning on or after 1 August
2014 or later periods but which the Group has not
early adopted:
- NZ IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments: Classification and
measurement’ (effective 1 January 2018). NZ IFRS 9
amends the requirements related to the classification and
measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities.
The Group is considering adopting this standard in the
2015 financial year and is currently assessing the impact of
adoption.
- NZ IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’
(effective 1 January 2017). NZ IFRS 15 will be effective from
the Group’s 2018 financial year. The impact of this standard
has not yet been determined.
There are no other standards that are not yet effective and
that are expected to have a material impact on the entity in
the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable
future transactions.
I PAGE 61
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(x) Standards, amendments, and interpretations
effective in 2014
inventory, the industry milk price and the fair value of land,
building and plant and equipment.
- NZ IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated financial statements’ (effective 1
January 2013). NZ IFRS 10 develops a single consolidation
model applicable to all investees. The standard provides
that an investor consolidates an investee when it has
power, exposure to variability in returns, and a linkage
between the two. There is no impact of the standard on the
financial statements.
- NZ IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities’
(effective 1 January 2013). This standard replaces existing
requirements for disclosure of subsidiaries and joint
ventures (now joint arrangements), and makes limited
amendments in relation to associates. There is no impact on
the recognition or measurement of the financial statements
from the change in standard.
- NZ IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ (effective 1 January
2013). The Group has applied NZ IFRS 13 for the first time
in the current year. NZ IFRS 13 establishes a single source
of guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures
about fair value measurements. NZ IFRS 13 defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
in the principal (or most advantageous) market at the
measurement date under current market conditions.
Fair value under NZ IFRS 13 is an exit price regardless of
whether that price is directly observable or estimated using
another valuation technique.
- Other than additional disclosures, the application of NZ
IFRS 13 has not had any material impact on the amounts
recognised in these financial statements.
4 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND
JUDGEMENTS
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with NZ IFRS requires management to make
judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of accounting policies and the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may
differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an on-going
basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in
the period in which the estimate is revised and in any future
periods affected.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty relate to assessment of
impairment of inventory, standard costs used for measuring
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable
value. Estimates are required in relation to net realisable value
which is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling
expenses. Reviewing the net realisable values is carried out by
management on a periodic basis and any reduction to cost is
provided by way of stock provision.
The use of a standard cost methodology for inventory requires
management estimation in determining the Monthly Milk
Price to be applied which form a key component of the product
standard cost.
The estimate of the industry milk price is a key assumption
applied by management in the financial statements. This
industry price is used for milk purchased or received from
other processors during the year.
Land, buildings and plant and equipment are recognised at fair
value as described in note 14 (a).
5 SEGMENT INFORMATION
(a) Description of segments
The Company and Group operate in one industry, being the
manufacture and sale of milk powder and milk powder related
products. The Board makes resource allocation decisions
based on expected cash flows and results of the Company’s
operations as a whole and the Group therefore has one
segment.
Although the Group sell to many different countries, for
management reporting purposes the Company and Group
operate in one principal geographical area being New Zealand.
Revenues of approximately 52% (2013: 56%) are derived from
the top three external customers.
The proportion of sales volumes by geographical area is
summarised below:
China
Rest of Asia
Africa
Rest of world
2014
26%
32%
23%
19%
100%
2013
19%
34%
23%
24%
100%
PAGE 62 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
6 REVENUE
Dairy products
Insurance proceeds
Other sundry income
Management fees
7 EXPENSES
The following items of expenditure are included
in cost of sales
Depreciation and amortisation
Employee benefit expense
Repairs and maintenance
The following items of expenditure are included
in sales and distribution expenses
Depreciation and amortisation
Donations
Research and development
Rent expense
Repairs and maintenance
Employee benefit expense
The following items of expenditure are included
in administrative and operating expenses
Depreciation
Repairs and maintenance
Employee benefit expense
Defined benefit contributions - Kiwisaver
Directors fees
Share based payments expense (note 21)
Group
Year ended
2014
$’000
Parent
Year ended
2013
$’000
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
600,518
420,010
600,518
420,010
-
32
33
1,304
245
38
-
32
33
1,304
245
38
600,583
421,597
600,583
421,597
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
9,406
9,245
2,774
879
14
326
1,676
332
3,953
1,092
41
7,561
279
440
60
2013
$’000
8,966
6,589
3,109
397
54
312
1,355
332
2,666
819
31
4,344
138
346
-
2014
$’000
9,405
9,245
2,774
879
14
326
1,676
332
3,953
1,092
41
7,561
279
440
60
2013
$’000
8,966
6,589
3,109
397
54
312
1,355
332
2,666
819
31
4,344
138
346
-
I PAGE 63
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Deloitte services included in administrative
and operating expenses and share capital
Audit
IPO
Taxation advice
Financial modelling
Accounting advice and other consulting
Total
8 FINANCE INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest income on bank deposits
Settlement of ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
Total finance income
Interest and facility fees
Capitalised borrowing costs
Settlement of ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
Total finance costs
Total finance costs
9 INCOME TAX
(a) Income tax expense
Current tax:
Current tax on profits for the year
Total current tax
Deferred tax:
Temporary differences
Tax losses utilised
Adjustment to prior year tax losses brought forward
Other prior year adjustments
Total deferred tax (note 19)
Income tax (expense) / benefit
PAGE 64 I
127
-
69
205
95
496
105
473
121
215
40
954
127
-
69
205
95
496
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
130
1,042
1,172
(8,768)
2,252
-
(6,516)
(5,344)
2013
$’000
103
1,169
1,272
(12,811)
-
(714)
(13,525)
(12,253)
2014
$’000
130
1,042
1,172
(8,768)
2,252
-
(6,516)
(5,344)
105
473
121
215
40
954
2013
$’000
103
1,169
1,272
(12,811)
-
(714)
(13,525)
(12,253)
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
(2,618)
(2,618)
(693)
(4,298)
(84)
201
(4,874)
(7,492)
-
-
(4,498)
-
-
-
(4,498)
(4,498)
(2,618)
(2,618)
(693)
(4,298)
(84)
201
(4,874)
(7,492)
-
-
(4,498)
-
-
-
(4,498)
(4,498)
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate
Profit before income tax
Income tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate - 28%
Other non deductible costs
Adjustment to prior year tax losses brought forward
Other prior year adjustments
Total prior period adjustments
Income tax expense
(c) Imputation credits
Imputation credits available directly and indirectly
to the shareholders of the parent company
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
27,095
(7,587)
(22)
(7,609)
(84)
201
117
2013
$’000
16,026
(4,487)
(11)
(4,498)
-
-
-
2014
$’000
27,095
(7,587)
(22)
(7,609)
(84)
201
117
2013
$’000
16,026
(4,487)
(11)
(4,498)
-
-
-
(7,492)
(4,498)
(7,492)
(4,498)
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
2,618
-
2,618
-
(d) Income tax recognised in other comprehensive income
The tax (charge)/credit relating to components of other comprehensive income is as follows:
Group
31 July 2014
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
31 July 2013
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
Parent
31 July 2014
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
31 July 2013
Cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income
Tax
(expense)/
benefit
Before tax
After tax
$’000
$’000
$’000
(373)
(373)
(3,724)
(3,724)
(215)
(215)
(3,019)
(3,019)
104
104
1,043
1,043
60
60
845
845
(269)
(269)
(2,681)
(2,681)
(155)
(155)
(2,174)
(2,174)
I PAGE 65
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
10 CURRENT ASSETS ‑ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents
Group
Parent
2014
$’000
2,393
2013
$’000
2,365
2014
$’000
2,393
2013
$’000
31,487
(a) Risk exposure
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is discussed in note 24(a,ii). The maximum exposure to credit risk at the end of the
reporting period is the carrying amount.
