Sypris Solutions, Inc. Annual Report 2005

← All annual reports

FY2005 Annual Report · Sypris Solutions, Inc.

Loading PDF…

Driving Change

2005 Annual Report

What drives change?

Is it an unrelenting focus on continuous improvement?

Fernando Garcia, Manuel Hurtado, Joe Ferguson, Frank Fritton

Or a dedication

to efﬁ ciency through engineering excellence?

Brenda Marcotte, Hoa (Mike) Pham

Terence Porter, Keith Thal

Or the empowerment of experienced managers

to lead our operations into the future?

Mike Shows, Jorge Rojas, Brett Keener

Or embracing safety

as an important keystone of our business?

John Rhyne, Kelly Hurley

Or driving the supply chain

to achieve critical cost synergies?

Wayne Stoia, Rich Warren

Michele McGoun

Or implementing systems

that provide real-time management tools?

Stewart Molica, Jon Shellhaas, Jeff Reibel, Cynthia Belak

Or the development of talented people

Yes, it’s all of these and more.

to carry us to the next level?

Jim Kerr

Sypris Solutions 13

Robert E. Gill
Chairman of the Board

Jeffrey T. Gill
President & CEO

DEAR FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS:

The year 2005 represented another signiﬁcant
milestone in terms of the growth and
development of Sypris, with new records
established for orders, revenue, cash ﬂow and
revenue per U.S. employee, among others.

The Company beneﬁted during the year from
an infusion of new talent with proven track
records of accomplishment from a number
of blue chip companies, including Alcoa,
ArvinMeritor, Cooper Industries, Delphi,
DuPont, Floserve, General Motors, Honeywell
and Johnson Controls. We believe that
these people will prove to be instrumental in
shaping the future of Sypris.

We also completed the start-up of eight new
programs and the installation of a variety of
new manufacturing cells. These programs and
advanced production capabilities are expected
to have a meaningful impact on the Company’s
top line and productivity for years to come.

Unfortunately, despite these important
successes, the Company’s performance during
the year did not meet expectations for net
income or earnings per share. We will continue
to address these shortcomings with the
appropriate sense of urgency and allocation of

resources. Our objective remains unchanged:
to consistently deliver results that exceed
expectations.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Revenue increased for the sixth consecutive
year, rising 23% to a record $523 million from
$425 million in 2004. The increase was driven
by a 38% increase in revenue for our Industrial
Group, which beneﬁted from the full-year
impact of supply agreements with Dana and
ArvinMeritor that were awarded during 2004,
and a 20% increase in the production of
commercial vehicles during 2005.

Net income declined 36% to $5.3 million
from the prior year as a result of cost
overruns incurred to increase manufacturing
capacity, higher than expected expenses
for the launch of the eight new programs
and the impact of signiﬁcant manufacturing
inefﬁciencies as the Company struggled to
respond to escalating customer demand.

5
2
5
$

6
7
4
$

2
2
3
6 $
6
2
$

2
4
2
$

3
2
5
$

5
2
4
$

4
7
2
$

7
7
2
$

5
5
2
$

4
8
.
0
$

3
6
.
0
$

6
5
.
0
$

7
4
.
0
$

9
2
.
0
$

Earnings per share declined 38% to $0.29 as a
result of the decline in net income and a 3%
increase in the number of fully diluted shares
outstanding.

Company’s future free cash ﬂow is expected
to reﬂect the beneﬁt of these lower levels of
capital investment.

Cash ﬂow from operations reached a new
record during 2005, increasing 365% to $73
million for the year. The increase was fueled
by a 23% reduction in working capital and
represented an important accomplishment
for the Company, especially since the
improvement was achieved during a period of
rapid revenue growth.

And ﬁnally, the ratio of revenue generated
from each U.S. employee increased for the
sixth consecutive year, rising 8% to a record
$206,000 per person from $190,000 for
the prior year period. We believe that the
continuation of this trend is an important
indication of the Company’s ongoing progress.

INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE
The year was meaningful in terms of the
investments we made in the Company’s
future. A total of $36 million was invested
to add manufacturing capacity, reduce cycle
times, improve quality and reduce costs.
Combined with expenditures made during the
prior two years, the Company’s total three-
year investment now exceeds $165 million.

As a result, we believe that Sypris is now
positioned to handle a wide variety of
future market requirements with minimal
investments in additional capacity. The

DRIVING CHANGE
The theme for this year’s annual report
reﬂects our commitment to driving change
throughout our business. Key initiatives are
under way in the areas of continuous
improvement, engineering, operations,
supply chain management, ﬁnance and
human resources. These initiatives are
expected to accelerate the development of
Sypris into a stronger, more effective
enterprise. Please join us for a brief review
of the people and their efforts to drive
change throughout Sypris.

An Unrelenting Focus on Continuous
Improvement
We are implementing LEAN and Six Sigma on
an increasing scale throughout our business
with the help of experienced professionals
such as Fernando, Manuel, Joe and Frank.
The Company’s future success will rest upon
our ability to reduce cycle times and waste,
improve productivity and increase the output
of our operations.

One of the key areas of focus is on our
system for maintenance. We believe that
we can make substantial improvements to
the throughput of our factories by rigorously
adhering to this LEAN-based model. When fully
implemented, the results should be immediate
and lasting.

3
7
$

6
0
2
$

5
8
1
$

0
9
1
$

7
7
1
$

4
5
1
$

4
1
$

8
$

7
2
$

)
7
2
(
$

6
5
$

6
3
$

8
2
$

3
2
$

0
2
$

01 02 03 04 05

Capital Expenditures
(in millions)

01 02 03 04 05

Orders
(in millions)

Revenue
(in millions)

Earnings per Share

Cash Flow from Operations
(in millions)

Revenue per Employee
(USA) (in thousands)

14 Sypris Solutions

Sypris Solutions 15

A Dedication to Efﬁciency Through
Engineering
Sypris employs over 150 engineers, who
represent roughly 30% of the Company’s salaried
workforce. Brenda, Mike, Terence and Keith have
been essential to many of our efforts to craft
solutions for our customers through engineering
excellence.

The development of software certainly plays an
important role in these efforts. At Sypris, we
have a vast array of software design capabilities,
ranging from the creation of test programs to the
development of sophisticated encryption code for
use in secure communications.

The Empowerment of Experienced
Managers to Lead our Operations
into the Future
Mike, Jorge and Brett are representative of the
highly skilled breed of professionals who are
leading the operations of Sypris into the future.
Each of these gentlemen is responsible for an
important segment of the Company’s operations
and the development of its performance-driven
culture.

The Sypris Production System is an excellent
example of the efforts that are underway to
improve and systematize the Company’s pursuit
of manufacturing excellence. The system is
derived from LEAN principles and is expected
to have a material impact on the efﬁciency and
effectiveness of the Company’s manufacturing
operations.

Embracing Safety as an Important
Keystone of our Business
During periods of rapid growth, it is extremely
important to reinforce rigorous programs of safety.
New employees are joining the ﬁrm, while the
existing workforce is highly focused on meeting
the increasing requirements of customers. In
situations such as these, training and preventive
programs can get lost in the shufﬂe.

John and Kelly are part of a team that is
empowered to make certain that we protect our
employees from unnecessary exposure to potential
injury. We will dedicate whatever resources are
necessary to support these efforts. Safety is an
important keystone to the future of our people
and our business.

Driving the Supply Chain to Achieve
Critical Cost Synergies
The cost pressures in today’s economic
environment are unrelenting, with an increasing
array of products and services available from
low-cost regions around the globe. In order to be
successful under these circumstances, it is vitally
important to have a well-developed supply chain
strategy.

Wayne, Rich and Michele are leading our efforts
to consolidate the vendor base and drive critical
cost synergies across an increasingly large
procurement requirement. For example, direct
and indirect material purchases exceeded $275
million during 2005. Against this backdrop, even a
small percentage savings can translate into a high
dollar impact.

Implementing Systems that Provide
Real-Time Management Tools
Integrated systems of ﬁnancial control and
reporting provide the essential nervous system
that is required for the effective management of
any fast-growing enterprise. Stewart, Jon, Jeff
and Cynthia are key members of our ﬁnancial
organization and are responsible for many of the
new initiatives currently under way.

One such project is the development of a
comprehensive dashboard that will soon be
available to managers throughout the Company
on their individual computers. The dashboard will
provide real-time information for vital ﬁnancial
and operational information, including shipments,
proﬁt, inventory, on-time delivery and quality,
among others.

The Development of Talented People
to Carry Us to the Next Level
The development and retention of talented
people represents the lifeblood of our
organization. We must continue to provide a
challenging environment where men and women
from all walks of life can realize their career
ambitions.

Jim is working with others in our Human
Resources organization to insure that Sypris has
a well-developed, multi-dimensional career
path model that will support the growing needs
of the Company and its people.

Driving Change for Future Success
The future success of Sypris is dependent upon
our ability to drive change throughout the

organization. We must continue to improve our
operational capabilities, the reliability of our
ﬁnancial results and the competitiveness of our
cost structure. The results will not be realized
overnight, but with people and initiatives such as
these, we believe that we will have a very good
chance of success.

THANK YOU
We want to thank our employees, many of whom
are fellow stockholders, for their hard work and
support. The continued advancement of Sypris
would not have been possible without their
commitment and dedication to building Sypris
into an increasingly successful company.

We also want to thank our customers for the
opportunity to serve them. We are dedicated
to providing each of these business partners
with the right solutions to improve their
competitiveness.

We sincerely appreciate your investment in Sypris
Solutions and encourage you to contact us. We
welcome your comments and would be pleased
to answer your questions.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey T. Gill
President & CEO

Robert E. Gill
Chairman of the Board

Total Productive Maintenance System

Sypris Production System

Material Costs

Career Progression Sequence

Total Productive Maintenance

Autonomous

Root Cause

Predictive

Preventive

Emergency

Planned

Employee
Involvement

Suppliers

Process Flow

Zero Errors

Process
Effectiveness

Customers

Lean Support
Systems

Fab 8%

Cores 9%

CCAs 12%

Electronics 30%

Promotional
Opportunities

OEM 16%

Supplies 25%

Initial Role

Group
VP

Leadership
Crossfunctional

Functional VP
Plant Manager

Operations Manager
Engineering Supervisor
Quality Supervisor

Production Supervisor
Manufacturing Engineer
Quality Coordinator

Training/
Development

Leadership
Finance

Supervisory
Employee Motivation
Conflict Management

16 Sypris Solutions

Sypris Solutions 17

Sypris Solutions is a diversified provider of technology-based outsourced services and
specialty products. We perform a wide range of manufacturing and technical services,
typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with corporations and government
agencies in the markets for aerospace & defense electronics, truck components &
assemblies, and test & measurement services.

SYPRIS AT A GLANCE

PERFORMANCE 2005

Revenue Increased to a New Record: Up 23%
Driven by increased shipments and full-year results from
new contracts in our Industrial Group, revenue increased
for the sixth consecutive year.

INDUSTRIAL

Earnings per Share Declined: Down 38%
EPS were impacted by a decline in gross proﬁt and a
185% increase in interest expense, as rates increased
on borrowings incurred to support the Company’s
investment program.

Cash Flow from Operations Soared: Up 365%
A 36% increase in depreciation combined with a 23%
decrease in working capital to generate a record $73
million of cash ﬂow from operations.

Capital Expenditures Declined: Down 35%
The Company’s three-year program to invest $165
million in state-of-the-art capabilities and facilities
drew to a close, with future requirements expected
to be in the much lower range of 4% to 5% of annual
revenue.

Free Cash Flow Jumped as a Result: Up 132%
Free cash ﬂow increased by $150 million from the
prior year, resulting in $36 million of free cash ﬂow
for the year.

Net Debt Declined: Down 34%
Net borrowings under the Company’s revolving
credit facility declined 34% by year-end, driven by
the increase in free cash ﬂow.

Orders Posted New Records: Up 10%
Firm orders with speciﬁed shipment dates increased
10% to $525 million for the year as a result of a
20% increase in the production of commercial vehicles
and the commencement of new programs.

Backlog Remained Healthy: Up 1%
Despite the 23% increase in revenue, backlog remained
at a healthy $252 million, driven by the robust demand
for commercial vehicles.

Revenue per US Employee Continued to Rise: Up 8%
This important measure of productivity increased for the
sixth consecutive year to $206,000 per employee.

ELECTRONICS

S
E
I
L
B
M
E
S
S
A
&
S
T
N
E
N
O
P
M
O
C
K
C
U
R
T

S
C
N
O
R
T
C
E
L
E

E
S
N
E
F
E
D
&
E
C
A
P
S
O
R
E
A

S
E
C
V
R
E
S
T
N
E
M
E
R
U
S
A
E
M
&
T
S
E
T

Market-Focused Businesses

Business Summary

Applications and Uses

Select Customers

Manufacturing Services

Automated forging, machining, induction
hardening, cold extrusion, heat-treating,
testing and fabrication of products, production
tooling and prototypes.

ArvinMeritor, Axle Alliance, Cardanes,
Dana, John Deere, Mack Truck, Pratt &
Whitney and Visteon.

Axle shafts, steer axles, trailer axle
beams, carriers, full-float tubes, ring
gears, pinions, knuckles, input shafts,
helical gears, housings and other drive
train components for use in light,
medium and heavy-duty trucks, SUVs,
pickup trucks and automobiles. Jet
engine shafts and construction vehicle
components.

Products

High-pressure closures, transition joints and
insulated joints.

Pipeline and chemical systems in the
energy and chemical industries.

Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell Oil.

Manufacturing Services

Integrated design and engineering services,
component selection, sourcing and
procurement, automated assembly, design and
implementation of product testing, systems
assembly, and repair and warranty services.

Electronic assemblies and subsystems for
use in military cockpit control and
display systems, missile guidance
systems, commercial avionics, satellite
communications systems, ruggedized
hand-held computers, and secure
communications networks and products.

BAE Systems, Boeing, General Dynamics,
Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, National
Security Agency, Northrop Grumman,
Raytheon, U.S. Army and ViaSat.

Engineering Services

Software design services for data and
communications security products and
contract design services.

Secured transmission of voice and
data for intelligence and surveillance
applications.

General Services Administration, National
Security Agency and U.S. Army.

Products

Encryption devices and real-time network-
centric analog and digital data acquisition and
storage systems.

Network and communications security,
collection and storage of data for
aerospace applications, weapons test
and evaluation, and acquisition of signal
data from targets of interest for the
intelligence gathering community.

General Dynamics, Government of Israel,
Johnson Space Center, Lockheed Martin,
NASA, National Security Agency, Northrop
Grumman, Raytheon, Titan Corporation,
TRW, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army and
U.S. Navy.

Calibration and Repair

Calibration, repair and certiﬁcation of
electrical, electronic, physical and
dimensional test equipment. Installation,
execution and turn-key management of
customer “Permanent On-Site” Calibration
Programs.

Telecommunications systems, air traffic
control systems, electronic component
manufacturing, automotive, process
control, weather radar systems,
aerospace and defense, medical device
manufacturing and power generation
and distribution.

Testing

Testing of digital, linear, discrete, passive
and hybrid components, RF device testing,
EMI testing, environmental testing, dynamics
testing, NEMA Trafﬁc Systems testing
and transportation testing on packaging,
products, systems and subassemblies.

Military, aerospace, satellite and
launch systems, missile systems,
avionics, medical, telecommunications
semiconductor manufacturing,
automotive and transportation.

Products

Hall generators, current sensors, autoprobes
and gaussmeters.

Current measurement applications
in mass transit systems, elevators,
automotive diagnostic systems and
laboratory diagnostic systems.
Magnetic measurement of components
used in military, aerospace and medical
applications, and for research and
development and quality control.

AT&T, Bombardier, Bose, Delphi
Automotive, Eaton, FAA, Hamilton
Sundstrand, Honeywell, ITT, Lucent
Technologies, Maxtor, Motorola, National
Weather Service, Nokia, Siemens,
Square D, Terumo Cardiovascular,
Texas Instruments, Tyco Electronics,
TRW Automotive, and Underwriters
Laboratories.

Arrow-Zeus, Avnet, BAE Systems,
Bose, Eldec, General Dynamics, GE
Infrastructure Security, Goodrich,
Hamilton Sundstrand, Harris, Honeywell,
iRobot, Jabil Circuit, L-3, Lockheed
Martin, Merrimac Industries, Northrop
Grumman, Raytheon, Reckitt Benckiser,
Sawtek and Teledyne.

Electro-Motive Diesel, Hamilton
Sundstrand, Ithaco, Lockheed Martin,
Miltope, Science and Engineering
Services, and Toyo.

18 Sypris Solutions

Sypris Solutions 19

Corporate Officers from left:
Kathy Smith Boyd, John M. Kramer, Robert B. Sanders,
John R. McGeeney, G. Darrell Robertson, T. Scott Hatton,
Anthony C. Allen, Richard L. Davis

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

ROBERT E. GILL
Chairman of the Board

JEFFREY T. GILL
President & CEO

R. SCOTT GILL
Managing Member
Astor & Longwood, LLC

JOHN F. BRINKLEY
Retired General Manager
North American
Automotive Operations
Export Sales
Ford Motor Company

WILLIAM G. FERKO
Vice President & CFO
Genlyte Group, Inc.

HENRY F. FRIGON
Private Investor
& Consultant

Board of Directors

Corporate Officers

Subsidiary Officers

ROBERT E. GILL (1†)
Chairman of the Board

ROBERT E. GILL (5)
Chairman of the Board

JEFFREY T. GILL (1)
President & CEO

JEFFREY T. GILL (5)
President & CEO

R. SCOTT GILL (1)
Managing Member
Astor & Longwood, LLC

JOHN F. BRINKLEY (2, 4)
Retired General Manager
North American Automotive
Operations Export Sales
Ford Motor Company

WILLIAM G. FERKO (3, 4†)
Vice President & CFO
Genlyte Group, Inc.

HENRY F. FRIGON (1, 2†, 4)
Private Investor & Consultant

WILLIAM L. HEALEY
Private Investor & Consultant

SIDNEY R. PETERSEN (2, 3†)
Retired Chairman & CEO
Getty Oil, Inc.

ROBERT SROKA (2, 3)
Managing Director
Corporate Solutions Group

T. SCOTT HATTON (5)
Vice President & CFO

RICHARD L. DAVIS (5)
Senior Vice President

JOHN M. KRAMER (5)
Group Vice President

ROBERT B. SANDERS (5)
Group Vice President

JOHN R. MCGEENEY (5)
General Counsel
& Secretary

ANTHONY C. ALLEN (5)
Vice President & Treasurer

KATHY SMITH BOYD (5)
Vice President

G. DARRELL ROBERTSON (5)
Vice President

(1) Member of Executive Committee

(2) Member of Compensation Committee

(3) Member of Audit and Finance Committee

(4) Member of Nominating and Governance Committee

(5) Executive Officer

† Committee Chairman

CYNTHIA Y. BELAK
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.

LAWRENCE J. BERNICKY
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.

KATHY SMITH BOYD (5)
President
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc.

MARK N. CAIN
Vice President of Human Resources
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

JOHN M. KRAMER (5)
President
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

DAVID L. MONACO
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Electronics, LLC

G. DARRELL ROBERTSON (5)
President
Sypris Data Systems, Inc.

ROBERT B. SANDERS (5)
President
Sypris Electronics, LLC

JON Q. SHELLHAAS
Vice President of Finance
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

NORMAN E. ZELESKY
Vice President
Sypris Technologies, Inc.

WILLIAM L. HEALEY
Private Investor
& Consultant

SIDNEY R. PETERSEN
Retired Chairman & CEO
Getty Oil, Inc.

ROBERT SROKA
Managing Director
Corporate Solutions Group

22 Sypris Solutions

Sypris Solutions 23

COMPANY LOCATIONS

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

ALABAMA
Sypris Data Systems
3322 S. Memorial Parkway
Suite 505
Huntsville, AL 35801
Phone: (256) 881-2231

ARIZONA
Sypris Test & Measurement
2320 West Peoria Avenue
Building D-133
Phoenix, AZ 85029
Phone: (602) 395-5900

CALIFORNIA
Sypris Data Systems
Subsidiary Headquarters
160 E. Via Verde
San Dimas, CA 91773
Phone: (909) 962-9400

Sypris Test & Measurement
16340 Roscoe Boulevard
Suite 100
Van Nuys, CA 91406
Phone: (818) 830-9111

Sypris Test & Measurement
615 N. Mary Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Phone: (408) 720-0006

COLORADO
Sypris Data Systems
7307 S. Revere Parkway
Centennial, CO 80112
Phone: (303) 773-4700

Sypris Test & Measurement
8020 Southpark Circle
Suite 300
Littleton, CO 80120
Phone: (303) 798-2243

FLORIDA
Sypris Test & Measurement
Subsidiary Headquarters
6120 Hanging Moss Road
Orlando, FL 32807
Phone: (407) 678-6900

Sypris Electronics
Subsidiary Headquarters
10901 North McKinley Drive
Tampa, FL 33612
Phone: (813) 972-6000

Sypris Data Systems
2460 N. Courtney Parkway
Suite 107
Merritt Island, FL 32953
Phone: (321) 449-9243

GEORGIA
Sypris Test & Measurement
1000 Cobb Place Boulevard
Building 200, Suite 240
Kennesaw, GA 30144
Phone: (770) 795-8092

ILLINOIS
Sypris Test & Measurement
2055 Army Trail Road
Suite 108
Addison, IL 60101
Phone: (630) 620-5800

KENTUCKY
Sypris Solutions, Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
Louisville, KY 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000

Sypris Technologies
Subsidiary Headquarters
2820 West Broadway
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011

Sypris Technologies
Tube Turns Division
2612 Howard Street
Louisville, KY 40211
Phone: (502) 774-6011

MARYLAND
Sypris Data Systems
9020 Junction Drive
Suite 3
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
Phone: (301) 470-0110

Sypris Electronics
9020 Junction Drive
Suite 3
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
Phone: (301) 490-4397

MASSACHUSETTS
Sypris Test & Measurement
53 Second Avenue
Burlington, MA 01803
Phone: (781) 272-9050

Sypris Test & Measurement
257 Simarano Drive
Marlborough, MA 01752
Phone: (508) 786-9633

Sypris Test & Measurement
7 Sterling Road
North Billerica, MA 01862
Phone: (978) 667-7000

MICHIGAN
Sypris Test & Measurement
24301 Catherine Industrial Road
Suite 116
Novi, MI 48375
Phone: (248) 305-5200

NEW JERSEY
Sypris Test & Measurement
2500 Main Street
Suite 2
Sayreville, NJ 08872
Phone: (732) 721-6116

Sypris Test & Measurement
1133 Route 23 South
Wayne, NJ 07470
Phone: (973) 628-1363

NEW YORK
Sypris Test & Measurement
135 Calkins Road
Rochester, NY 14623
Phone: (716) 438-4584

Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Delphi Harrison
200 Upper Mountain Road
Building 6
Lockport, NY 14094
Phone: (803) 714-8397

NORTH CAROLINA
Sypris Technologies
105 Wamsutta Mill Road
Morganton, NC 28655
Phone: (828) 433-4600

OHIO
Sypris Technologies
13267 State Route 68 South
Kenton, OH 43326
Phone: (419) 674-4051

Sypris Technologies
1550 Marion Agosta Road
Marion, OH 43302
Phone: (740) 383-2111

Sypris Test & Measurement
950 Keynote Circle
Brooklyn Heights, OH 44131
Phone: (216) 741-7040

Sypris Test & Measurement
3148 Presidential Drive
Fairborn, OH 45324
Phone: (937) 427-3444

SOUTH CAROLINA
Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Square D
8821 Garners Ferry Road
Hopkins, SC 29061
Phone: (803) 695-7874

Sypris Test & Measurement
c/o Bose Facility
2000 Carolina Pines Drive
Blythewood, SC 29016
Phone: (803) 714-8397

TEXAS
Sypris Test & Measurement
258 East Arapaho
Suite 150
Richardson, TX 75081
Phone: (972) 231-4443

Sypris Data Systems
8500 Dyer Street
Suite 65
El Paso, TX 79904
Phone: (915) 757-2547

MEXICO
Sypris Technologies
Alberto Einstein No. 401
Zona Industrial
Toluca, Mexico C.P. 50071
Phone: (52) (722) 279-3906

(In thousands, except per share data)

Consolidated Income Statement Data:

Net revenue

Gross profit

Operating income

Net income

Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted

Cash dividends declared
per common share

(In thousands)

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Years ended December 31,

2005

2004(1) (2)(3)
Restated

2003(1)
Restated

2002(1)
Restated

2 0 0 1 ( 1 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 )
Restated

$ 522,766 $ 425,402 $ 276,605 $ 273,477 $ 254,640

51,338

53,439

45,945

49,541

43,475

12,222

13,898

14,874

18,976

12,958

5,321

8,299

8,091

11,453

6,318

$
$

0.30 $
0.29 $

0.48 $
0.47 $

0.57 $
0.56 $

0.87 $
0.84 $

0.64
0.63

0.12 $

0.06 $

—

December 31,

2005

2004(1)(2)(3)
Restated

2003(1)(3)
Restated

2002(1)
Restated

2 0 0 1 ( 1 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 )
Restated

Working capital

Total assets

$ 111,765 $ 143,123 $ 81,456 $ 78,600 $ 68,312

417,624

431,178

264,435

224,612

212,431

Long-term debt, net of current portion

80,000

110,000

53,000

30,000

80,000

Total stockholders’ equity

213,734

208,939

145,392

137,690

70,761

(1) On January 1, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for inventory and cost of sales at one manufacturing
facility. Prior year amounts have been restated as required for comparability. The change increased previously
reported earnings for the year ended 2004 by $892, or $0.05 per diluted share. The change (decreased) increased
previously reported earnings for 2003, 2002 and 2001 by $(44), $13 and $(49), respectively which did not change per
diluted share amounts.

