Teranga Gold Corporation Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

FOCUSED ON GROWTH FOCUSED 2012 ANNUAL REPORT T E R A N G A G O L D C O R P O R A T I O N 2 0 1 2 A N N U A L R E P O R T STRENGTH FINANCIAL PRODUCTION GROWING RESERVES GROWING FOCUSED ON message from THe eXeCUTIVe CHaIrmaN aND THe PresIDeNT ALAN HILL EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN RICHARD YOUNG PRESIDENT AND CEO Dear Fellow Shareholders, The year 2012 was a record for Teranga, full of accomplishments, challenges as well as some changes. We would like to first address one of the changes we made to our Management Team. The two of us have worked together in various roles for over two decades, and in our current capacities at Teranga, it is a natural progression that Richard assumes the role of President and CEO and that Alan take on the role of Executive Chairman. We work very well together and look forward to a strong and continued collaboration for many years to come. We believe that a company is only as successful as its people, and as such, we continue to build out our corporate and site management teams, adding new talent and depth, that we are confident will serve us well as we execute on our growth plans. During a year of increased market volatility and persistent concerns about global fiscal and economic challenges, we remained focused on our objectives, and as such we had a strong year. The year however, was not without its challenges, but we are very pleased to say that with the perseverance of our team we achieved several goals that will help support and bolster the Company’s continued growth. We have the only milling facility in Senegal and the largest exploration land package in an emerging gold district, which we believe provides us with the basis for growth in reserves, production, earnings, cash flow and most importantly, free cash flow as new discoveries are made or acquired and processed through our expanded central mill facility. Our share price performed reasonably well in 2012 compared to our peer group. Since the start of 2013, however, gold equities in general have fallen under mounting scrutiny, which, combined with declining gold prices in April, resulted in many companies reaching new 52-week lows. Teranga has not been immune to this trend; in fact our share price in early 2013 was among the poorest performers. It is in this context that we decided to review our 2012 performance and our original objectives, and examine where we believe the Company is going in an environment which has forced many companies to rethink their business plans. 2012 was the Company’s best year for both production and cash costs while we met our guidance for the year. With the mill expansion complete and the benefit of higher grade material, production was 214,310 ounces, up 63 percent over the prior year, while cash costs per ounce sold were $627, down 20 percent from 2011. Our operating results translated into record earnings of $79.9 million or 33 cents per share. Our health and safety record was commendable with our lost-time-injury-frequency rate remaining far below industry benchmarks. However, regardless of our perfor- mance in this area, we continue to be pro-active and focus our efforts on continual improvement. The completion of our mill expansion to increase capacity from an average of 2 to ~4 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) (averaging 3.5Mtpa of 100% hard ore and 6Mtpa 100% soft ore) was delayed by a quarter, due to issues with suppliers meeting delivery schedules for steel and cabling. This delay pushed commissioning into the rainy season which presented its own set of challenges and set- backs. We are working through the remaining challenges and we will continue to work to improve availability, particularly of the crushing circuit, to increase throughput. Though we will be mining through lower grade areas of the pit in 2013, we expect to produce between 190,000 and 210,000 ounces of gold at a cash cost of $650–$700 per ounce benefiting from the expansion, which should result in another profitable year. At the time of the IPO in 2010 we had four overriding objectives: (i) expand the mill to solidify our dominant position on an emerging gold belt; (ii) conduct an aggressive exploration program on the highly prospective yet virtually unexplored land package; (iii) consolidate the region; and (iv) eliminate the hedge book as quickly but as prudently as possible. With the additional capacity added in 2012, the objective of the Mine License exploration program is to continue to extend the life of mine at a production rate of about 200,000 ounces per year to the years 2020 to 2025, which would result in a 10 to 15-year mine life since the IPO in 2010. While we had targeted to reach this reserve level by mid-2013, it will likely require another 6 to 12 months to extend the mine life to at least 2020 and beyond at current production rates. We recognize that this is longer than we had originally hoped, but we would like to empha- size how profitable ounces added within the Mine License are to earnings and free cash flow. On this note, we expect that we will have access to drill some of our highest priority t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 1 oUr mIssIoN oUr VIsIoN Our mission is to share the benefits with all our stakeholders through re- sponsible mining. We strive to act as a responsible corporate citizen by build- ing projects together with the commu- nities and by being committed to using best available technologies as we carry out our actions. We aim to achieve benefits for all parties involved, and to contribute to the sustainability and improved livelihoods for the communi- ties in which we operate. • PHase 1: BeCome a mID-TIer golD ProDUCer in Senegal with 250,000 to 350,000 ounces of annual gold production leveraging off our existing mill and infrastructure • Phase 2: Increase annual gold ProductIon to 400,000 to 500,000 ounces with a second mill expansion • set the benchmark In senegal for resPonsIble mInIng, improving the standard of living for those in the communities in which we operate and provide the communities with the ability to become truly independent and sustainable for decades to come, even after the closure of our mining operations targets on the southern portion of our Mine License, such as Niakafiri, in the second quarter of this year, based on our new agreement with the Government, which we are confi- dent will add ounces to our reserve base this year. However, with the new agreement with the Government, five key exploration licenses have been extended by 18 months allowing us to defer drill programs this year. In respect of our regional exploration program, we remain very optimistic. However, we have a great deal of land and a lot of targets which require systematic analysis; in total we have about 50 targets at various stages in the pipeline. Some targets are larger than our entire Mine License, and thus require an extensive multi-year exploration program. We are establishing a pipeline of targets in various stages with Gora being the most advanced to date. We plan to permit Gora in 2013 with production expected in the first half of 2014. Gora is a smaller satellite deposit that could add about 70,000 ounces to production annually for 4 years, displacing some lower grade Sabodala material. Therefore, Gora alone will take us toward our Phase I vision of grow- ing the Company to 250,000 ounces of annual production. While we continue to look for “the big one," today we have about 12 priority targets, 5 of which we will be focusing on in the near term, with the objective of making discoveries that will ultimately translate into reserves and production. In light of the lower gold prices in 2013, we are minimizing regional drilling to maximize cash flows during this period. With regard to industry consolidation in Senegal, there are several companies that have made discoveries, but for business reasons may decide not to build a mill, particularly in light of the current market. While these discoveries may not be economic on a standalone basis, they could be very accretive to the Company as we leverage our existing mill and infrastructure, bearing in mind that most of the Senegalese greenstone belt is within trucking distance of our mill. Though the Company regularly analyzes all gold opportunities in Senegal, it would not have been prudent to make any acquisitions until the Government addressed certain fiscal issues thereby permitting the Company to acquire 100 percent of an asset. The Agreement in Principle signed in early April 2013 with the Republic of Senegal paves the way for the Company to invest, acquire and develop its assets with greater certainty in Senegal. This Agreement not only provides more certainty that our discoveries may be processed through our mill but it will also allow us to potentially consolidate the region. WHaT We DID IN 2012: • Continued systematic regional exploration program – expanding our development pipeline • Record profits, production and cash costs – met our 2012 guidance • Completed the mill expansion • Reduced our hedge book to 59,789 ounces as at December 31, 2012 • Completed and submitted the technical study and ESIA for the Gora satellite deposit • Conducted an extensive drill program to the north and to depth of the Sabodala pit • Increased Measured and Indicated resources 34 percent to 2.9 million ounces, while gold reserves remain similar to 2011 net of production • Held round table meetings to advance the Regional Development Strategy and improve our CSR initiatives • Continued to strengthen and enhance our culture of safety • Added depth to our Management Team both in the corporate office and on site t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 2 In order to execute on our vision the Company must remain financially strong. We ended 2012 with $45 million in cash, cash equivalents and bullion receivables, including $5.3 million in bullion receivables. With the turbulence in the gold market, we have reduced discretionary expenditures in operations, exploration and administration, as well as development and sustaining capital. These changes mean that at a gold price of $1,400 per ounce we expect to generate free cash flow this year, ensuring that we remain in a robust financial position. We will continue to monitor the gold market and if gold prices recover, then we may increase our expenditures in respect of the development of Gora or increase exploration spend- ing if we have success, otherwise we remain committed to maintaining a lower level of expenditures to ensure that we generate stronger free cash flows and strengthen our financial position. On April 15th, 2013 we officially eliminated our hedge book by buying back the remaining 14,500 ounces of forward sales contracts still outstanding, as gold prices declined to the mid $1,300 per ounce range. The hedge book was originally put into place as a requirement for project financing to build Sabodala, which was paid off in 2010. Since the IPO we have delivered about half of our produc- tion into these forward sales contracts at below $850 per ounce, negatively impacting our cash margins and free cash flows. Now with the elimination of the hedge book, even in a lower gold price environment, our cash margins should rise significantly. This margin expansion should go straight to our bottom line, increasing earnings, cash flow and free cash flow. As a result, we expect our financial position to strengthen in 2013 and beyond. We believe that we will have the balance sheet and free cash flow that will enable us to execute on our growth plan while at the same time maintaining our focus on limiting dilution to our shareholders. In 2012, Senegal had a successful and smooth change in government; however, the country still faces many of the same financial challenges as most other developing nations in terms of generating additional revenues. The Government also inherited several politically important internal issues from the prior Government, which has occupied a significant amount of their time and attention. Nevertheless, in early April 2013 the Company signed an Agreement in Principle with the Government securing the basis for long-term investment and development to increase reserves and production in Senegal with certainty. This is a landmark agreement that benefits all of our stake- holders, including our shareholders, employees, the local and regional communities and the people of Senegal. In return, we have agreed to increase our royalty rate from 3 to 5 percent, to begin paying a portion of accrued dividends in respect of the Government’s minority interest, as well as a price and formula to acquire the Government’s additional participation option in satellite deposits. We were also able to settle several outstanding tax assessments. t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 3 3 WHAT WE DID IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER OF 2013: • Eliminated the hedge book • Finalized a new $50 million mobile equipment facility • Signed an Agreement in Principle with the Republic of Senegal that paves the way for long-term investment and development to increase reserves and production • Reduced discretionary expenditures to ensure that the Company generates free WHAT WE PLAN TO DO IN THE SECOND AND THIRD TRIMESTER OF 2013: • Increase reserves and future production by: – Establishing final pit design for Sabodala – Resuming drilling at Niakafiri on our Mine License – Advancing promising regional targets through the pipeline – Evaluating opportunities to acquire discoveries already made and process them through our mill – Permitting and beginning development of the Gora deposit • Optimize the mill • Formalize the Regional Development Strategy in collaboration with the communities and other key stakeholders cash flow at $1,400 per ounce gold • Continue to strengthen and enhance our culture of safety In addition to working closely with the Government, we continue our involvement with the local communities that surround our operations. Corporate Social Responsibility is truly a priority for us and a very large part of our culture at Teranga. We have made great strides this year focusing on health and safety, education and sustainability, in addition to helping improve public access to potable water. In sup- porting these initiatives, we have made a true commitment to the people of Senegal. To help us in this regard, we have engaged rePlan, a renowned Canadian organization to assist us in putting together a Regional Development Strategy. Together with the local, regional and national governments we are working to ensure that the benefits of our project are shared, and the livelihoods of people in the communities in which we operate are improved. We have held many round table discussions in collaboration with multiple stakeholders with the objective of formalizing and implementing this strategy in 2013. This is definitely one of the most rewarding aspects of our work and we are very excited as we work together with the people of Senegal to create a better future and share the benefits of responsible mining with all of our stakeholders. As shareholders we recognize that 2012 was another frus- trating year in the gold equity markets, and the beginning of 2013 has been even more disappointing. The appeal for gold as an investment has faced recent pressure, despite persistent concerns about the global economy, geopolitical uncertainties and the outlook for global currencies. This pressure on the commodity has been accompanied by a dramatic decline in share prices for the sector. The global necessity to stimulate economic growth and address high unemployment, sovereign debt concerns, geopolitical concerns, and continued civil unrest in many regions of the world are all factors that have contributed to an increasingly uncertain and unpredictable economic environment. Though we may continue to see short-term negative pressure on the gold price, global macroeconomic indicators remain weak, reinforcing the positive long-term outlook for gold. With our hedge book eliminated, we are now selling all of our production at spot gold prices, resulting in margin ex- pansion that should go straight to our bottom line providing us with the flexibility to grow, while limiting dilution to our shareholders. As we continue to watch the equity markets, we remain focused on all factors that are within our control and more importantly to deliver on our promises. Our cur- rent priority is to extend our reserve life while strengthening our financial position. We believe that by delivering on our vision and growing the Company, as we are confident that we can, a corresponding increase in earnings, cash flow and free cash flow should lead to a higher share price. To conclude, we would like to thank our employees for their continued hard work and dedication and our shareholders who have been patient and supportive through these tumultuous times. We are confident that Teranga has a bright future because the Company is operating in a stable, safe and mining friendly country that hosts one of the new emerging gold districts. Our operations continue to run consistently and we are building a team that can execute on our objectives while we continue to strengthen our balance sheet. With your on-going support, we will main- tain our focus on the priorities we believe will make our collective vision a reality. Alan R. Hill Executive Chairman Richard S. Young President and CEO t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 4 FOCUSED ON GROWING RESERVES 1.59m oz RESERVES WITHIN 2.87m oz OF M&I RESOURCES • Objective of expanding reserves to 2020– • Expect to add to reserves from the 2025 at a production rate of 200,000 oz/yr Mine License in 2013 • Growth through our focused • Regional Land Package ~50 targets FINANCIAL STRENGTH • 100% hedge free providing margin expansion • Building a stronger balance sheet to self-fund exploration and project development exploration program • Growth through J.V.s and acquisitions of • Competitive cash costs among our peers • Generating free cash flows with option to reinvest in project development or exploration • Minimal sustaining capital • No requirement to dilute shareholders to continue operations or for organic project development other companies or properties initially within Senegal but eventually in West Africa GROWING PROFITABLE PRODUCTION • Production to increase with development of first satellite deposit, Gora • Inexpensive inclusion of satellite deposits through utilization of our existing infrastructure • Mill capacity expanded in 2012 with the option to increase further as new discoveries are made • Agreement in Principle with Government to put all ounces not on our Mine License through our mill 2011 131,641 oz 2012 214,310 oz 2013 190k–210k oz est. 2014 200k–250k oz est. WHY INVEST OPERATING MINE/MILL BUILDING A STRONGER BALANCE SHEET RECENTLY EXPANDED MILL TO ~4MTPA • Focused on free cash flow • Only operating gold mine and • By maximizing margins through mill in Senegal elimination of hedge book • Ability to self-fund exploration and project development 1,200 km2 LARGE EXPLORATION LAND PACKAGE EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT TEAM ~1,200KM2 OF UNDER-EXPLORED LAND SURROUNDING OUR EXISTING MILL • An emerging world-class gold district with • Extensive proven track record in African gold mining – strong relations with Government >11M oz discovered over last 5 years • Dedicated to mining responsibly and sharing the benefits t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 5 OPERATIONS Sabodala is the only operating gold mine and mill in Senegal Mining at Sabodala is undertaken by open pit truck and shovel methods. The recently expanded mill is capable of processing 3.5Mtpa of hard ore or almost 6.0Mtpa of soft ore. The conventional carbon-in-leach (“CIL”) plant includes primary and secondary crushing, a SAG and two ball mills and leach tanks to produce dore bars of gold (90% gold/10% silver). Power at Sabodala is provided by a 36MW heavy fuel oil power station located on the mine site. Sabodala is expected to generate significant free cash flow in the coming years as the mine and mill are now built and sustaining capital going forward is minimal. Free cash flow will be used to fund reserve and production growth to minimize dilution to existing shareholders. Operating results Tonnes mined Ore tonnes milled Head grade Gold produced Total cash cost (incl. royalties) 1, 2 Mining (cost/t mined) Milling (cost/t milled) G&A (cost/t milled) Year ending December 31 2012 Actuals 2013 Guidance Range (‘000t) (‘000t) (g/t) (oz) $/oz sold 28,877 35,000 – 36,500 2,439 3.08 3,300 – 3,400 2.00 – 2.15 214,310 190,000 – 210,000 627 650 – 700 2.71 20.39 6.16 2.50 – 2.70 19.00 – 20.00 5.00 – 6.00 1 Total cash cost per ounce and total production cost per ounce are non-IFRS financial measures with no standard meaning under IFRS 2 For 2013, reflects the impact of adoption of a new IFRS standard for deferred stripping t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 6 Management’s current priority is to extend reserves both organically and inorganically while strengthening the Company’s financial position. t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 7 ReseRves and PRoduction GRowth Masato seneGaL saBodaLa Senegal is emerging as a significant new gold camp, with more than 11 million ounces of resources discovered over the past five years. dinKoKhono niaKaFiRi MINE LICENSE The Mine License (“ML”) exploration program is designed to extend the life of mine to the years 2020 to 2025 at a production rate of about 200,000 ounces of gold per year. Extending the reserve life on the ML is expected to come from expanding the Sabodala pit at depth and expanding the Niakafiri deposit, to the south of the Sabodala pit, as well as, defining a number of other promising targets on the ML. Deposit Sabodala Sutuba Niakafiri Gora Stockpiles Total Proven and Probable Measured and Indicated Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) Au (Moz) Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) Au (Moz) 17.62 1.34 0.758 59.53 1.09 2.09 0.37 7.81 2.1 7.32 1.40 0.017 0.50 1.27 0.02 1.14 0.287 10.70 1.12 0.39 4.22 0.284 2.32 5.00 0.37 1.02 0.24 – – – 35.23 1.40 1.586 73.05 1.22 2.87 * For full disclosure on Reserves and Resources, see page 11 of the 2012 Annual Report - Financial Statements t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 8 (cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)(cid:31)REGIONAL LAND PACKAGE Development of the high grade Gora satellite deposit is expected to provide high grade/ low-cost feed to the Sabodala plant beginning in 2014, increasing production toward our Phase 1 vision to produce 250,000 ounces of gold per year. The Regional Land Package (“RLP”) consisted of over 100 gold anomalies at the time of the IPO in December 2010. A systematic regional exploration program over the past two years has narrowed that down to 50 targets all within trucking distance to the Sabodala mill. Of the 50 targets now in the pipeline, 12 are considered high priority targets that will be drilled over the next 12 to 24 months. Beyond the Company’s existing land position, the Company intends to augment its organic growth by acquiring discoveries already made by other mining companies and processing these through the Sabodala mill. Massakounda Permit MALI N Heremakono Permit 35Km from mill EXPLORATION OPPORTUNITIES GorA ProSPECTS And TArGETS SAbodAlA mill mAJor Gold dEPoSiTS mininG liCEnSE ExPlorATion PErmiT SENEGAL Bransan Permit Saiansoutou Permit Dembala Berola Permit Mine License Sounkounkou Permit Bransan South Permit SABODALA MILL Sabodala West Permit Makana Permit Garaboureya North Permit Deposit Sabodala Sutuba Niakafiri Gora Stockpiles Total Proven and Probable Measured and Indicated Tonnes Grade (Mt) (g/t) Au (Moz) Tonnes Grade Au (Mt) (g/t) (Moz) 17.62 1.34 0.758 59.53 1.09 2.09 0.37 7.81 2.1 7.32 1.40 0.017 0.50 1.27 0.02 1.14 0.287 10.70 1.12 0.39 4.22 0.284 2.32 5.00 0.37 1.02 0.24 – – – 35.23 1.40 1.586 73.05 1.22 2.87 t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 9 oUr PeoPle / Csr We are committed to mining responsibly and sharing the benefits with all of our stakeholders. Teranga’s stakeholders are central to our safe, stable and continued growth in Senegal. As part of our Corporate Social Responsibility plan we continually engage with all of our stakeholders including our employees and the communities in which we operate in order to improve the lives of the people with whom we work. Our community development work contin- ued in 2012 through 14 projects to improve access to secure potable water sources and sanitation for the local people. We also undertook improvements to local roads and infrastructure and continued to support the creation of local businesses to improve the income-generating potential of those in the local community. To support the local community we have put into place several initiatives to improve the livelihoods of the communities near our operations. Our focus is on a grassroots community approach with an emphasis on health, education, water sanitation and food security. In 2012, we continued our support for local students at all education levels through the building of schools, providing books and providing bursaries, scholarships and work experience terms to university students. In addition, we have also continued our support for healthcare in the region through six separate initiatives including an extensive anti-malaria spray program, our con- tinuing support for a Teranga operated clinic and the supply of a community ambulance. We believe it is the responsibility of all modern mining companies to ensure that their opera- tions provide positive and sustainable social and economic effects, and to communicate this commitment to the communities in their zones of influence. In this sense, this critical self-analysis of our performance will ensure that we always apply Best Available Technolo- gies (BAT) and best management practices. This means constantly reviewing our perfor- mance, and at times readjusting our approach for the best possible long-term results. t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 10 We are committed to our employees and in the growth of each individual through continuous development and skills training, and endeavour to be the employer of choice within Senegal. We firmly believe that our operation can only be as successful as our people and as such we focus on mentorship, and development of a predominantly local workforce. It is for this reason that of the approximately 1,000 people we employ on site at Sabodala, over 90 percent are Senegalese with employment opportunities preferentially offered to people permanently residing within the Kédougou region. t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 11 registrAr AnD trAnsFer Agent canada: computershare trust company of canada 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2Y1 Tel: + 1-800-564-6253 Australia: computershare investor services Pty Ltd. GPO Box 2975, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia Tel: + 1-300-850-505 (investors within Australia) Tel: + 61-3-9415-4000 (investors) sHAre cAPitAL Common Shares Issued and Outstanding 245,618,000 (as at March 31, 2013) stocK excHAnge Listings Toronto Stock Exchange Australian Stock Exchange Symbol: TGZ AnnuAL Meeting The Annual General & Special Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 9:30am, Offices of Stikeman Elliott LLP Main Boardroom 53rd Floor, 199 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario CORPORATE INFORMATION Directors corPorAte HeAD oFFice teranga gold corporation Suite 2600-121 King Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3T9 Tel: + 1-416-594-0000 Fax: + 1-416-594-0088 Email: investor@terangagold.com www.terangagold.com Contact: Kathy sipos Vice President, Investor & Stakeholder Relations Tel: + 1-416-594-0000 Email: ksipos@terangagold.com senegAL oFFice 2K Plaza Suite B4, 1er Etage Sis Route du Méridien Président Dakar Almadies Tel: + 221-338-693-181 Fax: + 221-338-603-683 AuDitor ernst & Young LLP – 2013 Chartered Accountants Toronto, Ontario, Canada Deloitte & touche LLP – 2012 Chartered Accountants Toronto, Ontario, Canada soLicitorsoLicitors stikeman elliott LLP Toronto, Ontario, Canada Alan r. Hill 5 Executive Chairman richard s. Young President and CEO christopher r. Lattanzi 1,3,5 oliver Lennox-King 1,2,4,5 Alan r. thomas 1,2,3,4 Frank D. Wheatley 1,2,3,4 Jeffrey W. Williams *2,5 1. Audit Committee 2. Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee 3. Compensation Committee 4. Finance Committee 5. Technical, Safety, Environmental and Social Responsibility Committee *Appointed April 29, 2013 senior MAnAgeMentsenior MAnMent Alan r. Hill Executive Chairman richard s. Young President and CEO Mark english Vice President, Sabodala Operations Paul chawrun Vice President, Technical Services navin Dyal Vice President and CFO David savarie Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Kathy sipos Vice President, Investor and Stakeholder Relations Macoumba Diop General Manager and Government Relations Manager, SGO This report is printed on Cougar Opaque with 10% post-consumer recycled fibre using SFI-Fibre Sourcing Certification. It is manufactured by Domtar to exacting environmental standards with support by the Rainforest Alliance, WWF-Canada as well as FSC certification. Inks used for the production of this report are printed using Low VOC (low volatile organic compounds). © Copyright 2013 Teranga Gold Corporation Design: Clear Space, clearspace.ca Printing: Exodus Graphics Corp. t e r a n g a g o l d c o r p o r a t i o n 12 FOCUSED ON GROWTH T E R A N G A G O L D C O R P O R A T I O N 2 0 1 2 A N N U A L R E P O R T STRENGTH FINANCIAL PRODUCTION GROWING RESERVES GROWING FOCUSED ON FOCUSED 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt Financial statements inDeX Overview of the Business Financial and Operating Highlights Fourth Quarter and Year-end Results outlook 2013 Review of Financial Results Review of Operating Results Reserves and Resources strategy and market Review Growth Strategy Mine license Reserve Development Regional exploration Health and Safety Market Review cash Flow liquidity and capital Resources Financial instruments contractual Obligations and commitments summary of Quarterly information Risk Factors contingent liabilities critical accounting Policies and estimates change in accounting Policies adoption of new accounting standards non-iFRs Financial measures Outstanding share Data transactions with Related Parties ceO/cFO certification Risks and Uncertainties 2 3 3 5 6 9 11 12 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 18 18 20 20 20 21 23 23 23 24 25 25 25 competent Persons statement 25 1 manaGement’s DiscUssiOn anD analysis For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides a discussion and analysis of the financial conditions and results of op- erations to enable a reader to assess material changes in the financial condition and results of operations as at and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The MD&A should be read in conjunc- tion with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto (“The Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements”) of Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga” or the “Company”) as at and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and MD&A are presented in United States dollars, unless otherwise specified, and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Ac- counting Standards Board (“IASB”). Additional information about Teranga, including the Company’s Annual Information Form for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, as well as all other public filings, is available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold. com and on the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). The Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 is expected to be filed in March 2013. FORWaRD-lOOKinG statements Certain information included in this management’s discussion and analysis, including any information as to the Company’s strategy, projects, exploration programs, joint venture ownership positions, plans, future financial or operating performance and other state- ments that express management’s expectations or estimates of future performance, constitute “ forward-looking statements”. The words “believe”, “expect”, “will”, “ intend”, ”anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “estimate”, “on track” and similar expressions identify forward- looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates, assumptions, opinions and analysis made by management in light of its experience that, while considered reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, in each case that may cause the actual financial results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from the Company’s estimated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. These assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to: as- sumptions regarding general business and economic conditions; condi- tions in financial markets and the future financial performance of the company; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and the level and volatility of the worldwide price of gold or certain other commodities (such as silver, fuel and electricity); fluctuations in currency markets, including changes in U.S. dollar and CFA Franc interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; adverse changes in our credit rating; level of indebtedness and liquidity; ability to successfully complete announced transactions and integrate acquired assets; legislative, political or economic developments in the jurisdictions in which the Company carries on business; operating or technical dif- ficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations; availability and costs associated with mining inputs and la- bour; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses and permits and diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; changes in costs and estimates associated with our projects; the accuracy of our reserve estimates (including size, grade and recoverability) and the geological, operational and price assumptions on which these are based; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; the risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are more fully described in the Company’s prospectus dated November 11, 2010 and in other Company filings with securities and regulatory authorities, which are available at www.sedar.com. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reli- ance on such forward-looking statements. Teranga expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. This report is dated as of February 20, 2013. All references to the Company include its subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise. The MD&A contains references to Teranga using the words “we”, “us”, “our” and similar words and the reader is referred to using the words “you”, “your” and similar words. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt2 OVeRVieW OF tHe BUsiness Teranga is a Canadian-based gold company that operates the Sabodala gold mine and is currently exploring 10 explora- tion licenses covering 1,200km2 in Senegal, comprising the regional land package, surrounding the Sabodala gold mine1. The Sabodala gold mine, the regional land package, and shares held in Oromin Explorations Ltd. (“Oromin”) are col- lectively referred to as the Sabodala Gold Assets. The Sabodala gold mine, which came into operation in 2009, is located 650 kilometres southeast of the capital of Senegal, Dakar within the West African Birimian geological belt in Sen- egal where approximately 10 million ounces of gold resources have been discovered over the past six years, and lies about 90 kilometres from major gold mines in Mali. Management believes that the combination of the Sabodala gold mine and mill and its regional land package, all within trucking distance to the Sabodala mill, provides the basis for growth in reserves and production, resulting in growth in earnings and cash flow per share as new discoveries are made and processed through the Sabodala mill. Our mission is to share the benefits with all of our stake- holders through responsible mining. We strive to act as a responsible corporate citizen by building projects together with the communities near our planned operations and by committing to using best available technologies as we carry out our actions. We aim to achieve benefits for all parties involved, and to contribute to the sustainability and improved livelihoods for the communities in which we operate. Our Vision is to become a pre-eminent gold producer in West Africa while setting the benchmark for responsible mining. Phase 1: Become a mid-tier gold producer in Senegal with 250,000 to 350,000 ounces of annual gold production lever- aging off the Company’s existing mill and infrastructure. Phase 2: Increase annual gold production to 400,000 to 500,000 ounces via a mill expansion as gold inventories increase. Demerger from mineral Deposits limited (“mDl”) (“Demerger”) On November 23, 2010, Teranga completed the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and a regional exploration package by way of a Demerger from MDL. As part of the Demerger certain assets consisting of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited, which holds a 90 percent interest in Sabodala Gold Operations SA (“SGO”), the holder of the Sabodala gold mine, and a 100 percent interest in Sabodala Mining Company SARL (“SMC”), an exploration entity that holds the regional land package; all of the issued and outstanding shares of SGML (Capital) Limited; and 18,699,500 common shares of Oromin Exploration Ltd., originally held by MDL, were transferred to Teranga in con- sideration for the issuance of 200,000,000 common shares of Teranga to MDL (approximately 160,000,000 of such common shares were then in specie distributed to MDL’s shareholders with the remainder retained by MDL) and the assumption of a C$50 million promissory note owing to MDL. Following the completion of the Demerger, the C$50 million promissory note owing to MDL was repaid by Teranga from proceeds of the Initial Public Offering (“IPO”). Basis of Preparation The transfer of the Sabodala Gold Assets into the Company is considered a transaction between entities under common control. As such, the Company has presented its financial results on a continuity-of-interests basis whereby the carrying amounts of the Sabodala Gold Assets reflect those previously reported in the financial statements of MDL. Accordingly, the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 reflects the corporate activities since incorporation of Teranga on October 1, 2010 and the operations of SGO from November 23, 2010. The production statistics in this MD&A reflect operating results for the 2012 and 2011 calendar years. 