Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Auto - Parts / Sypris Solutions, Inc.

Sypris Solutions, Inc.

sypr · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker sypr
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Auto - Parts
Employees 713
← All annual reports
FY2001 Annual Report · Sypris Solutions, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report 2001

Leadership

101 BULLITT LANE, SUITE 450

LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40222

Phone: (502) 329-2000

Fax: (502) 329-2050

www.sypris.com

Financial Highlights

Years ended December 31
(in thousands, except for per share data)

Income Statement Data:
Net revenue
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income

Per Share Data:
Net income:

Basic
Diluted

December 31
(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital
Total assets
Total debt
Total stockholders’ equity

2001

2000

1999

$ 254,640
43,547
13,030
6,367

$
$

$

0.65
0.63

2001

67,325
211,444
87,500
70,120

$ 216,571
40,313
5,477
3,184

$
$

$

0.33
0.32

2000

58,602
179,122
65,000
64,205

$ 202,130
44,949
14,166
9,556

$
$

$

1.00
0.97

1999

53,705
148,564
54,400
60,820

$255

$217

$202

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

99

00

01

Net Revenue
(in millions)

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

$27.6

$23.9

$14.4

99

00

01

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

$14.2

$13.0

$5.5

99

00

01

Operating Income
(in millions)

$0.97

$0.63

$0.32

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

99

00

01

Diluted Earnings
Per Share

180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

$161

$162

$127

$13.02

$9.00

$6.87

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

99

00

01

99

00

01

Capital Investment
(in millions)

Order Backlog
(in millions)

Closing Stock Price
(per share)

Contents
Letter to Stockholders 2
Market Leadership 6
Aerospace and Defense Electronics  8
Truck Components and Assemblies 12
Test and Measurement Services 16
Our People 20
Sypris at a Glance 24
M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis 2 6
Financial Statements and Notes 3 2
Report of Independent Auditors 4 8
Financial Summary 4 9
Corporate Directory 5 0
Company Locations 5 1
Common Stock Information 5 2
Investor Information 5 3

Sypris Solutions is a diversified provider of
outsourced services and specialty products.
We perfo rm a wide range of manu fa c t u ri n g ,
e n g i n e e ring, design, testing and other 
technical serv i c e s, typically under mu l t i - ye a r,
sole-source contracts with major corp o ra t i o n s
and gove rnment agencies.

We are fo c u s e d on three core marke t s :
aerospace and defense electronics, tru ck
components and assembl i e s, and test and
measurement serv i c e s.

Our mission is to become the leading supply
chain partner in each of our core marke t s.

Revenue Mix

Markets

18%
Products

18%
Technical 
Services 

64%
Manufacturing
Services 

12%
Other 

13%
Truck 
Components 
& Assemblies 

15%
Test &
M e a s u r e m e n t
Services 

60%
Aerospace 
& Defense 
Electronics 

Sypris Annual Report 2001

1

Fellow Stockholders

We are pleased to report that 2001 marked a

year of accomplishment for Sypris Solutions

JeffreyT. Gill, President & CEO 
Robert  E.Gill, Chairman (standing)

Improved Financial Results.

m a nu fa c t u ring assets from Dana, provides for Sypris to

R eve nue for the year increased almost 18% to

supply manu fa c t u ring services for the forging and

$255 million from $217 million in 2000.The increase

machining of medium and heavy-duty dri ve train 

was dri ven by gr owth in demand for the Company ’s

components for use in assemblies sold to the leading

m a nu fa c t u ring serv i c e s. Roughly 70% of the 

t ru ck manu facturers in the wo rld, including Fr e i g h t l i n e r,

i m p r ovement came from higher shipments of electronic

M a ck, Nav i s t a r, PACCAR and Vo l vo.

a s s e m blies to the Company ’s aerospace and defe n s e

c u s t o m e r s, while the balance was pri m a rily deri ve d

from a new contract with Dana Corp o ra t i o n .

The agreement runs through 2008 and has an 

estimated value of $300 million over the term of the

c o n t ract, based upon current market vo l u m e s.The 

O p e rating income increased 138% to $13 million

c o n t ract is significant for two ve ry important reasons 

as a result of improved operating leve rage and stri c t

in addition to the dollar value and length of the 

cost containment, while earnings per share increased

c o m m i t m e n t .

97% to $0.63 from $0.32 in 2000. S t o ck h o l d e r ’s 

equity increased to $70 million and book value per

share reached $6.99 by year end.

First, with the advent of the Dana contract, Sypri s

is now the principal supplier of medium and heav y - d u t y

t ru ck axle shafts in North America, since we also supply

The price of the Company ’s stock reflected the

the needs of Arv i n M e ri t o r, the other pri m a ry supplier of

strength of this financial perfo rm a n c e, increasing 89%

d ri ve train assemblies in this marke t . The length and

to $13.02 per share by the end of December.We we r e

nature of the Dana and Arv i n M e ritor contracts will

pleased with these results, especially in light of the

e n a ble us to continue to invest to support these two

challenging economic environment that chara c t e ri ze d

i m p o rtant customers for years to come.

most of 2001.

Second, the contract marks the addition of Dana

Key Contract Awards.

as a new customer for Sypri s. Dana has long been 

The year was notable for our continued success in

r e c o g n i zed as one of the premier automotive and tru ck

booking new contra c t s, including important mu l t i - ye a r

component suppliers in the wo rld, with approx i m a t e l y

a greements with Honey well, the National Securi t y

300 plants in 34 countri e s.We believe that we can be

A g e n c y, the National Weather Service and Ray t h e o n .

of significant service to Dana and will wo rk hard to 

Company improved its position of leadership in each

In late May, we also signed a seve n - ye a r, sole-source

f u rther develop this new relationship.

of its core mar kets, we entered into a number of key

a greement with Dana to supply all of its requirements

In Fe b ru a ry 2002, we announced that Sypris had

been awarded a new manu fa c t u ring services contra c t

to produce light axle shafts for Visteon Corp o ra t i o n ,

across a number of very important fronts. Revenue

long-term contracts and we continued to increase our

for certain components in North Ameri c a .

and earnings posted solid double-digit increases, the

investment in the future.

The Dana contract, which was part of a larger

t ransaction that included the purchase of certain 

2/3

Sypris Annual Report 2001

(standing) Anthony C. Allen, G. Darrell Robertson,
David D. Johnson, Henry L. Singer II 
(seated) John M. Kramer, Richard L. Davis,James G. Cocke

In addition, we also inve s t e d

Our customer, the National Security Agency, is 

and repair services for equipment used by the FAA to

$11.5 million in the purchase of

currently evaluating the potential deployment of this

maintain its radar systems and directional beacons at

m a nu fa c t u ring assets from Dana in 

technology for use by our armed serv i c e s.

each of the airp o rts it serves in the U. S., the Cari bb e a n

conjunction with the new supply

a greement mentioned above. T h e

t ransaction added va l u a ble fo r g i n g

and machining capacity, increased

our range of value-added serv i c e s

and added significant depth and

va l u a ble ex p e rience to our 

management team.

D u ring 2001, we began the

installation of sophisticated materi a l

t ra cking capabilities and adva n c e d

scheduling systems at certain of our manu fa c t u ri n g

o p e ra t i o n s.We expect these installations to be 

complete and operational during the first half of 2002,

the result of which should further enhance our ability to

o f fer our customers advanced manu fa c t u ring solutions.

which represents an important new segment of the

m a rket for us. Under the terms of the agreement, we

will initially support V i s t e o n ’s requirements to supply

Ford Motor C o m p a ny with dri ve train assemblies for 

the F-150 pickup tru ck, the Ford Expedition and the

Lincoln Navigator sport utility ve h i c l e s. Beginning in

Ja nu a ry 2004, we will supply light axle shafts for the

Providing Customers with Solutions.

One Name, One Company.

and the South Pa c i f i c .

Last ye a r, we announced plans to change the

We would not be able to build upon these positions

name of our four major subsidiaries to incorp o rate the

of strength were it not for the dedication, strength, 

S y p ris brand name and logo.The purpose of the name

c r e a t i v i t y, commitment and leadership of our employe e s.

change was to improve brand recognition with common

We are pleased to have the opportunity to recognize a

customers and suppliers, as well as with employe e s

number of these leaders this year on the cover and

and inve s t o r s.

t h r o u g h o u t this annual report . We truly believe that our

As a result of the dedicated effo rt of a small 

group of employe e s, we are pleased to announce that

e m p l oyees really do make a difference and we are thri l l e d

to be able to showcase some of their accomplishments.

e f fe c t i ve Ja nu a ry 2002, Bell Technologies has become

Thank You.

S y p ris Test & Measurement, Group Technologies has

In closing, we want to thank our employees fo r

become Sypris Electronics, Metrum-Datatape has

their dedication and hard wo rk over this past ye a r. T h e

become Sypris Data Systems and Tube Tu rns has

a c h i evements of 2001 would not have been possibl e

become Sypris Te c h n o l o g i e s.

without their commitment.We also want to thank our

The Importance of Leadership.

Our mission is to become the leading supply chain

p a rtner in each of our core marke t s.We want to do so

customers for the opportunity to serve them.We are

dedicated to providing each of them with solutions to

i m p r ove their competitiveness in the marke t p l a c e.

Ford F-250, F-350 and Ranger series pickup tru ck s,

and the Mustang GT as we l l . The contract has an 

estimated value of $100 million over the term of the

a greement and runs through 2006.

Our job is to provide customers with solutions to

because we believe the result will generate superi o r

We sincerely appreciate your investment in Sypri s

succeed in a rapidly changing and increasingly 

r e t u rns for the Company ’s stockholders and will create

Solutions and encourage you to contact us.We wo u l d

c o m p e t i t i ve business env i r o n m e n t . D u ring the ye a r, 

a positive, dynamic and gr ow t h - o riented culture for 

be pleased to answer your questions and look fo r wa r d

we completed the installation of new, state-of-the-art

our employe e s.

to your comments.

Investing for the Future.

machining capabilities.The integration of these new

D u ring the ye a r, we maintained our steadfast 

activities with our existing operations will enable us to

commitment to the future by increasing capital inve s t-

reduce labor and shipping costs, and minimize cycle

ment 16% to almost $28 million from $24 million in

times for our customers.

We believe we are off to a good start . We have

been a leading supplier of manu fa c t u ring and technical

s e rvices to major aerospace and defense companies

and agencies of the U. S. G ove rnment for over 35

2 0 0 0 . The inve s t m e n t s, which were pri m a rily made to

s u p p o rt the requirements of new contra c t s, should begin

to contri bute to reve nue and earnings during 2002.

We also developed a data encryption notebook

ye a r s, we are the principle supplier of medium and

that delivers the most advanced, technically ava i l a bl e

h e avy-duty tru ck axle shafts in North America, and 

solution for security in field communications products.

we are the sole supplier of calibration, certification 

Jeffrey T. Gill
President & CEO

Robert E. Gill
Chairman

4/5

Sypris Annual Report 2001

Market leadership 
and people hold 
the keys to a future 
of consequence.

The ability to achieve results of significance in today ’s
intensely competitive wo rld without a position of leadership
is all but impossibl e.

At Sypri s, we have leading positions in each of our
core markets and the highly qualified, motivated employe e s
that are essential to build upon these positions of marke t
s t r e n g t h . In our view, the combination of these two vital 
elements represents the key to a successful future, one 
of significant consequence.

Aerospace and Defense Electronics.

We have been a leading supplier of manu fa c t u ri n g
s e rvices and data storage systems to major aerospace and
d e fense companies and agencies of the U. S. G ove rn m e n t
for over 35 ye a r s.Our customers include Boeing, Honey we l l ,
L o ckheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Ray t h e o n . We
m a nu facture complex circuit cards, high-level assembl i e s
and subsystems for applications where performance,
precision and reliability are critical, such as missile 
guidance systems, avionics and satellite commu n i c a t i o n s
s y s t e m s.We also have a long-term relationship with the
National Security Agency to design and build secure 
c o m munications equipment, data acquisition and stora g e
s y s t e m s, and to write encryption softwa r e.

Truck Components and Assemblies.

We are the leading supplier of manu fa c t u ring serv i c e s

for the forging and machining of medium and heav y - d u t y
t ru ck axle shafts in North Ameri c a . We provide these serv i c e s
under mu l t i - ye a r, sole-source contracts with Arv i n M e ri t o r
and Dana, the two pri m a ry providers of dri ve train 

a s s e m blies for the leading tru ck manu facturers in the wo rl d ,
including Fr e i g h t l i n e r, Mack, Nav i s t a r, PACCAR and Vo l vo.
We also have a mu l t i - year contract to produce light axle
shafts for Visteon to support its requirements to supply Fo r d
Motor Company with dri ve train assemblies for the F-150, 
F-250, F-350 and Ranger series pickup tru ck s, the
Expedition, the Lincoln Navigator and the Mustang GT.

Test and Measurement Services.

We are a leading provider of technical services for the
c a l i b ration, certification and repair of test and measurement
equipment in the U. S.Our customers include AT & T, Bose,
Lucent, Siemens and T RW, which utilize these services to
ensure their equipment is maintained in accordance with 
c e rtain quality assurance standards.We are also the sole
p r ovider of these services for instruments used by the FAA to
maintain the radar systems and directional beacons at ove r
400 airp o rts in the U. S., Cari bbean and the South Pa c i f i c,
and for equipment used by the National Weather Service to
maintain the NEXRAD Doppler radar systems at each of its
132 advanced wa rning weather service radar stations.

Our People.

We have smart, ex p e rienced, hard-wo rking employe e s

who have assumed leadership roles in all areas of our 
business and who are dedicated to providing our customers
with solutions to increase their competitive n e s s.Without the
commitment, creativity and persistence of these individuals,
S y p ris would not have a future of significant consequence.
In the truest sense of the word, these leaders represent our
finest and most cherished asset.

6/7

Sypris Annual Report 2001

Aerospace and Defense Electronics

Where performance, precision and reliability are critical.

We are a leading 
supplier of manufacturing
services for the production
of complex circuit cards 
for use in missile guidance
systems, avionics and
satellite communications
systems.

8/9

Sypris Annual Report 2001

Aerospace and Defense Electronics  Where performance, precision and reliability are critical.