(2) On May 3, 2004 and June 30, 2004, respectively, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of ArvinMeritor’s

Kenton, Ohio facility and Dana’s Toluca, Mexico facility and their results of operations and related purchased assets
are included from those dates forward.

(3) On December 31, 2003, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of Dana’s Morganton, North Carolina facility

and its results of operations and related purchased assets are included from that date forward.

(4) On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible

Assets,” which required us to discontinue the amortization of goodwill. Amortization of goodwill decreased earnings
per diluted share by $0.08 in the year ended December 31, 2001.

(5) On May 31, 2001, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of Dana’s Marion, Ohio facility and its results of

operations and related purchased assets are included from that date forward.

24 Sypris Solutions

Sypris Solutions 25

FORM 10-K ▲

26 Sypris Solutions

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)
(cid:0)(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:1)

Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005.

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For the
transition period from ________ to ________.

Commission file number 0-24020

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

101 Bullitt Lane, Suite 450
Louisville, Kentucky 40222
(Address of principal executive
offices, including zip code)

61-1321992
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

(502) 329-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
(cid:2)

(cid:0)

Yes

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
(cid:2)

(cid:0)

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

(cid:0)

(cid:2)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

(cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

(cid:2)

Large accelerated filer

(cid:0)

Accelerated filer

(cid:2)

Non-accelerated filer

(cid:2)

(cid:0)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the
price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second
fiscal quarter (June 30, 2005) was $116,861,629.
There were 18,165,658 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2006.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held May 2, 2006 are incorporated by reference into Part III to the extent described therein.

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1.

Business...........................................................................................................................

Item 1A.

Risk Factors .....................................................................................................................

Page

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.............................................................................................. 15

Item 2.

Properties......................................................................................................................... 16

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings ............................................................................................................ 17

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......................................................... 18

Part II

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities .......................................................................... 19

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data..................................................................................................... 20

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations... 21

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ............................................. 34

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ................................................................... 35

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure... 66

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures ................................................................................................... 66

Item 9B.

Other Information............................................................................................................. 66

Part III

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.............................................................. 67

Item 11.

Executive Compensation................................................................................................... 67

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related

Stockholder Matters................................................................................................... 67

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.................................................................. 67

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services ............................................................................. 67

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules....................................................................... 68

Signature Page............................................................................................................................................. 74

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.......................................................................................... 75

In this Form 10-K, “Sypris,” “SYPR,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries and
predecessors, collectively. “Sypris Solutions” and “Sypris” are our trademarks. All other trademarks, servicemarks or
trade names referred to in this Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

We focus on those markets where we have the expertise, qualifications and leadership position to sustain a
competitive advantage. We target our resources to support the needs of industry leaders that embrace multi-year
contractual relationships as a strategic component of their supply chain management. These contracts, many of
which are sole-source by part number and are for terms of up to ten years, enable us to invest in leading-edge
technologies to help our customers remain competitive. The productivity, flexibility and economies of scale that
result become an important means for differentiating ourselves from the competition when it comes to cost, quality,
reliability and customer service.

Truck Components & Assemblies. We are the principal supplier of manufacturing services for the forging
and machining of medium and heavy-duty truck axle shafts and other drive train components in North America. We
produce these axle shafts and components under multi-year, sole-source contracts with ArvinMeritor, Inc.
(ArvinMeritor) and Dana Corporation (Dana), the two primary providers of drive train assemblies for use by the
leading truck manufacturers, including Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), Freightliner LLC (“Freightliner”), Mack
Trucks, Inc. (“Mack”), Navistar International Corporation (“Navistar”), PACCAR, Inc. (“PACCAR”) and Volvo
Truck Corporation (“Volvo”). We supply ArvinMeritor with trailer axle beams for use by the leading trailer
manufacturers, including Dorsey Trailer Company (“Dorsey”), Great Dane Limited Partnership (“Great Dane”),
Hyundai Motor Company (“Hyundai”), Stoughton Trailers, LLC (“Stoughton”), Trailmobile Corporation
(“Trailmobile”), Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company (“Utility”) and Wabash National Corporation (“Wabash”).
We also supply Visteon Corporation (Visteon) with light axle shafts for Ford’s F150, F250, F350 and Ranger series
pickup trucks, Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Mustang GT, and Traxle Manufacturing Inc.
(“Traxle”) with forged axle shafts for the heavy duty truck market. We continue to support our customers’ strategies
to outsource non-core operations by supplying additional components and providing additional value added
operations for drive train assemblies. Our truck components & assemblies business accounted for approximately
66% of net revenue in 2005.

Aerospace & Defense Electronics. We are an established supplier of manufacturing services for the
production of complex circuit cards, high-level assemblies and subsystems. We have long-term relationships with
many of the leading aerospace & defense contractors, including Boeing Company (“Boeing”), General Dynamics
Corporation (“General Dynamics”), Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”), Lockheed Martin Corporation
(“Lockheed”), Northrop Grumman Corporation (“Northrop Grumman”) and Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”). We
manufacture these complex electronic assemblies under multi-year contracts for the missile guidance systems of the
AMRAAM and Brimstone missile programs, and for the main color display systems for the cockpit of the AH-64D
Apache Longbow attack helicopter. We also have a long-term relationship with the National Security Agency to
design and build secure communications equipment and write encryption software. The defense budget for fiscal
2006 contains provisions to increase spending for space, smart weapons, surveillance, intelligence and secure
communications, areas for which we have long provided essential services and products; however, funds were
diverted in 2005 to finance the armed forces and related equipment and expendable supplies for the war in Iraq, and
we expect this to continue throughout 2006. Our aerospace & defense electronics business accounted for
approximately 22% of net revenue in 2005.

Test & Measurement Services. We provide technical services for the calibration, certification and repair
of test & measurement equipment in and outside the United States (U.S.). We have a multi-year contract with the
Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) to calibrate and certify the equipment that is used to maintain the radar
systems and directional beacons at over 500 airports in the U.S., the Caribbean and the South Pacific. We also have
a contract with the National Weather Service to calibrate the equipment that is used to maintain the NEXRAD

Doppler radar systems at over 130 advanced warning weather service radar stations in 45 states, the Caribbean and
Guam. We also have a multi-year contract with AT&T Corporation (“AT&T”) to provide calibration and
certification services at over 200 of its central and field switching locations. We are seeing an increased interest by
large companies, such as Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), in awarding multi-year contracts for calibration
services in order to accelerate vendor reduction programs and reduce costs. Our test and measurement services
business accounted for approximately 8% of net revenue in 2005.

Industry Overview

We believe the trend toward outsourcing is continuing across a wide range of industries and markets as
outsourcing specialists assume a strategic role in the supply chain of companies of all types and sizes. We expect the
growth in outsourcing expenditures to continue increasing at a rate far higher than the expansion in the overall
economy.

We believe the trend toward outsourcing is continuing because outsourcing frequently represents a more
efficient, lower cost means for manufacturing a product or delivering a service when compared to more vertically
integrated alternatives. While the rate of acceptance of the outsourcing model may vary by industry, we believe the
following benefits of outsourcing are driving this general trend.

Reduced Total Operating Costs and Invested Capital. Outsourcing specialists are frequently able to
produce products and/or deliver services at a reduced total cost relative to that of their customers because of the
ability to allocate the expense for a given set of fixed capacity, including assets, people and support systems, across
multiple customers with diversified needs. In turn, these outsourcing specialists can achieve higher utilization of
their resources and achieve greater productivity, flexibility and economies of scale.

Access to Advanced Manufacturing Capabilities and Processes and Increased Productivity. The ability to
use a fixed set of production assets for a number of customers enables outsourcing specialists to invest in the latest
technology as a means to further improve productivity, quality and cycle times. The magnitude of these investments
can be prohibitive absent the volume and reliability of future orders associated with having a broad array of
customers for the use of those assets.

Focus on Core Competencies. Companies are under intense competitive pressure to constantly rationalize
their operations, invest in and strengthen areas in which they can add the greatest value to their customers and divest
or outsource areas in which they add lesser value. By utilizing the services of outsourcing specialists, these
companies can react more quickly to changing market conditions and allocate valuable capital and other resources to
core activities, such as research and development, sales and marketing or product integration.

Improved Supply Chain Management. We believe that the trend in outsourcing favors specialists that
have the financial, managerial and capital resources to assume an increasingly greater role in the management of the
supply chain for the customer. By utilizing fewer and more capable suppliers, companies are able to greatly simplify
the infrastructure required to manage these suppliers, thereby reducing their costs and improving margins.

Our Markets

Truck Components & Assemblies. The truck components & assemblies market consists of the original
equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, including DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford, Freightliner, General Motors
Corporation, Mack, Navistar, PACCAR and Volvo, and a deep and extensive supply chain of companies of all types
and sizes that are classified into different levels or tiers. The trailer market consists of OEMs including Dorsey,
Great Dane, Hyundai, Stoughton, Trailmobile, Utility and Wabash. Tier I companies represent the primary suppliers
to the OEMs and includes ArvinMeritor, Dana, Delphi Automotive Systems Corporation, Eaton Corporation, and
Visteon, among others. Many of the Tier I companies are confronted with excess capacity, high hourly wage rates,
costly benefit packages and aging capital equipment. Below this group of companies reside numerous suppliers that
either supply the OEMs directly or supply the Tier I companies. In all segments of the truck components &
assemblies and the trailer markets, however, suppliers are under intense competitive pressure to improve product
quality and to reduce capital expenditures, production costs and inventory levels.

In an attempt to gain a competitive advantage, many OEMs have been reducing the number of suppliers
they utilize. These manufacturers are choosing stronger relationships with fewer suppliers that are capable of
investing to support their operations. In response to this trend, many suppliers have combined with others to gain the
critical mass required to support these needs. As a result, the number of Tier I suppliers is being reduced, but in
many cases, the aggregate production capacity of these companies has yet to be addressed. We believe that as Tier I
suppliers seek to eliminate excess capacity, they will increasingly choose outsourcing as a means to enhance their
financial performance, and as a result, companies such as Sypris will be presented with new business and acquisition
opportunities.

Aerospace & Defense Electronics. The consolidation of defense contractors over the past decade has
added to the increased demand for outsourcing specialists. The consolidated companies, some of which have
developed highly leveraged balance sheets as a result of mergers and acquisitions, have been motivated to seek new
ways to raise margins, increase profitability and enhance cash flow. Accordingly, outsourcing specialists, including
Sypris, have been successful in building new relationships with companies that previously relied more on internal
resources. We believe this trend will continue, and that our extensive experience, clearances, certifications and
qualifications in the manufacturing of aerospace & defense electronics will serve to differentiate us from many of
the more traditional outsource suppliers. We also believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of additional
outsourcing activity that may flow from the prime contractors that are awarded contracts related to increased defense
appropriations and expenditures as a result of increased focus on national defense and homeland security.

The nature of providing outsourced manufacturing services to the aerospace & defense electronics industry
differs substantially from the traditional commercial outsourced manufacturing services industry. The cost of failure
can be extremely high, the manufacturing requirements are typically complex and products are produced in
relatively small quantities. Companies that provide these manufacturing services are required to maintain and adhere
to a number of strict certifications, security clearances and traceability standards that are comprehensive.

Test & Measurement Services. The widespread adoption of the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) and Quality Standards (QS), among others, has been underway for many years. A critical
component of basic manufacturing discipline and these quality programs is the periodic calibration and certification
of the test & measurement equipment that is used to measure process performance. The investment in this
equipment and the skills required to support the calibration and certification process has historically been performed
offsite by the manufacturers of the equipment, or onsite by internal operations, even though the productive use of the
assets and people is difficult to justify since equipment is often certified on an annual, or in some cases, biennial
basis.

We believe that test & measurement services will be increasingly outsourced to independent specialists
who can use the manpower and equipment across a diversified base of customers, reduce investment requirements
and improve profitability on a national scale.

Our Business Strategy

Our objective is to improve our leadership position in each of our core markets by increasing the number of
multi-year contracts with related customers and investing in highly automated production capacity to remain
competitive on a global scale. We intend to serve our customers and achieve this objective by continuing to:

Concentrate on our Core Markets.

We are the principal supplier of medium and heavy-duty truck axle
shafts in North America. We will continue to focus on those markets where we have the expertise, qualifications and
leadership position to sustain a competitive advantage. We have been an established supplier of manufacturing and
technical services to major aerospace & defense companies and agencies of the U.S. Government for over 39 years.
We are also the sole provider of calibration, certification and repair services for equipment used by the FAA to
maintain the radar systems and directional beacons at each of the airports it serves in the U.S., the Caribbean and the
South Pacific.

Dedicate our Resources to Support Strategic Partnerships. We will continue to dedicate our resources to
support the needs of industry leaders that embrace multi-year contractual relationships as a strategic component of
their supply chain management and have the potential for long-term growth. We prefer contracts that are sole-source
by part number so we can work closely with the customer to the mutual benefit of both parties. Visteon,

ArvinMeritor, and Dana have awarded us with sole-source supply agreements that run through 2006, 2013 and 2014,
respectively. In recent years, we have entered into multi-year manufacturing services agreements with Boeing,
General Dynamics, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon. Our success in establishing
outsourcing partnerships with key customers has led to additional contracts, and we believe that if we continue to
successfully perform on these contracts, we will have additional growth opportunities with these and other
customers.

Pursue the Strategic Acquisition of Customer-Owned Assets. We will continue to pursue the strategic
acquisition of customer-owned assets that serve to consolidate our position of leadership in our core markets, create
or strengthen our relationships with leading companies and expand our range of value-added services in return for
multi-year supply agreements. Since these assets are integrated with our core businesses, we generally are able to
use these assets to support other customers, thereby improving asset utilization and achieving greater productivity,
flexibility and economies of scale.

Grow Through the Addition of New Value-Added Services. We will continue to grow through the addition
of new value-added manufacturing capabilities and the introduction of additional components in the supply chain
that enable us to provide a more complete solution by improving quality and reducing product cost, inventory levels
and cycle times for our customers. We offer a variety of state-of-the-art machining capabilities to our customers in
the truck components & assemblies market that enable us to reduce labor and shipping costs and minimize cycle
times for our customers over the long-term, providing us with significant additional growth opportunities in the
future.

Invest to Increase our Competitiveness and that of our Partners. We will continue to invest in advanced
manufacturing and process technologies to reduce the cost of the services we provide for our customers on an
ongoing basis. We continue to expand and automate the services we provide to our customers in the truck
components & assemblies market, with approximately $130 million invested from 2000 to 2005. The automation
substantially increased our output per man hour and enabled us to offer our customers reduced pricing that helped
them to remain competitive on a global scale. Our ability to leverage this capability across a number of customers in
the future will further improve our capacity utilization, absorption of overhead and reduce our manufacturing costs.

We believe that the number and duration of our strategic relationships enable us to invest in our business
with greater certainty and with less risk than others that do not benefit from the type of longer term contractual
commitments we receive from many of our major customers. The investments we make in support of these contracts
provide us with the productivity, flexibility, technological edge and economies of scale that we believe will help to
differentiate us from the competition in the future when it comes to cost, quality, reliability and customer service.

Our Services and Products

We are a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. Our services consist of
manufacturing, technical and other services and products that are delivered as part of our customers’ overall supply
chain management. We provide our customers with services that exceed the scope of most manufacturing service
companies, including software development, design services, prototype development, product re-engineering,
feature enhancement, product ruggedization, cost reduction, product miniaturization, and electro-magnetic
interference and shielding. The information below is representative of the types of products we manufacture,
services we provide and the customers and industries for which we provide such products or services.

Truck Components & Assemblies:

ArvinMeritor ........................................... Axle shafts and drive train components for medium and heavy-duty

trucks and axle beams for trailers.

Dana ....................................................... Axle shafts, drive train components and steer axle components for use

in light, medium and heavy-duty trucks.

Visteon.................................................... Axle shafts for pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles.

Traxle...................................................... Axle shafts for heavy duty trucks.

Aerospace & Defense Electronics:

Boeing..................................................... Complex circuit cards for the Brimstone missile guidance systems.

Honeywell ............................................... Complex circuit cards for the color display systems of the AH-64D

Apache Longbow attack helicopter.

Lockheed Martin ..................................... Space electronics for the space shuttle and the international space

station and data systems for a fleet ballistic missile program.

National Security Agency ........................ Secure communications equipment, recording systems and encryption

devices.

Raytheon ................................................. Complex circuit cards and high level assemblies for use in satellite
communications systems, the AMRAAM (advanced, medium-range,
air attack missile) missile guidance system, and secure tactical
communication systems.

Test & Measurement Services:

AT&T ..................................................... Calibration and certification services at over 200 central and field

switching locations.

Federal Aviation Administration ............. Calibration and certification services at over 500 airports or airways

facilities.

Kodak...................................................... Calibration and certification services for the Rochester campus.

Lockheed Martin ..................................... Testing of electronic components for use in space and defense

applications.

National Weather Service ........................ Calibration and certification services for over 130 advanced warning

weather radar stations.

Manufacturing Services

Our manufacturing services typically involve the fabrication or assembly of a product or subassembly
according to specifications provided by our customers. We purchase raw materials or components from both
independent suppliers and from our customers in connection with performing our manufacturing services.

Our manufacturing capabilities are enhanced by advanced quality and manufacturing techniques, Lean
Manufacturing, just-in-time procurement and continuous flow manufacturing, statistical process control, total
quality management, stringent and real-time engineering change control routines and total cycle time reduction
techniques.

Industrial Manufacturing Services. We provide our customers with a wide range of capabilities, including
automated forging, extruding, machining, induction hardening, heat-treating and testing services to meet the
exacting requirements of our customers. We also design and fabricate production tooling, manufacture prototype
products and provide other value-added services for our customers.

Our manufacturing services contracts for the truck components & assemblies markets are generally sole-
source by part number. Part numbers may be specified for inclusion in a single model or a range of models. Where
we are the sole-source provider by part number, we are the exclusive provider to our customer of the specific parts
and for any replacements for these parts that may result from a design or model change for the duration of the
manufacturing contract.

Electronics Manufacturing Services. We provide our customers with a broad variety of solutions, from
low-volume prototype assembly to high-volume turnkey manufacturing. We employ a multi-disciplined engineering
team that provides comprehensive manufacturing and design support to customers. The manufacturing solutions we
offer include design conversion and enhancement, materials procurement, system assembly, testing and final system
configuration.

Our manufacturing services contracts for the aerospace & defense electronics market are generally sole-
source by part number. Where we are the sole-source provider by part number, we are the exclusive provider to our
customer of certain products for the duration of the manufacturing contract.

Technical Services

Test & Measurement Services. We calibrate, repair and certify the test & measurement equipment that is
used to maintain wireless communication equipment, control tower radar and direction beacons, NEXRAD Doppler
advanced warning weather service radar systems, digital oscilloscopes, microwave equipment and fiber optic
measuring equipment, among others. The applications cover the maintenance of cellular communications systems,
air traffic control systems, broadband telecommunication systems and quality certification programs in
manufacturing operations. We also perform a wide-range of testing services on a contract basis, including radio
frequency, microwave and mixed signal component testing, environmental testing, dynamics testing and failure
analysis, among others.

Products

In addition to our outsourced services, we provide some of our customers with specialized products
including digital and analog data systems and encryption devices used in military applications, magnetic meters and
sensors used in commercial and laboratory environments and high-pressure closures and joints used in pipeline and
chemical systems. With the growth of our services business, our products business has increasingly become a
smaller portion of our overall net revenue. We expect this trend to continue in the future.

Our Customers

Our customers include large, established companies and agencies of the federal government. We provide
some customers with a combination of outsourced services and products, while other customers may be in a single
category of our service or product offering. Our five largest customers in 2005 were ArvinMeritor, Dana, Raytheon,
Traxel and Visteon. These five customers accounted for 67% of 2005 net revenue. Our five largest customers in
2004 and 2003 were ArvinMeritor, Dana, Honeywell, Raytheon and Visteon. These five customers accounted for
67% and 51% of net revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, Dana and ArvinMeritor represented approximately 39% and 15%

of our net revenue, respectively. Similar amounts for the 2004 year ended were 36% and 15%, respectively.

Geographic Areas

Our operations are domiciled in the U.S. and Mexico. Our Mexican subsidiaries and affiliates are a part of
our Industrial Group and manufacture and sell a number of products similar to those the Industrial Group produces
in the U.S. In addition to normal business risks, operations outside the U.S. may be subject to a greater risk of
changing political, economic and social environments, changing governmental laws and regulations, currency
revaluations and market fluctuations.

Consolidated non-U.S. sales were $68.7 million, or 13% and $26.5 million, or 6% of our consolidated sales
in 2005 and 2004, respectively. In 2005 and 2004, our non-U.S. net income was $4.9 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, as compared to consolidated net income of $5.3 million and $8.3 million, respectively,. Non-U.S. sales
were not significant for 2003. You can find more information about our regional operating results in “Note 18
Segment Information” in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Sales and Business Development

Our principal sources of new business originate from the expansion of existing relationships, referrals and
direct sales through senior management, direct sales personnel, domestic and international sales representatives,
distributors and market specialists. We supplement these selling efforts with a variety of sales literature, advertising
in numerous trade media and participation in trade shows. We also utilize engineering specialists extensively to
facilitate the sales process by working with potential customers to reduce the cost of the service they need. Our
specialists achieve this objective by working with the customer to improve their product’s design for ease of

manufacturing, reducing the amount of set-up time or material that may be required to produce the product, or by
developing software that can automate the test and/or certification process. The award of contracts or programs can
be a lengthy process, which in some circumstances can extend well beyond 12 months. In addition, we have and
intend to selectively acquire assets from our customers in exchange for multi-year supply agreements and then
leverage the newly acquired manufacturing capabilities to additional customers.

Our objective is to increase the value of the services we provide to the customer on an annual basis beyond
the contractual terms that may be contained in a supply agreement. To achieve this objective, we commit to the
customer that we will continuously look for ways to reduce the cost, improve the quality, reduce the cycle time and
improve the life span of the products and/or services we supply the customer. Our ability to deliver on this
commitment over time is expected to have a significant impact on customer satisfaction, loyalty and follow-on
business.