(b) Fair value
The carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents equals their fair value.
11 CURRENT ASSETS ‑ TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Net trade receivables
Trade receivables
Provision for doubtful receivables
Other receivables
Total receivables
Group
2014
$’000
88,585
(100)
88,485
561
2013
$’000
59,090
-
59,090
44
Parent
2014
$’000
88,585
(100)
88,485
561
2013
$’000
59,090
-
59,090
44
89,046
59,134
89,046
59,134
The increase in trade receivables is predominantly due to the increased sales volumes in July 2014 compared to July 2013.
(a) Impaired receivables
As of 31 July 2014, trade receivables of $9.7 m were overdue but not impaired (2013: $3.5 m). These relate to a number of
independent customers for whom there is no recent history of default. The majority has since been collected but $0.9 m remains
unpaid which is expected to be collected in the 2015 financial year.
The ageing analysis of these overdue trade receivables is as follows:
Group
Parent
2014
$’000
7,079
1,508
1,142
9,729
2013
$’000
391
3,093
-
3,484
2014
$’000
7,079
1,508
1,142
9,729
2013
$’000
391
3,093
-
3,484
0 to 30 days
30 to 60 days
Over 60 days
Total trade receivables
PAGE 66 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(b) Bad and doubtful trade receivables
The Company and Group have recognised a loss of $100,000 (2013: $nil) in respect of bad and doubtful trade receivables during the
year ended 31 July 2014.
(c) Trade and other receivables
Accounts receivable are amounts incurred in the normal course of business.
Receivables denominated in other currencies other than the functional currency comprise NZ$81.2 m (2013: $47.3 m) of USD and
Euro denominated trade receivables.
12 CURRENT ASSETS ‑ INVENTORIES
Raw materials at cost
Finished goods at cost
Finished goods at net realisable value
Total inventories
Group
Parent
2014
$’000
15,348
29,422
26,492
71,262
2013
$’000
16,047
44,160
4,818
65,025
2014
$’000
15,348
29,422
26,492
71,262
2013
$’000
16,047
44,160
4,818
65,025
Inventories recognised at net realisable value has increased significantly from 2013 as a result of some manufactured infant formula
not being able to be sold into the China market as a result of the change in Chinese government regulations. The total provision as
at reporting date was $9.9m (2013 $3.1m) with $7.5m relating to infant formula.
13 NON‑CURRENT ASSETS ‑ OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
Unlisted securities
Equity securities
Group
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
Parent
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
70
-
70
-
In July 2014, Primary Collaboration New Zealand Limited was incorporated with 6,000 shares issued at a par value of $10 each.
Synlait Milk Limited has subscribed to 1,000 shares and has fully paid this share capital. An additional capital contribution was
made by all shareholders in proportion to their shareholding in July 2014 with Synlait Milk Limited contributing $60,000.
I PAGE 67
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
14 NON‑CURRENT ASSETS ‑ PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Group and Parent
Cost or valuation
Cost
Revaluation
Balance at 1 August 2012
Additions
Reclassification / transfer
Disposals
Land
Buildings
Plant and
equipment
Fixtures
and fittings
Capital
work in
progress
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Total
$’000
3,042
170
3,212
-
5
-
31,459
1,761
183,486
10,272
2,396
-
33,220
193,758
2,396
-
-
-
-
3,365
(195)
-
13
-
4,317
224,700
-
12,203
4,317
6,592
(3,383)
236,903
6,592
-
-
(195)
Balance at 31 July 2013
3,217
33,220
196,928
2,409
7,526
243,300
-
-
-
-
27,894
-
-
44,893
(287)
3,217
61,114
241,534
3,224
180
3,404
1,020
90
-
4,514
1,208
90
-
17,266
967
18,233
7,851
509
(40)
26,553
8,266
509
(70)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
98,126
98,126
1,099
(74)
3,434
1,167
-
1,167
286
-
-
1,453
430
-
(74)
(73,886)
-
-
(361)
31,766
341,065
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21,657
1,147
22,804
9,157
599
(40)
32,520
9,904
599
(144)
42,879
5,812
35,258
1,809
3,217
3,217
28,706
55,302
170,375
206,276
956
1,625
7,526
210,780
31,766
298,186
Additions
Reclassification / transfer
Disposals
Balance at 31 July 2014
Accumulated depreciation
Cost
Revaluation
Balance at 1 August 2012
Depreciation
Revaluation depreciation
Disposals
Balance at 31 July 2013
Depreciation
Revaluation depreciation
Disposals
Balance at 31 July 2014
Carrying amounts
At 31 July 2013
At 31 July 2014
PAGE 68 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(a) Valuations of land and buildings
Land, buildings, and plant and equipment were independently valued as at 31 July 2012 by Jones Lang LaSalle using either the
depreciated replacement cost method (for buildings and plant and equipment) or market based valuation (for land). The policy in
respect of revaluations is described in note 3(p).
For buildings, plant and equipment the depreciated replacement cost method represents a tier 3 valuation under the fair value
hierarchy. The depreciated replacement cost is defined as the gross current replacement cost reduced by factors providing for age,
physical depreciation and technical and functional obsolescence taking in to account the assets’ total estimated useful life and
anticipated residual value (if any). The depreciated replacement cost includes all the costs to purchase, deliver and install the asset.
The key sensitivity of the depreciated replacement cost valuation relates to the estimated useful lives of the assets being valued. As
there are a large number of assets all with varying estimated useful lives, it is not practical to determine a number sensitivity to this
input factor.
The valuation for land, which is a tier 2 valuation under the fair value hierarchy, has been completed by reference to transactions
which have been observed in the market. The fair value determined in the valuation assumes that there is a willing, but not
anxious buyer and seller; a reasonable period within which to negotiate the sale, having regard to the nature and situation of
the land and the state of the market for land of the same kind; no account is taken of the value of other advantages or benefit
additional to market value to the buyer incidental to ownership of the property being valued; and the Group has sufficient
resources to negotiate an agreement for the sale of the land. The key sensitivity to the market based valuation is the observable
market transactions on which the valuation is based. It is impractical to provide numerical sensitivities for such valuations.