Opportunity:
The market for Aerospace
and Defense Electronics 
is expected to increase
30% by 2005.

According to Electronic Trend Publ i c a t i o n s

a n d N ew Venture Research, the total aero-
space and defense electronics market in Nort h
A m e rica is expected to gr ow from $33.6 billion
in 2001 to $43.9 billion in 2005. In addition,
these sources estimate that the outsourcing of
m a nu fa c t u ring and technical services in this
m a rket will gr ow from $1.4 billion in 2000 to
$7.9 billion in 2005.

The number of suppliers that are qualified
to participate in this gr owth, howeve r, is limited
by the special nature and requirements of the
wo rk . The cost of failure can be extremely high,
the manu fa c t u ring requirements are typically
c o m p l ex and the electronic assemblies are 
produced in relatively small quantities.
Companies that provide these manu fa c t u ri n g
and technical services are required to maintain
and adhere to a number of strict cert i f i c a t i o n s,
s e c u rity clearances and traceability standards
that are often quite comprehensive.

We believe that we are uniquely positioned

to take advantage of this trend.We have 

l o n g - t e rm, well established relationships with
m a ny of the leading aerospace and defe n s e
c o n t ra c t o r s, including Boeing, Honey we l l ,
L o ckheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and
R ay t h e o n . We currently manu facture complex
circuit card assemblies under mu l t i - year 
c o n t racts for the missile guidance systems 
of the AMRAAM, BAT, Brimstone and HARM
missile progra m s, and for the main color display
systems of the AH-64 Apache Longbow 
a t t a ck helicopter.We also have a 37-ye a r - o l d
relationship with the National Security Agency
to design and build secure commu n i c a t i o n
equipment, data acquisition and storage 
s y s t e m s, and to write encryption softwa r e.

We believe that our ex t e n s i ve ex p e ri e n c e,

c l e a ra n c e s, cert i f i c a t i o n s, qualifications and
relationships with the leading aerospace and
d e fense companies and agencies of the U. S.
G ove rnment will continue to serve us well and
d i f ferentiate Sypris from many of the more 
t raditional outsource suppliers.

10/11 Sypris Annual Report 2001

$43.9

$33.2

50

40

30

20

10

0

00  05

Aerospace/Defense
Electronics
(in billions)

10

8

6

4

2

0

$7.9

$1.4

00  05

Aerospace/Defense
Outsourcing
(in billions)

We are the 
leading supplier 
of manufacturing 
services for the 
production of medium 
and heavy-duty tru ck axle
shafts in North America.

Truck Components and Assemblies

Helping customers compete on a global scale.

12/13 Sypris Annual Report 2001

500

400

300

200

100

0

467

472

408

322

331

00  01 02 03

04

Medium and Heavy-Duty 
Truck Production
(in thousands of units)

Truck Components and Assemblies  Helping customers compete on a global scale.

Opportunity:
The production of 
medium and heavy-duty
trucks is forecast to
increase 23% in 2003.

According to Ameri c a ’s Commercial

Tra n s p o rtation Publ i c a t i o n s, the Nort h
A m e rican production of medium and heav y -
duty tru cks is expected to increase slightly 
to approximately 331,000 units in 2002, 
as compared to levels reported in 2001.
Production is forecast to increase 23% to
408,000 units in 2003 and then increase a 
f u rther 16% to 472,000 units in 2004. In 
addition, Dana estimates the production of
medium and heavy-duty tru cks could reach
500,000 units by 2005.

We are well positioned to benefit from 
a ny increase in the production of medium 
and heavy-duty tru cks in North Ameri c a .
Our contracts with Arv i n M e ritor and Dana, 
the two pri m a ry providers of dri ve train 
a s s e m blies to the leading tru ck manu fa c t u r e r s
in the wo rld, run through 2004 and 2008,
r e s p e c t i ve l y.

In addition, we believe that a significant
o p p o rtunity exists to increase our bu s i n e s s
with existing customers, as well as with many
of the other leading automotive and tru ck 
component suppliers. M a ny of these large
companies are confronted with excess 
capacity and aging capital equipment, the
impact of which is further magnified by the
intensely competitive nature of the bu s i n e s s.
As a result, the market remains under intense
pressure to reduce capital ex p e n d i t u r e s, 
production costs and inve n t o ry leve l s.

We believe that as these companies 

seek to address these issues, they will
increasingly select strong outsourcing 
p a rt n e r s, such as Sypri s, as a means to
enhance their financial perfo rm a n c e, increase
their return on assets and improve the 
c o m p e t i t i veness of their offe ri n g s.

14/15 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Test and Measurement Services

Meeting mission-critical charters in the most remote of locations.

We are a leading 
supplier of technical 
services for the calibration,
certification and repair of
test and measurement
equipment in the U.S.

16/17 Sypris Annual Report 2001

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

176

150

122

86

97  98 99 00

ISO Certifications
(in thousands)

Test and Measurement Services  Meeting mission-critical charters in the most remote of locations.

Opportunity:
ISO certifications have
increased at an average
rate of 27% per year
since 1997.

The widespread adoption of ISO quality
standards and processes has been under way
for many years and has led to a surging demand
for highly reliable test and m e a s u r e m e n t
equipment.The periodic verification of the
accuracy of these i n s t ruments is a critical 
component of any ISO certification process.

The investment in the people and 

equipment required to support the calibra t i o n
and certification process has historically been 
p e r fo rmed offsite by the manu facturers of the
equipment, or onsite by internal opera t i o n s,
even though the productive use of the 
assets and people is difficult to justify since 
c e rtain instruments are only certified on an
a n nual basis.

which can use the manpower and equipment
across a diversified base of customers, 
reduce investment requirements and improve
profitability on a national scale.

To support such customer requirements,

we have an ex t e n s i ve fleet of ISO-cert i f i e d
mobile calibration labora t o ries that service our
customers in the U. S., the Cari bbean and the
South Pa c i f i c . We operate 17 separate 
c a l i b ration, certification and repair labora t o ri e s
that are located throughout the U. S., and we
manage the onsite service requirements fo r
companies such as Bose, Square D and
D e l p h i . We also maintain our own independent
p ri m a ry standards lab that is tra c e a ble to the
National Institute of Standards and Te c h n o l o g y.

We believe that these and other test and

measurement services will increasingly be 
outsourced to specialists, such as Sypri s, 

We believe we are in a strong position 
to benefit from this trend and to expand our
position of leadership in this marke t .

18/19 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Our People

Dedicated to providing our customers with solutions.

We have smart, 
experienced, hard-working
leaders in all areas of our
business who represent 
the future of Sypris.

1/21 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Our People  Dedicated to providing our customers with solutions.

Opportunity:
Press on.
Nothing in the
world can take
the place of 
persistence.

The fine people featured on the cover and
throughout this annual report represent the type 
of individuals that one would expect to find at
S y p ris - dedicated, ex p e rienced, hard-wo rking and
focused on results. In short, they are leaders in
pursuit of consequence.

The stories of the five individuals illustrated 
to the right are symbolic of the effo rts of many of
our employees throughout the Company. Please 
join us in thanking each and eve ry one of our 
e m p l oyees for their dedication, contri bution and
commitment to the future of Sypri s.

22/23 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Pat Byron

With degrees in physics and mechanical engineering, and with

over a decade’s experience in operations and engineering with
Honeywell’s Space Systems Division, Pat joined Sypris in early
2001 as Director of Operations for Sypris Electronics. The timing
could not have been better.

Our operations in Tampa, which provide critical manufacturing
s e rvices for most of the leading aerospace and defense companies,
was confronted with a number of operating issues as the business

struggled with component shortages, tight delivery schedules, cost
growth and fraying nerves. Fortunately, Pat knew just what to do.
Pat moved out onto the factory floor and never left it. She
oversaw vast improvements in productivity and manufacturing 
output through the use of Six Sigma and other tools. With her
hands-on, team-oriented approach, delivery schedules became
current, customer satisfaction soared and employee morale topped
the charts.

Gene DesJardin

Gene joined Sypris Data Systems in 2000 after serving in a

va riety of manu fa c t u ring engineering and quality roles over the past
25 years. His vast experience and important affiliations with the
Society of Manufacturing Engineering and American Society of
Quality made him an ideal candidate to lead the ISO certification
efforts at this subsidiar y.

Sypris Data Systems, which specializes in the design and 

manufacture of high-performance data recording and storage 
systems for use by intelligence, space and military agencies
around the globe, needed Gene’s help, for without the ISO 

certification, the business was at risk of losing some of its vaunted
credibility for superior quality with the international community.

Thanks to Gene and the entire Sypris Data Systems team, the

Company was awarded its ISO 9001 certification in January 2002
after the completion of a highly concentrated year-long process.
The outstanding reputation of the business has been preserved
and our customers now have the additional surety that each of our
products is designed, documented and produced in conformity with
the highest of international standards for quality.

Carroll Dunavent

Carroll has been the Director of Legal and Corporate Services
for Sypris since its inception as a publicly-traded company in 1998.
With responsibility for our compliance prog rams, stockholder and
equity programs, corporate communications and o versight of the
Company’s intellectual property, among other items, you might
think that Carroll’s plate was fairly full.Not so.

With time running short, Carroll agreed to step in and lead a

team of professionals from throughout Sypris who were tasked with
a major branding challenge: to change the name of each of our

four major subsidiaries to adopt the Sypris name and logo, and to
do so while avoiding potentially harmful confusion with customers,
employees, suppliers and local communities. No easy task.

The group worked long hours, addressed divergent views and

dealt with a variety of difficult local issues head on.The project 
expanded into the redesign and consolidation of five separate 
and distinct Web sites to insure that each of the Company’s
constituents would receive a clear and consistent message. It
came down to the final wire, but they were remarkably successful.

Scott Patterson

Scott has been with the Company for 16 years and has 
responsibility for production, engineering, quality, production 
control, purchasing, maintenance and facilities for the Louisville
forging operation of Sypris Te c h n o l o g i e s.With degrees in mechanical 
e n g i n e e ring and aviation technology to go along with his commercial
pilot license, Scott was the ideal choice to captain one of the
Company’s most important projects in years.

The mission was daunting. Scott and his team had less than 
24 months to design, purchase and install manu fa c t u ring cells that

would enable the Company to produce axle shafts for the light, 
medium and heavy-duty tru ck markets at speeds that were four to
f i ve times faster than the Company ’s current production ra t e s. T h e
C o m p a ny ’s future success depended upon it.

Scott and his team wo rked mira c l e s, and sometimes around the
c l o ck, to make it happen, but happen it did.As a result of their hard 
wo rk and dedication, we can now offer our customers state-of-the-art
m a nu fa c t u ring solutions that are cost-competitive on a global scale
at a time when our customers need it most.To d ay.

Dr. Mike Pietrantonio

Dr. Mike has served as the Staff Scientist for Sypris Test &
Measurement since 1997, after having completed a distinguished 
15-year career with Spar Aerospace of Canada, where he and 
others were involved with the design of the maneuvering arm of 
the Space Shuttle. Little did he know that NASA would soon need
his help again.

The Kennedy Space Center was concerned about a major
issue involving the Space Shuttle Program that had been stumping
NASA scientists and engineers for some time. In an attempt to
solve the p r o blem, NASA invited a dozen or so scientists, including

D r. M i ke, to a conference to see if they could help. Fortunately, the
answer was yes.

Not only did Dr. Mike isolate the problem, but after consulting
with the manufacturer of the part, United Space Alliance, Dr. Mike
also devised the corrective action required for the successful 
production of the component. As a result of his fine work, Space
Shuttle launches were able to continue as planned, a valuable 
customer was provided with a much-needed solution and we now
h ave an important business relationship with United Space Alliance.

Financial Review

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis of 
Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Consolidated Income Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Auditors

Financial Summary

26 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

48 

49 

Sypris At A Glance

Manufacturing Services

Technical Services

Products

Electronic

Calibration and Repair

Data Systems

Integrated design and engineering services,
component selection, sourcing and procure-
ment, automated assembly, design and
implementation of product testing, systems
assembly, and repair and warranty services.

Wireless communication test equipment,
control tower radar and directional beacon
test equipment, digital oscilloscopes,
microwave equipment and fiber optic 
measuring equipment.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Electronic assemblies and subsystems 
for use in missile guidance systems, 
commercial avionics, satellite 
communications systems, ruggedized hand-
held computers, semiconductor processing
equipment, and secure communications
networks and products.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

BAE, Boeing, FBI, Honeywell, Lam Research,
Lockheed Martin, National Security Agency,
Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and U.S. Army.

Industrial

Automated forging, machining, induction
hardening, cold extrusion and heat treating
services.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Light, medium and heavy-duty truck axle
shafts, jet engine shafts and construction
vehicle components.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

ArvinMeritor, Caterpillar, Dana, John Deere, 
Pratt & Whitney, Teledyne Technologies 
and Visteon.

Maintenance of cellular communications
systems, air traffic control systems, 
broadband telecommunication systems 
and quality certification programs in 
manufacturing operations.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

AT&T, Bose, Delphi Automotive, FAA,
Honeywell, Intel, Lucent Technologies,
National Weather Service, Raytheon, 
Square D and TRW.

Component Testing

RF, microwave and mixed signal component
testing, environmental testing, dynamics
testing and failure analysis.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Semiconductor manufacturing, aerospace
and satellite systems.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

Boeing, EFTC, Eldec, Honeywell, Lockheed
Martin, NASA, Raytheon and Texas
Instruments.

Engineering Services

Encryption software design services and
contract design services.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Network and communications security.

Digital and analog recorders, multiplexers,
storage systems and touch screen control
software.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Collection of sonar data from submarines,
test data from aircraft, biological data 
from space flights, performance data from
missiles and voice data from intelligence
networks.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

Government of Israel, Johnson Space
Center, Lockheed Martin, National Security
Agency, Raytheon, U.S. Air Force, and 
U.S. Navy.

Magnetics

Hall generators, current sensors, 
autoprobes and gaussmeters.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Current measurement applications in 
locomotives, mass transit systems, 
elevators, automotive diagnostic systems
and laboratory diagnostic systems.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

Agilent, Artesyn, Bombardier, General
Motors, Genie, IBM, Lockheed Martin,
Miltope, Snap-on and Toyo.

