Quarterlytics / Industrials / Aerospace & Defense / TransDigm Group

TransDigm Group

tdg · NYSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker tdg
Exchange NYSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · TransDigm Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
FLYING
HIGHER

2017

ANNUAL
REPORT

CREATING
SHAREHOLDER
VALUE

FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

TransDigm’s consistent strategy delivered another year of strong value creation for  
our shareholders. The combination of consistently high cash flow and less attractive 
2017 acquisition candidates led us to return approximately $3 billion, or $53 per share, 
to shareholders, through a combination of special dividends and opportunistic  
stock buybacks. 

Despite distractions and challenges in fiscal 2017, our key operating 

Companies list, an honor our company has also received multiple  

performance metrics improved significantly over the prior year. Net 

times in the past. 

sales (excluding discontinued operations) were up 11% and EBITDA As 

Defined increased 14%. The company generated almost $800 million  

UNIQUE BUSINESS MODEL AND VALUE-FOCUSED STRATEGY

of cash from operating activities. We ended the fiscal year with 

Our consistently strong performance reflects the ability of our unique 

substantial and growing liquidity, providing us the financial flexibility  

business model and strategy to create and sustain intrinsic shareholder 

for ongoing growth and future acquisitions. 

value through all phases of the aerospace market cycle. 

Our shareholders continued to do well. As of January 22, 2018,  

We consistently provide reliable, well-engineered products, and deliver 

the date of this letter, our shareholders realized a 42% return over  

them on time. Proprietary products generate more than 90% of our net 

the last 12 months. Due to unusual volatility in our stock, this return 

sales, and about 80% come from products for which we are the sole 

can vary widely depending on the measurement date. Additionally, our 

source provider. More than half of our revenues and a much higher 

long-term returns to our shareholders of 29% over the last five years 

percentage of our EBITDA come from aftermarket sales. Aftermarket 

and 32% over the last 10 years are well in excess of the S&P 500. 

revenues have historically produced a higher gross margin and have 

In recognition of our performance and our unique business model, 

TransDigm was named to the Forbes 2017 World’s Most Innovative 

provided relative stability through the aerospace and defense cycles. 

FLYING HIGHER

SALES
(in millions)

NET
INCOME
(in millions)

EARNINGS
PER SHARE

ADJUSTED
EARNINGS
PER SHARE1

EBITDA
AS DEFINED2
(in millions)

4
0
5
,
3
$

1
7
1
,
3
$
7  
0
7
,
2
$

3
7
3
,
2
$

4
2
9
,
1
$

7
9
5
$

6
8
5
$

7
4
4
$

3
0
3
$

7
0
3
$

9
3
.
0
1
$

4
8
.
7
$

8
8
.
7
$

8
3
.
2
1
$

9
4
.
1
1
$

1
0
.
9
$
6  
7
.
7
$

0
9
.
6
$

1
1
7
,
1
$

5
9
4
,
1
$
4  
3
2
,
1
$

3
7
0
,
1
$
0  
0
9
$

6
1
.
3
$

9
3
.
2
$

 13  14  15  16  17

 13  14  15  16  17

 13  14  15  16  17

 13  14  15  16  17

 13  14  15  16  17

1  Adjusted Net Income is a non-GAAP financial measure presented here as supplemental disclosure to Net Income and reported results. Please see a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income   

  to Net Income immediately following the Form 10-K incorporated in this annual report. Adjusted Earnings Per Share is defined as Adjusted Net Income divided by diluted shares outstanding.

2  EBITDA As Defined is a non-GAAP financial measure presented here as supplemental disclosure to Net Income and reported results. For a presentation of the most directly comparable  

  GAAP measure and a reconciliation of EBITDA As Defined, please see page 23 of the Form 10-K incorporated in this annual report, under Item 6, Selected Financial Data.

1 TRANSDIGM 2017

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our longstanding goal is to give our shareholders private 

conditions, the low cost of capital makes paying down debt our  

equity-like returns with the liquidity of a public market.  

lowest priority. 

To do this we follow a consistent long-term strategy:

Over the past three years, we have experienced different business 

(cid:81)  Own and operate a wide range of proprietary niche aerospace  

conditions and managed capital allocation accordingly. In 2015  

  businesses with significant aftermarket content. 

and 2016, we found a number of attractive acquisition opportunities 

(cid:81)  Follow a simple, well-proven value-based operating methodology  

  based on our three value driver concepts: generate profitable new  

  business, improvements to our cost structure and value-based pricing.

(cid:81)  Maintain a decentralized organization structure that keeps us close  

to the customer and a compensation system that closely aligns our  

  management with shareholders. This enables us to attract and  

retain entrepreneurial managers who think and act like owners.

(cid:81)  Execute a focused and disciplined acquisition process where we  

  see a clear path to value creation.

(cid:81)  Remain appropriately leveraged to optimize shareholder returns. 

Effective long-term capital allocation is also fundamental to creating 

value. We view our capital structure and capital allocation as key parts 

of our effort to create shareholder value. Our priorities for capital 

allocation are, in order, (1) invest in our existing businesses, (2) make 

accretive acquisitions consistent with our strategy and return requirements, 

(3) give back to the shareholders either through special dividends or 

stock buybacks, and (4) pay off debt. Under current capital market 

and acquired approximately $3 billion of proprietary aerospace 

businesses that met our strategic and shareholder return criteria.  

In fiscal 2017, we were in a different environment. We found few 

attractive acquisition candidates, acquiring only three add-on 

aerospace product lines. Given the situation, we elected to allocate 

about $3 billion of our capital to return to shareholders. 

Since the beginning of fiscal 2015, we have returned $3.2 billion  

to our shareholders and acquired $3.2 billion of proprietary aerospace 

businesses. We continued to fully invest in our existing businesses,  

and maintain a healthy cash balance and the financial flexibility  

for attractive acquisitions. As we’ve done consistently in the past,  

in 2018 we will evaluate business and capital market conditions, 

allocate capital and structure our balance sheet in what we determine 

to be the best way to maximize the return to our shareholders. 

WELL-POSITIONED FOR ONGOING GROWTH

Sales to the commercial aerospace market account for almost 70%  

of our revenue, with sales to the defense market making up most  

of the remaining revenue. Over the past five years, the commercial 

FLYING HIGHER

TOTATT L
ENTERPRISE
VAVV LUE1
(in millions)

30%

CAGR

0
0
0
,
6
2
$

0
0
0
,
0
2
$

0
0
0
,
1
1
$

0
0
0
,
3
$

0
0
0
,
2
$

0
0
2
,
1
$

0
5
4
$

0
5
$

9.93   12.98   7.03   3.06   9.09   9.12   9.15   9.17
Original   Recap   Recap  

IPO

1 Total Enterprise Value is equity value plus total net debt.

2 TRANSDIGM 2017

FIVE-YEAR TOTAL RETURN

TransDigm Group Inc.
S&P 500

This graph compares the cumulative total return of a hypothetical investment in  
the shares of common stock of TransDigm Group with the cumulative total return  
of the same hypothetical investment in the S&P 500 Index. The values are based  
on the respective market prices of each on the dates shown. This assumes an initial  
investment of $100 on September 30, 2012, including reinvestment of dividends.

9.12 

9.13 

9.14 

9.15 

9.16 

9.17

$400

$350

$300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OEM market has been strong. The high percentage of new aircraft  

VALUE CREATION THROUGH ALL CYCLES

has likely had some tempering impact on aftermarket growth. Planes  

TransDigm’s unique business model and consistent strategy have 

that are less than five years old are often covered by warranty and 

steadily created shareholder value through up and down aerospace 

even if not, there is typically a lower level of aftermarket demand 

industry market cycles. Our methodology has worked well over many 

during the initial years. 

years and our entire company is focused on the elements of execution. 

We have an attractive mix of products and platform positions that  

In summary, 2017 was a good and busy year. I’m confident that with 

bode well for the future. We have invested significantly in new platform 

our consistent value-focused strategy and strong mix of businesses  

positions over the past 10 years and substantially expanded our 

we can continue to create long-term intrinsic value for our investors. 

content on most major new aircraft designs. 

We thank our shareholders for their investment, our customers  

Due to our investment in new platform positions, we are also well positioned 

for choosing TransDigm, and our managers and employees for their 

on stable and growing platforms on the defense side of our business. 

hard work and dedication. We look forward to reporting to you on  

The combination of dynamic new product activity, strong platform 

positions, potentially solid growth in our markets, and our well proven 

Sincerely,

ability to find and successfully integrate acquisitions positions us  

our progress during 2018. 

well for the future. 

BOARD CHANGES

In October 2017, TransDigm’s Board of Directors appointed Gary E. 

McCullough and David A. Barr to the board. Both bring significant 

public company experience and also the background to support the 

company’s private equity approach. We are fortunate to attract 

executives of this caliber to our board and look forward to their insight. 

W. Nicholas Howley    

Chief Executive Officer and  

Chairman of the Board of Directors  

January 22, 2018 

WORLDWIDE REVENUE 
PASSENGER MILES
(in millions)

5.9%

CAGR

Source: June 2017 Airline Monitor

FORECAST

3 TRANSDIGM 2017

PRODUCT INNOVAVV TAA ION AND NEW BUSINESS

At TransDigm, driving profitable new business development is one of the three elements of our value-based  

operating strategy, along with driving productivity and value-based pricing. Our business units continue to develop  

innovative new product solutions for the company’s broad base of customers. Here are some recent examples:

AEROCONTROLEX has developed the Potable Water Ozone 
Disinfection Cart to address industry concerns over the 
cleanliness of aircraft potable water systems. 

AMSAFE PASSENGER RESTRAINTS has secured  
significant new business with American Airlines  
across multiple products and multiple fleets. 

This ground service device not only provides an effective, safe and 
environmentally friendly method to disinfect aircraft water systems,  
it also reduces cleaning time by 75% and saves an average size  
airline $1.5M annually in labor, water and EPA costs. The system  
has been approved by the FAA, FDA and EPA, and both Boeing  
and Airbus have approved it in their Aircraft Maintenance Manuals.  

AIRBORNE SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA has developed  
the RA-1 special operations Ram Air parachute system. 

This advanced system offers troops a 4-to-1 glide ratio, which affords 
remote, high altitude drops in excess of 40km from the intened landing 
target. The ASNA RA-1 system is currently used by the Army and the 
Air Force. ASNA delivered more than 6,000 RA-1 parachutes, which 
will remain in service for ten years. Multiple foreign governments have 
adopted this system to ensure interoperability with U.S. Forces, which  
will provide a long-term revenue stream. 

American is taking delivery of 100 737-800MAX and 100 A321NEO 
aircraft, as well as retrofitting 202 A321 aircraft and 228 737-800NG 
aircraft. AmSafe will provide all these aircraft with a large number  
of highly engineered lightweight seat belts and state of the art  
airbag systems. In total, these programs will generate good new 
business for AmSafe while providing American commonality  
across their fleets. 

WHIPPANY ACTUATION SYSTEMS was awarded the Boeing 
777X Trailing Edge Electric Motor (TEEM) Unit contract. 

This new Whippany actuator design is a critical component of the 
777X high-lift system, which is utilized to optimize the fuel efficiency  
of the aircraft during flight. Whippany was selected because of the 
strong performance on its legacy 777 actuators as well as its 
innovative approach to improving the serviceability of the TEEM 
actuator in light of the higher duty-cycles of the 777X application.

FLYLL ING HIGHER

4 TRANSDIGM 2017

TRANSDIGM BUSINESS GROUPS

ADAMS RITE AEROSPACE
Ronald Kato, President
Cockpit security systems, aircraft 
hardware, cabin lighting, water faucets 
and systems, and throttle quadrants
Fullerton, California

ADELWIGGINS GROUP
Jeff Zielinski, President
Flexible fluid line connectors, special 
connectors and quick disconnects, 
heaters, hoses, refueling systems 
and clamps
Los Angeles, California

AERO FLUID PRODUCTS
Paula Wheeler, President
Fuel, hydraulic and pneumatic valves
and fluid regulator systems
Painesville, Ohio

AEROCONTROLEX GROUP
Todd Loschelder, President
Fuel, hydraulic and lubrication pumps, 
mechanical controls and gear box
actuators
South Euclid, Ohio

AEROSONIC
Joseph K. Grote, President 
Air data sensing and test and display 
components
Clearwater, Florida

AIRBORNE SYSTEMS
EUROPE 
Chris Rowe, President
Naval decoys, emergency escape
systems and other related products
Llangeinor and Bridgend, Wales UK

AIRBORNE SYSTEMS
NORTH AMERICA
Bryce Wiedeman, President
Military parachutes, cargo aerial
delivery systems and other related
products
Pennauken, New Jersey

AMSAFE PASSENGER
RESTRAINTS
Herb Mardany, President
Passenger seatbelts and unique
seatbelt airbag applications
Phoenix, Arizona

AMSAFE RESTRAINTS & 
SPECIALTY DEVICES
Jason Abbott, President
Airframe barrier nets, lightweight
cargo nets, fire containment covers 
and Tarian ballistic shields
Bridport, Dorset UK

TM

ARKWIN INDUSTRIES
David French, President
Precision hydraulic and fuel system 
components 
Westbury, New York

AVIONIC INSTRUMENTS
Vincent Ciolli, President
Power conversion equipment including 
static inverters, frequency converters
and transformer rectifiers
Avenel, New Jersey

AVTECHTYEE
Robert S. Henderson,
President
Flight deck audio, metallic and carbon
fiber composite engineered structural
rods, and power control products
Everett, Washington

BREEZE EASTERN
Rodger Hahneman, President
Rescue hoists, winches, cargo hooks
and weapons-handling systems
Whippany, New Jersey

CDA INTERCORP
Joseph K. Grote, President 
Specialized controllable drive actuators,
motors, transducers and gearing
for technologically advanced control
systems
Deerfield Beach, Florida

CHAMPION AEROSPACE
Jason Marlin, President
Igniters, exciters and leads for turbine
engines, spark plugs, oil filters and 
ignition harnesses for reciprocating
engines
Liberty, South Carolina

DATA DEVICE CORP
Vincent Buffa, President
Data bus, motion control and
solid-state power controller products
Bohemia, New York 

DUKES AEROSPACE
Scott Cummings, President
Fuel pumps, solenoids, pneumatic 
valves and cabin pressure control 
systems
Northridge, California

ELECTROMECH 
TECHNOLOGIES
Patrick O’Brien, President 
Electromechanical equipment including
actuators, motors, blowers, valves,
liquid level sensors and electronics
Wichita, Kansas

SKURKA AEROSPACE
Michael Barnaba, President
AC/DC motors, fans, blowers, speed
transducers and tachometers
Camarillo, California

TACTAIR / 
YOUNG & FRANKLIN
Michael Yates, President
Hydraulic and pneumatic valves 
and actuators
Liverpool, New York  

TECHNICAL AIRBORNE
COMPONENTS
Dirk Dhooge, President
Custom-engineered control, structural 
and system rods
Milmort, Belgium

TELAIR INTERNATIONAL
Marko Enderlein, President
Containerized cargo handling systems 
and unit load devices
Miesbach, Germany

TELAIR US CARGO SYSTEMS
Michael Yates, President
Onboard cargo handling systems
Goldsboro, North Carolina

WHIPPANY ACTUATION 
SYSTEMS
Rodrigo Rubiano, President
Electromechanical motion control 
subsystems including control 
electronics, motors, high power
mechanical transmissions 
and actuators
Whippany, New Jersey

ELEKTRO-METALL EXPORT
Uwe Basler, President
Electromechanical actuators and
electrical and electromechanical 
components and assemblies 
Ingolstadt, Germany

HARCO
Patrick Murphy, President
Engine thermocouples, sensors, cable
assemblies and air data systems
Branford, Connecticut

HARTWELL
Joel Reiss, President
Access latches, latching systems, 
complex door assemblies and other 
assemblies for aircraft
Placentia, California

MARATHONNORCO 
AEROSPACE
Jason Roth, President
Nickel-cadmium batteries, battery 
chargers, hold-open rods, support struts
and coupling devices
Waco, Texas

NORDISK AVIATION
Richard Betts, President
Air transport cargo containers
Holmestrand, Norway

PEXCO AEROSPACE
Joseph Glover, President
Extruded plastic interior parts
Yakima, Washington

PNEUDRAULICS
Dain Miller, President
Pneumatic and hydraulic components
Rancho Cucamonga, California

SCHNELLER
Alex Feil, President
Decorative laminates and non-textile 
flooring for all commercial aircraft
platforms
Kent, Ohio

SHIELD RESTRAINTS
SYSTEMS
Brian Babin, President
Specialty vehicle restraint products
Elkhart, Indiana

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

to

Commission File Number 001-32833

TransDigm Group Incorporated

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

41-2101738
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3000, Cleveland, Ohio
(Address of principal executive offices)

44114
(Zip Code)

(216) 706-2960
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock
(Title)

New York Stock Exchange
(Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes È No ‘
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data

File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be

contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

È
LARGE ACCELERATED FILER
‘
NON-ACCELERATED FILER
EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY ‘
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying

‘
ACCELERATED FILER
SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY ‘

with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No È
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, 2017, based

upon the last sale price of such voting and non-voting common stock on that date, was $10,561,787,638.

The number of shares outstanding of TransDigm Group Incorporated’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, was 51,959,702 as of

November 6, 2017.

Documents incorporated by reference: The registrant incorporates by reference in Part III hereof portions of its definitive Proxy Statement

for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1

BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 2

ITEM 3

PART II

ITEM 5

ITEM 6

ITEM 7

PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK . .

ITEM 8

ITEM 9

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . .

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 12

ITEM 13

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART IV

ITEM 15

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

1

8

18

18

19

20

23

30

49

49

49

50

52

52

54

54

54

54

55

81

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 1, 1A, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 7A
hereof and elsewhere within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words “believe,”
“may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” and
other words and terms of similar meaning are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although the
Company (as defined below) believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made
in this Report. The more important of such risks and uncertainties are set forth under the caption “Risk Factors”
and elsewhere in this Report. Many such factors are outside the control of the Company. Consequently, such
forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as our current plans, estimates and beliefs. We do not
undertake, and specifically decline, any obligation, to publicly release the results of any revisions to these
forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances after the date of such
statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. All forward-looking statements
attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these
cautionary statements.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements
made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include but are not limited to: the sensitivity of our business to the
number of flight hours that our customers’ planes spend aloft and our customers’ profitability, both of which are
affected by general economic conditions; future geopolitical or other worldwide events; cyber-security threats
and natural disasters; our reliance on certain customers; the U.S. defense budget and risks associated with being a
government supplier; failure to maintain government or industry approvals; failure to complete or successfully
integrate acquisitions; our indebtedness; potential environmental liabilities; increases in raw material costs, taxes
and labor costs that cannot be recovered in product pricing; risks and costs associated with our international sales
and operations; and other factors.

In this report, the term “TD Group” refers to TransDigm Group Incorporated, which holds all of the

outstanding capital stock of TransDigm Inc. The terms “Company,” “TransDigm,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar
terms refer to TD Group, together with TransDigm Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. References to
“fiscal year” mean the year ending or ended September 30. For example, “fiscal year 2017” or “fiscal 2017”
means the period from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Company

TransDigm Inc. was formed in 1993 in connection with a leveraged buyout transaction. TD Group was

formed in 2003 to facilitate a leveraged buyout of TransDigm Inc. The Company was owned by private equity
funds until its initial public offering in 2006. TD Group’s common stock is publicly traded on the New York
Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the ticker symbol “TDG.”

We believe we are a leading global designer, producer and supplier of highly engineered aircraft

components for use on nearly all commercial and military aircraft in service today. Our business is well
diversified due to the broad range of products we offer to our customers. We estimate that about 90% of our net
sales for fiscal year 2017 were generated by proprietary products. In addition, for fiscal year 2017, we estimate
that we generated about 80% of our net sales from products for which we are the sole source provider.

Most of our products generate significant aftermarket revenue. Once our parts are designed into and sold on

a new aircraft, we generate net sales from aftermarket consumption over the life of that aircraft, which is

1

generally estimated to be approximately 25 to 30 years. A typical platform can be produced for 20 to 30 years,
giving us an estimated product life cycle in excess of 50 years. We estimate that approximately 55% of our net
sales in fiscal year 2017 were generated from aftermarket sales, the vast majority of which come from the
commercial and military aftermarkets. These aftermarket revenues have historically produced a higher gross
margin and been more stable than sales to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs.

Products

We primarily design, produce and supply highly engineered proprietary aerospace components (and certain

systems/subsystems) with significant aftermarket content. We seek to develop highly customized products to
solve specific needs for aircraft operators and manufacturers. We attempt to differentiate ourselves based on
engineering, service and manufacturing capabilities. We typically choose not to compete for non-proprietary
“build to print” business because it frequently offers lower margins than proprietary products. We believe that
our products have strong brand names within the industry and that we have a reputation for high quality,
reliability and customer support.

Our business is well diversified due to the broad range of products that we offer to our customers. Some of

our more significant product offerings, substantially all of which are ultimately provided to end-users in the
aerospace industry, include mechanical/electro-mechanical actuators and controls, ignition systems and engine
technology, specialized pumps and valves, power conditioning devices, specialized AC/DC electric motors and
generators, NiCad batteries and chargers, engineered latching and locking devices, rods and locking devices,
engineered connectors and elastomers, databus and power controls, cockpit security components and systems,
specialized cockpit displays, aircraft audio systems, specialized lavatory components, seat belts and safety
restraints, engineered interior surfaces and related components, lighting and control technology, military
personnel parachutes, high performance hoists, winches and lifting devices and cargo loading, handling and
delivery systems.

Segments

The Company’s businesses are organized and managed in three reporting segments: Power & Control,

Airframe and Non-aviation.

The Power & Control segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market systems and

components that predominately provide power to or control power of the aircraft utilizing electronic, fluid, power
and mechanical motion control technologies. Major product offerings include mechanical/electro-mechanical
actuators and controls, ignition systems and engine technology, specialized pumps and valves, power
conditioning devices, specialized AC/DC electric motors and generators, databus and power controls, high
performance hoists, winches and lifting devices and cargo loading and handling systems. Primary customers of
this segment are engine and power system and subsystem suppliers, airlines, third party maintenance suppliers,
military buying agencies and repair depots. Products are sold in the OEM and aftermarket market channels.

The Airframe segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market systems and

components that are used in non-power airframe applications utilizing airframe and cabin structure technologies.
Major product offerings include engineered latching and locking devices, rods and locking devices, engineered
connectors and elastomers, cockpit security components and systems, aircraft audio systems, specialized lavatory
components, seat belts and safety restraints, engineered interior surfaces and related components, lighting and
control technology, military personnel parachutes and cargo delivery systems. Primary customers of this segment
are airframe manufacturers and cabin system suppliers and subsystem suppliers, airlines, third party maintenance
suppliers, military buying agencies and repair depots. Products are sold in the OEM and aftermarket market
channels.

The Non-aviation segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market products for

non-aviation markets. Major product offerings include seat belts and safety restraints for ground transportation

2

applications, mechanical/electro-mechanical actuators and controls for space applications, and refueling systems
for heavy equipment used in mining, construction and other industries. Primary customers of this segment are
off-road vehicle suppliers and subsystem suppliers, child restraint system suppliers, satellite and space system
suppliers and manufacturers of heavy equipment used in mining, construction and other industries.

For financial information about our segments, see Note 16, “Segments,” to our consolidated financial

statements included herein.

Sales and Marketing

Consistent with our overall strategy, our sales and marketing organization is structured to continually

develop technical solutions that meet customer needs. In particular, we attempt to focus on products and
programs that will lead to high-margin, repeatable sales in the aftermarket.

We have structured our sales efforts along our major product offerings, assigning a business unit manager to

certain products. Each business unit manager is expected to grow the sales and profitability of the products for
which he or she is responsible and to achieve the targeted annual level of bookings, sales, new business and
profitability for such products. The business unit managers are assisted by account managers and sales engineers
who are responsible for covering major OEM and aftermarket accounts. Account managers and sales engineers
are expected to be familiar with the personnel, organization and needs of specific customers to achieve total
bookings and new business goals at each account and, together with the business unit managers, to determine
when additional resources are required at customer locations. Most of our sales personnel are evaluated, in part,
on their bookings and their ability to identify and obtain new business opportunities.

Though typically performed by employees, the account manager function may be performed by independent

representatives depending on the specific customer, product and geographic location. We also use a number of
distributors to provide logistical support as well as serve as a primary customer contact with certain smaller
accounts. Our major distributors are Aviall, Inc. (a subsidiary of The Boeing Company) and Satair A/S (a
subsidiary of Airbus S.A.S.).

Manufacturing and Engineering

We maintain approximately 60 principal manufacturing facilities. Most of our manufacturing facilities are

comprised of manufacturing, distribution and engineering functions, and most facilities have certain
administrative functions, including management, sales and finance. We continually strive to improve
productivity and reduce costs, including rationalization of operations, developing improved control systems that
allow for accurate accounting and reporting, investing in equipment, tooling, information systems and
implementing broad-based employee training programs. Management believes that our manufacturing systems
and equipment contribute to our ability to compete by permitting us to meet the rigorous tolerances and cost
sensitive price structure of aircraft component customers.

We attempt to differentiate ourselves from our competitors by producing uniquely engineered products with

high quality and timely delivery. Our engineering costs are recorded in cost of sales and in selling and
administrative expenses and research and development costs are recorded in selling and administrative expenses
in our consolidated statements of income. The aggregate of engineering expense and research and development
expense represents approximately 8% of our operating units’ aggregate costs, or approximately 4% of our
consolidated net sales. Our proprietary products, and particularly our new product initiatives, are designed by our
engineers and are intended to serve the needs of the aircraft component industry. These proprietary designs must
withstand the extraordinary conditions and stresses that will be endured by products during use and meet the
rigorous demands of our customers’ tolerance and quality requirements.

We use sophisticated equipment and procedures to comply with quality requirements, specifications and
Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) and OEM requirements. We perform a variety of testing procedures as

3

required by our customers, such as testing under different temperature, humidity and altitude levels, shock and
vibration testing and X-ray fluorescent measurement. These procedures, together with other customer approved
techniques for document, process and quality control, are used throughout our manufacturing facilities. Refer to
Note 3, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the consolidated financial statements included herein
with respect to total costs of research and development, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Customers

We predominantly serve customers in the commercial, regional, business jet and general aviation
aftermarket, which accounts for approximately 35% of total sales; the commercial aerospace OEM market,
comprising large commercial transport manufacturers and regional and business jet manufacturers, which
accounts for approximately 26% of total sales; and the defense market, which accounts for approximately 34% of
total sales. Non-aerospace sales comprise approximately 5% of our total sales.

Our customers include: (1) distributors of aerospace components; (2) worldwide commercial airlines,
including national and regional airlines; (3) large commercial transport and regional and business aircraft OEMs;
(4) various armed forces of the United States and friendly foreign governments; (5) defense OEMs; (6) system
suppliers; and (7) various other industrial customers. For the year ended September 30, 2017, Airbus S.A.S.
(which includes Satair A/S, a distributor of commercial aftermarket parts to airlines throughout the world)
accounted for approximately 13% of our net sales and The Boeing Company (which includes Aviall, Inc., also a
distributor of commercial aftermarket parts to airlines throughout the world) accounted for approximately 11% of
our net sales. Our top ten customers for fiscal year 2017 accounted for approximately 46% of our net sales.
Products supplied to many of our customers are used on multiple platforms.

Active commercial production programs include the Boeing 737 (including the 737MAX), 747, 767 and

787, the Airbus A320 family (including neo), A330, A350 and A380, the Bombardier CSeries, CRJ’s,
Q400/Dash-8 aircraft, Challenger and Learjets, the Embraer Regional and business jets, the Cessna Citation
family, the Gulfstream aircraft family, the Dassault aircraft family, the HondaJet and the ATR42/72 turboprop.
Military platforms include aircraft such as the Boeing AH-64 Apache, CH-47, C17 Chinook, F-15, F-18, KC46
Tanker, P-8 and V-22, the Airbus A400M, the Lockheed Martin C-130J, F-16 and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter,
UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter, the Northrop Grumman E-2C Hawkeye, the General Atomics Predator Drone and
the Raytheon Patriot Missile. We have been awarded numerous contracts for the development of engineered
products for production on the Airbus A330neo, the Boeing 777x, the Bombardier Global 7000/8000, the
Embraer E2, the Mitsubishi Regional Jet and the Sikorsky S-97 and JMR helicopter.

The markets in which we sell our products are, to varying degrees, cyclical and have experienced upswings
and downturns. The demand for our commercial aftermarket parts and services depends on, among other things,
the breadth of our installed OEM base, revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”), the size and age of the worldwide
aircraft fleet, the percentage of the worldwide fleet that is in warranty, and airline profitability. The demand for
defense products is specifically dependent on government budget trends, military campaigns and political
pressures.

Competition

The niche markets within the aerospace industry that we serve are relatively fragmented and we face several

competitors for many of the products and services we provide. Due to the global nature of the commercial
aircraft industry, competition in these categories comes from both U.S. and foreign companies. Competitors in
our product offerings range in size from divisions of large public corporations to small privately-held entities
with only one or two components in their entire product portfolios.

We compete on the basis of engineering, manufacturing and marketing high quality products, which we

believe meet or exceed the performance and maintenance requirements of our customers, consistent and timely

4

delivery, and superior customer service and support. The industry’s stringent regulatory, certification and
technical requirements and the investments necessary in the development and certification of products may create
disincentives for potential new competitors for certain products. If customers receive products that meet or
exceed expectations and performance standards, we believe that they will have a reduced incentive to certify
another supplier because of the cost and time of the technical design and testing certification process. In addition,
we believe that the availability, dependability and safety of our products are reasons for our customers to
continue long-term supplier relationships.

Government Contracts

Companies engaged in supplying defense-related equipment and services to U.S. Government agencies are
subject to business risks specific to the defense industry. These risks include the ability of the U.S. Government
to unilaterally: (1) suspend us from receiving new contracts and impose criminal penalties based on alleged
violations of procurement laws or regulations; (2) terminate existing contracts; (3) reduce the value of existing
contracts; (4) audit our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs; (5) control and
potentially prohibit the export of our products; and (6) seek repayment of contract related payments under certain
circumstances.

Governmental Regulation

The commercial aircraft component industry is highly regulated by the FAA in the United States and by the

Joint Aviation Authorities in Europe and other agencies throughout the world, while the military aircraft
component industry is governed by military quality specifications. We, and the components we manufacture, are
required to be certified by one or more of these entities or agencies, and, in many cases, by individual OEMs, in
order to engineer and service parts and components used in specific aircraft models.

We must also satisfy the requirements of our customers, including OEMs and airlines that are subject to

FAA regulations, and provide these customers with products and services that comply with the government
regulations applicable to commercial flight operations. In addition, the FAA requires that various maintenance
routines be performed on aircraft components. We believe that we currently satisfy or exceed these maintenance
standards in our repair and overhaul services. We also maintain several FAA approved repair stations.

In addition, our businesses are subject to many other laws and requirements typically applicable to

manufacturers and exporters. Without limiting the foregoing, sales of many of our products that will be used on
aircraft owned by foreign entities are subject to compliance with export control laws and the manufacture of our
products and the operations of our businesses, including the disposal of hazardous wastes, are subject to
compliance with applicable environmental laws.

Market Channels

The commercial aerospace industry, including the aftermarket and OEM market, is impacted by the health

of the global economy and geo-political events around the world. The commercial aerospace industry had shown
strength with increases in revenue passenger miles, or RPMs, between 2003 and 2008, as well as increases in
OEM production and backlog. However, in 2009, the global economic downturn negatively impacted the
commercial aerospace industry causing RPMs to decline slightly. This market sector began to rebound in 2010
and positive growth has continued through 2017 with increases in RPMs, as well as the growth in the large
commercial OEM sector (aircraft with 100 or more seats) with order announcements by The Boeing Company
and Airbus S.A.S. leading to planned increases in production. The 2018 leading indicators and industry
consensus suggest a continuation of current trends in the commercial transport market sector supported by
continued RPM growth and increases in production at the OEM level.

The defense aerospace market is dependent on government budget constraints, the timing of orders, political

pressures and the extent of global conflicts. It is not necessarily affected by general economic conditions that
affect the commercial aerospace industry.

5

Our presence in both the commercial aerospace and military sectors of the aerospace industry may mitigate

the impact on our business of any specific industry risk. We service a diversified customer base in the
commercial and military aerospace industry, and we provide components to a diverse installed base of aircraft,
which mitigates our exposure to any individual airframe platform. At times, declines in sales in one channel have
been offset by increased sales in another. However, due to differences between the profitability of our products
sold to OEM and aftermarket customers, variation in product mix can cause variation in gross margin.

There are many short-term factors (including inventory corrections, unannounced changes in order patterns,
strikes and mergers and acquisitions) that can cause short-term disruptions in our quarterly shipment patterns as
compared to previous quarters and the same periods in prior years. As such, it can be difficult to determine
longer-term trends in our business based on quarterly comparisons. To normalize for short-term fluctuations, we
tend to look at our performance over several quarters or years of activity rather than discrete short-term periods.

There are also fluctuations in OEM and aftermarket ordering and delivery requests from quarter-to-quarter,

as well as variations in product mix from quarter-to-quarter, that may cause positive or negative variations in
gross profit margins since commercial aftermarket sales have historically produced a higher gross margin than
sales to commercial OEMs. Again, in many instances these are timing events between quarters and must be
balanced with macro aerospace industry indicators.

Commercial Aftermarket

The key growth factors in the commercial aftermarket include worldwide RPMs and the size and activity

level of the worldwide fleet of aircraft and the percentage of the fleet that is in warranty.