Land, buildings, and plant and equipment was valued at $208.6m as at 31 July 2012. If the cost model had been used, the carrying
value of land, buildings and plant and equipment would have been $3.1m, $53.9m and $198.0m respectively, at reporting date.
Management has estimated that the valuation has not materially changed since 2012 and that depreciated replacement cost is a fair
estimate of current value. In accordance with policy, an independent valuation will be undertaken during the 2015 financial year.
(b) Impairment
During the period, property, plant and equipment have been examined for impairment. No indicators of impairment have been
identified and no material items of property, plant and equipment are considered to be impaired.
(c) Capital work in progress
Assets under construction includes capital expenditure projects, until they are commissioned and transferred to fixed assets.
Capital work in progress of $31.8 m at balance date is predominantly constituted of the project to date spend ($21.5 m) on the
construction of the third dryer.
(d) Capitalised borrowing costs
During the year, the Group has capitalised borrowing costs amounting to $2.3 m (2013: $nil) on qualifying assets. Interest has been
capitalised at the rate in which borrowing has been specifically drawn to fund the qualifying asset as disclosed in note 18.
I PAGE 69
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
15 NON‑CURRENT ASSETS ‑ INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Group and Parent
Year ended 31 July 2013
Opening net book value
Additions
Development costs recognised as an asset
Amortisation charge
Closing net book value
Year ended 31 July 2014
Opening net book value
Additions
Development costs recognised as an asset
Disposals
Amortisation charge
Closing net book value
Patents,
trademarks
and other
rights
Computer
software
$’000
$’000
Brand
$’000
Supplier
contracts
Intangibles
in progress
$’000
$’000
65
8
-
-
73
73
-
-
-
(39)
34
2,533
-
273
(336)
2,470
2,470
-
683
-
(754)
2,399
102
55
-
-
157
157
4
-
(97)
-
64
171
-
-
(90)
81
81
-
-
-
(81)
-
-
1,544
(273)
-
1,271
1,271
1,504
(683)
-
-
2,092
Intangibles in progress of $2.1 m at balance date is predominantly constituted of the project to date spend ($1.5 m) on the
development and implementation of sales and operational planning software.
16 TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Trade payables
Accrued expenses
Employee entitlements
Total trade and other payables
Group
Parent
2014
$’000
69,526
45,625
1,579
116,730
2013
$’000
31,671
24,199
1,665
57,535
2014
$’000
69,526
44,902
1,579
116,007
Total
$’000
2,871
1,607
-
(426)
4,052
4,052
1,508
-
(97)
(874)
4,589
2013
$’000
31,671
24,085
1,665
57,421
Payables denominated in other currencies other than the functional currency comprise NZ$0.5 m (2013: $2.8 m) of USD and AUD
denominated trade payables and accruals.
The large increase in payables and accruals from July 2013 has been driven by the increased milk price, of which final payments to
suppliers remain outstanding.
PAGE 70 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
17 ADVANCES FROM SUBSIDIARY
Current liabilities
Advances from Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Non current liabilities
Advances from Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Group
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
Parent
2014
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,660
13,660
90,947
90,947
2013
$’000
63,926
63,926
27,355
27,355
The term of the advances from subsidiary have been loaned on the same terms as the banking facilities. The interest rates used are
the market rates and therefore the carrying value of the advances represent fair value.
18 LOANS AND BORROWINGS
Current liabilities
Working capital facility
Trade finance facility
Non-current liabilities
Bank loans
Loan facility fees
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
12,500
50,613
63,113
91,535
(159)
91,376
2013
$’000
33,079
46,924
80,003
28,596
(679)
27,917
2014
$’000
-
50,613
50,613
-
-
-
2013
$’000
-
46,924
46,924
-
-
-
(a) Terms of loans and borrowings
The bank loans and working capital facility within Synlait Milk Limited are secured under the terms of the General Security Deed
dated 26 June 2013, by which all present and future property is secured to the ANZ Bank and Bank of New Zealand.
The Company facilities include:
- A secured revolving credit facility of $75m that matures on 31 July 2016
- A secured term facility of $135m that matures on 31 July 2017 to fund the construction of Dryer 3
- A secured working capital facility of $85m that matures on 31 October 2014 (Management are currently finalising the level of
this facility required during the 2015 financial year at which point this facility will be extended to October 2015)
- An unlimited and unsecured trade finance facility from Mitsui & Co. Limited that matures on 31 July 2015
I PAGE 71
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
The Group is subject to capital requirements imposed by its bank through covenants agreed as part of the lending facility
arrangements. The Group has met all externally imposed capital requirements for the twelve months ended 31 July 2014 and 31
July 2013.
Secured term loan facility (D3) - ANZ / BNZ
Secured revolving credit facility - ANZ / BNZ
Secured working capital facility - ANZ / BNZ
Trade finance facility - Mitsui & Co. Limited
Nominal
Year of
Carrying
Carrying
Interest rate %
maturity
amount 2014
amount 2013
5.04
4.82
4.83
1.41
2017
2016
2015
2015
16,678
74,857
12,500
50,613
-
27,917
33,079
46,924
The nominal interest rate is calculated by adding the BKBM rate (or Libor rate for Mitsui trade finance facility) and the marginal
rate. It excludes line fees and swap costs.
Group
2014
$’000
817
3,128
-
3,945
2013
$’000
713
278
4,382
5,373
Parent
2014
$’000
575
3,128
-
3,703
2013
$’000
515
278
4,382
5,175
(20,460)
(17,108)
(20,460)
(17,108)
(10)
(20,470)
(16,525)
(20)
(17,128)
(11,755)
(10)
(20,470)
(16,767)
(20)
(17,128)
(11,953)
Balance
1 Aug 2012
Recognised in
profit or loss
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
(8,302)
$’000
(3,348)
-
111
(1,259)
(4,496)
Recognised
in other
comprehen-
sive income
Balance
31 July 2013
$’000
$’000
-
(17,108)
1,043
-
-
713
258
4,382
1,043
(11,755)
19 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Assets
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total deferred tax assets
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
Other items
Total deferred tax liabilities
Total deferred tax
Movements - Group
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
PAGE 72 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Balance
1 Aug 2013
Recognised in
profit or loss
$’000
(17,108)
713
258
4,382
$’000
(3,352)
-
2,860
(4,382)
Recognised
in other
comprehen-
sive income
Balance
31 July 2014
$’000
$’000
-
104
-
-
(20,460)
817
3,118
-
(11,755)
(4,874)
104
(16,525)
Balance
1 Aug 2012
Recognised in
profit or loss
$’000
(13,760)
(330)
147
5,641
(8,302)
$’000
(3,348)
-
111
(1,259)
(4,496)
Balance
1 Aug 2013
Recognised in
profit or loss
$’000
(17,108)
515
258
4,382
(11,953)
$’000
(3,352)
-
2,860
(4,382)
(4,874)
Recognised
in other
comprehen-
sive income
$’000
-
845
-
-
Balance
31 July 2013
$’000
(17,108)
515
258
4,382
845
(11,953)
Recognised
in other
comprehen-
sive income
$’000
-
60
-
-
60
Balance
31 July 2014
$’000
(20,460)
575
3,118
-
(16,767)
2014
Shares
2013
Shares
2014
$’000
2013
$’000
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
Movements - Parent
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
Property, plant and equipment
Derivatives
Other items
Tax losses carried forward
Total
20 SHARE CAPITAL
(a) Share capital
Ordinary shares
On issue at beginning of period
146,341,197
51,022,858
172,548
103,648
Share split
Issue of shares
Share issue costs
-
-
-
61,227,429
34,090,910
-
-
-
(301)
-
75,000
(6,100)
146,341,197
146,341,197
172,247
172,548
The share split in 2013 was to ensure there was the required number of shares in Synlait Milk Limited prior to the IPO on 23 July 2013.
