Nothing speaks like performance
2002 Annual Report
®
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
Louisville, Kentucky 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000
Fax: (502) 329-2050
www.sypris.com
Sypris Solutions is a diversified provider of
outsourced services and specialty products. We
perform a wide range of manufacturing, engineering,
design, testing and other technical services, typically
under multi-year, sole-source contracts with major
corporations and government agencies.
We are focused on three core markets: aerospace and
defense electronics, truck components and assemblies,
and test and measurement services.
Our mission is to become the leading supply
chain partner in each of our core markets.
Our performance speaks for itself
Net Revenue (in millions)
Operating Income (in millions)
Operating Margin
$273
$255
$217
$19.0
$13.0
6.9%
5.1%
$5.5
2.5%
00
01
02
00
01
02
00
01
02
Net Income (in millions)
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net Book Value Per Share
$11.4
$6.4
$3.2
$0.84
$0.63
$0.32
$10.03
$6.99
$6.44
00
01
02
00
01
02
00
01
02
Contents
Letter to Stockholders 3
Corporate Officers 6
Our Customers Speak Out 7
Sypris at a Glance 20
Board of Directors 22
Financial Summary 24
Financial Review 25
Common Stock Information 52
Corporate Directory 53
Company Locations 54
Investor Information 55
Performance 2002
Revenue Continued to Grow: Up 7.4%
Driven by an 84% increase for the Industrial Group, revenue
increased for the third consecutive year.
Operating Income Reached a New Record: Up 45%
Improved margin performance resulted in record operating income of $19.0 million.
Net Income Growth Was Impressive: Up 80%
Net income increased to $11.4 million from $6.4 million in 2001.
Earnings per Share Continued to Climb: Up 33%
Earnings per share increased to $0.84 per share including the effect of a 36%
increase in the number of shares outstanding.
EBITDA Rose to a New Record: Up 31%
EBITDA exceeded $30 million, while cash flow from operations increased 61%.
Net Book Value Soared: Up 95%
Net book value increased to $137 million, or $10.03 per share, as a result
of a successful stock offering and strong earnings.
Revenue per Employee Hit a New Record: Up 15%
This important measure of productivity increased for the third consecutive year
to $177,000 per employee.
Net Debt Declined Significantly: Down 67%
The proceeds from the stock offering and strong cash flow enabled
the Company to reduce debt to just 15% of total capital.
Total Assets Reached a New Record: $224 million
Capital investment of almost $20 million in new technology and equipment
pushed total assets to a record high.
Orders Remained Strong: $266 million
Firm orders with specified shipment dates increased almost 10% for the year.
LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS
DEAR FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS:
In our letter last year, we discussed the importance of
market leadership and the vital role played by highly
qualified, motivated employees in the future development
of Sypris. We believe these two leadership elements are
essential to any business that expects to generate
consistently outstanding results.
We are pleased to build upon last year’s strong
foundation with a report of our progress during
2002. The financial results were very positive and
clearly reflected a continued improvement in the
Company’s performance.
The numbers only tell part of the story, however, so we
thought you might like to hear directly from several of our
major customers, six of whom have been featured inside
this annual report. Nothing speaks like performance,
especially when expressed by others.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
The year 2002 was a record-setting year for Sypris
Solutions. The Company reported significant gains in
terms of virtually all important financial measures and
began to realize the benefits derived from a number of
key operating initiatives.
Revenue for 2002 increased for the third consecutive
year, rising 7% to $273 million from $255 million in
2001. The increase was driven by an 84% increase in
revenue from our Industrial Group, which benefited from
a new manufacturing services contract with Visteon, as
well as a full year of production under a long-term
contract signed with Dana during 2001.
Operating income increased 45% to a record $19
million, while net income rose 80% to exceed $11 million
for the year. Margins continued to expand, driven largely
by a 90% increase in gross profit for our Industrial
Group. Revenue per employee increased 15% to a
record $177,000, reflecting a continuing and successful
effort throughout the Company to improve productivity.
Earnings per share increased 33% to $0.84 from $0.63
in 2001, including the effect of a 36% increase in the
number of shares outstanding. Net book value increased
95% to $137 million, or $10.03 per share, as a result of
strong earnings and the successful sale of $56 million of
common stock to the public in March 2002.
Cash flow from operations increased 61% to a record
$14 million. This increase was achieved even after we
invested $6 million in two of our defined benefit pension
plans during the fourth quarter, ensuring that they were
100% funded and the future of our employees’ retirement
was on solid ground.
The growing financial strength and positive earnings
trend of Sypris led the Board of Directors to declare the
Company’s first quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share
during 2002. We are optimistic that the future
performance of the Company will enable the Board to
continue providing stockholders with a current rate of
return on their investment.
Our strong report card for 2002 could have been better,
however, as cost overruns on new programs and revenue
shortfalls on others prevented us from reaching our targeted
expectations. We will continue to address these and other
issues with the appropriate sense of urgency so as to
further enhance the Company’s financial performance.
ROBERT E. GILL, Chairman of the Board and JEFFREY T. GILL, President & CEO
2 SYPR
SYPR 3
LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS
LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS
INVESTMENTS
We continued to invest in the future of the Company,
with capital expenditures approximating $20 million
during 2002, or over 7% of revenue.
During the past five years, we have invested over $100
million in new technology and automation to support
the needs of our customers. We believe that these
investments are essential to our ability to provide our
customers with manufacturing and technical services that
are cost-competitive on a global scale.
Of particular note, we also invested in the implementation
of a Six Sigma program in our Electronics Group during
the year. The results in terms of improved quality, customer
service and reduced costs were outstanding. We are now
committed to expanding the Six Sigma program
throughout Sypris and plan to train all of our employees
in these powerful techniques within the next few years.
CONTRACT AWARDS
During 2002, we secured new multi-year supply
agreements with the National Security Agency, Visteon,
BAE Systems, Honeywell and the Federal Aviation
Administration, bringing the total estimated value of
new contract awards to $302 million for the year.
The Visteon contract is particularly noteworthy. Under
the supply agreement, which began in early 2002,
Sypris is providing axle shafts for Ford’s F-150, F-250,
F-350 and Ranger-series pickup trucks; the Ford
Expedition; the Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Mustang
GT. The agreement runs through 2006 and has a projected
value of $150 million over the term of the contract.
Long-term, sole-source contracts serve as the foundation of
our strategic partnerships with a growing number of large
corporations and government agencies, with new contract
awards reaching an estimated $676 million over the past
24 months. We expect these supply agreements to make
a meaningful contribution to the growth and stability of
Sypris for years to come.
THE FUTURE
As we look ahead:
Aerospace & Defense Electronics
The market for aerospace and defense electronics is
expected to benefit from the Government’s renewed and
sustained focus on our Country’s national defense.
We have long-term contracts with many of the leading
aerospace and defense contractors, including BAE
Systems, Boeing, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, Northrop
Grumman and Raytheon. We also have a long-term
relationship with the National Security Agency to design
and build secure communications equipment and develop
encryption software.
These strategic partnerships enable us to invest the
resources necessary to deliver the high-level of technical
services demanded by these important customers, a
factor that we believe sets us apart from our competition.
Consequently, we believe that Sypris, with over 35 years
of experience in aerospace and defense electronics, is
uniquely positioned to play an increasingly larger role for
our customers as they prepare to meet the expected
increase in demand for their own products and services.
Truck Components & Assemblies
According to recent industry publications, the production
of medium and heavy-duty trucks is forecast to
approximate 2002 levels in 2003, then increase by
an estimated 15% per year through 2006 as fleet
owners replace aging vehicles.
Sypris is the principal supplier of manufacturing services
for the production of medium and heavy-duty truck axle
shafts in North America. We will continue investing to
expand our relationships with and provide additional
value for our strategic customers in this market. As industry
forecasts indicate, our opportunities are significant.
OUR CUSTOMERS SPEAK OUT
Exceeding customer expectations is critical to the success
of any company in today’s harsh economic business
climate. The statements of six of our key customers in this
annual report reflect the devoted efforts of our employees
to do whatever is necessary to contribute to the success of
our customers. We hope you find their perspectives to be
of value and interest.
Test & Measurement Services
THANK YOU
The market for test and measurement services has been
hit hard by the difficult economy and remains highly
fragmented, with a wide variety of often thinly-capitalized
businesses vying to service the local needs of large
national corporations.
We want to thank our employees, many of whom are
fellow stockholders, for their hard work over this past
year. The many achievements of 2002 would not have
been possible without their commitment, energy and
hard work.
Due to the need to control costs and ensure quality and
reliability, these corporations are increasingly looking for
strong national providers to handle all of their service
requirements. We will use our financial strength during
the coming years to accelerate the growth of our national
capability to meet the needs of these large and
demanding customers.
Our Vision
We also want to thank our customers for the opportunity
to serve them. We are dedicated to providing each of
these business partners with the right solutions to improve
their competitiveness.
We sincerely appreciate your investment in Sypris
Solutions and encourage you to contact us. We
welcome your comments and would be pleased to
answer your questions.
Our vision is focused and clear. Sypris is an outsourcing
specialist that is dedicated to using its resources to service
long-term, strategic partnerships with industry-leading
corporations and government agencies.
We will continue to invest in markets where we can
sustain a competitive advantage. We believe that our
ongoing initiatives to increase market share, while
maintaining a balanced business mix, will serve Sypris
and its stockholders well for many years to come.
Jeffrey T. Gill
President & CEO
Robert E. Gill
Chairman of the Board
4 SYPR
SYPR 5
CORPORATE OFFICERS
Performance 2002
The numbers speak for themselves.
We thought you might like to hear from
a few of our key customers.
Corporate Officers from left:
RICHARD L. DAVIS, G. DARRELL ROBERTSON, JOHN M. KRAMER,
DAVID D. JOHNSON, JAMES G. COCKE, ANTHONY C. ALLEN
6 SYPR
SYPR 7
HONEYWELL
Robert B. Sanders
Honeywell partnered with Sypris to build the
color display avionics for the AH-64D Apache
Longbow attack helicopter, the world’s most
advanced multi-role combat helicopter.
Why?
“Flight controls and displays represent a core
competency for Honeywell. We needed a partner
that we and our customer could absolutely rely
upon. Flight Safety and Quality simply could not
be compromised.”
Robert B. Sanders
Site Executive & Director of Display Programs
Honeywell Defense & Space Electronic Systems
Honeywell is a leading provider of integrated avionics, engines, systems and service
solutions for aircraft manufacturers, airlines, business and general aviation, military,
space and airport operations.
8 SYPR
SYPR 9
BAE SYSTEMS
BAE Systems selected Sypris to help produce its
Joint Chemical Agent Detector, a revolutionary new
product for the detection of nerve, blister and
blood agents.
Why?
“The global market for this hand-held product is
expected to grow significantly. Sypris has the
proven manufacturing capability we needed to
meet this demand.”
Ronda Foster
Vice President &
General Manager
Battlespace Awareness Systems
BAE Systems Integrated Defense Solutions creatively adapts and integrates technologies
to rapidly produce solutions for homeland security. Products include chemical and
biological detection systems, mine countermeasures, intelligent combat systems and
airborne target presentations.
Ronda Foster
10 SYPR
SYPR 11
Franklin D. Wyatt
RAYTHEON
Raytheon and Sypris have worked closely
together for years to produce the highly effective
AMRAAM missile for the Air Force, Navy and
our allies.
Why?
“Sypris has helped us to continuously reduce our
cost even as we enhanced the missile’s design and
capabilities time and again.”