Backlog

Our order backlog at December 31, 2005 was $252.3 million as compared to order backlog at
December 31, 2004 of $249.8 million. Backlog for the Industrial Group, the Aerospace & Defense segment and the
Test & Measurement segment at December 31, 2005 was $150.4 million, $98.2 million and, $3.7 million,
respectively. Backlog for the Industrial Group, the Aerospace & Defense segment and the Test & Measurement
segment at December 31, 2004 was $131.5 million, $113.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Backlog consists
of purchase orders with scheduled delivery dates and quantities. Total backlog at December 31, 2005 included
$238.6 million for orders that are expected to be filled within 12 months. Our backlog has varied from quarter to
quarter and may vary significantly in the future as a result of the timing of significant new orders and/or shipments,
order cancellations, material availability and other factors.

Competition

The outsourced manufacturing services markets that we serve are highly competitive, and we compete
against numerous domestic companies in addition to the internal capabilities of some of our customers. In the truck
components & assemblies market, we compete primarily against companies including Mid-West Forge, Inc.,
Spencer Forge and Machine, Inc. and Traxle, that serve as suppliers to many Tier I and smaller companies. In the
aerospace and defense electronics market, we compete primarily against companies including Jabil Circuit, Inc.,
LaBarge, Inc., Primus Technologies Corporation, Sparton Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. In
the test & measurement services market, we compete primarily against companies including SIMCO Electronics,
Transcat, Inc., Davis Inotek Instruments, and a variety of small, local, independent laboratories. We may face new
competitors in the future as the outsourcing industry evolves and existing or start-up companies develop capabilities
similar to ours.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets include the availability of capacity,
technological capability, flexibility, financial strength and timeliness in responding to design and schedule changes,
price, quality, delivery. Although we believe that we generally compete favorably with respect to each of these
factors, some of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and operating resources than we do. Some of
our competitors have greater geographic breadth and range of services than we do. We also face competition from
manufacturing operations of our current and potential customers that continually evaluate the relative benefits of
internal manufacturing compared to outsourcing. We believe our competitive position to be good, and the barriers to
entry to be high in the markets we serve.

Suppliers

For the majority of our business, we purchase raw materials and component parts from suppliers chosen by
our customers, at prices negotiated by our customers. When these suppliers increase their prices, cause delays in
production schedules or fail to meet our customers’ quality standards, our customers have contractually agreed to
reimburse us for the costs associated with such price increases and not to charge us for costs caused by such delays
or quality issues. Accordingly, our risks are primarily limited to accurate inspections of such materials, timely
communications, and the collection of such reimbursements or charges, along with any additional costs incurred by
us due to delays in, interruptions of, or non-optimal scheduling of, production schedules. For a smaller portion of

our business, we arrange our own suppliers and assume the additional risks of price increases, quality concerns and
production delays.

Raw steel and fabricated steel parts are a major component of our cost of sales and net revenue for the truck
components & assemblies business. We purchase the majority of our steel for use in this business at the direction of
our customers, with any periodic changes in the price of steel being reflected in the prices we are paid for our
services, such that we neither benefit from nor are directly harmed by any future changes in the price of steel.

There can be no assurance that supply interruptions or price increases will not slow production, delay
shipments to our customers or increase costs in the future, any of which could adversely affect our financial results.
Delays, interruptions, or non-optimal scheduling of production related to interruptions in raw materials supplies can
be expected to increase our costs.

Research and Development

Our research and development activities are mainly related to our product lines that serve the aerospace &
defense electronics market. Most of the expenditures related to our outsourced services are for process
improvements and are not reflected in research and development expense. Accordingly, our research and
development expense represents a relatively small percentage of our net revenue. We invested $2.8 million,
$3.7 million and $4.2 million in research and development in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We also utilize our
research and development capability to develop processes and technologies for the benefit of our customers.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

We own and are licensed under a number of patents and trademarks that we believe are sufficient for our
operations. Our business as a whole is not materially dependent upon any one patent, trademark, license or
technologically related group of patents or licenses.

We regard our manufacturing processes and certain designs as proprietary trade secrets and confidential
information. We rely largely upon a combination of trade secret laws, non-disclosure agreements with customers,
suppliers and consultants, and our internal security systems, confidentiality procedures and employee confidentiality
agreements to maintain the trade secrecy of our designs and manufacturing processes.

Government Regulation

Our operations are subject to compliance with regulatory requirements of federal, state and local
authorities, both in the U.S. and in Mexico, including regulations concerning financial reporting and controls, labor
relations, export and import matters, health and safety matters and protection of the environment. While compliance
with applicable regulations has not adversely affected our operations in the past, there can be no assurance that we
will continue to be in compliance in the future or that these regulations will not change or that the costs of
compliance will not be material to us.

We must comply with detailed government procurement and contracting regulations and with U.S.
Government security regulations, certain of which carry substantial penalty provisions for nonperformance or
misrepresentation in the course of negotiations. Our failure to comply with our government procurement,
contracting or security obligations could result in penalties or our suspension or debarment from government
contracting, which would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.

We are required to maintain U.S. Government security clearances at several of our locations. These
clearances could be suspended or revoked if we were found not to be in compliance with applicable security
regulations. Any such revocation or suspension would delay our delivery of products to customers. Although we
have adopted policies directed at ensuring our compliance with applicable regulations and there have been no
suspensions or revocations at any of our facilities, there can be no assurance that the approved status of our facilities
will continue without interruption.

We are also subject to comprehensive and changing federal, state and local environmental requirements,
both in the U.S. and in Mexico, including those governing discharges to air and water, the handling and disposal of

solid and hazardous wastes and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances.
We use hazardous substances in our operations and, as is the case with manufacturers in general, if a release of
hazardous substances occurs on or from our properties, we may be held liable and may be required to pay the cost of
remedying the condition. The amount of any resulting liability could be material.

Employees

As of December 31, 2005, we had a total of approximately 2,978 employees, 2,557 engaged in
manufacturing and providing our technical services, 53 engaged in sales and marketing, 152 engaged in engineering
and 216 engaged in administration. Approximately 1,489 of our employees are covered by collective bargaining
agreements with various unions that expire on various dates through 2009. Although we believe overall that our
relations with our labor unions are positive, there can be no assurance that present and future issues with our unions
will be resolved favorably, that negotiations will be successful or that we will not experience a work stoppage,
which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.

Internet Access

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-
K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website (www.sypris.com) as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file the material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business and Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report, and our other oral or written communications, may contain “forward-looking”
statements. These statements may include our expectations or projections about the future of our industries, business
strategies, potential acquisitions or financial results and our views about developments beyond our control including
domestic or global economic conditions, trends and market forces. These statements are based on management’s
views and assumptions at the time originally made and we undertake no obligation to update these statements, even
if, for example, they remain available on our website after our outlook has changed. There can be no assurance that
our expectations, projections or views will come to pass, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-
looking statements.

A number of significant risk factors could materially affect our specific business operations, and cause our
performance to differ materially from any future results projected or implied by our prior statements, including those
described below. Many of these risk factors are also identified in connection with the more specific descriptions
contained throughout this report.

Customers

Customer contracts could be less profitable than expected.

We generally bear the risk that our contracts could be unprofitable or less profitable than planned, despite
our estimates of revenues and future costs to complete such contracts. For contracts to which we apply the
“percentage of completion” accounting method, revisions to our cost estimates could reduce our operating results in
later periods.

A material portion of our business is conducted under multi-year contracts, which generally include fixed
prices or periodic price reductions without minimum purchase requirements. Our financial results are at greater risk
when we must accept contractual responsibility for raw material or component prices, when we cannot offset price
reductions and cost increases with operating efficiencies or other savings, when we must submit contract bid prices
before all key design elements are finalized or when we are subjected to other competitive pressures which erode
our margins. The profitability of our contracts also can be adversely affected by unexpected start-up costs on new

programs, operating inefficiencies, ineffective capital investments, inflationary pressures or inaccurate forecasts of
future unit costs.

In the past few years we have signed long-term supply agreements with Dana and ArvinMeritor and
acquired their facilities in Morganton, North Carolina, Kenton, Ohio and Toluca, Mexico, among other
manufacturing assets. Although these acquired facilities have well-established product markets, these customers or
their products may not continue to be successful, product enhancements may not be made in a timely fashion, our
long-term pricing agreements could generate lower margins than anticipated and there can be no assurance that we
will successfully integrate these operations. In addition, our failure to identify potential liabilities with respect to
certain indemnified environmental and other conditions, or our assertion of related claims, could adversely affect our
operating results or our customer relationships.

Dana (or any of our other significant customers who similarly seek bankruptcy protection) could seek to
terminate business with us, originate new business with our competitors, terminate or assign our long-term supply
agreements. Any loss of revenue from our major customers, including the non-payment or late payment of our
invoices could adversely affect our balance sheet, revenues, profitability and cash flows, debt covenants or access to
capital needed for operations.

Changing demands could reduce revenues or increase costs and harm operating results.

Unexpected changes in our customers’ demand levels have harmed our operating results in the past and
could do so in the future. Many of our customers will not commit to firm production or delivery schedules.
Disagreements over pricing, quality, delivery, capacity, exclusivity, or trade credit terms could disrupt order
schedules. Orders also fluctuate due to changing global capacity and demand, new products, changes in market
share, reorganizations or bankruptcies, material shortages, labor disputes or other factors that discourage
outsourcing. These forces could increase, decrease, accelerate, delay or cancel our delivery schedules.

Inaccurate forecasting of our customers’ requirements can disrupt the efficient utilization of our
manufacturing capacity, inventories or workforce. If we lose anticipated revenues, we might not succeed in
redeploying our substantial capital investment and other fixed costs. If we receive unanticipated orders, these
incremental volumes could be unprofitable due to the higher costs of operating above our optimal capacity.

We depend on a few key customers in challenging industries for most of our revenues.

Our five largest customers in 2005 were ArvinMeritor, Dana, Raytheon, Traxel and Visteon, collectively
accounting for 67% of 2005 net revenue. Our five largest customers in 2004 and 2003 were ArvinMeritor, Dana,
Honeywell, Raytheon and Visteon, collectively accounting for 67% and 51% of net revenue in 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The truck components & assemblies industry has experienced credit risk, labor unrest, rising steel
costs, bankruptcy and other obstacles, while the aerospace & defense electronics industry has seen consolidation and
uncertain funding.

We depend on the continued growth and financial stability of these customers, our core markets in these
industries and general economic conditions. Adverse changes affecting these customers, markets or general
conditions could harm our operating results. The truck components market is highly cyclical, due in part to
regulatory deadlines. Rising costs of steel or component parts have increased our inventory and working capital
levels and caused delays in payment from, or other difficulties for, our automotive customers. Many of these
customers’ labor disputes, financial difficulties and restructuring needs have created rising uncertainty and risk,
which could increase our costs or impair our business model. The aerospace & defense industry is pressured by
cyclicality, technological change, shortening product life cycles, decreasing margins, unpredictable funding levels
and government procurement processes. Any of these factors, particularly in our secured electronic communications
or missile programs, could impair our business model.

If any of our significant customers were restructured, the resulting entity could seek to terminate business
with us or originate new business with our competitors. Any loss of revenue from our major customers, including
the non-payment or late payment of our invoices could adversely affect our balance sheet, revenues, profitability and
cash flows.

As of February 24, 2006, we had provided approximately $54.8 million in combined trade credit
outstanding to ArvinMeritor, Dana and Visteon, each of which currently carries at least one “non-investment grade”

credit rating on its unsecured debt, indicating a high potential risk of default. There can be no assurance that any of
our customers will not default on, delay or dispute payment of, or seek to reject our outstanding invoices in
bankruptcy or otherwise.

On March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date), our largest customer, Dana, and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York. Dana's European, South American, Asia- Pacific, Canadian and Mexican
subsidiaries (Dana Mexico) were excluded from the Chapter 11 filing. As of the Filing Date, we had been paid for
substantially all outstanding Dana accounts receivable recorded in the balance sheet at December 31, 2005.
Accounts receivable from domestic Dana subsidiaries at the Filing Date could be subject to compromise, right of
offset or set aside as a protected payment under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing. For example, recently amended
bankruptcy law generally permits accounts payable to be offset against accounts receivable and offers protection for
the last 20 calendar days of shipments as an administrative priority expense in the bankruptcy. As of the Filing Date
and excluding certain gain contingencies, we estimated amounts due from Dana to approximate $28.6 million
including up to an estimated $13.0 million due from Dana Mexico, in addition to potential offsets from accounts
payable and other protected claims of $12.0 million, although right of offset and protected claims have not been
approved by the Bankruptcy Court. We continue to pursue additional offsets to further reduce our net receivable
position.

Dana may be unable to reorganize, reach acceptable terms with its creditor’s or emerge from Chapter 11.

We may:

•

•
•
•
•
•

be unable to obtain right of offset with regard to our outstanding domestic payables and
receivables;
be unable to secure 100% payment for shipments 20 calendar days prior to the Filing Date;
be required to refund payments made by Dana to us in the 90 days proceeding the Filing Date;
have our supply agreements rejected or assigned by Dana;
be required to settle all amounts due from Dana at discounted rates; or
be unable to negotiate acceptable terms with the reorganized Dana.

Dana (or any of our other significant customers who similarly seek bankruptcy protection) could seek to
terminate business with us or originate new business with our competitors. Any loss of revenue from our major
customers, including the non-payment or late payment of our invoices could adversely affect our balance sheet,
revenues, profitability and cash flows, debt covenants or access to capital needed for operations.

Congressional budgetary constraints or reallocations can reduce our government sales.

We sell manufacturing services and products to a number of government agencies, which in the aggregate
represented approximately 9% of our net revenue in 2005 and 2004. We also serve as a contractor for large
aerospace & defense companies such as Boeing, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon,
typically under federally funded programs. Sales to larger aerospace & defense customers, in the aggregate,
represented approximately 9% and 16% of net revenue during 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Our government contracts have many inherent risks that could adversely impact our financial results. These
contracts depend upon the continuing availability of Congressional appropriations. Future levels of governmental
spending, including delays, declines or reallocations in the funding of certain programs could adversely affect our
financial results, if we are unable to offset these changes with new business or cost reductions.

Suppliers

Interruptions in the supply of key components could disrupt production.

Some of our manufacturing services or products require one or more components that are available from a
limited number of providers or from sole-source providers. In the past, some of the materials we use, including steel,
certain forgings or castings, capacitors and memory and logic devices, have been subject to industry-wide shortages.
As a result, suppliers have been forced to allocate available quantities among their customers, and we have not been
able to obtain all of the materials desired. Our inability to reliably obtain these or any other materials when and as

needed could slow production or assembly, delay shipments to our customers, impair the recovery of our fixed costs
and increase the costs of recovering to customers’ schedules, including overtime, expedited freight, equipment
maintenance, operating inefficiencies, higher working capital and the obsolescence risks associated with larger
buffer inventories. Each of these factors could reduce operating results and net income.

Shortages or increased costs of utilities could harm our business and our customers.

We and our customers depend on a constant supply of electricity and natural gas from utility providers for
the operation of our respective businesses and facilities. In the past, we have experienced power outages which
reduced our ability to deliver products and our customers’ demand for those products. If we or our customers
experience future interruptions in service from these providers, our production and/or delivery of products could be
negatively affected. Additionally, due to the heavy consumption of energy in our production process and the
businesses of our customers, if the cost of energy significantly increases, our results of operations, and those of our
customers, could be negatively impacted.

Execution

We must operate more efficiently, or our results could decline.

If we are unable to improve the cost, efficiency and yield of our operations, our costs could increase and

our financial results could decline. A number of major obstacles could include:

•
•
•
•
•

inflationary pressures;
changes in anticipated product mix and the associated variances in our profit margins;
efforts to increase our manufacturing capacity and launch new programs;
the need to identify and eliminate our root causes of scrap;
our ability to achieve expected annual savings or other synergies from past and future business
combinations;
inventory risks due to shifts in market demand;
obsolescence;
price erosion of raw material or component parts;
shrinkage, or other factors affecting our inventory valuations; or
inability to successfully manage growth, contraction or competitive pressures in our primary
markets.

Our management or systems could be inadequate to support our existing or future operations. Growth in
our business could require us to invest in additional equipment to improve our efficiency. We may have limited
experience or expertise in installing or operating such equipment, which could negatively impact our ability to
deliver products on time or with acceptable costs. In addition, a material portion of our manufacturing equipment
requires significant maintenance to operate effectively and we may experience maintenance and repair issues. We
may also be required to relocate equipment between facilities, which could negatively impact our production
processes.

Our growth strategies could be ineffective due to the risks of further acquisitions.

Our growth strategy includes acquiring complementary businesses. We could fail to identify, finance or
complete suitable acquisitions on acceptable terms and prices. Acquisition efforts could increase a number of risks,
including:
•
•
•
•
•
•

diversion of management’s attention;
difficulties in integrating systems, operations and cultures;
potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired companies;
lack of experience operating in the geographic market of the acquired business;
an increase in our expenses and working capital requirements;
risks of entering into markets or producing products where we have limited or no experience,
including difficulties in integrating purchased technologies and products with our technologies and
products;
our ability to improve productivity and implement cost reductions;
our ability to secure collective bargaining agreements with employees; and
exposure to unanticipated liabilities.

•
•
•

Our discovery of, or failure to discover, material issues during due diligence investigations of acquisition
targets, either before closing with regard to potential risks of the acquired operations, or, after closing with regard to
the timely discovery of breaches of representations or warranties, or of certain indemnified environmental conditions
could seriously harm our business.

Competition

Increasing competition could limit or reduce our market share.

We operate in highly competitive environments that include our customers’ internal capabilities. We
believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets include the availability of manufacturing capacity,
technological strength, speed and flexibility in responding to design or schedule changes, price, quality, delivery,
cost management and financial strength. Our earnings could decline if our competitors or customers can provide
comparable speed and quality at a lower cost, or if we fail to adequately invest in the range and quality of
manufacturing services and products our customers require.

Some of our competitors have greater financial and organizational resources, customer bases and brand
recognition than we do. As a result, our competitors may respond more quickly to technological changes or
customer needs, consume lower fixed and variable unit costs, negotiate reduced component prices, and obtain better
terms for financing growth. If we fail to compete in any of these areas, we may lose market share and our business
could be seriously harmed. There can be no assurance that we will not experience increased competition or that we
will be able to maintain our profitability if our competitive environment changes.

Our technologies could become obsolete, reducing our revenues and profitability.

The markets for our products and services are characterized by changing technology and continuing
process development. The future of our business will depend in large part upon the continuing relevance of our
technological capabilities. We could fail to make required capital investments, develop or successfully market
services and products that meet changing customer needs, and anticipate or respond to technological changes in a
cost-effective and timely manner. We could encounter competition from new or revised technologies that render our
technologies and equipment less profitable or obsolete in our chosen markets, and our operating results may suffer.

Access to Capital

An inability to obtain favorable financing could impair our growth.

Our future liquidity and capital requirements are difficult to predict because they depend on numerous
factors, including the pace at which we grow our business and acquire new facilities. One method we have used to
obtain multi-year supply agreements is to buy a customer’s non-core manufacturing assets and produce products for
them. We may need to raise substantial additional funds in order to grow this business. We cannot be certain that we
will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all. Additional equity financing could result in
dilution to existing holders. If additional financing is obtained in the form of debt, the terms of the debt could place
restrictions on our ability to operate or increase the financial risk of our capital structure. Our ability to borrow under
our current credit facility is conditioned upon our compliance with various financial covenants. We could lose our
access to such financing if we experience adverse changes in our operations, poor financial results, increased risk
profiles of our businesses, declines in our credit ratings, any actual or alleged breach of our debt covenants,
insurance conditions or similar agreements, or any adverse regulatory developments.

Any inability to raise additional funds as needed could impair our ability to operate and grow our business.
Such financing could be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and
investor sentiment. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of additional financing
unattractive for us.

Contract Terminations

Contract terminations or delays could harm our business.

We often provide manufacturing services and products under contracts that contain detailed specifications,
quality standards and other terms. If we are unable to perform in accordance with such terms, our customers might
seek to terminate such contracts, or downgrade our past performance rating, an increasingly critical factor in federal
procurement competitions. Moreover, many of our contracts are subject to termination for convenience or upon

default. These provisions could provide only limited recoveries of certain incurred costs or profits on completed
work, and could impose liability for our customers’ costs in procuring undelivered items from another source. If any
of our significant contracts were to be terminated or not renewed, we would lose substantial revenues and our
operating results as well as prospects for future business opportunities would be adversely affected.

We are subject to various audits, reviews and investigations, including private party “whistleblower”
lawsuits, relating to our compliance with federal and state laws. Should our business be charged with wrongdoing,
or determined not to be a “presently responsible contractor,” we could be temporarily suspended or debarred for up
to three or more years from receiving new government contracts or government-approved subcontracts.

Labor Relations

We must attract and retain qualified employees.

Our future success in a changing business environment, including during rapid changes in the size,
complexity or skills required of our workforce, will depend to a large extent upon the efforts and abilities of our
executive, managerial and technical employees. The loss of key employees could have a material adverse effect on
our operations. Our future success will also require an ability to attract and retain qualified employees. Labor
disputes or changes in the cost of providing pension and other employee benefits, including changes in health care
costs, investment returns on plan assets, and discount rates used to calculate pension and related liabilities, could
lead to increased costs or disruptions of operations in any of our business units.

Disputes with labor unions could disrupt our business plans.

We currently have collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 1,489 employees, or
approximately 50% of total employees. Although we believe that our overall relations with our labor unions are
positive, we could experience a work stoppage or other disputes which could disrupt our operations and harm our
operating results.

Regulatory

Environmental, health and safety risks could expose us to potential liability.

We are subject to a variety of environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge and disposal
of hazardous chemicals and substances used in our operations. If we fail to comply with present or future
regulations, we could be forced to alter, suspend or discontinue our manufacturing processes, and pay substantial
fines or penalties.

Groundwater and other contamination has occurred at certain of our current and former facilities during the
operation of those facilities by their former owners, and this contamination may occur at future facilities we operate
or acquire. Although we typically receive environmental indemnification agreements from previous owners of these
facilities, there is no assurance that the indemnifications of former owners will be adequate to protect us from
liability.

Our Marion, Ohio facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds, semi-volatile and volatile organic compounds, certain metals, PCBs and other contaminants, some of
which exceed the state voluntary action program standards applicable to the site. We continue to test and assess this
site to determine the extent of this contamination by the prior owners of the facility. Under our purchase agreement
for this facility, Dana has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, environmental conditions that existed on
the site as of closing and as to which we notified Dana prior to December 31, 2002. Such amounts due from Dana, if
any, could be subject to compromise or rejection in conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

A leased facility we formerly occupied in Tampa, Florida is subject to remediation activities related to
groundwater contamination involving methyl chloride and other volatile organic compounds which occurred prior to
our use of the facility, and such contamination extends beyond the boundaries of the facility. The prior operator of
the facility has entered into a consent order with the State of Florida and agreed to remediate the contamination, the
full scope of which has not yet been determined. We previously acquired certain business assets formerly located at
a leased facility in Littleton, Colorado, where chlorinated solvents had been disposed of on site by a prior owner of
the business at the site, contaminating the groundwater at and around the site. The seller of the assets to us is

operating a remediation system on the site approved by the State of Colorado and has entered into a consent order
with the EPA providing for additional investigation at the site.

Our Morganton, North Carolina facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving
petroleum compounds, certain metals, and other contaminants, some of which exceed the State of North Carolina
standards applicable to the site. Under our purchase agreement for this facility, Dana has agreed to indemnify us for,
among other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing and as to which we notified Dana
prior to December 31, 2005. Such amounts due from Dana, if any, could be subject to compromise or rejection in
conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

Our Toluca, Mexico facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds and volatile organic compounds, among other concerns. We continue to test and assess this site to
determine the extent of any contamination by the prior owners of the facility. Under our purchase agreement for
each facility, Dana and Dana Mexico (Dana’s Mexican subsidiary, not currently a party to the bankruptcy) have
agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing and as
to which we notify Dana prior to June 30, 2006. Such amounts due from Dana, if any, could be subject to
compromise or rejection in conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

Our Kenton, Ohio facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds, volatile organic compounds, certain metals, PCBs and other contaminants. We continue to test and
assess this site to determine the extent of any contamination by the prior owners of the facility. Under our purchase
agreement for this facility, Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things,
environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing and as to which we notify ArvinMeritor prior to May
2, 2006.