The issue of new shares formed part of the IPO of the Company on 23 July 2013.
I PAGE 73
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
The weighted average number of shares during the year
of 146,341,197 (2013: 112,904,085) is used to calculate the
Earnings per Share.
(b) Ordinary shares
All issued shares are fully paid and have no par value.
The holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to receive
dividends as declared from time to time.
Ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share at meetings
of the Company.
All Ordinary Shares rank equally with regard to the Company’s
residual assets.
(c) Capital risk management
The Company and Group’s capital includes share capital,
retained earnings and reserves.
The Company and Group’s policy is to maintain a sound
capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence
and to sustain future development of the business. The impact
of the level of capital on shareholders’ return is also recognised
and the Company recognised the need to maintain a balance
between the higher returns that might be possible with greater
gearing and the advantages and security afforded by a sound
capital position.
The Company and Group are subject to various security ratios
within the bank facilities agreement.
The Company and Group’s policies in respect of capital
management and allocation are reviewed by the Board of
Directors.
21 SHARE‑BASED PAYMENTS
The Group operates two share based incentive plans. The
first is an equity settled plan for senior management and
the second is an equity settled plan for all other employees.
The plans are designed to enhance the alignment between
Shareholders and the employees of the company.
(a) IPO Incentive Scheme
The Group has entered into an agreement with each
participant which will provide them with a conditional
contractual right to be issued or transferred a predetermined
number of shares on the third anniversary of completion of the
listing of the Group on the NZX Main Board (the Performance
Date). The issue or transfer of shares pursuant to this scheme
will be at an issue price equal to the IPO listing price of $2.20.
Each participant has been provided with an entitlement which
has a value (calculated as the number of new shares they
could receive multiplied by the IPO listing price) equal to a
maximum of 75% of their base salary as at 1 August 2013. That
entitlement is split into three equal tranches of 25%.
The issue or transfer of new shares is conditional on the
pre-determined performance and service conditions being
satisfied. The performance conditions will be assessed at the
end of each of the three years following the listing of the Group
on the NZX Main Board.
There are two separate performance conditions each of which
must be satisfied. The first requires the Group’s net profit after
tax (NPAT) for the relevant financial year to be at least 10%
above the budgeted NPAT for those periods. If this condition is
not met in any period, then the award for this period will never
vest, even if the condition outlined below is met.
The second requires certain annual compound growth targets
in total shareholder return (TSR) to be satisfied as follows:
20% or more
15%
12%
Less than 12%
25.00
18.75
6.25
-
TSR means the total return, as determined by the Board of
Directors (the Board) in consultation with an independent
expert, to ordinary shareholders comprising any movement in
the market price of the Shares plus gross dividends, expressed
as a percentage of the market price at the start of the relevant
year. For these purposes the market price is the volume
weighted average market price of the Shares on the NZX Main
Board over the twenty business days prior to the relevant
assessment date. The market price at the start of the first year
is the IPO listing price of $2.20.
If the performance conditions are not satisfied in full for the
first and / or second tranche, the relevant tranche(s) will be
retested at the end of each following year up to and including
on the Performance Date. Retesting of the TSR performance
condition will be based on the compound growth in TSR over
the relevant years since the IPO. The highest TSR performance
result over the applicable testing dates will be adopted.
Notwithstanding that the performance conditions may be
satisfied in part or full for any or all of the three tranches,
participants must also satisfy the service conditions. One of
the service conditions is that the participant must continue
to be in full time employment with Synlait Milk Limited at the
Performance Date. In addition a participant will only be issued
or transferred shares under this scheme if the closing price of
the shares on the NZX Main Board on the Performance Date is
above the IPO listing price of $2.20.
There will be no restriction on the sale of the shares once
they have been issued or transferred to participants, however
participants remain subject to the Group’s share trading policy
applicable to all employees, and those shares will have full
voting and dividend rights.
PAGE 74 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Should any of the performance or service conditions not be
met, other than for a qualifying reason, or the executive does
not execute the option, the right to shares will be forfeited and
the participant will receive no benefits under the plan (subject
to the Board exercising a discretion to allow some or all of the
shares or notional shares to vest).
The IPO incentive scheme represents the grant of in substance
nil price options. The fair value of the options granted under
the IPO incentive scheme are estimated as at the date of
grant using an option pricing model that takes into account
the terms and conditions upon which the options were
granted. In accordance with the rules of the plan, the model
simulates the Group’s total shareholder return relative to the
sliding performance scale over the vesting period. The model
takes into account the paths of outcomes that would result
in vesting in relation to the TSR performance condition, the
cost of equity, share price volatilities, an assessment of the
probability of vesting to produce a predicted fair value for each
option. The fair value of each option is then applied to the
number of options expected to vest to determine a total plan
fair value. The NPAT performance condition and the service
condition are taken into account in determining the number of
options expected to vest.
As some of the prerequisite conditions for this scheme were
not satisfied during 2014, some of the options granted have
been forfeited as summarised below.
The following table sets out the number of, and movement in, share options during the year:
Outstanding 1 August
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Outstanding 31 July
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
2013
2014
2013
-
1,564,709
(521,570)
1,043,139
-
-
-
-
-
1,564,709
(521,570)
1,043,139
-
-
-
-
Given the extensive number of permutations of potential outcomes, the options have been valued using a probabilistic
option-pricing model. Management have assessed the likelihood of each of the outcomes in satisfying the varying TSR conditions
and the other key inputs into this model are listed below:
Risk free rate
Market risk premium
Market debt / equity
Volatility
Share price at grant date
Total value of options granted at grant date ($000’s)
Volatility has been estimated by reference to trading entities similar to the Group.
