Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Industrial Materials / Tsodilo Resources Limited

Tsodilo Resources Limited

tsd.v · TSX-V Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker tsd.v
Exchange TSX-V
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Industrial Materials
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · Tsodilo Resources Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
             Annual Report 2011 

Tsodilo Resources Limited

2011 Annual Report

Tsodilo Resources Limited

  
President’s Message

Dear Shareholders,

On  behalf  of  the  board  of  directors,  I  am  pleased  to 

Our  current  share  capital  consists  of  25,880,970  issued 

provide  the  annual  report  of  Tsodilo  Resources  Limited 

and  outstanding  (31,553,672  on  a  fully  diluted  basis) 

(“Tsodilo”  or  the  “Company”)  recording  the  Company’s 

common  shares.    Tsodilo  has  a  97%  interest  in  our 

progress together with the audited financials for the year 

Botswana  (Newdico  (Pty)  Limited  project  and  a  100% 

ending December 31, 2011. 

interest in our Gcwihaba Resources (Pty) Limited projects.

The  metal  commodity  markets  recovered  signifiantly  in 

The  Company  continues  to  strengthen  our  organization 

2011  and  during  this  period  the  Company  was  able  to 

by  appointments  to  our  board  and  retaining  quality 

complete  the  first  of  its  strategic  objectives  on  its  metal 

professionals on the ground.  We are well positioned for 

mineral  projects.  Phase  1,  reconnaissance  drilling,  was 

the challenges inherent in resource exploration and please 

completed in 2011 and mineralized zones were identified 

follow  our  progress  carefully  and  remained  informed  by 

in several key areas.  The next twelve months will be used 

regular  visits  to  our  website,  www.TsodiloResources.

to refine the geological models and mineralisation styles 

com.

of these targets. 

The  rough  diamonds  also  saw  a  remarkable  upswing  in 

their  prices  but  despite  these  improvements  the  general 

On behalf of the Board,

appetite for greenfields diamond exploration remains low. 

However,  the  Company  will  continue  the  exploration  for 

new  kimberlites  and  complete  the  first-stage  evaluation 

of two of its kimberlites. 

The  privilidged  and  advantageous  position  in  which  the 

Company is finding itself is having two drill rigs  and fully 

equipped    ground  magnetic  teams  on  site    which  means 

that  considerable  progress  has  been  made  with  the 

exploration work program at a  relatively low-cost. 

Sample preparation is ongoing and split cores are sent to 

an accredited laboratory in Johannesburg on a continous 

basis  and  the  turn  around  time  is  generallyless  than 

two    months.  The  newly  acquired  computer  modelling 

program  is  being  updated  continously  as  new  data  and 

Michiel C.J. de Wit, Ph.D. 
President and COO
February 17, 2012

Contents 
President’s Message to Shareholders 

results become available and provides the Company with 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

capabilities to review its geological database in 3D.  

of Financial Results 

Exploration  activites  were  accelerated  in  2011  and  we 

Financial Reporting Responsibility of 

expect this to continue in 2012 as positive results continue 

Management 

to advance our programs.

Auditors’ Report to the Shareholders 

Consolidated Financial Statements / Notes 

Corporate Information 

1 

2 

20

21 

22 

IBC 

1

tsodilo resources limited

Management’s Discussion and Analysis
This  management’s  discussion  and  analysis  (“MD&A”)  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial 

statements of the Company and the notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.  The Company’s 

consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). 

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is United States dollars and all amounts stated are in United States 

dollar unless otherwise noted.   In addition, the Company has two operating subsidiaries, Newdico and Gcwihaba which 

have a functional currency of the Botswana Pula.  This management’s discussion and analysis has been prepared as at 

February 17, 2012.

OVERVIEW
Tsodilo  Resources  Limited  (“Tsodilo”  or  the “Company”)  was  organized  under  the  laws  of  the  Province  of  Ontario  in 

1996 and continued under the laws of the Yukon in 2002. The shares of the Company are listed and posted for trading 

on  the  TSX  Venture  Exchange  under  the  symbol:  TSD.  Tsodilo  is  an  international  diamond  and  metals  exploration 

company  with  majority  interests  in  kimberlite  and  metals  exploration  projects  in  northwest  Botswana. The  Company 

has not yet determined whether these properties contain reserves that can be economically mined.  As an exploration 

stage company, the recoverability of amounts shown for exploration expenditures is dependent upon the discovery of 

reserves that can be economically mined, the securing and maintenance of the interests in the properties, the ability 

of  the  Company  to  obtain  the  necessary  financing  to  complete  the  development,  and  future  production  or  proceeds 

from the disposition thereof. The Company is also actively reviewing additional diamond and base and precious metal 

opportunities within southern Africa.

Corporate

At a special meeting of the holders of common shares of the Company held on April 9, 2002 shareholders approved a 

restructuring of the Company that incorporated the sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets. The assets were 

transferred  in  settlement  on  debt  due  of  $612,783  and  owing  to  Trans  Hex  Group  Limited  (“Trans  Hex  Group”),  the 

principal shareholder and creditor of the Company prior to restructuring.  The Company retained an interest in all future 

dividends  that  may  be  paid  by  either  Northbank  Diamonds  Limited,  Hoanib  Diamonds  (Proprietary)  Limited  or Trans 

Hex (Zimbabwe) Limited. In addition, the Company was released from the long-term loans due to Trans Hex Group by 

the subsidiaries being sold, of $3,341,690, and Trans Hex Group agreed to return the 10,688,137 common shares in the 

capital  of  the  Company,  representing  73.22%  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  the  Company  at  that  time,  to 

treasury for cancellation. The special meeting of shareholders also approved the discontinuance of the Company from 

the Province of Ontario and its continuance under the Business Corporations Act (Yukon), the change of name of the 

Company from Trans Hex International Ltd. to Tsodilo Resources Limited, the election of new directors and the repeal of 

the existing stock option plan of the Company and adoption of a new stock option plan. Following the restructuring of 

the Company, as approved by shareholders in April 2002, Tsodilo has no long-term debt.

Outstanding Share Data

As  of  February  17,  2012,  25,880,970  common  shares  of  the  Company  were  outstanding.    Of  the  options  to  purchase 

common  shares  issued  to  eligible  persons  under  the  stock  option  plan  of  the  Company,  2,970,000  options  remain 

outstanding of which 2,455,000 are exercisable at exercise prices ranging from CAD $0.55 - $2.23. 

As of February 17, 2012, 2,702,702 warrants are outstanding. The warrants were issued by way of the private placements 

utilized  by  the  Company  for  financing  purposes.  Each  warrant  entitles  the  holder  thereof  to  purchase  one  common 

share of the Company at purchase price of from Canadian $2.17 for a period of five years from the date of issuance (with 

3.5 years remaining). If all warrants were converted, 2,702,702 common shares of the Company would be issued.

2

tsodilo resources limited

Principal Shareholders of the Company

The principal shareholders of the Company as of February 17, 2012 are as follows: 

Name

Description

Preston Trust

Private Investment Vehicle

International Finance Corporation

Division of the World Bank

David J. Cushing

James M. Bruchs 

Subsidiaries

Director

Director 

Shares   -  Owns, 
Controls or Directs
4,996,065

% of the Issued and 
Outstanding Shares
19.30%

2,702,702

2,460,501 

2,187,619

10.44%

  9.50%

  8.45%

The Company has a 97% operating interest in its Botswana subsidiary, Newdico (Proprietary) Limited (“Newdico”), which 

holds nine prospecting licenses covering approximately 3,949 square kilometers in northwest Botswana on which there 

is  encouragement  for  the  existence  of  undiscovered  kimberlites  in  at  least  three  separate  areas  of  the  property.  The 

Company’s  minority  partner  (3%)  in  this  project,  Trans  Hex  Group,  is  an  established  South  African  diamond  mining 

company.

The Company has a 100% interest in its wholly owned Botswana subsidiary, Gcwihaba Resources (Proprietary) Limited 

(“Gcwihaba”),  which  has  six  diamond  prospecting  licenses  covering  approximately  4,456  square  kilometers,  eighteen  

metals (base, precious, platinum group, and rare earth) licenses covering 4,618 square kilometers and eight radioactive 

minerals licenses covering 6,927 square kilometers.

The Company holds a 100% interest in Tsodilo Resources Bermuda Limited to which the shares of its operating subsidiaries, 

Newdico and Gcwihaba, are registered.  

1.  Diamond Projects

Exploration activities for the year 2011

The company holds 15 Prospecting licences (8 0612.2 km²) under the names of  local companies Newdico (Pty) Ltd. and 

Gcwihaba Resources (Pty) Ltd for precious stones (Table 1). The Company continued with its exploration program during 

2011  whilst  shifting  its  focus  to  the  north  of  the  existing  Nxau  Nxau  kimberlites  cluster.  This  is  based  on  geological 

interpretation of the Southern African Magnetotelluric Experiment (SAMTEX) project which indicates that the Angolan 

Craton  extends  and  thickens  northwards. This  MT  data  images  the  three-dimensional  regional-scale  geometry  of  the 

electrical  conductivity  of  the  continental  lithosphere  below  southern  Africa.  The  results  of  this  program  has  among 

others shown that the Company’s northern licences are underlain by the Angolan Craton (Muller and Jones 2007) and 

this suggests that kimberlites occurring in the most northern licences should be the most interesting from a diamond 

perspective.

Furthermore,  the  mineral  chemistry  of  the  indicator  minerals  from  the  known  kimberlites  suggests  that  the  interest 

rating also improves to the north. 

3

tsodilo resources limited

Table 1.  Summary of the Company’s prospecting permits for precious stones

NEWDICO DIAMOND LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

Rental Fee 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

Work 
Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

PL 62/2005
PL 63/2005

PL 64 /2005

PL 65/2005

PL 66/2005

PL 67/2005

PL 68/2005

PL 69 /2005
PL 71/2005

797
718

851

194

621

229

220

181
138

7/01/10
7/01/10

7/01/10

7/01/10

7/01/10

7/01/10

7/01/10

7/01/10
7/01/10

7/01/12
7/01/12

7/01/12

7/01/12

7/01/12

7/01/12

7/01/12

7/01/12
7/01/12

2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal

2nd Renewal

2nd Renewal

2nd Renewal

2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal

3,985
3,590

4,255

970

3,105

1.145

1,100
905
690

200,000
200,000

200,000

200,000

200,000

200,000

200,000
200,000
200,000

407,970
407,180

408,510

401,940

406,210

402,290

402,200
401,810
401,380

53,545
53,4410

53,616

52,753

53,314

52,799

52,787
52,736
52,680

TOTAL

3,949

19,745

1,800,000

3,639,490

477,676

GCWIHABA DIAMOND LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

Rental Fee 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

Work 
Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

PL 46/2008
PL 47/2008

PL 49/2008

PL 641/2009

709
491

710

923

6/01/11
6/01/11

1/01/11

7/01/09

1/01/13
1/01/13

1/01/13

7/01/12

1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal

Initial Grant

3,545
2,455

3,550

4,615

PL 642/2009

839

7/01/09

7/01/12

Initial Grant

4,195

Pl 643/2009

786

7/01/09

7/01/12

Initial Grant

3,930

70,000
70,000

70,000

1) 70,000

2) 80,000

3) 90,000

1) 70,000
2) 80,000

3) 90,000

1) 70,000

2) 80,000
3) 90,000

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

147,090
144,910

147,100

19,305
19,019

19,306

253,845

33,316

252,585

33,151

251,790

33,046

TOTAL

4,456

22,290

930,000

1,197,320

157,146

The  interest  level  remains  as  there  are  two  major  unexplained  surface  concentrations  of  both  diamonds  and  high-

interest (G10) garnets across the border in Namibia – the Tsumkwe and the Omatako targets. It has been suggested that 

the diamonds and garnets from these targets have been derived from diamond-bearing kimberlites in the licence blocks 

presently held by the Company to the east. 

4

tsodilo resources limited

The Company’s kimberlites in the Nxau Nxau field, just east of the Botswana/Namibia border, are situated in the regional 

headwaters of the palaeo-drainages which generally feed these anomalies. The Company has therefore been working 

through the existing kimberlite database in order to match  the mineral chemistry of the indicator minerals of these two 

anomalies with those from kimberlites in the Nxau Nxau cluster. 

In  addition,  the  geophysical  data  of  the  area  covered  by  the  Precious  Stones  licences  were  subjected  to  a  rigorous 

review  by  a  very  reputable  geophysical  company,  specialised  in  kimberlites,  in  order  to  identify  any  other  kimberlite 

targets for drilling. Not only have more first-grade targets been identified within and immediately around the existing 

cluster,  other  targets  have  also  been  identified  in  the  northern  licence  blocks  that  warrant  detailed  ground  work  and 

drilled scheduled for 2012. During the year, two targets were drilled – TOD 12 and K19. Both recovered kimberlite from 

the drilling but based on the petrography it has been downgraded in terms of its diamond potential and no further work 

is planned for these bodies. 

The review of the petrography, mineral chemistry, micro-diamond and geophysical databases of the known kimberlites  

in the Nxau Nxau field is on-going. This review resulted in the decision to submit samples of the three most interesting 

pipes (K4 – PD07, K10 – B5, K20 – A15) in terms of size and mineral chemistry, for micro-diamond work in order to obtain 

a first-pass grade valuation for these bodies. Core samples from three kimberlites were submitted for micro-diamond 

analyses  to  the  Geo-analytical  Laboratories  Diamond  Services  of  the  Saskatchewan  Research  Council.   The  results  are 

summarised in Table 2. 

Table 2. Micro-diamond results 

Kimberlite

K4 (PD07/2)

K10 (B5)

K20 (A15/5)

Total

Kg

208.85

228.65

183.80

621.30

Stones

Carats

Stones/tonne

2

14

0

16

0.000970

0.000955

0.000000

0.001925

9.58

61.23

0.00

Only K10, which produced 14 micro-diamonds, will require further work. Additional samples will be submitted in order 

to obtain additional diamonds in order to construct a grade estimate. At the same time samples from K11, proximate to 

K10 will also be submitted for microdiamond analyses. 

Diamond exploration activities for 2012 will therefore focus on the microdiamond results of K10 and presumably K11 and 

also on targets generated from the Airborne Magnetic Geophysical surveys in the Company’s most northern Prospecting 

permits PL 46, 47 and 49/2008. 

2.  Metals (Base and Precious, Platinum Group Metals, and Rare Earth Elements) Projects

The Company’s Prospecting Licences have evolved with time into a package which covers some 12,110 km² (Table 2a). 

Most  of  the  ground  has  been  covered  by  the  1st  drilling  phase  which  was  completed  during  the  3rd  Quarter  of  2011 

(Phase 1). The main objective of this phase was to cover the ground on a wide grid to identify the areas of interest for 

more  detailed  follow-up  work  scheduled  during  Phase  2.  So  far  the  drilling  has  returned  mineralised  rocks  in  several 

parts of the licence area representing a variety of geological settings with different mineralisation styles. 

The  Company’s  exploration  work  had  initially  indicated  that  the  sulphide-rich  Matchless  Amphibolite  Belt  (‘MAB’) 

traverse the Company’s southern licences in north-west Botswana, in an area where the Damara Belt links up with the 

Lufilian Arc. In addition more recent petrology, geochemistry and geochronology work by AEON’s research group has 

highlighted the presence of Archean granite-gneisses (ca. 2550 Ma) in Ngamiland.

5

tsodilo resources limited

 
Table 2a.  Summary of the Company’s Prospecting Licences for metals

GCWIHABA – METAL LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

Rental Fee 
Per Annum
(BWP)

Work 
Program
Per Annum 
(BWP)

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

PL 118/2005
PL 119/2005

PL 051/2008

PL 052/2008

PL 386/2008

PL 387/2008

PL 388/2008

PL 389/2008

PL 390/2008

PL 391/2008

PL 392/2008

PL 393/2008

PL 394/2008

PL 395/2008

PL 595/2009

PL 596/2009

PL  5972009
PL 588/2009

367
827

487

382

570

965

318

979

808

455

829

938

650

972

320

925

514
796

10/01/10
10/01/10

07/01/11

07/01/11

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

01/01/12

07/01/09

07/01/09

07/01/09
07/01/09

10/01/12
10/01/12

07/01/13

07/01/13

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

01/01/14

07/01/12

07/01/12

07/01/12
07/01/12

2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
1st  Renewal

1st  Renewal

1st  Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal
1st Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal

1st Renewal

Initial Grant

Initial Grant

Initial Grant
Initial Grant

1,835
4,135

2,435

1,910

2,850

4,825

1,590
4,895

4,040

2,275

4,145

4,690

3,250

4,860

1,600

4,625

2,570
3,980

100,000
100,000

70,000

70,000

100,000

100,000

100,000
100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000
100,000

203,670
208,270

144,870

143,820

205,700

209,650

203,180
209,790

208,080

204,550

208,290

209,380

206,500

209,720

304,800

313,875

307,710
311,940

26,732
27,335

19,014

18,876

26,998

27,517

26,667
27,535

27,311

26,847

27,338

27,481

27,103

27,526

40,005

41,196

40,387
40,942

TOTAL

12,102

60,510

4,013,795

526,810

This  is  the  first  time  that  Archean  basement  rocks  have  been  discovered  in  this  north-western  part  of  Botswana. This 

development  also supports the geophysical magnetic  work that has been conducted in the region and  identified the 

presence  of  the  Angolan  Craton.    Paleoproterozoic  granites  (ca.  2000  Ma),  which  have  been  tectonically  interlayered 

with Pan-African meta-sediments (including graphitic schist, carbonates, diamictites and meta-basites ca. 540 Ma), have 

also  been  dated.  These  tectonic  contacts  and  graphitic  schists  are  mineralized  and  have  been  targeted  for        further 

work.  The  2  billion  year  old  granites  can  be  correlated  either  with  the  nearby  Quangwadum  and  Okwa  Complex  in 

Botswana,  suggesting  the  possibility  of  a  large  cryptic  mineralized  mafic  intrusion  in  the  region,  or  with  the  Kibaran 

granitic basement (ca. 2050 Ma) to the Katangan Supergroup beneath the Lufilian Arc in the DRC. 