Adverse regulatory developments or litigation could harm our business.

Our businesses operate in heavily regulated environments. We must successfully manage the risk of
changes in or adverse actions under applicable law or in our regulatory authorizations, licenses and permits,
governmental security clearances or other legal rights to operate our businesses, to manage our work force or to
import and export goods and services as needed. Our business activities expose us to the risks of litigation with
respect to our customers, suppliers, creditors, stockholders or from product liability, environmental or asbestos-
related matters. We also face the risk of other adverse regulatory actions, compliance costs or governmental
sanctions, as well as the costs and risks related to our ongoing efforts to design and implement effective internal
controls.

Other Risks

We face other factors which could seriously disrupt our operations.

Many other risk factors beyond our control could seriously disrupt our operations, including:

•

•
•

risks relating to war, future terrorist activities or political uncertainties which could shut down our
domestic or foreign facilities, disrupt transportation of products or supplies, or change the timing
and availability of funding in our aerospace & defense electronics markets;
risks inherent in operating abroad, including foreign currency exchange rates, adverse regulatory
developments, and miscommunications or errors due to inaccurate foreign language translations or
currency exchange rates;
risks relating to natural disasters or other casualties; or
our failure to anticipate or to adequately insure against other risks and uncertainties present in our
businesses including unknown or unidentified risks.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal manufacturing services operations are engaged in electronics manufacturing services for our
aerospace & defense customers and industrial manufacturing services for our truck components & assemblies
customers. The following chart indicates the significant facilities that we own or lease, the location and size of each
such facility and the manufacturing certifications that each facility possesses. The facilities listed below (other than
the corporate office) are used principally as manufacturing facilities.

Location

Market Served

Own or Lease
(Expiration)

Approximate
Square Feet

Certifications

Corporate Office:

Louisville, Kentucky

Manufacturing and Service Facilities:

Lease (2014)

13,800

Kenton, Ohio

Louisville, Kentucky

Marion, Ohio

Morganton, North Carolina

Orlando, Florida

Truck Components
& Assemblies

Test &
Measurement
Services

Own

540,000

QS 9000

467,000

QS 9000

255,000

QS 9000

342,000

62,000

QS 9000
ISO 14001

AS 9100
ISO 9001
ISO 17025/Guide 25
MIL-STD 750
MIL-STD 883
MIL-STD 202
MIL-STD 810

San Dimas, California

Tampa, Florida

Aerospace &
Defense Electronics

Lease (2015)

26,300

ISO 9001

Lease (2007)

318,000

ISO 9001
AS 9100
NASA-STD-8739
MIL-Q-9858A
IPC-A-610, Rev D,
Class 3
J-STD-001, Rev D,
Class 3

Toluca, Mexico

Truck Components
& Assemblies

Own

209,700

QS 9000

In addition, we lease space in 21 other facilities primarily utilized to provide technical services, all of which
are located in the U.S. We also own 10 ISO-certified mobile calibration units and one ISO-certified transportable field
calibration unit that are utilized to provide test & measurement services at customer locations throughout the U.S., the
Caribbean and the South Pacific.

Below is a listing and description of the various manufacturing certifications or specifications that we

utilize at our facilities.

Certification/Specification

Description

AS 9100...........................A quality management system developed by the aerospace industry to measure
supplier conformance with basic common acceptable aerospace quality requirements.

IPC-A-610 .......................A certification process for electronics assembly manufacturing which describes
materials, methods and verification criteria for producing high quality electronic
products. Class 3 specifically includes high performance or performance-on-demand
products where equipment downtime cannot be tolerated, end-use environment may
be uncommonly harsh, and the equipment must function when required.

J-STD-001 .......................A family of voluntary standards of industry-accepted workmanship criteria for

electronics assemblies.

ISO 9001..........................A certification process comprised of 20 quality system requirements to ensure
quality in the areas of design, development, production, installation and servicing of
products.

ISO 9002..........................A certification process similar to the ISO 9001 requirements, but it applies

principally to manufacturing services as opposed to engineering services.

ISO 14001........................A family of voluntary standards and guidance documents defining specific
requirements for an Environmental Management System.

ISO 17025/Guide 25 ........A certification process commonly referred to as A2LA, which sets out general
provisions that a laboratory must address to carry out specific calibrations or tests
and provides laboratories with direction for the development of a fundamental
quality management system.

MIL .................................A specification that signifies specific functions or processes that are conducted in
compliance with military specifications, such as a quality program, high-reliability
soldering, calibration and metrology, and environmental testing.

NASA-STD-8739.............A specification for space programs designated by the National Aeronautics and

Space Administration.

QS 9000...........................A certification process developed by the nation’s major automakers that focuses on
continuous improvement, defect reduction, variation reduction and elimination of
waste.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved from time to time in litigation and other legal or environmental proceedings incidental to

our business. There are currently no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party.

Ongoing environmental proceedings include the following:

• Our Marion, Ohio facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds, semi-volatile and volatile organic compounds, certain metals, PCBs and other
contaminants, some of which exceed the State of Ohio voluntary action program standards applicable
to the site. Under our purchase agreement for this facility, Dana has agreed to indemnify us for, among
other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing and as to which we notified
Dana prior to December 31, 2002. Such amounts due from Dana, if any, could be subject to
compromise or rejection in conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

• A leased facility we formerly occupied in Tampa, Florida is currently subject to remediation activities
related to groundwater contamination involving methylene chloride and other volatile organic
compounds which occurred prior to our use of the facility. The contamination extends beyond the
boundaries of the facility. In December 1986, Honeywell, a prior operator of the facility, entered into a
consent order with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation under which Honeywell
agreed to remediate the contamination, the full scope of which has not yet been determined. We
purchased the assets of a business formerly located on this leased site and operated that business from
1993 until December 1994. Philips Electronics, the seller of those assets, has agreed to indemnify us
with respect to environmental matters arising from groundwater contamination at the site prior to our
use of the facility. On November 3, 2004, Sypris Electronics was served as a co-defendant with
Honeywell International, Inc. and Phillips Electronics America Corporation in an environmental
lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Hillsborough County, Florida by Helen
Jones and other surrounding landowners, alleging various damages caused by such contamination.
Philips Electronics has agreed to pay for our defense costs and a motion to dismiss Sypris Electronics
has been filed.

•

In December 1992, we acquired certain business assets formerly located at a leased facility in Littleton,
Colorado. Certain chlorinated solvents disposed of on the site by Honeywell, a previous owner of the
business, have contaminated the groundwater at and around the site. Alliant Techsystems, from which
we acquired the business assets, operates a remediation system approved by the State of Colorado and
has also entered into a consent order with the EPA providing for additional investigation at the site.
Alliant Techsystems has agreed to indemnify us with respect to these matters.

• Our Morganton, North Carolina facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving
petroleum compounds, certain metals, and other contaminants, some of which exceed the State of
North Carolina standards applicable to the site. Under our purchase agreement for this facility, Dana
has agreed to indemnify us for, among other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as
of closing and as to which we notified Dana prior to December 31, 2005. Such amounts due from
Dana, if any, could be subject to compromise or rejection in conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11
filing.

• Our Toluca, Mexico facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds and volatile organic compounds, among other concerns. We continue to test and assess this
site to determine the extent of any contamination by the prior owners of the facility. Under our
purchase agreement for each facility, Dana and Dana Mexico has agreed to indemnify us for, among
other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing and as to which we notify
Dana prior to June 30, 2006. Such amounts due from Dana, if any, could be subject to compromise or
rejection in conjunction with Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

• Our Kenton, Ohio facility is subject to soil and groundwater contamination involving petroleum
compounds, volatile organic compounds, certain metals, PCBs and other contaminants. We continue to
test and assess this site to determine the extent of any contamination by the prior owners of the facility.
Under our purchase agreement for this facility, Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems has agreed to
indemnify us for, among other things, environmental conditions that existed on the site as of closing
and as to which we notify ArvinMeritor prior to May 2, 2006.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended

December 31, 2005.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “SYPR.” The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common stock as reported by the
Nasdaq National Market.

High

Low

Year ended December 31, 2004:

First Quarter........................................................................................... $ 21.90
21.17
Second Quarter.......................................................................................
14.23
Third Quarter .........................................................................................
16.81
Fourth Quarter........................................................................................

Year ended December 31, 2005:

First Quarter........................................................................................... $ 15.57
12.77
Second Quarter.......................................................................................
14.30
Third Quarter .........................................................................................
11.15
Fourth Quarter........................................................................................

As of February 28, 2006, there were 1,046 holders of record of our common stock.

$ 17.00
17.25
11.08
12.98

$ 10.61
8.52
10.74
8.88

On September 22, 2002, our Board of Directors declared an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 per common
share outstanding. Cash dividends of $0.03 per common share have been paid quarterly since the initial dividend was declared
in 2002. Dividends may be paid on common stock only when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors in its sole
discretion.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of this Form
10-K. The selected financial data set forth below as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the three years included in the
period ended December 31, 2005 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form
10-K, and the data below are qualified by reference to those consolidated financial statements and related notes. The financial
statement data at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Form 10-K.

Consolidated Income Statement Data:

2005

Years Ended December 31,
2003(1)
Restated

2004(1)(2)(3)
Restated
(in thousands, except per share data)

2002(1)

2001(1)(4)(5)

Restated Restated

Net revenue .......................................................................................... $ 522,766 $ 425,402 $ 276,605 $ 273,477 $ 254,640
Cost of sales .........................................................................................
211,165

471,428

230,660

371,963

223,936

Gross profit...........................................................................................

Selling, general and administrative.......................................................
Research and development ...................................................................
Amortization of intangible assets .........................................................
Operating income .................................................................................

51,338

35,669
2,833
614
12,222

53,439

35,248
3,697
596
13,898

Interest expense, net .............................................................................
Other (income) expense, net .................................................................

5,979
(1,325)

2,100
(138)

45,945

26,711
4,166
194
14,874

1,693
230

49,541

27,114
3,354
97
18,976

2,742
(159)

Income before income taxes .................................................................

Income tax expense ..............................................................................

7,568

2,247

11,936

12,951

16,393

3,637

4,860

4,940

43,475

26,134
3,054
1,329
12,958

4,111
(358)

9,205

2,887

Net income ........................................................................................... $

5,321 $

8,299 $

8,091 $ 11,453 $

6,318

Net income per share:
Basic................................................................................................... $
Diluted................................................................................................ $

0.30 $
0.29 $

0.48 $
0.47 $

0.57 $
0.56 $

Cash dividends declared per common share ......................................... $

0.12 $

0.87
0.84

0.06

$
$

0.64
0.63

$ —

Shares used in computing per share amounts:
Basic...................................................................................................
Diluted................................................................................................

18,016
18,323

17,119
17,745

14,237
14,653

13,117
13,664

9,828
10,028

2005

December 31,

2004(1)(2)(3) 2003(1)(3)
Restated
Restated
(in thousands)

2002(1)
Restated

2001(1)(4)(5)
Restated

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Cash and cash equivalents .................................................................... $ 12,060 $ 14,060 $ 12,019 $ 12,403 $ 13,232
68,312
Working capital ....................................................................................
212,431
Total assets ...........................................................................................
7,500
Current portion of long-term debt.........................................................
80,000
Long-term debt, net of current portion .................................................
70,761
Total stockholders’ equity ....................................................................

111,765
417,624
—
80,000
213,734

143,123
431,178
7,000
110,000
208,939

81,456
264,435
3,200
53,000
145,392

78,600
224,612
7,000
30,000
137,690

(1) On January 1, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for inventory and cost of sales at one manufacturing facility. Prior year
amounts have been restated as required for comparability. The change increased previously reported earnings for the year ended 2004 by
$892, or $0.05 per diluted share. The change (decreased) increased previously reported earnings for 2003, 2002 and 2001 by $(44), $13 and
$(49), respectively, which did not change per diluted share amounts.

(2) On May 3, 2004 and June 30, 2004, respectively, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of ArvinMeritor’s Kenton, Ohio facility and

Dana’s Toluca, Mexico facility and their results of operations and related purchased assets are included from those dates forward.
(3) On December 31, 2003, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of Dana’s Morganton, North Carolina facility and its results of

operations and related purchased assets are included from that date forward.

(4) On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” which

required us to discontinue the amortization of goodwill. Amortization of goodwill decreased earnings per diluted share by $0.08 in the year
ended December 31, 2001.

(5) On May 31, 2001, we completed the acquisition of the net assets of Dana’s Marion, Ohio facility and its results of operations and related

purchased assets are included from that date forward.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition should be read
together with the other financial information and consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from the results anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including
those discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Change in Method of Accounting

During the first quarter of 2005, our Industrial Group changed its method of accounting for certain
inventory and cost of sales at our Louisville manufacturing facility to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method from the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method used in all prior years. As a result, all inventories are now stated at the lower of cost,
determined on a FIFO basis, or market. Prior to this voluntary change in accounting principle, approximately 13% of
our total inventory as previously reported was valued using LIFO and the remaining inventories were valued using
FIFO.

The change is preferable because it results in conforming all of our inventories to a uniform method of
accounting subsequent to a series of acquisitions from 2001 through 2004. In addition, inventories will be valued in
a manner which more closely approximates current cost, and FIFO is the prevalent method used by other entities
within our industry and provides a more meaningful and understandable presentation of financial position to users of
our consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, the consolidated
financial statements for all prior periods have been adjusted to retroactively apply this change in accounting
principle. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the change from LIFO to FIFO reduced previously reported cost
of sales for our Industrial Group by $1.3 million which resulted in corresponding increases in gross profit, operating
income and income before taxes. The effect of the accounting change on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per
common share as previously reported by quarter for 2004 is:

Year ended December 31, 2004

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Total

(in thousands, except per share data)

Net income (loss):

Previously reported .............................. $ 3,399
(74)
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $ 3,325

$ 1,984
—
$ 1,984

$ 3,487
304
$ 3,791

$ (1,463)
662
(801)

$ 7,407
892
$ 8,299

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

Previously reported .............................. $
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $

0.23
(0.01)
0.22

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

Previously reported .............................. $
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $

0.22
(0.01)
0.21

0.11
—
0.11

0.19
0.02
0.21

(0.08)
0.04
(0.04)

0.43
0.05
0.48

0.42
0.05
0.47

The effect of the accounting change on net income and earnings per common share as previously reported

for the year ended December 31, 2003 (in thousands, except per share data) is:

Net income:

Previously reported ..................................................................................... $
Increase (decrease)......................................................................................
Restated ...................................................................................................... $

8,135
(44)
8,091

Basic earnings per common share:

Diluted earnings per common share:

0.57
—
0.57

0.56
—
0.56

The retroactive restatement of the change in accounting method increased previously reported inventory,
retained earnings and noncurrent deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2004 by $2.2 million, $1.5 million and $0.7
million, respectively. The restatement had no impact on operating cash flow.

Overview

We are a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. We perform a wide range of
manufacturing, engineering, design, testing and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source
contracts with major companies and government agencies in the markets for aerospace & defense electronics, truck
components & assemblies, and test & measurement services. Revenue from our three core markets accounted for
approximately 96% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005, while revenue from our outsourced
services accounted for approximately 93% of our revenue. We expect these percentages to increase in the future.

Our objective is to become the leading outsourcing specialist in each of our core markets for aerospace &
defense electronics, truck components & assemblies, and test & measurement services. We have focused our efforts
on establishing long-term relationships with industry leaders who embrace multi-year contractual relationships as a
strategic component of their supply chain management.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported. Changes in facts and circumstances could have a significant impact on the resulting estimated amounts
included in our consolidated financial statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more complex judgments and estimates. We also have other policies that we consider to be key accounting policies,
such as our policies for revenue recognition in the Industrial Group, including cost of sales; however, these policies
do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates because they do not generally require us to make
estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective.

Long-term Contract Net Revenue.

A large part of our Aerospace & Defense segment business is derived
from long-term contracts for development, production and service activities which we account for consistent with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA) audit and accounting guide, Audits of Federal
Government Contractors, the AICPA’s Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-
Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and other relevant revenue recognition accounting literature, as
applicable. We consider the nature of these contracts and the types of products and services provided when we
determine the proper accounting for a particular contract.

Primarily, we record long-term, fixed-price contracts on a percentage of completion basis using units-of-
delivery to measure progress toward completing the contract and recognizing net revenue. Revenue is recognized
on these contracts when units are shipped or delivered to the customer, as applicable, with unit revenue based upon
unit prices as set forth in the applicable contracts. The costs attributed to contract revenue are based upon the
estimated average costs of all units to be shipped. For example, we use this method of revenue recognition on our
encryption programs. In less frequent circumstances, we enter into milestone specific, fixed-price contracts for
which net revenue is recorded when we achieve performance milestones. Revenue recognized under such milestones
is limited to net revenue that we would recognize under the cost-to-cost method. Under the cost-to-cost method of
accounting, revenue is recognized based on the ratio of costs incurred to our estimate of total costs at completion.
For example, we use this methodology for our CEC, Common Card and KI-17 programs. As we incur costs under
cost-reimbursement-type contracts, we record net revenue. Cost-reimbursement-type contracts include time and
materials and other level-of-effort-type contracts. An example of this type of revenue recognition includes the
JWARN program.

As a general rule, we recognize net revenue and profits earlier in a production cycle when we use the cost-
to-cost and milestone methods of percentage of completion accounting than when we use the units-of-delivery
method. In addition, our profits and margins may vary materially depending on the types of long-term government
contracts undertaken, the costs incurred in their performance, the achievement of other performance objectives, and
the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees is finally determined.

Contract accounting requires judgment relative to assessing risks, estimating contract revenues and costs,
and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. Due to the size and nature of many of our contracts, the
estimation of total revenue and cost at completion is complicated and subject to many variables. Contract costs
include material, labor and subcontracting costs, as well as an allocation of indirect costs. Assumptions have to be
made regarding the length of time to complete the contract because costs also include expected increases in wages
and prices for materials. For contract change orders, claims or similar items, we apply judgment in estimating the
amounts and assessing the potential for realization. These amounts are only included in contract value when they
can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable.

The majority of our Aerospace & Defense segment net revenue is driven by pricing based on costs incurred
to produce products or perform services under contracts with the U.S. Government, and therefore not necessarily on
market-based factors. Cost-based pricing is determined under the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). The FAR
provides guidance on the types of costs that are allowable in establishing prices for goods and services under U.S.
Government contracts. For example, costs such as those related to charitable contributions, advertising, interest
expense, and public relations are unallowable, and therefore not recoverable through net revenue.

Approximately 16%, 18% and 35% of total net revenue was recognized under the percentage of completion
method based on units of delivery during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Approximately 2%, 3% and 5% of
total net revenue was recognized under the percentage of completion method based on milestones or cost-to-cost
during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Therefore, the amounts we record in our consolidated financial statements
using contract accounting methods and cost accounting standards are material. Because of the significance of the
judgments and estimation processes, it is likely that materially different amounts could be recorded if we used
different assumptions or if the underlying circumstances were to change. When adjustments in estimated contract
revenues or costs are required, any changes from prior estimates are generally included in earnings in the current
period. We closely monitor compliance with and the consistent application of our critical accounting policies related
to contract accounting. In addition to less formal monthly reviews, management in the Aerospace & Defense
segment formally assess the status of contracts on a quarterly basis through extensive estimate at completion reviews
which include multiple levels of program personnel. Costs incurred and allocated to contracts with the U.S.

Government are reviewed for compliance with regulatory standards by our personnel, and are subject to audit by the
Defense Contract Audit Agency.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We establish reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable based on
overall receivable aging levels, a specific evaluation of accounts for customers with known financial difficulties and
evaluation of customer chargebacks, if any. These reserves and corresponding write-offs could significantly increase
if our customers experience deteriorating financial results or in the event we receive a significant chargeback which
is deemed uncollectible.

Impairments. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment by calculating the estimated fair value of
each business with which goodwill is associated. The estimated fair value is based on a discounted cash flow
analysis that requires judgment in our evaluation of the business and establishing an appropriate discount rate and
terminal value to apply in the calculations. In selecting these and other assumptions for each business, we consider
historical performance, forecasted operating results, general market conditions and industry considerations specific
to the business. It is possible that the assumptions underlying the impairment analysis will change in such a manner
that impairment charges may occur. We likely would compute a materially different fair value for a business if
different assumptions were used or if circumstances were to change.

At December 31, 2005, net assets of our Test & Measurement segment were $13.6 million, including
goodwill of $6.9 million. Our Test & Measurement segment reported an operating loss in 2004 of $0.4 million,
primarily as a result of decreased product sales, cost and process inefficiencies on certain technical services provided
by this segment and an unfavorable mix of technical service revenue. A new senior management team was installed
in 2003 for this segment and spending for sales, marketing, research and development were increased in 2004 to
grow the revenue base, and various organizational changes were made to improve the operations. In 2005, such
investments yielded increased net revenue and gross margin resulting in $0.4 million of operating income. As 2005
restructuring efforts continue to pay back, further operating income improvement is expected in 2006. If continued
improvement in our Test & Measurement operations is not achieved and profitability deteriorates, we may be
required to record an impairment charge to goodwill for the Test & Measurement segment.

The recoverability of long-lived assets is evaluated if impairment indicators exist. Indicators of impairment
include historical financial performance, operating trends and our future operating plans. If impairment indicators
exist, we evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets based on forecasted undiscounted cash flows. If an
impairment has occurred, the long-lived asset is written down to its estimated fair value on a discounted basis. The
estimation of future cash flows requires management’s judgment concerning historical performance, forecasted
operating results, general market conditions and industry considerations specific to the assets. There are inherent
uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgments in applying these factors to the analysis of long-
lived asset impairment. It is possible that the assumptions underlying the impairment analysis will change in such a
manner that impairment charges may occur. We likely would compute a materially different estimate of future cash
flows if different assumptions were used or if circumstances were to change.

Reserve for Excess, Obsolete and Scrap Inventory We record inventory at the lower of cost, determined
under the first-in, first-out method, or market. Because of the stability of product costs in recent years, and the level
of gross profit margins on most products, we have not made any material adjustments to write down inventory to
market. However, we do reserve for excess, obsolete or scrap inventory. These reserves are primarily based upon
management's assessment of the salability of the inventory, historical usage of raw materials, historical demand for
finished goods, and estimated future usage and demand. An improper assessment of salability or improper estimate
of future usage or demand, or significant changes in usage or demand could result in significant changes in the
reserves and a positive or a negative impact on our consolidated results of operations in the period the change
occurs.

Results of Operations

The tables presented below, which compare our consolidated results of operations from one year to another,
present the results for each year, the change in those results from one year to another in both dollars and percentage
change and the results for each year as a percentage of net revenue. The columns present the following:

• The first two data columns in each table show the absolute results for each year presented.

• The columns entitled “Year Over Year Change” and “Year Over Year Percentage Change” show the
change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These two columns show favorable changes as
positive and unfavorable changes as negative. For example, when our net revenue increases from one
year to the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns. Conversely, when
expenses increase from one year to the next, that change is shown as a negative number in both
columns.

• The last two columns in each table show the results for each period as a percentage of net revenue. In
these two columns, the cost of sales and gross profit for each are given as a percentage of that
segment’s net revenue. These amounts are shown in italics.

In addition, as used in these tables, “NM” means “not meaningful.”

