Annual report 2015Contents – Management’s review
MANAGEMENT’S REVIEW
16 Commercial
34 Executive Board
3
Income overview
4
Introduction
5 Events in 2015
18 Corporate
20 Sweden
35
Corporate Social Responsibility in Tryg
22
Investment activities
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6 Targets and strategy
24
Capital and risk management
37 Financial statements
9 Financial targets and outlook
26 Shareholder information
104 Group chart
10 Tryg’s results
14 Private
28 Corporate governance
105 Glossary
32 Supervisory Board
106 Product overview
Learn more
Reference to further information at tryg.com.
Reference to further information in the
annual report.
Reference to contents.
Tryg is the second-largest non-life insurance company in the Nordic region. We are the largest player in
Denmark and the third-largest in Norway. In Sweden, we are the fifth-largest company in the market.
We offer a broad range of insurance products to both private individuals and businesses.
Our 3,400 employees provide peace of mind for 2.8 million customers and handle
approximately 950,000 claims on a yearly basis.
Our ambition is to become the world’s best insurance company.
Editor Investor Relations | Publication 21 January 2016 | Layout amo design | Proofreading TextMinded
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2
Income overview
DKKm
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Total insurance operating costs
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Investment return after insurance technical interest
Other income and costs
Profit/loss before tax
Tax
Profit/loss on continuing business
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business after tax
Profit/loss
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key figures
Total equity
Return on equity after tax (%)
Number of shares at 31 December (1,000)
Earnings per share
Net asset value per share (DKK)
Dividend per share (DKK)
Premium growth in local currencies
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Run-off, net of reinsurance (%)
Large claims, net of reinsurance (%)
Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%)
Combined ratio on business areas
Private
Commercial
Corporate
Sweden
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
4,393
-2,988
-615
790
-272
4
522
201
-19
704
11
715
6
721
241
4,646
-2,976
-684
986
-220
9
775
13
-20
768
-135
633
7
640
338
9,831
27.5
282,316
2.53
11,119
23.0
289,120
2.19
-1.6
68.0
6.2
74.2
14.2
88.4
-5.5
3.1
5.4
87.0
85.0
99.4
73.2
-0.1
64.1
4.7
68.8
14.9
83.7
-7.3
4.3
2.6
82.4
74.5
90.4
98.3
2015
17,977
-13,562
-2,720
1,695
710
18
2,423
-5
-91
2,327
-395
1,932
49
1,981
1,212
9,831
18.9
282,316
6.95
34.82
6.00a)
-0.8
75.4
-3.9
71.5
15.3
86.8
-6.7
3.4
3.4
85.4
83.6
90.7
83.5
2014
18,652
-12,650
-2,689
3,313
-341
60
3,032
360
-90
3,302
-755
2,547
10
2,557
1,131
11,119
23.0
289,120
8.74
38.46
5.80
-1.1
67.8
1.8
69.6
14.6
84.2
-6.1
3.1
2.4
82.5
79.4
89.8
92.0
2013
19,504
-14,411
-3,008
2,085
349
62
2,496
588
-91
2,993
-620
2,373
-4
2,369
970
11,107
21.5
296,870
7.88
37.41
5.40
-2.7
73.9
-1.8
72.1
15.6
87.7
-5.0
2.1
3.2
86.0
85.4
91.7
91.2
2012
20,314
-14,675
-3,295
2,344
86
62
2,492
585
-60
3,017
-837
2,180
28
2,208
1,015
10,979
22.1
303,474
7.30
36.18
5.20
-0.1
72.2
-0.4
71.8
16.4
88.2
-5.0
2.3
1.8
87.7
81.3
91.4
95.3
a) Dividend per share in 2015 includes dividend paid out in July of DKK 2.50 and proposed dividend of DKK 3.50.
| Contents – Management’s review
2011
19,948
-15,783
-3,271
894
507
171
1,572
61
-30
1,603
-455
1,148
-8
1,140
944
9,007
13.1
301,866
3.77
29.84
1.30
3.6
79.1
-2.5
76.6
16.6
93.2
-4.7
2.7
3.6
92.7
89.6
93.6
102.9
3
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Customer focus and increasing dividend
Enhanced customer experience
ity’s approval of Tryg’s internal capital model, which
In 2015, we continued our efforts to improve custo m-
means that Tryg is well-prepared for the implementa-
er experience. Focus has most important ly been on
tion of the Solvency II regulatory regime from 2016.
improving our customer services, for example through
Risk management is also important in relation to
the increased empowerment of front-line staff as
individual products, and in 2015 a small number of
a way of increasing first-contact resolution. We are
products, in particular contents and property, did
continuously following up on our customers’ assess-
not develop satisfactorily. Minor price adjustments
ment of their contact with Tryg. We are therefore
and improved claims assessment procedures will
pleased to note a significant improvement in our NPS
therefore be introduced. Tryg continuously assesses
score, up from 11 at the Capital Markets Day in
developments in the number and size of claims.
November 2014 to 22 in Q4 2015 and with more than
78% of our customers returning ratings of 9 or 10 in
Stable and increasing dividend for shareholders
the text message surveys used to capture customer
Being a shareholder in Tryg must be attractive, and in
feedback after each customer contact. It is also good
accordance with Tryg’s dividend policy, we strive to
news for Tryg’s customers that Tryg hedsGruppen,
ensure that a steadily increasing dividend is paid to
which owns 60% of Tryg, has decided to pay out a
Tryg’s shareholders. The Supervisory Board proposes
bonus to Tryg’s Danish customers from 2016.
that a dividend of DKK 3.50 be paid for the second half
of the year, bringing the dividend paid out for 2015 to
Efficient insurance operations
DKK 6.00 per share. Tryg also assesses the relevance
A profit of DKK 1,981m was returned, equivalent
of extraordinary share buy backs as a way of increas-
to a return on equity of 18.9%, together with a
ing value creation for our shareholders. In 2015, we
com bined ratio of 86.8 and an expense ratio of
completed a DKK 1bn share buy back programme,
14.9 before one-off costs. The return on equity was
and in 2016 we will execute a similar programme,
below target due to very low investment income and
while at the same time ensuring a solid capital base.
one-offs. Tryg met the combined ratio and expense
The total yield to shareholders was 6.9% for 2015.
ratio targets for 2015. Tryg aims to achieve efficiency
improvements of DKK 750m in the period up until
Thank-you to employees
2017, and the delivery of savings of DKK 165m in
The delivery of an enhanced customer experience
2015 exceeded the target for the year. The efficiency
and the financial results has only been possible
programme will be key to improving results and
through the committed efforts of Tryg’s employees,
reaching an expense ratio of 14 or below in 2017.
and the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board
would like to thank all for their hard work.
Efficient risk management
Risk management is essential for an insurance com-
pany – spanning from the overall risk management
of Tryg to the pricing of our products. A milestone in
Morten Hübbe
Jørgen Huno Rasmussen
2015 was the Danish Financial Supervisory Author-
Group CEO
Chairman
| Contents – Management’s review
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
4
4
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Events in 2015
Share buy back
programme initiated
On 2 January, Tryg initiated
an extraordinary share buy
back of DKK 1bn, which was
completed on 18 December
2015.
Contents
insurance ‘Best in Test’
Tryg’s contents insurance was
named ‘Best in Test’ by the
Danish Consumer Council’s
magazine TÆNK. The criteria
tested are coverage, customer
satisfaction, number of
appeals and price.
New car insurance product
Tryg launched a new car in-
surance product in Denmark.
The product provides basic
coverage, and in addition
customers can buy add-on
products to cover their
exact insurance needs.
Read about the car
insurance at tryg.dk.
New car insurance in Sweden
Moderna, Tryg’s Swedish branch, launched a new car insurance product,
‘Moderna Smart’. The price of the new product is differentiated depend-
ing on the driver’s driving style, which is recorded by a mobile app.
Read more about the insurance on modernaforsakringar.se.
Acquisition of Swedish child insurance portfolio
Tryg acquired Skandia’s child and adult insurance portfolio with a
premium volume of approximately SEK 250m. The portfolio will be
integrated into Tryg’s Swedish branch Moderna in H1 2016.
Tryg’s ‘A-’ rating maintained
The credit rating agency
Standard & Poor’s recon-
firmed Tryg and Tryg Garanti’s
‘A-/stable’ rating.
TryghedsGruppen’s members’ bonus scheme approved
Tryg’s majority shareholder TryghedsGruppen’s member bonus
scheme was approved by the Danish Business Authority. The
scheme allows TryghedsGruppen to pay out some of its profit to
members (policyholders of Tryg Forsikring A/S in Denmark).
New health insurance
in Denmark
A new health insurance
product was launched in
Denmark, which includes
a prevention app named
‘TrygHealth’. The app
provides access to a medical
hotline via mobile video
conferencing and includes
Healthcare profile Plus cover,
which allows the insured to
hold video conferences with
a dietitian or physiotherapist.
Read more about
the new health insurance
at tryg.dk.
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Tryg share split 1:5
On 12 May, Tryg split its share in 1:5, meaning each share with a
nominal value of DKK 25 was replaced by five shares with a nominal
value of DKK 5. The Tryg share was split as the price was up to more
than DKK 600 in 2014, making it the second-most expensive share
in the C20 index.
Tryg’s car insurance Best in Test
Tryg’s new car insurance product launched in March 2015 was
recommended as ‘Best in Test’ by the Danish Consumer Council.
The test also showed that Tryg is the company with the lowest
number of complaints tried before the appeals board.
Launch of change of car ownership insurance
Tryg was the first company to introduce a change of car ownership
insurance product in Denmark. The product is for customers buying
and selling cars privately and covers mechanical damage for the
first six months.
Read more about the insurance at tryg.dk.
Launch of new accident insurance
Tryg launched new personal accident products in Denmark and Nor-
way. The products provide basic cover with the option of taking out
additional cover, for example for critical illness for children and young
people.
Read more about the products at tryg.dk and tryg.no.
Moderna – insurance broker of the year
For the third year running, Tryg’s branch in Sweden, Moderna, was
named insurance broker of the year within the commercial and
corporate segments.
CFO resigning
Group CFO Tor Magne Lønnum is resigning to take up a position
as CFO of Aimia Inc in Montreal, Canada. He will stay on as CFO of
Tryg until the end of April 2016.
Denmark hit by storm
On 29 November, Denmark was hit by a storm, named Gorm. Tryg
received approximately 9,000 claims, of which 24% were reported
within the first 24 hours, and 20% were reported online.
Internal capital model
Tryg’s internal capital model
in relation to Solvency II was
approved by the Danish FSA.
New bond issue
Tryg Forsikring A/S entered
into an agreement on the issu-
ance of Solvency II-compliant
Tier 2 capital in the form of a
bond issue in the amount of
NOK 1.4bn (DKK 1.1bn) in
the Norwegian market.
Flooding in parts of Norway
The eastern parts of Norway
were hit by severe floods. Tryg
received approx. 500 claims.
Organisational change
Tryg announced an organisa tional change of its daily management
structure as of 1 January 2016. The Nordic business areas are trans-
ferred to national business areas with new directors. The new struc-
ture replaces the Group Executive Management and top management
com prise an Executive Board com prising CEO, CFO and COO.
| Contents – Management’s review
5
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Targets and strategy
Aiming for the highest level of employee satisfac-
than growth. However, competition remained
tion in the financial sector in the Nordic region,
fierce in 2015 in both the Danish and Norwegian
Tryg was pleased to note a continued increase in
markets. In Denmark, the situation is impacted by
employee satisfaction in 2015, with Tryg surpass-
the high profitability of car insurance combined
ing the general level of employee satisfaction in
with high sales of smaller and safer cars. Generally
the financial sector in the region.
speaking, this development in car sales is leading
to a lowering of insurance risk and a correspond-
Value creation for our shareholders
ing reduction in average premiums, reducing total
Tryg’s shareholders must see Tryg as a company
premium income. Tryg has developed a new price-
Our purpose
for customers, employees and shareholders, and
increasing dividends. In 2015, Tryg did not meet its
this development through a slightly higher average
Tryg’s purpose is to create peace of mind and value
with ambitious targets disbursing stable and
differentiated car product which partly mitigates
We create peace of mind and value for
income and one-off costs. Tryg met the combined
affected the market somewhat, while a number
customers, employees and shareholders.
Tryg’s ambition is to become the world’s best insur-
ratio and expense ratio targets for 2015 and is on
of minor competitors actively gained market
this must be at the core of everything we do.
return on equity target due to very low investment
premium. In Norway, the weakened economy
ance company. This ambition lies at the heart of all
track to achieving the ambitious financial targets
share. In general, the impact of aggregators was
the strategic measures implemented by Tryg. Tryg
set for the period up until 2017.
limited in both Denmark and Norway. Overall,
Our ambition
has identified its fundamental corporate values,
Tryg’s retention rate was quite stable, indicating
To become the world's best insurance
the company’s ambition.
The Nordic insurance market is characterised
insurance company. In Denmark, the retention
which will help us meet our targets and support
Stable Nordic insurance market
that customers are generally satisfied with their
company.
Our values
by consumers and businesses that have largely
rate increased somewhat, while a slight drop was
Our customers – our most important asset
covered their insurance needs, combined with
seen in Norway.
Our customers are our most important asset. Tryg
relatively low rates of economic growth. Profitability
strives to continuously strengthen customer relations
in the insurance industry is generally high as the vast
Market developments differed in Denmark and
through our advisory services, products, concepts,
majority of companies focus on earnings rather
Norway in 2015. In Denmark, consumer optimism
Our values are highly integrated in our
claims handling procedures and claims prevention
culture and consistent with our purpose.
measures. In 2015, we had a strong focus on initia-
tives supporting the customer targets for 2017.
Employee satisfaction 2011-2015
•
We meet people with respect,
openness and trust
Our employees – our most important resource
•
We show initiative, share knowledge
Our employees are our most important resource and
and take responsibility
key to realising our vision of becoming the world’s
•
We deliver solutions based on quality
best insurance company. As an important step
and simplicity
towards achieving this, all our employees must feel
•
We create sustainable results
that they have an opportunity to be successful. Clear
Index
75
70
65
60
55
50
increased, leading to increasing real estate prices
and a lower unemployment rate of around 4.6%
at the end of 2015. Total car sales were up 9.9%
in 2015 compared with 2014 and were character-
ised, in particular, by increased sales of small cars.
The Norwegian economy deteriorated in 2015
primarily due to the significant drop in oil prices
although the Norwegian economy is generally
and ambitious targets must be set for each individual
Tryg
Nordic financial market
Nordic market
to around 4.4%. Car sales in Norway were up
employee, and regular feedback must be provided.
4.5% in 2015.
| Contents – Management’s review
6
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
very strong. The unemployment rate increased
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Targets
strong focus on improving customer experience
have sent more than 600,000 automated text mes-
throughout all management and employee levels.
Tryg has a strong focus on both financials and
in all parts of the organisation.
sages to customers after they have been in contact
This creates clarity in terms of how the individual
customers, and targets have therefore been set
with us and received more than 200,000 replies.
employee contributes to the overall corporate
for both areas. Financial and customer targets are
Strategic initiatives
78% rated their experience with Tryg between 9
targets, which in turn leads to a more structured
inextricably linked. Loyal customers mean high
Tryg has set up four strategic initiatives to support
and 10 on a scale of 1-10. Tryg’s overall NPS score
and continuous dialogue regarding the employee’s
retention rates, keeping the expenses associated
its financial and customer targets. The strategic
has almost doubled since the Capital Markets Day
own personal development.
with attracting new customers low, thereby con-
initiatives for 2016 are unchanged from 2015.
in November 2014, from 11 to 22, which means
tributing to a low expense ratio. With the financial
that our 2017 target of an NPS score of 22 has been
Leading in efficiency
results posted for 2015, Tryg is on track to meeting
Strategic initiatives 2016
achieved. Concurrently with the implementation of
After having delivered on the previous efficiency
the financial targets for 2017.
• Next level pricing
automated NPS data, all managers and front-line
programme targets, Tryg launched its new efficiency
• Customer journey & success culture
employees have received training and coaching in
programme in 2015 with the aim of further reducing
In 2015, Tryg improved its performance on all
• Leading in efficiency
delivering a superior customer dialogue as close
claims and direct costs by DKK 750m by the end
customer-related parameters as a result of a
• IT stability and digitalisation
relations and the sense of genuinely being listened
of 2017, with DKK 500m relating to claims and
Next level pricing
most highly in the overall customer experience.
a further consolidation of Tryg’s Nordic procurement
to are two of the factors which our custo mers rate
DKK 250m to expenses. As regards the claims costs,
Financial targets 2015
Next level pricing (price differentiation) has been an
volume and the dedication of more resources to
ongoing initiative and Tryg’s most important initia-
To increase employee competences and motivation,
com batting fraud will be among the primary drivers,
• Return on equity of 20% after tax
tive in recent years. By the end of 2015, Tryg had
Tryg implemented the SuccessFactors tool in 2015,
while outsourcing, digitalisation and process
developed 33 new price-differentiated products,
which allows corporate KPIs to be cascaded down
optimi sation will contribute positively to reducing
• Combined ratio ≤90
• Expense ratio <15
Financial targets 2017
• Return on equity of ≥21% after tax
• Combined ratio ≤87
• Expense ratio ≤14
and it is estimated that 85% of Tryg’s tariffs are at
peer level. This development supports the target of
being ahead of peers for 25% of products and on a
par with peers for the remaining products in 2017.
In 2016, as an important part of the next level
pricing initiative, the portfolio will be converted
to the new price-differentiated products. This will
positively impact both profitability and efficiency,
especially in claims handling through the stand-
ardised handling of insurance agreements with
Customer targets 2017
similar terms and conditions.
• NPS + 100%
• Retention rate + 1 pp
Customer journey & success culture
In 2015, Tryg implemented the Net Promoter Score
• Customers ≥3 products + 5 pp
(NPS) system in all sales and claims teams across
Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In just one year, we
How is the NPS defined?
The basic principle of the recommendation rate, the Net Promoter Score (NPS)®, is that each customer
can be divided into three categories: Promoters, Passives and Detractors. The NPS is based on the fol-
lowing question: Would you recommend Tryg to a friend or colleague? The NPS is expressed as a value
between -100 and 100. Example: If we ask 100 customers, and we score 9-10 with 50 customers and
1-6 with 40 customers, our NPS will be: 50-40 = 10
NPS =
Promoters
1
2
3
–
4
Detractors
5
6
7
8
9
10
Detractors
Passives
Promoters
| Contents – Management’s review
7
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Change of car ownership
insurance
Tryg was the first company to introduce a
change of car ownership insurance product in
Denmark. The product is for customers buying
and selling cars privately and consists of a car
test and a change of car ownership insurance.
expenses and supporting the expense ratio target
agreed to all future communications with Tryg being
of 14 or below in 2017. During 2015, the out-
solely digital, while the figure for Norway is 63%. The
sourcing programme continued as planned, with 46
digitalisation programme has focused on creating a
employees being out sourced, primarily in Finance.
better customer experience in Tryg’s claims handling
The potential of the out sourcing programme is
and services, and secondly on automation, also in
deemed to be significant.
the claims division. The programme is swiftly gaining
momentum, having already released a number of new
IT stability and digitalisation
solutions. For 2016, the focus will be on self-service,
IT stability is extremely important for an insurance
automation, lead generation and cross sales. The
company which is very dependent on IT systems
target for 2017 is for 90% of our customers to be
for its customer communications within both sales
digital and for 80% of claims notifications from digital
and claims handling. Following the switch to TCS
customers to be reported via Tryg’s webpages.
Tata Consultancy, Tryg has seen a continuous im-
provement in IT stability and is now within sight of
Corporate Social Responsibility
the maximum downtime target. This is due to the
Corporate Social Responsibility is an integrated part of
joint efforts of Tryg and its partners, encompassing
Tryg’s core business, which is to create peace of mind
the transition of services, process optimisation,
and value for our customers, employees and share-
monitoring, upgrades and simplification of the
holders. This means that Corporate Social Respon-
IT structure and systems.
sibility plays a constant role in the decisions which
we make, in the improvement and development of
Digitalisation is very important and will become even
our products and services, in the optimisation of our
more important in future. An expansion of Tryg’s
operations and in the positive contributions which
digital communication with customers requires the
we make to society at large through our activities.
necessary acceptance by customers that we commu-
Read more about Tryg's CSR activities on pages
nicate digitally. In Denmark, 80% of customers have
35-36.
Efficiency programme – claims procurement
Efficiency programme – expenses
DKKm
500
400
300
200
100
0
250
500
150
100 105
2015
2016
2017
Total target
DKKm
250
200
150
100
50
0
125
250
75
50 60
2015
2016
2017
Total target
Target
Achieved
Target
Achieved
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
8
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Financial targets and outlook
Financial targets 2017
highly skilled organisation.
and administration and DKK 250m relating to
is around 7% with the MSCI world index as the
tion through integration into Tryg's efficient and
relating to the procurement of claims services
return is expected. For shares, the expected return
expenses. The target is DKK 225m for 2016 and
benchmark, while the expected return for property
• Return on equity of ≥21% after tax
Tryg has a solid reserve position, and at the Capital
DKK 375m in 2017.
• Combined ratio ≤87
• Expense ratio ≤14
Markets Day in November 2014, Tryg therefore
is around 6%. Investment activities also include
other types of investment income and expenses,
announced that the run-off level was likely to be
The investment portfolio is divided into a match
especially the cost of managing investments, the
higher than the run-off level during the pre-2015
portfolio corresponding to the technical provi-
cost of currency hedges and interest paid on loans.
period. Tryg expects this to be the case until the
sions and a free portfolio. The objective is for the
end of 2017, after which we expect a long-term
return on the match portfolio and changes in the
There has been a gradual lowering of tax rates in
The return on equity for 2015 was below target
run-off level of 2.5-3%.
technical provisions due to interest rate changes
Denmark, Norway and Sweden in recent years. In
due to very low investment income and one-off
to be neutral when taken together. From 2016,
Denmark, the tax rate was 23.5% in 2015 and will
costs. Tryg met the combined ratio and expense
In 2016, weather claims net of reinsurance and
the curve used for discounting technical provi-
be reduced to 22% in 2016. The Norwegian tax
ratio targets for 2015 and is well positioned for
large claims are expected to be DKK 500m and
sions will change due to the implementation of
rate was 27% in 2015 and will be reduced to 25%
meeting the targets for 2017.
DKK 550m, respectively, which is unchanged
the Solvency II directive, and this might result in
in 2016, while the Swedish rate was 22%. When
relative to 2015.
slightly more volatile match portfolio net results.
calculating the total tax payable, account should
Tryg expects growth in gross premium income
The new curve increases the interest rate risk of
also be taken of the fact that gains and losses on
of 0-2% in local currencies in 2016. From 2017,
The interest rate used to discount Tryg’s technical
the technical provisions, thereby introducing a
shareholdings are not taxed in Norway. All in all,
we expect premium growth to be in line with GDP.
provisions is historically low. An interest rate in-
larger difference between the match return and
this causes the expected tax payable for an
The size of the motor market will generally be
crease will have a positive effect on Tryg’s results.
the changes in the technical provisions. Moreover,
average year to be reduced from around 22-23%
negatively impacted by technological develop-
Generally speaking, an interest rate increase of
the curve introduces a component, 'Credit Risk
to around 21% in 2016.
ments, and Tryg has therefore announced that we
1 percentage point will increase the pre-tax result
Adjustment – or CRA', which cannot be hedged,
will be taking a more active approach to acquiring
by around DKK 300m and vice versa.
and the impact from this component can only
The value of the NOK fell in 2015, which had
smaller port folios and developing the market for
be negative.
products which are expected to see higher growth
For the purpose of realising the financial targets,
a negative impact on Tryg’s operating profit.
The share of equity held in NOK and SEK is
rates such as pet insurance and child insurance.
Tryg launched an efficiency programme aimed at
The return on bonds in the free portfolio will
continuously hedged in the financial markets.
In general, acquisitions should support value crea-
realising savings of DKK 750m, with DKK 500m
vary, but given current interest rate levels, a low
| Contents – Management’s review
9
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Tryg’s results
The one-off costs of DKK 120m incurred in Q3
2015 were in line with Tryg’s statement at the
Capital Markets Day (CMD) in November 2014
Customer highlights 2015
and relate primarily to Tryg’s sourcing programme,
•
NPS improved from 11 to 22
but also to initiatives designed to achieve our first-
• Retention rate improved from 87.9 to 88.1
contact resolution targets and improve our digital
•
Number of customers with three or more
solutions. As communicated at the CMD, a thorough
products up from 56.3% to 56.7%
analysis undertaken by Tryg in cooperation with
•
TryghedsGruppen’s members’ bonus
its sourcing partner has identified a significant
scheme approved by the Danish Business
A result of DKK 1,981m affected by one-off costs
Results
sourcing potential both in the claims and in the
Authority
and a low investment return. Proposed dividend
Reporting a return on equity of 18.9%, a combined
administration parts of the business areas.
of DKK 3.50 per share equivalent to a dividend
ratio of 86.8 and an expense ratio of 15.3, Tryg
of DKK 6 per share for 2015. A share buy back
met its combined ratio and expense ratio targets.
In 2015, Tryg maintained a strong focus on the
The share of customer with three or more products
programme of DKK 1,000m is planned for 2016.
The target was a combined ratio below 90 and an
customer targets for 2017. The Net Promoter
increased from 56.3% to 56.7%. Increasing the
Financial highlights 2015
•
Profit after tax of DKK 1,981m
(DKK 2,557m)
•
•
Return on equity after tax of 18.9% (23.0%)
Technical result of DKK 2,423m
(DKK 3,032m)
• Combined ratio of 86.8 (84.2)
• Premium income reduced by 0.8% (-1.1%)
•
Claims ratio, net of ceded business, of
expense ratio below 15, and adjusted for one-off
Score (NPS) improved from 11 at the CMD to 22
number of products per customer is an effective
costs of DKK 120m relating to the ongoing ef-
by the end of 2015. Improving in all business areas
way of improving customer loyalty and has been a
ficiency programme, an expense ratio of 14.9 was
in the course of the year, the NPS has proven to be
focus area in all parts of the organisation.
realised. Due to the above-mentioned one-off
a strong driver for improving customer loyalty. In
costs and the very low investment result, Tryg did
2015, the score improved very significantly, espe-
In August, the Danish Business Authority approved
not meet the target of the return on equity of 20%.
cially for Tryg’s Norwegian business. At the end of
the members’ bonus scheme of TryghedsGruppen,
2015, the NPS was also implemented by Corporate
Tryg’s majority shareholder. Tryg expects the
Profit after tax was DKK 1,981m (DKK 2,557m),
with very high scores, with a particularly high score
bonus scheme and the expected disbursement
positively affected by the ongoing efficiency pro-
of 63 being achieved by our Guarantee business.
of bonus corresponding to 5-8% of the prior-year
gramme, which contributed savings of DKK 165m
At 88.1, the retention rate was up from 87.9 at the
premium to support our customer targets and
in 2015 against a target of DKK 150m. Profit after
CMD. In 2015, we saw a significant improvement
especially customer retention. The first bonus
tax was adversely impacted by a low level of in-
in Commercial Denmark from 86.6 at CMD to
will be disbursed in spring 2016.
71.5 (69.6)
vestment income and one-off costs relating to the
87.9 in Q4 2015.
•
Expense ratio of 15.3 (14.6) and
efficiency programme. The total effect of weather
14.9 (15.3) before one-off effects
claims, large claims and run-off was somewhat
•
Investment return, after transfer to
higher than in 2014. A slightly negative develop-
insurance, of DKK -5m (DKK 360m)
ment was observed during the year, especially for
•
Proposed dividend of DKK 3.5 per share
the property lines across the different business
and DKK 6.0 when including H1 dividend
•
DKK 1bn share buy back completed and a
new DKK 1bn programme planned in 2016
areas, and this will be mitigated through price
increases to the tune of 3% and new targeted
claims assessment initiatives in 2016.
Customer targets
DKKm
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Retention rate
Customers with ≥3 products (%)
| Contents – Management’s review
CMD
(Nov. 2014)
11
87.9
56.3
2015
22
88.1
56.7
Target
2017
22
88.9
61.3
10
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
As part of Tryg’s customer focus, Commercial
Council recommended Tryg’s new car insurance
We know that many customers prefer self-service
development in the portfolio. Corporate posted
radically changed its structure in 2015 through
product as being ‘Best in Test’. Tryg also launched
solutions, and we have therefore developed a self-
premium growth of 0.0% (1.1%) in local currencies.
increased empowerment of the front-line organi-
new house insurance, travel insurance, accident
service solution for our most important product,
For this business area, Tryg is prepared for more
sation and a reduction in back-office functions.
insurance and pet insurance products in Norway,
motor, in both Denmark and Norway, which allows
substantial fluctuations in premium income due to
This change will support first-contact resolution by
while in Denmark we launched a new accident
customers to register their current kilometre read-
the competitive situation and the focus on having a
removing a lot of unnecessary stops in connection
insurance product along with many products for
ings and yearly mileages.
profitable portfolio. The Swedish business saw a 3.1%
with the selling of insurance. In Q4, Commercial
our largest affinity agreement, including house,
(-7.4%) drop in premium income in local currencies.
also introduced Tryg Plus for commercial custom-
pet and motorcycle insurance.
Claims reporting is one of the most important
After the implementation of significant structural
ers with many customer advantages.
parameters for customers, and in Q4 a solution for
changes in recent years, the Swedish business gener-
Within Private, many new initiatives were intro-
Smart motor app, which from the start has re-
launched in Denmark. Tryg will continue to develop
levels under the distribution agreement with Nordea.
In Q4 2015, Moderna launched the Moderna
the digital reporting of private contents claims was
ated higher-level sales in 2015 compared to sales
duced to improve first-contact resolution through
ceived much attention from customers and gener-
user-friendly solutions in 2016. To increase the
new customer centre workflows. In Denmark,
ated very strong sales. The app records the driver’s
number of products per customer, Tryg will also,
In Norway, Tryg’s child insurance was acclaimed
a significant improvement was achieved, with a
driving style, and the car insurance price is
as part of the digitalisation programme, encourage
as Best in Test by the Norwegian Family Economy
first-contact resolution rate of 83% being realised,
then differentiated accordingly.
customers to buy new products through Tryg’s ‘My
(Norsk Familieøkonomi). In 2015, Tryg made an agree-
which is close to the target of 90%. In Private
page’ online solution in both Denmark and Norway.
ment to acquire Skandia’s child insurance portfolio.
Norway, first-contact resolution stood at 75%,
In 2015, a number of old products were converted
and with many initiatives in the pipeline for 2016.
to new and more up-to-date products. The conver-
Premiums
The portfolio is worth around SEK 250m, and the trans-
action is expected to take effect in H1 2016. Tryg gen-
sion process was generally successful with a high
Premium income totalled DKK 17,977m
erally views child insurance as a future growth area.
In 2015, Tryg also had a strong focus on claims
hit rate. In 2016, the conversion of products will be
(DKK 18,652m), representing a fall of 0.8% (-1.1%)
prevention. In 2014, Tryg was the first insurance
a very im portant focus area. Tryg will convert almost
when measured in local currencies. The develop-
Claims
company to start offering synthetic DNA marking
1 million insurance policies in 2016 primarily within
ment in premium income improved for Private and
The gross claims ratio was 75.4 (67.8), with a claims
in Denmark. The scheme was further rolled out
the main areas of activity – motor, house and ac-
Sweden, but was somewhat lower for Commercial
ratio, net of ceded business, which covers both claims
in both Denmark and Norway in 2015 with good
cident. This will contribute to increasing efficiency
and Corporate. In 2015, Private saw an improved
and business ceded as a percentage of gross pre-
results, leading to a significant drop in break-ins in
as old products can then be phased out. It also
development trend, and the development in both
miums, of 71.5 (69.6). The claims level was positively
the targeted areas and also very positive customer
ensures that em ployees will only have one product
customer numbers and sales improved in 2015 rela -
impacted by the efficiency programme in the amount
responses, which attracted new customers to Tryg.
to consider in their advisory and claims handling
tive to 2014. The improvements were primarily due
of DKK 105m due to combination of the improved
functions.
to a strengthened customer focus and new price-
procurement of claims services and claims administra-
The development of price-differentiated products
differen tiated products with improved coverage,
tion. The net impact from weather claims, large claims
continued in 2015, and in March Tryg launched
Digitalisation is a key strategic initiative for Tryg.
which had a positive effect on the development in
and run-off impacted the claims ratio negatively by
a new car insurance product in Denmark. This
In 2015, Tryg further increased the number of
premium income. Premium income in Commercial
0.1 percentage points. Apart from this, an increase
was the most important product launch since the
customers we contact digitally, both in our daily
was down by 2.9% (-3.0%) in local currencies. In
was seen in the level of medium-sized claims as well
start of Tryg’s strategic initiative to develop price-
dealings with customers, but also as part of pre-
2015, the Commercial retention rate improved in
as a higher claims level especially for the property
differentiated products in 2012. The new product
paring for the customer bonus scheme. Tryg has
Denmark, but dropped in Norway. There is a general
lines across the different areas. The development
improved Tryg’s competitive position in this very
digitalised 80% of its Danish and more than 60%
need to improve the balance between sales and
in property insurance claims will be offset by minor
important market, and the Danish Consumer
of its Norwegian customers.
retention rates in Commercial to achieve a positive
price adjustments, but also through improved quality
| Contents – Management’s review
11
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
control for certain types of claims such as, for exam-
Large claims amounted to 3.4% (3.1%) in 2015
The return on the match portfolio was DKK 1m
6,193m at the end of 2015, and is measured based
ple, claims relating to pipes. Tryg saw an increase
and weather claims to 3.4% (2.4%). Large claims
(DKK 181m) after transfer to insurance tech nical
on the adequate capital base, which amounted to
in such claims in 2015. We also saw an increase in
and weather claims totalled DKK 1,227m, which
interest. The return on the free investment portfolio
DKK9,525m. After recognition of a share buy back
the level of travel insurance claims, highlighting the
is somewhat higher than the average level of
was DKK 232m (DKK 548m). The return on the
in 2015, Tryg’s surplus cover is DKK 3,332m,
fact that the price increases introduced in August
DKK 1,050m a year. The run-off level stood at 6.7%
equity portfolio was positive at 3.4%, which was
corresponding to 54%.
2014 in connection with the extension of cover
(6.1%), which underlines Tryg’s solid provisions.
significantly lower than in 2014, which saw a return
for health-related issues no longer covered under
of 10% and was impacted by a volatile develop-
Tryg’s capital adequacy calculation includes approxi-
the public health insurance schemes were too low.
Expenses
ment for equities especially in Q3, which saw a sig-
mately NOK 1.2bn after tax from the Norwegian
This development will be mitigated through price
The expense ratio was 15.3 (14.6). Adjusted for
nificant drop leading to a negative return of 10.3%.
Na t ural Perils Pool and the Norwegian guarantee
adjustments.
one-off costs of DKK 120m relating to the ef-
Bonds produced a negative return of 0.1% (2.1%),
scheme. On 26 August 2015, the Norwegian Ministry
ficiency programme, the expense ratio was 14.9
with the total return being impacted especially by a
of Justice and Public Security started a consultation
The claims-related measures implemented in 2015
and in line with the target of an expense ratio
negative return of 0.6% on covered bonds.
in relation to the use of the Norwegian Natural Perils
included improved agreements on the procure-
below 15 in 2015.
Pool (NNP) as an Own Funds item under the Solv-
ment of claims services within contents insurance,
Profit/loss on discontinued business
ency II scheme. The most important message in the
including an agreement with Scalepoint and the
The efficiency programme contributed DKK 60m
A profit of DKK 49m (DKK 10m) was realised
consultation material is that the classification of the
gradual implementation of the IN4MO system for
in 2015, corresponding to an impact on the ex-
on discontinued business, comprising gains
Natural Perils Pool will be allowed as a Tier 2 capital
the management of all processes and deliveries in
pense ratio of 0.3 percentage points. The initiatives
on provisions, primarily relating to the marine
item. Tryg expects a final solution to be announced in
connection with building claims. Most agreements
comprised cuts in Finance and IT as part of the
run-off business.
with claims service companies are based on a
outsourcing programme, but the changed
general model of fixed prices for specific tasks. This
Commercial structure also had a positive impact.
Tax
Q1 2016. The inclusion of the Natural Perils Pool as
Tier 2 capital will lead to a potential for issuing future
subordinated debt of approximately DKK 1bn.
approach is easy to manage and encourages the
Going forward, outsourcing in the various business
Tax on profit for the year totalled DKK 395m, or 17%
swift handling of reported claims.
areas will play an important role in meeting the
of the profit before tax. The relatively low tax rate was
On 2 January 2015, Tryg initiated a buy back of own
DKK 250m target for the period up until 2017.
due to a lower Norwegian tax rate and a merger of
shares for an amount of DKK 1,000m, which was
Tryg renewed a horizontal reinsurance agreement
Tryg’s property com panies, which meant that a tax
finalised on 18 December 2015.
for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.
In 2015, the number of employees was reduced
deficit in one of Tryg’s properties could be utilised.
In the event of total storm and cloudburst claims
from 3,599 to 3,359.
In 2015, Tryg paid DKK 765m in income tax as well
As earlier mentioned, Tryg has acquired Skandia’s
expenses in excess of DKK 300m, the agreement
as various payroll taxes totalling DKK 362m, result-
child insurance portfolio. This will lead to a capital
will cover the next DKK 600m. Only claims events
Investment return
ing in total tax payments of DKK 1.127m in 2015.
impact of DKK 400-500m, both due to the price paid
in excess of DKK 20m are covered by the agree-
The investment return was negative by DKK 5m
for the portfolio and the capital requirement relating
ment. In H2 2015, storm and cloudburst claims
(DKK 360m) in 2015. The match portfolio totalled
Capital position
to the portfolio.
totalled approximately DKK 190m, which means
DKK 28.1bn and is made up of bonds which match
Tryg’s equity totalled DKK 9,831m (DKK 11,119m)
that after claims for another approximately
the insurance provisions so that fluctuations re-
at the end of 2015. Tryg determines the individual
In general, Tryg wants to acquire small portfolios
DKK 110m, the agreement will provide cover
sulting from interest rate changes are offset to the
solvency requirement according to the Danish
which can be integrated in an effective way and sup-
in H1 2016.
greatest possible extent. At 31 December 2015,
Financial Supervisory Authority’s guidelines.
port Tryg’s financial targets over a three-year horizon,
the value of the free portfolio totalled DKK 10.7bn.