Commercial OEM Market

The commercial transport market sector, the largest sector in the commercial OEM market, grew modestly

during 2017. Our commercial transport OEM shipments and revenues generally run ahead of the Boeing and
Airbus airframe delivery schedules. As a result and consistent with prior years, our fiscal 2018 shipments will be
a function of, among other things, the estimated 2018 and 2019 commercial airframe production rates. We have
been experiencing increased sales in the large commercial OEM sector (aircraft with 100 or more seats) driven
by an increase in production by The Boeing Company and Airbus S.A.S tied to previous order announcements.
Industry consensus indicates this production increase will continue in 2018 and 2019, though the growth may
continue to moderate and begin to flatten.

Defense

Our military business fluctuates from year to year, and is dependent, to a degree, on government budget
constraints, the timing of orders and the extent of global conflicts. For a variety of reasons, the military spending
outlook is very uncertain. For planning purposes we assume that military related sales of our types of products to
be flat in future years over the recent high levels.

Raw Materials

We require the use of various raw materials in our manufacturing processes. We also purchase a variety of

manufactured component parts from various suppliers. At times, we concentrate our orders among a few
suppliers in order to strengthen our supplier relationships. Most of our raw materials and component parts are
generally available from multiple suppliers at competitive prices.

Intellectual Property

We have various trade secrets, proprietary information, trademarks, trade names, patents, copyrights and
other intellectual property rights, which we believe, in the aggregate but not individually, are important to our
business.

6

Backlog

As of September 30, 2017, the Company estimated its sales order backlog at $1,669 million compared to an
estimated sales order backlog of $1,554 million as of September 30, 2016. The increase in estimated sales order
backlog is primarily due to acquisitions. The majority of the purchase orders outstanding as of September 30,
2017 are scheduled for delivery within the next twelve months. Purchase orders may be subject to cancellation or
deferral by the customer prior to shipment. The level of unfilled purchase orders at any given date during the year
will be materially affected by the timing of the Company’s receipt of purchase orders and the speed with which
those orders are filled. Accordingly, the Company’s backlog as of September 30, 2017 may not necessarily
represent the actual amount of shipments or sales for any future period.

Foreign Operations

Although we manufacture a significant portion of our products in the United States, we manufacture some

products in Belgium, China, Germany, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Sri Lanka, Sweden, and the United
Kingdom. Although the majority of sales of our products are made to customers (including distributors) located
in the United States, our products are ultimately sold to and used by customers (including airlines and other end
users of aircraft) throughout the world. A number of risks inherent in international operations could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, including currency fluctuations, difficulties in staffing and
managing multi-national operations, general economic and political uncertainties and potential for social unrest
in countries in which we operate, limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies, restrictions on
the repatriation of funds, change in trade policies, tariff regulation, difficulties in obtaining export and import
licenses and the risk of government financed competition.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and facilities are subject to a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws
and regulations that govern, among other things, discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the generation,
handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the remediation of contamination and the
health and safety of our employees. Environmental laws and regulations may require that the Company
investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. Certain facilities and third-party sites utilized by the Company have been identified as
potentially responsible parties under the federal superfund laws and comparable state laws. The Company is
currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under applicable laws.

Employees

As of September 30, 2017, we had approximately 9,200 full-time, part-time and temporary employees.
Approximately 11% of our full-time and part-time employees were represented by labor unions. Collective
bargaining agreements between us and these labor unions expire at various dates ranging from February 2018 to
November 2020. We consider our relationship with our employees generally to be satisfactory.

Available Information

TD Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on

Form 8-K, including any amendments, will be made available free of charge on the Company’s website,
www.transdigm.com, as soon as reasonably practicable, following the filing of the reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

7

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Set forth below are important risks and uncertainties that could negatively affect our business and financial

condition and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking
statements contained in this report.

Our commercial business is sensitive to the number of flight hours that our customers’ planes spend aloft,
the size and age of the worldwide aircraft fleet and our customers’ profitability. These items are, in turn,
affected by general economic and geopolitical and other worldwide conditions.

Our commercial business is directly affected by, among other factors, changes in revenue passenger miles
(RPMs), the size and age of the worldwide aircraft fleet, the percentage of the fleet that is out-of-warranty and
changes in the profitability of the commercial airline industry. RPMs and airline profitability have historically
been correlated with the general economic environment, although national and international events also play a
key role. For example, in the past, the airline industry has been severely affected by the downturn in the global
economy, higher fuel prices, the increased security concerns among airline customers following the events of
September 11, 2001, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic, and the conflicts abroad, and
could be impacted by future geopolitical or other worldwide events, such as war, terrorist acts, or a worldwide
infectious disease outbreak. In addition, global market and economic conditions have been challenging with
turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economies and have prolonged declines in business and
consumer spending. As a result of the substantial reduction in airline traffic resulting from these events, the
airline industry incurred large losses and financial difficulties. Some carriers have also parked or retired a portion
of their fleets and have reduced workforces and flights. During periods of reduced airline profitability, some
airlines may delay purchases of spare parts, preferring instead to deplete existing inventories, and delay
refurbishments and discretionary spending. If demand for spare parts decreases, there would be a decrease in
demand for certain of our products. An adverse change in demand could impact our results of operations,
collection of accounts receivable and our expected cash flow generation from current and acquired businesses
which may adversely impact our financial condition and access to capital markets.

Our sales to manufacturers of aircraft are cyclical, and a downturn in sales to these manufacturers may
adversely affect us.

Our sales to manufacturers of large commercial aircraft, such as The Boeing Company, Airbus S.A.S, and
related OEM suppliers, as well as manufacturers of business jets (which collectively accounted for approximately
25% of our net sales in fiscal year 2017) have historically experienced periodic downturns. In the past, these
sales have been affected by airline profitability, which is impacted by, among other things, fuel and labor costs,
price competition, interest rates, downturns in the global economy and national and international events. In
addition, sales of our products to manufacturers of business jets are impacted by, among other things, downturns
in the global economy. Downturns adversely affect our net sales, gross margin and net income.

We rely heavily on certain customers for much of our sales.

Our two largest customers for fiscal year 2017 were Airbus S.A.S. (which includes Satair A/S) and The
Boeing Company (which includes Aviall, Inc.). Airbus S.A.S. accounted for approximately 13% of our net sales
and The Boeing Company accounted for approximately 11% of our net sales in fiscal year 2017. Our top ten
customers for fiscal year 2017 accounted for approximately 46% of our net sales. A material reduction in
purchasing by one of our larger customers for any reason, including but not limited to economic downturn,
decreased production, strike or resourcing, could have a material adverse effect on our net sales, gross margin
and net income.

8

We generally do not have guaranteed future sales of our products. Further, when we enter into fixed price
contracts with some of our customers, we take the risk for cost overruns.

As is customary in our business, we do not generally have long-term contracts with most of our aftermarket
customers and, therefore, do not have guaranteed future sales. Although we have long-term contracts with many
of our OEM customers, many of those customers may terminate the contracts on short notice and, in most cases,
our customers have not committed to buy any minimum quantity of our products. In addition, in certain cases, we
must anticipate the future volume of orders based upon the historic purchasing patterns of customers and upon
our discussions with customers as to their anticipated future requirements, and this anticipated future volume of
orders may not materialize.

We also have entered into multi-year, fixed-price contracts with some of our customers, pursuant to which

we have agreed to perform the work for a fixed price and, accordingly, realize all the benefit or detriment
resulting from any decreases or increases in the costs of making these products. Sometimes we accept a fixed-
price contract for a product that we have not yet produced, and this increases the risk of cost overruns or delays
in the completion of the design and manufacturing of the product. Most of our contracts do not permit us to
recover increases in raw material prices, taxes or labor costs.

U.S. military spending is dependent upon the U.S. defense budget.

The military and defense market is significantly dependent upon government budget trends, particularly the
U.S. Department of Defense (the “DOD”) budget. In addition to normal business risks, our supply of products to
the United States Government is subject to unique risks largely beyond our control. DOD budgets could be
negatively impacted by several factors, including, but not limited to, a change in defense spending policy by the
current presidential administration, the U.S. Government’s budget deficits, spending priorities, the cost of
sustaining the U.S. military presence internationally and possible political pressure to reduce U.S. Government
military spending, each of which could cause the DOD budget to remain unchanged or to decline. A significant
decline in U.S. military expenditures could result in a reduction in the amount of our products sold to the various
agencies and buying organizations of the U.S. Government.

We intend to pursue acquisitions. Our business may be adversely affected if we cannot consummate
acquisitions on satisfactory terms, or if we cannot effectively integrate acquired operations.

A significant portion of our growth has occurred through acquisitions. Any future growth through
acquisitions will be partially dependent upon the continued availability of suitable acquisition candidates at
favorable prices and upon advantageous terms and conditions. We intend to pursue acquisitions that we believe
will present opportunities consistent with our overall business strategy. However, we may not be able to find
suitable acquisition candidates to purchase or may be unable to acquire desired businesses or assets on
economically acceptable terms or may be unable to receive necessary regulatory approvals or support. In
addition, we may not be able to raise the capital necessary to fund future acquisitions. Because we may actively
pursue a number of opportunities simultaneously, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, complications and
delays, including regulatory complications or difficulties in employing sufficient staff and maintaining
operational and management oversight.

We regularly engage in discussions with respect to potential acquisition and investment opportunities. If we

consummate an acquisition, our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly. Future
acquisitions could result in margin dilution and further likely result in the incurrence of additional debt and
contingent liabilities and an increase in interest and amortization expenses or periodic impairment charges related
to goodwill and other intangible assets as well as significant charges relating to integration costs.

Acquisitions involve risks that the businesses acquired will not perform in accordance with expectations and

that business judgments concerning the value, strengths and weaknesses of businesses acquired will prove

9

incorrect. In addition, we may not be able to successfully integrate any business we acquire into our existing
business. The successful integration of new businesses depends on our ability to manage these new businesses
and cut excess costs. The successful integration of future acquisitions may also require substantial attention from
our senior management and the management of the acquired business, which could decrease the time that they
have to service, attract customers and develop new products and services or attend to other acquisition
opportunities.

We are subject to certain unique business risks as a result of supplying equipment and services to the U.S.
Government.

Companies engaged in supplying defense-related equipment and services to U.S. Government agencies are
subject to business risks specific to the defense industry. These risks include the ability of the U.S. Government
to unilaterally:

•

•

•

•

suspend us from receiving new contracts based on alleged violations of procurement laws or
regulations;

terminate existing contracts;

reduce the value of existing contracts; and

audit our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs.

Most of our U.S. Government contracts can be terminated by the U.S. Government for its convenience

without significant notice. Termination for convenience provisions provide only for our recovery of costs
incurred or committed, settlement expenses and profit on the work completed prior to termination.

On contracts for which the price is based on cost, the U.S. Government may review our costs and

performance, as well as our accounting and general business practices. Based on the results of such audits, the
U.S. Government may adjust our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs. In addition,
under U.S. Government purchasing regulations, some of our costs, including most financing costs, amortization
of intangible assets, portions of research and development costs, and certain marketing expenses may not be
subject to reimbursement.

Furthermore, even where the price is not based on cost, the U.S. Government may seek to review our costs
to determine whether our pricing is “fair and reasonable.” Our subsidiaries are periodically subject to a pricing
review and in fact, government buying agencies that purchase some of our subsidiaries’ products are currently
the subject of a DOD Office of Inspector General audit with respect to prices paid for such products. Pricing
reviews and government audits, including the one underway, could be costly and time consuming for our
management and could distract from our ability to effectively manage the business. As a result of such a review,
we could be subject to providing a refund to the U.S. Government or we could be asked to enter into an
arrangement whereby our prices would be based on cost or the DOD could seek to pursue alternative sources of
supply for our parts. Any of those occurrences could lead to a reduction in our revenue from, or the profitability
of certain of our supply arrangements with, certain agencies and buying organizations of the U.S. Government.

Moreover, U.S. Government purchasing regulations contain a number of additional operation requirements,

which do not apply to entities not engaged in government contracting. Failure to comply with such government
contracting requirements could result in civil and criminal penalties that could have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s results of operations.

Our business may be adversely affected if we would lose our government or industry approvals or if more
stringent government regulations are enacted or if industry oversight is increased.

The aerospace industry is highly regulated in the United States and in other countries. In order to sell our

components, we and the components we manufacture must be certified by the FAA, the DOD and similar

10

agencies in foreign countries and by individual manufacturers. If new and more stringent government regulations
are adopted or if industry oversight increases, we might incur significant expenses to comply with any new
regulations or heightened industry oversight. In addition, if material authorizations or approvals were revoked or
suspended, our business would be adversely affected.

In addition to the aviation approvals, we are at times required to obtain approval from U.S. Government

agencies to export our products. Failure to obtain approval to export or determination by the U.S. Government
that we failed to receive required approvals or licenses could eliminate or restrict our ability to sell our products
outside the United States, and the penalties that could be imposed by the U.S. Government for failure to comply
with these laws could be significant.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and could harm our ability to react to
changes to our business and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2017, our total indebtedness, excluding

approximately $16 million of letters of credit outstanding, was approximately $11.8 billion, which was 133.5%
of our total book capitalization as a result of our dividends being funded, in part, with indebtedness and the
addition of approximately $1.6 billion in net new incremental borrowings during fiscal 2017.

In addition, we may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. For example, as of

September 30, 2017, we had approximately $584 million of unused commitments under our revolving loan
facility. Although our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the various senior subordinated
notes outstanding (the “Indentures”) contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these
restrictions are subject to a number of significant qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in
compliance with these qualifications and exceptions could be substantial. For example, if the usage of the
revolving loan facility exceeds 25% of the total revolving commitments, the Company will be required to
maintain a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing four-quarter EBITDA As
Defined. A breach of any of the covenants or an inability to comply with the required leverage ratio could result
in a default under the senior secured credit facility or the Indentures.

Our substantial debt could also have other important consequences to investors. For example, it could:

•

•

•

•

•

•

increase our vulnerability to general economic downturns and adverse competitive and industry
conditions;

increase the risk we are subjected to downgrade or put on a negative watch by the ratings agencies;

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our
indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital requirements,
capital expenditures, acquisitions, research and development efforts and other general corporate
requirements;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we
operate;

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and

limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the documents governing our
indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds, make investments and incur
liens.

In addition, all of our debt under the senior secured credit facility, which includes $7.0 billion in term loans

and a revolving loan facility of $600 million, bears interest at floating rates. Accordingly, if interest rates
increase, our debt service expense will also increase. Interest rate swap and cap agreements are used to manage
interest rate risk associated with floating-rate borrowings under our credit facilities. For information about our
interest rate swap and cap agreements, see Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging Instruments,” in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements included herein.

11

Our substantial level of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash

sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness,
including the Indentures. We cannot assure that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations
or that future borrowings will be available to us under the senior secured credit facility or otherwise in amounts
sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness. If we cannot service our debt, we will have to take actions
such as reducing or delaying capital investments, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt or seeking
additional equity capital.

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash
depends on many factors beyond our control and any failure to meet our debt service obligations could
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the Indentures, amounts
borrowed under the senior secured credit facility, amounts due under our Securitization Facility, and to fund our
operations, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

We cannot assure that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that currently
anticipated cost savings and operating improvements will be realized on schedule, or at all, or that future
borrowings will be available to us under the senior secured credit facility or otherwise in amounts sufficient to
enable us to service our indebtedness, including the amounts borrowed under the senior secured credit facility,
amounts borrowed under our Securitization Facility and the Indentures, or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we
cannot service our debt, we will have to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital investments, selling
assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt or seeking additional equity capital. We cannot assure that any of
these remedies could, if necessary, be effected on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Our ability to
restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at
such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more
onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. The terms of existing or future debt
instruments, the Securitization Facility, the Indentures and the senior secured credit facility may restrict us from
adopting any of these alternatives. In addition, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our
outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating, which could
harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness on acceptable terms and would otherwise adversely affect the
Indentures.

The terms of the senior secured credit facility and Indentures may restrict our current and future
operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes or to take certain actions.

Our senior secured credit facility and the Indentures contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose
significant operating and financial restrictions on TD Group, TransDigm Inc. and its subsidiaries (in the case of
the senior secured credit facility) and TransDigm Inc. and its subsidiaries (in the case of the Indentures) and may
limit their ability to engage in acts that may be in our long-term best interests. The senior secured credit facility
and Indentures include covenants restricting, among other things, the ability of TD Group, TransDigm Inc. and
its subsidiaries (in the case of the senior secured credit facility) and TransDigm Inc. and its subsidiaries (in the
case of the Indentures) to:

•

•

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock;

pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase our capital stock or redeem or repurchase our subordinated
debt;

• make investments;

•

•

sell assets;

enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from our restricted subsidiaries to us;

12

•

•

•

•

•

incur or allow to exist liens;

consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets;

engage in transactions with affiliates;

create unrestricted subsidiaries; and

engage in certain business activities.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the senior secured credit facility or the

Indentures. If any such default occurs, the lenders under the senior secured credit facility and the holders of the
senior subordinated notes may elect to declare all outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest and
other amounts payable thereunder, to be immediately due and payable. The lenders under the senior secured
credit facility also have the right in these circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide
further borrowings. In addition, following an event of default under the senior secured credit facility, the lenders
under that facility will have the right to proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the debt, which
includes our available cash, and they will also have the right to prevent us from making debt service payments on
the senior subordinated notes. If the debt under the senior secured credit facility or the senior subordinated notes
were to be accelerated, we cannot assure that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full our debt.

We could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws and
regulations.

Our operations and facilities are subject to a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws
and regulations that govern, among other things, discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the generation,
handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the remediation of contamination and the
health and safety of our employees. Environmental laws and regulations may require that the Company
investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. Certain facilities and third-party sites utilized by subsidiaries of the Company have been
identified as potentially responsible parties under the federal superfund laws and comparable state laws. The
Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under applicable laws.

Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations and
technology. These estimates take into consideration the Company’s prior experience and professional judgment
of the Company’s environmental advisors. Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are further
subject to uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of site contamination, the range of remediation
alternatives available, evolving remediation standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost estimates, the
extent of corrective actions that may be required and the number and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.

Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in the Company’s

accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such adjustments could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in a given period. Based on
currently available information, however, the Company does not believe that future environmental costs in
excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which the Company has been identified as a potentially
responsible party are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

We are dependent on our senior management team and highly trained employees and any work stoppage
or difficulty hiring similar employees could adversely affect our business.

Because our products are complicated and highly engineered, we depend on an educated and trained
workforce. There is substantial competition for skilled personnel in the aircraft component industry, and we
could be adversely affected by a shortage of skilled employees. We may not be able to fill new positions or
vacancies created by expansion or turnover or attract and retain qualified personnel.

13

Although we believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory, we cannot assure that we will be

able to negotiate a satisfactory renewal of collective bargaining agreements or that our employee relations will
remain stable. Because we maintain a relatively small inventory of finished goods, any work stoppage could
materially and adversely affect our ability to provide products to our customers.

In addition, our success depends in part on our ability to attract and motivate our senior management and
key employees. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to a variety of factors, including fluctuations in
economic and industry conditions, competitors’ hiring practices, and the effectiveness of our compensation
programs. Competition for qualified personnel can be intense. A loss of senior management and key personnel,
or failure to attract qualified new talent could prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities, and our
operating results and/or market value could be adversely affected. The Board continually monitors this risk and
we believe that the Board’s succession plan, together with our straightforward strategy, clear value drivers,
decentralized nature and the quality of managers running our operating units helps to mitigate this risk.

Our business is dependent on the availability of certain components and raw materials from suppliers.

Our business is affected by the price and availability of the raw materials and component parts that we use

to manufacture our components. Our business, therefore, could be adversely impacted by factors affecting our
suppliers (such as the destruction of our suppliers’ facilities or their distribution infrastructure, a work stoppage
or strike by our suppliers’ employees or the failure of our suppliers to provide materials of the requisite quality),
or by increased costs of such raw materials or components if we were unable to pass along such price increases to
our customers. Because we maintain a relatively small inventory of raw materials and component parts, our
business could be adversely affected if we were unable to obtain these raw materials and components from our
suppliers in the quantities we require or on favorable terms. Although we believe in most cases that we could
identify alternative suppliers, or alternative raw materials or component parts, the lengthy and expensive FAA
and OEM certification processes associated with aerospace products could prevent efficient replacement of a
supplier, raw material or component part.

Our operations depend on our manufacturing facilities, which are subject to physical and other risks that
could disrupt production.

A number of our manufacturing facilities are located in the greater Los Angeles area, an area known for
earthquakes, and are thus vulnerable to damage. In addition, a number of our manufacturing facilities are located
along the Eastern seaboard area susceptible to hurricanes. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of
disasters, including power loss, fire, explosions, floods, communications failures, terrorist attacks and similar
events. Disruptions could also occur due to cyber-attacks, computer or equipment malfunction (accidental or
intentional), operator error or process failures. Any disruption of our ability to operate our business could result
in a material decrease in our revenues or significant additional costs to replace, repair or insure our assets, which
could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Operations and sales outside of the United States may be subject to additional risks.

A number of risks inherent in international operations could have a material adverse effect on our results of

operations, including currency fluctuations, difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations,
general economic and political uncertainties and potential for social unrest in countries in which we operate,
limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies, restrictions on the repatriation of funds, change in
trade policies, tariff regulation, difficulties in obtaining export and import licenses and the risk of government
financed competition. Furthermore, the Company is subject to laws and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, UK Bribery Act and similar local anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their
employees, agents and contractors from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining
business. Failure to comply with these laws could subject the Company to civil and criminal penalties that could
materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

14

We face significant competition.

We operate in a highly competitive global industry and compete against a number of companies.

Competitors in our product lines are both U.S. and foreign companies and range in size from divisions of large
public corporations to small privately held entities. We believe that our ability to compete depends on high
product performance, consistent high quality, short lead-time and timely delivery, competitive pricing, superior
customer service and support and continued certification under customer quality requirements and assurance
programs. We may have to adjust the prices of some of our products to stay competitive.

We could be adversely affected if one of our components causes an aircraft to crash.

Our operations expose us to potential liabilities for personal injury or death as a result of the failure of an
aircraft component that we have designed, manufactured or serviced. While we maintain liability insurance to
protect us from future product liability claims, in the event of product liability claims our insurers may attempt to
deny coverage or any coverage we have may not be adequate. We also may not be able to maintain insurance
coverage in the future at an acceptable cost. Any liability not covered by insurance or for which third party
indemnification is not available could result in significant liability to us.

In addition, a crash caused by one of our components could damage our reputation for quality products. We
believe our customers consider safety and reliability as key criteria in selecting a provider of aircraft components.
If a crash were to be caused by one of our components, or if we were to otherwise fail to maintain a satisfactory
record of safety and reliability, our ability to retain and attract customers may be materially adversely affected.

We could incur substantial costs as a result of data protection concerns.

The interpretation and application of data protection laws in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are uncertain
and evolving. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with
our data practices. Compliance could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business
practices in a manner adverse to our business.

In addition, despite our efforts to protect confidential information, our facilities and systems may be
vulnerable to data loss, including cyber-attacks. This could lead to negative publicity, legal claims, theft,
modification or destruction of proprietary or key information, damage to or inaccessibility of critical systems,
manufacture of defective products, production downtimes, operational disruptions and other significant costs,
which could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

We have recorded a significant amount of intangible assets, which may never generate the returns we
expect.

Mergers and acquisitions have resulted in significant increases in identifiable intangible assets and goodwill.

Identifiable intangible assets, which primarily include trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, and technology,
were approximately $1.7 billion at September 30, 2017, representing approximately 17% of our total assets.
Goodwill recognized in accounting for the mergers and acquisitions was approximately $5.7 billion at
September 30, 2017, representing approximately 58% of our total assets. We may never realize the full value of
our identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, and to the extent we were to determine that our identifiable
intangible assets or our goodwill were impaired within the meaning of applicable accounting standards, we
would be required to write-off the amount of any impairment.

The Company may be subject to risks relating to changes in its tax rates or exposure to additional income
tax liabilities.

The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. The
Company’s domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the location of earnings among these
different jurisdictions. The Company’s future results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the

15

Company’s effective tax rate as a result of changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax
rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets, challenges by tax authorities or changes in tax laws or
regulations. In addition, the amount of income taxes paid by the Company is subject to ongoing audits by U.S.
federal, state and local tax authorities and by non-U.S. tax authorities. If these audits result in assessments
different from amounts reserved, future financial results may include unfavorable adjustments to the Company’s
tax liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Our stock price may be volatile, and an investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

There has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of equity securities, which is
unrelated to the operating performance of the companies issuing the securities. These market fluctuations may
negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Shareholders may not be able to sell their shares at or
above the purchase price due to fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. Such changes could be
caused by changes in our operating performance or prospects, including possible changes due to the cyclical
nature of the aerospace industry and other factors such as fluctuations in OEM and aftermarket ordering, which
could cause short-term swings in profit margins. Or such changes could be unrelated to our operating
performance, such as changes in market conditions affecting the stock market generally or the stocks of
aerospace companies or changes in the outlook for our common stock, such as changes to or the confidence in
our business strategy, changes to or confidence in our management, or expectations for future growth of the
Company.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could lower our share price.

We may sell additional shares of common stock into the public markets or issue convertible debt securities
to raise capital in the future. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large
number of shares of our common stock in the public markets or the perception that these sales could occur. These
sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity
securities to raise capital at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain certain provisions that could discourage, delay or
prevent a change in control of our company.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or
prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 149,600,000
shares of “blank check” preferred stock. Without stockholder approval, the Board of Directors has the authority
to attach special rights, including voting and dividend rights, to this preferred stock. With these rights, holders of
preferred stock could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. Our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation also provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the voting power of our
issued and outstanding capital stock, voting together as a single class, is required for the alteration, amendment or
repeal of certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and certain provisions of our
amended and restated bylaws, including the provisions relating to our stockholders’ ability to call special
meetings, notice provisions for stockholder business to be conducted at an annual meeting, requests for
stockholder lists and corporate records, nomination and removal of directors, and filling of vacancies on our
Board of Directors.

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law. Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not enter into a “business
combination” with that person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third party
from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of control. For purposes of Section 203,
“interested stockholder” means, generally, someone owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an

16

affiliate of ours that owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to
certain exceptions as described in Section 203.

We do not regularly declare and pay quarterly or annual cash dividends on our stock.

On July 3, 2013, June 4, 2014, October 14, 2016 and August 23, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors

authorized and declared special cash dividends of $22.00, $25.00, $24.00 and $22.00, respectively, on each
outstanding share of common stock and cash dividend equivalent payments to holders of options under its stock
option plans.

Notwithstanding the special cash dividends, we do not anticipate declaring regular quarterly or annual cash
dividends on our common stock or any other equity security in the foreseeable future. The amounts that may be
available to us to pay future special cash dividends are restricted under our debt and other agreements. Any
payment of special cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of
Directors and will depend on our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future
prospects, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Therefore,
shareholders should not rely on regular quarterly or annual dividend income from shares of our common stock
and should not rely on special dividends with any regularity or at all.

17

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

TransDigm’s principal owned properties as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

Location

Miesbach, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liberty, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Waco, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ingolstadt, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kent, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bridport, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liverpool, NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Union Gap, WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Phoenix, AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paks, Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Los Angeles, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bohemia, NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Llangeinor, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Westbury, NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Letchworth, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Placentia, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Addison, IL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Painesville, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Clearwater, FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
South Euclid, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wichita, KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Branford, CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Avenel, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rancho Cucamonga, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Herstal, Belgium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valencia, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsauken, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ryde, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rancho Cucamonga, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Arnsberg, Germany (Schroth)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Melaka, Malaysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deerfield Beach, FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reporting Segment

Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Non-aviation

Square
Footage

242,000
219,000
218,800
191,900
185,000
174,700
169,900
142,000
138,700
137,800
131,000
124,000
110,000
106,800
88,200
86,600
83,300
63,900
61,000
60,000
57,000
52,000
48,500
47,000
45,700
38,000
38,000
33,200
32,700
26,800
24,800
20,000

The Liberty, Kent, Union Gap, Bohemia, Addison, and 47,000 square feet Rancho Cucamonga property is

subject to mortgage liens under our senior secured credit facility.

18

TransDigm’s principal leased properties as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

Location

Santa Ana, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Holmestrand, Norway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dayton, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Everett, WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Whippany, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Whippany, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nittambuwa, Sri Lanka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fullerton, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anaheim, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Elkhart, IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collegeville, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goldsboro, NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Arnsberg, Germany (Schroth)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miesbach, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kunshan, China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Camarillo, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Matamoros, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tempe, AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chongqing, China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Northridge, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Erie, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ashford, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
London, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nogales, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kunshan, China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pompano Beach, FL (Schroth) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bridgend, United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Memphis, TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsauken, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Poway, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lund, Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cleveland, OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reporting Segment

Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Non-aviation
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Non-aviation
Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Airframe
Power & Control
Airframe
Power & Control
Power & Control
Power & Control

Square
Footage

159,200
149,300
144,000
121,000
115,300
114,300
113,000
100,000
99,900
91,500
90,000
87,600
86,000
80,800
75,300
70,000
60,500
40,200
37,700
35,000
30,500
28,000
27,400
27,000
25,600
25,000
24,800
20,800
20,500
12,800
17,600
13,100

Our Cleveland, OH and Pasadena, CA corporate facilities house our principal executive offices, and we

currently lease approximately 20,100 square feet and 5,300 square feet, respectively, for those purposes.
TransDigm also leases certain of its other non-material facilities. Management believes that our machinery,
plants and offices are in satisfactory operating condition and that it will have sufficient capacity to meet
foreseeable future needs without incurring significant additional capital expenditures.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

During the ordinary course of business, TransDigm is from time to time a party to legal actions and other
proceedings related to its businesses, products or operations. While TransDigm is currently involved in some
legal proceedings, management believes the results of these proceedings will not have a material effect on its
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

19

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the ticker symbol “TDG.”

The following chart sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of the common stock on
the NYSE.

Quarterly Stock Prices

Fiscal 2016
For Quarter ended January 2, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended April 2, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended July 2, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

High

Low

$238.51
232.42
268.00
294.38

$210.22
180.76
218.56
257.28

Fiscal 2017
For Quarter ended December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended April 1, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended July 1, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Quarter ended September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$293.19
259.57
274.99
295.00

$235.14
203.72
217.41
249.57

Holders

On November 3, 2017, there were 30 stockholders of record of our common stock. We estimate that there
were approximately 62,000 beneficial stockholders as of November 3, 2017, which includes an estimated amount
of stockholders who have their shares held in their accounts by banks and brokers.

Dividends

On October 14, 2016, TD Group’s Board of Directors authorized and declared a special cash dividend of
$24.00 on each outstanding share of common stock and cash dividend equivalent payments under options granted
under its stock option plans. The record date for the special dividend was October 24, 2016, and the payment date
for the dividend was November 1, 2016. On August 23, 2017, TD Group’s Board of Directors authorized and
declared a special cash dividend of $22.00 on each outstanding share of common stock and cash dividend
equivalent payments under options granted under its stock option plans. The record date for the special dividend
was September 5, 2017, and the payment date for the dividend was September 12, 2017. No dividends were
declared in fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2016.

We do not anticipate declaring regular quarterly or annual cash dividends on our common stock in the near
future. Any declaration of special cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be at the discretion of
our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial
condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions under the senior secured credit facility and Indentures, the
availability of surplus under Delaware law and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. TD
Group is a holding company and conducts all of its operations through direct and indirect subsidiaries. Unless TD
Group receives dividends, distributions, advances, transfers of funds or other payments from our subsidiaries, TD
Group will be unable to pay any dividends on our common stock in the future. The ability of any subsidiaries to
take any of the foregoing actions is limited by the terms of our senior secured credit facility and Indentures and
may be limited by future debt or other agreements that we may enter into.

20

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total return of a hypothetical investment in the
shares of common stock of TD Group with the cumulative total return of a hypothetical investment in each of the
S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) and the S&P MidCap 400 S&P Aerospace & Defense Index based on the respective
market prices of each such investment on the dates shown below, assuming an initial investment of $100 on
September 30, 2012.

The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” nor to

be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent we
specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among TransDigm Group Inc., the S&P 500
and S&P MidCap 400 S&P Aerospace & Defense Index

$400

$350

$300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

9/12

9/13

9/14

9/15

9/16

9/17

TransDigm Group Inc.

S&P MidCap 400 S&P Aerospace & Defense Index

S&P 500

*$100 invested on 9/30/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending September 30.

Copyright 2017 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

TransDigm Group Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P MidCap 400 S&P Aerospace & Defense Index . . . .

100.00 124.01
100.00 119.34
100.00 154.70

311.08
189.37 218.22
142.89 142.02
194.44
209.81 205.33 254.85 371.15

297.03
163.93

9/30/12

9/30/13

9/30/14

9/30/15

9/30/16

9/30/17

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer or Affiliated Purchaser

On October 22, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program permitting us to
repurchase a portion of our outstanding shares not to exceed $300 million in the aggregate. No shares were
repurchased under the program in fiscal 2015. On January 21, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program replacing the $300 million program with a repurchase program permitting us to repurchase a

21

portion of our outstanding shares not to exceed $450 million in the aggregate, subject to any restrictions specified
in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures. During fiscal 2016, under the aforementioned authorized programs,
the Company repurchased 1,015,387 shares of its common stock at a gross cost of approximately $207.8 million
at the weighted-average price per share of $204.61.