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004

Years Ended
December 31,

2004 (1)

Year Over
Year
Change
Favorable

2005

Restated (Unfavorable)

Year Over
Year
Percentage
Change
Favorable
(Unfavorable)

Results as Percentage of
Net Revenue for the
Years Ended
December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands, except percentage data)

Net revenue:

Industrial Group ....................................................... $ 359,602 $ 260,410 $ 99,192

38.1 %

68.8 %

61.2 %

Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 115,863
Test & Measurement............................................... 47,301
Electronics Group..................................................... 163,164
Total net revenue.................................................... 522,766

119,179
45,813
164,992
425,402

(3,316)
1,488
(1,828)

(2.8)
3.2
(1.1)
22.9

97,364

Cost of sales:
Industrial Group ....................................................... 336,686
Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 98,367
Test & Measurement............................................... 36,375
Electronics Group..................................................... 134,742
Total cost of sales ................................................... 471,428

235,406
99,895
36,662
136,557
371,963

(101,280) (43.0)
1.5
0.8
1.3
(99,465) (26.7)

1,528
287
1,815

Gross profit:
Industrial Group ....................................................... 22,916
Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 17,496
Test & Measurement............................................... 10,926
Electronics Group..................................................... 28,422
Total gross profit .................................................... 51,338

25,004
19,284
9,151
28,435
53,439

(2,088)
(1,788)
1,775

(8.4)
(9.3)
19.4
(13) NM
(3.9)

(2,101)

Selling, general and administrative.............................. 35,669
2,833
Research and development..........................................
614
Amortization of intangible assets ................................

35,248
3,697
596

(421)
864
(18)

(1.2)
23.4
(3.0)

Operating income ....................................................... 12,222

13,898

(1,676) (12.1)

Interest expense, net ...................................................
Other income, net .......................................................

5,979
(1,325)

2,100
(138)

(3,879) (184.7)
(860.1)
1,187

Income before income taxes........................................

7,568

11,936

(4,368) (36.6)

Income taxes ..............................................................

2,247

3,637

1,390

38.2

22.2
9.0
31.2
100.0

93.6
84.9
76.9
82.6
90.2

6.4
15.1
23.1
17.4
9.8

6.8
0.6
0.1

2.3

1.1
(0.2)

1.4

0.4

28.0
10.8
38.8
100.0

90.4
83.8
80.0
82.8
87.4

9.6
16.2
20.0
17.2
12.6

8.3
0.9
0.1

3.3

0.5
-

2.8

0.9

Net income................................................................. $ 5,321 $ 8,299 $ (2,978) (35.9) %

1.0 %

1.9 %

(1) On January 1, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for inventory and cost of sales at one manufacturing facility. The change

increased previously reported earnings for the year ended 2004 by $892, or $0.05 per diluted share.

Backlog. Our backlog increased $2.4 million to $252.3 million at December 31, 2005, on $525.2 million
in net orders in 2005 compared to $476.4 million in 2004. We expect to convert approximately 95% of the backlog
at December 31, 2005 to revenue during 2006.

Backlog for our Industrial Group increased $18.9 million to $150.4 million at December 31, 2005, on
$378.9 million in net orders in 2005 compared to $318.7 million in 2004. We expect to convert substantially all of
the Industrial Group’s backlog at December 31, 2005 to revenue during 2006.

Backlog for our Aerospace & Defense segment decreased $15.7 million to $98.2 million at December 31,
2005, on $99.9 million in net orders in 2005 compared to $113.3 million in 2004. Backlog for our Test &
Measurement segment decreased $0.7 million to $3.7 million at December 31, 2005 on $46.5 million in net orders in
2005 compared to $44.4 million in 2004. We expect to convert approximately 86% of the Aerospace & Defense
backlog and approximately 96% of the Test & Measurement backlog at December 31, 2005 to revenue during 2006.

Net Revenue.

Net revenue in the Industrial Group for the year increased due to higher volume resulting
from the new ArvinMeritor and Dana contracts that started in May and June of 2004, respectively. These new
contracts with ArvinMeritor for trailer axle beams and various drive train components and with Dana for steer axles,
drive axle shafts and drive train components for the light, medium and heavy-duty truck markets generated
outsourced services revenue of $213.2 million in 2005, as compared to $142.5 million in 2004. Excluding the new
contracts, the Industrial Group’s net revenue increased $28.5 million, or 24.2%, in 2005, primarily due to record
demand for medium and heavy-duty trucks as a result of pre-buy activity ahead of a change in domestic emission
requirements.

The Aerospace & Defense segment derives its revenue from manufacturing services, other outsourced
services and product sales. Manufacturing services revenue accounted for approximately 81% and 75% of total
Aerospace & Defense segment revenue in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Manufacturing services revenue increased
$3.8 million in 2005 primarily due to increased volume on two military programs and revenue from new customers
for initial shipments on new contracts. Net revenue from technical outsourced services decreased $3.2 million in
2005 primarily due to the completion of an engineering program in 2004. Net revenue from product sales decreased
$3.9 million primarily due to decreased demand for legacy data storage products.

The Test & Measurement segment derives its revenue from technical services and product sales. Technical
services revenue accounted for approximately 84% and 87% of total Test & Measurement revenue in 2005 and
2004, respectively. Products sales increased $1.4 million in 2005, primarily due to increased shipments on a military
program, while revenue from technical services was consistent with the prior year.

Gross Profit.

The Industrial Group’s gross profit decreased $2.1 million in 2005 associated with start-up
programs and capacity constraints in addition to increased energy costs. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
decreased to 6.4% for 2005 from 9.6% in 2004, primarily due to costs associated with the increase in manufacturing
capacity, launch of new programs, overtime to meet customer shipment schedules and increased natural gas costs.
We expect Lean and other cost reduction initiatives along with reductions in capital expansion in 2006 to result in
gross profit increases throughout 2006. The factors impacting gross profit in the fourth quarter included higher
natural gas and overtime along with the impact of declining overhead absorption rates resulting from inventory
reduction initiatives.

The Aerospace & Defense segment’s gross profit decreased $1.8 million in 2005 primarily due to lower
data storage product sales and technical outsourced revenue. Lower overhead absorption attributable to decreased
product revenue reduced gross profit by $1.2 million for 2005. Technical outsourced services gross profit decreased
by $0.6 from 2004 primarily due to lower revenue. Gross margin for the Aerospace & Defense segment was 15.1%
in 2005 as compared to 16.2% in 2004. The decrease in gross margin resulted primarily from the lower volume and
related margins for product sales, which was partially offset by higher volume for manufacturing services.

The Test & Measurement segment’s gross profit increased $1.8 million in 2005 primarily due to the
increased product sales combined with lower personnel costs resulting from headcount reductions in the first half of
2005.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.4 million
in 2005 and decreased as a percentage of net revenue to 6.8% in 2005 from 8.3% in 2004. The Industrial Group’s
selling, general and administrative expense accounted for $0.3 million of the increase, primarily due to higher
administrative costs related to additional infrastructure to support the new contracts in the Industrial Group and the
overall growth of the business. The Test & Measurement segment also increased selling expense to drive increased
revenue, which was offset by reductions in selling, general and administrative expense in the Aerospace & Defense
segment resulting from reduced headcount.

Research and Development. Research and development costs decreased $0.9 million in 2005 due to the
successful completion and launch of one of our data systems product development projects within our Aerospace &
Defense segment in the last half of 2005. Such costs are expected to decline in 2006 as other product development
projects are completed.

Amortization of Intangible Assets.

Amortization of intangible assets increased in 2005 primarily due to
certain identifiable intangible assets acquired in connection with the ArvinMeritor and Dana contracts that started in
May and June of 2004, respectively.

Interest Expense, Net.

Interest expense increased in 2005 due to an increase in our weighted average debt
outstanding and higher interest rates. Our weighted average debt outstanding increased to $115.9 million during
2005 from $51.5 million during 2004. The increase in debt primarily related to the Industrial Group’s acquisitions
and capital expenditures to increase capacity and automation. The weighted average interest rate increased to 5.2%
in 2005 from 4.8% in 2004. Our effective interest rate is expected to increase in 2006 due to expected increased
market rates under our credit agreement; however, interest costs are expected to decline in 2006 due to a
continuation of working capital reduction initiatives which reduced net debt by $38.3 million in the second half of
2005.

Other Income, Net. Other income, net increased $1.2 million in 2005 due primarily to foreign currency

remeasurement gains of U.S. Dollar denominated accounts of our foreign subsidiaries.

Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 29.7% in 2005 as compared to 30.5% for 2004. The
decrease primarily relates to the full year impact of our Mexico operations acquired on June 30, 2004, for which the
2005 statutory tax rate is 30.0%. In 2005 and 2004, tax expense was reduced by $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, as a result of the resolution of various domestic federal and state tax liabilities which proved to be less
than original estimates.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Years Ended
December 31,

2004 (1)
Restated

2003 (1)

Restated (Unfavorable)

Year Over
Year
Change
Favorable

Year Over
Year
Percentage
Change
Favorable
(Unfavorable)

Results as Percentage of
Net Revenue for the
Years Ended
December 31,

2004

2003

Net revenue:

(in thousands, except percentage data)

Industrial Group ....................................................... $ 260,410 $ 95,872 $ 164,538
Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 119,179
Test & Measurement............................................... 45,813
Electronics Group..................................................... 164,992
Total net revenue.................................................... 425,402

141,597
39,136
180,733
276,605

(22,418) (15.8)
17.1
(8.7)
53.8

6,677
(15,741)
148,797

171.6 %

61.2 %
28.0
10.8
38.8
100.0

34.7 %
51.2
14.1
65.3
100.0

Cost of sales:
Industrial Group ....................................................... 235,406
Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 99,895
Test & Measurement............................................... 36,662
Electronics Group..................................................... 136,557
Total cost of sales ................................................... 371,963

Gross profit:
Industrial Group ....................................................... 25,004
Aerospace & Defense ............................................. 19,284
9,151
Test & Measurement...............................................
Electronics Group..................................................... 28,435
Total gross profit .................................................... 53,439

86,193
112,717
31,750
144,467

(149,213) (173.1)
11.4
12,822
(4,912) (15.5)
5.5
7,910

230,660

(141,303) (61.3)

9,679
28,880
7,386
36,266
45,945

15,325

158.3
(9,596) (33.2)
1,765
23.9
(7,831) (21.6)
16.3
7,494

Selling, general and administrative.............................. 35,248
3,697
Research and development..........................................
596
Amortization of intangible assets ................................

26,711
4,166
194

(8,537) (32.0)
469
11.3
(402) (207.2)

Operating income ....................................................... 13,898

14,874

(976)

(6.6)

Interest expense, net ...................................................
Other (income) expense, net........................................

2,100
(138)

1,693
230

(407) (24.0)
368

Income before income taxes........................................ 11,936

12,951

(1,015)

(7.8)

Income taxes ..............................................................

3,637

4,860

1,223

25.2

90.4
83.8
80.0
82.8
87.4

9.6
16.2
20.0
17.2
12.6

8.3
0.9
0.1

3.3

0.5
-

2.8

0.9

89.9
79.6
81.1
79.9
83.4

10.1
20.4
18.9
20.1
16.6

9.6
1.5
0.1

5.4

0.6
0.1

4.7

1.8

Net income................................................................. $ 8,299 $ 8,091 $

208

2.5 %

1.9 %

2.9 %

(1) On January 1, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for inventory and cost of sales at one manufacturing facility. The change
increased previously reported earnings for the year ended 2004 by $892, or $0.05 per diluted share, while decreasing previously reported
earnings for 2003 by $44, which did not change the per diluted share amount.

Backlog. Our backlog increased $50.8 million to $249.8 million at December 31, 2004, on $476.4 million

in net orders in 2004 compared to $321.7 million in 2003.

Backlog for our Industrial Group increased $58.3 million to $131.5 million at December 31, 2004, on

$318.7 million in net orders in 2004 compared to $130.2 million in 2003.

Backlog for our Aerospace & Defense segment decreased $6.0 million to $113.9 million at December 31,
2004, on $113.3 million in net orders in 2004 compared to $150.6 million in 2003. Backlog for our Test &
Measurement segment decreased $1.5 million to $4.4 million at December 31, 2004, on $44.4 million in net orders
in 2004 compared to $40.9 million in 2003.

The Industrial Group entered into new multi-year contracts on December 31, 2003, May 3,
2004 and June 30, 2004 and, on each of the respective dates, acquired certain manufacturing assets from its

Net Revenue.

customers in connection with the new contracts. These contracts included two with Dana for steer axle components,
drive axle shafts and various drive train components for the light, medium and heavy-duty truck markets and one
with ArvinMeritor for trailer axle beams and various drive train components. The new contracts generated
outsourced services revenue of $142.5 million in 2004. Excluding the new contracts, the Industrial Group’s net
revenue increased $22.0 million for the year primarily due to a general increase in demand for medium and heavy-
duty trucks.

Net revenue in the Aerospace & Defense segment decreased $22.4 million in 2004 primarily due to lower
revenue from manufacturing services. Manufacturing services decreased $9.9 million primarily due to reduced
program funding for federal government agencies, delayed shipments and contracts completed during 2003. Other
outsourced services revenue and product sales decreased $0.7 million and $11.8 million in 2004 respectively. The
decrease in product sales is primarily due to reduced government funding for our customer’s programs.

Net revenue in the Test & Measurement segment increased $6.7 million in 2004 primarily due to a
$6.3 million increase in technical sales. The increase in revenue from technical services is primarily due to a large
contract with a prime government contractor for testing services performed during 2004, growth from calibration
services provided under certain customer accounts in 2004 and the full-year impact of two calibration operations
acquired during the second half of 2003.

Gross Profit.

The Industrial Group’s gross profit increased $15.3 million in 2004 primarily due to the
revenue growth from new contracts. Gross profit contributed by the new contracts was partially offset by
manufacturing inefficiencies associated with disruptions in raw material and key components and capacity
limitations associated with the increased demand. The disruptions to production schedules related to the timely and
dependable receipt of steel and components were present throughout 2004; however, during the fourth quarter the
Industrial Group’s gross margin declined to 4.9% and resulted in full year gross margin of 9.6% as compared to
10.1% in 2003. The factors impacting gross profit in the fourth quarter included excessive overtime to meet
fluctuating customer demand, loss of days worked to conduct three physical inventories, cost overruns on a variety
of new manufacturing cells, higher than expected training costs on new programs and increased charges to reflect
the growing nature and complexity of the business. Labor and absorption variances of approximately $1.5 million
related to manufacturing inefficiencies were recognized and excess supply, tooling and freight costs totaling
approximately $0.9 million were incurred in the fourth quarter. Also, an inventory adjustment of $1.1 million was
recorded in the fourth quarter primarily due to production scrap.

Our Aerospace & Defense segment’s gross profit decreased $9.6 million in 2004 primarily due to lower
margins associated with the decrease in product revenue. Product revenue declined 38% for the year which resulted
in a corresponding decrease in gross profit of $7.3 million. The decline is primarily volume related, although
competitive pricing pressure also began to impact profit margins during the second half of 2004. Manufacturing and
other outsourced services gross profit decreased $2.3 million or 15% in 2004, primarily due to a revenue decrease of
10% and an inventory write-off of $0.7 million in the fourth quarter related to a terminated contract. Gross margin
for the Aerospace and Defense segment was 16.2% in 2004 as compared to 20.4% in 2003. The decrease in gross
margin resulted primarily from the lower volume and related margins for product sales and the lower volume for
manufacturing services.

The Test & Measurement segment’s gross profit increased $1.8 million in 2004 primarily due to the
increase in technical services revenue. Gross margin for the Test & Measurement segment was 20.0% in 2004 as
compared to 18.9% in 2003. The increase in gross margin resulted primarily from the higher volumes for testing
and calibration services and lower costs for products achieved through outsourcing certain product subassemblies.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $8.5 million
in 2004 and decreased as a percentage of net revenue to 8.3% from 9.6% in 2003. The Industrial Group’s selling,
general and administrative expense accounted for $5.4 million of the increase, primarily due to higher administrative
costs related to additional infrastructure to support the new contracts in the Industrial Group and the overall growth
of the business. The Test & Measurement segment also increased selling expense to support the national account
opportunities for its calibration services.

Research and Development. Research and development costs decreased $0.5 million in 2004 due to the
completion of the first release of Silver Phoenix, a new data system product line within our Aerospace and Defense

segment. The majority of research and development costs during 2004 were related to future releases of this
product.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets increased in 2004 primarily due to

certain identifiable intangible assets acquired in connection with the new Industrial Group contracts.

Interest Expense, Net.

Interest expense increased in 2004 due to an increase in our weighted average debt
outstanding partially offset by a decrease in our weighted average interest rate. Our weighted average debt
outstanding increased to $51.5 million during 2004 from $31.1 million during 2003. The increase in debt is
primarily related to the Industrial Group’s acquisitions, working capital for the acquired operations, and capital
expenditures to increase capacity and automation. The weighted average interest rate decreased to 4.8% in 2004
from 5.4% in 2003. Our interest rate decreased effective with the July 2003 expiration of interest rate swap
agreements with higher than market interest rates. Our effective interest rate is expected to increase in 2005 due to
the issuance of senior notes totaling $55.0 million in June and August 2004 at a weighted average fixed interest rate
of 5.4% and expected increased market rates under our credit agreement.

Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 30.5% in 2004 as compared to 37.5% for 2003. An
examination by the Internal Revenue Service of our federal income tax returns for certain prior years was completed
during the third quarter of 2004 and a favorable adjustment of $0.4 million to income tax expense was recorded as
the additional tax assessment was less than the estimated liability previously recorded. Additionally, our effective
tax rate on foreign operation in 2004 was approximately 29%, which reflects the lower statutory rate for Mexico.

Quarterly Results

The following table presents our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income data for each of
the eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005. We have prepared this data on the same basis as
our audited consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, have included all normal recurring adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of this information. You should read these unaudited quarterly results in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report.
The consolidated results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
any subsequent period.

First

Second

Third

Fourth

First

2005

2004 Restated (1)
Third

Second

Fourth

(in thousands, except per share data)

Net revenue:

Industrial Group ..................... $ 88,690 $ 89,673 $ 94,504 $ 86,735 $ 48,451 $ 58,222 $ 78,429 $ 75,308

Aerospace & Defense...........
Test & Measurement ............

Electronics Group...................

23,996
11,555

35,551

24,095
11,834

35,929

33,866
12,441

46,307

33,906
11,471

45,377

Total net revenue ....................

124,241

125,602

140,811

132,112

Cost of sales:

Industrial Group .....................

Aerospace & Defense...........
Test & Measurement ............

Electronics Group...................

82,293

21,605
8,984

30,589

82,132

20,726
8,856

29,582

87,161

28,498
9,546

38,044

85,100

27,538
8,989

36,527

Total cost of sales ...................

112,882

111,714

125,205

121,627

Gross profit:

Industrial Group .....................

Aerospace & Defense...........
Test & Measurement ............

Electronics Group...................
Total gross profit ....................

Selling, general and

administrative.......................
Research and development .......
Amortization of

intangible assets ...................

Operating income (loss)............

6,397

2,391
2,571

4,962
11,359

8,553
673

138

1,995

7,541

3,369
2,978

6,347
13,888

9,113
944

175

3,656

Interest expense, net .................
Other (income) expense, net .....

1,261
(181)

1,508
(586)

7,343

5,368
2,895

8,263
15,606

8,492
767

161

6,186

1,797

(89)

1,635

6,368
2,482

8,850
10,485

9,511
449

140

385

29,572
11,353

40,925

89,376

41,994

24,110
8,914

33,024

75,018

6,457

5,462
2,439

7,901
14,358

8,158
524

126

5,550

25,793
11,881

37,674

28,350
11,678

40,028

35,464
10,901

46,365

95,896

118,457

121,673

52,686

21,002
9,212

30,214

69,082

23,899
9,302

33,201

71,644

30,884
9,234

40,118

82,900

102,283

111,762

5,536

4,791
2,669

7,460
12,996

8,628
875

140

3,353

9,347

4,451
2,376

6,827
16,174

8,915
1,084

145

6,030

646
15

5,369

1,578

3,664

4,580
1,667

6,247
9,911

9,547
1,214

185

(1,035)

939
(47)

(1,927)

(1,126)

1,413
(469)

288
(58)

227
(48)

Income (loss) before income

taxes .....................................

Income tax expense (benefit)....

915

325

2,734

753

4,478

1,477

(559)

(308)

5,320

1,995

3,174

1,190

Net income (loss)...................... $

590 $

1,981 $

3,001 $

(251) $

3,325 $

1,984 $

3,791 $

(801)

Earnings (loss) per common

Basic..................................... $
Diluted ................................. $

0.03 $
0.03 $

0.11 $
0.11 $

0.17 $
0.16 $

(0.01) $
(0.01) $

0.22 $
0.21 $

0.11 $
0.11 $

0.21 $
0.21 $

(0.04)
(0.04)

Shares used in computing

earnings (loss) per common
share:

Basic.....................................
Diluted .................................

17,964
18,296

18,028
18,261

18,036
18,423

18,037
18,037

14,791
15,593

17,827
18,552

17,889
18,306

17,916
17,916

(1) On January 1, 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for inventory and cost of sales at one manufacturing facility. The change

(decreased) increased previously reported earnings for the 2004 first, second, third and fourth quarter by $(74), zero, $304 and $662, or
$(0.01), zero, $0.02, and $0.04 per diluted share, respectively.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition

Net cash provided by operating activities was $72.6 million in 2005 as compared to net cash used in
operating activities of $27.4 million in 2004. The cash provided by operating activities in 2005 includes a net
decrease in working capital investment primarily due to an increase in accounts payable of $15.1 million and a
decrease in inventories and accounts receivable of $11.6 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The reduction in
working capital in 2005 was primarily driven by the implementation of a weekly working capital management
framework in the second half of 2005. The use of cash in operating activities in 2004 was primarily due to a net
increase in working capital investment related to our new ArvinMeritor and Dana contracts that started in May and
June of 2004, respectively.

Net cash used in investing activities was $36.2 million in 2005 as compared to $86.1 million in 2004.
Capital expenditures decreased to $36.3 million in 2005 from $55.9 million in 2004. Capital expenditures in 2005
for our Industrial Group were $28.4 million principally comprised of forging, machining, and centralized tooling
equipment, while capital expenditures for our Aerospace & Defense and Test & Measurement segments were
$2.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively, principally comprised of manufacturing, assembly and test equipment.
Capital expenditures in 2004 for the Industrial Group were $42.6 million with an additional $29.6 million invested
in 2004 for the acquisition of net assets related to the new contracts with Dana and ArvinMeritor. Capital
expenditures in 2004 for our Aerospace & Defense and Test & Measurement segments were $8.4 million and
$4.6 million, respectively. The reduction of capital expenditures in the Industrial Group for 2005 is the result of our
expected gradual return to normal levels of capital expenditures, after our initial investments in new plants, forging
technology and automation. Capital expenditures decreased in 2005 for the Aerospace & Defense segment as
several programs neared completion and new programs required less new capital investment than in prior years.

Net cash used in financing activities was $38.3 million in 2005 as compared to net cash provided by
financing activities of $115.6 million in 2004. In 2005, we made net repayments totaling $37.0 million on our
revolving credit facility as a result of significantly improved cash flow from operations. In 2004, we received net
proceeds of $55.3 million from our public stock offering of 3,450,000 shares of common stock that closed in March
and April 2004. We also issued senior notes for a total of $55.0 million in June and August 2004 through private
placement transitions. Proceeds from the offering were principally used to reduce debt on our revolving credit
facility.

We had total availability for borrowings and letters of credit under the revolving credit facility of
$100.0 million at December 31, 2005. Maximum borrowings on the revolving credit facility are $125.0 million,
subject to a $15.0 million limit for letters of credit. On February 14, 2006, the Company exercised its option to
voluntarily reduce the aggregate commitment to $100,000,000. The voluntary election reduced the total availability
for borrowings and letters of credit under the revolving credit facility to $75.0 million, which when combined with
our unrestricted cash balance of $12.1 million, provides for total cash and borrowing capacity of $87.1 million. The
credit agreement includes an option to increase the amount of available credit to $125.0 million, subject to the lead
bank’s approval. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be used to finance working capital
requirements, acquisitions and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures. Most acquisitions
require the approval of our bank group. Our credit agreement was amended in March 2006 to revise certain financial
covenants, while our senior notes were amended in August 2005 to revise certain financial covenants. Other terms
of the credit agreement and senior notes remained substantially unchanged.