The individual solvency requirement was DKK
supporting a return on equity of 21%.
| Contents – Management’s review
12
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | The transition to Solvency II from 1 January 2016
Results for Q4 2015
Claims
The number of employees was further reduced
will have a positive impact on Tryg’s capital
The profit after tax totalled DKK 721m
The gross claims ratio was 68.0 (64.1), with a
in the quarter by 66 full-time employees, leaving
pos ition. Tryg has a Solvency II ratio of 176 on
(DKK 640m) based on a technical result of
claims ratio, net of ceded business, which covers
3,359 full-time employees at the end of the year.
1 January 2016.
Dividend policy
DKK 522m (DKK 775m) and an investment
both claims and business ceded as a percentage
result of DKK 201m (DKK 13m).
of gross premiums, of 74.2 (68.8). The higher
Investments
level of claims can be ascribed especially to a high
The investment return was DKK 201m (DKK 13m)
According to Tryg’s dividend policy, the aim is
Profit after tax was positively affected by the on-
level of weather claims of 5.4% (2.6%). Sweep-
with a result from the match portfolio of DKK
for the dividend to be steadily increased. For H2
going efficiency programme which had an impact
ing across Denmark at the end of November, the
44m (DKK 39m), a result from the free portfolio
2015, a dividend of DKK 3.5 per share is proposed,
of DKK 32m in the quarter. The investment income
storm Gorm resulted in claims of approximately
of DKK 201m (154m) and other financial income
corres ponding to a total dividend per share based
rebounded somewhat from the very negative de-
DKK 120m, while the flooding caused by the storm
and expenses totalling DKK -44m. The high return
on the 2015 results of DKK 6 (DKK 5.8), represent-
velopment in Q3 2015 with a result of DKK 201m.
Synne in Norway at the beginning of December led
on the free portfolio was due to a rebound in the
ing total dividend payments of DKK 1,759 or 89%
The net effect of weather claims, large claims and
to claims of approximately NOK 215m, of which
equity market reflected in a return on equities of
of the profit for the year.
run-off was up by 3 percentage points in the
Tryg covers approximately NOK 23m. In addition
DKK 111m (DKK 75m) or 4.5% (3.2%). The return
quarter, with weather claims being especially high.
to these specific weather claims came the usual
on Investment property was DKK 71m (DKK 50m)
In 2015, a DKK 1bn share buy back was com-
The claims level was also impacted by a higher
winter claims, especially in Norway. The high level
following a positive revaluation for some invest-
pleted, and Tryg has planned a DKK 1bn share buy
claims level from the property lines across the
of weather claims means that Tryg will be covered
ment properties.
back programme once approved by the Danish
different business areas.
under a horizontal reinsurance agreement after
Financial Supervisory Authority.
further weather claims of DKK 110m.
Premiums
The total yield for shareholders was 6.9% in 2015.
Premiums developed negatively by 1.6% (-0.1%) in
In Q4, claims levels generally remained high for
Financial highlights Q4 2015
local currencies. In Private, the positive develop-
the property lines, which will be mitigated through
Events after balance sheet date
ment continued with growth of 1.1% (-0.2%) in
minor price adjustments and claims initiatives.
The introduction of Solvency II will have a signifi-
local currencies, reflecting both a strong develop-
Claims initiatives will include more thorough in-
• Profit after tax of DKK 721m (DKK 640m)
•
Technical result of DKK 522m (DKK 775m)
cant impact on Tryg’s capital position in various
ment in sales and stable retention rates. In Com-
vestigations, in particular of pipe-related claims.
• Combined ratio of 88.4 (83.7)
areas and will be taken in to account as of 1 January
mercial, premiums dropped by 5.0% (-1.8%) in lo-
2016.
Read more on in the section Capital and risk
cal currencies, reflecting a competitive Norwegian
Expenses
•
Weather claims impacting the combined
ratio by 5.4 percentage points (2.6)
management on pages 24-25 and
Download the
market which was also impacted by the economic
The expense ratio was 14.2 (14.9).The efficiency
•
Large claims impacting the combined
newsletter at Tryg.com
situation, whereas Commercial in Denmark saw
programme contributed DKK 15m in the quarter,
ratio by 3.1 percentage points (4.3)
stable development but was impacted by the in-
corresponding to an impact on the expense ratio
• Expense ratio of 14.2 (14.9)
In the opinion of Management, from the balance
dividual regulation of a number of large accounts.
of 0.3 percentage points. Apart from the contri-
•
Investment return of DKK 201m
sheet date to the present date no other matters
In Corporate, premium growth was negative at
bution from the efficiency programme, the low
(DKK 13m)
of major significance have arisen that are likely
2.1% (1.5%) in local currencies, reflecting a more
expense ratio was also due to the organisation’s
•
Proposed dividend of DKK 3.5 per share
to materially influence the assessment of the
competitive Norwegian market. The Swedish
efforts to meet the overall target for 2015 of an
and DKK 6.0 when including H1 dividend
company’s financial position.
business saw a drop in premium income of 6.1%
expense ratio below 15.
(1.6%) in local currencies following the termination
of a large affinity agreement.
•
DKK 1bn share buy back completed and a
new DKK 1bn programme planned in 2016
| Contents – Management’s review
13
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Private
retention rate dropped from 87.0 to 86.4 due to the
storm Gorm in Denmark but also flooding in Norway
above-mentioned developments in the Norwegian
and higher claims levels for some lines of business.
economy and the competitive market situation.
House insurance saw a particularly negative
Sales and customer numbers developed positively,
development in claims, as did some minor lines of
which can also be ascribed to the increased cus tomer
business such as travel insurance. Tryg constantly
focus. Sales in Denmark were 7% higher than in 2014,
monitors developments in claims, and steps are
and Norwegian sales were also slightly higher, especi-
taken to counter any consistently negative trends.
ally due to strong sales via the franchise sales channel.
Initiatives will often be a combination of minor
Private encompasses the sale of insurance products
in premiums was slightly positive and improved
price adjustments and claims prevention.
to private individuals in Denmark and Norway. Sales
compared to 2014. Adjusted for the one-off effects
Claims
are effected via call centres, the Internet, Tryg’s own
in 2014 of Norwegian pension and IT costs, the
The gross claims ratio amounted to 69.0 (67.7), with a
Expenses
agents, franchisees (Norway), interest organisations,
expense ratio improved by 0.6 percentage points.
claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 70.7 (68.0). The
The expense ratio was 14.7 (14.5). Adjusted for the
car dealers, estate agents and Nordea’s branches.
increase was ascribable to the efficiency programme
one-off effects of the Norwegian pension scheme
The business area accounts for 49% of the Group’s
Premiums
and a higher level of weather claims related to the
and the change of IT suppliers in 2014, the expense
total premium income.
Results
The development in gross premium income improved
by 0.3% in local currencies against an unchanged level
in 2014 and a 2.2% drop in 2013. Premiums increased
Key figures – Private
The technical result for 2015 was DKK 1,298m
by 0.4% in Denmark, which was very satisfactory
(DKK 1,612m), with a combined ratio of 85.4
given also that the average price of the motor product
(82.5). The development was attributable to a
fell by a further 2.6 percentage points due to higher
combination of a positive impact from the ef-
sales of smaller and safer cars. In Norway, premium
ficiency programme, a higher level of weather
income increased by 0.3% in local currencies, which
claims and a higher level of claims especially from
was acceptable, considering the competitive market
the property lines of business. The development
situation and the weakened Norwegian economy.
Financial highlights 2015
•
Technical result of DKK 1,298m
(DKK 1,612m)
• Combined ratio of 85.4 (82.5)
•
Gross premiums in local currencies
increased by 0.3% (0.0%)
• Expense ratio of 14.7 (14.5)
| Contents – Management’s review
The improved premium development can be ascribed
to a strong customer focus, which has resulted in a
significant improvement in the Net Promoter Score
(NPS) from 21 in 2014 to 26 in 2015. The develop-
ment was significant in both Denmark and Norway.
In Denmark, the NPS improved from 25 to 29, while
an improvement from 15 to 22 was seen in Norway.
The development in the NPS also supported a posi-
tive development in the retention rate in Denmark,
which improved from 89.6 to 89.9. In Norway, the
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross expenses
2,172
-1,548
-290
2,249
-1,468
-337
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Premium growth in local currencies
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Run-off, net of reinsurance (%)
Large claims, net of reinsurance (%)
Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%)
334
-51
2
285
49
1.1
71.3
2.3
73.6
13.4
87.0
-2.3
0.4
7.6
444
-48
4
400
47
-0.2
65.3
2.1
67.4
15.0
82.4
-2.1
0.0
2.6
2015
8,803
-6,074
-1,291
1,438
-148
8
1,298
324
0.3
69.0
1.7
70.7
14.7
85.4
-3.7
0.3
4.5
2014
9,051
-6,129
-1,311
1,611
-23
24
1,612
357
0.0
67.7
0.3
68.0
14.5
82.5
-3.9
0.1
2.5
14
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
ratio improved by 0.6 percentage points. This
a competitive market situation and the weakened
development was the result of a consistent focus
Norwegian economy. The positive development in
on improving expense levels, and in 2015 outsour-
the NPS continued in Q4 with an improvement of
cing initiatives were implemented in Private. The
1 point to 29 in Denmark and an unchanged level of
initiatives centred on reducing expense levels in the
22 in Norway. The positive development in customer
back-office functions and improving sales efficiency
numbers continued with a significant increase in
through improved management and training.
Denmark and a slight reduction in Norway. Sales were
The number of employees was reduced from 903
channels contributed positively to the development,
at the end of 2014 to 837 in 2015, mainly through
and in Norway the franchise sales channel posted
job cuts in the administration.
consistently high sales levels.
high in both Denmark and Norway. In Denmark, all
Financial highlights Q4 2015
The retention rate in Denmark increased to 89.9
(89.6), and the retention rate in Norway was 86.4
(87.0). The high level in Denmark was probably partly
•
Technical result of DKK 285m
due to awareness of the customer bonus that will be
(DKK 400m)
implemented from spring 2016.
• Combined ratio of 87.0 (82.4)
• Claims ratio, net of ceded business,
Claims
of 73.6 (67.4)
The gross claims ratio was 71.3 (65.3), and the
• Expense ratio of 13.4 (15.0)
claims ratio, net of ceded business, was 73.6 (67.4).
Results Q4 2015
The high level was primarily due to the weather in
Denmark and Norway. A storm in Denmark resulted
in more than 9,000 claims, and in Norway severe
The technical result totalled DKK 285m (DKK 400m),
flooding caused damage of an estimated NOK 215m
with a combined ratio of 87.0 (82.4), and was
for the market as a whole, on top of which came the
negatively affected by a significantly higher level
impact from winter claims. We saw a slight increase
of weather claims than in 2014. The expense level
in property claims in Denmark, which underpins the
was very low at 13.4 (15.0).
importance of implementing both price and claims
prevention initiatives from 2016.
Premiums
Gross premiums increased by 1.1% (-0.2%) in local
Expenses
currencies. Premium growth in Denmark was 2.6%,
In Denmark, the expense ratio was 13.4 (15.0),
partly due to a low level of bonus and premium
reflecting a strong focus on efficiency and a lower
rebates, while premium growth in Norway was
level of commissions and marketing spend. The
negative at -0.7% in local currencies, still reflecting
number of employees was reduced by 15 in Q4.
Prevention creates peace of mind and increases sales Tryg is the
first insurance company to actively use DNA marking in an effort to
prevent break-ins.
The DNA marking technology consists of an
the home-owners using DNA marking. Tryg
invisible and synthetic liquid which can be
extended the trial to Norway, distributing
applied to all valuables. The liquid is visible
DNA kits to 280 households in Hasleåsen in
under UV light and cannot be removed.
Sandefjord, another residential area plagued
by high break-in rates. In addition to reducing
Tryg first carried out a trial in a residential
the number of break-ins, the initiative has
district in the town of Sønderborg in southern
attracted more than 50 new customers in
Denmark with a particularly high incidence
the area.
of break-ins, and 90 residents said yes to the
DNA kit. Police data show that the number
Studies show that synthetic DNA marking
of break-ins in the Sønderborg area in general
has a clearly preventive effect on burglary
has fallen by 26%, while Tryg’s data from the
rates.
Read more about Tryg’s DNA
test area show a 53% decline in break-ins for
marking initiative at tryg.dk.
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
15
Commercial
The development in sales improved in 2015, which
lines of business. The very high level of large claims
can also be ascribed to the increased customer focus
related to fires in both Denmark and Norway.
during the year. Sales in Denmark were 2 percent-
age points higher than in 2014, and in Norway
The high level of property claims was, among other
sales were also at a slightly higher level, especially
things, also due to an increase in fire-related claims,
due to strong sales via the franchise sales channel.
especially in Denmark and Norway. The agriculture
Overall, the sales level was, however, too low to
segment also saw a high level of claims. Based on
secure stable premium growth through the year.
the development in property, selective price adjust-
ments will be initiated.
Commercial encompasses the sale of insurance
Adjusted for the one-off effects of the Norwegian
Claims
products to small and medium-sized businesses in
pension and IT costs in 2014, the expense ratio was
The gross claims ratio amounted to 65.4 (63.8),
Expenses
Denmark and Norway. Sales are effected by Tryg’s
at a slightly higher level.
with a claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 66.5
The expense ratio was 17.1 (15.8). Adjusted for the
own sales force, brokers, franchisees (Norway),
(63.6). The higher level was ascribable to a com-
one-off effects of the Norwegian pension scheme
customer centres and through group agreements.
Premiums
bination of higher weather and large claims and
and the change of IT suppliers in 2014, the expense
The business area accounts for 22% of the Group’s
The development in gross premium income was
a higher claims level, especially for the property
ratio increased slightly by 0.2 percentage points.
total premium income.
Results
negative by 2.9% in local currencies, which was in
line with the development in 2014, but at the same
time an unsatisfactory development. Premiums de-
The technical result for 2015 was DKK 658m
creased by around 2.6% in Denmark, due to a gen-
(DKK 875m), with a combined ratio of 83.6 (79.4).
erally competitive market situation and selective
The combined ratio was negatively affected by
price hikes. In Norway, premium income declined
a higher level of weather and large claims and a
by 3.6% in local currencies due to the competitive
higher level of claims from especially property lines
situation and the weakened Norwegian economy.
of business. The development in premiums was
negative with a reduction of 2.9% (-3.0%) and was
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) improved from 0 in
more or less in line with the development in 2014.
2014 to 12 in 2015. The development in the NPS
was significant in both Denmark and Norway. In
Denmark, the NPS improved from 5 to 18, and in
Norway an improvement from -11 to -1 was seen.
The development in the NPS also supported a posi-
tive development in the retention rate in Denmark,
which improved from 87.0 to 87.9. In Norway, the
retention rate fell slightly due to the above-men-
tioned development in the Norwegian economy
and a competitive market situation.
Financial highlights 2015
•
Technical result of DKK 658m
(DKK 875m)
• Combined ratio of 83.6 (79.4)
• Gross premiums reduced by 2.9% (-3.0%)
• Expense ratio of 17.1 (15.8)
| Contents – Management’s review
Key figures – Commercial
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross expenses
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Premium growth in local currencies
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Run-off, net of reinsurance (%)
Large claims, net of reinsurance (%)
Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%)
970
-604
-167
199
-53
1
147
61
-5.0
62.3
5.5
67.8
17.2
85.0
-6.3
1.9
4.8
1,050
-580
-164
306
-39
3
270
126
-1.8
55.2
3.7
58.9
15.6
74.5
-12.0
4.2
2.6
2015
3,992
-2,612
-683
697
-44
5
658
388
-2.9
65.4
1.1
66.5
17.1
83.6
-9.7
6.7
2.8
2014
4,190
-2,673
-664
853
8
14
875
310
-3.0
63.8
-0.2
63.6
15.8
79.4
-7.4
4.3
1.9
16
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
This development was a result of a consistent
and the weakened Norwegian economy. The posi-
focus on improving expense levels, which,
tive development in the NPS continued in Q4 with
however, could not fully make up for the drop
an improvement to 18 from 15 in Q3 in Denmark
in premium income.
and an improvement in Norway to -1 from -4 in
Q3. Sales were higher than in the prior-year quarter
The number of employees was reduced from
in both Denmark and Norway.
559 at the end of 2014 to 527 in 2015 following a
restructuring move seeing greater empowerment
In Denmark, the increase was generated in par-
of front-line staff and job cuts among the adminis-
ticular by the partner channel, while sales via the
trative personnel.
Financial highlights Q4 2015
•
Technical result of DKK 147m
(DKK 270m)
• Combined ratio of 85.0 (74.5)
franchise sales channel remained at a high level
in Norway, whereas sales by agents were at a low
level. However, the challenge is still that sales are
too low to outweigh the decline in retention levels
in Norway, which led to a drop in premium income.
The retention rate in Denmark increased to
87.9 (87.0), while the retention rate in Norway
• Claims ratio, net of ceded business,
was 87.1 (87.8).
of 67.8 (58.9)
• Expense ratio of 17.2 (15.6)
Claims
Results Q4 2015
The gross claims ratio was 62.3 (55.2), with a
claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 67.8 (58.9).
The high level was primarily due to the weather in
The technical result totalled DKK 147m (DKK 270m),
both Denmark and Norway. Denmark was hit by
with a combined ratio of 85.0 (74.5), and was nega-
a storm, and in Norway flooding caused damage
tively affected by a significant increase in weather
worth an estimated NOK 215m for the market as
claims relative to 2014. Premium growth was nega-
a whole, on top of which came the impact from
tive by 5.0% (-1.8%). The expense level was 17.2
winter claims. Q4 2015 also saw an increase in
(15.6) following the drop in premium income.
property claims levels for Commercial.
Premiums
Expenses
Gross premiums dropped by 5.0% (-1.8%) in local
In Denmark, the expense ratio was 17.2 (15.6),
currencies with a drop in Denmark of 5.8% and
primarily due to reduced premiums. The number
a drop in Norway of 2.8% in local currencies as a
of employees was reduced by 21 to 527 in Q4.
result of the competitive market situation in general
| Contents – Management’s review
Fire at Copenhagen Experimentarium: Fast and professional handling.
In April 2015, a fire broke out at one of the most popular tourist
attractions in Denmark, Experimentarium in Copenhagen. The damage
ran into tens of millions of Danish kroner.
“In connection with some construction
ence, and so I was extremely pleased to
work, the roof structure caught fire, and it
have Tryg on board to provide a professional
quickly became clear that one of our most
overview of the situation,” says Experimen-
popular and treasured exhibitions, the
tarium’s Executive Director Kim Gladstone
Water exhibition, was beyond rescue.
Herlev. In addition to covering the actual
At the emergency meeting held the following
relevant parties and provided advice and
day, I was still severely shaken by the experi-
guidance on the handling of the situation.
claims, Tryg handled the dialogue with the
Ø
S
K
O
R
B
E
T
T
E
M
:
O
T
O
H
P
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
17
Corporate
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) was also implemented
Claims
in Corporate in 2015 and generally with good results.
The gross claims ratio amounted to 102.4 (71.2),
In Denmark, the NPS was 15, and in Norway 20. In
with a claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 79.9
Sweden, the NPS has not been implemented, but
(78.7). The high claims level was due to a high level
for the third year running, Swedish brokers ranked
of large claims, and claims relating to business
Corporate Sweden as the best company.
interruption were generally at a high level. Because
of this development, Corporate will be implement-
Corporate had a particular focus on international
ing price adjustments for the property business.
customers in 2015 and made arrangements with
Corporate sells insurance products to corporate
by somewhat higher capital requirements. To
some large international customers in coopera-
In Denmark, the motor line of business developed
customers under the brands ‘Tryg’ in Denmark and
contribute to Tryg’s overall ambition of a return of
tion with both the AXA network and some large
negatively, with a high claims frequency, which will
Norway, ‘Moderna’ in Sweden and ‘Tryg Garanti’.
equity of 21%, Corporate must therefore realise a
European reinsurance groups. The international
also lead to the introduction of targeted initiatives
Sales are effected both via Tryg’s own sales force
lower combined ratio than the Tryg Group. In that
business accounts for around 15% of Corporate
such as higher excess and price increases.
and via insurance brokers. Moreover, customers
respect, the results are not satisfactory.
premium income.
with international insurance needs are served by
Corporate through its cooperation with the AXA
The moderate development in premiums seen in re-
Group. The business area accounts for 22% of
cent years continued in 2015 at an unchanged level
the Group’s total premium income.
(1.1%), measured in local currencies. This was an
Key figures – Corporate
acceptable development in a year impacted, among
other things, by the weakened Norwegian economy.
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
Results
The technical result for 2015 was DKK 369m
(DKK 427m), with a combined ratio of 90.7 (89.8).
Adjusted for the one-off effects of the Norwegian
The result was negatively affected by a high level
pension and IT costs in 2014, the expense ratio
of large claims and a lower level of run-off. With a
was at a significantly lower level.
higher proportion of long-tailed business than the
other business areas, Corporate is characterised
Premiums
The development in gross premium income was
unchanged compared to 2014 in local currencies.
Premiums increased by around 1.6% in Denmark,
whereas in Norway premium income declined by
3.3% in local currencies due to the competitive
market situation, especially for the broker channel,
and the weakened Norwegian economy. In Sweden,
which accounts for only 20% of the total Corporate
business, continued growth of 6.2% in local
currencies was posted.
Financial highlights 2015
•
Technical result of DKK 369m
(DKK 427m)
• Combined ratio of 90.7 (89.8)
• Gross premiums unchanged (1.1%)
• Expense ratio of 10.8 (11.1)
| Contents – Management’s review
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross expenses
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Premium growth in local currencies
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Run-off, net of reinsurance (%)
Large claims, net of reinsurance (%)
Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%)
949
-657
-92
200
-195
0
5
65
-2.1
69.2
20.5
89.7
9.7
99.4
-6.8
11.3
2.0
1,015
-682
-108
225
-128
1
98
162
1.5
67.2
12.6
79.8
10.6
90.4
-16.0
15.4
2.9
2015
3,894
-3,987
-420
-513
877
5
369
351
0.0
102.4
-22.5
79.9
10.8
90.7
-9.0
8.2
2.2
2014
4,033
-2,872
-446
715
-304
16
427
421
1.1
71.2
7.5
78.7
11.1
89.8
-10.4
9.4
3.0
18
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
In the Swedish business, profitability was im-
and a significantly lower level of run-off compared
proved through a number of initiatives. In 2015,
to Q4 2014. Premium growth was negative by
a negative development was, however, also seen
2.1% (1.5%). The expense level was very low at
in the motor lines in Sweden where the portfolio
9.7 (10.6), reflecting a strong cost focus.
of large trucks, in particular, showed an increasing
claims trend. Substantial selected price hikes will
Premiums
therefore be introduced in this segment.
Gross premiums dropped by 2.1% (1.5%) in local
Expenses
currencies based on an increase in Denmark
of 2.0% and an 8.1% drop in local currencies in
The expense ratio was 10.8 (11.1). Adjusted for
Norway, still reflecting a competitive market
the one-off effects of the Norwegian pension
situation and the weakened Norwegian economy.
scheme and the change of IT suppliers in 2014,
Competition remains more pronounced in the
the expense ratio improved by 0.8 percentage
broker channel, in Norway another sign of the
points. This was achieved through a continued
weakened Norwegian economy. In addition, the
focus on improving expense levels, and in 2015
quarter was also affected by volume adjustments
Corporate also started a number of outsourcing
under a number of major agreements.
initiatives aimed reducing expense levels in the
back-office functions.
The quarter was, as always, impacted by the
preparations for the renewals process starting
The number of employees was reduced from
on 1 January 2016, where approximately 48%
279 at the end of 2014 to 265 in 2015.
of customers are renewed.
New and more flexible car insurance In March 2015, Tryg launched
a brand new car product.
Financial highlights Q4 2015
• Technical result of DKK 5m (DKK 98m)
Customers are automatically granted elite
Council TÆNK carried out a review of car
• Combined ratio of 99.4 (90.4)
status once they reach the age of 30 and
insurance policies from 11 different com-
• Claims ratio, net of ceded business,
after three years of no claims. In addition
panies, which resulted inTryg coming out
of 89.7 (79.8)
to good basic cover, our new car insurance
Best in Test. Tryg’s car insurance product
• Expense ratio of 9.7 (10.6)
product also offers a number of new types
was named the best in the market based on
of optional covers, allowing customers to
a combined value-for-money rating of price
tailor their insurance to their exact needs.
and cover.
Read more about the car
In June 2015, the Danish Consumer
insurance at tryg.dk.
Claims
The gross claims ratio was 69.2 (67.2), with a
claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 89.7 (79.8).
The high level was primarily due to a high level of
large and medium-sized claims. Claims level, were
high for property in both Denmark and Norway,
whereas in Sweden motor insurance claims
were high.
Expenses
Results Q4 2015
The expense ratio was 9.7 (10.6), reflecting
The technical result totalled DKK 5m (DKK 98m),
a strong focus on efficiency, and was achieved
with a combined ratio of 99.4 (90.4), and was
despite a drop in premium income. The number
negatively affected by a high level of large claims
of employees was reduced by 5 in Q4.
| Contents – Management’s review
| Contents – Management’s review
19
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Sweden
In Q4 2015, Moderna launched an app, Moderna
mination of the agreements with both Nordea and
Smart, which from the start has received much
Villaägerne, where profitability was not satisfactory.
attention from customers and generated very
high sales.
Claims
Expenses
The expense ratio was 18.7 (19.2) or 18.8 in 2014
excluding one-off effects. The lower expense level
The gross claims ratio amounted to 64.7 (71.3),
can be ascribed to a more efficient sales set-up and
with a claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 64.8
the restructuring of the business to include one
(72.8). The significant improvement can be ascribed
call centre as well as a generally strong focus on
Sweden comprises the sale of insurance products
harmonisation of the reserving models across
to the harmonisation of the claims reserving model,
efficiency.
to private customers under the ‘Moderna’ brand.
Tryg. Premium income dropped by 3.1% (-7.4%),
which led to a high level of run-off gains in 2015.
Moreover, insurance is sold under the brands
which was a significant improvement compared
Weather claims were at a slightly higher level. In
The number of employees was 333 at the end of
Atlantica, Bilsport & MC, Securator and Moderna
with 2014.
general, the claims ratio improved due to the ter-
2015, down 49 from 382 at the end of 2014.
Djurförsäkringar. Sales are effected via Tryg’s own
salespeople, call centres and online. The business
In 2015, the new structure with only one call
area accounts for 7% of the Group’s total premium
centre in Malmö was fully implemented, and
income.
Results
the acquired company Securator, which insures
electrical goods, and the pet insurance portfolio,
which was also acquired in 2014, were fully
Key figures – Sweden
Sweden’s results have improved significantly in
integrated.
recent years, and a strong result of DKK 218m
was posted for 2015. The combined ratio was
Premiums
83.5 (92.0) and was impacted by a very high
Premium income declined by 3.1% (-7.4%) in local
level of run-off gains of DKK 149m due to the
currencies. The improved development was due to
high sales, which were even higher than when Tryg
had the partner agreement with Nordea. There
was a strong performance by all sales channels
– inbound, web, aggregator and the niche sales
channels. The strong sales performance has
mitigated the effects of the reduction in the port-
folio following the termination of the agreement
with Nordea and Villaägerne. In Q4 2015, the
portfolio was further impacted by the termination
of the agreement with the ICA supermarket chain.
Sales of pet insurance were at a high level in 2015,
this being a significant growth segment.
Financial highlights 2015
•
Technical result of DKK 218m
(DKK118m)
• Combined ratio of 83.5 (92.0)
• Gross premiums reduced by 3.1% (-7.4%)
• Expense ratio of 18.7 (19.2)
| Contents – Management’s review
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross expenses
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Premium growth in local currencies
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Run-off, net of reinsurance (%)
Weather claims, net of reinsurance (%)
313
-162
-66
85
-1
1
85
66
-6.1
51.8
0.3
52.1
21.1
73.2
-21.1
1.6
338
-252
-75
11
-5
1
7
3
1.6
74.6
1.5
76.1
22.2
98.3
-0.9
1.5
2015
1,317
-852
-246
219
-1
0
218
149
-3.1
64.7
0.1
64.8
18.7
83.5
-11.3
1.7
2014
1,399
-998
-268
133
-21
6
118
43
-7.4
71.3
1.5
72.8
19.2
92.0
-3.1
1.5
20
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Acquisition of Swedish child
insurance portfolio
In August 2015, Tryg acquired Skandia’s child
and adult insurance portfolio with a premium
volume of approximately SEK 250m. The port-
folio will be integrated into Tryg’s Swedish
branch Moderna in H1 2016.
Results Q4 2015
Claims
The technical result totalled DKK 85m (DKK 7m),
The gross claims ratio was 51.8 (74.6), with a
with a combined ratio of 73.2 (98.3), and was posi-
claims ratio, net of ceded business, of 52.1 (76.1).
tively impacted by the harmonisation of claims
The low claims ratio was due to the harmonisa -
reserving models. The harmonisation led to a run-
tion of the models used to calculate the claims
off of approximately DKK 70m. Weather claims
reserves. Since Moderna has been included in
were at a slightly higher level due to storm claims
Tryg’s common reserving models and applies
and a mild winter. Premium growth was negative
the same methods, a run-off gain of around
by 6.1% (1.6%). The expense level improved to
DKK 70m was identified.
21.1 (22.2) as a result of a strong cost focus.
Expenses
Premiums
The expense ratio was 21.1 (22.2), reflecting
Gross premiums dropped by 6.1% (1.6%), in local
a strong focus on efficiency, and was achieved
currencies which was partly due to the termination
despite a drop in premium growth. The number
of the ICA agreement from Q4 2015. The premium
of employees was reduced by 3 in Q4 2015.
development was also affected by a very low level
of activity in the niche areas – yacht insurance and
Bilsport/MC – which posted significant growth in
Q2 and Q3. The premium income for Q4 2015 was
also impacted by the above-mentioned Moderna
Smart car insurance product, the price of which is
based on how safely the customer is driving. Since
the launch, more than 1,000 customers a day have
taken out an insurance policy, and on average with
a higher insurance premium.
Financial highlights Q4 2015
• Technical result of DKK 85m (DKK 7m)
• Combined ratio of 73.2 (98.3)
• Claims ratio, net of ceded business,
of 52.1 (76.1)
• Expense ratio of 21.1 (22.2)
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
21
Investment activities
Key figures – investments
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
2015
2014
Free portfolio, gross return
Match portfolio, regulatory deviation and performance
Other financial income and expenses
Total investment return
201
44
-44
201
154
39
-180
13
232
1
-238
-5
548
181
-369
360
The purpose of Tryg’s investment activities is
of fixed income assets that match the insurance
From a Scandinavian point of view, 2015 was
and the return on the match portfolio less the
primarily to support its insurance business by
liabilities, so that fluctuations resulting from inter-
also an eventful year. The Danish, Swedish and
amount transferred to the insurance business
creating an optimum and robust return on its
est rate changes are offset to the greatest possible
Norwegian central banks lowered their lending
was DKK 1m. Deducting financial income and
capital in the long term. Through a relatively
extent. The free portfolio is primarily the Group’s
rates by 0.15 percentage points, 0.35 percentage
expenses of DKK -238m, the return on invest -
conservative and diversified approach to risk,
shareholders’ equity, which is invested in fixed
points and 0.50 percentage points, respectively.
ment activities was DKK -5m.
the overall strategy is to minimise and match
income securities with a short duration, proper-
The reduction in the Danish lending rate took
the impact from interest and exchange rate
ties, equities and some high-yield bonds.
place concurrently with a reduction in the deposit
The return of the match portfolio consists of a
fluctuations on the balance sheet.
rate of 0.75 percentage points, which still has not
regulatory deviation of DKK 29m and a perform-
Financial markets in 2015
been normalised, even though the foreign reserve
ance of DKK -28m. The positive regulatory devi-
The total market value of Tryg’s investment port-
In 2015, the financial markets were characterised
has been brought down to the normal level. While
ation was caused by the previously discussed yield
folio was DKK 38.8bn as of 31 December 2015.
by a considerable degree of volatility. Worries
short interest rates decreased during 2015, longer
difference between the FSA and local swap rates.
The investment portfolio consists of a match
about a Greek exit from the Euro zone in the first
interest rates in Denmark and Euroland went up.
The negative performance was due to the stressed
portfolio of DKK 28.1bn and a free portfolio of
half of the year, as well as Chinese devaluation and
Furthermore, the FSA yields increased more than
covered bond market in Norway in Q3.
DKK 10.7bn. The match portfolio is composed
falling growth expectations in emerging-market
local swap rates in Denmark. The Danish 10-year
nations in Q3 led to the highest level of volatility in
FSA yield increased by 0.33 percentage points,
equity markets in four to five years. This increase
while the 10-year swap rate increased by 0.19 per-
Responsible investments
Financial highlights 2015
•
Investment return of DKK -5m
(DKK 360m)
•
Net return on match portfolio of DKK 1m
(DKK 181m)
•
Gross return on free portfolio of
DKK 232m (DKK 548m)
• Volatile equity market
in market uncertainty led to substantial fluctu-
centage points. The reduction of the Nor wegian
ations in equity prices and interest rates. One
lending rate followed significant drops in the oil
driver behind this was the expected divergence
price, which has led to bleaker expectations for
of the monetary policies of the European and
the Norwegian economy. Despite the falling lend-
American central banks, the ECB and the FED.
ing rate, Norwegian covered bonds experienced
These worries became a reality in December when
the FED increased its policy rate by 0.25 percent-
Investment return 2015
significant yield increases.
age points, while the ECB lowered rates by 0.10
The total investment return in 2015 was DKK -5m.
percentage points in December.
The return on the free portfolio was DKK 232m,
Tryg uses external portfolio managers and
observes rules not to invest in controversial
activities. Together with our external man-
agers, we constantly seek to comply with
international regulations. In 2015, we have
screened for new UN and EU regulation on
certain financial sanctions against countries
and individuals.
| Contents – Management’s review
22
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Return – match portfolio
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2014
Return, match portfolio
Value adjustments, changed discount rate
Transferred to insurance technical interest
Match, regulatory deviation and performance
Hereof:
Match, regulatory deviation
Match, performance
63
45
-64
44
35
9
340
-217
-84
39
31
8
2015
140
120
-259
1
29
-28
2014
1,336
-741
-414
181
77
104
Investment activities in Q4 2015
benefitted from decreasing interest rates
Q4 was characterised by risk aversion and
coinciding with increasing FSA discounting rates.
nervousness amongst investors, stemming from
the terror attack in Paris in November as well as
In Denmark, the FSA rates just increased less than
the continuing divergence among monetary policy
the swap rates. The positive performance was due
makers. This has led to falls in commodity prices
to a positive Danish covered bonds environment.
and the associated emerging-market currencies,
Deducting financial income and expenses of
while the US dollar appreciated by almost 3% in Q4,
DKK -44m, the return on Tryg’s investment acti vities
or 12% in total in 2015. Due to our low emerging-
in Q4 was DKK 201m.
markets exposure, this only had a limited impact on
the investment result. Despite the risk aversion, the
The state of the financial markets resulted in close
Other financial income and expenses
free portfolio made the most of the positive equity
to zero returns on the equity and bond index MSCI
Other financial income and expenses amounted
market. All in all, the free portfolio provided a gross
World All Countries and the 1-year Mortgage Bond
to DKK -238m in 2015, comprising a number of
return of DKK 201m (1.8%) in Q4.
Index by Nordea, of -0.7% and 0.3%, respectively.
elements, the main ones being the expenses from
The BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield index –
the hedging of the foreign currency exposure on
In addition to the free portfolio return, the match
DKK-hedged saw a return of -5.6%. By comparison,
Tryg’s equity, consisting of DKK -60m in 2015, and
portfolio generated a net return of DKK 44m, with
the free portfolio generated an equity return of
expenses regarding Tryg’s subordinated loans of
DKK 35m coming from regulatory deviation and
DKK 91m (3.4 %) and an interest and credit exposure
DKK -86m.
return of DKK -10m (-0.1%). Investment properties
provided a net return of DKK 151m (7.2%).
DKK 9m from match performance. The positive
regulatory deviation stemmed from Norway as
well as Denmark. In Norway, our local hedge
Financial highlights Q4 2015
•
Investment return of DKK 201m
(DKK 13m)
•
Net return on match portfolio of
DKK 44m (DKK 39m)
•
Return on free portfolio of DKK 201m
(DKK 154m)
Return – free portfolio
DKKm
Q4 2015
Q4 2015 (%)
Q4 2014
Q4 2014 (%)
2015
2015 (%)
2014
2014 (%)
30.12.2015
31.12.2014
Investment assets
Government bonds
Covered bonds
Inflation linked bonds
Emerging market bonds
High-yield bonds
Other a)
Interest rate and credit exposure
Equity exposure b)
Investment property
Total gross return
4
7
-4
6
-4
10
19
111
71
201
1.6
0.2
-0.9
1.5
-0.5
1.4
0.3
4.5
3.5
1.8
9
24
0
-3
4
-5
29
75
50
154
3.3
0.5
-
-0.6
0.5
-0.5
0.4
3.2
2.4
1.2
4
-26
-1
2
-8
19
-10
91
151
232
1.4
-0.6
-0.2
0.5
-0.8
2.1
-0.1
3.4
7.2
1.9
15
78
-
23
35
17
168
250
130
548
4.7
1.6
-
5.9
5.2
1.4
2.1
10.0
6.4
4.4
a) Bank deposits and derivative financial instruments hedging interest rate risk and credit risk. b) In addition to the equity portfolio exposure is futures contracts of DKK 47m.
| Contents – Management’s review
265
3,602
484
412
837
712
6,312
2,374
2,052
279
5,188
0
410
910
1,085
7,872
2,470
2,099
10,738
12,441
23
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Capital and
risk management
The main purpose of insurance is the spread-
insurance. Operating within these boundaries,
ing of risk. By pooling risks from large numbers
Tryg’s risk will depend on the company’s choice of
of customers, an insurance company’s risks are
exposure within different segments and industries
spread more evenly, and its results should become
in the insurance market. The impact from large
more predictable. The assessment and manage-
claims and adverse weather events is mitigated
ment of Tryg’s aggregated risk and the associated
through reinsurance.
capital requirements therefore constitute a central
element in the management of the company.