On January 26, 2017, our Board of Directors increased the authorized amount of repurchases allowable

under the stock program from $450 million to $472 million. The increase in the allowable repurchases aligned
the program with the restricted payments allowable under the Credit Agreement. During January 2017, the
Company repurchased 666,755 shares of its common stock at a gross cost of approximately $150 million at the
weighted average cost of $224.97 under the $472 million stock repurchase program. On March 7, 2017, our
Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program replacing the $472 million program permitting
repurchases of outstanding shares not to exceed $600 million in the aggregate, subject to any restrictions
specified in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures governing the existing Notes. During March 2017, the
Company repurchased 851,069 shares of its common stock at a gross cost of approximately $189.8 million at the
weighted average cost of $223.05 under the new $600 million stock repurchase program. Additionally, during
May 2017, the Company repurchased 205,800 shares of its common stock at a gross cost of approximately
$50 million at the weighted average cost of $242.90 under the new $600 million stock repurchase program. As of
September 30, 2017, the remaining amount of repurchases allowable under the $600 million program was
$360.2 million subject to any restrictions specified in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures governing the
existing Notes as described within the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Item 7.—“Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.”

On November 8, 2017, our Board of Directors, authorized a new stock repurchase program replacing the

$600 million program permitting repurchases of our outstanding shares not to exceed $650 million in the
aggregate, subject to any restrictions specified in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures governing the existing
Notes.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company received 2,548 shares in each
period as forfeitures in lieu of payment for withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock. The deemed gross
cost of the shares was approximately $0.6 million in each period at a weighted-average price per share of
$247.33 and $225.58, respectively.

22

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial and other data of TD Group for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 to 2017, which have been derived from TD Group’s audited consolidated
financial statements.

Separate historical financial information of TransDigm Inc. is not presented since the 5.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes issued in October 2012 (the “2020 Notes”), the 6.00% Senior Subordinated Notes issued in
June 2014 (the “2022 Notes”), the 6.50% Senior Subordinated Notes issued June 2014 (the “2024 Notes”), the
6.50% Senior Subordinated Notes issued May 2015 (the “2025 Notes”) and the 6.375% Senior Subordinated
Notes issued June 2016 (the “2026 Notes”) (also together with the 2020 Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2024 Notes,
the 2025 Notes, and the 2026 Notes, the “Notes”) are guaranteed by TD Group and all direct and indirect
domestic restricted subsidiaries of TransDigm Inc. and since TD Group has no operations or significant assets
separate from its investment in TransDigm Inc.

Acquisitions of businesses and product lines completed by TD Group during the last five fiscal years are as

follows:

Date

Acquisition

June 5, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aerosonic Corporation
June 5, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arkwin Industries, Inc.
June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Whippany Actuation
December 19, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Airborne Global Inc. (“Airborne”)
March 6, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Elektro-Metall Export GmbH (“EME”)
March 26, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telair Cargo Group (comprised of Telair International GmbH (“Telair

Europe”), Telair US LLC and Nordisk Aviation Products)

March 31, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Franke Aquarotter GmbH (“Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH”)
May 14, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pexco LLC (“Pexco Aerospace”)
August 19, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PneuDraulics, Inc. (“PneuDraulics”)
January 4, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Breeze-Eastern Corporation (“Breeze-Eastern”)
June 23, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Data Device Corporation (“DDC”)
September 23, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Young & Franklin Inc. / Tactair Fluid Controls Inc. (“Y&F/Tactair”)
February 22, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schroth Safety Products Group (“Schroth”)
May 5, 2017, May 31, 2017 and
June 1, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

North Hills Signal Processing Corp, Cablecraft Motion Controls LLC and
Preece Incorporated (together, the “Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions”)

All of the acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method. The results of operations of the
acquired businesses and product lines are included in TD Group’s consolidated financial statements from the
effective date of each acquisition. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to disposing of
Schroth in connection with the settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of
the acquisition. Therefore, Schroth was classified as held-for-sale and as discontinued operations as of
September 30, 2017.

23

The information presented below should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of

Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included elsewhere herein.

Fiscal Years Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Statement of Income Data:
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,504,286 $3,171,411 $2,707,115 $2,372,906 $1,924,400
1,049,562
1,984,627
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit(1)
254,468
415,575
Selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . .
45,639
89,226
Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,449,845
321,624
54,219

1,267,874
276,446
63,608

1,728,063
382,858
77,445

Income from operations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense—net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Refinancing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,479,826
602,589
39,807

1,267,760
483,850
15,794

1,074,002
418,785
18,393

927,820
347,688
131,622

Income from continuing operations before

income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

837,430
208,889

768,116
181,702

636,824
189,612

448,510
141,600

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from discontinued operations, net

628,541

586,414

447,212

306,910

749,455
270,685
30,281

448,489
145,700

302,789

of tax(5)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(31,654)

—

—

—

—

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 596,887 $ 586,414 $ 447,212 $ 306,910 $ 302,789

Net income applicable to common stock . . . . . . . $ 437,630 $ 583,414 $ 443,847 $ 180,284 $ 131,546

Denominator for basic and diluted earnings
per share under the two-class method:
Weighted-average common shares

outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52,517

53,326

53,112

52,748

52,258

Vested options deemed participating

securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,013

2,831

3,494

4,245

2,822

Total shares for basic and diluted earnings

per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,530

56,157

56,606

56,993

55,080

Net earnings per share:

Net earnings per share from continuing

operations—basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . $

8.45 $

10.39 $

7.84 $

3.16 $

2.39

Net loss per share from discontinued

operations—basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . .

(0.57)

—

—

—

Net earnings per share(2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

7.88 $

10.39 $

7.84 $

3.16 $

—

2.39

Cash dividends paid per common share . . . . $

46.00 $

— $

— $

25.00 $

34.85

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

As of September 30,

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1,262,558
2,178,094
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital(3,4)
Total assets(3,4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,975,661 10,726,277
Long-term debt, including current portion(4) . . . . 11,762,661 10,195,607
Stockholders’ deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,951,204)

650,561 $ 1,586,994 $

1,066,735
1,128,993
6,626,786
8,303,935
7,380,738
8,349,602
(651,490) (1,038,306) (1,556,099)

819,548 $ 564,740
968,207
6,046,029
5,658,570
(336,381)

714,033 $

24

(1) Gross profit and income from operations include the effect of charges relating to purchase accounting

adjustments to inventory associated with the acquisition of various businesses and product lines for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 of $20,621, $23,449, $11,362, $10,441
and $7,352, respectively.

(2) Net earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the basic and

(3)

(4)

diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.
In connection with adopting ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” for reporting
periods ended after October 1, 2015, the Company reclassified $45,375, $37,669, and $30,182 from current
deferred income tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of September 2015, 2014, and 2013,
respectively, to non-current deferred income tax liabilities.
In connection with adopting ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” for
reporting periods ended after October 1, 2015, the Company reclassified $77,740, $92,393, and $72,668
from debt issuance costs in our consolidated balance sheets as of September 2015, 2014, and 2013,
respectively, to the current portion of long-term and long-term-term debt.

(5) During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to disposing of Schroth in connection with the

settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of the acquisition. Therefore,
Schroth was classified as held-for-sale and as discontinued operations as of September 30, 2017. The
Company acquired Schroth in February 2017 (refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions”). The loss from discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended September 30, 2017 includes a
$32.0 million impairment charge to write down the assets to fair value. Refer to Note 22, “Discontinued
Operations,” for further information.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We present below certain financial information based on our EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined.

References to “EBITDA” mean earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and references to
“EBITDA As Defined” mean EBITDA plus, as applicable for each relevant period, certain adjustments as set
forth in the reconciliations of net income to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined and the reconciliations of net
cash provided by operating activities to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined presented below.

Neither EBITDA nor EBITDA As Defined is a measurement of financial performance under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We present EBITDA and EBITDA As
Defined because we believe they are useful indicators for evaluating operating performance and liquidity.

Our management believes that EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined are useful as indicators of liquidity
because securities analysts, investors, rating agencies and others use EBITDA to evaluate a company’s ability to
incur and service debt. In addition, EBITDA As Defined is useful to investors because the revolving
commitments under our senior secured credit facility requires compliance under certain circumstances, on a pro
forma basis, with a financial covenant that measures the ratio of the amount of our secured indebtedness to the
amount of our Consolidated EBITDA defined in the same manner as we define EBITDA As Defined herein.

In addition to the above, our management uses EBITDA As Defined to review and assess the performance
of the management team in connection with employee incentive programs and to prepare its annual budget and
financial projections. Moreover, our management uses EBITDA As Defined to evaluate acquisitions.

Although we use EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined as measures to assess the performance of our business
and for the other purposes set forth above, the use of these non-GAAP financial measures as analytical tools has
limitations, and you should not consider any of them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results of
operations as reported in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•

neither EBITDA nor EBITDA As Defined reflects the significant interest expense, or the cash
requirements necessary to service interest payments, on our indebtedness;

25

•

•

•

although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and
amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and neither EBITDA nor EBITDA As Defined
reflects any cash requirements for such replacements;

the omission of the substantial amortization expense associated with our intangible assets further limits
the usefulness of EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined;

neither EBITDA nor EBITDA As Defined includes the payment of taxes, which is a necessary element
of our operations; and

• EBITDA As Defined excludes the cash expense we have incurred to integrate acquired businesses into

our operations, which is a necessary element of certain of our acquisitions.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined should not be considered as measures of

discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. Management compensates for these
limitations by not viewing EBITDA or EBITDA As Defined in isolation and specifically by using other GAAP
measures, such as net income, net sales and operating profit, to measure our operating performance. Neither
EBITDA nor EBITDA As Defined is a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, and neither should
be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations determined in accordance with
GAAP. Our calculation of EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined may not be comparable to the calculation of
similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

(in thousands)

Other Financial Data:
Cash flows provided by (used in):

Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1) . . . . . .

$

788,733 $
(287,003)
(1,443,682)
141,025
71,013
2.4x

683,298
(1,443,046)
1,632,467
121,670
43,982
2.6x

$

520,938 $ 541,222 $ 470,205
(502,442)
(329,638)
156,195
43,973
73,515
96,385
35,535
34,146
2.6x
2.3x

(1,679,149)
1,054,947
93,663
54,871
2.5x

Other Data:
EBITDA(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,581,044
$ 1,710,563
EBITDA As Defined(2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,373,636 $ 1,149,272 $ 892,583
$ 1,233,654 $1,073,207
$ 1,495,196

$ 792,689
$ 900,278

(1) For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of earnings from

continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense,
amortization of debt issuance costs, original issue discount and premium and the portion (approximately
33%) of rental expense that management believes is representative of the interest component of rental
expense.

(2) EBITDA represents earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and

amortization. EBITDA As Defined represents EBITDA plus, as applicable for each relevant period, certain
adjustments as set forth in the reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined and the
reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined presented
below. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information and limitations regarding these
non-GAAP financial measures.

26

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from discontinued operations, net of

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

$ 596,887 $ 586,414 $ 447,212 $ 306,910

$302,789

(in thousands)

tax(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(31,654)

—

—

—

—

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:

Depreciation and amortization

628,541

586,414

447,212

306,910

302,789

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141,025
602,589
208,889

121,670
483,850
181,702

93,663
418,785
189,612

96,385
347,688
141,600

73,515
270,685
145,700

EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:

Inventory purchase accounting

adjustments(2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition integration costs(3) . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition transaction-related

1,581,044

1,373,636

1,149,272

892,583

792,689

20,621
6,341

23,449
18,539

11,362
12,554

10,441
7,239

7,352
10,942

expenses(4)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,229

15,711

12,289

3,480

8,139

Non-cash stock and deferred

compensation expense(5) . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Refinancing costs(6)
Other, net(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45,524
39,807
12,997

48,306
15,794
(239)

31,500
18,393
(1,716)

26,332
131,622
1,510

48,884
30,281
1,991

EBITDA As Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,710,563

$1,495,196

$1,233,654

$1,073,207

$900,278

(1) During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to disposing of Schroth in connection with the

settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of the acquisition. Therefore,
Schroth was classified as held-for-sale and as discontinued operations as of September 30, 2017. The
Company acquired Schroth in February 2017 (refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions”). The loss from discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended September 30, 2017 includes a
$32.0 million impairment charge to write down the assets to fair value. Refer to Note 22, “Discontinued
Operations,” for further information.

(2) Represents accounting adjustments to inventory associated with acquisitions of businesses and product lines

that were charged to cost of sales when the inventory was sold.

(3) Represents costs incurred to integrate acquired businesses and product lines into TD Group’s operations,

facility relocation costs and other acquisition-related costs.

(4) Represents transaction-related costs comprising deal fees; legal, financial and tax due diligence expenses;

and valuation costs that are required to be expensed as incurred.

(5) Represents the compensation expense recognized by TD Group under our stock incentive plans.
(6) Represents costs expensed related to debt financing activities, including new issuances, extinguishments,

refinancings and amendments to existing agreements.

(7) Primarily represents gain or loss on sale of fixed assets, foreign currency transaction gain or loss and

employer withholding taxes on dividend equivalent payments. In the periods prior to fiscal 2017, foreign
currency transaction gain or loss other than related to intercompany loans is not included in the adjustments
to EBITDA, as the foreign currency transaction gain or loss was immaterial during those periods.

27

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to EBITDA and

EBITDA As Defined:

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . .
Adjustments:

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of

effects from acquisitions of
businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on sale of real estate . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net(1)
Income tax provision—current(2) . . . . . . .
Non-cash stock and deferred

compensation expense(3) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock
options(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Refinancing costs(4)
EBITDA from discontinued

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

$ 788,733 $ 683,298 $ 520,938 $ 541,222

$470,205

(in thousands)

83,753
—
581,483
215,385

110,905
—
467,639
175,894

24,322
—
402,988
188,952

(27,967)
804
333,753
151,016

(71,618)
—
258,752
148,314

(45,524)

(48,306)

(31,500)

(26,332)

(48,884)

—
(39,807)

—
(15,794)

61,965
(18,393)

51,709
(131,622)

66,201
(30,281)

operations(9)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,979)

—

—

—

—

EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:

Inventory purchase accounting

adjustments(5)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition integration costs(6) . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition transaction-related

1,581,044

1,373,636

1,149,272

892,583

792,689

20,621
6,341

23,449
18,539

11,362
12,554

10,441
7,239

7,352
10,942

expenses(7)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,229

15,711

12,289

3,480

8,139

Non-cash stock and deferred

compensation expense(3) . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Refinancing costs(4)
Other, net(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45,524
39,807
12,997

48,306
15,794
(239)

31,500
18,393
(1,716)

26,332
131,622
1,510

48,884
30,281
1,991

EBITDA As Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,710,563

$1,495,196

$1,233,654

$1,073,207

$900,278

(1) Represents interest expense excluding the amortization of debt issuance costs, original issue discount and

premium.

(2) For the period ended September 30, 2016, the income tax provision and excess tax benefit from exercise of

stock options were impacted by the adoption of ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting.” Refer to Note 4, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.

(3) Represents the compensation expense recognized by TD Group under our stock incentive plans.
(4) Represents costs expensed related to debt financing activities, including new issuances, extinguishments,

refinancings and amendments to existing agreements.

(5) Represents accounting adjustments to inventory associated with acquisitions of businesses and product lines

that were charged to cost of sales when the inventory was sold.

(6) Represents costs incurred to integrate acquired businesses and product lines into TD Group’s operations,

facility relocation costs and other acquisition-related costs.

(7) Represents transaction-related costs comprising deal fees; legal, financial and tax due diligence expenses;

and valuation costs that are required to be expensed as incurred.

(8) Primarily represents gain or loss on sale of fixed assets, foreign currency transaction gain or loss and

employer withholding taxes on dividend equivalent payments. In the periods prior to fiscal 2017, foreign

28

currency transaction gain or loss other than related to intercompany loans is not included in the adjustments
to EBITDA, as the foreign currency transaction gain or loss was immaterial during those periods.

(9) During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to disposing of Schroth in connection with the

settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of the acquisition. Therefore,
Schroth was classified as held-for-sale and as discontinued operations as of September 30, 2017. Refer to
Note 22, “Discontinued Operations,” for further information.

29

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with

“Selected Financial Data” and TD Group’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this report. The following discussion may contain predictions, estimates and other forward-looking
statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the heading entitled
“Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this report. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially
from any future performance suggested below.

Overview

For fiscal year 2017, we generated net sales of $3,504.3 million, gross profit of $1,984.6 million or 56.6% of

sales, and net income of $596.9 million. We believe we have achieved steady, long-term growth in sales and
improvements in operating performance since our formation in 1993 due to our competitive strengths and
through execution of our value-driven operating strategy. More specifically, focusing our businesses on our
value-driven operating strategy of obtaining profitable new business, carefully controlling the cost structure and
pricing our highly engineered value-added products to fairly reflect the value we provide and the resources
required to do so has historically resulted in improvements in gross profit and income from operations over the
long term.

Our selective acquisition strategy has also contributed to the growth of our business. The integration of
certain acquisitions into our existing businesses combined with implementing our proven operating strategy has
historically resulted in improvements of the financial performance of the acquired business.

We believe our key competitive strengths include:

Large and Growing Installed Product Base with Aftermarket Revenue Stream. We provide components to

a large and growing installed base of aircraft to which we supply aftermarket products. We estimate that our
products are installed on approximately 95,000 commercial transport, regional transport, military and general
aviation fixed wing turbine aircraft and rotary wing aircraft.

Diversified Revenue Base. We believe that our diversified revenue base reduces our dependence on any

particular product, platform or market channel and has been a significant factor in maintaining our financial
performance. Our products are installed on almost all of the major commercial aircraft platforms now in
production. We expect to continue to develop new products for military and commercial applications.

Barriers to Entry. We believe that the niche nature of our markets, the industry’s stringent regulatory and
certification requirements, the large number of products that we sell and the investments necessary to develop
and certify products create potential disincentives to competition for certain products.

Our business strategy is made up of two key elements: (1) a value-driven operating strategy focused around

our three core value drivers and (2) a selective acquisition strategy.

Value-Driven Operating Strategy. Our three core value drivers are:

• Obtaining Profitable New Business. We attempt to obtain profitable new business by using our

technical expertise and application skill and our detailed knowledge of our customer base and the
individual niche markets in which we operate. We have regularly been successful in identifying and
developing both aftermarket and OEM products to drive our growth.

•

Improving Our Cost Structure. We are committed to maintaining and continuously improving our lean
cost structure through detailed attention to the cost of each of the products that we offer and our
organizational structure, with a focus on reducing the cost of each.

30

• Providing Highly Engineered Value-Added Products to Customers. We focus on the engineering,

manufacturing and marketing of a broad range of highly engineered niche products that we believe
provide value to our customers. We believe we have been consistently successful in communicating to
our customers the value of our products. This has generally enabled us to price our products to fairly
reflect the value we provide and the resources required to do so.

Selective Acquisition Strategy. We selectively pursue the acquisition of proprietary aerospace component

businesses when we see an opportunity to create value through the application of our three core value-driven
operating strategies. The aerospace industry, in particular, remains highly fragmented, with many of the
companies in the industry being small private businesses or small non-core operations of larger businesses. We
have significant experience among our management team in executing acquisitions and integrating acquired
businesses into our company and culture. As of the date of this report, we have successfully acquired
approximately 60 businesses and/or product lines since our formation in 1993. Many of these acquisitions have
been integrated into an existing TransDigm production facility, which enables a higher production capacity
utilization, which in turn improves gross profit levels due to the ability to spread the fixed manufacturing
overhead costs over higher production volume.

Acquisitions during the previous three fiscal years are more fully described in Note 2, “Acquisitions,” in the

notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which often requires

the judgment of management in the selection and application of certain accounting principles and methods.
Management believes that the quality and reasonableness of our most critical policies enable the fair presentation
of our financial position and results of operations. However, investors are cautioned that the sensitivity of
financial statements to these methods, assumptions and estimates could create materially different results under
different conditions or using different assumptions.

Below are those policies applied in preparing our financial statements that management believes are the
most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions. For additional accounting policies, see Note 3,
“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included
herein.

Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances: Revenue is recognized from the sale of products when title

and risk of loss passes to the customer, which is generally at the time of shipment. Substantially all product sales
are made pursuant to firm, fixed-price purchase orders received from customers. Collectibility of amounts
recorded as revenue is reasonably assured at the time of sale. Provisions for returns, uncollectible accounts and
the cost of repairs under contract warranty provisions are provided for in the same period as the related revenues
are recorded and are principally based on historical results modified, as appropriate, by the most current
information available. We have a history of making reasonably dependable estimates of such allowances;
however, due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is possible that actual results may vary from
the estimates and the differences could be material.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Management estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the
aging of the accounts receivable and customer creditworthiness. The allowance also incorporates a provision for
the estimated impact of disputes with customers. Management’s estimate of the allowance amounts that are
necessary includes amounts for specifically identified credit losses and estimated credit losses based on historical
information. The determination of the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to significant
levels of judgment and estimation by management. Depending on the resolution of potential credit and other
collection issues, or if the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate and their
ability to make required payments were to become impaired, increases in these allowances may be required.
Historically, changes in estimates in the allowance for doubtful accounts have not been significant.

31

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories is generally determined
by the average cost and the first-in, first-out (FIFO) methods and includes material, labor and overhead related to
the manufacturing process. Because the Company sells products that are installed on airframes that can be
in-service for 25 or more years, it must keep a supply of such products on hand while the airframes are in use.
Where management estimated that the current market value was below cost or determined that future demand
was lower than current inventory levels, based on historical experience, current and projected market demand,
current and projected volume trends and other relevant current and projected factors associated with the current
economic conditions, a reduction in inventory cost to estimated net realizable value was made by recording a
provision included in cost of sales. Although management believes that the Company’s estimates of excess and
obsolete inventory are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the estimates and additional
provisions may be required in the future. In addition, in accordance with industry practice, all inventories are
classified as current assets as all inventories are available and necessary to support current sales, even though a
portion of the inventories may not be sold within one year. Historically, changes in estimates in the net realizable
value of inventories have not been significant.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: In accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” the
Company uses the acquisition method of accounting to allocate costs of acquired businesses to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess costs
of acquired businesses over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized as
goodwill. The valuations of the acquired assets and liabilities will impact the determination of future operating
results. In addition to using management estimates and negotiated amounts, the Company used a variety of
information sources to determine the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities including third-party
appraisals for the estimated value and lives of identifiable intangible assets. Fair value adjustments to the
Company’s assets and liabilities are recognized and the results of operations of the acquired business are
included in our consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the merger or acquisition.

Intangible assets other than goodwill are recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through

contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed or exchanged,
regardless of the Company’s intent to do so. Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are recorded at their
estimated fair value on the date of acquisition and are reviewed at least annually for impairment based on cash
flow projections and fair value estimates.

GAAP requires that the annual, and any interim, impairment assessment be performed at the reporting unit

level. The reporting unit level is one level below an operating segment. Substantially all goodwill was
determined and recognized for each reporting unit pursuant to the accounting for the merger or acquisition as of
the date of each transaction. With respect to acquisitions integrated into an existing reporting unit, any acquired
goodwill is combined with the goodwill of the reporting unit.

At the time of goodwill impairment testing, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine
whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and
whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The quantitative test is required
only if the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its
carrying amount, or if the Company elects not to perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit. For the
quantitative test, management determines the estimated fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow
valuation model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. If the
calculated estimated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of goodwill of the reporting
unit may exist. The use of a discounted cash flow valuation model to determine estimated fair value is common
practice in impairment testing. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model for
impairment testing includes discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount
rates are set by using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) methodology. The WACC methodology
considers market and industry data as well as company specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining
the appropriate discount rates to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the
return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a business.

32

Management, considering industry and company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth

rates, sales projections and cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination
follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last
projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. As an indicator that each reporting
unit has been valued appropriately through the use of the discounted cash flow valuation model, the aggregate of
all reporting unit’s estimated fair value is reconciled to the total market capitalization of the Company.

The Company had 34 reporting units with goodwill as of the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017,

the date of the last annual impairment test. The estimated fair values of each of the reporting units was
substantially in excess of their respective carrying values, and therefore, no goodwill impairment was recorded.
The Company performed a sensitivity analysis on the discount rate, which is a significant assumption in the
calculation of fair values. With a one percentage point increase in the discount rate, nearly all of the reporting
units would continue to have fair values substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.

Management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at the asset level, as determined by
appropriate asset valuation at the time of acquisition. The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets
consists of a comparison between the estimated fair values and carrying values. If the carrying amounts of
intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives exceed their estimated fair values, an impairment loss will be
recognized in an amount equal to the difference. Management utilizes the royalty savings valuation method to
determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset. In this method, management
estimates the royalty savings arising from the ownership of the intangible asset. The key assumptions used in
estimating the royalty savings for impairment testing include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales
projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates used are similar to the rates developed by the WACC
methodology considering any differences in company-specific risk factors between reporting units and the
indefinite-lived intangible assets. Royalty rates are established by management with the advice of valuation
experts and periodically substantiated by valuation experts. Management, considering industry and company-
specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections for each significant intangible
asset. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of
perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth
rates.

The discounted cash flow and royalty savings valuation methodologies require management to make certain

assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuations are performed. Actual results could
differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market
participant would have used in calculating fair value considering the current economic conditions.

Stock-Based Compensation: The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in

accordance with ASC 718, “Stock Compensation.” The Company uses a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing
model to estimate the grant-date fair value of the stock options awarded. The Black-Scholes-Merton model
requires assumptions regarding the expected volatility of the Company’s common shares, the risk-free interest
rate, the expected life of the stock options award and the Company’s dividend yield. The Company utilizes
historical data in determining these assumptions. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events
outside of management’s control could have an impact on the Black-Scholes-Merton model.

Income Taxes: The Company estimates income taxes in each jurisdiction in which it operates. This involves

estimating taxable earnings, specific taxable and deductible items, the likelihood of generating sufficient future
taxable income to utilize deferred tax assets and possible exposures related to future tax audits. To the extent
these estimates change, adjustments to deferred and accrued income taxes are made in the period in which the
changes occur. Historically, such adjustments have not been significant.

33

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating data of the Company, including

presentation of the amounts as a percentage of net sales (amounts in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2017 % of
Sales

2016

2016 % of
Sales

2015

2015 % of
Sales

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,504,286
1,519,659
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
415,575
Selling and administrative expenses . .
89,226
Amortization of intangible assets . . . .

100.0% $3,171,411
1,443,348
43.4
382,858
11.9
77,445
2.5

100.0% $2,707,115
1,257,270
45.5
321,624
12.1
54,219
2.4

100.0%
46.4
11.9
2.0

Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net
Refinancing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing operations . . .
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,479,826
602,589
39,807
208,889

628,541

42.2
17.2
1.1
6.0

17.9

1,267,760
483,850
15,794
181,702

586,414

40.0
15.3
0.5
5.7

18.5

1,074,002
418,785
18,393
189,612

447,212

39.7
15.5
0.7
7.0

16.5

(31,654)

(0.9)

—

—

—

—

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 596,887

17.0% $ 586,414

18.5% $ 447,212

16.5%

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2016

Total Company

Net Sales. Net organic sales and acquisition sales and the related dollar and percentage changes for the fiscal

years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Organic sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

Change

$3,248.6
255.7

$3,504.3

$3,171.4
—

$3,171.4

$ 77.2
255.7

$332.9

% Change
Total Sales

2.4%
8.1%

10.5%

Acquisition sales represent sales of acquired businesses for the period up to one year subsequent to their

acquisition date. The amount of acquisition sales shown in the table above was attributable to the Third Quarter
2017 Acquisitions in fiscal year 2017 and the acquisitions of Y&F/Tactair, DDC and Breeze-Eastern in fiscal
year 2016.

The increase in organic sales was primarily driven by commercial aftermarket organic sales increasing by

$34.8 million, or 3.0% and defense organic sales increasing by $41.5 million, or 4.4%. Slightly offsetting the
increases was commercial OEM organic sales decreasing by $2.8 million, or 0.3%.

34

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit. Cost of sales increased by $76.4 million, or 5.3%, to $1,519.7 million for the

fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1,443.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2016. Cost of sales and the related percentage of total sales for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and
2016 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Cost of sales—excluding costs below . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory purchase accounting adjustments . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition integration costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

Change % Change

$1,490.5

$1,405.6

$ 84.9

6.0%

42.5%
20.6

0.6%
4.0
0.1%
4.6
0.1%

44.3%
23.4

0.7%
8.3
0.3%
6.0
0.2%

(2.8)

(12.0)%

(4.3)

(51.8)%

(1.4)

(23.3)%

Total cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,519.7

$1,443.3

$ 76.4

5.3%

% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43.4%

45.5%

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,984.6

$1,728.1

$256.5

14.8%

Gross profit percentage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56.6%

54.5%

The increase in the dollar amount of cost of sales during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 was

primarily due to increased volume associated with the sales from acquisitions and organic sales growth.

Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased by 2.1 percentage points to 56.6% for the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2017 from 54.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The dollar amount of gross profit
increased by $256.5 million, or 14.8%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the comparable
period last year due to the following items:

• Gross profit on the sales from the acquisitions indicated above (excluding acquisition-related costs)
was approximately $153.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, which represented
gross profit of approximately 60% of the acquisition sales. The higher gross profit margin on the
acquisition sales increased gross profit as a percentage of consolidated sales by approximately 1
percentage point.

• Organic sales growth described above, application of our three core value-driven operating strategies
(obtaining profitable new business, continually improving our cost structure, and providing highly
engineered value-added products to customers), and positive leverage on our fixed overhead costs
spread over a higher production volume, resulted in a net increase in gross profit of approximately
$94.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

• Gross profit was also improved by the reduction of the impact of inventory purchase accounting

adjustments, acquisition integration costs and stock compensation expense charged to cost of sales of
approximately $8.5 million.

35

Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $32.7 million to
$415.6 million, or 11.9% of sales, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 from $382.9 million, or 12.1% of
sales, for the comparable period last year. Selling and administrative expenses and the related percentage of total
sales for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

Change % Change

Selling and administrative expenses—excluding costs
below . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$368.1

$314.5

$ 53.6

17.0%

10.5%
41.0

1.2%
6.5
0.2%

9.9%
42.4

1.3%
26.0

0.8%

(1.4)

(3.3)%

(19.5)

(75.0)%

Total selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . .

$415.6

$382.9

$ 32.7

8.5%

% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11.9%

12.1%

The increase in the dollar amount of selling and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 is primarily due to higher selling and administrative expenses relating to recent acquisitions
of approximately $47.7 million, which was approximately 19% of acquisition sales. The increase is partially
offset by lower acquisition-related and stock compensation expenses of $19.5 million and $1.4 million,
respectively.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets increased to $89.2 million for the fiscal

year ended September 30, 2017 from $77.4 million for the comparable period last year. The net increase of
$11.8 million was primarily due to the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions and full year amortization recorded from
the fiscal 2016 acquisitions of Breeze-Eastern, DDC and Y&F/Tactair.

Refinancing Costs. Refinancing costs of $39.8 million were recorded during the year ended September 30,

2017 representing debt issuance costs expensed in connection with the debt financing activity as disclosed in
Note 11, “Debt,” to the consolidated financial statements. Included within the $39.8 million was approximately
$31.9 million in debt issuance costs and premium related to the repurchase of the 2021 Notes. Refinancing costs
of $15.8 million were recorded during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 representing debt issuance costs
expensed in connection with the debt financing activity in June 2016.

Interest Expense-net. Interest expense-net includes interest on borrowings outstanding, amortization of debt
issuance costs, original issue discount and premium, and revolving credit facility fees offset by interest income.
Interest expense-net increased $118.7 million, or 24.5%, to $602.6 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 from $483.9 million for the comparable period last year. The net increase in interest
expense-net was primarily due to an increase in the weighted average level of outstanding borrowings, which was
approximately $10,993 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 and approximately $8,834 million
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The weighted average cash interest rate was consistent at 5.3%
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The increase in weighted average level of
borrowings was due to the issuance of the 2026 Notes for $950 million in June 2016, the incremental term loans
of $950 million in June 2016, the additional net debt financing of $641 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2017,
the additional 2025 Notes offering of $300 million in the second fiscal quarter of 2017, the additional
$100 million drawn on the trade receivable securitization facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and the
additional net debt financing of $575 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The weighted average interest
rate for cash interest payments on total borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2017 was 5.2%.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes was approximately
24.9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to 23.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30,

36

2016. The Company’s effective tax rate for these periods was less than the Federal statutory tax rate due
primarily to excess tax benefits on equity compensation, foreign earnings taxed at rates lower than the U.S.
statutory rates, and the domestic manufacturing deduction. The increase in the effective tax rate for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to
foreign earnings taxed at higher rates versus the prior year foreign earnings.

Loss from Discontinued Operations. Loss from discontinued operations is comprised of the operating loss
from the Schroth operations that were classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2017. The loss includes a
$32 million impairment charge to write-down Schroth’s assets to fair value. More detailed information can be
found in Note 22, “Discontinued Operations.”

Net Income. Net income increased $10.5 million, or 1.8%, to $596.9 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 compared to net income of $586.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2016, primarily
as a result of the factors referred to above.

Earnings per Share. The basic and diluted earnings per share were $7.88 for the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2017 and $10.39 per share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017, basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $8.45 and basic and
diluted loss per share from discontinued operations were $(0.57). Net income for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 of $596.9 million was decreased by dividend equivalent payments of $159.3 million
resulting in net income available to common shareholders of $437.6 million. Net income for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2016 of $586.4 million was decreased by dividend equivalent payments of $3.0 million resulting
in net income available to common shareholders of $583.4 million. The decrease in earnings per share of $2.51
per share to $7.88 per share is a result of the factors referred to above.