Franklin D. Wyatt
Director of AMRAAM Missile Program
Raytheon Missile Systems is the world leader in the design, development and production
of missile systems for critical requirements, including air-to-air, strike, surface Navy air
defense, land combat missiles, guided projectiles, exoatmospheric kill vehicles and
directed energy weapons.
12 SYPR
SYPR 13
DANA CORPORATION
Dana relies on Sypris to supply axle shafts,
ring gears and pinions for its axle assemblies
for North American medium and heavy-duty
truck customers.
Bill Hennessy
Why?
“In today’s volatile heavy truck market, we count on
Sypris to provide top-quality, on-time parts and to
help us control our production costs.”
Bill Hennessy
Director of Global Manufacturing
Heavy Vehicle Technologies
and Systems Group
The Heavy Vehicle Technologies and Systems Group of Dana designs, manufactures
and markets front steer, rear-drive, trailer and auxiliary axles, drive shafts, steering
shafts, brakes, suspensions and related systems, modules and services for the
commercial vehicle market.
14 SYPR
SYPR 15
Mo Ashraf
LOCKHEED MARTIN
Lockheed Martin selected Sypris data recorders
to support the mission-critical requirements of the
Navy Trident II Fleet Ballistic Missile program.
Why?
“Sypris simply has the best technical staff in
the industry. They are responsive and always
available to help.”
Mo Ashraf
Manager
Fleet Ballistic Missile Systems Engineering
Missile Data Center
Lockheed Martin Space Systems is a global leader in the design, development,
test and production of space launch systems, ground systems, scientific spacecraft,
satellites for commercial and government customers, fleet ballistic missiles and
missile defense systems.
16 SYPR
SYPR 17
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
The Federal Aviation Administration
depends upon Sypris to provide critical calibration
and certification services at over 400 airports
in the United States.
Frank Kulesa
Why?
“The loss of control tower radar at any time would
paralyze an airport. Sypris has the unique ability
to service our requirements at all of our locations.”
Frank Kulesa
National Test Equipment Manager
The FAA manages the nation’s airspace and provides the facilities and services
necessary for air commerce. The mission of the FAA is to provide a safe, secure
and efficient global aerospace system that contributes to national security and the
promotion of U.S. aerospace safety.
18 SYPR
SYPR 19
SYPRIS AT A GLANCE
Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. Outsourced manufacturing and technical
services accounted for approximately 84% of total revenue in 2002. We are a leading supplier of manufacturing
services for the production of complex circuit cards, high-level assemblies and subsystems to major aerospace and
defense companies and agencies of the U.S. Government. We are the principal supplier of manufacturing services for
the forging and machining of heavy-duty truck axle shafts in North America, and we provide technical services for
the calibration, certification and repair of test and measurement equipment in the United States.
Market-Focused Businesses
Business Summary
Applications and Uses
Select Customers
Manufacturing Services
Engineering Services
Products
Integrated design and engineering
services, component selection, sourcing
and procurement, automated assembly,
design and implementation of product
testing, systems assembly, and repair
and warranty services.
Software design services for data and
communications security products and
contract design services.
Encryption devices, digital and analog
recorders, multiplexers, storage systems
and touch screen control software.
Electronic assemblies and subsystems for use in
military cockpit control and display systems, missile
guidance systems, commercial avionics, satellite
communications systems, ruggedized hand-held
computers, and secure communications networks
and products.
BAE Systems, Boeing, Eaton, Honeywell, L3,
Lockheed Martin, National Security Agency,
Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and U.S. Army.
Secured transmission of voice and data for
intelligence and surveillance applications.
General Services Administration, National Security
Agency and U.S. Army.
Network and communications security, collection of
sonar data from submarines, test data from aircraft,
biological data from space flights, performance
data from missiles and voice data from intelligence
networks.
General Dynamics, Government of Israel, Johnson
Space Center, Lockheed Martin, NASA, National
Security Agency, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon,
Titan Corporation, TRW, U.S. Air Force,
U.S. Army and U.S. Navy.
Manufacturing Services
Automated forging, machining, induction
hardening, cold extrusion, heat-treating,
testing and fabrication of products,
production tooling and prototypes.
Axle shafts, ring gears, pinions, input shafts, helical
gears and other drive train components for use in
light, medium and heavy-duty trucks, SUVs, pickup
trucks and automobiles. Jet engine shafts and
construction vehicle components.
ArvinMeritor, Caterpillar, Dana, John Deere,
Pratt & Whitney, Teledyne Technologies
and Visteon.
Products
High-pressure closures, transition joints
and insulated joints.
Pipeline and chemical systems in the energy and
chemical industries.
Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell Oil.
Calibration and Repair
Testing
Products
Calibration, repair and certification of
electrical, electronic, physical and
dimensional test equipment, diagnostic
and process control equipment.
Testing of digital, linear, discrete, passive
and hybrid components, environmental
testing, dynamics testing, failure analysis
and transportation testing on products,
systems and subassemblies.
Hall generators, current sensors,
autoprobes and gaussmeters.
Telecommunications systems, air traffic control systems,
electronic component manufacturing, automotive,
process control, weather radar systems, aerospace
and defense, medical equipment manufacturing and
power generation and distribution.
Anadigics, AT&T, Bose, Delphi Automotive, FAA,
General Dynamics, Honeywell, ITT, Lucent
Technologies, Maxtor, National Weather Service,
Siemens, Square D, Tyco Electronics and TRW
Automotive.
Military, semiconductor manufacturing, aerospace,
satellite and launch systems, avionics, medical,
telecommunications and transportation.
Abbott Labs, Arrow-Zeus, BAE Systems, Boeing,
Eldec, Goodrich, Honeywell, JPL, L-3, Lockheed
Martin, Medtronics, NASA, Northrop Grumman,
Raytheon, Sawtek and Suntron.
Current measurement applications in locomotives,
mass transit systems, elevators, automotive diagnostic
systems and laboratory diagnostic systems. Magnetic
measurement for research and development, quality
control and manufacturing.
General Motors, Genie, Lockheed Martin, Miltope,
Snap-on, Toyo, Ithaco and SPX.
e
s
n
e
f
e
D
d
n
a
e
c
a
p
s
o
r
e
A
s
c
i
n
o
r
t
c
e
E
l
s
t
n
e
n
o
p
m
o
C
k
c
u
r
T
s
e
i
l
b
m
e
s
s
A
d
n
a
t
n
e
m
e
r
u
s
a
e
M
d
n
a
t
s
e
T
s
e
c
i
v
r
e
S
20 SYPR
SYPR 21
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert E. Gill has served as Chairman of the Board of Sypris and its predecessor since 1983,
and as President and Chief Executive Officer of its predecessor from 1983 to 1992. Prior to
1983, Mr. Gill served in a number of senior executive positions, including Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Armor Elevator Company, Vice President of A. O. Smith
Corporation and President and Chief Executive Officer of Elevator Electric Company. Mr. Gill
holds a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington and an MBA
from the University of California at Berkeley. He is Chairman of the Executive Committee.
Robert E. Gill is the father of Jeffrey T. Gill and R. Scott Gill.
Jeffrey T. Gill has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sypris and its predecessor
since 1992, and as Executive Vice President of its predecessor from 1983 to 1992. Mr. Gill
holds a BS degree in Business Administration from the University of Southern California and an
MBA from Dartmouth College. A director of Sypris and its predecessor since 1983, Mr. Gill is a
member of the Executive Committee. Jeffrey T. Gill is the son of Robert E. Gill and the brother of
R. Scott Gill.
Henry F. Frigon has served as a private investor and business consultant since 1994. Mr. Frigon
served as Chairman of CARSTAR, a national provider of collision repair services, from 2000
to 2001, and as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 1998 to 2000. Prior to 1994,
Mr. Frigon served in a number of senior executive positions, including Executive Vice President-
Corporate Development and Strategy, and Chief Financial Officer of Hallmark Cards, and
President and Chief Executive Officer of BATUS. A director of Sypris since 1997 and of Sypris
Electronics from 1994 until its merger with Sypris in 1998, Mr. Frigon also serves as a director
of H&R Block, Buckeye Technologies, Dimon, Tuesday Morning and Packaging Corporation of
America. He is Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Executive and
Nominating and Governance Committees.
R. Scott Gill has served as a Managing Broker with Koenig & Strey GMAC Real Estate, a
residential real estate firm, since 2001. Mr. Gill served as an Associate with Koenig & Strey
GMAC Real Estate from 1999 to 2001, as Project Manager for IA Chicago, an architectural
design firm, from 1998 to 1999, as Senior Vice President and Secretary of Sypris from 1997 to
1998, and as Vice President and Secretary of its predecessor from 1983 to 1998. A director of
Sypris and its predecessor since 1983, Mr. Gill is a member of the Executive Committee. R. Scott
Gill is the son of Robert E. Gill and the brother of Jeffrey T. Gill.
William L. Healey has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cal Quality
Electronics, an electronics manufacturing company, since 2002. Mr. Healey served as a private
investor and consultant from 1999 to 2002, as Chairman of the Board of Smartflex Systems, an
electronics manufacturing company, from 1996 to 1999 and as its President and Chief Executive
Officer from 1989 to 1999. Prior to 1989, Mr. Healey served in a number of senior executive
positions with Silicon Systems, including Senior Vice President of Operations. A director of Sypris
since 1997, Mr. Healey also serves as a director of Microsemi Corporation. He is Chairman of
the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Roger W. Johnson is currently a private investor, educator and business consultant. Mr. Johnson
served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, a provider of
services to dealers and collectors of high-end collectibles, from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Johnson served as
Chief Executive Officer of YPO International (Young Presidents Organization) from 1998 to 2000 and as
Administrator of the General Services Administration from 1993 to 1996. Prior to 1993, Mr. Johnson
served in a number of senior executive positions, including Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Western Digital Corporation. A director of Sypris since 1997 and of Sypris Electronics from
1996 until its merger with Sypris in 1998, Mr. Johnson also serves as a director of the Needham
Funds, Insulectro, Maxtor Corporation and Computer Access Technology Corporation. He is Chairman
of the Audit and Finance Committee and a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Sidney R. Petersen retired as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Getty Oil
in 1984, where he served in a variety of increasingly responsible management positions since
1955. A director of Sypris since 1997 and of Sypris Electronics from 1994 until its merger with
Sypris in 1998, Mr. Petersen also serves as a director of Avery Dennison Corporation. He is a
member of the Compensation and Audit and Finance Committees.
Robert Sroka has served as Managing Partner of Lighthouse Partners, a private investment
and business consulting company, since 1998. Mr. Sroka served as Managing Director of
Investment Banking-Mergers and Acquisitions for J.P. Morgan from 1994 to 1998. Prior to
1994, Mr. Sroka served in a variety of senior executive positions with J.P. Morgan, including
Vice President-Investment Banking and Vice President-Corporate Finance. A director of Sypris
since 1997, Mr. Sroka also serves as a director of Avado Brands. He is a member of the
Compensation and Audit and Finance Committees.