On March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date), our largest customer, Dana, and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York. Dana's European, South American, Asia- Pacific, Canadian and Mexican
subsidiaries (Dana Mexico) were excluded from the Chapter 11 filing and are operating as normal. As of the Filing
Date, we had been paid for substantially all outstanding Dana accounts receivable recorded in the balance sheet at
December 31, 2005. Accounts receivable from domestic Dana subsidiaries at the Filing Date could be subject to
compromise, right of offset or set aside as a protected payment under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing. For example,
recently amended bankruptcy law generally permits accounts payable to be offset against accounts receivable and
offers protection for the last 20 calendar days of shipments as an administrative priority expense in the bankruptcy.
As of the Filing Date and excluding certain gain contingencies, we estimated amounts due from Dana to
approximate $28.6 million including up to an estimated $13.0 million due from Dana Mexico, in addition to

potential offsets from accounts payable and other protected claims of $12.0 million, although right of offset and
protected claims have not been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. We continue to pursue additional offsets to
further reduce our net receivable position. Under the Chapter 11 proceedings, right of offset may not be granted,
certain payments made by Dana to the Company in the 90 days preceding Dana’s Chapter 11 filing could be subject
to return as a “preference ”, or our shipments may not be protected, which would increase our net receivable
position. As a consequence of Dana’s Chapter 11 filing, the timing of payments from Dana will increase our net debt
and working capital levels. Accounts receivable and payable from Dana Mexico are not currently subject to
compromise under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing and continue to be received and paid in normal course.

Our principal commitments at December 31, 2005 consisted of repayments of borrowings under the credit
agreement and senior notes, pension obligations and obligations under operating leases for certain of our real
property and equipment. Estimated pension contributions for 2006 are expected to range from $0.9 million to $1.3
million. We also had purchase commitments totaling approximately $31.2 million at December 31, 2005, primarily
for inventory and manufacturing equipment. The following table provides information about the payment dates of our
debt and contractual lease obligations at December 31, 2005, excluding current liabilities except for the current portion
of long-term debt (amounts in thousands):

2006

Revolving credit facility ............. $ —
Senior notes ...............................
—
7,597
Operating leases.........................
Total .......................................... $ 7,597

2007
$ —
—
6,178
$ 6,178

2008
$ 25,000
—
5,091
$ 30,091

2009
$ —
7,500
3,771
$ 11,271

2010
$ —
—
1,228
$ 1,228

2011 &
Thereafter
$ —
47,500
3,343
$ 50,843

At December 31, 2005 we also had approximately $3.9 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards
available to offset future federal taxable income. Such carryforwards will increase future cash flows, if utilized, and
reflect income tax losses incurred which will expire on December 31, 2024.

We believe that sufficient resources will be available to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next
twelve months. Cash requirements for periods beyond the next twelve months depend on our profitability, our
ability to manage working capital requirements and our rate of growth. If we make significant acquisitions, if our
largest customers experience financial difficulty, or if working capital and capital expenditure requirements exceed
expected levels during the next twelve months or in subsequent periods, we may require additional external sources
of capital. There can be no assurance that any additional required financing will be available through bank
borrowings, debt or equity financings or otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be available on terms
acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our business, consolidated results of
operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”)
No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.”
Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. SFAS No.
123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an option. The
provisions of Statement No. 123(R) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we historically accounted for stock option grants in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and, as the
strike price of options issued was equal to grant date fair value, we did not recognize compensation cost for
employee stock option issuances. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective
method. Excluding restricted stock issued in 2005, the impact of adoption of SFAS 123(R) is expected to result in an
additional non cash compensation expense in fiscal 2006 for options granted through December 31, 2005 of $0.3
million, net of tax, plus an undetermined amount for options yet to be granted. Had the Company adopted SFAS No.

123(R) in prior periods, the impact would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 pro forma footnote
disclosure, excluding the impact of the “underwater” option accelerations which occurred in 2005.

On March 1, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 28, 2005, the Board of Directors approved resolutions to
accelerate the vesting for “underwater” options as of March 11, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 30, 2005,
respectively in order to reduce future compensation expense related to outstanding options. After amendment of
each underlying option agreement, compensation expense to be recognized in the income statement, subsequent to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was reduced by approximately $1.6 million, net of tax.

SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to
be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This
requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
While the Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other
things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of operating cash flows recognized for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $0.2 million, $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and
handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) are required to be recognized as current period charges. The
provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 151 on January 1, 2006. The impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of
operations was not material.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates. All additional borrowings under our credit agreement bear interest at a variable rate based on the prime rate,
the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), or certain alternative short-term rates, plus a margin (1.75 % at
December 31, 2005) based upon our leverage ratio. An increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in
additional interest expense approximating $0.3 million on an annualized basis, based upon our debt outstanding at
December 31, 2005. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have historically impacted our earnings only to
the extent of remeasurement gains related to U.S. Dollar denominated accounts of our foreign subsidiary, because
the vast majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. A one percent change in foreign currency
exchange rates would result in remeasurement gain or loss of approximately $0.3 million on an annualized basis,
based upon the U.S. Dollar denominated accounts of our foreign subsidiary at December 31, 2005. A change in
fixed interest rates of 100 basis points would change the fair value of our Senior Notes by $2.8 million. Inflation has
not been a significant factor in our operations in any of the periods presented; however, there can be no assurances
that the growth in our Industrial Group’s business combined with significant increases in the costs of steel will not
adversely affect our working capital requirements and our associated interest costs, which could also increase the
sensitivity of our results to changes in interest rates.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.................................................................. 36

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting........... 37

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ................................................................................ 38

Consolidated Income Statements ....................................................................................................................... 39

Consolidated Balance Sheets ............................................................................................................................. 40

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows............................................................................................................. 41

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity .............................................................................................. 42

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................................................................................................... 43

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Sypris Solutions, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal
control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Sypris management and its Board of Directors
regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published consolidated financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to the accuracy of
consolidated financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of Sypris Solutions, Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making our assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, we concluded that as of December 31, 2005, Sypris’ internal control over financial reporting is effective
based on these criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditors and a registered public accounting firm, has issued an

attestation report on our assessment of Sypris Solutions, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sypris Solutions, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Sypris Solutions, Inc. maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). Sypris Solutions, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s
assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Sypris Solutions, Inc. maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO
criteria. Also, in our opinion, Sypris Solutions, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the 2005 consolidated financial statements of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and our report dated
February 17, 2006, except for Note 20 as to which the date is March 3, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
February 17, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sypris Solutions, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sypris Solutions, Inc. (the Company) as
of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule
based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Sypris Solutions, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Sypris Solutions, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2006
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
February 17, 2006, except for Note 20 as to

which the date is March 3, 2006

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except for per share data)

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

Net revenue:

Outsourced services .......................................................................... $ 488,356
34,410
Products ...........................................................................................

$ 389,717
35,685

$ 230,632
45,973

Total net revenue...........................................................................

522,766

425,402

276,605

Cost of sales:

Outsourced services ..........................................................................
Products ...........................................................................................

449,794
21,634

348,472
23,491

203,147
27,513

Total cost of sales..........................................................................

471,428

371,963

230,660

Gross profit ...................................................................................

51,338

Selling, general and administrative .......................................................
Research and development ...................................................................
Amortization of intangible assets..........................................................

35,669
2,833
614

Operating income ..........................................................................

12,222

Interest expense, net .............................................................................
Other (income) expense, net .................................................................

Income before income taxes ..........................................................

Income tax expense ..............................................................................

5,979
(1,325)

7,568

2,247

53,439

35,248
3,697
596

13,898

2,100
(138)

11,936

3,637

45,945

26,711
4,166
194

14,874

1,693
230

12,951

4,860

Net income.................................................................................... $

5,321

8,299

8,091

Earnings per common share:

Basic............................................................................................. $
Diluted.......................................................................................... $

0.30
0.29

$
$

0.48
0.47

$
$

0.57
0.56

Shares used in computing earnings per common share:

Basic.............................................................................................
Diluted..........................................................................................

18,016
18,323

17,119
17,745

14,237
14,653

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for share data)

December 31,

2004
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents......................................................................................... $ 12,060
95,432
Accounts receivable, net ...........................................................................................
79,724
Inventory, net ...........................................................................................................
26,020
Other current assets ..................................................................................................

$ 14,060
104,637
92,016
21,566

Total current assets................................................................................................

213,236

232,279

Property, plant and equipment, net................................................................................

176,719

166,940

Goodwill......................................................................................................................

Other assets..................................................................................................................

14,277

13,392

14,277

17,682

Total assets ........................................................................................................... $ 417,624

$ 431,178

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable...................................................................................................... $ 76,567
24,904
Accrued liabilities.....................................................................................................
—
Current portion of long-term debt..............................................................................

$ 61,778
20,378
7,000

Total current liabilities...........................................................................................

101,471

89,156

Long-term debt ............................................................................................................

80,000

110,000

Other liabilities ............................................................................................................

22,419

23,083

Total liabilities ......................................................................................................

203,890

222,239

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 975,150 shares authorized; no shares

issued....................................................................................................................

Series A preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 24,850 shares authorized; no

shares issued .........................................................................................................

Common stock, non-voting, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares

authorized; no shares issued...................................................................................

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;

18,165,658 and 17,920,500 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004,
respectively...........................................................................................................
Additional paid-in capital..........................................................................................
Retained earnings .....................................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .....................................................................
Unearned compensation............................................................................................

—

182
143,350
73,375
(1,934)
(1,239)

179
140,898
70,227
(2,365)
—

Total stockholders’ equity......................................................................................

213,734

208,939

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity................................................................ $ 417,624

$ 431,178

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

5,321

8,299

8,091

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income ....................................................................................... $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization .......................................................
Deferred income taxes ...................................................................
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory ...................................
Provision for doubtful accounts .....................................................
Noncash compensation expense.....................................................
Other noncash charges...................................................................
Contributions to pension plans.......................................................
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable.....................................................................
Inventory.....................................................................................
Other current assets .....................................................................
Accounts payable.........................................................................
Accrued and other liabilities.........................................................

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities .....................

25,909
(1,091)
739
607
219
123
(79)

8,595
11,555
3,363
15,119
2,208

72,588

Cash flows from investing activities:

Capital expenditures .........................................................................
Proceeds from sale of assets ..............................................................
Purchase of net assets of acquired entities..........................................
Changes in nonoperating assets and liabilities....................................

(36,264)
649
—
(625)

19,066
3,692
1,520
1,842
—
252
(929)

(60,995)
(27,004)
(9,971)
33,947
2,871

(27,410)

(55,900)
47
(29,648)
(640)

12,831
6,009
832
191
—
846
(586)

(7,724)
7,971
(4,112)
3,154
(228)

27,275

(22,521)
175
(23,300)
(171)

Net cash used in investing activities ...........................................

(36,240)

(86,141)

(45,817)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net (decrease) increase in debt under revolving credit agreements .....
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes..............................................
Cash dividends paid..........................................................................
Proceeds from issuance of common stock..........................................

(37,000)
—
(2,164)
816

5,800
55,000
(2,023)
56,815

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities .....................

(38,348)

115,592

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents.............................

(2,000)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.....................................

14,060

2,041

12,019

19,200
—
(1,709)
667

18,158

(384)

12,403

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year............................................... $ 12,060

$ 14,060

$ 12,019

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except for share data)

Common Stock

Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)

Unearned

Compensation

Restated January 1, 2003 balance (Note 2) ......

14,158,077 $

142 $

82,575 $ 57,672

$ (2,699) $

Restated net income (Note 2) ..........................
Adjustment in minimum pension liability, net
of tax of $2.................................................

Change in fair value of interest rate swap

agreements, net of tax of $210.....................
Restated comprehensive income......................

Cash dividends, $0.12 per common share ........
Issuance of shares under Employee Stock

Purchase Plan .............................................
Exercise of stock options ................................
Stock option tax benefit ..................................

—

—
—

—

38,160
87,086
—

—

—
—

—

—
1
—

—

8,091

—

—
—

—

—
8,091

—

(1,709)

353
456
157

—
—
—

—

349
353

—

—
—
—

Restated December 31, 2003 balance (Note 2).

14,283,323

143

83,541 64,054

(2,346)

Restated net income (Note 2) ..........................
Adjustment in minimum pension liability, net
of tax of $405 .............................................
Foreign currency translation gain ....................
Restated comprehensive income (loss) (Note 2)

—

—
—
—

Cash dividends, $0.12 per common share ........
Issuance of common shares.............................
Issuance of shares under Employee Stock

Purchase Plan .............................................
Exercise of stock options ................................
Stock option tax benefit ..................................

—
3,450,000

48,537
138,640
—

—

—
—
—

—
35

—
1
—

—

8,299

—
—
—

—
—
8,299

—
55,220

(2,126)
—

499
1,086
552

—
—
—

—

(637)
618
(19)

—
—

—
—
—

Restated December 31, 2004 balance (Note 2).

17,920,500

179

140,898 70,227

(2,365)

Net income.....................................................
Adjustment in minimum pension liability,

net of tax of $132........................................
Foreign currency translation gain ....................
Comprehensive income...................................

Cash dividends, $0.12 per common share .......
Issuance of restricted common stock ...............
Noncash compensation ...................................
Issuance of shares under Employee Stock

Purchase Plan .............................................
Exercise of stock options ................................
Stock option tax benefit ..................................

—

—
—
—

—
127,500
—

36,177
81,481
—

—

—
—
—

—
2
—

—
1
—

—

5,321

—
—
—

—
—
5,321

—
1,394
62

(2,173)
—
—

350
465
181

—
—
—

—

(208)
639
431

—
—
—

—

—
—

—

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—
(1,396)
157

—
—
—

Balance at December 31, 2005........................

18,165,658 $

182 $ 143,350 $ 73,375

$ (1,934) $

(1,239)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)

Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation Policy

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Sypris” or the “Company”) and have been prepared by the Company in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s operations
are domiciled in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico and serve a wide variety of domestic and international
customers. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Nature of Business

Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The Company performs a
wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design, testing, and other technical services, typically under multi-year,
sole-source contracts with corporations and government agencies in the markets for truck components & assemblies,
aerospace & defense electronics, and test & measurement services. The Company provides such services through its
Industrial and Electronics Groups (Note 18).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Specifically, due to the size and nature of the Company’s
aerospace and defense related programs, the estimation of total contract related revenues and cost at completion is
subject to a wide range of variables. As contracts may require performance over several accounting periods, formal
detailed cost-to-complete estimates are performed and updated monthly. Management’s estimates of costs-to-complete
change due to internal and external factors, such as labor rate and efficiency variances, revised estimates of warranty
costs, estimated future material prices and customer specification and testing requirement changes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when

purchased.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Costs for raw materials, work in
process and finished goods, excluding contract inventory included in the Electronics Group, is determined under the
first-in, first-out method (see Note 2). Indirect inventories, which include perishable tooling, repair parts and other
materials consumed in the manufacturing process but not incorporated into finished products are classified as raw
materials.

Costs on long-term contracts and programs in progress represent recoverable costs incurred for production
or contract-specific materials and equipment, allocable operating overhead, advances to suppliers and where
appropriate, pre-contract engineering and design expenses. Pursuant to contract provisions, agencies of the U.S.
Government and certain other customers have title to, or a security interest in, inventories related to such contracts
as a result of advances, performance based payments and progress payments. Such advances and payments are
reflected as an offset against the related inventory balances. General administrative expenses related to commercial
products and services provided essentially under commercial terms and conditions are expensed as incurred.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The Company’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory is primarily based upon forecasted demand for
its product sales, and any change to the reserve arising from forecast revisions is reflected in cost of sales in the
period the revision is made.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
is generally computed using the straight-line method over their estimated economic lives. For land improvements,
buildings and building improvements, the estimated economic life is generally 40 years. Estimated economic lives
range from three to fifteen years for machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of their economic life or the respective lease term using the straight-line method.
Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are expensed as incurred. Major rebuilds and
improvements are capitalized.

Interest cost is capitalized for qualifying assets during the period in which the asset is being installed and

prepared for its intended use. Capitalized interest cost is amortized on the same basis as the related depreciation.

Long-lived Assets

When indicators of impairment exist, the Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment and assesses
their recoverability based upon anticipated undiscounted future cash flows. If facts and circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of an asset or groups of assets, as applicable, is impaired, the long-lived asset or groups of long-
lived assets are written down to their estimated fair value.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment by calculating the estimated fair value of each business
with which goodwill is associated. The estimated fair value is determined based on a discounted cash flow basis,
which is compared to the carrying value of each applicable business. The Company tested goodwill of $14,277,000
for impairment as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, determining that no impairment loss was necessary. As of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the carrying value of goodwill for the Industrial Group, Aerospace & Defense and the
Test & Measurement segments was $440,000, $6,900,000 and $6,937,000, respectively.

Net Revenue and Cost of Sales

Net revenue of products and services provided essentially under commercial terms and conditions are
recorded upon delivery and passage of title, or when services are rendered. Related shipping and handling costs, if
any, are included in costs of sales. Net revenue under service-type contracts is recorded as costs are incurred.
Applicable estimated profits are included in earnings in the proportion that incurred costs bear to total estimated
costs.

Net revenue under long-term, fixed-price contracts with aerospace & defense companies and agencies of the
U.S. Government is recognized using the percentage of completion method, primarily using units-of-delivery as the
basis to measure progress toward completing the contract and recognizing revenue. Estimated contract profits are
taken into earnings in proportion to recorded sales. Sales under certain long-term fixed-price contracts that
specifically provide for milestones are recorded as revenue upon achievement of performance milestones, limited to
revenue recognized using the cost-to-cost method of accounting where sales and profits are recorded based on the
ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Amounts representing contract change orders or claims
are included in revenue when such costs are reliably estimated and realization is probable. When adjustments in
contract value or estimated costs are determined, any changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the
current period. Anticipated losses on contracts are charged to earnings when determined to be probable.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

Revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting totaled approximately
$94,419,000, $90,018,000 and $111,341,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In
2005, 2004 and 2003, approximately 91%, 85% and 88%, respectively, of such amount was accounted for based on
units of delivery and approximately 9%, 15% and 12%, respectively, was accounted for based on milestones or cost-to-
cost.

Product Warranty Costs

The provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect
actual experience. The accrued liability for warranty costs is included in the caption “Accrued liabilities” in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of
accounts receivable. The Company’s customer base consists of a number of customers in diverse industries across
geographic areas, primarily in North America and Mexico, various departments or agencies of the U.S. Government,
and aerospace & defense companies under contract with the U.S. Government. The Company performs periodic
credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and does not require collateral on its commercial accounts
receivable. Credit losses are provided for in the consolidated financial statements and consistently have been within
management’s expectations. Approximately 72% and 73% of accounts receivable outstanding at December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively are due from the Company’s four largest customers. More specifically, Dana Corporation
(“Dana”) and ArvinMeritor, Inc. (“Arvin Meritor”) comprise 34% and 27%, respectively of December 31, 2005
outstanding accounts receivables. Similar amounts at December 31, 2004 were 43% and 19%, respectively.

The Industrial Group’s largest customers for the year ended December 31, 2005 were Dana and
ArvinMeritor, which represented approximately 39% and 15%, respectively, of the Company’s total net revenue.
Dana and ArvinMeritor were also the Company’s largest customers for the year ended December 31, 2004 which
represented approximately 36% and 15%, respectively, of the Company’s total net revenue. Dana and Raytheon
Company were the Company’s largest customers for the year ended December 31, 2003, which represented
approximately 15% and 14%, respectively, of the Company’s total net revenue. The Company recognized revenue
from contracts with the U.S. Government and its agencies approximating 9%, 9% and 18% of net revenue for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Raytheon and U.S. Government agencies are
customers of the Aerospace & Defense and Test & Measurement reportable segments. No other single customer
accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 or
2003.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency for the Company’s Mexican subsidiary is the Mexican peso. Assets and liabilities
are translated at period end exchange rate, and income and expense items are translated at the period end weighted
average exchange rate. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in comprehensive income (loss) as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity. Remeasurement gains or losses for U.S. dollar denominated accounts of
the Company’s Mexican subsidiary are included in other income, net.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock options are granted under various stock compensation programs to employees and independent
directors (see Note 14). On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash
Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. SFAS

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an option. The
provisions of Statement No. 123(R) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company historically accounted for stock option grants in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and, as
the strike price of options issued was equal to grant date fair value, the Company did not recognize compensation
cost for employee stock option issuances. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the
modified prospective method. Excluding restricted stock issued in 2005 (Note 14), the impact of adoption of SFAS
123(R) is expected to result in an additional non cash compensation expense in fiscal 2006 for equity awards granted
through December 31, 2005 of approximately $238,000, net of tax plus an undetermined amount for options yet to
be granted. Had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact would have approximated the
impact of SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosure, excluding the impact of the “underwater” option accelerations which
occurred in 2005.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over

the options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information is as follows:

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
2005
(Note 2)
(in thousands, except for per share data)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

Net income............................................................... $

5,321

8,299

8,091

Pro forma stock-based compensation
expense, net of tax ..................................................

Pro forma net income ............................................... $

2,597

2,724

Pro forma earnings per common share:

Basic ................................................................. $
Diluted .............................................................. $

0.15
0.15

1,277

7,022

0.41
0.40

1,624

6,467

0.45
0.44

$
$

On March 1, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 28, 2005, the Board of Directors approved resolutions to
accelerate the vesting for “underwater” options as of March 11, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 30, 2005,
respectively in order to reduce future compensation expense related to outstanding options. Substantially all other
options terms remained unchanged. After amendment of each underlying option agreement, compensation expense
to be recognized in the income statement, subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was reduced by
approximately $1,573,000, net of tax.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements, which were deemed to be effective hedges
in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (see Note 10). All
changes in the fair value, net of income tax, were recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated
statements of stockholders’ equity. All such interest rate swap agreements expired in July 2003.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

Collective Bargaining Agreements

Approximately 1,489 or 50% of the Company’s employees, all of which are in the Industrial Group, are
covered by collective bargaining agreements. Employees covered by collective bargaining agreements expiring in
one year approximate 225 or 8% of the Company’s workforce.

Adoption of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s 2004 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the 2005 presentation. For example, the Company reclassified deferred contract costs approximating
$4,460,000 from inventory to other assets at December 31, 2004.

(2)

Change in Method of Accounting

During the first quarter of 2005, the Company’s Industrial Group changed its method of accounting for
certain inventory and cost of sales at its Louisville manufacturing facility to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method
from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method used in all prior years. As a result, all inventories are now stated at the
lower of cost, determined on a FIFO basis, or market. Prior to this voluntary change in accounting principle,
approximately 13% of the Company’s total inventory as previously reported was valued using LIFO and the
remaining inventories were valued using FIFO.

The change is preferable because it results in conforming all of the Company’s inventories to a uniform
method of accounting subsequent to a series of acquisitions from 2001 through 2004. In addition, inventories will be
valued in a manner which more closely approximates current cost, and FIFO is the prevalent method used by other
entities within the Company’s industry and provides a more meaningful and understandable presentation of financial
position to users of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, the consolidated
financial statements for all prior periods have been adjusted to retroactively apply this change in accounting
principle. The effect of the accounting change on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share as
previously reported by quarter for 2004 is:

Year ended December 31, 2004

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Total

(in thousands, except per share data)

Net income (loss):

Previously reported .............................. $ 3,399
(74)
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $ 3,325

$ 1,984
—
$ 1,984

$ 3,487
304
$ 3,791

$ (1,463)
662
(801)

$ 7,407
892
$ 8,299

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

Previously reported .............................. $
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $

0.23
(0.01)
0.22

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

Previously reported .............................. $
Increase (decrease)...............................
Restated ............................................... $

0.22
(0.01)
0.21

0.11
—
0.11

0.19
0.02
0.21

(0.08)
0.04
(0.04)

0.43
0.05
0.48

0.42
0.05
0.47

The effect of the accounting change on net income and earnings per common share as previously reported

for the year ended December 31, 2003 (in thousands, except per share data) is:

Net income:

8,135
(44)
8,091

Basic earnings per common share:

Diluted earnings per common share:

0.57
—
0.57

0.56
—
0.56

The retroactive restatement of the change in accounting method increases previously reported inventory,
retained earnings and noncurrent deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2004 by $2,224,000, $1,503,000 and
$721,000, respectively. The restatement had no impact on operating cash flow.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(3)

Acquisitions

On June 30, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of a plant located in Toluca, Mexico
from Dana that expanded the Company’s manufacturing capabilities in steer axles, drive axle shafts and various
drive train components. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase, in which the purchase price of
$16,486,000 was initially allocated based on the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired. The purchase price
includes approximately $900,000 paid to Dana in 2005 related to a post-closing adjustment to Dana’s net book value
of the acquired assets. The results of operations of the acquired business were included in the consolidated financial
statements beginning July 1, 2004. Following are the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of the acquisition (in thousands):

Current assets ........................................................................................................... $
Property, plant and equipment...................................................................................
Supply agreements....................................................................................................