Specialty

High-pressure closures, transition joints 
and insulated joints.

APPLICATIONS AND USES

Pipeline and chemical systems in the energy
and chemical industries.

SELECT CUSTOMERS

SELECT CUSTOMERS

National Security Agency and U.S. Army.

Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell Oil.

24/25 Sypris Annual Report 2001

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

The following discussion of our results of operations and
financial condition should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. This
discussion contains forw a rd-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could diff e r
materially from the results anticipated in the forw a rd - l o o k i n g
statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those
discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
C o m m i s s i o n .

As of January 1, 2002, we changed the name of our four

major operating subsidiaries as part of a compre h e n s i v e
branding initiative. The new names of our four subsidiaries
a re: Sypris Data Systems, Inc., formerly Metru m - D a t a t a p e ,
Inc.; Sypris Electronics, LLC, formerly Group Te c h n o l o g i e s
Corporation; Sypris Technologies, Inc., formerly Tube Tu rn s
Technologies, Inc.; and Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.,
f o rmerly Bell Technologies, Inc.

Our significant accounting policies are described in 
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. We believe
our most critical accounting policies include re v e n u e
recognition and cost estimation on certain contracts for
which we use a percentage of completion, units of delivery
method of accounting. This accounting method is applied 
by our Electronics Group for outsourced services pro v i d e d
under multi-year contracts with aerospace & defense
customers. Approximately 53%, 49% and 45% of total 
net revenue was recognized under the percentage of
completion, units of delivery method of accounting during
2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Revenue is recognized on these contracts when units

a re delivered to the customer, with unit revenue based 
upon unit prices as set forth in the applicable contracts. The
c o rresponding recognition of cost of sales for the delivere d
units is based upon our estimates of costs to be incurred for

Results of Operations

the total contract. Under this approach, we compare
estimated costs to complete an entire contract to total net
revenue for the term of the contract to arrive at an estimated
g ross margin percentage for each contract. Each month, 
the estimated gross margin percentage is applied to the
cumulative net revenue recognized on the contract to arr i v e
at cost of sales for the period. Management reviews these
estimates monthly and the effect of any change in the
estimated gross margin percentage for a contract is re f l e c t e d
in cost of sales in the period in which the change is known.
Such changes to these estimates have not been material to
our quarterly results of operations during the three year
period ended December 31, 2001. If increases in pro j e c t e d
costs-to-complete are sufficient to create a loss contract, the
e n t i re estimated loss is charged to operations in the period
the loss first becomes known. Additionally, our re s e rve for
excess and obsolete inventory is primarily based upon
f o recasted demand for our products and any change to the
re s e rve arising from forecast revisions is reflected in cost of
sales in the period the revision is made.

The complexity of the estimation process and all issues
related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inhere n t
with the application of the percentage of completion, units of
d e l i v e ry method of accounting affect the amounts re p o rt e d
in our financial statements. A number of internal and
e x t e rnal factors affect our cost of sales estimates, including
labor rate and efficiency variances, revised estimates of
w a rranty costs, estimated future material prices and
customer specification and testing re q u i rement changes. 
If our business conditions were diff e rent, or if we used
d i ff e rent assumptions in the application of this and other
accounting policies, it is likely that materially diff e re n t
amounts would be re p o rted in our financial statements.

The following table sets forth certain data from our consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, expressed as a percentage of net re v e n u e :

Years ended December 31,
Net revenue:

Electronics Group
Industrial Group

Total net revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Amortization of intangible assets
Special charges

Operating income

Net income

26/27 Sypris Annual Report 2001

2001

81.4%
18.6
100.0

82.9

17.1

10.3
1.2
0.5
—

5.1%

2.5%

2000

84.1%
15.9
100.0

81.4

18.6

12.4
1.6
0.7
1.4

2.5%

1.5%

1999

81.6%
18.4
100.0

77.8

22.2

11.5
3.2
0.5
—

7.0%

4.7%

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2000

Net Revenue. Net revenue was $254.6 million in 2001, an
i n c rease of $38.0 million, or 17.6%, from $216.6 million in
2000. Backlog at December 31, 2001 was $162.3 million, an
i n c rease of $1.5 million from $160.8 million at December
31, 2000. Backlog for our Electronics Group and Industrial
G roup at December 31, 2001 was $118.5 million and
$ 4 3 . 8 million, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Net revenue for our Electronics Group in 2001 was

$ 2 0 7 . 3 million, an increase of $25.2 million, or 13.8%, 
f rom $182.1 million in 2000. The increase in net re v e n u e
was primarily from contracts with aerospace & defense
customers for manufacturing services, which generated 
an increase of $28.7 million in 2001 over the prior year.
Other outsourced services accounted for an increase in 
net revenue of $0.5 million during 2001. Product sales
accounted for a decrease in net revenue of $4.0 m i l l i o n
during 2001, primarily due to reduced sales quantities for
data systems pro d u c t s .

Net revenue for our Industrial Group in 2001 was
$ 4 7 . 3 million, an increase of $12.8 million, or 37.5%, fro m
$ 3 4 . 5 million in 2000. During May 2001, we acquire d
c e rtain manufacturing assets and inventory from Dana for
a p p roximately $11.5 million in cash. The assets are used 
to produce fully machined, heavy-duty truck axle shafts
and other drive train components for integration into
subassemblies produced for leading truck manufacture r s .
This business generated outsourced services revenue of
$ 1 7 . 7 million during 2001. Excluding the acquisition, the
Industrial Gro u p ’s net revenue declined $4.9 million in 2001
f rom the prior year. The decrease in net revenue was
primarily due to a decline in outsourced services pro v i d e d
to customers in the heavy-duty truck market. Unfavorable
market conditions that arose during the second half of
2000 for heavy-duty truck production resulted in an
i n d u s t ry-wide market decrease of approximately 44% fro m
1999 to 2001 and reduced the volume of axles we supplied
to that market. We expect demand in the heavy-duty tru c k
market to remain weak during 2002; however, furt h e r
significant declines in demand are not anticipated. During
2002, we expect to ramp-up production for new and cert a i n
existing customers on additional forging and machining
equipment we installed during 2001. The incre a s e d
p roduction volume from these opportunities, combined
with the full year impact of the acquisition from Dana, is
expected to result in higher revenue for our Industrial
G roup in 2002 as compared to 2001.

G ross Pro f i t . G ross profit in 2001 was $43.5 million, 
an increase of $3.2 million, or 8.0%, from $40.3 million in
2000. Gross margin in 2001 declined to 17.1% from 18.6%
in 2000.

G ross profit for our Electronics Group in 2001 was
$ 3 7 . 4 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.1%, fro m
$ 3 6 . 3 million in 2000. The increase in manufacturing
s e rvices revenue generated an increase in gross profit of
$ 3 . 8 million, while gross profit from other outsourc e d
s e rvices decreased $0.6 million. Gross margin in 2001
declined to 18.0% from 19.9% in 2000. Manufacturing
s e rvices comprised approximately 59% of our Electro n i c s
G ro u p ’s revenue in 2001 as compared to appro x i m a t e l y
51% in 2000. Gross margin from manufacturing serv i c e s
i m p roved slightly over the prior year; however, since 
g ross margin on manufacturing services is lower than
other outsourced services, the change in revenue mix
contributed to the decrease in gross margin. Another factor
in the gross margin decline was a slight decrease in gro s s
m a rgin on other outsourced services, primarily due to
adverse economic conditions impacting demand and
pricing for certain services provided to our customers.
G ross profit from product sales decreased $2.1 m i l l i o n
during 2001, primarily due to reduced demand for cert a i n
p roduct off e r i n g s .

G ross profit for our Industrial Group in 2001 was
$ 6 . 1 million, an increase of $2.1 million or 52.5% fro m
$ 4 . 0 million in 2000. Excluding the acquisition from 
Dana, gross profit declined $0.9 million in 2001 primarily
due to the downturn of the heavy-duty truck market. 
The reduction in demand and corresponding impact on
shipments occurred as our organizational infrastru c t u re 
to support future growth plans was being developed. The
i n c reased cost stru c t u re associated with the additional
people and systems re q u i red to meet future contractual
re q u i rements and the underabsorption of overhead due 
to the volume decline resulted in a decline in our gro s s
m a rgin, excluding the impact of the operation acquire d
f rom Dana, to 10.6% in 2001, as compared to 11.7% for 
the prior year. Gross margin for our Industrial Gro u p
during 2001 including the operation acquired from Dana
was 13.0%.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general
and administrative expense in 2001 was $26.1 million, or
10.3% of net revenue, as compared to $26.9 million, or
12.4% of net revenue in 2000. Although net re v e n u e
i n c reased 17.6% from 2000 to 2001 and the acquisition
f rom Dana added approximately $1.0 million to selling,
general and administrative expense during 2001, our total
selling, general and administrative spending decreased by

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

$0.8 million, or 2.8%. The decline in selling, general and
administrative expense was primarily attributable to
d e c reased selling expenses and commissions related to
lower product sales for our Electronics Group, decre a s e d
marketing costs and cost reductions in both our Electro n i c s
G roup and Industrial Group in response to the general
weakness in the U.S. economy.

R e s e a rch and Development. R e s e a rch and

development expense in 2001 was $3.1 million, or 1.2% 
of net revenue, as compared to $3.6 million, or 1.6% of 
net revenue in 2000. The decrease in re s e a rch and
development expense was attributable to our Electro n i c s
G roup, and was related to the quantity and timing of new
p roduct releases for the data systems product lines and the
i n c reased utilization of strategic alliances with suppliers for
p roduct development.

A m o rtization of Intangible Assets. A m o rtization of
intangible assets in 2001 was $1.3 million, a decrease of
$ 0 . 1 million, or 7.5% compared to $1.4 million in 2000.

Special Charg e s . Special charges of $2.9 million 
w e re recognized during 2000 for activities related to the
consolidation of certain operations within our Electro n i c s
G roup. The consolidation activities were completed in 2000
and no such charges were recognized in 2001.

I n t e rest Expense, Net. I n t e rest expense in 2001 was

$ 4 . 1 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 1.9%, fro m
$ 4 . 0 million in 2000. Interest expense attributable to
i n c reased borrowings during 2001 was offset by a
reduction in interest rates and the capitalization of intere s t
i n c u rred on our Industrial Gro u p ’s capital expenditure
p rogram. Our weighted average debt outstanding
i n c reased to approximately $74.5 million during 2001 fro m
a p p roximately $58.7 million in 2000. This increase re f l e c t e d
the $11.5 million acquisition from Dana made by our
Industrial Group in May 2001 and capital expenditure s
during 2000 and 2001 to support new business
o p p o rtunities. The weighted average interest rate in 2001
was approximately 7.1% as compared to appro x i m a t e l y
8.3% for the prior year. Capitalized interest in 2001 was
$ 1 . 8 million as compared to $0.9 million in 2000, and is
expected to be insignificant in 2002 as the related capital
p rojects have been substantially completed as of 
December 31, 2001.

Income Ta x e s . Income tax expense was $2.9 million in
2001 as compared to an income tax benefit of $1.4 million
in 2000. The effective tax rate in 2001 was 31.4%. The
e ffective tax rate for 2001 and the income tax benefit in
2000 reflect re s e a rch and development tax credits, fore i g n
sales corporation tax benefits and a reduction in the

C o m p a n y ’s valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The
reduction in the valuation allowance for 2001 and 2000 was
$0.3 million and $3.0 million, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 1999

Net Revenue. Net revenue was $216.6 million in 2000, an
i n c rease of $14.5 million, or 7.1%, from $202.1 million in
1999. Backlog at December 31, 2000 was $160.8 million, an
i n c rease of $33.8 million from $127.0 million at December
31, 1999. Backlog for our Electronics Group and Industrial
G roup at December 31, 2000 was $143.2 million and
$ 1 7 . 6 million, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Net revenue for our Electronics Group in 2000 was
$ 1 8 2 . 1 million, an increase of $17.2 million or 10.4% fro m
$ 1 6 4 . 9 million in 1999. The increase in net revenue was
generated primarily from new contracts for manufacturing
s e rvices and the expansion of calibration services re s u l t i n g
f rom the acquisition from Lucent. Production on several
new manufacturing service contracts, mainly with
a e rospace & defense customers, began to ramp-up during
2000, generating a $16.2 million increase in revenue. The
a c q u i red calibration business added a fleet of mobile
calibration labs to the Electronics Gro u p ’s serv i c e
capabilities and accounted for an $8.4 million increase 
in revenue during 2000. The increase in service re v e n u e
was partially offset by a $6.5 million decrease in pro d u c t
revenue, primarily due to reduced sales quantities for the
E l e c t ronics Gro u p ’s data systems products, which began to
decline in 1999 and continued to decline throughout 2000.
The reduced level of demand reflects an overall market
decline and increased competition. Other outsourc e d
s e rvices and product sales accounted for a net $0.9 m i l l i o n
d e c rease in net revenue during 2000.

Net revenue for our Industrial Group was $34.5 m i l l i o n ,

a decrease of $2.7 million, or 7.3%, from $37.2 million in
1999. The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to a
decline in outsourced services provided to customers in 
the heavy-duty truck market. Market conditions in Nort h
America for heavy-duty truck production were negatively
impacted by oil prices, interest rates and an excess
i n v e n t o ry of new and used trucks, resulting in an overall
market decrease of approximately 40%. This reduced the
volume of forged truck axles provided under manufacturing
s e rvice agreements and accounted for a $4.0 m i l l i o n
d e c rease in net revenue, the majority of which occurre d
during the second half of 2000. Revenue derived fro m
manufacturing services in other markets increased by

28/29 Sypris Annual Report 2001

$ 0 . 5 million and fabricated product sales increased by
$ 0 . 8 million. During 1999 and 2000, our Industrial Gro u p
invested approximately $22.6 million to expand its forg i n g
capacity and add new machining capabilities.

G ross Pro f i t . G ross profit in 2000 was $40.3 million, a

d e c rease of $4.6 million, or 10.3%, from $44.9 million in
1999. Gross margin in 2000 was 18.6% of net revenue, as
c o m p a red to 22.2% of net revenue in 1999.