22 SYPR
SYPR 23
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Financial Review
Years ended December 31,
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998(1)
(in thousands, except for per share data)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Net revenue
Gross profit
$ 273,477
$ 254,640
$ 216,571 $ 202,130 $ 211,625
49,521
43,547
40,313
44,949
47,923
Operating income
18,956
13,030
5,477
14,166
12,851
Net income
11,439
6,367
3,184
9,556
7,446
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
$
$
0.87
0.84
$
$
0.65
0.63
$
$
0.33 $
1.00 $
0.32 $
0.97 $
0.79
0.76
December 31,
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998(1)
(in thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital
$ 77,593
$ 67,325
$ 58,602 $ 53,705 $ 32,121
Total assets
Total debt
223,605
211,444
179,122
148,564
121,119
37,000
87,500
65,000
54,400
28,583
Total stockholders’ equity
137,035
70,120
64,205
60,820
49,359
(1) For periods ended prior to March 30, 1998:
• The consolidated financial statements of our predecessor are included as our predecessor was deemed to be the acquirer for
accounting purposes in our reorganization.
• The computation of earnings per common share has been adjusted to exclude the minority interests reflected in the historical
financial statements of our predecessor.
• Shares used in computing earnings per common share reflect our one-for-four reverse stock split that occurred on March 30, 1998,
and include the outstanding shares of our common stock as of March 30, 1998 and the dilution associated with common stock
options issued prior to that date.
26
Report of Management
27
Report of Independent Auditors
28
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
34
Consolidated Income Statements
35
Consolidated Balance Sheets
36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
37
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
24 SYPR
SYPR 25
Report of Management
Report of Independent Auditors
The management of Sypris Solutions, Inc. is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The consolidated financial statements include amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Financial
information included elsewhere in this annual report is consistent with these consolidated financial statements.
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sypris Solutions, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sypris Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
We maintain a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed in
ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility
accordance with proper authorization and are appropriately recorded in order to permit preparation of financial statements in
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and that assets are adequately safeguarded and accountability for
assets is maintained. Although no cost-effective internal control system will prevent all errors and irregularities, we believe our
controls provide reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements are reliable and that our assets are
reasonably safeguarded. Internal controls and procedures are periodically reviewed and revised, when appropriate, due to
changing circumstances and requirements.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
To ensure the effective administration of internal control, we strive to carefully select and train our employees, maintain and
reasonable basis for our opinion.
disseminate written policies and procedures, provide appropriate communication channels and seek to foster an environment
conducive to the effective functioning of internal controls. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct that requires all
employees, including officers and senior level executives, to adhere to high standards of personal and professional integrity.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Sypris Solutions, Inc. at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
The Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors is composed entirely of outside directors, including one of whom
generally accepted in the United States.
the Board of Directors has deemed to be a financial expert. The Audit and Finance Committee members meet the Nasdaq
Stock Market standards for independence and operate under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Audit
and Finance Committee meets periodically with representatives of management and our independent auditors to review our
financial reporting process and our controls to safeguard assets. Our independent auditors have full and free access to the
Audit and Finance Committee members at all times, without the presence of management, to discuss the results of their
audits, the adequacy of our internal accounting control and the quality of our financial reporting process.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for
goodwill and other intangible assets.
Louisville, Kentucky
January 31, 2003
Jeffrey T. Gill
David D. Johnson
President & CEO
Vice President, CFO & Treasurer
26 SYPR
SYPR 27
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read together with the consolidated
Results of Operations
financial statements and notes thereto.
The following table sets forth certain data from our consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001
As of January 1, 2002, we changed the name of our four major operating subsidiaries as part of a comprehensive branding initiative.
and 2000, expressed as a percentage of net revenue:
The new names of our four subsidiaries are Sypris Data Systems, Inc., formerly Metrum-Datatape, Inc.; Sypris Electronics, LLC,
formerly Group Technologies Corporation; Sypris Technologies, Inc., formerly Tube Turns Technologies, Inc.; and Sypris Test &
Measurement, Inc., formerly Bell Technologies, Inc.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our results of operations are based on the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to select
accounting policies for critical accounting areas as well as estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements. Significant changes in assumptions and/or conditions in our critical accounting policies could
materially impact our operating results.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. We believe our most critical
accounting policies include revenue recognition and cost estimation on certain contracts for which we use a percentage of
completion, units of delivery method of accounting. This accounting method is applied by our Electronics Group for outsourced
services provided under multi-year contracts with aerospace and defense customers. Approximately 44%, 53% and 49% of total
net revenue was recognized under the percentage of completion, units of delivery method of accounting during 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. Revenue is recognized on these contracts when units are accepted by and shipped to the customer, with unit
revenue derived based upon the total contract revenue and total units to be delivered over the life of the contract. The
corresponding recognition of cost of sales for the delivered units is based upon our estimates of costs to be incurred for the total
contract. Under this approach, we compare estimated costs to complete an entire contract to total net revenue for the term of the
contract to arrive at an estimated gross margin percentage for each contract. Each month, the estimated gross margin percentage
is applied to the cumulative net revenue recognized on the contract to arrive at cost of sales for the period. Management reviews
these estimates monthly and the effect of any change in the estimated gross margin percentage for a contract is reflected in cost
of sales in the period in which the change is known. Such changes to these estimates have not been material to our quarterly
results of operations during the three year period ended December 31, 2002. If increases in projected costs to complete are
sufficient to create a loss contract, the entire estimated loss is charged to operations in the period the loss first becomes known.
Additionally, our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory is primarily based upon forecasted demand for our products and any
change to the reserve arising from forecast revisions is reflected in cost of sales in the period the revision is made.
The complexity of the estimation process and all issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the
application of the percentage of completion, units of delivery method of accounting affect the amounts reported in our
consolidated financial statements. A number of internal and external factors affect our cost of sales estimates, including labor rate
and efficiency variances, revised estimates of warranty costs, estimated future material prices and customer specification and
testing requirement changes. If our business conditions were different, or if we used different assumptions in the application of
this and other accounting policies, it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported in our consolidated financial
statements.
Consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," goodwill
is no longer amortized, but instead tested at least annually for impairment. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized using the
straight-line method over its estimated period of benefit of 15 years. We have not recorded any impairments of goodwill since
adopting SFAS No. 142.
Consistent with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," we evaluate long-lived assets
for impairment and assess their recoverability based upon anticipated future cash flows. If facts and circumstances lead us to
believe that the cost of one of our assets may be impaired, we will write down that carrying amount to fair value to the extent
necessary. We have not recorded any impairments of long-lived assets since adopting SFAS No. 144.
Years ended December 31,
Net revenue:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
Total net revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Amortization of intangible assets
Special charges
Operating income
Net income
2002
2001
2000
68.2%
31.8
100.0
81.9
18.1
9.9
1.3
—
—
6.9%
4.2%
81.4%
18.6
84.1%
15.9
100.0
100.0
82.9
17.1
10.3
1.2
0.5
—
5.1%
2.5%
81.4
18.6
12.4
1.6
0.7
1.4
2.5%
1.5%
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Net Revenue. Net revenue was $273.5 million in 2002, an increase of $18.9 million, or 7.4%, from $254.6 million in 2001. Backlog
at December 31, 2002 was $154.2 million, a decrease of $8.1 million from $162.3 million at December 31, 2001. Backlog for our
Electronics Group and Industrial Group at December 31, 2002 was $115.4 million and $38.8 million, respectively.
Net revenue for our Electronics Group in 2002 was $186.6 million, a decrease of $20.7 million, or 10.0%, from $207.3 million in 2001.
The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to lower revenue in manufacturing services and other outsourced services.
Manufacturing services revenue decreased $14.7 million primarily due to lower aerospace and defense shipments during 2002 and
the completion of a commercial contract in the fourth quarter of 2001. Other outsourced services revenue decreased $5.4 million
primarily due to a 16% decline in revenue for test and measurement services. Weak economic conditions and a slowdown in the
telecommunications, semiconductor, and commercial avionics markets negatively affected demand for test and measurement
services from our customers. Product sales accounted for a decrease in net revenue of $0.6 million during 2002, primarily due to
reduced sales quantities for magnetics products.
Net revenue for our Industrial Group in 2002 was $86.9 million, an increase of $39.6 million, or 83.3%, from $47.3 million in 2001.
The increase in net revenue was primarily due to the full year effect of the May 2001 contract with Dana Corporation and the
addition of a contract with Visteon Corporation. The contract with Dana for fully machined, medium and heavy-duty truck axle
shafts and other drive train components, generated outsourced services revenue totaling $38.6 million in 2002, as compared to
$17.7 million in 2001. Under the contract with Visteon we began supplying light axle shafts for pickup trucks and sport utility
vehicles during the first quarter of 2002.
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2002 was $49.5 million, an increase of $6.0 million, or 13.8%, from $43.5 million in 2001. Gross
margin as a percentage of net revenue in 2002 increased to 18.1% from 17.1% in 2001.
Gross profit for our Electronics Group in 2002 was $37.8 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or 1.1%, from $37.4 million in 2001.
Gross margin for our Electronics Group increased to 16.2% in 2002 from 14.0% in 2001. Gross margin increased due to cost
reductions, improved manufacturing efficiencies and a more favorable revenue mix in 2002 as compared to 2001. This improvement
in margin was partially offset by lower profit resulting from a decrease in net revenue.
Gross profit for our Industrial Group in 2002 was $11.7 million, an increase of $5.6 million, or 91.8%, from $6.1 million in 2001.
Gross margin for our Industrial Group increased to 13.5% in 2002 from 13.0% in 2001. The increase in gross profit was primarily
due to revenue growth from contracts with Dana and Visteon. Start-up costs and manufacturing inefficiencies related to our initial
production under the Visteon contract limited the gross profit contribution from this business.
28 SYPR
SYPR 29
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense in 2002 was $27.1 million, or 9.9% of net
services is lower than other outsourced services, the change in revenue mix contributed to the decrease in gross margin. Another
revenue, as compared to $26.1 million, or 10.3% of net revenue in 2001. The increase in selling, general and administrative
factor in the gross margin decline was a slight decrease in gross margin on other outsourced services, primarily due to adverse
expense was primarily attributable to additional management and administrative infrastructure to support the growth in our
economic conditions impacting demand and pricing for certain services provided to our customers. Gross profit from product
Industrial Group, partially offset by reduced selling expenses in our Electronics Group. During the fourth quarter of 2002, selling,
sales decreased $2.1 million during 2001, primarily due to reduced demand for certain product offerings.
general and administrative expense was 8.8% of net revenue, primarily due to a reduction in our incentive bonus expense based
on performance measures defined in our incentive plans.
Gross profit for our Industrial Group in 2001 was $6.1 million, an increase of $2.1 million or 52.5% from $4.0 million in 2000.
Excluding the new contract with Dana, gross profit declined $0.9 million in 2001 primarily due to the downturn of the heavy-duty
Research and Development. Research and development expense in 2002 was $3.4 million, or 1.3% of net revenue, as compared
truck market. The reduction in demand and corresponding impact on shipments occurred as our organizational infrastructure to
to $3.1 million, or 1.2% of net revenue in 2001. Our research and development spending in 2002 and 2001 was primarily
support future growth plans was being developed. The increased cost structure associated with the additional people and systems
attributable to our Electronics Group and was related to new product releases for the data systems product lines.
required to meet future contractual requirements and the underabsorption of overhead due to the volume decline resulted in a
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets ceased when we adopted SFAS
No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. Amortization of intangible assets in 2002 was $0.1 million, compared to $1.3 million in 2001.
Interest Expense, Net.
Interest expense in 2002 was $2.7 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 34.1%, from $4.1 million in 2001.