A minimum age for the diamictites intersected in the northern part of the project area was established at 743 Ma by our 

academic partners AEON (Witbooi 2011). This is an important age as it aligns itself directly with the Grand Conglomerate in 

the Copper Belt in Zambia and Chuos Formation in Namibia. This links the meta-sedimentary sequence in NW Ngamiland 

directly with these two mineral provinces.  Finally, the Pan African meta-basites in Ngamiland yield an age of ca. 535 Ma. 

This age is younger than the metabasalts of MAB and Katanga (ca. 765 Ma), but similar to the age of peak metamorphism 

and deformation in the MAB and Lufilian Arc (ca. 530 Ma) and the Pan-African granites in Namibia and the Hook Rhyolite in 

Zambia. The difference between metabasalts in Katanga and the Ngamiland meta-basites can  be accounted for through 

the higher degrees of Pan African deformation and metamorphism found in Ngamiland (e.g. the new age is a tectonically 

6

tsodilo resources limited

reset age rather than a magmatic age) and/or that the metabasalts of Ngamiland represent subducted basaltic MAB-like 

oceanic crust that has been recycled as island-arc basalts. Either way, the new dates strengthen the previous suggestions 

by Tsodilo of a correlation between the mineralized Pan African rocks and basement in Nagamiland with those in the 

Central African Copper Belt, and those in the MAB. Work with AEON is on-going to refine the geological models.

The presence of massive magnetite units in the northern part of the area and the copper and gold showings east of the 

banded  magnetite  and  associated  with  meta-basic  rocks  (epidote-scapolite-albite  amphibolite)  in  the  central  part  of 

the area, indicates that the mineralization model of Ngamiland can be associated with an Iron Oxide Copper Gold ore 

deposit (IOCG), also referred to as the Ngamiland IOCG. 

The main activities during the year were driven by ground geophysical surveys and diamond drilling. The former is to 

upgrade  and  focus  the  regional  geophysical  dataset  for  more  accurate  drill  positions  on  the  various  targets,  and  the 

latter as a continuation of the first-phase drilling program.

During the year 7,362 line-kilometers of ground magnetic data was collected. This was leveled and interpreted by the 

Company’s in-house geophysical unit. This represents a coverage of some 264 km² on a 50-meter line spacing. During 

the year an additional walk-magnetometer was purchased in order to increase the coverage. These data was successfully 

used to position new drill holes on the often magnetic (due to the presence of pyrrhotite in the meta-sediments) zones 

identified as conductors from the electromagnetic data (EM). 

In 2011, 36 diamond drill holes were completed to a cumulative depth of 9,242.44 meters and 7, 635.72 meters of core 

was  recovered  (Table  3). The  Company’s  new  drill  rig,  which  was  commissioned  and  started  operating  during  the  3rd 

Quarter of the year, drilled 9 holes of the total to a cumulative depth of 1,574.7m and produced 1,096.9m of core. The 

objective of the Phase 1 drilling program was to cover all the prospecting licenses on a wide grid in order to identify 

potential mineralized deposits that are to be covered with detailed ground geophysics and follow-up drilling during the 

Phase 2 of the program. This latter phase started at the end of the 3rd Quarter in 2011. 

Rock  samples  from  approximately  50  boreholes  were  submitted  to  independent  parties  and  177  petrographic  thin 

sections;  9  polished  sections;  11  SEM  images;  36  XRF  analyses;  and  5  samples  were  subject  to  geochronological  age 

testing and reported on. 

Table 3. Holes drilled in 2011 during the reconnaissance Phase 1 drilling program

Borehole 
Number

Drilled (m)

Total 
Core(m)

Main Lithology

L9570/3

L9570/4

L9560/2

L9540/1

L9590/6

L9600/10

L9600/11

L9600/12

L9600/13

L9650/8

L9670/10

L9700/10

L9620/3

L9620/4

L9610/13

170.8

356.0

308.62

300.5

214.5

268.5

252.9

370.0

350.42

251.6

305.4

98.5

152.5

335.5

187.5

136.8 Meta-pelite; dirty carbonate

321.6

Schist; dirty carbonate

293.62 Meta-pelite; dirty carbonate; dolomite

239.9

157.9

264.5

231.3

358.0

332.0

214.9

Schist

Schist; meta-pelite

Banded magnetite; BIF; schist; dirty carb

Banded magnetite; schist

Banded magnetite; schist

Schist; meta-pelite; dolomite

Banded magnetite: schist 

284.0 Gneiss; schist; meta-pelite; dirty carb

11.7

 Black shales

110.5

295.5

133.5

Schist, carbonate – hole abandoned

Schist; meta-basite; meta-pelite

Schists, carbonates, meta-pelitic schists

7

tsodilo resources limited

 
Table 3 continued

L9600/14

L9600/15

L9610/14

PL 394/3

Pl 395/1

1822 C50

1822 C51
1822 C27/2
2021B10
2021B11
TOD12
1822 C27/3
1822 C27/5
K19
1821 B53
1821 B53/1
1821 B61
1821 B61/1
1821 B64
1821 B63
1821 B58

Total 

195.5

401.5

401.5

380.6

159.9

425.6

119.0
381.4
211.4
176.4
122.3
377.4
297.0
138.3 
 75.5
101.3 
86.5 
350.5 
312.5
302.5
302.6
9, 242.44

141.5

346.5

Black shales

Black shales; schist

351.6 Dolomite, mineralised schists

307.4 Amphibolite, gneiss, 

102.1 Granite

383.0 Gneissic schist; 

74.0 Granite schist
Skarn  
Red sandstone
Red sandstone

326.4
123.5
92.4
98.3 Dwyka diamictite with kimberlites sill/dyke

Schist, meta-basite, carbonate
Schist, meta-basite 

330.1
261 
98.4  Kimberlite
33.5  Abadoned hole  
86.3  Magnetite schist, garnet-magnetite 

8.5  Granitic schist

309.0
247.0
259.5
270.0
7, 635.72

Schist; diamictite 
Schist
Schist; diamictite 
Schist; diamictite

Laboratory  services  for  the  assaying  of  core  samples  were  obtained  from  ALS  Minerals  in  Johannesburg,  South  Africa  

and Scientific Services CC in Cape Town, South Africa . During the year 14, 671 samples were assayed using a variety of 

methods as listed in Table 4.

Table 4.  Assay results received during the year 2011

LABORATORY

ME ICP61 
(Major 
elements)

PGM 
ICP23 (Au/
Pt/Pd)

ME 
MS81 
(REE)

ME 
ICP81 
(Si)

ME 
OG62 
(Fe)

ICP AES 
(Au/Pd/
Pt/ Ag/Fe/
Mn)

ICP AES 
(Ag/Fe/
Mn)

ICP 
AES 
(REE)

Total

ALS
Scientifi c  Services

Total

5,400

5 ,171

1,389

675

21

1,651

162

202

12,656
2,015

14,671

The exploration program of Phase 1 has identified three different geological domains with different mineralization styles 

that are targeted for a Phase 2 follow-up program. These are:

1.  Xaudum BIF Magnetite deposit

The northern part of the area is underlain by the very strong Xaudum BIF magnetic anomaly lying in an almost north-

south orientation. Recent drilling has intersected multiple layers of magnetite in schist units. Assay results for selected 

intersections of the three boreholes drilled on the layered magnetic BIF rocks are listed in Table 5. These are the averages 

of the various intersections based on 1 meter samples. Iron values of well over 35% have been intersected repeatedly 

over  tens  of  meters.    Petrographically,  most  of  the  opaque  minerals  are  magnetite.  In  shallower  samples  of  borehole 

L9600/11 some of the magnetite is replaced by hematite. 

The  assay  results  are  encouraging  and  indicate  extensive  mineralization  associated  with  the  ground  geophysics.  The 

Phase 2 drilling program has been initiated and will provide more details on the extent of this deposit. 

Average  assay  values  over  selected  intersection  based  on  1  meter  samples  for  three  bore  holes  on  the  Xuadum  BIF 

Magnetite deposit are set forth in Table 5.  (Note that the assay results in hole L9600/12 reported as 50% + have been 

leveled at 50% until the ME OG62 results become available).

8

tsodilo resources limited

L9600/10

L9600/11

L9600/12

From (m)

139
144
192
38
62
118
29
29
67
67
97
137
171
171
183
229
302
356

To (m)
183
164
232
105
105
169
56
41
86
78
121
152
200
180
200
346
346
370

TABLE 5

Intersection (m)

45
21
41
68
44
52
28
13
20
12
24
16
30
10
18
118
45
15

Fe%
40.87
45.41
35.23
39.77
42.63
40.05
35.51
38.07
39.44
43.81
37.30
34.72
39.27
41.46
41.42
40.74
45.88
40.01

Al2O3%
1.13
0.64
1.74
1.13
1.12
1.14
0.97
0.61
1.74
0.93
2.01
2.48
1.15
0.82
0.88
0.91
0.84
0.86

SiO2%
24.42
21.35
30.70
25.75
26.84
27.42
26.01
26.49
29.97
25.22
29.12
30.32
28.12
33.46
23.61
26.68
25.06
30.35

P%

0.34
0.36
0.31
0.34
0.34
0.32
0.28
0.27
0.34
0.35
0.34
0.37
0.34
0.34
0.36
0.29
0.32
0.25

In  addition  to  the  presence  of  iron  mainly  in  the  form  of  magnetite,  anomalous  values  of  Co, V  and Ti  have  also  been 

acquired using the Company’s hand-held XRF unit on outcrop samples.  

2.  The Central Shale Basin

Central to the license area is the Central Shale Basin. Most of the mineralized zones are conductive and visible on the 

regional  electro-magnetic  survey  flown  on  behalf  of  the  government  of  Botswana.  Subsequent  drilling  during  Phase 

1 recovered meta-sediments (pelites, shales, carbonates, evaporites and arenites) that are dipping steeply to the east. 

Comparison of the main lithologies and evidence from recently acquired radiometric ages leaves little doubt that these 

rocks  are  an  extension  of  the  stratiform  Cu-Co  province  of  the  central  African  Copperbelt  in  Zambia  and  Democratic 

Republic of Congo.

Sediments are mainly composed of black shales, meta-pelites, meta-arenites, and dolomites, with interbedded evaporites. 

Most lithologies are mineralisased with pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalco-pyrite.

Analysis of the geophysics combined with the lithological and assay information of the various boreholes in on going 

and will direct Phase 2 of the project. 

3.  Skarn Deposit

In the south of the Central Shale Basin are zones of mineralisation associated with skarn deposits. These are related to 

massive magnetite, meta-basites, meta-mafic units and granofels in contact with carbonates and meta-sediments. 

The meta-basites at 1822C26/1 were dated at 535 Ma and have been interpreted as subducted tholeiitic oceanic crust 

which  has  been  rejuvenated  before  being  extruded  as  island  arc  alkaline  magmas  (Gaisford  2010). These  rocks  are  of 

similar age to the Pan African granites in Namibia and the Hook Rhyolite in the Zambian Copper Belt. Mineralization here 

is characterized by Cu and Fe (Table 6) with elevated values of Ni (234 ppm Ni between 116.6 and 126.6 m in borehole 

1822C26/1, peaking at 564 ppm), Au (0.02 ppm), Ag (2.3 ppm), Ti and some REE (La and Ce). 

9

tsodilo resources limited

1822C26/1

1822C27/2

Table 6.  Average assay values over selected intersection based on 
1 meter samples for two bore holes on the Skarn deposit.

From (m)

77.6
99.6
116.6
129.6
152.6
177.6
4
16
69
83
95
104
137
152
157

To (m)

80.6
105.6
126.6
136.6
162.6
180.6
7
21
73
89
101
109
148
153
162

Intersection (m)
3
6
10
7
10
3
4
6
5
7
7
6
12
2
6

Cu (ppm)

1,103
1,057
684
846
2,088
1,846
831
636
728
649
1,055
944
440
1,575
1,282

Fe (%)

13.04
13.39
4.38
7.31
13.5
8.71
12.64
12.84
21.58
30.51
25.58
43.63
40.66
37.15
24.48

The  copper  and  iron  showings  of  these  rocks  associated  with  meta-basites  (epidote-scapolite-albite  amphibolite)  on 

the central part of the area suggests that the mineralization model of these deposits could be associated with an Iron 

Oxide Copper Gold ore deposit (IOCG). The strong relationship of the Cu and Fe with kicks in the Au and Ag support this 

model and it may suggest, also based on the airborne geophysical data, that the sulphide-rich Matchless Amphibolite 

Belt (‘MAB’) traverse the Company’s licences south of the shale basin.

4.  Radioactive licenses

The  Company  was  granted  six  prospecting  permits  for  radioactive  minerals  through  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary 

Gcwihaba Resources (Pty) Ltd in the north-west of Botswana directly west of the Okavango River in 2011. The additional 

area covers some 5687 km² (Table 7). The total area that the Company has secured for radioactive minerals is 7116.8 km² 

(Table 7) and overlaps with some of the Newdico diamond and Gcwihaba base metal permits. 

Table 7. Prospecting Licences held by Gcwihaba 

GCWIHABA – RADIOACTIVE LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

Pl 150/2010

719

07/01/10

07/01/13

Initial Grant

Rental Fee Per 
Annum  (BWP)
3,595

PL 151/2010

711

07/01/10

07/01/13

Initial Grant

3,555

PL 045/2011

1,000

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

5,000

PL 046/2011

847

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,235

PL 047/2011

907

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,535

PL 048/2011

769

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

3,845

PL 049/2011

974

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,870

PL 050/2011

1,000

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

TOTAL

6,927

5,000

34,635

Work Program Per 
Annum (BWP)
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

190,785

25,040

190,665

25,024

195,000

25,593

192,705

25,292

193,605

25,410

191,535

25,139

194,610

25,542

195,000

25,593

1,543,905

202,633

10

tsodilo resources limited

The company is reviewing the exploration results from Union Carbide Exploration Corporation who had secured many 

prospecting licences in west and north-west Botswana for uranium. Their exploration program in north-west Botswana 

(Ngamiland) started in 1977 and continued until 1980, and of particular interest are their findings of anomalous uranium 

within what they called the Kkhaudum and Chadum palaeo-drainages covered by their Prospecting Licences 4/79, 5/79, 

3/80, 4/80 and 5/80. 

High counts of uranium in both calcrete and water samples and anomalous counts of vanadium from the water samples 

were  obtained.  Up  to  30  meter  thick  valley  calcrete  (the  target  calcrete)  were  drilled  with  geochemical  anomalous 

concentration of uranium in certain trap environments, However, at the time no ore-bodies were delineated, but Union 

Carbide concluded “that there is definitely uranium in the system as is evident by some very high uranium contents in 

the water samples” (Union Carbide Final report 1980 by DJ Jack). 

The Company’s strategy is two-fold. Firstly it is to conduct a geomorphological study of the area using remote sensing 

techniques with field checking. This is to be linked to buried palaeo-channels of Tertiary age that have been identified 

by geophysics while interpreting the most recent government Airborne Magnetic data in the search for kimberlites on 

overlapping Newdico diamond prospecting licences.  Secondly, recent diamond drilling conducted by Gcwihaba mainly 

on  the  eastern  part  of  the  licences  have  returned  anomalous  uranium  assay  results  in  some  of  the  Proterozoic  meta-

sedimentary units underlying the Kalahari Group sediments. 

During the year, 7,001 samples were assayed for Uranium using the ME ICP61, ME MS81 (both in the ALS Laboratory in 

Johannesburg)  and  ICP  AES  (in  the  Scientific  Services  Laboratory  in  Cape Town)  geochemical  assay  techniques. These 

samples were derived from 29 boreholes drilled during the Phase 1 program. 

The results from borehole L9640/2 (100 ppm U) in black shales, and 1822D12/3 (40 ppm U) from meta-pelites, have been 

encouraging.  Research  in  the  understanding  of  the  link  between  these  anomalous  meta-sedimentary  rocks  and  the 

surface uranium anomalies in the Kalahari calcretes is on-going. 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As at December 31, 2011, the Company had a working capital of $80,446 [Deficiency at December 2010: ($2,569,273)], 

which  included  cash  and  equivalents  $1,505,965,  (December  2010:  $2,728,695).  These  funds  are  managed  in-house 

in  accordance  with  specific  investment  criteria  approved  by  the  board  of  directors,  the  primary  objective  being  the 

preservation  of  capital  to  assure  funding  for  exploration  activities. The  Company  had  exercises  of  warrants  related  to 

private placements for additional cash proceeds of $516,713, $150,979, $148,728, and $1,110,217 on February 26, 2011, 

June 8, 2011, August 15, 2011, and December 22, 2011 respectively, see discussion in Financing Activities below.  The 

Company  does  not  hedge  its  activities.  At  year  end,  the  Company  did  not  have  any  material  contractual  obligations 

except for minimum spending requirements on exploration licenses. The Company is required to spend a minimum on 

prospecting over the period of its licenses. On licenses current as of December 31, 2011, the expenditure requirements 

inclusive of license fees from the date of grant to and if held to their full term are as follows:  

Project Description

Required Expenditure

Newdico – Diamond 
Gcwihaba - Diamond
Gcwihaba -  Metals
Gcwihaba - Radioactive Minerals

BWP
3,639,490
1,197,320
4,013,795
1,543,905

USD
$477,676
$157,145
$526,810
$202,633

Financial Instruments

The  carrying  amounts  reflected  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  for  cash  and  equivalents,  accounts  receivable  and 

accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these instruments. 