G ross profit for our Electronics Group in 2000 was
$ 3 6 . 3 million, or 19.9% of net revenue, as compared to
$ 3 7 . 9 million, or 23.0% of net revenue in 1999. The
$ 1 . 6 million decrease in gross profit in 2000 was primarily
due to volume reductions and increased costs on data
systems products and increased costs on manufacturing
s e rvice contracts. Volume declines for data systems
p roducts, related underabsorbed overhead costs and
manufacturing inefficiencies arising from the transfer of
p roduction following the consolidation of two facilities
during the first half of 2000 contributed to a $5.0 m i l l i o n
decline in gross profit. This reduction was substantially
o ffset by increased gross profit from the growth in the
manufacturing and calibration service revenue. The
additional volume generated increased gross profit of
$ 4 . 4 million which was offset by increased costs of
$ 1 . 0 million associated with the following three primary
factors. First, shortages and extended lead times for the
p u rchase of certain electronic components resulted in
manufacturing inefficiencies due to the unpredictability of
scheduling receipts of allocated components from vendors.
Second, the number of new program start-ups incre a s e d
substantially during 2000 as compared to the prior year.
Manufacturing inefficiencies on new programs generally
result in lower gross margins during the start-up phase
and margins typically improve as the programs mature .
T h i rd, additional costs incurred to make the necessary
investments in people, equipment and processes to
s u p p o rt the re c o rd level of backlog also reduced gro s s
p rofit in 2000.

G ross profit for our Industrial Group in 2000 was
$ 4 . 0 million, or 11.7% of net revenue, as compared to
$ 7 . 0 million, or 19.0% of net revenue in 1999. The
$ 3 . 0 million decrease in gross profit was primarily due 
to the downturn of the heavy-duty truck market. The
reduction in demand and corresponding impact on
shipments occurred as the organizational infrastru c t u re 
to support future growth plans was being developed. The
i n c reased cost stru c t u re associated with the additional
people and systems re q u i red to meet future contractual
re q u i rements and the underabsorption of overhead due to

the volume decline resulted in low gross margin levels,
p a rticularly during the second half of 2000.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general
and administrative expense in 2000 was $26.9 million, or
12.4% of net revenue, as compared to $23.4 million, or
11.5% of net revenue in 1999. The increase in selling,
general and administrative expense was attributable
primarily to our Electronics Group, which re p o rted an
i n c rease of $2.9 million. Investments in the org a n i z a t i o n a l
i n f r a s t ru c t u re as discussed above also include cert a i n
selling, general and administrative expenses, the majority
of which were within our Electronics Group. Selling
expenses incurred for marketing and bid and pro p o s a l
activities during 2000 exceeded prior year amounts and
w e re a contributing factor to the increased orders and net
revenue in 2000.

R e s e a rch and Development. R e s e a rch and

development expense in 2000 was $3.6 million, or 1.6% 
of net revenue, as compared to $6.4 million, or 3.2% of 
net revenue in 1999. This decrease was attributable to our
E l e c t ronics Group, and relates to the quantity and timing 
of new product releases for the data systems product lines
and the utilization of strategic alliances with suppliers for
p roduct development.

A m o rtization of Intangible Assets. A m o rtization of

intangible assets in 2000 was $1.4 million, an increase of
$ 0 . 4 million, or 45.6% compared to $1.0 million in 1999.
This increase resulted from the amortization of goodwill
re c o rded in connection with the acquisition from Lucent.

Special Charg e s . Special charges of $2.9 million were

recognized during 2000 for activities related to the
consolidation of certain operations within our Electro n i c s
G roup. Operations for the data systems product lines have
been conducted at two facilities since the November 1997
acquisition that expanded this business. Although several
consolidation actions were implemented immediately
following this acquisition, management identified potential
cost savings in 2000 that could be realized through the
elimination of redundant manufacturing operations and
s t a ffing of functional areas between the two facilities. The
consolidation activities were substantially completed
during the first nine months of 2000. The special charg e s
i n c u rred for these activities include workforce re d u c t i o n s ,
facilities re a rrangement and relocation expenses, and
employment costs related to the transfer of pro d u c t i o n .
I n t e rest Expense, Net. I n t e rest expense in 2000 was

$ 4 . 0 million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 133%, fro m
$ 1 . 7 million in 1999. The increase in interest expense was
primarily due to an increase in the weighted average debt

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

M a n a g e m e n t ’s Discussion and Analysis

outstanding coupled with an increase in interest rates. Our
weighted average debt outstanding more than doubled to
a p p roximately $58.7 million in 2000 from appro x i m a t e l y
$ 2 8 . 4 million in 1999. This increase resulted primarily fro m
the acquisition from Lucent, working capital funding
related to the increase in revenue and order backlog and
capital expenditures during 1999 and 2000 to support new
business opportunities. The weighted average interest 
rate for 2000 was approximately 8.3% as compared to
a p p roximately 6.1% for the prior year. The year-to-year 
rate change includes an increase in the margin paid on
outstanding borrowings of approximately 100 basis points
under the terms of the Company’s credit agre e m e n t .

Income Ta x e s . An income tax benefit of appro x i m a t e l y

$ 1 . 4 million was recognized during 2000 as compared to
income tax expense of $3.1 million during 1999. The tax
benefit during 2000 was primarily due to a $3.0 m i l l i o n
reduction in our valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets. Certain issues related to our consolidated federal
taxable income were resolved during 2000, which gave 
rise to the elimination of the valuation allowance for
d e f e rred tax assets related to federal income tax temporary
d i ff e rences. We also recognized a tax benefit during 2000
of approximately $0.3 million for re s e a rch and
development tax credits. The provision for income taxes 
in 1999 included a reduction in the valuation allowance 
on deferred tax assets of $1.9 million and a benefit for
re s e a rch and development tax credits of $0.6 m i l l i o n .

Liquidity, Capital Resources and 
Financial Condition

Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.5 m i l l i o n
in 2001, as compared to $8.1 million in 2000. Accounts
receivable increased by $8.5 million, primarily due to
i n c reased revenue and the acquisition from Dana
completed in May 2001. Inventory increased by
$ 3 . 5 million, excluding the fair value of inventory acquire d
in the Dana transaction. Accounts payable increased $3.6
million, excluding the impact of open accounts payable 
at each year-end related to capital expenditures. The
i n c reases in inventory and accounts payable are primarily
attributable to the revenue increase in our business.

Net cash used in investing activities was $32.9 m i l l i o n

in 2001 as compared to $14.9 million for the prior year. 
The increase was primarily attributable to the $11.5 million
acquisition from Dana. Capital expenditures for our
E l e c t ronics Group and Industrial Group totaled $7.9 m i l l i o n
and $19.5 million, re s p e c t i v e l y, in 2001. Capital

e x p e n d i t u res for our Electronics Group were principally
comprised of manufacturing, assembly and test
equipment. Our Industrial Gro u p ’s capital expenditure s
included new forging and machining equipment to
i n c rease and expand the range of production capabilities.
Our Industrial Group invested $19.5 million, $15.5 m i l l i o n
and $7.1 million during 2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y,
in facilities, equipment and systems to support our curre n t
and anticipated growth in the truck components &
assemblies market. We substantially completed the
investments for this growth during 2001, which pro v i d e s
us with the capacity to serve the re q u i rements of our
existing multi-year contracts with ArvinMeritor and Dana
and allows us the opportunity to undertake additional larg e
contracts from new customers. We completed sale and
leaseback transactions with members of our bank gro u p
during each of the last two years for certain machinery and
equipment. Proceeds from the sale of these assets in 2001
and 2000 were $5.4 million and $9.3 million, re s p e c t i v e l y.
We entered into operating leases for the related assets for
periods ranging from five to nine years. We also re c e i v e d
$1.4 million in 2001 for the sale of certain assets by the
E l e c t ronics Gro u p .

Net cash provided by financing activities was
$ 2 3 . 0 million during 2001 as compared to $11.1 m i l l i o n
during the prior year. Our outstanding debt incre a s e d
$ 2 2 . 5 million during 2001 to $87.5 million, primarily to fund
the acquisition from Dana and capital expenditure s .

We had total availability for borrowings and letters of
c redit under the revolving credit facility of $12.5 million at
December 31, 2001, which, when combined with our
u n restricted cash balance of $13.2 million, provided for
total cash and borrowing capacity of $25.7 m i l l i o n .
Maximum borrowings on the revolving credit facility are
$ 1 0 0 . 0 million, subject to a $15.0 million limit for letters 
of credit. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
may be used to finance working capital re q u i re m e n t s ,
acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including
capital expenditures. Most acquisitions re q u i re the
a p p roval of our bank gro u p .

Our credit agreement contains customary aff i rm a t i v e

and negative covenants, including financial covenants
requiring the maintenance of specified fixed charge and
leverage ratios and minimum levels of net worth. At
December 31, 2001, we were in compliance with these
covenants and retained earnings of $15.4 million were
u n restricted. The credit agreement is secured by
substantially all of our assets, including but not limited 

30/31 Sypris Annual Report 2001

to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1,
2001, we will apply the new accounting rules beginning
J a n u a ry 1, 2002. We will perf o rm the first of the re q u i re d
i m p a i rment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets as of January 1, 2002. We currently do not expect
any significant loss as a result of the impairment tests. We
will be re q u i red to test the value of our goodwill at least
a n n u a l l y. These tests will involve estimates related to the
fair market value of the business with which the goodwill
is associated. We anticipate that substantially all
a m o rtization of intangible assets as a charge to earn i n g s
will be eliminated beginning January 1, 2002.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk

On July 26, 2001, we entered into interest rate swap
a g reements with a syndicate of banks that eff e c t i v e l y
c o n v e rt a portion of our variable rate debt to a fixed rate of
4.52%, excluding our applicable margin, through July 2003.
We entered into interest rate swap agreements as a means
to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on future
i n t e rest expense. Approximately 34% ($30.0 million) of our
outstanding debt was covered under the interest rate swap
a g reements at December 31, 2001. We are exposed to
financial market risks, including changes in interest rates
and foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the
b o rrowings included in the interest rate swap agre e m e n t s ,
all other borrowings under our credit agreement bear
i n t e rest at a variable rate based on the prime rate, the
London Interbank Off e red Rate, or certain alternative 
s h o rt - t e rm rates, plus a margin (2.0% at December 31,
2001) based upon our leverage ratio. An increase in
i n t e rest rates of 100 basis points would result in additional
i n t e rest expense of approximately $0.6 million on an
annualized basis, based upon our debt outstanding at
December 31, 2001. The vast majority of our transactions
a re denominated in U.S. dollars. As such, fluctuations in
f o reign currency exchange rates have historically had little
impact on us. Inflation has not been a significant factor in
our operations in any of the periods presented and it is not
expected to affect operations in the future .

to accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and re a l
estate, and is also guaranteed by our subsidiaries. The
asset collateralization re q u i rement may be eliminated after
June 2002 in the event we achieve certain financial ratios
and remain in compliance with all covenants.

Our principal commitments at December 31, 2001

consisted of repayments of borrowings under the cre d i t
a g reement and obligations under operating leases for
c e rtain of our real pro p e rty and equipment. We also had
p u rchase commitments totaling approximately $5.0 m i l l i o n
at December 31, 2001, primarily for manufacturing
equipment. During 2001 and 2000, we financed
a p p roximately $26.3 million of machinery and equipment
t h rough operating leases with our bank group. Our
minimum commitments on operating leases with initial or
remaining terms greater than one year, including all re a l
and personal pro p e rty leases, total $7.0 million for 2002,
$22.0 million for 2003 through 2006, and $9.2 million for
2007 and there a f t e r.

We believe that sufficient re s o u rces will be available to

satisfy our cash re q u i rements for at least the next twelve
months. Cash re q u i rements for periods beyond the next
twelve months depend on our pro f i t a b i l i t y, ability to
manage working capital re q u i rements and rate of gro w t h .
If we make significant acquisitions or if working capital and
capital expenditure re q u i rements exceed expected levels
during the next twelve months or in subsequent periods,
we may re q u i re additional external sources of capital.
T h e re can be no assurance that any additional re q u i re d
financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt
or equity financings or otherwise, or that if such financing
is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us. If
adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our
business, results of operations and financial condition
could be adversely aff e c t e d .