The decrease in interest expense from the comparable period reflects the 2002 repayment of debt with proceeds from our public
stock offering combined with a reduction in our weighted average interest rate. Our weighted average debt outstanding
decreased to approximately $49.8 million for 2002 from approximately $74.5 million for 2001. The weighted average interest rate
for 2002 was approximately 5.8% as compared to approximately 7.4% for 2001. There was no capitalized interest for 2002 as
compared to $1.8 million for 2001.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense was $4.9 million in 2002 as compared to $2.9 million in 2001. The effective tax rate was
30.1% and 31.4% in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The effective tax rate for both years reflects research and development tax
credits, Extraterritorial Income Exclusion tax benefits and a reduction in our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The
reduction in the valuation allowance for 2002 and 2001 was $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000
decline in our gross margin, excluding the impact of the new contract with Dana, to 10.6% in 2001, as compared to 11.7% for the
prior year. Gross margin for our Industrial Group during 2001, including the new contract with Dana, was 13.0%.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense in 2001 was $26.1 million, or 10.3% of net
revenue, as compared to $26.9 million, or 12.4% of net revenue in 2000. Although net revenue increased 17.6% from 2000 to 2001
and the new contract with Dana added approximately $1.0 million to selling, general and administrative expense during 2001, our
total selling, general and administrative spending decreased by $0.8 million, or 2.8%. The decline in selling, general and
administrative expense was primarily attributable to decreased selling expenses and commissions related to lower product sales
for our Electronics Group, decreased marketing costs and cost reductions in both our Electronics Group and Industrial Group in
response to the general weakness in the U.S. economy.
Research and Development. Research and development expense in 2001 was $3.1 million, or 1.2% of net revenue, as compared
to $3.6 million, or 1.6% of net revenue in 2000. The decrease in research and development expense was attributable to our
Electronics Group, and was related to the quantity and timing of new product releases for the data systems product lines and the
increased utilization of strategic alliances with suppliers for product development.
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets in 2001 was $1.3 million, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 7.5%
Net Revenue. Net revenue was $254.6 million in 2001, an increase of $38.0 million, or 17.6%, from $216.6 million in 2000.
compared to $1.4 million in 2000.
Backlog at December 31, 2001 was $162.3 million, an increase of $1.5 million from $160.8 million at December 31, 2000. Backlog
for our Electronics Group and Industrial Group at December 31, 2001 was $118.5 million and $43.8 million, respectively.
Special Charges. Special charges of $2.9 million were recognized during 2000 for activities related to the consolidation of certain
operations within our Electronics Group. The consolidation activities were completed in 2000 and no such charges were recognized in
Net revenue for our Electronics Group in 2001 was $207.3 million, an increase of $25.2 million, or 13.8%, from $182.1 million in
2001.
2000. The increase in net revenue was primarily from contracts with aerospace and defense customers for manufacturing
services, which generated an increase of $28.7 million in 2001 over the prior year. Other outsourced services accounted for an
increase in net revenue of $0.5 million during 2001. Product sales accounted for a decrease in net revenue of $4.0 million during
2001, primarily due to reduced sales quantities for data systems products.
Interest Expense, Net.
Interest expense in 2001 was $4.1 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 1.9%, from $4.0 million in 2000.
Interest expense attributable to increased borrowings during 2001 was offset by a reduction in interest rates and the capitalization
of interest incurred on our Industrial Group’s capital expenditure program. Our weighted average debt outstanding increased to
approximately $74.5 million during 2001 from approximately $58.7 million in 2000. This increase reflected the $11.5 million
Net revenue for our Industrial Group in 2001 was $47.3 million, an increase of $12.8 million, or 37.5%, from $34.5 million in 2000.
acquisition from Dana made by our Industrial Group in May 2001 and capital expenditures during 2000 and 2001 to support new
During May 2001, we entered into a new long-term contract with Dana, including the acquisition of certain manufacturing assets
business opportunities. The weighted average interest rate in 2001 was approximately 7.4% as compared to approximately 8.5%
and inventory from Dana for approximately $11.5 million in cash. The assets are used to produce fully machined, medium and
for the prior year. Capitalized interest in 2001 was $1.8 million as compared to $0.9 million in 2000.
heavy-duty truck axle shafts and other drive train components for integration into subassemblies produced for leading truck
manufacturers. This business generated outsourced services revenue of $17.7 million during 2001. Excluding the acquisition, the
Industrial Group’s net revenue declined $4.9 million in 2001 from the prior year. The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to
a decline in outsourced services provided to customers in the heavy-duty truck market. Unfavorable market conditions that arose
during the second half of 2000 for heavy-duty truck production resulted in an industry-wide market decrease of approximately
40% by the second half of 2001 and reduced the volume of axles we supplied to that market.
Income Taxes.
Income tax expense was $2.9 million in 2001 as compared to an income tax benefit of $1.4 million in 2000. The
effective tax rate in 2001 was 31.4%. The effective tax rate for 2001 and the income tax benefit in 2000 reflect research and
development tax credits, Extraterritorial Income Exclusion tax benefits and a reduction in our valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets. The reduction in the valuation allowance for 2001 and 2000 was $0.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2001 was $43.5 million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 8.0%, from $40.3 million in 2000. Gross
Net cash provided by operating activities was $13.6 million in 2002, as compared to $8.5 million in 2001, primarily due to an
margin in 2001 declined to 17.1% from 18.6% in 2000.
Gross profit for our Electronics Group in 2001 was $37.4 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.1%, from $36.3 million in 2000.
increase in net income and deferred income taxes and a decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by contributions to
pension plans. On November 27, 2002, we made a voluntary contribution to the pension plans totaling $5.7 million.
The increase in manufacturing services revenue generated an increase in gross profit of $3.8 million, while gross profit from other
Net cash used in investing activities was $20.2 million in 2002 as compared to $32.9 million in 2001. Capital expenditures for our
outsourced services decreased $0.6 million. Gross margin in 2001 declined to 18.0% from 19.9% in 2000. Manufacturing services
Electronics Group and Industrial Group totaled $7.5 million and $12.0 million, respectively, in 2002. Capital expenditures for our
comprised approximately 59% of our Electronics Group’s revenue in 2001 as compared to approximately 51% in 2000. Gross
Electronics Group were principally comprised of manufacturing, assembly and test equipment. Our Industrial Group’s capital
margin from manufacturing services improved slightly over the prior year; however, since gross margin on manufacturing
expenditures included new forging and machining equipment to increase and expand the range of production capabilities.
30 SYPR
SYPR 31
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
Management(cid:146)s Discussion and Analysis
Our Industrial Group invested $12.0 million, $19.5 million and $15.5 million during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, in facilities,
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
equipment and systems to support our growth in the truck components and assemblies market. We substantially completed the
investments for this growth during 2002, which provides us with the capacity to serve the requirements of our existing multi-year
contracts with ArvinMeritor, Dana and Visteon. The Industrial Group’s acquisition of certain assets related to the Dana contract for
$11.5 million was included in investing activities in 2001.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $5.8 million during 2002 as compared to $23.0 million in 2001. We received net
proceeds of $55.7 million from our public stock offering during March and April 2002. Prior to the offering, we reduced debt by $5.0
million and proceeds from the offering were used to reduce debt by an additional $45.5 million in 2002. Dividends paid in 2002
totaled $0.4 million.
Subject to certain loan covenants, we had total availability for borrowings and letters of credit under the revolving credit facility of
$87.8 million at December 31, 2002, which, when combined with the cash balance of $12.4 million, provides for total cash and
borrowing capacity of $100.4 million. Our borrowing capacity was increased by $25.0 million in July 2002, as we agreed with our
bank group to raise maximum borrowings on the revolving credit facility from $100.0 million to $125.0 million. Other terms of the
credit agreement remained substantially unchanged. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to finance working
capital requirements, acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures. Most acquisitions require the
approval of our bank group.
Our principal commitments at December 31, 2002 consisted of repayments of borrowings under the credit agreement and obligations
under operating leases for certain of our real property and equipment. We also had purchase commitments totaling approximately
$2.8 million at December 31, 2002, primarily for manufacturing equipment. The following table provides information about the
payment dates of our contractual obligations at December 31, 2002, excluding current liabilities except for the current portion of
long-term debt:
Revolving credit facility
Operating leases
Total
$
2003
7,000
6,935
$ 13,935
2004
—
6,468
2005
$ 30,000
5,753
6,468
$ 35,753
$
$
2006
—
5,179
5,179
$
$
(in thousands)
2008 &
2007
Thereafter
$
$
—
9,537
9,537
$
$
—
138
138
We believe that sufficient resources will be available to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. Cash
requirements for periods beyond the next twelve months depend on our profitability, ability to manage working capital requirements
Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended
by SFAS No. 137 and 138. SFAS No. 133, and its subsequent amendments, requires us to recognize all derivatives on the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the
derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the
change in fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value must be recognized
currently in earnings. In 2001, we entered into interest rate swap agreements, which are deemed to be effective hedges in
accordance with SFAS No. 133.
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and
indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but will be reviewed at least annually for impairment. Separable
intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No.
144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed
Of," and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of
Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions." SFAS No. 144 requires one accounting model to be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale,
whether previously held or used or newly acquired, and it broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more
disposal transactions. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not impact our financial statements in 2002.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
On July 26, 2001, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a syndicate of banks that effectively convert a portion of our
variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 4.52%, excluding our applicable margin, through July 2003. We entered into interest rate swap
agreements as a means to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. Approximately 81% ($30.0
million) of our outstanding debt was covered under the interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2002. We are exposed to
financial market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the borrowings included
in the interest rate swap agreements, all other borrowings under our credit agreement bear interest at a variable rate based on the
prime rate, the London Interbank Offered Rate, or certain alternative short-term rates, plus a margin (1.0% at December 31, 2002)
based upon our leverage ratio. An increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in additional interest expense of
approximately $70,000 on an annualized basis, based upon our debt outstanding at December 31, 2002. The vast majority of our
transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. As such, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have historically had little
impact on us. Inflation has not been a significant factor in our operations in any of the periods presented and it is not expected to
and rate of growth. If we make significant acquisitions or if working capital and capital expenditure requirements exceed expected
affect operations in the foreseeable future.
levels during the next twelve months or in subsequent periods, we may require additional external sources of capital. There can be
no assurance that any additional required financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt or equity financings or
Forward Looking Statements
otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available on
This annual report may contain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
acceptable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Outlook
The short-term outlook for several of our Electronics Group’s aerospace and defense customers is becoming less certain as these
customers compete for funds that appear to be increasingly redirected to support the deployment of the U.S. military to the Middle
East. After the expected appropriation of funds for the war effort by Congress, however, we believe the outlook for this portion of
our business will regain its momentum. As a result, comparable period growth in our Electronics Group is not expected to occur
until the second half of 2003 as shipments are expected to increase on certain aerospace and defense contracts.
Our Industrial Group expects a steady recovery in the production of medium and heavy-duty trucks during the second half of 2003.