1 The Company’s 11th exploration permit, Sabodala North West, was not renewed by the Government in June 2012. The Company has since appealed this decision and is awaiting a response from the Government. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis3 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS 2012 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Results (US$000s, except where indicated) Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31 Fifteen months ended December 31 Financial Data Revenue Profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders of Teranga $ per share Operating cash flow Capital expenditures Free cash flow 1 Cash and cash equivalents Net debt 2 Operating Data Gold produced (ounces) Gold sold (ounces) Average realized price ($ per ounce) Total cash costs ($ per ounce sold) 3 Total depreciation and amortization ($ per ounce sold) 3 Total production costs ($ per ounce sold) 3 2012 2011 Current Restated (i) 122,970 48,781 0.20 56,401 25,252 31,149 39,722 80,434 58,026 23,722 0.10 7,466 27,300 (19,834) 7,470 95,748 Three months ended December 31 2012 2011 71,804 71,604 1,296 623 246 869 36,695 34,665 1,482 809 235 1,044 2012 Current 350,520 79,924 0.33 72,447 83,250 (10,803) 39,722 80,434 2012 214,310 207,814 1,422 627 223 850 2011 Restated (i) 236,873 (16,040) (0.07) 5,132 76,392 (71,260) 7,470 95,748 Twelve months ended December 31 2011 131,461 137,136 1,236 782 249 1,031 (i) The Company adopted changes to certain accounting policies effective January 1, 2012 that have been retrospectively applied to the three and fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. See “Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 – Change in Accounting Policies”. 1 Free cash flow is defined as operating cash flow less capital expenditures. 2 Net debt is defined as total borrowings and total financial derivative liabilities less cash and cash equivalent. 3 Total cash costs per ounce, total depreciation and amortization per ounce and total production cost per ounce are non-IFRS financial measures with standard meaning under IFRS. For definitions of these metrics, please see page 23 of this report. FOURTH QUARTER FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS • Gold revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was $123.0 million compared to $58.0 million in the same prior-year period. The increase in gold revenue was mainly driven by higher gold sales. Revenues exclude the impact of realized losses on ounces delivered into forward sales contracts, which are classified within losses on gold hedge contracts. • Consolidated profit for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was $48.8 million ($0.20 per share), or 106 percent higher than the same prior-year period. The increase in profit and earnings per share were primarily due to an increase in gross profit from a 112 percent increase in revenues. • Operating cash flow for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was $56.4 million, an increase of $48.9 million over the same prior-year period. Operat- ing cash flow in the fourth quarter 2012 was positively impacted by higher gold sales. • Capital expenditures were $25.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, $2.0 million lower than the same prior-year period mainly due to higher expendi- tures in 2011 related to the mill expansion, which was com- missioned in third quarter 2012, partially offset by higher reserve development expenditures in 2012. • Gold production for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was 71,804 ounces, 96 percent higher than the same prior-year period due to the processing of higher grade ore combined with higher mill throughput as a result of the completion of the mill expansion. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt4 • Gold sold for the three months ended December 31, 2012 totalled 71,604 ounces compared to 34,665 ounces sold in the same prior-year period, an increase of 107 percent. Ounces sold during the fourth quarter of 2012 were in line with production for the period. At December 31, 2012, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory amounted to 13,221 ounces. • Total cash costs for the three months ended December 31, 2012 were $623 per ounce sold compared to $809 per ounce in the same prior-year period, a reduction of 23 percent. The decrease in total cash costs per ounce was mainly due to higher gold ounces produced, partially offset by higher mining and processing costs. • Total production costs per ounce, comprised of total cash costs and depreciation and amortization, were $869 per ounce in the fourth quarter 2012 compared to $1,044 per ounce in the same prior-year period. • During the fourth quarter 2012, the average realized gold price was $1,296 per ounce with 33,606 ounces delivered into gold hedge contracts at an average price of $833 per ounce and 37,998 ounces sold at an average spot price of $1,705 per ounce. During the same prior-year period, the average realized gold price was $1,482 per ounce with 7,385 ounces delivered into gold hedge contracts at $846 per ounce and 27,280 ounces sold into the spot market at an average spot price of $1,654 per ounce. • The gold forward sales contracts declined during the fourth quarter 2012 to 59,789 ounces at December 31, 2012. Forward sales contracts have declined by an additional 21,684 ounces to 38,105 ounces at January 29, 2013 and are scheduled to be fully extinguished by June 2013. In total, forward sales contracts outstanding have declined by 136,395 ounces since December 31, 2011. partly offset by a non-cash impairment charge recorded in 2012, related to an available for sale financial asset. • Operating cash flow for the twelve months ended Decem- ber 31, 2012 was $72.4 million compared to $5.1 million during the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. Operating cash flows in 2012 benefitted from an increase in gross profit and lower regional exploration expenditures. • Capital expenditures for 2012, excluding reserve develop- ment expenditures, were $52.9 million, higher than the re- vised guidance of $50 million, and $9.2 million lower than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. Capitalized reserve development costs for the year were $30.4 million, higher than the revised guidance of $25 million, and $16.0 million higher than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The increase over 2011 was the result of a focus on expanding resources within the Sabodala pit and converting resources to reserves. • Gold production for the year was within guidance of 210,000–225,000 ounces, at 214,310 ounces, 63 percent higher than the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 due to higher grade ore processed. • Gold sold for the year was 207,814 ounces, an increase of 52 percent over the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. Ounces sold during 2012 were lower than produced due to an increase in gold in circuit and gold bullion inven- tory of 6,496 ounces to 13,221 ounces. • Total cash costs for 2012 were within guidance of $600–$650 per ounce, at $627 per ounce sold compared to $782 per ounce for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, a reduction of 20 percent. The decrease in cash costs was mainly due to higher ounces produced. Full-year Financial and Operating Highlights • Total production costs, comprised of total cash costs and • Gold revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $350.5 million compared to gold revenue of $236.9 million for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The increase in gold revenue was driven by higher gold sales and spot gold prices. Revenues exclude the impact of realized losses on ounces delivered into forward sales contracts, which are classified within losses on gold hedge contracts. • Consolidated profit for 2012 was $79.9 million ($0.33 per share) up from a loss of $16.0 million ($0.07 loss per share) during the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The increase in profit was primarily due to an in- crease in gross profit from higher revenues, lower regional exploration expenditures and lower gold hedge losses, total depreciation and amortization, for the year were $850 per ounce sold, down from $1,031 per ounce sold for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. • Realized gold price for 2012 was $1,422 per ounce sold compared to $1,236 per ounce sold for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The higher realized gold price for 2012 reflects a lower percentage of gold delivered into forward sales contracts due to the buyback of 52,105 ounces during the second quarter of 2012, as well as higher gold prices in 2012. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysisOUtlOOK 2013 year ended December 31 Operating results ore mined Waste mined total mined Grade mined Strip ratio ore milled Head grade Recovery rate Gold produced Gold sold total cash cost (incl. royalties) 1, 2 total production cost1 Mining (cost/t mined) Milling (cost/t milled) G&A (cost/t milled) mine production costs capital expenditures Mine site Capitalized reserve development Gora development costs Mobile equipment Site development total Gora development costs Capitalized deferred stripping 2 total capital expenditures exploration (expensed) administration expense Hedge close-outs / deliveries (000t) (000t) (000t) (g/t) waste/ore (000t) (g/t) % (oz) (oz) $/oz sold $/oz sold $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions $ millions (oz) 5 2013 Guidance Range 4,000 – 4,500 31,000 – 32,000 35,000 – 36,500 1.40 – 1.60 7.00 – 7.75 3,300 – 3,400 2.00 – 2.15 89.0 – 91.0 190,000 – 210,000 190,000 – 210,000 650 – 700 950 – 1,000 2.50 – 2.70 19.00 – 20.00 5.00 – 6.00 170.0 – 180.0 20.0 5.0 – – 25.0 10.0 30.0 – 35.0 15.0 45.0 – – 20.0 50.0 35.0 – 40.0 105.0 – 125.0 10.0 – 15.0 15.0 – 20.0 2012 actuals 5,915 22,962 28,877 1.98 3.88 2,439 3.08 88.7 214,310 207,814 627 850 2.71 20.39 6.16 145.8 52.9 26.1 – 4.3 4.3 n/a 83.3 16.7 17.9 136,395 59,789 1 Total cash cost per ounce and total production cost per ounce are non- IFRS financial measures with no standard meaning under IFRS. For definitions of these metrics, please see page 23 of this report. 2 For 2013, reflects the impact of adoption of a new IFRS standard for deferred stripping. Please see page 23 of this report. material assumptions Material assumptions or factors used to forecast production and costs include: • Gold price: $1,600 per ounce • Exchange rates: o $1.05USD: $1AUD o $1USD: 0.002 West African Franc (XOF) o $1.30USD: €1.00 • Fuel prices: o Light fuel oil: $1.10/litre o Heavy fuel oil: $1.05/litre Other important assumptions include the following: Any politi- cal events are not expected to impact operations, including movement of people, supplies and gold shipments; grades and recoveries will remain consistent with the life-of-mine plan to achieve the forecast gold production; no unplanned delays in or interruption of scheduled production from Sabodala mine; and availability of mining equipment due to overruns on scheduled major component replacements planned for the year. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt6 sensitiVity Gold revenue Gold total cash costs: Gold price effect on royalties 1 Brent crude oil price euR exchange rate 2013 assumption Hypothetical change impact on total cash costs impact on profit $1,600/oz $100/oz n/a $20M $1,600/oz $100/bbl 1.3:1 $100/oz $10/bbl 10% $3/oz $27/oz $47/oz $0.6M $4.8M $9.7M 1 Assumes a 3% royalty payable to the Senegalese government. ReVieW OF Financial ResUlts (Us$000s) Revenue Cost of sales exploration and evaluation expenditures Administration expenses Share-based compensation Finance costs losses on gold hedge contracts Gains/(losses) on oil hedge contracts net foreign exchange (losses)/gains Impairment of available for sale financial asset other income Profit/(loss) before income tax Income tax benefit Profit/(loss) for the period profit/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest Profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders of teranga Basic earnings/(losses) per share Revenue twelve months ended December 31 Fifteen months ended December 31 2012 current 350,520 (179,323 ) 171,197 (16,657) (17,931 ) (4,694 ) (7,789) (15,274 ) (427 ) (2,574) (11,917) 36 93,970 115 94,085 14,161 79,924 0.33 2011 Restated (i) 236,873 (148,812) 88,061 (31,659) (13,448 ) (12,411) (2,946) (47,943) 2,203 4,486 – 848 (12,809) 92 (12,717) 3,323 (16,040) (0.07) Gold revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $350.5 million compared to gold revenue of $236.9 million for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The increase in gold revenue was driven by higher gold sales and spot gold prices. Revenues exclude the impact of realized losses on ounces delivered into forward sales contracts, which are classified within losses on gold hedge contracts. cOst OF sales (Us$000s) Mine production costs Depreciation and amortization Royalties Rehabilitation Inventory movements total cost of sales twelve months ended December 31 Fifteen months ended December 31 2012 current 145,831 52,660 10,491 36 (29,695) 179,323 2011 Restated (i) 126,125 40,077 7,035 9 (24,434) 148,812 (i) The Company adopted changes to certain accounting policies effective January 1, 2012 that have been retrospectively applied to the three and fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. See “Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 – Change in Accounting Policies”. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis(Us$000s) Revenue Cost of sales exploration and evaluation expenditures Administration expenses Share-based compensation Finance costs losses on gold hedge contracts Gains/(losses) on oil hedge contracts net foreign exchange (losses)/gains Impairment of available for sale financial asset other income Profit/(loss) before income tax Income tax benefit Profit/(loss) for the period profit/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest Profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders of teranga Basic earnings/(losses) per share (Us$000s) Mine production costs Depreciation and amortization Royalties Rehabilitation Inventory movements total cost of sales twelve months Fifteen months ended December 31 ended December 31 2012 current 350,520 (179,323 ) 171,197 (16,657) (17,931 ) (4,694 ) (7,789) (15,274 ) (427 ) (2,574) (11,917) 36 93,970 115 94,085 14,161 79,924 0.33 2012 current 145,831 52,660 10,491 36 (29,695) 179,323 2011 Restated (i) 236,873 (148,812) 88,061 (31,659) (13,448 ) (12,411) (2,946) (47,943) 2,203 4,486 – 848 (12,809) 92 (12,717) 3,323 (16,040) (0.07) 2011 Restated (i) 126,125 40,077 7,035 9 (24,434) 148,812 twelve months Fifteen months ended December 31 ended December 31 7 Cost of sales for 2012 totalled $179.3 million and consists of mine production costs, depreciation and amortization, royalties, rehabilitation costs and inventory movement costs. This compares with cost of sales for the fifteen months ended 2011 of $148.8 million. Mine production costs for 2012 totalled $145.8 million compared with $126.1 million for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. Higher mine production costs were due to higher mining and processing activity. Total mine site cash production costs for 2013 are expected to rise by between $30 million and $35 million compared to 2012 due to an increase in mining (up 24 percent) and processing (up 37 percent) rates as detailed in the Review of Operating Results section of this report. However, reported total cash costs for 2013 are expected to rise marginally to between $650 and $700 per ounce sold due to the adoption of a new accounting standard for deferred stripping (IFRIC 20) that results in approximately $75 to $100 per ounce being capitalized to deferred stripping net of inventory movement costs. Depreciation and amortization for the year totalled $52.7 million compared with $40.1 million for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. On a gross cost basis, de- preciation was higher in 2012 due to higher gold sales as many of the Company’s fixed assets are depreciated using the units of production method of depreciation. In addition, deprecia- tion was higher in fourth quarter 2012 with the commission- ing of the plant expansion in third quarter 2012. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2013 are expected to increase to between $65 million and $70 million due to the additional mobile equipment and added depreciation associated with the mill expansion and deferred stripping. Royalties for the year totalled $10.5 million, $3.5 million higher than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, mainly due to higher gold sales. Royalties are calculated based on 3 percent of the average spot price of gold for the period rather than the average price realized by the Company. Inventory movements for 2012 resulted in a reduction to cost of sales of $29.7 million compared to $24.4 million for the 15 months ended December 31, 2011, mainly due to higher ounces mined than processed. During 2012, the Company mined 376,185 ounces compared to 214,310 ounces pro- duced. exploration and evaluation Exploration and evaluation expenditures for 2012 totalled $16.7 million, $15.0 million lower than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, reflecting regional exploration costs incurred during the year related to drill programs as well as target identification work. The higher costs in 2011 reflect reserve definition drilling at the Gora deposit completed in early 2012. Exploration and evaluation expenditures were lower than the plan of $20 million as Management refocused its efforts on the expansion and conversion of resources to reserves within the Mine License in fourth quarter 2012. Exploration expenses for 2013 are expected to decrease compared to 2012. The largest cost item continues to be drilling, which includes diamond (“DD”), reverse circulation (“RC”), and rotary air blasting (“RAB”). The plans for the regional exploration program are outlined below in “Strat- egy and Market Review”. If a discovery is made, exploration expenditures may rise above the planned amount. administration Administration expenses for 2012, which includes costs of the corporate and Dakar offices as well as community and social responsibility costs (“CSR”), were $17.9 million, $4.5 million higher than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The higher costs in 2012 reflect the buildup of the corporate office, higher legal costs and ongoing CSR activities. In 2013, the Company expects to maintain similar levels of expenditure, with the majority of the costs being budgeted for the Toronto and Dakar offices relating to employee costs, which will include the new Technical Services department, legal and accounting, while the remainder is allocated for corporate social responsi- bility costs. share-Based compensation During 2012, a total of 3,580,000 common share stock options were granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants, all at an exercise price of $3.00, and 4,058,055 common share stock options were cancelled. No stock op- tions were exercised during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012. The estimated fair value of stock options is amortized over the period in which the options vest which is normally three years; however, under IFRS the accelerated method of amortization is applied to stock-based compensa- tion which results in about 70 percent of the cost of the stock options being expensed in the first year of grant, 25 percent in the second year and 5 percent in the third year. For those options that vest on single or multiple dates, either upon issu- ance or upon meeting milestones (the “measurement date”), the entire fair value of the vesting options is recognized im- mediately on the measurement date. Of the 17,139,167 common share stock options issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2012; 16,964,167 shares vest over a three-year period and 175,000 shares vest based on achievement of certain milestones. The fair value of options that vest upon achievement of milestones will be recognized based on our best estimate of outcome of achiev- ing our results. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt8 Management continuously refines employee compensation packages to ensure that the Company is able to hire and retain the best employees available. In the third quarter 2012, the Company introduced a new Fixed Bonus Plan to further augment the Company’s compensation package to provide improved compensation flexibility to be able to hire and retain the best employees. The Fixed Bonus Plan Units issued un- der this plan are not convertible into Company stock and are simply redeemed by way of cash payment by the Company. September 30, 2010; however, the gold hedge contracts still remained in place. In the second quarter 2012, proceeds of $60 million were received from Macquarie Bank Limited by way of an amendment to the existing Project Finance Facility, a portion of which was used to settle 52,105 ounces of hedge contracts scheduled for delivery in 2012. This loan is repayable on or before June 30, 2014. The obligations under the hedge contracts are expected to be extinguished by June 2013 or earlier if the Company chooses to accelerate deliveries. During 2012, a total of 1,440,000 Fixed Bonus Plan Units, at an exercise price of $3.00 per unit, were granted to employ- ees. No Fixed Bonus Plan Units were forfeited or exercised during the period. Fixed Bonus Plan Units granted are fair valued at the end of each reporting period using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. Finance costs Finance costs for 2012 of $7.8 million reflect interest costs related to the outstanding bank and mobile equipment loans, amortization of capitalized borrowing costs, political risk insurance relating to the project finance facility and bank charges. Finance costs were higher than the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 due to higher debt balances and higher interest costs on borrowings. Finance costs for 2013 are expected to be comparable to 2012. Gold Hedge contracts The loss on gold hedge contracts totalled $15.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 resulted from an increase in the spot price of gold from December 31, 2011 by $108 per ounce of gold. The total mark-to-market loss of the remaining 59,789 ounces of gold under gold hedge con- tracts recorded as a financial derivative liability decreased to $51.5 million due to the reduction in forward sales contracts outstanding by 114,711 ounces during 2012. The average forward price of the remaining contracts of $803 per ounce is marked to the year-end spot price of $1,664 per ounce. If deliveries are not accelerated, the forward sales contracts are expected to be extinguished by June 2013. The hedge contracts were required as part of the project finance facility with Macquarie Bank Limited (the “Project Finance Facility”) that was put in place to construct the Sabo- dala mine. The Project Finance Facility was initially repaid on Oil Hedge contracts The loss on oil hedge contracts totalled $0.4 million for 2012 resulted from a decrease of $7 per barrel over the December 31, 2011 spot price of oil. The overall mark-to- market of the remaining barrels of fuel oil outstanding at a hedge price of $70 per barrel decreased due to the delivery of 80,000 barrels during 2012, reducing the number of bar- rels outstanding at year-end to 20,000 barrels. The financial derivative asset of the remaining 20,000 barrels totalled $0.5 million at December 31, 2012 at a spot price of $92 per barrel. The Company’s oil hedge contracts are based on the West Texas Intermediate spot oil price; however, site fuel costs are based on the Brent crude spot oil price. Our oil hedges were less effective throughout 2012 because of a difference between the two exchanges. The Company may consider entering into new oil hedge contracts, if Management deems the terms appropriate to reduce exposure to crude oil price volatility. net Foreign exchange Gains and losses The Company generated foreign exchange losses of $2.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 primarily related to realized losses from the Sabodala gold mine operating costs recorded in the local currency and translated into the U.S. dollar functional currency. impairment of available for sale Financial asset As of June 30, 2012 Oromin’s share price traded 56 percent lower than the share price at the date of acquisition and 52 percent lower than at the beginning of the year. As a result of the continuous decline in the share price, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment loss of $11.9 million on the Oromin shares during the second quarter 2012. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysisReVieW OF OPeRatinG ResUlts Operating results ore mined Waste mined total mined Grade mined ounces mined Strip ratio ore milled Head grade Recovery rate Gold produced 1 Gold sold Average price received (’000t) (’000t) (’000t) (g/t) (oz) waste/ore (’000t) (g/t) % (oz) (oz) $/oz total cash cost (incl. royalties) 2 $/oz sold Mining (cost/t mined) Milling (cost/t milled) G&A (cost/t milled) three months ended December 31 2012 2011 2012 2,038 5,274 7,312 2.04 Restated (i) 1,715 4,736 6,451 1.50 5,915 22,962 28,877 1.98 133,549 82,710 376,185 2.6 725 3.40 90.7 71,804 71,604 1,296 623 3.1 19.9 6.4 2.8 604 2.10 89.8 36,695 34,665 1,482 809 2.5 17.3 6.2 3.9 2,439 3.08 88.7 214,310 207,814 1,422 627 2.7 20.4 6.2 9 twelve months ended December 31 2011 Restated (i) 3,973 21,818 25,791 1.39 177,362 5.5 2,444 1.87 89.5 131,461 137,136 1,236 782 2.3 16.8 5.8 (i) The Company adopted changes to certain accounting policies effective January 1, 2012 that have been retrospectively applied to the three and fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. See “Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 – Change in Accounting Policies” 1 Gold produced represents change in gold in circuit inventory plus gold recovered during the period. 2 Cash cost per ounce is a non-IFRS financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Total tonnes mined for the three months ended December 31, 2012 were 13 percent higher compared to the same prior-year period due to increased fleet capacity and improved productivity in the mining operation. Total tonnes mined for 2012 were 12 percent higher than the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 and 4 percent higher than planned. Ore tonnes mined were lower than plan but at better grades resulting in similar ounces mined com- pared to plan. In estimating 2011 year-end reserves, Manage- ment lowered the capping level on high-grade intersections, resulting in an underestimation of grade in this area of the ore body. In addition, better dilution control in the pit led to better grades mined than plan. Drilling and loading availabilities in 2012 benefited from the addition of three new blast hole drill rigs, four new haul trucks, and the implementation of better maintenance practices, resulting in improved loading and hauling efficiencies from improved availability of the mobile equipment fleet. Ore tonnes mined in 2013 will primarily come from mining of Phases 2 and 3 of the Sabodala pit. Mining rates are ex- pected to increase in 2013 with the addition of five new haul trucks and one shovel. Two of the new haul trucks arrived in late 2012 and were commissioned in early January 2013, while the balance of three trucks and the shovel are expected to be commissioned in the second quarter of 2013. The ad- ditional mobile equipment is expected to maintain a 200,000 ounce production level from the Sabodala Mine License. Unit mining costs for 2012 were higher than plan and higher compared to the prior year periods mainly due to higher fuel consumption from longer haul distances and higher costs for blasting consumables. Unit mining costs for 2013 are expected to be comparable to 2012. Higher consumption of blasting consumables enabling better fragmentation for pro- cessing is expected to be offset by shorter hauling distances from mining in Phase 3 which is at a higher elevation in the Sabodala pit. Gross mining costs are expected to increase with the ad- ditional mobile equipment expected to be commissioned in the first and second quarters of 2013 to facilitate higher mining rates. During the third and fourth quarters of 2012, the Company experienced delays in the delivery of tires, which negatively impacted waste stripping activities in Phase 3 of the Sabodala pit. The Company has since entered into negotiations with new tire suppliers to mitigate any further supply disruptions. Management believes that the addition of new suppliers should ensure that mining activities in 2013 are not impacted; however, tire costs are increasing. Ore tonnes milled for the three months ended December 31, 2012 were 20 percent higher than the same prior-year period mainly due to an increase in mill capacity as a result of the completion of the mill expansion. Mill throughput for the fourth quarter was lower than plan due to the ramp-up and optimization of the new crushing circuit, which was part of the mill expansion, as well as higher than expected wear rates in transfer chutes and feeders in the crushing circuit. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt10 The majority of these issues were rectified during a comprehensive planned shutdown in January 2013. Mill throughput for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was similar to the same prior year period, as an increase in the milling capacity with the completion of the mill expansion in the third quarter 2012 was offset by lower throughput rates from harder ore processed in 2012 com- pared to the softer material that was available in 2011. Com- pared to budget, mill throughput for 2012 was approximately 20 percent lower than plan due to delays in commissioning the crushing circuit as part of the mill expansion. Transfer chute design upgrades and the addition of more durable liners in the high-wear points through the plant are planned for 2013. These changes are anticipated to help reduce the frequency and duration of unplanned downtime allowing the design targets to be achieved. Unit processing costs for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012 were 21 percent higher than the same prior-year period due to processing of harder ore, which led to higher consumption of heavy fuel oil (“HFO”) used for power generation, higher costs and consumption of grinding media, and higher costs for reagents, partly offset by lower HFO prices. Unit processing costs in 2013 are expected to decrease slightly to between $19 and $20 per tonne benefit- ing from the expansion of the mill, but will also be negatively impacted by higher consumption of reagents and grinding media due to harder ore milled. Unit general and administration costs for 2012 are compara- ble to the same prior-year period. Unit general and admin- istrative costs in 2013 are expected to decline with higher tonnes processed. Gold production for the year was within guidance of 210,000–225,000 ounces, at 214,310 ounces, 63 percent higher than the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 due to higher grade ore processed. The mined grade in 2012 was 1.98 gpt compared to 1.39 gpt in the same prior-year period, while processed grade in 2012 was 3.08 gpt versus 1.87 gpt during the twelve months ended 2011. As with any open pit operation, the mining rate exceeds the processing rate to ensure adequate ore feed at all times. As a result, the highest grade material is processed and the lower grade ma- terial is stockpiled for processing later in the mine life. Gold production for 2013 is expected to total between 190,000 to 210,000 ounces.5 Higher throughput from the expansion of the mill during 2012 is expected to partially offset lower grades processed in 2013. Teranga has stated objectives of reaching mid-tier producer status in the near term with annual gold production of 250,000 to 350,000 ounces and establishing a 200,000 ounce annual production base at Sabodala is crucial in this growth strategy.6 5 This production target is based on proven and probable reserves only. 6 This production target is based on proven and probable reserves only. During the year, 62,606 ounces were delivered into forward sales contracts at an average price of $832 per ounce, repre- senting 30 percent of gold sales for the year. 145,208 ounces of gold were sold into the spot market at an average price of $1,677 per ounce resulting in an average realized price for the year of $1,422 per ounce. During the same prior-year pe- riod, 137,136 ounces were sold at an average realized price of $1,236 per ounce with 61,000 ounces delivered into forward sales contracts at $846 per ounce representing 44 percent of gold sales for the period and 76,136 ounces sold at an average spot price of $1,548 per ounce. The lower percentage of gold sales into forward sales contracts in 2012 was due to the buyback of 52,105 ounces of forward sales contracts due for delivery in 2012 as part of a $60 million two-year Loan Facility with Macquarie Bank Limited. As of December 31, 2012, 59,789 ounces remain to be delivered into forward sales contracts at an average price of $803 per ounce. Total cash costs for the three months ended December 31, 2012 were $44.6 million compared to $28.0 million in the same prior-year period. Total cash costs for the three months ended December 31, 2012 were $623 per ounce sold compared to $809 per ounce in the same prior-year period, a reduction of 23 percent. The decrease in total cash costs per ounce was mainly due to higher gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher mining and processing costs. Total cash costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 were $130.3 million or 22 percent higher than the same prior-year period due to higher mine production costs and higher royalties. On a per ounce sold basis for the fiscal year, total cash costs were in line with guidance at $627 per ounce sold compared to $782 per ounce for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. This reduction of 22 percent was mainly due to higher processed grades. Beginning in 2013, the Company will report cash costs, adjusted for the adoption of a new mandatory IFRS standard (IFRIC 20) for capitaliza- tion of a portion of production phase stripping costs when certain benefits accrue to the Company from the stripping activity. Total mine site cash production costs for 2013 are expected to rise by between $30 million and $35 million compared to 2012 due to an increase in mining (up 24 per- cent) and processing (up 37 percent) rates. However, report- ed total cash costs for 2013 are expected to rise marginally to between $650 and $700 per ounce sold mainly due to lower ore grades, mitigated by the adoption of IFRIC 20 that result in approximately $75 to $100 per ounce being capitalized to deferred stripping net of inventory movement costs. Total production cost per ounce, including total cash costs and depreciation and amortization, were $850 per ounce sold compared to $1,031 per ounce for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, a reduction of 18 percent primarily due to higher gold sales. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements11 ReseRVes anD ResOURces The proven and probable mineral reserves for the Sabodala and Niakafiri deposits were based on the Measured and Indi- cated resources that fall within the designed pits. The bases for the reserves are consistent with the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) report. The design for the open pit limits, related phasing and long-term planning for the Sabodala open pit were updated from assay and drilling results as at August 20, 2012. Up- dated resource block models were completed for Sabodala and Gora deposits. The updated Sabodala pit design is larger than the 2011 design. The new design uses similar geotechnical parameters as in past designs and uses a slightly higher gold price for the Lerchs-Grossman (“LG”) pit optimization routine to reflect the three-year trailing average gold price. Mining phases were designed similarly to the previous designs, where the mine sequencing is based on accessing the high-grade MFE through successive phases to balance waste stripping and optimize cash flow. The updated Gora pit design and reserve estimate was based on the LG pit optimizer and geotechnical pit wall assumptions similar to the Sabodala pit; however, a higher cut-off was used to reflect the ore haul to Sabodala. Dilution and ore re- covery estimates were based on an estimated minimum mine width of 4 metres with separability optimized for 5 metre benches in ore and 10 metres benches in waste. The Niakafiri pit design remains unchanged from 2011. The total proven and probable mineral reserves at December 31, 2012 are set forth in Table 2 below, and are based on a $1,500 gold price. table 1: Resources estimate Sabodala Sutuba niakafiri Gora total measured indicated measured and indicated tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) 28.06 1.24 – 0.30 0.49 28.85 – 1.74 5.27 1.32 au (Moz) 1.12 – 0.02 0.08 1.22 tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) 31.47 0.50 10.50 1.84 44.31 0.96 1.27 1.10 4.93 1.16 au (Moz) 0.97 0.02 0.37 0.29 1.65 tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) 59.53 0.50 10.70 2.32 73.05 1.09 1.27 1.12 5.00 1.22 au (Moz) 2.09 0.02 0.39 0.37 2.87 inferred mineral Resources tonnes (mt) Grade (g/t) au (moz ) Sabodala Niakafiri Niakafiri West Soukhoto Gora Diadiako Majiva Masato total table 2: Reserves estimate Sabodala Sutuba niakafiri Gora Stockpiles total 12.36 7.20 7.10 0.60 0.21 2.90 2.60 19.18 52.15 0.87 0.88 0.82 1.32 3.38 1.27 0.64 1.15 1.00 0.35 0.21 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.05 0.71 1.67 Proven Probable Proven and Probable tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) au (Moz) tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t) au (Moz) 1.5 0.315 11.07 1.24 0.443 6.55 – 0.23 0.57 7.32 14.67 – 1.69 4.07 1.02 1.36 – 0.013 0.074 0.24 0.642 0.37 7.58 1.53 – 1.40 0.017 1.12 0.274 4.27 0.21 – – 20.56 1.43 0.944 35.23 tonnes (Mt) 17.62 0.37 7.81 2.1 7.32 Grade (g/t) 1.34 1.40 au (Moz) 0.758 0.017 1.14 0.287 4.22 0.284 1.02 1.40 0.24 1.586 1 CIM definitions were used for Mineral Reserves. 2 Mineral Reserve cutoff grades for Niakafiri are 0.35 g/t Au for oxide and 0.50 g/t Au for fresh. 4 Gold price of US$1,500 per ounce used. 5 Proven include stockpiles, which total 7.32 Mt at 1.02 g/t Au for 0.24 Mozs. 6 Sum of individual amounts may not equal the total due to rounding. 3 Mineral Reserve cutoff grade for Sabodala, Sutuba and Gora is 0.50 g/t Au. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 12 The technical information contained in this Report relating to the mineral reserve estimates within the Sabodala, Sutuba, Niakafiri and Gora deposits and the Stockpiles is based on information compiled by Julia Martin, P.Eng., MAusIMM (CP), a full-time employee with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., is independent of Teranga, is a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101 and a “competent person” as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Martin has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Martin has reviewed and accepts responsibility for the reserve estimates disclosed above. Ms. Martin has consented to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. The technical information contained in this Report relating to the mineral resources is based on information compiled by Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie, who is a Member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie is full- time employee of Teranga and is not “ independent” within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie is a “Qualified Person” under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and she consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. The technical information contained in this Report relating to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr. Martin Pawlitschek, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr. Pawlitschek is a consultant of Teranga and is not “ independent” within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Pawlitschek has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Pawlitschek is a “Qualified Person” in accordance with NI 43-101 and he consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. stRateGy anD maRKet ReVieW GROWtH stRateGy The Company has outlined a two-stage growth plan. Phase 1: Become a mid-tier gold producer in Senegal with 250,000 to 350,000 ounces of annual gold production lever- aging off the Company’s existing mill and infrastructure. Phase 2: Increase annual gold production to 400,000 to 500,000 ounces via a mill expansion as gold inventories increase. The Company’s objective is to increase reserves and produc- tion, which in turn should increase earnings and cash flow per share, through both internal exploration discoveries and strategic acquisitions. The Company has and will continue to devote significant resources to exploring its land package with a view of leveraging the existing mill and infrastructure, which was recently expanded from a nominal capacity of 2 million tonnes per annum (“Mtpa”) to approximately 4Mtpa. The Company expects to produce between 190,000 to 210,000 ounces in 2013, confirming the 200,000 ounce production base crucial to the Company’s growth trajectory.4 In the third quarter of 2012, the Company added depth to its management team to focus on growth. Alan Hill was appointed Executive Chairman, formerly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Richard Young was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, formerly President and Chief Financial Officer. Mark English was also promoted to Vice President, Sabodala Operations, formerly Manager, Sabodala Gold Operations. In addition, Navin Dyal and Paul Chawrun were appointed Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Technical Services, respectively. A Technical Services team has been established at the corpo- rate office in Toronto to focus on optimizing strategic growth initiatives and to provide technical support to our operations. Technical support for the growth initiatives includes resource modelling for existing mine licence (“ML”) prospects including the Sabodala pit, strategic optimization of the regional land package, engineering support for potential project develop- ment, evaluating merger and acquisition (“M&A”) targets and corporate reporting for resources and reserves. Technical support for our existing operations includes engi- neering and geology for the development of the Gora project, continual improvement initiatives at our operations and tech- nical support for site-specific projects. Gora Development At the Gora deposit, a combination of receipt of final assays, re-modelling and application of geo-statistics resulted in an increase in the Measured and Indicated Resources to 374,000 ounces of gold at 5.0 gpt. Technical and environ- mental work continued during 2012 and has progressed to initiate the permitting process in the first quarter of 2013. Gora is planned to be operated as a satellite to the Sabo- dala mine with limited local infrastructure and development. Ore will be hauled to the Sabodala processing plant by a dedicated fleet of trucks and processed on a priority basis, displacing Sabodala feed as required. Mining by open pit methods will produce approximately 500,000 tonnes of ore per year for four years, with a grade ranging from 2.8 gpt to 4.9 gpt with an average mined feed grade of 4.22 gpt gold, for a total mineral reserve of 285,000 ounces of gold.5 Metallurgical testing has revealed that Gora ore has similar properties to the Sabodala ore body and therefore blending will not impact overall gold recovery. A series of environmental and pre-development technical studies as well as local consultation have been undertaken to support the development proposal. 4 This production target is based on proven and probable reserves only. Based on existing proven and probable reserves, this annual production rate would equate to an approximate 8-year mine life. 5 This production target is based on existing proven and probable reserves only. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis 13 The project capital cost is estimated to be $45 million to $50 million. The primary cost is the purchase of the mobile equipment fleet, which will be utilized as part of Teranga’s long-term mine plan upon completion of Gora. Additional costs include installation of the required infrastructure and project execution costs. Total cash costs for Gora are estimated to average $675 to $700 per ounce sold on a life-of-mine basis. The Project economics based on the proposed operating scenario and a discount rate of 5 percent return an after-tax net present value (“NPV 5 percent”) of $105 million and an internal rate return (“IRR”) of 69 percent.6 mine license (“ml”) ReseRVe DeVelOPment The Sabodala Mine License covers 33km2 and, in addition to the mine-related infrastructure, contains the Sabodala, Masato, Niakafiri, Niakafiri West, Soukhoto and Dinkokhono deposits. Total reserves as of December 31, 2012 on the ML were 33.13 million tonnes at 1.22 gpt totalling 1.30 million ounces, a decrease of 235,000 ounces or 15 percent. Since the updated reserves reflect drill assay results through August 2012, all drill results after August 20, 2012 will be included in an updated reserve in 2013. As at August 20, 2012, Measured and Indicated Resources at Sabodala increased by approximately 0.7 million ounces to 2.1 million ounces, a 43 percent increase over Measured and Indicated Resources as at December 31, 2011, before production. Drilling in 2012 successfully extended the Masato mineralized limits to the south and down dip onto Teranga’s ML defining approximately 700,000 ounces of Inferred Resource. The overall objective of the ML exploration program is to extend the life of mine, at a production rate of approximately 200,000 ounces per year at grades between 1.5 and 2.0 gpt, to the year 2020 to 2025, which would result in a 10 to 15 year mine life since the IPO in 2010.7 While we had tar- geted to reach this reserve level by mid-2013, based on our exploration results in 2012 and the plan to drill more of our high-potential areas on the ML in 2013, it will likely require at least another year to extend the mine life to at least 2020 and beyond at current production rates. In 2012, we drilled 104,400 metres at a cost of $26 million on the ML. The original ML budget was $20 million for 2012 but was expanded during the year to follow up on positive drill results at Sabodala. sabodala – main Flat extension (“mFe”) / lower Flat Zone (“lFZ”) The Sabodala pit optimization work completed in the first quarter of 2012, based on the high-grade drill results from the fourth quarter of 2011, defined a projected pit shell that included the LFZ at depth. More than 75,000 metres of drill- ing was completed at Sabodala in 2012 to define this section of the ore body. Drilling targeted the MFE immediately adjacent to the current ultimate pit, as well as the LFZ located below and to the north of the MFE, confirming the continuation of these zones. The targeted zones are positioned between 250 metres and 450 metres below the surface. The MFE and LFZ remain open down plunge and to the northwest. The MFE down dip to the SW and SE of the existing open pit operations at Sabodala was also successfully drilled in 2012. These targets range from 60 metres to 250 metres below the surface and are open down dip. Drilling is currently underway from within the pit to test the MFE as it dips to the north and in more shallow areas along the perimeter to the west and east of the current pit. If the mineralization in the extended areas of the known MFE is not sufficient to support the economics of a larger pit, a separate underground analysis will be undertaken in 2013 on the LFZ where a majority of the increase in Measured and Indicated Resources were defined in the September 1, 2012 update. Waste dump condemnation drilling to the SE of the Sabodala open pit encountered a zone of mineralization within the general trend of the NW Shear projected to the SE near to the base of Sambaya Hill. Drilling late in the year targeted this area and results are pending. The 2013 drill program for Sabodala is expected to be com- pleted in the first quarter of 2013. At that time Management will assess the economics of both a larger open pit as well as evaluate an underground development option in the LFZ. Conversion of a large portion of these resources to open pit reserves will likely require higher gold prices as the orientation of both the MFE and LFZ appear to be more steeply dipping than originally anticipated, negatively affecting the economics of an enlarged pit shell. niakafiri Expectations are to increase reserves and resources in 2013 at Niakafiri. A drill program is planned at the Niakafiri deposit immediately below the current open pit reserve to further delineate mineralization at depth, where the deposit remains open at 200 metres. In addition, drilling will target the area 6 Gold price assumed is $1,500 per ounce. 7 This exploration target is not a Mineral Resource. The potential quality and grade is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt14 immediately to the north where the remainder of the resource has been defined, and pending positive results, potentially expand the Niakafiri reserves estimate to include this area. Drilling is planned to begin in the second quarter 2013 pend- ing community discussions. niakafiri West and soukhoto Gold mineralization at Soukhoto and Niakafiri West is hosted in multiple shallow dipping zones with more steeply dipping high-grade zones located in crossing structures. The Soukhoto and Niakafiri West targets are positioned from 30 metres to 200 metres below surface. Niakafiri West remains open to depth. masato The Masato deposit outcrops on the neighbouring Oromin Joint Venture Group (“OJVG”) property to the east of the ML ap- proximately 2 kilometres from the Sabodala mill. The OJVG has defined an open pit mineable reserve at Masato. The deposit has a strike length of over 2 kilometres. Gold is hosted in a shear zone that strikes north and sits immediately east of the Teranga/OJVG property boundary in the main deposit area. Dinkokhono The Dinkokhono deposit is part of the Niakafiri Shear system located about 1 kilometre north of the Niakafiri deposit. Some of the mineralization defined by earlier drilling is included in the Inferred Resource reported from Niakafiri. Drilling in 2012 was intended to infill previous drilling and test for crossing structures, however, this was deferred to 2013. mamasato Drilling in 2012 established the continuation of the Mama- sato deposit located directly across the boundary on the OJVG property onto the Sabodala ML. Gold mineralization is contained in veins with variable strike orientations. Additional drilling is planned to delineate this potential resource in 2013. ReGiOnal eXPlORatiOn We continue to methodically explore our large regional land package (RLP) and are in the process of systematically building a pipeline of prospects. Unlike other West African nations, Senegal is a relative newcomer to gold mining and exploration and we look forward to discovering world-class deposits and establishing Senegal as a regional mining leader. We currently have 10 exploration permits encompassing approximately 1,200km2 of land surrounding the Sabodala ML (33km2 exploitation permit).8 Over the past 24 months, with the initiation of a regional exploration program on this significant land package, a tremendous amount of explora- tion data has been systematically collected and interpreted to prudently implement follow-up programs. Targets are therefore in various stages of advancement and are then prioritized for follow-up work and drilling. Early geophysical and geochemi- cal analysis of these areas has led to the demarcation of at least 40 anomalies, targets and prospects and we expect that several of these areas will ultimately be developed into mineable deposits. Through 2012 we were able to identify some key targets that, though early stage, display significant potential. However, due to the sheer size of the land position, the process of advancing an anomaly through to a deposit takes time as it is imperative that work is done systematically. During 2012 we completed 62,500 metres of RAB drilling, 42,300 metres of RC and 2,400 metres of diamond drilling on 25 of our anomalies and targets, at a cost of $20 million. Highlights from the 2012 drilling program are: • The discovery of a new prospect at Tourokhoto-Marougou with a minimum strike length of 1,200 metres. • Identification of significant mineralization from RAB drilling at Saiensoutou extending for at least 1,400 metres in strike length. A 4,500 metre program of infill RC drilling commenced at Marougou in the fourth quarter of which 2,900 metres were completed at the end of the year. The program was designed to infill drill on 200 metre spaced lines to establish the continuity of the mineralization discovered earlier in the year. The remainder of the program will be completed in the first quarter of 2013. On the non-drilling front significant developments on key targets include: • Receipt of assays for detailed termite mound sampling over the Soreto and Diabougou prospects. This work highlighted that the artisanal mine workings in the area that extend for over one kilometre in strike length are part of a four kilometres long gold anomaly coincident with a northeast trending shear system. • Receipt of multi-element geochemistry for detailed termite mound sampling over the Nienyenko prospect. This work highlighted an extensive alteration-related multi-element footprint centred on the known gold anomalies and miner- alization previously identified in trenches, thus significantly enlarging the potential size of the prospect. • First pass data collection was completed at Garaboureya, consisting of termite mound geochemistry, mapping, rock chip sampling and acquisition of high-resolution aeromag- netics. This data resulted in the delineation of a significant gold anomaly coincident with a permissive structural set- ting. Interpretation work is continuing to define the drilling testing program on this target for 2013. 8 The Company’s 11th exploration permit, Sabodala North West, was not renewed by the Government in June 2012. The Company has since appealed this decision and is awaiting a response from the Government. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis15 The price of gold is the largest factor in determining our profit- ability and cash flow from operations. During 2012, the average market price of gold was $1,669 per ounce, with gold trading between a range of $1,540 and $1,792 per ounce based on the London PM Fix gold price. This compares to an average of $1,572 per ounce during 2011, with a low of $1,319 and a high of $1,895 per ounce. The price of gold is subject to volatile price movements over short periods of time and is affected by numerous industry and macroeconomic factors that are beyond our control including, but not limited to, currency exchange rate fluctua- tions and the relative strength of the U.S. dollar, the supply of and demand for gold and macroeconomic factors such as the level of interest rates and inflation expectations. In 2012, due to a continuation of concerns over global economic growth, geopolitical issues, sovereign debt and deficit levels, and continuing accommodative monetary policies put in place by many of the world’s central banks, particularly those in the major economies including the U.S., Japan, China and the European Union, gold has continued to attract investor inter- est through its role as a safe haven investment, store of value and alternative to fiat currency. Gold prices also continue to be influenced by trends in global mine production and the impact of central bank activities with a growing number of banks showing interest in gold as a reserve asset. Central banks, which had previ- ously been net sellers of gold for several years until they be- came net buyers in 2010, continued to increase purchases, which were up more than 17 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. This was primarily driven by very low sales by signa- tories to the Central Bank Gold Agreement (“CBGA”). As of December 31, 2012 the CBGA had sold only 5 tonnes of gold below the annual average of 385 tonnes over the 2000–2009 period, and continued buying by central banks outside of the Central Bank Gold Agreement in order to diversify their foreign exchange holdings.9 While the gold market is affected by fundamental global eco- nomic changes, we are also aware that the market is strongly impacted by expectations, both positive and negative. We appreciate that institutional commentary can affect such expectations. As such, the priority of Teranga is to execute on our short- and near-term goals, effective management of the Sabodala operations and exploration programs to increase production and reserves, which should translate into growth in earnings and cash flow per share. The program for 2013 has been budgeted and will focus on fast-tracking work on our current priority targets at Nienyenko, Soreto, Diabougou, Tourokhoto-Marougou and Saiensoutou. Other targets will be followed up as work progresses on the RLP. A minimum budget of $20 million is allocated for the combined exploration programs on the RLP and ML. Addition- al funding is available and will be allocated on a priority basis for prospects with clear potential for reserves definition. Beyond the current RLP, the Company is focused on acquir- ing additional exploration licenses in Senegal. The Company also expects to augment its internal growth by strategic acquisitions of companies or assets including operating assets that have growth potential or attractive exploration packages initially in Senegal but ultimately elsewhere in West Africa. HealtH anD saFety Health and safety is a constant and overriding priority at Sabo- dala. It truly comes first in all regards and everyone is continu- ously reminded to consider safety first. Each daily meeting begins with a safety report, and every site report whether it is daily, weekly, monthly or yearly begins with safety. We are emphatic about keeping health and safety top of mind. The Operational Health and Safety (“OHS”) program has under- gone a complete review in 2012. OHS management plans have been completed to address the four key areas of the business: Administration, Operations, Exploration and Construction. A strong focus was placed on proactive, people-based safety management systems and the guidance documentation to achieve this has been completed. As Teranga continues to develop the occupational health and safety programs there will be a strong focus for these programs to penetrate into the workforce. maRKet ReVieW – imPact OF Key ecOnOmic tRenD Gold Price ($/oz) London PM Fix $1,850 $1,800 $1,750 $1,700 $1,650 $1,600 $1,550 $1,500 2 1 - n a J 2 1 - r a M 2 1 - y a M 2 1 - l u J 2 1 - p e S 2 1 - v o N Source: http://www.lbma.org.uk 9 Source: Thomson Reuters GFMS 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 16 $135 $125 $115 $105 $95 $85 $75 $65 Crude Oil Prices WTI vs. Brent (USD/bbl) 1 1 - n a J 1 1 - r p A 1 1 - l u J 1 1 - t c O 2 1 - n a J 2 1 - r p A 2 1 - l u J 2 1 - t c O WTI WTI '11/12 avg Brent Brent '11/12 avg WTI Oil Hedge Contract Source: http://www.eia.gov/ Fuel costs for power generation and operation of the mobile fleet are the single largest cost to the Sabodala mine. Fuel purchased to operate the power plant and mobile equipment fleet totalled $46 million in 2012 or approximately 35 percent of operating costs. The Sabodala operation is located in remote southeastern Senegal and it is necessary to generate our own power. Six, 6 megawatt Warstila (diesel generator engines) provide power for the operations. In 2012, the operations consumed approxi- mately 20 million litres of HFO. This equates to approximately $0.21/kWh, which is less than the cost of grid electricity in industrialized Senegal. Sabodala consumes Brent crude oil and we forecast that in 2013 we will expend approximately 50 million litres of oil. The Company hedged a portion of its exposure to fuel costs by hedging its exposure to crude oil prices. The Company hedged 20,000 barrels of oil per quarter through March 31, 2013. Management may enter into further oil hedge contracts should the price and terms be deemed acceptable. The spot WTI crude oil price has moved above the hedge contract price, which has been favourable for Teranga. How- ever, since establishing the hedge contract, a wider price gap has emerged between WTI and Brent, with 2012 year-end Brent and WTI prices at approximately $110 per barrel and $92 per barrel, respectively. This has meant that the hedge contracts have been less effective as Sabodala consumes Brent crude oil rather than WTI crude oil. 2012 EUR/USD Exchange Rate 0.84 0.82 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.72 0.70 2 1 - n a J 2 1 - r a M 2 1 - y a M 2 1 - l u J 2 1 - p e S 2 1 - v o N Source: http://www.oanda.com/ A portion of operating costs and capital expenditures of Sabodala gold mine operations are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Historical accounts payables records demonstrate that the Company has an approximate 75 percent EUR exposure via West African CFA Franc, which is pegged with the EUR and also directly with the EUR. Throughout 2012, the Euro currency experienced continued volatility due to the ongoing debt crisis. The year opened with credit downgrades to several of the key players in debt crisis while Spain and Cyprus became the fourth and fifth Eurozone countries requesting a bailout. Anti-austerity protests across Europe took place, demonstrating that Eurozone stability measures were not widely supported. During September of 2012, the European Central Bank announced an unlimited sterilization bond-buying program whereby the central bank purchased bonds, but concurrently took money out of circula- tion to control the money supply. Being the primary backer to many of the stabilization measures, Germany was often resistant to the measures. However, a September German court ruled in favour of supporting the European Stability Mechanism, renewing confidence in the Eurozone’s ability to recover from the crisis. Generally, as the U.S. dollar strengthens, the EUR and other currencies weaken, and as the U.S. dollar weakens, the EUR currency strengthens. All of the Company’s production comes from its operations in Senegal therefore costs will continue to be exposed to foreign exchange rate movements. The Company continues to monitor currency exposure on an ongoing basis and will implement a hedging strategy if deemed appropriate. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis casH FlOW cash Flow (US$000s) operating Investing Financing effect on exchange rates on holdings Change in cash and cash equivalents during period cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period cash and cash equivalents – end of period 1 Cash and cash equivalents exclude restricted cash and cash held investments of longer than 90 days. 17 twelve months ended December 31 Fifteen months ended December 31 2012 72,447 (79,458) 39,678 (415) 32,252 7,470 39,722 2011 5,132 (113,522) 115,262 598 7,470 – 7,470 Operating cash Flow Operating cash flow for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $72.4 million compared to $5.1 million in the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. Operating cash flows in 2012 benefitted from higher gross profit, as a result of higher sales. investing cash Flow caPital eXPenDitURes (US$000s) Mine site capital expenditures Capitalized reserve development Development capital total capital expenditures Net cash used in investing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $79.5 million, compared to $113.5 million in the fifteen month ended December 31, 2011. The decrease reflects lower mine site capital expenditures due to completion of the mill expansion, offset by higher capital- ized reserved development on the ML and higher development capital for Gora. The amounts presented in the fifteen-month period includes the repayment of the C$50 million promis- sory note due to MDL from proceeds of the IPO, net of cash received on acquisition of the Sabodala Gold Assets. Capital expenditures for 2013, including capitalized deferred stripping, are expected to total between $105 million and $125 million. It is estimated that $20 million to $25 million will be spent on capital expenditures at Sabodala, which mostly relate to mobile equipment to expand the mining rate, a new tailings storage facility, new airstrip and community rela- tions projects. The cost to construct the Gora satellite deposit is estimated between $45 million and $50 million, including $30 million to $35 million for mobile equipment and $15 million to $20 million to construct a road to the Sabodala mill and site development costs. The timing of expenditures at Gora is de- pendent on the timing of receipt of permits. The Environmental Impact Assessment and Technical Study for the Gora deposit are expected to be submitted in first quarter 2013 for review by the Government of Senegal. twelve months ended December 31 Fifteen months ended December 31 2012 52,875 26,086 4,289 83,250 2011 62,033 14,359 – 76,392 The capitalized mine reserve development budget for 2013 is expected to total $5 million to $10 million. This budget includes the continuation of the resource expansion and conversion program on the Mine Licence. Capitalized deferred stripping costs are expected to be between $35 million and $40 million related to waste stripping activities capitalized within the Sabo- dala pit under a new accounting standard under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). For a description of this new standard, please see page 23 of this Report. Financing cash Flow Net cash provided by financing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 was $39.7 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $115.3 million in the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2012 included the drawdown of the loan facility of $60 million received at the end of the second quarter 2012, partially offset by repayments of the finance lease facility of $16.8 million. Financing cash flows in 2011 includes proceeds from the IPO, net of issuance costs, partially offset by repayments of the finance lease facility of $10.8 million. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt18 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company manages its exposure to financial risks – including liquidity risk, credit risk, currency risk, market risk, interest rate risk and price risk – through a risk mitigation strategy. Teranga does not acquire or issue derivative finan- cial instruments for trading or speculation. A condition of the Project Finance Facility provided by Macquarie Bank Limited was the establishment of gold forward sales contracts and oil energy swaps to manage exposure to commodity price risk. Following a restructure late in 2008, a total of 399,000 ounces of gold was committed forward for delivery between May 2009 and August 2013 at an average delivery price of $826 per ounce. Deliveries into the hedge position of 339,211 ounces have reduced the hedge balance to 59,789 ounces at December 31, 2012 and 38,105 ounces at January 29, 2013. The mark-to-market at the reporting date spot price of $1,664 per ounce was in a loss position of $51.5 million. The Company has a hedge agreement with respect to the oil price in order to manage its exposure to commodity risk. The Company hedged 80,000 barrels per annum for four years commencing April 1, 2009 at a flat forward price of $70 per barrel. At December 31, 2012, the remaining 20,000 barrels were hedged with a mark-to-market gain of $0.5 million at the reporting date spot price of $92 per barrel. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS Working Capital Requirements The Company’s working capital requirements primarily relate to the mining costs of extracting ore from the Sabodala gold mine and then the costs involved in processing the ore to remove the gold, before the gold itself is sold. The Company’s liquidity continues to improve, even as it extin- guishes its hedge book, with $39.7 million in cash, and cash equivalents in addition to 6,409 ounces in bullion inventory at December 31, 2012. The gold forward sales contracts declined during 2012 to 59,789 ounces as at December 31, 2012. Forward sales contracts have declined by an additional 21,684 ounces to 38,105 ounces at January 29, 2013 and are sched- uled to be fully extinguished by June 2013. In total, forward sales contracts outstanding have declined by 136,395 ounces since December 31, 2011. Management believes that the higher cash balance, extinguishment of the hedge book and 200,000 ounces of production level at Sabodala are expected to be sufficient to support the Company’s minimum operating requirements without the need for additional equity financing. During the fourth quarter 2012, the Company purchased additional mining equipment to increase the mining rate in the Sabodala pit in the amount of $13.4 million, of which ap- proximately $6 million was spent in 2012. The equipment is intended to be financed by a new equipment lease facility with Macquarie Bank Limited (“Macquarie”), which is expected to be finalized in the first quarter of 2013. The new facility is expected to provide $50 million of equipment financing and will be used to refinance the existing Société Générale lease facility at a mar- gin significantly lower than the current bank loan. In addition, the Company continues to review the merits of various debt facilities to provide additional flexibility to execute its growth strategy. Such incurrence of debt may be in the form of one or more borrowings of bank or other similar loans. There can, however, be no assurance that the Company will find the terms on such debt reasonable and therefore may not put a new facility in place. The Company has counterparty risk relating to advances provid- ed to suppliers as well as to receivables from the sale of gold bul- lion. The cash and cash equivalents are invested in short-term Term Deposits issued by Canadian banks and in sovereign debt. The Company has adopted a strategy to minimize its credit risk by substantially investing in sovereign debt issued by Canadian Agencies, Provinces and the Federal Government of Canada. A minimal cash amount is held with the Senegal banks. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis19 As at December 31, 2012, the Company had the following payments due on contractual obligations and commitments: Contractual Obligation and Commitments Mining fleet lease facility 1 2-Year loan facility 2 Exploration commitments 3 Government of Senegal payments 4 Plant expansion5 Mining equipment supply contract 6 Total Payments Due by Period (US$ Millions) Total < 1 year 1–3 years 4–5 years >5 years 10.5 60.0 27.6 5.1 0.6 7.3 10.5 – 2.3 5.1 0.6 7.3 – 60.0 25.3 – – – 111.1 25.8 85.3 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1 In 2010, an amended facility was concluded with a new limit of $27.8 million to pro- vide for the acquisition of additional mining equipment associated with the Sabodala expansion ($15.1 million) and the re-gearing of existing equipment ($2.2 million). During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company finalized the expansion of the mobile equipment loan with Société Générale by an additional $12.8 million. The amended facility contains a quarterly repayment schedule concluding with the final payment on September 30, 2013. The facility is currently drawn down to $10.5 million. 2 Reflects a 2-Year Loan Facility concluded with Macquarie in June 2012. The Loan Facility bears interest of LIBOR plus a margin of 10 percent and shall be repaid on or before June 30, 2014. 3 Reflects the exploration permits, licenses and drilling contracts committed to by the Company. 4 Comprises $4.0 million, to which an annual interest rate of 6 percent applies, payable to the Government of Senegal relating to the historical cost of acquiring the Mine License. Subsequent to year-end, full payment was made to the Government of Senegal. 5 Represents amounts to be paid for the Sabodala mill expansion over the next 12 months. 6 During the third quarter of 2012, the Company finalized a contract to purchase additional mining equipment. The equipment is intended to be financed by a new equipment lease facility with Macquarie, which is expected to be finalized during the first quarter of 2013. Sabodala Operating Commitments The Company faces the following operating commitments in respect of the Sabodala gold operation: Pursuant to the Company’s Mining Concession, a royalty of 3 percent is payable to the Government of Senegal based on the value of gold shipments, evaluated at the spot price on the shipment date. $425,000 per annum is payable for social development of lo- cal authorities in the surrounding Tambacounda region during the term of the Mining Concession. $30,000 per year is payable for logistical support of the ter- ritorial administration of the region from date of notification of the Mining Concession. $200,000 per year of production is payable for training of Directorate of Mines and Geology officers and Mines Ministry. $4.0 million plus interest is payable to the Government of Senegal pursuant to terms included in the Sabodala Mining Licence at date of grant. The Company paid this amount along with the accrued interest subsequent to year-end. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 20 sUmmaRy OF QUaRteRly inFORmatiOn 2012 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 2011 Q3 Q2 Q1 calendar Quarters Operating results ore mined Waste mined total mined ore processed Gold produced Gold sold (’000t) (’000t) (’000t) (’000t) (oz) (oz) Q4 2,038 5,274 7,312 725 655 6,242 6,897 650 2,105 5,130 7,235 491 1,117 6,316 7,433 573 71,804 55,107 45,495 41,904 71,604 62,439 38,503 35,268 Average price received ($/oz) 1,296 1,290 1,608 Cash cost ($/oz sold) 623 594 645 1,712 673 Financial Results (Us$000) 1,715 4,736 6,451 604 36,695 34,665 1,482 809 1,008 5,085 6,093 582 27,082 27,575 1,174 928 759 5,538 6,297 650 491 6,459 6,950 608 33,388 34,296 35,407 39,490 1,083 802 1,199 639 Revenue Cost of sales profit/(loss) attributable to teranga shareholders operating cash flow ($000) 122,970 105,014 62,010 ($000) 63,302 51,033 33,083 60,526 31,905 58,026 25,755 46,678 33,133 54,066 55,067 38,517 35,638 ($000) ($000) 48,781 21,336 12,590 (2,783) 27,733 (24,808) (14,413) 6,457 56,401 150 (12,989) 28,885 7,466 (12,025) (9,821) 20,013 profit/(loss) per share $ 0.20 0.09 0.05 (0.01) 0.10 (0.10) (0.06) 0.03 Our quarterly operating results in 2012 reflect the investment made in the Sabodala mine to increase the amount of material mined and processed. The increase in the quarterly mining rates in 2012 reflect the investment in four haul trucks, three drills and implementation of better maintenance practices. The higher quarterly processing rate in the final two quarters of 2012 reflects the benefit of the completion of the mill expan- sion in the third quarter of 2012, partially offset by harder ore in 2012 compared to 2011, which negatively impacted throughput rates. Higher gold production reflects the impact of better grades as mining in the higher grade area of Phase 2 began in the fourth quarter of 2011 and continued throughout 2012. Average realized price varied with the percentage of gold sales into forward sales contracts that varied on a quarter-by-quarter basis, as well as, fluctuations in the spot price of gold. Cash costs declined as gold sales increased. Higher mining and processing costs were more than offset by higher grade material processed, resulting in lower total cash costs per ounce. Our financial results for the last eight quarters, particularly for 2012, reflect a trend of increasing gold production and sales, which has translated into increasing revenues, profits and earnings per share, and operating cash flow. RisK FactORs Teranga believes that there are some risk factors that can have a material effect on the profitability, future cash flow, earnings, results of operations, stated reserves and financial condition of the Company. If any event arising from these risks occurs, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be adversely affected, the trading price of Teranga’s common shares could decline and all or part of any investment may be lost. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company, or that are currently deemed immaterial, may also materially and ad- versely affect the Company’s business operations, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Please see Teranga’s current Annual Information Form (“AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 for additional risk factors that should be considered by anyone considering investing in Teranga. The 2012 AIF is expected to be filed in March 2013. cOntinGent liaBilities The Company confirmed directly or via its holding subsidiaries that it will continue to provide financial support to its subsidiar- ies to enable them to meet their obligations as they fall due for a period of not less than 12 months. Subsequent to year-end in January 2013, Sabodala Mining Com- pany SARL (“SMC”) received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authorities claiming withholding tax of ap- teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis21 proximately $6 million on payments made to foreign provid- ers. We have reviewed the assessment with our legal counsel and are confident that they are primarily without merit. This matter is still being reviewed and considered with the Tax authorities in Senegal and Teranga is committed to paying all taxes deemed legitimately due. SMC responded to the tax assessment in February 2013 challenging all of it except for approximately $50,000 relating to withholding taxes on pay- ments made in 2008. In December 2012, Sabodala Gold Operations SA (“SGO”) received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authori- ties claiming withholding taxes of approximately $6 million on amounts considered as distributions, contribution of land built properties, withholding tax on salaries and withholding tax on payments made to foreign providers. SGO responded to the tax assessment including evidence supporting treatment of withholding taxes in accordance with the General Tax Code in Senegal. We have reviewed the assessment with our legal counsel and are confident that they are without merit and that these issues will be resolved with no or an immaterial amount of tax due. During the year 2011, SGO received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authorities claiming withholding taxes of approximately $24 million relating to interest paid to SGML Capital under the Mining Fleet Lease facility, director’s fees and services rendered by offshore companies. SGO responded to the tax assessment including evidence supporting treatment of withholding taxes in accordance with the General Tax Code in Senegal. In January 2012 the tax assessment was re-confirmed by the Senegalese tax authorities. We have reviewed the alleged breaches identified by the Senegalese tax authorities with our legal counsel and are confident that they are without merit and that these issues will be resolved with no or an immaterial amount of tax due. As a result, in February 2012 SGO filed a notice to refer the tax assessment to arbitration in accordance with Senegalese laws. The arbitration ruling is appealable to the International Chamber of Commerce of Paris. To date, Sen- egalese authorities have failed to respond to our requests for a resolution on this matter. In January 2012 the Official Journal of the Republic of Senegal issued notice of a new financial act that would impose a 5 percent “contribution” on the sale of products from mines and quarries. In April 2012, SGO received an official request by the tax authorities in Senegal, followed by a follow-up request in May 2012, for payment of 5 percent of gold sales completed in March pursuant to this new financial act. SGO has challenged the assessment under this new 5 percent tax citing the fiscal stability provisions included in its Sabodala Mining Convention, based on the opinions received from both national and inter- national counsel. In fourth quarter 2012, the Government of Senegal issued a second assessment relating to gold sales dur- ing the second quarter. Should this issue not be resolved with the Government of Senegal, we can appeal the Government’s decision to apply the tax to the International Chamber of Com- merce of Paris pursuant to our rights under our Sabodala Min- ing Convention. During the third quarter 2012, the Government of Senegal began enforcement measures against all mining companies impacted by this new tax on mining products. As of the date of this report, the Government of Senegal has collect- ed a total of $850,000 from the Company in partial satisfaction of amounts assessed to June 30, 2012. The potential impact to the Company’s earnings and total cash costs is approximately $11.6 million and $60 per ounce of gold sold, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) do not reflect this potential impact as Management believes that the special contribution tax should not apply to SGO given the fiscal stability provision in its Mining Convention. The Company continues to challenge the validity of the application of this tax to Sabodala Gold Operations given fiscal stability protections in its Mining Convention and anticipates that a resolution of the matter will be reached with the Government in due course. It is Management’s intention to work with the Senegalese authorities in order to find a mutually agreeable solution that respects our overall fiscal stability rights included in our Mining Convention. Teranga’s vision is to grow its business in Senegal with the Government. The Company plans to work with the Government to help address some of Senegal’s immediate financial needs. cRitical accOUntinG POlicies anD estimates The following are critical judgments that management has made in the process of applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements: Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments Management assesses the fair value of the Company’s financial derivatives in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4 to the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Fair values have been determined based on well-established valu- ation models and market conditions existing at the reporting date. These calculations require the use of estimates and as- sumptions. Changes in assumptions concerning interest rates, gold prices and volatilities could have a significant impact on comprehensive income due to the change in the fair value attributed to the Company’s financial derivatives. When these assumptions change or become known in the future, such differences will impact asset and liability carrying values in the period in which they change or become known. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt22 Ore Reserves Management makes estimates of the Company’s ore reserves based upon information compiled by Competent Persons as defined in accordance with the Canadian Code for Reporting Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves and Qualified Persons as defined in NI 43-101, which is similar to the Australian standards. The estimated quantities of economically recover- able reserves are based upon interpretations of geological models and require assumptions to be made regarding factors such as estimates of short- and long-term exchange rates, estimates of short- and long-term commodity prices, future capital requirements and future operating perfor- mance. Changes in reported reserve estimates can impact the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, provision for rehabilitation obligations, the recognition of deferred tax assets, as well as the amount of depreciation and amortiza- tion charged to the income statement. Units of Production Management makes estimates of recoverable reserves in determining the depreciation and amortization of mine assets. This results in a depreciation/amortization charge propor- tional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life of mine production. Each item’s life, which is assessed annually, has regard to both its physical life limitations and to present as- sessments of economically recoverable reserves of the mine property at which the asset is located. The calculations require the use of estimates and assumption, including the amount of recoverable reserve and estimates of future capital expendi- ture. The Company’s units of production calculation is based on life of mine gold production. As the Company updated its estimate regarding the expected units of production over the life of the mine, amortization under the units of production basis will change. Recoverable reserves increased at the be- ginning of 2012, resulting in a decrease in units of production amortization for the year. Mine Rehabilitation Provision Management assesses the Company’s mine rehabilitation provision annually. Significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining the provisions for mine rehabilitation as there are numerous factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable. These factors include estimates of the extent and cost of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regula- tory change, cost increases, and changes in discount rates. Those uncertainties may result in future actual expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. The provision at the balance date represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future rehabilitation costs required. Changes to estimated future costs are recognized in the state- ment of financial position by adjusting the rehabilitation asset and liability. Impairment of Assets Management assesses each cash generating unit at each reporting period to determine whether any indication of impair- ment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made that is considered to be the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. These assessments require the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, exploration potential and operating performance. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. Fair value for mineral assets is generally determined as the present value of estimated future cash flows arising from the continued use of the asset, which includes estimates such as the cost of future expansion plans and eventual disposal, using assumptions that an independent market participant may take into account. Cash flows are discounted by an appropriate discount rate to determine the net present value. Management has assessed its cash generating units as being all sources of mill feed through a central mill, which is the lowest level for which cash flows are largely independent of other assets. Production Start Date Management assesses the stage of each mine development project to determine when a mine moves into the production stage. The criteria used to assess the start date of a mine are determined based on the unique nature of each mine develop- ment project. The Company considers various relevant criteria to assess when the mine is substantially complete, ready for its intended use and moves into the production phase. Some of the criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: • the level of capital expenditure compared to construction cost estimates; • completion of a reasonable period of testing of the mine plant and equipment; • ability to produce metal in saleable form; and • ability to sustain ongoing production of metal. When a mine development project moves into the production stage, the capitalization of certain mine construction costs ceases and costs are either regarded as inventory or ex- pensed, except for capitalizable costs related to mining asset additions or improvements, underground mine development or mineable reserve development. It is also at this point that depreciation/amortization commences. Fair Value of Stock Options Management assesses the fair value of stock options granted in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4(q) to teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis23 the Company’s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black- Scholes model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options are granted. The calculation requires the use of estimates and assumptions. As there were no historical data available for determination of the fair value of the stock options granted, the Company developed its assumptions based on information available in the mining industry using comparable companies operating in the gold sector. Functional Currency The functional currency of each of Company’s entities is mea- sured using the currency of the primary economic environ- ment in which that entity operates. The functional currency of the corporate office is Canadian dollars and the functional currency of all other entities within the group is U.S. dollars. Functional currency of each entity was determined based on the currency that mainly influences sales prices for goods and services, labour, material and other costs. The Company’s corporate entity changed its functional currency from the Canadian dollar to the United States dol- lar as of January 1, 2012. Per IAS 21, an entity’s functional currency should reflect the underlying transactions, events, and conditions relevant to the entity. Based on management’s evaluation taking into consideration the currency of the main sources of income, intercompany charges, significant capital projects, source of funding of expenditures, the currency in which cash and cash deposits are maintained as well as the currency of corporate office expenditures, the functional cur- rency of the corporate entity is determined to be the United States dollar. The change in functional currency has been accounted for prospectively. cHanGe in accOUntinG POlicies Inventory Valuation Effective January 1, 2012 the Company changed its method of measuring and recording the cost of stockpile, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory. The new policy measures and records the costs associated with stockpile, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory based on recovered ounces of gold. Under the previous policy, stockpile, gold in circuit and gold bullion costs were measured and recorded based on tonnes. The new policy better matches revenue and expenses as compared to the former policy because it attaches higher costs to the higher grade ore and charges more costs to the income statement during periods that higher grade ore is processed and sold. Management believes that the change in account- ing policy for inventory valuation better matches the income statement and provides a more reliable measurement of the stockpile, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory. The change in accounting policy has been applied retro- actively as it is shown in Note 4 to the Company’s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Depreciation In line with the change in the method of measuring and recording inventory, the Company changed its accounting policy regarding units of production depreciation as of Janu- ary 1, 2012. Under the previous method, units of produc- tion fixed assets were amortized over life of mine tonnes processed. The new policy is based on recovered ounces of gold. Management believes that the change in accounting policy for units of production depreciation better matches revenue and costs. The change in accounting policy has been applied retro- actively as it is shown in Note 4 to the Company’s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. aDOPtiOn OF neW accOUntinG stanDaRDs stripping costs in the Production Phase of a surface mine In October 2011, the IASB issued IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine. IFRIC 20 pro- vides guidance on the accounting for the costs of stripping activity in the production phase of surface mining when two benefits accrue to the entity from the stripping activity: useable ore that can be used to produce inventory and improved access to further quantities of material that will be mined in future periods. IFRIC 20 must be applied starting January 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The Com- pany has performed a preliminary assessment of the impact of adopting IFRIC 20 on its consolidated financial statements indicating that we will capitalize waste stripping costs, which are not permitted under our current accounting policy. Based on our analysis, we expect that our restated 2012 financial statements will show an increase in property, plant and equipment, a decrease in inventory and an increase in profit. The quantum of these changes is currently under review in preparation of our first quarter 2013 report. nOn-iFRs Financial measURes The Company provides some non-IFRS measures as supple- mentary information that management believes may be useful to investors to explain Teranga’s financial results. “Average real- ized price” is a financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better under- stand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt24 silver sales. Average realized price excludes from revenues unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative con- tracts. The average realized price is intended to provide ad- ditional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. “Total cash cost per ounce sold” is a common financial performance measure in the gold mining industry but has no standard meaning under IFRS. The Company reports total cash costs on a sales basis. We believe that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, cer- tain investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a Company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, which was a world- wide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and in- cluded leading North American gold producers. The Gold Insti- tute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is considered the accepted standard of reporting cash cost of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. “Total depreciation and amortization per ounce sold” is a common financial performance measure in the gold mining industry but has no standard meaning under IFRS. It is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Total cash costs per ounce sold and total depreciation per ounce sold are calculated as follows: three months ended December 31 twelve months ended December 31 2012 2011 2012 2011 Restated (i) Restated (i) Gold produced Gold sold Cost of sales 1 less: depreciation and amortization less: realized oil hedge gain Add: non-cash inventory movement less: other adjustments total cash costs total cash costs per ounce sold Depreciation and amortization non-cash inventory movement total depreciation and amortization total depreciation and amortization per ounce sold total production costs per ounce sold oz oz ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) ($000) $/oz ($000) ($000) ($000) $/oz $/oz 71,804 71,604 63,302 (17,953) (365) 346 (689) 44,642 623 17,953 (346) 17,607 246 869 36,695 34,665 25,755 (8,676) (481) 516 10,924 28,038 809 8,676 (516) 8,160 235 1,044 214,310 131,461 207,814 137,136 179,323 133,043 (52,660) (35,035) (1,936) (2,009) 6,377 902 (816) 10,331 130,288 107,232 627 782 52,660 35,035 (6,377) (902) 46,283 34,133 223 850 249 1,031 (i) The Company adopted changes to certain accounting policies effective January 1, 2012 that have been retrospectively applied to the three and fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. See “Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 – Change in Accounting Policies”. 1 Total cash costs per ounce sold for each quarter of 2011 were restated to comply with the Company’s new accounting policies for measuring and recording ore stockpile costs, and reporting total cash costs after inventory movement, in line with the Company’s accounting policies and industry standards. OUtstanDinG sHaRe Data The Company’s fully diluted share capital as at the report date was: Ordinary shares Stock options granted at an exercise price of $3.00 per option Fully diluted share capital Outstanding 245,618,000 17,139,167 262,757,167 teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis 25 tRansactiOns WitH RelateD PaRties equity interests in Related Parties Details of percentages of ordinary shares held in subsidiaries are disclosed in Note 39 to the Company’s Annual Consoli- dated Financial Statements. transactions with Key management Personnel Details of key management personnel compensation are disclosed in Note 38 to the Company’s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. No loans were made to directors or director-related entities during the year. transactions with Other Related Parties There was zero balance outstanding to related parties as at December 31, 2012. shareholdings Teranga’s 90 percent shareholding in SGO, the company operating the Sabodala gold mine, is held 89.5 percent through Mauritius holding company Sabodala Gold Mauritius Limited (“SGML”), and the remaining 0.5 percent by individu- als nominated by SGML to be at the Board of Directors in order to meet the minimum shareholding requirements under Senegalese law. On death or resignation, a share individually held would be transferred to another representative of SGML or added to its current 89.5 percent shareholding according to the circumstances at the time. ceO/cFO ceRtiFicatiOn The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the Company. The Company’s CEO and CFO certify that, as at December 31, 2012, the Company’s DC&P have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the Company is made known to them by others, particularly dur- ing the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and information required to be disclosed by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation. They also certify that the Company’s ICFR has been designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP. The control framework the Company’s CEO and CFO used to design the Company’s ICFR is COSO. There is no material weakness relating to the design of ICFR. There is no limitation on scope of design as described in paragraph 3.3 of NI 52-109. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures was conducted as of December 31, 2012 by the Company’s management under the supervision of the CEO and the CFO. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, the Company’s DC&P are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under Canadian securities legislation is summarized and reported within the time periods specified therein. The Company’s management, under the supervision of the CEO and the CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012. There is no limitation on scope of design as described in paragraph 5.3 of NI 52-109. There has been no change in the Company’s ICFR that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reason- ably likely to materially affect, the Company’s ICFR. RisKs anD UnceRtainties The Company is subject to various financial and operational risks and uncertainties that could have a significant impact on profitability and levels of operating cash flow. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in metal prices (principally the price of gold), capital and op- erating cost estimates, borrowing risks, production estimates, need for additional financing, uncertainty in the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the inherent danger of mining, infrastructure risk, hedging activities, insured and uninsured risks, environmental risks and regulations, govern- ment regulation, ability to obtain and renew licenses and permits, foreign operations risks, title to properties, competi- tion, dependence on key personnel, currency, repatriation of earnings and stock exchange price fluctuations. cOmPetent PeRsOns statement The technical information contained in this Report relating to the mineral reserve estimates within the Sabodala, Sutuba, Niakafiri and Gora deposits and the Stockpiles, is based on information compiled by Julia Martin, P.Eng., MAusIMM (CP), a full-time employee with AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., independent of Teranga, a “qualified person” as defined 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt26 in NI 43-101 and a “competent person” as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Ex- ploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Martin has sufficient experience relevant to the style of min- eralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Martin has reviewed and accepts responsibil- ity for the reserve estimates disclosed above. Ms. Martin has consented to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. The technical information contained in this Report relating to the mineral resources is based on information compiled by Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie, who is a Member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie is a full-time employee of Teranga and is not “independent” within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Per- son as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie is a “Qualified Person” under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and she consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. The technical information contained in this Report relating to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr. Martin Pawlitschek, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr. Pawlitschek is a consultant of Teranga and is not “independent” within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Pawlitschek has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity is undertak- ing to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Pawl- itschek is a “Qualified Person” in accordance with NI 43-101 and he consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears in this Report. teranga gold corporation / management’s discussion & analysis27 manaGement’s ResPOnsiBility FOR Financial RePORtinG The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Manage- ment acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and, where relevant, the choice of accounting principles. Management maintains an appropriate system of internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are authorized, assets safeguarded, and proper records maintained. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has met with the Company’s independent auditors to review the scope and results of the annual audit and to review the consolidated financial statements and related financial reporting matters prior to submitting the consolidated financial statements to the Board for approval. The Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, have conducted an audit in accordance with generally ac- cepted auditing standards, and their report follows. alan Hill Executive Chairman and CEO Richard young President and Chief Executive Officer navin Dyal Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 28 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION inDePenDant aUDitOR’s RePORt To the Shareholders of Teranga Gold Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Teranga Gold Corporation, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss), consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 21, 2012 and the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information management’s Responsibility for the consolidated Financial statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in ac- cordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assess- ments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appro- priateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Teranga Gold Corporation as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year ended December 21, 2012 and the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. Chartered Professional Accountants Chartered Accountants Licensed Public Accountants February 20, 2013 cOnsOliDateD statement OF cOmPReHensiVe incOme / (lOss) For the 12 months ended December 31, 2012 and 15 months ended December 31, 2011 (in US$000’s except for share and per share amounts) 29 Revenue Cost of sales Gross profit Exploration and evaluation expenditures Administration expenses Share-based compensation Finance costs Losses on gold hedge contracts (Losses)/Gains on oil hedge contracts Net foreign exchange (losses)/gains Impairment of available for sale financial asset Other income Profit/(loss) before income tax Income tax benefit Profit/(loss) for the period Profit/(Loss) attributable to: Shareholders Non-controlling interests Profit/(loss) for the period Other comprehensive income/(loss): Exchange differences arising on translation of Teranga corporate entity Change in fair value of available for sale financial asset, net of tax Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the period note 8 9 10 36 11 25 8 12 26 25 twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 (note 5 ) 350,520 (179,323 ) 171,197 (16,657 ) (17,931 ) (4,694 ) (7,789 ) (15,274 ) (427 ) (2,574 ) (11,917 ) 36 (77,227 ) 93,970 115 94,085 79,924 14,161 94,085 (63 ) 6,775 6,712 236,873 (148,812 ) 88,061 (31,659 ) (13,448 ) (12,411 ) (2,946 ) (47,943 ) 2,203 4,486 – 848 (100,870 ) (12,809 ) 92 (12,717 ) (16,040 ) 3,323 (12,717 ) (935 ) (1,319 ) (2,254 ) total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period 100,797 (14,971 ) Total comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to: Shareholders Non-controlling interests total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period earnings/(losses) per share from operations attributable to the shareholders of the company during the period – basic earnings/(losses) per share – diluted earnings/(losses) per share 27 27 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 86,636 14,161 100,797 0.33 0.33 (18,294 ) 3,323 (14,971 ) (0.07 ) (0.07 ) 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 30 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION / CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cOnsOliDateD statements OF Financial POsitiOn December 31, 2012 (in US$000’s except for share and per share amounts) note as at December 31, 2012 as at December 31, 2011 (note 5 ) current assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Restricted cash Trade and other receivables Inventories Financial derivative assets Other assets Available for sale financial assets total current assets non-current assets Inventories Financial derivative assets Property, plant and equipment Mine development expenditures Intangible assets total non-current assets total assets current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Financial derivative liabilities Provisions total current liabilities non-current liabilities Financial derivative liabilities Provisions Borrowings total non-current liabilities total liabilities equity Issued capital Foreign currency translation reserve Equity-settled share-based compensation reserve Investment revaluation reserve Accumulated income/(loss) equity attributable to shareholders Non-controlling interests total equity total equity and liabilities 34 13 14 15 16 25 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 21 24 26 39,722 – – 6,482 82,474 456 12,896 15,010 7,470 593 3,004 20,447 48,365 2,288 12,751 19,800 157,040 114,718 40,659 – 241,838 109,060 1,859 393,416 550,456 44,823 10,415 51,548 1,940 108,726 – 10,312 58,193 68,505 177,231 305,412 (998) 16,358 5,456 36,549 362,777 10,448 373,225 550,456 31,942 532 238,510 89,825 1,085 361,894 476,612 43,238 16,468 79,241 1,954 140,901 50,318 9,215 7,509 67,042 207,943 305,412 (935) 12,599 (1,319) (43,375) 272,382 (3,713) 268,669 476,612 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements Approved by the Board of Directors alan Hill Executive Chairman alan thomas Non-Executive Director cOnsOliDateD statement OF cHanGes in eQUity For the 12 months ended December 31, 2012 and 15 months ended December 31, 2011 (US$000’s) twelve months ended December 31, 2012 issued capital At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 Shares issued on incorporation of the Company Shares issued on the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and a regional exploration package Shares issued from public and private offerings Less: Share issue costs At December 31 Foreign currency translation reserve At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 note 24 24 24 Exchange difference arising on translation of Teranga corporate entity 26 At December 31 equity-settled share-based compensation reserve At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 Equity-settled share-based compensation reserve At December 31 investment revaluation reserve At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 Impairment of available for sale financial asset Change in fair value of available for sale financial asset, net of tax 25 At December 31 accumulated income/(loss) At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 Profit/(Loss) attributable to shareholders Impact of change in accounting policy At December 31 non-controlling interest At January 1, 2012 / October 1, 2010 5 Non-controlling interest arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Non-controlling interest – portion of profit for the period At December 31 total shareholders’ equity at December 31 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 31 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 (note 5) – 186,665 135,005 (16,258 ) 305,412 – (935 ) (935 ) – 12,599 12,599 – – (1,319 ) (1,319 ) – (16,040 ) (27,335 ) (43,375 ) – (7,036 ) 3,323 (3,713 ) 268,669 305,412 – – – – 305,412 (935 ) (63 ) (998 ) 12,599 3,759 16,358 (1,319 ) 1,319 5,456 5,456 (43,375 ) 79,924 – 36,549 (3,713 ) – 14,161 10,448 373,225 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt32 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION / CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cOnsOliDateD statement OF casH FlOWs For the 12 months ended December 31, 2012 and 15 months ended December 31, 2011 (US$000’s) twelve months ended December 31, 2012 note Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 ) (note 5 17 18 19 11 23 36 25 34 17 18 19 cash flows related to operating activities Profit/(Loss) for the period Depreciation of property, plant and equipment Depreciation of capitalized mine development costs Amortization of intangibles Amortization of borrowing costs Unwinding of discount Share-based compensation Net change in losses on gold hedge Net change in losses on oil hedge Buyback of gold hedge sales contracts Income tax paid Mine restoration and rehabilitation provision Deferred income tax benefit on reversal of temporary differences Impairment of available for sale financial asset Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment Changes in working capital net cash provided by operating activities cash flows related to investing activities Decrease/(Increase) in restricted cash Redemption of short-term investments Expenditures for property, plant and equipment Expenditures for mine development Acquisition of intangibles Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment Payment for acquisition of Sabodala gold mine and regional land package net of cash acquired net cash used in investing activities cash flows related to financing activities Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net of issue costs Loan facility, net of borrowing cost paid Repayment of borrowings Drawdown from finance lease facility, net of financing cost paid Interest paid on borrowings net cash provided by financing activities Effect of exchange rates on cash holdings in foreign currencies net increase in cash and cash equivalents held cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period cash and cash equivalents at the end of period The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 94,085 41,999 11,142 650 877 53 3,759 (39,010 ) 2,364 (39,000 ) – – – 11,917 (131 ) (16,256 ) 72,449 3,004 593 (51,451 ) (30,377 ) (1,424 ) 195 – (79,460 ) – 57,695 (16,799 ) 2,857 (4,075 ) 39,678 (415 ) 32,252 7,470 39,722 (12,717 ) 29,541 10,200 490 328 47 12,411 (1,789 ) 113 – (638 ) 425 (231 ) – – (33,048 ) 5,132 (3,004 ) 181 (60,825 ) (14,359 ) (1,208 ) – (34,307 ) (113,522 ) 118,747 – (10,849 ) 9,612 (2,248 ) 115,262 598 7,470 – 7,470 33 nOtes tO cOnsOliDateD Financial statements As at and for the 12 months ended December 31, 2012 and 15 months ended December 31, 2011 (in US$000’s except for share and per share amounts) 1. GeneRal inFORmatiOn Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga” or the “Company”) is a Canadian-based gold company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: TGZ) and the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX: TGZ). Teranga is principally engaged in the production and sale of gold, as well as related activities such as explora- tion and mine development. The Company was incorporated in Canada on October 1, 2010. Teranga was created to acquire the Sabodala gold mine and a large regional exploration land package, located in Senegal, West Africa, along with shares held in Oromin Explorations Ltd. (“Oromin”) from Mineral Deposits Limited (“MDL”), collectively referred to as the Sabodala Gold Assets. The Sabodala gold mine, which came into operation in 2009, is located 650 kilometres southeast of the capital, Dakar within the West African Birimian geological belt in Senegal, and about 90 kilometres from major gold mines in Mali. The address of its principal office is 121 King Street West, Suite 2600, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3T9. 2. DemeRGeR FROm mineRal DePOsits limiteD (“Demerger”) On November 23, 2010, Teranga completed the acquisi- tion of the Sabodala Gold Assets by a way of Demerger from MDL. As part of the Demerger certain assets consisting of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited (“SGML”), which holds a 90% interest in the Sabodala Gold Operations SA (“SGO”), the holder of the Sabodala gold mine, and a 100% interest in the Sabodala Mining Company SARL (“SMC”), an exploration entity that holds the regional land package; all of the issued and out- standing shares of SGML (Capital) Limited; and 18,699,500 common shares of Oromin Exploration Ltd., originally held by MDL; were transferred to Teranga in consideration for the issuance of 200,000,000 common shares of Teranga to MDL (approximately 160,000,000 of such common shares were then in specie distributed to MDL’s shareholders) and the assumption of a C$50 million promissory note owing to MDL. As the transaction was a common control transaction, the Company has elected to apply the “pooling of interest” method to account for the Demerger (see Note 4). twelve months ended December 31, 2012 note Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 (note 5 ) cash flows related to operating activities Profit/(Loss) for the period Depreciation of property, plant and equipment Depreciation of capitalized mine development costs Amortization of intangibles Amortization of borrowing costs Unwinding of discount Share-based compensation Net change in losses on gold hedge Net change in losses on oil hedge Buyback of gold hedge sales contracts Income tax paid Mine restoration and rehabilitation provision Impairment of available for sale financial asset Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment Changes in working capital net cash provided by operating activities cash flows related to investing activities Decrease/(Increase) in restricted cash Redemption of short-term investments Expenditures for property, plant and equipment Expenditures for mine development Acquisition of intangibles Deferred income tax benefit on reversal of temporary differences 17 18 19 11 23 36 25 34 17 18 19 Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment Payment for acquisition of Sabodala gold mine and regional land package net of cash acquired net cash used in investing activities cash flows related to financing activities Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net of issue costs Loan facility, net of borrowing cost paid Repayment of borrowings Drawdown from finance lease facility, net of financing cost paid Interest paid on borrowings net cash provided by financing activities Effect of exchange rates on cash holdings in foreign currencies net increase in cash and cash equivalents held cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period cash and cash equivalents at the end of period The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 94,085 41,999 11,142 650 877 53 3,759 (39,010 ) 2,364 (39,000 ) – – – 11,917 (131 ) (16,256 ) 72,449 3,004 593 (51,451 ) (30,377 ) (1,424 ) 195 (79,460 ) – – 57,695 (16,799 ) 2,857 (4,075 ) 39,678 (415 ) 32,252 7,470 39,722 (12,717 ) 29,541 10,200 490 328 47 12,411 (1,789 ) 113 – (638 ) 425 (231 ) – – (33,048 ) 5,132 (3,004 ) 181 (60,825 ) (14,359 ) (1,208 ) – (34,307 ) (113,522 ) 118,747 – (10,849 ) 9,612 (2,248 ) 115,262 598 7,470 – 7,470 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 34 The table below represents the costs of assets and liabilities acquired by Teranga from MDL by way of Demerger: as at current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Financial derivative assets Other assets Available for sale financial asset total current assets non-current assets Inventories Mine development expenditure Financial derivative assets Intangible assets Capitalized mine convention costs Property, plant and equipment total non-current assets total assets current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Financial derivative liabilities Current tax liabilities Provisions total current liabilities non-current liabilities Trade and other payables Financial derivative liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Borrowings total non-current liabilities total liabilities Non-controlling interest net assets november 23, 2010 Restatement 1 november 23, 2010 Restated 14,924 238,089 82,842 1,074 2,688 21,109 – – (12,267 ) – – – 360,726 (12,267 ) 6,514 112,710 1,859 367 10,133 209,023 340,606 701,332 256,910 8,630 37,078 518 1,696 304,832 1,657 94,270 231 2,284 16,256 114,698 419,530 1,563 283,365 – – – – – 8,427 8,427 (3,840 ) – – – – – – – – – – – – – 384 (3,456 ) 14,924 238,089 70,575 1,074 2,688 21,109 348,459 6,514 112,710 1,859 367 10,133 217,450 349,033 697,492 256,910 8,630 37,078 518 1,696 304,832 1,657 94,270 231 2,284 16,256 114,698 419,530 1,947 279,909 Reconciliation of the value of shares issued on the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and a regional exploration package: as at Net assets acquired Less deferred compensation (C$50 million) Value of shares issued on acquisition november 23, 2010 Restatement 1 november 23, 2010 Restated 283,365 (49,231) 234,134 (3,456 ) – (3,456 ) 279,909 (49,231 ) 230,678 1 During the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, the Company identified two changes required relating to the net assets acquired as part of the Demerger from MDL on November 23, 2010. Property, plant and equipment was understated by $8.4 million related to accelerated depreciation of mobile equipment in excess of the Company’s policy. Stockpile inventory was overstated by a total of $12.3 million due to accelerated depreciation related to mobile equipment and costs assigned to inventory in excess of net realizable value. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementsas at current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Other assets Financial derivative assets Available for sale financial asset total current assets non-current assets Inventories Mine development expenditure Financial derivative assets Intangible assets Capitalized mine convention costs Property, plant and equipment total non-current assets total assets current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Financial derivative liabilities Current tax liabilities Provisions total current liabilities non-current liabilities Trade and other payables Financial derivative liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Borrowings total non-current liabilities total liabilities Non-controlling interest net assets november 23, 2010 Restatement 1 november 23, 2010 360,726 (12,267 ) 14,924 238,089 82,842 1,074 2,688 21,109 6,514 112,710 1,859 367 10,133 209,023 340,606 701,332 256,910 8,630 37,078 518 1,696 304,832 1,657 94,270 231 2,284 16,256 114,698 419,530 1,563 283,365 283,365 (49,231) 234,134 (12,267 ) 8,427 8,427 (3,840 ) – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 384 (3,456 ) (3,456 ) – (3,456 ) Restated 14,924 238,089 70,575 1,074 2,688 21,109 348,459 6,514 112,710 1,859 367 10,133 217,450 349,033 697,492 256,910 8,630 37,078 518 1,696 304,832 1,657 94,270 231 2,284 16,256 114,698 419,530 1,947 279,909 Restated 279,909 (49,231 ) 230,678 Reconciliation of the value of shares issued on the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and a regional exploration package: november 23, 2010 Restatement 1 november 23, 2010 as at Net assets acquired Less deferred compensation (C$50 million) Value of shares issued on acquisition 1 During the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, the Company identified two changes required relating to the net assets acquired as part of the Demerger from MDL on November 23, 2010. Property, plant and equipment was understated by $8.4 million related to accelerated depreciation of mobile equipment in excess of the Company’s policy. Stockpile inventory was overstated by a total of $12.3 million due to accelerated depreciation related to mobile equipment and costs assigned to inventory in excess of net realizable value. 35 (e) Functional and Presentation currency The functional currency of each of the Company’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environ- ment in which that entity operates. The functional currency of all entities within the group is the United States dollar. The con- solidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars, which is the Company’s presentation currency. The Company’s corporate entity changed its functional cur- rency from the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar as of January 1, 2012. Per IAS 21, the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, an entity’s functional currency should reflect the underlying transactions, events and conditions relevant to the entity. Based on management’s evaluation taking into consideration the currency of the main sources of income, intercompany charges, significant capital projects, source of funding of expenditures, the currency in which cash and cash deposits are maintained as well as the currency of corporate office expenditures, management determined the functional currency of the corporate entity to be the United States dollar. The change in functional currency has been accounted for prospectively. (f) critical accounting Judgments and Key sources of estimation Uncertainty The preparation of consolidated financial statements in con- formity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses and other income during the period. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, having regard to prior experience. While management believes that these judgments, estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ from the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements. Judgments made by management in the application of IFRS that have significant effects on the consolidated financial state- ments and estimates with a significant risk of material adjust- ments, where applicable, are contained in the relevant notes to the financial statements. Refer to Note 7 for critical judgments in applying the entity’s accounting policies, and key sources of estimation uncertainty. The restated net assets as at November 23, 2010 reflect a total decrease of $3.5 million after adjusting the non-controlling interest with a corresponding adjustment to the Company’s share capital. 3. Basis OF PRePaRatiOn (a) statement of compliance These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Stan- dards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. (b) Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements have been presented in United States dollars unless otherwise stated. The consoli- dated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for equity settled and cash settled share-based payments that are fair valued at the date of grant and certain other financial assets and liabilities that are mea- sured at fair value. (c) change of Fiscal year On May 10, 2011, the Board of Directors passed a resolution setting the financial year-end of the Company at December 31st. The Board felt this change would better synchronize its financial reporting with that of comparable companies within the mining sector as well as better align its financial reporting with its business planning cycle. The con- solidated financial statements for the current year are for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, and for the fifteen-month period ended December 31, 2011 for the com- parative period. The amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements are not entirely comparable. (d) change in Presentation of Gains and losses on Hedge contracts The Company has changed the presentation of gains and losses on gold and oil hedge contracts effective January 1, 2012. Realized gains and losses on gold hedge contracts are disclosed as losses on gold hedge contracts below gross profit; previously they were included in revenue. Gains and losses on oil hedge contracts are classified as gains and losses on oil hedge contracts below gross profit; previously they were included in cost of sales. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt36 4. siGniFicant accOUntinG POlicies fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined. (a) Basis of consolidation The consolidated financial statements are prepared by con- solidating the financial statements of Teranga Gold Corporation and its subsidiaries: Teranga Gold (B.V.I.) Corporation, Teranga Gold (USA) Corporation, Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited, and SGML (Capital) Limited and its subsidiaries as defined in IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”. The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of the acquisition is measured based on the fair values at the date of acquisition of assets and liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Company in exchange for control of the acquiree. The goodwill arising, if any, is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-control- ling interests in the acquiree and the fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net as- sets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). The consolidated financial statements include the informa- tion and results of each subsidiary from the date on which the Company obtains control and until such time as the Company ceases to control such entity. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all inter- company balances and transactions between entities in the Company, including any unrealized profits or losses, have been eliminated. Non-controlling interests in the net assets (excluding goodwill) of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the Company’s equity therein. Non-controlling interests consist of the amount of those interests at the date of the original busi- ness combination and the non-controlling interests’ share of changes in equity since the date of the combination. Total comprehensive loss is attributed to non-controlling inter- ests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance. (b) Foreign currency transactions Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at Exchange differences are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they arise except for exchange differences on monetary items receivable from or payable to a foreign opera- tion for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future which form part of the net investment in a foreign operation and which are recognized in a foreign currency translation reserve within equity and recognized in profit or loss on disposal of the net investment. (c) cash and cash equivalents Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value and have a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of acquisition. When applicable, bank overdrafts are shown within borrow- ings in current liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position. (d) short-term investments Short-term investments represent investments in guaranteed investment certificates with maturity dates of more than 90 days. Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost. (e) inventories Gold bullion, gold in circuit and ore in stockpiles are physi- cally measured or estimated and valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost represents the weighted aver- age cost and includes direct costs and an appropriate portion of fixed and variable production overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization, incurred in converting materi- als into finished goods. By-product metals inventory on hand obtained as a result of the production process to extract gold are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Materials and supplies are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Any provision for obsolescence is determined by reference to specific inventory items identified. A regular and ongoing review is undertaken to establish the extent of surplus items and a provision is made for any potential loss upon disposal. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordi- nary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and applicable variable selling expenses. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements37 (f) Property, Plant and equipment (g) leased assets Property, plant and equipment are measured on the cost basis less depreciation and impairment losses. The cost of property, plant and equipment constructed by the Company includes the cost of materials, direct labour and borrowing costs where appropriate. Assets under construction and assets purchased that are not ready for use are capitalized under capital work in progress. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of comprehensive income/(loss) dur- ing the financial period in which they are incurred. Depreciation The depreciable amount of property, plant and equipment is depreciated over their useful lives of the asset commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. The Company uses the units-of-production (“UOP”) method when depreciating mining assets, which results in a depreciation charge based on the recovered ounces of gold. Mining assets include buildings and property improvements and plant and equipment. Depreciation is calculated using the following method: class of Property, Plant and equipment Buildings and property improvements method years UOP Plant and equipment UOP/Straight line 5.0–8.0 years Office furniture and equipment Straight line 3.0–6.7 years Motor vehicles Straight line 5.0 years Plant equipment under finance lease Straight line 5.0–7.0 years The assets’ residual values, depreciation method and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each reporting date. Capital work in progress is not depreciated. The gain or loss arising upon disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined as the differ- ence between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). Assets Under Finance Lease Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over their expected useful lives on the same basis as owned assets. Leases are classified as finance leases when the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the leased asset to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases. Finance leases are capitalized at the lease’s commencement at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the pres- ent value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the finance balance outstanding. Finance charges are charged directly against income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalized in accor- dance with the Company’s general policy on borrowing costs. Refer to Note 4(k). Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. (h) mine Development Mine development expenditures are recognized at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses. Where commercial production in an area of interest has commenced, the associated costs are amortized over the estimated eco- nomic life of the mine on a UOP basis. (i) intangible assets Intangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amor- tization and any impairment losses. Amortization is charged on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful life and amortization method is reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period with any changes in these accounting estimates being accounted for on a prospec- tive basis. (j) impairment of long-lived assets At each reporting date, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss, if any. The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt38 from other assets, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest group of cash-generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified. If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immedi- ately in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset or cash generating unit is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset or cash generating unit in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). (k) Borrowing costs Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are recognized in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss) in the period in which they are incurred. (l) employee Benefits A liability is recognized for benefits accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave and long-term ser- vice leave when it is probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably. Liabilities recognized in respect of employee benefits expected to be settled within twelve months are measured at their nomi- nal values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement. Liabilities recognized in respect of employee benefits that are not expected to be settled within twelve months are measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the Company in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. (m) Provisions Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation, legal or constructive, as a result of past events for which it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where a provision is measured us- ing the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying value is the present value of those cash flows. (n) Restoration and Rehabilitation A provision for restoration and rehabilitation is recognized when there is a present obligation as a result of exploration, development and production activities undertaken, that it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount of the provision can be measured reliably. The estimated future obligations include the costs of removing facilities, abandoning sites and restoring the affected areas. The provision for future restoration costs is the best estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the restoration obligation at the reporting date, based on current legal or constructive obligation. Future restoration costs are re- viewed each reporting period and any changes in the estimate are reflected in the present value of the restoration provision at each reporting date. (o) income tax Current Income Tax Current income tax is calculated by reference to the amount of income taxes payable or recoverable in respect of the taxable profit or tax loss for the period. Current income tax is calcu- lated on the basis of the law enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Deferred Income Tax Deferred income tax is recognized, in accordance with the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. The tax base of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability for tax purposes. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements 39 against which the temporary differences can be utilized. Howev- er, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither the accounting nor the taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the report- ing date and expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. (p) Financial instruments Investments are recognized and de-recognized on the trade date where the purchase or sale of an investment is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs except for those financial assets classified as fair value through com- prehensive income/(loss). Fair Value Through Profit or Loss Upon disposal of an investment, the difference in the net dis- posal proceeds and the carrying amount is charged or credited to the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). Loans and Receivables Trade and other receivables, loans, cash and cash equiva- lents, short-term investments and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as “loans and receivables”. Loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method less impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest method. Available For Sale Financial Assets Certain shares held by the Company are classified as being available-for-sale and are stated at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognized directly in the investment revaluation reserve with the exception of impair- ment losses, interest calculated using the effective interest method and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary assets; all of which are recognized directly in profit or loss. Where the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in the investment revaluation reserve is included in profit or loss for the period. Effective Interest Method The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including fees on points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the finan- cial asset or, where appropriate, a shorter period. Impairment of Financial Assets Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting date. Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset and that event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset that can be reliably estimated. For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of financial assets including uncol- lectible trade receivables is reduced by the impairment loss through the use of an allowance account. Subsequent recov- eries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss. With the exception of available-for-sale equity instruments, if, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent the carrying amount of the invest- ment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized. In respect of available-for-sale equity instruments, any subsequent increase in fair value after an impairment loss is recognized directly in Other comprehensive income/(loss). De-recognition of Financial Assets The Company de-recognizes a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another entity. The Company enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to gold and oil price risk, including gold forward contracts and oil hedge contracts. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt40 Derivative Financial Instruments Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remea- sured to their fair value at each reporting date. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income/(loss) immediately as the Company does not apply hedge accounting. The fair value of derivatives is presented as a non-current asset or a non-current liability, if the remaining maturity of the instru- ment is more than twelve months and it is not expected to be realized or settled within twelve months and as a current asset or liability when the remaining maturity of the instrument is less than twelve months. Debt and Equity Instruments Debt and equity instruments are classified as either liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contrac- tual arrangement. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial Guarantee Contract Liabilities Financial guarantee contract liabilities are measured initially at their fair values and subsequently at the higher of: • the amount of the obligation under the contract, as deter- mined under IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”; and • the amount initially recognized less, where appropriate, cumulative amortization in accordance with the revenue recognition policies described in Note 4(s). Financial Liabilities Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities “at fair value through profit or loss” or other financial liabilities. Other Financial Liabilities Other financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially mea- sured at fair value, net of transaction costs. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at am- ortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an effective yield basis. The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability or, where appropriate, a shorter period. (q) share-Based Payment The Company operates an equity-settled, share-based com- pensation plan for remuneration of its management, directors, employees and consultants. The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes model, taking into account the terms and condi- tions upon which the options are granted. The fair value of the options is adjusted by the estimate of the number of options that are expected to vest as a result of non-market conditions and is expensed over the vesting period using an accelerated method of amortization. Share-based compensation relating to stock options is charged to the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). (r) Fixed Bonus Plan Units The Company operates a cash-settled, share-based compen- sation plan for remuneration of its management, directors, employees and consultants. The fair value of the Fixed Bonus Plan Units (“Units”) granted is measured using the Black-Scholes model, taking into ac- count the terms and conditions upon which the Units are granted. The fair value of the Units is adjusted by the estimate of the number of Units that are expected to vest as a result of non-market conditions and is expensed over the vesting period using an accelerated method of amortization. Share-based compensation relating to the Fixed Bonus Plan is charged to the statement of comprehensive income/(loss) and re-valued at the end of each reporting period based on the period-end share price. (s) Revenue Recognition Gold and Silver Bullion Sales Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence exists that all of the following criteria are met: • the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the product have been transferred to the buyer; • neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership, nor effective control over the gold or silver sold, has been retained; • the amount of revenue can be measured reliably; • it is probable that the economic benefit associated with the sale will flow to the Company; and • the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the sale can be measured reliably. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements41 Interest Income Interest income is recognized on a time proportionate basis taking into account the effective yield on the financial assets. (t) exploration and evaluation Exploration and evaluation expenditures in relation to each separate area of interest are expensed in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) until the determina- tion of the technical feasibility and the commercial viability of the project. The technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource is considered to be determinable when proven reserves are determined to exist, the rights of tenure are current and it is considered probable that the costs will be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area, or alternatively by sale of the property. Once the technical feasibili- ty study is completed, subsequent exploration and development expenses are capitalized as mine development expenditures. Upon reaching commercial production, these capitalized costs will be transferred from mine development expenditures to producing properties on the consolidated statement of financial position and will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated ore reserves. Exploration and evaluation assets comprise of costs incurred to secure the mining concession, acquisition of rights to explore, studies, exploratory drilling, trenching and sampling and associ- ated activities and an allocation of depreciation and amortiza- tion of assets used in exploration and evaluation activities. General and administrative costs are only included in explora- tion and evaluation costs where they are related directly to the operational activities in a particular area of interest. (u) earnings Per share Basic earnings per share are determined by dividing the profit/ (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary common shares out- standing during the financial period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weight- ed average number of common shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential common shares. (v) Joint Venture arrangements Interests in jointly controlled assets in which the Company is a venturer and has joint control are included in the consolidated financial statements by recognizing the Company’s share of jointly controlled assets (classified according to their nature), the share of liabilities incurred (including those incurred jointly with other venturers) and the Company’s share of expenses incurred by or in respect of each joint venture. The Company’s interests in assets where the Company does not have joint control are accounted for in accordance with the substance of the Company’s interest. Where such arrange- ments give rise to an undivided interest in the individual assets and liabilities of the joint venture, the Company recognizes its undivided interest in each asset and liability and classifies and presents those items according to their nature. (w) Government Royalties Royalties are accrued and charged against earnings when the liability from production of the gold arises. Royalties are separately reported as expenses and not included within revenue. 5. cHanGe in accOUntinG POlicies (a) exploration and evaluation expenditures expensed Effective October 1, 2010, exploration and evaluation expendi- tures in relation to each separate area of interest are expensed as exploration costs in the consolidated statement of compre- hensive income/(loss) until the determination of the technical feasibility and the commercial viability of the project. Under MDL’s previous policy, exploration and evaluation expenditures were recognized as an exploration and evaluation asset in the year in which they were incurred and assessed for impair- ment. As a result of the change in the accounting policy, all explora- tion costs, including concession costs, in the total amount of $27.3 million existing before October 1, 2010 and capital- ized to exploration assets were de-recognized and expensed through retained earnings. Management believes that the change in the accounting policy results in reliable and more relevant information. Had these exploration and evaluation expenditures been capitalized in the consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2011, the impact on the basic and diluted EPS would have been a reduction of the loss per share of 15 cents. (b) inventory Valuation Effective January 1, 2012, the Company changed the method of measuring and recording the cost of ore in stockpiles, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory. The new policy mea- sures and records the costs associated with ore in stockpiles, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory based on recovered ounces of gold. Under the previous policy, ore in stockpiles, gold in circuit and gold bullion costs were measured and recorded based on tonnes processed. The new policy better 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt42 matches revenue and expenses as compared to the former policy because it attaches higher costs to the higher grade ore and charges more costs to the statements of compre- hensive income/(loss) during periods that higher grade ore is processed and sold. Management believes that the change in accounting policy for inventory valuation better matches the statements of comprehensive income/(loss) and provides a more reliable measurement of ore in stockpiles, gold in circuit and gold bullion inventory. The change in accounting policy has been applied retro- actively with restatement reducing the value of inventory acquired on November 23, 2010 by $22.7 million and increasing the value of inventory as at December 31, 2011 by $5.2 million. (c) Depreciation Based on Unit of Production In line with the change in the method of measuring and recording inventory, the Company changed its accounting policy regarding units-of-production depreciation effective January 1, 2012. Under the previous method, units-of- production property, plant and equipment were amortized over the life of mine tonnes processed. Under the new policy, depreciation is based on recovered ounces of gold. Manage- ment believes that the change in accounting policy better matches revenue and costs. The change in accounting policy has been applied retroac- tively with restatement reducing the value of property, plant and equipment and mine development expenditures acquired on November 23, 2010 by $16.7 million and $9.8 million, respectively. The value of property, plant and equipment and mine development expenditures as at December 31, 2011 were further reduced by $1.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The impact of the change in accounting policies on the value of net assets acquired as at November 23, 2010, the state- ment of financial position as at December 31, 2011, the state- ment of comprehensive income/(loss) for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 and the statement of cash flows as at December 31, 2011 is set out below: imPact On net assets acQUiReD On nOVemBeR 23, 2010 november 23, 2010 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies november 23, 2010 Restated current assets Inventories total current assets non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Mine development expenditure total non-current assets total assets Non-controlling interest net assets 70,575 348,459 217,450 112,710 349,033 697,492 (1,947 ) 279,909 (22,652 ) (22,652 ) (16,683 ) (9,767 ) (26,450 ) (49,102 ) (5,089 ) (44,013 ) 47,923 325,807 200,767 102,943 322,583 648,390 (7,036 ) 235,896 Net assets acquired Less deferred compensation (C$50 million) Value of shares issued on acquisition november 23, 2010 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies november 23, 2010 Restated 279,909 (49,231 ) 230,678 (44,013 ) – (44,013 ) 235,896 (49,231 ) 186,665 teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementsimPact On statement OF Financial POsitiOn December 31, 2011 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies December 31, 2011 Restated 43 current assets Inventories total current assets non-current assets Inventories Property, plant and equipment Mine development expenditure total non-current assets total assets equity Issued capital Accumulated losses equity attributable to shareholders Non-controlling interests total equity total equity and liabilities 46,927 113,280 50,786 256,539 100,359 409,301 522,581 349,425 (46,208 ) 313,562 1,076 314,638 522,581 1,438 1,438 (18,844 ) (18,029 ) (10,534 ) (47,407 ) (45,969 ) (44,013 ) 2,833 (41,180 ) (4,789 ) (45,969 ) (45,969 ) 48,365 114,718 31,942 238,510 89,825 361,894 476,612 305,412 (43,375) 272,382 (3,713) 268,669 476,612 imPact On statement OF cOmPReHensiVe incOme/(lOss) Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies (note 4) Restatement (i) Reclassifications (note 2) Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 Restated Revenue Cost of sales Gross profit Administration expenses Net change in realized and unrealized gains/(losses) on gold hedge contracts Net change in realized and unrealized gains on oil hedge contracts Profit before income tax Profit for the period total comprehensive income for the period Profit attributable to: Shareholders Non-controlling interests Profit for the period total comprehensive profit attributable to: Shareholders Non-controlling interests 187,141 (151,033 ) 36,108 (12,043 ) 1,789 (113 ) (52,049 ) (15,941 ) (15,849 ) (2,418 ) (2,418 ) 5,550 5,550 – (2,418 ) (2,418 ) – 5,550 5,550 (18,103 ) (2,418 ) 5,550 (18,872) 3,023 (15,849) (21,126) 3,023 (2,193) (225) (2,418) (2,193) (225) 5,025 525 5,550 5,025 525 49,732 (911 ) 48,821 (1,405 ) 236,873 (148,812) 88,061 (13,448) (49,732 ) (47,943) 2,316 (48,821 ) – – – – 2,203 (100,870) (12,809) (12,717) (14,971) (16,040) 3,323 (12,717) – (18,294) 3,323 (i) In addition to the impact of the change in accounting policies and reclassifications, the consolidated statements of comprehensive income/(loss) for the year ended December 31, 2011 has been adjusted to reflect the impact of an adjustment recorded at the end of 2011 regarding the depreciation of mobile equipment. current assets Inventories total current assets non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Mine development expenditure total non-current assets total assets Non-controlling interest net assets Net assets acquired Less deferred compensation (C$50 million) Value of shares issued on acquisition november 23, 2010 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies november 23, 2010 Restated 70,575 348,459 217,450 112,710 349,033 697,492 (1,947 ) 279,909 279,909 (49,231 ) 230,678 (22,652 ) (22,652 ) (16,683 ) (9,767 ) (26,450 ) (49,102 ) (5,089 ) (44,013 ) (44,013 ) – (44,013 ) 47,923 325,807 200,767 102,943 322,583 648,390 (7,036 ) 235,896 Restated 235,896 (49,231 ) 186,665 november 23, 2010 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies november 23, 2010 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt44 imPact On statement OF casH FlOWs cash flows related to operating activities Profit/(Loss) for the period Depreciation Amortization of capitalized mine development costs Changes in working capital net cash provided by operating activities cash flows related to financing activities Interest paid on borrowings net cash used by financing activities 6. FUtURe accOUntinG POlicies iFRs 9 – Financial instruments IFRS 9, “Financial instruments” (IFRS 9) was issued by the IASB in November 2009 and will replace IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” (IAS 39). IFRS 9 replaces the multiple rules in IAS 39 with a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value and a new mixed measurement model for debt instruments having only two categories: amortized cost and fair value. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow character- istics of the financial assets. This standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 9 on its consolidated financial statements. iFRs 10 – consolidated Financial statements IFRS 10, “Consolidated financial statements” (IFRS 10) was issued by the IASB in May 2011 and will replace SIC 12, “Consolidation – Special purpose entities” and parts of IAS 27, “Consolidated and separate financial statements”. Under the existing IFRS, consolidation is required when an entity has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. IFRS 10 establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. This standard (i) requires an entity that controls one or more other entities to present consolidated financial statements; (ii) defines the principle of control, and establishes control as the basis for consolidation; (iii) sets out how to apply the principle of control to identify whether an investor controls an investee and therefore must consolidate the investee; and Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 as previously reported impact of change in accounting policies Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 Restated (15,849 ) 28,195 9,433 (29,120 ) 3,815 (931 ) 116,579 3,132 1,346 767 (3,928 ) 1,317 (1,317 ) (1,317 ) (12,717) 29,541 10,200 (33,048) 5,132 (2,248) 115,262 (iv) sets out the accounting requirements for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. IFRS 10 is effective for an- nual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Com- pany has evaluated the impact of IFRS 10 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. iFRs 11 – Joint arrangements IFRS 11, “Joint arrangements” (IFRS 11) was issued by the IASB in May 2011 and will supersede IAS 31, “Interest in joint ventures” and SIC 13, “Jointly controlled entities – Non- monetary contributions by venturers” by removing the option to account for joint ventures using proportionate consolidation and requiring equity accounting. Venturers will transition the accounting for joint ventures from the proportionate consolida- tion method to the equity method by aggregating the carrying values of the proportionately consolidated assets and liabilities into a single line item on their financial statements. In addition, IFRS 11 will require joint arrangements to be classified as ei- ther joint operations or joint ventures. The structure of the joint arrangement will no longer be the most significant factor when classifying the joint arrangement as either a joint operation or a joint venture. IFRS 11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of IFRS 11 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. iFRs 12 – Disclosure of interests in Other entities IFRS 12, “Disclosure of interests in other entities” (IFRS 12) was issued by the IASB in May 2011. IFRS 12 requires enhanced disclosure of information about involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated entities, including structured entities commonly referred to as special purpose vehicles, or variable interest entities. IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of IFRS 12 and will apply the new disclo- sure requirements for its consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of 2013. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementscash flows related to operating activities Profit/(Loss) for the period Depreciation Amortization of capitalized mine development costs Changes in working capital net cash provided by operating activities cash flows related to financing activities Interest paid on borrowings net cash used by financing activities Fifteen months ended impact of change Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 as previously reported in accounting December 31, 2011 policies Restated (15,849 ) 28,195 9,433 (29,120 ) 3,815 (931 ) 116,579 3,132 1,346 767 (3,928 ) 1,317 (1,317 ) (1,317 ) (12,717) 29,541 10,200 (33,048) 5,132 (2,248) 115,262 45 iFRs 13 – Fair Value measurement IFRS 13, “Fair value measurement” (IFRS 13) was issued by the IASB in May 2011. This standard clarifies the definition of fair value, required disclosures for fair value measurement, and sets out a single framework for measuring fair value. IFRS 13 provides guidance on fair value in a single standard, replacing the existing guidance on measuring and disclosing fair value, which is dis- persed among several standards. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of IFRS 13 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. ias 19 – employee Benefits IAS 19, “Employee benefits” (IAS 19) was re-issued by the IASB in June 2011, which results in significant changes in accounting for defined benefit pension plans. There are also a number of other changes, including modification to the timing of recognition for termination benefits, the classification of short-term employee benefits and disclosures of defined benefit plans. Furthermore, the IASB sought to provide more targeted disclosure requirements that would highlight the relevant risks of defined benefit plans. IAS 19 must be applied starting Janu- ary 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of IAS 19 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. iFRic 20 – stripping costs in the Production Phase of a surface mine In October 2011, the IASB issued IFRIC 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine. IFRIC 20 provides guidance on the accounting for the costs of stripping activity in the production phase of surface mining when two benefits accrue to the entity from the stripping activity: useable ore that can be used to produce inventory and improved access to further quantities of material that will be mined in future periods. IFRIC 20 must be applied starting January 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The Company has performed a preliminary assessment of the impact of adopting IFRIC 20 on its consolidated financial statements indicating that we will capitalize waste stripping costs, which are not permitted under our current accounting policy. ias 27 – separate Financial statements IAS 27, “Separate financial statements” (IAS 27) was re-issued by the IASB in May 2011 to only prescribe the accounting and disclosure requirements for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates when an entity prepares separate fi- nancial statements. The consolidation guidance is now included in IFRS 10. The amendments to IAS 27 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of IAS 27 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. ias 28 – investments in associates and Joint Ventures IAS 28, “Investments in associates and joint ventures” (IAS 28) was re-issued by the IASB in May 2011. IAS 28 continues to prescribe the accounting for investments in as- sociates, but is now the only source of guidance describing the application of the equity method. The amended IAS 28 will be applied by all entities that have an ownership interest with joint control of, or significant influence over, an investee. The amendments to IAS 28 are effective for annual periods begin- ning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of IAS 28 and has determined there is no impact on its consolidated financial statements. 7. cRitical accOUntinG JUDGments anD Key sOURces OF estimatiOn UnceRtainty The following are critical judgments and estimations that man- agement has made in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial state- ments and that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year: Ore Reserves Management estimates its ore reserves based upon information compiled by Competent Persons with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves and Qualified Persons as defined in NI 43-101, which is similar to the Australasian standards. The estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves are based upon interpretations of geological models and require assumptions to be made regarding factors such as estimates of short- and long-term exchange rates, estimates of short- and long-term commodity prices, future capital requirements and future operating performance. Changes in reported reserve estimates can impact the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, mine development expenditures, provision for mine restoration and rehabilitation, the recognition of deferred tax assets, as well as the amount of depreciation and amortization charged to the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt46 Functional Currency The functional currency of each of the Company’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environ- ment in which that entity operates. The functional currency of all entities within the group is the United States dollar, which was determined based on the currency that mainly influences sales prices for goods and services, labour, material and other costs and the currency in which funds from financing activities are generated. Units of Production Management estimates recovered ounces of gold in determin- ing the depreciation and amortization of mining assets. This results in a depreciation/amortization charge proportional to the recovery of the anticipated ounces of gold. The life of the asset is assessed annually and considers its physical life limi- tations and present assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the mine property at which the asset is located. The calculations require the use of estimates and assump- tions, including the amount of recoverable ounces of gold. The Company’s units of production calculations are based on recovered ounces of gold. Mine Restoration and Rehabilitation Provision Management assesses its mine restoration and rehabilitation provision each reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation as there are numerous factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable. These factors include estimates of the extent, the timing and the cost of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regulatory change, cost increases, and changes in discount rates. Those uncertainties may result in ac- tual expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. The provision at the reporting date represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future rehabilitation costs required. Changes to estimated future costs are recog- nized in the statement of financial position by adjusting the rehabilitation asset and liability. Impairment of Assets Management assesses each cash-generating unit each report- ing period to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal esti- mate of the recoverable amount is made, which is considered to be the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. These assessments require the use of estimates and as- sumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, and operating performance. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. Fair value for mineral as- sets is generally determined as the present value of estimated future cash flows arising from the continued use of the asset. Cash flows are discounted by an appropriate discount rate to determine the net present value. Management has assessed its cash generating units as being all sources of mill feed through a central mill, which is the lowest level for which cash flows are largely independent of other assets. Production Start Date Management assesses the stage of each mine development project to determine when a mine moves into the production stage. The criteria used to assess the start date of a mine are determined based on the unique nature of each mine develop- ment project. The Company considers various relevant criteria to assess when the mine is substantially complete, ready for its intended use and moves into the production phase. Some of the criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: • completion of a reasonable period of testing of the mine plant and equipment; • ability to produce metal in saleable form; and • ability to sustain ongoing production of metal. When a mine development project moves into the production stage, the capitalization of certain mine construction costs ceases and costs are either regarded as inventory or expensed, except for capitalizable costs related to mining asset additions or improvements, underground mine development or mineable reserve development. It is also at this point that depreciation/ depletion commences. Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments Management assesses the fair value of Teranga’s financial derivatives in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4(p) to the consolidated financial statements. Fair values have been determined based on well-established valuation models and market conditions existing at the reporting date. These calculations require the use of estimates and assump- tions. Changes in assumptions concerning interest rates, gold prices and volatilities could have a significant impact on the fair valuation attributed to the Company’s financial derivatives. When these assumptions change or become known in the future, such differences will impact asset and liability carrying values in the period in which they change or become known. Fair Value of Stock Options Management assesses the fair value of stock options granted in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4(q) to the consolidated financial statements. The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options are granted. The calculation requires the use of estimates and as- sumptions. Due to lack of sufficient historical information for the Company, volatility was determined using the existing historical volatility information of the Company’s share price combined with the industry average for comparable-size mining companies. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements47 Fair Value of Fixed Bonus Plan Units Management assesses the fair value of Units granted in ac- cordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4(r) to the consolidated financial statements. The fair value of the Units granted is measured using the Black-Scholes model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the Units are granted. The calculation requires the use of estimates and assumptions. Due to lack of sufficient historical informa- tion for the Company, volatility was determined using the existing historical volatility information of the Company’s share price combined with the industry average for comparable-size mining companies. 8. ReVenUe Gold sales at spot price Silver sales total revenue Interest income from bank deposits and short-term investments total other income twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 349,871 649 350,520 36 36 236,232 641 236,873 848 848 For the year ended December 31, 2012, 207,814 ounces of gold were sold at an average price of $1,634 per ounce and for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, 153,728 ounces of gold were sold at an average price of $1,537 per ounce. Revenue excludes the impact of gold hedges as losses on ounces delivered into gold hedge contracts are classified within losses on gold hedge contracts. Including the impact of gold hedge losses, for the year ended December 31, 2012, 207,814 ounces of gold were sold at an average realized price of $1,422 per ounce, including 62,606 ounces that were delivered into gold hedge contracts at $832 per ounce, representing 30 percent of gold sales for the year, and 145,208 ounces were sold into the spot market at an average price of $1,677 per ounce. Including the impact of gold hedge losses, for the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, 153,728 ounces of gold were sold at an average realized price of $1,213 per ounce, including 72,000 ounces delivered into gold hedge contracts at $846 per ounce, representing 47 percent of gold sales for the period, and 81,728 ounces of gold were sold into the spot market at an average price of $1,537 per ounce. 9. cOst OF sales Mine production costs Depreciation and amortization Royalties Rehabilitation Inventory movements total cost of sales 10. aDministRatiOn eXPenses Corporate office Dakar office Social community Professional and consulting fees Legal and other total administration expenses twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 145,831 52,660 10,491 36 (29,695 ) 179,323 126,125 40,077 7,035 9 (24,434) 148,812 twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 9,719 754 1,558 1,912 3,988 17,931 7,658 1,064 1,405 1,820 1,501 13,448 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt48 11. Finance cOsts Interest on borrowings Amortization of capitalized borrowing costs Unwinding of discount Political risk insurance Stocking fee Financial advisory services Bank charges total finance costs 12. incOme taX Current income tax expense Deferred income tax benefit on reversal of temporary differences total income tax benefit twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 4,516 877 53 898 578 427 440 7,789 1,317 328 47 1,131 – – 123 2,946 twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 (115 ) – (115 ) 139 (231) (92) The Company’s income tax benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the combined Canadian federal and provincial income tax rates to loss before income taxes as a result of the following: twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 26.5% 24,902 1,244 (37,528 ) – 11,267 – (115 ) 28.8% (4,591) – – – 4,499 – (92) Deferred income tax liabilities have not been recognized for the withholding tax and other taxes that would be payable on the unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries. Such amounts are permanently re-invested. Unremitted earnings totalled $147,137,000 at December 31, 2012. Statutory tax rates Income tax benefit computed at statutory rates Non-deductible items Income not subject to tax Difference between deferred and current rate Unrecognized deferred tax assets Other income tax benefit Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards, property, plant and equipment and the share issuance costs to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. The Company did not recognize deferred income tax assets of $9,071,000 in respect of non-capital losses, property, plant and equipment and share issuance costs amounting to $34,230,000 that can be carried forward against future taxable income, and 808,000 in respect of capital loss amounting to $6,099,000 that can be carried forward against future taxable capital gains. The non-capital losses, property, plant and equipment and share issuance costs amounting to $34,230,000 will expire in the years 2030 to 2032, and the capital losses have no expiry date. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements49 13. tRaDe anD OtHeR ReceiVaBles current Trade receivable 1 Other receivables 2 total trade and other receivables December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 5,268 1,214 6,482 17,120 3,327 20,447 1 Trade receivable relates to gold and silver shipments made prior to period-end that were settled after year-end. 2 Other receivables primarily include receivables from suppliers for services, materials and utilities used at the Sabodala gold mine that the Company provides to them. Also included are receivables from the settlement of oil hedge contracts. 14. inVentORies current Gold bullion Gold in circuit Ore stockpile total gold inventories Diesel fuel Materials and supplies Goods in transit total other inventories total current inventories non-current Ore stockpile total inventories December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 4,615 9,193 30,736 44,544 3,242 30,703 3,985 37,930 82,474 40,659 123,133 2,509 2,970 18,087 23,566 1,371 21,687 1,741 24,799 48,365 31,942 80,307 15. Financial DeRiVatiVe assets current December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Oil hedge contracts non-current Oil hedge contracts total financial derivative assets 456 – 456 2,288 532 2,820 The Company has a hedge agreement with respect to the oil price in order to manage its exposure to commodity risk. The Company hedged 80,000 barrels per annum for four years commencing April 1, 2009 at a flat forward price of $70 per barrel (West Texas Intermediate price). At December 31, 2012, the remaining 20,000 barrels hedged have a mark-to-market value of $0.5 million at the reporting date spot price of $92 per barrel. At December 31, 2011, 100,000 barrels were hedged with a market value of $2.8 million at price of $99 per barrel. 16. OtHeR assets current Prepayments 1 Security deposit 2 total other assets December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 11,396 1,500 12,896 11,251 1,500 12,751 1 As at December 31, 2012, prepayments include $6.1 million of advances for the new mining fleet, $4.3 million of advances to vendors and contractors and $1.0 million for insurance. As at December 2011, prepayments include $7.9 million of advances for the new mining fleet, $3.4 million to other vendors and contractors and $0.8 million for insurance. 2 The security deposit represents a security for payment under the mining fleet and maintenance contract. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt50 17. PROPeRty, Plant anD eQUiPment Buildings & property improvement Plant and equipment Office furniture and equipment motor vehicles equipment under finance lease capital work in progress total (note 4) cost Balance at October 1, 2010 – – – – – – – Property, plant and equipment arising from Demerger – Nov 23, 2010 Additions Capitalized mine rehabilitation 30,838 172,424 575 1,774 25,787 26,344 257,742 – – – 6,459 – – – – – – 60,825 60,825 – 6,459 Transfer 1,378 11,514 704 707 16,308 (30,611 ) – Balance at December 31, 2011 32,216 190,397 1,279 2,481 42,095 56,558 325,026 Additions Capitalized mine rehabilitation – 109 (748 ) – 12,237 85,922 525 – (227 ) 832 45,282 45,282 – – 322 (99,838 ) 109 (975) – Disposals Transfer Balance at December 31, 2012 44,453 275,680 1,804 3,086 42,417 2,002 369,442 accumulated depreciation Balance at October 1, 2010 Accumulated depreciation arising from Demerger – Nov 23, 2010 Impact on accumulated depreciation arising from Demerger (Note 5) Impact on accumulated depreciation regarding fiscal year 2011 (Note 5) – – – – – – – 4,102 25,853 399 913 9,025 – 40,292 Depreciation expense 2,701 15,973 272 466 8,783 2,750 13,933 216 1,130 – – – – – – – – – 16,683 1,346 28,195 Balance at December 31, 2011 (note 3) 9,769 56,889 671 1,379 17,808 – 86,516 Disposals (719 ) Depreciation expense 4,635 27,843 340 (192 ) 648 8,533 (911) 41,999 Balance at December 31, 2012 14,404 84,013 1,011 1,835 26,341 – 127,604 net book value Balance at December 31, 2011 22,447 133,508 608 1,102 24,287 56,558 238,510 Balance at December 31, 2012 30,049 191,667 793 1,251 16,076 2,002 241,838 Additions made to property, plant and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2012 relate mainly to the mill expansion and additional mining equipment acquired. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company has updated its estimate regarding the expected life of mine based on the proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2011 resulting in $6.1 million lower depreciation cost for property, plant and equipment depreciated using the unit-of-production method for the year ended December 31, 2012. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment of $42 million and $30 million was expensed as cost of sales for the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has property, plant and equipment that are fully amortized but still in use with a gross book value of $2.6 million. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements 18. mine DeVelOPment eXPenDitURe amount (note 4) 51 cost Balance at October 1, 2010 Mine development expenditure arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Change in accounting policy 1 Expenditures incurred during the period Balance at December 31, 2011 Expenditures incurred during the period Balance at December 31, 2012 accumulated depreciation Balance at October 1, 2010 Accumulated depreciation arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Impact on depreciation expense arising from Demerger (Note 2) Impact on depreciation expense for fiscal year 2011 (Note 2) Depreciation expense Balance at December 31, 2011 Depreciation expense Balance at December 31, 2012 carrying amount at December 31, 2011 Balance at December 31, 2012 – 127,336 (17,277) 14,359 124,418 30,377 154,795 – 14,626 9,767 767 9,433 34,593 11,142 45,735 89,825 109,060 1 Change in accounting policy effective October 1, 2010. Mine development expenditures represent development costs in relation to the Sabodala gold mine and Gora satellite deposit. The capitalized mine development expenditures incurred dur- ing 2012 include $3.0 million relating to the Gora project that was advanced from the exploration stage to the development stage effective January 1, 2012 after technical feasibility and commercial viability studies had been completed. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company has updated its estimate regarding the expected life of mine based on the proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2011 result- ing in $6.5 million lower depreciation cost for mine develop- ment expenditure for the year ended December 31, 2012. Depreciation of capitalized mine development of $11.1 million and $9.4 million were expensed as cost of sales for the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 52 19. intanGiBle assets Intangible assets represent intangible computer software. Amortization expense is included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(loss) under administration expenses. cost Balance at October 1, 2010 Intangible assets arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Additions Balance at December 31, 2011 Additions Balance at December 31, 2012 accumulated amortization Balance at October 1, 2010 Accumulated amortization arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Amortization expense Balance at December 31, 2011 Amortization expense Balance at December 31, 2012 carrying amount at December 31, 2011 at December 31, 2012 20. tRaDe anD OtHeR PayaBles current Unsecured liabilities: Trade payables 1 Sundry creditors and accrued expenses Government royalties 2 Amounts payable to Government of Senegal 3 total trade and other payables amount – 707 1,208 1,915 1,424 3,339 – 340 490 830 650 1,480 1,085 1,859 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 16,446 12,370 10,927 5,080 44,823 18,860 13,733 5,887 4,758 43,238 1 Trade payables comprise obligations by the Company to suppliers of goods and services to the Company. Terms are generally 30 days. 2 Government royalties are payable annually based on the mine head value of the gold 3 $4 million to which an annual interest rate of 6% applies is payable to the Government of Senegal relating to the historical cost of acquiring the Mine Licence. The balance was paid to the Government of Senegal in January 2013. and related substances produced. 21. BORROWinGs current Finance lease liabilities Borrowing costs total current borrowings non-current Loan facility Finance lease liabilities Borrowing costs total non-current borrowings total borrowings December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 10,506 (91) 10,415 60,000 – (1,807) 58,193 68,608 16,799 (331) 16,468 – 7,573 (64) 7,509 23,977 teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements53 property in Senegal and a pledge over all SGO’s assets in Sen- egal; (ix) an assignment by way of security of SGO’s interest in project documents including the Sabodala mining concession and the mining convention; and (x) a pledge agreement in respect of balances of local banking accounts held by SGO in Senegal. Société Générale Equipment Lease Facility During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company ex- panded the mobile equipment finance lease loan with Société Générale by an additional $12.8 million. The facility contains a quarterly repayment schedule concluding with the final pay- ment on September 30, 2013. The facility is fully drawn down to $10.5 million and repayable in 2013. The security package includes: (i) a guarantee issued by SGO to Société Générale of up to $50,000,000; (ii) a share mort- gage over all shares in SGML Capital held by Teranga; and (iii) a fixed and floating charge over all the assets of SGML Capital. December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 51,548 129,559 51,548 – 51,548 79,241 50,318 129,559 During the second quarter of 2012, the Company bought back certain “out of the money” gold forward sales contracts scheduled for delivery in 2012 totalling 52,105 ounces. Macquarie Loan Facility During the second quarter of 2012, the Company entered into a $60 million 2-year loan facility with Macquarie Bank Limited by way of an amendment to its existing Facility Agree- ment. The loan facility bears interest of LIBOR plus a margin of 10 percent and shall be repaid on or before June 30, 2014. All of the obligations under the loan facility continue due to the gold hedging contracts and oil hedge currently outstanding. The security package includes: (i) a fixed and floating charge in respect of all assets of Teranga BVI; (ii) a share mortgage in re- spect of all shares held by Teranga in Teranga BVI; (iii) a share mortgage over Teranga’s shares in SGML; (iv) a share pledge over shares in SGO held by SGML and nominated directors of Teranga and over shares in SMC held by SGML; (v) a fixed and floating charge over all assets of SGML (other than SGML’s shares in SMC); (vi) a fixed and floating charge over all SGML’s assets located outside of Mauritius; (vii) a fixed and floating charge over all assets of SGO held outside of Senegal; (viii) a mortgage of the Sabodala mining concession and certain real 22. Financial DeRiVatiVe liaBilities Gold hedge contracts Disclosed as: Current Non-current total financial derivative liabilities At December 31, 2012, the hedge position comprised 59,789 ounces of forward sales at an average price of $803 per ounce. At December 31, 2012, the mark-to-market gold hedge position at the year-end spot price of $1,664 per ounce was in a liability position of $51.5 million. At December 31, 2011, the hedge position comprised 174,500 ounce of forward sales at an average $826 per ounce. At December 31, 2011, the mark-to-market gold hedge position at the period-end spot price of $1,566 per ounce was in a liability position of $129.6 million. Accumulated amortization arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Balance at October 1, 2010 Intangible assets arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 cost Additions Additions Balance at December 31, 2011 Balance at December 31, 2012 accumulated amortization Balance at October 1, 2010 Amortization expense Balance at December 31, 2011 Amortization expense Balance at December 31, 2012 carrying amount at December 31, 2011 at December 31, 2012 current Unsecured liabilities: Trade payables 1 Sundry creditors and accrued expenses Government royalties 2 Amounts payable to Government of Senegal 3 total trade and other payables current Finance lease liabilities Borrowing costs total current borrowings non-current Loan facility Finance lease liabilities Borrowing costs total non-current borrowings total borrowings amount – 707 1,208 1,915 1,424 3,339 – 340 490 830 650 1,480 1,085 1,859 18,860 13,733 5,887 4,758 43,238 16,799 (331) 16,468 – 7,573 (64) 7,509 23,977 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 16,446 12,370 10,927 5,080 44,823 10,506 (91) 10,415 60,000 – (1,807) 58,193 68,608 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt54 23. PROVisiOns current Employee benefits 1 total current provisions non-current Mine restoration and rehabilitation 2 Cash settled share-based compensation 3 total non-current provisions total provisions 1 The provisions for employee benefits include $1.4 million accrued vacation and $0.5 million long service leave entitlements for December 31, 2012. The provision for December 31, 2011 included $1.6 million accrued vacation and $0.4 million long service leave entitlements. 2 Mine restoration and rehabilitation provision represents a constructive obligation to rehabilitate the Sabodala gold mine based on the mining concession. The majority of the reclamation activities will occur at the completion of active mining and processing (expected completion is 2019) but a limited amount of concurrent rehabilitation will occur throughout the mine life. transfer of provision from Demerger – november 23, 2010 Additional provisions recognized Capitalized mine rehabilitation Unwinding of discount Balance at December 31, 2011 Capitalized mine rehabilitation Unwinding of discount Balance at December 31, 2012 24. issUeD caPital common shares issued and outstanding Balance at October 1, 2010 Shares issued on incorporation of the Company Shares issued from initial public offering Less: Share issue costs Shares issued on Demerger (Note 2) Balance at December 31, 2011 Balance at December 31, 2012 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 1,940 1,940 9,377 935 10,312 12,252 1,954 1,954 9,215 – 9,215 11,169 3 The provision for cash settled share-based compensation represents the amortization of the fair value of the Fixed Bonus Plan Units. Details of the Fixed Bonus Plan are disclosed in Note 36(b). amount 2,284 425 6,459 47 9,215 109 53 9,377 amount (note 4) – – 135,005 (16,258) 186,665 305,412 305,412 number of shares – 100 45,617,900 – 200,000,000 245,618,000 245,618,000 On November 23, 2010, Teranga completed the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and a regional exploration package by way of Demerger from MDL. As part of the Demerger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sabodala Gold (Mauri- tius) Limited, which holds a 90% interest in the Sabodala Gold Operations SA (“SGO”), which owns the Sabodala gold mine, and a 100% interest in the Sabodala Mining Company SARL, an exploration entity, all of the issued and outstanding shares of SGML (Capital) Limited and 18,699,500 common shares of Oromin, originally held by MDL, were transferred to Teranga in consideration for the issuance of 200,000,000 common shares to MDL and C$50 million in satisfaction of a promis- sory note owing to MDL. On December 7, 2010 the Company completed initial public offerings in Canada and Australia. In Canada, after the exercise of the over-allotment option, a total of 36,617,900 common shares were issued for gross proceeds of AUS$109.9 million. In Australia, 9,000,000 common shares were issued for gross proceeds of A$26.7 million. The share is- suance costs related to the public offerings were $16.3 million. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementscurrent Employee benefits 1 total current provisions non-current Mine restoration and rehabilitation 2 Cash settled share-based compensation 3 total non-current provisions total provisions December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 1,940 1,940 9,377 935 10,312 12,252 1,954 1,954 9,215 – 9,215 11,169 common shares issued and outstanding Balance at October 1, 2010 Shares issued on incorporation of the Company Shares issued from initial public offering Less: Share issue costs Shares issued on Demerger (Note 2) Balance at December 31, 2011 Balance at December 31, 2012 number of shares – 100 – 45,617,900 200,000,000 245,618,000 245,618,000 amount (note 4) – – 135,005 (16,258) 186,665 305,412 305,412 55 The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares with no par value. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to one vote for each Common Share on all matters to be voted on by shareholders at meetings of the Company’s shareholders. All dividends that the Board of Directors may declare shall be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on all Common Shares at the time out- standing. There are no pre-emptive, redemption or conver- sion rights attached to the Common Shares. All Common Shares, when issued, are and will be issued as fully paid and non-assessable shares without liability for further calls or to assessment. 25. aVailaBle FOR sale Financial assets As part of the acquisition of the Sabodala gold mine and regional land package by way of Demerger from MDL, Teranga acquired 18,699,500 common shares of Oromin Exploration Limited (“OLE”), classified as available for sale in accordance with IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. At the end of the second quarter of 2012, OLE shares traded 56 percent lower than the share price at the date of acquisi- tion and 50 percent lower than at the beginning of 2012. As a result of the significant and prolonged decline in the share price, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment loss of $11.9 million on the OLE shares. In the third and fourth quarters of 2012, OLE shares appreci- ated in value and gains of $3.4 million and $2.1 million, respec- tively, were recorded in Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, a gain of $6.8 million, net of tax of $nil was recognized in Other Com- prehensive Income/(Loss) for the change in fair value of avail- able for sale financial assets, which includes the reclassifica- tion of $5.2 million to impairment of available for sale financial assets. For the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011, a loss of $1.3 million, net of tax of $nil was recognized. The following table outlines the change in fair value of the investment in OLE: Balance at October 1, 2010 Acquisition of OLE arising from Demerger – November 23, 2010 Change in fair value during the period Foreign exchange gain Balance at December 31, 2011 Change in fair value of available for sale financial assets during period Foreign exchange gain Balance at march 31, 2012 Change in fair value of available for sale financial assets during period Foreign exchange loss Balance at June 30, 2012 Change in fair value of available for sale financial assets during period Foreign exchange gain Balance at september 30, 2012 Change in fair value of available for sale financial assets during period Foreign exchange loss Balance at December 31, 2012 amount – 21,109 (1,319 ) 10 19,800 (3,927) 440 16,313 (6,671) (339) 9,303 3,407 405 13,115 2,049 (154) 15,010 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt56 26. ReseRVe The foreign currency translation reserve represents historical exchange differences of $0.9 million, which arose upon trans- lation from the functional currency of the Company’s corporate entity into U.S. dollars during 2011, which were recorded directly to the foreign currency translation reserve within the consolidated statement of changes in equity. The remaining balance of $0.1 million represents foreign exchange difference resulting from the change of functional currency from Cana- dian to U.S. dollars as at January 1, 2012. 27. eaRninGs/(lOss) PeR sHaRe twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 Basic EPS/(LPS) (US$) Diluted EPS/(LPS) (US$) Basic EPS/(LPS): Net profit/(loss) used in the calculation of basic EPS/(LPS) Weighted average number of common shares for the purposes of basic EPS/ (LPS) (’000) Weighted average number of common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS/ (LPS) (’000) 0.33 0.33 79,924 245,618 245,618 (0.07) (0.07) (16,040) 245,618 245,618 The determination of weighted average number of common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS/(LPS) excludes 17 million and 18 million shares relating to share options that were anti-dilutive for the periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 28. DiViDenDs During the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, no dividends were paid. 29. cOmmitments FOR eXPenDitURe (a) capital expenditure commitments Sabodala Gold Mine – expansion Additional mining equipment total payments due within one year (b) exploration commitments The Company has committed to spend a total of $2.3 million over the next year in respect of the Sabodala regional exploration program. (c) sabodala Operating commitments The Company has the following operating commitments in respect of the Sabodala gold operation: • Pursuant to the Company’s Mining Concession, a royalty of 3% is payable to the Government of Senegal based on the value of gold shipments, evaluated at the spot price on the shipment date. as at December 31, 2012 600 7,300 7,900 • $425,000 per annum on social development of local authorities in the surrounding Tambacounda region during the term of the Mining Concession. • $30,000 per year for logistical support of the territorial administration of the region from date of notification of the Mining Concession. • $200,000 per year on training of Directorate of Mines and Geology officers and Mines Ministry. (d) letter of credit As at December 31, 2012, SGO had a letter of credit of $1.5 million outstanding as a requirement by a third party supplier for purchases made by the Company. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements Basic EPS/(LPS) (US$) Diluted EPS/(LPS) (US$) Basic EPS/(LPS): (LPS) (’000) (LPS) (’000) Net profit/(loss) used in the calculation of basic EPS/(LPS) Weighted average number of common shares for the purposes of basic EPS/ Weighted average number of common shares for the purpose of diluted EPS/ twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 0.33 0.33 79,924 245,618 245,618 (0.07) (0.07) (16,040) 245,618 245,618 57 30. leases (a) Operating lease commitments The Company has entered into an agreement to lease prem- ises until February 28, 2019. The annual rent of premises consists of minimum rent plus realty taxes, maintenance and utilities. In accordance with the lease agreement the amount of $387,000 is payable within a year, and remaining $2,062,000 is payable from 2014 to 2019. During the period ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to lease an office space in Dakar, Senegal expiring April 30, 2014 with an option to renew for an additional three years. In accordance with the lease agree- ment the amount of $109,000 is payable within a year and remaining $36,000 is payable in 2014. The Company recognized $0.5 million and $0.4 million as rental expense in the statement of comprehensive income/ (loss) for the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (b) Finance lease liabilities December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 minimum future lease payments Present value of minimum future lease payments minimum future lease payments Present value of minimum future lease payments No later than one year Later than one year and not later than five years total finanace lease liabilities Included in the financial statements as: Current Non-current 10,506 – 10,506 10,506 – 10,415 – 10,415 10,415 – 16,799 7,573 24,372 16,799 7,573 16,468 7,509 23,977 16,468 7,509 The finance loan relates to the Mining Fleet Sublease with a remaining lease term of nine months expiring September 2013. Mini- mum future lease payments consist of three payments over the term of the loan. Interest is calculated at LIBOR plus a margin paid quarterly in arrears. Due to the variable nature of the interest repayments the table above excludes all future interest amounts. 31. cOntinGent liaBilities The Company confirmed directly or via its holding subsidiaries that it will continue to provide financial support to its subsid- iaries to enable them to meet their obligations as they fall due for a period of not less than 12 months. Subsequent to year-end in January 2013, Sabodala Mining Company SARL (“SMC”) received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authorities of approximately $6 million (includ- ing penalties) claiming withholding tax on payments made to foreign service providers. We have reviewed the assess- ment with our legal counsel and are confident that they are primarily without merit. This matter is still being reviewed and considered with the Tax authorities in Senegal and Teranga is committed to paying all taxes deemed legitimately due. SMC responded to the tax assessment in February 2013 chal- lenging all of it except for approximately $50,000 relating to withholding taxes on payments made in 2008. In December 2012, Sabodala Gold Operations SA (“SGO”) received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authori- ties claiming withholding taxes of approximately $6 million on amounts considered as distributions, contribution of land built properties, withholding tax on salaries, withholding tax on payments made to foreign providers and special contributions on mining products. SGO responded to the tax assessment including evidence supporting treatment of withholding taxes in accordance with the General Tax Code in Senegal. We have reviewed the assessment with our legal counsel and are confident that they are without merit and that these issues will be resolved with no or an immaterial amount of tax due. In January 2012, the Official Journal of the Republic of Sen- egal issued notice of a new financial act that would impose a 5 percent “contribution” on the sale of products from mines and quarries. In April SGO received an official request by the 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt58 tax authorities in Senegal, followed by a follow-up request in May for payment of 5 percent of gold sales completed in March pursuant to this new financial act. SGO has challenged the as- sessment under this new 5 percent tax citing the fiscal stability provisions included in its Sabodala Mining Convention, based on the opinions received from both national and international counsel. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Government of Senegal issued a second assessment relating to gold sales during the second quarter. Should this issue not be resolved with the Government of Senegal, we can appeal the govern- ment’s decision to apply the tax to the International Chamber of Commerce of Paris pursuant to our rights under our Sabodala Mining Convention. During 2012, the Government of Senegal began enforcement measures against all mining companies impacted by this new tax on mining products. The Government of Senegal has collected a total of $850,000 from the Company in partial satisfaction of amounts assessed to June 30, 2012. The potential impact to the Company’s earnings and total cash costs per ounce is approximately $11.6 million and $60 per ounce of gold sold, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s Consolidated Statement of Compre- hensive Income/(Loss) does not reflect this potential impact as management believes that the special contribution tax should not apply to SGO given the fiscal stability provision in its mining convention. The Company continues to challenge the validity of the application of this tax to Sabodala Gold Operations given fis- cal stability protections in its Mining Convention and anticipates that a resolution of the matter will be reached with the Govern- ment in due course. During the year 2011, SGO received a tax assessment from the Senegalese tax authorities claiming withholding taxes of approximately $24 million relating to interest paid to SGML Capital under the Mining Fleet Lease facility, directors’ fees and services rendered by offshore companies. SGO responded to the tax assessment including evidence supporting treatment of withholding taxes in accordance with the General Tax Code in Senegal. In January 2012 the tax assessment was re-confirmed by the Senegalese tax authorities. We have reviewed the alleged breaches identified by the Senegalese tax authorities with our legal counsel and are confident that they are without merit and that these issues will be resolved with no or an immaterial amount of tax due. As a result, in February 2012 SGO filed a notice to refer the tax assessment to arbitration in accordance with Senegalese laws. The arbitration ruling is appealable to the International Chamber of Commerce of Paris. To date, Sen- egalese authorities have failed to respond to our requests for a resolution on this matter. 32. eXPlORatiOn licenses anD JOintly cOntROlleD OPeRatiOns anD assets The Company has exploration licenses and is a venturer in the following jointly controlled operations and assets: name of Venture Dembala Berola Massakounda Senegal Nominees JV – Bransan NAFPEC JV – Makana AXMIN JV – Sabodala NW 1 AXMIN JV - Heremakono AXMIN JV - Sounkounkou Bransan Sud Sabodala Ouest Saiansoutou Garaboureya North 1 The permit for AXMIN JV – Sabodala NW expired and the Company has applied for an extension. exploration commitments and contingent liabilities Exploration commitments and contingent liabilities are disclosed in Note 29. Principal activity interest 2012 % Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration Gold exploration 100 100 70 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 75 teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements 33. cOntROlleD entities controlled entities consolidated Teranga Gold B.V.I. 1 Teranga Gold (USA) Corporation Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited 2 SGML (Capital) Limited Subsidiaries of Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) limited: Sabodala Mining Company SARL 2 Sabodala Gold Operations SA 3 59 country of incorporation Percentage owned 2012 B.V.I. USA Mauritius Mauritius Senegal Senegal 100 100 100 100 100 90 1 Teranga Gold (B.V.I.) Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Teranga Gold Corporation, was incorporated under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 on November 10, 2010. In connection with the Demerger Arrangement and pursuant to a deed of assignment of debt among Teranga Gold Corporation, Teranga Gold (B.V.I) Corporation, MDL Gold Limited, Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited and Sabodala Gold Operations SA dated November 23, 2010, Teranga Gold (B.V.I.) Corporation took assignment of an inter-corporate receivable of $234,300,000 owed by Sabodala Gold Operations SA to Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited as assigned to MDL Gold Limited in consideration for 1,000,000 ordinary shares of Teranga Gold (B.V.I.) Corporation registered in the name of Teranga Gold Corporation. 2 Pursuant to the Uniform Act (OHADA) governing the Company’s “SA” Senegalese subsidiaries, the Board of Directors must have at least three and no more than 12 directors (other than in particular circumstances). Members of the Board do not have to be shareholders; however, no more than one-third of the members of the Board may be non-shareholders. Teranga is the majority (90%) shareholder of SGO through its wholly owned subsidiary Sabodala Gold (Mauritius) Limited. A sufficient number of directors representing SGML (the Mauritius holding company) were elected to the Board of Directors of SGO, in addition to the two resident directors with executive responsibility, to ensure adequate representation at all Board meetings, the minority shareholder (Republic of Senegal) being entitled to two Board seats, one representing the State and the other being held by a non-shareholder Senegalese public servant. To meet the requisite shareholder requirement for the Board of Directors of SGO, five of the current Board members (4 of which are also directors of SGML) were issued one share each for a total of 0.5% in SGO with the other 89.5% issued to and held by the Mauritian parent SGML. On death or resignation, a share individually held would be transferred to another representative of SGML or added to its current 89.5% shareholding according to the circumstances at the time. 3 Under the terms of the SGO project finance facility, SGML and SGO have pledged their shares in favour of Macquarie Bank Limited as security. 34. casH FlOW inFORmatiOn (a) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents Cash at the end of the reporting period as shown in the statement of cash flows is reconciled to items in the statement of financial position as follows: Cash at bank Short-term investments with maturity less than 90 days total cash and cash equivalents December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 39,722 – 39,722 5,780 1,690 7,470 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt60 (b) Reconciliation of change in Working capital changes in working capital Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables Decrease/(increase) in other assets Increase in inventories Increase in trade and other payables Increase in provisions net increase in working capital (c) cash Balances Restricted For Use twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 13,965 5,915 (42,826) 5,660 1,030 (16,256) (18,707) (10,062) (25,869) 21,332 258 (33,048) During the second quarter of 2012, the Company amended its existing Facility Agreement with Macquarie Bank Limited. As part of the amendment, Macquarie Bank Limited has agreed to recognize Project Completion as occurring and to remove the requirement to hold the restricted cash. As at December 31, 2012, the Company had no restrictions on cash balances (2011 – $3.0 million). 35. Financial instRUments The Company’s risk exposures and the impact on the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below: (a) capital Risk management The Company’s objectives when managing its capital are to safe- guard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern while maximizing the return to stakeholders through optimization of the debt and equity balance. The capital structure of the Company consists of cash and cash equivalents, debt, and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and accumulated losses. The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements. Management believes that the cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2012, together with expected future cash flows from operations is sufficient to support the Company’s liquidity requirements. The leverage ratio as at December 31, 2012 was as follows: Borrowings Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments net cash equity attributable to the shareholders net cash to equity ratio December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 (68,608) 39,722 – (28,886) 362,777 –8% (23,977) 7,470 593 (15,914) 272,382 –6% teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementschanges in working capital Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables Decrease/(increase) in other assets Increase in inventories Increase in trade and other payables Increase in provisions net increase in working capital 13,965 5,915 (42,826) 5,660 1,030 (16,256) (18,707) (10,062) (25,869) 21,332 258 (33,048) Borrowings Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments net cash equity attributable to the shareholders net cash to equity ratio December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 (68,608) 39,722 – (28,886) 362,777 –8% (23,977) 7,470 593 (15,914) 272,382 –6% twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s financial instruments consisted of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables, borrowings and derivative financial assets and liabilities. (b) categories of Financial instruments The following table illustrates the classification of the Company’s financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011: December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 61 Financial assets: Loans and receivables Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash Short-term investments Trade and other receivable Assets at fair value through profit or loss Financial derivative assets Available-for-sale Available-for-sale financial assets Financial liabilities: Other financial liabilities at amortized cost Borrowings Trade and other payables Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss Financial derivative liabilities (c) commodity market Risk 39,722 – – 6,482 456 15,010 68,608 44,823 51,548 7,470 3,004 593 20,447 2,820 19,800 23,977 43,238 129,559 Market risk represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of financial instruments. The Com- pany’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company is exposed to movements in the gold price. As part of the risk management policy the Company has entered into gold forward sales contracts and oil hedge contracts to reduce exposure to unpredictable market fluctuations. The Company has elected not to apply hedge accounting for these instruments. Derivative Financial instruments Financial derivative assets: Oil hedge contracts Disclosed as: Current Non-current Financial derivative liabilities: Gold flat forward contracts Disclosed as: Current Non-current December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 456 456 – 2,820 2,288 532 51,548 129,559 51,548 – 79,241 50,318 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt62 Gold Forward contracts and Oil Hedge contracts December 31, 2012 Gold Forward contracts December 31, 2012 Oil Hedge contracts Ounces Us$/Ounce Fair Value BBl Us$/BBl Fair Value Within 1 year Between 1 and 2 years total 59,789 – 59,789 803 – 803 51,548 20,000 – – 51,548 20,000 70 – 70 456 – 456 December 31, 2011 Gold Forward contracts Ounces $/Ounce Fair Value Within 1 year Between 1 and 2 years total 108,500 66,000 174,500 837 807 826 79,241 50,318 129,559 100,000 BBl 80,000 20,000 December 31, 2011 Oil Hedge contracts $/BBl Fair Value 70 70 70 2,288 532 2,820 At December 31, 2012, the gold spot price was $1,644 per ounce and the oil price was $92 per barrel. As the Company has elected not to adopt hedge accounting, movements in the fair value of these contracts are accounted for through the statement of comprehensive income/(loss). Sensitivity Analysis The following table summarizes the sensitivity of financial assets and financial liabilities held at reporting date to movement in gold and oil commodity rates, with all other variables held constant. A 10% movement for gold and oil rates represents management’s assessment of the reasonably possible change. Gold forward contracts Profit or loss Other equity Oil hedge contracts Profit or loss Other equity December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Financial assets Financial liabilities – – 186 – – – 978 – 9,934 27,289 – – – – – – teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements 63 (d) Foreign currency Risk management The Company has certain financial instruments denominated in CFA Franc, EUR, CAD, AUD and other currencies. Conse- quently, the Company is exposed to the risk that the exchange rate of the USD relative to the CFA Franc, CAD, AUD, EUR and other currencies may change in a manner that has a material effect on the reported values of the Company’s assets and li- abilities, which are denominated in the CFA Franc, EUR, CAD, AUD and other currencies. The carrying amounts of the Company’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are as follows: CAD CFA Franc (XOF) AUD EUR Other December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Financial assets Financial liabilities 483 2,349 213 1,486 250 2,627 4,494 837 189 963 2,398 30,672 898 3,714 118 2,204 23,118 3,809 6,357 1,449 Foreign Currency Sensitivity Analysis The Company is mainly exposed to CFA Franc, CAD, AUD and EUR. Ten percent represents management’s assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates. Sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at period-end for a 10% change in the functional currency rates. A negative number indicates a decrease in profit or equity where the functional currency strengthens 10% against the relevant currency for financial assets and where the functional currency weakens against the relevant currency for financial liabilities. For a 10% weakening of USD against the relevant currency for financial assets and a 10% strengthening for financial liabilities, there would be an equal and opposite impact on net assets and the balances would be positive. December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Financial assets Financial liabilities cFa Franc (XOF) impact Profit or loss Other equity eUR impact Profit or loss Other equity caD impact Profit or loss Other equity aUD impact Profit or loss Other equity 235 – 149 – 48 – 21 – 449 – 19 – 263 – 84 – 3,067 – 371 – 240 – 90 – 2,312 – 636 – 220 – 381 – Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts The Company has not entered into forward exchange contracts to buy or sell specified amounts of foreign currencies in the future at stipulated exchange rates. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt64 (e) interest Rate Risk management Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instru- ment will fluctuate because of changes in the market interest rates. The Company has exposure to interest rate risk relating to its bank balances and external borrowings. The following table illustrates the classification of the Com- pany’s financial instruments which are exposed to interest rate risk as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Restricted cash total Financial liabilities Borrowings total 39,722 – – 39,722 68,608 (28,886) 7,470 593 3,004 11,067 23,977 (12,910) The Company’s interest rate on its borrowings is calculated at LIBOR plus 3 percent, 4.25 percent or 10 percent margin. Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis If interest rates had been higher or lower by 50 basis points and all other variables were held constant, the profit and net assets would increase or decrease by: Profit or loss Other equity Financial assets Financial liabilities December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 131 – 279 – 312 – 107 – (f) credit Risk management The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, cash equivalents and derivative financial instruments. The Company does not have any significant credit risk exposure as cash and cash equivalents are held with Canadian banks. The Company has adopted a strategy to minimize its credit risk by substantially investing in sovereign debt issued by Canadian Agencies, Provinces and the Federal Governments of Canada. The Company does not have significant credit risk exposure on accounts receivable as all gold sales are executed through Macquarie Bank, a AAA-rated bank. Gold production is either delivered into forward sales contracts with Macquarie or sold (g) liquidity Risk management into the spot market and deposited into the Company’s bank account. The Company is exposed to the credit risk of Senegal and France banks that disburse cash on behalf of its Senegal subsidiaries. The Company manages its Senegal and France bank credit risk by centralizing custody, control and manage- ment of its surplus cash resources in Canada at the corporate office and only transferring money to its subsidiary based on immediate cash requirements, thereby mitigating exposure to Senegal banks. Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they fall due. The Company monitors its risk of a shortage using projected cash flows and by monitor- ing the maturity of both its financial assets and liabilities. Cash flow forecasting is performed in the operating entity of the group and combined by the Company’s finance group. The Company’s finance group monitors the liquidity require- ments to ensure it has sufficient cash to meet operational needs while maintaining sufficient headroom in its proceeds account so that the Company does not breach any of its cov- enants. Surplus cash held by the Corporate office is invested in short-term investments issued by Canadian bank and in sovereign debt issued by Canadian Agencies, Provinces and the Federal Governments of Canada. teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statementsFinancial assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Restricted cash total Financial liabilities Borrowings total December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 39,722 – – 39,722 68,608 (28,886) 7,470 593 3,004 11,067 23,977 (12,910) 65 Liquidity Tables The following tables detail the Company’s remaining contractual maturity for its financial liabilities. The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Company can be re- quired to pay. The table includes both interest and principal cash flows. Weighted average effective interest rate % Due on demand Due one to three months Due between three months to one year Due one to five years Financial liabilities December 31, 2012 Non–interest bearing Variable interest rate instruments Variable interest rate instruments Fixed interest rate instruments Variable interest rate instruments Derivatives 1 total December 31, 2011 Non–interest bearing Variable interest rate instruments Fixed interest rate instruments Derivatives 1 total Financial assets December 31, 2012 Non–interest bearing Derivatives 2 total December 31, 2011 Non–interest bearing Derivatives 2 total 1 Expected to be settled through delivery of gold. 2 Expected to be settled in cash on a net basis. – 3.31 % 4.46 % 6.00 % 10.31 % – – 3.37 % 6.00 % – 30,121 – – 3,776 – – 33,897 33,742 – – – 33,742 – 2,400 2,133 – – 15,702 20,235 – 2,800 2,707 – 5,507 10,927 1,706 4,266 – – 35,846 52,745 5,887 13,999 902 79,241 100,029 – – – – 60,000 – 60,000 – 7,573 – 50,318 57,891 Weighted average effective interest rate % Due on demand Due one to three months Due between three months to one year Due one to five years – – – – 6,482 – 6,482 20,447 – 20,447 – 456 456 – 584 584 – – – – 1,704 1,704 – – – – 532 532 Management considers that the Company has adequate current assets and forecasted cash flow from operations to manage liquidity risks arising from settlement of current and non-current liabilities. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt66 (h) Fair Value of Financial instruments The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities are determined as follows: • the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities with standard terms and conditions and traded on active liquid markets are determined with reference to quoted market prices; and • the fair value of derivative instruments are calculated using quoted prices and option pricing models. Management considers that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at amortized cost in the financial statements approximate their fair value for the Company, as they represent short-term trade amounts. Fair Value Hierarchy The Company values instruments carried at fair value using quoted market prices, where available. Quoted market prices represent a Level 1 valuation. When quoted market prices are not available, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs within valuation models. When all significant inputs are observable, the valuation is classified as Level 2. Valuations that require the significant use of unobservable inputs are considered Level 3. The following table outlines financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statements and the level of the inputs used to determine those fair values in the context of the hierarchy as defined above: December 31, 2012 Available for sale financial assets Derivative financial assets total December 31, 2011 Available for sale financial assets Derivative financial assets total December 31, 2012 Derivative financial liabilities total December 31, 2011 Derivative financial liabilities total level 1 level 2 level 3 total Financial assets 15,010 – 15,010 19,800 – 19,800 – 456 456 – 2,820 2,820 – – – – – – 15,010 456 15,466 19,800 2,820 22,620 level 1 level 2 level 3 total Financial liabilities – – – – 51,548 51,548 129,559 129,559 – – – – 51,548 51,548 129,559 129,559 teranga gold corporation / notes to consolidated financial statements67 36. sHaRe-BaseD cOmPensatiOn During the third quarter of 2012, the Company introduced a new Fixed Bonus Plan as an alternative to the Company’s exist- ing share-based compensation program. Directors, officers, employees and consultants are entitled to receive either stock options under the current Stock Option Plan or Fixed Bonus Plan Units under the new Fixed Bonus Plan. The share-based compensation expense for the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totalled $4.7 million and $12.4 million, respectively. (a) incentive stock Option Plan The Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) authorizes the Di- rectors to grant options to purchase shares of the Company to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. The exercise price of the options is deter- mined by the Board of Directors at the date of grant but in no event shall be less than the five-day weighted average closing price of the common shares as reported on TSX for the period ended on the business day immediately preceding the day on which the option was granted. The vesting of options is determined by the Board of Directors at the date of grant. The term of options granted under the Plan is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, provided that such term cannot exceed ten years from the date the option is granted. Each employee share option is convertible into one ordinary share of Teranga on exercise. No amounts are paid or payable by the recipient on receipt of the option. The options carry neither rights to dividends nor voting rights. Options may be exercised at any time from the date of vesting to the date of their expiry subject to the terms of the plan. During the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, a total of 3,580,000 and 17,980,000 common share options respectively were granted to directors and employees. During the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, a total of 4,058,055 and 362,778 options were forfeited, respectively. No stock options were exercised during the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The following stock options were outstanding as at December 31, 2012: Option series number Grant date expiry date exercise price (c$) FV at grant date (c$) Granted on November 26, 2010 Granted on December 3, 2010 Granted on February 9, 2011 Granted on April 27, 2011 Granted on June 14, 2011 Granted on August 13, 2011 8,513,334 2,225,000 725,000 113,889 455,000 370,000 Granted on December 20, 2011 1,792,778 Granted on February 24, 2012 Granted on February 24, 2012 Granted on June 5, 2012 Granted on September 27, 2012 Granted on October 9, 2012 Granted on October 31, 2012 Granted on October 31, 2012 Granted on December 3, 2012 934,166 300,000 50,000 600,000 600,000 80,000 180,000 200,000 26-Nov-10 03-Dec-10 09-Feb-11 27-Apr-11 14-Jun-11 13-Aug-11 20-Dec-11 24-Feb-12 24-Feb-12 05-Jun-12 27-Sep-12 09-Oct-12 31-Oct-12 31-Oct-12 03-Dec-12 26-Nov-20 03-Dec-20 09-Feb-21 27-Apr-21 14-Jun-21 13-Aug-21 20-Dec-21 24-Feb-22 24-Feb-22 05-Jun-22 27-Sep-22 06-Oct-22 31-Oct-22 31-Oct-22 03-Dec-22 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.19 1.19 0.99 0.80 0.94 0.82 0.61 0.37 1.26 0.17 0.93 1.01 0.52 0.18 0.61 As at December 31, 2012, approximately 7.4 million (2011 – 7 million) options were available for issuance under the Plan. The estimated fair value of share options is amortized over the period in which the options vest, which is normally three years. For those options that vest on single or multiple dates, either on issuance or on meeting milestones (the “measurement date”), the entire fair value of the vesting options is recognized immediately on the measurement date. Of the 17,139,167 common share options issued 16,964,167 vest evenly over a three-year period and 175,000 vest based on achievement of certain milestones. The fair value of options that vest upon achievement of milestones will be recognized based on our best estimate of outcome of achieving our results. As at December 31, 2012 all outstanding share options have a contractual life of ten years. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt68 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION / NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fair Value of Stock Options Granted The fair value at the grant date was calculated using Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: Grant date share price Exercise price Range of risk-free interest rate Volatility of the expected market price of share Expected life of options Dividend yield Forfeiture rate twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 C$2.10–C$2.58 C$3.00 0.99%–1.43% 43.70%–61.62% 1.25–5.00 0% 0%–30% C$2.14–C$3.00 C$3.00 1.01%–2.22% 53% 3.44 0% 6.39% Due to lack of sufficient historical information for the Company, volatility was determined using the existing historical volatility information of the Company’s share price combined with the industry average for comparable-size mining companies. Movements in Shares Options During the Period The following reconciles the share options outstanding at the beginning and end of the period: number of options Weighted average exercise price Balance at beginning of the period – October 1, 2010 Granted during the period Forfeited during the period Exercised during the period Expired during the period Balance at end of the period – December 31, 2011 Granted during the period Forfeited during the period Exercised during the period Expired during the period Balance at end of the period – December 31, 2012 Number of options exercisable – December 31, 2011 Number of options exercisable – December 31, 2012 – 17,980,000 (362,778) – – 17,617,222 3,580,000 (4,058,055) – – 17,139,167 5,133,604 10,736,662 – C$3.00 C$3.00 – – c$3.00 C$3.00 C$3.00 – – c$3.00 (b) Fixed Bonus Plan The Fixed Bonus Plan authorizes the directors to grant Fixed Bonus Plan Units (“Units”) to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries in lieu of participating in the Stock Option Plan. Each Unit entitles the holder upon exercise to receive a cash payment equal to the closing price of a com- mon share of Teranga on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) on the business day prior to the date of exercise, less the exercise price. Units may be exercised at any time from the date of vesting to the date of their expiry subject to the terms of the plan. Units are not transferable or assignable. The exercise price of each Unit is determined by the Board of Directors at the date of grant but in no event shall be less than the five-day weighted average closing price of the common shares as reported on TSX for the period ended on the busi- ness day immediately preceding the day on which the option was granted. The vesting of the Units is determined by the Board of Direc- tors at the date of grant. The term of Units granted under the Fixed Bonus Plan is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, provided that such term cannot exceed ten years from the date that the Units are granted. The Fixed Bonus Plan was introduced during the third quarter of 2012. As at December 31, 2012 a total of 1,440,000 Units were granted to employees. During 2012, no Units were for- feited or exercised. As at December 31, 2012, there were 1,440,000 Units outstanding that were granted on August 8, 2012 with Grant date share price Exercise price Range of risk-free interest rate Expected life of options Dividend yield Forfeiture rate Volatility of the expected market price of share twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 C$2.10–C$2.58 C$3.00 0.99%–1.43% 43.70%–61.62% 1.25–5.00 0% 0%–30% C$2.14–C$3.00 C$3.00 1.01%–2.22% 53% 3.44 0% 6.39% 69 expiry dates ranging from November 24, 2020 through to February 24, 2022. The Units each have an exercise price of C$3.00 and have fair values at December 31, 2012 in the range of C$0.23 to C$1.03 per Unit. The estimated fair values of the Units are amortized over the period in which the Units vest. Of the 1,440,000 Units issued, 50% vested upon issuance, 25% vested on December 31, 2012 and 25% vest on December 31, 2013. Fair Value of Units Granted The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: Share price at the end of the period Exercise price Range of risk-free interest rate Volatility of the expected market price of share Expected life of options Dividend yield Forfeiture rate twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 $2.26 C$3.00 1.13%–1.38% 43.70%–61.62% 1.25–5.00 0% 6%–30% – – – – – – – Due to lack of sufficient historical information for the Company, volatility was determined using the existing historical volatility information of the Company’s share price combined with the industry average for comparable-size mining companies. 37. seGment RePORtinG The Company has one reportable operating segment under IFRS 8, “Operating Segments” relating to the gold activity. Geographical information The Company operates in two geographical areas, predominantly in Senegal (West Africa) and Mauritius. The following table discloses the Company’s revenue by geographical location: twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 Republic of Senegal – revenue from gold and silver sales 350,520 Republic of Senegal – Other revenue Mauritius Canada total 31 – 5 350,556 The following is an analysis of the Company’s non-current assets by geographical location: 236,873 39 – 809 237,721 Republic of Senegal Mauritius Canada total December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 (note 4) 391,638 – 1,778 393,416 356,731 4,088 1,075 361,894 information about major customers Gold sales revenue from one customer for the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $351 million and $237 million, respectively. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt 70 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION / NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 38. Key manaGement PeRsOnnel cOmPensatiOn The Company considers key members of management to include the Executive Chairman, President and CEO, Non-exec- utive Directors, Vice Presidents and the General Manager and Government Relations Manager of SGO. The remuneration of the key members of management includes 15 members during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 13 members during the fifteen months ended December 31, 2011. The remuneration during the twelve and fifteen months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows: short term benefits salary and Fees non-cash Benefits cash Bonus cash settled share based payments – value vested during the period equity settled share based payments – value vested during the period Options Options total For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 Compensation 3,556 68 1,152 898 2,684 8,358 For fifteen months ended December 31, 2011 Compensation 3,567 21 435 – 8,729 12,752 39. RelateD PaRty tRansactiOns 40. aPPROVal OF tHe cOnsOliDateD (a) equity interests in Related Parties Financial statements Details of percentages of ordinary shares held in subsidiaries are disclosed in Note 33. These consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on February 20, 2013. (b) transactions with Key management Personnel Details of key management personnel compensation are disclosed in Note 38. No loans were made to directors or director-related entities during the period. (c) transactions with Other Related Parties The Company has no payable to or receivable from other related parties as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. 