First
Tranche
Second
Tranche
Third
Tranche
3.0%
5.5%
30.0%
20.0%
$2.20
862
3.6%
5.5%
30.0%
20.0%
$3.65
897
3.6%
5.5%
30.0%
20.0%
$3.70
155
I PAGE 75
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(b) Short Term Incentive Scheme
Under the wider employee plan, every employee, other than those included in the IPO incentive scheme, will automatically receive
shares in SML equivalent to a fixed amount divided by the market price of Synlait shares on vesting date. The eligibility to receive
shares is dependent on continued employment through the vesting period and the Company’s net profit before tax performance.
The participant receives a tax paid bonus equivalent to the fixed amount agreed under the plan if vesting occurs. The vesting
period for the plan is from November 2013 through to the date upon which the financial results for the financial year ended 31 July
2014 are announced. The fair value of the rights under the wider employee incentive plan is considered to equal the tax paid fixed
amount payable.
175 letters of offer were extended under the employee share plan totalling a maximum $522,000 (including PAYE) in November 2013.
As the prerequisite performance conditions for this scheme were not satisfied during 2014, all options granted have been
subsequently forfeited.
(c) Expenses arising from share‑based payment transactions
Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee benefit expense
were as follows:
Group $’000
Year ended
2014
$’000
60
2013
$’000
-
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
60
2013
$’000
-
Expenses for equity settled share based payment transactions
22 RESERVES AND RETAINED EARNINGS
(a) Nature and purpose of reserves
(i) Property, plant and equipment revaluation reserve
The revaluation reserve arises on the revaluation of land, buildings, plant and equipment. Where a revalued asset is sold, that
portion of the reserve which relates to that asset, and is effectively realised, is recognised in retained earnings.
(ii) Hedging reserve ‑ cash flow hedges
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging
instruments relating to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.
(iii) Employee benefits reserve
The employee benefits reserve is comprised of the cumulative share based payment expense for share options note yet vested.
(b) Dividends
No dividends were declared by the Company or the Group during the year.
PAGE 76 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
23 RECONCILIATION OF PROFIT AFTER INCOME TAX TO NET CASH INFLOW
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Profit for the year
Non-cash and non operating items:
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
19,603
2013
$’000
11,528
2014
$’000
19,603
2013
$’000
11,528
Depreciation and amortisation of non-current assets
11,377
10,182
11,377
10,182
Loss on sale of fixed assets
Write off intangibles
Non-cash share based payments expense
Interest costs classified as financing cash flow
Interest received classified as investing cash flow
Deferred tax
Gain on derivative / financial instruments
Movements in working capital:
(Increase) / decrease in trade receivables
(Increase) / decrease in other receivables
(Increase) / decrease in prepayments
(Increase) / decrease in inventories
(Increase) / decrease in other current assets
(Decrease) / increase in trade and other payables
(Decrease) / increase in current tax liabilities
Net cash inflow from operating activities
84
97
60
5,474
(130)
4,874
(2,249)
-
-
-
13,525
(1,272)
4,496
84
97
60
5,474
(130)
4,874
-
(1,208)
-
-
-
13,525
(1,272)
4,496
-
(29,395)
(38,846)
(29,395)
(72,941)
(517)
(216)
(6,237)
(5,963)
59,195
2,618
58,675
260
(411)
(34,279)
806
(13,084)
-
(47,095)
(517)
(216)
(6,237)
(5,963)
58,586
2,618
59,107
33,307
(411)
(34,279)
806
(13,198)
-
(48,257)
I PAGE 77
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
24 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk
and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks
to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. The Group uses derivative financial instruments to
hedge certain risk exposures.
(a) Market risk
(i) Foreign exchange risk
The Group enters into derivative arrangements in the ordinary course of business to manage foreign currency risk. The Board
coordinates risk policies on a regular basis.
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on it’s sales, which are predominantly denominated in US dollars. The Group is also
exposed to foreign currency risk on the purchase of capital equipment from overseas. The Group has a Board approved treasury
policy that sets the parameters under which foreign exchange cover is to be taken.
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows:
Trade receivables, being Statement of Financial Position exposure
before hedging activities
31 July 2014
31 July 2013
USD
$’000
67,147
Euro
$’000
1,393
USD
$’000
37,803
Euro
$’000
3
The Group holds derivative contracts with notional balances of US$135.0 m (31 July 2013: US$97.0 m) in respect of future sale
transactions. The Group’s exposure to foreign currency in the period ended 31 July 2014 is limited to it’s sales of dairy products,
purchases of raw materials for production and capital equipment purchases.
(ii) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of the Group’s assets and liabilities will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates.
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its bank overdrafts and borrowings.
The Group manages it’s interest rate risk by using interest rate swaps to hedge it’s floating rate debt.
The Group has a Board approved treasury policy that sets the parameters to the extent of the cover taken.
As at the reporting date, the Group had the following interest rate swap contracts outstanding:
Less than 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
5 to 6 years
6 to 7 years
7 to 8 years
8 to 9 years
9 to 10 years
31 July 2014
31 July 2013
Weighted
Balance
average
interest rate
Weighted
average
interest rate
%
4.85%
4.60%
4.71%
4.73%
4.76%
4.79%
4.82%
4.85%
4.85%
4.86%
$’000
68,583
129,000
116,500
94,000
71,750
50,000
35,000
25,000
19,167
15,000
%
4.32%
5.23%
4.89%
4.04%
-
-
-
-
-
-
Balance
$’000
105,129
57,527
39,000
20,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
The above balances include forward start swap contracts for various periods and do not necessarily reflect the current active
contracts held at any one point in time.
PAGE 78 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
In managing interest rate risks, the Group aims to reduce the impact of short-term fluctuations on the Group’s earnings. Over the
longer-term, however, changes in interest rates will have an impact on profit.
(iii) Sensitivity analysis
The following table summarises the sensitivity of the Group’s profit and equity to interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.
The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on the mark to market impact on financial instruments of changing
interest and foreign exchange rates at balance date. The analysis is prepared assuming the amount of the financial instrument
outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year.
Consolidated
Group
Parent
31 July 2014
1% increase in interest rate
1% decrease in interest rate
2014
Profit
$’000
-
-
Equity
$’000
3,692
(3,902)
5% increase in exchange rate
(1,630)
(5,404)
5% decrease in exchange rate
1,475
4,675
2013
Profit
$’000
-
-
(19)
18
Equity
$’000
473
(473)
2014
2013
Profit
$’000
Equity
$’000
Profit
$’000
Equity
$’000
-
-
-
-
(4,627)
(1,630)
(5,404)
4,187
1,475
4,675
-
-
(19)
18
-
-
(4,627)
4,187
(b) Credit risk
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is mainly influenced by its customer base and banking counterparties. Management has a
credit policy in place under which each new customer is rigorously analysed for credit worthiness. Investments and derivatives are
only made with reputable financial banks.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the Group’s maximum credit exposure. Synlait Milk Limited guarantees all
facilities held by Synlait Milk Finance Limited.