The investment risk appetite is managed by means
of exposure and capital consumption limits for
Risk profile, appetite and management
different asset classes (shares, property etc.)
Tryg’s Supervisory Board defines the framework
combined with management of the total interest
for the company’s target risk appetite and thereby
risk via Tryg’s match strategy. This prescribes that
the capital which must be available to cover any
Tryg’s investment assets corresponding to the
losses. The risk appetite is set out in Tryg’s policies
technical provisions must be invested in interest-
in the form of a qualitative risk strategy and quanti-
bearing assets, the interest rate sensitivity of which
tative exposure limits for different types of risk.
matches and thereby hedges the interest rate
sensitivity of the discounted provisions as closely
The insurance risk is managed through limits for
as possible.
the size of single large commitments and via the
use of reinsurance, thus curtailing the maximum
The Solvency II regime emphasises the need for
cost of large claims. Furthermore, the insurance
sound risk management and introduces additional
risk is managed through geographical limita-
requirements concerning risk governance, consist-
tions and by refraining from offering certain types
ency across the Group and top management
of insurance such as aviation and marine hull
reporting and involvement.
Night Ravens celebrated
25th anniversary
CEO Morten Hübbe attended the Night
Ravens’ 25th anniversary in March 2015
and donated NOK 1m to the project, which
creates peace of mind for young people in
the streets at night and prevents violence
and vandalism.
Read more about the
Night Ravens on page 35.
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
24
Tryg has worked towards the principles of Solv-
Requirement/Solvency capital requirement going
from these new elements will result in a relative
need to accommodate the initiatives set out in
ency II for years and has, among other things,
forward) with a certainty of 99.5%, such that Tryg
large increase in the capital buffer, but at the same
the company’s strategy for the coming years, and
carried out risk identification routines, written
would statistically be able to honour its obligations
time the core equity will constitute a smaller part
also on the most significant risks identified by the
ORSA (Own Risk and Solvency Assessment) reports,
in 199 out of 200 years.
of the capital base.
Read more about Tryg’s
company. The adequacy is measured in relation to
acted in a set-up comprising three lines of defence
capitalisation after the introduction of Solvency II
Tryg’s strategic targets, including return on equity,
and appointed a special Risk Committee under the
At the end of 2015, the Individual Solvency
in the newsletter at tryg.com.
capital buffer and dividend policy.
Supervisory Board which focuses on capital and
Requirement totalled DKK 6,193m (DKK 6,560m
risk management.
Read more about Tryg’s risk
in 2014). For 2015, this is measured against the
Tryg’s capital base consists of equity and sub-
At the annual general meeting to be held on
management in Note 1 on page 46.
adequate capital base. At the end of 2015, this
ordinate loan capital. The relative sizes of these
16 March 2016, Tryg’s Supervisory Board will
totalled DKK 9,525m after dividend, correspond-
two categories are subject to ongoing assessment
propose a dividend per share of DKK 3.5, corre-
Capital requirement and management
ing to a surplus cover of DKK 3,332m or 54%.
with a view to maintaining an optimum structure
sponding to the distribution of DKK 1,013m.
Capital management is based on Tryg’s internal
which takes account of target return on equity,
In 2015, Tryg paid out its first semi-annual dividend
capital model, which was approved by the super-
The introduction of Solvency II will have a major
capital costs and maintaining the desired finan -
of DKK 2.5 per share. Thus, the aggregated annual
visory authorities in November 2015 for use
influence on Tryg’s capital position in various areas
cial flexibility. In connection with this assess-
dividend pay-out for 2015 will be DKK 6.00 per share,
going forward as Solvency II came into force as
and is taken into account as of 1 January 2016.
ment, Tryg’s subordinate loan of EUR 150m was
equivalent to the total distribution of DKK 1,759m.
of 1 Janu ary 2016. The capital model is based
The Solvency capital requirement will decrease by
refinanced with a new subordinated loan of
on the risk profile, and thus takes account of
approximately DKK 1,200m due to the inclusion
NOK 1,400m. By structuring the terms of the sub-
In conjunction with the capital plan, a contingency
the composition of Tryg’s insurance portfolio,
of the loss absorbency capacity of deferred tax.
ordinated loan in accordance with the Solvency II
plan is made. It describes specific measures that
geographical spread, provisions profile, reinsur-
The capital base will increase by approximately
principles, Tryg has ensured that the loan will be
may be introduced in the near term, should the
ance programme, investment portfolio and Tryg’s
DKK 400m due to the inclusion of expected future
eligible as a Tier II capital element. The NOK 800m
company’s desired capital position be threatened.
profitability in general. The model calculates the
profits (DKK 600m) and the transition to a new
subordinate loan which was issued in 2013 will be
Tryg’s Supervisory Board has approved both the
statutory capital requirement (Individual Solvency
discounting curve (DKK -200m). The net effect
grandfathered according to Solvency II and treated
capital plan and the contingency plan.
Read
Shareholder remuneration since IPO
Capital
DKK
10
8
6
4
2
0
6.6
4.2
4.2
3.4
2.6
3.1
1.3
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
New dividend policy
3.5
3.4
5.8
6.0
3.2
2.6
5.2
5.4
0.8
2010
1.3
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
DKKm
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
as Tier 1. At the end of 2015, Tryg’s total subordi-
more about Tryg’s risk management and Solvency II
nate loan capital amounted to 17% of equity, with
in Note 1 on page 46.
total interest expenses of DKK 86m.
Read more
about Tryg’s subordinated loans in Note 1 on page 46.
Standard & Poor’s
The Supervisory Board regularly assesses the
agency Standard & Poor’s was confirmed, and
need for capital adjustments. In practice, extra-
Tryg aims to maintain this rating.
In 2015, Tryg’s ‘A-’ rating from the credit rating
ordinary adjustments are made through share
buy backs assessed in the company’s capital
3,332
6,193
1,719
7,806
Individual Solvency a)
Standard Solvency Need a)
plan, in which the Individual Solvency Require-
Cash dividend
Ordinary buy back
Extraordinary buy back
Capital requirement
Buffer
Excess capital
ment is projected on the basis of Tryg’s fore-
casts. The projections are based partly on the
a) Share buy back deducted.
| Contents – Management’s review
25
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Shareholder information
dividend shares like Tryg. During the period from
Share capital and ownership
1 January to 14 April, the Tryg share rose by some
Tryg had a total share capital of DKK 1,447,798 on
30% (Tryg share was up 58% between 1 Septem-
31 December 2015. This comprised one share class
ber 2014 and 14 April 2015), while the share fell
(289,559,550 shares with a nominal value of DKK 5),
almost by the same amount in the two months
and all shares rank pari passu. The majority share-
from mid-April to mid-June due to the distribution
holder, TryghedsGruppen smba, Denmark, owns 60%
of dividend and because the Q1 figures were bur-
of the shares and is the only shareholder owning more
dened by relatively high winter claims in Norway. A
than 5% of the share capital. TryghedsGruppen invests
similar trend was seen for the European insurance
in peace-of-mind and healthcare providers in the Nor-
Investor Relations (IR) is responsible for Tryg’s com-
exchange. In accordance with the recommenda-
sector as a whole, which was up 23% between
dic region, and supports non-profit-making activities.
munication with the capital markets. It is important
tions issued by NASDAQ Copenhagen, Tryg does
1 January and 14 April 2015, and 30% between
that investors, analysts and other stakeholders are
not comment on the company’s financial results
1 September 2014 and 14 April 2015. The OMX
able to form a true and fair view of developments,
or outlook two weeks before the publication of
C20 CAP index rose by 36.2% in 2015.
including Tryg’s financial results. For this reason, we
interim reports and four weeks before the publica-
strive to be as open and transparent as possible to
tion of the annual report. Company announce-
NASDAQ Copenhagen is still the primary exchange
ensure that stakeholders’ information requirements
ments, press releases and transaction statements
for trading the Tryg share. In 2015, NASDAQ
are met at the highest possible level. IR is in charge of
are published in both Danish and English, whereas
Copenhagen accounted for 50% of the turnover of
communications with equity investors, fixed-income
interims and annual report are published in
the Tryg share. In addition, 15% of trading in 2015
investors and also rating agencies.
Tryg’s IR policy
English. All financial information is published at
was carried out on alternative exchanges (MTF
is available at tryg.com/investor.
tryg.com in English. It is possible to subscribe to
trades), led by BATS Chi-X as the largest alterna-
the interim and annual reports and all financial
tive exchange. This means that NASDAQ and the
After the publication of quarterly and annual reports,
information.
It is also possible to follow @TrygIR
alternative exchanges account for two thirds of
Tryg’s management and IR team hold meetings to
on Twitter.
discuss the company’s financial development with
the trading that impacts the liquidity of the share,
thereby determining the price of the Tryg share.
investors and analysts. Tryg also participates in a
The Tryg share started the year at a price of 137.8
Other trading platforms such as OTC (over-the-
number of financial conferences. In 2015, we held
and ended 2015 at 137.4. Including a combined
counter) and dark pools account for a large share
TrygFonden
TrygFonden works actively to create peace of
mind in Denmark, supporting around 800 ac-
tivities that contribute to this, such as coastal
lifeguards to prevent drowning accidents
on Danish beaches. Behind TrygFonden is
TryghedsGruppen, which owns 60% of the
shares in Tryg and contributes approximately
DKK 500m every year to projects that create
peace of mind throughout Denmark.
investor meetings in Europe, the USA, Canada and
(annual and semi-annual) dividend of DKK 8.3,
of the remaining trading of the share, but as this
TryghedsGruppen
Asia. The Tryg share is followed by 21 analysts, who
the share was up 5.7% during 2015, and including
takes place outside of the established exchanges
continuously update their expectations and views on
the effect of buy back, the share price increased
and MTFs, it does not directly impact the price
the share.
See a list of analysts and their recom-
by 8.3%. Especially during the first four months
and liquidity of the share. In 2015, a share buy
mendations at tryg.com/investor.
of 2015, the share price development was heavily
back programme totalling DKK1bn, correspond-
The Tryg share
ments, and the ECB announcement in September
positive impact on turnover of the Tryg share. Total
The Tryg share is listed on NASDAQ Copenhagen
2014 of an asset-backed securities programme
turnover (including OTC trades) of the share was
impacted by European macroeconomic develop-
ing to 7 million shares, was completed. This had a
and is included in the C20 index (OMX C20 CAP),
to fight deflation pushed share prices higher and
280 million shares in 2015.
comprising the 20 most traded shares on the
generally led to an increased demand for high-
Tryg’s majority shareholder, Trygheds-
Gruppen, has decided to pay out some of
its profit to members, policyholders of Tryg
Forsikring A/S in Denmark, from 2016.
The members' bonus scheme will equate to
around 5-8% of the annual price customers
pay for their insurance products.
| Contents – Management’s review
26
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | At Tryg’s annual general meeting on 25 March
semi-annual dividend from H2 2015. The object
2015, a share split was approved, involving the
of Tryg’s dividend policy is to ensure a stable dis-
splitting of each share of DKK 25 into five shares of
tribution on a full-year basis. The dividend policy
DKK 5. The reason for this was the positive devel-
reflects our expectations of high earnings in the
opment seen in the Tryg share, taking the price up
insurance business and a low risk profile for our
to more than DKK 600 and making it the second-
investment activities, as well as the requirement
most expensive share in the C20 index. In addition,
of a solid capital position based on Tryg’s internal
the share split was intended to help increase the
capital model (Individual Solvency). Tryg’s internal
liquidity of the share. At the end of 2015, there was
capital model, which constitutes the framework
a free float of 40% of the shares, held by approxi-
for calculating the company’s capital requirement,
mately 36,000 registered shareholders. The 200
is calibrated on the Solvency II rules, which came
Distribution
DKKm
Dividend
Dividend per share (DKK)
Payout ratio
Extraordinary share buy back b)
2015a)
2014
1,759
6.0
89%
1,000
1,731
5.8
68%
1,000
2013
1,656
5.4
70%
1,000
2012
1,594
5.2
72%
800
2011
400
1.3
35%
0
a) Dividend per share includes dividend for H1 of DKK 2.50 paid out in July 2015 and dividend of DKK 3.50 proposed
by the Supervisory Board for adoption by the annual general meeting.
b) Subject to approval by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authorities.
largest shareholders owned 67% of the shares.
into effect on 1 January 2016.
•
The capital level must at all times reflect
The notice will be advertised in the daily press in
the return on equity targets and the statutory
February 2016 and will be sent to shareholders
At the end of 2015, and after the share buy back
Tryg’s dividend policy is based on the following
capital requirements.
upon request.
The annual general meeting
programme, Tryg held 7,243,126 own shares, corre-
assumptions:
•
The capital level may extraordinarily be
will also be announced at tryg.com.
sponding to 2.4% of the share capital. At the coming
•
A general objective of creating long-term
adjusted through a share buy back.
annual general meeting, the Supervisory Board will
value for the company’s shareholders.
The company announcements issued in 2015
propose the cancellation of the repurchased shares.
•
A competitive dividend policy in comparison
Based on Tryg’s dividend policy and the satisfac-
can be seen at tryg.com > Investor > News.
with the policies of our Nordic competitors.
tory 2015 results, at the 2016 annual general
Semi-annual dividend from 2015
•
An aspiration to distribute a dividend which
meeting the Supervisory Board will propose
In connection with Tryg’s Capital Markets Day
is steadily increasing in nominal terms on a
that a dividend of DKK 3.50 be paid per share,
in November 2014, it was announced that
full-year basis.
corresponding to DKK 1,013m.
the Supervisory Board had decided to pay out
•
Distribution of 60-90% of the profit after tax.
The full-year dividend corresponds to a payout
of 89% of the profit after tax. Furthermore, it has
Financial calendar 2016
16 March 2016
Annual general meeting
17 March 2016
Tryg shares trade ex-dividend
Shareholders
At 31 December 2015
Free float – geographical distribution
At 31 December 2015
16
12
11
Per cent
60
TryghedsGruppen
Large Danish
shareholders a)
Large international
shareholders a)
Small shareholders
12
Per cent
59
3
12
14
Denmark
UK
USA
Nordic region
Others
a) Shareholders holding more than 10,000 shares.
Free float is exclusive of TryghedsGruppen.
been decided to initiate an extraordinary share buy
21 March 2016
Payment of dividend based on
back of DKK 1bn awaiting approval by the Danish
Financial Supervisory Authority. This decision was
made against the background of Tryg’s solid capital
position and expected earnings.
H2 2015 results
12 April 2016
Interim report for Q1 2016
12 July 2016
Half-year report 2016
13 July 2016
Tryg shares trade ex-dividend
Annual general meeting
15 July 2016
Payment of dividend based on
Tryg’s annual general meeting will be held on
16 March 2016 at 14:00 at Falkoner Centret,
Falkoner Allé 9, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
H1 2016 results
11 October 2016
Interim report for Q1-Q3 2016
| Contents – Management’s review
27
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Corporate governance
See the IR policy at tryg.com > Investor >
shareholders and that it complies with the require-
IR contacts > IR policy,
and the CSR policy
ments applicable to Tryg as a financial undertaking.
at tryg.com > CSR > CSR strategy > CSR policy.
Tryg has adopted a capital plan and a contingency
capital plan, which are reviewed annually by the
Annual general meeting
Supervisory Board.
Tryg holds an annual general meeting every year.
As required by the Danish Companies Act and the
Depending on the development in results, each
Articles of Association, the annual general meeting
year the Supervisory Board proposes a dividend
is convened via a company announcement and at
and possibly an extraordinary share buy back, if fur-
Tryg focuses on managing the company in ac-
Tryg has adopted an IR policy, which states, among
tryg.com subject to at least three weeks’ notice.
ther adjustment of the capital structure is required.
cordance with the principles of good corporate
other things, that all company announcements are
Shareholders may also opt to receive the notice by
From H2 2015, Tryg introduced a semi-annual
governance and generally complies with the Danish
published in Danish and English. Tryg publishes
post or email. The notice contains information about
dividend. At the annual general meeting in 2015,
recommendations prepared by the Committee on
interim reports each quarter, and reports are pub-
time and venue as well as an agenda for the meeting.
the shareholders authorised the Supervisory Board
Corporate Governance and most recently updated
lished in English. Furthermore, Tryg publishes an an-
to allow Tryg to acquire own shares amounting to
in 2014. The Recommendations on Corporate Gov-
nual profile in Danish, English and Norwegian. The
All shareholders are encouraged to attend the an-
up to 10% of the share capital during the period
ernance are available at corporate governance.dk.
profile is addressed to Tryg’s private shareholders,
nual general meeting. The annual general meeting
up until 25 March 2020. On 2 January 2015, Tryg
At tryg.com, Tryg has published its statutory corpo-
customers, employees and other stakeholders. The
is held by personal attendance as the Supervisory
initiated a share buy back programme, which ran
rate governance report based on the ‘comply-or-
purpose is to give a broad picture of what it is like
Board values personal contact with the Group’s
until 18 December 2015. Tryg acquired own shares
explain’ principle for each individual recommenda-
being a customer, an employee and a shareholder in
shareholders. Shareholders may propose items to be
for an amount of DKK 1bn. Once approved by the
tion. This section on corporate governance is an
Tryg. The annual profile is published on 28 January
included on the agenda for the annual general meet-
Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, Tryg will
excerpt of the corporate governance report.
2016. Moreover, Tryg prepares quarterly investor
ing, and may ask questions before and at the meet-
initiate a new share buy back programme totalling
Download Tryg’s statutory corporate govern-
presentations, which are used in the dialogue with
ing. Shareholders may vote in person at the annual
DKK 1bn, which will run until the end of 2016.
ance report at tryg.com > Investor > Download.
investors and analysts. All announcements, financial
general meeting, by post or appoint the Supervisory
reports, presentations and newsletters are available
Board or a third party as their proxy. Shareholders
Duties, responsibilities and composition
Dialogue between Tryg, shareholders
at tryg.com. This material provides all stakeholders
may consider each item on the agenda. The proxy
of the Supervisory Board
and other stakeholders
with a comprehensive picture of Tryg’s position and
form and form for voting by post are available at
The Supervisory Board is responsible for the central
The Investor Relations (IR) department main-
performance. The consolidated financial reports
tryg.com prior to the annual general meeting.
strategic management and financial control of Tryg
tains regular contact with analysts and investors.
are presented in accordance with IFRS. At tryg.com,
and for ensuring that the business is organised
Together with the Executive Board, IR organises
stakeholders are able to subscribe to press releases,
Share and capital structure
in a sound way. This is achieved by monitoring
investor meetings and conference calls and partici-
company announcements as well as insider trading
Tryg’s share capital comprises a single share class,
targets and frameworks on the basis of regular and
pates in conferences in Denmark and abroad. IR
announcements. A number of internal guide-
and all shares rank pari passu. The majority share-
systematic reviews of the strategy and risks. The
also communicates with stakeholders in the social
lines ensure that the disclosure of price-sensitive
holder, TryghedsGruppen smba, owns 60% of the
Executive Board reports to the Supervisory Board
media via Twitter@TrygIR. The Supervisory Board
information complies with legislation and the stock
shares and is the only shareholder owning more
on strategies and action plans, market develop-
is informed about the dialogue with investors and
exchange’s codes of conduct. Tryg has adopted
than 5% of the company’s shares. The Supervisory
ments and Group performance, funding issues,
other stakeholders on a regular basis.
a number of policies describing the relationship
Board ensures that Tryg’s capital structure is aligned
capital resources and special risks. The Supervisory
between different stakeholders.
with the needs of the Group and the interests of its
Board holds one annual strategy seminar to decide
| Contents – Management’s review
28
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | on and/or adjust the Group’s strategy with a view
The Supervisory Board performs an annual evalu -
Each year, the Supervisory Board discusses Tryg’s
The board committees’ terms of reference can
to sustaining value creation in the company. The
ation of its work and skills to ensure that it pos-
activities to guarantee diversity at management
be found at tryg.com > Governance > Management
Executive Board works with the Supervisory Board
sesses the expertise required to perform its duties
levels. Tryg attaches importance to diversity at all
> Super visory Board > Board committees, including
to ensure that the Group’s strategy is developed and
in the best possible way. The Supervisory Board
management levels. Tryg has prepared an action plan,
descrip tions of members, meeting frequency,
monitored. The Supervisory Board ensures that the
focuses primarily on the following qualifications and
which sets out specific targets to ensure diversity and
responsibil ities and activities during the year.
necessary skills and financial resources are available
skills: management experience, financial insight,
equal opportunities and access to management pos-
See the tasks of the board committees in 2015
for Tryg to achieve its strategic targets. The Super-
organisation, IT, product development, commu-
itions for qualified men and women. In 2015, the pro-
at tryg.com > Governance > Management > Super-
visory Board specifies its activities in a set of rules of
nication, market insight, international experience,
portion of women at management level was 35.4%
visory Board > Board committees.
procedure and an annual cycle for its work.
knowledge of insurance, reinsurance, capital
against 36.4% in 2014. The target for 2015 of 38% or
requirements, general accounting insight and ac-
more women at management level was therefore not
Three out of four members of the Audit Committee
Eight members of the Supervisory Board are elect-
counting principles (GAAP), including regulations
met. Tryg maintains the target to increase the total
and three out of five members of the Risk Committee,
ed by the annual general meeting for a term of one
and principles designed for the insurance industry
proportion of women at management level to 38% or
including the chairman of the committees, are
year. Of the eight members elected at the annual
and M&A experience.
See CVs and descriptions
more in 2016.
See the action plan at tryg.com >
independent persons. Of the four members of the
general meeting, four are independent persons as
of the skills in the section Super visory Board on
CSR > Thematic areas > People.
Remuneration Committee, one member is an inde-
stated in recommendation 3.2.1 in Recommenda-
pages 32-33
and at tryg.com > Governance >
tions on Corporate Governance, while the other
Management > Supervisory Board.
Board committees
pendent person, while one out of two members of
the Nomination Committee is independent. Board
four members are dependent persons as they are
Tryg has an Audit, a Risk, a Nomination and a Remu-
committee members are elected primarily based
appointed by the majority shareholder Trygheds-
Duties and composition of the Executive Board
neration Committee. The framework of the commit-
on special skills that are considered important
Gruppen. See pages 32-33 for information on when
Each year, the Supervisory Board reviews and
tees’ work is defined in their terms of reference.
by the Supervisory Board. Involvement of the
the individual members joined the Supervisory
adopts the rules of procedure of the Supervisory
Board, were re-elected and when their current elec-
Board and the Executive Board with relevant
tion period ends. To ensure the integration of new
policies, guidelines and instructions describing
talent on the Supervisory Board, members elected
reporting requirements and requirements for com-
by the annual general meeting may hold office for a
munication with the Executive Board. Financial
DKK
Total remuneration of the Supervisory Board in 2015
Audit
Fee Committee Committee
Risk Remuneration
Committee
Total
maximum of nine years. Furthermore, members of
legislation also requires the Executive Board to
the Supervisory Board must retire at the first annual
disclose all relevant information to the Super -
general meeting following their 70th birthday. The
visory Board and report on compliance with limits
Supervisory Board has 12 members, five men and
defined by the Supervisory Board and in legislation.
seven women (including one male and three female
employee representatives). Women are thus not
The Supervisory Board considers the compos-
underrepresented on Tryg’s Supervisory Board. The
ition, development, risk and succession plans of
Supervisory Board has members from Denmark,
the Executive Board in connection with the annual
Sweden and Norway.
See details about the
evaluation of the Executive Board, and regularly in
independent board members in the section Super-
connection with board meetings.
visory Board on pages 32-33
and at tryg.com
> Governance > Management > Supervisory Board.
Jørgen Huno Rasmussen
Torben Nielsen
Anya Eskildsen
Vigdis Fossehagen
Ida Sofie Jensen
Bill-Owe Johansson
Lone Hansen
Jesper Hjulmand
Lene Skole
Tina Snejbjerg
Mari Thjømøe
Carl Viggo Östlund a)
Paul Bergqvist b)
990,000
660,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
258,145
71,855
225,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
90,000
90,000
135,000 1,125,000
1,035,000
420,000
420,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
580,000
580,000
430,000
580,000
327,097
92,903
68,952
21,048
a) Joined the Supervisory Board in March 2015 b) Resigned from the Supervisory Board in March 2015
| Contents – Management’s review
29
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Total remuneration of the Executive Management in 2015
provide sufficient motivation for all members of
security. The Supervisory Board issues guidelines
the Executive Board to do their best to achieve the
to the Executive Board. Risks associated with new
DKK
Basic salary
Car/
Pension car allowance
Total fixed
salary
Value of
matching
shares a)
Total
fee
company’s defined targets. The variable pay ele-
financial reporting rules and accounting policies are
ment constitutes only a limited part of the overall
monitored and considered by the Audit Committee,
Morten Hübbe
Tor Magne Lønnum
Lars Bonde
9,419,270
2,354,817
6,026,452b) 1,342,553
1,134,691
4,538,766
255,000 12,029,087
7,523,569
154,564
5,928,457
255,000
1,100,000 13,129,087
8,173,569
6,428,457
650,000
500,000
a) At time of allocation b) Tor Lønnum’s basic salery includes a non-pensionable relocation allowance of DKK 656,239.
remuneration. The Supervisory Board can decide
the finance management and the internal auditors.
that the fixed pay be supplemented with a variable
Material legal and tax-related issues and the
pay element of up to 12.5% of the fixed basic
financial reporting of such issues are assessed on
pay including pension at the time of allocation.
an ongoing basis.
Other risks associated with
The variable pay element consists of a matching
the financial reporting are described in the section
shares programme. Four years after the purchase
Capital and risk management on pages 24-25
employee representatives in the committees is also
fixed fee and are not comprised by any form of
by a member of the Executive Board of a speci-
and in Note 1 Risk management on page 46.
considered important. The committees ex clusively
incentive or severance programme or pension
fied number of shares, such member is granted
prepare matters for decision by the entire Super-
scheme. Their remuneration is based on trends in
a corresponding number of free shares in Tryg.
Tryg engages in ongoing risk identification, map-
visory Board.
The special skills of all members
peer companies, taking into account the required
The purpose of the matching shares programme
ping insurance risks and other risks which may
are also described at tryg.com.
skills, efforts and the scope of the Supervisory
is both to retain members of the Executive Board,
endanger the realisation of the Group’s strategy or
Board’s work, including the number of meetings
and to create a joint financial interest between the
which may have a potentially substantial impact on
Remuneration of Management
held. The remuneration received by the Chairman
Executive Board and the shareholders.
Read
the Group’s financial position. The process involves
Tryg has adopted a remuneration policy for the
of the Board is triple that received by ordinary
more about the matching shares programme in
identifying and continually monitoring the risks
Supervisory Board and the Executive Board,
members, while the Deputy Chairman’s remuner-
the remuner ation policy at tryg.com > Governance
identified. As in previous years, Tryg undertook
including general guidelines for incentive pay. The
ation is double that received by ordinary members
> Remuneration.
remuneration policy for 2015 was adopted by
of the Supervisory Board.
an Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) in
2015. The purpose of the ORSA is to link strategy,
the Supervisory Board in December 2014 and by
Each member of the Executive Board is entitled
risk management and appetite and solvency, as the
the annual general meeting on 25 March 2015.
Remuneration of Executive Board
to 12 months’ notice of termination and 12
aim of the ORSA is to ensure a sensible correlation
Members of the Executive Board are employed on
months’ severance pay. However, the Group CEO
between the strategy for assuming risks and the
The Chairman of the Supervisory Board reports
a contractual basis, and all terms of their remu-
is entitled to 12 months’ notice of termination and
available capital over the business planning period.
on Tryg’s remuneration policy each year in connec-
neration are established by the Supervisory Board
18 months’ severance pay. Each member of the
tion with the consideration of the annual report at
within the framework of the approved remuner-
Executive Board has 25% of the basic salary paid
The Supervisory Board and the Executive Board
the annual general meeting. The Board’s proposal
ation policy. Tryg wants to ensure an appropriate
into a pension scheme.
approve and monitor the Group’s overall policies
for the remuneration of the Supervisory Board
and balanced combination between management
and guidelines, procedures and controls in
for the current financial year is also submitted for
remuneration, predictable risk and value creation
Financial reporting, risk management and auditing
important risk areas. They receive reports about
approval by the shareholders at the annual general
for the shareholders in the short and long term.
Being an insurance business, Tryg is subject to
developments in these areas and about the
meeting.
See the remuneration policy at
the risk management requirements of the Danish
ways in which the frameworks are applied. The
tryg.com > Governance > Remuneration.
The Executive Board’s remuneration consists
Financial Business Act and Solvency II. In its
Supervisory Board checks that the company’s risk
of a fixed pay element, a pension and a variable
policies, the Supervisory Board defines Tryg’s risk
management and internal controls are effective.
Remuneration of Supervisory Board
pay element. The fixed pay element must be
management framework as regards insurance risk,
The Board receives reports on non-compliance
Members of Tryg’s Supervisory Board receive a
competitive and appropriate for the market and
investment risk and operational risk, as well as IT
with the frameworks and guidelines established by
| Contents – Management’s review
30
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Tryg has published its statutory corporate
governance report based on the ‘comply-
or-explain’ principle for each individual
recommendation.
Download the
report at tryg.com > Investor > Download.
the Supervisory Board. The Risk Committee moni-
Read more about Tryg’s whistleblower line at
tors the risk management on an ongoing basis and
tryg.com > Governance > Whistleblower line
reports quarterly to the Supervisory Board.
Independent and internal audit
The Group’s internal control systems are based on
The Supervisory Board ensures monitoring by
clear organisational structures and guidelines, gen-
competent and independent auditors. The Group’s
eral IT controls and segregation of functions, which
internal auditor attends all Board meetings. The
are supervised by the internal auditors.
independent auditor attends the annual Board
meeting at which the annual report is presented.
As part of the internal control system, Tryg has
established independent risk management, compli-
The annual general meeting annually appoints
ance and actuarial functions. The functions report
an independent auditor recommended by the
to the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board’s
Super visory Board. The internal and independent
Risk Committee. Tryg has a decentralised set-up
auditors attend the Audit Committee meetings and
whereby risk managers in the business areas carry
at least once a year, the auditors meet with the Audit
out controlling tasks for the risk management envir-
Committee without the presence of the Executive
onment and Tryg’s compliance function.
Board. The Chairman of the Audit Committee deals
with any matters that need to be reported to the
The Executive Board has established a formal
Supervisory Board.
process for the Group comprising monthly reporting,
including for example budget and deviation reports.
Tryg’s internal audit department regularly reviews
the quality of the Group’s internal control systems
Risk management is an integral part of Tryg’s busi-
and business procedures. It is responsible for
ness operations. The Group seeks at all times to
planning, performing and reporting the audit work
minimise the risk of unnecessary losses in order
to the Supervisory Board.
to optimise returns on the company’s capital.
Read more about Tryg’s risk management in
Deviations and explanations
the section Capital and risk management on pages
Tryg complies with the Recommendations on
24-25
and in Note 1 on page 46.
Corporate Governance with the exception of
Whistleblower line
the recommendation concerning the number of
independent members of the board committees,
Tryg has a whistleblower line, which allows em-
with which Tryg complies partially; see item 3.4.2 of
ployees, customers and business partners to report
the Recom mendations on Corporate Governance.
any serious wrongdoing or suspected irregularities.
The deviation is explained in Tryg’s statutory
Reporting takes place in confidence to the Chairman
corporate governance report, which is available
of the Audit Committee and the Head of Compliance.
at tryg.com > Investor > Download.
| Contents – Management’s review
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
31
Supervisory Board
Jørgen
Huno Rasmussen a)
Chairman
Born in 1952. Joined: 2012.
Danish citizen. Professional
board member. Adjunct
Pro fessor, CBS. Former CEO
of the FLSmidth Group.
Education: Graduate Diploma
in Organisation, MSc (Civ. Eng.)
and PhD.
Chairman: Tryg A/S, Tryg For-
sik ring A/S, TryghedsGruppen
smba, Lundbeckfonden and
LundbeckFond Invest A/S.
Deputy Chairman: Terma A/S,
Rambøll Group A/S and Haldor
Topsøe A/S.
Board member: Bladt Industries
A/S, Otto Mønsted A/S and
Thomas B. Thriges Fond.
Committee memberships:
Chairman of Remuneration
Committee, Nomination Commit-
tee and the Remuneration Com-
mittee in Haldor Topsøe A/S.
Number of shares held:1,830
Change in portfolio 2015: 0
As former CEO of FLSmidth,
Jørgen Huno Rasmussen has
experience in international
management of listed com-
panies and special skills within
strategy, business development,
communication, risk manage-
ment and finance.
Torben Nielsen b)
Anya Eskildsen a)
Vigdis Fossehagen
Lone Hansen
Bill-Owe Johansson
Born 1968. Joined: 2013.
Danish citizen. CEO at Niels
Brock Copenhagen Business
College
Education: MSc in political
Science, business college
teaching degree, certified IoD
Board Programme.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S, Trygheds-
Gruppen smba, California
International Business University
(CIBU), USA and Learn for Life
(Egmont Fonden).
Committee memberships:
Remuneration Committee,
member of Nykredits Regions-
råd, Danish Chinese Business
Forum, GSK coordinator
apointed by minister and NOCA.
Number of shares held: 250
Change in portfolio 2015: +250
Anya Eskildsen has experience
within financial management,
strategic management, commu-
nication and marketing, innova-
tion and ideas generation and
international system exports.
Deputy Chairman
Born in 1947. Joined: 2011.
Danish citizen. Professional
board member, Adjunct Pro-
fessor, CBS. Former Governor of
Danmarks Nationalbank
(Danish Central Bank).
Education: Savings bank training,
Graduate Diplomas in Organisa-
tion, Work Sociology, Credit and
Financing.
Chairman: Sydbank A/S, Investe-
ringsforeningen Sparinvest, Inve-
steringsforeningen Sparinvest
Sicav, Luxembourg, EIK banki p/f,
Capital Market Partners and
Museum South East Denmark.
Deputy Chairman: Tryg A/S
and Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Board member: Sampension KP
Livsforsikring A/S, Dansk Land-
brugs Realkredit and a member
of the Executive Management
of Bombebøssen.
Committee memberships:
Audit Committee (Chairman),
Risk Committee (Chairman) and
Remuneration Committee.
Number of shares held: 19,000
Change in portfolio 2015: +1,500
Torben Nielsen has special skills
in the fields of management,
finance, financial services and risk
management as former Governor
of Danmarks Nationalbank.
Employee representative
Born in 1955. Joined: 2012.
Norwegian citizen. Employed
since 1996.
Education: Educated in the area
of agricultural mechanics.
Chairman: Finansforbundet
Tryg, Norway.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Committee memberships:
Remuneration Committee and
lay judge in the District Court
of Bergen.
Number of shares held: 265
Change in portfolio 2015: +165
Employee representative
Born in 1966. Joined: 2012.
Danish citizen. Employed
since 1990.
Education: Certified commer-
cial insurance agent. Various
insurance and sales courses
and negotiation training.
Chairman: The Association for
Tied Agents and Key Account
Managers in Tryg.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Member of the Tied Agents’
District Board of the Financial
Services Union Denmark.
Number of shares held: 695
Change in portfolio 2015: +165
Employee representative
Born in 1959. Joined: 2010.
Swedish citizen. Claims handler
in Moderna (Swedish branch).
Employed since 2002.
Education: Insurance training.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Number of shares held: 1,265
Change in portfolio 2015: +165
Members of the Supervisory Board are elected for a term of one year.
Employee representatives are, however, elected for a term of four years.
The next election of employee representatives will be held in 2016.
a) Dependent member of the Supervisory Board.
b) Independent member of the Supervisory Board, as per the definition in
Recommendations on Corporate Governance.
| Contents – Management’s review
32
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Supervisory Board
Jesper Hjulmand a)
Lene Skole b)
Mari Thjømøe b)
Carl-Viggo Östlund b)
Ida Sofie Jensen a)
Tina Snejbjerg
Born in 1963. Joined: 2010.
Danish citizen. CEO of SEAS-
NVE A.m.b.A.
Education: MSc in Economics
and Business Administration,
Lieutenant-Colonel Royal in
the Danish Air Force Reserve,
pathfinder.
Chairman: Association of Danish
Energy and Distribution Compan-
ies (DEA), Energi Danmark A/S,
Fibia P/S, and SEAS-NVE Net A/S.
Deputy Chairman: Trygheds-
Gruppen smba.
Board member: Tryg A/S,
Tryg Forsikring A/S, DI General
Council and Dansk Energi.
Committee memberships: Audit
Committee and Risk Committee,
Executive Director Committee
of Dansk Energi (Chairman),
Green Committee in Region
Zeland (Chairman) and member
of the Board of Representatives
of TryghedsGruppen.
Number of shares held: 8,750
Change in portfolio 2015: 0
From his positions with
SEAS-NVE, Jesper Hjulmand
has experience within M&A,
strategy, organisa tional and
management development,
communication and business
development.
Born in 1959. Joined: 2010.
Danish citizen. CEO of the
Lundbeck Foundation and
Lundbeckfond Invest A/S.
Education: The A.P. Møller
Group’s international shipping
education, Graduate Diploma
in Financing and various
international management
programmes.
Deputy Chairman: Dong
Energy A/S, H. Lundbeck A/S,
ALK-Abelló A/S and Falck A/S
(Falck Holding A/S, Falck
Danmark A/S).
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Committee memberships: Audit
Committee and Risk Committee,
the Audit Committee in ALK-
Abelló A/S and H. Lundbeck A/S.
Number of shares held: 5,525
Change in portfolio 2015: +1,800
Lene Skole has experience
from international companies,
among other things through
her previous work in Coloplast
and The Maersk Company Ltd.,
UK. Lene Skole has skills within
strategy, finance, financing and
communication.
Born in 1962. Joined: 2012.
Norwegian citizen. Professional
board member and independent
advisor.
Education: Master of Econom-
ics and Business Administra-
tion, Financial Analyst (CFA) and
executive programmes, London
Business School and Harvard
Business School.
Chairman: Seilsport Maritimt
Forlag AS.