Business Segments

Segment Net Sales. Net sales by segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as

follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

% of Sales

2016

% of Sales

Change % Change

Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,948.2
1,442.1
114.0

55.6% $1,621.7
41.2% 1,447.9
101.8
3.2%

51.1% $326.5
(5.8)
45.7%
12.2
3.2%

20.1%
(0.4)%
12.0%

$3,504.3

100.0% $3,171.4

100.0% $332.9

10.5%

Organic sales for the Power & Control segment increased $70.8 million, or an increase of 4.3%, when

compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The organic sales increase resulted from increases in
commercial aftermarket sales ($40.9 million, an increase of 7.5%), defense sales ($28.2 million, an increase of
4.4%), and commercial OEM sales ($1.0 million, an increase of 0.3%). Acquisition sales for the Power &
Control segment totaled $255.7 million, or an increase of 15.8%, resulting from the Third Quarter 2017
Acquisitions and the acquisitions of Y&F/Tactair, DDC and Breeze-Eastern in fiscal year 2016.

Organic sales for the Airframe segment decreased $5.8 million, or a decrease of 0.4%, when compared to

the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The organic sales decrease primarily resulted from decreases in
commercial aftermarket sales ($6.1 million, a decrease of 1.0%), commercial OEM sales ($5.3 million, a
decrease of 1.1%) and non-aerospace sales ($6.9 million, a decrease of 39.4%) offset by an increase in defense
sales ($12.5 million, an increase of 4.2%). There was no impact from acquisitions in the results of the Airframe
segment.

37

Organic sales for the Non-aviation segment increased $12.2 million, or an increase of 12.0%, when
compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The sales increase was primarily due to an increase in
non-aerospace sales of $9.9 million, an increase of 11.5%. There was no impact from acquisitions in the results
of the Non-aviation segment.

EBITDA As Defined. EBITDA As Defined by segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and

2016 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

% of Segment
Sales

Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 981.0
726.6
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41.5
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,749.1

50.4%
50.4%
36.4%

49.9%

2016

$ 787.4
709.9
28.2

$1,525.5

% of Segment
Sales

Change % Change

48.6%
49.0%
27.7%

48.1%

$193.6
16.7
13.3

$223.6

24.6%
2.4%
47.2%

14.7%

Organic EBITDA As Defined for the Power & Control segment increased approximately $82.7 million for

the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. EBITDA As
Defined from the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions and the acquisitions of Y&F/Tactair, DDC and
Breeze-Eastern in fiscal year 2016 was approximately $110.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2017.

Organic EBITDA As Defined for the Airframe segment increased approximately $16.7 million for the fiscal

year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. There was no impact
from acquisitions in the results of the Airframe segment.

Organic EBITDA As Defined for the Non-aviation segment increased approximately $13.3 million for the

fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. There was no
impact from acquisitions in the results of the Non-aviation segment.

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared with fiscal year ended September 30, 2015

Total Company

Net Sales. Net organic sales and acquisition sales and the related dollar and percentage changes for the fiscal

years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Organic sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2016

September 30, 2015

Change

$2,762.2
409.2

$3,171.4

$2,707.1

—

$2,707.1

$ 55.1
409.2

$464.3

% Change
Total Sales

2.0%
15.1%

17.1%

Acquisition sales represent sales of acquired businesses for the period up to one year subsequent to their
acquisition date. The amount of acquisition sales shown in the table above was attributable to the acquisitions of
Breeze-Eastern and DDC in fiscal year 2016 and and the acquisitions of PneuDraulics, Pexco Aerospace, Adams
Rite Aerospace Gmbh and Telair Cargo Group in fiscal year 2015.

Commercial aftermarket organic sales increased $61.3 million, or 6.1%, commercial OEM organic sales
decreased by $8.8 million, or an increase of 1.1%, and defense organic sales were flat when comparing the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2016 compared to fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.

38

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit. Cost of sales increased by $186.0 million, or 14.8%, to $1,443.3 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1,257.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2015. Cost of sales and the related percentage of total sales for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 and
2015 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2016

September 30, 2015

Change % Change

Cost of sales—excluding acquisition-related costs

below . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory purchase accounting adjustments . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition integration costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,405.6

$1,235.1

$170.5

13.8%

44.3%
23.4

0.7%
8.3
0.3%
6.0
0.2%

45.6%
11.4

0.4%
6.1
0.2%
4.7
0.2%

12.0

105.3%

2.2

1.3

36.1%

27.7%

Total cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,443.3

$1,257.3

$186.0

14.8%

% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45.5%

46.4%

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,728.1

$1,449.8

$278.3

19.2%

Gross profit percentage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54.5%

53.6%

The increase in the dollar amount of cost of sales during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was

primarily due to increased volume associated with the sales from acquisitions and organic sales growth.

Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased by 0.9 percentage points to 54.5% for the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2016 from 53.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The dollar amount of gross profit
increased by $278.3 million, or 19.2%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the comparable
period last year due to the following items:

• Gross profit on the sales from the acquisitions indicated above (excluding acquisition-related costs)
was approximately $171.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which represented
gross profit of approximately 42% of the acquisition sales. The lower gross profit margin on the
acquisition sales reduced gross profit as a percentage of consolidated sales by approximately 2
percentage points.

• Organic sales growth described above, application of our three core value-driven operating strategies
(obtaining profitable new business, continually improving our cost structure, and providing highly
engineered value-added products to customers), and positive leverage on our fixed overhead costs
spread over a higher production volume, resulted in a net increase in gross profit of approximately
$122.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.

•

Slightly offsetting the increases in gross profit was the impact of higher inventory purchase accounting
adjustments acquisition integration costs and stock compensation expense charged to cost of sales of
approximately $15.5 million.

39

Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $61.3 million to
$382.9 million, or 12.1% of sales, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 from $321.6 million, or 11.9% of
sales, for the comparable period last year. Selling and administrative expenses and the related percentage of total
sales for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2016

September 30, 2015

Change % Change

Selling and administrative expenses—excluding costs
below . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$314.5

$276.1

$38.4

13.9%

9.9%

42.4

1.3%

26.0

0.8%

10.2%
26.8

1.0%

18.7

0.7%

15.6

58.2%

7.3

39.0%

Total selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . .

$382.9

$321.6

$61.3

19.1%

% of total sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12.1%

11.9%

The increase in the dollar amount of selling and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2016 is primarily due to higher selling and administrative expenses relating to recent acquisitions
of approximately $44.8 million, which was approximately 11% of acquisition sales, and higher acquisition-
related and stock compensation expenses of $7.3 million and $15.6 million, respectively.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets decreased to $77.4 million for the fiscal

year ended September 30, 2016 from $54.2 million for the comparable period last year. The net increase of
$23.2 million was primarily due to the acquisitions of Breeze-Eastern and DDC in fiscal 2016 and full year
amortization recorded on the acquisitions made in 2015.

Refinancing Costs. Refinancing costs of $15.8 million were recorded during the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2016 representing debt issuance costs expensed in connection with the debt financing activity in
June 2016. Included within the $15.8 million was approximately $1.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs
written off. Refinancing costs of $18.4 million were recorded during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015
representing debt issuance costs expensed in conjunction with the debt financing activity in May 2015. Included
within the $18.4 million was approximately $10.2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs written off.

Interest Expense-net. Interest expense-net includes interest on borrowings outstanding, amortization of debt

issuance costs and revolving credit facility fees offset by interest income. Interest expense-net increased
$65.1 million, or 15.5%, to $483.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 from $418.8 million for
the comparable period last year. The net increase in interest expense-net was primarily due to an increase in the
weighted average level of outstanding borrowings, which was approximately $8,834 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2016 and approximately $7,827 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 in
addition to a slight increase in the weighted average cash interest rate during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2016 of 5.3% compared to the weighted average cash interest rate during the comparable prior period of 5.2%.
The increase in weighted average level of borrowings was primarily due to the issuance of the 2026 Notes for
$950.0 million in June 2016, the additional incremental term loans of $950 million in June 2016, the issuance of
the 2025 Notes for $450 million in May 2015, and the additional incremental term loan of $1.0 billion in May
2015. The weighted average interest rate for cash interest payments on total borrowings outstanding at
September 30, 2016 was 5.2%.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes was approximately
24.9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 compared to 23.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2016. The Company’s effective tax rate for these periods was less than the Federal statutory tax rate due
primarily to excess tax benefits on equity compensation, foreign earning taxed at rates lower than the U.S.

40

statutory rates, and the domestic manufacturing deduction. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2017 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to
excess tax benefits on equity compensation and foreign earning taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rates.

Net Income. Net income increased $139.2 million, or 31.1%, to $586.4 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2016 compared to net income of $447.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, primarily
as a result of the factors referred to above.

Earnings per Share. The basic and diluted earnings per share were $10.39 for the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2016 and $7.84 per share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. Net income for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2016 of $586.4 million was decreased by dividend equivalent payments of
$3.0 million resulting in net income available to common shareholders of $583.4 million. Net income for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 of $447.2 million was decreased by dividend equivalent payments of
$3.4 million resulting in net income available to common shareholders of $443.8 million. The increase in
earnings per share of $2.55 per share to $10.39 per share is a result of the factors referred to above.

Business Segments

Segment Net Sales. Net sales by segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as

follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2016

% of Sales

2015

% of Sales

Change % Change

Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,621.7
1,447.9
101.8

51.1% $1,330.1
45.7% 1,280.7
96.3
3.2%

49.1% $291.6
47.3% 167.2
5.5
3.6%

$3,171.4

100.0% $2,707.1

100.0% $464.3

21.9%
13.1%
5.7%

17.2%

Organic sales for the Power & Control segment decreased approximately $21.2 million, or a decrease of
1.6%, when compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The organic sales decrease resulted primarily
from decrease in commercial OEM sales ($31.4 million, a decrease of 9.3%) and in defense sales ($20.6 million,
a decrease of 4.0%) partially offset by an increase in commercial aftermarket sales ($32.1 million, an increase of
7.1%). Acquisition sales for the Power & Control segment totaled $312.8 million, or an increase of 23.5%,
resulting from the acquisitions of Breeze-Eastern and DDC in fiscal year 2016 and the acquisitions of
PneuDraulics, Telair Europe, Telair US in fiscal year 2015.

Organic sales for the Airframe segment, increased approximately $70.7 million, or an increase of 5.5%
when compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. The organic sales increase primarily resulted from
increases in commercial aftermarket ($23.9 million, an increase of 5.3%), commercial OEM sale ($19.6 million,
an increase of 4.5%) and defense sales ($21.6 million, an increase of 77%). Acquisition sales for the Airframe
segment totaled $96.5 million, or an increase of 7.5%, resulting from the acquisitions of Pexco Aerospace,
Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH and Nordisk Aviation Products in fiscal year 2015.

Sales for the Non-aviation segment increased $5.5 million when compared to the fiscal year ended

September 30, 2015. The sales increase was primarily due to an increase in commercial OEM sales of
approximately $3.0 million. There was no impact from acquisitions in the results of the Non-aviation segment.

41

EBITDA As Defined. EBITDA As Defined by segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 and

2015 were as follows (amounts in millions):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2016

% of Segment
Sales

Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 787.4
709.9
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28.2
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,525.5

48.6%
49.0%
27.7%

48.1%

2015

$ 653.1
585.5
22.4

$1,261.0

% of Segment
Sales

Change % Change

49.1%
45.7%
23.3%

46.6%

$134.3
124.4
5.8

$264.5

20.6%
21.2%
25.9%

21.0%

Organic EBITDA As Defined for the Power & Control segment increased approximately $22.9 million for

the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. EBITDA As
Defined from the acquisitions of Breeze-Eastern and DDC in fiscal year 2016 and the acquisitions of
PneuDraulics, Telair Europe and Telair US in fiscal year 2015 was approximately $111.5 for the year ended
September 30, 2016.

Organic EBITDA As Defined for the Airframe segment increased approximately $76.9 million for the fiscal

year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. EBITDA As Defined
from the fiscal year 2015 acquisitions of Pexco Aerospace, Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH and Nordisk Aviation
Products was approximately $47.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.

EBITDA As Defined for the Non-aviation segment increased approximately $5.8 million for the fiscal year

ended September 30, 2016 compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. There was no impact from
acquisitions in the results of the Non-aviation segment.

Backlog

For information about our backlog, see Item 1.—“Business.”

Foreign Operations

Our direct sales to foreign customers were approximately $1,318.9 million, $1,169.5 million, and
$881.1 million for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sales to foreign customers are subject to
numerous additional risks, including foreign currency fluctuations, the impact of foreign government regulations,
political uncertainties and differences in business practices. There can be no assurance that foreign governments
will not adopt regulations or take other action that would have a direct or indirect adverse impact on the business
or market opportunities of the Company within such governments’ countries. Furthermore, there can be no
assurance that the political, cultural and economic climate outside the United States will be favorable to our
operations and growth strategy.

Inflation

Many of the Company’s raw materials and operating expenses are sensitive to the effects of inflation, which

could result in changing operating costs. The effects of inflation on the Company’s businesses during the fiscal
years 2017, 2016 and 2015 were immaterial.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically maintained a capital structure comprising a mix of equity and debt financing. We vary

our leverage both to optimize our equity return and to pursue acquisitions. We expect to meet our current debt
obligations as they come due through internally generated funds from current levels of operations and/or through
refinancing in the debt markets prior to the maturity dates of our debt.

42

We continually evaluate our debt facilities to assess whether they most efficiently and effectively meet the

current and future needs of our business. The Company evaluates from time to time the appropriateness of its
current leverage, taking into consideration the Company’s debt holders, equity holders, credit ratings, acquisition
opportunities and other factors. The Company’s debt leverage ratio, which is computed as total debt divided by
EBITDA As Defined for the applicable twelve-month period, has varied widely during the Company’s history,
ranging from approximately 3.5 to 7.2. Our debt leverage ratio at September 30, 2017 was approximately 6.9.

If the Company has excess cash, it generally prioritizes allocating the excess cash in the following manner:
(1) capital spending at existing businesses, (2) acquisitions of businesses, (3) payment of a special dividend and/
or repurchases of our common stock and (4) prepayment of indebtedness or repurchase of debt. Whether the
Company undertakes additional common stock repurchases or other aforementioned activities will depend on
prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.
The amounts involved may be material. In addition, the Company may issue additional debt if prevailing market
conditions are favorable to doing so.

The Company’s ability to make scheduled interest payments on, or to refinance, the Company’s

indebtedness, or to fund non-acquisition related capital expenditures and research and development efforts, will
depend on the Company’s ability to generate cash in the future. This is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control.

As a result of the additional debt financing during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, interest
payments will increase going forward in accordance with the terms of the related debt agreements. However, in
connection with the continued application of our three core value-driven operating strategies (obtaining
profitable new business, continually improving our cost structure and providing highly engineered value-added
products to customers), we expect our efforts will continue to generate strong margins and provide more than
sufficient cash from operating activities to meet our interest obligations and liquidity needs. We believe our cash
from operations and available borrowing capacity will enable us to make opportunistic investments in our own
stock, make strategic business combinations and/or pay dividends to our shareholders.

In the future, the Company may increase its borrowings in connection with acquisitions, if cash flow from
operating activities becomes insufficient to fund current operations or for other short-term cash needs or for stock
repurchases or dividends. Our future leverage will also be impacted by the then current conditions of the credit
markets.

Operating Activities. The Company generated $788.7 million of net cash from operating activities during
fiscal 2017 compared to $683.3 million during fiscal 2016, a net increase of $105.4 million. The net increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in income from continuing operations and items adjusting net income for
non-cash expenses and income of $38.8 million, and favorable changes in trade accounts receivable, inventories,
and accounts payable of $28.9 million, net.

The change in trade accounts receivable during fiscal 2017 was a use of $54.7 million in cash compared to a

use of cash of $80.1 million in fiscal 2016, which is a reduction to the use of cash of $25.4 million year over
year. The lower use of cash in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 is attributable to the timing of sales and
collections on trade accounts receivable.

The change in inventories was a source of cash of $5.1 million in fiscal 2017 compared to a use of cash of

$2.1 million in fiscal 2016, which is attributable to increased monitoring of inventory management.

The change in accounts payable during fiscal 2017 was a use of cash of $10.4 million compared to a use of

cash of $6.7 million in fiscal 2016. The increase in the use of cash was primarily attributable the timing of
payments to vendors.

43

The Company generated $683.3 million of net cash from operating activities during fiscal 2016 compared to
$520.9 million during fiscal 2015. The net increase of $162.4 million was due primarily to an increase in income
from continuing operations.

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $287.0 million during fiscal 2017 primarily

consisting of capital expenditures of $71.0 million, cash paid in connection with the Third Quarter 2017
Acquisitions of $106.3 million, the Schroth acquisition of $79.7 million and the cash settlement of the
Breeze-Eastern dissenting shares litigation of $28.7 million. The Company expects its capital expenditures in
fiscal year 2018 to be between $85 million and $95 million. The Company’s capital expenditures incurred from
year to year are primarily for projects that are consistent with our three core value-driven operating strategies
(obtaining profitable new business, continually improve our cost structure and providing highly engineered
value-added products to customers).

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,443.0 million during fiscal 2016 consisting primarily of the
acquisitions of Breeze-Eastern, DDC and Y&F/Tactair for a total of $1,399.1 million and capital expenditures of
$44.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,679.1 million during fiscal 2015 consisting primarily of the
acquisitions of Telair Cargo Group, Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH, Pexco Aerospace and PneuDraulics for a
total of $1,624.3 million and capital expenditures of $54.9 million.

Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017
was $1,443.7 million. The use of cash was primarily related to the aggregate payment of $2,581.6 million for a
$24.00 per share special dividend declared and paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and a $22.00 per share
special dividend declared and paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and dividend equivalent payments. Also
contributing to the use of cash was $1,284.7 million in debt service payments on the existing term loans and the
remaining principal on the Tranche C Term Loans, redemption and related premium paid on the 2021 Notes
aggregating to $528.8 million and $389.8 million related to treasury stock purchases under the Company’s share
repurchase program. Slightly offsetting the uses of cash were net proceeds from the 2017 term loans (Tranche F
and Tranche G Term Loans) of $2,937.7 million and the additional 2025 Notes offering of $300.4 million,
$99.5 million in net proceeds from an additional A/R Securitization draw in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and
$21.2 million in proceeds from stock option exercises.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was

$1,632.5 million, which primarily comprised of net proceeds from the 2016 term loans of $1,711.5 million, net
proceeds from our 2026 Notes of $939.6 million, and $30.1 million of cash proceeds from the exercise of stock
options. These increases were partially offset by $834.4 million of repayments on our existing term loans,
$207.8 million in treasury stock purchases under the Company’s share repurchase programs, $3.0 million in
dividend equivalent payments and the impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-09 which resulted in the excess tax
benefits related to share-based payment arrangements being classified within operating activities beginning in
fiscal 2016.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 was

$1,054.9 million, which was comprised of $1,516.0 million in net proceeds under our Tranche E Term Loans,
$445.3 million of net proceeds from our 2025 Notes, and $123.6 million of cash for tax benefits related to share-
based payment arrangements and from the exercise of stock options slightly offset by $1,025.3 million of
repayments on our term loans and $3.4 million in dividend equivalent payments.

Description of Senior Secured Term Loans and Indentures

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into the Assumption Agreement with Credit Suisse AG, as

administrative agent and collateral agent, and as a lender, in connection with the 2016 term loans. The

44

Assumption Agreement, among other things, provided for (i) additional tranche F term loans in an aggregate
principal amount equal to $650 million, which were fully drawn on October 14, 2016, and (ii) additional delayed
draw tranche F term loans in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $500 million, which were fully drawn
on October 27, 2016. The terms and conditions that apply to the additional tranche F term loans and the
additional delayed draw tranche F term loans are substantially the same as the terms and conditions that apply to
the tranche F term loans under the 2016 term loans immediately prior to the Assumption Agreement.

On March 6, 2017, TD Group and certain subsidiaries of TransDigm entered into Amendment No. 2 to the

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”. Refer to Note 11, “Debt,” in the
consolidated financial statements included within this Form 10-K for further information regarding the
authorized dividends and share repurchases and the increase to the general investment basket established by
Amendment No. 2.

On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into Amendment No. 3 and Incremental Term Loan Assumption

Agreement to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 3”). Pursuant to
Amendment No. 3, TransDigm, among other things, incurred the new tranche G term loans (the “Tranche G
Term Loans”) in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $1.8 billion and repaid in full all of the
Tranche C term loans outstanding under the Restated Credit Agreement. The Tranche G Term Loans were fully
drawn on August 22, 2017. The Tranche G Term Loans mature on August 22, 2024. The terms and conditions
(other than maturity date) that apply to the Tranche G Term Loans, including pricing, are substantially the same
as the terms and conditions that applied to the Tranche C term loans immediately prior to Amendment No. 3.
Amendment No. 3 also permitted (a) payment of a special dividend, share repurchase, or combination thereof, in
an aggregate amount up to approximately $1.3 billion within 60 days of the effective date of Amendment No. 3,
and (b) certain additional restricted payments, including the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends
or repurchase stock, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.5 billion within twelve months of the effective date
of Amendment No. 3 provided that, among other conditions, if such additional loans are to be used by the
Company to repurchase shares of its capital stock, the consolidated secured net debt ratio would be no greater
than 4.00 to 1.00 and if such additional terms loans are to be used by TD Group to pay dividends or other
distributions on or in respect of its capital stock, the consolidated net leverage ratio would be no greater than 6.00
to 1.00, in each case, after giving effect to such incremental term loans. If any portion of the $1.5 billion is not
used for dividends or share repurchases over such twelve month period, such amount (not to exceed $500
million) may be used to repurchase stock at any time thereafter.

TransDigm has $6,973.0 million in fully drawn term loans (the “Term Loans Facility”) and a $600 million
revolving credit facility. The Term Loans Facility consists of four tranches of term loans as follows (aggregate
principal amount disclosed is as of September 30, 2017):

Term Loans Facility

Aggregate Principal

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

Tranche D
Tranche E
Tranche F
Tranche G

$798 million
$1,503 million
$2,857 million
$1,815 million

June 4, 2021
May 14, 2022
June 9, 2023
August 22, 2024

LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%

(1) LIBO rate is subject to a floor of 0.75%.

The Term Loans Facility requires quarterly aggregate principal payments of $17.5 million. The revolving
commitments consist of two tranches which include up to $100 million of multicurrency revolving commitments.
At September 30, 2017, the Company had $15.7 million in letters of credit outstanding and $584.3 million in
borrowings available under the revolving commitments.

The interest rates per annum applicable to the loans under the Credit Agreement are, at TransDigm’s option,

equal to either an alternate base rate or an adjusted LIBO rate for one, two, three or six-month (or to the extent

45

agreed to by each relevant lender, nine or twelve-month) interest periods chosen by TransDigm, in each case plus
an applicable margin percentage. The adjusted LIBO rate is subject to a floor of 0.75%. For the fiscal year 2017,
the applicable interest rates ranged from approximately 3.75% to 4.26% on the existing term loans.

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, TransDigm is entitled, on one or more occasions, to request
additional term loans or additional revolving commitments to the extent that the existing or new lenders agree to
provide such incremental term loans or additional revolving commitments provided that, among other conditions,
our consolidated net leverage ratio would be no greater than 7.25 to 1.00 and the consolidated secured net debt
ratio would be no greater than 4.25 to 1.00, in each case, after giving effect to such incremental term loans or
additional revolving commitments

The Credit Agreement requires mandatory prepayments of principal based on certain percentages of Excess
Cash Flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement), commencing 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, subject to
certain exceptions. In addition, subject to certain exceptions (including, with respect to asset sales, the
reinvestment in productive assets), TransDigm will be required to prepay the loans outstanding under the Credit
Agreement at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the net cash proceeds
of certain asset sales and issuance or incurrence of certain indebtedness. No matters mandating prepayments
occurred during the year ended September 30, 2017.

Interest rate swaps and caps used to hedge and offset, respectively, the variable interest rates on the credit
facility are described in Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities” to the consolidated financial statements
included herein.

Indentures

Senior Subordinated Notes

Aggregate Principal

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

2020 Notes
2022 Notes
2024 Notes
2025 Notes
2026 Notes

$550 million
$1,150 million
$1,200 million
$750 million
$950 million

October 15, 2020
July 15, 2022
July 15, 2024
May 15, 2025
June 15, 2026

5.50%
6.00%
6.50%
6.50%
6.375%

The 2020 Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2024 Notes, and the 2026 Notes (the “Notes”) were issued at an issue
price of 100% of the principal amount. The initial $450 million offering of the 2025 Notes (also considered to be
part of the “Notes”) were issued at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount and the subsequent
$300 million offering in the quarter ended April 1, 2017 of 2025 Notes (further described below) were issued at
an issue price of 101.5% of the principal amount.

Such Notes do not require principal payments prior to their maturity. Interest under the Notes is payable
semi-annually. The Notes represent unsecured obligations of TransDigm Inc. ranking subordinate to TransDigm
Inc.’s senior debt, as defined in the applicable Indentures.

The Notes are subordinated to all of TransDigm’s existing and future senior debt, rank equally with all of its
existing and future senior subordinated debt and rank senior to all of its future debt that is expressly subordinated
to the Notes. The Notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by TD Group and its wholly-
owned domestic subsidiaries named in the indentures. The guarantees of the Notes are subordinated to all of the
guarantors’ existing and future senior debt, rank equally with all of their existing and future senior subordinated
debt and rank senior to all of their future debt that is expressly subordinated to the guarantees of the Notes. The
Notes are structurally subordinated to all of the liabilities of TD Group’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. The Notes
contain many of the restrictive covenants included in the Credit Agreement. TransDigm is in compliance with all
the covenants contained in the Notes.

46

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company offered to purchase in a cash tender offer all of its
previously outstanding 2021 Notes with a portion of the proceeds received from the Incremental Term Loan
Assumption Agreement.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company issued $300 million in aggregate principal of its
2025 Notes at a premium of 1.5%, resulting in gross proceeds of $304.5 million. The new notes offered were an
additional issuance of our existing 2025 Notes and were issued under the same indenture as the original issuance
of the $450 million of 2025 Notes. With these additional Notes, there is a total of $750 million in aggregate
principal amount of 2025 Notes.

Certain Restrictive Covenants in Our Debt Documents

The Credit Agreement and the Indentures governing the Notes contain restrictive covenants that, among

other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the payment of dividends, transactions with
affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances, and prepayments of
certain other indebtedness.

Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, prior to Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 as described below,

and subject to certain conditions, TransDigm was permitted to make certain additional restricted payments,
including to declare or pay dividends or repurchase stock, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,500 million
on or prior to December 31, 2016. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the aggregate amount of restricted
payments remaining, not to exceed $500 million, were permissible solely to the extent that the proceeds were
used to repurchase stock. The total restricted payments, as described above, made prior to December 31, 2016
totaled $1,326 million (all related to the special dividend payment and dividend equivalent payments). The
remaining $50 million in dividend equivalent payments made in the quarter ended December 31, 2016 were
applied against allowable restricted payments that carried over from previous years under our Credit Agreement.
During January 2017, $150 million in stock repurchases were made (up to $174 million in stock repurchases
were allowable) under this agreement.

On March 6, 2017, TD Group and certain subsidiaries of TransDigm entered into Amendment No. 2.
Amendment No. 2 permitted, among other things, up to $1.5 billion of dividends and share repurchases on or
prior to March 6, 2018. If any portion of the $1.5 billion was not used for dividends or share repurchases by
March 6, 2018, such amount (not to exceed $500 million) may be used to repurchase stock at any time thereafter.

On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into Amendment No. 3. Pursuant to Amendment No. 3,

TransDigm, among other things, incurred the Tranche G Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount equal to
approximately $1.8 billion and repaid in full all of the Tranche C term loans outstanding under the Credit
Agreement. The Tranche G Term Loans were fully drawn on August 22, 2017. The Tranche G Term Loans
mature on August 22, 2024. The terms and conditions (other than maturity date) that applied to the Tranche G
Term Loans, including pricing, are substantially the same as the terms and conditions that apply to the Tranche C
term loans immediately prior to Amendment No. 3. Amendment No. 3 also permitted (a) payment of a special
dividend, share repurchase, or combination thereof, in an aggregate amount up to approximately $1.3 billion
within 60 days of the effective date of Amendment No. 3, and (b) certain additional restricted payments,
including the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends or repurchase stock, in an aggregate amount not
to exceed $1.5 billion within twelve months of the effective date of Amendment No. 3. If any portion of such
$1.5 billion is not used for dividends or share repurchases over such twelve month period, such amount (not to
exceed $500 million) may be used to repurchase stock at any time thereafter.

In addition, under the Credit Agreement, if the usage of the revolving credit facility exceeds 25% of the total
revolving commitments, the Company will be required to maintain a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio of
net debt, as defined, to trailing four-quarter EBITDA As Defined. A breach of any of the covenants or an
inability to comply with the required leverage ratio could result in a default under the Credit Agreement or the
Indentures.

47

If any such default occurs, the lenders under the Credit Agreement and the holders of the Notes may elect to

declare all outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest and other amounts payable thereunder, to be
immediately due and payable. The lenders under the Credit Agreement also have the right in these circumstances
to terminate any commitments they have to provide further borrowings. In addition, following an event of default
under the Credit Agreement, the lenders thereunder will have the right to proceed against the collateral granted to
them to secure the debt, which includes our available cash, and they will also have the right to prevent us from
making debt service payments on the Notes.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.

Trade Receivables Securitization

For information about our trade receivables securitization, see Note 11, “Debt,” to our consolidated

financial statements included herein.

Stock Repurchase Program

For information about our stock repurchase programs, see Note 15, “Capital Stock,” to our consolidated

financial statements included herein.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of contractual cash obligations as of September 30, 2017 (in millions):

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023 and
thereafter

Senior Secured Term Loans(1) . . . . . . $
2020 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securitization Facility . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
Scheduled Interest Payments(2)
Operating Leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70.0
—
—
—
—
—
300.0
628.1
18.0
249.0

$ 70.0 $ 70.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
632.7
14.6
26.2

—
—
—
—
—
—
631.4
17.5
41.6

Total Contractual Cash

$ 835.2
550.0

$1,491.8
—
— 1,150.0
—
—
—
—
594.0
12.6
33.6

$4,435.9
—
—
— 1,200.0
750.0
—
950.0
—
—
—
762.7
519.9
33.6
11.5
—
17.1

Total

$ 6,973.0
550.0
1,150.0
1,200.0
750.0
950.0
300.0
3,768.8
107.8
367.5

Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,265.1 $760.5 $743.5 $2,025.4

$3,190.3

$8,132.2

$16,117.1

(1) The Tranche D Term Loans mature in June 2021, the Tranche E Term Loans mature in May 2022, the

Tranche F Term Loans mature in June 2023, and the Tranche G Term Loans mature in August 2024. The
term loans require quarterly principal payments totaling $17.5 million.

(2) Assumes that the variable interest rate on our Tranche D, Tranche E, Tranche F and Tranche G borrowings
under our Senior Secured Term Loans range from approximately 4.37% to 4.92% based on anticipated
movements in the LIBO rate. In addition, interest payments include the impact of the existing interest rate
swap and cap agreements described in Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities” to the consolidated
financial statements herein.

In addition to the contractual obligations set forth above, the Company incurs capital expenditures for the

purpose of maintaining and replacing existing equipment and facilities and, from time to time, for facility
expansion. Capital expenditures totaled approximately $71.0 million, $44.0 million, and $54.9 million during
fiscal years 2017, 2016, and fiscal 2015, respectively. The Company expects its capital expenditures in fiscal
year 2018 to be between $85 million and $95 million.

48

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company utilizes letters of credit to back certain payment and performance obligations. Letters of

credit are subject to limits based on amounts outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

New Accounting Standards

For information about new accounting standards, see Note 4, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” to our

consolidated financial statements included herein.

Additional Disclosure Required by Indentures

Separate financial statements of TransDigm Inc. are not presented since TD Group has no operations or
significant assets separate from its investment in TransDigm Inc. and since the Notes are guaranteed by TD
Group and all direct and indirect domestic restricted subsidiaries of TransDigm Inc. TransDigm Inc.’s immaterial
wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are not obligated to guarantee the Notes.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates. Our financial instruments that are subject to
interest rate risk principally include fixed-rate and floating-rate long-term debt. At September 30, 2017, we had
borrowings under our term loans of approximately $6,973 million that were subject to interest rate risk.
Borrowings under our term loans bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either an alternate base rate or an
adjusted LIBOR for a one-, two-, three- or six-month (or to the extent available to each lender, nine- or twelve-
month) interest period chosen by us, in each case, plus an applicable margin percentage. Accordingly, the
Company’s cash flows and earnings will be exposed to the market risk of interest rate changes resulting from
variable rate borrowings under our term loans. The effect of a hypothetical one percentage point increase in
interest rates would increase the annual interest costs under our term loans by approximately $67 million based
on the amount of outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2017. The weighted average interest rate on the
$6,973 million of borrowings under our term loans on September 30, 2017 was 4.5%.

Interest rate swaps and caps used to hedge and offset, respectively, the variable interest rates on the credit

facility are described in Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” to our consolidated financial statements
included herein. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

For information about the fair value of the aggregate principal amount of borrowings under our term loans

and the fair value of the Notes, see Note 19, “Fair Value Measurements,” to our consolidated financial statements
included herein.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this Item is contained on pages F-1 through F-46 of this Report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

49

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2017, TD Group carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of TD Group’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of TD
Group’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that TD Group’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by TD Group in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to TD Group’s
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, TD
Group’s management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated,
can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily
was required to apply its judgment in designing and evaluating the controls and procedures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of TD Group is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over

financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Using criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO) in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework, TransDigm’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017. Based on our assessment, management concluded that the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2017.