The Company’s warrants are classified as derivative liabilities and are recorded at their estimated fair value. The liability 

recognized  at  December  31,  2011  for  the  warrants  is  $1,500,766  (December  2010:  $5,266,191).  The  Company  is  not 

11

tsodilo resources limited

required to pay cash to the holders of the warrants to settle this liability.  Due to the nature of the Company’s operations, 

there is no significant credit or interest rate risk.

Operating Activities

Cash outflow used in operating activities before working capital adjustment increased from $413,859 for the year ended 

December  31,  2010  to  $521,422  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2011.  The  increase  was  due  primarily  to  corporate 

remuneration,  investor  relations,  legal  and  audit,  filing  fees,  and  administrative  expenses,  which  were  greater  in  2011 

than 2010.  

Annual Information 
(in US Dollars)

Net income (loss) for the year

Basic income (loss) per share
Basic diluted income (loss) per share
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

Basic comprehensive income (loss) per share
Diluted comprehensive income (loss) per share

Total assets
Total long term liabilities
Cash dividend

Quarterly Information 
(in US Dollars)
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2010
Net income (loss)  for the year

Basic income (loss) per share
Diluted basic income (loss) per share
Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

Basic comprehensive income (loss) for the year
Diluted comprehensive income (loss) per share

Total assets
Total long term liabilities

Quarterly Information 
(in US Dollars)
Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2011
Net income (loss)  for the year

Basic income (loss) per share
Diluted basic income (loss) per share
Comprehensive income (loss) for the year

Basic comprehensive income (loss) for the year
Diluted comprehensive income (loss) per share

Total assets
Total long term liabilities

Investing Activities

Fiscal Year
December 31, 2011

Fiscal Year
December 31, 2010

$1,719,246 
$0.07 
$0.07 
($1,810,035)
($90,789)
$0.00 
$0.00 
$11,477,912 
-

($233,146)
($0.01)
($0.01)
$335,407 
$111,901 
$0.01 
$0.01 
$11,481,978 
-

-

-

Quarter 1

Quarter 2

Quarter 3

Quarter 4

($5,389,372)
($0.28)
($0.28)
($5,464,797)
($0.29)
($0.29)
$5,928,143 
-

$1,270,083 
$0.05 
$0.04 
$968,877 
$0.04 
$0.04 
$10,577,211 
-

$2,062,846 
$0.10 
$0.13 
$2,550,863 
$0.13 
$0.11 
$11,109,568 
-

$1,823,297 
$0.12 
$0.10 
($2,056,958)
($0.12)
($0.14)
$11,481,978 
-

Quarter 1

Quarter 2

Quarter 3

Quarter 4

$1,405,616 
$0.05 
$0.05 
$937,594 
$0.04 
$0.03 
$11,454,205 
-

$128,486 
$0.01 
$0.01 
$262,444 
$0.01 
$0.01 
$11,751,730 
-

($457,653)
($0.02)
($0.02)
($1,169,022)
($0.01)
($0.01)
$11,066,456 
-

$642,797 
$0.03 
$0.03 
($121,805)
($0.04)
($0.03)
$11,477,912 
-

Cash flow applied in investing activities decreased to $2,520,331 for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2010: $2,671,002).

Total expenditures of $2,270,342 on exploration properties for the year ended December 31, 2011 were attributable to 

the Newdico and Gcwihaba projects in northwest Botswana. Included in this amount is the proportionate contributory 

share, ranging from 3.55% to 2.89% attributed to the Trans Hex Group for the Newdico project. Trans Hex Group has a 3% 

interest for funding the expenses of Newdico. There were no material disposals of capital assets or investments during 

the year.

Financing Activities

Following the restructuring of Tsodilo in April 2002 and the cancellation of the shares formerly held by Trans Hex, the 

source of financing for the Company’s activities changed from debt (related party) financing to equity, through the issue 

12

tsodilo resources limited

 
of  units  by  way  of  non-brokered  private  placements.  Each  unit  has  consisted  of  one  common  share  of  the  Company 

and  one  or  one-half  a  warrant  with  each  full  such  warrant  entitling  the  holder  to  purchase  one  common  share  of  the 

Company for a purchase price equal to the unit price for a period of two to five years from the date of issuance.

During the year ended December 31 2011, the Company received gross proceeds in the amount of  $1,926,547 from the 

exercise of Warrants related to private placements. 

Private Placement Date

No. of Units

Price per Unit

Proceeds

None

Warrant Exercise Date
February 26, 2011

June 8, 2011

August 15, 2011

December 22, 2011

--

No. of Shares
728,061

210,894

201,519

2,093,156

--

Price per Share
C$0.70

C$0.70

C$0.70

C$0.55

--

Proceeds
$516,713

$150,979

$148,728

$1,110,217

Tsodilo expects to raise the amounts required to fund its 97% share of the Newdico project, the Gcwihaba projects and 

corporate general and administration expenses, by way of non-brokered private placements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
On a consolidated basis, Tsodilo recorded net income of $1,719,246 for the year ended December 31, 2011 ($0.07 cents 

per common share) compared to a net loss of ($223,146) for the year ended December, 2010 [($0.01) cents per common 

share]. Although the Company experienced an increase in remuneration and administration reflecting general corporate 

activity,  it  was  offset  by  unrealized  gains  on  warrants.    The  decrease  in  stock  option  expense  reflects  fewer  option 

granted and changes to share price. The unrealized gain on warrants increased from $671,515 in 2010 to $2,673,378 in 

2011.

Cumulative  exploration  expenditures  including  amortization  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  used  in  exploration 

activities on all projects amounted to $8,774,657 as at December 31, 2011 compared to $7,493,891 as at December 31, 

2010.  Cumulative exploration expenditures incurred on the Newdico project as at December 31, 2011 was $6,291,558 

compared to $6,057,490 as at December 31, 2010. The principal components of the Newdico exploration program were: 

(a) additional soil sampling and the completion of the processing and analysis of the soil samples; (b) commissioning of 

further ground magnetic surveys of selected aeromagnetic anomalies; (c) analyzing detailed proprietary aeromagnetic 

maps  covering  the  target  areas;  and  (d)  commencement  of  a  diamond  core  drilling  program  on  selected  targets. 

Cumulative  exploration  expenditures  incurred  on  Gcwihaba’s  projects  as  at  December  31,  2011  were  $2,483,099 

compared to $1,436,401 as at December 31, 2010.

PERSONNEL
At December 31, 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries employed thirty-five (35) individuals compared to twenty-six 

(26)  at  December  31,  2010,  including  senior  officers,  administrative  and  operations  personnel  including  those  on  a 

short-term service basis.

FOURTH QUARTER - 2011
The fourth quarter was a normal operating period for a quarter.   Operating expenses were at normal levels for the fourth 

quarter of the year.  

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Operations  of  the  Company  are  speculative  due  to  the  high  risk  nature  of  its  business  which  includes  acquisition, 

financing, exploration and development of diamond and metal properties (collectively “mineral”). Material risk factors 

and  uncertainties,  which  should  be  taken  into  account  in  assessing  the  Company’s  activities,  include,  but  are  not 

13

tsodilo resources limited

necessarily limited to, those set below. Any one or more of these risks and others could have a material adverse effect 

on the Company.

Additional Funding Requirements

Further development and exploration of the various mineral projects in which the Company holds an interest depends 

upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through equity or debt financing, joint ventures or other means. While 

the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there can be no 

assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing in the amount and at the time required 

and, if available, that it can be obtained on terms satisfactory to the Company.

Failure  to  obtain  equity  or  debt  financing  on  a  timely  basis  may  cause  the  Company  to  postpone  its  exploration  and 

development plans or forfeit rights in some of its projects.

Uncertainties Related to Mineral Resource Estimates

There  is  a  degree  of  uncertainty  attributable  to  the  calculation  of  mineral  resources  and  corresponding  grades  being 

mined  or  dedicated  to  future  production.  Until  resources  are  actually  mined  and  processed,  the  quantity  of  resources 

and grades must be considered as estimates only. In addition, the quantity and value of reserves or resources may vary, 

depending  on  mineral  prices.  Any  material  change  in  the  quantity  of  resources,  grades  or  stripping  ratio  may  affect 

the  economic  viability  of  the  Company’s  properties.  In  addition,  there  is  no  assurance  that  recoveries  in  small-scale 

laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger-scale tests under on-site conditions, or during production. Determining the 

economic viability of a mineral project is complicated and involves a number of variables. 

Commodity Prices and Marketability

The mining industry, in general, is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if commercial quantities 

of minerals are discovered, a profitable market will exist for the sale of minerals produced. Factors beyond the control 

of the Company may affect the marketability of any minerals produced and which cannot be accurately predicted, such 

as  market  fluctuations,  and  such  other  factors  as  government  regulations,  including  regulations  relating  to  royalties, 

allowable  production,  importing  and  exporting  of  minerals  and  environmental  protection,  any  combination  of  which 

factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on investment capital. Prices received for minerals 

produced and sold are also affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control such as international economic 

and  political  trends,  global  or  regional  consumption  and  demand  and  supply  patterns. There  is  no  assurance  that  the 

sale price of minerals produced from any deposit will be such that they can be mined at a profit.

Currency Risk

The Company’s business is mainly transacted in Botswana Pula and U.S. dollar currencies. As a consequence, fluctuations 

in  exchange  rates  may  have  a  significant  effect  on  the  cash  flows  and  operating  results  of  the  Company  in  either  a 

positive or negative direction.

Foreign Operations Risk

The  Company’s  current  significant  projects  are  located  in  Botswana. This  exposes  the  Company  to  risks  that  may  not 

otherwise  be  experienced  if  its  operations  were  domestic.  The  risks  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  environmental 

protection,  land  use,  water  use,  health  safety,  labor,  restrictions  on  production,  price  controls,  currency  remittance, 

and  maintenance  of  mineral  tenure  and  expropriation  of  property. There  is  no  assurance  that  future  changes  in  taxes 

or such regulation in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates will not adversely affect the Company’s 

operations.  Although  the  operating  environments  in  Botswana  are  considered  favorable  compared  to  those  in  other 

developing countries, there are still political risks. These risks include, but are not limited to terrorism, hostage taking, 

military  repression,  expropriation,  extreme  fluctuations  in  currency  exchange  rates,  high  rates  of  inflation  and  labor 

unrest.  Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitudes may also adversely affect the Company’s 

business.

14

tsodilo resources limited

Mineral Exploration and Development

The  business  of  exploring  for  minerals  and  mining  is  highly,  speculative  in  nature  and  involves  significant  financial 

and other risks which even careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. There is no certainty that 

expenditures made or to be made by the Company in exploring and developing mineral properties in which it has an 

interest  will  result  in  the  discovery  of  commercially  mineable  deposits.  Most  exploration  projects  do  not  result  in  the 

discovery  of  commercially  mineable  deposit.  While  discovery  of  a  mineral  deposit  may  result  in  substantial  rewards, 

few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to 

establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities at a site. There can be no guarantee that 

exploration programs carried out by the Company will result in the development of profitable mining operations.

Title Matters

Any changes in the laws of Botswana relating to mining could have a material adverse effect to the rights and title to 

the interests held in those countries by the Company. No assurance can be given that applicable governments will not 

revoke or significantly alter the conditions of applicable exploration and mining authorizations nor that such exploration 

and mining authorizations will not be challenged or impugned by third parties.

Infrastructure

Exploration,  development,  mining  and  processing  activities  depend  on  the  availability  of  adequate  infrastructure. 

Reliable  roads,  bridges,  sewer  and  water  supply  are  important  determinants  which  affect  capital  and  operating  costs. 

Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance of provision 

of such infrastructure could adversely affect activities and profitability of the Company.

Uninsured Risks

The mining business is subject to a number of risks and hazards including, but not limited to, environmental hazards, 

industrial  accidents,  labor  disputes,  encountering  unusual  or  unexpected  geologic  formations  or  other  geological  or 

grade  problems,  encountering  unanticipated  ground  or  water  conditions,  cave~  ins,  pit  wall  failures,  flooding,  rock 

bursts,  periodic  interruptions  due  to  inclement  or  hazardous  weather  conditions  and  other  acts  of  God.  Such  risks 

could  result  in  damage  to  mineral  properties  or  facilities,  personal  injury  or  death,  environmental  damage,  delays  in 

exploration,  development  or  mining,  monetary  losses  and  possible  legal  liability.  The  Company  maintains  insurance 

against certain risks that are associated with its business in amounts that it believes to be reasonable at the current stage 

of operations. There can be no assurance that such insurance will continue to be available at economically acceptable 

premiums or will be adequate to cover any future claim.

Competition

The  mining  industry  is  intensely  competitive  in  all  its  phases  and  the  Company  competes  with  other  companies  that 

have  greater  financial  resources  and  technical  capacity.  Competition  could  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  ability  to 

acquire prospective properties in the future.

Key Personnel

The  Company  is  dependent  upon  on  a  relatively  small  number  of  key  employees,  the  loss  of  any  of  whom  could  have 

an adverse effect on the Company. The Company currently does not have key personal insurance on these individuals.

ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New Accounting Pronouncements

Transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

On January 1, 2011, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board replaced Canadian GAAP with IFRS for publicly accountable 

enterprises,  with  a  transition  date  of  January  1,  2010.  IFRS  represents  standards  and  interpretations  approved  by  the 

IASB and are comprised of IFRSs, IASs, and interpretations issued by IFRICs or the former SICs.

15

tsodilo resources limited

As previously discussed in the Company’s MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company’s two operating 

subsidiaries  previously  prepared  audited  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  IFRS.  Accordingly,  the  Company’s 

transition  plan  was  primarily  focused  on  transition  issues  relating  to  the  consolidation  of  the  Company’s  operating 

subsidiaries, and on accounting issues at the parent company level. The plan consisted of three main phases, as follows:

• 

Scoping and Diagnostic Phase: An initial general diagnostic of its accounting policies and Canadian GAAP relevant 

to  its  financial  reporting  requirements  to  determine  the  key  differences  and  options  with  respect  to  acceptable 

accounting standard under IFRS was completed in 2010.

• 

Impact,  Analysis,  Evaluation  and  Design  Phase:  In  this  phase,  each  area  identified  during  the  scoping  phase  was 

addressed to determine the specific changes required to existing policies and to identify new policies under IFRS. 

This phase has now been completed.

• 

Implementation  and  Review  Phase: This  phase  includes  the  execution  of  any  changes  to  business  processes  and 

completion  of  formal  documents  analyzing  the  transition  to  IFRS. This  phase,  which  includes  the  maintenance  of 

sustainable IFRS compliant data and processes for fiscal 2011 and beyond, was carried out throughout 2011. 

The Company’s IFRS accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Reconciliation 

between the Company’s financial statements as previously reported under Canadian GAAP and the accounting policies 

used  to  prepare  the  interim  condensed  consolidated  financial  statements  as  at  and  for  the  periods  ended  March  31, 

2010, June 30, 2011 and 2010, and September 30, 2011 and 2010, are consistent with the accounting policies used to 

prepare the December 31, 2011 and 2010 consolidated financial statements.  Refer to current reporting under IFRS as 

detailed in Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements.

The following is an overview of the impacts to the Company’s financial results due to the transition to IFRS.

IFRS Adjustments

Adjustment 1 - IFRS 2 Stock Based Compensation Expenses

The Company issues share-based compensation in the form of stock options that vest evenly (semi-annually) over a two 

year period.  Under Canadian GAAP, the Company recognized the fair value of the compensation expenses, determined 

at the time of the grant, on a straight-line basis over the two year vesting period.  Under IFRS 2 Share Based Payments, 

the  fair  value  of  each  tranche  of  the  award  is  considered  to  be  a  separate  grant,  based  on  its  vested  period.   The  fair 

value of each tranche is determined separately and recognized as compensation expense over the term of this respective 

vesting  period.    Accordingly,  compensation  expense  under  IFRS  was  recognized  at  more  accelerated  rates  than  under 

Canadian GAAP.   

The  Company  computed  all  non-vested  stock  options  at  January  1,  2010  on  a  graded  basis  separating  tranches  for 

amortization  over  respective  vesting  periods.    Stock  option  forfeitures  were  also  estimated  on  a  historical  basis.   The 

Black  Scholes  valuation  method  was  used  to  prepare  the  valuations,  calculations  and  details  for  disclosure  for  Stock 

Option expense and comparative stock option expense estimated for prior year comparisons.  As a result, Stock Option 

Reserves  were  increased  by  $29,629  as  at  January  1,  2010  and  $261,482  as  at  December  31,  2010.    Of  these  amounts, 

$4,986 and $133,144 were capitalized as salaries to exploration and evaluation cost as at January 1, 2010 and December 

31, 2010 respectively.     

Adjustment 2 – IAS 21 Foreign Exchange

The Company’s subsidiaries (Gcwihaba and Newdico) operate in a functional currency in Botswana Pula.  Under Canadian 

GAAP  the  subsidiaries  were  considered  integrated  operations  for  foreign  exchange  considerations  and  calculations.  