Board member: Tryg A/S,
Tryg Forsikring A/S, Argentum
Fondsinvesteringer as, Nordic
Mining ASA, Forskningskonsernet
Sintef, E-CO Energi, Scatec Solar
ASA, Avinor, Sevan Marine ASA.
Committee memberships: Audit
Committee and Risk Committee
Member of Audit Committee in
Sevan Marine ASA and E-CO
(Chairman), Scatec Solar ASA
and Remuneration Committee
in Argentum.
Number of shares held: 1,800
Change in portfolio 2015: +300
Mari Thjømøe has experience
from finance, investor relations,
international management,
strategy, branding and a special
knowledge of the insurance
market and special insights into
Norwegian market conditions as
a Norwegian citizen.
Born in 1955. Joined: 2015.
Swedish citizen. Professional
board member and independent
advisor. Former CEO of the
Swedish banks SBAB and Nordnet
as well as the insurance company
SalusAnsvar.
Education: Bachelor of Science,
education in International Busi-
ness and Finance & Accounting.
Chairman: Beyond Clean Water
AB, Creador AB, Plus Bolån/
MA 2 AB, SFM Stockholm AB,
PAUSE Foundation
Board member: Tryg A/S, Tryg
Forsikring A/S, Culture Vision
and Organisation Sweden AB,
Committee memberships:
Remuneration Committee.
Number of shares held: 0
From a number of leading
positions in listed as well as
privately held companies, Carl-
Viggo Östlund has experience
from the packaging industry,
logistics, insurance, finance and
banking. As a Swedish citizen,
Carl-Viggo Östlund has special
knowledge of Swedish market
conditions.
Employee representative
Born in 1962. Joined: 2010.
Danish citizen. Employed since
1987. Head of Section in Tryg’s
staff association.
Education: Insurance training.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Committee memberships:
Audit Committee and Central
Board of DFL.
Number of shares held: 695
Change in portfolio 2015: +165
Born in 1958. Joined: 2013.
Danish citizen. Director General
of Lif (Danish Assosiation of
the Pharmaceutical Industry)
and the subsidiary DLI A/S Dansk
Lægemiddel Information A/S.
Education: MSc in Political
Science, European Health
Leadership Programme INSEAD,
Executive Management
Programme INSEAD, Executive
Programme Columbia Business
School.
Board member: Tryg A/S and
Tryg Forsikring A/S, Trygheds-
Gruppen smba, Plougmann &
Vingtoft A/S and Hans Knudsen
Instituttet (business trust).
Number of shares held: 1,175
Change in portfolio 2015: +310
Ida Sofie Jensen has experience
from business operations and
the health sector as well as
management, strategy, politics
and finance.
Members of the Supervisory Board are elected for a term of one year.
Employee representatives are, however, elected for a term of four years.
The next election of employee representatives will be held in 2016.
a) Dependent member of the Supervisory Board.
b) Independent member of the Supervisory Board, as per the definition in
Recommendations on Corporate Governance.
| Contents – Management’s review
33
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Executive Board
On 1 January 2016, Tryg changed the
daily management structure. The Nordic
business areas are transferred to national
business areas with new directors heading
the areas. The new structure replaces the
Group Executive Management, and the top
management is constituted by an Executive
Board comprising CEO, CFO and COO.
The former Group Executive Vice Presidents
either continue as directors of one of the
newly established business areas or in other
positions within the organisation. Trond Bøe
Svestad, former Group Executive Vice Presi-
dent of Commercial, left Tryg in connection
with the organisational change.
See organisational chart at tryg.com
Morten Hübbe
Group CEO
Tor Magne Lønnum
Group CFO
Lars Bonde
Group COO
Born in 1972. Joined Tryg in 2002.
Joined the Executive Board in 2003.
Born in 1967. Joined Tryg in 2011.
Joined the Executive Board in 2011.
Born in 1965. Joined Tryg in 1998.
Joined the Executive Board in 2006.
Education: BSc in International Business
Administration and Modern Languages,
MSc in Finance and Accounting and management
programme at Wharton.
Board member: Tjenestemændenes Forsikring,
KMD A/S and KMD Holding A/S.
Number of shares held: 85,740
Change in portfolio in 2015: +18,475
Education: State-authorised public accountant,
Executive Master of Business and Administration
from University of Bristol and Ecole Nationale
des Ponts et Chaussées.
Board member: Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S,
Thermopylae AS (Chairman) and Finansnæringens
Fellesorganisasjon, TGS Nopec ASA and P/f
Bakkafrost.
Number of shares held: 34,150
Change in portfolio in 2015: +4.150
Education: Insurance training, LL.M.
Board member: Danish Employers’ Association
for the Financial Sector, Tjenestemændenes
Forsikring, Forsikringsakademiet, the Danish
Insurance Association and Cphbusiness.
Number of shares held: 36,845
Change in portfolio in 2015: +9.790
| Contents – Management’s review
34
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Corporate Social Responsibility in Tryg
Statutory Corporate Social Responsibility report
SMS pilot to prevent storm claims
In 2015, we reduced our carbon emissions by 48.8%
In 2015, Tryg launched an SMS pilot which sent
compared to 2007. Thus, we did not achieve our goal
10,000 text messages to customers living in areas
of a 50% reduction. This was to be expected as an
in which cloudbursts were forecast. Customer
increased level of travel activity was necessary to en-
feedback was extremely positive with 77% rating
sure the smooth transition of tasks to our offshoring
the service 9 or 10 on a scale of 0-10. In 2016,
partners in Asia. However, emissions were reduced
we will investigate the possibility of introducing a
by 0.48% compared to 2014. Our target for 2016 is a
more permanent SMS solution.
1% reduction compared to 2015.
Read more at
tryg.com > CSR > Thematic areas > Climate.
Tryg’s ambition is to be the world’s best insurance
Principles on Business and Human Rights, and
Carbon emissions
company. Realising this ambition means operating in
Global Reporting Initiative. The Supervisory Board
Our carbon emissions are mainly associated with
People
a responsible manner and taking care of society. For
approves Tryg’s CSR policy annually.
Download
heating and electricity use at our offices, as well
At Tryg, we focus on the well-being of our employees
this purpose steps have been taken to link Corporate
the policyat tryg.com > CSR > CSR strategy > CSR
as car and air travel. We have already introduced a
and their right to a healthy and safe workplace. We
Social Responsibility (CSR) more closely to Tryg’s
policy
Read more about Tryg’s CSR KPIs at
variety of climate-friendly initiatives. These include
welcome diversity and ensure non-discrimination
core business. Thus, the ambition for 2016 is for the
tryg.com > CSR > CSR strategy > CSR KPIs.
the installation of 82 video conference rooms in
through equal treatment of all our employees
CSR department to work closer with Tryg’s Claims
order to minimise travel between offices as well as
regardless of gender, age, disabilities, ethnic origin,
Prevention department to introduce new activities
Climate
re placing traditional light bulbs with LED light. We
sexual orientation and religion. We see our different
equally beneficial to society and to our customers.
The global climate is changing, and we are seeing
also work to minimise other greenhouse gas emis-
perspectives as an asset that increases the quality of
Read more at tryg.com > CSR.
an increase in climate-related claims. In 2014-2015,
sions. In 2015, we replaced our old Freon 22-based
our services through a better understanding of our
Our efforts focus on climate, people, business ethics
weather property insurance claims compared to
tem running on ammonia. In 2016, our ambition is to
and peace of mind. We comply with all aspects of
2012-2013 (excluding storm claims). Because of
introduce even more climate-friendly solutions in
In collaboration with the Municipality of Ballerup,
an increase of 103.2% was seen in the number of
cooling system with a new and more effective sys-
customer needs.
Danish legislation, but our efforts are also based on
the more extreme weather, we want to devise
our daily operations.
the principles of the UN Global Compact, UN Guiding
solutions which prevent damage in the first place.
Employee mix
No.
1,800
1,500
1,200
900
600
300
0
Men
Women
Age
<30 yrs
Age
30-49 yrs
Age
<50 yrs
Flexi job
Ikke-
vestlig
baggrund a)
Waste
Kg
150,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
30,000
0
Paper &
corrugated
cardboard
IT, batteries
& light
sources
Bio waste
Residual
Carbon emissions
Tonnes
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
a) Non-Western background has been compiled by
Statistics Denmark.
| Contents – Management’s review
The carbon emissions chart covers both Norway and
Denmark; air travel also includes Sweden.
In Tryg, processes are in place to ensure that men
and women enjoy equal treatment in terms of pay
35
Electricity
Heating oil
Air travel
Motor
2014
2015
Equal opportunities
Tryg helps prepare refugees for entering the Danish
labour market. In 2016, we hope to be able to offer
an introductory course for refugees.
In Tryg, we attach importance to striking a healthy
work/life balance and support our employees by
offering flexible working hours and the option of
working from home. Each year, we conduct an
internal employee satisfaction survey. The result was
index 74 in 2015 compared to 71 in 2014.
Read
more at tryg.com > CSR > Thematic area > People.
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
levels and career opportunities. To comply with sec-
system, 124 automobile suppliers reported on their
have also visited our partners to get a better
local community in Ballerup to participate in two
tion 99b of the Danish Financial Statements Act on
CSR efforts in 2015.
Read more at tryg.com >
understanding of their operations and to support
workshops. One focused on bicycle safety and the
equal gender representation at management level,
CSR > Thematic area > Business ethics.
them during the first few weeks after taking over the
other one on prevention of fire. Both workshops
our initiatives include an action plan aimed at ensur-
new processes. Partners are asked to submit an
received positive feedback, and we are planning to
ing the recruitment and promotion of more women
As a part of Tryg's business ethics including anti-
annual CSR report.
Read more at tryg.com >
host at least one workshop in 2016. To increase our
in management roles. Internal recruiters as well as
corruption, we have a code of ethics which all em-
CSR > Thematic area > Business ethics.
engagement with the local community, we will also
external agencies are instructed to work actively to
ployees must know and adhere to. At the same time,
re-launch a financial training course in 2016 aimed
present qualified candidates of both genders.
our employees are obliged to report any activities
The offshoring programme has resulted in redun-
at enabling young people to assume responsibility
that do not comply with our code of ethics or ap-
dancies. Tryg has made a new-placement agree-
for their finances.
Read more at tryg.com > CSR >
In 2015, our ambitious target of 38% or more
plicable legislation. For this purpose, Tryg has set up a
ment with the stated object ive that at least 90%
Thematic areas > Peace of mind.
women at management level was not achieved
whistleblower line, where it is possible for employees
of the affected employees must have found a new
as the share of women in management positions
and external stakeholders to report such instances in
job, started studying or in some other way clarified
Night Ravens
stood at 35.4%. Not meeting our target can be
confidentiality. The whistleblower line was used once
their career path within 12 months of leaving Tryg.
In 2015, Tryg celebrated the 20th anniversary
ascribed to the fact that even though we want both
in 2015. In 2016, we will work to further increase
Preliminary results show that in Denmark 94%
collaboration with the Night Ravens in Norway. The
genders to be represented in the recruitment pro-
awareness of the code of ethics among our employees.
of those made redundant in February 2015 have
Night Ravens are volunteers who walk the streets
cess, we are at the same time interested in appoint-
Read more at tryg.com > Governance > Whistle-
found new opportunities.
at night to prevent violence and crime. To mark the
ing the person best qualified for the job, whether
blower line
Read our code of ethics at tryg.com >
a man or a woman. The result shows that we were
CSR > Thematic areas > Business ethics.
Peace of mind
anniversary, a conference was held in Bergen which
was attended by the Norwegian Prime Minister
not able to attract enough of the qualified women
In Tryg, we want to help create peace of mind in so-
Erna Solbjerg. At the conference, Tryg's CEO Morten
in 2015, an issue which we will strive to address in
Taxes
ciety. This is our reason for engaging in a number of
Hübbe donated NOK 1m to enable the Night Ravens
2016. To qualify and motivate more women to apply
Tryg’s tax policy is adopted by the Supervisory Board
activities to prevent claims. One initiative is to offer
to continue their valuable work. At the end of 2015,
for management jobs, we are maintaining our focus
once a year and anchored in the Audit Committee.
synthetic DNA marking as a way of preventing break-
there were approximately 370 active groups of Night
on the issue in 2016, and planning a number of
The tax policy includes guidelines ensuring that Tryg
ins. The initiative started in 2014 in Sønderborg,
Ravens in Norway.
Read more at tryg.com >
events targeted at high-potential women in Tryg.
pays all relevant taxes.
Denmark. In 2015, Tryg distributed 280 marking kits
CSR > Thematic areas > Peace of mind.
The target for 2016 is 38% or more women in
in Sandefjord, Norway. In October 2015, preliminary
management position.
Read more at tryg.com >
Responsible offshoring
results from Sønderborg showed a 50% decline in
Lifebuoys
CSR > Thematic area > People.
In 2015, Tryg extended its offshoring programme
the number of break-ins for the 90 properties using
The red-and-white lifebuoy has become a symbol of
to include accounting. In its choice of partners, Tryg
DNA marking compared to a 26% decline in the
safety along the coastlines in Denmark, Norway and
Business ethics
has paid much attention to working conditions,
area in general. In 2016, we will be able to conclude
Sweden. Since 1952, more than 39,000 life buoys
In Tryg, we respect human rights in everything we
wanting to ensure that our partners respect human
on the long-term preventive effect of synthetic DNA
have been installed in Norway alone, and every year
do, and we want to improve our preventive efforts
and labour rights. At the same time, a risk analysis
marking in Sønderborg.
Read more at tryg.com >
they help prevent drownings. In 2015, the demand
to minimise the risk of human rights violations. To
of each partner is performed before signing the
CSR > Thematic areas > Peace of mind.
for more lifebuoys increased as Tryg distributed over
ensure that Tryg’s values are part of our suppliers’
contract. Tryg also wants to make sure that workers
2,000 compared to around 1,000 in 2014. In 2016,
mindset, all our suppliers have to comply with
receive the necessary training, which is why our
Engagement with the local community
Tryg will continue to donate lifebuoys to enhance
our CSR reporting guidelines. Therefore, we have
partners’ employees have been visiting Tryg to learn
To create peace of mind and share our knowledge
safety at the seaside.
Read more at tryg.com >
introduced a new reporting system. Trialling the new
about our systems and processes. Tryg employees
about prevention, we invited 120 students from the
CSR > Thematic areas > Peace of mind.
| Contents – Management’s review
36
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Menu – Financial statements 2015
TRYG GROUP
4
Insurance technical interest,
17 Current tax
Note Statement by the Supervisory
net of reinsurance
Board and the Executive
5 Claims, net of reinsurance
Management
38
6
Insurance operating costs,
Independent auditor’s reports
Financial highlights
Income statement
Statement of comprehensive
income
39
40
41
42
net of reinsurance
6 Share option programme
6 Matching shares
7
Interest income and
dividends etc.
Statement of financial position 43
8 Value adjustments
Statement of changes in equity 44
9 Tax
Cash flow statement
1 Risk and capital management
2 Operating segments
2 Geographical segments
45
46
56
58
10
Profit/loss on discontinued
and divested business
11
Intangible assets
12 Property, plant and equipment
2
Technical result, net of
13
Investment property
62
62
62
64
66
67
67
67
67
68
71
72
18 Equity
19 Premium provisions
19 Claims provisions
20 Pensions and similar liabilities
21 Deferred tax
22 Other provisions
23
Amounts owed to credit
institutions
24
Debt relating to unsettled
funds transactions and repos
25 Earnings per share
26
Contractual obligations,
collateral and contingent
liabilities
27 Acquisition of subsidiaries
reinsurance, by line of business 60
14 Equity investments in associates 72
28 Related parties
3
Premium income, net of
15 Financial assets
reinsurance
62
16 Reinsurers’ share
74
76
29 Financial highlights
30 Accounting policies
76
76
77
77
78
80
80
80
80
80
81
83
83
84
85
TRYG A/S (PARENT COMPANY)
Income statement – Tryg A/S
(parent company)
94
Statement of financial position
– Tryg A/S (parent company)
95
Statement of changes in equity
(parent company)
Notes (parent company)
REPORTING FOR Q4
Quarterly outline
Geographical
segments
INFORMATION
Other key ratios
Group chart
Glossary
Product overview
Disclaimer
96
97
100
102
103
104
105
106
107
Tryg’s Group consolidated financial statements are prepared
in accordance with IFRS.
| Menu – Financial statements
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
37
Statement by the Supervisory Board and the Executive Management
The Supervisory Board and the Executive Manage-
company have been prepared in accordance with
assets, liabilities and financial position at 31
and the parent company, the results for the year
ment have today considered and adopted the
the Danish Financial Business Act. In addition, the
December 2015 and of the results of the Group’s
and of the Group’s and the parent company’s
annual report for 2015 of Tryg A/S and the Tryg
annual report has been presented in accordance
and the parent company’s operations and the cash
financial position in general and describes signifi-
Group.
with additional Danish disclosure requirements for
flows of the Group for the financial year
cant risk and uncertainty factors that may affect
the annual reports of listed financial enterprises.
1 January-31 December 2015.
the Group and the parent company.
The consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the International
In our opinion, the accounting policies applied are
Furthermore, in our opinion the Management’s
We recommend that the annual report be adopted
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
appropriate, and the annual report gives a true and
report gives a true and fair view of developments
by the shareholders at the annual general meeting.
EU, and the financial statements of the parent
fair view of the Group’s and the parent company’s
in the activities and financial position of the Group
Ballerup, 21 January 2016
Executive Board
Morten Hübbe
Group CEO
Tor Magne Lønnum
Group CFO
Lars Bonde
Group COO
Supervisory Board
Jørgen Huno Rasmussen
Chairman
Torben Nielsen
Deputy Chairman
Anya Eskildsen
Vigdis Fossehagen
Lone Hansen
Jesper Hjulmand
Ida Sofie Jensen
Bill-Owe Johansson
Lene Skole
Tina Snejbjerg
Mari Thjømøe
Carl-Viggo Östlund
| Contents – Financial statements
38
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Independent auditor’s reports
To the shareholders of Tryg A/S
financial services companies as well as for the
preparation of consolidated and parent financial
Report on the consolidated financial
statements and parent financial
statements
preparation of parent financial statements that give
statements that give a true and fair view in order to
a true and fair view in accordance with the Danish
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
Financial Business Act and Danish disclosure
circumstances, but not for the purpose of express-
Pursuant to the Danish Financial Business Act, we
requirements for listed financial services compa-
ing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s in-
have read the management’s review. We have not
nies, and for such internal control as management
ternal control. An audit also includes evaluating the
performed any further procedures in addition to
Statement on the management’s
review
We have audited the consolidated and parent
determines is necessary to enable the preparation
appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the audit of the consolidated and parent financial
financial statements of Tryg A/S for the financial
and fair presentation of consolidated and parent
the reasonableness of accounting estimates made
statements. On this basis, it is our opinion that the
year 1 January to 31 December 2015, page 40-99,
financial statements that are free from material
by management, as well as the overall presentation
information provided in the management’s review
which comprise the income statement, statement
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
of the consolidated and parent financial statements.
is consistent with the consolidated and parent
of comprehensive income, statement of financial
We believe that the audit evidence is sufficient and
financial statements.
position, statement of changes in equity and notes,
Auditor’s responsibility
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
including the accounting policies, for the Group as
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Our audit has not resulted in any qualification.
well as for the parent company, and the consolidat-
consolidated and parent financial statements based
ed cash flow statement. The consolidated financial
on our audit. We conducted our audit in accord-
Opinion
Ballerup, 21 January 2016
statements are prepared in accordance with Inter-
ance with International Standards on Auditing
In our opinion, the consolidated financial state-
Deloitte
national Financial Reporting Standards as adopted
and additional requirements under Danish audit
ments give a true and fair view of the Group’s
Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab
by the EU and the parent financial statements are
regulation. This requires that we comply with ethi-
financial position at 31 December 2015, and of
CVR-nr. 33 96 35 56
prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial
cal requirements and plan and perform the audit
the results of its operations and cash flows for the
Business Act. In addition, the consolidated and
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
financial year 1 January to 31 December 2015 in
parent financial statements are prepared in accord-
the con solidated and parent financial statements
accordance with International Financial Reporting
ance with Danish disclosure requirements for listed
are free from material misstatement. An audit
Standards as adopted by the EU and Danish dis-
financial services companies.
involves performing procedures to obtain audit
closure requirements for listed financial services
Jens Ringbæk
evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
companies. Moreover, in our opinion, the parent
State Authorised Public Accountant
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated
the consolidated and parent financial statements.
financial statements give a true and fair view of the
financial statements and parent financial statements
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
parent company’s financial position at 31 December
Management is responsible for the preparation
judgement, including the assessment of the risks
2015, and of the results of its operations for the
of consolidated financial statements that give a
of material misstatements of the consolidated and
financial year 1 January to 31 December 2015 in
true and fair view in accordance with International
parent financial statements, whether due to fraud
accordance with the Danish Financial Business
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
or error. In making those risk assessments, the audi-
Act and Danish disclosure requirements for listed
Lone Møller Olsen
EU and Danish disclosure requirements for listed
tor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
financial services companies.
State Authorised Public Accountant
| Contents – Financial statements
39
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Financial highlights
DKKm
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Total insurance operating costs
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Investment return after insurance technical interest
Other income and costs
Profit/loss before tax
Tax
Profit/loss on continuing business
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business after tax a)
Profit/loss
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Statement of financial position
Total provisions for insurance contracts
Total reinsurers' share of provisions for insurance contracts
Total equity
Total assets
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Gross expense ratio without adjustment
Operating ratio
Relative run-off gains/losses
Return on equity after tax (%)
17,977
-13,562
-2,720
18,652
-12,650
-2,689
19,504
-14,411
-3,008
20,314
-14,675
-3,295
19,948
-15,783
-3,271
1,695
710
18
2,423
-5
-91
2,327
-395
1,932
49
1,981
1,212
31,571
3,176
9,831
51,281
75.4
-3.9
71.5
15.3
86.8
15.1
86.5
4.8
18.9
3,313
-341
60
3,032
360
-90
3,302
-755
2,547
10
2,557
1,131
31,692
1,938
11,119
52,224
67.8
1.8
69.6
14.6
84.2
14.4
83.8
4.8
23.0
87
2,085
349
62
2,496
588
-91
2,993
-620
2,373
-4
2,369
970
32,939
2,620
11,107
53,371
73.9
-1.8
72.1
15.6
87.7
15.4
87.2
3.9
21.5
90
2,344
86
62
2,492
585
-60
3,017
-837
2,180
28
2,208
1,015
34,355
2,317
10,979
55,022
72.2
-0.4
71.8
16.4
88.2
16.2
87.8
4.1
22.1
90
894
507
171
1,572
61
-30
1,603
-455
1,148
-8
1,140
944
34,220
2,067
9,007
53,362
79.1
-2.5
76.6
16.6
93.2
16.4
92.2
4.0
13.1
112
Solvency ratio (Solvency I – ratio between base capital and weighted assets)
108
The gross expense ratio without adjustment is calculated
as the ratio of actual gross insurance operating costs to
gross premium income.
Other key ratios are calculated in accordance with
''Recommendations & Financial Ratios 2015'' issued by
the Danish Society of Financial Analysts.
The adjustment, which is made pursuant to the Danish
Financial Supervisory Authority’s and the Danish Society
of Financial Analysts’ definitions of expense ratio and
combined ratio, involves the addition of a calculated
expense (rent) in respect of owner-occupied property
based on a calculated market rent and the deduction
of actual depreciation and operating costs on owner-
occupied property
a) Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business after
tax includes mainly Marine Hull insurance and the
Finnish branch of Tryg Forsikring, which was sold in
2012.
| Contents – Financial statements
40
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Income statement
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
Note General insurance
Gross premiums written
Ceded insurance premiums
Change in premium provisions
Change in reinsurers' share of premium provisions
3
Premium income, net of reinsurance
18,150
-1,165
61
1
17,047
18,672
-1,059
268
-57
17,824
Note
14
7
8
7
Investment activities
Income from associates
Income from investment property
Interest income and dividends
Value adjustments
Interest expenses
Administration expenses in connection with investment activities
4
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
18
60
Claims paid
Reinsurance cover received
Change in claims provisions
Change in the reinsurers' share of claims provisions
5 Claims, net of reinsurance
-13,095
471
-467
1,301
-11,790
-13,695
1,361
1,045
-688
-11,977
Bonus and premium discounts
-234
-288
Acquisition costs
Administration expenses
Acquisition costs and administration expenses
Reinsurance commissions and profit participation from reinsurers
6
Insurance operating costs, net of reinsurance
-2,042
-678
-2,720
102
-2,618
-1,955
-734
-2,689
102
-2,587
2
Technical result
2,423
3,032
Total investment return
4
Return on insurance provisions
Total investment return after insurance technical interest
Other income
Other costs
Profit/loss before tax
Tax
9
Profit/loss on continuing business
10
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business
42
94
794
-493
-95
-88
254
-259
-5
81
-172
2,327
-395
1,932
49
10
94
949
-95
-115
-69
774
-414
360
81
-171
3,302
-755
2,547
10
Profit/loss for the year
1,981
2,557
25
Earnings per share – continuing business
Diluted earnings per share – continuing business
Earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
6.77
6.77
6.95
6.95
8.70
8.70
8.74
8.73
| Contents – Financial statements
41
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Statement of comprehensive income
DKKm
Note
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income which cannot
subsequently be reclassified as profit or loss
Change in equalisation provision and other provisions
Change in taxes on security provisions
Revaluation of owner-occupied property for the year
Tax on revaluation of owner-occupied property for the year
Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans
Tax on actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans
Other comprehensive income which can subsequently
be reclassified as profit or loss
Exchange rate adjustments of foreign entities for the year
Hedging of currency risk in foreign entities for the year
Tax on hedging of currency risk in foreign entities for the year
Total other comprehensive income
Comprehensive income
2015
1,981
21
141
4
2
-12
3
159
-89
86
-21
-24
135
2,116
2014
2,557
26
0
2
0
-46
12
-6
-178
191
-47
-34
-40
2,517
| Contents – Financial statements
42
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Statement of financial position
DKKm
Note
11
Assets
Intangible assets
Operating equipment
Owner-occupied property
Assets under construction
12
Total property, plant and equipment
13
Investment property
14
Equity investments in associates
Total investments in associates
Equity investments
Unit trust units
Bonds
Deposits with credit institutions
Derivative financial instruments
Total other financial investment assets
15
Total investment assets
Reinsurers' share of premium provisions
Reinsurers' share of claims provisions
19
16
Total reinsurers' share of provisions for insurance contracts
Receivables from policyholders
Total receivables in connection with direct insurance contracts
Receivables from insurance enterprises
Other receivables
15
Total receivables
17 Current tax assets
Cash at bank and in hand
Total other assets
Interest and rent receivable
Other prepayments and accrued income
Total prepayments and accrued income
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
Note
18
Equity and liabilities
Equity
1
Subordinate loan capital
Premium provisions
19
19 Claims provisions
Provisions for bonuses and premium discounts
Total provisions for insurance contracts
Pensions and similar obligations
20
21 Deferred tax liability
22 Other provisions
Total provisions
Debt relating to direct insurance
Debt relating to reinsurance
Amounts owed to credit institutions
23
24 Debt relating to unsettled funds transactions and repos
15 Derivative financial instruments
17 Current tax liabilities
Other debt
Total debt
Accruals and deferred income
9,831
1,698
5,571
25,427
573
31,571
264
701
132
1,097
603
330
64
4,074
612
357
1,001
7,041
43
11,119
1,768
5,810
25,272
610
31,692
342
1,022
83
1,447
565
188
116
2,902
799
429
1,153
6,152
46
Total equity and liabilities
51,281
52,224
1
26
27
28
29
30
Risk and capital management
Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities
Acquisition of subsidiaries
Related parties
Financial highlights
Accounting policies
1,038
62
1,144
2
1,208
1,838
229
229
138
3,589
35,705
0
843
40,275
42,342
173
3,003
3,176
1,261
1,261
199
871
2,331
118
471
589
281
316
597
984
97
1,153
11
1,261
1,828
225
225
128
3,884
37,175
667
1,318
43,172
45,225
219
1,719
1,938
1,232
1,232
208
222
1,662
0
505
505
337
312
649
Total assets
51,281
52,224
| Contents – Financial statements
43
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Statement of changes in equity
Reserve for
DKKm
Share Revaluation- exchange rate Equalisation-
reserve
capital
adjustment
reserves
Other
reservesa)
Retained
earnings
Proposed
dividend
Total
Equity at 31 December 2014
1,492
80
15
106
848
6,847
1,731
11,119
2015
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
Nullification of own shares
Dividend paid
Dividend own shares
Purchase and sale of own shares
Exercise of share options
Issue of employee shares
Issue of share options and matching shares
Total changes in equity in 2015
Equity at 31 December 2015
Equity at 31 December 2013
2014
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
Nullification of own shares
Dividend paid
Dividend, own shares
Purchase and sale of own shares
Exercise of share options
Issue of employee shares
Issue of share options and matching shares
Total changes in equity in 2014
Equity at 31 December 2014
6
6
-24
-24
22
-1
21
-104
22
-82
6
86
78
2
2
-24
-9
21
127
-82
766
-34
-34
60
-15
45
-81
41
-40
0
-44
-44
1,448
1,533
0
-41
-41
1,492
2
80
-34
15
45
106
-40
848
304
132
436
44
97
-1,044
13
2
5
-447
6,400
1,759
1,759
-2,477
-718
1,013
1,981
135
2,116
0
-2,477
97
-1,044
13
2
5
-1,288
9,831
847
-34
813
41
59
-1,005
49
45
3
5
1,731
1,731
-1,656
75
2,557
-40
2,517
0
-1,656
59
-1,005
49
45
3
12
6,847
1,731
11,119
49
61
888
6,842
1,656
11,107
Dividend per share in 2015 includes dividend paid out
in July of DKK 2.5 and proposed dividend of DKK 3.5,
totalling DKK 6.0 (DKK 5.8 in 2014 ). Proposed dividend
per share of DKK 3.50 is calculated as the total dividend
proposed by the Supervisory Board after the end of the
financial year divided by the total number of shares at
the end of the year (289,559,550 shares). The dividend is
not paid until approved by the shareholders at the annual
general meeting.
The possible payment of dividend from Tryg Forsikring
A/S to Tryg A/S is influenced by contingency fund
provisions of DKK 2,516m (DKK 2,622m in 2014)
The contingency fund provisions can be used to cover
losses in connection with the settlement of insurance
provisions or otherwise for the benefit of the insured.
a) Other reserves contains Norwegian Natural
Perils Pool
| Contents – Financial statements
44
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Cash flow statement
DKKm
Note
Cash from operating activities
Premiums
Claims
Ceded business
Costs
Change in other debt and other amounts receivable
Cash flow from insurance activities
Interest income
Interest expenses
Dividend received
Taxes
Other income and costs
Cash from operating activities, continuing business
Cash from operating activities, discontinued and divested business
Total cash flow from operating activities
Investments
Purchase and refurbishment of property
Sale of property
Purchase/sale of equity investments and unit trust units (net)
Purchase/sale of bonds (net)
Deposits with credit institutions
Purchase/sale of operating equipment (net)
Acquisition of intangible assets
Hedging of currency risk
Investments, continuing business
Investments, discontinued and divested business
Total investments
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
Note
Financing
Exercise of share options/purchase of own shares (net)
Subordinate loan capital
Dividend paid
Change in amounts owed to credit institutions
Financing, continuing business
Total financing
Change in cash and cash equivalents, net
Additions relating to purchase of subsidiaries
Exchange rate adjustment of cash and cash equivalents, 1 January
Change in cash and cash equivalents, gross
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December
-1,031
12
-2,380
-53
-3,452
-3,452
-37
0
3
-34
505
471
-956
0
-1,656
110
-2,502
-2,502
-37
14
-25
-48
553
505
17,721
-13,040
-412
-2,771
-158
1,340
807
-95
47
-765
-91
1,243
-32
1,211
-46
10
480
1,070
641
0
0
86
2,241
-37
2,204
18,139
-13,584
229
-2,862
-190
1,732
995
-115
39
-512
-90
2,049
-58
1,991
-14
7
291
-386
630
-17
-228
191
474
0
474
| Contents – Financial statements
45
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
1 Risk and capital management
Risk management in Tryg
The Supervisory Board defines the company’s risk
appetite through its business model and strategy,
and this is operationalised through the company’s
policies. The company’s risk management forms
the basis for the risk profile being in line with the
specified risk appetite at all times.
Tryg’s risk profile is continuously measured, quantified
and reported to the management and the Supervisory
Board. Given the extensive requirements for the
Super visory Board’s involvement in capital and risk
management, Tryg’s Supervisory Board has decided
to set up a special Risk Committee to address these
topics separately during the year. The Committee
meets five times a year for a detailed review of various
risk management topics and regularly keeps the en-
tire Supervisory Board up-to-date on the status.
Tryg’s risk management is organised into three levels
of control. The first level of control is handled in the
business where the company’s policies are imple-
mented, and day-to-day compliance is verified. This is
supported by decentralised risk managers affiliated
with the individual areas. The risk management func-
tion is the second level of control, and ensures a con-
Lines of defence
Supervisory Board
sistent approach across the organization, risk assess-
ment at group level and reporting to the management
and the Supervisory Board. This involves an ongoing
identification and assessment of the most significant
risks in the company. Furthermore, the function pre-
pares specific recommendations in relation to capital
management, reinsurance, investment risk manage-
ment and more. Tryg’s risk management function is
also responsible for determining the company’s capital.
The third level consists of the internal audit which
performs independent assessments of the entire
control environment.
Capital management
Tryg’s capital management is based on the key
business objectives:
•
•
•
A solid capital base, supporting both the statutory
requirements and a ‘A-’ rating from Standard &
Poor’s.
Support of a steadily rising nominal dividend per
share, where 60-90% of the annual net profit is
paid out in two instalments.
Return on the average equity of at least 20%
after tax. However 21% from 2017.
What risk profile does Tryg want?
- Business model
- Strategy
- Policies
How is this supported?
Tactically
- Policies
- Capital plan
- Contingency plan
Operationally
- Frameworks
- Limitations
- Instructions
- Allocated capital
- Contingency plans
How is the actual risk profile measured?
Tactically
- Risk reports
- Internal controls
- Capital model
- Stress tests
Tryg's risk management environment
1. Line of defence
2. Line of defence
3. Line of defence
External audit
• Operational control
• Business controls
• Risk management
• Compliance
• Actuarial function
• Internal audit
Executive Management
| Contents – Financial statements
Supervisory
Board
• Risk appetite
• Capital
• Strategy
• Crisis
management
Supervisory Board’s
Risk Committee
Risk management environment
Policies
Executive Management
Policies
Risk reporting
Recommen-
dations
Insurance
Risk
Committee
Model
Risk
Committee
Investment
Risk
Committee
Operational
Risk
Committee
Systematic risk
assessment
Reporting
• Contingency
• Control
• Risk
identification
• Risk
management
46
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Viewed in isolation, in order to fulfil the first two
objectives, the company’s capital buffer must be as
large as possible, while the third objective is best
achieved by keeping the capital buffer to a minimum
or by ensuring that the capital base is mainly made up
of subordinate loan capital. The balance between the
different objectives and the resulting capital require-
ment is assessed in the company’s capital plan.
The capital base is continuously measured against
the individual solvency requirement calculated on
the basis of Tryg’s partial internal model, where
insurance risks are modelled using an internal model,
while other risks are described using the Solvency II
standard model.
The model calculates Tryg’s capital requirement with
99.5% solvency level with a 1-year horizon, which
means that Tryg will be able to fulfil its obligations in
199 out of 200 years. The partial internal model has
been used for a number of years, and was approved
by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority in 2015
which means that the present solvency requirement
will be maintained as Solvency II has come into force
as of 1 January 2016.
The introduction of Solvency II will have a major
influence on Tryg’s capital position in various areas
from 1 January 2016. The Solvency capital require-
ment will decrease by approximately DKK 1.200m
due to the inclusion of the loss absorbency capacity
of deferred tax. The capital base will increase by
approximately DKK 400m due to the inclusion of ex-
pected future profits (DKK 600m) and the transition
to a new Solvency II discounting curve (DKK -200m).
The net effect form these new elements will result in
a relative large increase in the capital buffer, where
the core equity will constitute a lesser part of the
capital base.
Tryg has two subordinated loans that amount to
DKK 1,707m. The first is a NOK 1,400m loan that was
issued in November 2015 and is classified as a Tier 2
element under Solvency II. The second is a NOK
800m loan that was issued in March 2013 and is ac-
cordingly to the grandfathering rules treated as a Tier
1 element under Solvency II.
Read more about Tryg’s capitalisation after the
introduction of Solvency II in the newsletter.
Company’s own risk assessment ‘ORSA’
(Own Risk and Solvency Assessment)
ORSA is the company’s own risk assessment based
on the Solvency II principles, which implies that Tryg
must assess all material risks that the company is or
may be exposed to. The ORSA report also contains an
assessment of whether the calculation of solvency
capital requirement is reasonable and is reflecting
Tryg’s actual risk profile. Moreover, the projected capital
requirement is also assessed over the company’s
strategic planning period. Tryg’s risk activities are
implemented via continuous risk management pro-
cesses, where the main results are reported to the
Supervisory Board and the risk committee during the
year, while the ORSA report is an annual summary
document assessing all these processes and present-
ing the total risk picture to Tryg’s Supervisory Board.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk comprises two main types of risks:
underwriting risk and provisioning risk.
Underwriting risk
Underwriting risk is the risk that insurance premiums
will not be sufficient to cover the compensations and
other costs associated with the insurance business.
Underwriting risk is managed primarily through the
company’s insurance policy defined by the Super-
visory Board, and administered through business
procedures, underwriting guidelines etc. Underwriting
risk is assessed in Tryg’s capital model, determining
the capital impact from insurance products.