During fiscal 2017, we completed the acquisitions of Schroth and the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions. The

results of operations are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. As
permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to exclude Schroth and the Third Quarter
2017 Acquisitions from our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2017. Total assets as of September 30, 2017 and revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2017 for these fiscal 2017 acquisitions constituted 2% and 1%, respectively, of each of these key measures as
reported in our consolidated financial statements.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017 has
been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report,
which is included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during

the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

50

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
TransDigm Group Incorporated

We have audited TransDigm Group Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria).
TransDigm Group Incorporated’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in
the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies
and procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,
management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of Schroth and the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions, which are included in the
2017 consolidated financial statements of TransDigm Group Incorporated and constituted 2% of total assets as of
September 30, 2017 and 1% of revenues for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting of TransDigm Group Incorporated also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over
financial reporting of Schroth or the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions.

In our opinion, TransDigm Group Incorporated maintained, in all material respects, effective internal

control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of TransDigm Group Incorporated as of September 30, 2017 and
2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ deficit
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017 of TransDigm Group
Incorporated and our report dated November 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Cleveland, Ohio
November 13, 2017

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

51

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Information regarding TD Group’s directors will be set forth under the caption “Proposal One: Election of

Directors” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. The following table sets forth
certain information concerning TD Group’s executive officers:

Name

W. Nicholas Howley

Robert S. Henderson
Kevin Stein
Terrance M. Paradie

Bernt G. Iversen II

James Skulina
Peter Palmer
Jorge Valladares III
Roger V. Jones
Joel Reiss

Age

65

61
51
49

60

58
53
43
57
47

Position

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
Vice Chairman
President and Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Executive Vice President—Mergers &
Acquisitions and Business Development
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President

Mr. Howley was named Chairman of the Board of Directors of TD Group in July 2003. He has served as

Chief Executive Officer of TD Group since December 2005 and of TransDigm Inc. since December 2001.
Mr. Howley served as President of TD Group from July 2003 through December 2015, as Chief Operating
Officer of TransDigm Inc. from December 1998 through December 2001 and as President of TransDigm Inc.
from December 1998 through September 2005. Mr. Howley was a director of Polypore International Inc., a
NYSE-listed manufacturer of polymer-based membranes used in separation and filtration processes through
October 2012. Mr. Howley was a director of Satair A/S, a Danish public company that is an aerospace
distributor, including a distributor of the Company’s products through October 2011.

Mr. Henderson was appointed Vice Chairman in January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Henderson served as Chief

Operating Officer—Airframe from October 2014 to December 2016. Mr. Henderson also previously served as
Executive Vice President from December 2005 to October 2014, and as President of the AdelWiggins Group, a
division of TransDigm Inc., from August 1999 to April 2008.

Mr. Stein was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Stein

served as Chief Operating Officer—Power from October 2014 to December 2016. Prior to joining TransDigm,
Mr. Stein served as Executive Vice President and President of the Structurals division of Precision Castparts
Corp. from November 2011 to October 2014 and Executive Vice President and President of the Fasteners
division of Precision Castparts Corp. from January 2009 through November 2011.

Mr. Paradie was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2015. Prior to
joining TransDigm, Mr. Paradie held various titles at Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., a NYSE-listed international
mining company, including Chief Financial Officer (from October 2012 to April 2015) and Executive Vice
President (from March 2013 to April 2015).

52

Mr. Iversen was appointed Executive Vice President—Mergers & Acquisitions and Business Development
in May 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Iversen served as Executive Vice President of TD Group from December 6, 2010
through May 2012 and as President of Champion Aerospace LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransDigm Inc.,
from June 2006 to December 2010.

Mr. Skulina was appointed Executive Vice President in January 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Skulina served as

President of the Aero Fluid Products division of AeroControlex Group, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
TransDigm Inc., from September 2009 to December 2011, and as Controller of TransDigm Inc., from August
2007 to August 2009.

Mr. Palmer was appointed Executive Vice President in February 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Palmer served as

President of AdelWiggins Group, a division of TransDigm Inc., from April 2010 to February 2012, and as
President of CEF Industries, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransDigm Inc., from June 2008 to March
2010.

Mr. Valladares was appointed Executive Vice President in October 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Valladares

served as President of AvtechTyee, Inc. (formerly Avtech Corporation), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
TransDigm Inc., from August 2009 to September 2013, and as President of AdelWiggins Group, a division of
TransDigm Inc., from April 2008 to July 2009.

Mr. Jones was appointed Executive Vice President in October 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Jones served as
President of AeroControlex, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransDigm Inc., from September 2009 to October
2015.

Mr. Reiss was appointed Executive Vice President in October 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Reiss served as
President of Hartwell Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransDigm Inc., from May 2012 to October
2015, and as President of Skurka Aerospace, also a wholly-owned subsidiary of TransDigm Inc., from July 2010
to May 2012.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be set

forth under the caption entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy
Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers, and

employees and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers which includes additional ethical obligations for
our senior financial management (which includes our chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer,
division presidents, controllers, treasurer, and chief internal auditor). Please refer to the information set forth
under the caption “Corporate Governance—Codes of Ethics & Whistleblower Policy” in our Proxy Statement,
which is incorporated herein by reference. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Code of Ethics for
Senior Financial Officers is available on our website at www.transdigm.com. Any person may receive a copy
without charge by writing to us at TransDigm Group Incorporated, 1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3000, Cleveland,
Ohio 44114. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to directors and executive officers and that is required to be disclosed
pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Nominations of Directors

The procedure by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors will be set forth

under the caption “Corporate Governance-Board Committees—Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

53

Audit Committee

The information regarding the audit committee of our Board of Directors and audit committee financial
experts will be set forth under the caption “Corporate Governance-Board Committees—Audit Committee” in our
Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation”,

“Compensation of Directors”, “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and
“Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND

RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be set forth
under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement,
which is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category

Equity compensation plans approved by

Number of Securities
to Be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)

security holders(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,726,002(2)

$154.58

4,137,011(3)

(1)

Includes information related to the 2003 stock option plan, the 2006 stock incentive plan and the 2014 stock
option plan.

(2) This amount represents 77,829, 4,786,114 and 862,059 shares subject to outstanding stock options under our
2003 stock option plan, 2006 stock incentive plan and 2014 stock option plan, respectively. No further
grants may be made under our 2003 stock option plan and 2006 stock incentive plan, although outstanding
stock options continue in force in accordance with their terms.

(3) This amount represents remaining shares available for award under our 2014 stock option plan.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be set forth under the captions entitled “Certain Relationships and

Related Transactions,” “Compensation of Directors,” and “Independence of Directors” in our Proxy Statement,
which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be set forth under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and

Services” in our Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

54

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents Filed with Report

(a) (1) Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017, 2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016

and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

F-1

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017,

2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pages F-7 to F-45

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016

and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-46

55

(a) (3) Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

2.1

2.2

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

Purchase Agreement, dated February 20, 2015,
among AAR International, Inc., AAR
Manufacturing, Inc., TransDigm Inc. and
TransDigm Germany GmbH

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
May 23, 2016 among TransDigm Inc., Thunder
Merger Sub Inc., ILC Holdings, Inc. and
Behrman Capital PEP L.P.

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed February 24,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 26, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, filed April 28, 2014, of
TransDigm Group Incorporated

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
TransDigm Group Incorporated

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed July 2, 1993,
of NovaDigm Acquisition, Inc. (now known as
TransDigm Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Certificate of Amendment, filed July 22, 1993,
of the Certificate of Incorporation of
NovaDigm Acquisition, Inc. (now known as
TransDigm Inc.)

Bylaws of NovaDigm Acquisition, Inc. (now
known as TransDigm Inc.)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed July 10, 2009,
of Acme Aerospace Inc.

3.7

Bylaws of Acme Aerospace Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2009
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2009
(File No. 001-32833)

3.8

3.9

3.10

Articles of Incorporation, filed July 30, 1986, of
ARP Acquisition Corporation (now known as
Adams Rite Aerospace, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Certificate of Amendment, filed September 12,
1986, of the Articles of Incorporation of ARP
Acquisition Corporation (now known as Adams
Rite Aerospace, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment, filed January 27,
1992, of the Articles of Incorporation of Adams
Rite Products, Inc. (now known as Adams Rite
Aerospace, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

56

Exhibit No.

Description

3.11

3.12

3.13

3.14

Certificate of Amendment, filed December 31,
1992, of the Articles of Incorporation of Adams
Rite Products, Inc. (now known as Adams Rite
Aerospace, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment, filed August 11,
1997, of the Articles of Incorporation of Adams
Rite Sabre International, Inc. (now known as
Adams Rite Aerospace, Inc.)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Adams Rite
Aerospace, Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, filed June 18,
2007, of AeroControlex Group, Inc.

3.15

Bylaws of AeroControlex Group, Inc.

3.16

3.17

3.18

Certificate of Formation, filed September 25,
2013, of Aerosonic LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Aerosonic LLC

Certificate of Incorporation, filed November 13,
2009, of Airborne Acquisition, Inc.

3.19

Bylaws of Airborne Acquisition, Inc.

3.20

3.21

3.22

3.23

Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, filed January 25, 2010, of HDT
International Holdings, Inc. (now known as
Airborne Global, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed February 24, 2010, of HDT
International Holdings, Inc. (now known as
Airborne Global, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed December 10, 2013, of
HDT International Holdings, Inc. (now known
as Airborne Global, Inc.)

Bylaws of HDT International Holdings, Inc.
(now known as Airborne Global, Inc.)

57

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

3.24

Certificate of Incorporation, filed November 13,
2009, of Airborne Holdings, Inc.

3.25

Bylaws of Airborne Holdings, Inc.

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

3.26

3.27

3.28

3.29

3.30

3.31

3.32

3.33

3.34

3.35

3.36

Certificate of Incorporation, filed September 1,
1995, of Wardle Storeys Inc. (now known as
Airborne Systems NA Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed May 28, 2002, of Wardle
Storeys Inc. (now known as Airborne Systems
NA Inc.)

Bylaws of Airborne Systems NA Inc., as
amended

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 23,
2007, of Airborne Systems North America Inc.

Bylaws of Airborne Systems North America
Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 25,
1989, of Irvin Industries (Del), Inc. (now
known as Airborne Systems North America of
CA Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed June 2, 1989, of Irvin
Industries (Del), Inc. (now known as Airborne
Systems North America of CA Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed April 30, 1996, of Irvin
Industries, Inc. (now known as Airborne
Systems North America of CA Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed April 23, 1997, of Irvin
Aerospace Inc. (now known as Airborne
Systems North America of CA Inc.)

Bylaws of Airborne Systems North America of
CA Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, Profit, filed
October 28, 1994, of Wardle Storeys
(Parachutes) Inc. (now known as Airborne
Systems North America of NJ Inc.)

58

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

3.37

3.38

3.39

3.40

3.41

3.42

3.43

3.44

3.45

3.46

3.47

3.48

Exhibit No.

Description

Certificate of Merger, filed February 9, 1995, of
Para-Flite Inc. with and into Wardle Storeys
(Parachutes) Inc. (now known as Airborne
Systems North America of NJ Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed April 23, 1997, of Para-
Flite Inc. (now known as Airborne Systems
North America of NJ Inc.)

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Correction to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed June 27, 2007, of Airborne
Systems North America of NJ Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Bylaws of Airborne Systems North America of
NJ Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, filed May 8, 1985,
of Am-Safe, Inc. (now known as AmSafe, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to Form TransDigm
Group Incorporated’s 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed May 19, 2005, of Am-Safe,
Inc. (now known as AmSafe, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

By-Laws of Am-Safe, Inc. (now known as
AmSafe, Inc.)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed October 16,
2007, of AmSafe Global Holdings, Inc.

Amended and Restated By-Laws of AmSafe
Global Holdings, Inc.

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed
July 10, 1967, of Arkwin Industries, Inc.

Certificate of Amendment, filed November 4,
1981, of Arkwin Industries, Inc.

Certificate of Amendment, filed June 11, 1999,
of Arkwin Industries, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

3.49

Bylaws of Arkwin Industries, Inc.

59

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

3.50

3.51

3.52

3.53

3.54

3.55

3.56

Certificate of Incorporation, filed March 7,
2003, of Wings Holdings, Inc. (now known as
Aviation Technologies, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed May 12, 2003, of Wings
Holdings, Inc. (now known as Aviation
Technologies, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed July 17, 2003, of Wings
Holdings, Inc. (now known as Aviation
Technologies, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Bylaws of Wings Holdings, Inc. (now known as
Aviation Technologies, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Certificate of Formation, filed June 28, 2007, of
Avionic Instruments LLC

Filed Herewith

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Avionic Instruments LLC

Certificate of Incorporation, filed December 29,
1992, of Avionic Specialties, Inc.

3.57

Bylaws of Avionic Specialties, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No.333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

3.58

3.59

3.60

3.61

3.62

3.63

Articles of Incorporation, filed October 3, 1963,
of Avtech Corporation (now known as
AvtechTyee, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation, filed March 30, 1984, of Avtech
Corporation (now known as AvtechTyee, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation, filed April 17, 1989, of Avtech
Corporation (now known as AvtechTyee, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation, filed July 17, 1998, of Avtech
Corporation (now known as AvtechTyee, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation, filed May 20, 2003, of Avtech
Corporation (now known as Avtech Tyee, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s
Form S-4, filed July 6, 2007
(File No. 333-144366)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of
Incorporation, filed May 2, 2012, of
AvtechTyee, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 16,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

60

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

3.64

3.65

3.66

3.67

3.68

3.69

Bylaws of Avtech Corporation (now known as
AvtechTyee, Inc.)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed October 24,
1977, of Transformer Technology Corporation
(now known as Beta Transformer Technology
Corporation)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed December 1, 1977, of
Transformer Technology Corporation (now
known as Beta Transformer Technology
Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Bylaws of Transformer Technology
Corporation (now known as Beta Transformer
Technology Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Formation, filed May 30, 2013, of
Beta Transformer Technology LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Amended and Restated Limited Liability
Company Agreement, filed July 7, 2016, of
Beta Transformer Technology LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

3.70

Certificate of Formation of Breeze-Eastern LLC Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group

3.71

3.72

3.73

3.74

3.75

3.76

3.77

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Breeze-Eastern LLC

Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Articles of Incorporation, filed February 6,
1998, of Air Carrier Acquisition Corp. (now
known as Bridport-Air Carrier, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Articles of Amendment, filed February 23,
1998, of Air Carrier Acquisition Corp. (now
known as Bridport-Air Carrier, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Articles of Amendment, filed December 14,
1999, of Bridport-Air Carrier, Inc.

Amended and Restated By-Laws of
Bridport-Air Carrier, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed May 9, 2000,
of Erie Acquisition Corp. (now known as
Bridport Erie Aviation, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed May 30, 2000, of Erie
Acquisition Corp. (now known as Bridport Erie
Aviation, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

61

3.78

3.79

3.80

3.81

3.82

3.86

3.87

3.88

3.89

3.90

3.91

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed June 19, 2000, of Bridport
Erie Aviation, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Erie
Acquisition Corp. (now known as Bridport Erie
Aviation, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed July 2, 2004,
of Bridport Holdings, Inc.

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Bridport
Holdings, Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation filed August 6,
2007, of Bruce Aerospace, Inc.

3.83

Bylaws of Bruce Aerospace, Inc.

3.84

Certificate of Conversion, effective June 30,
2007, converting CDA InterCorp into CDA
InterCorp LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

3.85

Operating Agreement of CDA InterCorp LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 21,
2007 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 21,
2007 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 24,
2009 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 24,
2009 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Certificate of Formation, filed September 30,
2010, of CEF Industries, LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of CEF
Industries, LLC

Certificate of Formation, effective June 30,
2007, of Champion Aerospace LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Champion Aerospace LLC

Certificate of Incorporation, filed October 23,
1970, of ILC Data Devices Corporation (now
known as Data Device Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed April 23, 1999, of ILC Data
Devices Corporation (now known as Data
Device Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

62

3.92

3.93

3.94

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed July 14, 2014, of Data
Device Corporation

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Bylaws of ILC Data Devices Corporation (now
known as Data Device Corporation)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed November 20,
2009, of Dukes Aerospace, Inc.

3.95

Bylaws of Dukes Aerospace, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed December 4,
2009 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed December 4,
2009 (File No. 001-32833)

3.96

3.97

3.98

3.99

3.100

3.101

3.102

3.103

3.104

Certificate of Formation, filed February 29,
2000, of Western Sky Industries, LLC (now
known as Electromech Technologies LLC)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed December 18,
2013, of Western Sky Industries, LLC (now
known as Electromech Technologies LLC)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014

Second Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Agreement of Western Sky Industries,
LLC (now known as Electromech Technologies
LLC)

Certificate of Conversion, effective March 31,
2014, of Harco LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Harco LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed August 7, 2014 (File No. 333-197935)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed August 7, 2014 (File No. 333-197935)

Articles of Incorporation, filed May 10, 1957,
of Hartwell Aviation Supply Company (now
known as Hartwell Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed June 9, 1960,
of Articles of Incorporation of Hartwell
Aviation Supply Company (now known as
Hartwell Corporation)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certification of Amendment, filed October 23,
1987, of Articles of Incorporation of Hartwell
Corporation

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed April 9, 1997,
of Articles of Incorporation of Hartwell
Corporation

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

3.105

Bylaws of Hartwell Corporation

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

63

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

3.106

Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, filed June 23, 2016, of ILC
Holdings, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

3.107

Bylaws of ILC Holdings, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

3.108

3.109

3.110

3.111

3.112

3.113

3.114

3.115

3.116

3.117

3.118

Certificate of Formation, filed August 12, 2008,
of New ILC Mergeco, LLC (now known as ILC
Industries, LLC)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Formation, filed December 3, 2010, of New
ILC Mergeco, LLC (now known as ILC
Industries, LLC)

Limited Liability Company Agreement of ILC
Industries, LLC

Certificate of Formation, filed January 26,
2007, of Johnson Liverpool LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Amended and Restated Limited Liability
Company Agreement of Johnson Liverpool
LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed March 28,
1994, of MPT Acquisition Corp. (now known
as MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 18, 1994,
of the Certificate of Incorporation of MPT
Acquisition Corp. (now known as
MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 24, 1994,
of the Certificate of Incorporation of MPT
Acquisition Corp. (now known as
MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment, filed August 28,
2003, of the Certificate of Incorporation of
Marathon Power Technology Company (now
known as MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc.)

Bylaws of MPT Acquisition Corp. (now known
as MarathonNorco Aerospace, Inc.)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 13,
2007, of McKechnie Aerospace DE, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 28,
2006 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Holding Company’s Form S-4
filed January 29, 1999 (File No. 333-71397)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

3.119

Bylaws of McKechnie Aerospace DE, Inc.

64

Exhibit No.

Description

3.120

3.121

3.122

3.123

3.124

3.125

3.126

3.127

3.128

3.129

3.131

3.132

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 25,
2007, of McKechnie Aerospace Holdings, Inc.

Bylaws of McKechnie Aerospace Holdings,
Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, filed December 11,
1998, of McKechnie US Holdings Inc. (now
known as McKechnie Aerospace Investments,
Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 11, 2007,
to the Certificate of Incorporation of
McKechnie Investments, Inc. (now known as
McKechnie Aerospace Investments, Inc.)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of McKechnie
Aerospace Investments, Inc.

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Formation, filed May 11, 2005, of
Melrose US 3 LLC (now known as McKechnie
Aerospace US LLC)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 11, 2007,
to Certificate of Formation of Melrose US 3
LLC (now known as McKechnie Aerospace US
LLC)

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
McKechnie Aerospace US LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 28,
2015, of PX Acquisition Co. (now known as
Pexco Aerospace, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 14, 2015,
of Certificate of Incorporation of PX
Acquisition Co. (now known as Pexco
Aerospace, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

3.130

Bylaws of Pexco Aerospace, Inc.

Articles of Incorporation, filed October 3, 1956,
of Pneudraulics, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment, filed December 9,
1970, of Articles of Incorporation of
Pneudraulics, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

3.133

Restated Bylaws of Pneudraulics, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

65

3.134

3.135

3.136

3.137

3.138

3.139

3.140

3.141

3.142

3.143

Exhibit No.

Description

Certificate of Formation, filed May 30, 2007, of
Schneller LLC

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Amended and Restated Limited Liability
Company Agreement, dated August 31, 2011,
of Schneller LLC

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation of Semco
Instruments, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed September 7,
2010 (File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed October 17, 2012, of Semco
Instruments, Inc.

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 16,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Semco
Instruments, Inc.

Certificate of Incorporation, filed
September 16, 1994, of Am-Safe Commercial
Products, Inc. (now known as Shield Restraint
Systems, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed May 19, 2005, of AmSafe
Commercial Products, Inc. (now known as
Shield Restraint Systems, Inc.)

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed August 27, 2014 of AmSafe
Commercial Products, Inc. (now known as
Shield Restraint Systems, Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed September 7,
2010 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 14,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

By Laws of Am-Safe Commercial Products,
Inc. (now known as Shield Restraint Systems,
Inc.)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Incorporation, filed December 22,
2004, of Skurka Aerospace Inc.

3.144

Bylaws of Skurka Aerospace Inc.

3.145

3.146

Certificate of Incorporation, filed August 22,
1986, of Tactair Fluid Controls, Inc.

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation of Tactair Fluid Controls, Inc.

3.147

Bylaws of Tactair Fluid Controls, Inc.

66

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed October 11, 2006 (File No. 333-137937)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed October 11, 2006 (File No. 333-137937)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

3.148

3.149

3.150

3.151

3.152

Certificate of Formation, filed March 27, 2015,
of Telair International LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Telair International LLC

Certificate of Formation, filed February 23,
2015, of Telair US LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Telair US LLC

Articles of Incorporation, filed August 6, 1999,
of Texas Rotronics, Inc.

3.153

Bylaws of Texas Rotronics, Inc.

3.154

3.155

3.156

Certificate of Formation, effective June 30,
2007, of Transicoil LLC

Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Transicoil LLC

Certificate of Formation, filed June 13, 2013, of
Whippany Actuation Systems, LLC

3.157

Limited Liability Agreement of Whippany
Actuation Systems, LLC

3.158

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed
November 10, 2016, of Young & Franklin, Inc.

3.159

Bylaws of Young & Franklin, Inc.

3.160

3.161

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed
June 27, 2014, of North Hills Processing Corp.

Bylaws of Porta Systems Corp. (now known as
North Hills Signal Processing Corp.)

67

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Inc.
and TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-4
filed July 6, 2007 (File No. 333-144366)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed June 27, 2013
(File No. 333-186494)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

3.162

3.163

3.164

3.165

3.166

3.167

3.168

Certificate of Incorporation, filed October 12,
1982, of Porta Systems Overseas Corp (now
known as North Hills Signal Processing
Overseas Corp)

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Incorporation, filed October 6, 2010, of Porta
Systems Overseas Corp (now known as North
Hills Signal Processing Overseas Corp)

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Bylaws of Porta Systems Overseas Corp. (now
known as North Hills Signal Processing
Overseas Corp)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Certificate of Formation, filed December 13,
2016, of Wings Acquisition Sub LLC (now
known as Interiors In Flight LLC)

Limited Liability Agreement of Wings
Acquisition Sub LLC (now known as Interiors
in Flight LLC)

Certificate of Formation, filed December 13,
2016, of Wings Acquisition Co LLC (now
known as SCHROTH Safety Products LLC)

Limited Liability Agreement of Wings
Acquisition Co LLC (now known as
SCHROTH Safety Products LLC)

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

4.1

Form of Stock Certificate

4.2

4.3

4.4

Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2012, among
TransDigm Inc., as issuer, TransDigm Group
Incorporated, as a guarantor, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee,
relating to TransDigm Inc.’s 5.5% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2020

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 5, 2013, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 26, 2013, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

68

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-1
filed March 13, 2006 (File No. 333-130483)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 15,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 11, 2013
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed July 1, 2013
(File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
December 19, 2013, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 9, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 12, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
August 28, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 1, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
July 8, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
October 28, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
March 31, 2017, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

69

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

4.13

4.14

4.15

4.16

4.17

4.18

4.19

4.20

Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
May 9, 2017, among TransDigm, Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2014, among
TransDigm Inc., TransDigm Group
Incorporated, the guarantors listed on the
signature pages thereto and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee,
relating to TransDigm Inc.’s 6.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2022

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 9, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 12, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
August 28, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 1, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
July 8, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
October 28, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

70

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

4.21

4.22

4.23

4.24

4.25

4.26

4.27

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
March 31, 2017, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
May 9, 2017, among TransDigm, Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2014, among
TransDigm Inc., TransDigm Group
Incorporated, the guarantors listed on the
signature pages thereto and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee,
relating to TransDigm Inc.’s 6.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2024

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 9, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 12, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
August 28, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 1, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

71

Exhibit No.

Description

4.28

4.29

4.30

4.31

4.32

4.33

4.34

4.35

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
July 8, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
October 28, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
March 31, 2017, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
May 9, 2017, among TransDigm, Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2015, among
TransDigm Inc., TransDigm Group
Incorporated, the guarantors listed on the
signature pages thereto and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee,
relating to TransDigm Inc.’s 6.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2025

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
June 12, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
August 28, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
April 1, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

72

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to 10-Q filed
May 10, 2017 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 19, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

4.36

4.37

4.38

4.39

4.40

4.41

4.42

4.43

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
July 8, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
October 28, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
March 31, 2017, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
May 9, 2017, among TransDigm, Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Indenture, dated as of June 6, 2016, among
TransDigm Inc., Transdigm Group
Incorporated, the guarantors party thereto and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee, relating to TransDigm Inc.’s
6.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2026

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
July 8, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
October 28, 2016, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
March 31, 2017, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

73

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 14, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

4.44

4.45

4.46

4.47

4.48

4.49

4.50

4.51

4.52

4.53

4.54

10.1

10.2

10.3

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
May 9, 2017, among TransDigm, Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the guarantors
listed on the signature pages thereto and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as Trustee

Form of 5.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2020

Form of 6.00% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2022

Form of 6.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2024

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 15,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Form of 6.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2025

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 19, 2015

Form of 6.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2026

Form of Notation of Guarantee of 5.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2020

Form of Notation of Guarantee of 6.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2022

Form of Notation of Guarantee of 6.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2024

Form of Notation of Guarantee of 6.50% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2025

Form of Notation of Guarantee of 6.375%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2026

Fourth Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated December 10, 2015, between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and
W. Nicholas Howley*

Employment Agreement, dated April 27, 2015,
between TransDigm Group Incorporated and
Terrance Paradie

Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and Robert
Henderson*

74

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 14, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 15,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 19, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 14, 2016
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed December 10,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2015

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed December 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

Exhibit No.

Description

Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and Kevin
Stein*

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed December 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Employment Agreement, Dated February 24,
2011, between TransDigm Group Incorporated
and Bernt Iversen*

Incorporated by reference to TramsDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed February 25,
2011 (File No. 001-32833)

Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2012,
between TransDigm Group Incorporated and
James Skulina*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 24, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2012,
between TransDigm Group Incorporated and
Peter Palmer*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 24, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Employment Agreement, dated October 23,
2013, between TransDigm Group Incorporated
and Jorge Valladares*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 29,
2013 (File No. 001-32833)

Form of Employment Agreement, dated
October 2015, between TransDigm Group
Incorporated and each of Joel Reiss and Roger
Jones*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 27,
2015

First Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated April 20, 2012, between TransDigm
Group Incorporated and Bernt Iversen*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 24, 2012
(File No. 001-32833)

Form of Amendment to Employment
Agreement between TransDigm Group
Incorporated and each of Bernt Iversen, Peter
Palmer and James Skulina*

Form of Amendment to Employment
Agreement, dated October 2015, between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and each of
Terrance Paradie, Bernt Iversen, James Skulina,
Peter Palmer and Jorge Valladares*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 25,
2012 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 27,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated November 11, 2016, between TransDigm
Group Incorporated and Bernt Iversen*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Second Amendment to Employment
Agreement, dated November 11, 2016, between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and Terrance
Paradie*

TransDigm Group Incorporated Fourth
Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option
Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed November 15,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed November 7,
2006 (File No. 333-137937)

Amendment No. 1 to TransDigm Group
Incorporated Fourth Amended and Restated
2003 Stock Option Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 21,
2007 (File No. 001-32833)

75

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Amendment No. 2 to TransDigm Group
Incorporated Fourth Amended and Restated
Stock Option Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2008
(File No. 001-32833)

Amendment No. 3 to TransDigm Group
Incorporated Fourth Amended and Restated
Stock Option Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2009
(File No. 001-32833)

TransDigm Group Incorporated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan*

Amendment No. 1, dated October 20, 2006, to
the TransDigm Group Incorporated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan*

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3
to TransDigm Group Incorporated’s Form S-1
filed March 13, 2006 (File No. 333-130483)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1
to TransDigm Inc. and TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form S-4 filed November 7,
2006 (File No. 333-137937)

Second Amendment to TransDigm Group
Incorporated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated
April 25, 2008*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Schedule 14A filed June 6, 2008
(File No. 001-32833)

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

TransDigm Group Incorporated 2014 Stock
Option Plan*

10.23

Director Share Plan*

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

10.30

Form of Option Agreements for options granted
in fiscal 2013*

Form of Option Agreements for options granted
in fiscal 2014*

Form of Option Agreements for options granted
in fiscal 2015*

Form of Option Agreements for options granted
in fiscal 2016*

Form of Stock Option Agreement for options
awarded in fiscal 2017*

Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option
Agreement dated November 13, 2014 between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and W.
Nicholas Howley*

Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option
Agreement dated November 10, 2016 between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and W.
Nicholas Howley (annual equity award)*

76

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 10,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 14,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 14,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed January 30,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 10,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 8,
2017 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed January 30,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form10-Q filed February 8,
2017 (File No. 001-32833)

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34

10.35

10.36

10.37

10.38

10.39

Exhibit No.

Description

Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option
Agreement dated November 10, 2016 between
TransDigm Group Incorporated and W.
Nicholas Howley (equity award in lieu of fiscal
2016 bonus and calendar 2017 salary)*

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form10-Q filed February 8,
2017 (File No. 001-32833)

Fourth Amended and Restated TransDigm
Group Incorporated 2003 Stock Option Plan
Dividend Equivalent Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed August 2, 2013
(File No. 001-32833)

Third Amended and Restated TransDigm
Group Incorporated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
Dividend Equivalent Plan*

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed August 2, 2013
(File No. 001-32833)

TransDigm Group Incorporated 2014 Stock
Option Plan Dividend Equivalent Plan*

Amendment and Restatement Agreement, and
Second Amendment and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2014, among
TransDigm Inc., TransDigm Group
Incorporated, the subsidiaries of TransDigm
Inc. from time to time party thereto, the lenders
party thereto, as lenders, and Credit Suisse AG,
as administrative agent

Incremental Assumption and Refinancing
Facility Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2015,
among TransDigm Inc., TransDigm Group
Incorporated, the subsidiary guarantors party
thereto, Credit Suisse AG, as administrative
agent and collateral agent, and the other agents
and lenders named therein

Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of
May 20, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, as
administrative agent and collateral agent, and
the other agents and lenders party thereto

Incremental Revolving Credit Assumption and
Refinancing Facility Agreement, dated as of
May 20, 2015, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, as
administrative agent and collateral agent and
the other agents and lenders party thereto

Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement
dated October 14, 2016 among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the
subsidiaries of TransDigm Inc. party thereto,
the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG,
as administrative and collateral agent

77

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 28,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed June 6, 2014
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 19, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 27, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed May 27, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed October 14,
2016 (File No. 001-32833)

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed March 8, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed August 24, 2017
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed March 6, 2013
(File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-Q filed February 5,
2014 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Exhibit No.

Description

10.40

10.41

10.42

10.43

10.44

10.45

Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
March 6, 2017, among TransDigm Inc., as
borrower, TransDigm Group Incorporated, as
guarantor, the subsidiary guarantors party
thereto, Credit Suisse AG, as administrative
agent and collateral agent, and the other agents
and lenders named therein

Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
August 22, 2017, among TransDigm Inc., as
borrower, TransDigm Group Incorporated, as
guarantor, the subsidiary guarantors party
thereto, Credit Suisse AG, as administrative
agent and collateral agent, and the other agents
and lenders named therein

Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as
of June 23, 2006, as amended and restated as of
December 6, 2010, as further amended and
restated as of February 14, 2011 and
February 28, 2013, among TransDigm Inc.,
TransDigm Group Incorporated, the
subsidiaries of TransDigm Inc. named therein
and Credit Suisse AG as administrative agent
and collateral agent

Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated
October 21, 2013, among TransDigm
Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc., PNC Bank,
National Association as a Purchaser and a
Purchaser Agent, the various other Purchasers
and Purchaser Agents from time to time party
thereto, and PNC National Association as
Administrator

First Amendment to the Receivables Purchase
Agreement, dated March 25, 2014, among
TransDigm Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc.,
PNC Bank, National Association as a
Purchaser, Purchaser Agent for its Purchaser
Group and as Administrator

Second Amendment to the Receivables
Purchase Agreement, dated August 8, 2014,
among TransDigm Receivables LLC,
TransDigm Inc., PNC Bank, National
Association, as a Committed Purchaser, as a
Purchaser Agent for its Purchaser Group and
Administrator, and Credit Agricole Corporate
and Investment Bank, as a Committed
Purchaser and as a Purchase Agent for its
Purchaser Group

78

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 10-K filed November 13,
2015 (File No. 001-32833)

Incorporated by reference to TransDigm Group
Incorporated’s Form 8-K filed August 7, 2015
(File No. 001-32833)

Filed Herewith

Exhibit No.