I PAGE 79
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk represents the Group’s ability to meet its contractual obligations. The Group evaluates its liquidity requirements on
an ongoing basis. The Group has negotiated banking facilities sufficient to meet it’s medium term facility requirements.
The Group has internal limits in place in order to reduce exposure to liquidity risk, as well as having committed lines of credit. It
is the Group’s policy to provide credit and liquidity enhancements only to wholly owned subsidiaries. The total repayments and
associated maturity of financial liabilities as at balance date is reported below.
Group
At 31 July 2014
Working capital facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total
At 31 July 2013
Working capital facility
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Loans and borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Total
Less than
12 months
Between
1 and 2 years
Between
2 and 5 years
Over 5
years
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
12,513
116,730
50,666
4,449
2,916
-
-
-
79,306
88
187,274
79,394
33,605
57,536
47,697
2,054
4,379
145,271
357
-
-
2,836
440
3,633
-
-
-
17,519
263
17,782
-
-
-
29,686
-
29,686
-
-
-
-
127
127
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,513
116,730
50,666
101,274
3,394
284,577
33,962
57,536
47,697
34,576
4,819
178,590
PAGE 80 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Parent
At 31 July 2014
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Advances from subsidiary
Derivative financial instruments
Total
At 31 July 2013
Trade and other payables
Trade finance facility
Advances from subsidiary
Derivative financial instruments
Total
(d) Financial instruments by category
Financial assets
Group
At 31 July 2014
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Available for sale financial assets
At 31 July 2013
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Less than 12
months
Between 1
and 2 years
Between 2
and 5 years
Over 5
years
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
116,007
50,666
18,159
2,443
-
-
-
-
79,394
17,782
-
-
187,275
79,394
17,782
57,421
47,697
66,506
2,980
174,604
-
-
3,193
-
3,193
-
-
29,124
-
29,124
-
-
127
-
127
-
-
-
-
-
116,007
50,666
115,462
2,443
284,578
57,421
47,697
98,823
2,980
206,921
Derivatives
used for
hedging
Loans and
receivables
Available
for sale
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’00
-
1,674
-
-
2,393
-
89,046
-
1,674
91,439
-
1,224
-
1,224
2,365
-
59,134
61,499
-
-
-
70
70
-
-
-
-
2,393
1,674
89,046
70
93,183
2,365
1,224
59,134
62,723
I PAGE 81
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Derivatives
used for
hedging
Loans and
receivables
Available
for sale
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
1,595
-
-
2,393
-
89,046
-
1,595
91,439
-
1,138
-
1,138
31,487
-
59,134
90,621
-
-
-
70
70
-
-
-
-
Derivatives
used for
hedging
At
amortised
cost
$’000
$’000
Total
$’000
2,393
1,595
89,046
70
93,104
31,487
1,138
59,134
91,759
Total
$’000
3,394
12,500
50,613
-
12.500
50,613
3,394
-
-
-
-
116,730
116,730
91,376
91,376
3,394
271,219
274,613
4,819
-
-
-
-
-
33,079
46,924
57,535
27,917
4,819
33,079
46,924
57,535
27,917
4,819
165,455
170,274
Parent
At 31 July 2014
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Available for sale financial assets
At 31 July 2013
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Financial liabilities
Group
At 31 July 2014
Derivative financial instruments
Working capital facility
Trade finance facility
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
At 31 July 2013
Derivative financial instruments
Working capital facility
Trade finance facility
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
PAGE 82 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Parent
At 31 July 2014
Derivative financial instruments
Trade finance facility
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
At 31 July 2013
Derivative financial instruments
Trade finance facility
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
25 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Financial instruments
Derivative balances comprise of:
Foreign currency forward contracts
Interest rate swaps
Balance at end of period
Classified as:
Non current asset
Current asset
Non current liabilities
Current liabilities
Derivatives
used for
hedging
$’000
At
amortised
cost
$’000
2,443
-
-
-
2,443
2,980
-
-
-
-
50,613
116,007
104,607
271,227
-
46,924
57,421
91,281
Total
$’000
2,443
50,613
116,007
104,607
273,670
2,980
46,924
57,421
91,281
2,980
195,626
198,606
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
(848)
(872)
(1,720)
42
1,632
(478)
(2,916)
(1,720)
2013
$’000
(1,841)
(1,754)
(3,595)
86
1,138
(440)
(4,379)
(3,595)
2014
$’000
(848)
-
(848)
-
1,595
-
(2,443)
(848)
2013
$’000
(1,842)
-
(1,842)
-
1,138
-
(2,980)
(1,842)
I PAGE 83
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(b) Fair value estimation
The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method. The different levels have been defined as
follows:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1).
Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices)
or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (Level 2).
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (Level 3).
The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at 31 July 2014.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3 Total balance
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
1,518
79
1,674
3
2,440
951
3,394
189
949
86
1,224
1,187
1,792
1,840
4,819
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
1,518
79
1,744
3
2,440
951
3,394
189
949
86
1,224
1,187
1,792
1,840
4,819
Group
At 31 July 2014
Assets
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Interest rate swaps
Total assets
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Interest rate swaps
Total liabilities
At 31 July 2013
Assets
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Interest rate swaps
Total assets
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Interest rate swaps
Total liabilities
PAGE 84 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Parent
At 31 July 2014
Assets
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Total assets
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Total liabilities
At 31 July 2013
Assets
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Total assets
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Options - foreign exchange
Total liabilities
Level 1
$’000
Level 2
$’000
Level 3 Total balance
$’000
$’000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
1,518
1,595
3
2,440
2,443
189
949
1,138
1,187
1,792
2,979
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
1,518
1,665
3
2,440
2,443
189
949
1,138
1,187
1,792
2,979
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance date. A market
is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing
service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length
basis. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. These instruments are included
in Level 1.
The Group is subject to International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreements with its counterparties, thus
where relevant, settlement of financial instruments are netted.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is
determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is
available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are
observable, the instrument is included in Level 2.
If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:
- Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments;
- The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable
yield curves;
- The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange rates at the balance date, with the
resulting value discounted back to present value;
- The fair value of the forward foreign exchange options are valued by projecting the cash flows that will occur and then
discounting the cash flows to the valuation date using a zero-coupon yield curve. The future cash flows have been determined
using an implied forward rate calculated with reference to exchange rate volatilities;
- Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial
instruments.
Note that all of the resulting fair value estimates are included in Level 2.
I PAGE 85
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
26 CONTINGENCIES
As at 31 July 2014 the Parent entity and Group had no contingent liabilities or assets (2013:$Nil).
27 COMMITMENTS
(a) Capital commitments
Capital expenditure contracted for at the end of the reporting period but not yet incurred is as follows:
Lactoferrin
Blending and canning
Drystore 3
Dryer 3
Administration and laboratory building
Transport yard
Other
Total
Group
2014
$’000
-
-
-
78,322
11,946
775
266
2013
$’000
9,790
15,375
13,557
-
-
-
-
Parent
2014
$’000
-
-
-
78,322
11,946
775
266
2013
$’000
9,790
15,375
13,557
-
-
-
-
91,309
38,722
91,309
38,722
The above balances have been committed in relation to future expenditure on capital projects. Amounts already spent have been
included as work in progress.