Reinsurance is used to reduce the underwriting risk
in situations where this can not be achieved to a suffi-
cient degree via ordinary diversification. In case of
major events involving damage to buildings and
contents, Tryg’s reinsurance programme provides
protection for up to DKK 5.75bn, which statistically
is sufficient to cover at least a 250-year event. Reten-
tion for such events is DKK 150m. In the event of a
frequency of natural disasters, Tryg is covered for
up to DKK 600m for, after total annual retention of
DKK 300m. Tryg has also taken out reinsurance for
the risk of large claims occurring in sectors with very
large sums insured. Tryg’s largest individual building
and contents risks are covered by up to DKK 2bn. Re-
tention for large claims is DKK 100m, gradually drop-
ping to DKK 25m. Single risks exceeding DKK 2bn are
covered individually. Tryg has combined the minimum
cover of other sectors into a joint cover with retention
of DKK 100m for the first claim and DKK 25m for sub-
sequent claims. For the individual sectors, individual
cover has subsequently been taken out as needed.
For Tryg’s subsidiary Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S, the
maximum retention is DKK 30m. The use of reinsur-
ance creates a natural counterparty risk. This risk be
handled by applying a wide range of reinsurers with
at least an ‘A’ rating and USD 100m in capital.
Reserving risk
Reserving risk relates to the risk of Tryg’s insurance
provisions being inadequate. The Supervisory Board
lays down the overall framework for the handling of
reserving risk in the insurance policy, while the overall
risk is measured in the capital model. The uncertainty
associated with the calculation of claims reserves af-
fects Tryg’s results through the run-off on reserves.
Long-tailed reserves in particular are subject to inter-
est rate and inflation risk. Interest rate risk is hedged
by means of Tryg’s match portfolio which corre-
sponds to the discounted claims reserves. In order to
manage the inflation risk of Danish workers’ compen-
sation claims reserves, Tryg has bought zero coupon
inflation swaps. Tryg determines the claims reserves
via statistical methods as well as individual assess-
ments. At the end of 2015, Tryg’s claims reserves
totalled DKK 25,427m with an average duration of
4,0 years.
Investment risk
The overall framework for managing investment risk is
defined by the Supervisory Board in Tryg’s investment
policy. In overall terms, Tryg’s investment portfolio is
divided into a match portfolio and a free portfolio. The
match portfolio corresponds to the value of the dis-
counted claims reserves and is designed to hedge the
interest rate sensitivity of these as closely as possible.
Tryg carries out daily monitoring, follow-up and risk
management of the Group’s interest rate risk. The
swap and bond portfolio is thus adjusted continuously
to minimise the net interest rate risk.
The free portfolio is subject to the framework defined
by the Supervisory Board through the investment
policy. The purpose of the free portfolio is to achieve
the highest possible return relative to risk. Tryg’s
equity portfolio constitutes the company’s largest in-
vestment risk. At the end of 2015, the equity portfolio
accounted for 5.9% of the total investment assets. This
share is expected to be at a similar level in 2016. Tryg’s
property portfolio mainly comprises owner-occupied
and investment properties, the value of which is ad-
justed based on the conditions on the property market
through internal valuations backed by external valua-
tions. At the end of 2015, investment properties
accounted for 5.1%, while owner-occupied properties
accounted for 3.0% of the total investment assets.
| Contents – Financial statements
47
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Property investments are expected to be at a similar
level in 2016. Tryg’s does not wish to speculate in
foreign currency, but since Tryg invests and operates
its insurance business in other currencies than Danish
kroner, Tryg is exposed to currency risk. Tryg is primarily
exposed to fluctuations in the other Scandinavian
currencies due to its ongoing insurance activities.
Premiums earned and compensation paid in other cur-
rencies create a natural currency hedge, for which rea-
son other risk mitigation measures are not required in
this area. However, the part of equity held in other cur-
rencies than Danish kroner will be exposed to currency
risk. This risk is hedged on an ongoing basis using cur-
rency swaps. In addition to the above-mentioned risks,
Tryg is exposed to credit, counterparty and concentra-
tion risk. These risks primarily relate to exposures in
high-yield bonds, emerging market debt exposures as
well as Tryg’s investments in AAA-rated Nordic and Eu-
ropean government and mortgage bonds. These risks
are also managed through the investment policy and
the framework for reinsurance defined in the insurance
policy. For an insurance company like Tryg, liquidity risk
is practically non-existent, as premium payments fall
due before claims payments. The only significant as-
sets on Tryg’s balance sheet, which by nature is some-
what illiquid, are the property portfolio.
Operational risk
Operational risk relates to errors or failures in internal
procedures, fraud, breakdown of infrastructure, IT
security and similar factors. As operational risks are
mainly internal, Tryg focuses on an adequate control
environment for its operations. In practice, this work
is organised by means of procedures, controls and
guidelines covering the various aspects of the Group’s
operations. The Supervisory Board defines the overall
framework for managing operational risk in Tryg’s IT
security policy and operational risk policy. These risks
are controlled via the Operational Risk Committee.
A special crisis management structure is set up to
deal with the eventuality that Tryg is hit by major crises.
This comprises a Crisis Management Team at Group
level, national contingency teams at country level and
finally business contingency in the individual areas.
Tryg has prepared contingency plans to address the
most important areas. In addition, comprehensive IT
contingency plans have been established, primarily
focusing on the business-critical systems.
Other risks
Strategic risk
The strategic risk is the risk of loss as a result of Tryg’s
chosen strategic position. The strategic position covers
both business transactions, IT strategy, choice of
business partners and changed market conditions.
Tryg’s strategic position is determined by Tryg’s Super -
visory Board in close collaboration with the Executive
Board. Before determining the strategic position, the
strategic decisions are subjected to a risk assessment,
explaining the risk of the chosen strategy to Tryg’s
Supervisory Board and Executive Board.
Compliance risk
Compliance risk is the risk of loss as a result of lack of
compliance with rules and regulations. The handling
of compliance risk is coordinated centrally via the
Group’s legal department, which, among other things,
sits on industry committees in connection with legis-
lative monitoring, ensures implementation in Tryg
through business procedures and participates in the
ongoing training of the organisation.
Emerging risk
Emerging risk cover new risks or known risks, with
changing characteristics. The management of this
type of risk will be handled in the individual business
areas, which monitor the market and adapt the
products as the conditions change. In the event of a
change in insurance terms, it is ensured that Tryg’s re-
insurance cover is consistent with the new conditions.
Sensitivity analysis
Insurance risk
DKKm
Effect of 1 percentage point change in:
Combined ratio (1 percentage point)
Claim frequency (1 percentage point)
Average claim
Premium rates
Provisioning risk
1% change in inflation on person-related lines of business a)
10% error in the assessment of long-tailed lines of business
(workers' compensation, motor liability, liability, accident)
Investment risk
Interest rate market
Effect of 1 % increase in interest curve:
Impact of interest-bearing securities
Higher discounting of claims provisions
Net effect of interest rate rise
Impact of Norwegian pension obligation b)
Equity market
15 % decline in equity market
Impact of derivatives
Real estate market
15 % decline in real estate markets
Currency market
Equity:
15 % decline in exposed currency (exclusive of EUR) relative to DKK
Impact of derivatives
Net impact of exchange rate decline
Technical result per year:
Impact of 15% change in NOK and SEK exchange rates relative to DKK
2015
2014
+/- 177
+/- 1,450
+/- 132
+/-175
+ / -184
+/- 1,369
+/-122
+/- 190
+/- 476
+/- 300
+/- 1,671
+/- 1,752
-940
947
7
153
-341
-7
-480
-647
614
-33
-880
793
-87
87
-393
-72
-488
-835
791
-44
+/- 176
+/- 230
a) Including the effect of the zero coupon inflation swap.
b) Additional sensitivity information in note 20 'Pensions and similar obligations'.
| Contents – Financial statements
48
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Claims provisions – estimated accumulated claims – DKKm
Gross
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
10,935
10,825
10,685
10,315
10,460
10,405
10,311
10,323
10,294
10,189
10,020
10,020
-9,746
273
-41
Estimated accumulated claims
End of year
1 year later
2 year later
3 year later
4 year later
5 year later
6 year later
7 year later
8 year later
9 year later
10 year later
Cumulative payments to date
Provisions before
discounting, end of year
Discounting
Reserves from 2004
and prior years
Other reserves
Gross provisions
for claims, end of year
10,711
10,972
10,515
10,743
10,679
10,671
10,649
10,612
10,428
10,361
10,361
-9,771
589
-68
11,629
12,199
12,773
12,752
12,755
12,661
12,535
12,529
12,461
12,162
13,500
13,383
13,396
13,357
13,262
13,231
12,981
13,534
14,189
14,204
14,002
13,884
13,787
13,770
15,782
15,884
15,836
15,718
15,631
15,567
16,126
16,516
16,515
16,466
16,304
13,659
13,644
13,581
13,431
13,532
13,845
13,682
12,841
13,188
14,853
12,461
-11,610
12,981
-11,796
13,770
-12,386
15,567
-13,967
16,304
-14,383
13,431
-11,187
13,682
-11,048
851
-99
1,185
-138
1,384
-156
1,600
-161
1,921
-159
2,245
-174
2,634
-167
13,188
-9,504
3,685
-205
14,853
-6,714
146,618
-122,112
8,139
-193
24,506
-1,561
2,127
355
25,427
| Contents – Financial statements
49
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Claims provisions – estimated accumulated claims – DKKm
Ceded business
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Estimated accumulated claims
End of year
1 year later
2 year later
3 year later
4 year later
5 year later
6 year later
7 year later
8 year later
9 year later
10 year later
Cumulative payments to date
915
811
816
811
840
836
822
822
814
826
823
823
-811
Provisions before discounting,
end of year
Discounting
Reserves from 2004
and prior years
Other reserves
Provisions for claims, end of year
12
-1
272
272
259
292
293
288
287
288
286
286
286
-278
8
-1
498
465
480
485
505
476
505
496
496
496
-483
14
-1
155
220
189
179
179
166
171
165
165
-159
7
0
284
354
332
289
292
297
292
292
-283
10
0
668
748
738
714
723
744
744
-685
60
-1
1,449
2,145
2,267
2,307
2,271
2,271
-2,176
95
-1
228
259
297
304
304
-264
40
-1
550
961
942
942
-642
300
-3
250
302
2,068
302
-213
88
-2
2,068
-41
2,027
-7
8,695
-6,034
2,660
-17
210
151
3,003
| Contents – Financial statements
50
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Claims provisions – estimated accumulated claims – DKKm
Net of reinsurance
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
10,439
10,700
10,256
10,450
10,386
10,383
10,362
10,323
10,142
10,075
10,075
-9,493
582
-68
Estimated accumulated claims
End of year
1 year later
2 year later
3 year later
4 year later
5 year later
6 year later
7 year later
8 year later
9 year later
10 year later
10,020
10,014
9,869
9,504
9,619
9,569
9,489
9,502
9,481
9,363
9,196
9,196
Cumulative payments to date -8,935
261
-40
Provisions before discounting,
end of year
Discounting
Reserves from 2004
and prior years
Other reserves
Provisions for claims,
net of reinsurance,
end of the year
11,131
11,734
12,293
12,267
12,250
12,186
12,030
12,033
11,965
12,007
13,280
13,194
13,217
13,178
13,096
13,059
12,816
13,250
13,835
13,872
13,713
13,592
13,491
13,477
15,115
15,137
15,098
15,004
14,907
14,823
14,677
14,370
14,248
14,160
14,033
13,432
13,386
13,284
13,127
12,982
12,884
12,740
12,591
12,886
12,786
11,965
-11,128
12,816
-11,637
13,477
-12,103
14,823
-13,282
14,033
-12,206
13,127
-10,923
12,740
-10,406
837
-98
1,179
-138
1,374
-156
1,540
-160
1,826
-157
2,204
-173
2,334
-164
12,886
-9,290
3,596
-204
12,786
-6,675
137,924
-116,079
6,112
-186
21,846
-1,543
1,917
204
22,424
Other provisions comprise the claims provisions for Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S.
The amounts in foreign currency in the table are translated to Danish kroner using the exchange rate at 31 December 2015 to prevent the impact of exchange rate fluctuations.
| Contents – Financial statements
51
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Claims provisions (continued)
DKKm
2015
Premium provisions, gross
Premium provisions, ceded
Claims provisions, gross
Claims provisions, ceded
2014
Premium provisions, gross
Premium provisions, ceded
Claims provisions, gross
Claims provisions, ceded
Expected cash flow, not discounted
0-1 year
1-2 years
2-3 years
> 3 years
Other
Total
5,149
-146
9,045
-1,959
12,089
5,337
-156
9,041
-529
13,693
126
0
4,029
-395
3,760
130
0
4,282
-311
4,101
67
0
2,646
-213
2,500
124
0
2,716
-199
2,641
87
0
11,150
-311
10,926
133
0
9,945
-263
9,815
142
-28
357
-151
320
86
-22
678
-451
291
5,571
-174
27,227
-3,029
29,595
5,810
-178
26,662
-1,753
30,541
Other comprises Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S and premium provisions in Securator A/S.
| Contents – Financial statements
52
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
Investment risk
Bond portfolio including interest derivatives
Duration 1 year or less
Duration 1 year-5 years
Duration 5-10 years
Duration more than 10 years
Total
Duration
The option adjusted duration is used to measure duration. The option adjustment relates primarily
to Danish mortgage bonds and reflects the expected duration-shortening effect of the borrower's
option to cause the bond to be redeemed through the mortgage institution at any point in time.
Listed shares
Nordic countries
United Kingdom
Rest of Europe
United States
Asia etc.
Total
The portfolio of unlisted shares totals
2015
52
90
501
1,165
516
2,324
138
2015
2014
Impact of exchange rate fluctuations in SEK and NOK on technical result
14,856
13,011
4,175
2,363
34,405
2.5
2015
2014
Change
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Total insurance operating costs
17,977
-13,562
-2,720
1,695
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
710
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance 18
Technical result
2,423
18,652
-12,650
-2,689
3,313
-341
60
3,032
-675
-912
-31
-1,618
1,051
-42
-609
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Total insurance operating costs
Profit/loss on gross business
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest,
net of reinsurance
Technical result
2014
2013
Change
18,652
-12,650
-2,689
3,313
-341
19,504
-14,411
-3,008
2,085
349
60
62
3,032
2,496
-852
1,761
319
1,228
-690
-2
536
Currency
effect
Change excl.
currency
effect
-534
374
81
-79
11
-2
-70
-141
-1,286
-112
-1,539
1,040
-40
-539
Currency
effect
Change excl.
currency
effect
-642
437
86
-119
10
-3
-112
-210
1,324
233
1,347
-700
1
648
16,622
13,925
4,129
2,836
37,512
2.2
2014
413
207
674
1,096
563
2,953
128
The share portfolio includes exposure from share derivatives of DKK 47m (DKK 477m in 2014)
Unlisted equity investments are based on an estimated market price.
Exposure to exchange rate risk
2015
2014
Assets and
debt
Hedge
Exposure
Assets and
debt
Hedge
Exposure
2,355
633
197
1,991
1,114
477
-2,313
-524
-189
-1,867
-1,007
-429
42
109
8
124
107
48
438
1,952
530
79
3,701
1,076
541
-1,918
706
-69
-3,507
-998
-474
34
1,236
10
194
78
67
1,619
USD
EUR
GBP
NOK
SEK
Other
Total
| Contents – Financial statements
53
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Impact of exchange rate fluctuations in SEK and NOK on the statement of financial position
Credit risk
DKKm
2015
2014
Change
Currency
effect
Change excl.
currency
effect
Assets
Intangible assets
Total property, plant and equipment
Investment property
Investments in associates
Other financial investment assets
Reinsurers' share of provisions
for insurance contracts
Receivables
Other assets
Prepayments and accrued income
1,038
1,208
1,838
229
40,275
3,176
2,331
589
597
984
1,261
1,828
225
43,172
1,938
1,662
505
649
Total assets
51,281
52,224
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Subordinate loan capital
Provisions for insurance contracts
Total provisions
Other debt
Accruals and deferred income
Total equity and liabilities
9,831
1,698
31,571
1,097
7,041
43
51,281
11,119
1,768
31,692
1,447
6,152
46
52,224
54
-53
10
4
-2,897
1,238
669
84
-52
-943
-1,288
-70
-121
-350
889
-3
-943
12
-26
-20
-1
-704
-45
-19
0
-3
-806
0
-82
-518
-43
-163
0
-806
42
-27
30
5
-2,193
1,283
688
84
-49
-137
-1,288
12
397
-307
1,052
-3
-137
| Contents – Financial statements
Bond portfolio by ratings
AAA to A
Other
Not rated
Total
Reinsurance balances
AAA to A
Other
Not rated
Total
2015
DKKm
35,181
523
1
35,705
2,772
0
120
2,892
%
98.5
1.5
-
2014
DKKm
36,930
244
1
%
99.3
0.7
0.0
100.0
37,175
100.0
95.9
-
4.1
100.0
1,447
1
147
1,595
90.7
0.1
9.2
100.0
Liquidity risk
Maturity of the Group’s financial obligations including interest
2015
0-1 years
1-5 years
> 5 years
Subordinate loan capital
Amounts owed to credit institutions
Debt relating to unsettled funds transactions and repos
Derivative financial instruments
Other debt
2014
Subordinate loan capital
Amounts owed to credit institutions
Debt relating to unsettled funds transactions and repos
Derivative financial instruments
Other debt
66
64
4,074
181
2,291
6,676
87
116
2,902
428
2,335
5,868
263
0
0
219
0
482
243
0
0
225
0
468
3,362
0
0
259
0
3,621
2,209
0
0
189
0
2,398
Interest on loans for a perpetual term has been recognised for the first fifteen years.
Total
3,691
64
4,074
659
2,291
10,779
2,539
116
2,902
842
2,335
8,734
54
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
Subordinate loan capital
The fair value of the loan at the statement of financial position date
The fair value of the loan at the statement of financial
position date is based on a price of
Total capital losses and costs at the statement of the financial position date
Interest expenses for the year
Effective interest rate
Bond loan
EUR 150m
Bond loan
NOK 800m
2015
-
-
-
49
-
2014
1,106
99
3
50
4.5%
2015
671
108
4
34
3.6%
Bond loan
NOK 1,400
2015
1,086
100
6
3
3.9%
2014
714
108
4
40
3.6%
Loan terms:
Lender
Principal
Issue price
Issue date
Maturity year
Loan may be called by lender as from
Repayment profile
Interest structure
Listed bonds
EUR 150m
99.017
December 2005
2025
Called by Tryg in December 2015
Listed bonds
NOK 800m
100
March 2013
Perpetual
2023
Listed bonds
NOK 1,400m
100
November 2015
2045
2025
Interest-only
4.5% (until 2015)
2.1% above EURIBOR 3M (from 2015)
Interest-only
3.75 % above NIBOR 3M (until 2023)
4.75 % above NIBOR 3M (from 2023)
Interest-only
2.75 % above NIBOR 3M (until 2025)
3.75 % above NIBOR 3M (from 2025)
The share of capital included in the calculation of the
capital base total DKK 1,707m (DKK 1,496m in 2014)
The loans are initially recognised at fair value on the
date on which a loan is entered and subsequently
measured at amortised cost.
The loans are taken by Tryg Forsikring A/S.
The creditors have no option to call the loans before
maturity or otherwise terminate the loan agreements.
The loans are automatically accelerated upon the liq-
uidation or bankruptcy of Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Prices used for determination of fair value in respect
of both loans are based on actual traded prices from
Bloomberg.
| Contents – Financial statements
55
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
Private
Commercial
Corporate
Sweden
Other a)
Group
2
Operating segments
2015
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross operating expenses
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Other items
Profit/loss
8,803
-6,074
-1,291
-148
8
1,298
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
324
Intangible assets
Equity investments in associates
Reinsurers' share of premium provisions
Reinsurers' share of claims provisions
Other assets
Total assets
Premium provisions
Claims provisions
Provisions for bonuses and premium discounts
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
17
141
2,342
5,791
457
3,992
-2,612
-683
-44
5
658
388
33
16
408
1,318
6,566
54
3,894
-3,987
-420
877
5
369
351
140
2,422
1,062
11,357
50
1,317
-852
-246
-1
0
218
149
597
0
32
849
1,713
12
-29
-37
-80
26
0
-120
0
408
229
0
0
46,838
0
0
0
9,879
17,977
-13,562
-2,720
710
18
2,423
-442
1,981
1,212
1,038
229
173
3,003
46,838
51,281
5,571
25,427
573
9,879
41,450
Description of segments
Please refer to the accounting principles for a description
of operating segments.
Costs are allocated according to specific keys, which
are believed to provide the best estimate of assessed
resource consumption.
a) Amounts relating to eliminations and in 2015 also
restructuring expenses are included under 'Other'.
Details of amounts in note 2 Geographical segments.
Other assets and liabilities are managed at Group
level and are therefore not allocated to the individual
segments but are included under 'Other'.
| Contents – Financial statements
56
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
Private
Commercial
Corporate
Sweden
Other a)
Group
2
Operating segments
2014
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross operating expenses
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Technical result
Other items
Profit/loss
9,051
-6,129
-1,311
-23
24
1,612
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
357
Intangible assets
Equity investments in associates
Reinsurers' share of premium provisions
Reinsurers' share of claims provisions
Other assets
Total assets
Premium provisions
Claims provisions
Provisions for bonuses and premium discounts
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
10
154
2,423
6,062
488
4,190
-2,673
-664
8
14
875
310
37
12
346
1,425
6,742
51
4,033
-2,872
-446
-304
16
427
421
197
1,181
1,163
10,754
62
1,399
-998
-268
-21
6
118
43
600
0
38
799
1,714
9
-21
22
0
-1
0
0
0
347
225
0
0
49,077
0
0
0
9,413
18,652
-12,650
-2,689
-341
60
3,032
-475
2,557
1,131
984
225
219
1,719
49,077
52,224
5,810
25,272
610
9,413
41,105
| Contents – Financial statements
57
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
2
Geographical segments
Danish general insurance a)
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
a)
Includes Danish general insurance and
Finnish guarantee insurance.
9,346
1,371
512
80.5
-9.2
71.3
13.9
85.2
9,361
1,510
564
66.9
2.1
69.0
15.1
84.1
9,534
1,202
566
79.5
-7.0
72.5
15.0
87.5
9,910
1,441
571
71.1
-0.2
70.9
14.5
85.4
10,019
1,033
770
83.3
-8.1
75.2
15.1
90.3
Number of full-time employees 31 December
1,859
2,007
2,046
2,187
2,315
Norwegian general insurance
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
6,766
844
492
70.9
2.1
73.0
14.9
87.9
7,337
1,478
501
66.5
1.4
67.9
12.5
80.4
7,819
1,258
387
65.1
4.1
69.2
15.3
84.5
8,239
1,017
465
72.4
-1.0
71.4
16.8
88.2
7,916
598
181
73.2
3.2
76.4
17.0
93.4
Number of full-time employees 31 December
1,113
1,167
1,199
1,282
1,338
| Contents – Financial statements
58
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
2
Geographical segments
Swedish general insurance
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Number of full-time employees 31 Dec.
Other b)
Gross premium income
Technical result
Tryg
Gross premium income
Technical result
Investment return
Other income and costs
Profit/loss before tax
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio c)
Combined ratio
b) Amounts relating to eliminations. In 2012 discon-
tinued business and restructuring expenses were
included under 'Other'. In 2014 the costs were
positively affected by a one-time effect regarding
changed pension terms in Norway and they were
negatively affected by a provision in connection
with the transfer to the new it-supplier. The joint
effect was approx DKK 135m. In 2015 costs and
claims were negatively effected by DKK 80m and
DKK 40m respectively due to provisioning for the
efficiency programme.
c)
Adjustment of gross expense ratio included only in
'Tryg '. The adjustment is explained in a footnote to
Financial highlights.
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
1,894
328
208
63.5
1.7
65.2
17.5
82.7
387
-29
-120
1,975
44
66
77.6
2.2
79.8
18.4
98.2
425
-21
0
2,169
36
17
80.6
0.7
81.3
17.6
98.9
458
-18
0
2,183
131
-21
75.3
1.5
76.8
18.6
95.4
444
-18
-97
2,050
-59
-7
82.0
2.6
84.6
20.3
104.9
423
-37
0
17,977
18,652
19,504
20,314
19,948
2,423
-5
-91
2,327
1,212
75.4
-3.9
71.5
15.3
86.8
3,032
360
-90
3,302
1,131
67.8
1.8
69.6
14.6
84.2
2,496
588
-91
2,993
970
73.9
-1.8
72.1
15.6
87.7
2,492
585
-60
3,017
1,015
72.2
-0.4
71.8
16.4
88.2
3,913
189
1,572
61
-30
1,603
944
79.1
-2.5
76.6
16.6
93.2
4,076
242
Number of full-time employees, continuing business at 31 Dec.
Number of full-time employees, discontinued
and divested business at 31 Dec.
3,359
3,599
3,703
0
0
0
| Contents – Financial statements
59
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2 Technical result, net of reinsurance, by line of business
DKKm
Gross premiums written
2015
1,652
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross operating expenses
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance tech. interest, net of reinsurance
1,629
- 1,026
- 219
- 4
2
Technical result
Gross claims ratio
Combined ratio
Claims frequency a)
Average claims DKK b)
Total claims
382
63.0
76.7
4.4%
29,968
40,135
Accident and
health
Health care
Worker’s
compensation
Motor TPL
Motor comprehensive
insurance
Marine, aviation and
cargo insurance
2014
1,692
1,663
- 1,212
- 224
- 7
5
225
72.9
86.8
4.5%
33,560
37,228
2015
321
316
- 255
- 32
- 1
0
28
80.7
91.1
2014
313
314
- 223
- 37
- 1
1
54
71.0
83.1
2015
890
893
- 85
- 103
- 10
1
696
9.5
22.2
2014
951
970
- 155
- 108
- 8
3
702
16.0
27.9
130.3%
3,905
56,697
128.3%
4,334
50,173
17.6%
65,254
10,469
17.4%
79,102
9,463
2015
1,980
1,963
- 1,164
- 339
- 33
2
429
59.3
78.2
5.5%
17,846
77,164
2014
2,098
2,134
- 1,556
- 337
- 51
7
197
72.9
91.1
5.6%
22,248
72,195
2015
3,680
3,573
- 2,446
- 542
- 2
3
586
68.5
83.7
2014
3,747
3,715
- 2,295
- 555
16
11
892
61.8
76.3
2015
332
337
- 218
- 41
- 53
1
26
64.7
92.6
2014
353
320
- 256
- 39
21
1
47
80.0
85.6
17.9%
10,110
241,311
18.1%
10,376
224,791
21.2%
75,653
2,871
19.8%
111,361
2,470
Fire and contents
(Private)
Fire and contents
(Commercial)
Change of ownership
Liability insurance
Credit and guarantee
insurance
Tourist assistance
insurance
Gross premiums written
2015
4,363
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross operating expenses
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance tech. interest, net of reinsurance
4,328
- 3,130
- 647
- 117
2
Technical result
Gross claims ratio
Combined ratio
Claims frequency a)
Average claims DKK b)
Total claims
2014
4,453
4,492
- 3,139
- 671
22
12
716
69.9
84.3
2015
2,427
2,442
- 3,750
- 363
1,438
2
- 231
153.6
109.5
436
72.3
90.0
7.9%
8,742
370,685
7.6%
9,615
333,943
16.1%
116,003
32,331
2014
2,556
2,535
- 1,957
- 376
- 113
7
96
77.2
96.5
15.8%
62,035
29,686
2015
62
64
- 118
- 10
0
0
- 64
184.4
200.0
9.9%
26,008
4,275
2014
62
65
- 63
- 12
0
0
- 10
96.9
115.4
9.2%
20,263
4,255
2015
962
958
- 612
- 153
- 67
1
127
63.9
86.8
10.2%
68,006
10,454
2014
985
979
- 917
- 148
- 10
3
- 93
93.7
109.8
11.3%
81,763
10,454
2015
352
347
247
- 45
- 392
0
157
-71.2
54.8
2014
338
327
16
- 45
- 188
1
111
-4.9
66.4
0.1%
790,685
111
0.1%
1,068,663
83
2015
610
607
- 580
- 81
- 2
1
- 55
95.6
109.2
19.6%
5,893
96,774
The claims frequency is calculated as the number of claims incurred in the year in proportion to the average number of insurance contracts in the year.
a)
b) Average claims are total claims before run-off in the year relative to the number of claims in the year.
| Contents – Financial statements
2014
573
568
- 450
- 79
- 2
2
39
79.2
93.5
19.4%
5,673
79,007
60
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
2 Technical result, net of reinsurance, by line of business
DKKm
Other
insurance c)
Total exclusive of
Norwegian Group Life
Norwegian Group Life
one-year policies
2015
2014
2015
2014
Gross premiums written
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Gross operating expenses
Profit/loss on ceded business
Insurance tech. interest, net of reinsurance
59
60
- 46
- 95
- 46
1
Technical result
Gross claims ratio
Combined ratio
Average claims DKK b)
Total claims
- 126
76.7
311.7
392,147
34
75
84
- 14
- 15
- 20
1
36
16.7
58.3
59,818
220
17,690
18,196
17,517
- 13,183
- 2,670
711
16
18,166
- 12,221
- 2,646
- 341
54
2,391
3,012
75.3
86.4
67.3
83.7
2015
460
460
- 379
- 50
- 1
2
32
82.4
93.5
2014
476
486
- 429
- 43
0
6
20
88.3
97.1
Total
2015
2014
18,150
18,672
17,977
- 13,562
- 2,720
710
18
18,652
- 12,650
- 2,689
- 341
60
2,423
3,032
75.4
86.8
67.8
84.2
b) Average claims are total claims before run-off in the year relative to the number of claims in the year.
c) Other insurance, gross claims and gross operating expenses include restructuring costs of DKK 40m and DKK 80m, respectively, in 2015.
| Contents – Financial statements
61
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
3
Premium income, net of reinsurance
Direct insurance
Indirect insurance
Unexpired risk provision
Ceded direct insurance
Ceded indirect insurance
Direct insurance, by location of risk
2015
2014
Gross
9,419
1,893
6,855
Ceded
-625
-46
-432
Gross
9,488
1,943
7,442
18,167
-1,103
18,873
Denmark
Other EU countries
Other countries a)
a) Mainly Norway
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
18,166
44
18,210
1
18,211
-1,103
-61
17,047
18,872
67
18,939
1
18,940
-1,067
-49
17,824
Ceded
-689
-30
-348
-1,067
6
Insurance operating costs, net of reinsurance
Commissions regarding direct insurance contracts
Other acquisition costs
Total acquisition costs
Administration expenses
Insurance operating costs, gross
Commission from reinsurers
Administrative expenses include fee to the auditors appointed
by the annual general meeting:
Deloitte
The fee is divided into:
Statutory audit
Tax advice
Other services
-368
-1,674
-2,042
-678
-2,720
102
-2,618
-7
-7
-3
-2
-2
-7
-395
-1,560
-1,955
-734
-2,689
102
-2,587
-11
-11
-3
-1
-7
-11
-10
DKKm
4
Insurance technical interest, net of reinsurance
Return on insurance provisions
Discounting transferred from claims provisions
5
Claims, net of reinsurance
Claims
Run-off previous years, gross
Reinsurance cover received
Run-off previous years, reinsurers' share
2015
2014
Expenses have been incurred for the Group´s Internal Audit Department.
-9
In the calculation of the expense ratio, costs are stated exclusive of depreciation and operating costs
on the owner-occupied property but including a calculated rent concerning the owner-occupied
property based on a calculated market rent of DKK 36m. (DKK 38m in 2014)
259
-241
18
-15,063
1,500
-13,563
2,061
-288
-11,790
414
-354
60
-13,376
726
-12,650
268
405
-11,977
| Contents – Financial statements
62
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
6
Insurance operating costs, gross, classified by type
Commissions
Staff expenses
Other staff expenses
Office expenses, fees and headquarter expenses
IT operating and maintenance costs, software expenses
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses and write-downs
Other income
Total lease expenses amount to DKK 27m (DKK 26m in 2014)
Insurance operating costs and claims include the following
staff expenses:
Salaries and wages
Commission
Allocated share options and matching shares
Pension plans a)
Other social security costs
Payroll tax
a) In 2015 defined benefit plans were included with DKK 40m.
Remuneration for the Supervisory Board and Executive Management
is disclosed in note 28 'Related parties'.
2015
2014
-368
-1,680
-179
-364
-261
-102
234
-2,720
-2,108
-6
-5
-300
-4
-371
-2,794
-395
-1,463
-213
-459
-272
-108
221
-2,689
-2,098
-7
-3
143
-5
-351
-2,321
Average number of full-time employees during the year
(continuing business)
3,472
3,639
| Contents – Financial statements
63
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
6
Share option programmes
Spec. of outstanding options:
TOTAL NUMBERS a)
FAIR VALUE
2015
Group Executive
Management
Other
senior
employees
Other
employees
Total
Per option Total value
at time of at time of
allocation allocation
DKKm
DKK
Per option
at 31 Dec.
DKK
Total
value at
31 Dec.
DKKm
Allocation 2010-2011
Allocated in 2010-2011, 1 January
Exercised
Expired
113,450
-113,450
0
132,860
-120,775
0
20,590
-13,570
-3,335
266,900
-247,795
-3,335
15/14
15/14
15/14
Outstanding options from 2010-2011
allocation 31 Dec. 2015
Number of options exercisable
31 Dec. 2015
0
0
12,085
3,685
15,770
12,085
3,685
15,770
2014
Allocation 2009-2011
Allocated in 2009-2011, 1 January
Exercised
Expired
Outstanding options from 2009-2011
245,205
-131,755
0
739,950
-599,090
-1,600
164,260 1,149,415
-861,265
-130,420
-4,250
-2,650
19/15/14
19/15/14
19/15/14
allocation 31 Dec. 2014
113,450
132,860
20,590
266,900
Number of options exercisable
31 Dec. 2014
113,450
132,860
20,590
266,900
4
-4
0
0
18
-13
0
5
55/44
55/44
55/44
55/52
55/52
55/52
14
-13
0
1
50
-36
0
14
a) In May 2015 each share with a nominal value of DKK 25 was replaced by five new shares with a nominal value of DKK 5.
The share split does not change the Group's share capital. Comparative figures have been restated to reflect the change in trading unit.
Tryg did not allocate share options in 2015.
At 31 December 2015, the share option plan com-
prised 15,770 share options (266,900 share options
at 31 December 2014). Each share option entitles the
holder to acquire one existing share with a nominal
value of DKK 5 in Tryg A/S. The share option plan
entitles the holders to buy 0.01 % of the share capital
in Tryg A/S if all share options are exercised.
In 2015, the fair value of share options recognised
in the consolidated income statement amounted to
DKK 0m (DKK 0m in 2014). At 31 December 2015,
a total amount of DKK 78m was recognised for share
option programmes issued in 2006-2011. Fair values
at the time of allocation are based on the Black &
Scholes option pricing formula.
There are no resigned Group Executive Managers with
outstanding options at 31 December 2015. Risk-tak-
ers are included under ‘Other senior employees’.
The following assumptions were applied in calculating
the market value of outstanding share options at the
time of allocation: The expected volatility is based on
the average volatility of Tryg shares. The expected
term is 4 years, corresponding to the average exercise
period of 3 to 5 years.
The risk-free interest rate is based on a bullet loan
with the same term as the expected term of the
options at the time of allocation. The calculation is
based on the strike price as set out in the option
agreement and the average share price at the time
of allocation.
The dividend payout ratio is not included in the calcu-
lation as the strike price is reduced by dividends paid
in order to prevent option holders from being placed
at a disadvantage in connection with the company’s
dividend payments. The assumptions for calculating
the market value at the end of term are based on the
same principles as for the market value at the time of
allocation.
| Contents – Financial statements
64
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
6
Share option programmes (continued)
Spec. of outstanding options:
Year of allocation
Years of exercise
1 Jan. 2015
Allocation
Exercised
Cancelled
Expired
31 Dec. 2015
2010
2011
2013-2015
2014-2016
Outstanding options 31 December 2015
220,220
46,680
266,900
0
0
0
-216,885
-30,910
-247,795
-3,335
0
-3,335
0
0
0
0
15,770
15,770
The assumptions by calculating the market value at time of allocation
Year of allocation
Years of exercise
2010
2011
2013-2015
2014-2016
Average share
price at time
of allocation
DKK
64.01
59.17
Expected
Volatility
29.20%
30.00%
Expected
maturity
4 years
4 years
Risk-free
interest rate
2.70%
3.00%
Average term Average exercise
share price
31 Dec. 2015
to maturity
31 Dec. 2015
0.00
0.05
0.00
44.08
| Contents – Financial statements
65
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
6 Matching shares
TOTAL NUMBERS
FAIR VALUE
Group Executive
Management
Other senior
employees
Average per
matching share
at grant date
DKK
Total
Total value
Average per
at time of matching share
at 31 Dec.
allocation
DKK
DKKm
Total fair value
at 31 Dec.
DKKm
2015
Allocated in 2015
14,415
33,740
48,155
Matching shares allocated
in 2015 at 31.12.15
14,415
33,740
48,155
Allocated in 2011-2014
91,630
Cancelled
Exercised
0
-18,000
78,675
-5,780
-19,540
170,305
-5,780
-37,540
Matching shares allocated
in 2011-2014 at 31.12.15
Number of Matching shares
exercisable 31 Dec. 2015
73,630
53,355
126,985
6,895
5,500
12,395
2014
Allocated in 2014
17,355
30,055
47,410
Matching shares allocated
in 2014 at 31.12.14
17,355
30,055
47,410
Allocated in 2011-2013
74,275
Cancelled
0
61,840
-13,220
136,115
-13,220
Matching shares allocated
in 2011-2013 at 31.12.14
74,275
48,620
122,895
88
88
77
77
77
77
103
103
68
68
4
4
14
0
-3
10
5
5
9
0
9
137
137
137
137
137
137
138
138
138
138
138
7
7
23
-1
-5
17
1
1
19
-2
17
In 2011-2015, Tryg entered into an agreement on
matching shares for the Executive Management and
selected other senior employees as a consequence of
the Group’s remuneration policy. The Executive Man-
agement and selected risk-takers are allocated one
share in Tryg A/S for each share that the Executive
Management member or risk-taker acquires in Tryg
A/S at market rate for liquid cash at a contractually
agreed sum. The shares are reported at market value
and are accrued over the 4-year maturation period. In
2015, the reported fair value of matching shares for
the Group amounted to DKK 5m (DKK 3m in 2014).