The late 2002 decline in the heavy-duty truck market is expected to stabilize during the first half of 2003 and increase over the
balance of the year. This anticipated rebound in the heavy-duty truck market, combined with an expected increase in volume from
supplying additional parts to our existing customers and the full year impact of the Visteon contract, is expected to result in an
increase in our Industrial Group’s revenue in 2003.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These projections and statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and
financial performance. No assurance can be given, however, that these events will occur or that these projections will be achieved
and actual results could differ materially from those projected as a result of certain factors. These factors include our dependence
on our current management; the risks and uncertainties present in our business, including changes in laws or regulations; business
conditions and growth in the general economy and the electronics and industrial markets served by us; competitive factors and
price pressures; availability of third party component parts at reasonable prices; inventory risks due to shifts in market demand
and/or price erosion of purchased components; changes in product mix; cost and yield issues associated with our manufacturing
facilities; the ability to successfully manage growth; the effects (including possible increases in the cost of doing business) resulting
from future war and terrorists activities or political uncertainties; as well as other factors included in our periodic reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
32 SYPR
SYPR 33
Consolidated Income Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Years ended December 31,
Net revenue:
Outsourced services
Products
Total net revenue
Cost of sales:
Outsourced services
Products
Total cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Amortization of intangible assets
Special charges
Operating income
Interest expense, net
Other income, net
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Shares used in computing earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
(in thousands, except for per share data)
2002
2001
2000
$
229,629
$
209,874
$
168,216
43,848
44,766
48,355
273,477
254,640
216,571
195,576
28,380
181,818
29,275
145,059
31,199
December 31,
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Inventory, net
Other current assets
Total current assets
223,956
211,093
176,258
Property, plant and equipment, net
49,521
27,114
3,354
97
—
18,956
2,742
(159)
16,373
4,934
11,439
0.87
0.84
13,117
13,664
$
$
$
43,547
26,134
3,054
1,329
—
13,030
4,111
(358)
9,277
2,910
6,367
0.65
0.63
9,828
10,028
$
$
$
40,313
26,881
3,574
1,436
2,945
5,477
4,035
(344)
1,786
(1,398)
3,184
0.33
0.32
9,671
9,964
$
$
$
Goodwill
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 981,600 and 989,000 shares
authorized in 2002 and 2001, respectively; no shares issued
Series A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 18,400 shares and
11,000 shares authorized in 2002 and 2001, respectively; no shares issued
Common stock, non-voting, par value $.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 30,000,000 and 20,000,000 shares
authorized in 2002 and 2001, respectively; 14,158,077 and 9,898,675 shares
issued and outstanding in 2002 and 2001, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
(in thousands, except for share data)
2002
2001
$
$
12,403
37,951
64,443
9,187
13,232
39,758
60,574
7,991
123,984
121,555
75,305
14,277
10,039
70,452
14,277
5,160
$
223,605
$
211,444
$
$
23,356
16,035
7,000
46,391
30,000
10,179
26,828
19,902
7,500
54,230
80,000
7,094
86,570
141,324
—
—
—
—
—
—
142
82,575
57,017
(2,699)
99
25,490
46,427
(1,896)
137,035
70,120
$
223,605
$
211,444
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
34 SYPR
SYPR 35
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders(cid:146) Equity
Years ended December 31,
2002
2001
2000
(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
Provision for doubtful accounts
Other noncash charges
Contributions to pension plans
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Other current assets
Accounts payable
Accrued and other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
Purchase of the net assets of acquired entities
Proceeds from sale of assets
Changes in nonoperating assets and liabilities
$
11,439
$
6,367
$
3,184
11,386
3,684
727
231
339
(7,451)
1,576
(4,559)
(863)
(1,010)
(1,898)
13,601
(19,747)
—
211
(662)
9,856
479
432
122
59
(754)
(8,474)
(3,519)
(416)
3,648
671
8,471
(27,623)
(11,486)
6,816
(650)
9,351
(2,478)
453
18
202
(1,181)
(8,121)
(2,046)
(344)
9,274
(180)
8,132
(23,886)
—
9,292
(351)
Net cash used in investing activities
(20,198)
(32,943)
(14,945)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in debt under revolving credit agreements
Cash dividends paid
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(50,500)
(424)
56,692
5,768
(829)
22,500
10,600
—
530
—
481
23,030
11,081
(1,442)
4,268
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
13,232
14,674
10,406
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
12,403
$
13,232
$
14,674
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
(in thousands, except for share data)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Retained
Earnings
Balance at January 1, 2000
9,589,214
$
Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension liability
Comprehensive income (loss)
Issuance of shares under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
Exercise of stock options
—
—
—
35,290
85,165
Balance at December 31, 2000
9,709,669
Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension liability,
net of tax of $828
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements, net of tax of $309
Comprehensive income (loss)
Issuance of shares under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Exercise of stock options
Stock option tax benefit
—
—
—
—
52,206
136,800
—
Balance at December 31, 2001
9,898,675
Net income
Adjustment in minimum pension liability,
net of tax of $582
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
agreements, net of tax of $99
Comprehensive income (loss)
Cash dividends, $0.06 per common share
Issuance of common shares
Issuance of shares under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Exercise of stock options
Stock option tax benefit
Retire unvested restricted shares
—
—
—
—
—
4,100,000
37,695
123,983
—
(2,276)
96
—
—
—
—
1
97
—
—
—
—
1
1
—
99
—
—
—
—
—
41
1
1
—
—
$ 23,921
$ 36,876
$
(73)
$
60,820
—
—
—
273
207
3,184
—
3,184
—
—
—
(280)
(280)
—
—
3,184
(280)
2,904
273
208
24,401
40,060
(353)
64,205
—
—
—
—
256
566
267
6,367
—
6,367
—
(1,124)
(1,124)
—
6,367
(419)
(1,543)
(419)
4,824
—
—
—
—
—
—
257
567
267
25,490
46,427
(1,896)
70,120
—
—
—
—
—
55,615
335
758
377
—
11,439
—
11,439
—
(873)
(873)
—
11,439
(849)
—
—
—
—
—
70
(803)
—
—
—
—
—
—
70
10,636
(849)
55,656
336
759
377
—
Balance at December 31, 2002
14,158,077
$
142
$ 82,575
$ 57,017
$
(2,699)
$ 137,035
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
36 SYPR
SYPR 37
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation Policy
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (collectively, "Sypris" or the "Company"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Nature of Business
Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The Company performs a wide range of
manufacturing, engineering, design, testing, and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with
corporations and government agencies in the markets for aerospace and defense electronics, truck components and assemblies,
and for users of test and measurement equipment.
As of January 1, 2002, the Company changed the name of its four major operating subsidiaries as part of a comprehensive
branding initiative. The new names of the four subsidiaries are Sypris Data Systems, Inc., formerly Metrum-Datatape, Inc.; Sypris
Electronics, LLC, formerly Group Technologies Corporation; Sypris Technologies, Inc., formerly Tube Turns Technologies, Inc.; and
Sypris Test and Measurement, Inc., formerly Bell Technologies, Inc., all of which are located in the U.S.
Use of Estimates
Revenue Recognition
A portion of the Company’s business is conducted under long-term, fixed-price contracts with aerospace and defense companies
and agencies of the U.S. Government. Contract revenue is generally included in the consolidated income statements as units are
completed and shipped using the units of delivery, percentage of completion method of accounting. The costs attributed to contract
revenue are based upon the estimated average costs of all units to be shipped. The cumulative average costs of units shipped to
date are adjusted through current operations as estimates of future costs to complete change (see "Contract Accounting" below).
Revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting totaled approximately $120,424,000, $134,478,000
and $105,535,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Substantially all such amounts were
accounted for under the units of delivery method. All other revenue is recognized as product is shipped and title passes, or when
services are rendered.
Contract Accounting
For long-term contracts, the Company capitalizes in inventory direct material, direct labor and factory overhead as incurred. The
Company also capitalizes certain general and administrative costs for estimating and bidding on contracts awarded (of which
approximately $105,000 and $210,000 remained in inventory at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively). Selling costs are
expensed as incurred. Costs to complete long-term contracts are estimated on a monthly basis. Estimated margins at completion
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.
are applied to cumulative contract revenue to arrive at costs charged to operations.
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents
Accounting for long-term contracts under the percentage of completion method involves substantial estimation processes,
including determining the estimated cost to complete a contract. As contracts may require performance over several accounting
periods, formal detailed costs-to-complete estimates are performed and updated monthly via performance reports. Management’s
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
estimates of costs-to-complete change due to internal and external factors, such as labor rate and efficiency variances, revised
Inventory
Contract inventory is stated at actual production costs, reduced by the cost of units for which revenue has been recognized. Gross
contract inventory is considered work in process. Progress payments under long-term contracts are specified in the contracts as a
estimates of warranty costs, estimated future material prices and customer specification and testing requirement changes. Changes
in estimated costs are reflected in gross profit in the period in which they are known. If increases in projected costs-to-complete are
sufficient to create a loss contract, the entire estimated loss is charged to operations in the period the loss first becomes known.
percentage of cost and are liquidated as contract items are completed and shipped. Other inventory is stated at the lower of cost or
Product Warranty Costs
market. The first-in, first-out method was used for determining the cost of inventory excluding contract inventory and certain other
The provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. The
inventory, which was determined using the last-in, first-out method ("LIFO") (see Note 5). The Company’s reserve for excess and
obsolete inventory is primarily based upon forecasted demand for its product sales, and any change to the reserve arising from
forecast revisions is reflected in cost of sales in the period the revision is made.
Property, Plant and Equipment
accrued liability for warranty costs is included in the caption "Accrued liabilities" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of accounts receivable. The
Company’s customer base consists of various departments or agencies of the U.S. Government, aerospace and defense companies
Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is generally computed
under contract with the U.S. Government and a number of customers in diverse industries across geographic areas, primarily in
using the straight-line method over their estimated economic lives. For land improvements, buildings and building improvements,
the estimated economic life is generally 40 years. Estimated economic lives range from three to fifteen years for machinery,
North America. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and does not require
collateral on its commercial accounts receivable. Credit losses are provided for in the consolidated financial statements and
equipment, furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the respective lease term using the straight-line
consistently have been within management’s expectations. Approximately 56% of accounts receivable outstanding at December 31,
method. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are expensed as incurred. Major renewals and
2002 are due from four of the Company’s largest customers.
improvements are capitalized.
The Company recognized revenue from contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies of approximately $44,185,000,
Interest cost is capitalized for qualifying assets during the period in which the asset is being installed and prepared for its intended
$40,046,000 and $45,467,000 during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company’s largest
use. Capitalized interest cost is amortized on the same basis as the related depreciation.
Goodwill
Beginning in 2002 with the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead tested at least annually for impairment. Prior to 2002, goodwill was
amortized using the straight-line method over its estimated period of benefit of 15 years (see "Adoption of Recently Issued
Accounting Standards"). Goodwill is reported net of accumulated amortization totaling $4,146,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Long-lived Assets
Consistent with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the Company evaluates long-lived
assets for impairment and assesses their recoverability based upon anticipated future cash flows. If facts and circumstances lead the
Company’s management to believe that the cost of one of its assets may be impaired, the Company will write down that carrying
amount to fair value to the extent necessary (see "Adoption of Recently Issued Accounting Standards").
customers for the year ended December 31, 2002 were Raytheon Company and Dana Corporation, which represented
approximately 19% and 14%, respectively, of the Company’s total net revenue. The Company’s largest customers for the year
ended December 31, 2001 were Raytheon Company and Honeywell International, Inc., which represented approximately 21% and
11%, respectively, of the Company’s total net revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company’s largest customer
was Raytheon Company, which represented approximately 15% of the Company’s total net revenue. No other single customer
accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 or 2000.