Under IFRS, since there is no integrated operation option and because of the difference in functional currency between 

these  subsidies  and  the  Company’s  U.S.  Dollars,  IFRS  provides  guidance  on  presenting  the  foreign  operations  in  the 

presentation currency.  Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and income and 

16

tsodilo resources limited

expenses are translated at the rates at which they have been incurred.  This differs from previous GAAP reporting which 

required non-monetary assets to be translated at the historical exchange rate in effect when the assets were acquired.  

For December 31, 2010, a cummulative adjustment of ($82,254) was made to Plant, Property and Equipment, ($159,633) 

was made to Exploration and Evaluation Cost, and 1,994 was made to Accounts Payable.    

Adjustment 3 – IAS 32 Warrants Denominated in Non-functional Currency

The  Warrants  issued  by  the  Company  provide  the  right  to  purchase  stock  in  Canadian  dollars.    Since  the  Company’s 

functional  currency  is  the  U.S.  dollar,  IFRS  requires  that  the  warrants  be  accounted  for  as  derivative  liabilities.        As  a 

result,  the  Company  has  reclassified  its  Warrants  from  Equity  to  liabilities  and  will  account  for  warrants  as  derivative 

liabilities with changes in fair value being recognized in profit or loss.     

At  inception  January  1,  2010  the  value  of  the  warrants  increased  by  $1,466,252  resulting  in  corresponding  charge  to 

deficit.  

Adjustment 4 – Non-Controlling Interest Reclassification into Equity

The Company reclassified its non-controlling interest at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 to equity. 

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOT YET ADOPTED

Certain new standards, interpretations and amendments to existing standards have been issued by the IASB or IFRIC 

that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2010, or later periods.  Some updates that are 

not applicable or are not consequential to the Company may have been excluded from the list below.

IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements

IAS 1 prescribes the basis for presentation of general purpose financial statements and is effective for annual periods 

beginning on or after January 1, 2011 to ensure comparability both with the entity’s financial statements of previous 

periods  and  with  the  financial  statements  of  other  entities.  It  sets  out  overall  requirements  for  the  presentation 

of  financial  statements,  guidelines  for  their  structure  and  minimum  requirements  for  their  content.   There  are  no 

additional significant impacts on the Company.

IAS 24  – Related Party Disclosures (Amendment)

The amended standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. It clarified the definition 

of a related party to simplify the identification of such relationships and to eliminate inconsistencies in its application. 

The revised standard introduces a partial exemption of disclosure requirements for government-related entities. The 

Company does not expect any impact on its financial position or performance. Early adoption is permitted for either 

the partial exemption for government-related entities or for the entire standard.  There are no additional significant 

impacts on the Company.

Accounting standards effective January 1, 2012

Financial instruments disclosure

In  October  2010,  the  IASB  issued  amendments  to  IFRS  7  –  Financial  Instruments:  Disclosures  that  improve  the 

disclosure  requirements  in  relation  to  transferred  financial  assets.   The  amendments  are  effective  for  the  annual 

periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The Company does not anticipate the 

amendment to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.  

Income Taxes

In  December  2010,  the  IASB  issued  an  amendment  to  IAS  12  –  Income  taxes  that  provide  a  practical  solution  to 

determining the recovery of investment properties as it relates to the accounting for deferred income taxes.  This 

amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The 

Company does not anticipate this amendment to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.  

17

tsodilo resources limited

Accounting standards anticipated to be effective January 1, 2013

IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments Disclosure

IFRS  9  Financial  Instruments  was  published  and  contained  requirements  for  financial  assets  updating  IFRS  7. 

Requirements for financial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010. Most of the requirements for financial 

liabilities were carried forward unchanged from IAS 39. However, some changes were made to the fair value option 

for financial liabilities to address the issue of own credit risk.  The Company does not anticipate this amendment to 

have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.  

IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS  10  requires  that  a  reporting  entity  should  consolidate  any  investee  that  it  controls.  Control  is  the  basis  for 

consolidation for all types of investees. IFRS 10 also provides guidance on assessing control in circumstances where 

the assessment has proven to be difficult. IFRS 10 provides more guidance about the factors to consider in such 

structures  that  involve  potential  voting  rights,  agency  relationships,  relationships  with  structured  entities  and 

control without a majority of voting rights.  The Company consolidation with its current subsidiaries and related 

consolidation decisions should be unaffected by the new consolidation model in IFRS 10.  

IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements

The  IASB  issued  IFRS  11  –  Joint  Arrangements  on  May  12,  2011.    IFRS  11  eliminates  the  Company’s  choice  to 

proportionately  consolidate  jointly  controlled  entities  and  requires  such  entities  to  be  accounted  for  using  the 

equity methods and proposes to establish a principles-based approach to the accounting for joint arrangements 

which  focuses  on  the  nature,  extent  and  financial  effects  of  the  activities  that  an  entity  caries  out  through 

joint  arrangements  and  its  contractual  rights  and  obligations  to  assets  and  liabilities,  respectively,  of  the  joint 

arrangements.  The Company does not anticipate this amendment will have a significant impact on its consolidated 

financial statements.  

IFRS 12 – Disclosure of Interest in other entities

IFRS 12 sets out disclosure requirements for reporting entities that have an interest in a subsidiary, joint arrangement, 

associate or unconsolidated structured entity.  The are no additional interest or disclosures required.  

Consolidation

On September 20, 2010 the IASB posted a staff draft of a forthcoming IFRS on consolidation.  The staff draft reflects 

tentative  decisions  made  to  date  by  the  IASB  with  respect  to  the  IASB’s  project  to  replace  current  standard  on 

consolidations,  IAS  27  –  Consolidated  and  Separate  Financial  Statements  and  SIC-12,  with  a  single  standard  on 

consolidation.    The  IASB  plans  on  publishing  the  final  standard  on  consolidation  during  the  first  half  of  2011, 

with  an  anticipated  effective  date  of  January  1,  2013.   The  Company  is  currently  evaluating  the  impact  the  final 

standard’s expected to have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.  

Fair Value Measurement 

IFRS  13,  Fair  Value  Measurement:  effective  for  annual  periods  beginning  on  or  after  January  1,  2013,  with  early 

adoption permitted, sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value and new required disclosures 

about  fair  value  measurements.    Management  anticipates  that  this  standard  will  be  adopted  in  the  Company’s 

financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013, and has not yet considered the potential impact of 

the adoption of IFRS 13.  

Accounting standards effective January 1, 2012
Financial instruments disclosure 

In  October  2010,  the  IASB  issued  amendments  to  IFRS  7  –  Financial  Instruments:  Disclosures  that  improve  the 

disclosure  requirements  in  relation  to  transferred  financial  assets.    The  amendments  are  effective  for  the  annual 

18

tsodilo resources limited

periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The Company does not anticipate the 

amendment to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. 

Income Taxes 

In  December  2010,  the  IASB  issued  an  amendment  to  IAS  12  –  Income  taxes  that  provide  a  practical  solution  to 

determining the recovery of investment properties as it relates to the accounting for deferred income taxes.  This 

amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The 

Company does not anticipate this amendment to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.  

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS  
During the years ended December 31, 2011,  2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred leave benefits (2011 $23,412 

2010: $33,293 2009: $19,024, 2008: $19,024) payable to an officer and director of the Company amounting to $94,753.  

In  June  2010:  $59,451  April  2011:  $19,612  December  2011:  $15,690,  the  Company  paid  the  officer  and  director  of  the 

Company  a  total  of  $94,753,  leaving  a  zero  balance  payable  as  at  December  31,  2011  to  an  officer  and  director  of  the 

Company.    

Remuneration of Key Management Personnel of the Company

Short Term employee remuneration and benefi ts
Stock based compensation
Total compensation paid to key management personnel

There are no other related party transactions. 

2011
$   419,861
522,963
$   942,824

2010
$   348,427
559,963
$ 908,390

OUTLOOK
Diamond  and  metal  exploration  remains  a  high-risk  undertaking  requiring  patience  and  persistence.  Despite  difficult 

capital markets in the junior resource sector, the Company remains committed to international commodity exploration 

through carefully managed programs.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information relating to Tsodilo Resources Limited is available on its website www.TsodiloResources.com or 

through SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Annual Report, including this MD&A, contains certain forward-looking statements related to, among other things, 

expected future events and the financial and operating results of the Company. Forward-looking statements are subject 

to inherent risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, market and general economic conditions, changes in 

regulatory environments affecting the Company’s business and the availability and terms of financing. Other risks are 

outlined in the Uncertainties and Risk Factors section of this MD&A. Consequently, actual results and events may differ 

materially from those included in, contemplated or implied by such forward looking statements for a variety of reasons. 

Readers are therefore cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. The Company disclaims 

any  intention  and  assumes  no  obligation  to  update  any  forward-looking  statement  even  if  such  information  becomes 

available as a result of future events or for any other reason.

James M. Bruchs   

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

February 17, 2012 

Gary A. Bojes

Chief Financial Officer

February 17, 2012

19

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Reporting Responsibility of Management

The  annual  report  and  consolidated  financial  statements 

control.  The  Audit  Committee  is  composed  of  three 

have  been  prepared  by  management.  The  consolidated 

directors,  all  of  whom  qualify  as  unrelated  directors 

financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in  accordance 

and  are  independent  of  management  and  free  from  any 

with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  and 

interest or business relationship which could, or could be 

include  amounts  that  are  based  on  informed  judgments 

perceived to materially interfere with their ability to act in 

and  best  estimates.  The  financial  information  presented 

the best interests of the Company. This committee meets 

in  this  annual  report  is  consistent  with  the  consolidated 

periodically  with  management  and  the  external  auditors 

financial 

statements.  Management 

acknowledges 

to  review  accounting,  auditing, 

internal  control  and 

responsibility for the fairness, integrity and objectivity of 

financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee reviews 

all  information  contained  in  the  annual  report  including 

the annual financial statements before they are presented 

the  consolidated  financial  statements.  Management  is 

to  the  Board  of  Directors  for  approval  and  considers  the 

also  responsible  for  the  maintenance  of  financial  and 

independence of the auditors.

operating  systems,  which  include  effective  controls  to 

provide  reasonable  assurance  that  assets  are  properly 

protected  and 

that 

relevant  and 

reliable 

financial 

information  is  produced.  Our  independent  auditors  have 

the  responsibility  of  auditing  the  consolidated  financial 

statements and expressing an opinion on them. 

The consolidated financial statements for the years ended 

December  31,  2011  and  2010  and  the  January  1,  2010 

opening  IFRS  statement  of  financial  position  have  been 

audited  by  Ernst  &  Young  LLP,  the  external  auditors,  in 

accordance  with  Canadian  generally  accepted  auditing 

The  Board  of  Directors,  through  its  Audit  Committee, 

standards  on  behalf  of  the  shareholders.  Their  report 

is  responsible  for  ensuring  that  management  fulfills 

follows hereafter.

its  responsibilities  for  financial  reporting  and  internal 

James M. Bruchs 
Chairman and Chief Executive Offi  cer   
February 17, 2012   

Gary A. Bojes
Chief Financial Offi  cer
February 17, 2012

20

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AUDITORS’ REPORT 

To the Shareholders of Tsodilo Resources Limited:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial 

An  audit 

involves  performing  procedures  to  obtain 

statements of Tsodilo Resources Limited, which comprise 

audit  evidence  about  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in 

the  statements  of  financial  position  as  at  December  31, 

the  consolidated  financial  statements.  The  procedures 

2011 and 2010, and January 1, 2010 and the consolidated 

selected  depend  on  the  auditors’  judgment,  including 

statements  of  operations  and  comprehensive  income 

the  assessment  of  the  risks  of  material  misstatement 

(loss),  shareholders’  equity  and  cash  flows  for  the  years 

of  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  whether  due 

ended  December  31,  2011  and  2010,  and  a  summary  of 

to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk  assessments,  the 

significant  accounting  policies  and  other  explanatory 

auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s 

information.

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated 
financial statements

preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  the  consolidated 

financial  statements  in  order  to  design  audit  procedures 

that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the 

purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness 

Management  is  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  fair 

of  the  entity’s  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes 

presentation  of  these  consolidated  financial  statements 

evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies 

in  accordance  with 

International  Financial  Reporting 

used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates 

Standards,  and  for  such  internal  control  as  management 

made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall 

determines  is  necessary  to  enable  the  preparation  of 

presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

consolidated  financial  statements  that  are  free  from 

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ responsibility

We  believe  that  the  audit  evidence  we  have  obtained  in 

our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis 

for our audit opinion. 

Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these 

consolidated  financial  statements  based  on  our  audits. 

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  Canadian 

Opinion

generally  accepted  auditing  standards.  Those  standards 

In  our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial  statements 

require  that  we  comply  with  ethical  requirements  and 

present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position 

plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance 

of Tsodilo Resources Limited as at December 31, 2011 and 

about  whether  the  consolidated  financial  statements  are 

2010,  and  January  1,  2010  and  its  financial  performance 

free from material misstatement.

and  its  cash  flows  for  the  years  ended  December  31, 

2011 and 2010 in accordance with International Financial 

Reporting Standards.

Vancouver, Canada
February 17, 2012

Chartered Accountants

21

tsodilo resources limited

    
Tsodilo Resources Limited

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(In United States dollars)

ASSETS

Current

Cash 

December 31
2011

December 31
2010
(Note 14)

January 1 
2010
(Note 14)

$    1,505,965

$     2,728,695

$     108,341

Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses

Exploration and Evaluation Assets (note 3)

Property, Plant and Equipment  (note 4)

Deposit on Equipment (note 4) 

179,352

1,685,317

8,774,657

1,017,938

--

65,171

2,793,866

7,493,891

323,416

870,805

67,640

175,981

4,919,093

222,683

--

$ 11,477,912

$ 11,481,978

$ 5,317,757

LIABILITIES

Current

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

$         104,105

$           97,448

$          73,051

Warrants (note 5b)

Total Liabilities

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share Capital (note 5a)

Stock Option Reserves (note 5c)

Foreign Currency Reserves

Defi cit

 Equity attributable to Owners of the Parent 

Non-controlling Interest (note 3)

Total Equity

1,500,766

1,604,871

35,056,638

8,711,103

(1,455,134)

5,266,191

5,363,639

32,038,044

7,884,206

318,924

2,598,156

2,671,207

29,646,445

6,915,917

-

(32,653,953)

(34,373,199)

(34,150,053)

9,658,654

214,387

9,873,041

5,867,975

250,364

6,118,339

2,412,309

234,241

2,646,550

 Total Liabilities and Equity

$ 11,477,912

$ 11,481,978

$ 5,317,757

Commitments (note 11)
Subsequent events (note 13)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements  

APPROVED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

David J. Cushing 
Chairman, of the Audit Committee 

James M. Bruchs 
Chairman

22

tsodilo resources limited

 
            
 
 
Tsodilo Resources Limited

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In United States dollars)

Administrative  Expenses

Corporate remuneration  

Corporate travel and subsistence 

Investor relations 

Legal and audit

Filings and regulatory fees

Administrative expenses 

Amortization

Stock-based compensation (note 5c)

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense

Warrant issue cost

Unrealized gain (loss) on warrants (Note 5b)

Foreign exchange (loss)

Net Income (Loss) for period

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Foreign currency translation

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the period

                                          Year Ended December 31

2011

2010
(Note 14)

$          148,624

$       79,692

27,264

16,911

134,876

30,303

164,046

4,846

427,864

954,734

3,077

--

2,673,378

(2,475)

4,092

9,500

63,878

22,635

148,255

2,035

478,772

808,859

6,489

(52,804)

671,515

(39,487)

$          1,719,246

($   223,146)

(1,810,035)

335,047

(1,810,035)

($   90,789)

335,407

$     111,901

Net Income (Loss) attributable to shareholders of the parent

$       1,719,246

($   223,146)

Non-controlling interest

Total  Comprehensive  Income  (Loss)  attributable  to  owners  of 
the parent

Non-controlling Interest

Basic  income  (loss)  per  share  attributable  to  owners  of  the 
parent (note 7)
Fully diluted income (loss) per share attributable to the owners 
of the parent (note 7)
Basic comprehensive income (loss) per share attributable to the 
owners of the parent (note 7)
Fully diluted comprehensive income (loss) per share attributable 
to the owners of the parent (note 7)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 

--

--

$       1,719,246

($   223,146)

(54,812)

(35,977)

($90,789)

$0.07

$0.07

($0.00)

($0.00)

$  95,778

16,123

$    111,901

($0.01)

($0.01)

$0.01

$0.01

23

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
Tsodilo Resources Limited

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 

(In United States dollars except for shares)

Share Capital

Shares 
Issued

       Amount

Stock 
Option 
Reserve

Foreign 
Currency 
Reserve

Defi cit

Total 
attributable to 
equity holder 
of the parent

Non-
Controlling 
Interest

Total
Equity

22,647,340 $32,038,044$7,884,206

$318,924 ($34,373,199))

$5,867,975

$250,364 $6,118,339

3,233,630

3,018,594

--

--

--

--

--

826,897

--

--

--

--

3,018,594

826,897

-- 3,018,594

--

826,897

--

(1,774,058)

1,719,246

(54,812)

 (35,977)

(90,789)

25,880,970 $35,056,638$8,711,103 ($1,455,134) ($32,653,953)

$9,658,654

$214,387 $9,873,041

Balance January 1, 
2011
Exercise of warrants
Stock Based 
Compensation 
Comprehensive 
Income (loss)  2011

Balance December 
31, 2011

See accompanying notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements.