At 31 December 2015, a total amount of DKK 12m
was recognised for matching shares.
| Contents – Financial statements
66
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
7
Interest and dividends
Interest income and dividends
Dividends
Interest income, cash at bank and in hand
Interest income, bonds
Interest income, other
Interest expenses
Interest expenses subordinate loan capital and credit institutions
Interest expenses, other
8
Value adjustments
Value adjustments concerning financial assets or liabilities
at fair value with value adjustment in the income statement:
Equity investments
Unit trust units
Share derivatives
Bonds
Interest derivatives
Other loans
Value adjustments concerning assets or liabilities
that cannot be attributed to IAS 39:
Investment property
Owner-occupied property
Discounting
Other statement of financial position items
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
9
Tax
Tax on accounting profit/loss
Difference between Danish and foreign tax rates
Tax adjustment, previous years
Adjustment of non-taxable income and costs
Change in valuation of tax assets
Change in tax rate
Other taxes
Effective tax rate
Tax on accounting profit/loss
Difference between Danish and foreign tax rates
Tax adjustment, previous years
Adjustment of non-taxable income and costs
Change in valuation of tax assets
Change in tax rate
10
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business
Gross premium income
Gross claims
Total insurance operating costs
Profit/loss before tax
Tax
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business
-548
-26
0
-15
129
65
0
-395
%
23.5
1.0
0.0
1.0
-5.5
-3.0
17.0
3
54
7
64
-15
49
-809
-58
-8
140
-24
6
-2
-755
%
24.5
1.5
0.5
-4.0
1.0
-0.5
23.0
-3
31
-14
14
-4
10
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business primarily relates to Marine Hull Insurance.
47
2
742
3
794
-89
-6
-95
699
13
57
14
-608
-42
0
-566
17
0
120
-64
73
-493
39
8
893
9
949
-90
-25
-115
834
-18
354
17
-129
596
2
822
23
-106
-741
-93
-917
-95
Exchange rate adjustments concerning financial assets or liabilities which cannot be stated at fair
value total DKK 58m (DKK -179m in 2014)
| Contents – Financial statements
67
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
11
Intangible assets
Trademarks
and customer
relations
Goodwill
Assets
under con-
Software a)
struction a)
DKKm
11
Intangible assets
Trademarks
and customer
relations
Goodwill
Assets
under con-
Software a)
struction a)
2015
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Transferred from assets
under construction
Additions for the year
Cost at 31 December
Amortisation and write-downs
Amortisation and write-downs
at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Amortisation for the year
Amortisation and write-downs
at 31 December
546
12
0
0
558
-4
0
0
-4
200
5
0
0
1,028
-9
127
7
205
1,153
290
0
-127
134
297
Total
2,064
8
0
141
2,213
-104
-3
-22
-880
8
-78
-92
0
0
-1,080
5
-100
-129
-950
-92
-1,175
2014
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Transferred from asset
under construction
Additions for the year
Disposals for the year
Cost at 31 December
Amortisation and write-downs
Amortisation and write-downs
at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Amortisation for the year
Reversed amortisation
Amortisation and write-downs
at 31 December
381
-23
0
188
0
546
0
0
-4
0
-4
171
-11
0
40
0
936
-14
86
28
-8
200
1,028
-89
5
-20
0
-819
12
-82
9
270
-1
-86
107
0
290
-92
0
0
0
Total
1,758
-49
0
363
-8
2,064
-1,000
17
-106
9
-104
-880
-92
-1,080
Carrying amount at 31 December
554
76
203
205
1,038
Carrying amount at 31 December
542
96
148
198
984
a) Hereof proprietary software DKK 317m (DKK 245m at 31 December 2014)
| Contents – Financial statements
68
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
11 Intangible assets (continued)
Impairment test
Goodwill
In 2014, Tryg acquired Securator A/S, Optimal Djurförsäkring i Norr AB and Codan's agricultural portfolio. The
insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's business structure and merged into Tryg in 2015.
At 31 December 2015, management performed an impairment test of the carrying amount of goodwill based
on the allocation of the cost of goodwill to the cash-generating unit, which consists of Moderna and Securator,
respectively.
The Value-in-use method is used.
Primary assumptions for impairment test:
When assessing the cash flow management has based its estimates of premiums earned on the insurance
portfolio adjusted to reflect the expected effect of business decisions and market development from past ex-
periences. The portfolio is indexed with the wage and salary index. Claims incurred are based on expected
claims ratios, which corresponds to current levels. Moderna is adjusted for weather and large-scale claims as
well. Reinsurance is taken into account when looking at the overall technical result together with the expected
cost ratio. Required returns are based on management's own requirements for returns of the individual cash
generation units and are not expected to change significantly in the near future.
Moderna
Comprises the sale of insurance products to private customers under the ‘Moderna’ brand. Moreover,
insurance is sold under the brands Atlantica, Bilsport & MC and Moderna Djurförsäkringar. Sales take place
through its own sales force, call centres and online.
The cash flows appearing from the latest prognosis approved by management for the next 6 quarters are
used when calculating the value in use of Moderna. The cash flows in the latest budget period have been
extrapolated for financial years after the budget periods (terminal period) and adjusted for expected growth
rates determined on the basis of expectations for the general economic growth. The required return is based
on an assessment of the risk profile of the tested business activities compared with the market's expectations
for the Group.
The impairment test shows a calculated value in use of approximately DKK 1.3bn (1.4 bn) relative to a recog-
nised goodwill of DKK 368m (358m) and Equity of DKK 0.6bn (0.5bn) and does not indicate any impairment in
2015.
DKKm
2015
2014
- Earned premium assumed CAGR 0-10 years
- Earned premium assumed CAGR >10 years
- Required return before tax
- Expected level of Combined ratio
Sensitivity information
Impact on equity from the following changes:
CAGR +1.0 percentage point (0-10 years)
CAGR -1.0 percentage point (0-10 years)
Required return +1.0 percentage point
Required return -1.0 percentage point
Combined ratio +1.0 percentage point
Combined ratio -1.0 percentage point
2%
1%
13%
93%
25
-24
-161
189
-24
25
2%
1%
12%
93%
15
-12
-172
202
-27
27
Securator
In 2014, Tryg acquired Securator A/S. The insurance activities were incorporated into the Tryg Group's
business structure in 2014 and are reported under Sweden. In 2015, Securator was merged into Tryg
Forsikring A/S and is reported as part of the Swedish affinity portfolio. Securator is a Danish market leader
within the sale and brokering of multi-annual product insurance via dealers in the electronics and tele-
communications sector and supermarket chains.
The cash flows appearing from the latest prognosis approved by management for the next 6 quarters are
used when calculating the value in use of Securator. The cash flows in the latest budget period have been
extrapolated for financial years after the budget periods (terminal period) and adjusted for expected growth
rates determined on the basis of expectations for the general economic growth. The required return is based
on an assessment of the risk profile of the tested business activities compared with the market's expectations
for the Group.
The impairment test shows a calculated value in use of approximately DKK 184m (238m)relative to a recog-
nised Goodwill of DKK 184m (184m) and equity of DKK 174m (174m) and does not indicate any impairment
in 2015.
| Contents – Financial statements
69
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
- Earned premium assumed CAGR 0-10 years
- Earned premium assumed CAGR >10 years
- Required return before tax
- Expected level of Combined ratio
Sensitivity information
Impact on equity from the following changes:
CAGR +1.0 percentage point (0-10 years)
CAGR -1.0 percentage point (0-10 years)
Required return +1.0 percentage point
Required return -1.0 percentage point
Combined ratio +1.0 percentage point
Combined ratio -1.0 percentage point
13%
3%
11%
83-91%
12%
3%
11%
79-91 %
6
-5
-35
48
-16
17
9
-9
-49
70
-18
18
Software and assets under construction
As at 31 December 2015, management performed a test of the carrying amounts of software and assets
under construction.
The impairment test compares the carrying amount with the estimated present value of future cash flows.
The test did not indicate any impairment. Assets under construction are not depreciated but tested once a
year for impairment or when there is any indication of a decrease in value. Software with a limited useful life-
time is amortised over 4 years using the straight-line method. Amortised software is assessed for impairment
at the balance sheet date or when there are indications that the future cash flow cannot justify the carrying
amount. In the event that the recoverable amount is lower than the carrying amount, the difference is recog-
nised in the income statement. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less sales costs and value
in use.
A decline in the growth rate of more than 1% per cent will result in a write-down of the goodwill associated
with Securator. We do not expect a decline in the growth rate due to an expected expansion of the Securator
business to Norway and Sweden.
Correction
During a partial supervisory review the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA) has found that the
consolidated financial statements for 2014 for Tryg A/S were insufficient as these statements do not provide
sufficient information on goodwill and the impairment test made for this purpose. It has no effect on profit for
the year, total assets, liabilities or shareholders' equity in the 2014 Annual Report nor in the 2015 interim and
annual reports. The lack of information required in accordance with IAS 36, Impairment of assets, covers all
primary assumptions to which the calculation of the future cash flow is most sensitive, the method used to set
these assumptions and information on the growth rate used in the terminal period. On the basis of the DFSA's
partial supervisory review, Tryg has chosen to include the required information for 2015 and 2014 in the note
on intangible asset, including goodwill, in the 2015 Annual Report.
Trademarks and customer relations
As at 31 December 2015, management performed a test of the carrying amounts of trademarks and
customer relations as an integral part of the Moderna goodwill test. The impairment test of the acquired
agricultural portfolio is based on renewal and retention rates, which are on the expected level.
The test did not indicate any impairment.
| Contents – Financial statements
70
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
12
Property, plant and equipment
DKKm
2015
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Transferred from assets under construction
Additions for the year
Disposals for the year
Cost at 31 December
Operating equipment
Owner-occupied
property
Assets under
construction
241
-2
0
0
-4
235
-144
1
-34
0
4
-173
62
237
-5
9
241
-115
2
-31
0
0
-144
97
1,711
-22
11
15
0
1,715
-558
-3
-14
4
0
-571
1,144
1,738
-29
2
1,711
-434
-5
-15
-106
2
-558
1,153
94
-2
-11
2
0
83
-83
2
0
0
0
-81
2
85
-2
11
94
-85
2
0
0
0
-83
11
2015
6.8
6.5
6.7
External experts were involved in valuing the
owner-occupied properties.
Impairment test
Property, plant and equipment
A valuation of the owner-occupied property has
been carried out, including the improvements made,
and a revaluation of DKK 4m relating to the domicile
in Bergen was subsequently included in other com-
prehensive income (DKK 2m in 2014). The value of
the domicile in Ballerup was not changed in 2015
(DKK -106m in 2014). The impairment test performed
for operating equipment did not indicate any im-
pairment.
In determining the fair value of the properties,
not only publicly available market data are included,
corresponding to the ‘non-observable input’ in the fair
value hierarchy. No reclassifications have been made
between this category and other categories in the fair
value hierarchy during the year.
Total
2,046
-26
0
17
-4
2,033
-785
0
-48
4
4
-825
1,208
2,060
-36
22
2,046
-634
-1
-46
-106
2
-785
1,261
2014
6.8
6.5
6.7
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Depreciation for the year
Value adjustments for the year at revalued amount in other comprehensive income
Reversed depreciation
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 31 December
Carrying amount at 31 December
2014
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Additions for the year
Cost at 31 December
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Depreciation for the year
Value adjustments for the year at revalued amount in income statement
Value adjustments for the year at revalued amount in other comprehensive income
Accumulated depreciation and value adjustments at 31 December
Carrying amount at 31 December
The following return percentages have been applied:
Return percentages
Klausdalsbrovej 601, Ballerup
Folke Bernadottesvei 50, Bergen
Office property, weighted average
| Contents – Financial statements
71
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
12
Property, plant and equipment (continued)
Sensitivity
Tryg’s property valuations are based on the market-based rental income and operating expenses
of the individual property relative to the required rate of return. The most important factors
impacting the valuations are the applied rates of return, annual net rental income and occupancy
rates. The average rates of return applied are stated above.
Impacts on the fair value of properties
Increase in applied rate of return of 0.25%
Decrease in applied rate of return of 0.25%
Decrease in net rental income of 3%
Decrease in occupancy rate of 3%
13
Investment property
Fair value at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Additions for the year
Disposals for the year
Value adjustments for the year
Reversed on sale
Fair value at 31 December
2015
-41
45
-35
-8
1,828
-19
31
-17
8
7
1,838
2014
-46
42
-36
-8
1,831
-30
12
-7
23
-1
1,828
Total rental income for 2015 is DKK 120m (DKK 124m in 2014).
Total expenses for 2015 are DKK 31m (DKK 30m in 2014). Of this amount, expenses for non-let
property total DKK 0m (DKK 4m in 2014), total expenses for the income-generating investment
property are DKK 31m (DKK 26m in 2014).
External experts were involved in valuing the majority of the investment property.
In determining the fair value of the properties, not only publicly available market data are included,
corresponding to the ‘non-observable input’ in the fair value hierarchy. No reclassifications have been
made between this category and other categories in the fair value hierarchy during the year.
| Contents – Financial statements
13
Investment property (continued)
The following return percentages were used for each property category:
Return percentages, weighted average
Business property
Office property
Residential property
Total
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.5
Sensitivity
Tryg’s property valuations are based on the market-based rental income and operating expenses
of the individual property relative to the required rate of return. The most important factors
impacting the valuations are the applied rates of return, annual net rental income and occupancy
rates. The average rates of return applied are stated above.
Impacts on the fair value of properties
Increase in applied rate of return of 0.25%
Decrease in applied rate of return of 0.25%
Decrease in net rental income of 3%
Decrease in occupancy rate of 3%
14
Equity investments in associates
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Cost at 31 December
Revaluations at net asset value
Revaluations at net asset value
Revaluations at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Dividend received, this year
Reversed on sale
Value adjustments for the year
Revaluations at 31 December
Carrying amount at 31 December
2015
-77
82
-50
-9
201
201
24
-2
-32
-4
42
28
229
2014
-81
85
-61
-11
201
201
14
-1
0
-1
12
24
225
72
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
14
Equity investments in associates (continued)
Shares in associates according to the latest annual report:
Name and registered office
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Revenue
Profit/loss
for the year
Ownership
share in %
2015
Komplementarselskabet af 1. marts 2006 ApS, Denmark
Ejendomsselskabet af 1. marts 2006 P/S, Denmark
AS Eidsvåg Fabrikker, Norway
0
1,107
47
2014
Komplementarselskabet af 1. marts 2006 ApS, Denmark
Ejendomsselskabet af 1. marts 2006 P/S, Denmark
AS Eidsvåg Fabrikker, Norway
0
936
44
0
248
7
0
240
6
0
859
40
0
696
39
0
60
16
0
47
15
0
150
5
0
36
3
50
25
28
50
30
28
Individual estimates are made of the degree of
influence under the contracts made.
| Contents – Financial statements
73
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2015
2014
DKKm
15
Financial assets (Continued)
Fair value hierarchy for financial instruments measured at fair value in the statement of financial position
40,220
43,030
DKKm
15
Financial assets
Financial assets at fair value with value adjustments in
the income statement
Derivative financial instruments at fair value used for hedge
accounting with value adjustment in other comprehensive income
Receivables measured at amortised cost with value adjustment
in the income statement
Total financial assets
55
2,920
43,195
Financial assets at amortised cost only deviate to a minor extent from fair value.
Financial liabilities
Derivative financial instruments at fair value with value
adjustments in the income statement
Derivative financial instruments at fair value with value
adjustments in other comprehensive income
Financial liabilities at amortised cost with value adjustment
in the income statement
Total financial liabilities
598
14
8,127
8,739
142
2,167
45,339
799
0
7,121
7,920
2015
Equity investments
Unit trust units
Bonds
Derivative financial instruments, assets
Derivative financial instruments, debt
2014
Equity investments
Unit trust units
Bonds
Deposits with credit institutions
Derivative financial instruments, assets
Derivative financial instruments, debt
Qouted Observable
input
market price
Non-
observable
input
0
3,589
18,254
0
0
21,843
0
3,884
22,259
667
0
0
26,810
0
0
17,450
843
-612
17,681
0
0
14,915
0
1,318
-799
15,434
138
0
1
0
0
139
128
0
1
0
0
0
129
Information on valuation of subordinate loan capital at fair value is stated in note 1.
Other financial liabilities measured at amortised cost only deviate to a minor extent from fair value.
Financial instruments measured at fair value in the statement of financial
position on the basis of non-observable input:
2015
Carrying amount at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Gains/losses in the income statement
Purchases
Sales
Transfers to/from the group 'non-observable input'
Carrying amount at 31 December
Gains/losses in the income statement for assets held at the statement
of financial position date recognised in value adjustments
129
-1
3
11
-3
0
139
2
Bonds measured on the basis of observable inputs consist of Norwegian bonds issued by banks and
to some extent Danish semi-liquid bonds, where no quoted prices based on actual trades are available.
No significant reclassifications have been made between the categories 'Quoted prices' and 'Observable
input' in 2015. Inflation derivatives are measured at fair value on the basis of non-observable input
and are included under claims provisions at a fair value of DKK -417m (DKK -438m in 2014).
| Contents – Financial statements
74
Total
138
3,589
35,705
843
-612
39,663
128
3,884
37,175
667
1,318
-799
42,373
2014
150
-4
-18
8
-8
1
129
-18
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
15
Financial assets (continued)
Sensitivity information
Impact on equity from the following changes:
Interest rate increase of 0.7-1.0 percentage point
Interest rate fall of 0.7-1.0 percentage point
Equity price fall of 12 %
Fall in property prices of 8 %
Exchange rate risk (VaR 99)
Loss on counterparties of 8 %
2015
2014
DKKm
-153
-161
-297
-239
-14
-372
34
-95
-371
-239
-11
-399
The impact on the income statement is similar to the impact on equity. The statement complies
with the disclosure requirements set out in the Executive Order on Financial Reports for Insurance
Companies and Multi-Employer Occupational Pension Funds issued by the Danish FSA.
Derivative financial instruments
Derivatives with value adjustments in the income statement at fair value:
Interest derivatives
Share derivatives
Exchange rate derivatives
Derivatives according to statement
of financial position
Inflation derivatives, recognised
in claims provisions
Total derivative financial instruments
Due after less than 1 year
Due within 1 to 5 years
Due after more than 5 years
2015
2014
Fair value
in statement
of financial
position
283
0
-52
Nominal
27,415
47
8
Nominal
25,882
477
7,790
27,470
231
34,149
5,366
32,836
9,210
10,638
12,988
-417
-186
-56
-106
-24
3,221
37,370
16,592
11,121
9,657
Fair value
in statement
of financial
position
434
0
85
519
-438
81
86
-70
65
Derivatives, repos and reverses are used continuously as part of the cash and risk management
carried out by Tryg and its portfolio managers.
15
Financial assets (continued)
Derivative financial instruments used in connection with
hedging of foreign entities for accounting purposes
Gains and losses on hedges charged to other comprehensive income:
2015
Gains and losses at 1 January
Value adjustments for the year
Gains and losses at 31 December
2014
Gains and losses at 1 January
Value adjustments for the year
Gains and losses at 31 December
Gains
2,152
344
2,496
Gains
1,787
365
2,152
Losses
-2,162
-258
-2,420
Losses
-1,988
-174
-2,162
Net
-10
86
76
Net
-201
191
-10
Value adjustments
Value adjustments of foreign entities recognised in other comprehensive income in the amount of:
Value adjustments at 1 January
Value adjustment for the year
Value adjustments at 31 December
2015
23
-89
-66
2014
201
-178
23
| Contents – Financial statements
75
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
15
Financial assets (continued)
Receivables
Total receivables in connection with direct insurance contracts
Receivables from insurance enterprises
Unsettled transactions
Reverse repos
Other receivables
Specification of write-downs on receivables from insurance contracts:
Write-downs at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Write-downs and reversed write-downs for the year
Write-downs at 31 December
1,261
199
120
370
381
2,331
107
-3
12
116
1,232
208
0
0
222
1,662
112
-4
-1
107
Receivables are written down in full when submitted for debt collection. The write-down is reversed if
payment is subsequently received from debt collection and amounts to DKK 53m (DKK 54m in 2014).
Receivables in connection with insurance contracts include overdue receivables totalling:
Falling due:
Within 90 days
After 90 days
116
135
Other receivables do not contain overdue receivables
16
Reinsurer's share
Reinsurers' share
Write-downs after impairment test
251
3,179
-3
3,176
164
122
286
1,958
-20
1,938
17
Current tax
Net current tax at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Current tax for the year
Current tax on equity entries
Adjustment of current tax in respect of previous years
Tax paid for the year
Net current tax at 31 December
Current tax is recognised in the statement of financial position as follows:
Under assets, current tax
Under liabilities, current tax
-429
16
-495
-96
0
765
-239
118
-357
-239
-264
26
-632
-47
-24
512
-429
0
-429
-429
Net current tax
18
Equity
Number of shares
Number of shares of DKK 5 (1,000)
Number of shares at 1 January
Bought during the year
Cancellation in connection with
buyback programme
Used in connection with exercise of
incentive programme
Shares outstanding
2014
2015
289,120
-7,074
296,870
-8,963
Own shares
2015
9,358
7,074
2014
9,711
8,963
0
0
-8,919
-8,103
270
1,213
Number of shares at 31 December
282,316
289,120
Number of shares as a percentage of
issued shares at 31 December
Nominal value at 31 December (DKKm)
97.50
1,412
96.86
1,446
-270
7,243
2.50
36
-1,213
9,358
3.14
47
Impairment test
As at 31 December 2015, management performed a test of the carrying amount of total
reinsurers' share of provisions for insurance contracts and receivables. The impairment test
resulted in impairment charges totalling DKK 3m (DKK 20m in 2014). Write-downs for the
year include reversed write-downs totalling DKK 30m (DKK 0m in 2014). There is no overdue
reinsurers' share other than the share already provided for.
In May 2015 each share with a nominal value of DKK 25 was replaced by five new shares with
a nominal value of DKK 5. The share split did not change the Group's share capital. Comparative
figures have been restated to reflect the change in trading unit.
Pursuant to the authorisation granted by the shareholders, Tryg may acquire up to 10.0% of the share
capital in the period up until 25 March 2020. Own shares are acquired for use in the Group's incentive
programme and as part of the share buyback programme.
| Contents – Financial statements
76
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
18
Equity (continued)
Capital adequacy
Equity according to annual report
Proposed dividend
Solvency requirements of subsidiaries – 50%
Tier 1 Capital
Subordinate loan capital
Solvency requirements of subsidiaries – 50%
Capital base
Weighted assets
2015
2014
DKKm
19
9,831
-1,013
-3,868
4,950
1,707
-3,868
2,789
11,119
-1,731
-2,353
7,035
1,496
-2,353
6,178
2,571
7,122
Solvency ratio
(Solvency I – ratio between capital base and weighted assets)
108
87
The capital base and the solvency ratio are calculated in accordance
with the Danish Financial Business Act.
19
Premium provisions
Premium provision at 1 January
Adjustment regarding Norwegian Group life beginning of year
Value adjustments of provisions, beginning of year
Paid in the financial year
Change in premiums in the financial year
Exchange rate adjustments
Premium provisions at 31 December
Other a)
5,724
-124
-53
17,311
-17,416
-13
5,429
142
5,571
6,176
0
-202
17,692
-17,951
9
5,724
86
5,810
a) Comprises premium provisions for Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S and Securator A/S.
Gross
Ceded Net of reinsurance
Claims provisions
2015
Claims provisions at 1 January
Adjustment regarding Norwegian Group life
beginning of year
Value adjustments of provisions, beginning of year
24,601
124
-464
24,261
Paid in the financial year in respect of the current year
Paid in the financial year in respect of prior years
-6,676
-6,011
Change in claims in the financial year
in respect of the current year
Change in claims in the financial year
in respect of prior years
Discounting and exchange rate adjustments
Claims provisions at 31 December
Other a)
2014
Claims provisions at 1 January
Value adjustments of provisions, beginning of year
-12,687
14,606
-1,232
13,374
124
25,072
355
25,427
25,271
-839
24,432
Paid in the financial year in respect of the current year
Paid in the financial year in respect of prior years
-6,215
-6,917
Change in claims in the financial year in respect
of the current year
Change in claims in the financial year in respect
of prior years
Discounting and exchange rate adjustment
Claims provisions at 31 December
Other a)
-13,132
12,835
-638
12,197
1,104
24,601
671
25,272
a) Comprises claims provisions for Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S.
-1,272
23,329
0
32
-1,240
37
414
451
-2,021
15
-2,006
-57
-2,852
-151
-3,003
-1,780
58
-1,722
90
1,143
1,233
-251
-481
-732
-51
-1,272
-447
-1,719
124
-432
23,021
-6,639
-5,597
-12,236
12,585
-1,217
11,368
67
22,220
204
22,424
23,491
-781
22,710
-6,125
-5,774
-11,899
12,584
-1,119
11,465
1,053
23,329
224
23,553
| Contents – Financial statements
77
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
20
Pensions and similar obligations
Jubilees
Recognised liability
50
50
Defined-benefit pension plans:
Present value of pension obligations funded through operations
62
Present value of pension obligations funded through establishment of funds 1,130
Pension obligation, gross
Fair value of plan assets
Pension obligation, net
Specification of change in recognised pension obligations:
Recognised pension obligation at 1 January
Adjustment regarding plan changes not recognised in
the income statement and expected estimate deviation a)
Exchange rate adjustments
Present value of pensions earned during the year
Capital cost of previously earned pensions
Acturial gains/losses
Paid during the period
Recognised pension obligation at 31 December
Change in carrying amount of plan assets:
Carrying amount of plan assets at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Investments in the year
Estimated return on pension funds
Acturial gains/losses
Paid during the period
Carrying amount of plan assets at 31 December
Total pensions and similar obligations at 31 December
Total recognised obligation at 31 December
1,192
978
214
1,290
-10
-74
35
29
-23
-55
1,192
1,010
-58
91
25
-49
-41
978
214
264
20
Pensions and similar obligations (continued)
Specification of pension cost for the year:
Present value of pensions earned during the year
Interest expense on accrued pension obligation
Expected return on plan assets
Accrued employer contributions
Effect associated with change in agreement
Total year's cost of defined-benefit plans
The premium for the following financial years is estimated at:
Number of active persons
Number of pensioners
Average expected remaining service time (years)
Estimated distribution of plan assets:
Shares
Bonds
Property
Other
Average return on plan assets
Weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation
Assumptions used
Discount rate
Estimated return on pension funds
Salary adjustments
Pension adjustments
G adjustments
Turnover
Employer contributions
Mortality table
62
62
63
1,227
1,290
1,010
280
1,756
-421
-123
41
38
58
-59
1,290
1,033
-72
57
32
4
-44
1,010
280
342
31
30
-26
5
0
40
53
595
586
7.81
%
10
73
15
2
2.6
18
1.9
1.9
2.5
0.0
2.3
7.0
14.1
K2013
38
39
-33
6
-421
-371
53
714
575
8.09
%
10
73
15
2
2.7
18
2.1
2.1
3.3
0.1
3.0
7.0
14.1
K2013
a) The change of the pension scheme in Norway is carried out in the same way as has been done for
other major financial companies in Norway and causes a reduction in the provision.
| Contents – Financial statements
78
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
20
2015
2014
DKKm
Pensions and similar obligations (continued)
Sensitivity information
The sensitivity analysis is based on a change in one of the assumptions, assuming that all other as-
sumptions remain constant. In reality, this is rarely the case, and changes to some assumptions may
be subject to covariance. The sensitivity analysis has been carried out using the same method as the
actuarial calculation of the pension provisions in the statement of financial position.
Impact on equity from the following changes:
Interest rate increase of 0.3 percentage point
Interest rate decrease of 0.3 percentage point
Pay increase rate, increase of 1 percentage point
Pay increase rate, decrease of 1 percentage point
Turnover, increase of 2 percentage point
Turnover, decrease of 2 percentage point
46
-49
-99
83
25
-29
27
-30
-55
45
49
-61
Description of the Norwegian plan
In the Norwegian part of the Group, about half of the employees have a defined-benefit pension plan.
The plans are based on the employees' expected final pay, providing the members of the plan with
a guaranteed level of pension benefits throughout their lives. The pension benefits are determined
by the employees' term of employment and salary at the time of retiring. Employees having made
contributions for a full period of contribution are guaranteed a pension corresponding to 66% of their
final pay. As of 2014, pensions being disbursed are no longer regulated in step with the basic amount
of old-age pension paid in Norway (G regulation), but are subject to a minimum regulation.
Under the present defined-benefit plan, members earn a free policy entitlement comprising disability
cover, spouse and cohabitant cover and children's pension.
The pension funds are managed by Nordea Liv & Pension and regulated by local legislation and practice.
20
Pensions and similar obligations (continued)
Description of the Swedish plan
Moderna Försäkringar, a branch of Tryg Forsikring A/S, complies with the Swedish industry pension
agreement, the FTP plan, which is insured with Försäkringsbranschens Pensionskassa – FPK.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Group’s Swedish branch has undertaken, along with the other
businesses in the collaboration, to pay the pensions of the individual employees in accordance with
the applicable rules.
The FTP plan is primarily a defined-benefit plan in terms of the future pension benefits. FPK is unable
to provide sufficient information for the Group to use defined-benefit accounting. For this reason, the
Group has accounted for the plan as if it were a defined-contribution plan in accordance with IAS 19.30.
This years premium paid to FPK amounted to DKK 18m, which is about 4 % of the annual premium
in FPK (2014). FPK writes in its interim report for 2015 that it had a collective consolidation ratio of
114 at 30 June 2015 (consolidation ratio of 110 at 30 June 2014). The collective consolidation ratio
is defined as the fair value of the plan assets relative to the total collective pension obligations.
| Contents – Financial statements
79
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
DKKm
21
Deferred tax
Tax asset
Operating equipment
Debt and provisions
Capitalised tax loss
Tax liability
Intangible rights
Land and buildings
Bonds
Contingency funds
Deferred tax
Unaccrued timing differences of statement of financial position items
Development in deferred tax
Deferred tax at 1 January
Exchange rate adjustments
Change in deferred tax relating to change in tax rate
Change in deferred tax previous years
Change in capitalised tax loss
Change in deferred tax taken to the income statement
Change in valuation of tax asset
Change in deferred tax taken to equity
Deferred tax at 31 December
Tax value of non-capitalised tax loss
Denmark
Sweden
8
35
1
44
77
96
-40
612
745
701
20
1,022
-116
13
0
0
-58
-128
-32
701
16
0
11
60
1
72
77
229
3
785
1,094
1,022
146
1,057
-62
-6
-16
6
22
24
-3
1,022
18
2
The loss in Tryg A/S cannot be utilised in the Danish joint taxation scheme. The loss can be carried
forward indefinitely. Loss determined according to Swedish rules can be carried forward indefinitely.
The losses are not recognised as tax assets until it has been substantiated that the company can gen-
erate sufficient future taxable income to offset the tax loss. The total current and deferred tax relating
to items recognised in equity is recognised in the statement of financial position in the amount of
DKK 32m (DKK14m at 31 December 2014).
| Contents – Financial statements
22
Other provisions
Other provisions at 1 January
Change in provisions
Other provisions 31 December
83
49
132
73
10
83
Other provisions relate to provisions for the Group’s own insurance claims and restructuring costs.
Additions to the provision for restructuring costs during the year amounts to DKK 120m and reas-
sessment of the beginning of year balance amounts to DKK -69m. The balance as at 31 December
2015 amounts to DKK 130m (DKK79m at 31 December 2014).
23
Amounts owed to credit institutions
Overdraft facilities
24
Debt relating to unsettled funds transactions and repos
Unsettled fund transactions
Repo debt
Unsettled fund transactions include debt for bonds purchased in 2014
and 2015; however, with settlement in 2015 and 2016, respectively.
25
Earnings per share
Profit/loss from continuing business
Profit/loss on discontinued and divested business
Profit/loss for the year
Average number of shares (1,000)
Diluted number of shares (1,000)
Diluted average number of shares (1,000)
Earnings per share, continuing business
Diluted earnings per share, continuing business
Earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Earnings per share, discontinued and divested business
Diluted earnings per share, discontinued and divested business
64
64
290
3,784
4,074
1,932
49
1,981
285,073
28
285,101
6.77
6.77
6.95
6.95
0.18
0.18
116
116
885
2,017
2,902
2,547
10
2,557
292,521
267
292,788
8.70
8.70
8.74
8.73
0.04
0.03
80
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
DKKm
2015
2014
26
Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities
Contractual obligations
2015
<1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
> 5 years
Total
Obligations due by period
Operating leases
Other contractual obligations
2014
Operating leases
Other contractual obligations
66
282
348
62
410
472
110
103
213
101
83
184
76
0
76
71
0
71
56
0
56
67
0
67
308
385
693
301
493
794
In august 2015 Tryg and Skandia have signed an agreement whereby Tryg will acquire Skandia’s
activities within child and adult accident insurance and integrate them into its Swedish business,
Moderna Forsäkringar. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and the parties expect
it to be completed in second half 2016. Hereafter Tryg will take over the control of the portfolios.
The acquisition has no effect on the financial statement for 2015.
Tryg has signed the following contracts with amounts above DKK 50m:
Outsourcing agreement with TCS for DKK 156m for a 4 year period, which expires in 2017.
Lease contracts on premises for DKK 265m. The contracts expire after 5 years.
26 Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities (continued)
Collateral
The Danish companies in the Tryg Group are jointly taxed with TryghedsGruppen smba. The companies
and the other jointly taxed companies are liable for any obligations to withhold taxes at source on inter-
est, royalties, dividends and income taxes etc. in respect of the jointly taxed companies.
Tryg Forsikring A/S and Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S have
registered the following assets as having been held as security for the insurance provisions:
Equity investments in associates
Equity investments
Unit trust units
Bonds
Deposits with credit institutions
Receivables relating to reinsurance
Interest and rent receivable
Equity investments in and receivables from Group undertakings
which have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements
14
138
3,589
32,121
0
0
281
2,706
Total
38,849
15
128
3,884
34,273
667
439
337
1,730
41,473
| Contents – Financial statements
81
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
D
Notes
DKKm
26
Contractual obligations, collateral and contingent liabilities (continued)
Offsetting and collateral in relation to financial assets and obligations
Gross amount
before offsetting
According to the
statement of
financial position
Offsetting
Bonds as colla-
teral for repos/
reverse repos
Collateral
in cash
Net amount
Collateral which is not offset in
the statement of financial position
2015
Assets
Reverse repos
Derivative financial instruments
Liabilities
Repo debt
Derivative financial instruments
Inflation derivatives, recognised in claims provisions
2014
Assets
Derivative financial instruments
Liabilities
Repo debt
Derivative financial instruments
Inflation derivatives, recognised in claims provisions
370
843
1,213
3,784
612
417
4,813
1,318
1,318
2,017
799
438
3,254
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
370
843
1,213
3,784
612
417
4,813
1,318
1,318
2,017
799
438
3,254
-370
0
-370
-3,784
0
0
-3,784
0
0
-2,017
0
0
-2,017
0
-940
-940
-1
-641
-421
-1,063
-1,324
-1,324
-1
-767
-448
-1,216
0
-97
-97
-1
-29
-4
-34
-6
-6
-1
32
-10
21
Contingent liabilities
Companies in the Tryg Group are party to a number
of disputes in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Management believes that the outcome of these
disputes will not affect the Group's financial position
significantly beyond the obligations recognized in the
statement of financial position at 31 December 2015.
| Contents – Financial statements
82
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
27
2015
DKKm
2015
2014
Acquisition of subsidiaries
2015
In august 2015 Tryg and Skandia have signed an agreement whereby Tryg will acquire Skandia’s
activities within child and adult accident insurance. See note 26 for further information.
2014
In 2014 the Tryg Group has taken control of Securator A/S and of Optimal Djurförsäkring i Norr AB by
acquiring all shares in the companies. Securator A/S is a Danish market leader within the sale and
brokering of multi-annual product insurance via dealers in the electronics and telecommunications
sector and supermarket chains. The acquisition is expected to increase Tryg's market share within
product insurance by providing access to Securator A/S's customer portfolio and distribution chan-
nels. Optimal Djurförsäkring i Norr AB is a Swedish market leader within the sale of pet insurance.
Tryg also expects to realise cost savings through synergies.
Net assets acquired
Intangible assets
Equipment
Receivables, other assets and accrued income
Provisions for insurance contracts
Debt and accruals and deferred income
Net assets acquired
Goodwill
Purchase price
hereof cash
Purchase price in cash
2014
0
1
65
-37
-40
-11
188
177
14
163
The Group has not incurred any significant acquisition costs in connection with the acquisition. The
purchase price is final. In connection with the acquisitions, a sum was paid which exceeds the fair
value of the identifiable acquired assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. This positive balance is
mainly attributable to expected synergies between the activities in the acquired enterprises and the
Group’s existing activities, future growth opportunities as well as the staff of the acquired enterprises.
These synergies have not been recognised separately from goodwill as they are not separately identi-
fiable. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The enterprises are included in premium income and in the results for the year with an insignificant
amount due to the short ownership period and the Management believes that these pro forma fig-
ures reflect the Group’s earnings level after the acquisition of the enterprises and that the amounts
may therefore form the basis for comparisons in subsequent financial years.
| Contents – Financial statements
27
Acquisition of subsidiaries (continued)
The determination of the pro forma amounts for premium income and profit for the period is based
on the following significant assumptions:
• Premiums and claims have been calculated on the basis of the fair values determined in the
pre-acquisition balance sheets for premium and claims provisions, rather than the original carrying
amounts.
• Other costs, including depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortisation of intangible
assets, have been calculated on the basis of the fair values determined in the pre-acquisition balance
sheets, rather than the original carrying amounts.
28
Related parties
The group has no related parties with a decisive influence other than the parent company, Trygheds-
Gruppen smba and the subsidiaries of TryghedsGruppen smba (other related parties). Related parties
with significant influence include the Supervisory Board, the Executive Management and their
members’ family.
Premium income
- Parent company (TryghedsGruppen smba)
- Key management
- Other related parties
Claims payments
- Parent company (TryghedsGruppen smba)
- Key management
- Other related parties
0.3
0.3
1.9
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.3
0.3
2.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
83
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
DKKm
28
DKKm
28
Related parties (continued)
Specification of remuneration
2015
Supervisory Board
Executive Management
Risk-takers
a) Exclusive of severance pay
Of which retired:
Supervisory Board
Risk-takers
Number of
persons
Basis
salary
Variable
salary
Pension
Total a)
13
3
8
24
6
21
19
46
0
2
1
3
0
5
5
10
6
28
25
59
Number
of persons
Severance
pay
1
3
4
0
14
14
The maximum amount paid in severance pay to an individual is DKK 7m.