38 SYPR
SYPR 39
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock Based Compensation
There has been no change to the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill since January 1, 2002. Goodwill, net of accumulated
Stock options are granted under various stock compensation programs to employees and independent directors (see Note 12).
amortization, at December 31, 2002 for the Electronics Group and the Industrial Group was approximately $13,837,000 and $440,000,
The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
respectively. The Company’s other intangible assets subject to amortization and the related amortization expense are not material to
Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"). For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to
the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, respectively.
expense over the options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information is as follows:
Years ended December 31,
Net income
Pro forma stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
Pro forma net income
Pro forma earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Derivative Financial Instruments
(in thousands, except for per share data)
2002
2001
2000
$ 11,439
$
6,367
$
3,184
1,591
9,848
0.75
0.72
$
$
$
1,390
4,977
0.51
0.50
$
$
$
1,098
2,086
0.22
0.21
$
$
$
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" and issued its amendments, SFAS No. 137 and 138, in June 1999 and June 2000, respectively. SFAS No. 133, and its
subsequent amendments, required the Company to recognize all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value beginning
January 1, 2001. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending
on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities,
or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value must be recognized currently in earnings. In 2001, the Company entered
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."
SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of
Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions." SFAS No. 144 requires one accounting model to be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale,
whether previously held or used or newly acquired, and it broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more
disposal transactions. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not impact the Company’s financial statements in 2002.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the 2002 classification, none of
which had an effect on previously reported net income.
Note 2. Acquisitions and Mergers
On May 31, 2001, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Marion Forge plant from Dana Corporation. The
business produces fully machined, medium and heavy-duty truck axle shafts and other drive components for integration into
subassemblies and is included with Sypris Technologies in the Industrial Group. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase,
in which the purchase price of $11,486,000 was allocated based on the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired. The results
of operations of the acquired business have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. The
acquisition was financed by the Company’s Credit Agreement (see Note 8).
into interest rate swap agreements, which are deemed to be effective hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133 (see Note 8).
Note 3. Special Charges
Adoption of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated
after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. SFAS No. 141 also specifies criteria for the
recognition of identifiable intangible assets separately from goodwill. We will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141 to all future
business combinations. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 on July 1, 2001 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under SFAS No. 142,
goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but will be reviewed at least annually for impairment.
Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.
The nonamortization of goodwill has increased the Company’s net income and earnings per share beginning in 2002. Following
are pro forma results assuming goodwill had not been amortized prior to January 1, 2002:
Years ended December 31,
Reported net income
Adjustment for amortization of goodwill, net of tax
Adjusted net income
Basic earnings per common share as reported
Adjustment for amortization of goodwill, net of tax
Adjusted basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share as reported
Adjustment for amortization of goodwill, net of tax
Adjusted diluted earnings per common share
(in thousands, except for per share data)
2002
$ 11,439
—
$ 11,439
$
$
$
$
0.87
—
0.87
0.84
—
0.84
2001
6,367
782
7,149
0.65
0.08
0.73
0.63
0.08
0.71
$
$
$
$
$
$
2000
3,184
782
3,966
0.33
0.08
0.41
0.32
0.08
0.40
$
$
$
$
$
$
Special charges of $2,945,000 were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2000 for activities related to the consolidation
of certain operations within the Electronics Group. The special charges incurred and paid during 2000 include workforce reductions,
related severance and other benefit costs of $1,211,000, facilities rearrangement and relocation costs of $480,000, and employment
costs related to the transfer of production of $1,254,000. The workforce reductions resulted in the termination of 48 employees
involved in manufacturing, engineering, sales and administrative activities during 2000.
Note 4. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consists of the following:
December 31,
Commercial
U.S. Government
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(in thousands)
2002
2001
$ 34,108
4,366
$ 34,658
5,875
38,474
40,533
(523)
(775)
$ 37,951
$ 39,758
Accounts receivable from the U.S. Government includes amounts due under long-term contracts, all of which are billed at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, of $2,930,000 and $2,939,000, respectively.
40 SYPR
SYPR 41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5.
Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
December 31,
Raw materials
Work in process
Finished goods
Costs relating to long-term contracts and programs, net of amounts
attributed to revenue recognized to date
Progress payments related to long-term contracts and programs
LIFO reserve
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory
(in thousands)
2002
2001
$ 18,493
14,769
4,588
$ 16,753
11,911
5,450
34,778
(2,737)
(1,007)
(4,441)
37,908
(6,540)
(987)
(3,921)
Note 8. Long-Term Debt
The Company has a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks (the "Credit Agreement") that was entered into in October 1999
and amended most recently in July 2002. The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility with an aggregate
commitment of $125,000,000 through January 2005. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, interest rates are determined at the
time of borrowing and are based on the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 1.0% to 3.25%; or the greater of the prime
rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, plus a margin up to 0.75%. The Company also pays a fee of 0.2% to 0.5% on the unused
portion of the aggregate commitment. The margins applied to the respective interest rates and the commitment fee are adjusted
quarterly and are based on the Company’s ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
The weighted average interest rate for outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2002 was 6.5%. The weighted average interest
rates for borrowings during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were 5.8%, 7.4% and 8.5%, respectively. Current
maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2002 and 2001 represent amounts due under a short-term borrowing arrangement
included in the Credit Agreement. Standby letters of credit up to a maximum of $15,000,000 may be issued under the Credit
The preceding amounts include inventory valued under the LIFO method that totaled approximately $12,663,000 and $9,141,000 at
maintenance of specified fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios and minimum levels of net worth. As of December 31, 2002,
$ 64,443
$ 60,574
Agreement, and no significant amounts were outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants requiring the
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Note 6. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
December 31,
Land and land improvements
Buildings and building improvements
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures
Construction in progress
Accumulated depreciation
(in thousands)
2002
2001
$
1,736
19,132
119,740
6,201
$
1,436
17,837
96,674
19,858
146,809
(71,504)
135,805
(65,353)
$ 75,305
$ 70,452
Depreciation expense totaled approximately $11,280,000, $8,468,000 and $7,906,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000, respectively. At December 31, 2002, approximately $494,000 was included in accounts payable for capital expenditures. At
December 31, 2001, approximately $2,782,000 and $612,000 was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, respectively,
for capital expenditures.
Note 7. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consists of the following:
December 31,
Employee benefit plan accruals
Salaries, wages and incentives
Other
$
2002
4,585
3,735
7,715
(in thousands)
$
2001
6,308
3,925
9,669
the Company was in compliance with all covenants. The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all assets of the Company,
including but not limited to accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and real estate, and is also guaranteed by the subsidiaries
of the Company. The Company met requirements for the release of asset collateralization as of December 31, 2002, and anticipates
it will be released during the first quarter of 2003.
On July 26, 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with three banks that effectively convert a portion of its
floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis for a period of two years, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest
expense. The swap agreements have a combined notional amount of $30,000,000 whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of
interest of 4.52% and receives a variable 30-day LIBOR rate. The differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates
change and is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in the consolidated income statement. The aggregate fair market
value of all interest rate swap agreements was approximately $559,000 and $728,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
On the consolidated balance sheet, these amounts were included in accrued liabilities and other liabilities at December 2002 and
2001, respectively, with a corresponding charge, net of tax, to other comprehensive income.
Interest incurred, net of amounts capitalized, during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 totaled approximately
$2,923,000, $4,021,000 and $4,206,000, respectively. The Company had no capitalized interest in 2002. Capitalized interest for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $1,763,000 and $910,000, respectively. Interest paid during the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 totaled approximately $2,763,000, $5,623,000 and $5,063,000, respectively.
Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial statements at their
carrying amount which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount of
debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001 under the Credit Agreement approximates fair value because borrowings are for
terms less than six months and have rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt. The Company uses
interest rate swap agreements (see Note 8) to minimize its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates for a portion of the debt. The
fair value of the swap agreements is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
Note 10. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (the "Pension Plans") covering certain employees of Sypris
Included in other accrued liabilities are employee payroll deductions, advance payments, accrued operating expenses, accrued
warranty expenses, accrued interest and other items, none of which exceed 5% of total current liabilities.
and management employees provide pension benefits that are based on the employees’ highest five-year average compensation
within ten years before retirement. The Pension Plans covering hourly employees and union members generally provide benefits
at stated amounts for each year of service. The Company’s funding policy is to make the minimum annual contributions required
by the applicable regulations; however, on November 27, 2002, the Company made a voluntary contribution to the Pension Plans
totaling $5,660,000. The Pension Plans’ assets are primarily invested in equity securities and fixed income securities.
$ 16,035
$ 19,902
Technologies, including certain employees of the operation acquired from Dana in May 2001. The Pension Plans covering salaried
42 SYPR
SYPR 43
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table details the components of pension expense:
Years ended December 31,
Service cost
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
Net amortizations and deferrals
Expected return on plan assets
(in thousands)
2002
2001
2000
$
172
2,306
339
(2,329)
$
358
1,939
247
(1,961)
$
180
1,409
222
(1,338)
$
488
$
583
$
473
The following are summaries of the changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets and of the funded status of the Pension Plans:
December 31,
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Benefit obligation assumed in acquisition
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial loss
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of year
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Fair value of plan assets acquired in acquisition
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status of the plans:
Benefit obligation at end of year
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status of plan (underfunded)
Unrecognized actuarial loss
Unrecognized prior service cost
Net asset (liability) recognized
Balance sheet assets (liabilities):
Accrued benefit liability
Prepaid benefit cost
Intangible asset
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Net asset (liability) recognized
Assumptions at year end:
Discount rate used in determining present values
Rate of compensation increase
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
(in thousands)
2002
2001
$ 31,983
—
172
2,306
2,394
(1,618)
$ 19,096
11,547
358
1,939
463
(1,420)
$ 35,237
$ 31,983
$ 24,789
—
(1,142)
7,451
(1,618)
$ 15,156
10,457
(158)
754
(1,420)
$ 29,480
$ 24,789
$ 35,237
29,480
$ 31,983
24,789
(5,757)
8,074
694
(7,194)
2,339
903
3,011
$
(3,952)
(5,661)
4,876
36
3,760
$
(7,160)
—
903
2,305
$
$
$
3,011
$
(3,952)
6.75%
4.00%
8.50%
7.50%
4.00%
9.50%
The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan (the "Defined Contribution Plan") for substantially all employees of the Company.
The Defined Contribution Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Defined
Contribution Plan allows the Company to match participant contributions and provides discretionary contributions. Contributions to
the Defined Contribution Plan in 2002, 2001 and 2000 totaled approximately $2,267,000, $1,933,000 and $2,278,000, respectively.
The Company has self-insured medical plans (the "Medical Plans") covering substantially all employees. The number of employees
participating in the Medical Plans was approximately 1,300, 1,350 and 1,300 at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The
Medical Plans limit the Company’s annual obligations to fund claims to specified amounts per participant and in the aggregate. The
Company is adequately insured for amounts in excess of these limits. Employees are responsible for payment of a portion of the
premiums. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company charged approximately $6,677,000, $5,890,000 and $4,456,000, respectively, to
operations related to reinsurance premiums, medical claims incurred and estimated, and administrative costs for the Medical Plans.
Claims paid during 2002, 2001 and 2000 did not exceed the aggregate limits.
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases certain of its real property and certain equipment, vehicles and computer hardware under operating leases
with terms ranging from month-to-month to ten years and which contain various renewal and rent escalation clauses. Future
minimum annual lease commitments under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of
one year as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008 and thereafter
(in thousands)
$
6,935
6,468
5,753
5,179
9,537
138
$ 34,010
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 totaled approximately $7,387,000, $5,550,000 and $3,650,000,
respectively.
The Company entered into agreements for the sale and leaseback of certain specific manufacturing and testing equipment during
2001 and 2000. The terms of the operating leases range from five to nine years and the Company has the option to purchase the
equipment at the expiration of the respective lease term at a fixed price based upon the equipment’s estimated residual value. Lease
payments on these operating leases are guaranteed by the Company. Proceeds from the sale and leaseback transactions during 2001
and 2000 were approximately $5,420,000 and $9,251,000, respectively, and the transactions resulted in a deferred loss for the years
ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 of approximately $787,000 and $351,000, respectively, that is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the term of the respective leases. As of December 31, 2002, the deferred loss net of amortization was approximately $1,039,000.