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard s
( “ S FAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and 
No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under
the new rules, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually
for impairment. Separable intangible assets that are 
not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to 
be amortized over their useful lives. The amort i z a t i o n
p rovisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and
intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With re s p e c t

Consolidated Income Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands, except for per share data)

NET REVENUE

Outsourced services
Products

Total net revenue

COST OF SALES

Outsourced services
Products

Total cost of sales

Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Amortization of intangible assets
Special charges

Operating income

Interest expense, net
Other income, net

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense (benefit)

Net income

Net income per common share:

Basic
Diluted

Shares used in computing per common share amounts:

Basic
Diluted

2001

2000

1999

$ 209,874
44,766

$ 168,216
48,355

$ 150,139
51,991

254,640

216,571

202,130

181,818
29,275

145,059
31,199

127,153
30,028

211,093

176,258

157,181

43,547

26,134
3,054
1,329
—

13,030

4,111
(358)

9,277

2,910

40,313

26,881
3,574
1,436
2,945

5,477

4,035
(344)

1,786

(1,398)

44,949

23,388
6,409
986
—

14,166

1,730
(219)

12,655

3,099

$

6,367

$

3,184

$

9,556

$
$

0.65
0.63

$
$

0.33
0.32

$
$

1.00
0.97

9,828
10,028

9,671
9,964

9,515
9,861

December 31,

(in thousands, except for share data)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Inventory, net
Other current assets

Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net

Intangible assets, net

Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 989,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
Series A Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 11,000 shares authorized; 

no shares issued

Common stock, non-voting, par value $.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 

no shares issued

Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 9,898,675 and 9,709,669

shares issued and outstanding in 2001 and 2000, respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Total stockholders’ equity

2001

2000

$ 13,232
39,758
60,574
7,991

$ 14,674
31,896
51,055
7,695

121,555

105,320

70,452

15,926

3,511

54,317

17,154

2,331

$ 211,444

$ 179,122

$ 26,828
19,902
7,500

54,230

80,000
7,094

$ 25,670
18,548
2,500

46,718

62,500
5,699

141,324

114,917

—

—

—

99
25,490
46,427
(1,896)

70,120

—

—

—

97
24,401
40,060
(353)

64,205

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

32/33 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 211,444

$ 179,122

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow s

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash 

provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
Provision for doubtful accounts
Other noncash charges

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

Accounts receivable
Inventory
Other current assets
Accounts payable
Accrued and other liabilities

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Capital expenditures
Proceeds from sale of assets
Purchase of the net assets of acquired entities
Changes in nonoperating assets and liabilities

$ 6,367

$ 3,184

$ 9,556

9,856
479
432
122
59

(8,474)
(3,519)
(416)
3,648
(83)

8,471

(27,623)
6,816
(11,486)
(650)

9,351
(2,478)
453
18
202

(8,121)
(2,046)
(344)
9,274
(1,361)

8,132

(23,886)
9,292
—
(351)

7,582
(645)
446
(129)
133

2,619
(11,277)
(1,704)
(1,997)
(6,652)

(2,068)

(14,443)
14
(11,642)
(343)

Net cash used in investing activities

(32,943)

(14,945)

(26,414)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net increase in debt under revolving credit agreements
Payments on long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of common stock

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

22,500
—
530

23,030

(1,442)

14,674

10,600
—
481

11,081

4,268

10,406

28,280
(2,463)
684

26,501

(1,981)

12,387

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$ 13,232

$ 14,674

$ 10,406

2001

2000

1999

(in thousands, except for share data)

Consolidated Statements of Stock h o l d e r s ’ E q u i t y

Common Stock
A m o u n t

S h a r e s

A d d i t i o n a l
P a i d - I n
C a p i t a l

R e t a i n e d
E a r n i n g s

A c c u m u l a t e d
O t h e r
C o m p r e h e n s i v e
I n c o m e
( L o s s )

To t a l
S t o c k h o l d e r s ’
E q u i t y

Balance at January 1, 1999

9,450,593

$ 95

$ 23,238

$ 27,320

$ (1,294)

$ 49,359

Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension liability
Comprehensive income

Issuance of shares under 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Exercise of stock options

—
—
—

15,600
123,021

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1999

9,589,214

Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension liability
Comprehensive income (loss)

Issuance of shares under 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Exercise of stock options

—
—
—

35,290
85,165

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000

9,709,669

Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension 
liability, net of tax of $828

Change in fair value of interest rate 

swap agreements, net of tax of $309

Comprehensive income (loss)

Issuance of shares under 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Exercise of stock options

—

—

—
—

52,206
136,800

—
—
—

—
1

96

—
—
—

—
1

97

—

—

—
—

1
1

—
—
—

99
584

9,556
—
9,556

—
—

—
1,221
1,221

—
—

9,556
1,221
10,777

99
585

23,921

36,876

(73)

60,820

—
—
—

273
207

3,184
—
3,184

—
—

—
(280)
(280)

—
—

3,184
(280)
2,904

273
208

24,401

40,060

(353)

64,205

—

—

—
—

256
833

6,367

—

6,367

—

(1,124)

(1,124)

—
6,367

(419)
(1,543)

(419)
4,824

—
—

—
—

257
834

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2001

9,898,675

$ 99

$ 25,490

$ 46,427

$ (1,896)

$ 70,120

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

34/35 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.  Organization and Significant 
Accounting Policies

Consolidation Policy
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Sypris” or the
“Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.

The first-in, first-out method was used for determining the
cost of inventory excluding contract inventory and cert a i n
other inventory, which was determined using the last-in,
first-out method (see Note 5). The Company’s re s e rve for
excess and obsolete inventory is primarily based upon
f o recasted demand for its product sales, and any change to
the re s e rve arising from forecast revisions is reflected in
cost of sales in the period the revision is made.

N a t u re of Business
Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and
specialty products. The Company perf o rms a wide range of
manufacturing, engineering, design, testing and other
technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-sourc e
contracts with major companies and government agencies
in the markets for aerospace & defense electronics, tru c k
components & assemblies, and for users of test &
m e a s u rement equipment.

As of January 1, 2002, the Company changed the
name of its four major operating subsidiaries as part of a
c o m p rehensive branding initiative. The new names of the
four subsidiaries are: Sypris Data Systems, Inc., form e r l y
M e t rum-Datatape, Inc.; Sypris Electronics, LLC, form e r l y
G roup Technologies Corporation; Sypris Technologies, Inc.,
f o rmerly Tube Tu rns Technologies, Inc.; and Sypris Test &
M e a s u rement, Inc., formerly Bell Technologies, Inc.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
c o n f o rmity with generally accepted accounting principles
re q u i res management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts re p o rted in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be
cash equivalents.

I n v e n t o ry
Contract inventory is stated at actual production costs,
reduced by the cost of units for which revenue has been
recognized. Gross contract inventory is considered work in
p rocess. Pro g ress payments under long-term contracts are
specified in the contracts as a percentage of cost and are
liquidated as contract items are completed and shipped.
Other inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market.

P ro p e rt y, Plant and Equipment
P ro p e rt y, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of
cost. Depreciation of pro p e rt y, plant and equipment is
generally computed using the straight-line method over
their estimated economic lives. For land impro v e m e n t s ,
buildings and building improvements, the estimated
economic life is generally 40 years. Estimated economic
lives range from three to fifteen years for machinery,
equipment, furn i t u re and fixtures. Leasehold
i m p rovements are amortized over the respective lease
t e rm using the straight-line method. Expenditures for
maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are
expensed as incurred. Major renewals and impro v e m e n t s
a re capitalized.

I n t e rest cost is capitalized for qualifying assets during

the period in which the asset is being installed and
p re p a red for its intended use. Capitalized interest cost is
a m o rtized on the same basis as the related depre c i a t i o n .
Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2001
and 2000 was $1,763,000 and $910,000, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Intangible Assets
Costs in excess of net assets of businesses acquire d
(“goodwill”), patents, product drawings and similar
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated
economic lives. Goodwill is being amortized over a period
of fifteen years (see Notes 2 and 7). Other intangible assets
a re being amortized over periods ranging from five to
fifteen years, using the straight-line method.

I m p a i rment of Long-lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including
goodwill, for impairment and assesses their re c o v e r a b i l i t y
based upon anticipated future cash flows. If facts and
c i rcumstances lead the Company’s management to believe
that the cost of one of its assets may be impaired, the
Company will evaluate the extent to which that cost is
recoverable by comparing the future undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be associated with that asset to the
a s s e t ’s carrying amount and write down that carry i n g

36/37 Sypris Annual Report 2001

amount to market value, or discounted cash flow value, to
the extent necessary.

s u fficient to create a loss contract, the entire estimated 
loss is charged to operations in the period the loss first
becomes known.

Revenue Recognition
A portion of the Company’s business is conducted under
l o n g - t e rm, fixed-price contracts with aerospace and
defense companies and agencies of the U.S. G o v e rn m e n t .
Contract revenue is included in the consolidated income
statements as units are completed and shipped using the
units of delivery, percentage of completion method of
accounting. The costs attributed to contract revenue are
based upon the estimated average costs of all units to be
shipped. The cumulative average costs of units shipped to
date are adjusted through current operations as estimates
of future costs to complete change (see “Contract
Accounting” below).

Revenue recognized under the percentage of
completion method of accounting totaled $134,478,000,
$105,535,000 and $90,819,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y.
Substantially all such amounts were accounted for 
under the units of delivery method. All other revenue is
recognized as product is shipped and title passes, or when
s e rvices are re n d e re d .

Contract Accounting
For long-term contracts, the Company capitalizes in
i n v e n t o ry direct material, direct labor and factory overh e a d
as incurred. The Company also capitalizes certain general
and administrative costs for estimating and bidding on
contracts awarded (of which approximately $210,000
remained in inventory at December 31, 2001 and 2000).
Selling costs are expensed as incurred. Costs to complete
l o n g - t e rm contracts are estimated on a monthly basis.
Estimated margins at completion are applied to cumulative
contract revenue to arrive at costs charged to operations.

Accounting for long-term contracts under the
p e rcentage of completion method involves substantial
estimation processes, including determining the estimated
cost to complete a contract. As contracts may re q u i re
p e rf o rmance over several accounting periods, form a l
detailed cost-to-complete estimates are perf o rmed and
updated monthly via perf o rmance re p o rts. Management’s
estimates of costs-to-complete change due to internal and
e x t e rnal factors, such as labor rate and eff i c i e n c y
variances, revised estimates of warranty costs, estimated
f u t u re material prices and customer specification and
testing re q u i rement changes. Changes in estimated costs
a re reflected in gross profit in the period in which they are
known. If increases in projected costs-to-complete are

P roduct Wa rranty Costs
The provision for estimated warranty costs is re c o rded at
the time of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect actual
experience. The accrued liability for warranty costs is
included in the caption “Accrued liabilities” in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially expose the
Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of
accounts receivable. The Company’s customer base
consists of various departments or agencies of the
U . S . G o v e rnment, aerospace and defense companies
under contract with the U.S. G o v e rnment and a number 
of customers in diverse industries across geographic are a s .
The Company perf o rms periodic credit evaluations of its
customers’ financial condition and does not re q u i re
collateral on its commercial accounts receivable. Cre d i t
losses are provided for in the financial statements and
consistently have been within management’s expectations.
A p p roximately 41% of accounts receivable outstanding at
December 31, 2001 are due from three of the Company’s
l a rgest customers.

The Company recognized revenue from contracts 

with the U.S. G o v e rnment and its agencies of
a p p roximately $40,046,000, $45,467,000 and $53,244,000
during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999,
re s p e c t i v e l y. The Company’s largest customers for the year
ended December 31, 2001 were Raytheon Company and
Honeywell International, Inc., which re p re s e n t e d
a p p roximately 21% and 11%, re s p e c t i v e l y, of the
C o m p a n y ’s total net revenue. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, the Company’s largest customer 
was Raytheon Company, which re p resented appro x i m a t e l y
15% of the Company’s total net revenue. No other single
customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 or 1999.

Stock Based Compensation
Stock options are granted under various stock
compensation programs to employees and independent
d i rectors (see Note 13). The Company accounts for stock
option grants in accordance with Accounting Principles
B o a rd Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees” (“APB 2 5 ” ) .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Derivative Financial Instru m e n t s
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard s
( “ S FAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instru m e n t s
and Hedging Activities” and issued its amendments,
Statements No. 137 and 138, in June 1999 and June 2000,
re s p e c t i v e l y. SFAS No. 133 re q u i res the Company to
recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair
value through income. If the derivative is a hedge,
depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of derivatives are either offset against the change in
fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments
t h rough earnings or recognized in other compre h e n s i v e
income until the hedged item is recognized in earn i n g s .
The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value
must be recognized currently in earn i n g s .

Adoption of Recently Issued Accounting Standard
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under the
new rules, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets
a re no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for
i m p a i rment. Separable intangible assets that are not
deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be
a m o rtized over their useful lives. The amort i z a t i o n
p rovisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and
intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With re s p e c t
to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1,
2001, the Company will apply the new accounting ru l e s
beginning January 1, 2002. The Company will perf o rm the
first of the re q u i red impairment tests of goodwill and
indefinite lived intangible assets as of January 1, 2002. The
Company currently does not expect any significant loss as
a result of the impairment tests. The Company will be
re q u i red to test the value of its goodwill at least annually.
These tests will involve estimates related to the fair market
value of the business with which the goodwill is
associated. The Company anticipates that substantially all
a m o rtization of intangible assets as a charge to earn i n g s
will be eliminated beginning January 1, 2002.

Note 2.  Acquisitions

subassemblies and is included with Sypris Technologies 
in the Industrial Group. The transaction was accounted 
for as a purchase, in which the purchase price of
$11,500,000 was allocated based on the fair values of 
the assets and liabilities acquired. The results of 
operations of the acquired business have been included 
in the consolidated financial statements since the
acquisition date. The acquisition was financed by the
C o m p a n y ’s Credit Agre e m e n t .

During 1999, the Company completed two
transactions in which it acquired the assets of the 
related businesses. The transactions were accounted 
for as purchases, in which the combined purchase price 
of $11,642,000 was allocated based on the fair values 
of assets acquired, with the excess amount allocated 
to goodwill, which totaled $6,607,000. The results of
operations of the acquired businesses have been included
in the consolidated financial statements since the
respective acquisition dates. The acquisitions were
financed by the Company’s Credit Agre e m e n t .

Note 3.  Special Charges

Special charges of $2,945,000 were recognized during the
year ended December 31, 2000 for activities related to the
consolidation of certain operations within the Electro n i c s
G roup. The special charges incurred and paid during 2000
include workforce reductions, related severance and other
benefit costs of $1,211,000, facilities re a rrangement and
relocation costs of $480,000, and employment costs 
related to the transfer of production of $1,254,000. The
w o r k f o rce reductions resulted in the termination of 48
employees involved in manufacturing, engineering, sales
and administrative activities during 2000.

Note 4.  Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following
(in thousands):

December 31,
C o m m e rc i a l
U.S. Govern m e n t

Allowance for doubtful accounts

2 0 0 1
$ 3 4 , 6 5 8
5 , 8 7 5
4 0 , 5 3 3
( 7 7 5 )
$ 3 9 , 7 5 8

2 0 0 0
$ 2 6 , 2 6 2
6 , 3 1 3
3 2 , 5 7 5
( 6 7 9 )
$ 3 1 , 8 9 6

On May 31, 2001, the Company acquired certain assets and
liabilities of the Marion Forge plant from Dana Corporation.
The business produces fully machined, heavy-duty tru c k
axle shafts and other drive components for integration into

Accounts receivable from the U.S. Govern m e n t

includes amounts due under long-term contracts, all 
of which are billed at December 31, 2001 and 2000, of
$2,939,000 and $4,864,000, re s p e c t i v e l y.