2014
Supervisory Board
Executive Management
Risk-takers
a) Exclusive of severance pay
Of which retired:
Risk-takers
Number of
persons
Basis
salary
Variable
salary
Pension
Total a)
12
3
10
25
7
19
22
48
0
2
1
3
0
4
5
9
7
25
28
60
Number
of persons
Severance
pay
2
2
0
0
There has not been paid any severance pay of more than DKK 1m.
Fees are charges incurred during the financial year. Variable salary includes the charges for matching
shares, which are recognised over 4 years and share options, which are recognised over 3 years.
Reference is made to section 'Corporate governance' of the management's review on the corresponding
disbursements. The Executive Management and risk-takers are included in incentive programmes.
Please refer to note 6 for information concerning this.
.
Related parties (continued)
The members of the Supervisory Board in Tryg A/S are paid with a fixed remuneration and are not
covered by the incentive schemes.
The Executive Management is paid a fixed remuneration and pension. The variable salary is awarded
in the form of a matching share programme, see 'Corporate governance'. Besides this, the directors
have free car appropriate to their position as well as other market conformal employee benefits
Each member of the Executive Management is entitled to 12 months' notice and severance pay equal
to 12 months’ salary plus pension contribution (Group CEO is entitled to severance pay equal to 18
months' salary). Members of the Executive Management can assert no further claims in this respect,
for example claims for compensation pursuant to Sections 2a and/or 2b of the Danish Salaried Em-
ployees Act, as such claims are regarded as being included in the severance pay.
Risk-takers are defined as employees whose activities have a significant influence on the company’s
risk profile.
The Supervisory Board decides which employees should be considered to be risk-takers.
Parent company
Tryghedsgruppen smba
TryghedsGruppen smba controls 60% of the shares in Tryg A/S.
.
Intra-group trading involved::
- Providing and receiving services
2015
0
2014
1
Transactions between TryghedsGruppen smba and Tryg A/S are conducted on an arm's length basis.
Intra-group transactions:
Administration fee, etc. is fixed on a cost-recovery basis. Intra-group accounts are offset and carry in-
terest on market terms.
The companies in the Tryg Group have entered into reinsurance contracts on market terms.
Transactions with Group undertakings have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements
in accordance with the accounting policies.
29
Financial highlights
Please refer to page 40.
| Contents – Financial statements
84
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
30 Accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared
in accordance with the International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as per adopted by the
EU on 31 December 2015 and in accordance with
the Danish Statutory Order on Adoption of IFRS.
The annual report of the parent company is prepared
in accordance with the executive order on financial
reports presented by insurance companies and lateral
pension funds issued by the Danish FSA. The deviations
from the recognition and measurement requirements
of IFRS are:
•
The Danish FSA’s executive order does not allow
provisions for deferred tax of contingency reserves
allocated from untaxed funds. Deferred tax and
the other comprehensive income of the parent
company have been adjusted accordingly on
the transition to IFRS.
The accounting policies have been applied consistently
with last year.
Correction
During a partial supervisory review the Danish Financial
Supervisory Authority (DFSA) has found that the con-
solidated financial statements for 2014 for Tryg A/S
were insufficient as these statements do not provide
sufficient information on goodwill and the impairment
test made for this purpose.
It has no effect on profit for the year, total assets,
liabilities or shareholders' equity in the 2014 Annual
Report nor in the 2015 interim and annual reports.
The lack of information required in accordance with
IAS 36, Impairment of assets, covers all primary as-
sumptions to which the calculation of the future cash
flow is most sensitive, the method used to set these
assumptions and information on the growth rate used
in the terminal period.
On the basis of the DFSA's partial supervisory review,
Tryg has chosen to include the required information
for 2015 and 2014 in the note on intangible asset,
including goodwill, in the 2015 Annual Report.
The new executive order will only have effect on
recognition and measurement in the Group’s financial
reporting in the following area.
Accounting regulation
Implementation of changes to accounting standards
and interpretation in 2015
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
has issued a number of changes to the international
accounting standards, and the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) has also
issued a number of interpretations. No standards or
interpretations have been implemented for the first
time for the accounting year that began on 1st January
2015 that will have a significant impact on the group.
Claims provisions
The executive order prescribes a change from
applying a yield curve issued by the Danish Financial
Supervisory Authority to applying a new yield curve
published by EIOPA – the new yield curve is expected
to be at a lower level. The change will amount to
approx. DKK 240m.
It is Tryg’s assessment that the amendments to the
Executive Order from 2016 can be accommodated
within IFRS, therefore it is not expected that there are
any major differences between the Parent Company
and the consolidated financial statements as a result
of the new accounting regulation.
There has not been implemented any new or
amended standards and interpretations that have
affected the group significantly.
Changes to accounting estimates
There have been no changes to the accounting
estimates in 2015.
Future orders, standards and interpretations that
the group has not implemented and which have still
not entered into force but could effect the group
significantly:
•
•
•
Executive order on financial reports presented by
insurance companies and lateral pension funds is-
sued by the Danish FSA1)
IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’2)
IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’2)
1)
enters into force for the accounting year
commencing 1 January 2016.
2) enters into force for the accounting year
commencing 1 January 2018 or later.
The changes will be implemented going forward from
the effective date
Significant accounting estimates and assessments
The preparation of financial statements under
IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting
estimates and requires management to exercise its
judgement in the process of applying the Group’s
accounting policies. The areas involving a higher
degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where
assumptions and estimates are significant to the
consolidated financial statements are:
• Liabilities under insurance contracts
• Valuation of defined benefit plans
• Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
• Valuation of property
•
Measurement of goodwill, Trademarks and
Customer relations
Liabilities under insurance contracts
Estimates of provisions for insurance contracts repre-
sent the Group’s most critical accounting estimates,
as these provisions involve a number of uncertainty
factors.
Claims provisions are estimated based on actuarial
and statistical projections of claims and the adminis-
tration of claims. The projections are based on Tryg’s
knowledge of historical developments, payment pat-
terns, reporting delays, duration of the claims settle-
ment process and other factors that might influence
future developments in the liabilities.
The Group makes claims provisions, in addition to
provisions for known claims, which cover estimated
compensation for losses that have been incurred, but
not yet reported to the Group (known as IBNR re-
serves) and future developments in claims which are
known to the Group but have not been finally settled.
Claims provisions also include direct and indirect
claims settlement costs or loss adjustment expenses
that arise from events that have occurred up to the
statement of financial position date even if they have
not yet been reported to Tryg.
The calculation of the claims provisions is therefore
inherently uncertain and, by necessity, relies upon the
making of certain assumptions as regards factors such
as court decisions, amendments to legislation, social
inflation and other economic trends, including inflation.
The Group’s actual liability for losses may therefore be
subject to material positive or negative deviations rela-
tive to the initially estimated claims provisions.
Claims provisions are discounted. As a result, initial
changes in discount rates or changes in the duration
of the claims provisions could have positive or nega-
tive effects on earnings. Discounting affects the
motor third-party liability, general third-party liability,
workers’ compensation classes, including sickness
and personal accident, in particular.
| Contents – Financial statements
85
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | The Financial Supervisory Authority’s adjusted
discount curve, which is based on euro swap rates,
national spreads and Danish swap rates, and also an
option-adjusted mortgage interest rate spread, is
used to discount Danish claims provisions.
The Norwegian and Swedish provisions are discounted
based on euro swap rates, to which a country-specific
interest rate spread is added that reflects the difference
between Norwegian and Swedish government bonds
and the interest rate on German government bonds.
Finnish provisions are discounted using the Danish
discount curve.
Several assumptions and estimates underlying the
calculation of the claims provisions are mutually d
ependent. This has the greatest impact on assump-
tions regarding interest rates and inflation.
Defined benefit pension schemes
The Group operates a defined-benefit plan in Norway.
A defined-benefit plan is a pension plan that defines
an amount of pension benefit that an employee will
receive on retirement, depending on age, years of
service and salary.
The net obligation with respect to the defined- benefit
plan is based on actuarial calculations involving a
number of assumptions. The assumptions include
discount interest rate, expected future salary and pen-
sion adjustments, turnover, mortality and disability.
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
Measurements of financial assets and liabilities for
which prices are quoted in an active market or which
are based on generally accepted models with observ-
able market data are not subject to material esti-
mates. For securities that are not listed on a stock ex-
change, or for which no stock exchange price is
quoted that reflects the fair value of the instrument,
the fair value is determined using a current OTC price
of a similar financial instrument or using a model cal-
culation. The valuation models include the discount-
ing of the instrument cash flow using an appropriate
market interest rate with due consideration for credit
and liquidity premiums.
Valuation of property
Property is divided into owner-occupied property and
investment property. Owner-occupied property is as-
sessed at the reassessed value that is equivalent to
the fair value at the time of reassessment, with a de-
duction for depreciation and write-downs. The fair
value is calculated based on a market-determined
rental income, as well as operating expenses in pro-
portion to the property’s required rate of return in per
cent. Investment property is recognised at fair value.
The calculation of fair value is based on market prices,
taking into consideration the type of property, loca-
tion and maintenance standard, and based on a mar-
ket- determined rental income as well as operating ex-
penses in proportion to the property’s required rate of
return. Cf. note 12 and 13.
Measurement of goodwill, Trademarks
and Customer relations
Goodwill, Trademarks and customer relations was ac-
quired in connection with acquisition of businesses.
Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units un-
der which management manages the investment. The
carrying amount is tested for impairment at least an-
nually. Impairment testing involves estimates of future
cash flows and is affected by a number of factors, in-
cluding discount rates and other circumstances de-
pendent on economic trends, such as customer be-
haviour and competition. Cf. note 11.
ognised in other comprehensive income, and revalua-
tion of investment property, financial assets held for
trading and financial assets and financial liabilities (in-
cluding derivative instruments) at fair value in the in-
come statement.
Assets are recognised in the statement of financial po-
sition when it is probable that future economic bene-
fits will flow to the Group, and the value of such assets
can be measured reliably. Liabilities are recognised in
the statement of financial position when the Group
has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a
prior event, and it is probable that future economic
benefits will flow out of the Group, and the value of
such liabilities can be measured reliably.
On initial recognition, assets and liabilities are meas-
ured at cost, with the exception of financial assets,
which are recognised at fair value. Measurement sub-
sequent to initial recognition is effected as described
below for each item. Anticipated risks and losses that
arise before the time of presentation of the annual re-
port and that confirm or invalidate affairs and condi-
tions existing at the statement of financial position
date are considered at recognition and measurement.
Income is recognised in the income statement as
earned, whereas costs are recognised by the amounts
attributable to this financial year. Value adjustments of
financial assets and liabilities are recognised in the in-
come statement unless otherwise described below.
All amounts in the notes are shown in millions of
DKK, unless otherwise stated.
Description of accounting policies
Consolidation
Recognition and measurement
The annual report has been prepared under the his-
torical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation
of owner-occupied property, where increases are rec-
Consolidated financial statements
The consolidated financial statements comprise the fi-
nancial statements of Tryg A/S (the parent company)
and the enterprises (subsidiaries) controlled by the
parent company. The parent company is regarded as
controlling an enterprise when it i) exercises a control-
ling influence over the relevant activities in the enter-
prise in question, ii) is exposed to or has the right to a
variable return on its investment, and iii) can exercise
its controlling influence to affect the variable return.
Enterprises in which the Group directly or indirectly
holds between 20% and 50% of the voting rights and
exercises significant influence but no controlling influ-
ence are classified as associates.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on
the basis of the financial statements of Tryg A/S and its
subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements
are prepared by combining items of a uniform nature.
The financial statements used for the consolidation
are prepared in accordance with the Group’s account-
ing policies.
On consolidation, intra-group income and costs, intra-
group accounts and dividends, and gains and losses
arising on transactions between the consolidated en-
terprises are eliminated.
Items of subsidiaries are fully recognised in the con-
solidated financial statements.
Business combinations
Newly acquired or newly established enterprises are
recognised in the consolidated financial statements
from the date of acquisition and the date of formation,
respectively. The date of acquisition is the date on
which control of the acquired enterprise actually
passes to Tryg. Divested or discontinued enterprises
are recognised in the consolidated statement of com-
prehensive income up to the date of disposal or the
settlement date. The date of disposal is the date
on which control of the divested enterprise actually
passes to a third party.
| Contents – Financial statements
86
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | The purchase method is applied for new acquisitions
if the Group gains control of the acquired enterprise.
Subsequently, identifiable assets, liabilities and con-
tingent liabilities in the acquired enterprises are meas-
ured at fair value at the date of acquisition. Non-cur-
rent assets which are acquired with the intention of
selling them are, however, measured at fair value less
expected selling costs. Restructuring costs are recog-
nised in the pre-acquisition balance sheet only if they
constitute an obligation for the acquired enterprise.
The tax effect of revaluations is taken into account.
The acquisition price of an enterprise consists of the
fair value of the price paid for the acquired
enterprise. If the final determination of the price is
conditional upon one or more future events, such
events are recognised at their fair values at the date of
acquisition. Costs relating to the acquisition are rec-
ognised in the income statement as incurred.
Any positive balances (goodwill) between the acquisi-
tion price of the acquired enterprise, the value of mi-
nority interests in the acquired enterprise and the fair
value of previously acquired equity investments, on
the one hand, and the fair value of the acquired as-
sets, liabilities and contingent liabilities, on the other
hand, are recognised as an asset under intangible as-
sets, and are tested for impairment at least once a
year. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its
recoverable amount, it is impaired to the lower recov-
erable amount.
In the event of negative balances (negative goodwill),
the calculated fair values, the calculated acquisition
price of the enterprise, the value of minority interests
in the acquired enterprise and the fair value of previ-
ously acquired equity investments are revalued. If the
balance is still negative, the amount is recognised as
income in the income statement.
If, at the date of acquisition, there is uncertainty as to
the identification or measurement of acquired assets,
liabilities or contingent liabilities or the determination
of the acquisition price, initial recognition is based on
a preliminary determination of values. The preliminar-
ily determined values may be adjusted or additional
assets or liabilities may be recognised up to 12
months after the acquisition, provided that new infor-
mation has come to light regarding matters existing at
the date of acquisition which would have affected the
determination of the values at the date of acquisition,
had such information been known.
As a general rule, subsequent changes in estimates of
conditional acquisition prices are recognised directly
in the income statement.
Currency translation
A functional currency is determined for each of the re-
porting entities in the Group. The functional currency
is the currency used in the primary economic environ-
ment in which the reporting entity operates. Transac-
tions in currencies other than the functional currency
are transactions in foreign currencies.
On initial recognition, transactions in foreign curren-
cies are translated into the functional currency using
the exchange rate applicable at the transaction date.
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign curren-
cies are translated using the exchange rates applica-
ble at the statement of financial position date. Trans-
lation differences are recognised in the income
statement under price adjustments.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the
Group’s foreign operations are translated using the
exchange rates applicable at the statement of finan-
cial position date. Income and expense items are
translated using the average exchange rates for the
period. Exchange rate differences arising on transla-
tion are classified as other comprehensive income
and transferred to the Group’s translation reserve.
Such translation differences are recognised as income
or as expenses in the period in which the activities are
divested. All other foreign currency translation gains
and losses are recognised in the income statement.
The presentation currency in the annual report is DKK.
Segment reporting
Segment information is based on the Group’s man-
agement and internal financial reporting system and
supports the management decisions on allocation of
resources and assessment of the Group’s results di-
vided into segments.
The operational business segments in the Tryg are Pri-
vate, Commercial, Corporate and Sweden. Private en-
compasses the sale of insurances to private individu-
als in Denmark and Norway. Commercial
encompasses the sale of insurances to small and me-
dium sized businesses, in Denmark and Norway. Cor-
porate sells insurances to industrial clients primarily
in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In addition, Corpo-
rate handles all business involving brokers. Sweden
encompasses the sale of insurance products to pri-
vate individuals in Sweden as well as sale of Product
insurances in the nordic region.
Geographical information is presented on the basis of
the economic environment in which the Tryg Group
operates. The geographical areas are Denmark, Nor-
way and Sweden.
Segment income and segment costs as well as seg-
ment assets and liabilities comprise those items that
can be directly attributed to each individual segment
and those items that can be allocated to the individual
segments on a reliable basis. Unallocated items pri-
marily comprise assets and liabilities concerning in-
vestment activity managed at Group level.
Key ratios
Earnings per share (EPS) are calculated according to
IAS 33. This and other key ratios are calculated in ac-
cordance with Recommendations and Ratios 2015 is-
sued by the Danish Society of Financial Analysts and
the Executive Order on Financial Reports for Insur-
ance Companies and Multi-Employer Occupational
Pension Funds issued by the Danish Financial Super-
visory Authority.
Income statement
Premiums
Premium income represents gross premiums
written during the year, net of reinsurance premiums
and adjusted for changes in premium provisions,
corresponding to an accrual of premiums to the risk
period of the policies, and in the reinsurers’ share
of the premium provisions.
Premiums are calculated as premium income in ac-
cordance with the risk exposure over the cover period,
calculated separately for each individual insurance
contract. The calculation is generally based on the pro
rata method, although this is adjusted for an unevenly
divided risk between lines of business with strong
seasonal variations or for policies lasting many years.
The portion of premiums received on contracts that
relate to unexpired risks at the statement of financial
position date is reported under premium provisions.
The portion of premiums paid to reinsurers that relate
to unexpired risks at the statement of financial posi-
tion date is reported as the reinsurers’ share of pre-
mium provisions.
Technical interest
According to the Danish FSA’s executive order, techni-
cal interest is presented as a calculated return on the
year's average insurance liability provisions, net of re-
insurance. The calculated interest return for grouped
classes of risks is calculated as the monthly average
provision plus an actual interest from the present
yield curve for each individual group of risks. The in-
terest is applied according to the expected run-off
pattern of the provisions.
Insurance technical interest is reduced by the portion
of the increase in net provisions that relates to un-
winding.
| Contents – Financial statements
87
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Claims
Claims are claims paid during the year and adjusted
for changes in claims provisions less the reinsurers’
share. In addition, the item includes run-off gains/
losses in respect of previous years. The portion of the
increase in provisions which can be ascribed to un-
winding is transferred to insurance technical interest.
Claims are shown inclusive of direct and indirect
claims handling costs, including costs of inspecting
and assessing claims, costs to combat and mitigate
damage and other direct and indirect costs associated
with the handling of claims incurred.
Changes in claims provisions due to changes in yield
curve and exchange rates are recognised as a price
adjustment.
Tryg hedges the risk of changes in future pay and price
figures for provisions for workers’ compensation. Tryg
uses zero coupon inflation swaps acquired with a view
to hedging the inflation risk. Value adjustments of
these swaps are included in claims, thereby reducing
the effect of changes to inflation expectations under
claims.
Bonus and premium discounts
Bonuses and premium discounts represent antici-
pated and refunded premiums to policyholders,
where the amount refunded depends on the claims
record, and for which the criteria for payment have
been defined prior to the financial year or when the
insurance was taken out.
Insurance operating expenses
Insurance operating costs represent acquisition costs
and administration expenses less reinsurance com-
missions received. Expenses relating to acquiring and
renewing the insurance portfolio are recognised at the
time of writing the business. Underwriting commis-
sion is recognised when a legal obligation occurs. Ad-
ministration expenses are all other expenses attribut-
able to the administration of the insurance portfolio.
Administration expenses are accrued to match the fi-
nancial year.
Leasing
Leases are classified either as operating or finance
leases. The assessment of the lease is based on crite-
ria such as ownership, right of purchase when the
lease term expires, considerations as to whether the
asset is custom- made, the lease term and the present
value of the lease payments.
Assets held under operating leases are not recognised
in the statement of financial position, but the lease
payments are recognised in the income statement
over the term of the lease, corresponding to the eco-
nomic lifetime of the asset. The Group has no assets
held under finance leases.
Share-based payment
The Tryg Group’s incentive programmes comprise
share option programmes, employee shares and
matching shares.
Share option programme
The share option programme was closed in 2012
The value of services received as consideration for op-
tions granted is measured at the fair value of the op-
tions.
Equity-settled share options are measured at fair value at
the time of allocation and recognised under staff expenses
over the period from the time of allocation until vesting.
The balancing item is recognised directly in equity.
The options are issued at an exercise price that corre-
sponds to the market price of the Group’s shares at
the time of allocation plus 10%. No other vesting con-
ditions apply. Special provisions are in place concern-
ing sickness and death and in case of change to the
Group’s capital position etc.
The share option agreement entitles the employee to
the options unless the employee resigns his position or
is dismissed due to breach of the contract of employ-
ment. In case of termination due to restructuring or re-
tirement, the employee is still entitled to the options.
The share options are exercisable exclusively during a
13-day period, which starts the day after the publica-
tion of full-year, half-year and quarterly reports and in
accordance with Tryg’s in-house rules on trading in the
Group’s shares. The options are settled in shares. A part
of the Group’s holding of own shares is reserved for set-
tlement of the options allocated.
The fair value of the options granted is estimated using
the Black & Scholes option model. The calculation
takes into account the terms and conditions of the
share options granted.
Employee shares
According to established rules, the Group’s employees
can be granted a bonus in the form of employee shares.
When the bonus is granted, employees can choose be-
tween receiving shares or cash. The expected value of the
shares will be expensed over the vesting period. The
scheme will be treated as a complex financial instrument,
consisting of the right to cash settlement and the right to
request delivery of shares. The difference between the
value of shares and the cash payment is recognised in eq-
uity and is not remeasured. The remainder is treated as a
liability and is remeasured until the time of exercise, such
that the total recognition is based on the actual number
of shares or the actual cash amount.
Matching shares
Members of Executive Management and risk takers
have been allocated shares in accordance with the
“Matching shares” scheme. Under Matching shares, the
individual management member or risk takers is allo-
cated one share in Tryg A/S for each share the Execu-
tive management member or risk taker acquires in Tryg
A/S at the market rate for certain liquid cash at a con-
tractually agreed sum in connection with the Match-
ing share programme.
The holder acquires the shares in the open window
following publication of the annual report for the pre-
vious year. The shares (matching shares) are provided
free of charge, four years after the time of purchase.
The holder may not sell the shares until six months af-
ter the matching time.
The shares are recognised at market value and are ac-
crued over the four-year maturation period, based on
the market price at the time of acquisition. Recogni-
tion is from the end of the month of acquisition under
staff expenses with a balancing entry directly in eq-
uity. If an Executive Management member or risk-
taker retires during the maturation period but remains
entitled to shares, the remaining expense is recog-
nised in the current accounting year.
Investment activities
Income from associates includes the Group’s share of
the associates’ net profit.
Income from investment properties before fair value
adjustment represents the profit from property opera-
tions less property management expenses.
Interest and dividends represent interest earned and
dividends received during the financial year. Realised
and unrealised investment gains and losses, including
gains and losses on derivative financial instruments,
value adjustment of investment property, foreign cur-
rency translation adjustments and the effect of move-
ments in the yield curve used for discounting, are rec-
ognised as price adjustments.
Investment management charges represent expenses
relating to the management of investments including
salary and management fees on the investment area.
| Contents – Financial statements
88
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Other income and expenses
Other income and expenses include income and ex-
penses which cannot be ascribed to the Group´s in-
surance portfolio or investment assets, including the
sale of products for Nordea Liv & Pension.
Discontinued and divested business
Discontinued and divested business is consolidated in
one item in the income statement and supplemented
with disclosure of the discontinued and divested busi-
ness in a note to the financial statements. Discontin-
ued and divested business includes gross premiums,
gross claims, gross costs, profit/loss on ceded busi-
ness, insurance technical interest net of reinsurance,
investment return after insurance technical interest,
other income and costs and tax in respect of the dis-
continued business. Any reversal of earlier impair-
ment is recognised under other income and costs.
The statement of financial position items concerning
discontinued activities are reported unchanged under
the respective entries whereas assets and liabilities con-
cerning divested activities are consolidated under one
item as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale.
The comparative figures, including five-year financial
highlights and key ratios, have been restated to reflect
discontinued business. Discontinued and divested
business in the income statement includes the profit/
loss after tax of the run-off for the marine hull busi-
ness and the divested activities in the Finnish branch.
Discontinued business also comprises the Tryg For-
sikring A/S run-off business.
Statement of financial position
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Goodwill was acquired in connection with acquisition
of business. Goodwill is calculated as the difference
between the cost of the undertaking and the fair value
of acquired identifiable assets, liabilities and contin-
gent liabilities at the time of acquisition. Goodwill is al-
located to the cash-generating units under which
management manages the investment and is recog-
nised under intangible assets. Goodwill is not amor-
tised but is tested for depreciation at least once per
year.
Trademarks and customer relations
Trademarks and customer relations have been identi-
fied as intangible assets on acquisition. The intangible
assets are recognised at fair value at the time of ac-
quisition and amortised on a straight-line basis over
the expected economic lifetime of 5–12 years.
Software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised
on the basis of the costs incidental to acquiring and
bringing to use the specific software. The costs are
amortised based on an estimated economic lifetime
of up to 4 years.
Costs for group developed software that are directly
connected with the production of identifiable and
unique software products, where there is sufficient cer-
tainty that future earnings will exceed the costs in more
than one year, are reported as intangible assets. Direct
costs include personnel costs for software development
and directly attributable relevant fixed costs. All other
costs connected with the development or maintenance
of software are continuously charged as expenses.
After completion of the development work, the asset
is amortised according to the straight-line method
over the assessed economic lifetime, though over a
maximum of 4 years. The amortisation basis is re-
duced by any impairment and write-downs.
and are amortized in accordance with the amortiza-
tion periods stated above.
Fixed assets
Operating equipment
Fixtures and operating equipment are measured
at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accu-
mulated impairment losses. Cost encompasses the
purchase price and costs directly attributable to the
acquisition of the relevant assets until the time when
such assets are ready to be brought into use.
Depreciation of operating equipment is calculated
using the straight-line method over its estimated
economic lifetime as follows:
•
IT, 4 – 8 years
• Vehicles, 5 years
• Furniture, fittings and equipment, 5-10 years
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the ex-
pected economic lifetime, however maximally the
term of the lease.
Gains and losses on disposals and retired assets are
determined by comparing proceeds with carrying
amounts. Gains and losses are recognised in the in-
come statement. When revalued assets are sold, the
amounts included in the revaluation reserves are
transferred to retained earnings.
Land and buildings
Land and buildings are divided into owner-occupied
property and investment property. The Group’s
owner-occupied properties consist of the head office
buildings in Ballerup and Bergen and a small number
of holiday homes. The remaining properties are clas-
sified as investment property.
Assets under construction
Group-developed intangibles are recorded under the
entry “Assets under construction” until they are put
into use, whereupon they are reclassified as software
Owner-occupied property
Owner-occupied property is property that is used in
the Group’s operations. Owner-occupied properties
are measured in the statement of financial position at
their revalued amounts, being the fair value at the date
of revaluation, less any subsequent accumulated de-
preciation and impairment losses. Revaluations are
performed regularly to avoid material differences be-
tween the carrying amounts and fair values of owner-
occupied property at the statement of financial posi-
tion date. The fair value is calculated on the basis of
market-specific rental income per property and typical
operating expenses for the coming year. The resulting
operating income is divided by the required return on
the property in per cent, which is adjusted to reflect
market interest rates and property characteristics, cor-
responding to the present value of a perpetual annuity.
Increases in the revalued carrying amounts of owner-
occupied property are recognised in the revaluation
reserve in equity. Decreases that offset previous reval-
uations of the same asset are charged against the re-
valuation reserves directly in equity; all other de-
creases are charged to the income statement.
Costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or
recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, when
it is probable that future economic benefits associ-
ated with the item will flow to the Group, and the cost
of the item can be measured reliably. Ordinary repair
and maintenance costs are expensed in the income
statement when incurred.
Depreciation on owner-occupied property is calcu-
lated based on the straight-line method and using an
estimated economic lifetime of up to 50 years. Land is
not depreciated.
Assets under construction
In connection with the refurbishment of owner-occu-
pied property, costs to be capitalised are recognised at
cost under owner-occupied property. On completion of
the project, it is reclassified as owner-occupied prop-
erty, and depreciation is made on a straight-line basis
over the expected economic lifetime, up to the number
of years stated under the individual categories.
| Contents – Financial statements
89
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Investment property
Properties held for renting yields that are not occupied
by the Group are classified as investment properties.
based on business plans. The business plans are
based on past experience and expected market devel-
opments.
Investment property is recognised at fair value. Fair
value is based on market prices, adjusted for any dif-
ferences in the nature, location or maintenance con-
dition of specific assets. If this information is not avail-
able, the Group uses alternative valuation methods
such as discounted cash flow projections and recent
prices in the market.
The fair value is calculated on the basis of market-
specific rental income per property and typical oper-
ating expenses for the coming year. The resulting op-
erating income is divided by the required return on the
property in per cent, which is adjusted to reflect mar-
ket interest rates and property characteristics, corre-
sponding to the present value of a perpetual annuity.
The value is subsequently adjusted with the value in
use of the return on prepayments and deposits and
adjustments for specific property issues such as va-
cant premises or special tenant terms and conditions.
Changes in fair values are recorded in the income
statement.
Impairment test for intangible assets,
property and operating equipment
Operating equipment and intangible assets are as-
sessed at least once per year to ensure that the depre-
ciation method and the depreciation period that is
used are connected to the expected economic life-
time. This also applies to the salvage value. Write-
down is performed if depreciation has been demon-
strated. A continuous assessment of owner-occupied
property is performed.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, or more
often if there are indications of impairment, and im-
pairment testing is performed for each cash-generat-
ing unit to which the asset belongs. The present value
is normally established using budgeted cash flows
Equity investments in Group undertakings
The parent company’s equity investments in subsidi-
aries are recognised and measured using the equity
method. The parent company’s share of the enter-
prises’ profits or losses after elimination of unrealised
intra-group profits and losses is recognised in the in-
come statement. In the statement of financial posi-
tion, equity investments are measured at the pro rata
share of the enterprises’ equity.
Subsidiaries with a negative net asset value are recog-
nised at zero value. Any receivables from these enter-
prises are written down by the parent company’s
share of such negative net asset value where the re-
ceivables are deemed irrecoverable. If the negative
net asset value exceeds the amount receivable, the re-
maining amount is recognised under provisions if the
parent company has a legal or constructive obligation
to cover the liabilities of the relevant enterprise.
Net revaluation of equity investments in subsidiaries
is taken to reserve for net revaluation under equity if
the carrying amount exceeds cost.
The results of foreign subsidiaries are based on trans-
lation of the items in the income statement using av-
erage exchange rates for the period unless they devi-
ate significantly from the transaction day exchange
rates. Income and costs in domestic enterprises de-
nominated in foreign currencies are translated using
the exchange rates applicable on the transaction date.
Statement of financial position items of foreign sub-
sidiaries are translated using the exchange rates appli-
cable at the statement of financial position date.
Equity investments in associates
Associates are enterprises in which the Group has sig-
nificant influence but not control, generally in the form
of an ownership interest of between 20% and 50% of
the voting rights. Equity investments in associates are
measured using the equity method so that the carrying
amount of the investment represents the Group’s pro-
portionate share of the enterprises’ net assets.
Profit after tax from equity investments in associates
is included as a separate line in the income statement.
Income is made up after elimination of unrealised in-
tra-group profits and losses.
Associates with a negative net asset value are meas-
ured at zero value. If the Group has a legal or construc-
tive obligation to cover the associate’s negative bal-
ance, such obligation is recognised under liabilities.
Investments
Investments include financial assets at fair value
which are recognised in the income statement. The
classification depends on the purpose for which the
investments were acquired. Management determines
the classification of its investments on initial recogni-
tion and re-evaluates this at every reporting date.
Financial assets measured at fair value with recogni-
tion of value adjustments in the income statement
comprise assets that form part of a trading portfolio
and financial assets designated at fair value with value
adjustment via the income statement.
Financial assets at fair value recognised
in income statement
Financial assets are recognised at fair value on initial
recognition if they are entered in a portfolio that is man-
aged in accordance with fair value. Derivative financial
instruments are similarly classified as financial assets
held for sale, unless they are classified as security.
Realised and unrealised profits and losses that may
arise as a result of changes in the fair value for the cate-
gory financial assets at fair value are recognised in the
income statement in the period in which they arise.
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to
receive cash flows from the financial assets have ex-
pired, or if they have been transferred, and the Group
has also transferred substantially all risks and rewards
of ownership. Financial assets are recognised and
derecognised on a trade date basis, the date on which
the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.
The fair values of quoted securities are based on
stock exchange prices at the statement of financial
position date. For securities that are not listed on a
stock exchange, or for which no stock exchange price
is quoted that reflects the fair value of the instrument,
the fair value is determined using valuation tech-
niques. These include the use of similar recent arm’s
length transactions, reference to other similar instru-
ments or discounted cash flow analysis.
Derivative financial instruments
and hedge accounting
The Group’s activities expose it to financial risks, in-
cluding changes in share prices, foreign exchange rates,
interest rates and inflation. Forward exchange con-
tracts and currency swaps are used for currency hedg-
ing of portfolios of shares, bonds, hedging of foreign
entities and insurance statement of financial position
items. Interest rate derivatives in the form of futures,
forward contracts, repos, swaps and FRAs are used to
manage cash flows and interest rate risks related to the
portfolio of bonds and insurance provisions. Share de-
rivatives in the form of futures and options are used
from time to time to adjust share exposures.
Derivative financial instruments are reported from the
trading date and are measured in the statement of fi-
nancial position at fair value. Positive fair values of de-
rivatives are recognised as derivative financial instru-
ments under assets. Negative fair values of derivatives
are recognised under derivative financial instruments
under liabilities. Positive and negative values are only
offset when the company is entitled or intends to
make net settlement of more financial instruments.
| Contents – Financial statements
90
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Calculation of value is generally performed on the ba-
sis of rates supplied by Danske Bank with relevant in-
formation providers and is checked by the Group’s
valuation technicians. Discounting on the basis of
market interest rates is applied in the case of deriva-
tive financial instruments involving an expected future
cash flow.
Recognition of the resulting gain or loss depends on
whether the derivative is designated as a hedging in-
strument and, if so, the nature of the item being
hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as
hedges of investments in foreign entities. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives that are designated and
qualify as net investment hedges in foreign entities and
which provide effective currency hedging of the net in-
vestment are recognised directly in equity. The net as-
set value of the foreign entities estimated at the begin-
ning of the financial year is hedged 90-100% by
entering into short-term forward exchange contracts
according to the requirements of hedge accounting.
Changes in the fair value relating to the ineffective por-
tion are recognised in the income statement. Gains
and losses accumulated in equity are included in the
income statement on disposal of the foreign entity.
Reinsurers’ share of provisions for insurance con-
tracts
Contracts entered into by the Group with reinsurers
under which the Group is compensated for losses on
one or more contracts issued by the Group and that
meet the classification requirements for insurance
contracts are classified as reinsurers’ share of provi-
sions for insurance contracts. Contracts that do not
meet these classification requirements are classified
as financial assets.
The benefits to which the Group is entitled under its
reinsurance contracts held are recognised as assets
and reported as reinsurers’ share of provisions for in-
surance contracts.
Amounts receivable from reinsurers are measured
consistently with the amounts associated with the re-
insured insurance contracts and in accordance with
the terms of each reinsurance contract.
Changes due to unwinding are recognised in insur-
ance technical interest. Changes due to changes in
the yield curve or foreign exchange rates are recog-
nised as price adjustments.
The Group continuously assesses its reinsurance as-
sets for impairment. If there is objective evidence that
the reinsurance asset is impaired, the Group reduces
the carrying amount of the reinsurance asset to its re-
coverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised
in the income statement.
Receivables
Total receivables comprise accounts receivable
from policyholders and insurance companies as
well as other accounts receivable. Other receivables
primarily contain accounts receivable in connection
with property.
Receivables that arise as a result of insurance con-
tracts are classified in this category and are reviewed
for impairment as a part of the impairment test of ac-
counts receivable.
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value and are
subsequently assessed at amortised cost. The income
statement includes an estimated reservation for expected
unobtainable sums when there is a clear indication of as-
set impairment. The reservation entered is assessed as
the difference between the carrying amount of an asset
and the present value of expected future cash flows.
Other assets
Other assets include current tax assets and cash at
bank and in hand. Current tax assets are receivables
concerning tax for the year adjusted for on-account
payments and any prior-year adjustments. Cash at
bank and in hand is recognised at nominal value at the
statement of financial position date.
tax on the Norwegian and Swedish contingency fund
reserves is allocated.
Prepayments and accrued income
Prepayments include expenses paid in respect of sub-
sequent financial years and interest receivable. Accrued
underwriting commission relating to the sale of insur-
ance products is also included.
Dividends
Proposed dividend is recognised as a liability at the
time of adoption by the shareholders at the annual
general meeting (date of declaration).
Equity
Share capital
Shares are classified as equity when there is no obliga-
tion to transfer cash or other assets. Costs directly at-
tributable to the issue of equity instruments are shown
in equity as a deduction from the proceeds, net of tax.
Revaluation reserves
Revaluation of owner-occupied property is recognised
in other comprehensive income unless the revaluation
offsets a previous impairment loss.
Foreign currency translation reserve
Assets and liabilities of foreign entities are recognised
using the exchange rate applicable at the statement of
financial position date. Income and expense items are
recognised using the average monthly exchange rates
for the period. Any resulting differences are recognised
in Other comprehensive income. When an entity is
wound up, the balance is transferred to the income
statement. The hedging of the currency risk in respect of
foreign entities is also offset in other comprehensive in-
come in respect of the part that concerns the hedge.
Contingency fund reserves
Contingency fund reserves are recognised as part of re-
tained earnings under equity. The reserves may only be
used when so permitted by the Danish Financial Super-
visory Authority and when it is for the benefit of the pol-
icyholders. The Norwegian contingency fund reserves
include provisions for the Norwegian Natural Perils
Pool and security reserve. The Danish and Swedish pro-
visions comprise contingency fund provisions. Deferred
Own shares
The purchase and sale sums of own shares and divi-
dends thereon are taken directly to retained earnings
under equity. Own shares include shares acquired for
incentive programmes and share buyback programme.