(b) Operating lease commitments – group/company as lessee
Less than one year
Between one and five years
Total
Group
2014
$’000
69
120
189
2013
$’000
578
144
722
Parent
2014
$’000
69
120
189
2013
$’000
578
144
722
The operating leases relate to the leasing of warehouse space, vehicles and printers. All terms are reviewed on a regular basis. All
leases are subject to potential renewal.
PAGE 86 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
28 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(a) Parent entity
The parent entity is Bright Dairy Holding Limited and the ultimate parent is Bright Dairy and Food Limited which is domiciled in
the Peoples Republic of China. Bright Dairy Holding Limited hold 39.12% of the shares issued by the Company (2013: 39.12%).
(b) Other related entities
In June 2013 a subsidiary of Synlait Milk Limited, Synlait Milk Finance Limited, was set up primarily for holding all banking
facilities for the Group and related interest rate swaps. Funds are loaned to Synlait Milk Limited and interest is charged at market
rates.
(c) Key management and personnel compensation
Other than their salaries and bonus incentives, there are no other cash benefits paid or due to directors and executive officers as at
31 July 2014. The total short-term benefits paid to the key management and personnel is set out below.
Short-term benefits
Share based payment expense (note 21)
2014
$’000
3,538
34
2013
$’000
3,211
-
During the year, the executive team was realigned into a Senior Leadership Team of seven including the CEO (2013: nine). The
short term benefits paid to these key management personnel was $3.1m for the year ended 31 July 2014.
(d) Other transactions with key management personnel or entities related to them
Information on transactions with key management personnel or entities related to them, other than compensation, are set out
below.
(i) Loans to directors
There were no loans to directors issued during the period ended 31 July 2014 (2013: $nil).
(ii) Other transactions and balances
Directors of the Company control 3.8% of the voting shares of the company at balance date (2013: 3.8%).
(e) Subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are set out in note 29.
I PAGE 87
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
(f) Transactions with related parties
Purchase of goods and services
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Directors fees
Synlait Farms Limited - Purchase of raw milk
Sale of goods and services
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Sale of milk powder products
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Reimbursement of costs
Synlait Farms Limited - Management fees received
Interest expense
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
161
-
22,210
(64)
-
-
2013
$’000
183
42,420
2014
$’000
161
-
2013
$’000
183
42,420
8,470
22,210
8,470
87
33
-
-
-
87
33
6,835
114
All transactions with related parties are at arm’s length on normal trading terms.
(g) Outstanding balances
The following balances are outstanding at the reporting date in relation to transactions with related parties: Note that as at 28
February 2013 Synlait Farms Limited ceased to be a related party due to divestment from Synlait Limited.
Current receivables (sales of goods and services)
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Sale of milk powder products
Bright Dairy and Food Co Ltd - Reimbursement of costs
Current payables (purchases of goods)
Synlait Farms Limited - purchase of raw milk
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
Group
Year ended
Parent
Year ended
2014
$’000
1,336
(64)
2013
$’000
325
58
2014
$’000
1,336
(64)
-
-
4,439
-
-
104,607
2013
$’000
325
58
4,439
91,281
PAGE 88 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
29 INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in accordance with
the accounting policy described in note 2(a)(i).
Name of entity
Country of
incorporation
Class of
shares
Synlait Milk Finance Limited
New Zealand
Ordinary
Equity holding
2014
%
100
2013
%
100
In June 2013 a subsidiary, Synlait Milk Finance Limited, was set up primarily for holding all banking facilities for the Group and
related interest rate swaps. Funds are loaned to Synlait Milk Limited and interest is charged at market rates.
30 COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Prospective Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ending 31 July 2014
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross Profit
Other income
Sales and distribution expenses1
Administrative and operating expenses1
Earnings before net financing costs and income tax2
Add back depreciation and amortisation expense2
Earnings before net finance costs, income tax,
depreciation and amortisation2
Net financing costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2014
2014
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
a
b
c
d
e
$’000
600,518
$’000
524,447
$’000
76,071
(523,430)
(448,017)
(75,413)
77,088
76,430
65
(23,305)
(21,409)
32,439
11,377
43,816
(5,344)
27,095
(7,492)
19,603
1,875
(2,249)
104
19,333
30
(24,727)
(19,648)
32,085
11,893
43,978
(4,766)
27,319
(7,649)
19,670
1,400
(1,104)
(84)
19,882
658
35
1,422
(1,761)
354
(516)
(162)
(578)
(224)
157
(67)
475
(1,145)
188
(549)
1 When necessary, current year actuals have been regrouped to conform with the classification of the prospective financial information to enable a fair comparison.
2 The above Non GAAP financial information was included in the prospectus and therefore has been included in these financial statements for comparative
purposes. EBITDA is a metric which management monitors to operate the business.
I PAGE 89
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Explanation of variances
(a) Revenue for the year was higher than PFI by $76.1 m, primarily due to an increase in dairy commodity prices and the ultimate
sales price achieved by Synlait.
(b) Gross Profit, while in line with PFI incorporates the upside associated with our product mix benefits as well as a number of
costs associated with lower infant formula sales than forecast, provisioning against infant formula inventories, product sales
phasing impacts and a high foreign exchange effective rate.
(c) Lower export freight costs than forecast have kept sales and distribution costs below forecast.
(d) Higher than forecast indirect employee costs have resulted in administrative and operating expenses exceeding forecast.
(e) Lower operating cash flow during the year has resulted in higher than forecast working capital facility balances and a higher
financing cost as a result.
Prospective Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ending 31 July 2014
Equity at the start of the period
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2014
2014
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
$’000
164,038
$’000
164,991
$’000
(953)
Profit for the year
19,603
19,670
(67)
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges transferred to profit and loss
Income tax on income and expenses recognised directly in equity
Total other comprehensive loss
Share issue costs
Employee benefits reserve
Total contributions by and distributions to owners
Equity at the end of the period
f
f
g
1,875
(2,249)
104
(270)
(301)
60
(241)
1,400
(1,104)
(84)
212
-
330
330
475
(1,145)
188
(482)
(301)
(270)
(571)
183,130
185,203
(2,073)
Explanation of variances
(f) Movement in reserves is due to the mark to market value of derivatives being higher than PFI due to the fall of the NZD/USD
exchange rate in the second half of July.
(g) Employee benefits reserve is lower than PFI due to a revision of the non-market conditions relevant to the valuation of the share
options following the forfeiture of some options in FY14.