38/39 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Note 5.  Inventory

Note 7.  Intangible Assets

I n v e n t o ry consists of the following (in thousands):

Intangible assets consists of the following (in thousands):

2 0 0 1
$ 1 9 , 0 0 3
9 , 6 6 1
5 , 4 5 0

2 0 0 0
$ 1 3 , 5 6 7
8 , 3 8 8
1 , 6 3 2

December 31,
Costs in excess of net assets of 

businesses acquire d

O t h e r

Accumulated amort i z a t i o n

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 0

$ 1 8 , 4 2 3
3 , 2 1 2
2 1 , 6 3 5
( 5 , 7 0 9 )
$ 1 5 , 9 2 6

$ 1 8 , 4 2 3
3 , 1 0 2
2 1 , 5 2 5
( 4 , 3 7 1 )
$ 1 7 , 1 5 4

December 31,
Raw materials
Work in pro c e s s
Finished goods
Costs relating to long-term contracts and 
p rograms, net of amounts attributed 
to revenue recognized to date

P ro g ress payments related to long-term 

contracts and pro g r a m s

LIFO re s e rv e
R e s e rve for excess and obsolete inventory

3 7 , 9 0 8

4 5 , 5 4 2

( 6 , 5 4 0 )
( 9 8 7 )
( 3 , 9 2 1 )
$ 6 0 , 5 7 4

( 1 4 , 0 1 1 )
( 1 , 0 5 9 )
( 3 , 0 0 4 )
$ 5 1 , 0 5 5

The preceding amounts include inventory valued

under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method totaling
$9,141,000 and $5,365,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000,
re s p e c t i v e l y. In the aggregate, these costs are less than
market value.

Note 6.  Property, Plant and Equipment

P ro p e rt y, plant and equipment consists of the following 
(in thousands):

December 31,
Land and land impro v e m e n t s
Buildings and building impro v e m e n t s
M a c h i n e ry, equipment, furn i t u re and fixture s
C o n s t ruction in pro g re s s

Accumulated depre c i a t i o n

$

2 0 0 1
1 , 4 3 6
1 7 , 8 3 7
9 6 , 6 7 4
1 9 , 8 5 8
1 3 5 , 8 0 5
( 6 5 , 3 5 3 )
$ 7 0 , 4 5 2

$

2 0 0 0
1 , 0 3 2
1 4 , 9 7 9
7 7 , 9 0 1
1 8 , 5 6 1
1 1 2 , 4 7 3
( 5 8 , 1 5 6 )
$ 5 4 , 3 1 7

D e p reciation expense totaled $8,468,000, $7,906,000
and $6,526,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y. At December 31, 2001,
$2,782,000 and $612,000 were included in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, re s p e c t i v e l y, for capital
e x p e n d i t u res. At December 31, 2000, $5,372,000 and
$2,093,000 were included in accounts payable and accru e d
liabilities, re s p e c t i v e l y, for capital expenditure s .

A m o rtization expense totaled $1,388,000, $1,445,000

and $1,056,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Note 8.  Accrued Liabilities

A c c rued liabilities consists of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
Employee benefit plan accru a l s
Salaries, wages and incentives
O t h e r

2 0 0 1
$ 6 , 3 0 8
3 , 9 2 5
9 , 6 6 9
$ 1 9 , 9 0 2

2 0 0 0
$ 4 , 7 7 0
2 , 9 2 1
1 0 , 8 5 7
$ 1 8 , 5 4 8

Included in other accrued liabilities are employee
p a y roll deductions, advance payments, accrued operating
expenses, accrued warranty expenses, accrued intere s t
and other items, none of which exceed 5% of total curre n t
l i a b i l i t i e s .

Note 9.  Long-Term Debt

The Company has a credit agreement with a syndicate of
banks (the “Credit Agreement”) that was entered into in
October 1999 and amended as of November 2000 and
F e b ru a ry 2001. The Credit Agreement provides for a
revolving credit facility with an aggregate commitment of
$100,000,000 through January 2005. Under the terms of
the Credit Agreement, interest rates are determined at the
time of borrowing and are based on the London Interbank
O ff e red Rate plus a margin of 1.0% to 3.25%; or the gre a t e r
of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, plus a
m a rgin up to 0.75%. The Company also pays a fee of 0.2%
to 0.5% on the unused portion of the aggre g a t e
commitment. The margins applied to the re s p e c t i v e
i n t e rest rates and the commitment fee are adjusted
q u a rterly and are based on the Company’s ratio of funded
debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
a m o rtization. The weighted average interest rate for
outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2001 was 5.2%.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The weighted average interest rates for borrowings during
the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were 7.4%
and 8.5%, re s p e c t i v e l y. Current maturities of long-term
debt at December 31, 2001 and 2000 re p resent amounts
due under a short - t e rm borrowing arrangement included
in the Credit Agreement. Standby letters of credit up to a
maximum of $15,000,000 may be issued under the Cre d i t
A g reement and no amounts were outstanding at
December 31, 2001 and 2000.

The Credit Agreement contains customary aff i rm a t i v e

and negative covenants, including financial covenants
requiring the maintenance of specified fixed charge and
leverage ratios and minimum levels of net worth. At
December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants and retained earnings of $15.4 million
w e re unrestricted. The Credit Agreement is secured by
substantially all assets of the Company, including but not
limited to accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and
real estate, and is also guaranteed by the subsidiaries of
the Company. The asset collateralization re q u i rement may
be eliminated after June 2002 in the event the Company
achieves certain financial ratios and remains in compliance
with all covenants.

On July 26, 2001, the Company entered into intere s t

rate swap agreements with three banks that eff e c t i v e l y
c o n v e rt a portion of its floating rate debt to a fixed rate
basis for a period of two years, thus reducing the impact 
of interest rate changes on future interest expense. The
swap agreements have a combined notional amount of
$30,000,000 whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of
i n t e rest of 4.52% and receives a variable 30-day LIBOR rate.
The diff e rential to be paid or received is accrued as intere s t
rates change and recognized as an adjustment to intere s t
expense in the consolidated income statement. The
a g g regate fair market value of all interest rate swap
a g reements was approximately $728,000 at December 31,
2001 and was included in other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet with an offset to other
c o m p rehensive income.

I n t e rest incurred during the years ended December 31,

2001, 2000 and 1999 totaled $5,784,000, $5,116,000 and
$1,725,000, re s p e c t i v e l y. Interest paid during the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 totaled
$5,623,000, $5,063,000 and $1,629,000, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Note 10.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accru e d
liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements at their carrying amount which appro x i m a t e s
fair value because of the short - t e rm maturity of those
i n s t ruments. The carrying amount of debt outstanding at
December 31, 2001 and 2000 under the Credit Agre e m e n t
a p p roximates fair value because borrowings are for term s
less than six months and have rates that reflect curre n t l y
available terms and conditions for similar debt. The
Company uses interest rate swap agreements (see Note 9)
to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates for
a portion of the debt. The fair value of the swap
a g reements is recognized in the consolidated financial
s t a t e m e n t s .

Note 11.  Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors noncontributory defined benefit
pension plans (the “Pension Plans”) covering cert a i n
employees of Sypris Technologies, including cert a i n
employees of the operation acquired from Dana in
M a y 2001. The Pension Plans covering salaried and
management employees provide pension benefits that 
a re based on the employee’s highest five-year average
compensation within ten years before re t i rement. The
Pension Plans covering hourly employees and union
members generally provide benefits at stated amounts for
each year of service. The Company’s funding policy is to
make the minimum annual contributions re q u i red by the
applicable regulations. The Pension Plans’ assets are
primarily invested in equity securities and fixed income
securities. The Company re c o rded increases of $1,952,000
and $280,000 in 2001 and 2000, respectively to its m i n i m u m
pension liability, and a decrease of $1,221,000 in 1999.

The following table details the components of pension

expense (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,
S e rvice cost
I n t e rest cost on projected 

benefit obligation

Net amortizations and deferr a l s
Expected re t u rn on plan assets

2 0 0 1
3 5 8

2 0 0 0
1 8 0

$

1 9 9 9
1 8 1

$

1 , 9 3 9
2 4 7
( 1 , 9 6 1 )
5 8 3

1 , 4 0 9
2 2 2
( 1 , 3 3 8 )
4 7 3

$

1 , 2 8 3
1 6 5
( 1 , 0 9 1 )
5 3 8

$

$

$

40/41 Sypris Annual Report 2001

The following are summaries of the changes in the

benefit obligations and plan assets and of the funded
status of the Pension Plans (in thousands):

December 31,
Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Benefit obligation assumed 

in acquisition

S e rvice cost
I n t e rest cost
Plan amendments
Actuarial loss
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of year

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at 

beginning of year

Fair value of plan assets acquired 

in acquisition

Actual re t u rn on plan assets
Company contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at 

end of year

Funded status of the plans:

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 0

$ 1 9 , 0 9 6

$ 1 7 , 8 5 9

1 1 , 5 4 7
3 5 8
1 , 9 3 9
—
4 6 3
( 1 , 4 2 0 )
$ 3 1 , 9 8 3

—
1 8 0
1 , 4 0 9
7 9 8
1 3 1
( 1 , 2 8 1 )
$ 1 9 , 0 9 6

$ 1 5 , 1 5 6

$ 1 4 , 3 2 9

1 0 , 5 4 7
( 1 5 8 )
7 5 4
( 1 , 4 2 0 )

—
9 2 7
1 , 1 8 1
( 1 , 2 8 1 )

$ 2 4 , 7 8 9

$ 1 5 , 1 5 6

Benefit obligation at end of year
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status of plan (underf u n d e d )
U n recognized actuarial loss (gain)
U n recognized prior service cost
Net liability re c o g n i z e d

$ 3 1 , 9 8 3
2 4 , 7 8 9
( 7 , 1 9 4 )
2 , 3 3 9
9 0 3
$ ( 3 , 9 5 2 )

$ 1 9 , 0 9 6
1 5 , 1 5 6
( 3 , 9 4 0 )
( 2 6 0 )
1 , 1 6 6
$ ( 3 , 0 3 4 )

Balance sheet liabilities (assets):

A c c rued benefit liability
Intangible asset
Accumulated other comprehensive 

income (loss)

Net amount re c o g n i z e d

$ 7 , 1 6 0
( 9 0 3 )

$ 4 , 5 1 0
( 1 , 1 2 3 )

( 2 , 3 0 5 )
$ 3 , 9 5 2

( 3 5 3 )
$ 3 , 0 3 4

Assumptions at year end:
Discount rate used in 

d e t e rmining present values
Rate of compensation incre a s e
Expected long-term rate of 
re t u rn on plan assets

7 . 5 0 %
4 . 0 0 %

8 . 0 0 %
4 . 2 5 %

9 . 5 0 %

9 . 5 0 %

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan

(the “Defined Contribution Plan”) for substantially all
employees of the Company. The Defined Contribution
Plan is intended to meet the re q u i rements of Section
401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Defined

Contribution Plan allows the Company to match
p a rticipant contributions and provides discre t i o n a ry
contributions. Contributions to the Defined Contribution
Plan in 2001, 2000 and 1999 totaled $1,933,000, $2,278,000
and $2,052,000, re s p e c t i v e l y.

During 1999, the Company had partially self-insure d

medical plans (the “Medical Plans”) covering cert a i n
employees. Beginning January 1, 2000, the Company
expanded the coverage to cover substantially all
employees. The number of employees participating in 
the Medical Plans was approximately 1,350 and 1,300 at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, re s p e c t i v e l y, as compared 
to approximately 600 at December 31, 1999. The Medical
Plans limit the Company’s annual obligations to fund
claims to specified amounts per participant and in the
a g g regate. The Company is adequately insured for
amounts in excess of these limits. Employees are
responsible for payment of a portion of the pre m i u m s .
During 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company charg e d
$5,890,000, $4,456,000 and $2,802,000, re s p e c t i v e l y, to
operations related to reinsurance premiums, medical
claims incurred and estimated, and administrative costs
for the Medical Plans. Claims paid during 2001, 2000 and
1999 did not exceed the aggregate limits.

Note 12.  Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases certain of its real pro p e rty and
c e rtain equipment, vehicles and computer hard w a re under
operating leases with terms ranging from month-to-month
to ten years and which contain various renewal and re n t
escalation clauses. Future minimum annual lease
commitments (in thousands) under operating leases that
have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in
excess of one year as of December 31, 2001 are as
f o l l o w s :

Years ending December 31,
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 6
2007 and there a f t e r

$ 6 , 9 8 0
6 , 3 6 5
5 , 6 4 3
5 , 2 8 8
4 , 7 1 6
9 , 1 9 4
$ 3 8 , 1 8 6

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2001,

2000 and 1999 totaled $5,550,000, $3,650,000 and
$3,858,000, re s p e c t i v e l y.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations.

The Company is involved in certain litigation and
contract issues arising in the normal course of business.
While the outcome of these matters cannot, at this time, 
be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent there i n ,
management does not expect that these matters will have
a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company.

Note 13.  Stock Option and Purchase Plans

The Company has certain stock compensation plans under
which options to purchase common stock may be granted
to officers, key employees and non-employee dire c t o r s .
Options may be granted at not less than the market price
on the date of grant. Options are exercisable in whole or in
p a rt up to two years after the date of grant and ending ten
years after the date of grant. The following table
summarizes option activity for the three years ended
December 31, 2001:

Shares
1,228,388
226,352
(123,021)
(19,259)

1,312,460
518,746
(114,246)
(163,223)

1,553,737
632,819
(164,616)
(174,980)

Exercise
Price Range
$ 1.72- 31.00
5.94- 9.63
2.76- 6.68
2.96- 11.00

1.72- 31.00
6.56- 10.50
2.76- 8.75
4.24- 10.50

1.72 - 31.00
3.88- 13.27
1.72- 8.75
6.25- 11.76

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 6.35
7.75
4.75
8.26

6.71
9.52
4.08
7.20

7.79
6.15
3.06
8.21

Balance at January 1, 1999
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 1999
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 2000
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 2001

1,846,960

$ 1.72- 31.00

$ 7.61

The Company entered into agreements for the sale
and leaseback of certain specific manufacturing and testing
equipment during 2001 and 2000. The terms of the
operating leases range from five to nine years and the
Company has the option to purchase the equipment at the
expiration of the respective lease at a fixed price based
upon the equipment’s estimated residual value. Lease
payments on these operating leases are guaranteed by 
the Company. Proceeds from the sale and leaseback
transactions during 2001 and 2000 were $5,420,000 and
$9,251,000, re s p e c t i v e l y, and the transactions resulted in a
d e f e rred loss for the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2000 of $787,000 and $351,000, re s p e c t i v e l y, that will be
a m o rtized over the term of the respective leases. Future
minimum annual lease commitments related to these
leases are included in the above schedule.