Proceeds from the sale of own shares in connection
with the exercise of share options or matching shares
are taken directly to equity.
Subordinate loan capital
Subordinate loan capital is recognised initially at fair
value, net of transaction costs incurred. Subordinate
loan capital is subsequently stated at amortised cost;
any difference between the proceeds (net of transac-
tion costs) and the redemption value is recognised in
the income statement over the borrowing period us-
ing the effective interest method.
Provisions for insurance contracts
Premiums written are recognised in the income state-
ment (premium income) proportionally over the pe-
riod of coverage and, where necessary, adjusted to re-
flect any time variation of the risk. The portion of
premiums received on in-force contracts that relates
to unexpired risks at the statement of financial posi-
tion date is reported as premium provisions. Premium
provisions are generally calculated according to a
best estimate of expected payments throughout the
agreed risk period; however, as a minimum as the part
of the premium calculated using the pro rata temporis
principle until the next payment date. Adjustments
are made to reflect any risk variations. This applies to
gross as well as ceded business.
| Contents – Financial statements
91
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Claims and claims handling costs are expensed in the
income statement as incurred based on the estimated
liability for compensation owed to policyholders or
third parties sustaining losses at the hands of the pol-
icy- holders. They include direct and indirect claims
handling costs that arise from events that have oc-
curred up to the statement of financial position date
even if they have not yet been reported to the Group.
Claims provisions are estimated using the input of as-
sessments for individual cases reported to the Group
and statistical analyses for the claims incurred but not
reported and the expected ultimate cost of more
complex claims that may be affected by external fac-
tors (such as court decisions). The provisions include
claims handling costs.
Claims provisions are discounted. Discounting is
based on a yield curve reflecting duration applied to
the expected future payments from the provision. Dis-
counting affects the motor liability, professional liabil-
ity, workers’ compensation and personal accident and
health insurance classes, in particular.
Provisions for bonuses and premium discounts etc. rep-
resent amounts expected to be paid to policyholders in
view of the claims experience during the financial year.
Claims provisions are determined for each line of
business based on actuarial methods. Where such
business lines encompass more than one business
area, short-tailed claims provisions are distributed
based on number of claims reported while long-tailed
claims provisions are distributed based on premiums
earned. The models currently used are Chain-Ladder,
Bornhuetter-Ferguson, the Loss Ratio method and De
Vylder’s credibility method. Chain-Ladder techniques
are used for lines of business with a stable run-off pat-
tern. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, and some-
times the Loss Ratio method, are used for claims
years in which the previous run-off provides insuffi-
cient information about the future run-off perfor-
mance. De Vylder’s credibility method is used for ar-
eas that are somewhere in between the Chain-Ladder
and Bornhuetter-Ferguson/Loss Ratio methods, and
may also be used in situations that call for the use of
exposure targets other than premium volume, for ex-
ample the number of insured.
The provision for annuities under workers’ compensa-
tion insurance is calculated on the basis of a mortality
corresponding to the G82 calculation basis (official
mortality table).
In some instances, the historic data used in the actu-
arial models is not necessarily predictive of the ex-
pected future development of claims. For example,
this is the case with legislative changes where an a
priori estimate is used for premium increases related
to the expected increase in claims. In connection with
legislative changes, the same estimate is used for de-
termining the change in the level of claims. Subse-
quently, this estimate is maintained until new loss his-
tory materialises which can be used for re-estimation.
Several assumptions and estimates underlying the
calculation of the claims provisions are mutually de-
pendent. Most importantly, this can be expected to be
the case for assumptions relating to interest rates and
inflation.
Workers’ compensation is an area in which explicit infla-
tion assumptions are used, with annuities for the in-
sured being indexed based on the workers’ compensa-
tion index. An inflation curve that reflects the market’s
inflation expectations plus a real wage spread is used as
an approximation to the workers’ compensation index.
For other lines of business, the inflation assumptions,
because present only implicitly in the actuarial mod-
els, will cause a certain lag in predicting the level of fu-
ture losses when a change in inflation occurs. On the
other hand, the effect of discounting will show imme-
diately as a consequence of inflation changes to the
extent that such changes affect the interest rate.
Other correlations are not deemed to be significant.
Liability adequacy test
Tests are continuously performed to ensure the ade-
quacy of the insurance provisions. In performing
these tests, current best estimates of future cash
flows of claims, gains and direct and indirect claims
handling costs are used. Any deficiency results in an
increase in the relevant provision, and the adjustment
is recognised in the income statement.
Employee benefits
Pension obligations
The Group operates various pension schemes. The
schemes are funded through contributions to insur-
ance companies or trustee-administered funds. In
Norway, the Group operates a defined-benefit plan. In
Denmark, the Group operates a defined-contribution
plan. A defined-contribution plan is a pension plan un-
der which the Group pays fixed contributions into a
separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or con-
structive obligation to pay further contributions. In
Sweden, the Group complies with the industry pension
agreement, FTP-Planen. FTP-Planen is primarily a de-
fined-benefit plan as regards the future pension bene-
fits. Försäkringsbranschens Pensionskassa (FPK) is
unable to provide sufficient information for the Group
to use defined-benefit accounting. The plan is there-
fore accounted for as a defined-contribution plan.
For the defined-benefit plan recognised in the state-
ment of financial position, an annual actuarial calcula-
tion is made of the capital value of the future benefits
to which employees are entitled as a result of their
employment with the group so far and which must be
disbursed according to the plan. The capital value is
calculated using the Projected Unit Credit Method,
which are based on input Cf. note 20.
The capital value of the pension obligations less the
fair value of any plan assets is recognised in the state-
ment of financial position under pension assets and
pension obligations, respectively, depending on
whether the net amount is an asset or a liability.
In case of changes to assumptions concerning the
discounting factor, inflation, mortality and disability or
in case of differences between expected and realised
returns on pension assets, actuarial gains or losses
ensue. These gains and losses are recognised under
other comprehensive income.
In case of changes to the benefits stemming from the
employees' employment with the group so far,
a change is seen in the actuarially calculated capital
value which is considered as pension costs for previ-
ous financial years. The change is recognised in the
results immediately. Net finance costs for the year are
recognised in the investment return. All other costs
are recognised under insurance operating costs. The
plan is closed for new business.
Other employee benefits
Employees of the Group are entitled to a fixed pay-
ment when they reach retirement and when they have
been employed with the Group for 25 and for 40
years. The Group recognises this liability at the time of
signing the contract of employment.
In special instances, the employee can enter into a
contract with the Group to receive compensation for
loss of pension benefits caused by reduced working
hours. The Group recognises this liability based on
statistical models.
Income tax and deferred tax
The Group expenses current tax according to the tax
laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. Current
tax liabilities and current tax receivables are recog-
nised in the statement of financial position as esti-
| Contents – Financial statements
92
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
mated tax on the taxable income for the year, adjusted
for change in tax on prior years’ taxable income and
for tax paid under the on-account tax scheme.
Deferred tax is measured according to the statement
of financial position liability method on all timing dif-
ferences between the tax and accounting value of as-
sets and liabilities. Deferred income tax is measured
using the tax rules and tax rates that apply in the rele-
vant countries on the statement of financial position
date when the deferred tax asset is realised or the
deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets, including the tax value
of tax losses carried forward, are recognised to the
extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will
be realised against which the temporary differences
can be offset.
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary
differences concerning investments, except where
Tryg controls when the temporary difference will be
realised, and it is probable that the temporary differ-
ence will not be realised in the foreseeable future.
Other provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a legal
or constructive obligation as a result of an event prior
to or at the statement of financial position date, and it
is probable that future economic benefits will flow out
of the Group. Provisions are measured at the best
estimate by management of the expenditure required
to settle the present obligation.
Provisions for restructurings are recognised as obliga-
tions when a detailed formal restructuring plan has
been announced prior to or at the statement of finan-
cial position date at the latest to the persons affected
by the plan.
Own insurance is included under other provisions.
The provisions apply to the Group’s own insurance
claims and are reported when the damage occurs
according to the same principle as the Group’s
other claims provisions.
Debt
Debt comprises debt in connection with direct
insurance and reinsurance, amounts owed to credit
institutions, current tax obligations and other debt.
Derivative financial instruments are assessed at fair
value according to the same practice that applies to
financial assets. Other liabilities are assessed at amor-
tised cost based on the effective interest method.
Cash flow statement
The consolidated cash flow statement is presented
using the direct method and shows cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities as well as
the Group’s cash and cash equivalents at the begin-
ning and end of the financial year. No separate cash
flow statement has been prepared for the parent
company because it is included in the consolidated
cash flow statement.
Cash flows from operating activities are calculated
whereby major classes of gross cash receipts and
gross cash payments are disclosed.
Cash flows from investing activities comprise
payments in connection with the purchase and sale
of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment
as well as financial assets and deposits with credit
institutions.
Cash flows from financing activities comprise changes
in the size or composition of Tryg’s share capital and
related costs as well as the raising of loans, repayments
of interest-bearing debt and the payment of dividends.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash and
demand deposits.
| Contents – Financial statements
93
NotesAnnual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Income statement for Tryg A/S (parent company)
DKKm
Note
1
Investment activities
Income from Group undertakings
Interest expenses
Administration expenses in connection with investment activities
Total investment return
2 Other expenses
2,044
1
-7
2,038
-75
2,600
0
-7
2,593
-51
Profit/loss before tax
1,963
2,542
3
Tax
Profit/loss on continuing business
Profit/loss for the year
Proposed distribution for the year:
Dividend
Transferred to reserve for net revaluation according to the equity method
Transferred to retained earnings
18
1,981
1,981
1,759
-1,656
1,878
1,981
15
2,557
2,557
1,731
143
683
2,557
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
Note
Statement of comprehensive income
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
1,981
2,557
Other comprehensive income which cannot subsequently
be reclassified as profit or loss
Change in equalisation provision and other provisions
Change in taxes on security provisions
Revaluation of owner-occupied property for the year
Tax on revaluation of owner-occupied property for the year
Actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans
Tax on actuarial gains/losses on defined-benefit pension plans
Other comprehensive income which can subsequently
be reclassified as profit or loss
Exchange rate adjustments of foreign entities for the year
Hedging of currency risk in foreign entities for the year
Tax on hedging of currency risk in foreign entities for the year
Total other comprehensive income
21
141
4
2
-12
3
159
-89
86
-21
-24
135
26
0
2
0
-46
12
-6
-178
191
-47
-34
-40
Comprehensive income
2,116
2,517
| Contents – Financial statements
94
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Statement of financial position for Tryg A/S (parent company)
DKKm
2015
2014
Note
4
Assets
Equity investments in Group undertakings
Total investments in Group undertakings
10,322
10,322
11,843
11,843
Total investment assets
10,322
11,843
5
Current tax assets
Cash at bank and in hand
Total other assets
18
1
19
14
0
14
Total assets
10,341
11,857
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Debt to Group undertakings
Other debt
Total debt
9,846
11,134
487
8
495
718
5
723
Total equity and liabilities
10,341
11,857
6
7
8
9
10
11
Deferred tax assets
Capital adequacy
Contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and collateral
Related parties
Reconciliation of profit/loss and equity
Accounting policies
| Contents – Financial statements
95
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Statement of changes in equity (parent company)
DKKm
Equity at 31 December 2014
2015
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
Nullification of own shares
Dividend paid
Dividend own shares
Purchase and sale of own shares
Exercise of share options
Issue of employee shares
Issue of share options and matching shares
Total changes in equity in 2015
Equity at 31 December 2015
Share
capital
Revaluation
reserves
Retained
earnings
Proposed
dividend
Total
1,492
4,856
3,055
1,731
11,134
-1,656
135
-1,521
0
-44
-44
1,448
-1,521
3,335
1,878
1,759
1,878
44
97
-1,044
13
2
5
995
4,050
1,759
-2,477
-718
1,013
1,981
135
2,116
0
-2,477
97
-1,044
13
2
5
-1,288
9,846
Dividend per share in 2015 includes dividend paid
out in July of DKK 2.50 and proposed dividend of
DKK 3.50, totalling DKK 6.00 (DKK 5.80 in 2014 ).
Proposed dividend per share of DKK 3.50 is calculated
as the total dividend proposed by the Supervisory
Board after the end of the financial year divided by
the total number of shares at the end of the year
(289,559,550 shares). The dividend is not paid until
approved by the shareholders at the annual general
meeting.
The possible payment of dividend from Tryg Forsikring
A/S to Tryg A/S is influenced by contingency fund
provisions of DKK 2,516m (DKK 2,622m in 2014)
The contingency fund provisions can be used to cover
losses in connection with the settlement of insurance
provisions or otherwise for the benefit of the insured.
Equity at 31 December 2013
1,533
4,753
3,180
1,656
11,122
2014
Profit/loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
Nullification of own shares
Dividend paid
Dividend, own shares
Purchase and sale of own shares
Exercise of share options
Issue of employee shares
Issue of share options and matching shares
Total changes in equity in 2014
Equity at 31 December 2014
143
-40
103
0
-41
-41
1,492
103
4,856
683
683
41
59
-1,005
49
45
3
-125
3,055
1,731
1,731
-1,656
75
1,731
2,557
-40
2,517
0
-1,656
59
-1,005
49
45
3
12
11,134
| Contents – Financial statements
96
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
1
Income from Group undertakings
Tryg Forsikring A/S
2
Other expenses
Administration expenses
2,044
2,044
-75
-75
2,600
2,600
-51
-51
Remuneration for the Executive Management is paid partly by Tryg A/S and partly by Tryg Forsikring
A/S and Tryg Forsikring, a Norwegian branch of Tryg Forsikring A/S and is charged to Tryg A/S via the
cost allocation.
Remuneration for the Supervisory Board, the Executive Management and risk-takers can be seen
from note 28 concerning related parties of the Tryg Group. Refer to Note 6 of the consolidated
financial statements for a specification of the audit fee.
Average number of full-time employees for the year
15
3
Tax
Reconciliation of tax costs
Tax on profit/loss for the year
Tax adjustments, previous years
Effective tax rate
Tax on profit/loss for the year
Tax adjustment, previous years
19
-1
18
%
23.5
-1.0
22.5
13
14
1
15
%
24.5
0.5
25.0
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
4
Equity investments in Group undertakings
Cost
Cost at 1 January
Cost at 31 December
Revaluation and impairment to net asset value
Revaluation and impairment at 1 January
Revaluations for the year
Dividend paid
Revaluation and impairment at 31 December
6,987
6,987
4,856
2,179
-3,700
3,335
6,987
6,987
4,753
1,759
-1,656
4,856
Carrying amount at 31 December
10,322
11,843
Name and registered office
Ownership share in %
Equity
2015
Tryg Forsikring A/S, Ballerup
2014
Tryg Forsikring A/S, Ballerup
5
Current tax assets
Tax receivable at 1 January
Current tax for the year
Tax paid for the year
Tax receivable at 31 December
100
10,322
100
11,843
14
18
-14
18
14
14
-14
14
| Contents – Financial statements
97
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
6
Deferred tax assets
Capitalised tax losses
Tryg A/S
Non-capitalised tax losses
Tryg A/S
The loss in Tryg A/S can only be utilised in Tryg A/S.
The loss can be carried forward indefinitely.
The losses are not recognised as tax assets until it has been substantiated
that the company can generate sufficient future taxable income to offset
the tax losses.
2015
2014
DKKm
2015
2014
0
16
0
18
8
C ontractual obligations, contingent liabilities and collateral
The Danish companies in the Tryg Group are jointly taxed with TryghedsGruppen smba. The compa-
nies and the other jointly taxed companies are liable for any obligations to withhold taxes at source
on interest, royalties, dividends and income taxes etc. in respect of the jointly taxed companies.
Companies in the Tryg Group are party to a number of disputes in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Management believes that the outcome of these disputes will not affect the Group's financial
position over and above the receivables and liabilities recognised in the statement of financial
position at 31 December 2015.
7
Capital adequacy
Equity according to annual report
Proposed dividend
Solvency requirements of subsidiaries – 50%
Tier 1 capital
Subordinate loan capital
Solvency requirements of subsidiaries – 50%
Capital base
Weighted items
9,846
-1,013
-3,868
4,965
1,707
-3,868
2,804
11,134
-1,731
-2,353
7,050
1,496
-2,353
6,193
2,586
7,137
9
Related parties
Tryg A/S has no related parties with a controlling influence other than the parent company,
TryghedsGruppen smba. Related parties with a significant influence include the Supervisory Board,
the Executive Management and their members’ related family. Related parties are the same as for
the Tryg Group; please see Note 28 in the consolidated financial statements.
Parent company
TryghedsGruppen smba
TryghedsGruppen smba controls 60% of the shares in Tryg A/S.
Transactions with Group undertakings and associates
Tryg A/S exercises full control over Tryg Forsikring A/S.
Intra-group trading involved
- Providing and receiving services
- Intra-group accounts
-13
-487
-15
-718
Solvency ratio (Solvency I – ratio between capital
base and weighted assets)
108
87
Administration fee, etc. is settled on a cost-recovery basis.
Intra-group accounts are offset and carry interest on market terms.
| Contents – Financial statements
98
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Notes
DKKm
10
2015
2014
Reconciliation of profit/loss and equity
The executive order on application of International Financial Reporting Standards for companies sub-
ject to the Danish Financial Business Act issued by the Danish FSA requires disclosure of differences
between the format of the annual report under International Financial Reporting Standards and the
rules issued by the Danish FSA. The following is a reconciliation of profit/loss and equity.
Reconciliation of profit/loss
Profit/loss – IFRS
Profit/loss – Danish FSA executive order
Reconciliation of equity
Equity – IFRS
Deferred tax provisions for contingency funds
Equity – Danish FSA executive order
11
Accounting policies
Please refer to Tryg Group's accounting policies.
1,981
1,981
9,831
15
9,846
2,557
2,557
11,119
15
11,134
| Contents – Financial statements
99
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Q4
2015
Q3
2015
Q2
2015
Q1
2015
Q4
2014
Q3
2014
Q2
2014
Q1
2014
Q4
2013
A further detailed version of the presentation
can be downloaded from tryg.com/uk > investor
> Downloads > tables
2,172
285
2,211
398
2,226
434
2,194
181
2,249
400
2,289
445
2,275
494
2,238
273
2,290
286
Q4 2015 | Quarterly outline
DKKm
Private
Gross premium income
Technical result
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Combined ratio exclusive of run-off
Commercial
Gross premium income
Technical result
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Combined ratio exclusive of run-off
Corporate
Gross premium income
Technical result
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Combined ratio exclusive of run-off
106.2
71.3
2.3
73.6
13.4
87.0
89.3
970
147
62.3
5.5
67.8
17.2
85.0
91.3
949
5
69.2
20.5
89.7
9.7
99.4
65.1
2.3
67.4
14.7
82.1
86.5
1,022
136
77.1
-6.8
70.3
16.6
86.9
98.6
984
195
99.9
-30.1
69.8
10.6
80.4
98.1
63.3
2.1
65.4
15.3
80.7
83.7
997
220
55.7
5.2
60.9
17.2
78.1
84.5
993
99
170.5
-91.2
79.3
11.0
90.3
94.5
76.5
0.0
76.5
15.3
91.8
96.8
65.3
2.1
67.4
15.0
82.4
84.5
64.6
1.1
65.7
15.1
80.8
85.3
69.0
-2.6
66.4
12.4
78.8
82.4
72.1
0.4
72.5
15.5
88.0
93.7
75.6
-2.5
73.1
14.6
87.7
90.8
1,003
155
1,050
270
1,045
188
1,053
224
1,042
193
1,080
157
66.3
0.9
67.2
17.4
84.6
98.9
968
70
67.6
13.4
81.0
11.9
92.9
55.2
3.7
58.9
15.6
74.5
86.5
1,015
98
67.2
12.6
79.8
10.6
90.4
100.1
106.4
63.9
0.9
64.8
17.5
82.3
92.1
999
130
63.0
13.0
76.0
11.5
87.5
94.9
72.1
-5.6
66.5
12.6
79.1
81.9
1,030
180
73.3
0.1
73.4
9.5
82.9
86.8
63.9
0.3
64.2
17.7
81.9
86.9
989
19
81.5
4.6
86.1
12.6
98.7
73.8
-5.9
67.9
17.9
85.8
92.8
1,025
59
75.0
7.6
82.6
12.1
94.7
113.4
102.2
| Contents – Financial statements
100
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Q4 2015 | Quarterly outline
DKKm
Sweden
Gross premium income
Technical result
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Combined ratio exclusive of run-off
Other a)
Gross premium income
Technical result
Tryg
Gross premium income
Technical result
Investment return
Other income and costs
Profit/loss before tax
Profit/loss
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Combined ratio exclusive of run-off
Q4
2015
Q3
2015
Q2
2015
Q1
2015
Q4
2014
Q3
2014
Q2
2014
Q1
2014
Q4
2013
313
85
51.8
0.3
52.1
21.1
73.2
94.3
-11
0
373
38
73.2
0.5
73.7
15.8
89.5
92.4
-7
-120
342
72
61.1
0.0
61.1
17.8
78.9
93.2
-8
0
289
23
72.0
-0.7
71.3
20.8
92.1
100.1
-3
0
338
7
74.6
1.5
76.1
22.2
98.3
99.2
-6
0
386
30
76.2
0.8
77.0
15.5
92.5
97.7
-7
0
4,393
4,583
4,550
4,451
4,646
4,712
522
201
-19
704
721
68.0
6.2
74.2
14.2
88.4
93.9
647
-383
-20
244
580
76.6
-6.8
69.8
16.3
86.1
94.9
825
-84
-27
714
525
84.8
-17.8
67.0
15.2
82.2
87.1
429
261
-25
665
640
72.0
3.1
75.1
15.6
90.7
98.5
775
13
-20
768
593
64.1
4.7
68.8
14.9
83.7
91.0
793
-1
-10
782
869
64.9
3.7
68.6
15.1
83.7
90.0
358
43
69.3
-0.3
69.0
19.6
88.6
91.7
-5
0
4,711
941
259
-50
1,150
455
70.7
-2.6
68.1
12.6
80.7
84.1
317
38
64.4
4.4
68.8
19.9
88.7
91.5
-3
0
348
44
71.8
-2.9
68.9
19.3
88.2
94.5
-6
0
4,583
4,737
523
89
-10
602
565
71.7
1.6
73.3
15.9
89.2
96.5
546
154
-61
639
74.9
-1.2
73.7
15.4
89.1
94.3
The distribution on segments between Commercial
an Corporate as to medium sized enterprise has been
altered during Q1 2014.
Comparative figures have been restated accordingly.
a) Amounts relating to eliminations are included under
'Other'
A further detailed version of the presentation
can be downloaded from tryg.com/uk > investor >
Downloads > tables
| Contents – Financial statements
101
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Q4 2015 | Geographical segments
Q4
2015
2,330
289
116
65.2
9.3
74.5
13.1
87.6
1,611
124
44
74.4
4.3
78.7
13.8
92.5
463
109
81
54.6
3.0
57.6
19.0
76.6
DKKm
Danish general insurance a)
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Number of full-time employees 31 Dec.
Norwegian general insurance
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Number of full-time employees 31 Dec.
Swedish general insurance
Gross premium income
Technical result
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio
Combined ratio
Number of full-time employees 31 Dec.
| Contents – Financial statements
Q4
2014
2,346
651
262
52.1
7.9
60.0
12.4
72.4
1,839
190
86
73.1
0.9
74.0
16.0
90.0
467
-66
-10
89.1
3.9
93.0
21.4
114.4
9,346
1,371
512
80.5
-9.2
71.3
13.9
85.2
1,859
6,766
844
492
70.9
2.1
73.0
14.9
87.9
1,113
1,894
328
208
63.5
1.7
65.2
17.5
82.7
387
9,361
1,510
564
66.9
2.1
69.0
15.1
84.1
2,007
7,337
1,478
501
66.5
1.4
67.9
12.5
80.4
1,167
1,975
44
66
77.6
2.2
79.8
18.4
98.2
425
2015
2014
DKKm
Other b)
Gross premium income
Technical result
Tryg
Q4
2015
-11
0
Q4
2014
-6
0
2015
2014
-29
-120
-21
0
Gross premium income
4,393
4,646
17,977
18,652
Technical result
Investment return
Other income and costs
Profit/loss before tax
Run-off gains/losses, net of reinsurance
Key ratios
Gross claims ratio
Net reinsurance ratio
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross expense ratio C)
Combined ratio
522
201
-19
704
241
68.0
6.2
74.2
14.2
88.4
775
13
-20
768
338
64.1
4.7
68.8
14.9
83.7
2,423
-5
-91
2,327
1,212
75.4
-3.9
71.5
15.3
86.8
Number of full-time employees, continuing business at 31 Dec.
Number of full-time employees, discontinued and divested business at 31 Dec.
3,359
0
3,032
360
-90
3,302
1,131
67.8
1.8
69.6
14.6
84.2
3,599
0
a)
b)
Includes Danish general insurance and Finnish guarantee insurance.
Amounts relating to eliminations. In 2015 also restructuring expenses are included under 'Other'.
In 2014 the costs were positively affected by a one-time effect regarding changed pension terms in
Norway and they were negatively affected by a provision in connection with the transfer to the new
it-supplier. The joint effect was approx DKK 135m. In 2015 costs and claims were negatively effected
by DKK 80m and DKK 40m respectively due to provisioning for the efficiency programme.
c) Adjustment of gross expense ratio included only in 'Tryg '. The adjustment is explained in a footnote
to Financial highlights.
102
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Other key figures
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Claims ratio, net
Expense ratio, net with adjustment
Combined ratio, net with adjustment
Expense ratio, net without adjustment
Gross profit ratio
Profit ratio, net of reinsurance
Gross technical interest ratio
Technical interest ratio, net of reinsurance
Return on equity before tax on continuing business (%)
Return on equity after tax on continuing business (%)
Average premium provisions
Average claims provisions
Average reinsurers' share of provisions for insurance contracts
Reserve ratio, premium provisions (%)
Reserve ratio, claims provisions (%)
Total reserve ratio
Number of full-time employess, continued business, at 31 December
Number of full-time employess, discontinued and divested business,
at 31 December
Share performance
Earnings per share (DKK)
Diluted earnings per share (DKK)
Earnings per share of continuing business (DKK)
Number of shares (1,000)
Average number of shares (1,000)
Diluted average number of shares (1,000)
Share price (DKK)
Net asset value per share (DKK)
Market price/net asset value
Dividend per share (DKK)
Price/Earnings
70.1
15.8
85.9
15.6
13.5
14.4
0.1
0.1
22.2
18.4
5,691
25,350
2,557
31.0
141.4
172.4
3,359
68.3
15.0
83.3
14.8
16.3
17.3
0.3
0.3
29.7
22.9
6,012
25,680
2,279
31.2
135.5
166.7
3,599
70.8
16.1
86.9
15.9
12.8
13.6
0.3
0.3
27.1
21.5
6,450
26,665
2,469
31.8
133.8
165.6
3,703
70.7
16.9
87.6
16.6
12.3
13.0
0.3
0.3
30.2
21.8
6,810
27,073
2,192
32.9
134.1
167.0
3,913
0
0
0
189
6.95
6.95
6.77
282,316
285,073
285,101
137.40
34.82
4.0
6.00
20.3
8.74
8.73
8.70
289,120
292,521
292,788
137.80
38.46
3.6
5.80
15.8
7.88
7.86
7.89
296,870
300,777
301,295
104.90
37.41
2.8
5.40
13.3
7.30
7.27
7.21
303,474
302,455
303,571
85.30
36.18
2.4
5.20
11.8
75.7
17.0
92.7
16.9
7.9
8.3
0.9
0.9
18.4
13.1
6,876
25,894
1,828
34.8
134.9
169.7
4,076
242
3.77
3.77
3.80
301,866
302,003
302,003
63.80
29.84
2.1
1.30
16.8
In May 2015 each share with a nominal value of
DKK 25 was replaced by five new shares with a
nominal value of DKK 5. The share split did not
change the Group's share capital. Comparative
figures have been restated to reflect the change
in trading unit.
The expense ratio, net without adjustment, is
calculated as the ratio of actual insurance operating
costs, net of reinsurance to premium income, net
of reinsurance. Other key ratios are calculated in
accordance with ''Recommendations & Financial
Ratios 2015'' issued by the Danish Society of
Financial Analysts.
The adjustment, which is made pursuant to the Danish
Financial Supervisory Authority’s and the Danish
Society of Financial Analysts’ definitions of expence
ratio and combined ratio, involves the addition of a
calculated cost (rent) in respect of owner-occupied
property based on a calculated market rent and the
deduction of actual depreciation and operating costs
on owner-occupied property.
| Contents – Financial statements
103
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Group chart
Tryg A/S
(Denmark)
Tryg Forsikring A/S
(Denmark)
Tryg Garanti-
forsikring A/S
(Denmark)
Moderna
Försäkringar
(Branch Sweden)
Tryg Forsikring
incl. Enter
(Branch Norway)
A/S af 7. juli 2015
(Denmark)
Vesta
Eiendom AS
(Norway)
Tryg
Ejendomme A/S
(Denmark)
Optimal
Djurförsäkring
i Norr AB
(Sweden)
Respons
Inkasso AS
(Norway)
Tryg Garanti
(Branch Norway)
Moderna Garanti
(Branch Sweden)
Tryg Garanti
(Branch Finland)
Komplementar-
selskabet
af 1. marts
2006 ApS (50%)
Thunesvei 2 AS
(Norway)
ANS Grensen 3
(99%)
(Norway)
Group chart at 1 January 2016. Companies and branches are wholly owned by Danish
owners and domiciled in Denmark, unless otherwise stated.
Company
Branch
| Contents – Management’s review
104
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Glossary
The financial highlights and key ratios of Tryg have been prepared in accordance
with the Executive Order issued by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority
on the Financial Reports for Insurance Companies and Multi-Employer
Occupational Pension Funds and also comply with ‘Recommendations &
Financial Ratios 2015’ issued by the Danish Society of Financial Analysts.
Capital base
Equity plus share of subordinate loan capital and less
intangible assets, tax asset, discounting, equalisation
reserve and proposed dividend.
Earnings per share of continuing business
Diluted earnings from continuing business after tax
Diluted average number of shares
Claims ratio, net of ceded business
Gross claims ratio + net reinsurance ratio
Combined ratio
The sum of the gross claims ratio, the net reinsurance
ratio and the gross expense ratio.
Danish general insurance
Comprises the legal entities Tryg Forsikring A/S
(excluding the Norwegian and Swedish branches),
Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S (including Finnish branch)
and Securator A/S.
Gross claims ratio
Gross claims x 100
Gross premium income
Gross expense ratio
Calculated as the ratio of gross insurance operating
costs, including adjustment and gross premium
income. The adjustment involves the deduction
of depreciation and operating costs on the owner-
occupied property and the addition of a calculated
cost (rent) concerning the owner-occupied property
based on a calculated market rent.
Diluted average number of shares
Average number of shares adjusted for number of
share options which may potentially dilute.
Gross insurance operating costs with adjustment x 100
Gross premium income
Discounting
Expresses recognition in the financial statements of
expected future payments at a value below the nomi-
nal amount, as the recognised amount carries interest
until payment. The size of the discount depends on
the market-based discount rate applied and the ex-
pected time to payment.
Dividend per share
Proposed dividend
Number of shares at year-end
Earnings per share
Profit or loss for the year x 100
Average number of shares
| Contents – Management’s review
Gross expense ratio without adjustment
Gross insurance operating costs x 100
Gross premium income
Gross premium income
Calculated as gross premium income adjusted for
change in gross premium provisions, less bonuses
and premium discounts.
Gross profit ratio
Technical result x 100
Gross premium income
Gross technical interest ratio
Insurance technical interest net of reinsurance x 100
Gross premium income
Relative run-off gains/losses
Run-off gains/losses net of reinsurance relative to
claims provisions net of reinsurance, beginning of year.
Individual solvency
New Danish solvency requirements for insurance
companies comprising the companies’ own determi-
nation of their capital requirements calculated using
their own methods.
The rules entered into force on 1 January 2008, and
the figures must be reported to the Danish Financial
Supervisory Authority four times a year.
Reserve ratio, claims provisions
Claims provisions x 100
Gross premium income
Reserve ratio, premium provisions
Premium provisions x 100
Gross premium income
Market price/net asset value
Share price
Net asset value per share
Net asset value per share
Year-end equity
Number of shares at year-end
Net reinsurance ratio
Profit or loss from reinsurance x 100
Gross premium income
Norwegian general insurance
Comprises Tryg Forsikring A/S, Norwegian branch, and
the Norwegian branch of Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S.
Operating ratio
Calculated as the combined ratio plus insurance tech-
nical interest in the denominator.
Claims + insurance operating costs +
profit or loss from reinsurance x 100
Gross premium income + insurance technical interest
Percentage return on equity after tax
Profit for the year after tax x 100
Price/Earnings
Average equity
Share price
Earnings per share
Run-off gains/losses
The difference between the claims provisions at the
beginning of the financial year (adjusted for foreign
currency translation adjustments and discounting ef-
fects) and the sum of the claims paid during the finan-
cial year and that part of the claims provisions at the
end of the financial year pertaining to injuries and
damage occurring in earlier financial years.
Tier 1 capital
Equity less proposed dividend and share of capital
claims in subsidiaries.
Total reserve ratio
Reserve ratio, claims provisions + premium provisions
Solvency II
New solvency requirements for insurance companies
issued by the EU Commission. The new rules comes
into force at 1 January 2016.
Solvency ratio (Solvency I)
Ratio between capital base and weighted assets.
Swedish general insurance
Comprises Tryg Forsikring A/S, Swedish branch, and
the Swedish branch of Tryg Garantiforsikring A/S.
Unwinding
Unwinding of discounting takes place with the
passage of time as the expected time to payment is
reduced. The closer the time of payment, the smaller
the discount. This gradual increase of the provision is
not recognised under claims, but under technical
interest in the income statement.
105
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |
Product overview
Being one of the largest insurance companies in
the Nordic region, Tryg offers a broad range of
insurance products to both private individuals
and businesses. Tryg continuously develops
new products and adapts existing peace of
mind solutions to customer requirements and
developments in society. Also, Tryg focuses
strongly at all times on striking a better balance
between price and risk.
Tryg sells its products primarily via its own sales
channels such as call centres, the Internet, tied
agents, franchisees (Norway), interest organisa-
tions, car dealers, real estate agents, insurance
brokers and Nordea branches. Moreover, Tryg
engages in international cooperation with the AXA
Group. It is an important element of Tryg’s
distribution strategy to be available in places
where customers want it and that most distribu-
tion takes place via the company’s own sales
channels.
Motor insurance
Fire and contents – Commercial
Motor insurance accounts for 31% of total premium income and comprises
mandatory third-party liability insurance providing cover for injuries to a third party
or damage to a third party’s property, and a voluntary comprehensive insurance
policy that provides cover for damage to the customer’s own vehicle from collision,
fire or theft.
Commercial fire and contents insurance, which includes building insurance,
represents 14% of total premium income and covers the loss of or damage to the
buildings, stock or equipment of commercial customers. Moreover, Tryg provides
cover for operating losses in connection with covered claims.
In Denmark, motor insurance taken out by concept customers includes Tryg’s
roadside assistance, such as towing and battery jump-start.
Fire and contents – Private
Fire and contents insurance for private customers represents 24% of total pre-
mium income and includes, for example, house and contents insurance.
House insurance covers damage to properties caused by, for example, fire, storm
or water, legal assistance and the customer’s liability as owner of the property. The
contents insurance covers loss of or damage to private household contents and
covers in and outside of the home. Moreover, the insurance includes liability and
legal assistance, to which can be added a number of supplementary covers, for
example cover of sudden damage and damage to electronic equipment.
Personal accident insurance
Personal accident insurance accounts for 9% of total premium income and covers
accidental bodily injury and death resulting from accidents.
Workers’ compensation insurance
Workers’ compensation insurance accounts for 5% of total premium income and
covers employees against bodily injury sustained at work (in Norway, also occu-
pational diseases). Workers’ compensation insurance is mandatory and covers a
company’s employees (except for public sector employees and persons working
for sole proprietors).
General third-party liability insurance
General third-party liability insurance represents 5% of total premium income
and covers various types of liability, including claims incurred by a company
arising from the conduct of its business or in connection with its products, and
third-party liability for professionals.
Transport insurance
Transport insurance represents 2% of total premium income and covers damage to
goods in transit due to the collision, overturning or crashing of the means of transport.
Compensation takes the form of a lump sum intended to help the customer cope with
the financial consequences of an accident, thereby making their daily lives easier.
The insurance can include a number of supplementary covers, including treatment
by a physiotherapist or chiropractor.
Health insurance
Health insurance represents 2% of total premium income. The insurance covers the
costs of examinations, treatment, medicine, surgery and rehabilitation at a
private health facility.
| Contents – Management’s review
106
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S | Disclaimer
Certain statements in this annual report are based
financial markets, extraordinary events such as
on the beliefs of our management as well as
natural disasters or terrorist attacks, changes in
assumptions made by and information currently
legislation or case law and reinsurance. Should
available to management. Statements regarding
one or more of these risks or uncertainties
Tryg’s future operating results, financial position,
materialise, or should any underlying assumptions
cash flows, business strategy, plans and future
prove to be incorrect, Tryg’s actual financial
objectives other than statements of historical fact
condition or results of operations could
can generally be identified by the use of words
materially differ from that described herein as
such as ‘targets’, ‘believes’, ‘expects’, ‘aims’,
anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.
‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘seeks’, ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘anticipates’,
Tryg is not under any duty to update any of the
‘would’, ‘could’, ‘continues’ or similar expressions.
forward-looking statements or to conform such
statements to actual results, except as may be
A number of different factors may cause the
required by law.
Read more in the chapter
actual performance to deviate significantly
Capital and risk management in the annual
from the forward-looking statements in this
report on page 24-25, and
in Note 1 on
annual report, including but not limited to
page 46, for a description of some of the factors
general economic developments, changes in the
which may affect the Group’s performance or
competitive environ ment, developments in the
the insurance industry.
| Contents – Management’s review
107
Annual report 2015 | Tryg A/S |