PAGE 90 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Prospective Financial Position - For the year ending 31 July 2014
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Goods and services tax refundable
Income accruals and prepayments
Inventories
Derivative financial instruments
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment1
Other investments
Intangible assets1
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Working capital facility
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Trade finance facility
Derivative financial instruments
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity
Share Capital
Reserves
Retained (deficit) / earnings
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Company
Total equity and liabilities
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2014
2014
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
Notes
$’000
$’000
$’000
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
2,393
89,046
8,880
786
71,262
1,632
-
45,064
3,763
402
49,841
-
173,999
99,070
2,393
43,982
5,117
384
21,421
1,632
74,929
302,594
281,117
21,477
70
181
42
-
230
-
302,887
476,886
281,347
380,417
12,500
116,730
2,618
50,613
2,916
4,923
87,311
-
35,748
146
185,377
128,128
91,376
16,525
478
108,379
293,756
46,570
19,504
1,012
67,086
195,214
172,247
172,473
5,965
4,918
183,130
476,886
8,434
4,296
185,203
380,417
70
(49)
42
21,540
96,469
7,577
29,419
2,618
14,865
2,770
57,249
44,806
(2,979)
(534)
41,293
98,542
(226)
(2,469)
622
(2,073)
96,469
1 When necessary, current year actuals have been regrouped to conform with the classification of the prospective financial information to enable a fair comparison.
I PAGE 91
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Explanation of variances
(h) Accounts receivable was $44.0 m higher than PFI due to a larger than forecast amount of sales being achieved in July 2014.
(i) Inventories were $21.5 m higher than PFI due to higher than forecast inventory levels in addition to a higher cost of inventory
as a consequence of a higher milk price.
(j) Property, plant and equipment was $21.5 m higher than the PFI predominantly due to deposits paid for the third dryer forecast
for FY15.
(k) Net working capital facility is higher than PFI, primarily due to lower than forecast operating cash flows as a consequence
of later sales phasing.
(l) Trade and other payables are $29.4 m higher than the PFI due to the higher milk price.
(m) Trade finance facility was $14.9 m higher than the PFI due to sales phasing being later in the year than forecast.
(n) Loans and borrowings are $44.8 m higher than PFI due to higher than forecast capital spend and lower than forecast
discretionary repayments.
Prospective Cash Flow Statement - For the year ending 31 July 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers
Cash paid for milk purchased
Cash paid to other creditors and employees
Goods and services tax refunds
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Group
Group
Year ended
Year ended
2014
2014
Notes
Actual
Prospectus
Variance
$’000
$’000
$’000
o
p
571,955
(362,551)
(141,077)
(5,963)
62,364
533,927
(301,319)
(146,086)
(992)
85,530
38,028
(61,232)
5,009
(4,971)
(23,166)
130
193
(63)
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment1
q
(97,380)
(68,713)
(28,667)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of intangibles1
Purchases of available-for-sale financial assets
133
(4)
(70)
-
-
-
133
(4)
(70)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
(97,191)
(68,520)
(28,671)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds and costs from issue of shares
Repayment of borrowings
Receipt of borrowings
Interest paid
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Net working capital facility at the beginning of the period
Net working capital facility at the end of the period 2
r
r
(301)
(743)
(17,699)
(36,500)
80,638
(7,204)
55,434
20,607
(30,714)
(10,107)
62,121
(7,056)
(17,822)
34,832
(39,755)
(4,923)
442
18,801
18,517
(148)
37,612
(14,225)
9,041
(5,184)
1 When necessary, current year actuals have been regrouped to conform with the classification of the prospective financial information to enable a fair comparison.
2 Net working capital facility is used in the comparison to PFI Statement of Cash Flows for comparability purposes as this is how it was treated in the Prospectus. In
the financial statements cash and cash equivalent is used and this will be the treatment going forward.
PAGE 92 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 JULY 2014
Explanation of variances
(o) Sales receipts are $38.0 m higher than PFI due to higher dairy commodity prices, partially offset by later sales phasing.
(p) Cash paid for milk purchases were $61.2 m higher than PFI due to an increased milk price.
(q) Cash purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment are $28.7 m higher than PFI as there has been an acceleration of capital projects.
(r) Net borrowings is $37.3 m more than the PFI, due to lower than forecast operating cash flows, increased capital spend and lower
discretionary loan repayments.
31 EVENTS OCCURRING AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
There were no events occurring subsequent to balance date which require adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.
I PAGE 93
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014AUDITOR’S REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF SYNLAIT MILK LIMITED
REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the financial statements of Synlait Milk Limited and group on pages 47 to 93, which comprise the consolidated
and separate statements of financial position of Synlait Milk Limited, as at 31 July 2014, the consolidated and separate statements
of comprehensive income, statements of changes in equity and statements of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary
of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
This report is made solely to the company’s shareholders, as a body, in accordance with Section 205(1) of the Companies Act
1993. Our audit has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s shareholders those matters we are required to
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the company’s shareholders as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions
we have formed.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors are responsible for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting practice in New Zealand and that give a true and fair view of the matters to which they relate, and for such internal
control as the Board of Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in
accordance with International Standards on Auditing and International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards
require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of
the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control
relevant to the entity’s preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view of the matters to which they relate in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies
used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates, as well as the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Other than in our capacity as auditor and the provision of financial model assurance services, taxation consulting services and
other advisory services, we have no relationship with or interests in Synlait Milk Limited or its subsidiary. These services have
not impaired our independence as auditor of the Company and Group.
PAGE 94 I
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014AUDITOR’S REPORT CONT...
OPINION
In our opinion, the financial statements on pages 47 to 93:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;
- comply with International Financial Reporting Standards; and
- give a true and fair view of the financial position of Synlait Milk Limited and group as at 31 July 2014, and their financial
performance and cash flows for the year then ended.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
We also report in accordance with section 16 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993. In relation to our audit of the financial
statements for the year ended 31 July 2014:
- we have obtained all the information and explanations we have required; and
-
in our opinion proper accounting records have been kept by Synlait Milk Limited as far as appears from our examination
of those records.
Chartered Accountants
19 September 2014
Auckland, New Zealand
I PAGE 95
Synlait Milk Limited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014STATUTORY DISCLOSURES
WE’RE COMMITTED
TO A HIGH PERFORMANCE
WORKING
ENVIRONMENT
PAGE 96 I
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014
Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014Synlait Milk Limited Annual Report 2014 I PAGE 97
STATUTORY INFORMATION
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
Our shares are listed on the Main Board of the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX).
SHARES ON ISSUE
As at 31 July 2014:
Register
Sub-register
Current Holders
Zero Holders
New Zealand
FASTER
Class Total
2,884
2,884
1,207
1,207
Units
146,341,197
146,341,197
Last year as at 31 July 2013, we had the same amount of shares of 146,341,197 but these were held by 2,412 holders.
TOP 20 SHAREHOLDERS
Our top 20 shareholders as at 31 July 2014 are as follows:
Rank Name
Units at
% of Units
Bright Dairy Holding Limited
FNZ Custodians Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above