As of December 31, 2001, the Company had
outstanding purchase commitments of appro x i m a t e l y
$5,045,000, primarily for the acquisition of manufacturing
e q u i p m e n t .

The Company’s Sypris Technologies subsidiary is a 
co-defendant in two lawsuits arising out of an explosion at
a coker plant owned by Exxon Mobil Corporation located
in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. In each of these lawsuits, it 
is alleged that a carbon steel pipe elbow that Sypris
Technologies manufactured was improperly installed 
and the failure of which caused the explosion. One of 
the actions was brought by Exxon Mobil in 1994 in 
state district court in Louisiana and claims damages for
d e s t ruction of the plant, which Exxon Mobil estimates
exceed one hundre d million dollars. Sypris Technologies is
a co-defendant in this action with the fabricator who built
the pipeline into which the elbow was incorporated and
with the general contractor for the plant. The second action
is a class action suit also filed in 1994 in federal court in
Louisiana on behalf of the residents living around the plant
and claims unspecified damages. Sypris Technologies is a
co-defendant in this action with Exxon Mobil, the
contractor and the fabricator. In both actions, the Company
maintains that the carbon steel pipe elbow at issue was
a p p ropriately marked as carbon steel and was impro p e r l y
installed, without Sypris Technologies’ knowledge, by the
fabricator and general contractor in circumstances that
re q u i red the use of a chromium steel elbow. Although the
Company believes these defenses to be meritorious, there
can be no assurance that the Company will not be found
liable for some or all of the alleged damages. If the
Company were to be found liable and the damages
exceeded available insurance coverage, the impact could

42/43 Sypris Annual Report 2001

The following table summarizes certain weighted average data for options outstanding and currently exercisable at

December 31, 2001:

Exercise Price Range

$ 1.72

$ 2.76 - $ 4.12

$ 4.24 - $ 6.25

$ 6.56 - $10.00

$10.06 - $15.76

$16.12 - $23.00

$25.52 - $31.00

Total

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$

1.72

3.82

5.81

8.59

10.92

18.16

28.86

Shares

63,721

34,364

648,123

905,634

181,011

10,003

4,104

1,846,960

$

7.61

Outstanding
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

1.9

4.8

7.1

5.9

6.1

4.4

3.2

6.2

Exercisable
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 1.72

3.82

4.93

8.66

12.62

18.16

28.86

$ 7.54

Shares

63,721

34,364

139,148

464,334

28,661

10,003

4,104

744,335

The Company’s stock compensation program also

p rovides for the grant of perf o rmance-based stock 
options to key employees. The terms and conditions of 
the perf o rmance-based option grants provide for the
d e t e rmination of the exercise price and the beginning of
the vesting period to occur when the fair market value of
the Company’s common stock achieves certain targ e t e d
price levels. Perf o rmance-based options to purc h a s e
56,000 shares, 108,000 shares and 16,000 shares of
common stock were granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999,
re s p e c t i v e l y. Perf o rmance-based options to purc h a s e
32,000 shares and 112,000 shares of common stock were
f o rfeited in 2001 and 2000, re s p e c t i v e l y. None of the
t a rgeted price levels of the perf o rmance-based options
w e re achieved during 2001, 2000 or 1999 and, accord i n g l y,
these options are excluded from disclosures of options
outstanding at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.

The aggregate number of shares of common stock

re s e rved for issuance under the Company’s stock
compensation programs as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 was 3,000,000. The aggregate number of share s
available for future grant as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 was 380,227 and 899,566, re s p e c t i v e l y. Share s
available for future grant at December 31, 2001 include
226,212 shares of common stock related to stock options
that may be subject to future grant under certain of the
C o m p a n y ’s incentive plans based upon the achievement of
c e rtain financial targets and individual perf o rm a n c e
objectives and action by the Company’s Board of Dire c t o r s .
The Company applies APB 25 and related interpre t a-

tions in accounting for its employee stock options because,

as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting
p rovided for under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for 
Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFA S 123”), re q u i res use 
of option valuation models that were not developed for
use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 2 5 ,
when the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock
options is at least equal to the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation
expense is re c o g n i z e d .

P ro forma information re g a rding net income and net
income per share is re q u i red by SFA S 123, and has been
d e t e rmined as if the Company had accounted for its
employee stock options under the fair value method of
S FA S 123. The fair value for options granted by the
Company during 2001, 2000 and 1999 were estimated at
the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Years ended December 31
Expected life (years)
Expected volatility
R i s k - f ree interest rates
Expected dividend yield

2 0 0 1
8
7 5 . 2 0 %
4 . 9 3 %
—

2 0 0 0
8
7 0 . 3 0 %
4 . 9 8 %
—

1 9 9 9
6
7 5 . 5 0 %
6 . 3 0 %
—

The weighted average Black-Scholes value of options

granted under the stock option plans during 2001, 2000
and 1999 was $4.71, $7.05 and $5.50 per share, re s p e c t i v e l y.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models re q u i re
the input of highly subjective assumptions including the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s
employee stock options have characteristics significantly
d i ff e rent from those of traded options, and because
changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially
a ffect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
m e a s u re of the fair value of its employee stock options.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated
fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the
options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro form a
i n f o rmation is as follows (in thousands, except for per
s h a re data):

Years ended December 31,
P ro forma net income
P ro forma net income 
per common share :

B a s i c
D i l u t e d

2 0 0 1
$ 4 , 9 7 7

2 0 0 0
$ 2 , 0 8 6

1 9 9 9
$ 8 , 5 3 3

$ 0 . 5 1
$ 0 . 5 0

$ 0 . 2 2
$ 0 . 2 1

$
$

0 . 9 0
0 . 8 7

The Company has a stock purchase plan that pro v i d e s

substantially all employees who have satisfied the
eligibility re q u i rements the opportunity to purchase share s
of the Company’s common stock on a compensation
deduction basis. The purchase price is the lower of 85% 
of the fair market value of the common stock on the first 
or last business day of the purchase period. Payro l l
deductions may not exceed $6,000 for any six-month cycle.
The stock purchase plan expires January 31, 2006. At
December 31, 2001 and 2000, there were 196,904 share s
and 249,110 shares, re s p e c t i v e l y, available for purc h a s e
under the plan. During 2001 and 2000, a total of 52,206
s h a res and 35,290 shares, re s p e c t i v e l y, were issued 
under the plan.

Note 14.  Stockholder Rights Plan

Note 15.  Income Taxes

On October 23, 2001, the Company’s board of dire c t o r s
a p p roved a stockholder rights plan. Under the plan, each
stockholder of re c o rd as of November 7, 2001 will
automatically receive a distribution of one right for each
outstanding share of common stock held. Each right
entitles the holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a
s h a re of a new series of pre f e rred stock at an exercise price
of $63.00. The rights will trade along with, and not
separately from, the shares of common stock unless they
become exercisable. If any person or group acquires or
makes a tender offer for 15% or more of the common 
stock of the Company (except in transactions approved by
the Company’s board of directors in advance) the rights
become exercisable, and they will separate, become
tradable, and entitle stockholders, other than such person
or group, to acquire, at the exercise price, pre f e rred stock
with a market value equal to twice the exercise price. If the
Company is acquired in a merger or other business
combination with such person or group, or if 50% of its
e a rning power or assets are sold to such person or gro u p ,
each right will entitle its holder, other than such person or
g roup, to acquire, at the exercise price, shares of the
acquiring company’s common stock with a market value of
twice the exercise price. The rights will expire on October
23, 2011, unless redeemed or exchanged earlier by the
C o m p a n y, and will be re p resented by existing common
stock certificates until they become exerc i s a b l e .

As of December 31, 2001, 11,000 shares of the
C o m p a n y ’s pre f e rred stock were designated as Series A
P re f e rred Stock in connection with the adoption of the
stockholder rights plan. There are no shares of Series A
P re f e rred Stock currently outstanding. The holders of
Series A Pre f e rred Stock will have voting rights, be entitled
to receive dividends based on a defined formula and have
c e rtain rights in the event of the Company’s dissolution.
The shares of Series A Pre f e rred Stock shall not be
redeemable. However, the Company may purchase share s
of Series A Pre f e rred Stock in the open market or pursuant
to an offer to a holder or holders.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accord a n c e
with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Ta x e s . ”
A c c o rd i n g l y, deferred income taxes have been provided for
t e m p o r a ry diff e rences between the recognition of re v e n u e
and expenses for financial and income tax re p o rt i n g
purposes and between the tax basis of assets and liabilities
and their re p o rted amounts in the financial statements.

The components of income tax expense (benefit) is as

follows (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,
C u rre n t :

F e d e r a l
S t a t e
O t h e r

D e f e rre d :
F e d e r a l
S t a t e

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 0

1 9 9 9

$ 2 , 1 6 1
2 5 5
1 5
2 , 4 3 1

$

9 6 9
1 0 2
9
1 , 0 8 0

7 0 6
( 2 2 7 )
4 7 9
$ 2 , 9 1 0

( 2 , 3 5 1 )
( 1 2 7 )
( 2 , 4 7 8 )
$ ( 1 , 3 9 8 )

$ 3 , 3 8 6
3 2 0
3 8
3 , 7 4 4

( 6 3 0 )
( 1 5 )
( 6 4 5 )
$ 3 , 0 9 9

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax
re t u rn which includes all subsidiaries. Income taxes paid
during 2001, 2000 and 1999 totaled $1,962,000, $1,347,000
and $2,136,000, re s p e c t i v e l y. During 2001 and 2000, the
Company received $2,108,000 and $2,102,000 in federal
income tax refunds, re s p e c t i v e l y. 

At December 31, 2001, the Company had $17,771,000
of state net operating loss carry f o rw a rds available to off s e t
f u t u re taxable income. Such carry f o rw a rds reflect income
tax losses incurred which will expire on December 31 of 
the following years (in thousands):

December 31,
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 9
2 0 1 0
2 0 1 1
2 0 1 7

$ 2 , 3 8 6
8 , 3 6 2
5 6 0
5 , 9 9 9
4 6 4
$ 1 7 , 7 7 1

The following is a reconciliation of income tax expense
(benefit) to that computed by applying the federal statutory
rate of 34% to income before income taxes (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,
Federal tax at the statutory rate
State income taxes, net of federal 

2 0 0 1
$ 3 , 1 5 4

2 0 0 0
6 0 7

$

1 9 9 9
$ 4 , 3 0 3

tax benefit

2 3 8

1 5 3

2 3 6

Change in valuation allowance for 

d e f e rred tax asset

R e s e a rch and development

tax cre d i t

Non-deductible expenses
O t h e r

( 3 0 0 )

( 3 , 0 0 8 )

( 1 , 8 9 1 )

( 3 3 8 )
2 6 2
( 1 0 6 )
$ 2 , 9 1 0

( 2 6 2 )
2 4 0
8 7 2
$ ( 1 , 3 9 8 )

( 5 4 4 )
1 3 5
8 6 0
$ 3 , 0 9 9

D e f e rred income tax assets and liabilities are as

follows (in thousands):

December 31,
D e f e rred tax assets:

Compensation and benefit accru a l s
I n v e n t o ry valuation
State net operating loss carry f o rw a rd s
Contract pro v i s i o n s
Accounts receivable allowance
Defined benefit pension plan
I n t e rest rate swap agre e m e n t s
O t h e r

Valuation allowance

D e f e rred tax liabilities:

D e p re c i a t i o n

Net deferred tax asset

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 0

$ 1 , 2 8 7
7 2 8
9 7 7
5 1 7
2 9 0
1 , 4 5 1
3 0 9
3 0 3
5 , 8 6 2
( 6 7 7 )
5 , 1 8 5

$ 1 , 1 0 8
6 7 3
9 7 7
7 9 6
2 5 5
9 9 5
—
3 2 7
5 , 1 3 1
( 9 7 7 )
4 , 1 5 4

( 2 , 3 5 4 )
$ 2 , 8 3 1

( 1 , 9 8 1 )
$ 2 , 1 7 3

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

d e c reased by $300,000, $3,008,000 and $1,891,000 in 
2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y. At December 31, 2001,
the valuation allowance of $677,000 relates to state tax 
net operating loss (“NOL”) carry f o rw a rds. Management
believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s 
f u t u re earnings will be sufficient to ensure the realization 
of deferred tax assets for federal and state purposes,
excluding the portion of the state NOL carry f o rw a rd for
which utilization within the carry f o rw a rd period is uncert a i n .

44/45 Sypris Annual Report 2001

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 18.  Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)                
The following is an analysis of certain items in the consolidated income statements by quarter for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands, except for per share data):

Net revenue
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Net income per 

common share:

Basic
Diluted

First

Second

Third

Fourth

First

Second

Third

Fourth

2001

2000

$ 58,035
10,164
2,577
1,019

$ 63,152
10,914
2,912
1,209

$ 65,228
11,063
3,501
1,760

$ 68,225
11,406
4,040
2,379

$ 50,697
10,754
1,182
179

$ 52,118
11,353
2,739
1,368

$ 53,887
9,090
707
90

$ 59,869
9,116
849
1,547

$
$

0.10
0.10

$
$

0.12
0.12

$
$

0.18
0.18

$
$

0.24
0.23

$
$

0.02
0.02

$
$

0.14
0.14

$
$

0.01
0.01

$
$

0.16
0.16

2 0 0

2 9 3

3 4 6

Operating income:

Note 16.  Net Income Per Common Share

Basic income per common share is calculated by dividing
net income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the year. Diluted income per common share is
calculated by using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding adjusted to include the
potentially dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. 