71 asX listinG ReQUiRements • adopting measures for receiving feedback from stakeholders; and corporate Governance statement The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga” or the “Company”) is committed to adhering to the highest possible standards in its corporate governance practices. The Board has approved Corporate Governance Guidelines which, together with the Board Mandate (as set out below), the position descriptions for the Chairman of the Board and for the Chief Executive Officer, and the charters of the committees of the Board, provide the general framework for the governance of Teranga. The Board believes that these guidelines will continue to evolve in order to comply with all applicable regulatory and stock exchange requirements relating to corporate governance and will be modified as circumstances warrant. This report describes the corporate governance principles that the Company adheres to in accomplishing its business objec- tives. Governance information on Teranga is available on the Company’s website at: www.terangagold.com. PRinciPle 1: lay sOliD FOUnDatiOn FOR manaGement anD OVeRsiGHt Board Mandate The Board is elected by the shareholders of Teranga and is responsible for the stewardship of Teranga and has adopted a formal written mandate setting out the Board’s stewardship responsibilities, including: • adopting a strategic planning process; • understanding and monitoring the political, cultural, legal and business environments in which Teranga operates; • risk identification and ensuring that procedures are in place for the management of those risks; • review and approve annual operating plans and budgets; • corporate social responsibility, ethics and integrity; • succession planning, including the appointment, training and supervision of management; • delegations and general approval guidelines for management; • monitoring financial reporting and management; • monitoring internal control and management information systems; • corporate disclosure and communications; • adopting key corporate policies designed to ensure that Teranga, its directors, officers and employees comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and conduct their business ethically and with honesty and integrity. Day-to-day management The Board delegates responsibility for the day to day manage- ment of Teranga’s business and affairs to Teranga’s senior officers and supervises such senior officers appropriately. Committees of the Board The Board has determined that there should be five stand- ing Board committees: (i) Audit Committee; (ii) Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; (iii) Compensation Committee; (iv) Finance Committee; and (v) Technical, Safety, Environment and Social Responsibility Committee. The Board will change the Board committee structure and authorize and appoint other committees as it considers appropriate. The Board may from time time, delegate certain matters it is responsible for to Board committees. The Board however, retains its oversight function and ultimate responsibility for these matters and all delegated responsibilities. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the adequacy of the Board Mandate on an annual basis and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for consideration. The Board has delegated responsibility to this Committee for developing Teranga’s approach to corporate governance, including recommending modifications to these Corporate Governance Guidelines for consideration by the Board. Committee Charters The Board approves written charters for each committee of the Board setting forth the purpose, authority, duties and responsibilities of each committee, as set forth further below. The Charter for each committee is available on the Company’s website at: www.terangagold.com. The Board has determined that all committees will be com- prised entirely of directors determined by the Board to be in- dependent, except for the Technical, Safety, Environment and Social Responsibility Committee which will be comprised of a majority of independent directors. In addition, all members of the Audit Committee will be financially literate and if required by applicable laws, rules and regulations, at least one member will be a financial expert. Membership and independence of all committee members will be publicly disclosed. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt72 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION After receipt of recommendations from the Corporate Gov- ernance and Nominating Committee, the Board appoints members of the committees annually, and as necessary to fill vacancies, and appoints the chairman of each committee. Members of the committees will hold office at the pleasure of the Board. Committee Responsibilities The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) financial reporting and disclosure requirements; (b) en- suring that an effective risk management and financial control framework has been implemented and tested by management of Teranga; and (c) external and internal audit processes. The responsibilities of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee include assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) developing corporate governance guidelines and principles for Teranga; (b) identifying individuals qualified to be nominated as mem- bers of the Board; (c) the structure and composition of Board committees; and (d) evaluating the performance and effective- ness of the Board. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) the establishment of key human resources and compensation policies, including all incentive and equity based compensation plans; (b) the performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, and determination of the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other senior executives of Teranga; (c) succession planning, including the appoint- ment, training and evaluation of senior management; and (d) compensation of directors. The responsibilities of the Finance Committee include assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) Teranga’s financial policies and strategies, including capital structure; (b) Teranga’s financial risk management practices; and (c) proposed issues of securities and utilization of financial instruments. The responsibilities of the Technical, Safety, Environment and Social Responsibility Committee include assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) techni- cal matters relating to exploration, development, permitting, construction and operation of Teranga’s mining activities; (b) resources and reserves on Teranga’s mineral resource proper- ties; (c) material technical commercial arrangements regard- ing EPCM activities; (d) operating and production plans for proposed and existing operating mines; (e) due diligence in the development, implementation and monitoring of systems and programs for management, and compliance with applicable law related to health, safety, environment and social responsi- bility; (f) ensuring Teranga implements best-in-class property development and operating practices; (g) monitoring safety, environment and social responsibility performance; and (h) monitoring compliance with applicable laws related to safety, environment and social responsibility. Management Performance and Compensation The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of the performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the senior executives and, in the Committee’s discretion, presents its conclusions and recommends any compensation changes to the Board for consideration. PRinciPle 2: stRUctURe tHe BOaRD tO aDD ValUe Election by Shareholders The members of the Board are selected each year by the shareholders of Teranga at the annual general meeting of shareholders. The Board proposes individual nominees to the shareholders for election to the Board at each such meeting. Between annual meetings of shareholders, the Board may appoint directors to serve until the next such meeting in accordance with Teranga’s articles and by-laws. Selection of Chairman of the Board The Chairman of the Board is appointed by the Board after considering the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board adopts and performs an annual review of the position description for the Chairman of the Board. Role of Chairman and CEO The roles of each of the Chairman and the CEO of Teranga are held by two different individuals. The Board has taken the view that given the stage of development of the Company and the unique skill set of the Chairman, it is important that the Chairman be an active member of the executive team and therefore, a non-independent member of the Board. Independence; Lead Director The Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors. The independent directors select an independent director to carry out the functions of a lead director. If Teranga has a non-executive Chairman of the Board, then the role of the lead director is filled by the non-executive Chairman of the Board. The lead director or non-executive Chairman of the Board Chairs regular meetings of the independent directors and assumes other responsibilities that the independent directors as a whole have designated. The primary responsibility of the lead director is to seek to ensure that appropriate structures and procedures are in place so that the board of directors may function independently and to lead the process by which the independent directors seek to ensure that the board of directors represents and protects the interests of all shareholders. In addition, the lead independent director reviews, comments and is given the opportunity to set agendas for meetings of the Board (full board or independent directors only), oversee the information made available to directors by management and manages requests from or other issues that independent directors may have. Director Selection Criteria The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is required under its charter to annually review the characteris- tics, qualities, skills and experience which form the criteria for candidates to be considered for nomination to the Board. The objective of this review will be to maintain the composition of the Board in a way that provides, in the judgment of the Board, the best mix of skills and experience to provide for the overall stewardship of Teranga. All directors are required to possess fundamental qualities of intelligence, honesty, integrity, ethi- cal behavior, fairness and responsibility and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the shareholders. They must also have a genuine interest in Teranga, the ability to be objective at all times about what is in the best interests of Teranga, have independent opinions on all issues and be both willing and able to state them in a constructive manner and be able to devote sufficient time to discharge their duties and responsibilities effectively. The Committee is mandated to identify qualified candidates for nomination as directors and to make recommendations to the Board. Directors are encour- aged to identify potential candidates. Board Size The Board has the ability to increase or decrease its size within the limits set out in Teranga’s articles and by-laws. The Board will determine its size with regard to the best interests of Teran- ga. The Board believes that the size of the Board should be sufficient to provide a diversity of expertise and opinions and to allow effective committee organization, yet small enough to enable efficient meetings and decision-making and maximize full Board attendance. The Board will review its size if a change is recommended by the Committee. Term Limits for Directors The Board has determined that fixed term limits for direc- tors should not be established. The Board is of the view that such a policy would have the effect of forcing directors off the Board who have developed, over a period of service, increased insight into Teranga and who, therefore, can be expected to provide an increasing contribution to the Board. At the same time, the Board recognizes the value of some turnover in Board membership to provide fresh ideas and views, and the Corpo- rate Governance and Nominating Committee is mandated to annually consider recommending changes to the composition of the Board. Director Compensation The Board has determined that the directors should be com- pensated in a form and amount that is appropriate and which is customary for comparative companies, having regard to such matters as time commitment, responsibility and trends in director compensation. The Compensation Committee is mandated to review the compensation of the directors on an annual basis. All compensation paid to directors will be pub- licly disclosed. Attendance at Meetings Directors are expected to attend all Board and committee meetings either in person or by conference call. A director will notify the Chairman of the Board or of a committee or the Corporate Secretary if the director will not be able to attend or participate in a meeting. Teranga will publicly disclose the Directors’ attendance record on an annual basis. Assessment of Board and Committee Performance The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is man- dated to undertake an annual assessment of the overall perfor- mance and effectiveness of the Board and each committee of the Board and report on such assessments to the Board. The purpose of the assessments is to ensure the continued effec- tiveness of the Board in discharging its duties and responsibili- ties and to contribute to a process of continuing improvement. PRinciPle 3: PROmOte etHical anD ResPOnsiBle DecisiOn maKinG The Company has implemented a set of core values designed to act as guidelines for the standards of integrity and perfor- mance for the Board, Management, employees, and other members of the Company. The Company’s vision and values are disclosed on the Company’s website. Employees are responsible for their conduct which is expected to comply with Company policies and procedures includ- ing those related to health & safety, social & environmental, equal opportunity, human rights, disclosure and trading in Company securities. Induction programs and on-going training are required for each employee and contractor to ensure they are aware and kept up to date of acceptable behaviour and Company policies. 74 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION Procedures are in place to record and publicly report each Director’s shareholdings in the Company. The Company Secretary is responsible for investigating any reports of unethical practices and reporting the outcomes to the Chairman and the CEO or to the Board, as appropriate. The Company has created a formal Code of Conduct and Ethics which described the Company’s values, and can be found in the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website. All details describing, prescribing and underpinning ethical conduct are contained in the values and key policies outlined therein. In summary, Teranga’s Code of Conduct includes an equal op- portunity requirement mandating that “all employees are to be recruited, and to pursue their careers, free from any form of unwanted discrimination” and that “Teranga shall not discrimi- nate on the basis of age, color, creed, disability, ethnic origin, gender, marital status, national origin, political belief, race, religion or sexual orientation, unless required for occupational reasons as permitted by law.” Diversity Teranga does not have a separate diversity policy, nor does it currently provide statistics on gender diversity within its workforce, or its executive team. The identity of all Board members is disclosed within this Annual Report. With respect to Teranga’s current organization: • of the 8 senior executives of Teranga, 1 is female; • within the Corporate office, excluding executive officers, approximately 75% of staff are female; and • within the general workforce in Senegal, approximately 6% of employees, including expatriate personnel, and contrac- tors are female. Further details of Teranga’s workforce both in its head office and on-site in Senegal can be found on page 13 of the 2013 Responsibility Report available on the Company’s website. Teranga will be considering the adoption of a diversity policy with its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee this year. Teranga has not yet set specific measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity as further research and study is required in this regard given the nature, location and require- ments of our mining operations abroad. Once the Corporate Governance Committee and Nominating Committee has investigated the necessity of a diversity policy, as well as what may be appropriate measurable objectives, it shall update the market in this regard and will provide reporting against such measures in its future Annual Reports. While paramount importance is given to identifying the right candidate for each key role within the Company, Teranga recognizes the impor- tance of gender diversity and as such is focused on recruiting women into all available roles. PRinciPle 4: saFeGUaRD inteGRity in Financial RePORtinG The primary function of the audit committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) is to assist the Board in fulfilling its finan- cial reporting and controls responsibilities to Shareholders Information with respect to the Audit Committee is contained in the Company’s Annual Information Form. Composition of the Audit Committee The Audit Committee of the Company is currently comprised of four independent members. All members of the Audit Com- mittee are financially literate in that they have the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that are of the same breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues as can be reasonably expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements. Relevant Education and Experience For summary details regarding the relevant education and experience of each member of the Audit Committee relevant to the performance of his duties as a member of the Audit Committee, please refer to the Corporate Governance page of the Company’s website: www.terangagold.com. Audit Committee Oversight At no time since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year did the Board decline to adopt a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor. The Audit Committee is chaired by an independent director who is not the chairman of the Board. PRinciPle 5: maKe timely anD BalanceD DisclOsURe Teranga’s Corporate Disclosure Policy is included on its web- site (under the tab “About Teranga – Corporate Governance”) and sets out a policy that is consistent with the recommenda- tions included under Principal 5. PRinciPle 6: ResPect tHe RiGHts OF sHaReHOlDeRs The Company regularly engages with its shareholders and con- ducts regular analyst briefings. These activities are supported by the publication of the Annual Report, Quarterly Reports both financial and operational, public announcements and the 75 posting of all press releases (TSX and ASX) on the Company website immediately after their public disclosure. Shareholders can elect to receive email notification of announcements by requesting addition to the Company’s mailing list. As per the Audit Committee Charter, specifically under Sec- tion 4.2 thereof, the Audit Committee is charged with review- ing and making recommendations to the Board regarding Teranga’s risk management policies and procedures; Shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting and to listen to regular conference calls which are scheduled and disclosed publicly. Replays of conference calls are available for a limited time. Details of suck replays are outlined on the original conference call scheduling announce- ment. The external auditor attends the Annual General Meet- ing and is available to answer questions in relation to the audit of the financial statements. The Board recognizes the importance of managing the risks associated with Teranga’ business operations and has defined a set of processes to effectively manage risk within the busi- ness. They include (but are not limited to) processes to: • identify risks relevant to the business to determine what can happen, when and how; • assess identified risks to determine their potential severity Teranga does not have a distinct communications policy but its Corporate Disclosure Policy (available on the Company website) does address the matters recommended under Principal 6 with respect to promoting effective communication with shareholders and the effective use of electronic communication. PRinciPle 7: RecOGnise anD manaGe RisK The Board will adopt a strategic planning processes to establish objectives and goals for Teranga’s business and will review, approve and modify as appropriate the strategies proposed by senior management to achieve such objectives and goals. The Board will review and approve, at least on an annual basis, a strategic plan which takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of Teranga’s business and affairs. The Board, in conjunction with management, will identify the principal risks of Teranga’s business and oversee manage- ment’s implementation of appropriate systems to effectively monitor, manage and mitigate the impact of such risks. Pursuant to its duty to oversee the implementation of effective risk management policies and procedures, the Board will delegate to the Compensation Committee the responsibility for assessing and implementing risk management policies and procedures directly connected to Teranga’s compensation practices. Similarly, the Board will delegate the responsibility of assessing and implementing risk management policies and procedures directly connected to environmental risk manage- ment to the Technical, Safety, Environmental and Social Responsibility Committee. The Board will work in conjunction with each Committee, respectively, to oversee the implemen- tation of such policies and procedures. Under applicable securities laws, Teranga’s CEO and CFO are required to certify, on a quarterly basis, on the design and effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as well as internal controls over financial reporting, and to indicate any identified weaknesses; and impact on the business; • evaluate risks; • treatment plans for risks deemed unacceptable to the business; • communicate risk management activities and processes to employees; and • monitor and review risks, risk mitigation strategies and actions as well as the risk management processes and system. PRinciPle 8: RemUneRate FaiRly anD ResPOnsiBly Teranga operates in the international gold mining industry, which is a highly competitive market for executives and Teranga has designed its compensation program to ensure it is able to both attract and retain qualified and experienced executives with the skills and experience required to execute its strategy. Composition of the Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee is comprised of three indepen- dent directors and while the Board determines its members, the CEO is not involved in the selection process for this committee. The chair of the Compensation Committee is a non-executive independent director. Role of the Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee is established by the Board to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relat- ing to compensation. The Compensation Committee helps to ensure that Teranga has a compensation program that will attract, retain, motivate and reward its executive officers for their performance and contribution to achieving Teranga’s long term strategy. 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt76 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION The Board of Teranga established a Compensation Committee on incorporation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has been in place for the entire 2012 fiscal year. The Compensation Committee’s primary responsibilities include: Compensation Philosophy, Policies and Practices – ensure compensation philosophy, policies and practices for the directors, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the executive officers: • properly reflect their respective duties and responsibilities; • are competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating people of the highest quality; • align the interests of the directors, the CEO and the executive officers with shareholders as a whole; • are based on established corporate and individual performance objectives; and • do not encourage the taking of inappropriate or excessive risks. Evaluation of Performance – annually review and evaluate the performance of the CEO and the executive officers and, in light of pre-established performance objectives, report its conclusions to the Board; Performance Objectives – annually review the performance objectives for the CEO and the executive officers and, in the Committee’s discretion, recommend any changes to the Board for consideration; Chief Executive Officer Compensation – annually review the compensation for the CEO and, in the Committee’s discretion, recommend any changes to the Board for consideration; Executive Officers Compensation – annually review the CEO’s recommendations for the executive officers’ compensation and, in the Committee’s discretion, recommend any changes to the Board for consideration; Succession Planning – annually review Teranga’s succession plan for the CEO and the executive officers, including appoint- ment, training and evaluation; Directors’ Compensation – annually review directors’ compen- sation and, in the Committee’s discretion, recommend any changes to the Board for consideration; Mitigation of Compensation Risk – annually consider the risks associated with Teranga’s compensation policies and practices, and ensure appropriate risk mitigation measures are adopted. Role of the Chief Executive Officer The CEO’s role in executive compensation matters includes making recommendations to the Compensation Committee re- garding the Company’s annual business plan and objectives, which provide the basis for establishing both corporate and in- dividual performance goals for all executive officers. The CEO reviews the performance of the other executive officers, and also makes recommendations with respect to adjustments in base salary, awarding of annual performance incentives, and awarding of long-term equity incentives to such executive officers. The CEO is not involved in the selection process for the Compensation Committee, or in making recommendations with respect to his own compensation package. The Compensation Committee reviews the basis for the rec- ommendations of the CEO and, prior to making its recommen- dations to the Board, exercises its sole discretion in making any modifications to such recommendations. Compensation Philosophy The objective of Teranga’s compensation program is to attract, retain, motivate and reward its executive officers for their per- formance and contribution to executing Teranga’s long-term strategy to maximize shareholder value. Teranga’s compensa- tion policy revolves around a pay for performance philosophy whereby fixed elements of pay, such as salary, are positioned at market median levels for the comparator group, while short and longer term incentives are structured to provide above- market total compensation for high levels of corporate and personal performance. The Compensation Committee be- lieves it is necessary to adopt this compensation philosophy in order to attract and retain qualified executive officers with the skills and experience necessary to execute Teranga’s strategy. The Board seeks to compensate Teranga’s executive officers by combining short and long-term cash and equity incentives. It also seeks to reward the achievement of corporate and indi- vidual performance objectives, and to align executive officers’ incentives with shareholder value creation. The Board also seeks to set company performance goals that reach across all business areas and to tie individual goals to the area of the executive officer’s primary responsibility. At this point the Compensation Committee does not anticipate making any significant changes to its compensation philoso- phy, policies and practices for the 2013 financial year, but expects to review best practice developments in this regard to ensure that current practices do not create undue risk to Teranga and to continue to ensure the alignment of compen- sation packages with the objective of enhancing shareholder value through an increased share price. 77 Management Performance and Compensation The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of the performance objectives for the Company’s executive man- agement group. Compensation changes may be recommended to the Board, at the Committee’s discretion, based upon an executive officer’s success in meeting or exceeding indi- vidual performance goals, as well as contributing to achieving Company performance goals. The Committee also conducts an independent review of current market standards regarding executive compensation, as well as an assessment of Teranga’s executive compensation relative to peer industry participants. The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to be competitive with those offered by publicly traded mining companies comparable to Teranga in terms of size, assets, production and region of operation. Further detailed information on director and executive man- agement compensation for the 2012 financial year will be disclosed in the Company’s Management Information Circular to be filed with the TSX and ASX prior to June 1, 2013. asX listing Rule 4.10 – additional Disclosure TGZ Top 20 Shareholders as at 31 March 2013 Rank shareholder number of shares % of issued capital 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mineral Deposits Limited National Nominees Limited Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited Canaccord Genuity Corp J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited State Street Trust Royal Bank Of Canada Zero Nominees Pty Ltd CIBC: CIBC Mellon Gss J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited Haywood Securities RBC Investor Services (Toronto) Citibank CDA - Client Ubs Nominees Pty Ltd NBCN Inc. BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd CIBC World Markets Inc BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc TD Waterhouse Canada Inc total top Holders Balance total Remaining Holders Balance total securities on issue Distribution Schedule of CDI holders - as at 28 March 2013 Range 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 – 9,999,999,999 TOTAL 39,999,838 27,301,079 25,843,068 24,040,105 18,308,680 15,690,350 15,068,951 8,159,128 6,562,892 5,695,475 5,611,760 4,159,951 3,004,648 2,184,831 2,127,463 2,105,745 1,946,940 1,916,629 1,407,265 1,301,580 212,436,378 33,181,622 245,618,000 16.29 11.12 10.52 9.79 7.45 6.39 6.14 3.32 2.67 2.32 2.28 1.69 1.22 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.79 0.78 0.57 0.53 86.49 13.51 100.00 total Holders Units % of issue capital 1,133 799 287 330 35 2,584 412,231 1,926,969 2,113,300 9,046,014 159,118,292 172,616,806 0.24% 1.12% 1.22% 5.24% 92.18% 100% 2012 AnnuAl RepoRt78 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION Unmarketable Parcels of securities, escrow and On-the-market Buyback As at March 28, 2013, there were 674 security holders with an unmarketable parcel of securities (less than $500 based on a market price of $1.08 per unit) totaling 92,121 units. There are not currently any class of securities the subject of escrow. There is no current on-the-market buy-back. substantial shareholders As at the date of the Annual Report, there were 7 substantial shareholders of Teranga. The details of those shareholders are as follows: name Mineral Deposits Limited National Nominees Limited Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited Canaccord Genuity Corp J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited State Street Trust total number Of securities 39,999,838 27,301,079 25,843,068 24,040,105 18,308,680 15,690,350 15,068,951 % 16.29 11.12 10.52 9.79 7.45 6.39 6.14 166,252,071 67.69 share classes and Voting Rights (a) the options were issued within 3 years of the date of admis- There is only a single share class being common shares and CDIs of Teranga Gold Corporation. The total amount of outstanding common shares of Teranga Gold Corporation is 245,618,000. As detailed in the Annual Report, Teranga is authorized to is- sue an unlimited number of common shares with no par value. Holders of common shares are entitled to one vote for each common share on all matters to be voted on by shareholders at meetings of Teranga’s shareholders. All dividends which the board of directors may declare shall be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on all common shares at the time outstanding. There are no pre-emptive, redemption or conversion rights attaching to the common shares. All common shares, when issued, are and will be issued as fully paid and non-assessable shares without liability for further calls or to assessment. issuance of Options to Directors On 30 November 2010, Teranga received its conditional listing approval from ASX which was subject to a number of conditions (“Listing Conditions”). Teranga received a waiver from ASX Listing Rule 10.14 to the extent necessary to permit Teranga to issue options to Messrs’ Hill, Young, Lennox-King, Lattanzi, Thomas and Wheatley pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in Teranga’s incentive stock option plan summarized in its IPO prospectus on the condition that: sion to the official list of ASX; and (b) details of any options that are subsequently issues are published in each annual report of Teranga relevant to the period in which they are issued. The following options were issued during the fiscal period which need disclosure pursuant to the Listing Conditions: Date Of issue number Of Options (at $3.00) n/a n/a 24/02/2012 24/02/2012 24/02/2012 24/02/2012 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 name Mr. Alan Hill Mr. Richard Young Mr. Alan Thomas Mr. Chris Lattanzi Mr. Frank Wheatley Mr. Oliver Lennox-King corporate status Teranga Gold Corporation (ACN 146 848 508) (Teranga) is a company incorporated under the laws of Canada, with members’ liability limited. not subject to chapters 6, 6a, 6B and 6c of the corporations act 2001 (cth) Teranga is not subject to chapters 6, 6A, 6B and 6C of the Australian Corporations Act 2001 dealing with the acquisition of shares in Teranga in relation to substantial holdings and takeovers. 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 79 Canadian rules also provide an early warning system to notify the market of significant accumulation of securities. Under the system an acquirer must issue a press release and file a report with provincial securities commission under the initial acquisition (whether from market purchases, treasury or otherwise) of 10% or more of the share capital of a public company and thereafter upon acquisition of an additional 2%. The above is only a short summary of certain takeover bid and related requirements and reference must be made to applicable Canadian corporate and securities legislation, including the requirements of the Toronto Stock Exchange, for further details of takeover bid provisions and other regulated transactions such as insider bids, related party transactions and private placements, among others. share Registries canada: computershare trust company of canada Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2Y1 T: +1 800 564 6253 australia: computershare investor services Pty ltd The Registrar, Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited, GPO Box 2975, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia T: 1 300 850 505 limitations on the acquisition of teranga securities imposed by canada In Canada, acquisitions of securities by takeover bid are regu- lated by provincial securities legislation. Generally, under this legislation, an offer to acquire securities from a shareholder resident in a Canadian province which will result in the offeror (including joint actors) holding 20% or more of the issued share capital of the company constitutes a takeover bid. Subject to limited exceptions, (for example the purchase at not more than a market price of up to 5% of outstanding shares over 12 months, private offers to no more than 5 persons at no greater than 115% of market price and purchases from treasury) an offeror must: (a) provide shareholders with a takeover bid circular describing the terms of the offer and if securities of the offeror form part of the consideration, including prospectus level disclosure about the offeror and its business’; (b) keep the bid open for at least 35 days; and (c) deliver the circular and extend the offer to each shareholder of the company, with the ultimate purchase of shares being pro rata amongst those shareholders who have tendered their shares under the bid. Rules also provide an early warning system to notify the market of significant accumulations of securities. Under federal corporate law, if a takeover bid is accepted by the holders of not less than 90% of the outstanding shares (excluding shares held at the date of the bid by or on behalf of the offeror) the offeror is entitled and the remaining sharehold- ers can require the offeror to acquire the remaining shares either on the same terms of the takeover bid or at fair market value, as elected by the shareholder. 80 TERANGA GOLD CORPORATION cORPORate DiRectORy Directors alan Hill Executive Chairman Richard young President and CEO christopher lattanzi Non-Executive Director Oliver lennox-King Non-Executive Director alan thomas Non-Executive Director Frank Wheatley Non-Executive Director Jeff Williams Non-Executive Director Registered Office Suite 2600-121 King Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3T9 Tel: + 1-416-594-0000 Fax: + 1-416-594-0088 Email: investor@terangagold.com www.terangagold.com senegal Office 2K Plaza Suite B4, 1er Etage Sis Route du Méridien Président Dakar Almadies Tel: + 221-338-693-181 Fax: + 221-338-603-683 auditor senior management Deloitte & Touche LLP alan Hill Executive Chairman Richard young President and CEO mark english Vice President, Sabodala Operations Paul chawrun Vice President, Technical Services navin Dyal Vice President and CFO David savarie Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Kathy sipos Vice President, Investor and Stakeholder Relations macoumba Diop General Manager and Government Relations Manager, SGO share Registries canada: computershare trust company of canada Tel: + 1-800-564-6253 australia: computershare investor services Pty ltd. Tel: + 1-300-850-505 stock exchange listings Toronto Stock Exchange, TSX symbol: TGZ Australian Securities Exchange, ASX symbol: TGZ For further information please contact: Kathy Sipos, Vice President, Investor and Stakeholder Relations: Tel: +1 416 594 0000 Email: ksipos@terangagold.com © Copyright 2013 Teranga Gold Corporation Design and Typesetting: Clear Space, clearspace.ca Printing: Exodus Graphics Corp. teranga Gold corporation Suite 2600-121 King Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3T9 Tel: + 1-416-594-0000 Fax: + 1-416-594-0088 Email: investor@terangagold.com www.terangagold.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above