Tsodilo Resources Limited

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity 
(In United States dollars except for shares)

Share Capital

Stock 
Option 
Reserve

Foreign 
Currency 
Reserve

Defi cit

Shares

Dollars

Non-
Controlling 
Interest

Total

Total 
attributable 
to equity 
holder of 
the parent

Balance January 1, 
2010 

18,787,457 $29,646,445 $6,915,917

- ($34,150,053) $2,412,309 $234,241 $2,646,550

Private Placement

3,859,883

1,200,362

(21,554)

1,212,791

--

--

--

--

--

--

968,289

--

--

--

--

1,200,362

--

1,200,362

(21,554)

1,212,791

968,289

--

--

(21,554)

1,212,791

968,289

--

--

--

318,924

(223,146)

95,778

16,123

111,901

Transaction Costs

Exercised Warrants
Stock Based 
Compensation 
Comprehensive 
Income (loss)

 Balance December 
31, 2010 

22,647,340 $32,038,044 $7,884,206 $318,924 ($34,373,199) $5,867,975 $250,364 $6,118,339

See accompanying notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements.

24

tsodilo resources limited

Tsodilo Resources Limited

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In United States dollars)

Cash provided by (used in): 

Operating Activities

Net Income (Loss) for the year

Adjustments for non-cash items:

     Unrealized (gain) loss on warrants

     Amortization
     Stock-based compensation 

Net change in non-cash working capital balances (note 12) 

Investing Activities

Additions to exploration properties

Deposit on equipment

Additions to property, plant and equipment  

Financing Activities

Shares and warrants issued for cash, net of cost

Change in cash - For the year

Cash - beginning of year

Cash - end of year

See accompanying notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements

Year  Ended December  31

2011

2010

$ 1,719,246

($   223,146)

(2,673,378)

4,846
427,864
(521,422)

(107,524)

(628,946)

(2,270,342)

--

(249,989)

(2,520,331)

1,926,547

1,926,547

(1,222,730)

2,728,695

$  1,505,965

(671,515)

2,035
478,772
(413,854)

26,866

(386,988)

(1,584,780)

(870,805)

(215,417)

(2,671,002)

5,678,344

5,678,344

2,620,354

108,341

$ 2,728,695

25

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tsodilo Resources Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Tsodilo Resources Limited (“Tsodilo” or “the Company”) is an exploration stage company which is engaged principally in 

the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in the Republic of Botswana.

The  Company  is  considered  to  be  in  the  exploration  and  development  stage  given  that  none  of  its  properties  are  in 

production and, to date, has not earned any significant revenues.  The recoverability of amounts shown for exploration 

and evaluation assets is dependent on the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the renewal of exploration 

licenses,  obtaining  the  necessary  permits  to  operate  a  mine,  obtaining  the  financing  to  complete  exploration  and 

development, and future profitable production.   It is incorporated under laws of the Yukon Territory, Canada, under the 

Business Corporations Act of Yukon and the address of the Company’s registered office is 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 508 

Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2S1. The Company currently exists under the Business Corporations Act of Yukon and its 

common shares are listed on the Toronto Venture Stock Exchange (TSXV) under the symbol TSD.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going 

concern,  which  assumes  that  the  Company  will  realize  its  assets  and  discharge  its  liabilities  in  the  normal  course  of 

business.    Management  has  carried  out  an  assessment  of  the  going  concern  assumption  and  has  concluded  that  the 

Company  has  sufficient  cash  (as  well  as  no  debt  obligations  outside  of  normal  course  accounts  payable  and  accrued 

liabilities) to continue operating for the ensuing twelve months.  Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements 

do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, or the impact on the consolidated statement 

of  operations  and  comprehensive  income  (loss),  and  consolidated  statement  of  financial  position  classifications  that 

would be necessary were the going concern assumption not appropriate.  

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) 

Statement of Compliance and conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards

These  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  are  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards 

(“IFRS”)  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards  Board  (“IASB”)  and  interpretations  of  the  International 

Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

These are the Company’s fi rst consolidated fi nancial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS using accounting policies 

consistent with IFRS.  The accounting policies have been selected to be consistent with IFRS eff ective on December 31, 

2011, the Company’s fi rst annual IFRS reporting date.  Previously, the Company prepared its annual consolidated fi nancial 

statements in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).  

These  consolidated  fi nancial  statements  have  been  authorized  for  release  by  the  Company’s  Board  of  Directors  on 

February 17, 2012.

26

tsodilo resources limited

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

(b) 

Basis of Preparation

These consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for fi nancial instruments classifi ed as fair 

value through profi t and loss which are stated at their fair value.  These consolidated fi nancial statements are presented in United Stated 

dollars and include the accounts of the Company and the following direct and indirect subsidiaries:

Tsodilo Resources Bermuda Limited (Bermuda)

2011

100%

Gcwihaba Resources (Proprietary) Limited  (“Gcwihaba”) [Botswana]

100%

Bosoto (Proprietary) Limited (“Bosoto”)  [Botswana]

Newdico (Proprietary) Limited (“Newdico”) [Botswana]

100%

97%

All intercompany transactions have been eliminated  on  consolidation

2010

100%

100%

100%

96%

The  adoption  of  IFRS  resulted  in  changes  to  the  accounting  policies  as  compared  with  the  most  recent  annual  fi nancial  statements 

prepared under Canadian GAAP.  The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented.  They 

also have been applied in preparation of an opening IFRS statement of fi nancial position as at January 1, 2010 (the “Transition Date”), as 

required by IFRS 1. First Time Adoptions of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”).  The impact of the transition from Canadian 

GAAP to IFRS is explained in note 14.  

(c) 

Significant Accounting Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates 

and assumptions that aff ect the application of polices and reporting amounts and assets and liabilities, income and expenses.  Actual 

results may diff er from these estimates.  

Accounts that require estimates as the basis for determining the stated amounts include exploration and evaluation assets, property, plant 

and equipment, warrant liability and share-based compensation.  Depreciation and depletion of exploration and evaluation assets and 

property, plant and equipment assets are dependent upon estimates of useful lives and resource estimates, both of which are determined 

with the exercise of judgment.  The assessment of any impairment of exploration and evaluation assets or property, plant and equipment 

upon the estimates of fair value that take into account factors such as resources, economic and market conditions, and the useful lives of 

assets.  Share-based compensation expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model which requires signifi cant judgment 

as to considerations such as stock option lives and stock volatility.    Warrant liability is also calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation 

model which requires signifi cant judgment as to the considerations such as warrant lives and stock volatility.  

(d) 

Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

Earnings  (loss)  per  share  calculations  are  based  on  the  net  income  attributable  to  common  shareholders  for  the  year  divided  by  the 

weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the year.  

Diluted earnings per share calculations are based on the net income attributable to common shareholders for the year divided by the 

weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus the eff ects of dilutive common share equivalents.  This 

method requires that the dilutive eff ect of outstanding options and warrants issued be calculated using the treasury stock method.  This 

method assumes that all common share equivalents have been exercised at the beginning of the year (or at the time of issuance, if later), 

and that the funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common shares of the Company at the average trading price of common 

27

tsodilo resources limited

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

shares during the year.  The incremental number of common shares that would be issued is included in the calculation of 

diluted earnings per share.  

Diluted earnings per share calculations are based on the net comprehensive income (loss) and income attributable to 

common shareholders for the year divided by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding 

during the year ended 2011.  Stock options and share purchase warrants are included in the computation of comprehensive 

income (loss) and income per share for the year ended December 31, 2011.  

(e) 

Exploration and Evaluation Assets

Exploration  and  evaluation  assets  include  acquired  mineral  use  rights  for  mineral  properties  held  by  the  Company.  

The amount of consideration paid (in cash or share value) for mineral use rights is capitalized.  The amounts shown for 

exploration  and  evaluation  assets  represents  all  direct  and  indirect  costs  relating  to  the  acquisition,  exploration  and 

development  of  exploration  properties,  less  recoveries,  and  do  not  necessarily  refl ect  present  or  future  values.   These 

costs will be amortized against revenue from future production or written off  if the exploration and evaluation assets are 

abandoned or sold.  The Company has classifi ed exploration and evaluation assets as intangible in nature.  Depletion of 

costs capitalized on projects put into commercial production will be recorded using the unit-of-production method based 

upon estimates of proven and probable reserves.

Ownership  of  exploration  and  evaluation  assets  involves  certain  inherent  risks,  including  geological,  metal  prices, 

operating costs, and permitting risks.  Many of these risks are outside the Company’s control.  The ultimate recoverability 

of  the  amounts  capitalized  for  exploration  and  evaluation  assets  is  dependent  upon  the  delineation  of  economically 

recoverable  ore  reserves,  the  renewal  of  exploration  licenses,  obtaining  the  necessary  fi nancing  to  complete  their 

development,  obtaining  the  necessary  permits  to  operate  the  mine,  and  realizing  profi table  production  or  proceeds 

from  the  disposition  thereof.    Management’s  estimates  of  recoverability  of  the  Company’s  investment  in  its  Botswana 

exploration  and  evaluation  assets  have  been  based  on  current  and  expected  conditions.    However,  it  is  possible  that 

changes  could  occur  which  could  adversely  aff ect  management’s  estimates  and  may  result  in  future  write  downs  of 

exploration and evaluation assets carrying values.  

(f) 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.  

Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis over the following terms:

Vehicles   

5 Years

Furniture and equipment 

3 Years

An  item  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  is  derecognized  upon  disposal  or  when  no  future  economic  benefi ts  are 

expected to arise from the continued use of the asset.  Any gain or loss arising on disposal of the asset, determined as the 

diff erence between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, is recognized in profi t or loss.

Where  an  item  of  plant  and  equipment  comprises  major  components  with  diff erent  useful  lives,  the  components  are 

accounted for as separate items of plant and equipment.  Expenditures incurred to replace a component of an item of plant 

and equipment that is accounted for separately, including major inspection and overhaul expenditures, are capitalized.

(g) 

Cash

Cash consists of cash held in banks.

28

tsodilo resources limited

 
2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

 (h) 

Foreign Currency Translation

(i) Functional and presentation currency

The Company’s functional and presentation currency is the United States dollar.  The functional currency of the Company’s 

subsidiaries is as follows:

Tsodilo Resources Bermuda Limited 

Gcwihaba 

Newdico  

Bosoto 

U.S. Dollar

Botswana Pula

Botswana Pula

Botswana Pula

Each  subsidiary  and  the  Company’s  parent  entity  determine  their  own  functional  currency  and  items  included  in  the 

fi nancial statements of each subsidiary are measured using that functional currency.

(ii) Transactions and balances

Transactions  in  foreign  currencies  are  initially  recorded  in  the  functional  currency  by  applying  the  exchange  rates 

prevailing at the date of the transaction.  Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated 

at the exchange rate prevailing at the reporting  date.

(iii) Translation of foreign operations

As at the reporting date the assets and liabilities of Gcwihaba, Newdico and Bosoto are translated into the presentation 

currency  of  the  Company  at  the  rate  of  exchange  prevailing  at  the  reporting  date  and  its  revenue  and  expenses  are 

translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transactions.  The exchange diff erences arising on the translation are 

taken  to  the  foreign  currency  reserve.    On  consolidation,  exchange  diff erences  arising  from  the  translation  of  the  net 

investments in Gcwihaba, Newdico and Bosoto are taken to the foreign currency reserve.  

If Gcwihaba, Newdico and Bosoto were sold, the exchange diff erences would be transferred out of equity and recognized 

in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  

(i) 

Income Taxes

Current taxes are the expected tax payable or receivable on the local taxable income or loss for the year, using the local tax 

rate enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting  date, and includes any adjustments to tax payable or receivable in 

respect of previous years.  

Deferred income taxes are recorded using the balance sheet method whereby deferred tax is recognized in respect to 

temporary  diff erences  between  the  carrying  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  for  fi nancial  reporting  purposes  and  the 

amounts used for taxation purposes.  Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary 

diff erences when they are realized or settled, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the 

reporting  date.  Deferred tax is not recognized for temporary diff erences which arise on the initial recognition of assets or 

liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that aff ect neither accounting, nor taxable profi t or loss.  

A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary diff erences, to the extent 

that it is probable that future taxable profi ts will be available against which they can be utilized.  Deferred tax assets are 

reviewed each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefi t will 

be realized.  

29

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

(j) 

Share-based Compensation

The Company follows the fair value method of accounting for stock option awards granted to employees, directors and 

consultants.  The fair value of stock options is determined by the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with assumptions 

for risk-free interest rates, dividend yields, volatility of the expected market price of the Company’s common shares and 

an expected life of the options.  The number of stock option awards expected to vest are estimated using a forfeiture 

rate based on historical experience and future expectations.  The fair value of direct awards of stock is determined by 

the quoted market price of the Company’s stock.  Share-based compensation is amortized to earnings and portions are 

capitalized for indirect exploration costs over the vesting period of the related option.  

The  Company  uses  graded  or  accelerated  amortization  which  specifi es  that  each  vesting  tranche  must  be  accounted 

for as a separate arrangement with a unique fair value measurement.  Each vesting tranche is subsequently amortized 

separately and in parallel from the grant date.

Option-pricing models require the use of highly subjective estimates and assumptions including the expected stock price 

volatility.  Changes in the underlying assumptions can materially aff ect the fair value estimates.  

(k) 

Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities (Asset Retirement Obligation or “ARO”)

The Company records the present value of estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to restore the 

site in a period in which the obligation is incurred.  The nature of these restorations activities include dismantling and 

removing structures, rehabilitating mines and tailings dams, dismantling facilities, closure of plant and waste sites and 

restoration, reclamation and re-vegetation of aff ected areas.  

The  future  obligations  for  mine  closure  activities  are  estimated  by  the  Company  using  mine  closure  plans  or  other 

similar studies which outline the requirements that will be carried out to meet the obligations.  Since the obligations are 

dependent on the laws and regulations of Botswana where the potential mines would operate, the requirements could 

change as a result of amendments in the laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and other legislation 

aff ecting resource companies.  

As the estimate of the obligations is based on future expectations, a number of assumptions and judgments are made by 

management in the determination of closure provisions.  The closure provisions are more uncertain the further into the 

future the mine closure activities are to be carried out.  

The  present  value  of  decommissioning  and  site  restoration  costs  are  recorded  as  a  long-term  liability.   The  provision 

is  discounted  using  a  nominal,  risk  free  pre-tax  discount  rate.    Charges  for  accretion  and  restoration  expenditures  are 

recorded as operating activities.  In subsequent periods, the carrying amount of the liability is accreted by a charge to the 

statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) to refl ect the passage of time and the liability is accreted by a 

charge to the statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) to refl ect the passage of time and the liability is 

adjusted to refl ect any change in the timing of the underlying future cash fl ows.  

Changes to the obligation resulting from any revisions to the timing or amount of the original estimate of undiscounted 

cash fl ows are recognized as an increase or decrease in the decommissioning provision, and a corresponding change in 

the carrying amount of the related long term asset.  Where rehabilitation is conducted systematically over the life of the 

operation, rather than at the time of closure, a provision is made for the estimated outstanding continuous rehabilitation 

work at each reporting  date and the cost is charged to the statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).  

The Company had no asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010.

30

tsodilo resources limited

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

(l) 

Financial Assets 

All financial assets are initially recorded at fair value and designated upon inception into one of the following  

four 

categories:  held  for  maturity,  available  for  sale,  loans  and  receivables,  or  at  fair  value  through  profi t  or  loss  (“FVTPL”).  

Financial assets classifi ed as FVTPL are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses,   recognized 

through 

earnings.  The Company does not have any fi nancial assets classifi ed as FVTPL.   

Financial  assets  classifi ed  as  loans  and  receivables  and  held  to  maturity  assets  are  measured  at  amortized  cost.   The 

Company’s cash and accounts receivable are classifi ed as loans and receivables.  Financial assets classifi ed as available for 

sale are measured at fair value with unrealized gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income and loss except 

for losses in value that are considered other than temporary which are recognized in earnings.  At December 31, 2011, 

December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the Company has not classifi ed any fi nancial assets as available for sale.  

Transaction costs associated with FVTPL fi nancial assets are expensed as incurred, while transaction costs associated with 

all other fi nancial assets are included in the initial carrying amount of the asset.  

(m) 

Financial Liabilities

All fi nancial liabilities are initially recorded at fair value and designated upon inception as FVTPL or other fi nancial liabilities.  

Financial  liabilities  classifi ed  as  other  fi nancial  liabilities  are  initially  recognized  at  fair  value  less  directly  attributable 

transaction costs.  After initial recognition, other fi nancial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using 

the eff ective interest rate method.  The eff ective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a 

fi nancial liability and of allocating interest expenses over the relevant period.  The eff ective interest rate is the rate that 

discounts  estimated  future  cash  payments  through  the  expected  life  of  the  fi nancial  liability,  to,  where  appropriate,  a 

shorter period.  The Company’s accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classifi ed as other fi nancial liabilities. 

Financial liabilities classifi ed as FVTPL include warrants with exercise prices denominated in a currency other than the 

Company’s functional currency.  Derivatives, including separated embedded derivatives are also classifi ed as FVTPL and 

recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings unless they are designated as eff ective hedging 

instruments.  Fair value changes on fi nancial liabilities classifi ed as FVTPL are recognized in earnings. Transaction costs 

associated with FVTPL liabilities are expensed as incurred.  