Future minimum annual lease commitments related to these leases are included in the above schedule.
As of December 31, 2002, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $2,800,000, primarily for the
acquisition of manufacturing equipment.
The Company’s Sypris Technologies subsidiary is a co-defendant in a lawsuit arising out of an explosion at a coker plant owned by
Exxon Mobil Corporation located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. In this lawsuit, it is alleged that a carbon steel pipe elbow that Sypris
Technologies manufactured was improperly installed and the failure of which caused the explosion. In the third quarter of 2002, the
Company obtained a summary judgment in its favor, which is now final and nonappealable, in a related lawsuit brought by Exxon
Mobil in 1994 in state district court in Louisiana claiming damages for destruction of the plant. The pending action is a class action
suit also filed in 1994 in federal court in Louisiana on behalf of the residents living around the plant and claims unspecified damages.
Sypris Technologies is a co-defendant in this action with Exxon Mobil, the contractor and the fabricator. In this action, the Company
maintains that the carbon steel pipe elbow at issue was appropriately marked as carbon steel and was improperly installed, without
Sypris Technologies’ knowledge, by the fabricator and general contractor in circumstances that required the use of a chromium steel
elbow. As to all claims in the pending suit, the Company has received favorable summary judgment rulings, but some of such
rulings remain subject to appeal. The Company is optimistic that the judgments in its favor will be upheld or become final.
44 SYPR
SYPR 45
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of
The Company’s stock compensation program also provides for the grant of performance-based stock options to key employees
these matters cannot, at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein, management does not expect that
("Performance Options"). The terms and conditions of the Performance Options grants provide for the determination of the exercise
these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
price and the beginning of the vesting period to occur when the fair market value of the Company’s common stock achieves certain
Note 12. Stock Option and Purchase Plans
targeted price levels. The Company did not grant Performance Options in 2002. Performance Options to purchase 56,000 shares
and 108,000 shares of common stock were granted during 2001 and 2000, respectively. Performance Options to purchase 49,000
The Company has certain stock compensation plans under which options to purchase common stock may be granted to officers,
shares, 32,000 shares and 112,000 shares of common stock were forfeited in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. One targeted price
key employees and non-employee directors. Options may be granted at not less than the market price on the date of grant. Options
level of the Performance Options was achieved in 2002, resulting in determination of the exercise price and beginning of the
are exercisable in whole or in part up to two years after the date of grant and ending ten years after the date of grant. The following
vesting period for options to purchase 52,000 shares of common stock. Performance Options for which the targeted price level has
table summarizes option activity for the three years ended December 31, 2002:
not been achieved total 315,000 shares, 416,000 shares and 392,000 shares at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and
Balance at January 1, 2000
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2000
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2001
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2002
Shares
1,312,460
518,746
(114,246)
(163,223)
1,553,737
632,819
(164,616)
(174,980)
1,846,960
362,391
(127,561)
(144,425)
$
Exercise
Price Range
1.72 - 31.00
6.56 - 10.50
2.76 - 8.75
4.24 - 10.50
1.72 - 31.00
3.88 - 13.27
1.72 - 8.75
6.25 - 11.76
1.72 - 31.00
9.95 - 19.00
1.72 - 10.50
6.25 - 16.03
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 6.71
9.52
4.08
7.20
7.79
6.15
3.06
8.21
7.61
14.32
6.23
9.39
are excluded from disclosures of options outstanding.
The aggregate number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock compensation programs as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001 was 4,750,000 and 3,000,000, respectively. The aggregate number of shares available for future grant
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 was 2,013,261 and 380,227, respectively. Shares available for future grant as of December 31,
2002 includes 141,550 shares of common stock related to stock options that may be subject to future grant under certain of the
Company’s incentive plans based upon the achievement of certain financial targets and individual performance objectives and
action by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The Company applies APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below,
the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," requires use of
option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25, when the exercise
price of the Company’s employee stock options is at least equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no
compensation expense is recognized.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if
the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for options
granted by the Company during 2002, 2001 and 2000 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing
1,937,365
$
1.72 - 31.00
$ 8.83
model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
The following table summarizes certain weighted average data for options outstanding and currently exercisable at December 31, 2002:
Outstanding
Exercisable
Exercise Price Range
Shares
Price
Life
Shares
Weighted Average
Remaining
Exercise
Contractual
$1.72 - $5.00
$5.12 - $7.00
$7.37 - $10.00
$10.06 - $15.00
$15.59 - $20.00
$23.00 - $31.00
Total
184,402
490,693
753,351
406,881
96,550
5,488
$
3.84
6.16
8.68
12.34
17.24
27.38
1,937,365
$
8.83
5.0
6.1
5.0
6.5
8.0
2.3
5.7
155,027
41,218
484,601
56,442
51,550
5,488
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 3.65
6.34
8.72
11.24
18.30
27.38
Years ended December 31,
Expected life (years)
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rates
Expected dividend yield
2002
7
74.79%
3.83%
1.09%
2001
8
75.20%
4.93%
—
2000
8
70.30%
4.98%
—
The weighted average Black-Scholes value of options granted under the stock option plans during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $9.39,
$4.71 and $7.05 per share, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions
including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its
794,326
$ 8.54
employee stock options.
The Company has a stock purchase plan that provides substantially all employees who have satisfied the eligibility requirements
the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock on a compensation deduction basis. The purchase price is the
lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last business day of the purchase period. Payroll
deductions may not exceed $6,000 for any six-month cycle. The stock purchase plan expires January 31, 2006. At December 31,
2002 and 2001, there were 159,209 shares and 196,904 shares, respectively, available for purchase under the plan. During 2002,
2001 and 2000, a total of 37,695 shares, 52,206 shares and 35,290 shares, respectively, were issued under the plan.
46 SYPR
SYPR 47
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity
Note 14.
Income Taxes
On March 26, 2002, the Company completed a public stock offering of 3,600,000 shares of its common stock and, on April 19, 2002,
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Accordingly, deferred
an additional 500,000 shares were issued through the exercise of an over-allotment option. The shares were sold at $14.50 per
income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between the recognition of revenue and expenses for financial and income
share and generated proceeds, after underwriting discounts and expenses, of approximately $55,656,000. Proceeds from the
tax reporting purposes and between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements.
offering were primarily used to repay debt. On May 7, 2002, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to increase the
Company’s authorized common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 30,000,000 shares.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
On September 12, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors declared an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 (three cents)
per common share outstanding that was paid on November 15, 2002. On October 29, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors
declared an additional quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 (three cents) per common share outstanding. The dividend was paid on
January 10, 2003.
The Company has a stockholder rights plan, under which each stockholder owns one right for each outstanding share of common
stock owned. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of a new series of preferred stock at an
exercise price of $63.00. The rights trade along with, and not separately from, the shares of common stock unless they become
exercisable. If any person or group acquires or makes a tender offer for 15% or more of the common stock of the Company (except
in transactions approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in advance) the rights become exercisable, and they will separate,
become tradable, and entitle stockholders, other than such person or group, to acquire, at the exercise price, preferred stock with a
market value equal to twice the exercise price. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination with such
person or group, or if 50% of its earning power or assets are sold to such person or group, each right will entitle its holder, other
than such person or group, to acquire, at the exercise price, shares of the acquiring company’s common stock with a market value
Years ended December 31,
Current:
Federal
State
Other
Deferred:
Federal
State
(in thousands)
2002
2001
2000
$
1,184
45
21
1,250
3,427
257
3,684
$
2,161
255
15
2,431
706
(227)
479
$
969
102
9
1,080
(2,351)
(127)
(2,478)
$
4,934
$
2,910
$
(1,398)
of twice the exercise price. The rights will expire on October 23, 2011, unless redeemed or exchanged earlier by the Company, and
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return which includes all subsidiaries. Income taxes paid during 2002, 2001
will be represented by existing common stock certificates until they become exercisable.
As of December 31, 2002, 18,400 shares of the Company’s preferred stock were designated as Series A Preferred Stock in
and 2000 totaled approximately $3,656,000, $1,962,000 and $1,347,000, respectively. The Company received approximately
$208,000, $2,108,000 and $2,102,000 in federal income tax refunds during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
connection with the adoption of the stockholder rights plan. There are no shares of Series A Preferred Stock currently outstanding.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had approximately $12,013,000 of state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future
The holders of Series A Preferred Stock will have voting rights, be entitled to receive dividends based on a defined formula and
state taxable income. Such carryforwards reflect income tax losses incurred which will expire on December 31 of the following years:
have certain rights in the event of the Company’s dissolution. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall not be redeemable.
However, the Company may purchase shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the open market or pursuant to an offer to a holder or
holders.
Cumulative losses recorded in other comprehensive income for adjustments in the minimum pension liability, net of tax, totaled
$2,350,000, $1,477,000 and $353,000 at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Cumulative amounts recorded in other
comprehensive income for the aggregate fair market value of all swap agreements, net of tax, totaled $349,000 and $419,000 at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
2009
2010
2011
2017
(in thousands)
$
4,990
560
5,999
464
$ 12,013
The following is a reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) to that computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 34% to
income before income taxes:
Years ended December 31,
Federal tax at the statutory rate
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax asset
Research and development tax credit
Other
$
2002
5,567
646
(677)
(330)
(272)
$
2001
3,154
238
(300)
(338)
156
(in thousands)
$
2000
607
153
(3,008)
(262)
1,112
$
4,934
$
2,910
$
(1,398)
48 SYPR
SYPR 49
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
Note 16. Segment Information
December 31,
Deferred tax assets:
Compensation and benefit accruals
Inventory valuation
State net operating loss carryforwards
Contract provisions
Accounts receivable allowance
Defined benefit pension plan
Interest rate swap agreements
Other
Valuation allowance
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Defined benefit pension plan
(in thousands)
2002
2001
$
1,190
1,042
689
572
199
—
210
103
4,005
—
4,005
(4,115)
(258)
(4,373)
$
1,287
728
977
517
290
1,451
309
303
5,862
(677)
5,185
(2,354)
—
(2,354)
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
$
(368)
$
2,831
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets decreased by $677,000, $300,000 and $3,008,000 in 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s future earnings will be sufficient to ensure the
realization of deferred tax assets for federal and state purposes.
Note 15. Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding adjusted to include the potentially dilutive effect of outstanding stock options.
The following table presents information necessary to calculate earnings per common share:
Years ended December 31,
Shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive employee stock options
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions
Net income applicable to common stock
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
(in thousands, except for per share data)
2002
2001
2000
13,117
547
13,664
$ 11,439
$
$
0.87
0.84
9,828
200
10,028
6,367
0.65
0.63
$
$
$
9,671
293
9,964
3,184
0.33
0.32
$
$
$
The Company’s operations are conducted in two reportable business segments: the Electronics Group and the Industrial Group.
The segments are each managed separately because of the distinctions between the products, services, markets, customers,
technologies, and workforce skills of the segments. The Electronics Group provides a wide range of manufacturing and technical
services for a diversified customer base as an outsourced service provider. The Electronics Group also manufactures complex
data storage systems, magnetic instruments, current sensors, and other electronic products. The Industrial Group provides
manufacturing services for a variety of customers that outsource forged and finished steel components and subassemblies.