Description

Third Amendment to the Receivables Purchase
Agreement, dated March 20, 2015, among
TransDigm Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc.,
PNC Bank, National Association, as a
Committed Purchaser, as a Purchaser Agent for
its Purchaser Group and Administrator, Atlantic
Asset Securitization LLC, as a Conduit
Purchaser, and Credit Agricole Corporate and
Investment Bank, as a Committed Purchaser
and as a Purchase Agent for its and Atlantic’s
Purchaser Group

Fourth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase
Agreement dated as of August 4, 2015, among
TransDigm Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc.,
PNC Bank, National Association, as a
Committed Purchase, as a Purchaser Agent for
its Purchaser Group and Administrator, Atlantic
Asset Securitization LLC, as a Conduit
Purchaser, and Credit Agricole Corporate and
Investment Bank, as a Committed Purchaser
and as a Purchaser Agent for its and Atlantic’s
Purchaser Group

Ninth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase
Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, among
TransDigm Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc.,
PNC Bank, National Association, as a
Committed Purchaser, as Purchaser Agent for
its Purchaser Group and as Administrator,
Atlantic Asset Securitization LLC, as a Conduit
Purchaser, Credit Agricole Corporate and
Investment Bank, as a Committed Purchaser
and as a Purchaser Agent for its and Atlantic’s
Purchaser Group, and Fifth Third Bank, as a
Committed Purchaser and as Purchaser Agent
for its Purchaser Group

10.46

10.47

10.48

12.1

21.1

23.1

31.1

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges

Filed Herewith

Subsidiaries of TransDigm Group Incorporated

Filed Herewith

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

Certification by Principal Executive Officer of
TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

79

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed Herewith or Incorporated by Reference From

31.2

32.1

32.2

101

Certification by Principal Financial Officer of
TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification by Principal Executive Officer of
TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification by Principal Financial Officer of
TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

Filed Herewith

Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements formatted in XBRL.

Filed Herewith

* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan contract or arrangement.

80

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K:
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
ITEM 8 AND ITEM 15(a) (1)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX

Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

F-1

F-2

Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017, 2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for Fiscal Years Ended

September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016

and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7 to F-45

Supplementary Data:

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-46

81

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
TransDigm Group Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TransDigm Group Incorporated as of

September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30,
2017. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial
statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of TransDigm Group Incorporated at September, 30, 2017 and 2016, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

(United States), TransDigm Group Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,
2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated November 13,
2017, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
November 13, 2017

F-1

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

2017

2016

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Trade accounts receivable—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

650,561 $ 1,586,994
576,339
636,127
730,681
724,011
77,500
38,683

—
43,353

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT—Net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GOODWILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,133,552
324,924
5,745,338
1,717,862
53,985

2,930,697
310,580
5,679,452
1,764,343
41,205

TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,975,661

$10,726,277

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings—trade receivable securitization facility . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities held-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

69,454 $
299,587
148,761
335,888
17,304

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LONG-TERM DEBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

870,994
11,393,620
500,949
161,302

52,645
199,771
156,075
344,112
—

752,603
9,943,191
492,255
189,718

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,926,865

11,377,767

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:

Common stock—$.01 par value; authorized 224,400,000 shares; issued
56,093,659 and 55,767,767 shares at September 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost; 4,159,207 and 2,433,035 shares at September 30, 2017
and 2016, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

561
1,095,319
(3,187,220)
(85,143)

558
1,028,972
(1,146,963)
(149,787)

(774,721)

(384,270)

Total stockholders’ deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,951,204)

(651,490)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 9,975,661

$10,726,277

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-2

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

NET SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COST OF SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,504,286
1,519,659

$3,171,411
1,443,348

$2,707,115
1,257,270

GROSS PROFIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTEREST EXPENSE—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFINANCING COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX . . . . . .

1,984,627
415,575
89,226

1,479,826
602,589
39,807

1,728,063
382,858
77,445

1,267,760
483,850
15,794

837,430
208,889

628,541
(31,654)

768,116
181,702

586,414
—

1,449,845
321,624
54,219

1,074,002
418,785
18,393

636,824
189,612

447,212
—

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 596,887 $ 586,414

$ 447,212

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 437,630 $ 583,414

$ 443,847

Net earnings per share:

Net earnings per share from continuing operations—basic and

diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

8.45

$

10.39 $

7.84

Net loss per share from discontinued operations—basic and

diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

(0.57) $

— $

Net earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

7.88

Cash dividends paid per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

46.00

$

$

10.39 $

— $

—

7.84

—

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

Basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,530

56,157

56,606

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $596,887 $586,414
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

$447,212

Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swap and cap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,241
34,471
7,932

64,644

(31,846)
(9,648)
(12,284)

(29,448)
(35,604)
(5,786)

(53,778)

(70,838)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $661,531 $532,636

$376,374

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Common Stock

Number
of
Shares

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

Treasury Stock

Number
of
Shares

Value

Total

BALANCE—September 30,

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,832,246

$538

$ 794,767 $(2,150,293)

$ (25,171)

(1,415,100) $(175,940) $(1,556,099)

Unvested dividend equivalent

payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Compensation expense recognized
for employee stock options and
restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits related to share-
based payment arrangements . . .

Exercise of employee stock

options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swaps, net of tax . . . . .
Foreign currency translation

adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustments, net of
tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BALANCE—September 30,

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,248,175

13

19,673 —
—
—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

(14,151)

31,500

61,965

61,674
418
—
—

—

—

—

—

—
—

447,212

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—
(35,604)

(29,448)

(5,786)

—

—

—

—
—
—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—
—

—

—

(14,151)

31,500

61,965

61,687
418
447,212
(35,604)

(29,448)

(5,786)

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,100,094

551

950,324

(1,717,232)

(96,009)

(1,415,100) (175,940) (1,038,306)

Unvested dividend equivalent

payments and other . . . . . . . . . . .

Compensation expense recognized
for employee stock options and
restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of employee stock options
and restricted stock activity,
net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock purchased . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swaps and caps, net of
tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foreign currency translation

adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustments, net of
tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

payments and other . . . . . . . . . . .

Compensation expense recognized
for employee stock options and
restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exercise of employee stock

options, restricted stock activity
and other, net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock purchased . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swaps and caps, net of
tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foreign currency translation

adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension liability adjustments, net of
tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BALANCE—September 30,

BALANCE—September 30,

2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,767,767
—

Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested dividend equivalent

—

—

—

—

7

666,709
—
—
964 —
—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

558
—

—

—

3

324,908
—
—
984 —
—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(16,145)

48,306

30,112
—
230
—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—

586,414

—

—

—

1,028,972

(1,146,963)
— (2,422,295)

—

(214,849)

44,931

21,177
—
239
—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—

596,887

—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—
—

(9,648)

(31,846)

(12,284)

(149,787)

—

—

—

—
—
—
—

34,471

22,241

7,932

—

—

—

—

(2,548)

(575)
(1,015,387) (207,755)

—
—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

(16,145)

48,306

29,544
(207,755)
230
586,414

(9,648)

(31,846)

(12,284)

(2,433,035) (384,270)

(651,490)
— (2,422,295)

—

—

—

—

—

(214,849)

44,931

20,550
(389,821)
239
596,887

34,471

22,241

7,932

(2,548)

(630)
(1,723,624) (389,821)

—
—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,093,659

$561

$1,095,319 $(3,187,220)

$ (85,143)

(4,159,207) $(774,721) $(2,951,204)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating

$

596,887
31,654

$

586,414

$

447,212

—

—

activities:

Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of intangible assets and product certification costs . . . . . .
Amortization of debt issuance costs, original issue discount and

premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Refinancing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash equity compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in assets/liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions of

businesses:

Trade accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes receivable/payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,937
90,088

21,106
39,807
45,524
—
(918)

(54,669)
5,127
18,219
(10,564)
(10,354)
(958)
(33,153)

43,455
78,215

16,211
15,794
48,306
—
5,808

(80,114)
(2,073)
(12,299)
(4,919)
(6,657)
17,933
(22,776)

35,939
57,724

15,797
18,393
31,500
(61,965)
660

(25,418)
(25,974)
65,418
(12,392)
13,480
(3,934)
(35,502)

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

788,733

683,298

520,938

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Capital expenditures, net of disposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments made in connection with acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Schroth, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(71,013)
(136,295)
(79,695)

(43,982)
(1,399,064)

(54,871)
(1,624,278)

—

—

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(287,003)

(1,443,046)

(1,679,149)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from term loans, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment on term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from senior subordinated notes, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash tender and redemption of senior subordinated notes due 2021,

including premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Proceeds from trade receivable securitization facility, net
Financing fees and other

—
21,177
(2,581,552)
(389,821)
2,937,773
(1,284,698)
300,386

(528,847)
99,471
(17,571)

—
30,112
(3,000)
(207,755)
1,711,515
(834,409)
939,584

—
—
(3,580)

61,965
61,674
(3,365)
—

1,515,954
(1,025,318)
445,303

—
—
(1,266)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,443,682)

1,632,467

1,054,947

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH

EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,519

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . .

(936,433)
1,586,994

242

872,961
714,033

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the period for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cash paid during the period for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

$

650,561

$ 1,586,994

587,718

185,295

$

$

448,608

183,291

(2,251)

(105,515)
819,548

714,033

398,939

127,363

$

$

$

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

Description of the Business—TransDigm Group Incorporated (“TD Group”), through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, TransDigm Inc., is a leading global designer, producer and supplier of highly engineered aircraft
components for use on nearly all commercial and military aircraft in service today. TransDigm Inc., along with
TransDigm Inc.’s direct and indirect wholly-owned operating subsidiaries (collectively, with TD Group, the
“Company” or “TransDigm”), offers a broad range of proprietary aerospace components. TD Group has no
significant assets or operations other than its 100% ownership of TransDigm Inc. TD Group’s common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the trading symbol “TDG.”

Major product offerings, substantially all of which are ultimately provided to end-users in the aerospace
industry, include mechanical/electro-mechanical actuators and controls, ignition systems and engine technology,
specialized pumps and valves, power conditioning devices, specialized AC/DC electric motors and generators,
NiCad batteries and chargers, engineered latching and locking devices, rods and locking devices, engineered
connectors and elastomers, databus and power controls, cockpit security components and systems, specialized
cockpit displays, aircraft audio systems, specialized lavatory components, seat belts and safety restraints,
engineered interior surfaces and related components, lighting and control technology, military personnel
parachutes, high performance hoists, winches and lifting devices, and cargo loading, handling and delivery
systems.

2. ACQUISITIONS

During the last three fiscal years, the Company completed the acquisitions of Schroth, Y&F/Tactair, DDC,

Breeze-Eastern, PneuDraulics, Pexco Aerospace, Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH and Telair Cargo Group.
Additionally, during the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company acquired three separate aerospace product
lines (collectively, the “Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions”). The Company accounted for the acquisitions using
the acquisition method and included the results of operations of the acquisitions in its consolidated financial
statements from the effective date of each acquisition. As of September 30, 2017, the one-year measurement
period is open for Schroth and the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions and therefore the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed related to these acquisitions are subject to adjustment until the end of the respective one-year
measurement period. The Company is in the process of obtaining a third-party valuation of certain tangible and
intangible assets of the Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions; therefore, the values attributed to those acquired assets
and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements are subject to adjustment. Pro forma net sales and results
of operations for the acquisitions, had they occurred at the beginning of the applicable fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 or 2016, are not material and, accordingly, are not provided.

The acquisitions strengthen and expand the Company’s position to design, produce and supply highly
engineered proprietary aerospace components in niche markets with significant aftermarket content and provide
opportunities to create value through the application of our three core value-driven operating strategies (obtaining
profitable new business, improving our cost structure, and providing highly engineered value-added products to
customers). The purchase price paid for each acquisition reflects the current earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and cash flows, as well as the future EBITDA and cash flows expected
to be generated by the business, which are driven in most cases by the recurring aftermarket consumption over
the life of a particular aircraft, estimated to be approximately 25 to 30 years.

Third Quarter 2017 Acquisitions—During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company acquired the Third

Quarter 2017 Acquisitions for a total purchase price of approximately $106.3 million in cash, which includes
working capital settlements totaling $1.0 million paid in the third and fourth quarter of 2017. All three product
lines consist primarily of proprietary, sole source products with significant aftermarket content. The products

F-7

include highly engineered aerospace controls, quick disconnect couplings, and communication electronics. Each
product line acquired was consolidated into an existing TransDigm reporting unit within TransDigm’s Power &
Control segment. The Company expects that approximately $62 million of goodwill recognized for the
acquisitions will be deductible for tax purposes over 15 years and approximately $9 million of goodwill
recognized for the acquisitions will not be deductible for tax purposes.

Schroth—On February 22, 2017, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Schroth Safety
Products GmbH and certain aviation and defense assets and liabilities from subsidiaries of Takata Corporation
(collectively, “Schroth”), for a total purchase price of approximately $89.7 million, of which $79.7 million was
paid in cash (including a working capital settlement of $0.8 million paid in the third quarter of 2017) and the
remaining approximately $10.0 million of which is accrued primarily related to an indemnity holdback to be
settled within the one-year measurement period.

In connection with the settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of the

acquisition, during the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to dispose of the Schroth business.
Therefore, Schroth was classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2017. The results of operations of Schroth
are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Schroth designs
and manufactures proprietary, highly engineered, advanced safety systems for aviation, racing and military
ground vehicles around the world. Prior to being classified as discontinued operations, Schroth was included in
TransDigm’s Airframe segment.

The loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income includes a $32.0 million
impairment charge to write down Schroth’s assets to estimated fair value. The impairment charge recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2017 was based on an internal assessment around the recovery of the Schroth assets. Schroth’s
assets have been recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017. Further
disclosure related to Schroth’s discontinued operations is included in Note 22.

Y&F/Tactair—On September 23, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Young &
Franklin, Inc., the parent company of Tactair Fluid Controls, Inc., for approximately $258.8 million in cash,
which includes a working capital settlement of $2.7 million paid in the first quarter of 2017. Y&F/Tactair
manufactures proprietary, highly engineered valves and actuators. Y&F/Tactair is included in TransDigm’s
Power & Control segment. The purchase price includes approximately $74.5 million of tax benefits being
realized by the Company over a 15-year period that began in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company
expects that approximately $124 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition will be deductible for tax
purposes over 15 years and approximately $8 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition will not be
deductible for tax purposes.

Data Device Corporation—On June 23, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of ILC

Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Data Device Corporation, for a total purchase price of approximately
$997.7 million in cash, which includes a working capital settlement of $1.4 million received in the first quarter of
fiscal 2017. TransDigm financed the acquisition of DDC with cash proceeds from the issuance of senior
subordinated notes due in June 2026 and term loans. DDC is a supplier of databus and power controls and related
products that are used primarily in military avionics, commercial aerospace and space applications. DDC is
included in TransDigm’s Power & Control segment.

F-8

The total purchase price of DDC was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed

based upon management’s estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. To the extent the purchase price
exceeded the estimated fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, such excess was
allocated to goodwill. The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation of the estimated fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the transaction date (in thousands).

Assets acquired:

Current assets, excluding cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities assumed:

$ 107,728
20,818
229,300
750,935
2,036

1,110,817

Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26,520
86,642

Total liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113,162

Net assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 997,655

Approximately $740 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes

and approximately $11 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is deductible for tax purposes over 15
years.

Breeze-Eastern—On January 4, 2016, the Company completed the tender offer for all of the outstanding
stock of Breeze-Eastern for $19.61 per share in cash. The purchase price was approximately $205.9 million, of
which $146.4 million (net of cash acquired of $30.8 million) was paid at closing and $34.9 million was paid to
dissenting shareholders during the first fiscal quarter of 2017. Of the $34.9 million payment, $28.7 million
related to the original merger consideration and $6.2 million represented the settlement reached with the
dissenting shareholders resolving the dispute over the dissenting shareholders’ statutory appraisal action. Of the
$6.2 million settlement, $4.9 million was recorded as selling and administrative expense and $1.3 million was
recorded as interest expense for statutory interest arising under Delaware General Corporate Law. Once the
Company paid the $34.9 million settlement to the dissenting shareholders on October 20, 2016, the dissenting
stockholders fully released their claims against the Company. Breeze-Eastern manufactures high performance
lifting and pulling devices for military and civilian aircraft, including rescue hoists, winches and cargo hooks,
and weapons-lifting systems. Breeze-Eastern is included in TransDigm’s Power & Control segment. All of the
approximately $115 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

PneuDraulics—On August 19, 2015, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of PneuDraulics,
Inc. for approximately $321.5 million in cash, which is net of a working capital settlement received in fiscal 2016
of $2.0 million. PneuDraulics manufactures proprietary, highly engineered aerospace pneumatic and hydraulic
components and subsystems for commercial transport, regional, business jet and military applications.
PneuDraulics is included in TransDigm’s Power & Control segment. The purchase price includes approximately
$108.1 million of tax benefits being realized by the Company over a 15-year period that began in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2015. All of the approximately $223 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is
deductible for tax purposes.

Pexco Aerospace—On May 14, 2015, the Company acquired the assets of the aerospace business of Pexco
LLC (“Pexco Aerospace”) for a total purchase price of approximately $496.4 million in cash. Pexco Aerospace
manufactures extruded plastic interior parts for use in the commercial aerospace industry. Pexco Aerospace is
included in TransDigm’s Airframe segment. The purchase price includes approximately $166.4 million of tax

F-9

benefits being realized by TransDigm over a 15-year period that began in the third quarter of fiscal 2015. All of
the approximately $406 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is deductible for tax purposes.

Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH—On March 31, 2015, the Company acquired the aerospace business of
Franke Aquarotter GmbH (now known as Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH) for approximately $75.3 million in
cash. Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH manufactures proprietary faucets and related products for use on commercial
transports and regional jets. Adams Rite Aerospace GmbH is included in TransDigm’s Airframe segment. All of
the approximately $64 million of goodwill recognized for the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

Telair Cargo Group—On March 26, 2015, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Telair
International GmbH (“Telair Europe”), all of the outstanding stock of Nordisk Aviation Products (“Nordisk”) and
the assets of the AAR Cargo business (collectively, “Telair Cargo Group”). The total purchase price was
approximately $730.9 million in cash. Telair Cargo Group manufactures aerospace on-board cargo loading and
handling, restraint systems and unit load devices for a variety of commercial and military platforms with
positions on a wide range of new and existing aircraft. The business consists of three reporting units: Telair
Europe, Nordisk and Telair US. Telair Europe and Telair US are included in TransDigm’s Power & Control
segment and Nordisk is included in TransDigm’s Airframe segment. Approximately $33 million of goodwill
recognized for the acquisition is deductible for tax purposes and approximately $450 million of goodwill
recognized for the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

3.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation—The accompanying consolidated financial statements were
prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include
the accounts of TD Group and subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to the current period annual and interim final statements as
during the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to disposing of Schroth. As of September 30, 2017,
Schroth was classified as held-for-sale and the results of operations for Schroth are reflected as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 22, “Discontinued Operations,”
for further information.

Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances—Revenue is recognized from the sale of products when title
and risk of loss passes to the customer, which is generally at the time of shipment. Substantially all product sales
are made pursuant to firm, fixed-price purchase orders received from customers. Provisions for estimated returns,
uncollectible accounts and the cost of repairs under contract warranty provisions are provided for in the same
period as the related revenues are recorded and are principally based on historical results modified, as
appropriate, by the most current information available. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is
possible that actual results may vary from the estimates.

Shipping and Handling Costs—Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in the

consolidated statements of income.

Research and Development Costs—The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred
and classifies such amounts in selling and administrative expenses. The expense recognized for research and
development costs for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $73.8 million,
$58.6 million, and $48.3 million, respectively.

Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months

or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts—The Company reserves for amounts determined to be uncollectible
based on specific identification of losses and estimated losses based on historical experience. The allowance also

F-10

incorporates a provision for the estimated impact of disputes with customers. The determination of the amount of
the allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to significant levels of judgment and estimation by management. If
circumstances change or economic conditions deteriorate or improve, the allowance for doubtful accounts could
increase or decrease.

Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories is generally

determined by the average cost and the first-in, first-out (FIFO) methods and includes material, labor and
overhead related to the manufacturing process. Provision for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory is
made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and future sales forecasts.

Property, Plant and Equipment—Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and include

improvements which significantly increase capacities or extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: land
improvements from 10 to 20 years, buildings and improvements from 5 to 30 years, machinery and equipment
from 2 to 10 years and furniture and fixtures from 3 to 10 years. Net gains or losses related to asset dispositions
are recognized in earnings in the period in which dispositions occur. Routine maintenance, repairs and
replacements are expensed as incurred.

Property, plant and equipment is assessed for potential impairment whenever indicators of impairment are

present by determining whether the carrying value of the property can be recovered through projected,
undiscounted cash flows from future operations over the property’s remaining estimated useful life. Any
impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value
is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not
available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of
estimated future cash flows.

Debt Issuance Costs, Premiums and Discounts—The cost of obtaining financing as well as premiums and

discounts are amortized using the effective interest method over the terms of the respective obligations as a
component of interest expense within the consolidated statements of income. Debt issuance costs are presented in
the consolidated balance sheets as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liabilities.

Intangible Assets—Intangible assets consist of identifiable intangibles acquired or recognized in accounting

for the acquisitions (trademarks, trade names, technology, order backlog and other intangible assets) and
goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives (i.e., trademarks and trade names) are
subject to annual impairment testing. Management determines fair value using a discounted future cash flow
analysis or other accepted valuation techniques. The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill
and other intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently, if an
event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce fair value below current value.

At the time of goodwill impairment testing, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine
whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, and
whether it is therefore necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The quantitative goodwill
impairment test consists of two steps. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential
impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit (as defined) with its carrying amount, including goodwill.
If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired, and the
second step of the goodwill impairment test is unnecessary. The second step measures the amount of impairment,
if any, by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill associated with a reporting unit to the implied fair value
of the goodwill derived from the estimated overall fair value of the reporting unit and the individual fair values of
the other assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.

GAAP requires that the annual, and any interim, impairment assessment be performed at the reporting unit

level. The reporting unit level is one level below an operating segment. Substantially all goodwill was

F-11

determined and recognized for each reporting unit pursuant to the accounting for the merger or acquisition as of
the date of each transaction. With respect to acquisitions integrated into an existing reporting unit, any acquired
goodwill is combined with the goodwill of the reporting unit.

The impairment test for indefinite lived intangible assets consists of a comparison between their fair values
and carrying values. If the carrying amounts of intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives exceed their fair
values, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to the sum of any such excesses.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its amortizable intangible assets only when indicators of
impairment are present by determining whether the amortization over their remaining lives can be recovered
through projected, undiscounted cash flows from future operations. Amortization of amortizable intangible assets
is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: technology from 20 to 22
years, order backlog over one year, and other intangible assets over 20 years.

Stock-Based Compensation—The Company records stock-based compensation expense using the fair value
method of accounting. Compensation expense is recorded over the vesting periods of the stock options, restricted
stock and other stock-based incentives. No expense is recognized for any stock options, restricted stock and other
stock-based incentives ultimately forfeited because the recipients fail to meet vesting requirements.

Income Taxes—The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach. Deferred

taxes are recorded for the difference between the book and tax basis of various assets and liabilities. A valuation
allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Contingencies—During the ordinary course of business, the Company is from time to time threatened with,

or may become a party to, legal actions and other proceedings. While the Company is currently involved in
certain legal proceedings, it believes the results of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to

make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)—The term “comprehensive income (loss)” represents the change in

stockholders’ equity (deficit) from transactions and other events and circumstances resulting from
non-stockholder sources. The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, consisting
principally of fair value adjustments to its interest rate swap and cap agreements (net of tax), cumulative foreign
currency translation adjustments and pension liability adjustments (net of tax), is reported separately in the
accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions—The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries located outside

the United States are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates.
Revenue and expense items are translated at the average monthly exchange rates prevailing during the period.
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized currently in income, and those
resulting from translation of financial statements are accumulated as a separate component of other
comprehensive income (loss) for the period. Foreign currency gains or losses recognized currently in income
from changes in exchange rates were immaterial to our results of operations.

Earnings per Share—Earnings per share information is determined using the two-class method, which
includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and other securities that
participate in dividends (“participating securities”). Our vested stock options are considered “participating
securities” because they include non-forfeitable rights to dividends. In applying the two-class method, earnings

F-12

are allocated to both common stock shares and participating securities based on their respective weighted-
average shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share information may include the additional
effect of other securities, if dilutive, in which case the dilutive effect of such securities is calculated using the
treasury stock method. Contingently issuable shares are not included in earnings per share until the period in
which the contingency is satisfied; therefore, basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.

4. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update

(“ASU”) 2014-09, which creates a new topic in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, “Revenue
From Contracts With Customers.” In addition to superseding and replacing nearly all existing U.S. GAAP
revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance, ASC 606 establishes a new control-based
revenue recognition model; changes the basis for deciding when revenue is recognized over time or at a point in
time; provides new and more detailed guidance on specific topics; and expands and improves disclosures about
revenue. The new revenue standards may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or
retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The guidance is effective for the
Company for annual reporting periods, including interim periods therein, beginning October 1, 2018, which is the
Company’s planned date of adoption. The Company preliminarily expects to use the full retrospective method.
The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the standard, and the planned adoption method is subject to
change. For each reporting unit, we have evaluated a representative sample of contracts and other agreements
with our customers and evaluated the provisions contained within these contracts and agreements in
consideration of the five step model specified within ASC 606. We are in the process of documenting the impact
of the standard on our current accounting policies and practices in order to identify material differences, if any,
that would result from applying the new requirements to our revenue contracts. We continue to make progress on
our assessment of ASC 606 and are also in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, on changes to our
business processes, systems, and controls to support recognition and disclosure requirements under ASC 606.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period

Adjustments,” a new standard intended to simplify the accounting for measurement period adjustments in a
business combination. Measurement period adjustments are changes to provisional amounts recorded when the
accounting for a business combination is incomplete as of the end of a reporting period. The measurement period
can extend for up to a year following the transaction date. During the measurement period, companies may make
adjustments to provisional amounts when information necessary to complete the measurement is received. The
new guidance requires companies to recognize these adjustments, including any related impacts to net income, in
the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined. Companies are no longer required to retroactively
apply measurement period adjustments to all periods presented. The guidance was effective for the Company on
October 1, 2016. However, as early adoption was permissible, the Company adopted the pronouncement
beginning October 1, 2015. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (ASC 842),” which will require that a lessee

recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than twelve months,
with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability. The guidance is effective for the
Company for annual reporting periods, including interim periods therein, beginning October 1, 2019, with early
adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting.” The guidance requires the recognition of the income tax effects of awards in the income statement
when the awards vest or are settled, thus eliminating additional paid in capital pools. The guidance also allows
for the employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering
liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur

F-13

rather than on an estimated basis. ASU 2016-09 was effective for the Company for annual reporting periods,
including interim periods therein, beginning October 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. As early adoption is
permissible, the Company adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Changes were applied
prospectively in accordance with the standard and prior periods were not adjusted. In addition, the Company
continued to account for forfeitures on an estimated basis.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13),” which changes the impairment model for most financial
assets. The new model uses a forward-looking expected loss method, which will generally result in earlier
recognition of allowances for losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial
statements and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows—Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments,” which clarifies existing guidance related to accounting for cash receipts and cash
payments and classification on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The
Company elected to early adopt this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of this standard
did not have a significant impact on its consolidated statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” to
eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test in order to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill.
The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for
interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of
this standard is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC 718): Scope of

Modification Accounting,” which provides clarity on which changes to the terms or conditions of share-based
payment awards require an entity to apply the modification accounting provisions required in ASC 718. The
standard is effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption
permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The
adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815): Targeted
Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities,” which amends the FASB’s hedge accounting model to
enable entities to better portray their risk management activities in financial statements. The guidance eliminates
the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change
in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item.
The guidance also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for
components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.

F-14

5. EARNINGS PER SHARE (TWO-CLASS METHOD)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except

per share data):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

Numerator for earnings per share:
Net income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 628,541 $586,414 $447,212
(3,365)
Less dividends paid on participating securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(159,257)

(3,000)

Net loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

469,284
(31,654)

583,414

—

443,847
—

Net income applicable to common stock—basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 437,630 $583,414 $443,847

Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share under the

two-class method:

Weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested options deemed participating securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total shares for basic and diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52,517
3,013

55,530

53,326
2,831

56,157

Net earnings per share from continuing operations—basic and diluted . . . . . . $
Net loss per share from discontinued operations—basic and diluted . . . . . . . .

8.45
(0.57)

$ 10.39
—

Net earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

7.88

$ 10.39

53,112
3,494

56,606

$

$

7.84
—

7.84

6.

SALES AND TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Sales—The Company’s sales and receivables are concentrated in the aerospace industry. TransDigm’s
customers include: distributors of aerospace components; commercial airlines, large commercial transport and
regional and business aircraft OEMs; various armed forces of the United States and friendly foreign
governments; defense OEMs; system suppliers; and various other industrial customers.

Two customers accounted for approximately 13%, 13% and 11% and 11%, 12% and 12% of the Company’s

net sales for fiscal years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sales to these customers were split
approximately evenly between the Power & Control and Airframe segments. Sales to foreign customers,
primarily in Western Europe, Canada and Asia, were $1,318.9 million, $1,169.5 million and $881.1 million
during fiscal years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Trade Accounts Receivable—Trade accounts receivable consist of the following at September 30 (in

thousands):

Trade accounts receivable—gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $639,946 $580,753
(4,414)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3,819)

Trade accounts receivable—net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$636,127 $576,339

2017

2016

At September 30, 2017, approximately 12% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable was due from one
customer. In addition, approximately 42% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable was due from entities that
principally operate outside of the United States. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of each customer’s
financial condition and collateral is generally not required.

F-15

7.

INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following at September 30 (in thousands):

Raw materials and purchased component parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work-in-progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished Goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$496,899
187,009
131,548

$464,410
188,417
153,253

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves for excess and obsolete inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

815,456
(84,775)

806,080
(82,069)

Inventories—net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$730,681

$724,011

2017

2016

8.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at September 30 (in thousands):

2017

2016

Land and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery, equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 56,554
161,990
376,659
22,037

$ 57,510
153,691
338,527
15,958

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

617,240
(292,316)

565,686
(255,106)

Property, plant and equipment—net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 324,924

$ 310,580

9.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Other intangible assets—net in the consolidated balance sheets consist of the following at September 30 (in

thousands):

2017

2016

Gross Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net

Gross Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net

Trademarks and trade names . . . . $ 729,931
1,292,719
Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29,000
Order backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63,599
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other

$ — $ 729,931 $ 720,263
1,279,335
941,081
55,341
2,332
43,331
44,518

351,638
26,668
19,081

$ — $ 720,263
990,906
25,700
27,474

288,429
29,641
15,857

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,115,249

$397,387 $1,717,862 $2,098,270

$333,927 $1,764,343

Information regarding the amortization expense of amortizable intangible assets is detailed below (in

thousands):

Annual Amortization Expense:

Years ended September 30,

2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$89,226
77,445
54,219

F-16

Estimated Amortization Expense:

Years ending September 30,

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$69,344
67,011
67,011
67,011
67,011

Intangible assets acquired during the year ended September 30, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

Intangible assets not subject to amortization:

Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks and trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Intangible assets subject to amortization:

Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Order backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gross Amount

Amortization
Period

$129,152
12,100

141,252

33,800
4,500

38,300

20 years
1 year

18 years

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$179,552

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016

and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

Power &
Control

Airframe

Non-
aviation

Total

Balance at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,238,443

$2,392,408

$55,369

$4,686,220

Goodwill acquired during the year

(Note 2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase price allocation adjustments . . .
. . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustment

1,008,510
505
32

—
(792)
(15,023)

—
—
—

1,008,510
(287)
(14,991)

Balance at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,247,490

2,376,593

55,369

5,679,452

Goodwill acquired during the year

(Note 2)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

70,369

58,783

Write-down of discontinued operations

(Note 22)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

(32,000)

Reclass of goodwill acquired to assets

held-for-sale (Note 22) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase price allocation adjustments . . .
. . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustment

—
(9,972)
—

(26,783)
—
5,489

—

—

—
—
—

129,152

(32,000)

(26,783)
(9,972)
5,489

Balance at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,307,887

$2,382,082

$55,369

$5,745,338

F-17

10. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following at September 30 (in thousands):

2017

2016

Compensation and related benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Breeze-Eastern dissenting shares (see Note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product warranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend equivalent payments—current (see Note 17) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 68,945
82,222
—
20,740
22,971
56,506
84,504

$ 69,323
83,180
33,644
29,191
24,334
19,503
84,937

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$335,888

$344,112

11. DEBT

The Company’s debt consists of the following at September 30 (in thousands):

2017

Gross Amount

Debt Issuance
Costs

Original Issue
Discount or
Premium

Net Amount

Short-term borrowings—trade

receivable securitization facility . . . .

$

300,000

$

(413)

$ —

$

299,587

Term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 6,973,009
550,000
1,150,000
1,200,000
750,000
950,000

11,573,009
70,031

$(64,104)
(3,243)
(6,941)
(8,042)
(4,033)
(8,806)

(95,169)
(577)

$(18,948)

—
—
—
4,182
—

(14,766)
—

$ 6,889,957
546,757
1,143,059
1,191,958
750,149
941,194

11,463,074
69,454

Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$11,502,978

$(94,592)

$(14,766)

$11,393,620

2016

Gross Amount

Debt Issuance
Costs

Original Issue
Discount or
Premium

Net Amount

Short-term borrowings—trade

receivable securitization facility . . . . .