Total assets acquired.................................................................................................
Current liabilities assumed........................................................................................

2,385
14,462
500

17,347
(861)

Net assets acquired ................................................................................................... $ 16,486

On May 3, 2004, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of a plant located in Kenton, Ohio
from ArvinMeritor that expanded the Company’s manufacturing capabilities in trailer axle beams and various drive
train components. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase, in which the purchase price of $14,062,000 was
initially allocated based on the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired. The results of operations of the
acquired business were included in the consolidated financial statements beginning May 4, 2004. Following are the
estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition (in thousands):

3,012
11,103
800

14,915
(853)

Net assets acquired ................................................................................................... $ 14,062

The estimated fair value of the supply agreements in the above acquisition are accounted for as finite-lived
intangible assets that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over eight and nine year periods in accordance with
the terms of the respective agreements. Additionally, the acquisition above was financed by the Company’s Credit
Agreement (see Note 10).

Subsequent to the closure of each acquisition, the Company performed an evaluation of the acquisition
proforma disclosure requirements and determined that proforma information was not required as the acquisitions
were not material, individually or in the aggregate, as applicable.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(4)

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Commercial...................................................................................... $ 89,342
7,988
U.S. Government..............................................................................

$ 98,608
7,726

Allowance for doubtful accounts.......................................................

97,330
(1,898)

106,334
(1,697)

$ 95,432

$ 104,637

Accounts receivable from the U.S. Government includes amounts due under long-term contracts, all of

which are billed at December 31, 2005 and 2004, of $7,118,000 and $5,690,000 respectively.

(5)

Inventory

Inventory consists of the following:

December 31,

2004
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

(in thousands)

Raw materials, including perishable tooling of $2,301 and $2,625
in 2005 and 2004, respectively ........................................................ $ 35,440
16,275
Work in process................................................................................
14,525
Finished goods .................................................................................
Costs relating to long-term contracts and programs, net of amounts
attributed to revenue recognized to date...........................................
Progress payments related to long-term contracts and programs.........
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory.........................................

34,690
(14,864)
(6,342)

$ 36,224
18,166
5,956

39,115
(1,543)
(5,902)

$ 79,724

$ 92,016

(6)

Other Current Assets

Other current assets consist of the following:

Deferred contract costs ..................................................................... $ 10,890
15,130
Other................................................................................................

—
21,566

$ 26,020

$ 21,566

Included in other current assets are pre-paid expenses, income taxes refundable, and other items, none of

which exceed 5% of total current assets.

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(7)

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Land and land improvements ............................................................ $
Buildings and building improvements ...............................................
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures ....................................
Construction in progress ...................................................................

5,448
37,194
244,606
9,633

5,330
35,261
200,009
25,932

296,881

266,532

Accumulated depreciation.................................................................

(120,162)

(99,592)

$ 176,719

$ 166,940

Depreciation expense totaled approximately $25,295,000, $18,470,000 and $12,637,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Approximately $488,000 and $818,000 was included in
accounts payable for capital expenditures at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

(8)

Other Assets

Other assets consist of the following:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Intangible assets:
Gross carrying value:

Industrial Group ........................................................................ $
Aerospace & Defense .............................................................
Test & Measurement ..............................................................

Electronics Group......................................................................

Total gross carrying value...................................................

Accumulated amortization:

Industrial Group ........................................................................
Aerospace & Defense .............................................................
Test & Measurement ..............................................................

Electronics Group......................................................................

Total accumulated amortization ..........................................

Intangible assets, net ...........................................................
Prepaid benefit cost ..........................................................................
Deferred contract costs .....................................................................
Other................................................................................................

3,407
795
720

1,515

4,922

(1,011)
(361)
(499)

(860)

(1,871)

3,051
5,181
—
5,160

3,407
795
720

1,515

4,922

(653)
(308)
(297)

(605)

(1,258)

3,664
4,871
4,460
4,687

$ 13,392

$ 17,682

Intangible assets consist primarily of long-term supply agreements in the Industrial Group and non-compete
and royalty agreements in both segments of the Electronics Group. The weighted average amortization period for
intangible assets was 8 years at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(9)

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Salaries, wages, employment taxes and withholdings ........................ $
Employee benefit plans.....................................................................
Income, property and other taxes.......................................................
Payments received in excess of contract costs ...................................
Other................................................................................................

2,305
5,243
4,599
7,000
5,757
$ 24,904

2,480
5,366
4,247
1,043
7,242
$ 20,378

Included in other accrued liabilities are accrued operating expenses, accrued warranty expenses, accrued

interest and other items, none of which exceed 5% of total current liabilities.

(10)

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Revolving credit facility ................................................................... $ 25,000
55,000
Senior notes......................................................................................

$ 62,000
55,000

Less current portion ..........................................................................

80,000
—

117,000
(7,000)

$ 80,000

$ 110,000

On June 10, 2004 and August 19, 2004, the Company issued a total of $55,000,000 of senior notes through
a private placement transaction (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes consist of $7,500,000 of notes due in 2009
bearing interest at 4.73%, $27,500,000 of notes due in 2011 bearing interest at 5.35% and a $20,000,000 note due in
2014 bearing interest at 5.78%.

The Company also has a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks (the “Credit Agreement”) that was
entered into in October 1999 and amended most recently in August 2005. The Credit Agreement provides for a
revolving credit facility with an aggregate commitment of $125,000,000 through October 2008. On February 14,
2006, the Company exercised its option to voluntarily reduce the aggregate commitment to $100,000,000. After the
voluntary reduction, the Company had total availability for borrowings and letters of credit under the revolving
credit facility of $75,000,000 at December 31, 2005, which, when combined with the unrestricted cash balance of
$12,060,000, provides for total cash and borrowing capacity of $87,060,000. The Credit Agreement includes an
option to increase the amount of available credit to $125,000,000, subject to the lead bank’s approval. Current
maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2004 represent amounts due under a short-term borrowing
arrangement included in the Credit Agreement. Standby letters of credit up to a maximum of $15,000,000 may be
issued under the Credit Agreement, and no significant amounts were outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, interest rates are determined at the time of borrowing and are
based on the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 1.0% to 2.0%; or the greater of the prime rate or the
federal funds rate plus 0.5%, plus a margin up to 0.75%. The Company also pays a fee of 0.20% to 0.25% on the
unused portion of the aggregate commitment. The margins applied to the respective interest rates and the

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

commitment fee are adjusted quarterly and are based on the Company’s ratio of funded debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

The Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement contain customary affirmative and negative covenants,
including financial covenants requiring the maintenance of specified fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios and
minimum levels of net worth. As of December 31, 2005 the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

The weighted average interest rate for outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2005 was 6.3%. The
weighted average interest rates for borrowings during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were
5.2%, 4.8% and 5.4% respectively. Interest incurred, net of amounts capitalized, during the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 totaled approximately $6,279,000, $2,584,000 and $1,729,000, respectively. Capitalized
interest for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 approximated $328,000 and $355,000, respectively. The
Company had no capitalized interest in 2003. Interest paid during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003 totaled approximately $6,541,000, $2,328,000 and $1,328,000, respectively.

On July 26, 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with three banks that effectively
converted a portion of its floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis for a period of two years, thus reducing the impact of
interest rate changes on interest expense. The swap agreements, which expired on July 25, 2003, had a combined
notional amount of $30,000,000 whereby the Company paid a fixed rate of interest of 4.52% and received a variable
30-day LIBOR rate. The differential paid or received was accrued as interest rates changed and was recognized as an
adjustment to interest expense in the consolidated income statements.

(11)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements at their carrying amount which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments. The carrying value for the Senior Notes exceeded the fair value by approximately $950,000 at
December 31, 2005. The carrying amount of debt outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004 under the Credit
Agreement approximates fair value because borrowings are for terms of less than six months and have rates that reflect
currently available terms and conditions for similar debt.

(12)

Employee Benefit Plans

The Industrial Group sponsors noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (the “Pension Plans”)
covering certain of its employees. The Pension Plans covering salaried and management employees provide pension
benefits that are based on the employees’ highest five-year average compensation within ten years before retirement.
The Pension Plans covering hourly employees and union members generally provide benefits at stated amounts for
each year of service. All of the Company’s pension plans are frozen to new participants and certain plans are frozen
to additional benefit accruals. The Company’s funding policy is to make the minimum annual contributions required
by the applicable regulations. The Pension Plans’ assets are primarily invested in equity securities and fixed income
securities.

The following table details the components of pension expense:

2005

Service cost .............................................................. $
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation...............
Net amortizations and deferrals.................................
Expected return on plan assets ..................................

Years ended December 31,
2004
(in thousands)
124
$
2,272
480
(2,589)

105
2,202
503
(2,722)

2003

137
2,265
611
(2,430)

287

583

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The following are summaries of the changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets and of the funded

status of the Pension Plans:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year .......................................... $ 39,991
105
Service cost...................................................................................
2,202
Interest cost...................................................................................
140
Actuarial loss ................................................................................
(2,031)
Benefits paid.................................................................................

$ 37,324
124
2,272
2,226
(1,955)

Benefit obligation at end of year.................................................... $ 40,407

$ 39,991

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year ................................. $ 34,232
2,172
Actual return on plan assets...........................................................
10
Company contributions .................................................................
(2,031)
Benefits paid.................................................................................

$ 32,259
2,984
944
(1,955)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year........................................... $ 34,383

$ 34,232

Funded status of the plans:

Benefit obligation at end of year.................................................... $ 40,407
34,383
Fair value of plan assets at end of year...........................................

$ 39,991
34,232

Funded status of plan (underfunded)..............................................
Unrecognized actuarial loss ...........................................................
Unrecognized prior service cost.....................................................

(6,024)
9,515
102

Net asset recognized...................................................................... $

3,593

Balance sheet assets (liabilities):

Prepaid benefit cost ....................................................................... $
Accrued benefit liability................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .........................................

4,968
(6,511)
5,136

(5,759)
9,225
206

3,672

4,871
(5,995)
4,796

Net amount recognized.................................................................. $

3,593

3,672

Pension plans with accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation........................................................... $ 24,996
24,867
Accumulated benefit obligation .....................................................
18,356
Fair value of plan assets ................................................................

Projected benefit obligation and net periodic pension
cost assumptions:
Discount rate...................................................................................
Rate of compensation increase.........................................................
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets ..............................

5.60 %
4.00
8.25

Weighted average asset allocation:

Equity securities..............................................................................
Debt securities ................................................................................

67 %
33

Total ...............................................................................................

100 %

$ 24,272
24,082
18,086

5.75 %
4.00
8.25

64 %
36

100 %

The Company uses November 30 as the measurement date for the Pension Plans. Total estimated
contributions expected to be paid to the plans during 2006 ranges from $900,000 to $1,300,000. The expected long-

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

term rates of return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2005 and 2004 were chosen by the
Company from a best estimate range determined by applying anticipated long-term returns and long-term volatility
for various assets categories to the target asset allocation of the plan. The target asset allocation of plan assets is
equity securities ranging 55-65% and fixed income securities ranging 35-45% of total investments. At December
31, 2005, the equity percentage temporarily exceeded the range due to equity security returns.

At December 31, 2005, the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years, and in

aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

2006......................................................................................................................... $
2007.........................................................................................................................
2008.........................................................................................................................
2009.........................................................................................................................
2010.........................................................................................................................
Thereafter.................................................................................................................

2,420
2,607
2,740
2,866
2,942
15,543

$ 29,118

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan (the “Defined Contribution Plan”) for substantially all
employees of the Company. The Defined Contribution Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k)
of the Internal Revenue Code. The Defined Contribution Plan allows the Company to match participant
contributions and provide discretionary contributions. Contributions to the Defined Contribution Plan in 2005, 2004
and 2003 totaled approximately $2,543,000, $3,238,000 and $2,737,000, respectively.

The Company has self-insured medical plans (the “Medical Plans”) covering substantially all employees.
The number of employees participating in the Medical Plans was approximately 1,853, 1,850 and 1,325 at
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Medical Plans limit the Company’s annual obligations to
fund claims to specified amounts per participant and in the aggregate. The Company is adequately insured for
amounts in excess of these limits. Employees are responsible for payment of a portion of the premiums. During
2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company charged approximately $10,694,000, $10,640,000 and $7,223,000, respectively,
to operations related to medical claims incurred and estimated, reinsurance premiums, and administrative costs for
the Medical Plans. Claims paid during 2005, 2004 and 2003 did not exceed the aggregate limits.

(13)

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases certain of its real property and certain equipment, vehicles and computer hardware
under operating leases with terms ranging from month-to-month to ten years and which contain various renewal and
rent escalation clauses. Future minimum annual lease commitments under operating leases that have initial or
remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

2006......................................................................................................................... $
2007.........................................................................................................................
2008.........................................................................................................................
2009.........................................................................................................................
2010.........................................................................................................................
2011 and thereafter ...................................................................................................

7,597
6,178
5,091
3,771
1,228
3,343

$ 27,208

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 totaled approximately $8,377,000

$7,427,000 and $7,485,000, respectively.

The Company entered into agreements for the sale and leaseback of certain specific manufacturing and
testing equipment during 2001. The terms of the operating leases range from five to nine years and the Company has

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

the option to purchase the equipment at the expiration of the respective lease term at a fixed price based upon the
equipment’s estimated residual value. Lease payments on these operating leases are guaranteed by the Company.
Proceeds from the sale and leaseback transactions during 2001 were approximately $5,420,000 and the transactions
resulted in a deferred loss of approximately $787,000. Deferred losses on sales and leaseback transactions are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective leases. Cumulative deferred losses, including
deferred losses incurred prior to 2001, net of amortization, was approximately $542,000 and $689,000 as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which is included in other assets. Future minimum annual lease
commitments related to these leases are included in the above schedule.

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately

$31,182,000 primarily for the acquisition of inventory and manufacturing equipment.

The Company bears insurance risk as a member of a group captive insurance entity for certain general
liability, automobile and workers' compensation insurance programs and a self-insured employee health program. The
Company records estimated liabilities for its insurance programs based on information provided by the third-party plan
administrators, historical claims experience, expected costs of claims incurred but not paid, and expected costs to settle
unpaid claims. The Company monitors its estimated insurance-related liabilities on a quarterly basis. As facts change, it
may become necessary to make adjustments that could be material to the Company's consolidated results of operations
and financial condition. The Company believes that its present insurance coverage and level of accrued liabilities are
adequate.

The Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the normal course of business.
While the outcome of these matters cannot, at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein,
management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company. For example, the Company has purchased certain plants with
various potential environmental issues under purchase agreements which include indemnification provisions for,
among other things, environmental conditions that existed on the sites at closing.

(14)

Stock Option and Purchase Plans

The Company has certain stock compensation plans under which options to purchase common stock may
be granted to officers, key employees and non-employee directors. Options may be granted at not less than the
market price on the date of grant. Options are exercisable in whole or in part up to two years after the date of grant
and ending ten years after the date of grant.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The following table summarizes option activity for the three years ended December 31, 2005:

Exercise
Price Range

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Balance at January 1, 2003........................................
Granted ....................................................................
Exercised..................................................................
Forfeited...................................................................

1,937,365 $ 1.72 - $ 31.00 $
690,811
(104,730)
(178,061)

6.88 -
1.72 -
3.36 -

16.10
10.50
16.03

Balance at December 31, 2003..................................
Granted ....................................................................
Exercised..................................................................
Forfeited...................................................................

2,345,385
154,280
(144,660)
(138,438)

3.88 -
11.95 -
3.88 -
5.94 -

31.00
21.54
13.50
31.00

Balance at December 31, 2004..................................

2,216,567

3.88 -

25.52

Granted ....................................................................
Exercised..................................................................
Forfeited...................................................................

475,393
(101,522)
(301,493)

9.98 -
4.24 -
5.00 -

15.31
10.25
25.52

8.83
8.78
5.04
9.17

8.96
17.68
7.65
9.70

9.60

11.08
6.14
10.28

Balance at December 31, 2005..................................

2,288,945 $ 3.88 - $ 20.70 $

9.98

The following table summarizes certain weighted average data for options outstanding and currently

exercisable at December 31, 2005:

Outstanding

Exercisable

Exercise Price Range

Weighted Average

Remaining
Exercise Contractual
Price

Life

$3.88 - $6.00 ..............................
$6.01 - $8.00 ..............................
$8.01 - $10.00 ............................
$10.01 - $12.00 ..........................
$12.01 - $14.00 ..........................
$14.01 - $21.00 ..........................

109,652 $
495,596
733,078
500,740
249,683
200,196

4.92
6.95
8.92
10.88
13.36
17.66

Total....................................

2,288,945 $

9.98

4.2
3.0
4.3
5.5
4.6
6.5

4.5

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

87,652 $

355,326
495,786
500,740
249,683
200,196

4.88
7.07
9.21
10.88
13.36
17.66

1,889,383 $ 10.49

On June 27, 2005, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors
approved a program, pursuant to the 2004 Sypris Equity Plan, to authorize the issuance of various restricted stock
awards to key employees, including the Company’s executive officers, in large part pursuant to a newly approved
executive long term incentive program. The awards vest at various rates depending on the type of award issued.

During August of 2005, restricted stock awards potentially representing 127,500 shares of common stock
were granted to Company executives at a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $13.03. Certain shares
are subject to performance requirements. With certain exceptions, the restrictions on one-third of these shares are
removed after three, five and seven years, respectively. During the restricted period, which is commensurate with
each vesting year, the recipients receive dividends and voting rights for the shares. Generally, if a recipient leaves
the Company before the end of the restricted period or if performance requirements are not met, if any, the shares
will be forfeited. The shares have been valued at fair value on the grant date and maximum compensation expense to
be recognized in future periods totals $833,000 net of taxes of $500,000, prior to consideration of forfeitures or
attainment of performance requirements, if any. None of the restricted shares were forfeited at December 31, 2005
and total non-cash compensation expense of $157,000 was recognized as expense during 2005.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The Company’s stock compensation program also provides for the grant of performance-based stock
options to key employees (“Target Options”). The terms and conditions of the Target Options grants provide for the
determination of the exercise price and the beginning of the vesting period to occur when the fair market value of
the Company’s common stock achieves certain targeted price levels. The Company did not grant Performance
Options in 2005 or 2004. Target Options to purchase 116,000 shares of common stock were granted during 2003.
Target Options to purchase 84,000 shares, 17,500 shares and 28,000 shares of common stock were forfeited in 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. One targeted price level of the Target Options was achieved in 2004 and 2002,
resulting in determination of the exercise price and beginning of the vesting period for options to purchase 14,500
and 52,000 shares of common stock, respectively. Target Options for which the targeted price level has not been
achieved totaled 287,000 shares, 371,000 shares and 403,000 shares at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and are excluded from disclosures of options outstanding.

During 2004, the 1994 equity plan expired and was replaced with the 2004 equity plan. A total of
3,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2004 equity plan while the aggregate
number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s stock compensation programs as of
December 31, 2003 was 4,750,000. The aggregate number of shares available for future grant as of December 31,
2005 and 2004 was 2,386,607 and 2,987,000 respectively.

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has
been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of
SFAS No. 123. The fair value for options granted by the Company during 2005, 2004 and 2003 were estimated at
the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Expected life (years).................................................
Expected volatility....................................................
Risk-free interest rates ..............................................
Expected dividend yield............................................

Years ended December 31,
2004
6.8
55.5 %
3.76 %
0.70 %

2005
5.8
53.0 %
4.12 %
1.06 %

2003
7.0
75.0 %
3.69 %
0.95 %

The Company estimated the volatility rate for 2003 and prior based on similar companies’ volatility rates
due to the lack of volume in the Company’s common stock. Effective January 1, 2004, the Company estimated the
expected volatility rate based on the Company’s historical stock price, as the Company determined that its historical
prices provided a more reliable estimate of volatility. The weighted average Black-Scholes value of options granted
under the stock option plans during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $5.47, $9.76 and $5.76 per share, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility estimated life. Changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

The Company stock purchase plan was terminated effective January 31, 2005 and previously provided
substantially all employees who have satisfied the eligibility requirements the opportunity to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock on a compensation deduction basis. The purchase price was the lower of 85% of the fair
market value of the common stock on the first or last business day of the purchase period. Payroll deductions could
not exceed $6,000 for any six-month cycle. At December 31, 2004, there were 75,512 shares available for purchase
under the plan. During 2005, 2004 and 2003, a total of 36,177, 48,357 shares and 38,160 shares, respectively, were
issued under the plan.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(15)

Stockholders’ Equity

On March 17, 2004, the Company completed a public stock offering of 3,000,000 shares of its common
stock, and, on April 8, 2004, an additional 450,000 shares were issued through the exercise of an over-allotment
option. The shares were sold at $17.00 per share and generated proceeds, after underwriting discounts and expenses,
of approximately $55,255,000. Proceeds from the offering were primarily used to repay debt.

The Company has a stockholder rights plan, under which each stockholder owns one right for each
outstanding share of common stock owned. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share
of a new series of preferred stock at an exercise price of $63.00. The rights trade along with, and not separately
from, the shares of common stock unless they become exercisable. If any person or group acquires or makes a tender
offer for 15% or more of the common stock of the Company (except in transactions approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors in advance) the rights become exercisable, and they will separate, become tradable, and entitle
stockholders, other than such person or group, to acquire, at the exercise price, preferred stock with a market value
equal to twice the exercise price. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination with such
person or group, or if 50% of its earning power or assets are sold to such person or group, each right will entitle its
holder, other than such person or group, to acquire, at the exercise price, shares of the acquiring company’s common
stock with a market value of twice the exercise price. The rights will expire on October 23, 2011, unless redeemed
or exchanged earlier by the Company, and will be represented by existing common stock certificates until they
become exercisable.

As of December 31, 2005, 24,850 shares of the Company’s preferred stock were designated as Series A
Preferred Stock in connection with the adoption of the stockholder rights plan. There are no shares of Series A
Preferred Stock currently outstanding. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock will have voting rights, be entitled to
receive dividends based on a defined formula and have certain rights in the event of the Company’s dissolution. The
shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall not be redeemable. However, the Company may purchase shares of Series A
Preferred Stock in the open market or pursuant to an offer to a holder or holders.

Cumulative losses recorded in other comprehensive loss for adjustments in the minimum pension liability,
net of tax, totaled $3,191,000, $2,983,000 and $2,346,000 at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Cumulative foreign currency translation gains recorded in other comprehensive income totaled $1,257,000 and
$618,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2005, other income, net
includes foreign currency remeasurement gains of $871,000. Foreign currency remeasurement gains for the year
ended December 31, 2004 were not significant.

(16)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income
Taxes.” Accordingly, deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between the recognition
of revenue and expenses for financial and income tax reporting purposes and between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements.

The components of income before taxes are as follows:

2005

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)
(in thousands)
8,423
$
3,513
$ 11,936

579
6,989
7,568

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

$ 12,951
—
$ 12,951

Domestic ................................................................ $
Foreign...................................................................

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The components of income tax (benefit) expense are as follows:

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)
(in thousands)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

Current:
Federal ................................................................... $
State .......................................................................
Foreign ...................................................................
Total current income tax expense (benefit) .........

Deferred:
Federal ...................................................................
State .......................................................................
Foreign ...................................................................
Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense .......