(n) 

Impairment of assets 

At the end of each reporting period, the Company assesses each cash generating unit to determine whether there is any 

indication that those assets are impaired.  If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in 

order to determine the extent of the impairment, if any.  The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less cost to 

sell and the value in use.  Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an 

arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties.  In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash 

fl ows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that refl ects current market assessment of the time value 

of money and the risk of a specifi c asset.  If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying 

amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount and the impairment loss is recognized in 

profi t or loss for the period.  For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash infl ows, the recoverable amount 

is determined for the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs.  

When an impairment subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) is increased to the 

revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but to an amount that does not exceed the carrying amount that would have 

been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash generating unit) in prior years.  A reversal 

of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profi t or loss.  

31

tsodilo resources limited

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

(o) 

Related Party transactions

Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise 

signifi cant infl uence over the other party in making fi nancial and operating decisions.  Related parties may be individuals 

or corporate entities.  A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources, 

services or obligations between related parties. 

(p) 

New standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective 

Certain  new  standards,  interpretations  and  amendments  to  existing  standards  have  been  issued  by  the  IASB  or  IFRIC 

that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2010, or later periods.  Some updates that are not 

applicable or are not consequential to the Company may have been excluded from the list below.

IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements

IAS  1  prescribes  the  basis  for  presentation  of  general  purpose  fi nancial  statements  and  is  eff ective  for  annual  periods 

beginning  on  or  after  January  1,  2011  to  ensure  comparability  both  with  the  entity’s  fi nancial  statements  of  previous 

periods and with the fi nancial statements of other entities. It sets out overall requirements for the presentation of fi nancial 

statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their content.  There are no additional signifi cant 

impacts on the Company.

IAS 24 - Related Party Disclosures (Amendment)

The amended standard is eff ective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. It clarifi ed the defi nition 

of a related party to simplify the identifi cation of such relationships and to eliminate inconsistencies in its application. 

The  revised  standard  introduces  a  partial  exemption  of  disclosure  requirements  for  government-related  entities.  The 

Company does not expect any impact on its fi nancial position or performance. Early adoption is permitted for either the 

partial exemption for government-related entities or for the entire standard.  There are no additional signifi cant impacts 

on the Company.

Accounting standards effective January 1, 2012

Financial instruments disclosure

In October 2010, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7 – Financial Instruments: Disclosures that improve the disclosure 

requirements in relation to transferred fi nancial assets.  The amendments are eff ective for the annual periods beginning 

on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The Company does not anticipate the amendment to have a 

signifi cant impact on its consolidated fi nancial statements. 

 Income Taxes

In December 2010, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 12 – Income taxes that provide a practical solution to determining 

the  recovery  of  investment  properties  as  it  relates  to  the  accounting  for  deferred  income  taxes.    This  amendment  is 

eff ective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted.  The Company does not 

anticipate this amendment to have a signifi cant impact on its consolidated fi nancial statements.  

32

tsodilo resources limited

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

Accounting standards anticipated to be effective January 1, 2013

IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments Disclosure

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments was published and contained requirements for fi nancial assets updating IFRS 7. Requirements 

for fi nancial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010. Most of the requirements for fi nancial liabilities were carried 

forward unchanged from IAS 39. However, some changes were made to the fair value option for fi nancial liabilities to 

address the issue of own credit risk.  The Company does not anticipate this amendment to have a signifi cant impact on its 

consolidated fi nancial statements.

IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS 10 requires that a reporting entity should consolidate any investee that it controls. Control is the basis for consolidation 

for all types of investees. IFRS 10 also provides guidance on assessing control in circumstances where the assessment 

has proven to be diffi  cult. IFRS 10 provides more guidance about the factors to consider in such structures that involve 

potential  voting  rights,  agency  relationships,  relationships  with  structured  entities  and  control  without  a  majority  of 

voting  rights.   The  Company  consolidation  with  its  current  subsidiaries  and  related  consolidation  decisions  should  be 

unaff ected by the new consolidation model in IFRS 10.  

IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements

The IASB issued IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements on May 12, 2011.  IFRS 11 eliminates the Company’s choice to proportionately 

consolidate  jointly  controlled  entities  and  requires  such  entities  to  be  accounted  for  using  the  equity  methods  and 

proposes to establish a principles-based approach to the accounting for joint arrangements which focuses on the nature, 

extent and fi nancial eff ects of the activities that an entity caries out through joint arrangements and its contractual rights 

and obligations to assets and liabilities, respectively, of the joint arrangements.  The Company does not anticipate this 

amendment will have a signifi cant impact on its consolidated fi nancial statements.  

IFRS 12 – Disclosure of Interest in other entities

IFRS 12 sets out disclosure requirements for reporting entities that have an interest in a subsidiary, joint arrangement, 

associate or unconsolidated structured entity.  There  are no additional interest or disclosures required.  

Consolidation

On September 20, 2010 the IASB posted a staff  draft of a forthcoming IFRS on consolidation.  The staff  draft refl ects tentative 

decisions  made  to  date  by  the  IASB  with  respect  to  the  IASB’s  project  to  replace  current  standard  on  consolidations, 

IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and SIC-12, with a single standard on consolidation.  The IASB 

plans on publishing the fi nal standard on consolidation during the fi rst half of 2011, with an anticipated eff ective date of 

January 1, 2013.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact the fi nal standard’s expected to have on its condensed 

consolidated fi nancial statements.  

Fair Value Measurement 

IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement: eff ective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with early adoption 

permitted, sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value and new required disclosures about fair value 

measurements.  Management anticipates that this standard will be adopted in the Company’s fi nancial statements for the 

period beginning January 1, 2013, and has not yet considered the potential impact of the adoption of IFRS 13.  

33

tsodilo resources limited

3. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS 

Exploration and evaluation assets are summarized as follows:

Newdico 
Botswana
Precious 
Stones

Gcwihaba 
Botswana

Total

Precious 
Stones

Metals

Radio-Active
Materials

Subtotal

Balance at 
January 1, 2010

$ 4,259,345

$ 631,152

$ 28,596

$ -0-

$ 659,748

$ 4,919,093

Additions 

1,543,854

669,316

54,780

254,291 

49,390

3,167

--

--

724,096

2,267,950

52,557 

306,848 

Net Exchange 
Diff erences

Balance at 
December 31, 2010

    $6,057,490

$1,349,858

$86,543

$ -0-

$1,436,401 

$7,493,891

Additions 

1,461,647

456,415

668,300

334,763

1,459,478

2,921,125 

Net Exchange 
Diff erences

Balance at 
December 31, 2011

(1,227,579)

(129,086)

(189,014)

(94,680)

(412,780)

(1,640,359)

 $6,291,558

$1,677,187

$565,829

$240,083

$ 2,483,099

$ 8,774,657

The Company’s signifi cant exploration and evaluation assets are summarized as follows:

Newdico (Proprietary) Limited (“Newdico”) - Botswana

Newdico  holds  prospecting  licenses  in  the  Ngamiland  District  of  northwest  Botswana.  The  Company  acquired  the 

various licenses in 1999, 2001 and 2003.  In 2005, the Company was reissued its prospecting licenses for an initial term 

of  three  years  expiring  June  30,  2008,    renewable  for  2  additional  two  year  periods  upon  application  and  which  have 

a final expiry of June 2012.  In June of 2008, Newdico relinquished approximately 7,400 square kilometers of the then 

outstanding  16,800  square  kilometers  under  license.   The  licenses  relinquished  were  evaluated  and  determined  to  be 

non-prospective for an economic kimberlite discovery.  In June 2010, Newdico relinquished approximately 5,463 of the 

then outstanding 9,402 square kilometers under license.  The relinquishment of this portion of the overall licenses did 

not  cause  a  reduction  or  change  in  the  continuing  overall  exploration  program  nor  impact  the  chances  of  the  overall 

success of the program. The balance of the licenses totaling 3,949 square kilometers were renewed for a two-year period 

and  expire  in  June  2012.   The  terms  of  the  licenses  require  Newdico  to  spend  a  minimum  of  Botswana  Pula  3,639,490 

(US$ 477,676 as at December 31, 2011) inclusive of license fees, from the date of grant to and if held to their full-term.    

34

tsodilo resources limited

  
 
                
        
              
        
  
          
3. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued)

NEWDICO DIAMOND LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

PL 62/2005
PL 63/2005
PL 64 /2005
PL 65/2005
PL 66/2005
PL 67/2005
PL 68/2005
PL 69 /2005
PL 71/2005
TOTAL

797
718
851
194
621
229
220
181
138
3,949

7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10
7/01/10

7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12
7/01/12

2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal

Rental Fee 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

3,985
3,590
4,255
970
3,105
1.145
1,100
905
690
19,745

Work 
Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
1,800,000

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

407,970
407,180
408,510
401,940
406,210
402,290
402,200
401,810
401,380
3,639,490

53,545.20
53,441.60
53,616.10
52,753.80
53,314.30
52,799.80
52,787.90
52,736.80
52,680.30
477,676.00

Originally, as a result of an agreement completed on March 31, 2002, Newdico was owned 75% by Tsodilo and 25% by Trans Hex 

Group Limited (“THG”); with Tsodilo being the operator. Both Tsodilo and THG funded their initial investments in Newdico through 

a combination of an equity and debt interest. Based on the terms of the equity and debt interests, THG’s equity and debt interest in 

Newdico has been accounted for as a non-controlling interest. 

Starting in 2005, THG decided not to fund its proportionate share of expenditures on certain cash calls.  Accordingly, the Company’s 

interest in Newdico has increased from 75% to 97% at December 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 - 96%, and January 1, 2010 - 95%).  

Gcwihaba Resources (Proprietary) Ltd (“Gcwihaba”) – Botswana

Gcwihaba, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, holds prospecting licenses in the Ngamiland project area.

Diamond Exploration

Gcwihaba holds six (6) precious stone – diamond prospecting licenses in the Ngamiland District of north-west Botswana covering 

3,728 square kilometers as at December 31, 2010.   The Company acquired the various licenses in 2007, 2008 and 2009.  In April 2010, 

the Company relinquished PL 062/2007 in its entirety and PL’s 048 and 050/2008 were relinquished in their entirety in December 

2010.    PL’s  046,  047  and  049/2008  were  reduced  in  part  in  December  31,  2010.   The  licenses  relinquished  were  evaluated  and 

determined to be non-prospective for an economic kimberlite discovery. The relinquishment of this portion of the overall licenses 

did not cause a reduction or change in the continuing overall exploration program nor impact the chances of the overall success 

of the program. The terms of the licenses require Gcwihaba to spend a minimum of Botswana Pula 1,197,320 (US$ 157,146) as at 

December 31, 2011, inclusive of license fees from the date of grant to and if held to their full-term.

35

tsodilo resources limited

 
3.  EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued)

GCWIHABA DIAMOND LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current 
Stage

Expenditure

PL 46/2008
PL 47/2008
PL 49/2008
PL 641/2009

709
491
710
923

6/01/11
6/01/11
1/01/11
7/01/09

1/01/13
1/01/13
1/01/13
7/01/12

1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
Initial Grant

Rental 
Fee Per 
Annum 
(BWP)

3,545
2,455
3,550
4,615

PL 642/2009

839

7/01/09

7/01/12

Initial Grant

4,195

Pl 643/2009

786

7/01/09

7/01/12

Initial Grant

3,930

TOTAL

4,456

Metal Exploration

22,290

Work Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)

70,000
70,000
70,000
1) 70,000
2) 80,000
3) 90,000
1) 70,000
2) 80,000
3) 90,000
1) 70,000
2) 80,000
3) 90,000
930,000

Total Expenditure 
From Grant and if 
held to Full License 
Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

147,090
144,910
147,100

19,305.30
19,019.10
19,306.60

253,845

33,316.60

252,585

33,151.30

251,790

33,047.00

1,197,320

157,145.90

Gcwihaba  holds  eighteen  (18)  metal  (base,  precious,  platinum  group,  and  rare  earth)  prospecting  licenses  in  the 

Ngamiland District of northwest Botswana covering 12,118 square kilometers. The Company acquired the various licenses 

in 2005, 2008 and 2009.  In October 2010, PL’s 118 and 119/2005 were relinquished in part; and in December 2010, PL’s 

051 and 052/2008 were relinquished in part.  The relinquishment of this portion of the overall licenses did not cause a 

reduction or change in the continuing overall exploration program nor impact the chances of the overall success of the 

program. The terms of the licenses require Gcwihaba to spend a minimum of Botswana Pula 4,013,795 (US$ 526,881) as 

at December 31, 2011, inclusive of license fees from the date of grant to and if held to their full-term. 

36

tsodilo resources limited

3.  EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued)

GCWIHABA – METAL LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant 
Date

Renewal 
date

Current Stage

Expenditure

PL 118/2005
PL 119/2005
PL 051/2008
PL 052/2008
PL 386/2008
PL 387/2008
PL 388/2008
PL 389/2008
PL 390/2008
PL 391/2008
PL 392/2008
PL 393/2008
PL 394/2008
PL 395/2008
PL 595/2009
PL 596/2009
PL  5972009
PL 588/2009
TOTAL

367
827
487
382
570
965
318
979
808
455
829
938
650
972
320
925
514
796
12,102

10/01/10
10/01/10
07/01/11
07/01/11
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
01/01/12
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09

10/01/12
10/01/12
07/01/13
07/01/13
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
01/01/14
07/01/12
07/01/12
07/01/12
07/01/12

2nd Renewal
2nd Renewal
1st  Renewal
1st  Renewal
1st  Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
1st Renewal
Initial Grant
Initial Grant
Initial Grant
Initial Grant

Rental 
Fee Per 
Annum 
(BWP)

1,835
4,135
2,435
1,910
2,850
4,825
1,590
4,895
4,040
2,275
4,145
4,690
3,250
4,860
1,600
4,625
2,570
3,980
60,510

Work 
Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)
100,000
100,000
70,000
70,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,740,000

Total Expenditure From 
Grant and if held to Full 
License Term

BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

203,670
208,270
144,870
143,820
205,700
209,650
203,180
209,790
208,080
204,550
208,290
209,380
206,500
209,720
304,800
313,875
307,710
311,940
4,013,795

26,732
27,335
19,014
18,876
26,998
27,517
26,667
27,535
27,311
26,847
27,338
27,481
27,103
27,526
40,005
41,196
40,387
40,942
526,881

Radioactive Minerals 

As at December 31, 2011, Gcwihaba holds eight (8) radioactive mineral licenses in the Ngamiland District of northwest 

Botswana covering 6,925 square kilometers. The Company acquired two (2) of the licenses in July 2010 and a further six 

(6) in January 2011.  The terms of the licenses require Gcwihaba to spend a minimum of Botswana Pula 1,543,905 (US$ 

202,633) inclusive of license fees, from the date of initial grant to and if held to their full-term.  

37

tsodilo resources limited

3.  EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued)

GCWIHABA – RADIOACTIVE LICENSE AREAS AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011

PL numbers

Km²

Grant Date

Renewal 
date

Current Stage

Expenditure

Rental 
Fee Per 
Annum 
(BWP)

Pl 150/2010

719

07/01/10

07/01/13

Initial Grant

3,595

PL 151/2010

711

07/01/10

07/01/13

Initial Grant

3,555

PL 045/2011

1,000

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

5,000

PL 046/2011

847

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,235

PL 047/2011

907

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,535

PL 048/2011

769

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

3,845

PL 049/2011

974

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

4,870

PL 050/2011

1,000

01/01/11

01/01/14

Initial Grant

5,000

Work 
Program 
Per Annum 
(BWP)
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000
1) 50,000
2) 60,000
3) 70,000

Total Expenditure 
From Grant and if held 
to Full License Term
BWP

USD as at 
12.31.2011

190,785

25,040

190,665

25,024

195,000

25,593

192,705

25,292

193,605

25,410

191,535

25,139

194,610

25,542

195,000

25,593

TOTAL

6,925

34,635

1,543,905

202,633

General

Title to mineral properties involves certain inherent risks due to the difficulties of determining the validity of permits and 

the potential for problems arising from government conveyance accuracy, prior unregistered agreements or transfers, 

native land claims, confirmation of physical boundaries, and title may be affected by undetected defects. The Company 

does not carry title insurance. The Company has evaluated title to all of its mineral properties and believes, to the best of 

its knowledge, that evidence of title is adequate and acceptable given the current stage of exploration.

38

tsodilo resources limited

4. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT AND DEPOSITS ON EQUIPMENT

PropertyPlnt and Equipment

Cost

As at January 1, 2010

Additions

Net Exchange Difference

As at December 31, 2010

As at December 31, 2011

Additions

Net Exchange Difference

As at December31, 2011

Accumulated Depreciation

As at January 1, 2010

Depreciation

Net Exchange Difference

As at December 31, 2010

As at December 31, 2010

Depreciation

Net Exchange Difference

As at December 31, 2011

Net book value

As at January 1, 2010
As at December 31, 2010
As at December 31, 2011

Deposits on Equipment

As at January 1, 2010
Additions
Net exchange diff erence
As at December 31, 2010

-

Vehicles

Furniture and Equipment

$    747,792

114,871

76,033

$    938,696

$    85,555

100,546

44,574

$  230,675

Vehicles

Furniture and Equipment

$    938,696

1,097,607

(331,683)

$ 1,704,620

$  230,675

23,187

(33,491)

$ 220,371

Vehicles

Furniture and Equipment

$ 546,255

158,578

19,046

$ 723,879

$    64,409

29,291

28,376

$  122,076

Vehicles

Furniture and Equipment

$ 122,076

40,562

(14,802)

$ 147,836

$ 21,146
$ 108,599
$ 72,535

$723,879

178,573

(143,235)

$ 759,217

$ 201,097
$ 214,817
$ 945,403

$ 870,805
-
$ 870,805

Total

$     833,347

215,417

120,607

$ 1,169,371

Total

$ 1,169,371

1,120,794

(365,174)

$ 1,924,991

Total

$    610,664

187,869

47,422

$  845,955

Total

$  845,955

219,135

( 158,037)

$ 907,053

$ 222,683
$ 323,416
$ 1,017,938

For the year ended December 31, 2011, an amount of $219,135 (year ended December 31 2010: $187,869) of amortization has 
been capitalized under exploration properties.