The following table presents information necessary to

calculate net income per common share (in thousands,
except for per share data):

Years ended December 31,
S h a res outstanding:
Weighted average shares 

o u t s t a n d i n g

E ffect of dilutive employee 

stock options

Adjusted weighted average 
s h a res outstanding and 
assumed conversions

Net income applicable to 

common stock

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 0

1 9 9 9

9 , 8 2 8

9 , 6 7 1

9 , 5 1 5

1 0 , 0 2 8

9 , 9 6 4

9 , 8 6 1

$ 6 , 3 6 7

$ 3 , 1 8 4

$ 9 , 5 5 6

Net income per common share :

B a s i c
D i l u t e d

$
$

0 . 6 5
0 . 6 3

$
$

0 . 3 3
0 . 3 2

$
$

1 . 0 0
0 . 9 7

Note 17.  Segment Information

The Company’s operations are conducted in two re p o rt a b l e
business segments: the Electronics Group and the
Industrial Group. The segments are each managed
separately because of the distinctions between the
p roducts, services, markets, customers, technologies and
w o r k f o rce skills of the segments. The Electronics Gro u p
p rovides a wide range of manufacturing and technical
s e rvices for a diversified customer base as an outsourc e d
s e rvice pro v i d e r. The Electronics Group also manufacture s
complex data storage systems, magnetic instru m e n t s ,
c u rrent sensors and other electronic products. The
Industrial Group provides manufacturing services for a
variety of customers that outsource forged and finished
steel components and subassemblies. The Industrial Gro u p
also manufactures high-pre s s u re closures and other
fabricated products. 

Revenue derived from outsourced services for the
E l e c t ronics Group accounted for 67%, 65% and 59% of total
net revenue in 2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y. Revenue

46/47 Sypris Annual Report 2001

derived from outsourced services for the Industrial Gro u p
accounted for 15%, 12% and 15% of total net revenue 
in 2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y. There was no
intersegment net revenue recognized for all years pre s e n t e d .
The following table presents financial information for the
re p o rtable segments of the Company (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,
Net revenue from 

unaffiliated customers:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group

Gross profit:

Electronics Group
Industrial Group

Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate 

and other

Total assets:

Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate 

and other

Depreciation and 
amortization:

Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate 

and other

Capital expenditures:

Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate 

and other

2001

2000

1999

$ 207,282
47,358
$ 254,640

$ 182,126
34,445
$ 216,571

$ 164,963
37,167
$ 202,130

$

$

$

$

37,385
6,162
43,547

12,903
3,563

(3,436)
13,030

$

$

$

$

36,272
4,041
40,313

6,935
1,648

(3,106)
5,477

$

$

$

$

37,873
7,076
44,949

12,005
4,930

(2,769)
14,166

$ 121,228
73,820

$ 124,523
37,851

$ 106,229
26,714

16,396
$ 211,444

16,748
$ 179,122

15,621
$ 148,564

$

$

$

$

7,951
1,694

211
9,856

7,917
19,547

159
27,623

$

$

$

$

8,037
1,109

205
9,351

7,971
15,546

369
23,886

$

$

$

$

6,551
902

129
7,582

6,327
7,134

982
14,443

The Company attributes net revenue to countries
based upon the location of its operations. Export sales
f rom the United States totaled $23,890,000, $25,250,000
and $30,061,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, re s p e c t i v e l y.

R e p o rt of Independent Au d i t o r s

B o a rd of Directors and Stockholders
Sypris Solutions, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sypris Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the 
t h ree years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those

s t a n d a rds re q u i re that we plan and perf o rm the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements re f e rred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Sypris Solutions, Inc. at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. 

Louisville, Kentucky
J a n u a ry 28, 2002

Income from continuing operations

6,367

3,184

9,556

7,446

Discontinued operations, net of tax

—

—

—

—

6,367

3,184

9,556

7,446

1,785

1,527

3,817

5,344

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands, except for per share data)

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

Net revenue

Gross profit

Operating income

Net income

PER SHARE DATA

Income from continuing operations:

Basic
Diluted
Net income:
Basic
Diluted

December 31,

(in thousands)

BALANCE SHEET DATA

Working capital

Total assets

Total debt

Financial Summary

2001

2 0 0 0

1 9 9 9

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

$ 254,640

$ 216,571

$ 202,130

$ 211,625

$ 217,355

43,547

40,313

44,949

47,923

32,135

13,030

5,477

14,166

12,851

$
$

$
$

0.65
0.63

0.65
0.63

$
$

$
$

0.33
0.32

0.33
0.32

$
$

$
$

1.00
0.97

1.00
0.97

$
$

$
$

0.79
0.76

0.79
0.76

$
$

$
$

0.09
0.09

0.50
0.48

2001

1 9 9 9

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 7

1 9 9 6

$ 67,325

$ 58,602

$ 53,705

$

32,121

$ 35,123

211,444

179,122

148,564

121,119

120,608

87,500

65,000

54,400

28,583

31,340

Total stockholders’ equity

70,120

64,205

60,820

49,359

27,728

48/49 Sypris Annual Report 2001

See accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

C o rp o rate Directory

C o m p a ny Locations

Board of Directors

Corporate Officers

Subsidiary Officers

ROBERT E. GILL (5)
C h a i rman of the Board

JEFFREY T. GILL (5)
President & CEO

DAVID D. JOHNSON (5)
Vice President, CFO
& Treasurer

RICHARD L. DAVIS (5)
Senior Vice President
& Secretary

ANTHONY C. ALLEN (5)
Vice President, Controller
& Assistant Secretary

ROBERT E. GILL (1†)
C h a i rman of the Board

JEFFREY T. GILL (1)
President & CEO

HENRY F. FRIGON (1,2†)
C h a i rman 
C A R S TAR, Inc.

R. SCOTT GILL (1)
Managing Broke r
Koenig & Strey GMAC Real Estate

WILLIAM L. HEALEY (2,3)
P ri vate Investor & Consultant

ROGER W. JOHNSON (3†,4)
C h a i rman & CEO
Collectors Unive r s e, Inc.

SIDNEY R. PETERSEN (2,4†)
Retired Chairman & CEO
Getty Oil, Inc.

ROBERT SROKA (3,4)
Managing Pa rt n e r
Lighthouse Holdings, LLC

(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Compensation Committee
(3) Member of Audit and Finance Committee
(4) Member of Nominating and Governance Committee
(5) Executive Officer
† Committee Chairman

50/51 Sypris Annual Report 2001

CYNTHIA Y. BELAK
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.

JAMES  G.COCKE  (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Electronics, LLC

STUART W. JONES
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.

JOHN M. KRAMER (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

RAYMOND E. MINTER
Vice President of Programs
Sypris Electronics, LLC

DAVID L. MONACO
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Electronics, LLC

G. DARRELL ROBERTSON (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.

HENRY L. SINGER II (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.

EDMUND R. STUCZYNSKI
Vice President of Operations
Sypris Electronics, LLC

NORMAN  E.ZELESKY
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

SOUTH CAROLINA
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Square D
8821 Garners Ferry Road
Columbia, SC 29209
Phone: (803) 695-7874

Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Bose Facility
2000 Carolina Pines Drive
Blythewood, SC 29016
Phone: (803) 714-8397

TENNESSEE
Sypris Test & Measurement
305 Seaboard Lane, Suite 318
Franklin, TN 37067
Phone: (615) 771-2421

TEXAS
Sypris Test & Measurement
906 Trinity Drive, Suite H
Mission, TX 78572
Phone: (956) 585-6566

Sypris Test & Measurement
258 East Arapaho, Suite 150
Richardson, TX 75081
Phone: (972) 231-4443

Sypris Data Systems
5500-B Will Ruth Drive
El Paso, TX 79924
Phone: (915) 757-2547

Sypris Technologies
9801 Westheimer Drive
Suite 302
Houston, TX 77042
Phone: (713) 917-6878

ALABAMA
Sypris Data Systems
3322 S. Memorial Parkway
Huntsville, AL  35801
Phone: (256) 881-2231

ARIZONA
Sypris Test & Measurement
2320 West Peoria Av e .
Building D-133
Phoenix, AZ 85029
Phone: (602) 395-5900

CALIFORNIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
2102 Ringwood Av e .
San Jose, CA 95131
Phone: (408) 954-8050

Sypris Test & Measurement
16340 Roscoe Blvd., Suite 100
Van Nuys, CA 91406
Phone: (818) 830-9111

Sypris Data Systems
S u b s i d i a ry Headquarters
605 East Huntington Dr.
Monrovia, CA 91016
Phone: (626) 358-9500

COLORADO
Sypris Data Systems
4800 East Dry Creek Road
Littleton, CO 80122
Phone: (303) 773-4700

Sypris Test & Measurement
4800 East Dry Creek Road
Littleton, CO 80122
Phone: (303) 773-4616

FLORIDA
Sypris Test & Measurement
S u b s i d i a ry Headquarters
6120 Hanging Moss Road
Orlando, FL 32807
Phone: (407) 678-6900

Sypris Electronics
S u b s i d i a ry Headquarters
10901 North McKinley Dr.
Tampa, FL 33612
Phone: (813) 972-6000

Sypris Data Systems
8 Eighth Street
S h a l i m a r, FL 32579
Phone: (850) 651-5158

GEORGIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
1000 Cobb Place Blvd.
Building 200, Suite 240
K e n n e s a w, GA  30144
Phone: (770) 795-8092

ILLINOIS
Sypris Test & Measurement
2055 Army Trail Rd., Suite 108
Addison, IL 60101
Phone: (630) 620-5800

KENTUCKY
Sypris Solutions Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
101 Bullitt Lane, Suite 450
Louisville, KY 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000

Sypris Technologies
S u b s i d i a ry Headquarters
2820 West Broadway
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011

Sypris Technologies
Tube Turns Division
2612 Howard Street
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011

MARYLAND
Sypris Test & Measurement
1321A Mercedes Drive
H a n o v e r, MD 21076
Phone: (410) 850-5056

Sypris Data Systems
9020 Junction Drive
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
Phone: (301) 470-0110

MASSACHUSETTS
Sypris Test & Measurement
53 Second Av e n u e
Burlington, MA 01803
Phone: (781) 272-9050

Sypris Test & Measurement
34 Simarano Drive
Marlborough, MA 01752
Phone: (508) 786-9633

MICHIGAN
Sypris Test & Measurement
24301 Catherine Industrial Road
Suite 116
Novi, MI 48375
Phone: (248) 305-5200

NEW JERSEY
Sypris Test & Measurement
650 Liberty Av e n u e
Union, NJ 07083
Phone: (908) 688-9779

Sypris Test & Measurement
1133 Route 23 South
Wayne, NJ 07470
Phone: (973) 628-1363

NEW YORK
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Delphi Harrison
200 Upper Mountain Road
Building 6, Plant Q
Lockport, NY 14094
Phone: (716) 438-4584

OHIO
Sypris Technologies
1550 Marion-Agosta Road
Marion, OH 43301
Phone: (740) 383-2111

Sypris Test & Measurement
925 Keynote Circ l e
Brooklyn Heights, OH 44131
Phone: (216) 741-7040

Sypris Test & Measurement
3162 Presidential Drive
Fairborn, OH 45234
Phone: (937) 427-3444

PENNSYLVANIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
389 Wolf Camp Road
Fair Hope, PA 15538
Phone: (814) 267-5408

Common Stock Info rm a t i o n

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “SYPR.” The following table sets fort h ,
for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common stock as re p o rted by the
Nasdaq National Market.

Year ended December 31, 2000:

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Year ended December 31, 2001:

First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

High

$11.00
10.75
10.63
8.75

$ 8.00
8.22
10.55
13.46

Low

$ 8.88
8.63
8.63
6.19

$ 4.00
3.75
7.50
9.80

As of January 28, 2002, there were 982 holders of re c o rd of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not plan to pay any cash dividends in
the near future. Our current policy is to retain all earnings to finance future gro w t h .

Investor Information

CORPORATE ADDRESS
S y p ris Solutions, Inc.
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
L o u i s v i l l e, KY 40222
P h o n e : (502) 329-2000
Fa x : (502) 329-2050

ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will 
be held on Tu e s d ay, May 7, 2002, at 10:00
a . m . at 101 Bullitt Lane, Lower Leve l
Seminar Room, Louisville, Ke n t u ck y.

FOR MORE INFORMATION
To learn more about Sypris Solutions, Inc., 
visit our site on the Wo rld Wide Web at
w w w. s y p ri s. c o m .

INVESTOR MATERIALS

The Sypris Web page – www. s y p ri s.com 
– is your entry point for a vast array of 
i n fo rmation about Sypri s, including its 
p r o d u c t s, financial info rmation, real-time
s t o ck quotes, links to each of its 
s u b s i d i a ry operations and other useful
i n fo rm a t i o n .

For investor info rmation, including 
additional annual report s, 10-Ks, 10-Qs 
or any other financial litera t u r e, please
contact Carroll A. D u n avent, Director of
Legal and Corp o rate Serv i c e s, 101 Bullitt
L a n e, Suite 450, Louisville, KY 40222.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains various forward-looking statements.  Statements in this document
that are not historical are forward-looking statements.  Such statements are subject to various
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from those stated.
Such risks and uncertainties include: economic conditions in various regions, product and
price competition, raw material prices, technology changes, patent issues, litigation results,
legal and regulatory developments and other risks and uncertainties described in documents
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

SYPRIS ON NASDAQ
The common stock of Sypris trades 
on the Nasdaq National Market under 
the symbol SYPR.

TRANSFER AGENT
E q u i S e rve Trust Company, N. A .
P. O. B ox 2500
J e r s ey City, NJ 07303
P h o n e : (800) 317-4445
Fa x : (201) 222-4151
w w w. e q u i s e rve. c o m

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
E rnst & Young LLP
400 West Market Street
Suite 2100
L o u i s v i l l e, KY 40202
P h o n e : (502) 585-1400
Fa x : (502) 584-4221

CORPORATE COUNSEL
Wyatt, Ta r rant & Combs, LLP
2800 PNC Plaza
L o u i s v i l l e, KY 40202
P h o n e : (502) 589-5235
Fa x : (502) 589-0309

On the cover

Pages 20 and 21

52

Sypris Annual Report 2001

(from left) Audrey Dupree, Pat Byron, Sharon Retterer, David Mochizuki,
Scott Patterson, Kathy Whitley, Lori Thierjung, Vince Novo, Sam Johnson,
Jim Harrer, Carroll Dunavent, Abraham Ali

(from left) Bill Elderkin, Vinh Tran, Linda Wilson, Chris Vermejan, Shirley
McIntyre, David Rohrer, Rick Belinsky, Paul Savoie, Gene DesJardin, Terry
Ward, Joyce Martin, Leila Castellanos, Shawn Farley, Dr. Mike Pietrantonio