661
23
2,654
3,338

(519)
6
(578)
(1,091)

2,247

(350)
33
262
(55)

(870)
(279)
—
(1,149)

2,424
519
749
3,692

3,637

4,938
1,071
—
6,009

4,860

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return which includes all domestic subsidiaries.
Income taxes paid during 2005, 2004 and 2003 totaled approximately $465,000, $4,188,000 and $2,250,000,
respectively. The Company received approximately $4,266,000, $2,555,000 and $1,760,000 in federal income tax
refunds during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $3,925,000 of federal net operating loss
carryforwards available to offset federal taxable income. Such carryforwards reflect income tax losses incurred
which will expire on December 31, 2024.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $8,424,000 of state net operating loss
carryforwards available to offset future state taxable income. Such carryforwards reflect income tax losses incurred
(in thousands) which will expire on December 31 of the following years:

2009......................................................................................................................... $
2010.........................................................................................................................
2011.........................................................................................................................
2017.........................................................................................................................

1,401
560
5,999
464

8,424

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The following is a reconciliation of income tax expense to that computed by applying the federal statutory

rate of 34% to income before income taxes:

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)
(in thousands)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

Federal tax at the statutory rate ................................. $
Current year permanent differences...........................
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit .............
Change in estimate of tax contingencies ....................
Change in estimate of blended tax rate ......................
Research tax credits..................................................
Effect of tax rates of foreign subsidiaries...................
Other........................................................................

2,573
150
23
(200)
144
(100)
(300)
(43)

4,058
112
432
(434)
249
(464)
(183)
(133)

4,403
61
516
—
—
(146)
—
26

2,247

3,637

4,860

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

December 31,

2005

2004

(in thousands)

Deferred tax assets:
Compensation and benefit accruals.................................................. $
Inventory valuation.........................................................................
Federal and State net operating loss carryforwards ..........................
Contract provisions.........................................................................
Accounts receivable allowance........................................................
AMT credits ...................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................

Total deferred tax assets.............................................................

873
2,477
1,991
—
739
584
—

6,664

Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation ...................................................................................
Foreign inventory valuation and other provisions ............................
Defined benefit pension plan...........................................................
Contract provisions.........................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................

(15,644)
(208)
(187)
(33)
(4)

Total deferred tax liabilities .......................................................

(16,076)

730
1,916
2,439
287
661
—
212

6,245

(15,105)
(749)
(269)
—
—

(16,123)

Net deferred tax liability ................................................................... $

(9,412)

(9,878)

Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s future earnings will be sufficient to

ensure the realization of deferred tax assets for federal and state purposes.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act), which was signed into law on October 22, 2004,
introduces a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S.
taxpayer (Repatriation Provision), provided certain criteria are met. The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Staff Position No. FAS 109-2 in December 2004, which requires the recording of tax expense if and
when an entity decides to repatriate foreign earnings subject to the Act. The Company has considered the
implications of the Act on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings, which reduces the Federal income tax rate on
dividends from non-U.S. subsidiaries. The Company did not repatriate earnings under the Act in fiscal 2005 and

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

because it intends to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings outside the U.S., has not provided an estimate for any
U.S. or additional foreign taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries ($7,415,000 at December 31, 2005)
that might be payable if these earnings were repatriated. However, the Company believes that U.S. foreign tax
credits would, for the most part, eliminate any additional U.S. tax.

(17)

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share is
calculated by using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted to include the potentially
dilutive effect of outstanding stock options.

The following table presents information necessary to calculate earnings per common share:

Shares outstanding:

Weighted average shares outstanding.....................
Effect of dilutive employee stock options ..............
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding
and assumed conversions.....................................

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
2005
(Note 2)
(in thousands, except for per share data)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

18,016
307

17,119
626

14,237
416

18,323

17,745

14,653

Net income applicable to common stock ................... $

5,321

8,299

8,091

Earnings per common share:

Basic .................................................................... $
Diluted.................................................................. $

0.30
0.29

$
$

0.48
0.47

$
$

0.57
0.56

Weighted average anti-dilutive options outstanding excluded from diluted earnings per common share were

508,000, 122,000 and 345,000 at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

(18)

Segment Information

The Company is organized into two business groups, the Industrial Group and the Electronics Group. The
Industrial Group is one reportable business segment, while the Electronics Group includes two reportable business
segments, Aerospace & Defense and Test & Measurement. The segments are each managed separately because of
the distinctions between the products, services, markets, customers, technologies, and workforce skills of the
segments. The Industrial Group provides manufacturing services for a variety of customers that outsource forged
and finished steel components and subassemblies. The Industrial Group also manufactures high-pressure closures
and other fabricated products. The Aerospace & Defense reportable segment provides manufacturing and technical
services as an outsourced service provider and manufactures complex data storage systems. The Test &
Measurement reportable segment provides a wide range of technical services for a diversified customer base as an
outsourced service provider and manufactures magnetic instruments, current sensors, and other electronic products.
Revenue derived from outsourced services for the Industrial Group accounted for 67%, 59% and 31% of total net
revenue in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Revenue derived from outsourced services for the Aerospace &
Defense reportable segment accounted for 19%, 24% and 40% of total net revenue in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Revenue derived from outsourced services for the Test & Measurement reportable segment accounted
for 8%, 10% and 12% of total net revenue in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. There was no intersegment net
revenue recognized for any year presented.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

The following table presents financial information for the reportable segments of the Company:

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)
(in thousands)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

Net revenue from unaffiliated customers:
Industrial Group.................................................... $ 359,602

$ 260,410

$ 95,872

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

115,863
47,301

119,179
45,813

141,597
39,136

Electronics Group .................................................

163,164

164,992

180,733

$ 522,766

$ 425,402

$ 276,605

Gross profit:
Industrial Group.................................................... $ 22,916

$ 25,004

9,679

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

Electronics Group .................................................

17,496
10,926

28,422

19,284
9,151

28,435

28,880
7,386

36,266

$ 51,338

$ 53,439

$ 45,945

Operating income (loss):

Industrial Group.................................................... $ 14,014

$ 16,404

6,828

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

Electronics Group .................................................
General, corporate and other..................................

4,305
354

4,659
(6,451)

3,597
(431)

3,166
(5,672)

12,636
(574)

12,062
(4,016)

$ 12,222

$ 13,898

$ 14,874

Total assets:

Industrial Group.................................................... $ 278,967

$ 270,228

$ 122,369

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

83,443
33,631

Electronics Group .................................................
General, corporate and other..................................

117,074
21,583

101,344
33,537

134,881
26,069

88,306
33,254

121,560
20,506

$ 417,624

$ 431,178

$ 264,435

Depreciation and amortization:
Industrial Group.................................................... $ 16,045

$ 10,151

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

Electronics Group .................................................
General, corporate and other..................................

5,642
3,963

9,605
259

5,061
3,553

8,614
301

5,425

4,502
2,632

7,134
272

$ 25,909

$ 19,066

$ 12,831

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

Years ended December 31,
2004
Restated
(Note 2)
(in thousands)

2003
Restated
(Note 2)

2005

Capital expenditures:

Industrial Group.................................................... $ 28,391

$ 42,634

$ 11,790

Aerospace & Defense ........................................
Test & Measurement .........................................

Electronics Group .................................................
General, corporate and other..................................

2,889
4,366

7,255
618

8,399
4,601

13,000
266

5,683
4,938

10,621
110

$ 36,264

$ 55,900

$ 22,521

The Company’s export sales from the U.S. totaled $47,622,000, $37,318,000 and $22,250,000 in 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Approximately $68,671,000 and $26,481,000 of net revenue in 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and $32,304,000 and $24,278,000 of long lived assets at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
relate to the Company’s international operations.

(19)

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following is an analysis of certain items in the consolidated income statements by quarter for the years

ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:

First

Second

Third

Fourth

First

2005

2004 Restated (Note 2)
Second

Third

Fourth

(in thousands, except for per share data)

Net revenue.......................... $ 124,241 $ 125,602 $ 140,811 $ 132,112 $ 89,376 $ 95,896 $ 118,457 $ 121,673
9,911
Gross profit ..........................
(1,035)
Operating income (loss)........
Net income (loss) .................
(801)
Earnings (loss) per
common share:
Basic................................ $
Diluted ............................. $

10,485
385
(251)

12,996
3,353
1,984

13,888
3,656
1,981

14,358
5,550
3,325

15,606
6,186
3,001

16,174
6,030
3,791

11,359
1,995
590

(0.01) $
(0.01) $

0.11 $
0.11 $

0.21 $
0.21 $

0.22 $
0.21 $

0.03 $
0.03 $

0.17 $
0.16 $

(0.04)
(0.04)

Cash dividends declared
per common share .............. $

(20)

Subsequent Event

0.03 $

0.03

On March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date), the Company’s largest customer, Dana, and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries
filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York. Dana's European, South American, Asia-Pacific, Canadian and
Mexican subsidiaries were excluded from the Chapter 11 filing. As of the Filing Date, the Company had been paid
for substantially all outstanding Dana accounts receivable recorded in the balance sheet at December 31, 2005.
Accounts receivable from domestic Dana subsidiaries at the Filing Date could be subject to compromise, right of
offset or set aside as a protected payment under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing. As of the Filing Date and excluding
certain gain contingencies, we estimated amounts due from Dana to approximate $28,600,000 including up to an
estimated $13,000,000 due from Dana Mexico, in addition to potential offsets from accounts payable and other
protected claims of approximately $12,000,000, although right of offset and protected claims have not been
approved by the Bankruptcy Court. We continue to pursue additional offsets to further reduce our net receivable
position. Under the Chapter 11 proceedings, right of offset may not be granted, certain payments made by Dana to
the Company in the 90 days preceding Dana’s Chapter 11 filing could be subject to return as a “preference”, or our
shipments may not be protected, which would increase our net receivable position. Accounts receivable and payable

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

from Dana Mexico are not currently subject to compromise under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing and continue to be
received and paid in normal course.

The Company has purchase agreements with Dana which include indemnification provisions for, among
other things, environmental conditions that existed on the sites acquired from Dana at closing. Amounts due from
Dana, if any, may also be subject to compromise or rejection under Dana’s Chapter 11 filing.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive
Officer (the “CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including
the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Sypris Solutions, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f).
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Additionally, Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditors and a registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report on our assessment of Sypris Solutions, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which is
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
December 31, 2005, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Our Credit Agreement was amended in February 2006 to revise certain financial covenants. Other terms of the
Credit Agreement remained substantially unchanged. The executed amendment to our Credit Agreement is included in
the form of Exhibit 10.6.9 to this Form 10-K.

Our Senior Notes were amended in March 2006 to revise certain financial covenants. Other terms of the
Credit Agreement remained substantially unchanged. The executed amendment to our Senior Notes is included in the
form of Exhibit 10.7.2 to this Form 10-K.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

PART III

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from sections of the Company’s Proxy
Statement titled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Governance of the Company –
Committees of the Board of Directors,” “Governance of the Company – Audit and Finance Committee,” “Proposal
One, Election of Directors,” and “Executive Officers,” which Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to instruction G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K.

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of its directors, officers (including
its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and any person performing similar functions)
and employees. The Company has made the Code of Business Conduct available on its website at www.sypris.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from sections of the Company’s Proxy
Statement titled “Governance of the Company – Compensation of Directors,” “Governance of the Company –
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Option Grants in
Last Fiscal Year,” “Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Option Values on December 31, 2005” and
“Defined Benefit Pension Plan” which Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to instruction G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from the sections of the Company’s Proxy
Statement titled “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” which
Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to instruction G(3) of the General
Instructions to Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from the sections of the Company’s Proxy
Statement titled “Governance of the Company – Certain Employees,” which Proxy Statement will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to instruction G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from the section of the Company’s Proxy
Statement titled “Relationship with Independent Public Accountants,” which Proxy Statement will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to instruction G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

1. Financial Statements

The financial statements as set forth under Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K are included.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other consolidated financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is

shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto or they are not applicable.

3. Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

Description

Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 filed on August 3, 2004
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed May 9, 2002 (No. 333-87880)).

Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 filed on March 5, 1999).

Rights Agreement dated as of October 23, 2001 between the Company and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as Rights Agent, including as Exhibit A the Form of Certificate of Designation and as
Exhibit B the Form of Right Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Purchase and Sale Agreement among Honeywell Inc., Defense Communications Products Corporation
(prior name of Group Technologies Corporation) and Group Financial Partners, Inc. dated May 21,
1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-
1 filed May 18, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76326)).

Purchase and Sale Agreement among Alliant Techsystems Inc., MAC Acquisition I, Inc. and Group
Technologies Corporation dated December 31, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 18, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76326)).

Purchase and Sale Agreement among Philips Electronic North America Corporation and Group
Technologies Corporation dated June 25, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 18, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76326)).

Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 6, 2001 by and between Tube Turns Technologies, Inc. and
Dana Corporation as amended by a First Amendment dated May 4, 2001 and as amended by a Second
Amendment on May 15, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001 filed on July 30, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-
24020)).

10.5

Asset Purchase Agreement between Sypris Technologies, Inc. and Dana Corporation dated December
8, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 filed on February 12, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Exhibit
Number

10.6

10.6.1

10.6.2

10.6.3

10.6.4

10.6.5

10.6.6

10.6.7

10.6.8

Description

1999 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions,
Inc., Bell Technologies, Inc., Tube Turns Technologies, Inc., Group Technologies Corporation and
Metrum-Datatape, Inc. dated October 27, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 filed on February 25, 2000
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2000A Amendment to Loan Documents between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Bell Technologies, Inc., Tube Turns Technologies, Inc., Group Technologies Corporation and
Metrum-Datatape, Inc. dated November 9, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 filed on March 2, 2001
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2001A Amendment to Loan Documents between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Bell Technologies, Inc., Tube Turns Technologies, Inc., Group Technologies Corporation and
Metrum-Datatape, Inc. dated February 15, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2001 filed on April 30, 2001
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2002A Amendment to Loan Documents between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc. and Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC dated December 21, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6.3 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
filed on January 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2002B Amendment to Loan Documents between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc. and Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC dated July 3, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 filed on July
29, 2002 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2003A Amendment to Loan Documents between Bank One, Kentucky, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc. and Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC dated October 16, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28,
2003 filed on October 29, 2003 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2005A Amendment to Loan Documents between JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc., Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC and Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc. dated March
10, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.6 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 11, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2005B Amendment to Loan Documents between JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc., Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC and Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc. dated May 10,
2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 5, 2005
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

2005C Amendment to Loan Documents between JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc., Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC and Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc. dated August
3, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 5,
2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Exhibit
Number

10.6.9

10.7

10.7.1

10.7.2

10.8

10.8.1

10.9

10.10

10.11*

10.12*

10.13*

Description

2006A Amendment to Loan Documents between JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data
Systems, Inc., Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC and Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc. dated February
28, 2006.

Note Purchase Agreement between The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Connecticut
General Life Insurance Company, Life Insurance Company of North America, Jefferson Pilot
Financial Insurance Company, Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company, Jefferson Pilot LifeAmerica
Insurance Company, and Sypris Solutions, Inc. dated as of June 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 filed on
August 3, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement between The Guardian Life Insurance Company of
America, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Life Insurance Company of North America,
Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company, Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company, Jefferson Pilot
LifeAmerica Insurance Company, and Sypris Solutions, Inc. dated as of August 3, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 5, 2005 (Commission File
No. 000-24020)).

Second Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement between The Guardian Life Insurance Company of
America, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Life Insurance Company of North America,
Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company, Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company, Jefferson Pilot
LifeAmerica Insurance Company, and Sypris Solutions, Inc. dated as of March 13, 2006.

Lease between John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and Honeywell, Inc. dated April 27,
1979; related Notice of Assignment from John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company to Sweetwell
Industrial Associates, L.P., dated July 10, 1986; related Assignment and Assumption of Lease between
Honeywell, Inc. and Defense Communications Products Corporation (prior name of Group
Technologies Corporation) dated May 21, 1989; and related Amendment I to Lease Agreement
between Sweetwell Industries Associates, L.P. and Group Technologies Corporation dated October 25,
1991, regarding Tampa industrial park property (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 18, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76326)).

Agreement related to Fourth Renewal of Lease between Sweetwell Industries Associates, L.P. and
Group Technologies Corporation dated November 1, 2000, regarding Tampa industrial park property
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000 filed on March 2, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Lease between Metrum-Datatape, Inc. (assignee of Metrum, Inc.) and Alliant Techsystems, Inc. dated
March 29, 1993 and amended July 29, 1993, May 2, 1994, November 14, 1995, December 4, 1996 and
February 12, 1998 regarding 4800 East Dry Creek Road Property (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 1998 filed on August 4,
1998 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Lease between Sypris Data Systems, Inc. and Via Verde Venture, LLC. dated September 24, 2003
regarding 160 East Via Verde, San Dimas, California (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed on February 12, 2004
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees as Amended and Restated effective
February 26, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on May
9, 2002 (Registration No. 333-87880)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Share Performance Program For Stock Option Grants dated July 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 28, 1998 filed on August 4, 1998 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Independent Directors’ Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated effective
February 26, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on May
9, 2002 (Registration No. 333-87882)).

Exhibit
Number

10.14*

10.15*

10.16*

10.17*

10.18*

10.19*

10.20*

10.21*

10.22*

10.23*

10.24*

10.25*

10.26*

10.27

10.28

Description

Sypris Solutions, Inc., Directors Compensation Program As Amended and Restated Effective February
24, 2004 and as amended December 15, 2004, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).
Sypris Solutions, Inc. Directors Compensation Program adopted on September 1, 1995 Amended and
Restated on March 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K
filed on March 3, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Executive Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2003 filed on
April 30, 2003 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed on
March 11, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-
24020)).

2004 Sypris Equity Plan effective as of April 27, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 filed on April 30, 2004
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).
Form of non-qualified stock option award agreement for non-employee directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2004 (Commission File
No. 000-24020)).

Form of non-qualified stock option award agreement for grants to executive officers and other key
employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December
21, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of performance-based stock option award agreement for grants to executive officers and other
key employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on
December 21, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for grants to executive officers and other key employees
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2005
(Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Six-Year Stock Option for grants to
executive officers and other key employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements to Accelerate Vesting Periods for Certain
“Underwater” Options for grants to executive officers and other key employees (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
filed on March 11, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020))

Employment Agreement by and between Metrum-Datatape, Inc. and G. Darrell Robertson dated
February 28, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 filed on March 2, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Underwriting Agreement dated March 20, 2002 among Sypris Solutions, Inc., Needham & Company,
Inc. and A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 filed on April 29, 2002 (Commission File
No. 000-24020)).

Underwriting Agreement dated March 11, 2004 among Sypris Solutions, Inc. and Needham &
Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 filed on April 30, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Exhibit
Number

10.29*

10.30*

10.31*

10.32*

10.33*

10.34*

10.35*

10.36*

10.37*

10.38*

10.39*

10.40*

10.41*

Description

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Directors Compensation Program adopted on September 1, 1995 Amended and
Restated on March 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K
filed on March 3, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements to Accelerate Vesting Periods for Certain
“Underwater” Options for grants to executive officers and other key employees (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 6, 2005 (Commission File No.
000-24020)).

Amendment to Stock Option Agreements to David D. Johnson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 6, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Sypris Solutions, Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan (July 1, 2005 – December 31, 2005) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2005 (Commission File No.
000-24020)).

Form of Two-Year Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Grants to Executive Officers and Other Key
Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 27,
2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Amended Form of Two-Year Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Grants to Executive Officers and
Other Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on
August 5, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Form of 1-3-5 Year Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Grants to Executive Officers and Other
Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June
27, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Amended Form of 1-3-5 Year Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Grants to Executive Officers and
Other Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on
August 5, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Long-term Incentive Program and Form of Long-term Incentive Award Agreements for Grants to
Executive Officers and Other Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Amended Executive Long-Term Incentive Program and Alternate Form of Executive Long-Term
Incentive Award Agreements for Grants to Executive Officers and Other Key Employees (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 5, 2005 (Commission File
No. 000-24020)).

Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements to Accelerate Vesting Periods for Certain
“Underwater” Options for grants to executive officers and other key employees (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2006 (Commission File No.
000-24020)).

Letter Regarding Change in Accounting Principles (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18 to the
Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 6, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-24020)).

Subsidiaries of the Company

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

31.1

CEO certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit
Number

Description

31.2

CFO certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

CEO and CFO certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
March 15, 2006.

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Registrant)

/s/ Jeffrey T. Gill
(Jeffrey T. Gill)
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 15, 2006:

/s/ Robert E. Gill
(Robert E. Gill)

/s/ Jeffrey T. Gill
(Jeffrey T. Gill)

/s/ T. Scott Hatton
(T. Scott Hatton)

/s/ Jeffrey T. Reibel
(Jeffrey T. Reibel)

/s/ John F. Brinkley
(John F. Brinkley)

/s/ William G. Ferko
(William G. Ferko)

/s/ Henry F. Frigon
(Henry F. Frigon)

/s/ R. Scott Gill
(R. Scott Gill)

/s/ William L. Healey
(William L. Healey)

/s/ Sidney R. Petersen
(Sidney R. Petersen)

/s/ Robert Sroka
(Robert Sroka)

Chairman of the Board

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Director

SCHEDULE II

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

Charged to
Other
Accounts
(in thousands)

Deductions

Balance at
End of
Period

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

Year ended December 31, 2005................. $

1,697 $

607 $

Year ended December 31, 2004................. $

594 $

1,842 $

Year ended December 31, 2003................. $

523 $

191 $

—

(406) (1) $

1,898

(739) (1) $

1,697

(120) (1) $

594

Reserve for inactive, obsolete and unsalable
inventory:

Year ended December 31, 2005................. $

5,902 $

739 $

—

(299) (2) $

6,342

Year ended December 31, 2004................. $

5,146 $

1,520 $

335 (3) $

(1,099) (2) $

5,902

Year ended December 31, 2003................. $

4,441 $

832 $

328 (3)$

(455) (2) $

5,146

(1) Uncollectible accounts written off.
(2)
(3)

Inactive, obsolete and unsalable inventory written off.
Excess and obsolete reserve assumed in acquisition.

(This page left intentionally blank)

SYPRIS ON NASDAQ
The common stock of Sypris
trades on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol SYPR.

TRANSFER AGENT
LaSalle Bank N.A.
135 South LaSalle Street
Suite 1811
Chicago, IL 60603
Phone: (800) 246-5761
Fax: (312) 904-2236

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP
400 West Market Street
Suite 2100
Louisville, KY 40202
Phone: (502) 585-1400
Fax: (502) 584-4221

CORPORATE COUNSEL
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP
500 West Jefferson Street
Suite 2800
Louisville, KY 40202
Phone: (502) 589-5235
Fax: (502) 589-0309

INVESTOR INFORMATION

CORPORATE ADDRESS
Sypris Solutions, Inc.
101 Bullitt Lane
Suite 450
Louisville, KY 40222
Phone: (502) 329-2000
Fax: (502) 329-2050

ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be
held on Tuesday, May 2, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.
at 101 Bullitt Lane, Lower Level Seminar
Room, Louisville, Kentucky.

FOR MORE INFORMATION
To learn more about Sypris Solutions, Inc.,
visit our site on the World Wide Web at
www.sypris.com.

INVESTOR MATERIALS
The Sypris Web page – www.sypris.com – is
your entry point for a vast array of information
about Sypris, including its products, financial
information, real-time stock quotes, links to each
of its subsidiary operations, corporate governance
information and other useful information.

For investor information, including additional
annual reports, 10-Ks, 10-Qs or any other financial
literature, please contact Carroll A. Dunavent,
Director, Law and Compliance, 101 Bullitt Lane,
Suite 450, Louisville, KY 40222.

Forward-Looking Statements
This report includes non-historical or “forward-looking”
statements concerning future events or conditions.
Important risk factors, which could cause actual results to
differ materially from these statements, are set forth in
Item 1A. Risk Factors in the accompanying Form 10-K.

Front Cover, left to right:
Jennifer Nicholes, Frank Fritton,
Cynthia Belak, Eduardo Goitia

Back Cover, left to right:
Rosanna Bolduc, Fernando Garcia,
Larry Tyre, Kenny Mullins

101 Bullitt Lane, Suite 450
Louisville, Kentucky 40222
Phone (502) 329-2000
Fax (502) 329-2050
www.sypris.com