$

200,000

$

(229)

$ —

$ 199,771

Term loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 5,288,708
550,000
500,000
1,150,000
1,200,000
450,000
950,000

10,088,708
53,074

$(42,662)
(4,299)
(3,141)
(8,381)
(9,218)
(4,144)
(9,588)

(81,433)
(429)

$(11,439)

—
—
—
—
—
—

(11,439)
—

$5,234,607
545,701
496,859
1,141,619
1,190,782
445,856
940,412

9,995,836
52,645

Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10,035,634

$(81,004)

$(11,439)

$9,943,191

F-18

Trade Receivable Securitization Facility

During fiscal 2014, the Company established a trade receivable securitization facility (the “Securitization

Facility”). The Securitization Facility effectively increases the Company’s borrowing capacity depending on the
amount of the domestic operations’ trade accounts receivable. The Securitization Facility includes the right for
the Company to exercise annual one year extensions as long as there have been no termination events as defined
by the agreement. The Company uses the proceeds from the Securitization Facility as an alternative to other
forms of debt, effectively reducing borrowing costs. In August 2017, the Company amended the Securitization
Facility to increase the borrowing capacity to $300 million and extend the maturity date to August 1, 2018. As of
September 30, 2017, the Company has borrowed $300 million under the Securitization Facility. The
Securitization Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s domestic operations’ trade accounts
receivable.

Repurchase of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021

On October 13, 2016, the Company announced a cash tender offer for any and all of its outstanding 2021

Notes. On October 27, 2016, the Company redeemed a principal amount of approximately $158 million in 2021
Notes outstanding for total consideration of $1,060.50 (plus accrued and unpaid interest) for each $1,000
aggregate principal amount. The total consideration included an early tender premium of $30.00 per $1,000
principal amount of 2021 Notes payable only with respect to each note validly tendered and not revoked on or
before October 26, 2016. On November 28, 2016, pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the 2021
Notes, the Company redeemed the remaining principal of $342 million in 2021 Notes outstanding at a
redemption price of 105.625% of the principal amount (plus accrued and unpaid interest).

The Company recorded refinancing costs of $31.9 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017

representing debt issuance costs expensed in conjunction with the redemption of the 2021 Notes. The costs
consisted of the premium of $28.8 million paid to redeem the $500 million of 2021 Notes and the write-off of
$3.1 million in unamortized debt issuance costs.

Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement

On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into an Incremental Term Loan Assumption Agreement (the

“Assumption Agreement”) with Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and as a lender,
in connection with the 2016 term loans. The Assumption Agreement, among other things, provides for
(i) additional tranche F term loans in an aggregate principal amount equal to $650 million, which were fully
drawn on October 14, 2016, and (ii) additional delayed draw tranche F term loans in an aggregate principal
amount not to exceed $500 million, which were fully drawn on October 27, 2016, the proceeds of which were
used to repurchase the Company’s 2021 Notes. The terms and conditions that apply to the additional tranche F
term loans and the additional delayed draw tranche F term loans are substantially the same as the terms and
conditions that apply to the tranche F term loans under the 2016 term loans immediately prior to the Assumption
Agreement.

The Company capitalized $11.3 million and expensed $0.2 million in refinancing costs associated with the

Assumption Agreement during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

Issuance of Senior Subordinated Notes

On March 1, 2017, TransDigm Inc. issued $300 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2025 Notes at

an issue price of 101.5% of the principal amount. The new notes offered were an additional issuance to our
existing $450 million of 2025 Notes. The new notes offered, together with the existing 2025 Notes, are treated as
a single class for all purposes under the indenture.

The 2025 Notes bear interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, which accrues from November 15, 2016 and is
payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing on May 15, 2017. The

F-19

2025 Notes mature on May 15, 2025, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased, and are subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the indentures governing the 2025 Notes.

In addition to the premium of $4.5 million recorded upon the issuance of the additional $300 million of

2025 Notes, the Company capitalized $0.4 million and expensed $3.7 million in refinancing costs representing
fees associated with the issuance of the additional $300 million of 2025 Notes during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017.

Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement

On March 6, 2017, TD Group and certain subsidiaries of TransDigm entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 4, 2014, with Credit Suisse AG, as administrative
agent and collateral agent (the “Agent”), and the other agents and lenders named therein. Amendment No. 2
permits, among other things, up to $1.5 billion of dividends and share repurchases over twelve months. If any
portion of the $1.5 billion is not used for dividends or share repurchases over the twelve month period, such
amount (not to exceed $500 million) may be used to repurchase stock at any time thereafter. Amendment No. 2
also increased the general investment basket to the greater of $400 million and 8% of consolidated total assets.

The Company capitalized $10.3 million and expensed $0.3 million in refinancing costs representing fees

associated with Amendment No. 2 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement

On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement. Pursuant to Amendment No. 3, TransDigm, among other things, incurred new Tranche G
Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount equal to approximately $1.8 billion and repaid in full all of the
Tranche C term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The Tranche G Term Loans were fully drawn on
August 22, 2017. The Tranche G Term Loans mature on August 22, 2024. The terms and conditions (other than
maturity date) that apply to the Tranche G Term Loans, including pricing, are substantially the same as the terms
and conditions that apply to the Tranche C term loans immediately prior to Amendment No. 3. Amendment No. 3
also permitted (a) payment of a special dividend, share repurchase, or combination thereof, in an aggregate
amount up to approximately $1.3 billion within 60 days of the effective date of Amendment No. 3, and
(b) certain additional restricted payments, including the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends or
repurchase stock, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1.5 billion within twelve months of the effective date of
Amendment No. 3 and is subject to 6.0x consolidated net leverage ratio for dividends and 4.0x consolidated
secured net debt ratio for share repurchases. If any portion of the $1.5 billion is not used for dividends or share
repurchases over such twelve month period, such amount (not to exceed $500 million) may be used to repurchase
stock at any time thereafter.

The Company capitalized $7.1 million representing fees associated with Amendment No. 3 during the fiscal

year ended September 30, 2017.

The Company capitalized $16.5 million and expensed $2.2 million in refinancing costs representing debt

issuances costs associated with the Tranche G Term Loans during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.
Additionally, the Company wrote-off $1.5 million in unamortized debt issuance costs related to the Tranche C
Term Loans.

F-20

Term Loans

As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, TransDigm had $6,973.0 million and $5,288.7 million in fully drawn
term loans and $600.0 million in revolving commitments. The term loans consist of five tranches as follows (in
millions):

Term Loan Facility

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

Tranche C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 28, 2020 LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
Tranche D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
Tranche E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
Tranche F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIBO rate(1) + 3.00%
Tranche G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 22, 2024

June 4, 2021
May 14, 2022
June 9, 2023

2017

$ —
$ 798.1
$1,503.4
$2,857.0
$1,814.5

2016

$1,228.3
$ 806.4
$1,518.0
$1,736.0
$ —

Aggregate Principal as of September 30,

The interest rates per annum applicable to all of the existing tranches of term loans are, at TransDigm’s
option, equal to either an alternate base rate or an adjusted LIBO rate for one, two, three or six-month (or to the
extent agreed to by each relevant lender, nine or twelve-month) interest periods chosen by TransDigm, in each
case plus an applicable margin percentage. The adjusted LIBO rate is subject to a floor of 0.75%. At
September 30, 2017 and 2016, the applicable interest rates were as follows:

Term Loan Facility

Tranche C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tranche D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tranche E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tranche F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tranche G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Interest Rate as of September 30,

2017

— %
4.24%
4.24%
4.24%
4.26%

2016

3.75%
3.75%
3.75%
3.75%
— %

Debt Issuance Costs, Premiums and Discounts

During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded refinancing costs of $39.8 million
representing debt issuance costs and premium expensed in conjunction with the new Tranche G Term Loans, the
refinancing of the Tranche C Term Loans, and additional $300 million tack-on to the 6.375% Senior
Subordinated Notes. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded refinancing costs of
$15.8 million representing debt issuance costs expensed in conjunction with the refinancing of the Tranche C
Term Loans. During the year ended September 30, 2015 the Company recorded refinancing costs of
$18.4 million representing debt issuance costs expensed in conjunction with the refinancing of the Tranche B
Term Loans and Revolving B Commitments.

Interest Rate Swap and Cap Agreements

See Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging Instruments” for information about how our interest rate swap and

cap agreements are used to manage interest rate risk associated with floating-rate borrowings under our credit
facilities.

Senior Subordinated Notes

Senior Subordinated Notes

Aggregate Principal

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

2020 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 550 million
$1,150 million
$1,200 million
$ 750 million
$ 950 million

October 15, 2020
July 15, 2022
July 15, 2024
May 15, 2025
June 15, 2026

5.50%
6.00%
6.50%
6.50%
6.375%

F-21

The Notes are subordinated to all of TransDigm’s existing and future senior debt, rank equally with all of its
existing and future senior subordinated debt and rank senior to all of its future debt that is expressly subordinated
to the Notes. The Notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by TD Group and its 100%-
owned domestic subsidiaries named in the indentures. The guarantees of the Notes are subordinated to all of the
guarantors’ existing and future senior debt, rank equally with all of their existing and future senior subordinated
debt and rank senior to all of their future debt that is expressly subordinated to the guarantees of the Notes. See
Note 25, “Supplemental Guarantor Information,” for further details. The Notes are structurally subordinated to
all of the liabilities of TD Group’s non-guarantor subsidiaries. The Notes contain many of the restrictive
covenants included in the Restated Credit Agreement. TransDigm is in compliance with all the covenants
contained in the Notes.

At September 30, 2017, future maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

Years ended September 30,

2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter

$

70,031
70,031
70,031
1,385,219
2,641,834
7,335,863

$11,573,009

12. RETIREMENT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plans—The Company sponsors certain defined contribution employee savings plans

that cover substantially all of the Company’s non-union employees. Under certain plans, the Company
contributes a percentage of employee compensation and matches a portion of employee contributions. The cost
recognized for such contributions for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately
$14.6 million, $12.7 million and $9.9 million, respectively.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans—The Company maintains certain non-contributory defined benefit pension

plans. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute actuarially determined amounts allowable under tax and
statutory regulations for the qualified plans. The Company uses a September 30th measurement date for its
defined benefit pension plans.

The Company maintains certain qualified, non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, which together
cover certain union employees. The plans provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The plan
assets as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $69.9 million and $67.0 million, respectively. The
Company’s projected benefit obligation for these defined benefit pension plans at September 30, 2017 and 2016
was $91.7 million and $100.6 million, respectively. The total liability recognized at September 30, 2017 and
2016 was $21.8 million and $33.6 million, respectively. The decrease in the total liability at September 30, 2017
compared to September 30, 2016 is primarily attributable to the change in pension assumptions, particularly a
higher discount rate and expected rate of return on assets, for the AmSafe Bridport Limited pension plan.

The net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended

September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $1.7 million, $1.0 million, and $0.6 million, respectively.

The Company has a non-qualified, non-contributory defined benefit pension plan, which covers certain

retired employees. The plan is unfunded and provides defined benefits based on the final average salary of the
employees as defined in the plan. The projected benefit obligation for this defined benefit pension plan and the
total liability recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$8.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated
statements of income for each of the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0.4 million.

F-22

13. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income tax provision on income from continuing operations consists of the following for

the periods shown below (in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

Current

Federal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$179,884
8,596
21,327

$153,957
9,234
12,703

$163,182
7,823
17,947

209,807

175,894

188,952

Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(918)

5,808

660

$208,889

$181,702

$189,612

The differences between the income tax provision on income from continuing operations at the federal
statutory income tax rate and the tax provision shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for
the periods shown below are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

Tax at statutory rate of 35% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign rate differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Domestic manufacturing deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other—net

$293,129
4,042
(50,314)
(29,685)
(17,832)
9,549

$268,841
2,677
(43,565)
(30,079)
(16,902)
730

$222,888
4,931
—
(14,332)
(17,834)
(6,041)

Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$208,889

$181,702

$189,612

The components of the deferred taxes consist of the following at September 30 (in thousands):

2017

2016

Deferred tax liabilities:

Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unremitted foreign earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee benefits, compensation and other accrued obligations . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swaps and caps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Environmental
Product warranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(647,140)
(29,240)
(10,784)
107,195
31,077
33,462
15,961
15,518
7,419
8,797

$(627,633)
(31,438)
(9,434)
86,229
22,382
29,266
36,478
16,958
9,007
3,216

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Add: Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(467,735)
(33,214)

(464,969)
(27,286)

Total net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(500,949)

$(492,255)

At September 30, 2017, the Company has United Kingdom net operating loss carryforwards of

approximately $23.3 million, German net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $4.3 million and state

F-23

net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $819.5 million that expire in various years from 2017 to 2034.
A valuation allowance has been established equal to the amount of the net operating losses that the Company
believes will not be utilized. The Company had state tax credit carryforwards of $2.6 million that expire from
2023 to 2029.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state

and local jurisdictions, as well as foreign jurisdictions located in Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany,
Hong Kong, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The
Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years before fiscal 2014. The Company is
currently under examination in the U.S. for its fiscal 2014 federal taxes. The Company expects the examinations
to be completed during fiscal 2018. In addition, the Company is subject to state income tax examinations for
fiscal years 2009 and later.

The cumulative amount of the Company’s foreign undistributed net earnings for which no deferred taxes

have been provided is approximately $176.0 million at September 30, 2017. The Company has no plans to
repatriate such earnings in the foreseeable future.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in

thousands):

Balance at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions based on tax positions related to the prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lapse in statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2017

2016

$ 8,706
500
1,643
(963)
(1,231)
—

$ 6,859
2,014
913
(801)
(1,483)
1,204

Balance at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 8,655

$ 8,706

Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2017 and 2016, the recognition of which would have an effect

on the effective tax rate for each fiscal year, amounted to $8.7 million in each period. The Company classifies all
income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense, which were not significant for the years ended
September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015. As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued $1.2 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties. The Company anticipates no
significant changes to its total unrecognized tax benefits through fiscal 2017.

14. ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES

Our operations and facilities are subject to a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws
and regulations that govern, among other things, discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the generation,
handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the remediation of contamination and the
health and safety of our employees. Environmental laws and regulations may require that the Company
investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. Certain facilities and third-party sites utilized by the Company have been identified as
potentially responsible parties under the federal superfund laws and comparable state laws. The Company is
currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under applicable laws.

Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations and
technology. These estimates take into consideration the Company’s prior experience and professional judgment
of the Company’s environmental advisors. Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are further
subject to uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of site contamination, the range of remediation

F-24

alternatives available, evolving remediation standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost estimates, the
extent of corrective actions that may be required and the number and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.

Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in the Company’s

accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such adjustments could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in a given period. Based on
currently available information, however, the Company does not believe that future environmental costs in
excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which the Company has been identified as a potentially
responsible party are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable,

which generally is not later than at completion of a feasibility study or when the Company has recommended a
remedy or has committed to an appropriate plan of action. The Company also takes into consideration the
estimated period of time in which payments will be required. The liabilities are reviewed periodically and, as
investigation and remediation proceed, adjustments are made as necessary. Liabilities for losses from
environmental remediation obligations do not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are
not discounted to their present value. The liabilities are not offset by possible recoveries from insurance carriers
or other third parties, but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal
superfund sites or similar state-managed sites, third party indemnity obligations, and an assessment of the
likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites.

The Company’s consolidated balance sheets includes environmental remediation obligations at

September 30, 2017 and 2016 of $39.9 million and $46.1 million, respectively.

15. CAPITAL STOCK

TD Group consists of 224,400,000 shares of $.01 par value common stock and 149,600,000 shares of $.01
par value preferred stock. The total number of shares of common stock issued at September 30, 2017 and 2016
was 56,093,659 and 55,767,767, respectively. The total number of shares held in treasury at September 30, 2017
and 2016 were 4,159,207 and 2,433,035, respectively. There were no shares of preferred stock outstanding at
September 30, 2017 and 2016. The terms of the preferred stock have not been established.

The Board of Directors has previously authorized a common share repurchase program, which has been

subject to amendments. On January 26, 2017, our Board of Directors increased the authorized amount of
repurchases allowable under the stock program from $450 million to $472 million. The increase in the allowable
repurchases under the stock repurchase program aligned the program with the restricted payments allowable
under the Credit Agreement. On March 7, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase
program replacing the $472 million program permitting repurchases of a portion of outstanding shares not to
exceed $600 million in the aggregate, subject to any restrictions specified in the Credit Agreement and/or
Indentures governing the existing Notes.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, in the aggregate, the Company repurchased 1,723,624

shares at a cost of $389.8 million at the weighted average cost of $226.16 under its stock repurchase programs.

As of September 30, 2017, the remaining amount of repurchases allowable under the $600 million program
was $360.2 million subject to any restrictions specified in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures governing the
existing Notes.

On November 8, 2017, our Board of Directors, authorized a new stock repurchase program replacing the

$600 million program permitting repurchases of our outstanding shares not to exceed $650 million in the
aggregate, subject to any restrictions specified in the Credit Agreement and/or Indentures governing the existing
Notes.

F-25

16. SEGMENTS

The Company’s businesses are organized and managed in three reporting segments: Power & Control,

Airframe and Non-aviation.

The Power & Control segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market systems and

components that predominately provide power to or control power of the aircraft utilizing electronic, fluid, power
and mechanical motion control technologies. Major product offerings include mechanical/electro-mechanical
actuators and controls, ignition systems and engine technology, specialized pumps and valves, power
conditioning devices, specialized AC/DC electric motors and generators, databus and power controls, high
performance hoists, winches and lifting devices and cargo loading and handling systems. Primary customers of
this segment are engine and power system and subsystem suppliers, airlines, third party maintenance suppliers,
military buying agencies and repair depots. Products are sold in the original equipment and aftermarket market
channels.

The Airframe segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market systems and

components that are used in non-power airframe applications utilizing airframe and cabin structure technologies.
Major product offerings include engineered latching and locking devices, rods and locking devices, engineered
connectors and elastomers, cockpit security components and systems, aircraft audio systems, specialized lavatory
components, seat belts and safety restraints, engineered interior surfaces and related components, lighting and
control technology, military personnel parachutes and cargo delivery systems. Primary customers of this segment
are airframe manufacturers and cabin system suppliers and subsystem suppliers, airlines, third party maintenance
suppliers, military buying agencies and repair depots. Products are sold in the original equipment and aftermarket
market channels.

The Non-aviation segment includes operations that primarily develop, produce and market products for

non-aviation markets. Major product offerings include seat belts and safety restraints for ground transportation
applications, mechanical/electro-mechanical actuators and controls for space applications, and refueling systems
for heavy equipment used in mining, construction and other industries. Primary customers of this segment are
off-road vehicle suppliers and subsystem suppliers, child restraint system suppliers, satellite and space system
suppliers and manufacturers of heavy equipment used in mining, construction and other industries.

The primary measurement used by management to review and assess the operating performance of each

segment is EBITDA As Defined. The Company defines EBITDA As Defined as earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization plus certain non-operating items recorded as corporate expenses including
refinancing costs, acquisition-related costs, transaction-related costs and non-cash compensation charges incurred
in connection with the Company’s stock option plans. Acquisition-related costs represent accounting adjustments
to inventory associated with acquisitions of businesses and product lines that were charged to cost of sales when
the inventory was sold; costs incurred to integrate acquired businesses and product lines into the Company’s
operations, facility relocation costs and other acquisition-related costs; transaction related costs comprising deal
fees; legal, financial and tax diligence expenses and valuation costs that are required to be expensed as incurred
and other acquisition accounting adjustments.

EBITDA As Defined is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP. Although the Company

uses EBITDA As Defined to assess the performance of its business and for various other purposes, the use of this
non-GAAP financial measure as an analytical tool has limitations, and it should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s results of operations as reported in accordance with GAAP.

The Company’s segments are reported on the same basis used internally for evaluating performance and for
allocating resources. The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales and
transfers are recorded at values based on market prices, which creates intercompany profit on intersegment sales
or transfers that is eliminated in consolidation. Intersegment sales were insignificant for the periods presented
below. Certain corporate-level expenses are allocated to the operating segments.

F-26

The following table presents net sales by reportable segment (in thousands):

Net sales to external customers
Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

$1,948,166
1,442,073
114,047

$1,621,741
1,447,894
101,776

$1,330,135
1,280,706
96,274

$3,504,286

$3,171,411

$2,707,115

The following table reconciles EBITDA As Defined by segment to consolidated income from continuing

operations before income taxes (in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

EBITDA As Defined
Power & Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total segment EBITDA As Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unallocated corporate expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 981,041
726,619
41,460

1,749,120
38,557

$ 787,418
709,858
28,228

1,525,504
30,308

$ 653,050
585,472
22,406

1,260,928
27,274

Total Company EBITDA As Defined . . . . . . . . . . .

1,710,563

1,495,196

1,233,654

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net
Acquisition-related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Refinancing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing operations before income
taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141,025
602,589
31,191
45,524
39,807
12,997

121,670
483,850
57,699
48,306
15,794
(239)

93,663
418,785
36,205
31,500
18,393
(1,716)

$ 837,430

$ 768,116

$ 636,824

The following table presents capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization by segment (in

thousands):

Capital expenditures
Power & Control
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Depreciation and amortization
Power & Control
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-27

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
2015
2016
2017

$ 32,424
34,526
3,981
82

$ 25,120
16,498
2,169
195

$24,664
28,086
1,889
232

$ 71,013

$ 43,982

$54,871

$ 85,681
51,440
2,745
1,159

$ 65,488
52,198
2,860
1,124

$39,336
50,355
2,846
1,126

$141,025

$121,670

$93,663

The following table presents total assets by segment (in thousands):

Total assets
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power & Control
Airframe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-aviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

$5,218,006
3,923,172
142,389
614,594
77,500

$9,975,661

$ 5,184,303
3,922,532
131,319
1,488,123
—

$10,726,277

The Company’s sales principally originate from the United States, and the Company’s long-lived assets are

principally located in the United States.

17. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company’s stock compensation plans are designed to assist the Company in attracting, retaining,
motivating and rewarding key employees, directors or consultants, and promoting the creation of long-term value
for stockholders by closely aligning the interests of these individuals with those of the Company’s stockholders.
The Company’s stock compensation plans provide for the granting of stock options, restricted stock and other
stock-based incentives.

Non-cash stock compensation expense recognized by the Company during the years ended September 30,

2017, 2016 and 2015 was $45.5 million, $48.3 million and $31.5 million, respectively.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended September 30,

2017, 2016 and 2015 was $67.11, $57.47 and $65.57, respectively.

Compensation expense is recognized based upon probability assessments of awards that are expected to vest
in future periods. Such probability assessments are subject to revision and, therefore, unrecognized compensation
expense is subject to future changes in estimate. As of September 30, 2017, there was approximately
$52.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards expected to vest, which
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

The fair value of the Company’s employee stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-
Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for all options granted
during the fiscal years ended:

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2015

Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life of options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield of stock . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility of stock . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.56% to 2.01% 1.33% to 1.73% 1.33% to 1.64%
5 years
—
25%

5 years
—
35%

5 years
—
25%

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the Treasury bond rates as of the grant date. The average expected

life of stock-based awards is based on the Company’s actual historical exercise experience. Expected volatility of
stock was calculated using a rate based upon the historical volatility of TransDigm’s common stock.
Notwithstanding the special cash dividends declared and paid from time to time, the Company historically has
not declared and paid regular cash dividends and does not anticipate declaring and paying regular cash dividends
in future periods; thus, no dividend rate assumption is used.

F-28

The total fair value of options vested during fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was

$42.9 million, $36.6 million and $14.9 million, respectively.

2014 Stock Option Plan

In July 2014, the Board of Directors of TD Group adopted a new stock option plan, which was subsequently

approved by stockholders on October 2, 2014. The 2014 stock option plan permits TD Group to award our key
employees, directors or consultants stock options. The total number of shares of TD Group common stock
reserved for issuance or delivery under the 2014 stock option plan is 5,000,000, subject to adjustment in the event
of any stock dividend or split, reorganization, recapitalization, merger, share exchange or any other similar
corporate transaction or event.

Performance Vested Stock Options—All of the options granted through September 30, 2017 under the 2014
stock option plan have been pursuant to an equity incentive program adopted by the Company in 2008. Under the
2008 equity incentive program, all of the options granted will vest based on the Company’s achievement of
established operating performance goals. The following table summarizes the activity, pricing and other
information for the Company’s performance vested stock-based award activity during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017:

Outstanding at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of
Options

147,935
738,974
(930)
(23,280)
(640)

Outstanding at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . .

862,059

Expected to vest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

397,725

Exercisable at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . .

122,975

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Per
Option

Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

$228.73
266.18
231.16
251.79
232.64

$260.20

$260.33

$246.01

9.0 years

$(3,925,661)

9.0 years

$(1,861,447)

8.8 years

$ 1,186,026

At September 30, 2017, there were 4,137,011 remaining shares available for award under TD Group’s 2014

stock option plan.

2006 Stock Incentive Plan

In conjunction with the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering, a 2006 stock incentive plan
was adopted by TD Group. In July 2008 and March 2011, the plan was amended to increase the number of shares
available for issuance thereunder. TD Group reserved 8,119,668 shares of its common stock for issuance to key
employees, directors or consultants under the plan. Awards under the plan may be in the form of options,
restricted stock or other stock-based awards. Options granted under the plan will expire no later than the tenth
anniversary of the applicable date of grant of the options, and will have an exercise price of not less than the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock granted under the plan vests over three
years.

Restricted Stock—The Company granted 17,700 restricted stock units with a weighted-average grant date

fair value of $189.97 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017, 5,900 restricted stock units vested, and 5,900 restricted stock units were outstanding at
September 30, 2017.

Performance Vested Stock Options—All of the options granted under the 2006 stock incentive plan have

been pursuant to an equity incentive program adopted by the Company in 2008. Under the 2008 equity incentive

F-29

program, all of the options granted will vest based on the Company’s achievement of established operating
performance goals. The following table summarizes the activity, pricing and other information for the
Company’s performance vested stock-based award activity during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:

Number of
Options

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Per
Option

Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . 5,239,871
—

Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(315,478)
(138,179)
(100)

$133.20

—
66.67
188.90
226.34

Outstanding at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . 4,786,114

$135.95

5.2 years

$572,875,252

Expected to vest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,052,250

$200.32

7.4 years

$ 58,217,596

Exercisable at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . 3,464,551

$110.36

4.3 years

$503,350,041

The 2006 stock incentive plan expired on March 14, 2016 and no further shares were granted under the plan

thereafter.

2003 Stock Option Plan

Certain executives and key employees of the Company were granted stock options under TD Group’s 2003

stock option plan. Upon the closing of the acquisition of the Company by Warburg Pincus in 2003, certain
employees rolled over certain then-existing options to purchase shares of common stock of TransDigm Holdings.
These employees were granted rollover options to purchase an aggregate of 3,870,152 shares of common stock of
TD Group (after giving effect to the 149.60 for 1.00 stock split effected on March 14, 2006). All rollover options
granted were fully vested on the date of grant. In addition to shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of rollover options, an aggregate of 5,469,301 shares of TD Group’s common stock were reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of new management options. In general, approximately 20% of all new
management options vested based on employment service or a change in control. These time vested options had a
graded vesting schedule of up to four years. Approximately 80% of all new management options vested (i) based
upon the satisfaction of specified performance criteria, which is annual and cumulative EBITDA As Defined
targets through 2008, or (ii) upon the occurrence of a change in control if the Investor Group (defined as
Warburg Pincus and the other initial investors in TD Group) received a minimum specified rate of return. Unless
terminated earlier, the options expire ten years from the date of grant.

TD Group reserved a total of 9,339,453 shares of its common stock for issuance to the Company’s

employees under the plan, which had all been issued as of September 30, 2013.

Time Vested Stock Options—During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, 5,486 of the Company’s
time vested stock-based options, with a weighted-average exercise price per option of $39.88, were exercised.
There were no remaining options outstanding as of September 30, 2016.

F-30

Performance Vested Stock Options—The following table summarizes the activity, pricing and other

information for the Company’s performance vested stock-based award activity during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017:

Outstanding at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Number of
Options

86,329
—
(8,500)

Outstanding at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . .

77,829

Exercisable at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . .

77,829

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Per
Option

Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

$120.72
—
34.88

$130.09

$130.09

5.1 years

$9,772,209

5.1 years

$9,772,209

The total intrinsic value of time, performance and rollover options exercised during the fiscal years ended

September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $61.1 million, $133.2 million and $206.9 million, respectively.

In addition to shares issued pursuant to options exercised, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,
984 shares of common stock were issued with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $243.36 as payment to
directors in lieu of cash.

Dividend Equivalent Plans

Pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated TransDigm Group Incorporated 2003 Stock Option Plan
Dividend Equivalent Plan, the Second Amended and Restated TransDigm Group Incorporated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan Dividend Equivalent Plan and the 2014 Stock Option Plan Dividend Equivalent Plan, all of the
options granted under the 2003 stock option plan, the 2006 stock incentive plan and the 2014 stock option plan
are entitled to certain dividend equivalent payments in the event of the declaration of a dividend by the
Company.

Dividend equivalent payments on vested options were $19.5 million, $3.0 million and $3.4 million during

the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the first quarter of 2017, in connection
with the special dividend declared in October 2016, we paid $1,280.1 million for the special dividend and
$76.4 million for the related dividend equivalent payments. During the fourth quarter of 2017, in connection with
the special dividend declared in August 2017, we paid $1,142.2 million for the special dividend and
$63.3 million for the related dividend equivalent payments. At September 30, 2017, there was $56.5 million
recorded in accrued liabilities and $39.4 million accrued in other non-current liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheets related to the future dividend equivalent payments.

18. LEASES

TransDigm leases certain manufacturing facilities, offices, equipment and vehicles. Such leases, some of
which are noncancelable and, in many cases, include renewals, expire at various dates. Rental expense during the
years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $19.0 million, $18.3 million and $14.0 million,
respectively.

Future minimum rental commitments at September 30, 2017 under operating leases having initial or

remaining non-cancelable lease terms exceeding one year are $18.0 million in fiscal 2018, $17.5 million in fiscal
2019, $14.6 million in fiscal 2020, $12.6 million in fiscal 2021, $11.5 million in fiscal 2022, and $33.6 million
thereafter.

F-31

19. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and
are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of
the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than
quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is
determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments (in thousands):

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

Level

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate cap agreements(1)
Interest rate swap agreements(1) . . . . . . . . . . . .

Liabilities:

Interest rate swap agreements(2) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest rate swap agreements(3) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings—trade receivable

securitization facility(4)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Long-term debt, including current portion:

Term loans(4)
2020 Notes(4)
2021 Notes(4)
2022 Notes(4)
2024 Notes(4)
2025 Notes(4)
2026 Notes(4)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1
2
2

2
2

1

2
1
1
1
1
1
1

$ 650,561 $ 650,561
12,904
2,905

12,904
2,905

$1,586,994
4,232
—

$1,586,994
4,232
—

20,740
9,731

20,740
9,731

29,191
53,824

29,191
53,824

299,587

299,587

199,771

199,771

6,889,957
546,757
—
1,143,059
1,191,958
750,149
941,194

6,965,628
558,250
—

1,178,750
1,236,000
776,807
971,375

5,234,607
545,701
496,859
1,141,619
1,190,782
445,856
940,412

5,284,037
566,500
530,000
1,214,688
1,266,000
469,125
985,625

Included in other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
Included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Included in other non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) The carrying amount of the debt instrument is presented net of the debt issuance costs.

The Company values its financial instruments using an industry standard market approach, in which prices

and other relevant information is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or
liabilities. No financial instruments were recognized using unobservable inputs.

Interest rate swaps were measured at fair value using quoted market prices for the swap interest rate indexes
over the term of the swap discounted to present value versus the fixed rate of the contract. The interest rate caps
were measured at fair value using implied volatility rates of each individual caplet and the yield curve for the
related periods. The estimated fair value of the Company’s term loans was based on information provided by the
agent under the Company’s senior secured credit facility. The estimated fair values of the Company’s notes were
based upon quoted market prices. There has not been any impact to the fair value of derivative liabilities due to
the Company’s own credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any impact to the fair value of derivative assets
based on the Company’s evaluation of counterparties’ credit risks.

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable-net and accounts payable

approximated book value due to the short-term nature of these instruments at September 30, 2017 and 2016.

F-32

20. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company is exposed to, among other things, the impact of changes in interest rates in the normal course
of business. The Company’s risk management program is designed to manage the exposure and volatility arising
from these risks, and utilizes derivative financial instruments to offset a portion of these risks. The Company uses
derivative financial instruments only to the extent necessary to hedge identified business risks and does not enter
into such transactions for trading purposes. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security
with counterparties to these financial instruments and is therefore subject to credit risk in the event of
nonperformance; however, the Company monitors credit risk and currently does not anticipate nonperformance
by other parties. The Company has agreements with each of its swap and cap counterparties that contain a
provision whereby if the Company defaults on the credit facility the Company could also be declared in default
on its swaps and caps, resulting in an acceleration of payment under the swaps and caps.

Interest rate swap and cap agreements are used to manage interest rate risk associated with floating-rate

borrowings under our credit facility. The interest rate swap and cap agreements utilized by the Company
effectively modify the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of the Company’s
floating-rate debt to a fixed rate basis through the expiration date of the interest rate swap and cap agreements,
thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. These agreements involve the
receipt of floating rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments over the term of the agreements
without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. These derivative instruments qualify as effective cash
flow hedges under GAAP. For these cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss from the financial
instruments was initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’
deficit and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same line as the hedged item in the same period or
periods during which the hedged item affected earnings.