The Industrial Group also manufactures high-pressure closures and other fabricated products. Revenue derived from outsourced
services for the Electronics Group accounted for 55%, 67% and 65% of total net revenue in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Revenue derived from outsourced services for the Industrial Group accounted for 29%, 15% and 12% of total net revenue in 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively. There was no intersegment net revenue recognized for all years presented. The following table
presents financial information for the reportable segments of the Company:
Years ended December 31,
Net revenue from unaffiliated customers:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
Gross profit:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
Operating income:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate and other
Total assets:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate and other
Depreciation and amortization:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate and other
Capital expenditures:
Electronics Group
Industrial Group
General, corporate and other
(in thousands)
2002
2001
2000
$ 186,562
86,915
$ 207,282
47,358
$ 182,126
34,445
$ 273,477
$ 254,640
$ 216,571
$ 37,796
11,725
$ 37,385
6,162
$ 36,272
4,041
$ 49,521
$ 43,547
$ 40,313
$ 14,447
8,210
(3,701)
$ 12,903
3,563
(3,436)
$
6,935
1,648
(3,106)
$ 18,956
$ 13,030
$
5,477
$ 114,305
90,781
18,519
$ 121,228
73,820
16,396
$ 124,523
37,851
16,748
$ 223,605
$ 211,444
$ 179,122
$
6,885
4,224
277
$ 11,386
$
7,518
12,009
220
$
$
$
7,951
1,694
211
9,856
7,917
19,547
159
$
$
$
8,037
1,109
205
9,351
7,971
15,546
369
$ 19,747
$ 27,623
$ 23,886
The Company’s export sales from the U.S. totaled $25,437,000, $23,890,000 and $25,250,000 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
50 SYPR
SYPR 51
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Corporate Directory
Note 17. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Board of Directors
Corporate Officers
Subsidiary Officers
The following is an analysis of certain items in the consolidated income statements by quarter for the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001:
2002
2001
(in thousands, except for per share data)
First
Second
Third
Fourth
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$ 62,533
11,129
3,733
1,825
$ 73,509
12,882
4,759
2,805
$ 70,757
13,974
5,658
3,534
$ 66,678
11,536
4,806
3,275
$ 58,035
10,164
2,577
1,019
$ 63,152
10,914
2,912
1,209
$ 65,228
11,063
3,501
1,760
$ 68,225
11,406
4,040
2,379
$
$
$
0.18
0.17
$
$
0.20
0.19
$
$
0.25
0.24
— $
— $
0.03
$
$
$
0.23
0.23
0.03
$
$
$
0.10
0.10
$
$
0.12
0.12
$
$
0.18
0.18
$
$
0.24
0.23
— $
— $
— $
—
Net revenue
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Earnings per
common share:
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends declared
per common share
Common Stock Information
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "SYPR." The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
Year ended December 31, 2001:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Year ended December 31, 2002:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
High
Low
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8.00
8.22
10.55
13.46
16.35
21.35
16.03
12.28
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4.00
3.75
7.50
9.80
12.50
15.30
10.00
9.94
ROBERT E. GILL (1†)
Chairman of the Board
ROBERT E. GILL (5)
Chairman of the Board
JEFFREY T. GILL (1)
President & CEO
JEFFREY T. GILL (5)
President & CEO
DAVID D. JOHNSON (5)
Vice President, CFO
& Treasurer
RICHARD L. DAVIS (5)
Senior Vice President
& Secretary
ANTHONY C. ALLEN (5)
Vice President of Finance
and Information Systems
& Assistant Secretary
HENRY F. FRIGON (1,2†, 4)
Private Investor & Consultant
R. SCOTT GILL (1)
Managing Broker
Koenig & Strey
GMAC Real Estate
WILLIAM L. HEALEY (4†)
President & CEO
Cal Quality Electronics, Inc.
ROGER W. JOHNSON (3†, 4)
Private Investor, Educator
& Consultant
SIDNEY R. PETERSEN (2, 3)
Retired Chairman & CEO
Getty Oil, Inc.
ROBERT SROKA (2, 3)
Managing Partner
Lighthouse Partners, LLC
As of February 24, 2003 there were 816 holders of record of our common stock.
On September 22, 2002, our Board of Directors declared an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 (three cents) per common share
outstanding. Cash dividends declared in 2002 totaled $0.06 (six cents) per common share outstanding. Dividends may be paid on
common stock only when, as, and if declared by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion.
(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Compensation Committee
(3) Member of Audit and Finance Committee
(4) Member of Nominating and Governance Committee
(5) Executive Officer
† Committee Chairman
CYNTHIA Y. BELAK
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.
JAMES G. COCKE (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Electronics, LLC
STUART W. JONES
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.
JOHN M. KRAMER (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Technologies, Inc.
ROBERT G. MARRAH
Vice President of Business
Development
Sypris Electronics, LLC
DAVID L. MONACO
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Electronics, LLC
G. DARRELL ROBERTSON (5)
Vice President; President & CEO
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.
EDMUND R. STUCZYNSKI
Vice President of Operations
Sypris Electronics, LLC
NORMAN E. ZELESKY
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Technologies, Inc.
52 SYPR
SYPR 53
Company Locations
INVESTOR INFORMATION
SOUTH CAROLINA
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Square D
8821 Garners Ferry Road
Hopkins, SC 29061
Phone: (803) 695-7874
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Bose Facility
2000 Carolina Pines Drive
Blythewood, SC 29016
Phone: (803) 714-8397
TENNESSEE
Sypris Test & Measurement
305 Seaboard Lane
Suite 318
Franklin, TN 37067
Phone: (615) 771-2421
TEXAS
Sypris Test & Measurement
258 East Arapaho
Suite 150
Richardson, TX 75081
Phone: (972) 231-4443
Sypris Data Systems
8500 Dyer Street
Suite 65
El Paso, TX 79904
Phone: (915) 757-2547
Sypris Technologies
9801 Westheimer Drive
Suite 302
Houston, TX 77042
Phone: (713) 917-6878
ALABAMA
Sypris Data Systems
3322 S. Memorial Parkway
Suite 505
Huntsville, AL 35801
Phone: (256) 881-2231
ARIZONA
Sypris Test & Measurement
2320 West Peoria Avenue
Building D-133
Phoenix, AZ 85029
Phone: (602) 395-5900
CALIFORNIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
2102 Ringwood Avenue
San Jose, CA 95131
Phone: (408) 954-8050
Sypris Test & Measurement
16340 Roscoe Boulevard
Suite 100
Van Nuys, CA 91406
Phone: (818) 830-9111
Sypris Data Systems
Subsidiary Headquarters
605 East Huntington Drive
Monrovia, CA 91016
Phone: (626) 358-9500
COLORADO
Sypris Data Systems
7307 S. Revere Parkway
Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303) 773-4700
Sypris Test & Measurement
8020 Southpark Circle
Suite 300
Littleton, CO 80120
Phone: (303) 773-4616
FLORIDA
Sypris Test & Measurement
Subsidiary Headquarters
6120 Hanging Moss Road
Orlando, FL 32807
Phone: (407) 678-6900
Sypris Electronics
Subsidiary Headquarters
10901 North McKinley Drive
Tampa, FL 33612
Phone: (813) 972-6000
Sypris Data Systems
2460 N. Courtney Parkway
Suite 107
Merritt Island, FL 32953
Phone: (321) 449-9243
MASSACHUSETTS
Sypris Test & Measurement
53 Second Avenue
Burlington, MA 01803
Phone: (781) 272-9050
Sypris Data Systems
8 Eighth Street
Shalimar, FL 32579
Phone: (850) 651-5158
Sypris Test & Measurement
257 Simarano Drive
Marlborough, MA 01752
Phone: (508) 786-9633
MICHIGAN
Sypris Test & Measurement
24301 Catherine Industrial Road
Suite 116
Novi, MI 48375
Phone: (248) 305-5200
NEW JERSEY
Sypris Test & Measurement
650 Liberty Avenue
Union, NJ 07083
Phone: (908) 688-9779
Sypris Test & Measurement
1133 Route 23 South
Wayne, NJ 07470
Phone: (973) 628-1363
NEW YORK
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Delphi Harrison
200 Upper Mountain Road
Building 6
Lockport, NY 14094
Phone: (716) 438-4584
OHIO
Sypris Technologies
1550 Marion Agosta Road
Marion, OH 43302
Phone: (740) 383-2111
Sypris Test & Measurement
925 Keynote Circle
Brooklyn Heights, OH 44131
Phone: (216) 741-7040
Sypris Test & Measurement
3148 Presidential Drive
Fairborn, OH 45234
Phone: (937) 427-3444
GEORGIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
1000 Cobb Place Boulevard
Building 200
Suite 240
Kennesaw, GA 30144
Phone: (770) 795-8092
ILLINOIS
Sypris Test & Measurement
2055 Army Trail Road
Suite 108
Addison, IL 60101
Phone: (630) 620-5800
KENTUCKY
Sypris Solutions, Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
Louisville, KY 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000
Sypris Technologies
Subsidiary Headquarters
2820 West Broadway
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011
Sypris Technologies
Tube Turns Division
2612 Howard Street
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011
MARYLAND
Sypris Test & Measurement
9020 Junction Drive
Suite 3
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
Phone: (301) 483-9753
Sypris Data Systems
9020 Junction Drive
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
Phone: (301) 470-0110
54 SYPR
CORPORATE ADDRESS
Sypris Solutions, Inc.
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
Louisville, KY 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000
Fax: (502) 329-2050
ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will
be held on Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at
10:00 a.m. at 101 Bullitt Lane, Lower
Level Seminar Room, Louisville, Kentucky.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
To learn more about Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
visit our site on the World Wide Web at
www.sypris.com.
INVESTOR MATERIALS
The Sypris Web page – www.sypris.com
– is your entry point for a vast array of
information about Sypris, including its
products, financial information,
real-time stock quotes, links to each
of its subsidiary operations, corporate
governance information and other
useful information.
For investor information, including
additional annual reports, 10-Ks, 10-Qs
or any other financial literature, please
contact Carroll A. Dunavent, Director of
Legal and Corporate Services, 101 Bullitt
Lane, Suite 450, Louisville, KY 40222.
SYPRIS ON NASDAQ
The common stock of Sypris trades
on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol SYPR.
TRANSFER AGENT
LaSalle Bank N.A.
135 South LaSalle Street
Suite 1811
Chicago, IL 60603
Phone: (800) 246-5761
Fax: (312) 904-2236
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
400 West Market Street
Suite 2100
Louisville, KY 40202
Phone: (502) 585-1400
Fax: (502) 584-4221
CORPORATE COUNSEL
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP
2800 PNC Plaza
Louisville, KY 40202
Phone: (502) 589-5235
Fax: (502) 589-0309
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report may contain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These projections and statements reflect our
current views with respect to future events and financial performance. No assurance can be given,
however, that these events will occur or that these projections will be achieved and actual results
could differ materially from those projected as a result of certain factors. These factors include our
dependence on our current management; the risks and uncertainties present in our business, including
changes in laws or regulations; business conditions and growth in the general economy and the
electronics and industrial markets served by us; competitive factors and price pressures; availability
of third party component parts at reasonable prices; inventory risks due to shifts in market demand
and/or price erosion of purchased components; changes in product mix; cost and yield issues
associated with our manufacturing facilities; the ability to successfully manage growth; the effects
(including possible increases in the cost of doing business) resulting from future war and terrorists
activities or political uncertainties; as well as other factors included in our periodic reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.