The Company had purchased $870,805 of drilling equipment being custom designed during 2010.  The Company took 
possession of the equipment during the third quarter, 2011.

39

tsodilo resources limited

 5. SHARE CAPITAL 

(a) Common Shares

Authorized, Issued and outstanding   

The authorized capital stock of the Company comprises an unlimited number of common shares with no par value.

Issued  and  outstanding:  25,880,970  Common  Shares  as  at  December  31,  2011  (December  31,  2010  -  22,647,340 

Common Shares; January 1, 2010 - 18,787,457 Common Shares)

a)  During the year ended December 31, 2011:

(i) 

On  February  26,  2011,  728,061  warrants  were  exercised  at  a  price  of  C$0.70  for  proceeds  to  the 

Company of $516,713 (C$509,643).  The fair value of the warrant liability associated with the exercised 

warrants that was reclassified to share capital was $259,699.

(ii) 

On June 8, 2011, 210,894 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the Company 

of $150,889 (C$147,626).  The fair value of the warrant liability associated with the exercise warrants 

that was reclassified to share capital was $58,204.

(iii) 

On August 15, 2011, 201,519 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the Company 

of $148,728 (C$141,063).   The fair value of the warrant liability associated with the exercise warrants 

that was reclassified to share capital was $59,246. 

(iv) 

On December 22, 2011, 2,093,156 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.55 for proceeds to the 

Company  of  $1,110,217  (C$1,151,236).    The  fair  value  of  the  warrant  liability  associated  with  the 

exercised warrants that was reclassified to share capital was $714,899.

b)  During the year ended December 31, 2010:

(i) 

On January 22, 2010, the Company issued through a non-brokered private placement, 465,245 units 

of the Company at a price of $0.97 (C$1.00) per unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $451,944.  

Each  unit  consists  of  one  common  share  of  the  Company  and  one  warrant  of  the  Company.    Each 

warrant  entitles  the  holder  to  purchase  one  common  share  of  the  Company  at  a  price  of  C$1.00 

until January 22, 2012.  The amount of proceeds allocated to the common shares and warrants was 

$98,321 and $353,623, respectively.  Transaction costs of $3,156 were allocated to the shares.  

(ii) 

On March 1, 2010, 457,901 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the Company 

of  $304,896  (C$320,531).    The  fair  value  of  the  warrant  liability  associated  with  these  exercised 

warrants that was reclassified to share capital was $690,990.  

(iii) 

On June 29, 2010, the Company issued through a non-brokered private placement, 2,701,702 units of 

the Company at a price of $1.79 (C$1.85) per unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $4,832,360.  

Each  unit  consists  of  one  common  share  of  the  Company  and  one  warrant  of  the  Company.    Each 

warrant  entitles  the  holder  to  purchase  one  common  share  of  the  Company  at  a  price  of  C$2.17 

until January 22, 2015.  The amount of proceeds allocated to the common shares and warrants was 

$1,102,831  and  $3,729,729,  respectively.   Transaction  costs  of  $71,202  were  incurred  and  $18,398 

was allocated to the shares and $52,804 was allocated to the warrant.  Because the warrants are a 

FVTPL liability, the transaction costs allocated to the warrants were expensed.

(iv) 

On  November  19,  2010,  234,035  warrants  were  exercised  at  a  price  of  C$0.70  for  proceeds  to  the 

Company  of  $163,497  (C$114,448).    The  fair  value  of  the  warrant  liability  associated  with  these 

exercised warrants that was reclassified to share capital was $53,408. 

40

tsodilo resources limited

5.  SHARE CAPITAL (continued)

(b) Warrants

As at December 31, 2011, the following warrants were outstanding:

 Number of Warrants - Units

Exercise Price

December 31, 
2010

Issued

Exercised

Expired

December 
31, 2011

Expiry

February 26, 2011

June 7, 2011

August 4, 2011
December 22, 2011
January 20, 2012
June 29, 2015

C$0.70

C$0.70

C$0.70
C$0.55
C$1.00
C$2.17

728,061

331,386

201,519
2,102,758
465,245
2,702,702
  6,531,671

--

--

--
--
--
--
--

(728,061)

(210,894)

(201,519)
(2,093,156)
--
--
(3,233,630)

--

(120,492)
--
(9,602)
--
--
(130,094)

--

--

--
--
465,245
2,702,702
3,167,947

On February 26, 2011, 728,061 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the company of $516,713.  

On June 7 2011, 210,894 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the Company of $150,889.  Also 

120,492 warrants expired unexercised.

On August 15, 2011, 201,519 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.70 for proceeds to the Company of $148,728.

On December 22, 2011, 2,093,156 warrants were exercised at a price of C$0.55 for proceeds to the Company of $1,110,217   

Also 9,602 warrants expired unexercised.

Under IFRS, warrants having a strike price other that the functional currency of the issuer are a derivative liability and are 

marked to market as the end of each reporting period.  For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recorded 

a  mark  to  market  gain  of  $2,673,378  (December  31,  2010  -  $671,515)  on  the  revaluation  of  warrants.    As  at  December 

31, 2011, the outstanding warrants have a fair value of $1,500,766 (December 31, 2010 - $5,266,191; January 1, 2010 - $ 

2,598,156) which is determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with an expected volatility ranging from 

23.18% to 120.13%, expected life of 3.0 to 4.5 years at a risk free rate ranging from 0.95% to 1.06%.  

(c) Stock Option Plan

The  Company  has  a  stock  option  plan  providing  for  the  issuance  of  options  that  can  not  exceed  3,942,120  shares  of 

common stock.  The Company may grant options to directors, officers, employees, and contractors, and other personnel 

of the Company or its subsidiaries.  The exercise price of each option cannot be lower than the market price of the shares 

being the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange the day before the grant date.  

Options generally vest ratable over eighteen- month period, beginning with the date of issuance and every 6 months 

thereafter, and expire in five years from the date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors.

41

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
5.  SHARE CAPITAL (continued)

The following Table summarizes the Company’s stock option plan as at December 31, 2011:

Outstanding as at January 1, 2010
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired
Outstanding as at December 31, 2010
Granted
Expired
Cancelled
Outstanding as at December 31, 2011

Weighted average 

exercise price

Number of Shares
2,195,000
740,000
(210,000)
--
--
2,725,000
710,000
(215,000)
(420,000)
2,800,000

(C$)
C$0.80
C$1.91
C$1.39

C$1.06
C$1.15
C$0.83
C$0.98
C$1.11

On  January  3,  2011,  the  Company  issued  310,000  options  at  C$1.25  under  its  Stock  Option  Plan  to  persons  who  are 

officers and employees of the Company.  

On April 17, 2011, the Company issued 300,000 options at C$1.03 under its Stock Option Plan to persons who are officers 

and employees of the Company.  

On July 25, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 options at C$1.19 under its Stock Option Plan to persons who are officers 

and employees of the Company.

On January 3, 2011, 50,000 stock options at C$1.25 expired

On April 24, 2011, 100,000 stock options at C$0.70 expired.  

On August 15, 2011, 65,000 options at a price of C$0.70 expired.

420,000 options were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2011, as a result of employees’ and board member’s 

retirements from the Company 

Subsequent to December 31, 2011, (on January 2, 2012) 65,000 stock options at C$1.00 expired.  

Subsequent to December 31, 2011 (on January 3, 2012), the Company issued 235,000 options at C$0.90 under its Stock 

Option Plan to persons who are officers and employees of the Company.  

The  following  table  summarizes  the  stock  option  compensation  expense  and  capitalized  stock  compensation  for  the 

year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Stock-based compensation expense
Capitalized Stock-based compensation expense

2011
$ 427,864
399,033
$826,897

2010
$478,772
489,467
$968,239

The following assumptions were used in the Black Scholes option pricing model to fair value of the stock options granted 

during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Expected lives
Expected volatilities
Expected dividend yield
Risk free rates
Weighted average fair value of option

2011
3.0 to 4.5 years
158.4% - 176.0%
0%
0.68% - 1.90%
1.05

2010

5 years
118% - 126%
0%
2.42% - 2.6%
1.56

42

tsodilo resources limited

5.  SHARE CAPITAL (continued)

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding as at December 31, 2011:

Exercise 

Price 

(C$)

C$0.55
C$0.70
C$0.80
C$1.00
C$1.03
C$1.19
C$1.25
C$2.23

Number of 

Options Outstanding
Weighted 

Weighted 

Options Exercisable

Number of 

Weighted 

Weighted 

Outstanding 

Average 

Average 

Exercisable 

Options

Exercise 

Remaining 

Options

Price (C$)

Contractual 

C$0.55
C$0.70
C$0.80
C$1.00
C$1.03
C$1.19
C$1.25
C$2.23

Life (Years)
2.84
1.68
0.35
1.52
4.30
4.57
4.01
3.34

100,000
970,000
350,000
195,000
300,000
100,000
285,000
500,000
2,800,000

Average 

Exercise 

Average 

Remaining 

Price (C$)

Contractual 

Life (Years)

100,000
970,000
350,000
195,000
150,000
25,000
142,500
500,000
2,432,500

C$0.55
C$0.70
C$0.80
C$1.00
C$1.03
C$1.19
C$1.25
C$2.23

2.84
1.68
0.35
2.02
4.29
4.57
4.00
3.34

6. INCOME TAXES
The recovery of income taxes varies from the amounts that would be computed by applying the Canadian federal and 

provincial statutory rate of approximately 28.25% (2010: 31.00%) to net income (loss) before income taxes as follows:

Net Income (Loss) for the year

Income tax recovery at Canadian statutory
     Income tax rates
Eff ect of statutory tax rate change
Foreign operation taxed at lower rates
Permanent diff erences
Change in valuation allowances
Expiry of tax losses
Changes in estimate and foreign exchange
Other
Provision for (recovery of ) income taxes

December 31, 2011
$1,719,246

28.25%
485,687
(4,261)
4,545
(634,357)
(63,615)
163.847
49.040
(886)
$                --

December 31 2010

 $(223,146)

31.00%
(89,175)
(7,809)
7,143
(37,539)
(120,301)
135,256
105,905
(13,480)
$               --

The following summarizes the principal temporary diff erences and related future income tax eff ect:

Losses carried forward - Botswana 
Other
Exploration & Development - Botswana
Property, Plant and Equipment - Botswana

Net future income tax asset recorded

December 31, 2011
2,026,000
45,000
(2,026,000)
(45,000)

$               --

December 31 2010
1,798,000
45,000
(1,836,000)
(7,000)

$               --   

As at December 31, 2011, the Company has Canadian net operating losses carried forward that expire as follows:

Loss
275,000
335,000
235,000
213,000
136,000
307,000

Year of Expiry
2015
2016
2027
2028
2029
2030

43

tsodilo resources limited

 
6.  INCOME TAXES (continued)

456,000

2031

Total assessable losses relating to the activity in Botswana as at December 31, 2011 was $9,107,576 (2010: $8,317,342).  

7.  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Net earnings per share were calculated based on the following:

Year ended December31
Net income for the year
Effect of Dilutive Securities
     Stock options and warrants
Diluted net earnings for the year

2011
$  1,719,246

(7,937)
$  1,711,309

2010

$  (223,146)

--
$  (223,146)

Net earnings per share from continuing operations and net earnings per share for the year ended December 31 were calculated 

based on the following:

Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive securities:
      Stock Options
      Warrants
Diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding

2011
23,508,532

1,193,343
459,220
25,161,195

2010
21,004,082

--
--
21,004,082

The weighted average number of stock options and warrants outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2011 was 5,541,194 

of which 2,080,245 were dilutive and included in the above tables.  The eff ect of the remaining 3,460,949 million stock options was 

anti-dilutive because the underlying exercise prices exceeded the average market price of the underlying common shares of C$1.01.  

In addition, the loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the year period ended December 31, 2010 because the stock 

options and warrants were anti-dilutive.

8.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred leave benefits (2011: $23,412, 

2010: $33,293, 2009: $19,024, 2008: $19,024) payable to an officer and director of the Company amounting to $94,753.  

In June 2010: $59,451, April 2011: $19,612, December 2011: $15,690, the Company paid the officer and director of the 

Company  a  total  of  $94,753,  leaving  a  zero  balance  payable  as  at  December  31,  2011  to  an  officer  and  director  of  the 

Company.    

Remuneration of Key Management Personnel of the Company

Short term employee remuneration and benefits
Stock based compensation
Total compensation paid to key management personnel

2011
$   419,861
522,963
$   942,824

2010
$   348,427
559,963
$ 908,390

There are no other related party transactions. 

9.  SEGMENTED INFORMATION 

The  Company  is  operating  in  one  industry.    As  at  December  31,  2011  the  Company’s  long-term  assets  in  the  United 

States were $11,696 (December 31, 2010 - $7,909) and in Botswana of $1,006,242 (December 31, 2010 – $315,507).   No 

revenues or expenses were realized for Exploration and Evaluation Segments that are detailed in note 4 above.   

44

tsodilo resources limited

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The  Company’s  financial  instruments  include  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  accounts  receivable  and  accounts  payable 

and accrued liabilities.  The carrying value of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued 

liabilities  as  presented  in  the  financial  statements  are  reasonable  estimates  of  fair  values  due  to  the  relatively  short 

periods to maturity and the terms of these instruments.   

The Company’s financial instruments have been classified as follows: 

Financial Instrument 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Warrants 
See the Company’s statement of financial position for financial instrument balances. 

Classifi cation 
Held-for-trading 
Loans and receivables 
Other fi nancial liabilities 
Fair value through Profi t and Loss 

Fair Value Hierarchy 
Level 1  &  Level 2
n/a 
n/a 
Level 3

International Financial Reporting Standards 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy that 

reflects  the  significance  of  the  inputs  used  in  making  the  measurements.    The  fair  value  hierarchy  has  the  following 

levels:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – inputs other that quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly 

(i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices): and 

Level 3 – inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobserved inputs).

Risk Exposure and Management

The Company is exposed to various financial instrument risks and assesses the impact and likelihood of this exposure. 

These risks include liquidity risk, credit risk, and interest rate risk. Where material these risks are reviewed and monitored 

by the Board of Directors.

(a)  Capital Management 

The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern 

in order to pursue the development and exploration of its mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure 

which optimizes the costs of capital at an acceptable risk.

The  Company  depends  on  external  financing  to  fund  its  activities.  The  capital  structure  of  the  Company  currently 

consists of common shares, stock options and share purchase warrants. The Company manages the capital structure and 

makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. 

To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares, acquire or dispose of assets 

or adjust the amount of cash on hand.  In 2011 the Company raised the cash capital as shown in note 5(a) in the amount 

of  $1,926,547.    It  is  anticipated  that  the  Company  cash  balance  of  $1,505,965  will  be  substantial  enough  to  continue 

operations for the ensuing twelve months.   

In order to facilitate the management of its capital requirements, the Company prepares annual expenditure budgets, 

which are approved by the Board of Directors and updated as necessary depending on various factors, including capital 

deployment and general industry conditions.

The Company anticipates continuing to access equity markets to fund continued exploration of its mineral properties 

and the future growth of the business. 

45

tsodilo resources limited

10.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)

(b) Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company 

maintains  sufficient  cash  balances  to  meet  current  working  capital  requirements.  The  Company  is  considered  to  be 

in  the  exploration  stage.  Thus,  it  is  dependent  on  obtaining  regular  financings  in  order  to  continue  its  exploration 

programs. Despite previous success in acquiring these financings, there is no guarantee of obtaining future financings. 

The Company’s cash is invested in business accounts with quality financial institutions and which is available on demand 

for the Company’s programs, and is not invested in any asset backed commercial paper.

(c) Credit Risk

Credit  risk  is  the  risk  of  potential  loss  to  the  Company  if  the  counterparty  to  a  financial  instrument  fails  to  meet  it 

contractual  obligations. The  Company’s  credit  risk  is  primarily  attributable  to  its  liquid  financial  assets  including  cash 

and  equivalents  and  accounts  receivable,  there  are  no  amounts  at  risk. The  Company  limits  exposure  to  credit  risk  on 

liquid financial assets through maintaining its cash and equivalents with high-credit quality financial institutions.  There 

are no allowances for doubtful accounts required.  

The majority of the Company’s cash is held with a major Canadian based financial institution.

(d) Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk arises from the interest rate impact on its cash.  Because the cash is held on 

deposit at financial institutions and may be withdrawn at any time, the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is not 

significant.  

The Company is exposed to currency risks on its Canadian dollar denominated working capital balances due to changes 

in the USD/CAD exchange rate and the functional currency of the parent company.

The  Company  issues  equity  in  Canadian  dollars  but  the  majority  of  its  expenditures  is  in  U.S.  dollars.    The  Company 

purchases  U.S.  dollars  based  on  its  near  term  forecast  expenditures  and  does  not  hedge  its  exposure  to  currency 

fluctuations. 