The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap agreements:

Aggregate
Notional Amount
(in millions)

Start Date

End Date

Related Debt

Conversion of Related Variable Rate Debt to Fixed
Rate of:

6/30/2019 Tranche G Term Loans 5.4% (2.4% plus the 3% margin percentage)
$1,000 . . . . . . . . . 9/30/2014
9/30/2022 Tranche G Term Loans 4.9% (1.9% plus the 3% margin percentage)
$400 . . . . . . . . . . 9/30/2017
$750 . . . . . . . . . . 6/30/2020
6/30/2022 Tranche F Term Loans 5.5% (2.5% plus the 3% margin percentage)
$500 . . . . . . . . . . 12/30/2016 12/31/2021 Tranche F Term Loans 4.9% (1.9% plus the 3% margin percentage)
6/30/2021 Tranche F Term Loans 4.8% (1.8% plus the 3% margin percentage)
$1,000 . . . . . . . . . 6/28/2019
6/30/2020 Tranche D Term Loans 5.8% (2.8% plus the 3% margin percentage)
$750 . . . . . . . . . . 3/31/2016

The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate cap agreements:

Aggregate
Notional Amount
(in millions)

Start Date

End Date

Related Debt

Offsets Variable Rate Debt
Attributable to Fluctuations
Above:

$750 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6/30/2020
$400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/30/2016
6/30/2016
$400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9/30/2015
$750 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6/30/2022
Tranche F Term Loans Three month LIBO rate of 2.5%
12/31/2021 Tranche F Term Loans Three month LIBO rate of 2.5%
Tranche F Term Loans Three month LIBO rate of 2.0%
6/30/2021
Tranche E Term Loans Three month LIBO rate of 2.5%
6/30/2020

All interest rate swap and cap agreements are recognized in our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. In
accordance with GAAP, certain derivative asset and liability balances are offset where master netting agreements
provide for the legal right of setoff. For classification purposes, we record the net fair value of each type of
derivative position that is expected to settle in less than one year with each counterparty as a net current asset or
liability and each type of long-term position as a net long-term asset or liability. The amounts shown in the table

F-33

below represent the gross amounts of recognized assets and liabilities, the amounts offset in the consolidated
balance sheet and the net amounts of assets and liabilities presented therein.

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

Asset

Liability

Asset

Liability

Interest rate cap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,904 $ — $4,232 $ —
Interest rate swap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(36,801) — (83,015)

9,235

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of counterparty netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,139
(6,330)

(36,801)
6,330

4,232
—

(83,015)
—

Net derivatives as classified in the balance sheet(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . $15,809 $(30,471) $4,232

$(83,015)

(1) Refer to Note 19, “Fair Value Measurements,” for the consolidated balance sheet classification of our

interest rate swap and cap agreements.

In connection with the refinancing of the 2011 Term Loans, the Company no longer designated the interest
rate swap agreements relating to the $353 million aggregate notional amount as cash flow hedges for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, amounts previously recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholder’s deficit amortized into earnings totaled $3.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.
There was no remaining amortization for these dedesignated swap agreements as of September 30, 2015.

Based on the fair value amounts of the interest rate swap and cap agreements determined as of

September 30, 2017, the estimated net amount of existing gains and losses and caplet amortization expected to be
reclassified into interest expense within the next twelve months is approximately $24.9 million.

Effective September 30, 2016, the Company redesignated the interest rate cap agreements related to the
$400 million and the $750 million aggregate notional amount with cap rates of 2.0% and 2.5%, respectively,
based on the expected probable cash flows associated with the 2016 term loans and 2015 term loans in
consideration of the Company’s ability to select one-month, two-month, three-month, or six-month LIBO rate set
forth in the Credit Agreement. Accordingly, amounts previously recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss in stockholder’s deficit amortized into interest expense was $3.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2017. The accumulated other comprehensive loss to be reclassified into interest expense
over the remaining term of the cap agreements is $10.8 million with a related tax benefit of $4.0 million as of
September 30, 2017. The amount recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholders’ deficit related to these redesignated interest rate cap hedges as of September 30, 2016 was
approximately $14.6 million with a related tax benefit of $5.5 million.

F-34

21. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table presents the components of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” (“AOCI”) in the

consolidated balance sheets, net of taxes, for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Balance at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification . . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from AOCI related to interest rate

Unrealized (loss)
gain on derivatives
designated and
qualifying as cash
flow hedges(2)

Defined
benefit
pension
plan
activity(3)

Currency
translation
adjustment

Total

$(51,492)
(9,664)

$(12,013) $(32,504) $ (96,009)
(53,794)
(31,846)
(12,284)

swap agreements(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16

—

—

16

Net current-period other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . .

(9,648)

(12,284)

(31,846)

(53,778)

Balance at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive gain before reclassification . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from AOCI related to interest rate

swap agreements(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net current-period other comprehensive gain . . . . . . . . . . .

(61,140)
32,072

(24,297)
7,932

(64,350)
22,241

(149,787)
62,245

2,399

34,471

—

—

2,399

7,932

22,241

64,644

Balance at September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(26,669)

$(16,365) $(42,109) $ (85,143)

(1) This component of AOCI is included in interest expense (see Note 20, “Derivatives and Hedging

Activities,” for additional details).

(2) Unrealized (loss) gain represents interest rate swap and cap agreements, net of taxes of $(20,663), $6,868

and $20,716 for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(3) Defined benefit pension plan activity represent pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of $(4,130),

$6,017 and $3,299, respectively.

A summary of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for or the years ended

September 30, 2017 is provided below (in thousands):

Description of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss

Amount
reclassified

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization from redesignated interest rate cap agreements(1)
Deferred tax benefit from redesignated interest rate cap agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 3,829
(1,430)

Losses reclassified into earnings, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,399

(1) This component of accumulated other comprehensive loss is included in interest expense (see Note 20,

“Derivatives and Hedging Activity,” for additional information).

22. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In connection with the settlement of a Department of Justice investigation into the competitive effects of the

acquisition, during the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company committed to dispose of the Schroth business.
Therefore, Schroth was classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2017. The results of operations of Schroth
are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods
presented. The Company previously acquired Schroth in February 2017 (refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions”). Schroth
designs and manufactures proprietary, highly engineered, advanced safety systems for aviation, racing and
military ground vehicles around the world.

The loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income includes a $32.0 million

impairment charge to write down the Schroth assets to fair value. The impairment charge recorded in the fourth

F-35

quarter of 2017 was based on an internal assessment of the recovery of Schroth’s assets. Schroth’s assets have
been recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2017. The following is the
summarized operating results from the date of acquisition of February 22, 2017 to September 30, 2017 (in
thousands):

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 24,590
(5,709)
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(32,000)
Loss on classification as held-for-sale before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6,055
Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(31,654)

2017

At September 30, 2017, Schroth’s assets-held-for sale and liabilities held-for sale are $77.5 million and
$17.3 million, respectively. The following is the summarized balance sheet of Schroth’s assets and liabilities
held-for-sale as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):

Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations Held-for-Sale

Trade accounts receivable—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories—Net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other
Property, plant, and equipment—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets—Net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2017

$ 5,975
9,060
809
4,367
26,783
29,841
665

$77,500

$ 1,247
12,801
3,256

$17,304

F-36

23. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

First Quarter
Ended
December 31, 2016

Second Quarter
Ended
April 1, 2017

Third Quarter
Ended
July 1, 2017

Fourth Quarter
Ended
September 30, 2017

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Year Ended September 30, 2017(1)

Net sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations(2) . . . . .
. . . . .
Loss from discontinued operations(2)

$814,018
444,255
118,871

—

$868,728
489,437
155,691
(186)

$897,655
519,696
169,832
(779)

Net income(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$118,871

$155,505

$169,053

$923,885
531,239
184,147
(30,689)

$153,458

Net earnings per share from continuing
operations—basic and diluted(3)
Net loss per share from discontinued
operations—basic and diluted(3)

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

$

0.41

$

2.78

$

3.09

$

2.21

—

—

(0.01)

(0.56)

Net earnings per share—basic and

diluted(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.41

$

2.78

$

3.08

$

1.65

Year Ended September 30, 2016

Net sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net earnings per share—basic and

First Quarter
Ended
January 2, 2016

Second Quarter
Ended
April 2, 2016

Third Quarter
Ended
July 2, 2016

Fourth Quarter
Ended
September 30, 2016

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

$701,695
374,567
129,441

$796,801
425,662
141,683

$797,692
443,515
160,622

$875,223
484,319
154,668

diluted(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

2.23

$

2.52

$

2.88

$

2.77

(1) Results adjusted to reflect amounts reclassified to discontinued operations due to the Company’s

classification of Schroth as discontinued operations at September 30, 2017. See Note 22, “Discontinued
Operations,” for additional information.

(2) The Company’s operating results include the results of operations of acquisitions from the effective date of

each acquisition. See Note 2 “Acquisitions,” for additional details.

(3) The sum of the earnings per share for the four quarters in a year does not necessarily equal the total year

earnings per share.

24. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION

TransDigm’s 2020 Notes, 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes, 2025 Notes and 2026 Notes are jointly and severally

guaranteed, on a senior subordinated basis, by TD Group and TransDigm Inc.’s 100% Domestic Restricted
Subsidiaries, as defined in the Indentures. The following supplemental condensed consolidating financial
information presents, in separate columns, the balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2017 and
September 30, 2016 and its statements of income and cash flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017,
2016 and 2015 for (i) TransDigm Group on a parent only basis with its investment in subsidiaries recorded under
the equity method, (ii) TransDigm Inc. including its directly owned operations and non-operating entities,
(iii) the Subsidiary Guarantors on a combined basis, (iv) Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries and (v) the Company on a
consolidated basis.

Separate financial statements of TransDigm Inc. are not presented because TransDigm Inc.’s 2020 Notes,

2022 Notes, 2024 Notes, 2025 Notes and 2026 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior
subordinated basis by TD Group and all existing 100% owned domestic subsidiaries of TransDigm Inc. and
because TD Group has no significant operations or assets separate from its investment in TransDigm Inc.

F-37

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
(Amounts in Thousands)

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash

equivalents . . . . . . . . . . $

2,416 $

439,473 $

(203) $ 208,875 $

— $

650,561

Trade accounts

receivable—Net . . . . . .
Inventories—Net
. . . . . . .
Assets held-for-sale . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and

other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current

—
—
—

—

—
47,051
—

25,069
571,712
6,428

652,807
114,018
71,072

(41,749)
(2,100)
—

636,127
730,681
77,500

4,746

24,141

9,796

—

38,683

assets . . . . . . . . . .

2,416

491,270

627,147

1,056,568

(43,849) 2,133,552

INVESTMENT IN

SUBSIDIARIES AND
INTERCOMPANY
BALANCES . . . . . . . . . . . .

PROPERTY, PLANT AND

EQUIPMENT—Net . . . . . . .
GOODWILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER INTANGIBLE

(2,953,620) 10,263,999

7,599,210

966,675

(15,876,264)

—

—
—

16,032
85,905

261,434
4,996,034

47,458
663,399

—
324,924
— 5,745,338

— 1,717,862
ASSETS—Net . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53,985
—
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . $(2,951,204)$10,905,142 $14,949,398 $2,992,438 $(15,920,113)$ 9,975,661

1,438,006
27,567

252,236
6,102

27,620
20,316

—
—

LIABILITIES AND

STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Current portion of long-

term debt

. . . . . . . . . . . $

— $

69,454 $

— $

— $

— $

69,454

Short-term borrowings—

trade receivable
securitization facility . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . .
Liabilities held-for-sale . .

Total current

liabilities . . . . . . . .
LONG-TERM DEBT . . . . . . . .
DEFERRED INCOME

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OTHER NON-CURRENT

LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . .

STOCKHOLDERS’

—
—
—
—

—
14,712
180,916
—

—
137,948
103,902
—

299,587
37,667
51,070
17,304

—
(41,566)
—
—

299,587
148,761
335,888
17,304

—
265,082
— 11,393,620

241,850
—

405,628
—

(41,566)

870,994
— 11,393,620

—

442,415

(99)

58,633

—

500,949

—
61,347
— 12,162,464

73,245
314,996

26,710
490,971

—

161,302
(41,566) 12,926,865

(DEFICIT) EQUITY . . . . . .

(2,951,204)

(1,257,322) 14,634,402

2,501,467

(15,878,547) (2,951,204)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND

STOCKHOLDERS’
(DEFICIT) EQUITY . . . . . . $(2,951,204)$10,905,142 $14,949,398 $2,992,438 $(15,920,113)$ 9,975,661

F-38

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
(Amounts in Thousands)

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash

equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,560 $ 1,421,251 $

8,808 $ 143,375 $

— $ 1,586,994

Trade accounts

receivable—Net

Inventories—Net
Prepaid expenses and

. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

—
—

—
42,309

other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . .

—
13,560

8,209
1,471,769

26,210
586,648

27,381
649,047

561,124
96,229

7,763
808,491

(10,995)
(1,175)

576,339
724,011

—
(12,170)

43,353
2,930,697

INVESTMENT IN

SUBSIDIARIES AND
INTERCOMPANY
BALANCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PROPERTY, PLANT AND

EQUIPMENT—Net . . . . . . . .
GOODWILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER INTANGIBLE

(665,050)

9,671,019

6,182,809

861,647

(16,050,425)

—

—
—

15,991
68,593

250,544
4,952,950

44,045
657,909

310,580
—
— 5,679,452

ASSETS—Net

— 1,764,343
. . . . . . . . . . . .
41,205
—
OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . $(651,490)$11,262,492 $13,542,698 $2,635,172 $(16,062,595)$10,726,277

1,483,285
24,063

256,257
6,823

24,801
10,319

—
—

LIABILITIES AND

STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Current portion of long-

term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

— $

52,645 $

— $

— $

— $

52,645

Short-term borrowings—

trade receivable
securitization facility . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . .

Total current

liabilities . . . . . . . . .
LONG-TERM DEBT . . . . . . . . .
DEFERRED INCOME

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OTHER NON-CURRENT

LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . .
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)
EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND

—
—
—

—
15,347
159,909

—
120,455
123,646

199,771
31,560
60,557

—
(11,287)
—

199,771
156,075
344,112

—
227,901
— 9,943,191

244,101
—

291,888
—

(11,287)

752,603
— 9,943,191

—

434,013

(544)

58,786

—

492,255

—
82,677
— 10,687,782

70,124
313,681

36,917
387,591

—

189,718
(11,287) 11,377,767

(651,490)

574,710 13,229,017

2,247,581

(16,051,308)

(651,490)

STOCKHOLDERS’
(DEFICIT) EQUITY . . . . . . . $(651,490)$11,262,492 $13,542,698 $2,635,172 $(16,062,595)$10,726,277

F-39

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)

NET SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
COST OF SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— $
—

143,631 $2,911,950
79,403 1,191,770

$535,129
333,985

$

(86,424) $3,504,286
(85,499) 1,519,659

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

—

64,228 1,720,180

201,144

(925) 1,984,627

GROSS PROFIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SELLING AND

ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

AMORTIZATION OF

69

97,677

284,819

33,010

—

—

415,575

89,226

INTANGIBLE ASSETS . . . . . . .

—

1,003

80,053

8,170

(LOSS) INCOME FROM

OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(69)

(34,452) 1,355,308

159,964

(925) 1,479,826

INTEREST EXPENSE
(INCOME)—Net

. . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFINANCING COSTS . . . . . . . . .
EQUITY IN INCOME OF

—
—

614,353
39,807

(1,248)
—

(10,516)
—

—
—

602,589
39,807

SUBSIDIARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(596,956) (1,318,945)

—

—

1,915,901

—

INCOME FROM CONTINUING

OPERATIONS BEFORE
INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING

596,887
—

630,333 1,356,556
156,251
33,377

170,480
19,261

(1,916,826)

—

837,430
208,889

OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

596,887

596,956 1,200,305

151,219

(1,916,826)

628,541

LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED

OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX . .

—

—

(9,496)

(22,158)

—

(31,654)

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 596,887 $

596,956 $1,190,809

$129,061

$(1,916,826) $ 596,887

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS), NET OF
TAX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE

64,644

31,603

16,310

58,856

(106,769)

64,644

INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 661,531 $

628,559 $1,207,119

$187,917

$(2,023,595) $ 661,531

F-40

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
(Amounts in Thousands)

NET SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
COST OF SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— $
—

132,407 $2,580,091
75,521 1,105,893

$486,198
289,219

$

(27,285)$3,171,411
(27,285) 1,443,348

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

GROSS PROFIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SELLING AND

ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

AMORTIZATION OF

INTANGIBLE ASSETS . . . . . . . .

(LOSS) INCOME FROM

OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INTEREST EXPENSE

(INCOME)—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFINANCING COSTS . . . . . . . . .
EQUITY IN INCOME OF

—

—

—

—

—
—

56,886 1,474,198

196,979

— 1,728,063

114,546

210,209

58,103

684

65,299

11,462

—

—

382,858

77,445

(58,344) 1,198,690

127,414

— 1,267,760

490,974
15,794

259
—

—

(7,383)
—

—
—

483,850
15,794

—

1,630,785

—

SUBSIDIARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(586,414) (1,044,371)

INCOME BEFORE INCOME

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

586,414

479,259 1,198,431

134,797

(1,630,785)

768,116

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT)

PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

(107,155)

285,887

2,970

—

181,702

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 586,414 $

586,414 $ 912,544

$131,827

$(1,630,785)$ 586,414

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
(LOSS) INCOME, NET OF
TAX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE

(53,778)

6,381

(9,598)

(39,461)

42,678

(53,778)

INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 532,636 $

592,795 $ 902,946

$ 92,366

$(1,588,107)$ 532,636

F-41

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(Amounts in Thousands)

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries

Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

NET SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
COST OF SALES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— $ 131,378 $2,262,842
973,908
—

79,174

$324,675
215,968

$

(11,780)$2,707,115
(11,780) 1,257,270

GROSS PROFIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE
ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(LOSS) INCOME FROM

—

—

—

52,204 1,288,934

108,707

— 1,449,845

72,792

197,914

50,918

1,392

45,337

7,490

—

—

321,624

54,219

OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (21,980) 1,045,683

50,299

— 1,074,002

INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)—

Net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFINANCING COSTS . . . . . . . . . . .
EQUITY IN INCOME OF

— 430,224
18,393
—

(487)
—

(10,952)
—

—
—

418,785
18,393

SUBSIDIARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(447,212) (773,510)

—

—

1,220,722

—

INCOME BEFORE INCOME

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

447,212

302,913 1,046,170

61,251

(1,220,722)

636,824

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT)

PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (144,299)

315,017

18,894

—

189,612

NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 447,212 $ 447,212 $ 731,153

$ 42,357

$(1,220,722)$ 447,212

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)

INCOME, NET OF TAX . . . . . . . . .

(70,838)

(55,338)

770

(29,147)

83,715

(70,838)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE

INCOME (LOSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 376,374 $ 391,874 $ 731,923

$ 13,210

$(1,137,007)$ 376,374

F-42

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor

Subsidiaries Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

NET CASH (USED IN)

PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Capital expenditures . . . . . . .
Acquisition of business, net

of cash acquired . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Schroth, net of
cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash used in

investing activities . . .

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Intercompany activities . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of

stock options . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock purchased . . .
Proceeds from term loans,

net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment on term loans . . .
Cash tender and redemption
of senior subordinated
notes due 2021, including
premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Proceeds from senior

subordinated notes, net

. . .

Proceeds from trade

receivable securitization
facility, net . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing fees and other . . . .

Net cash (used in)

provided by financing
activities . . . . . . . . . . .

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE
CHANGES ON CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . . . .

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE

IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . .

CASH AND CASH

EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CASH AND CASH

EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

(69)$ (587,800)$ 1,334,099

$ 42,028

$ 475

$

788,733

—

—

—

—

(1,984)

(63,305)

(5,724)

(136,295)

(79,695)

—

—

—

—

(217,974)

(63,305)

(5,724)

—

—

—

—

(71,013)

(136,295)

(79,695)

(287,003)

2,939,121 (1,682,518) (1,279,805)

23,677

(475)

—

21,177
(2,581,552)
(389,821)

—
—
—

— 2,937,773
— (1,284,698)

—

—

—
—

(528,847)

300,386

99,471
(17,571)

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

21,177
(2,581,552)
(389,821)

2,937,773
(1,284,698)

(528,847)

300,386

99,471
(17,571)

(11,075)

(176,004) (1,279,805)

23,677

(475)

(1,443,682)

—

—

—

5,519

(11,144)

(981,778)

(9,011)

65,500

13,560

1,421,251

8,808

143,375

—

—

—

5,519

(936,433)

1,586,994

2,416 $

439,473 $

(203) $208,875

$ — $

650,561

F-43

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
(Amounts in Thousands)

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor

Subsidiaries Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED

BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES . . . $

— $ (230,931)$ 944,152

$ (25,496)

$(4,427) $

683,298

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of business, net of

—

(1,716)

(32,608)

(9,658)

cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (1,399,064)

—

—

Net cash used in investing

activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (1,400,780)

(32,608)

(9,658)

—

—

—

(43,982)

(1,399,064)

(1,443,046)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Intercompany activities . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock

options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock repurchased . . . . .
Proceeds from term loans, net . . .
Repayment on term loans . . . . . .
Proceeds from senior

subordinated notes, net

. . . . . .
Financing fees and other . . . . . . .

Net cash provided by (used

192,703

580,487 (910,647)

133,030

4,427

—

30,112
(3,000)
(207,755)

—
—
—
— 1,711,515
(834,409)
—

—
—

939,584
(3,580)

—
—
—
—
—

—
—

—
—
—
—
—

—
—

—
—
—
—
—

—
—

30,112
(3,000)
(207,755)
1,711,515
(834,409)

939,584
(3,580)

in) financing activities . . .

12,060

2,393,597 (910,647)

133,030

4,427

1,632,467

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE

CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND

CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD . . . . . . .

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,

—

—

—

242

12,060

761,886

897

98,118

1,500

659,365

7,911

45,257

—

—

—

242

872,961

714,033

END OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,560 $ 1,421,251 $

8,808

$143,375

$ — $ 1,586,994

F-44

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(Amounts in Thousands)

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED

BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES . . . $

— $ (298,797)$ 734,130

$ 82,451

$ 3,154

$

520,938

TransDigm
Group

TransDigm
Inc.

Subsidiary
Guarantors

Non-Guarantor

Subsidiaries Eliminations

Total
Consolidated

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of businesses, net of

cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash used in investing

—

(2,871)

(44,564)

(7,436)

(1,624,278)

—

—

activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (1,627,149)

(44,564)

(7,436)

—

—

—

(54,871)

(1,624,278)

(1,679,149)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Intercompany activities . . . . . . . .
Excess tax benefits related to

share-based payment
arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Proceeds from exercise of stock

options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from term loans, net . . .
Repayment on term loans . . . . . .
Proceeds from senior

subordinated notes, net

. . . . . .
Financing fees and other . . . . . . .

Net cash (used in) provided

(120,862)

867,990 (685,448)

(58,526)

(3,154)

—

61,965

—

61,674
(3,365)

—
—
— 1,515,954
— (1,025,318)

—
—

445,303
(1,266)

—

—
—
—
—

—
—

—

—
—
—
—

—
—

—

—
—
—
—

—
—

61,965

61,674
(3,365)
1,515,954
(1,025,318)

445,303
(1,266)

by financing activities . . .

(588) 1,802,663 (685,448)

(58,526)

(3,154)

1,054,947

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE

CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN

CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD . . . . . . .

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,

—

—

—

(2,251)

(588)

(123,283)

4,118

14,238

2,088

782,648

3,793

31,019

—

—

—

(2,251)

(105,515)

819,548

END OF PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

1,500 $

659,365 $

7,911

$ 45,257

$ — $

714,033

*****

F-45

TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, AND 2015
(Amounts in Thousands)

Column A

Description

Year Ended September 30, 2017

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . .
Reserve for excess and obsolete

Column B

Balance at
Beginning of
Period

Column C
Additions

Column D

Charged to Costs
and Expenses

Acquisitions

Deductions from
Reserve(1)

Column E

Balance at
End of
Period

$ 4,414

$ 1,095

$ 363

$ (2,053)

$ 3,819

inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80,039

17,361

4,254

(21,879)

79,775

Valuation allowance for deferred tax

assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27,286

5,928

—

—

33,214

Year Ended September 30, 2016

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . .
Reserve for excess and obsolete

$ 3,801

$ 1,043

$ 724

$ (1,154)

$ 4,414

inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,158

26,407

Valuation allowance for deferred tax

assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,645

9,641

—

—

(10,526)

80,039

—

27,286

Year Ended September 30, 2015

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . .
Reserve for excess and obsolete

$ 4,091

$ (376)

$ 271

$

(185)

$ 3,801

inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55,586

15,554

Valuation allowance for deferred tax

assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24,267

(6,622)

—

—

(6,982)

64,158

—

17,645

(1) The amounts in this column represent charge-offs net of recoveries and the impact of foreign currency

translation adjustments.

F-46

EXHIBIT INDEX
TO FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

EXHIBIT
NO.

DESCRIPTION

3.54

3.165

3.166

3.167

3.168

10.48

12.1

21.1

23.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

Certificate of Formation, filed June 28, 2007, of Avionic Instruments LLC

Certificate of Formation, filed December 13, 2016, of Wings Acquisition Sub LLC (now known as
Interiors In Flight LLC)

Limited Liability Agreement of Wings Acquisition Sub LLC (now known as Interiors in Flight
LLC)

Certificate of Formation, filed December 13, 2016, of Wings Acquisition Co LLC (now known as
SCHROTH Safety Products LLC)

Limited Liability Agreement of Wings Acquisition Co LLC (now known as SCHROTH Safety
Products LLC)

Ninth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2017, among
TransDigm Receivables LLC, TransDigm Inc., PNC Bank, National Association, as a Committed
Purchaser, as Purchaser Agent for its Purchaser Group and as Administrator, Atlantic Asset
Securitization LLC, as a Conduit Purchaser, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as a
Committed Purchaser and as a Purchaser Agent for its and Atlantic’s Purchaser Group, and Fifth
Third Bank, as a Committed Purchaser and as Purchaser Agent for its Purchaser Group

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Subsidiaries of TransDigm Group Incorporated

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Certification by Principal Executive Officer of TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification by Principal Financial Officer of TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification by Principal Executive Officer of TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification by Principal Financial Officer of TransDigm Group Incorporated pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements formatted in XBRL.

RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO EBITDA AS DEFINED

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Net income (loss)
Less (income) loss from

. . . . . . . . . . $

1 $

3 $ 14 $ (17) $ 11 $ 14 $ 31 $ (76) $ 14 $ 35 $ 25 $ 89 $133 $163 $163 $172 $325 $303 $ 307 $ 447 $ 586 $ 597

(in millions)

discontinued operations . . . . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (20) — —

—

—

—

32

Depreciation and amortization
expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

Interest expense, net
Income tax provision

(benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Warrant put value

7
5

2

6
3

5

7
3

6
23

7
28

9
32

13
37

10
43

18
75

17
80

16
77

24
92

25
93

30

28
73
61
84 112 185 212 271

68

96
348

94
419

122
484

141
602

13

(2)

8

9

17

(45)

6

23

16

53

74

88

88

77 163 146

142

189

182

209

adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
Extraordinary item . . . . . . . . . —

5
7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

17

44

24

10

EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(68) 113 155 134 258 325 363 393 475 768 793
Merger expense . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — 40 — — — 176 — — — — — — — — — —
Refinancing costs . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — — 49 — — — — 72 — 30
Acquisition related costs . . . . . —
26
Non-cash compensation and
deferred compensation
costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — —

8 — 15

1 —

1 —

22

19

30

12

20

64

54

98

49

6

7

7

6

1

6

6

6

9

2

1

2

One-time special bonus . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — —
Other nonrecurring charges . . . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public offering costs . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — —

2 — — — — — —

3

2

1
6 — — — — — — —

13

893 1,149 1,374 1,581
—
—
40
132
31
21

—
18
37

—
16
58

26

—

1

—

32

—

48

—

(2)

(1)

—

—

46

—
13
—

EBITDA As Defined . . . . . . . $ 17 $ 25 $ 44 $ 51 $ 54 $ 72 $ 98 $124 $139 $164 $194 $275 $333 $375 $412 $590 $809 $900 $1,073 $1,234 $1,495 $1,711

RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS TO ADJUSTED NET INCOME

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

(in millions)

Net income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $303 $307 $447 $586 $629
130
Gross adjustments from EBITDA to EBITDA as Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase accounting backlog amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23
(95)
Tax adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181
17
(63)

107
7
(37)

121
19
(81)

84
5
(26)

Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $380 $442 $510 $645 $687

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

COMMON STOCK DATA

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

NUMBER OF STOCKHOLDERS

Our common stock is traded on the New York 
Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol TDG. 

TransDigm Group Incorporated
The Tower at Erieview
1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3000
Cleveland, OH 44114
216.706.2960

REGISTRAR & TRANSFER AGENT

transdigm.com

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders
will be held at The Tower at Erieview,
1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3000,
Cleveland, OH 44114, on March 20, 2018,
at 9 a.m. Eastern Time.

Computershare
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940
800.622.6757
computershare.com/investor

FORM 10-K

The TransDigm Group Incorporated Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 
September 30, 2017, is available at our website,
transdigm.com. Copies are also available 
without charge upon request to the Investor 
Relations Department at the address listed 
for the corporate headquarters.

The number of beneficial holders of 
the company’s common shares as 
of November 3, 2017, was approximately 
62,000 beneficial holders.

INVESTOR REL ATIONS CONTACT

Liza Sabol
Investor Relations
216.706.2945
ir@transdigm.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

Ernst & Young LLP

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

Sales

Gross Profit Percentage

Income From Operations

Operating Margin

Net Income

Adjusted Net Income

Net Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Earnings Per Share

Diluted Shares Outstanding

EBITDA As Defined

EBITDA As Defined Margin

Balance Sheet

Cash

Working Capital

Total Assets

Long-Term Debt, Including Current Portion
Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2017

$  3,504

2016

$  3,171

2015

 $  2,707 

2014

 $ 2,373

56.6%

54.5%

53.6%

53.4%

$   1,480

$  1,268 

 $  1,074 

 $    928 

42.2%

40.0%

39.7%

39.1%

$      597

$      687

$    7.88

$  12.38

55.5

$   1,711

$     586

$     645

$  10.39

$  11.49

56.2

 $  1,495

 $     447 

 $     510

 $    7.84

 $    9.01

56.6

 $    307

 $    442

 $    3.16

 $    7.76

57.0

 $  1,234 

 $ 1,073 

48.8%

47.1%

45.6%

45.2%

2013

$1,924  

54.5%

 $   749   

38.9%

 $   303   

 $   380  

 $  2.39   

 $  6.90 

55.1

 $   900   

46.8%

$     651

$  1,587 

 $     714

 $    820 

 $   565   

1,263

9,976

11,763
(2,951)

2,178

10,726

10,196
(651)

 1,129 

 8,304 

 8,350
(1,038)

 1,067

 6,627

 7,381
(1,556)

 968   

6,046   

 5,659  
(336)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OFFICERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CORPORATE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

W. NICHOLAS HOWLEY
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
of Directors

KEVIN STEIN
President and
Chief Operating Officer

ROBERT S. HENDERSON
Vice Chairman

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

W. NICHOLAS HOWLEY (4)
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of Directors,
TransDigm Group Incorporated

DAVID BARR(3)
Former Managing Director,
Warburg Pincus LLC

WILLIAM DRIES (2) (3)
Retired Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer,
EnPro Industries

MERVIN DUNN (1) (3)
Operating advisor at Clearlake Capital Group
and former Co-Chariman of the Board,
Futuris Group of Companies Ltd.

MICHAEL GRAFF (1)
Managing Director, Warburg Pincus LLC

SEAN P. HENNESSY (1) (2)
Senior Vice President Corporate Planning,
Development & Administration and former
Chief Financial Officer,
The Sherwin-Williams Company

RAYMOND F. LAUBENTHAL
Retired President and Chief Operating Officer,
TransDigm Group Incorporated

JAMES SKULINA
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

BERNT G. IVERSEN, II
Executive Vice President –
Mergers & Acquisitions and
Business Development

ROGER V. JONES
Executive Vice President

GARY E. MCCULLOUGH (2)
Advisor to Abundant Venture Partners and Former
Chief Executive Officer of Advertising Resources, Inc.
and Career Education Corporation

DOUGLAS W. PEACOCK (4)
Retired Chairman of the Board of Directors
and past Chief Executive Officer, TransDigm
Group Incorporated

ROBERT J. SMALL (1) (2) (4)
Managing Director, Berkshire Partners LLC

JOHN STAER (2) (3)
Retired Chief Executive Officer, Satair A/S

(1) Compensation Committee
(2) Audit Committee
(3) Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
(4) Executive Committee

PETER PALMER
Executive Vice President

JOEL REISS
Executive Vice President

JORGE L. VALLADARES III
Executive Vice President

NOT PICTURED:

TERRANCE PARADIE
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer,
resigned January 2, 2018

HALLE FINE TERRION
General Counsel,
Chief Compliance Officer and
Secretary

THE TOWER AT ERIEVIEW, 1301 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 3000, CLEVEL AND, OH 44114 216.706.2960 TRANSDIGM.COM