Based  on  the  net  Pula  denominated  asset  and  liability  exposures  as  at  December  31,  2011,  a  10%  change  in  the  USD/

Pula exchange rate would not have a material impact the Company’s earnings.  The risk range from a 10% reduction in 

exchange rate is $16,701 to a 10% increase in exchange rate is $18,371.

11. COMMITMENTS 

All operating leases that are for a period of no longer than one year are prepaid.

The aggregate minimum lease payments exclusive of VAT are as follows:

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

$ 21,897

22,990

22,990

22,990

$ 90,867

The lease commitment is for storage space in Maun, Botswana at an annual rental of Pula 166,834 per year for 2012 and 

Pula 175,165 for years 2013 through 2015 plus taxes converted at an exchange rate as at December 31, 2011 to US dollars.

46

tsodilo resources limited

11.  COMMITMENTS (continued)

The  Company  holds  prospecting  licenses  which  require  the  Company  to  spend  a  specified  minimum  amount  on 

prospecting over the period of the terms as outlined in note 3.

12. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  

Net change in noncash working capital balances
Decrease / (Increase) in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
Increase / (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Total

December 31

December 31, 

2011

$(114,181)
6,657
($107,524)

2010

$2,469
$24,397
$26,866

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Warrants

On January 20, 2012, 465,245 warrants at a price of C$1.00 expired unexercised.   

Stock Option Plan

On  January  3,  2012,  the  Company  issued  235,000  options  at  C$0.90  under  its  Stock  Option  Plan  to  persons  who  are 

officers and employees of the Company.

On January 2, 2012, 65,000 stock options at C$1.00 expired.  

14. TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS

The Company has adopted IFRS with a transition date of January 1, 2010.  Under IFRS 1 ‘First Time Adoption of International 

Financial Reporting Standards,’ the IFRS are applied retrospectively at the transition date with all adjustments to assets 

and  liabilities  as  stated  under  Canadian  GAAP  taken  to  retained  earnings  unless  certain  exemptions  are  applied.   The 

guidance  for  first  time  adoption  of  IFRS  is  set  out  in  IFRS  1.    IFRS  1  provides  for  certain  mandatory  exceptions  and 

optional  exemptions  for  first  time  adopters  of  IFRS.   The  Company  is  applying  the  following  exemptions  on  first-time 

adoption of IFRS:







to not account for business combinations that occurred prior to January 1, 2010 using the principles of IFRS 

3 – Business Combinations and instead retain the accounting treatment applied under Canadian GAAP; 

to  charge  all  foreign  currency  translation  differences,  previously  recognized  as  a  separate  component 

of  equity  to  deficit  as  at  the  transition  date  including  those  foreign  currency  differences  which  arise  on 

adoption of IFRS; and 

to only apply IFRS 2 to the Sock Option Grants that were unvested as at the date of transition.

The IFRS 1 elections, identified, above, and the significant accounting policies, set out in note 2, have been applied in 

preparing  these  audited  consolidated  financial  statements  and  selected  audited  comparative  information  presented 

below.    The  following  tables  reconcile  the  Company’s  audited  consolidated  statements  of  financial  position  and 

statements  of  loss  and  comprehensive  income  (loss)  with  those  prepared  in  accordance  with  Canadian  GAAP  and  as 

previously reported to those prepared and reported in these audited consolidated financial statements in accordance 

with IFRS.  

47

tsodilo resources limited

14.  TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (continued)

Tsodilo Resources Limited

Reconciliation of equity as at January 1, 2010 
(in United States dollars)

Previous
Amounts per 
Canadian 
GAAP

$         108,341

67,640
175,981

$73,050 

73,050

210,814

28,696,445

8,221,288
1,131,904

ASSETS
Current
Cash 
Accounts receivable and 
prepaid expenses

Exploration Properties 
(note3)
Property, Plant and 
Equipment  (note 4)
Deposit on Equipment 
(note 4) 
 Total Assets

LIABILITIES
Current
Accounts payable and 
accrued liabilities 
Warrants (note 5b)
Total Liabilities

Minority Interest

SHAREHOLDERS’ 
EQUITY
Share Capital (note 5)
Stock Option Reserve 
(note 5c)
Warrants
Foreign Currency 
Reserve
Defi cit
Equity attributable to 
Owners of the Parent 
Non-controlling Interest 
(note 3)
Total Equity
 Total Liabilities & 
Equity

Adjustment
1

Adjustment 2 Adjustment

3

Adjustment
4

Total IFRS 
adjustments

IFRSs

IFRS 2
Stock-based 
Compensation

IAS 21
Foreign 
Exchange

IAS 32
Warrants 
in Non-
functional
Currency

IAS 21 
Reclass 
Non-
controlling 
Interest

5,361,645

$4,986

($447,538)

347,582

(124,899)

$5,885,208 

$4,986 

($572,437)

$ -- 

$ -- 

($567,451)

$5,317,757 

$             -0-

           $108,341

-0-
-0-

67,640
175,981

(442,552)

4,919,093 

(124,899)

222,683 

--

1

1

2,598,156
2,598,156

1
2,598,156
2,598,157

--

$73,051 
2,598,156 
2,671,207 

(210,814)

(210,814)

-0-

29,629

950,000

(1,335,000)
(1,131,904)

950,000

29,646,445

(1,305,371)
(1,131,904)

6,915,917
-0-

837,425
(2,539,185)

--
(34,150,053)

(837,425)
(31,610,868)

(24,643)

837,425
(1,409,863)

(1,081,252)

(23,427)

5,601,344

4,986

(572,438)

(2,598,156)

(23,427)

(3,189,035)

2,412,309

5,601,344

4,986

--
(572,438)

(2,598,156)

234,241
234,241
210,814 (2,954,794)

234,241
2,646,550

$  5,885,208

$ 4,986

($572,437)

$ --

$ --

($567,451)

$5,317,757

48

tsodilo resources limited

 
14.  TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (continued)

Tsodilo Resources Limited
Reconciliation of equity as at December 31, 2010 
(in United States dollars)

Previous
Amounts per 
Canadian 
GAAP

$      2,728,695

65,171
2,793,866

405,670

870,805
$11,590,721 

$95,455 

95,455

217,303

30,290,847

9,114,311
5,059,260

ASSETS
Current

Cash 
Accounts receivable 
and prepaid 
expenses

Exploration 
Properties (note 3)
Property, Plant and 
Equipment  (note 4)
Deposit on 
Equipment (note 4) 
Total Assets

LIABILITIES
Current
Accounts payable 
and accrued 
liabilities 
Warrants (note 5b)
Total Liabilities

Minority Interest

SHAREHOLDERS’ 
EQUITY
Share Capita
(note 5)
Stock Option 
Reserve (note 5c)
Warrants
Foreign Currency 
Reserve
Defi cit
Equity attributable 
to Owners of the 
Parent 
Non-controlling 
Interest (note 3)
Total Equity
Total Liabilities & 
Equity

Adjustment
1

Adjustment 
2

Adjustment
 3

Adjustment
4

Total IFRS 
adjustments

IFRSs

IFRS 2
Stock-based 
Compensation

IAS 21
Foreign 
Exchange

IAS 32
Warrants 
in Non-
functional
Currency

IAS 21 
Reclass 
Non-
controlling 
Interest

7,520,380

$ 133,144

($159,633)

(82,254)

$ 133,144

($241,887)

$ 0

$ 0

$ -0-

$      
2,728,695

-0-
-0-

65,171 
2,793,866 

(26,489)

7,493,891 

(82,254)

323,416 

0
($108,743)

870,805 
$11,481,978 

0

$ 1,993

1,993

(6,489)

$ 5,266,191
5,266,191

$           1,993
5,266,191
5,268,184

$       97,448 
5,266,191 
5,363,639

0

(210,814)

(217,303)

$0 

261,482

1,747,197

(1,491,587)
(5,059,260)

(837,425)
(32,349,030)

(128,338)

1,156,349
(1,409,863)

(462,541)

(23,427)

1,747,197

32,038,044 

(1,230,105)
(5,059,260)

7,884,206 
-0-

1,156,349
(2,024,169)

$318,924 
 (34,373,199)

11,277,963

133,144

(253,514)

(5,266,191)

(23,427)

(5,409,988)

5,867,975

11,277,963

133,144

16,123
(237,391)

(5,266,191)

234,241
210,814

250,364
(5,159,624)

250,364 
6,118,339 

$11,590,721

$ 133,144

($241,887)

$ 0

$ 0

 ($108,743)

$11,481,978 

49

tsodilo resources limited

14.  TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (continued)

Tsodilo Resources Limited
Reconciliation of Profi t and Loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 
(in United States dollars)

Previous
Amounts per 
Canadian 
GAAP

$79,692 

4,092
9,500
63,878

22,635

148,255
2,035

Adjustment
1

Adjustment 
2

Adjustment
3

Adjustment
4

Total IFRS 
adjustments

IFRSs

IFRS 2
Stock-based 
Compensation

IAS 21
Foreign 
Exchange

IAS 32
Warrants in 
Non-functional
Currency

IAS 21
Reclass
Non-controlling 
Interest

$ 0

$   79,692

0
0
0

0

0
0

$4,092 
$9,500 
$63,878 

$22,635 

148,255 
$2,035 

375,077

705,164

$ 103,695

103,695

--

--

--

103,695

$808,859 

103,695

$478,772 

--

--

(39,487)

6,489

(52,804)

671,515

(52,804)

($52,804)

671,515

$671,515 

0

0

($39,487)

$6,489 

(738,162)

(103,695)

--

618,711

--

515,016

($223,146)

--

335,047

335,047

$335,047 

Expenses

Corporate remuneration  
Corporate travel and 
subsistence 
Investor relations 
Legal and audit

Filings and regulatory fees

Offi  ce and administration
Amortization

Stock-based compensation
(note 5(d))

Total Expenses

Other Income

Warrant issue costs

Gain/(Loss) on warrants
Foreign exchange Gain/
(Loss)

Non-controlling interest

Net Income

Foreign exchange 
translation

Comprehensive Income

($738,162)

($103,695)

$ 335,047

$ 618,711

--

$ 850,063

$ 111,901 

Net Income attributable to 
owners of the parent
Net Income Attributable to 
Non-controlling Interest

Comprehensive income 
attributable to owners of 
the parent
Comprehensive Income 
Attributable to Non-
controlling Interest

($744,651)

($103,695)

$ 6,489

$ 618,711

$ 521,505

($223,146)

6,489
($738,162)

($103,695)

-6,489
$ --

$618,711

-6,489
$ 515,016

$ --

-- 
($223,146)

($744,651)

($103,695)

$ 325,413

$ 618,711

$ 840,429

$    95,778

6,489
($738,162

($103,695)

9,634
$ 355,047

$ 618,711

9,634
$ 850,063

$ --

16,123
$ 111,901

50

tsodilo resources limited

14.  TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (continued)

Tsodilo Resources Limited

Reconciliation of Statements of Cash Flows 

(in United States dollars)

Cash provided by (used in): 

Operating Activities

Net Income (Loss) for the period

Adjustments for non-cash items:

     Unrealized (gain) loss on warrants

     Amortization

     Other

     Stock-based compensation 

Year Ended December 31

2010

GAAP

Eff  ect of Transition 
to IFRS

2010

 IFRS

   $     (738,162)

$515,016

   $  (223,146)

--

2,035

6,489

375,077

(354,561)

(671,515)

(671,515)

--

(6,489)

103,695

(59,293)

2,035

--

478,772

(413,854)

Net change in non-cash working capital balances (note 11) 

24,874

(329,687)

1,992

26,866

(57,301)

(386,988)

Investing Activities

Additions to exploration properties

Additions to property, plant and equipment  

Deposit on Equipment

Financing Activities

Shares and warrants issued for cash, net of cost

Change in cash - For the period

Cash - beginning of period

Cash - end of period

(1,619,058)

(238,440)

(870,805)

(2,728,303)

5,678,344

5,678,344

2,620,354

108,341

$  2,728,695   

34,278

23,023

--

(1,584,780)

(215,417)

(870,805)

57,301

(2,671,002)

--

--

--

--

5,678,344

5,678,344

2,620,354

108,341

$ --

$2,728,695   

51

tsodilo resources limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.  TRANSITION AND FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS (continued)

NOTES TO RESTATEMENT OF EQUITY FROM PREVIOUS CANADIAN GAAP to IFRS

ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO RECONCILE EQUITY FROM CANADIAN GAAP TO IFRS

Adjustment 1 - IFRS 2 Stock Based Compensation Expenses

The Company issues share-based compensation in the form of stock options that vest evenly (semi-annually) over a two 

year period.  Under Canadian GAAP, the Company recognized the fair value of the compensation expenses, determined 

at the time of the grant, on a straight-line basis over the two year vesting period.  Under IFRS 2 Share Based Payments, 

the  fair  value  of  each  tranche  of  the  award  is  considered  to  be  a  separate  grant,  based  on  its  vesting  period.   The  fair 

value of each tranche is determined separately and recognized as compensation expense over the term of this respective 

vesting  period.    Accordingly,  compensation  expense  under  IFRS  was  recognized  at  more  accelerated  rates  than  under 

Canadian GAAP.   

The  Company  computed  all  non-vested  stock  options  at  January  1,  2010  on  a  graded  basis  separating  tranches  for 

amortization over respective vesting periods.  Stock option forfeitures were  also  estimated on   a historical basis.  The 

Black  Scholes  valuation  method  was  used  to  prepare  the  valuations,  calculations  and  details  for  disclosure  for  Stock 

Option expense and comparative stock option expense estimated for prior year comparisons.  As a result, Stock Option 

Reserves  were  increased  by  $29,629  as  at  January  1,  2010  and  $261,482  as  at  December  31,  2010.    Of  these  amounts, 

$4,986 and $133,144 were capitalized as salaries to exploration and evaluation cost as at January 1, 2010 and December 

31, 2010 respectively.     

Adjustment 2 – IAS 21 Foreign Exchange

The Company’s subsidiaries (Gcwihaba and Newdico) operate in a functional currency in Botswana Pula.  Under Canadian 

GAAP  the  subsidiaries  were  considered  integrated  operations  for  foreign  exchange  considerations  and  calculations.  

Under IFRS, since there is no integrated operation option and because of the difference in functional currency between 

these  subsidies  and  the  Company’s  U.S.  Dollars,  IFRS  provides  guidance  on  presenting  the  foreign  operations  in  the 

presentation currency.  Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and income and 

expenses are translated at the rates at which they have been incurred.  This differs from previous GAAP reporting which 

required non-monetary assets to be translated at the historical exchange rate in effect when the assets were acquired.  

For  December  31,  2009,  an  adjustment  of  ($124,899)  made  to  Plant,  Property  and  Equipment,  and  an  adjustment  of 

($447,538) was made to Exploration and evaluation cost.  For December 31, 2010, a cummulative adjustment of ($82,254) 

was made to Plant, Property and Equipment, ($159,633) was made to Exploration and Evaluation Cost, and $1,994 was 

made to Accounts Payable.  

Adjustment 3 – IAS 32 Warrants Denominated in Non-functional Currency

The  Warrants  issued  by  the  Company  provide  the  right  to  purchase  stock  in  Canadian  dollars.    Since  the  Company’s 

functional  currency  is  the  U.S.  dollar,  IFRS  requires  that  the  warrants  be  accounted  for  as  derivative  liabilities.        As  a 

result,  the  Company  has  reclassified  its  Warrants  from  Equity  to  liabilities  and  will  account  for  warrants  as  derivative 

liabilities with changes in fair value being recognized in profit or loss.     

At  inception  January  1,  2010  the  value  of  the  warrants  increased  by  $1,466,252  resulting  in  corresponding  charge  to 

deficit.  

Adjustment 4 – Non-Controlling Interest Reclassification into Equity

The Company reclassified its non-controlling interest at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 to equity. 

52

tsodilo resources limited

CORPORATE HEAD OFFICE 
TD Canada Trust Tower
161 Bay Street, Box 508 
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1 

Telephone: (416) 572-2033 
Facsimile: (416) 987-4369 

Website: www.TsodiloResources.com 
E-Mail: info@TsodiloResources.com 

AUDITORS 
Ernst & Young, LLP
Vancouver, Canada

LEGAL COUNSEL 
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP 
Toronto, Ontario 

REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT 
Computershare  Trust Company of Canada 
Toronto, Ontario 

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING 
TSX Venture Exchange 
Trading Symbol: TSD 

Corporate Information 

DIRECTORS 

James M. Bruchs, Chairman 
Washington, DC
Appointed as director in 2002 

Patrick C. McGinley 
Washington, D.C. 
Appointed as director in 2002 

Jonathan R. KeLafant
Arlington, Virginia
Appointed as director in 2007 

David J. Cushing
Chevy Chase, Maryland 
Appointed as director in 2008 

Michiel C. J. de Wit, Ph.D.
Irene, South Africa
Appointed as director in 2009

Murray Hitzman, Ph.D.
Golden Colorado
Appointed as director in 2011

OFFICERS 

James M. Bruchs, B.Sc., J.D. 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Appointed in 2002 

Michiel C. J. de Wit, Ph.D.
Irene, South Africa
President and Chief Operating Officer
Appointed in 20109

Gary A. Bojes, CPA, Ph.D.
Chief Financial Officer 
Appointed in 2007

Gail McGinley 
Corporate Secretary
Appointed in 2005

53

tsodilo resources limited